United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Office of Air Quality
Planning and Standards
Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
EPA-454/R-92-02:
November 1992
Air
INTEGRATED REPORTING ISSUES:
PRELIMINARY FINDINGS
-------
EPA Publication No. EPA-454/R-92-022
INTEGRATED REPORTING ISSUES
PRELIMINARY FINDINGS
Emission Inventory Branch
Technical Support Division
Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Durham, NC 27711
November 1992
-------
DISCLAIMER
This report has been reviewed by the Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, and has been approved for publication. Any mention of trade
names or commercial products is not intended to constitute endorsement or recommendation for
use.
EPA-454/R-92-022
11
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section Page
DISCLAIMER ii
LIST OF TABLES , v
1 INTRODUCTION 1
2 PROGRAM REVIEW 2
Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards (OAQPS) 2
Emission Inventory Programs 2
Annual Point Source Update 2
Emission Statements .' 7
SIP Base Year and Periodic Emission Inventory 7
Permit Programs 7
Title V Permit Program 9
New Source Review 9
Early Reductions Program 9
Emissions Trading 11
National Air Toxics Information Clearinghouse 11
Reasonably Available Control Technology/Best Available Control
Technology/Lowest Achievable Emission Rate (RACT/BACT/LAER)
Clearinghouse 11
Compliance Programs . . 11
Section 114 Reporting Requirements 13
Enhanced Monitoring and Compliance Certifications 13
New Source Performance Standards 13
Other EPA Programs . 13
Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act (SARA) 14
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act 14
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Ac4 16
The Toxic Substances Control Act 16
Allowance Trading Program (Title IV) 16
Other Federal Agencies . 18
Department of Energy (DOE) 18
Department of Defense (DOD) 18
3 DATABASE COMPARISON 19
S02 Database Comparison 19
Lead Comparison 19
Total Organic Compounds Comparison 19
References 29
APPENDIX A A-l
APPENDIX B B-l
iii
-------
LIST OF TABLES
Number Page
2-1 Comparison of EIB Program Data Elements 3
2-2 Emission Inventory Program Reporting Requirements 6
2-3 Ozone SIP Emission Inventory Requirements Under the Clean Air Act 8
2-4 Permit Program Reporting Requirements 10
2-5 Compliance Program Reporting Requirements 12
2-6 Other EPA Reporting Requirements 15
2-7 Other EPA Reporting Requirements Continued 17
3-1 NADBv2.1 TOP 50 SO2 Sources 20
3-2 AIRS/AFS Top 50 S02 Sources 21
3-3 50 Largest AIRS/AFS SO2 Sources Matched Against 50 Largest NADBV2.1
SO2 Sources 22
3-4 TRI Top 50 Lead Sources 23
3-5 AIRS/AFS Top 25 Lead Sources 24
3-6 " 25 Largest AIRS Lead Sources Matched Against 50 Largest TRI Lead
Sources 24
3-7 TRI Top 50 Total Organic Sources 26
3-8 AIRS/AFS Top 50 VOC Sources 27
3-9 50 Largest AIRS VOC Sources Matched Against 50 Largest TRI Total
Organic Sources 28
IV
-------
SECTION 1
INTRODUCTION
This report is the first step in an effort to identify ways to better integrate reporting of emissions
data within programs principally operated by the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA)
Office of Air and Radiation, as well as certain other EPA offices. The purpose of this report is
to describe the current status of emissions data reporting from industry and State air pollution
control agencies to EPA. This is accomplished by: (1) identifying emission reporting
requirements of EPA and other federal agencies, and (2) comparing emissions data reported for
the top industrial emitters in a few major EPA databases.
The next step in this effort will involve the development of options for improving the integration
of emissions data reporting. These options will be presented in two forms: (1) a report that
outlines a model program that States could adopt to better integrate and consolidate the reporting
of data from industry and to EPA, and (2) a separate report that presents options for short term
and long term modifications to EPA's emissions data reporting requirements.
The need for better integration of emissions reporting has been heightened with passage of the
Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 (CAAA). Within the provisions of the 1990 CAAA, many
new emissions reporting requirements have been established for programs such as emission
statements, operating permits, emission compliance certification reporting, acid precipitation, and
expanded SIPs. Many of these new requirements involve reporting of data by industrial sources
and/or State or local air pollution control agencies. The requirements also involve tracking and
data management by EPA.
These new requirements are in addition to several that are in existence as a result of previously
established programs. For example, since 1977 EPA has required State/local air agencies to
report annual criteria pollutant emissions for sources nationwide that emit above certain levels.
These emission data are reported to EPA's Aerometric Information Retrieval System (AIRS),
which replaced the National Emissions Data System (NEDS). In the 1980's, reporting
requirements began under Tide HI of the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act
(SARA), which particularly impact toxic air pollutants. Other requirements exist from pre-1990
CAAA activities.
The expansion of the number and kind of inventories has prompted the State Air Emissions Work
Group (SAEWG) involving representatives from EPA and State Air Pollution Program
Administrators/Association of Local Air Pollution Control Officials (STAPPA/ALAPCO) to
recommend long-term discussions of the various federal inventory programs to coordinate the
federal inventory efforts toward streamlining data collection, storage and retrieval. This effort
is in part a response to that recommendation.
-------
SECTION 2
PROGRAM REVIEW
OFFICE OF AIR QUALITY PLANNING AND STANDARDS (OAQPS)
OAQPS is responsible for managing one of the largest national databases for emissions of air
pollutants. This system is known as the Aerometric Information Retrieval System (AIRS). AIRS
contains two modules for storage of emission inventories; the AIRS/Facility Subsystem (AFS),
and the Area and Mobile Source Subsystem (AMS). In order to ensure that the data stored in
AIRS is current, EPA promulgated requirements in the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) for
States to update the information in AFS (for point sources) on an annual basis. The focus of this
portion of the report is on the reporting requirements associated with the annual AIRS point
source update, the other reporting requirements tliat OAQPS is responsible for, and how they
compare to each other. Table 2-1 provides an overview of the data elements reported for some
of the main OAQPS emissions reporting programs.
Emission Inventory Programs
OAQPS's primary tool for maintaining emission inventory data is the AIRS database. Therefore,
the bulk of all emission inventory-related data it manages must be kept on that system. Since
passage of the dean Air Act Amendments of 1990 (CAAA), all OAQPS emission inventory
guidance has specified AIRS as the tool for storing emission inventory data. As a result, the new
requirements, such as emission statements and periodic emission inventories, are compatible with
the AIRS format and will prescribe its use.
Emission statements, the annual AIRS point source update, and the SIP base year and periodic
emission inventory requirements are all additive in nature, which means that the emission
statement will be used to prepare the annual AIRS update, and the annual AIRS update will then
be used to prepare the appropriate emission inventory. Therefore the data requirements are
similar, the only significant difference being the detail required and the size cutoffs for the
various requirements. Table 2-2 is a summary of the requirements and the data needs for the
emission inventory program. The following discussion describes each reporting requirement in
more detail.
Annual Point Source Update
Title 40 Pan 51.321 of the Code of Federal Regulations requires that States annually report
source emissions for paniculate matter with an aerodynamic diameter less than or equal to a
nominal 10 micrometers (PM-10), sulfur oxides, volatile organic compounds (VOQ, oxides of
nitrogen (NO,), carbon monoxide (CO) and lead. These data are to be reported to AIRS and
must be submitted by July 1 of each year for data collected from January 1 - December 31 of
the previous year. These provisions require that States report information on emissions for any
point source that meets the following size cutoffs: on a facility basis, 100 tons per year (tpy) for
VOC, PM-10, SOX, and NOX, 1000 tpy for CO, and 5 tpy for lead; on a point basis, 25 tpy for
VOC, PM-10, SOX, and NOX, 250 tpy for CO, and 5 tpy for lead.
-------
TABLE 2-1. COMPARISON OF EIB PROGRAM DATA ELEMENTS
Data
Element
Triennial AIRS Permit Emission
Inventory Annual Program* Statement
Update
Plant - General Level
FIPS State Code
FIPS County Code
Year of Record
Plant AFS/NEDS ID
Plant Name
Plant Address
FIPS City Code
Plant
UTM Zone
UTM Easting
UTM Northing
Primary SIC Code
Type of Inventory
Point - General Level
FIPS State Code
FIPS County Code
Plant AFS/NEDS ID
Point AFS/NEDS ID
Operating hours/day
Operating days/week
Operating hours/year
percent throughput:
percent throughput:
(continued)
3
-------
TABLE 2-1. COMPARISON OF EBB PROGRAM DATA ELEMENTS (continued)
Data
Element
Triennial AIRS Permit Emission
Inventory Annual Program* Statement
Update
percent throughput
percent throughput
Stack Level
FIPS State Code
FIPS County Code
Plant AFS/NEDS ID
Stack AFS/NEDS ID
Stack Height
Stack Diameter
Plume Height
Segment - General Level
FIPS State Code
FIPS County code
Plant AFS/NEDS ID
Point AFS/NEDS ID
Segment AFS ID
SCC Number
Process Rate Units
Actual Annual
Ozone Season
CO Season Process
Stack ID for Segment
S
(continued)
-------
TABLE 2-1. COMPARISON OF EIB PROGRAM DATA ELEMENTS (continued)
Data
Element
Triennial AIRS
Inventory Annual
Update
Permit Emission
Program* Statement
Segment Pollutant Level
FIPS State Code
FIPS County Code
Plant AFS/NEDS ID
Point AFS/NEDS ID
Segment AFS ID
Pollutant/CAS Code
Primary Control Device Code
Secondary Control Device Code
Control Efficiency
SIP Regulation in Place
Compliance Year for Segment
Emission Limitation Description
, Emission Limitation Value
Emission Limitation Units
Emission Estimation Method
Emission Factor
Annual Nonbanked Emissions
Rule Effectiveness
Ozone Season Emissions
, CO Season Emission
'Proposed AFS permit enhancement!
-------
TABLE 2-2. EMISSION INVENTORY PROGRAM REPORTING REQUIREMENTS
Annual AIRS Update Emission Statements
(baseyear and perodic)
Statutory Requirement 40 CFR 51321
Agency
State to EPA
Section 182(a)(3)(B)
Source to State
Section 172(c)(3)
Section 182(8X1)*
Section 182(a)(3)(Ar
Section 187 (a)(l)k
State to EPA
Pollutant
Due Date
Period
Size Cutoff
Data Requirements
Data System
PM-10, sulfur oxides,
VOC, NO,, CO, and lead
My 1
annual
facffity-100 tpy PM-10,
sulfur oxides. VOC, and
NO,, 1000 tpy CO, 5 tpy
lead
point-25 tpy PM-10,
sulfur oxides, VOC, and
NO,, 250 tpy CO, and 5
tpy lead
general plant
information, year of
inventory, general
operating parameters,
emissions data, and
control equipment data
(see Appendix A for
detailed requirements)
AIRS
VOC, NO,
April IS
annual
25 toy VOC or NO, in
nonattainment area, 50
toy VOC or 100 toy NO,
in attainment portion of
transport region
source identification,
source emissions data
(annual and typical
summer day), control
equipment data, process
rate ^ata and a
certification that the data
are accurate (see
Appendix A for detailed
requirements)
all criteria pollutants
November 15
1992, every 3 years
thereafter*
point sources-10 tpy
VOC, 100 tpy NO,, and
CO, 100 toy PM-10
moderate,
70 toy PM-10 serious
general plant
information, year of
inventory, source
operating data, physical
data (Le^ stack height).
process rate data, source
emissions data, and
emission limitation data
(see Appendix A for
detailed requirements)
State designated System AIRS
for ozone
for CO
*the periodic inveatoty requirement a 'only for ozone ncnaoainment ami
-------
Emission Statements
Section 182(a)(3)(B) of the CAAA requires States with marginal and above ozone nonattainment
areas to revise their State implementation plan (SIP) to require sources with VOC or NOX
emissions greater than 25 tons per year (tpy) to report their emissions on an annual basis
beginning no later than November 1993. Attainment portions of a transport region are also
required to submit emission statements for sources which emit greater than 50 tpy VOC or
sources which emit greater than 100 tpy NO, per the requirements of Sections 184(b)(2) and
182(f). These data will provide the State with the information required for the annual AIRS
update for VOC and NO,. Appendix B includes the sample forms that EPA has suggested in the
emission statement guidance. The emission statement data will be gathered by the State and
provided to EPA in a summary report which will be reported to AIRS.1
SIP Base Year and Periodic Emission Inventory
The generic requirement for a SIP baseyear inventory is described in Section 172(c)(3). It
requires a State to submit a 1990 inventory for any criteria pollutant for which the area is
designated nonattainment The specific requirements for ozone are described in Section 182.
