United States
               Environmental Protection
               Agency
                Motor Vehicle Emission Lab
                2565 Plymouth Rd.
                Ann Arbor, Michigan 48105
EPA 460/3-80-007
November 1979
c/EPA
               Air
Durability Demonstration of Systems
for Control of Sulfuric Acid

-------
                         EPA 460/3-80-007
Durability Demonstration
  of Systems for Control
       of Sulf uric Acid
                  By

              Melvin N. Ingalls

          Southwest Research Institute
             6220 Culebra Road
           San Antonio, Texas 78284

            Contract No. 68-03-2481

        EPA Project Officer: Robert I. Bruetsch
               Prepared for:
      ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
         Office of Air, Noise and Radiation
      Office of Mobile Source Air Pollution Control
        Emission Control Technology Division
       Characterization and Applications Branch

           Ann Arbor, Michigan 48105
              November, 1979

-------
This report  is  issued  by the Environmental  Protection Agency to disseminate
technical data of interest to a limited number of readers. Copies are available free of
charge to Federal employees, current  contractors and  grantees, and nonprofit
organization - in limited  quantities  - from  the  Library,  motor Vehicle Emission
Laboratory, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48105, or, for a fee,  from  the National Technical
Information Service, 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield, Virginia 22161.
This report was furnished to the Environmental  Protection Agency by Southwest
Research Institute, 6220 Culebra Road, San Antonio, Texas 78284, in fulfillment of
Contract No.  68-03-2481. The contents of this  report are reproduced  herein  as
received from Souihwest Research Institute. The opinions, findings, and conclusions
expressed are those of the author and not necessarily those of the Environmental
Protection Agency. Mention of company or product names is not to be considered as
an endorsement by the Environmental Protection Agency.
                       Publication No. EPA-460/3-80-007

-------
                                  ABSTRACT
     The work described in this report involved the development testing,
optimization, and durability testing of emission control systems capable
of meeting the 1981 gaseous emission standards while maintaining low
sulfate emissions.  Four emission control systems were investigated:
(1) oxidation catalyst with air modulation system, (2) high temperature
exhaust system,  (3) threeway catalyst with feedback carburetor, and
(4) three way plus oxidation catalyst with air modulation system and
feedback fuel injection.

     In Phase I of the project, the air modulation system and the threeway
catalyst system were selected for optimization and durability testing.  In
addition to the usual gaseous emissions, nonmethane hydrocarbons, total
cyanide and ammonia were measured on both systems.  The oxidation system
was operated on a test car for 24100 km (15,000 miles) and the threeway
catalyst system for 32200 km (20,000 miles), with emission tests every
8050 km (5,000 miles).  The durability distance accumulation was halted
on both cars because gaseous emission levels exceeded the 1981 standards.

     In Phase II of the project, a threeway plus oxidation catalyst system
was developed, optimized and tested for durability for 64,400 km (40,000
miles) .  During the durability testing, emissions tests were performed
every 8050 km (5000 miles).
                                    111

-------
                                  FOREWORD
     This project was conducted for the U.S.  Environmental  Protection Agency
by the Department of Emissions Research for Southwest Research Institute.
The project was begun in November 1976, and the laboratory  work was completed
in September 1979.  The project was conducted under EPA contract No.  68-03-2481
and was identified within Southwest Research Institute as Project 11-4746.

     During the course of the project,  several of the personnel in the Emis-
sion Control Technology Division, Office of Mobile Source Pollution Control,
Environmental Protection Agency, Ann Arbor, Michigan, served as EPA Project
Officer.  These persons were:  Randall  H. Field, John J.  McFadden, Kenneth
Partymiller, Andrew W. Kaupert and Robert I.  Bruetsch.  Karl J. Springer,
Director, Department of Emissions Research at Southwest Research Institute,
served as Project Manager.  The project was under the supervision of Melvin
N. Ingalls, Senior Research Engineer,as Project Leader.  Although a number
of Department of Emissions Research personnel were involved in the project,
key personnel included C. E. Grinstead, senior technician and C. D. Suhler,
lead technician, who were responsible for installation and  maintenance of
the mechanical systems; N. C. Reeh, senior technician, who  fabricated much
of the necessary systems hardware; and  J. T.  Jack,  Jr.,  senior technician,
and D. A. Travers, technician, who were responsible for the emissions testing.

     Project Review meetings involving  EPA and SwRI personnel, either at
SwRI or the EPA facility in Ann Arbor,  Michigan, were held  on November 23,
1976, December 10, 1976, August 23, 1977 and June 7, 1978.   In addition,
frequent telephone conversations between the Project Leader at SwRI and
the EPA Project Officer insured a proper understanding by both SwRI and EPA
of the project aims, problems and accomplishments.
                                     IV

-------
                             TABLE OF CONTENTS

                                                                    Page
ABSTRACT

FOREWORD                                                              iv

LIST OF FIGURES                                                      vii

LIST OF TABLES                                                        ix

SUMMARY                                                               xi

I.        INTRODUCTION                                                 1

II.       TEST EQUIPMENT AND PROCEDURES                                3

          A.   General Emission Test Procedures                        3
          B.   Collection and Analysis of Unregulated Emissions        3
          C.   Durability Test Procedures                              8
          D.   Fuels                                                   8

III.      PHASE I - INITIAL EVALUATION, OPTIMIZATION AND
          DURABILITY TESTING LOW SULFATE SYSTEMS                      11

III-l.    EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM AND VEHICLE SELECTION               12

          A.   1975 Chevrolet Nova                                    13
          B.   1977 Plymouth Fury                                     13

III-2.    EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT AND EVALUATION          20

          A.   Air Modulation System Development                      20
          B.   High Temperature Exhaust System Development            32
          C.   Emission Control System Rating                         40

III-3.    AIR MODULATION SYSTEM-OPTIMIZATION AND DURABILITY
          TESTING                                                     43

          A.   Air Modulation System Optimization                     43
          B.   Air Modulation System Durability Testing               46

III-4.    THREEWAY CATALYST SYSTEM-OPTIMIZATION AND DURABILITY
          TESTING                                                     55

          A.   Threeway Catalyst System Optimization                  55
          B.   Threeway Catalyst System Durability Testing            59

IV.       PHASE II - OPTIMIZATION AND DURABILITY TESTING OF
          THREEWAY PLUS OXIDATION CATALYST SYSTEM                     69

-------
                        TABLE OF CONTENTS  (Confd)
IV-1.      TEST VEHICLE,  EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM AND TEST PLAN

          A.    Vehicle Selection and Description
          B.    Emission Control System
          C.    Test Organization for Phase II

IV-2.      OPTIMIZATION TESTING                                        85

          A.    Tests in Stock Configuration                           87
          B.    Tests with Maximum Air                                 87
          C.    Tests with Exhaust Manifold Air Injection              92
          D.    Tests to Optimize the Air Modulation System            93

IV-3.      DURABILITY TESTING OF 1978 VOLVO                            99

          A.    Distance Accumulation Chronology                       99
          B.    Fuel and Oil Consumption                              102
          C.    Emission Test Results                                 102

V.        CONCLUSIONS                                                111

          A.    Ability to Produce Low Sulfate Emissions              111
          B.    Durability                                            111
          C.    General                                               112

REFERENCES                                                           113

APPENDICES

          A.    Worksheets for Sulfate Control System Evaluation
          B.    Computer Printouts for Air Modulation System Development
               Tests on a 1976 Chevrolet Impala
          C.    Computer Printouts for High Temperature Exhaust System
               Development Tests on a 1975 Chevrolet Nova
          D.    Computer Printouts for Air Modulation System Optimization
               and Durability Tests on the 1975 Chevrolet Nova
          E.    Computer Printouts for Threeway Catalyst System Optimization
               and Durability Tests on the 1977 Plymouth Fury
          F.    Computer Printouts for Air Modulation System Optimization
               for Durability Tests on a 1978 Volvo
                                      VI

-------
                              LIST OF FIGURES

Figure                                                              Page

  1       Emissions Collection and Analysis Equipment                  4

  2       Speed vs. Time Traces of FTP, HFET and CFDS Driving
          Cycles                                                       5

  3       Schematic of Sulfate Sample Collection System                7

  4       SwRI Durability Driving Course                               9

  5       Holley feedback carburetor engine system                    17

  6       Feedback carburetor cross-section                           19

  7       Air Modulation Valve                                        22

  8       Air Modulation Valve Calibration                            23

  9       Manifold Vacuum as a Function of Engine Speed During
          FTP Test on 1976 Impala                                     27

 10       Cross Section of Centrifugal Clutch                         30

 11       Modulated Air Injection System                              31

 12       Air Gap Insulated Exhaust Manifolds                         34

 13       Conversion of Fuel Sulfur to H2SC>4 for Baseline and High
          Temperature Tests on 1975 Nova                              39

 14       Distance Accumulation Record of 1975 Chevrolet Nova         49

 15       Emissions as a Function of Distance Accumulated for a
          1975 Nova with Air Modulation                               51

 16       Fuel Consumption and Sulfates as a Function of Distance
          for a 1975 Nova with Air Modulation System                  52

 17       Distance Accumulation Record of 1977 Plymouth Fury          61

 18       Emissions as a Function of Distance Accumulated for a
          1977 Fury with 3-way Catalyst and Feedback Carburetor       65

 19       Fuel Consumption and Sulfates as a Function of Distance
          for a 1977 Fury with Feedback Carburetor                    66

                                    vii

-------
                          LIST OF FIGURES (Cont'd)

Figure                                                              Page

 20       1978 Volvo 244 Test Car                                     72

 21       Lambda-Sond System                                          74

 22       Fuel Injection System                                       75

 23       Air Pump Exhaust Manifold Injection                         76

 24       Aspirated Exhaust Manifold Injection                        76

 25       Air Injection System                                        77

 26       Redesigned Centrifugal Clutch                               79

 27       Redesigned Air Modulation Valve                             80

 28       SwRI Cold Start Circuit for Volvo with Lambda-Sond          81

 29       ECU Input Voltage from SwRI Circuit During Cold Start       82

 30       Cold Start Circuitry for Modified Volvo Lambda-Sond
          System                                                      83

 31       Air Modulation Valve Air Flow Calibration on 1978 Volvo     95

 32       Distance Accumulation Record of 1978 Volvo 244DL           100

 33       HC and CO Emissions from a 1978 Volvo with Lambda-Sond
          plus Oxidation Catalyst and Modair as a Function of
          Distance                                                   105

 34       NOX and Sulfate Emissions from a 1978 Volvo with Lambda-
          Sond plus Oxidation Catalyst and Modair as a Function of
          Distance                                                   106

 35       FTP Gaseous Emissions as a Function of Distance Driven
          for Two Emission Control Systems on a 1978 Volvo           109

 36       CFDS Sulfate Emissions as a Function of Distance Driven for
          Two Emission Control Systems on 1978 Volvo                 110
                                   Vlll

-------
                              LIST OF TABLES

Table                                                               Page

  1       Fuel Analysis                                               10

  2       Description of Test Cars                                    14

  3       Component Changes to 1975 Nova                              15

  4       Air Modulation System Development Test Sequence             24

  5       Results of Air Modulation System Development Tests          25

  6       Results from Insulated Manifold Tests with Pelleted
          Catalyst                                                    35

  7       Results from Baseline and Tests with Port Liners and
          Monolith Catalysts                                          37

  8       Exhaust Temperature with and without Insulated Manifolds    38

  9       Evaluation Scoring Criteria                                 41

 10       Emission Control System Evaluation Ratings                  42

 11       FTP Test Results for Air Modulation System Installed on
          1975 Nova                                                   44

 12       Maintenance Schedule for 1975 Nova                          48

 13       Fuel and Oil Consumption During Durability Testing
          for 1975 Nova                                               47

 14       Durability Test Results from 1975 Nova with Air
          Modulation System                                           50

 15       Unregulated Emissions from 1975 Nova with Air Modulation
          System - 16100 km Test                                      54

 16       Unregulated Emissions from 1975 Nova with Air Modulation
          System - 24100 km Test                                      54

 17       Results of Optimization Tests of Threeway Catalyst
          System on a 1977 Fury                                       56

 18       Maintenance Schedule for 1977 Fury                          62
                                     IX

-------
                          LIST OF TABLES (Cont'd)

Table                                                               Page

 19       Fuel and Oil Consumption During Durability Testing
          for 1977 Fury
                                                                      60
 20       Durability Test Results from 1977 Plymouth Fury with
          Feedback Carburetor and Threeway Catalyst                   64

 21       Unregulated Emissions from 1977 Plymouth Fury with
          Feedback Carburetor and Threeway Catalyst - 24100 km        68

 22       Unregulated Emissions from 1977 Plymouth Fury with
          Feedback Carburetor and Threeway Catalyst - 32200 km        68

 23       Description of Phase II Test Car                            71

 24       Phase II Test Sequence                                      86

 25       Test Results from 1978 "California" Volvo in Stock
          Configuration                                               88

 26       Test Results From 1978 "California" Volvo with Threeway
          Catalyst plus Air Modulation Oxidation Catalyst             90

 27       Mass Emissions from Cold Start Transient Phase of FTP
          for Selected Tests on 1978 Volvo                            91

 28       FTP Test Results from 1978 "California" Volvo               94

 29       Comparison of Emission on 1978 Volvo with Three Emission
          Control System Configurations                               98

 30       Volvo Maintenance Schedule                                 101

 31       Fuel and Oil Consumption During Durability Testing of
          1978 Volvo                                                 103

 32       FTP Emissions for 1978 Volvo 244 with Air Modulation
          During 64,400 Kilometer Durability Testing                 104

 33       CFDS Sulfate Emissions for 1978 Volvo 244 with Air
          Modulation During 64,400 Kilometer Durability Testing      107

-------
                                   SUMMARY
     The objective of this project was to demonstrate the durability of two
low sulfate emission control systems capable of meeting the 1981 gaseous
emission standards.  In numerical terms, the Project emission goals were
as shown below.

          Test Cycle      Emission Type     	Goal	

             FTP               HC           0.25 g/km  (0.41 g/mi.)
             FTP               CO           2.11 g/km  (3.4  g/mi.)
             FTP               NOX          0.62 g/km  (1.0  g/mi.)
             CFDS              804=         3.11 mg/km (5.0 mg/mi.)

     Initially, the project emphasis was to be on the durability testing
of developed advanced systems.  However, most of the advanced systems
existed only in concept or tailored to a single engine model only.  There-
fore, hardware development necessarily became a large part of the project.

Phase I
     At the outset of the project it was decided that a threeway catalyst
with feedback fuel control system would be one of the systems tested for
durability.  The other system would be either an oxidation catalyst with
modulated air injection and EGR, or a high temperature exhaust system
with standard air injected oxidation catalyst and EGR.  Which of these
two systems would be tested for durability would depend of the results of
the evaluation testing.

     The oxidation catalyst, modulated air injection system was evaluated
on a 1976 Chevrolet Impala with a 5.7 litre (350 CID) engine.  The high
temperature exhaust system was evaluated on a 1975 Chevrolet Nova with
a 5.7 litre (350 CID) engine.  While neither system met the project goals
during the evaluation, the modulated air injection was selected as having
the best chance of meeting the goals with further optimizaiton.

     The 1975 Chevrolet Nova was to be used as the durability test vehicle.
Therefore, the air modulation system was installed on the Nova and a series
of tests run,  modifying the system as necessary during the testing to
produce a system capable of meeting the project goals.  The final emission
control system consisted of the following elements and changes from stock
condition:
                                    XI

-------
     •  Two monolith oxidation catalysts,  one  in the exhaust pipe of each
       cylinder bank

     •  Modulated air injection to  catalyst

     •  2.56 rear axle ratio replacing standard 3.08 ratio rear axle

     "  Ignition timing advanced from 6°  to 9° ETC

       Increased EGR

       Single plane aluminum intake manifold

The emission levels for the optimized system are listed below:

          Test Cycle      Emission Type     	Value	

            FTP                HC           0.18 g/km  (0.29  g/mi.)
            FTP                CO           1.03 g/km  (1.65  g/mi.)
            FTP                NOX         0.48 g/km  (0.77  g/mi.)
            CFDS               804=        3.85 mg/km (6.19 mg/mi.)

     A 1977 Plymouth Fury was used as the test car for the threeway
catalyst system. A series of optimization tests were run during which
system hardware and settings were  changed to  produce a system that would
meet the project goals.  The final emission control system consisted of
the following elements:

       Two threeway catalysts with 5 to  1 Pt/Rd ratio.  One catalyst
       on the exhaust of each cylinder bank.

       Experimental Holley feedback carburetor

       An SwRI built open loop fuel control circuit, independent of the
       fuel system main electronic control unit, for use during cold
       starts

       An EGR system

       Shortened cold start operation of the  choke, inlet air heater and
       manifold heat

       Orifice spark advance control (OSAC) ststem

     The emission levels for the optimization system are listed below:

          Test Cycle      Emission Type     	Value	

             FTP              HC            0.09 g/km  (0.14  g/mi.)
             FTP              CO            1.98 gAm  (3.19  g/mi.)
             FTP              NOX            0.43 gAm  (0.69  g/mi.)
             CFDS             SO4            0.57 mg/km (0.92 mg/mi.)
                                    XI1

-------
     Following optimization, both systems were tested for durability
using the Durability Driving Schedule.  Emission tests were performed
every 8050 km  (5,000 miles).  Durability testing was halted at 24100 km
(15,000) on the 1975 Nova with the air modulation system and at 32200 km
(20,000 miles) on the 1977 Fury because some of the gaseous emissions on
both systems were above the 1981 standards.

Phase II

     In a continuation of the effort to meet the project goals, an air
injected oxidation catalyst was added to a stock Volvo threeway catalyst
system on a 1978 California Volvo sedan with a four cylinder engine.
Since threeway plus oxidation catalyst systems can produce large amounts
of sulfates, an air modulation scheme was included as part of the air
injection system.  Considerable optimization testing was required before
the system met the project goals.  The final emission control system
consisted of the following additions and changes to the stock California
Volvo threeway catalyst system.

       Oxidation catalyst

       Modulated air injection system

       Open loop cold start fuel control circuit

       A/F ratio leaner than stock setting

     The emission levels for the optimized system are listed below:

          Test Cycle      Emission Type     	Value	

             FTP              HC            0.14 g/km  (0.23  g/mi.)
             FTP              CO            1.31 g/km  (2.10  g/mi.)
             FTP              NOX           0.13 gAm  (0.23  g/mi.)
             CFDS             S04=          0.04 mg/km (0.06 mg/mi.)

     Following optimization, the system was tested for durability for
64,400 km (40,000 miles) using the Durability Driving Schedule.  Emission
tests were performed every 8050 km (5,000 miles).  At the end of the
durability testing, the HC, NOX and sulfate emissions were still within
the project goals.  The CO emissions were greater than the 1981 standards
by approximately seven percent.

     Emission tests with the car in stock condition at the end of the
durability testing indicated that most of the emission increases were
caused by deterioration of the air modulation system hardware.  Therefore
for a system such as tested in this project to pass an 80500 km (50,000
mile)  certification test, requires only more durable air modulation hardware,
Thus the project demonstrated that it is possible to meet the 1981 gaseous
emission standards while maintaining low sulfate emissions.
                                   Xlll

-------
                                 I.  INTRODUCTION
     Sulfuric acid  (sulfate) emissions from catalyst equipped cars have been
extensively studied by EPA for the past several years.(1-5)*  At present, it
appears that automotive sulfate emissions standards are not necessary.  How-
ever, with the expected extensive use of threeway plus oxidation catalyst
emission control system in 1981, there is a possibility of greatly increased
sulfate emissions due to the tendency of this system to produce larger amounts
of sulfates than current control systems.(5-7)  In addition, the 1977 Amend-
ments to the Clean Air Act, as interpreted by EPA in OMSAPC Advisory Circular
76, places the burden on the  manufacturers to establish that their emission
control systems, or vehicle and engine design elements, do not cause an un-
reasonable risk to public health, welfare or safety.(6)  The Advisory Circular
specifically names sulfates as one of the unregulated emissions to be considered.

     This study was undertaken to evaluate the low sulfate potential of several
emission control systems proposed for meeting the 1981 gaseous emissions stan-
dards and to demonstrate the durability of two of these systems.  It builds
upon research in mobile source sulfate emissions conducted at Southwest Research
Institute for EPA and others since 1975.(7-11)

     Initially, the project emphasis was to be on the durability testing of
developed advanced systems.  However, most of the advanced systems existed only
in concept or tailored to a single engine model.  Therefore, hardware develop-
ment necessarily became a large part of the project.

Objective

     The objective of this project was to evaluate a variety of emission control
systems which would produce low sulfate emissions and meet the 1981 gaseous
emission standards of 0.26 g/km (0.41 g/mile)  HC, 2.11 g/km (3.4 g/mile) CO, and
0.62 g/km (1.0 g/mile) NOX after 80500 km (50,000 miles).  Low sulfate emissions
were defined to be below 3.1 rag/km (5 mg/mile).  Following the evaluation, two
of the most promising systems were to be optimized and tested for durability.

Approach

     To meet the objectives of the project, three emission control systems were
chosen from the approximately six systems proposed.  These three systems were
fabricated and installed on test vehicles or,  in one case, obtained already
installed from the car manufacturer.   Chassis dynamometer tests over the light-
duty  Federal Test Procedure (FTP) and the Congested Freeway Driving Schedule
*Superscript numbers in parentheses refer to references at the end of this report.

-------
(CFDS) were performed to evaluate the ability of the system to produce low
sulfate emissions, while meeting the 1981 gaseous emission standards.  The
two most promising systems, the modulated air injection system and the three-
way catalyst system, were optimized and durability tested for approximately
32,000 km (20,000 miles).  Durability distance accumulation was halted on
both cars because some FTP gaseous emissions rates were above the 1981 limits.

     In Phase II of the project, a threeway plus oxidation catalyst system
with modulated air injection was chosen for use in a continued effort to meet
the project emission objectives.  This system was used on a five passenger
Volvo sedan with a four-cylinder, fuel injected engine.  The air modulation
system was optimized and the car driven for 64,400 km  (40,000 miles)  of
durability distance accumulation.  The durability testing was halted at this
point because of funding limitations.

-------
                      II.   TEST  EQUIPMENT AND  PROCEDURES


     This  section  covers  the  equipment  and procedures  used  to  obtain  and
analyze the  gaseous  exhaust emissions,  exhaust  sulfates,  and other  unregu-
lated emissions  measured  during both  Phase I  and  Phase II of this project.
Also covered are the procedures for durability  distance accumulation  and
analysis of  the  fuels used during  the project.

A.   General Emission Test Procedures

     The 1978 light-duty  Federal Test Procedure (FTP)  without  evaporative
emissions, was followed in terms of procedure and equipment as much as
possible for all tests.   It is  assumed  that the reader is familiar  with this
test procedure.  If  not,  it can be found in 40  CFR Part 86.  The latest re-
codification was published in the  Federal Register, Volume  42, Number 124,
dated June 28, 1977.

     The gaseous emissions of hydrocarbons  (HC),  carbon monoxide  (CO), and
oxides of  nitrogen (NOX)  were collected and analyzed using  the procedures
of  the light-duty  FTP.  The tests  were  performed  on a  Clayton  chassis dyna-
mometer, model EC-50, with the  vehicles manually  driven.  A Positive  Dis-
placement  Pump Constant Volume  Sampler  (PDP-CVS),  with a  nominal capacity
of  350 CFM was used.  To  collect the  sulfate  sample, the  usualy CVS system
was modified by inserting a three  meter long  tunnel, approximately  21 cm
in  diameter,  between the  CVS  room  air filter  box  and the  entrance to  the CVS
heat exchanger.  Figure 1 shows various views of  the test area, CVS system
and the analysis instruments  for the  bagged gaseous emissions.

     There were  three main driving cycles used  during  this  project.   The
first was  the driving cycle used in the light-duty FTP, known  as the  LA-4
cycle or the Urban Dynamometer  Driving  Schedule (UDDS).   The second was
the Highway  Fuel Economy  Test (HFET)  cycle.   The  third cycle,  developed
specifically as  a  sulfate test  cycle, is called the Congested  Freeway
Driving Schedule (CFDS).   The speed versus time traces of these three cycles
are shown  in Figure  2.

B.   Collection  and  Analysis  of Unregulated Emissions

     This  section  discusses the collection and  analysis of  exhaust  sulfate,
nonmethane hydrocarbons,  hydrogen  cyanide and ammonia;  the unregulated
emissions  measured as part of this project.

     Sulfate

     The exhaust sulfates were  collected as sulfuric acid on 47 mm  Fluoropore*

*Fluoropore is a registered trademark of the Millipore Corporation.
 Fluoropore filters are made of PTFE  (Polytetroflucrethylene)  bonded
 to polyethylene net.
                                      3

-------
                    General View of Test Area
Dilution Air Filter Box
   and Sulfate Tunnel
Emission Analyzers for Bagged
     Gaseous Emissions
     Figure 1.   Emissions collection and analysis  equipment

-------
100


 80


 60

 40

 20

  0
   L  e
                  .TRANSIENT
                     PHASE
                       STABILIZED
                         PHASE
100

 80


 60

 40


 20

  0
                                                                                              1398
100

 80

 60

 40

 20

  0
                                                          765
                           Avg.  Speed
                            kph  (mph)
                    Cycle

                    HFET    77.55(48.20)

                    UDDS    31.70(19.70)

                    CFDS    55.96(34.78)
  Distance
  km(mlles)

16.48(10.24)

12.07(7.50)

21.74(13.51)
                                                        Time
                                                       Seconds

                                                          765

                                                         1372

                                                         1398
 Figure  2.    Speed vs.  time traces of FTP,  HFET and CFDS  driving cycles

-------
filters with 0.5 \m pore size.   The samples were obtained isokinetically
using a probe centered in the 21 cm diameter tube.  Figure 3 is a schematic
of the collection system.

     The amount of sulfate deposited on the filter is determined by the barium
chloranilate analysis (BCA) procedure developed by EPA.d2)   A complete des-
cription of this procedure as used at SwRI, can be found in Reference 8.
Briefly, it involves placing the filter in a 60/40 mixture of isopropanol
and water to place the sulfates in solution.  Part of the solution is fed
through a column containing barium chloranilate, which reacts with the sulfates
forming barium sulfate and releasing chloranilic acid.  The amount of chlor-
anilic acid released is measured using a UV Spectrophotometer.

     Non-Methane Hydrocarbons

     Over the years, there has been much discussion concerning whether or not
methane should be included in the HC emission standards since it does not
enter in the classical smog reaction.  On some tests during this project, the
amount of methane in the bag samples was determined using a method developed
by EPA.(13-15)  The methane is then subtracted from the total FID HC to give
the total nonmethane hydrocarbons.  This procedure uses a single gas chroma-
tograph with a multiple column arrangement and dual gas sampling valves.  The
timed sequence selection values allow baseline separation of air, methane,
ethylene, acetylene, propane, propylene, benzene, and toluene.  For this pro-
ject, only the methane value was used.  Both sample and background bags were
analyzed to determine the net hydrocarbon emission rates.

     Hydrogen Cyanide (Total Cyanide)

     There is a possibility of hydrogen cyanide (HCN) being produced with a
threeway catalyst system.(16)  Therefore, HCN was measured in Phase I on the
1977 Fury during the durability test phase.  Because the collection and
analysis procedure for HCN will also collect any cyanogen (C2N2) present, the
results are expressed as total cyanide.  The complete collection and analysis
procedure can be found in Reference 17.  Briefly, it involves collecting a
continuous sample of the dilute exhaust in a glass impinger filled with l.ON
potassium hydroxide.  Upon completion of the test, an aliquot of the absorbing
reagent is treated with KH2PO4 and Chloramine-T.  A portion of the resulting
cyanogen chloride is injected into a gas chromatograph equipped with an
electron capture detector  (ECD).  External CN~ standards are used to quantify
results.

     Ammonia
     It is possible for a threeway catalyst to produce ammonia at rich A/F
ratios.  At rich A/F ratios, there is a lack of oxygen and NOX is converted
to NH3 rather than N2-^18^  For this reason, ammonia was measured on the 1977
Fury threeway catalyst car tested in Phase 1 during the durability testing.
The procedure is to pass  a continuous sample of the dilute exhaust through a
glass  impinger containing dilute sulfuric acid.  The ammonia is collected in
the impinger as NH4+.  The solution from the impinger is analyzed for ammonia
using  an ion chromatograph, with the concentration being determined by com-

-------
               Plow Meter
            14.7 litres/min for
            Isokinetic Sample
CVS
Unit
                                Molecular Sieve
                                     Dryer
                                47 mm Fluoropore Sulfate
                                  Collection  Filter
                      .775 cm ID
                                        281 m/min

                                        10 m^/min
                               To
                           Atmosphere
                                                                                 Dilution
                                                                                   Air
                                                                           Filter
                                                                            Pack
                                                                         Heaters
                                                                           LJ.
          21  cm
10.7 cm
                                                                                                Car
                                                                                              Exhaust
                  •46 cm
2 meters
             Figure 3.  Schematic of sulfate sample collection system

-------
parison to standard solutions.   The complete procedure for collection and
analysis of exhaust ammonia can be found in Reference 17.

C.   Durability Test Procedures

     During both Phase I and Phase II of this project, the emission control
systems being evaluated were tested for durability by driving the cars on
which the systems were installed in a specified manner for a specified dis-
tance.  The basic durability distance accumulation procedure is specified in
40 CFR Part 86, paragraph 86.080-26 and Appendix IV to Part 86.  It is often
refered to as the "AMA driving schedule."  The durability driving schedule
listed in Appendix IV of Part 86, was modified by MSAPC Advisory Circular 37,
to permit lower speeds on the last two laps of the schedule, allowing opera-
tion within the speed limit on public roads.  The durability driving course
used at SwRI is shown in Figure 4.  During the durability testing in both
Phase I and Phase II, the 52.3 km driving schedule was driven repeatatively
for two 8-hour shifts per day,  5 days per week.  With allowance for breaks
and meals, approximately 640 km  (400 miles) could be accumulated per day.
A tachograph was installed in each vehicle undergoing distance accumulation
to insure that the driving schedule was being driven correctly.

     Oil level and tire pressure were checked at every shift change.  All
engine and driveline system fluid levels were checked weekly.  Scheduled
maintenance was performed at 12070 km (7500 miles) intervals in accordance
with the applicable vehicle service manual.

     Emission tests were performed every 8050 km  (5000 miles) during the
distance accumulation.

D.   Fuels

     Two types of fuels were used during the project.  The first was a com-
mercially available unleaded regular gasoline with the sulfur level increased
to 0.03 weight percent by the addition of thiophene.  This fuel was used
during the development and optimization testing in both Phase I and II and
for distance accumulation during the durability testing of Phase I.  Since
considerable fuel was required for durability testing, two batches of fuel
were used.  The first, designated EM-237-F, was used for development and
optimization tests in Phase I,  and the first 16100 km of distance accumula-
tion on the 1977 Fury and the first 8050 km on the 1975 Nova.  The second
batch, designated EM-344-F, was used for the remaining durability distance
accumulation in Phase I and all distance accumulation in Phase II.

     The second fuel was a specially blended emissions test fuel, meeting
all of the specifications for the light-duty FTP.  This fuel, designated
EM-274-F,  was used for the final optimization tests on both cars in Phase I
It was used for all emissions tests in Phase II.  An analysis of each fuel
used is presented in Table 1.

-------
                                                                   Events Per Mile
                                                                 55 mph Top Speed
                                  Driving Mode
                           Stops
                           Normal Accelerations from Stop
                           Normal Accelerations from 20 mph
                           Wide-Open Throttle Accelerations
                              and Fast Deceleration
                           Idle Time
SwRI Course*
1.02
1.01
1.11
0.00
13.84 Sec.
AC No. 37
1.01
0.91
1.11
0.10
13.64 Sec.
                                                          * WOT accelerations replaced by
                                                            normal accelerations.
Light
                                                                                          Institute
                                                                                           Road
                                                              South Lap:  "A" to "H" - 4.8 km (3.0 mi)
                                                              North Lap:  "H" to "A" - 4.7 km (2.9 mi)
                                                                     11 Laps = 52.3 km (32.5 mi)
                        Loop
                       410 N.W.
Lap
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Speed
km/hr
64
48
64
64
56
48
56
72
56
89
89
mi/hr
40
30
40
40
35
30
35
45
35
55
55
                      Figure  4.   SwRI Durability  Driving  Course

-------
                                     TABLE 1.  FUEL ANALYSIS
                                          Commercially Available
                                            Unleaded Gasoline
R.V.P., kPa (pounds)

Gravity, g/ml (°API)

Lead, mg/litre (g/gallon)

Sulfur, weight percent

Hydrocarbon Composition, percent
                                        62.7  (9.10)

                                        0.739  (59.9)

                                        1.3  (<0.005)

                                           0.03
61.4 (8.9)

0.745 (58.4)

 0.3 (0.001)

   0.03
                 Gasoline Blended by
                   Howell Refinery

Property
Distillation Range, °C (°F) IBP
10 Pet
50 Pet
90 Pet
EP
Pet Recovered
Pet Residue
Development and
Evaluation
EM-237-F
32 (89)
52 (125)
103 (217)
107 (338)
211 (412)
97.9
1.3
Service
Accumulation
EM-344-F
36 (97)
54 (129)
100 (212)
164 (328)
197 (386)
97.5
1.0
Emissions
Testing
EM-274-F
32 (89)
56 (132)
106 (222)
159 (319)
201 (394)
97.6
1.0
Phosphorus,  mg/litre (g/gallon)

Octane Number
57.2 (8.3)

0.751 (56.9)

 0.3 (0.001)

   0.03
.romatics
Olefins
saturates
gallon)
Research
Motor
26
2
70
<0. «
91
84
.4
.9
.7
0.001)
.4
.5
28
8
64
0.05
91.
83.



(0.0002)
6
2
33
0
65
0.00
97
87
.7
.9
.4
(0
.1
.6



.0000)



-------
             III.  PHASE I - INITIAL EVALUATION, OPTIMIZATION
              AND DURABILITY TESTING OF LOW SULFATE SYSTEMS
     This project conveniently divides into two phases.  The first phase
includes all activities to meet the objective of the project:  the selection
of emission control systems, evaluation, optimization and durability testing
of two low sulfate emission control systems.  This first phase used a 1975
Chevrolet Nova and a 1977 Plymouth Fury as test cars.   Because the two systems
being tested did not meet the durability goals, the durability testing was
halted.  Phase II of the project involved the selection and testing of a dif-
ferent emission control system on another test vehicle.  This section of the
report covers the work done under Phase I of the project.
                                      11

-------
           III-l.   EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM AND VEHICLE  SELECTION
     The first task of the project  was  to  consider  a  variety  of possible
emission control systems proposed for use  in  meeting  future emission stan-
dard and choose two or three for further evaluation.  The  criteria for the
initial evaluation was the possibility  of  meeting gaseous  emissions levels
of 0.26 g/km (0.41 g/mile)  HC,  2.11 g/km (3.4 g/mile) CO,  and 0.93 g/km
(1.5 g/mile)  NOX while maintaining  low  sulfate emissions.  During the
course of the project, the 1977 amendments to the Clean  Air Air were passed,
setting the NOX limits for 1981 and beyond at 0.61  g/km  (1.0  g/mile)  NOX.
While the systems had already been  chosen  at  this time,  the NOX goal was
changed at that time to 0.61 g/km to conform  to the new  statuatory limits.

     A variety of emission control  systems were considered for evaluation,
including oxidation catalyst with modulated air; threeway  catalyst with
feedback fuel system; lean burn system  without oxidation catalyst;  "start
only" catalyst systems; and high temperature  exhaust  systems.   Of these
systems, three were chosen by EPA at the beginning  of the  project for
further evaluation.  The three  systems  chosen were  the oxidation catalyst
with modulated air, high temperature exhaust, and threeway catalyst with
feedback controlled carburetor.  Two of these systems would be selected
for durability testing.

     Initially, it was planned  to obtain two  new "matched" vehicles to use
as test cars for the emission control systems.  However, when the systems
for evaluation were chosen it became obvious  that availability of system
hardware would dictate the selection of the test cars.   Thus,  instead of
two "matched" cars to which systems would  be  fitted,  each  system would be
installed on a test car suited  for  that system. This approach not only
resulted in a better match of emission  control systems and test car, but
it also conserved project funds.

     The high temperature exhaust system would require exhaust port liners.
After a search of moderate effort,  it was  found that  the Chevrolet 5.74
litre  (350 in3) engine was the  most readily adaptable to port liners.  Since
the EPA had, from another project,  a 1975  California  model Chevrolet Nova
with a 5.74 litre engine equipped with  lined  exhaust  ports,  it was decided
to use this car for the high temperature exhaust system  test car.

     While selecting the system components for the  air modulation system,  it
was realized that the 1975 Nova would also be a suitable test car for that
system.  Since it was believed  that the 1975  Nova had accumulated only a  few
thousand kilometers, and could  accommodate either the high temperature exhaust
of air modulation system, it was decided to use it  as one  of the test cars.
                                     12

-------
     At the project inception, there were no intermediate size cars in pro-
duction with threeway catalysts and feedback fuel control systems.  However,
Chrysler Corporation agreed to loan EPA a 1977 Fury, equipped with a 5.90
litre (360 in3) V8 engine and an experimental Holley feedback carburator and
fuel control system.  To complete the system, two 1475 cc (90 in3) threeway
catalysts with a 5 to 1 platinum/rhodium ratio were supplied to EPA by
Engelhard Industries.  Thus, the 1977 Plymouth Fury became the second test
car for the project.

A.   1975 Chevrolet Nova

     The 1975 Nova test car is described in Table 2.  After the car had been
delivered to SwRI, it was discovered that some of the engine systems had
been considerably modified during its use on a previous EPA project.  The
changes are discussed in the final report of that project.(19)  Prior to
use of the car in this study, most of the systems were returned to stock
configuration.  However, some were left in the "as-received" configuration.
The system changes are listed in Table 3.

B.   1977 Plymouth Fury

     A description of the 1977 Plymouth Fury is also included in Table 2.
The car was a stock 1977 Fury, except for the fuel system, catalyst, and
the fact that the EGR and OSAC systems were, while installed, purposely
not operational.  An airpump was also installed, but not operational.   The
air pump, EGR and OSAC system were included for possible use during optimi-
zation testing.

     The feedback controlled carburetor fuel system supplied with the car
was an experimental system developed by Holley carburetor.  The pictorial
schematic in Figure 5 shows the elements of the basic system.  The 02  sensor,
located in the exhaust stream between the engine and the catalyst, produces
a voltage of about 800 millivolts in the absence of oxygen in the exhaust.
This voltage decreases to zero as the oxygen in the exhaust stream increases
from 0 to  1.5 percent.

     The voltage signal from the sensor is the prime control input to the
electronic control unit which provides a square wave output signal of con-
stant frequency, but of variable band width depending on the 02 sensor
voltage.  The ECU is designed so  that at low values of oxygen in the
exhaust (highest level of sensor voltage output), the output signal band
width is the greatest.  Conversely, as the oxygen concentration increases
in the exhaust and the sensor voltage decrease, the band width decreases.

     This variable width output signal operates the vacuum control valve,
which serves to modulate the vacuum that is applied to the carburetor from
the vacuum storage canister.  Because the "on time" of the value is a
function of 02 sensor signal, the modulated vacuum resulting from variable
"on time" is also a function of 0-
                                     13

-------
                TABLE 2.  DESCRIPTION OF TEST CARS
Manufacturer                              Chevrolet        Plymouth

Model                                       Nova             Fury
Model year                                  1975             1977
Vehicle Identification No. (VIN)        1X27L5L119711    RH41K7A115764
Emission family designation                 11K43             N.A.
Engine displacement, litres (cu.in.)      5.74(350)        5.90(360)
No. of cylinders and configuration           V8               V8
Transmission                             3 speed auto.   3 speed auto.

Ignition timing                            6° ETC          10° ETC

Idle rpm                                    600              700
Carburetor                         Rochester "Quadajet"  Holley Model 2245
Rear axle ratio                             3.08             2.45

Tires                                     ER78-14          H78-15

Stock Emission Control System    (Air pump, ox.cat.& EGR)    N.A.

Inertia weight class (Ibs)                  3500            4500
                                 14

-------
                                                  TABLE  3.    COMPONENT  CHANGES  TO  1975  NOVA
                                                                                      Configuration for Contract 68-03-2481
       Component
 1.  Exhaust manifold a


 2.  Exhaust piping

 3.  Oxidation catalyst
     Air injection piping
     system
 5.  Transmission cross
     member

 6.  Transmission control
     rod

 7.  Ignition system
 8.  Choke actuator
     Oil pressure sending
     unit
10.
Early Fuel Evap.  (EFE)
System
                          Contract 68-03-2161 Modifications*

                         Replaced with 1973 prod, nodular
                         iron manifold,  #34622 & 364753

                         Removed, installed "NOX canisters"

                         Removed, installed Engelhard PTX-IIC
                         modified with air injection tube

                         Removed piping, reinstalled new
                         piping system with timer controlled
                         solenoid and temp, control in lines
                         to exhaust ports

                         Replaced with 1973 Impala cross-
                         member

                         Modified
                         Added a time controlled ignition retard
                         with vacuum overide (stopped vacuum
                         signal to dist. for 45 sec. after start)
                         retarding ignition at start

                         Replaced with Delco electric choke
                         with resistor added

                         Replaced with Cadillac unit #6464144
Disabled by wiring valve open and
removing vacuum actuator
                                                                             Stock
                                                                                                      Baseline
                                                                                            High Temp.  Exhaust System
                                        Reinstalled stock
                                        manifolds
                                                                                                 Stock manifolds
                         Returned to '73 manifolds,
                         #34622  & 364753
                                        Reinstalled stock pipes     Installed modified pipes Modified pipes

                                        Reinstalled stock catalyst   Installed 2 monolith     2 Monolith Catalysts
                                                                   catalysts

                                        Replumbed to stock         Stock configuration      Stock configuration
                                        configuration
                                                                      Retained
                                                                 Retained
                                        Returned to stock
                                        configuration
                                                                                                 Retained
                                                                                            Retained
                                                                      Returned to stock
                                                                      configuration
                                                                                                                         Retained
                                                                                                                    Retained
Stock configuration       Stock configuration
                                        Returned to stock           Stock configuration      Stock configuration
                                        configuration

                                        Replaced with stock unit    Stock unit               Stock unit
Stock configuration       Stock configuration

-------
                                            TABLE 3  (Cont'd).    COMPONENT  CHANGES  TO  1975  NOVA
11.  Carburetor               (a) replaced with complete 49 State      (a) retained                (a) retained              (a) retained
                                 carburetor #7045202
                              (b) replaced main jets and metering     (b) retained                (b) retained              (b) retained
                                 rods (new rods of constant
                                 diameter)
                              (c) increased size  of channel restrictors (c) retained                (c) retained              (c) retained
                              (d) To eliminate lean A/F ratio         (d) retained                (d) retained              (d) retained
                                 excursions and minimize extremely
                                 rich excursions, changes may have
                                 been made to accelerator pump
                                 actuation, strobe, nozzle diameter,
                                 power valve orifice and actuation
                                 vacuum
                              (e) Initial choke opening, cold idle       (e) returned to Mfgr's      (e) Mfgr. spec           (e) Mfgr. spec
                                 speed and choke time adjusted to         specifications
                                 give 4-5% CO at start

12.  PCV system              Installed 1.6  MM orifice in line         Retained                   Retained                Retained

13.  EGR valve                Installed dual diaphragm EGR valve      Retained                   Retained                Retained

14.  Cylinder heads            Replaced with heads with exhaust        Returned to stock head     Reinstalled head         Port lined heads
                              port liners                                                         with port liners


•Vehicle originally a 1975 California Nova with 5. 74 litre engine (family LM-1);
 California emission controls including single-diaphragm EGR valve,  air pump and associated
 plumbing and a 4261 cc pelleted cat. ; HEI ignition and automatic transmission.

-------
                                        VACUUM CONTROL VALVE
                                   VACUUM STORAGE CANISTER.
                  COLO START SENSOR
                                 SENSOR TEMP
                                 INDICATOR
Figure 5.   Holley feedback carburetor engine system

-------
     The sensor temperature  indicator,  the  cold  start  sensor,  and  the wide-
open-throttle sensor shown in the  schematic,  can override  the  02 sensor
signal to the ECU so that richer air/fuel ratios are provided  at wide-open-
throttle and cold operating  conditions.

     Figure 6 shows  the two  systems  in  the  carburetor  that are  controlled
by the modulated vacuum.   The idle system is  controlled by providing a
variable air bleed in parallel with  the normal air bleed.

     Control of the  main system is accomplished  by varying the  fuel orifice
in parallel with the main metering jet.  This construction is  a refinement
of today's power enrichment  system.

     In operation, when a high vacuum is applied to the carburetor, it will
tend to meter lean.   This is accomplished when the solenoid has a  high per-
centage of "on1' time.   Conversely, when the solenoid is off or  operating at
a low "on" time level, the control vacuum is  low and the carburetor metering
will enrichen.
                                     18

-------
FEEDBACK CONTROLLED
IDLE AIR BLEED
CONTROL VACUUM
CONNECTION
     FIXED IDLE
      AIR BLEED
                                           MAIN METERING JET
                                           FEEDBACK CONTROLLED
                                           MAIN SYSTEM FUEL
Figure 6.  Feedback carburetor cross-section

-------
        III-2.   EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT AND EVALUATION
     This section covers  the development  and evaluation of two of the three
low sulfate systems chosen for evaluation.   The systems evaluated were:
an oxidation catalyst with modulated air  injection (referred to as the "air
modulation system") and a high temperature  exhaust system.   The third system,
a threeway catalyst with  feedback  fuel control, was selected for system opti-
mization and durability testing prior to  the start of the project.

A.   Air Modulation System Development

     Previous studies conducted at SwRI had indicated that the amount of
air injected into the exhaust before the  catalyst greatly affected the
amount of sulfate produced by the  catalyst.(?)   While bench tests using SO2
did not show changes in sulfate level above approximately two percent,(20,21)
theoretical considerations show that a significant reduction in sulfates
should be possible with decreases  in injected air. '^2)

     In order to meet the 1981 HC  and CO  emission standards a catalyst air
injection system may be required for an oxidation catalyst with the engine
operating at conventionsl A/F ratios.   Thus, for low HC and CO emissions a
high oxygen level is required, while for  low sulfate emissions a low oxygen
level is required.

     In current catalyst air injection systems, the air injected is a function
of engine speed only, with the air pump output increasing as engine speed
increases.  For the catalyst to have sufficient air at all operating conditions,
a great deal of excess air is produced for  some operating conditions.  The
purpose of an air modulation system is to tailor the air injection to provide
air only in the amount needed at any operating condition, minimizing the
excess oxygen and thus the sulfate emissions.

     Investigation of HC and CO emissions from carbureted gasoline fueled
engines at various operating conditions indicate that for a given speed,
emissions generally increase with power.(23)  if the amount of air injected
could be made a function of engine power, it would be possible to more
closely tailor the air injection to catalyst need.

     Since intake manifold vacuum is an indication of engine power, it was
the first parameter considered for a control signal.  Using a vacuum actuated
valve it should be possible to modulate the amount of air supplied to the
catalyst.  Work done at G.M. Research Laboratories had shown successful air
modulation using a control valve on the inlet of the air pump.(24)  it was
therefore decided that the first approach would be to try controlling the
air at the pump inlet.

                                      20

-------
     A control valve was designed and built using manifold vacuum as the
valve actuator.  The valve was then tested on an  air injection system.
Because of air leakage into the pump through shaft seals, etc., it was
not possible to achieve a sufficient reduction in discharge flow.

     The next approach was to control the air pump discharge flow.  Another
air modulation valve was built  by modifying a standard G.M. air pump diver-
ter valve.  Figure 7 shows the standard G.M. diverter valve and the valve
modified for air modulation.  This valve was installed on the test engine
and performed in a satisfactory manner.  Figure 8 shows the percent flow
versus vacuum level.  The relationship of flow to manifold vacuum must,
of course, be tailored to the car chosen as a test vehicle.

     Since the 1975 Nova test car on which the system was to be installed,
was not available at the time the system was ready for test, a rental car
was obtained for use in the development of the air modulation system.
Originally it was planned to use a Chevrolet Nova with a 5.74 litre (350
CID) engine to match the test car to be used for durability testing.
However, a Nova with a 5.74 litre engine was not available from rental
sources.  A 1976 Chevrolet Impala with a 5.74 litre engine was chosen as
the best available alternative.

     The timing and idle speed were set to specification values at the test
series shown in Table 4 run to obtain the stock condition emission levels.
The results of this test series is shown in Table 5.  The FTP emissions  from
the "stock" test were higher than the certification level for this car,
however it was felt that the car would be satisfactory for evaluation and
development of the air modulation system.

     After the "stock" test, an air injection system, including air pump,
necessary plumbing, and exhaust manifolds with air injection ports, was
installed on the engine.  The stock pelleted catalyst was removed.  The
exhaust system was modified to accommodate a monolith catalyst in the
exhaust from each cylinder bank.  The monolith catalysts were new stock
Ford catalysts (part no. D7AZ5E212) used with the 1977 LTD with 5.75 litre
(351 CID) engine.  The car was then driven 160 km (100 miles) to season
the exhaust system.

     A test series was run which was to be the baseline test with a standard
air injection system.  During the testing the catalyst exit temperature,
engine rpm, intake manifold vacuum, CO before the catalyst, and 02 behind
the catalyst, were continuously recorded.

     The CO emissions were reduced with the air injection system and the
CFDS sulfate level increased.  However, the sulfate level was still much
lower than expected.  The HC emissions were not reduced by the addition of
the air injection system.  The catalyst exit temperature was recorded during
all tests and was found to be considerably higher than expected.  The high
catalyst exit temperature, together with the higher than expected HC
emissions indicated an ignition system problem which was later found to be
a spark plug wire arcing to the exhaust manifold.  However, at this time it
                                      21

-------
                           Diaphragm
                           Assembly
                                A
             Diverted Air
               Outlet
               Pressure
             Relief  Valve
Signal Line
 Connection
                                                  Inlet
                                            Outlets to
                                          Exhaust Manifolds
                  Standard G.M. Air  Diverter Valve
To Exhaust
 Manifold
                      Diaphragm
                                                      Intake  Manifold
                                                      Vacuum  Connection
                                                         Air from
                                                         Air Pump
                               Dump to Atmosphere
                        Air Modulation Valve

   Figure 7.  Standard air diverter valve and air modulation valve
                                   22

-------
                                2/4/77 calibration
            100
NJ
CO
       (0
       JG
       X
       0

       +J
       c
       0)
       u
                                               6         8        10        12       14

                                                Manifold Vacuum,  Inches of Mercury
16
18
20
                                  Figure  8.  Air modulation valve calibration

-------
TABLE 4.  AIR MODULATION SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT TEST SEQUENCE


         1.  Precondition, LA-4

         2.  Soak 12 to 20 hours

         3.  FTP - 3 bags for gaseous emissions

         4.  Idle 1 minute (± 15 seconds)

               (a)  auto trans - drive manual - neutral
               (b)  place filter holder in tunnel

         5.  CFDS - 1 gaseous bag
                    1 filter sample

         6.  Engine off - 5 minutes

         7.  HFET - 1 gaseous bag
                            24

-------
                          TABLE 5.  RESULTS OF AIR MODULATION SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT TESTS
  Date
3/17/77
3/30/77
4/01/77
4/06/77
4/19/77
5/05/77
5/10/77
5/18/77
5/26/77
5/30/77
6/02/77
6/06/77
3/17/77
3/30/77
4/01/77
4/06/77
4/19/77
5/05/55
5/10/77
5/18/77
5/26/77
5/30/77
6/02/77
6/06/77
Configuration
Stock
Baseline
w/modulation
w/modulation
w/modulation
Baseline
Baseline
w/modulation
w/modulation
w/modulation
Baseline
Baseline
Stock
Baseline
w/modulation
w/modulation
w/modulation
Baseline
Baseline
w/modulation
w/modulation
w/modulation
Baseline
Baseline
                                          Gaseous emissions g/km  (g/mile)
HC

1.20(1.93)
1.14(1.84)
0.93(1.50)
0.42(0.68)
0.27(0.43)
0.14(0.23)
0.14(0.23)
0.21(0.34)
0.25(0.40)
0.36(0.58)
0.28(0.45)
0.38(0.61)

0.19(.31)
0.57(0.92)
0.50(0.80)
0.05(0.08)
0.10(0.16)
0.05(0.08)
0.08(0.13)
0.05(0.08)
0.08(0.13)
0.07(0.11)
0.11(0.18)
0.07(0.11)
CO
FTP TESTS
10.84(17.44)
1.95(3.14)
2.18(3.51)
4.34(6.98)
8.89(14.30)
0.82(1.33)
0.81(1.30)
0.95(1.53)
1.25(2.02)
3.62(5.82)
1.28(2.06)
1.02(1.64)
CFDS TESTS
5.59(8.99)
3.41(5.49)
5.54(8.91)
1.37(2.20)
5.53(8.90)
0.18(0.29)
0.17(0.27)
0.42(0.68)
2.10(3.40)
1.04(1.67)
0.19(0.31)
0.11(0.18)
NOX

2.03(3.27)
3.02(4.85)
2.41(3.88)
2.39(3.85)
1.67(2.68)
2.22(3.58)
2.06(3.31)
2.22(3.57)
1.43(2.30)
1.42(2.28)
2.09(3.36)
1.60(2.57)

1.89(3.04)
2.66(4.28)
1.85(2.98)
2.44(3.93)
1.69(2.72)
2.44(3.92)
2.07(3.33)
1.81(2.91)
1.13(1.83)
1.11(1.79)
1.47(2.37)
1.51(2.43)
  gm/km
(mg/mile)
                   Fuel
                 VlOO km
                   (mpg)
0.16
3.
1.
1.
1.
  .30
  .08
  .39
  ,52
32.57
37.27
 3.72
 0.60
 0.53
80.49
62.29
(0.26)
(5.31)
(1.74)
(2.24)
(2.45)
(52.40)
(59.98)
(5.99)
(0.97)
(0.86)
(129.51)
(100.22)
               20.34(11.
               21.66(10.
               19.33(12.
               19.62(11,
               19.26(12,
                  99(13.
                  55(13.
                  01(14,
               18.82(12,
               18.28(12,
                17
                17
                16
                    60)
                    90)
                    17)
                    99)
                    21)
                    07)
                    40)
                    69)
                    50)
                    87)
               17.54(13.41)
               17.54(13.41)
(a)
    Baseline configuration is with catalyst air
    injection system without air modulation.

-------
was felt that an initial check of the air modulation system was more impor-
tant than an investigation of possible ignition system problems.

     Following these initial tests, a total of six development tests on the
air modulation system and four additional baseline tests with standard air
injection were performed.   The development testing proceeded in three steps:

     1.   Idle A/F adjusted to specifications, new spark plugs and first
          schedule of air modulation valve prior to tests on April 1 and
          April 6.

     2.   Cold start delay in air modulation additional EGR, and ignition
          system problem corrected prior to test series on April 19.

     3.   In addition to those changes in (2), installation of a centri-
          fugal clutch on the air pump prior to tests on May 26 and May 30.

     Baseline tests with a standard air injection system were run between
steps 1 and 2, and following the completion of the development testing.
The test results from all tests are listed in Table 5.

     As the first step in the system development, the air modulation valve
was inserted in the air injection system between the air pump diverter valve
and the exhaust manifold air injectors and a test series run on April 1,
1977.  Following the test series, an air modulation valve leak was corrected,
new spark plugs installed, and the idle A/F ratio adjusted to specification
using the "lean drop" method.  The "lean drop" method utilized the fact that
engine speed will vary with A/F ratio, at a constant throttle setting.  "For
this case throttle setting is at idle (throttle closed).  The idle mixture
screws are turned in all the way, then turned out, enrichening the mixture
until the engine speed no longer increases.   The curb  idle throttle stop is
adjusted to give an idle speed a certain amount above specification idle
speed  (usually 50-100 rpm).  The mixture screws are then turned in, leaning
the mixture, until the idle speed decreased to the specification valve.
During the next test on April 6, 1977, the cause of the suspected ignition
system malfunction was discovered.  The number 8 spark plug was observed
arcing through the boot to the exhaust manifold.  The spark plug boot was
replaced during the soak period of the FTP and testing continued.  The hot
start portion of the FTP produced much lower catalyst exhaust temperatures
and HC levels.  However, as can be seen from Table 5, the CO and NOX levels
were still considerably above the project goals.

     Following the April 6 test, the raw exhaust gas traces were examined
to determine if the air modulation valve was correctly scheduled.  The
manifold vacuum and engine speed traces from the FTP test without air
modulation, run on March 30, 1977, were read every two seconds and the
values punched on computer cards.  A scatter plot of manifold vaccum and
engine speed pairs was then obtained using a computer plotter.  The plot
is shown in Figure 9.  The CO trace from the same test was examined and
the CO levels above 1 percent manually plotted on the graph.  The CO levels
above 1 percent for the first three minutes are shown as unshaded symbols;
                                     26

-------
  5       ENGINE  OPERflTION  - CHEV.  350 ON FTP
  o
   •

  M
   4%
                              HI'
                                                o;
                     I  1 1 1
                                   v
                                 '•', '
                                 1  1 1  1 1 1
                  i'lF  .'   J  ,  A*m    S
                   I   .    .  ' , A fyfc,   ..'•
                      ' 10
                                        i i
                      ,
                          '     '
                              ,   ,;.,.>
                                                   ™   ,  i
                                                 i   i      i

                                                    i .    '
                                                    i
                                                        *  i
                              IA
                                         II      I       I
                                             I I .     .  A
                                         I
1 A 1 , A 1
1 ;• :
•* A
ii
A
i
,'•*
'A
• ' i ' *
1 A A
   0.00       40.00      80.00       120.00      160.00     COO. 00
                   ENGINE  SPEED  RPM      *10l
      Figure 9 .  Manifold vacuum as a function of engine speed during
                      FTP test on 1976 Impala
                                                          £40.00
                              27

-------
the remainder of the test as  shaded symbols.   The area of high CO  was  then
compared to the modulation valve  schedule,  Figure 8.

     Examination of Figure 8  and  9  indicated  that the modulation valve
schedule was satisfactory for that  stage  of development,  but that  full air
to the catalyst was needed during approximately  the first three minutes of
the cold start.  It also appeared that  some air  was needed at vacuum levels
up to 18 to 20 inches of mercury  at higher  engine speeds,  but not  at idle
speed.

     To obtain full air injection during  the  cold start portion of the FTP,
the vacuum chamber of the modulation valve  needed to be opened to  the atmos-
phere during the first three  minutes of the cold start.  To provide air at
higher engine speeds, but not at  idle,  it was decided to  use a centrifugal
clutch on the air pump to disengage the air pump when the engine was idling.

     Step two of the development  process  was  to  install and test the cold
start hardware.  The main part of the system  was a solenoid valve  installed
in the vacuum to the air modulation valve.  A time delay  relay actuated
the solenoid valve.  The time delay relay was set at  approximately 2-1/2
minutes.  The vacuum system to the  solenoid valve was plumbed in such a way
that full air was admitted to the exhaust system until the solenoid was
actuated, at which time the air injection was modulated by the manifold
vacuum signal.

     Also during this step, a dual  diaphragm  EGR valve was installed on the
engine in an effort to reduce NOX to the  project goal.  The dual diaphragm
EGR valve is constructed such that  for  high intake manifold vacuum levels,
as would be experienced in cruising, the  valve opening is less than for
low manifold vacuums obtained during accelerations.   Thus,  the valve is
capable of providing more recirculation on  acceleration than the standard
EGR valve.

     The next series of development tests was run on  April 19, 1977.   The
test results, listed in Table 5,  showed a reduction of HC and NOX.   Exami-
nation of the before catalyst CO  trace  revealed  a need for further adjust-
ment to the idle CO level.

     At that point in the development testing it was  felt that another
baseline test with the standard air injection system should be run to
evaluate the effects of catalyst  seasoning  in sulfate emissions.  The car
was first driven 161 km (100  miles)  on  suburban  expressways as a quick
mileage accumulation, then tested on May  5  and 10, 1977 using the  FTP and
CFDS test cycles.  The sulfate emissions  from the two CFDS tests averaged
34.92 mgAm/ which is ten times the initial baseline  CFDS sulfates.  It
was obvious that the lower sulfates from  the  initial  CFDS baseline test
with standard air injection were  the result of having an  unseasoned cata-
lyst.  Thus, the second baseline  CFDS sulfate levels  were used as  the
standard air injection system levels.
                                     28

-------
     The third step of the development testing was to install the air pump
centrifugal clutch.  The centrifugal clutch used was a modified small gaso-
line engine clutch manufactured by Mercury Clutch Division of Aspro,  Inc.,
Model No. GW8-30.  It was modified to have the pulley as the driving element
rather than the shaft.  A cross-section sketch of the modified clutch is
shown in Figure 10.

     The time delay relay actuated solenoid valve in the vacuum line to the
air modulation valve was replaced with engine coolant temperature switch
identical to the EGR vacuum signal switch that is stock equipment on the
car.  This was accomplished by installing a pipe tee in the EGR switch
location and fitting an EGR switch in both ends of the tee.

     The air modulation system then consisted of three additional elements
in a standard air injection system.  These elements were:

     • A centrifugal clutch on the air pump pulley sheave

     • A manifold vacuum actuated air modulation valve

     • A coolant temperature controlled switch in the vacuum line to
       the air modulation valve.

     Figure 11 is a sketch of the system showing the various elements.
After installing the system on the car, it was driven 161 km and tested
on May 18, 1977 using the FTP and CFDS cycles.  The CFDS sulfate emissions
from this test was 3.7 mg/km.  This large decrease in sulfate emissions
was taken to indicate that the air injection system did indeed have poten-
tial as a method to reduce sulfate emissions.  The complete results from
these tests are also given in Table 5.

     At this time, it was felt that the system was ready for the final
demonstration test series:  805 km on the AMA durability driving schedule;
a test series consisting of an FTP, CFDS, and HFET; 480 km on the AMA
durability schedule; and a repeat of the test series.  This was to be done
with both the standard air injection system and the modulated air injection
system.  Since the modulated air injection system was installed on the car,
it was tested first.  The results of the replicate tests run on May 26 and
30, 1977 are shown in Table 5.

     The sulfate levels from the CFDS were surprisingly low, being 0.60 mg/km
for the first CFDS and 0.53 mg/km for the second CFDS.  This is an average
98 percent reduction in sulfates from two previous tests with the standard
air injection system.

     The air modulation system was then removed from the test car.  The
emission control systems were then in stock 1976 Federal configurations
except for:
                                     29

-------
                Driving  Parts
Driven Parts
                Bearings  and  Clutch  Shoes
                                   Pulley  Sheave
Air Pump
 Shaft
                                                       Spring
                                                          Clutch Shoes
              Figure 10.   Cross section of centrifugal clutch
                                    30

-------
                Air Modulation Valve
                                         thermal vacuum switch
                                      centrifugal  clutch
(items added to standard injection system are  in  large print)
        Figure 11.   Modulated air  injection system
                            31

-------
     •  a dual diaphragm EGR valve in the EGR system,-

     •  two monolith catalyst in place of the one pelleted catalyst,  and

     •  a standard air injection system.

     With the car in this configuration, it was driven 805 km on the AMA
durability driving schedule, then tested for sulfate  and gaseous emissions.
The test series consisted of an FTP, CFDS and HFET.   Following these tests,
the car was driven 483 km on the AMA. schedule and the test series repeated.
The test results are shown in Table 5.

     Recall that the FTP emission level goals for this project are 0.25 g/km
HC, 2.11 g/km CO, and 0.93 g/km NOX.  While no goal was set for sulfates,
it has been agreed that a practical target level was  3.11 mg/km or less.
The car without air modulation met the goal for CO only.   When equipped
with air modulation, the car met the sulfate target but none of the gaseous
emissions goals.

     The air modulation system had demonstrated its ability to reduce sulfate
emissions.  While the gaseous goals were not met, the FTP gaseous emissions
were close enough to the goals to indicate that with  additional adjustments
to the engine and air modulation system, the gaseous  emission goals could
be met, while keeping the sulfates below the target of 3.11 mg/km.

     It was felt that sufficient testing had been done to successfully
demonstrate the effectiveness of the air modulation system so that this
series of tests concluded the system development phase.

B.   High Temperature Exhaust System Development

     Theoretical analysis and laboratory tests have shown that the amount
of exhaust S02 converted to sulfate in an oxidation  catalyst system decreases
as temperature increases.'^0,25)  ^ increase in exhaust temperature at the
catalyst from 480° to 540°C (900°F to 1000°F) could theoretically result
in a 30 to 40 percent reduction in sulfate emissions.

     Raising the catalyst inlet temperature then becomes an attractive
technique for control of sulfate emissions, particularly if the temperature
increase can be accomploshed by heat conservation techniques alone.  As one
of the emission control systems to be evaluated for  this project, a high
temperature exhaust system was to be designed and built.  This system was
to rely on heat conservation techniques, with a target temperature increase
of 80°C  (approximately 150°F).

     To accomplish this objective three changes were  proposed to the exhaust
system:

     • Install exhaust port liners in the engine heads

     • Use insulated exhaust manifolds

     • Mount the catalysts  as close as possible to the exhaust manifold

                                      32

-------
     Published studies indicated that by far the most effective means of
conserving exhaust heat is by the use of exhaust port liners.  (19/26)
Since heads with exhaust port liners were available for a Chevrolet 5.7
litre (350 CID) engine, the 1975 Nova described in Section II  was used as
the test car for the high temperature exhaust system evaluation.  The in-
sulated exhaust manifold and port liners were to be tested separately and
in combination so that the contribution of each component could be evaluated.
In addition, the stock pelleted catalysts were to be replaced  with monolith
catalysts, which had shown a somewhat lower sulfate storage capacity in a
previous project. ^7^

     For the insulated manifolds, a decision was made against  merely
insulating the stock exhaust manifolds, since it was felt that the stock
nodular cast iron manifolds would have a tendency to crack when insulated.
It was therefore decided to design and fabricate a set of exhaust manifolds
specifically for this project.
                                                 / 'jfi \
     A study of port liners by Ford Motor Company     had indicated that
air gap insulation gave the lowest heat loss of several techniques evalu-
ated.  It was felt that for the exhaust manifold also, air gap insulation
would give the lowest heat rejection.  The insulated exhaust manifold
should also have low thermal inertia to keep the start up exhaust tempera-
ture as hot as possible.

     Using these criteria, a set of welded stainless steel exhaust manifolds
were designed with a 19 cm (0.75 in) air gap.  Photographs of  the manifolds
are shown in Figure 12.

     The manifold weldments were fabricated and installed prior to installing
the heads with exhaust port liners so that the effects of the  insulated mani-
folds alone could be evaluated.  To conserve badly needed time, the insulated
manifolds were evaluated with the stock exhaust pipe and pelleted catalyst,
since the exhaust system with the two monolith catalysts was still being
fabricated.

     Table 6 shows the test results of the test series with the stock ex-
haust manifolds and exhaust system and series with the insulated exhaust
manifolds.  The temperature data from the test series with the SwRI built
insulated exhaust manifolds indicated that these manifolds were only
marginally successful in increasing the exhaust gas temperature into the
catalyst.  The FTP test with insulated manifolds showed only a 7°C(12°F)
increase over the stock manifold FTP temperature.

     When the temperature traces from the two tests were compared, the
insulated manifolds were found to produce hotter exhaust gas temperatures
during the cold start 505 second portion of the FTP test.  The exhaust
temperature difference between the two systems began to decrease after
505 seconds.  It continued to decrease until the end .of the test, when
the exhaust temperature using stock manifolds was actually higher than
the exhaust temperature from the insulated manifolds.
                                     33

-------
Figure 12.  Air gap insulated exhaust manifolds
                     34

-------
                         TABLE  6.   RESULTS FROM INSULATED MANIFOLD TESTS WITH PELLETED CATALYST

Date
c /i -i /-in
H2S04 Average
Test Gaseous Emissions qAm (q/mile) rag/km Exhaust
Type Configuration HC CO NOX (ma/mile) Temp°Cta'
CTTTD c-t-^>^b- n OT /A oc^ ID) n *,« /o -30 \ n 11 1 1 o/i\ — 	 /ITT /DQO\ 1 7
Fuel
&/100 km(mpg)
•?fi n •? fi?i
    5/13/77   CFDS  Stock


    6/10/77   FTP   w/ins.exh.(c)


    6/10/77   CFDS(d)  w/ins.exh.
                                0.03  (0.05)    0.23  (0.37)   0.81  (1.30)


                                0.34  (0.55)    1.72  (2.77)   0.77  (1.24)


                                0.21  (0.34)    3.57  (5.74)   0.45  (0.72)
7.11 (11.44)   545 (1013)  14.05  (16.74)


	    479 (894)    18.87  (12.46)


14.51 (23.35)  517 <962/b)  17.06  (13.79)
00
Ln
3 average temperature at exhaust manifold exit
b left cylinder bank only  (cylinders 1,3,5,7).  See Note  d.

  insulated exhaust manifolds installed
  two spark plugs misfiring during this test

-------
     The CFDS tests with the SwRI insulated manifolds had a 28°C (50°F)
lower average temperature than the CFDS tests with stock manifolds.   During
the CFDS tests with the insulated manifolds the numbers six and eight spark
plugs were observed arcing through the boot to the manifold.  Since  these
cylinders exhaust into the right hand manifold, only the left cylinder bank
exhaust temperature was used for the CFDS comparison.

     The HC and CO emissions and fuel consumption from the CFDS test with
the insulated manifolds are higher, and the NOX emissions are lower than
the CFDS test with the stock exhaust system, as would be expected with the
misfiring cylinder.

     From the temperature data of these two test series, it appears  that
insulated manifolds give higher exhaust temperatures during cold engine
operation only.  During stop and go driving, as represented by the stabi-
lized portion of the FTP, the stock cast exhaust manifolds apparently give
up some stored heat during low power and idle operation.  This raises the
temperature from the stock manifolds above the temperature from the  insulated
manifolds, which being less massive than the stock manifolds, have a smaller
heat storage capacity.

     As was pointed out earlier, these tests were run with a stock pelleted
catalyst, rather than the monolith catalysts planned for use with the high
temperature system.  Pelleted catalysts are capable of considerable  sulfate
storage and subsequent release.  Since no attempt was made to duplicate
the long term preconditioning, no comparison should be attempted between
the sulfate emissions of the two CFDS tests run on May 13 and June 10.

     Following these tests, the stock exhaust manifolds were reinstalled
and the pelleted catalyst was replaced with two monolith catalysts ,  one for
each cylinder bank.  The car was driven for 805 km on the AMA durability
driving schedule.  It was then tested twice (June 28, and July 1, 1977)
using the development test sequence (FTP, CFDS, HFET) with 483 km durability
driving between the two test series.  This test series was designated as
the baseline test.  The cylinder heads with exhaust port liners were then
installed together with the exhaust manifolds supplied with the heads.
 (1973 production nodular iron manifolds).  The car was again driven for
805 km of durability and the test sequence repeated twice (July 20 and 22,
1977) with 483 km of durability between test sequences.  The results of
these tests are shown in Table 7.

     The average gaseous emissions from the two baseline FTP tests and
the average of the two FTP tests with port liners were within the project
goals as they were prior to changing the NOX goal  (0.25 g/km HC, 2.11 g/km
CO, 0.93 g/km NOX).  However, one of the baseline FTP tests had a NOX
level slightly above the goal level.  One FTP test with port liners had
both CO and NOX levels slightly above the goals.

     The exhaust temperature for all tests with port liners were higher than
the exhaust temperatures from the same test type without exhaust port liners.
CFDS tests v.ith the port liners had an average sulfate emission level approi-
mately  37 percent  less than the average baseline CFDS sulfate level.

                                      36

-------
                TABLE 7.   RESULTS FROM BASELINE AND TESTS WITH PORT LINERS AND MONOLITH CATALYSTS
Date
6/28/77
7/1/77
Average
6/28/77
7/1/77
Average
6/28/77
7/1/77
Average
w 7/20/77
^ 7/22/77
Average
7/20/77
7/22/77
Average
7/20/77
7/22/77
Average
Test
Type
FTP
FTP

CFDS
CFDS

FET
FET

FTP
FTP

CFDS
CFDS

FET
FET

Gaseous Emissions, g/km (g/mile)
Configuration
Baseline
Baseline

Baseline
Baseline

Baseline
Baseline

b
w/liners
w/liners

w/liners
w/liners

w/liners
w/liners

HC
0.19(0.31)
0.19(0.31)
0.19(0.31)
0.05(0.08)
0.06(0.10)
0.06(0.09)
0.04(0.06)
0.03(0.05)
0.03(0.05)
0.15(0.24)
0.18(0.29)
0.16(0.26)
0.04(0.06)
0.04(0.06)
0.04(0.06
0.02(0.03)
0.02(0.03)
0.02(0.03)
CO
1.25(2.01)
1.24(2.00)
1.24(2.00)
0.20(0.32)
0.21(0.34)
0.20(0.33)
0.13(0.21)
0.12(0.19)
0.12(0.20)
1.85(2.98)
2.25(3.62)
2.05(3.30)
0.57(0.92)
0.55(0.88)
0.56(0.90)
0.10(0.16)
0.24(0.39)
0.17(0.28)
NOX
0.77(1.24)
0.94(1.51)
0.86(1.38)
0.73(1.17)
0.87(1.40)
0.80(1.29)
0.78(1.26)
0.91(1.46)
0.84(1.36)
0.78(1.25)
0.95(1.53)
0.86(1.39)
0.82(1.32)
0.99(1.59)
0.90(1.46)
0.88(1.42)
1.05(1.69)
0.96(1.56)
H2S04
mg/km
(Vig/mi)
3.04(4.89)
0.11(0.18)
1.58(2.54)
11.52(18.54)
8.53(13.73)
10.03(16.14)
27.54(44.31)
26.18(42.12)
26.86(43.22)
1.11(1.79)
0.40(0.64)
0.76(1.22)
5.43(8.74)
7.16(11.52)
6.30(10.13)
18.66(30.02)
18.05(29.04)
18.36(29.53)
Avg . Exh.
Temp.
°C (°F)a
456(852)
445(834)
450(843)
545(1013)
520(968)
532(990)
573(1063)
573(1063)
573(1063)
526(979)
519(967)
522(973)
608(1126)
606(1123)
607(1124)
651(1204)
657(1214)
654(1209)
Fuel
V100 km(mpg)
17.54(13.41)
17.24(13.64)
17.39(13.53)
13.95(16.86)
13.44(17.50)
13.70(17.18)
12.60(18.69)
12.82(18.35)
12.71(18.52)
17.86(13.17)
18.52(12.70)
18.19(12.94)
13.81(17.03)
13.86(16.97)
13.84(17.00)
13.04(18.04)
13.26(17.74)
13.15(17.89)
 Average temperature at exhaust manifold exit
DExhaust port liners installed

-------
     While this is a considerable decrease in sulfate emissions,  two facts
should be pointed out.   The first is that the baseline CFDS sulfate emis-
sions are lower than average for a car with air injection.  The EPA sulfate
baseline study showed an average of 17.7 mg/km for oxidation catalyst cars
with air injection.(5)   The second fact is that even with a 37 percent
reduction, the CFDS sulfate emissions from tests with the port liners are
still somewhat above the target level of 3.1 mg/km.

     The percent conversion of fuel sulfur to sulfate for the CFDS and HFET
tests listed in Table 7 are shown in Figure 13 as a function of exhaust tem-
perature.  Also shown on the figure is a theoretical equilibrium curve for
two percent excess oxygen and a curve showing laboratory test results for
a catalyst with 50,000 hr"1 space velocity.  Both of these curves are from
Reference 20.  From the figure, it can be seen that the actual rate of
decrease in sulfate emissions with temperature is considerably less than
the theoretical equilibrium rate.  From examination of the figure, it
appears that an additional exhaust temperature increase of approximately
70°C  (126°F) would be required to obtain the target sulfate level.  In an
attempt to reach the target sulfate levels, the insulated exhaust manifolds
were installed on the car and the test procedure repeated.  The temperature
as the exit of the exhaust manifold (left side)  is shown in Table 8 for the
tests with and without the insulated manifolds.

     TABLE 8.  EXHAUST TEMPERATURE WITH AND WITHOUT INSULATED MANIFOLDS
                  Date
Test Type   	

   FTP      7/20 & 7/22 (Avg.)


   FTP          8/15/77


   SET      7/20 & 7/22 (Avg.)


   SET          8/15/77
  Configuration

w/o insulated man.
w/liners

w/insulated man.
w/liners

w/o insulated man.
w/liners

w/insulated man.
w/liners
Exhaust Manifold
  Exit Temp. °C

   522 (973°F)
                                                         522 (972°F)
                                                         607 (1124°F)
                                                         595 (1103°F)
     It is evident that the insulated manifolds had little affect on the
exhaust temperature.  This is not to say that exhaust manifolds could not
be built that would give increased exhaust temperature.  However, these
test results do indicate that successful design of such manifolds requires
more time and effort than programmed under this study.

     Since there was little difference in temperature with insulated mani-
folds, the test results with port liners alone were used to evaluate the
potential of the high temperature exhaust system.  Development testing of
the high temperature exhaust system was therefore brought to a close.
                                      38

-------
From
Reference 20
                              Theoretical Equilibrium line (with  2% excess
                              Bench test of monolith catalyst with 50000 hr"l
                              space velocity
                 SET

                   O
                   FET
Dates
                     •    6/28/77 and 7/1/77
                                   7/20/77 and 7/22/77
  100


   90

   80


S  70
s
3  60
13
•M
w  50
c
O
        w  30
         o>
           20
           10
                           !-H.r
                              Hii
                          ft!
              300
                400         500         600
                        Temperature,  °C
                      700
800
          Figure 13.  Conversion of fuel sulfur to H2SO4 for baseline
                   and high temperature tests of 1975 Nova
                                      39

-------
C.   Emission Control System Rating

     Only one of the two systems evaluated was to be tested for durability.
Therefore, some method of rating each system was needed so that the best
system was chosen for durability testing.   The systems were rank ordered,
based on an assigned numerical value for each system.   This numerical value
was obtained by assigning a number between one and ten for each of several
evaluation parameters, then summing the individual numbers to obtain a
single number of each system.

     The parameters considered were gaseous emissions, sulfate emissions,
fuel economy, estimated durability, and estimated cost.   Gaseous emissions
were based on the 1975 FTP (LA-4 cycle) , sulfate emissions on the CFDS
cycle, and fuel economy on the city and the highway cycle.

     Each of the parameters considered had a different scoring criteria.
Basically, the higher the score, the more  desirable (lower cost, better
durability, lower emissions,  etc.)  the control system.  Individual para-
meter scores were multiplied by a weighting factor, indicating the rela-
tive importance of each parameter.   The weighting factors were subjective,
but did serve to give more emphasis to the more important evaluation items.
The scoring criteria for each individual item is shown in Table 9.

     The evaluation scores of the two systems are shown in Table 10.   An
explanation of each score is contained in  Appendix A.   Since  the air
modulation system scored highest in the evaluation, it was chosen for
further optimization and durability testing.
                                     40

-------
                         TABLE 9.  EVALUATION SCORING CRITERIA
   Evaluation Item
1.  Gaseous Emissions
2.  Sulfate Emissions
3.  Fuel Economy
4.  Durability
5.  Cost
           Scoring Criteria
                                                  Weighting
                                          Score    Factor
(a)   HC,  CO,  NOX below 0.25, 2.11 and
     0.93 g/km respectively
(b)   Only one of the gaseous emissions
     is over  the goal and it does not
     exceed the goal by more than 50%
(c)   More than one of the gaseous emis-
     sions is over the goal
                                                     2.0
                                                                     10


                                                                      5

                                                                      0
(a)   3.1 mg/km or less on CFDS test        10
(b)   Greater than 6.2 mg/km                 0
(c)   Between 3.1 and 6.2 mg/km      (3.226-SO  mg/km)
                                                     1.5
(a)   Fuel economy improved by more
(b)   Fuel economy i5%
(c)   Fuel economy  decreased by more
     than 5%
                                           10
                                            5

                                            0
(a)   Estimate life of system without,    miles
                              repairs or  replacement  (only    V50,000 x 10'
                              addition parts added  for  sulfate
                              control - not total system).
(a)   Least cost system

(b)   For other systems
                                           10

                                   least cost
                                  system cost
1.0
                                                     1.0
                                                                               1.0
                                             41

-------
TABLE 10.  EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM EVALUATION RATINGS


1.
2.
3.
4.
5.

Evaluation Item

Meets gaseous
emission goals
Sulfate emissions
Fuel economy
Durability
Cost
TOTAL SCORE
Weighting
Score Factor
Air Modulation
5 2.0
10 1.5
5 1.5
5 1.0
10 1.0
	
Weighted
Score
System
10
15
7.5
5
10
47.5
Max. Possible
Weighted Score

(20)
(15)
(15)
(10)
(10)
(70)
High Temperature Exhaust System
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.

Meets gaseous
emission goals
Sulfate emissions
Fuel economy
Durability
Cost
TOTAL SCORE
10 2.0
0 1.5
5 1.5
10 1.0
3.3 1.0
	
20
0
7.5
10
3.3
40.8
(20)
(15)
(15)
(10)
(10)
(70)
                            42

-------
                III-3.  AIR MODULATION SYSTEM-OPTIMIZATION
                          AND DURABILITY TESTING
     The air modulation concept was proven on the 1976 Chevrolet Impala
and chosen as one of the systems to be optimized and tested for durability.
The complete air modulation system was therefore installed on the durability
test car, the 1975 Nova described in Section II, and optimization of the
system begun.

A.   Air Modulation System Optimization

     Since the basic car was not designed to meet 1981 standards, consi-
derable work was required to bring the gaseous emissions within the project
goals.  The steps to reaching the project goals were:

     1.   Installed heads with exhaust port liners

     2.   Reinstalled stock head without port liners

     3.   Installed new rear axle (changed from 3.08 to 2.56 ratio)

     4.   Changed timing from 6° to 8° BTC and increased EGR

     5.   Installed new carburetor, increased EGR

     6.   Installed new intake manifold and increased EGR valve orifice
          to 12.8 mm

     When the air modulation system was installed on the Nova, considerable
testing was required to adjust the air modulation valve.  The intake mani-
fold vacuum range for the Nova was smaller than the vacuum range of the 1976
Impala on which the system was developed, necessitating a change in the size
of the valve vacuum chamber and spring.

     Since the high temperature exhaust system had just completed evaluation
on the 1975 Nova, the cylinder heads with exhaust port liners were still
installed.  These heads were left in place to determine if the port liners
would help reduce the CO emissions.  Eleven tests were performed using the
cylinder heads with exhaust port liners.  The results from the test with
the lowest overall emissions (9/30/77) are listed in Table 11.  As can be
seen, the car did not meet the CO or NOX emission goals in that configuration.

     On examination of test data with the stock emission control system,
it was found that the stock cylinder heads, without port liners had lower
CO emissions than the heads with liners.  The reason for this difference
was not evident, but was assumed to be a function of some difference in
head geometry.  It was therefore decided to reinstall the stock cylinder
heads and continue the optimization testing.

                                     43

-------
             TABLE 11.  FTP TEST RESULTS FOR AIR MODULATION SYSTEM INSTALLED ON 1975 NOVA
                                               Gaseous Emissions g/km  (g/mile)
  Date
9/30/77
11/3/77
11/4/77

11/29/77

11/30/77


12/12/77

12/30/77


1/16/78


1/18/78


1/31/78
      Configuration
    HC
CO
NO,
w/liners  & air mod.
std. head w/o air mod.
std. heads & air mod.

std. head, 2.56 axle
 w/air mod.
std. head, 2.56 axle
 w/air mod.

increased EGR, 8°BTC

new intake manifold,
new carb., inc. EGR, 8° BTC

new intake manifold,
12.8 mm EGR, 9°BTC

new intake manifold,
12.8 mm EGR, 9°BTC

new intake manifold,
12.8 mm EGR, 9°BTC
0.19(0.31)    2.75(4.42)    0.76(1.22)
0.21(0.34)    1.86(2.99)    0.85(1.37)
0.23(0.37)    2.54(4.09)    0.79(1.27)
     Fuel
a/100 km (mpg)

 16.95(13.88)
 16.95(13.89)
 17.86(13.17)
0.20(0.32)    1.42(2.28)    0.89(1.43)    16.13(14.58)

0.22(0.35)    3.38(5.44)    0.81(1.30)    16.67(14.11)

0.18(0.29)    2.84(4.57)    0.64(1.03)    17.24(13.64)


0.28(0.45)    1.86(2.99)    0.62(1.00)    17.09(13.76)


0.19(0.31)    0.93(1.49)    0.55(0.89)    17.22(13.66)


0.19(0.31)    0.92(1.49)    0.59(0.91)    17.19(13.68)


0.19(0.31)    1.03(1.65)    0.48(0.77)    17.54(13.41)

-------
     Seven cold start FTP tests were run in this configuration.   The test
on 11/4/77 produced the best overall emissions. However, CO and NOX were
still above the project goals as shown in Table 11.

     The third step of the optimization procedure was to change  the rear
axle ratio in an effort to lower CO emissions and improve fuel economy.   A
test without the air modulation system showed a reduction in CO and an im-
provement of approximately five percent in fuel economy.  When a test was
run on 11/30/77 with the air modulation system installed, the CO increased
to a level above the best test with the original axle ratio.  While not
realized at the time, this was the result of an intermittent carburetor
problem which would continue to hinder the optimization effort.

     Since the 11/30/77 test demonstrated CO and NOX emissions above the
project goals, it was decided that additional changes were required.  The
EGR valve flow area was enlarged to increase the amount of EGR.   The car-
buretor accelerator pump stroke was shortened and the ignition timing
advanced to 8° BTC.  This configuration constituted the forth step in the
optimization procedure.

     Six tests were run in this configuration, with the idle CO set at
various A/F ratios.  The best overall emissions were obtained from the
12/12/77 test.  The CO and NOX emissions were still above the project
goals as shown in Table 11.  However, there was a decrease in NOX compared
to previous tests.

     After examining the CO traces from tests during Steps 3 and 4, it was
evident that there was an intermittent problem with the carburetor, con-
fusing the interpretation of the test results.  The carburetor on the car
had undergone extensive modification during a previous EPA project.  It
was felt that returning to a stock carburetor would improve the  test-to-test
repeatability.

     A new Rochester "Quadajet" four barrel carburetor, part number 17054703,
was installed.  The amount of EGR was also increased.  This configuration
was the fifth step of optimization.  Three tests were run in this configu-
ration.  The best emissions were obtained from the 12/30/77 test, listed in
Table 11.  For the first time, both CO and NOX met the project goals, how-
ever HC was slightly above the project goal.

     The last step in the optimization process was to install an aluminum
Edelbrock "Streetmaster II" single plane intake manifold in an effort to
decrease the time for the intake manifold to reach operating temperature.
The timing was also advanced to 9° BTC.  The EGR valve metering rod diameter
was reduced to increase EGR.  To further increase EGR, a new EGR valve
orifice, 12.5 mm in diameter, was installed to place of the 10 mm orifice
that had been used.  An FTP test with this configuration was run on 1/16/78,
with a replicate test run on 1/18/78.  These tests met all gaseous emission
goals with a sufficient margin for deterioration during durability testing.
                                     45

-------
     The car was driven for 320 km (200 miles)  on the AMA durability route
to season the catalyst at the new exhaust oxygen level.  A complete series
of tests (FTP, CFDS, FET)  was then run on 1/31/78 to determine the sulfate
emissions.   The CFDS sulfuric acid emissions were 3.85 mg/km (6.19 mg/mile).
This was a 62% reduction from the Nova baseline obtained during the high
temperature exhaust study (see Table 7).   While the sulfate emissions were
slightly above the 3.1 mg/km project goal, it was decided that they were
low enough to proceed with the durability testing.

B.   Air Modulation System Durability Testing

     Following optimization of the air modulation system, the car was readied
for durability testing.  During a previous EPA project, the car had been
driven 14160 km (8800 miles).  By the end of optimization testing of the air
modulation system, the 1975 Nova had accumulated a total of 19630 km
(12200 miles).  This represents a significant amount of use for the basic
engine systems; therefore a minor overhaul was performed to bring the engine
as close to a "zero miles" condition as possible.  The overhaul consisted of
the following maintenance items.

     • Remove heads and remove deposits from top of piston

     • Remove deposits from head, soak head in solvent, lap valves in
       seats and reinstall heads

     • Clean inside of exhaust manifolds and reinstall

     • Replace spark plugs and ignition wires

     • Replace catalysts

     • Replace manifold air injection tubes

     . Change oil and oil filter

     • Set timing 10° ETC and idle speed to 600 rpm

     Following this minor overhaul, the car was driven for 322 km  (200 miles)
on the AMA durability schedule.  Two replicate test series constituting the
"zero kilometer" test were then performed.

     Nova Distance Accumulation Chronology

     With the zero kilometer tests on 2/28/78, the durability testing on the
1975 Nova with the air modulation system was begun.  A replicate emissions,
zero kilometer, test was run on 3/2/78.  Distance accumulation began on
March 9, 1978.  The car was driven on the distance accumulation course
shown in Figure 4,  Section  II,  for two 8-hour shifts per day, 5 day per week.
Approximately 640 km  (400 miles) were  accumulated each day.  Duplicate
emission tests were performed every 8050 km, with 805 km  (500 miles) of
the durability driving schedule accumulated between the first and second
test series to provide equivalent catalyst sulfate conditioning.

                                      46

-------
     Scheduled maintanance was performed every 12,070 km  (7500 miles) as
specified in the 1975 Chevrolet Service Manual.  A summary of the required
maintenance is shown in Table 12.

     Durability distance accumulation continued until 28435 km (17673 miles),
at which time the durability testing was stopped because all FTP gaseous
emissions were at or above the project goals, with no possibility of de-
creasing as distance accumulation continued.  A graphical representation
of the distance accumulation records is presented in Figure 14.  The figure
shows daily distance, maintenance and emissions test points.

     Nova Fuel and Oil Consumption

     The average fuel and oil consumption for the interval between each
emission test is shown in Table 13.  The fuel consumption is quite con-
sistent between emissions test and at the level expected from FTP and HFET
tests during the optimization.  Since there were only 5 quarts (4.7 litres)
of oil added between oil changes during the 28435 km of durability testing,
the oil consumption in each interval appears somewhat erratic, depending on
when the oil was added.

                TABLE 13.  FUEL AND OIL CONSUMPTION DURING
                     DURABILITY TESTING FOR 1975 NOVA
     Distance                    Fuel                 Oil Consumption
Interval, km  (mile)         &/100 km  (mpg)         VlOOO km (qt/1000 mi)

       0-8050
       (0-10000)              15.50(15.18)               0.261(0.444)

    8050-16100
    (5000-10000)              15.61(15.07)               no oil added

    16100-24150
   (10000-15000)              15.17(15.51)               0.513(0.873)
       0-24150               15.48(15.20)               0.166(0.283)
       (0-15000)

However, the overall oil consumption of 0.17 H/1000 km  (0.28 qts/1000 miles)
is considered somewhat better than average.

     Nova Emission Rest Results

     The average results from the four duplicate emission test series run
on the Nova during durability testing are listed in Table 14.  These test
results are shown graphically as a function of distance accumulated in
Figures 15 and 16.  As can be seen from the table and figures, all emissions
were at or within  the project goals at the zero and 8050 km test points.
However, starting with the 16100 km test series, at least two, and on occa-
sion all, of the FTP gaseous emissions were above project goals.


                                     47

-------
       TABLE 12.  MAINTENANCE SCHEDULE FOR 1975 NOVA
 COMPLETE VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SCHEDULE
When To Perform Services
(Months or Miles, Whichever Occurs Rrst)
Every 6 Months or 7,500 Miles


At 1st Oil Chg. - Then Every 2nd
See Explanation

Every 12 Months
Every 12 Months or 15,000 Miles

Every 30,000 Miles



Every 6 Months or 7,500 Miles






Every 12 Months or 15,000 Miles



At First 6 Months or 7,500
Miles Then at 18 Month/
22,500 Mile Intervals


Every 12 Months or 15,000 Miles



Every 18 Months or 22,500 Miles

Every 22,500 Miles

Every 24 Months or 30,000 Miles

Every 30,000 Miles

Item
No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30

31
32
33
34
35
36
3/

Services
(For Details, See Numbered Paragraphs)
*Chassis Lubrication
•*Fluid Levels Check
*Engine Oil Change
*0il Filter Change
Tire Rotation (Steel Belted Radial)
Rear Axle Lube Change
Air Conditioning Check
"Cooling System Check
— Coolant Change & Hose Replacement
Wheel Bearing Repack
*Auto. Trans. Fluid & Filter Change
Manual Steering Gear Check
Clutch Cross Shaft Lubrication
Owner Safety Checks
Tire and Wheel Inspection
•Exhaust System Check
•Drive Belt Check
* — Belt Replacement
Suspension and Steering Check
Brake and Power Steering Check
Drum Brake and Parking Brake Check
Throttle Linkage Check
Underbody Flush & Check
Bumper Check
Thermo. Controlled Air Cleaner Check
Carburetor Choke Check
Engine Idle Speed Adjustment
EFE Valve Check
Carburetor Mounting Torque
Fuel Filter Replacement
Vacuum Advance System & Hoses Check
PCV System Check
— PCV Valve & Filter Replacement
Idle Stop Solenoid Check
Spark Plug Wires Check
Spark Plug Replacement
Engine Timing Adjustment & Dist. Check
ECS System Check & Filter Replacement
Fuel Cap, Tank and Lines Check
Air Cleaner Element Replacement

• Also A Safety Service
* Also An Emission Control Service
                        48

-------
            D  Emission tests


            O  Scheduled maintenance  (See  Table 12)


            /\  Unscheduled maintenance.  (Adjusted idle CO)
      30
O
•-H
•H
14-1
O
•a
td
to
D
O
0)
-P
(0
§
D
O
0)
O
c
to
      25
      20
      15
      10
              March
June
      Figure 14.  Distance accumulation  record of 1975 Chevrolet Nova.
                                      49

-------
                                 TABLE  14.   DURABILITY TEST RESULTS FROM  1975 NOVA
                                             WITH AIR MODULATION SYSTEM
         Distance
         Accumulation
Gaseous Emissions g/km (g/mile)
Ul
o
km (mile*)

300(480)
8050(5000)
16,100(10,000)
16,100(10,000)a
24,150(15,000)
24, 150(15, 000)b

300(480)
8050(5000)
16,100(10,000)
16,100(10,000)3
24,150(15,000)
24,150(15, 000)b

300(480)
8050(5000)
16,100(10,000)
16,100(10,000)
24,150(15,000)
24,150(15,000)
HC

0.20(0.32)
0.26(0.41)
0.36(0.58)
0.30(0.48)
0.35(0.56)
0.30(0.48)

0.07(0.11)
0.08(0.14)
0.11(0.18)
0.12(0.20)
0.13(0.21)
0.12(0.19)

0.05(0.08)
0.06(0.10)
0.08(0.13)
0.10(0.17)
0.10(0.15)
0.10(0.16)
After adjusting idle CO level
CO
FTP Tests
1.47(2.36)
2.09(3.36)
4.75(7.64)
0.74(1.18)
2.56(4.12)
2.52(4.06)
CFDS Tests
1.78(2.88)
0.44(0.70)
1.15(1.86)
0.05(0.08)
0.27(0.43)
1.16(1.87)
HFET Tests
0.62(1.00)
0.38(0.60)
0.11(0.18)
0.04(0.06)
1.13(0.21)
0.43(0.69)
to 0. 30 percent.
NOX

0.46(0.73)
0.48(0.78)
0.60(0.97)
0.63(1.01)
0.65(1.04)
0.50(0.80)

0.48(0.76)
0.58(0.94)
0.67(1.08)
0.73(1.17)
0.71(1.14)
0.50(0.81)

0.50(0.80)
0.70(1.12)
0.67(1.07)
0.65(1.04)
0.74(1.19)
0.50(0.80)

     H2S04
     mg/km
    (rag/mile)
                                             2
                                             0
                                             0
                                            10
  46(3.97)
  40(0.65)
  47(0.76)
  47(16.85)
0.62(1.00)
0.75(1.21)
     Fuel
VlOO km  (mpg)
                                                                                                     19.58(12.02)
                                                                                                     18.04(13.04)
                                                                                                     17.83(13.20)
                                                                                                     17.22(13.66)
                                                                                                     17.24(13.65)
                                                                                                     17.03(13.82)
 14.92(15.78)
 13.58(17.35)
 12.89(18.24)
 13.27(17.73)
 12.97(18.13)
 13.64(17.25)
                                                                                                     13.74(17.13)
                                                                                                     12.38(19.00)
                                                                                                     11.36(20.70)
                                                                                                     11.42(20.61)
                                                                                                     11.77(19.99)
                                                                                                     12.00(19.60)

-------
  X
 o
 3
           Note:  Solid symbols are after maintenance tests
                                                                1981 Federal Standard
  0.5




  0.4





I 0.3
\
tn


y 0.2




  0.1




    0
                                       1981 Federal Standard
    7




    6




    5




 £  4
 O
 u
                _L
                                       1981 Federal Standard
_L
_L
_L
_L
               10        20       30        40       50        60


                    Distance Accumulated, thousands of kilometers
                                               70
                                               80
            Figure 15.   Emissions as a function of distance accumulated

                         for a 1975 Nova with air modulation
                                         51

-------
 8

 7

 6

 5

 4

 3
22


21

20


19


18

17


16

15


14


13


12


11


10
Note:  Solid symbols are after maintenance
                                i
                                         I
            10       20        30       40       50        60
                    Distance Accumulated, thousands of Kilometers

        Figure 16.  Fuel consumption and sulfates as a function of
           distance for a 1975 Nova with air modulation system
                                                               70
80
                                     52

-------
     After the first 16100 km test, the high CO level seemed to indicate a
carburetor problem.  Following the test series, the engine out emissions
were meausred at several speeds, including idle.  The measured idle CO level
of 1.53 percent was considerably higher than the 0.30 percent idle CO set at
the start of durability testing.  The reason for this change could not be
ascertained.  The idle mixture screws were adjusted to give an engine out CO
of 0.30 percent at idle in drive.

     A test sequence with the correct idle CO was run on April 26, 1978.
From the results, shown in Table 14 as "after maintenance", it can be seen
that the FTP CO and HC levels were considerably lower than the first test
series.  The CO and NOx FTP emissions met the project goals.  However, the
HC emissions from the FTP were slightly higher than the 0.25 g/km project
goal.  The sulfate emissions on the CFDS tests increased from 0.47 mg/km on
April 25, 1978,to 10.47 mg/km on April 26, 1978.  This magnitude of increase
could have been caused by the air modulation valve sticking at times,
allowing more than the scheduled air injection to the catalyst.  The centri-
fugal clutch was also observed engaging sporadically during idle modes.
This too may have contributed to the higher than usual sulfate emissions by
providing some air injection at idle.  The additional air injection could
have also helped to lower the CO emission levels.  Maintenance on the cen-
trifugal clutch and air modulation valve was not scheduled until 24100 km.

     At the first 24100 km test series, all FTP gaseous emissions were
above  the project goals.  Since 24100 km (15000 miles) was a major sche-
duled maintenance point, the scheduled maintenance was performed prior to
the second test series.  There was a small decrease in all three emissions
after maintenance, but HC and CO still remained above the project goals.

     Unregulated Emissions

     From the outset of the project, it was planned to measure methane
(CH4), ammonia (NH3) and cyanide (HCN) as soon as all the analytical pro-
cedures were developed under another EPA project.^  '  For the Nova, these
emissions were measured at the 16100 and 24150 km test points.  Tables 15
and 16 present the results of these measurements.  The results are pre-
sented without comment since there are no emission standards to which the
levels can be compared,and the toxicity of the various compounds was not
researched for this project.  However, a brief discussion of the relative
importance of a number of unregulated emissions is contained in Reference 27.
                                     53

-------
           TABLE 15.  UNREGULATED EMISSIONS FROM 1975 NOVA
             WITH  AIR MODULATION SYSTEM - 16100 km TEST
 Date

4/25/78
4/26/78
 Test
 Type

FTP
FTP(C)
                    Total(a>
         Ammonia    cyanide  Methane
          mg/km      mg/km    g/km
           3.65
           0.03
(b)    0.15(b)    0.14
(b>    0.06
-------
                III-4.  THREEWAY CATALYST SYSTEM-OPTIMIZATION
                           AND DURABILITY TESTING
     Threeway catalyst systems have been shown to have low exhaust sulfate
emissions .'-*' ^°'  Therefore, it was decided at the beginning of the project
that a threeway catalyst system should be one of the emission control systems
optimized and tested for durability.  For effective operation, threeway
catalysts require a restricted A/F ratio range.  Therefore, a feedback fuel
control system is required with the threeway catalyst.

     Chrysler Corporation agreed to loan EPA a 1977 Fury with a 5.9 litre
(360 CID) engine with an experimental Holley feedback carburetor.  It was
also equipped with an air pump and EGR valve, both disconnected from their
respective systems, but installed for possible use during optimization.  The
car is described in Table 2, Section II.  The Holley feedback carburetor is
also described in detail in Section II.  As received from Chrysler, the car
had dummy catalysts installed on each cylinder bank exhaust pipe.  Two
threeway catalysts, with 5:1 platinum to rhodium ratio and a volume of
1475cc  (90 in ) each, were supplied by Engelhard Industries.

A.   Threeway Catalyst System Optimization

     A complete test series, consisting of an FTP, CFDS and HFET cycle was
performed on the car in the as-received condition.  While the car was equipped
with an air pump and EGR valve, neither was operational during this test.  The
test results from this test on March 30, 1977, are shown in Table 17-  Since
the car had no catalyst installed, the FTP gaseous emissions were quite high.
The CFDS sulfate emissions were typical of a noncatalyst car.  The fuel
consumption on both the FTP and HFET tests indicated that the A/F ratio was
richer than desired.

     After receipt of the catalysts from Engelhard Industries, a catalyst was
installed in the exhaust system of each cylinder bank, as close as possible
to the exhaust manifold.  After installing the catalysts, the main fuel
control circuit trim potentiometer and carburetor idle mixture screws were
adjusted to give engine out CO values of 0.80 percent at 80 kph (40 mph) and
during warmed up idle, as recommended by Holley.

     The usual FTP, CFDS and HFET test sequence was run on 8/17/79, with engine
out CO monitored in addition to the usual bagged emissions.  Sulfate emissions
were taken during the CFDS test.  The emissions from each test are shown in
Table 17.  The FTP gaseous HC and NOX emissions were at or below the project
goals.  The CO emission level was over twice the goal level of 2.1 g/km
(3.4 g/mile).  The CFDS sulfate emission level of 0.49 mg/km  (0.79 mg/mile)
was below the sulfate target of 3.1 mg/km (5 mg/mile).

                                     55

-------
TABLE 17.  RESULTS OF OPTIMIZATION TESTS OF THREEWAY
           CATALYST SYSTEM ON A 1977 FURY
Date

3/30/77
8/17/77
9/23/77
9/28/77
10/20/77
11/28/77
12/13/77
12/16/77
12/19/77

3/30/77
8/17/77

3/30/77
8/17/77

2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0

1
0

0
0

HC

.00(3
.26(0
.20(0
.16(0
.20(0
.16(0
.20(0
.08(0
.09(0

.04(1
.14(0

.88(1
Gaseous


.23)
.42)
.32)
.26)
.32)
.26)
.32)
.13)
.14)

.67)
.23)

.42)
.14(0.23)
Emissions


19.
4.
3.
2.
3.
2.
2.
1.
1.

10.
3.

8.
3.
CO

g/km

FTP
04(30.63)
45(7.
25(5.
36(3.
53(5.
61(4.
18(3.
39(2.
98(3.

15(16
26(5.

19(13
13(5.
16)
23)
79)
68)
20)
51)
24)
19)
CFDS
.33)
24)
HFET
.18)
04)
(g/mile)
Tests
5
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
Tests
4
0
Tests
4
0
NO

.47(8
.53(0
.31(0
.39(2
.33(0
.58(0
.45(0
.54(0
.43(0

.29(6
.12(0

.06(6
.11(0
X

.80)
.85)
.50)
.23)
.54)
.93)
.72)
.87)
.69)

.90)
.19)

.53)
.18)
H2S04
mg/km
(mg/mi.) £/100

22.
17.
17.
17.
17.
17.
17.
18.
17.

1.08(1.74)
0.49(0.79)

12.
11.
Fuel
km (mpg)

81(10.31)
00(13.83)
54(13.41)
24(13.64)
72(13.27)
24(13.64)
81(13.21)
87(12.50)
50(13.44)




93(18.19)
91(19.75)

-------
     An examination of the FTP data showed that almost all of the CO was
produced during the cold start transient phase of the FTP.

     The rest of the optimization testing on this system was performed to
reduce the CO during the cold start transient phase of the FTP, while
maintaining the HC and NOX levels within the project goals.  Thirty-eight
cold start FTP tests were run, with various adjustments and additions to the
emission control system, before all FTP gaseous emissions were within the
project goals.

     The adjustments made can be divided into 5 steps:

          1. Manual switching of the cold start circuit to
             reduce time on cold start open loop, and changing
             carburetor main jets to a leaner A/F ratio.

          2. In addition to (1), manually controlling cold start
             inlet air heater and manifold heat control valve.

          3. In addition to (1) and (2), a separate cold start,
             open loop fuel control signal generator was installed.

          4. In addition to (1),  (2), and (3), the EGR valve was
             activated.

          5. In addition to (1),  (2),  (3), and (4), the standard
             Plymouth OSAC  (orifice spark advance control) system
             was installed.

     To illustrate the effect of each step of the optimization testing,
results from seven of 38 tests performed are shown in Table 17.

     The first step in the optimization procedure was to shorten the time the
fuel control was in open loop mdoe during a cold start.  This was done by
providing a manually operated switch on the fuel control open loop circuit.
The carburetor main jets were also changed to provide a leaner A/F ratio
operating range.  Ten cold start FTP tests were run during this step with
various settings of the electronic control unit closed and open loop trim
pots.  The CO emission level had been reduced considerably but was still
above the project goal.  Any attempt to reduce the CO further by leaning the
A/F ratio  raised the NOX emissions above the goal level, as seen from the
results of the 9/28/77 test, listed in Table 17.

     Testing during this time was plagued by intermittent malfunctions of
the electronic control unit (ECU) in the fuel system.  After the problem was
identified, another ECU was obtained from Holley Carburetor and the next step
in the optimization testing begun.

     Examination of engine out CO traces had shown that the majority of the
CO was produced during the first  210 seconds of the cold start.  Since
there  was considerably less CO produced during the same time period of the
FTP hot start, CO production during the cold start was obviously a function
of engine warmup.  There were four systems installed on the car that were

                                      57

-------
used during engine warmup.   The systems were:  (1)  the feedback carburetor
cold start system, (2)  carburetor choke,  (3)  manifold heat control system,
and (4)  the inlet air heating system.

     The first two of these system were checked and/or modified during
the first step in the optimization testing.  During the second step of
optimization, operation of the last two systems was investigated.  Both
systems were modified to allow manual operation, and the flow area for the
inlet air heating system was increased.  Nine tests were run while investi-
gating the effects of these two systems.   The best overall emissions were
obtained from the test on 10/20/77.  The  results of the test, listed in Table
17, showed almost no change from the best Step 1 results.

     The fuel control for the feedback carburetor has two modes of operation,
as explained earlier.  The open loop or cold start mode was understood to
be independent of the closed loop mode, so that A/F ratio in one mode could
be adjusted without affecting A/F ratio in the other mode.  However, during
ECU adjustments prior to each of the tests in Steps 1 and 2, it appeared
that the open loop and closed loop circuits were not independent of each
other.

     To test these observations, a test at idle conditions was run on both
open loop and closed loop modes.  During this test, the control vacuum to
carburetor was recorded on a strip chart recorder using a vacuum transducer
in the control line.  The oxygen sensor millivolt output (an indication of
A/F ratio) was also recorded on a strip chart.  The control was run in the
closed loop mode, then switched to open loop mode.  The open loop A/F ratio
only was adjusted.  However, when the control was switched back to closed loop
mode, a corresponding change in the closed loop A/F ratio was observed.
After running these tests, it became obvious that a completely independent
open loop circuit was required.

     A pulse generator circuit was designed and built using a Signetics 555
timer.  Tests with the circuit installed constituted the third step in the
optimization procedure.  While the independent open loop circuit resulted
in significantly lower CO emissions, the CO level was still not within the
project goal.  The best overall emissions obtained from five tests comprising
Step 3 were from the 11/28/77 test, as shown in Table 17.  Examination of the
emission results and A/F ratios indicated that this was the lowest CO level
that could be obtained without exceeding the NOX goal.

     It was decided that the EGR system which was installed, but not used,
should be activated to allow a leaner A/F ratio for lower CO emission, while
maintaining NOX levels. The activation of the EGR was Step 4 of optimization.
While this improved the CO emissions, after seven cold start FTP tests with
various ECU settings, it was concluded that it was still not possible to sim-
ultaneously meet the CO and NOX goals. The best overall emission results with
the EGR system were on 12/13/77 as listed in Table 17-

     At this point, it appeared that it would not be possible to meet the
project emission goals with this car.  However, there was a stock Plymouth
emission control device that had not been used.  This device was the standard

                                      58

-------
Plymouth orifice spark advance control  (OSAC) which was used to provide a
delay in the distributor vacuum advance signal.  The fifth and last step
in the optimization process was to test the car with the addition of the
OSAC system.  Emissions from the initial test with this system met the
project goals; however, there was approximately a five percent increase in
fuel consumption as demonstrated by the 12/16/77 test results shown in Table
17.

     In order to recover some of the fuel economy lost with the OSAC system,
a thermally actuated valve was installed in the vacuum lines to bypass the
OSAC valve after the engine warmed up  (about 2 to 3 minutes).  A test with
this system was run on 12/19/77.  As can be seen from Table 17 there was a
definite fuel economy improvement using the OSAC valve only during the cold
start, at the expense of a small increase in CO.  Since all gaseous FTP
emissions were within the project goals and further reduction did not appear
possible within the project scope of work, this testing terminated the
optimization of the threeway catalyst  system.  The final emission control
system included:

      •  Feedback controlled carburetor

        Independent open loop fuel control signal for cold starts

      •  Threeway catalysts

      •  Shortened cold start operation for choke, inlet air heater and
        manifold heat

      •  An EGR system

      .  An Orifice Spark Advance Control valve

B.   Threeway Catalyst System Durability Testing

     At the completion of the optimization testing, the Fury had accumulated
9607 km (5971 miles).  However, the threeway catalyst system had been operated
for less than 3200 km,  with most of the system having less than 1200 km of
use.  It was decided to use the threeway catalyst installation at 8530 km
(5300 miles) as the "zero distance" point for durability testing.

     To bring the engine systems as close as possible to a zero distance
condition, the oil was changed and the spark plugs, air filter and oil
filter replaced.  This was the only maintenance done prior to starting
durability testing.  For purposes of maintenance schedules, these items
were counted as through they were performed at the zero distance point.

     Plymouth Distance Accumulation Chronology

     -Initial durability emissions testing was performed on 12/29/77.  The
emissions test series is shown in Table 4,  Section III-2.  This test series
was counted as a 965 km (600 mile) test.  The car was driven for 320 km  (200
miles) on the AMA distance accumulation schedule between the two replicate

                                      59

-------
tests.  Distance accumulation started on January 4, 1978.  The car was
driven on the distance accumulation course shown in Figure 4, Section II,
for two eight hour shifts per day, five days per week.  Approximately
640 km (400 miles)were accumulated each day.  Duplicate emission tests were
performed every 8050 km, with 805 km (500 miles) of the durability driving
schedule between the two duplicate tests, to provide equivalent catalyst
sulfate conditioning for each test.  Scheduled maintenance was performed every
12,070 (7500 miles)  as specified in the 1977 Plymouth Service Manual.  A
summary of the required maintenance is shown in Table 18.  Some unscheduled
maintenance was required.  Figure 17 shows what unscheduled maintenance was
performed and indicates the accumulated distance at which it occurred.  A
graphical representation of the distance accumulation records is presented in
Figure 17.  The figure shows daily distance, maintenance and emissions test
points.  Starting with the 8050 km (5000 mile) test point, at least one of
FTP gaseous emissions exceeded the project limit at each test point.  Consid-
erable time was spent at each emission test series investigating the reasons
for the high emission levels and replacing some of the emission control
system parts.  The details of these investigations are covered in the dis-
cussion of the emission test results in the next subsection.

      The car accumulated 32200 km  (20000 miles) on June 1, 1978.  At
that  time the durability testing was stopped because the CO and NOX emissions
were  above the project goals, with no possibility of reduction in emission
levels as distance accumulation continued.

