UNITED STATES

                          LPPSD

           TECHNICAL INFORMATION EXCHANGE

                         DOCUMENT

                          NO.  2
               A Summary  Report  of  the;

       Automotive Power Systems Contractors

                 Coordination Meeting

                  Ann Arbor,  Michigan,

                    May 13-16, 1974
                           - NOTICE-
             ITvts report was prepared as an account of work
             sponsored by the United States Government. Neither
             the  United States nor  ihz  United States Enurgy
             Research and Development Adrninislration, nor any of
             their  emptwyws,  nor  any . of  (heir  contractors,
             subcontractors, or  their, employees,  nukes  any
             warranty, opres*  or implied, or asMjnres any
             liability «r responMbitity for the accuracy,
             pr usefulness of any information, apparatus. pKnluct or
             process disclosed, or ieprr\ents that its use uould not
             infnngc priiatcly ottTicd .rights.
ALTERNATIVE  AUTOMOTIVE POWER  SYSTEMS  DIVISION

     U.  S.  ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

-------
                                FOREWORD






                           ABOUT THE MEETING









In an effort  to  stimulate  and promote the maximum rate of technical




progress toward  the country's clean air objectives, the Alternative




Automotive Power Systems Division holds periodic coordination and




progress meetings with  all of its contractors, staff, consultants,




prospective contractors, and selected guests.  The meetings focus




attention on  the status of the programs £.nd provides an opportunity




for Interaction  between the participants on problem areas of mutual




interest.









This TSport summarizes  the presentations and discussions at the




seventh such  tweeting  held  on May 13-16, 1974, in Ann Arbor, Michigan.




Docoiaentation such  as this is believed to be both an effective and




timely means  of  providing  a full and up-to-date accounting of the




AAPS Program  progress in the U. S.









This document includes:




               The key issues under consideration in the




               AAPS  Division






               Gas Turbine  Engine Program

-------

-------
              Rankine Cycle Engine Programs




              Diesel Engine Study, Alternative Fuel Investigations,




              Combustion Studies, Electric Vehicle Impact Study,




              and Hydrogen Storage Investigation;:.








Each of these presentations is summarized along with the pertinent




questions, comments and items of discussion.  Wherever possible




specific data, principle conclusions, and key illustrations are




included.








Additional supplementary material contained in the appendices




include explanatory notes on the AAPS Division in the EPA organization




(Appendix A); a list of attendees and representatives (Appendix B);




a review of the background and evolution of the new EPA Highway




Test Cycle (Appendix C); a final report on the health hazards of




nickel oxide regenerator seal materials  (Appendix D) and a biblio-




graphy of AAPSD reports released through May 1974 (Appendix E).
                                   ii

-------
                               TABLE OF CONTENTS

                                                                          Page
TITLE PAGE
FOREWORD.	    i
TABLE OF CONTENTS	  iii
I.     SPECIAL SESSION  ON  KEY  ISSUES  UNDER CONSIDERATION BY
       EPA, AAPS DIVISION,  TO  ACHIEVE A  BALANCED  PROGRAM, BY
       JOHN J. BROGAN,  DIVISION  DIRECTOR	    1
       A.  Objective of Special  Session	    1
       B.  Orientation  and Background of AAPS  Division Within
           the Environmental Protection  Agency	    1
       C.  The Purpose,  Approach and  Evolution of AAPS Program	    3
       D.  Key Issues Include:   Fuel  Economy,  Emissions, Cost
           and Critical Materials	    4
       E.  Key Issues To Be Incorporated in Balanced AAPS Program	    5
       F.  Preliminary  Conclusions, Directions and  Criteria for
           New Programs	   20
II.    SUMMARY OF CURRENT STATUS,  PLANS, AND ACCOMPLISHMENTS ON AAPS
       PROGRAMS, BY GEORGE M.  THUR,  CHIEF, AAPS  DEVELOPMENT BRANCH	   30
       A.  Gas Turbines	   30
       B.  Rankine  Engines	   31
       C.  Alternative Fuels  Program	   33
       D.  Electric Vehicles	   33
       E.  Overall  AAPS  Status and Accomplishments	   34

III.   GAS TURBINE  ENGINE PROGRAM	   38
       A.  Baseline Engine Project - Chrysler	   38
       B.  Baseline Engine Project Support - NASA,  Lewis  Research
           Center	   79
       C.  Baseline Vehicle Tests  to Date - EPA	   90
       D.  Low Cost Integrated Control  for Baseline Gas  Turbine
           Program  - AiResearch	   91
                                     -iii-

-------
                                                                          Page
       E.   Low Cost Turbine Wheel Manufacturing Process -
           Pratt & Whitney Aircraft Corp	  104
       F.   Gas Turbine Low Emission Combustion System - Solar	  124
       G.   Oxide Recuperator Technology P.rogram - Owens-Illinois.	  130
       H.   Ceramic Regenerator Reliability - Ford Motor Company
           (Guest Presentation)	  136
       I.   Ceramics for Turbines - U.S. Army Materials and Mechanics
           Research Center (Guest Presentation)	  139
       J.   Continuously Variable Transmission Program - EPA	  154
       K.   Potential Health Hazard of Nickel Compound Emissions from
           Automotive Gas Turbine Engines Using Nickel Oxide Base
           Regenerator Seals - EPA (Summary and Conclusions)	  159
       L.   Ceramic Materials Development - Advanced Materials
           Engineering, Ltd., England (Guest Presentation)	  162
       M.   General Purpose Programmable Analog Control - Ultra
           Electronics, Inc., England (Guest Presentation)	  165
IV.     RANKINE ENGINE PROGRAMS	  170
       A.  Overview of Trends, Objectives, and Status - EPA	  170
       B.  Water Base Reciprocating System - Scientific Energy
           Sys terns, Inc	  173
       C.  Organic Reciprocating Engine - Thermo Electron Corp	  189
       D.  California Clean Car Program - California State Assembly
           (Guest Presentation)	  208
       E.  Advanced Boiler Studies - Carnegie Mellon University	  216

V.     DIESEL ENGINES, ALTERNATIVE FUELS, ELECTRIC VEHICLES, AND NEW
       EPA FUEL ECONOMY TEST CYCLE	  222
       A.  Diesel Engine Study - Ricardo, Ltd., England	  222
       B.  Alternate Fuels - Institute of Gas Technology	  232
       C.  Alternate Fuels - Esso Research and Engineering	  239
       D.  Combustion Studies - Bureau of Mines (Guest  Presentation)....  251
       E.  Fundamental Combustion Research - National Science
           Foundation (Guest Presentation)	  253
       F.  Storage of Hydrogen by Hydrides - Brookhaven National
           Laboratory	  253
                                      -iv-

-------
                                                                          Page


       G.  Gasoline-Hydrogen Fuel Blends - Jet Propulsion Laboratory....  259
       H.  Electric Vehicle Impact Study for Los Angeles - General
           Research Corporation	  271
       I.  New EPA Highway Fuel Economy Test Cycle - EPA, Emission
           Control Technology Division, Procedures Development Branch...  292
APPENDIX A - Orientation of Alternative Automotive Power Systems
             Division in EPA Organization

APPENDIX B - List of Attendees and Representatives

APPENDIX C - Development of the  EPA Composite Highway Driving Cycle

APPENDIX D - The Potential Health Hazard of Nickel Compound Emissions
             from Automotive Gas Turbine Engines Using Nickel Oxide
             Base Regenerator Seals (Background and Documentation)

APPENDIX E - Alternative Automotive Power Systems Division - Annual,
             Final, and Summary  Reports - May, 1974
                                       -v-

-------
I.   SPECIAL SESSION ON KEY  ISSUES UNDER CONSIDERATION BY EPA. AAFS DIVISION,
     TO ACHIEVE A BALANCED PROGRAM. BY JOHN J. BROGAN. DIVISION DIRECTOR

A.   Objective of Special Session
The Alternative Automotive Power Systems Division is in the process of planning
an expanded program of automotive research and technology development.  This
program is an integral part  of  the $10 billion, 5-year program of energy
related Research & Development  announced in January this year.

By outlining the background  and current th?\:ghts on the general direction
which this program might take,  it is hoped to stimulate subsequent reactions,
comments, and suggestions from  the broad sector of the technical community
represented at this conference.

B.   Orientation and Background of AAPS  Division Within the Environmental
     Protection Agency
The AAPS Division reports to the Office  of Mobile Source Air Pollution Control,
under Eric Stork, Deputy Assistant Administrator.  He in turn reports to the
EPA Administrator, Russell Train, through  Roger Strelow, Assistant Administrator
for Air and Waste Management.   (A somewhat more detailed description of the
organization is shown  in Appendix A.)

The AAPS Division is comprised  of  two branches, Power Systems Development branch,
under George Thur, and Alternative Systems Analysis Branch, under Graham Hagey
 (Fig. 1).

The Power Systems Development  Branch  focuses  on development of component and
system hardware, such  as:   the  work on  turbo  compounding,  transmissions and
the Rankine and Brayton cycle  engine  development  projects.  The Power Systems
Analysis Branch focuses  on assessment and  evaluation  of available engine and
fuel technologies, and assessment of  the impacts  associated with the  use of
alternative fuels and  battery  powered electric cars.  One  branch develops; the
other branch studies.
                                        -1-

-------

-------
I
NJ
                                   Fig. 1   Alternative Automotive Power Systems Division

-------
The need for an alternative power system development program was identified in
late 1969.  The Office of Science and Technology, then headed by Dr. Lee
DuBridge, expressed concern to the President about:
          • the automobile's significant contribution to our nation's deteri-
            orating ambient air quality
          • the exhaust emissions standards required in future years - through
            the end of this century - might have to be so stringent that the
            conventional engine might not be capable of being clean enough
          • the tech"ologies needed to produce alternative power systems should
            at least be available to the nation  if needed
          • the auto industry had no serious alternative engine development
            programs underway and none were planned.

As a result, a Federal program was. recommended to serve as a stimulus to
industry and to provide this base of technology.  The President announced the
progran in his Message on The Environment early  in 1970.  The program is
managed by the Environmental Protection Agency AAPS  Division in Ann Arbor,
Michigan.

C.   The Purpose, Approach and Evolution of AAPS Program
The purpose of the program is to evaluate powerplant alternatives to the con-
ventional engine.  In some cases the evaluations did not require development
of new hardware systems; however, for some powerplants development has been
necessary.  The program was focused initially on power systems  that offered
the potential of being inherently clean compared to the conventional engine.
In 1972 the program scope was broadened to include studies of alternative
fuels and battery powered systems; energy efficiency was elevated to share
equal importance with low emissions iu the hardware development program.  The
Rankine cycle and gas turbine systems are the two technologies  currently  in
various hardware stages in this program.

Until a year ago the AAPS Division assisted in funding the Army program on stra-
tified charge engine development.  The AAPS Division charter permits development
                                       -3-

-------
to the end of the Advanced Development phase where engineering prototypes can
be tested in motor vehicles.  The Army program, having different constraints,
is carrying the stratified charge engine into the next phase, Engineering
Development In which soft tooling is to be provided.

On December 1, 1973 the Chairman of the Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) pre-
sented the President with a 5-year, $10 billion-total, energy R&D package which
included a new program that emphasized automotive energy  R&D.  The EPA is
responsible for a portion of  thij new program.  Basically the ongoing AAPS
, - . -.  :-•- - •* -1 .nrti -
program and the new energy oriented program overlap by about one year starting
in Fiscal Year 1975.  The new program basically broadens  the scope of the on-
going program in that additional typos of power systems will be developed
through to demonstration of engineering prototypes  in motor vehicles.  This
expanded scope may permit a next generation of hardware development beyond
that originally contemplated  -  for the gas turbine, for example.

D.   Key Issues  Include:  Fuel  Economy, Emissions,  Cost and Critical Materials
The automobile is deeply entwined in modern economy and life style.  In the
U.S. it is relied upon more than any other mode of  transportation.  The follow-
ing data from 1971 and 1972 attempt to place  the automobile in its nationwide
perspective.  Automobiles represent:      	                   '          	
          • 82% of total U.S. registered automotive ground transportation
            vehicles
          a 71% of total U.S. automotive transport  fuel use
          • 20.5% of  total  U.S. energy use  (Includes fuel consumed by auto-
            mobiles and  the energy used in manufacturing  them.)
          • 30.1% of  total  U.S. petroleum use
          • 10% of total U.S. steel and aluminum use
          • 5 to 40%  of  total U.S. use of critical  materials
          • 14% of total U.S. imports  (percent of dollar  value of  imported
            automotive products - new cars, engines, fuel)
          * 27.5% of  total  U.S. pollution toxicity

-------
It is clear that  the automobile  is  a major factor which impacts on national
issues of:  energy, pollution, natural  resources  and  on the  economy of  the
country,  the drop in Gross  National Product  in the first  quarter of  1974
was in large measure due  to  the  drop in sales and manufacture of automobiles
and components.   The nation's balance of payments deficits will be relatively
large now that  imported petroleum has tripled in price  - another illustration
of the importance of the  automobile to  the national economy.

The issues facing the automobile industry have traditionally included achieve-
ment of low initial cost.  This  remains an important  issue.  Since the  1960's
emissions have  become another  important issue and, more recently, fuel  economy
has been recognized as  far more  important than it had been in the past.  These
issues and others have  influenced engine and  vehicle  systems design and will
continue to do  so because, once  exposed, they never disappear completely.

Because a program is being planned  that must  somehow  relate  to these past and
current issues  it is also important to  anticipate other potential issues that
have not yet surfaced.  Dwindling domestic natural resources is expected to
be the next critical issue.

Consideration of  these  various  issues emphasizes  the  need  for a balanced
program both in its technical content and its timing  (Fig. 2).

E.   Key Issues To Be Incorporated  in Balanced AAPS Progrra
The automobile  caused pollution  issue has been faced  by the  industry, and sig-
nificant reductions in  CO, unburned hydrocarbons, and NOx  have been achieved;
however, it should be remembered that in any  Federally  sponsored program on
new engines and/or fuels  that the same  or even more stringent standards must
be net if the gains already  made on the emissions issue are  to be retained.  If
impact on the fuel or energy problem is achieved  by exceeding the emission stan-
dards, then a step backward  would have  been taken.

Consider the automobile and  its  relationship  to petroleum  consumption.  Figure 3
shows this for  four different scenarios.   Taking  the  known domestic petroleum
reserves and assuming that through  intensive  exploration etc. that these
                '-.^aaiJV^
               ^^                                  —^-^^^'''^----^•-•'••^-"-^-^

-------
                        ENERGY
 NATURAL
RESOURCES
POLLUTION
                  BALANCE OF PAYMENTS
             Fig. 2   A Balanced AAPS Program
                          -6-

-------

                                   1 - CURRENT (1973) BASELINE
                                   2 - BUSINESS AS USUAL IN RESPONSE TO MARKET AND GOVERNMENT
                                       REGULATORY PRESSURES
                                   3 - CURRENT LEVELS OF GOVERNMENT R&D SPENDING ON CONVENTIONAL
                                       AND ADVANCED SYSTEMS
                                   4 - MAJOR GOVERNMENT/INDUSTRY PROGRAM
1973
                1980
                                      1990
                                                             2000
                                                                                   2010
                                                                                                          2020
                                                      YEARS
                  Fig. 3   Depletion  of  "Auto Share" of Domestic  Oil Reserves

-------
reserves somehow could be increased by a factor of 5 (Ref:  Meadows and the
Club of Rome Report), and assuming that the automobile's share of these total
resources remains fixed,Kthen Curve 1 applies where the current nationwide
average fuel economy of 13.6 mpg  remains fixed for all cars on the road with
projected growth In numbers of vehicles assumed.  Under these extreme circum-
stances we would be out of domestic petroleum before the year 2000.

Curve 2 assumes introduction into the marketplace of 10 million new vehicles
yearly starting in 1975 and getting an average of 30% improvement overall in
fuel economy perhaps due to lower power/weight, rear axle ratio change,
increase in smaller size car mix, etc.  This kind of improvement (if it could
be achieved) would increase the  'run-out1  point by about 5 years.

Curve 3 continues with the Curve  2 scenario, but additionally considers intro-
duction into the marketplace by  1980 and after, of automobiles with a 100%
improvement  (doubling) in fuel economy  (to 28 mpg).  This would result in an
extra 3 years.   If Curve 3  is achievable,  it may be so with use of completely
different engines and vehicular  system concepts than those available today.

Finally Curve 4  is similar  to Curve 2 and  3 until 1985 where 40 wpg overall
average for  new automobiles would be introduced and would continue thereafter.
To achieve 40 mpg may well  require a major Indus try/government R&D effort.
If successful that would give us  an additional 20 years over the baseline,
Curve 1.  Under crisis conditions that could be significant.

Although it  is not necessary  to  agree now  on the practicability of achieving
these fuel economy levels at  least the  trends are apparent:

     1.   If no one does anything - either the public,  industry, or the
          Government - and  petroleum is considered in the future as uncon-
          strained as in the  past, then the petroleum would be gone by 2000.

     2.   If a business an  usual  stance is adopted, an  extra couple of years
          may be achieved.
                                       -8-

-------
     3.   If Federally sponsored research focuses only on energy conversion
          efficiency improvements with only long range impact, the effects
          will be insignificant.

     4.   A major government/industry effort to improve efficiency of energy
          conversion in automobiles may still gain only about 20 years on this
          basis.

This does not say that working on improvements in energy conversion efficiency
are wasted effort.  However, it is only one area where research is needed;
research is also needed in conjunction with other parallel development acti-
vities.

When it comes to measures that may have short term impact, increasing cost to
the consumer is frequently mentioned as a natural means to reduce consumption.
This could take the form of a. tax for example; however, it probably would take
an enormous increase in gasoline cost to have an appreciable effect on con-
suaiption.  In Europe, since lifting the embargo, even higher gasoline prices
than shown in Fig. 4, have hardly made a dent in total consumption rates.
Other so-called institutional measures would include modal shifts, carpooling
and even regulatory measures.   Institutional changes then do offer the possi-
bility of near-term impact.  VThat is needed here is knowledge - knowledge of
what can and cannot be accomplished on current engine and vehicle systems.

Other means considered to reduce petroleum energy consumption include use of
alternative fuels.  Figure 5 applies to the total petroleum consumption  (not
just to autos) because it is a more straightforward illustration than one
made up only for automobiles.   The shaded dots through  1972 are historical
data; the dots for later years  are from Shell estimates.  Using the best
estimates available to us on realistic growth of availability of either methanol
fron coal, gasoline-like fuel from coal or gasoline-like fuel from shale., the
projected impact is shown.  It  is apparent that if alternative fuels come as
currently expected, they cannot have significant impact until the 1990 time
period.  It should be noted that the President's Project Independence aims at
moving these curves back to 1.0.
                                       -9-

-------
o
i
                                    Fig.  4   The Price of Gasoline in Relation to Income

-------
  1.0
UJ
v>


o
  0.8
O




P 0.6
u

o
o
K
O.

U
  0.4
O
Q
  0.2
                                                    IMPORTS

                                                   CRUDE OIL
                                                     SHALE OIL AND COAL AS

                                                     SUBSTITUTE SOURCES FOR

                                                     LIQUID FUELS
  DOMESTIC

 CRUDE OIL
                                                     EITHER SHALE OIL OR COAL

                                                     AS SUBSTITUTE SOURCE FOR

                                                     LIQUID FUELS
    0
    I960
1960
1970
1930
 1990

YEAR
2000
                                                                           2010
                                 Fig.  5   Alternate Fuel Sources

-------
The separate effects of higher energy conversion efficiency, alternative
fuels, and institutional changes on a baseline petroleum consumption curve
have been discussed.  Each by itself can contribute somewhat toward changing
the i,lope of the consumption curve.  This is the impact we seek, but when
applied together, the combined impact can be appreciable.  Hence, to effect
needed reductions in consumption, a balanced technology program is one of the
important factors needed.                                             	

By standing back and looking to the past and future regarding energy sources
for transportation it is recognized that all of the fossil fuel sources are
finite.  Also, changes in demand or consumption merely lengthen the time to
ultimate depletion; therefore, although we expect certain alternative fuels
will come along, current planning should consider hot: to make effective use of
the virtually unlimited nuclear and solar sources of energy (Fig. 6).

Looking at these future energy sources and how they can be used for transpor-
tation fuel gives further guidance for directions of effort.  As illustrated
in Fig. 7 the primary energy source must go through some intermediate form
and then through a conversion device to provide -mot-ive power for the trsnspor=
tation vehicle.  Crude oil  (or shale oil) or coal are compatible with internal
and external conversion devices either in their conventional or somewhat
advanced form.  When the intermediate energy form is heat or electrical power
(or is used for hydrogen generation) new transportation conversion systems will
be needed.  Probably these will be either electric or heat storage driven, or
completely new hydrogen propulsion systems.  New fuel distribution and handling
systems also will be needed.

Now consider natural resources.  The issue anticipated in the near future  is
the limitation of our mineral resources and the demands on oar  reserves of
natural resources for the automobile.  Tabulated in Fig. 8 are  the amounts of
various materials found  in a typical 1970 car (4100 Ibs).  We have shown
the weights of material used directly in the manufactured auto  and the amounts
of material needed  in the after-market to keep the vehicle oa the  road  for its
average 10-year  life.   It is seen that the automobile accounts  for significant
percentages of the  total U.S. use of many of these materials.
                                      -12-

-------
U!
I
 SUPPLY

DEMAND
                                                             PROJECT INDEPENDENCE)
                                     IMPORTED CRUDE OIL

                                         (U.S. SHORTAGE)
                                                                                           xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
                                                                                          X/XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX^^XXX
                                                                                                                      xxx/xxxx
                                                                                               NUCLEAR & SOLAR
                             DOMESTIC CRUDE OIL
                                                                               XxXX/XXXXXXxXXXXXXXX/XXXXX'XXXXXXXyXXXXXXXXXXX
                                                                            ••'/'/xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/xxx/xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
                                                                               ''XXX'/XXXXXXXXX'XXXXXXX/XXXXXXXX 'XXXXX/XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
                                                                                 ''/XXXXXXXXXXXX/XXXXXXXXX^XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
                                                                                                        xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
                                                                  TIME
                              Fig. 6    Future Projection of Energy Sources  for Transportation Fuels

-------
MAJOR ENERGY SOURCES
      CRUDE OIL
      COAL
      NUCLEAR
INTERMEDIATE FORM
 REFINED LIQUID FUEL
 GAS
 LIQUID FUEL
 ELECTRICAL
 ELECTRICAL
 HEAT
  TRANSPORTATION
CONVERSION DEVICES
INTERNAL COMBUSTION SYSTEMS

EXTERNAL COMBUSTION SYSTEMS

INTERNAL COMBUSTION SYSTEMS
EXTERNAL COMBUSTION SYSTEMS
ELECTRIC STORAGE
HEAT STORAGE

ELECTRIC STORAGE   <
HEAT STORAGE      \
INT AND/OR EXT COMBUSTION SYSTEMS
      SOLAR
ELECTRICITY
HEAT
ELECTRIC STORAGE
HEAT STORAGE
INT AND/OR EXT COMBUSTION SYSTEMS
              Fig.  7   Using Future Energy Sources  for Transportation Fuel

-------
METAL
IRON
ALUMINUM
LEAD
COPPER
ZINC
NICKEL
CHROMIUM
MOLYBDENUM
MANGANESE
TIN
DIRECT
AFTER MARKET
(POUNDS/AUTO)
3.500
65
28
30
65
4.5
8
.5
12
2
496
17.7
99.3
7.9
12.2
.35
.23
-
3.5
.04
TOTAL
AUTO USE
1973
TOTAL
U.S. USE
1970
(MILLIONS OF POUNDS)
38,633
799.5
1.230.7
366.4
746.4
46.9
79.6
4.8
14P/.9
19.7
324,000
7,835
2,710
4.370
2.300
311
684
76
2,296
164
PERCENT
USED IN
U.S. AUTOS
(1950 • 1970 AVG.)
10
9
40
7.3
28.4
13.7
9.1
5.6
5.7
10.5
Fig. 8   Auto Metal Consumption

-------
Figure 9 shows the methodology used to obtain years of supply remaining which
appear in Fig. 10.  Considered are:  total world reserve of each metal, total
U.S. annual consumption of the metal as well as the fraction of the annual
U.S. consumption of the metal needed for automobiles.  Assuming that this
'share1 remains fixed, an estimate can be made of the years until depletion,
of the world reserve.             -,,

Obviously this will change if the average car weight changes and also as the
mix of materials in the car changes.  A 2500 Ib. vehicle and a 4100 Ib. vehicle
were studied.  Also,  it is unlikely that the U.S. will continue to get as large
a share of the world  use as other countries develop.  New reserves may also
be found that will change the picture somewhat - but at least some perspective
can be obtained from  these data.  It is added that the recycling situation
today has been considered with each material and has been factored into the
results shown.  For example, lead has a 60% recycle rate, iron 477.,, tin 5%,
etc.  (Based on Dept. of Interior Data)

Thus, serious problems lie ahead if materials like lead, zinc and tin continue
to be used at current rates.  The trend toward lower car weights will help
somewhat, but the major influences will be the net balance between increasing
demand for these materials from the rest of the world and the discovery of new
supplies.  The true picture is not easy to pin down since the actual reserves
are often masked by economic and trade policies and even by the tax laws.

This area needs much  more intensive study, particularly when looking ahead to
possibilities like the electric car and battery storage.  Basically, natural
resources are finite, and as new solutions to shortages of energy are soucht,
blind alleys involving other resources should be avoided.  The path must be
carefully chosen and  consideration given to how much of the needed critical
materials can be recycled.

Another aspect of natural resources is the impact on balance of payments.
Figure 11 shows how the amount of certain materials used in the automobile
compares with the total percent of tho-•; materials imported by the U.S.  It
is seen that if the content of certain materials in the car., like copper,
                                        -16-

-------
--J
I
             U.S. SHARE
            =% ANNUAL
               USE
                                                                                                U.S. AUTO ANNUAL
                                                                                                      'ISE
 U.S. AUTO SHARE
 = % ANNUAL USE
                                                                                                  /   #• SCOOPS •
                                                                                                  I    # YEARS
          WORLD RESERVE
"U.S. SHARE" OF
WORLD RESERVE
 "U.S. AUTO SHARE"
OF WORLD RESERVE
         Data Source — U.S. Bureau of Minos.
          "Mineral Facts and Problems." 1970
                                 Fig. 9   Kechodology for Determining Years  of Supply Remaining
                                          for Critical Materials (All Data Static at 1970)

-------
               500 -
                       D
               400
1971 WT.  SN °ROJ.
40SI #       CAR
            WEIGHTS
  DOT- 2 GROWTH
i
t—'
oo
               300
             V)
             E
               200
               100



                                                              S





 ESS
i
                          TIN
                                  ZINC
                LEAD    MOLYB-    COPPER   MANGA-    ALUMI-   NICKEL     IRON
                        DENUM             NESE      MUM
                                                                                                         CHRO-
                                                                                                         MIUM
                                Fig. 10    Years to Depletion of  U.  S. Auto  Reserve  - Materials

-------
IVU
90
80
70


60
t-
550
u
cc
UJ
a.
40
30
20
10
ft
M
r"J% OF TOTAL U.S.
•— 'USE IMPORTED

E3% OF TOTAL U.S.
USE FOR AUTOS
-

—



-

: ™
MOLYB- COPPER IRON
DENUM














R^
I
1










I


















1
LEAD ZINC NICKEL


































,
























MW


























1
TIN ALUMI- MANGA
NUM NESE










































CHRO-
MIUM
                               MATERIALS
Fig. II   Natural Resources  - Auto Use and Imports (1970)

-------
lead, iron and zinc, could be reduced,  there could probably be an Immediate
benefit from reduced imports.

F.   Preliminary Conclusions, Directions and Criteria  for New Programs
Integration of the above data and observations has lead  to the following
primary conclusions:
          • Alternative fuels appear required to  achieve "Project Independence".
          • Major improvements  in conventional and alternative propulsion
            systems will:
                 a) extend depletion time  of domestic  oil reserves
                 b) reduce the  magnitude of the  import peak
                 c) accelerate  achievement of Project  Independence
          • Future energy sources,  such as solar  and nuclear, will require
            different  propulsion systems than will petroleum and its substi-
            tutes.
          • Major national programs are required  to achieve impact.

Some of  the secondary  conclusions are:
          • Small early  improvements may have far more impact on the major
            issues  in  the long  run  than big improvements that take a long
            time to achieve.
          • The trend  to small  cars must be encouraged,  with th« objective for
            even smaller utilitarian design in the future.
          • Future automobiles  must be  considered as part of the "Transporta-
            tion System" to  optimize impact on the issues.  Strategy and auf.o
            design have  to get  together.
          • Efforts  to improve  energy or resource conservation by increasing
            vehicle  useful  life must be planned  carefully.  The  inertia of the
            systeir.  increases with vehicle  life and introduction  time for changes.

Based on these conclusions,  three broad areas have been  selected for program
direction; specific  projects are being  selected  in each  area; feedback from
this meeting will weigh  heavily in  the  selection of projects:
                                       -20-

-------
          • Improved Energy Conversion System Development
          • Alternative Fuel and Fuel Systems Development
          • Advanced Energy Systems Development

The primary criteria being used in selecting the projects are:
          • Lead time to impact
          • Impact potential
                 — Energy
                 - Fuel
                 - Materials
                 — Pollution
          • Public acceptance
                 — Safety
                 — Performance
                 — Cost
          • Industry acceptance

It is anticipated that discussion arid feedback from this meeting will assist
in quantifying the above criteria.   It is recognized that industry acceptance
of any new technology developed by the Government is Imperative.  Without it,
innovations will not be implemented and will not reach the market place; the
impact on national issues will be zero.