Section 182(a)(l) of the CAAA requires States to submit to EPA a current inventory of actual
emissions for VOC, NOX, and CO for ozone nonattainment areas. The base year inventory, as
it is referred to in EPA's emission inventory guidance, is to reflect emissions for the year 1990
and is to be submitted to EPA in final form by November 15, 1992.2'3 The point source data,
which are only one portion of the emission inventory, can be developed from data collected as
part of the emission statement requirements and the annual AIRS update.
Section 182(a)(3)(A) requires States to submit a current inventoiy of actual emissions of VOC,
NO, and CO to EPA every 3 years. These inventories are referred to as periodic emission
inventories, and they have the same data requirements as the base year inventory. Periodic
emission inventories will be due no later than November 15, 1995, and every 3 years thereafter
until the area reaches attainment, Table 2-3 provides an overview of the emission inventory
requirements associated with the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990.
In addition to the mainframe database capabilities of AIRS, States can use the SIP Air
Management System (SAMS) and/or the AMS-Personal Computer (AMS-PC) programs to
provide emission inventory data to AIRS. SAMS and AMS-PC are PC tools that have been
available to the States to assist them in preparing an approvable emission inventory.
Permit Programs
Title V of the CAAA specifies that EPA is to develop rules to establish minimum elements of
a State permit program. The State is then to adopt their own permit program within 3 years of
enactment (November 15, 1993). Title V permits must comply with other parts of the CAAA
such as new source review and Tide IV. OAQPS is currently developing the capability in AIRS
-------
TABLE 2-3. OZONE SIP EMISSION INVENTORY REQUIREMENTS UNDER THE CLEAN AIR ACT
oo
Type Marginal Moderate
Bueyear X X
Adjusted X
Projection X
Projection
Projection
Projection
Projection
Projection
Projection
Modelers X
Modelers X
Modelers
Modelers
Modelers
Modelers
Modelers
Periodic X
Periodic
Periodic
Periodic
Periodic
Periodic
Reconciliation
Reconciliation
Reconciliation
Reconciliation
Reconciliation
Footnote*:
* actual emiiiion*
* projected embiioni
* indu
M*h
b.d,grh
M,g,h
b.d,g.h
M.8Ji
a.d.c.i
b.d.f,j
a.d.c.i
b.d.f,j
MAI
b,d,f.j
b,d,f,j
a,c,d
a,c,d
a.c,d
a,c.d
a,c,d
a,c,d
«.««,8
.d.8
A8
a.d.g
,d,g
baud on itandard growth factors, adjuiled FMVCP for future effect. u*e of MOBILB4.
and to be creditable, enforceable transportation control measure*
modeler's bueyear inventory
modeler*! ntoiectie
in inventory
indudei epiiodic day(i) lemperatuie, etc., biogenici. ipecitlion,
(riddin|
itrnc u modeler*! baieyew inventory adjuiled for growtli and conlroli
djutUd to limit credilabilily of certain reduction! per Section
IS2(bXIXD)
-------
to hold all the data that will be required by the permit program. Table 2-4 is a summary of the
permit-related reporting requirements that OAQPS tracks or will track.
Title V Permit Program
EPA's final permit regulation (57 FR 32250) adds a new part 70 to the CFR. It requires many
sources to obtain a revised operating permit at least every 5 years. The reporting requirements
are discussed in Part 70.5.4 These data elements (as described in Table 2-4 and Appendix A) are
a minimum for federal purposes, but a State may require more information under State law. EPA
believes that the permit should have adequate information for the State to determine whether the
permit assures compliance with the Clean Air Act These data will be stored in AFS, and to
avoid duplication of State effort, AFS is undergoing enhancements to include those data elements
that are not currently required in the system.
The regulation also calls for annual compliance certification and semiannual reporting of
monitoring results. These compliance certifications will follow the requirements set forth in the
enhanced monitoring and compliance certification regulation as required by Section 114(a)(3),
which is discussed below.
The 40 CFR Part 70.9 discusses the permit fees and allows the State the flexibility of setting up
their own fee system. The fees can be based on actual or allowable emissions, which may
require an additional reporting burden on the State, because actual emissions would require
annual reporting to calculate the appropriate fees. At this time, the State is allowed the flexibility
of determining the schedule for fee collection, which may make integration difficult
New Source Review
Section 172(c)(5) requires that all new or modified major stationary sources have permits for
construction and operation. A State's permit program may include information other than that
specified in Table 2-4 or Appendix A, as long as these minimum requirements are met5 The
requirements for new source review remain in effect with the advent of Title V.
Early Reductions Program
EPA's proposed early reduction regulation (56 FR 27338) requires a source to demonstrate
through a one time showing that it has achieved a 90 percent reduction from baseyear emissions
for certain hazardous air pollutants (as defined in Section 112), a 95 percent reduction for
hazardous air pollutants (HAPs) measured as particulates and a 90 percent reduction from
baseyear emissions for those high-risk pollutants (as defined in 56 FR 27354). The
demonstration will include the following information: the sum of the estimated emissions of all
HAPs listed in Section 112(b) that are emitted by the source's emission points in the baseyear
(the post-control emissions sums must be 10 percent or less of the sum of the baseyear emissions
or 5 percent or less for HAPs which are particulates) and the sum of the estimated emissions of
high risk pollutants that are emitted by the emission points in the source in the baseyear. This
demonstration must be federally enforceable and therefore must be reflected in the source's
operating permit (see discussion of Title V permit program).6
-------
TA1ILK 2-4. PERMIT PROGRAM REPORTING REQUIREMENTS
Statutory
Agency
Pollulanl
Rqml. Tillc V
source
Title V
to Stale
all criteria pollutants, all HAI's,
CFC's. HCFC's
New Source
Review
Section I72(c)(5)
source to Stale
all criteria
pollutants
Early Reductions
Program
Section 112(1X5)
source to Stale
all hazardous pollutants as
defined in Section I12(b)
Emissions Trading
Program
none
source to Slate
all criteria pollutants
National Air Toxics
Clearinghouse
(NATICH)
Section 112(1X3)
Slate/local agency to
EPA
any toxic air pollutant
(i-tf., any noncriteria
air pollutant)
RACT/DACT/LAER
Clearinghouse
Stale/local agency tu
EPA
Due Date I year after approval of Stale
permit program; 12 months after
operation of a major stationary
source
Period not more than every 5 years
Size Cutoff "major"** all NSPS. NESHAP
sources
Data Rqmls. general company information.
plant description, emissions
information, regulatory
requirements and compliance
information (see Appendix A
for detailed rqmts)
Data System AIRS
prior to construction reduction must be achieved
or operation of a new before 1/1/94, therefore
or modified major demonstration must come
source before then
not more than every
5 years
"major'"
legal authority,
technical
specifications,
emission compliance
demonstration,
definition of excess
emissions,
administrative and
other conditions (see
Appendix A for
detailed rqmls)
AIRS
one-time showing, part of
permit
any stationary source
same as permit with the early
reduction demonstration
AIRS
prior to construction
or operation of a
major source
one-time showing,
part of permit
major
same as permit
AIRS
voluntary
voluntary (plans to
update on a regular
basis)
voluntary
voluntary
voluntary
voluntary
agency name, general general company
plant information, information, plant
year permit issued, description, year permit
control equipment issued, emissions data,
data, pollutant names, control technology data,
emission limit data, compliance data
actual emission rate
data, source testing
data (see Appendix A
for detailed
requirements)
NATICH
BACT/LAER
Information System
(BL1S)
* definition of nujor depends on polluUnl (t,g.. fiir oznne ll depends on in irei's dissolution)
tddilkiful noanujar sources nuy be nklcd by lil'A rale e»nrclcd in Ulc 1990*1.
-------
Emissions Trading
In order to allow industry and States more flexibility in meeting the requirements of the 1977
Clean Air Act, EPA developed the emissions trading policy. The policy was announced in the
Federal Register on December 4, 1986 (51 FR 43814). This policy allows source-specific SIP
revisions for sources to trade emission reductions credits (ERC's) with other sources to meet
some emission limitations. All ERC's must be permanent, real, quantifiable, (federally)
enforceable, and surplus (i.e., not otherwise needed for an attainment strategy or other already
existing control requirement). To make these trades enforceable, each transaction must be
approved through operating or construction permits (see discussion of Title V permit program)
or an appropriate SIP revision.
National Air Toxics Information Clearinghouse
EPA has established the National Air Toxics Information Clearinghouse (NATICH) to support
State and local agencies in the control of non-criteria air pollutants. The Clearinghouse is
intended to minimize duplication of effort and to facilitate information exchanges among EPA,
State and local agencies. Part of the NATICH effort includes a database which contains
information on State and local agency and EPA activities in air toxics. This database also
includes information on permitting and source testing for various facilities. EPA, in conjunction
with STAPPA/ALAPCO, sends out data collection forms on an annual basis to all State and local
agencies for updating. The database is then updated voluntarily by the State and local agencies
with regard to permitting and source testing data.7
Reasonably Available Control Technology/Best Available Control Technology/Lowest
Achievable Emission Rate (RACT/BACT/LAER) Clearinghouse
EPA has established the RACT/BACT/LAER Clearinghouse to support State and local agencies
in determining appropriate control technologies for different industries. This Clearinghouse, like
NATICH, is to facilitate information exchange between EPA, State and local agencies. The
Clearinghouse has established a database, the BACT/LAER Information System (BLIS), which
contains permit information and control technology determinations. The information collected
in BLIS is summary data only and voluntary.
Compliance Programs
The Stationary Source Compliance Division (SSCD) of OAQPS is responsible for ensuring that
the provisions of the CAAA are enforced. As part of this function, SSCD tracks the Section 114
reporting requirements, the compliance certification reporting requirements, and the excess
emission reporting requirement that is part of the New Source Performance Standards (NSPS)
of 40 CFR Pan 60. Table 2-5 summarizes the reporting requirements that relate to compliance
programs.
11
-------
TABLE 2-5. COMPLIANCE PROGRAM REPORTING REQUIREMENTS
Section 114
Compliance Certification
New Source Performance
Standards
Statutory
Requirement
Agency
Pollutant
Section 114
source to EPA
a& criteria pollutants
Section 114(aX3)
source to EPA
an criteria pollutants and
40CFRPart60
source to EPA
SO* NO,, total reduced
Due Date
Period
Size Cutoff
Data Requirements
30 days after quarter
ends
quarterly or semiannuafly
100 tpy
general company
information, pollutant,
compliance information,
operating information
Data System
AIRS
an hazardous air pollutants
as defined in Section
112(aXD
30 days after quarter ends
quarterly and annual
summary
"major"
general company
information, pollutant, ,
emission information,
description of enhanced
monitoring system,.
summary of compliance
demonstration, deviation
description, violation
information, and operation
data (see Appendix A for
detailed requirements)
AIRS
sulfur, hydrogen sulfide,
CO, opacity
30 days after reporting
period ends
quarterly
as specified in standard
pollutant, reporting period,
general company
information, emission
limitation, monitor
manufacturer and model
number, date of last CMS
certification or audit,
process units description,
total source operating time,
emissions data, CMS
performance data (see
Appendix A for detailed
requirements)
AIRS
* definition of major depend* on poUmaat (*.?.. for ozone it depends on an area's datiifiotiaa)
12
-------
Section 114 Reporting Requirements
Section 114 empowers EPA with the authority to require periodic reporting of the data necessary
to determine a source's compliance status and emission estimates for sources subject to
nonattainment SIP requirements, new source performance standards, and national emission
standards for hazardous air pollutants (NESHAPS). Through AIRS, SSCD tracks the Section 114
reporting requirements. The SSCD is drafting a document that will describe the basic reporting
requirements and the current compliance status for each EPA Regional Office.