      Fury Fuel and Oil Consumption

      The average fuel and oil consumption for each interval between emission
tests is shown in Table 19.  The fuel consumption is quite consistent
between emission tests  at the level expected.  Since there were only 4
quarts (3.8 litres)  of oil added during the 32633 km (20281 miles) of distance
accumulation, the oil consumption in each interval appears somewhat erratic,
depending on when the oil was added.  However, the overall oil consumption
of 1.15 £/1000 km (0.25 qt/1000 miles)  is ocnsidered better than average.
                 TABLE 19.  FUEL AND OIL CONSUMPTION DURING
                      DURABILITY TESTING FOR 1977 FURY

       Distance
       Interval                  Fuel               Oil Consumption
       km (mile)            ft/IPO km (mpg)      1,/LOOO km  (qt/1000 mi.)

       0-8050                16,59 (14.18)          0.214  (0.364)
       (0-10,000)

       8050-16,100           16.60 (14.17)          0.068  (0.116)
       (5000-10,000)

       16,100-24,150         17.45 (13.48)          0.305  (0.519)
       (10,000-15,000)

       24,150-32,200           no data              0.113  (0.192)
       (15,000-20,000)

       Overall               16.86 (13.95)          0.145  (0.247)
                                      60

-------
             35
en
        Q)
        e
        0
        l-l
        •H
        c/j
        •a

        (0
       03
        0)
       4J
        flj
        O
        U
        (1)
        U
        C
       •H
       Q
             30
             25
             20
15
            10
                        D  Emis
                   ;ion tests
           O Scheduled  maintenance (See Table


              Unscheduled  maintenance
                    Investigation


                    Replaced  02  s

                    vacuum amplif

                    EGR
                                                             L8)
of high  NOX


nsor, catalyst

er.  Increased
and

D
                   January
                     February
    March
  April
                                   May
                                                                                               June
                                                          1978
                             Figure  17.   Distance accumulation record of 1977 Plymouth  Fury

-------
                        TABLE  18.   MAINTENANCE SCHEDULE  FOR 1977 FURY
                        LUBRICATION  AND  MAINTENANCE  SCHEDULES
RFQIMRFP MAINTFNANP.F RFRVIHFS FOR EMISSION CONTROL AND PROPER VEHICLE PERFORMANCE

AUTOMATIC CHOKE
CARBURETOR CHOKE SHAFT
CARBURETOR AIR FILTER
COOLING SYSTEM
CRANKCASE INLET AIR CLEANER
ENGINE OIL
ENGINE OIL FILTER
FAST IDLE CAM AND PIVOT PIN
FUEL FILTER
IDLE SPEED AND AIR-FUEL MIXTURE
IGNITION CABLES
MANIFOLD HEAT CONTROL VALVE
POSITIVE CRANKCASE VENT VALVE
POSITIVE CRANKCASE VENT VALVE
SPARK PLUGS (WITHOUT CAT. CONV.)
SPf RK PLUGS (WITH CAT. CONV.)
TAPPET ADJUSTMENT 6 CYL. ENG.
USDERHOOD RUBBER AND PLASTIC
COMPONENTS (EMISSION HOSES)
VAPOR STORAGE CANISTER FILTER ELEMENT
MILEAGE INTERVALS MILEAGE IN THOUSANDS
CHECK AND ADJUST AS REQUIRED AT
APPLY SOLVENT EVERY SIX MONTHS OR
REPLACE AT
CHECK AND SERVICE AS REQUIRED EVERY 12 MONTHS OR
CLEAN AT
CHANGE EVERY SIX MONTHS OR
7.5






15



•


REPLACE AT INITIAL OIL CHANGE AND EVERY 2ND OIL CHANGE THEREAFTER
APPLY SOLVENT EVERY SIX MONTHS OR
REPLACE AT
CHECK AND ADJUST AS REQUIRED AT





•
22.5










CHECK AND REPLACE AS REQUIRED AT TIME OF SPARK PLUG REPLACEMENT
APPLY SOLVENT AT
CHECK OPERATION AND REPLACE IF NECESSARY
REPLACE AT
REPLACE AT
REPLACE AT
CHECK AND ADJUST AS REQUIRED AT
INSPECT AND REPLACE IF NECESSARY AT
REPLACE AT









•

•

•
•









30
•

•
•
•



•
•

•

•
•
•
•
c
•
37.5



















4.5



•





•


•

•
•
•

Inspection and Service should also be performed anytime a malfunction is observed or suspected. Retain receipts for all vehicle emission services to
prelect your emission warranty.
RECOMMENDED MAINTENANCE  SERVICES
POWER STEERING
EXHAUST SYSTEM
BRAKE MASTER CYLINDER
TRANSMISSION
BRAKE & POWER STEERING HOSES
AIR CONDITIONED CARS
BALL JOINTS, STEERING LINKAGE,
AND UNIVERSAL JOINTS
HOOD LOCK, REL. MECH. & SAFETY CATCH
DRIVE BELTS
UPPER AND LOWER CONTROL
ARM BUSHINGS
TIRES
COOLING SYSTEM
BRAKE LININGS
FRONT WHEEL BEARINGS*(1)
AUTOrVATIC TRANSMISSION— SEVERE
USAGE ONLY
BALL JOJNTS & TIE ROD ENDS
CHECK FLUID LEVEL
CHECK FOR LEAKS, MISSING OR
DAMAGED PARTS
INSPECT FLUID LEVEL
INSPECT FLUID LEVEL
CHECK FOR DETERIORATION OR LEAKS
CHECK BELTS, SIGHT GLASS &
OPERATION OF CONTROLS
INSPECT SEALS
LUBRICATE
CHECK CONDITION & TENSION
INSPECT
ROTATE
DRAIN, FLUSH & REFILL
INSPECT
INSPECT
CHANGE FLUID & FILTER, ADJUST BANDS
LUBRICATE
EVERY OIL CHANGE
EVERY 6 MONTHS
EVERY 6 MONTHS
EVERY 6 MONTHS
EVERY 6 MONTHS
EVERY 6 MONTHS
EVERY 6 MONTHS
EVERY 6 MONTHS
EVERY OIL CHANGE
EVERY OIL CHANGE
EVERY 10,000 MILES
AT 24 MONTHS OR 30,000 MILES AND
EVERY 12 MONTHS OR
15,000 MILES THEREAFTER
EVERY 15,000 MILES
EVERY 22,500 MILES
EVERY 24,000 MILES
EVERY 3 YEARS OR 30,000 MILES
 'O1E. Lc::l driving conditions, or special equipment such as high performance or heavy duty options may require special service recommenoal
  lfi:.;tir; '.he iron* v.heel bearings whenever the bra'te drums cr rotors are removed to inspect or service the brake system.
 '!) $•- ,cre usage such as police or taxi senice involving frequent or continuous brake application: Lubricate every 9,000 miles.
ions.
                                                        62

-------
     Fury Emission Test Results

     The average test results from the five duplicate test series run on
the Fury during durability testing are listed in Table 20.  The emissions
are shown graphically as a function of distance accumulated in Figures 18
and 19.  As can be seen from the table and figures, all emissions were
within the project goals at 965 km (600 miles).

     At 8050 km  (500 miles) NOX was above the project goal.  Some time
was spent investigating the cause of the high NOX emissions.  While no
reason could be found for the high NOX, another test series was run with
NOX levels at the project goals.  Both test series are shown in Table 20.

     The first 16100 km (10000 miles) test produced CO and NOX levels
above the project goals.  Additional testing was performed to ascertain the
cause of these high emissions.  Catalyst conversion efficiency for both
CO and NOX was checked.  The left cylinder bank catalyst was removed from
the car and radiographed to check for possible catalyst damage.  No damage
was found.  After considerable investigation, the following adjustments and
parts replacements were made:

     • replaced oxygen sensor

     • replaced catalyst with two Volvo catalyst
        (5:1 pt/pd ratio)

     • increased EGR

     • richened idle A/F ratio approximately two tenths of a ratio

     • adjusted vacuum amplifier to hold EGR valve closed at idle

     A cold start FTP was run on the test car on April 6, 1978, with the
emissions once again within project limits.  Two complete test series were
then run.  These tests are listed in Table 20 as "16100 km, after maintenance"
tests.

     Since 24150 km (15000 miles) was a major scheduled maintenance point, a
single test series was run before and after maintenance.  The before main-
tenance FTP emissions were all above the project goal levels.  Both CO and HC
emissions were approximately three times the previous (16100 km)  tests.  The
after maintenance HC level was again within the project goals, but CO and NOX
emissions were still not within their respective goals.  Nevertheless, dis-
tance accumulation was continued until 32200 km (20,000 miles).

     The HC and CO emissions changed only slightly between 24150 and the
32200 km test.  HC was still within the project goals and NOX still was
higher than the goals.  The CO emissions almost doubled between the after
maintenance 21150 km test and the 3200 km FTP test.  It was obvious by then
that CO emissions were going to increase at a rapid rate and could not be held
even close to the project goal level.  Therefore, the durability test was
halted.

                                     63

-------
                   TABLE  20.   DURABILITY  TEST  RESULTS  FROM 1977  PLYMOUTH  FURY
                          WITH FEEDBACK CARBURETOR AND THREEWAY  CATALYST
Distance
Accumulation
Gaseous Emissions g/km (g/mile)
km (miles)

965(600)
8050(5000)
16,100(10,000)
16, 100(10, 000)a
24,150(15,000)
24,150(15,000)
32,200(20,000)

965(600)
8050(5000)
16,1000(10,000)
16,100(10,000)
24,150(15,000)^
h
24,150(15,000)
32,200(20,000)

965(600)
8050(5000)
16,100(10,000)
16, 100(10, 000)a
24,150(15,000)
24,150(15,000)
HC

0.22(0.36)
0.16(0.25)
0.22(0.35)
0.19(0.31)
0.59(0.95)
0.18(0.28)
0.23(0.36)

0.03(0.05)
0.02(0.04)
0.03(0.05)
0.02(0.04)
0.02(0.04)
0.03(0.05)
0.04(0.06)

0.02(0.04)
0.02(0.03)
0.02(0.03)
0.02(0.04)
0.03(0.05)
0.02(0.04)
CO
FTP Tests
1.80(2.90)
1.77(2.85)
2.66(4.28)
2.02(3.24)
6.66(10.71)
2.87(4.62)
4.79(7.70)
CFDS Tests
0.32(0.51)
0.67(1.08)
1.35(2.17)
0.58(0.94)
0.65(1.04)
1.23(1.98)
1.88(3.03)
HFET Tests
0.17(0.28)
0.36(0.58)
0.90(1.45)
0.40(0.63)
0.81(1.31)
0.87(1.40)
NOX

0.59(0.95)
0.83(1.33)
0.91(1.46)
0.64(1.02)
0.85(1.37)
1.08(1.74)
1.11(1.79)

0.73(1.18)
0.78(1.26)
1.10(1.77)
0.60(0.98)
1.01(1.63)
0.90(1.44)
1.03(1.63)

0.82(1.32)
0.84(1.36)
1.12(1.80)
0.53(0.84)
0.96(1.55)
0.78(1.25)
                      H2SO4
                      mg/km
                     (mg/mile)
                                                                           0.
                                                                           0.
                                                                           0.
                                                                           0.
                                                                           0.
                                                                           0.
                                                  66(1.
                                                  43(0,
                                                  37(0.
                                                  34(0.
                                                  40(0.
                                                  42(0.
                            07)
                            69)
                            60)
                            54)
                            64)
                            68)
                                                                           0.76(1.23)
     Fuel
yiOO km  (mpg)
                                                                                            17.84(13.21)
                                                                                            18.51(12.72)
                                                                                            18.52(12.70)
                                                                                            18.18(12.95)
                                                                                            18.65(12.62)
                                                                                            18.39(12.79)
                                                                                            20.56(11.56)
32,200(20,000)   0.02(0.04)
           1.28(2.06)
0.84(1.37)
 12.14(19.38)
 11.79(19.96)
 12.49(18.83)
 11.70(20.10)
 11.80(19.94)
 11.63(20.22)
 10.94(21.53)
  After maintenance tests

-------
                  NOTE:   Solid symbols are after maintenance tests
6
M

Cn
o
2
                                                          1981 Federal Standard
   0.5



   0.4




£  0.3
^

tn

 -  0.2
U
sc

   0.1




     0
                                                     1981 Federal Standard
g
^

Cn
O
U
7




6



5




4




3
                                                     1981 Federal Standard
                10       20        30       40        50        60

                      Distance Accumulated, Thousands of Kilometers
                                                                    70
            Figure 18. Emissions as a function of distance accumulated for

               a 1977 Fury with 3-way catalyst and feedback carburetor
80
                                          65

-------
CO

Q

CK

U





O
-U

TO
 D
 co
    8 r-
    7  -
                    NOTE:   Solid  symbols are after maintenance tests
 o
 o
 c
 o
 •H
 -p


 I
 w
 c
 o
 U
    21 ,-
    20 -
    19
    18
    17
16
15
    14
          O  HFET


          Q  Combined


          &  FTP
    13






    12





    11





    10
                                    J_
                                               I
                                                                  I
                 10        20        30        40        50        60


                         Distane  accumulated,  thousands of kilometers
                                                                       70
80
         Figure  19.  Fuel  consumption and sulfates as a function of distance


                        for a  1977  Fury with feedback carburetor




                                           66

-------
     Examining Figures 18 and 19, it can be seen that the HC levels were
above the project goal at only one point, the 24,150 km before maintenance
test; after maintenance it returned to the levels of the three previous
emission tests.  While the NOX emissions had been above the project goals
from 8050 kilometers onward, the increase was fairly gradual and appeared
to be leveling off.  Thus, it is possible that this system installed on a
different car, with somewhat lower initial emissions, might meet the 1981
HC and NOX standards, but it is doubtful that this vehicle could ever meet
the 1981 CO standards after 80,500 km  (50,000 miles) of durability distance
accumulation.

     Unregulated Emissions

     Emissions of ammonia,  total  cyanide and methane were measured during
 the  24100 and 23300 km  test series.   These emissions are presented in
 Tables  21 and 22.  As was stated  in  the presentation of unregulated emissions
 for  the Nova  in  Section III-3B,  there  is little  that can be said about the
 absolute levels  of these emissions, since there are  no  standards against
 which they  could be compared.   However, a comparison of levels between the two
 cars tested may  be of value.  FTP methane levels as a  percent of the total
 hydrocarbons  are approximately  the same for the  two cars, at about 40 percent
 of the  total  hydrocarbons.  Cyanide levels of all tests form the Fury are the
 same order  of magnitude as  those  from the Nova.  As would be expected from a
 threeway; catalyst system,  ammonia emissions from the  Fury are 5 to 10 times
 ammonia emissions from  the  Nova.   The  HFET tests on the Fury appear to pro-
 duce the highest ammonia levels.   Simply because ammonia emissions from the
 Fury are an order of magnitude  greater than those from the Nova, does not
 imply that  ammonia emissions from the Fury should be of concern.  That can only
 be determined by consideration  of what levels might be hazardous.  Such con-
 sideration  was not part of  this project.  However,  Reference 27 contains a
 discussion  of a  method  for  grossly estimating the importance of a number of
 unregulated emissions for those interested in persuing the subject further.
                                      67

-------
       TABLE 21.   UNREGULATED EMISSIONS FROM 1977 PLYMOUTH FURY
      WITH FEEDBACK CARBURETOR AND THREEWAY CATALYST - 24100  km

Date
5/3/78
5/8/78
5/3/78
5/8/78
5/3/78
5/8/78

Test
Type
FTP.
FTP(C)
CFDS. .
CFDS(C)
HFET
HFET }

Ammonia
mg/km
4!3l(b)
27.93
51.24
33.90
70.53
Total
Cyanide
mg/km
S:S$
0.03
0.06
0.14
0.11
Non-Methane
Methane
g/km
0.10
0.07
0.01
0.01
0.02
0.01
HC
g/km
0.49
0.11
0.01
0.02
0.01
0.01
  Total cyanide is cyanide (HCN) plus cyanogen  (C2N2)

  Single unweighted sample for all of FTP test
Q
  Test on 5/3/78 after maintenance
       TABLE 22.  UNREGULATED EMISSIONS FROM 1977 PLYMOUTH FURY
      WITH FEEDBACK CARBURETOR AND THREEWAY CATALYST - 32200  km
Date
5/29/78
6/1/78
Average
5/29/78
6/1/78
Average
5/29/78
6/1/78
Average
Test
Type
FTP
FTP
CFDS
CFDS
HFET
HFET
Ammonia
mg/km
25'22!b!
48.67
36.95
49.79
64.39
57.09
68.34
103.98
86.16
Total Non-Methane
Cyanide* Methane HC
mg/km g/km g/km
0^37 (b)
0.24
0.03
0.01
0.02
0.22
0.26
0.24
0.10
0.08
0.09
0.02
0.01
0.02
0.02
0.01
0.02
0.12
0.16
0.14
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.01
<0.01
0.01
  Total cyanide is cyanide  (HCN) plus cyanogen  (C N  )
•t                                                 22
  Single unweighted sample for all of FTP test
                                    68

-------
            IV.  PHASE II - OPTIMIZATION AND DURABILITY TESTING
                OF THREEWAY PLUS OXIDATION CATALYST SYSTEM
     The two low sulfate emission control systems originally chosen and
tested for durability, were not able to maintain gaseous emissions within
the 1981 standards as distance accumulation progressed.  In a continuation
of the effort to meet the project goals, a different emission control system
and test car were selected to undergo optimization and durability testing.
The emission control system was a threeway catalyst, plus an air injected
oxidation catalyst.  The system was installed on a 1978 California Volvo
sedan with a four cylinder engine.  This part of the project is designated
as Phase II.
                                     69

-------
         IV. 1.   TEST VEHICLE,  EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM AND TEST PLAN


     Following the decision to terminate testing of the two low sulfate emis-
sion cars, a meeting was held  at Ann Arbor,  Michigan, between EPA and  SwRI
representatives to discuss the direction the project should take.  Both
emissions control systems that were undergoing tests,  the threeway catalyst
with feedback carburetor, and  the air modulation system  demonstrated the
ability to keep sulfate emissions low.  Their problem was a rapid deteriora-
tion of gaseous emissions.  It was felt that a different fuel system,  such as
a feedback fuel injection system, might provide less rapid deterioration.

     From information provided to EPA by the automotive manufacturers, it
appeared that fuel injection and threeway plus oxidation catalysts would be
two of the approaches to meeting the 1981 Federal standards.(3D  Therefore,
it was decided to change the demonstration vehicle and emission control system
to ones more closely resembling what was planned by manufacturers for 1981.
The new vehicle would be obtained, the emission control system installed and
optimized, and as much durability testing completed as the funds remaining
permitted.

A.   Vehicle Selection and Description

     Three considerations dominated the choice of test vehicle.  The first
was the stock emission control system.  A threeway catalyst with feedback
fuel control,  preferably fuel injected, was desired.   The second considera-
tion was vehicle size.  A vehicle that would be considered medium size in
1981, capable of carrying at least five passengers, was desired.  It was
judged that this size car would probably have a curb weight of approximately
1360 kg (3000 Ibs).  The third consideration was fuel economy.  The fuel
economy standards for 1981 require a CAFE value of 22 miles per gallon.  A
manufacturer with a complete vehicle mix of large, medium and small cars
would require a medium size, five passenger car, having a fuel economy ap-
proximately equal to the CAFE  standard.  Therefore, the car chosen should
have a combined fuel economy of approximately 10.7 i/IOO km (22 mpg).

     After consideration of several vehicles, a four-cylinder, 1978 Volvo, with
the Lambda-Sond emission control system was chosen as the best readily available
car meeting the selection considerations.  A description of the car is pre-
sented in Table 23.  Photographs of the car and engine compartment are shown
in Figure 20.

B.   Emission Control System

     The stock emission control system on the California version of the Volvo
244 is a threeway catalytst, feedback fuel injection system, named the "Lambda-
Sond" system by Volvo.  The stock Lambda-Sond emission control system is shown


                                      70

-------
           TABLE 23.  DESCRIPTION OF PHASE II TEST CAR
Manufacturer                                       Volvo

Model                                              244DL
Model year                                          1978
Vehicle Identification No.  (VIN)               24445L1-309507
Emission family designation                       4CL/E1
Engine displacement, litres  (cu.in.)              2.1(130)
No. of cylinders and configurations                  14
Transmission                                    3 speed auto.

Ignition timing                              12° ETC @ 750 rpm

Idle rpm                                          900 rpm
Fuel system                              Volvo "CI" fuel injection
Rear axle ratio                                      3.91

Tires                                            175 SR 14

Stock Emission Control System             California Lambda-Sond
                                 (threeway catalyst w/feedback fuel injection)

Inertia weight class  (Ibs)                          3500
                                 71

-------
Figure 20.  1978 Volvo 244 test car
                   72

-------
in Figure 21.  This system is used with the mechanical fuel injection system,
shown in Figure 22.

     One way to reduce CO emissions from this system is to install an oxida-
tion catalyst downstream of the threeway catalyst and provide air for oxida-
tion by means of air injection between the two catalysts.  This threeway
plus oxidation catalyst system was in use on the 1978 Ford Pinto in California
and was actively being investigated by a number of automobile manufacturers.
The drawback to this system is that the air injected oxidation catalyst can
produce large amounts of sulfate.  However, it was demonstrated in Phase I of
this project that modulated air injection can significantly reduce the sulfate
emissions from an oxidation catalyst.

     Therefore, the new system chosen to meet the project goals of a low sul-
fate system capable of meeting the 1981 gaseous emission standards was a feed-
back fuel injection system with a threeway plus modulated air injected oxida-
tion catalyst.

     An additional technique was planned for evaluation on the test car.  This
technique was to use the stock emission control system, but to add air injection
to the exhaust manifold only during the first minute or so of the cold start
to provide air for CO and HC oxidation in the manifold during the catalyst
warmup.  Since a large part of the CO emitted occurs during the first minute
of the cold start, it is possible that this technique could work.  As an example,
on the 20,000 mile test of the Fury with threeway catalyst, listed in Section
III-4, 61 percent of the CO was produced during the cold start 505 second portion
of the test.

     A cold start exhaust manifold air injection system also fitted into the
modulated air injection system already planned.  In fact, the 1978 California
Pinto included this feature in its emission control system.  While the EPA had
suggested using reed valve exhaust manifold air injection during the cold start,
it was felt that using the air pump already installed was a more expedient method
of demonstrating this concept.  Since the exhaust manifold injection system was
already part of the emission control system, to test it alone, the oxidation
catalyst is removed and the air injection  to  the  oxidation  catalyst is  dumped.
to atmosphere.  More importantly however, aspirator design is an art.  The
aspirator connecting tubes must be properly tuned to obtain maximum airflow.
Much time and effort could be expended in developing as aspirator only to find
it produced insufficient CO control.

     A sketch of the manifold air injection system is shown in Figure 23.  The
technique was tested during the optimization phase using an air pump to supply
the air.  At the conclusion of the project, this technique was again evaluated
using aspirated air injection often refered to as a "pulse air" system.  This
system is shown in Figure 24.

     The modulated air injection system was similar to the one used on the 1975
Nova in Phase 1 of this project.  The details of the air injection system used
are shown in Figure 25.  It consisted of the following components:

     • A belt driven air pump equipped with a centrifugal clutch.

                                      73

-------
   Threeway catalyst
    The ratio of oxygen
    in the exhaust gases
    determines the strength
.    of the output signal
'; ;'• , from the

V:-'  OXYGEN SENSOR
;
                                                                   exhaust  pipe
                                                     oxygen sensor
                                                     ("lambda sond")
                                       This signal is fed into
                                       the ELECTRONIC MODULE
                                       which converts the signal
                                       and supplies a control
                                       current to the...
                     electronic
                     module
                        ....FREQUENCY VALVE
                        which influences the
                        fuel flow and thereby
                        the ratio of oxygen
                        in the exhaust gases
                                                     fuel distributor
                     Figure 21.   Lambda-Sond system
                                      74

-------
Inaction Valve
                                                                                                                  frequency valve
                                                              Idle Speed
                                                              Adjusting Screw
                                                              Throttle Plate
                                                              Air Funnel
                                                              Air-Flow Sensor F'ata
Common Intake
Manifold
                                                                                                                 Primary Circuit
                                                                                                                 Pressure Regulator
                    Auxiliary-air Device
                                                                                        Mixture Control Unit
                    Thermo-time Switch
                    controls the start valve, closes this
                        a certain temperature limit.
                                                              Air-Flow Sensor
                                                                                                                    Warm-up Regulator
                    Fuel Accumulator
                                                              Electnc fn-.-l P-..T-3
                                 Figure  22.   Fuel  injection  system

-------
                                           3-way vac. solenoid
                                                check valve

                                                       air control  valve
        Figure 23.  Air pump exhaust manifold injection
                                check valves
from
air filter
                      11   i  i  i  I   i   r
        Figure 24.   Aspirated exhaust manifold injection
                                76

-------
                                                     Air modulation valve
                             3 way vac.
                             solenoid
                             AIR CONTROL
                                VALVE
              VALVE  CHECK
Threeway
Catalyst
                                      EXHAUST
                                     MANIFOLD
Centrifugal
   Clutch
Oxidation
Catalyst
                         Figure 25.  Air injection system

-------
        The standard air pump dump and relief valve controlled by
        manifold vacuum.

        An air control valve to switch the air from the exhaust
        manifold to the oxidation catalyst.  Air is directed to
        the exhaust manifold as long as there is vacuum to the
        valve.  A solenoid valve shuts off the vacuum and vents
        the control valve to atmosphere.  The solenoid is accuated
        by a time delay relay.

     •  A manifold vacuum controlled air modulation valve.

     The air pump, dump valve, air control valve, and check valves were stock
1978 Pinto parts.  The threeway vacuum solenoid was a standard automotive
type manufactured by Marvel-Schebler/Tillotson.  The oxidation catalyst was
the same model Ford catalyst used on the 1975 Nova in Phase I.  The air pump
centrifugal clutch and air modulation valve were designed and built by SwRI.
Both the centrifugal clutch and air modulation valve were redesigned for this
phase of the project.  Figure 26 is a cross section of the redesigned centri-
fugal clutch and Figure 27 is a cross section of the redesigned air modula-
tion valve.

     During optimization testing, various parts of the system were bypassed
or disconnected to evaluate their contribution to emission control.  However,
the final system used in the durability test phase included all components
shown in Figure 25.  As the optimization testing progressed, it became obvious
that additional CO control was needed during the first minute of the cold
start portion of the FTP.

     Many feedback fuel systems used with threeway catalysts have an open loop
circuit which operates during the first part of the cold start while the
oxygen sensor is warming up.  The Volvo, as far as could be determined, did
not have such an open loop circuit.  It was reasoned that an open loop circuit,
which would provide a signal to the fuel control system to run leaner than the
stock system, would reduce the cold start CO.  A simple,   manually  switched
system capable of providing from 0 to 800 mv to the electronic module was built
to evaluate this technique.  When it proved successful,  an automatic circuit
was designed and built to provide A/F ratio control during cold starts.

     The circuit to generate a voltage signal to the fuel system ECU to replace
the oxygen sensor voltage signal during cold starts is shown in Figure 28.  A
recorder trace of the voltage to the ECU during an actual cold start is shown
in Figure 29.  The fuel system supplies more fuel when the voltage is low and
less fuel when the voltage is high.  A complete schematic of all electrical
circuits added to the car is shown in Figure 30.  The major elements of circuitry
and their function are:

     • SwRI cold start circuit, whose function is explained above.

     • Thermal switch in cooling system to cut out SwRI cold start
       circuit and exhaust manifold air injection when engine is warm.
                                     78

-------
 Driving parts
Driven parts
 Bearings and clutch shoes
                               Pulley Sheave
                                   Spring
                                    Clutch shoes
Figure 26.  Redesigned centrifugal clutch
                    79

-------
from
air pump
                                                             dump to atmosphere
                              to catalyst
                  Figure 27.  Redesigned air modulation valve
                                       80

-------
                                       time delay
                                       relay (N.C.)
                                       (24 seconds)
                                                                 .+ 14 volts DC
               6800
o>
       200 yf
                                  2.5  volt
                                  (nominal)
5 volts
(nominal)
                                                                   3300 yf
                                            +  (0-800  mv)
                                                                                   180 kfi
                           Figure 28.  SwRI cold start circuit for Volvo with Lambda-Sond

-------
-Oo SENSOR-
SWRI COLD  START CIRCUIT
   (65.5 SECONDS)
                                                              800 MV  -
                    COLD START
                     6/13/79
                    CHART SPEED
                     12 CM/MIN
                              400 MV  -
      Figure- 29.  ECU input voltage fron SwRI circuit during cold start

-------
12 volt supply
            time delay    +
            relay
            (65 se
    SwRI cold start
        circuit
                                                           thermal
                                                           switch
                                                           (100°F)
                                                           (shown hot)
                                                    time delay relay  (54 seconds)
                                                                                                air injection
                                                                                                vacuum switching valve
                                                                                                    exhaust manifold
                                                                                                    air injection
                                                                                                     stop valve  (NC)
Volvo
Lambda-Sond
Electronic
Control Unit
                                                               Oxygen
                                                               Sensor
                    Figure 30.  Cold start circuitry for modified Volvo Lambda-Sond system

-------
     •  Relay controlled by thermal switch to switch ECU input
       from cold start circuit to oxygen sensor.  Also to switch
       vacuum control valve and positive shut off valve in exhaust
       manifold air injection system.

     •  Time delay relay to switch from cold start ECU input to
       oxygen sensor input.  Delay shown on schematic is final
       optimization value.

     •  Time delay relay to switch off exhaust manifold air injection.
       Delay shown on schematic is final optimization value.

C.   Test Organization for Phase II

     The testing of the Volvo and the emission control system was divided into
two parts.  The first, optimization testing, included "as-received" tests,
various baseline configuration tests,  and optimization testing of the air
modulation system.  The purpose of this part of the testing was to produce an
emission control system with sulfate emissions below 3.1 mg/km (5.0 mg/mile)
and gaseous emissions low enough to be within the 1981 emission standards
after  80500 km (50,000 miles).  The same test procedures used in Phase I of
the project were used in Phase II.

     The second part was durability testing, in which the car with emission
control system installed was driven  64400 km (40,000 miles) on the durability
driving schedule shown in Figure 4, Section II.   Emission tests were performed
every 8050 km  (5000 miles) using the same test procedures as were used in
Phase I.  The details of each part of the system testing are covered in sections
that follow.
                                     84

-------
                        IV-2.  OPTIMIZATION TESTING
     The modulated air system optimization  for low gaseous emissions and low
sulfates took place between August 1978 and March 1979.  The test plan called
for a series of baseline tests in various hardware configurations, while ac-
cumulating approximately 5950 km  (3700 miles) on the car.  This distance ac-
cumulation was necessary to properly age the catalyst.  Experience gained with
the 1975 Nova in Phase I of this project  demonstrated the need to age the
catalyst prior to optimization, so as not to be misled by extremely low CO
emissions from a green catalyst.

     Since the concept of modulating the air to an oxidation catalyst had been
demonstrated in Phase I of this project, the main emphasis of the Volvo opti-
mization testing was to reduce FTP gaseous  emissions to a level that would allow
the car to meet the 1981 gaseous emission standards after 80,500 km (50,000
miles) of durability testing.

     The project goal was to meet emission  levels of 0.25 g/km  (0.41 g/mile) HC,
2.11 gAm (3.4 g/mile) CO, and 0.62 g/km  (1.0 g/mile) NOX at 80,500 km (50,000
miles).  Realistic deterioration factors with threeway catalyst appeared to be
1.5 for HC, 2.0 for CO and 3.0 for NOX.(30)  Therefore, the gaseous emissions
goals at the end of optimization  (6500 km or 4000 miles) were set at 0.17 g/km
(0.27 g/mile) HC, 1.06 g/km  (1.7 g/mile) CO, and 0.21 g/km  (0.33 g/mile)  NOX.
The sulfate goal at 80,500 km was 3.11 g/km (5.0 g/mile) on the CFDS test.
Since sulfates usually decrease with mileage(7>29), this was the goal at 6500
km also.

     The plan was to run an  "as-received" test series on the car, then install
the air modulation system and begin distance accumulation.  The test series
used for this and all subsequent testing is shown in Table 24.  From the be-
ginning, the testing did not proceed smoothly.  Higher than expected CO emis-
sions from the as-received tests, and confusion over the correct idle intake
manifold vacuum caused additional unscheduled tests and prolonged the actual
optimization testing.

     Confusion over the correct idle vacuum resulted when the idle intake mani-
fold vacuum was measured at 10 inches of mercury gauge.  This value is con-
siderably different from the 16 to 18 inches of mercury normally seen on carbu-
reted engines of U.S. manufacturer.  Conflicting information was at first re-
ceived from Volvo of America and the local  area Service Representative.  The
final outcome was that 10 inches of mercury was a reasonable level of idle
vacuum for B21F Volvo engines.

     Over 40 emissions tests were performed during the optimization of the
modulated air injection system.  The tests  were performed with the car in one

                                      85

-------
                 TABLE 24.   PHASE II TEST SEQUENCE


 *1.   Precondition,  LA-4

  2.   Soak 12 to 20  hours

  3.   FTP - 3 bags for gaseous emissions

**4.   Soak 1.25 to 1.5 hours hood closed

**5.   Precondition first 505 seconds of LA-4

  6.   Idle 1 minute  (± 15 seconds)
        (a) auto trans - drive
        (b) start additional cooling fan
        (c) Place filter holder in tunnel

  7.   SET - 1 bag gaseous emissions
            1 filter sample

  8.   Engine off - 5 minutes

  9.   HFET - 1 bag gaseous  emissions
 * If necessary, drain fuel tank of distance accumulation
   fuel and refill with emissions test fuel.
 **Steps 4 and 5 were omitted during optimization testing,
   but were included for baseline and final configuration
   test.
                                   86

-------
of three hardware configurations:   (1)  stock;   (2)  maximum air to oxidation
catalyst; and  (3)  all or part of the air modulation system.  The last hardware
category included tests with and without exhaust manifold air injection.

A.   Tests in Stock Configuration

     Following receipt of the car from the dealer, a complete series of emis-
sion tests (FTP, CFDS and HFET) were performed on the car in the condition
received.  Several times during optimization of the modulated air system, the
vehicle was returned to stock condition and an FTP performed to obtain stock
condition emissions.  The results of all stock condition FTP tests performed
during optimization are shown in Table 25.  Also shown in the table are the
certification values for the 1978 Volvo 244D with B21F engine.

     The as-received CO emissions were more than twice the certification value,
while the as-received NOX emissions were lower.  The fact that the CO was
higher and NOX lower than certification values was taken as indicating that the
engine was controlled to a richer A/F ratio than the certification ratio.  The
FTP fuel economy was also lower than the certification level,supporting the
assumption that the engine was set richer.  It was decided to leave the A/F
ratio setting as received  to take advantage of the extremely low NOX levels
obtained with this setting.  The oxidation catalyst to be installed behind the
threeway catalyst would then be depended on to provide sufficient CO control
to meet the project CO goal.  For the next four months during the optimization
procedure, there were indications that the oxidation catalyst with modulated
air injection would not be sufficient to meet the project goals with high CO
emissions in stock condition.  There were also intermittent indications of
fuel system malfunction characterized by sudden, unexplainably, large increases
in CO.  An attempt on September 29, 1978, to obtain the certification emis-
sion levels by leaning the A/F ratio did result in CO emissions somewhat below
the certification value.  However, the NOX emissions increased to well above
the certification level, as shown in Table 25.

     It was not until after a significant number of fuel system components had
been replaced by representatives of Volvo of America in January, 1979, that good
agreement was obtained between the stock FTP emissions and the certification
values.  See the January 16, 1979, test results in Table 25.  The stock configu-
ration tests performed in March,1979, at the end of the optimization procedure,
also were in good agreement with the certification values.

B.   Tests With Maximum Air

     The stock emission control system on the Volvo was converted to a threeway
plus oxidation catalyst system, as described in Section IV-1, following the
as-received emission tests.  Currently, the normal operating method for three-
way plus oxidation catalyst systems is to provide the full output of the air
pump to the oxidation catalyst at all times after the first minute or so of a
cold start.  It is this large amount of often unneeded air that contributes to
the high sulfate emissions of such systems.  A threeway plus oxidation catalyst
with maximum air injection thus served as a baseline system for reductions in
sulfate emissions using the air modulation system.
                                      87

-------
            TABLE 25.  TEST RESULTS FROM  1978  "CALIFORNIA" VOLVO
                           IN STOCK CONFIGURATION
Gaseous Emissions, g/km (g/mile) mg/km
Date
HC
CO
NOX (mg/mi)
FTP Tests
7/27/78
7/28/78
9/20/78
9/29/78
1/16/79
3/19/79
3/20/79
9/28/79
Cert. Value
0.24(0.39)
0.33(0.52)
0.17(0.27)
0.02(0.03)
0.18(0.30)
0.12(0.20)
0.15(0.25)
0.17(0.27)
(0.2)
3.94(6.34)
5.19(8.34)
4.13(6.64)
1.23(1.98)
2.48(3.99)
2.61(4.21)
2.25(3.62)
2.59(4.16)
(3)
0.02(0.03)
0.01(0.02)
0.06(0.09)
0.37(0.60)
0.09(0.14)
0.07(0.12)
0.05(0.08)
0.36(0.58)
(0.1)
                                                                      &/100 km  (mpg)
                                                                      14.09(16.70)
                                                                      14.25(16.51)
                                                                      12.49(18.33)
                                                                      11.07(21.25)
                                                                      12.23(19.23)
                                                                      12.32(19.09)
                                                                      12.27(19.17)
                                                                      11.55(20.37)
                                                                           (20)
7/27/78
9/20/78
0.14(0.22)
0.10(0.17)
                                 CFDS Tests
2.56(4.12)
2.43(3.91)
0.01(0.02)
0.07(0.11)
0.11(0.18)
0.16(0.26)
11.10(21.19)
10.34(22.75)
7/27/78
9/20/78
Cert, value
0.11(0.18)
0.10(0.16)
                                 HFET Tests
2.12(3.42)
2.37(3.82)
0.01(0.01)
0.05(0.08)
                9.45(24.65)
                9.45(24.67)
                     (25)
                                      88

-------
     The first test of the threeway plus oxidation catalyst system with max-
imum air was run on August 29, 1978.  The purpose of this test was to insure
that project gaseous emission goals could be met with maximum air injected
into the catalyst.  Obviously, if the goals could not be met with maximum air,
there would be no point in trying to meet the emission goals with less air.

     As can be seen from Table 26, replicate tests performed on August 29 and
30, 1978, demonstrated that the project gaseous emission goals for HC and NOX
could be met.  However, CO emissions were slightly higher than goal.  CFDS
tests for sulfates were not run because the catalyst was new and still storing
sulfates.

     Despite the somewhat high CO emissions, catalyst and emission control
system seasoning for 4800 km  (3000 miles) was begun.  Maximum air injection
to the oxidation catalyst was used during the distance accumulation to com-
pletely season the catalyst at high oxygen levels.

     On September 19, 1979, after completing 4800 km of durability driving, a
complete series of tests was run with maximum air to the catalyst.  The test
results are presented in Table 26.  The purpose of this test was to determine
sulfate emissions from the car with the addition of an air injected oxidation
catalyst.  Note that sulfate emissions from the CFDS in this configuration
are approximately 130 times higher than the CFDS sulfate emissions from the
stock configuration shown in Table 25.  These results once again demonstrate
the high sulfate levels that can result from threeway plus oxidation catalyst
systems.  The FTP CO level from this test, while below the 1981 standard, was
still higher than the project low service goal.

     Following this test, A/F ratio was set leaner and the air modulation
system activated.  After an additional 800 km of durability driving, a
complete test series was run on October 10, 1978.  The October 10, 1978,
test series was planned as a test of the air modulation system.  However,
examination of the raw exhaust emission traces and visual inspection of the
air modulation system indicated that the air modulation components were not
functioning, so that oxidation catalyst received maximum air.  Thus, this test
was used as another baseline test with maximum air.

     The test results are shown in Table 26.  The gaseous emissions reflect
a leaner A/F ratio with lower CO than the previous test and higher NOX,
(because A/F ratio is further away from optimum NOX reduction).  The CFDS
sulfate emissions of 74.9 mg/km  (120.5 mg/mile) were almost 4 times higher
than the previous test.  This level is not unusual for threeway plus oxida-
tion catalyst system.(5,7)  The sulfate increase was probably the result of
increased sulfate storage from the additional distance accumulation and
leaner A/F ratio.  This test series was used as the final maximum air baseline
during the optimization testing.

     The system was not operated with maximum air injection again until after
the conclusion of distance durability testing.  The results from the maximum
air test at 65200  km  (40,500 miles) are also shown in Table 27.  The FTP
gaseous emissions were still below the 1981 standards.  The CFDS sulfate emis-
sions decreased to 7.8 mg/km  (12.5 mg/mile).  This decrease with distance


                                      89

-------
TABLE 26.  TEST RESULTS FROM 1978  "CALIFORNIA" VOLVO  WITH THREEWAY CATALYST
                   PLUS AIR INJECTED OXIDATION CATALYST
Date
8/29/78
8/30/78
9/19/78
10/10/78
9/24/79
9/19/78
10/10/78
9/24/79
9/19/78
10/10/78
9/24/79
Test
Type
FTP
FTP
FTP
FTP
FTP
CFDS
CFDS
CFDS
HFET
HFET
HFET
Gaseous Emissions,

0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
HC
.16(0.
.16(0.
.01(0.
.04(0.
.18(0.
.04(0.
.00(0.
.04(0.
.04(0.
.01(0.
.02(0.

26)
26)
17)
06)
29)
06)
00)
07)
07)
02)
03)

1
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
CO
.48(2.
.38(2.
.74(2.
.39(2.
.52(2.
.07(0.
.01(0.
.17(0.
.05(0.
.01(0.
.06(0.
g/km (g/mile)
NOX
39)
22)
80)
24)
45)
11)
02)
28)
08)
01)
10)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.16(0.
.15(0.
.10(0.
.29(0.
.36(0.
.13(0.
.16(0.
.35(0.
.19(0.
.20(0.
.41(0.
26)
25)
17)
47)
58)
21)
26)
56)
30)
32)
67)
H2SO4
mg/km
(mg/mi) &/100 km (mpg)
12.30(19.21)
12.15(19.35)
12.37(19.01)
11.45(20.54)
11.64(20.21)
20.55(33.06) 9.98(23.58)
74.89(120.50) 9.32(25.23)
7.79(12.53) 9.74(24.16)
9.18(25.63)
9.11(25.82)
8.88(26.49)

-------
         TABLE 27.   MASS EMISSIONS FROM COLD START TRANSIENT PHASE
                  OF FTP FOR SELECTED TESTS ON 1978 VOLVO
                                                   First Bag
                                                Emissions  (grams)
                                                    fc Change with
                                                    Manifold Air
Date
9/20/78
9/21/78

Stock
Stock
Configuration
+ manifold air
HC
2.46
2.46
CO
54.47
63.90
HC
0
CO
+17.3
3/1 & 3/5/79
 average
3/6/79
Ox. Cat. + open loop + MODAIR    3.56     34.33
Ox. Cat. + open loop + MODAIR
  + manifold air                 2.32     30.51
                                                                   -34.8
        -11.1
9/28/79
9/26/79
Stock            '                3.00     43.94
Stock + aspirated manifold air   3.12     41.62
+ 4.0
-5.3
                                      91

-------
accumulation is characteristic of sulfate emissions.(7,28,29)

C.   Tests with Exhaust Manifdld Air Injection

     One possible way to reduce emissions is to inject air directly into the
exhaust manifold while the catalyst  is warming up to  operating temperature
during a cold start.  Several times during the optimization testing of the
Volvo, an evaluation of the effectiveness of cold start exhaust manifold air
injection was attempted.  However, because of the previously explained numerous
problems encountered during optimization, only three sets of comparisons  were
useable.

     The first comparison was performed on September 20 and 21, 1978.  The
first test was in stock condition.  The second test was run with the air pump
discharging into the exhaust manifold during the first 60 seconds of the cold
start, then dumping to atmosphere.  The remainder of the emission control
system was in stock condition.  Since the cold start air injection affects
only the cold start transient phase  (first bag) of the FTP, its effectiveness
should be evaluated by examination of first bag emissions.

     Table 27 presents HC and CO emissions in grams for the first bag of the
FTP test, together with the percent change in emissions with manifold air
injection.  As can be seen from the table, the manifold air injection test on
September 21 had higher CO emissions than the test without manifold air in-
jection on September 20.  The reason for this increase is not known.  One
possible explanation is that there was too much air injected, so that the
additional air quickly cooled the exhaust below the temperature required
to convert CO to CO2-

     The next comparison check of manifold air injection was performed in
March, 1979.  The purpose of this comparison was to determine if manifold air
injection would help the modulated air system developed for this project.  In
this case, the emission control configuration consisted of the oxidation
catalyst with modulated air injection and an open loop A/F ratio control cir-
cuit for cold starts.   (See Figures 25 and 30).

     This configuration was tested on March 1 and 5, 1979.  The average first
bag HC and CO emissions from these tests are shown in Table 27.  The manifold
air injection was then installed and tested on March 6, 1979.  The first bag
HC and CO mass emissions from this test are also shown in Table 27.  Note that
CO is approximately 11 percent lower with the manifold air injection.  The
modulated air system continusouly dumped a portion of the air pump discharge.
Thus, only part of air pump discharge was available for manifold injection.

     The last investigation of exhaust manifold air injection was performed
following the durability testing.  For this investigation, a reed valve aspira-
tion system, similar to Canadian Volvo model, was used.  It is compared to the
stock condition test run at the completion of durability testing in Table 27.
In this case, there was a 5.3 percent reduction in CO emissions with the cold
start exhaust manifold air injection.  While no detailed investigation of air
injection rates was conducted from the three sets of tests presented here, it
appears that there may be an optimum air injection rate, with higher CO


                                      92

-------
emissions from air injection rates either higher or lower than optimum.

D.   Tests to Optimize the Air Modulation System

     Over twenty tests were run with various parts of the air modulation
system installed on the Volvo.  However, many of them were performed to
investigate the apparent fuel system problem or merely to adjust the A/F
ratio in steps to obtain the best A/F ratio for use with the air modulation
system.  Of these many tests, seven tests are presented in Table 28 to show
the evolution of the final modulated air injection system.

     Prior to beginning the optimization of the air modulation system, 4830km
(3000 miles) of durability driving was accumulated.  The complete air modula-
tion system was installed and functioning during the distance accumulation,
except for the threeway vacuum solenoid and air pump centrifugal clutch.
However, the air modulation valve was bypassed so that the oxidation catalyst
received the full air pump discharge.

     The air modulation system was completed in early October 1978, with the
installation of the air pump centrifugal clutch.  The idle CO was adjusted
richer, from 0.6 percent to 1.4 percent  (with the oxygen sensor disconnected).
An FTP test was run on October 5, 1978, to check the system operation.  The
results of the test are shown in Table 28.  The HC emissions met the target
low mileage emission goal, but the CO and NOX did not.  However, the emissions
results were encouraging,considering no system optimization had been done.

     While checking the setting of the air modulation valve prior to the
October 5 test, it was found that the idle vacuum was only 10 inches of mercury
(gauge pressure).  This was considerably below the usual 16 to 18 inches of
mercury seen on carbureted cars of U.S. manufacture.  The investigation as to
whether or not this vacuum level was correct  delayed the optimization testing
almost two months.

     While in the process of checking the vacuum level with the manufacturer,
continuous CO traces from the first few tests were analyzed.  When setting up
the air modulation schedule for the air modulation valve, it was assumed that
there would be CO excursions during accelerations, as there were with the two
carbureted engines on which the system was previously used.  The CO traces
from the Volvo showed, however, that the Lambda-Sond system handled accelera-
tions well and that most of the CO spikes were during decelerations.  The air
modulation valve required some modification to provide air during decelerations
rather than accelerations.  In addition, the traces indicated that changes to
the air flow schedule were required.  The final air injection versus manifold
vacuum curve for the valve is shown in Figure 31.  By the end of November, 1978,
the idle vacuum had finally been determined to be correct.  The air modulation
system was now ready for additional testing on the car.

     During the FTP tests  run  on  December  1,  1978,  continuous  CO  values in-
creased two to  five times  after about  280  seconds into the test.   A repeat
test on December  4 showed  the  same  high  CO values throughout the  tests.
Checks of  the idle CO  and  oxygen  sensor  did not reveal any abnormalities.
                                      93

-------
   100
C
0)
o
                   4     6      8    10    12    14    16    18    20    22



                     Manifold Vacuum,  inches of Mercury gauge
           Figure 31.  Air modulation valve air flow calibration

                               on 1978 Volvo
                                     94

-------
     Another delay in the optimization testing was then encountered,while the
help of Volvo of America was sought and received.  In January 1979, under the
direction of personnel from Volvo of America, the fuel distributor and all
four fuel injectors were replaced in the course of correcting the high CO
problem.  This apparently corrected a problem in the fuel system that had
existed since the car was received from the dealer.

     Optimization testing resumed in late January, 1979.  Tests run in early
December, 1978,had indicated that the air pump was supplying too much air to
the oxidation catalyst, resulting in higher than desired sulfate levels.  By
utilizing the fact that the static pressure of the flowing exhaust gases is
normally lower than atmospheric pressure, ambient air can be drawn into the
exhaust pipe, in a manner similar to an eductor without using the air pump.

     A number of tests were run in this configuration with progressively
leaner A/F ratios.  The best overall gaseous emission results were from the
test on February 5, 1979, as shown in Table 28.  The HC and NOX emissions
from this test met the project goals, but CO was still above the project goal.

     Following this test, CO emissions were examined on a bag-by-bag basis.
Approximately 90 percent of the composite CO level was from the first bag.
From the raw exhaust CO traces, it was determined that the majority of the
first bag CO came from approximately the first minute of operation.

     To reduce the CO emissions during the cold start, the open loop fuel
control circuit described in Section IV-1 was installed on the car.

     The first test of this system was on February 7,  1979.   The test results
are shown in Table 28.  The first bag CO for this test was 32.5 grams,  compared
with 42.0 grams for the first bag of the previous test on February 5.   This was
a reduction of 23 percent in the first bag.

     The open loop system had proven effective.   However, the CO emissions were
still not within the  project goals  for 6500 km.  An examination of the raw
exhaust oxygen trace  indicated  that the CO emissions would benefit from
slightly more oxygen.  Therefore, the air pump was reconnected to the air
injection system, but with  a large portion of the air pump discharge dumped
to  the  atmosphere.  However, the  cold start manifold air  injection was not
connected.  A test was run  in this  configuration on February 12, 1979.  The
composite CO from this test was 1.23 g/km.  As can be seen in Table 28, HC
and NOX were below the project  goals.  This was the lowest CO level achieved
during the optimization testing.

     In an effort to  further reduce first bag CO levels,  cold start air in-
jection to the exhaust manifolds was reconnected.  Tests  run with this system
did not give the expected results.  After considerable investigation, the
problem was found to be a leak  in the diverter valve allowing air to be
injected into the exhaust manifold.  A manually operated  shutoff valve was
installed in the manifold air injection line to stop air  leakage into the
exhaust manifold.
                                      95

-------
                         TABLE 28.  FTP TEST RESULTS FROM 1978 "CALIFORNIA" VOLVO
                                                       Gaseous Emissions, g/km  (g/mile)
                                                                                   Fuel
  Date

:0/5/78

12/1/78

2/5/79

2/7/79


2/12/79

3/6/79


3/12/79
      Configuration

3-way + ox. + MODAIR

3-way + ox. + MODAIR

3-way + ox. + amb. MODAIRa

3-way + ox. + amb. MODAIR
 + open loop

3-way + ox. + MODAIR + open loop

3-way + ox. + MODAIR + open loop
 + manifold air

3-way + ox. + MODAIR + open loop
 + manifold air
HC
0.07
0.14
0.10
0.11
0.10
(0.
(0.
(0.
(0.
(0.
11)
23)
16)
18)
16)
1
1
1
1
1
CO
.16(1
.79(2
.69(2
.36(2
.23(1

.87)
.88)
.72)
-19)
.98)

0
0
0
0
0
NOX
.47(0
.21(0
.15(0
.13(0
.12(0
&/100 km
.75)
.34)
.25)
.20)
.19)
10
11
11
11
11
.72(21
.26(20
.72(20
.81(19
.08(21
(mpg)
.94)
.88)
.08)
.91)
.23)
0.11(0.18)
                                                    0.14(0.23)
1.31(2.10)
              1.31(2.10)
0.15(0.24)
              0.13(0.23)
11.72(20.08)


11.61(20.26)
 amb. MODAIR refers to modulated air injection from ambient air  (no air pump).

-------
     An FTP test was run on March 6, 1979, with air to the exhaust manifold
during the first 56 seconds of the cold start.  There was a reduction in the
first bag CO of approximately 10 percent.  The first bag CO was reduced from
an average of 34.3 grams for the two previous tests without manifold injection
to 30.5 grams with manifold injection.

     Examination of the CO traces taken during February and March seemed to
indicate some sort of intermittent fuel system malfunction.  Further testing
was postponed while the fuel system was throughly cleaned and a new fuel
filter installed.  A test on March 12, 1979, produced results similar to the
March 6 test.   (See Table 28).

     After discussing these results with the EPA, it was decided that the system
was as close to  the project goals as possible without expending unreasonable
additional effort, and that the durability testing should begin.  Thus, the
test on March 12, 1979, closes the optimization phase of the project.  The
predurability emission goals were met for HC, NOX and sulfate.  The CO emission
level was approximately 0.25 g/km higher than the goal of 1.06 g/km.

     The final  emission control system consisted of the stock Lambda-Sond
system, plus the items listed below:

     • a monolithic oxidation catalyst after the threeway catalyst

     • a modulated air injection system to the oxidation catalyst

     • cold start air injection to the exhaust manifolds

     • a separate open loop fuel control for cold starts.

     It should  be pointed out that while the FTP gaseous emissions from the
oxidation catalyst with modulated air system can be compared with the stock
system to determine improvements resulting from the new system, the sulfate
emissions should not be compared to the stock system.

     It is well documented that threeway catalyst systems have low sulfate
emissions.  However, when an air injected oxidation catalyst is added behind
the threeway system, tailpipe sulfate emissions can be quite high.  Therefore,
sulfate emissions from the air modulation system should be compared with tests
on the air injected oxidation catalyst system without air modulation.  These
tests were run  on the Volvo on September 19, 1978,and October 10, 1978.  A
comparison of the CFDS sulfate emissions for the stock system and air injected
system oxidation catalyst system with and without air modulation is shown in
Table 29.  Since a number of changes were made in the fuel system of the car
between October 1978, and March 1979, the FTP gaseous emissions for the two
emission control system configurations are not comparable.
                                      97

-------
                                    TABEL 29.  COMPARISON OF EMISSIONS ON 1978 VOLVO
                                    WITH THREE EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM CONFIGURATIONS

U.i 1 1;
')/20/78
''/19/78
10/10/78
3/16/79
y/20/78
9/19/78
10/10/78
3/16/79
Test
Type
FTP
FTP
FTP
FTP
CFDS
CFDS
CFDS
CFDS
Gaseous
Configuration
Stock
Stock + ox.
Stock + ox.
Stock + ox.
Stock
Stock + ox.
Stock + ox.
Stock + ox.
cat. -
cat. -
cat. -

cat. -
cat. -
cat. -
t- Air
f Air
f MODAIR0

f Air
t- Air
t- MODAIR
0
0
0
0
0
0
<0
<0
HC
.17(0.
.10(0.
.04(0.
.10(0.
.10(0.
.04(0.
.01(<0
.01(<0

27)
17)
06)
15)
17)
06)
.02)
.02)
Emissions, g/km
CO
4.13(6
1.74(2
1.39(2
1.25(2
2.43(3
0.07(0
0.01(0
0.66(1
NOX
.64)
.80)
.24)
.24)
.91)
.11)
.02)
.06)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.06(0
.10(1
.29(0
.13(0
.07(0
.13(0
.16(0
.08(0
.09)
.17)
.47)
.22)
.11)
.21)
.26)
.14)
H2S04
mg/km





0.16(0.26)
20.55(33.06)
74.89(120.50)
0.04(0.06)

Fuel

£/100 km
12
12
11
12
10
9
9
9
.49(18.
.37(19.
.45(20.
.18(19.
.34(22.
.98(23.
.32(25.
.75(24.
83)
01)
54)
32)
75)
58)
23)
13)
en    Numbers in parentheses are g/mile (mg/mile for H2SO4) except for fuel which is miles/gallons
     Lambda-Sond system with oxidation catalyst with air pump
    CLambda-Sond system with oxidation catalyst and modulated air from air pump

-------
                  IV-3.  DURABILITY TESTING OF 1978 VOLVO
     With the gaseous emissions from air modulation system installed on the
Volvo at a satisfactory level, the durability demonstration was begun.  For
distance accumulation, the car was driven on the road course shown in Figure
4, Section II.  The distance accumulation procedure as explained in Section
II was used.  Emission tests were performed every 8050 km (50000 miles).

A.   Distance Accumulation Chronology

     Distance was being accumulated on the car throughout the optimization
phase.  With the exception of the open loop fuel control circuit and the
solenoid shutoff valve in the manifold air injection line, all emission
control hardware had been installed on the car at approximately 160 km
(100 miles).  Thus, the air modulation system hardware had accumulated as
much service as the other systems on the car.  The idea was to produce an
optimized system at 8050 km, with emissions at a level that would allow for
some further deterioration.  This was to avoid being misled by low emissions
from an unseasoned catalyst which would increase rapidly for the first few
thousand kilometers as the catalyst aged.  Since the car had accumulated
approximately 8050 km  (5000 miles) during optimization testing, it was
driven for only 320 km  (200 miles) on the durability driving schedule to
stabilize the sulfate emissions prior to the 8050 km test series.

     Following the 8050 km tests, the car was returned to stock condition
and tested twice on the FTP cycle to obtain a 8050 km stock baseline.  The
air modulation system was reconnected and distance accumulation on a con-
tinuous basis begun on March 25, 1979.

     A graphical representation of the distance accumulation records is
presented in Figure 32, which shows daily distance, maintenance, and
emission test points.  This figure can be referred to as necessary for
clarification of the order of events.

     Scheduled maintenance was performed every 12,070 km (7500 miles) as
specified in the Volvo service manual.  A summary of the required main-
tenance is shown in Table 30.  Unscheduled maintenance was performed as
required.  Unscheduled maintenance is also shown on Figure 32.

     Distance accumulation continued until September 14, 1978, when 64,400 km
(40,000miles) of service had been accumulated.  At that time, distance ac-
cumulation was halted due to funding limitations.

     Following the 64,400 km durability test, the air modulation system was
bypassed so that all of the air pump discharge went directly to the oxidation

                                     99

-------
o
o
   Vi
   M
   Q)
   4J

   CJ


   O
   U-l
   o
u;
3
O
si
   13
   (U
   3


   3
   U
   U
   (1)
   U
   c
   en
   •H
   Q
       70
    60
       50
       40
    30
    20
       10
                    D
                    O
                     Emission tests


                     Scheduled maintenance  (See Table 30)


                     Unscheduled maintenance

                      A  Repaired centrifugal clutch


                      <&  Replaced all  brake pads


                      &>  Repaired centrifugal clutch
               March
                            April
May
June
                                                             1979
July
August
September
                                       32.   Distances  aocurrvula tion
                                                                          of 1978 Volvo 244DI,.

-------
                              TABLE  30.   VOLVO  MAINTENANCE SCHEDULE
0000
o o  o o
""1 O  O O
X
X
X
X
X
X
X

X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X

X
X

X
X
X

X
X
X
X
'X
jx
f 	
X
X
X



























X






X






X


X







X





















X.






















































—



           Op.
           Ho.    'In  drivers  Seat
            1      Check Brake Vacuum Booster  Function.
            2      Check Brake Pedal, operation for  Leak-
                  age in System.
            3      Check and adjust Parking  Brake.
            4      Check operation  of Instrument  Panel
                  Indicator Lights.
            5      Check Automatic  Transmission Gear
                  Selector.
            6      Check Seat Belt  and Warning Light  and
                  Buzzer.
                  Exterior
           "7-10   Lubricate Door,  Hood and  Trunk,
                  Hinges, Latches  and Locks.
           11      Check Gas Cap Seal.
                  On  Lift
           12      Check Steering gear Function.
           13      Check Front End  Suspension  for Wear.
           14      Check Front Wheel bearings.
           15      Check Control arm Bushing and  Strut
                  Attachment.
           16      Check Steering Rod play.
           17      Check Steering Rack for Axial  play.
           18      Check Front Wheel balance.
           19      Check' Front Wheel bearings  for noise.
           20      Check Front Tire wear pattern.
           21      Check Steering Rack Rubber  Bellows.
           22      Check Steering Rack Attachment.
           23      Check Front Ball Joints.
           24      Check Steering Rod ends.
           25      Check Front Control Arm Bushings.
           26      Check Stabilizer Bar Bushings.
           27      Check Front Shock Absorbers.
           28      Check Front Spring Attachment.
           29      Check Brake Hoses.
           30      Check Front Wheel Brakes.
           31      Check Clutch play.
           32      Check Transmission for leaks.
           33      Change Manual Transmission  oil.
           34      Adjust Automatic Transmission  Gear
                  Selector.
           35      Check Brake and  Fuel Lines.
           36      Check Drive Shaft Bolts and Joints.
           37      Check Catalytic  Converter Mounting
                  Bolts.
           38      Check Exhaust System.
           39      Check Rubber Bellows on Parking
                  Brake Cables.
           40      Check Rear Axle  oil level.
           41      Check rear Shock Absorbers.
           42      Check Rear Suspension
           43      Check Rear Tire  Wear.
           44      Clean Fuel Tank  Filter.
           45      Check for Engine Leaks.
           46      Drain Engine Oil.
           47      Change Engine Oil Filter.
           48.    Check Rear Wheel Brakes.
                                                      101
0 0 O O
0 O O 0
in O O O
r- ^ o i/)
T~ r-i T
X ,
X ;
X
xl

X

X
X



X

X





X














X




X
X

X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X


X






X

X
X

X
X

X

X
X
X
y.
X
X
X
X

X
X
X


X
X
X
















X




X
X











X








X




X





X




















X





X


































       Ur.de--.' Hood
49     Fill Engine  oil.
50     Check Brake  Reservoir Level.
51     Check Clutch Reservoir Level  (260 only)
52     Check Steering  gear  for  leaks.
53     Change coolant.
54     Check Engine Coolant Freezing point.
55     Check Cooling System - Pressure Test.
56     Check Battery Level, Terminals and
       Mounting.
57     Check and  adjust  Engine  Throttle
       Cable.
58     Change Air Filter.
59     Change Fuel  Filter  (CI System).
60     Change Chargoal Canister.
61     Check and  adjust  Engine  Drive Belts.
62     Inspect and Clean, PCV valve.
63     Check Torque of Manifold Bolts
       (B20, only).
64     Replace Spark Plugs.
65     Adjust Timing Gear Belt  (B21 only).
66     Change Timing Gear Belt  (240 only).
67     Adjust Valves (B21).
68-70  Adjust Valves (B27).
71     Adjust Valve Clearance  (B20 only)
72     Clean E.G.R. Valve.
73     Change E.G.R. Valve.
74     Reset E.G.R. Reminder Light.
75-76  Check Throttle  Switch -  Adjust.
77-78  Lubricate Distributor.
79     Connect Engine  Test Instrument.
80     Check Battery Test  Voltage.
81     Check Battery Starting  Voltage.
82     Check and Install Distributor Cap.
83-84  Check and Adjust Timing.
65     Check Distributor Centrifugal Advance.
86     Check vacuum retard.
87     Check Exhaust Gas Recirculation.
88     Adjust Idle.
89     Check Automatic Transmission  Fluid
       Level.
90     Check Fuel Lines for Tightness
       Underhood.
91     Check Electrical Wires  under  Hood.
92-93  Check Function of Diverter Valve.
94-116 Check Engine CO and HC Emission.
117   Check and Adjust Throttle Wire BW 35.
118   Check and Adjust Throttle Wire BW 55.
119   Adjust Reverse Band (BW 35).
 120   Check Tire  Pressure.
 121   Check and Adjust Headlight Alignment.
       Road Test
 122   Engine Performance.
 123   Electrical  System   Operation.
 124   Drive Train   Operation, Noise.
 125   Brakes    Performance.
 126   Steering  and Handling   Performance.
 127   Suspension   Noise.
 128   Body  Noise,  Leakage

-------
catalyst after the first 56 seconds of the cold start.   During this time,
the air pump discharge was routed to the exhaust manifold.   The car was
driven for 500 miles on the durability driving course to  season the cata-
lyst.  A full test series (FTP, SET, HFET) followed the distance accumula-
tion to obtain gaseous emissions and sulfate using the full air pump capa-
city.  The purpose of this test was to obtain a 64,400 km baseline CFDS test
for sulfate emissions.

     For a final comparison test, the car was returned to stock condition
and an FTP test run.  This test was the 64,400 km stock condition baseline
for comparison of FTP gaseous emissions.

B.   Fuel and Oil Consumption

     Unleaded gasoline meeting the requirements of 40 CFR,  paragraph
86.113-79 was used for distance accumulation.  The fuel was designated
within SwRI as EM-344-F-  An analysis of the fuel is given in Table 1,
Section II.  Shell 20W-50 motor oil was used throughout the distance
accumulation.  Fuel and oil consumption between emission tests is listed
in Table 31.  Fuel consumption is consistent but somewhat below the level
expected in the intervals between emission tests.  Since only two quarts
of oil were added during the entire 64,400 km (40,000 miles)  of distance
accumulation, the oil consumption appears erratic.  In general, it can be
said that the car used less than a quart of oil between oil changes
(12,070 km or 7500 miles), with the oil starting at the correct capacity
after each oil change.

C.   Emission Test Results

     The results of all the 8050 km interval emission tests (average of
duplicate tests where appropriate) and the 8050 km and 64,400 km stock
condition tests are presented in Table 32.  The emission results are also
presented graphically in Figures 33 and 34.  As can be seen from the table
and figures, both HC and CO increased steadily over the 64,400 km, while
NOX, after a step increase at 24,135 km (15,000 miles)  after maintenance,
remained approximately constant.  The CFDS sulfate emissions, listed in
Table 33 and shown graphically in Figure 34, also remained approximately
constant during the 64,400 kilometers.

     A linear regression was performed for each emission type as a function
of distance.  The regression lines and equations are shown in Figures 33 and
34.  Extrapolating the HC and NOX emissions to 80,400 km (50,000 miles)
using the regression equations indicated that these emissions would still
be within  the 1981 Federal standards at that point.  A similar extrapo-
lation of the CFDS sulfate emissions indicated that they would be within
the project goal at 80,400 km.

     Thus, the emission control system appears able to meet the 1981 Federal
gaseous emission standards, except for CO, while maintaining low sulfate
levels.
                                    102

-------
                TABLE 31.  FUEL AND OIL CONSUMPTION DURING
                     DURABILITY TESTING OF  1978 VOLVO
Distance
Interval
km (miles)
0-8050
(0-5000)
Fuel
a/100 km (mpg)
13.44(17.50)
Oil Consumption
VlOOO km
(qt/1000 mi)
no oil added
8050-16100
(5000-10000)

16100-24150
(10000-15000)

24150-32200
(15000-20000)

32200-40250
(20000-25000)

40250-48300
(25000-30000)

48300-56350
(30000-35000)

56350-64400
(35000-40000)

Overall
13.16(17.88)


13.23(17.78)


12.93(18.19)


12.87(18.28)


12.91(18.22)


12.86(18.30)


12.59(18.69)

13.00(18.09)
0.14(0.24)
no oil added
0.12(0.21)
no oil added
no oil added
no oil added
no oil added
0.03(0.05)
                                     103

-------
              TABLE 32.  FTP EMISSIONS FOR 1978 VOLVO  244 WITH  AIR
              MODULATION DURING 64,400 KILOMETER DURABILITY TESTING
Distance
Accumulated
km (miles)
8050(5000)

Emissions g/km (g/mile)
HC
0.14(0.


CO
NOX
8050 stock baseline
22) 2.43(3.91)
0
Durability Testing of Air Modulation
8100(5035)

15,526(9649)
24,154(15,
24,212(15,
32,000(19,
40,280(25,
48,157(29,
48,238(29,
56,262(34,
64,370(40,
012)
048)a
955)
035)
930)
980 )a
967)
006)
0.10(0.
0.09(0.
0.12(0.
0.12(0.
0.14(0.
0.19(0.
0.17(0.
0.18(0.
0.19(0.
0.16(0.
16)
14)
19)
19)
23)
31)
28)
29)
31)
25)
1
1
2
1
2
1
1
1
2
2
.28(2
.38(2
.09(3
.27(2
.00(3
.66(2
.77(2
.71(2
.45(3
.27(3
.05)
.22)
.36)
.04)
.22)
.68)
.85)
.76)
.94)
.65)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.06(0
.10)
Fuel
Si/100 km (mpg)
12
.30(19.13)
System
.14(0
.14(0
.09(0
.38(0
.32(0
.41(0
.41(0
.43(0
.37(0
.34(0
.22)
-22)
.15)
.61)
.52)
.65)
.66)
.69)
-59)
.55)
12
12
11
12
12
11
12
12
11
11
.23(19.24)
.30(19.12)
.90(19.77)
.37(19.01)
.44(18.92)
.97(19.67)
.13(19.39)
.11(19.42)
.87(19.82)
.50(20.46)
65,900(41,000)
          64,400 km stock baseline

0.17(0.27)         2.59(4.16)
0.36(0.58)
11.55(20.37)
                                       104

-------
   0.5
   0.4
I  0.3
u
s
    0.1
                                          1981  Standard
HC = 0.083 +((1.737 x 10~6)x km)



r2 = 0.730
               After Maintenance
^
8
                                          1981 Standard
                                                    CO = 1.193 +((16.44 x 10 6)x  km)



                                                    r2 = 0.534
                                                                           _L
                 10        20       30       40         50       60        70



                        Distance Accumulated,  thousands of kilometers
                               80
         Figure 33.  HC and CO emissions from a 1978 Volvo with Lambda-Sond


           plus oxidation catalyst and modair as a function of distance
                                         105

-------
   0.8
   0.6
E

Cn

 x  0.4
o
z

a,
   0.2
                                   1981 Federal  Standard
   NOX = 0.122 + ((5.01  x  10  6)x km)


   r2  = 0.505
                After Maintenance
 Cn
 £
 OJ
 4-)

 tl
 P
en

to
Q
t,
u
                                         Project  Goal
                               •€>-
                                      •e-
    SO."  =  0.068 +((1.56 x 10~6)x km)


     r2   =  0.160
-e-
                  10        20        30       40        50       60


                         Distance Accumulated, thousands of kilometers
                             70
                                      80
      Figure 34.  NOX and sulfate emissions from a 1978 Volvo  with  Lambda-Sond

                oxidation catalyst and modair as a function  of distance
                                         106

-------
TABLE 33.   CFDS SULFATE EMISSIONS FOR  1978 VOLVO  244 WITH  AIR
    MODULATION DURING 64,400 KILOMETRE  DURABILITY  TESTING
       Distance
Accumulated km,  (miles)                 Sulfate  mg/km (ing/mile)
                      Sulfate Baseline

     5,150(3,200)                            74.89(120.50)


       Durability Testing of Air  Modulation System

     8,100(5,035)                             0.04(0.06)
    15,526(9,649)         •                    0.06(0.10)
    24,154(15,012)                            0.09(0.14)
    24,212(15,048)                            0.24(0.39)
    32,000(19,955)                            0.09(0.14)
    40,280(25,035)                            0.15(0.24)
    48,157(29,930)                            0.14(0.23)
    48,238(29,980)(  '                         0.08(0.13)
    56,262(34,967)                            0.25(0.41)
    64,370(40,600)                            0.11(0.18)


                 64,400  km  Sulfate  Baseline

    65,164(40,500)                            7.79(12.53)
                              107

-------
     An examination of the stock configuration emissions in Table 32 shows
that the additional oxidation catalyst is required only for CO control.
The threeway catalyst alone is capable of meeting the 1981 standards for
HC and NOX.  If gaseous emissions from the stock condition tests are plotted
as a function of distance accumulated, as shown in Figure 35, it can be seen
that the CO deterioration rate is much lower for the stock vehicle than for
the air modulation system.  Thus, the increase in CO over the 64,400 kilo-
meters was almost entirely due to deterioration of the oxidation catalyst/
air modulation system.

     The sulfate emission reduction seen in Figure 36 for the maximum air
injection tests agreed well with sulfate reduction seen in a previous pro-
ject using air injected oxidation catalysts.^)
                                    108

-------
0.7

0.6

0.5
0.4

0.3

0.2

0.1
0

0.3


0.2
                              1981 Standard
      D
o. i
                            1981 Standard
          Q-
                         Stock
                                                                 -Q
3.0
2.0
1.0
         Q-
                              Stock
                                                                 -B
                             1981 Standard
                            Line  __  _
    0       10        20       30        40       50       60        70
                  Distance Accumulated, Thousands of Kilometers
    Figure  35.   FTP gaseous  emissions  as  a  function  of  distance  driven
             for two emission  control  systems  on a 1978 Volvo
                                                                               80
                                    109

-------
   80
   70
   60
    50
in

o
•rH
U)
CO
w
0)
4-1
    40
30
    20
    10
                       Project Goal
                        SwRI System Regression Line
                                                                 I
                10        20       30        40         50        60


                      Distance Accumulated,  Thousands  of  Kilometers
                                                                      70
80
          Figure 36.  CFDS sulfate  emissions  as a function of distance driven

                   for two emission control systems on a 1978 Volvo
                                           110

-------
                              V.  CONCLUSIONS
     The objective of this project was to evaluate the low sulfate emission
ability of several emission control systems capable of meeting 1981 gaseous
emission standards and to test some of these systems for durability.   From
the work accomplished during this project, a number of conclusions may be
derived regarding the effectiveness and durability of the tested emission
control system.

A.   Ability to Produce Low Sulfate Emissions

     For this project, low sulfate emissions were defined as being below
3.1 mg/km (5.0 mg/mi.).  Four systems were evaluated:  (1)  oxidation  cata-
lyst with modulated air injection and EGR: (2)  high temperature exhaust
system with oxidation catalyst; (3) threeway catalyst with feedback car-
buretor; and (4) threeway plus oxidation catalyst with modulate air in-
jection and feedback fuel injection.  From tests of these systems the
following conclusions were drawn:

     1.   Modulating the air injected into an oxidation catalyst can  result
          in low sulfate emissions at the expense of some increase in CO
          emissions.  When compared with standard air injection systems,
          air modulation reduced sulfates from all three versions of  air
          modulation systems tested.  The reductions were 98 percent  for
          the Chevrolet Impala , 62 percent for the Chevrolet Nova, and
          99+ percent for the Volvo.

     2.   Increasing the temperature of exhaust gases reduced sulfate
          emissions from oxidation catalysts.  An increase of 75°C (134°F)
          in exhaust temperature at the exhaust manifold discharge during
          the CFDS test reduced sulfate emissions 37 percent with the
          system tested on a 1975 Chevrolet Nova with 5. 74 litre (350  CID)
          engine.

     3.   Threeway catalyst systems have low sulfate emissions.  However,
          while the two threeway systems tested could be made to meet either
          the 1981 CO or 1981 NOX standard, neither system could meet both
          standards at the same time.

B.   Durability

     The sulfate emissions remained within the project goal for all systems
during durability testing.  However, none of the three systems tested for
durability were able to maintain all gaseous emissions within the 1981
standards.  Examination of the durability test results produced the following
conclusions.
                                    Ill

-------
     1.    It is possible to maintain low sulfate emissions for 80,500 km
          (50,000 miles)  with any of the three systems tested (oxidation
          catalyst with modulated air injection, threeway catalyst,  and
          threeway plus oxidation catalyst with modulated air injection).

     2.    The fuel injected, threeway plus oxidation catalyst with modulated
          air injection proved the most durable, maintaining all emissions
          within the project goals for 56,350 km (35,000 miles).

C.   General

     The project demonstrated several means of obtaining low sulfate emis-
sions from emission control systems designed for the 1981 gaseous emission
standards.   The most promising system tested was a threeway catalyst (5:1,
Pt:Rh)  plus an oxidation catalyst with modulated air injection which was
tested for 64,400 km (40,000 miles).   Thus,  the project fulfilled its ob-
jective of demonstrating the effectiveness and durability of low sulfate
emission control systems for 1981 and beyond.
                                    112

-------
                                 REFERENCES

 1.   Gentel,  J.  E.,  Manary, O. J. ,  and Valenta, J. C., "Characterization
     of Particulates and Other Nonregulated Emissions from Mobile Sources
     and the  Effect of Exhaust Emissions Control Devices on These Emis-
     sions."   EPA OAWP Publication APTD-1567, March, 1973.

 2.   Bradow,  R.  L.,  Carpenter, D. A., et al., "Sulfate Emissions from
     Catalyst and Non-Catalyst Equipped Automobiles." SAE Paper 740528,
     October, 1974.

 3.   Moran, J. B., "Issue Paper:  Estimated Public Health Impact as a
     Result of Equipping Light-Duty Motor Vehicles with Oxidation
     Catalysts."  EPA, January 31,  1975.

 4.   Bradow,  R.  L. and Moran, J. B.,  "Sulfate Emissions from Catalyst Cars:
     A Review."   SAE Paper 750090;  February, 1975.

 5.   Somers,  J.  H. ,  Garbe, R., Fett,  C. E., and Baines, T. M.,  "Automotive
     Sulfate  Emissions, A Baseline Study."  Presented at the American
     Chemical Society Meeting, San Francisco, California, August, 1976.

 6.   OMSAPC Advisory Circular No. 76, "Compliance With the Requirements of
     Sections 202(a)(4) and 206(a)(3) of the Clean Air Act."   U. S.
     Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air and Waste Management,
     June 28, 1978.

 7.   Ingalls, M. N.  and Springer, K.  J., "Measurement of Sulfate and Sulfur
     Dioxide  in Automotive Exhaust."   EPA Report No. EPA-460/3-76-015,
     August 1976.

 8.   Dietzmann,  H. E., "Protocol to Characterize Gaseous Emissions as a
     Function of Fuel and Additives Composition."  Final Report EPA-600/2-
     75-048,  September 1975.

 9.   Springer, K. J. and Stahman, R.  C., "Diesel Car Emissions - Emphasis
     on Particulate and Sulfate."  SAE Paper 770254, presented at SAE
     Automotive Engineering Congress, Detroit, February 1977.

10.   Ingalls, M. N., "Sulfate Sampling Dilution Tunnel Design and Validation."
     Final Report to EPA under Task 6 of Task Contract 68-03-2196, June 1977.

11.   Irish, D. C. and Stefan, R. J.,  "Vehicle Sulfuric Acid Level Character-
     ization."  SAE Paper 760037 presented at SAE Automotive Engineering
     Congress, Detroit, February 1976.

12.   Bradow,  R.  L.,  Carpenter, D. A., Klosterman, D., Black, F. M., and
     Tejada,  S., "Sulfate Emissions from Catalyst and Non-Catalyst Cars."
     SAE Paper No. 740528, October 1974.
                                     113

-------
13.   Black,  F-  M.,  High,  L.  E.,  and Sigsby, J.  E. "Methodology for Assignment
     of a Hydrocarbon Photochemical Reactivity Index for Emissions from
     Mobile  Sources".  EPA-650/2-75-025,  1975.

14.   Black,  F-  M.,  High,  L.  E.,  and Sigsby, J.  E.  "A Gas Chromatographic
     Method for Direct Analysis  of Photochemically Nonreactive Hydro-
     carbons".  J.  of Chromatographic Science,  Vol. 14, pp. 257, 1976.

15.   Black,  F.  M.  and High,  L.  E. "Effect of Fuel Composition on the Flame
     lonization Detection of Hydrocarbons". J.  Environ. Sci.  Health,
     All (4 & 5),  pp. 331-339,  1976.

16.   Schachmann, H. P. and Laidlee, K.  J.,  "Nitrogen Compounds Other than
     NO in Automobile Exhaust Gas."  J.  of Air Pollution Control Assn.,
     Vol. 22, No.  1, pp.  52, January 1972.

17.   Dietzmann, H.  E. et al., "Analytical Procedures for Characterizing
     Unregulated Pollutant Emissions from Motor Vehicles."  EPA-600/2-
     79-017.  Interim report for Contract 68-02-2497, February 1979.

18.   Zweidinger, R. B., Tejada,  S. B.,  Sigsby  Jr., J. B., and Bradow, R. L.,
     "The Application of Ion Chromatography to the Analysis of Ammonia and
     Alkyl Amines in Automotive  Exhaust."  Symposium on Ion Chromatographic
     Analysis of Environmental Pollutants,  EPA, Research Triangle Park,
     N.C., April 1977.

19.   Draft Final Report for Contract 68-03-2161, Gould Corp., undated.

20.   Beltzer, M.,  Campion, R. J., Harlan, J. and Hochhauser,  A. M.,  "The
     Conversion of S02 Over Automotive  Oxidation Catalyst."  SAE Paper
     750095, February 1975.

21.   Mikkor, M., Hammerle, R. H., Truex, T., "Effects of Hydrocarbons,
     Carbon Monoxide and Oxygen  on Sulfuric Acid Emissions from an
     Automobile Catalyst."  Paper No. 43, presented at the Symposium on
     Auto Emission Catalyst, American Chemical Society 170th Annual Meeting,
     August 27, 1975.

22.   Cohn,  J. G.,  Mannion, W. A., Thompson, C.  E., and Hansel, J. G.,
     "Effect of Three Way Conversion Catalyst  Operation on the Chemical
     State of Automotive Sulfur  Emissions."  SAE Paper 750096, February
     1975.

23.   Springer,  K.  J. and Tyree,  C. D.,  "Exhaust Emissions from Gasoline-
     Powered Vehicles Above 6,000-lb Gross Vehicle Weight."  Final Report
     to the Environmental Protection Agency under Contract EHS 70-110  ,
     April 1972.

24.   Poznick, D. J., and Siewert, R. M., "Continuous Secondary Air Modulation -
     Its Effect on Thermal Manifold Reactor Performance."  SAE Paper 730493,
     May 1973.
                                     114

-------
25.  Hammerle, R. H. and Middor, M.,  "Some Phenomena Which Control Sulfuric
     Acid Emission from Automotive Catalysts."  SAE Paper 750097, February
     1975.

26.  Rush, J. H., "Exhaust Port Heat Rejection in a Piston Engine - A
     Preliminary Report."  SAE Paper 760766, October 1976.

27-  Urban,  C. M. ,  "Regulated and Unregulated Exhaust Emissions from Malfunctioning
     Non-Catlyst and Oxidation Catalyst Gasoline Automobiles," Draft Final Report
     to the Environmental Protection Agency under Contract No. 68-03-2499, April
     1979.

28.  Krause, B., Boufford, R. A.,  Karmilovich, T., and Kayle, E. L., "Cri-
     tical Factors Affecting Automotive Sulfate Emissions," SAE Paper 760091,
     February 1976.

29.  Hummel, J. A., "Changes in Automotive Sulfate Emissions with Extended
     Mileage."  U.S. EPA, Emission Control Technology Division, Ann Arbor,
     Michigan.  CAB-2/ASE-FY79-1, January 1979.

30.  Engh, G. T., and Wallman, S., "Development of the Volvo Lambda-Sond System,"
     SAE Paper 770295, February. 1977.

31.  Field,  Randall, Emission Control Technology Division, Environmental Pro-
     tection Agency, Ann Arbor, MI.  Telephone conversation with Melvin Ingalls,
     Southwest Research Insittute, San Antonio, Texas, May 26, 1978.
                                      115

-------
      APPENDIX A

 Worksheets for Sulfate
Control System Evaluation

-------
System
   Sulfate Control Durability Demonstration
        Control System Evaluation Sheet

Air Modulation
Evaluation Item Score
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.

Meets gaseous
emission goals 5
Sulfate emissions 10
Fuel economy 5
Durability 5
Cost 10
TOTAL SCORE
Weighting Weighted Max. Possible
Factor Score Weighted Score
2.0 10 (20)
1.5 15 (15)
1.5 7.5 d5)
1.0 5 dO)
1.0 10 (10)
47.5 (70)
Item

1.  Meets gaseous
    emission goals
2.  Sulfate emissions
3.  Fuel economy
4.  Durability
                         Scoring Criteria
                  (a)   If HC, CO, NOX below 0.25, 2.11 and 0.93 g/km
                       respectively, score = 10.
                  (b)   If only one of the gaseous emissions is over
                       the goal and it does not exceed the goal by
                       more than 50%, score = 5.
                  (c)   If more than one of the gaseous emissions
                       is over the goal, score = 0.

                  (a)   If 3.1 mg/km or less on SET test score = 10.
                  (b)   If greater than 6.2 mg/km, score = 0.
                  (c)   Between 3.1 and 6.2 mg/km, score = 20 - (3.226 x
                       Sulfate emissions, mg/km)

                  (a)   If fuel economy improved by more than 5%
                       score = 10.
                  (b)   If fuel economy +5%, score = 5.
                  (c)   If fuel economy decreased by more than
                       5%, score = 0.

                  (a)   Estimate life of system without repairs or
                       replacement (only addition parts added for
                       sulfate control - not total system)
                  (b)   Score = Miles
                                     X 10
5.  Cost
                  (a)   This is a relative evaluation - least cost
                       system score = 10.
                            (b)  For other systems:
                                 score = least cost
                                         system cost
                                                     x 10
                                   A-2

-------
    System:  Air Modulation


1.  Gaseous Emissions (FTP) g/km


                                 HC        CO       N°x
    Air Modulation System       0.31      2.44      1.42
      Baseline                  0.33      1.15      1.84
    Percent Difference          6.1     112.2      22.8
     '75 Nova Baseline          0.19      1.24      0.86
      Estimated w/air mod.      0.18      2.63      0.66
          Goals                 0.25      2.11      0.93
    Percent Difference        -28.0%    +24.6%     29.0%

    Score = 5

2.  Sulfate Emissions (SET) mg/km
    Air Modulation System:      0.57 mg/km
    Goal:                       3.11 mg/km

    Score = 10

3.  Fuel Consumption           	&/100 km	
                                FTP       FET    Composite
    Air Modulation System      18.55     14.03     16.52
      Baseline                 17.54     13.36     15.66

    Percent Change             +5.76     +5.02     +5.4

    Score = 5

4.  Durability

    It is estimated that system will require some maintenance in 80,000 km
    (50,000 miles).  To be on conservative side assume system will need to
    be replaced at 40,000 km (25,000 miles)

    Score = 25'000 x 10 = 5
            50,000

5.  Cost

    a.)   From other studies of automotive spare parts cost:
                   retail = 1.667 * wholesale

    b.)   Industrial discounts are approximately the same.  For example
         Swagelok gives 30% discount on 10,000 or more.
                                     A-3

-------
c.)   Assume manufacturer makes 15 profit on wholesale price.

d.)   Assume that the air modulation valve can be combined with the
     present air pump diverter valve and that the vacuum switch can
     be combined with the EGR vacuum switch.  Assume that these
     combinations result in a 50 percent increase in the price of
     the part.

e.)   Cost of Air Modulation System:
     Mod. Valve

     Vac Switch

     Clutch
Retail
8.00
5.60
16.00
Wholesale
5.07
3.57
10.00 (with
Mfgr.
Cost
4.41
3.10
8.70
Total Additional
Cost to Mfgr.
2.21
1.55
8.70
                              modification)
                                                          $12.46
     or as a very conservative estimate this system should cost the
     mfgr. less that $13.00

f.)   This is the least cost system therefore score = 10.
                               A-4

-------
             Sulfate Control Durability Demonstration
                  Control System Evaluation  Sheet
System     High  Temperature  Exhaust
Weighting Weighted
Evaluation Item Score Factor Score
1. Meets gaseous
emission goals 10 2.0 20
2. Sulfate emissions 0 1.5 0
3. Fuel economy 5 1.5 7.5
4. Durability 10 1.0 10
5. Cost 3.3 1.0 3.3
TOTAL SCORE , 	 40.8
Scoring Criteria
Item
Max Possible
Weighted Score
(20)
(15)
(15)
(10)
(10)
(70)


1.  Meets  gaseous
    emission  goals
 2.   Sulfate  emissions
 3.  Fuel  economy
 4.   Durability
(a)   If HC,  CO,  NOX below 0.25,  2.11  and 0.93  g/km
     respectively,  score  = 10.
(b)   If only one of the gaseous  emissions is over
     the goal and it does not exceed  the goal  by
     more than 50%, score = 5.
(c)   If more than one of  the gaseous  emissions
     is over the goal,  score = 0.

(a)   If 3.1 mg/km or less on SET test score =  10.
(b)   If greater than 6.2  mgAm,  score = 0.
(c)   Between 3.1 and 6.2  mg/km,  score = 20 -  (3.226 x
     Sulfate emissions, mg/km)

(a)   If fuel economy improved by more than 5%
     score = 10.
(b)   If fuel economy +5%, score  = 5.
(c)   If fuel economy decreased by more than
     5%, score = 0.

(a)   Estimate life of system without  repairs  or
     replacement (only addition  parts added for
     sulfate control - not total system)
(b)   Score = Miles
                                          50000
                                                x 10
 5.  Cost
(a)   This is a relative evaluation - least cost
     system score = 10.
                             (b)   For other systems:
                                  score = least cost
                                          system cost
                                                      x 10
                                   A-5

-------
Gaseous Emissions  (FTP)
                                      g/km
HC
0.19
0.16
0.25
-36.0%
CO
1.24
2.05
2.11
-2.8%
NOX
0.86
0.86
0.93
-7.5%
                             6.30 mg/km
                             3 .11 mg Am
                                 +103%
                                     &/100 km
     Baseline
     w/port liners

       Goals
Percent Difference

Score = 10

Sulfate Emission (SET)

     w/port liners
     Goal
Percent Difference

Score = 0

Fuel Economy

     Baseline
     High Temp System

Percent Change

Score = 5

Durability
There is no reason why properly designed portliners  and manifolds
should not last 50,000 miles.  Therefore score = 10.

The cost of portliners and high temperature manifolds in quantity
is unknown.  However they are estimated to cost 3 times as much as
the air modulation system.

Score = 1/3 x 10 = 3.3
                             FTP

                            17.39
                            18.19

                            +4.6%
 FET

12.71
13.15

+3.5%
Composite

  15.28
  15.92

   4.2%
                               A-6

-------
           APPENDIX B

       COMPUTER PRINTOUTS
               FOR
AIR MODULATION SYSTEM  DEVELOPMENT
TESTS ON A 1976 CHEVROLET IMPALA
  (Tests in Chronological Order)

-------
                             T A b I. E
UNIT 'JO.              TEST  HO.  1
VEHICLE MiipF L  CHFVROLET  1MPALA

BAOfiMMFR 73S.81*  MM  OF  HG.
O*Y BULB TEMP.    ?s.o  DEC.  c
REL. HUMIDITY      b3  PCT.

EXHAUST EMISSIONS
              VEHICLE EMISSION  RESULTS
      197S  LIGHT DUTY  EMISSIONS  TEST
OATE  3/17/77                      MF-GR.  COOF
FN(,INE   5.7H LITRE  8              CURB Wf.
                                                                                        -II
                                                                                        n  Kb
CO
M
HLOWER DIF. PRESS., P?, hho.f MM
RAG
RAG
RESULTS
NO.


BLOWEH REVOLUTIONS
HC
HC
HC
HC
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO?
CO?
CO?
CO?
NOX
NOX
NOX
NOX
so?
so?
so?
so?
HC
CO
CO?
NOX
so?
HC
CO
CO?
NOX
so?
SAMPLE METER
SAMPLE PPM
BACKGRD METER
BACKGKO PPM
SAMPLE METER
SAMPLE PPM
BACKGRD METER
BACKGRD PPM
SAMPLE METER
READING/SCALE

HEADING/SCALE

RFADING/SCALE

READING/SCALE

READING/SCALE
SAMPLE PERCENT
RACKRRD MFTER
RE AOING/SCALE
BACKGRO PERCENT
SAMPLE METER
SAMPLE PPM
BACKGRD METER
BACKGRO PPM
SAMPLE METER
SAMPLE PPM
HACKRRD METER
BACKGRD PPM
CONCENTRATION
CONCENTRATION
CONCENTRATION
CONCENTRATION
CONCENTHAT ION
MASS GRAMS
MASS GRAMS
MASS GRAMS
MASS GRAMS
MASS GRAMS
READING/SCALE

READING/SCALE

READING/SCALE

READING/SCALE

PPM
PPM
PCT
PPM
PPM





                                      H?0
                                                  1
                                               tOb?U
                                                ?0.3/3
                                                 1.1/3
                                                  1 1
                                                53.7/3
                                                1333
                                                 1.7/2
                                                 .Ob
                                                Ib.O/S
                                                  .8
                                                -o.n/*
                                                -n.o
                                                -o.o/*
                                                -o.o
                                                15.3
                                                 0.0
                                                8.H9
                                              11U.85
                                             ?bb?.83
                                               I1*. 17
                                                U.OO
  WEIGHTED  MASS  HC
  WEIGHTED  MASS  CO
  WEIGHTED  MASS  CO?
  WEIGHTED  MASS  NOX
  WEIGHTED  MASS  so?
                            i.?n  GRAMS/KILOMETRE
                           10.8*  GHAMS/KILOMETRE
                          fsb.51  GHAMS/KILOMETRE
                            ?.03  GRAMS/KILOMETRE
                            u.on  GRAMS/KILOMETRE
                                                                    38.
                                                                      39
                                                                     1.1/3
                                                                      11
                                                                    78. 3/*
                                                                     351
                                                                     HFI BULB  TEMP   ?U.O  DtG.  C
                                                                      AHS. HUMIDITY   13.n (,RAMS/KG
                                                                        BLOWER INLET PRESS.,  Gl  bbO.H  MM.  H?0
                                                                        6LUWER INLET TEMP.    t3  DEG.  c
                                             3
                                          IDbHI
                                           35.3/1
                                            353
                                           10.
                                             10
                                                                    7?.U/3
                                                                    1.30
                                                                     1.1/P
                                                                     .U7
                                                                    38. •»
                                                                     1.0/3
                                                                     l.n
                                                                    -o.o/*
                                                                    -0.0
                                                                    -o.o/*
                                                                    -0.0
                                                                     33?
                                                                    1.2H
                                                                    37.5
                                                                     0.0
                                                                    2.19
                                                                   SO.H8
                                                                 R188.3S
                                                                   10.13
                                                                    0.00
CARBON NALANCE  FUEL  CONSUMPTION = 50.31*  LITRES  PER HUNDRED KILOMETRES
TOTAL CVS  FLOW  =    ?f»?.S 3TD. CU. METRES
                                            b8b
                                             ,5/*
                                              1
                                           9H.b/3
                                           1.77
                                            3.7/3
                                            .Ob
                                           89. >»
                                             .H/3
                                             .8
                                           -O.O/*
                                           -0.0
                                           -O.O/*
                                           -0.0
                                            bf 8
                                           1.73
                                           88.7
                                            0.0
                                          15.09
                                          57.37
                                          13. If
                                           0.00

-------
              TABLE
 I
U)
                           EXHAUST  EMISSIONS  FROM  SINGLE  BAG  SAMPLE
                                 VEHICLE.  NUMBER
      DATE  3/17/77
      MODEL  117b CHtVY  IMPALA
      DRIVER   SR
      WET BULB TEMP   18  C
      SPEC. HUM.  10. (l GRAM/KG
                    TIME    -d HRS.
                    SET-?
                    TEST WT.  S177 KG.
                    DRY BULH TEMP  35 C
                    UARO.  735.3 MM  HG.
                                                  TEST NO.  S
                                                  ENGINE 5.7 LITREV fl
                                                  GVW    0 KG
                                                  REL. HUM.  fS.3 PCT
                                                  MEASURED FUEL  (1.00 KG
        RUN DURATION
        BLOWER  INLET PRESS.
        BLOWER  DIP.  PRESS.
        BLOWER  INLET TEMP.
        DYNO REVOLUTIONS
        BLOWER  REVOLUTIONS
        BLOWER  CU. CM /REV.
                23. 2S MINUTES
               bhU.4  MM. H30
               hbO.f  MM  H30
                  t3  DEG. C
                1123H5
        BAG RESULTS
         HC  SAMPLE
         HC  SAMPLE
         HC
         HC
         CO
         CO
         CO
         CO
        METER READING/SCALE
        PPM
BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
BACKGHD PPM
SAMPLE
SAMPLE
               METER READING/SCALE
               PPM
       BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
       BACKGRD PPM
   COS SAMPLE  METER READING/SCALE
   COS SAMPLE  PERCENT
   COS BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
   COS BACKGRD PERCENT
   NOX SAMPLE  METER READING/SCALE
   NOX SAMPLE  PPM
   NOX BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
   NOX BACKGRD PPM
   HC  CONCENTRATION PPM
   CO  CONCENTRATION PPM
   COS CONCENTRATION PCT
   NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
   SOS COCENTRATION PPM
   HC  MASS (GRAMS)
   CO  MASS (GRAMS)
   COS MASS (GRAMS)
   NOX MASS (GRAMS)
   SOS MASS (GRAMS)

HC  GRAMS/KILoMETRE      .11
CO  GRAMS/KILOMETRE     5.5S
CO? GRAMS/KILOMETRE   3HS
NOX GRAMS/KILOMETRE     1.81
sos GRAMS/KILOMETRE     o.oo
   43.1/3
     •*3
    S.b/S
     10
   S3.3/3
    537
     .3/3
      b
   15.3/5
   S.OS
    1.7/2
    .Ob
   35.5/3
  lOb.5
     .3/3
     .1
     35
    503
   1.9b
  105.7
   O.I)
   t.St
 ISS.II
75Sl.bO
  HI.57
   0.00
      HC  GRAMS/KG  OF FUEL    1.72
      CO  GRAMS/KG  OF FUEL    5U.n
      CO? GRAMS/KG  OF FUEL    3085
      NOX GRAMS/KG  OF FUEL   lb.90
      S02 GRAMS/KG  OF FUEL    n.OO
                         HC  GRAMS/MIN    .18
                         CO  GRAMS/MlN    5.3
                         C03 GRAMS/MIN    32b
                         NOX GRAMS/MIN   1.78
                         502 GRAMS/MIN   D . Oil
      CARBON BALANCE  FUEL  ECONOMY  =    15.2?  LITRES  PER  HUNDRED  KILOMETERS

-------
           TABLE
                         EXHAUST  F.MISSIMNS FROM SINGLE BAG SAMPLE
                               VEHICLE  NUMBFK
    DATE  3/17/77               TIME.     -n HRS.         TEST NO.  2
    MODEL  197S, CHEVY  IMPALA    SF.T-7                  ENGINE 5.7 LITREO
    RUN DURATION    23.29  MIN.   DISTANCE DRIVEN   52.01 KILOMETRES
    CVS BLUHFH  TEST  VOL.   ?S1.13  ACT.  CU. METRES
                                SAMPLE
    SULFATE DATA                	
                        BACKGROUND
EJ
I
 FILTER NO.
 SAMPLE VOL. CU. FT.         18.50
 SAMPLE TEMP. DEG. F            H5
 SAMPLE AREA SO. IN.      2R2R3.00
 DILUTION FACTOR                 J
 STAND. OEN. MICROG/ML        5.On
 STAND. AKEA su. IN.    pjqsh^.nn
 Sfl>»,MlCROG/FILTF.H           b.tH7

SULFUR DIOXIDE DATA

 SAMPLE VOL. CU. FT.          1.00
 SAMPLE TEMP. DEG. F            70
 AREA,BUBBLER i               o.oo
 DIL. FACT.,BUBBLER 1            1
 AREA,BUBBLER 2               0.00
 DIL. FACT.,BUBBLER 2            1
 STAND. OFN. MICROG/ML        5.00
 STAND. AKEA,SO. IN.          1.00
 so2, MILLIG/BUBBLER i       n.ooo
 soe, MIILIG/BUBBLER 3       o.ono
 sn?, PPM                      o.o

SULFATE AND S02 EMISSIONS
                                                           1 .00
                                                             7fl
                                                           n.no
                                                              1
                                                           s.nn
                                                           i.oo
                                                          0.000
                             1 .00
                               70
                             n.no
                                1
                             n.oo
                                l
                             5.no
                             l.oo
                            0.000
                            o.oon
                              o.o
     NFT SULFATE,MILLIGRAM/TEST             S.tbl
     NET H230H,MILLIGRAM/TEST               3.533
     NET 302,GRAM/TEST                      o.ooo
     NFT SULFATE,MILLIGRAM/KILOMETRE         .157
     NET H2SOH,MILLIGRAM/KILOMETRE           .Ibl
     NET 302,GRAM/KILOMETRE                 0.000
    SULFUR BALANCE
     FUEL WT., 2*bl GRAMS
               SULFUR,GRAMS
               PCT. RECOVERY
SULFUR IN FUEL, .0311) PCT.
 FUEL      S02       H2SOH
  .7b
          n.nnn
           o.on
                                                .0012
                                                  .15
302 + H2SO-*

    .OU12
      .15

-------
 UNIT NO.     7
 VEHICLE  MODEL
    TEST NO.
CHEVY IMPALA
 BAROMETER  7t0.92  MM  OF HG.
 DRY BULB TEMP.    25.h  DEC.  C
 REL.  HUMIDITY      28  PCT.
 TABLE                    VEHICLE EMISSION RESULTS
                 1975  LIGHT DUTY EMISSIONS TEST
«           DATE  3/3(1/77                     MFGR. CODE   -0
           ENGINE   5.7t LITRE R             CURB WT.     0 KG

                                        WET BULB TEMP  It.4 DEG.  C
                                         AB3. HUMIDITY   5.R GRAMS/KG
YR.
GVM
197b
   0 KG
 F.XHAUST  EMISSIONS

       BLOWER  DIF. PRESS.,
       BAG RESULTS
W
          G2, B85.8 MM. H20
BAG NO.
RLOWER REVOLUTIONS
HC SAMPLE METER READING/SCALE
HC SAMPLE PPM
HC BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
HC BACKGRD PPM
CO SAMPLE METER READING/SCALE
CO SAMPLE PPM
CO BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
CO 8ACKGRD PPM
C02 SAMPLE METER READING/SCALE
C02 SAMPLE PERCENT
C02 BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
C02 BACKGRD PERCENT
NOX SAMPLE METER READING/SCALE
NOX SAMPLE PPM
NOX BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
NOX BACKGRD PPM
502 SAMPLE METER READING/SCALE
S02 SAMPLE PPM
S02 BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
S02 BACKGRD PPM
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
CO? CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
S02 CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
1
H05H7
31. 5/ 3
315
.9/ 3
9
77.0/11
3H2
.8/11
2
t9.5/ 2
2.25
l.b/ 2
.Ob
50. 5/ 3
151.5
.5/ 3
1.5
-0.0/-0
-0.0
-0.0/-0
-0.0
308
3?3
2.21
150.3
0.0
13.50
28. bO
C02 MASS GRAMS 3088.92
NOX MASS GRAMS
802 MASS GRAMS
WEIGHTED MASS HC l.l* GRAMS/KILOMETRE
WEIGHTED MASS CO 1.95 GRAMS/KILOMETRE
WEIGHTED MASS C02 501.39 GRAMS/KILOMETRE
WEIGHTED MASS NOX 3.02 GRAMS/KILOMETRE
WEIGHTED MASS S02 0.00 GRAMS/KILOMETRE
18.82
0.00





                                        BLOWER INLET PRESS., Gl  bBS.8  MM.  H20
                                        BLOWER INLET TEMP.   t3  DEG. C
                                                      2
                                                   b9b87
                                                    55. 7/ 2
                                                      Sb
                                                     i.n/ 3
                                                      10
                                                    21.3/13
                                                      27
                                                      .b/U
                                                       2
                                                    35. 8/ 2
                                                    1.38
                                                     1.3/ 3
                                                     .05
                                                    28. 7/ 3
                                                    8b.l
                                                      .S/ 3
                                                     1.5
                                                    -0.0/-0
                                                    -0.0
                                                    -0.0/-0
                                                    -0.0
                                                                       25
                                                                     1.3t
                                                                     8*. 8
                                                                      0.0
                                                                     3.53
                                                                     3.78
                                                                  3213.10
                                                                    1B.21*
                                                                     0.00
                                                       3
                                                    "»0b29
                                                     18.2/ 3
                                                      182
                                                      b.3/ 2
                                                        b
                                                     b9.2/12
                                                      15?
                                                      l.t/13
                                                        1
                                                     t3.S/ 2
                                                     1.12
                                                      1.2/ 2
                                                      .OH
                                                     H7.3/ 3
                                                    1H1.1
                                                       .t/ 3
                                                      1.2
                                                     -0.0/-0
                                                     -0.0
                                                     -0.0/-0
                                                     -0.0

                                                      177
                                                      1H8
                                                     1.89
                                                    IfO.q
                                                      0.0
                                                     7.77
                                                    13.18
                                                  2bf7.73
                                                    17.b8
                                                     0.00
     CARBON  BALANCE FUEL CONSUMPTION = ?l.bS LITRES PER HUNDRED KILOMETRES
     TOTAL CVS FLOW =   283.3 STD. CU. METRES

-------
            r A H L F
                          FXHAUIU  EMISSIONS  FROM SINGLE BAG  SAMPLE
                                 VFMICLt NUMBER
     t> A T f   j / 3 0 / 7 7
     MODEL  1^7^  CHtVY  1MPM.A
     DRTVfP   S H
     WET  Rill.H f F: M P   Ib  C
     SPFC. HUM.   b.S  GRAM/KG
       RUN DURATION
       HLOWFK) INLFT  PRESS.
       RLflWuh1 OIF.   P*FSS.
       RLOHFR INLFT  TEMP.
       OYNO Rf VOLUTIONS
       RLO*F_* REVOLUTIONS
       HLCMFR CU.  CM /REV.
                              TIME     -0 HNS.
                              SET  7
                              TEST  W T.   2177  KG.
                              ORY  8ULH  TEMP   ??  C
                              tfAHU.   7HD.9 MM   HG.
                              TEST  NO.   2
                              ENGINE  5.7 LITRE   8
                              GVW     0  KG
                              REL.  HUM.   ?q.<» PCT
                              MEASURED  FUEL  0.00  KG
                         ?3.?7  MINUTES
                        7b?.(l   MM.  H?0
                        7(,?.fl   MM   H?0
                           •*t   DEC.  C
                        31ROR
                         1 1 ? 0 8 ?
03
I
RAT, RESULTS
HC
HC
HC
HC
CO
Cu
CO
CO
CO?
CO?
Co?
CO?
NOX
NOX
NOX
NOX
HC
co
CO?
NOX
so?
HC
CO
CO?
NOX
SO?
SAMPLE METER
SAMPLE PPM
HACKGHD METER
H A C K G FO) PPM
S A M P L K METER
SAMPLE PPM
DACKGRI) MF TEW
HACKGRO PPM
SAKPLE METER
RFAOING/SCALE

READING/SCALE

READING/SCALE

READING/SCALE

READING/SCALE
SAMPLE PERCENT
RACM;RD METER
READING/SCALE
HACKGKU PERCENT
SAMPLE METER
SAKPLE PPM
BACKGRD METER
HACKGRD PPM
CONCENTRATION
CONCENTRAT ION
CONCENTRATION
CONCENTRATION
COCENTRATION
MASS (GRAMS)
MASS (GRAMS)
MASS (GRAMS)
MASS (GRAMS)
MASS (GRAMS)
READING/SCALE

READING/SCALE

PPM
PPI1
PCT
PPM
PPM





         GRAnS/KlLOMKTRE
             >.75
                                                    58. 2b
                                                     n.no
HC
CO
CO?
NOX
so?
GRAMS/KG
GRAMS/ KG
GRAMS/M;
GRAM^/KG
G R A n n / " '".
OF
OF
OF
OF
OF
FUEL
FUEL
FUEL
FUEL
FUFL
H .h^
?7.B
3111
? ) . hh
11 . no
            t< A L * N C t"  F 1C f (.  tCl'-li
                                       HC  GRAMS/MIN     .SH
                                       CO  GRAMS/MlN     3.5
                                       cog GRAMS/MIN     aho
                                       NOX GRAMS/MIN    ?.5n
                                       so? GRAMS/MIN    o.nn
                                       Ib.bi LITRF3  PER HUNDRED  KILOMETERS

-------
           TABLE         FXHAUST EMISSIONS  FROM SINGLE HAG SAMPLE
                               VEHICLE NUMBER

    DATE  3/10/77               TIME     -0  MRS.        TEST NO.  2
    MODEL  117h CHEVY  IMPALA   SET 7                   ENGINE  -5.7 LlTREO
    RUN DURATION    2=1.27 MIN.  DISTANCE  DRIVEN  21.93 KILOMETRES
    cvs HLUWFH  TEST VOL.  2t4.nb ACT. cu.  METRES
to
I
                            SAMPLE
SUI.FATE DATA                	

 FILTER NO.               t7FH2BflO
 SAMPLE VOL.  CU.  FT.         11.Sh
 SAMPLE TE^P.  DUG.  F            8t
 SAMPLE AREA  SO.  IN.     239570.nil
 DILUTION  FACTOR                  1
 STAND. DEN.  MICROG/ML       5.00
 STAND. AREA  SO.  IN.     202281.00
 SOt,MICKOG/FILTER          S7.hbD

SULFUR DIOXIDE DATA

 SAMPLE VOL.  CU.  FT.          1.00
 SAMPLE TEMP.  DEG.  F            70
 AREA,BIJRRLER  1               0.00
 OIL. FACf.,BUBBLER 1            I
 AREA,HUBBLE.R  P.               0.00
 DIL. FACT.,BUBBLER 2            1
 STAND. DF.N.  MICROG/ML       1.00
 STAND. AREA,SO.  IN.          1.00
 302, MKLIG/BUBBLER  1      0.000
 S02, .-"lILLIG/flUSBLEK  2      n.1100
 SO?, PPM                       0.0
                                                        BACKGROUND
                                                             1.00
                                                               70
                                                             (1.00
                                                                1
                                                             i .no
                                                             l.oo
                                                           o.ooo
                                                             l.oo
                                                               70
                                                             0.00
                                                                1
                                                             0.00
                                                                1
                                                             1.00
                                                             1.00
                                                           0.000
                                                           0.000
                                                              0.0
    SULFATE  AND  SO? EMISSIONS
     NFT  SULFATE,MILLIGRAM/TEST            1»8.t02
     NET  H2SOH,MILLIGRAM/TEST              49.118
     NFT  S'JP,GRAM/TEST                      o.ooo
     NFT  S'JLFATE,MILLIGRAM/KILOMETRE        2.207
     NFT  H^Sni,MILLIGRAM/KTLOMETRE          2.253
     NFT  S'Jg,r,RAM/KILOMETRK                 0.0(10
    SULFUR  BALANCE
     FUEL ^T.,  2b89 GRAMS
                SULFUR,GRAMS
                PCT. RECOVERY
                           SULFUR  IN  FUEL,  .0320 PCT.
                            FUEL       S02       H2SOH
                                  .8b
                                      0.000
                                       0.00
.Olb2
 1.R8
302 t H2SOH

    .Olb2
     1.88

-------
                                TABLE
UNIT Ml.    7
VEHIClE MOOFL
      TEST MO.
CHEVY IMPALA
BAROMTTFR 7tn.9? MM OF HG.
DRY BULH TEMP.   2?.? OEG. C
REL. HUMIDITY     S3 PCT.

