EPA-AA-TETSB-93-01
TECHNICAL REPORT
HEAVY-DUTY ENGINE TESTING REPORT
NON-ROAD ENGINE CONFIGURATIONS
INJECTION TIMING EFFECTS
TEST RESULTS - 1992
by
MARK DOORLAG
Technology Evaluation and Testing Support Branch
August, 1993
NOTICE
Technical Reports do not necessarily represent final EPA decisions
or positions. They are intended to present technical analysis of
issues using data which are currently available. The purpose in
the release of such reports is to facilitate the exchange of
technical information and to inform the public of technical
developments which may form the basis for a final EPA decision,
position, or regulatory action.
Technology Evaluation and Testing Support Branch
Regulation Development and Support Division
Office of Mobile Sources
Office of Air and Radiation
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
-------
Table of Contents
Page
List of Tables 4
1 Executive Summary 6
2 Introduction 9
3 Engines 9
4 Fuel 11
5 Test Procedures 12
5.1 Steady State Performance 12
5.2 HD-FTP Transient Testing 12
5.3 Steady State (8-Mode) Testing 12
5.4 Federal On-Highway Smoke Testing 12
6 John Deere 6068T Engine, Production Injection
Timing, Production Injectors Testing/Results 13
6.1 Steady State Performance Evaluation 13
6.2 HD-FTP Transient Testing/Results 13
6.3 Steady State (8-Mode) Testing/Results 13
7 John Deere 6068T Engine, Retarded Injection
Timing, Production Injectors Testing/Results 17
7.1 Steady State Performance Evaluation 17
7.2 HD-FTP Transient Testing/Results 17
7.3 Steady State (8-Mode) Testing/Results 17
8 John Deere 6068T Engine, Retarded Injection
Timing, Modified Injectors Testing/Results 21
8.1 Steady State Performance Evaluation 21
8.2 HD-FTP Transient Testing/Results 21
8.3 Steady State (8-Mode) Testing/Results 21
9 Ford New Holland Engine, Production Injection
Timing Testing/Results 25
9.1 Steady State Performance Evaluation 25
9.2 HD-FTP Transient Testing/Results 25
9.3 Steady State (8-Mode) Testing/Results 25
-------
10 Ford New Holland Engine, Retarded Injection
Timing Testing/Results 29
10.1 Steady State Performance Evaluation 29
10.2 HD-FTP Transient Testing/Results 29
10.3 Steady State (8-Mode) Testing/Results 29
11 Analysis and Conclusions 33
-------
List of Tables
Table 1.1
Table 1.2
Table 1.3
Table 3.1
Table 4.1
Table 6.1
Table 6.2
Table 6.3
Table 6.4
Table 7.1
Table 7.2
Table 7.3
Table 7.4
Table 8.1
Page
Four Non-Road Heavy-Duty Diesel
Engine Configurations 6
Emissions Summary for John Deere
6068T Engine Configurations 7
Emissions Summary for Ford New
Holland Engine Configurations 8
Engine Specifications 10
Diesel Fuel Analysis and CFR
Specifications 11
John Deere 6068T Engine, Production
Injection Timing, Production Injectors
Steady State Performance Data 14
John Deere 6068T Engine, Production
Injection Timing, Production Injectors
HD-FTP Transient Test Results 14
John Deere 6068T Engine, Production
Injection Timing, Production Injectors
8-Mode Steady-State #1 Emission Results . 15
John Deere 6068T Engine, Production
Injection Timing, Production Injectors
8-Mode Steady-State #2 Emission Results . 16
John Deere 6068T Engine, Retarded
Injection Timing, Production Injectors
Steady State Performance Data 18
John Deere 6068T Engine, Retarded
Injection Timing, Production Injectors
HD-FTP Transient Test Results 18
John Deere 6068T Engine, Retarded
Injection Timing, Production Injectors
8-Mode Steady-State #1 Emission Results . 19
John Deere 6068T Engine, Retarded
Injection Timing, Production Injectors
8-Mode Steady-State 12 Emission Results . 20
John Deere 6068T Engine, Retarded
Injection Timing, Modified Injectors
Steady State Performance Data 22
-------
Table 8.2
Table 8.3
Table 8.4
Table 9.1
Table 9.2
Table 9.3
Table 9.4
Table 10.1
Table 10.2
Table 10.3
Table 10.4
Table 11.1
Table 11.2
John Deere 6068T Engine, Retarded
Injection Timing, Modified Injectors
HD-FTP Transient Test Results 22
John Deere 6068T Engine, Retarded
Injection Timing, Modified Injectors
8-Mode Steady-State #1 Emission Results . 23
John Deere 6068T Engine, Retarded
Injection Timing, Modified Injectors
8-Mode Steady-State #2 Emission Results . 24
Ford New Holland Engine, Production
Injection Timing Steady State
Performance Data 26
Ford New Holland Engine, Production
Injection Timing HD-FTP Transient
Test Results 26
Ford New Holland Engine, Production
Injection Timing 8-Mode Steady-State #1
Emission Results 27
Ford New Holland Engine, Production
Injection Timing 8-Mode Steady-State #2
Emission Results 28
Ford New Holland Engine, Retarded
Injection Timing Steady State
Performance Data '. 30
Ford New Holland Engine, Retarded
Injection Timing HD-FTP Transient
Test Results 30
Ford New Holland Engine, Retarded
Injection Timing 8-Mode Steady-State #1
Emission Results 31
Ford New Holland Engine, Retarded
Injection Timing 8-Mode Steady-State #2
Emission Results 32
Emissions Summary For John Deere 6068T
Engine 34
Emissions Summary For Ford New Holland
Engine 35
-------
1. Executive Summary
In 1990, the US Congress passed, and the President signed into
law, a revised Clean Air Act. One element of the 1990 Clean Air
Act is a requirement to regulate non-road engines if they are found
to be significant contributors to urban air pollution. As part of
the resultant regulatory development process, EPA initiated an
emission testing program to collect data on the class of engines
for which the regulations were being developed. The program also
investigated likely control strategies that would be employed as a
result of the regulations under consideration and the impact of
these strategies on emissions. Of particular interest was the
ability of injection timing retardation to lower NOX emission
levels and, in turn, its effect on the other regulated emissions
levels. Secondarily, the program studied the relationship between
On-Highway HD-FTP and 8-mode steady-state emission data on current
and potential future non-road engines.
This report contains emission test results from the following
five non-road heavy-duty diesel engine configurations:
Table 1.1
Five Non-Road Heavy-Duty Diesel Engine Configurations
1
2
3
4
5
Characteristic
Manuf act .
John Deere
John Deere
John Deere
Ford New
Holland
Ford New
Holland
Application
Log-Skidder
Log-Skidder
Log-Skidder
Ag. Tractor
Ag . Tractor
Model
Year
1990
1990
1990
1991
1991
HP
140
140
140
130
130
Injectors
Product . l
Product . *
Modified
Product . 1
Product . l
Injection
Timing
Product . 1
Retarded
Retarded
Product . *
Retarded
1Product. - Production configuration
Emission testing included operation over the EPA Heavy-Duty
On-Highway Federal Test Procedure (HD-FTP) and 8-mode steady-state
duty cycles. Each engine configuration was tested for emissions of
HC, CO, NO,, and Particulate Matter (PM) . A summary of the average
test results is given below in Tables 1.2 and 1.3.
-------
Table 1.2
Emissions Summary for John Deere 6068T Engine Configurations
John Deere 6068T Non-Road Engine
Production Injection Timing, Production Iniectors
HD-FTP, Transient
8-Mode, Steady-State
HC
CO
NOX
PM
g/bhp-hr
(g/kW-hr)
0.858
(1.151)
0.427
(0.573)
3.606
(4.836)
3.144
(4.216)
10.808
(14.494)
11.758
(15.767)
0.405
(0.543)
0.422
(0.566)
John Deere 6068T Non-Road Engine
Retarded Injection Timing, Production Injectors
HD-FTP, Transient
8-Mode, Steady-State
HC
CO
NOX
PM
g/bhp-hr
(g/kW-hr)
1.580
(2.119)
0.933
(1.251)
5.433
(7.286)
4.770
(6.397)
5.650
(7.577)
6.340
(8.502)
0.992
(1.330)
1.089
(1.460)
John Deere 6068T Non-Road Engine
Retarded Injection Timing, Modified Iniectora
HD-FTP, Transient
8-Mode, Steady-State
HC
CO
NO,
PM
g/bhp-hr
(g/kW-hr)
0.839
(1.125)
0.774
(1.038)
4.262
(5.715)
3.564
(4.779)
6.038
(8.097)
7.327
(9.826)
0.810
(1.086)
0.866
(1.161)
-------
8
Table 1.3
Emissions Summary for Ford New Holland Engine Configurations
Ford New Holland Non-Road Engine, Production In-jection Timing
HD-FTP, Transient
8-Mode, Steady-State
HC
CO
NOX
PM
g/bhp-hr
(g/kw-hr)
2.116
(2.838)
0.703
(0.943)
5.288
(7.091)
5.575
(7.476)
10.590
(14.201)
9.272
(12.434)
0.902
(1.210)
0.963
(1.291)
Ford New Holland Non-Road Engine, Retarded Infection Timing
HD-FTP, Transient
8-Mode, Steady-State
HC
CO
NOX
PM
g/bhp-hr
(g/kW-hr)
3.639
(4.880)
1.397
(1.873)
5.9021
(7.915)1
4.767
(6.393)
7.055
(9.461)
5.895
(7.905)
1.262
(1.692)
1.310
(1.757)
lThis value incorporates data which was measured via continuous integration rather
than a bag sample, which was the method used for all the other HD-FTP CO values
reported. The author feels that this factor has an insignificant impact on the
results.
For the John Deere and Ford New Holland engine, injection
timing retardation significantly reduced the NOX emission levels
while increasing the other pollutant (HC, CO, and PM) emission
levels over both the 8-mode steady-state (with the exception of CO
for the Ford New Holland engine) and the HD-FTP test.
Finally, in comparison to the John Deere engine, retarded
configuration utilizing production injectors, the "modified"
injector configuration caused reductions in HC, CO, and PM emission
levels, over both the 8-mode steady-state and HD-FTP test, while
NOX slightly increased. These "modified" injectors in the John
Deere engine were designed to provide better targeting of the fuel
spray plume at retarded injection timings.
-------
2. Introduction
In 1990, the US Congress passed, and the President signed into
law, a revised Clean Air Act. One element of the 1990 Clean Air
Act is a requirement to regulate non-road engines if they are found
to be significant contributors to urban air pollution. As part of
the resultant regulatory development process, EPA initiated an
emission testing program to collect data on the class of engines
for which the regulations were being developed. The program also
investigated likely control strategies that would be employed as a
result of the regulations under consideration and the impact of
these strategies on emissions. Of particular interest was the
ability of injection timing retardation to lower NOX emission
levels and, in turn, its effect on the other regulated emissions
levels. Secondarily, the program studied the relationship between
On-Highway HD-FTP and 8-mode steady-state emission data on current
and potential future non-road engines.
Test results for five engine configurations (three John Deere
engine configurations and two Ford New Holland engine
configurations) are presented in this report. The John Deere
engine configurations consisted of a production non-road engine,
the same engine with retarded injection timing, and the same engine
with modified fuel injectors (while maintaining the aforementioned
retarded injection timing). The Ford New Holland engine
configurations consisted of a production non-road engine and the
same engine with retarded injection timing.
3. Engines
Table 3.1 summarizes the specifications for the two engines
(five engine configurations) which were used in this program. The
1990 model year John Deere 6068T was a turbocharged, in-line 6-
cylinder, 6.8 L displacement heavy-duty diesel engine. Rated and
peak torque speed for this direct injection engine were 2200 and
1300 RPM, respectively, with a rated horsepower of 139 hp (103.7
kW) .
The 1991 model year Ford New Holland heavy-duty diesel engine
was an in-line 6-cylinder, 7.5 L displacement, with no
turbocharging. Rated speed and peak torque speeds for this direct
injection engine were 2100 and 1200 RPM respectively, with a rated
horsepower of 127 hp (94.7 kW).
-------
10
Table 3.1
Engine Specifications
Manufacturer
Model
Use
Engine Serial Number
Model Year
Rated Power (bhp)
Rated Speed (rpm)
Peak Torque (ft-lb)
Peak Torque Speed (rpm)
Injection Timing (°BTDC)
Injectors
Cylinders
Cylinder Configuration
Bore x Stroke (in)
Displacement (in3 - liter)
Aspiration
Aftercooling
John Deere
6068T
Log-Skidder
JDPRODT6068T35JL
1990
139
2200
467
1300
151 ~ 72
Product . 3 Product . 3 Modified
6
in-line
4.19 x 5.0
414 - 6.8
turbo
none
Ford New
Holland
Ag. Tractor
358/117-91-89V
1991
127
2100
383
1200
81 - 42
Product .3
6
in-line
4.4 x 5.0
456 - 7.5
natural
none
Production injection timing.
2Retarded injection timing.
3Preduction.
The modified injectors used with the John Deere 6068T engine
were actually experimental injectors provided by John Deere. They
were designed to provide better targeting of the fuel spray plume
at retarded injection timings.
-------
11
4. Fuel
The D-2 diesel fuel used for all testing was purchased from
Phillips 66 Company. The characteristics of this fuel were
provided by Phillips 66 Company in their product information
report, a copy of which is included in Appendix A. Pertinent fuel
properties are given in Table 4.1.
Table 4.1
Diesel Fuel Analysis and CFR Specifications
Item
Cetane Number
Distillation Range:
IBP °F
10% Point, °F
50% Point, °F
90% Point, °F
EP, °F
Gravity, API
Total Sulfur, %
Hydrocarbon
Composition :
Aromatics, %
Paraffins, Naphthenes,
Olefins
Flashpoint, °F (min.)
Viscosity, Centistokes
CFR Specifications"
ASTM TEST
D613
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D287
D129 or D2622
D1319
D1319
D93
D445
Type D-2
42-50
340-400
400-460
470-540
550-610
580-660
33-37
0.20-0.50
27b
c
130
2.0-3.2
Phillips
Petroleum
Analysis
46.0
364
441
509
580
622
34.8
0.26
36.4
63.6
180
2.6
•Diesel fuel specification as in CFR 86 . 1313-90 (b) (2) for 1990
on-road heavy-duty diesel engines .
''Minimum
Remainder
The fuel was introduced to the engine by transferring it from
the barrel in which it was shipped to the normal laboratory fuel
delivery system by an auxiliary lift pump. It was presented to the
engine at a pressure of 0 to 0.5 psi and a temperature less than
100° F.
-------
12
5. Test. Procedures
5.1 Steady State Performance
Each of the engines were set up in the EPA National Vehicle
and Fuel Emissions Laboratory (NVFEL) test cell #1 and run at
measured rated speed and peak torque speed, with the rack lever
wide open at both speeds. At both of these conditions, the speed,
torque, and fuel flow were measured after stabilization occurred.
Each condition was considered stable when the engine oil
temperature stayed within ± 2° F of the stabilized value for two
minutes. These speed, torque, and fuel flow values were compared
to the manufacturers' data to ensure that the engine was set-up and
running correctly.
5.2 HP-FTP Transient Testing
Following a torque map of the engine, two EPA on-highway HD-
FTP transient test sequences per engine were performed. A test
sequence consisted of one cold-start transient test plus two
consecutive hot-start transient tests (sequence = 1 cold-start 4- 2
hot-start) . All gaseous (HC, CO, and NOJ and particulate matter
(PM) emissions were collected for each HD-FTP test. The cold-
start and first hot-start were used in determining the composite
result. The HD-FTP transient emissions tests were performed
following procedures given in CFR 40 Part 86 Subpart N for on-
highway heavy-duty diesel emissions measurement.
5.3 Steady State (8-Mode) Testing
Two 8-mode steady state emission tests were performed on each
of the three John Deere 6068T engine configurations and on each of
the two Ford New Holland engine configurations. The ISO 8178 8-
mode test procedure (which is very similar to the proposed non-road
test procedure found in CFR 40 Part 89 - Control of Emission from
New and In-Use Nonroad Engines for New Nonroad Compression-Ignition
Engines at or above 50 Horsepower, Subpart D and E - Emission Test
Equipment Equipment Provisions and Procedures) was used along with
particulate matter procedures described in Appendix B. Gaseous
emissions (HC, CO, and NOX) and particulate matter (PM) were
measured for each individual mode, then a composite brake-specific
emission rate was computed using assigned weighting factors. All
emissions measurements used dilute full-flow CVS sampling
techniques and one particulate filter for each mode.
5.4 Federal On-Highwav Smoke Testing
A modified version of the Federal on-highway smoke test was
performed on each of the three John Deere 6068T engine
configurations and on each of the two Ford New Holland engine
configurations. These tests were not intended to yield Federal
Smoke Test Procedure results, but rather were performed in order to
observe the directional change in smoke levels due to injection
timing. The results are summarized in a memorandum in Appendix C.
-------
13
6. John Deere 6068T Engine, Production Injection Timing,
Production Injectors Testing/Results
6.1 Steady State Performance Evaluation
The engine was mounted on the test stand and its flywheel
connected to the dynamometer through a drive shaft torquemeter.
The exhaust outlet was connected to the part of the system which
transfers the exhaust to the dilution tunnel.
With the installation complete, the engine was run at steady
state conditions while speeds, torques, and fuel flows were
recorded. These values were compared to the engine manufacturer's
values (see Table 6.1) and were found to be similar.
6.2 HP-FTP Transient Testing/Results
After the engine was torque mapped, two HD-FTP transient test
sequences were run. Each sequence consisted of one cold and two
hot starts, with the composite results computed from the cold-start
and first hot-start. The HD-FTP test results are presented in
Table 6.2. The NOX level of 10.808 g/bhp-hr measured for this
engine configuration is higher than the on-highway pre-control
standard level of 10.7 g/bhp-hr. However, the measured PM level of
0.405 g/bhp-hr is lower than the on-highway first level of control
of 0.6 g/bhp-hr. This is probably due to an advanced engine timing
schedule.
6.3 Steady State (8-Mode) Testing/Results
The steady-state test was performed twice on this engine
configuration. Average composite HC, CO, NOX, and PM levels were
determined to be 0.427, 3.144, 11.758, and 0.422 g/bhp-hr
respectively. Both NO, and PM results were higher on the 8-mode
steady-state test than on the HD-FTP transient test.
The detailed 8-mode steady-state test results are presented in
Tables 6.3 and 6.4. These tables are broken down into four groups,
with the first grouping of data identifying the actual test modes,
and modal weighting factor used in computing the modal-weighted
composite brake specific emissions at the bottom of each table.
The other groupings of data include the mass emission rate in
grams/hour for each mode, the fuel specific emission result at each
mode in grams/pound of fuel consumed, and finally the brake
specific emission rate at each mode is given in grams/horsepower-
hour.
-------
14
Table 6.1
John Deere 6068T Engine, Production Injection Timing,
Production Injectors Steady State Performance Data
LAB
JOHN DEERE VALUES
EPA VALUES
TORQUE, FT-LB
1300 RPM
467.0
479.0
2200 RPM
332.0
334.0
FUEL FLOW, GAL/HR
1300 RPM
5.7
5.7
2200 RPM
7.2
7.2
Table 6.2
John Deere 6068T Engine, Production Injection Timing,
Production Injectors HD-FTP Transient Test Results
HC
(g/bhp-hr)
CO
(g/bhp-hr)
NO,
(g/bhp-hr)
PM
(g/bhp-hr)
First Sequence
Cold Start
Hot Start fl
Hot Start #2
Composite1
1.031
0,878
0.878
0.900
4.189
3.803
3.598
3.858
10.859
10.588
10.729
10.627
0.426
0.408
0.389
0.411
Second Sequence
Cold Start
Hot Start #1
Hot Start #2
Composite1
1.040
0.778
0.747
0.816
3.723
3.291
3.400
3.353
10.962
10.994
10.789
10.989
0.520
0^378
0.386
0.398
Average2 | 0.858 | 3.606 | 10.808
0.405
Composite - 1/7(Cold Start) + 6/7(Hot Start #1)
2Average of the 2 composite values.
-------
15
T*bl* 6.3
John D**r* 6068T Cngin*, Production Injection Timing, Production Injector*
8-Mod* St**dy-St*t* fl Zmi**ion R**ult*
8-Mode Teat Points
Mode
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Speed
Int
Int
Int
Rated
Rated
Rated
Rated
Idle
Load %
50
75
100
100
75
50
10
0
Weighting
Factor
10%
10%
10%
15%
15%
15%
10%
15%
Speed
rpm
1300
1300
1300
2200
2200
2200
2200
960
Torque
ft-lb
244.5
360.5
482.0
338.0
253.0
169.2
37.0
4.0
BHP
60.5
89.2
119.3
141.6
106.0
70.9
15.5
0.7
Mode g/hr results
Mode
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
HP
60.5
89.2
119.3
141.6
106.0
70.9
15.5
0.7
Fuel
Ib/hr
20.97
29.34
39.86
50.30
39.82
27.23
12.56
2.09
HC
g/hr
25.27
27.67
21.19
35.54
28.46
42.94
66.43
25.98
CO
g/hr
25.72
37.16
235.79
663.68
334.40
180.05
112.90
59.83
NO,
g/hr
847.98
1311.29
1641.40
1667.27
1027.90
558.95
167.47
68.43
PM
g/hr
6.39
12.02
23.29
61.21
60.74
46.46
12.13
3.86
Mod* g/lb fuel
Mode
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
HP
60.5
89.2
119.3
141.6
106.0
70.9
15.5
0.7
Fuel
Ib/lb
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
HC
g/lb
1.20
0.94
0.53
0.71
0.71
1.58
5.29
12.43
CO
g/lb
1.23
1.27
5.92
13.19
8.40
6.61
8.99
28.62
NO,
g/lb
40.44
44.69
41.18
33.15
25.81
20.53
13.33
32.74
PM
g/lb
0.30
0.41
0.58
1.22
1.53
1.71
0.97
1.84
Mod* g/bhp-hr
Mode
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
HP
60.5
89.2
119.3
141.6
106.0
70.9
15.5
0.7
BSFC
Ib/hp-hr
0.346
0.329
0.334
0.355
0.376
0.384
0.810
NA
HC
g/bhp-hr
0.42
0.31
0.18
0.25
0.27
0.61
4.29
NA
CO
g/bhp-hr
0.42
0.42
1.98
4.69
3.16
2.54
7.28
NA
NO.
g/bhp-hr
14.01
14.70
13.76
11.78
9.70
7.89
10.81
NA
PM
g/bhp-hr
0.11
0.13
0.20
0.43
0.57
0.66
0.78
NA
8 -Mode
Weighted
BSFC
Ib/hp-hr
0.346
HC
g/bhp-hr
0.445
CO
g/bhp-hr
2.972
NO.
g/bhp— hr
11.728
PM
g/bhp-hr
0.409
-------
16
Tabl* 6.4
John 0««r« 6068T Engine, Produation Injection Timing, Production Injector*
8-Mode Steady-State §2 Emission Result*
Mode
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Speed
Int
Int
Int
Rated
Rated
Rated
Rated
Idle
8-Mode Test Points
Load %
50
75
100
100
75
50
10
0
Weighting
Factor
10%
10%
10%
15%
15%
15%
10%
15%
Speed
rpm
1300
1300
1300
2200
2200
2200
2200
960
Torque
ft-lb
241.0
358.2
483.2
335.0
252.1
169.0
36.4
4.0
BMP
59.7
88.7
119.6
140.3
105.6
70.8
15.2
0.7
Mode g/hr results
Mode
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
HP
59.7
88.7
119.6
140.3
105.6
70.8
15.2
0.7
Fuel
Ib/hr
18.96
29.42
41.95
50.37
41.93
27.25
12.57
2.09
HC
g/hr
22.20
27.69
17.90
30.73
24.63
41.08
60.66
24.55
CO
g/hr
23.16
40.91
301.77
678.98
398.36
231.96
101.58
57.87
NO,
g/hr
890.44
1361.71
1678.65
1647.62
971.83
548.46
170.17
65.21
PM
g/hr
6.23
12.66
25.13
63.11
57.11
57.82
12.38
4.04
Mode g/lb fuel
Mode
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
HP
59.7
88.7
119.6
140.3
105.6
70.8
15.2
0.7
Fuel
Ib/lb
NA
NA
MA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
HC
g/lb
1.17
0.94
0.43
0.61
0.59
1.51
4.83
11.75
CO
g/lb
1.22
1.39
7.19
13.48
9.50
8.51
8.08
27.69
NO.
g/lb
46.96
46.29
40.02
32.71
23.18
20.13
13.54
31.20
PM
g/lb
0.33
0.43
0.60
1.25
1.36
2.12
0.98
1.93
Mod* g/bhp-hr
Mode
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
HP
59.7
88.7
119.6
140.3
105.6
70.8
15.2
0.7
BSFC
Ib/hp-hr
0.318
0.332
0.351
0.359
0.397
0.385
0.824
NA
HC
g/bhp-hr
0.37
0.31
0.15
0.22
0.23
0.58
3.98
NA
CO
g/bhp-hr
0.39
0.46
2.52
4.84
3.77
3.28
6.66
NA
NO,
g/bhp-hr
14.93
15.36
14.04
11.74
9.20
7.75
11.16
NA
PM
g/bhp-hr
0.10
0.14
0.21
0.45
0.54
0.82
0.81
NA
8 -Mode
Weighted
BSFC
Ib/hp-hr
0.351
HC
g/bhp— hr
0.408
CO
g/bhp-hr
3.316
NO,
g/bhp— hr
11.787
PM
g/bhp— hr
0.434
-------
17
7. John Deere 6068T Engine, Retarded Injection Timing,
Production Injectors Testing/Results
7.1 Steady State Performance Evaluation
While the engine remained installed in the test cell, the
injection timing was retarded to approximately 7° BTDC from 15°
BTDC. The engine was then run at steady state conditions while
speeds, torques, and fuel flows were recorded. These values were
compared to the engine manufacturer's production engine, production
injection timing data (see Table 7.1) and notable differences in
the torque measurements were discovered. These differences could
be adequately explained by the retarded injection timing and thus
EPA concluded that the engine was operating properly.