Enhanced Monitoring and Compliance Certifications
Section 114(a)(3) requires any major stationary source to submit compliance certifications to
EPA. According to Section 114(a)(3) these compliance certifications shall include identification
of the applicable requirement that is the basis of the certification; the methods used for
determining the compliance status of the source; the compliance status; and whether compliance
is continuous or intermittent Draft regulations are currently undergoing internal agency review
as a new 40 CFR Part 64. These regulations will require that compliance certifications be
submitted on an annual basis, as well as submission of quarterly enhanced monitoring reports
detailing any deviations from applicable requirements of the Act A deviation is defined as
emissions that exceed an emission limit; a process or control parameter that deviates from a
required process or control system parameter limit; and any other conditions in which the
enhanced monitoring indicates that the applicable emission limit has not been met EPA is
providing the State with sample summary forms for quarterly deviation reports (not yet available)
to use as a template. Some of these data will eventually be stored in AIRS, but how much has
not yet been determined.8'9
New Source Performance Standards
EPA promulgated regulations under 40 CFR Part 60 establishing new source performance
standards (NSPS) for over 60 source categories. Part of the NSPS program establishes reporting
requirements for sources which EPA tracks, they are referred to as excess emission reports. The
excess emission report is required for all sources which are subject to the installation of a
continuous monitoring system (CMS). These reports must be submitted semiannually or more
frequently if required in the specific NSPS for that source or quarterly for those sources that use
the CMS for compliance determinations.
OTHER EPA PROGRAMS
A number of programs that track emissions are maintained by EPA in offices other than OAQPS.
These programs are not all designed for developing emissions inventories, but may contain some
emissions data that are similar to data contained in the reporting programs previously discussed.
The programs investigated are the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act (SARA);
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA); Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA); Toxic Substance Control Act (TSCA); and the
Allowance Trading Program (Title IV). Each of these programs was investigated to determine
the following information:
i
13
-------
Primary purpose
Who is affected
What materials are included
"Trigger level" (usually the quantity of material used or released that require a report to
be filed)
When the report is to be filed
How often the report is updated
Who receives the report
What information is included in the report
Super-fund Amendments and Reauthorization Act (SARA)
The Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act was enacted in 1986 to amend CERCLA.
SARA contains two subtitles which require reporting to EPA or to the public. Subtitle A -
Emergency Planning and Notification (Section 304 - Emergency Release Notification) requires
any owner/operator of a covered facility which emits any "extremely hazardous substance" as
defined by EPA or any "hazardous substance" as defined by CERCLA to report to the National
Response Center. The report must be submitted immediately upon release. The activity levels
must be in excess of the published thresholds.
Subtitle B - Reporting (Section 313 - Toxic Chemical Release Report) requires manufacturers,
processors, and users of listed "toxic chemicals" to annually report their routine and accidental
emissions of the chemicals into the air, land or water. The owners or operators of facilities that
have 10 or more employees, are classified as manufacturing industries (SIC 20-39), or have
emissions exceeding published thresholds must submit an annual report A facility must meet
these reporting requirements if the amount of chemicals used is 10,000 Ibs/yr or greater, or if the
chemicals manufactured or processed at the facility are 25,000 Ibs/yr or greater. This annual
report is due July 1 and is to be reported to EPA via Form R (see Appendix B) through the Toxic
Release Inventory (TRI) system.
Table 2-6 includes a summary of the requirements of both subtitles of SARA
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
RCRA was established in 1976 to aid in the management of hazardous waste from generators.
RCRA requires that any facility that generates 100-1000 kg of non-acutcly hazardous waste per
month (small quantity generators); greater than 1 kg acutely hazardous waste; or greater than
1000 kg non-acutely hazardous waste per month (large quantity generators) must report biennially
to EPA. Table 2-6 includes a summary of the requirements of RCRA.
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act
CERCLA establishes "no-fault" liability for hazardous substance releases by allowing
governments to either spend funds to clean up before seeking reimbursement from liable parties
or sue to compel responsible parties to clean up. CERCLA requires that any owner/operator of
a facility or vessel which releases any chemicals noted by: Sections 307 or 311 of Clean Water
14
-------
TABLE 2-6. OTHER EPA REPORTING REQUIREMENTS
Statutory
Rqmt.
Agency
Pollutant
SARA
Subtitle A
source to public
hazardous substances as
SARA
Subtitle B
source to EPA
EPA designated "toxic
RCRA
40 CFR Subtitle C
source to EPA
hazardous waste as
defined by
Due Date
Period
Size Cutoff
Data Rqmt
defined by CERCLA,
extremely hazardous
substances as defined by
EPA
immediately upon release
no routine reporting
any episode that releases
more than published
reportable quantity
chemical name or
identity, quantity
released, time and
duration of release, media
into which released.
anticipated health risks.
medical attention
requirements, precautions.
evacuation information,
name of person to contact
for more information
chemicals"
July 1
annual
chemicals used >= 10,000
Ibs/yr, chemicals manufactured
or processed >= 25,000 Ibs/yr
Data System none
chemical identity, name,
location and principle business
identity, certification by senior
officials of business, use of
each listed chemical, maximum
on-site quantity at any time,
amount (Ibs/yr) released to the
environment of each chemical,
amount (Ibs/yr) transferred off-
site, method of waste treatment
and disposal including
treatment efficiency, release
data (fugitive air emissions in
Ibs/yr, stack/point air emissions
in Ibs/hr. wastewater
discharges, releases to land,
transfers to off-site locations.
underground injection)
Toxic Release Inventory (TRI)
40 CFR 261.31, acutely
hazardous waste as defined by
40 CFR 261.33
biennial
small generators: 100-1000 kg
non-acutely hazardous
waste/month
large generators: > 1 kg
acutely hazardous waste, >
1000 kg non-acutely
hazardous waste/month
EPA ID number, record of
hazardous waste transfers
(manifests), records of any
test results, waste analyses,
etc., waste minimization plan
Biennial Reporting System
(BRS)
15
-------
Act, Section 3001 of RCRA, Section 112 of dean Air Act, Section 7 of Toxic Substances
Control Act, or others designated by EPA under Superfund to report to EPA upon release of that
substance. This provision requires a report as a result of any release to environment Table 2-7
includes a summary of the requirements of CERCLA.
The Toxic Substances Control Act
TSCA was established in 1976 by Congress to control the manufacture, distribution and disposal
of toxic chemicals. TSCA defines toxic substances as those chemical substances occurring in
whole or in part as the result of chemical reaction or occurring nature, as well as any element
or combined radical The following are not considered by TSCA: pesticides, tobacco, tobacco
products, pistols, firearms, revolvers, shells and cartridges, foods, food additives, drugs, and
cosmetics. The specific target of TSCA is polychlorinated biphenols (PCB's). TSCA requires
that the facility must submit a notice to EPA 90 days prior to manufacture of any of the listed
compounds. Table 2-7 includes a summary of the requirements of TSCA.
Allowance Trading Program (Title IV)
Tide IV of the CAAA established the allowance trading system for facilities affected by the acid
rain program. Under this program, emissions of SO2 will be reduced by 10 million tons from
1980 levels. Databases for calculating allowances, for tracking emissions and allowance trading,
and for tracking compliance actions are an integral part of this program.
As a first step to ensure that the 10 million ton per year reduction in SO2 emissions is attained,
EPA's Office of Atmospheric and Indoor Air Programs (OAIAP) established the National
Allowance Database (NADBv2.1). The NADBv2.1 incorporates historic data for existing utility
sources and data reported for planned sources. Emissions allowances are calculated for affected
sources from data in the NADBv2.1 according to the formulas in Title IV. The NADBv2.1 does
not necessarily encompass all potentially affected sources. For example, unaffected industrial
sources may choose to "opt-in" to the acid rain program; these sources are not listed in the
NADBv2.1 and must provide data to EPA in order to receive allowances. In addition, utility
units with generator capacities equal to or below 25 megawatts are listed in NADBv2.1, but most
of these units are not affected by Title IV. The NADBv2.1 is an historic database and will not
be updated.
The OAIAP's Acid Rain Data System (ARDS), currently under development, will become the
repository for data reported by sources affected under Title IV. The ARDS will be used to track
sources affected under Title IV and will also be used to track emissions and record allowance
trading. The first phase of Tide IV will affect approximately 110 of the largest utilities, while
the second phase (beginning in the year 2000) will affect over 800 utilities and industrial sources.
The EPA will use ARDS to verify emission reductions required under Tide IV. Emissions data
will be collected quarterly (beginning January 30, 1994 for Phase I sources and April 30, 1995
for Phase II sources), while allowance trades will require ARDS to be updated more frequendy.
In order to evaluate the effectiveness of Tide IV, OAIAP is currendy developing die Tracking
Responses to Acid Rain Compliance Requirements Database (TRAC). The TRAC will include
16
-------
TABLE 2-7. OTHER EPA REPORTING REQUIREMENTS CONTINUED
Statutory
RqmL
Agency
Pollutant
CERCLA
PL 96-510, amended
SARA 42 use Section
9601
source to State
chemicals listed in
TSCA
PL 94469, 15 USCA Section
2601
source to EPA
chemical substances listed in
Allowance Trading
(Tide IV)
Title IV of the CAAA of 1990
source to EPA
SO,, NOX
Sections 307, 311 of
Clean Water Act, Section
3001 of RCRA, Section
112 of CAA, Section 7
of Toxic Substances
Control Act, others
designated by EPA under
Superfund
Due Date upon release
Period no routine reporting
Size Cutoff any release to
environment
Data RqmL
Data System none
Section 7
notice to EPA 90 days prior to
manufacture
no routine reporting
any source that is going to
manufacture any substance
listed in Section 7
information collected and
returned, test data, identify
other known or reasonably
ascertainable data
none
30 days after end of quarter
(beginning Jan. 30. 1994 for
Phase I and Apr. 30, 1995 for
Phase n)
quarterly or more frequent as .
necessary
any facility listed in Table A,
or B of Title IV or any facility
that opts-in (Phase I approx.
110 sources. Phase II approx.
800 sources)
general plant information.
emissions data, fuel use data
NADB. ARDS, TRAC
17
-------
compliance methods used and compliance costs incurred by utilities. The information may be
used to demonstrate the effect of Title IV on the utility industry.
OTHER FEDERAL AGENCIES
Department of Energy (DOE)
The DOE has two reporting requirements that include air emissions estimation data (but not
actual emissions), Form EIA-767 and DOE Order 50400.1. The Form EIA-767 is a mandatory
form that provides information on quality and quantity of fuels, environmental equipment (from
which air emissions are estimated) and cooling systems for electric power plants. Information
on cooling systems is collected for power plants greater than 100 megawatts; all other data are
collected from power plants greater than 10 megawatts. The database is maintained electronically
and may be obtained on magnetic tape by request The contact for further information is
Mr. John Colligan, Department of Energy, (202)254-5465.
DOE Order 50400.1 requires all sites to generate an environmental protection implementation
plan which includes air monitoring requirements. Data are maintained on hard copy and are
publicly available at the DOE reading room. The contact for further information is Ms. Juliad
Berling, Department of Environmental Safety and Health, Department of Energy, (202)586-5518.