Consequently, the proposed objective and specific goals for the new program are:

                                   GOAL

     IMPLEMENT A BALANCED PROGRAM IN AUTOMOTIVE GROUND TRANSPORTATION
     THAT PROVIDES TECHNOLOGY FOR INDUSTRY AND GOVERNMENT TO IMPACT ON
     NATIONAL ISSUES SUCH AS ENERGY, NATURAL RESOURCES, POLLUTION AND
     BALANCE OF PAYMENTS.
                                      -21-
                  /

-------
                                   OBJECTIVES

• CONSERVATION OF ENERGY

          - CONVENTIONAL FUEL
                 DEMONSTRATE  AND  EVALUATE  IN A  VEHICLE AN AUTOMOTIVE PROPUL-
                 SION  SYSTEM  TO DOUBLE  THE FUEL ECONOMY  OF CURRENT  (1974)
                 AUTOMOBILES  WHILE MEETING 1977 EMISSION STANDARDS.

          - UNCONVENTIONAL FUEL
                 DEMONSTRATE  AND  EVALUATE  IN A  VEHICLE AN ADVANCED AUTOMOTIVE
                 PROPULSION SYSTEM WHICH IS CONSTRUCTED  OF NONCRITICAL
                 MATERIALS AND WHICH OPERATES ON PLENTIFUL NONPETROLEUM FUELS
                 WHILE MEETING 1977 EMISSION STANDARDS.

• CONSERVATION' OF NATURAL RESOURCES
         -  MATERIALS
                 DEMONSTRATE  AND  EVALUATE  IN A  VEHICLE AN ADVANCED AUTOMOTIVE
                 POWER SYSTEM USING NONCRITICAL MATERIALS, INCLUDING NONMETALLIC
                 MATERIALS, WHICH WILL MEET 1977 EMISSION STANDARDS AND HAVE
                 HIGH  FUEL ECONOMY.
         - MATERIALS  AND ENERGY
                 DEMONSTRATE  AND  EVALUATE  IN A  VEHICLE AN ADVANCED AUTOMOTIVE
                 POWER SYSTEM WHOSE LIFE AND DURABILITY  ARE DOUBLE  THAT OF PRE-
                 SENT  SYSTEMS WHILE MEETING FUEL ECONOMY AND EMISSION STANDARDS.

Questions  and Comments
Question (Mr. Scully,  U.S.  Army Tank Automotive  Command):  It is understood
     that if hydrogen  were economically available, present technology engines
     and machines could be used with  little modification and no sacrifice in
     emission performance  or  life  style.   What  progress  is being made toward
     this possible solution to the  fuel  problem?
Answer:  No practical  approach to  the key  problem of on-boarr1 storage of
     hydrogen has been identified.   If  this, and  economical production prob-
     lems can be solved, hydrogen may become a  promising alternative fuel.
                                       -22-

-------
     A recent Request For Proposal to a large sector of the technical conanunity,
     soliciting new approaches to the problem, had disappointing results.
     Three small programs on storing hydrogen in other forms are being con-
     sidered.  No practical cryogenic system was suggested.  Another RFP is
     expected to be issued in about 6 months.

     Projections in the ESSO, Alternative Fuel Study (See Section V-C)
     indicate that hydrogen will not be available in quantities sufficient
     to supply any significant percentage of the requirements until after
     the year 2000.
Comment (Walter Stewart, Los Alamos Scientific laboratory):  Los Alamos has
     under development a liquid hydrogen storage and re-fueling system for
     automotive applications.

Question (Dr. Brown, University of Rhode Island):  In trying to develop a
     program for a new Diesel engine, with some half dozen agencies, it
     was apparent that no one group or agency is coordinating automotive pro-
     pulsion research and development at the national level.  Is this situation
     being corrected?  Also, the current AAPS Program seems primarily con-
     cerned with demonstration and evaluation of concepts which are nominally
     within five years of engineering or production prototypes.  This does not
     seem to allow for the growth and development of newer, more advanced
     concepts which often require more than five years of research and develop-
     ment.
Answer;  The confusion in coordinating Government automotive research and
     development is recognized, both in and outside the Government, particu-
     larly since the Office of Science and Technology was dropped.  It is
     anticipated that the new Energy Research and Development Agency will  be
     the vehicle which will correct this situation.  It should also be recog-
     nized that the AAPS program constitutes a new situation for the Govern-
     ment.  Heretofore, development of consumer oriented hardware was left
     entirely to industry.   But, as pointed out earlier, the automobile has
     a broad impact on our economy, environment, and resources justifying
     limited activity on critical problems.  Consequently, the AAPS program
     has evolved with the care and caution which a new situation in Government
                                      -23-
                                                      \

-------
     activity warrants.  As the needs and requirements of the Nation are more
     clearly defined, it is expected that a longer term, better funded program
     will emerge.
Answer:  A representative from DOT pointed out that R&D in the automotive area
     is coordinated once a year.  Agencies are kept informed of each others
     activities.  Each Agency submits a budget to the Office of Management and
     Budget.  Congress decides what is to be done.  Past policy has left near
     term R&D in this area to industry; whereas, long term effort has been
     supported by the Government.

Question (Mr. Huber, Consultant):  In considering the automotive issues over
     the years; i.e., cost (1900-1965), emissions (1965), energy (1974), and
     natural resources (anticipated in 1975), no mention rfas made of the
     initial issue which started the whole sequence--the desire for a personal
     transportation syscem.  Now, since the more widely dispersed urban popu-
     lation centers are heavily dependent on frequently available autos and
     trucks, contemplated changes in propulsion systems must take into con-
     sideration the effect en the ability of the car to meet present socio-
     economic needs for baste transportation.  For example, the near term
     electric car will not have the cruising radius, it will have poorer
     perfomance, and  it may use more, not less, resources wince a lot of lead
     is required in lead-acid batteries.  And now, two cars are needed to meet
     all demands whereas, heretofore, one was adequate.  So, the electric car
     for emissions might not be a real cure when the other issues are con-
     sidered.  Are these basic transportation requirements being considered?
Answer:  Because of low cost, wide availability of the automobile, many
     segments of our earlier transportation system in major citic-s such as
     streetcars, trains, and busses have deteriorated or stopped.  Industry
     and population centers have dispersed.  As a result of current issues,
     the transportation system is even now in the process of being reconstructed
     to meet the needs of the people.  A big problem has evolved; significant
     action and changes are required to solve the problem.

     The Department or Transportation has been addressing this problem.  The
     annual budget went from 2 million dollars this year to 6 million dollars
                                       -24-

-------
     for the next fiscal year.  This effort is directed to discerning the
     facts, evaluating approaches and understanding the needs, secondary
     costs and ramifications of various potential solutions.  It is to provide
     information on which to base policy.

Question (R. W. Hum, Bureau of Mines):   It was mentioned that any relaxation
     of emission standards would constitute a loss of progress.   It is
     suggested that required emission levels be considered from the technical
     viewpoint of the trade-offs involved with the cost of energy and environ-
     mental control.

     In considering hydrogen as a future  fuel, it was pointed out that all of
     the current alternative fuels are hydrogen deficient unless they are to
     be used as solid fuels.  A very big  problem is where will enough hydrogen
     be found to convert  the solid fuels?
Answer:  The National Academy of Science  is examining the trade-offs between
     emission levels and  energy cost; they will be making recommendations to
     Congress probably  this summer.   It  is expected that these reconraendations
     will  reflect the results of these studies and may or may not be the same
     as present l^sislated standards.

Question  (Dr. W. Uryniszak, Clarke Chapman):   Regarding Fig. 3, what is the
     basis of assuming  a  factor of 5  for  increased recoverable oil reserves?
     It sounds high compared  to the 2 or  3 which has been mentioned in England.
Answer;  The intent of  the chart in Fig.  3  is  to determine, qualitatively,
     the relative impact  of an early  versus a  late entry of our advanced trans-
     portation system on  the depletion of recoverable world oil reserves.  So
     a more accurate basis, other  than  that used by Meadows,  for estimating
     new discoveries was  not warranted.   The  values used were 40 billion
     barrels of crude—present reserves—times 5 for future discovery gives
     200 billion barrels.   It was assumed that 30 percent of  this would be
     used  for surface transportation.
                                       -25-

-------
Question (Don Lapedes, Aerospace Corporation):  The lead time from concept
     to mass production in the automotive industry can be 15 to 20 years,
     so impact or effect of current research on new concepts is necessarily
     far off.  What are the prospects for reducing this lead time, so that
     needed effect or impact can be realized sooner?
Answer:  The most likely place to reduce lead time is in the R&D phases to
     reduce the time required to reach the production engineering stage.
     Parallel effort on several candidate approaches and concepts can compress
     the time required for the R&D phases, but it must be accepted that a
     much larger Government/Industry investment will be required to bring this
     about.  Current and past efforts have been more of the series type because
     of the limited money available for R&D.

Question (John Stone, Mitre Corporation):  One approach to conservation of
     energy and resources is to reduce the demand for individual transportation
     systems.  Is the Government investigating such plausible substitutes as
     telecommunications?
Answer (Bob Rusted, DOT):  Such factors as telecommunications, aimed at
     reducing the vehicle niles traveled, have been studied and are being
     planned for future programs.

Question (Carl Bachle, Consultant):  What is  the total amount of money being
     spent by the Government on R&D in this area; bow much should be spent?
Answer:  In FY '74 about 20 million dollars were budgeted; in FY  '75 about 32
     million dollars are budgeted.  This includes in-house salaries, paper
     studies, hardware, etc. being spent in AEC, NSF, EPA, DOD, DOT and NASA.
     This  indicates how splintered the effort is.  The amount which should be
     spent will depend on the top level leadership in assessing the gravity of
     the energy crisis and establishing the specific goals to be  reached.
     With established goals, requirements can be identified  and costs  estimated.

Question (Carl Bachle, Consultant):  With the apparent need  for short  term
     improvement in fuel economy, why is so little effort and  emphasis  being
     given to the Diesel engine?
                                       -26-

-------
Answer:  Considerable attention is being given to the Diesel engine; however,
     due to planning and procurement lead time in the Government, very little
     about this effort has been released as yet.

Question (Dr. J. E. Davoud, D-Cycle Power Systems):  Has serious consideration
     been given to chemicals which can be produced from crops (such as methanol,
     ethanol, acetone, etc.) as alternative fuele?
                                     •i
Answer:  Two contractors are studying all of  the alternative fuels available
     from domestic sources.  Methanol derived from coal is a leading contender.
     These programs are reviewed  and discussed  in Section V~B and C.
Comment  (Commander E. Tyrrel, Department of Trade and Industry - London):
     Many people in England believe that the  advantages of liquid hydrocarbons
     as a fuel for transportation vehicles are  so great as compared to other
     uses that in the short term  perhaps they should be conserved and used only
     for that purpose.
Answer:  There seems to be general agreement  in the U.S. that liquid hydro-
     carbons will be used  in automobiles at least through the end of this
     century.  Pressure will be on stationary power systems to use substitute
     fuels.

Question:  What are the AAPS funding plans for  the automotive R&D, particularly
     regarding increased effort?

Answer;  The AAPS  Division budget started  FY  '74  at  7 million dollars.   During
     the year,  it  was  increased  to  12  million dollars.  The budget  submitted
     for FY  '75  is  17  million  dollars.   It  is not known how this will change
     during  the next year  (FY-75).   Current plans  call  for approximately 6
     million dollars for  the continuation  of  the  current gas turbine and Rankine
     engine  programs;  11 million  dollars will be  devoted to the  other aspects  of
     the AAPS effort including:   use of  alternate  fuels, electric propulsion
     system  studies, investigations of new concepts and in-house overhead.
                                    -27-

-------
Comment (Paul Vickers, General  Motors  Research):   Some  of  the solutions to
     the energy crisis might  ultimately  limit  the  individual's  freedom of
     mobility.  Care  should be  taken  to  cnake sure  realistic emission standards
     are set  in view  of  all of  the surrounding priorities  and circumstances.
Comment (Ernest Petrick,  U.S. Army Tank  Automotive Command):  Concerning the
     proposed goals above,  it is  imperative  that  the  specific duty cycle of
     the vehicle  be specified along with the method and instrumentation for
     measuring  the fuel  economy.   On  this basis,  numerical values for fuel
     economy  of current  (1974)  automobiles should  be  established and the
     numerical goals  set for  future vehicles to achieve within  a specified
     time  frame.

     It is suggested  that the non-critical materials  element be eliminated
     from  the "unconventional fuel" goal; it is really  part of  the "conserva-
     tion  of  natural  resources" goal.

     It seems that a  basic  decision should be  made as to whether to develop
     the fuel to  satisfy the  current  engine/vehicle requirements, or to
     develop  the  engine  to  satisfy the fuel  requirements.

Questions  (Dr.  Sternlicht,  M.T.I.):  Because the American  economy is definitely
     tied  to  the  automobile as  well as housing and other items, because the
     national issues  identified are major, and because  potential pay-off of
     the AAPS program is very big, the following  three  questions are important
     to the future development  of the AAPS program:
           • How does  the AAPS Program get a  balanced  share of Government
             attention,  so that  it gets commensurate funding and priority?
           • How do you  motivate people in the  technical community to partici-
             pate  and  contribute to the program?
           « How is  the  time reduced which is required to transfer the technology
             to  the  industry at  large,  and into meaningful  production activity;
             i.e., early  achievement of Project Independence, higher  living
             standards,  and  increased  automotive exports?
                                       -28-

-------
Answer:  Strong industrial support and endorsement of  the AAPS program through
     their representatives in Washington would be very helpful in getting a
     balanced share of attention and an appropriate priority  level established.

     It seems that the technical community  is getting motivated; perhaps the
     problem is how to accelerate  the motivation.

     The AAPS Coordination Meeting  is one means of disseminating information
     and getting direct  response from knowledgeable people  in the industry.
Comment (A. F. Underwood, Consultant):  At  the recent SAE Meeting in Los
     Angeles, three standard vehicles were  operating which  provided 30-40 mpg
     with "Standard" car performance.  These cars, with a form of Diesel
     engine, are in production  not  in the U.S.; 70-100 mpg  are projected.  (No
     other information was available.)

     Stratified charge engines  and  Stirling engines have the  same potential
     fuel econotay with low emissions and should be getting  AAPS attention in
     the I980's.

Question:  In typical free enterprise systems, the communication link an^. lead
     time between the consumer  in  the market place and the  provider <"industry)
     is generally short  and  relatively direct.  Lead  time for feedback is of
     the order of one year.   In a  situation such as the energy crisis where
     lead times are longer -  10 years or more - and there is  broad impact on
     the public, wherein lies the  responsibility for  alerting and informing
     the public, so that industry  can get appropriate  feedback in time to pur-
     sue the needed product  development?   Is this a Government responsibility
     of should industry  handle  it?
Answer:  No answer presently exists.
                                       -29-

-------
II.  SUMMARY OF CURRENT  STATUS.  PLANS.  AND ACCOMPLISHMENTS  ON AAPS  PROGRAMS.
     BY GEORGE M.  THUR.  CHIEF,  POWER SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT BRANCH
AAPS Division activities  have  encompassed  the following  avenues  of approach to
'alternate  power  systems:
                                   i
           • Gas  Turbine Engines
           • Rankine Cycle Engines
           • Stratified Charge  Engines (Further engineering development  now
             completely under Army support)
           • Diesel Engines (Supplemental budget increase during  FY  '74  now
             peraits support of needed programs on Diesel engines.  These  are
             being implemented.)
           • Rotary Otto Cycle  Engines
           • Stirling Cycle Engines
           • Hybrid Engines (Heat Engine/Battery; Heat Engine/Flywheel)
           • Electric Vehicles
           • Alternative Fuels
           • Improvements  in Conventional Systems

 To date, emphasis has been on  the gas turbine and Rankine engines.   VJork is
 in its early stage;? on alternative fuels and electrics.  These are discussed
 in more detail below along with  a summary of the general AAPS status and
 accompi ishments.

 A.   Gas Turbines
 Tb~ gas turbine programs  are  structured to  focus on  the  prime problem areas
 associated with gas turbines:
           • Emissions  - high  NOx particularly
           « High manufacturing cost
           • Low part-lead fuel economy
                                        -30-

-------
The original Brayton Power Systems Development Team is shewn in Fig. 12.
Under an inter-agency agreement, NASA  (Lewis  Research Cc-nter) has been testing
and characterizing Chrysler's  Baseline Engine since September 1973.  Current
attention is focused on  identification of all of  the various losses, particu-
larly heat loss.  This information constitutes important input and guidance for
design of the next generation  engine.  Of the eight; different combustor tech-
nology contractors, the  Solar  approach was selected for adaptation to the
Baseline Engine.  Work continues on  recuperators  and regenerators.  A program
is being implemented with Ford Motor Company  to concentrate on the known.
problems of the ceramic  regenerator.   Pratt & Whitney has recently achieved
very promising results on the  low cost turbine wheel manufacturing program.
There were a number of studies (reported at previous meetings) on cost and
economics.  Work continues on  the major gas turbine program at Chrysler on
component and system  improvements as well as  the  gas turbine1 u^j-.»d ing program.

Since the last AAPS Coordination Meeting, an  important decision was made to
redirect the program  from an intermediate size automobile to a compact car.
This has involved major  changes and  modification,  of the effort at both Chrysler
and NASA.  Preliminary design  has been started on an upgraded engine for compact
car requirements.

In-house effort at  EPA has concentrated on vehicle tests including emission
and particulate measurements and evaluation of test procedures.  The objective
is to use the technology evolving  from the Baseline Engine Program and the
advanced technology programs,  and  to demonstrate  a gas turbine vehicle with
good fuel economy and  low emissions  in calendar year 1976.

NASA is also looking  at  the  technology for applications beyond 1976 including
such items as ceramics,  gas bearings,  advanced aerodynamic designs and iool-
ing concepts.  With these elements,  it may be possible to have a 20 mpg gas
turbine vehicle on  the road within  10  years.

EL   Rankine Engines
The Rankine Program has  concentrated on  the  following problem areas:
          • Emissions  (problem now  considered under control)
          • Condenser  size and weight
                                       -31-

-------
                                         AAP5
              BRKfTON POWER SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT TEAM
      NASA LEWIS TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM
     COMBUSm  HEATEXCH.
                             (LOWCOST)
       CATALYTIC
       (/MOUSE)
       SOLAR
       GE.
       ALRC
\OWENSILLINOIS   \A/R
^CORNING       ^Piw
*
u>
N)
                                             \EPA TECHNOLOGY PROGRAMS}

                                   COMbUSTOR  HEAT'EKCH.  mfWWCOST) STWItS
                                   -mUAMSRES.
                                   A/K
                                   PW
                                   MTI
                                   NORTHRtS.
                                   -6E
                                   ALKC
            \OW£NSIUIHOIS
            WRHING
                                                            W
                                                                  \rWIUlAM5
                                                                   RES.
                                   WANCW
                                   TURB.MS.
                            SYSTEM IMPROVEMENT
             NASA (LEWIS)
 SYSTEM       AERODYNAMIC
IMPROVEMENT   IMPROVEMENT
                                          SYSTEM
       COMPONENT
        TESTING
       FOWERSYSTEM
        TESTING
                 \TURBINE
                 \COMPRtSSOR
                 \-flOWPASM6ES
COMPONENT
 TESTING
POWERSr$TEM
 TESTING
VEHICLE TESTING
                                        COMPONENT     GKS TURBIMt
                                        mPmEMENT     UPSWING
                                         \-CONTROLS
                                          ftfEXCtf.
                                         • TRANSMISSION
                                         -INHQUSECOMBVSTOR
                                         - 6FE (FROM NASA TECH. PROGRAMS)
                                         - NOZZLE ACTUATOR
                                         -FREEROTOR
                       Fig. 12  AAPS Braytbn Power Systems Development Team

-------
          • Control complexity
          • Freezing (when using water as the working fluid)
          • Thermal degradation problem (when using organic fluids)
          • Lubrication problem of reciprocating systems
          • Valve design problems of reciprocating systems
          o Doiler size and weight

Initially, technology programs and four different engine developments were
pursued:  reciprocating organic and steam systems; and rotary (turbine)
organic and steam systems.  The reciprocating steam engine of Scientific
Energy Systems, Inc. was selected at the end of 1973 for further development
through the prototype stage; the Thermo Electron organic reciprocating engine
is continuing at a reduced level of effort as a back-up system.

The implications of switching to a compact car with the SES engine are being
assessed.  This means that the demonstration in a car originally scheduled for
late 1975 will have to be re-scheduled in 1976.

C.   Alternative Fuels Program
The objective of the Alternative Fuels Program is to evaluate the impact of
using othci- fuels in automotiles and trucks on the national economy, environ-
ment and resources. These fuels include:  methanol, gasoline  and distillates
from coal, shale  and hydrogen.  Research is being conducted  on  these fuels to
characterize their use in current and projected automotive engines.

The present feasibility studies on the above fuels are to be  completed in July
1974.  The impact study is to begin in July 1974.  Combustion research on
nethanol, gasoline and distillates was started in May 1974; research programs
on hydrogen storage in metal hydrides and chemical carriers are  in progress.

D.   Electric Vehicles
The objective is to evaluate the potential impact of electric cars on the
nation's economy, environment, and natural resources-;  Applicable critical
technology is to be developed.  The impact study for Los Angeles is  to be com-
pleted in November 1974.   Studies for Philadelphia and St. Louis are  to begin
in July 1974.
                                      -33-
                                              ,	^_

-------
E.   Overall AAPS Status and Accomplishments
The 12 million dollar AAPS Division budget for FY 1974 is broken down according
to the type of effort and purpose of the effort in Fig. 13.  This and the pre-
ceeding effort since inception of the AAPS program in 1970 have resulted in a
number of accomplishments:

Management Accomplishments
          • Established working relationship with automotive industry
          • Principal Government group conducting automotive R&D
          • Established and maintained technology transfer process
          • Identified need for new transportation criteria
          • Involved other governmental agencies
          • Developed understanding of automotive engineering practices
          • In 1972 established action plan to impact national need

Technical Accomplishments - Gas Turbine
          • Achieved 1977 emission levels under steady-state conditions
          • Completed 3500 hours durability test
          • Developed unconventional combustion concepts

Technical Accomplishments - Rankine
          • Bettered 1977 emission standards by 507.
          • Achieved peak steady-state fuel economy of 16 mpg on preprototype
            system
          • Packaging feasibility demonstrated without vehicle modification
          • Component sizes and weights reduced
          • Characterization of organic fluids and lubricants
          • Generation of computer system design tools
          • Developed unconventional combustion concepts

Technology Spin-Off - Gas Turbine
Much of the technology developed for the AAPS program  has  promise  for commercial
use in other sectors of the economy as follows:
                                      -34-

-------
EXPLORATORY
DEVELOPMENT
        62%
.„	GRANTS
                         Fig. 13  FY '74 Budget - $12,000,000

-------
          • Low Emission Combustor   —

          • Ceramic Heat Exchangers  —

          • Improved Manufacturing   —
            Process for Turbine
            Wheels
                             Land Gas Turbines, Aircraft,
                             Total Energy Systems
                             Exhaust Heat Recovery for Heating
                             Units, Power Systems
                                               *
                             Low Cost Turbine Wheels for
                             Turbo Charging Units, Aircraft
                             and Land Gas Turbine Units
Technology Spin-Off - Rankine
          • Organic Rankine
                         —  Indoor Personnel Carriers
                         —  Bottoming Cycle for Ship and
                             Stationary Powerplants
High Temp Lubricant      —  Special Purpose Engines
            Efficient - High
            Pressure Water Pumps
            Low Emissions Burner
            and Compact Boiler

            Improved Heat Exchanger
            Surfaces
                             Quick Auto Wash Industry
                             Home Water Heating Systems
                             Home Furnace (Stationary and Mobile)
                             Water Heaters
                             Total Energy Systems
                             Air Conditioning and Refrigeration
                             Auto Radiators
Technology Transfer
Communication and transfer of  the  technology developed on  the AAPS program is
being accomplished through the  following media-
          • Interaction  through Government contracts and Government agencies
                 — 37 Contracts issued
                 — 3 Government interagency agreements (NASA, DOD, DOT)
          • Technical Reports
                 — Over  60 technical  reports issued
                                      -36-

-------
          • Meetings
                 ~  Seven AAPS  coordination  meetings  to date  (every  4-5  months)
                              500
                       TOTAL  ...
                   ATTENDEES  25°
NUMBER OF
INDUSTRY AND
FOREIGN VISITORS
                 — Status  Review Meetings
                        —  GM -  2 meetirgs/year
                        —  Ford  - 4 meetings/year
                        —  Chrysler -  2 meetings/year

Questions and Comments
Question (Dr. D. Walzer, Volkswagen):  What  horsepower range  is being  con-
     sidered for the gas turbine in  the  compact car  in 19X6-1979?
Answer:  The present Chrysler program is considering  100  hp unaugmented  and
     122 hp augmented.  No projections have  been  made for 1979.
                                      -37-

-------
III.  GAS TURBINE ENGINE PROGRAM

A.    Baseline Engine Project by C. E. Wagner. T. D. Nogle,  R. C. Pampreen,
      and. J. I. Gumaer. Chrysler Corp.
Objective and Overall Status:  The basic  program objective  is  to show that the
gas turbine is a credible alternate automotive powerplant.   Using Chrysler's
sixth generation engine as a 3tate-of-the-art baseline engine, improvement pro-
grams are being conducted as a basis  for  designing, building and demonstrating
an  upgraded state-of-the-art engine.

Specifically,  the  final program  goal  is  to demonstrate the  Upgraded  Engine
powered  vehicle which:
                                               •
          • Uses significantly  less  fuel  than  a  comparably  powered spark
            ignition reciprocating engine.
          • Meets  the original  1976  emission standards.
          • Has  the potential  for being  mass produced and marketed compe-
            titively.

Delivery to the  program of  7  Baseline Engines  and  3 Baseline Vehicles has been
accomplished,  baseline improvement efforts continue,  and an Upgraded Engine
design  is underway (Fig.  14).

Baseline Vehicle Documentation:   Performance measurements resulting  from  the
installation  of  a  150 hp  Baseline  engine in a 1973 intermediate  size sedan
indicated an  elapsed time for 0-60 mph on an 85°F  day of about 12  seconds
(Fig.  15).   Peak fuel economy approaches 7.6 mpg (Fig.  16).   Some noise  measure-
ments comparing  the turbine to ^ standard S.I.,  reciprocating engine installa-
tion are as  follows:
                                           Turbine      Reciprocating
          Idle - Front (Fig.  17)          71 dB(A)       66  dB(A)
           !dle - Rear                     63 dB(A)       68  dB(A)
          Interior - 30 mph (Fig.  18)     60 dB(A)       59  dB(A)
          Interior - 60 mph               70 dB(A)       72  dB(A)
                                       -38-

-------
                               1973
BASELINE ENGINES
IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
UPGRADED ENGINE
197<+
1975
1976
          Fig.  14  Baseline  Gas Turbine Development Program Timing
                                  -39-

-------
0
    Car  618: J»650 Lb.  Total Test Wt.
       3/19/7^ T, =  33.5°F
       HR 78-1 k Tires  (Radial)
8
                       Time,  Seconds
                                                         _    -JOOO
                                                                Feet
                                                               _2000
                                                               J500
                                                         _    _ 500
Fig.  15   Baseline Vehicle Performance Speed and Distance vs. Time
                             -40-

-------
                                             CAR 618

                                             3/15/7^
                                                HR  78-1J*  Tires

                                                With oil  temperature control
                                                With manual  nozzle control

                                                Tl  Range  33° - 38°F
   16.0 	
   15.0 _
   T+.O
c
o
3  13.0
   12.0
  11.0
                                                T8 = 1300°F  Actual
                                                     T8 = Match  at Ambient

                                                       (1132°  -
            \
                                                      5  6
  10.0
       ~1
                   20
J,
                                  MPH
                                                            100
         Fig.  16   Baseline Vehicle Fuel Economy — Effect of Match Temperature

                  "At Ambient" on Fuel Economy  (Economy vs. MPH)
                                      -41-

-------

















65





Baseline Tiacbine, 1971* Vehicle
;97U Production S.I., V-8
Baseline Turbine, 1966 Vehicle




60










55



— 1-
ST
| SOUND PRESSURE LEVEL - dB





50


;
4_





«»5

(






/
/
^


\


\

ri 35
! '
A

— M





20
1

I
-4-




















































i
/
/
/
/
r^
/
! ! II





K,
\
\
\
_)


71
/
/
/


i




i





\
\
\ J

























'^_
M
LX' |\


/ \
/I \
//
J
t J/
1 iX*^
Symbol
A 	 A
X 	 X
O 	 O














i_


X Vi

/


1
I
!
i

1













Meter
dB(A)
71
66
70


	 1
/

'
1

Jff^



j^^T
/


\
-\ — '
\
^
\
V

y












i

.. A '- ^^
v~t
\
Mi^>VI
j^
/ 1
V

;

^^*N^
« "
i
"^w /
.V T~

/ 1




* )


i
•





\ »
^

\ V""V
s 'T ,\
A i >
^^^k
l

j


1

! !
!





ji
@>
T
t

I ;
._ i J
! ' 1 :

t ' i
i

i


i i :




i







i

»-•
1

	
I:::





-

i 1
;
i
—


— '-» 	 1
!








i ; '• i




i

i



i- . . _


i 1
i

!
























40 50 | 63
















i

•-
—
,
	 i. _



: 1 !