7.2 HP-FTP Transient Testing/Results
After the engine was torque mapped, two HD-FTP transient test
sequences were run. Average composite HC, CO, NOX, and PM levels
were determined to be 1.580, 5.433, 5.650, and 0.992 g/bhp-hr
respectively. NO, was reduced by 47.7% while HC, CO, and PM
increased due to the injection timing retardation. The HD-FTP test
results for the retarded John Deere engine configuration are
presented in Table 7.2.
7.3 Steady State (8-Mode) Testing/Results
The steady-state test was performed twice on this engine
configuration. Average composite HC, CO, NOX, and PM levels were
determined to be 0.933, 4.770, 6.340, and 1.089 g/bhp-hr
respectively. Due to injection timing retardation, the HD-FTP
transient test showed NOT and PM changes of -47.7% and 144.9%
respectively, while the steady-state test showed very similar
changes of -46.1% and 158.1% for NOX and PM. The detailed 8-mode
steady-state test results are presented in Tables 7.3 and 7.4.
-------
18
Table 7.1
John Deere 6068T Engine, Retarded Injection Timing,
Production Injectors Steady State Performance Data
LAB
JOHN DEERE VALUES1
EPA VALUES
TORQUE, FT-LB
1300 RPM
467.0
476.0
2200 RPM
332.0
320.0
FUEL FLOW, GAL/HR
1300 RPM
5.7
5.7
2200 RPM
7.2
7.2
1Engine manufacturer's production engine, production injection timing data.
Table 7.2
John Deere 6068T Engine, Retarded Injection Timing,
Production Injectors HD-FTP Transient Test Results
HC
(g/bhp-hr)
CO
(g/bhp-hr)
NO,
(g/bhp-hr)
PM
(g/bhp-hr)
First Sequence
Cold Start
Hot Start #1
Hot Start #2
Composite1
2.204
1.616
1.436
1.701
6.104
5.444
4.905
5.539
5.694
5.634
5.506
5.643
1.135
1.003
0.928
1.022
Second Sequence
Cold Start
Hot Start #1
Hot Start #2
Composite1
1.871
1.390
1.357
1.459
6.170
5.186
4.930
5.326
5.926
5.611
5.648
5.656
1.048
0.948
0.937
0.962
Average2 | 1.580 || 5.433 | 5.650 | 0.992
Composite - 1/7(Cold Start) + 6/7(Hot Start #1)
2Average of the 2 composite values.
-------
19
Table 7.3
John Deere 6068T Engine, Retarded Injection Timing, Production Injector*
8-Mode Steady-State fl Emission Results
8-Mode Test Points
Mode
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Speed
Rated
Rated
Rated
Rated
Int
Int
Int
Idle
Load %
100
75
50
10
100
75
50
0
Weighting
Factor
15%
15%
15%
10%
10%
10%
10%
15%
Speed
rpm
2200
2200
2200
2200
1300
1300
1300
960
Torque
ft-lb
320.0
241.0
161.5
37.0
476.0
356.0
260.0
5.0
BHF
134 .0
101.0
67.7
15.5
117.8
88.1
64.4
0.9
Mode g/hr results
Mode
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
HP
134.0
101.0
67.7
15.5
117.8
88.1
64.4
0.9
Fuel1
Ib/hr
50.78
42.26
29.54
16.88
42.20
33.76
21.10
2.76
HC
g/hr
29.26
27.71
43.40
436.66
18.20
26.14
20.78
25.58
CO
g/hr
682.85
579.61
255.64
521.87
289.99
60.98
431.65
65.84
NO.
g/hr
799.56
502.81
300.36
97.58
971.62
610.25
442.84
36.26
PM
g/hr
145.85
132.06
70.13
92.34
97.99
35.36
92.89
4.02
'Fuel consumption is measured, only idle mode is calculated trom exnauat emissions.
Mode g/lb fuel
Mode
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
HP
134.0
101.0
67.7
15.5
117.8
88.1
64.4
0.9
Fuel
Ib/lb
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
HC
g/lb
0.58
0.66
1.47
25.87
0.43
0.77
0.99
9.27
CO
g/lb
13.45
13.72
8.65
30.92
6.87
1.81
20.46
23.86
NO,
g/lb
15.75
11.90
10.17
5.78
23.02
18.08
20.99
13.14
PM
g/lb
2.87
3.12
2.37
5.47
2.32
1.05
4.40
1.46
Mode g/bhp— hr
Mode
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
HP
134.0
101.0
67.7
15.5
117.8
88.1
64.4
0.9
BSFC
Ib/hp-hr
0.379
0.419
0.437
1.089
0.358
0.383
0.328
NA
HC
g/bhp-hr
0.218
0.274
0.642
28.173
0.155
0.297
0.323
NA
CO
g/bhp-hr
5.094
5.741
3.779
33.671
2.461
0.692
6.707
NA
NO,
g/bhp-hr
5.965
4.981
4.440
6.296
8.246
6.925
6.881
NA
PM
g/bhp— hr
1.088
1.308
1.037
5.958
0.832
0.401
1.443
NA
8 -Mode
Weighted
BSFC
Ib/hp-hr
0.356
HC
g/bhp— hr
0.932
CO
g/bhp-hr
4.966
NO.
g/bhp-hr
6.181
PM
g/bhp-hr
1.142
-------
20
T«bl« 7.4
John D««r« 6068T Cngin*, Retarded Injection Timing, Production Injector*
8-Mod* Steady-State 12 Kmi««ion Result*
8 -Mods Teat Points
Mode
1
2
• 3
4
5
6
7
8
Speed
Rated
Rated
Rated
Rated
Int
Int
Int
Idle
Load %
100
75
50
10
100
75
50
0
Weighting
Factor
15%
15%
15%
10%
10%
10%
10%
15%
Speed
rpm
2200
2200
2200
2200
1300
1300
1300
960
Torque
ft-lb
320.5
244.0
163.5
32.0
475.0
352.0
243.5
0.0
BHP
134.3
102.2
68.5
13.4
117.6
87.1
60.3
0.0
Mode g/hr results
Mode
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
HP
134.3
102.2
68.5
13.4
117.6
87.1
60.3
0.0
Fuel1
Ib/hr
50.67
42.22
29.54
14.76
42.17
29.54
18.99
2.56
HC
g/hr
30.80
26.93
42.83
438.38
17.84
24.07
20.90
23.36
CO
g/hr
805.31
564.26
258.60
502.25
274.79
49.64
29.72
44.30
NO,
g/hr
863.44
544.52
325.12
87.43
1010.78
634.49
395.20
35.86
PM
g/hr
154.52
132.82
71.53
80.56
94.22
33.84
10.09
3.64
FueJT consumption is measured, only idle mode is calculated rrom exnauat emissions.
Mode g/lb fuel
Mode
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
HP
134.3
102.2
68.5
13.4
117.6
87.1
60.3
0.0
Fuel
Ib/lb
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
HC
g/lb
0.61
0.64
1.45
29.70
0.42
0.81
1.10
9.13
CO
g/lb
15.89
13.36
8.75
34.03
6.52
1.68
1.56
17.30
NO,
g/lb
17.04
12.90
11.01
5.92
23.97
21.48
20.81
14.01
PM
g/lb
3.05
3.15
2.42
5.46
2.23
1.15
0.53
1.42
Mode g/bhp-hr
Mode
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
HP
134.3
102.2
68.5
13.4
117.6
87.1
60.3
0.0
BSFC
Ib/hp-hr
0.377
0.413
0.431
1.101
0.359
0.339
0.315
NA
HC
g/bhp— hr
0.229
0.263
0.625
32.704
0.152
0.276
0.347
NA
CO
g/bhp-hr
5.998
5.521
3.776
37.469
2.337
0.570
0.493
NA
NO,
g/bhp-hr
6.431
5.328
4.747
6.523
8.597
7.282
6.557
NA
PM
g/bhp-hr
1.151
1.299
1.044
6.010
0.801
0.388
0.167
NA
8 -Mode
Weighted
BSFC
Ib/hp-hr
0.370
HC
g/bhp— hr
0.934
CO
g/bhp-hr
4.573
NO,
g/bhp-hr
6.498
PM
g/bhp-hr
1.036
-------
21
8. John Deere 6068T Engine, Retarded Injection Timing,
Modified Injectors Testing/Results
8.1 Steady State Performance Evaluation
While the engine injection timing remained in the retarded
condition of approximately 7° BTDC, the production injectors were
replaced with "modified" injectors. These "modified" injectors
were designed to provide better combustion chamber targeting of the
fuel spray plume at retarded injection timings. The engine was
then run at steady state conditions while speeds, torques, and fuel
flows were recorded. These values were compared to the engine
manufacturer's production engine, production injection timing data
(see Table 8.1) and a notable difference in the torque measurement
at 1300 rpm was discovered. This difference could be attributed to
the combination of the retarded injection timing and "modified"
injectors and thus the difference was not investigated in this
program.
8.2 HP-FTP Transient Testing/Results
After the engine was torque mapped, two HD-FTP transient test
sequences were run. Average composite HC, CO, NOX, and PM levels
were determined to be 0.839, 4.262, 6.038, and 0.810 g/bhp-hr
respectively. NOX slightly increased while HC, CO, and PM were
reduced in comparison to the retarded configuration using
production injectors. The HD-FTP test results for the John Deere
engine retarded timing configuration equipped with "modified"
injectors are presented in Table 8.2.
8.3 Steady State (8-Mode) Testing/Results
The steady-state test was performed twice on this engine
configuration. Average composite HC, CO, NOX, and PM levels were
determined to be 0.774, 3.564, 7.327, and 0.866 g/bhp-hr
respectively. In comparison to the retarded engine configuration
using production injectors, the "modified" injectors showed NOX and
PM changes of 15.6% and -20.5% respectively, over the steady-state
test. Similarly, the HD-FTP transient test showed changes of 6.9%
and -18.3% for NOX and PM, respectively. The detailed 8-mode
steady-state test results are pre.sented in Tables 8.3 and 8.4.
-------
22
Table 8.1
John Deere 6068T Engine, Retarded Injection Timing,
Modified Injectors Steady State Performance Data
LAB
JOHN DEERE VALUES1
EPA VALUES
TORQUE, FT-LB
1300 RPM
467.0
485.0
2200 RPM
332.0
331.5
FUEL FLOW, GAL/HR
1300 RPM
5.7
5.7
2200 RPM
7.2
7.2
Engine manufacturer's production engine, production injection timing data.
Table 8.2
John Deere 6068T Engine, Retarded Injection Timing,
Modified Injectors HD-FTP Transient Test Results
HC
(g/bhp-hr)
CO
(g/bhp-hr)
NOX
(g/bhp-hr)
PM
(g/bhp-hr)
First Sequence
Cold Start
Hot Start #1
Hot Start #2
Composite1
1.135
0.791
0.716
0.840
5.085
4.116
3.961
4.255
5.907
5.907
5.931
5.907
0.895
0.794
0.754
0.808
Second Sequence
Cold Start
Hot Start #1
Hot Start #2
Composite1
1.261
0.765
0.822
0.837
5.324
4.089
4.215
4.268
6.446
6.121
6.185
6.168
0.937
0.790
0.758
0.811
Average2
0.839
4.262
6.038 1 0.810
Composite => 1/7 (Cold Start) + 6/7 (Hot Start #1)
Average of the 2 composite values.
-------
23
Table 8.3
John Deer* 6068T Engine, Retarded Inj«ation Timing, Modified Injector*
8-Mod* Steady-State f1 Emission Result*
8-Mode Test Points
Mode
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
S
Speed
Rated
Rated
Rated
Rated
Int
Int
Int
Idle
Load %
100
75
50
10
100
75
50
0
Weighting
Factor
15%
15%
15%
10%
10%
10%
10%
15%
Speed
rpm
2200
2200
2200
2200
1300
1300
1300
960
Torque
ft-lb
331.5
250.2
165.5
37.0
485.0
364.0
245.0
3.0
BHP
138.9
104 .8
69.3
15.5
120 .0
90. 1
60.6
0.5
Mode g/hr results
Mode
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
HP
138.9
104 .8
69.3
15.5
120.0
90.1
60.6
0.5
Fuel1
Ib/hr
50.62
40.06
27.39
12.64
40.02
29.52
18.97
2.25
HC
g/hr
14.33
12.84
22.37
490.19
9.06
13.61
4 .03
21.62
CO
g/hr
535.64
364.06
176.21
516.66
351.76
51.75
6.84
48.41
NO,
g/hr
990.42
618.52
356.90
99.36
1114.93
767.56
464.72
27.99
PM
g/hr
138.54
116.96
62.33
88.57
67.88
21.67
1.74
3.31
'•Fuel consumption 13 measured, only idle mode is calculated from exhaust emissions.
Mods g/lb fuel
Mode
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
HP
138.9
104.8
69.3
15.5
120.0
90.1
60.6
0.5
Fuel
Ib/lb
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
HC
g/lb
0.28
0.32
0.82
38.78
0.23
0.46
0.21
9.61
CO
g/lb
10.58
9.09
6.43
40.88
8.79
1.75
0.36
21.51
NO,
g/lb
19.57
15.44
13.03
7.86
27.86
26.00
24.50
12.44
PM
g/lb
2.74
2.92
2.28
7.01
1.70
0.73
0.09
1.47
Mod* g/bhp-hr
Mode
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
HP
138.9
104.8
69.3
15.5
120.0
90.1
60.6
0.5
BSFC
Ib/hp-hr
0.365
0.382
0.395
0.816
0.333
0.328
0.313
NA
HC
g/bhp-hr
0.103
0.123
0.323
31.627
0.075
0.151
0.066
NA
CO
g/bhp-hr
3.857
3.474
2.542
33.335
2.930
0.574
0.113
NA
NOX
g/bhp-hr
7.132
5.902
5.148
6.411
9.287
8.519
7.663
NA
PM
g/bhp-hr
0.998
1.116
0.899
5.715
0.565
0.240
6.029
NA
8 -Mode
Weighted
BSFC
Ib/hp-hr
0.303
HC
g/bhp-hr
0.824
CO
g/bhp-hr
3.454
NO,
g/bhp-hr
7.186
PM
g/bhp-hr
0.874
-------
24
Table 8.4
John Deere 6068T Sngine, Retarded Injection Timing, Modified Injector*
8-Mod* Steady-State §2 Emission Re«ult«
8-Mode Test Points
Mode
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Speed
Rated
Rated
Rated
Rated
Int
Int
Int
Idle
Load %
100
75
50
10
100
75
50
0
Weighting
Factor
15%
15%
15%
10%
10%
10%
10%
15%
Speed
rpm
2200
2200
2200
2200
1300
1300
1300
960
Torque
ft-lb
331.5
251.0
166.0
34.0
485.0
365.1
242.0
3.0
BHP
138 .9
105.1
69.5
14.2
120.0
90.4
59.9
0.5
Mode g/hr results
Mode
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
HP
138.9
105.1
69.5
14.2
120.0
90.4
59.9
0.5
Fuel1
Ib/hr
50.90
40.24
29.61
14.78
40.09
29.56
19.00
2.41
HC
g/hr
15.72
13.90
23.56
402.19
11.27
13.25
13.40
18.08
CO
g/hr
642.32
410.23
186.12
450.68
321.13
54.33
27.11
43.49
NO,
g/hr
1045.04
634 .90
374.03
100.08
1157.64
763.54
472.92
45.52
PM
g/hr
138.23
117.78
63.85
69.35
65.86
20.85
6.58
3 .39
Fuel consumption Is measured, only idle modeis calculated trom exnaust emissions.
Mode g/lb fuel
Mode
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
HP
134.3
102.2
68.5
13.4
117.6
87.1
60.3
0.0
Fuel
Ib/lb
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
HC
g/lb
0.31
0.35
0.80
27.21
0.28
0.45
0.71
7.50
CO
g/lb
12.62
10.19
6.29
30.49
8.01
1.84
1.43
18.05
NO.
g/lb
20.53
15.78
12.63
6.77
28.88
25.83
24.89
18.89
PM
g/lb
2.72
2.93
2.16
4 .69
1.64
0.71
0.35
1.41
Mode g/bhp— hr
Mode
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
HP
134.3
102.2
68.5
13.4
117.6
87.1
60.3
0.0
BSFC
Ib/hp-hr
0.367
0.383
0.426
1.038
0.334
0.327
0.317
NA
HC
g/bhp— hr
0.113
0.132
0.339
28.239
0.094
0.147
0.224
NA
CO
g/bhp-hr
4.626
3.902
2.677
31.644
2.675
0.601
0.453
NA
NO,
g/bhp— hr
7.526
6.039
5.379
7.027
9.643
8.449
7.895
NA
PM
g/bhp-hr
0.995
1.120
0.918
4.869
0.549
0.231
0.110
NA
8 -Mode
Weighted
BSFC
Ib/hp-hr
0.348
HC
g/bhp— hr
0.724
CO
g/bhp-hr
3.674
NO,
g/bhp— hr
7.468
PM
g/bhp-hr
0.857
-------
25
9. Ford New Holland Engine, Production Injection Timing
Testing/Results
9.1 Steady State Performance Evaluation
The Ford New Holland engine was installed in the test cell and
the torque and fuel flow data values were recorded and compared to
the engine manufacturer's data (see Table 9.1) . The data were
found to be similar and thus EPA judged the engine was operating
properly.
9.2 HP-FTP Transient Testing/Results
After the engine was torque mapped, two HD-FTP transient test
sequences were run. Average composite HC, CO, NOX, and PM levels
were determined to be 2.116, 5.288, 10.590, and 0.902 g/bhp-hr
respectively. The NOX level was near uncontrolled on-road levels,
and the PM was relatively high, especially considering the
relatively high NO, level. The HD-FTP test results for the
production injection timing Ford New Holland engine configuration
are presented in Table 9.2.
9.3 Steady State (8-Mode) Testing/Results
The steady-state test was performed twice on this engine
configuration. Average composite HC, CO, NOX, and PM levels were
determined to be 0.703, 5.575, 9.272, and 0.963 g/bhp-hr
respectively. The values for CO and PM were similar for both test
procedures, but HC and NO, were 66.8% and 12.4% lower on the 8-mode
steady-state test than on the HD-FTP. The detailed 8-mode steady-
state test results are presented in Tables 9.3 and 9.4.
-------
26
Table 9.1
Ford New Holland Engine, Production Injection Timing
Steady State Performance Data
LAB
FORD N.H. VALUES
EPA VALUES
TORQUE, FT-LB
1260 RPM
383.0
380.0
2100 RPM
318.0
322.0
FUEL FLOW, GAL/HR
1200 RPM
4.5
4.8
2100 RPM
7.0
7.2
Table 9.2
Ford New Holland Engine, Production Injection Timing
HD-FTP Transient Test Results
HC
(g/bhp-hr)
CO
(g/bhp-hr)
NOX
(g/bhp-hr)
PM
(g/bhp-hr)
First Sequence
Cold Start
Hot Start 11
Hot Start #2
Composite1
2.313
2.040
2.025
2.080
5.330
4.874
4.815
4.940
11.047
10.927
10.104
10.944
0.938
0.924
0.939
0.926
Second Sequence
Cold Start
Hot Start #1
Hot Start #2
Composite1
2.537
2.086
2.097
2.151
6.158
5.546
5.450
5.635
11.156
10.079
9.565
10.235
0.985
0.859
0.971
0.877
Average2 | 2.116 | 5.288 | 10.590
0.902
Composite - 1/7(Cold Start) + 6/7(Hot Start #1)
2Average of the 2 composite values.
-------
27
Table 9.3
Ford Hew Holland Engine, Production Injection Timing
8-Mod* Steady-State fl Emission Results
8-Mode Teat Points
Mode
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Speed
Rated
Rated
Rated
Rated
Int
Int
Int
Idle
Load %
100
75
50
10
100
75
50
0
Weighting
Factor
15%
15%
15%
10%
10%
10%
10%
15%
Speed
rpm
2100
2100
2100
2100
1260
1260
1260
875
Torque
ft-lb
322.0
242.7
164 .0
34.5
380.0
287.9
192.4
4.5
BHP
128 .8
97.0
65.6
13.8
91.2
69.1
46.2
0.7
Mode g/hr results
Mode
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
HP
128.8
97.0
65.6
13.8
91.2
69.1
46.2
0.7
Fuel
Ib/hr
50.64
33.75
25.32
12.67
33.81
23.24
14.8
2.25
HC
g/hr
8.29
53.62
75.11
113.34
18.78
43.35
50.29
29.02
CO
g/hr
1242.97
210.10
99.23
129.32
1070.87
84.56
55.16
49.07
NO,
g/hr
1137.29
892.27
587.02
165.95
750.66
699.08
447.02
65.71
PM
g/hr
211.85
42.79
33.33
29.23
118 .92
24.12
27. 10
4 .87
Mode g/lb fuel
Mode
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
HP
128.8
97.0
65.6
13.8
91.2
69.1
46.2
0.7
Fuel
Ib/lb
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
HC
g/lb
0.16
1.59
2.97
8.95
0.56
1.87
3.40
12.90
CO
g/lb
24.55
6.23
3.92
10.21
31.67
3.64
3.73
21.81
NO,
g/lb
22.46
26.44
23.18
13.10
22.20
30.08
30.20
29.21
PM
g/lb
4 .18
1.27
1.32
2.31
3.52
1.04
1.83
2.16
Mode g/bhp— hr
Mode
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
HP
128.8
97.0
65.6
13.8
91.2
69.1
46.2
0.7
BSFC
Ib/hp-hr •
0.393
0.348
0.386
0.918
0.371
0.336
0.321
NA
HC
g/bhp— hr
0.064
0.552
1.145
8.216
0.206
0.628
1.090
NA
CO
g/bhp— hr
9.654
2.165
1.513
9.375
11.746
1.224
1.195
NA
NO,
g/bhp— hr
8.833
9.195
8.952
12.030
8.234
10.121
9.684
NA
PM
g/bhp-hr
1.645
0.441
0.508
2.119
1.304
0.349
0.587
NA
8 -Mode
Weighted
BSFC
Ib/hp-hr
0.366
HC
g/bhp-hr
0.721
CO
g/bhp-hr
5.684
NOX
g/bhp-hr
9.244
PM
g/bhp-hr
0.970
-------
28
Table 9.4
Ford New Holland Engine, Production Injection Timing
8-Mod* Steady-State |2 Emission Results
8-Mode Teat Points
Mode
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Speed
Rated
Rated
Rated
Rated
Int
Int
Int
Idle
Load %
100
75
50
10
100
75
50
0
Weighting
Factor
15%
15%
15%
10%
10%
10%
10%
15%
Speed
rpm
2100
2100
2100
2097
1260
1260
1260
890
Torque
ft-lb
326.0
245.6
163.5
34.0
385.5
290.5
193.5
3.0
BHP
130.4
98.2
65.4
13.6
92.5
69.7
46.4
0.5
Mode g/hr results
Mode
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
HP
130.4
98.2
65.4
13.6
92.5
69.7
46.4
0.5
Fuel
Ib/hr
50.94
36.08
25.47
12.74
33.96
23.33
14.84
2.12
HC
g/hr
8.10
49.03
72.58
107.20
15.67
39.42
48.25
32.63
CO
g/hr
926.50
167.62
81.82
130.98
1549.84
57.31
56.60
46.61
NO,
g/hr
1138.54
875.08
714.77
142.26
751.48
686.01 .
