EPA-AA-TEB-511-80-1
                    EPA Evaluation  of  the  "Auto-Miser" Device

This document contains several pages which may not reproduce well.  Any questions
concerning the legibility of these pages should be directed to:  Merrill W. Korth,
Emission Control Technology Division,  Office of Mobile Source Air Pollution
Control, Environmental Protection Agency,  2565 Plymouth Road, Ann Arbor, MI 48105,
(313) 668-4299 or FTS 374-8299.
                                       By

                               Thomas J.  Penninga
                                 February 1980
                           Test and Evaluation Branch
                      Emission Control  Technology Division
                  Office of Mobile  Source Air Pollution Control
                      U.S.  Environmental Protection Agency

-------
                       Billing Code 6560-01









                 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY






                        [40 CFR Part 610]






                             —-- '      ]
                   FUEL ECONOMY RETROFIT DEVICES









           Announcement of Fuel Economy Retrofit Evaluation




                     '  for the "Auto Miser"






AGENCY ;  Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)






ACTION;  Notice of Retrofit Device Evaluation






SUMMARY ;  This  document  announces the conclusions of the  EPA evalua-




tion of  the "Auto Miser"  under  the provisions of Section 511 of the




Motor Vehicle Information and Cost Savings Act.






FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT;   F.  Peter  Hutchins,  Emission Control




Technology  Division,  Office of Mobile  Source Air Pollution Control,




Environmental  Protection Agency,  2565 Plymouth Road,  Ann  Arbor,




Michigan 48105,  313-668-4340.






BACKGROUND INFORMATION;  Section  511 (b) of  the Motor  Vehicle Informa-




tion and Cost Savings Act (15 U.S.C. 2011 (b))  requires that:

-------
     (b) (1)  Upon  application  of any  manufacturer of  a retrofit
     device  or  prototype  thereof,  upon the  request of  the  Federal
     Trade Commission  pursuant  to  subsection (a),  or  upon his  own
     motion,  the  EPA  Administrator shall  evaluate  in accordance
     with rules prescribed under  subsection  (d),  any retrofit  device
     to  determine  whether the  device  increases  fuel economy and  to
     determine whether the representations  (if any)  made with  respect
     to such retrofit devices  are  accurate.

     (c) The EPA Administrator shall publish in the Federal Register a
     summary of "the results" "of 'a'll tests conducted under this section,
     together with the  EPA Administrator's conclusions as to:

          (1)   the effect of any retrofit  device  on  fuel economy

          (2)   the effect of any such  device on emissions  of air
              pollutants;  and

          (3) any other  information which the Administrator
              determines  to be  relevant  in evaluation  such de-
              vice.
EPA published final regulations establishing procedures for conducting

fuel  economy  device evaluations  on March  23,  1979  [44  FR  17946] .


ORIGIN OF REQUEST FOR EVALUATION;  On August 16,  1979 the EPA received

a request from Auto-Miser International Manufacturing  Corporation for

evaluation  of a  fuel  saving  device termed  the "Auto-Miser."  An

evaluation has been made  and the results are described  completely in a

report entitled:   EPA Evaluation  of  "Auto  Miser"  Under  Section  511 of

the Motor Vehicle  Information  and Cost  Savings  Act.  Copies of this

report are available upon request.

-------
SUMMARY OF EVALUATION;    The basic  conclusion  following  review  of
the  testing  performed  by  independent  laboratories  and  by Brigham
Young University is that the "Auto Miser" reduces CO emissions by 12 -
40 percent, but does not improve fuel economy.  The other  constituents
in  the  exhaust, HC  and NOx  were not  affected  by the  device.   The
fuel economy  results  were  the same with and without the  "Auto Miser"
installed for  testing performed according to the Federal Test Proce-
dure and Highway Fuel Economy Tests.   While specific numerical fuel-
saving claims are not made  in the  application, several references are
made naming the "Auto-Miser^-'-ss- A "fuel saving  system."  The  test data
do  not  substantiate the  "fuel saving" capabilities of  the  "Auto
Miser."
Date                                 David G. Hawkins
                                     Assistant Administrator
                                     for Air, Noise,  and Radiation

-------
                    EPA Evaluation of ."Auco-Miser" Under
    Section 5il  of  the Motor  Vehicle  Information  and Cost Savings  Act
The following  report  summarizes  the  information  on the device  as sup-
plied by  the applicant and  then presents the  EPA evaluation  results.

     1.    Marketing Identification of  the Device:   Auto-Miser

     2.    Inventor of  the Device and Patents:   Puindail U. Johnson, U.S.
          Patent applied  for;  serial  No.  21259,  filed March  16,  1979.

     3.    Manufacturer of the. DC. vicer    Auto-Miser ^International  Manu-
          facturing Corporation^  ~ ~ "

     4.    Manufacturing Organizations  Principals;

          John H. O'Neil, Jr.       Chairman  of  the Board
          Randall W. Johnson        President

     5.    Marketing Organization in U.S. Making  Applications;

          Auto—Miser International Manufacturing Corporation
          2570 Gravel Street
          Fort Worth,  TX   76118

     6.    Identity of Applicant:

          John O'Neil, Jr. and Randall W. Johnson

     7.    Description of the Device:   (As supplied by the  applicant):

          The  system  is designed to  provide this  (fuel/air)  vaporized
          mixture in parallel to  the normal carburetor in a conventional
          fuel  induction  system (not  fuel injected) of a  spark ignition
          engine.  Physically,  the vapor mixture is introduced below the
          carburetor  at the connection  of the existing  crankcase ven-
          tilating system to the  intake manifold.

          The  vacuua  at the PCV  connection is the operational force for
          the  system.   This vacuum draws fuel and air into a vaporizing
          chamber  wherein the  fuel is vaporized  by and  nixed  with in-
          coming filtered air.   The  amount  of vacuum  taken to operate
          the  system  is limited  so as not to adversely affect PCV valve
          operation or  other vacuum control requirements.

-------
     The amount of  fuel  vaporized  is determined by  (1)  the amount
     of fuel in the cannister which is controlled by a float valve,
     (2) the  vacuum in  the  cannister which  is limited by an air
     inlet  control adjusting  screw,  and  (3)  the amount of  air flow
     into the  cannister  which  is  limited by a  flow control screw
     and is  a function of engine vacuum.

     A  secondary  function of this  system is to mix the vaporized
     fuel/'air with  the vapors  passing  from the  crankcase through
     the PCV- system.   This  mixing  enhances the  combustibility of
     the crankcase  vapors"""which in  turn contributes  to  the  re-
     duction in combustion chamber  deposits.

     Further, the  introduction  of  this vaporized  fuel/air results
     in  reduced  throttle opening  at  a  given  operating  condition
     reducing the amount  of  fuel taken into the carburetor.

     A  more complete  description  can  be  found  in Attachment A.

8.    Claimed Applicability of the Device;

     Certain general prerequisites must be met for installation of
     the device which defines applicability.

     a.   Vehicle must be equipped with a Positive  Crankcase Ven-
          tilation (PCV Valve) System.

     b.   Vehicle must have  a carburetor  fuel  system.   Not appli-
          cable to fuel injection fuel supply engine.

     c.   Vehicle must be equipped  with engine mounted fuel pump to
          permit fuel  supply to device  from suction  side of fuel
          pump.

9.    Device  Installation, Tools  Required,  Expertise Required
     (claimed);

     See Attachment B

10.  Device  Maintenance (claimed);

     Maintenance procedures  for  the  system include changing of the
     fuel filter  and  cleaning   the  air  intake filter  on  an  "as
     needed"  basis  to  assure  continuing  correct  operation.   The
     following procedure is  used.

     a.   Fuel Filter:   The  fuel filter has  a  translucent housing
          to  indicate  fuel  flow and  dirt  accumulation.   When flow
          is  restricted  as  determined  by visual  observation,  the

-------
          filter is  changed by  removing the  filter  from the fuel
          supply hose  and replacing.   Two  spring  type  clamps are
          loosened to permit  replacement.   Tool required:  pliers.

     b.   Air  Inlet  Filter:   Outside  air  taken  from  the  engine
          compartment is  used to vaporize  the gasoline.  This air
          is  filtered  through a  porous poly-urethane  filter ele-
          ment.  When  visual  inspection shows  dirt  accumulation,
          the filter is removed for cleaning.  A screw retained cap
          is removed to permit  the filter element  to  be taken off
          the  unit  for cleaning  and replacement.  Tool required:
          cross recess screw driver.

11.  Effect on Vehicle Emission (non-regulated) (claimed);

     The product provides a mixture of  air  and vaporized gasoline
     to  the vehicle  intake  manifold  via  the positive crankcase
     ventilating  system.    No  additives  are   used  in the  system.
     Therefore,  only  the normally  controlled pollutants  (hydro-
     carbons,  carbon  monoxide and oxides of  nitrogen)  are emitted
     into the ambient air.

12.  Safety of the Device (claimed);

     Every effort during  the  development and  testing of the system
     covered in this application has been directed toward assuring
     safe operation.  The entire system operates under a vacuum so
     any leakage  is  inward.   The design has been directed toward
     meeting  the  Motor  Vehicle  Safety  Standard  No.  301-75   (Fuel
     System Integrity).

     Further safety considerations  include  the spring loaded anti-
     backfire  valve,  use of  hoses meeting SAE and MIL  fuel hose
     specifications,  materials unaffected by  contact  with fuel and
     which will withstand the operating temperatures.

     Malfunction of the  system will reduce drivability as shown in
     tests presented with this application but not to the extent of
     a safety hazard.

13.  Emission and Fuel Economy Results Reported by the Applicant;

     a.   Brigham  Young  University   Engine   Dynamometer  testing
          simulated urban driving cycle  (see Attachment C).

     b.   Summary   of    Urban/Highway    Driving   Comparison   (see
          Attachment D).

-------
     c.    Test: report,  EG&G  Automotive  Research Inc.,  covering, test
          conducted between  June  9,  1979 and July  7, 1979.

14.   Information Gathered by EPA

     a.    Telephone  contact  with   Dr.  Germane  of  Brighata  Young
          University to  discuss  testing  methods, procedures,  and
          results*

     b.    Attempted  telephonic   confirmation   of   urban/highway
          driving comparison data.

     c.    Telephonic —contact"--with  EG&G  to  determine . valid  and
          invalid test  on Chevetta.

15.   Analysis

     a.    Installation:  As noted in Attachment B,  installation by
          other  than authorized Auto-Miser  dealer is not  recom-
          mended.    The   installation  instructions   seen   quite
          straightforward.  The system adjustments  require  a cali-
          brated  HC/CO  meter  and   a   calibrated  vacuum  garage.
          Installers unfamiliar with the  Auto-Miser could run into
          trouble with the  adjustments but  there appears to  be no
          real  problems  with the  installation  procedures.   The
          Auto-Miser warranty only  applies to  units  installed by
         .authorized Auto-Miser.installation agents.

     b.    Maintenance:   The application is unclear whether the fuel
          drain  check  valve  drains enough  fuel  from the  vacuum
          chamber  to avoid  prolonged collection.of the heavy ends
          of the fuel.   If the drainage is insufficient,  the porous
          pad might  encounter plugging problems.   If  the air inlet
          filter to  the  Auto-Miser  is  the porous - wick,  type mat-
          erial  then the maintenance  instructions  are sufficient.
          If  the two  are different the  porous-wick  type material
          may need periodic replacement/ cleaning.  In general, the
          maintenance  instructions appear adequate.

     c.   Effect  of Vehicle  Emissions (non  regulated):    The ex-
          planation  given by  the applicant  appears to be adequate.

     d.   Safety of  the Device:  The  only  safety  problem  evident
          from  the  design  description would  involve a  defective
          anti-backfire  valve and  subsequent  backfires.   Such an
          event  could  cause an explosion.

-------
Durability is also  questionable.   The applicant supplied
little durability data and has only a 90 day warranty for
damages  caused  by  the  Auto-Miser.   While  there is  no
apparent  reason  why  the device is  unsafe,  there is  no
data to show that the device is perfectly safe.

Emission and Fuel Economy Test Results;

1.   The  Brigham  Young  University testing  procedure  is
     quite different  from  the Federal Test Procedure and
     from other laboratory  accepted  methods  of measuring
     for  emissions—-and  fuel economyv   After  discussing
     the  test procedures   with  Dr.  Germane  it  appears
     that:

     a.   Fuel  measurements  were   taken by  a  weighing
          method for  the Auto-Miser  and  a  turbine flow-
          meter for the normal fuel carburetor.

     b.   The test  involved a simulated  cold  start,  raw
          analysis, modal LA-4 type test.

     c.   No  inertia  was   simulated  for  deceleration
          modes.   The dynamometer was attached by an over
          speed-type clutch.

     d.   It  was  not  known how ttte  idle CO  and engine
          speed compared to factory  specifications.   The
          engine  parameters  were   not  adjusted  in  the
          installation of the Auto-Miser.

     e.   Dr.  Germane  felt  that  the  increase  in  fuel
          economy was not  due to  the added vaporization
          of  fuel  but that the  engine,  adjusted to sea
          level specifications, was  running  very rich at
          their  4000  ft.  elevation  laboratory  and  that
          the Auto-Miser worked as  an air bleed device to
          lean out  the  air/fuel  mixture.  He  stated that
          similar  results  could  be  achieved by calibra-
          tion of the fuel/air ratio of the  carburetor to
          a leaner mixture.

2.   The  summary  of  Urban/Highway  Driving  Comparisons;
     This  set of  data  consists  of  notarized  statements
     claiming fuel economy  improvements from installation
     of  the  Auto-Miser.   Because  testing   is  on-road
     observed  fuel   economy  under  non-laboratory  con-
     ditions  this   data  is  not  as  strong  as FTP data.
     Phone calls to verify  the notarized statements found
     two disconnected numbers.

-------
             10
The EG&G Automotive Research Inc. Test Results;
These  test  results  appear  to  be  valid  FTP
results.   Three  vehicles were  tested  with and
without  the  Auto-Miser.    If   any  adjustments
were needed to install the device, another test
sequence  was  run.    Duplicate   test  sequences
were run.   A summary of the test data is given
below:

This data  shows a variety  of  results.   For HC
emissions,  the  Pinto  and  Chevette  showed  a
marked_.improvement while  the Fairmont showed a
HC  penalty  when  compared  with the  adjusted
data.   For CO,  all three vehicles demonstrated
a  marked  improvement.   The NOx values stayed
relatively constant.  The fuel  economy figures,
both FTP and HFET, show no significant increase
or decrease.

-------
Pinto
                                                 EGG  Testing  Summary
FTP
HFET

HC
CO
NOX
CO
F.E.
F.E.

Baseline
(gms/mile)
.728
10.8475
1.790
422.6
20.06 MPG
27.24 MPG
Baseline with
Adjusted Engine
Parameters
(gms/mile)






With Auto-Miser
& Engine Adjusted
(gms/mile)
.443
6.4875
1.8285
416.8
20.70
27.41

% Change Compared to
Baseline
-39..2%
-40.2%
(+)2.15%
-1.38%
(+) .62%
                                                                                            % Change Compared  to
                                                                                           Baseline with Adjusted
                                                                                             Engine Parameters
Fairmont





HFET
HC
CO
NOx
CO
F.E.
F.E.
1.454
4.339
1.460
563.7
15.42 MPG
21.46 MPG
.622
4.011
1.310
573.5
15.24 MPG
21.72 MPG
.867
3.499
1.478
565.30
15.46 MPG
21.82 MPG
-40.4%
-19.4%
(+)1.23%
(-0.28%
(-0.26%
(-01.68%
Chevette





HFET
HC
CO
NOx
CO
F.E.
F.E.
.644
6.672
2.102
299.6
28.41 MPG
38.22 MPG
.738
6.548
1.452
294.4
28.71 MPG
38.16 MPG
.555
5 . 730
1.700
299.6
28.58 MPG
38.84 MPG
-13.8%
-14.1%
-19.1%
0.0%
-.60%
(-01.62%
                                                                                               (+)39.5%
                                                                                                 -12.8%
                                                                                               (-012.81%
                                                                                                  -1.43%
                                                                                                 (-0.46%
                                                                                               (+)24.8%
                                                                                                 -12.5%
                                                                                               (-017.1%
                                                                                                (-01.76%
                                                                                                   -.45%
                                                                                                (-01.

-------
                                      12
     16.   Conclusions of EPA Evaluation:

          It is the  overall  conclusion that this device is not of bene-
          fit to the  nation  as a fuel economy device.  The only  testing
          performed  in  accordance with the  Federal Test Procedures and
          Highway Fuel Economy Test were those run by EG&G.  The  results
          of these tests showed no statistically significant improvement
          in fuel  economy but  did show  a 12%  to  40%  reduction in CO
          emissions.  Thus, it appears that the Auto-Miser may reduce CO
          emissions  but has  little effect  on fuel  economy.   The data
          submitted -with—the—application  does not  substantiate  any
          claims  made  about  the Auto-Miser's  fuel  economy  benefits.
          Claims  of  12-40%  reduction in  CO emissions  can  be substan-
          tiated by  the test data.  Because the  data does not show any
          fuel economy  benefits  the overall conclusion  is that there is
          no need  for the EPA to  design  a test program to further test
          the  device and  that  publication  of  this  analysis  and con-
          clusion fulfills the requirements of Section  511 of the Energy
          Policy and  Conservation Act.

List of Attachments

Attachment A        U.S. Patent Application for Auto-Miser
Attachment B        Installation  Instructions
Attachment C        Test Results  of Bringham Young  University
Attachment D        Summary of Urban/Highway Driving  Comparison
Attachment E        EG&G Automotive Research Test Results

-------
                    13
              ATTACHMENT A
EPA received an application for a patent from the
applicant.  The quality of the copy was very poor
and when reproduced was not sufficiently legible
to be included in this report.

-------
                     Ai-fLj.CA.LiUw FUR  EVALUATION OF THE AUTO-MISER  14


                   EMISSION CONTROL AND  FUEL ECONOMY RETROFIT DEVICE

                                      EXHIBIT "D"
Attachment  B
                                                  Proper operation of the "AUTO-MISER"
                                               gasoline saving system can only be obtained
                                              Dl by a complete understanding of the theory,
                                           —I operation, installation and diagnostic  infor-
                                                mation included in these instructions.
                                                  Attention  to these  instructions will  result
                                               in a cleaner,  more  responsive engine  in alt
                                               operating ranges. The conservative use of these
                                               increased responsiveness should result in fuel
                                               savings.
AUTO-MISER IS A PRODUCT OF
  AUTO-MISER INTERNATIONAL MANUFACTURING CORP.
  2570 GRAVEL STREET
  FORT WORTH, TEXAS 76118   817-284-1425

-------
                                            15

THEORY OF OPERATION
  Vaporized gasoline mixed with the gasoline mist
and air supplied by  the  carburetor will improve
ignition of the total  mixture and more complete
combustion  in the  engine  rather  than in  the
exhaust system.
  As a  result, build up of residue in the combus-
tion  chamber  is reduced, which prolongs  spark
plug, valve and ring life. This reduction in cylinder
deposits  reduces pre-combustion "ping" and  the
build-up of octane requirements.
                 RTUEtSAVtNGfSYSTHI
SYSTEM OPERATION
  The entire system is vacuum operated with the
vacuum source taken  at the Positive  Crankcase
Ventilation (PCV) valve hose. This vacuum is used
to draw gasoline and air into a vaporizing chamber.
The gasoline is vaporized and mixed with air in the
vaporizing  chamber and  drawn  into the engine
through the hose between the PCV valve and base
of the carburetor.
  The gasoline is taken from the fuel supply line
to the engine fuel  pump (suction side) through a
filter  and drawn into the vaporizing chamber. The
amount of fuel is controlled by  a float and valve
in the chamber.
  A porous pad in the bottom of the  vaporizing
chamber is immersed in this fuel.
  Air is   drawn   into the vaporizing chamber
through a filter and into the vaporizing  pad where
it produces vaporized gasoline. The amount of air
and the vacuum in the chamber.is controlled by an
air  inlet control screw located under the  air filter
retaining cap screw.
  The mixture of  vaporized gasoline  and air  is
drawn into the vapor supply hose through an anti-
backfire  check valve  and flow control adjusting
screw. The amount of vapor delivered to the engine
is controlled by this adjusting screw.
  A  spring loaded disc  valve is located at the
bottom of the vaporizing chamber. This is a one-
way drain valve permitting only a small  amount of
fuel to be  drained from the unit when  the engine
stops. The spring  force (fixed) pre-determines the
amount of fuel drained back into  the fuel line. The
purpose of this action is to  provide a fresh supply
of  gasoline for vaporizing each time the engine is
started. The spring-loading also prevents any back-
flow  of fuel into  the vaporizing chamber if the
vehicle is  parked  with the fuel  tank  above the
chamber.
 SYSTEM CONTROL
   Since  the operation  of the "system  is vacuum
 actuated, the  amount  of vacuum  and flow  is
 controlled by the vapor  adjustment screw and inlet
 air adjustment  screw. Both these adjustments are
 made at installation and  should not be changed.
   The purpose of the vapor adjustment screw is to
 match the vapor flow from the unit to the amount
 of vacuum  available from the engine.  The larger
 the engine, the more flow from the unit. Also this
 adjustment is made to limit the amount of vacuum
 taken from the engine so as not to adversely effect
 the PCV  valve operation.
   The air  inlet  adjustment screw  controls the
 amount of air taken into the vaporizing chamber
 which in turn  determines  the   vacuum  in  the
 chamber.. This adjustment serves several purposes:
   1.   "'Amount of vacuum in'the chamber deter-
       mines the vaporizing action.
   2.   Vacuum in the chamber determines amount
       of force available to lift fuel from the fuel
       line into the vaporizing chamber.
   3.   Vacuum has an effect on  the  buoyancy of
       the float; therefore on the fuel level.
PRE-INSTALLATION CHECKS
  This  system  requires  the  following vehicle
configurations   to    exist  before   attempting
installation:
  1.   Carburetor — NOT fuel injection or diesel.
  2.   Engine-mounted  fuel pump —  NOT tank-
       mounted fuel pump.
  3.   PCV valve.
  With  the  engine  at  operating  temperature,
connect and  calibrate an emissions  analyzer and
record emissions  at  idle  and at approximately
2500 RPM. Check for lean misfire due to vacuum
leaks, carburetor malfunction, electrical misfire
and  timing. Adjust  and correct as necessary to
vehicle   manufacturer's   specifications.   These
specifications can be found at various locations
under the hood. Check PCV valve for clean appear-
ance and  proper operation. (Refer to "Trouble
Shooting")  If any doubt of valve condition, replace.
If used over  10,000 miles,  replace  with  OEM
specified parts.
  Check hoses to  and from fuel pump  for tight
connections and hose condition. Locate suction
line from fuel tank and  determine vapor chamber
mounting location as close to fuel  pump as possible.
PRE-INSTALLATION UNIT ASSEMBLY
  Included in the "AUTO-MISER" packaging is a
round  AUTOMATIC DRAIN  VALVE. This valve
has  a 1/8" NPT fitting on one end and a 1/4"
barbed fitting on the other. This is to be installed
into the fitting provided on the bottom of the vapoi
chamber.  Removal  of  the  red  Caplug on  drain
valve and seal  caps is required.

-------
                                           16
     Vapor Hose
     a.
         Locate   hose   conneqting   PCV  valve
         (usually  located on engine  valve cover)
         and the  engine intake manifold or car-
         buretor base.
     b.   Cut hose 3" to 5" away from the engine
         manifold or carburetor base  fitting. Note:
         Keeping  the connection close to  the
         engine provides optimum  system  per-
         formance.
     c.   Install 3/8"  x  3/8" x 3/8"  white tee in
         vapor hose and connect into engine PCV
         hose using three green hose clamps. Note:
         Avoid thermostat housings and  other
         known hot spots.
     d.   Route hose to vapor control valve on top
         of vapor  chamber  and cut to length.
         CAUTION:  When locating  j/apor__hqse,,
         avoid possible broken belt da~m~ageT"  ""
     e.   Install green clamp over cut  end of vapor
         hose.  DO  NOT connect to vapor control
         valve at this time.

SYSTEM CALIBRATION
     Two adjustments are required to match the
system to the engine requirements.
     1.   Adjustment  in the  Vapor  Flow Screw
         located  beneath the black  seal cap on
         top of the vapor chamber.
     2.   Adjustment  in Vapor  Chamber Vacuum
         Screw located under the inlet air filter
         cap retaining screw.
Both of these screws require a 1 /8" hex set screw
wrench.
  '   Note:   The vapor  chamber is shipped  with
            the  vapor adjustment screw in  the
            closed position and the vacuum adjust-
            ment screw in the wide open position.
                    Vacuum
                     Gauge
     and insert between  the  3/8" x 1/4" x
     3/8" tee and the vapor control valve on
     top of the vapor chamber.
c.    Connect a well calibrated vacuum gauge
     to  the remaining 1/4" connection on the
     3/8"x1/4"x 3/8" tee.
d.    Remove black seal cap  from top of vapor
     control valve and be certain vapor adjust-
     ment screw is closed.
e.    Start engine; allow  to reach operating
     temperature.
f.    Observe vacuum reading - normally be-
     tween 16" and 20".
     Caution:  If less than  16" of vacuum is
              observed prior to adjusting the
              vapor  control valve, the engine
              may be in a marginal condition
              for   the  installation.   Any
              vacuum    leak   should   be
              corrected  or out  of  balance
              idle mixture screws  adjusted
              before  continuing  with the
              installation.
g.    With engine  running at idle,  open vapor
     adjustment screw (turn counterclockwise)
     until a 4" reduction in  vacuum reading is
     reached. Example: If the  original vacuum
     reading is  20", open vapor adjusting
     until vacuum drops to  16".
h.    Remove  vacuum  gauge  and  tee  and
     connect vapor  hose  to  vapor  control
     valve using green hose clamp.
i.    Insert seal cap into, top of vapor valve to
     discourage tampering with vapor adjust-
     ment screw.
1.
     Vapor Flow Adjustment
     a.   Insert a 3/8" x 1/4" x 3/8" tee into the
         open end of the vapor hose.
     b.   Use a  short  length of 3/8"  vapor hose

-------
SYSTEM INSTALLATION
1.   Determine best location for vapor chamber
     using these general rules. (Refer to Figure 1)
     a.   Chamber must be mounted vertical.
     b.   Keep chamber close to but above engine
         fuel pump.
     c.   Provide  clearance  from  any  moving
         engine  parts such as fans and belts.
     d.   Allow  sufficient room for system fuel
         and vapor hoses.
2.   Pre-assemble system fuel supply hose.
     a.   Install  the 3/8" x  1/4" x 3/8" tee pro-
     fa,   vided on  the  1/4"  fuel  hose using red
         hose clamp.
     b.   Cut the hose about 3" to 5" from the
         tee. This measurement will vary depend-
         ing upon space available from the suction.
         hose of  the  engine  fuel^pljmp~^e---the:
         bottom of the vapor chamber.
     c.   Install  the white 1/4"  x 1/4" x  1/4"
         tee in the fuel hose using red hose clamps.
         Install  open end of fuel hose on remain-
         ing 1/4" connection on  tee and clamp
         with red hose clamp.
3.   Install fuel supply hose.
     a.   Cut  fuel  suction  hose  to engine fuel
         pump preferably in center of hose being
         certain installed hose will clear all engine
         and frame parts.
     b.   Install  previously assembled -3/8" x 1/4"
         x 3/8" tee on  1/4"  hose to engine fuel
         hose using green hose clamps.
4.   Vapor Chamber.
     a.   Position  vapor chamber vertically and
         locate  mounting  wire  hanger.  Drill  or
         punch  two  1/8" diameter  holes  for
         mounting screws.
         Caution: Vapor chamber must be vertical
         and fuel inlet elbow must be positioned
         toward outside of the vehicle.  Also  be
         certain vapor chamber and hoses will not
         be affected in the event of broken belts.
     b.   Mount vapor chamber in wire support.
     c.   Route  1/4" fuel supply hose to the fuel
         inlet elbow on top.of the vapor chamber.
         Leave  room  in hose  routing to  clear
         existing hoses or vacuum lines and cut to
         length  at fuel inlet elbow.
     d.   Cut  hose between 1/4"  x 1/4"  x  1/4"
         tee previously  installed  and  fuel  inlet
         elbow  connection  for   installation  of
         fuel  filter. Locate filter so it will be close
         to a vertical position.
     e.   Install  fuel filter  with  arrow on filter
         pointed toward fuel inlet elbow using red
         hose clamps.
     f.   DO  NOT  connect fuel  hose to  inlet
         elbow  at this time. Install red clamp over
         open   hose   and   plug  open  end
         temporarily.
     g.   Using remaining 1/4" hose, measure and
         cut  to length  for connection to drain
         valve in bottom of vapor chamber. When
         measuring hose provide sufficient length
         to avoid any  side pull or strain on drain
         valve. Install hose using red hose clamps.
       AUTO-MISER INSTALLATION KIT
A    1 Vaporizing Chamber


B    1 Pre-formed Wire Support


C    1 1/4"x42"Fuel Hose


D    1 3/8" x 42" Vapor Hose


E    1 Hardware Package, with


     F   1 Drain Valve


     G   1 Fuel Filter


     H   81/4" Red Hose Clamps


     I  '  6 3/8" Green Hose Clamps


     J    2 Mounting Screws


     K   3/8" x 3/8" x 3/8" Vapor Tee


     L   3/8" x 1/4" x 3/8" Fuel Tee

-------
                                           18
2.   Vapor Chamber Vacuum Adjustment
     a.   Connect well calibrated vacuum gauge to
         fuel inlet elbow on top of vapor chamber.
         NOTE: Be certain open  end  of 1/4"
         fuel supply hose is plugged.
     b.   Remove screw  and  cap  from top  of
         inlet  air  filter  to  provide access  to
         vacuum adjustment screw.
     c.   With  engine  running, close  (turn clock-
         wise)  vacuum adjustment screw until a
         vacuum reading of 2" minimum to 2 1/2"
         maximum is observed.
         NOTE: This  vacuum  reading is required
         to  insure, proper fuel  level and  vaporiza-
         tion.  An accurate vacuum  gauge  is a
         MUST.
     d.   Disconnect vacuum gauge, remove  plug
         from  fuel supply hose and connect hose
         to  chamber  inlet fuel elbew. -DST-ncii';
         clamp at  this  point  as  a  recheck  of
         vacuum will  be  necessary  after 3-5 min.
         idle time. Emissions will be  erratic for a
         few minutes  while  chamber fills with
         fuel.
SYSTEM ADJUSTMENTS
     Allow engine to idle several minutes to reach
operating temperature and fill vapor chamber with
fuel.  During this  period the  engine  speed will
increase due to the vaporization of fuel starting
to occur in the vapor chamber.
     Connect a calibrated emissions  analyzer and
observe hydrocarbon (HC)  and carbon monoxide
(C.O.).  They  will  vary  as  chamber fills. When
emissions  are steady, the chamber has filled-and
adjustment may be.made.
     1.   Adjust carburetor  idle mixture screw(s)
         for lowest  hydrocarbon  (HC) reading
         without a lean misfire.
         CAUTION: On vehicles with  catalytic
         converters a lean misfire may occur even
         with low  HC reading. Look for an even,
         smooth idle as well as low HC reading.
     2.    Readjust  idle  speed  to vehicle manu-
         facturer's    specifications   shown   on
         emission data/tune up label located under
         the hood in the engine compartment.
     3.    Record emissions at idle and  at approxi-
         mately  2500  RPM  before  and after
         system  installation and save for record
         purposes.
     4.    Final adjustment is to recheck  position
         of the vapor  chamber.  The  chamber
         should be positioned so the fuel inlet is
         either right or left when facing the front
         of the vehicle. The vapor  control valve
         and  inlet  air filter  should  be parallel
          with  the  center line  of the vehicle and
          the fuel  inlet elbow  to the right or  left
         toward the side(s) of the vehicle. This
          assures  proper float/fuel valve cDeration
          under  heavy  braking  or  acceleration
          conditions.
                  DISCLAIMER

