PB83-149328
     Mutagenic  and  Carcinogenic Potency of
     Extracts of Diesel  and  Related
     Environmental  Emissions
     Summary and Discussion  of  the Results
      (U.S.) Health Effects  Research Lab.
     Research Triangle  Park,  NC
     IS 81.
US. fapvfn&ri of Commerce
      Teckrecai Information Service

-------
                                    TECHNICAL REPORT DATA
                             (flene read Insirucr:em on the reverse before complti'
1. REPORT NO.

 FPA-600/J-81-605
JOURNAL  ARTICLE
                                   PB83-1U9328
4. TITtE AND SUBTITLE
 JOURNAL ARTICLE:  Mutagenic and Carcinogenic  Potency of
 Extracts of  Diesel  and Related Environmental  Emissions:
 Summary and  Discussion of the Results
                             5. REPORT DATE
                                1981
                             6. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE
7. AUTHORIS)
                                                             8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NO.
  Stephen ftosnow and Joel "ten Lewtas
9. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS
  Genetic  Toxicology Division
  Health Effects Research Laboratory
  US  Environmental  Protection Agency
  Research Triangle Park, NC  27711
                             to. PROGRAM ELEMENT NO.
                               ACSL1A
                             11. CONTRACT/GRANT NO.
12. SPONSORING AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS
 Office  of Research and Development
 Health  Effects Research Laboratory
 US  Environmental  Protection Agency
 Research  Triangle Park, NC  27711
                                                              13. TYPE OF REPORT AND PERIOD COVERED
                             14. SPONSORING AGENCY CODE
                                EPA-600/11
18. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES
  Environment International 5: 425-429, 1981
16. ABSTRACT
       The proposed conversion from gasoline  powered automobiles to diesel powered
  vehicles has prompted the Environmental  Protection Agency to evaluate the potential
  health  effects  associated with exposure  to  diesel  emissions.  At present, there is no
  direct  epldemiological link between this exposure  and human'health.  Therefore, a
  research program was constructed to compare the health effects associated with diesel
  emissions with  those from other emission sources for which eoidemiological information
  was available.   The emission sources chosen were cigarette smoke, roofing tar, and
  coke  oven.   An  additional comparative emission  source which was evaluated was a
  gasoline catalyst engine.  Respirable particles from a variety of combustion sources
  have  the potential  of being carcinopenic and mutaqenic.  The objective of these
  studies  was  to  determine the relative biological activity of the organic material
  adsorbed on  these particles in both In Vitro mutagenesis and In Vitro and In Vivo
  careinogenesis  bioassays.
17.
                                 KEY WORDS AND DOCUMENT ANALYSIS
                  DESCRIPTORS
               b.IDENTIFIERS/OPEN ENDED TERMS  C.  COSATI Fkld/Gioup
18. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT

  Release to Public
                19. SECURITY CLASS < Thil Report I

                  Unclassified
                                                                            21. NO. OF PAGES
                                                JO. SECURITY CLASS (Tillpigtl
                                                  Unclassified
                                                                            22. PRICE
EPA F«rat 2220-!l (R««. 4-77)   PMCVIOUS RDITION II O«»OUKTC