Department of Defense (DOD)
The Department of Defense currently does not maintain a central air emissions database.
However, it is the DOD's intent to develop such a database to summarize data gathered under
past and future emission inventory efforts conducted by the Departments of the Army, Navy and
Air Force. This database will be part of the Defense Corporate Information Management
(DECIM) system. In addition to this centralized database, each of the services is also developing
its own automated system to organize and summarize emission inventory and other air quality
compliance data. The Navy database is known as the Naval Air Emission Tracking System
(NAETS); the Air Force database is known as the Air Quality Utility Information System
(AQUIS). Both systems will retain source specific data which may be adapted to meet regulatory
reporting and tracking requirements.
All of the services are currently undertaking a program to meet the emission statement
requirements imposed by Title I of the CAAA. These efforts are expected to supplement the
emission inventory information which already exists within each service. The Aimy and the
Navy are conducting emission inventories at all of their major installations located in
nonattainment areas. These efforts are expected to be complete by November 1993. The Air
Force has completed emission inventories for all installations required by regulatory mandate.10
18
-------
SECTION 3
DATABASE COMPARISON
Multiple national databases were identified for air emissions of lead, SQj and total organic
compounds. Some of the databases and their components are: TRI for lead and toxic organic
compounds, NADBv2.1 for SO2, and AIRS for all three pollutants. To access the extent of
inconsistencies between the databases, the largest sources of pollutants in each database were
compared. A summary of the results of this comparison follows.
SO2 DATABASE COMPARISON
The NADBv2.1 is an historic database that contains information for utility sources potentially
affected under the Acid Rain Program established by Title IV. The SO2 emissions data are for
the year 1985 as specified by Tide IV. This database has received extensive public review and
will not be updated.
AIRS data for SO2 are usually more current than 1985. The top 50 facilities in AIRS match up
fairly well with the top 50 in NADBv2.1, with the exception of Ohio Edison-Niles. Currently,
AIRS indicates that Niles is the top SO2 emitter in the United States, however, NADBv2.1
indicates that the facility is not even in the top 100.
Tables 3-1, 3-2, and 3-3 list the top 50 SO2 sources in NADBv2.1, AIRS/AFS, and those sources
in both databases, respectively.
LEAD COMPARISON
The TRI database has been updated with 1989 data. A list of the top 50 sources was developed
for lead and lead compounds from data reported by Pacific Environmental Services Inc.11 Only
three facilities in the TRI top 50 matched the top 25 sources in AIRS. A more significant
concern is the magnitude of the differences in emissions: the top emitter for TRI only emitted
179 tons per year, while the top emitter in AIRS emitted 78 tons per year. The data in TRI are
not detailed enough to determine the cause of the differences in emissions.
Tables 3-4, 3-5, and 3-6 list the top 50 lead sources in TRI, top 25 sources in AIRS/AFS, and
those sources in both databases, respectively.
TOTAL ORGANIC COMPOUNDS COMPARISON
AIRS contains emission estimates for sources of VOC, estimated as total VOC. The TRI
database does not list VOCs, instead it reports emissions for a particular species of toxic organic
compounds. To perform the comparison of the top 50 emitters in both databases, the following
assumptions were made using the data available in TRI.
Due to the large number of records in TRI (over 12,000 for sources that have air
emissions over 100,000 pounds per year), sources included in the comparison were
limited to those greater than 500,000 pounds per year, which resulted in a list of 664 sources.
19
-------
TABLE 3-1. NADBv2.1 TOP 50 SO, SOURCES
Panlttng
1(12)
2(2)
3(3)
4(6)
5(7)
6(4)
7(5)
8(8)
9(9)
10 (10)
11 (ID
12(16)
1305)
14 (33)
15(17)
16 (18)
17 (19)
18(20)
19 (32)
20(22)
21 (14)
22(21)
23(23)
24 (24)
25(26)
26
27 (31)
28 (29)
29
30(38)
31(34)
32(25)
33 (30)
34
35 (37)
36
37 (41)
38(27)
39 (39)
40 (35)
41 (43)
42 (40)
43(47)
44(45)
45
46 (46)
47(44)
48 (49)
49 (42)
50
Plant Name
Gen J M Gavin
Cumberland
Bowen
Gibson
Labadie
Clifty Creek
Baldwin
Muslringum River
Wansley
Harrison
Kyger Creek
Conemaugh
WH Sam mis
Kincaid
Hatfield's Ferry
JM Stuart
Cardinal
ECGaston
Eastlake
Kammer
New Madrid
Big Bend
Conesville
Colben
Coffeen
Monroe
Gallatin
Yates
Ml Storm
Cayuga
Brunner Island
Paradise
Keystone
Mill Creek
Monticello
Joppa Steam
Thomas Hill
Homer City
Mitchell
Crist
Harllee Branch
Montour
Miami Fort
Johnsonville
Montrose
John E Amos
Ghent
Martin Lake
Petersburg
Fort Martin
State
OH
TN
GA
IN
MO
IN
n.
OH
GA
WV
OH
PA
OH
IL
PA
OH
OH
AL
OH
WV
MO
FL
OH
AL
n.
MI
TN
GA
WV
IN
PA
KY
PA
KY
TX
n.
MO
PA
WV
FL
GA
PA
OH
TN
MO
WV
KY
TX
IN
WV
County
Gallia
Stewart
Bartow
Gibson
Franklin
Jefferson
Randolph
Morgan
Heard
Harrison
Pallia
Indiana
Jefferson
Christian
Greene
Adams
Jefferson
Shelby
Lake
Marshall
New Madrid
Hillsborough
Coshocton
Limestone
Montgomery
Monroe
Sumner
Coweta
Grant
Vermillion
York
Muhlenberg
Armstrong
Jefferson
Titus
Massac
Randolph
Indiana
Marshall
Escambia
Putnam
Montour
Hamilton
Humphreys
Henry
Putnam
Carroll
Rusk
Pike
Monongalia
tpy
363,249
344,153
305302
304,265
269,642
268362
264,594
253,435
248,651.
234,693
222,543
181,892
180342
173561
161,081
159,685
159,563
159,288
158.277
157,034
152,325
148,681
141,576
141,140
140,629
131393
130396
129,844
128309
126,102
124^56
121.227
118.890
117,836
112,837
108384
106,616
104.103
103326
102,297
101,222
100,269
97543
96,124
96,097
95,759
94336
94028
94,171
89,133
yr of data
85
85
85
85
85
85
85
85
85
85
85
85
85
85
85
85
85
85
85
85
85
85
85
85
85
85
85
85
85
85
85
85
85
85
85
85
85
85
85
85
85
85
85
85
85
85
85
85
85
85
Note: number* in parenthesis indicate ranking in AIRS/AFS
20
-------
TABLE 3-2. AffiS/AFS TOP 50 SO2 SOURCES
Ranking
* 1 (141)
2(2)
3(3)
4(6)
5(7)
6(4)
7(5)
8(8)
9(9)
10 (10)
11 (ID
* 12 (1)
13
14(22)
15 (13)
16 (12)
17(15)
18(16)
19(17)
20 (18)
21 (22)
22(20)
23 (23)
24 (24)
25 (32)
26 (25)
27 (38)
28
29 (28)
30 (33)
31(27)
32 (19)
33 (14)
34 (31)
35 (40)
36
37 (35)
38 (30)
39 (39)
40 (42)
41 (37)
42 (49)
43 (41)
44(47)
45(44)
46 (46)
47 (43)
48
49(48)
50
Plant Name
Ohio Edison - Niles
TVA Cumberland
GA Power Bowen
IN/KY Electric Corp.
EL Power Co. Baldwin
PSI - Gibson
Union Electric Labadie
Ohio Power - Muskingum
GA Power - Wansley
Mon Power - Harrison
Ohio Valley Electric Kyger Creek
Gen James M Gavin
Magma Copper
Associated Electric
Ohio Edison - Sammis
PA Electric - Conemaugh
West Penn - Hatfield
Dayton P&L - JM Stuart
Ohio Power - Cardinal
AL Power - Gaston
Tampa Electric - Big Bend
Ohio Power - Kammer
Columbus Southern Pwr-Conesville
TVA - Colbert
TVA - Paradise
Central IL P&L - Coffeen
PA Electric - Homer City
Alcoa Generating Corp.
GA Power - Yates
PA Electric - Keystone
TVA -Gallatin
Cleveland Electric Illumination
Com Ed Kincaid
PP&L - Brunner Island
Gulf Power - Crist
TVA - Kingston
TX Utilities Electric
PSI - Cayuga
Ohio Power - Mitchell
PP&L - Montour
Associated Electric Co.
IPALCO - Petersburg
GA Power - Harllee Branch
KY Utilities - Branch
TVA - Johnsonville
App Power - John Amos
CG&E - Miami Fort
Potomac Electric - Morgantown
TX Utilities
Phelps Dodge/Hidalgo Smelter
State
OH
TN
GA
IN
IL
IN
MO
OH
GA
WV
OH
OH
AZ
MO
OH
PA
PA
OH
OH
AL
FL
WV
OH
AL
KY
IL
PA
IN
GA
PA
TN
OH
IL
PA
FL
TN
TX
IN
WV
PA
MO
IN
GA
KY
TN
WV
OH
MD
TX
NM
City
Niles
Cumberland City
Taylorsville
Madison
Baldwin
Princeton
Labadie
Beverly
Roopville
Haywood
Cheshire
Gallipolis
San Manuel
.. New Madrid
Stratton
West Wheatfield
Monongahela
Aberdeen
Brillant
Wilsonville
Gibsonton
Mounds ville
Cones ville
Tuscumbia
Drakesboro
Coffeen
Homer City
Newburgh
Newnan
Shelocta
Gallatin
Eastlake
Kincaid
East Manchester
Pensacola
Kingston
Dallas
Cayuga
Moundsville
Deny
Clifton Hill
Petersburg
Milledgeville
Ghent
New Johnsonville
St. Albans
North Bend
Newburg
Tatum
Playas
tpy
357,779
346,171
305302
280,103
277,526
272,975
252.527
252376
248,651
234,693
222,722
212,741
191,427
176,534
172,915
172,767
160,886
159,689
159394
159288
157364
157,033
141,755
137.517
137,432
137^91
135300
134,536
129,844
128,763
128,724
127,666
125,405
119,549
117,929
117,387
112,882
109,973
103329
102372
101,433
101353
101222
101,124
98,164
96,142
95,804
94,930
94228
93,831
yr of data
87
90
90
90
90
90
90
87
90
85
87
87
85
90
87
87
87
87
87
88
89
85
87
88
90
90
87
90
90
87
90
87
90
87
89
90
88
90
85
87
90
90
90
90
90
85
87
90
85
85
Note: numbers in parentheses indicate ranking in NADBv2.l
* State is looking into validity of numbers reported to AFS
21
-------
TABLE 3-3. 50 LARGEST AIRS/AFS SO, SOURCES MATCHED AGAINST 50
LARGEST NADBv2.1 SO, SOURCES
AIRS
Ranking
* 1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
* 12
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
49
NAOBv2.1
Ranking
141
2
3
6
7
4
5
8
9
10
11
1
22
13
12
15
16
17
18
22
20
23
24
32
25
38
28
33
27
19
14
31
40
35
30
39
42
37
M9
41
47
44
46
43
48
Plant Name
Ohio Edison - Niles
TVA - Cumberland
GA Power - Bowen
IN/KY Electric Corp.
IL Power Co. Baldwin
PSI - Gibson
Union Electric Labadie
Ohio Power - Muskingum
GA Power - Wansley
Mon Power Harrison
Ohio Valley Electric Kyger Creek
Gen James M Gavin
Associated Electric
Ohio Edison - Sammis
PA Electric - Conemaugh
West Penn - Hatfield
Dayton P&L - JM Stuart
Ohio Power - Cardinal
AL Power - Gaston
Tampa Electric - Big Bend
Ohio Power - Kammer
Columbus Southern Pwr-Conesville
TVA - Colbert
TVA -Paradise
Central IL P&L - Coffeen
PA Electric - Homer City
GA Power - Yates
PA Electric - Keystone
TVA -Gallatin
Cleveland Electric Illumination
Com Ed - Kincaid
PP&L - Brunner Island
Gulf Power - Crist
TX Utilities Electric
PSI - Cayuga
Ohio Power - Mitchell
PP&L - Montour
Associated Electric Co.