EXHAUST EMISSIONS

     BLOWER OIF. PRESS., G?,  711.2  MM.
     RAG RESULTS
     RAG NO.
     BLOWER RFVULUTIONS
              VEHICLE EMISSION RESULTS
      1975  LIGHT DUTY EMISSIONS TEST
DATE  H/ 1/77                     MFGR. CODE    -0
ENGINE   5.71 LITRE a             CURB HT.      o KG

                             HET BULB TEMP   Ifa.l OEG.  C
                              ABS. HUMIDITY    9.1  GRAMS/KG
                            YR.
                            GVM
197b
   0 KG
                        H20
HC
HC
HC
HC
ro
CO
CO
CO
ro?
ro?
C02
C02
NUX
NOX
® NOX
CO NOX
SO?
S02
SO?
SO?
HC
ro
CO?
NOX
sn?
HC
CO
ro?
MOX
S02
SAMPLE MFTEH READING/SCALE
SAMPLE PPM
HACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
BACKGWD PPM
SAKPLK METER READING/SCALE
SAMPLE PPM
RACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
BACKGRD PPM
SAMPLE METER READING/SCALE
SAMPLE PERCENT
BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
BACKGRO PERCENT
SAMPLE METER Rt AD I NG/SCALE
SAMPLE PPM
BACKGHD METER READING/SCALE
BACKGHD PPM
SAMPLE METER READING/SCALE
SAMPLE PPM
RACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
BACKGHD PPM
CONCENTRATION PPM
CONCENTRATION PPM
CONCENTRATION PCT
CONCENTRATION PPM
CONCENTRATION PPM
MASS GRAMS
MASS GRAMS
MASS GRAMS
MASS GRAMS
MASS GRAMS
                                     i
                                  HOM5
                                   3fl.l)/3
                                    300
                                    1.3/3
                                     13
                                   It.?/*
                                    HB1
                                    3.2/*
                                     10
                                   HH .9/2
                                   2.00
                                    1.7/2
                                    .Ob
                                   39.5/3
                                  118.5
                                     -H/3
                                    1.2
                                   -U.O/*
                                   -0.0
                                   -o.n/*
                                   -o.o

                                    289
                                    HHb
                                   1.95
                                  117.5
                                    0.0
                                  12.b7
                                  39.Hb
                               ?721.b9
                                  lb.Pl
                                   0.00
     WEIGHTED MASS HC
     WEIGHTED MASS CO
     WEIGHTED MASS CO?
     WEIGHTED MASS NOX
     WEIGHTED MASS S02
             .93 GRAMS/KILOMETRE
            2.18 GRAMS/KILOMETRE
          f»7.05 GRAMS/KILOMETRE
            2.Hi GRAMS/KILOMETRE
            0.00 GRAMS/KILOMCTRE
                             BLOWER INLET PRESS.,  Gl  711.2  MM.  H20
                             BLOWER INLET TEMP.    H3  DEG.  C
                           2
                        h97Hb
                         H2.b/?
                           •»3
                          1. 1/3
                           11
                                                                    1. ?/*
                                                                      5
                                                                   29.9/2
                                                                   1.2H
                                                                    1.5/2
                                                                    .05
                                                                   57.7/2
                                                                   57.7
                                                                    1.2
                                                                   -O.O/*
                                                                   -0.0
                                                                   -O.O/*
                                                                   -0.0

                                                                     33
                                                                      q
                                                                   1.19
                                                                   Sb.b
                                                                    0.0
                                                                   2.*5
                                                                   1.35
                                                                2851. 3b
                                                                  13. HI
                                                                   U.OO
  H0b35
   13.9/3
    139
    9.7/2
     10
   7H.2/*
    170
    5.3/*
      5
   HO.9/2
   1.79
    2.0/3
    .07
   37.2/3
  lll.b
    1.2/2
    1.2
   -O.O/*
   -0.0
   -O.O/*
   -0.0

    131
    157
   1.72
  110.b
    0.0
   5.73
  13.92
2HOB.9Q
  15.25
   0.00
   CAPRON BALANCE FUEL CONSUMPTION =  19.33  LITRES  PER  HUNDRED KILOMETRES
   TOTAL CVS FUUN =   2B2.H .9 T I). CU.  METRES

-------
           TABLE
                        EXHAUST EMISSIONS  FROM  SINGLE RAG SAMPLE
                              VEHICLE  NUM8FR    7
    DATE   4/  1/77
    MODEL   197h CHEVY IMPALA
    DRIVER   HP
    WET  SULB  TFMP  lh C
    SPFC.  HUM.    q.n GKAM/KG
                    TIME    -tl  HRR.
                    SET-7
                    TEST NT.      n  KG.
                    DRY RULH  TEMP   ?1  C
                    HARD.   737.H  MM   HG.
      RUN DURATION
      BLOWER INLET PRESS.
      BLOWER DIP.  PRESS.
      RtOWER INLET TEMP.
      DYNO REVOLUTIONS
      BLOWER EVOLUTIONS
      BLOWER CU. CM /REV.
                ?3.?e MINUTES
               711.2  MM.  H?0
                      MM   H?0
                   711.2
                       to
                   31 3113
                      OEG.  c
                                                TEST NO.
                                                ENGINE 5.
                                                         7 LITREV B
                                                GVW
                                                REL.
           0 KG
         HUM.
55.1 PCT
                                                       MEASURED FUEL  (I.On KG
CD
I
      BAG RESULTS
       HC  SAMPLE
           SAMPLE
        METER READING/SCALE
        PPM
BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
BACKGRD PPM
SAMPLE
SAMPLE
                   METER READING/SCALE
                   PPM
           RACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
HC
HC
HC
CO
CO
CO
CO  BACKGRD PPM
CO? SAMPLE  METER  READING/SCALE
CO? SAMPLE  PERCENT
CO? BACKGRD METER  READING/SCALE
CO? BACKGRO PERCENT
NOX SAMPLE  METER  READING/SCALE
NOX SAMPLE  PPM
NOX BACKGRD METER  READING/SCALE
NOX BACKGHD PPM
HC  CONCENTRATION  PPM
CO  CONCENTRATION  PPM
CO? CONCENTRATION  PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION  PPM
S02 COCFNTRATION PPM
HC  MASS  (GRAMS)
CO  MASS  (GRAMS)
CO? MASS  (GRAMS)
NOX MASS  (GRAMS)
SO? MASS  (GRAMS)
1.R/3
 SB
1.0/3
 10
                                        530
                                         .b/3
                                         13
                                                  ?.OS
                                        .07
                                       35.3/3
                                      ins.q
                                         .4/3
                                        i.a
                                         10
                                        489
                                                  o.o
                                                 10. 8b
                                                 19. b7
                                                 39.89
                                                  0.00
    HC  GRAMS/KILOMETRE       .50
    CO  GRAMS/KILOMETRE      5.St
    CO? GRAMS/KILOMETRE    357
    HDX GPAMS/KTLOMETRE      l.«5
    SU? r,RAMS/KILOMETRE      n.on

    HC  GRAMS/KG OF FUEL   H.35
    CO  GRAMS/KG OF FUEL   47.9
    CO? GRAMS/KG OF FUFL   3MHC)
    NOX GRAMS/KG OF FUEL   15.91,
    SO? GRAMS/KG OF FUEL   0.110
                          HC   GRAMS/MIN     .47
                          co   GRAMS/MIN     5.1
                          co?  GRAMS/MIN     331
                          NOX  GRAMS/MIN    1.71
                          SO?  GRAMS/MIN    n>0ri
    CARBON BALANCE FUEL ECONO"Y  =    15. 7h  LITRFS PER HUNDRED KILOMETERS

-------
       TAhLI-
                     EXHAUST  FMI.'iSFONS FROM SINGLE HAG SAMPLE
                           V F H I t; L E  NUMBER   7
HAIt  4/ 1/77               1 IMF     -11 HHS.
MODEL.  H7K CHEVr  IMPALA    SET-7
PUN DURATION    P3.PH  MIN.   DISTANCE DRIVEN  ?1.SR
TVS ULUUEh  HST  VOL.   ?4H.H7  ACT.  CU. METRES
                         TEST  NO.   ?
                         ENGINE  5.7 LITREU
                         KILOMETRES
I
M
o
SULFATE OA1A

 FILTER MO.
 SAMPLE VOL. CU. FT.
 SAMPLE TEMP. DEU. f
 SAMPLE AKEA SO. IN.
 DILUTION FACTOR
 STAND. DEN. MICROG/ML
 STAND. AREA SO. IN.
 304 ,MICROt;/FILTER

SULFUR DIOXIDE DATA

 SAMPLE VOL. CU. FT.
 SAMPLE TFMP. DCG. F
 AREA.BUBBLFR i
 OTL.  FACT.,BUBBLER 1
 AREA,BUBBLER ?
 DIL.  FACT.,BUBBLER ?
 STAND. DEN. MICROG/ML
 STAND. AREA,SO. IN.
 SO?,  MILLIG/BUBBLER 1
 SO?,  MILLIG/BURBLER ?
 30?,  PPM
                            SAMPLE
                          t 7-FH-?H03
                             15. 3R
                                7?
                               . n o
                                 1
                            3-». 710
                              l.nn
                                70
                              a. no
                                 I
                              o.oo
                                 l
                              l.no
                              i.oo
                             o.ooo
                             o.ooo
                               o.o
                                                   BACKGROUND
                             1.00
                               70
                             n.no
                                l
                             1 .00
                             1.00
                            Cl.UflO
                             1 iOO
                               70
                             0.00
                                1
                             0.00
                                1
                             l.nn
                             i.on
                            o.oon
                            o.ooo
                              o.o
SULFATE AND SO? EMISSIONS

 NM SULFATE,MILLIGRAM/TEST            ?2.771
 NFT H?so>t,MILLIGRAM/TEST              ?j.asn
 NFT SO?,GRAM/TEST                      0.000
 NET SULFAle .MILLIGRAM/KILOMETRE        l.O«iS
 NET HPS04,MILLIGHAM/KILOMETRE          1.077
 NET s"?.,GRAM/KILOMETRE                 o.oon
SHI FUR BALANCE
 FUEL WT., 5491 GRAMS
           SULFUR,GRAMS
           PCT. RECOVERY
SULFUR IN FUEL, .0310 PCT.
 FUEL      SO?       H?S04
  . 77
          o. n o n
           o.nn
                                                ,no?b
                                                                 SO? + H2S04


                                                                     ,007b
                                                                       .18

-------
                                TABLE
UNIT NU.    7
VEHICLE MODEL
              TEST NO.
          CHEVY IMPALA
              VEHICLE EMISSION RESULTS
      1R7S  LIGHT DUTY EMISSIONS TEST
HATE  H/ b/77                     MFGR. CODE
ENRINE   5.7H LITRE 8             CURB WT.
                       -0
                       0 KG
                           YR.   197b
                           GVM     0  KG
BAROMETER 7H9.55 MM OF HG.
DHY BULB TEMP.   ?U.b DEG. C
REL. HUMIDITY     32 PCT.

EXHAUST EMISSIONS

     BLOWER DIP. PRESS!, 65, 73b.b MM.
     BAG RESULTS
     BAG NO.
     BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
                                  H20
                  METER READING/SCALE
                  PPM
HC   SAMPLE
HC   SAMPLE
HC   BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
HC   BACKGRD PPM
CO   SAMPLE  METER READING/SCALE
CO   SAMPLE  PPM
CO   BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
CO   BACKGRD PPM
CO?  SAMPLE  METER READING/SCALE
CO?  SAMPLE  PERCENT
COS  BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
CO?  BACKGRD PERCENT
NUX  SAMPLE  METER READING/SCALE
NOX  SAMPLE  PPM
NOX  BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
NOX  BACKGRD PPM
SO?  SAMPLE  METER READING/SCALE
SO?  SAMPLE  PPM
SO?  BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
SO?  nACKGRD PPM

HC   CONCENTRATION PPM
CO   CONCENTRATION PPM
CO?  CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX  CONCENTRATION PPM
SO?  CONCENTRATION PPM
HC   MASS GRAMS
CO   MASS GRAMS
CO?  MASS GRAMS
NOX  MASS GRAMS
SO?  MASS GRAMS
          1
       40585
        13.5/ 3
         135
          .b/ 3
           b
        31.7/ 3
         7t9
          .!/ 3
           2
        Ht.3/ ?
        1.97
         1.7/ ?
         .Ob
        H7.3/ 3
       1H1.9
          .b/ 3
         1.8
        -0.0/-0
        -0.0
        -0.0/-0
        -0.0

         130
         711
        1.92
       ItO.t
         0.0
        5.75
       b3.bO
     ?703.88
       17.29
        0.00
     WEIGHTED MASS HC
     WEIGHTED MASS CO
     WEIGHTED MASS CO?
     WEIGHTED MASS NOX
     WEIGHTED MASS SO?
                        .f? GRAMS/KILOMETRE
                      t.3t GRAMS/KILOMETRE
                    452.15 GRAMS/KILOMETRE
                      2.39 GRAMS/KILOMETRE
                      O.OII GRAMS/KILOMETRE
                                                                  WET  BULB  TEMP   11.7  DEG.  C
                                                                  A8S.  HUMIDITY    4.9  GRAMS/KG
                             BLOWER INLET PRESS., Gl 73b.b MM. H?0
                             BLOWER INLET TEMP.   t? OEG. C
   2
b9bot
 35. 8/ 2
   3b
   .e/ 3
    8
 55.1/1?
  lao
   .!/ 3
    2
 71. fl/ 3
 1.30
  i.i/ 2
  .07
 b?.?/ ?
 b?.?
   .5/ 3
  l.S
 -D.O/-0
 -0.0
 -0.0/-0
 -0.0

   ?q
  lit
 l.?t
 bU.8
  0.0
 ?.17
17. t8
                                                                  1?.85
                                                                   n.oo
     3
  f 0595
   ?0.0/ ?
     ?0
    b.O/ 2
      b
   b8.b/12
    155
     .8/12
      1
   89. t/ 3
   l.b?
    •*.3/ 3
    .07
   H0.9/ 3
                                                                                     l.S/  2
                                                                                     1.2
                                                                                    -0.0/-0
                                                                                    -0.0
                                                                                    -0.0/-0
                                                                                    -0.0
     15
    1H7
   l.bl
  121.7
    U.O
    .b5
  13.17
2270. 5b
  1H.99
   0.00
   CARBON BALANCE FUEL CONSUMPTION  =  19.b?  LITRES  PER  HUNDRED  KILOMETRES
   TOTAL CV3 FLOW =   285.3  STD.  CU.  METRES

-------
          T AnlF
                       EXHAUST EMISSIONS FROM  SINGLE  BAG  SAMPLE
                             VEHICLE NUMBER    7
   PATE  t / t / 7 7
   MOOfcL  J17h CHEVY IMPALA
   DRIVER   BP
   WET  8ULH IFMP  12 r
   SPEC. MUM.   S.2 GUAM/KG
     PUN our;A T ION
            INLET PRESS.
            OIF.  PRESS.
     RLo.it-> INLET TEMP.
     OYNO RF VOLUTIONS
     PLUrtfcfV REVOLUTIONS
     HLOWEK Cll.  CM /REV.
     TIME     P. MRS.
     SE 1-7
     TEST WT.     n KG.
     DkY BULB TEMP  21 C
     HARO.  7HS.b MM  HG.
 23.21 MINUTES
73b.h  MM. H20
73h.h  MM  H?0
   •»?  OEG. C
325H7
 1 l?HbS
 2227
                                                 TEST  NO.  -n
                                                 ENGINE  5.7  LITRE   8
                                                 GVW     0  KG
                                                 REL.  HUM.   33.1  PCT
                                                 MEASURED  FUEL   0.00 KG
W
I
BAG RESULTS
 HC  SAMPLE  METER READING/SCALE
 HC  SAMPLE  PPM
 HC  BACKGRD METFR READING/SCALE
 HC  BACK15R0 PPM
 CO  SAMPLE  METER READING/SCALE
 CO  SAMPLE  PPM
 CO  OACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
 CO  BACKGRO PPM
 CO? SAMPLE  METER READING/SCALE
 CO? SAMPLE  PERCENT
 CO? BACKGHO METER READING/SCALE
 CO? BACKGRO PERCENT
 NOX SAMPLE  METER READING/SCALE
 NOX SAMPLE  PPM
 NOX BACKGRO METER READING/SCALE
 NOX RACKGRO PPM
 HC  CONCENTRATION PPM
 CO  CONCENTRATION PPM
 C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
 NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
 302 COCENTRATION PPM
 HC  MASS (GRAMS)
 CO  MASS (GRAMS)
 CO? MASS (GRAMS)
 NOX MASS (GRAMS)
 302 MASS (GRAMS)
                       14.5X?
                         1H
                        b.2/2
                          b
                       bo.rv*
                        133
                         .B/*
                          1
                       HS.1/2
                       2.01
                        2.0/2
                        .07
                       53.8/3
                      Ibl.*
                         .5/3
                        1.5
                          9
                        125
                       1.95
                      lbll.1
                       0.0
                       1.13
                      30.80
                    7513.BO
                      St.11
                       0.00
   HC   GRAMS/KILOMETRE       .os
   CO   GRAMS/KILOMETRE      1.37
   co2  GRAMS/KILOMETRE    338
   NOX  GRAMS/KILOMETRE      2.H»
   SO?  GRAMS/KILOMETRE      0.00

   HC   GPAMS/KR  OF  FUEL     .t7
   CO   GRAMS/KG  OF  FUEL    12.R
   C02  GHAMS/KG  OF  FUEL    31»8
   NOX  GRAMS/KG  OF  FUEL   22.?b
   SO?  GRAMS/KG  OF  FUEL    O.nn
          HC   GRAMS/MIN    .05
          CO   GRAMS/MIN    1.3
          C02  GRAMS/MIN    32b
          NOX  GRAMS/MIN   ?.ab
          302  GRAMS/MIN   0.00
  CARBON r.AL»NCE  FUEL  ECONOMY r   It.S* LITRES PER HUNDRED KILOMETERS

-------
            TABLE
                         EXHAUST EMISSIONS FROM  SINGLE  BAG SAMPLE
                               VEHICLE NUMBER    7
dd
I
    DATE  t/  b/77               TIME     2 HRS.         TEST  NO.  -0
    MODEL   l
-------
U^IT NO.           TFST NO.
VEHlClt  MOOFL  fHFVY IMP&LA

RAROMFTFP MS. |? ww OF HG.
DRY RULP TEMP.   ?^q DFG. C
REL. HUMIDITY     s? PCT.

EXHAUST  F1-
03
I
RLO-FR OIF. PRFSS., G?, 7?3.<» MM.
RAG RESULTS
RAG NO.
       REVOLUTIONS
     SAMPLE  METFR READINGXSCALE
             PPM
             METER READINGXSCALE
     RACKGRP PPM
             METER READINGXSCALE
             PPM
HC
HC
HC
HC
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO?
CO?
CO?
CO?
NOX
NOX
NOX
NOX
so?
so?
so?
so?

HC
CO
CO?
NOX
so?
HC
CO
CO?
NOX
so?
           SAMPLE
SAMPLE
SAMPLF
BACKGRD METER PEADINGXSCALE
8ACKGRO PPM
SAMPLF  METFP RFADINGX3C*LE
SAMPLE  PERCENT
8ACKGRD MFTFR REAPINGXSCALE
P/>C*GRD PERCENT
SAMPLE  METFR READINGXSCALE
SAMPLE  PPM
HACKGRD METER READINGXSCALE
RACKGRD PPM
SAMPLE  METFR REAPINGXSCALE
SAMPLE  PPM
              READINGXSCALF
     RACKGRO PPM

     CONCENTRATION PPM
     CONCENTRATION PPM
     CONCENTRATION PCT
     CONCENTRATION PPM
     COMCEMTRAT[ON PPM
     MASS  GRAMS
     MASS  GRAMS
     MASS  GRAMS
     MASS  GRAMS
     MASS  GRAMS
                                                 fli.3/ a
                                                   H9
                                                  1013
                                                    .?/ 3
                                                     H
                                                   .07
                                                  78. n/
                                                  7R.O
                                                  -U.D/-0
                                                  -o.n
                                                  -o.nx-o
                                                  -n.n

                                                    81
                                                   150
                                                  l.lb
                                                  77.?
                                                   0.0
                                                  1.55
                                               ?717.59
                                                 11. hD
                                                  o.on
                             ,?7 GRAMS/KILOMETRE
                            H.P9 GRAMj/KlLOMETRE
                          »37.lb GRAMS/KILOMETRE
                            1.K7 r-PAMS/xILOMETRE
                            n.nn
              VEHICLE EMISSION RESULTS
      1975  LIGHT DUTY EMISSIONS TEST
DATF  »X19X77                     MFGR.  CODF    -n
ENGINE   5.7* LITHE               CURB WT.     0 KG

                             WET PULB TEMP  IB.9 DEG. C
                              ABS. HUMIDITY  U.9 GRAMSXKG
                                                                       BLOWER INLET PRESS., Gl 7?3.9 MM. H?0
                                                                       BLOWER INLET TEMP.   13 DEG. C
                                         HObbb
                                          39.5X ?
                                            39
                                           B.BX ?
                                             9
                                          31. OX 3
                                           73?
                                           2.3X11
                                             7
                                          98. SX 3
                                          l.Rb
                                           H.HX 3
                                           .07
                                          b7.2X 2
                                          b7.2
                                            ,9X P
                                            .^
                                          -o.ox-o
                                          -0.0
                                          -n.ox-o
                                          -0.0

                                            32
                                           b85
                                          1.80
                                          hb.t
                                           0.0
                                          l^
                                         bO.32
                                       2501.92
                                         10.00
                                          o.no
                                                                                                            YR.
                                                                                                            GVM
                                                                                                                    n Kr,
                                                                  bb.n/ 3
                                                                  1.18
                                                                   !.<»
                                                                   0,0
                                                                   .90
                                                                 3b,95
                                                               ?bB0.78
                                                                  9.H?
                                                                  0.00
     WEIGHTED  MASS  HC
     WEIGHTED  MASS  Cn
     WEIGHTED  MASS  CO?
     WEIGHTED  MAS«>  NOX
     WEIGHTED  MASS  SO?
  CARflON  BALANCE FUEL  CONSUMPTION = J9.?b LITRES PEH HUNDRED KILOMETRES
  TOTAL CVS FLOW s   ?R).?  RTP.  CU.

-------
          TABLE
                       EXHAUST EMISSIONS FROM SINGLE BAG SAMPLE
                             VEHICLE NUMBER   7
   DATE  -t/lq/77
   MODEL  iq?b CHEVY IMPALA
   DRIVER   SR
   WET BULB TEMP  18 C
   SPEC. HUM.  10.q GRAM/KG
                         TIME    -0 HRS.
                         SET-7
                         TEST WT.  2177 KG.
                         DRY BULB TEMP  2H C
                         BARO.  737.» MM  HG.
        TEST  NO.   2
        ENGINE  5.7 LITREV  0
        GVW     0  KG
        REL.  HUM.  55.fa  PCT
        MEASURED  FUEL  0.00  KG
W
I
M
Ln
     RUN DURATION
     BLOWER INLET PRESS. 723.q
     BLOWER DIF.  PRESS. 723.q
     BLOWER INLET TEMP.     «tt
     DYNO REVOLUTIONS
     BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
     BLOWER CU. CM /REV.
                     23.27 MINUTES
                           MM. H20
                           MM  H20
                       tt  DEG. C
                    32830
                     112088
                     2232
                  METER READING/SCALE
                  PPM
          BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
          BACKGRD PPM
          SAMPLE  METER READING/SCALE
          SAMPLE  PPM
          BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
BAG RESULTS
 HC  SAMPLE
 HC  SAMPLE
 HC
 HC
 CO
 CO
 CO
 CO  BACKGRD PPM
 C02 SAMPLE  METER READING/SCALE
 Cba SAMPLE  PERCENT
 COS BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
 COS BACKGRD PERCENT
 NOX SAMPLE  METER READING/SCALE
 NOX SAMPLE  PPM
 NOX BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
 NOX BACKGRD PPM
     CONCENTRATION PPM
     CONCENTRATION PPM
 C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
 NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
 302 COCENTRATION PPM
     MASS (GRAMS)
     MASS (GRAMS)
 C02 MASS (GRAMS)
 NOX MASS (GRAMS)
 S02 MASS (GRAMS)
   HC  GRAMS/KILOMETRE      .10
   co  GRAMS/KILOMETRE     5.53
   C02 GRAMS/KILOMETRE   357
   NOX GRAMS/KILOMETRE     l.bl
   S02 GRAMS/KILOMETRE     0.00

   HC  GRAMS/KG OF FUEL    .8*
   CO  GRAMS/KG OF FUEL   H7.q
   C02 GRAMS/KG OF FUEL   3091
   NOX GRAMS/KG OF FUEL  If.bt
   S02 GRAMS/KG OF FUEL   0.00
      HC
      CO
      HC
      CO
   21.7/2
     25
    8.5/2
      q
   23.0/3
    532
    2. I/*
      b
   tb.7/2
   a. 10
    2.3/2
    .08
                                                 l.f/B
                                                 l.H
                                                  18
   2.03
   11. b
   0.0
   2.11
 120.11
7752. q?
  3b.71
   0.00
                              HC  GRAMS/MIN    .Oq
                              CO  GRAMS/MIN    5.2
                              C02 GRAMS/MIN    333
                              NOX GRAMS/MIN   1.58
                              S02 GRAMS/MIN   0.00
   CARBON BALANCE FUEL ECONOMY =   IS.bS LITRES PER HUNDRED KILOMETERS

-------
            TABLF
                         EXHAUST  EMISSIONS FROM SINGLE BAG SAMPLE
                               VEHICLE NUMBER   7
    DATE   f/19/77               TIME    -0 MRS.        TEST NO.  2
    MODEL   197h  CHEVY  IMPALA    SET-?                  ENGINE 5.7 LITREO
    HUN  DURATION   23.27  MIN.   DISTANCE DRIVEN  el.7* KILOMETRES
    cvs  HLUHFR  TEST  VOL.   250.21  ACT.  cu. METRES
    SUIFATE  DATA
                                SAMPLE
                                                   BACKGROUND
CD
I
CTi
 FILTER NO.              H7-FH-280B
 SAMPLE VOL. CU. FT.         IS. 79
 SAMPLE TEMP. DEG. F            88
 SAMPLE AREA SO. IN.     H9251.00
 DILUTION FACTOR                 1
 STAND. DEN. MICROG/ML       20.00
 STAND. AREA 30. IN.    153135.00
 SrmMICROG/FILTER         b^.321

SULFUR DIOXIDE DATA

 SAMPLE VOL. CU. FT.          1.00
 SAMPLE TEMP. OEG. F            70
 AREA,BUBBLEK 1               0.00
 OIL. FACT.,BUBBLER 1            1
 AREA,8URBLER 2               0.00
 OIL. FACT..BUBBLER 2            1
 STAND. DEN. MICROG/ML        i.oo
 STAND. AREA,SO. IN.          1.00
 SOS, MILLIG/BUBBLEK 1       0.000
 S02, MILLIG/BUBBLEH 2       0.000
 S02, PPM                     n.o

SULFATE AND S02 EMISSIONS

 NET SULFATE,MILLIGRAM/TEST            32.312
 NFT H2304,MILLIGRAM/TEST              32.991
 NET S02,GRAM/TEST                      0.000
 NET SULFATE,MILLIGRAM/KILOMETRE        l.'tab
 NET H2SOH,MILLIGRAM/KILOMETRE          1.518
 NET S02,GRAM/KILOMETRE                 0.000
                                                           1.00
                                                             70
                                                           0.00
                                                              1
                                                           1.00
                                                           1.00
                                                          n.ooo
       i.oo
         70
       0.00
          1
       0.00
          1
       1.00
       1.00
      0.000
      0.000
        0.0
    SULFUR BALANCE
     FUEL HT., 250R GRAMS
               SULFUR,GRAMS
               PCT. RECOVERY
                          SULFUR IN FUEL,  .0310  PCT.
                           FUEL      S02       H2SOt
                            .78
                                    0.000
                                     0.00
.0108
 1.39
802 + H2SOH

    .0108
     1.39

-------
INTT MO.    7
^EHICI E MODEL

1AROMF1FP 7T7. I
•)RY BUL* TFMF.
?EL. HU
    T F S T M n .    K
CHFVY IMPALA

  MM OF H G .
  ?S.!t DEC. C
   7)  PCT.
                     TABLE                    VEHICLE  EMISSION RESULTS
                                     M7S  LIGHT  DUTY EMISSIONS TEST
                               DATE  S/ W77                      MFGR. CODF   -II
                               ENGINE   S.7t  LITRE                CURB WT.     0 KG

                                                             WF1 BULB TEMP  21.1 DEG.  C
                                                              AB3. HUMIDITY  I1*.5  GRAMS/KG
YR.
GVM
0 KG
:XHAUST
 OTF. PPFSS., UP,
SUI.TS
                              71J .?. MM. HPO
RAG ")0.
PLO^F'J REVOLUTIONS
HC SAMPLE MFTFR READING/SCALE
HC i A M P L E PPM
HC HACKGRD MfrTFR RF AD T NG/SC ALE
HC 4ACKGRD PPM
CO SAMPLE MFTFR RFADTNG/SCALF
CO SAMPLE PPM
CO BAC*GRI> MF.TFR RFADTNG/SCALF
CO BACKGRD DPM
COP SAMPLE MFTER RF AD T NG/SC ALE
COP SAMPLE PERCENT
CO? RACKGRO Ml'TF.R RF A D T NG/ SC ALE
CO? BACKGRD PERCENT
fJOX SAMPLE METER RFADTNG/SCALF
D3 NOX ;i AMPLE PPM
' NOX HACKGRO MfTFR READING/SCALE
^j MOX HACKGKD PPM
SO? SAMPLE MFTFR READING/SCALE
SO? SAMPLE PPM
SO? BACKGRD MFTFR READING/SCALE
SO? BACKGRD PPM
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
TO CONCENTRATION PPM
CO? CONCENTRATION PCT
MOV CONCENTRATION PPM
SO? CONCFNTRAT TON PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAI1S
COP MASS GRAMS P1
NOX MASS GRAMS
SOP MASS GRAMS
WEIGHTED MASS HC . ] H GRAMS/KILOMFTRE
WEIGHTED MASS CO .R? GRAMS/KILOMFTRE
WEIGHTED MASS co? tpn.pn GRAMS/KILOMETRE
WEIGHTFD MASS NOX 2.?? GRAMS/KILOMETRE
WFTGHTFD MASS SOP n.HO GRAMS/KILOMETRE
I
t'i?7n
'i n . 3 / 2
Sll
U.I/ P
1 1
7R.3/1?
IRS
.h/1 P
1
t? . */ 2
I.R7
l.b/ 2
. nb
P4 . I/ 2
Rt . I
1.5/ P
t .5
-O.H/-I1
~o.n
-0.0/-0
-n.o
1 1
170
l.RP
RP. R
11.11
1.7R
.15.07
i 1 5 . 3 1
1. 3.7S
n.nn





                                                         BLOWER INLET PRESS., Gl  711.2  MM.  HPO
                                                         BLOWER INLET TEMP.   13  DEG. C
                                                                    1 R . 3 / 5
                                                                      18
                                                                    11. R/ P
                                                                      IP
                                                                     7.P/13
                                                                       7
                                                                      .P/IP
                                                                       n
                                                                    b5.7/ 3
                                                                    1. 1R
                                                                     i .<;/ a
                                                                     .us
                                                                    th.S/ P
                                                                    ff.,5
                                                                     1. 7/ 2
                                                                     1.7
                                                                    - n . i) / - n
                                                                    -O.I)
                                                                    -n.il/-o
                                                                    -o.n

                                                                       R
                                                                       b
                                                                    1.13
                                                                    f t.q
                                                                     n.o
                                                                     .57
                                                                   1P..7R
                                                                    o.no
                                                                      2b.7/ 2
                                                                        27
                                                                      12. H/ 2
                                                                        12
                                                                      5b.b/13
                                                                        5f
                                                                       1.2/13
                                                                         1
                                                                      R9.B/ 3
                                                                      1 .h7
                                                                       H.3/ 3
                                                                       .07
                                                                      H7.5/ 2
                                                                      87.5
                                                                       1.7/2
                                                                       1.7
                                                                      -0.0/-0
                                                                      -0.0
                                                                      -0.0/-0
                                                                      -0.0

                                                                        Ib
                                                                        5U
                                                                      1 .b2
                                                                      8h.n
                                                                       o.o
                                                                      H.tl
                                                                   2252. ?0
                                                                     It.PS
                                                                      o.no
   CARBON BALANCE  FUEL CONSUMPTION =  I7.qq LITRES
   TOTAL CVS FLOW  T.    Pfll.H STO. CO.  METRFS
                                                    PFR  HUNDRED KILOMETRES

-------
          TABLE
                       EXHAUST EMISSIONS FROM SINGLE BAG SAMPLE
                             VEHICLE NUMBER   7
   DATE  5/ 5/77
   MODEL  i97h CHEVY FM 7
   DRIVER   3R
   WET "UJLH TFMP  ?1 C
   SPEC. HUM.   M.s GRAM/KG
     RUN DURATION
     BLOWER INLET PRESS.
     BLOWER DIF.  PRESS.
     BLOWER INLET TEMP.
     DYNO REVOLUTIONS
     BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
     BLOWER CU.  CM /REV.
                         TIME    -n HR3.
                         SET 7
                         TEST WT.  ??h7 KG.
                         DRY BULB TEMP  ?5 C
                         HARD.  737.1 MM  HG.
                     ?3.?8 MINUTES
                    711.2  MM. H?0
                           MM  H?0
                   711.?
                      H5
                   31811
                           OEG. C
                                               TEST NO.  ?
                                               ENGINE 5.7 LITREV R
                                               GVW    0 KG
                                               REL. HUM.  70.9 PCT
                                               MEASURED FUEL  o.on KG
                     ??39
CD
i
CD
                  METER READING/SCALE
                  PPM
          BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
          BACKGRO PPM
          SAMPLE  METER READING/SCALE
          SAMPLE  PPM
          BACKGRD METFR READING/SCALE
BAG RESULTS
 HC  SAMPLE
 HC  SAMPLE
 HC
 HC
 CO
 CO
 CO
 CO  BACKGRO PPM
 CO? SAMPLE  METER READING/SCALE
 CO? SAMPLE  PERCENT
 CO? BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
 CO? BACKGRD PERCENT
             METER READING/SCALE
             PPM
 NOX BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
 NOX BACKGRD PPM
 HC  CONCENTRATION PPM
 CO  CONCENTRATION PPM
 CO? CONCENTRATION PCT
 NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
 SO? COCENTRATION PPM
     MASS (GRAMS)
     MASS (GRAM3)
NOX SAMPLE
NOX SAMPLE
      HC
      CO
      CO?  MAS3  (GRAMS)
      NOX  MASS  (GRAMS)
      SO?  MASS  (GRAMS)

   HC   GRAMS/KILOMETPE       .os
   CO   GRAMS/KILOMETRE       .18
   CO?  GRAMS/KILOMETRE    331
   NOX  GRAMS/KILOMETRE      ?.»»
   30?  GRAMS/KILOMETRE      0.00

   HC   GRAMS/KG OF  FUEL     .»b
   CO   GRAMS/KG OF  FUEL     1.7
   co?  GRAMS/KG OF  FUEL    sibs
   NOX  GRAMS/KG OF  FUEL   ?3.?9
   SO?  GRAMS/KG OF  FUEL    0.00
   CARBON  BALANCE FUEL  ECONOMY a
   19.O/?
     11
   11.9/2
     1?
   1R.7/*
     18
     .7/*
      1
   •H.0/2
   1.95
    1.9/2
    .07
   39.8/3
  119.»
     .9/3
    ?.7
      9
     Ib
   1.89
  117.1
   0.0
   I.Ob
   3.8fa
7?bO.?8
  53.»1
   0.00
                              HC  GRAMS/MIN    .05
                              co  GRAMS/MIN     .?
                              CO? GRAMS/MIN    31?
                              NOX GRAM3/MIN   ?.?9
                              30? GRAMS/MIN   n.nn
                              1H.23 LITRES PER HUNDRED KILOMETERS

-------
            TABLE
W
I
                         EXHAUST  EMISSIONS  FROM  SINGLE  BAG  SAMPLE
                               VEHICLE  NUMRER    7
    DATE  5/ 5/77               TIME     -0  MRS.         TEST  NO.   2
    MODEL  H7b CHEVY EM  7      SET  7                   ENGINE  5.7 LITREO
    RUN DURATION    S3. 28  MIN.   DISTANCE DRIVEN   21.1*  KILOMETRES
    CVS BLOWER TEST  VOL.  551.30  ACT.  CU.  METRES
                           SAMPLE
SULFATE DATA               	

 FILTER NO.              *7-FH-2soi
 SAMPLE VOL. CU. FT.        13.55
 SAMPLE TEMP. DEC. F           8b
 SAMPLE AREA SQ. IN.    Ib7*17.00
 DILUTION FACTOR                5
 STAND. DEN. MICROG/ML      20.00
 STAND. AREA SO. IN.    177*50.HO
 SO*,MICROG/FILTER        1*3.*bO

SULFUR DIOXIDE DATA

 SAMPLE VOL. CU. FT.         1.00
 SAMPLE TEMP. DEG. F           70
 AREA,BUBBLER 1              0.00
 OIL. FACT.,BUBBLER 1           1
 AREA,BUBBLER 2              n.OO
 OIL. FACT..BUBBLER 2           1
 STAND. DEN. MICROG/ML       1.00
 STAND. AREA,SQ. IN.         1.00
 soa, MILLIG/BUBBLER i      o.ooo
 soa, MILLIG/BUBBLER 2      o.ooo
 802, PPM                     0.0

SULFATE AND 302 EMISSIONS

 NET SULFATE,MILLIGRAM/TEST
 NET H2SO*,MILLIGRAM/TEST
 NET 302,GRAM/TEST
 NET SULFATE,MILLIGRAM/KILOMETRE
 NET H2SO*,MILLIGRAM/KILOMETRE
 NET 302,GRAM/KILOMETRE
     SULFUR BALANCE
      FUEL  WT.,  221* GRAMS
                SULFUR,GRAMS
                PCT.  RECOVERY
                                          bll.702
                                          71*.31b
                                            0.000
                                           31.891
                                           32.5b1
                                            0.000
                                                       BACKGROUND
                                                           1 .00
                                                             70
                                                           0.00
                                                              1
                                                           1 .00
                                                           1.00
                                                          0.000
                  1.00
                    70
                  0.00
                     1
                  0.00
                     1
                  1.00
                  1.00
                             .71
o.ono
 0.00
                                                          0.000
                                                          0.000
                                                            0.0
                          SULFUR  IN FUEL,  .0310 PCT.
                           FUEL      302       H2SO*
,233b
32.85
302 -f H2SO*

    .233b
    32.85

-------
•a r  »HI.              i e s i NO. *
 HICIF  MODEL  LHI-VY IMPALA
                                  TAHLF                    VEHICLE  EMISSION RESULTS
                                                  1175  LIGHT  DUTY  EMISSIONS TEST
                                            |)*TE  5/10/77                      MFGR.  CODE
                                            ENGINE   5.7H  LITRE  8              CURB NT.
                      -n
                      n KG
                            YR.
                            GVM
117b
   0 KG
CD
I
ro
o
»R(i
•>Y
:l .
XHA






























*(• IE W 7 17. h? MM OF hG.
MILE FK»'F. 27. H DfK. C
HUM 1 1) I TY S? PC 1 .
I'M FMjr-SlilNS
HLOWhK OIF. PiaSb., (-?, bH7.7 MM. H?0
RAb HE.'JULTS
RAi, NO.
HC SAt-.PLE HE1EK Kh 40] MG/oCALE
HC SAr-.HLF PP«
HC fiACKGHD MflFR I'E ADI NG/SCALE
HL HACKGRU PPM
CO SAMPLE MEIER READING/SCALE
CO SAMPLE PPM
CU FIACKGHD MEIER ME ADI NU/ 5C ALE
CO RACKGKO PPM
TO? SArtPLE METER READING/SCALE
CO? SAMPLE PERCENT
CO? RACKGHD METEH RF All I NG/SC ALE
CUP HACKiJHD PF.Hlt.HT
NOX SAMPLE METER RKAI3I NG/SC ALE
NOX SArPLE PPM
NOX HACKGWl) METER Rfc AL) I NG/SC ALE
NOX HACKGKD PPM
SO? SAMPLF METFfi READING/SCALE
So? SAMPLE PPM
SO? HACKGKD hETER Rt AL) IMG/bC AL E
SO? HACKORO PPM
HC CONCENTKA1 ION PPM
CO CONCEUTRATICN PPM
CO? COKCENTHATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRA IION PPM
S02 CONCENTKATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS






i
51.H/2
51
15.0/2
IS
b3.S/*
If?
b.l/*
11
f 2.8/2
1.81
1.8/2
.07
27.3/3
81.1
.4/3
1.2
-O.O/*
-n.o
-O.O/*
-0.0
38
125
1.83
80.1
0.0
l.bl
11.13
CO? MASS GRAMS 2580.52







NOX MASS GRAMS
S02 MASS GRAMS
WEIGHTED MASS HC .it GKAMS/KILOMETRE
WEIGHTED MASS CO .rtl GRAMS/KILOMETRE
WEIGHTED MASS co? >4(iq.77 GKAMS/KILOMFTRE
"EIGMTFO MASS NOX t^.ns C-H AMS/K ILOf FTRE
WEIGHTED MASS so? i,.no C.KAMS/KILOKETRE
12.51
o.no





                                                                          WET BULB TEMP  20.b DEC. C
                                                                           ABS.  HUMIDITY  12.5 GRAMS/KG
                                                                          BLOHER INLET PRESS., 61 b-»7.7 MM.
                                                                          BLOWER INLET TEMP.   »3 DEC. C
                                       H20
                                                                        2
                                                                     70107
                                                                      ?0.
                                                                        ?U
                                                                       3.b/«
                                                                         b
1.12
 1.8/2
 .07
•»5.b/2
HS.b
  .H/3
 1.2
-O.O/*
-0.0
-O.O/*
-0.0
                                                                      I.Ob
                                                                      SH.5
                                                                       0.0
                                                                       .55
                                                                      2.17
                                                                   2SbS.07
                                                                     11.11
                                                                      0.00
                 87.7/2
                   28
                 12.
                   12
    1.5/*
      >»
   88.5/3
   l.bS
    H.l/3
    .Ob
   87.3/2
   87.3
    l.H/2
    l.H
   -O.O/*
   -0.0
   -O.O/*
   -0.0

     17
     55
   1.5S
   Bb.l
    0.0
    .75
   4.88
2228.50
  13.31
   0.00
     CAP60N hALANCE FUEL PONSl'MPTIOU = 17.55 LITHES PER HUNDRED KILOMETRES
     TOTAL LV:, hLUH =   BBH.b  STl).  CU. METRFS

-------
          r A H i. F.
                       FXHAUST EMISSIONS  FKfM SINGLE BAG SAMPLE
                                      NUMBER
  DATE   5/10X77
  MODEL   iq?b  CHEVY
  DRIVER    SR
  WET HUI.U  TEMP  21 C
  SPEC.  HUM.   11.5 GRAM/KG
                            TIME    -n MRS.
                            SFI-7
                            TES1 WF.  S?h7 KG.
                            DRY HULB TEMP  10  C
                            BAKU.  737.1 MM  HG.
        TEST NO.  B
        FNGINE 5.7 LITRE   S
        GVW    0 KG
        REL. HUM.  "»S.S PCT
        MEASURED FUEL  n.UO  KG
    RUN  DURATION
    RLUWER  INLET PRESS.
            OIF.   PRESS.
            INLET TEMP.
    DYNO REVOLUTIONS
    BLOWER  REVOLUTIONS
    BLOWER  CU.  CM /REV.
                        P.1.3H MINUTES
                       bMl.t  MM. H30
                       bb'l.t  MM  HSO
                          »3  OEG. C
                       3l7oq
                          SS35
Cd
i
to
  BAU RESULTS
   HC  SAMPLE   METER READING/SCALE
   HC  SAMPLE   PPM
   HC  fUCKGRD  METER READING/SCALE
   HC  FiACKGRI)  PPM
   CO  SAMPLE   METER READ ING/SCALE
   CO  SAMPLE   PPM
   CO  BACKGRO  METER READING/SCALE
   CO  BACKGRO  PPM
   COS SAMPLE   METER READING/SCALE
   COS SAMPLE   PERCENT
   CO? RACKGRO  METER READING/SCALE
   COS rtACKGRO  PERCENT
   NOX SAMPLE   METER READING/SCALE
   NOX SAMPLE   PPM
   NOX UACKGRO  METER READING/SCALE
   NOX RACKGRD  P^M
   HC  CONCENTRATION PPM
   CO  CONCENTRATION PPM
   COS CONCENTRATION PCT
   NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
   SOS COCENTRATION PPM
   HC  MASS  (GRAMS)
   CO  MASS  (GRAMS)
   COS MASS  (GRAMS)
   NOX MASS  (GRAMS)
   SOS MASS  (GRAMS)

HC  GRAMS/KILOMETRE      .OR
CO  GRAMS/KILOMETRE      .17
CO? GRAMS/KILOMETRE   3Sb
NOX GRAMS/KILOMETRE     ?.07
SO? GRAMS/KILOMETRE     n.OO

HC  GRAMS/KG OF FUEL    .HO
CO  GRAMS/KG OF FUEL    1.7
COS GRAMS/KG OF FUEL   31hM
NOX liWAMS/KR OF FUEL  sn.flb
SO? GRAMS/HG OF FUEL   P.00
     SB
   1S.S/S
     i<;
   i 'i. i / *
     11
    3.0/*
      3
   13.0/S
   1.10
    2.0/3
    .07
   3b.q/3
  110.7
     .7/3
    S.I
     15
     15
   1.8»
  108.q
   0.0
   1.81
   3.75
7l?7.3q
  15.18
   (1.00
                                    HC   GRAMS/MTN    .us
                                    CO   QRAMS/MIN     . ?.
                                    COS GRAHS/niN    30b
                                    NOX GRAMS/MIN   1 . 'It
                                    SOS GRAMS/MIN   II.11(1
  CARBON  BALANCe FUEL ECONOMY  =    M.qb I.ITRFS PFH HUNDRED KILOMETERS

-------
       T A S L F
                     EXHAUST  EMISSIONS FMl'-l  SINGLE  HAG SAMPLE
                           VEHICLE
OATf   S/lU/77
MQDI-L  117K CHEVY
RUN [HIHATIUN    ?3.?R
CVS Hl.UWrH  TEST  VOL.
      TIME    -n  MRS.
      SET-7
MIN.  DISTANCE DRIVEN
 251.37 ACT. nj.  MtTRF

      SAMPLE
                                              Pl.RI,
sui (-
        DATA
 FILHR HO.               t7FH-?Rin
 SAMIM.E VOL. cu.  FT.         n.3h
 SAMPI.K TEMP. DEG.  F            us
 S4MPLF AREA SO.  IN.     2n31Hn.nil
 DILU1ION FACTOR                 ^
 STAND. DEN. MICROG/ML       ?0.nn
 STAND. AREA SO.  IN.     190837.00
 SOH,MICPO(;/FILTER        inh-».b7B

SULFUR DIOXIDE  OATA
      E VOL. CU.  FT.          1.00
      E TEMP.  OEG.  F            70
      HUMBLER  1               O.dO
      FACf.,BUBBLER 1            1
      HIIHFILER  ?               o.nn
      F»cr.,flUB8LER ?            l
        DEN. MICROG/ML      ?o.no
        AREA,SO.  IN.          1.00
      MILLIG/BUBBLER  1      0.000
      MILLIG/HUHRLER  P      o.ooo
      PPM                      0.0
SULFATF AND SO?  EMISSIONS






CO
1
M
SAMPI.
SAMP[_
AREA,
OIL.
AREA,
OIL.
STAND
STAND
sn?.
 MET
 HE i
 NET
 NET
 NET
 NET
SULFUR BALANCE
 FUEL «T.,
     SULTATEf MILLIGRAM/TEST
     He?sii*, MK.LIGRAM/TFST
     so?, GRAM/TEST
     SULFA1E, MILLIGRAM/KILOMETRE
     Hesn>t,MILLIi;RAM/KILOMETRE
                                      798. lOb
                                        n.nnn
                                        3b.S<";
                                        o.nnn
                                                    TEST NO.
                                                    FNT.INE 5.7
                                                    KILOMETRES
                                                    BACKGROUND
                                                        i .nn
                                                          70
                                                        o.nn
                                                           l
                                                        1 .no
                                                        l .on
                                                       o.nno
                                                        i .no
                                                          70
                                                        o.oo
                                                           l
                                                        n. nn
                                                           1
                                                       an.oo
                                                        i .00
                                                       o.ono
                                                       o.non
                                                         n.o
                                                               LITWEO
                GRAMS
           SULFUR,GRAMS
           PCT. RECOVERY
                           SULFUR IN FUEL,  .0310  PCT.
                            FUEL      SO?        H2SOH
                             .711
                                     o.nnn
                                                 3B. IS
                                      SO? +  H?SO-»


                                          .8bb5
                                          38. Ib

-------
                                TA9LF
UNIT NO.    7
VEHICLE MUDFL
      TEST NO.
IMPALA EM 7
BAROMETER 731.31 MM OF  HG.
DRY BULB TEMP.   22.8 DEG.  C
REL. HUMIDITY     82 PCT.

EXHAUST EMISSIONS
              VEHICLE EMISSION RESULTS
      1.175  LIGHT DUTY EMISSIONS  TEST
DATE  5/1B/77                      MFGR.  CODE    -0
ENGINE   5.7t LITRE 8              CURB  WT.      0 KG

                             WET  BULB TEMP  30. b DEG.  C
                              ABS. HUMIDITY   It.b  GRAMS/KG
                                                              YH.
                                                              GVM
117b
   0 KG
BLOWER DIP. PRESS.,
RAG
BAG
RESULTS
NO.
G2, 711.2 MM


RLOWER REVOLUTIONS
HC
HC
HC
HC
CO
CO
CO
CO
C02
C02
CO?
CO?
NOX
CO NOX
M NOX
U) NOX
S02
S02
S02
S02
HC
CO
cn?
NOX
S02
HC
CO
C02
NOX
S02
SAMPLE METER
SAMPLE PPM
BACKGRO METER
BACKGRD PPM
SAMPLE METER
SAMPLE PPM
BACKGRD METER
BACKGRD PPM
SAMPLE METER
READING/SCALE

READING/SCALE

READING/SCALE

READING/SCALE

READING/SCALE
SAMPLE PERCENT
BACKGRD METER
READING/SCALE
BACKGRD PERCENT
SAMPLE METER
SAMPLE PPM
BACKGRO METER
BACKGRD PPM
SAMPLE METER
SAMPLE PPM
BACKGRD METER
BACKGRD PPM
CONCENTRATION
CONCENTRATION
CONCENTRATION
CONCENTRATION
CONCENTRATION
MASS GRAMS
MASS GRAMS
MASS GRAMS
MASS GRAMS
MASS GRAMS
READING/SCALE

READING/SCALE

READING/SCALE

READING/SCALE

PPM
PPM
PCT
PPM
PPM





                                        H?O
     1
  HO 7 30
   12.1/2
     12
   1H.3/2
     1H
   bb.O/*
    1H8
     .H/*
      I
   10.1/3
   1.70
    2.1/3
    .OH
   Hb.3/3
  138.1
     .5/3
    1.5
   -n.o/*
   -o.o
   -n.o/*
   -o.o

     Rll
    131
   i.bb
  137.b
    n.o
   3.HI
  12.30
2320.2b
  23.00
   u.on
     WEIGHTED  MASS  HC
     WEIGHTED  MASS  co
     WEIGHTED  MASS  CO?
     WEIGHTED  MASS  NOX
     WEIGHTED  MASS  so?
             .21 GRAMS/KILOMETRE
             .15 GRAMS/KILOMETRE
          373.?! GRAMS/KILOMETRE
            2.22 GRAMS/KILOMETRE
            O.nn GRAMS/KILOMETRE
                                                        BLOWER  INLET PRESS.,  Gl 711.2 MM. H20
                                                        BLOWER  INLET TEMP.    t3 r>EG. C
                                                                   2t).b/2
                                                                     ?1
                                                                   15.3X2
                                                                     15
                                                                   12. n/*
                                                                     11
                                                                     .7/*
                                                                      1
                                                                   57.1/3
                                                                   i.n?
                                                                    t.l/3
                                                                    .Ob
                                                                   31.9/2
                                                                   31.1
                                                                     .b/3
                                                                    1.8
                                                                   -O.O/*
                                                                   -n.o
                                                                   -o.n/*
                                                                   -n.n

                                                                      b
                                                                     in
                                                                    .ib
                                                                   38.?
                                                                    u.n
                                                                    .HI
                                                                   l.HR
                                                                2310.57
                                                                  10.Ib
                                                                   o.nn
                                                                     3R.b/2
                                                                       31
                                                                     lb.b/2
                                                                       17
                                                                     18. b/*
                                                                      100
                                                                      1.8/*
                                                                        2
                                                                     83. 7/3
                                                                     1.55
                                                                      3.2/3
                                                                      .ns
                                                                     b3.7/2
                                                                     b3.7
                                                                       .8/2
                                                                       .8
                                                                     -O.O/*
                                                                     -0.0
                                                                     -O.O/*
                                                                     -n.o
                                                                       13
                                                                     1.50
                                                                     b3.0
                                                                      0.0
                                                                     1.05
                                                                     8.11
                                                                  2017.22
                                                                    10.50
                                                                     0.00
   CARBON BALANCE  FUEL  CONSUMPTION = lb.01 LITRES PER HUNDRED KILOMETRES
   TOTAL CVS FLOW  =    282.*  STD.  CU. METRES

-------
         TAHLF
                      FXHAUSf EMISSIONS  FROM  SINGLE  BAG  SAMPLE
                            VEHICLE  NIJM8FR    9
   ATE  S/lfi/7?
   lOPiFL  197b 1NPALA EM  1
   iKIVH*   SR
   IFT FMILR TFMP  ?o c
   (PFC. HUM.  1?.9 GUAM/KG
TIME    -II HRS.
SET-7
TEST WT.  ??b7 KG.
DRY BULK TEMP  ?S C
BARO.  739.1 MM  HG.
                                                 TEST  NO.   1
                                                 ENGINE  5.7 LITREV R
                                                 GVW     n  KG
                                                 REL.  HUM.   h3.3  PCT
                                                 MEASURED  FUEL   n.nn KG
CO
I
M
PUN DURATION         ?3.?9 MINUTES
RLOWER INLET PRESS. 711.?  MM.  HPO
RLOWFR OIF.  PRESS. 7ii.r  MM   H?O
PLOWtR INLET TEMP.     H3  DEG. C
DYNO REVOLUTIONS    3189H
RLOHER REVOLUTIONS   ll?35R
RLOWER cu. CM /REV.  eeao

SAG RESULTS
 HC  SAMPLE  METER READING/SCALE
 HC  SAMPLE  PPM
 HC  RACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
 HC  RACKGRO PPM
 co  SAMPLE  METER READING/SCALE
 co  SAMPLE  PPM
 CO  RACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
 CO  RACKGRD PPM
 CO? SAMPIE  METER RFADIMG/SCALE
 CO? SAMPLE  PERCENT
 CO? RACKGRO METER READING/SCALE
 CO? RACKGRD PERCENT
 NUX SAMPLE  METER READING/SCALE
 NOX SAMPLE  PPM
 NOX RACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
 NOX RACKGRD PPM
 HC  CONCENTRATION PPM
 CO  CONCENTRATION PPM
 CO? CONCENTRATION PCT
 NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
 SOP COCENTRATION PPM
 HC  MASS (GRAMS)
 CO  MASS (GRAMS)
 CO? MASS (GRAMS)
 NOX MASS (GRAMS)
 SO? MASS (GRAMS)
                                                  2?
                                                  .*
                                                  15
                  l.Bf
                   S.H/3
                   .OB
                  31.1/3
                  13.3
                                                 1.?
                                                   q
                                                  38
                                                1.77
                                                1?.3
                                                0.0
                                                1.07
                                                S.1H
                                              39.90
                                               0.00
  HC   GRAMS/KILOMETRE      .05
  co   GRAMS/KILOMETRE      .•»?.
  Cn?  GRAMS/KILOMETRE   310
  NOX  GRAMS/KILOMETRE     1.B1
  SO?  GWAMS/KILOMETRE     0.00

  HC   GRAMS/KG  OF  FUEL    .sn
  CO   GRAMS/KG  OF  FUFL    H.3
  co?  GRAMS/KG  OF  FUEL   3ibi
  MOX  GRAMS/KG  OF  FUEL  1R.90
  SO?  GRAMS/KG  OF  FUEL   n.nn
  CARBON  BALANCE FUEL FCHNOHY =
                              HC  GRAMS/MIN     .05
                              CO  GRAMS/MIN      .H
                              CO? GRAMS/MIN
                              NOX GRAMS/MIN
                              30? RRAMS/MIN
                              13.21 LITRF3 PER  HUNDRED  KILOMETERS
                     1.71
                     n.nij

-------
            TABLE
03
I
                         EXHAUST EMISSIONS FROM SINGLE BAG SAMPLE
                               VEHICLE NUMBER   9
DATE  5/1H/77               TIME     -0  MRS.
MODEL  117b IMPALA EM 7     SET-7
RUN DURATION   S3.P9 MIN.   DISTANCE  DRIVEN   SI.'
cvs BLOWER TEST VOL.  250.58 ACT. cu.  METRES

                            SAMPLE
SULFATE DATA	

 FILTER NO.              47 FH SHI?
 SAMPLE VOL. CU. FT.        14.SS
 SAMPLE TEMP. DEC. F           85
 SAMPLE AREA SO. IN.     10Rqb7.00
 DILUTION FACTOR                 1
 STAND. DEN. MICROG/Ml.      SO.00
 STAND. AREA SO. IN.     Iflbbh7.00
 S04,MICROG/FILTER         lib.750

SULFUR DIOXIDE DATA
 SAMPLE VOL. CU. FT.
 SAMPLE TEMP. DEC. F
 AREA,BUBBLER 1
 OIL.  FACT.,BUBBLER 1
 AREA,BUBBLER S
 OIL.  FACT.,BUBBLER ?
 STAND. DEN. MICROG/ML
 STAND. AREA,SO. IN.
 802,  MILLIG/BUBBLER 1
 sos,  MILLIG/BUBBLER s
 SOS,  PPM

SULFATE AND SOS EMISSIONS
                              1.00
                                70
                              0.00
                                 1
                              o.on
                                 l
                              1.00
                              1.00
                             0.000
                             0.000
                               0.0
      NET SULFATE,MILLIGRAM/TEST
      NET HSS04,MILLIGRAM/TEST
      NET sos,GRAM/TEST
      NET SULFATE,MILLIGRAM/KILOMETRE
      NET H2SOH,MILLIGRAM/KILOMETRE
      NET SOS,GRAM/KILOMETRE
     SULFUR BALANCE
      FUEL NT., 5J58 GRAMS
                SULFUR,GRAMS
                PCT. RECOVERY
                                       BO.ObS
                                       81.743
                                        0.000
                                        B.b'H
                                        3.717
                                        0.000
                                                       TEST NO.  1
                                                       ENGINE S.7 LITKEU
                                                       KILOMETRES
                                                       BACKGROUND
                                                           1 .00
                                                             70
                                                           0.00
                                                              1
                                                           ) .00
                                                           1.00
                                                          0.000
1.00
  70
0.00
   1
0.00
   1
1.00
1.00
                                                          0.000
                                                          0.000
                                                            0.0
                           SULFUR IN FUEL,  .0310 PCT.
                            FUEL      SOS       HSSOf
                                 .b7
                                     0.000
                                      0.00
                                                    .OSb7
    SOS + HSSOt

        .OSb7
         4.00

-------
   UNIT  NO.   952
   VEHICLE  MODEL
      TEST NO.
CHEVY IMPALA
   BAROMETER  739.1H  MM OF  HG.
   DRY  BULB  TEMP.    25.b  DEC.  C
   PEL.  HUMIDITY      37  PCT.
 TABLE                    VEHICLE  EMISSION  RESULTS
                 1975   LIGHT  DUTY EMISSIONS  TEST
1           DATE   5/2b/77                      MFGR.  CODE
           ENGINE   S.7H  LITRE  B              CURB  WT.
-0
0 KG
YR.
GVM
197b
   n KG
                                                       WET BULB TEMP  lb.1 DEC. C
                                                        ABS. HUMIDITY   7.7 GRAMS/KG
   EXHAUST  EMISSIONS

        BLOWER  DIF. PRESS.,
        BAG  RESULTS
          G2, 73b.b MM. H?0
                                        BLOWER  INLET  PRESS.,  Gl  73b.b  MM.  H20
                                        BLOWER  INLET  TEMP.    H3  DEC. C
03
I
to
CTi
BAG NO.
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
HC SAMPLE METER READING/SCALE
HC SAMPLE PPM
HC BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
HC BACKGRD PPM
CO SAMPLE METER READING/SCALE
CO SAMPLE PPM
CO BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
CO BACKGRD PPM
C02 SAMPLE METER READING/SCALE
CO? SAMPLE PERCENT
C02 BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
COS BACKGRD PERCtNT
NOX SAMPLE METER READING/SCALE
NOX SAMPLE PPM
NOX BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
NOX BACKGRD PPM
SO? SAMPLE METER READING/SCALE
SO? SAMPLE PPM
SO? BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
90? BACKGRD PPM
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
CO? CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
90? CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
1
H0821
7b.H/2
7b
?0.5/?
?0
bS.b/*
1H7
.7/*
1
H3.0/2
l.SO
1.7/2
.Ob
»b.9/3
1*0.7
.»/3
1.?
-O.O/*
0.0
-O.O/*
0.0
5S
139
1.8*
139.7
0.0
8.58
1?.?9
CO? MASS GRAMS 257b.38
NOX MASS GRAMS
90? MASS GRAMS
WEIGHTED MASS HC .?5 GRAMS/KILOMETRE
WEIGHTED MASS CO 1.25 GRAMS/KILOMETRE
WEIGHTED MASS CO? H39.37 GRAMS/KILOMETRE
WEIGHTED MASS NOX 1.H3 GRAMS/KILOMETRE
WEIGHTED MASS SO? 0.00 GRAMS/KILOMETRE
18. f 5
0.00





                                                                       2
                                                                    70505
                                                                     31.9/2
                                                                       3?
                                                                     17.2/2
                                                                       17
                                                                     51. 9/*
                                                                       H9
                                                                       .9/*
                                                                        2
                                                                     b9.1/3
                                                                     1.25
                                                                      1.7/2
                                                                      .Ob
                                                                     27.H/2
                                                                     27. <»
                                                    1.?
                                                   -O.O/*
                                                    0.0
                                                   -O.O/*
                                                    0.0

                                                     Ib
                                                     Hb
                                                   1.19
                                                   ?b.3
                                                    0.0
                                                   1.23
                                                   7.03
                                                2871.53
                                                   b.Ol
                                                   0.00
                                                       3
                                                    fOSbl
                                                     HO.1/2
                                                       HO
                                                     15.0/2
                                                       15
                                                     b2.9/*
                                                       bl
                                                      2.0/*
                                                        2
                                                     92.0/3
                                                     1.72
                                                      H.5/3
                                                      .07
                                                     H5.0/2
                                                     HS.O
                                                       .8/2
                                                       .8
                                                     -O.O/*
                                                      0.0
                                                     -O.O/*
                                                      0.0

                                                       27
                                                       5fa
                                                     l.bb
                                                     HH.3
                                                      0.0
                                                     l.H
                                                     H.97
                                                  2320.SB
                                                     S.8b
                                                     0.00
       FUEL ECONOMY BY CARBON  BALANCE  a    5.3   KILOMETRE/LITRE

-------
       TABLE
                    EXHAUST EMISSIONS FROM SINGLE BAG SAMPLE
                          VEHICLE NUMBER 152
DATE  5/2b/77
MODEL  117h CHEVY IMPALA
DRIVER   SR
WET BULB TEMP  S3 C
SPEC. HUM.  12.1 GRAM/KG
                         TIME    -0 HRS.
                         SET-7
                         TEST WT.   aab7 KG.
                         DRY BULB  TEMP  31  C
                         BARO.  737.1 MM   HG.
                            TEST NO.   a
                            ENGINE 5.7 LITREV 8
                            GVW    0  KG
                            REL. HUM.   *5.b PCT
                            MEASURED  FUEL  0.00  KG
  RUN DURATION
  BLOWER INLET PRESS.
  BLOWER DIF.  PRESS,
  BLOWER INLET TEMP.
  DYNO REVOLUTIONS
  BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
                     23.21 MINUTES
                    711.2  MM. H20
                           MM  H20
711.2
   H3

317tlb
 11231f
                           DEG. C
  BLOWER CU. CM /REV.  2230
               METER READING/SCALE
               PPM
       BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
       BACKGRD PPM
       SAMPLE  METER READING/SCALE
       SAMPLE  PPM
       BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
BAG RESULTS
 HC  SAMPLE
 HC  SAMPLE
 HC
 HC
 CO
 CO
 CO
 CO  BACKGRD PPM
 C02 SAMPLE  METER READING/SCALE
 C02 SAMPLE  PERCENT
 C02 BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
 C02 BACKGRD PERCENT
 NOX SAMPLE  METER READING/SCALE
 NOX SAMPLE  PPM
 NOX BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
 NOX BACKGRD PPM
 HC  CONCENTRATION PPM
 CO  CONCENTRATION PPM
 C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
 NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
 302 COCENTRATION PPM
 HC  MASS (GRAMS)
 CO  MASS (GRAMS)
 C02 MASS (GRAMS)
 NOX MASS (GRAMS)
 302 MASS (GRAMS)
HC  GRAMS/KILOMETRE       .08
CO  GRAMS/KILOMETRE     2.10
COS GRAMS/KILOMETRE   350
NOX GRAMS/KILOMETRE     1.13
SOa GRAMS/KILOMETRE     0.00


HC  GRAMS/KG OF FUEL    .72
CO  GRAMS/KG OF FUEL   18.8
COa GRAMS/KG OF FUEL   3137
NOX GRAMS/KG OF FUEL  10.lt
302 GRAMS/KG OF FUEL   0.00
                       25.3/2
                         25
                       ia.e/a
                         13
                       Bt.b/*
                        201
                        l.O/*
                          2
                       tS.S/a
                       a. 03
                        i.t/a
                        .05
                       se. a/a
                       ss. a
                                              181
                                             1.S1
                                             57. «f
                                             0.0
                                             1.75
                                            tS.lfa
                                          ?bSb.ao
                                            at. 75
                                             o.oo
                              HC  GRAMS/MIN    .07
                              CO  GRAMS/MIN    2.0
                              COa GRAMS/MIN    321
                              NOX GRAMS/MIN   I.Ob
                              302 GRAMS/MIN   0.00
CARBON BALANCE FUEL ECONOMY a   15.12 LITRES PER HUNDRED KILOMETERS

-------
            TABLE
                    EXHAUST EMISSIONS FROM SINGLE BAG SAMPLE
                          VEHICLE NUMBER 152
     DATE   s/2b/77               TIME    -o MRS.         TEST NO.   2
     MODEL   117b  CHEVY  IMPALA   3ET-7                  ENGINE 5.7 LITREO
     RUN DURATION   23.21 MIN.   DISTANCE DRIVEN   21. 8b KILOMETRES
     CVS 8LOMER  TEST VOL.  250.Hb ACT.  CU. METRES
CD
I
NJ
oo
                           SAMPLE
3ULFATE DATA               	

 FILTER NO.              H7FH-2811*
 SAMPLE VOL. CU. FT.        lt.H2
 SAMPLE TEMP. DEC. F           SO
 SAMPLE AREA SO. IN.     b»30«KOO
 DILUTION FACTOR                1
 STAND. DEN. MICROG/ML       5.00
 STAND. AREA SO. IN.    171881.00
 SO»,MICROG/FILTER         18.70b

SULFUR DIOXIDE DATA

 SAMPLE VOL. CU. FT.         1.00
 SAMPLE TEMP. DEC. F           70
 AREA,BUBBLER 1              0.00
 OIL. FACT.,BUBBLER 1           1
 AREA,BUBBLER 2              0.00
 OIL. FACT..BUBBLER 2           1
 STAND. DEN. MICROG/ML       1.00
 STAND. AREA,SO. IN.         1.00
 302, MILLIG/BUBBLER 1      0.000
 302, MILLIG/BUBBLER 2      0.000
 302, PPM                     0.0

3ULFATE AND 302 EMISSIONS

 NET 3ULFATE,MILLIGRAM/TEST
 NET H230H,MILLIGRAM/TEST
 NET 302,GRAM/TEST
 NET 3ULFATE,HILCIGRAM/KILOMETRE
 NET H230H,MILLIGRAM/KILOMETRE
 NET 302,GRAM/KILOMETRE
                                           12.717
                                           13.0b5
                                            0.000
                                             .585
                                             .518
                                            0.000
                                                       BACKGROUND
                                                           1.00
                                                             70
                                                           0.00
                                                              1
                                                           1.00
                                                           1.00
                                                          0.000
                  1.00
                    70
                  0.00
                     1
                  0.00
                     1
                  1.00
                  1.00
                 0.000
                 0.000
                   0.0
     SULFUR  BALANCE
      FUEL NT.,  2HHO  GRAMS
                SULFUR/GRAMS
                PCT.  RECOVERY
                          SULFUR IN FUEL, .0310 PCT.
                           FUEL      302       H2SOH
                            .7b
0.000
 0.00
.00*3
  .Sb
S02 + H2SOH

    .00*3
      .5b

-------
                                TABLE
UNIT NO.    7
VEHICLE MODEL
      TEST NO.
CHEVY IMPALA
              VEHICLE EMISSION RESULTS
      1975  LIGHT DUTY EMISSIONS TEST
DATE  5/3D/77                     MFGR. CODE
ENGINE   5.7* LITRE 8             CURB WT.
-0
0 KG
YR.
GVM
197b
   0 KG
BAROMETER 7*0.bb MM OF HG.
DRY BULB TEMP.   Z$.b DEC. C
REL. HUMIDITY     57 PCT.

EXHAUST EMISSIONS

     BLOWER DIP. PRESS., G2, 71]. 5 MM.
     BAG RESULTS
                        H20
BAG MO.
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
HC SAMPLE METER READING/SCALE
HC SAMPLE PPM
HC BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
HC BACKGRD PPM
CO SAMPLE METER READING/SCALE
CO SAMPLE PPM
CO BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
CO BACKGRD PPM
C02 SAMPLE METER READING/SCALE
C02 SAMPLE PERCENT
C02 BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
C02 BACKGRD PERCENT
NOX SAMPLE METER READING/SCALE
NOX SAMPLE PPM
1 NOX BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
kJ NOX BACKGRD PPM
302 SAMPLE METER READING/SCALE
S02 SAMPLE PPM
S02 BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
S02 BACKGRD PPM
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
802 CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
1
*0b50
15.5/3
155
1.5/3
15
3b.5/3
872
.7/3
15
*2.2/2
1.85
1.9/2
.07
*0.8/3
122.*
.7/3
2.1
-O.O/*
-0.0
-O.O/*
-0.0
1*2
812
1.80
120. b
0.0
b.2*
71. 9b
C02 MASS GRAMS 2512. 3b
NOX MASS GRAMS
302 MASS GRAMS
WEIGHTED MASS HC .3b GRAMS/KILOMETRE
WEIGHTED MASS CO 3.h? GRAMS/KILOMETRE
WEIGHTED MASS C02 *21.95 GRAMS/KILOMFTRE
WEIGHTED MASS NOX l.*2 GRAMS/KILOMETRE
WEIGHTED MASS 302 O.nO GRAMS/KILOMETRE
18.2*
0.00





                                                       WET BULB TEMP  19.* DEC. C
                                                        AB3. HUMIDITY  11.9 GRAMS/KG
                             BLOWER INLET PRESS., Gl 711.2 MM. H20
                             BLOWER INLET TEMP.   *3 DEG. C
                                                                     Z
                                                                  b9830
                                                                   25.i/a
                                                                     25
                                                                    l.b/3
                                                                     Ib
                                                                   70.9/*
                                                                     b9
                                                                     .*/3
                                                                     9
                                                                   b7.b/3
                                                                   1.22
                                                                    1.1/2
                                                                    .07
                                                                   2*.5/2
                                                                   2*.S
                                                                     .b/3
                                                                    1.8
                                                                   -O.O/*
                                                                   -0.0
                                                                   -O.O/*
                                                                   -0.0

                                                                     11
                                                                     59
                                                                   1.15
                                                                   28.9
                                                                    o.n
                                                                    .80
                                                                   8.92
                                                                2770.31
                                                                   5.9*
                                                                   0.00
                                                                      3
                                                                   H0579
                                                                    *5.b/2
                                                                      *b
                                                                    12.5/2
                                                                      13
                                                                    Bb.7/*
                                                                      87
                                                                     9. Z/*
                                                                       9
                                                                    87.3/3
                                                                    I.b2
                                                                     
-------
           TABLE
ro
i
OJ
O
                        EXHAUST  EMISSIONS  FROM  SINGLE  BAG  SAMPLE
                              VF.HICLE  NUMBER    7
   DATE  S/1C1/77
   MOOEL   197b CHEVY  IMPALA
   DRIVER   SR
   WET BULB TEMP   18  C
   SPKC. HUM.  10. t, GRAM/KG
                         TIMF    -o HR9.
                         SET-7
                         TEST WT.     n KG.
                         OHY BULB TEMP  25 C
                         BA.RO.  7f0.7 MM  HG.
        TEST NO.  2
        ENGINE 5.7 LITREV 8
        GVM    0 KG
        REL. HUM.  52.5 PCT
        MEASURED FUEL  0.00 KG
     RUN DURATION
     BLOWER INLET PRESS.
     RLOWER DIF.  PRESS.
     BLOWER INLET TEMP.
     DYNO REVOLUTIONS
     BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
     BLOWER CU. CM /REV.
                     23.2B MINUTES
                    711.2  MM. H20
                    711.?  MM  H20
                       t3  DEC. C
                     1122b3
                     2530
                  METF.R READING/SCALE
                  PPM
          BACKGRD METF.R READING/SCALE
          BACKGRD PPM
          SAMPLE  METER READING/SCALE
          SAMPLE  PPM
          BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
RAG RESULTS
 HC  SAMPLE
 HC  SAMPLE
 HC
 HC
 CO
 CO
 CO
 CO  BACKGRO PPM
 C02 SAMPLE  METER READING/SCALE
 C02 SAMPLE  PERCENT
 CO? BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
 CO? BACKGRD PERCENT
 NOX SAMPLE  METER READING/SCALE
 NOX SAMPLE  PPM
 NOX BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
 NOX RACKGRD PPM
     CONCENTRATION PPM
     CONCENTRATION PPM
 C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
 NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
 S02 COCENTRATION PPM
     MASS (GRAMS)
     MASS (GRAMS)
      HC
      CO
      HC
      CO
      C02 MASS (GRAMS)
      NOX MASS (GRAMS)
      302 MASS (GRAMS)
     2H
   13.8/2
     1H
   54. 5/*
   12. I/*
     23
   H5.1/2
   2.01
    1.9/2
    .07
   bl.b/2
   bl.b
    1.2/2
    1.2
     12
     93
   1.95
   bO.b
   0.0
   1.50
  22.80
7510.53
  ?1.28
   0.00
   HC  GRAMS/KILOMETRE      .07
   CO  GRAMS/KILOMETRE     l.OH
   CO? GRAMS/KILOMETRE   3H3
   NOX GRAMS/KILOMETRE     1.11
   302 GRAMS/KILOMETRE     0.0(1

   HC  GRAMS/KG OF FUEL    .b3
   CO  GRAMS/KG OF FUFL    9.5
   CO? GRAMS/KG OF FUEL   315?
   NOX GRAMS/KG OF FUEL  10.15
   SO2 GRAMS/KG OF FUFL   O.On
   CARBON BALANCE FUEL ECONOMY =
                              HC  GRAMS/MIN    .Ob
                              CO  GRAHS/MIN    1.0
                              coa GRAMS/MIN    32*
                              NOX GRAMS/MIN   1.04
                              S02 GRAMS/MIN   0.00
                              l».7b LITRES PER HUNDRED KILOMETERS

-------
           TABLE
                        EXHAUST EMISSIONS FROM SINGLE BAG SAMPLE
                              VEHICLE NUMBER   7
td

LO
    DATE  5/30/77              TIME    -0 MRS.        TEST NO.  2
    MODEL  n?b CHEVY IMPALA   SFT-7                  ENGINE 5.7 LITREO
    RUN DURATION   S3.28 MIN.  DISTANCE DRIVEN  21.1b KILOMETRES
    CVS BLOWER TEST VOL.  250.38 ACT. CU. METRES
                           SAMPLE
SULFATE DATA .              	

 FILTER NO.              H7FH-28SO
 SAMPLE VOL. CU. FT.        13.73
 SAMPLE TEMP. DEC. F           81
 SAMPLE AREA SO. IN.     blDlb.OO
 DILUTION FACTOR                 1
 STAND. DEN. MICROG/ML       5.On
 STAND. AREA SO. IN.    19397^.00
 SOt,MICR06/FILTER         15.758

SULFUR DIOXIDE  DATA

 SAMPLE VOL. CU. FT.         l.Ofl
 SAMPLE TEMP. OEG. F           7(1
 AREA,BUBBLER 1              O.OU
 OIL. FACT.,BUBBLER 1            I
 AREA,BUBBLER 2              Ci.dO
 OIL. FACT.,BUBBLER S            1
 STAND. DEN. MICROG/ML       1.00
 STAND. AREA,SQ. IN.         1.00
 302, MILLIG/BUBBLER  1      0.000
 sos, MILLIG/BUBBLER  2      o.ooo
 sos, PPM                      o.o

SULFATE AND  SOS EMISSIONS

 NET  SULFATE,MILLIGRAM/TEST
 NET  H2SOt,MILLIGRAM/TEST
 NET  302,GRAM/TEST
 NF.T  SULFATE, MILLIGRAM/KILOMETRE
 NET  HSSOH,MILLIGRAM/KILOMETRE
 NET  302,GRAM/KILOMETRE
                                           11.H92
                                           11.733
                                            n.ooo
                                             .533
                                            0.000
                                                      BACKGROUND
                                                          1.00
                                                            70
                                                          0.00
                                                              1
                                                          1.00
                                                          1.00
                                                         0.000
       1.00
         70
       0.00
          1
       0.00
          1
       1.00
       1.00
      0.000
      0.000
        0.0
    SULFUR BALANCE
     FUEL WT.,  S312  GRAMS
                SULFUR,GRAMS
                PCT.  RECOVERY
                           SULFUR  IN  FUEL,  .0310  PCT.
                            FUEL       302       H2SOt
                                     o. n n o
                                      o.oo
.0038
  .52
S02 t H3S04

    .0038
      .52

-------
                                TABLE
UNIT NO.  9S2
VEHICLE MODEL
      TEST NO. 1
CHEVY IMPALA
BAROMETER 739.39 MM OF HG.
DRY BULR TEMP.   22.8 DEC.  C
REL. HUMIDITY     73 PCT.
EXHAUST EMISSIONS
     RLOWER DIF. PRESS., G2,  711.2  MM.
     RAR RESULTS
              VEHICLE EMISSION RESULTS
      1975  LIGHT DUTY EMISSIONS TEST
DATE  (,/ 2/77                     MFGR. CODE   -fl
ENGINE   5.7H LITRE 8             CURB WT.     n KG

                             WET BULB TEMP  19. <» DEC. C
                              ABS. HUMIDITY  13.1 URAMS/KG
                                                                                                            YR.
                                                                                                            GVM
I97b
   0 KG
                                        H20
RAG NO.
RLOWER REVOLUTIONS
HC SAMPLE METER READING/SCALE
HC SAMPLE PPM
HC BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
HC RACKGRO PPM
CO SAMPLE METER RF ADTNG/3C ALE
CO SAMPLE PPM
CO BACKGKD MFTER READING/SCALE
CO BACKGRO PPM
C02 SAMPLE METER READING/SCALE
C02 SAMPLE PERCENT
CO? BACKGRD METFR RE AD TNG/SCALE
CO? BACKGHD PERCENT
NOX SAMPLE METER READING/SCALE
NOX SAMPLE PPM
NOX BACKGHD METER READING/SCALE
NOX BACKGRD PPM
SO? SAMPLE METER READING/SCALE
SO? SAMPLE PPM
SO? BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
SO? BACKGRD PPM
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
S02 CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
co MASS GRAMS
i
HObSB
in.b/3
lOb
1.8/3
1R
81. I/*
371
l.H/*
t
•»?.5/?
1.87
1.5/?
.05
39.3/3
117.9
.*/3
1.2
-O.O/*
-o.n
-n.o/*
-o.n
91
3th
1.82
lib. 9
o.n
3.97
30.58
CO? MASS GRAMS ?5H7.b?
NOX MASS GRAMS
SO? MASS GRAMS
WEIGHTED MASS HC ,?B GRAMS/KILOMETRE
WEIGHTED MASS CO 1.28 GRAMS/K I LOMETRE
WEIGHTED MASS C02 "U1.7S GRAMS/KILOMETRE
WEIGHTED MASS NOX 2.09 GHAMS/KILOMFTRE
WEIGHTED MASS so? n.nn GRAMS/KILOMFTRE
18. 42
n.on





                                                        BLOWER  INLET  PRESS.,  Gl  711.2 MM.  H20
                                                        BLOWER  INLET  TEMP.    t3  DF.G.  C
                                                                     2
                                                                  b9812
                                                                   22.9/2
                                                                     23
                                                                    l.h/3
                                                                     Ih
                                                                    b.S/*
                                                                     b
                                                                    l.l/*
                                                                     3
                                                                   b5.3/3
                                                                   1.17
                                                                    l.b/2
                                                                    .Ob
                                                                   «»9.3/2
                                                                   H9.3
                                                                     .5/3
                                                                    1.5
                                                                   -o.n/*
                                                                   -0.0
                                                                   -o.o/*
                                                                   -0.0

                                                                     8
                                                                     3
                                                                   1.12
                                                                   t?.9
                                                                    o.n
                                                                    ,b2
                                                                    .•*8
                                                                2b7b.l9
                                                                  12.97
                                                                   0.00
                                                                       3
                                                                    »n735
                                                                     5b.5/2
                                                                       5b
                                                                       If
                                                                     Hl.b/*
                                                                       39
                                                                      2.3/*
                                                                        2
                                                                     83.5/3
                                                                     1.5*
                                                                      3.0/3
                                                                      .05
                                                                     fl.2/2
                                                                     H9.2
                                                                       .8/2
                                                                       .8
                                                                     -O.O/*
                                                                     -0.0
                                                                     -O.O/*
                                                                     -0.0
                                                                       35
                                                                     i.sn
                                                                     t8.5
                                                                      n.o
                                                                     1.9t
                                                                     3.10
                                                                  2101.08
                                                                     7.bb
                                                                     0.00
     FUEL ECONOMY BY CARBON BALANCE =   5.7  KILOMETRE/LITRE

-------
       TABLE
                    EXHAUST EMISSIONS FROM SINGLE BAG SAMPLE
                          VEHICLE NUMBER 95?
DATE  b/ a/77
MODEL  197b CHEVY IMPALA
DRIVER   SR
WET 9ULB TEMP  18 C
SPEC. HUM.  10.a GRAM/KG
     TIME    -0 HRS.
     SET-7
     TEST WT.   aab? KG.
     DRY BULB  TEMP  at C
     BARO.  739.9 MM   HG.
                                                       TEST MO.  a
                                                       ENGINE 5.7 LITREV B
                                                       GVW    0 KG
                                                       REL. HUM.  sa.O PCT
                                                       MEASURED FUEL  0.00 KG
  RUN DURATION
  BLOWER INLET PRESS.
  BLOWER DIF.  PRESS.
  BLOWER INLET TEMP.
  DYNO REVOLUTIONS
  BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
  BLOWER CU. CM /REV.
 as.as MINUTES
711.a  MM. Hao
711.a  MM
       DEC. C
 3230
               METER READING/SCALE
               PPM
       BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
       BACKGRD PPM
       SAMPLE  METER READING/SCALE
       SAMPLE  PPM
       BACKGRO METER READING/SCALE
       BAG RESULTS
        HC  SAMPLE
        HC  SAMPLE
        HC
        HC
        CO
        CO
        CO
        CO  BACKGRD PPM
        COa SAMPLE  METER READING/SCALE
        COa SAMPLE  PERCENT
tfl       COa BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
I        COa BACKGRD PERCENT
w       NOX SAMPLE  METER READING/SCALE
        NOX SAMPLE  PPM
        NOX BACKGRO METER READING/SCALE
        NOX BACKGRD PPM
            CONCENTRATION PPM
            CONCENTRATION PPM
        COa CONCENTRATION PCT
        NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
        SOa COCENTRATION PPM
            MASS (GRAMS)
            MASS (GRAMS)
   HC
   CO
   HC
   CO
   COa MASS (GRAMS)
   NOX MASS (GRAMS)
   SOa MASS (PRAMS)

HC  GRAMS/KILOMETRE      .11
CO  GRAMS/KILOMETRE      .19
coa GRAMS/KILOMETRE   ato
NOX GRAMS/KILOMETRE     1.H7
SOa GRAMS/KILOMETRE     0.00

HC  GRAMS/KG OF FUEL   1.01
CO  GRAMS/KG OF FUEL    1.7
COa GRAMS/KG OF FUEL   31b3
NOX GRAMS/KG OF FUEL  13.71
SOa GRAMS/KG OF FUEL   O.Ofl
                       3i.3/a
                         31
                       13. a/a
                         it
                       ao.9/*
                         ao
                        a.*/*
                          a
                       tt.s/a
                       1.97
                        i.7/a
                        .Ob
                       sa.a/a
                       Ba.a
                        i.a/a
                        i.a
                         ao
                         17
                       1.91
                       8i. a
                       0.0
                       a. 37
                       t.05
                       0.00
          HC  GRAMS/MIN    .10
          CO  GRAMS/MIN     .3
          COa GRAMS/MIN    318
          NOX GRAMS/MIN   1.39
          sne GRAMS/MIN   o.on
CARBON BALANCE FUEL ECONOMY =   It.57 LITRES PER HUNDRED KILOMETERS

-------
            TABLE
                         EXHAUST EMISSIONS FROM  SINGLE  BAT,  SAMPLE
                               VEHICLE NUMBER  152
     DATE  b/ 2/77              Tint    -0 HRS.         TF3T  NO.   2
     MODEL  197b CHFVY IMPALA   SET-7                   ENGINE  5.7 LITREO
     RUN DURATION   P3.21 MTN.  DISTANCE DRIVEN   21.74  KILOMETRES
     CVS BLUWFR TEST VOL.  250.h5 ACT. CU. METRES
LO
£>•
SULFATE PATA

 FILTER NO.
 SAMPLE VOL. CU. FT.
 SAMPLE TEMP. DEC. F
 SAMPLE AREA SQ. IN.
 DILUTION FACTOR
 STAND. DEN. MICROG/ML
 STAND. AREA SO. IN.
 SOH.MICROG/FILTER

SUIFUR DIOXIDE DATA

 SAMPLE VOL. CU. FT.
 SAMPLE TEMP. DEC. F
 AREA,BUBBLER 1
 DTL.  FACT.,BUBBLER J
 AREA,BUBBLER 2
 OIL.  FACT..BUBBLER 2
 STAND. DEN. HlCROG/ML
 STAND. AREA,SO. IN.
 so2,  MILLIG/BUBBLER i
 302,  MILLIG/BUBBLER 2
 302,  PPM
                                SAMPLE
                              H7FH-2B23
                                 1H.R2
                                    H2
                             259903.00
                                    10
                                 20.00
                             203708.00
                              2551.721
 1.00
   70
 0.00
    1
 0.00
    1
 1.00
 1.00
0.000
0.000
  0.0
                                                        BACKGROUND
                           I .00
                             70
                           0.00
                             1
                           1 .00
                           1 .00
                         0.000
 1 .00
   70
 0.00
    1
 0.00
    1
 1 .00
 1.00
0.000
0.000
  0.0
     SULFATE AND S02 EMISSIONS

      NFT SULFATE,MILLIGRAM/TEST         1713.b!5
      NET H2SO>», MILLIGRAM/TEST           O'H.bOl
      NET so2,GRAM/TEST                     o.ooo
      NET SULFATF,MILLIGRAM/KILOMETRE      78.832
      NFT H2SOH,MILLIGRAM/KILOMETRE        RO.ffl?
      NET S02,GRAM/KILOMETRE                0.000
     SULFUR BALANCE
      FUEL  WT.,  2338 GRAMS
                SULFUR,GRAMS
                PCT.  RECOVERY
                          SULFUR IN FUEL,  .0310 PCT.
                           FUEL      S02       H2SOH
                            .72
        o.noo
         0.00
                                                                S02
                                                     .5721
                                                                      HSSO*
                                                                    .5721

-------
                                TAHLF
UNIT NO.  952
VEHICLE MODEL
      TEST NO. 1
CHEVY IMPALA
BAROMETER 742.711 MM OF HG.
DRY BULB TEMP.   23.9 DEC. C
REL. HUMIDITY     bb PCT.

EXHAUST EMISSIONS

     BLOWER DIE. PRESS., G2,  b9R.5  MM.
     RAG RESULTS
     RAG NO.
     RLOWER REVOLUTIONS
              VEHICLE EMISSION RESULTS
      1175  LIGHT DUTY EMISSIONS TEST
DATE  b/ b/77                     MFGR. CODE   -0
ENGINF   5.7* LITRE B             CURB WT.     0 KG

                             WET BULB TEMP  19. f DEC. C
                              4BS. HUMIDITY  12.b GRAMS/KG
                                                                                                            YR.  197b
                                                                                                            GVM     0 KG
ro
                                        H20
HC SAMPLE METER
HC SAMPLE PPM
HC BACKGRD METER
HC BACKGRD PPM
CO SAMPLE METER
CO SAMPLE PPM
CO BACKGRD METER
CO RACKGRD PPM
C02 SAMPLK METER
READING/SCALE

READING/SCALE

READING/SCALE

READING/SCALE

READING/SCALE
C02 SAMPLE PERCENT
CO? BACKGRD METER
READING/SCALE
CO? BACKGRO PERCENT
NOX SAMPLE METER
NOX SAMPLE PPM
NOX BACKGRD METER
NOX RACKGHD PPM
SO? SAMPLE METER
SO? SAMPLE PPM
SO? BACKGRD METER
SO? BACKGRD PPM
HC CONCENTRATION
CO CONCENTRATION
CO? CONCENTRATION
NOX CONCENTRATION
SO? CONCENTRATION
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
CO? MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
S03 MASS GRAMS
WEIGHTED MASS HC
WEIGHTED MASS CO
WEIGHTED MASS C02
WEIGHTED MASS NOX
WEIGHTED MASS SO?
READING/SCALE

READING/SCALE

READING/SCALE

READING/SCALE

PPM
PPM
PCT
PPM
PPM


11.3/3
113
1.9/3
19
hl.7/*
2H9
1.9/*
3
97.H/3
1.R3
3.9/3
.Ob
H3.8/3
131. H
.3/3
. q
-o.n/*
o.n
-o.n/*
o.n
97
232
1.78
130. b
0.0
H.27
20. b7
25ns. in


.38 GRAMS/KILOMETRE
i.ii? GRAMS/KILOMETRE
H08.77 GRAMS/KILOMETRE
j.bn GRAMS/KILOMFTRF
O.nO GRAMS/KILOMFTRE
2n.35
n.no





                                                       BLOWER  INLET  PRESS.,  Gl  b98.5  MM.  H20
                                                       BLOWER  INLET  TEMP.    t3  DEG.  C
                                                                     2
                                                                  b9879
                                                                   2b.l/2
                                                                     2h
                                                                    1.7/3
                                                                     17
                                                                    B.b/*
                                                                      8
                                                                     .9/*
                                                                      3
                                                                   b5.B/3
                                                                   1.18
                                                                    t.3/3
                                                                    .07
                                                                   2*. 5
                                                                     .3/3
                                                                     .9
                                                                   -o.n/*
                                                                    o.o
                                                                   -o.n/*
                                                                    o.n

                                                                     11
                                                                      5
                                                                   1.12
                                                                   23.7
                                                                    o.n
                                                                    .80
                                                                    .Bt
                                                                2703. 3h
                                                                   b.33
                                                                   o.nn
                                                                     89.5/2
                                                                       89
                                                                     13.b/2
                                                                       It
                                                                     59.S/*
                                                                       57
                                                                      3.8/*
                                                                        t
                                                                     HI. 1/3
                                                                     I.t9
                                                                      » .3/3
                                                                      .07
                                                                     tfl.b/2
                                                                     HB.b
                                                                       .9/2
                                                                       .9
                                                                     -O.O/*
                                                                      0.0
                                                                     -O.O/*
                                                                      0.0

                                                                       77
                                                                       51
                                                                     1.H3
                                                                     t7.8
                                                                      0.0
                                                                     3.H2
                                                                     t.58
                                                                 2019.20
                                                                     7.t5
                                                                     o.nn
     FUEL ECONOMY  BY  CARBON  BALANCE  =    5.7   KILOMETRE/LITRE

-------
        TARLF
                     EXHAUST FMISSIflNS FROM SINGLE  HAG  SAMPLE
                           VEHICLF NUMBFR
 DATE   b /  h / 7 7
 Monri.   ii'h  CHEVY IMPALA
 DRI VFR    SR
 WET  RIILB  TFMP  iq c
 SPFC.  HUH.   u.i  GRAM/KG
     TIME    -n MRS.
     SFT-7
     TEST WT.  ??b? KG.
     DRY BULB TEMP  ?h C
     BARO.  7H?.t MM  HG.
TEST NO.  ?.
ENGINE 5.7 LITREV 8
GVW    0 KG
REL. HUM.  53.0 PCT
MEASURED FUEL  0.00 KG
   RUN  DURATION
   RLOWEH  INLET PRESS.
   RLOWFR  OIF.   PRESS.
   RLOWER  INLFT TEMP.
   OYNO REVOLUTIONS
   RLOWER  REVOLUTIONS
   RLOWER  CD.  CM /REV.
 ?3.?1 MINUTES
7M.?  MM. H?0
711.?  MM  H?0
   43  PEG. C
31HSO
 1J ?5?5
RAG
HC
HC
HC
HC
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO?
CO?
CD ' CO?
1 CO?
*
                                                .q
                                                13
                                                1?
                                               1.7/*
                                              1.9S
                                               1.1/2
                                               .07
                                              81. 3/?
                                              81.3
                                               1. 3/?
                                               1.3
                                                13
                                                in
                                              1.B1
                                              80.?
                                              n.n
                                              1.51
                                              a.3b
                                           73?5.bn
                                             3?. 71
                                              n.nn
          HC   GRAMS/MIN    .n?
          CO   GRAMS/MIN     .1
          CO?  GRAMS/MIN    ?!•*
          NOX  GRAMS/MTN   1.11
          PO?  GRAM3/MIN   n.nn
CARBON RALAMCE  FLIEL  ECONOMY  =   1H.H? LITRES PER HUNDRED KILOMETERS

-------
            TABLE
tfl
l
                         EXHAUST EMISSIONS FROM SINGLE BAG SAMPLE
                               VEHICLE NUMBER 153
     DATE   b/  b/77              TTMh    -n HR3.        TEST NO.  ?
     MODEL   117b CHEVY IMPALA   SET-7                  ENGINE 5.7 LITREO
     RUN  DURATION   23.29 MIN.  DISTANCE DRIVEN  21.71* KILOMETRES
     CVS  BLOWER TEST VOL.  251.HO ACT. CU. METRES
                           SAMPLE
SULFATE DATA               	

 FILTER NO.              t7FH-2f?2b
 SAMPLE VOL. CU. FT.         13.I*
 SAMPLE TF^IP. DEG. F            8?
 SAMPLE AREA SO. IN.    17B3in.nn
 DILUTION FACTOR                10
 STAND. DEN. MICROG/ML       20.00
 STAND. AREA SO. IN.    205157.00
 SO<*,MICROG/FILTER       1739.278

SULFUR DIOXIDE  DATA

 SAMPLE VOL. cu. FT.          i.nn
 SAMPLE TEMP. DEG. F            70
 AREA,BUBBLER 1               O.OP
 OIL.  FACT.,BUBBLER  1            1
 AREA,BUBBLER 2               0.00
 OIL.  FACT.,BUBBLER  2            1
 STAND. DEN. MICROG/ML        1.00
 STAND. AREA,SO. IN.          1.00
 S02,  MILLIG/PUBBLER  1       0.000
 so2,  MILLIG/RUBBLER  2       o.ooo
 S02,  PPM                      0.0

SULFATE AND  302 EMISSIONS

 NET SULFATE,MILLIGRAM/TEST
 NET H2SOt,MILLIGRAM/TEST
 NET S02,GRAM/TEST
 NFT SULFATE,MILLIGRAM/KILOMETRE
 NET H2SOH,MILLIGRAM/KILOMETRE
 NFT 302,GRAM/KILOMETRE
     SULFUR BALANCE
      FUEL WT., 231H GRAMS
                SULFUR,GRAMS
                PCT. RECOVERY
                                         132b.233
                                            o.ono
                                           hi. Oil
                                            0.000
                                                       BACKGROUND
                                                           1.00
                                                             70
                                                           o.on
                                                              1
                                                           1.00
                                                           1.00
                                                          0.000
                  1.00
                    70
                  0.00
                     1
                  0.00
                     1
                  1.00
                  1.00
                 0.000
                 0.000
                   0.0
                           SULFUR  IN  FUEL,  .0310  PCT.
                            FUEL       S02       H2SO^
                             .72
O.OOO
 0.00
                                                bl.72
S02 + H2SOH

    .ft28
    bl.72

-------
                APPENDIX C

            COMPUTER  PRINTOUTS
                    FOR
      HIGH TEMPERATURE  EXHAUST  SYSTEM
DEVELOPMENT TESTS ON  A  1975  CHEVROLET NOVA
      (Tests in Chronological Order)

-------
U.'JIT MO.    S         TEST  NO.
VFHICLF MODEL  NOVA  CHFVUOLtT
          RARl)Mf TFR  7M1.17 MH (IF HG.
          ORv  *IILH  TFMP.    ?5.b DFT, . c
          REl.  HUMIDITY      bH  PTT.
                      TAMLF                    VEHICLE EMISSION  RESULTS
                                      1175  Llr,HT UUTY EMISSIONS  TF.ST
                                HATE  5/13/77                      MFCS.
                                ENGINE   5.7t LITRf                CURB
                                                                              CODE
                                                                             WT.
                                                                                                    -it
                                                                                                    n
                                                                                                    YR.
                                                                                                    I. VH
                                                                                                                             1 S ;
                                                                   WFT BULB TEMP  ?0.b OEG. C
                                                                    ABS.  HUMIDITY  13. H GRAMS/KG
n
I
to
          EXHAUST  EMISSIONS

               BLOWER  DIF.  PRESS.,
               RAT,  RESULTS
               RAT,  NO.
               HLOWER  REVOLUTIONS
                     G?,  711.8 MM. H?0
                                                             RLUWER  INLET  PRFSS.,  GI 711.2 MM. H?U
                                                             HLOWER  IMLET  TFMP.    4? OFG. C
               HC
               HC
               HC
               HC
               en
               en
               ru
               ro
               CO?
               CO?
COP
NOX
NOX
NOX
NOX
SO?
30?
SO?
so?