T 1





i |

i '•
I 1
! j












80 100

























	 |








-





r
1














125 |»60J200 | 250








I












1

...4-
i
1


i
\

" \ 	

--L-.
-i_




	
t
, i





i




















315 1 400J 500J630











































i
i


-J 	








i :




- 1 L





-


















800| IK [1.2KJ1.6K












!

i ,



i i
i |







































4- -
!
^.

1

;


1
i i
-H 	




1





1



















i























2K |2.5KJ3.1K| 4K | »V [6.3KJ 8K | 10K
4             CfflfER FREQUENCV OF THIRD OCTAVE BAND - H*

       Fig.  17   Comparative Vehicle Noise Tests - Idle, Vehicle Front
                C3 Ft. Ahead,  5 Ft. Up)
                                   -42-

-------
      Baseline Turbine,  1973  Vehicle
      197**  Prodjction S.I., V-8
      Baseline Turbine,  1966  Vehicle
 Symbol
A	&

O	O
Meter
dB(A)
  60
  59
  61
             CENTER FfSEOUENCY OF THIRD OCTAVE BAHO - H«
Fig.  18   Comparative  Vehicle Noise Tests - 30 1-IPH. Driver's Right Ear
                               -43-

-------
Engine Improvement - Burner/Emissions:  Support of the Baseline Program has
Included providing necessary burner hardware for all engines and vehicles.
General burner performance tnd durability are continually being upgraded, but
current designs are generally satisfactory for the Program.  Some Baseline
Vehicle emissions are shown in Fig. 19.

Fixture and vehicle emission results for one Chrysler proprietary burner (FL15)
are shown in Figs. 20, 21. and 22.  This burner provides very good emissions
when total engine systems are optimized as in Test 5 (Fig. 22).  However, com-
plete development of this burner is not being pursued as it does not show
promise of meeting the long-range requirements of 0-4 gram/mile.

Results of a second proprietary burner are shown in Fig. 23 compared to Base-
line and FL15 burners when operated over an engine dynamometer test cycle.
Though by no means fully developed, this burner does show potential of meeting
the 0.4 grass/sile NOx level if the transient spiking can be greatly reduced.
Continued efforts on this burner and  its control system will attempt to accomp-
lish this.

An adaptor has been readied for evaluation of the Solar burner at Chrysler
facilities (Fig.  24).

Engine Development •  Ceramic Regenerator:  This program consists of:
          • Evaluating available state-of-the-art cores to determine per-
            formance life and cost potential in an automotive application.
          • Developing a non-NiO rubbing seal.
          • Arriving at a specification for the Upgraded Engine regenerator.

While an alternate seal material is being developed, NiO seals will be used.
Extrfi processing  precautions being taken by the supplier of NiO seals, however,
have delayed delivery.  Core evaluations to date have required use of graphite
seals thereby limiting running to  1100-1200°F levels.  The seal prjgram  is
getting underway  using four-head friction test units and a wear teat unit
(Fig. 25).  Zirconium oxide is being  evaluated initially as a  possible alter-
native to nickel  oxide.
                                       -44-

-------
Test
No.
7
8
9
Test Type
Cold 1975
Cold 1975
Cold 1975
Power
Turbine
Nozzle
Cam
B
B
B
Corrected
HC
Hot FID
.742
.540
.546
Grams/Mi
CO
NDIR
8.70
9.51
9.05
le
NOx
Cl
1.52
1.80
2.09

16
17
18
Cold 1975
Cold 1975
Cold 1975
G
G
G
1.432
i . 500
0.515
4.55
3.91
4.78
2.1+5
2.61
1.87
Original  1975  Standards,  Goal     .41        3.4
      Fig. L9  Selected Baseline Vehicle Emissions
                     Car 667  - Vehicle  B
                           -45-

-------
  .LOO     100  .
  L350
  L300
  [250
          90 H
           80 J
           70 J
           60 J
        a.
        Q.
  1200   ^ 50J
o
u
         X
        o
  L150
  LI 00
  150
           30
           20
           10
  L  o
0
       O Ran  437,  12/14/73, FL7 Assembly - BaseMne

       4-Run  436,  12/14/731
        •Run  438,  12/l4/73f  FL15 AssemblV


      Concentrations vs. Gas Generator Speed
              50


             1 100
          50


         1200
                                                  NOx
 50
                                       60
70
                                          80
      Percent Speed
1300    1300    1300    i300
Actual Cycle Temperature  °F
 90      100


1300    1350
       Fig. 20  Chrysler Burner Program - Steady State Emissions, A-Fixture
                                    -46-

-------
   80 .i      Burner  Fixture
             Fixed Power Turbine Nozzles
             Diesel  Fuel
   70 -\
   60 H
   50 H
CL
o.
X
o
   30
	  Baseline Burner, FL7
	  FL15 Concept
   20
   10
             50% - 1100° T8  to
               70% Speed and
                  Return
                                        50% - 1200° T8 to
                                          80% Speed and
                                             Return
    0
                               Time
           Fig. 21  Chrysler Burner Program Acceleration NO  Formation
                                 -47-

-------
Corrected
Grams/Mi 1 e
Test
No.
1A
IB
2
3A
3B
4A
48
5A
5B
Power
Test Turbine
Type HC Control Nozzle*
Hot '72 Relight M,B
" " M,B
Cold '75 Continuous M,B
Flame
Hot '72 " M,B
" " M,B
" " F,B
" F,B
F
n it p
Blow-By
Included
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
HC
Hot
FID
1.52
1.10
- .26
- .16
- .35
- .39
- .J8
- .40
- .20
CO
NDIR
1.55
1.39
3.99
3.68
1.74
4.94
3.90
3.08
1.94
NOx
Cl
2.69
2,60
2.21
2.03
1.81
1.63
1.47
1.46
1.54
    * M
      F
      B
Modulated for part  load  temperature  scheduling.
Fixed  at  maximum power  setting for all  power levels.
With braking stroke.
Fig.  22   Chrysler Burner Concept FL15-Vehicle Tests
             Diesel Fuel, 4500 Lb. Inertia
                     December 1973
                       -48-

-------
   70
   60
   50
CL
0.
   30
   20
   10
        Baseline with Variable
          Second Stage Nozzles

        FL15 with Fixed Nozzles
        Proprietary Burner with
          Variable Nozzles
    0
       0
   3

Minutes
           Fig. 23   Cycle NO  fRoom A Development Cycle
                              -49-

-------
Sola--  Burner
Moun 'ing Flange
Burner
Outlet Flow
Quartz
Window
            Chrysler Engine
            Mounting Flange
                                                Regenerated
                                                   Vortex
                                                   Entry
                 Fig. 24   Solar Burner Adaptor
                            -50-

-------
Fig. 25   Ceramic Regenerator Seal - Friction and Wear Test Fixture, Exterior

-------
Engine Improvement - Integrated Control System:  A low cost control system to
meet Upgraded Engine requirements is being developed by Garrett Corporation
under a subcontract.  Their progress is summarized in Section  III-D.

Tests have been run to determine engine characteristics while  the gas generator
is accelerating.  Results, shown in Fig. 26,  indicate that under a fast accelera-
tion stable compressor operation well  into the steady state surge range is
possible.

Engine Improvement - Low Cost Turbine  Wheel Manufacturing;  Sample Baseline
compressor turbine wheels are currently being cast from a proprietary Garrett
Corporation reusable pattern process.  Progress by Pratt-Whitney on their
superplastic forging process is reported in Section  III-E.

Engine Improvement - Torque Converter  Lock-up:  Preliminary evaluation  (Figs.
27 and 28) indicates no fuel economy improvement on  drive cycles.  However,
engine braking  improvement is noticeable and  the improved performance could be
translated into a proportionately smaller base engine design.

Engine Improvement - Linerless  Insulation:  Both Foseco and Chrysler propri-
etary materials are being evaluated on the Program endurance  engine  (Fig. 29).
To date,  the materials have been  tested  for over 300 hour? with no significant
deterioration.  In addition to  life and  performance, a prime  objective  of this
task is an assessment of possible high volume cost advantages.

Engine Improvement - Variable  Inlet Guide Vanea:  The purpose of variable inlet
guide vanes (VIGV) is to improve fuel  economy by:
          • power augmentation  at  1007,, speed  and
          # lower operating-line  flows at 50% speed.

At 100"/. speed  (Fig. 30),  the VIGV deflects  the  inlet flow opposite engine
rotation  to increase compressor pressure ratio and  flow which increases
engine power.   This augmentation  allows  for  the design of a basically  smaller
engine, which  improves fuel economy  in the driving  range  (507o-707.  Ngg).
                                       -52-

-------
                                                               T8  =  1300/85
       Compressor Map;
        Assembly 284
                                               A-128-1  PP 106-401  AF
                                                     Constant  T8  =  1300/85

                                             x	x 1  Sec.  Accel.

                                            D— —D 4 Sec.  Accel.
                                             No surge was  experienced
                                             during the accelerations.
                                       Airflow,  Lb/Se
J.OO
                                                    2.20
2.60
 Fig. 26   Variation of Engine Operating Line with Acceleration Time
                                   -53-

-------
                INPUT
                               n
                                    L
                                            F.W.
                                           OUTPUT
                   -B4.M LOCK-UP
                    TORQUE  CONVERTER
LOCK-UP T/C
CDNTPOL. VALVE-- i  rq
l.
-------
                            Lock-Up  at        Standard
                             1-2 Shift        (6% Slip)
 Economy
   FDC                        8.1  MPG         8.1 MPG
   FEC                       13.0 MPG        13.0 MPG
   20-80 MPH
   Steady State, Avg.        13.0 MPG        12.5 MPG

 Emissions
   NOx                      10-15% Red.        Base

 Performance
   0-30                        4.3              k.3
   0-60                       11.7             12.1
  50-70                        7.1              7.6
Fig. 28   Torque Converter Lock-Up Evaluation (Preliminary Results)
                           -55-

-------
                                                             -m.-J-U Y/ i<"-$
Fig.  29   Endurance Engine  with Linerless Insulation

-------
-.1
I
           o
           • r~
           tJ
           nj
           OS


           0)
           i_
           3
                    VIGV Travel
+60° VIGV      0° VIGV
                                      Present  Operating  Line


                               	  Change to Operating
                                      Line
                                           Corr Flow
                     Fig. 30   Changes In Engine Operating Line on Compressor Map With VIGV Application

-------
At 507. spesd (Fig. 30), engine power levels In the driving range (between
30 mph and idle) are currently achieved by reduction ia turbine inlet tempera-
ture.  Improvement in fuel economy and better emissions control could be
obtained if the turbine inlet temperature could be maintained at a high level,
while compressor flow and pressure ratio are reduced.  This can be accomplished
by using the VIGV to deflect the flow in the direction of engine rotation.
The amount of VIGV actuation would depend on the power level needed at any
given point in the 30 mph to idle driving range.

Variable inlet guide vanes were adapted to the Baseline compressor (Fig. 31)
and evaluated on a compressor test rig (Figs. 32, 33, and 34).  The Baseline
compressor rotor consists of the familiar integral inducer/impeller combina-
tion and an additional separate inducer.  Tests were conducted with and without
the separate inducer.  The purpose of the separate induCer is to provide a
wide range of stall-free flow between 50% and 100% speed for a fixed geometry
compressor.  It seemed possible that the use of VIGV might preclude the need
for a separate inducer.

Test results showed that, at 507. speed, the low inlet blade angle of the
integral inducer provides 3 points higher efficiency at 60° of VIGV deflection
angl° than the high inlet blade angle of the separate inducer (Figs. 35-38).
At 100% speed and -30° of VIGV deflection angle, the separate inducer provides
67. change of flow and pressure racio, while the integral inducer provides only
2%.

Thus, the test results show that the VIGV can perform as intended with a
properly matched inducer.  The goal now is to obtain a single angle which will
provide the best compromise of optimum fuel economy between high-speed and
low-speed operation.

Upgraded Engine Design:  The goals of the Upgraded Engine Program are to pro-
vide much better fuel economy while meeting the original 1976 emission standards
in an otherwise satisfactory automotive powerplant.  This can be accomplished
with a 100 hp basic Upgraded design using augmentation to 122 hp for vehicle
acceleration.  Installation of this engine (Fig. 39) in a compact vehicle
                                       -58-

-------
              SECTION A-A
•I-THERMOCOUPLE RAKE
 I-TOTAL PRESSURE RAKE
 8 ELEMENTS IN EACH RAKE'
                                         THERMOCOUPLES
                                         3 ROWS
                                         4 ELEMENTS EACH
                                     /innnnnnn
-TOTAL PRESSURE RAKES
  3 ROWS
  8 ELEMENTS  EACH
                                           FIXED VANE -
                            Fig. 31   Instrumentation of Baseline Engine Compressor Test  Rig with
                                     Variable Inlet Guide Vanes
      PROXIMTY
      PROBE

-------
Fig. 32   Baseline Engine Variable- Inlet Guide Vane Assembly With
          Actoator and Guide Vane Angle Calibration Fixture

                            -60-

-------
Fig. 33   Baseline Engine Compressor Test Rig Compressor t* Diffuser
          Assembly with Impeller Discharge Total Pressure Probes
                               -61-

-------
          cr-
          N)
/if
                                          Fig. 34  Baseline Engine Compressor Test Rig with Simulated Car

                                                   Inlet System and With Actuator For VIGV'S

-------
        OlfFUSER
        ««!fil  Cl
         in* NOJZtf
             F.NC.US
            NO.
        TIREF )
  287-VtGV P«£l iNt-VfiNE  iN&Lt AT Zl*0 DEC * ««0 MB.
  3-10-14
                    07  iSHORT SHROUDi
                 IN..2
                            N3  V
                0.  TMflOfiT Olfl-
                  E

                  RX[BLI-6«SEt INC

4t?iC WH

S5'F     5TRT !C-70Tftl.  RPTIN'Q
                                                 ASSEMBLE 2SJt-A926 COMPRESSOR
                                           ;	   BASELINE-AXIAL INLET SttTEM.
                                           I      NO GUIDE VANES.
                      THRUST BEAAINO FAILURE'* ^J* SURGE WIHT •
        SURGE LIKE
           0 DEO.
   SURCE LINE    :
     *60 DEC.
                                                         .• OC    : 2i    .' 40
"0.03     C r»    0 SO    0 IS    I .03
                                  CORK  SIR  FLU^-l B/:.t C.
                      Fig.  35   Compressor Stage  Performance
                                     -63-

-------
 .80
.70
      u
      c
.60   «   -
      o

      el
      <*-
.50
      2.6





      2.4   -





      2.2  —
 o:


 £  1.8

1.6





1.4





1.2





i . o
               o°  IGV  o 50%

               60°  IGV 0 60% NGG

               15°  IGV G70% NGG
                                                         70%
                .6   .7   .8    .9    1.0  1.1   1.2  1.3  1.4   1.5
                                 -        _ Lbs/Sec
                    Fig.  36   B-36 Compressor with VIGV


                               -64-

-------
   .80 -•
   .70 "•
o
c
V
•5s -60
   .50 ••
   .80
                                               0  Guide Vane Angle
O 8-36 Compressor

D B-52 Compressor
                  Rotational Speed, %-50
                                                   60  Guide Vane Angle
        5    .6    .7   .8   .9    i.O   1.1   1.2   1.3   I.H  1.5
                             Airflow- 2J2 -Lbs/Sec
                                       o

         Fig. 37   Performance Comparison of B-52 and B-36 Compressors With
                  Variable Inlet Guide Vanes
                                 -65-

-------
   4.0
   3.9
ID

«  3.8
3
Wl
I/)
I-
a.
3.7 . .


3.6 ..


3-5
                          Goal
                    LATERAL  INLET
                                               0-0°  Vane Angl
                                               A - 30° Vane
                                                Angle
                                                    AXIAL  INLET
       2.2
 i
2.3
                                Airflow -
                                     2.5

                                       W/3"
   2.2


- Lbs/Sec
                                                               2.3
2.5
2.6
                  Fig.  38   B-36 Compressor Performance with VIGV at 100% Speed with
                           Laterial and  Axial Inlets
                                    1

-------
Fig. 39   92 K.W. (123 HP) Upgraded Engine for Compact Vehicle
          Horizontal Cross Section

-------
engine compartment (Fig. 40) requires no major vehicle modifications.  The
accessory drive system (Fig. 41) is of the free rotor concept whereby both
engine and vehicle accessories are driven from the power turbine.

Predicted low speed fuel consumption for the Upgraded Engine in a compact
vehicle is about 50% less than that for the Baseline Engine in an intermediate
size vehicle (Figs. 42 and 43).  This improvement is due to three major factors.
Improvement in component efficiencies (Fig. 44) account for 15% of the total.
Reduction of internal leakages account for 8%, and reducing the engine and
vehicle size accounts for the remaining 18%.

Questions and Comments
Question:  Two materials (Foseco and a Chrysler proprietary material) are
     being evaluated for the linerless insulation.  Does this not constitute
     a vendor comparison?
Answer;  The prime concern  is to assess the true potential engine cost with
     the linerless insulation, particularly since the high cost and complication
     of the metal  liner is  recognized.  Production is still too far off to
     begin to limit potential vendors; all likely avenues are being considered.

Question:  What is the life of the current graphite ceramic regenerator seals?
Answer:  It depends on the  running temperature.  Present rig tests are limited
     to about 1200°F which gives 20-30 hours  (50 hours maximum) of life for a
     set of seals  - almost unsuitable except for very limited testing at
     light load, low torque operation.  The hot cross arm seals are critical.

Question;  What seals are used in the Baseline Engine?
Answer:  The Baseline Engine uses a metallic regenerator and a Chrysler pro-
     prietary seal.  The cross ana seal is a sprayed metal seal of proprietary
     composition.  This gives excellent, full engine life and has many thou-
     sands of hours of operation.  However, the trend is to higher cycle
     temperatures  for the Upgraded Engine; hence it is believed that ceramic
     regenerators will be necessary.  The seals for metallic regenerators are
     inappropriate, and so different seals must be developed.
                                      -68-

-------
Fig. 40   91 K.W. (123 HP) Upgraded Engine with Single Ceramic
          Regenerator Tilted 20° Compact Vehicle Installation

-------
               GAS GENERATOR-;
               ROTOR        /


                            A
                                                   5.00ORPM
POWER TURBINE
ROTOR
                                                                               • •, */C COMPRESSOR.
                                                                                \BELT  DRIVE
                                                                              , POWER STEERING
                                                                              I i ALTERNATOR
                                                                            ^  BELT DRIVE
                                 OVER
                                 RUNNING
                                 CLUTCH
                                 3800
REGENERATOR
(TILTED 20°)
   31  RPM
                   Fig. 41  Gear Schematic  for Upgraded Gas Turbine
                                     (Preliminary)

-------
   32
   28
0)
3
0)
c/l
O
O
fO



a.

o

2
   20
   16
   12
    8
                                         "Upgraded"
                                       Compact  Vehicle
                                "Baseline"
                           Intermediate Vehicle
       20
                                 50      60

                          Miles  Per  Hour
              Fig. 42  Road Load Fuel Economy
                        -71-

-------
I
o
u.
co
CO
c
•r-
Z
   2.0
   1.6
   1.2
    ,
.6
                                                        Baseline  Engine
Upgraded Engin
                       8   10  12    16   20             40

                                          Output Horsepower
                                                              60    80   100  120   160  200
                                    Fig. 43  Engine Characterization

-------
.6k
     0
.if         .6
 Relative  Output
   .8
Power
1.0
              Fig.  44   Component Efficiency Comparison
                                -73-

-------
Question;  What Is the goal In cycle temperatures?
Answer:  There Is no real limit; once the regenerator limitation Is overcome
     the turbine wheel temperature will be limiting.  Nominally, the higher the
     cycle temperature the higher the specific output of the engine, the
     better the engine package and the higher the fuel economy.  Present regen-
     erator temperature is limited to 1350°F; <.he Upgraded Engine is designed
     for 1400°F.  If the rest of the engine would allow it, temperatures
     would be pushed even higher.
Comment:  Although NOx is the most difficult pollutant to eliminate in the
     gas turbine, it is emphasized that all of the pollutants  (unburncd hydro-
     carbon, carbon monoxide and oxides of nitrogen) must be reduced.  There
     are still important variations in test results due to test systems as
     indicated in tests 3A and 3B and 5A and SB  in Fig. 22.  For the most
     promising burner (proprietary burner of Chrysler's) the 507. speed CO
     levels are down to about 100 ppm.

Question:  Has the burner development emission test cycle used by Chrysler for
     burner development test results been correlated with test results from a
     vehicle running the actual Federal Driving  Cycle?
Answer:  Then has been only very limited testing of burner? on both test
     cycles; it  is believed to be premature to try to establish a detailed
     correlation a.'c this time.  However, the general results and trends of
     one cycle seem to be reflected in the results of the other cycle.

Question:  It was stated that reduction of emission "spikes" during the
     transients will require close coordination  of both burner design and the
     control system.  Does  this Imply that Chrysler's proprietary burner has
     variable geometry?
Anawer:  It Is not appropriate  to discuss that point at this time.
Comment:   The Chrysler proprietary burner gives  somewhat better emission
     results on gasoline  (mainly NOx) than on diesel fuel, but efforts con-
     tinue to get  low NOx on diesel fuel.
                                       -74-

-------
Question (Dr.  Bucheim, Volkswagen):  Does the endurance teat cycle include
     both high and low load operation?
Answer:   The endurance cycle is more severe than actual road operation.  It
     includes, in addition to both high and lou load operation, numerous
     transients of rapid acceleration and deceleration, and shut down for
     maximum soak back.

Question (Dr.  Bucheim, Volkswagen):  What background emission levels have been
     experienced in testing?
Answer:   Background emissions have been running 1-2 ppm of Hexane with 6-12 ppm
     Carbon - moderately high ambient levels.  Corrections are made for these
     to approach the Standards.   In some  instances emissions lower than ambient
     levels are measured indicating very  low or close  to zero emissions from
     the engine.  These low  levels correlate with probe measurements made in
     various parts of  the burner.

Question (Arthur Underwood,  Consultant):  Just as emphasis seems to have shifted
     from emissions to fuel  economy,  it appears that the need for NOx levels ae
     low as 0.4 grams/mile may  not really be necessary.  What is EPA doing to
     raise  the value  for the NOx  Standard quickly, so  that less time and
     money will be wasted meeting unnecessarily low NOx Standards?
Answer;  The AAPS Division works  toward satisfying the Standards set by other
     groups.  The program  is fonred  to satisfy  these requirements.  When the
     requirements change,  the program will  be modified accordingly.

Question (Dr. J. E. Davoud,  D-Cycle  Power Systems):  In this presentation the
     approach to reducing NOx seems  to have been mutually exclusive of effort
     to increase cycle temperature and fuel economy.   Also,  the probleu is
     being  approached from predominantly  an engineering basis.  Has any atten-
     tion been given  to the  basic chemical  and more scientific approach such
     as determining activation  energy cf  NOx, etc?
Answer:  The general  approach to  NOx  reduction  is with lean  combustion, par-
     ticularly in the primary zone because  the  turbine operates on an overall
     lean fuel-air ratio.   Increasing the cycle temperature  helps because  it
                                      -75-

-------
     extends  Che  lean  limit;  combustion temperature  can be  reduced with
     increased cycle temperature.   Significant NOx formation starts above
     3000°F;  however,  depending on the burner configuration, residence time,
     etc.,  significant NOx can begin to form above 2600 to  2700°F.  Some of
     the earlier  AAPS programs on combustion supplied fundamental guidance for
     the current  engineering developments.   Practical hardware development
     certainly  requires a combined scientific-engineering approach.

Question:  Is there a  design using inlet guide vanes which  will satisfy the
     extremes of  operating conditions and,  if the IGV's replace the variable
     power turbine nozzles, what happens to the dynamic braking capability?
     What is  the  resulting net gain or loss in efficiency?
Answer:   Based  on the  compressor tests to date, it does appear chat a practical
     design over  the operating range of the engine is achievable using 'ICV's.
     The net  gain in  fuel economy over the driving cycle has not yet  been
     determined.   At  the outset of the IGV investigation it was recognized
     that an  alternate teans of dynamic braking would be required.   Several
     potential  alternates were identified,  but have  not yet been investigated.

Question (Homer Wood,  H. G. Wood and Associates): The compressor efficiency
     levels seem  to be low relative to the state-of-the-art of s few  yesre ago.
     Is this  because of the low specific speed?  If  so, the optimization  pro-
     cess with  IGV's will have to be repeated when Che specific speed is
     raised to  get higher efficiencies.
Answer:   The  specific  speeds are not that low, but performance is based on
     outlet static/inlet total measurements and the  discharge is diffused
     down to  about 0.05 Hach Number in the regenerator (compared to aircraft
     practice of  about 0.2 Mach Number Into the burner).  The higher diffusion
     and perhaps  a less efficient whfcl cause lower  efficiency.  There are •
     number of  detailed aerodynamic improvements which can  be made in the
     compressor design.

Question (Prof. W. Hryniszak. Clarke Chapman):  What is a reasonable  compressor
     efficiency to expect for the future production  compressors in thl«  size
     range?  It seems  the value varies froa a "mystic" 851  to a "realistic" 751.
                                      -76-

-------
Answer;   A concise answer is not possible since there must be a compromise
     between full power,  where very little operation is required, and part
     power, where most of the operation takes place (50 to 757. gas generator
     speed).  Compromises involve specific speed, running clearances on front
     face (0.010 inch at  rated speed; larger at lower speed rather than 0.003
     inch), low speed pressure ratio with ability to accelerate to high pres-
     sure ratio.  It was  also pointed out that the current program (scheduled
     to conclude in 1975) is a stepping stone, and an advanced program aided
     perhaps at 1979 (with much more ambitious fuel economy targets), might be
     expected to have an  entirely different engine concept and configuration.

Question (Peter Ualzer, Volkswagen):  Is it not better to design for a larger
     surge margin and sacrifice efficiency, so that higher temperatures can
     be used for part load operation?
Answer;   Consideration is presently being given to backward swept compressor
     blades, so that maximum efficiency can be achieved without sacrificing
     surge margin.

Question:  What fuel is used for the fuel economy projections?  What is vehicle
     weight?  What is projected acceleration time of the engine from idle to
     oaxitaum?
Answer;   Diesel fuel is used; the test weight of the vehicle is 3500 pounds.
     The engine acceleration is competitive.  In the compact vehicle with
     augmentation (122 hp) 0-60 mph  is 13 seconds.  It is also expected to
     test the Upgraded Eugine in the intermediate sized vehicle.

Question;   Is there any rough idea of the production cost of the Upgraded
     Engine compared to the Baseline Engine and the conventional piston engine?
Anawer;   No numbers are presently available, but ultimately it roust be competi-
     tive.  At present, because of Increased cooplcxlty,lt will cost were.
     Prime objectives of  the current program are low etel»slons and high fuel
     economy.  Obviously  a lot remains to be done to reduce production cost
     and optimize performance.
                                       •77-

-------
Question;   What are the metal temperatures on the gas generator and power
     turbine wheels?
Answer:   Under steady state conditions the nozzle temperature  is very close to
     the gas temperature.  The wheel temperature is about 200°F lower than gas
     temperature.  The Chrysler quarterly report will contain  these values.

Question;   Is the accessibility of the regenerator satisfactory from a
     maintenance viewpoint?
 t'i> '
Answer;  The Upgraded Engine configuration  (Figs. 39 and 40) is very satis-
     factory.  Ultimately, it is hoped that  the regenerator core and the seals
     will not have to be repaired or replaced.

Question:   How would engine packaging change for different vehicle restrictions?
     What about rear engine mounting?
Answer;  The present engine configuration seems well suited for both Inter-
     ned late and compact vehicles.   It circumvents many problems encountered
     in previous vehicle installations getting the large exhaust ducts out and
     interference with the steering  column and gear.  No consideration has
     been given to rear mounted engines  or vehicles of different configuration.
     The single regenerator results  in a narrower engine.

Question:   How is an 18% improvement in  fuel economy obtained  by reducing
     engine size?  It is generally believed  that the efficiency of an engine
     decreases with reduction in site.
Answer:  In the vehicle application  tho  18%  improvement in fuel economy, due
     to reduced engine size, is attributed to:  (I) engine operates at higher
     specific power (fuel rate at 707. rated  power is lower than at 5C7, power),
     (2) power augmentation due to water injection (increases  mass flow through
     turbine without exceeding temperature  limits), and (3) the weight of  the
     vehicle is lower (switch from standard  to compact car).
                                      -78-

-------
Question (Dr.  J.  E.  Davoud, D-Cycle Power):  Carter Enterprises, Inc. has
     been demonstrating and riding people in their steam car here at the
     conference.   Will information on this privately funded development be
     presented at the meeting?
Answer:  The information ar.d data on this car have not yet been fully processed
     for presentation.

BA,   .Baseline Engine Project Support, by D. Paeke, NASA. Lewis Research Center
This is a brief overview of the status of NASA efforts to support EPA's
successful demonstration of a gas turbine-powered vehicle.

NASA's major areas of effort are in providing aerodynamic designs for the
three rotating components of the Upgraded Engine  (including their gas flow
paths), component testing, and work on selected advanced technology.

In the October, 1973 meeting Mr. Hal Rohlik presented preliminary NASA design
data on the two turbines and compressor for the 120 hp Upgraded Engine.  Since
that meeting, EPA hcs redirected the program to the intermediate vehicle size
and correspondingly reduced the engine size to 100 hp.  New aerodynamic designs
for the smaller engine are now being coordinated with Chrysler to verify their
physical compatibility with the Upgraded Engine mechanical design constraints.

Instrumentation and installation of the ambient air aerodynamic test rigs at
Lewis are proceeding on schedule.  These will be employed to obtain detail
performance maps of each of the engine aerodynamic components.