IPALCO - Petersburg
GA Power - Hartlee Branch
KY Utilities - Branch
TVA - Johnsonville
App Power - John Amos
CG&E - Miami Fort
TX Utilities
State
OH
TN
GA
IN
IL
IN
MO
OH
GA
WV
OH
OH
MO
OH
PA
PA
OH
OH
AL
FL
WV
OH
AL
KY
EL
PA
GA
PA
TN
OH
IL
PA
FL
TX
IN
WV
PA
MO
IN
GA
KY
TN
WV
OH
TX
City
Niles
Cumberland City
Taylorsville
Madison
Baldwin
Princeton
Labadie
Beverly
Roopville
Haywood
Cheshire
Gallipolis
New Madrid
Stratton
West Wheatfield
Monongahela
Aberdeen
Brillant
Wilsonville
Gibsonton
Moundsville
Conesville
Tuscumbia
Drakesboro
Coffeen
Homer City
Newnan
Shelocta
Gallatin
Eastlake
Kincaid
East Manchester
Pensacola
Dallas
Cayuga
Moundsville
Deny
Clifton Hill
Petersburg
Milledgeville
Ghent
New Johnsonville
St. Albans
North Bend
Tatum
NADBv2.
Itpy
30318
344,153
305302
268,862
264,594
304,265
269,642
253,435
248,651
234,693
222,543
363,249
152325
180342
181,892
161,081
159,685
159,563
159228
148,681
157,034
141 ,576
141,140
121^27
140,629
104,103
129,844
118,890
130396
158277
173.961
124556
102297
112,837
126,102
103326
100269
106,616
94,171
101222
94336
96,124
95,759
97^43
94228
AIRS
tpy
357,779
346,171
305302
280.103
277426
272575
252427
252376
248,651
234,693
222,722
212,741
176434
172515
172,767
160,886
159,689
159394
159288
157364
157,033
141.755
137417
137,432
137291
135300
129,844
128,763
128,724
127,666
125,405
119,549
117,929
112,882
109573
103329
102372
101,433
101353
101222
101.124
98.164
96,142
95,804
94228
* State is looking into validity of number* reported to AFS
22
-------
TABLE 3-4. TRI TOP 50 LEAD SOURCES
Ranking
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23 (22)
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
3,1
32
33
34
35(1)
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45 (12)
46
47
48
49
50
Plant Name
Herculaneum Smelter
ASARCO
ASARCO
Buick Smelter
ASARCO
OI-Neg TV Products
GNBInc.
DuPont Chamber Works
Kennecott Utah Copper
Ethyl Process Development
ASARCO
Mannington Ceramic Tile
ASARCO
National Standard
Zinc Corp. of America ;
KohlerCo.
USS Fairless Works
Structural Metals
Waupaca Foundry Inc.
SMI Steel
Chaparral Steel Co.
McDermott Marine Construction
Inland Steel Co.
Oregon Steel Mills
Sanders Lead Co.
Standard Industries Inc.
Franklin Smelting & Refining
Refined Metals Corp.
Roanoke Electric Steel Corp.
Coming Asahi Video Products
Gopher Smelting & Refining Co.
Interstate Lead Co.
North Star Steel
National Steel
Chemetco Inc.
OI-Neg TV Products
FL Steel Corp.
ABC Rail Corp.
FL Steel Corp.
GNB Inc.
AT&T
Refined Metals Corp.
Nucor-Yamaio Steel Co.
Eastman Kodak
Magnus Farley Inc.
FL Steel Corp.
Thomson Consumer Electronics
Quenell Enterprises Inc.
Advanced Technology Lab
GTE Products Corp.
State
MO
MT
AZ
MO
MO
OH
CA
NJ
UT
LA
TX
NC
NE
PA
PA
WI
PA
TX
WI
AL
TX
LA
IN
OR
AL
TX
PA
TN
VA
PA
MN
AL
MN
MI
EL
PA
TN
MD
FL
LA
SC
IN
AR
NY
NE
NC
OH
CA
MD
RI
County
Jefferson
Lewis and Clark
Gila
Iron
Iron
Franklin
Los Angeles
Salem
Salt Lake
East Baton Rouge
El Paso
Davidson
Douglas
Lancaster
Beaver
Sheboygan
Bucks
Gudaloupe
Waupaca
Jefferson
Ellis
St Mary Parish
Lake
Mulmomah
Pike
Bexar
Philadelphia
Shelby
Roanoke
Centre
Dakota
Jefferson
Ramsey
Wayne
Madison
Luzeme
Knox
Baltimore
Duval
Caddo Parish
Lexington
Marion
Mississippi
Monroe
Dodge
Mecklenburg
Pickaway
Los Angeles
Aroostock
Providence
tpy
179.0
40.5
39.0
36.6
36.5
30.7
28.7
26.5
25.8
25.0
22.4
20.1
17.9
172
16.0
14.6
13.8
11.3
11.1
10.8
9.4
9.0
9.0
8.7
8.6
8.1
7.9
7.7
7.6
7.1
6.9
6.8
6.2
5.8
5.8
5.6
5.6
5.4
52
5.1
5.0
4.9
4.7
4.7
4.5
4.4
4.4
42
42
3.8
yr of data
89
89
89
89
89
89
89
89
89
89
89
89
89
89
89
89
89
89
89
89
89
89
89
89
89
89
89
89
89
89
89
89
89
89
89
89
89
89
89
89
89
89
89
89
89
89
89
89
89
89
Note: numbers in parentheses indicate ranking in AIRS/AFS
23
-------
TABLE 3-5. AIRS/AFS TOP 25 LEAD SOURCES
Ranking
1(35)
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12(45)
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22 (23)
23
24
25
Plant Name
Chemetco
Granite City Steel Co.
Bethlehem Steel Corp.
IPALCO - Petersburg
Hammond Lead Products
Steel of WV Inc.
NIPSCO - Michigan City
Moebius Printing Co.
Universal Foundry
Oxide & Chemical Corp.
Hoosier Energy - Ratts Station
Magnus Div/Farly Met
Central Foundry Div. CMC
Cyprus Miami Mining
Weirton Steel
Illinois Power Co. Baldwin
Illinois Power Co. Vermillion
Salmon Bay Steel Corp.
IPALCO - Pritchard Station
IN/MI Power Co. Tanners Creek
Signode Corp.
Inland Steel Flat Products
Medusa Cement
Amalgamated Sugar
Magma Copper
State
IL
IL
IN
IN
IN
WV
IN
WI
WI
IN
IN
NE
IL
AZ
WV
IL
IL
WA
IN
IN
IL
IN
MI
ID
AZ
City
Hartford
Granite City
Chesterton
Petersburg
Hammond
Huntington
Michigan City
Milwaukee
Oshkosh
Brazil
Petersburg
Fremont
Danville
Inspiration
Weirton
Baldwin
Oakwood
Seattle
Marrinsville
Lawrenceburg
Bridgeview
East Chicago
Charleviox
Nampa
San Manuel
tpy
78.0
76.0
53.0
28.0
10.0
8.0
7.0
6.0
5.0
5.0
4.0
4.0
3.0
3.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
yr of data
90
90
90
90
90
85
90
88
88
90
90
90
90
85
85
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
85
88
85
Note: numbers in parenthesis indicate ranking in TR1
TABLE 3-6. 25 LARGEST AIRS LEAD SOURCES MATCHED AGAINST 50
LARGEST TRI LEAD SOURCES
AIRS TRI
Ranking Ranking Plant Name State City
AIRS tpy TRI tpy
1
12
22
35
45
23
Chemetco
Magnus Div/Farly Met
Inland Steel Flat Products
IL
NE
IN
Hartford
Fremont
East Chicago
78.0
4.0
1.0
5.8
4.5
9.0
24
-------
To provide a better match-up with VOC emissions reported in AIRS, the following
chemicals were excluded from the list of sources extracted from TRI with emissions
greater than 500,000 pounds per year: dichloromethane, 1-1-1 trichloroethane, chromium
compounds, ammonia, ammonium nitrate, sulfuric acid, hydrogen fluoride, chlorine,
chlorine dioxide, nitric acid, hydrochloric acid, copper compounds, zinc compounds, and
chlorofluorocarbon 113. This resulted in a list of 457 sources.
Using the file of 457 sources, the data were first sorted by common ID numbers to get all records
for a single facility together. Then the data were sorted by total emissions at a facility, resulting
in the top 50 list
Data from the TRI top 50 list were then compared with the top 50 VOC emitters from AIRS.
Eleven facilities are in both lists: Courtaulds Fibers; Eastman Kodak - Kodak Park, Tennessee
Eastman, 3M Consumer AV & Products, Hoechst Celanese, Union Carbide - Texas City, Texas
Eastman, Air Products & Chemicals - Calvert City, Shell Oil - Deer Park, and Cape Industries.
As with the lead data, the total organic data found in TRI do not match up well with the AIRS
data. This could be due to the fact that one of the largest species of VOC, ethanol, is not in the
list of compounds in TRI.
Tables 3-7, 3-8, and 3-9 list the top 50 total organic sources in TRI, AIRS/AFS, and those
sources that are in both databases, respectively.
25
-------
TABLE 3-7. TRI TOP 50 TOTAL ORGANIC SOURCES
Ranking
1(15)
2(50)
3(31)
4
5
6(47)
7(11)
8
9
10(27)
11
12(36)
13
14
15
16
17
18(7)
19
20 (23)
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43(9)
44
45
46
47
48
49
50 (33)
Plant Name
Counaulds Fibers Inc.
Tennessee Eastman Co.
3M Consumer AV & Products Plants
BASF Corp. Fibers Div.
Union Camp Corp.
Hoechst Celanese
Eastman Kodak Co. Kodak Park
Dupont Johnsonville plant
Westvaco Corp Bleached Board div.
Union Carbide Chemicals & Plastics Co. Texas city
Westinghouse Electric Corp.
Reynolds Metals Co. Alloys Plant
North American Rayon Corp.
American Synthetic Rubber Corp.
Dupont Delisle Plant
General Electric Co. Electromaterials Dept
Dupont Cape Fear Plant
Texas Eastman Co.
3M Co. Camp Bowie Indus. Area
Air Products & Chemicals Inc.
Georgia Pacific Corp. Brunswick operations
Anchor Continental Inc.
Union Carbide C&P Co. Institute WV plant operations
Farmland Industries Inc.
3MCo.
Aristech Chemical Corp.
3M Co. Visual Systems Div.
Hoechst Celanese Corp. Celriver Plant
R. R. Donnelley & Sons Co.
Eli Lilly & Co. Tippecanoe laboratories
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. Industrial div.
3M St. Paul Tape & Abrasives
Ringier America Inc.
Dupont Memphis Plant
GMC Inland Fisher Guide
Holliston Mills Inc.
Amoco Chemical Co. Chocolate bayou plant
Great Southern Paper
Westvaco Corp.
Teepak Inc.
Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.
Gencorp Polymer Products
Shell Oil Co. Deer Park Mfg. Complex
Polysar Gulf Coast Inc.
Amoco Petroleum Additives Co.
Westvaco Corp. Kraft div.
Baxter Healthcare Corp. Pharmaseal div.
3M Co. Nevada plant
3M Tape Manufacturing Div.
Cape Industries
State
AL
TN
MN
TN
GA
VA
NY
TN
VA
TX
SC
AL
TN
KY
MS
OH
NC
TX
TX
KY
GA
SC
WV
KS
IA
OH
IN
SC
IN
IN
NY
MN
MS
TN
LA
TN
TX
GA
MD
n.