-------
Emironmcnl Inferrmnvtiul, Vol. 5. pp. 425-429. 1981
Printed in ibc USA.
                          0160-4120/RI /049425-05S02.00/0
                                 1982 Pergamon Press Ltd.
                                                                                      EPA-600/J-81-605
                                                                                       JOURNAL  ARTICLE
MUTAGENIC AND CARCINOGENIC POTENCY
OF EXTRACTS OF DIESEL AND  RELATED
ENVIRONMENTAL EMISSIONS:
SUMMARY AND  DISCUSSION  OF THE RESULTS
Stephen Mesnow and Joellen Leyvtas     .      .'....".
Ht.'lth Effects Research Laboratory. US Environmental Protectioo Agency. Research Triangle Park.
Noun Carolna 27711. USA                 .      .
UK proposed conversion from gasoline powered automobiles todicsel powered vehicles has prompted the
Environmental Protection Agency to evaluate the potential health effects asstviatcd with exposure to.
diesel emissions, At present, there is no direct cpidcnliological link between this exposure an.) human
health. Therefore, a research program was constructed to compare the health effects associated with dicscl
emissions with those from other emivsion sources for which cpidcmiological information was available.
The emission sources chosen were cigarette smoke, roofing tar. and coke oven. An additional comparative
emission vturcc which was evaluated was a gasoline catalyst engine. Rcspirabb particles (rom a variety of
combustion >ourccs have the potential of being carcinogenic and mntagcnic. The objective of these studies
was to determine the relative biological activity of the organic material adsorbed »n these particles in both
1/1 mm mui.igcncsis and in ii/ro and m riro carcmogcnesis hioaxsays. The  organic extracts from the
following series of emission sources  were quantitatively  hi«a.ss£>cd in a  matrix of tests for  their
carcinogenic and mutagcnic activity: (1) a light-duly Oldsmobilc dicscl 3M) engine:  hinturiufn; miloiic recombination
in .Vu<-e Ivmphoma cells. Balb/c 3T3 mouse embryo
fibroblasls aind C'HO cells: viral enhancement of SHI: cells: oncogcnic transformation in .Balb/c 3T3
cells: and skin tumor initiation in SLNC'AR and CS7 black  mice.  The results of this lest mains arc
discussed.
Introduction

The propo'sed conversion from  gasoline powered aulo-
mobilcs  to  diescl powered vehicles has  prompted ih;
Environmcnial Protection Agency to evaluate the poten-
tial  health  effects  associated with  exposure to  dicsel
emissions i( Ember.  1979). At present, there is no  direct
epidemiologica! link between  this exposure and human
health (EPA,  1978). Therefore, a research program was
c::n.strucle<.  to  compare the  health  effects associated
with  -liescl  emissions with the ; from  other  emission
sou.-sX-!;  for which epidemiological information was
avail itric. The emission sources chosen  were  cigarette
smoke, roofing tar. and coke oven. An additional com-
parative  emission source which was  evaluated  was  a
gasc'.ine  iitalyst vehicle.           -          •• .   •-
   Respi.:aMe particles  from  a variety  of combustion
sources  har:  the potential of being carcinogenic and
mutagenic (Waters el at., 1979). The objective of these
studies was  to determine the relative biological activity
of the organic  material  adsorbed on these particles in
both in vitro and in vivo  mutagenesis and carcinogenesis
bioassays. The organic extracts from the following series
of emission  sources were quantitatively bioassayed in a
matrix of tests for their carcinogenic  and mutagcnic
activity:  (1) a light-duty  Oldsmobile dicscl 350 engine,
(2) a heavy-duty  Caterpillar 3304 diesel engine. (3) a
light-duty Datsun Nissan 220C engine, (4) a Volksw-a-
gen  lurbocharged  Rabbit diesel  engine.  (5)  cigarette
smoke, (6) roofing tar, (7)  coke oven, and (8) an  un-
leaded gasoline catalyst Mustang  II. The collection,
characterization, and description  of  these  samples arc
described by Lcwtas el at. (1981).
   The test matrix consisted of the following bioassays:
reverse  mutation  in  Salmonella  typhimurium; mitotic
recombination   in  Saccharomyces  cerevisiae',   DNA
                                                      425