The gas turbine engine test facility and data acquisition system are now fully
operational.  A complete performance map of the Baseline Engine has been
obtained and the data are  in general agretment with earlier Chrysler data.
Currently attention is focused on an experimental investigation to determine
the sources of major engine heat losses.  Some of these should be recoverable.

In the areas of new technology NASA combustion specialists have initiated an
R&D effort on low-emission catalytic combustors.  Promising catalytic substrates
                                       -79-

-------
will be  procured from industry and integrated with in-house cotnbustor designs
using  fuel/air premix and prevaporization features.  Both fixed and variable
geometry configurations will be investigated.

In another area, using a NASA-developed Strainrange Partitioning analysis,
the low-cycle fatigue behavior of several automotive turbine alloys will be
experimentally determined.  The results of these tests will provide a rational
basis  for alloy selection.  When the test results are used in conjunction with
the stress/strain/thermal analysis, the expected thermal fatigue life of the
integral turbine disc and blades may be calculated.  It is planned to test
AF2-IDA and P.A. 101 alloys over a range of cycle-to-failure, time-to-failure,
temperature, strainrange, and cycle wave shape.  Two publications on these
techniques are frcjn ASTM Special Technology Publication No. 520, 1973:
          • "Tenperature Effects on the Strainrange Partitioning Approach
            for Creep Fatigue Analysis"
          • "The Challenge to Unified Treatment of High Temperature Fatigue -
            A Partisan Proposal Based on Strainrange Partitioning"

The remainder of the NASA portion of this report summarizes the work to date
on the part load performance of the 120 hp Upgraded Engine (before recent EPA
redirections to the 100 hp engine for the compact and intermediate vehicle
size).  This is of prin.e importance because  the vehicle will be operating under
part-load conditions during most of its useful life.

An existing NASA jet engine performance computer program was modified to  reflect
a two-shaft automotive engine configuration as shown schematically in Fig. 45.
The modified program can provide:
          • Component matching; i.e., with given component maps the perforoiance
            of the system can be defined; or with given system design or  per-
            formance, the individual component maps can be defined.
          • Off-design performance can br; computed.
          • Simulation can be incorporated for variations in:  aerodynamics, com-
            bustors, heat exchangers, bleed  flows, thermal losses, and
            pressure drops.
                                       -80-

-------
    HEAT RECOVERY
    LOW SPD. COMP. REMOVAL-*-
00
»--
I
                                         GENENG
                                     (2 SPOOL VERSION)
MODIFICATIONS
                                      AUTO ENG.
 SHAFT POWER
 EXTRACTION
(LO & HI SPEED TURBINES)
                                        Figure 45

-------
Figure 46  is  a schematic of the engine showing how the program is set up to
account for these various factors.  This very closely models the Baseline and
Upgraded Engines.

Compressor and turbine maps are shown in Figs. 47 and 48.  The corresponding
SFC curve  over the load range is shown in Fig. 49 and is also compared with
Baseline Engine test results.

The series of three curves (Figs. 50, 51, and 52) show the effect of various
match point criteria and that a gear change (Fig. 52) can produce a better
match over the load range without an undue sacrifice in SFC and without exceed-
ing the creep stress limit.

This type  of investigation is now being repeated for the 100 hp Upgraded
Engine in accordance with EPA's redirection of the program to the compact
vehicle.

As reflected by  the above material, major emphasis has been on the short term
support of the AAPS Program particularly on aerodynamics and heat loss areas
for the Upgraded Engine.  However, it should be mentioned that discussions are
in progress between NASA and EPA on a longer range, technology oriented gas
turbine program.

Questions  and Cotnmer.ts
Question (C. Amann, General Motors Technical Center):  On the compressor map,
     maximum efficiency islands are well removed from the surge limit.  This
      is not typical of radial bladed compressors.  Does  it mean that backward
     swept blades are being used?  If so, what effect does polar moment of inertia
     have on angular acceleration?  Also, on the turbine map  (Fig. 48) it
     appears that the operating line is removed off of maximum efficiency
     by about 1% points.  Why is  this?
Answer:  Backward swept blades are not being used.  Although efficiency levels
     are about as expected at design, these are calculated off-design  results.
     It is expected that the tests of the actual engine will show the  maximum
     efficiency lines will be closer to the surge limit.
                                      -82-

-------
   EXH.
00
      IMF.  -
HEAT RECOVERY
     A P.ISEALS
                                                    COMB.
                                               X

                                                                HP
                                                                         >BUED. POINTS
                               Fig. ^6   Gas Turbine Engine Model Schematic

-------
«n
M
^
    a
.4       .6
10
                                                                                      1.8
                        Fig. 47    Radial Compressor 120 HP Upgraded Engine

-------
              .4   .(   .«  l.o  13  I*  I.C  1.8 2.0 ?.
JBt
  Fig.  
-------
1.4
1.2
1.0
 .8
 .6
                             NASA BASELINE TESTS
                    I20*hp UPGRADED DESIGN
           20   .   40     60      80      100      120
                              ENGINE HORSEPOWER
140     160
           Fig. 49   SFC Versus Power 2-Spool Automotive G.T.
                             -86-

-------
UJ
v»
on
o
120

100


80



50




40



30




20




14



10.


8
                   MINIMUM SFC
                 OPERATING LINE
              NGG
     I      1.5
                                                      CREEP STRESS
                                              ROAD LOAD LINE
                         	/	30MPH
                                           5   6   ?  8    10
             Fig. 50    120 HP Upgraded Engine Low Sp^ed Match



                              -87-

-------
o
a.
UJ
120


100



 80




 60






  40





  30






  20





  14





  10



   8




   6
                           \m
                    MINIMUM S.F.C,

                    OPERATING LINE
                                  ^CREEP STRESS

                                 K^LIMIT
                                               ROAD LOAD LINE
               SFC PENALTY
                      	£— t	30MPH
1.5
                                  4    5   6  7  8

                                  RPM)
                                                         10
         Fig. 51   120 HP Upgraded Engine Creep Stress Limit Match




                              -88-

-------
2
LU
oo
fie.
o
X
120


100


 80



 60





  .40



  30





-  20




  14




  10


   8
                        NGG • too*
                 ROAD LOAD
                                               MINIMUM SFC
                                               OPERATING  LINE
                                                 GEAR CHANGE
--  4QMPH
                            _ /_   30 MPH
                1.5    2        3    4     5   6   7  8   IQ

                        Npn0.dO.000.RPM)
             Fig. 52  120 HP Upgraded Engine with Gear Change
                             -89-

-------
     Concerning the turbine performance, in upgrading the turbine there were
     some residual constraints, believed to be stress in the case from the
     earlier design, which had to be satisfied.  Hence, the operating line is
     not on the maximum efficiency line.

C.   Baseline Vehicle Tests to Date - EPA, by Anthony Earth. Emission Control
     Technology Division
Because the gas turbine exhaust flow far exceeds the capacity of the standard
emission measuring equipment used for piston engines and because the concen-
tration of pollutants is much  smaller,  new procedures for  testing turbine
vehicles must be developed.

The approach is to use the dynamometer  room as the constant volume as in the
standard CVS method of testing emissions.  The flow into the room is sampled
to get the background or ambient emission level; the room outflow is sampled
to determine engine emission level.  The outflow i~ restricted to 5500 cfm.

The vehicle is run over the Federal Driving Cycle sampling continuously in the
standard way.  To calibrate the air flow, a known mass of propane is injected
into the room and the mixture  sampled before and after the tests.  Because of
the large size of the room and the inherent cleanliness of this type of engine,
the concentration of pollutants is very low; so care and some improvements in
techniques are required.

Only a limited number of tests have been run to date.  CO  levels of 3.5 grams
per mile, NOx levels of 2.7 grams per mile, and a fuel economy of 7.3 miles
per gallon have been measured  over the  Federal Driving Cycle.  These should
be corrected to account for a higher temperature in the room after the test
than before the test.  This will result in less than a 5% change (decrease in
emission levels and increase in fuel economy).

Questions and Comments:  None
                                       -90-

-------
 D.    Low Cost  Integrated Control  for  Baseline  Gas  Turbine  Program,  by  Leon
      Lewis, AiResearch
 AiResearch has been working  since last November with Chrysler Corporation to
 develop a  low  cost integrated  control system for the Upgraded Gas  Turbine
 Engine.  The latest Program  Plan, reflecting recent modifications  to include
, two additional sets of  equipment,, ,is  s^own in Fig.  53.   Emphasis  to date  has
 been on analysis  of the Baseline  Engine characteristics and simulation studies
 for the Upgraded  Engine along  with the design and fabrication of  the first
 Preprototype system.  The  program status is as follows:
           • Analytical  tcols have been established.
           • Preliminary engine tests  of fuel metering system completed.
           • First Preprototype control system in final stages of  integration
             testing at  AiReseprch; delivery to Chrysler scheduled before  end
            of May.
           •  Second and  third Preprototype control systems  in advanced  stage of
             construction.
           • Design concepts  established for development of Prototype control.

 Engine, simulation, a  joint effort by Chrysler and AiResearch, is  based on the
 notation  shown in Fig.  54 and  the following simulation input data:
           •  Compressor  maps  (including variable I.G.V.)
           •  Heat exchanger maps
           •  Combustor functions
           •  Turbine maps (including variable nozzle)
           •  Flow leaks  (one of the more difficult elements to allocate)
           •  Keat leaks  (one of the more difficult elements to allocate)
           •  Drive train characteristics
           •  Vehicle  road load  and accessories.
           • Water injection

 The simulation model  can then be used to produce steady state and  transient
 solutions  on the behavior of the engine and be used for:
                                       -91-

-------
I
vC
SO
I


BASELINE ENGINE SIMULATION MODEL
CONSTRUCT PROGRAM 	
BASELINE ENGINE EVALUATION
SIMULATION STUDIES FOR
UPGRADED ENGINE
PREPROTOTYPE SYSTEM NO. 1
DESIGN. FAB AND TEST
PREPROTOTYPE SYSTEM NO. 2
DESIGN, FAB AND TEST

PREPROTOTYPE SYSTEM NO. 3
DESIGN, FAB AND TEbT
ENGINE/VEHICLE TESTING
DEVELOPMENT PROTOTYPE SYSTEM
ANALYSIS DESIGN AND TEST
UPGRADED ENGINE CONTROL
DEFINE CONTROL CONCEPT
PRODUCTION PROTOTYPE SYSTEM
ANALYSIS AND DESIGN


N

•••



















D

_i



















J

k



















F





















M





















A


A



A














M


i



L













19
J




















74
J





















A








t


i









S





















O





















N














,






D














>





1
J





















F










»i









'19
M




















75
A
















/




M





















J














,



j

                               Fig.  53   Integrated Engine Control System Program Plan

-------
 INLET
 .PLENUM
AMBIENT

  I V   RECUPERATOR

   V^
                2  3
                      HOT PASS
                     COLD PASS
                                 COMBUSTOR
        COMPRESSOR
STATION
  NO.
               DESCRIPTION
1	COMPRESSOR INLET

2	COMPRESSOR OUTLET

3	REGENERATOR COLD SIDE INLET

4	REGENERATOR COLD SIDE OUTLET

5	COMPRESSOR TURBINE INLET
                                                 VARIABLE
                                                 POWER
                                                 TURBINE
                                                 NOZZLES
                                       GAS GENERATOR
                                       TURBINE
                                                             POWER
                                                             TURBINE
                                          6 _ _ _ COMPRESSOR TURBINE OUTLET

                                          6.3	 POWER TURBINE NOZZLE INLET

                                          7	POWER TURBINE OUTLET

                                          8	REGENERATOR HOT SIDE INLET

                                          9	REGENERATOR HOT SIDE OUTLET
                     Fig. 54  Chrysler Engine Ration Notation

-------
          • Steady-state control requirement definition
          • Transient control requirement definition
          • Control concept tradeoff studies
          • Control system sensor selection
          • Control system failure mode analysis

A comparison of model results and engine test data in Fig.  55 show the accuracy
of the simulation.   Some further improvements are still being Incorporated.

Thus, the achievements to date are:
          • Model is operational in both steady-state and transient modes.
          • Preprototype control system defined and evaluated on model.
          • Model transient accuracy verified by preliminary e.igine tests at
            Chrysler.

A functional diagram of the Preprototype integrated control system is shown  in
Fig. 56.  A table of corresponding symbols is in Fig. 57.  All possible options
which might be required are included for evaluation.  From this point on, the
intent is to reduce and simplify the number and complexity of the system
elements.

Figure 58 shows one of the electronic modules which is typical of the mini-
computers used for each of the functions shown.  Features of the fuel system
computer are:
          • Gas Generator Range Governor
                 — Idle power augmentation
                 — Maximum power computation
          • Acceleracion Fuel Schedule
                 — Hot restart limiting
                 — T^ limiting
                 — Miniaium acceleration fuel
          • Deceleration Fuel Schedule
          • Alternate Fuel System Deceleration Shut-Off
          • Max. Gas Generator Speed Control with Start/Park Limiting
          • Power Turbine Overspeed Governor
                                      -94-

-------
   GAS
   GENERATOR
   SPEED
TURBINE INLET
TEMPERATURE
    FUEL FLOW
                                      ENGINE TEST
                                   MODEL RESULTS
                                      _ ENGINE TEST
                                      1   MODEL
                                         RESULTS
                              0.5     1.0     1.5
                                TIME, SECONDS
     Fig. 55   Comparison of Model Results with Engine Test Data
             (Acceleration From 50% Ngg to 100% Ngg)
                          -95-

-------
                a
               8
               N,
        W4
          T8-
           7-
         99
                        FUEL
                       SYSTEM
                      COMPUTER
 NOZZLE
  ANGLE
COMPUTER
   NOZZLE
   ACTUATOR
IGV
ANGLE
COMPUTER



IGV
ACTUATOR

COMBUSTOR

COMPUTER
0
    ACTUATOR
WATER INJEC-
TION CONTROL


SOLENOID
VALVE
           START-
      START/PAR K-
        OILPRES.-
             N
              os
   START
 SEQUENCE
    AND
  ENGINE
                      COMPUTER
  .  FUELSHUTOFF
    VALVE

 _FUEL DELIVERY
    SYSTEM

 __ STARTER
    SOLENOID

 __ INDICATOR
    LIGHTS
Fig. 56  Simplified Functional Diagram Preprototype Integrated Control System


                           -96-

-------
T5     GAS GENERATOR TURBINE INLET TEMPERATURE



T8     LOW PRESSURE REGENERATOR INLET TEMPERATURE



Ta     AMBIENT TEMPERATURE



Pa     AMBIENT PRESSURE



N'      GAS GENERATOR SHAFT SPEED
 JS



N

       CORRECTED GAS GENERATOR SPEED
 5      AMBIENT PRESSURE CORRECTION. = -1
 6     AMBIENT TEMPERATURE CORRECTION, =     ~





NOJ    OUTPUT SHAFT SPEED



 tt     THROTTLE PEDAL POSITION



 0     POWER TURBINE NOZZLE ANGLE POSITION



 X     INLET GUIDE VANE ANGLE POSITION



 0     VARIABLE GEOMETRY BURNER POSITION



Wf     FUEL FLOW IN POUNDS PER HOUR
          Fig. 57  Table of Symbols
                      -97-

-------
CO
I
    NOZZLE
    CONTROL
    REFERENCE
    POTENTIOMETERS
    FUEL CONTROL
    REFERENCE
    POTENTIOMETERS
T5 NOZZLE (£


T8

IDLE
T8


IDLE
                                     INDICATING LOGIC
                                     AND DRIVERS
                                   START SEQUENCE AND
                                   ENGINE PROTECTION
                                       FUEL SYSTEM
                                       COMPUTER
                                       FUEL SYSTEM
                                       DRIVER
                NOZZLE CONTROL
                AND DRIVER
                                      SIGNAL
                                      CONDITIONERS
                                      POWER SUPPLY
                                          LOW-LEVEL
                                          SIGNALS
                                                              POWER AND HIGH
                                                              LEVEL SIGNALS
                                                           INPUT/OUTPUT
                                                           CONNECTORS
                            Fig. 58  Electronic Control ler, First Preprctotype Control

-------
The nozzle control computer incorporates the following:
          • Nozzle braking logic
          • Tg temperature control in power mode and braking mode
          • Idle and low speed power turbine governing
          • Power turbine overspeed control
          • Tj temperature control

The nozzle trim actuator is shown installed on the engine in Fig. 59.  The
nozzle trim actuator:
          • Provides trim function by operating in series with Chrysler
            nozzle actuator
          • Powered by 50 to 100 psi fluid pressure from the turbine
            lubrication system
          * Responds to signals from integrated gas turbine system controller
          • Designed for full stroke against operating load in 0.10 seconds?
          • Frequency response flat to three cps
          • Thirty thousand cycles cf endurance testing complete prior to
            delivery of first unit
          • First unit shipped March 26, 1974

The Prototype nozzle actuator is in development (Fig. 60).  It provides power
modulation, braking function, and braking modulation  as well as power modula-
tion velocity and braking velocity additive for maximum response.  Componei.c
development tests have started; design is scheduled for completion June 30, 1974;
endurance tests are to start September 30, 1974; and two units with spares are
to be shipped November 30, 1974.

Parallel development of the inlet guide vane actuator is in progress.  Its
functions and status are as follows:
          • Positions guide vanes at inlet to compressor
          • Powered by 50 to 100 psi fluid pressure from the turbine  lubri-
            cation system
          • Responds to signals from integrated gas turbine systei., controller
                                       -99-

-------
o
o
                              Fig.  59   Chrysler Fuel Control Noszle Trim Actuator Installation

-------
Fig. 60   Chrysler Fuel Control  Development Nozzle Actuator

-------
          • Designed for full stroke against operating load in 0.20 seconds
          • Servo loop closed by side mounted potentiometer
          • First unit scheduled for assembly week of May 13,  1974 and shipment
            July 31, 1974
          • Frequency response expected equivalent to trim actuator

A schematic of the motor driven fuel pump and its performance  is shown in
Fig.  61.

Questions and Comments
Question:  Concerning the motor driven fuel pump, does the system postulate  a
     constant volumetric efficiency for the pump, or is there  a feedback of
     actual fuel flow rate?
Answer:  The present philosophy is that performance degradation due to loss  of
     volumetric efficiency effects only the transient response and has no
     effect on steady state accuracy of the system.  If the system goes to
     production, it means the scale factor for pump speed to fuel flow would
     have to be adjusted periodically - analogous to a "tune-up".

Question:  Are transient pressure effects of the compressor included in the
     dynamic model?
Answer:  It is not known how to define these transient effects on this model
     until the results of tests on the actual engines with the system are
     available.  These effects may be significant, so this information should
     be very helpful.

Question:  How long does it take for the variable nozzle to move after control
     actuation is started?
Answer:  First movement of the actuator is in less than 50 milliseconds.
                                     -102-

-------
              FUEL TO
              ENGINE
              NOZZLE
FUEL FROM BOOST
PUMP
                        CONTROL
SPEED FEEDBACK SIGNAL   INPUT SIGNAL
                        SIGNAL
                                              PULSE WIDTH
                                              MODULATION
                                              CONTROL
                        12VDC
                        ELECTRICAL
                        SUPPLY
      IPUMP PERFORMANCE MAPI
     '0   8   16   24   32  40   48
           PUMP SPEED X 1000
                                     PULSE WIDTH MODULATION
                                     OF MOTOR ELECTRICAL INPUT
                                      MAXIMUM FLOW
                                           AVERAGE INPUT VOLTAGE
                                        VIN
                                                  TIME
                                      IDLE FLOW
                                            AVERAGE INPUT VOLTAGE
                                                  TIME
     Fig. 61   Motor-Driven Fuel Pump - Chrysler Automotive Gas
               Turbine Integrated Control System
                            -103-

-------
 E.   Low Cost  Turbine Wheel  Manufacturing Process,  by Marvin Allen,  Pratt &
      Whitney Aircraft Corp.
 The Florida Research and  Development Center is under contract to EPA to
 demonstrate the  feasibility  of low cost production  of automotive  turbine
 rotors by  the  Gatorising  process.

 The general objectives  of the  two-phase program are:
      Phase I
            • Design and  fabricate the dies and experimentally demonstrate
              low-cost, mass-production manufacturing techniques for automotive
              turbine disks.
            • Estimate  the  tooling and manufacturing  cost for a representative
             automotive  turbine disk for production  rates of one million
              turbine disks per year.

       Phase II
            • Produce,  evaluate, and deliver compressor turbine disks using  the
	           recommended manufacturing process for demonstration in the EPA-
              Baseline Gas Turbine Engine.

  The current contract authorizes only the first phase, as shown in Fig. 62.

  The program was initiated 26 April  1973 and is comprised of five  major tasks:
            • Task  1 - Baseline Process Demonstration
            • Task  2 - Process Parameter Evaluation
            • Task  3 - Generation of Design Data
            • Task  4 - Definition of Manufacturing Process
            • Task  5 - Manufacturing Cost Estimate

  The Task  1 basic  process  demonstration  involves the  procurement of  the program
  material, the designing  and fabrication of  preform forging  dies,  and  the GATORI7ING
  of the initial preform for  Baseline mechanical properties.  The selected pro-
  cessing parameters for the  raw material, the  GATORIZING parameters, and  the heat
  treatment were currently  used to  produce the  wrought  IN100  components for the
  F100 engine (the  F100 engine powers  the F-15  air superiority  fighter).
                                        -104-

-------
I
t-rf
o
PHASE 1 1
BILLET MATERIAL PROCUREMENT^
DESIGN DIES 4
DIE MATERIAL PROCUREMENT
MACHINE DIES AND INSTALL
FORGING TRIALS AND HEAT
TREATMENT
MECHANICAL PROPERTIES
BLADE HEAT-TREAT STUDIES
FORMULATE AND DESIGN
HANDBOOK FLOW SHEETS
COST ANALYSIS
REPORTS
MONTHLY REPORTS
INTERIM REPORT
FINAL DRAFT
EPA REVIEW
FINAL REPORT

t
wwy
^

^



J!

BOB
111

k^



J

US


U



J

JHijdffl

i
£


A

i
J
A
&m
Jam
I
i


s

M?M

UdUtib




O

3QB5






N

aora


am
i
cfc




D
1973
^



J

ffiSjffi
L _„,
^SSA


^
fafraf.
^



F


1
>
IA




1 &



M
^^
=» /
W~L
A
tv^oBK.
*3&*J
i



A


• \
l\

A

M




A

J





£
J
1974
                                                                 MONTHS
                                       Fig. 62  Phase  I Program Schedule

-------
 The  parametric evaluation,  Task 2,  involves the evaluation of additional
 forging  parameters and heat treatments.   The alternate processing will be
 designed to create the most favorable  structure in the preform for subsequent
 finish forging and to establish a thermal process, which produces mechanical
 properties consistent with  Chrysler's  design requirements.  The final part of
 Task 2 is the forgin6 and evaluation of  GATORIZED, integrally bladed rotors.
,.
-------
The  final bladed rotor design was  completed and the tooling fabricated.  A
cross  section of this tooling is shown in Fig.  63.   The cavities for the 53
blades are  formed by simple  split  inserts.  The finished machined tooling is
shown  in Fig. 64.

Eight  forging mults 44.45 mm (1.750 in.)  in diameter by 85.85 mm (3.38 in.)
high were machined from  the  extruded stock.  The mults, after being coated with
a boron nitride  lubricant, were GATORIZED to the preform configuration.  In
the  as-forged configuration  the preform exhibited a uniform, fully recrystal-
lized  fine-grained structure (ASTM 8 to 10 when viewed at 1000X).

These  preforms were used for the Task 1 and portions of the Task 2 evaluation
as summarized in Fig. 65.  The  test specimens for the mechanical property and/
or structural evaluation were  located within and machined from the forgings as
shown  in Fig. 66.  The depicted cut-up diagram was used for both the preform
and bladed  rotor evaluation.

The remaining preforms were  used to determine the effect of forging temperature
and solution temperature on  micros trueture and mechanical properties.  Mechani-
cal properties did not vary  significantly with forging temperatures in the
1038°C (1900°F)  to  1093°C  (2000°F) range.  Room temperature tensile properties
are shown  in Fig. 67.  The  reasons for the variation in tensile ductility
have not been fully explained.   Elevated tamperature tensile strength was
insensitive to forging  temperature over the entire range investigated.  Again
a degree  of inconsistency  in ductility was noted.  The elevated temperature
tensile data are presented  in Fig. 68.

Two preforms were used  to establish the effects of alternate heat treatments.
Gradient bars cut from one  of the  preforms were used to determine the effect
of heat treatment on microstructure.  The second preform was cut in half, and
each half  given  a heat  treatment selected from the gradient bar evaluation.
The purpose of this evaluation  was to establish a heat treatment (primarily
modified  solution temperature)  to  produce a coarser grained structure, which
would  exhibit mechanical properties commensurate (primarily stress-rupture)
                                     -107-

-------
                —f-
TOP KNOCKOUT PIN



           TOP DIE
                                   HOLD DOWN
                                    RINGS
BOTTOM DIE
                                   DIE INSERTS
                                   BOTTOM KNOCKOUT
                                    SYSTEM
       Fig. 63  Tool for Phase I — Task 2 Bladed Rotor
                     -108-

-------
O
•£>
i
                                Fig. 64   Finish Machined  Bladed  Rotor Tooling and Preform

-------
o
I
PROFORM FORGE TEMPERATURE
S/N °C °F
23
2-4
25
2-8
27
1010
1038
1038
1066
1093
1850
1900
1900
1950
2000
          2- 2 A


          2-28


          26

          2-SB
1038


1038


1038

1038
1900


1900


1900

1900
                                                 HEAT TREATMENT
                                             BASELINE:

                                             1121°C (2050°F) SOLUTION,
                                               OIL QUENCH
                                             871°C (1600°FI AIR COOL
                                             982°C (1800°F) AIR COOL
                                             649°C (1200°F) AIR COOL
                                             760°C (1400°F) AIR COOL
1163°C (2125°FI SOLUTION.
 AIR COOL + BASELINE

1177°C (2150°F) SOLUTION.
 AIR COOL > BASELINE

VARIOUS

1177°C C2150°F) SOLUTION.
 AIR COOL + BASELINE
                                                      PROGRAM USE
                                                            ASTM GRAIN SIZE
                                                            PREDOMINATE   OCCASIONAL
                                                      FORGE TEMPERATURE   10.5 • 13.5
                                                      STUDY
                                                      BASELINE DATA        10.5 • 13.5

                                                      BASELINE DATA        10.5 • 13.5
                                                      FORGE TEMPERATURE   11.5 • 13.5
                                                       STUDY
                                                      FORGE TEMPEATURE    9.5 • 12.5
                                                       STUDY
BLADE PROPERTY      4.0 • 6.0 AND
 CHARACTERIZATION   8.0 • 13.5

BLADE PROPERTY      3.0 • 4.0
 CHARACTERIZATION
GRADIENT BAR STUDY

BLADE PROPERTY
 CHARACTERIZATION
                                                                           10.0

                                                                           10.0

                                                                           9.5


                                                                           13.5
2.0 • 4.0
              6.0 • 8.0
5.0 • 10.C
                                              Fig. 65   Summary  of  Preform Evaluation

-------
           \
       CREEP-RUPTURE
V-NOTCH
RUPTURE
            LCF
CREEP-RUPTURE
 TENSILE
      TENSILE
 TENSILE
      TENSILE
V-NOTCH
RUPTURE
CREEP-RUPTURE
       CREEP-RUPTURE
   Fig. 66   Cut-Up Diagram
           -111-

-------
                                               ROTOR PREFORM DATA
                                             BASELINE HEAT TREATMENT
t
r-*
i—*
M
STRENGTH - Mn/m2
S § g S 2
ELONGATION % <* „. 	 ".. S (B C
 L
O • ULTIMATE STRENGTH Q - 0.2% YIELD STRENGTH A - % ELONGATION





L


/
/

\
^-r
A




\
•?'

£



]
\
2°C 10100C 1038°C 1066°C 1093°C
)0°F 1850°F 1900°F T950°F 2000°F
                                                    FORGE TEMPERATURE
                         Fig. 67   Room Temperature Tensile Properties vs. Forging Temperature

-------
C
5
X

|
Ul
ec
   1172
 1103
1034
   965
       170
                                ROTOR PREFORM  DATA
                              BASELINE HEAT TREATMENT

-*160
X
H
O

  l50
       140
                                                                                   9
            O- ULTIMATE STRENGTH  Q -  0.2% YIELD STRENGTH   A- % ELONGATION
lt>
°' 12
2 10
5 8
0 °
ri 4
2
9£
18


n
A A'
A A
i__




2?




A
A





J2"C 1010°C 1038°C
00°F 1850°F 1900°F
FORGE TEMPERATURE




L
^
1066°C 1093°C
1950°F 2000°F
               Fig. 68   760°C  (1400°F)  Tensile Properties vs Forgir* Temperature

-------
with blade operating temperatures.  These halves were  subsequently cut  up  for
mechanical property evaluation.  The effect  of  these heat treatments  on
tensile strengths is shown  in Fig. 69.  As expected  the  coarser grained material
exhibited a loss in tensile strengths.  However, a significant increase in
creep-rupture life was achieved  (Fig.  70).   The data referred to as baseline
represent material forged at all four  forging temperatures and given  the base-
line heat treatment.
                                       *

Four preforms were used  for the  initial bladed  rotor forging trials.  Because
it was determined during the preform evaluations  that  forging temperature  had
no significant effect on mechanical properties,  these  and subsequent  forgings
ware produced at a temperature commensurate  with  optimum forgeability.   The
first bladed rotor forging  trial resulted  in the  partially bladed rotor.  The
 lack of blade fill was attributed  to  the degree of  taper in the airfoil thick-
ness (root to tip).  The blade cavities were opened  up 0.010 to 0.020 in.  to
mit.imize  the frictional  forces.  The  resulting modified blade cross sections
are shown in Fig.  71.  The  first forging attempt  with  the modified blade
.inserts resulted .in a fully bladed rotor as  shown in Fig. 72.  Two additional
bladed rotors were subsequently  forged.  The four rotor forgings (one with
 underfilled blades) were heat  treated, cut-up and evaluated to complete the
Task 2 and Task 3B evaluations.  A summary  of the  bladed rotor evaluations is
-given  in  Fig. 73.  The results of  this evaluation established the processing
 parameters for  the rotors  used to  generate  design data.   Forging at alternate
strain rates in the range  of 0.6  to 1.0  in./in./min. had no effect on .nechanical
 properties or microstructure.