HC
CO
CO?
NOX
so?
HC
CO
ro?
NOX
SO?
SAMPLE  MFTFW READING/SCALE
SAMPLF  PPM
OACKGRD MfTF.R READING/SCALE
BACKr,RO PPM
SAMPLE  METER READING/SCALE
SAMPLE  PPM
BACKGRD MFTER READTNG/SCALE
BACKGNO PPM
SAMPLE  MFTFR READING/SCALE
SAMPLE  PERCENT
BACKGHO MFTFR READING/SCALE
BACKfiRf) PFHCENT
        MFTFR RFAOING/SCALE
        PPM
SAMPLE
SAMPLE
flACKGHD METFR RF ADING/SC ALE
BACKGRD PPM
SAMPLE
SAMPLE
                             METFR  READING/SCALE
                             PPM
                    BACKRHD  METF.H  READING/SCALE
                    HACKGNO  PPM

                    CONCENTRATION  PPM
                    CONCENTRATION  PPM
                    CONCENTRATION  PCT
                    CONCENTRATION  PPM
                    CONCENTRATION  PPM
                    MASS GRAMS
                    MASS GRAMS
                    MASS GRAMS
                    MAS3 GRAMS
                    MASS GRAMS
                                                1
                                             in.h/3
                                              ntb
                                              l.t/3
                                                14
                                             73. R/*
                                              3?1
                                                ,5/*
                                                1
                                                   1.7/2
                                                   .nb
                                                  52. 7/2
                                                  52.7
                                                    .7/2
                                                    . 7
                                                  -n.n/*
                                                  -n.n
                                                  -n.o/*
                                                  -n.o
                                         3H2
                                        1.79
                                        52.1
                                         n.n
                                        •». 13
                                       2b.77
                                        8. 32
                                        n. nn
20.5/P
  20
 1.3/3
  1 3
?_ •* . t /*
  27
  ,3/*
   1
27.1/2
1. 11
 1.3/2
 .(15
12.1/2
12.1
  .7/2
  .7
-n.il/*
-o.n
-n.n/*
-u.o
                                                           25
                                                         l.nb
                                                         11.5
                                                          0.0
                                                          .b5
                                                         3. 88
                                                      2558.33
                                                         3. If
                                                         n.no
                                                                           35.2/2
                                                                             35
                                                                           27.1/2
                                                                             27
                                                                           HH . 8/*
                                                                             » 2
                                                                             .7/*
                                                                              I
                                                                           3b. 7/2
                                                                           I. ^7
                                                                            l.b/2
                                                                            .Ob
   PR.b
     .b/2
     .b
   -O.O/*
   -n.o
   -o.o/*
   -n.o

     ) i
     9S
   1.52
   ?R.l
    n.o
    .50
   3.50
2133.37
   Y. H
-------
                                TABLE
                                             EXHAUST EMISSIONS FROM SINGLE BAG SAMPLE
                                                   VEHICLE NUMBER   1
                        DATE  5
                        MODEL  1175  NOVA  CHEVY
                        DRIVER   S'H
                        WET BULR TFMP   JIM C
                        SPEC. HUM.   U.l  GRAM/KG
                          UME     -0  MRS.
                          SET-7
                          TEST WT.   1R1H  KG.
                          DRY BULB  TEMP   ?7  C
                          BARO.   7H1.?  MM   HG.
                          PUN DURATION
                          HLOWER  INLKT  F'RFSS.
                          BLOWER  DIE.   PRESS.
                          BLOWER  INLET  TEMP.
                          HYNO REVOLUTIONS
                          BLOWER  REVOLUTIONS
                          RLOWER  CU.  CM /REV.
                     23.3? MINUTFS
                    711.a  MM.  H?0
                           MM   H?0
                    711.?
                       H?
                    31b03
                      112380
                      22?8
DEC. C
                     TEST  NO.   ?
                     ENGINE  5.7 LITREV  8
                     GVW     0  KG
                     REL.  HUM.  tfi.2  PCT
                     MEASURED  FUEL   n.OM  KG
O
 I
U>
                                        METER READING/SCALE
                                        PPM
                                BACKGRO  METER READING/SCALE
                                BACKGRO  PPM
                                SAMPLE   MFTER READING/SCALE
                                SAMPLE   PPM
                                BACKGHD  METER READING/SCALE
BAG RESULTS
 HC  SAMPLE
 HC  SAMPLE
 HC
 HC
 CO
 CO
 CO
 CO  BACKGRD PPM
 C02 SAMPLE  METER READING/SCALE
 CO? SAMPLE  PERCENT
 CO? BACKGPD METER READING/SCALE
 CO? 8ACKGRD PERCENT
             METER READING/SCALE
             PPM
 NOX BACKGRU METER READING/SCALE
 NOX BACKGRD PPM
 HC  CONCENTRATION PPM
 CD  CONCENTRATION PPM
 CO? CONCENTRATION PCT
 NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
 SO? COCENTRATION PPM
     MASS  (GRAMS)
     MASS  (GRAMS)
                            NOX  SAMPLE
                            NOX  SAMPLE
                            HC
                            CO
                            CO?  MASS  (GRAMS)
                            NOX  MASS  (GRAMS)
                            SO?  MASS  (GRAMS)

                         HC   GRAMR/KILOMHRE       .03
                         CO   GRAMS/KILOMFTRE       .?3
                         co?  GRAMS/KILOMETRE    3?s
                         NOX  GRAMS/KILOMETRE       .m
                         SO?  GRAMS/KILOMfTKE      0.00

                         HC   GRAMS/KG OF FUEL    .3?
                         co   GRAMS/KG OF FUEL    ?.?
                         CO?  GRAMS/KG OF FUEL   3LK5
                         NOX  GRAMS/KG OF FUEL   7.R5
                         SO?  GRAMS/KG OF FUEL   fl.no
                         CARBON  BALANCE  FUEL  ECONOMY =
                35.
                  35
                3t.5
                  3H
                  an
                 I.?/*
                   1
                f 3.0/2
                1.10
                 l.B/2
                 .07
                   .7/2
                   .7
                   t,
                   ?0
                1.8H
                H3.3
                O.ll
                 .7?
                t.qq
             7133.2?
               17. bl
                o.on
                               HC   GRAMS/MIN    .03
                               CO   GRAMS/MIN     .?
                               cog  GRAMS/MIN    sob
                               NOX  GRAMS/MIN    ,7b
                               SO?  GRAMS/MIN   0.00
                               It.05  LITRES PER HUNDRED KILOMETERS

-------
                                TAHIF
                                             tXHAUST EMISSIONS FROM SINGLF RAG RAHPIE
                                                   VtHICLF  NUMHFR   1
                        04TE   5/13/77               TIMF    -n MRS.        TEST NO.   8
                        MIIDFL   I'm  NOVA  CHEVY      SfcT-7                  ENGINE 5.7 LITREO
                        HUM DURATION    ??.3?  MIN.   DISTANCE DRIVEN  ai.?t KILQHETRFS
                        cvs HLUHLH  HST  V
-------
           UNIT  Mf).     q
           VEHTCI F  MOOf L
      TEST MM.
NOVA CHEW
                                                         VEHICLE  EMISSION RESULTS
                                                 1175   Llr;HT  DUTY EMISSIONS TEST
                                          ('ATE   b/JO/77                      MFGR. CODE
                                          ENGINE    5.7H  LITRE  H              CURB WT.
-D
0 KG
YR.
GVM
1175
   a KG
           BAWOMFTFR  7M.93  MM HE HP,.
           DRY HHLH TFMP.    5.1.3 [)FG. C
           PEL. HUMIDITY      hh PCT.
o
i
Ln
EXHAUST EMISSIONS

     BLOWER DIE.
         RESULTS
                             PRESS., G?. bSS.B MM.  H?.0
MAG NO.
HLOWER hFVtlLUT JONS
HC SAMPLE MFTFR REAOTNG/SCALE
HC SAMPLE PPM
HC BAC.KGHO MEIFR READING/SCALP
HC HAC.KGHO PPM
TO SAMPLE MFTFR REAOI NG/SC ALE
TO SAMPLE f'PM
TO RACKRRD MFTFR REAOTNG/SCALE
CO BACKRRD PPM
ro? SAMPLE HFTER READING/SCALE
CO? SAMPLE PFPCENT
CO? BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
CO? BACKRRD PFRCENT
MOX SAMPLE METFR READING/SCALE
MOX SAMPLF PPM
NOX BACKRRD METER READING/SCALE
NOX BACKRRD PPM
SO? SAMPLE MFTER READING/SCALE
SO? SAMPLE PPM
SO? BACKRRD MFTER READING/SCALE
SO? HACKGRO PPM
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
CO? CONCENTRATION Pf.T
MOX CONCENTRATION PPM
Sfl? CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
TO MASS GRAMS
i
lObht
lb.5/3
Ib5
1.8/}
18
75. 8/*
331
1.5/*
13
15.2/2
2.02
2.1/2
.08
b3.0/2
b3.0
.8/2
.q
-o.n/*
-n.o
-n.o/*
-0.0
ISO
303
J .15
b2.3
0.0
b.M
27.01
CO? MASS GRAMS 27«tb.01
NOX MASS GRAMS
SO? MASS GRAMS
WEIGHTED MASS HC .31 GRAMS/KILOMETRE
WFTRHTFD MASS CO 1.7? GkAMS/K H.OMFTRE
WFIRHTFD MASS en? 437.10 GF;AMS/KILOMFTRE
WFIGHTFO MASS NOX .77 GPAMS/KILOMETRE
WEIGHTED MASS so? n.no GRAMS/KILOMETRE
1.55
n.no





                                                         WET  BULB  TEMP  18.1 OEG. C
                                                          AB3.  HUMIDITY  12.1 GRAKS/KG
                                                         BLOWER  INLET PRE33., Gl BBS.8 MM.  H20
                                                         BLOWER  INLF.T TEMP.   13 OEG. C
                                                      2
                                                   blbBl
                                                    21.1/2
                                                      2?
                                                     1.8/3
                                                      1H
                                                    43. b/*
                                                      1).
                                                     H.I/*
                                                      12
                                                    bb.b/3
                                                    1.20
                                                     1.8/2
                                                     .07
                                                    12.1/2
                                                    12.1
                                                      .7/2
                                                      .7
                                                    -o.n/*
                                                    -o.n
                                                    -o.o/*
                                                    -o.o

                                                       b
                                                      28
                                                    1.11
                                                    12.3
                                                     0.0
                                                     .H2
                                                    H.31
                                                 2738.75
                                                    3.22
                                                    0.00
                                                                                        3
                                                                                    H0b7b
                                                                                     53.2/2
                                                                                        S3
                                                                                     22.1/2
                                                                                        22
                                                                                     51. H/*
                                                                                      111
                                                                                     11. B/*
                                                                                        ] 1
                                                                                     12.8/3
                                                                                     1 .71
                                                                                      3.b/3
                                                                                      .Ob
                                                                                     23.5/2
                                                                                     23.5
                                                                                        .5/2
                                                                                        .5
                                                                                     -O.O/*
                                                                                     -0.0
                                                                                     -O.O/*
                                                                                     -0.0
                                                                                                   15
                                                                                                 l.bl
                                                                                                 23.1
                                                                                                  0.0
                                                                                                 1.50
                                                                                                 8.51
                                                                                             2377.10
                                                                                                 3.53
                                                                                                 o.no
                 FUEL FCONllMY PY CARBON BALANCE  =    5.3   KILOMETRE/LITRE

-------
                                                     EMISSIONS  FROM  SINGLE  P»G SAMPLE
                                                   VEHICLE NUMBFR    q
                        OATF   h/lfl/77               TIME    -Cl  HRS.
                        "OOEI   1975  NOVA CHEW EM-qSET-7
                        DRTVF^    RP                 TEST WT.   IR1H  KG.
                        WFT  flMLP  TFMP   19 (         DRY BULB  TpMP   ?h  C
                        SPFC.  HUM.   in.<4 r.pAM/Kr,   BAHO.   7t?.9 MM   HG.
                      TEST  NO.   8
                      ENGINE 5.7 LITREV 8
                      GVW     o  KG
                      REL.  HUM.   HR.f, PCT
                      MEASURED  FUEL  o.on KG
                          RUM
                          RLOWEH  INI.FT  PPFSS.
                          RLOWFP  OIF.   PRF.SS.
                          BLOWER  INLFT  TFMP.
                          HYNP  WF v/OL"T IONS
                     71 J .8
                     7)1.8
                        "»3
                        -n
                      1)
MINUTES
MM. H?0
MM  H?0
DEG. C
                          PLOWFP  C'J.  CM
o
RAG
 HC
 HC
 HC
 HC

 CO
 CO
 cn
 CO?
 cn?
 CO?
 CO?
 NOX
 NOX
 NOX
 NOX
 HC

 CO?
 NOX
 SO?
 HC
 CO
 C08
 NOX
 SO?
                               "FSULTS
                                SAMPLE
         MFTFR  READING/SCALE
S A M P I. F   PPM
RACKGRD  MFTEH  READING/SCALE
         PPM
         MFTER  REAPING/SCALE
         PPK
RACKGRD  MCTFR  READING/SCALE
RACKGHD  PPM
SAMPLF   MFTER  RFAUING/SCALE
SAMPLE   PERCENT
PACKGRD  MFTER  READING/SCALE
RACKGKO  PERCENT
         M^TEP  REAOING/SCALE
         ROM
RACKGRD  MFTER  RFAOING/SCALE
RACKGRD  PpM
CONCENTRATION  PPM
CONCENTRATION  PPM
CONCENTRATION  PfT
CONCENTRATION  PPM
COCENTRATION PPM
MASS (GRAMS)
MASS (GRAMS)
MASS (GRAMS)
MASS (GRAMS)
MASS (GRAMS)
                               SAMPLE
                               SAMPLE
                        HC  GRAM,
-------
                              TABLE
O
                                                   EMISSIONS FROM SINGLE BAG SAMPLE
                                                 VEHICLE NUMRFR   1
                      HATE  b/lfl/77               TIME    -(I HRS.        TEST NO.  ?
                      MODEL   1H75-NOVA  CHEVY  FM-qSFT-7                  ENGINE 5.7 LITREO
                      RUN DURATION    ?3.?7  MIN.   DISTANCE ORIVFN  ?1.7<* KILOMETRES
                      CVS RLOWFR  TEST  VOL.   PSn.qa  ACT.  CU. METRES
SULFATE DATA

 FILTER NO.
 SAMPLE VOL. CU. FT.
 SAMPLE TEMP. DEG. F
 SAMPLE ARFA SO. IN.
 DILUTION FACTOR
 STAND. ^EN. MICROG/ML
 STAMO. AREA SO. IN.
                                                  SAMPLE
                                                H7FH-?R28
                                                   I t . n I
                                                      Rl
SMI FUP DIOXIOE DATA

 SAMPLE VOL. cu. FT.
 SAMPLE TEMP. OEG. F
 AREA,RUR8LFR 1
 DTL. FACT. , BUBBLER 1
 AREA, HUMBLER 2
 OTL. FACT. , BUBBLER 5
 STAND. OEN. MICROG/ML
 STAND. AREArSQ. IN.
 so2, MILLIG/BUBBLER i
 snj, MILLTG/RIJRBLFP ?.
 303, PPM
                                                       5
                                                   20.00
                                               ?qqb5b.DO
                              i.on
                                70
                              O.on
                                 1
                              0.00
                                 }
                              i.oo
                              l.OD
                             o.noo
                             n.onn
                               P.O
                       SULFATF  AND SO? EMISSIONS
                        NET  SULFATErMILLIGRAM/TFST
                        NET  H?SO>t,MILLIGRAM/TFST
                        NFT  SO?, GRAM/TEST
                        NFT  SULFATE, MILLIGRAM/KILOMETRE
                        NFT  H?SOH, MILLIGRAM/KILOMETRE
                        NET  S02, GRAM/KILOMETRE
                       SULFUR BALANCE
                        FUEL WT.,  ?738 GRAMS
                                  SULFUR,GRAMS
                                  PCT.  RECOVERY
                                      308.851
                                      315.337
                                        0.000
                                       1».?08
                                       It.507
                                        0.000
                                                   BACKGROUND
                                                       1.00
                                                         70
                                                       0.00
                                                          1
                                                       1 .00
                                                       1 .00
                                                      0.000
 1.00
   70
 0.00
    1
 0,00
    1
 ) .00
 1.00
0.000
0.000
  0.0
                                                   .R5
                                     n. n n n
                                      o.nn
                           SULFUR IN FUEL,  .0310 PCT.
                            FUEL       S02       H2S01*
                                                .1031
     805 + H290-*

         .1031
         12.15

-------
n
CD
UN i i  MIJ.
VEHICLE '
        q         T K S> T N11. 1
        L   CHtVf NOVA
           HARdMrTER  73H.9II MM Of HG.
           DRY  UHL8  IFMP.    
-------
                                  TABLE.
                                                EXHAUST FMISSIflNS FROM  THREE HAG
                                                   VEHICLE NUMBER    q
                                  SAMPLE
                        OATE 3H/ I./77               TIME     J HRS.         TEST NO.  I
                        MODEL  1H7S CHEVY  NOVA                              FNfilNE 5.7 LITKEO
                        PUN DURATION   b?.bO  MIN.   DISTANCE DRIVEN   17.R1*  KILOMETRES
                        CVS iJLDrf^K TEST  VOL.   33b.tl  ACT. CO. METRES
                        SULFATE DATA
                                                    SAMPLE
                           HACKGRUUND
O
I
                         SAMPLE VOL. CU.  Fl.
                         SAMPLE TEMP. OFT,.  F
                         SAMPLE AREA SQ.  IN.
                         DILUTION FACTOR
                         STANO. OEN. MIC.ROG/HL
                         STAND. ARE4 SQ.  IN.
    18.2?
       7h
 7313b.no
        1
    ?n.on
205171.00
   71.
SULFUR OIOXIDE  DATA

 SAMPLE VOL.  CU.  FT.          1.011
 SAMPLE Tf.flp. OEG.  F            70
 AREA,HIIBBLER 1               0.00
 OIL. FACT.,BUBBLER  1           1
 AREA.HUMBLER 2               0.00
 OIL. FACT.,8USBLER  S           J
 STAND. OEN.  MICROG/ML       1.00
 STAND. AREA,SO.  IN.          1.00
 see, MILLIG/BUBBLER  i      o.ooo
 SOS, MILLIG/BUBBLER  3      O.OOn
 S05, PPM                      0.0

SULFATE AM)  SU2  EMISSIONS

 NET SULFATE,MILLIGRAM/TEST           53.095
 NET HaSOf,MILLIGRAM/TEST             54.210
 NET sue,GRAM/TEST                      o.ooo
 NET SULFATE,MILLIGKAM/KILOMETRE       ?.97b
 NET H2SC"*, MILLIGRAM/KILOMETRE         3.03B
 NET S02,GRAM/KILOMETRE                0.000
                        SULFUR BALANCE
                         FUEL HT.,  ?327  GRAMS
                                                        1 .(10
                                                          70
                                                        0.00
                                                           1
                                                        J .UO
                                                        1 .00
                                                       0.000
                               l.UIJ
                                 ?n
                               0.00
                                  1
                               0.00
                                  1
                               1.00
                               1.00
                              0.000
                              n.ooo
                                0.0
  SULFUR IN FUEL,  .0310  PCT.
   FUEL      SO?        HPSOH
                                          ,GRAMS
                                   PCT.  RECOVERY
                                                     .72
            O.MOO
             0.00
                        .0177
                                                            SOS + H2SOH

                                                                .0177

-------
                             TABLE
                                          EXHAU3T EMISSIONS FROM SINGLE BAG SAMPLE
                                                VEHICLE NUMBER   9
O
I
                      DATE  b/28/77
                      MODEL  1175 CHEVY NOVA
                      DRIVER   SR
                      WET  BULB TEMP  17 C
                      SPEC. HUM.   10.0 GRAM/KG
                            TIME     -0  HR3.
                            SET-7
                            TEST WT.      0  KG.
                            DRY BULB  TEMP   23 C
                            BARO.   739.1  MM  HG.
                  TEST NO.  2
                  ENGINE 5.7 LITREV 8
                  GVW    0 KG
                  REL. HUM.  5*.1* PCT
                  MEASURED FUEL  0.00 KG
                        RUN DURATION
                        BLOHER INLET PRESS.
                        BLOWER DIP.   PRESS.
                        RLOWER INLET TEMP.
                        OYNO REVOLUTIONS
                        BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
                        RLOWER CU.  CM /REV.
                        23.33  MINUTES
                       711.2   MM.  H20
                       711.2   MM   H20
                         13   DEG. C
                       31091
                        11S9H2
                        223»
                                     METER READING/SCALE
                                     PPM
                             BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
                             BACKGRD PPM
                             SAMPLE  METER READING/SCALE
                             SAMPLE  PPM
                             BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
  BAG RESULTS
   HC  SAMPLE
   HC  SAMPLE
   HC
   HC
   CO
   CO
   CO
   CO  BACKGRD PPM
   C02 SAMPLE  METER READING/SCALE
   C02 SAMPLE  PERCENT
   C02 BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
   C02 BACKGRD PERCENT
               METER READING/SCALE
               PPM
   NOX BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
   NOX BACKGRD PPM
   HC  CONCENTRATION PPM
   CO  CONCENTRATION PPM
   C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
   NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
   302 COCENTRATION PPM
       MASS (GRAMS)
       MASS (GRAMS)
                         NOX  SAMPLE
                         NOX  SAMPLE
                         HC
                         CO
   C02 MASS (GRAMS)
   NOX MASS (GRAMS)
   S02 MASS (GRAMS)

HC  GRAMS/KILOMETRE
CO  GRAMS/KILOMETRE
C02 GRAMS/KILOMETRE
NOX GRAMS/KILOMETRE
30? GRAMS/KILOMETRE

HC  GRAMS/KG OF FUEL
CO  GRAMS/KG OF FUEL
C02 GRAMS/KG OF FUEL
NOX GRAMS/KG OF FUEL
    GRAMS/KG OF FUEL
                                               .05
                                               .20
                                            32b
                                               .73
                                              0.00

                                              .»8
                                              1.1
                                             31b5
                                             7.07
                                             0.00
             IB.1*/?
               IB
             ll.H/2
               11
             20. 2/*
               19
               .87*
                1
             97.8/3
             1.8H
              f .9/3
              .08
              2.9/2
              2.9
                9
               17
             1.7B
             39.1
             0.0
             1.07
             t.3b
          708«».23
            IS. 83
             0.00
HC  GRAMS/MIN    .05
CO  GRAMS/MIN     .2
C02 GRAMS/MIN    30*
NOX GRAMS/MIN    .bB
302 GRAMS/MIN   0.00
                     CARBON  BALANCE  FUEL  ECONOMY  =    13.95  LITRES  PER  HUNDRED  KILOMETERS

-------
                         TABLE
                                      EXHAUST  EMISSIONS  FROM  SINGLE  BAG  SAMPLE
                                             VEHICLE  NUMBER    q
n
i
                  DATE  b/28/77               TIME     -0  MRS.         TEST  NO.   2
                  MODEL  1^75 CHEVY NOVA      SET-7                   ENGINE  5.7 LITREO
                  RUN DURATION   33.33 MIN.   DISTANCE  DRIVEN   21.71*  KILOMETRES
                  CVS BLOWER TEST VOL.  258.9b  ACT.  CU.  METRES
                           SAMPLE
SULFATE DATA               	

 FILTER MO.              47FH-28H7
 SAMPLE VOL. CU. FT.        lt.39
 SAMPLE TEMP. DE6. F           80
 SAMPLE AREA SQ. IN.    SbObfO.OO
 DILUTION FACTOR                1
 STAND. DEN. MICROG/ML      20.00
 STAND. AREA SQ. IN.    212215.00
 SO»,MICROG/FILTER        339.882

SULFUR DIOXIDE DATA

 SAMPLE VOL. CU. FT.         1.00
 SAMPLE TEMP. OEG. F           70
 AREA,BUBBLER 1              0.00
 OIL.  FACT.,BUBBLER 1           1
 AREA,flUBBLER 2              0.00
 OIL.  FACT..BUBBLER 2           1
 STAND. OEN. MICROG/ML       i.oo
 STAND. AREA,SO. IN.         1.00
 302,  MILLIG/BUBBLER  1      0.000
 so2,  MILLIG/RUBBLEN  2      o.ooo
 302,  PPM                      0.0

SULFATE AND  S02 EMISSIONS
                                                                     BACKGROUND
                                                                         1.00
                                                                           70
                                                                         0.00
                                                                            1
                                                                         1.00
                                                                         1 .00
                                                                        0.000
                  1.00
                    70
                  0.00
                     1
                  0.00
                     1
                  1.00
                  1.00
                                                                        0.000
                                                                        0.000
                                                                          0.0
                    NET  SULFATEfMILLIGRAM/TEST           2tS.271
                    NET  H2SOf,MILLIGRAM/TEST             250.H30
                    NET  302,GRAM/TEST                      0.000
                    NET  SULFATE,MILLIGRAM/KILOMETRE       11.28f
                    NET  H2SOt,MILLIGRAM/KILOMETRE         11.521
                    NET  302,GRAM/KILOMETRE                 0.000
                   SULFUR  BALANCE
                    FUEL  WT.,  2238  GRAMS
                              SULFUR,GRAMS
                              PCT.  RECOVERY
                           SULFUR  IN FUEL,
                            FUEL       302
      .0310 PCT.
           H230t
                             .bl
o.non
 o.oo
.0811
11.80
302 + H2SOH

    .OBIS
    11.80

-------
                                        KXHAU8T EMISSIONS FROM  SINGLF  H4R  SAMPLE
                                              VEHICLE NUMBER    H
                   PATF   h/PH/77
                   MODEL   1975  f"OVA  CHFVY
                   nRlvew    sw
                   WET HULR  TEMP   IB  C
                   SPFC.  HUM.   JU.II  (.WAN/KG
                             TINE     -U  MRS.
                             FET
                             TEST »»T.      0  KG.
                             ORY BULH TEMP  ?s  c
                             BAKU.   73H.h  MM   HG.
                             TEST ND.  3
                             ENGINE-  5.7 LITHFV R
                             GVW    0 KG
                             RF.L. HUM.  fq.i PCT
                             MEASURED FUEL  u.im KG
                     RUM DURATIUN
                     RLHWER  INLET  PRESS.
                     BLOWER  D1F.   PRESS.
                     BLIMEH  INLET  TEMP.
                     DYNO RFVdLHTlONS
                     PLOHER  REVOLUTIONS
                     RLO^tH  CU. CM
                        12.75 MINUTES
7) 1 .?
711.?
   f 3
23f OS
                                           2230
                              MM. H?0
                              MM  H20
                              OEG. C
O
I
                     RAG RESULTS
                      HC  SAMPLE
                      HC  SAMPLE
                      HC
                      HC
                      CO
                      CO
                      CO
                      CU
                      C02 SAMPLE
                      CO? SAMPLE
                METEW u± ADING/SCALE
                PPM
        BACKGKU MtTFR READING/SCALE
        BACKGRD PPM
        SAMPLE   KKTER RE ADI NG/SC ALF
        SAMPLE   PPM
        BACKGHD MFTFB Rfc AO I NG/3C ALE
        HACKGHO PPM
                METF.R READING/SCALE
                PEKCENT
   CM?  HACKGRD MFTER READING/SCALE
   C02  BACKGRO PERCENT
   NOX  SAMPLE   MEIER HEADING/SCALE
   NOX  SAMPLE   PPM
   NOX  HACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
   NOX  RACKGRl) PPM
   HC   CONCENTRATION PPM
   CO   CONCENTRATION PPM
   CO?  CONCENTRATION PCT
   NOX  CONCENTRATION PPM
   SO?  COCENTRATION  PPM
   HC   MASS  (GRAMS)
   CO   MASS  (GRAMS)
   CO?  MASS  (GRAMS)
   NOX  MASS  (GRAMS)
   SO?  MASS  (GRAnS)
                          20
                        10.R/2
                          11
                        1R.7/*
                          18
                         1. I/*
                           1
                        51.1/2
                        ?.3f
                         1.7/2
                         .fib
                        hl.7/?
                        hi. 7
                         1.1/2
                         l.R
                          11
                          It.
                        2.21
                        bO.l
                        n.o
                         .7?
                        2.01
                                                                12.91
                                                                 o.on
HC  GRAMS/KILOMETRE       .Of
CO  GRAMS/KILOMETRE       .13
CO? GRAMS/KILOhETRF    2SF
NOX GRAMS/KHUMF1RE       .7R
SO? GRANS/KILUMFTr'F      O.CIC1

HC  GRAMS/Kr,  OF  FUEL     .fS
CO  GfJAMS/KR  liF  FUEL     l.»
CO? URAMS/KG  OF  FUEL    31bb
NOX GRAMS/KG  OF  FUEL    8.f2
SO? UrtAHS/KG  OF  FUEL    (I.OH
       BALANCE  Fi/(-L  ECfNUMY r
                                                    HC  GR»MS/MIN    .ob
                                                    CO  GRAMS/MIN     .2
                                                    CO?  f.RAMS/MIN    381
                                                    NOX  GHAMS/MIN   l.lll
                                                    SO?  GHAMS/MIN   n.OI)
                                                    12.bO LITRFS PER HUMORED KILOMfTERS

-------
                          TAHLE
O
I
                                       FXH4IIS1  EMISSIONS FROM SINGLE HAG SAMPLE
                                              VEHICLE  MUMREK   S
                   DATE   b/efl/77,               TIME     -n  MRS.         TEST NO.   3
                   MODEL  117S NOVA CHEVY      FET                     ENGINE 5.7 L'TRFU
                   KUN  DUKATIHN   12.7S MIN.   DISTANCE  DRIVEN   Ib. HP KILOMETRES
                   CVS  BLCHEK TEST VOL.  137.53  ACT.  CU.  METRES
SULFATE DATA

 FILTER NO.
 SAMPLE VOL. CU.  FT.
 SAMPLE Tf-MP. DEG.  F
 SAMPLE AREA S«.  (N.
 DILUTION FACTOR
 STAND. DEN. MICRO(.:/ML
 STAND. AREA SO.  IN.
 SOH, MICROS/FILTER

SULFUR DIOXIDE  DATA

 SAMPLE VOL. CU.  FT.
 SAMPLE TEMP. DEG.  F
 APEA,HUBBLER 1
 DIL. FACT.,BUHBLER 1
 AREA,flUflBLER 2
 DIL. FACT. ,BUBPLER i
 STAND. DEN. MICROG/ML
 STAND. AHEA,SQ.  IN.
 sos, MILLIG/BUBPLER  i
 so?, MILLIG/BURBLER  ?
 305, PPM
                   SULFATE AND S05  EMISSIONS
                                               SAMPLE
                                             H7FH-2RHR
                                                 7.b2
                                                   82
                                            l?5S7S.On
                                                    5
                                                PU.no
                             1.0(1
                               70
                             0.00
                                1
                             O.DIl
                                1
                             1.00
                             1.00
                            n.ooo
                            o.ooo
                              U.O
NFT SULFATE, MILLIGRAM/TEST
NFT HSSO^, MILLIGRAM/TEST
NFT S02, GRAM/TEST
NFT SULFATE, MILLIGRAM/KILOMETRE
NET H?SOH, MILLIGRAM/KILOMETRE
NET S02, GRAM/KILOMETRE
                   SULFUR BALANCE
                    FUEL WT., 1533 GRAMS
                              SULFUR,GRAMS
                              PCT. RECOVERY
                                                           o.ooo
                                                          27.51*2
                                                           0.000
                                                                      BACKGROUND
                                                      1 .UU
                                                        7U
                                                      u.im
                                                         i
                                                      ) .00
                                                      i.oo
                                                     o. o n o
 i .00
   70
 o. no
    1
 0.00
    1
 1 .Mil
 1.00
0 . 0 0 f)
0.0(10
  0.0
                          SULFUR  KM FHFL,  .0310 PCT.
                           FUEL       S02
                                    II. (100
                                     0.00
                                                                              SOB +
                                                                   31 ,P3
                                                                .IHRf
                                                                31.23

-------
UN I ! rill .
vmin F
                     E"9
      TfM  Nl).  1
NOVA CHtVY
o
I
BAHIIMf TF K  7M ? . 1 •* r
DRY HULR  IEMP.    r
R E L . HUMIDITY


EXH«UST  EMISSIONS


     RLOWEK  DIF.
     BAG RESULTS
                                or HI;.
                              71  PC.! .
TAMLF                    VEHITLF  EMISSION RESULTS
                 1975  LIGHT  DUTY  EMSSIUKb TEST
          DATE   7/  1/77                      Mj-GR.  CODE   -I"
          FNGINF    5.7* LITPE  8              CURB  NT.      0 Ki-

                                         HE I MULFi TEMP   Pcf.e F.'FG.  c
                                          AfS. HUMIPITV   JS.h t
                                                                                                                  YR.
                                                                                                                  l-V*
1H7S
   I.
                                                                                                                                       K (-
                             PRESS., G?,  71J.2  MM.  H?0
BAG NO.
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
HC SAMPLE MFTFR
HC SAMPLE PPM
HC HACKGWD METFR
HC BACKGRD PPM
CO SAMPLE METFK
CO SAMPLE PHM
CO HACKGKD MtTEH
CO BACKGKO PPM
CO? SAMPLE MFTER


Rt ADING/SCAI F

REAOING/SCALF

READING/SCALE

READING/SCALE

RFAOING/SCALE
1
H n? 71
b9.1/2
h9
1H. J/2
1H
88. I/*
212
.*/*
1
H3.H/2
C02 SAMPLE PERCENT 1.9?
T02 BACKGKD METtP
C02 tlACKG^u PFRCEN
NOX SAMPLE METER
NOX SAMPLE PPM
NOX BAC"GRD METER
NUX HACKGRO PPM
S02 SAr-iPLE METER
.SO? SAc.PLfc PPM
502 BACKGRFJ MFTFR
SO? 6ACKGRU PPM
HC CONCENTRATION
CO CONCENTRATION
CO? CONCENTRATION
MOX CONCENTRATION
SO? CONCENTRATION
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
CO? MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS bKAMS
R02 MASS GRAMS
WEIGHTED MASS HC
WEIGHTED MASS LO
WEIGHTED MASS CO?
WEIGHTED MASS NOx
WEIGHTED MASS S02
READING/SCALE
r
READING/SCALE

READING/SCALE

RFADING/SCALE

READING/SCALE

PPM
PPM
PCT
PPM
PPM


2.0/?
.07
59.7/2
59.7
.9/2
.9
-n.ii/*
-0.11
-O.O/*
-O.U
5?
19S
l.Rb
58.9
0.0
2.51
17. h2
2h01.bt


.19 GRAMS/KI|.nMFTRE
1.2* GRAKS/KILflMETRE
H05.19 GRAMS/KILOMETRE
.9H GRAMS/KILOMETRE
0.00 GRAMS/KILOMETRE
10.21
n.no





                                                                          hLUKER  INIFT PHFSS.,  (-,1  7]}.f MM.  H20
                                                                                R  INLET TEMP.    H?  DE&. c
                                                                     b97in
                                                                      22.
                                                                        23
                                                                      13.5/2
                                                                        13
                                                                      33. 3/*
                                                                        31
                                                                        .7/*
                                                                         1
                                                                      b2.9/3
                                                                      1.1?
                                                                       1.9/2
                                                                       .07
                                                                      is.H/2
                                                                      13. R
                                                                        .9/2
                                                                        .9
                                                                      -o.n/*
                                                                      -o.o
                                                                      -u.n/*
                                                                      -o.ci

                                                                        10
                                                                        59
                                                                      l.Oh
                                                                      13.0
                                                                       0.0
                                                                       .78
                                                                      -».3b
                                                                                 3.8b
                                                                                 0.00
                                                                                                   30.1/2
                                                                                                     30
                                                                                                   13.7/2
                                                                                                     It
                                                                                                   b7.3/*
                                                                                                     bS
                                                                                                    1.7/*
                                                                                                      2
                                                                                        1.59
                                                                                         3.9/3
                                                                                         .nb
                                                                                        32.3/2
                                                                                        32.3
                                                                                          .7/2
                                                                                          .7
                                                                                        -n.o/*
                                                                                        -o.o
                                                                                        -o.o/*
                                                                                        -o.o

                                                                                          18
                                                                                          bO
                                                                                        1.53
                                                                                        31.7
                                                                                         0.0
                                                                                         .79
                                                                                        5.35
                                                                                     21H8.57
                                                                                        b.1*^
                                                                                        o.no
               FUEL  ECONOMY RY  CAkHilN RAL4NCE  =    5.S  KILOMETRE/LITRE

-------
n
 I
                                           FXHAUST  EMFSSIONS FROM THKFt BAG
                                               VEHlCLt  NUMBf-R
                                                          SAMPLE
                   DATE   I/  7/77               TIMe      1  MRS.        TEST Nil.   1
                   MODEL   IT7S NUVA CHEVf      EM-9                    ENGINE  6.7 LITREO
                   RUN DURATION   31.31 M1N.   DISlAMCf  DRIVEN  17. R1 KILOMETRES
                   cvs HLOWFK TEST VOL.  33^.19  ACT.  cu.  METRFS
                   SULFATE  OAT A
MO.
VOL.
     cu.
F I L T F R
SAMPLE
SAMPLE
S A M P L t A R F A  S u .
DILUTION FAC10K
STAND. DEW
STAN I). AREA  SQ.
                                     FT.
                                     . F
                                     IN.
                    SUI.FU« DIOXIDE DATA

                     SAMPLE VOL. cu. FT.
                     SAMPLE TEMP. DEC. F
                     OIL.  t- ACT. ,BUhBLER 1
                     OIL. FACT. ,»URBLFR  ?
                     STAND. OEM. MCPOG/ML
                     STANU. AfiEA,S«.  IN.
                     so?, MILLIG/HUBHLEK  i
                     soe, MILLIG/BUHBLER  2
                     so?, PPM
                                               SAMPLE
 H7-FH-?Rtq
    1 1. 3M
       71
  ?Rj 7.mi
         1
    20.0(1
s 01 s 19. M n
                             i.on
                               70
                             n.ou
                                i
                             n.nn
                                i
                             l.o o
                             i.nn
                            o.ooo
                            D.non
                              o.n
                    SULFATE AND so? EMISSIONS
                     NET SULFATE,MILLIGRAM/TEST
                     NFT H3SOH,MILLIGHAM/TEST
                     NET S05rGRAM/TEST
                     NET SULFATE»MILLIf;hAM/KILOMFTRE
                     NET H2SOH,MILLIGRAM/KILOMETRE
                     NET SOe,GRAM/KILOMETRE
                    SULFU.R BALANCE
                     FUEL wT.f 231R GRAMS
                               SULFUR,GkAMS
                               PCT. RECOVERY
                                        l.SPO
                                        1 . S M)
                                        o.nno
                                         ,10H
                                         .1111
                                        n.ono
                                                   BACKGROUND
                                                1 .0(1
                                                  70
                                                n. on
                                                   1
                                                1 .00
                                                ) .(id
                                               n.non
                                                1.IIU
                                                  70
                                                n. tio
                                                   i
                                                o.no
                                                   i
                                                j .no
                                                i.no
                                               n.ooo
                                               o.oon
                                                 o.o
                          SULFUR IN FUEL,  ,ri31U  PCT.
                           FUEL      503       HSSOH
                                    rj. n o n
                                      n.on
                                                                                SOP  +  HSSOt
                                                                    .OOOfa

-------
                           TABLE
n
                                         EXHAUST EMISSIONS FROM  SINGLE BAG SAMPLE
                                               VF.HIC.LF NUMRER    q
                    DATE  ?/  1/77
                    MODEL   1175  NOVA  CHEVY
we T HULH TEMP
SPFC. HIJM.-  I]
                                    ]H  f
                                    n  GRAM/KG
                             TIME     -|i  MRS.         TEST NO.
                             SET-7                   ENGINE S,
                             TEST WT.   1R1H KG.     GVw    n
                             D^Y BULB  TEMP  ?t r.    RFL. HUM,
                             8ARO.   7HS.7  MM   HG.   MEASURED
                                                                                          H
                                                      7 LITHEV
                                                      K G
                                                        |,P.3 PCT
                                                      FUEL  n.Oll
                                                                                            KG
                      RUN DURATION
                      BLOWER  INLET  PRESS.
                      BLOWER  OIF.   PRESS.
                      BLOWER  INLET  TEMP.
                      DYNO REVOLUTIONS
                      BLOWER  KEVOLl'T IONS
                      BL'IWER  CU. CM  /REV.
                        ?3.?h MINUTI-S
                       711.2  MM. H20
                       711.?  MM  H?0
                          •»!  DF.G. C
                       11878
                        1
        MFTFH  READING/SCALE
        PPM
HACKGHD METFK  READING/SCALE
BACKGRD PPrt
SAMPLF  METER  HF A(J I NG/SC ALE
SAMPLE  PPM
HACKGHD METER  READING/SCALE
  RAG  RESULTS
   HC   SAMPLE
   HC   SAMPLE
   HC
   HC
   CO
   CO
   CO
   CO   BACKGRD PPM
   CO?  SAMPLE  MFTFR RFADING/SCAlE
   C02  SAMPLE  PERCENT
   CO?  BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
   C02  HACKGRO PERCENT
   NOX  SAMPLE  METER READING/SCALE
   NOX  SAMPLE  PPM
   NOX  HACKGP.D MtTfc-R REAOING/SCALE
   NOX  BACKGKD PPM
        CONCENTRATION PPM
        CONCENTRATION PPM
   CO?  CONCENTRATION PCT
   NOX  CONCENTRATION PPM
   SO?  COCEN1RATION PPM
        MASS  (GRAMS)
        MASS  (GKAHS)
   CO?  MASS  (GRAMS)
   NOX  MASS  (GRAMS)
   SO?  MASS  (GRAMS)

HC  GRAMS/KILuNETKE      .Ob
CO  GRAMS/KILOMETRE      .21
CO? PRAMS/KILOMETRE   31H
NOV  GHArlS/KILn^ETKt      .P7
SO? GRAMS/KILOMETRE     O.HO
                       HC
                       CO
                       HC
                       CO
                                                                   21.1/2
                                              12.
                                                 13
                                              21. ?/*
                                                 2fl
                                                 .]/*
                                                  0
                                              S7.3/3
                                              1.83
                                                3.R/3
                                                .Ob
                                              •»b.7/2
                                              Hb.7
                                                1.?
                                                 10
                                                 19
                                              1.7P
                                              H5.7
                                              0.0
                                              1.23
                                              t.bB
                                                                  o.no
                    HC   URAMS/KG OF FUEL     .5b
                    CO   GKAMS/KG OF FUEL     2.1
                    CO?  GRAMS/KU OF FUFL    Blbl
                    NIOX  GRAMS/KG OF hUTL    S.75
                    SO?  GHAM5/KG OF FMCL    n.nn
                    CARBON BAL»NCE FHF.L l-rnNUMY  =
                                 HC  GRAMS/MIN     .05
                                 CO  GRAMS/MIN      .2
                                 CO? GRAMS/MIN     ?q?
                                 NOX GRAMS/MIN     .82
                                 SO? UHAMS/MIN   n.OO
                                 13.H-* LITRES PfcR  HHNOREO  KILOMETF.RS

-------
                               T A H L E
                                             FXHAU3T EMISSIONS  FROM SINGI.F BAG  SAMHfc
                                                   VEHTLI.f NUMRF.R    1
                              ?/  1/77               TIML    -ri  HRS.         TEST  tin.   ?
                       MUDF-.L   1178 NOVA CHF.VY      Sfc'T-7                   ENGINE  S.7 LlTl'td
                       RUN  liUKATION   P3. ?l,  MIN.   DISTAMCL  DRIVEN   Pl.SR KILOMETRES
                       CVS  HLDhFiK  TEST VOL.  ?SP.31 ACT. Cll.  METRFS
                       SU|
                                DATA
                                                    SAMPIF
                                                    BACKRWDUNI)
KTLfEri NO.
SAMPLL VOL.  cu. FT.
SAhPLt TEMP.  l;EG. F
SAMPLE AREA  SO. IN.
DILUTION  FACTOH
STAND. OEM.  MICHOG/ML
STAND. AREA  SO. IN.
S04,MICHOG/FILTFW
                                                  17FH-5H50
                                                     it.nq
                                                        Rll
                                                 R7P418.UO
                                                         1
                                                     50.00
 I .00
   70
 0.00
    1
 1.00
 J .00
0.000
                        SULFUR DIOXIDE  DATA
n
 I
SAMPLE  VOL.  CU. FT.          1.00
SAMPLE  TEMP.  DEU. F            70
AREA,BURBLEH  1               Q.QQ
DTL.  FACT.rBUNHLEtf I            1
APEA.RURBLER  ?               0.00
DIL.  fACT.,BUflBLFR ?            1
STAND.  DEN.  MICKOG/ML        1.00
STAND.  AREA,SO. IN.          1.00
S02,  MILLIG/BUBhLER 1       0.000
SP8,  MILLIG/HUflULER 2       0.000
sna,  PPM                      o.o
 i.oo
   70
 o. o u
    1
 0.00
    1
 1 .00
 1.00
0.000
0.000
  0.0
                        SULFATE AND SOP  EMISSIONS
NFT SULFATEf MILLIGRAM/TEST
NET HaSfH, MILLIGRAM/TEST
NFT 502, GUAM/TEST
NFT SULFATE, MILLIGRAM/ KILOMETRE
NFT H3SOH, MILLIGRAM/ KILOMETRE
NfT SOg,GRAM/KII.()METRb
SULFUR BALANCE
FUEL WT., aiflli l,l)AMR SULFUR
FUEL
SULFUR, GRAMS .b8
PCT. RECOVERY
183. b?7
1R7.4P3
0.000
B.35S
R.S30
n . o o o
IN FUEL, .0310
SOP
o.noo
n.on
PCT.
HPSOt
.Obl3
q.o?
                                                                                     SOP + HPS04

                                                                                         .Ob.I 3
                                                                                          1.07

-------
                              TABLE
                     EXHAUST  EMISSIONS  FROM  SINGLE  BAG  SAMPLE
                           VEHICLE  NUMBER    1
n
M
00
                       DATE  7/ 1/77
                       MODEL  197S NOVA CHEVY
                       DRIVER   SR
                       WET BULB TEMP  iq C
                       SPEC. HUM.   11.8 GRAM/KG
                            TIME     -0  MRS.
                            FET
                            TEST  WT.  1B1» KG.
                            DRY BULB  TEMP  2b C
                            BARO.   7*2.7 MM  HG.
                  TEST NO.  3
                  ENGINE 5.7 LITREV 8
                  GVW    0 KG
                  REL. HUM.  Sb.S PCT
                  MEASURED FUEL  0.00 KG
                         RUN DURATION
                         BLOWER INLET PRESS.
                         RLOWER OIF.  PRESS.
                         RLOWER INLET TEMP.
                         DYNO REVOLUTIONS
                         BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
                         BLOWER CU. CM /REV.
                        12.77  MINUTES
                       711.8   MM.  H20
                       711.2   MM   H20
                          *3   DEC.  C
                        2231
  BAG RESULTS
   HC   SAMPLE  METER  READING/SCALE
   HC   SAMPLE  PPM
   HC   BACKGRD METER  READING/SCALE
   HC   BACKGRD PPM
   CO   SAMPLE  METER  READING/SCALE
   CO   SAMPLE  PPM
   CO   BACKGRD METER  READING/SCALE
   CO   BACKGRD PPM
   C02  SAMPLE  METER  READING/SCALE
   C02  SAMPLE  PERCENT
   C02  BACKGRD METER  READING/SCALE
   C02  BACKGRD PERCENT
   NOX  SAMPLE  METER  READING/SCALE
   NOX  SAMPLE  PPM
   NOX  BACKGRD METER  READING/SCALE
   NOX  RACKGRO PPM
   HC   CONCENTRATION  PPM
   CO   CONCENTRATION  PPM
   C02  CONCENTRATION  PCT
   NOX  CONCENTRATION  PPM
   302  COCENTRATION PPM
   HC   MASS (GRAMS)
   CO   MASS (GRAMS)
   CO?  MASS (GRAMS)
   NOX  MASS (GRAMS)
   302  MASS (GRAMS)

HC  GRAMS/KILOMETRE      .03
CO  GRAMS/KILOMETRE      .03
C02 GRAMS/KILOMETRE   300
NOX GRAMS/KILOMETRE      .91
302 GRAMS/KILOMETRE     0.00

HC  GRAMS/KG OF FUEL    .3b
CO  GRAMS/KG OF FUEL     .»
C02 GRAMS/KG OF FUEL   31bB
NOX GRAMS/KG OF FUEL   9.b3
SOS GRAMS/KG OF FUEL   0.00
             18.H/2
               IB
             12.1/2
               12
              )•*.«»/*
               IS
               ,3/*
                0
             52.1/2
             2.tO
              1.7/2
              .Ob
             b7.»/2
             b?.«t
              l.t/2
              l.»
                8
               l»
             2.35
             bb.3
             0.0
              .57
              .5b
          5003.53
            15.22
             0.00
                       CARBON  BALANCE  FUEL  ECONOMY
HC  GRAMS/MIN    .Of
CO  GRAMS/MIN     .0
C02 GRAMS/KIN    392      '
NOX GRAMS/MIN   l.iq
302 GRAMS/MIN   o.oo
ia.8a LITRES PER HUNDRED KILOMETERS

-------
                           TABLE
                                        EXHAUST EMISSIONS FROM SINGLE BAG SAMPLE
                                              VEHICLE NUMBER   S
O
                    DATE  7/ 1/77              TIME    -0 HRS.        TEST NO.  3
                    MODEL  1175 NOVA CHEVY     FET                    ENGINE 5.7 LITREO
                    RUM DURATION   12.77 MIN.  DISTANCE DRIVEN  Ib.bl KILOMETRES
                    CVS BLOWER TEST VOL.  137.50 ACT. CU. METRES
                           SAMPLE
SULFATE DATA               	

 FILTER NO.              t7FH-2asi
 SAMPLE VOL. CU. FT.         7.37
 SAMPLE TEMP. DEC. F           8t
 SAMPLE AREA SO. IN.    117128.00
 DILUTION FACTOR                5
 STAND. DEN. MICROG/ML      20.00
 STAND. AREA SO. IN.    20-»b11.00
 SO»,MICROG/FILTER        S7b.l27

SULFUR DIOXIDE DATA

 SAMPLE VOL. CU. FT.         1.00
 SAMPLE TEMP. D£G. F           70
 AREA,BUBBLER 1              0.00
 OIL. FACT.,BUBBLER 1           1
 AREA,BUBBLER 2              0.00
 OIL. FACT.,BUBBLER 2           1
 STAND. DEN. MICROG/ML       1.00
 STAND. AREA,SO. IN.         1.00
 so2, MILLIG/BUBBLER i      o.ooo
 so?, MILLIG/BUBBLER 2      o.ooo
 302, PPM                     0.0

SULFATE AND  S02 EMISSIONS

 NET SULFATE,MILLIGRAM/TEST
 NET H2SOt,MILLIGRAM/TEST
 NET 302,GRAM/TEST
 NET SULFATE,MILLIGRAM/KILOMETRE
 NET H230H,MILLIGRAM/KILOMETRE
 NET 302,GRAM/KILOMETRE
                    SULFUR  BALANCE
                     FUEL WT.,  1580  GRAMS
                                SULFUR,GRAMS
                                PCT.  RECOVERY
                                                         H27.850
                                                         t3b.83S
                                                           0.000
                                                           25.b38
                                                           2b.l?b
                                                           0.000
                                                                      BACKGROUND
                                                                           1.00
                                                                             70
                                                                           0.00
                                                                              1
                                                                           1.00
                                                                           1.00
                                                                         0.000
                  1.00
                    70
                  0.00
                     1
                  n.oo
                     i
                  1.00
                  1.00
                 0.000
                 0.000
                   0.0
                           SULFUR  IN  FUEL,  .0310  PCT.
                            FUEL       S02       H230f
                             .tl
o.oon
 o.oo
.If28
21.17
302 + H2SOf

    .1*28
    21.17

-------
         UNIT NO.    9
         VEHICLE MODEL
      TEST NO. 1
NOVA CHEVROLET
TABLE                   VEHICLE EMISSION RESULTS
                1175  LIGHT DUTY EMISSIONS TEST
          DATE  7/30/77                     MFRR.  CODE
          ENGINE   5.7t LITRE 8             CURB WT.
                                                                                        -0
                                                                                        0 KG
                                                          YR.
                                                          GVM
1 175
   I) KG
n
I
NJ
O
                                      711.5 MM. H20
BAROMETER 7H().9a MM OF HG.
DRY BULB TEMP.   aa.a DEG. C
REL. HUMIDITY     b9 PCT.

EXHAUST EMISSIONS

     RLOWER DIF. PRESS., Ga,
     BAG RESULTS
     PAG NO.
     RLOWER REVOLUTIONS
     HC   SAMPLE  METER READING/SCALE
     HC   SAMPLE  PPM
     HC   BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
     HC   RACKGRD PPM
     CO   SAMPLE  METER READING/SCALE
     CO   SAMPLE  PPM
     CO   BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
     CO   BACKGRO PPM
     COa  SAMPLE  MFTER READING/SCALE
     COa  SAMPLE  PERCENT
     COa  BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
     COa  RACKGRD PERCENT
     NOX  SAMPLE  METER READING/SCALE
     NOX  SAMPLE  PPM
     NOX  BACKGRD METF.R READING/SCALE
     NOX  HACKGRD PPM
     SOa  SAMPLE  METER READING/SCALE
     SOa  SAMPLE  PPM
     SOe  BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
     SOa  BACKGRO PPM

     HC   CONCENTRATION PPM
     CO   CONCENTRATION PPM
     COa  CONCENTRATION PCT
     NOX  CONCENTRATION PPM
     SOa  CONCENTRATION PPM
     HC   MASS GRAMS
     CO   MASS GRAMS
     COa  MASS GRAMS
     NOX  MASS GRAMS
     SOa  MASS GRAMS
bb.b/a
  b?
is.b/a
  Ib
bb.S/*
 a??
 a.s/*
   8
f3.b/a
1.93
 i.b/a
 .Ob
b3.?/a
b3.7
 i.3/a
 1.3
-O.O/*
-0.0
-O.O/*
-0.0

  S3
 asH
1.88

 0.0
                               ab3n.ba

                                  0.00
              WEIGHTED MASS HC
              WEIGHTED MASS CO
              WEIGHTED MASS COa
              WEIGHTED MASS NOX
              WEIGHTED MASS SOa
             .15  GRAMS/KILOMETRE
            i.BS  GRAMS/KILOMETRE
          tlS.bB  GRAMS/KILOMETRE
             .78  GRAMS/KILOMETRE
            0.00  GRAMS/KILOMF.TRE
                                                                               WET BULB TEMP  18.3 DEG. C
                                                                                ABS. HUMIDITY  11.8 GRAMS/KG
                                                       BLOWER INLET PRESS.,  Gl 711.5 MM. H20
                                                       BLOWER INLET TEMP.    H3 DEG. C
                                                                             a
                                                                          b97b7
                                                                             ao
                                                                             is
                                                                           b3.b/*
                                                                             b3
                                                                            a. a/*
                                                                              7
                                                                           b5.b/3
                                                                           1.18
                                                    .Ob
                                                   11.9/2
                                                   11.1
                                                    1.3/8
                                                    1.3
                                                   -o.o/*
                                                   -0.0
                                                   -O.O/*
                                                   -0.0

                                                      7
                                                     55
                                                   1.12
                                                   10.7
                                                    0.0
                                                    .S3
                                                   8.31
                                                                           3.78
                                                                           0.00
                                                      3
                                                   »0b03
                                                    as.i/a
                                                      as
                                                    i3.7/a
                                                      1H
                                                    93.O/*
                                                      95
                                                     H.7/*
                                                       5
                                                    83.7/3
                                                    1.55
                                                     3.9/3
                                                     .Ob
                                                    30.9/3
                                                    30.9
                                                     i.o/a
                                                     1.0
                                                    -O.O/*
                                                    -0.0
                                                    -O.O/*
                                                    -0.0

                                                      13
                                                      8b
                                                    l.»9
                                                    30.0
                                                     0.0
                                                     .57
                                                    7.58
                                                 2087.58
                                                    t.53
                                                    0.00
              FUEL  ECONOMY  BY  CARBON BALANCE =   5,b  KILOMETRE/LITRE

-------
o
to
                                 TABLE
                      DATE  SO/  7/77
                                              EXHAUST  EMISSIONS FROM THREE BAG
                                                 VEHICLE  NUMBER   9
                                                  TIME  *0000  HRS.
                                                          SAMPLE
                                                  TEST NO.   1
MODEL  11.75 NOVA CHEVROLET                        ENGINE  5.7 LITREO
RUN DURATION   31.32 MIN.  DISTANCE DRIVEN  17.8H KILOMETRES
cvs BLOWER TEST VOL.  ssb.si ACT. cu. METRES
                           SAMPLE
SULFATE DATA               	

 FILTER NO.              H7FH-2852
 SAMPLE VOL. CU. FT.        18.03
 SAMPLE TEMP. DEG. F           75
 SAMPLE AREA SO. IN.     94798.00
 DILUTION FACTOR                 I
 STAND. DEN. MICROG/ML       5.00
 STAND. AREA SO. IN.    1852bS.OO
 SO*,MICROS/FILTER         25.5BH

SULFUR DIOXIDE DATA

 SAMPLE VOL. CU. FT.         1.00
 SAMPLE TEMP. DEG. F           ?o
 AREA,BUBBLER 1              0.00
 OIL. FACT.,BUBBLER 1            1
 AREA,BUBBLER 2              0.00
 OIL. FACT.,BUBBLER 2            1
 STAND. DEN. MICROG/ML       1.00
 STAND. AREA,SO. IN.         1.00
 so2, MILLIG/BUBBLER i      o.ooo
 so2, MILLIG/BUBBLER 2      o.ooo
 302, PPM                     0.0

SULFATE AND S02 EMISSIONS

 NET SULFATE,MILLIGRAM/TEST
 NET H2SOH,MILLIGRAM/TEST
 NET 302,GRAM/TEST
 NET 3ULFATE,MILLIGRAM/KILOMETRE
 NF.T H2SOH,MILLIGRAM/KILOMETRE
 NET 302,GRAM/KILOMETRE
                       SULFUR BALANCE
                        FUEL NT.,  23bO GRAMS
                                  SULFUR,GRAMS
                                  PCT.  RECOVERY
                                                              0.000
                                                              l.OB*
                                                              1.107
                                                              0.000
                                                                         BACKGROUND
                                                                             1.00
                                                                               70
                                                                             0.00
                                                                                1
                                                                             1.00
                                                                             1.00
                                                                            0.000
       1.00
         70
       0.00
          1
       0.00
          1
       1.00
       1.00
      0.000
      0.000
        0.0
                          SULFUR  IN FUEL,  .0310 PCT.
                           FUEL      302       H230t
                                                   .73
                                    0.000
                                     o.oo
.OObS
  .88
802 + H2SOf

    .00b5
      .88

-------
                                TABLE
                                             EXHAUST EMISSIONS FROM SINGLE BAG SAMPLE
                                                   VEHICLE NUMBER   1
                         DATE  7/50/77              TIME    -0 MRS.
                         MODEL  1175 NOVA CHEVROLET SET-7
                         DRIVER   SR                TEST WT.  181* KG.
                         WET BULB TEMP  17 C        DRY BULB TEMP  ?3 C
                         SPEC. HUM.    9.9 GRAM/KG   BARO.  7»1.7 MM  HG.
                                                TEST NO.  a
                                                ENGINE 5.7 LITREV 8
                                                GVW    0 KG
                                                REL. HUM.  St.* PCT
                                                MEASURED FUEL  0.00 KG
                           RUN DURATION
                           BLOWER INLET PRESS. 711.2
                           BLOWER DIF.  PRESS. 711.2
                           BLOWER INLET TEMP.     fa
                           DYNO REVOLUTIONS
                           BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
                           BLOWER CU. CM /REV.
                     a3.a7 MINUTES
                           MM. H20
                           MM  H20
                       fa  DEC. C
                    333Sf
O
M
M
                                        METER READING/SCALE
                                        PPM
                                BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
                                BACKGRD PPM
                                SAMPLE  METER READING/SCALE
                                SAMPLE  PPM
                                BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
BAG RESULTS
 HC  SAMPLE
 HC  SAMPLE
 HC
 HC
 CO
 CO
 CO
 CO  BACKGRD PPM
 CO? SAMPLE  METER READING/SCALE
 COS SAMPLE  PERCENT
 COS BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
 CO! BACKGRD PERCENT
             METER READING/SCALE
             PPM
 NOX BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
 NOX BACKGRD PPM
 HC  CONCENTRATION PPM
 CO  CONCENTRATION PPM
 COa CONCENTRATION PCT
 NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
 302 COCENTRATION PPM
     MASS (GRAMS)
     MASS (GRAMS)
                            NOX SAMPLE
                            NOX SAMPLE
                            HC
                            CO
                            COa  MASS (GRAMS)
                            NOX  MASS (GRAMS)
                            303  MASS (GRAMS)

                         HC   GRAMS/KILOMETRE       .0*
                         CO   GRAMS/KILOMETRE       .57
                         COa  GRAMS/KILOMETRE    3SS
                         NOX  GRAMS/KILOMETRE       .82
                         SOa  GRAMS/KILOMETRE      0.00

                         HC   GRAMS/KG OF  FUEL     .31
                         co   GRAMS/KG OF  FUEL     s.b
                         COa  GRAMS/KG OF  FUEL    3151
                         NOX  GRAMS/KG OF  FUEL    8.Of
                         SOS  GRAMS/KG OF  FUEL    0.00
                         CARBON  BALANCE FUEL  ECONOMY =
   ii.s/a
     19
   If.a/2
     If
   57.8/*
     57
    1.5/*
      a
   f3.t/2
   i.ia
    2.0/2
    .07
   f8.3/2
   18.3
    a.0/2
    a.o
      7
     sa
   1.8b
   f b.b
   o.u
    .89
  12.78
718b.a7
  18.29
   0.00
                              HC  GRAMS/MIN    .Of
                              CO  GRAMS/MIN     .5
                              coa GRAMS/MIN    309
                              NOX GRAMS/MIN    .79
                              302 GRAMS/MIN   0.00
                              13.81  LITRES PER HUNDRED KILOMETERS

-------
                              TABLE
                                           EXHAUST  EMISSIONS  FROM  SINGLE BAG SAMPLE
                                                 VEHICLE  NUMBER    q
O
 I
K>
U)
                      DATE  7/20/77               TIME     -0  MRS.         TEST NO.   2
                      MODEL  1175 NOVA CHEVROLET  SET-7                   ENGINE 5.7 L1TREO
                      RUN DURATION    23.27  MIN.   DISTANCE DRIVEN   22.31  KILOMETRES
                      CVS BLOWER TEST VOL.   2511.05  ACT.  CU.  METRES
                           SAMPLE
SULFATE DATA               	

 FILTER NO.              >»7FH-2BS3
 SAMPLE VOL. CU. FT.        It.lb
 SAMPLE TEMP. DEG. F           77
 SAMPLE AREA SQ. IN.    1787S1.00
 DILUTION FACTOR                1
 STAND. DEN. MICROG/ML      20.00
 STAND. AREA SO. IN.    21'»131».00
 SOt,MICROG/FILTER        Ibb.IRO

SULFUR DIOXIDE DATA

 SAMPLE VOL. CU. FT.         1.00
 SAMPLE TEMP. DEG. F           70
 AREA,BUBBLER 1              0.00
 OIL. FACT.,BUBBLER 1           1
 AREA,BUBBLER 2              0.00
 OIL. FACT.,BUBBLER 2           1
 STAND. DEN. MICROG/ML       1.00
 STAND. AREA,SQ. IN.         1.00
 S02, MILHG/BUB8LER 1      0.000
 so2, MILLIG/BUBBLER 2      o.ooo
 302, PPM                     0.0

SULFATE AND S02 EMISSIONS

 NET SULFATE,MILLIGRAM/TEST
 NET H2SO»,MILLIGRAM/TEST
 NET S02,GRAM/TEST
 NET SULFATE,MILLIGRAM/KILOMETRE
 NET H2SOH,MILLIGRAM/KILOMETRE
 NET S02,GRAM/KILOMETRE
                                                            118.731
                                                            121. 22t
                                                              0.000
                                                              5.322
                                                                         BACKGROUND
                                                                             1.00
                                                                               70
                                                                             0.00
                                                                                1
                                                                              .no
                                                                              .00
                                                                            o.ooo
 i.oo
   70
 0.00
    1
 0.00
    1
 1.00
 1.00
0.000
0.000
  0.0
                                                              0.000
                       SULFUR  BALANCE
                        FUEL WT.,  2275  GRAMS
                                  SULFUR,GRAMS
                                  PCT.  RECOVERY
                          SULFUR IN FUEL,  .0310 PCT.
                           FUEL      302       H2SO*
                             .71
                                    0.000
                                     0.00
                                                                                 802
                                                5.b2
                                                                                       H2SOt
                                                                                      5.b2

-------
                              TABLE
                                           EXHAUST  EMISSIONS FROM SINGLE BAG  SAMPLE
                                                VEHICLE
n
                      DATE   7/80/77               TIME    -0 HRS.
                      MODEL   1175 NOVA CHEVROLET  FET
                      ORTVF.R   SR                 TEST WT.  IRlf KG.
                      WET RULH TEMP   IB c         ORY BULB TEMP  2b c
                      SPEC.  HUM.  10.f GRAM/KG    BARO.   7*1.7 MM  HG.

                        RUN  DURATION          12.78 MINUTES
                        BLOWER INLET  PRESS.  711.8  MM. H20
                        RLOWER DIP.   PRESS.  711.2  MM  H20
                        RLOWER INLET  TEMP.     f2  DEC.  C
                        OYNO  REVOLUTIONS     ?f238
                        BLOWER REVOLUTIONS    blb03
                        BLOWER CU. CM /REV.   2229
                                                   TEST  NO.   3
                                                   ENGINE  5.7 LITREV  8
                                                   GVW     0 KG
                                                   REL.  HUM.  HI.7  PCT
                                                   MEASURED FUEL  0.00  KG
                                     METER READING/SCALE
                                     PPM
                             BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
                             BACKGRD PPM
                             SAMPLE  METER READING/SCALE
                             SAMPLE  PPM
                             BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
  BAG RESULTS
   HC  SAMPLE
   HC  SAMPLE
   HC
   HC
   CO
   CO
   CO
   CO  BACKGRD PPM
   C02 SAMPLE  METER READING/SCALE
   C02 SAMPLE  PERCENT
   C02 BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
   C02 BACKGRD PERCENT
               METER READING/SCALE
               PPM
   NOX BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
   NOX BACKGRD PPM
   HC  CONCENTRATION PPM
   CO  CONCENTRATION PPM
   C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
   NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
   S02 COCENTRATION PPM
       MASS (GRAMS)
       MASS (GRAMS)
                         NOX SAMPLE
                         NOX SAMPLE
                         HC
                         CO
                         C02 MASS (GRAMS)
                         NOX MASS (GRAMS)
                         302 MASS (GRAMS)
HC
CO
                          GRAMS/KILOMETRE
                          GRAMS/KILOMETRE
                      C02 GRAMS/KILOMETRE
                      NOX GRAMS/KILOMETRE
                      302 GRAMS/KILOMETRE

                      HC  GRAMS/KG OF FUEL
                      co  GRAMS/KG OF FUEL
                      C02 GRAMS/KG OF FUEL
                      NOX GRAMS/KG OF FUEL
                      SO? GRAMS/KG OF FUEL
   .02
   .10
305
   ,B8
  0.00

  .22
  i .n
 31b7
 1.15
 0.00
                       lb.5/2
                         Ib
                       13.8/2
                         If
                       IS.I/*
                         If
                        l.b/*
                          2
                       53.1/2
                       2.f b
                        2.1/2
                        .08
                       b8.7/2
                       b8.7
                        1.7/2
                        1.7
                          S
                         12
                       2.to
                       b7.3
                       0.0
                        .35
                       l.bO
                    5015.50
                      If .72
                       0.00
                      CARBON BALANCE FUEL ECONOMY =
                                HC  GRAMS/MIN    .03
                                CO  GRAMS/MIN     .1
                                C05 GRAMS/MIN    3qs
                                NOX GRAMS/MIN   us
                                SO? GRAMS/MIN   0.00
                                13.Of LITRES PER HUNDRED KILOMETERS

-------
                             TABLE
                                           EXHAUST  EMISSIONS  FROM  SINGLE  BAG SAMPLE
                                                 VEHICLE  NUMBER    9
O
to
                      DATE  7/20/77               TIME     -o  HRS.         TEST NO.   3
                      MODEL  11.75 NOVA CHEVROLET  FET                     ENGINE 5.7 LITREO
                      RUN DURATION   12.78 MIN.   DISTANCE  DRIVEN   lb.71  KILOMETRES
                      cvs BLOWER TEST VOL.   137.si  ACT.  cu.  METRES
                           SAMPLE
SULFATE DATA               	

 FILTER NO.              >»7FH-285t
 SAMPLE VOL. CU. FT.         7.3H
 SAMPLE TEMP. DEG. F           83
 SAMPLE AREA 30. IN.     8?7b5.00
 DILUTION FACTOR                5
 STAND. DEN. MICROG/ML      20.00
 STAND. AREA 30. IN.    21*13'*.00
 SOt,MICROG/FILTER        tOI.BbO

SULFUR DIOXIDE DATA

 SAMPLE VOL. CU. FT.         1.00
 SAMPLE TEMP. DEG. F           ?o
 AREA,BUBBLER 1              O.flO
 OIL. FACT.,BUBBLER 1           1
 AREA,BUBBLER 2              0.00
 OIL. FACT.,BUBBLER 2           1
 STAND. DEN. MICROG/ML       1.00
 STAND. AREA,30. IN.         1.00
 302, MILLIG/BUBBLER 1      0.000
 302, MILLIG/BUBBLER 2      o.ooo
 302, PPM                     0.0

SULFATE AND  302 EMISSIONS
                                                                         BACKGROUND
                                                                             1.00
                                                                               70
                                                                             0.00
                                                                                1
                                                                               00
                                                                               00
                                                                            o.uoo
 1.00
   70
 n.oo
    1
 0.00
    1
 i.no
 i.oo
o.ooo
0.000
  0.0
NET SULFATE, MILLIGRAM/TEST
NF.T H2SO>», MILLIGRAM/TEST
NET 302, GRAM/TEST
NET SULFATE, MILLIGRAM/KILOMETRE
NET H2S01, MILLIGRAM/KILOMETRE
NET 802, GRAM/KILOMETRE
SULFUR BALANCE
FUEL WT., IbOS GRAMS SULFUR
FUEL
SULFUR, GRAMS .50
PCT. RECOVERY
3C15.fl7
311.830
0.000
18.27b
IB.bSI
0.000
IN FUEL, .0310
S02
0.000
0.00
PCT.
H2SOH
.1020
20. tf
                                                                                 302  +  H2S01

                                                                                     .1020
                                                                                     20.HH

-------
o
KJ
                                            T A PI  F.
ii' i r i-in.     i
VFHl Cl F "i'|-i( L
                                  TFS1 1C.  )
DATE  7/??/?7
ENGINE   5.7*  LITRE
                             VEHICLE EMISSION RESULTS
                           LIGHT DUTY  EMISSIONS TEST
                                                                               MFGR.  CODE
                                                                               CURP  «T.
                                                                -0
                                                                0  KG
                                                                                                                            YR-
1975
   0 KG
  '•/11 * F I f. P  7 M u ,
pP Y 'II11 li  T F MD ,
PEL. Hli'i I DM Y

F«HAtl<5T F'M
                                    HC-.
                               m
                                          7)1.?  "V.  H?0
                 '••F 1 RHTFP"  <«3.9  C'l
                 >• t IFHTFO  "A""!  rn?
                 "F1GHTFO  MflSH  MOV
                 "•'EIGHTH'  ^SS  ?n?
                                           IB r,RAMS/KiLOMFTRE
 ,9S   .,.._.
t..nn GRAMS/KILOMETRE
                                             WET BULB TEMP   17.8  DEG. C
                                              ARS. HUMIDITY   10.8 GRAMS/KG
                                             BLOWER INLET PRESS.,  Gl 711.2 MM.  HZO
                                             BLOWER INLET TEMP.    43 DEG. C
pan
I, AT,
'•< L n .<
"C
wC
MC
HC
en
ro
ro
CO
C'l?
en?
CD?
CO?
no*
NQX
NOX
•mx
so?
so?
SO?
S'l?
HC
f.ll
rri?
Wll*
so?
HC
eo
CO?
NO*
so?
UFSMI TS
Mr>,
••Fw oF vnU'T TiT>'S
SflMf LF VF TC P
SA.«PI_F ^»'i
H/>rKr,DP .JFTFP
RA(-" ^ F t F R
H A f K G P 0 p P ''
SA».-PLF 'E'FP



PF ftPINR/SCAl F

RF AnjMr,/sc/>LE

PFAOINC/Sr ALF

fjf AOING/STALE

UFADlNp/Sr ALE
SAnPLF MFUCFNl
Hdr^^po '-'
HACKGPn ^fTF.P
"ATKG90 PP^
co>'rE'" I&AT t"M
Cn»CENTPATlnN
CPMCEMPA r ron
CPMCFMTP4T t UN
eOK'CE'iTPAT ION
MAS3 RR A '•••<»
MASS R » A ": S
MASS GRA.'S
MASS r,»AM.«
y«ss r,9A-«$
RfARIMG/Sr &UE

RFAD1NG/SCALE

(•'FADING/SCALE

PFAPJNR/Sr ALE

PPK'
PPM
PCT
PPM
PPM






1
nnbse
72. R/?
73
l^.H/2
1*
hn.i/*
?•*!
1.9/*
b
»H.9/?
2. no
1.1/2
.H5
2b.3/3
78.9
.1/3
.3
-O.O/*
-0.0
-O.O/*
-0.0
bl
222
1.9h
78. b
0.0
2. bB
19.78
2759.9?
11. 5b
n.oo

?
b97«;7
21. 9/?
22
1H.B/2
15
Hb.9/*
103
1.7/*
S
b5.7/3
1.18
l.t/Z
.05
13,b/2
13. fa
.1/3
.3
-O.O/*
-0.0
-O.O/*
•0.0
8
9H
1.13
13.3
0.0
.b«*
1H.35
?729.9b
3.3b
0.00

3
H0b99
29.0/2
29
I*. 3/2
1*
88. H/*
91
1.5/*
3
88.3/3
l.b*
3.9/3
.fib
3B.b/2
38. b
.8/2
.B
•O.O/*
-0.0
-O.O/*
•0.0
Ib
BH
1.59
37.9
0.0
.73
7.51
2239.55
5.57
0.00
                 FUEL
                                  CAB *»'""•' PALAMCF  =   s.t  KILOMETRE/LITRE

-------
O
NJ
-J
                                                   EXHAUST FMfSSIONS FROM  THREE  BAG  SAMPLE
                                                                        1
                          I ATE f?i  •>/->•>               Tt"'F *pnriO  MRS.         TEST NO.   1
                          MmtL   19?^  NIIVA rHF.vRnLF.1                           ENGINE 9.7 LITREO
                          PIIM |i|jpftTToM    ii.i? ^TM.   nisTANCE  DRIVEN  17.HH  KILOMETRES
                          CVS «l f'."Fo  TFST  V0| .   I37.lt, ACT. CU.  METRES
                          SHI
                           S6MPLF. VOL.  CM. FT.
                           SAMPLt TF'"P.  DF.f;. F
                           SAMPLE »RF4  s'J. TIJ.
                                            jn.
                           STAMO. *QFA
                          SMIFUO
SA>.'P|.F  VnL.  CU. FT.
3A,«Pi.f  TFMP.  HEG. F
4UEA,Ri)fiqLER  I
TTL. Firr. ,RHaqLFP  1
                           "IL. F AfT..!»IIP.*LER ?
                           STAMP). npM.  vTCRnfi/ML
                           5T»Mr). Aof 4, so.  IN.
                           303, MlLl.TG/HiiuuLF1?  I
                           SO?, MJLl TR/rtUUHLF »  ?
                           SO?, PPM

                          SUI.FATF AMO  sn?  FMISSTOMS
                           NET 3i'LFATF..*lTLL
                           'MFT H?snt, MILLIGRAM/TEST
                           NET Sf)3,f;RAM/TEST
                           "•JET SULFATE, MTU.
                           NET n?sn»,^TLL TI;RAM/K
                           •-JET Sn?. r,
                          SULFUR RA
                           FHFL «T.,  eth?  GRAMS
                                      SHUFHR, r;
                                      PTT.
                                                            E
                                                                                BACKGROUND
iFH.pfl^?
n.7h
71
i^so. nn
i
?o.no
i<»5.no
".t70
) .no
?n
n.oo
i
n.oo
i
1 .00
I. no
o.nnn
o.nno
n.o
7.0H7
7.1S5
0.000
METPE .315
TRF ,
-------
                                  T « a L F
                           T EMISSIONS FROM  SINGLE  BAR SAMPLE
                           VFHTCLF
O
I
|SJ
00
                                                      Tl"F    -n HRS.         JEST NO,  ?
                                            CHF.vtTiLET SfcT-7                   ENGINE 5.7 LITRFO
                          MJf: DUETTO")    ?}.?? "IN.  DISTANCE DRIVEN   ? ?. * h KILOMETRES
                          cvs HI.II.-.F?  TFST  VOL.  ?sn.t,t ATT. cu. METRES
                          SUIFMF n»TA
                           SA»1PLF  VOL.  CM.  FT.
                           3AMP|_F  TFMP.  OFR.  F
                           Si'-'PLF  flPFA  SO.  IN.
                           DILUTION  FACTOR
                           STANn.  OFKI.  MICPnr;/ML
                          SULFUo
 SAMPLE VnL.  CU.  FT.
 SAMPLE TFMP.  OER.  F
 AR£A,dllPRLF_9  1
 OIL. FArT.,"UP»LFR l
 AR£A,RUPRLtP  ?
 nil. F »rT.,RURBLER ?
 ST4NO. npM.  "'ICROR/^'L
 STAN'n. AOEA.SO.  TN.
 sn?, MILLTG/RUHPLFM  i
 sn?. MILLIG/RIIRRLEH  ?
 sn?, PPM
SUL^AfE JMH
                                           FMISSIONS
                           NET
                           NFT HPSrm.MTLLTGRAM/TFST
                           ijf T SOP , f;9AM/Th ST
                           NE r SULFATE.^RL rCRAM/KjunMETPE
                               30?,r.PAu/K
                                       157.555
                                       IbO.Bbt
                                        0.000
                                        7.01*
                                        7.1bl
                                        0.000
                                                                              BACKGROUND
F H m
It

SHQ

?n
KR»
?' .
1

n

n

)
1
o.
n.

?«5b
*77
.no
1
.00
.no
hn?
.00
70
.00
1
.00
1
.on
.00
ono
oon
o.n
l.on
70
0.00
1
1.00
1.00
0.000
1.00
70
0.00
1
0.00
1
1.00
1.00
0.000
0.000
0.0
                           FUEL
                                           PHJ^S
                           SULFUR IN FUEL,
                            FUEL      SO?
                                                       ,71
                                     PP T .  PFCOvF py
n.ooo
 n.uo
 PCT.
H3SO»

,055b
 7.38
                                                                                      802  +  H?SOH
                                                                  7.38

-------
                                 1 A '> I. If
o
 I
OJ
o
      f'TSSinr-3 FHO** SINGLE  BAG SAMPLF
    VEHKLE
                         P4TF   7/??/77               TI"F     -n  HRS.         TEST  MO.  3
                         MHdFi   |q77 urn/A fHEVPnLFT FET                      ENGINE 5.7 LITRE   B
                         OhMvto    c(R                 TFST "T.   IRlt  KG.      GVW     0 KG
                         t.t^  RIIL^  TFWP  ta C         nRY Pi'LR  TEMP  22 c     REL,  HUM.  bS.1 PCT
                         SPEC.  HHM^.  n.q GRA"/KG    RARO.   7HH.7  MM  HG.    MEASURED FUEL  0.00  KG
                           RL(;.«ER
                                         PPFSS.
 12.7K MjNUTES
711.?  MM.  H?0
RI_l)'vF » t^LF T TFMP.
nvNii £F\/ni_uTTOM$
RLOvjER RFVOLUTTOf'S
BLr'
cn?
tvOx
so?
GOA
GO A
GRA
f.R A
T.PA
GPi
G^«
Go 4
GLA
QPfl
SAMPLF "FTFR
SAMPLE P P ' '
MACKGRO "FTFR
H Af KGRf) PP '
8AVPLF '-'ETFR
SA^1PLF PP*'
H*CKGPn "FIFO
SAMPLF METFW
3AMPLF PFRCEN
PFAOING/SCALE i?.*/?


17
f FADING/SCALE 11.S/8


READING/SCALE


READING/SCALE
m
37.?/*
3H
1.7/*
T
RFADIMG/SCALE s»,3/2
T

HSCKf;Rn ''FTFK HF ADI^'G /SCALE
Raj-KGRo PERCE^'
T

SA^Pl.F '-"FTFR ^FADING/SCALE
s s H»PLF PPM
HJCKfiPO "FTFW
SArKGPt1 PPM
CnivlCFNTRAT ION
CnwfEMTWAT ION
cn^!^E^|IPAT TON
CnMCFMTRAT ION


RF AHIMR/SCALE

PPM
PPM
PCT
PPM





CnrE^TR AT inM PPM
"AS9 (GPAMS)
MASS f G H A V S 1
MASS (GRAr'S)
'•'ASS f G P » M S )
"AgS (GWA"S)
"S/K I| n''ETRf
;-"
-------
                                 TAHI.E
                    FXHAUST  EMISSIONS  FROM SINGLE BAG SAMPLE
                           VEHICLE  NUMBER    s
O

CO
                         PME   7/??/?7               TIME    -P HRS,         TEST  NO.   3
                         MOPEL   1177  MUVA  CHFVPQLET FET                     ENGINE  5.7 LITREO
                         KUN. DURATION   l?.7(, MIM.  DISTANCt DRIVEN   lb.17  KILOMETRES
                         cvs HL (•"".• EP  TEST  VOL.  137.ti ACT. cu. METRES
                                                     SAMPLE
                         SIILFAjE  OAT/1

                          FILTfP  "n.
                          SAMPLE  VOL.  CU.  FT.
                                        ntG.  F
                                       so.  IN.
                          DILUTION  FACTOR
                                  HEN.  MICROR/ML
                                  AREA  SO.  IN.
SULFIJ3 DTnXIOE DATA

 SAMPLE VOL. CU.  FT,
 SAMPl.E TFMP. nFG. F
 AREA, HURRLER i
 OIL. FACT. .PUHRLFR  1
                           Oil..  FACT. .RIIHHLF» ?
                           STAND.  DFN.  iucRnr,/ML
                           STAND.  ASEA.SQ. IN.
                           so?,
                                      so?
                           NET  SllLFaTE,MILLTGR&M/TEST
                           NET  H?30t,''ILL IGRAM/TEST
                           NET  goa,GRAM/TEST
                           NET  .lULFATE.MiLI.IGRi
                           NET  H?so*,fMLL I C,'BAM/KILOMETRE
                           NET  SO?.,r,RAM/KiLO'*FTRE

                          SULFUR  RALANT.E
                           FUEL WT., IKbn GRAMg
                                     SULFUR. GRAMS
                                     PCI. RECOVERY
                                                                             BACKGROUND
t7FH.?8S7
7.71
R?
81131. OH
S
?n.oo
ailbfH.on
H2H.?3b
1.00
1
0.00
1
0.00
1
1.00
1.00
o.ooo
0.000
0.0
IS
EST 211.181
iT SOb.BBl
0,000
ILOMETRE I7.b78
.OMETRE 18,050
0.000
SULFUR IN FUEL, .0310 PCT.
FUEL 302 H8SOH
.51 0.000 .100?
n.oo 11. Hb

1.00
70
0.00
1
1.00
1.00
0.000
l.QD
1
0.00
1
0.00
1
1.00
1.00
0.000
0.000
0.0






so? + Heso1*
.100?
11. tb

-------
                APPENDIX D

             COMPUTER PRINTOUTS
                    FOR
  AIR MODULATION SYSTEM OPTIMIZATION AND
DURABILITY TESTS ON THE 1975 CHEVROLET NOVA
      (Tests in Chronological Order)

-------
                                 1ABI.F
IJU J ! Mi .
VF H I C I. E  Mi nil
                       i F :; i  tui.  *
                CHI- V Y  NHV A
                                            DATE
HAMflMFIFM  73h.?S MM I,F  HI,.
DRY liniH  ItMP.   ?t,.h  DEC.  C
Mf L . HUM IpT TY     Ml PCT.
FXHAUST  EMISSIONS

     BLOWER  DIF. KPl ;;;;.,
     HAG  RESULTS
     HAG  NO.
           K  REVOLUTIONS
                               bHII.V MM.  H20
HC
HC
HC
HC
ro
CO
CO
CO
CO?
CO?
CO?
SAMPLE MF TF-R
SAhPLE PPM
HACKGRO HF Tl-R
hACKGRD PPM
SAMPLE MF. If R
SAMPLE PPM
RACKGRD MKTFP
tlAf.KGRU PPM
SAMPLE MF fF R
SAMPLE PERtFN
HACKGRD MFTFR
RFAnIHG/SCALE

RF AI>INI;/SCALE

READING/SLAI.E

READING/SCALE

READING/SCALE
T
READING/SCALE
CU? HACKGRll PERCENT
NOX
NOX
flUX
NIJX
SU2
S02
SO?
so?
HC
cn
ru2
NOX
SO 2
HC
CO
C02
NOX
Si) 2
SAMPLE MF TF.R
SAhPLE PPM
BACKGRD ftF TF R
HACKGRD PPM
SAMPLE METER
SAMPLE PPM
HACKGRD MLTEK'
HACKGKO PPM
CUNCENTRA f ION
C'iNCENTRrt 1 ION
CONCENTRAl ION
CUNCENTWAT ION
CUMCl'NTRAT KiU
MASS URAfIS
MASS GRAMS
MASS GRAMS
MASS GRAMS
MASS GRAMS
WEIGHTED MASS HC
Wf IGHTfD MASS CO
REAOING/SUALE

l-(F ADING/SCALE

READING/SCALE

RKAOING/SCALE

PPM
PPM
PCT
PPM
PPM





.11 GRAMS.
2.75 GKAMS,
WEIGHED MASS CO? 31*. ID GHAMS,
WEIGHTED MASS NOX
WEIGHTED MASS so?
.7b GRAMS/
U.OD GKAMS,
                                                           VEHICLE  EMISSION RESULTS
                                                         LIGHT DUTY  IMISSIONS TEST
                                                  1/30/77                       MFGH.  CODE   -U                   YR.   Iq7b
                                                  I    S.7*  LITRE B              CURB  wl.      I) Kb                 GVM      II KG

                                                                           WET BULK TEMP   20.0 DtG.  C
                                                                            AbS. HUMIDITY  12.7 GRAMS/KG
                                                                           BLOWER INLET  PRESS., Gl  K8H.7 MM. H80
                                                                           BLOWER INLET  TEMP.   H3  DEG.  c
                                                     18. 3/3
                                                     1 .85
                                                      H.3/3
                                                      .07
                                                     bb.0/2
                                                     bb.O
                                                      1.5/2
                                                      1.5
                                                     -n.o/*
                                                     -M.0
                                                     -u.n/*
                                                     -».o
                                                      581
                                                    1.80
                                                    b-F.7
                                                      fl.O
                                                    3.S5
                                                   52.Ib
                                                 2511.08
                                                   10 . 0 7
                                                    0.00
                                                       1
                                                   •H)7l)7
                                                    12.7/2             17.3/2
                                                       13                 17
                                                    13.7/2             12.8/2
                                                       1*                 13
                                                    27.U/3             bl.?/*
                                                      F.31                 bl
                                                                       be.e/3
                                                                       1.11
                                                                        .1)8
                                                                       ll.b/g
                                                                       11. b
                                                                        1.3/2
                                                                        1.3
                                                                       -O.O/*
                                                                       -o.u
                                                                       -O.O/*
                                                                       -O.ll

                                                                          b
                                                                         SH
                                                                       l.Of
                                                                       Id.*
                                                                        0.0
                                                                       2.78
                                                                       0.00
                                                                                         21.b/2
                                                                                           22
                                                                                         10.1/2
                                                                                           11
                                                                                         55. t/*
                                                                                           SH
                                                                                          l.b/*
                                                                                            2
                                                                                         1.5b
                                                                                          ».b/3
                                                                                          .07
                                                                                         2H.1/2
                                                                                         2H.1
                                                                                           .1/2
                                                                                           .1
                                                                                         -O.O/*
                                                                                         -n.o
                                                                                         -o.o/*
                                                                                         -o.o

                                                                                           12
                                                                                           so
                                                                                         1.50
                                                                                         23.3
                                                                                          0.0
                                                                                          .52
                                                                                         t.31
                                                                                      201*. 11
                                                                                         3.b3
                                                                                         0.00
     FUEL ECONOMY  HY CAH80N  BALANCE =    5.H   KILOMETRE/LITRE

-------
         UNIT  NO.     q
         VEHICLE MODEL
      TEST NO. i
NOVA CHEVROLET
TABLE                   VEHICLE EMISSION RESULTS
                1975  LIGHT UUTY EMISSIONS TEST
          DATE ll/ 3/77                     MFGR. CODE
          ENGINE   S.7H LITRE 8             CURB  Wl.
-I]
0 KG
YR.  1975
GVM     U KG
         BAROMETER 7tO.Hl MM OF HG.
         DRY  BULB TEMP.    23.3 DEG. C
         REL.  HUMIDITY     3U PCT.
D
u>
         EXHAUST  EMISSIONS

              BLOWER DIF.  PRESS.,
              BAG RESULTS
          G2, fa73.i MM. H20
RAG NO.
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
HC SAMPLE METER
HC SAMPLE PPM
HC BACKGRO METER
HC BACKGRD PPM
CO SAMPLE METER
CO SAMPLE PPM
CO BACKGRD METER
CO BACKGRD PPM
C02 SAMPLE METER


READING/SCALE

READING/SCALE

READING/SCALE

READING/SCALE

READING/SCALE
C02 SAMPLE PERCENT
C02 BACKGRD METEK
READING/SCALE
C02 BACKGRD PERCENT
NOX SAMPLE METER
NOX SAMPLE PPM
NOX BACKGRD METER
NOX BACKGRD PPM
302 SAMPLE METER
302 SAMPLE PPM
S02 BACKGRD METER
S02 BACKGRD PPM
HC CONCENTRATION
CO CONCENTRATION
C02 CONCENTRATION
NOX CONCENTRATION
S02 CONCENTRATION
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
C02 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
302 MASS GRAMS
WEIGHTED MASS HC
WEIGHTED MASS CO
HEIGHTED MASS C02
WEIGHTED MASS NOX
WEIGHTED MASS S02
READING/SCALE

READING/SCALE

READING/SCALE

READING/SCALE

PPM
PPM
PCT
PPM
PPM


1
40705
8.5/3
85
.8/3
8
92. 9/*
471
1.5/*
5
95.1/3
1.79
3.9/3
.Ob
92.4/2
92.4
1.1/2
1.1
-o.n/*
-o.o
-o.o/*
-o.o
78
44b
1.73
91.5
0.0
3.45
39.77
2441.24


.21 GRAMS/KILOMETRE
l.Bfa GRAMS/KILOMETRE
395.90 GRAMS/KILOMETRE
.85 GRAMS/KILOMETRE
0.00 GRAMS/KILOMETRE
11. tt
0.00





                                                        WET  BULB  TEMP  13.3 DEG. C
                                                         ABS.  HUMIDITY   5.5 GRAMS/KG
                                       BLOWER INLET PRESS.,  Gl  b?3.1  MM.  H20
                                       BLOWER INLET TEMP.    HS  DEC. c
                                                      z
                                                   b981b
                                                    1H.S/2
                                                      It
                                                     7.1/2
                                                       7
                                                    25. O/*
                                                      S3
                                                     2.2/*
                                                       i
                                                    bO.S/3
                                                    1.07
                                                     3.7/3
                                                     .lib
                                                    lb.2/2
                                                    lb.2
                                                      .7/2
                                                      .7
                                                    -O.O/*
                                                    -o.n
                                                    -o.o/*
                                                    -o.o

                                                       B
                                                      20
                                                    1.02
                                                    IS. fa
                                                     0.0
                                                     .bO
                                                    3. Ob
                                                                           0.00
                                                                                               3
                                                                                            t073b
                                                                                             22.7/2
                                                                                               23
                                                                                              b.9/2
                                                                                                7
                                                      f 7
                                                     I. !/*
                                                       I
                                                    87.2/3
                                                    I.b2
                                                     3.5/3
                                                     .05
                                                    28.0/2
                                                    28.0
                                                      .8/2
                                                      .8
                                                    -O.O/*
                                                    -0.0
                                                    -O.O/*
                                                    -0.0

                                                      17
                                                      HI
                                                    1.57
                                                    27.3
                                                     0.0
                                                     .71
                                                    3.91
                                                 2215.83
                                                    3.42
                                                    0.00
              FUEL ECONOMY BY CARBON BALANCE =   5.9  KILOMETRE/LITRE

-------
UN I 1 Nil. M TK-ST NO
Vi-HICLE MilOEL CHf.VY NOVA
BAROMFTFR ? H h . 7 1
OKY RIILH TEMP.
RF-L. HUMIDITY
•, MM
?}
•»
OF HG.
.9 DEG.
8 PCT.
C
                                      TAHLE                   VEHICLE EMISSION RESULTS
                                                      1975  LIGHT UJTY EMISSIONS Tt3T
                                                DATE 11 / -»/77                     HFGR.
                                                ENGINE   5.7t LITRE H             CURB
                                                                             WEI BULB TEMP
                                                                              ABS. HUMIDITY
                  CODE   -0
                  T.     0 KG

                      lb.7 DEG. C
                        8.9 GHAMS/KG
                                                                                                            YR .
                                                                                                            l.VM
                                                                                                                    U  IUt
o
I
EXHAUST EMISSIONS

     RLUWEH DIP. PRf-SS., G?, *30.3 MM.
     HAG RESULTS
     RAG NO.
     HLOWFR REVOLUTIONS
     HC   SAMPLt  METtR READING/SCALE
     HC   SAMPLE  PPM
     HC   HACKGHD MI-TER READING/SCALE
     HC   HACKGHD PPM
     TO   SAMPLF  MtTEK READING/SCALE
     CO   SAMPLE  PPM
     CO   nACKlJRU MtTER READING/SCALE
     CO   BACKGRH PPM
     TO?  SAMPLE  METER READING/SCALE
     CO?  SAMPLE  PERCENT
     co?  DACKGHD MFTER READING/SCALE
     CO?  BACKGRO PERCENT
     NUX  SAMPLE  MFTER READING/SCALE
     NOX  SAMPLE  PPM
     NOX  flACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
     NOX  BACKGRD PPM
     SO?  SAMPLE  METER READING/SCALE
     SO?  SAMPLE  PPM
     SU?  HACKGRD MFTER RhADING/SCALE
     SO?  BACKGHI) PPM

     HC   CONCENTRATION PPM
     CD   CONCENTRATION PPM
     CO?  CONCENTRATION PCT
     NOX  CONCENTRATION PPM
     SO?  CONCENTRATION PPM
     HC   MASS GRAMS
     CO   MASS GRAMS
     CO?  MASS GRAMS
     NOX  MASS GRAMS
     SO?  MASS GRAMS
                                              H?0
           WEIGHTED MASS HC
           WEIGHTED MASS co
           WEIGHTED MASS COP
           WEIGHTED MASS NOX
           WEIGHTED MASS SO?
                            .83 GRAMS/KILOMETRE
                         HII.B? GRAMS/KILOMETRE
                            .79 GRAMS/KILOMETRE
                           o.oo GRAMS/KILOMETRE
                                                          1
                                                        79.
                                                          Rll
                                                        U.?/?
                                                          11
                                                        SH.3/*
                                                         HOH
                                                          .b/*
                                                           ?
                                                        11.0/3
                                                        1.70
                                                         3.b/3
                                                         .Ob
                                                        bb.O/?
                                                        bb.O
                                                          .7
                                                        -o.o/*
                                                        -n.o
                                                        -u.n/*
                                                        -o.o

                                                          70
                                                        l.bS
                                                        bS.f
                                                         u.o
                                                        3.52
                                                       Hb.57
                                                       10.30
                                                        0.00
       BLOWER INLET PRESS., Gl b98.5  MM.  H?l)
       BLOWER INLET TEMP.   f3 DEG. C

                      3
                   1?H7?
   18.
     18
     10
   55.
     SH
    l.l/*
      1
   55.5/3
    .17
    3.3/3
    .US
   10.H/2
     .5
   -O.U/*
   - II . U
   -O.O/*
   -O.I)
     •51
    .93
   lU.f
    O.U
    .77
   8.90
?5b3.8f
   ?.8H
   0.00
     ?5
   n.s/a
     u
   35.?/*
     3?
     .b/*
      1
   7R.H/3
   l.Hf
    H.0/3
    .Ob
                                                                                          ?b.O
     . q
   -o.o/*
   -o.o
   -o.o/*
   -0.0

     15
     30
   1.38
   ?S.?
    0.0
    ,7b
   3.08
?2S3.57
   3.98
   0.00
           FUEL ECONOMY HY CARBON  BALANCE  =    S.b   KILOMETRE/LITRE

-------
         UNIT MO.   EM9
         VEHICLE MODEL
      TEST NO. 1
NOVA CHEVROLET
         BAROMETER  7H3.tb  MM  OF  HG.
         DKY BULB TEMP.    S3.3  UEG.  C
         REL. HUMIDITY      58 PCT.
TABLE                   VEHICLE EMI33IUN RESULTS
                1175  LIGHT DUTY EMISSIONS TEST
          DATE 11/29/77                     MFGR. CODE   -0
          ENGINE   5.71 LITRE 8             CURB WT.     0 KG

                                       WET BULB TEMP  17.8 DEG.  C
                                        AbS. HUMIDITY   10.b  GHAMS/KG
YR.
GVM
                                                                                                                              0 KG
         EXHAUST EMISSIONS
O
BLOWER DIP. PRESS., 62, b73.1 MM. H20
RAG RESULTS
RAG NO.
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
HC SAMPLE METER
HC SAMPLE PPM
HC BACKGRD METER
HC BACKGRD PPM
CO SAMPLE METER
CO SAMPLE PPM
CO BACKGRD METER
CO BACKGRD PPM
C02 SAMPLE METER



READING/SCALE

READING/SCALE

READING/SCALE

READING/SCALE

READING/SCALE
C02 SAMPLE PERCENT
C02 BACKGRD METER
READING/SCALE
C02 BACKGRD PERCENT
NOX SAMPLE METER
MOX SAMPLE PPM
NOX BACKGRD METER
NOX BACKGRD PPM
S02 SAMPLE METER
S02 SAMPLE PPM
S02 BACKGRD METER
S02 BACKGRD PPM
HC CONCENTRATION
CO CONCENTRATION
C02 CONCENTRATION
NOX CONCENTRATION
S02 CONCENTRATION
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
C02 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
S02 MASS GRAMS
WEIGHTED MASS HC
WEIGHTED MASS co
WEIGHTED MASS coa
WEIGHTED MASS NOX
WEIGHTED MASS S02
READING/SCALE

READING/SCALE

READING/SCALE

READING/SCALE

PPM
PPM
PCT
PPM
PPM



i
tU81b
8b.b/2
87
b.7/2
7
b9.8/*
297
.3/*
1
9H.9/3
1.78
3.9/3
.Ob
79.5/2
79.5
1.3/2
1.3
-U.O/*
-0.0
-O.O/*
-0.0
81
afll
1.73
78.*
0.0
3. Ml
as. at
atSS.tb


.20 GRAMS/KILOMETRE
1.42 GRAMS/KILOMETRE
373. bb GRAMS/KILOMETRE
.99 GRAMS/KILOMETRE
o.oo GRAMS/KILOMETRE
11.53
0.00





                                                                                BLOWER INLET PRESS., Gl b73.1  MM.  H20
                                                                                BLOWER INLET TEMP:   He DEG. C
                                                      2
                                                   b9840
                                                    13.0/8
                                                      13
                                                     7.3/a
                                                       7
                                                    35. 5/*
                                                      3t
                                                      .S/*
                                                       0
                                                    57.3/3
                                                    1.01
                                                     3.9/3
                                                     .Ob
                                                    1H.2/2
                                                    It. S
                                                     i.o/a
                                                     1.0
                                                    -O.O/*
                                                    -O.D
                                                    -O.O/*
                                                    -0.0
                                                                             .15
                                                                            13.3
                                                                             0.0
                                                                         2317.71
                                                                            3.34
                                                                            0.00
                                                                                               3
                                                                                            40800
                                                                                             ai.t/a
                                                                                               21
                                                                                              7.8/2
                                                                                                8
                                                                                             31. b/*
                                                                                               30
                                                                                               .5/*
                                                                                                0
                                                                                             79.b/3
                                                                                             l.tb
                                                                                              H.a/3
                                                                                              .Ob
                                                    29. •»
                                                     1.0/2
                                                     1.0
                                                    -O.O/*
                                                    -0.0
                                                    -O.O/*
                                                    -0.0

                                                      If
                                                      28
                                                    l.f 0
                                                    28.5
                                                     0.0
                                                     .bt
                                                    2.52
                                                 1992.35
                                                    •K19
                                                    0.00
              FUEL  ECONOMY  BY  CARBON BALANCE =   b.2  KILOMETRE/LITRE

-------
UNM NO.   11
VEHICLL MUOtL
      TEST NO. «
1S75 CHEVY NOVA
 TABLE                    VEHICLE EMISSION KFSULTS
                 1975   LIGHT  DUTY EMISSIONS TEST
'           DATE  11/30/77                      MFGH. CODE
           ENGINE    5.74  LITRE 8             CURB WT.
-0
0 KG
YH.
liVM
lH7b
   U KG
BAWOMFItR 73H.H9 MM OF HP.
DRY HIILB TEMP.   23.9 DEG. C
REL. HUMIDITY     28 PCT.

EXHAUST EMISSIONS
BLOWER DIP. PRbSS., U2, bSS.O MM. H20
RAG KESULTS
HAU NO.
HLOwtR REVOLUTIONS
HC SAMPLE METER READING/SCALE
HC SAMPLE PPM
HC HACKGRD MtTER READING/SCALE
HC HACKGHD PPM
CO SAMPLE METER READING/SCALE
CO SAMPLE PPM
CO BACKGRU MtTEH READING/SCALE
CO HACKGRD PPM
ro? SAMPLE METER READING/SCALE
C02 SAMPLE PERCENT
C02 BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
r.02 BACKGRl) PERCENT
NOX SAMPLE METER READING/SCALE
NCIX SAMPLE PPM
NOX BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
MIX BACKGRU PPM
S02 SAMPLE METER READING/SCALE
502 SAMPLE PPM
S02 HACKGRO MtTER READING/SCALE
S02 BACKGRD PPM
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
S02 CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS


1
HObbS
S4.S/2
95
7.7/2
8
25. 3/3
5S7
. 1/3
2
97.3/3
1.B3
4. 3/3
.07
87.0/2
87.0
1.4/2
1.4
-O.O/*
-0.0
-O.O/*
-0.0
88
559
1.77
85. H
O.U
3.91
49.95
C02 MASS GRAMS 250b.b5
NOX MASS GRAMS
302 MASS GRAMS
WEIGHTED MASS HC .22 GRAMS/KILOMETRE
WEIGHTED MASS co 3.38 GRAMS/KILOMETRE
WEIGHTED MASS C02 383. Sb GRAMS/KILOMETRE
WEIGHTED MASS NOX .81 GRAMS/KILOMETRE
WEIGHTED MASS S02 U.OO GRAMS/KILOMETRE
10.70
U.OO





                                                       WET  BULB  TEMP   13.3  DEC.  C
                                                         ABS. HUMIDITY    5.3  GRAM3/KG
                                                                       BLOWER  INLET PRFSS.r  Gl b47.7 MM. H20
                                                                       SLOWER  INLET TEMP.    42 OEG. C
                                                                     2
                                                                  b9793
                                                                   lb.0/2
                                                                     Ib
                                                                    7.8/5
                                                                      8
                                                                   se.o/*
                                                                    115
                                                                    1 .2/*
                                                                      S
                                                                   59.0/3
                                                                   1.0*
                                                                    4.1/3
                                                                    .Ob
                                                                   14.5/2
                                                                   1H.5
                                                                    1.1/2
                                                                    1.1
                                                                   -o.o/*
                                                                   -0.0
                                                                   -o.u/*
                                                                   -o.u
                                                                    llu
                                                                    .IS
                                                                   13.5
                                                                    0.0
                                                                    .b?
                                                                  lb.84
                                                                2387.45
                                                                   2. 89
                                                                   O.OU
                                                                       3
                                                                   4Ubll
                                                                     21.1/2
                                                                       21
                                                                      8.1/2
                                                                       8
                                                                     54.O/*
                                                                       52
                                                                      l.b/*
                                                                       2
                                                                     81.7/3
                                                                     1.50
                                                                      3.8/3
                                                                      .Ob
                                                                     33.0/2
                                                                     33.0
                                                                       .9/2
                                                                       .9
                                                                     -O.O/*
                                                                     -0.0
                                                                     -o.o/*
                                                                     -0.0

                                                                       14
                                                                       48
                                                                     1.45
                                                                     32.2
                                                                      0.0
                                                                      .be
                                                                     4.31
                                                                  20*1.41
                                                                     4.01
                                                                     0.00
     FUEL  ECONOMY BY CARBON BALANCE =   b.O  KILOMETRE/LITRE

-------
UNIT NO.
VEHICLE MODEL
NOVA
      TEST NO. *
TABLE                   VEHICLE EMISSION RESULTS
                1975  LIGHT DUTY EMISSIONS TEST
          DATE  12/12/77                     MFGR.  CODE
          ENGINE    5.71 LITRE  H             CURB WT.
-0
0 KG
YR.
GVM
1975
   0 KG
BAROMETER 713.1h MM OF HG.
DRY BULB TEMP.   ?5.h DEC. C
REL. HUMIDITY     ID PCT.

EXHAUST EMISSIONS
BLOWER OIF. PRESS., G2, b17.7 MM. HeO
RAG RESULTS
BAG NO.
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
HC SAMPLE METER READING/SCALE
HC SAMPLE PPM
HC RACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
HC RACKGRD PPM
co SAMPLE METER READING/SCALE
CO SAMPLE PPM
co BACKGPD METER READING/SCALE
CO BACKGRD PPM
co? SAMPLE METER READING/SCALE
C02 SAMPLE PERCENT
coe 8ACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
co2 BACKGRD PERCENT
NOX SAMPLE METER READING/SCALE
NOX SAMPLE PPM
NOX BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
NOX BACKGRD PPM
so2 SAMPLE METER READING/SCALE
S02 SAMPLE PPM
S02 BACKGRO METER READING/SCALE
SO? BACKGRD PPM
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
S02 CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS


1
10b89
11.7/3
117
2,2/3
22
25.7/3
59b
.1/3
2
95,5/3
1.79
1,9/3
,08
17.0/2
17.0
1.1/2
1.1
-O.O/*
-0,0
-o.o/*
-0.0
98
5bb
1.73
Ib.l
0,0
1.3b
S0,8b
C02 MASS GRAMS 2153. H8
NOX MASS GRAMS
802 MASS GRAMS
WEIGHTED MASS HC .18 GRAMS/KILOMETRE
WEIGHTED MASS CO 2.81 GRAMg/K ILOMETRE
WEIGHTED MASS co? 399.11 GRAMS/KILOMETRE
WEIGHTED MASS NOX .bl GRAMS/KILOMETRE
WEIGHTED MASS 302 O.tlO GRAMJ/K ILOMETRE
b.29
0.00





                                                       WET BULB TEMP  ib.7 OEG. C
                                                        ABS. HUMIDITY   8.3 GRAMS/KG
                                                                      BLOWER INLET PRESS., Gl b17.7 MM. H20
                                                                      BLOWER INLET TEMP.   13 OEG. C
                                                                    I
                                                                 b98l3
                                                                  2b,2/2
                                                                    2b
                                                                  88.7/2
                                                                    29
                                                                  81.5/*
                                                                    81
                                                                   b.9/*
                                                                     7
                                                                  b3.0/3
                                                                  1.12
                                                                   1.9/3
                                                                   .OS
                                                                  11.0/2
                                                                  11.0
                                                                   1.0/2
                                                                   1.0
                                                                  •O.D/*
                                                                  -0.0
                                                                  -o.o/*
                                                                  -0,0

                                                                    -0
                                                                    7?
                                                                  1.05
                                                                  10,1
                                                                   0.0
                                                                  -.01
                                                                 11.13
                                                               25bb.be
                                                                  2.37
                                                                  0.00
                                                                      3
                                                                   10bb2
                                                                    3t.0/2
                                                                      31
                                                                    2f.0/2
                                                                      21
                                                                    33.O/*
                                                                      31
                                                                     b.7/*
                                                                       7
                                                                    B3.b/3
                                                                    1.5*
                                                                     H.9/3
                                                                     ,08
                                                                    35.3/2
                                                                    35.3
                                                                      .9/2
                                                                      .9
                                                                    -O.O/*
                                                                    -0.0
                                                                    -o.o/*
                                                                    -0.0

                                                                      13
                                                                      21
                                                                    1.18
                                                                    31.5
                                                                     0.0
                                                                     .57
                                                                    2.17
                                                                 2095.70
                                                                    1.71
                                                                    0.00
     FUEL ECONOMY RY CARBON BALANCE 6   5.8  KILOMETRE/LITRE

-------
D
CO
UNIT mi.   11       1E3T  NO.
vi- H i r.i t Miinri.  NOVA  FM-H

HAKII:H  mi 7n.hs  MM  OF  HI;.
l>Hr Hill H  I I "P.    23.3  DFG.  C
HFL. HUMIDITY      51 PC F .

EXHAUST F MISSIONS
        DIF.  PRESS., G?, b73.1 MM.  H2H
 HAI,  KFSULT3
 HAI,  NO.
 HLOrttH  KEVOLUTION3
 HC    SAMPLE   Ml- FFR «t AD ING/SC ALE
 HC    SAMPLE   PPM
 HC    HACKGRO METE>< RfcADING/SCALE
 HC    HACKGUO PPM
 m    SAMPLE   MhTFR READING/SCALE
 TO    SAMPLE   PPM
 Til    HACKGRO METER KFADING/SCALE
 TO    BACKGRD PPM
 rev   SAMPLE   MFTER READING/SCALE
 ro?   SAMPLE:   PERCENT
 CU?   BACKGRO METER RFAD ING/SCALE
 TO?   HACKGRD PERCENT
 NOX   SAMPLE   METER READING/SCALE
 MOX   SAMPLE   PPM
 NUX   HACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
 NOX   BACKGRI) PPM
 SU?   SAMPLE   MFTER READING/SCALE
 SO?   SAMPLE   PPM
 SO?   BACKGHU METER READING/SCALE
 SO?   BACKGHU PPM

 HC    CONCENTRATION PPM
 CU    CONCENTRATION PPM
 CUP   CONCENTRATION PCT
 NOX   CONCENTRATION PPM
 SO?   CONCENTRATION PPM
 HC    MASS  GHAMS
 CO    MASS  GRAMS
 CO?   MASS  GRAMS
 NUX   MASS  GRAMS
 S02   MASS  GRAMS
HC GKAMS/KM  (GRAMS/MILE)
CU GRAMS/KM  (GRAMS/MILE)
CO? GHAMS/KM  (GRAMS/MILE)
NOX GRAMS/KM  (GRAMS/MILE)
FUEL  CONSUMPTION  HY CB  L/100KM (MPG)
TVS FLU* STI).  CU.  METRES  (SCf-)
CALCULATED DISTANCE KM(MILES)
           FUEL CONSUMPTION LITRES/1UOKM  (MPG)
  HEIGHTFO MASS HC  GRAMS/KM (GHAMS/MlLF)
  WEIGHIfO MASS CO  UHAMS/Kl- I GH AMS/M 1 LF )
           HASS CO? UHAMS/KM (RHAMS/MILE)
           MASS NOX liH»MS/HM (GHAMS/MILF)
           _  i vr, FL<>» »   ?HH.a mi>. cu.  MITRFS
                                    TAHLF.                   VF.HICLE EMISSION  RESULTS
                                                        1978  LIGHT DUTY  EMISSIONS TEST
                                                  ACTUAL OISTANCtS USED  IN CALCULATIONS
                                       1       DATE 12/3U/77                      MFGR.  CODE
                                              ENGINE   5.7* LITRE 8              CURB HT.
                                                                                      -0
                                                                                      0 KU
YR.
UVM
1975
   U KG
                                                                            WFT  BULB TEMP  17.2 DEC. C
                                                                             ABS.  HUMIDITY  10.0 GRAMS/KG
                                                                             COMMENTS  1978 FTPC
                                                                            BLOWER  INLET PRESS., Gl b?3.1 MM.  H20
                                                                            BLOHER  INLET TEMP.   H2 DEG. C
1
HII77II
12. 0/ 3
120
.9/ 3
9
BH.b/11
101
.8/11
2
95. 5/ 3
1.79
3.b/ 3
.Ob
38, b/ 2
3R.b
,9/ 2
. 9
-II.O/-0
-n. n
-n.ii/-o
-11. 0
112
378
1.75
37.8
(1.0
H.9b
33.71
52.17
5.»2
o.no
.Rb ( 1 .
b.82 ( 9.
22. 7* (bBn.
.93 ( 1.
18.55 ( 12.
7b.7 (2708
5.80 ( 3.
17.09
.28
l.Hb
39b.t-b
. b?
2
b97-»7
19. I/ 2
19
10. b/ 2
11
S.H/1J
5
3.2/13
3
b2.t/ 3
1.11
3.b/ 3
.Ob
13. 2/ Z
13.?
.9/ 2
.9
-O.U/-0
-0.0
-0.il/-0
-0.0
9
2
I.Ob
12. 
2138.13
3.85
0.00
.17 (
2.31 ( 3.
3bS.Ob (587.
.bb ( 1.
15. 7b ( 1*.
7b."» (2b99
5.8b ( 3.





































27)
72)
38)
Ob)
93)
.if)
"}






-------
UNIT NO.  fMR
VEHICLE MODFL
    TEST Nd.
NOVA CHEVY
TABLE                   VEHICLE EMISSION RESULTS
                     1978   LIGHT DUTY EMISSIONS TEST
              ACTUAL  DISTANCES USED IN CALCULATIONS
  I        HATE  l/lb/78                      MFGR. CODE
          ENGINE   5.7H LITRE  8             CURB WT.
-U
0 KG
YR.
GVM
1975
   U KG
BAROMI-TER  71S.lt  MM  OF HG.
DRY flIILH TEMP.    23.3 HER. C
Rf.L. HUMJDITY      be f'CT.

EXHAUST FMTSSIOUS
HLOWER OIF. PRtSJi., G2, b?3.I MM.
MAG KFSULTS
HAG NO.
"LHHER Kt VOLUTIONS
HC SAMPLE METER READING/SCALE
HC SAMPLE PPM
HC t'.ACKGRO MtTE.fi READING/SCALE
HC HACKGRD PRM
CO SAMPLE MFTER READING/SCALE
TO SAMPLE PPM
CO HACKGRp ME1FR READING/SCALE
CO HACKGRD PPM
CO? SAMPLE METFR READING/SCALE
COe SAMPLE PIKCENT
ro? tiACKGRO MF.TFR READING/SCALE
CO? HACKGRD PERCENT
MOX SAMPLE METER HEADING/SCALE
MIU SAMPLE PPM
"I0> BACKGRD MFTER READING/SCALE
NO> BACKGRD PPM
SOP SAMPLE METER Rt. AD I NG/SCALE
SO? SAMPLE PPh
SO? BACKGRO METF.R READING/SCALE
SO? RACKGKU PPM
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
TO CONCENTRATION PPM
CO? CONCENTRATION PCT
MOX CONCENTRATION PPM
SO? CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
C 0 
-------
(in I T no.   E Mq
VF HJCI E  MdpFL
                           1 F S T Mi
                       NOVA C H (• V Y
                      1AM F                    VFIUCLE EMISSION  RESULTS
                                            197R   LIGHT DUTY EMISSIONS TEST
                                     ACTUAL  ni.siANCts USFO  IN CALCULATIONS
                         1        OATE  1/1H/7R                       MFGR. CODE
                                 tNUINF   S.7t  LITRE R              CURB HT.
                                                                                             -n
                                                                                             0 KG
                                                                                                       VR.
                                                                                                       L.VM
HAHfiHF IF H  7t? . J 9 f
DRY HIILH  TEMP.    ;
HKL. HUMIDITY

F XHMI1T  F.M I-;s IONS
                             PCI .
D
 I
            BLOWER DIP.  PRFSS., GP,
            RAT, RESULTS
            HAT, MO.
            RLOHER F,E vriLUT in'.;-;
                    F, 7 3 . I  MM.  H?0
     HC
     HC
     HC
     HC
     CO
     CO
     r n
     rn
     co?
     CO?
     CO?
     rn?
     NOX
     NOX
     NOX
     NOX
     SO?
     SO?
     so?
     so?
SAK.PLF
.SAKPI.F
KACKGRO
BACKGRD
SAhFLE
                 liACKGhO
         ME TEFi
         PPH
         ME TF H
         PPM
         MF TE F*
         PF"-'.
         MF 1ER
SAhPLE
SAMPLE
BACKGRD
BACKGRO
SAMPLE
SAMPLE
RACKGHD
FiACKGRO
SAKPLF
SAMPLE
(IACKGRH
BACKGRD
                                KFAI.'ING/SCALE
                                FU AOTUG/SCALF
                                RF ADTNG/SC ALF
                                KF- APING/SCALE
                          METFH READING/SCALE
                          PERCFl-'T
                          METER READING/STALE
                          PERCENT
                          METER READING/SCALE
               RE AD I NG/ SI ALE
                                READING/SCALE
                                READING/SCALE
                   ME TFR
                   PPM
                   METEP
                   PPM
                   METER
                   PPM
            HC   CONCENTRATION PPM
            CO   CONCENTRATION PPM
            CO?  CONCENTRATION PCT
            NOX  CONCENTRATION PHM
            SO?  CONCENTRATION PPM
            HC   MASS GRAMS
            CO   MASS GRAMS
            CO?  MASS GRAMS
            NUX  MASS GRAMS
            SO?  MASS GkAMS
            HC GRAMS/KM  (GRAMS/MILE)
            CO GKAMS/KM  (GRAMS/MILE)
            CO? GKAMS/KM  ( GF. AMS/M ILF )
            NOX GRANS/KM  (GkAMS/MlLF)
            FUEL CONSUMPTION  BY  CB  L/JOOKM  (MPf,)
            CVS FLO* STO.  CU.  METRES (SCF)
            CALCULATED DISTANCE  KM(MILFS)
               FUFL COK'SUMPTInrJ L I T RF S/l MOKM  (MPR)
     WEIGHTED M*SS HC GR»MS/K^ (GWAnS/MlLE)
     VEIGHTFO MASS CO GRAMS/KM (GWAMS/MILE)
     V.E IGHTFO MASS CO?  GRAHS/HH ( t-P AHS/M I L E )
               MASS NOX  OBAMS/K" (i.^AMS/H ILF )
                Cws FIOM «    ?"«.«> ">m.  LU.  HETBFS
                                                                WET  BULB TEMP  11.1  OEG.  C
                                                                 ABS.  HUMIDITY    3.7 GRAMS/KG
                                                                 COMMENTS  1978-FTP-C
                                                                          BLOWER  INLET  PRESS., Gl  b73.1  MM. H?0
                                                                          BLOWER  INLET  TEMP.   13  DEC.  C
)
HflFib?
bS.3/ 2
bS
1. R/ ?
10
b?. 7/1 1
?55
.b/11
»2.bX ?
1 ,H9
1 . •»/ ?
.07
3H.7/ ?
38.7
l.l/ ?
1.1
-M.O/-0
-0.0
-0.0/-0
-11.0
57
?H3
1 .8?
37.8
11.0
2.5?
21 .bb
1.50
0.00
.*3 (
3.7? ( 5.
H38.17 (7(15.
.77 ( 1 .
19.01 ( 1?.
7b.7 (?708
5.82 ( 3.
17.19
. 1 9
. 92
inn . 77
.57
?
b973H
lb.3/ 2
Ib
q.O/ 2
9
7.H/13
7
1.8/13
b?.2/ 3
1.11
3.3/ 3
.05
It.O/ ?
1H.O
.5/2
.5
-0.0/-0
-0.0
-0.0/-0
-0.0
8
5
I.Ob
13.5
0.0
.bl
.8?
3 C U ^ U Q
C3jj»Di f
2.77
0.00
70) .10 ( .Ib)
«f8) .13 ( .21)
02) H03.79 (bH9.70)
?H) .HH ( .70)
37) 17. 2b ( 13. b3)
.H) 131.5 C»b»».«t)
b?) b.3? ( 3.93)
( 13. b8)
( .31)
( J . *9)
(bHf.RH)
( .91)
3
H0b25
33. H/ 2
33
9. 7/ 2
10
25.1/13
21
1.8/13
85. 3/ 3
1.58
3.b/ 3
.Ob
33. O/ ?
33.0
.b/ 2
.b
-0.0/-0
-0.0
-0.0/-0
-0.0
as
21
1.53
3a.s
0,0
1.10
1.11
3.87
0.00
.11 (
.33 (
3bb.92 (510.
.bb ( 1.
15.71 ( It.
7b.b (2705
5.8b ( 3.



































30)
52)
37)
Ob)
S8)
.8)
bH)






-------
                                TABLE
 UNIT NO.  EM9
 VEHICLE MODEL
         TEST NO.
     NOVA CHEVY
 BAROMETER 738.b3 MM OF HG.
 DRY BULB TEMP.   ??.? DEC. c
 REL. HUMIDITY     73 PCT.

 EXHAUST EMISSIONS

      BLOWER DIF. PRESS., G?, 73b.b MM.
      BAG RESULTS
      BAG NO.
      BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
      HC
      HC
      HC
      HC
      CO
      CO
      CO
      CO
      CO?
      COS
                                            VEHICLE EMISSION RESULTS
                                         197B  LIGHT DUTY EMISSIONS TEST
                                   ACTUAL DISTANCES USED IN CALCULATIONS
                               DATE  ?/?8/78                     MFGR. CODE   -0
                               ENGINE   5.74 LITRE H             CURB WT.     o KG

                                                            WET BULB TEMP  18.1 DEC.  C
                                                             ABS. HUMIDITY  IS.b GRAMS/KG
                                                             COMMENTS  1978 FTP-C
YR.
GVM
197b
   0 KG
                             H20
        METER READING/SCALE
        PPM
SAMPLE
SAMPLE
BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
BACKGRD PPM
SAMPLE  METER READING/SCALE
SAMPLE  PPM
BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
BACKGRD PPM
        METER READING/SCALE
        PERCENT
SAMPLE
SAMPLE
      CO?
      CO?
      NOX
      NOX
      NOX
      NOX
      SO?
      so?
      S02
      SO?
BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
BACKGRD PERCENT
SAMPLE  METER READING/SCALE
SAMPLE  PPM
BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
BACKGRD PPM
SAMPLE
SAMPLE
        METER READING/SCALE
        PPM
BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
BACKGRD PPM
      HC   CONCENTRATION PPM
      CO   CONCENTRATION PPM
      CO?  CONCENTRATION PCT
      NOX  CONCENTRATION PPM
      SO?  CONCENTRATION PPM
      HC   MASS GRAMS
      CO   MASS GRAMS
      C02  MASS GRAMS
      NOX  MASS GRAMS
      SO?  MASS GRAMS
      HC GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
      CO GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
      CO? GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
      NOX GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
      FUEL CONSUMPTION BY CB  L/100KM (MPG)
      CVS FLOW STD. CU. METRES (SCF)
      CALCULATED DISTANCE KM(MlLES)
WEIGHTED FUEL
WEIGHTED MASS
WEIGHTED MASS
WEIGHTED MASS
WEIGHTED MASS
    TOTAL CVS
   CONSUMPTION LITRES/100KM (MPG)
   HC GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
   CO GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
   CO? GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
   NOX GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
   FLOW =   ?8H.S STD.  CU.  METRES
                                                            BLOWER INLET PRESS.,  61 73b.b MM.  H?0
                                                            BLOWER INLET TEMP.    43 DEG.  C
40bl8
84. 3/ 2
84
1? .O/ 2
1?
7?.b/ll
315
.7/11
?
4b.4/ 2
2.08
1.7/ 2
.Ob
23. 9/ 2
?3.9
.8/2
.8
-0.0/-0
-0.0
-0.0/-0
-0.0
74
293
2.03
23.2
II. 0
3.23
25.79
280b.01
3.58
0.00
.55 (
4.41 ( 7.
479.98 (77?.
.bl (
20. 8b ( 11.
75.5 (2bbb
5.85 ( 3.
19. 5b
.21
I.b7
454.91
.44
b9b50
21. O/ 2
?1
13. S/ 2
13
17.5/13
17
l.b/13
2
72. 3/ 3
1.31
4.0/ 3
.Ob
9.3/ 2
9.3
.5/ 2
.5
-0.0/-0
-0.0
-0.0/-0
-0.0
9
IS
1.2b
8.8
0.0
.bb
2.19
297b.Sl
2.34
0.00
89) .10 ( .17)
10) .34 ( .55)
29) 4bB.bl (753.99)
98) .37 ( .59)
28) 20.04 ( 11.74)
.2) 129.4 (4571.5)
b3) b.35 ( 3.95)
( 12.03)
( !s3)
( 2.b8)
(731. 9b)
( .71)
40bl2
3b.3/ 2
3b
19. S/ 2
IS
fab. 8/12
150
.b/12
1
94. 2/ 3
1.77
3. 1/ 3
.05
17. b/ 2
17. b
.b/ 2
.b
-0.0/-0
-0.0
-0.0/-0
-0.0
19
141
1.73
17.1
0.0
.84
12.38
2384.50
2.b3
0.00
.15 (
2.13 ( 3.
409. 7b (bS9.
.45 (
17. bS ( 13.
75.5 (2bb5
5.82 ( 3.




