     This manual contains certain  information- con-
  cerning the installation and functional operation of
  the AUTO-MISER fuel saving system. Such informa-
  tion is believed to be accurate and  is based upon the
  research   and   experience    of   AUTO-MISER
  International  Manufacturing Corporation. It  is be-
  lieved that proper  application  of the  information
  contained in this manual to the  types of automotive
  vehicles  discussed herein will,  result in  optimum
  performance  and  operating   efficiency  of the
  AUTO-MISER fuel saving system.
     NOTHING CONTAINED HEREIN IS INTENDED
  IN ANY WAY, TO MODIFY OR ENLARGE THE
  WARRANTY OF AUTO-MISER INTERNATIONAL
  MANUFACTURING   CORPORATION  AS  SET
  FORTH IN THE LIMITED WARRANTY GIVEN TO
  BUYEB IN CONNECTION WITH THE  PURCHASE
  OF AN AUTO-MISER UNIT  AND  BUYER IS
  REFERRED SUCH LIMITED WARRANTY FOR A
  COMPLETE  STATEMENT OF ALL WARRANTIES
  GIVEN TO BUYER IN CONNECTION WITH  SUCH
  PURCHASE'
     This manual has been prepared solely for the use
  and benefit of authorized AUTO-MISER dealers and
  is not intended  for the use or benefit of any other
  person or entity. Any reproduction or distribution
  of this manual,  in whole or part, or the divulgence
  of any  of the information contained herein to any
  person or entity, without the express prior written
  authorization   of   AUTO-MISER  International
  Manufacturing Corporation, is strictly prohibited.
TROUBLE SHOOTING
1.   "Lost Gas Mileage" or "No Increase" claim.
     Look for:
     A.   Inaccurate base line
     B.   Vacuum source not adequate due to:
          1)   Clogged carburetor ports or PCV
              valve
          2)   Non-functioning PCV valve
          3)   Improper vapor valve setting (Para.
              No. 1)
          4)   Improper  vapor  chamber vacuun
              (Para. No. 2)
          5)   Improper fuel level
          6)   Improper   combustion  or   wea'
              vacuum
          7)   Poor ignition, plugs, etc.
2.   Diagnosis and Remedies
     A.   Check fuel level in chamber  — Should be
          4 oz.  to  5  oz.  (Para. No.  1  - No.  2
          System Calibration)
     B.   Recheck vacuum settings (Para. No. 1 -
          No. 2 - System Calibration)
     C.   Check emissions for carburetor setting

3.   Excessive Hydrocarbons (HC)
     A.   Incorrect timing
     B.   Incorrect dwell
     C.   Bad ignition points
     D.   Deteriorated spark plugs or S/P wire0
     E.   Lean  misfire, usually indicated by ver/
          io'.v CC reading  and high   HC reading,
          caused by:

-------
                                      19
4.   Excessive Carbon Monoxide Readings (CO)
    A.  Idle  speed  incorrect  -  check  manu-
        facturer's   specifications   and  adjust
        accordingly
    B.  Dirty  air  cleaner  or restriction  in  air
        flow system
    C.  Choke not operating properly
    D.  PCV  system  not  operating  properly
        (replace  PCV  valve - normal  life is
        10,000 miles or per manufacturer's specs)
    E.  To  improve  air/fuel  ratio,  reset  idle
        mixture screws after above checks


5.   Engine Surging or Racing at IdleTWavermg'CO)
    A.  Check carburetor float level or valve
        and seat condition.
    B.  Check fuel filter in gas line to carburetor
    Misfire (Wavering HC)
    A.  Check engine ignition wiring
    B.  Check distributor cap
    C.  Check coil wire for oil on connector
    D.  Check dwell
    E.  Check points
               NOTICE

    The  installation instructions contained, in
  this manual must be strictly followed in order
  to avoid a change in automotive emissions to
  a level in  excess of that  permitted by  the
  Environmental Protection Agency and to allow
  maximum performance by  trie AUTO-MISER
  unit.
    The recommended procedures of the auto-
  mobile manufactureremust be followed with
  respect to carburetor and timing adjustments
  in order to achieve optimum benefit of  the
  AUTO-i'ViiSER unit and to  avoid potential
  voiding  of  the  automobile  manufacturer's
  warranty.
     INSTALLATION OF ANY AUTO-MISER
  UNIT BY OTHER THAN AN AUTHORIZED
  AUTO-MISER DEALER IS NOT RECOM-
  MENDED.   INCORRECT INSTALLATION
  MAY  VOID  MANUFACTURER'S WAR-
  RANTY.    REFER  TO STATEMENT  OF
  LIMITED  WARRANTY  PROVIDED  TO
  BUYER FOR COMPLETE  STATEMENT OF
  WARRANTY AND LIMITATION OF MANU-
  FACTURER'S LIABILITY.
            LIMITED WARRANTY

AUTO-MISER   INTERNATIONAL  MANUFAC
TURING    CORPORATION    ("Auto-Miser"))
warrants to  trie Buyer that the Auto-Miser  uni
purchased by Buyer is free of defects in workmam
ship and material for a period of ninety (90) day
from the date  of installation  by an authorizei
Auto-Miser dealer. If the Auto-Miser unit purchase
by Buyer is  defective, Buyer may return the unit!
with this Warranty, to Buyer's nearest authorizei
Auto-Miser dealer  for replacement or repair, a
Auto-Miser's election. Buyer  shall be responsible
for ati'•" labor charges in the  replacement of tht
Auto-Miser unit.

THERE ARE NO WARRANTIES OTHER THAI^
AS  EXPRESSLY  SET  FORTH HEREIN.  ALT
OTHER  WARRANTIES,  WHETHER ORAL 01
WRITTEN,  EXPRESS OR  IMPLIED, INCLUD
ING ANY WARRANTY OF MERCHANTABILITV
OR  FITNESS  OR  ANY PARTICULAR PUR-
POSE, ARE  HEREBY EXCLUDED, AND, IN NC
EVENT, SHALL  ANY  WARRANTY EXTENT
BEYOND THE NINETY (90) DAY  PERIOC
STATED. AUTO-MISER SHALL, IN NO EVENT
BE LIABLE FOR ANY DAMAGES,  DIRECT 01
INDIRECT,  SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, INCH
DENTAL OR   OTHERWISE.   AUTO-MISER':
WARRANTY HEREUNDER SHALL NOT APPLN.
TO  DAMAGE  OR DEFICIENCIES RESULTINt
FROM  ACCIDENT,  ALTERATION,   MISUSE
TAMPERING, NEGLIGENCE OR ABUSE.

THIS WARRANTY IS NOT TRANSFERABLE T(
ANY OTHER   PERSON  AND  SHALL  APPL\
ONLY  TO  THE  VEHICLE ON WHICH  THI
AUTO-MISER   UNIT COVERED HEREBY I'
ORIGINALLY  INSTALLED  BY AN AUTHOR
IZED AUTO-MISER INSTALLATION AGENT.
  1979 AUTO-MISER INTERNATIONAL MANUFACTURING
  CORPORATION. All rights reserved. No part of this manual
  may be reproduced in any form or by any means without
  permission in writing from AUTO-MISER INTERNATIONAL
  MANUFACTURING CORPORATION, 2570 Gravel Street.
  Fort Worth. Texas 76118.

-------
                            20


                                                         Attachment C


           APPLICATION FOR EVALUATION OF THE AUTO-MISER

         EMISSION CONTROL AND FUEL ECONOMY RETROFIT DEVICE


                           EXHIBIT "E"
            Brigham Young University Engine Dynamometer

               Testing Simulated Urban Driving Cycle
    The tests described in the attached report dated May 21, 1979,
were conducted by the applicant and performed under the direction of
Dr. Geoff J. Germaine.  The test engine used was a 351 cu. in.
displacement Ford engine with no emission device(s) installed other
than the positive crankcase ventilation system.  The computer used
to control and record was.programmed to simulate the Environmental
Protection Agency Urban Driving Cycle.

-------
                                21                       .•-•:'••**.
                                                        *~
                                                       *i

                                                      Brigham Young University
Department of Mechanical Engineering


                                          May 21,  1979
       Mr.  Randall Johnson, President
       Auto Miser International
       2570 Gravel Street
       Fort Worth, TX 76118

       Dear Randy:  "           ——•=--

            This letter will report the  results  of tests conducted with  the
       Auto Miser at Brigham Young  University on May 19 and 21, 1979 with
       the  Department of Mechanical  Engineering's computer-controlled engine
       test cell.

            Tests were run with and without the  device with the EPA Urban
       Dynamometer Driving Schedule.  A  3000 pound vehicle with a three  speed
       transmission was simulated for the  cycle.  The parameters and their
       values which were used  for the simulation are presented on the attached
       sheet.  Previous testing with this  particular vehicle and the EPA cycle
       showed the accuracy to  be well within the limits prescribed in Appendix
       I(b), Chapter I, Title  40 of the  Code of  Federal Regulations.  Addi-
       tionally, the reproduciblHty of  the cycle from test to test was  within
       1% for overall average  engine speed and load.  Engine speed, dynamometer
       torque, fuel flow, and  exhause emissions  (NOX, HC, and CO with Beckman
       NDIR analyzers) were measured and recorded every half second during  the
       tests.  Prior to the tests,  the engine idle screws were adjusted  for
       the  minimum CO and HC exhaust concentrations.

            The results for the EPA urban  cycle  tests are presented below as
       average values for the  complete cycle.

                                                With Device     Without Device

            Brake thermal efficiency (BTE)      0.01649           0.01469

            Fuel Flow (pounds/hr)                6.339*            7.116

            NOX (ppm)                            471               530

            HC (ppm)                             273               296

            CO (volume %)                        0.775             0.885

       *Adjusted by ratio of power  difference from both tests
         242 CB, Brigham Young University, Provo. Utah 84602 (80D 374-1211, Extension 2625



         W::-*^                 '":'-:i':.^-'.:-V;l" ^:'^H'j-'!h::i-H^': :'-^V^i%B:^%:.^i;ฃ^
                                                 "*"" •'<=-•*=•-•<• '"*•-" ---*•—•*—'•ซ=•"ป•"• •-"-—•'

-------
                        22
Mr. Randall  Johnson
Page 2
May 21, 1979
     The Auto Miser device produced a 12.25% improvement in  thermal
efficiency, with a corresponding 10.92% decrease in fuel  consumption,

     All exhaust emissions concentrations  were lower with the device:
NOX was down 11.13%, HC was down 7.77%, and CO was 12.43% lower.

                                  Sincerely,
                                  Geoff J.  Germane, Ph.D.

kf

Enclosure

-------
         23
Parameters for vehicle for EPA cycle:
    Vehicle  weight             3000 pound$
    Frontal  area               22.1 Sq. ft.
   Aerodynamic drag coeff.   0.532
  -flear-ttri-Honing radius "13.4 inches
   Overall gear ratios
                1st gear     9.25
                2nd gear     5.08
                3rd gear    3.03
  Upshifts  occurred at  2400 rpm  Ut to 2nd
  and 2200  rpm 2nd to 3rd

-------
                              24

                                                                  Attachment D
           APPLICATION FOR EVALUATION OF THE AUTO-MISER

         EMISSION CONTROL AND FUEL ECONOMY RETROFIT DEVICE


                          EXHIBIT "F"
           Summary of Urban/Highway Driving Comparisons
    As part of the applicant's product evaluation in day to day
driving conditions, the below listed vehicles were used.  In each
case the application of—the-systenr' was made af ter~*a requested
3000 miles of driving were recorded to provide a base-line for
comparisons.

    In each case the vehicle was taken off the street and emissions
taken with an emission analyzer typical of that in use in automotive
repair shops.  The system was installed without any changes to the
vehicle such as a complete tune up.   The only change made was the .
installation of the system and emissions recorded after installation.
The vehicle was then returned to the owner for continuing recording
of fuel consumption.

-------
                                25
                                      Emissions
Fuel Economy
 1.  78 Pontiac *
     403 CID V/8

 2.  78 Mustang *
     2800 cc V/6

 3.  73 Buick *
     350 CID V/8

 4.  74 Mercury *
     460 CIC V/8

 5.  68 Lincoln
     460 CID V/8

 6.  79 Ford *
     351 CID V/8

 7.  77 Ford *
     302 CID V/8

 8.  78 Chev P.U.*
     350 CID V/8

 9.  79 Ford *
     351 CID V/8

10.  76 Chev *
     454 CID V/8

11.  79 Chev *
     350 CID V/8

12.  79 Olds *
     260 CID V/8

13.  78 Ford Van
     351 CID V/8

14.  79 Ford
     302 CID V/8

15.  79 Pinto
     2300 cc 4 cyl

16.  77 Chevette
     1600 cc 4 cyl

17.  74 Chev
     454 CID V/8
hydrocarbons ppm
Before After
N/A N/A
160 100
"250 -"~-*'- f5
104 55
300 150
480 50
400 40
70 35
220 30
700 50
60 0
60 10
340 80
230 25
200 90
100 15
650 70
Carbon Monoxide % MPG
Before After Before After
N/A N/A 13.2
5.2 .4 15.51
1.9 ~ .01 15.6
12.5
1.4 .01 12.04
9.5
5.5 1.5 9.5
6.5 .08 10.03
5.5 .05 15.5
.6 .25 12.6
2.8 .1 10.0
8.8 .08 10.0
.3 ,05 12.0
.08 .04 15.6
7.80 .6 10.93
3.5 .2 16.0
7.1 2.0 22.1
1.0 .03 26.3
.6 .5 9.5
16.3
22.30
19.7 • Hwy
16.4 City
16.7 Hwy
11.45 City
11.8
12.75
17.2
13.5
12.52
13.9
12.9
16.96
13.7
18.38
25.22
29.55
12.5

-------
                                   26
    18.   79  Ford  P.U.        180        100        4.6       2.3        10.2      11.48
         460 CID  V/8

    19.   79  Lincoln *        N/A        N/A        N/A       N/A        10.31    13.18
         400 CID  V/8

    20.   78  Ford  Van         140         10        8.5        .5        11.48    12.45
         351 CID  V/8

    21.   78  CMC P.U.         110         60         .3        .2        10.0      11.55
         350 CID  V/8
                             Overall Fleet  Average Increase            23.60%
    Attached are the individual record sheets for the above vehicles with
notarized statements (*) included as indicated.

-------
                           27
"Auto-Miser"
A Product of Auto-Miser  International  Mfg.  Corp.
2570 Gravel Street
Ft. Worth, Texas 76118

Gentlemen:

    This letter is to certify  that  your "Auto-Miser" gasoline
saving system which was  installed on my vehicle on   6-22^78	
	 has achieved  the following  results:

      MPG before installation             MPG after installation

               9.5                                   11.8


Very truly yours,
The State of Texas
County of   Tarrant
    Before me, the undersigned,  a  Notary Public in and for said
county, Texas, on this day  personally appeared   Robert T. Allin
_^__^__ _ known to me  to  be  the  person whose name subscribed
to the foregoing instrument,  and  acknowledged to me that he
executed the same for the purpose and considereation expressed.


  v&ซ\ under ray hand and seal  of office this __ / .-^_   day of
                 A.D.  ff -7 
-------
                         28
VEHICLE
   MAKF     Lincoln
   YEAR _
            1968
   ENGINE
            460
EMISSIONS AS RECEIVED
   HYDROCARBONS
   CARBON MONOXIDE
                     — ppm
                   LI	%
EMISSIONS AFTER SYSTEM
   HYDROCARBONS    3-50  ppm
   CARBON MONOXIDE _i^__ %
FUEL ECONOMY
   BEFORE
   AFTER.
            9.5
                 .mpg.
           11.8
                mpg.
                       OWNER
                       ADDRESS
                        PHONE
                                 2/12/79:   60 ppm
                                          .35%
                                   Robert T. All in
                                   9505 Royal Lane
                                   Dallas. Tx 75243
                                   341-7253
INSTALLED AND TESTED BY
          Greg
DATE
          6-22-78
EMISSiON ANALYZER
   MAKE   Delco
   MODEL   ST-500

-------
          'INSULATION COMPANY,  INC
           ENERGY CONSERVATION TECHNOLOGY
                                        July  13, 1979
"Auto-Miser"
A Product of Auto-Miser—IntBfnatldnal Mfg.  Corp.
2570 Gravel Street
Fort Worth, Texas 76118

Gentlemen:

       This letter is  to certify that your "Auto-Miser" gasoline
saving system which was installed on a 1978 Pontiac Bonneville
with 403cu. in. engine has achieved the following results:
       MPG before installation
              13.2
                                     MPG after installation
                                                16.3
Very truly yours,
''XuL  /7&UL
Charles  L. Johnson
President
                                     1978 Pontiac
                                     403 CID V/8
The State  of Texas
County of  Tarrant

Before me,  the undersigned, a Notary Public in and  for said county,
Texas, on  this day personally appeared Charles L. Johnson known to me
to be the  person whose  name subscribed to the foregoi.ng instrument, and
acknowledged to me that he executed  the same for  the purpose and consid
eration expressed.
Given under my hand  and seal of office this

My commission expires:
                                               day of
          i '
                             Notary  Public in and  '"or Tarrant fco. , Texas
     2635 MANAMA DRIVE  •  DALLAS,  TEXAS 75220  •  $214) 350-4869

-------
                           30
"Auto-Miser"
A Product of Auto-Miser  International  Mfg.  Corp.
2570 Gravel Street
Ft. Worth, Texas 76118

Gentlemen:

    This letter is to certify  that  your "Auto-Miser" gasoline
saving system which was  installed on my vehicle on   6-18-79	
	 has achieved  the following  results:

      MPG before installation             MPG after installation

               10.31      ~~""" '              '       13.18


Very truly yours,                        ,„_,„
   *                                     1979 Lincoln Mark V
                                         400 CID -  2V - V8
  v
The State of .Texas
County of
    Before me, the undersigned,  a  Notary Public in and for said
county, Texas, on this day  personally appeared  tf^ySj^ /J . ^-^^j
   _ ___ known to me  to be  the person whose 'mdne subscribed
To the foregoing instrument,  and acknowledged to me that he
executed the same for the purpose  and consideration expressed.

Given under my hand and seal  of  office this   //  ~   day of
                 A. D.  y?      .
        /
                            Notary  Public in and for
                            County,  Texas.
                            My  commission expires

-------
   Gifford-HiSl & tompany
                     CONCRETE DIVISION
   P. O. BOX 4630 • 880 N. HOUSTON STREET • A/C 817 626-8201 ซ FT. WORTH
"Auto-Miser"
A Product of Auto-Miser International  Mfg. Co
2570 Gravel Street
Ft.  Worth, Texas 76118

Gentlemen:

    This letter is to certify that  your  "Auto
saving system which was installed on my  vehic
	 has achieved the following  results

      MPG before installation           MPG

               10


Very truly yours,
The State of  Texas
County of
    Before  me,  the undersigned,  a Notary Publi
county,  Texas,  on this day personally  appearedl
             known to me to be the person whosi
        _
to the for ego ing  instrument,  and acknowledged
executed the same for the purpose and consider
Given under my  hand and seal of office  this
                A.D,  /f 7 ?
                          Notary Public  in an-
                          County,  Texas.

                          My commission  expirs

-------
                        32
              AUTO-MISER
                  EMISSION
VEHICLE
   MAKP    CMC
   YEAR    1978
           Pick up
           12,520 mi.
   ENGINE
    35Q/4
EMISSIONS AS RECEIVED  -
   HYDROCARBONS _Jio_ ppm "le
   CARBON MONOXIDE -3      %
                                2500 RPM = 40 ppm
                                         .25%
EMISSIONS AFTER SYSTEM INSTALLATION
   HYDROCARBONS __ฃ0___ ppm idle         2500 RPM - 20 PPm 4
   CARBON MONOXIDE _^	%                      . 18%
FUEL ECONOMY
   BEFORE
   AFTER-
           10.0
          mpg.
    11.55
         mpg.
                       OWNER
                           Ken Parton
                       ADDRESS
                           4416 Stanley Keller Rd,
                                  Haltom City, Tx 76117
                       PHONE
                           838-7467
                                  626-8201 Work
INSTALLED AND TESTED BY
.	R. T.  Allin	
DATE
6-6-79
EMISSION ANALYZER
   MAKE    Delcฐ
   MODEL
            ST-500

-------
                                      lSSr*VV •*"ฃ•*-*• -O,',*"' ." * •"--"'
          1 ,,-.• **•'[* •VfiV'Vib.f

          •AปvlSS&VX,"-L. ' :
          ^ A"tft*ฅ''*.1 —• '

          •'••wMa: ••>-
                  $:f ':;V~ ;:.^V


_  -  ^;;|yfs^Wiฃ:ซ;^ปipp-,*i^^g^


"'v*^^;/;;;x:'^'S^^te^;-*^^f
    '"••''  .- ''^ '•'',;.''.•'• j-^.1:.^'" " '  .. V0,''.' .•••*'•.'• -V. f^C^^^^^MV''- '••'•• '';ซ. -' "- .

-------
             AUTO-MISER INTS-KdATSOMAL
                 EMISSION EVALUATION
VEHICLE
   MAKE_
   YEAR _
       Ford
       1979
   ENGINE
       351/2
EMISSIONS AS RECEIVED
   HYDROCARBONS  ' 48(f"
   CARBON MONOXIDE   6-5
EMISSIONS AFTER SYSTEM
   HYDROCARBONS   14o   ppm
   CARBON MONOXIDE _J _ %

FUEL ECONOMY
   BEFORE  IP- Q3  mpg.
   ARTS   12-75 mpg
                      OWNER.
                      ADDRESS
                      PHONE
                         5-14-79 Recheck Emissions;
                            HC   50 ppm
                            CO
.08 %
                          Kyle W.Brown
                          208 Baker Drive
                                  Hurst, Texas
INSTALLED AND TESTED BY
        R. T. Allin
DATE
3-16-79
EMISSION ANALYZER
   MAKE    DELCO
   MODEL   ST-500

-------
                            35
"Auto-Miser"
A Product of Auto-Miser  International  Mfg.  Corp.
2570 Gravel Street
Ft. Worth, Texas 76118

Gen tlemen :

    This letter is  to certify  that  your "Auto-Miser" gasoline
saving system which was  installed on my vehicle on  ^ -p?p- 79
__ has achieved  the  following  results:

      MPG before installation,  .          MPG, after installation
Very truly yours,
                                          1974 Mercury
                                          460 CTD - 4V-V8
The State of Texas
County of
    Before me, the undersigned,  a Notary Public 19 and for
county, Texas, on this  day  personally appeared ^/>/^i ฃr    SL ฃ -(. '
_ known  to me  to  be  the person whose name subscribed
to the foregoing  instrument,  and acknowledged to me that he
executed the same for the purpose and cons iderea t ion expressed.

                                                 .' A"
Givery under my hand and seal  of office this    / /   -- day of
    >-^"        A.D.  79
   ^   7
                                                       -1
                            Notary Public in and for J>-YI'.-<  > •< ^ ซ. '
                            County,  Texas.

                            My commission expires  -^-' ,  „ /' <
                                                   ^-

-------
                        36
VEHICLE
   MAKE  MERCURY
   YEAR  1974
   ENGINE 46Q/4bbi.
EMISSIONS AS RECEIVED
   HYDROCARBONS   L04
                       ppm
   CARBON MONOXIDE
EMISSIONS AFTER SYSTEM ^INSTALLATION
   HYDROCARBONS    35   ppm
   CARBON MONOXIDE   .01    %

FUEL ECONOMY
   BEFORE 9,5/12. 04mpg.
   AFTER  11. 45/16. 7mpg
                        OWNER
                                ROBERT T. ALLIN
                        ADDRESS 9505 ROYAL
                                DALLAS, Tx.  75243
                        PHONE
                                2.14/ 341-7253
INSTALLED AND TESTED BY
      R. T. Allin
DATE  6-22-7Q
EMISSION ANALYZER
   MAKE    Dclco
   MODEL
            ST-500

-------
                           37.-
"Auto-Miser"
A Product of Auto-Miser  International Mfg.  Corp.
2570 Gravel Street
Ft. Worth, Texas 76118

Gentlemen:

    This letter is to certify  that your  "Auto-Miser" gasoline
saving system which was  installed on my  vehicle on   //- O3
_ has achieved  the following results:

      MPG before installation             MPG after installation
Very truly yours,
                                         1973 Buick
                                         350 CID 2V-V8
The State of Texas
County of r
    Before me, the undersigned,  a  Notary  Public \j. and for said
county, Texas, on this day personally  appeared /^^^^z ซ=>?.' ^t^
        _ known to me  to be  the person whos e name subscr ibed
to the foregoing instrument,  and acknowledged to me that he
executed the same for the purpose  and  conaideraation expressed.
                                                /
Given\ under my hand and seal of  office  this   //      day of
                 A.D.
                            Notary  Public  in and
                            County,  Texas.

                            My  commission  expires

-------
                        38
              AUTO-MISER INTERNATIONAL
VEHICLE
   MAKF     Buick
   YEAR     1973
   ENGINE   350/4
EMISSIONS AS RECEIVED
   HYDROCARBONS  26g   ppm
   CARBON MONOXIDE 1-9     %

EMISSIONS AFTER SYSTEM INSTALLATION
   HYDROCARBONS   25   ppm
   CARBON MONOXIDE  -Qi    %
FUEL ECONOMY
   RFFDPF12.5/15.6 mpg
   AFTFP 16.4/l9.7mpg
    560Q miles with unit
                      OWNER
                      ADDRESS
                      PHONE
                                  Robert T. Allin
9505 Royal //'1040
                                  Dal lac
214/341-7253
INSTALLED AND TESTED BY
       R.  T .  A n ^.-.
DATE
       2-7-79
EMISSION ANALYZER
   MAKE    "FT.rn
   MODEL   ST-5QQ

-------
                          39
   MAKE
   YEAR
    Chevrolet
     1979  Chevette
   ENGINE
            1600 cc/1
EMISSIONS AS RECEIVED
   HYDROCARBONS   iQQ   ppm  idle
   CARBON MONOXIDE  1-ฐ     %
EMISSIONS AFTER SYSTEM INSTALLATION
   HYDROCARBONS   15    ppm  idle
   CARBON MONOXIDE ___^03__%
FUEL ECONOMY
   BEFORE
   AFTER-
            26.3
          mpg.
    29.55
         mpg.
                                        2500RPM = 40 ppm
                                               .1 %
                                        2500 RPM = 10 ppm
                                                .03 %
                        OWNER    Randal 1 W. .Tphnsnn
                        ADDRESS
                        PHONE
SNSTALLED AND TESTED BY
     R. T. Allin
DATE
6-7-79
EMISSSON ANALYZER
   MAKE    Delco
   MODEL   ST-5QO

-------
                        40
VEHICLE
   MAKE     Ford Pinto
   YEAR     1979 _ 7.000 mi.

   ENGINE
EMISSIONS AS RECEIVED
   HYDROCARBONS _2M_ ppm IDLE             2500 RPM = 100
   CARBON MONOXIDE  7.1     %                          . 3

EMISSIONS AFTER SYSTEM INSTALLATION
   HYDROCARBONS __?JL_ ppm JDLE             2500 RPM = 50
   CARBON MONOXIDE   2-ฐ    %                          *. 18

FUEL ECONOMY
   BEFORE —JiLi
   AFTFP    25-22 mpg

   NOTE: No carburetor adjustment,
                        OWNER _ Test Vehicle
                        ADDRESS
                        PHONE
INSTALLED AND TESTED BY
	R.  T. Allin
DATE 	6-9-79
EM9SSION ANALYZER
   MAKE
   MODEL     ST-5QO

-------
                         41
              AUTO-M3SER INTERNATIONAL
VEHICLE
   MAKE 	Ford Fairmont
   YEAR 	1979	100 mi.
   ENGINE     102/2	

EMISSIONS AS RECE8VED__,.
   HYDROCARBONS_230_ppm IDLE            2500 RPM = 60
   CARBON MONOXIDE  3.5    o/o                         .21

EM5SS!ONS AFTER SYSTEM IftSSTALLATSON
   HYDROCARBONS _2L5_ ppm IDLE            2500 RPM = 30^
   CARBON MONOXIDE   .2    %                          . i

FUEL ECONOMY
   BEFORE   16.Q   mpg.
   AFTER    18.38 mpg.
   NOTE:  No carburetor adjustment
                      OWNER	Test Vehicle	\	
                      ADDRESS
                      PHONE
INSTALLED AND TESTED BY
        R. T. Allin
DATE__ฑฑ21
EMISSION ANALYZER
   MAKE
   MODEL   SI-SOP

-------
                         42
VEHICLE
   MAKE
   YEAR
Ford
13^458 miles
1979
   ENGINE
460/4
EMISSIONS AS RECEIVED
   HYDROCARBONS   I8ฐ   ppm
   CARBON MONOXIDE 4-6     %

EMISSIONS AFTER SYSTEM INSTALLATION
   HYDROCARBONS   100  ppm
   CARBON MONOXIDE,
                  2.3
FUEL ECONOMY
^
   BEFORE   10.2   mpg.
   AFTFP    11.48  mpg
                       OWNER
                                  John Hill
                       ADDRESS
                    1500 Sylvan  //145
                                  Hurst, Texas
                                  268-1771
SNSTALLED AND TESTED BY
     R. T. Allin
DATE_ฑฑ21
EMISSION ANALYZER
   MAKE
   MODEL   SI-SOP

-------
             AUTO-MISER INTERNET!ฉ*-
                 EMISSION EVAlUATIOiv
VEHICLE
   MAKE    Chevrolet
   YEAR _
1974
   ENGINE
A^A/A
EMISSIONS AS RECEIVED
   HYDROCARBONS _
   CARBON MONOXIDE
EMISSIONS AFTER SYSTEM INSTALLATION
   HYDROCARBONS   70    ppm
   CARBON MONOXIDE -5     %
FUEL ECONOMY
   RFFDPF  9.5    mpg
   AFTER   12.5   mpg.
                      OWNER
                      ADDRESS
                      PHONE
                     Walter Myer
                     10718 Presidential
                                Dallas. Texas
                     214-341-9987
                                       A3
INSTALLED AND TESTED BY
     R. T. Allin
PATE 4-11-79
EMISSION ANALYZER
 '  MAKE    Delco
   MODEL
 ST-500

-------
                           44
"Auto-Miser"
A Product of Auto-Miser International Mfg.  Corp.
2570 Gravel Street
Ft. Worth, Texas 76118

Gentlemen:

    This letter is to certify that your  "Auto-Miser" gasoline
saving system which was installed on my  vehicle  on    5-31-79
	 has achieved the following results:

      MPG before installatJLoHv,  ;          MPG-after installation

                 11.48


Very truly yours,
The State of Texas
County of
    Before me, the undersigned,  a Notary  Public i. and for said
county, Texas, on this day personally  appeared
             known to me  to be  the  person  whose n am esu escribed
to the foregoing instrument, and  acknowledged to me that he
executed the same for the purpose and  cons idereat ion expressed.
Given under my hand and seal of  office  this   y7^'•'    day of
                 A-D-  i
                           Notary  Public in and for
                           County,  Texas.

                           My  commission expires  _<ฃ'

-------
                             45
VEHICLE
   MAKE_
   YEAR _
Ford Van
1978
23.400 mi.
   ENGINE
351/2V
EMISSIONS AS RECEIVED—
   HYDROCARBONS    1*0   ppm idle
   CARBON MONOXIDE  8.5     %
                           2500 RPM =  100 ppm

                                     4.4%
EMISSIONS AFTER SYSTEM INSTALLATION
   HYDROCARBONS	ID	ppm idle          2500 RPM = 20
   CARBON MONOXIDE  -S      %                       . 8%
FUEL ECONOMY
   BEFORE n-48   mpg.
   AFTER  12.45  mpg.
                        OWNER
                        PHONE
                    Keith Brown
                        ADDRESS   10 Kingston
                                  Bedford. TX 76021
                    268-4841
INSTALLED AND TESTED BY
      R. T. All in
DATE  5-31-79
EMISSION ANALYZER
   MAKE    Delco
   MODEL   ST-500

-------
                          46


           TARRANT COUNTY JUNIOR COLLEGE BOOKSTORES

          FORT WORTH, TEXAS    JACK LEGETT, MANAGER    TELEX 75-8286
 "Auto Miser"
 A Product of  Auto-Miser  International  Mfg. Corp.
 2570 Gravel Street
 Ft.  Worth, TX  76118

 Gentlemen:

 This letter is  to certify^ that your  "Auta-Miser"  gasoline
 saving system which was  installed on vehicle on  6-1-79
 has  achieved  the following results:

      MPG before installation  MPG after installation

                 15.5                      17.2

   ry truly/^ours,
          - ' *                           1977 Ford Granada
                                        302 CID - V8        *
 The State of  Texas
 County of Tarrant

 Before me,  the undersigned,  a Notary  Public in  and for
 said county of Texas on  this day personally appeared
 Jack Legett known to me  to be the person whose  name   *
 subscribed  to the foregoing instrument,  and acknowledged
 to me that  he executed the same for the  purpose and
 consideration expressed.