Two additional variations  of  the heat  treatment used to produce a coarse
grained structure were evaluated.   The aim was to achieve the highest LCF
capability commensurate  with  the coarse  g.rain size.  Figures 74, 75 and 76
show that, while sacrificing  tensile  strength (compared to baseline), one  of
 the alternate heat treatments  resulted in  the highest  LCF capability  and
maintained the desired  level  of  stress-rupture strength.  This heat treatment
was, therefore, selected for  the Task 3 -  Design Data.
                                      -114-

-------
          ROTOR PREFORM DATA

     1038°C (T900°F) FORGE TEMPERATURE
13 I/
1379
a 1241
.E
| 1103
t
5 965
U
UJ
{E 827
CO
UJ
si 689
CO
Z
UJ
"~ 552
414
276
0°F) SOLUTION + B




IASELINE |
ASELINE





<


I
r
1
       ROOM             760°C             927°C
       TEMP            1400° F             1700° F

                   TEST TEMPERATURE
Fig. 69  Tensile Properties vs Solution Temperature
982°C
18000F
        o
        •*
        o
                                                                             m
                                                                      o
                                                                      3
                                                                      0
                                                                      cr

-------
     TOO
                               ROTOR PREFORM DATA
v>
V)
UJ
cc
to
                                                SOLUTION TEMPERATURE
                                                  O • BASELINE - 1121°C  (2050°F)
                                                      (ALL FORGE TEMPERATURES)
                                                  A - TI63°C (2125°F) + BASELINE
                                                  D - 1177°C (2150°F) + BASELINE
                43
44        45       46        47       48

    PARAMETER = T(20 + LOG t) x TO'3
49
50
                     Fig. 70   Stress Rupture Capability vs Solution Temperature

-------
   TIP
MIDSPAN
  ROOT
                               	CURRENT DESIGN
                               	MODIFIED TOOLING
             Fig. 71   Modified Blade Cross-Section
                            -117-

-------
Fig. 72   Fully Bladed Rotor Forging
                -118-

-------
           ROTOR       FORGE TEMPERATURE        HEAT TREATMENT
            S/N           PfiEFORM      fiOTOR
                       °C     (°F)    °C    (°F)
           29          1038   1900   1093   2000  BASELINE
                                                      PROGRAM USE
                                                      ALTERNATE STRAIN
                                                      RATE STUDY
                                                                             ASTM GRAIN SIZE
                                                                           PREDOMINATE   OCCASIONAL

                                                                           11.5 • 13.5
           210
1038   1900   1003   2000
1177°C (2150°FI SOLUTION.       ALTERNATE HEAT
AIR COOL + 1121°C I2050°FI      TREAT STUDY
SOLUTION, AIR COOL + BASELINE
STABLIZATION AND AGE
                                                                                                   3.0 • 4.0
                                                                                          7.0 • 10.0
o
i
           211
1038   1900   1093   2000   1177°C (2150°F) SOLUTION. AIR   ALTERNATE HEAT
                         COOL  * 1066°C (1950°F)         TREAT STUDY
                         SOLUTION. AIR COOL +
                         BASELINE STABILIZATION AND AGE
                                                                                                   4.0 • 6.0
                                                                                          7.0 - 8.0
           2-12A         1038   1900   1093  2000   1163°C (2125°F) SOLUTION, AIR   BLADE PROPERTY
                                                 COOL + BASELINE               CHARACTERIZATION
                                                                            3.0 - 4.0
                                                                                          6.0 • 10.0
           2-12B
1C38   1900   1093   2000   1177°C (2150°F) SOLUTION, AIR    BLADE PROPERTY
                          COOL + BASELINE               CHARACTERIZATION
                                                                           4.0 •  6.0
                                                                 6.0 • 8.0
                                           Fig.  73    Summary of Bladed  Rotor Evaluation

-------
           1038°C (1900°F)/1093°C (2000°F) FORGE TEMPERATURE
ID I/
117Q



CM SOD
E
c
E
|_ Olt
STRENG:
n o
I 5
tc^

•77C
lift

£.£&
TOO
iftn
iftn

«•
JC
X
STRENC
I i





O © BASELINE:
^ 1121°C (2050°F) OIL QUENCH
~ . A A 1163°C (2125°FI AIR COOL «•
O * 1121°C (2050°F) OIL QUENCH
V7 Q iU 1177°C (2150°F) AIR COOL *
1121°C (2050°FI OIL QUENCH '
^7 ^ 1177°C (2150°F) AIR COOL *
1121°C (2050°FI AIR COOL
^ £> V ^ H77°C (2150°F) AIR COOL *
O 1066°C (1950°F) AIR COOi.
W & C^An VO> ULTIMATE STRENGTH
V ^ &H3 V^ °-2% YIEt-") STRENGTH

D
9
A
2
ROOM 760°C »27°C 982°C
TEMP 1400°F 1700°F 1800°F
                         FORGE TEMPERATURE
Fig. 74   Tensile  properties vs Heat Treattient  -  Bladed Rotor Data
                               -120-

-------
   100
                  1038°C (1900°F)/1093°C(2000eF) FORGE TEMPERATURE
VI
at
cc
K-
(O
    10
                                                                    ezo
                                                        50°F)
                  HEAT TREATMENT  |
                       O  - BASELINE: 1121°C
                           OIL QUENCH        |
                           1177°C (2150°F) AIR COOL +
                           1121°C (2050°F) AIR COOL
                           1177°C (2150°F) AIR COOL +
                           1066°C  (1950°F) AIR COOL
                           1163°C (2125°F) Ala COOL +
                           1121°C (2050°F) OIL QUENCH
                                               A

                                               D

                                               A
       NOTE: TYPICAL CURVES FROM PREFORM DATA. FIGURE 16.
          	I	I	I	I	I	I
      42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
                          PARAMETER  = T(20 + LOG  t) x 10
                                                          -3
              Fig. 75  Stress Rupture Capability vs Heat Treatment -  Bladed Rotor Data

-------
           "1
           H'
           00
                                                                      CYCLES TO FAILURE
NJ
I
O \D
to ro
rt ^j
fti   O

<^°
O ^v
3 »-
cn ^
rr O
ft) O
3   O
rt •»)
H"O
n tu
en o"
rt K*
         w <
         rt ce
         fl
         tt S
         »* O
         S 61
         B1
         re ta
           rt
         Sri
           W
           (3
           CU
           rt
           O
           •1
                                           BASELINE:
                                           1121°C (2050°F)
                                           OIL QUENCH
                                           1163°C (2125°F). AIR COOL

                                         + 1121°C (2060°F) CIL QUENCH
                                           1177°C (2150°F). AIR COOL

                                         + 1121°C (2050°F) OIL QUENCH
                                  1177°C (2150°F) AIR COOL

                                + 1121°C (20SO°F) AIR COOL
                                  1177°C (2150°F) AIR COOL

                                  1066°C (1950°F) AIR COOL
                                                                                  oo
                                                                         O
                                                                                          O    O
                                                                                         00
                                                                                                                 O
                                                                                                                  O

-------
An important conclusion is that preferential heat treatment of the blade area
is not necessary to maximize stress-rupture and LCF strength.

The remaining effort on the Phase I program includes:
          • Complete design data:  tensile, creep-rupture and LCF.
          • Complete the "Manufacturing Design Handbook".
          • Complete the production cost analysis.

Questions and Comments
Question:  It appears that trailing edge thickness of the blades and disk
     thickness are about twice that in current engines.  What about loss in
     aerodynamic performance and reduced acceleration of the wheel?
Answer:  The disk dimensions are the same as the current engine design except
     for the pockets under the blade roots.  These were not necessary to
     demonstrate the fabrication process.  In Phase II the web thickness will
     be reduced almost 2/3 without sacrificing strength and giving an even
     lighter wheel.  Although trailing edge thicknesses can be reduced to
     0.018 to 0.020 inch, it probably will not be possible to get down to the
     present 0.012 inch.  It is being suggested that comparative tests be
     run in Phase II to measure the loss in performance.  Similar experiences
     with aircraft engines have shown that the small losses predicted analyti-
     cally often do not show up as a measurable degradation in engine performance.

Question:  How long does it take from receipt of the billet to the forged
     product including the aging?
Answer:  Using a single forge practice, the forging time is 7 minutes.  Heat
     treatment and aging could be as long as 26 hours.  There are some techniques
     whereby this time may be reduced.
                                     -123-

-------
F.   Gas  Turbine Low Emission Combustion System, by D. J. White. Solar,
     Division of International Harvester
The present low emission combustor program at Solar is the culmination of
several years of intensive research in this field; i.e., combustor concepts
developed and proved in previous programs have been further expanded to ensure
practical application to an automotive gas turbine engine.  The overall objec-
tive of the program is to develop a low emission combustion system for instal-
lation and demonstration in the EPA/AAPS Baseline Gas Turbine Engine.

Three specific program goals have been defined:
          • The combustor should be capable of operating over the entire
            engine cycle.
          • The combustor should meet one-half or less of the original 1976
            Federal Automotive Emission Standards:
                           NOx  (as N02)    - 0.20 gm/mile
                           CO              -  1.70 gm/mile
                           UKC  (as CH. „,) - 0.21 gmAnile
                                      1 . OJ
          • The combustor/actuating mechanism should meet the engine interface
            requirements.

 In the initial  phase of  the program test optimization of models of the key
 combustor components was accomplished.  Design, based on  these  various compo-
 nents such as  the variable geometry port and  the  ignition system, was then
 integrated into a full-scale  prototype combustor.

 This combustor  (Figs.  77, 78, and  79)  includes all necessary wall cooling
 devices and a  fully modulating  variable area  pore and actuating mechanism
 system.

 At present the  combustor  is still  on  the  test stand undergoing  mechanism
 development and final emissions evaluation.   Control  of  the variable area ports
 on the test rig is manual, through  a remote, electrical actuator.  Cold  lightoff
 is achieved using a torch igniter  mounted  on  the  side of  the primary zone body.
A spark ignition system  is used, in addition, to  provide hot relights.
                                      -124-

-------
                   ti
                          : ].f* -r-'-Aj	.-
      Fig. 77   Layout of Phase II JIC-E Combustor
Fig. 78   JIC-S Variable Geometry Low Emission Combustor
Fig. 79   JIC-B Variable Geometry Low Emission Combustor
                        -125-

-------
Emission levels obtained during testing over the Simulated Federal Driving
Cycle,  indicate the feasibility of meeting one-half of original 1976 Emission
Standards (see  Figs.  80, 81, 82, 83, 84, and 85).  Problems of mechanism
reliability still exist.  The mechanism design criteria require the mechanism
to be capable of:
          • Operating in an oxidizing environment up to 1200°F
          • Moving the ports from full open to full closed positions in
            l/20th of a second
          • Operating reliably with minimal actuation forces and minimal
            movement
          • Operating wichout significant air leakage

Problems which have come up include:
          • Failtre of graphite bushings (seals .for actuating rods)
          • Misalignment of actuating cam rings
          • Rotation of actuating rods and cam follower mechanism

Solutions to these mechanism problems will involve:
          • Positive cam ring centering system
          • Longer and more effective bushings
          • Cam follower arrangement that does not rotate or is insensitive
            to rotation

Obviously, further development will be needed before such a combustor/engine
combination can be used to power a vehicle.  However, it can be concluded that
the original 1976 Emission Standards can be satisfied with this burner if
Point 2 on the FDC w:.li permit 8 pounds per hour fuel flow (see Fig. 86).  The
mechanism works aver the full operating range of the engine, but its life is
unknown.  Integration with the control system is required for activation.

Questions and Comments
Conroent:  Prime effort on this combustion system has beer, focused on achieve-
     ment of low emissions; relatively  little effort has been devoted to
                                      -126-

-------












*•»!
«-c«M
•
10
15.5
«.S
ST.-

OMftf
lliMUl

Iptif
1C
«
i 6
10
IT
l)

Im.lm*


•fl
1150
I1M
9T5
1153
USD
1150

«.:«"


rr)
•«»ctM
IND
I?M
I4TO
ISM
UK

WJ"'.5


'l^/ttcl
O.W
o,n
O.T)
aw
1 15
1.00

rn.lt.


TIUC
'M '5«cl
«.<• It
11.44 1ST
M»? 407
)MO UO
n IN
iti n
itnoo ;ir;













   Fig. 80   Simulated Federal  Driving Cycle Mode
                       100    200    »e    *OC
                        TEMPERATURE (I5L.OCC r
Fig. 81    Simulated Federal  Driving Cycle Emissions
16.00

14.X

I?.00

10.00

1.00 j-

t.x

4.00
               - CTCLC POINT f DC POINT 3
                COM3 P«CSS
               ' COUfJ. TEMP
                                        -NO.
                                      POUT OPENINGS
                                      PfllMART l«^
                                      DILUTION lOOt
                                      PBOPIUM GOAL
                           .          .
                          (OUIVILENCC »TIO
            rfootui
                        n    mt>    »o    400
                        TEUPER«-U«E Br)[.DEO *
Fig. 82    Simulated Federal  Driving Cycle Emissions
                            -127-

-------
               EMISSIONS RATIO
                                 DESIGN
                1001-               POINT
                  I FEDERAL DRIVING
                   CVCLE PT NO. »
                A-QoU^0"8- PRESS 10 PSIG
                   COMa TEUP. ll» DfG. F
Fig.  83    Simulated  Federal  Driving Cycle  Emissions
              EMISSIONS RATIO
                  FEDERAL DRIVING POINT NO
                  COMB PRESS  I7PSIG
                  COMB TEUP.  11W) DEC F
                             006   O.M   O.tO
                             EJUIVALCNCE HATIO

                          »o    no  "406"   soo~
                            TEUPERATUBE RISC-DEC F
Fig.  84    Simulated  Federal Driving Cycle  Emissions
                   CYCIE POINT  fOC »*O 6
                   COMB PRC3S  I) PSIG
                   COMB. 1 CMP  IIU DEC. F
                              EQUIVALENCE RATIO

                      TOO'   WO"* "90o" ~"lbo6"  ~l!00
                           TEMPERATURE RISC-DEG. F
 Fig. 85    Simulated  Federal  Driving Cycle Emissions
                              -128-

-------

NOV •'** NO^I -
CO
UHC 1*3 CHf 5( -
ORIGINAL
lilt, STAND ARC*
0.4 gnvWIe
JL« flm/mll«
0.4? gm/miU
PROGRAM OOAL1
Q.l
-------
     mechanical development and packaging.   The program requirements have
     changed  in the  course  of the program;  increasingly difficult goals have
     been established.

Question:  Does the  Point 2 data represent  a flashback or normal operating
 • « : i  - - •
     condition?                     "           "      •          ... .   ,
Answer:   Point 2 data represents a normal operational mode.  Monitoring
     thermocouples in the port indicate when flashback occurs.  Also, CO
     emissions suddenly increase very rapidly.

Question:  Have you measured the effect on emissions of step changes in fuel
     flow and variable geometry?
Answer:   Attempts have just recently been made to make step changes  from
     Point Number 2 to Point Number 6.  This is difficult to do with three
     manual controls to operate  (2 controlling variable geometry and one for
     the fuel valve).  Also it is difficult to integrate the emission traces.
     Data from these attempts are being processed now,_ and .will be jrepqrted
     subsequently.  Also such tests will be run on the Chrysler engine.

G.   Oxide Recuperator Technology Program,  by K. R. Kormanyoa. Owens-Illinois
     Corp.
The project objective is the investigation of low expansion glass-ceramic
materials for the fabrication of low cost recuperators for automotive gas-
turbine  engines.  The program is divided into six complementary tasks dealing
with specific aspects of recuperator design and fabrication inherent to the
use of a glass-ceramic naterial:
          • Task 1 - Parametric design analysis
          • Task 2 - Sample fabrication to establish manufacturing feasibility
          • Task 3 - Conceptual design
          • Task 4 - Core fabrication and testing
          • Task 5 - Seal development
          • Task 6 - Trade-off evaluation and cost estimates
                                     -130-

-------
The work through Task 3  has been completed and previously reported.  The
sample core  fabrication  and testing,  Task 4, are discussed here.  Objectives
for the next period  are  suggested.

Single pass  crossflow test cores were fabricated using Cer-VitR C-126 glass-
ceramic material'. The test cores were 5-inch cubes using 0.025 inch ID tubes
with a 0.002-inch wall (Fig. 87).  Each of the cores was leak tested measuring
cross circuit leakage as a function of pressure (Fig. 88); the results indicated
that it would be possible to successfully fabricate low leakage recuperators
and that the current fabrication technique requires refinement to achieve
consistent leakage properties.

A pressure burst test on one of the cores showed that the core survived 11
atmospheres absolute at  room temperature, implying that a glass-ceramic
recuperator should be able to withstand operating pressures expected with an
acceptable safety margin.

A thermal cycle test rig was fabricated and tested.  It allows hot and cold
air to be alternately passed through one flow path while ambient temperature
air is continuously  passed through the other path to approximate the temperature
transients of an engine  start-up.  Fracture of a core tested in the rig follow-
ing one thermal cycle (Fig. 89) indicates that the thermal properties of the
material system in matrix form require additional investigation.  The importance
of an operable metal-ceramic interface system has been reinforced.

In view of the observed  cross-leakage data scatter between individual samples,
a contract extension has been proposed, the direction of which is to refine
the existing fabrication process to the point that test cores can be fabricated
with consistently low cross circuit leakage.  The fabrication effort being
considered will include  counterflow as well as crossflow test cores since the
probability exists that  a counterflow unit will be the final design requirement.
Also matrix property characterization is needed including such critical factors
as ultimate  matrix strength, heat transfer properties, etc.
                                     -131-

-------
Fig. 87   Typical 5-Inch Glass Ceramic Test Core

-------
  ISO
o
uJ
o

-------
1800 r
1400
 ESTIMATE OF START-UP
TOR A RECUPERATED ENGINE
                             TIME (MINUTES)
                  Fig. 89   Test Rig Thermal Cycle
                             -134-

-------
Questions and Comments
Question:  Has  consideration been given to the configuration that might be
     used with  the  Baseline Engine?
Answer:  Results  of Task 3 Indicate that a minimum volume single pass,  cross-
     flow, rectangular  configuration should be suitable - about 34-inch high
     (no flow side), 6-Inch gas flow length, and 8-inch air flow length.
     Hydraulic  diameter is about 0.025-inch ir both flow directions.   It would
     be  mounted on  the  side in a manner similar to the present Baseline Engine
     regenerator.

Question:  What about the problem of plugging without the benefit of  alternating
     reverse flow as in the regenerator?
Answer:  Clean  combustion is required.

Question:  Why  are  ceramic materials chosen for the heat exchanger?
Answer:  The trend  in engine development is toward higher operating  temperatures
     to  achieve lower fuel rates.  Ceramic materials should be able  to with-
     stand  these higher temperatures at a lower cost than the more exotic high
     temperature metals.
Comment:  The size  of the single pass, cross flow heat exchanger quoted above
     is  for  equivalent thermal effectiveness and pressure drop of a  regenerator.

Question;  Was  the  burst test run over an extended period of time?  Has possible
     stress  corrosion been examined?
Answer:  Stress corrosion has not been investigated.  Pressure was increased in
     a series of plateaus to 11 atmospheres, the limit of the test rig.
Comment  (Tom Sebestyen, EPA):  It was pointed out that the original  intent  of
     the present program is to demonstrate the fabrication technology so that
     overall development is still in the very early stages.
Comment  (Representative from Climax Molybdenum):  The ceramics versus metal
     heat exchanger controversy has been of interest for a number of years.
     Some new stainless steel alloys haws been developed which have  about twice
                                     -135-

-------
     the creep-rupture strength  of 430  stainless.   They should be  good,
     economical candidate materials  for heat  exchanger applications  up  to  1400
     or  1500 F.  It  is doubtful  if the  ceramic  materials discussed above would
     be  suitable for long-term applications  in  the  1750°F range.
Comment  (Tom Sebestyen, EPA):  These are still  points of discussion  and
     controversy.  The intent of the technology programs is to develop  infor-
     mation and know-how  for advanced engines which may require heat exchangers
     in  the  1800 and 1900°F range on a  relatively  r^Ar-term basis,

H.   Ceramic Regenerator  Reliability, by Chris  Rahnke, Ford Motor Company
     (Guest  Presentation)
EPA is negotiating a program with Ford Motor Company to develop a ceramic
regenerator  which  will satisfy  the  requirements of the EPA Chrysler automotive
gas turbire;  i.e., up to  800°C  (1475°F inlet temperature) and have a B-10 life
of 3500 hours  when operating  on  a passenger car duty cycle with diesel  fuel
No.  1, No. 2,  and/or unleaded  gasoline.

Ford has been  running regenerators  in engines for several years accumulating
more than 100,000  hours  of operation on a large sample of lithium-aluminum-
silicate (LAS) cores from two  different suppliers.  This operating experience
has shown the  major  causes of  failures to be:  excessive thermal stresses and
chemical attack on the matrix  material.

Because the  periphery is  surrounded  by relatively cold compressor discharge
air and the  center part  by hot  exhaust gas, tensile stresses are set up around
the  rim and  compressive  stresses are set up in the center part of the core.
When high enough,  these  stresses cause cracks in the matrix and ultimate failure
of the core.   A 100°F rise in  regenerator inlet temperature will cause  a 257=
increase in  stress.   Hence,  high inlet temperatures are a major cause ot"
failures.

The source of  chemical attack is sodium, potassium, and sulfur from  fuel
impurities,  and ingested  road  salt.   Sodium and potassium attack  the hot side;
sulfur in the  form of sulfuric  acid  attacks the cold side leaching the lithium
out of the matrix  material thereby  increasing its thermal coefficient of
expansion and  causing mechanical failure of the core.
                                     -136-

-------
Corrective measures include:
         • Mechanical design  techniques  to relieve  thermal stress and
           regenerator drive  loads  at  the  rim of the  core.
         • Coatings  to protect  LAS  material from exposure  to deleterious
           chemicals.
         • Low expansion materials  which are impervious to chemical attack
           such as magnesium-aluminum-silicates (MAS).   The major effort  is
           being expended  on  this approach.
         • Fabrication methods  and  matrix  geometries  which would result  in
           superior  and more  consistent  material quality.

The EPA/FORD  program  includes  three  phases  as follows:
Phase One:  Summary report  on  previous  experience, data  and state-of-the-art
with ceramic  regenerator cores at Ford  Motor Company.   This will include:
description of failure modes,  thermal stress, analytical techniques and calcu-
lation of regenerator safety factors, and laboratory and engine operating
experiences.

Phase Two:  Laboratory and  engine durability tests on  new regenerator materials,
fabrication techniques and  coatings.  Tests will be  conducted on the Ford  707
engine; correlating factors will be  established so that  durability dat? can
be applied  to the EPA Chrysler automotive turbine and  other engines.  Between
10,000 and 20,000 hours of  dynamometer  testing will  be  conducted (corresponds
to 20,000 to  40,000 core hours)  on a large  sample of cores  this year.

Phase Three:  A report will be submitted  providing the  design method and  speci-
fication needed for a passenger  car  regenerator system which will meet EPA
durability objectives.  Completion date is  April 1,  1975.

Questions and Comments
Question:  To what extent is the EPA/Ford Program a  mutual  effort as compared
     to a ir,ore conventional contracted  effort?
                                    -137-

-------
Answer:   Ford  is  providing a report summarizing extensive test and development
     background.   Design work done earlier this year on new design techniques
     to  reduce rim stress and new drive techniques will be reflected in the
     test cores of Phase Two which will be made of MAS and coated LAS materials.
     Cores will be supplied by:  Corning Class, G.T.E. Sylvania, Coors porcelain,
     and W. R. Grace.

Question:  Are seals included in the program?
Answer:   Seals are excluded.  Just the regenerator, its mount, and its drive
     are included.

Question:  Have tests been run with atmospheric pressure on both sides of the
     disk with the outside pressurized to improve the stresses?
Answer:   This configuration has not been run.  However, failures have been
     correlated with calculated stresses at given temperatures.  This constitutes
     a calculation of the structural strength.

Question:  What are the stresses under transient as compared to steady-stare
     conditicns?
Answer;   Ana'.ysis shows that the transient stresses under start-up (worst
     condition) are about 107. higher than steady-state stresses.

Question:  What are current acceptable temperature levels for Che core inlet?
     What diameters were you working with?
Answer:   Temperature tolerance varies widely with stress relief in c' e rim and
     the duty cycle.  Some cores have operated without failure for biief
     periods at 1750°F with a stress relieved rim.  A 28.5 inch O.D. »  ire was
     used, but the stress does not seem to vary much with tht size of c;\e core
     provided the radius ratios of the seals are about the same.
                                     -138-

-------
I.    Ceramics  for Turbines, by  Dr. E. H.  Lenoe.  U.S.  Army Materials  and
     Mechanics  Research Center  (Guest  Presentation)
The Army Materials and Mechanics  Research Center(AMMRC)  is engaged in partici-
pative  monitoring of a "Brittle Materials Design,  High Temperature Cas Turbine"
program.  This  program, funded  by Advanced Research  Projects Agency, Westing-
house,  and Ford, aims at  building a  gas turbine  entirely fron ceramic materials.
Specific tasks  are to demonstrate:
         •  Ceramic vanes operating  at  2500°F in a 30-Mv central station
            turbine
         •  An all-ceramic 100  to 500  hp class engine including rotors.
            stators. ducting,  reger.«rators, combustors and nozzles.

The ARPA program is at mid-point; considerable progress has been made.
Frivary ceramic materials have  been  identified,  ceraraic component design
iterations have been completed, and  process development has led to the fabrica-
tion of ceramic parts which have  been  tested with encouraging results.  A
technology base Co utilise uncooled  high temperature ceramic components  has
been established.  This  is the  key to  increasing gas turbine operating tempera-
tures so  that  significant improvements is specific fuel consumption and
specific power can be  realized.

This briefing:
         •  Briefly  reviews the status of the ARPA project
         •  Discusses AMMRC supporting in-hcuse  studies
         •  Describes a  planning study recently  contracted between the
            Environmental Protection Agency and  the AMMRC-Planning Directorate

2500°F Target  for Propulsion  and  Power Systems:   It is widely known that
propulsion and power generation represents a most promising area for using high
temperature, high strength ceramic materials.  Several of the more apparent
advantages of  ceramics are:
                                    -139-

-------
          • Increased turbine inlec temperature
                (Lower fuel consumption/hp or kw)
          • Enhanced erosion-corrosion resistance
          • Multiple fuel capability (all volatile hydrocarbons)
          • Lower cost than superalloys and no strategic materials
          • Elimination of cooling
                                   iv

Another major reason for the increasing interest in ceramic gas turh.iies is
because of their beneficial impact on problems of energy, air pollution and
materials resources.  Considering the fuel and oil consumption of passenger
cars, it is imperative that fossil fuels be more efficiently utilized.
Obviously, one can reduce the size of cars and develop an alternate power
plant with improved fuel economy,  lighter weight and multifile 1 capability.

In assessing and compiling engine performance it is important to choose a
representative driving cycle.  Recently, Ford Motor Company compared estimated
ceramic gas turbine and piston engine fuel consumption 0:1 a basis of:
                     257. city driving
                     387, suburban driving
                     377= driving at 50 nph
Figure 90 suggests in a general way that the potential improvement in fuel
utilization is of the order of 307..

As for power generator applications, by 1990 the demand for electrical energy
is expected to increase by more than a factor of 3.  Coal and nuclear energy
vill remain as significant fuel sources.  Consequently, there is great
incentive to develop a power generating system which will most effectively
use coal.  Of the current fossil fueled power plant systems, the combined
gas turbine and steam plant is the most efficient with a conversion of 427..
This c «n be raised to more than 507. by improving the gas turbine system
efficiency through higher inlet temperature.  The importance of ceramics is
that they provide the only direcl. materials approach to reaching inlet tempera-
tures of 2500°F and higher, where gains are greatest.  Other approaches tTni-h as
metal cooling have an anticipated  limit in the region of about 2150°F because
of the necessity for using residual insteAd of clean distillate fuels.
                                     -UO-

-------
             130
  RELATIVE
    FUEL     120
CONSUMPTION
             110

             too
                         CERAMIC  GAS TURBINE
                         GASOLINE PISTON ENGINE
                   I    I DIESEL ENGINE
                    VEHICULAR TURBINE
                  CITY/SUBURBAt, DRIVING
MAXIMUM POWER
  APPLICATIONS
       Fig. 90   Ceramic Gas Turbine/Piston Engine Fuel Economy Comparison
                                 -141-

-------
In tests  to date, ceramic  components  have  shown potential  strength  and  corro-
sion resistance  to meet an uncooled 2500°F turbine  goal  by the  1980's.   Note
that the  operation of  large  power  generating  turbines  with only the vanes
uncooled, at 2500 F would  also  yield  20% more power with the  same  fuel  input
(Fig.  91).