-------
426
breakage in Syrian hamster embryo cells (SHE); sister
chromatid exchange  in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO)
cells; gene mutation in L5178Y mouse lymphoma cells.
Balb/c 3T3 mouse embryo fibroblasts. and CHO cells;
viral enhancement in SHE cells; oncogenic transforma-
tion in Balb/c 3T3 cells; and skin  turner initiation in
SENCAR and C57 black mice.
   The potency of complex mixtures of organic com-
pounds in biological systems will depend on the uptake,
distribution, metabolism, and binding of each compo-
nent of the mixture in each biological system; the specific
biological endpo'it (e.g.. gene mutation): the sensitivity
of each biological system to the individual components
of the  mixture; the possible interactions, both synergis-
tic  and antagonistic, which arise from the exposure to
multiple  agents; and  the type of quantitative method
which is applied to the data. Differences in these param-
eters will result in altered potency.   •
   Aware of these problems and shortcomings, we have
attempted  to  correlate  biological end  effects from  a
variety of carcinogenesis and mutagencsis bioassays with
the nature or source of a series of combustion samples.
The: purpose of this comparative study is.to  evaluate
each of the in vitro bioassay systems  in comparison with
each other and with the in  vivo system. This paper will
summarize  and discuss the results of the bioassays re-
ported in the session on the Mutagenic and Carcino-
genic Potency of Extracts  of  Diesel and  Related  En-
vironmental Emissions (Claxton, 1981;  Mitchell ei al.,
1981; Casto el al.. 1981; Curren et al.. 1981; Slaga el al..
1981).


Results and Discussion

Quaniitaiion method
General procedures. The method for  relating effect with
dose depends on the bioassay being considered.  The
bacterial  mutation system of Ames  (AMES), the sister
chromatid exchange bioassay in Chinese hamster ovary
cells (SCE), the mammalian cell mutagencsis bioassay in
L5178Y mouse lymphoma cells, (L5178Y) and the mouse
skin lumor  initiation bioassay (TUMOR INITIAT) gave
good dose-response relationships and the slope of the
linear portion of the dose response curve, was chosen for
potency estimation (Table 1). The Balb/c 3T3 mutagen-
csis and  oncogenic transformation  -;ioassays  (BALB)
did not give good dose response with the samples tested
and closes chosen. A quantitatipn method .was therefore
applied which utilized the lowest effective concentration
te- ted (LF.CT) which exerted a biological response.  It is
to be emphasized* however, that with pure agents  and
more closely spaced doses the Balb assay does respond
in a dose-related fashion. The viral enhancement bioas-
say  in Syrian hamster  embryo  cells  (VIRAL EN-
HANCE) gave dose  related response  information in
terms of  absolute frequency but for comparison to the
                         Stephen Nonowand Joellen Leu. las

      Table I. Comparative potency: Quamitation method.
               Mulagene&is
CarcinogcnCMs
                                VIRAL         TUMOR
 Bioassoys: AMES SCK  L5PSY  BALB ENHANCE BALB  INITIAT
. Quanli-
 lalion
 Mcihnl:   Slope  Slop*   Slope  LECT   LECT   LF.CI   Slope

LECT= Lowest effective concentration tested.
Slope Aslope of the linear portion of the dose-response curve.
Balb system and due to the kind of statistics applied to
the assay, the LECT method was chosen. It  is possible
that the two methods, slope and LECT. when applied to
the same data could give dissimilar relative rankings.
Bioassay  results  in Saccharomyces  cerevisiae.  DNA
damage in SHE cells, gene mutation in CHO cells, and
skin tumor initiation in C57 black mice were not utilized
in this analysis due to marginal resu'.'.s.
Nornia/i:ation of Jala.  In order to reduce or normalize
the potencies in the bioassays to a common denomina-
tor, the following system was applied: the activity of the
Nissan diesel sample  regardless of  bioassay  type or
quanlilalion method used was given a value of 100. All
the results of other emission samples were then related
to the Nissan  sample. For example, in the Ames bioas-
say. Strain TA-98 less metabolic activation, the potency
of Nissan and Oldsmot'Ic  by the slope.method  was
1225 and 615 revcrtants/ lOO fig. respectively. Assuming
the Nissan potency equals 100 by simple mathematical
relationship, the Oldsmobile sample equals 50 or one-half
the potency of the Nissan sample. In the case of a LECT
potency,  the inverse relationship is applied. For example
if the LECT for Nissan is 75 /»g/ml and that for Cat is
300 jtg/ml. assuming Nissan equals 100. then Cat equals
75/300 X 100  or  25, one-quarter  the  potency of the
Nissan sample. Using this kind of analysis, the absolute
data was converted to normalized values. The reason the
Nissan was chosen as  the sample to normalize to  was
that it was the only diesel sample tested in all bioassays
which gave positive results.