 Given under my hand and  seal of office this 6th day of
 July, 1979  A.D.
                               Notary  Public in and  for
                               Tarrant County Texas.

                               My commission expires
                                             RUBY CROSS. Motor? Public
                                             in and for Terra.-.! To-inty. 7ปX*ป
South Campus Bookstore
  5301 Campus Drive
For: Worth, Texas 76119
  Phone 81 7,  534-4861
Northeast Campus Bookstore
   828 Harwood Road
   Hurst, Texas 76053
   Phona817. 281-7860
Northwest Campus Bookstore
 4801 Marine Creek Parkway
  Fort Worth, Texas 76179
   Phone 81 7. 232-2900

-------
                          47
   MAKE
   YEAR
Ford Grp.uacla
1977
36Q48 mi
   ENGINE    302/2	no pump
EMISSIONS AS RECEIVED*— '
   HYDROCARBONS    400  ppm     Idle
   CARBON MONOXIDE  5-5    %
   HYDROCARBONS    40	ppm  Idle
   CARBON MONOXIDE  -Q5    %
   BEFORE   is s   mpg,  Hyw-AC
   AFTFP    17.2   mpg    Hwy -AC

                        OWPiER.
                        ack
                                     2500  RPM =  250
                                                  1.0
                                      2500  RPM =30
                                                 .05
                              sec    1121 Forest Oak Drive
                                    Hurst. TX 76053
                                    282-2384
INSTALLED AKD JESTED BV
         R.  T. Allin
         6-1-79
EMISSION ANALY2ER
   fVSODEL
               ST-500

-------
                               48
"Auto-Miser"
A Product of Auto-Miser International  Mfg.  Corp.
2570 Gravel Street
Ft. Worth, Texas  76118

Gentlemen:

    This  letter  is to certify  that  your "Auto-Miser"  gasoline
saving system which was installed on my vehicle on    5-25-79	
	 has achieved the following  results:

      MPG before  installation             MPG after  installation

               12.6 '         """'' !             "        13-5


Very truly yours.                          1978 Chevrolet %  ton Pickup
                                           350 CID -  4V - V8
The State of  Texas
County of      Tarrant	


    Before  me,  the undersigned,  a Notary Public  in  and for said
county, Texas,  on this day personally appeared   Robert W  Sellers
              known to me to  be  the person whose  name  subscribed
Tothe foregoing instrument,  and acknowledged to me that he
executed  the  same for the purpose and considereation  expressed.

                                                „ '-.•//;
Given under my hand and seal of  office this  ^        day of
                  A.D. /y"'--9	.
   T
                            Notary Public in and  for  ^ '&^/ ;.$'><_
                            County,  Texas.
                                                    Ssiori Expfrcs Ociober 20. 1979
                             My  commission expires    _ .

                               Karen M. Jsnkin5: Notary Public
                               Tdrranl Countyj Texas

-------
                             49
MAKE	
YEAR      1978
             Chevrolet  4 ton pickup
                         Mileage 13,256
   ENGINE
 MISSIONS AS RECEIVED
   HYDROCARBONS   70      ppm  idle
   CARBON MONOXIDE   -&    %
   HYDROCARBONS	15	ppm  idle
   CARBON MONOXIDE   .25    %
   BEFORE  12.6     mpg.
   AFTER   13.5    mpg.
                                        2500 RPM = 45 ppm
                                                   .3%
                                        2500 RPM =  15
                                                   .25%
                                      R. W.  Sellers
                          ADDRESS    --2 Rancho Drive
                                     Keller. TX 76248
5NSTALLED AMD TESTED BY
     R. T. All in
DATE   5-25-79
EMISSION ANALYZER
             Dplco
   MODEL    ST-50Q

-------
                      '-'  \l(:l'•< i(.:':'L'. /?•!!

                             • if-j rr~-
                                    May  >: .
"Auto-Miser"
A PRODUCT OF AUTO-MISER INTERNATIONAL  MFC  CORP.
2570 Gravel Street
Fore Worth. 'Texas. -26 l-i3--~- -'

Gentlemen:

I am happy to report  that your "Auto-Miser" gasoline saving
system which was installed on my vehicle en 2-5-79  has
produced far better results than I had expected.  Prior to
installation my MPG was accurately tested and verified to
be 10.   Since installation on the above date my MPG has
been raised to 13.9
10-74 ^    i  * IT
1976 Chevrolet Wagon
454CID-4V-V8
                                    Sincerely.

                                    NEWELL & NEWELL  BUSINESS PARK

                                    --~e  !  -   -  V-          .^ -
                                    . •'..-    •--   f^-'  . -. --* •  ••

                                    W.  J'. Newell
WJN/tg

THE  STATE OF TEXAS

COUNTY OF TARRANT           '                   .

lie-fore ne,  :h.e undersigned, a Notary Public  L::  md for sai.:"
r.M'unt.y, Texas , on  this day personally appearet:  i\   .f_.	NTev.-o11
<'icป.vn co me to be  the person whose  name subscr ilv J Lo the
iorc-yoJn^ instrument, and acknowledged Lo me : hac he
cxcuted the sarnci for the purpose  and consideration express^

     -n up.cier my har.c! and seal of office this   JL->L   tiay v:
   >;.-iv        A. D     1979
                                     Not.'!!'•• ''ur  .ซ  ; 11 am.1  t\ปr  '.'. i c
                                     COUP, c •. .  [\ -  .

                                     Mv i.-iป'-::-; vj.     vx^irc-s  6--   ^0

-------
                          51
VEHICLE
•ff Sm m la'Wnnltt
   MAKE
   YEAR
   ENGINE
SFปa|
civ
   HYDROCARBONS   ^   ppm
   CARBON MONOXIDE  • &&   %
   BEFORE  mn   mpg.
   AFTER    13.ป  mpg.
                        ADDRESS
EMISSIONS AS RECEiVED—
   HYDROCARBONS _2ฃฃ_ ppm /^-^  feAfi***.  'If 00
   CARBON MONOXIDE _JLl_ % /<-//
-------
                             52
                                of
                   POLICE DEPARTMENT,  Chief of Police J B  Wallace
 June  5,  1979
 "Auto-Miser"
 A  Product of Auto-Miser International  Mfg. Corp.
 2570  Gravel Street
 Ft. Worth, Texas 76118

 Gentlemen:

      This letter is to certify that your  "Auto-Miser'! gasoline saving
 system which was installed on my vehicle  on 4-2-79 has achieved the
 following results.
          MPG before installation

                 12.0
 Very /truly yours,
  ~^'\. - ฃ- •
/.  B.  Wallace
 Chief  of Pol ice
MPG after installation

      12 9


1979 Chevrolet
350-4V--V3
 The  State of Texas
 County of Tarrant

      Before me, the undersigned,  a  Notary Public in and for said county,  Texas,
 on this day personally appeared  J. B. Wallace	   known to me  to  be  the
 person whose name subscribed to the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to me
 that he executed the same for the purpose and consider-^-"on expressed.
                                                          June
                   A.D. 1979.
Given under  my  hand and seal of office this 	5	 day

                                         (2^w*
                                       Notary PubhT i* and for Tarrant Co7 Texas
 My  commission expires Oct, 1981.
               P.O.BOX 157
    BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021

-------
                           53
   MAKE     Chevrolet

   YEAR     1979
   ENGINE   350/4
HYDROCARBONS
   CARBON MONOXIDE
                         ppm
    SS10PIS AFTER SYSTEM !
   HYDROCARBONS     o   ppm
   CARBON MONOXIDE   -05    %
   BEFORE   12.0    mpg.
   AFTER    12-9  mpg.
                                     City of Bedford
                          ADDRESS    J. 8. Wallace, Chief of Police
                          	Bedford, Texas	
                                     283-5531
INSTALLED AWD TESTED
     R. T. Aliin
DATE  ^-2-
EMISS8ON ANALYZED
           Delco
    WIODEL  ST-500

-------
                                 54
.1

'A I .1 -I .\ M i 1 \llv\l-.

•-•. i i .t ,\ •••' '• MI .u- =v- rr i

M. \\ ONI. M K.\- t M M

i.VI.K M' i I I.I.I ', '.
                                 X'l'TMU' \ !-:T.-, \'|' j.AU

                                ,\;\ l-'l-'l N S-JI S Iv'K III I I.in \(
                                 it.\i i \>.. r\- A \.*-% T:'.-JO-J

                                    -,M i. ^.:.i i :•.-,:,

                                   TU \ )i I o-^f i ! !i I !>7

                                  May 31, 1979
       "Auto-Miser"
       A  Product of Au-to-Mirser-liTtefnational  Mfg?" Corp
       2570  Gravel Street
       Ft. Worth,  Texas  76113
       Gentlemen:

             This letter is  to  certify that  your "Autc-Miser"  gasoline
       saving system which  was installed on my vehicle on  May 11, 1979,
       has  achieved the following results:                      •*
               MPG before  installation
MPG after  installation
                         15.6
         16.96
          1979 Oldsmobile Wagon
                                             II.  Wayne Meachuir
        The  State of Texas
        County of
             Before me,  the  undersigned,  a  Notary Public  in and for said
        county, Texas, on  this day personally appeared    jj.
               known  to me  to be the person  whose naitit.-  subscribed to  the
        foregoing instrument,  and acknowledged to me that  he executed  tin
        same for the  purpose and consideration expressed.

        Given under ray hand and seal of  office this  ^ / —  day of
                          A.D.  \^Y\	•        -
                                	1	J	1	J	        r \             \
                                              _       -,
                                             Notary Pub/ic  .rti an
                                             County, Te'xas*-
                                             My Commission  expires

-------
                           55
   MAKE 	Oldsmobile

   YEAR       1979
   ENGINE
     260/2
EMISSIONS AS RECEIVED
   HYDROCARBONS
            60
   HYDROCARBONS
                     10
   CARBON MONOXIDE
   BEFORE  15.&    mpg.
   AFTER   16-96   mpg.
                ,ppm
   CARBON MONOXIDE   -08    %
                 ppm
                                       Wayne Meacham
                                       Denton & Generes
                         -555 Griffin.Sq. Bids. .  Suir.e 920. Dallas. Texas 75202
                                 	214/651-1355	
INSTALLED AMD TESTED BY
        R.  T. Allin	
DATE
3-11-79
 EMISSION ANALYZER
    MAKE      Delco
    MODEL     ST-.500

-------
                             56
"Auto-Miser"
A Product of Auto-Miser  International Mfg.  Corp.
2570 Gravel Street
Ft.  Worth, Texas 76118

Gentlemen:

    This letter is  to certify  that  your "Auto-Miser" gasoline
saving system which was  installed on my vehicle on June 6, 1979
  	  has achieved  the  following results-
      MPG before installation
MPG after installation
              15.51
Very truly yours,
                                          1978 Ford Mustang
                                          2800 cc  V-b
The State of^Texas
County of
    Before mo, the undersigned,  a Notary Public i.n and for said
county  Texas, on this  day  personally appeared  ^--, i/<*. /.'. /'~^-f
^__^	known to me  to be the person whose name" subscribed"
To th e~ fore going instrument,  and acknowledged tc me  that he
executed the same for the purpose and considareation expressed.
Given under my hand  and  seal  of office this
   /r^-cwA.D.  T^
            dav of
                            Notary Public in and for
                            County,  Texas.

                            My commission expire1-


-------
   MAKE
   YEAR
              1978
   ENGINE
              2800/V6
EMISSIONS AS RECE8VED— ;
   HYDROCARBONS _I60_ ppm  idle
   CARBON MONOXIDE  5.2     %
                                         2500 RPM = 150

                                                  3.2%
EMISSIONS AFTER SYSTEM
   HYDROCARBONS __lflfi_ppm  idle
   CARBON MONOXIDE _^	%
   BEFORE
                  mpg.
   AFTPP   22.30  mng.
                                         2500 RPM = 60
                                                  .5%
                                  Car la D. 3rown
                                   1705 Metro #102
                                   Carrollton. Texas
INSTALLED AND TESTED BY
        R. T. Allin
DATE
        6-7-7S
EMISSION ANALYZER
            Delco
   MODEL
            ST-500

-------
                   WILLIAM A. SOLEMENE & ASSOCIATES
                       3131 TURTLE CREEK BLVD.' SUITE 1O1O- DALLAS TEXAS 7S2I9
"Auto-Miser"
A Product of Auto-Miser  International Mfg. Corp.
2570 Gravel Street
Ft. Worth, Texas 76118

Gentlemen:        "    —    -—ซ••- ••

    This  letter is  to certify  that your "Auto-Miser" gasoline
saving system which was  installed on my vehicle on    4-9-79
           has achieved  the following results:
      MPG before  installation

               10.0
MPG after  installation
Very truly yours,
1979 Ford LTD
351 CID - V8
The State of  Texas
County of   /),,-, ,'/ซ $
    Before me.  the  undersigned, a Notary Public  in  and for said
county,  Texas,  on  this day personally appeared  , ,. .  L L t
                                                             r
  r  s > ,\JL t\_. .-  known to me to be the person whose  name  subscribed
To  the  foregoing instrument,  and acknowledged  to me  that he
executed the  same for the purposa and consideration  expressed.
Given under  my  hand and seal of office this
             day of
                            Notary Public  in  and  for
                            County, Texas.

                            My commission  expires    ,

-------
                         59
   MAKE
   YEAR 	iq?g
   ENGINE
           351/2
   HYDROCARBONS    220    ppm
   CARBON MONOXIDE. 2.8      %

 •MISSIONS AFTER SYSTEM
   HYDROCARBONS     30    ppm
   CARBON MONOXIDE  .1      %
EL
BEFORE
AFTER.
             10.
                  mpg.
                                    William A. Solamene
                         ADDRESS
                                 3131 Turtle Creek Blvd.
                                    Dallas. Texas 75219
                                    214/521-8050
INSTALLED AND TESTED BY
       R. T. Allin
DATE
       4-9-79
EMISSION ANALYZER
   MAKE     Delco
   MODEL
             ST-500

-------
                            60
   MAKE
   YEAR
Ford Van
1978
   ENGINE
               351-CID V8
   HYDROCARBONS   34ฐ     ppm
   CARBON MONOXIDE __Zi8o_o/0
   HYDROCARBONS     80    ppm
   CARBON MONOXIDE   -6     %
   BEFORE    iQ-93  mpg.
   AFTER,
             13.7
   mpg.
                          ADDRESS
                          PHONE
                                       Randall W. .Johnson
                        305 Baker Drive
                                       Hurst,  Texas
                        268-5648
INSTALLED AND TESTED BY
      R.  T. Allin
        2-7-79
E^SSIQN ANALYZER
    MAKE    De]r-ฐ
    MODEL   ST-500

-------

                            61
                                                                    Attachment E
           APPLICATION FOR EVALUATION OF THE AUTO-MISER

         EMISSION CONTROL AND FUEL ECONOMY RETROFIT DEVICE


                           EXHIBIT "G"
            EG&G Automotive Research Inc.  Test Results


    The applicant contracted this facility to conduct tests which
would be in accordance with the Fe_deral Test Procedure.   Additional
tests were conducted tcTmeasure" emissions  before and after the
catalytic converter to evaluate the effect of the system on emissions
with and without the influence of the catalytic converter.

    The criteria used in selecting these particular vehicles was to
provide not only various size engines but  also new versus used vehicles.

    Since the EG&G facility is located approximately 300 miles frotm
the applicant, the vehicles fuel consumption was measured driving to
EG&G without the system and return with the system.  The following-
comparisons were noted under highway driving conditions with air
conditioning in use, following same route  and using the same fuel.

        Vehicle            Base Line to EG&G        With System Installed

       79 Fairmont              16.0 MPG                18.38 MPG

       79 Pinto                 22.1 MPG                25.22 MPG

       77 Chevett-2              26.3 MPG                29.55 MPG

-------
       ^3^V^r. ,viM:,f:'-v iV—"ฃ?:?•> >-"^'.^tr/;,;^xv
       '?** - ;>•"•'-•-."/ •  . ",V-"*>r'  ;;rV'^"- H-.?'O'ฃ-.
                FUEL ECONOMY.AND EXHAUST EMISSIONS

                  EVALUATION USING THREE VEHICLES
                   FOR AUTO-MISER INTERNATIONAL.

                       AR PROJECT NO. 79091

              AUTO-

  APPLICATION FOR EVALUATION OF THE
  •MISER EMISSION CONTROL AND FUEL  ECONOMY
           RETROFIT DEVICE
                              CAtlJ.DJ.0.   u     _

                   - ~??y|^W,j-:^'^
                   •:- •'^•V-.•'. 3:;%^ft 3:^r-'^v;;^;[:^C-"'^^'l^V-^\^
                                    giJ.??-'?.'.X'ifet::1 —,    — '.—^ปr%^vu yซa ^^**?iT'^S^^
                                    ^v^-^^S^t^r'/^^^^^l^^s

n
^LTTOVKJT/V^ RESEARCH^I^iljl
"World's largest independent automotive testing organization."  VV;^^^--^;^;
'\%:?i:'>''^X^ir^:^>VV'V-l^;;^^>:;^
                                                iW^waffiNBtUW^'U^Ai^MJ..!^

-------
                    63
FUEL ECONOMY.AND EXHAUST EMISSIONS

  EVALUATION USING THREE VEHICLES
   FOR AUTO-MISER INTERNATIONAL
       AR PROJECT NO. 79091
               PORTED BY:
         "MAURICE L.  FORSHEE
          PROJECT SUPERVISOR
              APPROVED  BY:
             ALBERT NAEGELIT
          BUSINESS CELL MANAGER
       CHASSIS DYNAMOMETER TESTING
 POWER SYSTEMS RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
               SUBMITTED BY:
      EG&G AUTOMOTIVE RESEARCH, INC.
             5404 HANDERA ROAD
         SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS  78238

               JULY 13, 1979
                                                                 sm^mmK-t:
                                                                 ^mtist&$&ฃ?

-------
                                        64
                      FUEL ECONOMY AND EXHAUST EMISSIONS
                        EVALUATION USING THREE VEHICLES
                         FOR AUTO-MISER INTERNATIONAL
                             AR PROJECT NO. 79091

                               TABLE OF CONTENTS
NOTICE OF DISCLAIMER
                                                                         PAGE
FORWARD	..  .   ii
TEST PROCEDURE
TUNE-UP
TESTING SERIES 	 	    2
ATTACHMENT 1 - TEST SCOPE	    6
ATTACHMENT 2 - VEHICLE INSPECTION AND TUNE-UP	10
ATTACHMENT 3 - AUTO-MISER INSTALLATION PROCEDURE	16
ATTACHMENT 4 - SUMMARY OF TEST RESULTS	22
ATTACHMENT 5 - VEHICLE DRIVEABILITY	89

-------
                                       65
                           NOTICE OF DISCLAIMER                                           i
                                                                                          1
The data in this report was accumulated between June 9, 1979 and
July 7, 1979.  EG&G Automotive Research, Inc. certifies that the
data presented herein was" generated- in—accordance with the. procedures
and methods stated or referred to in this report.

EG&G Automotive Research, Inc. does not infer or make conclusions as
to the performance of the device tested and does not endorse the
product in any way, manner, or form.

Reference is hereby made to the agreement between Auto-Miser Interna-
tional and EG&G-AR dated June 19, 1979 regarding the use of the data
herein and/or references to or use of the EG&G-AR trademark.
     s&g-p

-------
                                       66
                                  FORWARD

The enclosed data were accumulated by EG&G Automotive Research, Inc. between
June 9, 1979 and July 7, 1979 at the request of Mr. Randall Johnson, Presi-
dent of Auto-Miser International.
                                                          'r3--
Mr. R. T. Allin, Product Manager of Auto-Miser International acted as Auto-
Miser's on-site representative and supervised the installations and removals
of the devices in all test vehicles.

Overall supervision and coordination of the project was performed by Mr.
Maurice Forshee, Project Supervisor, Power Systems Research and Development.
                                     XI

-------
       67
PROGRAM SUMMARY

-------
                                        68
                    FUEL ECONOMY AND EXUAUST EMISSIONS
                      EVALUATION USING THREE VEHICLES
                       FOR AUTO-MISER INTERNATIONAL

TEST PROCEDURE
In accordance with the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
Emission Control Device Evaluation Test Policy, a proposed test scope was
generated by EG&G Automotive Research, Inc. (EG&G-AR) and submitted to
Mr. Randall Johnson, President of Auto-Miser International, for his approval.

After Mr. Johnson had reviewed and approved the test scope, it was forwarded
to Mr. Ralph Stahman, Emissions Control Technology Division of the EPA, for
that agency's review and comments.

On May 30, 1979, Mr. F. Peter Hutchins, Project Manager of EPA Technology
Assessment and Evaluation Branch responded to the proposed scope and made
some suggested changes in a letter to Mr. Johnson with a carbon copy to Mr.
Albert Naegelin, Business Cell Manager.of EG&G-AR's Power Systems Research
and Development Chassis Dynamometer Laboratory.
                             *

These suggested changes were incorporated in the test program and copies of
both the original test scope and Mr. Hutchins' comments are included as
Attachment 1 of this report.
I
TEST VEHICLES
Three vehicles were selected and delivered to EG&G-AR by Auto-Miser Interna-
tional.  The vehicle specifications are as follows:
                                                          Engine  Transmission
                                                           1.8 L    4.Speed
                                                                    Manual
                                                           2.3 L   Automatic
                                                           5.0 L   Automatic
Vehicle
Number
05
33
73
Make/Model
Chevrolet
Chevette
Ford/Pinto
Ford
Fairmont
Year
1977
1979
1979
Vehicle
Identification
1B08E7Y155251
9T10Y146233
9K92F187551
Odometer
11,336
7,377
400

-------
           AR Project No. 79091
           July 13, 1979  .
           Page 2
69
           TUNE-UP
           Each vehicle was tuned-up to manufacturer's specifications (including idle
           mixture screw settings) and the following parts were replaced:
                      Spark plugs
                      Ignition wires
                      Air cleaners
       Rotors
       Distributor caps
       Fuel filters*
           TESTING SERIES         .  -    .	
           This section of the report lists the individual vehicles and outlines the
           complete series of tests, adjustments, changes, evaluations, etc. that were
           performed on each unit.

           Vehicle No. 73 - 1979 Ford Fairmont
           1.  Received vehicle and performed complete inspection and tune-up (Attach-
               ment 2) .
           2.  Performed duplicate tests using Federal Test Procedure 40 CFR, Part 86
               and 40 CFR, Part 400 to evaluate vehicle emissions and determine city
               and highway fuel economies (Attachment 4).
           3.  Conducted catalytic converter efficiency test at 0, 30, and 50 MPH
               (Attachment 4).
           4.  Performed driveability evaluations (Attachment 5).
           5.  Installed the device in accordance with the written instructions supplied
               by Auto-Miser International (Attachment 3).  After the physical instal-
               lation was completed, Mr. Allin instructed EG&G-AR personnel to adjust
               the idle mixture screws one-half turn leaner (in) on both screws.  No
               change in curb or fast idle RPM occurred.  In accordance with the test
               procedure, this change made additional testing necessary after the
               test device series.
           6.  Performed duplicate tests using Federal Test Procedure 40 CFR, Part 86
               and 40 CFR Part 400 to evaluate vehicle emissions and determine city and
               highway fuel economies (Attachment 4).
           7.  Conducted catalytic converter efficiency test at 0, 30, and 50 MPH (At-
               tachment 4).
           8.  Performed driveability evaluation (Attachment 5).
           9.  Disconnected the device from the engine.
           *Fuel filters  were not readily available from local dealers for vehicle
            numbers 05 and 73 and replacement was not done.  The fuel filter for 05
            was changed at a later date.
3

-------
i     .       •                              70'
'           AR Project No. 79091
           July 13, 1979
!           Page 3
j

i           Vehicle No. 73 - 1979 Ford Fairmont  (Continued)

           10.  Performed duplicate tests using Federal Test Procedure 40 CFR, Part 86
                and 40 CFR, Part 400 to evaluate vehicle emissions and determine city
;                and highway fuel economies  (Attachment 4).

:           11.  Performed driveability evaluation  (Attachment 5).

:                                             • '
\           Vehicle No. 33 - 1979 Ford Pinto

            1.  Received vehicle and performed complete inspection and tune-up
|                (Attachment 2)".    "      ------  :

            2.  Performed duplicate tests using Federal Test Procedure 40 CFR, Part 86
                and 40 CFR, Part 400 to evaluate vehicle emissions and determine city
j                and highway fuel economies  (Attachment 4).

            3.  Conducted catalytic converter efficiency test at 0, 30, and 50 MPH
                (Attachment 4).
i
i
j            4.  Performed driveability evaluation  (Attachment 5).

            5.  Installed the device in accordance with the written instructions supplied
                by Auto-Miser International (Attachment 3).  After the installation, idle
                RPM was increased by 100.  The idle speed was adjusted down but after a
                few minutes at idle the RPM dropped by 100 and the idle speed setting
I                was returned to its original position.  No adjustments were made to any
                engine operating parameters and additional tests were not required on
                this vehicle.

I            6.  Performed duplicate tests using Federal Test Procedure 40 CFR, Part 86
|                and 40 CFR, Part 400 to evaluate vehicle emissions and determine city
                and highway fuel economies  (Attachment 4).
[            7.  Conducted catalytic converter efficiency test at 0, 30, and 50 MPH (At-
J        ,        taehment 4) .

            8.  Performed driveability evaluation  (Attachment 5).

1
           Vehicle No. 05 - 1977 Chevrolet Chevette

            !1.  Received vehicle and performed complete inspection and tune-up (Attach-
                ment 2).

            2.  Performed duplicate tests using Federal Test Procedure 40 CFR, Part 86
>                and 40 CFR, Part 400 to evaluate vehicle emissions and determine city
                and highway fuel economies  (Attachment 4).

,            3.  Conducted catalytic converter efficiency test at 0, 30, and 50 MPH
I                (Attachment 4).

            4.  Performed driveability evaluation  (Attachment 5).

f            5.  Installed the device in accordance with the written instructions supplied
i                by Auto-Miser International (Attachment 3).  No changes were made to the
                engine operating parameters and curb and fast idle RPM remained at the
I                manufacturer's recommended speeds.

-------
                                 71
 AR Project No. 79091
 July 13, 1979
 Page 4


 Vehicle No. 05 - 1977 Chevrolet Chevette (Continued)

 6.  Performed duplicate tests using Federal Test Procedure 40 CFR, Part 86
     and 40 CFR, Part 400 to evaluate vehicle emissions and determine city
     and highway fuel economies  (Attachment 4).

 7.  Conducted catalytic converter efficiency test at 0, 30, and 50 MPH
     (Attachment 4).

 8.  Performed driveability evaluation (Attachment 5).

 9.  The last test in the duplicate series (test number 04) showed consider-
     ably different results from the preceeding test^(number 03) and indica-
     ted a possible vehicre~probieiiu

     Per Mr. Allin's instructions, the vehicle was removed from soak and
     a complete check of the vehicle was performed.  The fuel line from the
     tank to the fuel pump was leaking and the line was replaced.  A new
     fuel filter was also installed.  During the check the curb idle speed
     was found to be high and erratic.  Numerous attempts were made to adjust
     the idle speed,  but it would not remain steady.  Mr. Allin's instructions
     were to adjust the idle mixture screw three-fourths of a turn richer
     (out) .  This was accomplished and the curb and fast idle RPMs were reset
     to manufacturer's specifications.  Both vacuum control screws on the
     device cannister were turned to verify proper operation of the device
     by Mr. Allin.  When proper operation was verified, the screws were re-
     turned to verify proper operation of the device by Mr. Allin.  When
     proper operation was  verified the screws were returned to their ori-
     ginal settings.   No instruments or vacuum gauges were used to complete
     this check.  Because of the numerous changes and repairs made to this
     vehicle, the results from tests 03 and 04 were considered questionable
     and additional tests were required.
10.  Performed single test using Federal Test Procedure 40 CFR, Part 86 and
     40 CFR, Part 400 to evaluate vehicle emissions and determine city and
     highway fuel economies (Attachment 4).
     After Mr. Allin reviewed the results of this test, he instructed EG&G-AR
     personnel to return the idle mixture screw to its original position
     (three-fourths of a turn leaner (in)).  No change in curb or fast idle
     RPMs occurred.
11.  Test numbers 06 and 07 were aborted due to wrong inertia load setting.

12.  Performed duplicate test (number 08 and 10 - 09 was aborted due to load
     selector switch being in the wrong mode at start of test) using Federal
     Test Procedure 40 CFR, Part 86 and 40 CFR, Part 400 to evaluate vehicle
     emissions and determine city and highway fuel economies  (Attachment 4).
13.  Performed driveability evaluation (Attachment 5).
14.  Disconnected the device from the engine.

15.  Performed duplicate tests using Federal Test Procedure 40 CFR, Part 86
     and 40 CFR, Part 400 to evaluate vehicle emissions and determine city
     and highway fuel economies  (Attachment 4).
                                                            *
16.  Due to a misunderstanding in the work schedule, this vehicle was returned
     to Auto-Miser before the driveability evaluation was accomplished.

-------
AR Project No.' 79091           72
July 13, 1979
Page 5


At completion of all testing, the devices were reconnected and the vehicles
returned to Auto-Miser International.  Data obtained during testing was
audited and compiled for the final report.

-------
  73
ATTACHMENT 1



 TEST SCOPE

-------
                                          74
                                      PROPOSED TEST SCOPE
               1.  Vehicle  Procurement

                  Three vehicles  will be  procured.   These vehicles will be specified
                  by the device manufacturer as to  make,  model,  engine displacement,
                  carburetion, model  year,  transmission and any  particulars as to
                  optional equipment.

               2.  Vehicle  Tune-up

                  Each vehicle will be tuned-up to  vehicle manufacturers specifications
                  including but not limited to, spark plugs,  ignition wires,  distributor
                  cap, rotor  (points  and  condenser  if applicable), curb idle  RPM,
                  basic timing and an inspection of all emission control components
                  for operation.

               3.  Vehicle  Baseline Testing

                  Each vehicle will be tested a minimum of two times using Federal
                  Test Procedures (40 CFR Part 86)  to evaluate vehicle emissions and
                  Highway  Fuel Economy Test (40 CFR Part 400).

               4.  Device Installation

                  After the baseline  tests  are audited and are determined valid
                  and the  vehicles are considered acceptable (pass emission standards
                  for that year model and test results repeat) the vehicles will be
                  turned over to  the  device manufacturer for device installation.
                                          ,'.*•••
               5.  Tests After Device  ••Installation   >

                  After the device is installed and any necessary adjustments are
                  made the vehicle will receive a minimum of two tests in accordance
                  with Federal Test Procedure  (40 CFR Part 86) to evaluate emissions
                  and Highway Fuel Economy  Tests (40 CFR Part 400).  These tests
                  will be  audited and'when  determined valid this phase of testing
                  will be  complete.
                                  , .-O'Viis:'1 •'•?*<:'•-'•.'— •."ป•••:ป/ •;•:-..-
               6.  Additional  Tests

                  If any test vehicle engine parameters (such as ignition timing or
                  idle mixture) are changed from the original manufacturers specifica-
                  tions the vehicle will  receive a  minimum of two tests with the
                  equivalent  changes  to engine parameters without the device install-
                  ed.  These  tests will be  conducted in accordance with Federal Test
                  Procedure (40 CFR Part  86) to evaluate emissions and Highway Fuel
                  Economy  Test  (40 CFR Part 400).
f
L

-------
                             75
Page 2
Proposed Test Scope
7.  Driveability

    The vehicles will be evaluated for acceleration, cold start
    performance, tendency to stumble or hesitate, surge and hot
    start performance.  This evaluation will be completed on all
    phases of testing.^- . — ,-,—ซ.•,  /

8.  Final Report

    The final report will include test results and any information
    necessary to show how the results were obtained.  EG&G Automotive
    Research will not make any assumptions or comments regarding the
    performance of the device.