NE
MS
TX
TX
MS
SC
TN
MO
n.
NC
City
Lemoyne
Kingsport
Hutchinson
Lowland
Savannah
Narrows
Rochester
New Johnsonville
Covington
Texas City
Hampton
Sheffield
Elizabeth ton
Louisville
Pass Christian
Coshocton
Leland
Longview
Brownwood
Calvert City
Brunswick
Columbia
Institute
Coffeyville
Knoxville
Haverhill
Hartford City
Rock Hill
Warsaw
Lafayette
Syracuse
Saint Paul
Corinth
Memphis
Monroe
Church Hill
Alvin
Cedar Springs
Luke
Danville
Lincoln
Columbus
Deer Park
Orange
Natchez
North Charleston
Johnson City
Nevada
Bedford Park
Wilmington
tpy
21.835
19.852
12,407
11,850
6,062
5363
4,010
3,900
3.898
3,831
3.650
3386
2.711
2,670
2,600
2370
2349
2,425
2395
2390
2355
2333
2.277
2,250
2,008
2.000
1570
1,969
1.896
1,862
1,847
1,812
1.724
1.705
1,680
1.651
1.650
1335
1320
1311
1303
1,472
1,443
1,400
1383
1382
1378
1335
1306
1.300
NOTE: numbers in parenthesis indicate ranking in AlRS/AFS
26
-------
TABLE 3-8. AffiS/AFS TOP 50 VOC SOURCES
Ranking
1
2
3
4
5
6
7(18)
8
9(43)
10
11(7)
12
13
14
15 (1)
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23 (20)
24
25
26
27 (10)
28
29
30
31(3)
32
33 (50)
34
35
36 (12)
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47 (6)
48
49
50 (2)
Plant Name
Paxon Polymer Comp.
Dow Chemical
Borden Chemical
American Cyanamid
Amoco Chemicals Corp.
Amoco Oil Co.
Texas Eastman Co.
Exxon Company
Shell Oil Co.
BP Chemicals Inc.
Kodak Park Div
Rexene Products Co.
Du Pont
US Steel Gary Works
Courtaulds North America
Exxon Refinery
Bethlehem Steel Corp.
Fasson Div Avery Products
Du Pont
Coastal Refining
Mobile Oil Corp.
Columbian Chemical Co.
Air Products and Chemicals
Weyerhaeuser Co.
Du Pont
Sinclair Oil Corp.
Union Carbide Corp.
Union Carbide Corp.
Modine Manufacturing Co.
Star Enterprise
3M Hutch Mag Media
Cenex
Cape Industries
Goodyear Tire and Rubber
Tesoro Refinery
Reynolds Metals - Cans
Radford Army Ammo
Interroyal Corp.
General Motors Corp.
Quantum Chemical Corp.
Shell Oil - Wood River
Chevron
Quantum Chemical Corp.
Ashland Chemical Co. - Kenova
Gaylord Container
Texaco Refining
Hoechst Celanese Inc.
International Paper
FM Thorpe Manufacturing
Tennessee Eastman Co.
State
LA
LA
LA
LA
AL
TX
TX
TX
TX
OH
NY
TX
TX
IN
AL
LA
IN
PA
TN
TX
TX
LA
KY
MI
NC
WY
TX
TX
MO
TX
MN
MT
NC
TX
AL
VA
PA
TX
TX
IL
TX
TX
WV
LA
KS
VA
TX
MO
TN
City
Baton Rouge
Plaquemine
Geismar
Westwego
Decatur
Texas City
Longview
Baytown
Deer Park
Shawnee
Rochester
Odessa
Beaumont
Gary
Axis
Baton Rouge
Chesterton
Quakertown
Millington
Corpus Christi
Beaumont
Franklin
Calvert City
Grayling
Sinclair
Texas City
Seadrift
Trenton
Port Arthur
Hutchinson
Laurel
Beaumont
Nikishka
Sheffield
Radford
Warren
Arlington
Port Arthur
Roxana
Port Arthur
Deer Park
Neal
Bogalusa
El Dorado
Narrows
Texarkana
Lamar
Kingsport
tpy
63305
39,417
28,686
27,761
19,265
14,957
13316
13,079
12,927
12,543
11,736
11,058
10,710
10,694
10,588
10429
10362
10,295
9,292
9,215
8,877
8,652
8,211
7,959
7,944
7,638
7,427
7,125
6,854
6,801
6.766
6,704
6,682
6,631
6,617
6255
6,170
6,134
6,057
6,044
5,939
5,877
5,784
5,765
5,722
5,658
5,650
5,426
5,420
5376
yr of data
87
87
87
87
88
88
88
88
88
87
85
85
88
90
88
87
90
87
90
85
88
87
90
85
87
85
88
88
86
88
86
89
87
85
79
88
86
87
85
85
90
88
88
84
87
90
86
85
86
90
Note: numbers in parenthesis indicate ranking in TRJ
27
-------
TABLE 3-9. 50 LARGEST AIRS VOC SOURCES MATCHED AGAINST 50
LARGEST TRI TOTAL ORGANIC SOURCES
AIRS TRI
Ranking Ranking Plant Name
State City
AIRS tpy TRI tpj
7 18 Texas Eastman Co.
9 43 SheU Oil Co.
11 7 Kodak Park Div
15 1 Courtaulds North America
23 20 Air Products and Chemicals
27 10 Union Carbide Corp.
31 3 3M Hutch Mag Media
33 SO Cape Industries
36 12 Reynolds Metals - Cans
47 6 Hoechst Celanese Inc.
SO 2 Tennessee Eastman Co.
TX Longview 13316 2,425
TX Deer Park 12,927 1,443
NY Rochester 11,736 4,010
AL Axis 10,588 21,835
KY CalvertCity 8,211 2390
TX Texas City 7,427 3,831
MN Hutchinson 6,766 12,407
NC Wilmington 6,682 UOO
AL Sheffield 6,255 3,586
VA Narrows 5,650 5,563
TN Kingsport 5376 19,852
28
-------
REFERENCES
1. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Guidance on Emission Statements, Draft,
Research Triangle Park, NC, July 1992.
2. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Emission Inventory Requirements for Ozone State
Implementation Plans, EPA-450/4-91-010, Research Triangle Park, NC, March 1991.
3. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Emission Inventory Requirements for Carbon
Monoxide State Implementation Plans, EPA-450/4-91-011, Research Triangle Park, NC,
March 1991.
4. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Operating Permit Program, 57 Federal Register
32250, Research Triangle Park, NC, July 21, 1992.
5. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, New Source Review Workshop Manual:
Prevention of Significant Deterioration and Nonattainment Area Permitting, Draft,
Research Triangle Park, NC, October 1990.
6. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air
Pollutants for Source Categories: Proposed Regulations Governing Compliance
Extensions for Early Reductions of Hazardous Air Pollutants, 56 Federal Register 27338,
Research Triangle Park, NC, June 13, 1991.
7. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and State and Territorial Air Pollution Program
Administrators/Association of Local Air Pollution Control Officials, NATICH Data Base
Report on State, Local, and EPA Air Toxic Activities, EPA-450/3-91-018, Research
Triangle Park, NC, September 1991.
8. Telecon. Vitas, Jill, TRC Environmental Corporation, with Steven Rapp, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards.
Enhanced monitoring and compliance certification regulations. April 1992.
9. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Enhanced Monitoring and Compliance
Certification Regulations, Draft, Research Triangle Park, NC,
10. Memorandum from Lisa Polyak, U.S. Army Environmental Hygiene Agency, to David
Misenheimer, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, August 20, 1992.
11. Memorandum. Ed Sabo, Pacific Environmental Services to Tom Rosendahl,
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards.
Analysis of Lead Emission Sources. July 19, 1991.
29
-------
Appendix A
A-l
-------
Annual Point Source Update Data Elements
Plant General Level
plant name
street address
city name
zip code
year of emission inventory
UTM zone
UTM easting
UTM northing
plant latitude
plant longitude
primary SIC code
Point General Level
FTPS state code
FIPS county code
plant ID from AFS (or NEDS)
point ID from AFS
hour per day
days per week
hours operated per year
percent throughput - Dec. thru Feb.
percent throughput - March thru May
percent throughput - June thru Aug.
percent throughput - Sept thru Nov.
Stack Level
Stack ID from AFS
stack height
stack diameter
plume height
Segment General Level
SCC number
process rate units
actual annual process rate
fuel content
A-2
-------
SeEment Pollutant Level
primary control device code
secondary control device code
control efficiency
emission limitation description for segment
emission limitation value
emission limitation units
emission estimation method
emission factor
A-3
-------
Point Source Data Elements for Emission Inventory Submittals
Plant General Level
FIPS state code
FIPS county code
year of record for emissions
plant ID from AFS (or NEDS)
plant name
street address
city name
zip code
FIPS city code
plant latitude
plant longitude
UTM zone
UTM easting
UTM northing
primary SIC code
type of inventory
Point General Level
FIPS state code
FTPS county code
plant ID from AFS (or NEDS)
point ID from AFS
hour per day
days per week
hours operated per year
percent throughput - Dec. thru Feb.
percent throughput - March thru May
percent throughput - June thru Aug.
percent throughput - Sept thru Nov.
Stack Level
FIPS state code
FIPS county code
plant ID from AFS (or NEDS)
stack ID from AFS
stack height
stack diameter
plume height
A-4
-------
Segment General Level
FTPS state code
FIPS county code
plant ID from AFS (or NEDS)
point ID from AFS
segment ID from AFS
SCC number
process rate units
actual annual process rate
O3 season process rate (daily)
CO season process rate (daily)
stack ID related to this segment
Segment Pollutant Level
FIPS state code
FIPS county code
plant ID from AFS (or NEDS)
point ID from AFS
segment ID from AFS
pollutant code or CAS code
primary control device code
secondary control device code
control efficiency
SIP regulation in place for segment
compliance year for segment
emission limitation description for segment
emission limitation value
emission limitation units
emission estimation method
emission factor
annual nonbanked emissions (estimated actual)
rule1 effectiveness
O3 season emissions
CO season emissions
A-5
-------
Emission Statement Data Elements
Plant Level
plant name
street address
city name
state name
zip code
mailing address
plant latitude
plant longitude
SIC code
FINDS code
year of emissions
Point Level
percent throughput - Dec. thru Feb.
percent throughput - March thru May
percent throughput - June thru Aug.
percent throughput - Sept thru Nov.