429.46
47.66
PM
g/hr
216.20
46.50
31.32
30.02
106.55
21.46
24.95
7.29
Mode g/lb fuel
Mode
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
HP
130.4
98.2
65.4
13.6
92.5
69.7
46.4
0.5
Fuel
Ib/lb
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
HC
g/lb
0.16
1.36
2.85
8.41
0.46
1.69
3.25
15.39
CO
g/lb
18.19
4.65
3.21
10.28
45.64
2.46
3.81
21.99
NOX
g/lb
22.35
24.25
28.06
11.17
22.13
29.40
28.94
22.48
PM
g/lb
4.24
1.29
1.23
2.36
3.14
0.92
1.68
3.44
Mode g/bhp— hr
Mode
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
HP
130.4
98.2
65.4
13.6
92.5
69.7
46.4
0.5
BSFC
Ib/hp-hr
0.391
0.367
0.390
0.938
0.367
0.335
0.320
NA
HC
g/bhp-hr
0.062
0.499
1.110
7.896
0.169
0.566
1.039
NA
CO
g/bhp— hr
7.108
1.707
1.251
9.648
16.758
0.822
1.219
NA
NO,
g/bhp— hr
8.734
8.911
10.933
10.479
8.125
9.843
9.251
NA
PM
g/bhp— hr
1.659
0.474
0.479
2.212
1.152
0.308
0.537
NA
8 -Mode
Weighted
BSFC
Ib/hp-hr
0.308
HC
g/bhp-hr
0.684
CO
g/bhp-hr
5.466
NO,
g/bhp— hr
9.299
PM
g/bhp-hr
0.956
-------
29
10. Ford New Holland Engine, Retarded Injection Timing,
Testing/Results
10.1 Steady State Performance Evaluation
While the engine remained installed in the test cell, the
injection timing was retarded to approximately 4° BTDC from 8°
BTDC. The engine was then run at steady state conditions while
speeds, torques, and fuel flows were recorded. These values were
compared to the engine manufacturer's production engine, production
injection timing data (see Table 10.1) and minor differences in the
torque and fuel flow measurements were discovered. These
differences could be explained by the retarded injection timing and
thus EPA concluded that the engine was operating properly.
10.2 HP-FTP Transient Testing/Results
After the engine was torque mapped, two HD-FTP transient test
sequences were run. Average composite HC, CO, NOX, and PM levels
were determined to be 3.639, 5.902, 7.055, and 1.262 g/bhp-hr
respectively. As with the John Deere engine, NOX was reduced while
HC, CO, and PM increased due to the injection timing retardation.
The HD-FTP test results for the Ford New Holland engine retarded
configuration are presented in Table 10.2.
10.3 Steady State (8-Mode) Testing/Results
The steady-state test was performed twice with this engine
configuration. Composite HC, CO, NOX, and PM levels were
determined to be 1.397, 4.767, 5.895, and 1.310 g/bhp-hr
respectively. Through injection timing retardation, the HD-FTP
transient test showed NOX and PM changes of -33.4% and 39.9%
respectively, while the steady-state test showed comparable changes
of -36.4% and 36.0% for NOX and PM. These are very similar
changes. The detailed 8-mode steady-state test results are
presented in Tables 7.3 and 7.4.
-------
30
Table 10.1
Ford New Holland Engine, Retarded Injection Timing
Steady State Performance Data
LAB
FORD N.H. VALUES1
EPA VALUES
TORQUE, FT-LB
1200 RPM
383.0
386.0
2100 RPM
318.0
328.0
FUEL FLOW, GAL/HR
1200 RPM
4.5
4.8
2100 RPM
7.0
L 7.5
1Engine manufacturer's production engine, production injection timing data.
Table 10.2
Ford New Holland Engine, Retarded Injection Timing
HD-FTP Transient Test Results
HC
(g/bhp-hr)
CO1
(g/bhp-hr)
NOX
(g/bhp-hr)
PM
(g/bhp-hr)
First Sequence
Cold Start
Hot Start #1
Hot Start #2
Composite2
4.451
3.375
3.219
3.531
7.024
5.524
5.305
5.742
7.664
6.712
6.452
6.850
1.569
1.170
1.124
1.228
Second Sequence
Cold Start
Hot Start #1
Hot Start #2
Composite2
4.934
3.545
3.315
3.746
7.362
5.841
5.546
6.061
7.280
7.256
6.511
7.259
1.709
1.225
1.171
1.295
Average3
3.639 | 5.902
7.055
1.262
1CO was measured via continuous integration rather than bag sample, which was the
method used for all the other HD-FTP CO values reported. The author feels that this
factor has an insignificant impact on the results.
Composite = 1/7(Cold Start) + 6/7(Hot Start #1)
Average of the 2 composite values.
-------
31
10.3
Ford N*w Holland Kngina, R«t»rd«d Injection Timing
8-Mod* St««dy-3t«t« f1 Emission Result*
8-Mode Test Points
Mode
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Speed
Rated
Rated
Rated
Rated
Int
Int
Int
Idle
Load %
100
75
50
10
100
75
50
0
Weighting
Factor
15%
15%
15%
10%
10%
10%
10%
15%
Speed
rpm
2100
2100
2100
2100
1260
1260
1260
890
Torque
ft-lb
328.0
250.0
164 .0
41.0
386.0
292.0
198.0
5.5
BHP
131.2
100 .0
65.6
16.4
92.6
70.1
47.5
0.9
Mode g/hr results
Mode
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
HP
131.2
100.0
65.6
16.4
92.6
70.1
47.5
0.9
Fuel
Ib/hr
53.11
36.10
25.48
12.74
33.98
23.35
35.36
0.14
HC
g/hr
7.38
53.99
83.16
534.35
14.90
43.31
55.15
53.26
CO
g/hr
715.42
134.60
139.13
356.80
1007.56
59.78
78.98
73.22
NO,
g/hr
721.20
584.94
403.52
90.35
558.05
452.32
314.93
62.96
PM
g/hr
254.82
49.69
20.50
136.99
160.38
23.28
17.27
10.42
Mode g/lb fuel
Mode
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
HP
131.2
100.0
65.6
16.4
92.6
70.1
47.5
0.9
Fuel
Ib/lb
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
HC
g/lb
0.14
1.50
3.26
41.94
0.44
1.85
1.56
380.42
CO
g/lb
13.47
3.73
5.46
28.01
29.65
2.56
2.23
522.99
NOX
g/lb
13.58
16.20
15.84
7.09
16.42
19.37
8.91
449.72
PM
g/lb
4.80
1.38
0.80
10.75
4 .72
1.00
0.49
74.40
Mode g/bhp-hr
Mode
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
HP
131.2
100.0
65.6
16.4
92.6
70.1
47.5
0.9
BSFC
Ib/hp-hr
0.405
0.361
0.389
0.777
0.367
0.333
0.744
NA
HC
g/bhp-hr
0.056
0.540
1.268
32.595
0.161
0.618
1.161
NA
CO
g/bhp— hr
5.455
1.347
2.122
21.764
10.880
0.853
1.663
NA
NO,
g/bhp— hr
5.499
5.852
6.154
5.511
6.026
6.457
6.630
NA
PM
g/bhp-hr
1.943
0.497
0.313
8.356
1.732
0.332
0.364
NA
18 -Mode
Weighted
BSFC
Ib/hp-hr
0.320
HC
g/bhp— hr
1.403
CO
g/bhp-hr
4.601
NO,
g/bhp-hr
6.055
PM
g/bhp-hr
1.250
-------
32
Table 10.4
ford New Holland Engine, Retarded Injection Timing
8-Mod* Steady-State |2 Emission Result*
8 -Mode Teat Points
Mode
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Speed
Rated
Rated
Rated
Rated
Int
Int
Int
Idle
Load %
100
75
50
10
100
75
50
0
Weighting
Factor
15%
15%
15%
10%
10%
10%
10%
15%
Speed
rpm
2100
2100
2100
2100
1260
1260
1260
890
Torque
ft-lb
328.5
249.0
165.6
37.6
386.0
290.2
194 .0
5.0
BHF
131.3
99.6
66.2
15.0
92.6
69.6
46.5
0.8
Mode g/hr results
Mode
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
HP
131.3
99.6
66.2
15.0
92.6
69.6
46.5
0.8
Fuel
Ib/hr
50.94
36.08
25.47
12.74
36.08
23.34
14.84
2.12
HC
g/hr
10.87
56.26
79.63
531.22
18.29
42.04
52.15
45.49
CO
g/hr
758.39
170.03
112.67
534.77
951.06
68.15
59.72
89.11
NOX
g/hr
694.15
590.22
400.09
76.00
519.97
412.81
280.69
20.30
PM
g/hr
296.42
51.35
22.48
132.70
172.68
23.24
18.32
10.61
Mode g/lb fuel
Mode
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
HP
131.3
99.6
66.2
15.0
92.6
69.6
46.5
0.8
Fuel
Ib/lb
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
HC
g/lb
0.21
1.56
3.13
41.70
0.51
1.80
3.51
21.46
CO
g/lb
14.89
4.71
4.42
41.98
26.36
2.92
4.02
42.03
NO,
g/lb
13.63
16.36
15.71
5.97
14.41
17.69
18.91
9.58
PM
g/lb
5.82
1.42
0.88
10.42
4.79
1.00
1.23
5.00
Mode g/bhp-hr
Mode
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
HP
131.3
99.6
66.2
15.0
92.6
69.6
46.5
0.8
BSFC
lb/hp-hr
0.388
0.362
0.385
0.847
0.390
0.335
0.319
NA
HC
g/bhp-hr
0.083
0.565
1.203
35.334
0.197
0.604
1.121
NA
CO
g/bhp-hr
5.774
1.708
1.702
35.570
10.270
0.979
1.283
NA
NO,
g/bhp-hr
5.285
5.928
6.042
5.055
5.615
5.929
6.031
NA
PM
g/bhp-hr
2.257
0.516
0.339
8.826
1.865
0.334
0.394
NA
18 -Mode
Weighted
BSFC
lb/hp-hr
0.308
HC
g/bhp-hr
1.390
CO
g/bhp-hr
4.933
NO,
g/bhp-hr
5.735
PM
g/bhp-hr
1.369
-------
33
11. Analysis and Conclusions
Emission data were taken from a John Deere 6068T production,
1990 model year, off-highway, heavy-duty diesel engine with the
injection timing fixed at both a production and retarded position.
Through injection timing retardation, the HD-FTP transient test
showed NOX and PM changes of -47.7% and 144.9% respectively, while
the steady-state (8-mode) test showed changes of -46.1% and 158.1%
for NO, and PM.
While the engine injection timing remained in the retarded
condition, the production injectors were replaced with "modified"
injectors. These "modified" injectors were actually experimental
injectors provided by John Deere. They were designed to provide
better targeting of the fuel spray plume at retarded injection
timings.
In comparison to the retarded engine configuration using
production injectors, the "modified" injectors showed NOX and PM
changes of 15.6% and -20.5% respectively, over the steady-state
test. Similarly, the HD-FTP transient test showed changes of 6.9%
and -18.3% for NOX and PM, respectively. HC and CO were also
reduced over the steady-state and HD-FTP transient tests. All of
the data mentioned above are shown in the following table (Table
11.1):
-------
34
Table 11.1
Emissions Summary For John Deere 6068T Engine
HD-FTP Transient Test Emission Results
Engine Configuration
Production Injection Timing,
Production Injectors
Retarded Injection Timing,
Production Injectors
Retarded Injection Timing,
Modified Injectors
HC
CO
NOX
PM
g/bhp-hr
(g/kW-hr)
0.858
(1.151)
1.580
(2.119)
0.839
(1.125)
3.606
(4.836)
5.433
(7.286)
4.262
(5.715)
10.808
(14.494)
5.650
(7.577)
6.038
(8.097)
0.405
(0.543)
0.992
(1.330)
0.810
(1.086)
8-Mode Steady State Test Emission Results
Engine Configuration
Production Injection Timing,
Production Injectors
Retarded Injection Timing,
Production Injectors
Retarded Injection Timing,
Modified Injectors
HC
CO
NOX
PM
g/bhp-hr
(g/kW-hr)
0.427
(0.573)
0.933
(1.251)
0.774
(1.038)
3.144
(4.216)
4.770
(6.397)
3.564
(4.779)
11.758
(15.767)
6.340
(8.502)
7.327
(9.826)
0.422
(0.566)
1.089
(1.460)
0.866
(1.161)
Finally, a Ford New Holland production, 1991 model year, off-
highway, heavy-duty diesel engine was emission tested with the
injection timing fixed at both a production and retarded position.
As with the John Deere engine, NOX was reduced while HC, CO, and PM
increased over the HD-FTP transient test due to the injection
timing retardation.
Through injection timing retardation, the HD-FTP transient
test showed NO, and PM changes of -33.4% and 39.9% respectively,
while the steady-state test showed changes of -36.4% and 36.0% for
NOX and PM. HC and CO were also reduced over the steady-state and
HD-FTP transient tests (with the exception of CO for the steady-
state test) . The results for this engine are summarized in the
following table (Table 11.2):
-------
35
Table 11.2
Emissions Summary For Ford New Holland Engine
HD-FTP Transient Test Emission Results
Engine Configuration
Production Injection Timing
Retarded Injection Timing
HC
CO
NOZ
PM
g/bhp-hr
(g/kW-hr)
2.116
(2.838)
3.639
(4.880)
5.288
(7.091)
5.9021
(7.915)1
10.590
(14.201)
7.055
(9.461)
0.902
(1.210)
1.262
(1.692)
8-Mode Steady State Test Emission Results
Engine Configuration
Production Injection Timing
Retarded Injection Timing
HC
CO
NO,
PM
g/bhp-hr
(g/kW-hr)
0.703
(0.943)
1.397
(1.873)
5.575
(7.476)
4.767
(6.393)
9.272
(12.434)
5.895
(7.905)
0.963
(1.291)
1.310
(1.757)
lThis value incorporates data which was measured via continuous integration rather
than a bag sample, which was the method used for all the other HD-FTP CO values
reported. The author feels that this factor has an insignificant impact on the
results.
-------
Appendices
A Fuel Specifications
B Particulate Measurement Procedure
C Federal On-Highway Smoke Testing Results Memorandum
D Raw Transient Test Emission Data
E Raw 8-Mode Steady-State Test Emission Data
-------
A. Fuel Specifications
T^
laoraory epor
PHILLIPS 66 COMPANY
A SUBSOIAfly Of PHILIPS PETROLEUM COMPANY
SPECIALTY CHEMICALS
P.O. 3OX 968
3CSGER. TX 79008-0968
LlliiTUtf P~2
API Gravity
Corrosion. 50C, 2 hrs
Sulfur vtt
Flash Point *?. PH
Pour Point *P
Cloud Point *?
Viaeosicy.es 40e
Sulfur, vtt
Carbon, vtt
Hydrogen, vtt
Net Heat of Combustion
Particular Matter(ng/l)
Cetane Index
Catane Number
DTSTTLIATTtJll.
P^STTLTS
34.8
U
0.2429
130
-45
+4
2.6
0.26
86.4
11.2
18,094
8.5
46.5
46.0
IBP
5%
10%
15%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
95%
EP
Loss
a«.idu«
Aroaatics
Olefins
Saturates
364
424
441
453
462
479
495
509
524
538
556
580
600
622
0.0
7..S
36.4
2.1
61.5
LOT S-16&
33-37
Report
0.20-0.50
130 Mia.
Report
Report
2.0-3.2
0.20-0.50
Report
Report
Report
15 Max
43-47
42-50
340-400
400-460
470-540
550-610
580-660
27 Bin.
OATS 07 SuIPHEHT
06-14-91
CUSTOMER. ORDER NO.
5700-09733
IH7./RZQH. HO.
04339S
TOA-mra no.
452
METHOD
ASTH 0
ASTM 0
ASTH D
ASTM D
ASTH 0
ASTH D
ASTH D
ASTM 0
• 1298
•130
•4294
•93
.2500
•2500
.445
-3120
ASTH D-3338
ASTH D-2276
ASTH 0-976
ASTH D-613
ASTH 0-86
ASTH 0-1319
100.0
VRK/LK:Uf
06/14/1991
-------
B. Particulate Measurement Procedure
Study Suit Partkulatt Maafurtnaot Extaplt Uiio| Full Exhauit Dilution
Introduction.
Tha primary objaoiw ofobtaifliaf a pirdfiulatt flltar Mmnte U to detarmia* thaaaftaaixhauic
paffailita tlfna&sfc SSaet this paricultta tipit&neaBMttmuchtfifficdoQtftumeaiaeme
ti the mjlPt4ttifp, tntfif o piidtufttt •*
optiooi, filter pmaamen (iliai, ccmpeddoai* wdghing tad cocditicnifl| poetdaret ),
caiibndoaofpiniculittfyitBm, tadttttMqucneMinnfitdttiiUdbcrin&etihMim in
40 CFR Ptti 86-Sabptn N, 3AB J21I3, tod ISO tt?t
la addMoa to tfaa above fuidilinei, the foUowinf cx*mpl« U offtetd to illusntt IB overview of
how t rypietl itudy itaii ptidcuUti meaiuremeat ii pMfbnntd. TtetustsiiMibrtUiumplA
proecdun U 1 160 n ovbochirpd lad tftireooltd dk»l eafiBA exhaastinf ma a fell dilution
leeoadaiy, or both oaul flowt would oatd 10 ba idjuiied iceotdiafly, •.!., priauiy
(oaaei flow lowv by about half tot ta Mho enfiai, or hi|b« by ibout two fart 300
Ike* tunatl ftowi ire eitmuu only, not at ruala of energy nliMM btcauit txiet etleulAioo
require knowkdfB of th« hits tou cntnctalitiet of
SchtmtUc
!^Mowin|iktidiiUui«ituth§tBaJoriyf«mpttUiBdflo«t: en|im nhanit (a^X mtia
tucmi diludoa air (m^dUuadtthi&itiafflpliftom main cuaail (m^ flow from m»in wno»l
(mi), tad flow from iccondiryoiantKmj), DUudo0ikflowto(hoitG00diiytttaBeiUaoc
rnonad btctait tha will diffor from tysum » lyitsou dopeadi&|oahMSloiiN»iadUmttitbf
idfrnod to obtain »fllw»mpenajn«5a*Corlow«f. AerUktlflowvtatufi(GFV)with&
nomlttdU80icfmflowri«wuuiidfbrthtmiinmftft«llnthii«implf, Plow iiconiutt with
tGFVexot«fbriUfhtdifl)nioetiftomfflodttofflodtdu6totta»e?iBm vtriitioflt. IVvo
Th« leooodiry fflttr
ptrdculitB mus am* bt tddtd to thi miin fQtv pineulatB to dranriattbt total paraeulaamtst.
Tin filter tHBptfituit ii adjuiitd by ?h")t*"| tht ttrwlify tufwtl 4i^Hflfl flow rttt* Syttani
with maui tuaatl potUiveduplaeaaattpuiBM (PDF) eaa oflir tht option of fllw temptnon
eonooi with «ithar main or twoodary wnael flow tdjuranano. Italians or madyra*
lowv. OtfaaftMiptftine«a»cnumAiniuim«ldlluti»r^
tuaaal flow, tte. caa difffer from lynam to tyitam without violadnf tha tait validity, bus prudaact
lugpstt that laba pU&oio| to compart data ihouid katp eonitaoi ai many tyioun paramaien as
pouibla.
ada "icofldary tunnal
1
mi partculaie flltan
maintunml f—-^miUlSOidta)
-------
£afiae Warm Up
Beta btfbmini the l-mode test, wtnn up the ongiM ts foil lotd trod ipeed until exhaait
»mp«w»Uwbl*»wtAln3»CforiooeminuJitimip«riod. SubiUa^cnii&ett each node
to ifihiiw tbt 5 *C txhtBtt topennre for one minute except idle. which should laMlitefcrS
tninutti without matte ttmpmout. Raced thiinitaicpexitini rime iptm during
Between tstt modes thi pentailate fflten sod fucoai emittta bt|i must be chtofed. Ubi th«
ire tblt topcffann thsae tuki with tbt eafiai runninf should proceed to the next test point for
ennas laMttuttoL Lrti thucaaaot permit tiwenglni to niaduriag b4|iad filler ebnpiihouid
fallow tht proocdiaf rtquind to chinge fllten without tha ettfiao raod&t, miaimise tht
downdmi, rtttm te Mfiae, ni v» u the S 0C mount ttmptfitunitibilliy point uiooay
poitiblB tad doeasum tat durtoon of eagtnt downdms, pou tbt worn up ladditaneoidini
dot*. F<»thtidkmo^tfthe«fl|l»hubc«noffform t^nntt «***fr**1"* *~*ti***t ^ **•* -• ^ff**g ** jncrifft ran ihrnM bt
tdequiatt»JurifUtertettpcriturt«o<32^0ftowtf itiUotheyccwhriflnt. Some dilution
r tecondsry dilution
r iaouftt can ampenufc for bat iccumultfloo ind achieve 3l*C filter tempensuit,
ObUiaiBf FQier Del*
After thi en|intwinn*up iixiprBaittnJttegirdietm completed^
minute urpecifledihove. Tben?itewin|ttbkUlu«r»»»ctujdditt obtained udelrt
The rued pom (modl4)wisttt 3:1 dUutioortBofbr this wimple. Statist tests st other libs
miyoot be able »«tteve 3:1 dilution naourtted. A|encnlttri«nnieiil:l to6:l urtad.
wlm proportOBii nfeses Ibr modes 1-3 tad M.
The f^ter^pefsu«Mttnodes 1.7 indlsrc lower thin the 42 *C minimum limit ipedfled In
•-•*•*-—• • • ••• • • "-•—*—*—•—•—T tOTiiei floy M cfn*ti?nt tt 11 *0
_
iichinie. Mode 8 (idle) wttlpmem
difficulty tince *•; idle point exhiait tempertaue U lew, u ii the ptrtcalitertte, which will
require ioof uapiedmiT&cdlectiaf idionuefiltviMtt. Alta^Jow dttodoBii desired tt
thu point to keeoteapenun U|h ind umpli) dmtf tow, thi triaiiemcwlflctdoa test iinu with
uioa letldU pants, to t more eccarue iimalidoBofthetriajiimteiiii«pectidJfthe
cauul flow'nte ii not chinnd is idle. If temple rimes needed to collect *dequ*te filter
e^lOmiaom(theBiaskwtestti0pl»tiflw)ttBB20iai&^ If
test astdi beyond A* scope of the cuatnt iavesdodoa roquiie tpeeUl ttw«onto»lowpertcal*«
"
-------
Stapl* Data
MM tiMMMv mar, iin nfe primtry tuul flow,
vii.. „ ^ » • •* * /mil* r,da ud
fro. ft* m* ft nap** TUI ttlll U ab i. m.*«
fr«a ttoM utati if u» to l«k eoaprfeoai IN
Mode R?M lead miu tep? ,"Jr ,«K % VWu- Samplt
(mi) CO (icfeD(icto) uapfc. ajU4o
Mt rtd. 100 4.4 59 370 1.65 .14 3 10
m nd. 100 4.2 52 370 1.65 .14 3 10
i lot 50 2.4 35 164 1.65 .14 7 10
2 int 75 2.1 42 171 1.65 .14 7 10
3 tat. 100 4.6 47 202 1.65 .14 6 10
4 rtd. 100 4.2 52 370 1.65 .14 3 10
5 nd. 75 3.1 50 336 1.65 .14 4 10
6 rtd. 50 3.2 46 307 1.65 .14 4 10
7 rat 10 2.1 38 250 1.63* .14 A 3 10
8 idle 0 1.9 23 92 1.65* .14* 13 10
* Siapte flown* M •pocra of oiinniaul flew, lOOVnyilSO
AM! a* b* toum* foriUmtltiLbttiinjlif flowflttl
SSS*
Uchs ptftlcttlut lotd petal, toe* M then Maodfltd by "*".
••
Optloni
T^ flow Candidas aeid nab*4uplfc*^ Tbflow
0« will oifltr from mam miywft.
tempmtuRiihitw«t««a below 52*C. A rop tyityn wiA i vifliQlc Wwf drivt M«M
n *C {Of lH nOdll by dieNlllfll tKi pcb^tonnelfbw,bttcfarUboniaie«tfiitexptct
rtditt-thipriBurynMflilflowtihouldbturimUirMpQIliWfl, la iddttfefc Hfitt
iOD8 Of HDOal Ifld BUUlMt dAta tff to bt nidt u iiffliltt *ft eonditieai, the study>ratB
tera ihodd bt patand is eloitiy u pouibl* to «niit«i eoodidoni, which mnatteonrant
tuinttioalfiovitiu. v«
S8OOiiflf Hlflthodt tM*lld ttfiit ftr tfat Mot tttwil pruniiy if^^tf^fl ndoi u full
nmad Ubt thtt will bt pan at dm compuliai.
if lflittqu» flltt mm ii edkcad ind the twt poim u o/
(tUt idl^illtofflltfmuillcoUacttd. AA(B4tti|tOQOCUIldOUhlA
t? iocmx te flter nun, provide
X ottoitr.