This proposed test scope was prepared by:
Albert Naegelin     "• —  >                  Date
Business Cell Manager
Power Systems Research & Development
Emissions Testing         x

Randy Johnson /7
Approved by:
                                           Date
EPA Representative                         Date

-------
                         76
                                                                   8
  •i
  $    UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
 rf                   ANN ARBOR. MICHIGAN
                                                    AIH A NO AA1C.U (>>><• >GH A M
May 30, 1979
Mr. Randall W. Johnson, President
Auto Miser International'-—- - '•
2570 Gravel Street
Fort Worth, Texas  76118

Dear Mr. Johnson:

This is in response to your May 18, 1979 letter seeking EPA evaluation
and approval of the test project which is planned for the evaluation of
your device.  The EPA will comment and make suggestions on the proposed
plan.  We cannot, however, approve this plan.

The following comments are made without any knowledge of the operational
characteristics of the device and, therefore, without any way of anticipating
its effect on test results and test variability.

     a.   As these are the first set of FTP and HFET tests which are to
     be performed on the device, the overall scope of the test project
     (3 vehicles with duplicate baseline, device and parameter adjusted,
     if required, tests) appears to be a reasonable compromise between
     cost and size of the data base.

     b.   I cannot comment on what vehicles should be selected because
     of lack of information on either the device or its anticipated
     sales applicability.

     c.   EG&G must follow manufacturer procedures for setting idle
     air/fuel ratio and must record levels.  If vehicles are catalyst
     and/or air pump equipped, tailpipe readings do not adequately
     identify carburetor settings.                                        ,_ __

     d.   If any vehicle manufacturer settings or specification of the
     basic vehicle are in any way altered when the device is installed,
     the vehicle must be tested in this parameter adjusted mode.  This
     set of tests permits identification of the effects of the parameter
     adjustment separately from the effects of the device.  All of these

-------
                                         77
                    (if  any)  adjustments  must  be  recorded.  When  the vehicles  are
I                    returned  to EG&G following device  installation, EG&G must  inspect
•                    and  record  all  parameters  as  scheduled  in  the baseline  inspection.

                    Ie.    The  same fuel  must  be used  in all  tests  of each vehicle.   Fuel
                    used must be appropriate for  the vehicle in which  it is used.

.               Enclosed  with  this letter  is  a  copy of  the "EPA Retrofit and Emission
}               Control Device Evaluation  Test  Policy"  and the  "Application  Format  for
1               Use with  Fuel  Economy Retrofit  Device Evaluation under  Section  511  of
               the Energy Policy ajid Conservation Act".

'               Sincerely,
                             X   ซ
               F.  Peter Hutchins,  Project Manager
               Technology Assessment and Evaluation Branch

               cc:  Albert Naegelin, EG&G

               Enclosure

-------
           IO
         ATTACHMENT 2



VEHICLE INSPECTION AND TUNE-UP

-------
                                        79                                         10
I
                               VEHICLE INSPECTION AND TUNE-UP
                                  AUTO-MISER INTERNATIONAL
                                    AR PROJECT NO. 79091

       Vehicle No.;     05	      •             Odometer;   11,336.3
       Make/Model;     Chevrolet/Chevette                  Date:	June 9,  1979
       3.  Install new spark plugs (torque to specs.).
       4.  Install new air cleaner.
       5.  Install new ignition cables.
       6.  Install new distributor cap.
       7.  Install new rotor.
       8.  Install new fuel filter*
       9.  Check ignition system with oscilloscope and record the
           following:
           Available coil voltage;   18K
           Spark plug voltage:	4K
      10.  Engine timing:
           Vacuum advance disconnected and plugged at idle:	8
           Vacuum advance disconnected and plugged at 2500 RPM; 10ฐ
      11.  Check battery for proper condition and charge.
      12.  Check choke for proper operation.
      13.  Check for proper operation of EGR valve.
      14.  Check all belts and hoses.
      16.  Check and insure that the air cleaner thermostat valve
           control operation is satisfactory.

      *Fuel filter replaced June 26, 1979
                                                                              Work
                                                                            Completed
       1.  Road test vehicle for satisfactory operation.                        x	
       2.  Check cylinder compression and record:
           No. 1;   180   No. 2;  175    No. 3;  170   No. 4:  175
           No. 5:	  No. 6:	  No. 7:        No. 8:                     X
           Vacuum advance connected at 2500 RPM:                49ฐ            X
      15.  Check vacuum hoses for proper routings and insure that
           there are no vacuum leaks.                                           X

-------
!      .                               "   80
ฃ     Vehicle Inspection and Tune-up                                               11
      Auto-Miser International
f     Page 2                                                                       •
'                                                                             Work
                                                                            Completed
1     17.  Check all_ fluid levels and bring to full.
           Coolant:	X	          Power Steering:	X	
f          Brakes:	X              Battery:	X
           Engine Oil;  X                                                       X
      118.  Check idle RPMs and set to manufacturer's specifications:
             800  RPM.
,     19.  Check fast idle RPM and~set—to~fflanufacturer's specifications:
I           2400  RPM.                                                          X
\
      20.  Set idle mixture screws per manufacturer's recommended
           procedure.
      21.  Recheck idle and fast RPMs and reset to manufacturer's
           specifications as necessary.
      22.  Remove rear tires and brake drums and inspect rear brakes.
                                              Technician's signature:
                                                      June 9, 1979

-------
                                        81                                       12
                              VEHICLE INSPECTION AND TUNE-UP
                                 AUTO-MISER INTERNATIONAL
                                   AR PROJECT NO. 79091
      Vehicle No. ;    73	                   Odometer:    400.0	    .
ป      Make/Model;    Ford/Fairmont                        Date:_	June 9,  1979
                                          _                                  Work
I                             "   "        '" • "'                 *              Completed
\                                                                           ~
      1.  Road test vehicle for satisfactory operation.                       X
      2.  Check cylinder compression and record:
          No. 1:  150   No. 2:  160    No. 3:  160   No. 4:  165
          No. 5:  170   No. 6;  160    No. 7;  165   No. 8;   155
      3.  Install new spark plugs (torque to specs.).
     15.  Check vacuum hoses for proper routings and insure that
          there are no vacuum leaks.
     16.  Check and insure that the air cleaner thermostat valve
          control operation is satisfactory.
      4.  Install new air cleaner.                                         	X_
      5.  Install new ignition cables,                                     	X_
      6.  Install new distributor cap.                                     	X_
      7.  Install new rotor.                                                  X
      8.  Install new fuel filter.                                            No
      9.  Check ignition system with oscilloscope and record the
          following:
          Available coil voltage:	15K
          Spark plug voltage:	4K                                      X
     10.  Engine timing:
          Vacuum advance disconnected and plugged at idle:	8
          Vacuum advance disconnected and plugged at 2500 RPM;  20
                                                                  o
          Vacuum advance connected at 2500 RPM:	   54            X
     11.  Check battery for proper condition and charge.                      X
     12.  Check choke for proper operation.                                   X
     13.  Check for proper operation of EGR valve.                            X
     14.  Check all belts and hoses.                                       	X

-------
  3'               '                    "'  82
  I    Vehicle  Inspection and Tune-up                                               13
      Auto-Miser  International
  t    Page  2
 /                                                                             Work
 /                                                                            Completed
 /
 r
 I     17.   Check  all fluid  levels  and bring to full.
 4
            Coolant:	x              Power Steering;     x	
            Brakes:	x              Battery;   	x	
            Engine Oil;   X
      18.   Check idle RPMs  and  set to manufacturer's specifications:
              750 RPM.
      19.   Check fast idle  RPM" and ~SBt trrffia-nufacturer 's specifications:
              N/A* RPM.
      20.   Set idle mixture screws per manufacturer's recommended
            procedure.
      21.   Recheck idle  and fast  RPMs and reset  to manufacturer's
            specifications as necessary.
      22.   Remove rear tires and  brake drums and inspect rear brakes.

                                               Technician's Siignatuare:
                                               Date:    June 9, 1979
       *Not entered
'\

-------
                                    83
                                                                             14
                         VEHICLE INSPECTION AND TUNE-UP
                            AUTO-MISER INTERNATIONAL
                              AR PROJECT NO. 79091
 Vehicle No.:
 Make/Model :
               33
              Ford/Pinto
Odomebsr:
Date:
7,377.0
                                                                June 10,  1979
 3.
 4.
 5.
 6.
 7.
 8.
10.
     Road test vehicle for satisfactory operation.
     Check cylinder compression and record:
     No.  1;   160   No. 2;   170   No.  3: 150    No.  4;
     No .  5 :        No. 6 :         No .  7 :        No .  8 ;
                                                      155
    Install new spark plugs (torque to specs.).
    Install new air cleaner.
    Install new ignition cables.
    Install new distributor cap.
    Install new rotor.
    Install new fuel filter.
9.  Check ignition system with oscilloscope and record the
    following:
    Available coil voltage:  UK
    Spark plug voltage:	
    Engine timing:
                               4K
     Vacuum advance disconnected and plugged at idle:
                                                          20'
     Vacuum advance disconnected and plugged at 2500 RPM;   24
     Vacuum advance connected at 2500 RPM:                  40'
11.  Check battery for proper condition and charge.
12.  Check choke for proper operation.
13.  Check for proper operation of EGR valve.
14.  Check all belts and hoses.
15.  Check vacuum hoses for proper routings and insure that
     there are no vacuum leaks.
16.  Check and insure that the air cleaner thermostat valve
     control operation is satisfactory.
                                                                        Work
                                                                      Completed
                      X
                                                                          No

-------
                                        84
•Jj
     Vehicle Inspection and Tune-up
     Auto-Miser International
     Page 2
     17.
          Check all .fluid  levels  and  bring  to  full.

          Coolant;     x               Power Steering:

          Brakes: _ X               Battery:

          Engine Oil:  y
                     •-• •  -- --
     18.
     19.
      20.
     21
     22
          Check  idle  RPMs  and  set  to  manufacturer's specif ications:
            600  RPM.        ..     __  __,.—.  :
          -
          Check  fast  idle  RPM  and  set to manufacturer's specifications:
          _21p_p__ RPM.

          Set  idle mixture screws  per manufacturer's recommended
          procedure.

          Recheck idle  and fast  RPMs  and reset  -to manufacturer's
          specifications as necessary.

          Remove rear tires and  brake drums and inspect rear brakes.
                                                                                   15
                                                                              Work
                                                                            Completed
!B
                                              Technician's signature:
                                              Date:   June 9, 1979

-------
          85
          ATTACPIMENT 3



AUTO-MISER INSTALLATION PROCEDURE

-------
                                       86
rf
                                                   Proper operation  of the "AUTO-MISER"
                                                 gasoline saving system can  only be obtained
                                                 by a complete understanding of the  theory,
                                                 operation, installation and diagnostic infor-
                                                  mation included in tne            .
                                                   Attention tง tHงse instruq^pn/vyiii result
                                                 in a cieanei'..  n-iors responsive engine  jrj all
                                                 operating rang^i. Thซ conservative use of these
                                                 increased responsiveness shpuid resui't in fuel
                                                 savings.
                                                             fe.!>!S-T?^ฃlAlง8sW:iซsSiป!i.SKJt-.

AUTO-MISER IS A PRODUCT OF
  AUTO-MISER INTERNATIONAL MANUFACTURING CORP.
  2570 GRAVEL STREET
  FORT WORTH, TEXAS 76118   817-284-1425 ,

-------
                                              87
  THEORY OF OPERATION
 -  Vaporized gasoline mixed with the gasoline mist
"Slnd air supphed  by the carburetor  will improve
  ignition of the total mixture and more complete
Combustion m  the engine  rather  than  in the
 Iphaust system.
 ;   As a result, build up of  residue in the combus-
  tion chamber  is  reduced,  which prolongs  spark
j-Jlug, valve and ring life. This reduction in cylinder
 /deposits reduces pre-combustion "ping" and the
  build-up of octane requirements.
 SYSTEM OPERATION
    The entire system js vacuum operated with the
 vacuum source  taken  at  the Positive Crankcase
 Ventilation (PCV) valve hose. This vacuum is used
 to draw gasoline and air into a vaporizing chamber.
 The gasoline is vaporized and mixed with air in the
 vaporizing  chamber  and  drawn into the engine
 through the hose between the PCV valve and base
 of the carburetor.
    The gasoline is taken from the fuel supply line
 to the engine  fuel pump  (suction  side) through a
 filter and drawn into the vaporizing chamber. The
 amouซปt--of fuel  is controlled by a float and valve
 in the chamber.
    A porous pad in the bottom of the vaporizing
 chamber is immersed in this fuel.
    Air  i?  drawn  into' the vaporizing chamber
 through a filter and  into the vaporizing pad where
 it'produces vaporized gasoline.  The amount of air
 and the vacuum in the chamber is controlled by an
 air inlet control screw located under the air filter
 retaining cap screw.
    The  mixture of  vaporized gasoline and  air is
 drawn into the vapor supply hose through an anti-
  backfire check  valve and flow control adjusting
 screw. The amount of vapor delivered to the engine
  is controlled by this adjusting screw.
    A spring loaded  disc  valve  is  located at the
 bottom ot the vaporizing chamber. This is a one-
 way drain valve permitting only a small amount of
 fuel  to be drained from the unit when the engine
 stops. The spring force (fixed)  pre-determines the
 amount of fuel drained back into the fuel line. The
  purpose of this action is to provide a fresh supply
 of gasoline  for vaporizing each time the engine is
 started. The spring-loading also  prevents any back-
 flow of fuel  into the vaporizing  chamber if the
 vehicle is  parked with the fuel tank above the
 chamber.
 SYSTEM CON t,ujL
   Since  the operation  of  the  system is vacuum
 actuated,  the  amount  of vacuum  and flow  is
 controlled by the vapor  adjustment screw and inlet
 air adjustment  screw. Botli these adjustments are
 made at installation and  should not be changed.
   The purpose of  the vapor adjustment screw is to
 match the vapor flow from the unit to the amount
 of  vacuum  avoil.iWf  from the  enyine. The  larger
 the engine, the mQrซ flow fram the ynit. Also this
 adjustment is matte to limit the amt-iutU of vacuum
 taken from thfe t.Migine so as not to adversely effect
 the PCV valve operation.
   The air   inlet  adjustment  screw  controls the
 amount of  air taken into the vaporizing chamber
 which in turn  determines the  vacuum  in the
 chamber. This adjustment serves several purposes:
   1.   Amount of vacuum in'the chamber deter-
       mines the v/aporizing action.
   2.   Vacuum in  the chamber determines amount
       of force available to lift  fuel from the fuel
       line into the vaporizing chamber.
   3.   Vacuum has an effect on the  buoyancy of
       the float; therefore on the fuel level.
PRE-INSTALLAT1ON CHECKS
  This  system  requires  the  following  vehicle
configurations   to   exist   before   attempting
installation:
  1,   Carburetor  — NOT fuel injection or diesel.
  2.   Engine-mounted  fuel pump — NOT tank-
       mounted fuel pump.
  3.   PCV valve.
  With  the  engine  at  operating temperature.
connect and  calibrate an emissions analyzer and
record emissions  at  idle and  at  approximately
2500 RPM. Check for lean misfire due to vacuum
leaks, carburetor  malfunction, electrical  misfire
and  timing.  Adjust  and correct as  necessary to
vehicle   manufacturer's   specifications.   These
specifications can  be found  at various  locations
under the hood. Check PCV valve for clean appear-
ance  and  proper  operation,  (Refer  to  "Trouble
Shooting") if any doubt of valve condition, replace.
If used over 10,000  miles, replace with  OEM
specified parts.
  Check hoses to and  from  fuel pump for tight
connections and hose condition. Locate  suction
line  from  fuel tank and determine  vapor chamber
mounting location  as close to fuel pump as possible.
PRE-INSTALLATIQN UNIT ASSEMBLY
   Included in the "AUTO-MISER" packaging is a
round  AUTOMATIC DRAIN VALVE. This valve
has a  1/8"  NPT fitting on one end  and a 1/4"
barbed fitting on the other. This is to be installed
into the fitting provided on the bottom of the vapor
chamber.  Removal  of  the red  Caplug on  drain
valve and seai caps is required.

-------
    2.
i
    3.
    4.
•IB
•8

•51
•an
         b.
         C.
         d.
         b.

         b.
         b.
SYSTEM INSTALLATION               88
1.    Determine  best  location for  vjpor chamber
     using these general rules. (Refer to Figure 1)
     a.   Chamber must be mounted vertical.
         Keep chamber close to but above engine
         fuel pump.
         Provide  clearance   from  any  moving
         engine parts such as fans and belts.
         Allow sufficient room  for  system fuel
         and vapor hoses.
     Pre-assemble system fuel supply hose.
     a.   Install the 3/8" x  1/4"  x 3/8" tee pro-
         vided on the 1/4"  fuel  hose using red
         hose clamp.
         Cut the  hose about 3" to 5"  from the
         tee. This measurement will vary depend-
         ing upon space available from the suction
         hose of the engine  fuel pump  to ttie
         bottom of the vapor chamber:"    "'
    c.   Install the  white  1/4" x  1/4" x 1/4"
         tee in the fuel hose using  red hose clamps.
         Install open end of fuel hose on remain-
         ing  1/4" connection on tee and clamp
         with red hose clamp.
     Install fuel supply hose.
    a.   Cut fuel suction  hose  to  engine fuel
         pump preferably in center of hose being
         certain installed hose will clear all engine
         and frame parts.
         Install previously assembled 3/8" x 1/4"
         x  3/8" tee  on  1/4" hose to engine fuel
         hose using green hose clamps.
     Vapor Chamber.
    a.   Position vapor  chamber vertically and
         locate mounting wire hanger. Drill  or
         punch  two  1/8"  diameter  holes for
         mounting screws.
         Caution: Vapor chamber  must be vertical
         and fuel inlet elbow must be positioned
         toward outside  of  the vehicle. Also  be
         certain vapor chamber and hoses will not
         be affected in the event of broken belts.
         Mount vapor chamber in wire support.
         Route 1/4" fuel supply hose to the fuel
         inlet elbow on top. of the vapor chamber.
         Leave room  in hose routing to clear
         existing hoses or vacuum lines and cut  to
         length at fuel inlet elbow.
         Cut hose between  1/4"  x 1/4" x 1/4"
         tee  previously installed  and  fuel inlet
         elbow  connection   for  installation   of
         fuel filter. Locate filter so it will be close
         to a vertical position.
         Install fuel  filter  with arrow on filter
         pointed toward fuel inlet elbow using red
         hose clamps.
         DO NOT  connect  fuel  hose to inlet
         elbow at this time. Install red clamp over
         open   hose  and    plug   open  end
         temporarily.
         Using remaining 1/4" hose, measure and
         cut to length  for  connection to drain
         valve in bottom of vapor chamber. When
         measuring hose provide sufficient length
         to avoid any side pull or strain on drain
         valve. Install hose using red hose clamps.
         b.
         c.
         d.
         e.
         f.
                                                                           AUTO-MISER INSTALLATION KIT
A    '! Vaporizing Chamber

B    1 Pre-formed Wire Support

C    1 1/4"x42" Fuel Hose

D    1 3/8" x 42" Vapor Hose

E    1 Hardware Package, with

     F   1 Drain Valve


     G   1 Fuel Filter

     H   81/4" Red Hose Clamps


     I  ' 6 3/8" Green Hose Clamps


     j   2 Mounting Screws

     K   3/8" x 3/8" x 3/8" Vapor Tee


     L   3/8" x 1 /4" x 3/8" Fuel Tee
                   ^	 --•'

-------
                                               89
^ 5.   Vapor Hose
       a.    Locate   dose  connecting  PCV   valve
_.          (usually  located on engine valve cover)
jl          iind the  engine intake manifold or car
1          buretor base.
       b.    Cut hose 3" to 5" away from the engine
,ซ          manifold or carburetor base fitting.  Note:
I          Keeping  the  connection  close  to the
            engine provides  optimum system  per-
            formance.
[*     c.    Install 3/8" x 3/8" x 3/8" white tee in
H;          vapor hose and connect into engine PCV
            hose using three green hose clamps.  Note:
            Avoid thermostat housings  and  other
j          known hot spots.
:a     d.    Route hose to vapor control valve on top
            of  vapor  chamber  and cut  to  length.
ujj          CAUTION:  When locating vapor troSeT
,ij          avoid possible broken belt damage.
       e.    Install green clamp over cut end of vapor
            hose. DO NOT connect to vapor control
'"I          vaive at thris time.
SYSTEM CALIBRATION
     Two adjustments are required to match  the
system to the engine requirements.
     1.   Adjustment  in  the Vapor  Flow Screw
         located  beneath the black  seal cap on
         top of the vapor chamber.
     2.   Adjustment in Vapor Chamber Vacuum
         Screw located under the inlet air filter
         cap retaining screw.
Both of these screws require a 1/8" hex  set screw
wrench.
           The  vapor chamber is shipped with
           the vapor  adjustment screw  in  the
           closed position and the vacuum adjust-
           ment screw in the wide open position.
 •1

15
       Note:
1
                       Vacuum
                        Gauge

       Vapor Flow Adjustment
       a.    Insert a 3/8" x 1/4" x 3/8" tee into the
            open end of the vapor hose.
       b.    Use a  short length o* 3/8" vapor hose
     and insert between  the  3/8"  x 1/4" x
     3/8" tee and the vapor control valve on
     top of the vapor chamber.
c.    Connect a well calibrated vacuum gauge
     to the remaining 1/4" connection on the
     3/8" x 1/4" x 3/8" tee.
d.    Remove black, seal cap from top of vapor
     control valve and be certain vapor adjust-
     ment screw is closed.
e.    Start engine; allow  to  reach  operating
     temperature.
f.    Observe  vacuum reading - normally be-
     tween 16" and 20".
     Caution:  If less than 16" of vacuum is
              observed prior  to adjusting the
              vapor  control valve, the engine
              may be in a marginal condition
              for   the  installation.   Any
              vacuum   leak   should   be
              corrected  or  out of  balance
              idle mixture  screws  adjusted
              before  continuing  with  the
              installation.
g.    With engine  running at  idle, open vapor
     adjustment screw (turn counterclockwise)
     until a 4" reduction in vacuum reading is
     reached. Example: If the original vacuum
     reading  is  20", open  vapor  adjusting
     until vacuum drops to 16".
h.    Remove  vacuum gauge  and  tee  and
     connect vapor  hose to  vapor control
     valve using green hose clamp.
i.    Insert seal cap into, top of vapor valve to
     discourage tampering with vapor adjust-
     ment screw.

-------
     Vapor Chamber Vac/.-. ~  Adjustment          90
     a.   Connect well calibrated vacuum gauge to
         fuel inlet elbow on top of vapor chamber.
         NOTE:  Be  certain  open  end  of 1/4"
         fuel supply hose is plugged.
     b.   Remove  screw and cap  from top of
         inlet  air  filter  to   provide  access to
         vacuum adjustment screw.
     c.   With  engine running, close (turn clock-
         wise)  vacuum adjustment screw until a
         vacuum reading of 2" minimum to 2 1/2"
         maximum is observed.
         NOTE: This vacuum reading is required
         to insure, proper fuel level and vaporiza-
         tion.  An  accurate  vacuum gauge  is a
         MUST.
     d.   Disconnect vacuum gauge, remove plug
         from  fuel supply hose and connect hose
         to chamber inlet fuel  elbow.—Do -not~~- - r
         damp at  this point as  a  recheck of
         vacuum will be necessary after 3-5 min.
         wfle time.  Emissions will be erratic for a
         few minutes while chamber fills with
         fuel.
SYSTEM ADJUSTMENTS
     Allow engine to idle several minutes to reach
operating temperature and fill vapor chamber with
fuel.  During  this  period the  engine  speed  will
increase due  to  the vaporization of fuel starting
to occur in the vapor chamber.
     Connect a calibrated emissions analyzer and
observe hydrocarbon (HC)  and carbon monoxide
(C.O.).  They  will  vary  as  chamber  fills.  When
emissions  are steady, the chamber has filled and
adjustment may be made.
     1.   Adjust carburetor  idle mixture screw(s)
         for  lowest  hydrocarbon  (HC) reading
         without a lean misfire.
         CAUTION:  On vehicles with  catalytic
         converters a lean  misfire may occur even
         with low  HC reading. Look for an even,
         smooth idle as well as low HC reading.
     2.    Readjust  idle  speed to vehicle  manu-
         facturer's   specifications  shown   on
         emission data/tune up label located under
         the hood in the engine compartment.
     3.    Record emissions at  idle and at approxi-
         mately  2500  RPM  before  and after
         system installation and save for  record
         purposes.
     4.    Final adjustment is  to  recheck position
         of  the vapor  chamber.  The  chamber
         should be positioned so the fuel inlet is
          either right or left when facing the front
          of  the vehicle. The  vapor control valve
          and inlet  air filter  should  be parallel
          with  the  center line of the vehicle  and
          the fuel  inlet elbow  to the right or left
          toward the sHe(s) of  the vehicle.  This
          assures prooer  float/fuel va've operation
          undnr  heavy  braking or  acceleration
          conditions.
                  DISCLAIMER

    This manual contains certain  information con-
  cerning tlie installation and functional operation  of
  the AUTO-MISER  fuel saving system. Such informa-
  tion is be'ieved to be accurate and  is based upon the
  research   and   experience    of   AUTO-MISER
  International  Manufacturing Corporation. It  is be-
  lieved  that proper  application  of the  information
  contained in this manual to the types of automotive
  vehicles  discussed  herein will  result in  optimum
  performance  and  operating   efficiency  of the
  AUTO-MISER fuel saving system.
    NOTHING CONTAINED HEREIN IS INTENDED
  IN ANY WAY, TO MODIFY OR ENLARGE THE
  WARRANTY OF AUTO-MISER INTERNATIONAL
  MANUFACTURING   CORPORATION   AS  SET
  FORTH IN THE LIMITED WARRANTY GIVEN TO
  BUYER IN CONNECTION WITH THE  PURCHASE
  OF  AN AUTO-MISER  UNIT  AND  BUYER  IS
  REFERRED SUCH  LIMITED WARRANTY FOR A
  COMPLETE  STATEMENT OF ALL WARRANTIES
  GIVEN TO BUYER IN CONNECTION WITH  SUCH
  PURCHASE'                 :  :  •; -   ;;
    This manual has  been prepared solely for the use
  and benefit of authorized AUTO-MISER dealers and
  is not intended for  the use or benefit of any other
  person or entity. Any reproduction or distribution
  of this manual, in  whole or part, or  the divulgence
  of any of the information contained herein to any
  person or entity, without the express prior written
  authorization   of   AUTO-MISER  International
  Manufacturing Corporation, is strictly prohibited.
TROUBLE SHOOTING
1.    "Lost Gas Mileage" or "No Increase" claim.
     Look for:
     A.   Inaccurate base line
     B.   Vacuum source not adequate due to:
          1)   Clogged  carburetor ports  or  PCV
              valve
          2)   Non-functioning PCV valve
          3)   Improper vapor  valve  setting (Para.
              No. D
          4)   Improper vapor  chamber  vacuurr
              (Para. No. 2)
          5)   Improper fuel level
          6)   improper  combustion  or  wea!
              vacuum
          7)   Poor ignition, plugs, etc.
2.    Diagnosis and Remedies
     A.   Check fuel level in chamber - Should be
          4  oz.  to  5  oz.  (Para. No.  1  - No. 2 -
          System Calibration)
     8.   Recheck vacuum settings (Para. No.  1 -
          No. 2  System Calibration)
     C.   Check emissions for carburetor setting

3.    Excessive Hydrocarbons (HC)
     A.   lncorf?ct timing
     8.   Inco'fJCt dwell
     C.   3a^ '3^'r'O" ooints
     1:    "."'•• •'-•'. -r.vt  nlugs or S/P v;irec
     -    -         ':.  •.''j-y'y  indicated  by  very
          -...  ".''  -"M'-ic and  high   HC  reading.

-------
•f!
                                        91
        Excessive Carbon Monoxide Readings ICO)
        A.  Idle  speed  incorrect  •  cl.eck  manu-
            facturer's   specifications   and  adjust
            accordingly
            Dirty air  cleaner  or restriction  in air
            flow system
            Choke not operating properly
            PCV  system  not  operating  properly
            (replace  PCV  valve -  normal life is
            10,000 miles or per manufacturer's specs)
            To improve air/fuel  ratio,  reset  idle
            mixture screws after above checks
8.

C.
D.
E.
        Engine Surging or Racing at Idle (Wavering CO)
        A.  Check carburetor  float level  or  valve
            and seat condition.
        B.  Check fuel filter in gas line to carburetor
    6.   Misfire (Wavering HC)
        A.   Check engine ignition wiring
        B.   Check distributor cap
        C.   Check coil wire for oil on connector
        D.   Check dwell
        E.   Check points
                  NOTICE

        The installation instructions contained in
      this manual must be strictly followed in order
      to avoid a change in automotive emissions to
      a level in excess of that permitted by the
      Environmental Protection Agency and to allow
      maximum performance by the AUTO-MISER
      unit.
        The recommended procedures of the auto-
      mobile manufactureremust be followed with
      respect to carburetor and timing adjustments
      in  order  to achieve optimum benefit  of the
      AUTO-MISER  unit and to  avoid potential
      voiding of the  automobile  manufacturer's
      v/arranty.
        INSTALLATION OF ANY AUTO-MISER
      UNIT BY OTHER THAN AN AUTHORIZED
      AUTO-MISER  DEALER IS NOT  RECOM-
      MENDED.   INCORRECT INSTALLATION
      MAY  VOID   MANUFACTURER'S WAR
      RANTY.   REFER  TO STATEMENT  OF
      LIMITED  WARRANTY  PROVIDED  TO
      BUYER FOR COMPLETE STATEMENT OF
      WARRANTY AND LIMITATION OF MANU-
      FACTURER'S LIABILITY.
            LIMITED WARRANTY

AUTO-MISER  INTERNATIONAL MANUFAC
TURING   CORPORATION    ("Auto-Miser"),
warrants to tne  Buyer  that the Auto-Mis
-------
                                         92
                                         ATTACHMENT 4



                                    SUMMARY OF TEST RESULTS
1

-------
                                          93
                                SUMMARY  OF  CVS-CH/HFET TEST RESULTS

                                     AUTO-MISER INTERNATIONAL

                                       AR PROJECT  NO.  79091
    Vehicle No. 05 - 1977 Chevette
 *•* Test Number
    Test Date
 •9 Odometer
 * Phase I

    fHC - Grams/Phase
    CO - Grams/Phase
    NOx - Grams/Phase
    CO2 - Grams/Phase
 !|| Fuel Economy

    Phase II
 .•*:ป   ~~
 gj HC - Grams/Phase
 ^ CO - Grams/Phase
    NOx - Grams/Phase
 11 CO2 - Grams/Phase
 19 Fuel Economy

 m  Phase III

 M  EC - Grams/Phase
    CO - Grams/Phase
 gf  NOx  -  Grams/Phase
 ~jt.  C02  -  Grams/Phase
    Fuel  Economy
 ซ>
 •^:.
 .^jj  Vveighted Emissions
    HC -  Grams/Mile
 m  CO - Grams/Mile
 iff  NOx  -  Grams/Mile
    CO2  -  Grams/Mile

 J& Fuel Economy

   Carbon Balance (W)
 t™ Carbon Balance (NW)

 ^ HFET - Weighted

;::. HC - Grams/Mile
^ CO - Grams/Mile
 ;:- CO2 - Grams/Mile

j| Fuel Economy

   Carbon Balance (W)
   01
 6-14-79
11,336.3
   5.177
  38.205
   8.924
1058.417
  28.035
 28.43
 28.70
 38.
    02
  6-15-79
 11,380.4
    5.140
   41.395
    7.937
 1093.045
   27.032
   03
 6-21-79
11,444.5
   3.976
  31.004
   7.370
1035.472
  28.921
   04
 6-22-79
11,492.6
   4.650
  33.386
   7.933
1099.264
  26.995
  28.39
  28.54
 28.41
 29.02
 27.69
 27.97
   Comments:   Tests 01 and 02 - Baseline -
  37.92         38.23          35.63
     j

Tests 03, 04, and 05 - Device  Installed.
   05
 6-29-79
11,609.1
   4.494
  44.981
   7.829
1082.198
  26.964
1.453
23.980
8.103
1224.056
27.314
1.746
22.641
6.981
1224.968
27.548
1.235
19.702
8.373
1271.935
26.433
0.910
15.288
7.015
1260.166
26.505
1.022
18.063
8.578
1239.571
26.773
2.084
19.893
8.384
979.229
31.184
1.515
14.241
7.881
1006.444
31.153
1.300
14.475
6.979
950.253
32.600
1.071
13.407
7.988
994.321
30.931
1.608
20.879
6.952
992.859
30.553
.650
6.916
2.235
299.037
.633
6.427
1.970
300.197
.493
5.520
2.075
301.958
.476
5.040
2.024
310.800
.524
6.674
2.153
307.375
 21.IS
 27.96
.126
3.400
224.457
.153
4.223
226.752
.051
.734
230.647
.052
.766
247.513
.056
1.774
225.808
                                                                                        38.76

-------
                      SUMMARY OF CVS-CH/HFET TEST RESULTS

                           AUTO-MISER INTERNATIONAL

                             AR PROJECT NO. 79091
* i*
'*i

Vehicle No. 05 - 1977 Chevette

Test Number                 08
Test Date                 7-02-79
Odometer                 11,678.8
Phase I              -	•

HC - Grams/Phase            5.236
CO - Grams/Phase           34.885
NOx - Grams/Phase           6.845
C02 - Grams/Phase        1046.720
Fuel Economy               28.159

Phase II

HC - Grams/Phase
CO - Grams/Phase
NOx - Grams/Phase
C02 - Grams/Phase
Fuel Economy

Phase III

HC - Grams/Phase
CO - Grams/Phase
NOx - Grams/Phase
CO2 - Grams/Phase
Fuel- Economy

Weighted Emissions

HC - Grams/Mile
CO - Grams/Mile
NOx - Grams/Mile
CO2 - Grams/Mile

Fuel Economy

Carbon Balance  (W)         28.86
Carbon Balance  (NW)        29.03

HFET - Weighted

HC - Grams/Mile              .050
CO - Grams/Mile             1.611
C02 - Grams/Mile          223.914

Fuel Economy

Carbon Balance  (W)         39.14
                                                    10
                                                  7-05-79
                                                 11,717.8
                                                    6.502
                                                   37.089
                                                    6.349
                                                 1046.731
                                                   27.849
   3-1
 •J^b-79
11 770.2
   6.997
  47.279
   6.096
1063.444
  27.275
                                                   28.30
                                                   28.57
                                                     .060
                                                    1.923
                                                  226.899
                                                   38.54
  28.80
  28.87
    .051
   2.260
 224.394
  38.88
                                                                      12
                                                                    7-07-79
                                                                   11,800.2
                                                                      8.334
                                                                     38.085
                                                                      6.820
                                                                   1095.991
                                                                     26.715
.850
16.545
6.813
1192.437
28.033
.894
15.723
6.115
1233.944
27.211
1.676
21.720
4.956
1176.427
28.072
1.282
17.927
5.229
1179.180
28.044
1.344
20.885
5.684
972.159
31.197
1.184
17.306
5.936
989.448 .
31.027
1.259
19.216
5.442
965.195
31.684
1.171
17.011
4.658
970.190
31.595
.522
5.863
1.754
296.427
.589
5.597
1.647
302.743
.728
7.145
1.440
294.396
.748
5.951
1.463
297.994
                                                                     28.63
                                                                     28.63
                                                                       .114
                                                                      3.866
                                                                    230.446
                                                                     37.44

Comments:  Tests 08 and 10 - Device Installed; Tests 11 and 12 - Device Removed.