To attain 2500 F turbine  inlet  temperatures without cooling in  engines  of Army
interest, means  that  ceramic materials  will have to be employed in the  hot
flow path (combustors, nozzles,  vanes,  rotors, shrouds and ducting).  In
addition, it appears  that  ceramic  materials can offer  improved  performance  of
bearings  and seals  ir. high temperature  or  unlubricated environments.  The use
of ceramics  in both  large  and small military  gas turbine engines should lead
to the following advantages:
         •  Reduced weight and  more efficient field power generators
         •  Reduced weight engines for  craft  and vehicles  with:
                 —  greater range
                 —  greater payload
                 — enhanced air mobility
         •  Reduction in  weight with  increased efficiency for:
                 — aircraft engines
                 — auxiliary power units
                 —  primary power plants for limited life applications
         •  Strategic advantage of reduced dependence  on foreign hydrocarbon
            fuels

In addition  to these,  there is  a logistic  advantage in less fuel to be  trans-
ported, nandled, and  stored, as well  as a  multifuel capability.  Viewed against
the background of a  national fuel  shortage, the goal of  a 20% decrease  in
specific  fuel consumption is particularly  attractive.  Similarly,  reducing
dependence on chromium and nickel  based superalloys appears to  be  prudent
based on  p-ojected estimates of materials  availability and domestic resources.

The ARPA  program has  caused a world-wide flurry of  activity in  ceramic  materials
development.  Currently more than  eighteen turbine  manufacturers have tested  or
                                     -142-

-------
GAS TURBINE
 EFFICIENCY -
               50
               40
               30
                   CERAMIC VANES
                   PRECOOLED
                      AIR
                  _TO VANES
                       CERAMIC VANES
                        AND
           ZERO BLEEDS
           AND LEAKAGE
20
  100
                      -CONVENTIONAL
                       AIR COOLING
                          !	S
                                COMPRESSOR
                               PRESSURE RATIO
                              _L
         I
                         120
                     140
160
180
200
                       GAS TURBINE POWER  PER UNIT
                           AIRFLOW - KW/LB/SEC
   Fig. 91
Gas Turbine Performance at Turbine Inlet Temperature = 2400 F
                             -143-

-------
fabricated ceramic hardware  in the United States,  Great Britain,  Germany and
Japan.   Thus  it  is appropriate to accelerate utilization of high  temperature,
high strength ceramics  in energy conversion systems.

Some Current  Engine  Results:  Results to date have demonstrated that the sta-
tionary hot  flow path components can go through an actual engine  test (2000°F
with metal rotors) and  still be serviceable after a testing sequence of:  (1)
cold static  testing; (2)  hot static testing, including 50 light-ups; and (3)
hot dynamic  testing  at  55% maximum design speed for 25 hours.  (These compo-
nents will be subjected to further testing.)

On the basis  of  these tests, it is now apparent that stationary reaction
bonded silicon nitride  components have demonstrated performance capability for
application  to non-man  rated, short-lived engines, such as target drones,
RPV's, or GT powered missiles.  An example of how design iterations are leading
to increased  component  life  and reliability can be seen from the  improved
reaction bonded  silicon nitride (RBSN) component performance shown in Figs.  92,
93, and 94).

Shown in Fig. 95 is  a so-called duo-density rotor concept employing injection
molded, reaction bonded silicon nitride hub.  Such parts have been successfully spin-
tested at more than  57,000 rpm.

During the project,  numerous materials and processing techniques have been
studied. Thus a technology  base has been established which involves techniques
to produce high  temperature  ceramic parts at low cost and with little or no
machining, depending on the  production techniques.  Slip castings,  injection
molding, chemical vapor deposition and glass forming methods certainly  result
in lower strength materials, but they offer the advantage of economy of pro-
duction.

In the hot pressed materials, on the other hand, the machining and  finishing
requirements  have been  thorrughly investigated so that cost estimates can now
be made on a  more realistic  basis.  Furthermore, in order to minimize machining,
hot pressing  to  shape of silicon nitride and silicon carbide has been explored.
                                     -144-

-------
                                  OUTER BELL SECTION
                                  INNER BELL SECTION
     FAILED AS  INDICATED

  6         4.5         62
  I          I
 HOT        HOT
  I          I
STATIC    DYNAMIC    LITES
                                                  HOURS      HOURS
                                                    I          I
                                                    8          47


                                                        STILL SERVICABLE
                        95
                                  OUTER BELL SECTION
Fig. 92   Design Modification Leading  to  Improved Nose Cone Performance
                                -1-45-

-------
 MAXIMUM
 PART LIFE
TO DATE-
   HRS
220
200

180
160
140
120
100

80

60

40
20
Q

• _
X
A •
/ -
x 	 x'
/C 5 "
f*~~
* /
/
. DES A /
- STATORS -«-/
EXHIBITED /
" 5 HRS HOT ^-*B
.DYNAMIC LIFE /"B
/™7^"™
-------


Design
B
C


Number of
Stators
Tested
9
7


Total
Hours
151
212


Total
Lights
356
611
Total
Number of
Broken or
Cracked
Blades
60
7


Average
Hours Per
Failure
2.5
30.3


Average
Lights Per
Failure
5.9
87.3
• AN ORDER OF MAGNITUDE IMPROVEMENT



• MATERIALS PROPERTIES AND PROCESSING HISTORY CONSTANT
    Fig.  94   Design Iteration Results for First Stage Stators
                           -147-

-------
              HOT-PRESSED
      REACTION
      SINTERED
Fig. 95   The Duo-Density Rotor Concept
                   -148-

-------
It is possible to produce  high quality hot pressings with compound curvatures.
.The rotor hub in the duo-density rotor wheel, for instance, has been success-
fully produced in a single hot pressing with minimum machining required.

As for progress on  the Westinghouse stationary turbine, a full scale model of a
stator vane assembly has been constructed.  Twenty vane assembly components
have been completed and a.  vane assembly has been successfully tested at 2200°F.
A 2500 F test rig for vane comp'onent testing is under construction and further
elevated temperature, full scale vane tests will be completed.  In addition,
during the past two years, Westinghouse has measured engineering properties of
silicon nitride and silicon carbide ceramics at temperatures up to 2500°F.  A
first-design study  iteration of a first-stage rotor blade for a 30Mw gas tur-
bine has been completed.   The results are encouraging as the maximum predicted
tensile stress  (38,000 psi) is within the capability of current materials.

Current technology  levels  indicate a number of immediate opportunities for
Army application of ceramics in propulsion and power generation:
         • Nozzle  guide vanes for APU's
                —  Increased erosion resistance demonstrated
                —  Benefit - reduction of maintenance
         • Ceramic roller bearings
                —  Increased fatigue life
                —  Non-lubricated operation
         • Limited life engines
                —  Stationary hot flow path
                — Components for drones, RPV's, and missiles

Work in these areas is being pursued both in the ARPA program on design,
specific materials  and processing improvement; and in-house on a more general
basis.  AMMRC's role  in  these areas has been to provide an in-depth technology
base and to address critical problems which might otherwise be ignored.

AMMRC Support:  In addition to monitoring the program AMMRC has provided
support in numerous areas  including:
                                     -149-

-------
         • Critical review and analysis of  program
         • Critical review of reports
         • Technical assistance  to contractor  in  radiography  failure analysis,
           nitriding kinetics, neutron activation analysis, etc.
         • Information dissemination to gas turbine  and materials  industries
           (Technology transfer)                                     r
         • Organizing conferences on ceramic turbines

In addition to Army sponsored studies of basic  processing  technology in
silicon nitride and silicon carbide, under ARPA funding, AMMRC has  been
conducting investigations  into design, analysis, and  mechanical properties
characterization procedures for high performance structural  ceramics.  In the
area of properties measurements,  a variety of stress  states  have been studied.
This includes flexure tests on various sizes of beams and  two  types of tension
experiments.  Conventional contoured tension configurations  as well as thinning
hydroburst tests have been completed on several types of silicon nitride and
silicon carbide.  Ring tests have been conducted on hot pressed silicon nitride
(HS-130)  and chemical vapor deposited silicon carbide.

In the area of probability based  analysis, reliability equations have now been
programmed to treat all types of  statistical distributions,  including empirical
probability data.  The treatment  is based on numerical integration  techniques
and transformation equations.  Emphasis of the  work in probability  theories
will now  be on the algebra of non-normal functions and application  of various
approximate solution techniques to problems  of  fracture, creep and  combined
stress failure.  Future properties characterization will deal  with  high  tempera-
ture materials properties.

Figures 96, 97, and 98 indicate current in-house studies,  outline  the  general
program and indicate missing design information in our Mechanics of Brittle
Materials studies.

Most recently EPA has requested that AMMRC prepare a  planning document  relating
to ceramics technology.
                                    -150-

-------
MECHANICAL
PROPERTIES
FRACTURE
BEHAVIOR
NONDESTRUCTIVE
EVALUATION
    CURRENT STUDIES

 TENSION (TWO TYPES)

 FLEXURE
(1/3, 1/4 POINT LOADS)
                                                                   RESULT
                             TORSION
                             HIGH FREQUENCY FATIGU
 WORK OF RUPTURE
 CRACK INITIATION AND.
 PROPAGATION
 STUDY'CRITICAL DEFECT
 CORRELATE WITH
 MECHANICAL PROPERTIES
STANDARD TESTS
                                 DESIGN DATA
SIGNIFICANCE OF
FLAWS
                    Fig. 96   Statistical Evaluation of Ceramics

-------
STRENGTH
•VARIABILITY IN LOADS'

MATERIAL PROPERTIES'
                                      9
                  ANALYSIS6
FRACTURE
•CRITICAL DEFECT SIZES

 INSPECTION PERIODS*
                 •LIFE PREDICTION"'
CREEP
                                CLOSED FORM
                                SOLUTIONS

                                APPROXIMATE
                                METHODS
                                                              nv
TORSION AND
CONSTITUTIVE EQUATIONS\l
                                ALGEBRA OFQV
                                NON-NORMAL
                                FUNCTIONS
                  RESPONSE UNDER
                  VARYING LOADS
  • Currently planned in ARPA  Program
  x Not currently addressed by ARPA Program
  Q R&D capabilities known to exist elsewhere
  v R&D capabilities at AMMRC
 Fig. 97  Design and Analysis of Brittle Materials AMMRC Probability Based Analysis
                            -152-

-------
• FAILURE THEORY FOR COMBINED STRESSDV
• CREEP LAWS (TENSION, TORSION,  COMPRESS ION)
• FATIGUE CRACK PROPAGATION - FRACTURE MECHANICS PREDICTION0^

          a R&D capabilities at AMMRC
          v R&D capabilities known to exist elsewhere
                     Fig. 98  Missing Data
                             -153-

-------
Analysis of  the  Potential for Ceramics in Automotive Gas Turbine Engines:  The
objective of the survey is to prepare an in-depth critical assessment and
planning document aimed at delineating t-he technology developments required
to ensure expeditious :ind efficient application of ceramics materials to
alternate automotive power sources.  This document will address:  potential
applications, available materials, pacing materials problems, current status
of ceramic component development and testing, pacing processing and produci-
bility problems, and design approaches Cor maximizing reliability.  Specific
research and development tasks and suggested vendors, as well as materials
supply, engineering, and manufacturing sources and deficiencies will be
enumerated.   Priorities and costing for the suggested program will be provided.
The program will consider the time fratne between the present and five years
hence.  It is anticipated that copies of the document will be distributed in
July 1974.

Contents of the  study are illustrated in Fig. 99 through 102.  The potential
applications, materials, problems, available ceramics and current status of
component development will be described (Fig. 99).  Pacing materials problems
will be identified on a component-by-component basis (Fig. 100).  Materials
and processes with approximate temperature limitations  (Fig. 101) will be
documented.  A summary of the general content of the document is illustrated
in Fig. 102.  It is anticipated that the survey will be of interest to the gas
turbine industry; the opportunity  to participate in this work is appreciated.

Questions and Comments:  None

J.   Continuously Variable Transmission Program, by Dyer Kenney. EPA
Proposals are being evaluated for  the first phase of a  possible  two phase
program.  A recent study for EPA by Mechanical Technology Incorporated and
Su.,dstrand,  Inc. concluded that it it, possible with present technology to
build continuously variable transmissions which could improve fuel economy by
25 to 307,.  Also, the most viable types are the hydromechanical and the traction.
Two contractors  (one for each type) will be selected for Phase I.
                                     -154-

-------
           » POTENTIAL APPLICATIONS'
                                    •COMPONENTS
Ul
m
I
          o GENERAL PACING MATERIALS
            PROBLEMS
           • AVAILABLE CERAMICS
• CURRENT STATUS OF
  COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT -
  AND TESTING

• PACING PROCESSING AND
  PRODUCIBILITY PROBLEMS
          • DESIGN AND RELIABILITY
   MECHANICAL PROPERTIES

   CHEMICAL PROPERTIES

   PHYSICAL PROPERTIES

^SUITABILITY

   SUPPLY

   VOLUME
   COSTS
   STATE OF CONFIDENCE

   KNOWN CAPABILITIES

   KNOWN PROBLEMS
                                               UNKNOWNS (BEST GUESS)
                                               COMPONENT
                    MATERIALS
                                               TEST METHODOLOGY
                                    STATISTICAL EVALUATION
                                    OF MATERIALS

                                    NONDESTRUCTIVE
                                    EVALUATION

                                    ANALYTIC METHODOLOGY
                                    AMD VARIANCE
ENVIRONMENTS

ENVIRONMENT

FABRICATION
TECHNOLOGY


NOW
1 - 2 YEARS
3 - 5 YEARS


'COMPONENTS
MATERIALS
ENVIRONMENT

PROCESSES
                                  RELIABILITY
                                  ANALYSIS

                                  OPTIMIZATION OF
                                  TEST AND ANALYSIS
                                  PROCEDURES
                             Fig. 99  Ceramics for Small Gas Turbine Applications

-------
 PROPERTIES

MECHANICAL
PROPERTIES
COMPONENTS
CHEMICAL
PROPERTIES
PHYSICAL
PROPERTIES
  STATORS
  OTHER COMPONENTS
 • Currently planned in the ARPA Program
 x Not currently addressed by ARPA Program
 + Only partially addressed by ARPA Program
 v R&D capabilities at AMMRC
 a R&D capabilities known to exist elsewhere
 o No known capabilities in  this area
 PACING MATERIALS  PROBLEMS

 INCREASE DENSITY (STRENGTH)8
 OF INJECTION MOLD  RBSN
 IMPROVE CREEP RESISTANCE®
 OF RBSN AT 2400 F

 EVALUATE EFFECTS OF THERMAL
 AND MECHANICAL (INCLUDING
 ACOUSTIC) FATIGUE ON
 STRENGTH OF RBSN AND SIC
 FABRICATED BY VARIOUS
 FORMING TECHNIQUES
 INVESTIGATE EFFECTS OF+VD
 EXPOSURE TO VARIOUS
 TURBINE ATMOSPHERES (I.E..
 DIFFERENT FUELS AND
 ADDITIVES)  ON ROOM
 TEMPERATURE AND HIGH
 TEMPERATURE STRENGTH
 AND MECHANICAL PROPERTIES
 (INCLUDE STATIC FATIGUE DUE
 TO MOISTURE FOR VARIOUS
 GRADES OF RBSN AND SIC)

•SIMILAR BREAKOUT
            Fig. 100  "Spiderchart"for Pacing Materials Problems
                                   -156-

-------
CERAMIC
COMPONENT
1ST STAGE
STATOR
2ND STAGE
STATOR
1ST STAGE
ROTOR
2ND STAGE -
ROTOR
1ST STAGE
SHROUD
2ND STAGE
SHROUD
INLET NOSE
CONE
COMBUSTOR
REGENERATORS
MATERIALS
SOURCES
MATERIAL
.MAX.
PART
TEMP.
0F
2400
2100
2300
2000
2300
2000
2500
3000
1800

Si3N4
V
V/
V
V
V
V
V



SiC


X
X



X


L-A-S








0

PROCESS
COLO
PRESSING




V
V




SLIP
CASTING
V
V
V
y
V
V

X


INJ.
MOLDING
V
^
V
V


V



HOT
PRESSING


V
N/






CHEM.
VAP.
DEP,


X
X






PAPER
WRAPPING



*




0

GLASS
FORMING








0

Data from Mr. A. F. McLean
               Fig.  101   Materials  and Processes for Ceramic Components for Ford
                          Ceramic Engine Operating at T.I.T. of 2500°F Uncooled

-------
00
~-^APPtlCATIONS
I ANALYS?S^»^^

CRITICAL
FTOPERTIES

IMPORTANT
PROPERTIES

CANDIDATE
CERAMICS

AVA'cABLl
M'jflJFACTURTNC
UCHNIOUf

COSTS

SOURCES

STATUS of
CURRINT DEMO.
PROCRA.MS -
LOCATION
PLANMD EFFORTS
SUGCtSrEO
PRIORITIZED
ADDITIONAL RIO
PROGRAMS
STATORS
•HIGH TtMP(RATURt
CAPAIIUTY
imiRMAL SHOCK AND
TMERMAl fATICUl
RCSISIANCE
CORROSION -fROSION
RlSISTANCt IN
luRsiNt ATMOSPHCR:
KASC Or FABRICABIUTV
LOW TlKRWAl EXPANSION
IMPACT RESISTANCE
MRINCTM >«,OOPPSI
•RBSN
SIC
CRVSIA1
SINTI'.IO
">\ AI'MS
»l N
uCLASS CERAMICS IAT
LOWER TEMPERATURES)
•RBSN
INJECTION MOID
SLIP CAST
BISQUE flRt AND
MACHINE
ISOSTAIIC PRESS
PROPRIETARY
METHODS
•SIC
SINTER
SLIP CAST AND
SINTT.R
RBSN
»?/STATOR IN LOTS
Of 200.000
IAME ESTIMATl)
FORD MOTOR COMPANY
NORTON COMPANY
AMC LIMITED
RUN » TOO F T. I.T. '
~/IOOHR STATIC
~s » HK DYNAMIC
~?ro n cms
FORD MOTOR COMPANY


ROTORS
















SHROUDS
















COM1USTORS
















DUCTING
















RCCCWRATORS
• HIGH TIMPIRATURC
CAPABILITY
• LOW THtRMAl
EXCURSION
• THERViAl SHOCK
RESISTANCE

• CORROSION RESISTANCE
Ni, S, Pb OR OTHER
FUEL ADDITIVES
• LAS
• MAS
• AI-!ITANATt
• RBSN










RECUPIRATORS
• HIGH HMPIRATURI
CAPABILITY
• THERMAL SHOCK
RESISTANCE

• CORROSION RESISTANCE
Nl. S, rt OR OTHER
FUEL ADDITIVES
• LAS
• MAS
• AI-riTANATI
• RBSN
• SIC










SEALS AND
IEARINCS
















INSULATION

















                                 Fig.  102    Ceramics  for Small  Gas  Turbine Applications

-------
Phase I  is  scoped  as  a  6-month,  8400 man-hour effort to do a preliminary
design for  an I.C.  engine  and for the AAPS candidate engines.  It is hoped
that one transmission can  be designed which can do the job, with minor modifi-
cations, for both  the I.C. engine and the alternate engines.  Then a final
design will be made,  probably for the I.C. engine, because an I.C. engine
will be  used for subsequent tests.
                                     ^
Phase II (optional depending on Phase I results) will be a 12-month effort
to (1) fabricate and  (2)  test two of the transmissions on dynamometer--both
steady-state and transient tests will be compared against an automatic trans-
mission on  an I.C. engine.  Task 3 is to test the transmission in a vehicle
to verify performance and  fuel economy.  Baseline tests will also be run with
a vehicle and an automatic transmission.  Task 4 will be a cost estimate for
1,000,000 units per year of a continuously variable transmission.  Deliverable
items are two transmissions, critical spare parts, final report with log books
and analyses, and  vehicles purchased.

The contract is to be awarded before the end of this Fiscal Year.

K.   Potential Health Hazard of Nickel Compound Emissions from Automotive Gas
     Turbine Engines  Using Nickel Oxide Base Regenerator Seals by R.Schulzf EPA
The EPA National Environmental Research Center surveyed the toxicologic
literature  on the  carcinogenicity of NiO (Reference 1 - Appendix D).  The
principal concerns found over the release of additional NiO to the atn-osphere
were as follows:
          • The compound porduces muscle sarcomas when injected into rats.
         • Nickel oxide may function as a cocarcinogen when introduced into
            the lungs with a known carcinogen.
                                   3
         • Low level (100-150 Pg/m ) nickel oxide exposure may result in
            histological changes in bronchi and alveoli.
         • Nickel oxide  is cleared relatively slowly from the respiratory tract.
         • Cigarette smoking may impair clearance of nickel oxide and potenti-
            ate tissue  damage.
         • Nickel oxide has been implicated by association in the higher  inci-
            dence  of  nasal and lung cancer observed among nickel workers.
                                     -159-

-------
Estimates of NiO emission rates from gas turbine powered autos have been made
on the basis of wear rate calculations and from preliminary testing of a
prototype gas turbine car with NiO based regenerator seals.  From these
estimates it appears that an emission factor of 0.003 to 0.005 grams NiO per
mile could be expected.  While further seal development and testing of other
prototype gas turbine vehicles might result in lower NiO emission rates, it
seemed worthwhile Co determine if emissions of NiO  from automobiles at a level
of approximately 0.005 grates NiO/mile pose an unacceptable risk.
.The industrial threshold  limit value  (TLV)  for nickel and  its soluble salts is
 1000 ug/m  for 8 hour*
 tions are as follows:
1000  ug/m   for 8 hours  per day.   The present urban ambient nickel concentra-
          • National  1968 arithmetic  average      0.036 Vg/m
          • 1968 maximum                          1.300 ug/m
                                                           3
          • 1969 maximum quarterly               0.330 gg/m

 NiO exposures were estimated  (Reference  2  - Appendix D)  based upon  the exten-
 sive-projections developed  by the  EPA Office  of Research and Development
 which modeled sulfate exposures  from  oxidation catalysts.  The projected expo-
 sures were made for NiO on  and near major  arterial throughways, assuming 257.
 of vehicle miles with turbine engine  vehicles,  and NiO emissions are 0.005 gm/
 mile from the turbine engine  vehicles and  zero from the  remaining vehicles.
 The estimated incremental exposures for  worst meteorological conditions are:
          • 1 hour peak                          12.4  wgin/m
          • 24 hour average                     1.45  Wgm/m
          • Incremental 24  hour                  0.88  ugm/m

 It is concluded that  the emission  of  NiO from automotive turbine engines of
 0.005 grams/mile and  the attendant exposure of the public  to the incremental
 increases of this metal oxide is an unnecessary risk.  Evidence against nickel
 oxide is sufficient to warrant development of alternate  materials for use  in
 automobile turbine engine rubbing  seals.  Since urban ambient  levels of nickel
 are relatively high at present,  due consideration should be given to any sources
 likely  to increase these  levels.
                                      -160-

-------
While it is probably safe to assume that we will not have 25% of the light-duty
motor vehicles mileage attributable f.o turbine powered vehicles for a decade,
at least, it is appropriate to identify the emission levels of non-regulated
pollutants from all alternate power systems early in the development stages in
order to properly assess the total environmental impact of their potential use.
NiO emissions from turbines is but one example of this concern,and it should
encourage emissions characterization of the other alternate powerplants cur-
rently under intensive development.

It is recommended that the following be pursued by industry and government as
part of their automotive gas turbine development programs:
          • Consider alternate seal materials that do not pose a health hazard
            or make design changes to minimize or reduce nickel emissions.
          • Identify the form of nickel compounds emitted.
It is further recommended that EPA expand the non-regulated emissions charac-
terization program relative to automotive gas turbines and other alternate
powerplants.  Also, the National Academy of Science should be advised of this 	
study fay EPA so that" they~may consider this issue within the perspective of
their study on nickel.

Questions and Comments
Question:  What was the source of the 1968 maximum and the 1969 maximum
     quarterly concentrations?
Answer:  These concentrations were encountered in Portland, Maine and New York
     City, but the source of the pollutants is not known.  EPA is on the alert
     for any sort of contaminant which represents a health hazard.  Any marked
     increase in a known pollutant is investigated as to source and cause.

Question (Paul Reynolds, Jet Propulsion Laboratory):  Has anyone identified a
     problem with fuel catalysts used with stainless steel in the exhaust system?
Answer:  The pollution could be in the form of participates or a compound like
     nickel carbonyl (very toxic) which can be produced by carbon monoxide in
     contact with nickel particles.  However, this is not believed to be a pro-
     blem with gas turbines because the exhaust temperatures are far above the
     100 to 120°F dissociation temperature.  This has not been investigated.
                                     -161-

-------
Question:  Have nickel emissions been measured around airports where aircraft
     turbine engines have been  running?
Answer:  EPA has a network of stations measuring various pollutants in the air;
     some of these are undoubtedly  near  airports.   No correlation in the
     vicinity of airports has been  reported or investigated as far as is known
     at  this time.                       •*

L.   Ceramic Materials Development, by John Egenolf, Advanced Materials
     Engineering. Ltd..  England (Guest PresentationF
In the three and a half  years since it was organized, AME has focused primarily
on the processing and fabrication  techniques for the practical application of
reaction bonded silicon  nitride.   One of the major application areas is power
systems  where overall economics is  of prime importance.  Some of the early
vanes and a nozzle ring  are  shown  in Fig. 103.  The nozzle ring (for Plessey)
is 6 to 7  inches outside diameter.   Using the fabrication characteristics of
silicon nitride, the molded  blades  are bonded co the outer and inner shrouds
(cut £ ram a solid) during the r.itriding process,  RBSN is not being recommended
for rotating components.

Also shown  in Fig. 103 are  typical  burner liners in which thin film and bandage
wrapping techniques, developed  earlier for heat exchangers, have been applied.

Much of  the early thin film technology was developed in conjunction with British
Leyland  requirements for regenerator disks.  Early disks were single pieces,
15-inch  OD.  Interest in recuperators also focused attention en reducing the
permeability of the ceramic  materials.  This led to work on alloying silicon
nitride  and densifying or sealing  the material.  By matching the thermal coef-
ficients of expansion of both  the  densifying agent and the silicon nitride,
some of  the thermal shock loss  in  the material property was restored.

Some of  the later, modular  designs  of regenerators and recuperators aimed at
mitigating  thermal stress and repair cost are shown in Fig. 104.  Also indi-
cated is a  foam matrix,  as  well as  the extruded honeycomb matrix, which can be
                                     -162-

-------
0
 ombustion
chamber
hers
nozzles
and blades
   Plesiey Co. Ltd.. M. T. U.. M.A.N. and other customers tor thy kind use ol photographs.
        Fig. 103 Typical Ceramic Components


             -163-

-------
regenerator disc and drums
                           Fig.  104   Heat Exchanger Models
                                          -164-

-------
                                                                    Motor Vehicle  Emission Lab
                                                                              LIBRARY
used not only .ror regenerator segments  but  r.lso for high temperature insulation
systems.   It Is believed  that silicon nitride has an important role to play in
future heat exchangers.

Questions  and Comments;   None

M.   General Purpose  Programmable  Analog Control - by D.  Court,  Ultra Electronics,
Inc.. England (Guest  Presentation)
Electronic analog control systems  have  been used successfully to control gas
turbine engines for  industrial  and vehicular applications.   Their initial
introduction arose largely from the need to control engine  temperature accu-
rately  for both economic  and durability reasons.  The ability of electronic
controllers, however, to  accept readily any input as a control parameter and
use it as  the basis  of control  in  a particular mode of operation has meant that
in many cases, an electronic controller currently offers the most economic
control  for  a given  application.

A typical  automotive gas  turbine engine control system achieved electronically
is shown  in  Fig.  105.  Input signals on the left-hand side:   from the accelera-
tor pedal; the gas generator speed, NG; the intake air temperature, TA;  the
turbine entry temperature, TT;  and the  output shaft speed,  NQ; are converted
into voltage signals.  These are used as inputs to an electronic analog com-
puter which  computes the  correct fuel flow and nozzle actuator position from
these inputs.  Electrical outputs  to drive the fuel metering valve and the
nozzle actuator are  jhown on the right-hand side of Fig. 105.

Controllers  of this  type  possess two major characteristics,  their low cost and
their flexibility.   The low cost has arisen because the basic blocks in Fig. 105
are largely  constructed from semi-conductor integrated circuits.  During the
last few years, the  overall market for  these circuits has greatly increased in
volume, and  extremely low unit  costs have resulted.  The second advantage,
flexibility, is particularly desirable  and economical during the development
of a control, because, as with  an electronic analog computer, changes in control
schedules  can be achieved with  modest changes in the electrical interconnections
between the hardware.
                                     -165-

-------

JN
tr~^



"c


\AA«
VW|
Tfc



* • H

JUlfi
No

ACCEL PEDAL


©
FftEO TO
CONVERTER


ULET

CONOlTlONBC

©
COLO
JUNCTION
CCMP I
CHOPPER AMP
©
FREO TO
VOLTAGE
CONVERTED




©
V


$

HCHEST
JfUEu
KMS
LOOC


©
> LOWEST
.FUEL
WNS
• LOOC






G
RETARD
LOGIC



i> ki^
PCWEft
'AMP /

METERING
VALVE









©
POWER
VrfP /
NOZZLE
ACTUAVOH


Fig. 105   Basic Electronic Analog Control  System
                         -166-

-------
During  the  last  few years,  however,  there have been further developments of
electronic  controllers with the two  objectives of:  (a) reducing their cost,
and (b)  increasing their  flexibility.   The approach that has generally been
adopted to  achieve these  ends  is that  of "programmability" and sequential
operation of  the computational elements.  Instead of performing the control
calculations  simultaneously and in parallel using a large number of computa-
tional  elements  as shown  in Fig. 105,  a single computational element is used
which is under the control  of  a stored program.  This performs each of the
required calculations, stores  the intermediate results,  avid finally produces
the required  fuel flow and  nozzle actuator position.  The sequence of calcu-
lations is  performea  repetitively at high speed, so that the fuel flow and
nozzle  position  are updated at intervals much shorter than the response times
of the  engine being controlled.