23)
42)
30)
73)
33)
.b)
b2)






-------
                                TABLE
D
I-1
to
                                             FXHAUST FM1SSIONS FROM  SINGLE  BAG  SAMPLE
                                                   VEHICLE NUMBER
                         DATE  ?/?8/7R
                         MODEL  lc»75 MUVA CHEVY
                         ORIVER   BP
                         WET BULR TEMP  Jq C
                         SPEC. HUM.  ll.i* GUAM/KG
                         TIMt    -U HRS.
                         SET-7
                         TEST WT.   1R1"»  KG.
                         DRY BULB  TEMP   ?9  C
                         BARD.   738.4 MM  HG.
                     TEST NO.  2
                     ENGINE 5.7 LITREV R
                     GVW    0 KG
                     REL. HUM.  Sb.l PCT
                     MEASURED FUEL  o.on KG
                           RUN DURATION
                           BLOWER INLET PRESS.
                           RLOWKR OIF.  PRESS.
                           BLOWER INLET TEMP.
                           DYNO RF VOLUTIONS
                           BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
                           BLOWER co. CM /KEV.
                     83.23 MINUTES
                    73b.h  MM. H20
                           MM  H?0
                    73h.h
                       44
                    31SH3
DEG. C
                                                SP31
                                        METER READING/SCALE
                                        PPM
                                BACKGRD MtTtR READING/SCALE
                                BACKGRD PPM
                                SAMPLE  METER READING/SCALE
                                SAMPLE  PPM
                                BACKGHD METER READING/SCALE
BAG RESULTS
 HC  SAMPLE
 HC  SAMPLE
 HC
 HC
 CO
 CO
 cn
 CO  BACKGHD PPM
 CO? SAMPLE  METER READING/SCALE
 CO? SAMPLE  PERCENT
 CO? BACKGRO METER READING/SCALE
 CO? BACKGRD PERCENT
 NOX SAMPLE  METFR READING/SCALE
 NOX SAMPLE  PPM
 NOX BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
 NOX BACKGRO PPM
     CONCENTRATION PPM
     CONCENTRATION PPM
 CO? CONCENTRATION PCT
 NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
 SO? COCENTRATION PPM
     MASS (GRAMS)
     MASS (GRAMS)
                            HC
                            CO
                            HC
                            CO
                            CO?  MASS (GRAMS)
                            NOX  MASS (GRAMS)
                            SO?  MASS (GRAMS)

                         HC   GRAMS/KILOMETRE      .07
                         CO   GRAMS/KILOMETRE     1.95
                         CO? GRAMS/KILOMETRE   351
                         NOX GRAMS/KILOMETRE      .47
                         SO? GRAMS/KILOMETRE     0.00

                         HC   GRAMS/KG OF FUEL    .b5
                         CO   GRAMS/KG OF FUEL   17.5
                         CO? GRAMS/KG OF FUEL   3140
                         NOX GRAMS/KG OF FUEL   4.?4
                         SO? GRAMS/KG OF FUEL   O.OU
                80. q/*
                 187
                  ,5/*
                   1
                H5.9/?
                2. OS
                 1.7/2
                 .Ob
                  .8/2
                  .8
                  13
                 17b
                2.00
                25. •»
                0.0
                1.57
               f2.sn
             7bf 1.20
               1U.33
                0.00
                              HC  GRAMS/MIN     .07
                              CO  GRAMS/MIN     1.8
                              CO? GRAMS/MIN     3?q
                              NOX GRAMS/MIN     .*H
                              SO? GRAMS/MIN   n.UO
                         CARHON BALANCC FUEL ECONOMY =   15.11* LITRES PER HUNDRED  KILOMETERS

-------
                               TABLE
                                            EXHAUST EMISSIONS FROM SINGLE BAG SAMPLE
                                                  VEHICLE NUMBER EM9
7
M
W
                        DATE   2/28/7B              TIME    -0 HRS.        TEST NO.   2
                        MODEL   1R7R NOVA CHEVY     SET-7                  ENGINE 5.7 LITREO
                        RUN DURATION   53.23 MIN.  DISTANCE DRIVEN  21.78 KILOMETRES
                        CVS BLOWCR TEST VOL.  etq.7li ACT. CU. METRES
                           SAMPLE
SULFATE DATA               	

 FILTER NO.              H7FH-28qb
 SAi-tPLE VOL. CU. FT.        lb.2b
 SAMPLE TEMP. OEG. F            si
 SAMPLE AREA SO. IN.    221530.00
 DILUTION FACTOR                 1
 STAND. DEN. MICROG/ML       5.00
 STAND. AREA SU. IN.    11VU7S.OO
 SOt,MJCROG/FILTER         7b.877

SULFUR DIOXIDE DATA

 SAMPLE VOL. cu. FT.         i.oo
 SAMPLE TEMP. DEG. F            70
 AREA,BUBBLER 1              0.00
 OIL. FACT.,BUBBLER 1            1
 AREA,BUBBLER 2              0.00
 OIL. FACT.,BUBBLER 2            1
 STAND. DEN. MICROG/ML       1.00
 STAND. AREA,SO. IN.         1.00
 S02, MILLIG/BUBBLER 1      0.000
 305, MILLIG/BUBBLER 2      0.000
 S08, PPM                      (l.O

SULFATE AND S02 EMISSIONS

 NET SULFATE,MILLIGRAM/TEST
 NET H5SOH,MILLIGRAM/TEST
 NET sos,GRAM/TEST
 NET SULFATE,MILLIGRAM/KILOMETRE
 NET nesot,MILLIGRAM/KILOMETRE
 NET 302,GRAM/KILOMETRE
                                                              •J7.575
                                                              18.571*
                                                               0.000
                                                               2.185
                                                               2.231
                                                               o.onn
                                                                          BACKGROUND
                                                                               1 .00
                                                                                 70
                                                                               0.00
                                                                                  1
                                                                               1.00
                                                                               I .00
                                                                             0.000
       1.00
         70
       0.00
          1
       0.00
          1
       1.00
       1.00
      0.000
      0.000
        0.0
                        SULFUR BALANCE
                         FUEL KT., ?t3f GRAMS
                                   SULFUR,GRAMS
                                   PCT. RECOVERY
                          SULFUR  IN  FUEL,  .0310  PCT.
                           FUEL       S02       HSSOt
                                                    .75
                                     0.000
                                      n.oo
.0159
 2.11
S02 + H2SOH

    .015S
     2.11

-------
                             TABLF
                                          EXHAUST  EMISSIONS  FROM  SINGLE  BAG  SAMPLE
                                                VEHICLE  NUMBER  EMq
D
I
                     DATE  CVTR/7H
                     MODEL   1^75  NOVA  CHEVY
                     DRIVER   HP
                     WET HULH TEMP   IB  C
                     SPEC. HUM.   10.»  GRAM/KG
                            TIME     -o  HRS.
                            FET  FM-q
                            TEST  WT.  1R1H  KG.
                            DRY  BULB TEMP  2b  C
                            BARO.   738.H  MM   HG.
        TEST NO.  3
        ENGINE 5.7 LITREV R
        GVH    0 KG
        REL. HUM.  fq.7 PCT
        MEASURED FUEL  U.OM KG
                       RUN DURATION
                       RLUWER  INLET  PRESS.
                       PLOWEW  DIF.   PRESS.
                       BLOWER  INLET  TtMP.
                       DYNO REVOLUTIONS
                       BLOWER  REVOLUTIONS
                       BLOWER  CU. CM  /REV.
                        12.7b  MINUTES
                       73b.b   MM.  H20
                       73b.h   MM   H20
                          It   OEG.  C
                       23715
                         b!5H5
                        2831
  RAG Kt.SiJLTS
   HC  SAMPLE   MfTFH  READING/SCALE
   HC  SAMPLE   PPM
   HC  BACKGRD  METER  READING/SCALE
   HC  BACHGHD  PPM
   CO  SAMPLE   METER  READING/SCALE
   CO  SAMPLE   PPM
   CO  BACKGRtf  METER  READING/SCALE
   CO  rtACKGRI)  PPM
   CO? SAMPLE   METER  HEADING/SCALE
   CO? SAMPLE   PERCENT
   C02 HACKGRO  METEH  READING/SCALE
   C02 BACKGRU  PERCENT
   NOX SAMPLE   METER  READING/SCALE
   NOX SAMPLE   PPM
   NOX BACKGRD  METER  RFADING/SCALE
   NOX UACKGHU  PPM
   HC  CIINCENTKATION  PPM
   CO  CONCENTRATION  PPM
   COS CONCENTRATION  PCT
   NOX CONCENTRATION  PPM
   S08 COCENTRATION PPM
   HC  MASS (GRAMS)
   CO  MASS (GRAMS)
   CO? MASS (GRAMS)
   NOX MASS (GRAMS)
   SO? MASS (GRAMS)

HC  GRAMS/KILOMETRE       .ns
co  GRAMS/KILOMETRE       .50
CO? GRAMS/KILOMETRE   3?H
MOX GKAMS/KILOMETRE       .50
SO? GRAMS/KILOMETRE     n.dl)

HC  GRAMS/KG OF FUEL    .*7
CO  GRAMS/KG OF FUEL    ». 8
CO? GRAMS/KG OF FUEL    31hO
NOX GRAMS/KG OF FUEL    H.R>»
SO? GRAMS/KG OF FUEL    n.Oll
                                                                     2?
     13
   bB.l/*
     bb
    l.l/*
      1
   55.1/2
   2.58
    1.7/2
    .lib
   3H.2/2
   38.2
     .8/2
     .8
     12
     bl
   2.53
   37. b
   0.0
    .71
   8.12
S3fH.SO
   8.12
   o.on
                                                     HC  GRAMS/MIN     .Ob
                                                     CO  GRAMS/MIN      ,b
                                                     C02 GRAMS/MIN     <»ib
                                                     NOX GRAMS/MIN     .bH
                                                     SO? GRAMS/MIN    o.OU
                     CARBON BALANCE FUEL ECONOMY =   13.91 LITRES  PER  HUNDRED  KILOMETERS

-------
     UNIT Nil.  EMS
     VEHICLE MODEL
      TEST NO.
NOVA CHEVY
     BAROMETER  73H.12  KM  OF  HG.
     DRY BULH TEMP.    20.h  Ukfi. C
     REL. HUMIDITY      51  PCT.
      TABLE                    VEHICLE EMISSION  RESULTS
                       1175  LIGHT DUTY EMISSIONS  TEST
                 DATE   3/  2/78                      MFGR.  CODE   -II
                 ENGINE    5.7H LITRE 8              CURB WT.      (J KG

                                               WET  BULH  TEMP   15.b DtG. C
                                               AUS.  HUMIDITY   1.2 GRAMS/KG
                            YR.
                            bVM
117b
   0 KG
     EXHAUST EMISSIONS

          BLOWER DIP. PFHSS.,
          BAG RESULTS
          BAG NO.
          BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
Gd, 73b.h MM. H20
o
HC
HC
HC
HC
CO
Cu
CO
CU
CO?
C02
C02
CO?
NOX
NOX
NOX
NOX
S02
3D 2
S02
R02
HC
CO
C02
NUX
S02
HC
CO
C02
NOX
S02
SAKPLE MKTER
SAKPLt PPM
BACKGRD METER
BACKGRU PPM
SAMPLE METER
SAMPLE PPK
HACKGKO ME1FR
HACKGhiO PPM
SAMPLE METER
READING/SCALE

READING/SCALE

READING/SCALE

REAOIi-jG/SCALE

READING/SCALE
SArtPuE PERCENT
BACKGSD METER
READING/SCALE
BACKGRO PERCENT
SAMPLE METER
SAf.PLE PPH
BACKGRO METER
BACKGRO PPM
SAMPLE MfcTER
SAMPLE PPM
BACKG^O METER
BACKGRD PPM
CONCENTRATION
CONCENTRATION
CONCENTRATION
CUNCtNTRAl ION
CONCENTRATION
MASS GRAMS
MASS GRAMS
MASS GRAMS
MASS GRAMS
MASS GRAMS
READING/SCALE

READING/SCALE

READING/SCALE

READING/SCALE

PPM
PPM
PCT
PPM
PPM





                                     1
                                  •HI5B5
                                   b?.b/2
                                     bS
                                                          13
                                                        b5.7/*
                                                         275
                                                         5. I/*
                                                           b
                                                        tb.3/8
                                                        e.08
                                                         .07
                                                        31. fa/2
                                                        31. b
                                                          .f
                                                        -ll.fi/*
                                                        -n.u
                                                        -n.n/*
                                                        -o.o

                                                          57
                                                         251
                                                        2.02
                                                        31.3
                                                         0.0
                                                        2.tb
                                                       22.03
                                                     2717.13
                                                        H.21
                                                        0.00
                                          21.H/2
                                            22
                                          13.b/e
                                            1H
                                          22. (I/*
                                            21
                                           t.b/*
                                             t
                                                                         1.31
                                                                          H.2/3
                                                                          .Ob
                                                       .f
                                                     -O.O/*
                                                     -0.0
                                                     -O.O/*
                                                     -0.0

                                                       10
                                                       Ib
                                                     1.2b
                                                      1.5
                                                      0.0
                                                      .71
                                                     2.f 1
                                                 2182.11
                                                     2.25
                                                     0.00
                                                         BLOWER INLET PRESS.,  Gl  73b.b  MM.  H20
                                                         BLOWER INLET TEMP.    <*i  DEG.  c
     3
  40512
   31.5/2
     31
   11.8/2
     12
   7b.2/*
     75
    2.2/*
      2
   It.8/3
   1.78
    3.7/3
    .Ob
   21.0/2
   21.0
     .3/2
     .3
   -O.O/*
   -0.0
   -O.O/*
   -0.0

     21
     bl
   1.73
   20.7
    0.0
    .12
   b.08
5318.11
   2.85
   0.00
          WEIGHTED  MASS  HC
          WEIGHTED  MASS  co
          WEIGHTED  MASS  C02
          WEIGHTED  MASS  NOX
          WEIGHTFC  MASS  S02
              .11  GRAMS/KILOMETRE
             1.27  GRAMS/KILOMETRE
          thU.|l7  GRAMS/KILOMETRE
              .17  GKAMS/KILOMETRE
             I).DM  GMMS/KILOMETRE
          FUEL Kr.OUOfY  BY  CARBON BALANCE =   5.1   KILOMETRE/LITRE

-------
                               TAHLE
                                            EXHAUST EMISSIONS FROM  SINGLE  BAT.  SAMPLE
                                                  VEHICLE NUMBER
                       DMF   3 /  f / 7 R
                       MOPtL   1175  NI
                       DRIVl.R    BP
                       WET  BULB  TEMP
                       SPFC.  HUM.
                     TIME     -ii  MRS.
          CHEVY      SET  7
                     1EST WT.   1H11  KG.
          - C         DRY  BULB  T£MP   ?l  C
          GUAM/KG    BARO.   737.1  MM   HG.
                                                    TEST  NO.   2
                                                    ENGINE  5.7 LITREv R
                                                    GVW     n  KG
                                                    REL.  HUM.   51.1 PCT
                                                    MEASURED  FUEL  O.UO KG
                          RUN  DURATION
                          BLOWER  INLET PRESS.
                          RLIHER  OIF.   PRESS.
                          BLOWER  INLKT TEMP.
                          OYNO RF.VOLUTIOf4S
                          PltlWER  REVOLUTIONS
                          BLOWER  CU.  CM /REV.
                        23.28 MINUTES
                       73b.b  MM. H?0
                       73b.b  MM  H20
                          13  OEG. C
O
M
cn
   HAG
    HC
    HC
    HC
    HC
    CO
    CO
    CO
    CO
    CO?
    COS
    co?
    CO?
    NOX
    NOX
    NOX
    NOX
    HC
    CO
    CO?
    NOX
    SOP
    HC
    CO
    CO?
    NOX
    so?
                              RESULTS
                               SAMPLE
                               SAKPLE
        METFR READING/SCALE
        PPM
BACKGRt) METER READING/SCALE
BACKGKU PPM
SAMPLE
SAMPLE
        MFTI-R  READING/SCALE
        PPM
BACKGRI) MtTER  READING/SCALE
BACKGKD PPM
SAMPLE  MfcTER  READING/SCALE
SAMPLE  PERCENT
BACKGRI) METER  READING/SCALE
8ACKGRD PERCENT
SAMPLE  METFR  READING/SCALE
SAMPLE  PPM
BACKGKU MEUR  READING/SCALE
RACKGRU PPM
CONCENTRATION  PPM
CONCENTRATION  PPM
CONCENTRATION  PCT
CONCENTRATION  PPM
COCENTRATION PPM
MASS (GRAMS)
MASS (GRAMS)
MASS (GRAMS)
MASS (GRAMS)
MASS (GRAMS)
                                       81.0/2
                                         21
                                        I.1*/?
                                          q
                                        157
                                         .h/*
                                          1
                                       15.1/2
                                       e.ui
                                        1.8/2
                                        .07
                                       28.0/2
                                       28.0
                                         .5/2
                                         .5
                                         13
                                        117
                                       l.lb
                                       27. b
                                       0.0
                                       l.Sb
                                      35.58
                                    7182. b8
                                      lO.bO
                                       o.no
HC  GRAMS/KILOMETRE       .n?
CO  GRAMS/KILOMETRE      I.b2
CO? GRAMS/KILOMETRE    311
NMX GRAMS/KILOMETRE       .18
SO? GRAMS/KILOMETRE      tl.OO

HC  GRAMS/KG OF  FUEL     .bb
co  GRAMS/KG OF  FUEL    15.0
CO? GRAMS/KG OF  FUEL    3111
NOX GRAMS/KG UF  FUEL    1.15
su? GRAMS/KG OF  FUKL    o.no
CARBON BALANCE FUFL  ECONOMY =
                                                        HC  GRAMS/MIN     .07
                                                        CO  GRAMS/MlN     1.5
                                                        CO? GRAMS/MIN     3?1
                                                        NOX GRAMS/MIN     .*b
                                                        SO? GRAMS/MIN   0.00
                                                        lH.b9 LITRES PER  HUNDRED  KILOMETERS

-------
                                 TABLE
                                              EXHAUST EMISSIONS FROM SINGLE BAG SAMPLE
                                                    VEHICLE NUMBER EMS
D
I
                         DATE   3/  2/7R               TIME    -0 MRS.        TEST NO.  2
                         MODEL   J-175  NOVA  CHEVY      SET 7                  ENGINE 5.7 LlTREO
                         RUN DURATION    23.28  MIN.   DISTANCE DRIVEN  21.95 KILOMETRES
                         cvs BLOWER  TEST  VOL.   asu.os  ACT.  cu. METRES
                           SAMPLE
SUI.FATE DATA               ------

 KILTER NO.              H7FH-28SS
 SAMPLE VOL. CU. FT.         Ib.S1*
 SAMPLE TEMP. DEC. F            78
 SAMPLE AREA SO. IN.     80917.00
 DILUTION FACTOR                 i
 STAND. DEN. MICROG/ML       20.00
 STAND. AREA SU. IN.     170105.00
 SOt,MICROG/FILTER         15.138

SULFUR DIOXIDE DATA

 SAMPLE VOL. cu. FT.          i.oo
 SAMPLE TEMP. DEG. F            70
 AREA, BUBBLER J               0.00
 DIL. FACT., BUBBLER 1            1
 AREA, BUBBLER 2               0.0(1
 DIL. FACT., BUBBLER 2            1
 STAND. DEN. MICROG/ML        1.00
 STAND. AREA, SO. IN.          1.00
 so2, MILLIG/BUBBLER i       o.uoo
 so2, MILLIG/BUBBLER 2       o.ooo
 S02, PPffr                     0.0
                          SULFATE  AND 302 EMISSIONS

                           NET  SULFATE, MILLIGRAM/TEST
                           NET  H2SOt, MILLIGRAM/TEST
                           NET  S02, GRAM/TEST
                           NET  SULFATErMILLIGRAM/KILOMETRE
                           NET  H2S04, MILLIGRAM/KILOMETRE
                           NET  S02r GRAM/KILOMETRE
                                       58.085
                                       51.30*
                                        0.000
                                        2.bf 7
                                        2.70S
                                        0.000
                                                                            BACKGROUND
                                                                                1.00
                                                                                  70
                                                                                0.00
                                                                                   1
                                                                               - 1 .00
                                                                                1.00
                                                                               o.ono
 1.00
   70
 0.00
    1
 0.00
    1
 1.110
 1.00
o.uoo
0.000
  n.o
                          SULFUR  BALANCE
                           FUEL  WT.,  2380 GRAMS
                                     SULFUR,GRAMS
                                     PCT.  RECOVERY
                                     0.000
                                      0.00
                           SULFUR  IN  FUEL,  .0310  PCT.
                            FUEL       S02       H2SO*
                                                 2.b3
     S02 + H2SOH

         .Ollt
          2.b3

-------
                                I MiLF
                                             tXHAUSf EMISSIONS FRUM SINGLE
                                                   VtHILLK NUMBER EMq
D
M
03
                         0 A T t   V ? / 7 H
                         MOPfcL   117S NOVA CHEVY
                         HP IVFR   RP
                         WE f  HULK' 1 KMP  J 7 C
                         SPFC.  HUM. 'ill.II GUAM/KG
                            TjMt    -i
                            t-F.T
                            IEST WT.  IRI«* KG.
                            [>RY BULB TEMP  S3 C
                            HARD.  737.1 MM  HG.
                                                                            HAi;  SAMPLE
                                                 TEST NO.  3
                                                 ENGINE s.7 LITREV R
                                                 GVW    II KG
                                                 REL. HUM.  SH.M- PCT
                                                 MEASURED FUEL  n.un KG
                        ia.7b MINUTES
                       73h.b  MM.  H?0
                       73fc.b  MM  H?0
                          t3  DEG. C
                       ?3810
                           PUN DURATION
                           BLO*ltR iNl.fcl PKES3.
                           RLUWtH OIF.   PRESS.
                           BLOWER INLKT TEMP.
                           OYNU REVOLUTIONS
                           BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
                           BLOWER CU.  CM /RFV.
BAG RESULTS
 HC  SAMPLF.  MFTFR READING/SCALE
 HC  SAMPLE  PPM
     BACKGRl) METER READING/SCALE
     BACKGHD PPM
     SAMPLt  MtTER READING/SCALE
     SAMPLE  PPM
     BACKGRO METER READING/SCALE
     BACKGRD PPM
             MLTEH READING/SCALE
             PERCENT
 CO? BACKGHU METER RE AOING/SC ALE
 COa HACK6RD PERCENT
             METER READING/SCALE
             PPM
 NOX BACKGRO MFTER READING/SCALE
 NOX BACKGHO PPM
 HC  CONCENTRATION PPM
 CO  CONCENTRATION PPM
 COe CONCENTRATION PCT
 NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
 S03 COCENTRATION PPM
     MASS (GRAMS)
     MASS (GRAMS)
                            HC
                            HC
                            CO
                            CO
                            CO
                            CO
                            CO?  SAMPLE
                            COS  SAMPLE
   NOX SAMPLE
   NOX SAMPLF
                            HC
                            CO
                            C05  MASS  (GRAMS)
                            NOX  MASS  (GRAMS)
                            SO?  MASS  (GRAMS)
                                                                      an. ?/?
                                                                        ?0
     10
   Ib.b/*
     qa
     .b/*
      i
   5».f /?
   e.SH
    I. 8/2
    .117
   3q.i/e
   sq.i
     .B/?
     .8
     1?
     SI
   a.»8
   38.5
   0.0
    .81
  13. 1H
52flS.lt
   8.80
   n.oo
HC  GRAMS/KILOMETRE       .05
CO  GRAMS/KILOMETRE       ,7f
CO? GRAMS/KILOMETRE    31b
NOX GRAMS/KILOMETRE       .50
SO? GRAMS/KILOMETRE      0.00

HC  GRAMS/KG OF FUEL     .Hq
CO  GRAMS/KG OF FUEL     7. •»
CO? GRAMS/KG OF FUEL    315b
NOX GRAMS/KG OF FUEL    H.q7
SO? GRAMS/KG OF FUEL    0.00
                                                         HC  GRAMS/MIN     .Ob
                                                         CO  GRAMS/MIN     i.O
                                                         CO? GRAMS/MIN     HOB
                                                         NOX GRAMg/MIN     .bt
                                                         SO? GRAMS/MIN   0.0(1
                        CAHBON  BALANCE  FUEL  ECONOMY =   13.5b LITRES PER HUNDRED  KILOMETERS

-------
    UNIT  NO.     q
    VEHICLE  MODEL
                     TEST NO.
               CHEVY  NOVA
TABLE                   VEHICLE EMISSION RESULTS
                1975  LIGHT DUTY EMISSIONS TEST
          DATE  3/3S/7B      . ,              MFGR. CODE
          ENGINE   S.7t LITRE 8             CURB WT.
                       -0
                       0 KG
                                                                                                                CVH
                               1«I7S
                                  0  KG
a
BAROMETER 7HH.98 MM OF HG.
DRY BULB TEMP.   2-K* OEG. C
REL. HUMIDITY     it PCT.

EXHAUST EMISSIONS

     BLOWER DIF. PRESS., G2, 7b2.0 MM. H20
     RAG RESULTS
     BAG NO.
     BLOHER REVOLUTIONS
     HC   SAMPLE  METER REAOING/SCALE
     HC   SAMPLE  PPM
     HC   BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
     HC   8ACKGRO PPM
     CO   SAMPLE  METER READING/SCALE
     CO   SAMPLE  PPM
     CO   BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
     CO   BACKGRD PPM
     COB  SAMPLE  METER READING/SCALE
     C02  SAMPLE  PERCENT
     CO?  BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
     COa  BACKGRD PERCENT
     NOX  SAMPLE  METER READING/SCALE
     NOX  SAMPLE  PPM
     NOX  BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
     NOX  BACKGRD PPM
     SOa  SAMPLE  METER READING/SCALE
     SOB  SAMPLE  PPM
     302  BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
     SO?  BACKGRD PPM

     HC   CONCENTRATION PPM
     CO   CONCENTRATION PPM
     COa  CONCENTRATION PCT
     NOX  CONCENTRATION PPM
     SO?  CONCENTRATION PPM
     HC   MASS GRAMS
     CO   MASS GRAMS
     CO?  MASS GRAMS
     NOX  MASS GRAMS
     SOa  MASS GRAMS
         WEIGHTED  MASS  HC
         WEIGHTED  MASS  CO
         WEIGHTED  MASS  CO?
         WEIGHTED  MASS  NOX
         WEIGHTED  MASS  SOa
                  83.2/2..
                    83
                  n.b/a
                    12
                  bB.S/*
                   281
                   a.o/*
                     b
                  «»3.S/2
                  i.«ta
                   i.q/2
                   .07
                  <*o.8/2
                  tO. 8
                   1.2/2
                   l.a
                  -o.o/*
                  -0.0
                                                      •0.0
                                                        73
                                                      1.87
                                                      39.8
                                                       0.0
                                                      3.?1
                                                     a*. os
                                                       .18
                                                      H.58
                                                      0.00
                           (0.39)
                           ?.oa GRAMS/KILOMETRE
                              1) GRAMS/KILOMETRE
                            .»f GRAMS/KILOMETRE
                           0.00 GRAMS/KILOMETRE
                                                                           WET BULB TEMP  11.1 DEG. C
                                                                            ABS. HUMIDITY   a.7 GRAMS/KG
                                                                       23.8/2
                                                                       23.8
                                                                       10.7/2
                                                                       10.7
                                                                       91. 3/*
 bS.3/3
 1.1?
  3.7/3
  .Ob
  1.7/2
  «>.7
   .8/2
   .8
 -O.O/*
 -0.0
 -O.O/*
 -0.0

 14. I
   8b
 1.12
  S.O
  0.0
 1.054
13.01
                                   1.77
                                   0.00
                                                                           BLOWER INLET PRESS.,
                                                                           BLOWER INLET TEMP.
   3
fObOO
 30.7/2
 30.7
 11.0/2
 I 1.0
 22. S/*
   aa
  1.7/*
    a
 85.3/3
 1.S8
  3.0/3
  .05
 2*. 7/2
 2*. 7
   .b/2
   .fa
 -O.O/*
 -0.0
 -O.O/*
 -0.0

 21.0
   20
 l.S*
 2».2
  0.0
 0.920
 1.73
                  2.78
                  0.00
                                                            Gl 7b?,0 MM. H30
                                                            »3 DEG. C
         FUEL ECONOMY BY CARBON BALANCE  =    5.5   KILOMETRE/LITRE

-------
                               TABLE
                                            EXHAUST  EMISSIONS  FROM  SINGLE  BAG  SAMPLE
                                                  VEHICLE  NUMBER  EM9
O
I
NJ
O
                       DATE   3/PS/7H
                       MODEL   1175  CHEVY  NOVA
                       DRIVER    BP
                       WET BULB  TEMP   12  C
                       SPFC.  HUM.   2.9 GRAM/KG
                         TIME    -o MRS.
                         SET-7
                         TEST WT.  181* KG.
                         DRY BULB TEMP  2b C
                         BARO.  7*1.9 MM  HG,
        TEST NO.  2
        ENGINE 5.7 LlTREV 8
        GVM    0 KG
        REL. HUM.  13.8 PCT
        MEASURED FUEL  o.oo KG
                          RUN DURATION
                          BLOWER  INLET  PRESS.
                          BLOWER  OIF.   PRESS.
                          BLOWER  INLET  TEMP.
                          DYNO  REVOLUTIONS
                          BLOWER  REVOLUTIONS
                          BLOWER  cu.  CM /REV.
                     23.29 MINUTES
                    7b?.0  MM. H20
                    7b2.0  MM  H20
                       H3  DEG. C
                    311b9
                     ll?2Bb
                     ?2?8
                                       METER  READING/SCALE
                                       PPM
                               BACKGRD  METER  READING/SCALE
                               BACKGRD  PPM
                               SAMPLE   METER  READING/SCALE
                               SAMPLE   PPM
                               BACKGRD  METER  READING/SCALE
BAG RESULTS
 HC  SAMPLE
 HC  SAMPLE
 HC
 HC
 CO
 CO
 CO
 CO  BACKGRO PPM
 C02 SAMPLE  METER READING/SCALE
 CO? SAMPLE  PERCENT
 C02 BACKGRO MEIER READING/SCALE
 C02 BACKGRO PERCENT
 NOX SAMPLE  METER READING/SCALE
 NOX SAMPLE  PPM
 NOX BACKGHD METER READING/SCALE
 NOX BACKGRO PPM
     CONCENTRATION PPM
     CONCENTRATION PPM
 CO? CONCENTRATION PCT
 NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
 S02 COCENTRATION PPM
     MASS (GRAMS)
     MASS (GRAMS)
                          HC
                          CO
                          HC
                          CO
                          CO? MASS  (GRAMS)
                          NOX MASS  (GRAMS)
                          302 MASS  (GRAMS)

                       HC  GRAMS/KILOMETRE       .08
                       CO  GRAMS/KILOMETRE       .53
                       C02 GRAMS/KILOMETRE   312
                       NOX GRAMS/KILOMETRE       .52
                       SO? GRAMS/KILOMETRE     0.00

                       HC  GRAMS/KG OF FUEL    .85
                       CO  GRAMS/KG OF FUEL    5.3
                       CO? GRAMS/KG OF FUEL   3158
                       NOX GRAMS/KG UF FUEL   5.27
                       S02 GRAMS/KG OF FUEL   o.oo
   22. H/?
     2?
    B.H/2
      8
   51. b/*
     *9
     .!/*
      0
   1.82
    1.8/2
    .07
   34..1/2
   3b.l
     .5/2
     .5
     15
     f 7
   1.77
   35.7
   0.0
   1.8?
  11. f 7
b782.82
  11.31
   0.00
                              HC  GRAMS/MIN    .08
                              CO  GRAMS/MIN     .5
                              CO? GRAMS/MIN    ?
-------
                                TABLE
V
to
                                             EXHAUST EMISSIONS FROM SINGLE BAG SAMPLE
                                                   VEHICLE NUMBER EMq
                         DATE   3/59/78              TIME    -0 HRS.        TEST NO.  2
                         MODEL   1975 CHEVY NOVA     SET-7                  ENGINE 5.7 LITREO
                         RUN DURATION   53.51 MIN.  DISTANCE DRIVEN  21.7H KILOMETRES
                         CVS BLOWER TEST VOL.  250.lt ACT. CU. METRES
                                                    SAMPLE
                         SULFATE DATA

                          FILTER NO.               17FH-2899
                          SAMPLE VOL. CU.  FT.        lb.30
                          SAMPLE TEMP.  DEC.  F           80
                          SAMPLE AREA SO.  IN.     125b2.00
                          DILUTION FACTOR                 1
                          STAND. OEN. MICROG/ML       5.00
                          STAND. AREA SO.  IN.    137tb7.00
                          SOt,MICROG/FlLTER
i.oo
  70
0.00
   1
0.00
   1
1.00
1.00
SULFUR DIOXIDE DATA

 SAMPLE VOL. cu. FT.
 SAMPLE TEMP. DEG. F
 AREA, BUBBLER 1
 OIL. FACT., BUBBLER 1
 AREA, BUBBLER 2
 OIL. FACT., BUBBLER a
 STAND. OEN. MICROG/ML
 STAND. AREA, SO. IN.
 SOS, MILLIG/BUBBLER 1      0.000
 S02, MILLIG/BUBBLER 2      0.000
 305, PPM                     0.0

SULFATE AND S02 EMISSIONS

 NET SULFATE, MILLIGRAM/TEST
 NET H2SOH, MILLIGRAM/TEST
 NET 302, GRAM/TEST
 NET SULFATE, MILLIGRAM/KILOMETRE
 NET Hssot, MILLIGRAM/KILOMETRE
 NET S02, GRAM/KILOMETRE
                         SULFUR BALANCE
                          FUEL WT., 51HB GRAMS
                                    SULFUR,GRAMS
                                    PCT. RECOVERY
                                                                ?.833
                                                                2.891
                                                                o.oon
                                                                 .130
                                                                 .133
                                                                0.000
                                                  BACKGROUND
                                                      1.00
                                                        70
                                                      0.00
                                                         1
                                                      1.00
                                                      1.00
                                                     0.000
 1.00
   70
 0.00
    1
 0.00
    1
 1.00
 1.00
0.000
0.000
  0.0
                          SULFUR IN FUEL, .0310 PCT.
                           FUEL      S05       H2SOt
                                                     .b?
                                    0.000
                                     0.00
                                                                        .0001
                             302 + H2SOH

                                 .0009
                                   .11

-------
        TABLE
                     EXHAUST  EMISSIONS  FROM  SINGLE  BAG  SAMPLE
                           VEHICLE  NUMBER  EMI
DATE   3/81/7B
MODEL   1975  CHEVY  NOVA
DRIVER    BP
WET BULB  UMP   17  C
SPEC.  HUM.   8.7 GRAM/KG
                            TIME     -0  HRS.
                            FET
                            TEST  WT.   181H  KG.
                            DRY BULB  TEMP   2b  C
                            8ARO.   7*1.1 MM   HG.
                                           TEST NO.  3
                                           ENGINE 5.7 LITREV 8
                                           GVM    0 KG
                                           REL. HUM.  *0.b PCT
                                           MEASURED FUEL  0.00 KG
  RUN DURATION
  BLOWER  INLET PRESS.
  BLOWER  DIF.  PRESS.
  BLOWER  INLET TEMP.
  DYNO REVOLUTIONS
  BLOHER  REVOLUTIONS
  BLOWER  CU. CM  /REV.
                        12.75  MINUTES
                       7b2.0   MM.  H20
                       7b2.0   MM   H20
                          f3   DEG.  C
                       23Sf 1
                        2228
  BAG
   HC
   HC
   HC
   HC
   CO
   CO
   CO
   CO
   C02
   C02
   CO?
   cos
   NOX
   NOX
   NOX
   NOX
   HC
   CO
   C02
   NOX
   302
   HC
   CO
   C02
   NOX
   S02
      RESULTS
       SAMPLE
       SAMPLE
        METER READING/SCALE
        PPM
BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
BACKGRD PPM
SAMPLE
SAMPLE
               METER READING/SCALE
               PPM
       BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
       BACKGRD PPM
       SAMPLE  METER READING/SCALE
       SAMPLE  PERCENT
       HACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
       BACKGRD PERCENT
       SAMPLE  METER READING/SCALE
       SAMPLE  PPM
       BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
       BACKGRD PPM
       CONCENTRATION PPM
       CONCENTRATION PPM
       CONCENTRATION PCT
       CONCENTRATION PPM
       COCENTRATION PPM
       MASS (GRAMS)
       MASS (GRAMS)
       MASS (GRAMS)
       MASS (GRAMS)
       MASS (GRAMS)
HC  GRAMS/KILOMETRE     0.06 
-------
                                    TABLE
     UNIT NO.     S
     VEHICLE MODEL
      TEST NO. 1
CHEVY NOVA
              VEHICLE EMISSION RESULTS
      1175  LIGHT DUTY EMISSIONS TEST
DATE  3/31/78                     MFGR. CODE
ENGINE   5.71 LITRE 8             CURB WT.
        -0
        0 KG
YR.
GVM
1175
   0 KG
     BAROMETER 711.18 MM OF HG.
     DRY BULB TEMP.   21.7 DEC. C
     REL. HUMIDITY     bO PCT.

     EXHAUST EMISSIONS
D
BLOWER DIF. PRESS.,
BAG
BAG
RESULTS
NO.
G2, 73b.b MM


RLOWER REVOLUTIONS
HC
HC
HC
HC
CO
CO
CO
CO
C02
CO?
CO?
COS
NOX
NOX
NOX
NOX
sog
502
S02
502
HC
CO
coe
NOX
S02
HC
CO
C02
NOX
802
SAMPLE MFTER
SAMPLE PPM
UACKGRD METER
BACKGRD PPM
SAMPLE METER
SAMPLE PPM
BACKGRD METER
BACKGRD PPM
SAMPLE METER
READING/SCALE

READING/SCALE

READING/SCALE

READING/SCALE

READING/SCALE
SAMPLE PERCENT
BACKGRD METER
READING/SCALE
BACKGRD PERCENT
SAMPLE METER
SAMPLE PPM
BACKGRD METER
BACKGRD PPM
SAMPLE METER
SAMPLE PPM
BACKGRD METER
BACKGRD PPM
CONCENTRATION
CONCENTRATION
CONCENTRATION
CONCENTRATION
CONCENTRATION
MASS GRAMS
MASS GRAMS
MASS GRAMS
MASS GRAMS
MASS GRAMS
READING/SCALE

READING/SCALE

READING/SCALE

READING/SCALE

PPM
PPM
PCT
PPM
PPM





                                            H20
                                    1
                                 lObIS
                                  
-------
                               TABLE
                                            EXHAUST EMISSIONS FROM SINGLE BAG SAMPLE
                                                  VEHICLE NUMBER EM9
D
NO
                        DATE  3/31/7B
                        MODEL  1975 CHEVY NOVA
                        DRIVER   SM
                        WET BULB TEMP  IB C
                        SPEC. HUM.   9.9 GRAM/KG
                         TIME    -U HRS.
                         SET-7
                         TEST WT.  181* KG.
                         DRY BULB TEMP  25 C
                         BARO.  7HS.O MM  HG.
                                               TEST NO.  a
                                               ENGINE 5.7 LITREV s
                                               GVH    0 KG
                                               REL. HUM.  H9.0 PCT
                                               MEASURED FUEL  0.00 KG
                          RUN DURATION
                          BLOWER INLET PRESS.
                          BLOWER DIF.  PRESS.
                          BLOWER INLET TEMP.
                          DYNO REVOLUTIONS
                          BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
                          BLOWER CU. CM /REV.
                     23.29 MINUTES
                    73b.b  MM. H20
                           MM  H20
                    73fa.b
                       H3
                    37379
                     112*22
                     2229
                          DEG. C
                                       METER READING/SCALE
                                       PPM
                               BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
                               BACKGRD PPM
                               SAMPLE  METER READING/SCALE
                               SAMPLE  PPM
                               BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
BAG RESULTS
 HC  SAMPLE
 HC  SAMPLE
 HC
 HC
 CO
 CO
 CO
 CO  BACKGRD PPM
 C02 SAMPLE  METER READING/SCALE
 C02 SAMPLE  PERCENT
 C02 BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
 C02 BACKGRD PERCENT
             METER READING/SCALE
             PPM
 NOX HACKGRO METER READING/SCALE
 NOX BACKGRD PPM
 HC  CONCENTRATION PPM
 CO  CONCENTRATION PPM
 C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
 NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
 S02 COCENTRATION PPM
     MASS (GRAMS)
     MASS (GRAMS)
NOX SAMPLE
NOX SAMPLE
                           HC
                           CO
                           C02 MASS (GRAMS)
                           NOX MASS (GRAMS)
                           S02 MASS (GRAMS)

                        HC  GRAMS/KILOMETRE      .09
                        CO  GRAMS/KILOMETRE      .35
                        C02 GRAMS/KILOMETRE   321
                        NOX GRAMS/KILOMETRE      .bS
                        302 GRAMS/KILOMETRE     0.00

                        HC  GRAMS/KG OF FUEL    .85
                        CO  GRAMS/KG OF FUEL    3.5
                        C02 GRAMS/KG OF FUEL   31bl
                        NOX GRAMS/KG OF FUEL   b.»2
                        S02 GRAMS/KG OF FUEL   0.00
                                          30.0/2
                                            30
                                          lb.9/2
                                            17
                                          39. 2/*
                                            37
   1.87
    2.2/2
    .08
   37.0/2
   37.0
    1.1/2
    1.1
     15
     31
   1.80
   3b.l
   0.0
   1.88
   7.b9
b970.39
  If. 15
   0.00
                              HC  GRAMS/MIN    .08
                              CO  GRAMS/MIN     .3
                              C02 GRAMS/MIN    299
                              NOX GRAMS/MIN    .bl
                              S02 GRAMS/MIN   0.00
                        CARBON BALANCE FUEL ECONOMY =   13.7t LITRES PER HUNDRED KILOMETERS

-------
       TABLE
                    EXHAUST EMISSIONS FROM SINGLE BAG SAMPLE
                          VEHICLE NUMBER EMI
o
to
DATE  3/31/78              TIME    -0 HRS.        TEST NO.   2
MODEL  1^75 CHEVY NOVA     SET-7                  ENGINE 5.7 LlTREO
RUN DURATION   23.21 MIN.  DISTANCE DRIVEN  21.7f KILOMETRES
CVS BLOWFR TEST VOL.  250.53 ACT. CU. METRES
                           SAMPLE
SULFATE DATA               	

 FILTER NO.              t?FH-2102
 SAMPLE VOL. CU. FT.        15.71
 SAMPLE TEMP. DEC. F           80
 SAMPLE AREA SQ. IN.     bb-H7.00
 DILUTION FACTOR                1
 STAND. DEN. MICROG/ML       s.oo
 STAND. AREA SQ. IN.    I"»b011.00
 SOH,MICROG/FILTER         22.753

SULFUR DIOXIDE DATA

 SAMPLE VOL. cu. FT.         i.oo
 SAMPLE TEMP. DEG. F           70
 AREA,BUBBLER 1              0.00
 OIL. FACT.,BUBBLER 1           1
 AREA,BUBBLER 2              0.00
 OIL. FACT.,BUBBLER 2           1
 STAND. DEN. MICROG/ML       1.00
 STAND. AREA,SO. IN.         1.00
 so2, MILLIG/BUBBLER i      o.ooo
 S02, MILLIG/BUBBLER 2      0.000
 S02, PPM                     0.0

SULFATE AND 302 EMISSIONS

 NET  SULFATE,MILLIGRAM/TEST
 NET  H2SOH,MILLIGRAM/TEST
 NET  302,GRAM/TEST
 NET  SULFATE,MILLIGRAM/KILOMETRE
 NET  H2SO'»,MILLIGRAM/KILOMETRE
 NET  302,GRAM/KILOMETRE
                                      1H.512
                                      IH.Slfa
                                       o.ooo
                                         .bbB
                                         ,b82
                                       o.ooo
                                                  BACKGROUND
                                                       1.00
                                                         70
                                                       0.00
                                                         1
                                                       1.00
                                                       1.00
                                                     0.000
                                                       i.oo
                                                         70
                                                       o.oo
                                                         i
                                                       0.00
                                                         1
                                                       1.00
                                                       1.00
                                                     0.000
                                                     0.000
                                                       0.0
SULFUR BALANCE
 FUEL WT., 2205 GRAMS
           SULFUR,GRAMS
           PCT. RECOVERY
                                                 SULFUR  IN  FUEL,  .0310  PCT.
                                                  FUEL       302       H2S01
                                                   .b8
                                    o.oon
                                     o.oo
                                                          302 +
.OOH8
  .71
                                                                                     ,00f8
                                                                                       .71

-------
                              TABLE
                                           EXHAUST  EMISSIONS  FROM  SINGLE  BAG  SAMPLE
                                                 VEHICLE NUMBER EMS
to
en
                      DATE   3/31/7B
                      MODEL   1977 CHEVY NOVA
                      DRIVER    SH
                      WET BULB  ItMH   IB C
                      SPEC.  HUM.  .10.8 GRAM/KG
                         TIME    -0 HR3.
                         FET
                         TEST WT.  181H KG.
                         DRY BULB TEMP  ?H C
                         BARO.  7HS.O MM  HG.
        TEST NO.  3
        ENGINE 5.7 LITREV B
        GVW    0 KG
        REL. HUM.  55.H PCT
        MEASURED FUEL  0.00 KG
                        RUN DURATION
                        BLOWER  INLET PRESS.
                        BLOWER  DIP.  PRESS.
                        BLOWER  INLET TEMP.
                        DYNO REVOLUTIONS    23RH7
                        BLOWER  REVOLUTIONS     b!513
                        BLOWER  CU. CM  /REV.
                     18.7b MINUTES
                    73b.b  MM. H?0
                    73b.b  MM  H20
                       *3  DEC. C
BAG RESULTS
 HC  SAMPLE  METER READING/SCALE
 HC  SAMPLE  PPM
 HC  HACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
 HC  BACKGRD PPM
 CO  SAMPLE  METER READING/SCALE
 CO  SAMPLE  PPM
 CO  HACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
 CO  BACKGRO PPM
 CO? SAMPLE  METER READING/SCALE
 COS SAMPLE  PERCENT
 CO? BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
 COS 8ACKGKD PERCENT
 NOX SAMPLE  METER READING/SCALE
 NOX SAMPLE  PPM
 NOX BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
 NOX BACKGRD PPM
 HC  CONCENTRATION PPM
 CO  CONCENTRATION PPM
 COS CONCENTRATION PCT
 NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
 SO? COCENTRATION PPM
 HC  MASS (GRAMS)
 CO  MASS (GRAMS)
 CO? MASS (GRAMS)
 NOX MASS (GRAMS)
 SO? MASS (GRAMS)
                      HC  GRAMS/KILOMETRE      .07
                      co  GRAMS/KILOMETRE      .«»i
                      CO? GRAMS/KILOMETRE   287
                      NOX GRAMS/KILOMETRE      .7b
                      SO? GRAMS/KILOMETRE     0.00

                      HC  GRAMS/KG OF FUEL    .8?
                      co  GRAMS/KG OF FUEL    ».s
                      co? GRAMS/KG OF FUEL   sibo
                      NOX GRAMS/KG OF FUEL   8.33
                      SO? GRAMS/KG OF FUEL   0.00
   31.1/2
     31
   15.2/2
     15
   b7.b/*
     bb
   If.*/*
     It
   50.?/2
   2.29
    2.1/2
    .08
   57.8/2
   57.8
    1.7/2
    1.7
     19
     50
   2.23
   Sb.f
   0.0
   1.23
   b.78
f733.97
  12.HB
   0.00
                              HC  GRAMS/MIN    .10
                              CO  GRAMS/MIN     .5
                              co? GRAMS/MIN    371
                              NOX GRAMS/MIN    .98
                              SO? GRAMS/MIN   0.00
                      CARBON BALANCE FUEL ECONOMY =   12.3? LITRES PER HUNDRED KILOMETERS

-------
 UNIT NO.  EMS
 VEHICLE MODEL
                        TEST  NO.
                   CHEVROLET  NOVA
             TABLE                  VEHICLE EMISSION RESULTS
                                 1178  LIGHT DOTY EMISSIONS TEST
                           ACTUAL DISTANCES USED IN CALCULATIONS
               1       DATE  1/2S/7B                     MFGR. CODE
                       ENGINE   5.71 LITRE 8             CURB WT.
-0
0 KG
YR.
GVM
117b
   0 KG
 BAROMETER 711.73 MM OF HG.
 DRY BULB TEMP.   21.7 DEC. C
 REL. HUMIDITY     15 PCT.
 EXHAUST EMISSIONS

      BLOWER DIF. PRESS.,
      BAG RESULTS
      BAG NO.
      BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
      HC
      HC
      HC
      HC
      CO
      CO
      CO
      CO
      C02
      COS
D
to
                              G2,  73b.b  MM.  H20
               SAMPLE   METER  READING/SCALE
               SAMPLE   PPM
               BACKGRD  METER  READING/SCALE
               BACKGRD  PPM
               SAMPLE   METER  READING/SCALE
               SAMPLE   PPM
               BACKGRD  METER  READING/SCALE
               BACKGRD  PPM
               SAMPLE
               SAMPLE
METER READING/SCALE
PERCENT
      C02  BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
      C02  BACKGRD PERCENT
      NOX  SAMPLE  METER READING/SCALE
      NOX  SAMPLE  PPM
      NOX  BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
      NOX  BACKGRD PPM
      S02  SAMPLE  METER READING/SCALE
      S02  SAMPLE  PPM
      302  BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
      S02  BACKGRD PPM

      HC   CONCENTRATION PPM
      CO   CONCENTRATION PPM
      C02  CONCENTRATION PCT
      NOX  CONCENTRATION PPM
      S02  CONCENTRATION PPM
      HC   MASS GRAMS
      CO   MASS GRAMS
      C02  MASS GRAMS
      NOX  MASS GRAMS
      S02  MASS GRAMS
      HC GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
      CO GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
      C02 GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
      NOX GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
      FUEL CONSUMPTION BY C8  L/1011KM (MPG)
      CVS FLOW STD. CU. METRES (SCF)
      CALCULATED DISTANCE KM(MILES)
WEIGHTED FUEL
WEIGHTED MASS
WEIGHTED MASS
WEIGHTED MASS
WEIGHTED MASS
    TOTAL CVS
                  CONSUMPTION  LITRES/100KM  (MPG)
                  HC  GRAMS/KM  (GRAMS/MILE)
                  CO  GRAMS/KM  (GRAMS/MILE)
                  C02  GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
                  NOX  GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
                  FLOW  =    282.7  STD. CU. METRES
                                                                           WET  BULB  TEMP   11.1  DEG.  C
                                                                            ABS.  HUMIDITY    7.1 GRAMS/KG
                                                                            COMMENTS   1178 FTPC
                                                    BLOWER INLET PRESS., Gl 73b.b MM. H20
                                                    BLOWER INLET TEMP.   13 DEG. C
1
10708
11. 7/ 2
IS
1.2/ 2
1
81.8/11
371
.b/11
2
Ib.b/ 3
1.82
3.0/ 3
.05
11. 1/ 2
11.1
.I/ 2
.1
-0.0/-0
-0.0
-0.0/-0
-0.0
87
351
1.78
11.1
0.0
3.82
31.12
2181.1?
5.80
0.00
.b7 ( 1.
5.5b ( 8.
132. b5 (bib.
1.01 ( 1.
18.13 ( 12.
7b.1 (2b1b
5.71 ( 3.
17.83
.3b
1.75
<»01.08
.bO
2
bl^SS
31. 2/ 2
31
8.8X 2
1
51.5/11
237
.1/11
0
b3.3/ 3
1.13
3. 1/ 3
.05
10. 8/ 2
10.8
.7/ 2
.7
-0.0/-0
-0.0
-0.0/-0
-0.0
23
221
1.01
10.2
0.0
1.7H
3t.b8
2510.02
2.28
0.00
07) .28 ( ,tb)
11) S.bf ( 1.07)
11) 121.03 (b77.11)
b3) .37 ( .bO)
13) 18.31 ( 12.71)
.5) 130.3 (1b02.0)
57) b.15 ( 3.82)
( 13.20)
( .58)
( 7.b1)
(b58.21)
( .17)
3
10513
15. 0/ 2
15
8.3/ 2
8
73.8/12
Ib8
.1/12
1
81. b/ 3
1.57
3.0/ 3
.05
32. b/ 2
32. b
.B/ 2
.8
-0.0/-0
-0.0
-0.0/-0
-0.0
38
IfaO
1.52
31.1
0.0
l.bS
11. Ib
2123.02
1.18
0.00
.21 (
2.1b ( 3.
3b8.88 (513.
.73 ( 1.
15.15 ( 11.
7b.O (2b85
5.7b ( 3.





































*b)
Ib)
53)
17)
75)
.2)
58)






-------
                        TABLE
                                     EXHAUST EMISSIONS FROM SINGLE BAG SAMPLE
                                           VEHICLE NUMBER EMS
D
M
03
                 DATE  H/25/78              TIME    -0 MRS.
                 MODEL  1175 CHEVROLET NOVA SET-7
                 DRIVER   JC                TEST WT.  181H KG.
                 WET BULB TEMP  1H C        DRY BULB TEMP  25 C
                 SPEC. HUM.   5.9 GRAM/KG   BARO.  7*5.0 MM  HG.
                 DISTANCE  21.BUB KM

                   RUN DURATION
                   BLOWER INLET PRESS.
                   BLOWER DIP.  PRESS.
                   BLOWER INLET TEMP.
                   DYNO REVOLUTIONS
                   BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
                   BLOWER CU. CM /REV.
                                                TEST NO.  2
                                                ENGINE 5.7 LITRE  8
                                                GVW    0 KG
                                                REL. HUM.  aq.7 PCT
                                                MEASURED FUEL  O.OU KG
                           FUEL 738.2 G/LITRE   FUEL HC  RATIO 1.8bO
                     23.30 MINUTES
                      7b2.0  MM. H20
                      7b2.0  MM  H20
                       »3  DEC. C
                    31b89
                     112237
                     2228
                                METER READING/SCALE
                                PPM
                        BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
                        BACKGRD PPM
                        SAMPLE  METER READING/SCALE
                        SAMPLE  PPM
                        BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
BAG RESULTS
 HC  SAMPLE
 HC  SAMPLE
 HC
 HC
 CO
 CO
 CO
 CO  BACKGRD PPM
 C02 SAMPLE  METER READING/SCALE
 C02 SAMPLE  PERCENT
 C02 BACKGHD METER READING/SCALE
 C08 BACKGRD PERCENT
             METER READING/SCALE
             PPM
 NOX BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
 NOX BACKGRD PPM
 HC  CONCENTRATION PPM
 CO  CONCENTRATION PPM
 C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
 NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
 302 COCENTRATION PPM
     MASS (GRAMS)
     MASS (GRAMS)
                    NOX SAMPLE
                    NOX SAMPLE
                    HC
                    CO
                    C02 MASS (GRAMS)
                    NOX MASS (GRAMS)
                    302 MASS (GRAMS)
     29. 5/ 2
       29
     10. S/ 2
       10
     H9.1/12
      1IJ8
       .2/12
        0
     93. 2/ 3
     1.75
      3. I/ 3
      .05
     »2.7/ 2
     »2.7
       .?/ 2
       .7
       20
      103
     1.70
     H2.1
     0.0
    25.17
  bSHO.tl
    1H.S8
     0.00
                 HC   GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
                 CO   GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
                 coa  GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
                 NOX  GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
                 S02  GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)

                 HC   GRAMS/KG OF  FUEL   1.19
                 CO   GRAMS/KG OF  FUEL   12.1
                 C02  GRAMS/KG OF  FUEL   31H7
                 NOX  GRAMS/KG OF  FUEL   7.02
                 302  GRAMS/KG OF  FUEL   0.00
                               .11  (
                              1.15  (
                               300  (
                               .b7  (
                              0.00  (
 .18)
l.Bb)
1.08)
0.00)
                              HC   GRAMS/MIN    .11
                              CO   GRAMS/MIN    1.1
                              C02  GRAMS/MIN    281
                              NOX  GRAMS/MIN    .b3
                              302  GRAMS/MIN   0.00
                 CARBON BALANCE FUEL ECONOMY L/100KM (MILES/GALLON)
                 TOTAL CVS FLOW =   SO9.7STO. CU.  METRES
              ERROR  lO17(l
-------
                              TABLE
                                           EXHAUST EMISSIONS FROM  SINGLE  BAR  SAMPLE
                                                 VEHICLE NUMBER EMS
a
N)
                       DATE  H/25/7H              1IME    -0 HR3.         TEST  NO.   2
                       MODEL  1175 CHEVROLET NOVA SET-7                   ENGINE  5.7 LITREO
                       HUN DURATION   53.au MIN.  DISTANCE DRIVEN   21.77  KILOMETRES
                       CVS BLOWER TEST VOL.  ?50.05 ACT. CU. METRES
                                                  SAMPLE
                                                   FH-2S22
                                                   17. bS
                                                       81
SULFATE DATA

 FILTER NO.
 SAMPLE VOL. CU. FT.
 SAMPLE TEMP. DEG. F
 SAMPLE AREA so. IN.
 DILUTION FACTOR                 1
 STAND. DEN. MICROG/ML       5.Oil
 STAND. AREA SO. IN.    155115.00
 SC)t,MICROG/FILTER         17.512

SULFUR DIOXIDE DATA

 SAMPLE VOL. cu. FT.         i.oo
 SAMPLE TEMP. DEG. F           ?o
 AREA,BUBBLER 1              0.00
 OIL. FACT.,BUBBLER 1            1
 AREA,BUBBLER S              0.00
 OIL. FACT.,BUBBLER 2            i
 STAND. DEN. MICROG/ML       1.00
 STAND. AREA,SO. IN.         1.00
 S02, MILLIG/BUbBLER 1      0.000
 S02, MILLIG/BUBBLER 2      0.0110
 S02, PPM                      0.0

SULFATE AND S02 EMISSIONS

 NET  SULFATE,MILLIGRAM/TEST
 NET  H2SOH,MILLIGRAM/TEST
 NET  S02,GRAM/TEST
 NET  SULFATE,MILLIGRAM/KILOMETRE
 NET  H2sot,MILLIGRAM/KILOMETRE
 NET  S02,GRAM/KILOMETRE
                        SULFUR  BALANCE
                         FUEL WT.,  2087  GRAMS
                                   SULFUPrGRAMS
                                   PCI.  RECOVERY
                                                              10.015
                                                              10.22b
                                                               0.000
                                                                .fbO
                                                                .H70
                                                               0.000
                        BACKGROUND
                            1.00
                              70
                            0.00
                               1
                            1 .00
                            1.00
                           0.000
                            1.00
                              70
                            0.00
                               1
                            0.00
                               1
                            1.00
                            1.00
                           0.000
                           0.000
                             0.0
SULFUR IN FUEL,  .0310 PCT.
 FUEL      502       H2SOt
  .b5
          U.OOO
           0.00
                                                .0033
                                                  .52
S02 + H2SOt

    .0033
      .52

-------
                           TABLE
                  EXHAUST EMISSIONS FROM SINGLE BAG SAMPLE
                        VEHICLE NUMBER EM9
O
ui
O
                    DATE   H/25/78               TIME     -0  MRS.
                    MODEL   1175  CHEVROLET  NOVA  FET   EM-9
                    DRIVER    JC                 TEST  WT.  181H KG.
                    WET BULB  TEMP   ib  C         DRY BULB TEMP  27  C
                    SPEC.  HUM.   b.2 GRAM/KG    BARO.   7H5.0 MM  HG.
                                                TEST NO.  3
                                                ENGINE 5.7 LITRE  8
                                                GVM    0 KG
                                                REL. HUM.  27.» PCT
                                                MEASURED FUEL  0.00 KG
                    DISTANCE   Ib.b21  KM

                      RUN  DURATION
                      BLOWER  INLET  PRESS.
                      BLOWER  DIF.   PRESS.
                      BLOWER  INLET  TEMP.
                      DYNO REVOLUTIONS
                      BLOWER  REVOLUTIONS
                      BLOWER  CU.  CM /REV.
                           FUEL 738.3 G/LITRE   FUEL HC  RATIO 1.8bO
                     12.7b MINUTES
                      7b9.b  MM. H20
                      7b9.b  MM  H20
                       •»H  DEC. C
                    2*155
                      bl575
                     2229
BAG RESULTS
 HC  SAMPLE  METER READING/SCALE
 HC  SAMPLE  PPM
 HC  BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
 HC  BACKGRD PPM
 CO  SAMPLE  METER READING/SCALE
 CO  SAMPLE  PPM
 CO  BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
 CO  BACKGRD PPM
 C02 SAMPLE  METER READING/SCALE
 C02 SAMPLE  PERCENT
 C02 BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
 C02 BACKGRD PERCENT
 NOX SAMPLE  METER READING/SCALE
 NOX SAMPLE  PPM
 NOX BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
 NOX BACKGRD PPM
 HC  CONCENTRATION PPM
 CO  CONCENTRATION PPM
 COS CONCENTRATION PCT
 NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
 302 COCENTRATION PPM
 HC  MASS (GRAMS)
 CO  MASS (GRAMS)
 C02 MASS (GRAMS)
 NOX MASS (GRAMS)
 302 MASS (GRAMS)
     30.H/ 2
       30
     12.7/ 2
       13
     lb.1/13
       15
      1.3/13
        1
     H7.b/ 2
     2.15
      1.5/ 2
      .05
     58.5/ 2
     58. 5
       .B/ 2
       .8
       20
       If
     2.10
     57.8
     0.0
     1.31
     1.81
  fH7.71
    11.Ob
     0.00
                   HC  GRAMS/KM  (GRAMS/MILE)
                   CO  GRAMS/KM  (GRAMS/MILE)
                   C02 GRAMS/KM  (GRAMS/MILE)
                   NOX GRAMS/KM  (GRAMS/MILE)
                   S02 GRAMS/KM  (GRAMS/MILE)

                   HC  GRAMS/KG  OF  FUEL     ,1H
                   CO  GRAMS/KG  OF  FUEL     1.3
                   C02 GRAMS/KG  OF  FUEL    31bH
                   NOX GRAMS/KG  OF  FUEL    7.13
                   302 GRAMS/KG  OF  FUEL    0.00
                               .08 (
                               .11 (
                               2bb (
                               .b? (
                              0.00 (
 .13)
 .18)
 »2B)
1.07)
o.no)
                              HC  GRAMS/MIN
                              CO  GRAMS/MIN
                              C02 GRAMS/MIN
                              NOX GRAMS/MIN
                              S02 GRAMS/MIN
         .10
          .1
         3Hb
         .87
        0.00
                   CARBON  BALANCE  FUEL  ECONOMY  L/100KM  (MILES/GALLON)

                   TOTAL CVS  FLOW=   11H.B3TD.  CU.  METRES
                                                      11.3b ( 20.70)

-------
                                TABLE
 UNIT NO.  EMI
 VEHICLE MODEL
                   TEST NO.
               CHEVROLET NOVA
             VEHICLE EMISSION RESULTS
          1178  LIGHT DUTY EMISSIONS TEST
    ACTUAL DISTANCES USED IN CALCULATIONS
DATE  t/8b/78                     MFGR.  CODE
ENGINE   5.7* LITRE B             CURB WT.
-0
0 KG
YR.
GVM
117b
   U KG
                                        H80
BAROMETER 7-*t.SB MM OF HG.
DRY BULB TEMP.   81.1 DEC. .C
REL. HUMIDITY     37 PCT.

EXHAUST EMISSIONS

     BLOWER OIF. PRESS., 68, 7b8.0 MM.
     BAG RESULTS
     RAG NO.
     RLOWER REVOLUTIONS
     HC   SAMPLE  METER READING/SCALE
     HC   SAMPLE  PPM
     HC   BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
     HC   BACKGRO PPM
     CO   SAMPLE  METER READING/SCALE
     CO   SAMPLE  PPM
     CO   BACKGRO METER READING/SCALE
     CO   BACKGRO PPM
     C08  SAMPLE  METER READING/SCALE
     CO?  SAMPLE  PERCENT
     COS  BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
     C08  BACKGRD PERCENT
     NOX  SAMPLE  METER READING/SCALE
     NOX  SAMPLE  PPM
     NOX  BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
     NOX  BACKGRD PPM
     SOS  SAMPLE  METER READING/SCALE
     302  SAMPLE  PPM
     508  BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
     S08  BACKGRD PPM
      HC   CONCENTRATION PPM
      CO   CONCENTRATION PPM
      C08  CONCENTRATION PCT
      NOX  CONCENTRATION PPM
      S08  CONCENTRATION PPM
      HC   MASS GRAMS
      CO   MASS GRAMS
      C08  MASS GRAMS
      NOX  MASS GRAMS
      808  MASS GRAMS
      HC GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
      CO GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
      COS GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
      NOX GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
      FUEL CONSUMPTION BY CB  L/100KM (MPG)
      CVS FLOW 3TD. CU. METRES CSCF)
      CALCULATED DISTANCE KM(MILES)
                                                                       WET BULB TEMP  18.8 DEG. C
                                                                        ABS. HUMIDITY   5.8 GRAMS/KG
                                                                        COMMENTS  1178 FTPC
                             BLOWER INLET PRESS.,  Gl 7b8.0 MM.  H80
                             BLOWER INLET TEMP.    H3 DEG.  C
1
HObSb
IH.b/ 8
15
10. S/ 8
10
11.1/18
820
8.7/18
Ib
lb.1/ 3
1.88
3.b/ 3
.Ob
H1.H/ 8
H1.H
.I/ 8
.1
-o.n/-o
-0.0
-0.0/-0
-0.0
Bb
lib
1.78
HB.b
0.0
3.75
17.31
8Hb8.B7
b.08
0.00
,b5 ( l.QH)
8. IS ( H.B1)
H8b.78 (bBb.bl)
1.05 ( l.bl)
18.50 ( 18.71)
75. S (SbBl.b)
5.78 ( 3.bO)
8
b1b32
8H.i/ 8
85
10. S/ 8
10
80.5/13
80
15.1/13
15
b3.0/ 3
1.18
3.7/ 3
.Ob
18. 7/ 8
18.7
.7/ Z
.7
-0.0/-0
-0.0
-0.0/-0
-0.0
15
5
1.07
18.1
0.0
1.15
.77
8SH1.b8
2.58
0.00
.11 ( .30)
.13 ( .80)
H13.b3 (bbS.53)
.H8 ( .b7)
17. bl ( 13.30)
130.0 (HS18.0)
b.lb ( 3.83)
3
t0587
HO. I/ 8
HI
10. 7/ 8
11
88.8/13
88
11.1/13
11
83. S/ 3
1.5t
3.b/ 3
.Ob
38. 7/ 8
38.7
.?/ 8
.7
-0.0/-0
-0.0
-0.0/-0
-0.0
31
11
1 ,*1
38.1
0.0
1.37
1.01
8078.15
t.Ol
0.00
.8-» (
.17 (
351.80 (577.
.bl ( 1.
15.37 ( IS.
75.8 (8b7b
5.77 ( 3.
































38)

IS)
12)
30)
.8)
51)
WEIGHTED FUEL
WEIGHTED MASS
WEIGHTED MASS
WEIGHTED MASS
WEIGHTED MASS
    TOTAL CVS
             CONSUMPTION LITRES/100KM (MpG)
             HC GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
             CO GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
             C08 GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
             NOX GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
             FLOW =   881.8 STD. CU. METRES
             17.88 (  13.bb)
               .30 (    .HB)
               .7* (   1.18)
            "HU.37 (HHS.BO)
               .b3 (   1.01)

-------
                                TABLE
                                            EXHAUST  EMISSIONS  FROM  SINGLE  BAG  SAMPLE
                                                   VEHICLE NUMBER  EM9
D
U)
ro
                        DATE   H/2b/7B               TIME     -0  HRS.
                        MODEL   1175 CHEVROLET  NOVA  SET-7
                        DRIVER    TJ                 TEST HT.  181H  KG.
                        WET BULB  TEMP   1H C         DRY BULB  TEMP   2* C
                        SPEC.  HUM..   b.«» GRAM/KG    BARO.   7HS.O MM  HG.
                                                TEST NO.  2
                                                ENGINE 5.7 LITRE  B
                                                GVW    0 KG
                                                REL. HUM.  3H.3 PCT
                                                MEASURED FUEL  0.00 KG
                        DISTANCE  21.721 KM

                          RUN DURATION
                          BLOWER  INLET PRESS.
                          BLOWER  DIF.  PRESS.
                          BLOWER  INLET TEMP.
                          DYNO REVOLUTIONS
                          BLOWER  REVOLUTIONS
                          BLOWER  CU. CM /REV.
                           FUEL 738.2 G/LITRE   FUEL HC  RATIO l.BbO
                     23.21 MINUTES
                      7b2.0  MM. H20
                      7b2.0  MM  H20
                       Ht  DEG. C
                    315b7
                     112159
                     2230
                                       METER READING/SCALE
                                       PPM
                               BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
                               BACKGRD PPM
                               SAMPLE  METER READING/SCALE
                               SAMPLE  PPM
                               BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
BAG RESULTS
 HC  SAMPLE
 HC  SAMPLE
 HC
 HC
 CO
 CO
 CO
 CO  BACKGRD PPM
 C02 SAMPLE  METER READING/SCALE
 C02 SAMPLE  PERCENT
 COS BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
 C02 BACKGRD PERCENT
             METER READING/SCALE
             PPM
 NOX BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
 NOX RACKGRD PPM
 HC  CONCENTRATION PPM
 CO  CONCENTRATION PPM
 C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
 NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
 302 COCENTRATION PPM
     MASS (GRAMS)
     MASS (GRAMS)
                           NOX SAMPLE
                           NOX SAMPLE
                           HC
                           CO
     33. I/ 2
       3t
     13. 3/ Z
       13
     12.b/13
       12
      8.7/13
        8
     1b.8/ 3
     1.82
      f.b/ 3
      .07
     HS.H/ 2
     HS.H
       ,S/ 2
       .5
       22
        H
     1.7b
     »S.O
     0.0
     2.70
     I.Ob
                           C02 MASS  (GRAMS)
                           NOX MASS  (GRAMS)
                           302 MASS  (GRAMS)
                        HC  GRAMS/KM  (GRAMS/MILE)
                        CO  GRAMS/KM  (GRAMS/MILE)
                        C02 GRAMS/KM  (GRAMS/MILE)
                        NOX GRAMS/KM  (GRAMS/MILE)
                        302 GRAMS/KM  (GRAMS/MILE)
                        HC  GRAMS/KG  OF FUEL    l.S?
                        CO  GRAMS/KG  OF FUEL      .5
                        C02 GRAMS/KG  OF FUEL    31b5
                        NOX GRAMS/KG  OF FUEL    ?.»o
                        302 GRAMS/KG  OF FUEL    0.00
                                          15.77
                                           0.00
                               .12 (
                               .05 (
                               310 (
                               .73 (
                              0.00 (
 .20)
 .08)
 500)
1.17)
O.QO)
                              HC  GRAMS/MIN
                              CO  GRAMS/MIN
                              co? GRAMS/MIN
                              NOX GRAMS/MIN
                              S02 GRAMS/MIN
         .12
          .0
         210
         ,bB
        0.00
                        CARBON BALANCE FUEL ECONOMY L/100KM  (MILES/GALLON)

                        TOTAL cvs FLOH=   ao<».HSTD. cu. METRES
                                                      13.27 ( 17.73)

-------
       TABLE
                    EXHAUST EMISSIONS FROM SINGLE SAG SAMPLE
                          VEHICLE NUMBER EM9
o
u>
DATE  */2b/7B              TIME    -0 HRS.        TEST NO.  2
MODEL  1975 CHEVROLET NOVA SET-?                  ENGINE 5.7 LlTREO
RUN DURATION   23.21 MIN.  DISTANCE DRIVEN  21.77 KILOMETRES
CVS BLOWER TEST VOL.  250.07 ACT. CU. METRES
SULFATE DATA

 FILTER MO.
 SAMPLE VOL. CU. FT.
 SAMPLE TEMP. DEC. F
 SAMPLE AREA so. IN.
 DILUTION FACTOR
 STAND. DEN. MICROG/ML
 STAND. AREA 3Q. IN.
 sot,MICROG/FILTER

SULFUR DIOXIDE DATA

 SAMPLE VOL. CU. FT.
 SAMPLE TEMP. DEG. f
 AREA,BUBBLER 1
 OIL. FACT.,BUBBLER 1
 AREA,BUOBLER 2
 DIL. FACT.,BUBBLER 2
 STAND. DEN. MICROG/ML
 STAND. AREA,SQ. IN.
 302, MILLIG/BUBBLER 1
 302, MILLIG/BUBBLER 2
 302, PPM
                           SAMPLE
 H7 FH-2S25
    17.23
       71
 5SOOS.OO
        5
    20.00
15553S.no
  379.358
     1.00
       70
     0.00
        1
     0.00
        1
     1.00
     1.00
    0.000
    0.000
      0.0
SULFATE AND S02 EMISSIONS
 NET SULFATE,MILLIGRAM/TEST
 NET H2SOt,MILLIGRAM/TEST
 NET sue,GRAM/TEST
 NET SULFATE,MILLIGRAM/KILOMETRE
 NET H2SOH,MILLIGRAM/KILOMETRE
 NET 302,GRAM/KILOMETRE
             223.180
             227.Bb7
               0.000
              10.2S2
              10.»b7
               0.000
SULFUR BALANCE
 FUEL WT., 21tO GRAMS
           SULFUR/GRAMS
           PCT. RECOVERY
                          BACKGROUND
       1.00
         70
       0.00
          1
       1.00
       1.00
      0.000
       1.00
         70
       0.00
          1
       0.00
          1
       1.00
       1.00
      0.000
      0.000
        0.0
  SULFUR IN FUEL,  .0310 PCT.
   FUEL      302       H2SOH
                            .fab
            o.noo
             o.oo
                                                          302
.07HS
11.23
                                                                H2SO*
                                                                                        .07H5
                                                                                        11.23

-------
                                TABLE
                                             FXHAUST  EMISSIONS  FROM  SINGLE  BAG  SAMPLE
                                                   Vf.HICLE  NUMBER  EMS
1
w
*>.
                         DATE   H/?b/7B               TIME     -0  MRS.
                         MODEL   1S7S  CHEVROLET  NOVA  HFET
                         DRIVER   TJ                 TEST  WT.   181H  KG.
                         NET BULB  TEMP   IH  C         DRY BULB  TEMP   ?»  C
                         SPEC.  HUM.   b.H  GRAM/KG    BARO.   7HS.O  MM   HG.
                         DISTANCE   lb.3Bb  KM
                           RUN  DURATION
                           BLOWER  INLET  PRESS.
                           BLOWER  DIP.   PRESS.
                           RLOWER  INLET  TFMP.
                           OYNO REVOLUTIONS
                           BLOWER  REVOLUTIONS
                           BLOWER  CU. CM /REV.
                                                TEST NO.  3
                                                ENGINE s.7 LITRE  B
                                                GVW    0 KG
                                                REL. HUM.  3H.3 PCT
                                                MEASURED FUEL  0.00 KG
                           FUEL 738.? G/LITRE   FUEL HC  RATIO 1.8bU
                     12.75 MINUTES
                      7b?.0  MM. H?0
                      7b?.U  MM  H?0
                       H3  DEG. C
                    £3811
                      b!38S
                     2228
                                        METER  READING/SCALE
                                        PPM
                                BACKGRD  METER  READING/SCALE
                                BACKGRD  PPM
                                SAMPLE   METER  READING/SCALE
                                SAMPLE   PPM
                                BACKGRD  METER  READING/SCALE
BAG RESULTS
 HC  SAMPLE
 HC  SAMPLE
 HC
 HC
 CO
 CO
 CO
 CO  BACKGRD PPM
 C02 SAMPLE  METER READING/SCALE
 CO? SAMPLE  PERCENT
 CO? BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
 CO? BACKGKD PERCENT
             METER READING/SCALE
             PPM
 NOX BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
 NOX BACKGRD PPM
 HC  CONCENTRATION PPM
 CO  CONCENTRATION PPM
 CO? CONCENTRATION PCT
 NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
 SO? COCENTRATION PPM
     MASS (GRAMS)
     MASS (GRAMS)
                           NOX SAMPLE
                           NOX SAMPLE
                           HC
                           CO
                           CO? MASS  (GRAMS)
                           NOX MASS  (GRAMS)
                           SO? MASS  (GRAMS)

                        HC  GRAMS/KM  (GRAMS/MILE)
                        CO  GRAMS/KM  (GRAMS/MILE)
                        CO? GRAMS/KM  (GRAMS/MILE)
                        NOX GRAMS/KM  (GRAMS/MILE)
                        SO? GRAMS/KM  (GRAMS/MILE)

                        HC  GRAMS/KG  OF FUEL   1.2?
                        CO  GRAMS/KG  OF FUEL      ,H
                        CO? GRAMS/KG  OF FUEL   31bS
                        NOX GRAMS/KG  OF FUEL   7.b5
                        SO? GRAMS/KG  OF FUEL   O.nn
                               .10 (
                               .0* (
                               2b? (
                               .b5 (
                              0.00 (
                              HC  GRAMS/MIN
                              co  GRAMS/MIN
                              CO? GRAMS/MIN
                              NOX GRAMS/MIN
                              SO? GRAMS/MIN
     35.7/ ?
       3b
     12.I/ 2
       12
      S.7/13
        S
      5.3/13
        5

     2.I1*
      1.7X 2
      .Ob
     5b.O/ ?
     Sb.O
      1.1/2
      1.1
       2b
        5
     2.OS
     SS.l
     0.0
     l.bS
      .bl
  H37b.5S
    10.58
     0.00

 .17)
 .Ob)
          13
          .0
l.tlH)
0.00)
         .83
        o.on
                        CARBON BALANCE FUEL ECONOMY L/1DOKM  (MILES/GALLON)

                        TOTAL CVS FLOH=   H«».7STO. CU. METRES

-------
                                                   FABLE
                   UNIT NO.   ?h
                   VEHICLE MODEL
              IE SI NO.
          CHEVY NOVA
D
w
                   BAHOMFTER 732.54 MM OF HG.
                   DRY BULB TF.MP. '  PS.h [>EG. C
                   KEL. HUMIDITY     b4 PCI.

                   EXHAUST EMISSIONS

                        BLOWER DIP. PRKSS., G2, 7b?.0  MM.
                        BAG RESULTS
                        BAG NO.
                        BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
                                             VEHICLE  EMISSION  RESULTS
                                         1978   LIGHT  DUTY  EMISSIONS  TEST
                                   ACTUAL DISTANCES  USED  IN CALCULATIONS
                               DATE  5/17/7R                      MFGR.  CODE   -0
                               ENGINE   5.74 LITRE 8              CURB WT.      0 KG

                                                            WET  BULB TEMP   20.b DEG. C
                                                              ABS.  HUMIDITY  13.fa GRAMS/KG
                                                              COMMENTS  1178 FTPC
YR.  1975
GVM     0
                                  H20
HC
HC
HC
HC
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO?.
CO?
CO?
CO?
NOX
NOX
NOX
NOX
sue
so?
so?
so?
SAMPLE  METER Rt'ADI NG/SC ALE
SAMPLE  PPM
BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
BACKGRD PPM
SAMPLE  METER READING/SCALE
SAMPLE  PPM
BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
BACKGPD PPM
SAMPLE  METER READING/SCALE
SAMPLE  PERCENT
BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
BACKGRD PERCENT
SAMPLE  METER READING/SCALE
SAMPLE  PPM
BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
BACKGRD PPM
                             SAMPLE
                             SAMPLE
        METER READING/SCALE
        PPM
                             BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
                             BACKGRD PPM
                        HC   CONCENTRATION PPM
                        CO   CONCENTRATION PPM
                        CO?  CONCENTRATION PCT
                        NOX  CONCENTRATION PPM
                        SO?  CONCENTRATION PPM
                        HC   MASS GRAMS
                        CO   MASS GRAMS
                        CO?  MASS GRAMS
                        NOX  MASS GRAMS
                        SO?  MASS GRAMS
                        hC GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
                        CO GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
                        CO? GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
                        NUX GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
                        FUEL CONSUMPTION BY CB  L/100KM  (MPG)
                        CVS FLO* SFD. CU. METRES  (SCF)
                        CALCULATED DISTANCE KM(MlLES)
                  WEIGHTtO FUEL
                  WEIGHTED MASS
                  WEIGHTED MASS
                  WEIGHTED MASS
                  WEIGHTED MASS
                      TOTAL CVS
        CONSUMPTION LITRES/1UOKM (MPG)
        HC GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE )
        CO GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
        CO? GKAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
        NOX GKAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
        FLOW =   ?7h.4 STD. CU. METRES
                                                             BLOWER  INLET  PRESS.,  Gl 7b2.0 MM. H20
                                                             BLOWER  INLET  TEMP.    H3 DEG.  C
1
40bl7
B7.b/ 2
88
13. S/ ?
13
b9.9/u
298
1.0/11
3
41. 7/ 2
1.83
1.3/ 2
.05
42. 5/ 2
42.5
.9/ S
.9
-U.O/-0
-0.0
-0.0/-0
-0.0
7b
279
1.79
41.7
0.0
3.?b
?4.17
2437.79
b.5b
U.OO
.5b (
4.17 ( b.
4?U.fal (b?b.
1.13 ( 1.
18.31 ( 1?.
74.5 (?b?q
5 . B 11 ( 3 .
17. ?4
.35
?.5b
318. 7b
.^5
?
bSblfl
3fa.?/ ?
3b
13. 3/ ?
13
54.5/12
121
1.3/12
2
b4.5/ 3
1.15
3.7/ 3
.Ob
10. 0/ 2
10.0
.b/ e
.b
-0.0/-0
-o.n
-0.0/-0
-0.0
24
114
1.10
9.5
0.0
1.77
Ib.BR
2572. Sb
2.55
0.00
11) .29 C .4b)
71) 2.73 ( t.HO)
7b) 41b.21 (bbl.80)
82) .41 ( .bb)
85) 17.99 ( 13.08)
.3) 127. b (4505.9)
bO) b.lB ( 3.8
-------
                               TAIIIF.
                                            EXHAUST EMISSIONS FROM SINGLE BAG SAMPLE
                                                  VEHILLE NUMRER  2b
Ul
en
                       0 A t F  5 / 1 7 / 7 H
                       MODEL  1175  CHFVY  NOVA
                       DRIVER    TJ
                       WET BULK  TEMP   m  C
                       SPFC. HUM.   IP. 8  GRAM/KG
     TIME   ?as MRS.
     SET-7
     TEST WT.  181H KG.
     DRY BULB TEMP  27 C
     BARO.  733.5 MM  HG.
                                                TEST NO.  2
                                                ENGINE 5.7 LITREV  R
                                                GVW    0 KG
                                                REL. HUM.  H7.8 PCT
                                                MEASURED FUEL  n.un  KG
                       DISTANCE
                                         KM
                                                     FUEL 738.S G/LITRE   FUEL HC   RATIO  l.BbU
                         RUN DURATION
                         BLOWER  INLET  PKES.H.
                         PLIMtH  DIF.   PRESS.
                         BLOWER  INLET  TEKP.
                         DYNll REVOLUTIONS
                         BLOWER  REVOLUTIONS
                         PLIMEH  CU. CM /REV.
 23.2S MINUTES
  7b2.0  MM. H20
  7b2.0  MM  H20
   f3  DEG. C
31708
 112273
 aa?7
                         BAG RESULTS
                          HC  SAMPLE
                          HC  SAMPLE
            METER READING/SCALE
            PPM
HC  BACKGRD MtTER RtADING/SCALE
HC  NACKGRO PPM
CO  SAMPLE
CO  SAMPLE
                MtTEH READING/SCALE
                PPM
   CO   BACKGRD  MtTF.R READING/SCALE
   CO   BACKGRD  PPM
   C02  SAMPLE   MhTF.K READING/SCALE
   COa  SAMPLE   PERCENT
   C02  BACKGRD  METER READING/SCALE
   COa  HACKGRO  PERCENT
   NOX  SAMPLE   MKTER READING/SCALE
   NOX  SAMPLE   PPM
   NOX  BACKGRD  MhTER READING/SCALE
   NOX  BACKGRD  PPM
   HC   CONCENTRATION PPM
   CO   CONCENTRATION PPM
   CUa  CONCENTRATION PCT
   NOX  CONCENTRATION PPM
   SOa  COCENTRATIDN  PPM
   HC   MASS  (GKAMS)
   CO   MASS  (GRAMS)
   C02  MASS  (GRANS)
   NOX  MASS  (GRAMS)
   SOa  MASS  (GRAMS)

HC  GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
CO  GRAMf./KM (GRAKS/MILE)
CO? GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
NOX GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
SO? GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)

HC  C.^AMS/KG OF FUEL   i.st
CO  GKAMS/KG OF FUfL    2.8
CO? l,"AMS/KG UF FULL   31bl
MIX i.RAMS/KG OF FUEL   7.»2
SO? GRAMS/KG OF FUFL   0.00
                       35.b/ a
                         3b
                       13.I/ 2
                         !•»
                       30.1/13
                         28
                        3.2/13
                          3
                       H1.2/ 2
                       i.an
                        i.s/ a
                        .05
                       -»n.2/ a
                       »o.a
                        i.o/ a
                        i.o
                         af
                         2H
                       1.7b
                                                                     0.0
                                                                     2.BO
                                                                     5.8H
                                                                  bblt.tO
                                                                    15.52
                                                                     0.00

                                                                 -ai)
                                                                 ,H3)
           .13 (
           .27 (
           303 (
           .71 (  l.lf)
          o.oo (  o.nn)
                                                        HC   GRAMS/MIN
                                                        CO   GRAMS/MIN
                                                        coe  GRAMS/MIN
                                                        NOX  GRAMS/MIN
                                                        soe  GRAMS/MIN
                             .3
                           as1*
                           .b7
                          o.on
                             J BALANCt FUFL KCONUMY  L/1HUKM  (MILES/GALLON)

                       TOTAL uvs FLOW:   cJus.iSTn.  cu.  M
                                         (  18.13)

-------
                              TABLE
O
w
                    EXHAUST EMISSIONS FROM SINGLE BAG SAMPLE
                          VEHICLE NUMBER  2b
                       DATE   5/17/78               TIME    325  HRS.         TEST  NO.   8
                       MODEL   1975  CHEVY  NOVA      SET-7                   ENGINE  5.7 LITREO
                       RUN DURATION   23.59  MIN.   DISTANCE  DRIVEN   31.77  KILOMETRES
                       CVS BLOWER TEST  VOL.  25U.02  ACT.  CU.  METRES
                           SAMPLE
3ULFATE DATA	

 FILTER NO.              H7FH-293S
 SAMPLE VOL. CU. FT.        17.51
 SAMPLE TEMP. DEC. F           87
 SAMPLE AREA SO. IN.     7273*.00
 DILUTION FACTOR                1
 STAND. DEN. MICROG/ML       5.00
 STAND. AREA SQ. IN.    15bS39.00
 SOt,MICROG/FILTER         23.232

SULFUR DIOXIDE DATA

 SAMPLE VOL. CU. FT.         1.00
 SAMPLE TEMP. DEG. F           ?o
 AREA,BUBBLER 1              0.00
 OIL. FACT.,BUBBLER 1           1
 AREA,BUBBLER 2              0.00
 OIL. FACT.,BUBBLER 2           1
 STAND. DEN. MICROG/ML       1.00
 STAND. AREA,SQ. IN.         1.00
 S02, MILLIG/BUBBLER 1      0.000
 302, MILLIG/BUBBLER 2      0.000
 302, PPM                     0.0

SULFATE AND S02 EMISSIONS

 NET SULFATE,MILLIGRAM/TEST
 NET H2S01,MILLIGRAM/TEST
 NET 302,GRAM/TEST
 NET 3ULFATE,MILLIGRAM/KILOMETRE
 NET H2SOt,MILLIGRAM/KILOMETRE
 NET S02»GRAM/KILOMETRE
                       SULFUR  BALANCE
                        FUEL WT.,  2102  GRAMS
                                  SULFUR,GRAMS
                                  PCT.  RECOVERY
                                                             13.242
                                                             13.520
                                                              o.ono
                                                               . bOB
                                                               .b21
                                                              0.000
                                                                         BACKGROUND
                                                                             1.00
                                                                               70
                                                                             0.00
                                                                                1
                                                                             1.00
                                                                             1.00
                                                                            0.000
                  1.00
                    70
                  0.00
                     1
                  0.00
                     1
                  1.00
                  1.00
                 0.000
                 0.000
                   0.0
                          SULFUR IN FUEL, .0310 PCT.
                           FUEL      302       H2SOf
                            .b5
0.000
 0.00
                                                                                302 + H2SOt
                                                 ,b8
                            .b8

-------
                              r AHLF.
oo
                                          FXHAU3T EMISSIONS FROM SINuLE  BAG SAMPLE
                                                VEHICLE NUMBER  2b
                      OATt  S/17/7H
                      MODEL  1H75 CHEVY NOVA
                      PRIVFR    TJ
                      HET HIILB  TEMP  ?1 L
                      SPFC. HUM.  .13.4 GRAM/KG
                      DISTANCE  lb.41H KM
                            TIME     -II  HRS.
                            HFET
                            TEST  WT.   181*  KG.
                            DRY RULB  TEMP   ?R  C
                            HARO.   732.5 MM  HG.
                                                   TEST  NO.   3
                                                   ENGINE  5.7 LITRE   B
                                                   GVW     0  KG
                                                   REL.  HUM.  55.3 PCT
                                                   MEASURED  FUEL  O.OM  KG
                              FUEL  73K.2  G/LITRE    FUEL  HC   RATIO  l.BbU
                        HUN DURATION
                        RLUWER INLET PMKSS.
                        BLOWER DIF.  PRESS.
                        KLUXER INLET ThMp.
                        DYNO REVOLUTIONS
                        HLOWER REVOLUTIONS
                        RLOWER CU. CM /REV.
                        ie.7b  MINUTES
                         7b2.o   MM.
                         7b2.0   MM   H?0
                          43   DEC. C
                       23853
                         b!5B3
                        22?S
  PAG RESULTS
   HC  SAMPLE   MEUR  READING/SCALE
   HC  SAMPLE   PPM
   HC  HACKGHD  MKTER  HEADING/SCALE
   HC  BACKGRO  PPM
   CO  SAMPLE   METER  READING/SCALE
   CU  SAMPLE   PPK
   CO  HACKGRD  MtTER  READING/SCALE
   CO  BACKGHO  PPM
   CO? SAMPLE   MUFR  READING/SCALE
   COS SAMPLE   PERCENT
   CO? BACKGRD  METER  READING/SCALE
   COS BACKGHD  PfRCENT
   NOX SAMPLE   MtTEH  READING/SCALE
   NMX SAMPLF   PPM
   NOX HACKGRD  MtTER  READING/SCALE
   NOX OACKGRD  PPM
   HC  CONCENTHAlION  PPM
   CO  CONCENTRATION  PPM
   CO? CONCENTRATION  PCT
   NOX CONCENTRATION  PPM
   302 COCENTRATION PPM
   HC  MASS (GRAMS)
   CO  MASS (GHAMS)
   C02 MASS (GRAMS)
   NOX MASS (GRAMS)
   SO? MASS (GRAMS)

HC  GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
CO  GPAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
CO? GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
NOX bWAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
SO? GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
                                              35. t/  ?
                                                35
                                              13.?/  ?
                                                1H
                                              ?U.h/13
                                                an
                                               2.8/13
                                                3
                                              HS.OX  2
                                              ?.?3
                                               l.f/  2
                                               .US
                                              sa.o/  a
                                              52. 0
                                                .?/  z
                                                .7
                                                24
                                                Ib
                                              2.18
                                              51.4
                                              o.n
                                              l.Sb
                                              2.13
                                          1518.13
                                            12.19
                                              0.00
                                                       .10 (
                                                       .13 (
                                                       ?75 (
                                                       .74 (
                                                      o.no (
                                         .15)
                                         .21)
                                         443)
                                         1.11)
                                         o.nu)
HC
CO
    GRAMS/KG OF FUEL
    GHAMS/KR OF FUFL
TO? UHAMS/KG OF FUFL
MIX C.RAhS/KG UF FUFL
SO? UKAM3/KG OF FUeL
                                             1.01
                                              1.5
                                             31b4
                                             8.53
                                             (1.0(1
HC  GRAHS/MlN
CO  GRAMS/MIN
C02 GRAMS/MIN
NOX GRAMS/MIN
SO? GRAMS/MIN
 .12
  .2
 354
 .^b
O.UO
                             HALANCt Fl'FL ECONOMY L/10UKM ( M 1 LF S / G ALL ON )

                             wr, fLOW=   lla.lSID. CU. METRtS
                                                         11.77  (  iq.99)

-------
                                        TABLE
        UNTT  NO.
        VEHICLE MUDEL
              TEST NO.
          NOVA CHEVY
                                             VEHICLE  EMISSION  RESULTS
                                          1978  LIGHT  DUTY  EMISSIONS  TEST
                                   ACTUAL DISTANCES  USED  IN CALCULATIONS
                               DATE  5/a?/78                      MFGR.  CODE
                               ENGINE   5.7* LITRE 8              CURB  WT.
-0
0 KG
YR.  1175
GVM     0 KG
D
W
        BAROMETER  71S.SU  MM  OF  HG.
        •DRY BULB TEMP.    ?1.H OEG..C
        REL. HUMIDITY      fH  PCT.

        EXHAUST EMISSIONS

             BLOWER  DIF.  PRKSS.,  G2,  7fq.3 MM.
             RAG RESULTS
             BAG NO.
             BLOWER  REVOLUTIONS
             HC
             HC
             HC
             HC
             CO
             CO
             CO
             CO
             co?
             COB
                                  H?0
             METER HEADING/SCALE
             PPM
SAMPLE
SAMPLE
OACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
8ACKGKD PPM
SAMPLE  METER READING/SCALE
SAMPLE  PPM
BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
BACKGRD PPM
SAMPLE
SAMPLE
             METER READING/SCALE
             PERCENT
CO?  HACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
CO?  RACKGRD PERCENT
NOX  SAMPLE  MFTER READING/SCALE
NOX  SAMPLE  PPM
NOX  8ACKGRO METER READING/SCALE
NOX  RACKGRD PPM
SO?  SAMPLE  METER READING/SCALE
SO?  SAMPLE  PPM
SO?  BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
SO?  BACKGHD PPM

HC   CONCENTRATION PPM
CO   CONCENTRATION PPM
CO?  CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX  CONCENTRATION PPM
SO?  CONCENTRATION PPM
HC   MASS GRAMS
CO   MASS GRAMS
CO?  MASS GRAMS
NOX  MASS GRAMS
SO?  MASS GRAMS
HC GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
CO GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
CO? GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
NOX GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
FUEL CONSUMPTION BY CB  L/100KM (MPG)
CVS FLOW STD. CU. METRES (SCF)
CALCULATED DISTANCE KM(MILES)
       WEIGHTED FUEL
       WEIGHTED MASS
       WEIGHTED MASS
       WEIGHTED MASS
       WEIGHTED MASS
           TOTAL CVS
        CONSUMPTION LITKFS/IUOKM (MPG)
        HC GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
        CO GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
        CO? GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
        NOX GRAMS/KM fGRAMS/MILE)
        FLOW =   ?71.b STD. CU. METRES
                                                                  WET  BULB  TEMP   17.? DEC.  C
                                                                   ABS.  HUMIDITY    1.5 GRAMS/KG
                                                                   COMMENTS  1978 FTP-C
                                                             BLOWER  INLET  PRESS.,  Gl  711.3 MM.  HgO
                                                             BLOWER  INLET  TEMP.    11  DEG.  C
1
1Ub?1
BB.8/ ?
81
11. b/ ?
1?
83.1/11
381
.b/11
?
Ib.l/ 3
1.81
3. 1/ 3
.05
31. 7/ 2
31.7
l.O/ 2
1.0
-0.0/-0
-0.0
-0.0/-0
-0.0
7q
3b8
1.7b
33.8
0.0
3.12
32.21
2130. bl
H.bi
0.00
.bO (
5.b3 C 1.
1?1.07 (b8?.
.8? ( 1 .
18. Sb ( 1?.
75. •* (?bbl
5.73 ( 3.
17.03
.30
?.5?
3St.Ot
.50
?
blfbl
?b,3/ 2
?b
11. IX 2
11
88.2/13
81
?.b/13
3
bl.S/ 3
1.01
3.*/ 3
.05
S.»X 2
l.t
.b/ 2
.b
-0.0/-0
-0.0
-0.0/-0
-0.0
Ib
83
1.05
8.8
0.0
1.20
12. t7
?tbS.37
?.10
0.00
Ib) .20 ( .31)
Ob) 2.0t ( 3.28)
33) t02.53 (b»7.bb)
32) .3H ( .55)
b8) 17.31 ( 13.5fa)
.•») 1?8.B C*S50.0)
Sb) b.12 C 3.81)
( 13.82)
C .-*8)
( t.Ob)
Cb3H.01)
( .80)
3
tOb!3
t5.3/ 2
ts
11. 3/ 2
11
7b.8/13
7b
2.1/13
2
81. t/ 3
1.50
2. 1/ 3
.03
22. I/ 2
22.1
.8/ 2
.8
-0.0/-0
-0.0
-0.0/-0
-0.0
35
71
1.H7
22.2
0.0
1.53
b.11
2028. Ib
3.07
0.00
.27 (
1.01 ( 1.
355.38 (571.
.51 (
15.28 ( 15.
75.3 (2bbO
5.71 ( 3.





