-------
                                          95
                                 SUMMARY OF CVS-CH/IIFET TEST RESULTS

                                      AUTO-MISER INTERNATIONAL

                                        AR PROJECT NO.  790912
     Vehicle No. 33 - 1979 Ford Pinto
Test Number
Test Date
Odometer
Phase I
HC - Grams/Phase
CO - Grams/Phase
NOx - Grams/Phase
C02 - Grams/Phase
Fuel Economy
01
6-15-79
7,377.4

57047"""""
45.596
9.318
1623.063
18.458
02
6^-16-79
7,419.0

4.871
52.624
8.470
1605.610
18.596
Q3
6- .10- 79
7,470.4

4.170
42.202
9.069
1602.161
18.893
04
5-21-79
7,517.5

3.881
57.162
8.486
1541.354
19.285
„   Phase  II
j
I     HC - Grams/Phase
     CO - Grams/Phase
_   NOx -  Grams/Phase
I   CO2 -  Grams/Phase
'"   Fuel Economy

|j   Phase  III

     HC - Grams/Phase
     CO - Grams/Phase
l'<   NOx -  Grams/Phase
LJi   CO2 -  Grams/Phase
     Fuel Economy

1
gj   Weighted Emissions

     HC - Grams/Mile
JH   CO - Grams/Mile
3   NOx -  Grams/Mile
     CO2 -  Grams/Mile

'
-------
                            SUMMARY OF CVS-CH/HFET TEST RESULTS

                                  AUTO-MISER INTERNATIONAL

                                   AR PROJECT NO. 79091
Vehicle No.  73 - 1979 Ford Fairmont
|H; Test Number
Test Date
_ Odometer
il Phase I
HC - Grams/Phase
H CO - Grams/Phase
11 NOx - Grams/Phase
CO2 - -Grams/Phase
M Fuel Economy
Phase II
SB HC - Grams/Phase
* CO - Grams/Phase
NOx - Grams/Phase
;:;: CO2 - Grams/Phase
W Fuel Economy
Phase III
1 HC - Grams/Phase
CO - Grams/Phase
__ NOx - Grams/Phase
ฃ CO2 - Grams/Phase
••;j Fuel Economy
*fj Weighted Emissions
'* HC - Grams/Mile
r'O - Grams/Mile
f NOx - Grams/Mile
I'i CO2 - Grams/Mile
;:;: Fuel Economy
'-'•'- Carbon Balance (W)
Carbon Balance (NW)
| HFET - Weighted
HC - Grams/Mile
M CO - Grams/Mile
ฃ? CO2 - Grams/Mile
01
6-14-79
429.6
7.136
55.830 _
4.163
2109.797
14.295
3.652
1.618
5.287
2232.680
15.187
6.540
12.499
5.851
1817.090
17.129
1.406
4.409
1.401
561.899
15.47
15.44
.158
.171
435.803
02
6-15-79
483.0
10.319
" 5.010
2187.049
13.829
3.921
1.804
5.939
2224.248
15.323
5.246
9.448
5.711
1855.191
16.880
1.520
4.269
1.520
565.543
15.37
15.24
.413
.221
413.918
                                                  03
                                                6-20-79
                                                 528.2
                                                  7.709
                                                 46.414
                                                  4.219
                                               2095.794
                                                 14.402
                                                  1.707
                                                  0.714
                                                  5.855
                                               2227.621
                                                 15.181
                                                  3.512
                                                 13.925
                                                  5.384
                                               1806.490
                                                 17.168
                                                  0.951
                                                  3.856
                                                  1.454
                                                563.059
                                                 15.50
                                                 15.49
                                                   .274
                                                   .152
                                                411.204
                         Q&
                       S=31-?9
                        iifii.O
                         6.992
                     -,.  43.547
                         4.347
                      2119.921
                        14.279
                         1.232
                         0.308
                         6.149
                      2228.286
                        15.182
                         2.699
                        11.924
                         5.376
                      1841.964
                        16.891
                         0.783
                         3.499
                         1.501
                       567.552
                        15.41
                        15.37
                          .185
                          .221
                       399.646
                         05
                       67-25=79
                        618.3
                         5.730
                        50.176
                         3.965
                      2194.649
                        13.540
                         0.903
                         3.169
                         4.984
                      2291.037
                        14.900
                         2.323
                         9.463
                         4.872
                      1850.734
                        16.957
                         0.634
                         4.083
                         1.277
                       579.163
                        15.09
                        15.01
                          .168
                          .519
                       407.832
                         06
                       6-26-79
                        649.0
                         5.878
                        53.956
                         4.024
                      2137.138
                        14.093
                         0.743
                         0.920
                         5.532
                      2221.173
                        15.209
                         2.144
                         9.575
                         4.639
                      1832.746
                        16.961
                         0.609
                         4. Oil
                         1.344.
                       567.895
                        15.39
                        15.33
                          .134
                          .144
                       406.908
Fuel Economy

Carbon Balance (W)
                          21.59
21.34
21.51
22.14
21.67
21.76
Comments:  Tests 01 and 02 - Baseline;  Tests 03 and 04 - Device Installed;  Tests 05 and 06
           Device Removed.

-------
••'
•I* -
                                        97
                         CATALYTIC CONVERTER EFFICIENCY fEST
                                  AUTO-MISER INTERNATIONAL
                                    AR PROJECT NO. 79091
          Vehicle No.:  05 (Chevrolet/Chevette)*
          Test Date:   June 14, 1979
                         r.   c-  Jackel
                    Technician:  K.  Bartholomew
          50 MPH
             CO (%)  High
             HC (ppm)  X50
             NOx (ppm)  1000
Before

    .40
2710.00
 172.50
After

   .02
470.00
125.00
% Efficiency

     95
     83
     28
          30. MPH
             CO (%)  High
             HC (ppm) X50
             NOx (ppm) 1000
    .15
2040.00
 230.00
   .00
200.00
192.00
    100
     90
     17
          IDLE
             CO (%) High
             HC (ppm) X50
             NOx (ppm) 1000
.35
1905.00
70.00
.00
255.00
56.00
                                     100
                                      87
                                      20
          *Baseline

-------
                                98
                CATALYTIC CONVERTER EFFICIENCY TEST RESULTS
                         AUTO-MISER INTERNATIONAL
                           AR PROJECT NO. 79091
Vehicle  No.:    05 (Chevroiet7i€he^rette)*
Test Date:   June 21, 1979**
                    Driver:   Bill.Martinez
                    Technician:  Lonnie Arnold
 50 MPH
   CO  (%)  High
   HC  (ppm)  X50
   NOx (ppm)  1000
Before

    .25
2175.00
 117.00
After

   .05
220.00
127.50
% Efficiency

     80
     90
    -09
 30 MPH
   CO (%)  High
   HC (ppm)  X50
   NOx (ppm)  1000
    .10
1585.00
 206.00
   .02
110.00
800.00
     80
     93
    -13
 IDLE
    CO (%)  High
    HC (ppm)  X50
    NOx (ppm)  1000
    .10
3050.00
  98.00
   .00
150.00
135.00
    100
     95
    -38
 *Device installed
**This test was run immediately after test 05-03 and prior to the repairs that
  are mentioned in item no.  9 in the Testing Series Section for this vehicle.
  No  converter efficiency tests were conducted after these repairs were made.

-------
                              99
               CATALYTIC CONVERTER  EFFICIENCY  TEST RESULTS
                        AUTO-MISER  INTERNATIONAL
                          AR PROJECT  NO.  79091
Vehicle No.:    33  (Ford/Pinto)*
Test Date:   June 15,  1979
                    Drivers   C. Jackel
                    Technician:  K. Bartholomew
50 MPH
   CO {%) High
   HC (ppm) X50
   NOx  (ppm) 1000
Before

    .15
1290.00
 305.00
After

   .00
 70.00
347.00
% Efficiency

    100
     95
    -14
30 MPH
   CO (%) High
   HC (ppm) X50
   NOx  (ppm)  2500
    .60
2170.00
 169.75
   .15
155.00
102.50
     75
     93
     40
IDLE
   CO  (%) High
   HC  (ppm) X50
   NOx  (ppm) 1000
1.60
1770.00
109.00
.70
750.00
83.00
                                      56
                                      58
                                      24
*Baseline

-------
                             100
               CATALYTIC CONVERTER EFFICIENCY TEST RESULTS
                        AUTO-MISER INTERNATIONAL
                          AR  PROJECT NO.  79091
Vehicle No.:    33  (Ford/Pinto)*
Test Date:   June 20-,  1973--  ~_~-
                    Driver:   C. Jackel
                    Technician:  C. VanTassel
50 MPH
   CO (%) High
   HC (ppm) X50
   NOx  (ppm) 1000
Before

    .14
1340.00
 299.00
After

   .01
 95.00
333.00
% Efficiency

     93
     93
    -11
30 MPH
   CO (%) High
   HC (ppm) X50
   NOx  (ppm)  2500
   1.00
2395.00
 128.00
   .25
245.00
 74.75
     75
     90
     42
IDLE
   CO (%) High
   HC (ppm) X50
   NOx  (ppm) 1000
.04
2205.00
107.00
.01
145.00
113.00
                                      98
                                      93
                                     -06
*Device installed

-------
                                         101
                         CATALYTIC CONVERTER  EFFICIENCY TEST RESULTS
                                  AUTO-MISER  INTERNATIONAL
                                    AR PROJECT  NO.  79091
          Vehicle No.:  73  (Ford/Fairmont)*
          Test Date:  June  14", 1979"    ~~~^
                    Driver:   Bill Martinez
                       *ป
                    Technician:  Jerry Jelinek
          50 MPH
             CO (%) High
             HC (ppm) X50
             NOx (ppm) 1000
Before

    .04
3450.00
 329.00
  After

    .001
2290.000
 369.000
% Efficiency

     98
     34
    -12
          30 MPH
II
             CO (%) High
             HC tppm) X50
             NOx (ppm) 1000
    .10
2625.00
 448.00
    .003
 930.000
 397.000
     97
     65
     11
          IDLE
             CO (%) High
             HC (ppm) X50
             NOx (ppm) 1000
.45
3050.00
350.00
.000
875.000
400.000
                                     100
                                      71
                                     -14
1
          *Baseline

-------
                                             102
w*  i
i!
11
CATALYTIC CONVERTER EFFICIENCY TEST RESULTS
         AUTO-MISER INTERNATIONAL
           AR PROJECT  NO.  79091
            Vehicle No.:    73  (Ford/Fairmont)*
            Test Date:   June 20,  1979
                                Driver:   Bill Martinez
                                Technician:   Lonnie Arnold
            50 MPH
               CO (%)  High
               HC (ppm)  X50
               NOx (ppm)  1000
             Before

                 .12
             3000.00
              266.00
 After

   .005
625.000
206.000
% Efficiency

     96
     79
    -15
            30 MPH
               CO (%)  High
               HC (ppm)  X50
               NOx (ppm)  1000
                 .11
             6675.00
              290.00
   .002
340.000
305.000
     98
     95
    -05
            IDLE
               CO (%)  High
               HC (ppm)  X50
               NOx (ppm)  1000
.50
3000.00
380.000
.001
475.000
310.000
                                                  99
                                                  84
                                                  18
           *Device installed

-------
     TEST HO:

     PROJECT:

     VEHICLE:
                                 103

                     EG&G flUTOMOTIVE RESEfiRCHj  IMC.

                         FEDERRL TEST PROCEDURE

                  1978 URBRH DVNRMOMETER EMISSION TEST
                                                               PRGE 1  OF 2
                        01
                    790912
                                                TEST DRTE:
                                                REPT DRTE:
                                                ODOMETER:
                   6-14-79

                   6-15-79

                  11336.3
n
•m
     HUMIDITY(Ra-H)
     MIXTURE  TEMP(PTI)
     BflROMETER  IN-HG(F'b)
  L23
  ™
  n


•H"

ris
If


pli
I  -rtl
 a
 Liii^
PRESSURES:
INLET/OUTLET
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
VCKCU.FT./REV. )
VMIX (CU.FT. )
2N(RPM)
XO
MILES/ERG
    HCE/HCD   (PPM)
    COEM-CODM(PPM)
    HOXE-NOXD(PPM)
    C02E/C02D  (';)
                            RMBIENT CONDITIONS

                              PHRSE 1          PHfiSE 3
                        73.98   97,
                            104.56
                             29. 13
72.63  102.28
    104.50
     29.12
                                CVS DRTR

                            —PHRSE 1--    —PHRSE  2--    —PHRSE 3--


                           12.95    3.45   12.95    3.45   12.95   3.45
    HC  (GRRMS/TEST PHRSE)
    CO  (GRRMS/TEST PHRSE)
    HOX (GRRMS/TEST PHRSE)
    C02 (GRRMS/TEST PHRSE)
    FUEL ECONOMY (MFC)
10R04
0.295584
2539.93
1138.24
0.000215
••> =; o o
•j . •-' '-' '-'
RHRLYTICRL
133.50 9.32
477.67 2.52
58.90 0.90
0.84 0.84
TEST PHRSE R
COLD STRRT
TRfiHSIEHT
(PHRSE 1)
5. 177
38. 205
8.924
1058.417
28.035
17223
0.295584
4372.77
1183.24
0. 000215
3. 900
DRTR
26.73 6.69
173.70 1.37
31.10 0.50
0.58 0.04
ESULTS
COLD STRRT
STRBILIZED S
(PHRSE 2)
1 . 453
23.980
8.103
1224.056
27.314
10020
0.295579
2543.39
1188.24
0. 000215
3.577

56.56
247.77
54.00
O. 78

HOT STRRT
TRBILIZED
(PHRSE
2.084
19.893
8.384
979.229
31.184







6.79
1.09
1 . 00
0.04



!"! ')






-------
LI
I!
J m
[I
Li
 LI
 fl
                                    104
                      EGkG flUTOMOTIVE RESEflRCHj INC.
                          FEDERflL TEST PROCEDURE
                    1973 URBRN DYHRMOMETER EMISSION TEST
                                                     PflGE  2  OF  2
       TEST NO:
       PROJECT:
       VEHICLE:
               01
           798912
             05
                                VEHICLE  HflTfl
                                   " CHEVROLET
                                                    TEST DfiTE:      6-14-79
                                                    REPT DflTE:      6-15-79
                                                    ODOMETER :11336.3
                                      1977  CHEVETTE
                                        1B08E7Y155251
VEHICLE MflKE:
MODEL YERR/MODEL:
VEHICLE I.D. NUMBER:
ENGINE SERIflL NUMBER:
INERT IR WEIGHT:   2250 POUNDS

                 WEIGHTED MRSS EMISSIONS
     TEST RESULTS                   1973 EPR STRNDRRDS
HC:    9.650 GRRMS/MILE             HC:   1.5 GRRMS/MILE
          CO:    6.916 GRfiMS/MILE
          HOX:   2.235 GRflMS/MILE
          COS: 299.037 GRflMS/MILE
                                    CO:   15.8 GRRMS/MILE
                                    NOX:  2.0 GRRMS/MILE
           URBRN  FUEL  ECONOMY:  28.43 MILES/GRLLON
           COMMENTS:
           QURLITY  CONTROL  VERIFICATION:
   I   --

-------
                                   105
                E G & G flUTOHOTIVE RESERRCH? INC,
                 1978 Highway Fuel Economy  Test
   Test No:
   Project:
   Vehicle:
            01
        790912
            65
Test Date:   6-14-79
Report Date:   6-15-79
Mileage:   11347.5
                            Test Data
      B1ower Re v o1uti ons:   1513 4
      Barometer 
-------
                                   106
                          EG&G RUTOMOTIVE RESERRCH,  INC.

                              FEDERflL TEST PROCEDURE

                       197:3 LIRBflH BYNfiMGMETER EM I S3 I OH  TEST
                                                            PflGE 1 OF 2
      TEST NO:

      PROJECT:

      VEHICLE:
                  92

              798912

                  85
TEST BflTE:

REFT DfiTE:

ODOMETER:
S-15-79

7-03-79
                                                                     380. 4
      HUMIDITY(Ro.-H>
      MIXTURE TEMP
                          flMBIENT CONDITIONS

                                PHRSE 1

                             53.12   70.53
                                 134.50
                                  29, 17
      PHHSE 3

    55.71   77.64
       105.00
i;;;
PRESSURES:
INLET/OUTLET
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
VCKCU.FT./REV. )
VMIX (CU.FT.)
ZN(RPM)
XO
MILES/BflG
       HCE/HCD   
       COEM/CODM(PPM)
       NOXE/NOXD(PPM>
       C02E/C02D  
 HOX  (GRRMS/TEST  PHflSE")
 CO2  (GRRMS/TEST  PHRSE>
 FUEL  ECONOMY  (MPG)
                                 TEST PHHSE RESULTS
                                     COLD STRRT
                                     TRRN3IENT
                                     (PHHSE 1)
                                            COLD  STflRT
                                            STR8ILIZED
                                            (PHRSE  2')
           HOT STRRT
           STRBILIZED
           (PHRSE 3)


4

4 1 ]
7.
093.
O T1
140
395
937
045
302
1.
6 .
1224.
ฃ. f •
746
641
931
963
548
1.
14.
r >
1 0 0 6 .
31,
515
241
331
444
153

-------
                                   107
 *n
                   EG&G RUTOMOTIVE RESERRCH,  INC.
                       FEDERRL TEST PROCEDURE
                1978 URE'RN DYNRMOMETER EMISSION  TEST
                                                                   PRGE. 2  OF  2
                 02
             790912
               05
TEST HO:
PROJECT:
VEHICLE:


VEHICLE MRKE:

MODEL YERR/MODEL:

VEHICLE I.D. NUMBER:

ENGINE SERIRL  NUMBER:

INERT IR WEIGHT:    2250  POUNDS
                                           DflTfl
                                 CHEVROLET
                                   1977  CHEVETTE
                                     1B03E7Y155251
                                                    TEST DflTEs      6-15-79
                                                    REป7 DflTE:      7-03-79
                                                    ODOMETER  : 11339.4
h
I M
h
i-ia!
IN
n
I  a
                        WEIGHTED MflSS EMISSIONS
      TEST RESULTS                            1978 EPfi STflNDRRDS
HC:     9.638 GRRMS.--MILE                      HC:   1.5 GRflMS/MILE
 CO:     6.427 GRRMS/M ILE

 HOX:   1.970 GRRMS/MILE

 C 0 2: 3 0 0.197 G R R M S/MILE

 IJRBRN FUEL ECONOMY:  ฃ8.39 MILES/GRLUJN

 COMMENTS:

 Q U R LI T Y C 0 N T R 0 L V E RIFIC R T 10 N:
                                             CO:   15.0 GRHMS/MILE
                                              HOX:   2.0  GRflMS/MILE
u

-------
                                   108
                G  & G RIJTGMOTIVE RESEflRCH,
                                                  INC
                      978 Highway Fuel Economy   Test
...i^
Test No:        02
Project:    799912
Vehicle:        95

                         Test Data
   B1ower R evo1u tions:  15128
   Barometer (corr) :  23.27
   B1 o'.-.' e r P r e s s u r e s:
   i n1et/out let         12.88  3.48
   Mixture Temperature:   185.8
   Humidity (Relative):   55.17':
   Ro11  Revo1ut i ons:   2375S.88

                        finalytical Data
   H y d r' o c a r b o n s  < e x h a u s t ) :        3 0.5 P P m
   H y d r o c a r b o n s  (b a c k •=> r o u n d ) :      €•. 6 P P m
  C arb on Mon o xi de  (exha us t):    351.5 PPm
  C a r b o n M o n o x i d e  < b a c k 9 r o u n d >:    1. 9 P P i
  C o. r b o n D i o x i d e  < ex h a u s t > •'      1.1 S 5 8 '/.
  C a r b o n D i o x i d e  •' b a c k 
  HC:
  CO:
               0.153
               4. 228
        LL1-:   225.752
        Calculated Fuel Economy:  37.92   MPG

-------

                                —•- 109 ••
m
1
m
t
€i

TEST HO:
PROJECT:
VEHICLE:

03
79Q912
85
a
i
1
                          EG&G  RUTOMOTIVE  RESEfiRCH,  INC.

                             FEDERRL  TEST PROCEDURE

                       1973 URBfiN  DYNfiMOMETER EMISSION  TEST
                                    *>.


                                                    TEST  DfiTE:

                            	_-.._';            ,   REPT  DflTE:

                                                    ODOMETER:
                                                                   PfiGE'l OF 2
      HUMIDITY
      MIXTURE TEMP(PTI)
      BflROMETER  IN-HG
      PRESSURES:
      INLET/OUTLET
      BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
      VO
      COEMxcOB&KPPM)
      :u2E.-'Cu2B
                                flHflLYTICflL DflTfl
                            104.77
                            389.67
                             44.90
                              0.83
                                      8.32   23.72
                                      1.26  144.5R
                                      0.70   30.00
                                      0.04    Q.gfi
          6.59   33.41
          1.64  182.95
          0.80   46.40
          0.U4    6.77
           6.99
           0.32
           0.90
           0.04
3

           CONOMY
                               TEST PHflSE RESULTS
                                   COLD STflRT
                                   TRftHSIEHT
                                   CPHflSE 1>
                                                COLD STflRT
                                                STftBILIZED
                                                
                                                              HOT STftRT
                                                              STRBILIZED
                                                              
PHflSE)
PHflSE)
PHflSE >
PHflSE)
G)
3.976
31.004
7.370
1035.472
28.921
1 . 235
19.702
o 'Z'-fi
o . o i o
1271.935
26.433
1.300
14.475
6.979
950.253
32.600

-------
  Jl-
                                  110
., r
                             cGO,G fiUTOMOTIVE RESEflRCH,  IMC.   ;
                                 FEDERflL TEST PROCEDURE
                          1978 URBfiN  DYHfiMOMETER  EMISSION TEST
                                                        PflGE- 2 OF
         TEST NO:
         PROJECT:
         VEHICLE:
             03
         799912
           05
  TEST DfiTE:     6-21-79
  REPT DfiTE:     7-03-79
  ODOMETER :11444.5
        VEHICLE MflKE:
        MODEL YEflR/MOUEL:
        VEHICLE I.D. NUMBER:
        ENGINE SERIflL NUMBER:
                        VEHICLE DftTfl.
                      CHEVROLET

                       1977 CHEVETTE

                         1B03E7Y155251
        INERTIfi HEIGHT:   2250 POUNDS
                   WEIGHTED  MflSS EMISSIONS
 TEST RESULTS                            1978 EPR STflNDflRDS
  0.493 GRflMS/MILE                      HC:    1.5 GRfiMS-'MILE
        HC:

        CO:

        NOX:

        C02:
  5.520 GSflHS/MILE
  2.075  GRflMS/MILE

381.958  GRflMS/MILE
CO:  15.0 GRRM3/MILE

NOX:  2.0 GRflMS/MILE
        "KERN FUEL ECONOMY:   2s.4i  MILES/GHLLON
        COMMENTS:
              Y CONTROL  VERIFICflTIQN:

-------
                                  Ill
                                 112
             E G• & b HUTOHOTIVE RESEfiRCHj IHC,
              1978 Highway Fuel Economy  Test
Test Ho:
Projecti
Vehicle:
  03
799912
    95
Test Date:   6-21-79
Report Date:   6-21-79
Mileage:   11464.6
                          Test  Data
   Blower Revolutions:   15156
   Baroneter  (corr)  :   29.14
   Blower Pressures:
   inlet/outlet          13.78   3.48
   Mixture  Temperature:  189.5
   Hunidity (Relative):  67.41*
   Roll  Revolutions;   23697.88
                         finalvtical  Data
   H y d r o c a r b o n s ( e x h a u s t ) :       13.9 P P n
   H y d r o c a r b o n s < b a c- k -3 r o u n d ) :      6.1 P P n
    Carbon Monoxide ''exhaust):     65.4 PPH
    Carbon Monoxide (background):   3.8 PPIVI
    Carbon Dioxide (exhaust):     1.2488 */.
    Carbon Dioxide (back-ground):  8.8518 '/.
                    Test ResuIts  (grans/fti1e)
    HC:    0.051
    CO:    0.734
    C|J2:  230.647
    Calculated  Fuel Economy:   38.23   MFC

-------
 (-"fl
 I ^
  K

L *
r ^:

r,
LI
r "TR
Ul
                     EG&G RUTOMOTIVE RESEflRCH,  IN,..,

                         FEDERflL TEST PROCEDURE

                  1973 URBflH DYNflMCiMETER EMISSION  TEST
 TEST  NO:

 PROJECT:

 VEHICLE:



 VEHICLE MflKE:
                                         TEST IIHTE:
                                                                     ฃ-22-79
                     790912
                       05
  :*    MODEL  YERR.--MODEL:
 •^
  4    VEHICLE  I.D.  NUMBER:


 i;?    ENGINE SERIRL NUMBER:
                        VEHICLE  DRTR

                    ' rHEVRriLET


                       1979  CHEVETTE


                          1B03E7Y15525
       INERT I R  HEIGHT:    2258 POUNDS
HC:
TEST RESULTS

 0.476 GRftMS/MILE
WEIGHTED MRSS EMISSIONS

                      197S

                     HC:
EPfl STRNDRRDS

1.5 GRRMS,-'MILE
CO:    5.840 GRRMS/MILE
      HOX:   2.024 GR RMS.-"MILE
      CO2: 319.S00 GRRMS/MILE
URBflH FUEL ECONOMY:  27.69 MILES/GHLLO!
      COMMENTS:
      Q U fl LIT Y C 0 N T R 0 L V E RIFIC fl T10 N:
                                                    CO:   15.8 GRRMS/MILE
                                                      X:   2.3 GRRMS/MILE
                                      .*~ •.

-------
                                  113
                          EG&G RUTOMOTIVE RESERRCH, INC.


                            .,  FEDERRL TEST PROCEDURE


                       1973 URBRN DVHflMOMETER EMISSION TEST
 S*]
      TEST NO:

      PROJECT:

      VEHICLE:
              79091
      HUMIDITY(Ra-H)
      MIXTURE TEMPtPTI)
      BRROMETER IN-HG(Pb':•
                          RUB I ENT CON LIT ION:!


                                FHfiSE 1


                             73.98   97.41
                                 105,50
                                  29. 11
         TEST  DflTE:


         REPT  DflTE:


         ODOMETER:
          7-06-79


         11492.6
                                                          PHflSE 3
            fc.9.77
      9 0. 1 9
                10!
                 29. 11
[1
[1
L-

r '""
L.3
PRESSURES:
INLET/OUTLET
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
VQ
COEM/COnM(PPM)
NOXE/NOXD
C02E/C02D  ('•.')
      HC   -::GRHMS/TEST  PHHSE>
      CO   (GRflMS/TEST  PHflSE)
      NOX  (GRRMS/TEST  PHRSE)
      C 0 2  (G R R M S / TEST  P H fl S E ':•
      FUEL ECONOMY  
-------
           E G c, c
                                    J.J.H
                               o rive P.-E •:.ฃ>. S:CH
                  1978 Highway Fuel Economy  Test
   Test Ho:         04

   Project:     790912

   Vehicle:         05
                                            Test Dates    6-22-79

                                            Re P ort  Dat e:    6-22-79

                                            Mileages    11492.6
 J
Li
LI
 '1
[I
                        Test Data

B1 o w e r R e',.' o 1 u t i o n •=,'•   15 081 __ __ _^.  .

B o. r o FI e t e r  (c o r r > :   29.11

Blower Pressures:
i n1et/out let            6.60   1.55

M i x t LI r e T e FI P e r a t u re:   1 y 5. 8

H LI FI i d i t y  < R e I a t i'.,' e >:   62.16 "•;

R o11 Re M o1u t i o n s:   2 3 723.0 0

                       finalvt ical Data

H y d r o c a r b o n s < e :*: h a LI s t):       14. 4  P p FI

H v d r o c a r b o n s (b a c k •? r o u n d):      7. 3  P P FI

C a r b o n  M o n o x i d e  (e x h a LI s t):    62.2  P P FI

C a r b o n  N o n o x i d e  >'. b a c k -g r o LI n d):    2.5 P P FI

C a r b o n  D i o x i d e  (e x h a LI s t):     1.214 8 *;

C a r b o n  D i o x i d e  < b a c k •? r o LI n d):  0. 8 4 6 8 ";
 J
 HC:

 CO:
                        T f- s t R >~ s LI 11. s  (-g r" o. FI i / FI i 1 e
              S.052

              0.766
       CQ2:   247.513

       C a 1 c u 1 a t e d  F u e 1  E c o n o FI y:   3 5. 6 3  i • 1P G
           CoFinents


-------
                                115  '


                    EG&G RUTOMOTIVE RESERRCH, INC.