An approach like this has the  ability  to achieve the two objectives for the
following reasons.  First,  a single  computational element is "time-shared"
between the various control loops, and, for fairly complex control systems,
this can lead to a decrease in the overall volume of electronics.  Secondly,
the control laws are  completely defined by the stored program; thus, by chan-
ging the stored  program,  the control laws ca.: be completely changed.  Within
the constraints  of  the sensor inputs and actuator outputs provided initially,
the flexibility  is unlimited.

A schematic of the general  purpose programmable analog control is shown in
Fig. 106.   This  control system provides the following:
         • The  optimum solution to  the twin problems of control capability
            and  low cost.
         • Calculations  performed directly on sensor signals in analog form
            to provide analog  signals  that can be used directly to drive the
            system actuators.   The basic elecent of this system is an analog
            computer  which  is  programmed from a stored digital program.
         9 A programmable  system a  control engineer can understand immediately
           and  operate within hours.
         • A final system, the size,  cost and reliability cf which is attractive.
                                     -167-

-------
 SIGNAL
 CONDITIONING
                           DIGITAL PROGRAM COUNTER
                                         |  JUMP TO j
                           DIGITAL PROGRAM MEMORY
                 12 INPUT
                    SWITCH
                                ANALOG
                                ARITHMETIC UNIT
                 OUTPUT
                 SWITCH
                                                                    -  16
                                                                    r  OUTPUTS
23     —
INPUTS ,
                                                         4,  8 WAY
                                                         M'XERS
                                                                22
                 5,8 WAY
                 M'XERS
                        24 BIT INSTRUCTION WORD
        INPUT
                               GAIN
                                               OUTPUT!
                  [MAX GAIN (1111111111)= 10.23]
N
 gg
                           EXAMPLE FUNCTIONS
                    	15
                    L DEMAND
SPEED
DEMAN
  IL
FUEL
DEMAND
ROG.
».
*.
3.
0 0
0 0
ro"
1 1
1 1
0 1
0 0
0 0
0 1
0 0
0 I
0 1
1 1
1 0
1 0
0 0
1 0
1 0
1 0
0 I
0 1
0 0


Ngg
10 1 1
1 0 1

1 1


000


            Fig. 106   General Purpose Programmable Analog Control
                                  -168-

-------
For more detailed  description  r information see (1) "Developments in Pro-
grammable Analog Control Systems" by J. R. Dent and A. .. .  Bergman, Ultra
Electronics,  Ltd..   36 Mansfield Road, Western Avenue, Acton, London N30RT,
England, this is A.S.M.C.  Paper No. 74 GT 117, presented at 1974 Gas Turbine
Conference and  Products Show in Zurich.

Questions and Comcents
Comment  (T.  Sebestyen, EPA):  This system has been used in a number of practical
     control applicstions including gas turbines and industrial chemical
     processes.
                                     -169-

-------
IV.  RANKINE ENGINE PROGRAMS

A.   Overview of Trends, Objectives, and Status, by Steve Luchter^ EPA
As indicated in Fig. 107, the Rankine Program was initiated with a broad base
of technology and system contractors.  Four preprototype system developments
(covering water-base fluid reciprocating and turbine; and organic fluid
reciprocating and turbine approaches) were carried essentially through
January 1974.  In February 1974, approximately  in accordance with the sche-
dule in Fig. 108, decisions were made:
          • To pursue the water base, reciprocating system through the proto-
            type system evaluation with Scientific Energy Systetas, Inc.
          • To use  the organic, reciprocating system as a back-up with Thermo
            Electron Corporation.
          0 To evaluate  the prototype system in a "compact" car rather than
            the standard vehicle as  originally  planned.

Since the last Coordination Conference  (October 1974), activities have focused
primarily on two ireas:
          * Continued testing on preprototype engines  to extract the maximum
            information  frot.i them.   Emphasis has been  on system dynamics and
            on the  valving of the organic  engine.
          • Design  of the Prototype  Engine.

Test results continue to show steady-state omission  levels well below  1977
Standards.  Steady-state fuel economy results are approaching  those of spark
ignition engines.

Use of the preprototype  hardware will continue. The engine will be installed
in a vehicle for further development of  the control  system.  Called the  Control
Development Simulator,  it is expected to  be operational on a dynamometer by  the
end of 1974.

Prototype development will continue  in  parallel.
                                      -170-

-------
                     ENVIRONMENTAL 2BOTECTIOH
                                 AGENCY
          NASALERC  |	
  CONTRACT    TECHNICAL     R$D
MONITORING    SUPPORT    PROGRAMS
                          TECHNOLOGY PROGRAMS |
                                         h SOLAR

                                           GEO SCIENCE
                                           LTD

                                         -PAXVE


                                         -MTTELLfc
                          SYSTEM CONTRACTQBS
        WATER BASEl
ORSAMIC WITH RECIPROCATOR j
   I5FEAM ENGINE SY5TCMS
             -RICARDO

             - AMERICAN MOTORS
             -ESSO
             - BENDIX
   I THERMO ELECTRON
          -FORD
[CONDENSER I
                                              MODELING
                                                STUDIES
                                  GARRETT
                                  'A1RESEARCH
                  I
GE
                               LUBRlCATIONll FLUIDS][FBEDPUMP|

                                 [GENERAL     L
                                  ELECTRIC
                                                                       -MONSANTO
   | ORGANIC WITH TURBIMB
        lABROJET!
              ^
                                       \ /
                                       K
                                                                                               '
                            Fig. 107  Ranklr.e System Development Team

-------
 EMISSIONS
PEVELOPMENT'.
 EM/SS/ONS.
 ECONOMY, A/0/5£

VEH/CL£
                                                  /97S
                                                  GEPO&T
                      Fig, 108  Rankine System Schedule

-------
B.   Water  Base  Reciprocating  System,  by Jack H.  Vernon and Roger Dernier.
    Scientific  Energy  Systems,  Inc.
Perspective on Ranktne  Development:  Although progress has been made on
vehicular steam  engines by  numerous  people and organizations since the early
I900's  (Stanley, Doble,  White,  Besler  and GM, to name a few),  it is only over
the last three years  of the AAPS programs, that a concerted effort has been
made to bring it all  together.   By focusing the latest technology on specific
goals and requirements  in a conscious  effort to develop a low pollution
Rankine engine,  potentially competitive with the I.e. automotive engine,
remarkable  progress has been made in a short time with nominal investment.
The incentives motivating this effort  stem from the present environmental  laws.
Although the present  rate of improvement and progress is relatively high,  a
fully developed, competitive engine  is still in the distant future; a large
amount  of work remains  to be done.

Features of SES  System:  The following lists the principal features of the SES
Preprototype System  (Fig. 109):
         • Working  fluid:   pure water - 1000°F,  1000 Poig at boiler exit
   *9»
         • Fail-safe freeze protection:  working inventory drained to heated
           eump on  shut down  - flexible bladder in sump for emergency
         • Reciprocating expander:  4 cyl in-line - 135 cu. in. displacement,
           trunk  piston lubricated  with natural base-stock oil, uniflow
           exhaust,  variable  cut-off  control, plain shell type bearings,  and
           cam  and  tappet  valve train
         0 Design point:  EPA/AAPS  vehicle specification
           Maximum  steam flow - 20  Ib./min.
         • Maximum expander power:   (85°F ambient, high gear)
           Cross  hp                 " 158 ;* 1500 rpro
           Net  hp Into transmission • 138 (3 1500 rpta
         • Cospact,  low emission boiler; 19.5-ln.  diameter by 18.5-ln. long;
           heat Input  to water at maximum power • 1.58 x 10  HTU/hr.
         • Condenser heat  rejection at maximum power * 1.21 x 10  BTU/hr.
                                    -173-

-------
Fig. 109   SES Automotive Steam System Mock-Up

-------
          •  Simple  feedwater pump with fixed displacement,  direct drive,
            efficient flow control by inlet valve modulation
          •  Practical installation with good accessibility,  only minor chassis
            changes,  conventional arrangement,  good cooling air flow,  and
            conventional seals (not hermetic)

Current Status and  Recent Achievements:  The data shown in  Figs. 110 and 111,
based on the best available steady-state laboratory data, show that  emissions
should be well below statutory 1977 standards.   Fuel economy up to 15.45 mpg
is shown in  Fig.  112.  Fuel economy projections, based on steady-state perfor-
mance, for the Federal Driving Cycle, are shown in Fig. 113.

Cumulative development test hours to date are as follows:
          •  System  Testing               391 hours
            (Current Build    115)
          •  Single  Cylinder              847 hours
            (Over 30 hp        33)
            (Rated, 40 hp       2\)
            (Max  Single Build 200)
          •  Vapor Generators            2035 hours
            (Max  Single Build 905)
          •  Prototype Pumps             3930 hours
            (Max  Single Build 600)

Some of the  improvements in expander efficiency and auxiliary power  require-
ments are sho^ti in  Figs. 114 and 115.

Controls are an important part of the current test and development effort:
          •  Automatic start-up has been incorporated in the control  system
          •  Idle  steam conditions reached in 19 seconds from key "on"
          •  Flame holder temperature is used for closed loop fuel-air  ratio
            control
                                     -175-

-------
to
Q
U.
<
O
2
i/l
en
Z
UJ
O

Of.
UJ
Q.
100

 90

 80


 70

 60

 50
 30

 20

 10
         0   10 20   30   40   50  60   70    80
                   MILES PER HOUR

    Fig. 110   Steady-State Emissions  (Based on Measured
              Steady-State Emissions  and Current System
              Fuel Economy)
                        -176-

-------
SES PROJECTION    1976 STANDARDS

  NO* = 0.18            0.40         GRAMS/MILE
  CO  = 0.43            3.40         GRAMS/MILE
  UHC = 0.18            0.41         GRAMS/MILE

COMPUTATION BASED ON MEASURED  EMISSIONS
FROM PREPROTOTYPE STEAM GENERATOR,  10
MPG AVERAGE FUEL ECONOMY, 25%  AVERAGE
FIRING RATE.   INCLUDES MEASURED  UHC OF
0.50 GRAMS ON IGNITION AND  0.25  GRAMS
CN SHUT-DOWN,
   Fig. Ill  Cold Start Ftu^ral Driving Cycle Emissions
                    -177-

-------
   z
   o
   o
   Q£.
   UJ
   a.
   to
   (U
       18
       16
12

10
 8

 6
              1
            I
                   CURRENT TEST
                    -CORRECTED  CD
                           RAW  DATA
                            POINTS
    973  TEST
_L
              10
                                  70
                  80
         20   30  *+0   50  60
           MILES PER  HOUR
CD CORRECTED  FOR VALVE STEM  SEALS
 AND  DIRECT  STEAM LINE TO EXPANDER
Fig. 112  Steady State Road Load Fuel Economy (4600 Pound Vehicle)
                     -178-

-------
I
h-t

vO
VEHICLE:
SYSTEM:
DRIVE TRAIN:
EXPANDER  IDLE  SPEED:
                                     «4600 LB. TEST WEIGHT, 12.  FT* DRAG-AREA PRODUCT
                                     CURRENT PERFORMANCE
                                     3 SP. AUTO TRANS, 11.75" DIAM.  TORQUE CONVERTER.
                                     250 RPM.


                                                                 FDC  FUEL  ECONOMY
ACCESSORY  LOAD   W/0 AIR  COND.  (2)


ACCESSORY  LOAD  WITH AIR  COND.
                                             HOT START
                                                             10.22 MPG


                                                              8.64 MPG
                                                                            COLD START (1)
0.22 MPG


8.04 MPG
NOTES:     CD   STEAM GENERATOR WARM-UP OF 17 SEC, AT 80% OF  FULL

                FIRING RATE  (USING  0.065 GAL. FUEL).


           (2)   POWER OF 2 HP.  AT EXPANDER IDLE SPEED,  5 HP.  AT

                MAXIMUM SPEED  AND  LINEAR CHANGE WITH SPEED.


           (3)   POWER OF U HP.  AT EXPANDER IDLE SPEED,  15 HP. AT
                MAXIMUM SPEF.D AND LINEAR CHANGE WITH SPEED.
             Fig. 113  Federal Driving Cycle Fuel Economy Projected from
                      Steady State Performance
                                                                                              m
                                                                                       V
                                                                                       cr

-------
00
o
              o
                 80


                 70



                 60
y 50
o

it 40
UJ


I 3°

< 20
CL

S  10
         i    i   i    i    I   i    i    i    i   r

                    CURRENT CONFIGURATION
                       I
            _L
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
                       10  20  30 40  50  60 70  80  90 100  110  120 130

                              EXPANDER GROSS HORSEPOWER
                               Fig. 114  Expander Efficiency

-------
  4.0
1   I   i   r
                          I—I—I
                               A
Q.
Z
:
tr
LJ

o
a.
  3.0
                      *>/
                    JF/

               &* /     
^
•^^i
  2.0
x

<  1.0
           200   400   600   8OO   1000   1200

               STEAM FLOW RATE  LB/HR
             Fig.  115   Auxiliary Power Rsequirenents


                       -181-

-------
         • Only two driver  inputs
                ~ Key on/off
                — Power  demand  (accelerator pedal)
         • Autooatic cold start enrichment from mixture temperature signal
         • Basic control mode  is anticipatory with  temperature and pressure
           feedback
                                    ^
         • Control options
                — Driver input  to  expander cut-off  or firing rate
                — Active evaporator bypass control
                — Temperature  control at superheater inlet or outlet

The preliminary system  transient response is too slow.  Transient loop tescs
are in progress incorporating  the boiler feed pump,  the boiler, the steam
throttle  and  the controls.   The  key factor determining the response is the
metal  energy  change with  load.   Secondary factors are:  maximum firing rate,
firing rate of change,  control  strategy, and base load (i.e., like a "flight
idle").

The strategy  for  improved boiler response is through energy leveling (by
reduced tube  weight,  revised pass order, and passive evaporator by-pass) and
control options (active evaporator  by-pass control and variable boiler pressure
to level  energy change).  The  following comparison of the current Model 5 with
the new Model 7 (see  Fig. llf.)  boiler indicates some of these improvements:

                                                         Model 5    Model 7
         • Maximum steam flow,  Ib./min.                     20         20
         • Tubing weight,  Ib.                                98         61
         • Metai energy  change, idle to full load,  BTU   1,430        100
         • Superheater temperature control point          exit      inlet

Prototype Compact Car:  A pealed vsrsion of the Preprotocype Engine is to be
installed and evaluated in a compact car.  ErA performance specifications for
the compact car are:
                                     -182-

-------
I
h-*
00

I

DRIVER
DEMAND
I
4 r

^
**•*.
u^
FIRING
STEAM TO
>

t


f— w r*i A *tr\r~n
	 r



\
\
1
i
> 	 ^

"





, 	 y
->
.
SUPERHEATER
TEMP.
CONTROL

N 	 .
t

— ™> <••
•»» •_
*•• •••



—


t

^N

!• •*.
•^ •*•
« BB

••• •••
••• -fc-
_•> ••-
CB>B —


t
—

••»

i














k

•••





WATER
FLOW
CONTROL
T
1
1
EVAPORATOR
TEMP.
CONTROL



EXHAUST
, FEED (Ot
4--
1
W
»-
u
a.
a.
^J
DRIVER
DEMAND
MODULATION CONTROL
                                       Fig.  Ii6   Model 7 Boiler and Control Strategy

-------
          •  Emissions  to be % of 1977 standards
          •  Standing start:   440 feet in 10 seconds
                             60 mph in 17.5 seconds
          •  Merging traffic - 25 to 70 mph in 20 seconds
          •  DOT high speed pass in 17 seconds (max 80 mph)
          •  30 percent grade at 5 mph
          •  Fuel economy at 50 mph, 20 mpg
          •  FDC fuel economy, 15 mpg

The base vehicle is a 1975 Plymouth Valiant.  The engine power and configuration
will be as follows:
          •  Gross expander power - 90 hp
          •  Maximum steam flow of 800 Ib. per hour
          •  Basic engine arrangement and cycle will be scaled from the
            Preprototype Engine.
          •  Vapor generator - 17.5 in. diameter by 17 in. long, weight 52 Ibs.
          •  F.xpander - 4 cylinder, in-line^ G5 cu. in. _displacement,  4000 rptn,
            no step-up gear
          •  Condenser - single fan, aluminum core, 3.8 sq. ft., 4 in.  depth,
            20 fins per inch on air side
          •  Feedwater pump - present pump with reduced bore
          •  Transmission - production 3-speed automatic

A breakdown of projected vehicle weight  is as follows:
          • Base vehiclo without powerplant, WQ = 2131 Ib.
          a Prototype propulsion system
                 - Expander                                 225 Ib.
                 — Condenser & Fan                           60
                 — Vapor Generator                           52
                 — Feedpump                                  16
                 — Auxiliary Drives                          35
                 - Working Fluid, 4 gal.                     34
                                     -184-

-------
                 — Freeze Protection                         18
                 — Transmission                             180
                 — Miscellaneous                             80
                 — Vehicle Related (Exhaust, propshaft,
                   axle,  battery,  fuel & tank)              380
          • Propulsion System Weight                  Wp = 1080 (Comparable
                                                                weight for a
                                                                6 cylinder pro-
                                                                duction Valiant
                                                                is 1055 Ibs.)
          • Curb Weight                               Wc = 3211
          • Test Weight                               WT = 3611
          0 Gross Weight                              Wr = 3911
                                                       i?

Work in Progress
          • Continued durability development on preprototype hardware.
          • Controls development on chassis dynamometer.   Preprototype Engine
            being ins tailed-£n-Plymouth for the work — called Centre!—Develop-
            ment Simulator.
          • Light weight boiler for rapid throttle response (current tube
            bundle is 98 pounds);  light weight tube bundle is 61 pounds;
            compact car tube bundle is 35 pounds
          • Prototype design includes:
                 — improved economy with refined expander, valve train refine-
                   ments, and thermal isolation
                 — study of compact and standard car systems
                 — car selection and final prototype design in Fall 1974

Questions and Comments
Question (N.  Moore,  JPL):  How does the inlet valve unloading concept work on
     the feedwater pump?
                                     -185-

-------
Answer:   The inlet valve on each cylinder is a spring loaded ball valve.  Also
     at each inlet is an electric solenoid with a shaft which holds the valve
     open when activated.  By cycling the three solenoids with the control
     signal, the flow can be regulated in accordance with the demand of the
     control.

Question (Dr. J. E. Davoud, D-Cycle Power):  Have you considered going to
     higher cycle temperatures?
Answer;  Higher temperatures have been considered, but dropped, because the
     potential gain of perhaps 1 to 1% tnpg for a 200°F increase does not seem
     commensurate with the risks of wrecking the engine and getting into a
     lot of unknowns which would not help the program at this time.

Question (Scott Carpenter, Advanced Power Systems):  How were the reductions
     in the boiler weight  (90 Ibs. down  to 60 Ibs.) and the BTU energy loss
     (1400 BTU down to 100 BTU) achieved?
Answer:  The BTU reduction is not a loss, but is the amount of energy which
     is added to the tube  in the course  of getting up to the desired steam
     conditions.  The reductions were achieved primarily through smaller
     tubing in the economizer and the evaporator, aluminum finning on the
     economizer, and redistribution of the tube passes (for reducing energy
     change).  One of the  evaporator passes was put up by the fire.

Question (Paul Vickers, GM Research Center):  Why haven't vehicle emissions
     been measured?
Answer:  The engine has not been installed in a vehicle as yet.  Equipment
     for running transient tests will not be ready until next winter.  Stan-
     dard EPA emissions test equipment is installed and will be used.

Question (Comdr. E. Tyrrel, Dept. of Trade & Industry, England):  What type of
     water quality is required for this  engine?  Are there de-aerauion pro-
     visions, and what is  the boiler tube material?  C02 corrosion of ferritic
     materials is a problem over 600°F.  What is the thermodynamic efficiency
     of the cycle?
                                     -186-

-------
Answer:  Over-all thermal efficiency is  16-17%.   City water is run through a
     demineralizer.  No provision  is made to measure water quality.   Deposits
     from  the deroineralized city water have not  been observed.  The  boiler
     tubing material is stainless  steel.   No corrosion problems have been
     identified.  Tubes from a  boiler which ran  900 hours were cut up.   No
     problems were detected.  The  condenser pressure is a little over ambient
     at all times, 20  Psia.  A  de-aerator valve  is set to blow off non-
     condensable gases when the system is running.

Question  (R.  R. Stephenson, JPL):   Please clarify the time to get up to
     operating conditions.
Answer:  At present  it actually takes 19 seconds to get from the turn of the
     key up to 500 Psig and 500°F  idling conditions.  EPA, to account for
     warm-up  fuel consumption,  asks how long it  takes at an 80% firing rate
     to get up to 1000 Psig and 1000°F.   Some of the calculations show 17
     seconds.  This  has not yet been accomplished.  At present, it is esti-
     mated that another 2% to 3 seconds  are required to get to 1000  Psig and
     1000°F.

Question  (T.  Duffy,  Solar):  What  is the fuel flow at idle and what  are
     pressure and temperature goals in terms of  transient limits?
Answer;   Idle flow is  about 5 pounds per hour (uncertain).  It is intended to
     control  pressure  within +  50  Psi and temperature within + 50 F.  The
     tolerance of the  system  to such excursions  during acceleration and dece-
     leration is not yet  clear.

Question  (Dr. Max Bentele, Xatnag,  Inc.):  Why do you use an automatic 3-speed
     transmission when the inherent torque ratio of the steaoi expander is so
     good?
Answer:   If available, a  2-speed,  manual power-shift transmission without a
     torque converter  would be  best.  To eliminate the transmission or a gear
     change of some  sort  completely would probably be impractical because it
     would lead to an  oversize  condenser which would in turn be too large for
     the vehicle.
                                     r!87-

-------
Question (Dr. F.  Paul,  Carnegie Mellon University):  What are the response
     times with  the  controlled and uncontrolled vapor generator?
Answer;   Tests are sketchy in this area.   Largest step change so far was from
     idle to 60% power  while driving an eddy current dynamometer.  Estimates
     indicate about  a 3-second first order time constant on a controlled boiler.
   •  This is still very preliminary.
                                     3
Question (Dr. J.  E.  Davoud,  D-Cycle Power):  What is the basis for the road
     load horsepower versus  various speeds (i.e., the basis for the fuel
     economy curves  in  Fig.  112)?
Answer:   Road load horsepower versus speed figures were established by EPA and
     take into account  wind resistance as well as rolling resistance.  This
     seems to be generally accepted by people such as DOT and others in the
     industry.   Drive  train losses at 30 mph were taken as 83%.  This then is
     combined with  estimated auxiliary and accessory powers to get power
     required from the  expander and corresponding fuel economy.

Question (Mr. Jack Edwards,  Rohr Corp.):  What is the cranking time and starter
     horsepower?  Is thermal efficiency of the boiler compromised by reducing
     the thermal inertia of the boiler?
Answer:   It presently takes 19 seconds to get up to idle steam flow.  Approxi-
     mately another 10 seconds might be required to get the expander up to
     speed to drive accessories, etc.  A conventional starting motor, operating
     at a higher speed, is used.  The thermal efficiency of the boiler is
     compromised about 2% out of 92% at idle as a result of reducing its
     thermal inertia.

Question (Dr. Douglas  Court, Ultra Electronics):  Where do you expect to mount
     the "black box" controls in the vehicle installation?
Answer;   No attempt has been made yet at packaging or compacting the control
     system.
                                     -188-

-------
Question (Mr.  Tom Duffy, Solar):  What are the transient characteristics of the
     flame  holder temperature as these will have an important effect on your
     feedback control system?  Also, what approach is being used for flame
     detection?
Answer:   The automatic feedback system is being used in the starting cycle; it
     has a  3/4-second smooth response in going from idle to 100% fuel rate; it
     works  very well. A cadmium sulfide cell is used as a flame detector.

C.   Organic Reciprocating Engine, by Jack Armstrong, Thermo Electron Corp.
A schematic diagram of  the Theraao Electron, Organic Rankine Cycle Engine is
shown in Fig. 117.  The principal characterics of the Preprototype Engine are
as follows:
          • Working Fluid


          • Freezing Point
          • Lubricant

          • Thermal Stability

          • Reference Car and Transmission

          • Expander Gross  Shaft  Power
          • Peak Cycle Temperature
          • Peak Cycle Pressure
Fluorinol-85
85 mole 7, CF-CH^OH
15 mole 7. HO
-82°F
Commercial Refrigeration Oil
(Sun Oil Product)
Capsule tests indicate potential
for use to 660 F
1972 Ford Galaxie 500
3-Speed Automatic
145.5 hp
550°F
700 Psia
 Preprototype Engine Program;  The program  status  on  the  Preprototype Engine is
 as follows:
          • Fluorinol-85 baseline performance  has been established.  The  test
            range has  included cruise  speeds from idle to  70  mph  (level grade
            and acceleration), inlet pressures from  400-700  Psia,  and maximum
                                      -189-

-------
                CU»CR oxen
                 ASSEMBLY
        KHEHTUBNG
                                               NttKE Af)
                                                                          FMJTUBE
                                                                         CCNKNSER
Fig. 117    Thermo Electron Rankine Cycle Engine Schematic Diagram
                                 -190-

-------
           inlet temperatures to 625°F.  Expander driven auxiliaries include:
           condenser fans, feedpump, lube oil pump, alternator, and hydraulic
           pump for valves.  The test system is close-coupled and arranged as
           it would be in the vehicle installation.  The ram air facility
           provides realistic system simulation up to 90 mph.
         • Up to 507. improvement in fuel economy has been measured (See
           Fig. 118).
         • Emission measurements show pollution levels well below 1976 stan-
           dards (See Fig. 119).
         • The BICERI (British  Internal Combustion Engine Research Institute)
           valve has been demonstrated.
         • Idle operation (about 250 rpm) has been simulated.
         • Control testing is in progress.  This has been done on a component
           by component basis;  the complete control system is to be ready for
           test by the end of June 1974.  It is a "predictive" control; inputs
           are expander intake  valve cut-off set by accelerator positions, and
           expander rpm.  The predictive settings are:  blower motor rpm,
           air/EGR shutter position, fuel pump rpm, and feedpump displacement.
           Major feedbacks are:  organic fluid pressure for feedpump displace-
           ment, organic fluid  temperature for the corresponding air/fuel
           setting, and condenser pressure for fan speed control.

Prototype Engine Program:  Design of the Prototype Engine for the compact car
is based on information generated by the Preprototype Engine.  The performance
reference is the 1974 Ford Pinto with less than the 1977 Federal Emission
Standards.

The program status on the Prototype Engine is as follows:
         • Trade-off studies are completed.  The resulting system and
           component characteristics and features are shown in Figs. 120,
           121, 122, 123, 124,  and 125.
         • Compact car design options are developed (See Figs. 126,  127,  and
           128).
                                    -191-
                                                                                           \

-------
N)
I
  20


  18

  16
1'°
1  8
ui
u.
      4

      2


      0
    0
                10
                                                   I        I         I
                                                FEB 1974 (CORRECTED FOR
                                                        FACILITY INDUCED
                                                        PENALTIES)

                                                   FEB  1974 (AS MEASURED)
                                                       DEC 1973 GOAL
                                                             JAN 1974
                                       I
20
30      40      50
  ROAD LOAD(MPH)
                                                             —JULY 1973
60
70
60
                Fig. 118   Preprototype System Fuel Economy - FL-85 Baseline

-------
       EMISSIONS FOR FEDERAL DRIVING CYCLE
POLLUTANT
UHC
CO
NOX
1976
FEDERAL
STANDARD
{GMS/MILE]
0.41
3.40
0.40
EMISSIONS
[GMS/MILE]
0.17
0.21
0.275
1. BASED ON STEADY STATE TEST DATA.
2. INCLUDES 30 SECONDS FIRING AT 53 LBS/HR FOR START-UP SIMULATION.
3.  FUEL CONSUMPTION 10.2 MPG FOR FEDERAL  DRIVING CYCLE.
          Fig. 119  Emissions for Federal Driving Cycle
                          -193-

-------
WEIGHT CLASS


WORKING FLUID

MINIMUM PUMPING TEMPERATURE

FREEZING POINT

PEAK TEMPERATURE

PEAK PRESSURE

EXPANDER SHAFT POWER

EXPANDER SPEED

MAXIMUM FIRING RATE

MAXIMUM FLOW RATE
2500-3000 LBS
(TEST WEIGHT)

FL-50

-23°F

-82°F

650T

800 PSIA

60 HP

2000 RPM

1.05 x 106 Btu/Hr

2370 LBS/HR
         Fig.  120   System Characteristics
                      -194-

-------
        MAXIMUM FIRING RATE

        EFFICIENCY

        OUTLET TEMPERATURE

        OUTLET PHFSSURE

        MAXIMUM FUEL FLOW RATE

        MAXIMUM Alf; FLOW RATE
1.06 x 106 Btu/hr

80%

650 °F

800 psia

52.7 Ibs/l-.r

988.3 Ibs/hr
        COMBUSTION GAS SIDE PRESSURE
             PRESSURE DROP          9 inches w.c.
        WORKING FLUID SIDE
        PRESSURE DROP

        BLOWER SHAFT POWER
120 psi

0.5
        FEATURES

        •  RADIAL COMBUSTOR/VAPOR GENERATOR

        •  INTEGRATED BLOWER/ROTARY ATOMIZER

        •  THREE-PASS CRO
-------
      CONDENSER

         HEAT TRANSFER RATE
         EFFECTIVENESS
         CONDENSING TEMPERATURE
         CONDENSING PRESSURE
         AMBIENT TEMPERATURE
         AIR FLOW RATE
         CORE PRESSURE DROP

      REGENERATOR

         HEAT TRANSFER RATE
         EFFECTIVENESS

      FEATURES
669,000 Btu/hr
0.80
212°F
31.8 psia
85° F
27.400 Ibm/hr
3 inches w.c.
94.300 Btu/hr
0.70
         INTEGRATED CONDENSER-REGENERATOR
         REGENERATOR' TWO PASS  CROSS COUNTER FLOW
         CONDENSER: CROSS FLOW
         BRAZED ALUMINUM CONSTRUCTION
         AIR-COOLED
         ENGINE MOUNTED
Fig.  122   Design Point Characteristics of Condenser-Regenerator
                           -196-

-------
        TOTAL FLOW

        INLET TEMPERATURE

        SPEED

        PRESSURE RISE (TOTAL)

        PRESSURE RISE (STATIC)

        FAN SHAFT POWER


        FEATURES
           TUBE AXIAL
           CAST ALUMINUM CONSTRUCTION
           ELECTRIC MOTOR DRIVEN
           FRONT MOUNTED
27.400 Ibm/hr

85"F

2460 rpm

2.0  inches w.c.