I to ISO
uodflnaodinf ofthiiittoWeetivt. ^«umpii,th«m«myialaniioocifltdtoIS08nior
SAB J21U out bi wiNd W idb due to in low cttoibataa to ovtnu l-modi ptrtfittka nun if
nixiDuai idlt owdi mm
-------
C. Federal On-Highway Smoke Testing Results Memorandum
-------
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
ANN ARBOR. MICHIGAN 48105
29 1993
OFFICE OF
AIR AND RADIATION
MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Heavy-Duty Engine Smoke Testing - Non-Road Engine
Configurations, Injection Timing Effects
FROM: Hark H. Doorlag, Prjzr^^^^K^rt^T^^^
Technology Evaluat^d^/aixl' Tfes£i*l^Jkrp~port Branch
THRU: Thomas M. Baines, Send^xxr^Technical Advisor ~|//'''^YV. .
Technology Evaluation*""a~nd Testing Support Branch
TO: John F. Anderson, Chief
Technology Evaluation and Testing Support Branch
This memo contains smoke exhaust test results from the two
non-road heavy-duty diesel engines (five engine configurations)
described in Table 1. The 1990 model year John Deere 6068T was a
turbocharged, in-line 6-cylinder, 6.8 L displacement heavy-duty
diesel engine. Rated and peak torque speed for this direct
injection engine were 2200 and 1300 RPM, respectively, with a rated
horsepower of 139 hp (103.7 kW) .
The 1991 model year Ford New Holland heavy-duty diesel engine
was an in-line 6-cylinder, 7.5 L displacement, with no
turbocharging. Rated speed and peak torque speeds for this direct
injection engine were 2100 and 1200 RPM respectively, with a rated
horsepower of 127 hp (94.7 kW) .
The modified injectors used with the John Deere 6068T engine
were actually experimental injectors provided by John Deere. They
were designed to provide better targeting of the fuel spray plume
at retarded injection timings.
A modified version of the Federal on-highway smoke test was
performed on each of the three John Deere 6068T engine
configurations and on each of the two Ford New Holland engine
configurations. These tests were not intended to yield Federal
Smoke Test Procedure results, but rather were performed in order to
observe the directional change in smoke levels due to injection
timing changes. Many tests failed the cycle statistic requirements
and all of them utilized an exhaust pipe with a 4.5 inch diameter
rather than the required 3.0 inch diameter. The results are
presented immediately after Table 1 .
-------
Table 1
Engine Configuration Specifications
Manufacturer
Model
Use
Engine Serial Number
Model Year
Rated Power (bhp)
Rated Speed (rpm)
Peak Torque (ft-lb)
Peak Torque Speed (rpm)
Injection Timing (°BTDC)
Injectors
Cylinders
Cylinder Configuration
Bore x Stroke (in)
Displacement (in3 - liter)
Aspiration
Aftercooling
John Deere
6068T
Log-Skidder
JDPRODT6068T35JL
1990
139
2200
467
1300
151 - 72
Product.3 Product.3 Modified
6
in-line
4.19 x 5.0
414 - 6.8
turbo
none
Ford New
Holland
Ag. Tractor
358/117-91-89V
1991
127
2100
383
1200
81 ~ 42
Product . 3
6
in-line
4.4 x 5.0
456 - 7.5
natural
none
Production injection timing.
2Retarded injection timing.
3Preduction.
John Deere 6068T Engine, Production In-jection Timing,
Production Injectors
The average acceleration, lug, and peak smoke values were
determined to be 12.6%, 8.6%, and 22.2% respectively. The detailed
Federal smoke teat results are presented in Table 2.
-------
2. John Deere 6068T Engine, Retarded Injection Timing, Production
Injectors
The average acceleration, lug, and peak smoke values were
determined to be 20.1%, 19.7%, and 41.1% respectively. Through the
use of injection timing retardation, the HD-FTP smoke test showed
acceleration, lug, and peak smoke increases of 59.5%, 129.1%, and
85.1% respectively. The detailed smoke test results are presented
in Table 3 -
J3 John Deere 6068T Engine, Retarded Injection Timing. Modified
Injectors
In comparison to the retarded engine configuration using
production injectors, the "modified" injectors showed acceleration,
lug, and peak smoke increases of 16.4%, 1.0%, and 14.6%,
respectively, over the HD-FTP smoke test. Yet, the particulate
levels (for the particulate results see the EPA Heavy-Duty Engine
Testing Report, Non-Road Engine Configurations, Injection Timing
Effects, Test Results - 1992, EPA-AA-TETSB-93-01) were lower using
the "modified" injectors. This was an unexpected result that could
not be explained with the data taken. The detailed smoke test
results are presented in Table 4.
4. Ford New Holland Engine, Production Injection Timing
The average acceleration, lug, and peak smoke values were
determined to be 11.2%, 26.2%, and 26.7% respectively. The
detailed smoke test results are presented in Table 5.
5_ Ford New Holland Engine, Retarded Injection Timing
The average acceleration, lug, and peak smoke values were
determined to be 20.6%, 34.2%, and 34.8% respectively. Through the
use of injection timing retardation, the HD-FTP smoke test showed
acceleration, lug, and peak smoke increases of 83.9%, 30.5%, and
30.3% respectively. The detailed smoke test results are presented
in Table 6.
_6 Conclusions
The introduction of injection timing retardation to the John
Deere 6068T engine produced an acceleration, lug, and peak smoke
increase of 59.5%, 129.1%, and 85.1% respectively. Also, in
comparison to the retarded engine configuration using production
injectors, the "modified" injectors showed acceleration, lug, and
peak smoke increases of 16.4%, 1.0%, and 14.6%, respectively, over
the smoke test (see Table 7).
The introduction of injection timing retardation to the Ford
New Holland engine produced an acceleration, lug, and peak smoke
increase of 83.9%, 30.5%, and 30.3% respectively (see Table 8).
-------
Table 2
John Deere 6068T Engine, Production Injection Timing,
Production Injectors Smoke Test Results
T(
3
4
Ave
5St
1
2
Avg
rage
Acceleration (%)
16.0
13.3
10. 6
12.6
Lug (%)
12.7
9.9
5. 9
8.6
Peak (%)
24.5
25.1
19.6
22.2
Linearity (rpm)
96.7
96.7
99.0
97. 9
Table 3
John Deere 6068T Engine, Retarded Injection Timing,
Production Injectors Smoke Test Results
Test
I1
2
31
41
51
61
Average
Acceleration (%)
18.2
19.0
20.7
20.1
22.0
20.7
20.1
Lug (%)
18.5
18.0
18.6
19.6
21.5
22.0
19.7
Peak (%)
37.4
42.4
42.7
42.9
43.9
37.1
41.1
Linearity (rpm)
101.3
94.7
103.0
109.3
104.7
106.0
103.2
xThe test failed cycle statistic requirements,
-------
Table 4
John Deere 6068T Engine, Retarded Injection Timing,
Modified Injectors Smoke Test Results
Test
Acceleration (%)
I1 26.6
21
31
41
51
61
Average
25.0
21.7
21.1
23.2
22.5
23.4
Lug (%)
22.1
22.1
18.6
17.8
19.3
19.4
19.9
Peak (%)
51.5
47.5
44.3
44.9
48.0
46.1
47.1
Linearity (rpm)
109.0
104.3
109.7
109.3
109.0
109.0
108.4
xThe test failed cycle statistic requirements,
Table 5
Ford New Holland Engine, Production Injection Timing
Smoke Test Results
Test
I1
21
3
41
Average
Acceleration (%)
11.4
10.7
12.2
10.3
11.2
Lug (%)
26.2
26.2
26.3
26.1
26.2
Peak (%)
26.8
26.6
27.0
26.4
26.7
Linearity (rpm)
102.3
102.7
92.3 ,
100.0
99.3
;The test failed cycle statistic requirements
-------
Table 6
Ford New Holland Engine, Retarded Injection Timing
Smoke Test Results
Test
I1
O 1
31
41
Average
Acceleration (%)
18.5
23.7
21.2
18.9
20.6
Lug (%)
34.9
36.0
32.9
32.8
34.2
Peak (%)
35.6
36.8
33.5
33.4
34.8
Linearity (rpm)
107.7-
107.7
106.7
106.0
107.0
xThe test failed cycle statistic requirements
Table 7
John Deere 6068T Engine Smoke Testing - Summary
Smoke Test Results
Engine Configuration
Production Injection Timing,
Production Injectors
Retarded Injection Timing,
Production Injectors
Retarded Injection Timing,
Modified Injectors
Acceleration
Lug
Peak
%
12.6
20. 11
23. 41
8.6
19. 71
19. 91
22.2
41. 11
47. 11
values incorporate some data from individual Federal smoke
tests which were invalid due to speed deflections greater than 100
rpm.
-------
Table 8
Ford New Holland Engine Smoke Testing - Summary
Federal On-High'way Smoke Test Results
Engine Configuration
Production Injection Timing
Retarded Injection Timing
Acceleration
Lug
Peak
%
11. 21
20. 61
26. 21
34. 21
26. 71
34. 81
'•These values incorporate some data from individual Federal smoke
tests which were invalid due to speed deflections greater than 100
rpm.
-------
HD-910247
999 JDPRODT6068T35JL 0
IB circ
Tast Number: HO-910247
Ta»t Data/Time: 8-22-91 7:
AMBIENT DATA
Barometer: 29.02
Dry Bulb Temperature: 84.10
Abcoluta Humidity: 57.99
EMISSION RESULTS
MC (INTEGRATED)
Background, PPM
C*haust»Bkq. Gm
Nat. Gm/Bhp-Hr
CO (BAG)
Background. PPM
C«hau«t«Bkq, Gm
Nat, Gm/Bhp-Hr
NOX (INTEGRATED)
Backqiound. PPM
EfthausttUkq, Gm
Nat. Gm/Bhp-Hr
IUAOI
bdCkqround. PPM
C»luuuttBfcg. G«
Mat, Ga/Bhp-Hr
PAHTICULAT
Sacondacy Tara, CM
Sacomtoiv Part, CM
Prlaary Tata, CM
PriMty t'art, CH
Total,
HEAVY UUTY UlLStL TRANSIENT 01GALOG TEST DATE: Ob/22/91 TIMK: U:2fc:JI HACll:
DIESEL SUMMARY REPORT
Manufacturer: EXPERIMENTAL
Englna ID: 999 JOPRODT6068T35JL 0
FUEL CONSUMPTION
Lb»/Carb> n Balance
Lbs/Bhf-llr
"HG
F
Grains U20 / U>. Dry Air
CS HS WTO TEST
BRAKE
3.93
13.20
.000
2.20
46.12
.00
1.00
121.22
.000
.039
6392.1?
.0
.156138
.156243
.156405
.160155
.43
.000
.000
4.465
10.51b
.00
.00
.000
.00
.00
.00
.000
.00
.0
.000000
.000000
.000000
.000000
.00
.000
.000
.000
.000
1.031
4.19
.00
.00
.000 10.859
537.1
.43
3.906
.371
CYCLE STATISTICS
SPEED
Nkwbur
Slope
(Llalt: 0.97-1.03)
Y- Intercept
(Llalt: «-50 RPM)
Sid Error
(Limit: 100 RPM)
R-Squara
(Llalt: 0.97)
TORQUE
Number
Slope
(Limit: 0.77/0. 83-1. 03)
Y-Intercept
(Limit: «-15 Fl-Lbsl
Std Error
(Limit: 13« Man £119 Tq)
R-Squara
(Limit: 0.85/0.88)
POWER
Niwber
Slopa
(Limit: 0.87/0.89-1.03)
Y- Intercept
(Limit; «-5 BHP)
Sid Error .
(Limit: 81)
R-Squara
(Limit: 0.91}
WOKK
Actual
(Limit: -15%-b* Ket Bt.p
Kcteiencu
» Dllfuiencu
CS
10.51i
HS
11 J5
.99498
14.056
17.916
.99875
997
.99563
0
.00000
.000
.000
.00000
0
.00000
-5.b52 .000
5.121% .0001
.96570 .00000
991 0
.99334 .00000
-1.711 .000
5.7481 .000*
.96827 .00000
.000
c,
0
cr
o
o
»
h
o
cr\
o
at
OD
H
PJ
3
*Q
H-
a
«o
K
X O
D a
i c
m o
H ft
•O H-
- O
3
O
O n
I- 3
a«-j-
a
m n
rt
-------
HD-91024B
999 JDPBODT6068T35JL
IB usir
Test Number: HO-910248
Teat Date/Time: 8-22-91 8:
38
HEAVY DUTY DIESEL TRANSIENT D1GALOG TEST DATE: 00/22/91 TIME: 17:33:39
DIESEL SUMMARY REPORT
Manufacturer: EXPERIMENTAL
Enqlne 10: 999 JOPROOT6068T35JL 0
AMBIENT DATA
Barometer:
Dry Bulb Temperature:
Absolute Humidity:
EMISSION RESULTS
HC (INTEGRATED)
Background, PPM
Exhaust«Bkg, Cm
Nat, Gm/Bhp-Hr
CO (BAG)
Background, PPM
Exhaust»Bkg, Cm
Net, Gm/Bhp-Hr
NOX (INTEGRATED)
Background. PPM
29.02
83.40
•0.21
Nwl, Ca/Bhp-Hr
CO2 IliACl
PPM
, Ca
NaL, G«/Bnp*HK
PAKTICULATE
S«cono\iiy Tare, CM
S«condUiy Part, CM
Prl*try Tar«, CM
Primary Part, CM
Total, Ca/Bbp-Hr
FUEL CONSUMPTION
Lbs/CatlxMt Balance
Lbs/Bnp if
U>s/Mua ured
bKAKE IIOH'. v
"HG
F
Grains U20 / Lb. Dry Air
CS US WO TEST
.00
.00
.000
.00
.00
.00
4.00
11. M
.000
2.20
42.41
.00
.00 1.00
.00 116.81
.000 .000
.000 .OU
.00 6146.U
.0 .0
.000000 . ibt>aei
.000000 .156050
.000000 .151980
.000000 .155598
.00
.41
.000 .000
.000 .000
.000 4.111
.000 10.449
.818
3.80
519.9
.41
.359
CYCLE STATISTICS
SPEED
Numbur
Slope
(Limit: 0.91-1.03)
Y-Intercept
(Limit: «-50 RPM)
Std Error
(Limit: 100 RPM)
R-Square
(Limit: 0.97)
TORQUE
Numbur
Slope
(Limit: 0.11/0.83-1.03)
Y-Intercept
(Limit: <-15 Fl-Lbs)
Sid Error
(Limit: 13% Max Eng Tql
R-Square
(Limit: 0.85/0.88)
POWER
Number
Slope
(Limit: 0.81/0.89-1.03)
Y-Intercept
(Limit: t-5 BHP)
Sid Erior
(Limit: 8t)
R-Square
(Limit: 0.91)
WOKK
Actual
(Limit: -ltil-5% Hel Blip-lift
CS
HS
c,
O
o
o
»
h
a
a\
o
as
oo
M
3
UK
1115
.99443
13.597
11.776
.99877
997
.99654
-6.654
5.503t
. 96067
997
. 99406
-2.136
6.229t
.96300
.000
.000
.00%
11/5
.99443
13.597
11.116
.99877
997
.99654
-6.654
5.503%
. 96067
997
.99406
-2.136
6.229%
.96300
10.44'J
10/11
-1 . ti'jt
3
O
t>
n
T O
tK f\
?c
n
0 »
U t-»
^5.
&
s§
^H
H**
H-
<0
•O
n
o
d-
5
n
ft
H-
o
3
M
3
l_J-
a
o
rt
o
h
u
I I'-Jl
DATt:
llMi.:
-------
HO-910249
999 JDPRODT6068T35JL 0
IB HI3F
uurir DitstL TRANSIENT DIGALOG TEST OATH: o«/22/9i Tint: ri-.w-.n
DIESEL SUMMARY REPORT
Test Number: HO-910249
Test Date/Time: 8-22-91 9
AMBIENT DATA
Barometer: 29^2
Dry Bulb Temperature: 83.00
Absolute Humidity: 62.03
EMISSION RESULTS
HC (INTEGRATED)
Background. PPM
Exhaust «bkq. Cm
Net, Gm/Bhp-llr
CO (BAG)
Background. PPM
Exhaust «Ukg, Cm
Nat. Gm/Bhp-Hr
NOX (INTEGRATED)
Background, PPM
Exhaust »Bkq, Cm
Nut, Gm/Bhp-Hr
C02 (UAG)
Background, PPM
Exhaust tBkq. Cm
Net, Gm/Bhp-Hr
PAHT1CULATE
Secondary Tare. GM
Secondary Part, GM
Primacy Tare, GM
Primary Part. GM
Total. Gm/Bhp-Hr
FUEL CONSUMPTION
Lbs/Carbon Balance
Lbs/Bhp-Hr
U>s/Muasuied
BRAKE HOHSI I'OWEH-IIOUR
Manufacturer: EXPERIMENTAL
:17
T
"HG
F
Engine ID: 999
JOPROOT606UT35JL 0
Grains H20 / Lb. Dry Air
CS
.00
.00
.000
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.000
.000
.00
.0
. 000000
.000000
.000000
.000000
.00
.000
.000
.000
.000
HS WTO TEST
4.23
11.69
.000 .878
1.98
39.92
.00 3.60
1 .00
1 1 7 . 62
.000 10.729
.033
6035.50
.0 516.9
.15634'
.156536
.154878
.158141
.39 .39
.000 3.720
.000 .357
4.111
)0.42b
CYCLE STATISTICS
SPEED
NuiuUir
Slope
(Limit: 0.97-1.03)
Y-lntercept
(Limit: «-50 RPM)
Std Error
(Limit: 100 RPMI
R-Square
(Limit: 0.97)
TOROUE
Number
Slope
(Llmll: 0.77/0. 03-). OJ|
Y-lniercept
(Limit: «-15 Ei-Lbs)
Sid Error
(Limit: 13% Max Eng T«j)
R-Square
(Limit: 0.85/0.88)
POWER
Number
Slope
(Limit: 0.87/0.89-1.03)
Y-Intercept
(Limit: «-5 BIIP)
Sid Error
(Limit: 0%)
R-Square
(Limit: 0.91)
WOKK
Actual
(Limit: -15%-5% Rut Ulip-lli)
l\
|
3
a
0
a
h
a
m
o
a\
a>
H
n
3
•fl
I—
3
a
13
xo
a9-
4
3
?•-,
o tr
«*5.
?s
K H-
^S
MHJ
H-
H-
3
01
•o
h
o
a
c
o
ft
H-
O
3
M
3
i i-
a
o
ft
o
h
u
-------
HO-910259
999 JOPRODT6068T35JL 0
IB CSI3
litAVl OUT* UltbtL THANSIENT DIALOG TKST
DIESKL SUMMARY REPOHT
OATH: OU/2b/91 Tint: U::>2:'j4
I-AL.I:
Test Number:
Test Daie/Tli
AMBIENT DATA
Barometer:
HD-910259
8-28-91 U:
Manufacturer: EXfLhlMtNTAI.
Engine ID: 999 JDPRUOT60bttT35JL 0
29.25 BMC
Dry Bulb Temperature: 84.70
Absolute Humidity: 60.63
EMISSION RESULTS
UC (INTEGRATED)
Background, PPM
ExhausttBkg, Gm
Mat, Cm/Bnp-Hr
CO (BAG)
Background, PPM
Exhaust«Bkg, Gm
Net, Gm/Bhp-Hr
NOX I INTEGRATEDI
Background, PPM
Exhaust«Bkq, Cm
Nut, Gm/Bhp-llr
CO? (BAG)
Background. PPM
Net, Gm/Bhp-Hr
PARTICULAR
Secondary Part. CM
Primary Tare. CM
Primary Part. CM
Total.
CONSUMPTION
Lbs/Carbon Baiance
Lbs/Bhp-Mr
BKAKt.
Grains H20 / Lb. Dry Air
CS HS HTD TEST
CYCU STATISTICS
CS
a
a
a
h
en
o
a\
a>
M
3
4.00
13.38
.000
3.31
43.28
.00
1 .00
1^1 .87
.000
.041
6504.66
.0
158910
.159113
.158008
.161892
.52
.000
.000
4.465
10.1,41
.00
.00
.000 1.040
.00
.00
.00 3.72
.00
.00
.000 10.962
.000
.00
.0 542.9
.000000
.000000
.000000
.000000
.00 .52
.000 3.952
.000 .375
.000
.000
SPEED
Number
Slope
(Limit: 0.97-1.03)
t- Intercept
(Limit: «-50 RPM)
Std Error
(Limit: 100 RPM)
R-Squate
(Limit: 0.97)
TORQUE
Number
Slope
(Limit: 0.77/0.83-1 .OJ|
Y- Intercept
(Limit: <-15 t'i-l.bs)
Std Error
(Limit: 13% Max Eng Tq)
R-Squaie
(Limit: 0.85/0.88)
POWER
Number
Slope
(Limit: 0.87/0.89-1.03)
y- Intercept
(Limit: «-5 BIIPI
Std Error
(Limit: 8%)
H- Square
(Limit: 0.91)
WUHK
Annul
(l.lmll : -lt>l-'j» Hcl Uhi'-IU
11 'b
.99512
14.161
17.521
. 998UO
997
.99618
-5.362
5.1641
.9651B
«*9 1
.99382
-1.645
5.727»
. ytbjj
10.511
I
0
.00000
.000
.000
. 00000
0
.00000
.000
.0001
. 00000
0
.00000
.000
.0001
.00000
.oou
(-•-
3
*
T3
n
X O
O (X
1 C
tr] o
1-J ft
•n H-
- o
3
n
0 HI
t- 3
ID
to O
ft ft
p, 1-..
h o
ft 3
K) H
H-
9
H-
3
'
•o
h
Q
a
c
Q
ft
H-
O
3
M
3
i_i.
a
rt
o
h
u
l<.-I«-ii;nc»j
» I'll leiui
10. It I .OOti
-I . m .001
UAH : uu/;u/-tl I | HI . II.''•':-'•! HI' ^
-------
HD-910260
999 JDPROOT6068T3:>JL 0
IB HSiS
lltAVY UU1Y DIESEL THANSILNT D1GALOG TEST DATE: G5/2U/9I TIME: U:'_>*:40 j-Ai.l'
DIESEL SUMMAHY KEKM4T
Test Nu«U»r:
Test Oal«/Tl«e:
AMBIENT DATA
HO-910260
8-28-91 e
ManulacLuier: EXPERIMENTAL
Engine 10: 999 JDPROOT6068T35JL 0
Barometer:
Dry Bulb Temperature:
Absolute Humidity:
EMISSION RESULTS
HC (INTEGRATED)
Background, PPM
Exhaust*Bkg, Cm
Nat. Gm/Bhp-Hr
CO (BAG)
Background. PPM
Exhaust«Bkg, Cm
Nat. Gm/Bhp-Hr
NOX (INTEGRATED)
1, PPM
). Cm
Nut, Gm/Bhp-Hr
C02 (BAG)
Background. PPM
ExhausttUkg, Cm
Net. Gm/Bhp-Hr
PARTICULATE
Secondary Taie, CM
Secondaiy Part, CM
Primary Tare, CM
Primary Part, CM
Total, Gm/Bhp-Hr
FUEL CONSUMPTION
Uis/Carbon Balance
Lbs/Bhp-Hr
29.2b
64.70
63.63
BHAKE IIOHUEPOMEH-IIOUH
•HG
e
Grain* H20 / U>. Dry Air
CS HS WTO TEST
CYCLE STATISTICS
IIS
.00
.00
.000
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.000
.000
.00
.0
000000
000000
000000
000000
.00
.000
.000
.000
.000
4.38
10.71
.000 .778
3.09
38.13
.00 3.29
1 .00
120.21
.000 10.994
.037
6221.32
.0 t>27.1
.159493
.159649
.151627
.155020
.38 .38
.000 3.793
.000 .363
4.111
10.443
SPEED
Number
Slope
(Limit: 0.97-1.03)
t- Intercept
(Limit: »-50 RPM)
Std Error
(Limit: 100 RPM)
R-Square
(Limit: 0.9V)
TORQUE
Number
Slope
(Limit: 0.77/0.83-1.03)
Y-Iniercept
(Limit: «-15 FL-Lbs)
SLd Error
(Limit: 13% Max Eng Tq)
R-Squate
ji |~|r . f\ UK/A AAk
(LiimiL. U.Oj/U.OOf
POWER
Number
Slope
(Limit. 0.87/0.89-1.03)
Y-Intercept
(Limit: »-5 BMP)
SLd Error
ii 4 _ | » . Qftk
(Limit: at)
R-Squaie
(Limit: 0.91)
WORK
Acludl
(l.lmli: -15%-5% Re( Blip-IU)
UfteiL'ncti
1 Ullfeiehcu
HVb
.99461
13.63V
17.833
.99876
99V
.99610
-6.9M
5.608%
.95918
Vtl
.99473
-2.248
6.3221
.9619V
.000
.000
.00%
11 Vb
.99461
13. b3/
17. 833
.998V6
99 /
.99610
-6.9V4
b.60b%
.959lb
'J9/
.9947)
-2.24b
6.3221
.9bl9/
10.44 J
10. / II
-S . li)\
O
3
O
(I
0
h
-------
HD-910261
999 JDPRODT606BT35JL
IB HSI6
HtAVY DUTY OltSEL TRANSIENT DIGALOG TEST
DIESEL NUMMARY REPORT
DATE: OH/2B/91 TIME: 14:0!>:4b I'AUI:
Test Nuttber:
Te«t Data/Tlae:
AMBIENT DATA
HD-910261
8-28-91 9:26
Manufacturer:
Engine 10:
EXPERIMENTAL
999 JOPROOT6068T35JL
Baroaater:
Dry Bulb Teaperature:
Absolute Hualdlty:
EMISSION RESULTS
29.25 "HG
84.40 F
62.46 Grains U20
CS
I Lb. Dry Air
US WTO TEST
CYCLE STATISTICS
CS
UC (INTEGRATED)
Background. PPM
Exhaust »Bkg. Ga
Nat. Ga/Bhp-Hr
CO (BAG)
Background, PPM
Exhaust «Bkg, Cm
Nat. Ga/Bnp-Hr
NOX (INTEGRATED)
Background, PPH
Exhaust »Hkg, Ga
Nat. Ga/Bhp-Hr
CO2 lUAGI
Background, PPM
Exhaust tBkg, Ga
Nat. Ga/Bhp-Hr
PAMTICULATE
Sacondary Tara, CM
Sacondary Part. CM
Prlaary Tara. CM
Prlaary Part. CM
Total. Ga/Bhp-Hr
FUEL CONSUMPTION
Lbs /Carbon Balance
Lbs/Bhp-Hr
Lbs/Maasurad
BRAKE HORSEPOWER-HOUR
.00
.00
.000
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.000
.000
.00
.0
.000000
.000000
.000000
.000000
.00
.000
.000
.000
.000
4.38
10.44
.000 .747
2.87
38.98
.00 3.40
1 .00
118.29
.000 10.789
.037
6103.57
.0 515.8
.158496
.158644
.153243
.156705
.39 .39
.000 3. Ml
.000 .356
4.040
10.438
SPEED
Number
Slopa
(Llalt: 0.97-1.03)
Y- Intercept
(Llalt: «-50 RPHI
Std Error
(Llalt: 100 RPM)
R-Square
(Llalt: 0.97)
TORQUE
Nuaber
Slope
(Llalt: 0.77/0.83-1.03)
Y- Intercept
(Llalt: »-15 Ft-Lb*)
Sid Error
(Llalt: 13% Max Eng Tql
R- Square
(LlaU: 0.85/0.88)
POWER
Nuaber
Slopa
(Llalt: 0.87/0.89-1.03)
Y- Intercept
(Llalt: *-5 BMP)
Std Error
(Llalt: 8%)
R- Square
(Llalt: 0.91)
WORK
Actual
(l.lmli: -15%-5% Ret bhp-llr)
Hut el enct!