                        FEDERRL TEST PROCEDURE

                 1973 URBRN DYNRMOMETER EMISSION  TEST
TEST HO:

PROJECT:

VEHICLE:
    85

796912

    65
         TEST  BflTE'i

         REP-  DfiTEs

         ODOMETER:
          5-29-79

          6-29-79

         11699.1
HUMIDITY(Ra-H)
MIXTURE TEMP(PTI)
BflROMETER IN-HG(Pb)
            RHElERT'"CONDITIONS

                :  PHRSE i

               68.55   94.78
                    105.09
                    29. 13
               PHRSE 3

            62.12   98.26
                1 fi 5. 0 fi
                 29. 18
PRESSURES:
INLET/OUTLET
BUHNER REVOLUTIONS
VCKCU.FT./REV. )
VMIX CCU.FT.>
ZH(RPM)
XO
MILES/ERG
                               CVS DRTR

                           PHRSE  1       PHRSE  2        PHRSE  8
          14.60   3.80
              9955
           0.293009
             2483.73
             1183.98
             0.000227
             3.549
14.60   3.30
    17113
  0.293009
    4269.63
   1183.93
   O.000227
14.60   3.30
     9930
  0. 293Pi0i;:i
    2477.50
   1133.93
   0.000227
    3.551
 HCE/HCD   (PPM)
 COEM/CODM(PPM)
 NOXE/NOXD(PPM)
 C02E/C02D   (";)
                            RNRLYTICHL  DfiTfl
13.57
75.25
54. 00
0.38
O • • J C*
O "7 O
lisa
0 . 0 5
21.05
137.00
34. 60
0. 60
6. 70
4. 36
1 . 00
0. 04
45.56
266.29
43.30
0 . 8 2
6.21
1.26
1 . 00
0. 05
 HC  (GRRMS/TEST  PHRSE)
 CO  (GRRMS/TEST  FHRSE)
 NOX (GRRMS/TEST  PHRSE)
 C02 (GRRMS/TEST  PHRSE)
 FUEL ECONOMY (MPG)
                           'EST  PHRSE RESULTS
                               COLD STFiRT
                               TRRNSIENT
                               (PHRSE 1)
                              COLD STRRT
                              STRBILIZED
                              (PHRSE 2)
                   HOT STRRT
                   STRBILIZED
                   (PHRSE 3)
4.494
44.981
7.329
' 1032. 193
26. 964 .
1.022
18.063
;-; . 5 7 ft
1239.571
26.773
1.603
20.879
6.952
992.359
30.553


-------
•sn
ti
m

71

TEST HO:
PROJECT:
VEHICLE:
197?
05
790912
05

f :••-!
                                   116
                                 107
                         Eb&G RUTOMOTIVE  RESERRCH,  IHu.

                             FEDERRL  TEST  PROCEDURE

                       1978 URBRN DYHflMOMETER  EMISSION  TEST


                                                    TEST
                                                             s 11609. 1
     VEHICLE MRKE:
     MODEL VERR/MODEL:
     VEHICLE  I.D.  NUMBER:
     ENGINE  SERIRL  NUMBER
  VEHICLE DflTfl

"CHEVROLET


  1977 CHEVETTE


     1B83E7115525
      INERTIR  WEIGHT:    2250  POUNDS



                              WEIGHTED MRSS EMISSIONS

            TEST  RESULTS         .                   1973 ERR STRNDRRDS

      H C:     0.524  G R R M S/MILE                      H C:    1.5 G R R M S/MILE
      CO:     6.674 GRRMS/MILE
      HOX:    2.153 GRRMS/MILE
      COS:  387.375 GRRMS/MILE
      URBfiH FUEL ECONOMY:   27.75 MILES/GRLLON
      COMMENTS:
      QURLITY CONTROL VERIFICRTION:
                   CO:   1.5.0 GRRMS/MILE
NO
                         2.0 GRRMS/MILE

-------
                                 117
                          EG&G flUTOMOTIVE  RESEflRCH?  INC.
 ^                            FEDERHL  TEST PROCEDURE
r.*i                        1973 HIGHWflY FUEL ECONOMY  TEST

I*
 h    TEST HQ:         05                           TEST i!HTE:   6-29-79
      PROJECT:     790912                           REPORT DflTE:   6-29-79
 y    VEHICLE:         05                           MILERGE:    11609,1
 •s^
 ^     .                               TEST DfiTfl
 ป]    BLOWER REVOLUTIONS:   15043
 '^    B fl R 0 METE R < c o r r) :  29.10
fijlj    BLOWER PRESSURES:
U-!    inlet/cwut let          14.75   3.30
 S-j    MIXTURE TEMPERflTURE:   104.5
 ^    HUMIDITY (Relative):   56.32'^
fl    ROLL REVOLUTIONS:  23674.00
L^
r-'n                                 HNfiLYTICRL DflTfl
 •^
 "~J    H Y D R OCfiRB 0 N S (e x h o. u •=. t):        15. b P P ;M
h    HYDROCARBONS (background):      6.2 PPH
      CflRBOtt MONOXIDE  (exhaust):    1^9.* PPM
f^.
L;|.    CflRBOH MONOXIDE  (background):    3.2 PPM
.^    CflRBOH DIOXIDE  (exhaust):      1.2230 '/.
^    CflRBON DIOXIDE  (background):  8.0478 '4
\f.
Lj
                       TEST RESULTS  (GRHMS/MILE:
HC:     8.056
CO:     1.774
C02:  225.303
CflLCULflTED FUEL ECONOMY:  33.76   MPG

COMMENTS:

-------
118
'4

&

*!
*
rtr,
j
=ri
.4


f ^
H
L -
fl
I ;J*

r -l;
;;i
L

1 *
I '
r T]
?*
L '
[.
N
. =1
L*
r-H
i ^.j

j ""!
L ^

i Tl
i *
EL

1973
TEST NO: OS-
PROJECT: 790912
VEHICLE: 05
-


HUMirHTY



'
HC (GRRMS/TEST PHflSE
CO (GRRMS/TEST PHflSE
NOX (GRRMS/TEST PHflSE
C02 (GRRMS/TEST PHflSE
FUEL ECONOMY (MPG)
&b flUTOMOTIVE RESEflRCH? INC.
FEDERRL TEST PROCEDURE
U R B fl N D Y N fl M U METE R E M I S S ION T E S T
TEST DflTE
REFT DflTE
JUDOMETER:
— - — — •— *•' ' *' *'
RMBIENT CONDITIONS
PHflSE 1 PHR
59. 99 83. 47 51 , '^l
105.00 10
23.96 2
CVS DflTfl

PHflSE 1 PHflSE 2

1 5 , 00 3 . 43 1 5 . 00 3 .43 15. fl
10129 17038
0.292113 0.292113 0.
2499,41 4216.59
1132.69 1132.69 1
0 . 00023 1 H . 1-10023 1 fl
3.550 3.360

RNRLYTICRL DRTR

137.47 9.36 13.09 6.02 ;i
439.57 0.63 124.11 1.36 26
49 . 30 0 . 38 29 . 60 1 . 00 4
O . 35 0 . 04 0 . 60 0.05
TEST PHflSE RESULTS
COLD STRRT COLD STRRT
TRRNSIENT STRBILIZED
(PHR3E 1) (PHflSE 2)
:r .;,-.,,_- fi j^p,
) 34.835 16.545
> 6.845 6.313
) 1046.720 1192.437
23.159 23.033



: 7-02-79
: 7-02-79
11673.3


BE 3
7 4 '"' 5
1 r • t_ ••'
5. 00
3.97


PHflSE 3

O 3.43
9959
292124
2453.13
132.69
fl H fl '"' '-! 1
•-: 5 5 Fi



3.12 4.95
3.07 1.39
3.50 0.70
0 . 3 0 0.04

HOT STRRT
STRBILIZED
< PHflSE 3)
1 . 344
'"' M O •"' C-
i^ U > '-' '-' • J
5.684
972. 159
31. 197

-------
n;

L.
 m
  H
L y
                                    119
                          EG&G flUTOMOTIVF :?ESEflRCHj  INL-.
                              FEDERflL TEST PROCEDURE
                       1978 IJRBRN DYNflMOMETER EMISSION  TEST
      TEST NO:
      PROJECT:
      VEHICLE:
    yy
790912
  95
                                                     TEST DflTE:     7-02-79
                                                     HlHpT DfiTEs     r-02-79
                                                     OtijnETER : 11678.3
      VEHICLE NflKE:
      MODEL YERR/MODEL:
      VEHICLE I.D. NUMBER:
      ENGINE SERIRL NUMBER:
                                    VEHICLE DflTfi
                                  CHEVROLET

                                   1977 CHEVETTE

                                     1B08E74155251
       INERT Ifl  WEIGHT:    2250 POUNDS


                               WEIGHTED MflSS EMISSIONS
             TEST RESULTS                            197S EPR STRNDRRDS
       HC:     0.522 GRRMS/MILE                      HC:   1.5 GRRMS/MILE
      CO:    5.863 GRRMS/MILE
       NOX
              1.754  GRRMS/MILE
                                                    CO:  15.9 GRRMS/MILE
                                      2.0 GRRMS/MILE
      C02: 296.427  GRRMS/MILE
      URBRN  FUEL  ECONOMY:   28.86  MILES/GRLLul
      COMMENTS:
       QURLITY  CONTROL  VERIFICATION
                                                       '---f-'

-------
rs
                            120
                     EGkG flUTOMOTIVE RESERRCH, INC,
                         FEDERflL TEST PROCEDURE
                     1978 HIGHNflY FUEL ECONOMY TEST
:;'.'
i
Tl
N
TEST NO:
PROJECT:
VEHICLE:
08
796912
85
                                                  TEST DRTE:   7-02-79
                                                  REPORT DRTE:   7-92-79
                                                  MILERGE:
 •
 i)
TS!
lit
                                TEST  DflTfl
BL0NER REV0LIjT10NS:   15069
BRROMETER (corr) :   23.98
BLOWER PRESSURES:
inlet/out let          15.80   3.43
MIXTIJRE TEMPERflTURE:   105. 0
HUMIDITY (Relative):   52.02';
ROLL REVOLUTIONS:  23727.00

                             FiNfiLYTICRL  DRTfl
HYDROCflRBOHS (exhaust):        14.1 PC.;-,,
HYDROCflRBOHS (background):      6.4 PPM
CflRBON MONOXIDE (exhaust):    142.y PPM
CflRBON MONOXIDE (background):   3.0  pp,,,
CfiRBOH DI OX IDE  ( exhaust):      1. 2210 ••;
CflRBOH DIOXIDE  (background):   0.0440 '/.
                       TEST RESULTS  (GRflMS/MILE)
HC:    0.050
CO:    1.611
C02:  223.914
CRLCULRTED FUEL ECONOMY:  39.14  MPG

COMMENTS:

-------
rr
  T'
'M

'5


HB
fl
i   :
S  a
TEST NO:
PROJECT:
VEHICLE:
85
790912
10
                           121


                    EGiiG RUTOMOTIVE RESERRCH? INC.

                        FEDERRL TEST PROCEDURE.

                 1978 LIRBRN DYNRMOHETER EMISSION TEST


                                              T'ซi~?T GtiTE<

                                              f^T-r DRTE:

                                             JUDOMETER:
HUMIDITY
MIXTURE TEMP(PTI)
ERROMETER IN-HG(Pb)
PRESSURES:
INLET/OUTLET
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
VCKCU.FT./REV. )
VMIX (CU.FT.)
ZN(RPM)
XO
MILES/BRG
       HCE/HCD  (PPM)
       COEM/CODM(PPM)
       NOXE/NOXD(PPM)
       C02E/C02D
                                                                   7-85 -79

                                                                   7-05-79

                                                                  11717.8
                                 RMBIENT CONDITIONS

                                       PHRSE 1
                                    60.92

                                       .45
                                        104.50
                                         29.03
                                      CVS DRTfi
                                  PHRSE 1
                                         PHRSE 2
   PHflSE 3 .

56.54   74.13
    104.50
     29.08
                                                             PHRSE
                              15.65   3.30  15.6
                                                   3.30  15.65   3.30
0.

1
0


169.
462.
46.
0.
1029
2912
2537
181.
.000
•O cr •-
RNRL
c o
71
60
35
1
90
.46
12
•-i -~i tr
ul -I1 • J
5
YTI
1 3 .
•-' •
1,
0.

1
0.2
718
912
4236



CrlL
P,d
15
00
Q5
11
0.
•-1
DRTR
•-'-.:
117.'
O~7
c. i .
0.
31.
000
• '-' i

60
99
20
60
2
93
.'53
12
235
1

10.
1.
O.
0.

0. 2
9925
91293


2447.22




14
90
90
04
11
O.
3

37
224
~46
0
81. 12
00R235
.570

.91
.45
. 00
> >-'d




o .
•~j
b— B
1.
0.




86
52
10
04
  m
                                 TEST PHRSE RESULTS
                                     COLD STRRT
                                     TRRNSIENT
                                     CPHFIGE  1)
                                            COLD STRRT
                                            STRBILIZED
                                            (PHRSE 2)
                                                              HOT STRRT
                                                              STRBILIZED
                                                              (PHRSE 3>

n

m


HC (
CO (
NOX (
C02 (
FUEL
gjflftate-^aa^ai.*
GRRMS/TE
GRRMS/
GRRMS/
GRRMS/
ECO MOM
JKJLBT^J^A.^
TE
TE
TE
Y

ST
ST
ST
ST
PHRSE)
PHflSE)
PHflSE)
PHflSE)
(MPG>


.••
37.
C1 ซ
1046.
27.
""
50
08
34
r w
84

O
9
9
1
•j

U.394
15.723
6. 115
1233.944
27.211

1.
17.
5.
989.
31.

184
306
936
448
027


-------
 -H
m
f
                                   122
                          EG&G  RUTOMOTIVE RESERRCHi-  INC.
                              FEDERRL TEST PROCEDURE
                       1978 URBRN DYHflMOMETER EMISSION TEST
TEST NO:           05
PROJECT:       790912
VEHICLE:         10

VEHICLE MflKE:
MODEL YERR/MODEL:
VEHICLE I.D. NUMBER:
ENGINE SERIRL NUMBER:
INERT Ifl WEIGHT:   2250 POUNDS
                                                    TEST DflTE:     7-05-79
                                                    REPT DflTE:     7-05-79
                                                    ODOMETER :11717.8
                                   VEHICLE DflTfl
                                 CHEVROLET

                                  1977 CHEVETTE

                                    1E08E7V155251
      HC:
      TEST  RESULTS
        8.589  GRflMS/MILE
                             WEIGHTED MflSS EMISSIONS
                                                   1978 EF'H STflMDflRDS
                                                  HC:   1.5 GRRMS/MILE
      CO:    5.597 GRRMS/MILE
      NOX:    1.647 GRRMS/MILE
      C02: 302.743 GRRMS/MILE
      URBRN FUEL ECONOMY:   28.30  MILES/GfiLLQH
       COMMENTS:
                                                  CO:   15.0 GRRMS/MILE
                                                  NOX:  2.0 GRRMS/MILE
       Q U R LIT Y  C 0 N T R 0 L  V E RIFIC R T10 H:

-------
I'm                               123
                           EG&G  flUTO MOTIVE RESEflRCHj INC.
I D                           FEDERRL TEST PROCEDURE
,..                          19 7 8  HIG H W R Y F U E L E C 0 N 0 M Y T E S T

r>;   TEST NO:         10                           TEST DflTE:   7-05-79
 ;;   PROJECT:     790912                           REPORT DRTE:   7-05-79
 f\   VEHICLE:         05                           MILERGE:    11717.3
 '35
r ^                       -   		 —ซ•' - l
\ 4                                   TEST DflTfl
 ^   BLOWER  REVOLUTIONS:   15010
  *   BRROMETER  (corr) :   29.OS
I ••   BLOWER  PRESSURES:
[ J;;   inlet /out let         15.65  3.30
r m   MIXTURE TEMPERRTURE:  194.5
- *   HUMIDITY (Relative):  50.45.';
['•**   ROLL REVOLUTIONS:   23304.00

r>                                RNRLYTICUL DflTfl
 ••   H Y D R 0 C R R B 0 N S (e x h a u s t):         16. 7 P P n
['*-• "  HYDROCRRBONS (back-^mund):     7.2 PPM
L  I
      CRRBON  MONOXIDE (exhaust):   169.4 PPM
      CRRBON  M 0 N 0 X IDE (b a c k -3 r o u n d):   i. 9 P P n
      CRRBON  DIOXIDE  (exhaust):      1.2470 ."•:
      CRRBON  DIOXIDE  (background):   0.0440 •;
 " "*                           TEST RESULTS  (GRRMS/MILE)
  ^    HC:     0.060
       CO:     1.923
 _ ;j    C02:   226.899
       CRLCULRTED FUEL ECONOMY:  38.54   MPG

       COMMENTS:

-------
                                    124
                          EG&G flUTOMOTIVE RESERRCHi- INC.

                              FEDERRL TEST PROCEDURE

                       1973 URBRN DYNfiMQMETER EMISSION TEST
TEST NO:
PROJECT:
VEHICLE:
11
790912
95
                                                    TEST DRTE:

                                                    REPT DflTE:

                                                    ODOMETER:
                                                             7-86-79

                                                             7-06-79

                                                            11770.2
[i
      HUMIDITYCRa-H)
      MIXTURE TEMP(PTI)
      BflROMETER IN-HG(Pb)
      PRESSURES:
      INLET/OUTLET
      BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
      VCKCU.FT./REV.)
      VMIX (CU.FT. )
      ZN(RPM)
      XO
      MILES/BRG
                                RMBIENT CONDITION

                                      PHiiSE 1
                             56.73
                                 104.36
                                 29. 14
    CVS DfiTfi

PHRSE 1
          75.55
                                               PHRSE 2
                       13.40   3.35
                           10239
                         O.294936
                           2589.72
                          1187.17
                          0.000213
                             563
          13.40   3.3:
              17164
            O.294936
              4341.25
              1187.17
             0.00021H
              3.349
   PHRSE 3

54.32   74.27
    104. 5Pi
     29. 12
                                                       PHRSE
  13.40   3.35
       9987
    0.294920
      2524.01
      1137.17
     O.000213
      3.571
                                 RNRLYTICRL. DfiTR
 f '
 I a
      HCE/HCD  (PPM)
      COEMxCODM(PPM)
      NOXE/NOXIKPPM)
      C02E/C02D   (";>
HC  (GRRMS/TEST PHRSE)
CO  (GRRMS/TEST PHRSE)
NOX (GRRMS/TEST PHRSE)
C02 (GRRMS/TEST PHRSE)
FUEL ECONOMY (MPG)
78.83 14.x 4 3
76.42 3.15 15
44.00 0.70 2
0.83 0.64
TEST PHRSE RES
COLD STRRT
TRRNSIENT
(PHRSE 1)
6.997
*t r' . ii f 'r1
6. 096
1063. 444
2^.275
4.77 11.6:3 39
3.93 2.72 241
1.50 0.50 40
0.56 0.04 O
ULTS
COLD STHRT
STRBILiZED
(PHRSE 2:'
1.676
21.720
4 . 9 3 6
1 1 ~7 /- .-:•-, -T
i L i t' . t il I
28.072
.80 9.85
.68 3.15
.70 0.80
.73 0.04

HOT STRRT
STRBILIZED
(PHflSE 3)
1.259
19.216
5.442
965. 195
31.634

-------
I 7e

                          EG&G RUTOMOTIVE RESERRCHj  INC.

                              FEDERRL TEST PROCEDURE

                       1978 UREflN DYNflMOMETER EMISSION  TEST
                                                             PRGE' 2  OF  2
    11

790912

  95
TEST NO:

PROJECT:

VEHICLE:




VEHICLE NRKE:


MODEL YERR/MODEL:


VEHICLE I.D. NUMBER:


ENGINE SERIflL NUMBER:


INERT I fl WEIGHT:   2258 POUNDS
                                   VEHICLE DRTR

                                 CHEVROLET


                                   1979  CHEVETTE


                                     1B98E7X155251
                                                     TEST  DflTE:      7-96-79

                                                     REFT  DflTE:      7-96-79

                                                     ODOMETER  :11770.2
p!
L*


I r^^

                               WEIGHTED  MflSS EMISSIONS

            TEST RESULTS                             1978 EF'H STHNDflRDS

       HC:    0.728 GRRMS/MILE                       HC:    1.5 GRRMS/MILE
 CO:    7.145 GRRMS/MILE
       NOXs    1.44Q  GRRMS/MILE
 r'•    C02:  294.396  GRRMS/MILE
       URBfiN- FUEL  ECONOMY:   28.30 MILES/GRLLON
       COMMENTS:
       Q U RLIT Y C 0 N T R 0 L V E RIFIC fi T10 N
                                              NO;
                                                         [5.R GRfiMS/MILE
                                      2.9 GRRMS/MILE

-------
                                     126
1?3
a
r?



TEST NO:
PROJECT:
VEHICLE:

11
39013
05
                         EG&G RUTOMOTIVE  RESERRCH?  INC.

                             FEDERflL  TEST PROCEDURE

                         1973 HIGHWflV FUEL ECONOMY TEST
                                                  TEST BFiTE:   7-06-79

                                                  REPORT DflTE:    7-06-79

                                                  MILERGE:    11770.2
                                     TEST  BflTR
h
i j

[a
B L 0 W E R RE VOL I J T 1 0 H S :   1512 6

BfiROMETER 
-------
•I!
                   127
                           E G &: G fl U T 0 M 0 TIV T: R E S E fl R C H >  IN C.

                               FEDERHL  TEST PROCEDURE

                         1973 UREflN DYNHMOMETER EMISSION  TEST
                                              I-'HGE  1 OF  2
       TEST NO:

       PROJECT:

       VEHICLE:
    12

790912

    05
         TEST  DOTE:

         REFT  DflTE:

        '"ODOMETER:
              7-97-79

              7-03-79

             11800.2
       HUMIDITY(Ra-H)
       MIXTURE  TEMP(FT I)
       BHROMETER  IH-HGCP
                                  HMBIENT  CONHIT IONS

                                        PHfiSE  1
tO. D
                       83. 10
                   104.00
                    29. 15
               PHflSE 3

            60.00   77,
                104.50
                 29. 14
             25
                                       CVS DflTH
        PRESSURES:
        INLET/OUTLET
        BLOWER  REVOLUTIONS
        VO(CU.FT./REV.)
        VMIX (CU.FT.>
        ZN(RPM)
        XO
        MILES/BfiG
        HCE/HCD  (PPM)
        COEM/CODM(PPM)
        NOXE/NOXD(PFM)
        C02E/C02D  (';>
                                   PHflSE 1
         13.75
                           PHflSE 2
13.75
•"• cr
•-' •_'
                  PHflSE
                      13.75   3.35

0.

1
0

1
ul.
Cl!
1
.
3
06
94
68
86
y y
.5
55
3 6
y .
, k!
y ฃ
62
HNflLY
20=;
447.
45.
0.
p
Q
8
y
,:,
.-,
0
^
1




6
47
2
ii 1

TICflL
ฃ •-'•-!
1.'39
0 . 3 0
0,08

0 .

•f
0

DflT
.-,-,
131
2 2
0
1
^
4
1
,
'•-'
R

'
m
m
71
94
'"' '"'
O t!
y y
• C1

15
42
00
56
30
366
4.3
22
y ^ i'
31







cr

i


'•H , 45
i!y0
0 , 6 0
0. 04
10156
0. 294357
•2559.2
1186.22
y. y002ci
3.565

:':; '3 '=i l
— ' .' • ป• A
211.73
34.00
0. 77


9

1


i
j.


                                                 3. 1
                                                 0. 80
                                                 0. 04
                                  TEST PHflSE RESULTS
        HC  (GRHMS/TEST FHflSE)
        CO  (GRRMS/TEST PHflSE)
        NOX (GRHMS/TEST PHflSE>
        C02 ( GRHMS/TEST PHflSE)
        FUEL ECONOMY (MPG)
                 COLD  STriRT
                 TRANSIENT
                 (PHflSE  1)

                    8,334.
                    3G.085
                    6. 320
                  1095.991
                    26=715
      COLD STflRT
      STHBILIZED
      (PHflSE 2)

         1.232
        17.927
         5.229
      1179.180
        28.044
         HOT STflRT
         STHBILIZED
         (PHflSE 3)

            1. 171
           17.011
            4.658
         970.190
           31.595

-------
                                        128
                           EG&G RUTOMOTIVE RESERRCH, iiiC,
                               FEDERRL TEST PROCEDURE
                        1978 IJRBRH DYNRMOMETER EMISSION TEST
                                              PRGE 2 OF 2
       TEST  NO:
       PROJECT:
       VEHICLE:
    12
'9991;
TEST DRTE:
REFT DflTE:     7-03-79
ODOMETER :11800.2
  j                       .    __  — -VEHICLE DflTfl
       VEHICLE MflKE:               CHEVROLET

       MODEL YERR/MODEL:            1977 CHEVETTE
 1
*...•'•'    VEHICLE I.D.  NUMBER:           IBSSEFYISSSSI

[%    ENGINE SERIflL NUMBER:

       INERT Ifl WEIGHT:   ฃ258 POUNDS
             ?,
                               WEIGHTED MflSS EMISSIONS
             TEST RESULTS                             1973 EPR  STRNDRRDS
       HC:    0.743 GRRMS/MILE                      HC:   1.5  GRRMS/MILE
       CO:    5.951 GRRMS/MILE
       NOX:   1.463 GRRMS/MILE
       C02: 297.994 GRRMS/MILE
  IT    URBRN FUEL ECONOMY:  23.63 MILES/GRLLON
       COMMENTS:
       Q U fl L I T Y C 0 N T R 0 L  V E R I F I C fl T 1 0 N
                               CO:  13.:3 GRRMS/MILE
                                10X:  2.9 GRRMS/MILE

-------
 r*
 I ฃ
:;:: TEST HO:
  PROJECT:
^ VEHICLE:
                     12
                796912
                     05
                                     129  129
                        EG&G flUTOMOTIVE  RESEflRCH)  IMC.
                            FEDERflL TEST PROCEDURE
                        197S HIGHHRY  FUEL  ECONOMY  TEST
                                                 TEST DRTE-.    7-67-79
                                                 REPORT DRTE:    7-68-79
                                                 MILERGE:    11399.2
                                    TEST  DRTH
  *, BLOWER REVOLUTIONS:   15128
  'a BRROMETER  (corr)
 •& BLOMER PRESSURES:
  ri_ inlet/out let
                         29.14
                          13.75
    MIXTURE TEMPERRTURE:   104.5
    HUMIDITY  (Relative):   52. 54*
    ROLL  REVOLUT I ONS :   23409 . 00
                                 RNRLYTICRL DRTR
                                   28.0 PPPI
                                   10.6 PPivi
                                  322.9 PPPI
     C H R B 0 N  M 0 H 0 XID E (b a c k -g r o u n d):    1. 3 P P PI
,  .   CRRBOH  DIOXIDE (exhaust):     1.2050 '/.
~  ^   CRRBOH  DIOXIDE (background):  0.0330 "•;
     H' i' D R 0 C R R B U N S  (e x h a u s t):
f  
-------
                                   ]29
                                       130
                                                                      59
                          EG&G  flUTOMOTIVE RESEflRCHj  INC.

                              FEDERflL'TEST PR0CEDURE

                       1973  IJRBRH DYHRMOMETER EMISSION TEST
                                                             PRGE  1  OF 2
m
TEST HO:

PROJECT:

VEHICLE:
    01

799912
TEST DflTE:

REPT DflTE:

ODOMETER:
                                                                   6-15-79
                                                                   7-88-79
                                                                   -7 •-! "J -7
                                                                   r o i r
=3

n
.a
HUMIDITY(Ro.-H)
MIXTURE TEMP(PTI)
BfiRQMETER IH-HG(Pb)
            RMBIENT CONDITIONS

                  PHflSE  1

               65.14   92.96
                    105.80
                    29. 16
      PHflSE 3

    4.13   97,
       185.88
        29. 15
T!
      PRESSURES:
      INLET/OUTLET
      BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
      VOCCU.FT./REV.)
      VMIX (CU.FT.>
      ZH(RPM)
      XO
      MILES/BflG
      HCE/HCD  (PPM)
      COEM/CODM(PPM)
      NOXE/NOXD(PPM)
      CQ2E/C02B  (';)
                                     CVS DftTfl

                                 PHRSE I       PHflSE 2
                                                        PHflSE 3
                        12.98    3.45   12.98   3.45  12.98   3.45
18814
2544.37
8. 08^215
3.561
17216
8. 295690
4374. 2 6
i 1 i-i 1-1 •-, 1-1

3 . 8 5 0
10020
8 . 2956 8 8
2545. 63
1 183. 33
Fl . Fi Fl H '"' 1 5
3. 555
                                 RNFiLYTICflL  BflTfl
                        129.42
                        578.58
                         62.'? 8
                   1.26  339.02
                   1.10   19.28
                   8. 04    0.76
t' ป
•"'
8 ,
8.
69
Dil
58
85
57.
288.
cr -?
•J i .
1.
67
63
18
11
r .
1.
1.
8.
19
26
18
84
      HC  (GRRMS/TEST PHflSE)
      CO  (GRRMS/TEST PHflSE)
      NOX (GRflMS/TEST PHflSE)
      C02 (GRRMS/TEST PHflSE)
      FUEL ECONOMY  (MPG)
                                 TEST  PHRSE  RESULTS
                                     COLD  STfiRT
                                     TRflHSIENT
                                     (FHRSE  1)
                                            COLD STflRT
                                            STRBILIZED
                                            
•^i •-(
"I
1413
21
. 124
. 467
. 665
. 1 8 1
.665

-------
 |:l                                      131
 :•••'


 T>                         EG&G flUTOMOTIVE RESEflRCHj  INC.           PRGE 2 OF 2
 i;

                               FEDERRL TEST PROCEDURE


 ^                      1973 IJRBRN DYNRMOMETER  EMISSION  TEST
 •'•9


 i;:j    TEST  NO:           01                           TEST DflTE:     6-15-79


      PROJECT:       790912                           REPT Dfl'fE:     7-03-79


 "H    VEHICLE:         33                    '         ODOMETER :7377.4
 a


 T!                                ~~ VEHICLE  DflTfl

 •9
      VEHICLE MRKE:                    FORD



 -g!    MODEL YEflR/MODEL:               1979 PINTO



I |!;i   VEHICLE I.D. NUMBER:            9T18Y146233


f ป|
[  !|    ENGINE SERIRL NUMBER:



[ 1    INERT IR WEIGHT:   3000  POUNDS





[ 111                             WEIGHTED  MRSS EMISSIONS


r             TEST  RESULTS                              1973  EPFi  STRNDRRDS
I  71          	                              	

L- k    HC:    0.746  GRRMS.--MILE                       HC:    1.5  GRRMSIMILE



;  j    CO:    10.696  GRRMS/MILE                       CO:   15.0  GRRMS/MILE



  ||    HOX:    1.362  GRRMS/MILE                       NOX:   2.0  GRRMS/MILE



 >]    C02:  421.430  GRRMS/MILE
   I



  _    U R B H N FUEL  E C 0 H0 M Y:  28.12 MIL E S/GR L L 0 N


 " :"lป

       COMMENTS:



  *    QUflLITY CONTROL VERIF I CRT I ON:



 • J

-------
                 E  G & G flUTOMOTIVE RESEft&*ftป  i,.
                  1978 Highway  Fuel Economy   Test

  'Test- Nฐ:         01                            Test Date:   86/15/79
 yProject:     798912                            Report Date:   86/13/79
 m 'v' * h i r-1 *:         3 3                            M i 1 e a 3 e:     7: j 9 8. 8
 i
 '^                            Test  Do.to.
 <$!                                 	^	t.  s
      B1 o w e r  R e '•.•' o 1 u t i o n s: "  15 8~9~5
 ]'    Baroivieter  :  29. 17
      Blower  Pressures:
 • *n    i n 1 e t / o u t let          12.98   3. 4 c>
 m
      N i x t u r e T e ivi P e r a t u re:   18 9. 8
 IjJ    Huniditv  (Relative):   53.34*
      Roll  Re M o1u t i o n s:   2 3 614.88
[.I
*j
•4
                            finalyt ico. 1 Data
     H y d r o c a r b o n s (e x h a u s t):        2 2. 5 P P n
     H y d r o c a r b o n s (b a c k s r o u n d):      9.2 P P n
     C a r b o n  M o n o x i d e (e x h o. u s t):     31. 7 P P c\
     C o. r b o n  M o n o x i d e (b a c k •=" r o u n d):    8. 3 P P n
     C a r b o n  D i o :•••: i d e (e x h o. u s t):      1.7118 ';
     Carbon  Dioxide (background):  8.8428 ';

                      T e s t.  R e s. u 11 s  (g r o. r i -- / \<\ \ 1 e .:•
     HC:     6.839
     CO:     8.954
     C02:  326.643
     C a 1c u1 a t e d F u el E c o n o Ny:   27.88  MP G


         Co rn'lent s:
  • SKiT-tW'-'^e'Wi -v-

-------
T!
                                        133
                           EGkG  HUTUMOTIVE RESEARCH? INC.