H3)
75)
80)
87)
fO)
.t)
55)






-------
                               I AHl.t
                                            EXHAUST EMISSIONS FROM SINGLE BAG SAMPLE
                                                  VEHICLE NUMBER EMI
                        Dftit  s / ? e / 7 a
                        MODEL  1975 NUVA CHEVY
                        DRIVER   BP
                        WE T BULH TFMP  17 C
                        SPEC. HUM.   p.i GRAM/KG
                        DISTANCE  ?] .531) KM
                    TIME    -0 MRS.
                    SET-7
                    TEST HT.  181H KG.
                    DRY BULB TEMP  ?b C
                    BARO.  73S.H MM  HG.
                                                TEST NO.  2
                                                ENGINE 5.7 LITREV  8
                                                GVM    Q KG
                                                REL. HUM.  37.5 PCT
                                                MEASURED FUEL  0.00  KG
                                                     FUEL 738.? G/LITRE   FUEL HC  RATIO  l.BhO
                          PUN DURATION
                          BLOWER iNLtT PRESS.
                          BLOWER DIF.  PRESS.
                          BLOWER INLET TEMP.
                          [UNO REVOLUTIONS
                          BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
                          BLOWER CU. CM /RtV.
                23.21 MINUTES
                 7H9.3  MM. H20
                 7*9.3  MM  H?0
                  H*  DEG. C
               31289
                115129
                ?233
D
I
                              RESULTS
                               SAMPLE
                               SAMPLE
        METER READING/SCALE
        PPM
OACKGWD MtTER READING/SCALE
HACKGRD PPM
SAMPLE
SAMPLE
                                       MFTER READING/SCALE
                                       PPM
                               BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
BAG
 HC
 HC
 HC
 HC
 CO
 CO
 CO
 CO  BACKGHD PPM
 C02 SAMPLE  METER READING/SCALE
 COS SAMPLE  PERCENT
 CO? BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
 COS BACKGRD PERCENT
             MtTEW RtADING/SCALE
             PPM
 NOX BACKGHD MtTER READING/SCALE
 NOX RACKGKD PPM
 HC  CONCENTRATION PPM
 CO  CONCENTRATION PPM
 CO? CONCENTRATION PCT
 NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
 SO? COCENTRAT10N PPM
     MASS (GRAMS)
     MASS (GRAMS)
                           NOX SAMPLE
                           NUX SAMPLE
                           HC
                           CO
                           CO? MASS (GRAMS)
                           NOX MASS (GRAMS)
                           SO? MASS (GRAMS)

                        HC  GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
                        CO  GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
                        CO? GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
                        NOX GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
                        so? GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)

                        HC  GRAMS/KG QF FUEL   i.ib
                        CO  GRAMS/KG OF FUEL   11.5
                        CO? GRAMS/KG OF FUEL   31*8
                        NOX GRAMS/hG OF FUEL   H.98
                        SO? GRAMS/KG OF FUEL   tl.no
                          .12 (
                         l.lb (
                          317 (
                          .5U (
                         o.no (
  35
lb.7/ ?
  17
HI. 0/12
 108
 l.b/12
   3
1S.7/ 3
1.80
 3.«»/ 3
 .Ob
21. 5X 2
21.5
                                        20
                                       100
                                      1.75
                                      28.7
                                      0.0
                                      2.52
                                   b832.bq
                                     10.81
                                      0.00
                                       .11)
                                      1.87)
                                       511)
                                       .81)
                                      o.nn)
                         HC  GRAMS/MIN
                         CO  GRAMS/MIN
                         CO? GRAMS/MIN
                         NOX GRAMS/MIN
                         302 GRAMS/MIN
                                               .11
                                               1.1
                                               213
                                               .»b
                                              0.00
                        C»RBON BALANCE FUEL ECONOMY L/IOOKM (MILES/GALLON)

                        TOT4L  LVS FLOW=   813.8STD. CU. METRES
                                                 13.bH  ( 17.2S)

-------
                             TABLE
                                          EXHAUST  EMISSIONS  FROM  SINGLE  BAG  SAMPLE
                                                VEHICLE  NUMBER  EMI
D
                     DATE  5/52/78               TIME     -0  MRS.         TEST  NO.   2
                     MODEL  1175  NOVA  CHEVY      SET-7                   ENGINE  5.7 LITREO
                     RUN DURATION   33.aq MIN.   DISTANCE  DRIVEN   21.7t  KILOMETRES
                     CVS BLOWER TEST VOL.  257.12  ACT.  CU.  METRES
                           SAMPLE
SULFATE DATA               	

 FILTER NO.              t?FH-2S3B
 SAMPLE VOL. CU. FT.        17.IS
 SAMPLE TEMP. DEG. F           77
 SAMPLE AREA SQ. IN.     7b79t.OO
 DILUTION FACTOR                1
 STAND. DEN. MICROG/ML       5.00
 STAND. AREA SQ. IN.    I*bb57.00
 SOt,MICROG/FILTER         2b.lBl

SULFUR DIOXIDE DATA

 SAMPLE VOL. CU. FT.         1.00
 SAMPLE TEMP. DEG. F           ?o
 AREA,BUBBLER 1              0.00
 OIL. FACT.,BUBBLER 1           1
 AREA,BUBBLER 2              0.00
 DIL. FACT.,BUBBLER 2           1
 STAND. DEN. MICROG/ML       1.00
 STAND. AREA,SQ. IN.         1.00
 302, MILLIG/BUBBLER 1      0.000
 302, MILLIG/BUBBLER 2      0.000
 302, PPM                     0.0

SULFATE AND S02 EMISSIONS
                                                                        BACKGROUND
                                                                            1.00
                                                                              70
                                                                            0.00
                                                                               1
                                                                            1.00
                                                                            1.00
                                                                           0.000
 1.00
   70
 0.00
    1
 0.00
    1
 1.00
 1.00
0.000
0.000
  0.0
NET SULFATE, MILLIGRAM/TEST
NET H2sot, MILLIGRAM/TEST
NET 302, GRAM/TEST
NET SULFATE, MILLIGRAM/KILOMETRE
NET H2SOt, MILLIGRAM/KILOMETRE
NET 302, GRAM/KILOMETRE
SULFUR BALANCE
FUEL WT., 2180 GRAMS SULFUR
FUEL
SULFUR, GRAMS ,b8
PCT. RECOVERY
15.921
lb.2S5
0.000
.732
.748
0.000
IN FUEL, .0310
302
0.000
0.00
PCT.
H2SO*
.0053
.79
                                                                               302 + H2SO
-------
                            TAHLE
                                         EXHAUST EMISSIONS FROM SINGLE BAG SAMPLE
                                               VEHICLE NUMBER EM9
D
                     OATE  SAV/7R
                     MODEL  1^75 NOVA CHEVY
                     DRIVEP   BP
                     WET BULB TEMP  i? C
                     SPEC. HUM.    8.8 GRAM/KG
                     DISTANCE  lb.285 KM
                           TIME    -0 MRS.
                           FET
                           TEST WT.  181* KG.
                           DRY BULB TEMP  ?b C
                           BARD.   739.H MM  HG.
                             FUEL  738.2 G/LITRE
          TEST NO.
          ENGINE 5
          GVH    0 KG
          REL. HUM.  HO
          MEASURED FUEL
          FUEL HC
7 LlTREV fl

       PCT
      0.00 KG
RATIO 1.8bO
                       RUN DURATION
                       B|_OWtR INLtl PRESS.
                       BLOWER 1>IF.  PRESS.
                       BLOWER INLET TFMP.
                       nYNO REVOLUTIONS
                       BLOWER REVULUTIONS
                       BLOWER CU. CM /REV.
                       12.75 MINUTES
                         7H9.3  MM. H20
                         7*9.3  MM  H?0
                         HH  OEG. C
                      ?3bb7
                         b!391
                       2230
                                    METER READING/SCALE
                                    PPM
                            BACKGRO METER READING/SCALE
                            BACKGRO PPM
                            SAMPLE  MT.TFR READING/SCALE
                            SAMPLE  PPM
                            BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
  BAG RESULTS
   HC  SAMPLE
   HC  SAMPLE
   HC
   HC
   CO
   CO
   CO
   CO  BACKGRO PPM
   C02 SAMPLE  METER READING/SCALE
   C02 SAMPLE  PtHCENT
   COS BACKGRO METER READING/SCALE
   C02 HACKGRO PERCENT
   NOX SAMPLE  MEIER READING/SCALE
   NOX SAMPLE  PPM
   NOX BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
   NOX BACKGRO PPM
   HC  CONCENTRATION PPM
   CO  CONCENTRATION PPM
   CO? CONCENTRATION PCT
   NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
   SO? COCENTRATION PPM
   HC  MASS (GRAMS)
   CO  MASS (GRAMS)
   C02 MASS (GRAMS)
   NOX MASS (GRAMS)
   302 MASS (GRAMS)

HC  GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
CO  GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
CO? GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
NOX GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
SO? GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)

HC  GRAMS/KG OF FUEL   1.1H
CO  GRAMS/KG OF FUEL    H . 9
CO? GRAMS/KG OF FUEL   315R
NOX GRAMS/KG OF FUEL   S.bO
SO? GRAMS/KG OF FUFL   O.flll
                                                      .10 (
                                                      .»3 C
                                                      280 (
                                                      .50 (
                                                     n.oo (
     39. 9/ 2
       HO
     17. 9/ 2
       18
     bO.b/13
       58
      2. fa/13
        3
     H9.7/ 2
     2.27
      2.S/ 2
      .09
     H0.3/ 2
     HO. 3
                                                                    .9
                                                                    25
                                                                    S3
                                                                  2.19
                                                                  39. b
                                                                  0.0
                                                                  l.bH
                                                                  7.02
                                                               H5b3.03
                                                                  8.09
                                                                  0.00
 .b9)
 H51)
 .80)
O.MO)
                                                     HC  GRAMS/MIN    .13
                                                     CO  GRAMS/MIN     ,b
                                                     CO? GRAMS/MIN    358
                                                     NOX GRAMS/MIN    .b3
                                                     302 GRAMS/MIN   0.00
                     CARBON BALANCE FUFL ECONOMY L/lOfJKM (MILES/GALLON)

                     TOT»L CVS FLOH=   1H.1STO. CU. METRES
                                                         12.00  (  IS.bO)

-------
                APPENDIX E

             COMPUTER PRINTOUTS
                    FOR
 THREEWAY CATALYST SYSTEM OPTIMIZATION AND
DURABILITY TESTS ON THE 1977 PLYMOUTH FURY
       (Tests in Chronological Order)

-------
UNIT NO.  EHR
VEHICLE MODEL
    TEST Nl).
PLYMOUTH FURY
 TABLE                    VEHICLE EMISSION RESULTS
                 1975  LIKHT DUTY EMISSIONS TEST
*          DATE  3/30/77                     MFGR.  CODE
           ENG1NF   5.90 LITRE B             CURB WT.
        -0
        0 KG
YR.
GVM
1977
   0 KG
BAROMFTER 7H0.92 MM OF HG.
DRY HIILB TEMP.   2H.H DEG. C
     HUMIDITY     ?9 PCT.
FXHAUST EMISSIONS

     BLOWER DIF. PRfcSS.,
     RAG RESULTS
     RAT, NO.
     OLOWER REVOLUTIONS
          G2, 71) .2 MM. H20
HC
HC
HC
HC
CO
CO
CO
co
C02
C02
CO?
C02
MOX
NOX
« NOX
NJ NOX
S02
302
302
S02
HC
CO
C02
NOX
302
HC
CO
C02
NOX
302
SAMPLE METER READING/SCALE
SAMPLF PPM
BACKGRO MFTER READING/SCALE
BACKGRD PPM
SAMPLE METER READING/SCALE
SAMPLE PPM
HACKGRD MFTER READING/SCALE
BACKGRD PPM
SAMPLE MFTER READING/SCALE
SAMPLE PERCENT
RACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
BACKGRO PERCENT
SAMPLE METER READING/SCALE
SAMPLE PPM
BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
BACKGRD PPM
SAMPLE METFR READING/SCALE
SAMPLE PPM
BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
BACKGRD PPM
CONCENTRATION PPM
CONCENTRATION PPM
CONCENTRATION PCT
CONCENTRATION PPM
CONCENTRATION PPM
MASS GRAMS
MASS GRAMS
MASS GRAMS
MASS GRAMS
MASS GRAMS
                                    1
                                 *2*2n
                                  32.9/ 3
                                   329
                                    .b/ 3
                                     b
                                  85.f/ 3
                                  2377
                                    .!/ 3
                                     2
                                  *3.8/ 2
                                  1.9*
                                   1.7/2
                                   .Ob
                                  70.O/ 3
                                 210.0
                                    .!/ 3
                                    .3
                                  -0.0/-0
                                  -0.0
                                  -0.0/-0
                                  -0.0

                                   32*
                                  22b>f
                                  1.B9
                                 209.7
                                   0.0
                                 1*.B3
                                209.2*
                               27Sb.70
                                 27.28
                                  0.00
     WEIGHTED  MASS HC
     WEIGHTED  MASS CO
     WEIGHTED  MASS C02
     WEIGHTED  MASS NOX
     WEIGHTED  MASS S02
            2.00  GRAMS/KILOMETRE
           19.0*  GRAMS/KILOMETRE
          *99.21  GRAMS/KILOMETRE
            5.f7  GRAMS/KILOMETRE
            n.tltl  GRAMS/KILOMETRE
                                                       WET BULB TEMP  13.9 DEG. C
                                                        ABS. HUMIDITY   S.b GRAMS/KG
                                        BLOWER INLET PRESS.,  Gl 711.2 MM. H20
                                        BLOWER INLET TEMP.   * 3 DEG. C
                                      2
                                   7*713
                                    lb.1/  3
                                     Ibl
                                     l.O/  3
                                      10
                                    25.b/  3
                                     59b
                                      .!/  3
                                       2
                                    32.I/  2
                                    1.31
                                     1.7/  2
                                     .Ob
                                    *9.1/  3
                                   1*7.3
                                      .3/  3
                                      .9
                                    -0.0/-0
                                    -0.0
                                    -0.0/-0
                                    -0.0

                                     152
                                     57*
                                    1.29
                                   l*b.5
                                     0.0
                                   12. 2b
                                   93.35
                                 3311.78
                                   33.55
                                    0.00
     3
  *3029
   21.S/ 3
    215
     .b/ 3
      b
   38.O/ 3
    911
     .!/ 3
      2
   *2.1/ 2
   1.85
    1.3/ 2
    .05
   91.9/ 3
  275.7
     .2/ 3
     .b
   -0.0/-0
   -0.0
   -0.0/-0
   -0.0

    210
    8b8
   1.81
  275.2
    0.0
   9.7*
  81.39
2b78.98
  3b.30
   0.00
  CA9BON  BALANCE  FUEL  CONSUMPTION = 22.81 LITRES PER HUNDRED KILOMETRES
  TOTAL CVS  FLOW  =    299.7 STD. CU. METRES

-------
                                 TARI.E
H

OJ
                                              EXHAUST EMISSIONS FROM SINGLE BAG SAMPLE
                                                    VEHICLE NUMHFR
                         DATE   3/3U/77
                         MODEL   1177  PLYMOUTH  FURY
                         DRIVER    SH
                         WET RULB  TEMP   lb  C
                         SPKC.  HUM.   b.fl  GKArt/KG
                            TIME     -0  HRS.
                            SET 7
                            TEST WT.  9)77  KG.
                            DRY BULB  TEMP   2b C
                            BARO.   7tl.7 MM  HG.
                                                 TEST  NO.   2
                                                 ENGINE  5.1 LITRE   R
                                                 GVW     0  KG
                                                 REL.  HUM.  31.5 PCT
                                                 MEASURED  FUEL  0.00  KG
                           RUN  DURATION
                           BLOWER  INLET  PRESS.
                           BLOWER  DIF.<   P^ESS.
                           RLOWER  INLET  TFMP.
                           DYNO REVOLUTIONS
                           RLCMER  REVOLUTIONS
                           BLOWER  CU. CM /REV.
                       2H.31 MINIJTE3
                       73b.h  MM. H20
                             MM  H20
                    73b.b
                       H3
                    3HHR5
                             OEG. C
                       2230
               METER READING/SCALE
RAG RESULTS
 HC  SAMPLE
 HC  SAMPLE
 HC  BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
 HC  BACKGRD PPM
 CO  SAMPLE  METER READING/SCALE
 CO  SAMPLE  PPM
 CO  BACKGHD MFTER READING/SCALE
 CO  BACKGRD PPM
 C02 SAMPLE  METER READING/SCALE
 C02 SAMPLE  PERCENT
 CO? BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
 CO? BACKGRD PERCENT
 NOX SAMPLE  METER READING/SCALE
 NOX SAMPLE  PPM
 NOX BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
 NOX BACKGRD PPM
 HC  CONCENTRATION PPM
 CO  CONCENTRATION PPM
 C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
 NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
 S02 COCENTRATION PPM
 HC  MASS (GRAMS)
 CO  MASS (GRAMS)
 CO? MASS (GRAMS)
 NOX MASS (GRAMS)
 S02 MASS (GRAMS)
HC  GRAMS/KILOMETRE     i.ot
CO  GRAMS/KILOMETRE    10.15
co? GRAMS/KILOMETRE   32b
NOX GRAMS/KILOMETRE     H.2i
S02 GRAMS/KILOMETRE     U.OO

HC  GRAMS/KG OF FUEL   q.SH
co  GRAMS/KG UF FUEL   13.2
C0?_ GHAMS/KG OF FUEL   ?S13
NOX GRAMS/KG OF FUEL  31.tn
sop GRAMS/KG OF FUEL   o.nn
                                                                       ao.b/3
                                                                        20t>
                                                                         .1/3
                                                                          q
                                                                       f l.H/3
                                                                       1010
                                                                         .1/3
                                                                          2
                                                                       H4.8/2
                                                                       1.11
                                               .05
                                             28.0/H
                                            280.0
                                                .I/1*
                                               1.0
                                               118
                                               IbO
                                             1.15
                                            271.2
                                             0.0
                                            25.01
                                           2ft. 11
                                                                     ins, 28
                                                                       0.00
                                                          HC   GRAMS/MIN    1.03
                                                          co   GRAMS/MIN    10.0
                                                          C02  GRAMS/MIN     323
                                                          NOX  GRAMS/MIN    H.25
                                                          SO?.  GRAMS/MIN    0.00
                         CARBON BALANCE FUEL ECONOMY  =    It.83  LITRES  PER  HUNDRED  KILOMETERS

-------
                               TAHLE
                                            EXHAUST EMISSIONS FROM  SINGLE  BAG  SAMPLE
                                                  VEHICLE NUMBER
                        DATE  1/TO/77              TIME    -0 MRS.         TEST  NO.   ?
                        MODEL  1^7? PLYMOUTH FURY  SET 7                   ENGINE  s.i LITHEO
                        HUN DUHATI'M   2>f,31 MIN.  DISTANCE DRIVEN   2f.05  KILOMETRES
                        CVS HLIHEH TEST VOL.  2bl.3n ACT. CU. METRES
                        3UI.FATE DATA
                                                   SAMPLE
                                                                           BACKGROUND
W
I
                              H NO.              »7FH-27S8
                         SAMPLE VOL. CU. FT.        12. IS
                         SAMPLE TEMP. HE<~,. F           81
                         SAMPLE AKEA SO. IN.    1P7790.00
                         DILUTION FACTOR                i
                         STAND. DEN. MICHOG/ML       5.00
                         STAND. AREA 30. IN.    ?lb575.00
                         90t ,MICROR/F ILTKR         2
SULFUR DIOXIDE DATA
 SAMPLE VOL. CU. FT.          1.00
 SAMPLE TEMP. DEG. F            70
 AREA, BIIBBLEK 1               0.00
 OIL. FACT.,BUBBLER  I            1
 AREA,fll|RBLEK ?               0.0(1
 OIL. FACT.,BUBBLER  2            1
 STAND. DEN. MICROG/ML        1.00
 STAND. AKEA,SO. IN.          1.00
 302, MILLIG/BUB6LER 1      0.000
 302, MILLIG/BUBBLER 2      o.ooo
 302, PPM                      0.0

SULFATE AND 302 EMISSIONS

 NFT SULFATE,MILLIGRAM/TEST            25.433
 NFT H2sot,MILLIGRAM/TEST              25.sb?
 NET so2,GRAM/TEST                      o.ooo
 NET SULFATE,MILLIGRAM/KILOMETRE        1.057
 NET H2SOt,MILLIGRAM/KILOMETRE          1.080
 NET 302,GRAM/KILOMETRE                 0.000
                        SULFUR  BALANCE
                         FUEL  NT.,  2b21  GRAMS
                                   SULFUR,GRAMS
                                   PCT.  RECOVERY
                             1 .00
                               70
                             0.00
                                1
                             1.00
                             1 .00
                            0.000
                             1.0(1
                               70
                             0.00
                                1
                             0.00
                                1
                             1.00
                             1.00
                            0.000
                            0.000
                              0.0
  .8*
                                    0.000
                                     0.00
SULFUR IN FUEL, .0320 PCT.
 FUEL      S02       H2SOt
.0085
 1.01
302 + H2SOH

    .0085
     l.ni

-------
        TABLE
                     KXHAU3T  EMISSIONS  FROM  SINGLE  BAG SAMPLE
                           VEHICLE  NUMBER
DATE  3/10/77
MODEL  1977 PLYMOUTH FURY
DRIVER   SH
WET 3ULH TEMP  it, c
SPEC. HUM.   5.8 GRAM/KG
                          TIME     -a  HRS.
                          H FET
                          TEST WT.  ai?7  KG.
                          ORY BULB  TEMP   28  C
                          BARO.   7tl.7 MM  HG.
TEST NO.  3
ENGINE 5.9 LITREV 8
GVW    0 KG
REL. HUM.  23.B PCT
MEASURED FUEL  U.OO KG
RUN DURATION         15.10 MINUTES
RLOWKH INLET PRESS. 723.9  MM. H20
BLOWER DIF.  PHF.SS. 753.1  MM  H20
BLOWEK INLET TE'IP.     13  DEG. C
DYNO REVOLUTIONS    28935
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS    72851
BLOWER CU. CM /REV.  2231

BAG RESULTS
 HC  SAMPLE  METER READING/SCALE
 HC  SAMPLE  PPM
 HC  BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
 HC  BACKGRO PPM
 CO  SAMPLE  METFR READING/SCALE
 CO  SAMPLE  PPM
 CO  HACKGRD METER ME AOING/SC ALE
 CO  BACKGKD PPM
 C02 SAMPLE  METER HEADING/SCALE
 C02 SAMPLE  PERCENT
 CO? BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
 C02 flACKGRD PERCENT
 NOX SAMPLE  METER READING/SCALE
 NOX SAMPLE  PPM
 NOX BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
 NOX BACKGRD PPM
 HC  CONCENTRATION PPM
 CO  CONCENTRATION PPM
 C02 CONCENTRATION ?CT
 NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
 302 COCENTRATION PPM
 HC  MASS  (GRAMS)
 CO  MASS  (GRAMS)
 C02 MASS  (GRAMS)
 NOX MASS  (GRAMS)
 SO? MASS  (GRAMS)
HC  GRAMS/KILOMETRE       .88
CO  GRAMS/KILOMETRE     H.1S
C02 GRAMS/KILOMETRE   28b
NOX GPAMS/KILOMETRE     -*.0b
S02 GKAMS/hlLOMETRE     0.00

HC  GRAMS/KG OF FUEL   S.2b
CO  GRAMS/KG OF FUEL   8b.2
COP GRAMS/KG OF FUEL   3005
NOX GRAMS/KG OF FUEL  42.73
SO? GRAMS/KG OF FUEL   0.00
                                              23.0/3
                                               230
                                                .8/3
                                                 8
                                              HH.7/3
                                              1087
                                               0.0/3
                                                 0
                                              5U.f>/2
                                              2.32
                                               l.H/2
                                               .05
                                              3b.2/H
                                             3b2.0
                                               223
                                              1030
                                              3.28
                                             3bl.2
                                              0.0
                                             17.55
                                            Ib3.3b
                                           5b9S.87
                                             81.00
                                              0.00
                              HC  GRAMS/MIN   J.lb
                              CO  GRAMS/MIN   10.8
                              C02 GRAMS/MIN    377
                              NOX GRAMS/MIN   5.3b
                              S02 GRAMS/MIN   0.00
CARBON BALANCE FUEL ECONOMY =   12.93 LITRES PER HUNDRED KILOMETERS

-------
UNIT NO.    fl
VEHICLE MOOFL
                      TEST  NO.  i
               PLYMOUTH  SALON
TAHLE                   VEHICLE EMISSION  RFSULT.S
                1175  LIGHT DUTY EMISSIONS  TEST
          DATF  R/J7/77                      MFf,R.  CODE
          ENGINF   5.10 LITRE B              CURB  WT.
                                                                                              -n
                                                                                              0  KG
YR.
GVM
          KG
R F L .
     F TFR 7*?.q5 MM OF  HG.
     iiLH TFHP.   ?s.n OFT,,  c
     HUMIDITY     b n P c T .
    EXHAUST EMISSIONS


         BLOWER OIF. P R (• S S . i
         RAT, RESULTS
W
I
                          G? ,
                                    MM.  H ? 0
RAG NO.
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
HC SAMPLF METER
HC SAMPLE PPM
HC RACKGRD METER
HC RACKGRD PPM
CO SAMPLE MFTFR
CO SAMPLE PPM
co BACKGRO MFTFD
CO BACK G 40 PPM
co? SAMPLF METER


READING/SCALE

READING/SCALE

READING/SCALE

RFADING/SCALE

READING/SCALE
CO? SAMPLK PERCENT
co? RACKGRO MFTER
READING/SCALE
CO? HACKGRO PERCENT
NOX SAMPLE METER
NOX SAMPLE PPM
NOX HACKGHD MFTFR
NOX 8ACKGRD PPM
SO? SAMPLE METFR
90? SAMPLE PPM
SO? BACKGRD METER
SO? RACKGRD PPM
HC CONCENTRATION
CO CONCENTRATION
CO? CONCENTRATION
NOX CONCENTRATION
SO? CONCENTRATION
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
TO? MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
SO? MASS GRAMS
WEIGHTED MASS HC
WEIGHTED MASS CO
WEIGHTED MASS C02
WEIGHTED MASS NOX
WEIGHTED MASS S02
HEADING/SCALE

READING/SCALE

READING/SCALE

READING/SCALE

PPM
PPM
PCT
PPM
PPM

]
?;


.2b GRAMS/KILOMETRE
f.HS GRAMS/KILOMETRE
3in.iR GRAMS/KILOMETRE
.S3 GRAMS/KILOMETRE
n. OH GRAMS/KILOMETRE
1
f D71H
13.5/3
135
1.5/3
15
55.0/3
1370
.3/3
h
88.0/3
1 . ht
t.t/3
.07
27.7/2
27.7
3.1/2
3.1
-M. n/*
-n.o
-n.n/*
-o.o
122
1215
1.58
25.0
0.0
5.3b
Lit ,S2
?01.b7
3.81
o.nn





                                                                       WET 8UL8 TEMP   19.4  DF.G.  C
                                                                        4BS. HUMIDITY   i?..i  GRAMS/KG
                                                                       BLOWER INLET PRESS.,  Gl  73b.h  nM.  H20
                                                                       BLOWER INLET TEMP.    H3  PEG.  C
                                                                   18. 3/2
                                                                     18
                                                                    1.5/3
                                                                     15
                                                                   11. 2/*
                                                                     1 1
                                                                     .2/3
                                                                   1.15
                                                                    H.5/3
                                                                    .07
                                                                   13. O/?
                                                                   13.0
                                                                    1.9/2
                                                                    1.1
                                                                   -n.n/*
                                                                   -O.o
                                                                   -O.O/*
                                                                   -n.o

                                                                      5
                                                                      b
                                                                   1.08
                                                                   11.3
                                                                    0.0
                                                                    .35
                                                                    *1b
                                                                2511.12
                                                                   2. 11*
                                                                   0.00
                                                                                     3P. I/?
                                                                                       32
                                                                                     I1*. 5/2
                                                                                    70.
                                                                                       71
                                                                                     2.3/»
                                                                                       ?
                                                                                    H3.0/3
                                                                                    1.53
                                                                                      .07
                                                                                    22.7/2
                                                                                    22.7
                                                                                      1 .7/2
                                                                                      1.7
                                                                                    -n.o/*
                                                                                    -o.o
                                                                                    -o.o/*
                                                                                    -n.o

                                                                                       11
                                                                                       bb
                                                                                    i.f?
                                                                                    21.2
                                                                                      0.0
                                                                                      .8f
                                                                                    5.82
                                                                                 2050.51
                                                                                    3.23
                                                                                    0.00
  CARBON  BALANCE FUEL CONSUMPTION =  17.0(1  LITRES  PER HUNDRED KILOMETRES
  TOTAL CVS FLOW =   2R?.7 STD. CU.  METRFS

-------
                                  TABLE
                                               EXHAUST EMISSIONS FROM SINGLE BAG SAMPLE
                                                     VEHICLE NUMBER   8
M
                           DATE  8/17/77              TIME    -fl HRS.
                           MODEL  1977 PLYMOUTH/SALON SET-7
                           DRIVER   SR                TE3T WT.  2041 KG.
                           WET BULB TEMP  18 C        DRY BULB TEMP  2b C
                           SPEC. HUM.    9.7 GRAM/KG   8ARO.  7t2.2 MM  HG.
                                                  TEST NO.  2
                                                  ENGINE 5.9 LITREV 8
                                                  GVW    0 KG
                                                  REL. HUM.  Hb.3 PCT
                                                  MEASURED FUEL  n.on KG
                             PUN DURATION
                             BLOWER INLET PRESS.
                             BLOWER DIP.   PRESS.
                             BLOWER INLET TEMP.
                             DYNO REVOLUTIONS
                             BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
                             BLOWER cu.  CM /REV.
                       23.28 MINUTE3
                      73b.b  MM. H20
                      73b.b  MM  H20
                         43  DEC. C
                      320b9
                       112305
                       2228
                                          METER READING/SCALE
                                          PPM
                                  BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
                                  BACKGRD PPM
                                  SAMPLE  METER READING/SCALE
                                  SAMPLE  PPM
                                  BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
  BAG RESULTS
   HC  SAMPLE
   HC  SAMPLE
   HC
   HC
   CO
   CO
   CO
   CO  BACKGRD PPM
   C02 SAMPLE  METER READING/SCALE
   C02 SAMPLE  PERCENT
   C02 BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
   C02 BACKGRD PERCENT
               METER READING/SCALE
               PPM
   NOX BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
   NOX BACKGRO PPM
   HC  CONCENTRATION PPM
   CO  CONCENTRATION PPM
   C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
   NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
   S02 COCENTRATION PPM
       MASS (GRAMS)
       MASS (GRAMS)
                              NOX SAMPLE
                              NOX SAMPLE
                              HC
                              CO
   COS MASS (GRAMS)
   NOX MASS (GRAMS)
   302 MASS (GRAMS)

HC  GRAMS/KILOMETRE
co  GRAMS/KILOMETRE
co? GRAMS/KILOMETRE
NOX GRAMS/KILOMETRE
SO? GRAMS/KILOMETRE
                                                   3.2b
                                                 soa
                                                    .12
                                                   0.00
   tO.b/2
     11
   18,7/2
     19
   72. I/*
    317
                                                                          13
                                                                        95.3/3
                                                                        1.71
    .Ob
    B.0/2
    8.0
    1.7/2
    1.7
     2H
    290
   1.74
    b.5
   0.0
   2.9b
  70.90
bb95.37
   2.53
   o.no
                           HC   GRAMS/KG OF FUEL   1.38
                           co   GRAMS/KG OF FUEL   33. o
                           co?  GRAMS/KG OF FUEL   3113
                           NOX  GRAMS/KG OF FUEL   l.lfl
                           SO?  GRAMS/KG OF FUEL   0.00
                                HC  GRAMS/MIN    .13
                                CO  GRAMS/MIN    3.0
                                C02 GRAMS/MIN    ?8R
                                NOX GRAMS/MIN    .11
                                302 GRAMS/MIN   0.00
                           CARBON BALANCE FUEL ECONOMY =   13.HO  LITRES  PER  HUNDRED  KILOMETERS

-------
                                 TABLE
                    FXHAUST EMISSIONS FROM  SINGLE  R*G  SAMPLE
                          VEHICLE NUMBER    8
W
 I
00
                          DATE  8/17/77               TIME     -0  MRS.         TEST  NO.   2
                          MODEL  1977 PLYMOUTH/SALON  SFT-7                   ENGINE  5.9 LITREfl
                          RUN DURATION   23. PB MIN.   DISTANCE  DRIVEN   21.7>»  KILOMETRES
                          CVR 9LOWFR TEST VOL.  25H.2H  ACT. CD.  METRES
                           SAMPLE
SUl.FATE DATA               	

 FILTER NO.              H7FH-2858
 SAMPLE VOL. CU. FT.        13.b8
 SAMPLE TEMP. DEC. F           RO
 SAMPLE AREA SO. IN.     55028.00
 DILUTION FACTOR                 1
 STAND. DEN. MICROG/ML       5.no
 STAND. AREA SO. IN.    115891,.00
 30>»,MICROG/FILTER         l>».0fs

SULFUR DIOXIDE DATA

 SAMPLE VOL. CU. FT.         1.00
 SAMPLE TEMP. DEC. F           70
 AREA,BUBBLER 1              O.OD
 OIL. FACT.,BUBBLER 1            1
 AREA,BUBBLER 2              0.00
 OIL. FACT.,BUBBLER 2            1
 STAND. DEN. MICROG/ML       1.00
 STAND. AREA,SO. IN.         1.00
 302, MILLIG/BUBBLER 1      n.OOO
 SO?, MILLIG/BUBBLER 2      0.000
 302, PPM                     0.0

SULFATE AND 302 EMISSIONS

 NET SULFATE,MILLIGRAM/TEST
 NFT H2SO»,MILLIGRAM/TEST
 NET 302,GRAM/TEST
 NET SULFATE,MILLIGRAM/KILOMETRE
 NET H2SOH,MILLIGRAM/KILOMETRE
 NET 302,GRAM/KILOMETRE
                                                                 10.330
                                                                 10.5»7
                                                                 0.000
                                                                   .175
                                                                             BACKGROUND
                                                                                 1 .00
                                                                                   70
                                                                                 o.nn
                                                                                    i
                                                                                 1 .no
                                                                                 i .00
                                                                                o.ono
       i .no
         70
       o.oo
          i
       o.no
          i
       1.00
       i.no
      o.ooo
      o.ooo
        o.o
                                                                 0.000
                          SULFUR BALANCE
                           FUEL WT., 2151 GRAMS
                                     SULFUR,GRAM3
                                     PCT. RECOVERY
                          SULFUR IN FUEL, ,030n PCT.
                           FUEL     - 302       H2S04
                                    0.000
                                     o.oo
,003t
  .53
302 + H2SOH

    .003H
      .53

-------
                                TABLE
                                             FXHAUST  EMISSIONS  FROM  SINGLE  BAG  SAMPLE
                                                   VEHICLE  NUMBER    8
H
                        DATE   8/17/77               TIME     -0  MRS.
                        MODEL   1177 PLYMOUTH/SALON  FFT
                        DRIVER    SR                 TEST  WT.  ?rm  KG.
                        WET BULB  TEMP   18  C         DRY BULB  TEMP   2h  C
                        SPEC.  HUM;   l.t GRAM/KG    BARO.   7t2.2 MM   HG.

                          RUN  DURATION          12.78  MINUTES
                          BLOWER  INLET  PRESS.  73b.b   MM.  H20
                          BLOWER  DIF.   PRESS.  73b.b   MM   H20
                          BLOWER  INLET  TEMP.      f3   DEC.  C
                          DYNO  REVOLUTIONS    2>*211
                          BLOWER  REVOLUTIONS     b!735
                          BLOWER  CU. CM /REV.   2228
                                                TEST NO.  3
                                                ENGINE 5.1 LITREV fl
                                                GVW    0 KG
                                                REL. HUM.  i»3.7 PCT
                                                MEASURED FUEL  n.on KG
                                        METER  READING/SCALE
                                        PPM
                                BACKGRD  METER  READING/SCALE
                                BACKGRD  PPM
                                SAMPLE   METER  READING/SCALE
                                SAMPLE   PPM
                                BACKGRD  METER  RFADING/SCALE
BAG RESULTS
 HC  SAMPLE
 HC  SAMPLE
 HC
 HC
 CO
 CO
 CO
 CO  BACKGRD PPM
 CO? SAMPLE  METER READING/SCALE
 CO? SAMPLE  PERCENT
 CO? BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
 CO? BACKGRO PERCENT
 NOX SAMPLE  METER READING/SCALE
 NOX SAMPLE  PPM
 NOX BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
 NOX BACKGRD PPM
     CONCENTRATION PPM
     CONCENTRATION PPM
 COS CONCENTRATION PCT
 NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
 SO? COCENTRATION PPM
     MASS (GRAMS)
     MASS (GRAMS)
                            HC
                            CO
                            HC
                            CO
                            CO?  MASS  (GRAMS)
                            NOX  MASS  (GRAMS)
                            S02  MASS  (GRAMS)

                        HC   GRAMS/KILOMETRE       .If
                        CO   GRAMS/KILOMETRE      3.13
                        CO?  GRAMS/KILOMETRE    273
                        NOX  GRAMS/KILOMETRE       .11
                        302  GRAMS/KILOMETRE      0.00

                        HC   GRAMS/KG OF FUEL    I.h3
                        co   GRAMS/KG OF FUEL    35.b
                        CO?  GRAMS/KG OF FUEL    3108
                        NOX  GRAMS/KG OF FUEL    1.29
                        SO?  GRAMS/KG OF FUEL    0.00
 51. 1/2
   51
 18.B/2
   11
 87. b/*
  b.?/*
   21
 *8.3/2
 2.11
  2.1/2
  .OR
 10.4/2
 10. »
  1.1/2
  1.1
   35
  38*
 2.1?
  8.8
 0.0
 2.3b
51.57
                                           1.87
                                           0.00
                              HC  GRAMS/MIN    .18
                              CO  GRAMS/MIN    f.O
                              C02 GRAMS/MIN    352
                              NOX GRAMS/MIN    .15
                              302 GRAMS/MIN   0.00
                        CARBON BALANCE FUEL ECONOMY =   11.11 LITRES PER HUNDRED KILOMETERS

-------
                                   TAHLF.
   UNIT  >in.
   VFHICI F
      TEST NO.  1
PLY FURY
   HAROMFIFR  719 . '
   DRY BIIL«  TFMP.
   REl.  HUMIDITY

   EXHAUST  EMISSIONS
  MM OF HG.
  22.H OFG. C
   fcS PCT.
                VEHICLF  EMISSION  RESULTS
              LIGHT DUTY  EMISSIONS  TEST
  OATE  9/23/77                      MFGR.  CODE   -n
  ENGINE   5.90 LITRE  8              CURB WT.     0 KG

                                WET  BULB TEMP  18.3 DEC. C
                                 A8S.  HUMIDITY  11. b GRAMS/KG
VR.
GVM
1977
   U KG
W
I
         HLOWER  OIF.  PRFSS.,  G?, bHS.R MM.
         RAG  RESULTS
H20
WAG NO.
HI. HWER REVOLUTIONS
HC SAMPLE MFTFR WFAI) I NG/SC ALE
HC SAMPLE PPM
HC RACKGRD MFTFR READING/SCALE
HC HACKGRD PPM
CO SAMPLE MFTFR Rf ADING/3CALE
TO SAMPLF PPM
m HACKGRD MFTER RFAD I NG/3C ALE
TO riACKGRD PPM
rn? SAMPLE METER READING/SCALE
CO? SAMPLE PERCENT
CO? BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
CD? BACKGRD PERCENT
NOX SAMPLE MFTER REAPING/SCALE
NflX SAMPLE PPM
NfiX flACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
NOX HACKGRD PPM
SO? SAMPLE MFTFR READING/SCALE
SO? .SAMPLE PPM
SO? HACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
SO? BACKGRD PPM
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
CO? CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
SO? CONCENTRATION PPM
HC. MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
1
•HI794
90.7/3
91
11.0/2
11
28.2/3
bhl
.1/3
2
91.3/3
1.71
t.1/3
.fib
30.5/2
311.5
1.2/2
1.2
-O.O/*
-n.o
-0. O/*
-0.0
Bl
b?»
l.hS
29.5
o.n
3.5S
55.53
CO? MASS GRAMS ?321.Ht
NOX MASS GRAMS
SO? MASS GRAMS
WEIGHTED MASS HC .20 GRAMS/KILOMETRE
WEIGHTED MASS CO 3.25 GRAMS/KILOMETRE
WEIGHTED MASS CO? Hflf.H? GRAMS/K ILOMETRF
WEIGHTED MASS NDX .31 GRAMS/KILOMETRE
WEIGHTED MASS S02 t'.OO GRAMS/K I LOMETRF
4.f 1
n.oo





                                                        BLOWER INLET PRESS.,  Gl  b85.8 MM.  H20
                                                        BLOWER INLET TF.MP.    43  DEG.  C
                                                                      b9857
                                                                       15. 1/?
                                                                         15
                                                                       1M.4/2
                                                                         10
                             3.8/*
                               H
                            b5.ll/3
                            l.lb
                             f .0/3
                             .lib
                             H.3/2
                             H.3
                             1.1/2
                             1 .1
                            -o.n/*
                            -o.o
                            -o.o/*
                            -o.n

                               t
                              id
                            l.ll
                             3.3
                             0.0
                             .»?
                            b.ll
                        ?bb5. 13
                             .85
                            0.00
                                                                                          3
                                                                                       40737
                                                                      10.B/2
                                                                        11
                                                                      83.U/*
                                                                       194
                                                                       1.3/*
                                                                         2
                                                                      85.1/3
                                                                      1.58
                                                                       f .0/3
                                                                       .fib
                                                                      18.8
                                                                       1.0/2
                                                                       1.0
                                                                      -O.O/*
                                                                      -0.0
                                                                      -O.O/*
                                                                      -0.0

                                                                        17
                                                                       1B2
                                                                      1.52
                                                                      11.3
                                                                       o.n
                                                                       .75
                                                                    Ih.lH
                                                                  213b.OB
                                                                      1.70
                                                                      0.00
        FUEL ECONOMY BY CARRON  BALANCE =   5.7  KILOMETRE/LITRE

-------
UNIT NO.  335
VEHICLE MODEL
PLY.
           TABLE                   VEHICLE EMISSION RESULTS
                           1975  LIGHT DUTY EMISSIONS TEST
 TEST NO. *          DATE  9/28/77                     MFGR. CODE
FURY                 ENGINE   5.90 LITRE 8             CURB WT.
                                                                                         -0
                                                                                         0 KG
YR.  1S7?
GVM     0 KG
BAROMETER 739.90 MM OF HG.
DRY BULB TEMP.   22.8 DEG. C
REL. HUMIDITY     b9 PCT.

EXHAUST EMISSIONS

     BLOWER DIP. PRESS., 62, b88.3 MM.
     BAG RESULTS
     BAG NO.
     BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
                                       H20
HC SAMPLE METER READING/SCALE
HC SAMPLE PPM
HC BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
HC BACKGRD PPM
CO SAMPLE METER READING/SCALE
CO SAMPLE PPM
CO BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
CO BACKGRD PPM
C02 SAMPLE METER READING/SCALE
C02 SAMPLE PERCENT
C02 BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
C02 BACKGRD PERCENT
NOX SAMPLE METER READING/SCALE
NOX SAMPLE PPM
NOX BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
NOX BACKGRD PPM
S02 SAMPLE METER READING/SCALE
302 SAMPLE PPM
S02 BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
302 BACKGRD PPM
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
S02 CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
9.8/3
98
1.9/3
19
32.3/3
7b5
.1/3
2
90.9/3
1.70
3.7/3
.Ob
51.1/2
51.1
.7/2
.7
-O.O/*
-0.0
-O.O/*
-o.n
82
721
l.bS
50.5
0.0
3.58
b3.97
C02 MASS GRAMS 2310.09
NOX MASS GRAMS
302 MASS GRAMS
WEIGHTED MASS HC .lb GRAMS/KILOMETRE
WEIGHTED MASS CO 2.3b GRAMS/KILOMETRE
WEIGHTED MASS C02 399.28 GRAMS/KILOMETRE
WEIGHTED MASS NOX 1.39 GRAMS/KILOMETRE
WEIGHTED MASS 302 0.00 GRAMS/KILOMETRE
7.78
0.00





                                                                       WET  BULB  TEMP   18.9  DEG.  C
                                                                        ABS. HUMIDITY   12.3  GRAMS/KG
                                                       BLOWER INLET PRESS., 61 b9U.9 MM. H20
                                                       BLOWER INLET TEMP.   H3 DEG. C
                                                                    2
                                                                  b9813
                                                                   lS.b/2
                                                                    lb
                                                                    b.9/*
                                                                      7
                                                                    3.0/*
                                                                      3
                                                                   b3.5/3
                                                                   1.13
                                                                    3.3/3
                                                                    .05
                                                                   17.Y/2
                                                                   17. H
                                                                     .b/2
                                                                     .b
                                                                   -O.O/*
                                                                   -0.0
                                                                   -O.O/*
                                                                   -0.0

                                                                      3
                                                                      t
                                                                   1.09
                                                                   lb.9
                                                                    0.0
                                                                    .21
                                                                    .57
                                                               2blS.20
                                                                   •Ktb
                                                                   0.00
                                                                      3
                                                                   10b31
                                                                    IB. 1/2
                                                                      18
                                                                    13.b/2
                                                                      It
                                                                    11.7/*
                                                                      11
                                                                     2.1*/*
                                                                       2
                                                                    B».t/3
                                                                    l.Sb
                                                                     .05
                                                                    3*. 3/3
                                                                   102.9
                                                                      .3/3
                                                                      .9
                                                                    -O.O/*
                                                                    -0.0
                                                                    -O.O/*
                                                                    -0.0

                                                                       b
                                                                       8
                                                                    1.52
                                                                   102.1
                                                                     0.0
                                                                     .27
                                                                     .7H
                                                                 2122.38
                                                                   15.73
                                                                    0.00
     FUEL ECONOMY BY CARBON BALANCE =   5.8  KILOMETRE/LITRE

-------
w
I
       UNIT Ml).     8
       Vf HICl F MUOEL
          TEST  NO.
           PLYMOUTH
                            TAHLE                   VFHICLE EMISSION  RESULT3
                                                197H  LIGHT DUTY  EMISSIONS TEST
                                          ACTUAL DISTANCES USED  IN CALCULATIONS
                               1       DATE 111/20/77                      MFGR.  CODE
                                      ENGINE   5.10 LITRE 8              CURB «T.
-0                  YR.
0 KG                GVM
                                                                                                   1S7 7
                                                                                                      U Mi
       HARflMFTFW  74(1.bh  MM OF HP,.
       OHY rtHl H TFMP.    ?s.H HER. -C
       MKL . HiJMIDI TY      41 DC1 .
       EXHAUST FMJSSIONS
       DIP.
RA(, RESULTS
HAT, NO.
HLUWER REVOI
HC   SAMPLE
HC   SAMPLE
HC
HC
TU
TO
CD
CO
COP
CO?
C02
C02
NOX
NOX
NOX
NOX
302
SO?
S02
.SOP
                                 G?f b85.8 MM. H2H
SAMPLE
SAMPLE
BACKGRO
HACKGRD
SAMPLE
SAMPLE
HACKGRD
BACKGRO
SAMPLE
SAMPLE
BACKGRD
BACKGRO
SAMPLE
SAMPLE
HACKGRD
flACKGRIJ
IITIONS
 IF TER READING/SCALE
 PPM
 MtTF.R READING/SCALE
 PPM
 METER READING/SCALE
 PPM
 MFTER READING/SCALE
 PPM
 METKR READING/SCALE
 PERCENT
 METEK READING/SCALE
 PERCENT
 METER READING/SCALE
 PPM
 METER READING/SCALE
 PPM
 METER READING/SCALE
 PPM
 METER READING/SCALE
 PPM
            HC   CONCENTRATION  PPM
            CO   CONCENTRATION  PPM
            C02  CONCENTRATION  PCT
            NOX  CONCENTRATION  PPM
            S02  CONCENTRATION  PPM
            HC   MASS GRAMS
            TO   MASS GRAMS
            C02  MASS GRAMS
            NOX  MASS I;RAMS
            S02  MASS G9AMS
            HC GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
            CO GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILK)
            C02 GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MlLF)
            NOX GHAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
            FUEL CONSUMPTION KY CB  L/10MKM (MPG)
            cvs FLO*. STD.  Cii. METRES  CSCFI
            CALCULATED DISTANCE KM(IIILES)
     NEIGHTFD  FOf-.l.  CONSUMPTION L I T RF S/ I ilOKM (MPT,)
     WEIGHTED  MASS  HC GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
     HEIGHTFD  MASS  CO GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
     HEIGHTFO  MASS  COS GRAMS/KM  (GRAMS/MILE)
     WEIGHTED  M»SS  NOX KRAMS/KH  ( GR A MS/ •< ILE 1
          ini»c CV3  FLU* =    ?B1.<»  "JTO.  CU. MET!»FS
                                                                   BULB  TEMP  17.8 DEC. C
                                                                ArfS.  HUMIDITY    9.9 GRAMS/KG
                                                                COMMENTS  1178 FTP-C
                                                              SLOWER  INLET  PRESS., GI hHS.s  MM.  H?O
                                                              SLOWER  INLET  TEMP.   43 DEG. c
1
4 n 7 't ?
in.3/ 3
103
2.2/ 3
22
32. 4/ 3
7b7
.4/ 3
s
10. 5/ 3
l.bl
3.2/ 3
.05
2b.o/ 2
2b.O
.5/ 3
.5
-M.O/-0
-0.0
-0.0/-0
-0.0
8*
753
l.bS
25. b
0.0
3.70
b4.34
2304. b2
3.b4
11.00
.b4 ( I.
11. OS ( 17.
317. [12 Cb38.
.b3 ( ) .
17.77 ( 13.
7b.S (27011
5.80 ( 3.
17.72
.20
3.53
4l>q. 10
.33
2
bISlh
2H.8/ 2
25
20. I/ 2
20
71 .7/13
7(1
10.b/13
10
bb. I/ 3
1.11
3.7/ 3
.Ob
3.S/ 2
3.5
.5/ 2
.5
-0.0/-0
-0.0
-0.0/-0
-0.0
b
58
1.13
3.0
0.0
.49
8.81
2718. ?b
.74
0.00
03) .08 ( .13)
83) 1.42 ( 2.28)
HI) 433.57 (b17.b2)
01) .12 ( .11)
23) 18. bl C 12. bf)
.0) 131.0 (4b2b.l)
bl) b.27 ( 3.10)
( 13.27)
( .32)
( S.faB)
(bS8.24)
C .54)
3
40701
28. 2/ 2
28
lb.0/ 2
Ib
58.3/12
130
2.7/12
5
85. b/ 3
1.51
3. 1/ 3
.Ob
22. I/ 2
22.1
l.O/ 2
1.0
-0.0/-0
-0.0
-0.0/-0
-0.0
14
120
1.53
21.2
n.o
.b2
10. bS
2145.03
3.02
0.00
.11 (
1.85 ( 2.
371. b4 (517.
.52 (
lb.00 ( 14.
7b.4 (2b17
5.77 ( 3.





































17)
17)
17)
84)
70)
.8)
51)






-------
       UNIT NO.   t MH
       VEHICLE MODEL
           NO.  J
FURY PLYMOUTH
       bAROMFTFR  73H.M1  MM  (IF HG.
       DRY RULH  TEMP.    ?•».•»  OEG.  c
       REL. HUMIDITY      35 PCT.

       EXHAUST EMISSIONS

            BLOWER  DIP.  PRtSS.,  ('?, hSll.H MM. HPO
            RAG  RhSULlS
            RAG  NC.
            RLOWfcR  KtVULUUUNS
                               VEHICLE  EMISSION RESULTS
                       )97s   LIGHT  DUTY EMISSIONS TEST
                OATF. 11/5R/77                      MFGR. CODE   -0
                ENGINE   5.90  LITRE  B              CURB WT.     0 KG

                                              WET BULB TEMP  15.0 DEG.  C
                                               ABS. HUMIDITY   b.9 GRAMS/KG
                                             YR.
                                             GVH
                                 1977
                                    U KG
M
HC
HC
HC
HC
f.Ll
CO
CO
CO
cop
CO?
cu?
COP
NOX
NOX
NOX
NOX
SO?
S02
SOP
SO?
HC
CO
CO?
NOX
SO?
HC
co
CU2
NOX
SO?
SAC.PLt MhTfR
r.Aft'Lt PPM
(sACKURp MhTEH
f'ACKGRl; PPM
SAKPLE MF.TtP
SAMPLE PPM
BALKGRD MF.TER
HACKGKD PPM
SAhPLt MFTER
HEADING/SCALE

Rf ADING/SCALE

READING/SCALE

KEAD tNG/SCALE
(
READING/SCALE
SAKPLE PERCENT
OACKliRD MhTEH
READING/SCALE
BACKGRD PERCENT
SAMPLE MFTFR
SAMPLE PPM
bACKGRO MFTtR
RACKGKO PPM
SAKPLE METER
SAMPLE PPM
BACKGRD MF.TFR
BACKGRD PPM
CONCENTRATION
CONCENTRATION
CONCENTRATION
CONCENTRATION
CONCENTRATION
MASS GRAMS
MASS GRAMS
MASS GRAMS
MASS GRAMS
MASS GRAMS
READING/SCALE

READING/SCALE

READING/3CALE

RfcAOING/SCALE

PPM
PPM
PCT
PPM
PPM





                           1
                       M- H 7 9 1
                         9.8/3
                           98
                         l.D/3
                           111
                        30.9/3
                         723
                           .2/3
                            5
                        B9.H/3
                        I.h7
                         3.8/3
                         .Ob
                        H2.8/2
                        H2.8
                                                            .t
                                                          -n.u/*
                                                          -II. 0
                                                          -o.n/*
                                                          -o.o

                                                            89
                                                          l.bl
                                                          42.5
                                                           0.0
                                                          3.91
                                                         b 1 . 3 7
                                                       227t.be
                                                          5. S3
                                                          n.nu
             WEIGHTED MASS MC
             WEIGHTED MASS CO
             WEIGHTED MASS co2
             WEIGHTF.D MASS NOX
             WEIGHTED MASS 502
   . I b GRAMS/KILOMETRE
  P.hi GkAMS/KlLOMETRE
399.nl GRAMS/KILOMETRE
   .58 GRAMS/KILOMETRE
  11.01" GKAMS/KILOMETRE
                                              BLOWER INLET PRESS., Gl  bbO.H  MM.  H20
                                              BLOWER INLET TEMP.   H2  DEG.  C
     Z
  b9742
   13.2/2
     13
   12.8/2
     13
   2b.3/*
     25
    3.9/*
      t
   bS.1/3
   l.lb
    3.9/3
    .Ob
    8.b/2
    8.b
     .5/2
     .5
   -O.O/*
   -0.0
   -O.O/*
   -0.0

      2
     21
   1.11
    B.I
    0.0
    .11
   3.15
2b73.b2
   1.81
   0.00
     3
  H0731
   15.1/2
     15
   13.9/2
     If
     H5
    3.7/*
      t
   82.2/3
   1.52
    t.7/3
    .07
   38.1/2
   38.1
     .7/2
     .7
   -O.O/*
   -0.0
   -O.O/*
   -0.0

      3
     HO
   1.H5
   37.5
    0.0
    .13
   3.53
20f0.99
   t.87
   0.00
            FUEL  ECONOMY  BY CAKHiiN BALANCE =   5.8  KILOMETRF/LITRE

-------
                                  TAbLE
  UNIT NU.  F. MB
  VKHICLE MOOFL
           TEST NO.
     PLY FURY
bARflMRTER 719.9(1 MM OF HG.
DHY BlILU TEMP.   23.3 DEG. C
HEL. HUMIDITY     bb PCT.

EXHAUST EMISSIONS

     BLOWER DIP. PRESS. , 62, b?3.1 MM.
     PAG RESULTS
     HAG NO.
     PLOHER REVOLUTIONS
     HC
     HC
     HC
     HC
     ro
     CO
     CO
     CO
          SAMPLE  METER READING/SCALE
          SAMPLE  PERCENT
          BACKGRO METER READING/SCALE
          BACKGRO PERCENT
          SAMPLE  METER READING/SCALE
                  PPM
w
              VEHICLE EMISSION RESULTS
      1975  LIGHT DUTY EMISSIONS TEST
PATE 12/13/77                     MFGR. CODE   -0                 YH.
ENGINE   5.90 LITRE B             CURB WT.     U KG               GVM

                             WET BULB TEMP  18.9 DtG. C
                              ABS. HUMIDITY  12.1 GRAMS/KG
                                                                        BLOWER  INLET PRESS.,  Gl  b73.1  MM.  H20
                                                                        BLOWER  INLET TEMP.    <*3  DEC. c
                                                                                                                 197?
                                                                                                                    U
                    MtTER READING/SCALE
                    PPM
SAMPLE
SAMPLE
BACKGRO METfR READING/SCALE
BACKGRD PPM
SAMPLE  METER READING/SCALE
SAMPLE  PPM
BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
HACKGHD PPM
C02
C02
C02
C02
NOX
NOX
NOX
NOX
302
302
302
302

HC
CO
C02
NOX
302
HC
CO
C02
NOX
302
SAMPLE
BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
BACKGRO PPM
SAMPLE
SAMPLE
                    METER READING/SCALE
                    PPM
            BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
            BACKGRD PPM

            CONCENTRATION PPM
            CONCENTRATION PPM
            CONCENTRATION PCT
            CONCENTRATION PPM
            CONCENTRATION PPM
            MASS GRAMS
            MASS GRAMS
            MASS GRAMS
            MASS GRAMS
            MASS GRAMS
        12.1/3
         121
          .9/3
           9
        27.H/3
         b37
          .1/3
           Z
                                                   1.77
         .Ob
        2b.5/2
        2b.S
         1.8/2
         1.8
        -n.O/*
        -0.0
        -O.O/*
        -0.0

         113
         bOO
        1.71
        2f.9
         0.0
        5.00
       53.51
     2"U0.19
        3.83
        0.00
       WEIGHTED  MASS HC
       WEIGHTED  MASS co
       WEIGHTED  MASS C02
       WEIGHTED  MASS NOX
       WEIGHTED  MASS S02
                  .20 GRAMS/KILOMETRE
                 2.18 GRAMS/KILOMETRE
               lll.lb GRAMS/KILOMETRE
                  .-»S GRAMS/KILOMETRE
                 0.00 GRAMS/KILOMETRE
     2
  h9908
    9.5/2
     1U
    8.3/2
      8
   lb.3/*
     Ib
    •KO/*
      H
   b5.2/3
   1.17
    3.b/3
    .Ob
    b.3/2
    b.3
    1.9/2
    1.9
   -0.lt/*
   -o.n
   -o.n/*
   -o.o

      2
     11
   1.12
    * .b
    o.u
    .15
   1.75
2b98.13
   1.20
   o.on
     3
  HObOl
   It. 5/2
     1*
    8.8/2
      9
   3b.8/*
     35
   85.5/3
   1.58
    3.7/3
    .Ob
   30.8/2
   30.8
    1.8/2
    1.8
   -O.O/*
   -0.0
   -O.O/*
   -0.0

      7
     29
   1.53
   29.2
    0.0
    .30
   2.b2
2152.90
   t.47
   0.00
       FUEL  ECONOMY  BY  CARBON BALANCE =   S.b  KILOMETRE/LITRE

-------
                                   TABLE
    UNIT  NO.   235
    VEHICLE MODEL
      TEST NO.
FURY EM 8
              VEHICLE EMISSION RESULTS
      1975  LIGHT DUTY EMISSIONS TEST
DATE 12/lb/77                     MFGR. CODE
ENGINE   5.90 LITRE 8             CURB HT.
-0
0 KG
YR.  197?
GVM     0 KG
    BAROMETER 734.31 MM OF HG.
    DRY  dULB TEMP.    35.0 DEG. C
    REL.  HUMIDITY     53 PCT.

    EXHAUST EMISSIONS

         BLOWER DIF. PRESS., G?, bbll.4 MM.
         RAG RESULTS
I
M
Ul
                        H20
RAG NO.
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
HC SAMPLE METER
HC SAMPLE PPM
HC BACKGRD METER
HC BACKGRD PPM
CO SAMPLE METER
CO SAMPLE PPM
CO BACKGHD METER
CO BACKGRD PPM
C02 SAMPLE METER


HEADING/SCALE

READING/SCALE

HEADING/SCALE

READING/SCALE

READING/SCALE
CO? SAMPLE PERCENT
CO? BACKGRD METER
READING/SCALE
C02 BACKGRD PERCENT
NOX SAMPLE METER
NOX SAMPLE PPM
NOX BACKGRD METER
NOX BACKGRO PPM
S02 SAMPLE METER
S02 SAMPLE PPM
S03 BACKGRD METER
SO? BACKGRO PPM
HC CONCENTRATION
CO CONCENTRATION
CO? CONCENTRATION
NOX CONCENTRATION
S02 CONCENTRATION
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
CO? MASS GRAMS
NUX MASS GRAMS
SO? MASS GRAMS
WEIGHTED MASS HC
WEIGHTED MASS CO
WEIGHTED MASS cos
WEIGHTED MASS NOX
WEIGHTED MASS SO?
READING/SCALE

READING/SCALE

READING/SCALE

READING/SCALE

PPM
PPM
PCT
PPM
PPM


1
40758
54.5/2
54
8.5/2
9
82. 4/*
384
i.nx*
3
44.2/2
1.9b
2.1/2
.08
30.9/2
30.9
1.0/2
1.0
-O.O/*
-0.0
-O.O/*
-0.0
47
3bO
1.90
30.0
0.0
2.08
31.93
2b55.43


.08 GRAMS/KILOMETRE
1.39 GftAMS/KILOMETRE
4tU.94 GRAMS/KILOMETRE
.54 GRAMS/KILOMETRE
0.00 GKAMS/KILOMETRE
4.38
tl.OO





                                                       WET BULB TEMP  18.3 DEC. C
                                                        AB3. HUMIDITY  10.8 GRAMS/KG
                             BLOWER INLET PRESS., Gl bbO.4 MM. H20
                             BLOWER INLET TEMP.   43 DEC. C
                                                     2
                                                  b9907
                                                    B.9/2
                                                      1
                                                    9.4/2
                                                      q
                                                   18.O/*
                                                     17
                                                    2.0/*
                                                      2
                                                   70.2/3
                                                   1.27
                                                    3.9/3
                                                    .Ob
                                                    7.7/2
                                                    7.7
                                                     .7/2
                                                     .7
                                                   -O.O/*
                                                   -0.0
                                                   -O.O/*
                                                   -0.0

                                                      0
                                                     15
                                                   1.21
                                                    7.1
                                                    0.0
                                                    .03
                                                   2.24
                                                2914.57
                                                   1.77
                                                   0.00
                                            3
                                         40733
                                          11.5/2
                                            11
                                           B.b/2
                                             9
                                          18.b/*
                                            18
                                           1.3/*
                                             1
                                          88.3/3
                                          I.b4
                                           4.2/3
                                           .Ob
                                          35.5/2
                                          35.5
                                            .8/2
                                            .8
                                          -O.O/*
                                          -0.0
                                          -O.O/*
                                          -0.0

                                             4
                                            Ib
                                          1.59
                                          34.8
                                           0.0
                                           .17
                                          1.40
                                       2216.58
                                          S.07
                                          0.00
         FUEL  ECONOMY  BY CARBON BALANCE =   5.3  KILOMETRE/LITRE

-------
                                 TABLE
  UN I T  NU.   P15
  VtHICLt  MW>EL
              TEST NO.
          FURY
                                            VEHICLE EMISSION RESULTS
                                         1 7H  LIGHT DUTY EMISSIONS TEST
                                   ACTUAL DISTANCES USED IN CALCULATIONS
                               DATE 12/19/77                     MFGR. CODE
                               ENGINE   5.90 LITRE 8             CURB WT.
-0
0 KG
YR.
GVM
1977
   U KG
  HAROMI-TF-.R  73R.b3  MM  OF  HG.
  UHY  HULH  TEMP.    2».H  OEG.  C
  WtL.  HUMIDITY      HS PCT.

  FXHAUST EMISSIONS

       BLOWER  OIF.  PRESS.,  G?,  bS5.3  MM.
       RAG  RESULTS
       BAG  NO.
       BLOWER  REVOLUTIONS
       HC
       HC
       HC
       HC
       CD
       CO
       r. o
       CO
       COS
       CO?
w
 I
                                  H?0
             METER READING/SCALE
             PPM
SAMPLE
SAKPLE
HACKGHD METER READING/SCALE
HACKGRO PPM
SAKPLE  METER READING/SCALE
SAKPLE  PPM
BACKGRO METER READING/SCALE
RACKGRO PPM
SAMPLE
SAMPLE
             MtTER READING/SCALE
             PERCENT
CO?
CU?
NOX
NOX
NOX
NOX
SO?
SO?
302
SO?
BACKGRO METER READING/SCALE
HACKGRO PERCENT
SAMPLE  METER READING/SCALE
SAMPLE  PPM
BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
HACKGRD PPM
            SAMPLE
            SAMPLE
        METER READING/SCALE
        PPM
            BACKGRD  METER  READING/SCALE
            BACKGRD  PPM
      HC   CONCENTRATION  PPM
      CO   CONCENTRATION  PPM
      CO?  CONCENTRATION  PCT
      NOX  CONCENTRATION  PPM
      SO?  CONCENTRATION  PPM
      HC   MASS GRAMS
      CO   MASS GRAMS
      CO?  MASS GRAMS
      NOX  MASS GRAMS
      SO?  MASS GRAMS
      HC GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
      CO GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
      CO? GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
      NOX GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILF.)
      FUEL CONSUMPTION BY CB  L/1HOKM  (MPG)
      CVS FLOW STD. CU. METRES  (SCF)
      CALCULATED DISTANCE KM(MlLES)
WEIGHTED FUEL CONSUMPTION LITRES/IUOKM  (MPG)
WEIGHTED MASS HC GRAMS/KM (GHAMS/MlLE)
WEIGHTED MASS CO GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
WEIGHTED MASS CO? GRAMS/KM  (GRAMS/MILE)
WEIGHTED MASS NOX GRAMS/KM  (GBAMS/MICE)
    TOTAL cvs FLOH =   anb.i  STO.  CD.  METRES
                                                                 WET BULB TEMP  lb.7 DEG. C
                                                                  ABS. HUMIDITY   8.8 GRAMS/KG
                                                                  COMMENTS  1978 FTP EM g
                                                            BLOWER INLET PRESS., Gl b55.3 MM. H?0
                                                            BLOWER INLET TEMP.   HI DEG. C
1
10791
80. 8/ 2
81
IB. I/ 2
18
23. 8/ 3
550
.!/ 3
?
95. 2/ 3
1.79
1.S/ 3
.07
17. 2/ 2
17.2
1.3/ 2
1.3
-0.0/-0
-0.0
-0.0/-0
-0.0
bS
522
1.73
lb.1
0.0
2.88
1b.71
2135.19
2.23
0.00
.50 (
8.08 ( 13.
121.01 (b?7.
.39 (
18.58 ( 12.
77.0 (2718
5.78 ( 3.
17.50
.09
1.98
10b.b9
2
7001b
13. 1/ 2
13
17. 1/ 2
17
23.8/13
23
5.0/13
5
b3.b/ 3
1.13
I.I/ 3
.07
7.0/ 2
7.0
l.O/ 2
1.0
-0.0/-0
-0.0
-0.0/-0
-0.0
-3
17
1.07
b.l
0.0
-.19
?.b7
2595.35
1.15
0.00
80) -.03 ( -.05)
00) .12 ( .b8)
11) 112.19 (bb3.bS)
b2) .23 ( .37)
bb) 17. b3 ( 13.31)
.3) 132.1 (IbbS.l)
59) b.29 ( 3.91)
( 13.11)
( .11)
( 3.19)
(faS1.3b)
3
10793
lb.3/ 2
Ib
lb.8/ 2
17
?8.b/13
27
3.7/13
1
88. 1/ 3
1 .bl
I.I/ 3
.07
3b.3/ 2
3b.3
l.O/ 2
1.0
-0.0/-0
-0.0
-0.0/-0
-0.0
2
23
1.59
35.1
0.0
.07
2.03
2231.39
1.91
0.00
.01 (
.35 (
381.88 (b!9.
.85 ( 1.
lb.15 ( 11.
77.0 (2718
S.B1 ( 3.




































02)
Sb)
27)
3b)
30)
.1)
bl)





-------
                                         TABLE
         UNIT Nil.  23S
         VF.HICLE MODEL
              1F.ST NO.
          PLY FURY EM-H
M
I
         BAROMETER 7^2.19 MM Of- HG.
         DRY bULB 1FMP.   Pb.l DfR.  C
         REL. HUMIDITY     37 PCT.

         EXHAUST EMISSIONS

              BLOWER DIF. PRESS., GP,  73b.b  MM.
              BAG RESULTS
              RAG NO.
              PLOWtR REVOLUTIONS
              HC
              HC
              HC
              HC
              no
              ro
              CD
              cu
              cop
              rop
                                             VEHICLE EMISSION RESULTS
                                          1178   LIGHT DUTY EMISSIONS TEST
                                    ACTUAL  DISTANCES USED IN CALCULATIONS
                                DATE  12/29/77                      MFGR. CODE   -o
                                ENGINE    5.90 LITRE  8             CURB WT.     0 KG

                                                             WEI  BULB TEMP  lb.7 DEG. C
                                                              ABS. HUMIDITY   8.1 GRAMS/KG
                                                              COMMENTS  1178 FTPC
                            YR.
                            GVM
197?
   U KG
                                   HPO
     SAMPLE  METER READING/SCALE
     SAMPLE  PPM
     BACKGRD METER RFADING/SCALE
     OACKGRD PPM
     SAMPLE  METER READING/SCALE
     SAMPLE  PPM
     BACKGRD MUTER READING/SCALE
     BACKGRD PPM
             METER READING/SCALE
             PF.RCENT
SAMPLE
SAMPLE
CO?  BACKGRU METER READING/SCALE
CU?  BACKGRO PERCENT
NOX  SAMPLE  METER READING/SCALE
NOX  SAMPLE  PPM
NUX  BACKGRD MFTFR READING/SCALE
NOX  BACKGRD PPM
SOP  SAMPLE  METER REAOING/SCALE
SU2  SAMPLE  PPM
SO?  BACKGRU METER READING/SCALE
SO?  BACKGRD PPM

HC   CONCENTRATION PPM
CO   CONCENTRATION PPM
COP  CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX  CONCENTRATION PPM
ROP  CONCENTRATION PPM
HC   MASS GRAMS
TO   MASS GRAMS
CO?  MASS GRAMS
NOX  MASS GRAMS
SOP  MASS GRAMS
HC GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
CO GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
CO? GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
NOX GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
FUEL CONSUMPTION BY CB  L/100KM  (MPG)
CVS FLOW STD. CU. METRES  (SCF)
CALCULATED DISTANCE KM(MILES)
                                                             BLOWER INLET PRESS., 61 73b.b MM. H20
                                                             BLOWER INLET TEMP.   »3 DEG. C
1
HflHhO
12. 2/ 3
12?
2. I/ 3
PI
9H.1/11
H82
a. 1/11
b
ta.8/ 2
1.89
1.7/ 2
.Ob
32. 7/ a
3a.?
1.3/2
1.3
-0.0/-0
-0.0
-0.0/-0
-0.0
10H
•»53
1.83
31. b
0.0
H.SH
39.87
P538.98
4.20
u.no
.78 ( 1
b.8R ( 1)
H37.91 (70t
.72 ( 1
2
b9blb
20. 5/ 2
PO
19. S/ 2
19
18.3/13
17
5.7/13
b
bB.t/ 3
1.23
H.H/ 3
.07
9.5/ 2
9.5
l.O/ 3
l.U
^,. -0.0/-0
-0.0
-0.0/-0
-0.0
3
12
1.17
8.b
0.0
.21
1.79
2787.15
1.97
0.00
.2b) .03 (
.Ob) .29 (
.bO) HHS.lb (7
.17) .31 (
                                                          19.?b (  IP.??)
                                                           75.b (SbbS.h)
                                                           5.80 (   3.bO)
                                                                   OS)
                                                                   Hb)
                                                                   2b)
                                                                   51)
                                                        19.02  (  12.37)
                                                        130.1  (HS93.2)
                                                         b.2b  (   3.89)
   37.t/ 2
     37
   15.B/ 2
     Ifa
   b3.3/13
     bl
    3.7/13

   89.O/ 3
   l.bb
    3.9/ 3
    .Ob
   Ha.i/ a
   ta.i
    i.o/ a
    1.0
   -0.0/-0
   -o.o
   -0.0/-0
   -o.o

     a»
     55
   l.bO
   HI.a
    o.o
   1.03
   H.89
2aa?.75
   5.50
   0.00
    .IB c   .as)
    .8* (  1.35)
 382.PH (bl5.02)
    .9H (  1.52)
  lb.39 ( 1H.3S)
   75.8 (2b77.2)
   5.83 (  3.b?)
        WEIGHTED FUEL
        WEIGHTED MASS
        WEIGHTED MASS
        WEIGHTED MASS
        WEIGHTED MASS
            TOTAL CVS
        CONSUMPTION L1TRE3/100KM  (MPG)
        HC GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
        CO GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
        COP GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
        NOX URAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
        FLOW =   ?H1.S STO. CU. METRES
                                             18.35  (  12.82)
                                               .?3  (    .37)
                                              l.RO  (   2.90)
                                            •*?h.37  (bBb.03)
                                               .57  (    .9P)

-------
                            TABLE
                                         EXHAUST EMISSIONS FROM SINGLE BAG SAMPLE
                                               VEHICLE NUMBER   R
W

t-1
00
                     DATE t?/?9/77
                     MODEL  197? PLY FURY EM-B
                     DRIVER   AL
                     WET BULB TEMP  17 C
                     SPEC. HUM.    q.? GRAM/KG
                            TIME     -n  HRS.
                            3ET-7
                            TEST  WT.   go1*!  KG.
                            DRY  BULB  TEMP   25  C
                            8ARO.   7HD.7 MM  HG.
        TEST NO.  2
        ENGINE 5.9 LITREV R
        GVW    n KG
        REL. HUM.  f5.7 PCT
        MEASURED FUEL  n.on KG
                       RUN DURATION         ?3.?8 MINUTES
                       BLOWER INLET PRESS.  73b.b  MM. H20
                       BLOWER DIF.   PRESS.  73b.b  MM  H?0
                       BLOWER INLET TEMP.     H?  DEC. C
                       OYMO REVOLUTIONS    31R35
                       BLOWER REVOLUTIONS   1155H3
                       BLOWER cu.  CM /REV.   ???b
                                    METER READING/SCALE
                                    PPM
                            BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
                            BACKGRO PPM
                            SAMPLE   METER READING/SCALE
                            SAMPLE   PPM
                            BACKGRD MFTER READING/SCALE
   BAG  RESULTS
   HC   SAMPLE
   HC   SAMPLE
   HC
   HC
   CO
   CO
   CO
   CO   8ACKGRD PPM
   co?  SAMPLE  MFTER  READING/SCALE
   CO?  SAMPLE  PERCENT
   CO?  BACKGRD METER  READING/SCALE
   CO?  BACKGRD PERCENT
   NOX  SAMPLE  METER  READING/SCALE
   NOX  SAMPLE  PPM
   NOX  BACKGRO METER  READING/SCALE
   NOX  8ACKGRD PPM
   HC   CONCENTRATION  PPM
   CO   CONCENTRATION  PPM
   CO?  CONCENTRATION  PCT
   NOX  CONCENTRATION  PPM
   SO?  COCENTRATION PPM
   HC   MASS  (GRAMS)
   CD   MASS  (GRAMS)
   CO?  MASS  (GRAMS)
   NOX  MASS  (GRAMS)
   SO?  MASS  (GRAMS)
HC  GRAMS/KILOMETRE       .03
TO  GRAMS/KILOMETRE       .31
CO? GRAMS/KILOMETRE   327
NOX GRAMS/KILOMETRE       .bS
SO? GRAMS/KILOMETRE     tl.flO

HC  GRAMS/KG OF FUEL    .30
co  GRAMS/KG OF FUEL    3.3
CO? GRAMS/KG OF FUEL   31b3
NOX GRAMS/KG OF FUEL   h.n
SO? GRAMS/KG OF FUEL   0.00
   it. 9/2
     15
   in.
     11
     33
    l.l/*
      1
   13.H/2
    .Ob
   38. H/?
   38. <»
     .9/2
     .9
      b
     30
   1.87
   37. b
   0.0
    .bR
   7.39
7187.70
  1».3B
   n.oo
                                                     HC   GRAMS/MIN    .03
                                                     CO   GRAMS/MIN     .3
                                                     co?  GRAMS/MIN    309
                                                     NOX  GRAMS/MIN    .b?
                                                     so?  GRAHS/MIN   o.no
                    CARBON BALANCE  FUEL  ECONOMY  =    1».02  LITRES PER HUNDRED KILOMETERS

-------
                             TABLE
                    EXHAUST EMISSIONS FROM SINGLE BAG SAMPLE
                          VEHICLE NUMBER   8
H
 I
                     DATE  l?/?9'/77               TIME     -0 HRS.         TEST NO.  2
                     MODEL   1977  PLY  FURY  EM-8   SET-7                  ENGINE 5.9 LITREO
                     RUN DURATION   23.SB  MIN.   DISTANCE DRIVEN   21.95 KILOMETRES
                     CVS BLOWER  TEST  VOL.   2«»9.89 ACT.  CU. METRES
SULFATE DATA

 FILTER NO.
 SAMPLE VOL. CU. FT.
 SAMPLE TEMP. DEC. F
 SAMPUE AREA SO. IN.
 DILUTION FACTOR
 STAND. DEN. MICROG/ML
 STAND. AREA SO. IN.
 SO't.MlCROG/FILTER

SULFUR DIOXIDE DATA

 SAMPLE VOL. CU. FT.
 SAMPLE TEMP. DEG. F
 AREA,BUBBLER ]
 OIL. FACT.,BUBBLER 1
 APEA,BUBBLER 2
 OIL. FACT.,BUBBLER 2
 STAND. DEN. MICROG/ML
 STAND. AREA,SO. IN.
 soa, MILLIG/BUBBLER i
 so?, MILLIG/BUBBLER ?.
 SO?, PPM
                                                 SAMPLE
                                               t7-FH-2Bb3
                                                  15.85
                                                     78
                                               St952.00
                                                      1
                                                   5.on
                                              l"»3b?b.OO
                                                 19.130
 1.00
   70
 0.00
    1
 0.00
    1
 1.00
 1.00
0.000
0.000
  0.0
                      SULFATE AND SO? EMISSIONS
                       NET SULFATE,MILLIGRAM/TEST
                       NET Hssot,MILLIGRAM/TEST
                       NET 302,GRAM/TEST
                       NET SULFATE,MILLIGRAM/KILOMETRE
                       NET H230*,MILLIGRAM/KILOMETRE
                       NET 302,GRAM/KILOMETRE
                      SULFUR BALANCE
                       FUEL WT.,  2272 GRAMS
                                 SULFUR,GRAMS
                                 PCT.  RECOVERY
                                      12.15H
                                      12.H09
                                       o.oon
                                        .S5H
                                        .585
                                       0.000
                                                  BACKGROUND
                          1.00
                            70
                          0.00
                             1
                          1.00
                          I.00
                         0.000
 I .00
   70
 0.00
    1
 n.oo
    1
 1.00
 1.00
0.000
0.000
  0.0
                          SULFUR IN FUEL, .0320 PCT.
                           FUEL      302       H2SOH
                            .73
                                    0.000
                                     n.oo
                   .no*!
                     .5b
     302 *• H2SO»

         .00*1
           .Sb

-------
I
M
O
                                          FXHAUST EMISSIONS FROM  SJNULF  HAG  SAMPLE
                                                VEHICLE NUMBER  ? 3 "5
                     D A T F  I r1 / i? 9 / 7 7
                     Mlintl   in?!!  ^LY  FURY EH-R
                     DRIVE"    Al
                     "f-. T  rtill M  IEMP   17 .f.
                     S P f C .  HUM.    8 . H G K A M / K G
                     MISMNI.F   Ih.tbS KM
                          TIME     -II MRS.
                          HFET
                          TFS1  WT.   ?0»1 KG.
                          DRY  BULB  TEMP  ?b C
                          HARO.   7H(J.? MM  HG.
          TEST NO.   3
          ENGINES^.I) LITREV  R
          r;vv«    n KG
          REL. HUM.  Hn.s  PCT
          MEASURED FUEL   n.on  KG
                            FUEL  738.? G/LITRE   FUEL HC  RATIO
                       RUN  DURATION
                       BLOWER  INLET  PRESS.
                       BLOWER  [)IF.   PRESS.
                       «Lcwt«  INLET  TFMH.
                       PYNO  REVOLUTIONS
                       BLOWER  REVOLUTIONS
                       HLOWER  CU.  CM /REV.
                      l?.7b  MINUTES
                     73b.h   MM.  HeO
                     73b.b   MM   HSO
                        •»3   DEC.  C
                       blt85
BAG RESULTS
 HC  SAMPLE
 HC  SAMPLE
 HC
 HC
 CO
 CO
 CO
 CO
                                     METER READING/SCALE
                                     PPM
                             RACKURD  MFTER RFAOING/SCALE
                             BACKGRO  PPM
                             SAMPLE
                             SAMPLE
            MFTFR  READING/SCALE
            PPM
    BACKGRO METER  READING/SCALE
    BACKGRO PPM
    SAMPLE  METER  READING/SCALE
CO? SAMPLE  PERCENT
CO? BACKGRO METER  READING/SCALE
CO? BACKGRO PERCENT
NOX SAMPLE  METER  READING/SCALE
NOX SAMPLE  PH"
NOX BACKGRD METER  READING/SCALE
NOX BACKGRO PPM
HC  CONCENTRATION  PPM
CO  CONCENTRATION  PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION  PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION  PPM
SO? COCENTRATION PPM
HC  MASS (GRAMS)
CO  MASS (GRAMS)
CO? MASS (GRAMS)
NOX MASS (GRAMS)
SO? MASS (GRAMS)
                     HC  GRAMS/KM  (GRAMS/MILE)
                     CO  GRAMS/KM  (GRAMS/MILE)
                     CO? GRAMS/KM  (GRAMS/MILE)
                     NOX GRAMS/KM  (GRAMS/MILE)
                     SO? GRAMS/KM  (GRAMS/MILE)

                     HC  r,RAMS/KG  OF  FUEL     .?H
                     CO  GRAMS/KG  OF  FUEL     ?.5
                     CO? GRAMS/KG  OF  FUEL    3)b5
                     NOX GRAMS/KG  OF  FUEL    8.70
                     SO? GRAMS/KG  OF  FUEL    0.00
                                .05  (
                                .?a  (
                                28«f  (
                                .78  (
                               0.00  (
     1H.R/ Z
       15
     11. 3/ ?
       11
     31.R/13
       30
       .1/13
        1
     50. O/ 2
     2.8H
      1.7/ 2
      .lib
     b3.3/ 2
     b3.3
      l.O/ 2
      1.0
        5
       an
     a. as
     ba.s
     u.ci
      .31?
     3.b9
                                                                   12. Bb
                                                                    0.00
 .Of)
 .3b)
1.2b)
0 . 0 0 )
                               HC   GRAMS/MIN
                               CO   GRAMS/MIN
                               C02  GRAMS/MIN
                               NOX  GRAMS/MIN
                               802  GRAMS/MIN
         .03
          .3
         3b?
        1.01
        0.0(1
                     CARHDN OALANCE  FUEL  FCiiNOMY L/10DKM (MILES/GALLON)
                                                       12.15  (  11.37)

-------
                                   TABLE
    UNIT  NO.   EM8
    VEHICLE  MODEL
                   TEST NO.
               FURY PLY
to
                                           H20
BAROMETER 750.88 MM OF HG.
DRY BULB TEMP.   SI.I DEG. C'
REL. HUMIDITY     23 PCT.

EXHAUST EMISSIONS

     BLOWER DIF. PRESS., G2, 73b.b MM.
     BAG RESULTS
     BAG NO.
     BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
     HC   SAMPLE  METER READING/SCALE
     HC   SAMPLE  PPM
     HC   BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
     HC   BACKGRD PPM
     CO   SAMPLE  METER READING/SCALE
     CO   SAMPLE  PPM
     CO   BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
     CO   BACKGRD FPM
     C02  SAMPLE  METER READING/SCALE
     C02  SAMPLE  PERCENT
     C02  BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
     C02  BACKGRD PERCENT
     NOX  SAMPLE  METER READING/SCALE
     NOX  SAMPLE  PPM
     NOX  BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
     NOX  6ACKGRD PPM
     302  SAMPLE  METER READING/SCALE
     S02  SAMPLE  PPM
     302  BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
     802  BACKGRD PPM
         HC   CONCENTRATION PPM
         CO   CONCENTRATION PPM
         C02   CONCENTRATION PCT
         NOX   CONCENTRATION PPM
         302   CONCENTRATION PPM
         HC   MASS GRAMS
         CO   MASS GRAMS
         C02   MASS GRAMS
         NOX   MASS GRAMS
         302   MASS GRAMS
         HC GRAMS/KM  (GRAMS/MILE)
         CO GRAMS/KM  (GRAMS/MILE)
         C02  GRAMS/KM  (GRAMS/MILE)
         NOX  GRAMS/KM  (GRAMS/MILE)
         FUEL CONSUMPTION  BY  CB L/100KM  (MPG)
         CVS  FLOW  STD.  CU.  METRES  (SCF)
         CALCULATED DISTANCE  KM(MILES)
             VEHICLE EMISSION RESULTS
          1978  LIGHT DUTY EMISSIONS TEST
    ACTUAL DISTANCES USED IN CALCULATIONS
DATE  I/ 3/78                     MFGR.  CODE   -0
ENGINE   5.^0 LITRE 8             CURB WT.      0 KG

                             WET BULB TEMP   10.b DEG. C
                              ABS. HUMIDITY   3.5 GRAMS/KG
                              COMMENTS  1178 FTP-C
YR.
GVM
1177
   0 KG
   WEIGHTED  FUEL
   WEIGHTED  MASS
   WEIGHTED  MASS
   WEIGHTED  MASS
   WEIGHTED  MASS
       TOTAL  CVS
             CONSUMPTION LITRES/100KM (MPG)
             HC GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
             CO GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
             C02 GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
             NOX GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
             FLOW =   £85.b STD. CU. METRES
                             BLOWER INLET PRESS.,  Gl 73b.b MM. H20
                             BLOWER INLET TEMP.    f2 DEG.  C
1
f0558
12. S/ 3
125
8.S/ 2
q
1b.l/ll
SOI
2.b/ll
a
17. f/ 3
1.83
f.S/ 3
.07
37. 8/ 2
37.8
,8/ 2
.8
-0.0/-0
-0.0
-0.0/-0
-0.0
118
f72
1.77
37.1
0.0
5.22
f2.2b
2f 1b.37
f .f 1
0.00
.SO ( 1.
7.30 ( 11.
f31.23 (b13.
.7b ( 1.
11.02 C 12.
7b.8 (2713
5.71 ( 3.
18.18
.22
1.81
H22.S1
.hi
2
blbSl
10. b/ 2
11
.I/ 3
1
22.0/13
21
2.0/11
b
b8.2/ 3
1.23
f.8/ 3
.07
11. SX 2
11.5
.7X 2
.7
-0.0/-0
-0.0
-0.0/-0
-0.0
2
IS
l.lb
10.1
0.0
.18
2.2?
2803.85
2.22
0.00
fS) .03 ( .05)
75) .3b ( .58)
85) fff.02 (71f.f3)
23) .35 ( .57)
37) 18.18 ( 12.31)
.5) 131.1 (fbSI.S)
bO) b.31 ( 3.12)
( 12. If)
( .35)
( 2.11)
(b71.B2)
( .17)
3
f OSf 8
15. S/ 2
IS
8. I/ 2
8
3b.l/13
3t
5.3/13
5
Bb.f/ 3
l.bO
t.2/ 3
.Ob
H8.1/ 2
•»8.1
.?X 2
.7
-0.0/-0
-0.0
-0.0/-0
-0.0
8
28
1.55
»7.5
0.0
.37
2.53
217*. b3
S.bH
0.00
.Ob (
.Ht (
37f.8S (b03.
.17 ( 1.
Ib.Ot ( If.
7b.B (2712
5.80 ( 3.





































10)
70)
13)
57)
b?)
.b)
bl)






-------
                                TARI.F
                                             FXHAUST  EMISSIONS  FROM  SINGLE  RAG  SAMPLE

                                                   VFHICLE  NUMBER    8
W
 I
                         PATE   I/
                         MOOFL   1177  FURY  PLY
                         DRTVFR    SR
                         WET  RULR  TFMP   i? C
                         3PFC.  HUH.    3.P  GRAM/KG
                           RUN  DURATION          ?3.?<
                           RLOWER  INLET  PRESS.  711.?
                           BLOWER  DIF.   PRESS.  711.?
                           BLOWER  INLFT  TEMP.      43
                           DYNO REVOLUTIONS     31b19
                           BLOWER  REVOLUTIONS    ii??s?
                           BLOWER  CD.  CM /REV.
  BAG RESULTS
   HC   SAMPLE  METF.R READING/SCALE
   HC   SAMPLE  PPM
   HC   BACKGRD METER RE AH ING/SCALE
   HC   BACKGRD PPM
   CO   SAMPLE  METER READING/SCALE
   CO   SAMPLE  PPM
   CO   BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
   CO   BACKGRD PPM
   CO?  SAMPLE  METFR READING/SCALE
   CO?  SAMPLE  PERCENT
   CO?  BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
   CO?  BACKGRD PERCENT
   NOX  SAMPLE  METER READING/SCALE
   NOX  SAMPLE  PPM
   NOX  BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
   NOX  BACKGRD PPM
   HC   CONCENTRATION PPM
   CO   CONCENTRATION PPM
   CO?  CONCENTRATION PCT
   NOX  CONCENTRATION PPM
   SO?  COCENTRATION PPM
   HC   MASS (GRAMS)
   CO   MASS (GRAMS)
   CO?  MASS (GRAMS)
   NOX  MASS (GRAMS)
   SO?  MASS (GRAMS)

HC  GRAMS/KILOHETRE      .03
CO  GRAMS/KILOMETRE      .?9
CO? GRAMS/KILOMETRE   339
NOX GRAMS/KILOMETRE      .81
SO? GRAMS/KILOMETRE     0.00

HC  GRAMS/KG OF FUEL    .??
CO  GRAMS/KG OF FUEL    ?.?
CO? GRAMS/KG OF FUEL   31hH
NOX GRAMS/KG OF FUEL   7.bO
so? GRAMS/KG OF FUEL   n.nn
 TIME     -n  HRS.
 SFT-7
 TFST  WT.   ?rm  KG.
 DRY  BULB  TEMP   ?*  C
 BARO.   751.3  MM   Hf,.


?9  MINUTES
   MM.  H?0
   MM   H?0
   DEG.  C
                                                   TEST  NO.   2
                                                   ENGINE  S.q LITREV  H
                                                   GVW     0 KG
                                                   PEL.  HUM.  11.7 PCT
                                                   MEASURED FUEL  o.on KG
                                                                        l?
                                                                       R.l/?
                                                                         8
                                                                        ?8

                                                                       ?.!/*
                    .08
                   5-».0/2
                   SH.n
                     .b/2
                     .b
                      s
                     ?s
                   1.89
                   53.5
                   0.0
                    .b3
                   b.?7
                                                                     17.77
                                                                      o.no
                                                        HC  GRAMS/MIN     .03
                                                        CO  GRAMS/MIN      .3
                                                        CO? GRAMS/MIN     318
                                                        NOX GRAMS/MIN     ,?b
                                                        SO? GRAMS/MIN    0.00
                        CARBON BALANCE FUEL ECONOMY =    1H.5? LITRES PER  HUNDRED  KILOMETERS

-------
                             TABLE
                                          EXHAUST EMISSIONS FROM SINGLE BAG SAMPLE
                                                VEHICLE NUMBER   B
                      DATE  I/ 3/78              TIME    -0 HRS.        TEST NO.  3
                      MODEL  1177 FURY PLY       SET-7                  ENGINE 5.9 LITREO
                      RUN DURATION   53.39 MIN.  DISTANCE DRIVEN  31.81 KILOMETRES
                      CVS BLOWER TF3T VOL.  350.*5 ACT. CU. METRF.S
W
I
to
U)
SUI.FATE DATA

 FILTER NO.
 SAMPLE VOL. CU. FT.
 SAMPLE TEMP. DEC. F
 SAMPLE AREA SO. IN.
 DILUTION FACTOR
 STAND. DEN. MICROG/ML
 STAND. AREA SO. IN.
 SO*,MICROG/FILTER

SULFUR DIOXIDE DATA

 SAMPLE VOL. CU. FT.
 SAMPLE TEMP. DEC. F
 AREA,BUBBLER 1
 OIL. FACT.,BUBBLER 1
 AREA,BUBBLER 3
 OIL. FACT.,BUBBLER 3
 STAND. DEN. MICROG/ML
 STAND. AREA,SQ. IN.
 503, MILLIG/BUBBLER 1
 303, MILLIG/BUBBLER ?
 S03, PPM
                                                 SAMPLE
                                               *7-FH-38b5
                                                  15.8*
                                                     78
                                               7*835.00
                                                      1
                                                   5.00
                                              l*b99b.oo
                                                 35.*55
 l.no
   70
 o.oo
    l
 0.00
    1
 1.00
 1.00
0.000
0.000
  0.0
                                                  BACKGROUND
                          I .00
                            70
                          0.00
                             1
                          1.00
                          1.00
                         0.000
 1.00
   70
 0.00
    1
 0.00
    1
 1.00
 I .00
0.000
0.000
  0.0
                      SULFATE AND 303 EMISSIONS

                       NET SULFATE,MILLIGRAM/TEST           lb.190
                       NET H2SOH,MILLIGRAM/TEST             lb.530
                       NET 303,GRAM/TEST                     0.000
                       NET SULFATE,MILLIGRAM/KILOMETRE        .7*3
                       NET H3SO*,MILLIGRAM/KILOMETRE          .758
                       NET SOB,GRAM/KILOMETRE                o.ooo
                      SULFUR BALANCE
                       FUEL WT., 3339 RRAMS
                                 SULFUR,GRAMS
                                 PCT. RECOVERY
                          SULFUR IN FUEL, .0330 PCT.
                           FUEL      303       H3S01
                            .75
                                    0.000
                                     o.oo
                   .OOSH
                     .73
     303 + H3S01*

         .005*
           .73

-------
        TABLE
                     EXHAUST  EMISSIONS  FROM  SINGLE  BAG SAMPLE
                           VEHICLE  NUMBER    S
 DATF   I/  3/7R
 MODEL   1177  FURY  PLY
 DRIVER    SR
 WET  HUL8  TEMP   if  C
 RPFC.  HUM.    3.R  GRAM/KG
                     TIME    -n HRS.
                     FET
                     TEST WT.  ?n>»i KG.
                     DRY RULB TEMP  ?>» C
                     BARO.  751.3 MM  HG.
                                           TEST NO.  3
                                           ENGINE 5.9 LITREV R
                                           GVW    n KG
                                           BEL. HUM.  19.7 PCT
                                           MEASURED FUEL  o.on KG
   RUN  DURATION
   BLOWER  INLET  PRESS.
   BLOWER  DIF.   PRESS.
   BLOWFR  INLET  TEMP.
   OYNO  REVOLUTIONS
   RLOWEH  REVOLUTIONS
   RLOWER  CU. CM  /REV.
                 12.7b MINUTES
                711.3  MM. H?0
                711.?  MM  H?0
                   H?  DEC. C
                239?!
                  K1553
  BAG
   HC
   HC
   HC
   HC
   CO
   CO
   CO
   CO
   CO?
   CO?
   CO?
   CO?
   NOX
   NOX
   NOX
   NOX
   HC
   CO
   CO?
   NOX
   SO?
   HC
   CO
   CO?
   NOX
   SO?
RESULTS
 SAMPLE
 SAMPLE
        METER READING/SCALE
        PPM
BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
BACKGRO PPM
SAMPLF
SAMPLE
         METER READING/SCALE
         PPM
 8ACKGRO METER READING/SCALE
 BACKGRD PPM
 SAMPLE  METER READING/SCALE
 SAMPLE  PERCENT
 BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
 BACKGRD PERCENT
 SAMPLE  METER READING/SCALE
 SAMPLF  PPM
 BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
 BACKGRD PPM
 CONCENTRATION PPM
 CONCENTRATION PPM
 CONCENTRATION PCT
 CONCENTRATION PPM
 COCENTRATION PPM
 MASS (GRAMS)
 MASS (GRAMS)
 MASS (GRAMS)
 MASS (GRAMS)
 MASS (GRAMS)
HC  GRAMS/KILOMETRE       .0?
CO  GRAMS/KILOMETRE       .1?
co? GRAMS/KILOMETRE   ?en
NO* GRAMS/KILOMETRE       .85
SO? GRAMS/KILOMETRE     0.00

HC  GRAMS/KG OF FUEL    .?•»
CO  GRAMS/KG OF FUEL    1.3
CO? GRAMS/KG OF FUEL   31b?
NOX GRAMS/KG OF FUEL   9.51
30? GRAMS/KG OF FUEL   O.ntl
                                         1?
   R
17. I/*
  Ib
 l.b/*
   ?
HB.9/?
?.??
 1.7/8
 .Ob
                                      77. •»
                                        .5
                                         5
                                        1*
                                      2.17
                                      77.0
                                      0.0
                                       .3b
                                      1.9>»
                                   4b7b.l?
                                     1».OS
                                      n.no
                          HC  GRAMS/MIN    .03
                          CO  GRAMS/MIN     .?
                          co? GRAMS/MIN    3b?
                          NOX GRAMS/MIN   1.10
                          SO? GRAMS/MIN   0.00
CARBON BALANCE FUEL ECONOMY =    1?.11 LITRES  PER  HUNDRED  KILOMETERS

-------
    UNIT  NO.   EMB
    VEHICLE  MODEL
      TEST NO, 1
FURY PLYMOUTH
TABLE                   VEHICLE EMISSION RESULTS
                1175  LIGHT DUTY EMISSIONS TEST
          DATE  1/24/78                     MFGR. CODE
          ENGINE   5.10 LITRE B             CURB WT.
-0
0 KG
YR.  1177
GVM     0 KG
    BAROMETER  737.U  MM OF HG.
    DRY  BULB  TEMP.    22.2 DEG.  C
    REL.  HUMIDITY      42 PCT.
    EXHAUST  EMISSIONS

         BLOWER OIF.  PRESS.,
         BAG RESULTS
fd
i
          G2, 73b.b MM. H20
BAG NO.
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
HC SAMPLE METER READING/SCALE
HC SAMPLE PPM
HC BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
HC BACKGRD PPM
CO SAMPLE METER READING/SCALE
CO SAMPLE PPM
CO BACKGRD MFTER READING/SCALE
CO BACKGRD PPM
C02 SAMPLE METER READING/SCALE
C02 SAMPLE PERCENT
C02 BACKGRD MF.TER READING/SCALE
C02 BACKGRD PERCENT
NOX SAMPLE METER READING/SCALE
NOX SAMPLE PPM
NOX BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
NOX BACKGRD PPM
S02 SAMPLE METER READING/SCALE
S02 SAMPLE PPM
S02 BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
S02 BACKGRD PPM
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
CO? CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
S02 CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
1
42508
85.9/2
8b
8.7/2
1
S3. I/*
480
1.4/*
4
IS. 4/3
1.85
4.5/3
.07
44.7/2
44.7
.S/2
.1
-O.O/*
-n.o
-O.O/*
-0.0
78
453
1.80
43.1
0.0
3.57
41.51
C02 MASS GRAMS 2bOb.28
NOX MASS GRAMS
S02 MASS GRAMS
WEIGHTED MASS HC .17 GRAMS/KILOMETRE
WEIGHTED MASS CO 2.02 GRAMS/K ILOMETRE
WEIGHTED MASS C02 Htl.57 GRAMS/KILOMETRE
WEIGHTED MASS NOX .85 GRAMS/KILOMETRE
WEIGHTED MASS S02 H.OO GRAMS/KILOMETRE
5.15
a. no





                                                       WET BULB  TEMP   14.4  DEG.  C
                                                        AB3. HUMIDITY    7.2  GRAMS/KG
                                       BLOWER INLET PRESS., Gl 73b.b MM. H20
                                       BLOWER INLET TEMP.   43 DEG. C
                                                     2
                                                  71883
                                                   11.2/2
                                                     11
                                                    8.1/2
                                                      8
                                                   2b.3/*
                                                     25
                                                    1.7/*
                                                      2
                                                   b8.4/3
                                                   1.23
                                                    2.1/3
                                                    .04
                                                   17.3/2
                                                   17.3
                                                    1.0/2
                                                    1.0
                                                   -D.O/*
                                                   -0.0
                                                   -O.O/*
                                                   -0.0

                                                      4
                                                     22
                                                   1.11
                                                   Ib.f
                                                    0.0
                                                    .30
                                                   3.41
                                                2922.13
                                                   3.75
                                                   0.00
                                                                                         3
                                                                                      40110
                                                                                       14.b/2
                                                                                         15
                                                                                        8.2/2
                                                                                          e
                                                                                       bb.2/*
                                                                                         b4
                                                                                        3. I/*
                                                                                          3
                                                                                       81.3/3
                                                                                       l.bb
                                                                                        3.4/3
                                                                                        .05
                                                                                       54.0/2
                                                                                       54.0
                                                      .1
                                                    -O.O/*
                                                    -0.0
                                                    -O.O/*
                                                    -0.0

                                                       7
                                                      5S
                                                    I.b2
                                                    53.2
                                                     0.0
                                                     .32
                                                    5.18
                                                 2255.81
                                                    b.92
                                                    0.00
         FUEL ECONOMY BY CARBON BALANCE =   5.3  KILOMETRE/LITRE

-------
    UN I T  >i(J.   f. Mfl
    VfcUlCLF.  MODEL
    TEST Nil.
PLY FURY FM R
                                TAULt                   VEHICLE EMISSION  RESULTS
                                                     197H  LIGHT DUTY EMISSIONS  TEST
                                               ACTUAL  DISTANCES USED IN CALCULATIONS
                                   1       DATE   l/2b/7H                      MFGR.  CODE
                                           ENGINE    5.9(1 LITRE 8              CURB  WT.
-0
0 KG
YR.
GVM
1H77
   U KG
w
I
                                  73b.b  MM.  H20
HAPOHFI'R  7HP.II3  MM  OF  HP,.
DKY MMLh  ItMP.    ,M.9 DEH. L
HI- L . HiMIOI TY      I h PC f .

fcKHAUSl FMISSIONS

     RLl'WEH UIF.  PUfcSS.,  02,
     RAC, iVfSUl.TS
     PA(. NO.
     RLOWFH REVOLUTIONS
     HC    SAMPLE   Ml FFR READING/SCALE
     HC    SAMPLE   PPM
     HC    HACKGHD  METER READING/SCALE
     HC    HACKGHD  PPM
     CO    SAKPLt   MeTER READING/SCALE
     TO    SAMPLE   PPM
     TO    HACKGRD  ME TEH READING/SCALE
     CO    HACKGRD  PPM
     CU?   SAMPLE   METER HEAOING/SCALE
     ro?   SAMPLE   PERCENT
     TO?   HACKGRD  MFTER READING/SCALE
     CO?   RACKGRD  PERCENT
     NOX   SAMPLE   METER READING/SCALE
     NOX   SAMPLE   PPM
     NOX   BACKGRD  METER READING/SCALE
     NOX   flACKGRD  PPM
     80?   SAMPLE   MFTER READING/SCALE
     SO?   SAMPLE   PPM
     S02   BACKGHI)  MFTFH HEADING/SCALE
     S02   BACKGRD  PPM

     HC    CONCENTRATION PPM
     CO    CONCENTRATION PPM
     CO?  CONCENTRATION PCT
     NOX  CONCENTRATION PPM
     SO?  CONCENTRATION PPM
     HC   MASS GRAMS
     CU   MASS GRAMS
     CU?  MASS GRAMS
     NOX  MASS GRAMS
     SO?  MASS GRAMS
     HC CRAMS/KM (URAMS/MILE)
     CO GRAMS/KM (RHAMS/MILE)
     CO? bRAMS/KM  (GRAMS/MILE)
     NUX L.HAMS/KM  ( GRAMS/M TLE )
     FUfL  CONSUMPTION BY CR   L/101'KM (MPG)
     CVS FLU*.  STU. CU.  METRES  ISCF)
     CALCULATED DISTANCE KM(MILES)
                                                                            WET BULB TEMP   11.1  DEG.  C
                                                                             AHS. HUMIDITY    ?.9 GRAMS/KG
                                                                             COMMENTS   197H  FTPC
                                                         BLOWER INLET PRESS.,  Gl  73b.b MM. HgQ
                                                         BLOWER INLET TEMP.    H3  DEG.  C
1
* IJ b 7 1
71. 8/ 2
72
ID. 3/ 2
1U
73.9/11
32*
.7/11
2
*2. 2/ 2
1.85
1. 3/ 2
.115
*7. B/ 2
*7. R
.b/ 2
.b
-0.0/-0
-n.o
-II.O/-0
-II. 0
b3
309
1.81
*7.3
n.u
2.78
27.5?
;*7.aa
5.52
0.00
.*7 ( ,7b)
*.h8 ( 7.53)
32.71 (b9h.?3)
.9* ( 1.51)
18. R5 ( 12. *R)
7b.7 (27(17.2)
5.H9 ( 3.bb)
2
b971H
11. */ ?-
11
8. I/ 2
R
2b.b/ld
25
1.7/13
2
b8. 3/ 3
1.23
3.5/ 3
.05
18. S/ Z
18.5
.*/ i
.»
-0.0/-0
-0.0
-0.0/-U
-O.U
H
23
1.18
18.1
0.0
.29
3.51
28*1.19
3.b3
0.00
.05 ( .07)
.55 ( .88)
**2.37 (711.77)
.57 ( .91)
18.92 ( 12. *3)
131.* (*b*0.0)
b.*2 ( 3.99)
3
*059b
lb.9/ 2
17
9.3/ 2
9
70.1/13
bB
1.5/13
1
87. b/ 3
I.b3
*.0/ 3
.Ob
58. S/ 2
58.5
.7/ Z
.7
-0.0/-0
-0.0
-0.0/-0
-0.0
9
bS
1.57
57.9
0.0
.39
5.7b
2205.23
b.75
0.00
.07 (
.98 ( 1.
375.93 (bO*.
1.15 ( 1.
lb.12 ( 1*.
7b.5 (2702
5.87 ( 3.
































11)
58)
87)
85)
59)
.0)
b5)
  WEIGHTED FUEL CONSUMPTION LITRES/IIIDKM  (MPT,)
  WEIGHTFU MASS HC  GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MlLt)
  Wtll^HlED MASS CO  GHAMS/RM (GRAMS/MILE)
  HE1GH1FO MASS COS UKAMS/KM (r^RAMS/MILE)
  HtlGHTFO MASS NOX GKAMS/r\H (GRAMS/MILE)
      TOTAL l.vf< FLOW =   ?BH.h ?TO. CM. METRFS
                                        1H.1* ( 12.9fa)
                                          .1* (   .22)
                                         1.52 (  2.**)
                                       H2E.3D (b 79.*9)
                                          .80 (  1.89)

-------
                                TABLE
 UNIT NO.  EMB
 VEHICLE MODEL
         TEST NO.
     FURY PLY
                                            VEHICLE  EMISSION  RESULTS
                                         197B   LIGHT DUTY  EMISSIONS TEST
                                   ACTUAL DISTANCES  USED  IN CALCULATIONS
                               DATE  e/ 3/78                     MFGR, CODE
                               ENGINE   5.10 LITRE 8             CURB WT.
•0
0 KG
YR.  1177
GVM     0 KG
 BAROMETER 7m.*b MM OF HG.
 DRY BULB TEMP.   ?3.3 DEC. C
 REL. HUMIDITY     30 PCT.

 EXHAUST EMISSIONS

      BLOWER OIF. PRESS.,  G?, 73h.b MM,
      BAG RESULTS
      BAG NO.
      BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
                             HSO
      HC
      HC
      HC
      HC
      CO
      CO
      CO
      CO
      cos
      COS
      COS
      COS
      NOX
      NOX
      NOX
      NOX
      802
      SOS
      SOS
      SOS
SAMPLE  METER READING/SCALE
SAMPLE  PPM
BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
BACKGRO PPM
SAMPLE  METER READING/SCALE
SAMPLE  PPM
BACKGRO METER READING/SCALE
BACKGRO PPM
SAMPLE  METER READING/SCALE
SAMPLE  PERCENT
BACKGRO METER READING/SCALE
BACKGRD PERCENT
SAMPLE  METER READING/SCALE
SAMPLE  PPM
BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
BACKGPD PPM
        METER READING/SCALE
        PPM
SAMPLE
SAMPLE
BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
BACKGRD PPM
      HC   CONCENTRATION PPM
      CO   CONCENTRATION PPM
      COS  CONCENTRATION PCT
      NOX  CONCENTRATION PPM
      so?  CONCENTRATION PPM
      HC   MASS GRAMS
      CO   MASS GRAMS
      COS  MASS GRAMS
      NOX  MASS GRAMS
      SOS  MASS GRAMS
      HC GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
      co GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
      CO? GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
      NOX GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MRE)
      FUEL CONSUMPTION BY CB  L/IOOKM CMPG)
      cvs FLOW STO. cu. METRES CSCF)
      CALCULATED DISTANCE KM(MRES)
WEIGHTED FUEL
WEIGHTED MASS
WEIGHTED MASS
WEIGHTED MASS
WEIGHTED MASS
    TOTAL CVS
   CONSUMPTION LITRES/100KM (MpG)
   HC GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
   CO GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
   COt GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
   NOX GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MRE)
   FLOW «   38S.b STD.  CU.  METRES
                                                            WET  BULB  TEMP   13.3  DEG. C
                                                             AB8.  HUMIDITY    5.8  GRAMS/KG
                                                             COMMENTS  1178  FTP-C
                                                            BLOWER  INLET PRESS,, 61  73b.b MM, H80
                                                            BLOWER  INLET TEMP,   >»3  DEG, C
1
*0b80
85. BX t
Bb
I.I/ !
10
17.5/11
51H
1.0/11
3
11, 3/ 3
1,70
H.S/ 3
.07
37. I/ S
37.1
.7/ !
.7
-0.0/-0
•0,0
-0.0/-0
•0,0
77
»10
l.b»
3b,5
0.0
3.31
»3.tS
esii.ii
*.S3
0.00
.58 (
7,»» ( 11.
312. b
-------
                              TABLE
                 FXHAUST EMISSIONS FROM SINGLE BAG SAMPLE
                       VEHICLE NUMBER EMS
w
 I
to
03
                       DATE   ?/  3/7P
                       MODEL   1977  FURY  PLY
                       DRIVER   BP
                       WET  BULB  TEMP   11 c
                       SPEC.  HUM. •   t.t»  GRAM/KG
                       DISTANCE   21.837  KM
                        TIME    -0 MRS.
                        SET-7
                        TEST WT.  ?0»1 KG.
                        DRY BULB TEMP  2H C
                        BARO.  7H8.S MM  HG.
                          FUEL 738.2 G/LITRE
                                                TEST NO.   ?
                                                ENGINE 5.1 LITREV 8
                                                GVW    0  KG
                                                REL. HUM.  22.7 PCT
                                                MEASURED  FUEL  o.oo KG
                                                FUEL HC  RATIO 1.8bO
                         RUN  DURATION
                         BLOWER  INLET  PRESS.
                         BLOWER  r>IF.   PRESS.
                         BLOWER  INLET  TEMP.
                         DYNO REVOLUTIONS
                         BLOWER  REVOLUTIONS
                         BLOWER  CU.  CM /REV.
                    23. ?8 MINUTES
                   7b?.0  MM. H20
                   7b?,0  MM  H20
                      »3  DEG. C
                   31735
                    2??b
                                      METF.R  READING/SCALE
                                      PPM
                              BACKGRO  METER  READING/SCALE
                              BACKGRO  PPM
                              SAMPLE   METER  READING/SCALE
                              SAMPLE   PPM
                              BACKGRO  METER  READING/SCALE
BAG RESULTS
 HC  SAMPLE
 HC  SAMPLE
 HC
 HC
 co
 co
 co
 CO  BACKGRD PPM
 co? SAMPLE  METER READING/SCALE
 CO? SAMPLE  PERCENT
 co? BACKGRO METER READING/SCALE
 CO? BACKGRD PERCENT
             METER READING/SCALE
             PPM
 NOX BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
 NOX BACKGRO PPM
 HC  CONCENTRATION PPM
 CO  CONCENTRATION PPM
 CO? CONCENTRATION PCT
 NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
 SO? COCENTRATION PPM
 HC  MASS (GRAMS)
          (GRAMS)
          (GRAMS)
NOx SAMPLE
NOX SAMPLE
                          CO   MASS
                          CO?  MASS
                          NOX  MASS  (GRAMS)
                          302  M*SS  (GRAMS)
                       HC   GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
                       CO   GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MRE)
                       C02  GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
                       NOX  GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
                       SO?  GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)

                       HC   GRAMS/KG OF  FUEL     ,2H
                       CO   GRAMS/KG OF  FUEL     b."'
                       CO?  GRAMS/KG OF  FUEL    3158
                       NOX  GRAMS/KG OF  FUEL    7.71
                       SO?  GRAMS/KG OF  FUEL    0.00
18.b/ 2
  n
Ib.b/ 2
  17
b7.8/13
  bb
 ?.5/13
   ?
Hl.V 2
l.B»
 ?.?/ ?
 .08
51.5/ 2
51.5
 1.7V 8
 1.7
   H
  bl
1.77
50.0
0.0
 .52
                                       b833.«b
                                         Ib.bt
                                          0.00
                              .02 (   .OH)
                              .bl (  1.10)
                              313 (   50*)
                              ,7b (  1.23)
                             0.00 (  0.00)

                             HC  GRAMS/MIN
                             co  GRAMS/MIN
                             C02 GRAMS/MIN
                             NOX GRAMS/MIN
                             so? GRAMS/MIN
                                               .0?
                                                .b
                                               21H
                                               .72
                                              0.00
                       CARBON BALANCE  FUEL  FCONOMY L/100KM (MILES/GALLON)
                                                     13.HI ( 17.55)

-------
       TABLE
                     tXHAUST EMISSIONS FROM SINGLE  BAG  SAMPLE
                           VEHICLE NUMBER EM8
DATE  t'/ 3/'78               IIME    -U MRS.         TEST  NO.   2
MOOEL  1H77 FURY  PLY        3ET-7                   ENGINE  5.1 LlTREO
RUN DURATION    23.58  M1N.   DISTANCE DRIVEN  31.88  KILOMETRES
CVS BLUHER TEST VOL.   241.75 ACT. CLI. METRES
3ULFATL DATA

 FJLTEtf 110.
 SAMPLfc VOL. CU.  FT.
 SAMPLE TEMP. DEG.  F
 SAMPLE AREA su.  IN.
 DILUTION FACTOR
 STAND. r/EN. MICROG/ML
 STAND. AREA SU.  IN.
 SO^/MICROU/FILTE*

SULFUR DICXIuE  DATA
 SAMPl.t Vut..  CU.  FT.
 SAMPLE TEMP.  DEU.  F
 AREA,HUPBLER  1
 OIL. FACT.,HUbBLER 1
 OIL. FACT., BUBBLER 3
 STAND.  OEN.  MICROG/ML
 STAND.  AfiEA,SU.  IN.
 S02, MlLLlL/bUbbLER  1
 S02, MILLIG/BUBBLER  2
 soe, PPM

SULFATt  AND  SOS  EMISSIONS
                            SAMPLE
                          47FH-2881
                             lb.00
                                71
                          H8388.00
                                 1
                              s.oo
                         m3H78.00
                            Ib.8b3
                             1.00
                               7U
                             0.00
                                1
                             0.00
                                1
                             1.L10
                             1.00
                            0.000
                            0.000
                              0.0
NFT SULFATE, MILLIGRAM/TEST
NFT H2S01, MILLIGRAM/TEST
NET sop,GP-AH/TFsr
NET SULFAFE, MILLIGRAM/KILOMETRE
NET He.SliH .MILLIGRAM/KILOMETRE
NET SOa,OHAM/KlLOhETRE
SULFUR BALANCE
 FUEL «!.,  2173  UKAMS
            SULFUH,GRAMS
            PCT.  HECOVERY
                                       10.b28
                                       10.851
                                        o.ooo
                                        0.000
                                                  BACKGROUND
                                                      1.00
                                                        7(1
                                                      O.UO
                                                         1
                                                      1.00
                                                      1.00
                            ,b7
                                    o.ono
                                     o.oo
                                                       0.000
                                                        1.00
                                                          70
                                                        0.00
                                                           1
                                                        0.00
                                                           1
                                                        1.00
                                                        1.00
                                                       0.000
                                                       0.000
                                                         0.0
                          SULFUR IN FUEL,  .0310 PCT.
                           FUEL       S05       HPSOH
                                                .0035
                                                   .53
SO? t H5SOH

    .0035
      .53

-------
                            TABLE
                    EXHAUST EMISSIONS FROM SINGLE BAG SAMPLE
                          VEHICLE NUMBER EM8
W
I
                    DATE   ?/  3/7B
                    MODEL   1977 FURY PLYMOUTH
                    DRIVER    RP
                    WET BULB  TEMP   u c
                    SPEC,  HUM.   i».o GRAM/KG
                    DISTANCE   lb.
                                   METER READING/SCALE
                                   PPM
                           BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
                           BACKGRD PPM
                           SAMPLE  METER READING/SCALE
                           SAMPLE  PPM
                           BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
  BAG RESULTS
   HC  SAMPLE
   HC  SAMPLE
   HC
   HC
   CO
   CO
   CO
   CO  BACKGRD PPM
   co? SAMPLE  METER READING/SCALE
   C02 SAMPLE  PERCENT
   CO* BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
   C02 BACKGRD PERCENT
   NOX SAMPLF  METER READING/SCALE
   NOX SAMPLE  PPM
   NOX BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
   NOX BACKGRD PPM
   HC  CONCENTRATION PPM
   CO  CONCENTRATION PPM
   COZ CONCENTRATION PCT
   NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
   802 COCENTRATION PPM
   HC  MASS (GRAMS)
   CO  MASS (GRAMS)
   CO? MASS (GRAMS)
   NOX MASS (GRAMS)
   S02 MASS (GRAMS)

HC  GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
CO  GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
C02 GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
                                                      .02  (
                                                      ,3b  (
                    NOX GRAMS/KM
                    SO? GRAMS/KM  (GRAMS/MILE)

                    HC  GRAMS/KG  OF FUEL     .PI
                    CO  GRAMS/KG  OF FUEL     "».?
                    C02 GRAMS/KG  OF FUEL   31b?
                    NOX GRAMS/KG  OF FUEL   «*.H?
                    so? GRAMS/KG  OF FUEL   o.oo
                                 .81 (
                                0.00 (
     lb.0/ 2
       Ib
     13.8/ 2
       1"»
     51.2/13
       H9
      2,vi3
        3

     2.20
      2.2/ 2
      .08
     75.9/ 2
     75.9
      2.1/ 2
      2.1
        H
       HH
                                                                 0.0
                                                                   .30
  *50b.72
    13. »3
     0.00


 .03)
 .58)
 •»*0)
1.31)
0.00)
                                HC  GRAMS/MIN    .0?
                                CO  GRAMS/MIN     .5
                                C02 GRAMS/MIN    353
                                NOX GRAMS/MIN   i.os
                                so? GRAMS/MIN   o.no
                    CARBON BALANCE FUEL ECONOMY L/100KM  (MILES/GALLON)
                                                              ( ?0.1?)

-------
                                     TARLE
     UNIT NO.
     VEHICLE MODEL
      TEST NO. 1
FURY PLYMOUTH
              VEHICLE EMISSION RESULTS
      L975  LIGHT DUTY EMISSIONS TEST
DATE  P./ b/7R                     MFGR. CODE
ENGINE   5.90 LITRE B             CURR WT.
-0
0 KG
YR,  1977
GVM     0 KG
     BAROMETER 7«7.'5? MM OF HG.
     DRY BULB TEMP.   ?s.n PFG. C
     REU. HUMIDITY     IB PCT.

     EXHAUST EMISSIONS

          BLOWER DIP. PRESS., ce, 71*9.3 MM.
          BAG RESULTS
H
 I
U)
                        H?0
BAG NO.
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
HC SAMPLE METFR
HC SAMPLE PPM
HC BACKGRD METER
HC flACKGRO PPM
co SAMPLE METER
CO SAMPLE PPM
co BACKGRI? METER
CO BACKGPD PPM
co2 SAMPLE MFTER


READING/SCALE

READING/SCALE

READING/SCALE

READING/SCALE

READING/SCALE
C02 SAMPLE PERCENT
CO? 8ACKGRD METER
READING/SCALE
C02 BACKGRD PERCENT
NOX SAMPLE METFR
NOX SAMPLE PPM
NOX BACKGHO METFH
NOX BACKGRD PPM
soa SAMPLE METER
S02 SAMPLE PPM
so? BACKGRO METER
S02 BACKGRD PPM
HC CONCENTRATION
CO CONCENTRATION
CO? CONCENTRATION
NOX CONCENTRATION
SO? CONCENTRATION
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
CO? MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
so? MASS GRAMS
WEIGHTED MASS HC
WEIGHTED MASS CO
WEIGHTED MASS CO?
WEIGHTED MASS NOX
WEIGHTED MASS so?
READING/SCALE

READING/SCALE

READING/SCALE

READING/SCALE

PPM
PPM
PCT
PPM
PPM


1
«*0531
11.1/3
111
1.5/3
15
86. I/*
H29
1.2/*
H
9<5,b/3
1,80
H.3/3
.07
HO.?/?
<*0.2
.8/2
.8
-O.O/*
•»0.0
-O.O/*
-0.0
98
109
l.'H
39.5
0.0
»,30
Bb.lR
?«»31.Sb


.19 GRAMS/KILOMETRE
2.01* GRAMS/KILOMETRE
«»03.bl GRAMS/KILOMETRE
.t.3 GRAMS/KILOMETRE
0.00 GRAMS/KILOMETRE
"».b5
0.00





                                                       WET BULB  TEMP   12,2  DEG.  C
                                                        ABS. HUMIDITY    3.1,  GRAMS/KG
                             BLOWER INLET PRESS., Gl 7*9.3 MM. H80
                             BLOWER INLET TEMP,   tH DEG. C
                                                                       b9SbO
                                                                        is.*/?
                                                                          is
                                                                        13,3/2
                                                                          13
                                                                        38. 3/*
                                                                          3b
                                                                         ?.b/*
                                                                           3
                                                   1.15
                                                    H.l/3
                                                    ,0b
                                                   15,3/2
                                                   15.3
                                                     .7/2
                                                     .">
                                                   -o.o/*
                                                   •0,0
                                                   -0,0/*
                                                   -0,0

                                                      3
                                                     33
                                                   1.09
                                                   14,7
                                                    0,0
                                                    .a*
                                                   s.oo
                                                                       2.9b
                                                                       0.00
                                                                     19.1/2
                                                                       19
                                                                     13.1/2
                                                                       13
                                                                     8b,3/*
                                                                       8b
                                             2
                                          BH.f/3
                                          l.Sb
                                           3.H/3
                                           .05
                                          39.H/2
                                          39, H
                                            .8/2
                                            .8
                                          -O.O/*
                                          -0,0
                                          -O.O/*
                                          -0,0

                                             8
                                            81
                                          1.58
                                          38.7
                                           0.0
                                           .33
                                          7,22
                                       812H.09
                                          f.57
                                          0.00
          FUEL ECONOMY BY CARBON BALANCE s   5.8  KILOMETRE/LITRE

-------
                                   T A B L f
                                                FXHAUST EMISSIONS  FROM SINGLE HAG  SAMPLE
                                                       VI-HICLE NUMBER  EM8
                           D Aft
                           MOnf.L
                                 f.t
                                   V\T }  HJRY PLYMOUTH
                           DRIVER    HP
                           HFT riULtt  Tb'IP  )^ L
                           SPl-C. HUH.'   S.ii GKAM/KG
     TIMt     -IJ HRS.
     SEI-7
     IEST I,T.   2iiHi KG.
     URY rtULH  TEMP  21* C
     bAKU.   7*b.S MM  HG.
                                                   TEST  NO.   2
                                                   ENGINE  s.s LITREV  a
                                                   GVW     o  KG
                                                   REL.  HUM.   85.8 PCT
                                                   MEASURED  FUEL  O.OU  KG
                             »•*
                                                              HSU
                                                          MM.
                                                          MM
                                                          UfcG. C
W
 I
HAG RESULTS
HC
MC
MC
ML
CO
cu
CO
co
CO?
civ
CD5
CO?
NUX
NOX
NOX
NOX
HC
CO
coe
NOX
soe
hC
CO
CO?
NOX
S08
SAKPLt METtK
S A K P L E PHN
H A C K S M I) METER
HACM;RU PPM
SAMPLE MhIEK
SAKPLt PPM
hACKURO rtfcTER
HACKGRl) PPM
SAMPLt MLTFrt
HEAUING/SCALE

READING/SCALE

REAUING/SCALE

WKAUING/SCALE

KtAOING/SCALE
SAKPLE PERCENT
HACKGRl) MtlEH
we AUING/SCALE
rtACKGHO Pr-IKCENT
SArlPLt itFTER
SAMPLE PP^i
HACKGRU ME TEH
HACKGRO PPM
CONCENTHAT ION
CONCENTRATION
CONCENTRATION
CONCENTRATION
COCENTRA f ION
MASS (GHAMSJ
MASS (GRAMS)
MASS (GKAMS)
MASS (GRAMS)
MASS (GKAMS)
REAUING/SCALE

Rf AUING/SCALE

PPM
PPM
PCT
PPM
PPM





                           HC   GRAMS/MLOMFTRE       .03
                           CO   GRAflS/MLOMETRE       .b5
                           CO?  GUAMS/KILUritTKE   318
                           NOX  GRAMS/KILOMF:TRE       .HD
                           SO?  GHAMS/MLOME IK'E     0.00
                                                                             15
                                                                             11
                                                                           bb.3/*
                                                                             bM
                                                                            3.b/*
                                                                              f
                                                                           fS.5/2
                                                                           1.87
                                                                            1.5/2
                                                                            .115
                                                                           52.1
                                                                             .b/2
                                                                             .h
                                                                              5
                                                                             5<1
                                                                           1.R2
                                                                           52. H
                                                                           D.tl
                                                                            .58
                                                                           *. 35
                                                                          17.75
                                                                           0.00
HC
CO
CO?
NOX
so?
GRAMS/KG
GH;AMS/KG
GRAMS/Kf,
G R 4 M S / is I.
GRAMS/KG
OF
OF
OF
OF
Of
FUEL
FUFL
F U [-. L
FUf L
FUEL
.?b
b.t
31 58
7. S3
n . n o
                          CARBON BALANCE  FUtL ECONOMY  =
          HC   GRAMS/MIN     ,U3
          CO   GRAMS/MIN      ,b
          CO?  GRAMS/MIN     sut
          NOX  GKAMS/MIN     ,7b
          S02  GRAMS/MIN    O.OU
          13.b8  LITRES PER  HUNDRED KILOMETERS

-------
                               TABLE
                                            EXHAU3T EMISSIONS  FROM SINGLE BAG SAMPLE
                                                  VEHICLE  NUMBER  EMH
1
00
LO
                        DATE   H/  h/7H               TIME     -U  HRS.         TEST NO.  2
                        MODEL   1H77 FURY PLYMOUTH   3ET-7                   ENGINE 5.H LITREO
                        RUN  DURATION   H3.e? MIN.   DISTANCE  DRIVEN   23.a5 KILOMETRES
                        CVS  BLUWl'K TEST VUL.  aSU.51 ACT. CU.  METRES
SULFATE DATA

 FTLTtK NO.
 SAMPLt VOL. CU. FT.
 SAMPLE TEMP. DEG.  F
 SAMPLE AREA SU. IN.
 DILUTION FACTOR
 STAND. DEN. MICROG/ML
 STAND. AREA SO. IN.     It
 Sot,MiCROG/FILTER

SULFUR DIOXIDE  DATA

 SAMPLE VOL. cu. FT.
 SAMPLE TEMP. OEG.  F
 AREA,hufJBLER 1
 DIL. FACT.,BUBBLER 1
 AREA,BUBBLER a
 DIL. FACT.,BUBBLER a
 STAND. OEN. MICROG/ML
 STAND. AREA,SU. IN.
 SOa, MILLlG/tlUBFiLER  1
 SOe, MILLIG/BUBbLER  a
 soa, PPM

SULFATE AND Sua  EMISSIONS
                                                   SAMPLE
                                                 17FH-2887
                                                    IS.BI
                                                        81
                                                 35bl7.00
                                                         1
                                                     5.00
   i.oo
     711
   0.00
      1
   0.00
      1
   1.00
   i.oo
  0.000
  11.1(00
    o.o
                         NET SULFATE, MILLIGRAM/TEST
                         NET HeSOH, MILLIGRAM/TEST
                         NET SOP, GRAM/ TEST
                         NET SULFATE, MILLIGRAM/KILOMETRE
                         NET HaSOl , MILLIGRAM/KILOMETRE
                         NET SUa,GHAM/KILOhET«E
             7.S18
             e.ont
             0.000
              ,35h
              ,3b3
             0.000
                        BACKGROUND
                             1.00
                               70
                             0..00
                                1
                             1.00
                             I .00
                            0.000
 1.00
   70
 0.00
    1
 0.00
    1
 1.00
 1.00
0.000
0.000
  0.0
                        SULFUR BALANCE
                         FUEL *T., aa37 GRAi-IS
                                   SULFUR. UKAMS
                                   PCT. RECOVERY
SULFUR IN FUEL,
 FUEL      SOa
                                           .0310 PCT.
                                                HaSOH
          u . n o o
           o . n u
                                                .ouab
                                                  .38
     SO? + H2SOt

         .uoab
           .38

-------
                                           EXHAUST  EMISSIONS FROM SINGLE  HAG  SAMPLE
                                                 VEHICLE NUMBER EMS
                      DATE  2/ ^/7R
                      MODEL   1177 FURY  PLYMOUTH
                      URJVFR   HP
                      "ET HIJI.H TEMP   |b  C
                      SPEC . HUH.   b. 1  GKAM/KG
                            TIME    -0  HHS.
                            FET
                            1EST WT.  2(1*1  KG.
                            DRY BULB  TEMP   2b  C
                            OANU.   7Hb.S MM  HG.
                                                TEST NO.   3
                                                ENGINE  5.9 LITREV  8
                                                GVW     0  KG
                                                *EL. HUM.  28.4  PCT
                                                MEASURED  FUEL   0.00 KG
                        RUN DUKATION
                        BLOWER INLEI PRESS.
                        BLOWER DIF.  PRESS.
                               INLET 1EMP.
                               VULUIIONS
                        BLOwER REVOLUTIONS
                        BlUwEH CU. CM /HEV.   2227
                        12.7b MINUTES
                       73h.h  MM. H 2 0
                       73b.b  MM  H20
                          *2  DEG. C
i
u>
                                     MtTEH  K'hAUING/SCALE
                                     PPM
                             HACKGHU METtR  RfcAD ING/SLALE
                             tiACKGRl) PPM
                             SAMPLE  METFR  KEADINU/SCALE
                             SAMPLE  PPM
                             UACKGKD MtTER  RtADING/SCALE
   HAG  HKSULT3
    HC   SAKPLF
    HC   SAKfLE
    HC
    HC
    CO
    CO
    CO
    CO   riACKGRD PPM
    CO?  SAMPLE  ME TEH HEADING/SCALE
    CU£  SAMPLE  PERCENT
    C05  HACKRHU ME TEH RFAOING/SCALE
    COS  HACKGHO PtHCENT
                METER READING/SCALE
                PPM
    NOX  BACKGKD MtTEK READING/SCALE
    NIJX  BACKGRO PPM
    HC   CDNCENTHA 1 ION PPM
    CO   CllNtENTKAl ION PPM
    COS  CONCENTRATION PCT
    NOX  CONCENTRATION PPM
    SOS  CnCENTRAlION PPM
        MASS  (UKAMSj
        MASS  (GRAMS)
NOX SAC.PLE
NOX SAMPLE
                         HC
                         CO
   COS MASS  (GRAMS)
   NOX MASS  (GRAMS)
   SOS MASS  (GRAMS)

HC  GKAri.'5/KIUOME IKt
CD  M^AMS/KILOMETRE
CO? GKAM-S/KILOKEThE
NUX GKAMS/KILOME THE
SOS GrtAMS/RILOME TKE
                                                ,3b
                                            S7?
                                                .87
                                              N.UO
   1H.7/S
     15
   11.9/3
     IS
   51.O/*
     H9
    1.8/*
      2
   H9.0/S
   3.S3
    1.9/3
    .07
   7B.O/3
   7b.O
    1.0/2
    1.0
      5
     HS
   3.17
   75.2
   0.0
    .32
   b.02
tb!9.39
  IH.tf
   0.00
                      HC   GRAKS/KG OF FULL
                      co   GRAMS/KG OF FUEL
                      CUP.  GRAMS/KG OF FUE.L
                      NOX  GHAMS/KG OF FUfcL   9.B9
                      SOS  GKAMS/RG OF FUEL   l'..i)n
                      CARBON  BALANCE FUEL t CON LIMY
                                 HC  GRAMS/MIN     .03
                                 CO  GRAMS/MIN      .5
                                 C02 GRAMS/MIN     3b2
                                 NOX GRAMS/MIN    1.13
                                 sos GRAMS/MIN    o.ou
                                 11.88 LITRES PER HUNDRED KILOMETERS

-------
UNIT NO.    fl
VEHICLE MODEL
      TEST NO. J
PLYMOUTH FUHY
                                TAtiLF                    VEHICLE EMISSION RESULTS
                                                1175  LIGHT DUTY EMISSIONS TEST
                                          RATE  ?/?7/7B                     MFGR. CODE
                                          ENGINE   5.10 LITRE 8             CURB WT.
-0
0 KG
YR.  117?
GVM     U KG
BAROMETER 737.11 MM OF  HG.
DRY HULH TEMP.   ?5.H DKG.  C
REL. HUMIDITY     4h PCT.