% Ul 1 lmcnce
1175
.99439
13.617
18.083
.99872
997
.99506
-6.887
5.717%
.95757
997
.99330
-2.226
6.449%
.96038
.000
.000
.001
1 1 /i
.99439
13.617
18.0U3
.99U72
99 /
. 99506
-6.au)
5.717%
.9575;
997
.99330
-2.226
6.449%
.960)8
10.4 JU
10/11
-J . /tii
o
d
o
h
o
tn
3
9
33 ._,
•XJ
H
O
o
rt
O
ft
o
K
It
UAH : Od/.'b/'JI 'I I Ml!: I1:u',:-rj HU '
-------
HD920035
999 JDPRODT6068T35JL 0
IB CS1R
HEAVY DUTY DIESEL TRANSIENT TEST
DIESEL SUMMARY REPORT
DATE: 04/06/92 TIME: 14:11:0/ [>Ar,E:
Test Number:
Test Date/Time:
HD-920035
2-26-92 8:35
Manufacturer:
Enylne ID:
EXPERIMENTAL
999 JDPRODT6068T3SJL 0
AMBIENT DATA:
Barometer:
Dry Bulb Temperature:
Absolute Humidity:
EMISSION RESULTS:
HC (INTEGRATED):
Background,PPM
Exhaust+Bkg, Cms
Net, Gm/Bhp-Hr
CO (BAG):
Background, PPM
Exhaust+Bkg, Cms
Net, Gms/Bhp-Hr
NOX (INTEGRATED):
Background, PPM
Exhaust+Bkg, Gms
Net. Gms/Bhp-Hr
C02 (BAG)
Background, PPM
ExhausttBkg, Gits
Net, Gms/Bhp-Hr
PARTICULATE:
Secondary Tare, Gms
Secondary Part, Gms
Primary Tare, Gms
Prlnary Part, Gms
Total, Gms/Bhp-Hr
FUEL CONSUMPTION:
Lbs/Carbon Balance
Lbs/Bhp-Hr
Lbs/Measured
BRAKE HORSEPOWER-HOUR:
28.86 "HG
78.50 F
50.33 Grains H20/Lbs Dry Air
CS
3.03
23.29
2.204
.00
59.63
6.10
.26
59.69
5.694
.031
6510.88
605.7
.156380
.156593
.155841
.168147
1.13
4.129
.423
4.536
9.769
CYCLE STATISTICS: CS
SPEED:
Number 1175
Slope .99518
(Limit: 0.97-1.03)
Y-Intercept 7.954
(Limit: +-50 RPM)
Std Error 43.943
(Limit: 100 RPM)
R-Square .9929b
(Limit: 0.97)
TORQUE:
Number 997
Slope .96734
(Limit: 0.77/0.83-1.03)
Y-Intercept -5.948
(Limit: t-15 Ft-Lbs)
Std Error 6.887*
(Limit: 13* Max Eng Tq)
R-Square .93461
(Limit: 0.85/0.88)
POWER:
Number 997
Slope .95781
(Limit: 0.87/0.89-1.03)
Y-Intercept -1.512
(Limit: +-5 BHP)
Std Error 7.069*
(Limit: 84)
R-Square .94734
(Limit: 0.91)
WORK:
Actual 9.769
(Limit: -15*-b» Ref Bhp-Hr)
Reference 10.230
» Difference -4.bl*
c,
o
V
3
o
»
a
h
a
a\
o
a>
pi
3
i«
a
•jo
X It
D (f
I O
"1 H
H a
•a o
- a.
n M
o D
H-v-J-
a. o
o
w rt-
rt H-
(u o
h 3
ft
H-
O
ft
H-
O
a
o
rt
o
h
a
ib
<_• s i n
OATE: 04/00/92 TIME: 11:I I :OH
-------
HD9200:ib
999 JUI'RODT606«T3!5Jl. 0
IB HS1R
IIKAVY DUTY DIESEL TRANSIENT TEST
DIESEL SUMMAKY REPORT
DATE: 04/06/92 TIME: 11: It: 11 I'ACK
Test Number:
Test Date/Time:
HD-920036
2-26-92 9:16
Manufacturer:
Engine ID:
EXPERIMENTAL
999 JDPUODT6068T35JL 0
AMBIENT DATA:
Barometer: 28.86 "HG
Dry Bulb Temperature: 78.90 F
Absolute Humidity: 107.02 Grains H20/UDS Dry Air
EMISSION RESULTS: HS
CYCLE STATISTICS:
. HS
o
3
HC (INTEGRATED):
Background,PPM
ExhausttBkg, Cms
Net, Gm/Bhp-Hr
CO (BAG):
Background, PPM
ExhausttBkg, Cms
Net, Gns/Bhp-Hr
NOX (INTEGRATED):
Background, PPM
ExhausttBkg, Cms
Net, Gms/Bhp-Hr
CO2 (BAG)
Background, PPM
ExhausttBkg, Cms
Net, Gas/Bhp-Hr
PARTICULATE:
Secondary Tare, Cms
Secondary Part, Cms
Primary Tare, Cms
Primary Part, Cms
Total, Gffls/Bhp-Hr
FUEL CONSUMPTION:
Lbs/Carbon Balance
Lbs/Bhp-Hr
Lbs/Measured
BRAKE HORSEPOWER-HOUR:
4.84
18.39
1.616
.00
52.42
5.44
1.03
51.72
5.634
.033
6223.61
582.3
.154985
.155121
.157527
.168359
1.00
3.898
.405
4.111
9.630
SPEED:
Number H~'5
Slope .99443
(I.lmlL: 0.97-1.03)
Y-Intercept 7.803
(Limit: +-50 RPM)
Std Error 43.909
(Limit: 100 KPMI
R-Square .99295
(Limit: 0.97)
TORQUE:
Number 997
Slope .96688
(Limit: 0.77/0.83-1.03)
Y-Intercept -8.447
(Limit: *-15 FL-LJbs)
Std Error 7.168%
(Limit: 13% Max Eng Tq)
R-Square .92950
(Limit: 0.85/0.88)
POWER:
Number 997
Slope .95546
(Limit: 0.87/0.89-1.03)
Y-Intercept -2.140
(Limit: +-5 BHP)
Std Error 7.307%
(Limit: 8%)
R-Square .94367
(Limit: 0.91)
WORK:
Actual 9.630
(Limit: -15»-5% l M.'UU it;
-------
HD920037
999 JDPRODT6068T35JL 0
IB HS2R
HEAVY DUTY DIESEL TRANSIENT TEST
DIESEL SUMMARY REPORT
DATE: 04/07/92 TIME: 0<>:41:4^ I'AliK:
lest Number:
rest Date/Time:
HD-920037
2-26-92 9:57
Manufacturer:
Enq1ne ID:
EXPERIMENTAL
999 JDPRODT6068T35JL 0
.MBIENT DATA:
•-arometer: 28.84 "HG
iry Bulb Temperature: 78.90 f
•Josolute Humidity: 59.46 Grains H2O/Lbs Dry Air
c,
o
tr
MISSION RESULTS:
!C (INTEGRATED) :
Background,PPM
Exhaust+Bkg, Cms
Net, Gm/Bhp-Hr
O (BAG):
Background, PPM
Exhaust+Bkg, Cms
Net, Gms/Bhp-Hr
JOX (INTEGRATED):
Background, PPM
ExhausttBkg, Cms
Net, Gms/Bhp-Hr
l:O2 (BAG)
Background, PPM
ExhausttBkg, Cms
Net, Gms/Bhp-Hr
PARTICULATE:
Secondary Tare, Cms
Secondary Part, Gas
Primary Tare, Cms
Primary Part, Gras
Total, Gms/Bhp-Hr
FUEL CONSUMPTION:
Lbs/Carbon Balance
Lbs/Bhp-Hr
Lbs/Measured
BRAKE HORSEPOWER-HOUR:
HS
5.15
16.9?
1.436
.00
47.70
4.91
.77
57.20
5.506
.031
6154.80
572.9
.155656
.155768
.157392
.167566
.93
3.865
.397
4.111
9.725
CYCLE STATISTICS: HS
SPEED:
Number 1175
Slope .99481
(Limit: 0.97-1.03)
Y-Intercept 6.796
(Limit: »-50 RPM)
Std Error 37.947
(Limit: 100 RPM)
R-Square .99473
(Limit: 0.97)
TORQUE:
Number 997
Slope .97259
(Limit: 0.77/0.83-1.03)
Y-Intercept -7.712
(Limit: <-15 Ft-Lbs)
SLd Error 6.879%
(Limit: 13% Max Eng Tq)
R-Square .93542
(Limit: 0.85/0.88)
POWER:
Number 997
Slope .95920
(Limit: 0.87/0.89-1.03)
Y-Intercept -1.780
(Limit: «-5 BHP)
Std Error 7.171%
(Limit: 8%)
R-Square .94603
(Limit: 0.91)
WORK:
Actual 9.725
(Limit: -lb%-5% Ret Bhp-Hr)
Reference 10.230
% Difference -4.94%
en
o
a\
CD
PI
SO
X *
°sr
1 1-4
•O
H
O
a
c
a
ft
H-
o
3
-------
HD920040
999 JDPROOT6068T35JL 0
IB CS2R
HEAVY DUTY DIESEL TRANSIENT TEST
DIESEL SUMMARY RETORT
DATE: 04/06/92 TIME: 14:28:31 PAGE.
Test Number:
Test Date/Time:
AMBIENT DATA:
HD-920040
2-27-92 8:46
Manufacturer:
Engine ID:
EXPERIMENTAL
999 JDPKODT6068T35JL 0
Barometer:
Dry Bulb Temperature:
Absolute Humidity:
EMISSION RESULTS:
28. 77 "HG
75.60 F
58.94 Grains H20/Lbs Dry Air
HC (INTEGRATED):
Background, PPM
Exhaust tBkg, Cms
Net, Go/Bhp-Hr
CO (BAG) :
Background, PPM
ExhausttBkg, Cms
Net, Gms/Bhp-Hr
NOX (INTEGRATED):
Background, PPM
ExnausttBkg, Cms
Net, Gms/Bhp-Hr
CO2 (BAG)
Background, PPM
Exhaust+Bkg, Cms
Net, Gns/Bhp-Hr
P ARTICULATE:
Secondary Tare, Cms
Secondary Part, Gas
Primary Tare, Cms
Primary Part, Cms
Total, Gms/Bhp-Hr
FUEL CONSUMPTION:
Ubs/Carbon Balance
Lbs/Bhp-Hr
Lbs/Measured
BRAKE HORSEPOWER-HOUR:
CS
3.94
20.54
1.871
.00
60.27
6.17
.51
61.28
5.926
.031
6762.32
632.5
.157116
.157255
.152955
.161142
1.05
4.300
.440
4.678
9.768
CYCLE STATISTICS:
CS
SPEED:
Number 1 175
Slope .99661
(Limit: .0.97-1.03)
Y-Intercept 8.167
(Limit: t-50 RPM)
Std Error 44.125
(Limit: 100 RPM)
R- Square .99292
(Limit: 0.97)
TORQUE:
Number 997
Slope .96496
(Limit: 0.77/0.83-1.03)
Y-Intercept -5.107
(Limit: t-15 Ft-Lbs)
Std Error 6.168*
(Limit: 13% Max Eng Tq)
R-Square .94662
(Limit: 0.85/0.88)
POWER:
Number 997
Slope .95656
(Limit: 0.87/0.89-1.03)
Y-Intercept -1.186
(Limit: t-5 BHP)
Std Error 6.608%
(Limit: 8%)
R-Square .95357
(Limit: 0.91)
WORK:
Actual 9.768
(Limit: -15*-5% Ret Bhp-Hr)
Reference 10.230
% Difference -4.52%
o
3
a\
o
W
3
iQ
I—
D
0
X 0>
a rt
I ft>
«i M
H a
t> m
- a
o M
o 3
1-4-1-
a. it
o
in ri-
ft H-
0> O
h 3
ft
H
NJ h"
H-
13
h
O
a
c
0
ft
H-
O
-------
HD920041
999 JDPRODT6068T35JL 0
IB HS3R
HEAVY DUTY DIESEL TRANSIENT TEST
DIESEL SUMMARY REPORT
DATE: 04/06/92 TIME: H:30:!>1 I'ACK:
Test Number:
Test Date/Time:
AMBIENT DATA:
HD-920041
2-27-92 9:28
Manufacturer:
Engine ID:
EXPERIMENTAL
999 JDPRODT6068T35JL 0
c,
O
Barometer:
Dry Bulb Temperature:
Absolute Humidity:
28.77 "HG
77.80 F
59.39 Grains H2O/Lbs Dry Air
a
a
a
EMISSION RESULTS: HS
HC (INTEGRATED):
Background,PPM 3.94
Exhaust+Bkg, Cms 15.85
Net, Gm/Bhp-Hr 1.390
CO (BAG):
Background, PPM .00
Exhaust+Bkg, Cms 50.69
Net, Gms/Bhp-Hr 5.19
NOX (INTEGRATED):
Background, PPM .26
Exhaust+Bkg, Cms 57.56
Net, Gms/Bhp-Hr 5.611
CO2 (BAG)
Background, PPM .033
Exhaust+Bkg, Cms 6379.82
Net, Gms/Bhp-Hr 588.3
PARTICULATE:
Secondary Tare, Cms .155330
Secondary Part, Cms .155426
Primary Tare, Cms .153587
Primary Part, Gms .160992
Total, Gms/Bhp-Hr .95
FUEL CONSUMPTION:
Lbs/Carbon Balance 3.988
Lbs/Bhp-Hr .408
Lbs/Measured 4.253
BRAKE HORSEPOWER-HOUR: 9.774
CYCLE STATISTICS: HS
SPEED:
Number 1175
Slope .99667
(Limit: 0.97-1.03)
Y-Intercept 6.997
(Limit: +-50 RPM)
Std Error 38.105
(Limit: 100 RPM)
R-Square .99471
(Limit: 0.97)
TORQUE:
Number 997
Slope .97093
(Limit: 0.77/0.83-1.03)
Y-Intercept -6.428
(Limit: t-15 Ft-Lbs)
Std Error 6.517*
(Limit: 13* Max Eng Tq)
R-Square .94147
(Limit: 0.85/0.88)
POWER:
Number 997
Slope .95846
(Limit: 0.87/0.89-1.03)
Y-Intercept -1.373
(Limit: t-5 BHP)
Std Error 6.972*
(Limit: 8t)
R-Square .94877
(Limit: 0.91)
WORK:
Actual 9.774
(Limit: -15*-5* Ref Bhp-Hr)
Reference 10.230
* Difference -4.46*
o
a>
oo
ra
3
2.
•O
h
O
a
o
rt
H-
0
3
a
o
rt
O
M
u
999 J|)|'KOI)T60bBT I'jJI. 0
DATE: 04/0(>/92 TIME: I1:'i0:!,| |ll)->j?l)011
-------
HD920042
999 JDPRODT6068T35JL 0
IB HS4R
HEAVY DUTY DIESEL TRANSIENT TEST
DIESEL SUMMARY REPORT
DATE: 04/06/92 T1MK: 14:33:02 HACK:
Test Number:
Test Date/Time:
HD-920042
2-27-92 10:
Manufacturer:
Engine ID:
EXPERIMENTAL
999 JDPRODT6068T3SJL 0
AMBIENT DATA:
Barometer:
Dry Bulb Temperature:
Absolute Humidity:
EMISSION RESULTS:
HC (INTEGRATED):
Background,PPM
Exhaust+Bkg, Gms
Net, Gm/Bhp-Hr
CO (BAG):
Background, PPM
Exhaust+Bkg, Gms
Net, Gms/Bhp-Hr
NOX (INTEGRATED):
Background, PPM
Exhaust+Bkg, Gms
Net, Gms/Bhp-Hr
CO2 (BAG)
Background, PPM
Exhaust+Bkg, Cms
Net, Gms/Bhp-Hr
PARTICULATE:
Secondary Tare, Gms
Secondary Part, Gms
Primary Tare, Gms
Primary Part, Cms
Total, Gms/Bhp-Hr
FUEL CONSUMPTION:
Lbs/Carbon Balance
Lbs/Bnp-Hr
Lba/Measured
BRAKE HORSEPOWER-HOUR:
28.78 "HG
81.80 F
60.26 Grains H2O/U>s Dry Air
HS
4.24
15.52
1.357
.00
47.53
4.93
.51
57.52
5.648
.030
6210.22
587.6
.157804
.157944
.156801
.164095
.94
3.927
.407
4.253
9.641
CYCLE STATISTICS: HS
SPEED:
Number H"'5
Slope .99526
(Limit: 0.97-1.03)
Y-Intercept 8.038
(Limit: t-50 RPM)
Std Error 43.932
(Limit: 100 RPM)
R-Square .99296
(Limit: 0.97)
TORQUE:
Number 997
Slope .97023
(Limit: 0.77/0.83-1.03)
Y-Intercept -8.823
(Limit: t-15 Ft-Lbs)
Std Error 6.848%
(Limit: 13% Max Eng Tq)
R-Square .93567
(Limit: 0.85/0.88)
POWER:
Number 997
Slope .95902
(Limit: 0.87/0.89-1.03)
Y-Intercept -2.172
(Limit: + -5 BHP)
Std Error 7.110*
(Limit: 8t)
R-Square .94688
(Limit: 0.91)
WORK:
Actual 9.641
(Limit: -151-5% Ref Bhp-Hr)
Reference 10.230
% Difference -5.76%
o
3"
3
a
a
o
h
a
o
a\
CD
w
a
S:
, a
I
f
H-
3
TJ
K
o
a
o
ft
o
3
a
0
ft
o
M
u
Ill HS1K
999 JDPKODTbObUTJ5JL 0
DATE: 04/06/92 TIMK: II: IJ:02 |ll)-9.'00-12
-------
HD920048
999 JDPRODT6068T35JL 0
IB CSN2
HEAVY DUTY DIESEL TRANSIENT TEST
DIESEL SUMMARY REPORT
DATE: 04/06/92 TIME: H:4:i:40 I'ACE.
Test Number:
Test Date/Time:
HD-920048
3- 3-92 10: 7
Manufacturer:
Engine 10:
EXPERIMENTAL
999 JDPRODT606HT35JL 0
AMBIENT DATA:
Barometer: 29.29 "HG
Dry Bulb Temperature: 83.70 F
Absolute Humidity: 63.78 Grains H2O/Lbs Dry Air
a
a
EMISSION RESULTS:
HC (INTEGRATED):
Background,PPM
Exhaust+Bkg, Cms
Net, Gm/Bhp-Hr
CO (BAG):
Background, PPM
Exhaust+Bkg, Cms
Net, Gros/Bhp-Hr
NOX (INTEGRATED):
Background, PPM
Exhaust+Bkg, Cms
Net, Gms/Bhp-Hr
C02 (BAG)
Background, PPM
Exhaust+Bkg, Cms
Net. Gms/Bhp-Hr
PARTICULATE:
Secondary Tare, Cms
Secondary Part, Cms
Primary Tare, Cms
Primary Part, Cms
Total, Gms/Bhp-Hr
FUEL CONSUMPTION:
Lbs/Carbon Balance
Lbs/Bhp-Hr
Lbs/Measured
BRAKE HORSEPOWER-HOUR:
CS
4.84
13.99
1.135
.00
50.00
5.08
.77
61.27
5.907
.035
6614.20
604.1
.153219
.153384
.153168
.159948
.89
4.112
.418
4.395
9.833
CYCLE STATISTICS: CS
SPEED:
Number 117S
Slope .99706
(Limit: 0.97-1.03)
Y-Intercept 7.647
(Limit: t-50 RPM)
Std Error 43.532
(Limit: 100 RPM)
R-Square .99311
(Limit: 0.97)
TORQUE:
Number 997
Slope .97565
(Limit: 0.77/0.83-1.03)
Y-Intercept -6.333
(Limit: t-15 Ft-Lbs)
Std Error 6.464*
(Limit: 13% Max Eng Tq)
R-Square .94288
(Limit: 0.85/0.88)
POWER:
Number 997
Slope .96496
(Limit: 0.87/0.89-1.03)
Y-Intercept -1.428
(Limit: +-5 BHP)
Std Error 6.846*
(Limit: 8%)
R-Square .95114
(Limit: 0.91)
WORK:
Actual 9.833
(Limit: -15*-5* Ret Bhp-Hr)
Reference 10.230
* Difference -3.8b»
o
0
rt ri-
h o
ft 3
3.
o
a
H-
H>
(-••
o
a
o
o
rt
o
M
U
lll)-'>.'l)l)1M
-------
HD920049
999 JDPRODT6068T35JL 0
IB HSN3
HEAVY DUTY DIESEL TRANSIENT TEST
DIESEL SUMMARY REPORT
DATE: 04/16/92 TIME: 12:21:31 PACE:
Test Number:
Test Date/Time:
AMBIENT DATA:
HD-920049
3- 3-92 10:47
Manufacturer:
Engine ID:
EXPERIMENTAL
999 JDPRODT6068T35JL 0
Barometer:
Dry Bulb Temperature:
Absolute Humidity:
EMISSION RESULTS:
HC (INTEGRATED):
Background,PPM
Exhaust*Bkg, Cms
Net, Ga/Bhp-Hr
CO (BAG):
Background, PPM
ExhausttBkg, Cms
Net, Gms/Bhp-Hr
NOX (INTEGRATED):
Background, PPM
ExhausttBkg, Cms
Net, Gms/Bhp-Hr
CO2 (BAG)
Background, PPM
ExhausttBkg, Cms
Net, Gms/Bhp-Hr
PARTICULATE:
Secondary Tare, Cms
Secondary Part, Cms
Primary Tare, Cms
Primary Part, Cms
Total, Gms/Bhp-Hr
FUEL CONSUMPTION:
Lbs/Carbon Balance
Lbs/Bhp-Hr
Lbs/Meaaured
BRAKE HORSEPOWER-HOUR:
29.28 "HG
85.80 F
62.63 Grains H20/Lbs Dry Air
HS
4.84
10.58
.791
.63
41.09
4.12
.77
61.23
5.906
.033
6276.54
576.6
.158028
.158108
.158470
.164425
.79
3.897
.398
4.111
9.800
CYCLE STATISTICS: HS
SPEED:
Number 1175
Slope .99689
(Limit: 0.97-1.03)
Y-Intercept 6.591
(Limit: +-50 RPM)
Std Error 37.855
(Limit: 100 RPM)
R-Square .99478
(Limit: 0.97)
TORQUE:
Number 997
Slope .97765
(Limit: 0.77/0.83-1.03)
Y-Intercept -7.332
(Limit: t-15 Ft-Lbs)
Std Error 6.534%
(Limit: 131 Max Eng Tq)
R-Square .94194
(Limit: 0.85/0.88)
POWER:
Number 997
Slope .96490
(Limit: 0.87/0.89-1.03)
Y-Intercept -1.583
(Limit: t-5 BHP)
Std Error 7.051%
(Limit: 8%)
R-Square .94832
(Limit: 0.91)
WORK:
Actual 9.800
(Limit: -15%-5% Ref Bhp-Hr)
Reference 10.230
% Difference -4.20*
o
3
O
a
o
a\
CD
M
H 3.