                               FEDERRL TEST PROCEDURE

                        1973  LIRBRH BYNflMOMETER EMISSION  TEST
                                                            PRGE  1  OF  2
      TEST NO:

      PROJECT:

      VEHICLE:
                 82
             796912
         TEST DflTE:

         REPT DflTE:

         ODOMETER:
            6-16-79

            7-63-79

            7419.0
      ซL!MIDITY(Ra-H)
      HIXTURE  TEMF(PTn
      BftRQMETER  IN-HG^PtO
                                 RflBIENT CONDITIONS

                                       PHRSE 1
                             57.35
75. 65
                                 104.50
                                  29. 10
   PHRSE 3

55.39   72,01
    105.00
     29.03
h
I. ,j
       PRESSURES:
       IHLE TV OUTLET
       BLOWER  REVOLUTIONS
       VO i r
45
215
hi

;'-" „ R 9
8 . 6 3
8. 68
8 . 8 4
2.98 3.40
10023
Pi -Oder ฃ70
2539.34
1133.45
fi . fi fi fi 2 1 ~<
•-i cr -7 cr
•-' . •-' r -J

52.47 6.
245.16 0.
59.30 1.
1.12 0.







79
63
80
84
 ssrs
h
L;y
HC  (GRRMS.--TEST PHRSE)
CO-  (GRRMS/TEST PHRSE)
HOX 
-------
.TSJ
 i

[r?
r*1
Li
L3
                                       134
                         EG&G flUTOMOTIVE RESEflRCHi INC.

                             FEDERRL TEST PROCEDURE

                      1973 URBflN DYNflMOMETER EMISSION  TES"
                                                     PflGE 2 OF 2
      TEST NO:           0;
      PROJECT:       79091:
      VEHICLE:
                     33
                                       TEST DflTE:      6-16-79

                                       REPT DflTE:      7-0:3-79

                                       ODOMETER :7419.0
                                   VEHICLE  DflTfl
                                       FORD

                                      1979 PINTO

                                       9T18Y146233
     VEHICLE MflKE:

     MODEL YEflR/MQDEL:

     VEHICLE I.D.  NUMBER:

     ENGINE SERIflL NUMBER:

     IHERTIfl WEIGHT:   3000 POUNDS                              *'  '


                             WEIGHTED  MflSS  EMISSIONS
            TEST RESULTS                             1973 EFR STflNDflRDS
     HC:    ff.711 GRflMS/MILE                       HC:   1.5 GRflMS/MILE
      CO:    19.999 GRflMS/MILE
      NOX
1.713 GRflMS/MILE
                                      CO:   15.0 GRflMS/MILE
NOX:   2.0 GRflMS/MILE
T3     COS:  423.733  GRflMS/MILE
       URBflH FUEL ECONOMY:   ฃ0.01 MILES.-"GFiLLON
       COMMENTS:
       Q U fl LIT Y C 0 N T R 0 L V E RIFIC fl T10 N:

-------
T|  J
                                            135
                  E G  &  G  flUTOMOTIVE  RESEflRCHi  INC.
   '                1978  Highway Fuel  Economy   Te-=.t.


  1
   * Test  No:        " 02                             T   *  r,
J                    "                              Test  Date:   06/16/79
: Hi! Project:     79991?                             D
3' j:: i                "                                Re P- o r t D n. t. e:      8 6 /18
    Vehicle:         33                             M.,
  n                                                 Mileage:     7431.2
   "*    Bio w e r~  R e'.,' o 1 u t i o n s:   15127

  T-    Baropieter (corr) :   29.88
  is
       B1 o w e r  F' r e- s s u res:
f .-ป    i n 1 e t / o u 11 e-1          12. 9 0  ''•. 4 s
rs
  ^: r    Mi x t u r e T e PI P e r a t u re:   18 9. 8

f ^    Hupiiditv (Relative):   44.67";
1 I
       R o 11  Re'.,' o 1 u t i on s:   23661. ft ft

h
  &
                              Analytical  Data

  {;•..    Hydrocarbons (exho.ust):         19.4 PPPI
* --• f t *.
  fj..*
       H y d r o c a r b o n s < b a c k. g r o u n d):       6. 3 P p PI
[ '*!
L ^    Uarbon  Monoxide (exhaust):      73.7 PPPI

r      C a r" b o n  M o n o x i d e (b a c k g r n i n~i d):     ft.:'-' p P PI
i  7!
!' :.S    C a r b o n  D i o x i d e (e x h a u s t):      i. 6 9 1 y ";

       C a r b o n  D i o x i d e (b a c k g r o u n d):   8. 8 4 5 8 "'.
~~\m


                        T e- s t  R e s u 11. s (g r a PI s / PI i 1 e-)
•  ^
       HC:      8.835
  *3
-•+.     CO:      8.365

       C02:   321.132
  i
  3    C a 1 c u 1 a t e d F u e 1  E c o n o PI y:   27.4 3  M P G

  •ซn
  -I

           U o PI PI e n t s:

-------
                                        136
SSJ
       TEST  NO:

       PROJECT:

       VEHICLE:
                           EG&G  flUTOMOTIVE RESEflRCHj  INC.

                               FEDERflL TEST PROCEDURE

                        1978 URBflN  BYHfiMOMETER EMISSION TEST
                  03

              7 99'? 12
                       TEST  DflTE:

                       REPT  DflTE:

                       ODOMETER:
                                                            PflGE 1 OF 2
                        6-20-79

                        7-03-79

                        7470.4
       HUMIDITY(Ra-H)
       MIXTURE TEMPCPTD
       BflROMETER IN-HG
                          flMEIENT CONDITIONS

                                PHflSE 1

                             74.62  105.44
                                 105. 00
                                  29.04
                             PHflSE 3

                          73.13  103.64
                              104.30
                               29.05
r?  1
4  *
PRESSURES:
INLET/OUTLET
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
VO
        CO   (GRflMS/TEST  PHflSE)
        NOX  (GRflMS/TEST  PHflSE)
        C02  (GRflMS/TEST  PHflSE)
        FUEL ECONOMY  (MPG)
                                  TEST  FHflSE RESULTS
                                      COLD STflRT
                                            COLD  STflRT
                                 HOT  STflRT
                                         ZE
KrINoihH 1
PHflSE 1)
4. 170
42.482
9.069
1602. 161
13.893
bl HbiLlihJJ
(PHflSE 2)
0.775
15.010
4.911
1642.093
28.518
S IHBILIi
(PHflSE :]
1 . 337
14.569
o =; ••:• o
o • •-' i o
1489. 386
21.933

-------
 m
[I

[1
ri?
                                        137


                           EG&G  RIJ TO MOTIVE RESEARCH?  INC.


                              FEDERRL  TEST  PROCEDURE


                        1978  URBRN  DYHflMOMETER  EMISSION  TEST
                                                            PRGE 2 OF 2
       TEST  NO:


       PROJECT:


       VEHICLE:
              790912
TEST BfiTE:      6-20-79


REPT DflTE:      7-03-79


ODOMETER :7470.4
                                      1979 PINTO



                                       9T10V14623:
                             VEHICLE DRTR


VEHICLE MflKE:       '  	"



MODEL YERR/MODEL:



VEHICLE I.D. NUMBER:



ENGINE SERIRL NUMBER:



INERT IR WEIGHT:   3000 POUNDS





                        WEIGHTED MRSS EMISSIONS


      TEST  RESULTS                             1978 EPR STRNDRRDS


HC:    0.448 GRRMS/MILE                      HC:   1.5 GRRMS/MILE
       CO:    5.5S9 GRRMS/MILE
       NOX:   1.848 GRRMS/MILE
       C 0 2: 421.8 25 G RR M S/MILE
       URBflN FUEL ECONOMY:  28.53 MILES/GRLLON
       COMMENTS:
       Q U R LIT Y C 0 N T R 0 L V E RIFIC R T10 H:
                                              CO:   15.8  GRRMS/MILE
                                              NOX:   2.0  GRRMS/MILE


-------
 „
I 'ป
r- Tl
                                         138.
                 E G & G flU TO MOTIVE  RESEflRCHป INC
           1978  Highway Fuel Econopiv   Test
Test Ho:
t|j Project :
. ซn Vehicle:
03
798712
33
                                                 Test  Date:    6-26-79

                                                 Report  Date:    6-28-79

                                                 Mileage:     7493.3
 :
Lซ
Q;-
                       Test Da to.

B 1 o w e r R e ••,' o 1 u t i o n s :   151 3 3

B o. r o PI e t e r ( c o r r )  :  2 9 . 8 7

B 1 o w e r P r e •=. s u r e s :
i n 1 e t / o u t let          1 3 . 6 8  3 . 3 8

M i x t u r e T e PI P e r a t u r e :   111.1

HuniditY (Relative):   65.78";

R o 11 Re v o 1 u t i o n s :  237 9 3 . 8 8


                      Analytical  Data

H Y d r o c a r b 6 n s  ( e x h a u s t ) :         2 8 . 7 P P PI

H y d r o c a r b o n s  ( b a c k •? r o u ri d > :     19.1 P P PI

C a t~ b o n  M o n o x i d e   ( e x h o. u s t ) :     52.6 P P PI

C a r b o n  M o n o x i d e  ( b o. c k -3 r o u n d ) :    0 . 8 P P PI

Carbon  Dioxide (exhaust):      1.7458 ";

C a r b o n  D i o x i d e ( b a c k •? r o u n d ) :   8.84 8 6 '••.
                        T e s t  R e s u 1 1 s ( 9 r a PI s •••' PI i 1 >

       HC:    8.873

       CO:    8.684

       C02:  326.917

       C a 1 c u 1 a t e d  F u e 1  E c o n o PI y :  27.03  M P G
  Tj
           CopiPients:

-------
                          EG&G flUTOMOTIVE RESEflRCHj INC.

                              FEDERfiL TEST PROCEDURE

                       197S IJRBRN DYHflNOMETER EMISSION TEST
                                                            PRGE 1 OF 2
      TEST NO:

      PROJECT:

      VEHICLE;
                  84
              798912
TEST DflTE:

REPT DflTE:

ODOMETER:
6-21-79

7-Q3-79

7517.5
      HUMIDITV(Ra-H)
      MIXTURE TEMP(PTI)
      BHROMETER iN-HG

VMIX (CU.FT.) ZN(RPM) XO MILES/BflG HCE/HCD (PPM) COEN/CODM(PPM) NOXE/NOXIKPPM) C02E/C02D (';) CVS DflTfl PHflSE 1 ' PHflSE 2 PHflSE 3 13.71 3 9992 8.29433 2589. 1136.3 8 . y y y ii 3.574 HHflLY 18 5 ;:;fi l 723.49 56.8 8 1 . 23 . 35 1 9 87 ~i i! i TICflL 2 . 2 '^ 3.15 1.48 8 . 0 5 . o . r 1 o . 17195 8.294339 4317.3 1136.33 0. 88822 •_' • 'i' •_' r DflTfi 13.23 1 122. 18 19. 68 8.75 35 1 1 1 8 , 83 8. 9u 8. 84 3.71 3 . 18886 8. 294364 2589. 9 1136.33 0. 8y022 3.573 58. 73 318.82 55. 58 1 . 18 •-, Cj 1 1 1.28 8.8 4 HC ':.GRflMS/TEST PHflSE) CO (GRflMS/TEST PHflSE) NOX


-------
fi.
r
 55=5



 .<*
 •?
L i
rฎ
MSJ
                                       140






                          EG&G flUTOMOTIVE RESEflRCHj INC.



                              FEDERflL TEST PROCEDURE



                       1978 URBflN DYNHMOMETER EMISSION TEST
                                                                   PflGE 2 OF 2
      TEST NO:



      PROJECT:



      VEHICLE:
                         84



                     790912
TEST DHTE:      6-21-79



REPT DHTE:      7-03-79



ODOMETER =7517.5
      VEHICLE MfiKE:
      MODEL YEflR/MODEL:
      VEHICLE  I.D. NUMBER:
      ENGINE SERIflL NUMBER
                                    VEHICLE DflTfl



                                       FORD




                                      1979 PINTO





                                       9T10Y146233
       INERT IR WEIGHT:   3000 POUNDS







                               N EIG H T E D M H S S  E MIS S10 N S



             TEST RESULTS                            1978  EF'H  STflNDRRDS



       HC:    8.438 GRflMS/MILE      '                HC:    1.5  GRflMS/MILE
       CO:     7.3S5 GRflMS/MILE
       NOX:    1.317 GRflMS/MILE
       C02:  411.735 GRflMS/MILE
       URBflM FUEL ECONOMY:-  20. SS MILES/GflLLON
       COMMENTS:
                                                     CO:   15.6  GRflMS/MILE
                                                     NOX:   2.0 GRflMS/MILE
       Q U H LIT Y C 0 N T R 0 L V E R IF IC H T 10 N:

-------
r',:                                          1A1
 :-,:               E G  &  G flUTOMOTIVE RESEflRCHj   INC.
                   1978 H i -=ihway  Fuel Econonv  Test
Test No:
Project:
Vehicle:
84
798912
33
                                                    Test Date:    6-21-79

                                                    Report  Date:    6-22-79

                                                    Mileage:     7540.3
                            -   T*s4

 1]    B1 o w e r R e '•.•' o 1 u t i o n s:   1513 4
  I
       Be. r o n e t e r (c o r r) :  29. 0 5
 *j              „
  |    B1 o w e r F r e s s u r e s:
       i n 1 e t.-" o u t let           13. 6 7  3. 3 8

 iฃ    Mixture Ter-iPerature:   111.1
 >v'

       Hy IM i d i t y (R e 1 a t i <•.> e):   68. 3 6 "•;

 .|    Roll Re y o 1 u t i o n s:   2 3 7 3 2. 8 8


 ,'1                       '    final ytical  Data
 jSpB
 . .f' ~
       Ky d r o c a r b o n s < e x h a u s t):        19.4 P P IM

 ^    H y d r o c a r b o n s (b a c k •? r o u n d):      9. 3 P P IM

 . w    C a r b o n f'1 o n o x i d e (e x h a u s t >:     71.1 P P n

 ^ -^    Ca r b o n M o n o x i d e (b a c k g r o u n d):    8. 8 P P I'M

 p    Ca r b o n D i o x i d e < e x h a u s t >:      1.7 8 3 8 .".'

       C a r b o n D i o x i d e < b a c k •? r o u n d):   8.8518 "•;

 •*i
  j

                        T e s t  R e s u 11 s  (-g r o. n s •••'' r-i i 1 e-)

  J    HC:    0.863

 . ;.,    CO:    0.312

 -":    C02:   317.651

  :TTI    C o. 1 c u 1 a t e d  F u e 1  E c o n o I'M y:  27.79  11P G
            L- o I'M ivi e n t s:

-------
0=1
                        142

   EG&G flUTOMOTIVE RESEflRCH?  INC.

       FEDERflL TEST PROCEDURE

1978 URBflN DYNflMOMETER  EMISSION  TEST
                                                           PflGE 1 OF 2
•** TEST NO:
<;• PROJECT:
''•t
F;ii
l:-1 VEHICLE:
01
790912


73'
 1UMIDITY
                          flMBIEHT CONDITIONS
 47.83    60.. 10
     105.OO
      •?Q •??
                                                 TEST BflTE:

                                                 REPT DflTE:

                                                 ODOMETER:
                              PHflSE 3

                              60.63   31
                                  105.00
                                   29.27
                                                 6-14-79

                                                 6-15-79

                                                  429.6
 PRESSURES:
• f NLET/OLITLET
 BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
 SG
 .MMIX (CU.FT. )
 ZN(RPM)
 :.xn
 •:::!lLES/BflG
      CVS DflTfl

  --PHflSE 1 —
12.95   3.35
    10013
  0.295737
    2554.93
   1183.39
   8. O O O 214
                                        --PHflSE 2--
                                       — PHflSE 3 —
                       12.95   3.35
17171
0.295787
4381.46
1188.39
0.000214
9975
0.295787
2545.29
1138.39
O. 00021 4
                           3.343
 HCE/HCD
 IOXE/NOXD(FPM)
!502E/C02D  <••:)
L
            flNHLYTICHL DflTfl

         130.33  11.30   53.39
J2.S0
 1.62
                                 5. 05
                                 O. 70
                                 0. 0 4
                         12.90
                         24.30
                          1.03
8.51  163.90
1.37  159.02
0. 50   41 „ 70
0.05    1.42
                         TEST  PHflSE  RESULTS
           COLD STflRT
           TRflNSIENT
             
                COLD  STflRT
               STflBILIZED
                   (PHflSE ;
                                        3.01
                                        O. 70
                                        0.05
    HOT STflRT
   STflBILIZED
        
-------
 a
                                 143
             EGfeG  RUTOMOTIVE RESERRCH?  INC.

                FEDERRL  TEST PROCEDURE

          1973  URBflN DYNRMOMETER EMISSION TEST
                                                           PRGE 2 OF 2
  TEST NO:
;||: PROJECT:
  VEHICLE:
               01
           790912
           .    73
                                                 TEST DRTE:     6-14-79
                                                 REPT DRTE:     6-15-79
                                                 ODOMETER  : 429.6
f" i' 1
I W)
u
ns
a
 L -t
                            VEHICLE DRTR
                                      FORD
                                  1979 FRIRMONT
                                    F9K92F1875517
VEHICLE MRKE:

MODEL YERR/nODEL:

VEHICLE I.D. NUMBER:

ENGINE SERIflL NUMBER:

INERTIR WEIGHT:   3500 POUNDS


                 NEIGHTED  MRSS  EMISSIONS

     TEST  RESULTS                   1973 EPR STRNDRRDS

HC:     1.406 GRRMS/MILE    •          HC:    1.5 GRRMS/MILE
 CO:     4.409  GRRMS/MILE

 NOX:    1.401  GRRMS/MILE

 C02:  561.899  GRRMS/MILE

 IJRBRH FUEL ECONOMY:   15.47 MILES/GRLLON

 COMMENTS:

 QURLITY CONTROL VERIFICATION:
                                           C 0:   15.0 GRR M S/MILE

                                           NOJi:   2.0 GRRMS/MILE

-------
                                           144

                 E G &  G  HUTUMOTIVE  RESEflRCH?  INC.

I  ^
                  1978  H i 3h wa y F u el  E co nony  T e st
|  !TJ

  *3
   T-'--t- Ho:         81                            Test  Date:   86/14/79

  ^Project:     798912                            Report Date:   86/18/79

  ^V e f-i i c 1 e:         73                            Mil e a •? e:       4 2 9. 6



r j>                         .  T€-.s.t  Eat'*--, .-

1  "1   Blower Revolutions:  15115

      B a r on e t e r  (c o r r) :   29.27

      B1 o w e r P r e s s u r e s:
| . |i   inlet /out let          12. 88   3. 48

      Mi x t u r e T e r i P e r a t. u re:  18 5. 8

|  &j   Humidity (Relative):  54.89';

      Ro 11  Revo 1ut i ons:   23759.88


                             finalyt ioal Do.to.

  ]i:   H y d r o c a r b o n s  < e x h a u s t):       124. 8 P P n

      H y d r o o o. r b o n s  •-. b a c [•• •? r o u n d):      7. 3 P P I'M

  lj   C a r b o n M o n o x i d e (e- x h a u s t):     15.9 P P n

  ^   C o. r b o n M o n o x i d e (b o. c k g r o u n d):   2, 7 P P n

  •3   C a r b o n D i o x i d e  (e x h a u s t >:      2. 8 9 5 8  '•;

  ; -   C a r b o n D i o x i d e  (b a c k •? r o u n d):  8. 8 4 2 8  '•.'
  i .

  •*T
  ^                     T e s t R e s u 11 s (•? r o. n s / r-i i 1 e')

       HC:    8.748

  :.:i    CO i    8. 161

       C02:   488.887
  ig?
       C a 1 o u i a ted F u el E o o n o r-i y:   21.59   M F G
           Coivnvient si

-------
                                 145
                    EG&G flUTOhOTlv'E  RE-SuFi-1"'-<  iM1"-

                        FEDERRL TEST PROCEDURE

                 1973 LIRBRN DYNflMQMETER  EMISSION TEST
                                          1  OF 2
TEST NO:
PROJECT:
VEHICLE:
02
798912
73
                                               TEST DflTE:

                                               REPT DflTE:

                                               ODOMETER:
                                      6-15-79

                                      7-08-79

                                       483.Q
HUMIDITY(Ra-H)
MIXTURE TEMP
 NOXE/HOXDCPPM)
 C02E.--C02D  ('•;>
        CVS DRTfl

    PHflSE 1       PHflSE 2
                                                        PHflSE 3
12.00   3,40  12.00   3.40  12.00   3.40
9985
0.297279
2565. 76
1190.90
O.flMfiJflft .

•-: h o •"'
ซ_* • O r_l .•_
flNRLYTIC
56
17
36
~I
.95
.91
. 10
. 68
12.
1.
0,
0.
.:,
8
RL
9
9
50
ฃ1
5
17203
0.297279
4420.51
1 190. 90
fi

DflTfl
63.
14.
25.
1.
9999
0.297279
2567.09
fi 0 o ::' fl :r: i7i . o fi o >• n s
i

.-,
6
;::6 -

1
f.
90
0
1
')

9.
i!
0.
0.


72
39
50
05
".-."

132.
119.
40.
1.
591 "

99
14
50
44
                                        3.82
                                        2. 19
                                        0.30
                                        0.05
 HC  
 CO  CGRflMS/TEST' PHflSE
 NOX 
> 13.
57.
. <=: ,
319
444
01.0
."•. ( /
•^'-i
i.
5 .
921
804
939
5.
9.
5.
246
448
71 i

-------
                                        146
 N
r
i,ซi
  •-;!
 D?
 lif
 [<
                          EGS,G HUTOMOTIVE RESERRCHj INC.
                              FEDERRL TEST PROCEDURE
                       197S LIRBRN DYNRMOMETER EMISSION TEST
                                                                    PRGE  2  OF 2
TEST NO!
PROJECT:
VEHICLE:
                         02
                     790912
                                                    TEST DfiTE:      6-15-79
                                                    REPT DflTE:      7-98-79
                                                    ODOMETER  :483.0
*     VEHICLE MflKE:
(.*?*
i     MODEL YERR,-'MODEL:

      VEHICLE I.D. NUMBER:

*1     ENGINE SERIRL NUMBER
                                    VEHICLE  DRTfi
                                        FORD

                                    1979 FRIRMONT

                                        9K92F137551
      INERT Ifl WEIGHT:   3500  POUNDS

                               WEIGHTED  MflSS EMISSIONS
            TEST RESULTS                             197S EPR STRNDRRDS
      HC:     1.520  GRRMS/MILE                      HC:    1.5 GRRMS/MILE
      CO:     4.269  bRflMS/MILE
       NOX
               1.520 GRRMS/MILE
                                                    15.8 GRRMS/MILE
                                              NOX:  2.9  GRRMS/MILE
       C02:  565.543 GRRMS/MILE

       IJRBRN FUEL ECONOMY:   15,37 MILES/GRLLON

       COMMENTS:

       Q U R L IT Y C 0 N T R 0 L V E RIFIC R TI 0 N:

-------
                                          147'
"n


M
r.
   Test No:
n,
[Project:
   Vehicle:
                 E  G & G flUTOMOTIV.-.  Sr-SCRRCH)  INC
                  1978 Hi 3 h w o. y  F u el  E c o n o ivi Y   T e s t
                   82



               796912
                    r o
Test Date:   06.•••'15/79



R e P o r t D a t e:   O 6 /18 / 7 9



Mileage:      483.0
  -
i.
                             Test  Data



     B1o we r  R e yo1u t i o n s:   15120



     B a r o n e t e r  < c o r r) :  29.27



     Blower  Pressures:

     in let/out let           12.00   3.40



     M i x t u r e T e ivi P e r a t u re:   10 5. 0



     Hupiiditv  (Relative):   52.96'-:



     R o 11  R e'.,' o I u t i o n s:   24074.00





                            finalyt. ical Data



     H y d r o c o. r b o n •=• (e x h a u s t):        73. 5  P P r i



     H y d r o c a r b o n s (b a c k 3 r o u n d):  •    7. 8  P P IYI



     C a r b o n  M o n o x i d e  (e- x h a u s t):     19. 8  P P n



     C a r b o n  f'1 o n o x i d e  (b a c k ? r o u n d):    1.1 P P PI



     C a r b o n  D i o x i d e  (e x h a u s t):      2.1590  •"••:



     C a r b o n  D i o x i d e  (b a c k 9 r o u n d):  0. 0 510  .'•;







                       T e- s t  R e s u 11 s  (•? r a n s. / ivt i 1 e)



     HO:     0.413



     CO:     0.221



     C02:   413.918



     C a 1 c u 1 a t e d F u e 1  E c o n o PI y:   21.34  M P G
 -m
           Coivi merits:

-------
.•Si
                                       148
7'

 i
   EG&G HUTOMOTIVE RESEARCH? !):•_.

       FEDERflL TEST PROCEDURE

1973 URBflN DYNflMOMETER EMISSION TEST
                                                                  PflGE 1 OF 2
TEST NO:

PROJECT:

VEHICLE:
    03

790912
                                                    TEST DflTE:

                                                    REPT DRTE:

                                                    ODOMETER:
                                             6-20-79

                                             7-03-79
                                              523.2

     HUMIDITY(Ro.-H)
     MIXTURE  TEMP(PTI)
     BfiROMETER  IN-HG(Pb)
      PRESSURES:
      INLET/OUTLET
      BLOWER  REVOLUTIONS
      VO
i .
46.
4.
895.
14.
789
114
219
794
482
1.
8.
C]
ฃ. c. c r .
1 ^ .
787
714
•"i^n
621
181
o .
1 3 .
=;
•ป' •
1806.
17.
512
925
384
490
163
                                                                            *-~'''^^

-------
f w
' -
                                        149

                          EG&G RUTOMOTIVE RESEflRCH?  INC.
                              FEDERRL TEST PROCEDURE
                       1978 IJRBRN DYNRMOMETER  EMISSION  TEST
                                              PRGE  2  OF  2
      TEST NO:
      PROJECT:
      VEHICLE:
    03
790912
      VEHICLE MflKE:
1 4    MODEL YEflR/MODEL:

[N    VEHICLE  I.D.  NUMBER:

f'f'l    ENGINE SERIRL NUMBER:
L:y
fV,    INERT Ifl  WEIGHT:    3500 POUNDS
               VEHICLE DflTfl
                  FORD

               1979 FfllRMONT

                 9K92F18755 IF
TEST DRTE: .    6-20-79
REPT DRTE:     7-93-79
                                ODOMETER  :528.2
                               WEIGHTED MRSS EMISSIONS
             TEST RESULTS                            1973 EPR STflNDfiRDS
       HC:     0.951  GR RMS/MILE                      HC:   1.5 GRflMS/MILE
       CO:     3.356 GRflMS/MILE
       NOX:    1.454 GRflMS/MILE
       CG2:  563.059 GRflMS/MILE
       IJRBRN FUEL ECONOMY:  15.50 MILES/GflLLOH
       COMMENTS:
       Q U R LIT Y C 0 N T R 0 L V E RIF IC R T10 N:
                                CO:   15.0 GRRMS/MILE
                                NOX:   2,9 GRflMS/MILE

-------

                                          150
                 E G 8. G flUTOMQTIVE RESEflRCH?  INC
                  1 9 7 8 H i 9 h w o. y F u el E c o ft o ivi y  . T e s t
 dlest Ho:
r;,: Project:
| bra
 33 Vehicle:
            .03
         798912
            973
                                                   Test  Dn.te:    6/20, -'79
                                                   Report Date:    6/20/79
                                                   Mileage:      549.6
Q
[;
                     -   Te-st M'tcf" :
B1 ow e r R e v o 1 u t i o n s'   1518 4
BaroFieter  (corr) :  29.07
Blower Pressures:
i n1et/ou tlet           13.6 8  3.4 8
M i x t u r e T e FI P e r o. t. u r e:   111. 8
H HUB i d i t y (R e 1 a t i u e):   47. 6 3 '/.
Roll Revo 1ut ions:   22581.80

                       finalyt, ico.l  Data
H yd r o c a r b o n s < e x h a u s t >:       49. 8  P P FI
H v d x o c a r b o n s (b o. c k -=1 r o u n d ':>'     6. 8  P P FI
C a ribo n M o n o x i d e  (e x h a u s t >:    14.8  P P FI
C a rfc o n M o n o x i d e  •'. b a c k -9 r o u n d):    1. 6 P P FI
C a rfa-o n D i o x i d e  (e x h a u s t') •     2. 8 8 9 8 '•-.
C a r to o n D i o x i d e  (b o. c k •? r o u n d >:  8.8 5 3 8 .'•:
                        T e s t R e s- u 11 s (9 r a FI •=• / FI i 1 e').
       HC:    U.274
       CO:    8. 152
       C02:  411.204
       C a 1 c u 1 a t e d  F u e 1 E c o n o FI y:   21.51  M P G
           C o FI FI e n t s:

-------
                                       151
                          EG&G HLiTuriLiTIVE  RESEARCH,  INC.

                              FEDERflL  TEST PROCEDURE

                       1978 URBfiN  DVHflMOMETER EM I SSI OH TEST
                                                                   PflGE 1 OF
       EST HO:

[""f!
 '~!S
n
[i
n
 a
 si
.•M
 -Mi
      PROJECT:

      VEHICLE:
                       - 04

                    790912
      HUMiraTYCRa-H)
      MIXTURE  TEMP
      BHROMETER  IH-HG^PLO
      PRESSURES:
      INLET/OUTLET
      BLOWER  REVOLUTIONS
      VO
       C02E/C02I)  •::;•;)
                                  RMRLYTICFiL. DRTfl

                              132.37  13.77   27.57
                              557.34   1.89    3.23
                               23.10   1.70
                                1.66   0.0 4
       HC   GRRMS/TEST PHRSE>
       CO
       NOX
            GRfltlS/TEST PHRSE)
            GRRMS^TEST PHRSE)
       C02  GRRHS/TEST PHRSE)
       FUEL ECONOMY 
 10.94    74.38    9.62
  l.@9   151.74    0.32
  1.8y    34.80    1.00
  3.0;:t     1.45    0.04
                                 TEST PHRSE RESULTS

                                     COLD STRRT    COLD  STRR'
                                                                HOT STRRT
1
r





RRN
PHR

4

211
1
s
o
6
•"'
4
Q
4
IE
E
Q
rr
a *-'
• •-'
, '.•?
• tl
N
!
1
9

4
il
"7
T
1
j
o
-7
I1'
1
9
STREI
(PHRS
1
L 3
0.
6 .
d bl hi O B
15 =
L
^
.:,
•*i
j
cl
1
I

.-.,
3
.-(
T
y
fi
ZED
"-' 'i
C. .'
.-,
3
'-)
f,
ฃ,
STflB
(PHR
2 .
11.
CT
184l!
16.
ILI;
SE :]
699
924
376
964
391

-------
f

                                       152
                          EG&G flUTOf'IOTIVE  RESEfiRCHj  INC.
                              FEBERHL TEST PROCEDURE
                       1978 URBflH DYHfiMOMETER  EMISSION  TEST
                                                                   PflGE ฃ Oh
      TEST NO:
      PROJECT:
      VEHICLE:
                         04
                     790912
                                              TEST DFiTE:      6-21-79
                                              REPT DRTE:      7-09-79
                                              ODOMETER :565.0
       VEHICLE  MflKE:
       MODEL  YERR/MOBEL:
       VEHICLE I.D,  NUMBER:
       ENGINE SERIflL NUMBER
                                    VEHICLE IiflTH
                                       FORD

                                   1979 FRIRMONT

                                     FRK92F18755 IF
       INERT I H WEIGHT:    3500 POUNDS
HC:
             TEST  RESULTS
               13.783  GRfiMS/MILE
                               NEIGHTED MflSS EMISSIONS
                                                      1978
                                                    HC:
       CO:    3.499
l&     NOX:   1.501 GRRMS/MILE

f^     C02: 567,552 GRflMS/MILE
      EPR STRNDRRDS
      1.5 GRflMS/MILE

CO:   15.0 GRflMS/MILE

NOX:   2.0 GRflMS/MILE
       URBHN FUEL ECONOMY:   15.41 MILES/GRLLON
       COMMENTS:

  .S
        Q U R LI T Y  C 0 N T R 0 L  V E R IFIC fl T 10 N :

-------
                 E G &  G Rijl'iJMO
                                           15.3
                  1978  Highway Fuel  Eoonony   Tes
HTest No:          04



 P r o o e c t!     79 8 912
                                                   T e ฃ t D ate!    6 - 21 - 7 9



                                                   Report  Date:    6-21-79



                                                   Mi lea-ge:      584. 9
  1
  4
1  .-a
0
L :a





L :;;
I
L-
t:

U
                            Test  Da to.