Comparative rankings
Gene mutation assays. A comparison of the test results of
the eight samples plus  the positive control in the three
gene mutation assays is found in Table 2. The three j;ene
mutation assays compared  were Ames strain TA-V8.
L5178Y  at the TK*'~ locus,  and BALB 3T3  at the
ATPase  locus. Each  system was performed  without
(-MA)  and  with  ( + MA) metabolic activation  which
consisted of an Aroclor-1254 induced  rat hepatic.S-9.
The emission samples were previously described and are
abbreviated as Cat for heavy duty Caterpillar; Nissan;
Olds  for  Oldsmobile 350;   VW  Rabbit  for  the
lurbocharged diesel Rabbit;-Mustang for the unleaded
catalyst gasoline engine; cigarette for standard cigarette
smoke condensate; coke for coke oven emissions; Roof

-------
i Diesel and related environmental emissions
                                                  427
      • Table 2: Comparative rankings: dene mutation assays.
       Table 3. Comparative rankings: DNA damage assay.
AMES'
Sample
Diesel:



Gasoline:
Comparative
Sources:


Standards:


Cat
Nissan
Olds
VWRab
Mustang

Cigarette
Coke
Roof Tar

B( Olds > Rabbit>
  Cat. When the gasoline sample is included, the rankings
  are:  Ames:   Nissan > Olds> Rabbit > Mustang> Cat;
  mouse  lymphoma:  Nissan>Olds>Mustang>Rabbit>
  Cat. Both of these cell types lack the oxidalive enzymes
  required for the activation of  mutagens or carcinogens.
  The diesel  and gasoline samples show primarily direct
  acting  activity. Balb 3T3  cells possess the en/yincs re-
  auired  for the activation of carcinogens especially poly-
  cyclic aromatics (Curren el al.. 1981) and therefore one
  cannot compare all these  systems across the  board and
  expect  similar results.  Comparison of the thr-x systems
  with metabolic activation  showed the relative ranking
  (with some exceptions) to be: Nissan > Olds> Rabbit  >
  Cat.
    The comparative sources samples generally show more
  metabolic activation dependence for maximal effect and
  less quantitative correlation in the gene mutation assays.
  DNA damage assay. The  mobile source  samples tested
  for  sister cliromatid  exchange in CHO  cells, without
  activation. (Table 3) gave  the following ranking: Nissan
  > Rabbit, Musiang>Ca:, Olds.
    In  the presence of metabolic activation, the SCE
  results with the comparative sources ranked in similar
  order with  the mouse lymphoma  results:  roof tar>cokc
  > cigarette.
  Onnigenic transformation. The results from assays which
  relate to the transformation of cells in culture are found
  in Table 4. Both of ihese sysierns were evaluated  by the
SCE(CHO)'
Sample
Diesel:



Gasoline:
Comparative
Sources:

Standards:
-• •
Cat
Nissan
OUs
VW Rah
Mustang.
Cigarette
Coke
Roof Tar
B Rabbit, Mustang* Cat, Olds, while  the
comparative samples rank: roof tar > coke > cigarette.
Mouse skin tumnrigencsix. The  results .obtained  in  the
SENCAR mouse skin tumorigenesis experiments  for
tumor initiators have  been compared at  14 weeks after
treatment (interim score) for all  the  samples and at  21
  Table 4. Comparative ranking..-.: Oncogenic• transformation assays.
Viral
Sample Enhancement (Sill
. Diesel:



Gasoline:
Comparative
Sources:


Standards:

Cat
Nissan
Olds
VW Rab
Mustang

Cigarette
Coke
Roof Tar
1»(U)P
MNNCi
0
100
0
50
50

•;'200
KOO
1040
50000 '
31150
BALB3T3
E( -MA
1.3
100
1.9
NTh
100

r
10
i
—
HOO
J-MA"
0
100
0
NT
2000

1
I
500
16700
—
 '"Metabolic activation by an Artvlor-1254 induced rat hepatic S-*
 *Noi tested.
 * Testing incomplete at thix time.

-------
42R
                          Stephen Nc-jnow and Jocllcn Lc»las
Table 5.-. Comparative rankings: SENCAR mouse skin tuniurigcncsis.
Tumor Initiation
Interim Score' Final Score
Sample
Diesel:
(iasolinc:
Comparative
Souices:
Standards:

Cat
Ni.ssan
Olds
VW Rah
Mustang
Cigarette
Coke
Roof Tar
B(o>P
Ranking
0
MX)
45
35
0
71
17900
Potency h 'Potency1"-'
0.00 0.00
0.25X
0.115 0.145
I
(MWO
000
O..W
0.182
46.2 71.6
                                                                 Table 7. Relative rankings of mobile source .samples.
                                                                Bioassav
                                                                                         Rank Order
•"Interim score 1.4, weeks after treatment.
hPapillomx\/mouNe/nig.,    -•
'Testing incomplete at this lime.
week?, of treatment (final score) for .three samples (Table
5). The  interim score is represented here in both  abso-
lute ti.-rms (papillomas/mouse/mg) and in the normal-
ized rankings while the final scoring for comparison is
in absolute terms. There are, as expected, differences in
the  slope  potencies  from   incomplete vs  completed
experiments hut those differences do not exceed 2-fold
in the Olds and K(a)P samples.  The Cat and cigarette
samples were negative in this assay  system up to 10.000
jig/mouse. The lack of activity of the cigarette smoke
condensate may be due in part to the method  of sample
collection.  This sample is  not  an  organic  extract  of
particles as are the other samples and is therefore com-
paratively much less concentrated. This may explain the
very  low percentage  of benzofujpyrene found  in  the
cigarette smoke condensate sample  (Table 6).  The Olds.
     Table 6. Correlation between organics anJ tumor initiation.
                                            Mouse Skin
                     Percent Organic  ng B( a IP/   Tumot
                       lixtractablc     mg k\t.   Initiation'*
Diesel:


Gasoline:
Comparative
Sources:

Standards:
Cat
Nissan
Olds
VWRab
Mustang
Cigarette
Coke
Roof Tar
U99
-
2
1173
2
26
103
. 478
KH9
10*
0.00
0.25S
0.115
I"
0.09
0.00
0.307
O.IK2
46,2
                                                            AMIS'
                                                            L5I78V
                                                            S0:.'   .
                                                            Viral Ilnharicemeht'
                                                            Tumor Initiation1' •
                      Nissan > Mustang. Olds. Rabbit » Cat
                      Nissan > Olds > Rabbit > Mustang
                      Nissan > Rabbit * Cat. Olds
                      Nissan > Mustang. Rabbit '*• Cat. Olds
                      Nissan > Olds > Mustang > Cat
                                                          'In the presence of an Aroelor-1254 induced rat hepatic S-^.  :
                                                          ""Mouse skin tumor initiation in SF.N'CAR'inice 14 weeks after treat-
 Mustang, and roofing tar activities were less than Nis-
 san while the coke oven sample was slightly higher. The
 ranking of the mobile source samples was: .Nisw.r»>-
 Olds > Mustang * Cat.
    A comparison  of the amount of B(u)P per milligram
 extract, and the potencies of those samples.as. skin tumor.
 initiators is found in  Table 6. There is little correlation
 observed,  except  for the  Olds  sample.'.between  ng
 B(a)IJ/mg extract and papillomas/riiouse/mg extract.
                              , .             «      • •- •
 Comparison across ten systems              • •  •
  ..The relative rankings of the mobile source samples
 are listed in  Table  7. These results are  from  those
 bioassays  performed  in  the  presence  of exogenous
 metabolic activation.
    There is a consistency in these results with the Nissan
 sample  the most  potent and  the  Cat sample the least
 potent in all hioassays.               .  .
    The relative rankings of the comparative source sam-
 ples is found  in Table R. In  three of five  systems, the
 identical rank order of  roof tar>coke>cigarette  is
 found, and in all  five systems, the cigarette sample was
 the least potent.
    The  normalized rankings  for 7 bioassays, are com-
 pared in Table 9. The results presented are from those
 bioassays performed  in.  the presence of  exogenous
 metabolic activation including Ames, SCE. L5178Y. and
 Balb-mutagcnesis and transformation. The quantitative
 results from the mobile source samples show a general
 overall consistency! Cut, a very weak sample in Ames is
 inactive in SCE,  viral enhancement,  Balb transforma-
 tion, and mouse  skin tumor initiation. Olds, weak,  in
 Ames. L5178Y. Balb mutation, and  mouse skin  tumor
 initiation  is inactive in  SCE, viral enhancement,  and
 BALB transformation. In three of the four  assays for

      Table R. Relative rankings of comparative source samples.
                                                                  Bioassav
                                                                                            Rank Older
                                                              AMI-S*
                                                              L5I7KV
                                                              SCU"
                                                              Viral linhancemenl
                                                              Tumor Initiation*1
                            Coke > Roof Tar. Cigarette
                            Roof Tar > Coke > Cigarette
                            Roof Tar > Coke * Cigarette
                            Root Tar > Coke > Cigarette
                            Coke > Roof Tar > Cigarette
 'Interim '.ore 14 weeks after treatment (papillomas/mouse/mg).
 'Testi'.'s incomplete at this lime.
 •In the presence of an Aroclor-1254 induced rat hepatic S-9.
. *"Mou.se .skin tumor initiation in SliNCAR mice 14 weeks after treat-
 ment.           ...

-------
* Diesel anij related environmental emissions
                                                                                                                      429
                                            Table 9. Comparative potency rankings.
                                                   Mutagenesis
                                                    Carcinogenesis
                                                                            VIRAL             TUMOR
                                        AMES'  SCE'   L-5I78Y'   BALB'   ENHANCf   BALB'   INITIAT"
Diesel:



Cat
Nissan
Olds
VWRab
4.3
100
23
22
0
100
0
50
lc
100
64
50
15
100
58
NT"
0
100
0
$0
0
100
0
NT
0
too
45
I
                 Gasoline:
                 Comparative
Mustang     25
                                                                    7500
                                                                                50
                *ln the presence of an Aroclor-1254 induced rat hepatic S-9.
                'Mouse skin-tumor initiation in SUNCAR mice after 14 weeks of treatment.
                'Testing incomplete at ihis lime.            	
                JNol tested.
                                                                                         2000
                                                                                                     35
Sources:


Standards:
Cigarette
Coke
Roof Tar
Wall"
7
IK
7
1112
0
44
291
1750
21
339
850
189
300
15
7500
25.000
200
XOO
1040
50.000
I
1
500
16.700
0
119
71
17.900
  which  test data is available.  SCE; L5I78Y. and viral
  enhancement, the  Rabbit  sample gave almost identical
  quantitative  results. The Mustang sample gave similar
  results in Ames. L5I78Y,  and mouse  skin tumor initia-
  tion, while markedly dissimilar results were obtained in
  the Balb assay.
     With  the  comparative source  samples,  there- is little
  agreement between  the  quantitative results  from  these
  bioassays with the exception of the roofing tar sample in
  L5I78Y. viral enhancement and Balb  transformation.
     In  theory, gene mutation and skin tumor initiation
  arise from similar one  hit. single process,  irreversible
  mechanisms  and should give similar results Assuming
  equal  toxicity   and  mutageri/carcinogen  transport/
  activation by the various cell types. A comparison of the
  results of the  mobile  source samples  in  Ames  and
  LSI78Y  gene mutation with those results in  mouse skin
  tumor  initiation seem  to support  this hypothesis.
     In  conclusion,  a  series  of  extracts from diesel and
  gasoline  emission samples  were evaluated in a battery of
  bioassays and  a  broad general  agreement was found
  among most of the bioassays. Similar experimentation
 . with.the cigarette, coke oven, and  roofing tar  samples.
  produced dissimilar results. Additional experimentation
  and  analysis will  continue in this .important  area  of
  environmental mutagencsis and carctnogenesis.
                                  References

                                  Casht. B. O.. Hatch. Ci. G.. Huang. S. I... Lewlas...!. I... Nesnow. S,.
                                     and Waters. M. I). (19XU Mulaiynic and carcinogenic potency of
                                     extracts of diesel anj related  environmental emissions:  In turn
                                     mulagcncsis and oncogcnic transformation. Kminm. int. 5. 403.
                                  Claxlon. L. (l9S|j Muiagcnic and carcinogenic potency of extracts of
                                     diesel and related environmental emissions: Salmonella typltitriurtum
                                     assay. Knriron. lit: 5. 3X9..                  •
                                  Curren. R. I).  Schechtrr.an.  L. .M.. Kim. C, M.. and .Kouri. R. II.
                                     (19X1)  Mulagcnic and carcinogenic potency of extracts of diesel
                                     and related environmental emissions: Simultaneous transformation
                                    • and mulagenesis in HALH/c 3T3 cells. £m'ir/w. Int. 5. 411.  .
                                  Ember. L. i'979) T\tt diex-l  dilemma: HPA's difficult decision. Km-
                                     rinv.^u.-i 21.  15-41.
                                  Environmental  Protection  Agency (I97X) Health ei'fecls  associated
                                     with diesel exhaust emissions: Literature review and evaluation.
                                     T.I'A 6tX)/l-7S-«K;3.."U. S. Umironricnlal Protection Agency, R'.':
                                     search  Triangle Park. NC.  ...      ..-.
                                  Lewtas. j. <•/ al. t!98l).Mulagenic and carcinogenic potency o:  ex-
                                     tracts of diesel and related environmental emissions: Study design.
                                     sample generation, colle.-tion.  and  preparation. Enrintn. Int. 5.
                                     3S3.'
                                  Mitchell. A. IX Simmon. V. r.. Morlelmans. K. E.. Riccio. E. S.. Jolz.
                                  -   M. M.. and  Evans.  E. L. (19X1)  Mutagenic and  carcinogenic.
                                     potency of extracts of diesel and related  environmental emissions:
                                     In twu mutagcnesis aniMJNA damage. Knrmm. Inf. 5. *93.
                                  Slaga. T. J.. Tripled',  L. L. and Nesnow. S. (19X1)  Mutagenic and
                                     carcinogenic potency of extracts of diesel and related environmen-
                                     tal emissions: Two stage carcinogcitesis in skin tu.^ior sensitive
                                     mice (SENCAR)./:»M ir..n./n/. 5. 417.
                                  Waters. M. D. Nesnow.  S.. lluisingh. J. L.. Sandhu. S.  S..  and
                                     Claxt(tn, L. eds. (1979)  Applti'aiit'n »/ Short- Term Huta.\\ays in lite
                                     Frai'tttmuli'tn uihl Analysts of  Cttniptex  Knrirtaint.'nial Mi.\lurr\.
                                     Plenum Press. NY.

-------

-------