"o 2-
o
o.
H-
Ml
I-
o
o.
It
o
(t
o
M
u
Hi HSN3
999 JDI'UODTOUUUT ib.Jl. 0
DATE: 01/1 u/'J.' 'I'lME: 1.': ; I : 11
-------
HD920050
999 JDPRODT6068T35JL 0
IB HSN4
HEAVY DUTY DIESEL TRANSIENT TEST
DIESEL SUMMARY REPORT
DATE: 04/06/92 TIME: 14:4b:28 PACK:
Test Number:
Test Date/Time:
AMBIENT DATA:
HD-920050
3- 3-92 11:26
Manufacturer:
Engine ID:
EXPERIMENTAL
999 JDPRODT6068T35JL 0
Barometer:
Dry Bulb Temperature:
Absolute Humidity:
EMISSION RESULTS:
HC (INTEGRATED):
Background,PPM
Exhaust+Bkg, Cms
Net, Gn/Bhp-Hr
CO (BAG):
Background, PPM
Exhaust+Bkg, Cms
Net, Gms/Bhp-Hr
NOX (INTEGRATED):
Background, PPM
ExhausttBkg, Cms
Net, Gms/Bhp-Hr
C02 (BAG)
Background, PPM
Exhaust*BKg, Cms
Net, Gms/Bhp-Hr
PARTICULATE:
Secondary Tare, Cms
Secondary Part, Cms
Prlnary Tare, Cms
Prlnary Part, Cms
Total, Gms/Bhp-Hr
FUEL CONSUMPTION:
Lbs/Carbon Balance
Lbs/Bhp-Hr
Lbs/Measured
BRAKE HORSEPOWER-HOUR:
29.28 "HG
84.00 K
63.56 Grains H20/Lbs Dry Air
HS
5.45
10.19
.716
.63
39.50
3.96
.7";
61 .23
5.930
.033
6279.87
577.9
.158887
.159050
.157479
.163105
.75
3.896
.398
4.111
9.782
CYCLE STATISTICS: IIS
SPEED:
Number . 1175)
Slope .99639
(Limit: 0.97-1.03)
Y-Intercept 6.446
(Limit: +-50 RPM)
Std Error 37.643
(Limit: 100 RPM)
R-Square .99483
(Limit: 0.97)
TORQUE:
Number 997
Slope .98083
(Limit: 0.77/0.83-1.03)
Y-Intercept -8.062
(Limit: t-15 Ft-Lbs)
Std Error 6.547%
(Limit: 13% Max Eng Tq)
R-Square .94207
(Limit: 0.85/0.88)
POWER:
Number 997
Slope .96576
(Limit: 0.87/0.89-1.03)
Y-Intercept -1.719
(Limit: *-5 BHP)
Std Error 7.062%
(Limit: 8%)
R-Square .94825
(Limit: 0.91)
WORK:
Actual 9-782
(Limit: -15%-5% Ref Bhp-Hr)
Reference 10.230
% Difference -4.38%
c,
o
a
it
en
o
"I
*•
ti
1 £
H
H-
H-
a
•3.
O
a
a
a
a
o
rt
o
n
u
HD-4200 ')0
1H IISN4
999 JDPKODTfaOf>«T t^JI. 0
DATE: U4/U6/9? TIME: M:1:j:/'H
-------
HD-920051
IB CS3N
999 JUPRODT6068T35JL 0
DATE: 04/06/92 TIMK: 14:bO:L,B lll)-9200'j|
HD920051
999 JDPRODT6068T35JL 0
IB CS3N
HEAVY DUTY DIfc'.SEL TRANSIENT TEST
DIESEL SUMMARY REPORT
DATE: 04/06/92 TIME: 14:bO:rj« lw;E: b
Test Number:
Test Date/Time:
HD-920051
3- 4-92 9:23
Manufacturer:
Engine ID:
EXPERIMENTAL
999 JDPRODT6068T35JL 0
c,
O
AMBIENT DATA:
Barometer: 29.2V "HG
Dry Bulb Temperature: 77.80 F
Absolute Humidity: 59.46 Grains H2O/Lbs Dry Air
EMISSION RESULTS:
HC (INTEGRATED) :
Background,PPM
Exhaust+Bkg, Cms
Net, Gm/Bhp-Hr
CO (BAG):
Background, PPM
Exhaust+Bkg, Cms
Net, Gms/Bhp-Hr
NOX (INTEGRATED):
Background, PPM
£xhaust+Bkg, Cms
Net, Gms/Bhp-Hr
C02 (BAG)
Background, PPM
Exhaust+Bkg, Cms
Net, Gms/Bhp-Hr
PABTICULATE:
Secondary Tare, Cms
Secondary Part, Cms
Primary Tare, Cms
Primary Part, Cms
Total, Gms/Bhp-Hr
FUEL CONSUMPTION:
Lbs/Carbon Balance
Lbs/Bhp-Hr
Lbs/Measured
BRAKE HORSEPOWER-HOUR:
CS
3.94
14.71
1.261
.63
53.14
5.32
.26
66.49
6.446
.041
6875.39
620.4
.157429
.157580
.157535
.164536
.94
4.228
.430
4.465
9.839
CYCLE STATISTICS: CS
SPEED:
Number }\'lb
Slope .99683
(Limit: 0.97-1.03)
Y-Intercept 7.892
(Limit: t-50 RPM)
Std Error 43.852
(Limit: 100 RPM)
R-Square .99301
(Limit: 0.97)
TORQUE:
Number 997
Slope .97648
(Limit: 0.77/0.83-1.03)
Y-Intercept -5.892
(Limit: t-15 Ft-Lbs)
Std Error 6.290*
(Limit: 13% Max Eng Tq)
R-Square .94584
(Limit: 0.85/0.88)
POWER:
Number 997
Slope .96156
(Limit: 0.87/0.89-1.03)
Y-Intercept -1.196
(Limit: t-5 BHP)
Std Error 6.728%
(Limit: 8%)
R-Square .95241
(Limit: 0.91)
WORK:
Actual 9.839
(Limit: -15%-5% Ret Bhp-llr)
Reference 10. 2'JO
% Dltloic-nco -J.82H
o
(t
o
a\
CD
H
pi
a
ia
H-
o
I ft
"1 01
H h
•o o.
- ID
a
o
o M
I- D
in 0
rf rf
CD H-
h o
ft 3
M H
a.
H-
Ml
a
a
ft
o
-------
D920052
99 JDPRODT6068T35JL 0
B HS5N
HEAVY DUTY DIESEL TRANSIENT TEST
DIESEL SUMMAKY REPORT
DATE: 01/06/92 TIME: 14:bb:2b 1'AGt:
st Number:
SSL Dace/Time:
HD-920052
3- 4-92 10:
Manufacturer:
Engine ID:
EXPERIMENTAL
999 JDPRODT6068T35JL 0
SIENT DATA:
•-rometer: 29.27 "HG
y Bulb Temperature: 85.60 F
•solute Humidity: 62.18 Grains H2O/Lbs Dry Air
USSION RESULTS:
: (INTEGRATED) :
Background, PPM
Exhaust+Bkg, Cms
Net, Gn/Bhp-Hr
1 (BAG»:
Background, PPM
Exhaust*Bkg, Cms
Net, Gms/Bhp-Hr
>X (INTEGRATED):
Background, PPM
Exhaust+Bkg, Gms
Net, Gms/Bhp-Hr
1>2 (BAG)
Background, PPM
Exhaust+Bkg, Gms
Net, Gas/Bhp-Hr
MmCULATE:
Secondary Tare, Gms
Secondary Part, Gms
Primary Tare, Gms
Primary Part, Gms
Total, Gms/Bhp-Hr
JEL CONSUMPTION:
Ubs/Carbon Balance
Lbs/Bhp-Hr
Lbs/Measured
AKE HORSEPOWER-HOUR:
HS
5.15
10.43
.165
2.50
42.66
4.09
.77
62.79
6.121
.048
6564.62
582.2
.155759
.155871
.153303
.159158
.79
3.890
.401
4.182
9.691
CYCLE STATISTICS: MS
SPEED:
Number 1175
Slope .99b83
(Limit: 0.97-1.03)
Y-Intercept 7.727
(Limit: 4-50 RPM)
Std Error 43.932
(Limit: 100 RPM)
R-Square .99297
(Limit: 0.97)
TORQUE:
Number 997
Slope .97595
(Limit: 0.77/0.83-1.03)
Y-Intercept -8.697
(Limit: +-15 Ft-Lbs)
Std Error 6.721%
(Limit: 13% Max Eng Tq)
R-Square .93858
(Limit: 0.85/0.88)
POWER:
Number 997
Slope .96168
(Limit: 0.87/0.89-1.03)
Y-Intercept -2.018
(Limit: +-5 BHP)
Std Error 6.996%
(Limit: 8%)
R-Square .94875
(Limit: 0.91)
WORK:
Actual 9.691
(Limit: -15%-5% Ref Bhp-Hr)
Reference 10.230
% Difference -5.27*
o
3
O
o
(t
H
o
(T\
CO
H
Pi
>fl
•3.
O
o.
(D
o-
o
rt
O
111
999 JDPHOOTbObUTJbJL U
DATK: 01/U6/92 TIMK: I4:bb:i'
-------
HD920053
999 JDPRODT6068T35JL 0
IB HS6N
HEAVY OUTY DIESEL TRANSIENT TEST
DIESEL SUMMARY HEPOKT
DATE: 01/06/92 TIME:
PACE:
Test Number:
Test Date/Time:
HD-920053
3- 4-92 10:42
Manufacturer:
Engine 10:
EXPERIMENTAL
999 JDPROOT6068T3SJL 0
AMBIENT DATA:
Barometer:
Dry Bulb Temperature:
Absolute Humidity:
EMISSION RESULTS:
29.27 "HG
80.60 F
59.91 Grains H2O/Lbs Dry Air
HS
CYCLE STATISTICS:
HS
a
o
HC (INTEGRATED) :
Background, PPM
Exhaust +Bkg, Cms
Net, Gn/Bhp-Hr
CO (BAG) :
Background, PPM
Exhaust *Bkg, Cms
Net, Gns/Bhp-Hr
NOX (INTEGRATED):
Background, PPM
Exhaust+Bkg, Cms
Net, Gms/Bhp-Hr
CO2 (BAG)
Background, PPM
Exhaust+Bkg, Cms
Net, G«s/Bhp-Hr
P ARTICULATE:
Secondary Tare, Cms
Secondary Part, Cms
Primary Tare, Gas
Primary Part, Gas
Total, Gns/Bhp-Hr
FUEL CONSUMPTION:
Lbs/Carbon Balance
Lbs/Bhp-Hr
Lbs/Measured
BRAKE HORSEPOWER-HOUR:
4.24
10.36
.822
2.50
43.44
4.21
.26
62.12
6.185
.044
6600.19
599.7
.155375
.155432
.158355
.163954
.76
3.965
.414
4.182
9.588
SPEED:
Number 1175
Slope .99397
(Limit: 0.97-1.03)
Y-Intercept 9.044
(Limit: t-50 RPM)
Std Error 49.477
(Limit: 100 RPM)
R-Square .99106
(Limit: 0.97)
TORQUE:
Number 997
Slope .9V012
(Limit: 0.77/0.83-1.03)
Y-Intercept -9.618
(Limit: t-15 Ft-Lbs)
Std Error 7.696%
(Limit: 13% Max Eng Tq)
R-Square .92010
(Limit: 0.85/0.88)
POWER:
Number 997
Slope .95735
(Limit: 0.87/0.89-1.03)
Y-Intercept -2.402
(Limit: t-S BHP)
Std Error 7.868%
(Limit: 8%)
R-Square .93551
(Limit: 0.91)
WORK:
Actual 9.588
(Limit: -15%-5% Ref Bhp-Hr)
Reference 10.230
% Difference -6.28%
CD
H
M
D
iQ
I—
3
(I
"i
o ~
°
H-
a
s
o
o.
i—
O
a
a
o
ft
o
n
u
UIJ-f».'UI('. I
i.. «i| i...i.n I r. H
I»AI'K: ii.)/dt/y.' I'lMh.: l-i:')H:!i;)
-------
H0920084
30 NH358-m-92-89V 1
IB CS2D
HEAVY DUTY DIESEL TRANSIENT TEST
DIESEL SUMMARY REPORT
DATE: 04/15/92 TIME: 16:10:31 PAGE:
Test Number:
Test Date/Time:
AMBIENT DATA:
HD-920084
4-15-92 7:45
Manufacturer:
Engine ID:
FORD
30 NH358-1H-92-89V 1
Barometer:
Dry Bulb Temperature:
Absolute Humidity:
EMISSION RESULTS:
HC (INTEGRATED):
Background,PPM
Exhaust«-Bkg, Cms
Net, Gm/Bhp-ltr
CO (BAG):
Background, PPM
Exhaust+Bkg, Cms
Net, Gms/Bhp-Hr
NOX (INTEGRATED):
Background, PPM
Exhaust+Bkg, Cms
Net, Gms/Bhp-Hr
C02 (BAG)
Background, PPM
ExnausttBkg, Cms
Net, Gns/Bhp-Hr
PARTICULATE:
Secondary Tare, Cms
Secondary Part, Cms
Primary Tare, Gras
Primary Part, Cms
Total, Gms/Bhp-Hr
FUEL CONSUMPTION:
Lbs/Carbon Balance
Lbs/Bhp-Hr
Lbs/Measured
BRAKE HORSEPOWER-HOUR:
29.32 "HG
83.00 F
64.90 Grains H2O/Lbs Dry Air
CS
5.25
24.56
2.313
2.36
52.36
5.33
.50
106.23
11.047
.038
6119.96
580.2
.158151
.158563
.156226
.165790
.94
3.758
.405
4.395
9.284
CYCLE STATISTICS: CS
SPEED:
Number 1175
Slope .99984
(Limit: 0.97-1.03)
Y-Intercept 3.483
(Limit: t-50 RPM)
Std Error 17.146
(Limit: 100 RPM)
R-Square .99890
(Limit: 0.97)
TORQUE:
Number 994
Slope 1.00108
(Limit: 0.77/0.83-1.03)
Y-Intercept -4.640
(Limit: t-15 Ft-Lbs)
Std Error 7.810*
(Limit: 13* Max Eng Tq)
R-Square .93776
(Limit: 0.85/0.88)
POWER:
Number 994
Slope 1.00767
(Limit: 0.87/0.89-1.03)
Y-Intercept -1.294
(Limit: +-5 BHP)
Std Error 7.139*
(Limit: 8t)
R-Square .94931
(Limit: 0.91)
WORK:
Actual 9.284
(Limit: -154-5* Ref Bhp-Hr)
Reference 9.603
* Difference -3.32*
o
n
o-
z
o
t
o
(U
D
a
o PJ
I D
o
o "a
H H
a- o
a
w c
ft O
BI rt
h H-
ft O
o
o
ft
H-
o
3
H
I—
H-
3
•O
IIU-9:IO:il HD-'J/OOH4
-------
30 NH3b8-ll7-92-89V 1
IB HS30
ni./.vi ouii UiKliHL TRANS ILNT TEST
DIESEL SUMMARY REPORT
DATE: 04/1b/y2 TIME: 1 fa:16:II PACK
Test Number:
Test Date/Time:
HD-920085
4-15-92 8:26
Manufacturer:
Engine ID:
FORD
30 NH358-117-92-B9V 1
AMBIENT DATA:
Barometer:
Dry Bulb Temperature:
Absolute Humidity:
29.33 "HG
84.70 F
63.45 Grains H2O/Lbs Dry Air
EMISSION RESULTS:
HC (INTEGRATED):
Background,PPM
Exhaust+Bkg, Cms
Nat, Gm/Bhp-Hr
CO (BAG):
Background, PPM
Exhaust+Bkg, Gns
Net, Gms/Bhp-Hr
NOX (INTEGRATED):
Background, PPM
Exhaust+Bkg, Cms
Net, Gms/Bhp-Hr
C02 (BAG)
Background, PPM
Exhaust+Bkg, Cms
Net, Gms/Bhp-Hr
PARTICULATE:
Secondary Tare, Cms
Secondary Part, Cms
Prlnary Tare, Cms
Primary Part, Cms
Total, Gms/Bhp-Hr
FUEL CONSUMPTION:
Lbs/Carbon Balance
Lbs/Bhp-Hr
Lbs/Measured
BRAKE HORSEPOWER-HOUR:
HS
4.50
21.25
2.040
2.58
47.57
4.87
1.00
104.55
10.927
.037
5966.19
577.7
.152628
.152910
.155464
.164773
.92
3.665
.402
4.040
9.116
CYCLE STATISTICS: us
SPEED:
Number 1175
Slope .99938
(Limit: 0.97-1.03)
Y-Intercept 3.063
(Limit: +-50 RPM)
Std Error 17.263
(Limit: 100 RPM)
R-Square .99887
(Limit: 0.97)
TORQUE:
Number 995
Slope .98793
(Limit: 0.77/0.83-1.03)
Y-Intercept -5.238
(Limit: «-15 Ft-Lbs)
Std Error 8.17U
(Limit: 13% Max Eng Tq)
R-Square .93078
(Limit: 0.85/0.88)
POWER:
Number 995
Slope 1.00307
(Limit: 0.87/0.89-1.03)
Y-Intercept -1.690
(Limit: +-5 BHP)
Std Error 7.434*
(Limit: 8%)
R-Square .94496
(Limit: 0.91)
WORK:
Actual 9.116
(Limit: -151-5* Ref Bhp-Hr)
Reference 9.603
» Difference -5.07*
o
n
a
z
a
c
o
D
a.
n
O
a
ft
H-
O
a
H-
3
•Q
HD-920085
IB IIS3D
30 NH358-117-92-89V 1
DATE: 04/l!>/9^ TIME: lt,:H,:l|
-------
HD9200B6
30 NH358-117-92-89V 1
IB HS4D
HEAVY DUTY DIESEL TRANSIENT TEST
DIESEL SUMMARY REPORT
DATE: OI/lb/92 TIME: 1('.:2?:18 I'AclK: (.'
Test Number:
Test Date/Time:
HD-920086
4-15-92 9: 7
Manufacturer:
Engine ID:
FORD
30 NH358-U7-92-89V 1
AMBIENT DATA:
Barometer:
Dry Bulb Temperature:
Absolute Humidity:
EMISSION RESULTS:
HC (INTEGRATED):
Background, PPM
Exhaust+Bkg, Cms
Net, Gm/Bhp-Hr
CO (BAG):
Background, PPM
Exhaust+Bkg, Cms
Net, Gms/Bhp-Hr
NOX (INTEGRATED):
Background, PPM
Exhaust+Bkg, Cms
Net, Gms/Bhp-Hr
CO2 (BAG)
Background, PPM
Exhaust+Bkg, Cms
Net, Gms/Bhp-Hr
PAHTICULATE:
Secondary Tare, Gms
Secondary Part, Gms
Primary Tare, Gms
Primary Part, Gas
Total, Gns/Bhp-Hr
FUEL CONSUMPTION:
Ubs/Carbon Balance
Lbs/Bhp-Hr
Lbs/Measured
BRAKE HORSEPOWER-HOUR:
29.34 "HG
85.10 F
65.34 Grains H2O/Lbs Dry Air
HS
4.80
21.28
2.025
2.15
46.49
4.82
1.50
97.30
10.104
.035
5933.20
578.2
.154874
.155131
.156077
.165592
.94
3.665
.402
4.040
9.111
CYCLE STATISTICS: HS
SPEED:
Number 1175
Slope .99897
(Limit: 0.97-1.03)
Y-Intercept 2.865
(Limit: +-50 RPM)
Std Error 17.804
(Limit: 100 HPM)
R-Square .99880
(Limit: 0.97)
TORQUE:
Number 995
Slope .98983
(Limit: 0.77/0.83-1.03)
Y-Intercept -5.836
(Limit: +-15 Ft-Lbs)
Std Error 8.187%
(Limit: 13% Max Eng Tq)
R-Square .93076
(Limit: 0.85/0.88)
POWER:
Number 995
Slope 1.00450
(Limit: 0.87/O.B9-1.03)
Y-Intercept -1.829
(Limit: +-5 BHP)
Std Error 7.458%
(Limit: 8%)
R-Square .94478
(Limit: 0.91)
WORK:
Actual 9.111
(Limit: -15%-5% Ref Bhp-Hr)
Reference 9.603
% Difference -5.12%
o
n
a
ac
o
(U
p.
as _
D "
"13 T!
^ T
,*s
O
ft
H-
O
30 Nil J!>b-ir/-y2-b9V I
OATK:
TIMK:
-------
HD920090
30 NH3S8-117-92-89V 1
IB CS4D
HEAVY DUTY DIESEL TRANSIENT TEST
DIESEL SUMMARY REW3RT
DATE: 04/17/92 TIME: 07:27:42 PAGE;
Test Number:
Test Date/Time:
HD-920090
4-16-92 12:57
Manufacturer:
Engine ID:
FORD
30 NH358-117-92-89V 1
AMBIENT DATA:
Barometer: 28.86 "HG
Dry Bulb Temperature: 81.70 F
Absolute Humidity: 83.35 Grains H2O/U>s Dry Air
EMISSION RESULTS:
HC (INTEGRATED):
Background,PPM
Exhaust+Bkg, Cms
Net, Gffl/Bhp-Hr
CO (BAG):
Background, PPM
Exhaust+Bkg, Cms
Net, Gms/Bhp-Hr
NOX (INTEGRATED):
Background, PPM
Exhaust+Bkg, Cms
Net, Gms/Bhp-Hr
C02 (BAG)
Background, PPM
Exhaust+Bkg, Gms
Net, Gms/Bhp-Hr
PARTICULATE:
Secondary Tare, Gms
Secondary Part, Cms
Primary Tare, Gms
Primary Part, Gms
Total, Gms/Bhp-Hr
FUEL CONSUMPTION:
Lbs/Carbon Balance
Lbs/Bhp-Hr
Lbs/Measured
BRAKE HORSEPOWER-HOUR:
CS
4.OS
25.83
2.537
2.79
60.31
6.16
1.00
102.90
11.156
.044
6494.98
613.5
.151922
.152280
.151596
.161585
.99
3.967
.429
4.465
9.251
CYCLE STATISTICS: CS
SPEED:
Number 1175
Slope .99970
(Limit: 0.97-1.03)
Y-Intercept 2.871
(Limit: t-50 RPM)
Std Error 17.916
(Limit: 100 RPM)
R-Square .99879
(Limit: 0.97)
TORQUE:
Number 994
Slope .99343
(Limit: 0.77/0.83-1.03)
Y-Intercept -4.452
(Limit: t-15 FL-Lbs)
Std Error 7.910%
(Limit: 13% Max Eng Tq)
R-Square .93534
(Limit: 0.85/0.88)
POWER:
Number 994
Slope .99904
(Limit: 0.87/0.89-1.03)
Y-Intercept -1.186
(Limit: t-5 BHP)
Std Error 7.119%
(Limit: 8%)
R-Square .94875
(Limit: 0.91)
WORK:
Actual 9.251
(Limit: -15%-5% Itef Bhp-Hr)
Reference 9.603
% Difference -3.67%
o
h
&.
z
o
t
a:
o M
I 3
«iaj
H H-
•d 3
n
O "0
i- n
a o
a.