days per week (normal, & typical ozone season day)
hours per day (normal, & typical ozone season day)
hours per year (normal, & typical ozone season day)
Segment Level
actual VOC emissions at process level (tpy & Ibs/day)
actual NOX emissions at process level (tpy & Ibs/day)
emission method code
emission units
SCC for each of the emission estimates
primary control equipment
secondary control equipment
control efficiencies for each piece of equipment
annual fuel process rate or annual throughput
peak O3 season daily process rate
rule effectiveness
A-6
-------
National Allowance Database Data Elements
boiler-generator sequence number
state name
plant name
boiler ID
generator ID
operating utility name
operating utility code
EPA region
county name
DOE ORIS plant code
Phase 1 allowances (tons) from Table A of the CAA
1985 boiler total heat input (1Q12 Btu) from NURF
1985 SO2 emissions (tons) from NURF
boiler SO2 regulatory category
boiler SO2 scrubber flag
1985 boiler SO2 emission limit (Ibs/MMBtu)
1985 SO2 emission limit annualization factor
1985 SO2 emission limit averaging period
1989 generator nameplate capacity (MW)
1989 generator summer net dependable capability (MW)
generator month on-line (first electricity)
generator year on-line (first electricity)
boiler month on-line
boiler year on-line
1985-1987 boiler-generator average total heat input (1012 Btu) from Form 767
consecutive planned and forced outage time during 1985-1987 >=2,920 hours from GADS
primary fuel indicator based on greatest fuel heat share during 1985-1987
1980-1989 gas share (%)
1989 generator full load heat rate (Btu/kWh)
1985 generator generation (GWh)
total capacity of the fossil-steam units operated by the operating utility (MW)
maximum of the average heat inputs for any combination of three consecutive years from
1980-1989 for selected units (1012 Btu)
representative year S02 emission rate (Ibs/MMBtu)
municipally operated flag
1985 boiler S02 emission rate (Ibs/MMBtu)
1985 annualized boiler S02 emission limit (Ibs/MMBtu)
generator heat input at 60 percent capacity (1012 Btu)
boiler-generator share of generator heat input at 60 percent capacity (1012 Btu)
A-7
-------
New Source Review Data Elements
basis for authority
conditional provisions
effective & expiration dates
unit operations covered
identification of emission units
control equipment efficiency
design/operation parameters
equipment design
process specifications
operating/maintenance procedures
emission limits
initial performance test & methods
continuous emission monitoring & methods
surrogate compliance measures
emission limit & averaging time
surrogate measures
malfunctions & upsets
follow-up requirements
recordkeeping & reporting procedures
commence/delay construction
entry & inspections
transfer & severability
post construction monitoring
emissions offset
A-8
-------
NATICH Data Elements
agency name
permitting contact & phone #
permit ID number
facility category
SIC code
year permit issued
last year amended
control equipment
SCC code
pollutant names
CAS number
emission limits
source of emissions
source testing contact & phone #
test ID number
test date
sampling technique & analytical method
emission rates & location of measurement
A-9
-------
Proposed Enhanced Monitoring and Compliance Certification Data Elements
company name
mailing address
street address
contact person & phone number
pollutant
emission source ID
applicable regulation
description of enhanced monitoring system
summary of compliance demonstration
number & duration of deviations
number & duration of periods of undetermined compliance
description of violations & corrective measures taken
number of hours emitting pollutants
number & duration of incidents in which monitoring equipment was
not operated or not producing valid data
estimated total emissions in pounds
calendar period of report
compliance continuous or intermittent
A-10
-------
New Source Performance Standard Data Elements
pollutant
reporting period
emission limitation
address
monitor manufacturer & model #
date of latest CMS certification/audit
process unit(s) description
total source operating time
duration of excess emissions in reporting period due to:
a. start-up/shut-down
b. control equipment problems
c. process problems
d. other known causes
e. unknown causes
total duration of excess emission
[total duration of excess emission] X (100) [total source operating
time]
CMS downtime in reporting period due to:
a. monitor equipment malfunctions
b. non-monitor equipment malfunctions
c. quality assurance calibration
d. other known causes
e. unknown causes
total CMS downtime
[total CMS downtime] X (100) [total source operating time]
description of any changes in CMS (process or controls)
certification that the report is accurate & complete
A-ll
-------
AIRS/AFS Permit Enhancements Data Elements
Key Event Tracking
plant_EPA_id
application_number
permit_number
permit_category
permit_effective_date
permit_expiration_date
permit_event_tracking_code
permit_event_due_date
permit_event_actual_date
partial_application_indicator
signature_recd
signature_date
federal_state_indicator
affected_state_indicator
fee_amount
fee_type
payment_received_date
permit_issues_code
modification_indicator
permit_conditions
Affected State Review
plant_EPA_id
permit_number
application_number
affected_state_l
affected_state_2
affected_state_3
affected_state_4
permit_event_tracking_code
permit_event_due_date
permit_event_actual_date
notices_sent
affected_state_comments_rcvd
A-12
-------
Fee Tracking
Plant Data:
applicationjnumber
permit_number
permitting_authority
plant_EPA_id
plant_state_code
estimated_emissions
fee_amount
application_fee
fee_basis_code
billing_street_address
billing_city_code
billing_state_code
billing_county_code
billing_zip
For each emissions point:
point_id
pollutant_id
estimated_emissions
emission_fee_multiplier
fee_amount
Application and Permit data
Plant data:
application_number
permit_number
permitting_authority
EPA_region
local_region
affected_state_indicator
partial_application_indicator
plant_EPA_id
plant_street_address
plant_city_code
plant_state_code
plant_county_code
plant_zip
permit_contact_person
permit_contact_phone
A-13
-------
responsible_official
responsible_official_phone
govemment_facility_indicator
small_business_indicator
operating_status
fee_amount
fee_type
latitude
longitude
SIC_code
estimated.emissions
For each regulated emissions point:
application_number
permit_number
point_id
point_category
point_description
air_program_code
operating_status
control_equipment_type
control_equipment_id
monitoring_equipment_id
applicable_federal_reqt
applicable_state_reqt
applicable_reqt_exempt
rule_effectiveness_factor
pollutant_id
estimated_emissions
allowable_emissions
averaging_period
emissions_units_of_measure
shut_down_date
stan_up_date
reason_for_shutdown
latitude
longitude
future_effective_requirement
monitoring_frequency
monitoring_requirement
repon_start_date
report_end_date
A-14
-------
For each segment:
application_number
permit_number
point_id
segmented
segment_description
SCC_code
segment_operation_begin_date
segment_operation_end_date
normal_hourly_production_rate
alt_hourly_production_rate
estimated_max_operating_sched
control_equipment_id
applicable_federal_reqt
applicable_state_reqt
estimated_emissions
future_effective_requirement
For each control device:
point_id
control_equipment_id equipment
installation_date
conttol_equipment_type
control_efficiency_design
control_efficiency_actual
For each monitoring device:
poirit_id
monitoring_equipment_id
monitoring_equipment_name
monitoring_type_code
Risk management plan data:
point_id
risk_management_plan
plan_submission_date
plan_description
plan_approval_date
A-15
-------
signature_date
Parent company data:
parcnt_compahy_id
parent_company
parent_company_strcet_address
parent_company_city_code
parent_company_county_code
parent_company_state_code
parent_company_zip
parent_company_contact
parent_company_j>hone
Compliance plan data:
applicable_federal_reqt
acid_rain_comp_plan_indicator
future_effective_requkement
plant_id
point_id
pollutant_id
compliance_sched_event_code
comp_sched_event_due_date
comp_sched_event_actual_date
compliance_status
Compliance certification data:
plant_id
point_id
applicable_federal_reqt
applicable_state_reqt
recordkeeping_reqt
reporting_reqt
work_practice_std_reqt
compliance_sched^event_code
certification_due_date
certification_actual_date
test method id
A-16
-------
Appendix B
B-l
-------
(IMPORTANT: Typ» or print; mid Instructions btfon completing lorn)
FomAfprart OMB Number 20704093
Approval Expim: 11/92
Page 1 of 9
EPA
United States
Envlrenrontil Piw
Agency
TOXIC CHEMICAL RELEASE
INVENTORY REPORTING FORM
ainlawwnaiTIteBlotttw
yPtanning
Suptfftnd
AnMndnMnliindRawtwrtzalknAd
TWFACUTYDNUMIER
WHERE TO SEND
1. EPCRAReporthgCerfcr
COMPLETED FORMS: %%££%£ 200264779
ATThh TOXIC CHEMICAL RELEASE INVENTORY
2. APPROPRIATE STATE OFFICE
(Sot ta&udtom hi AppMdbc F)
IMPORTANT: See Instructions to determine when "Not
Applicable (NA)M boxes should be checked.
Entw-X-heiBlf
this* a revision
PART I. FACILITY IDENTIFICATION INFORMATION
SECTION 1.
REPORTING
YEAR
19
SECTION 2. TRADE SECRET INFORMATION
Are you claiming the toxic chemical identified on page 3 trade secret?
DYes (Answer question 2.2;
DNo (Do not answer 2.2;
Go to Section 3)
If yes in 2.1, is this copy: | | Sanitized | | Unsanitized
SECTION 3. CERTIFICATION (Important: Read and sign after completing all form sections.)
I hereby certify that I have reviewed the attached documents and that, to the best of my knowledge and belief, the
submitted information is true and complete and that the amounts and values in this report are accurate based on
reasonable estimates using data available to the preparers of this report
Signature
SECTION 4. FACILITY IDENTIFICATION
Fadfity of Establishment Nama
TRIFacilily ID Number!
Street Address |
4,1
County ;m \
State
Zip Cod*
Mailing Address frtdfferem from street address) |
Stats
Zip Code |
PUT LABEL HERE
EPA Form 9350-1 (Rev. S/14/92) Previous edtions are obsolete.
B-2
-------
EPA
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
EPA FORM R
PART I. FACILITY IDENTIFICATION
INFORMATION (CONTINUED)
Page 2 of 9
TRI FACILITY ID NUMBER
Te»ie Punic*. CJUgonf.
SECTION 4. FACILITY IDENTIFICATION (Continued)
4.2
4.3
4.4
4.5
4.6
4.7
4.8
4.9
4.10
This report contains information for:
(Important: check only one)
Nan
Technical Contact
Public Conl
SIC Code
(4-digit)
Latitude
and . '-'^
Longitude
Nan
iir»*
a.
;.::;.;'"' Degrees'"? :
le |
18
a. | | An entire facility b. | | Part of a facility
b.
Latitude.
; : Minutes
c.
Seconds
d.
Telephone Number (include area code)
Telephone Number (include area code)
e. f.
:.: :0 V :: . . ; Longitude
Degrees
>
Dun & Bradstreet Number(s) (9 digits)
EPA Identification Number(s) (RCRA I.D. No.)
(12 characters)
Facility NPDES Permit Number(s)
(9 characters)
Underground Injection Well Code (UIC) I.D.
Number(s) (12 digits)
>:;:: Minutes Seconds
a.
b.
a.
b.
a. .
b.
a.
b.
SECTION 5. PARENT COMPANY INFORMATION
5.1
Name of Parent Company
DNA
5.2
Parent Company's Dun & Bradstreet Number
(9 digits)
EPA Form 9350-1 (Rev. S/14,52) Previous edtions are obsolete.
B-3
-------
Pag* 3 ol 9
EPA
United StatM
Environmental Protection
Agoncy
EPA FORM R
PART 11. CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC
INFORMATION
TBIMOUTTO NUMBER
SECTION 1. TOXIC CHEMICAL IDEMTITY
Nan*$npon^E^
piiiia^
<*PCTIOM 2 MIYTI IRP COMPOMPMT mPNTiTY (^portent: DO NOT complete this
SECTION 2. MIXTURE COMPONENT IDENTITY ywMw you complete s^fon , above>
SECTION 3. ACTlVmES AND USES OF THE TOXIC CHEMICAL AT THE FACILITY
(Important; Check all that apply.)
a. I 1 Produce
b. 1 1 Import
If produce or import:
c. fl For on-site use/processing
d. 1 1 For sale/distribution
e. j 1 As a byproduct
f. ( \ As an impurity
a. | 1 As a reactant c. \ 1 As an article component
b. (1 As a formulation component d. \ 1 Repackaging
a. [ I As a chemical processing aid c. I 1 Ancillary or other use
b. f I As a manufacturing aid
SECTION 4. MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF THE TOXIC CHEMICAL ON-SITE AT ANY TIME
DURING THE CALENDAR YEAR
4.1
(Enter two-digit
code
from
instruction
package.)
EPA Form 9350-1 (Rev. 5/14/92) - Previous editions an obsolete.
B-4
-------
Page A of
EPA
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
EPA FORM R
PART II. CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC
INFORMATION (CONTINUED)
mi FACILITY tO NUMBER
Hie ChwncaJ. CMgory, or G«n*rc N«m»
SECTION 5. RELEASES OF THE TOXIC CHEMICAL TO THE ENVIRONMENT ON-SITE
A. Total Release (pounds/
year) (enter range code from
instructions or estimate)
5.1
Fugitive or non-point air
emissions
5.2
5.3
Stack or point air
emissions
DNA
QNA
Discharges to receiving
streams or water bodies
(enter one riam0 per box)
B. Basis of
Estimate
(enter code)
C.%From
Stormwater
5.3.1 Stream or Water Body Name
5.3.2 Stream or Water Body Name
5.3.3 Stream or Water Body Name
5.5
5.5.1
5.5.2
5.5.3
5.5.4
Underground injections
on-site
DNA
Releases to land on-site
Landfill
Land treatment/
application farming
Surface impoundment
Other disposal
NA
DNA
DNA
NA
Check here only if additional Section 5.3 information is provided on page 5 of this form.