EXHAUST EMISSIONS

     BLOWER (HF. PRtSS.,  GS,  73b.b  MM.  H?0
     HAG RESULTS
     BAG NO.
     BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
HC
HC
HC
HC
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO?
CO?
CO?
CO?
NOX
NOX
H HOX
1 HOX
$ SO?
SO?
so?
so?
HC
CO
CO?
NUX
SO?
HC
CO
CO?
NOX
SO?
SAMPLE METER
SAMPLE PPM
HACKGKO MFTER
BACKGRD PPM
SAMPLF METER
SAMPLE PPM
liACKGRD METER
BACKGRD PPM
SAMPLE METER
Kh APING/SCALE

READING/SCALE

RFADINU/SCALE

READING/SCALE

READING/SCALE
SAMPLE PERCENT
HACKGKD METER
READING/SCALE
BACKGRD PERCENT
SAMPLE MFTER
SAMPLE PFM
BACKGRD MhTER
BACKGRD PPM
SAMPLE MF.TER
SAMPLE PPM
BACKGRU Mt.TfcR
BACKGhD PPM
CONCENTRA1 ION
CONCENTRATION
CONCENTRATION
CONCENTRATION
CONCENTRATION
MASS GRAMS
MASS GRAMS
MASS GRAMS
MASS GRAMS
MASS GRAMS
READING/SCALE

READING/SCALE

Rt ADING/SCALE

READING/SCALE

PPM
PPM
PCT
PPM
PPM





                                                  1 1.8/3
                                                   118
                                                   1.2/3
                                                    12
                                                  17.I/*
                                                   511)
                                                   l.l/*
                                                     3
                                                  4?.b/2
                                                  1.88
                                                   1.8/2
                                                   .07
                                                  41.4/2
                                                  41.4
                                                    .1/2
                                                    .1
                                                  -n.o/*
                                                  -o.o
                                                  -n.n/*
                                                  -n.o

                                                   108
                                                   4S1
                                                  1.82
                                                  48.b
                                                   n.n
                                                  4.b1
                                                 42.27
                                               ?524.bO
                                                  b. 70
                                                  (1.01)
     WEIGHTED  MASS  HC
     WEIGHTFD  MASS  CO
     WEIGHTED  MASS  CO?
     WEIGHTED  MASS  NOX
     WEIGHTED  MASS  so?
              .22  GkAMS/KILOMETRE
            a.bb  GRAMS/KILOMETRE
          427.b8  GRAMS/KILOMETRE
              .1.1  GRAMS/KILOMETRE
            II.(in  GkAMS/KILOMFTRE
                                                                       WET BULB TEMP   17.2  DEG.  C
                                                                        ABS. HUMIDITY    9.3  GRAMS/KG
                                                                       BLOWER INLET PRESS.,  Gl  73b.b  MM.  H20
                                                                       BLOWER INLET TEMP.    42  DEG. C
                                                                     2
                                                                  b1S18
                                                                   13.1/2
                                                                     It
                                                                   10.b/2
                                                                     11
                                                                   57. h/*
                                                                     55
                                                                    4.0/*
                                                                      4
                                                                   b8. 8/3
                                                                   1.24
                                                                    4.2/3
                                                                    .Ob
                                                                   18. 3/2
                                                                   18.2
                                                                     .1/2
                                                                     .1
                                                                   -o.n/*
                                                                   -o.o
                                                                   -o.o/*
                                                                   -o.o
                                                                     50
                                                                   1.18
                                                                   17. t
                                                                    0.0
                                                                    .32
                                                                   7.47
                                                                280b.02
                                                                   t.10
                                                                   0.00
                                                                       3
                                                                    fOblB
                                                                     IS. 5/2
                                                                       11
                                                                     10.2/2
                                                                       10
                                                                     bl.l/*
                                                                      137
                                                                        2
                                                                     8S.D/3
                                                                     l.bb
                                                                      3.8/3
                                                                      .Ob
                                                                     51.0/2
                                                                     51.0
                                                                       .7/2
                                                                       .7
                                                                     -O.O/*
                                                                     -0.0
                                                                     -o.o/*
                                                                     -0.0

                                                                       11
                                                                      121
                                                                     l.bl
                                                                     50.1
                                                                      0.0
                                                                      .tb
                                                                    11.31
                                                                  222b.se
                                                                     b.«H
                                                                     0.00
     FUEL ECONOMY  HY  CAMJDN  BALANCE =   5. "•  KILOMETRE/LITRE

-------
        TABLE
                  tXHAUST EMISSIONS FROM SINGLE BAG SAMPLE
                        VEHICLE NUMBER EHB
DATE  ?/?7/78
MODEL   1177 PLYMOUTH  FURY
DPIVtR   BP
WF.T 8ULH TEMP   IB  C
SPFC. HUM.  in.2 GRAM/KG
DISIANLF  21.8b5 KM
                         TIME    -0 HRS.
                         SET-7
                         TEST WT.  20H1 KG.
                         DRY BULB TEMP  ?>» C
                         8ARO.  738.» MM  HG.
                            TEST NO.  2
                            ENGINE 5.9 LlTREV fl
                            GVW    0 KG
                            REL. HUM.  52.0 PCT
                            MEASURED FUEL  o.ou KG
                           FUEL 738.2 G/LITRE   FUEL HC  RATIO  l.BbO
  RUN DURATION
  RLUWtR  INLET PRESS.
  BLUWLR  D1F.  PRESS.
  RLHWFR  INLET TEMP.
  OYNO REVOLUTIONS
  BLOWER  REVOLUTIONS
  BLOWER  CU. CM  /KFV.
 23. b? MINUTES
  73b.b  MM. H20
  ?3b.b  MM  H20
   H5  DEG. C
3177b
 H2bb9
 2235
                                „
                               '
               METER  READING/SCALE
               PPM
       BACKGRD MFTER  READING/SCALE
       BACKGRO PPM
       SAMPLE  MFTER  READING/SCALE
       SAMPLE  PPM
       HACKGRD MF.IEH  READING/SCALE
   CO? SAMPLE
RAG RESULTS
 HC  SAMPLE
 HC  SAMPLE
 HC
 HC
 CO
 CO
 CO
 CO  BACKGRD PPM
 C02 SAMPLE  MFTER READING/SCALE
             PeKCF_NT
     fiACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
 CCI? BACKGRD PFRCENT
 NOX SAMPLE  MFTER READING/SCALE
 NOX SAMPLF.  PPM
 NOX BACKGRD MF.TER READING/SCALE
 NOX BACKGRD PPM
     CONCENTRATION PPM
     CONCENTRATION PPM
 COS CONCENTRATION PCT
 NOX CONCENTRAT ION PPM
 SO? COCENTRATJON PPM
     MASS (GRAMS)
     MASS (GRAMS)
   HC
   CO
   HC
   CO
   CO? MASS  (GHAMS)
   NOX MASS  (GRAMS)
   SO? MASS  (GRAMS)

HC  GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
CO  GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
CO? GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
NOX GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
SO? GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)

HC  GHAHS/KG OF FUEL     .32
CO  GRAMS/KG OF FUEL    13.2
CO? GRAMS/KG OF FUF_L    31HB
NOX GRAMS/KG OF FUEL  1(1.79
SO? GWAMS/KG OF FUEL    0.00
     'N BALANCE FUEL ECONOMY L/10OKM  (MILES/GALLON)

TOTAL CVS FLOM=   8(iq.lSTD. CU. METRES

LE

iLE

iLE

,LE

;LE

iLE

iLE











.03
1.3H
320
1.10
u.uo
HC
CO
CO?
NOX
so?
15
10. 3/ 2
10
S7.b/12
128
.H/12
1
12. 7/ Z
1.88
1.7/ 2
.Ob
bl.8/ 2
bl.B
.9/ 2
.9
b
181
1.83
bl.O
0.0
.72
29.39
b995.80
23.99
0.1)0
C .05)
( 2.1b)
( 515)
C 1.77)
( 0.00)
GRAMS/MIN .03
GRAMS/MIN 1.2
GRAMS/MIN gqb
GRAMS/MIN i.ui
GRAMS/MIN o.oti
                                                       13.75  (  17.11)

-------
                                  TABU.
 I
CO
                                               tXHAIIST  EMISSIONS FROM SINGLE  BAG  SAMPLE
                                                      VEHICLE  NUMBER EMB
                          DATF   Z/r.7/7«               TIME     -II MRS.         TEST  NO.   S
                          MODEL   1177 PLYMOUTH FURY   SET-?                   ENGINE 5.9 LITREO
                          RON  DURATION   83.h7 M1N.   DISTANCE  DRIVEN  S1.7H  KILOMETRES
                          CVS  ULOUf H TEST VOL.  c?SJ.8t  ACT.  CU. METRES
                                                       SAMPLE
                                                     >»7FH-28HS
                                                           81
                                                           OU
                                                            1
                                                           tKI
                                                           tlU
SULFAft. DATA

 FFLIEK NO.
 SAMPLE VOL.  CO.  FT.         lb
 SAMPLE TEMP.  DEL..  F
 SAMPLE ARM  SO.  IN.      SSflb
 OILlUIOH  FACTOR
 STAND. DEN.  MICROG/ML       5
 STAND. AREA  SU.  IN.     155M02
 SOt, MICfU;r,/FILTER          l?.btl

SULf-UK DIOXIDE DATA

 SAMPLE VOL..  cu.  FT.          i.oo
 SAMPLE TEMP.  DEC.  f             70
 AREA,KUHBLER  i              o.oo
 DJL. FAC r.,b
-------
                                               I-XHAUST EMISSIONS  FROM SINGLE BAG  SAMPLE
                                                     VEHICLE NUMBER  EMS
                         I) A It   rVf7/7H
                         MODEL   1*7?  PLYMOUTH  FUKY
                         UW]VEi<    HP
                         HE r HUI.H  TEMP  in C
                         SP|C.  HUM.   10.7 GWAIi/KG
      ITME     -U HRS.
      FET
      TEST  WT.   2(1*1 KG.
      DRY HULb  TEMP  25 C
      BAKU.   738.* MM  HG.
TEST NO.   3
ENGINE 5.9  LITREV B
GVW    11  KG
REL. HUM.   52.b PCT
MEASURED  FUEL  0.00 K«
                           PUN  IHIKA1ION          I?.7H MINUTES
                           HLUKEW  INLET PRESS,  vst.h  MM. H?O
                           HLU-/KK  OIF.   PRFSS.  73b.b  MM  H20
                           HLU-tR  INLET TH'iP.
                           DYNU  HI.VOLUTIONS
                           «L(MER  REVOLUTIONS
                           RLU'ltR  CU.  CM /KEV.
   «*3
23535
       DEG.  C
w
 I
Ul
CD
At, HE .'HILTS
HL
HC
HI.
HC
CO
CO
Co
CU
CU?
CO?
Co?
CU2
NUX
NUX
NUX
NUX
HC
cu
CU?
NUX
su?
HC
CU
CU?
NUX
SU?
SAMPLE MKTEH
SAMPLE PPM
BACKGRU HFTER
HACKGRD PPM
SAMPLE MKTER
SAMPLE PPM
BACKGRl) MtTER
HACKGRO PPM
SAMPLE MH TEW
SAMPLE PFRCE
HACKGRD Mf.TER
READING/SCALE

READING/SCALE

READING/SCALE

READING/SCALE

READING/SCALE
NT
READING/SCALE
HACKGHD PERCENT
SAMPLE METER
SAMPLE PPM
MCKGRD METER
HACKGHD PPM
CONCENTRATION
CONCENTRATION
CONCENTRAT Il)W
CUNCEN1KA f ION
COCENTRAT10N
MASS (GRAMS)
MASS (GRAMS)
MASS (GKAMS)
MASS (GRAMS)
MASS (GRAMS)
READING/SCALE

READING/SCALE

PPM
PPM
PCI
PPM
PPM





                                                                           It
                                                                         1U.1/2
                                                                           10
                          151
                           .?/*
                            1
                         50.9/2
                         2.33
                          l.b/2
                          .Ub
                         H5.B/2
                         85.8
                          1.0/2
                          1.0
                            b
                          112
                         2.29
                         85.0
                         tl.O
                          .39
                       1*.89
                     1792.07
                       18.51
                         O.UO
HC
CO
COP
NOX
Su?
HC
CO
CU?
MUM
SU?
GRAMT./KlLOME TRE
UKAMS/MLUMETRF
Gl'AMS/KILOHETKE
UHAhS/KILOMETRK
GRAMS/KILOMF.TRF
i, RAMS/KG OF FUEL
URAMS/KG OF FUEL
GI'AMS/KG OF FUEL
UKAMS/ivG OF FUEL
UHAMS/i^G OF FUFL
.02
.90
t?91
1 .12
n.no
.25
H.8
3153
J ?. IR
n .on
                                                           HC  GRAMS/MIN    .03
                                                           CO  GRAMS/MIN    1.2
                                                           C02 GRAMS/MIN    37b
                                                           NOX GRAMS/MIN   j.ifs
                                                           302 GRAMS/MIN   n.OU
                                BALANCE  FUEL tCl'NuMY  =   12.*9 LITRES PER HUNDRED  KILOMETERS

-------
    UNIT NO.  FMfi
    VEHICLE MODEL
      TEST NO. 1
FURY PLY
    BAROMETER 7H2.1S MM OF  HG.
    DRY BULB TEMP.   2b.l DEG.  C
    REL. HUMIDITY     50 PCT.

    EXHAUST EMISSIONS
M
I
OJ
BLOWER DIF. PRESS., G2, 7"*1.3 MM. H20
BAG RESULTS
RAG NO.
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
HC SAMPLE METER READING/SCALE
HC SAMPLE PPM
HC BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
HC BACKGRD PPM
CO SAMPLE METER READING/SCALE
CO SAMPLE PPM
CO BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
CO BACKGRD PPM
C02 SAMPLE METER READING/SCALE
C02 SAMPLE PERCENT
C02 BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
C02 BACKGRD PERCENT
NOX SAMPLE METER READING/SCALE
NOX SAMPLE PPM
NOX BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
NOX BACKGRD PPM
302 SAMPLE METER READING/SCALE
802 SAMPLE PPM
S02 SACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
S02 BACKGRD PPM
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
CO? CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
S02 CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS


J
H0703
12.b/3
12b
l.b/3
Ib
23.8/3
550
.1/3
2
H2.1/2
1.85
l.S/2
.05
27.b/2
27. b
.V2
.1
-O.O/*
0.0
-o.o/*
n.o
112
520
1.80
2b.8
0.0
*.12
tb.02
C02 MASS GRAMS 2520.2'*
NOX MASS GRAMS
S02 MASS GRAMS
WEIGHTED MASS HC .31 GRAMS/KILOMETRE
WEIGHTED MASS co 2.0? GRAMS/KILOMETRE
WEIGHTED MASS C02 H17.H7 GRAMS/KILOMETRE
WEIGHTED MASS NOX .51 GRAMS/KILOMETRE
WEIGHTED MASS 302 0.00 GRAMS/KILOMETRE
3.12
0.00





TABLE                   VEHICLE EMISSION RESULTS
                1175  LIGHT DUTY EMISSIONS TEST
          DATE  H/ 7/78                     MFGR. CODE   -0                  Y*.
          ENGINE   5.90 LITRE B             CURB Wl.     0 KG                GVM

                                       WEI BULB TEMP  18.9 DEC. C
                                        ABS. HUMIDITY  10.B GRAMS/KG
                                                                           BLOWER INLET PRESS., Gl 7*1.3 MM. H20
                                                                           BLOWER INLET TEMP.   ta DEG. c
117?
   0 KG
                                                                         2
                                                                      bltlt
                                                                       lb.3/2
                                                                         Ib
                                                                       15.5/2
                                                                         15
                                                                       23. 8/*
                                                                         23
                                                                        3.5/*
                                                                          3
                                                                       b?.3/3
                                                                       1.21
                                                     .07
                                                    11.8/2
                                                    11.8
                                                     1.0/2
                                                     1.0
                                                    -O.I)/*
                                                     0.0
                                                    -o.o/*
                                                     0.0
                                                                       1.15
                                                                       10.1
                                                                        0.0
                                                                        .11
                                                                       e.ei
                                                                    2735.31
                                                                       2.71
                                                                       0.00
                                                                       3
                                                                    t071b
                                                                     11.8/2
                                                                       20
                                                                     1H.H/2
                                                      52
                                                     2.H/*
                                                       2
                                                    85.8/3
                                                    1.51
                                                     f .5/3
                                                     .07
                                                    33.1/2
                                                    33.1
                                                     1.2/2
                                                     1.2
                                                    -O.O/*
                                                     0.0
                                                    -o.o/*
                                                     0.0

                                                       7
                                                      t8
                                                    1.53
                                                    32.0
                                                     0.0
                                                     .31
                                                    *.21
                                                 2138.30
                                                    H.bB
                                                    o.no
         FUEL ECONOMY  BY  CARBON  BALANCE  =    S.b  KILOMETRE/LITRE

-------
                            TABLE
                                         EXHAUST  EMISSIONS  FROM  SINGLE  BAG  SAMPLE
                                               VEHICLE  NUMBER  EMS
M
I
                    DATE  t/  7/7H
                    MODEL   1^77 FURY PLYMOUTH
                    DRIVER    BP
                    WET RULB  TEMP  2U C
                    SPEC. HUM.  11.7 GRAM/KG
                         TIME    -0 MRS.
                         3ET-7
                         TEST WT.  2011 KG.
                         DRY BULB TEMP  28 C
                         BARO.  710.2 MM  HG.
                                               TEST NO.  2
                                               ENGINE s.i LITRE  B
                                               GVH    0 KG
                                               REL. HUM.  iB.8 PCT
                                               MEASURED FUEL  O.On KG
                      RUN DURATION
                      BLOWER  INLET PRESS.
                      BLOWER  DIF.  PRESS.
                      BLOWER  INLET TEMP.
                      DYNQ REVOLUTIONS
                      BLOWER  REVOLUTIONS
                      BLOWER  CU. CM /REV.
                     23.28 MINUTES
                    73b.b  MM. H20
                    73b.b  MM  H20
                       13  DEC. C
                    31359
                     112171
                     2228
                                   METER READING/SCALE
                                   PPM
                           BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
                           BACKGRD PPM
                           SAMPLE  METER READING/SCALE
                           SAMPLE  PPM
                           BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
RAG RESULTS
 HC  SAMPLE
 HC  SAMPLE
 HC
 HC
 CO
 CO
 CO
 CO  BACKGRD PPM
 C02 SAMPLE  METER READING/SCALE
 C02 SAMPLE  PERCENT
 C02 BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
 C02 BACKGRD PERCENT
             METER READING/SCALE
             PPM
 NOX BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
 NOX BACKGKD PPM
 HC  CONCENTRATION PPM
 CO  CONCENTRATION PPM
 CO? CONCENTRATION PCT
 NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
 302 COCENTRATION PPM
     MASS (GRAMS)
     MASS (GRAMS)
NOX SAMPLE
NOX SAMPLE
                       HC
                       CO
                       C02 MASS  (GRAMS)
                       NOX MASS  (GRAMS)
                       302 MASS  (GRAMS)

                    HC  GRAMS/KILQMETRE      .02
                    CO  GRAMS/KILOMETRE      .55
                    C02 GRAMS/KILOMETRE   313
                    NOX GRAMS/KILOMETRE      .51
                    302 GRAMS/KILOMETRE     0.00

                    HC  GRAMS/KG OF FUEL    .19
                    co  GRAMS/KG OF FUEL    s.b
                    C02 GRAMS/KG OF FUEL   31bO
                    NOX GRAMS/KG OF FUEL   5.15
                    302 GRAMS/KG OF FUEL   0.110
   11.1/2
     11
   12.8/2
     13
   51.5/*
     52
     .!/*
      0
   9b.8/3
   1.82
    1.1/3
    .Ob
   29.1/2
   2S.1
    1.2/2
    1.2
      3
     19
   1.77
   28.1
   0.0
    .10
  12.Ob
b807.11
  11.73
   0.00
                              HC  GRAMS/M1N    .OS
                              CO  GRAMS/MIN     .5
                              C02 GRAMS/MIN    295
                              NOX GRAMS/MIN    .so
                              302 GRAMS/MIN   o.OU
                    CARBON BALANCE FUEL ECONOMY =   13.12 LITRES PER HUNDRED  KILOMETERS

-------
       TABLE
                    EXHAUST EMISSIONS FROM SINGLE BAG SAMPLE
                          VEHICLE NUMBER EM8
DATE  t/ 7/78              TIME    -0 HRS.        TEST NO.  I
MODEL  1177 FURY PLYMOUTH  SET-7                  ENGINE 5.1 LITREO
RUN DURATION   23.58 MIN.  DISTANCE DRIVEN  21.7t KILOMETRES
CVS BLOWER TEST VOL.  250.hi ACT. CU. METRES
                           SAMPLE
SULFATE DATA               	

 FILTER NO.              *7FH-ai05
 SAMPLE VOL. CU. FT.        17.33
 SAMPLE TEMP. DEG. F           <«0
 SAMPLE AREA SO. IN.     ttl74.00
 DILUTION FACTOR                1
 STAND. DEN. MICROG/ML       5.00
 STAND. AREA SQ. IN.    1571b2.00
 SOt,MICROG/FILTER         IH.OSt

SULFUR DIOXIDE DATA

 SAMPLE VOL. CU. FT.         1.00
 SAMPLE TEMP. DEG. F           70
 AREA,BUBBLER 1              0.00
 OIL. FACT.,BUBBLER 1           1
 AREA,BUBBLER 2              0.00
 OIL. FACT.,BUBBLER a           1
 STAND. DEN. MICROG/ML       1.00
 STAND. AREA,SO. IN.         1.00
 302, MILLIG/BUBBLER 1      0.000
 802, MILLIG/BUBBLER a      0.000
 302, PPM                     0.0

SULFATE AND S02 EMISSIONS

 NET SULFATE,MILLIGRAM/TEST
 NET HaSOH,MILLIGRAM/TEST
 NET soa,GRAM/TEST
 NET SULFATE,MILLIGRAM/KILOMETRE
 NET H2S01,MILLIGRAM/KILOMETRE
 NET soa,GRAM/KILOMETRE
SULFUR BALANCE
 FUEL WT., 215-» GRAMS
            SULFUR,GRAMS
            PCT. RECOVERY
                                       B.02b
                                       8.lit
                                       o.ooo
                                         .3b1
                                         .377
                                       o.ooo
                                                  BACKGROUND
                                                       1.00
                                                         70
                                                       0.00
                          SULFUR IN FUEL, .0310 PCT.
                           FUEL      302
                            .b7
0.000
 0.00
                                                          1
                                                        ,00
                                                        ,00
                                                     0.000
                                                      1.00
                                                        70
                                                      0.00
                                                         1
                                                      0.00
                                                         1
                                                      1.00
                                                      1.00
                                                     0.000
                                                     0.000
                                                       0.0
                                                          soa t
.0027
  .to
                                                               .0027

-------
                              TABLE
                                           EXHAUST EMISSIONS FROM SINGLE BAG SAMPLE
                                                 VEHICLE NUMBER EM8
n
i
                       DATE  t/  7/78
                       MODEL   J^?? FURY PLYMOUTH
                       DRIVER    BP
                       WET BULB  TEMP  iq c
                       SPEC. HUM.  )l).i» GRAM/KG
                         TIME    -o MRS.
                         FET
                         TEST WT.  20M KG.
                         DRY BULB TEMP  27 C
                         BARO.  710.? MM  HG.
                            TEST NO.   3
                            ENGINE S.R LITREV 8
                            GVW    0  KG
                            REL. HUM.   fS.O PCT
                            MEASURED  FUEL  0.00 KG
                         RUN DURATION
                         BLOWER  INLET PRESS.
                         BLOWER  DIF.  PRESS.
                         BLOWER  INLRT TEMP.
                         DYNO REVOLUTIONS
                         BLOWER  REVOLUTIONS
                         HLOWER  CU. CM  /REV.
                     12.7t MINUTES
                    73b.b  MM. H20
                           MM  H20
73b.b
   f 3
83523
  b!831
 2221
                           DEC. C
BAG RESULTS
 HC  SAMPLE  METER READING/SCALE
 HC  SAMPLE  PPM
 HC  BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
 HC  BACKGRD PPM
 CO  SAMPLE  METER READING/SCALE
 CO  SAMPLE  PPM
 CO  BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
 CO  BACKGRD PPM
 CO? SAMPLE  METER READING/SCALE
 C02 SAMPLE  PERCENT
 C02 BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
 CO? BACKGRD PERCENT
 NOX SAMPLE  METER READING/SCALE
 NOX SAMPLE  PPM
 NOX BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
 NOX BACKGRD PPM
 HC  CONCENTRATION PPM
 CO  CONCENTRATION PPM
 COS CONCENTRATION PCT
 NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
 302 COCENTRATION PPM
 HC  MASS (GRAMS)
 CO  MASS (GRAMS)
 C02 MASS (GRAMS)
 NOX MASS (GRAMS)
 S02 MASS (GRAMS)
                       HC  GRAMS/KILOMETRE      .02
                       co  GRAMS/KILOMETRE      .35
                       C02 GRAMS/KILOMETRE   273
                       NOX GRAMS/KILOMETRE      .fS
                       S02 GRAMS/KILOMETRE     0.00

                       HC  GRAMS/KG OF FUEL    .23
                       CO  GRAMS/KG OF FUEL    ».l
                       C02 GRAMS/KG OF FUEL   31b2
                       NOX GRAMS/KG OF FUEL   5.b5
                       802 GHAMS/KG OF FUEL   0.00
                       IS. 2/2
                         IS
                       12.3/2
                         12
                       SO.O/*
                         t8
                        2.2/*
                          2
                       »8.0/2
                       2.17
                        l.b/2
                        .Ob
                       37.S/2
                       37. 9
                        1.3/2
                        1.3
                          5
                         »3
                       a. 12
                       3b.8
                       0.0
                        .33
                       5.71
                                                                     8.03
                                                                     0.00
                       CARBON BALANCE FUEL ECONOMY
                              HC  GRAM3/MIN    .03
                              co  GRAMS/MIN     ,s
                              002 GRAMS/MIN    353
                              NOX GRAMS/MIN    ,b3
                              302 GRAMS/MIN   o.oo
                              11.bB LITRES PER HUNDRED KILOMETERS

-------
                                       TABLE
UNIT NO.
VEHICLE
                 EMg
                           TFST NO.
                      FURY PLYMOUTH
                                                      VEHICLE EMISSION RESULTS
                                                         LIGHT DUTY EMISSIONS TEST
                                             ACTU»L DISTANCES USED IN CALCULATIONS
                                         DATE  H/ll/78                     MFGR. CODE
                                         ENGINE   5.90 LITRE 8             CURB WT,
-0
0 KG
YR.
GVM
                                                                                                                   0 KG
BAROMETER 7»n.lp MM OF HG.
DRY BULB TEMP.   ?O DEC.. C
REL. HUMIDITY     ?i PCT.

EXHAUST EMISSIONS

     BLOWER OIF. PRESS., G?, 7b?.0 MM.
     BAG RESULT*
     BAG NO'.
     BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
     HC
     HC
     HC
     HC
     CO
     CO
     CO
     CO
     CO?
     CO?
td
i
                                              H50
          SAMPLE  METER READING/SCALE
          SAMPLE  PPM
          BACKGPD METER READING/SCALE
          BACKGRD PPM
          SAMPLF  METER READING/SCALE
                  PPM
                  METER READING/SCALE
          BACKGRD PPM
          SAMPLE  METER READING/SCALE
                 SAMPLE
          SAMPLE  PERCENT
     CO?  BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
     CO?  BACKGRD PERCENT
     NOX  SAMPLE  METER READING/SCALE
     NOX  SAMPLE  PPM
     NOX  BACKGPO METER READING/SCALE
     NOX  84CKGRO PPM
     so?  SAMPLE  METER READING/SCALE
     so?  SAMPLE  PPM
     SO?  BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
     SO?  BACKGRD PPM

     HC   CONCENTRATION PPM
     CO   CONCENTRATION PPM
     CO?  CONCENTRATION PCT
     NOX  CONCENTRATION PPM
     SO?  CONCENTRATION PPM
     HC   Miss GRAM3
     CO   MASS GRAMS
     CO?  MASS GRAMS
     NOX  MASS GRAMS
     SO?  MASS GRAMS
     HC GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
     CO GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
     CO? GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
     NOX GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
     FUEL CONSUMPTION BY CB  L/IOHKM (MPG)
     CVS FLOW STD. CU. METRES (3CF)
     CALCULATED DISTANCE KM(MIUE91
      WEIGHTED FUEL
      WEIGHTED MASS
      WEIGHTED MASS
      WEIGHTED MASS
      WEIGHTED MASS
          TOTAL CVS
             CONSUMPTION LITRES/lCinKM (MPG)
             HC GRAMS/KM CGRAMS/MILE)
             CO GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
             CO* GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
             NOX GRAMS/KM CGRAMS/MILE)
             FLOW *   ?n3.? STD. cu. METRES
                                                                             WET BULB TEMP  13.1 DEG. C
                                                                              AB8. HUMIDITY   5,b GRAMS/KG
                                                                              COMMENTS  1178 FTP-C
                                                                      BLOWER INLET PRESS,,  GI  7b?.o MM.
                                                                      BLOWER INLET TEMP.    t?  DEG.  C
1
H08BO
70. 7/ t
71
8,b/ ?
1
13.5/11
1 73
.8/11
2
*8,0/ ?
1.8«f
l.b/ ?
,0b
31. b/ ?
3t ,b
.?/ e
.7
-0.0/-0
-0.0
-0.0/-0
-o.o
b3
HSO
1.71
3*.0
0.0
Z.78
31. Bb
Hll.bl
4,?1*
0.00
,*8 (
b,1S ( 11.
<»35.78 (701.
.7H ( 1.
11.13 ( 1?.
7b.l (?b8b
5,7* ( 3.
IB. So
.!»
1 »1b
HZ1.71
.bfl
g
70b11
11. B/ ?
ie
7. 1/ ?
7
?H,3/13
jj
l.H/13
1
bb.1/ 1
i.eo
3.5/ 3
.05
15. B/ 2
15.8
.-*/ ?
,i»
-0.0/-0
-0.0
-0.0/-0
-0.0
;
81
1.15
15. »
0.0
,H J
3.«3
*77b.3b
3.33
0.00
78) .07 ( ,11)
18) .S3 ( .85)
17) 451.83 (7?b.11)
11) .«» ( .8?)
30) 11.13 ( IS. 17)
.1) 131. b (tbHb.?)
5b) b.lH ( 3.8B)
( 1*.7?)
( .?7)
( 3.15)
(bll.SH)
( 1.01)
3
H0511
81. 1/ ?
11
7. a/ ?
7
bb,5/13
bS
5.2/13
5
88. 8/ 3
l.bS
»,0/ 3
,0b
Ht.O/ ?
H2.0
,t/ ?
,*
-0.0/-0
-0.0
•0.0/-0
-0.0
16
SB
l.bO
•H.b
0,0
,b4
9. Ob
??10.77
5.15
0,00
.11 ( .
.88 ( 1.
383.11 (bl7.
,81 ( 1.
Ib.Hb ( 1*.
75.5 (3bbb
S.7b ( 3.





































18)
HI)
B<0
t *)
21)
.0)
58)






-------
                            TARLE
M
 l
                    FXHAUST EMISSIONS FROM SINGLE BAG
                          VEHICLE NUMBER
                    DATE   t/n/7*
                    MODEL   1977 FURY PLYMOUTH
                    DRIVER   BP
                    WET BULB TF.wp   Ib C
                    SPEC.  HUM.   7.H GRAM/KG
                    DISTANCE  P1.500 KM
                           TIME    -0 HRS,
                           SET-7
                           TEST WT.  20H1 KG.
                           DRY BULB TEMP  2b C
                           BARO.  7*0.•» MM  HG.
                             FUEL 738.e G/LITRE
TEST NO,
ENGINE »
GVW
REL.
       0 KG
     HUM.
                     LITRfV I

                     J3.7 PCT
          MEASURED FUEL  o.oo KB
          FUEL HC  RATIO
                      RUN DURATION
                      BLOWER  INLET PRESS.
                      BLOWER  OIF'.  PRESS.
                      BLOWER  INLET TFMP,
                      DYNO REVOLUTIONS
                      BLOWER  REVOLUTIONS
                      BLOWER  CU. CM  /REV.
                       ?3.?i MINUTES
                        7b2.n  MM. H20
                        7b2.n  MM  H20
                         »3  DEC. C
                      312»b
                                   MFTER READING/SCALE
                                   PPM
                           BACKGRO METER READING/SCALE
                           BACKGRD PPM
                           SAMPLE  METER READING/SCALE
                           SAMPLE  PPM
                           BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
  BAG RESULTS
   HC  SAMPLE
   HC  SAMPLE
   HC
   HC
   CO
   CO
   CO
   CO  9ACKGRD
   coz SAMPLE  METER READING/SCALE
   C02 SAMPLF  PERCENT
   coz BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
   COt BACKGPD PERCENT
   NOX SAMPLE  METER READING/SCALE
   NOX SAMPLE  PPM
   NOX BACKGRO METER READING/SCALE
   NOX BACKGRD PPM
   HC  CONCENTRATION PPM
   CO  CONCENTRATION PPM
   COI CONCENTRATION PCT
   NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
   SO* COCENTRATION PPM
   HC  MASS (GRAMS)
   CO  MASS (GRAMS)
   CO? MASS (GRAM3)
   NOX MASS (GRAMS)
   SOZ MASS (GRAMS)

HC  GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
CO  GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
CO? GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
NOX GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
SO? GRAMS/KM (GR»MS/MILE)
     11, 7/ P
       12
      7,b/ ?
        9
     bf.S/13
       bO
      3.7/13
     1.81
      l.b/ 2
      .Ob
                                                                  1.2
                                                                    5
                                                                   SH
                                                                 1.78
                                                                 HO, 5
                                                                 0.0
                                                     .03 (
                                                     .b2 (
                                                     J17 (
                                                     ,b7 (
                                                    n.oo (
  b808.31

     o|oo

 ,05)

 510)
1.08)
0,00)
                    HC  GRAMS/KG OF FUEL    .2*
                    CO  GRAMS/KG OF FUEL    b.l
                    C02 GRAMS/KG OF FUEL   3159
                    NOX GRAMS/KG OF FUEL   b.b?
                    802 GRAMS/KG OF FUEL   O.OH
                                HC  GRAMS/MIN    ,pj
                                Co  GRAMS/MIN     ,b
                                C02 GRAMS/MIN    212
                                NOX GRAMS/MIN    ,b?
                                302 GRAMS/MIN   0,00
                    CARBON BALANCE FUEL ECONOMY L/100KM (MILES/GALLON)


                    TOTAL'CVS FLO<"I"   ?OB.bSTD. CU. METRES
                                                        13.5b ( 17.35)

-------
                       TABLE
M
 I
                                    EXHAUST  EMISSIONS FROM  SINGLE  BAG  SAMPLE
                                           VEHICLE  NUMBER EMS
                DATE  >>/ll/78               TIME    -0 HRS.         TEST  NO.   2
                MODEL  1^77 FURY PLYMOUTH   SET-7                   ENGINE  5.S LlTREO
                RUN DURATION   23.29 MIN.   DISTANCE  DRIVEN   21.7t  KILOMETRES
                CVS BLOWER TEST VOL.  2*1.87  ACT.  CU. METRES
                SUl.FATE DATA
                                            SAMPLE
 FILTER NO.              t?FH-2913
 SAMPLE VOL. CU. FT.        Ib.t2
 SAMPLE TEMP. DEG. F           as
 SAMPLE AREA SO. IN.     33190.00
 DILUTION FACTOR                1
 STAND. DEN. MICROG/ML       5.00
 STAND. AREA SQ. IN.    Ibl7b7.00
 SOt,MICROG/FILTER         10.251

SULFUR DIOXIDE DATA

 SAMPLE VOL. CU. FT.         1.00
 SAMPLE TEMP. DEG. F           TO
 AREA,BUBBLER 1              0.00
 OIL. FACT.,BUBBLER 1           1
 AREA,BUBBLER 2              0.00
 OIL. FACT.,BUBBLER 2           1
 STAND. DEN. MICROG/ML       1.00
 STAND. AREA,SQ. IN.         1.00
 S02f MILLIG/BUBBLER 1      0.000
 S02, MILLIG/BUBBLER 2      0.000
 302, PPM                     0.0

SULFATE AND S02 EMISSIONS

 NET SULFATErMILLIGRAM/TEST            b.273
 NET H2SOH,MILLIGRAM/TEST              b.tot
 NET SOS,GRAM/TEST                     0.000
 NET SULFATE,MILLIGRAM/KILOMETRE        .289
 NET H2SOH,MILLIGRAM/KILOMETRE          .295
 NET 302>GRAM/KILOMETRE                0.000
                 SULFUR  BALANCE
                  FUEL  WT.,  21b*  GRAMS
                            SULFUR,GRAMS
                            PCT.  RECOVERY
                                                  BACKGROUND
                                                                       1.00
                                                                         70
                                                                       0.00
                                                                          1
                                                                       1.00
                                                                       1.00
                                             .b7
                                    0.000
                                     0.00
                                                                      0.000
       1.00
         70
       0.00
          1
       0.00
          1
       1.00
       1.00
      0.000
      0.000
        0.0
                          SULFUR IN FUEL, .0310 PCT.
                           FUEL      S02       H2SOH
.0021
  .31
302 +.H2SOt

    .0021
      .31

-------
                             TABLE
EXHAUST EMISSIONS FROM SINGLE 840 SAMPLE
      VEHICLE NUMBER EMS
w
I
*>•
                      DATE   »/ll/?«               TIME     .0  HRS,
                      MODEL   )q»?  FURY  PLYMOUTH   FET
                      DRIVER   HP                 TEST  WT.   20*1  KG,
                      WET BULB  TfMp   11  c         DRY BULB  TEMP   2»  C
                      SPEC.  HU".    3.0  GRAM/KG    8ARO.   7HO,* MM   HO.
                      DISTANCE   lb'.?HS  KM           FUEL  738,2 G/LITRE
                              TEST NO,  3
                              ENGINE 5.1 LITREV 8
                              GVW    0 KG
                              REL, HUM,  lb,2 PCT
                              MEASURED FUEL  0.00 KG
                              FUEL HC  RATIO l.BbO
                        RUN  DURATION
                        BLOWER  INLET  PRESS.
                        BLOWER  DIF.   PRESS.
                        BLOWER  INLFT  TEMP,
                        DYNO REVOLUTIONS
                        BLOWER  REVOLUTIONS
                        BLOWER  cu. CM /REV.
   12. 7» MINUTES
    7b2.0  MM. H20
    7b2.0  MM  H20
     >»2  DEC. C
  ?3b08
   222?
BAG RESULTS

HC SAMPLF METER READING/SCALE 11
HC SAMPLE PPM

HC BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE b
HC BACKGPD PPM


,2/ 2
11
,8/ 2
7
co SAMPLF METER READING/SCALE b*.s/i3
CO SAMPLF PPM

bO
co BACKGRD METF.R READING/SCALE ».i/i3
CO BACKGRD PPM

C02 SAMPLE METER READING/SCALE »s
C02 SAMPLE PERCENT
a.
C02 BACKGRO METER READINO/SCALE i
C02 BACKGRO PERCENT
•
NOX SAMPLE METER READING/SCALP 52
NOX SAMPLE PPM
52
NOX BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
NOX BACKGRO PPM
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
802 COCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS (GRAMJ)
CO MASS (GRAMS)
C02 MASS (GRAMS)
NOX MASS (GRAMS)
SOP MASS (GRAMS)
HC GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
CO GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
C02 GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
NOX GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
SOP GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
HC GRAMS/KG OF FUEL ,2b
CO GRAMS/KG OF FUFL 5,0
CO? GRAMS/KG OF FUEL 31bl
NOX GRAMS/KG OF FUEL b.»»
so? GRAMS/KG OF FUEL o.oo



i.
52
0.
•
7.
<»»SO.
1.
o.
.02 ( .OH)
,M ( .70)
?7f ( »*!)
,5b ( .10)
0,00 C 0.00)
HC GRAMS/MIN
co GRAMS/MIN
C02 GRAMS/MIN
NOX GRAMS/MIN
so2 GRAMS/MIN
s
,0/ 2
17
.«/ 2
OS
.3/ 2
.3
,»/ 2
.»
b
S3
12
.0
0
3b
11
bl
08
00





.03
.b
3»q
.71
n.oo
                     CARBON BALANCE FUEL ECONOMY L/jnriKM
                                                                              11.73  (  20.Ob)

-------
 UNIT NO.  FIM8
 VEHICLE MODEL
                   TEST NO.
               PLY FURY
 BAROMETER 73Y.31 MM OF HG.
 DRY  BULB IEMP.    28.8 DEG. C
 KEL.  HUMIDITY     3b PCT.
             VEHICLE EMISSION RESULTS
          1R78  LIGHT DUTY EMISSIONS TEST
    ACTUAL DISTANCES USED IN CALCULATIONS
DATE  5/ 3/78                     MFGR. CODE   -0
ENGINE   5.90 LITRE 8             CURB WT.     0 KG

                             WET BULB TEMP  13.9 DEG. C
                              ABS. HUMIDITY   b.» GRAMS/KG
                              COMMENTS  1978 FTPC
YR.  1177
GVM     0 KG
                          G2, 73b.b MM. H20
EXHAUST EMISSIONS

     BLOWER OIF. PRESS.,
     BAG RESULTS
     HAG NO.
     BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
     HC   SAMPLE  METER READING/SCALE
     HC   SAMPLE  PPM
     HC   BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
     HC   BACKGRD PPM
     CO   SAMPLE  METER READING/SCALE
     CO   SAMPLE  PPM
     CO   BACKGRO METER READING/SCALE
     CO   BACKGRD PPM
     C03  SAMPLE  METER READING/SCALE
     COS  SAMPLE  PERCENT
     C02  BACKGRO METER READING/SCALE
     CO?  BACKGRD PERCENT
     NOX  SAMPLE  METER-READING/SCALE
     NOX  SAMPLE  PPM
     NOX  BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
     NOX  BACKGRD PPM
     SU2  SAMPLE  METER READING/SCALE
     SOS  SAMPLE  PPM
     SO?  BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
     SO?  BACKGRD PPM

     HC   CONCENTRATION PPM
     CO   CONCENTRATION PPM
     CO?  CONCENTRATION PCT
     NOX  CONCENTRATION PPM
     SOS  CONCENTRATION PPM
     HC   MASS  GRAMS
     CO   MASS  GRAMS
     CO?  MASS  GRAMS
     NOX  MASS  GRAMS
     SCI?  MASS  GRAMS
     HC GRAMS/KM  (GRAMS/MILE)
     CO GRAMS/KM  (GRAMS/MILE)
     CO? GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
     NOX GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
     FUEL CONSUMPTION  BY CB  L/100KM  (MPG)
     CVS FLOW STO. CU. MEIRES  (SCF)
     CALCULATED DISTANCE KM(MILF.S)
WEIGHTED FUEL
WEIGHTED MASS
WEIGHTED MASS
WEIGHTED MASS
WEIGHTED MASS
    TOTAL CVS
             CONSUMPTION LITRES/1UOKM  (MPG)
             HC GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
             CO GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
             CO? GRAMS/KM  (GRAMS/MILE)
             NOX GRAMS/KM  (GRAMS/MILE)
             FLOW =   578.0 STO. CU. METRES
                             BLOWER INLET PRESS., Gl 73b.b MM. H20
                             BLOWER INLET TEMP.   H5 DEG. C
I
f 0 b h 3
33. t/ 3
33"»
1. 1/ 3
11
5t.H/ 3
13-»7
.!/ 3
2
17. I/ 3
1.63
3.S/ 3
.05
3b.5/ 3
3b.5
.i/ a
.9
-0.07-0
-0.0
-0.0/-0
-0.11
325
1282
1.78
35.7
0.0
1* .04
111.9H
24^.58
f ,t9
0.00
2.H7 ( 3.
IS. 71 ( 31.
H30.87 (b93.
.79 ( I.
20.05 C 11.
75.0 (2bH8
5. b8 ( 3.
18. bS
.59
b.bb
H21.S3
.85
2
bS520
11. 8/ 2
12
10. 0/ 2
10
29.0/13
27
3.0/13
3
b7.H/ 3
1.21
2.7/ 3
.0-»
23. 0/ 2
23.0
.9/ 2
.9
-0.0/-0
-0.0
-0.0/-0
-0.0
3
21*
1.17
22.2
0.0
.20
3.5b
2755. fa?
Y.77
0.00
98) .03 ( .05)
72) .58 C .93)
28) HYS.Bb (71b.S9)
27) .77 ( 1.2f)
73) 19.05 ( 12.35)
.3) 128.2 (H527.1*)
53) b.19 ( 3.85)
( 12. b2)
( .95)
( 10.71)
(b83.07)
( 1.37)
3
f05f3
38. 7/ 2
39
9.9/ 2
10
25. O/ 3
579
.!/ 3
2
87. 2/ 3
l.b?
2. 1/ 3
.03
*8.t/ 2
«f8.H
.9/ 2
.9
-0.0/-0
-n.o
-0.0/-0
-0.0
30
552
1.59
t7.b
0.0
1.30
ta.io
2178. 9S
5.97
0.00
.53 (
8.39 ( 13.
380.25 (bll.
l.OH ( 1.
lb.82 ( 13.
7t.B (2faHO
5.73 ( 3.





































3b)
50)
82)
bB)
98)
• •»)
5b)






-------
                               TABLE
                                            HXHAUST EMISSIONS FROM SINGLE BAG SAMPLE
                                                  VEHICLE NUMBER EMR
                        DATE   »  c
                        SPFC.  MUM.    b.l  GRAM/KG
                        DISTANCE   21.b3l)  KM
                         TIME    -o HRS.
                         SET 7
                         TEST WT.  2ntl KG.
                         DRY BULB TEMP  25 C
                         BARO.   733.0 MM  HG.
                           FUEL  738.2 G/LITRE
                                                TEST  NO.   2
                                                ENGINE  5.9 LITREV  8
                                                GVW     0  KG
                                                REL.  HUM.  30.1  PCT
                                                MEASURED  FUEL   0.0(1  KG
                                                FUEL  HC   RATIO  l.bbO
                          RUN  DURATION
                          HLOwtR  INLET  PRESS.
                          BLOWER  DIF.   PRESS.
                          BLOWER  INLET  TEMP.
                          DYNO REVOLUTIONS
                          BLOWER  REVOLUTIONS
                          BLOWER  CU.  CM /REV.
                     23.30 MINUTES
                      7H9.3  MM. H20
                      7H9.3  MM  H20
                       "»3  DEG. C
                     112292
                     2228
W
I
00
                                       MF.TER  READING/SCALE
                                       PPM
                               BACKI;RO  METER  READING/SCALE
                               BACKGRD  PPM
                               SAMPLE   METER  READING/SCALE
                               SAMPLE   PPM
                               BACKGRD  MFTER  READING/SCALE
BAG RESULTS
 HC  SAKPLE
 HC  SAMPLE
 HC
 HC
 CO
 CO
 CO
 CO  BACKGRD PPM
 C02 SAMPLE  METER READING/SCALE
 C02 SAMPLE  PERCENT
 CU? RACKGRO METER READING/SCALE
 cu2 BACKGRD PERCENT
             METER READING/SCALE
             PPM
 NOX BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
 NOX BACKGRO PPM
 HC  CONCENTRAlION PPM
 CO  CONCENTRATION PPM
 C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
 NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
 S02 COCENTRATION PPM
     MASS (GRAMS)
     MASS (GRAMS)
NOX SAMPLE
NOX SAMPLE
                          HC
                          CO
                          C02 MASS  (GRAMS)
                          NOX MASS  (GRAMS)
                          302 MASS  (GRAMS)

                       HC  GRAMS/KM  (GRAMS/MILE)         .02  (
                       CO  GRAMS/KM  (GRAMS/MILE)         .bS  (
                       C02 GRAMS/KM  (GRAMS/MILE)         317  (
                       NOX GRAMS/KM  (GRAMS/MILE)        1.01  (
                       SO? GRAMS/KM  (GRAMS/MILE)        0.00  (
15. O/ 2
  15
12. 7/ 2
  19
b7.0/13
  bS
 H.5/13
   H
"»2.b/ 2
1.88
 1.9/ 2
 .07
bS.2/ 2
bs.a
 i.7/ a
 1.7
   H
  58
1.82
b3.7
0.0
 .ts
                                        b8bb.ll
                                          21.85
                                           0.00
                                       .Of)
                                      l.Of )
                                       511)
                                      I.b3)
                                      n.no)
                       HC  GRAMS/KG OF FUEL     .2?
                       CO  GRAMS/KG OF FUEL     b.5
                       CO? GRAMS/KG OF FUEL    3159
                       MIX GRAMS/KG OF FUEL   10.05
                       SO? GRAMS/KG UF FUEL    0.00
                              HC  GRAMS/MIN     .02
                              CO  GRAMS/MIN      .b
                              C02 GRAMS/MIN     295
                              NOX GRAMS/MIN     .94
                              S02 GRAMS/MIN   O.ni)
                       CARBON BALANCE FUEL ECONOMY  L/100KM  (MILES/GALLON)
                                                                                13.bO ( 17.3U)
                       TOTAL CVS FLOH=   PMb.SSTD.  CU.  METRES

-------
       TABLE
                    EXHAUST EMISSIONS FROM SINGLE BAG SAMPLE
                          VEHICLE NUMBER EM8
DATE  5/ 2/78              TIME    -0 HRS.        TEST NO.  2
MODEL  1177 PLY FURY       SET-7                  ENGINE 5.1 LITREO
RUN DURATION   23.30 MIN.  DISTANCE DRIVEN  21.74 KILOMETRES
cvs BLOWER TEST VOL.  2su.iB ACT. cu. METRES
                           SAMPLE
SULFATE DATA               	

 FILTER NO.              f7FH-2929
 SAMPLE VOL. CU. FT.        17.f8
 SAMPLE TEMP. DEC. F           78
 SAKPLE AREA SO. IN.     ff8b9.00
 DILUTION FACTOR                1
 STAND. DEN. MlCROG/ML       5.00
 STAND. AREA SO. IN.    151*93.00
 SOf,MICROG/FILTER         If.809

SULFUR DIOXIDE DATA

 SAMPLE VOL. CU. FT.         1.00
 SAMPLE TEMP. DEC. F           70
 AREA,BUBBLER 1              0.00
 OIL. FACT.,BUBBLER 1           1
 AREA,BUBBLER 2              0.00
 OIL. FACT.,BUBBLER 2           1
 STAND. DEN. MICROG/ML       1.00
 STAND. AREA,SO. IN.         1.00
 so2, MILLIG/BUBBLER i      o.ooo
 so2, MILLIG/BUBBLER 2      o.ooo
 S02, PPM                     0.0

SULFATE AND 302 EMISSIONS

 NET SULFATE,MILLIGRAM/TEST
 NET H2SOf,MILLIGRAM/TEST
 NET 302,GRAM/TEST
 NET SULFATE,MILLIGRAM/KILOMETRE
 NET H2SOf,MILLIGRAM/KILOMETRE
 NET 302,GRAM/KILOMETRE
SULFUR BALANCE
 FUEL WT., 2183 GRAMS
           SULFUR,GRAMS
           PCT. RECOVERY
                                       8.590
                                       8.770
                                       0.000
                                        .395
                                        ,-»03
                                       0.000
                                                  BACKGROUND
                                                      1.00
                                                        70
                                                      0.00
                            ,b8
0.000
 0.00
                                                         1
                                                       .00
                                                        00
                                                     0.000
                                                      1.00
                                                        70
                                                      0.00
                                                         1
                                                      0.00
                                                         1
                                                      1.00
                                                      1.00
                                                     0.000
                                                     0.000
                                                       0.0
                          SULFUR IN FUEL, .0310 PCT.
                           FUEL      S02       H2SOH
           .0029
302 + H2SOf

    .0029

-------
                             1 ABLE
                                          f.XHAUST  EMISSIONS  FROM  SINGLE PAG SAMPLE
                                                VEHICLE  NUMBER  EMR
W
 I
                      DA 1 F   S/  3/7H
                      MOtitL   11'77  PLY  FUHY
                      ORIVtR    JC
                      WET  BIILH  TEMP   1H  C
                      SPEC.  HUM.   5.9  GRAM/KG
                      DISTANCE   lb.3S4  KM
                            TIME    -U  MRS.
                            HFE1
                            TEST WT.  2Dfl KG.
                            DRY BULB  TEMP  2b  C
                            HARD.   732.8 MM  HG.
                             FUEL  738.? 6/LITRE
          TEST NO.  3
          ENGINE s.i LITREV e
          GVW    o KG
          REL. HUM.  28.0 PCT
          MEASURED FUEL  0.00 KG
          FUEL HC  RATIO l.BbU
                        RUN  OIJI'ATlUN
                        BLOwfcR  INLET  PRESS.
                        rtLOrfER  DIF.   PRESS.
                        BLOWER  INLET  Tfc'MP.
                        OYNO  REVOLUTIONS
                        BLOWER  REVOLUTIONS
                        BLOWER  CU.  CM /REV.
                       12.7b MINUTES
                         7f9.3  MM. H20
                         7fq.3  MM  H20
                         H3  DEG. C
                      237b7
                         bine?
                       222b
  BAG RESULTS
   HC  SAMPLE  METER READING/SCALE
   HC  SAMPLE  PPM
   HC  BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
   HC  BACKGRD PPM
   CO  SAMPLE  METER READING/SCALE
   CO  SAMPLE  PPM
   CO  BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
   CO  BACKGRD PPM
   C02 SAMPLE  METER READING/SCALE
   C02 SAMPLE  PERCENT
   C02 BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
   C02 BACKGRD PERCENT
   NOX SAMPLE  METER READING/SCALE
   NOX SAMPLE  PPM
   NOX BACKGKU METER READING/SCALE
   NOX BACKGRD PPM
   hC  CONCENTRATION PPM
   CO  CONCENTRATION PPM
   C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
   NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
   S02 COCENTRATION PPM
   HC  MA3S (GRAMS)
   CO  MASS (GRAMS)
   C02 MASS (GRAMS)
   NOX MASS (GRAMS)
   302 MASS (GRAMS)
HC  GKAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
CO  GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
C0,> GHAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
NOX GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
SO? GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
     18. O/ 2
       18
     12. S/ 2
       13
     50.1/12
      110
      3.H/12
        >»
     H8.1/ 2
     2.22
      l.S/ 2
      .OS
     85. b/ S
     85. b
      1.3/ 2
      1.3
        R
      101
     2.18
     BH.5
     0.0
      .HI
    13.32
                                                                  15.75
                                                                   0.00
                                                       .03  (
                                                       .81  (
                                                       275  (
                                                       .Sb  (
                                                      0.00  (
 .05)
1.31)
 HH3)
1.55)
0.00)
                     HC  GRAMS/KG OF FUEL     .35
                     CO  GRAMS/KG OF FUEL     S.3
                     C02 GRAHS/KG OF FUEL    315f
                     NOX &HAMS/KG OF FUEL   11.Of
                     SO.' GRAMS/KG OF FUtL    U.OO
                                HC  GRAMS/MIN
                                CO  GRAMS/MIN
                                C02 GRAMS/MIN
                                NOX GRAMS/MIN
                                302 GRAMS/MIN
         ..OH
         1.0
         353
        1.23
        0.00
                     CARBON BALANCE FUEL  ECONOMY  L/100KM  (MILES/GALLON)

                     TOTAL CVS FLOH=    113.DSTD.  CU.  METRES
                                                         11.80  (

-------
                                   TABLE
   UNIT NO.  FM8
   VEHICLE MODEL
              1ES1 NU.
          PLYMOUTH FURY
                                             VEHICLE EMISSION  RESULTS
                                          jq?8  LIGHT DUTY EMISSIONS TEST
                                   ACTUAL DISTANCES USED IN CALCULATIONS
                               DATE  5/  B/7B                     MFGR.  CODE
                               ENGINE    5.90 LITRE S             CURB WT.
-0
0 KG
YR.  1977
GVM     U KG
   BAROMETER 71H.1? MM UF  H6.
   DRY BULB TEMP.   ?3.9 OF6.  C
   REL. HUMIDITY     31 PCT.

   EXHAUST EMISSIONS

        BLOWER OIF. PRESS.*  G?,  73b.b  MM.
        RAG RESULTS
        RAG NO.
        HLUWER REVOLUTIONS
        HC
        HC
        HC
        HC
        CO
        CO
        CO
        CO
        CO?  SAMPLE  METER  READING/SCALE
                     PERCENT
I
Ui
                                  H?0
             METFR READING/SCALE
             PPM
CO?
CO?
CO?
NOX
NOX
NOX
NOX
SO?
SO?
SO?
SO?
SAKPLE
SAMPLE
1>ACKGRI1 MEIER READING/SCALE
BACKGPD PPM
SAKPLE  MFTER HEADING/SCALE
SAKPLE  PPM
BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
BACKGRD PPM
SAMPLE
SAKPLE
OACKGHD METER READING/SCALE
BACKGRD PERCENT
SAMPLE  METER READING/SCALE
SAMPLE  PPM
BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
BACKGHD PPM
             SAMPLE
             SAKPLF
        METFR READING/SCALE
        PPM
             BACKGRD  METER  READING/SCALE
             BACKGKD  PPM
        HC   CONCENTRATION  PPM
        CO   CONCENTRATION  PPM
        CO?  CONCENTRATION  PCT
        NOX  CONCENTRATION  PPM
        SO?  CONCENTRATION  PPM
        HC   MASS  GRAMS
        CO   MASS  GRAMS
        CO?  MASS  GRAMS
        NOX  MASS  GRAMS
        SO?  MASS  GRAMS
        HC GRAMS/KM  (GRAMS/MILE)
        CO GRAMS/KM  (GRAMS/MILE)
        CO? GRAMS/KM  (GRAMS/MILE)
        NOX GRAMS/KM  (GRAMS/MILE)
        FUEL CONSUMPTION  BY  CB   L/10UKM  (MPG)
        CVS FLOW STD.  CU. METRES  ISCF)
        CALCULATED DISTANCE  KM(MILES)
  WEIGHTED FUEL
  WEIGHTED MASS
  WEIGHTED MASS
  WEIGHTED MASS
  WEIGHTED MASS
      TOTAL CVS
        CONSUMPTION LITRFS/1UOKM  (MPG)
        HC GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MlLE)
        CO GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
        COS GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
        NOX GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
        FLOW =   ?79.9 SID. CU. METRES
                                                                  WET  BULB  TEMP   13.1  DEC.  C
                                                                   ABS.  HUMIDITY    5.9 GRAMS/KG
                                                                   COMMENTS   1178   FTPC
                                                            BLOWER  INLET  PRESS.,  GI  ?3b.b  MM.  HBO
                                                            BLOWER  INLET  TEMP.    43  OEG. c
1
40b89
95. ?/ 2
95
10. 9/ 2
11
?b.7/ 3
b?0
.!/ 3
2
42. S/ ?
1.87
l.b/ 2
.Ob
54. 9/ 2
54.9
.?/ 2
- .7
-D.O/-0
-0.0
-0.0/-0
-0.0
8b
590
l.S?
54.3
o.n
3.7*
51. 8b
2518.11
b.77
O.OU
.b5 ( 1.
9.01 ( 14.
H37.b9 (70t.
1.18 ( 1 .
19.37 ( 1?.
75.5 (?bbb
5.75 ( 3.
IB. 39
.18
?.B7
•»?b.73
1.118
?
b9blt
13. IX 2
13
10. 3/ 8
10
ta.?/13
10
.5/13
0
bb.9/ 3
1.20
3.0/ 3
.05
31. 0/ 2
31.0
.?/ 2
.7
-0.0/-0
-0.0
-0.0/-0
-0.0
H
38
l.lb
30. H
Ot 0
.28
5.75
2742. Ob
b.48
o.nu
05) .04 ( .07)
SO) .92 ( 1.49)
24) 44U.7? (709.12)
89) 1.04 ( l.b?)
14) 18.88 ( 12. 4b)
.3) 1?9.1 (45b0.9)
58) b.22 ( 3.87)
( 1?.79)
( .28)
( 4.b2)
(hHS.Otl)
( 1.74)
3
40539
18. ?/ 2
18
9.9/ 2
10
bn.0/12
134
.4/1?
1
89. fa/ 3
l.b?
2.4/ 3
.04
51. S/ 2
51.9
.9/ 2
.9
-0.0/-0
-0.0
-0.0/-0
-0.0
10
128
I.b4
51.1
0.0
.41
11.18
22SS.50
b.35
0.00
.07 (
1.93 ( 3.
388.51 (b25.
1.H9 ( 1.
lb.72 ( 14.
75.2 (2b5b
5.81 ( 3.





































11)
10)
12)
7b)
07)
.0)
bl)






-------
                                TABLE
                  EXHAUST EMISSIONS FROM SINGLE BAG SAMPLE
                        VEHICLE NUMBER EMfl
I
ui
N)
                         DATE.  S/ 8/7H
                         MfinfL  1977 PLY FURY
                         DRIVER   TJ
                         WEf HULR TEMP  ih C
                         SPEC. HUM.    b.R GRAM/KG
                         DISTANCE  21.74J KM
                         TIME    -n MRS.
                         SET-?
                         TEST WT.  20*1 KG.
                         DRV BULB TEMP  28 C
                         HARU.  737.h MM  HG.
                           FUEL 738.2 G/LITRE
          TEST NO.  1
          ENGINE 5.9 LITRE  8
          GVN    n KG
          REL. HUM.  28.H PCT
          MEASURED FUEL  0.00 KG
          FUEL HC  RATIO 1.8bO
                           RUN DURA I ION
                           RLOWER INLET PRESS.
                           BLUWER DIP.  PRESS.
                           BLOWER INLFT TEMP.
                           DYNO REVOLUTIONS
                           SLOWER REVOLUTIONS
                           BLOWER CU.  CM /REV.
                     23.28 MINUTES
                      7K2.D  MM. H20
                      7H2.0  MM  H20
                       f3  DEG. C
                    31bb8
                     112172
                     2227
                                        METER READING/SCALE
                                        PPM
                                BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
                                BACKGRD PPM
                                SAMPLE  METER READING/SCALE
                                SAMPLE  PPM
                                BACKGRD MFTER READING/SCALE
BAG RESULTS
 HC  SAMPLE
 HC  SAMPLE
 HC
 HC
 co
 CO
 CO
 CO  BACHGWD PPM
 C02 SAMPLE  METER READING/SCALE
 C02 SAMPLE  PERCENT
 C02 BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
 C02 BACKGRD PERCENT
             METER READING/SCALE
             PPM
 NOX BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
 NOX BACKGRD PPK
 HC  CONCENTRATION PPM
 CO  CONCENTRATION PPM
 CO? CONCENTRATION PCT
 NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
 802 COCtNTRATION PPM
     MASS (GRAMS)
     MASS (GRAMS)
                            NOX SAMPLE
                            NOX SAMPLE
                            HC
                            CO
     ib.n/ 2
       Ib
     12. 3/ 2
       12
     S3.b/12
      119
      1 .t/12
        2
     •»3.0/ 2
     1.90
      l.b/ 2
      .Ob
     Sb.b/ 2
     Sb.b
      l.l/ 2
      1.1
        5
      111
     1.85
     55.7
     0.0
                            C02 MASS (GRAMS)
                            NOX MASS (GRAMS)
                            S02 MASS (GRAMS)

                         HC  GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
                         CO  GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
                         C02 GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
                         NOX GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
                         S02 GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)

                         HC  GRAMS/KG OF FUEL    .29
                         co  GRAMS/KG OF FUEL   12.1
                         C02 GRAMS/KG OF FUEL   31t9
                         NOX GRAMS/KG OF FUEL   8.77
                         S02 GRAMS/KG OF FUEL   O.PP
    2b.8H
  7010. ?»
    19.52
     n.oo
                               .03 (
                              1.23 (
                               .90 (
                              0.00 (
 .05)
1.98)
 518)
l.Ht)
n.nn)
                              HC  GRAMS/MIN
                              CO  GRAMS/MIN
                              C02 GRAMS/MIN
                              NOX GRAMS/MIN
                              S02 GRAMS/MIN
         .03
         301
                                                                         o.un
                         CARBON BALANCE FUEL ECONOMY L/ldnKM (MILES/GALLON)

                         TOTAL CVS FLUH=   2O7.3STD. CU. METRES
                                                      13.82 (  17.02)

-------
                               TABLE
                                            EXHAUST  EMISSIONS FROM  SINGLE BAG SAMPLE
                                                  VEHICLE  NUMBER  EMS
M

un
U)
                        DATE   S/  8/78               TIME     -0  HRS.         TEST NO.   1
                        MODEL   1177  PLY  FURY        SET-7                   ENGINE 5.1 LlTREO
                        RUN DURATION  23.28  MIN.   DISTANCE DRIVEN   21.7t  KILOMETRES
                        cvs BLOWER  TEST  VOL.   2*s.83  ACT.  cu.  METRES
                           SAMPLE
SULFATE DATA

 FILTER HO.              17FH-2132
 SAMPLE VOL. CU. FT.        17.11
 SAMPLE TEMP. DEG. F           88
 SAMPLE AREA so. IN.     sotob.oo
 DILUTION FACTOR                i
 STAND. DEN. MICROG/ML       5.00
 STAND. AREA SO. IN.    lb*372.00
 SOH,MICROG/FILTER         15.333

SULFUR DIOXIDE DATA

 SAMPLE VOL. CU. FT.         1.00
 SAMPLE TEMP. DEG. F           70
 AREA,BUBBLER i              o.oo
 OIL. FACT..BUBBLER 1           1
 AREA,BUBBLER 2              0.00
 DIL. FACT.,BUBBLER 2           1
 STAND. DEN. MICROG/ML       1.00
 STAND. AREA,SQ. IN.         1.00
 S02, MILLIG/BUBBLER 1      0.000
 SOS, MILLIG/BUBBLER 2      0.000
 S02, PPM                     0.0

SULFATE AND S02 EMISSIONS

 NET SULFATE,MILLIGRAM/TEST
 NET H2SOf,MILLIGRAM/TEST
 NET 302,GRAM/TEST
 NET SULFATE,MILLIGRAM/KILOMETRE
 NET H2SOH,MILLIGRAM/KILOMETRE
 NET 302,GRAM/KILOMETRE
                        SULFUR BALANCE
                         FUEL WT.,  2235 GRAMS
                                   SULFUR,GRAMS
                                   PCT. RECOVERY
                                                               8.118
                                                               S.lOb
                                                               0.000
                                                                .110
                                                                .HIS
                                                               0.000
                                                                          BACKGROUND
                                                                              1.00
                                                                                70
                                                                              0.00
                                                                                 1
                                                                              1.00
                                                                              1.00
                                                                             0.000
       1.00
         70
       0.00
          1
       0.00
          1
       1.00
       1.00
      0.000
      0.000
        0.0
                          SULFUR IN FUEL, .0310 PCT.
                           FUEL      302       H2SOf
                                                    .bl
                                    0.000
                                     0.00
.0030
  .t3
302 i H2SO*

    .0030

-------
                              T AHLF
I
cn
                                           EXHAUST EMISSIONS FROM SINGLE BAG SAMPLE
                                                 VEHICLE NUMBER EMB
                       DATE   S/  R/7H

                       MODEL   1177 PLY FURY
                       DRIVER   TJ
                       WET  BULB  TFMP  lb C

                       SPFC.  HUM.    b.3 GRAM/KG
    TIME    -U HRS.
    FET
    TF.ST WT.  SITU KG.
    DRY BULB TEMP  29 C
    BAUD.   737.b MM  HG.
                                                   TEST  NO.   1
                                                   ENGINE  5.S LITRE   R
                                                   G V W     0  K G
                                                   REL.  HUM.   ?t.B  PCT
                                                   MEASURED  FUEL   O.Of)  KG
                       DISTANCE
                                        KM
      FUEL 73B.2 G/LITRE   FUEL HC  RATIO 1.8bO
                         RUN  DURATION
                         PLOWEW INLET PRESS.
                         BLOWER DIF.   PRESS.
                         BLOWER IULET TEMP.
                         DYNO REVOLUTIONS
                         BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
12. 7b MINUTES
 7b2.0  MM. H20

 7b2.0  MM  H20
  43  UEG. C
                                               b!571
  BLOWER CU. CM /REV.  222b

  BAG RESULTS
   HC  SAMPLE  METER READING/SCALE
   HC  SAMPLE  PPM
   HC  BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
   HC  BACKGRO PPM
   CO  SAMPLE  MFTER READING/SCALE
   CO  SAKPLE  PPM
   CO  BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
   CO  BACKGRD PPM
   COS SAMPLE  METER READING/SCALE
   COS SAMPLE  PERCENT
   COS BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
   COS BACKGRD PERCENT
   NOX SAMPLE  METER READING/SCALE
   NOX SAMPLE  PPM
   NOX BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
   NOX BACKGRD PPM
   HC  CONCENTRATION PPM
   CO  CONCENTRATION PPM
   COS CONCENTRATION PCT
   NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
   302 COCENTRATION PPM
   HC  MASS (GRAMS)
   CO  MASS (GRAMS)
   COS MASS (GRAMS)
   NOX MASS (GRAMS)
   302 MASS (GRAMS)

HC  GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
CO  GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
COS GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
NOX GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
SO? GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
                      Ih.l/ 2

                        ib
                      11. a/ a
                        12
                      52.0/12
                       115
                        .8/12
                         1
                      H8.2/ i
                      2. IB
                       1.3X 2
                       .05
                      b8.1/ 2

                      bB.l
                       l.O/ Z
                       1.0
                         b
                       1U8
                      2.1H
                      b?.3
                      0.0
                       .HI

                     It. 38
                                                                   12. 7B

                                                                    O.Ofl
                                                        .02 (
                                                        .87 (
                                                        271 (
                                                        .78 (
                                                       o.on (
                  .ni)
                 l.HCI)
                 J.25)
                 0.00)
                      HC  GRAMS/KG  OF  FUEL     .SH
                      CO  GRAMS/KG  OF  FURL    10.1
                      CO? GRAMS/KG  OF  FUF.L    3153
                      NOX GRAMS/KG  OF  FUEL    i.ns
                      502 GRAMS/KG  OF  FUFL    n.on
         HC  GRAMS/MIN
         co  GRAMS/MIN
         COS GRAMS/MIN
         NOX GRAMS/MIN
         S02 GRAMS/MIN
                                                  .03

                                                  1.1
                                                  350
                                                 1.011
                                                 n.oo
                      CARHUN  BALANCE  FUEL  ECONOMY  L/lHilKM (MILES/GALLON)


                      TOTAL CVS  f:LOH=   113.9STP.  CU.  METRES
                                 11. b3
                                         2n.22)

-------
                                 TABLE
 UNIT NO.  EM8
 VEHICLE MODEL
      TEST NO.
  PLYMOUTH FURY
                                        H20
 BAROMETER  7H0.1b MM OF HG.
 DRY  BULB TEMP.    25.b OEG.  C
 REL.  HUMIDITY      S3  PCT.

 EXHAUST  EMISSIONS

     •BLOWER DIF. PRESS.,  G2, 73b.b MM.
      BAG RESULTS
      BAG NO.
      BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
      HC    SAMPLE  METER READING/SCALE
      HC    SAMPLE  PPM
      HC    BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
      HC    BACKGRD PPM
      CO    SAMPLE  METER READING/SCALE
      CO    SAMPLE  PPM
      CO    BACKGRD MtTER READING/SCALE
      CO    BACKGRD PPM
      COa  SAMPLE  METER READING/SCALE
      COa  SAMPLE  PERCENT
      COa  BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
      COa  BACKGRD PERCENT
      NOX  SAMPLE  METER READING/SCALE
      NOX  SAMPLE  PPM
i      NOX  BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
1      NOX  BACKGRD PPM
i      303  SAMPLE  METER READING/SCALE
      SOa  SAMPLE  PPM
      SOa  BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
      SOa  BACKGRD PPM
      HC   CONCENTRATION PPM
      CO   CONCENTRATION PPM
      COe  CONCENTRATION PCT
      NOX  CONCENTRATION PPM
      SOB  CONCENTRATION PPM
      HC   MASS GRAMS
      CO   MASS GRAMS
      COa  MASS GRAMS
      NOX  MASS GRAMS
      SOa  MASS GRAMS
      HC GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
      CO GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
      COa GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
      NOX GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
      FUEL CONSUMPTION BY CB  L/100KM (MPG)
      CVS FLOW STD. CU. METRES (SCF)
      CALCULATED DISTANCE KM(MILES)
             VEHICLE EMISSION RESULTS
          1978  LIGHT DUTY EMISSIONS TEST
    ACTUAL DISTANCES USED IN CALCULATIONS
DATE  S/ai/78                     MFGR.  CODE   -0
ENGINE   5.90 LITRE a             CURB WT.      o KG

                             WET BULB TEMP   18.9 DEC.  C
                              AbS.  HUMIDITY  11.1 GRAMS/KG
                              COMMENTS  1178 FTPC
                                                                                                            YR.
                                                                                                            GVM
1177
   U KG
WEIGHTED FUEL
WEIGHTED MASS
WEIGHTED MASS
WEIGHTED MASS
WEIGHTED MASS
    TOTAL CVS
CONSUMPTION LITRES/1UOKM (MPG)
HC GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
CO GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
COe GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
NOX GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
FLOW =   281.1 STD. CU. METRES
                                                         BLOWER INLET PRESS.,  Gl 73fa.b MM. H20
                                                         BLOWER INLET TEMP.   H3 DEC. C
1
HOS98
S.I/ 3
SS
1.5/ 3
15
H2.8/ 3
1028
.!/ 3
a
93. S/ 3
1.75
3.9/ 3
.Ob
31. 8/ a
31.8
i.o/ a
1.0
-0.0/-0
-0.0
-0.0/-0
-0.0
8b
97H
1.70
30. q
0.0
3.75
85.75
235H .H9
H.5H
0.00
.bS ( 1.
1H.87 ( 33.
HOB. a? (bSb.
.79 ( 1.
iB.si ( ia.
75. b (2b70
5.77 ( 3.
18. HS
.aa
S.b?
naa.73
.aa
a
blbbl
17. ?/ a
18
13. o/ a
13
bO.0/12
13H
2.H/12
H
b8.1/ 3
1.23
H.3/ 3
.07
15. 7/ 2
15.7
.5/ 2
.5
-0.0/-0
-0.0
-0.0/-0
-0.0
b
125
1.17
15.2
0.0
.HH
18.85
27b9.59
3.8H
0.00
OS) .07 ( .IS)
S2) 3.08 ( H.1S)
11) 452.50 (788.07)
27) .b3 ( 1.01)
71) 19.53 ( la.OS)
.9) 139.8 (1S82.S)
58) b.12 ( 3.80)
( 12.75)
( .35)
( 9.12)
(bSO.17)
( 1.32)
3
«*0b09
33. b/ 2
3«f
14. b/ 2
15
97.7/12
a*s
1.9/12
3
Bb.a/ 3
l.bO
a.?/ 3
.OH
H8.2/ 2
H8.2
1.2/ 2
1.2
-0.0/-0
-0.0
-0.0/-0
-0.0
21
231
l.Sb
H7.1
0.0
.11
20.33
21bH.37
b.92
0.00
,lb (
3. 55 ( 5.
377.92 (b08.
1.21 ( 1.
lb.39 ( 1H.
75.7 (2b71
5.73 ( 3.





































25)
71)
08)
9H)
35)
.b)
5b)






-------
                             TABLE
                    EXHAUST  EMISSIONS  FROM  SINGLE  BAG  SAMPLE
                           VEHICLE  NUMBER  EMS
M
I
ui
                      DATE   5/21/78
                      MODEL   1177  PLYMOUTH FURY
                      ORIVtH   TJ
                      WET  8ULH TEMP  J7  C
                      SPFC.  HUM.    8.8  OKAM/KG
                      DISTANCE  21.b5e  KM
                            TIME     -M  MRS.
                            SET-7
                            TEST NT.  20tl KG.
                            DRY BULB  TEMP  2H  C
                            BARO.   7t0.2 MM  HG.
          TEST NO.  2
          ENGINE 5.1 LITREV 8
          GVW    o KG
          REL. HUM.  HS.O PCT
          MEASURED FUEL  0.00 KG
                              FUEL  738.2  G/LlTRE    FUEL  HC   RATIO  1.8bO
                        PUN  DURATION
                        BLOWER INLET PRESS.
                        BLOWER DIF.   PRESS.
                        RLOWER INLET TEMP.
                        DYNO REVOLUTIONS
                        BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
                        BLOWER CU.  CM /REV.
                       23.21  MINUTES
                         7b2.0   MM. H20
                         7b2.D   MM  H20
                          H3   DEG. C
                       31Hbb
                       1122Sb
                       222b
  PAG RESULTS
   HC  SAMPLE  METER READING/SCALE
   HC  SAMPLE  PPM
   HC  BACKGKO METER READING/SCALE
   HC  BACKGRD PPM
   CO  SAMPLE  METER READING/SCALE
   CO  SAMPLE  PPM
   CO  BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
   CO  BACKGRD PPM
   C02 SAMPLE  METER READING/SCALE
   C02 SAMPLE  PERCENT
   C02 BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
   C02 BACKGRD PERCENT
   NOX SAMPLE  METER READING/SCALE
   NOX SAMPLE  PPM
   NOX BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
   NOX BACKGRD PPM
   HC  CONCENTRATION PPM
   CO  CONCENTRATION PPM
   C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
   NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
   802 COCENTRATION PPM
   HC  MASS (GRAMS)
   CO  MASS (GRAMS)
   C02 MASS (GRAMS)
   NOX MASS (GRAMS)
   S02 MASS (GRAMS)

HC  GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
CO  GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
C02 GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
NOX GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
S02 GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)

HC  GRAMS/KG OF FUEL    .31
CO  GRAMS/KG OF FUF.L   20.0
C02 GRAMS/KG OF FUEL   3137
NOX GRAMS/KG OF FUEL   1.77
S02 GRAMS/KG OF FUEL   0.00
     11. 2/ 2
       11
     It.HX 2
       1»
     78.»/12
      180
      2.S/12
        H
     12. 3/ 3
     1.73
      3.bX 3
      .Ob
     SH.b/ 2
     St.b
      l.b/ 2
      l.b
        7
      Ib8
     l.bB
     S3. 2
     0.0
      .80
    »0.7S
                                                                  11.15
                                                                   n.oo
                                                       .Ot  (
                                                      1.88  (
                                                       21b  (
                                                       .12  (
                                                      0.00  (
 .Ob)
3.03)
 H7b)
o.no)
                                                      MC   GRAMS/MIN
                                                      CO   GRAMS/MIN
                                                      C02  GRAMS/MIN
                                                      NOX  GRAMS/MIN
                                                      302  GRAMS/MIN
         .03
         1.7
         275
         .8b
        0.00
                     CARBON BALANCE  FUEL  ECONOMY  L/100KM  (MILES/GALLON)

                     TOTAL CVS  FLOH=    ?08.5STD.  CU.  METRES
                                                         12.75  (  18.»S)

-------
                               TABLE
                                            EXHAUST EMISSIONS FROM SINGLE BAG SAMPLE
                                                  VEHICLE NUMBER EMH
I
Ul
-J
                        DATE   5/2S/78
                        MODEL   1177  PLYMOUTH  FURY
                        DRIVER    TJ
                        WET BULB  TEMP   lb  C
                        SPEC.  HUM.    8.1  GRAM/KG
                       DISTANCE
                         TIME    -0 HRS.
                         H-FET
                         TEST WT.  ?0tl KG.
                         DRY BULB TEMP  2H C
                         BARO.  7411.4 MM  HG.
                  TE3T NO.  3
                  ENGINE 5.9 LITREV B
                  GVW    0 KG
                  REL. HUM.  41.7 PCT
                  MEASURED FUEL  0.00 KG
                                         KM
                                                     FUEL 738.2 G/LITRE   FUEL HC  RATIO l.BfaU
                          RUN  DURATION
                          BLOWER  INLET  PRESS.
                          BLOWER  DIF.   PRF.SS.
                          RLOWER  INLET  TEMP.
                          DYNO REVOLUTIONS
                          BLOWER  REVOLUTIONS
                          BLOWER  CU.  CM /REV.
                     15.7b MINUTES
                      7b2.0  MM. H20
                      7b2.0  MM  H20
                       43  DEG. C
                    537*7
                      blSOl
                     222b
                                       METER READING/SCALE
                                       PPM
                               BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
                               BACKGRD PPM
                               SAMPLE  METFR READING/SCALE
                               SAMPLE  PPM
                               BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
BAG RESULTS
 HC  SAMPLE
 HC  SAMPLE
 HC
 HC
 CO
 CO
 CO
 CO  BACKGRD PPM
 COS SAMPLE  METER READING/SCALE
 C02 SAMPLE  PERCENT
 CO? BACKGRD METER READING/SCALE
 C02 BACKGRD PERCENT
 NOX SAMPLE  METER READING/SCALE
 NOX SAMPLE  PPM
 NOX BACKGRD MtTER READING/SCALE
 NOX BACKGKO PPM
     CONCENTRATION PPM
     CONCENTRATION PPM
 C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
 NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
 802 COCENTRAT10N PPM
     MASS (GRAMS)
     MASS (GHAMS)
 COS MASS (GRAMS)
 NOX MASS (GRAMS)
 S02 MASS (GRAMS)
                           HC
                           CO
                           HC
                           CO
                        HC   GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
                        CO   GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
                        COS  GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
                        NOX  GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
                        S02  GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)

                        HC   GRAMS/KG OF FUEL    .37
                        CO   GRAMS/KG OF FUEL   17.5
                        C05  GRAMS/KG OF FUEL   3JH1
                        NOX  GRAMS/KG OF FUEL  11.51
                        S05  GRAMS/KG OF FUEL   0.00
             1B.5/ 2
               18
             12. b/ 2
               13
             81.5/12
              189
              1.4/12
                2
             4b.8/ 2
             2.10
              l.b/ 2
              .Ob
             79. I/ 2
             79.1
              l.l/ 2
              1.1
                e
              177
             2.05
             78.2
             0.0
              .50
            23.52
          >>29b.21
                                                                     0.00
                                .03  (
                              l.tf  (
                                2b3  (
                                .9b  (
                              0.00  (
         .05)
        2.32)
         H23)
        1.55)
        0.00)
HC  GRAMS/MIN
CO  GRAMS/MIN
COc GRAMS/MIN
NOX GRAMS/MIN
S02 GRAMS/MIN
                                                .OH
                                                1.8
                                                337
                                              1.23
                                              0.00
                        CARBON BALANCE FUEL ECONOMY L/100KM (MILES/GALLON)
                                                      11.32  ( 20.78)
                        TOTAL  CVS FLOWr   11H.3STD.  CU. METRES

-------
                                            TABLE
 VEHICLE NO.  EM8
 VEHICLE MODEL   77 FURY
 ENGINE 5.9 LObO CIO) V-B
 TRANSMISSION A3
 GVW     II KG(    -U LB3)

 BAROMETER 739.If MM HG(29.10 IN H6)
 DRY BULB TEMP. 25.0 OEG C(77.0 DEG F)
 BAG RESULTS
    BAG NUMBER
    DESCRIPTION
    BLOWER DIF P MM. H20(IN. H20)
    BLOWER INLET P MM. H20(IN. H20)
    BLOWER INLET TEMP. DEC. CCDEG. F)
    BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
    CVS FLOW STD. CU. METRES(SCF)
n
 i
Ul
oo
    SAMPLE
    BCKGRD
    SAMPLE
    BCKGRD
COS SAMPLE
CO? BCKGRD
NOX SAMPLE
NOX BCKGRO
    HC
    HC
    CO
    CO
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PCT
METER/RANGE/PCT
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
    DILUTION FACTOR
    HC  CONCENTRATION PPM
    CO  CONCENTRATION PPM
    CO? CONCENTRATION PCT
    NOX CONCENTRATION PPM

    HC  MASS GRAMS
    CO  MASS GRAMS
    CO? MASS GRAMS
    NOX MASS GRAMS

    HC  GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
    CO  GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
    CO? GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
    NOX GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
    FUEL  CONSUMPTION BY CB L/100KM(MPG)
    CALCULATED  DISTANCE KM (MILES)

 COMPOSITE  FTP  RESULTS
    HC   GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
    CO   GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
    CO? GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
    NOX GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
    FUFL  CONSUMPTION BY CB L/100KM (MPG)
                                                   VEHICLE EMISSION RESULTS
                                                          FTP

                                                  TEST NO.5-?    RUN  1
                                                  DATE  b/ 1/78
                                                  TIME 09!32
                                                  DYNO NO.  3
                                                  CVS NO.   2
                                                  BAG CART NO.  1
                                         TEST WEIC.HT
                                         ACTUAL ROAD LOAD
                                         GASOLINE
                                         ODOMtTtR   2S5H9
                                                                                                            PKOJECT  NO.  11-t 74H-IMI1
                                                                                                   KG(   450U  LHS)
                                                                                                  10.4  KW(  1H.U  HP)
                                                  RELATIVE HUMIDITY Sb PCT
                                                  ABSOLUTE HUMIDITY 11.4 GM/KGC  79.1  GRAINS/LB)
                                                                                           NOX  HUMIDITY  C.F.  l.n?3H
                                                COLO TRANSIENT
                                                 7b?,0  C30.0)
                                                 7b?.0  (30.0)
                                                  43.9  (111.0)
                                                     4Ub21
                                                  75.?  (?b5b.O)
14.O/ 3/
 1.9/ 3/
2b.l/ 3/
  .3/ 3/
140
 IS
bOb
  7
48. b/ ?/ ?.?0
 l.S/ ?/  .07
S3.b/ ?/   5f
 l.S/ 2/    ?

     5.8S
     1?H
     5bH
    ?.1S
    52. H

     5.3S
    »S.3b
   esss.i
     7.71

  .It (  1.50)
 B.57 ( 13.78)
513.0 ( 825. •»)
 1.3* (  2.15)
22. bO ( 10.«»1)
 5.7b (  3.58)
                                          .24 (   .38)
                                         3.90 (  b.?7)
                                       524.08 (843.25)
                                         1. 4 11 (  2.25)
                                        22.bb ( 10.38)
  STABILIZED
7b2.0 (30.0)
7b2.0 (30.0)
 43. 3 (110.0)
    b9b53
129.1 (4558.1)

20. 3/ 2/   20
18. b/ 2/   19
59.1/12/  132
 4.9/12/    9
83. B/ 3/ 1.55
 3.9/ 3/  .Ob
37. ?/ 2/   37
  .b/ 2/    1

     B.57
       H
     118
    1.50
    3b.7
                                                                         17.72
                                                                        3535.1
                                                                          S.2b

                                                                        .05  (    .07)
                                                                      2. 82  (  H.Sf)
                                                                     5b2.5  ( 905.1)
                                                                      1.47  (  2.37)
                                                                     24.20  (  9.72)
                                                                      b.28  (  3.91)
HOT TRANSIENT
7b2.0 (30.0)
7b2.0 (30.0)
 43.3 (110.0)
    4Ub05
 75.2 (2b57.3)

24.B/ i/   25
lb.1/ 2/   lb
73.9/12/  Ib8
  .9/12/    2
43.b/ 2/ 1.93
 1.3/ 2/  .05
50.9/ 2/   51
  .b/ 2/    1

     b.88
      11
     158
    1.89
    5U.H

      .48
    13.82
   .2bU3.3
     7.42

  .08 (   .14)
 2.43 (  3.91)
H58.1 ( 737.2)
 1.31 (  2.10)
19.73 ( 11.92)
 5.b8 (  3.53)

-------
                                            TABLE
 VEHICLE NO.  EMB
 VEHICLE MODEL   77 FURY
 ENGINE 5.1 LUbO CIO) V-8
 TRANSMISSION A3
 GVW     0 KG(    -0 L6S)
 BAROMETER 731.90 MM HG(?q.l3 IN HG)
 DRY BULB TEMP. 83.q OEG CC7S.O DEC F)

 BAG RESULTS
    BAG NUMBER
    BLOWER DIF P MM. H20(IN. H20)
    BLOWER INLET P MM. H50CIN. H20)
    BLOWER INLET TEMP. DEG. CCDEG. F)
    BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
    CVS FLOW STO. CU. METRES(SCF)
H
I
HC
HC
CO
CO
    SAMPLE
    BCKGRO
    SAMPLE
    BCKGRD
CO? SAMPLE
C02 BCKGRD
NOX SAMPLE
NOX BCKGRD
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PCT
METER/RANGE/PCT
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
    DILUTION FACTOR
    HC  CONCENTRATION PPM
    CO  CONCENTRATION PPM
    COS CONCENTRATION PCT
    NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
                                                   VEHICLE EMISSION RESULTS
                                                          SET
                                                  TEST NO.5-2
                                                  DATE  b/ 1/78
                                                  TIME ll«3b
                                                  DYNO NO.  3
                                                  CVS NO.    Z
                                                  BAG CART NO.
                                                                 RUN 2
                                                                                                           PKOJECT NU.
                                                                               TEST  WEIGHT    1818  KG(   tOOO LBS)
                                                                               ACTUAL  ROAD  LOAD  10. t  Kw(  1H.O  HP)
                                                                               GASOLINE
                                                                               OOOMtTER
                                                  RELATIVE HUMIDITY *8 PCT
                                                  ABSOLUTE HUMIDITY  S.I GM/KGC b3.S  GRAINS/LB)
                                                 7b2.0 (30.0)
                                                 7*2.0 (30.0)
                                                  f3.3 (110.0)
                                                    112335
                                                 208.t (735S.7)
                                                                                                     NOX HUMIDITY  C.F.   .SH8S
11
lb
78

tt
1
bS
1




.8/ 2/
.3/ 2/
.8/12/
.8/12/
.8/ 2/ J
.b/ 2/
.7/ 2/
.t/ 2/
b.bb
b
171
1.15
20
lb
181
1
L .11
.Ob
bb
1




    HC  MASS GRAMS
    CO  MASS GRAMS
    CO? MASS GRAMS
    NOX MASS GRAMS

    HC  GRAMS/KM  (GRAMS/MILE)
    CO  GRAMS/KM  (GRAMS/MILE)
    CO? GRAMS/KM  (GRAMS/MILE)
    NOX GRAMS/KM  (GRAMS/MILE)
    FUEL CONSUMPTION  BY CB L/100KM(MPG)
    CALCULATED DISTANCE KM (MILES)
                                                       .71
                                                     11.38
                                                    7*22.5
                                                   .03 (   .05)
                                                  1.87 (  3.02)
                                                 33b.3 ( SH1.1)
                                                  1.11 (  1.78)
                                                 It.tS ( lb.2f)
                                                 22.07 ( 13.72)

-------
  VEHICLE  NO.   EM8
  VfHICLF  MODEL   77  FURY
  ENGINF  s.9  LOhn  CID)  V-B
  TRANSMISSION  A3
  GVH      n KG(    -0 LBS)


  BAROMETER 739.1H  MM HG(29.10  IN HG)
  DRY  BULB  TEMP. 2H.H DEC  C(7h.O  DEC f~)

  BAG  RESULTS
    BAG  NUMBER
    BLOWER DIF P  MM. H20(IN.  H20)
    BLOHER INLET  P MM.  H20CIN.  H20)
    BLOWER INLET  TEMP.  DEG.  C(DEG.  F)
    BLOHER REVOLUTIONS
    CVS  FLOW STD.  CU. METRES(SCF)
                                         TABLE       VEHICLE EMISSION RESULTS
                                                           HFET

                                                   TEST  NO.5-2     RUN 3
                                                   PATE   b/ 1/78
                                                   TIME  12:>»5
                                                   DYNO  NO.  3
                                                   CVS  NO.    2
                                                   HAG  CART NO.  1
w
HC
HC
CO
CO
    SAMPLE
    BCKGRD
    SAMPLE
    BCKGRD
CO? SAMPLE
CO? BCKGRD
NOX SAMPLE
NOX HCKGRD
                METER/RANGE/PPM
                METER/RANGE/PPM
                METER/RANGE/PPM
                METER/RANGE/PPM
                METER/RANGE/PCT
                METER/RANGE/PCT
                METER/RANGE/PPM
                METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
HC  CONCENTRATION PPM
CO  CONCENTRATION PPM
CO? CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM

HC  MASS GRAMS
CO  MASS GRAMS
CO? MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS

HC  GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
CO  GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
CO? GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
NOX GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
FUEL CONSUMPTION BY CB L/inOKM(MPG)
CALCULATED DISTANCE KM (MILES)
                                                      PHOJECT  NU.  ll-H7«b-0(Jl

                                         TES1 V.EIGHT    1R18  KG(   HUOO  LHS)
                                         ACTUAL ROAD LOAD   10.H  KW(  1 H . l>  HP)
                                         GASOLINE
                                         ODOMtTER
                                                   RELATIVE  HUMIDITY  <*5 PCT
                                                   ABSOLUTE  HUMIDITY   B.8  GM/KG(  bl.9 GRAINS/L8)
                                                  7b2.0  (30.0)
                                                  7b2.0  (30.0)
                                                   H3.3  (110.0)
                                                      b!399
                                                  113.8  (H017.9)
                                                    NOX HUMIDITY  C.F.   .9419
It. I/ e/
12. 5/ 2/
7U.8/12/
 2.2/ia/
H7.2/ a/
 l.S/ 2/
bH.H/ 2/
 l.B/ 5/

     b.2b
                                                             13
                                                            IfaO
                                                              »
                                                           2.13
                                                            .05
                                                             bt
                                                          2. OB
                                                          b2.9

                                                            .2*
                                                          19. bH
                                                         H333.H
                                                          12.89

                                                        .01 (    .02)
                                                       1.11 (   1.79)
                                                      2HS.b (  395.2)
                                                        .73 (   1.18)
                                                      10. Sb (  22.28)
                                                      17. bH (  10. 9b)

-------
              APPENDIX P

          COMPUTER PRINTOUTS
                  FOR
AIR MODULATION SYSTEM OPTIMIZATION AND
   DURABILITY TESTS ON A  1978 VOLVO
    (Tests in Chronological Order)

-------
                                                 TARLF  A-4.
   H ir.i fc  n-i. i f.-iu
  .HICLE  M')OF|.    ?H  VOLVH  HM-JI
   r, I nt-  c.i  I.(1 in  CILO L-M
   AIJlMl mi I'd
   *        KT,(     -ii  Lt!S)
HARII'KfFH 7IH.H9 MM  Hi:(29.09  IN  HU)
L)PY  H'lLM lenp.  e^.d  DIG T(7d.ll  OF.t, F)

HA i,  RF3IIL 1 S
    UtSCK|PT[UN
    HL''if.l-!i  OIF H MM.  H?0(IM.
    Hl.iiw(..<  ItJLET P  MM. Hen( IN. H?|)J
            I'iLFT TfcMH. OEG.  C(OhG.  F)
            ht Vdl.UT JONS
    CVS KuV,  STI).  CLI.  KE




M
1
ro
HC
HC
CO
( I)
COP
CO?
NOX
SAMPLE
HCKGHIJ
SA-IPLt
HC^GHO
SA IPLt
H c < r> tu)
SAiPLt
                Mh rF W/RANI,E/PPM
                M h FEK/WANUE/PPM
                MF TF
                ME ThH/WANUEXPCT
                Mfc ft RXRANGEXPPM
    NOX HCKGHD ME TF.HXRANGE/PPM
PC f
    DllUTIUN
    HC  CONCKKTRATION PPM
    CO  CONCENTRATION PPH
    LOP COHCl r.TRATIDN
    NOX CONCKNTRA TIllN PPM
    HC  MASS
    CO  MASS  C.WAMS
    CO? MASS  I.KAMS
    Nil* MASS
    HC   GRIMS/KM
    CO   GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
    COP  GRAMS/KM (UWAMS/NlLt)
    NO*  liKAMS/KM (U.9AMS/MILE)
    FUFL CONSUMPTION  4Y  CH L/I
          UKM(HPG)
   LALCULATLI)  OISIANCF  KM  CMILtS)

COMPOSITE FTP  RESULTS
   HC   GNAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
   CU   GRAMS/KM
   Co?  GRAMS/KM
   NOir  G.VAMS/KM (L.PAMS/MHE)
   FllfL  Cl'NSUMPTlMM  hY  Crt  L/lHHKM (MPu)
  3. If  (
3?3. 1 3  (
   .11?  (
                                     VEHICLE E'MSSION RESULTS
                                             f rp
                                                                                                                       PROJECT Nl.  ll-H7Hh-lHil
TEST  NO.  i      RUN i
OATf   7Xe!7X7B
I IME  It? :-*H
OYNO  NO.   3
CV3 NO.    2
HAi, CART  NO.   1
                                                                                 TEST HEIGHT    13bH
                                                                                 ACTUAL  ROAU LOAD
                                                                                 GAbOLINE  EN-27H-F
                                                                                 OflOMETEH        ?8
                                                                               H.H
                                                                                                                                   3iUiu
                                                                                                                                  KV.(  11.3
                                                                                             HP)
                                    RELATIVE HUMIDITY
                                    ABSOLUTE HUMIDITY
                                                                                 q PCT
                                                                                 B.S  GM/KG(  59. t GRAINSXLB)
                                                                      NUX HUMIDl TV f. .F .   . I.Hlb
OLD TRANSIENT
719
43

7b
7b.
8.
21 .
^
77.
3.
2.
•







. 3
.3
1
.5
2X
OX
ox
i/
2X
IX
IX
bX



1


1
(29.
(1111
1199
(27(1
2X
2X
3/
3X
3X 1
3X
2X
2X
9.10
b9
529
.37
1.9
3.05
7.12
5)
.0)

0.1)
7b
8
555
2
.41
.05
2
1







STABILIZED
749.3 (29.5)
719.3 (29.
12.8 (109
705bO
131.0 (4b2
20. IX 2X
8. 1/ 2X
b5.0X12X
1.3X12X
52. SX 3X
4.3X 3X
.8X 2X
.bX 2X
14.42
12
lib
.85
.2
.93
17. b9
5)
.0)

8.b)
2(1
8
122

-------
VEHICLE No.tn-in
VEHICLE MJDEl.    7H  VOLVO EK-LIJ
ENGINF ?.l LC130  CIO)  L-H
TRANSMISSION
GV^     II KG(     -II  LHS)


BA-ROMFTER 73R.3H  hM  HGC29.07 IN Ht)
ORY HIILB TEMP.  25.11  DEG C(77.ll DEG F)

BAG RESULTS
   BAG NUMBER
   HLO^'EF OIF  P MM.  H?0(IN. H20)
   HLO^EH ir.'LET P MM.  H?U(IN. M?0)
   BLOWER INLET TEMP.  DEG. CCDEG. F)
   HLOWER REVOLUTIONS
   cvs FLOW  sro.  cu.
                                                  TABLE      VFHICLF tMISSION  RESULTS
                                                                    SET
                                                    IEST NO. 1     RUN
                                                    DATE  7/27/78
                                                    TIME 1HI22
                                                    DYNO Nil.  3
                                                    CVS NO.    2
                                                    BAG CART NO.  1

                                                    RELATIVE HUMIDITY  -
                                                    ABSOLUTE HUMIDITY
CO
HC
HC
co
CO
CO?
co?
fiOX
NOX
       SAMPLE
       BCKGKD
       SAMPLE
       BCKGKD
       SAMPLE
       BCKGRD
       SAMPLE
       HCKGRl)
METEK/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/R/INGE/PPM
ME IFR/RANGE/PPM
ME FER/KANtiE/PCT
METER/RANUE/FCT
ffcTFP/RANGE/PPM
METEH/RANGE/PPM
                                                                                               PROJECT NO.  ll-t74b-IJIIl

                                                                                  TEST  WEIGHT   13bf KIH   1UUQ  LbS)
                                                                                  ACTUAL ROAD LOAD   8.t  K«(  11.3 HP)
                                                                                  GASOLINE EM-27H-F
                                                                                  ODOMtTEH     113
                                                                                1  PCT
                                                                                7.1  GM/KGC 55.b GRA1NS/LB)
                                                                                             NOX HUMIDITY  C.F.   .Slfab
                                                                  1
                                                           7*9.3 (.2S.S)
                                                           7fS,3 (?S.5)
                                                            f 3.3 (I in.O)
                                                           eilH.2 (7352.3)
31. b/ 2/
 R.ll/ 2/
95.7/1?/
 1.7/12/
                                                                      32
                                                                       B
                                                                     237
                                                                       3
                                                           80. a/ 3/ 1.H7
                                                            3.S/ 3/  .05
                                                            l.S/ 2/    2
        DILUTION  FACTOR
        HC   CfiMLfcNTRA riON PPM
        CO   CONCENTRATION PPM
        CO?  CONCENTRATION PCT
        NOX  CONCENTRATION PPM
                                            P.M3
                                            P25
                                                                 .7
        HC   MASS  GRAMS
        CO   MASS  GRAMS
        CO?  MASS  GRAMS
        NOX  MASS  GRAMS
                                             2.1-*
                                           5 * . 5 n
                                                                 .87
        hC   GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
        CO   GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
        CO?  GRAMS/KM (GHAMS/MILE)
        NOX  GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
        FUFL  CONSUMPTION BY CB L/1HOKM(MP&)
        CAlCULATf.C  DISTANCE KM (MILES)
                                          .If  (    .22)
                                        2.5b  (   t.J2)
                                       255.7  (  tll.H)
                                          .01  (    .02)
                                       11.10  (  21.19)
                                       21.27  (  13.22)

-------
       VfcMlLI t  '/il.t K-) II
       Vt>- I Cl t  ">iJl>( L
       t NT, | NF  c1 . I  L ( 1 }n
       i I»u PCT
                                                      AH30LUTE  HUMIDITY   8.t GM/KGC  SB.b GKAINS/LB)
                                                         NOX  HUMIDITY  C.I-.
^
       OA(, KFSUL1S
          HAT,  NIJKrtt K
                  I) IF P
                  IHLtr
                  IriLFT
CVS

HC
HC
CO
Cll
CO?
(II?
MOX
                 MM.  H?U(IN.  H?0)
                 P  MM.  H?0(IN.  HPO)
                 TF-Mp.  OEG. CfDtr,.  F)
         K  «(. VOLU T I IINS
        F-LUH STD.  CU.  MEIRtS(SCF)
SAMPl.fc
HCKGUl)
SAMPLt

SAMPLE
HCKGRD
               METF.H/KANGE/PPM
               M£U R/RANbE/PPM
               MtTEH/RANGE/PPM
               MF TtH/RANGE/PPM
               ME TFK/RANGE/PCT
               ME It H/RANUF/PCT
               Mt Tt KVHANGE/PPM
               METFR/RANGE/PPM
   niLUTIOIJ FACTOR
   HC   CONCF MRATK1N FPM
   CU   LUNCF NTRAT IQl-i PPM
   co?  CONCENTRATION PCT
   NOX  CUNCENTRAT ItIN PPM

   HC   MASS GRAMS
   Cll   MASS GrtAMS
   CO?  MASS GRAMS
   NOX  HA3S GRAMS

   HC   GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
   co   I.HAM.H/KM (GRAns/Kli E)
   CU?  GH4MS/KM (wRAMS/MLE)
   NUX  GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
   FHFL CONSUMPTION  6Y  CH L/KIIIKMIMPG)
   CALCULATED  DISTANCE  KM (MILES)
                                                         i
                                                 7 H q. .1 (? q. s)
                                                 74q.3 (eq.5)
                                                  H3. 3 ( J lll.n)
                                                     h I 581
                                                 11H.2 (H032.7)
35.8/  ?/

b8.ll/ I I/
 1 .0/1 I/
HI.e/  2/

 i.o/  e/
  .b/  2/

      7.31
       29
      270
    1.78
       .5


    35.qn
   371b.-»
       .1U

  .11  (
 2.12  (
  3b
   B
 28b
   3
1 .SO
 .03
   1
   1
                                                                          .18)
                                                                         3.H8)
                                                               ?iq.q  (  353.q)
                                                                  .111  (    .01)
                                                                q.st  (  si.bs)
                                                               ib.qo  (  in.so)

-------
 I
Ul
VEHICLE NU.EM-lt)
VEHICLE MUOEL    78 VOLVA  EM-IH
ENGINE 2.1  L(13U CHO L-4-
TRANSMISSION
GVW     I   KG(     -I) L6S)
BAROMETEP  ?Hl.f3 MM HG(21.JH  TN  Hb)
DRY BULB  fFHP.  21.1 DF.G Cl7M.fl [IK.-  F)

HAG RFSULrs
   PAR  N U ••> H E K
   DESCRIPTION
   HLflWER  OIF  F  MM. H2U(IN.  H?0)
   HLOfcER  INLET  P MM. HPOdN.  H20)
           INLET  TEMP. DEC.  CCDEG.  F)
           REVOLUTIONS
   CVS  r-LOrt  STO. CU. rETRES(SCF)
                                          TAHLE  A-3. VEHICLE  f-MISSION RESULTS
                                                            f rp

                                                    TEST NO.   2     RUN 1
                                                    DATE   7/2H/78
                                                    TIME 13:?1
                                                    PYNO MO.   3
                                                    CVS NO.    2
                                                    bAG CART  NO.   1
         HC
         HC
         CO
         CO
    SAMPLE
    PCKGRD
    SAMPLE
    BCKGHD
CO? SAMPLE
CO? HCKGRD
NOX SAMPLE
NOX BCKC5RO
               METER/RANtE/PPM
               METER/KANGE/PPM
               METER/RANGE/PPM
               METER/RANGE/PPM
               METER/RANGE/PCT
               HETER/RAN6E/PCT
               METER/RANGE/PPM
               METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
HC  CONCENTRATION PPM
CO  CO'vCENTRAl ION PPM
CO? CONCENTRATION PCT
NIW CONCENTRATION PPM

HC  MASS GRAMS
CO  MASS GRAMS
CO? MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS

HC  GRAMS/KM  (GRAMS/MLE)
CO
              (GRAMS/MILE)
CH? GKfiMS/KM  (GRAMS/MILE)
NIIX GRAMS/KM  (GRAMS/NILE)
                                                                                                                     PHOJECT  NU.  ll-tJH

                                                                                                        TEST  '1EIGH1    13bt KG(   3QUO LBS)
                                                                                                        ACTUAL  ROAD  LOAD   8.1  Kw(  11.3 HP)
                                                                                                        GASOLINE EM-e7t-K
                                                                                                        ODOMETER     1S7
                                                              RELATIVE HUMIDITY  ht  PCT
                                                              ABSOLUTE HUMIDITY  1U.?.  GM/KGC 71.7 GRAINS/LB)
                                                                                                          NOX  HUMinirr C.F
                                                                    J
                                                            COLD TRANSIENT
                                                             7 b 2 . f) ( 3 U . ())
                                                             -fbS.O ( 311. U )
                                                              t3.3 (1111.11)
               JN BY CB L/ JflllKM(MPG)
CALCULATED  DISTANCE KM (MILES)
                                                         .58 (   .Sf)
                                                        «l.tS ( IE..20)
                                                       335.5 ( 531. "O
                                                         .(IS (   .OR)
                                                       ) 5 . 0 3 ( J. 5 . h 5 )
                                                        S.B3 (  3.b8)
                                                                          STABILIZED
                                                                        7b5.0  (30.0)
                                                                        7ba.O  (3U.O)
                                                                         >>3.3  (110.0)
                                                                                    .57 (    .»3)
                                                                                   ».80 (   7.75)
                                                                                  Sfb.5 (  557.b)
                                                                                    .00 (    .00)
                                                                                  15.15 (  15.53)
                                                                                   b.13 (   3.81)
                                                                                             HOT TRANSIENT
                                                                                             7b2.0 (30.0)
                                                                                             7b2.(J (3U.O)
                                                                                              H3.3 (110.0)