-------
HD920091
30 NH358-117-92-B9V 1
IB HS7D
IIKAVY DUTY IMESEI. TRANSIKNT TKST
DIF.SKL SUMMARY MEIOKT
DATE: 04/17/92 TIME: 0/:2H:01 I'AC.K:
Test Number:
Test Date/Time:
HD-920091
4-16-92 13:3V
Manufacture; ;
Engine 10:
KOKD
30 NH3bB-U7-92-U9V 1
AMBIENT DATA:
Barometer: 28.83 "HG
Dry Bulb Temperature: 83.70 F
Absolute Humidity: 64.81 Grains H20/Lbs Dry Air
EMISSION RESULTS:
HC (INTEGRATED):
Background,PPM
Exhaust+Bkg, Cms
Net, Gm/Bhp-Hr
CO (BAG):
Background, PPM
Exhaust»Bkg, Cms
Net, Gms/Bhp-Hr
NOX (INTEGRATED):
Background, PPM
Exhaust*Bkq, Cms
Net, Gms/Bhp-Hr
C02 (BAG)
Background, PPM
Exhaust*Bkg, Cms
Net, Gms/Bhp-Hr
PARTICULATE:
Secondary Tare, Cms
Secondary Part, Cms
Primary Tare, Cms
Primary Part, Cms
Total, Gms/Bhp-Hr
FUEL CONSUMPTION:
Lbs/Carbon Balance
Lbs/Bhp-Hr
Lbs/Measured
BRAKE HORSEPOWER-HOUR:
HS
5.10
21.96
2.086
2.58
53.54
5.55
1.50
97.02
10.079
.042
6184.04
593.0
.158371
.158563
.151391
.159887
.86
3.759
.413
4.182
9.097
CYCLE STATISTICS: HS
SPEED:
Number 1175
Slope .99853
(Limit: 0.97-1.03)
Y-Intercept 2.979
(Limit: t-50 RPM)
Std Error 17.833
(Limit: 100 RPM)
R-Square .99880
(Limit: 0.97)
TORQUE:
Number 995
Slope .98658
(Limit: 0.77/0.83-1.03)
Y-Intercept -5.713
(Limit: »-15 Ft-Lbs)
StcJ Error 7.981%
(Limit: 13» Max Eng Tq)
R-Square .93357
(Limit: 0.85/0.88)
POWER:
Number 995
Slope .99808
(Limit: 0.87/0.89-1.03)
Y-Intercept -1.700
(Limit: »-5 BHP)
Std Error 7.269%
(Limit: 8%)
R-Square .94675
(Limit: 0.91)
WORK:
Actual 9.097
(Limit: -15%-5% Rut Bhp-llr)
ReTerence 9.601
% Dlftetonco -5.2/H
"I
O
n
a.
•z
9
t
O
a
a
O !
3
l-J-
a
o
ft
H-
o
H-
-------
HD920092
30 NH358-117-92-89V 1
IB HS8D
HEAVY DUTY DIESEL TRANSIENT TEST
DIESEL SUMMARY REPORT
DATE: 04/17/92 TIME: 07:2B:i!b PAGE:
Test Number:
Test Date/Time:
HD-920092
4-16-92 14:16
Manufacturer:
Engine ID:
FORD
30 NH358-117-92-89V 1
AMBIENT DATA:
Barometer: 28.79 "HG
Dry Bulb Temperature: 83.70 F
Absolute Humidity: 62.30 Grains H2O/Ubs Dry Air
EMISSION RESULTS:
HC (INTEGRATED):
Background,PPM
ExhausttBkg, Cms
Net, Gm/Bhp-Hr
CO (BAG):
Background, PPM
Exhaust*Bkg, Cms
Net, Gois/Bhp-Hr
NOX (INTEGRATED):
Background, PPM
Exhaust»Bkg, Cms
Net, Gms/Bhp-Hr
CO2 (BAG)
Background, PPM
Exhaust»Bkg, Cms
Net, Gms/Bhp-Hr
PARTICULATE:
Secondary Tare, Cms
Secondary Part, Gms
Primary Tare, Gms
Primary Part, Gms
Total, Gms/Bhp-Hr
FUEL CONSUMPTION:
Lbs/Carbon Balance
Lbs/Bhp-Hr
Lbs/Measured
BRAKE HORSEPOWER-HOUR:
HS
4.95
21.82
2.097
1.93
51.53
5.45
3.00
95.02
9.565
.033
5868.54
581.4
.159786
.159900
.157921
.167215
.97
3.659
.405
4.111
9.029
CYCLE STATISTICS: HS
SPEED:
Number 1175
Slope .99847
(Limit: 0.97-1.03)
Y-Intercept 2.123
(Limit: t-50 RPM)
Std Error 13.153
(Limit: 100 RPM)
R-Square .99935
(Limit: 0.97)
TORQUE:
Number 995
Slope .98560
(Limit: 0.77/0.83-1.03)
Y-Intercept -6.397
(Limit: 4-15 Ft-Lbs)
Std Error 8.053%
(Limit: 13* Max Eng Tq)
R-Square .93233
(Limit: 0.85/0.88)
POWER:
Number 995
Slope .99600
(Limit: 0.87/0.89-1.03)
Y-Intercept -1.881
(Limit: t-5 BHP)
Std Error 7.536%
(Limit: 8%)
R-Square .94276
(Limit: 0.91)
WORK:
Actual 9.029
(Limit: -15%-5% Ref Uhp-Hr)
Reference 9.603
% Difference -5.98%
z
a
S
0=
s
a
a
o
rf
H-
0
D
III)
H)
.10 Nil IbB-l 1 >-12-8'iV I
PATH: LM/1//1^ TIMK: ()/:/«:/'.. Ill) -J.'OU'V
-------
HU920107
30 NH358-117-92-B9V 1
IB CS2R
HEAVY DUTY DIESEL TRANSIENT TEST
DIESEL SUMMARY UEIOKT
DATE: Oij/0'.j/92 TIMi:: \Q:'/<):2'.> I'AC.i:
Test Number:
Test Date/Time:
HD-920107
4-23-92 14: 3
Manufacturer:
t no ID:
b'OHl)
30 NII.15U-117-92-89V 1
AMBIENT DATA:
Barometer:
Dry Bulb Temperature:
Absolute Humidity:
EMISSION RESULTS:
HC (INTEGRATED):
Background,PPM
ExhausttBkg, Cms
Net, Gro/Bhp-Hr
CO (BAG):
Background, PPM
ExhausttBkg, Cms
Net, Gms/Bhp-Hr
NOX (INTEGRATED):
Background, PPM
ExhausttBkg, Cms
Net, Gms/Bhp-Hr
C02 (BAG)
Background, PPM
ExhausttBkg, Cms
Net, Gms/Bhp-Hr
PARTICULATE:
Secondary Tare, Cms
Secondary Part, Gms
Primary Tare, Gms
Primary Part, Cms
Total, Gms/Bhp-Hr
FUEL CONSUMPTION:
Lbs/Carbon Balance
Lbs/Bhp-Hr
Lbs/Measured
BRAKE HORSEPOWER-HOUR:
29.04 "HC
81.70 F
53.75 Grains H2O/Lbs Dry Air
CS
5.15
41.44
4.451
1.50
48.96
5.46
2.00
73.73
7.665
.035
5274.76
534.2
,157574
.158171
.157601
.168272
1.57
3.270
.378
4.465
8.642
CYCLE STATISTICS: CS
SPEED:
Numbe r 117 !>
Slope 1.00016
(Limit: 0.97-1.03)
Y-Intercept 2.789
(Limit: »-50 RI'M)
Std Error 12.329
(Limit: 100 RPM)
R-Square .9994-1
(Limit: 0.97)
TORQUE:
Number 997
Slope .92466
(Limit: 0.7V0.83-1 .03)
Y-lntercopt .889
(Limit: '-!!> Ft-l.bs)
SLd Error 7.211%
(Limit: 13% Max Eny Tq)
R-Square .93868
(Limit: 0.8b/0.8U)
POWER:
Number 997
Slope .93431
(Limit: 0.87/0.89-1.03)
Y-Intercept -.072
(Limit: *-5 HUP)
Std Error 6.727%
(Limit: 8%)
R-Square .94829
(Limit: 0.91)
WORK:
Actual 8-G42
(Limit: -15%-5* Ret Uhp-Hr)
Heforenco 9.262
% IHffetonco -6.69%
o
n
a.
nj 3
•O H-
- 3
O
I— 50
a a
(t
in t>
ct h
p> a
o
n
ft
t-
o
3
H
H-
H-
3
ifl
III)
II)
10 Nil i'jb- I I /
u/Vli:: u-../.>',/'>.' TIMK: I0:,"i:.",
-------
HD920108
30 NH358-117-92-89V 1
IB HS3R
HEAVY DUTY DILSKL TRANSIENT TEST
DIESEL SUMMARY REPORT
DATE: 05/05/92 TIMK: 10: I';: I!, PACK
Test Number:
Test Date/Time:
HD-920108
4-23-92 14:42
Manufacturer:
Engine ID:
KOKI)
30 NI1358-1 17-92-89V I
AMBIENT DATA:
Barometer: 29.02 "IIG
Dry Bulb Temperature: 83.40 F
Absolute Humidity: 55.65 Grains H2O/U»s Dry Air
EMISSION RESULTS:
HC (INTEGRATED):
Background,PPM
Exhaust+Bkg, Cms
Net, Gm/Bhp-Hr
CO (BAG):
Background, PPM
Exhaust+Bkg, Cms
Net, Gms/Bhp-Hr
NOX (INTEGRATED) :
Background, PPM
Exhaust+Bkg, Cms
Net, Gms/Bhp-Hr
CO2 (BAG)
Background, PPM
Exhaust+Bkg, Cms
Net, Gms/Bhp-Hr
PARTICULATE:
Secondary Tare, Cms
Secondary Part, Cms
Primary Tare, Cms
Primary Part, Cms
Total, Gms/Bhp-Hr
FUEL CONSUMPTION:
Lbs/Carbon Balance
Lbs/Bhp-Hr
Lbs/Measured
BRAKE HORSEPOWER-HOUR:
HS
5.45
31.73
3.375
1.72
40.61
4.55
1.00
61.63
6.712
.035
5197.19
535.8
.159452
.159888
.158480
.167165
1.17
3.186
.376
4.040
8.471
CYCLE STATISTICS: HS
SPEED:
Number 117rj
Slope .99943
(Limit: 0.97-1 .03)
Y-Intercept 2.563
(Limit: »-50 KPM)
Std Error 12.247
(Limit: 100 RPM)
R-Square .99915
(Limit: 0.97)
TORQUE:
Number 997
Slope .90935
(Limit: 0.77/0.83-1.03)
Y-Intercept .38 /
(Limit: »-15 fu-l.bs)
Std Error 6.U734
(Limit: 13* Max £09 Tcj)
R-Square .942 IB
(Limit: 0.85/0.88)
POWER:
Number 99 7
Slope .92891
(Limit: 0.87/0.89-1.03)
Y-Intercopt -.4UO
(Limit: *-5 UUP)
Std Error 6.442*
(Limit: 8%)
R-Square .95185
(Limit: 0.91)
WORK:
Actual 8.471
(Limit: -15*-'j* Hut lihp-llr)
Reference 9.2M
» Dlt tcreiux- -8.51*
o
n
CL
Z
-------
HD920109
30 NH358-117-92-89V 1
IB HS4R
HEAVY DUTY DIESEL TRANSIENT TEST
DIESEL SUMMARY REPORT
DATE: 05/05/9? TIME: 10:39:0:? I'AGK
Test Number:
Test Date/Time:
HD-920109
4-23-92 15:20
Manufacturer:
Engine ID:
KOIU) • '
30 NH358-117-92-89V 1
AMBIENT DATA:
Barometer:
Dry Bulb Temperature:
Absolute Humidity:
EMISSION RESULTS:
HC (INTEGRATED):
Background,PPM
Exhaust+Bkg, Cms
Net, Gm/Bhp-Hr
CO (BAG):
Background, PPM
Exhaust*Bkg, Cms
Net, Gms/Bhp-Hr
NOX (INTEGRATED):
Background, PPM
Exhaust+Bkg, Cms
Net, Gms/Bhp-Hr
CO2 (BAG)
Background, PPM
Exhaust+Bkg, Cms
Net, Gms/Bhp-Hr
PARTICULATE:
Secondary Tare, Cms
Secondary Part, Cms
Primary Tare, Cms
Primary Part, Cms
Total, Gms/Bhp-Hr
FUEL CONSUMPTION:
Lbs/Carbon Balance
Lbs/Bhp-Hr
Lbs/Measured
BRAKE HORSEPOWER-HOUR:
29.01 "IIG
84.50 F
59.11 Grains 1120/UDs Dry Air
HS
5.75
30.67
3.219
1.72
39.79
4.44
.50
58.05
6.452
.029
5198.57
546.7
.152335
.152722
.153151
.161596
1.12
3.255
.383
3.969
8.497
CYCLE STATISTICS: US
SPEED:
Number 1175
Slope .99921
(Limit: 0.97-1.03)
Y-Intercept 2.151
(Limit: «-50 KPM)
Std Error 10.951
(Limit: 100 Rl'M)
H-Square .99956
(Limit: 0.97)
TORQUE:
Number 907
Slope .91148
(Limit: 0.77/0.83-1.03)
Y-Intercept .477
(Limit: »-15 ft-Lbs)
Std Error 6.VJ6%
(Limit: 13% Mdx Eng Tq)
R-Square .94459
(Limit: 0.85/0.88)
POWER:
Number 097
Slope .93353
(Limit: 0.87/0.89-1.03)
Y-Intercept -.524
(Limit: *-5 BHP)
Std Error 6.095%
(Limit: 8%)
R-Square .95709
(Limit: 0.91)
WORK:
Actual 8.497
(Limit: -15%-b» Rot bhp-Ht)
Reference 9.^62
% Difference -8.26%
o
h
o.
z
(I
S
O
PI
«>£
srS
HI) '>.'(> lU'i
IU Nil i'.U-l 1 I -'
UATK: 05/0-J/92 TIMK: I0:)'<:u:' III
-------
HD920110
30 NH358-117-92-89V 1
IB CS3R
HtAVY DUTY DIESEL TRANSIENT TEST
DIESEL SUMMARY RETORT
DATE: 04/24/92 TIME: 14:20:24 PAGE:
Test Number:
Test Date/Time:
HD-920110
4-24-92 1:25
Manufacturer:
Engine ID:
fORD
30 NH358-117-92-89V 1
AMBIENT DATA:
Barometer: 28.92 *HG
Dry Bulb Temperature: 82.70 F
Absolute Humidity: 55.21 Grains H2O/Lbs Dry Air
EMISSION RESULTS:
HC (INTEGRATED):
Background,PPM
Exhaust+Bkg, Gas
Net, Go/Bhp-Hr
CO (BAG):
Background, PPM
Exhaust+Bkg, Gas
Net, Gms/Bhp-Hr
NOX (INTEGRATED):
Background, PPM
Exhaust+Bkg, Gas
Net, GffiS/Bhp-Hr
C02 (BAG)
Background, PPM
Exhaust+Bkg, Cms
Net, Gms/Bhp-Hr
P ARTICULATE:
Secondary Tare, Cms
Secondary Part, Cms
Primary Tare, Cms
Primary Part, Cms
Total, Gms/Bhp-Hr
FUEL CONSUMPTION:
Ubs/Carbon Balance
Lbs/Bhp-Hr
Lba/Measured
BRAKE HORSEPOWER-HOUR:
CS
3.94
44.81
4.934
1.72
51.70
5.76
1.00
67.90
7.280
.031
5190.24
534.0
.154070
.154732
.152295
.165760
1.71
3.272
.380
4.395
8.619
CYCLE STATISTICS: CS
SPEED:
Number 1175
Slope 1.00095
(Limit: 0.97-1.03)
Y-Intercept 2.721
(Limit: +-50 RPM)
Std Error 12.689
(Limit: 100 RPM)
R-Square .99941
(Limit: 0.97)
TORQUE:
Number 997
Slope .92307
(Limit: 0.77/0.83-1.03)
Y-Intercept .410
(Limit: +-15 Ft-Lbs)
Std Error 7.422%
(Limit: 13% Max Eng Tq)
R-Square .93506
(Limit: 0.85/0.88)
POWER:
Number 997
Slope .93199
(Limit: 0.87/0.89-1.03)
Y-Intercept -.140
(Limit: t-5 BHP)
Std Error 6 998%
(Limit: 8%)
R-Square .94403
(Limit: 0.91)
WORK:
Actual 8.619
(Limit: -15%-5% Ref Bhp-Hr)
Reference 9.262
% Difference -6.94%
z
»
*
PI
x a.
o
i M
TJ g
H>fl
•d (-•
- a
a a
ft
(a m
rt h
tu a
h o
rt a
0
rt
O
a
H
£
H-
a
vfl
III)- '.• I'lMI.: h1:/0:?'
-------
HD920111
30 NH358-117-92-89V 1
IB HS5R
HEAVY DUTY DIESEL TRANSIENT TEST
DIESEL SUMMARY REPORT
DATE: 04/24/92 TIME: 14:20:46 PACK:
Test Number:
Test Date/Time:
HD-920111
4-24-92 8:
Manufacturer:
Engine ID:
FORD
30 NH3S8-117-92-89V 1
AMBIENT DATA:
Barometer:
Dry Bulb Temperature:
Absolute Humidity:
EMISSION RESULTS:
HC (INTEGRATED):
Background,PPM
ExhausttBkg, Cms
Net, Gm/Bhp-Hr
CO (BAG):
Background, PPM
Exhaust*Bkg, Cms
Net, Gras/Bhp-Hr
NOX (INTEGRATED):
Background, PPM
Exhaust+Bkg, Cms
Net, Gras/Bhp-Hr
C02 (BAG)
Background, PPM
Exhaust»Bkg, Cms
Net, Gms/Bhp-Hr
PARTICULATE:
Secondary Tare, Cms
Secondary Part, Cms
Primary Tare, Cms
Prlnary Part, Cms
Total, Gms/Bhp-Hr
FUEL CONSUMPTION:
Lbs/Carbon Balance
Lbs/Bhp-Hr
Lbs/Measured
BRAKE HORSEPOWER-HOUR:
28.94 "HG
84.30 F
56.22 Grains H20/Lbs Dry Air
HS
4.24
32.58
3.545
1.72
40.48
4.52
1.50
67.52
7.256
.033
5025.88
518.6
.157922
.158327
.157217
.166319
1.23
3.099
.365
4.040
8.494
CYCLE STATISTICS: HS
SPEED:
Number 1175
Slope 1.00031
(Limit: 0.97-1.03)
Y-Intercept 2.377
(Limit: t-50 RPM)
Std Error 11.135
(Limit: 100 RPM)
R-Square .99955
(Limit: 0.97)
TORQUE:
Number 997
Slope .90929
(Limit: 0.77/0.83-1.03)
Y-Intercept .768
(Limit: »-15 Ft-Lbs)
Std Error 6.701*
(Limit: 13* Max Eng Tq)
R-Square .94488
(Limit: 0.85/0.88)
POWER:
Number 997
Slope .93100
(Limit: 0.87/0.89-1.03)
Y-Intercept -.412
(Limit: »-5 BHP)
Std Error 6.024*
(Limit: 8*)
R-Square .95783
(Limit: 0.91)
WORK:
Actual 8.494
(Limit: -15%-b% Rcf Bhp-Hr)
Reference 9.262
% Difference -8.29*
o
n
o-
z
»
s.
o
X'
o,
m •
Hi
o
ft
a
o
ft
)-•
o
3
H-
3
-------
HD920112
30 NH358-117-92-89V 1
IB IIS6R
HEAVY DUTY DIESEL TRANSIENT TEST
DIESEL SUMMARY REPORT
DATE: 04/24/92 TIME: 14:2I:0/ PACK
Test Number:
Test Date/Time:
HD-920112
4-24-92 8:44
Manufacturer:
Engine ID:
FORD
30 NII35B-117-92-89V 1
AMBIENT DATA:
Barometer:
Dry Bulb Temperature:
Absolute Humidity:
28.94 "HG
84.10 F
57.72 Grains H2O/Lbs Dry Air
EMISSION RESULTS:
HC (INTEGRATED):
Background, PPM
Exhaust *Bkg, Cms
Net, Gm/Bhp-Hr
CO (BAG):
Background, PPM
Exhaust *Bkg, Cms
Net, Gms/Bhp-Hr
NOX (INTEGRATED):
Background, PPM
Exhaust »Bkg, Cms
Net, Gms/Bhp-Hr
CO2 (BAG)
Background, PPM
Exhaust tbkg, Cms
Net, Gms/Bhp-Hr
PART I CU LATE:
Secondary Tare, Cms
Secondary Part, Cms
Primary Tare, Cms
Primary Part, Cms
Total, Gms/Bhp-Hr
FUEL CONSUMPTION:
Lbs /Carbon Balance
Lbs/Bhp-Hr
Lbs/Measured
BRAKE HORSEPOWER-HOUR:
HS
4.24
30.37
3.315
1.72
36.65
4.34
1.50
60.17
6.511
.033
5039.35
524.6
.158405
.158771
.157830
.166567
1.17
3.100
.368
4.040
8.420
CYCLE STATISTICS: IIS
SPEED:
Number 1175
Slope .99968
(Limit: 0.97-1.03)
Y-Intercept 2.451
(Limit: t-50 RPM)
Std Error 12.042
(Limit: 100 RPM)
R-Square .99947
(Limit: 0.97)
TORQUE:
Number 997
Slope .90715
(Limit: 0.77/0.83-1.03)
Y-Intercept -.130
(Limit: +-15 Ft-Lbs)
Std Error 6.861%
(Limit: 13% Max Eng Tq)
R-Square .94212
(Limit: 0.85/0.88)
POWER:
Number 997
Slope .92857
(Limit: 0.87/0.89-1.03)
Y-Intercept -.662
(Limit: t-5 BHP)
Std Error 6.409%
(Limit: 8%)
R-Square .95228
(Limit: 0.91)
WORK:
Actual 8.420
(Limit: -15%-5% Ref Bhp-Hr)
Deference 9.262
\ Difference -9.09%
z
a
£
I-
i»
si?
*5
5
a
o
ft
h"
o
3
IIU-'VOl I
1H
MS6H
10 Nli.')'jB-l 1 /-42-bW 1
DATE: 04/24/92 TIME: 14 : i. I : OH III>-'J:'0 I I.'