EPA Form 9350-1 (Rev. 5/1*92) - Previous editions are cosoiete.
B-5
flange Codes: A «1 10 pouncs: 3»11 J99 pcur.
C = 500 - 995 pcunds.
-------
Page 5 of 9
^ EPA EPAFC
United State* PART II CHEMI
££' INFORMATION
TRI FACUTV O NUV8EB
>RMR
CAI -SPECIFIC Tmio Oh.** C-w. &«.«*««
(CONTINUED)
SECTION 5.3 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON RELEASES OF THE TOXIC CHEMICAL TO THE
ENVIRONMENT ON-SITE
Discharges to receiving ' ^
5.3 , streams or water bodies V ^
\ Center one name per box) -N ^
5.3._ Stream or Water Body Name l£
5.3. Stream or Water Body Name -
~^~ . .- -- : ::: '': .:-- ' -:>: <' -. :.-.*'. ' -
5.3. Stream or Water Body Name
" '" ;..-. -v .y v. . . -.:;-: *' .-
A. Total Release (pounds/ B. Basis of C. %From
year) (enter range code from Estimate Stormwater
instnjctions or estrnate) (enter code)
SECTION 6. TRANSFERS OF THE TOXIC CHEMICAL IN WASTES TO OFF-SITE LOCATIONS
6.1 DISCHARGES TO PUBLICLY OWNED TREATMENT WORKS (POTW)
6.1. A Total Quantity Transferred to POTWs
and Basis of Estimate
6.1 .A.T Total Transfers ((wur^s/year) "
(enter range code or estimate) : *
6.1. B POTW Name and Location Information
POTW Name I
O.l.D. ^^^^^^^
Street Address j
City | County |
State | Zip Code |
6.1. A.2 Basis of Estimate
^ (enter code) - ,':'"::' ''"''
POTW Name
C.1.D.
Street Address : |
City j County ;
State | lip Code
If additional pages of Part II, Sections 5.3 and/or 6.1 are attached, indicate the total number of
pages in this box | [and indicate which Part II, Sections 5.3/6.1 page this is, here.
(example: 1,2,3, etc.)
EPA Form 9350-1 (Rev. 5. u.92) Previous editions are obsolete.
Range Codes: A »1 10 pounds; B = 11 - 499 pounc
C-500-999 pounds.
B-6
-------
Page 6 of 9
wEPA EPA FORM R
iSSSSiMdfa. PART II. CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC
Ejj*^**.*. |NFORMAT|ON (CONTINUED)
TRIFACUTVD NUMBER
SECTION 6.2 TRANSFERS TO OTHER OFF-SITE LOCATIONS
-s^sfs-x,. Off^ite EPA Identification Number (RCRA ID No.)|
Off-Site Location Name*;|
Street Address; «)
.City. -, | CountEPl
State ;,| apGoda;]
A. Total Transfers (pounds/year)
; (enter range code or estimate) ", ..
1.
2.
3.
4. i
Is location under control of reporting i i i i
facaity or parent company? | | Yes | | No
B. Basis of Estimate ; .' \" , -
(enter code) <.- * s '**-*v -
1.
2.
3.
4.
C. Type of Waste Treatment/Disposal
, Recyefing/Energy Recovery (enter code)
1. M
2. M
3. M
4. M
SECTION 6.2 TRANSFERS TO OTHER OFF-SITE LOCATIONS
Off-site EPA IdentificaSon Number (RCRA ID No.)|
Oil-Site Location Name |
Street Address |
City:ii | Countyfel
State | Zip Code i |
!:'t& Total Transfers ^(pounds/year)
;|8 (enter range code or estimate)
1.
2.
3.
4. ,
Is location under control of reporting r j r i
facility or parent company? | | Yes | | No
B. Basis of Estimate . s, ""
(enter code) A * *"
1.
2.
3.
4.
C. Type of Waste Treatment/Disposal/
Recycling/Energy Recovery (enter code)
1. M
2. M
3. M
4. M
If additional pages of Part II, Section 6.2 are attached, indicate the total number of pages in this
and indicate which Part II, Section 6.2 page this is, here. | | (example: 1,2,3, etc.)
box
EPA Form 9350-1 (Rev. 5/1492) Previous editions are obsolete.
Range Codes: A »1 -10 pounds; B «11 499 pounds;
C- 500 -999 pounds.
B-7
-------
Page 7 of 9
EPA
Agency
EPA FORM R
PART II. CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC
INFORMATION (CONTINUED)
TBl FACUTY O NUMBER
TeraC
If additional copies of page 7 are attached, indicate the total number of pages in this
box
and indicate which page 7 this is, here.
(example: 1,2,3, etc.)
EPA Form 9350-1 (Rev. 5/1452) Previous edtions are obsolete.
B-8
-------
EPA
Agency
EPA FORM R
PART II. CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC
INFORMATION (CONTINUED)
Page 8 of 9
TRIFACOJTY C NUMBER
ToricCh.
SECTION 7B. ON-SITE ENERGY RECOVERY PROCESSES
Not Applicable (NA) - Check here If eg. on-site energy recovery Is applied to any waste
stream containing the toxic chemical or chemical category.
Energy Recovery Methods [enter 3-chiracter code(s)]
SECTION 7C. ON-SITE RECYCLING PROCESSES
Not Applicable (NA) - Check here if nfi on-site recycling is applied to any waste
stream containing the toxic chemical or chemical category.
Recycling Method* [inter 3-chertcter eodt(f)]
EPA Form 9350-1 (Rev. 5/U92) Previous edtions are obsolete.
B-9
-------
Page 9 of 9
EPA
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
EPA FORMR
PART II. CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC
INFORMATION (CONTINUED)
TO FACUTY10 NUMBER
Chnneal CMgerr. or Omne N«n»
SECTION 8. SOURCE REDUCTION AND RECYCLING ACTIVITIES
All quantity estimates can be reported
using up to two significant figures.
8.1,
8.2
8.3
8.4
8.5
8.6
8.7
8.8
8:$;y; '
Quantity released *
Quantity used for energy
recovery on-site
Quantity used for energy
recovery off-site
Quantity recycled on-site
Quantity recycled off-site
Quantity treated on-site
Quantity treated off-site
.',:;:. ' -'V ' -. - -V '':
Column A
1990
(pounds/year)
Column B
1991
(pounds/year)
Column C
1992
(pounds/year)
Column D
1993
(pounds/year)
Quantity released to the environment as a result of
remedial actions, catastrophic events, or one-time events
not associated with production processes (pounds/year)
Production ratio or activity
8.10
8.10.1
8.10.2
8.10.3
8.10.4
8.11
index
-
..' -:;.".:-,:- . -- - :"':-, wV.-.-
Did your facility engage in any source reduction activities for this chemical during
the reporting year? If not, enter "N A" in Section 8.1 0.1 and answer Section 8.11.
Source Reduction Activities
[enter code(s)]
Methods
a.
a.
a.
a.
to Identify Activity (enter codes)
b. C.
b. c.
b. c.
b. c.
Is additional optional information on source reduction, recycling, or
pollution control activities included with this report? (Check one box)
YES NO
n
* Report releases pursuant to EPCRA Section 329;3; including "any spilling, leaking, pumping, pouring, emitting, emptying, oscf.argir.g,
injecting, escaping, leaching, dumping, or disposing into the environment.' Do not include any quantity treated on-site or :ff-site.
EPA Form 9350 1 (Rev. 5/14.S2) Previous editions are ocsolete.
B-10
-------
Emission Statement Initial Reporting Form
for New and Modified Sources
I. Plant Level Emission Data
1. Source Identification
Facility Name (up to 40 characters)
Facility Address (up to 30 characters)
Mailing Address (up to 30 characters)
2. Calendar Year of Emissions
3. SIC code(s)
4. Locational Coordinates
Latitude
Longitude
Above data elements all appear on AIRS update screen no. 300
B-ll
-------
Emission Statement Initial Reporting Form
for New and Modified Sources
II. Point Level Emission Data
1. Percentage Annual Throughput:
(AIRS update screen no. 330)
Dec Feb:
Mar - May:
Jun Aug:
Sep Nov:
100%
2. Normal Operating Schedule
(AIRS update screen no. 330)
Hours per Day
Days per Week
Hours per Year
B-12
-------
Emission Statement Initial Reporting Form
for New and Modified Sources
III. Segment Level Emission Data
1. Annual Process Rate
2. Peak Ozone Season Daily Process Rate
(AIRS update screen no. 340) units
3. Pollutant-specific Data
(AIRS update screen no. 340) units
(AIRS update xreen no. 341)
voc
A. Estimated Actual Annual Emissions
Tons per Year
Emissions
Method Code
Emission
Factor
unit
B. Typical Ozone Season Day Emissions
Pounds per Day
Emissions
Method Code
Emission
Factor
unit
C Control Equipment Identification Code
Primary Secondary
D. Control Equipment Efficiency (%)
NOx
A. Estimated Actual Annual Emissions
Tons per Year
Emissions
Method Code
Emission
Factor
unit
B, Typical Ozone Season Day Emissions
Pounds per Day
Emissions
Method Code
Emission
Factor
C Control Equipment Identification Code
Primary Secondary
D. Control Equipment Efficiency (%)
unit
B-13
-------
I Emission Statement Initial Reporting Form
for New and Modified Sources
III. Segment Level Emission Data
Pollutant-specific Data (AIRS update screen no. 341)
Pollutant
A. Estimated Actual Annual Emissions
Tons per Year
Emissions
Method Code
Emission
Factor
unit
B. Typical Ozone Season Day Emissions
Pounds per Day
Emissions
Method Code
Emission
Factor
C Control Equipment Identification Code
Primary Secondary
D. Control Equipment Efficiency (%)
unit
Pollutant
A. Estimated Actual Annual Emissions
Tons per Year
Emissions
Method Code
Emission
Factor
unit
B. Typical Ozone Season Day Emissions
Pounds per Day
Emissions I I
Method Code I I
Emission
Factor
C Control Equipment Identification Code
Primary Secondary
*
D. Control Equipment Efficiency (%)
unit
1 /
-------
TECHNICAL REPORT DATA
tPlease read Instructions on the reverse before completing)
1. REPORT NO. 2.
EPA-454-R-92-002
4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE
Integrated Reporting Issues: Preliminary Fim
7. AUTHOR(S)
9. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS
Emission Inventory Branch
Technical Support Division
Office of Air Quality Planing and Standards
Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
12. SPONSORING AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS
IS. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES
3. RECIPIENT'S ACCESSION NO.
1
5. REPORT DATE
November 1992
31 ngS 6. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE
8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NO.
10. PROGRAM ELEMENT NO.
11. CONTRACT/GRANT NO.
68-D9-0173
13. TYPE OF REPORT AND PERIOD COVERED
14. SPONSORING AGENCY CODE
EIB/TSD/OAQPS
16. ABSTRACT
17. KEY WORDS AND DOCUMENT
a. DESCRIPTORS b.lOENTI
Emissions, Integration, Inventory
i
18. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT 19. SECU
20. SECU
ANALYSIS
FIERS/OPEN ENDED TERMS C. COSATI Field/Group
RITY CLASS (This Report) 21. NO. OF PAGES
68
RITY CLASS (This page) 22. PRICE
EPA Form 2220-1 (R«». 4-77) PREVIOUS COITION is OBSOLETE
------- |