    B1 o w e r  R e v o 1 u t i o n 2.:   1512 8



    B a r o r i e- t e t" (c o r r)  J  29. 8 9



    B1 o i.'.i e r  P r e s s u r e s:

    i n1e t/ou 11et          13.7 8   3.4 8



    M i x t u r e T e n P e r a r, u r e- J   117. 0



    Hufdditv (Relative):   52.4iE;';



    R o 11  Re'...' o 1 ij t i o ft s i  23726. 8 8





                           finalyt. ical Data



    H y d r o c a r" b o n s (e x h a u s t >:        3 9. 6  P P ivi



    H y d r o c a r b o n s < b a c k •? r o u n d):     18. 1  P P n



    C a r b o n  M o no xi d e  (ex ha u s t):     22.3  P P n



    C a r b o n M o n o x i d e  (b a c k g r o u n d):   3, 3 P P n



    C o. r b o n D i o x i d e < e x h a u s t):      2.15 8 8  "•;



    C a r b o n D i o x i d e < b a c. k -g r o u n d):  8.6518  .'•;







                      T * s t R e s u 11 •=. (•? r a ivi 2. ••••' ivi i i e ;>



    HC:     8.135



    CO:     8.221



    C025    399,646



    Calculated  Fuel  Econoirv:   22. 14  MPG
           U o ivi IYI e n t s i

-------
                                       154
                          EG&G fiUTQMQTIVE RESEARCH,  INC.

                              FEDERftL TEST PROCEDURE

                       1973 URBflN DYNflMQMETER EMISSION  TEST
                                                            PRGE  1 OF  2
      TEST HO:

      PROJECT:

      VEHICLE:
               79012
TEST DflTE:
REPT DflTE:
ODOMETER:
6-25-79
7-08-79
613. 3
      HUMIDITY(Ro.-H)
      MIXTURE TEMP(PTI)
      BflROMETER IN-HG(Pb)
                                      T' CONDITIONS

                                      PHflSE  1
          3   98,20
          185.80
                                                    PHflSE 3

                                                 68.08   33.4:
                                                      105.88
                                                      29. 17
r '-.;.
j *•*•
L ซ
PRESSURES:
INLET/OUTLET
BLONER REVOLUTIONS
VO(CU.FT./REV.>
VMIX OJU.FT.)
ZN(RPM)
XO
MILES.--BHG
       HCE/HCD   (PPM)
       COEH/CODMCPPM)
       NOXE/NOXIKPPM)
       Cn2E/C02B  (";>
                                      CVS  DflTfl

                                  PHflSE  1        PHflSE 2
                                      3.25
13.68

'  6.294728
    2439.88
    1136,73
    8,888219
13.68   3.25
    17387
  8,294728
    4371.38
   1136.73
   8.888219
                                                        PHflSE  3
3.25
13.68
     9994
  8. 294728
    2524.23
   1186.78


15
65
^

3. 4'
flNfl1
1.13
ii . •'j 'j
6 , 8 8
1.74
'._j '-.)
LYTI
11.
CT
•— ' •
8.
8 .

CflL
8 5
85
78
84
•-•
DflTfl
28.
•-i rr
! |~|
1 .
.36:]

54
84
48
84
S

•"• cr /"
2.17
8. 78
8. 84
3 .

63 .
122.
34.
1.
581

82
36
8 8
46


7
,-[ f
8.
8.


43
26
78
85
L .3
       HC
       CO
       NOX
     :GRHM3/TEST  PHfiSE)
     'GRflMS/TEST  PHflSE)
     :GRRMS/TEST  PHRSE)
       C02 (LRflMS/TEST PHflSE :•
       FUEL ECONOMY (MPG)
                           ThST  FHflSE  RE3UL

                              COLD  STflRT
                              TRANSIENT
                              (PHflSE  1)
                     COLD STflRT
                     STflBILIZED
                     (PHflSE 2)
                   HOT  STflRT
                   STflBILIZED
                   (PHflSE  3)
ฃl B
58.
3 .
194.
13.
738
176
965
6 4 9
548
0.
o *.
4 .
2291 .
14.
983
169
934
037
908
•~i
C- •
9.
4.
1358.
16.
323
463
O "7 O
734
957

-------
                                       155
/3
                          EG&L,  RUTOMOTIVE  RESERRCH.'  INC.
                             FEDERRL  TEST PROCEDURE
                       1973  URBRN  DVMRMOMETER EMISSION TEST
                                                                   PRGE 2  OF  2
                        05
                     79012
                      •70
     TEST NO:
     PROJECT:
     VEHICLE:


     VEHICLE MRKE:

'*    MODEL  V ERR/MODEL:

&    VEHICLE  I.D.  NUMBER:
|    ENGINE SERIfiL NUMBER:
2     INERT Ifl WEIGHT:    3500 POUNDS
                                   VEHICLE BRTR
                                      FORD

                                  1979 FfilRMONT

                                     9K92F137551F
                                                    TEST  DRTE:      6-25-79
                                                    REFT  DHTE:      7-03-79
                                                    ODOMETER  :S18.3
 fei
( qa
                              WEIGHTED MRSS EMISSIONS
            TEST RESULTS                             1973  EPR  STRNDRRDS
      HC:    9.634 GRRMS/MILE                       HC:    1.5  GRRMS/MILE
      CO:    4,633 GRRMS/MILE
       HOX:
              1 .277 GRRMS/MILE
      C 02: 579.163  G R R M S/MILE
       URBHN  FUEL  ECONOMY:   15.09  MILES/GflLLOH
       COMMENTS:
                                                    CO:  15.@ GRRMS/MILE
                                                    IOX:  ฃ.9 GRRMS/MILE
       Q U R LIT V C 0 N T R 0 L  V E RIFIC R T10 N :

-------
                                            156
                   c  G :i: G  AUTOMOTIVE RESEflRCHj  INC
                    197y Highi.oo.y Fuel  Econoiviy  Test
    Test  No:
    F r o. j e c 11
    Vehicle:
                  "   85
                 90912
                                              T e s t D i j. t e '    6-25-7 9
                                              Report- Date:    6-25-79
                                              Mileages      613.3
r
TT1
.*ป
                         Tti.t~tnj.rn.''1'
B1 o 1.0 e r  F: e v o 1 u t i o n s:   13 8 91
B o. r o ivi e t e r ''. c o f r.'' :  29,17
B1 o '.•.' e r  P r e s s u r e s:
i n 1 e t •••• o u 11 e t           13. 6 8  3.25
M i xt u re TepiPe rat u re:   185.8
H u PI i d i t. y < R e 1 a t i y e ':> '•   5 3. 6 9 "•;
R o 11  Re '•.•' o 1 u t i o n s:   236 9 9. 8 8

                        fin a 1 yt i cc. i  Data
H y d r o c a r b o n s  (e x h a u •=• t):         3 3, 2  P P PI
H y d r o c a r b o n s  (b a c k •? r o u n d) :      6. 3  P P PI
C a r b o n  M o n o x i d e  (e x h a u s  O :     47.2  P P PI
C a r b o n  M o n o x i d e  < b a c k •? r o u n d)'    3. 8 P P PI
C a r b o n  D i o x i d e  (e x h a u =. t.  ;•:      2.13 7 8 "•.'
C a r b o n  D i o x i d e  < b a c k •? r o u n d):   8.847 8 •'•;

                   T e s t  R e s u 11 s  '- •? r a PI s. •••" PI i 1 e >
HC:      8.163
CO:      8.519
002:   407.832
 C a 1 c u 1 o. t e d  F u el  E c o n o P'I y:   21.67  M P G

-------
                                        157'
                          EG&L, RUTOMOTIVE  RESEflRCHj  INC.

                              FEDERflL  TEST PROCEDURE

                        197:3  IJRBfiN  DYHflMOMETER  EMISSION TEST
                                                             PRGE  1  OF 2
 iw
TEST HO:

PROJECT:

VEHICLE:
06
TEST BflTE:

REPT DRTE:'

ODOMETER:
6-26-79

7-03-79

 6 49.0
       HUMIDITY(Ro.-H)
       MIXTURE  TEMP(FT I)
       BRROMETER  IH-HG(Pb)
                          RMBIENT CONDITIONS

                                 FHRSE  1

                              78.34   106.30
                                  105.50
                                  29.21
                                   PHHSE  3

                                53.26   90.19
                                    106.00
                                    29.20
[
1
       PRESSURES:
       INLET/OUTLET
       BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
       VCKCU.FT./REV. >
       VMIX (CU.FT.)
       ZN(RPM)
       XO
       MILE8/BRG
                                CVS  DRTR

                            PHRSE  1        PHRSE 2
                        13.90    3.30  13.90
                             9941
                          0.294210
                            25H3.72
                           1135.89
                           0. 0 0 0 ฃ 2 2
                           ~3."ง61
                        17142
                      0.294210
                        4317.35
                       1185.89
                       0.000222
                        3 .316
                                                              PHfiSE 3
                            3.30  13.90
              3.30
           9955
        O.294262
          2504.tf5
         1135.39
         0.000222
          3,547
                                  HNBLYTICRL DRTR
       HCE/HCD  (PPM)
       COEfVCODMCPPM)
       NOXE/NOXD(PPM)
       C02E.--'C02D  ('•;)
                        153.21
,-.1.
1.
0. 8 6

0 = 6 O
0,04
                      17, 98
                      10. 10
                      20. 80
                       1. 03
  8. 07
  3. 5 4
  0. 70
  0. 0 4
                                                      124.11
                                                       32.4Fi
                                                         1. 45
  8.46
  2.45
  O. 70
  0. 04
L. i
  ii
                           TEST FHRSE RESULTS
       HC  (GRRMS/TEST PHRSE>
       CO  (GRRMS/TEST PHRSE)
       NOX (GRRMS/TEST PHRSE)
       C02 (GRRMS/TEST PHRSE)
       FUEL ECONOMY  (MPG)
                                ;OLD STRPT
                                •RflNSIENT
                                •pHRSE 1)
                                   •J < •-' i O
                                  53.956
                                   4.024
                                2137.133
                                  14.093
                          COLD STRRT
                          STABILIZED
                          (PHRSE 2)

                             O. 743
                             O. 920
           HOT STRRT
           STABILIZED
           (PHRSE 3)
                            15.209
             2. 144
             9.575
             4.639
          1832.746
            16.961
 -381

-------
 [I
 ซM


•|:-i    TEST NO:

 m
      PROJECT:


T    VEHICLE:
 a
                                         158
                            EG&:G  RUTOMOTIVE RESEflRCH,  INC.


                               FEDERflL  TEST PROCEDURE


                         1973  URBRH  DYNfiMQMETER EMISSION TEST
                                                             PRGE  2  OF  2
                         06


                      '98912
                                               TEST DflTE:     6-26-79


                                               REPT DflTE:     7-03-79


                                               ODOMETER :649.0
VEHICLE MRKE:




MODEL YERR/MODEL:




VEHICLE I.D. NUMBER:



ENGINE SERIRL NUMBER:
                                     VEHICLE  DRTR


                                        FORD




                                    1979 FRIRMONT




                                     F9K92F13755 IF
       INERT Ifl WEIGHT:   3380 POUNDS
             TEST RESULTS


              0.609 GRRMS.--MILE



       CO:     4.011 GRRMS/MILE




       HOX:    1.344 GRRMS/MILE



       C02:  567.395 GRRMS/MILE
                        WEIGHTED MRSS  EMISSIONS


                                               1978  EPH  STflNDHRDS


                                              HC:    1.5  GRRMS.--MILE



                                              CO:   15.0  GRRMS/MILE




                                              HOX:   2.U  GRRMS/MILE
       URBRN  FUEL ECONOMY:   15.39 MILES-'GRLLOI
       COMMENTS:
       Q Li fl L IT Y  C 0 N T R 0 L V E RIF IC R T10 N
I-.-

-------
                  E G  &  G HUTOMOT
                                        159
                                      "flRCHj INC
                   1978  H i -5 h I.'.' o. y  F u e 1 E c o n o FI y  T e ••• t
 it
Test. Ho:
Project:
Vehicle:
                   -   06
                 799912
                      73
Test  Date"
Report  Dat
Mi lea-ge:
  6-26-79
649. 8
 "
His
M
                           TestJD.au*. s
   B i o w e r  R e '.,• o 1 u t i o n s J    1387 S
   B o. r o-ffle- 1 e r ( c o r r >  :   2 9.21
   B 1 o we r  P r e s s u r ฃ s :
   i n 1 e t ..••' o u t let           1 3 , 9 9  3 . 3 y
   M i x t tjt t* •=•  T e fi P e r o. t u re:  i y €• . @
   Hunidi t y ( Re i at i ye )  :  53 . 68 ••;
   R o 118 e '•,' o 1 u t i o n i s   2 3 6 9 2 . 8 8

                           final vt ical  Do. to.
   H y d r ce. a r b o n s < e :•• ; h a u s t ) :        2 8 .8 P P r i
   H y d roc o. r b o n s ':. b o. c k g r o u n d ) i      7 , 3 P P ivi
   U a r b ofi  M o n o x i d e  <. e ; =: h o. u s t > :     i 4 . 3 P P n
   L' o. r b ori  M o n o x i d e  ( b o. r k •? r o LJ n d ) ซ    2 , 7 P P ivi
   C o. r b Qf t  Pi o x i d e  C e x h o. u it):     2.1318 '•;
   C a r b on  H i o x i d e  (. b a c k -g r- nun d > :  8.8428 ";
h
 Tl
Is
                     Test  R e s u 1 1 s  >•. -3 r a n •= / r; i 1 e '>
    HC:     8.134
    CO:     8, 144
    C02:   486,988
    Calculated Fuel  Econo.-iy:   21.76   MPG

-------
           160
    ATTACHMENT 5



VEHICLE DRIVEABILITY

-------
""
                                              161
                                     VEHICLE DRIVEA8ILITY
                                   AUTO-MISER INTERNATIONAL
                                     AR PROJECT NO. 79091
71
Vehicle No.:
Make/Model:
                     05
Chevrolet Chevette
       Date:   June  18, 1979
Odometer:
V . I. N. :  	
Driver:
       Driveability Evaluation:   After" Baseline Test
                                           11,410.2
1B08E7Y15625
                                                          John H.  Rivenburgh
       Cold Start
       .1.  Review the manufacturer's starting procedure and follow.  Summarize pro-
           cedure:  Depress accelerator pedal to floor, release and start

       2.  Note any abnormal starting conditions:
           Smooth start at idle:
           Stalled after start:
           Number restarts required:
           Long cranking time required:
           Number of seconds:
           Throttling required to prevent stall:
           Stalled in first acceleration:
           Number of restarts required:
                                                                     Yes
                                                                     No
                                                                     No
                                                                     N/A
                                                                     Mo
                                                                     No
                                                                     None
       Hot Start
       1.  After engine reaches normal operating  temperature,  shut off  ignition and
           record any dieseling or  after  run  tendencies:   None	
        2.  Note  any  abnormal  starting  conditions:
           Smooth  start  at  idle:
           Stalled after start:
           Number  restarts  required:
           Long  cranking time required:
           Number  of seconds:
           Throttling required to  prevent stall:
           Stalled in first acceleration:
           Number  of restarts required:
                                                                     Yes
                                                                     No
                                                                     No
                                                                     N/A
                                                                     No
                                                                     No

-------

 -.1
•7T-
                                              162
        Vehicle Driveability
        Auto-Miser International
        AR Project No.  79091
        3.   Acceleration times (over road evaluation only):
            a)   Make three (3)  wide open throttle accelerations to the  following
                speeds and record times:


b)



0 to 30 MPH: 1) 5.64
0 to 50 MPH: 1) 13.55
Note any abnormalities during
Hesitation: None
Stalls: Hone
Other: None
2) 5.64 3)
2) 13.79 3}
the accelerations.
j ''%••



5.51
13.33




                                                Driver's Signature:
Date:
                                                        June 18,  1979
T'S

-------

                                              163
                                     VEHICLE DRIVEABILITY
                                   AUTO-MISER  INTERNATIONAL
                                     AR PROJECT  NO.  79091
       Vehicle No.:
       Make/Mode1:_
       Date:
              05
               Chevrolet  Chevette
               June  22, 1979
                                                     Odometer:   11530.4
                                                     V.I.N. :_
                                                     Driver:
1B08E7Y155251
John R. Rivenburgh
       Driveability Evaluation:   After Device Testing (First Series)
:'.;'
;•;,!
       Cold  Start
       1.  Review  the manufacturer's  starting  procedure and follow.   Summarize pro-
           cedure:  E>epresspedalonce to floor, release, then start.
2.
           Note any abnormal  starting  conditions;
           Smooth  start  at  idle:
           Stalled after start:
           Number  restarts  required:
           Long cranking time required :
           Number  of  seconds :
           Throttling required to prevent stall:
           Stalled in first acceleration:
           Number  of  restarts required:
                                                                 Yes
                                                                 No
                                                                 None
                                                                 No
                                                                 N/A
                                                                  No
                                                                 No
                                                                 None
        Hot  Start
        1.   After  engine  reaches normal operating temperature, shut off ignition and
            record any dieseling or after run tendencies:   Slight dieseling.   RPM
            seems  to be higher                 	
3

V-
        2.   Note any abnormal starting conditions:
            Smooth start at idle:
            Stalled after start:
            Number restarts required:
            Long cranking time required:
            Number of seconds:
            Throttling required to prevent stall:
            Stalled in first acceleration:
            Number of restarts required:
                                                                  Yes
                                                                  No
                                                                  No
                                                                  N/A
                                                                  No
                                                                  No

-------
Vehicle UriveabiliCy
Auto-Miser International
AR Project No. 79091
                                               164
U
           Acceleration times (over road evaluation only):
           a)   Make  three (3)  wide open throttle accelerations to the  following
                speeds and record times :
                                   1)    5.71     2)   5.66
0 to 30 MPH:
0 to 50 MPH:
                                   1)   13.63
                                                 2)  13.73
                                                        3)
                                                        3)
                                                                    5.50
                                                                   13.
            b)   Note any abnormalities during the accelerations.
                     Hesitation:   None	
                     Stalls:	None	
                     Other :	Mone  ._ _^.  .	...
                                                Driver's  Signature:
                                                     /!
                                                                              '
                                                       	
                                               .    ,               __    T_      ^
                                              /  Date:   June 22.  1979
                                                               :
•y,

-------
                                              165
t
. ;
m
                                      VEHICLE  DRIVEABILITY
                                    AUTO-MISER INTERNATIONAL
                                      AR PROJECT NO.  79091

       Vehicle No. :   05                              Odometer:   11770.2
       Make/Model:    Chevrolet Chevette               V.I.H.:     1B08E7Y155251
       Date:	July 5,  1979	            Driver;    John  H. Rivenburgh
       Driveability Evaluation:   ATtef'~l5ev?ce' Testing  (Second* Series)	

       Cold Start
       1.  Review  the manufacturer's  starting  procedure and follow.   Summarize pro-
           cedure:  Depress pedal once  to floor,  release and  start	

       2.  Note any abnormal  starting conditions:
           Smooth  start  at  idle:                                     •   Yes
           Stalled  after  start:                                          No
           Number restarts  required:                                     0
           Long cranking  time  required:                                  No
           Number of  seconds :                                            N/A
I';!          Throttling required  to prevent stall:                         No
            Stalled  in  first  acceleration:               .                 No	
 v          Number of restarts required:                                  0	
 S
•
-------
        Vehicle  Drive-ability
        Auto-Miser International
        AR Project No.  79091                     166
        3.  Acceleration times  (over road evaluation only):
 *t
            a)   Make three  (3)  wide open throttle accelerations  to the  following
 ri               speeds  arid record times:

 &                    0  to 30 MPH:  1)    5.90	  2)    5.92      3)     5.94

„                    0  to 50 MPH:  1)   13.95      2)  13.93      3)    13.92
            b)   Note any abnormalities  during  the accelerations.
                      Hesitation:   None
                       Stalls:       None
                      Other :        None
                                                     Driver's Signature:
                                                                 /'*- •     fl
                                                    .'  •         s
                                                     D/te:   July 5, 1979
           • :'.'   •'...'  ,'•.   '''.-.- ••'  ••••" '' •';' '  :'•':'  ' '   • •'•','.' •••' •  .'• • ';!-."-' '-.':•:'-} .
        *rj!SrtSis''••• '•'•'  ;:f?tiT^-;, -•-.•^^•••rป . •.--r-tซ,.— •

-------
                                              167
                                      VEHICLE DRIVEABILITY
                                    AUTO-MISER INTERNATIONAL
                                      AR PROJECT NO.  79091
        Vehicle  No.:
        MaXe/Moclel:_
        Date:
               Ford/Pinto
Odometer:
V.I.N.:
9T10Y146233
               June 19, 1979
Driver:   John H. Rivenburgh
        Driveability Evaluation;  —ftftar-SaTSBfine Testing
        Cold  Start
        1.  Review  the  manufacturer's starting procedure and follow.  Summarize pro-
           cedure:   Depress accelerator pedal to floor,  release and start.
        2-   Note  any  abnormal  starting conditions
            Smooth start at idle:
            Stalled after start:
            Number restarts required:
            Long  cranking time required:
            Number of seconds:
            Throttling required to prevent stall:
            Stalled in first acceleration:
            Number of restarts required:
                                                                Little rough
                                                                No
                                                                None
                                                                No
                                                                N/A
                                                                No
                                                                No
                                                                None
        Eat Start
        1.   After engine reaches normal operating temperature, shut off ignition and
            record any dieseling or after run tendencies:   None	
fTl
•3
2-   Note any abnormal starting conditionsi
    Smooth start at idle:
    Stalled after start:
    Number restarts required:
    Long cranking time required:
    Number of seconds:
    Throttling required to prevent stall:
    Stalled in first acceleration:
    Number of restarts required:
                                                                        Yes
                                                                        No
                                                                        None
                                                                        No
                  N/A
                                                                        No
                                                                        No
                                                                        None

-------
                                              168
        Vehicle Briveability
        Auto-Miser International
        AR Project No.  79091
        j.   Acceleration, times (over road evaluation only):

            a)   Make three (3) wide open throttle accelerations  to  the  following
                speeds and record times:

                     0 to 30 MPH:  1)   5.40     2)   5.43     3)   5.37
'!!                    0 to 50 MPH:  1)  11.06     2)  11.06 _  3)  11.14
3
            b)   Mote any abnormalities during the accelerations.
*fl                            -     ----- -_--— -'. :
                     Hesitation:   None
                     Stalls:       None
                     Other:         None
                                                Driver's  Signature:
                                                     :   June 19, 1979
                                                                          [7

-------
                                       169
                              VEHICLE DRIVEA5ILITY
                            AUTO-MISER INTERNATIONAL
                              AR PROJECT NO. 79091
Vehicle No.;  33	
Make/Model:   Ford/Pinto
Date:
          June 22, 1979
Odometer :  7561.8	
V.I.H.:	9T10Y146233	
Driver;     John R.  Rivenburgh
Driveability Evaluation:   After Device Tasting
Cold Start
1.  Review the manufacturer's starting procedure and follow.  Summarize  pro-
    c eel u r e:  Depre ss. pedal once to floor, release and start.	
2.
Note any abnormal starting conditions:
Smooth start at idle:
Stalled after start:
Number restarts required:
Long cranking time required:
Number of seconds:
Throttling required to prevent stall:
Stalled in first acceleration:
Number of restarts required:
                                                                  Yes
                                                                  No
                                                                  No
                                                                  N/A
                                                                  No
                                                                  No
Hot Start
1.  After engine reaches normal, operating temperature,  shut  off  ignition and
     scord any dieseling or after run  tendencies:
rec
                                                Mo n
2.  Note any abnormal starting conditions:
    Smooth start at idle:
    Stalled after start:
    Number restarts required:
    Long cranking time required:
    Number of seconds:
    Throttling required  to prevent  stall:
    Stalled in first acceleration:
    Number of restarts required:
                                                              Yes
                                                              No
                                                              None
                                                              No
                                                              N/A
                                                              No
                                                              No

-------
.-A
? .,      Vehicle Driveability
•  :j      Auto-Miser International
•  t!      AR Project No. 79091

  4

  '      3.  Acceleration times  (over  road  evaluation only):

 ~r,          a)  Make three  (3) wide open  throttle  accelerations to the following
  i              speeds and record  times:
 •d
                     0 to 30 MPH:  1)   5.06      2)    5.10     3)   5.19

 •>.'                   ฐ to 50 MPH:  1)  11-05      2)   11.05     3)   11.03
 WiH
            b)  Note any abnormalities during the  accelerations.

 'i                   Hesitation:   None
                     Stalls:       None
                     Other:        None
                                                 Driver's Signature:
                                                     :   June 22, 1979

-------
                                      VEHICLE  URIVEABILITY
                                   AUTO-MISER INTERNATIONAL
                                      AR  PROJECT  NO.  79091

       Vehicle No.:   73	Odometer:    519.8
       Make/Model:    Ford/Fairmont	            V.I.N.:      9K92F187551	
       Date:	June 18,  1979	            Driver:      John H. Rivenburgh
       Driveability Evaluation:   fffter~6a'selihe  Testing	*	
       Cold Start
       1.  Review  the  manufacture?.'' s  starting  procedure  and follow.   Summarize pro-
           cedure :
       2.  Note any  abnormal  starting  conditions:
"*!          Smooth  start  at  idle:                                       	Yes
 "*          Stalled after start:                                        	NO
-^          Number  restarts  required:                                   	p
           Long cranking  time  required:                                	No
           Number of  seconds:                                          	N/A
           Throttling required  to  prevent stall:                       	No
           Stalled  in  first  acceleration:                              	NO
           Number of restarts required:                                	p
        Hot  Start
        1.   After  engine  reaches normal  operating temperature,  shut off ignition and
            record any  dieseiing or after run tendencies:   None	
        2.   Note  any  abnormal starting conditions:
            Smooth start at idle:                                            Yes
            Stalled after start:                                        	No
            Number restarts required:                                   	0
            Long cranking time required:                                	No
            Number of seconds:                                               N/A
            Throttling required to prevent stall:                      	No
            Stalled in first acceleration:                              	No
            Number of restarts required ;                                	Hone

-------
                                              172
        Vehicle  Driveability
        Auto-Miser  International
        AR Project  No.  79091
        3.  Acceleration times (over road evaluation only):

           a)   Make  three (3)  wide open throttle accelerations to the following
                speeds and record times :

                     0 to 30  MPH:  1)     4.28     2)     4.13    3)    4.25
                     0 to 50 MPH:   1)     8.24     2)     8.16     3)    8.43
           b)   Note  any abnormali-ties-doring 'the accelerations.

                     Hesitation:    None
                     Stalls:        None
T!                    Other:         None
                                                Driver's Signature:

                                                                   /ฃ?
                                                 fate:   June  18,  1979
(SB

-------
IT!

OS
       Vehicle No.:
       Make/Model:_
       Date:
                                              173
                                     VEHICLE DRIVEABILITY
                                   AUTO-MISER INTERNATIONAL
                                     AR PROJECT NO. 79091
               73
               Ford/Fairmont
               June 22, 1979
Odometer:   594.9	
V.I.N.:     9K92F187551	
Driver:  ~   John H.  Rivenburg
Driveability Evaluation:After Device Testing
       Cold Start
       1.  Review the manufacturer's; starting procedure and follow.  Summarize pro-
           cedure :^Depress_pedal once to floor, release and start.
       2.  Note any abnormal starting conditions:
           Smooth start at idle:
           Stalled after start:
           Number restarts required:
           Long cranking time required:
           Number of seconds:
           Throttling required to prevent stall:
           Stalled in first acceleration:
           Number of restarts required:
                                                                 Little rough
                                                                 No
                                                                 No
                                                                 N/A
                                                                 No
                                                                 No
       Hot Start
       1.  After engine reaches normal operating temperature, shut off ignition and
           record any dieseling or after run tendencies:   None - OK	
2.  Note any abnormal starting conditions
    Smooth start at idle:
    Stalled after start:
    Number restarts required:
    Long cranking time required:
    Number of seconds:
    Throttling required to prevent stall:
    Stalled in first acceleration:
    Number of restarts reauired:
                                                                        Yes
                                                                        No
                                                                        No
                                                                        N/A
                                                                        No
                                                                        No

-------
                                            174
       Vehicle Driveability
 I      Auto-Miser International
^      AR Project No.  79091


?&      3.  Acceleration  tines  (over road evaluation only):

           a)   Make  three  (3) wide open throttle accelerations  to the following
'::':•              speeds  and  record times:
m
                    0  to 30 MPH:  1)	4.04      2)    4.QQ     3)   4.05

"">                   0  to 50 MPH:  1)  3.07	  2)    8.19     3)	8.33

           b)   Note  any  abnormalities ..during phe accelerations.

'"                   Hesitation:  None	
$
                    Stalls;	None	
•^s                   Other:
                                              Driver's Signature:
                                                    •^x_
/
                                              D/te:   June 22, 1979
ฃ3?

-------
                                               175
*
1
                                     VEHICLE DRIVEABILITY
                                   AUTO-MISER INTERNATIONAL
                                     AH PROJECT NO. 79091
 •3
      Vehicle No.:
      Make/Mode1:_
      Date:
                     73
                     Ford/Fairmont
                     June 26, 1979
Odometer :__ 681. 3
V.I.N.:	
Driver:     John H.  Rivenburg
       Driveability Evaluation:  'ffrTer'TOdT'tlonal Testing
                                                                9K92F187551
       Cold Start
       1.  Review the manufacturer's starting procedure and follow.  Summarize pro-
           cedure:  Depress pedal once to floor, release and start.
      2.   Note any abnormal starting conditions:
          Smooth start at idle:
          Stalled after start:
          Number restarts required:
          Long cranking time required:
          Number of seconds:
          Throttling required to prevent stall:
          Stalled in first acceleration:
          Number of restarts required:
                                                                        Little rough
                                                                        No
                                                                        No
                                                                        N/A
                                                                        No
                                                                        No
Off
      Hot Start
      1.   After engine reaches normal operating temperature, shut off ignition and
          record any dieseling or after run tendencies:    None	
       2.  Note any abnormal starting conditions
           Smooth start at idle:
           Stalled .after start:
           Number restarts required:
           Long cranking time required:
           Number of seconds:
           Throttling required to prevent stall:
           Stalled in first acceleration:
           Number of restarts required:
                                                                      Yes
                                                                      No
                                                                      No
                                                                      N/A
                                                                      No
                                                                      No

-------
                                               176
       Vehicle Uriveability
       Auto-Miser International
       AH  Project Mo. 79091
        3.  Acceleration  times  (over  road evaluation only):

;-          a)  Make three  (3)  wide open throttle accelerations to  the  following
um              speeds and  record  times:

                    0 to 30  MPH:   1)   4.25      2)   4.19     3)   4.14 __

Tj                   0 to 50  MPH:   1)   8.12      2)   8.19     3)   8.09

           bj  Note any  abnormal i Ties "cfur ing 'the accelerations.
•:w
 |                   Hesitation;    None _ _______ _
I
••a
                     Stalls:        None
                    Other:None
                                                Driver's Signature:
                                                     :   June 26, 1979

-------