-------
E. Raw 8-Mode Steady-State Test Emission Data
Table E.I
John Deere 6068T Engine, Production Injection Timing,
Production Injectors 8-Mode Steady-State #1
Measurement
Date
Speed, rpm
Torque, Ft-lb
Power, Hp
Water In, deg F
Water Out, deg F
Oil, deg F
Inlet Air, deg F
Fuel, deg F
Fuel Return, deg F
Exhaust, deg F
Inlet Restriction in H2O
Exhaust Restriction in Hg
Fuel Flow, gal/hour
Sample Zone Temp, deg F
Filter Face Temp, deg F
Total Tunnel Flow, ft3
Exhaust HC, ppm
Exhaust NO,, ppm
Exhaust CO2, %
Exhaust CO, ppm
Background HC, ppm
Background NO,, ppm
Background CO2, %
Background CO, ppm
Stabilization Time, min
Collection Time, min
Mode
1
8/26
1300
240
58.0
146.9
172.8
185.0
87.1
93.3
122.2
564.6
2.0
0.2
3.0
109.1
104.6
28040
13.79
139.6
0.457
6.95
3.78
0.50
0.037
2.64
5.75
15
2
1991
1300
360
87.1
147.2
177.6
189.3
86.8
90.9
122.2
729.2
2.4
0.4
4.2
121.0
105.6
27790
15.24
217.8
0.710
10.14
4.23
1.50
0.037
3.09
11
15
3
1300
480
116.9
147.2
178.9
198.5
88.2
90.9
122.2
880.5
2.9
0.6
5.7
140.9
114.5
18270
11.83
276.5
0.961
65.24
4.60
2.00
0.039
3.31
8.33
6.5
4
2200
335
138.0
147.2
179.7
202.0
87.5
91.1
122.6
786.7
9.9
2.4
7.2
193.5
124.5
17660
20.54
290.5
1.219
189.9
4.45
2.00
0.041
4.41
6.5
10
5
2200
251
103.9
147.2
177.1
198.5
87.8
93.6
122.6
703.4
8.2
1.8
5.7
166.9
120.0
26990
16.14
175.8
0.959
93.95
4.15
2.00
0.039
3.31
6
15
6
2200
168
68.0
147.2
174.9
193.2
87.8
95.0
122.6
604.5
6.7
1.3
3.9
141.6
111.5
27420
23.97
94.10
0.685
49.79
4.52
1.50
0.037
3.31
5
15
7
2200
34
14.9
146.9
171.9
186.7
86.5
94.3
122.6
393.2
5.3
0.8
1.8
108.4
101.9
28090
36.20
27.52
0.293
30.48
4.75
1.50
0.037
3.31
5
15
8
960
0
0
145.2
168.0
172.3
86.1
93.6
122.2
199.3
1.0
0.1
0.3
80.3
87.1
38310
13.84
10.99
0.064
15.79
4.30
0.50
0.035
3.09
7
10
-------
Table B.2
John Deere 6068T Engine, Production Injection Timing,
Production Injectors 8-Mode Steady-State #2
Measurement
Date
Speed, rpm
Torque, Ft-lb
Power, Hp
Water In, deg F
Water Out, deg F
Oil, deg F
Inlet Air, deg F
Fuel, deg F
Fuel Return, deg F
Exhaust, deg F
Inlet Restriction in H2O
Exhaust Restriction in Hg
Fuel Flow, gal/hour
Sample Zone Temp, deg F
Filter Face Temp, deg F
Exhaust HC, ppm
Exhaust NOX, ppm
Exhaust CO2, %
Exhaust CO, ppm
Background HC, ppm
Background NOX, ppm
Background CO,, %
Background CO, ppm
Stabilization Time, min
Collection Time, min
Mode
1
8/27
1300
240
59.8
146.6
172.3
193
85.8
81.0
121.8
576.3
2.1
0.40
2.7
115.2
104.3
12.16
147.1
0.488
6.29
3.93
0.50
0.039
2.42
3
15
2
1991
1300
360
86.7
147.2
176.2
185.0
86.1
87.1
121.8
735.6
2.35
0.55
4.2
118.0
104.3
15.26
226.3
0.698
11.17
4.52
.050
0.035
1.76
5
15
3
1300
480
119.0
147.6
178.9
192.8
87.0
89.2
121.8
889.3
3.0
0.80
6.0
141.6
117.6
10.02
283.4
0.986
83.68
4.30
0.50
0.039
2.64
5
10
4
2200
335
137.9
147.9
179.3
200.9
87.1
90.9
121.8
788.8
11.8
2.2
7.2
194.5
118.3
17.78
287.4
1.241
194.6
4.52
1.00
0.043
3.97
5
10
5
2200
251
100.9
146.9
176.7
199.3
87.5
92.6
122.2
692.7
8.2
1.8
6.0
170.9
121.7
14.01
166.7
0.955
112.3
4.67
1.00
0.041
2.42
5
15
6
2200
168
67.9
146.9
174.5
193.7
87.5
94.0
122.2
569.9
6.6
1.4
3.9
145.6
116.7
22.99
92.57
0.687
64.31
4.52
1.00
0.037
1.98
5
15
7
2200
34
12.1
146.6
171.9
188.0
87.1
94.0
121.8
395.4
5.4
0.95
1.8
111.1
105.6
33.10
27.99
0.298
27.45
4.38
0.50
0.026
1.54
5
15
8
960
0
0.1
144.6
168.0
173.2
86.4
95.0
122.2
195.4
0.95
0.15
0.4
83.4
89.2
13.10
10.49
0.060
15.30
5.19
0.50
0.022
0.88
5
20
-------
Table E.3
John Deer* 6068T Engine, Retarded Injection Timing,
Production Injectors 8-Mode Steady-State #1
Measurement
Date
Speed, rpm
Torque, Ft-lb
Power, Hp
Water In, deg F
Water Out, deg F
Oil, deg F
Inlet Air, deg F
Fuel, deg F
Fuel Return, deg F
Exhaust, deg F
Inlet Restriction in H2O
Exhaust Restriction in Hg
Fuel Flow, gal/hour
Sample Zone Temp, deg F
Filter Face Temp, deg F
Exhaust HC, ppm
Exhaust NOX, ppm
Exhaust CO2, %
Exhaust CO, ppm
Background HC, ppm
Background NO,, ppm
Background CO,, %
Background CO, ppm
Stabilization Time, min
Collection Time, man
Mode
1
2/19
2200
320.0
134.0
135.9
164.2
210.0
84.1
75.3
117.3
978.3
12.3
2.4
7.2
198.8
110.8
21.16
145.6
0.990
201.6
4.24
3.85
0.050
2.50
5
5
2
1992
2200
241.0
101.0
135.3
162.9
208.1
82.3
78.2
121.4
893.1
10.2
2.1
3.0
186.1
134.9
20.11
92.2
1.025
170.1
4.24
3.85
0.050
2.50
5
5
3
2200
161.5
67.7
. 135.5
161.9
206.4
81.0
81.3
117.3
773.8
8.3
1.6
2.1
163.2
132.3
28.99
55.8
0.802
75.3
4.24
3.85
0.050
2.50
5
5
4
2200
37.0
15.5
134.6
160.2
203.1
81.0
82.0
115.9
580.2
6.1
1.0
1.2
123.1
114.5
248.44
20.2
0.375
147.1
4.24
3.85
0.050
2.50
5
5
5
1300
476.0
117.8
135.6
164.2
199.8
82.3
83.4
115.2
1054
3.6
0.95
3.0
156.6
122.4
13.13
171.1
1.135
82.7
2.97
3.85
0.039
0.63
5
5
6
1300
356.0
88.1
135.3
164.5
205.1
82.0
81.3
113.9
955.1
3.0
0.70
2.4
138.6
118.6
17.56
107.5
0.830
17.7
2.97
3.85
0.039
0.63
5
10
7
1300
260.0
64.4
134.6
162.2
195.5
81.3
81.7
110.4
812.2
2.4
0.55
1.5
121.4
107.7
14.41
78.0
0.608
119.6
2.97
3.85
0.039
0.63
5
15
8
960
5.0
0.9
132.6
156.9
189.8
80.3
80.6
106.3
385.5
1.1
0.0
91.9
97.4
16.81
9.7
0.105
18.3
2.97
3.85
0.039
0.63
5
20
-------
Table B.4
John Deere 6068T Engine, Retarded Injection Timing,
Production Injectors 8-Mode Steady-State #2
Measurement
Date
Speed, rpm
Torque, Ft-lb
Power, Hp
Water In, deg F
Water Out, deg F
Oil, deg F
Inlet Air, deg F
Fuel, deg F
Fuel Return, deg F
Exhaust, deg F
Inlet Restriction in H2O
Exhaust Restriction in Hg
Fuel Flow, gal/hour
Sample Zone Temp, deg F
Filter Face Temp, deg F
Exhaust HC, ppm
Exhaust NOX, ppm
Exhaust CO2, %
Exhaust CO, ppm
Background HC, ppm
Background NOX, ppm
Background CO2, %
Background CO, ppm
Stabilization Time, min
Collection Time, min
Mode
1
2/26
2200
320.5
134.3
135.9
164.9
209.8
82.0
80.0
122.4
956.4
12.1
2.4
7.2
207.8
129.6
22.59
155.0
1.240
239.2
4.69
0.0
0.041
1.88
5
5
2
1992
2200
244.0
102.2
134.6
163.9
211.8
82.0
80.3
122.4
888.0
10.6
2.0
6.0
186.5
134.6
20.49
96.6
0.995
166.4
4.69
0.0
0.041
1.88
5
5
3
2200
163.5
68.5
134.6
162.2
207.8
82.0
81.3
119.0
778.1
8.3
1.5
4.2
162.9
125.2
29.21
56.8
0.795
76.0
4.69
0.0
0.041
1.88
5
5
4
2200
32.0
13.4
133.9
159.5
200.4
80.3
82.0
115.6
604.5
6.2
0.9
2.1
123.4
113.2
251.5
14.9
0.367
141.9
4.69
0.0
0.041
1.88
5
5
5
1300
475.0
117.6
135.9
164.9
201.8
82.7
83.0
116.6
1069
3.6
0.9
6.0
144.9
121.7
14.56
175.3
1.122
80.0
4.69
0.0
0.041
1.88
5
5
6
1300
352.0
87.1
134.3
164.2
206.4
82.0
81.0
116.6
972.0
3.0
0.6
4.2
140.9
119.3
18.08
108.8
0.827
15.7
4.69
0.0
0.041
1.88
5
10
7
1300
243.5
60.3
133.9
162.0
197.5
82.0
81.3
111.8
771.2
2.4
0.5
2.7
125.5
114.2
16.21
66.8
0.569
10.1
4.69
0.0
0.041
1.88
5
10
8
960
0.0
0.0
132.3
157.2
188.1
81.3
81.3
108.7
398.1
1.1
0.1
96.0
100.8
17.41
5.9
0.103
13.8
4.69
0.0
0.041
1.88
5
20
-------
Table E.5
John Deere 6068T Engine, Retarded Injection Timing,
Modified Injectors 8-Mode Steady-State #1
Measurement
Date
Speed, rpm
Torque, Ft-lb
Power, Hp
Water In, deg F
Water Out, deg F
Oil, deg F
Inlet Air, deg F
Fuel, deg F
Fuel Return, deg F
Exhaust, deg F
Inlet Restriction in H20
Exhaust Restriction in Hg
Fuel Flow, gal/hour
Sample Zone Temp, deg F
Filter Face Temp, deg F
Exhaust HC, ppm
Exhaust NOX, ppm
Exhaust CO2, %
Exhaust CO, ppm
Background HC, ppm
Background NOX, ppm
Background COj, %
Background CO, ppm
Stabilization Time, min
Collection Time, min
Mode
1
3/9
2200
331.5
138.9
135.9
165.2
213.8
84.4
82.0
124.8
957.2
12.4
2.4
7.2
210.1
120.4
12.16
179.3
1.015
159.6
3.87
0.26
0.037
0.58
5
5
2
1992
2200
250.2
104.8
134.9
164.9
212.4
82.3
83.7
122.8
879.2
10.2
1.8
5.7
186.1
116.6
11.19
110.3
0.870
106.9
3.87
0.26
0.037
0.58
5
5
3
2200
165.5
69.3
134.6
163.2
208.4
83.4
84.7
119.3
773.4
8.0
1.3
3.9
161.9
112.8
16.66
62.8
0.734
51.3
3.87
0.26
0.037
0.58
5
5
4
2200
37.0
15.5
133.6
162.2
204.1
81.7
84.7
117.6
560.1
6.0
0.8
1.8
122.1
105.3
280.2
17.1
0.348
144.9
3.87
0.26
0.037
0.58
5
5
5
1300
485.0
120.0
135.3
167.2
206.1
83.4
85.4
118.6
1083
3.5
0.8
5.7
154.6
118.6
8.79
194.7
1.099
101.3
3.87
0.26
0.037
0.58
5
5
6
1300
364.0
90.1
134.6
163.9
205.4
81.7
83.0
116.6
957.2
2.8
0.0
4.2
136.9
115.6
11.41
132.3
0.760
15.2
3.87
0.26
0.037
0.58
5
10
7
1300
245.0
60.6
133.9
133.6
197.8
82.7
83.0
112.1
758.1
2.4
0.0
2.7
117.6
108.0
12.23
79.0
0.536
7.7
3.87
0.26
0.037
0.58
5
15
8
960
3.0
0.5
132.6
153.6
185.5
81.0
82.3
108.0
344.0
1.1
0.0
85.4
92.6
15.68
4.9
0.091
13.7
3.87
0.26
0.037
0.58
5
20
-------
Table B.6
John Deere 6068T Engine, Retarded Injection Timing,
Modified Injectors 8-Mode Steady-State #2
Measurement
Date
Speed, rpm
Torque, Ft-lb
Power, Hp
Water In, deg F
Water Out, deg F
Oil, deg F
Inlet Air, deg F
Fuel, deg F
Fuel Return, deg F
Exhaust, deg F
Inlet Restriction in H2O
Exhaust Restriction in Hg
Fuel Flow, gal/hour
Sample Zone Temp, deg F
Filter Face Temp, deg F
Exhaust HC, ppm
Exhaust NO,, ppm
Exhaust CO2, %
Exhaust CO, ppm
Background HC, ppm
Background NOX, ppm
Background COj, %
Background CO, ppm
Stabilization Time, min
Collection Time, min
Mode
1
3/11
2200
331.5
138.9
137.3
165.9
205.8
84.1
70.4
113.9
936.1
12.5
2.1
7.2
191.8
105.0
11.78
185.5
1.222
186.9
2.83
0.77
0.039
0.29
5
5
2
1992
2200
251.0
105.1
135.9
163.5
211.1
83.0
73.6
116.3
873.7
10.3
1.9
5.7
187.1
116.3
10.74
112.5
0.939
118.9
2.83
0.77
0.039
0.29
5
5
3
2200
166.0
69.5
135.3
163.5
208.8
82.7
76.4
115.6
778.1
8.3
1.7
4.2
161.9
114.9
16.21
65.5
0.751
53.3
2.83
0.77
0.039
0.29
5
5
4
2200
34.0
14.2
134.6
161.2
203.1
81.7
79.2
115.2
557.6
6.1
0.8
2.1
122.4
106.0
228.0
17.7
0.350
125.3
2.83
0.77
0.039
0.29
5
5
5
1300
485.0
120.1
135.9
154.2
203.4
84.1
81.3
115.9
1074
3.5
0.8
5.7
151.6
111.1
9.02
199.7
1.097
91.0
2.83
0.77
0.039
0.29
5
5
6
1300
365.1
90.4
135.6
154.2
202.8
82.7
80.0
113.9
937.4
2.8
0.6
4.2
136.9
108.4
10.14
130.5
0.767
15.5
2.83
0.77
0.039
0.29
5
10
7
1300
242.0
59.9
135.3
154.2
193.1
82.0
80.0
108.7
724.5
2.4
0.5
2.7
113.5
99.8
10.14
79.8
0.538
7.7
2.83
0.77
0.039
0.29
5
15
8
960
3.0
0.6
132.9
157.2
191.1
82.3
80.0
106.7
371.9
1.1
0.1
93.6
94.3
12.61
8.2
0.097
12.0
2.83
0.77
0.039
0.29
5
20
-------
Table 2.7
Ford New Holland Engine, Production Injection Timing
8-Mode Steady-State #1
Measurement
Date
Speed, rpm
Torque, Ft-lb
Power, Hp
Water In, deg F
Water Out, deg F
Oil, deg F
Inlet Air, deg F
Fuel, deg F
Fuel Return, deg F
Exhaust, deg F
Inlet Restriction in H2O
Exhaust Restriction in Hg
Fuel Flow, gal/hour
Sample Zone Temp, deg F
Filter Face Temp, deg F
Exhaust HC, ppm
Exhaust NOX, ppm
Exhaust CO2, %
Exhaust CO, ppm
Background HC, ppm
Background NOX, ppm
Background CO,, %
Background CO, ppm
Stabilization Time, min
Collection Time, min
Mode
1
4/3
2100
322.0
128.8
137.9
167.2
197.2
83.7
61.8
82.0
1273
12.2
4.4
7.2
182.2
118.0
8.13
200.2
1.048
359.1
3.59
0.26
0.035
0.0
5
5
2
1992
2100
242.7
97.0
136.9
163.9
199.8
83.0
60.8
82.3
997.0
12.1
3.8
4.8
164.9
120.0
34.19
155.0
0.884
59.9
3.59
0.26
0.035
0.0
5
5
3
2100
164.0
65.6
136.9
161.5
191.9
82.3
60.8
81.7
772.1
12.2
3.2
3.6
146.2
114.5
46.00
100.6
0.643
27.9
3.59
0.26
0.035
0.0
5
10
4
2100
34.5
13.8
136.3
158.2
182.3
82.7
65.7
79.6
504.0
12.7
2.4
1.8
122.1
107.7
66.53
28.1
0.215
35.6
3.59
0.26
0.035
0.0
5
5
5
1260
380.0
91.2
137.9
165.2
174.9
85.4
66.1
78.2
1185
4.7
2.2
4.8
123.4
109.1
13.79
127.6
1.311
298.4
3.59
0.26
0.035
0.0
5
5
6
1260
287.9
69.1
136.3
161.9
174.9
85.1
67.5
78.5
919.1
4.9
1.4
3.3
124.1
108.0
27.63
117.9
0.601
23.4
3.59
0.26
0.035
0.0
5
10
7
1260
192.4
46.2
136.3
159.9
167.1
84.1
68.9
75.7
689.7
5.0
1.1
2.1
112.1
103.6
31.28
74.8
0.412
15.1
3.59
0.26
0.035
0.0
5
10
8
875
4.5
0.8
138.9
158.2
150.1
85.1
68.9
77.8
290.5
2.55
0.4
0.3
90.9
92.6
19.32
11.0
0.105
13.2
3.59
0.26
0.035
0.0
5
20
-------
Table E.8
Ford New Holland Engine, Production Injection Timing
8-Mode Steady-State #2
Measurement
Date
Speed, rpm
Torque, Ft-lb
Power, Hp
Water In, deg F
Water Out, deg F
Oil, deg F
Inlet Air, deg F
Fuel, deg F
Fuel Return, deg F
Exhaust, deg F
Inlet Restriction in H2O
Exhaust Restriction in Hg
Fuel Flow, gal/hour
Sample Zone Temp, deg F
Filter Face Temp, deg F
Exhaust HC, ppm
Exhaust NOX, ppm
Exhaust CO2, %
Exhaust CO, ppm
Background HC, ppm
Background NOX, ppm
Background CO2, %
Background CO, ppm
Stabilization Time, min
Collection Time, min
Mode
1
4/9
2100
326.0
130.4
138.3
168.9
216.4
84.1
68.9
85.1
1276
12.2
4.4
7.2
187.8
109.4
9.16
201.2
0.811
268.3
4.76
2.06
0.037
2.03
5
5
2
1992
2100
245.6
98.2
137.6
164.9
216.1
82.7
68.9
86.5
985.5
12.5
3.8
5.1
162.2
126.2
32.47
152.6
0.762
49.3
4.76
2.06
0.037
2.03
5
5
3
2100
163.5
65.4
137.3
162.5
211.8
81.7
68.9
87.5
768.7
12.9
3.4
3.6
138.6
118.3
45.25
122.9
0.649
24.7
4.76
2.06
0.037
2.03
5
10
4
2097
34.0
13.6
137.3
159.9
197.1
82.0
68.9
88.9
476.9
13.2
2.5
1.8
112.1
106.3
63.43
25.5
0.225
37.6
4.76
2.06
0.037
2.03
5
5
5
1260
385.5
92.5
137.9
165.5
190.1
85.4
68.9
89.9
1188
4.8
2.1
4.8
132.9
111.5
13.20
128.6
0.848
431.0
4.76
2.06
0.037
2.03
5
5
6
1260
290.5
69.7
137.6
162.2
189.0
84.1
70.4
88.5
901.9
4.8
1.4
3.3
119.0
109.1
26.36
116.5
0.587
17.7
4.76
2.06
0.037
2.03
5
10
7
1260
193.5
46.4
137.6
159.9
180.2
83.4
70.7
87.1
674.3
5.0
1.2
2.1
106.7
102.9
30.98
72.8
0.433
17.3
4.76
2.06
0.037
2.03
5
10
8
890
3.0
0.5
136.3
136.3
164.9
84.7
70.4
88.2
281.1
2.6
0.4
0.3
83.7
91.9
22.21
9.7
0.096
14.4
4.76
2.06
0.037
2.03
5
20
-------
Table B.9
Ford New Holland Engine, Retarded Injection Timing
8-Mode Steady-State #1
Measurement
Date
Speed, rpm
Torque, Ft-lb
Power, Hp
Water In, deg F
Water Out, deg F
Oil, deg F
Inlet Air, deg F
Fuel, deg F
Fuel Return, deg F
Exhaust, deg F
Inlet Restriction in H20
Exhaust Restriction in Hg
Fuel Flow, gal/hour
Sample Zone Temp, deg F
Filter Face Temp, deg F
Exhaust HC, ppm
Exhaust NOX, ppm
Exhaust COZ, %
Exhaust CO, ppm
Background HC, ppm
Background NOX, ppm
Background CO2, %
Background CO, ppm
Stabilization Time, min
Collection Time, min
Mode
1
4/20
2100
328.0
131.2
137.9
176.5
209.4
88.5
66.4
83.7 .
1357
4.9
12.2
7.5
195.5
120.0
7.76
128.3
1.068
270.9
3.73
0.51
0.040
1.25
5
5
2
1992
2100
250.0
100.0
137.6
172.7
206.4
87.5
67.2
83.4
1041
4.1
12.4
5.1
165.5
132.6
34.57
101.8
0.683
57.9
3.73
0.51
0.040
1.25
5
5
3
2100
164.0
65.6
137.3
169.9
198.5
86.8
67.5
84.1
807.1
3.6
12.8
3.6
143.9
121.1
50.56
69.3
0.699
40.2
3.73
0.51
0.040
1.25
5
10
4
2100
41.0
16.4
136.6
166.5
188.5
87.1
67.9
83.7
532.5
2.8
13.1
1.8
114.1
109.1
300.1
15.6
0.238
158.9
3.73
0.51
0.040
1.25
5
5
5
1260
386.0
92.6
137.9
172.5
176.5
89.2
67.9
82.7
1240
2.0
4.8
4.8
131.9
112.8
11.88
95.2
0.827
303.7
3.73
0.51
0.040
1.25
5
5
6
1260
292.0
70.1
137.6
169.9
176.2
88.2
68.6
82.7
964.0
1.7
4.8
3.3
120.0
109.7
27.63
76.3
0.601
17.7
3.73
0.51
0.040
1.25
5
10
7
1260
198.0
47.5
137.3
166.5
165.5
87.5
69.6
79.6
707.3
1.2
5.0
4.5
107.3
104.3
33.97
52.8
0.448
22.7
3.73
0.51
0.040
1.25
5
10
8
890
5.5
0.9
135.9
162.5
149.9
89.2
68.9
79.2
275.8
0.4
2.6
83.0
93.3
32.47
10.8
0.096
20.8
3.73
0.51
0.040
1.25
5 '
20
-------
Table E.10
Ford New Holland Engine, Retarded Injection Timing
8-Mode Steady-State #2
Measurement
Date
Speed, rpm
Torque, Ft-lb
Power, Hp
Water In, deg F
Water Out, deg F
Oil, deg F
Inlet Air, deg F
Fuel, deg F
Fuel Return, deg F
Exhaust, deg F
Inlet Restriction in H2O
Exhaust Restriction in Hg
Fuel Flow, gal/hour
Sample Zone Temp, deg F
Filter Face Temp, deg F
Exhaust HC, ppm
Exhaust NOIf ppm
Exhaust CO2, %
Exhaust CO, ppm
Background HC, ppm
Background NO^, ppm
Background CO2, %
Background CO, ppm
Stabilization Time, min
Collection Time, min
Mode
1
4/21
2100
328.5
131.4
137.9
176.8
209.8
89.9
68.6
85.8
1366
5.0
12.1
7.2
196.8
117.3
9.38
123.6
1.068
287.1
3.22
0.0
0.033
1.25
5
5
2
1992
2100
249.0
99.6
136.9
172.2
205.8
88.5
68.9
84.7
1045
4.0
12.5
5.1
167.5
133.9
35.61
103.1
0.788
63.9
3.22
0.0
0.033
1.25
5
5
3
2100
165.6
66.2
136.9
169.5
196.1
87.1
68.9
84.1
797.4
3.4
12.8
3.6
144.2
111.8
48.50
68.8
0.495
46.7
3.22
0.0
0.033
1.25
5
5
4
2100
37.6
15.0
136.3
166.5
188.5
87.1
68.9
84.7
524.2
2.7
13.0
1.8
115.6
108.0
300.1
12.8
0.314
163.4
3.22
0.0
0.033
1.25
5
5
5
1260
386.0
92.6
138.6
172.5
175.5
89.5
68.9
84.1
1230
2.1
4.8
5.1
133.6
106.3
13.42
89.2
0.813
306.3
3.22
0.0
0.033
1.25
5
5
6
1260
290.2
69.6
136.6
168.9
176.8
90.2
69.3
86.1
963.1
1.6
4.8
3.3
122.1
106.3
26.74
70.0
0.542
20.2
3.22
0.0
0.033
1.25
5
5
7
1260
194.0
46.5
136.9
166.5
169.5
89.2
70.0
85.1
716.7
1.3
5.0
2.1
109.1
102.2
32.10
47.0
0.336
24.0
3.22
0.0
0.033
1.25
5
5
8
890
5.0
0.8
136.3
162.9
148.6
89.5
69.6
85.7
273.5
0.4
2.6
0.3
82.7
89.9
28.00
3.3
0.098
20.8
3.22
0.0
0.033
1.25
5
5
------- |