75
87.
11.
28.
^
71.
3.
?.
•









HIISIS
.5 (2bbb
5/ 2/
n/ 2/

.3)
88
11
5/ 3/ bb1*
3/ 3/
b/ 3/ 1.
5/ 3/ .
B/ 2X
8/ 2/
8.7t
7H
h2b
l.tl
2.1
3.31
55. U*
115H.7
.30
7
Hb
US
3
1









blS^l
121.3 (tSbb
3H.O/ 2/
13. O/ 2/

.2)
31*
13
87.1/12/ 2U1
3.3/12/
5H.S/ 3/ .
H.U/ 3/ .
.BX 2/
,8/ 2/
13.70
22
115
.10
.1
l.bf
21. H2
2125.1
.01
b
15
Ob
1
1









tOSOb
75.3 (2bS1
HI. I/ 2/
10. 5/ 2/

.1
t2
10
Bl.1/12/ 188
l.t/12/
b7.2/ 3/ 1.
3.t/ 3/ .
.8/ 2/
.b/ 2/
10.10
32
178
l.lb
.3
1.H1
15.57
1511.1
.04
2
21
05
1
1









                                                                                               .2* (    .31)
                                                                                              2.b8 (  H.32)
                                                                                             275.7 ( HH3.5)
                                                                                               .01 (    .01)
                                                                                             11.18 ( 11.bf)
                                                                                              5.80 (  3.bl)
COMPOSITE  FTP RESULTS
    HC   GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)                   .33  (    .52)
    CO   GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)                  5.11  (   8.3H)
    CO?  GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)               d?t.51  (522.27)
    NOX  GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)                   .HI  (    .H2)
    FUEL CONSUMPTION BY  CB  L/KIUKM (MPlO     IH.?^  (  Jb.51)

-------
                                           TABLE  A-2. VEHICLE EMISSION RESULTS
                                                             FTPC
VEHICI F  NO.FM-1 (1
VEHICIF  MH|>F-|_   ?H VMLVO
LNGINir ?. I  LU3II CIO) L-H
TRANSMISSION Ml
(JVW     u KG(    -n LHS)
 BAROMFTFR  738.12  MM  HG(?1.0K  IN  HG)
 DRY  HUL«  TEMP.  ?b.l  OEG  C(79.0  F)EG F)

 BAG  RESULTS
   RAT,  NUMHEK
   DE.TCMIPTION
   BLOWF.R  OIF P MM.  H,?0(IN. H?0)
   BLOHER  INLET P  MM.  H?0(IN. HPO)
   HLOWER  INLET TEMP.  DEG.  CCDEG.  F)
   RLOWER  REVOLUTIONS
   CVS  FLOW  STD.  CU. METRFS(SCF)

   HC   SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
   HC   BCKGRD MFTFR/KANGE/PPM
   co   SAMPLE MKTER/RANGE/PPM
   co   bCKGRo MFTER/RANGE/PPM
   co?  SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
   co?  PCKGRD METER/RANGE/PCT
   NOX  SAMPLE MF.TER/RANGE/PPM
   NOX  HCKGRD MFTFR/RANGE/PPM

   DILUTION  FACTOR
   HC   COMCFNTRATION PPM
   CO   CONCENTRATION PPM
   co?  CONCENTRATION PCT
   NOX  CONCENTRATION PPM

   HC   MASS  GRAMS
   CO   MASS  GRAMS
   CO?  MASS  GRAMS
   NOX  MASS  GRAMS

   HC   GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
   co   GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
   COP  GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
   NOX  GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
   FUFL CONSUMPTION BY CB L/inHKM(MPG)
   CALCULATED DISTANCE KM (MILES)

COMPOSITE FTP RESULTS
   HC  GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
   CO  GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
   C02 GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
   NOX GRAMS/KM (URAMS/MILF)
   FUFL CONSUMPTION HY CB L/lnliKM  (MPG)
   .Ib (
  l.»8 (
2R5.37
   .Ib
           TEST NO.  3
           DATE  8/21/78
           TIME lf:?7
           DYNO NO.  2
           CVS NO.   7
           BAR CART NO.
RUN 1
                                                                                                           PROJECT NO.  Il-t7«»b-0lll

                                                                                              TEST HEIGHT   13bH KG(   3000  LBS)
                                                                                              ACTUAL ROAD LOAD   8.t KW(  11.3  HP)
                                                                                              GASOLINE
                                                                                              ODOMETER
                                                     RELATIVE HUMIDITY t 7 PCT
                                                     ABSOLUTE HUMIDITY 10.2 GM/KG(  71.5  GRAINS/LB)
                                                               NOX  HUMIDITY  C.F.   .18HD
                                                   COLD TRANSIENT
                                                   lbon.2 (b3.D)
                                                   lf>7.8 (57.0)
                                                     H3.3 (lln.D)
                                                        10310
                                                     b3.7 (2251.t)
R8.3/ 2/
lb.1/ 2/
11.7/11/
2.7/11/
82. h/ 3/ 1
3.0/ 3/
11. I/ 2/
.3/ 2/
B.tb
7»
505
1.H8
10.8
2.72
37.50
R8
Ib
53b
8
.52
.05
11
0







                                                         1.30
                                                          (
                    .7b)
                                                     b.St ( in.52)
                                                    302.0 ( YB5.1)
                                                      .P3 (   ,3b)
                                                    13.31 ( 17.57)
                                                     5.73 (  3.5b)
                                                     .2h)
                                                    2.31)
                                                     .2b)
                                STABILIZED
                             Ib00.2 (b3.0)
                             1HH7.B (57.0)
                               »3.3 (110.0)
                                  17715
                              101.2 (3855.7)
                                                                        21.I/ 2/
                                                                        1H.O/ 2/
                                                                          7.2/13/
                                                                        SH.O/  3/
                                                                          3.2/  3/
                                                                          H.8/  2/
                                                                           .3/  2/
                                         21
                                         1*
                                           7
                                           5

                                         '.05
                                           5
                                           0
       8
       3
     .10
     1.S

      .51
      .33
   1717.7
      .13

  .08 (   .13)
  .05 (   .08)
210.3 ( Hb7.0)
  .15 (   .2*)
12.to ( 18.17)
 b.11 (  3.85)
                        HOT TRANSIENT
                       Ib00.2 (b3.0)
                       1HH7.8 (57.0)
                         H3.3 (110.0)
                            103bB
                         b3.b (22tb,5)

                        23.I/ 2/   2H
                        11.I/ 2/   12
                        37.0/13/   35
                         t.3/13/    1
                        73.I/ 3/ 1.3f
                         3.5/ 3/   .05
                         b.S/ 2/    7
                           .3/ 2/    0

                             1.13
                              13
                              30
                            1.30
                             b.2
                                                      1501.2
                                                         .75
                          .08  (
                          .3^  (
                        2b3.b  (
                          .13  (
                                                             .It)
                                                             .b2)
                                                              .l)
                                                             .21)
                                                   11.21  (  20. 81*)
                                                    S.73  (   3.5b)
                                           1?.30 ( 11.12)

-------
 VEHICI E NO.EM-.Lll
 VEHICLE MODEL   7R  VOLVlJ  -
 ENGINE 2.1 L(130 CID)  L-f
 TRANSMISSION
 GVh     0 KG(    -n LHS)
 BAROMFTER 7MU.9.2 MM HG(r>H.l?  IN  HG)
 DRY BULH TEMP, 24.4 DhG  C(7b.ll  DEG F)
 BAG RESULTS
    RAG NUMBER
    DESCRIPTION
    BLOWFR OIF P
           INLET
           INLET
                                     TABLE A-l.  VEHICLE EMISSION  RESULTS
                                                       FTP

                                               TEST NO.  4     RUN  1
                                               DATE  8/30/78
                                               TIME 14:12
                                               DYNO NO.  2
                                               CVS NO.   7
                                               BAG CART NO.   1
    CVS
         MM. H2U(IU.  H2U)
         P MM. HPn(IN.  H?0)
         TFMP. Dtr;.  C(OEG.  F)
   REVOLUTIONS
FLU* STD. CIJ. METRES(SCF)





1
-J

HC SAMpLE
HC BCKC-Rl)
CO SAMPLE
CO UCKGRD
CO? SAMPLE
CiJ? BCKGRD
NOX SAMPLE
NOX BCKGRD
               METER/RANUE/PPM
               METtR/RANGE/PPM
               METER/RANGE/PPM
               MfcTFR/RANGE/PPM
               MEJER/KANGE/PCT
               METER/RANGE/PCT
               METFR/RANGE/PPM
               MEIER/RANGE/PPM
    DILUTION  FAC10K
    HC  CONCENTRATION  PPM
    CO  CONCENTRATION  PPM
    CO? CONCENTRATION  PCT
    NOX CONCENTRATION  PPM

    HC  MASS  GKAMS
    CO  MASS  GRAMS
    CO? MASS  GRAMS
    NOX MASS  GRAMS

    HC  GRAMS/KM  (GRAMS/MILE)
    co  GRAMS/KM  (GRAMS/MILE)
    CO? GRAMS/KM  (GRAMS/MIIF)
    NOX GRAMS/KM  (GRAMS/MILE)
    FUEL CONSUMPTION BY CB L/1HOKM(MPG)
    CALCULATED  DISTANCE KM (MILES)

 COMPOSITE  FTP  RESULTS
    HC  GRAMS/KM  (GRAMS/MILE)
    CO  GRAMS/KM  (GRAMS/MILE)
    CO? GRAMS/KM  (GRAMS/MILE)
    NOX GRAMS/KM  (GRAMS/MILE)
    FUEL CONSUMPTION BY CH L/1I1MKM (MPG)
 ERROR  UHtntl      JPH3H7H HtlS
                                                                    PROJECT  NO.  ll-474b-001

                                                       TEST WEIGHT   13b4  KG(   3000 LBS)
                                                       ACTUAL ROAD LOAD    8.4  KW(  11.3 HP)
                                                       GASOLINE
                                                       ODOMETER     157
                                               RELATIVE HUMIDITY  59  PCT
                                               ABSOLUTE HUMIDITY  11.b  GM/KG(  81.3 GRAINS/LB)
                                                                  NOX HUMIDITY  C.F.  l.OSOb
                    1
            COLD TRANSIENT
            Ib00.2 (b3.0)
                   (58.0)
                .7 (107.0)
                 103BS
                                                   8. 77
                                                    b3
                                                   f 89
                                                  I.1*?
                                                   9.7
                                                  3b.51
                                                 Ibb2.9
                                                    1.22

                                                .41 (    .bb)
                                               b.42 (  10.32)
                                              292.2 (  470.2)
                                                .21 (    .35)
                                              12. 9b (  18.15)
                                               S.b9 (  3.54)
     1.38 (  2.22)
   P8P..08 (453. Bb)
      .15 (   .25)
    12.15 ( 19.35)
       COLD TRANSIENT
   STABILIZED
lbQO.2 (b3.0)
1*73.2 (58.0)
  H3.3 (110.0)
     177bO
 109.1 (3854.3)
                                      14.2b
                                        10
                                         2
                                       .88
                                       3.9

                                        .b4
                                        .25
                                     1758.4
                                        .85

                                    .10 (    .17)
                                    .04 (    .07)
                                  285.1 (  458.8)
                                    .14  (
           .22)
                                  12.19  (  19.30)
                                   b.17  (   3.83)
 HOT TRANSIENT
Ib00.2 (b3.0)
       (58.0)
  43.3 (110.0)
     10383
  b3.8 (2253.2)
75. 3/ 2/
13. 5/ 2/
18.8/U/
5.0/11/
80. O/ 3/
t.O/ 3/
10. I/ 2/
.5/ 2/
75
13
527
15
1.H7
.Ob
10
1
IS. I/ 2/
10. 5/ 2/
10.7/13/
9.0/13/
53. b/ 3/
t.O/ 3/
H.4/ 2/
.5/ 2/
eo
10
10
s
.«H
.Ob
4
1
20. 7/ 2/
S.I/ 2/
17.3/13/
b.2/13/
7f.H/ 3/
3.S/ 3/
fa.S/ 2/
,t/ 2/
21
S
17
b
1.35
.05
7
0
      1.87
       13
       10
     1.31
      b.l

       .4b
       .78
    1525.7
       .77

   .08 (   .13)
   .14 (   .22)
 2b8.b ( 432.2)
   .14 (   .22)
 11.48 ( 20.48)
  S.bB (  3.53)
                                                        CT  404V-8
                                                                          SFMARL  01]  END OF RECORD
*LINE NO.11
ERROR NUMBER
             *EI
-------
                                            TABLE
 VEHICLE  NO.  FMin
 VEHICLF  MODFL    7R  VOLVO ?H«tr>L
 FNGINF  f.1  L fI3n CID)  L-Y
 TRANSMISSION  43
 C.VW      0  KT,f     -n LRS)
 BAROMfTER  7»?.'»H  MM HG(?9.83 IN HG)
 DRY  BULB  T£Mp.  ?^.B DEC C(73.n DEC F)

 BAG  RESULTS
   HAG  NUMBER
   DESCRIPTION
   BLOWER  OTF P MM, H?OUN.  H?O)
   BLOWER  INLET P MM.  H?O(IN.  H?O)
   BLOWER  INLET TEMP.  OEG.  C»8
           RELATIVE HUMIDITY bl PCT
           ABSOLUTE HUMIDITY in.q GM/KGC 7b.l GRAINS/LB)
                                          NOX HUMIDITY C.F .  1.00«.H
                 1
         COLD TRANSIENT
          7b?.0 (30.0)
          7t,?.0 (30.0)
           H3.3 (UO.O)
              »0575
                 75. b (?bbB,7)

                lb.3/ ?/   lb
                1?.9/ ?/   13
                 b.7/U/    7
                 B.0/13/    ?
                bl.7/ 3/ 1.10
                 ».?/ 3/  ,0b
                 5. 1/ 2/    5
                                                         H
                                                         H
                                                      1.0*
                                           1H35.B
                                              ,b5

                                          .03 (   .05)
                                          .07 (   .11)
                                        251.3 ( 401.3)
                                          .11 (   ,18)
                                        10.73 ( 21,92)
                                         5,71 (  3,55)
                                                                                                             SET -7
                                                                                                         7b?.0 (30.0)
                                                                                                         7b?.D (30.0)
                                                                                                          H3.3 (110.0)
                                                                                                         208.* (7359,?)
                                                  lb.7/ ?/
                                                  11. 5/ ?/
                                                   8.7/13/
                                                                                  17
                                                                                  11
                                                                                  8
                                                                                  3
                                                                       4, b/  3/  l,3b
                                                                       3.3/  3/   .05
                                                                       7.5/  ?/    8
                                                       9.85
                                                         b
                                                         b
                                                      1.31
                                                                            l.HO
                                                                         5009.5
                                                                            2.79
                                                    ,0»
                                                    ,07
                                                  233.5
                                                    .13
                                                   9.98
                                                  Sl.tS
                                              .Ob)
                                              .11)
                                            375.7)
                                              .21)
                                            23. Si)
                                            13.33)
COMBINED FUEL ECONOMY L/inoKM
                                            11.30  (  20.B3)

-------
                                           TABLE
                                                      VEHIcLF EMISSION RESULTS
                                                             HFET
                                                                                            PROJECT  NO.  ll-H7fb-001
VEHICLE NO.
VEHICLE MODEL   78 VOLVO
ENGINE ?.l L(13n CID) L-t
TRANSMISSION A3
GVW     0 KGf    -0 LBS)
BAROMETER 7«M.bB MM HG(?9.?0 IN HG)
DRY BULB TEMp. ?3'.3 DEC CC7H.O DEC F

BAG RESULTS
   BAG NUMBER
   BLOWER DIF P MM. H?0(IN. H?0)
   BLOWER INLET P MM. HPOHN. H?0)
   BLOWER INLET TEMP. DEG'. C(DEG. F)
   BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
   cvs FLOW STD'. cu. METRES(SCF)
   HC  SAMPLE
   HC  8CKGRD
   CO  SAMPLE
   CO  BCKGRD
   CO? SAMPLE
   CO? BCKGRO
   NOX SAMPLE
   NOX BCKGRO
MFTER/RANGE/PPM
MPTER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PCT
METER/RANGE/PCT
MFTER/RANGE/PPM
METF.R/RANGE/PPM
   DILUTION FACTOR
   HC  CONCENTRATION PPM
   CO  CONCENTRATION PPM
   CO? CONCENTRATION PCT
   NOX CONCENTRiTION PPM

   HC  MASS GRAMS
   CO  MASS RRAMS
   CO? MASS GRAMS
   NOX MASS GRAMS

   HC  GRAMS/KM  (GRAMS/MILE)
   CO  GRAMg/KM  (GRAMS/MILE)
   CO? GRAMS/KM  (GRAMS/MILE)
   NOX GRAMS/KM  (GRAMS/MILE)
   FUEL CONSUMPTION BY CB L/100KM(MPG)
   CALCULATED DISTANCE KM (MILES)
 TEST MO.  5     RUN 3
 DATE  9/19/78
 TIME
 DYNO NO.   3
 CVS NO.    ?
 BAG CART  NO.   i
                                                                               TEST WEIGHT    mt  KGC   3000 LBS)
                                                                               ACTUAL  ROAD  LOAD   8.*  KW(  11.3 HP)
                                                                               GASOLINE   EM-?7f-F
                                                                               ODOMETER       -0
                                       RELATIVE HUMIDITY 51  PCT
                                       ABSOLUTE HUMIDITY  9.3 GM/KG(  bH.9 GRAINS/LB)
                                             1
                                      7h?.0 (30.0)
                                      7b?.0 (30.0)
                                       H3.3 (llfl.O)
                                                    NOX HUMIDITY C.F,   .95HB
                                      lit. 5 (fOtH.5)
18. 9/ ?/
 9.8/ ?/
 9.J/13/
           10
            9
            3
9?.3/ 3/ 1.73
 3.5/ 3/  .05
15. 3/ ?/   IS
  .I/ ?/    1

     7.75
      10
       b
    l.t.8
                                            .bB
                                            .."
                                         352?. b
                                        .Of
                                        .05
                                       it.8
                                        .n
                                       9.18
          .07)
          .08)
        3*5.7)
          .30)
        ?5.b3)
        10.19)

-------
                                            TABLE
 VFHICLE NO.  EMIO
 VEHICLE MOOFL   78 VOLVO
 ENC.INE  ?. i  LUSH ciD)  V-B
 TRANSMISSION A3
 CVW     n  KG(    -I) LBS)
 BAROMETER 7*0.HI  MM HG(21.15 IN HG)
 DRY  BULB TEMP.  23.q OEG C(75.0 DEC F)

 BAG  RESULTS
    BAG  NUMBER
    DESCRIPTION
    BLOWER OIF  P MM. H?0(IN.  H?0)
    BLOWER INLET P MM.  H?O(IN.  H?O)
    BLOWER INLET TEMP.  OEG.  C(OEG. F)
    BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
    CVS  FLOW STO.  CU.  METRES(SCF)
               METER/RANGE/PPM
               METER/RANGE/PPM
               METER/RANGE/PPM
               METER/RANGE/PPM
               METER/RANGE/PCT
               METER/RANGE/PCT
               METER/RANGE/PPM
               METER/RANGE/PPM
    DILUTION  FACTOR
    HC   CONCENTRATION  PPM
    CO   CONCENTRATION  PPM
    COS  CONCENTRATION  PCT
    NOX  CONCENTRATION  PPM

    HC   MASS  GRAMS
    CO   MASS  GRAMS
    CO?  MASS  GRAMS
    NOX  MASS  GRAMS

    HC   GRAMS/KM  (GRAMS/MILE)
    CO   GRAMS/KM  (GRAMS/MILE)
    CO?  GRAMS/KM  (GRAMS/MILE)
    NOX  GRAM3/KM  (CRAMS/MILE)
    FUEL CONSUMPTION BY CB L/100KMCMPG)
    CALCULATED DISTANCE KM (MILES)

COMPOSITE FTP RESULTS
    HC  GRAMS/KM  (GRAMS/MILE)
   CO  GRAMS/KM  (GRAMS/MILE)
   co? GRAMS/KM  (GRAMS/MILE)
   NOX GRAMS/KM  (GRAMS/MILE)
   FUEL CONSUMPTION BY CB L/10DKM  (MPG)
1
0
HC
HC
CO
CO
CO?
CO?
NOX
NOX
SAMPLE
BCKGRO
SAMPLE
BCKGRD
SAMPLE
BCKGRD
SAMPLE
BCKGRO
             VEHICLE EMISSION RESULTS
                   FTP  SET

            TEST  NO. 6    RUN 1
            DATE   1/20/78
            TIME  121*5
            DYNO  NO.   3
            CVS NO.    Z
            BAG CART NO.   1
                                  PROJECT NO. ll-*7*b-0fll

                     TEST WEIGHT   i3b* KGC  BOOO LBS)
                     ACTUAL ROAD LOAD   8.* KW(  11.3  HP)
                     GASOLINE  EM-27*-F
                     ODOMETER    307b
                     IN STOCK CONDITION
           RELATIVE HUMIDITY *8 PCT
           ABSOLUTE HUMIDITY  S.I GM/KGC b3.* GRAINS/LB)
                                NOX HUMIDITY C.F.   .1*83
         COLD  TRANSIENT
           7*1.3  (21.5)
           7»1.3  (21.5)
            *3.3  (110.0)
               HObOS
            75.5  (?bb7.H)
            .H3 (   ,b«O
           1.52 ( 15.3?)
          303.b ( *B8.»)
            .1* (   .23)
          13.bS ( 17.23)
           5.7? (  3.5b)
   .17 (   .27)
  f.13 (  b.b*)
285.7? (*51.7?)
   .Ob (   .01)
 J?.*1 ( 18.83)
  STABILIZED
7*1.3 (21.5)
7*1.3 (21.5)
 *3.3 (110.0)
    b1b*3
121.5 (*57*.3)
HOT TRANSIENT
7*1.3 (21.5)
7*1.3 (21.5)
 *3.3 (110.0)
    *0b*1
 75.b (2b70.*)
  .11 (   .17)
 3.25 (  5.23)
211.5 ( *b1.0)
  .01 (   .02)
12.b7 ( 18.5b)
 b.01 (  3.71)
  .01 (   .1*)
 l.bB (  2.71)
2bl.S ( *20.7)
  .08 (   .12)
11.28 ( 20.85)
 5.70 (  3.5*)
       *
    SET-7
7*1.3  (21.5)
7*1.3  (21.5)
 *3.3  (110.0)
   112352
201.0  (7380.3)
bS.
10.
27.
4
72.
3.
7.
1.









I/ Z/
5/ ?/
I/ 3/
?/ 3/
O/ 3/
b/ 3/
O/ ?/
I/ 2/
1.75
Sb
bll
1.2b
b.O
2.*b
S*.*7
173b.*
.82
bb
10
b50
5
1.30
.Ob
7
1









Ib.B/ Zf
8.7/ 2/
b3.5/12/
*.0/12/
*b.b/ 3/
3.7/ 3/
,8/ Zl
.S/ 2/
lb.31
1
131
.75
.3
.b*
11.82
1775.7
.08
17
1
1*?
7
.80
.Ob
1
1









IB
7
53
3
b3
3
*










.b/ 2/
.b/ ?/
.*/!?/
.2/12/
.3/ 3/ 1
,8/ 3/
.O/ 2/
.I/ 2/
11.73
12
101
l.OB
3.2
.51
1.58
1*81.1
.**
H
8
118
b
L.13
.Ob
*
1


2b
8
13
.O/
.3/
• * f A
2/
2/
a/
2.5/12/
?b
3
*



.2/
.8/
.*/
.&/
1

3/ 1
3/
2/
2/
.*7
11
2b
B
??B
*
1.31
.Ob
*
1


215








1.
*
2
52
3*
.0
.2*
.2*




512*. 1


1
.50

  .10 (   .17)
 2.*3 (  3.11)
238.1 ( 383.1)
  .07 (   .11)
10.3* ( 22.75)
21,!>2 ( 13.37)
COMBINED FUEL ECONOMY L/100KH (MPG)
 11.52 ( S0.»l)

-------
VEHICLE NO. EM10
VEHICLE MODEL   78 VOLVO 2H1DL
ENGINE 2.1 L(130 CID) L-t
TRANSMISSION A3
GVW     U KG(    -0 IBS)
BAROMETER 710.tl MM HG(21.15 IN HG)
DRY BULB TEMP. 23.1 DEG C(75.0 DEG F)

BAG RESULTS
   BAG NUMBER
   BLOWER DIF P MM. H20(IN. H20)
   BLOWER INLET P MM. H20dN. HSO)
   RLOWER INLET TEMP. DEG. C(DEG. F)
   BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
   CVS FLOW STD. CU. METRES(SCF)
                                        TABLE      VEHICLE EMISSION RESULTS
                                                          HFET

                                                  TEST NO.  £    RUN 3
                                                  DATE  1/20/78
                                                  TIME
                                                  DYNO NO.  3
                                                  CVS NO.   2
                                                  BAG CART NO.  1
HC
HC
CO
CO
    SAMPLE
    BCKGRD
    SAMPLE
    BCKGRD
C02 SAMPLE
C02 BCKGRD
NOX SAMPLE
NOX BCKGRD
              METER/RANGE/PPM
              METER/RANGE/PPM
              METER/RANGE/PPM
              METER/RANGE/PPM
              METER/RANGE/PCT
              METER/RANGE/PCT
              METER/RANGE/PPM
              METER/RANGE/PPM
   DILUTION FACTOR
   HC  CONCENTRATION PPM
   CO  CONCENTRATION PPM
   C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
   NOX CONCENTRATION PPM

   HC  MASS GRAMS
   CO  MASS GRAMS
   C02 MASS GRAMS
   NOX MASS GRAMS

   HC  GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
   CO  GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
   C02 GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
   NOX GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
   FUEL CONSUMPTION BY CB L/100KM(MPG)
   CALCULATED DISTANCE KM (MILES)
                                                                                                       PROJECT  NO.  ll-H7>»b-001

                                                                                          TEST  HEIGHT    13bt  KG(   3000 LB3)
                                                                                          ACTUAL ROAD  LOAD   8.t  KW(  11.3 HP)
                                                                                          GASOLINE   EM27H-F
                                                                                          ODOMETER       -0
                                                  RELATIVE HUMIDITY
                                                  ABSOLUTE HUMIDITY
                                                 7-H.3 (29.5)
                                                 7*1.3 (21.5)
                                                  H3.3 (110.0)
                                                     blbBl
                                                 II1*.? (1052.3)
                                                                       PCT
                                                                     1.1 GM/KG( b3.f GRAIN8/LB)
NOX HUMIDITY C.F.   .1t83
33. 5/ 2/
1.7/ 2/
71.3/11/
.8/11/
13. 7/ 3/
3. I/ 3/
I.I/ 2/
l.O/ 2/
7.1'
25
210
1.70
33
10
307
2
1.7b
.Ob
5
1
1



                                                      l.bb
                                                     36.70
                                                    3580.1
                                                       .81

                                                   .10 (   .lb)
                                                  2.37 (  3.82)
                                                 21S.H ( 353.0)
                                                   .05 (   .08)
                                                  1.5H ( 2f.fa?)
                                                 lb.32 ( 10.lt)

-------
 vt HICI F  NO.  tmn
 VfHlfLe  MUIX L    7«  VOLVU
 tur, If'F  a.l  L(13fl  CIO)  L-4
 TRANSMISSION A3
 GVW      ii  KT,(     -ii LBS)
                              TABLE       VEHICLE  EMISSION  RESULTS
                                               FTP

                                        TEST  NO.  7     RUN 1
                                        DATE   9/?l/78
                                        TIME  13t?5
                                        DYNO  NO.   3
                                        CVS NO.    2
                                        BAG CART  NO.   1
                 HG(29.23  IN  HG)
 BiROhflfR  Jta.HM  MM HG(29.23 IN HG)
 DRY  hllLH  TEMP.  21.1 OEG C(7U.O OEG F)

 HAG  PFSl'LTS
   RAG  NUMBFK
   DESCRIPTION
   HLOHER  DIF P MM. H?0(IN.  H20)
   HLOHEH  INLET P MM.  H?O(IN.  H?O)
   HLOWER  INLET IEMP.  DEG.  C(DEG.  F)
   HLUHER  REVOLUTIONS
   CVS  FLUK  STH.  CU.  METRES(SCF)
                                                                                                        PROJECT  NU.  ll->»7>tb-0ni

                                                                                           TEST WEIGHT    13bH  KG(   3000 LBS)
                                                                                           ACTUAL ROAD LOAD    a.*  KH(  11.3 HP)
                                                                                           GASOLINE  EM-?7*-F
                                                                                           ODOMtTER    3118
                                                                                           1 MINUTE OF AIR INJECTION INTO MANIFOLD
                                        RELATIVE  HUMIDITY  bo  PCT
                                        ABSOLUTE  HUMIDITY   S.b  GM/KGC  bb.1 GRAlNS/LB)
                                                                                                      NOX HUMIDITY  C.F.   .Sb33
                                      COLD  TRANSIENT
                                       7H9.3  (29.5)
                                       7*9.3  (29.5)
                                        *3.3  (110.0)
                                           *OB12
                                        7b.2  (2b89.B)
  STABILIZED
7*9.3 (29.5)
7*9.3 (29.5)
 *2.8 (109.0)
    b9bl*
130.0 (H590.9)
                                                                                          HOT TRANSIENT
                                                                                          7*9.3 (29.5)
                                                                                          7»9.3 (29.5)
                                                                                           »3.3 (110.0)
                                                                                           75.8 (2b77.S)
   HC
   HC
   CO
   CO
    SAMPLE
    BCKGKU
    SAMPLE
    BCKGRO
CO? SAMPLE
CO? BCKGRD
NOX SAMPLE
NOX 8CKGHD
METER/RANGE/PPM
METFR/RANGE/PPM
ME TER/RANGE/PPM
ME. fER/RANGE/PPM
MEIER/RANGE/PCT
METER/RANGE/PCT
METER/RANGE/PPM
MF TER/RANGE/PPM
   DILUTION  FACTOR
   HC  CONCENTRATION  PPM
   CO  CONCENTRATION  PPM
   co? CONCENTRATION  PCT
   NOX CONCENTRAI ION  PPM

   HC  MASS  GHAMS
   CO  MASS  GRAMS
   CO? MASS  GRAMS
   NOX MASS  GHAMS

   HC  GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
   Co  GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
   CO? GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
   NOX GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
   FUEL CONSUMPTION BY CH  L/1()OKM(MPG)
   CALCULATED DISTANCE KM  (MJLES)

COMPOSITE FTP RESULTS
   HC  GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
   CO  GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
   CO? URAMS/KM (GRAns/MlLE)
   NOX GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
   FUEL CONSUMPTION BY CB  L/10QKM  (MPG)
bS.8/ 2/
10. 9/ ?/
32. ?/ 3/
.!/ 3/
70. 7/ 3/ ]
3.2/ 3/
S.I/ 2/
.b/ 2/
9.87
5b
721
1.23
*.b
2.*b
b3.90
1721. b
.fa*
bb
11
75b
2
1.28
.OS
5
1









15. 8/ 2/
9.B/ 2/
9b.0/13/
3.0/13/
*b.*/ 3/
3.9/ 3/
.B/ 2/
.?/ 2/
Ifa.Sb
7
92
.7*
.1
.H9
13.87
17bb.l
.03
Ifa
10
98
3
.80
.Ob
1
1









                                        .*3 (
                                      11.12 ( 17.89)
                                      299.b ( *82.0)
                                        .11 (    .18)
                                      13.59 ( 17.31)
                                       5.75 (  3.57)
                                          .15  (    .?t)
                                         3.95  (  b.35)
                                       281.77  (H53.3b)
                                          .05  C    .08)
                                        IS.31  ( 11.11)
  .08 (   .13)
 2.27 (  3.fab)
289.3 ( tbS.S)
  .01 (   .01)
12.51 ( 18.80)
 b.10 (  3.79)
19. 2/ 2/
10. b/ 2/
51.3/12/
 1.2/12/
                                19
                                11
                               113
                                 2
                    b2.0/ 3/  1.10
                     3.9/ 3/   .Ob
                     ».0/ 2/     f
                      ,5/ 2/     1

                        12.01
                           9
                         107
                        1.05
                         3.5

                          .tl
                         9.43
                                                                                            .07 (    .12)
                                                                                           l.bS (  2.b5)
                                                                                          25*. 2 ( *09.0)
                                                                                            .09 (    .1H)
                                                                                          10.97 ( 21. H5)
                                                                                           5.72 (  3.5b)

-------
                                            TABLE
                                                       VEHICLE EMISSION RESULTS
                                                              CFTP 3 BAG
I
Ul
VEHICLE NO.   10
VEHICLE MODEL   78 VOLVO  8ft  PL
ENGINE 5. I  L(13ll CID) L-t
TRANSMISSION A3
GVW     n KG(    -fi LOS)
BAROMETER 7*5.1=1 MM HG(?q.35  IN  HG)
OKY BULB TEMP. 55.3 DEG Cf.73.1.1 f>E&  F)

BAG RESULTS
   RAG NUM8F.K
   DESCRIPTION
   BLOUEK DIP f MM. HgOCIN.  H50)
   BLOWER INLET H MM. HSUCIN. HSU)
   BLOwhR INLET TEMP. OEG. C(DEG.  F)
   BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
   CVS FLUM SID. CO. METRES(SCF)
        HC
        HC
        co
        CO
SAMpLE
BCKGRD
SAMPLE
BCKGRD
        C05 SAMPLE
        NOX SAMPLE
        NOX BCKGRD
              MElF.R/RANGE/ppM
              MET ER/RANGE/PPM
              METER/RANGE/PPM
              MtlER/RANGE/PPM
              METER/RANL-iE/PCT
              MEIER/HANGE/PCT
              METER/RANGE/PPM
              ME1ER/RANGE/PPM
   DILimuN FACTOR
   HC  CUNCErjlRATION  PPM
   CO  CONCENTRATION  PPM
   C05 CONCENTRATION  PCT
   NOX CONCENTRATION  PPM

   HC  MASS GRAMS
   CO  MASS GRAMS
   CU5 MASS GRAMS
   NOX MASS GRAMS

   HC  GRAMS/KM  (GKAMR/MILE)
   Co  GRAMS/KM  (GKAMS/MILE)
   C05 GRAMS/KM  (GRAMS/MILE)
   NOX GRAMS/KM  (GRAMS/MILE)
   FUEL CONSUMPTION BY  Cti  L/100KM(MPG)
   CALCULATED DISTANCE  KM  (MILES)

COMPOSITE FTP RESULTS
   HC  GRAMS/KM  (GRAMS/MILE)
   CO  GRAMS/KM  (GRAMS/MILE)
   CO? GRAMS/KM  (GRAMS/MILE)
   NOX GRAMS/KM  (URAMS/MILE)
   FUEL CONSUMPTION BY  CH  L/100KM  (MPG)
                                                           TEST NO.  8
                                                           OAfE  9X39X78
                                                           TIME
                                                           DYNO NO.  3
                                                           CVS NO.    3
                                                           BAG CART NO.
                                                              RUN 1
              PROJECT NO.  Il-f7*fa-001

 TEST HEIGHT   13bt KG(   3000  LBS)
 ACTUAL ROAD LOAD   8.* KW(  11.3  HP)
 GASOLINE
 ODOMETER    3188
  IN STOCK CONDITION WITH CO ADJUSTMENT
                                                           RELATIVE HUMIDITY 58 PCT
                                                           ABSOLUTE HUMIDITY 10.2 GM/KG( 71.3 GRAINS/LB)
                                                                                                   NOX  HUMIDITY  C.F.   .9829
                                                         COLD TRANSIENT
                                                          711.3 (58.0)
                                                          b85.8 (37.0)
                                                           •ft.* (118.0)
                                                              H0b3b
                                                           7b.3
                                                   .05  (    .03)
                                                  1.33  (   1.98)
                                                557.37  (Hit.11)
                                                   .37  (    .bO)
                                                 U.07  (  ?1.25)
                                                                    STABILIZED
                                                                  711.2 (28.0)
                                                                  bSB.5 (37.5)
                                                                   •»3.3 (110.0)
                                                                      blbtB
                                                                  130.8 (Hbll.3)
HOT TRANSIENT
711.3 (28.0)
b18.5 (37.5)
 Hf.H (112.0)
 7b.O (2b82.7)
52
30
83
3
b3
3
33
1










5
3b

11
5
.bX 2X
.IX 2X
.9X11X
.OX11X
.*X 3X 1
.qx sx
.HX 2X
.HX 2X
11. tl
3t
371
l.OB
21.1
1.51
33. q?
1503.3
3.03
.27 (
.81 ( 9
H.q ( 43
.53 (
.73 ( 30
.b7 ( 3
S3
30
sqs
q
.13
.Ob
32
1









.43)
.35)
b.2)
.8b)
.05)
.53)
10.
IS.
9.
9.
f 3.
4.
7.
1.









™ •
•
2b4
•
11.
b.
IX 2X
bX 2X
BX13X
5X13X
3X 3X .
BX 3X .
9X 3X
IX 2X
18.07
-S
1
.b?
b.q
-.35
.10
IbDH.O
i.bq
Ob ( -.
03 (
.b ( 425
28 (
29 ( 20.
Ob ( 3.
10
Ib
9
q
74
07
8
1









oq)
03)
.7)
45)
84)
77)
11.
It.
10.
7.
58.
4.
18.
1.









m •
•
238
•
10.
5.
SX 2X
7X 2X
5X13X
bX13X
5X 3X 1.
4X 3X .
IX 2X
OX 2X
12. q*
-2
3
.q?
17.2
-.09
.27
1350.*
2.45
02 ( -.
OS (
.1 ( 383
H3 (
17 ( 23.
b7 ( 3.
11
15
10
7
03
07
IB
1









03)
OB)
.2)
70)
1*)
52)

-------
                                            TABLE
 VEHICLE  NO.    in
 VEHICLE  MOOFL    'n  VOLVO ?H*  DL
 ENGINE  ?.l  Lflln CIO)  L-1
 TRANSMISSION A3
 GVW      0  KT.f     -o Lf<3)
 BAROMFTER  7*1.Hi  MM  HG(?9.19  IN  HG)
 DRY  HULB  TEMP.  >*.*  DEG  c(7b.o DEC  ft

 BAG  RESULTS
   BAG  NUMREO
   DESCRIPTION
   BLOWER  OIF  P MM.  H?OUN. H?O)
   BLOWER  INLET P  MM.  H?0(IN. H?0)
   BLOWER  INLET TEMP.  DEG.  CCOEG. F)
   BLOWER  REVOLUTIONS
   cvs  FLOW  STD.  cu. METRES(SCF)
HC
HC
CO
CO
    SAMpLF
    BCKORO
    SAMpLF
    BCK(JBr>
CO? SAMPLE
CO? BCKGRO
NOX SAMPLE
NOX BCKORO
               MFTER/RANGE/PPM
               MFTER/RANGE/PPM
               MFTER/RANGE/PPM
               MFTER/RANGE/PPM
               MFTER/RANGE/PCT
               MFTER/RANGE/PCT
               MFTER/RANGE/PPM
               MFTER/RANGE/PPM
   DILUTION FACTOR
   HC  CONCENTRATION PPM
   CO  CONCENTRATION PPM
   CO? CONCENTRATION PCT
   NOX CONCENTRATION PPM

   HC  MASS GRAMS
   CO  MASS GRAMS
   CO? MASS GRAMS
   NOX MASS GRAMS

   HC.  GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
   CO  GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
   CO? GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
   NOX GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
   FUEL CONSUMPTION BY CB L/lOOKMfMPG)
   CALCULATED DISTANCE KM (MILES)
COMPOSITE FTP RFSULTS
   HC  GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
   CO  GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
   CO? GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
   NOX GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
   FUEL CONSUMPTION BY CB L/IOOKM
                                                   VEHICLE EMISSION RESULTS
                                                          CFTP

                                                  TEST NO,       RUN 1
                                                  DATE lO/ 5/78
                                                  TIME  HI*?
                                                  DYNO NO.  ?
                                                  CVS Nn.   7
                                                  BAG CART NO.  i
                                                                                                       PROJECT NO. M-*7*b-001

                                                                                          TEST WEIGHT   lib* KG(  3000 IBS)
                                                                                          ACTUAL ROAD LOAD   8.» KW( 11.1 HP)
                                                                                          GASOLINE
                                                                                          ODOMETER    2b*8
                                                  RELATIVE HUMIDITY 7* PCT
                                                  ABSOLUTE HUMIDITY 1*.7 GM/KGU02.8 GRAINS/LB)
                                                                                                     NOX HUMIDITY C.F,  1.150
-------
                                           TABLE
VEHICLE NO.EM-10
VEHICLE MODEL   78 VOLVO
ENGINE 2.1 L(130 CIO) L-H
TRANSMISSION A3
GVW     0 KG(    -n LBS)
BAROMETER 7H1.17 MM H6(29.18 IN H6)
DRY BULB TEMP. 2H.H DEG C(7b.O DEG F)

BAG RESULTS
   BAG NUMBER
   DESCRIPTION
   BLOWER DIF f MM. HaO(IN. HgO)
   BLOWER INLET P MM. H20(IN. H20)
   BLOwER INLET TEMP. DEG. C(DEG. F)
   BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
   CVS FLOW STD. Cu. METRES(SCF)
    SAMPLE
    BCKGRD
    SAMPLE
    BCKGRO
COa SAMPLE
C02 BCKGRD
NOX SAMPLE
NOX BCKGRD
HC
HC
CO
CO
              METER/RANGE/PPM
              METER/RANGE/PPM
              METER/RANGE/PPM
              METER/RANGE/PPM
              METER/RANGE/PCT
              METER/RANGE/PCT
              METER/RANGE/PPM
              METER/RANGE/PPM
   DILUTION FACTOR
   HC  CONCENTRATION PPM
   CO  CONCENTRATION PPM
   CO? CONCENTRATION PCT
   NOX CONCENTRATION PPM

   HC  MASS GRAMS
   CO  MASS GRAMS
   C02 MASS GRAMS
   NOX MASS GRAMS

   HC  GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
   co  GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
   C02 GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
   NOX GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
   FUEL CONSUMPTION BY CB L/100KMCMPG)
   CALCULATED DISTANCE KM (MILES)

COMPOSITE FTP RESULTS
   HC  GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
   CO  GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
   COe GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
   NOX GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
   FUEL CONSUMPTION BY CB L/100KM (MPG)
                                                   VEHICLE EMISSION RESULTS
                                                          FTP

                                                  TEST NO.    7  RUN 1
                                                  DATE 10/10/78
                                                  TIME 13153
                                                  DYNO NO.  3
                                                  CVS NO.   3
                                                  BAG CART NO.  1
                                                                                                       PROJECT NO. ll-H7Hfa-001

                                                                                          TEST WEIGHT   13b* KG(  3000 LBS)
                                                                                          ACTUAL ROAD LOAD   B.H KW( 11.3 HP)
                                                                                          GASOLINE EM-271-F
                                                                                          ODOMETER
                                                  RELATIVE HUMIDITY H5 PCT
                                                  ABSOLUTE HUMIDITY  8.8 GM/KGC bl.b GRAINS/LB)
                                                                                                     NOX HUMIDITY C.F.   .9H09
                                                COLD TRANSIENT
                                                 73b.b (39.0)
                                                 73b.b (29.0)
                                                  H2.B (101.0)
                                                     HOb7S
                                                  7b.O (2bB2.7)
                                          .OH (
                                          .31 (
                                                   .38 (   .Hb)
                                                  b.55 ( 10.5H)
                                                 aB7.b ( iba.7)
                                                   .Hb (   .7*)
                                                 13.75 ( IB.fS)
                                                  5.82 (  3.b2)
                                                  .Ob)
                                                 a.
                                                                       STABILIZED
                                                                     73b.b (39.0)
                                                                     73b.b (39.0)
                                                                      *0.b (105.0)
                                                                         b9b!3
                                                                     130.5 (Hb08.7)
                                                                      -.0* (   -.07)
                                                                       .03 (    .OH)
                                                                     2b8.8 (  133.5)
                                                                       .17 (    .27)
                                                                     11.»7 (  B0.51)
                                                                      b.lb (   3.83)
HOT TRANSIENT
73b.b (21.0)
73b.b (39.0)
 HH.» (112.0)
    HObSO
 75.7 (ab73.1)
SO.H/ 2/
13. 9/ 2/
S2.1/11/
5.1/11/
bi.q/ 3/
H.2/ 3/
20. a/ s/
.b/ a/
10.22
38
H32
1.20
19.7
l.bb
38.17
lb7H.7
2.b9
so
1H
HbH
Ib
1.2b
.Ob
ao
i









7.»/ a/
11. b/ a/
9.0/13/
s. a/is/
HH.b/ 3/
H.9/ 3/
s.o/ a/
,b/ a/
17.50
-H
1
.b9
H.»
-.27
.Ib
Ib55.7
l.OH
7
12
9
B
.7b
.08
S
1









8.S/ 2/
B.8/ 2/
b.8/13/
5.1/13/
bl.l/ 3/ 1
H.9/ 3/
lb.9/ a/
.b/ 8/
12.3*
0
a
1.03
lb.3
.02
.Ib
1*07. b
2.23
9
9
7
5
.08
.08
17
1









  .00 (   .01)
  .03 (   .05)
2HH.3 ( 393.1)
  .39 (   .b2)
10.H3 ( 22.55)
 5.7b (  3.SB)
                                          .39 (   .H7)
                                        11. »5 ( ao.5f)

-------
                                           TABLE
  VEHICLE EMISSION RESULTS
         SET
VEHICLE NU.EM-IO
VEHICLE MODEL   73 VOLVO
ENGINE 2.1 L(130 CID) L-«»
TRANSMISSION
GVW     o KG(    -u LBS)

BAROMETER 7H1.17 MM HG(29.18 IN HG)
DRY BULB TEMP. ?S.o DEG CC77.0 DEG F)

BAG RESULTS
   BAG NUMBER
   BLOWER OIF P MM. H?0(IN. H?0)
   BLOWER INLET P MM. H20UN. H?0)
   BLOWER INLET TEMP. DEG. CCDEG. F)
   BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
   CVS FLOW 3TD. CU. METRES(SCF)
              METER/RANGE/PPM
              ME1ER/RANGE/PPM
              METER/RANGE/PPM
              METER/RANGE/PPM
              METER/RANGE/PCT
              METER/RANGE/PCT
              MEIER/RANGE/PPM
              METER/RANGE/PPM
   DILUTION FACTOR
   HC   CONCENTRATION PPM
   CO   CONCENTRATION PPM
   CO?  CONCENTRATION PCT
   NOX  CONCENTRATION PPM

   HC   MASS GRAMS
   CO   MASS GRAMS
   C02  MASS GRAMS
   NOX  MASS GRAMS

   HC   GRAMS/KM  (GRAMS/MILE)
   CO   GRAMS/KM  (GRAMS/MILE)
   CO?  GRAMS/KM  (GRAMS/MILE)
   NOX  GRAMS/KM  (GRAMS/MILE)
   FUEL CONSUMPTION  BY  CB  L/JOOKM(MPG)
   CALCULATED DISTANCE  KM  (MILES)





^
1
1 	 1
CTl
HC
HC
CO
CO
CO?
CO?
NOX
NOX
SAMPLE
BCKGRD
SAMPLE
BCKGRD
SAMPLE
BCKGRD
SAMPLE
BCKGRD
 TEST NO.    7
 DATE 10/10/78
 TIME 14150
 OYNO NO.  3
 CVS NO.   2
 BAG CART NO.
RUN 1
             PROJECT NO. ll-H7Hb-001

TEST WEIGHT   13b» KG(  3000 LBS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD   8. •» KW( 11.3 HP)
GASOLINE EM-27*-F
ODOMETER      -0
 RELATIVE HUMIDITY H? PCT
 ABSOLUTE HUMIDITY  B.b GM/KGC bO.O GRAIN3/LB)
73b.b (2^.0)
73b.b (29.0)
 *?.B (109.0)
   11P33S
20R.8 (7»OR.O)
                                    NOX HUMIDITY C.F.  .S3HO
9 ,H/ 2/
10. b/ 2/
•KB/13/
3.8/13/
72. b/ 3/ 1
5.0/ 3/
10. B/ 2/
l.f/ 2/
10. Ib
-0
1
1.25
9.5
-.02
.29
9
11
5
H
.32
.08
11
1







     3.57

 -.00 (  -.00)
  .01 (   .02)
218.H ( 351.5)
  .Ib (   .2b)
 9.32 ( 25.23)
21.95 ( 13.bf)

-------
VEHICLE NO.EM-10
VEHICLE MODEL   78 VOLVO
ENGINE 5.1 L(13U CIO) L-
TRANSMISSION
GVW     o KG(    -0 LBS)
BAROMETER 7H1.17 MM HG(2S.18 IN HG)
DRY BULB TEMP. 23.1 DEG C(75.n DEG F)

BAG RESULTS
   BAG NUMBER
   BLOWER DIF P MM. H20(IN. H20)
   BLOWER INLET P MM. H20(IN. H20)
   BLOWER INLET TEMP. DEG. C(DEG. F)
   BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
   CVS FLOW STD. CU. METRES(SCF)
              METER/RANGE/PPM
              METER/RANGE/PPM
              METER/RANGE/PPM
              METER/RANGE/PPM
              METER/RANGE/PCT
              METER/RANGE/PCT
              METER/RANGE/PPM
              METER/RANGE/PPM
   DILUTION FACTOR
   HC  CONCENTRATION PPM
   CO  CONCENTRATION PPM
   C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
   NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
   HC  MASS GRAMS
   CO  MASS GRAMS
   C02 MASS GRAMS
   NOX MASS GRAMS
   HC  GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
   CO  GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
   C02 GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
   NOX GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
   FUEL CONSUMPTION BY CB L/100KM(MPG)
   CALCULATED DISTANCE KM (MILES)
TABLE      VEHICLE EMISSION RESULTS
                  HFET

          TEST NO.    7  RUN 1
          DATE 10/10/78
          TIME
          DYNO NO.  3
          CVS NO.    2
          BAG CART NO.  1
1
-J
HC
HC
CO
CO
CO?
C02
NOX
NOX
SAMpLE
BCKGRD
SAMPLE
BCKGRD
SAMPLE
BCKGRD
SAMPLE
BCKGRD
             PROJECT NO. ll-1»7Hb-001

TEST WEIGHT   13bt K6(  3000 IBS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD   B.H KW( 11.3 HP)
GASOLINE  EM-27H-F
ODOMETER      -0
          RELATIVE HUMIDITY  "»8 PCT
          ABSOLUTE HUMIDITY   S.O  GM/KG(  b3.3  GRAINS/LB)
         73b.b (21.0)
         73b.b (21.0)
          H2.B UUq.O)
             blb89
         115.2 CtObB.S)

         11.S/ 2/    11
         10.ix a/    10
          5.1/13/     S
          t.7/13/     5
         S*.l/ 3X  1.7b
          H.b/ 3/   .07
         17.O/ 2/    17
          1.2/ 2/     1

              7.59
                3
                1
             1.70
             lb.0

               .18
               .11
            35S2.7
              3.33

           .01 (    .02)
           .01 (    .01)
         213.t {  3H3.H)
           .20 (    .32)
          9.11 C  25.82)
         lb.8* (  10.Hb)
           NOX HUMIDITY C.F.   .SH7S

-------
                                            TABLE
 I
t->
CD
VEHICLE NO.  ?Ht)
  .28  (    .45)
 9.77  ( 2H.08)
 5.7b  (   3.58)

-------
                                            TABLE
VEHICLE NO.  3b5
VEHICLE MODEL   78 VOLVO
ENGINE ?.l LM30 CIO) L-H
TRANSMISSION
GVW     II KG(    -0 LBS)
BAROMETER 7t5.2f MM HG(?9.3<*  IN HG)
DRY RULP TEMP. 25.0 DtG CC77.0 OEG F)
BAG RESULTS
   RAR NUMBER
   DESCRIPTION
   BLOWER OIF P MM. H20(IN. H20)
   RLOWER INLET P MM. H20UN. H?0)
   BLOWER INLET TFMP. DEC. C(OEG. F)
   BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
   CVS FLOH STO. CLI. METRES(SCF)
              METER/RANGE/PPM
              METER/RANGE/PPM
              METER/RANGE/PPM
              METER/RANGE/PPM
              METER/RANGE/PCT
              METER/RANGE/PCT
              METER/RANGE/PPM
              METER/RANGE/PPM
   DILUTION FACTOR
   HC  CONCENTRATION PPM
   CD  CONCENTRATION PPM
   CO? CONCENTRATION PCT
   NO* CONCENTRATION PPM

   HC  MASS GRAMS
   CO  MASS GRAMS
   CO? MASS GRAMS
   NOX MASS GRAMS

   HC  GRAMS/KM  (GRAMS/MILE)
   CO  GRAMS/KM  (GRAMS/MILE)
   CO? GRAMS/KM  (GRAMS/MILE)
   NOX GRAMS/KM  (GRAMS/MILE)
   FUEL CONSUMPTION BY CB  L/IUOKM(MPG)
   CALCULATED DISTANCE KM  (MILES)
COMPOSITE FTP RESULTS
   HC  GRAMS/KM  (GRAMS/MILE)
   CO  GRAMS/KM  (GRAMS/MILE)
   CO? GRAMS/KM  (GRAMS/MILE)
   NOX GRAMS/KM  (GRAMS/MILE)
   FUEL CONSUMPTION BY CB L/100KM




nd
i
i_i
vD

HC
HC
CO
CO
CO?
CO?
NOX
NUX
SAMpl.E
BCKRRD
SAMPLE
BCKGRD
SAMPLE
BCKGRD
SAMPLE
BCKGRD
            VEHICLE EMISSION RESULTS
                   CFTP

           TEST NO.       RUN
           DATE  l/lb/79
           TIME
           DYNO NO.  ?
           CVS NO.   R
           BAG CART NO.  1
                                   PROJECT NO. ll-H7tb-001

                      TEST WEIGHT   1591 KG(  3500 LBS)
                      ACTUAL ROAD LOAD   9.2 KW( 18.3 HP)
                      GASOLINE
                      ODOMETER    395b
           RELATIVE HUMIDITY -»2 PCT
           ABSOLUTE HUMIDITY  8.5 GM/KGC 59.5 GRAINS/LB)
                                 NOX HUMIDITY C.F.  .9321
         COLD TRANSIENT
         1219.3 (>»B.O)
          792.5 (31.2)
           H3.3 (110.0)
            .tfl (   .77)
           7.b5 ( 15.31)
          289.3 ( HbS.5)
            .18 (   .29)
          12.93 ( 18.20)
           5.8t
   .18 (   .3D)
  2.H8 (  3.99)
282.09 (H53.89)
   .09 (   ,1H)
 12.23 ( 19.23)
                   3.b3)
   STABILIZED
1519.2 (H8.0)
 792.5 (31.2)
  H3.3 (110.0)
   .10 (    .lb)
   .9fa (   1.55)
 28b.b (  fbl.2)
   ,0<* (    .07)
 12.31 (  19.11)
  b.29 (   3.91)
 HOT TRANSIENT
1219.2 (H8.0)
 792.5 (31.2)
  H3.3 (110.0)

8b
b5.
9.
92.
2.
b3.
*.
8.
*•









12Hb7
.0 (3035
S/ 2/
7/ 2/

.9)
b5
10
7/11/ fb9
1/U/
*/ 3/ 1.
I/ 3/ .
2/ 2/
H/ 2/
11.33
57
**7
1.07
b.9
2.81
f».b9
Ib89.7
I.Ob
b
13
Ob
8
1










IHb
IB.
11.
*2.
*.
13.
*.
2.
2.









2130*
.8 (5185
O/ 2/
•*/ 2/
7/13/
H/13/
I/ 3/ .
S/ 3/ .
9/ 2/
O/ 2/
18.07
7
35
.b?
1.0
.bl
b.Ot
1802.2
.2b

.1)
18
11
to
H
7t
07
3
2










Bb
25.
12.
91.
5.
59.
3.
b.
2.









12*91
.1 (30*2
B/ 2/
5/ 2/
3/13/
*/13/
I/ 3/ 1.
8/ 3/ .
I/ 2/
3/ 2/
12. b8
1*
e*
.99
t.o
.71
S.fb
15b3.8
.bl

.2)
2b
13
92
5
05
Ob
b
2









   .12 (    .20)
  1.H5 (   2.33)
 2b9.1 (  H31.3)
   .10 (    .1?)
 11.55 (  20.3b)
  5.83 (   3.b3)

-------
                                                  TARLE
 I
NJ
O
       VFHTCIF  NO.   2H*
       VFHICIE  MODEL   ?n vnLvn
       t NT. INF  ?.l  L(13n  CID) L-H
       TRANSMISSION A3
       GVW      n KGC    -0 LBS)
       BAROMFTER 731.31 MM Hr,(?i.n  IN HG>
       DRY  BULB  TEMP.  ?3.1 OEG C(75.n DEC F)

       BAG  RFS'JLTS
          RAT, NUMBER
          nESCRIPTION
          RLOWF.R OIF F  MM. H?.0(IN. H?0)
          RLOHFR INLET  P MM.  HPOCIN. H2o)
          RLnwER INLET  TEMP.  OEG. C(OEG. F)
          RLOWER REVOLUTIONS
          TVS FLOW 3TD. CD.  METRES(SCF)
          HC
          MC
          CO
          CO
    SAMPLE
    RCKGRD
    SAMPLE
    BCKGRO
CO? SAMPLE
CO? BCKGRO
NOX SAMPLE
NOX BCKGRD
METER/RANGF./PPM
METFR/RANGF/PPM
METFR/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
MF.TER/RANGE/PCT
METER/PANGF/PCT
METER/RANGE/PPM
MFTER/RANGF./PPM
          DILUTION  FACTOP
          HC   CONCENTRATION PPM
          CO   CONCENTRATION PPM
          CO?  CONCENTRATION PCT
          NOX  CONCENTRATION PPM

          HC   MASS  GRAMS
          CO   MASS  GRAMS
          CO?  MASS  GRAMS
          NOX  MASS  GRAMS

          Hf   GRAMS/KM  (GRAMS/MILE)
          CO   GRAMS/KM  (GRAMS/MILE)
          CO?  GRAMS/KM  (GRAMS/MILE)
          NflX  GRAMS/KM  (GRAMS/MILE)
          FUEL CONSUMPTION  BY  CB  L/100KM(MPG)
          CALCULATED DISTANCE  KM  (MRES)

      COMPOSITE FTP RESULTS
          HC   GRAMS/KM  (GRAMS/MILE)
          TO   GRAMS/KM  (GRAMS/MILE)
          CO?  GRAMS/KM  (GRAMS/MILE)
          NO*  GRAMS/KM  (GRAMS/MILE)
          FUFL CONSUMPTION  BY  Cfl  L/100KM  (MPG)
                                                   VEHICLE EMISSION RESULTS
                                                          FTP

                                                   TEST  NO.        RUN
                                                   DATE   f/ 5/71
                                                   TIME  1SI43
                                                   DYNO  NO.  3
                                                   CVS NO.   ?
                                                   BAG CART NO.   1
                                                                                             PROJECT NO.  ll-»7»h-OMl

                                                                                TEST  HEIGHT    1SS1  KG(  3500 LBS)
                                                                                ACTUAL  ROAD  LOAD   9.? KW( 12.^ HP)
                                                                                GASOLINE  EM-27»-3
                                                                                ODOMETER     H?.lb
                                                  RELATIVE  HUMIDITY  H8  PCT
                                                  ABSOLUTE  HUMIDITY   9.1  GM/KG(  b3.5  GRAIN3/LB)
                                                                                           NOX HUMIDITY C.F
                                                         1
                                                COLO  TRANSIENT
                                                  7b?.0  (30.0)
                                                  73b.b  (2S.O)
                                                   H3.1  (111.0)
                                                   75.8  (2b7b.b)
                                                    .37 (    .51)
                                                  7.10 (  II. f3)
                                                 ?B8.7 (  Hbf.S)
                                                 12.85 ( 18.31)
                                                  5.11 (  3.b8)
                                          .10 (   .lb)
                                         l.bl (  ?.72)
                                       271.53 CMb.81)
                                          .15 (   .25)
                                        11.7? ( ?0.n8)
                                                             STABILIZED
                                                           7b2.n  On.O)
                                                           73b.b  (21.0)
                                                            H2.2  (108.0)
                                                               b17bO
                                                           121.9  (H588.8)
51. 0/ 2/
10. 3/ 2/
9b.0/ll/
1.5/11/
70. 3/ 3/
2. 1/ 3/
12. 1/ 2/
1.8/ S/
10.12
50
f 7b
1.23
11.3
2.17
•f 1.97
1707.5
1.55
51
in
500
5
1.27
.Of
13
2









9. I/ 2/
B.I/ 2/
5.1/13/
2.B/13/
*5.7/ 3/
3.S/ 3/
*.3/ 2/
I.I/ 2/
17. Ot
2
2
.73
2.5
.11
.3*
17t7.2
.59
10
1
5
3
.78
.05
H
2









  .02 (
  .05 (
278.5 (
  .01 (
                                                                     .03)
                                                                     .09)
                                                                      .l)
                                                                     .15)
                                                          11.81  (  19.78)
                                                           b.27  (   3.90)
                    HOT TRANSIENT
                    7b2.0 (30.0)
                    73b.b (29.0)
                     »3.3 (110.0)
                        H0133
                     7b.l (2b88.7)

                    !•».!/ 2/    1H
                     B.3/ 2/    8
                    5n.f/13/    HB
                     2.8/13/    3
                    bl.O/ 3/ l.OB
                     3. I/ 3/   .Ob
                     I.1*/ 2/    9
                     l.S/ 2/    2

                        12.31
                           b
                          "»»
                        1.09
                         7.7
     3.88
   1*32.9
     I.Ob

  .05 (   .08)
  .b? (  1.0?)
      ( 39*. 8)
  .18 (   .21)
10.53 ( 22.35)
                     5.8H
                                                                                                   3.b3)

-------
                                           TABLE
                                                           VEHICLE EMISSION RESULTS
                                                                  FTPC
10
VEHICLE NO.
VEHICLE MODEL   78 VOLVO
ENGINE 2.1 LCIBO CID) L-H
TRANSMISSION
GVW     u KG(    -o LBS)
BAROMETER 7HS.7H MM HG(29.3b IN HG)
DRY BUL* TEMP. 23.9 DEG C(75.0 DEC F)

BAG RESULTS
   PAG NUMBER
   DESCRIPTION
   BLOWER OIF P MM. H20(IN. HgO)
   PLOWER INLET P MM. H?0(IN. H20)
   BLOWER INLET TEMP. DEG. CCDEG. F)
   BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
   CVS FLOW STD. CU. METRES(SCF)
        HC
        HC
        CO
        CO
    SAMpLE
    BCKGRD
    SAMPLE
    BCKGRD
CO? SAMPLE
C02 BCKGRD
NOX SAMPLE
NOX BCKGRD
              METER/RANGE/PpM
              METFR/RANGE/PPM
              METER/RANGE/PPM
              METER/RANGE/PPM
              METER/RANGE/PCT
              METER/RANGE/PCT
              METER/RANGE/PPM
              METER/RANGE/PPM
   DILUTION FACTOR
   HC  CONCENTRATION PPM
   CO  CONCENTRATION PPM
   CO? CONCENTRATION PCT
   NOX CONCENTRATION PPM

   HC  MASS GRAMS
   co  MASS GRAMS
   CO? MASS GRAMS
   NOX MASS GRAMS

   HC  GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
   co  GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
   CO? GRAMS/KM CGRAMS/MILE)
   NOX GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
   FUEL CONSUMPTION BY CB L/100KM(MPG)
   CALCULATED DISTANCE KM (MILES)

COMPOSITE FTP RESULTS
   HC  GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
   CO  GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
   CO? GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MlLE)
   NOX GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
   FUEL CONSUMPTION BY CB L/100KM (MPG)
                                                          TEST NO.
                                                          DATE  2/ 7/71
                                                          TIME 10:35
                                                          DYNO NO.  3
                                                          CVS NO.   ?
                                                          BAG CART NO.
                                                                         RUN
                                                                                                       PROJECT NO.  ll-^Hb-OUl

                                                                                          TEST WEIGHT   1591 KG(  3500  LBS)
                                                                                          ACTUAL ROAD LOAD   9.2 KW(  12.3  HP)
                                                                                          GASOLINE
                                                                                          ODOMETER    H155
                                                          RELATIVE HUMIDITY 3H PCT
                                                          ABSOLUTE HUMIDITY  b.t GM/KGC HH.9 GRAINS/LB)
                                                                                                     NOX HUMIDITY C.F.   .87bO
                                                        COLD TRANSIENT
                                                         7ba.O (30.0)
                                                         73b.b (29.0)
                                                          f2.2 (108.0)
                                                             H07?3
                                                          7b.b (270H.8)
59. 3/ 2/
7.b/ 2/
81.8/11/
.7/1 I/
b7.8/ 3/ ]
3.0/ 3/
11. 3/ 2/
.H/ 2/
10. b?
52
1.18
10.9
2.32
32. H9
lbS2.0
I.HO
59
8
379
2
1.22
.05
11
0








                                                           .HO (   .bH)
                                                          .5.58 (  8.98)
                                                         283.8 ( HSfa.b)
                                                           .2H (   .39)
                                                         12.5H ( 18.7b)
                                                          5.82 (  3.b2)
                                                  .11 (   .IB)
                                                 1.3b (  2.19)
                                                  .39 (ftl.33)
                                                  .13 (   .20)
                                                11.81 ( J9.91)
                                                                       STABILIZED
                                                                     7fa2.0 (30.0)
                                                                     7H9.3 (29.5)
                                                                      HO.b (105.0)
                                                                         b9715
                                                                     131.3 (
-------
                                                 TABLE
to
NJ
VEHICLE NO.  ?tn
VEHICLE MODFL   ?e VOLVO  2tH
tNCUNE f.l L(130 C1D) L-H
TRANSMISSION A}
Gvw     n KG(    -u LB3)


BARdMFTER 7H5.7* MM HG(?9.3b IN HG)
DRY HULB TFMP. ?7.? DEP, C(B1.0 DEG F)

BAG RESULTS
   BAT, NUMBER
   DESCRIPTION
   HLOWfR DIF F MM. H?0(IN. H?0)
   RLOhF.R INLET P MM. H20UN. H20)
   8LOWER INLET TEMP. DEG. C(DEG. F)
   RLOWER REVOLUTIONS
   CV3 FLOW STD. CU. METRES(SCF)
             SAMPLE
   HC
   HC
   CO  SAMPLE
   CO  BCKGRD
   CO? SAMPLE
   CO? BCKGRD
   NOX SAMPLE
   NOX BCKGRD
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/FPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PCT
METER/RANGE/PCT
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
         DILUTION FACTOR
         HC  CONCENTRATION PPM
         CO  CONCENTRATION PPM
         CO? CONCENTRATION PCT
         NOX CONCENTRATION PPM

         HC  MASS GRAM3
         CO  MASS GRAMS
         CO? MASS GRAMS
         NOX MASS GRAMS

         HC  GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
         co  GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
         CO? GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
         NOX GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
         FUEL CONSUMPTION BY  CB L/inOKM(MPG)
         CALCULATED  DISTANCE  KM (MILES)

      COMPOSITE  FTP  RESULTS
         HC   GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
         CO   GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
         Co?  GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
         NOX  GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
         FUEL CONSUMPTION BY  CB L/100KM (MPG)
                                        VEHICLE EMISSION RESULTS
                                               FTP

                                       TEST NO.       RUN
                                       DATE  2/12/79
                                       TIME 13SHS
                                       DYNO NO.  3
                                       CVS NO.   ?
                                       BAG CART NO.  1
                                                                                                                PROJECT  NO.  ll-»7Hb-001

                                                                                                   TEST HEIGHT   1591 KG(   3500  LB3)
                                                                                                   ACTUAL ROAD L0*0   9.2  KH(  12.3  HP)
                                                                                                   GASOLINE EM-27H-F
                                                                                                   ODOMETER    H19b
                                                           RELATIVE HUMIDITY 3* PCT
                                                           ABSOLUTE HUMIDITY  8.9 GM/KG( b2.3 GRAINS/LB)
                                                                                          NOX HUMIDITY  C.F.   .9H3S
                                                         COLD TRANSIENT
                                                          7b2.0 (30.0)
                                                          73b.b
 7b.8 (2710.8)

5».7/ 2/   55
 9.i»/ 2/    9
7H.9/11X  330
  .8/11/    2
bb.7/ 3/ 1.20
 3.0/ 3/  .05
11.0/ 2/   11
 1.9/ 2/    2

    10.85

     31b
    l.lb
     9.3

28
•
Ib2»

*
».
27»
»
12.
5.
1
35
79
.8
22
10
91
•
(
(
(
(
(
(
28
.2
28

7
»f

19
3



,5b)
.70)
2.2)
.35)
."*5)
,b7)
                               .10 (   ,lb)
                              1.23 (  1.98)
                            257.35 (H1H.08)
                               .12 (   .19)
                             11.08 ( 21.23)
  STABILIZED
7b2.0 (30.0)
73b.b (29.0)
 «»3.3 (110.0)
    b9772
130.9 (HbSH.l)

12.0/ 2/   12
 9.b/ 2/   10
 3.0/13/    3
t3.0/ 3/  .73
 3.5/ 3/  .05
 ».2/ 2/    •»
 2.3/ 2/    2

    18.22
       3
       1
     ,b8
     2.0

      .22
      .18
   Ib37.9
                                                            .0» (   .Ob)
                                                            .03 (   .05)
                                                          259.9 ( «H8.2)
                                                            .08 (   .12)
                                                          11.10 ( 21.20)
                                                           b.30 (  3.92)
HOT TRANSIENT
7b2.0 (30.0)
73b.b (29.0)
 *3.3 (110.0)
    412b7
 77.5 (2737.5)

15. 5/ 2/   15
10. H/ 2/   10
57.7/13/   55
 1.9/13/    2
57. 9/ 3/ 1.02
 2.B/ 3/  .Ot
 7.b/ 2/    8
 2.3/ 2/    2

    13.03
       b
      52
     .«»8
     5.5

      .2b
      .77

  .05 (   .07)
  .80 (  1.29)
239.3 ( 385.0)
  .13 (   .21)
10.27 ( 22.90)
 5.82 (  3.b2)

-------
                                           TABLE
VEHICLE wo.
VEHICLE "OnEL   ?B VOLVO PH4-DL
ENGINE ?.J Ltl3n CID) L-H
TRANSMISSION 43
GVw     0 K(l(    -n LPS)
          711.in MM HG(?1.13 IN MR)
DRY RULB TfMp. ?3.i» nEG C(75.0 DEG F)

RAG RESULTS
   BAT, NUMBER
   DESCRIPTION
   BLOWER DIP P MM. HPOCIN. H?O)
   BLOWER INLET P MM. H?0(IN. H20)
   BLOWER INLET TEMP. OFG. C(OEG. F)
   BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
   CVS FLO'M STO. CM. METRES(SCF)
   HC
   HC
   CO
   CO
       METFRXRANGEXPPM
       MFTFRXRANGEXPPM
SAMPLE
              MFTFPXRANGEXPCT
   co? BCKGRO METERXRANGEXPCT
   NOX SAMPLE MFTFRXRANGEXPPM
              MFTFRXRANGEXPPM
   DILUTION FACTOR
   HC  CONCENTRATION PPM
   Co  CONCENTRATION PPM
   Co? CONCENTRATION PCT
   NOX CONCENTRATION PPM

   HC  MASS GRAMS
   CO  MASS G«AMS
   CO? MASS GRAMS
   NOX MASS GRAMS

   HC  GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
   CO  GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
   CO? GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
   NOX GRAwg/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
   FUEL CONSUMPTION BY C" L / innKM f MPR)
   CALCULATED DISTANCE KM (MRES)
COMPOSITE FTP RESULTS
   HC  GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
   CO  GRAMS/KM (GRAMSXMIl.E)
   CO? GRAMS/KM (f,RAM«l/MILE)
   NOX GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
   FUEL CONSUMPTION BY CB L/innKM
 VEHICLE EMISSION RESULTS
        FTP SET

TEST NO.       RUN
DATE  3X 1X71
TIME 14|S2
OYNO NO.  1
CVS NO.   2
BAG CART NO.  1

RELATIVE HUMIDITY 3s PCT
ABSOLUTE HUMIDITY  7,1 GMXKG(
                                                                                                   PROJECT NO.  U-H7fb-001

                                                                                      TEST WEIGHT   1511 KGC   3500 LBS)
                                                                                      ACTUAL ROAD LOAD   1,2 KW(  ie,3  HP)
                                                                                      GASOLINE
                                                                                      ODOMETER    HbSl
                                                                                 GRAINS/LB)
                        NOX HUMIDITY C.F.
COLD
741
723
43

75
in.
| 1
88,
1.
7h.
3.
1?.
1.








TRANSIENT
.3 (21
.1 (28
.3 (11
40b78
.8 (2b
8X 3X
3X 3X
4X11X
bXUX
4X 3X
bX 3X
IX 2X
4X ?X
1.2b
Ib
410
1.35
10,1
4.22
3b.23
18b8.1
.5)
.5)
n,o)

77,7)
ins
13
432
S
1,40
.Ob
12
1








STABILIZED
741
723
43

121
13.
11.
21.
3,
«»'.
H,
5.
1.








.3 (21.
.1 (28.
,3 (110
b1b28
5)
5)
.0)

.P (4582.1)
4X 2X
bX 2X
3X13X
2X13X
8X 3X
OX 3X
2X 2X
5X 2X
Ib.lB
3
17
.77
3.8
.19
2.54
1823,2
13
12
20
3
.8?
.Ob
5
2








HOT
741
723
43

7b
22.
12.
78,
e.
b3.
3.
b.
1.








TRANSIENT
.3 (21.
.1 (28.
.3 (110
4071b
.0 (2b8
8X 2X
SX 2X
7X13X
5X13X
IX 3X 1
BX 3X
3X 2X
8X 2X
11.81
11
73
1.07
*.7
,50
b,47
1411.8
5)
5)
.0)

5.3)
23
13
78
2
.12
,0b
b
2








741
723
43

201
25.
21.
87,
1.
?•*,
H.
5,
1.








SET-7
.3 (21,
.1 (?B.
,3 (110
112380

5)
5)
.0)

.4 (731b,4)
bX 2X
IX 2X
2X13X
7X13X
OX 3X 1
OX 3X
BX 2X
IX 2X
1.B8
b
83
1.21
*,8
.71
20,17
4150,1
2b
22
B8
2
.35
.Ob
b
1








                                               ,73 (  1.17)
                                              b,2R ( in, 10)
                                             3J3.7 ( 5?0,1)
                                              5.77 (  3.51)
                                      .11 (   .31)
                                     1 . R 1 (  S . 11)
                                   ?88.8t (HbH.75)
                                      .15 C   .?•»)
                                    I?.t8 ( IB.Bb)
                                                                       .84
                     ,03 (
                   211.0 (
                     .13 (
                   12. t5 (  18,81)
                    b.27 (   3.81)
  .05)
  ,b5)
"»bB,2)
  .22)
      .bl


  .01 (    .14)
 1.12 (   1.80)
258,4 (  415,8)
  .10 (    ,17)
11.12 (  21,Ib)
 5.77 (   3.51)
     1.72


  .03 (   .05)
  .13 (  1.41)
228.0 ( 3bb,1)
  .08 (   ,13)
 1.80 ( 24.01)
21.71 ( 13,41)
COMBINED FUEL ECONOMY LXJflOkM
                                           11.27 ( 2(1.R7)

-------
                                                  TABLE
KJ
                7R VPLvn
                 ciD) L-*

                 -n
       VEHICLE  NO,   p*
       VEHICLE  "OnFL
       ENGINE  ?,i Lru
       TRANSMISSION  43
       r.vw      (i  KM
       BAROMFTER  7»H.fH MM  HG(?9.H5  IN HR)
       DRY  BULB TFMP.  ,,s>t,  nFr, C(7B.O OF.r, F)
BAG RESULTS
   BAT,
   DESCRIPTION
   BLOWER OIF P
   BLOWER INLET
                           HPOCIN, H?O)
                             HPOHN.  H?OI
                           .        .
          BLOWER  INLET  TFMP.  DFP.  CCDEG.  n
          BLOWER  REVOLUTIONS
          cvs  FLOW  STD. cu. METRFSCSCF)
   HC  SAMPLF MFTER/RANGE/PPM
   HC  BCKGRD MFTER/RANGE/PPM
   CO  SAMPLE MfTFR/RANGE/PPM
   co  BCKGRD MFTER/RANGE/PPM
   co? SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
   co? BCKGRD MFTER/RANGE/PCT
   NOX SAMPLF MFTER/RANGE/PPM
   NOX BCKGRD MFTER/RANGE/PPM

   DILUTION FACTOR
   HC  CONCENTRATION PPM
   CO  CONCENTRATION PPM
   CO? CONCENTRATION PCT
   NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
         HC  MASS GRAMS
         CO  MASS RRAMS
         CO? MASS GRAMS
         NOX MASS GRAMS
         HC  GHAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
         co  GRAMS/KM (GR*MS/MILE)
         CO? GR«MS/KM (GR4MS/MILE)
         NOX GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
         EUEL CONSUMPTION BY CB
         CALCULATED DISTANCE KM

      COMPOSITE FTP RESULTS
         HC  GRAMS/KM (PRAMS/MILE)
         co  GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
         CO? GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
         NOX GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
         EUEL CONSUMPTION RY CB
                                                      VEHICLE EMISSION RESULTS
                                                             FTP
  TEST NO.
  DATE  3/  5/7<»
  TIME J3I30
  DYNO NO.   3
  CVS NO.   ?
  BAG CART  NO.  1
                                                                    RUN
                                  PROJECT NO. ll-»7»ti-nni

                     TEST WEIGHT    15^1 KG(  3SOO UBS)
                     ACTUAL ROAD  LOAD   9.? KW( 1?,3 HP)
                     GASOLINE
                     ODOMETER
                                                     RELATIVE HUMIDITY ?? PCT
                                                     ABSOLUTE HUMIDITY  t.5 GM/KG(  31.H  GRAINSXLfl)
                                                     NOX HUMIDITY C.F.
COLD TRANSIENT
 7H1.3 (?9.5)
                                                         1.37
                                             .1*  f    .23)
                                            1.55  (   ?,50)
                                          ?b3.?5
                                             .15
                                           11.31,
  STABILIZED
7*9.3 (?9.5)
7?3,9 (?B,5)
                           .8*
.•»9 ( .79)
5.51 ( 8.87)
27*. 1 ( IHl.n)
.23 ( ,38)
12.13 ( 19.39)
5,88 ( 3,bb)
.03 ( .OH)
.23 ( .38)
2b8,b ( t32.1)
.I* ( .22)
11. »8 ( 20. H9)
b.21 ( 3.8b)
HOT TRANSIENT
7*9.3 (?9.5)
7?3.9 (?8.5)
"b.l (115
HObbl
.n)

7b.7 (2710.8)
75. 3/ ?/
1 l.O/ ?/
81.5/11/
l.l/ll/
bb.5/ 3/ 1
3.3/ 3/
1?,0/ 2/
.8/ 2/
10.83
b5
3b3
1.15
11.3
2.89
32. »?
lbl?.b
75
11
377
3
.n
.05
12
1








•»2.2 (108. n)
b9h9H
131.7 (Hb52.1)
12. 5/ ?/ 13
10. 9/ 2/ 11
13.8/13/ 13
3.8/13/ *
43. 5/ 3/ ,7>4
3,b/ 3/ ,0b
»,7/ 2/ 5
.7/ 2/ 1
17.97
2
9
.b9
f.O
.17
l.*5
Ibb7,l
*3.3 (110
>»0550
7b.5 (270
22, 2/ 2/
9.5/ 2/
72.2/13/
2.5/13/
bO.9/ 3/ 1
3.b/ 3/
5.8/ 2/
,7/ 2/
12.29
13
b7
1.03
5.2
.59
5.92
1HH2.9
.0)

1.*
2?
10
71
2
,08
,0b
k
1








                                                                                            « .10 (   ,lb)
                                                                                             1.01 (  l.b?)
                                                                                            245.2 ( 39H.b)
                                                                                              .11 (   .17)
                                                                                            10.55 ( 22.30)
                                                                                             5.88 (  3.bb)

-------
                                                  TABLE
Ul
      VEHICLE NO.   ?<*.»
      VEHICLE MODEL   ?B VOLVO
      ENGINE 2.1 L(]3n CID)  L-*
      TRANSMISSION  A3
      GVW     0 KG(    -n LBS1
       BAROMETER  7*5.*9 MM  HGf?9.35  IN  HG)
       DRY  BULB TEMp.  ;»i'.7  DEC  C{71.0 DEC F)
       BAG  RESULTS
         SAG NUMBER
         DESCRIPTION
         BLOWER  DIP P MM.  H?0(IN, H?0)
         BLOWER  INLET P MM.  H?0(IN. H?o)
         BLOWER  INLET TEMP.  DEC". CCOEG. F)
         BLOWER  REVOLUTIONS
         CVS FLOW  STO. CU. METRES(SCF)
         HC
         HC
         CO
         CO
    SAMPLE
    BCKGRD
    SAMPLE
    BCKGRD
CO? SAMPLE
co? BCKGRD
NOX SAMPLE
NOX BCKGRO
MFTER/RANGE/PPM
MPTERXRANGEXPPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
MFTER/RANGE/PCT
METERXRANGEXPCT
METE&XRANGEXPPM
METERXRANGEXPPM
         DILUTION  FACTOR
         HC   CONCENTRATION  PPM
         CO   CONCENTRATION  PPM
         CO?  CONCENTRATION  PCT
         NOX  CONCENTRATION  PPM

         HC   MASS  GRAMS
         CO   MASS  GRAMS
         CO?  MASS  GRAMS
         NOX  MASS  GRAMS

         HC   GRAMS/KM  (GRAMS/MILE)
         CO   GRAMS/KM  (GRAMS/MRE)
         CO?  GRAMS/KM  (GRAMS/MILE)
         NOX  GRAMS/KM  (GRAMS/MILE)
         FUEL CONSUMPTION BY  CB  L/lOOKMfMPG)
         CALCULATED  DISTANCE  KM  (MILES)

      COMPOSITE  FTP  RESULTS
         HC   GRAMg/KM  (GRAMS/MILE)
         CO   GRAMS/KM  (GRAM3XMILE)
         CO?  GRAMS/KM  (GRAMS/MILE)
         NOX  GRAMS/KM  (GRAMS/MRE)
         FUEL CONSUMPTION BY  CB  L/100KM  (MPG)
                                                   VEHICLE EMISSION RESULTS
                                                          FTP

                                                  TEST NO.       RUN
                                                  DATE  3/ bX79
                                                  TIME HI20
                                                  DYNO NO.  3
                                                  CVS NO.   2
                                                  BAG CART NO.  1
                                                                                            PROJECT NO. U»*7»b-001

                                                                               TEST WEIGHT   1591 KG(  3500 LBS)
                                                                               ACTUAL ROAD LOAD   9.2 KW( 12,3 HP)
                                                                               GASOLINE
                                                                               ODOMETER      "0
                                                  RELATIVE HUMIDITY 34 PCT
                                                  ABSOLUTE HUMIDITY  5.b GM/KG( 39.1 GRAINS/IB)
                                                                                          NOX HUMIDITY C.F,  ,8555
        1
COLD TRANSIENT
 7b2.0 (30.0)
 73b.b (29.0)
  »3.3 (110.0)
     HOblS
  7b.2 (2b90.B)

 b3.3/ 2X   b3
 11. 5/ 2/   H
 79.1/11/  3bO
  1.2X11X    »
 b7.»X 3/ 1.21
  3,bX 3/  .Ob
 !?.!/ ?/   12
   ,8X 2/    1

     10.70
       53
      3H4
     l.lb
                                                      2.32
                                                     30.51
                                                    U20.V
                                                .bt)
                                               8.38)
                                                   .HO (
                                                  5.21 (
                                                 27b.H (
                                                 12.20 (  19.28)
                                                  5.8b (   3,bf)
                                          .11 (   .18)
                                         1.31 (  2.10)
                                       272.11 (»37.83)
                                          .15 (   ,2*)
                                        11.72 ( 20.08)
                                                                       STABILIZED
                                                                     7b2.0 (30.0)
                                                                     73b.b (29.0)
                                                                      H3.3 (110.0)
                                                                         b9bfl
                                                                     130.b (Hbl3.5)
12. 5X 2X
11. 3X 2X
11.3X13X
3.3X13X
»b,2X 3X
3.9X 3X
*,9X 2X
,7X 2X
lb.B8
8
13
11
11
3
.79
.Ob
5
1


                          ».8

                           .1*
                          l.lb
                        17bS.S
  .02 (    .04)
  ,19 (    .30)
28*.2 (  *57.3)
  .15 (    .23)
12.15 (  19.37)
 b,21 (   3.8b)
HOT TRANSIENT
7b2.0 (30.0)
73b.b (29.0)
 *3.3 (110.0)
    tOSbl
 7b.l (2b87.1)

18. SX 2X   IB
10. 5X 8X   10
35.0X13X   33
 2.7X13X    ]
bl.»X 3X 1,09
 3.7X 3X  ,0b
 5. OX 2X    5
  ,5X 2X    1

    12.23
       9
      30
    1.0*
                                                                                    .39
                                                                                   2,b3
                                                                                 l»f 7,2
                                                                                    .57
  .07 (
  ,HS (
                                                   ,11)
                                                   ,72)
                                                                                .10  (    .15)
                                                                              10.55  (  22,29)
                                                                               5.87  (   3,bS)

-------
                                            TABLE
             VFHICLE  EMISSION RESULTS
                   FTP
 VFH JC.I E  MM.   ?MH
 VFHICIF  MfinrL    ?B VOLVH
 ErninF  ?. i  i (13P cio) L-»
 IP MI' ,»• I SS ION A?
 GVW      I  KG(     -fi LHS)
BAROMf-TFR 7"7.7H MM HG(21.11  IN HG)
DRY hulR U^P. ?3.1 DFG C(7S.O DEC F)

BAT. PFSIILTS
   PAG NIIMUFR
   DESCRIPTION
   BIHWFR OIF P MM. H?0(IN. HpO)
   HLOWFR TNLET P MM. H2CKIN. H?0)
   RLOwFR INLET TEMP. DEG. C(OEG. F)
   Rl.OWFR REVOLUTIONS
   fV? FLOW STD. CU. METPES(SCF)




Krj
K)
cn
HC
HC
ro
CO
CO?
ro?
NOX
NOX
SAMPLE
R C K G F) 0
SAMPl F
BCKGFyD
SAMPLF
BCKGRD
SAMPLE
RCKGRD
                          /PPM
               MF TFp/RANGE/PPM
               MtTFR/RANGF/PPM
               METFR/RANGE/PPM
               MFTFR/RANGE/PCT
               MFTER/RANGE/PCT
               ME1F.R/RANGE /PPM
               METER/RANGE./PPM
   DILUTION  FACTOR
   HC   CONCENTRATION PPM
   CO   CONCENTRATION PPM
   Cd2  CONCENTRATION PCT
   NOx  CONCENTRATION PPM

   HC   MASS  GRAMS
   CO   MASS  GRAMS
   CO?  MASS  GRAMS
   NOX  MASS  GRAMS

   NT   GRAMS/KM  (GRAMS/MILE)
   Co   GRAMS/KM  (GRAMS/MILE)
   CO?  GRAMS/KM  (RRAMS/M1LF)
   NOX  GRAMS/KM  (GRAMS/MILE)
   FUFL CONSUMPTION  f?Y CR  L/lnOKM(MPG)
   CALCULATED DISTANCE KM  (MILES)

COMPOSITE FTP RESULTS
   HC  GRAMS/KM  (GRAMS/MJLF)
   CO  GR*Mf,/KM  (GRAMS/MILF)
   CClP GRAMS/KM  (GRAMS/MILE)
   NOX GRAMS/KM  (GRAMS/MILF)
   FUFL CONSUMPTION  BY CH  L/IOOKM  (MPG)
            TFST  NO.
            DATE   3/12/71
            TIME  ni:l7
            DVNO  NO.   3
            CyS NO.    2
            BAG CART  NO.
                           RUN
                                                                                                           PROJECT  NO.  1 1-t 7Hb-Ofll
                                                                                              TEST WEIGHf   1511 KG(   1SOO  LPS)
                                                                                              ACTUAL ROAD LO*D   1.2  KW(  12.3  HP)
                                                                                              GASOLINE
                                                                                              ODOMETER    »721
                                                      RELATIVE HUMIDITY  31  PCT
                                                      ABSOLUTE HUMIDITY   S.H  GM/KG(  -»o.s  GRAINS/LB)
                                                               NOX HUMIDITY  C.F.   .Rh03
                                                            1
                                                    COLD TRANSIENT
                                                     7b?.n (30-0)
                                                     73b.b (21.0)
                                                      12.8 (101.0)
                                                      7b.b (5705.1)
           81
           10
                                                        2/  2/
                                                       ,?/  2/
          80.5/11/
                                                                11
                                                               370

                                                     b7.1/  3/  1.21
                                                                Ob
                                                                11
           1.0/  3/
           II. 5/  2/
           I.I/  2/
               10.73
                 71
                351
               1.15
                                                          3.1b
                                                         31.27
                                                        lb!2.S
                                                          1.23

                                                       .55  (    .81)
                                                     S.18  (  8.P2)
                                                    282.8  ( 151.1)
                                                       .22  (    .35)
                                                    12.51  ( 18.80)
                                                     5.70  (  3.51)
   .1* (   .23)
  1.31 (  2.10)
2b1.5H (H33.7b)
   .13 (   .22)
 11.bl ( 20.2b)
                                 STABILIZED
                               7b2.0 (30.0)
                               73b.h (21.0)
                                12.2 (108.0)
                               131. fc
                                     .20
                                     .15
                                  Ib73.1
                                 .03  (    .05)
                                 .15  (    .25)
                               270.3  (  »3f.1)
                                 .12  (    .11)
                               11.55  (  20.37)
                                b.11  (   3.85)
HOT TRANSIENT
7b2i.O (30-Q)
73b.b (21.n)
 13.3 (IIO.U)
    10581
 7b.1 (2b17.b)
13. 2/ 2/
11. 2/ 2/
H.5/13/
8.1/13/
11. 0/ 3/
1.0/ 3/
5.0/ 2/
1.7/ 2/
17.71
3
b
.bl
13
11
11
8
.75
.Ob
5
2




15. O/ 2/
11. 3/ 2/
28.2/13/
3.8/13/
bl.1/ 3/ 1
3.b/ 3/
5.5/ 2/
l.O/ 2/
12.13
5
22
1.05
15
11
27
1
.10
.Ob
fa
1




      .20
     2.00
   llbB.1
      .58

  .01 (   .Ob)
  .35 (   .57)
258.3 ( 115.b)
  .10 (   ,lb)
11.05 ( 21.28)
 S.bl (  3.53)

-------
                                           TABLE
VEHICLE NO.  2tt
VEHICLE MODEL   ?B VOLVO
ENGINE 2.1 LCIIO CID) L-
TRANSMISSION A3
GVW     0 KG(    -n LBS)
BAROMETER 7ft.98 MM HG(29.31 IN HG)
DRY BULB TEMP. 25.0 DEG C(77.0 DEG F)
BAG RESULTS
   BAG NUMBER
   DESCRIPTION
   BLOWER DIF P MM. H20(IN. H20)
   BLOWER INLET P MM. H20(IN. H20)
   BLOWER INLET TEMP. DEG. C(DEG. F)
   BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
   CVS FLOW STD. CU. METRES(SCF)
              METER/RANGE/PPM
              METER/RANGE/PPM
              METER/RANGE/PPM
              METER/RANGE/PPM
              ME1ER/RANGE/PCT
              METFR/RANGE/PCT
              METER/RANGE/PPM
              METER/RANGE/PPM
   DILUTION FACTOR
   HC  CONCENTRATION PPM
   CO  CONCENTRATION PPM
   002 CONCENTRATION PCT
   NOX CONCENTRATION PPM

   HC  MASS GRAMS
   CO  MASS GRAMS
   C02 MASS GRAMS
   NOX MASS GRAMS

   HC  GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
   Co  GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
   C02 GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
   NOX GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
   FUEL CONSUMPTION BY CB L/IOOKM(MPG)
   CALCULATED DISTANCE KM (MILES)

COMPOSITE FTP RESULTS
   HC  GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
   CO  GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
   C02 GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
   NOX GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
   FUEL CONSUMPTION BY CB L/lflOKM (MPG)




*J
NJ
^J

HC SAMPLE
HC BCKGRD
CO SAMPLE
CO BCKGRD
C02 SAMPLE
C02 BCKGRD
NOX SAMPLE
NOX BCKGRD
            VEHICLE EMISSION RESULTS
                   FTP  SET

           TEST NO.       RUN
           DATE  1/lb/79
           TIME
           DYNO NO.  3
           CVS NO.    2
           BAG CART NO.  1
                                                                                                          PROJECT NU.  ll-171*b-0nl

                                                                                             TEST WEIGHT   1591 KG(   3500 LBS)
                                                                                             ACTUAL ROAD LOAD   9.2 KW(  12.3  HP)
                                                                                             GASOLINE
                                                                                             ODOMETER      -n
                                                     RELATIVE HUMIDITY H2 PCT
                                                     ABSOLUTE HUMIDITY  8.5 GM/KG( 59.5 GRAINS/Lb)
                                                              NOX HUMIDITY C.F.  .9322

COLD
7b2
7f9
f 3

75
70.
12.
81.
3.
70.
3.
10.
' *









1

TRANSIENT
.0 (30*
.3 (29.
.3 (110
f05b7
0)
5)
.n)

.9 (2b82.0)
9/ 2/
I/ 2/
H/ll/
2/11/
7/ 3/ 1
7/ 3/
O/ 2/
5/ 2/
10. If
bO
353
1.23
9.5
P.b3
31.23
170b.7
1.29
71
12
37b
10
.28
.Ob
10
1










2

STABILIZED
7b2
7f9
H2

130
11.
13.
8.
b.
f 5.
3.
3.
•









•0 (30-
.3 (29.
.2 (108
b9bf 5
0)
5)
.0)

.b (fb!2.9)
S/ 2/
2/ 2/
b/13/
b/13/
9/ 3/
B/ 3/
2/ 2/
f/ 2/
lb.95
-1
2
.73
2.8
-.07
.32
1755.1
.bb
u
13
B
b
.79
.Ob
3
0










HOT
7b2
7f 9
f 3

7b
lb.
15.
2b.
5.
b2.
3.
5.
•









3


TRANSIENT
•0 (30«
.3 (29.
.3 (110
f Ob99
.2 (2b9
7/ 2/
O/ 2/
1/13/
2/13/
a/ 3/ i
9/ 3/
I/ 2/
f/ 2/
11.93
3
19
I.Ob
t.7
.13
1.71
If 8*. 2
.bf
0^
5)
.0)

0-f)
17
IS
25
5
.12
.Ob
5
0









7b2
7f 9
f 3

210
18.
22.
b5 .
3.
72.
3.
5.
1.









4
SET-7
•0 (30.
.3 (29.
.3 (110
112257


0)
5)
.0)

.1 (7f20.8)
b/ 2/
9/ 2/
2/13/
1/13/
3/ 3/ 1
b/ 3/
B/ 2/
I/ 2/
10. lb
-2
58
1.2b
f .8
-.25
If .20
f853.3
1.80
19
23
b3
3
.31
.Ob
b
1









           S.H5 (  8.7b)
          297.b ( t78.9)
            .23 (   ,3b)
          13.13 ( 17.92)
           5.73 (  3.5b)
   .10 (    .15)
  1.25 (   2.ni)
283.00 (tS5.35)
   .13 (    .22)
 12.18 (  19.32)
                                                                         -.01 (  -.02)
                                                                          .05 (   .09)
                                                                        288.* ( fbf.O)
                                                                          .11 (   .17)
                                                                        12.31 ( 19.11)
                                                                         b.09 (  3.78)
  .02 (   .01)
  .30 (   ,'*9)
2bl.8 ( -»21.2)
  .11 (   .18)
11.20 ( 21.01)
 5.fa7 (  3.52)
 -.01 (  -.U2)
  .bb (  l.Ub)
22b.l ( 3K3.8)
  .08 (   .1H)
 9.b9 ( 2*.27)
21.Hb ( 13.3t)
COMBINED FUEL ECONOMY L/100KM (MPG)
 11.Ob ( 21.27)

-------
                                           TABLE
^
to
co
VFHICLF. NO.  ?fu
VEHICLE MOnFL   >n vni vn ?H>M)L
ENT.INE ?. 1 L( Mn cm) L-i
TRANSMISSION 41
GVw     11 K G (    - n L R 3 1
RAPOMfTE" Jlfc.R* MM HG(?9.01 IN HG)
DRY BULB TpMp. ?9.M nET, C(85.n OEG f

HAT, R F S11L T S
   HAG HiJMflfp
   DESCRIPTION
   HLOWE" DIF P MM. H?OfIN. H?0)
          IN|. FT ° MMt H?0(IN. H?0)
          INLET TF«P. OFG. C(DEG. F:
          REVOLUTIONS
   CVS FLO* STO. CD. MFTRES(SCF)
       SAMPLF
                TFR/RANGF. /PPM
       UCKGRD
              MFTFR/RANGF./PCT
              MFTFR/RANGE/PCT
              MpTf R/RANGE/PPM
   HC
   HC
   cn
   Cn
   CO?
   CO?
   NOX
   NOX
   DILUTION FACTOR
   HC  CONCENTRATION PPM
   CO  CONCENTRATION PPM
   co? CONCENTRATION PCT
   NOX CONCENTRATION PPM

   HC  MASS GRAMS
   CO  MASS GRAMS
   CD? MASS GRAMS
   NOX MASS G"*M3

   HC  GRAMS/KM fGRAMS/MlLE)
   CO  GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
   CO? GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
   NOX GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE!
   FUEL CONSUMPTION HY c«
   CALCULATFD DISTANCE KM (MILES)

COMPOSITE FTP RFSULTS
   HC  GHAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILt)
   CO  GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
   CO? GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
   NOX GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILF)
   FUFL CONSUMPTION HY CB L/lOnKM (MRG)
 VEHICLE EMISSION RESULTS
        FTP

TEST NO.       RUN
DATE  3/19/79
TIME 13123
DYNO NO.  3
CVS NO.   2
BAG CART NO.  1
                                                                                                                PROJECT NO.  ll-»7»b-001

                                                                                                   TEST HEIGHT   1511 KG(  3500 LBS)
                                                                                                   ACTUAL ROAD LOAD   9.2 KW(  12.3  HP)
                                                                                                   GASOLINE
                                                                                                   ODOMETER
                                                     RELATIVE HUMIDITY  73  PCT
                                                     ABSOLUTE HUMIDITY  11.? GM/KG(i37.8  GRAINS/LB)
                                                                                                              NOX HUMIDITY C.F,  l.»185
                                                   COLD  TRANSIENT
                                                     7b?.0  (30.0)
                                                     7<»9.3  (?9.5)
                                                     HI.7  (107.0)
                                                         HOblS
                                                     75.3  (2bbO.S)
bS.l/

98,4/J
  .B/ll/
b9,3/ 3/ 1


 lib/ 2/

    10,2b
      57
  b8
  13
 523
   2
1.25
 .Ob
   B
                                                              i. to
                                                               2.47
                                                              43.50
                                                             Ib53.b
                                                               1.2b
                                                           7.55 { 12.15)
                                                          287.0 ( fbl.8)
                                                            .22 (   .35)
                                                          12.81 ( lS.3b)
                                                           5,7b (  3,58)
                                                   .12 (   .20)
                                                  2,bl (  H.21)
                                                28».?1 (H57.30)
                                                   .07 (   .12)
                                                 1?,32 ( 19.09)
                                                                                STABILIZED
                                                                              7b2.0 (30.0)
                                                                              7»9,3 (29.5)
                                                                               HO.b (105,0)
                                                                                  b9b'»7
                                                                              129.H (HS71.1)
                                                                              15.3/ 2/
                                                                              13.4X ?/
                                                                              bS.S/13/
                                                                               3/
 15
 13
 b4
  2
.81
.Ob
  1
  1
               lb.44
                  3
                 59
                .75
                 .3

                 .20
                B.B9
              1777.8
                 .12

             .03 (   ,05)
            l,4b (  2.35)
           292,0 ( 4b9.9)
             ,02 {   ,03)
           12,57 ( 18.72)
            b,09 (  3,78)
                                       HOT TRANSIENT
                                       7b2.0 (30.0)
                                       7H9.3 (29,5)
                                        43.3 (110.0)
                                           H0573
                                        75.0 (2bH9,B)

                                       ?3.7/ 2/   24
                                       17.B/ BX   IB
                                       73.9/13/   73
                                        2.2/13/    S
                                       bS.3/ 3/ 1,17
                                        3.9/ 3/   ,0b
                                        2,2/ 2/    2
                                          ,b/ 2/    1

                                           11.37
                                               7
                                             b?
                                           1.11
                                            1.7

                                             .32
                                            5,88
                                          1531,1
                                          ,0b
                                         1.03
                                        2b7.S
                                          .Ob
                                        11.49
                                         5.72
                                                                                                       ,09)
                                                                                                      l.bS)
                                                                                                     430,4)
                                                                                                       ,09)
                                                                                                     20.47)
                                                                                                      3,Sb)

-------
                                            TABLE
                                                      VEHICLE EMISSION RESULTS
                                                             FTP
I
to
ID
VEHICLE NO.  ?
-------
                                              TARLF
 VFHTCI h Nil.   ?HH
 VFHICIE MnPFL    7R  VQLVO 2440L
 t NUINF  P.I I  ( 1 in  C ID)  I.-4
 TRANSMISSION  Al
 (iVW     II Kfi(     -II LHS)
 HARilMFTFk 711.If)  MM  HG(?.1.13  IN  HG)
 DRY  Hill H I£MP.  2K.7  DFG C(B().n OEG  F)
 BAT,
     K f S 1 1 L 1 S
    HAi; NIIMHf.K
    n f . S C R I P T I 0 N
    FiLOWFR DIF P
    HLOWFR INLET
    PI (II
    r vs




T)
U)
o
HT
Hf
(.0
CO
rn?
CO?
NOX
SAMpLF
HCKRHD
SAMPLE
PCKHRD
SAMPLE
RCKGRD
SAMPLE
    NOX
          MM.  H?0(IN. H?0)
          P  MM.  H?0(IN. H?0)
          TFMP.  OFT,. C(OEG.  F)
F w REVOLU1TUNS
FIIIW STD.  Cll.  METRES(SCF)
       MF ft R/HANr.K/fipM
       MF. FFR/RANGF./PPM
       MF f F fv/RANGF/PPM
       ME TFR/RANGF./PPM
       METEK/RANGE/PCT
       MF FFR/RANGE/PCT
       METFR/RANGE/PPM
       MF.TER/RANGE/PPM
    OHUrifIN FACTOR
    HC   fClNCCNTRATIDN  PPM
    Cn   CONCENTRATION  PPM
    CO?  CONCFNIRA TION  PCT
    NHX  CONCf'NTRAT ION  PPM

    HC   MASS GRAMS
    CO   MASS GRAMS
    CO?  MASS GRAMS
    NOX  MASS GRAMS

    HC   GRAMS/KM CURAMS/MILE)
    CO   GRAMS/KM ( T.RAMS/M ILE )
    CO?  GRAMS/KM (liRAMS/MILE )
    NliX  GRAMS/KM [r.RAMS/MILE)
    FUEL CONSUMPTION BY CH  I./ 100KM (MPG)
    CALCULATED  DISTANCE KM  (MILES)

COMPOSITE  FTP  RESULTS
    HC   GRAMS/KM (PRAMS/MILE)
    CO   GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
   CO?  GRAMS/KM (C-MArtS/MILE)
   NPV  GRAMS/KM IGHAMS/MlLE)
   Fl'FL CONSUMPTION RY CH  L/100KM (MPG)
                                                  VFHICLt EMISSION  RESULTS
                                                         FTP

                                                 TEST NO.        RUN
                                                 DATE  »/17/79
                                                 TIME 13:15
                                                 DYNO NO.  3
                                                 CVS  NO.   8
                                                 BAG  CART NO.  1
                                                                                                                 PROJECT NU.  ll-»7'»h-niil
                                             TEST  WEIGH I    IS 1
                                             ACTUAL  RQAU LOAD
                                             GASOLINE FM-??««-F
                                             ODOMETER    qfaP.7
                         KV.(
                                                     LPS)
                                                     .3 HP)
                                                 RELATIVE HUMIDITY  HO  PCT
                                                 ABSOLUTE HUMIDITY  ] II.7 GM/KG( 7».V  GRAINS/LH)
                                                                                                               NOX HUMIOI 1 >  C.F
COLD TRANSIENT
 774.7  (3(1.5)
 7h2.0  (311.0)
  »2.B  (101.0)
     HObll?
  75.f  (Phbl.b)
                                        .10 (    .lh)
                                       1.?? (   I .1h)
                                     2Rb.38 C»h0.78)
                                      12.32 ( 19.10)
  STABILIZED
77>*.7 (30.5)
7b2.0 (30.0)
 H2.2 (108.0)
    blbSS
121.5 (H572.9)
51.
12.
7b.
1.
71.
3.
11.
1.


O/
I/
0/1
4/1
I/
S/
4/
3/
10

2/
?/
51
13
1 / 338
I/
3/ 1.
3/ .
2/
2/
.11
47
4
21
05
11
1


lb.
14.
U.
4.
Hb.
H.
3.
1.


3/
b/
4/1
b/1
I/
n/
b/
n/
lb

321




1.
10
?
2B
24
.2
.Ob
.)?.








1708.1

•
4.
211
•
J3.
5.
1
3b
13
.7
2b
J7
70
.47
(
( 7.
( 482
(
C J.7.
( 3.

58)
14)
.2)
•»2)
Fib)
54)

•
•
212
•
12.
b.
•
2


2/
2/
3/
3/
3/ .
3/ .
2/
2/
.54
3
fa
75
.7
.19
.98
lb
15
1 1
4
81
Ob
4
1







1778.3

03
lb
.7
11
51
07
.bb
(
(
( 471
(
( 18.
( 3.

05)
2b)
.0)
17)
80")
78)
HOT TRANSIENT
774.7 (30.5J
7b2.0 (30.0)
 43.3 (110.0)
    40550
 75.2 (2b55.3)

Ifl.S/ 2X    IB
lb.3/ 2/    lb
31.8/13/    30
 3.4/13/     3
b4.3/ 3/  1.15
 3.4/ 3/   .05
 4.B/ 2/     5
  .b/ 2/     I

    11.b?
       4
      2b
    1.10
     H.3

      .lb
     P.27
   151b.2
      .bl

  .03 (    .U4)
  .40 (    ,b4)
£b4.5 ( 425.b)
                                                                                            .11 I
                                                      .1?)
                                                                                          11.32 ( 20.78)
                                                                                           5.73 (   3.5b)

-------
TABLE
                                                       VEHICLE  EMISSION RESULTS
                                                             SET
                                                               PROJECT NU.
VEHICLE NO.  211
VEHICLE MODEL   78 VOLVO 211DL
ENGINE 3.1 LU30 CIl>) L-1
TRANSMISSION A3
GVW     0 KG(    -n LBS)
BAROMF1ER 739.b5 MM HG(?9.12  tN HG)
DRY BULB TEMP, 2b.7 OEG ccau.o DEC F)
BAG RESULTS
   BAT, NUMBER
   BLOWER OIF P MM. H20(IN. H20)
   BLOWER INLET P MM. H?OUN. H?O)
   BLOWFR INLET TFMP. DEG. C(DEG. F)
   tiLOKER REVOLUTIONS
   cvs FLOW STO. cu. METRESCSCF)
              MEIEH/RANGF./PPM
              METFH/KANGE/PPM
              METER/RANGE/PPM
              MEfER/RANGE/PPM
              METF.H/RANGE/PCT
              METEH/RANGE/PCT
              METER/RANGC/PPM
              METF.R/RANGF./PPM
   DILUTION FACTOR
   HC  CONCENTRATION PPM
   CO  CONCENTRATION PPM
   C03 CONCENTRATION PCT
   NOX CONCENTRATION PPM

   HC  MASS GRAMS
   CO  MASS GRAMS
   CO? MASS GRAMS
   NOX MASS G"AMS

   HC  GRAMS/KM  (GRAMS/MILE)
   Co  GRAMS/KM  (GRAMS/MILE.)
   CO? GRAMS/KM  (GRAMS/MILF.)
   NOX GRAMS/KM  (GRftMS/MILE)
   FUEL CONSUMPTION BY  CB  L/100KM(MPG)
   CALCULATED  DISTANCE  KM  (MILES)
1
OJ
HC SAMPLE
nr BCKGRD
CO SAMPLE
CO BCKGRD
CO? SAMPLE
CO? BCKGRO
NOX SAMPLE
NOX RCKGRD
          TEST NO.       RUN
          UATF  t/17/7S
          TIME 15:10
          DYNO NO.  3
          CVS NO.    5
          BAG CART NO.  1
TEST WEIGHI   1591 KG(  35"U LBS)
ACTUAL ROAU LOAD   9.2 KW( 12.3 HP)
GASULINE EM-271-F
ODOMETER    Qb41
          RELATIVE HUMIDITY t-» PCT
          ABSOLUTE HUMIDITY 10.0 GM/KG( bq.7 GRAINS/LB)
         771.7 (30.5)
         7bg.O (30. n)
          11.1 (112.0)
           NOX HUMIDITY C.F.
         207. S (7327.8)
17.
12.
81.
1.
71.
3.
b.
I.







I/
7/
0/1
8/1
2/
b/
I/
I/
9


1.
5

19
2/
?/
3/
3/
3/ 1.
3/ .
2/
2/
.85
b
79
30
.1
.72
.07
17
13
R1
2
35
Ob
b
1







1911.1

•
•
230
9.
21.
1
03
89
.5
09
90
11
.98
(
( 1.
( 370
(
( 23.
( 13.

05)
13)
.B)
15)
7b)
33)

-------
VMUTI r  Nfi.   PIH
VMULI.f  M0l>f L   7R Vt)l. VO ?H'*r>L
t NT, INI  r . I  L ( 1 3D din  L-f
THANSI I ^S I UN  Al
         ||  KC, (    -0 LHS)
HAHIMfHH  719. !•»
UPY HIM*  T(MP. f
                  MM Hr,(?q.Jtn IN HG)
                  ,f |H G  C(81.r< DF.t  F)
H»G
MM. Hi
P MM.
HAG 'JilMflf R
HI nwF- H  OIF  P
n| Ortl; R  I'H.F T
        INLF T
        REVOLUTIONS
CVS FLOW  STD.  CU. METRES(SCF)
                        HfIN.  H?0)
                        HHOCIN. H?0)
                        oer,.  CCDEG. F)
Hf
HC
CO
CO
CIV
rn?
NOX
NOX
DILI
HC
CO
CO?
N'lX
HC
CO
CO?
NOX
SAMPLF MEU R/RANGE/PPM
HCKI;RO MFTFH/RANGF/PPM
SAMPLE MK re R/RANGF/PPM
MCKGRD METFT/RANGF/PPM
SAMPLE METFR/RANGE/PCT
RCKGRD ME' ER/RANGE/PCT
SAMPLE ME 1 FR/RANGE/PPM
HCKGfiD MF. IF H/HANUE/PPM
jriON FACTOR
CONCENTRATION PPM
CONCENTRA f ION PPM
CONCFNTRA flON PCT
CONCENTRATION PPM
MASS liRAMS
MASS GRAMS
MASS GRAMS
MASS GRAMS
   HC  GRAMS/KM ((,WAMS/HI |_E )
   cn  GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
   co? GKAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
   NOX GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
   MIFL CONSUMPTION 8Y C8  LXIUUKM(MPG)
   CAICULATEO  DISTANCE KM  (MILES)
                                           TARLF       VFHICI.E EMISSION  RESULTS
                                                              FET

                                                      TEST  NO.        RUN
                                                      DAJF   4/17/71
                                                      T 1ME  lb! 13
                                                      DYNO  NO.  3
                                                      CVS  NO.    ?
                                                      RAG  CART NO.   1

                                                      RELATIVE HUMIDITY  t? PCT
                                                      ABSOLUTE HUMIDITY
                                                                                                    TEST  WEIGHI
                                                                                                    ACTUAL ROAD  LllAD
                                                                                                    GASOLINE F.M-?7'»-F
                                                                                                    ODOMtTF.R