1.2  inches w.c.

2.9  hp
Fig. 123   Design Point Characteristics of Condenser Fan
                          -197-

-------
« -CYLINDERS - 2
o BORE - 3.25 INCHES
« STROKE - 3.00 INCHES
• RATED SPEED - 2000  RPM
• INLET VALVING - HYDRAULICALLY ACTUATED
« UNIFLOW EXHAUST PORTING
• FEATURES -  VARIABLE CUT-OFF VALVSNG
              ALUMINUM BLOCK WITH IRON
              LINERS
         Fig. 124 Expander Design Characteristics
                  -198-

-------
FLOW RATE                   4.6 GPM at 1000 rpm

NUMBER OF CYLINDERS         Sin-line

BORE                       1.2 inches

STROKE                      0.4 inch (maximum)


FEATURES

  •   VARIABLE DISPLACEMENT

  •   INTEGRATED INTO EXPANDER BLOCK

  •   PUMP DISPLACEMENT AND EXPANDER CUT-OFF CONTROL
     MECHANICALLY INTEGRATED
        Fig. 125   Feedpump Design Characteristics
                        -199-

-------
                                                                              VAPOP OCN6-RATOH,
                                                   EXPANDER
                                                                                                          CONDENSER
                                         FFEDPUMP
I
K3
O
O
                                                                                               CONDENSER
                                      TRANSMISSION
                                                                            BOOST PUMP
                                      Fig.  126   Organic Rankine Engine (Pinto - Side View)

-------
S3
o
                                                                                                              TIMW3WS3ION
                                                                                                        ,   VAPOR QENCftATOM
                                                                                                          COW«N3ER FAN
                                     Fig.  127   Organic Rankine Engine (Pinto - Top View)

-------
             VAL.VINO PUMP
       FEEDPUMP
I
NJ
O
N)
                                                                       VAPOR GENERATOR
                                                                          /
                                  BOOST PUMP
                                                                                               REGENERATOR
                                                                                                   CONDENSER
                                  Fig.  128   Organic  Rankine Engine  (Pinto -  Front View)

-------
         * Major component layouts and  specifications are completed.
         • Single cylinder test  is in progress.

Calculated fuel economy characteristics  for the engine in a Pinto are shown in
Fig. 129 for diff-erent transmission options.   The calculated 0-60 mph accelera-
tion time for the Plato with a  four-speed standard transmission and the organic
Rankine engine is 19.1 seconds, whereas  for the Pinto with the same transmission
and an I.C. engine it is  16.5 seconds.

Improvements of the Prototype Engine  relative to the Preprototype system are
sumnarized in Fig. 130.

Questions and Coacaents
Question (S. S- Miner, Miner Machine  Development Co.):  How is the cut-off
    regulation obtained  hydraulically on the BICERI valve?
Answer-  The hydraulic distributor has a helix cut in a cylinder which is
    positioned axially by the  control.   This varies the time that the valve
    is exposed to hydraulic  pressure thus providing a variable cut-off.

Question (H. Moore, Jet Propulsion Laboratory):  How does t^e fuel economy
    of the organic system compare with tbat of the steam system?
Answer:  Thermal efficiencies and fuel economy values are comparable (about
    15-17% thermal efficiency);  howew/r, t^e organic system is operating at
    a lower peafc temperature (600°F versus 1000 F) and pressure (800 Psia
    versus 1000 Psial.

Question (Dr. J. E. Davoud, D-Cycle  Power):  Referring to the calculated  fuel
    economy curses in Fig.  129,  it  appears that 30 mpg at 30 mph exceeds ideal
    efficiency capability of the organic fluid cycle.  How is this explained?
Answer:  This is a practical  efficiency and does not exceed the Ideal.  Details
    of this figure will  be discussed separately if desired.
                                     -203-

-------
o
                4 SPEED MANUAL
                3 SPEED AUTOMATIC
                NO TRANSMISSION
                        Fig. 129  Pinto - 60 HP - Calculated Fuel Economy

-------
 1.  IMPROVED SFC WITH FLUORINOL-50.

 2.  REDUCED COMPONENT SIZE DUE TO REDUCED FLOW RATE.

 3.  REDUCED SYSTEM WEIGHT, ALUMINUM EXPANDER AND
    REGENERATOR.

 4.  REDUCED NUMBER OF PARTS, TWO-CYLINDER EXPANDER,
    THREE-CYLINDER PUMP, ONE FAN.

 5.  ONE SHAFT SEAL.

 6.  IMPROVED INTAKE VALVE  DESIGN.

 7.  INTEGRATED EXPANDER, FEEDPUMP. INTAKE VALVE, AND
    HYDRAULIC PUMP.

 8.  INTEGRATED CUT-OFF AND FEEDPUMP CONTROLS.

 9.  REDUCED PARASITICS.

10.  INTEGRATED REGENERATOR AND CONDENSER.

11.  ELECTRICALLY DRIVEN CONDENSER FAN WITH ENERGY STORAGE
    FOR TRANSIENT.

12.  ELIMINATED  RELATIVE  MOTION  BETWEEN COMPONENTS, NO
    FLEX LINES.

13.  IMPROVED PACKAGING AND FLEXIBLE CONFIGURATION.
 Fig. 130   Improvements Relative to Preprototype  System


                        -205-

-------
Question  (Lawrence Linden, MIT):   The ambient design point temperature of 85°F
    was  used for the condenser  on both the S.E.S.  and the Thermo Electron
    systems.  What happens  to performance at higher temperature?  Is there a
    practical maximum?
Answer:   Performance suffers  at  higher ambient temperatures,  probably not much
    at 95 F, but at about  115 F the vehicle couldn't operate.  On the other
    hand, performance  improves  at temperatures lower than 85°F.

Question  (y. Friedman,  SES):   Have you noticed any increase in condenser
    pressure or fan horsepower  with extended running due to degradation of
    working fluid?  How poisonous are decomposition products of the fluid?
    What is the solubility of oil in Fluorinal-85 and 50?
Answer-   The working fluid  has undergone over 2000 hours of continuous testing
     in  the dynamic loop; several 3KW systems have been delivered to the Army,
    and  these are operating. No problems with gradual degradation of the
     fluid at normal operating temperatures have been encountered.  If exposed
     to  temperatures above  established stability limits it will decompose, but
     time of exposure  is a  factor.  The fluid is classified as non-toxic.  Oil
     is  insoluble  in  the working fluid.

Quest ion (R. Niggemann,  Sundstrand Aviation):  What physically happens to the
     system  if you operate  above the stability limits of the working fluid?
     Why was the piston expander selected over the turbine expander?
Answer:   Although  it  is possible to operate for limited time above the stability
     limits of  the working  fluid, the performance degrades.  Sludge, acids and
     non-condensible gases  are formed.  Although the peak turbine efficiency
     is  high over a narrow speed range, the vehicle application requires opera-
     tion over a wide  range of speed and load.  The piston expander has much
     better over-all efficiency  under these load and operating conditions.

Question  (T. Duffy, Solar):   What is the means for closing the loop on the
     feedback combustor control?
Answer:   The key measurement is  the tube wall temperature on the superheater.
    This is monitored  to evoid  ov rheating and degradation of the working
    fluid.
                                     -206-

-------
Question  (E. Heffner, GM Technical  Center):   Does EPA intend to test the
     steam and organic  Rankine  systems  in the standard 4500 pound car?
Answer (Stevs Luchter,  EPA):  The decision was made to use the steam engine for
     the  prototype and  to  continue  with the organic engine as a back-up system.
     Simultaneously  it  was decided  to demonstrate the prototype steam system
     in i compact car.  No fully drivable, 4500 pound car is planned.   At
     present there is no plan to put  the organic system in a compact car;
     however, the right is reserved by  the Government to do this at a later
     date if the situation warrants it.

Question  (Arthur Underwood,  Consultant):  What is EPA doing to alleviate the
     unnecessarily low  NOx (0.4 grams/mile) requirement?  It is understood
     some recommendations  have  been made.
Answer (Steve Luchter,  EPA):  Some  internal work has been going on at Durham
     regarding the health  effects of  various NOx levels.  Information about
     possible conclusions  and/or recommendations has not been received.
     Appropriate contacts  will  be  identified, so that inquiries can be made.

Question  (J. Abbin,  Sandia laboratories):  What expander and feedpump effi-
     ciencies have been demonstrated  and what efficiencies are anticipated for
     the  Prototype Engine?
Answer:   Feedpump efficiencies  vary between 70-85%.  Expander efficiencies.
     vary between 50 and 707*.   At  road  load the expander efficiency is about
     60%.  These are measured values.

Question  (L. Linder, MIT):   Are there manufacturing problems associated with
     the  Rankine engines analogous  to those encountered by gas turbines with
     heat exchangers and turbine wheels?
Answer:   One of the  major  advantages  of the Rankine engine is its producibility.
     Operating temperatures  and pressures are moderate; materials of construc-
     tion are not unusual  or scarce;  methods of manufacturing and processing
     are  used for or adaptable  to autoajotive and Diesel engine practice.  Thou-
     sands of hours  of  compatibility  tests have been run on the lubricants,
     working fluids, and materials  of construction.  All of the materials
     currently involved are  compatible  and commonly available.
                                     -207-

-------
Question  (Dr. Davoud, D-Cycle  Power):   On a previous program we had to pay
     $85  per gallon of  Fluorinol-85.   What are the prospects for reducing that
     price?
Answer:   In production  quantities projected prices for Fluorinol-85 range from
     85 cents to  $1.25  per  pound.

D.   California Clean Car Program, by M.  Wenstrom, California Research, and
     R. Renner  Consultgnt  (Guest Presentation)
The California Clean Car Project is being funded primarily by the State
Assembly  with the two prime contractors supplying supplementary funding.  Two
steam powered automobiles have been built, one by the Aerojet Liquid Rocket
Company of Sacramento,  and  the other by Steam Power Systems, Inc. of San Diego.

Accomplishments  to date are-
          • Contract  work began on development of two steam cars, November 15,
            1972.
          • Most major system components were fabricated and tested by November
            15,  1973.
          • Bench testing of complete systems was underway by February 1974.
          • First operation of a  test chassis on steam power (SPS) was on
            March 16,  1974.
          • Both automobiles were completed and operational by May 1, 1974.
          • Vehicles  were ready for first public display and demonstration
            on  May 15,  1974.

 It is planned  to make system improvements until July 15, 1974, and then to
 subject the vehicles  to testing and evaluation by state agencies.  A final
 report will be  issued by the Assembly Office of Research in the  fall of 1974.

 It was recognized that in a project involving limitations in time and  resources,
equal attention could not be given to all aspects of development.  Therefore,
a conservative  approach was needed.  For  vample, given the choice between
achieving low exhaust emissions or good fuel economy, it was decided to con-
centrate  on the  former, while leaving the latter  for future work.
                                     -208-

-------
Aerojet's powerplant features a single-stage impulse steam  turbine, driving
through a hydrostatic transmission.  The complete powerplant  is  located in the
normal engine compartment and transmission tunnel.  A steam generator built by
Scientific  Energy Systems and based on a design developed for the Environmental
Protection  Agency Is used.  Low emission characteristics have already been
validated by test.

SPS has built a  four-cylinder, double-acting compound-expansion  steam engine.
Power is delivered through a two-speed automatic mechanical transmission.  The
steam generator  and condenser *re  located in the front of the car, with the
engine,  transaxle, and auxiliaries in the rear.  The SPS car  is  also deriving
benefit  from EPA-fJunded combustion and steam generator research.  Their steam
generator has been supplied by the Solar Division of International Harvester Co.

Figures  131 and  LJ2 show the two automobiles.  The Aerojet  car is a converted
1973 Chevrolet Veg^ coupe, while the body and chassis of the  SPS car are of
special  construction and tailored  to the powerplant configuration.

Figure 133  summarises the characteristics of the vehicles and their propulsion
systems.  Figure 134 gives some of the test results to date,  together with the
expectations for this summer's testing.  Figure 135 gives emissions standards
and expected projected results.

Some of  the develojwnent problems encountered include:  fuel economy, system
weight,  noise, oxides of nitrogen, and controls.

During the  last  half of this summer, the cars will be evaluated  with the
assistance  of sta&e agencies.  The technical evaluation will  ascertain whether
the state's goals have been met.   It will also serve to provide  ciuch test, data
that have been lacking in regard to modern oteam cars.  Such data can provide a
base of  departure for future research and development.

Questions and Comaaents
Question  (Dr. G.  A. Brown, University of Rhode Island):  How  is  ic tbe term
     "adequate"  is usjd for the performance of the steam bu«  when the
                                     -209-

-------
I
NJ
                                               vW* "'"'•'
                           ''^\ • \,-':  . y- J_"T'•



                 FEED PUMP',,,.  ;.
                                                                                    TRANSMISSION
                                                                          REGENERATOR;
                                                               TURBINE
                                Fig.  131   Artist's Rendering of Aerojet Steam-Powered Vega

-------
Fig. 132   Steam Power Systems Car Prior to Engine  Installation



                           -211-

-------
Vehicle
   AerojfaL
SPS
Type
Vehicle construction
Approx. curb weight, Ib  (wet)
Max. rated Payload, Ib.
Gross Weight, fully loaded,  Ib.
 Chevrolet Vega   Special Construction
 Unit body     Chassis w/separate body
 2,905    ,        3,030
   705              750
 3,655            3,780
Power System
Steam Generator Type
Burner Type
Rated max. Steam Flow,  Ib/hr
Rated max. fuel flow, Ib/hr
Expander Type

No. of expansion stages

Expander rated gross hp
Expander rated rpm, max.
Expander inlet pressure^  psia
Steam temperature, F
Condenser frontal area, ft
Condenser thickness, in.
Powerplant dry weight,  Ib*
 Monotube
 Air Atomizing
   660
    50
 Impulse turbine
60,000
   500
 1,000
     4.1
     4.5
   970
Monotube
Spinning Cup
  650
   48
    4-cyl. recip.
   (double acting)
    2

   65
2,400
1,000
  800
    6.1
    3.6
  940
   Powerplant dry weight  includes transmission but not differential,
   and excludes batteries,  fuel tank,  and driver's controls.
              Fig.  133  Vehicle and Powerplant Characteristics


                                -212-

-------
                                         Aerojet       SPS

 Tested  Performance as  of May 3, 1974
  (mostly inferred from  system
 bench tqsts)

 Power System Max. net  bhp (a)            48             45
 Specific fuel cons., Ib/bhp-hr  ^a)       0.95          1.03
 Idle Fuel cons., Ib/hr                  11.7           6.2
 Cold starting time:
 -   First movement of car, sec.        155            130
 -   To full power, sec.                315            270
 Est. best fuel mileage,  mpg     ...      12             12
 Max. Road Horsepower Developed  l  '                    36
  Expected Performance - July 15, 1974

  Emissions, CO, g/mi (c)                  0.5           1.2
  Emissions, HC  g/mi (c)                  0.1           0.14
  Emissions, NOX g/mi (c) , ,              0.17          0.22
  Urban fuel mileage, mpg (c)           8-10          9-11
  Best fuel mileage,  mpg                  16            17
  Max. speed, 0% grade, mph               75            84
  Max. speed, 5% grade, mph               50            57
  Sound levels, exterior @ 50'
               SAE J968A, dBA             74            74
  Sound levels, interior, dBA             72            72
Fig.  134   Powerplant and Vehicle:  Test Data and Performance Expectations

             (a)  Best performance, based on net power into
                  transmission after all powerplant auxiliaries
                  are driven.

             (b)  Aerojet,  by chassis dynomometer; SPS, by acceleration
                  trails.  Installed systems had not yet been  tuned to
                  optimum levels.

             (c)  Over Federal Driving Cycle.


                           -213-

-------
                     EMISSIONS   LEVELS
                       (Grans/mile)
1974 Standards
CO
39.0
HC
3.2
NOX
2.0
   Original 1976
   Federal Standards         3.4          0.41           0.4

   California Clean Car
   Project Goals              1.7          0.2            0.2

   Range  of expected
   values, California
   Clean  Car Project      0.2-0.8       0.05-0.1      0.14-0.2
Fig.  135   Comparison Emission Standards  and Projected Kesults

          *The original standards of 0.41 g/mi HC,  3.4 g/mi CO and
           0.4 g/mi NO  have now been postponed - perhaps until  the
           1980's.  Project goal for emissions is to demonstrate no
           more than one-half of the original 1976  Federal standards.
                             -214-

-------
    performance, according to the numbers,  Is  only  one-third  to one-seventh
    that of a comparable Diesel bus?  Why  is effort being  devoted  to a  closed
    cycle, turbine drive when it is generally  known and  accepted that the
    part load fuel economy is inherently very  low?
Answer:  Reports on the California steam Bus Program present quantitative data
    in comparison with Diesel engine data;  the lower fuel  economy  was not
    hidden; however, the buses did operate well enough  to  go  from  stop  to
    stop, picking up and dropping off passengers in regular revenue  service.
    These buses operated over regular routes including  the hills in  San
    Francisco.

    Concerning the turbine efficiency, it  is important  to  compare  the drive
    system including the turbine gear box  and  transmission.   The Aerojet
    combination acts to keep the turbine running over its  optimum, high
    efficiency speed range.  On this basis it  compares  favorably with other
    systems.

Question (Joseph Abbin, Sandia I^bs):  What fuel economies  are projected for
    the California Steam Cars?
Answer:  Concerning the SPS system, avenues of  approach  for improved  fuel
    economy are:
         • Reduction of heat transfer and  steam leakage  losses
         • Improved valve timing
         • Reduced water rates at light loads
         • Reduced parasitic power losses;  possibly exhaust steam  driven
           condenser and boiler fans.

    Aerojet expects to get about 14 mpg with a high speed  transmission.
    There is an advanced compound type cycle which  could possibly  yield up to
    20 mpg; however, it is beyond the scope of the  present contract.

Question (E. Doyle, Thermo Electron):  Why  are  the start-up times to  first
    movement as long as they are?
                                     -215-

-------
                        \
Answer;  These are not due  to boiler limitations (Boiler is less than 30
     seconds), but to other current  system limitations.   Since the cars have
     literally been  running only  a  few days,  the starts  have purposely been
     conservative until more is  learned about these systems in these vehicles.
     It  is expected  that  these times will  be  substantially reduced as testing
     proceeds.

Question (Dr. Davoud, D-Cycle  Power): "What is the valve system in reciprocating
     expander?
Answer:   Double acting piston  valves are used with variable cut-off provided
     by  a swing eccentric mechanism which changes the phase angle and stroke
     length  of the valve  simultaneously.

E.   Advanced Boiler Studies,  by Dr. Frank Paul, Carnegie Mellon University
The Mechanical Engineering  Department of Carnegie Mellon University received
a grant  from EPA  for research addressed to an improved vapor generator design
for Rankine  cycle automobile engines.  Work was initiated in May 1973.

To date, this work has  included  a survey of commercial contractors, EPA
contractors, and  other  manufacturers of vapor generators; an evaluation of new
and existing heat  transfer technology; and preliminary synthesis of a new
design configuration based on transient response and compactness.

General  constraints  imposed for the  survey were:  volume less than 40 cubic
feet and a  firing  rate  of 3 million  BTU per hour.  From the 56 inquiries and
36 responses to  the  survey, the  following commercial vapor generator manufac-
turers were  able  to  come at least close to the  imposed constraints, althjugn
all were low pressure,  relatively large designs:
         •  Single or multiple monotube (oil or gas fired)
                — Clayton Manufacturing
                — Vapor Corporation
                - Kanzler Steam Transport, Div. of Autocoast
                                     -216-

-------
         • Pot type with fire tubes (oil or gas fired)
                — Eclipse Lookout
                — James Leffel
         • Pot type with electric heating
                — Chromalox Division of Emerson
                - P. M. Lattner

The  industrial developers for small Rankine Cycle engines  include:
         • EPA contractors (All single and multiple monotube)
                — Aerojet Liquid Rocket
                — Lear Motors
                — Scientific Energy Systems
                — Thermo Electron
                - Solar
         • Other Manufacturers
                ~ DuPont (Doerner rotational)
                — Inter Continental (Huttner rotational)
                — Saab-Scandta (Multiple tube capillary)

Conclusions from the survey were:
         • No commercial manufacturers of vapor generators were  identified as
           applicable to automotive Rankine Cycle engines.
         • Recent technology development has concentrated on single or multiple
           monotube designs for compactness.  Monotube designs are limited by
           slow process time constants on the order of 10 to 20  seconds.

As a result of the survey and analytical consideration of  the fundamental
factors and phenomenon controlling the response and size of the basic heat
transfer equipment, a new conceptual design was synthesized.  Genetically,
the  design is a rotational preheatei/boiler plus a monotube superheater as
shown schematically in Fig. 136.  This approach provides a "sharp" liquid-
vapor interface,  with "flash" boiling.  It also provides a lumped rather
than distributed configuration which reduces resident time theoretically
improving response.  Anticipated problem areas include:
                                    -217-

-------
                         •fb
                                                  •FINNED SURFACES
       ////.
f "Hr

f

                     n
              /
        T^v-NyXir

        TKAXI
       7//S
                              \  \
                  »  » o
                   tf  c  d   Ob
               s-A  \
                     \    v
         /-,	s
         "^Q*'*~Q *^5
             i  9  »
                     mTLllJ U U U U

                                                             SUPERHEATER
                         PREHEAYER/iOILER
                          Fig. 136  Vapor Generator Schematic

-------
         • Internal heat transfer in the preheater/boiler
                Critical heat flux is important.  Boiling heat transfer in
                high acceleration and pressure fields permit the preheater
                (economizer) and boiler to be designed as a single rotational
                unit.  Boiling heat transfer is improved in centrifugal force
                fields.  Effects of pressure are not well established when
                combined with centrifugal force fields.
         • Preheater'boiler shell stresses
                Strength and materials selection pose design constraints.
                (The monotube superheater is not considered a problem.)
                Practical geometric limits are:  maximum diameter - 12 inches;
                maximum wall thickness - 0.125 inches.
         • External combustion gas heat transfer
         • Transient behavior

The calculated dynamic response of a rotational preheater/boiler plus mono-
tube superheater, designed to match SES mass flow and heat flux rates at
full power is shown in Fig. 137.  Key dimensions of such a system are:
         • Preheater/Boiler:
                — Diameter = 12 inches
                — Wall Thickness = 0.125 inches
                — Length = 32.4 inches
                — Finned Surface (Double Effective Surface Area)
         • Superheater:
                — External Tube Diameter =0.5  inches
                - Internal Tube Diameter = 0.37 inches
                - Length = 26 feet
                — Finned Surface (Double Effective Surface Area)

The transient response of the present monotube  is about 20 seconds as compared
to about 2 seconds (calculated) for the rotational plus monotube superheater.
                                    -219-

-------
3250
3000.
               FLAME TEMPERATURE,  Tf
 7400-
 1325 :
 1200
 UOO
      Lbmlhr.
                                                         Sec.
              INLET BOILER FLOW,  mt|
      03  0.6  09  12  75  13  2)  26  27  3.0 33 3.6  3.9  42 Sec.
    Lbm/hr.
 1300-
        -OUTLET  BOILER  FLOW,  m
 7200
 7750
 7700 t^s/
7000
S50
7070

7000
                       SUPERHEATER FLOW, mt
                                                        Sec.
                  SUPERHEATER PRESSURE,  Ps
       03  0.6  0.9  1.2  1.5  1.8  2J  24  27  3.0  33  36 39  42 Sec.
             SUPERHEATER  TEMPERATURE, T,
       Fig. 137   Vapor Generator Response  (Full Power Condition)

                            -220-

-------
 Compactness In terms of preliminary weight and volume  estimates compare  as
 follows:
     Monotube:                               3.2 Cu.  ft.;  125  Ib.  (e«t.)
     Rotational plus monotube superheater:   5.3 cu.  ft.  'est.); 100  Ib.  (est.)

"The next proposed steps are:
          • Construction and laboratory evaluation of  a  scaled bench test
            design under
                 — Steady-state conditions
                 — Dynamic conditions
          • Analysis of the design for
                 — Heat transfer
                 — Strength and geometry
                 — Dynaaic response

 Questions and Comments
 Question  (C. Amann, GM Technical  Center):   The  prime problem is  the  high
     pressure rotating seal.  How do  you  plan to  approach this  problem?
 Answer:   The high pressure  (1000  Psi),  high temperature (600 F)  is recognized
     as a major problem.  Some  information on this  will be obtained  during
     the  bench tests.  Some  information may also  be available from the work
     of Dornier and Huettner on their lower pressure seals.

 Question  (Y.  Friedman, SES):  Where  is  the economizer in the design?  If no
     economizer  is used,  very fast response can be  achieved,  but  efficiency
     is sacrificed.   Is  this factor  taken into account?
 Answer:   Sub-cooled water (about  220°F) is taken  into the boiler  and,  in
     essence, the preheater  and boiler  are integrated.  It is planned  to mix
     the  feed wat-r with  the boiling  water in a way which will  not inhibit the
     boiling process.  Efficiency characteristics have not yet been considered
     In detail.

 Question  (Dr.  Davoud,  D-Cycle  Power):  How much water will be in  the  boiler?
 Answer:   About 2 pounds  of water are maintained  in  the  boiler during  the
      transients.
                                      -221-

-------
V.    DIESEL ENGINES. ALTERNATIVE FUELS.  ELECTRIC VEHICLES.  AND NEW EPA FUEL
     ECONOMY TEST CYCLE
A.    Diesel Engine  Study,  Rtcardo,  Ltd.,  England (Presented by .T. -J.  McFadden,
     EPA)                             ,
The scope  of  the  program encompasses four main tasks:   (I) Comprehensive
Literature Search,  (2)  Problem Area Trade-Off Methodology, (3) Engine Con-
figuration Study, and (4) Recommendations for Further Research.  Tasks I and
2 are complete; Tasks 3 and 4 are in progress and will be completed in about
one month.

The performance aspects used and a comparison of the weighting factors deter-
mined by a committee and by 18 experienced members of the Ricardo staff are
shown in Fig. 13S.   Some of the conclusions reached in Task 2 are as follows.
          •  Black Smoke
                 — Not an aesthetic problem if engine complies with 1974
                   federal smoke regulation.  (Attainable by attention to
                   local mixing and overall air-fuel ratio at rated conditions.)
                 — Project vehicle has such a high power tc weight ratio that
                   visible smoke conditions should only be attained for
                   extremely short periods during hard accelerations.
                 — Turbc-charged engines may have a low speed  transient problem.
                   'The Comprex is one possible approach to a solution.)
          o  Blue  Smoke
                 — Cm be unpleasant from sidewalk, particularly as it is most
                   commonly formed under idle conditions.  .This problem can  be
                   r.inimized by careful attention to combustion chamber design
                   and fuel injection equipment characteristics.
          • Odor
                 — Small high speed Diesel can have an odor problem,  particu-
                   larly at light  load conditions if misfire  conditions are
                   approached.   It can be minimized by addition of  light  load
                   advance.
                                      -222-

-------
 1 .
 2.
 3.
V
 5.
 6.
 7.
 8.
 9.
 10.
 II.
.52.
 13.
 li.
 IS-
 W.
 17.
 18.
 19.
 20.
 2T.
 22.
 23.
 2li.
 25.
 26.
               SMOKE
        PARTICIPATES
               ODOUR
                   HC
                   CO
                  S02
        HC  REACTIVITY
EVAPORATIVE EMISSIONS
      MISC. EMISSIONS
     NOiSC  (DRIVE BY)
       PACKAGE VOLUME
       PACKAGE WEIGHT
         FUEL ECONOMY
            FUEL COST
   VEHICLE FIRST COST
     MAINTENANCE COST
         START ABILITY
     HOT OR5VEA3ILITY
    COLO DRIVEAolLITY
           TORQU.E RISE
           DURABILITY
             HEAT LOSS
             FIRE -RISK.
          IDLING  NOISE
        TORQUE RECOIL
             Fig.  138    Light Duty Vehicle  Poverplant Survf.-y  Results
                                    -223-

-------
       — Odor at full load is minimized by combustion chamber develop-
         ment and reduction of smoke levels.
       — The identification of several odorous components has been
         achieved, but quantitative assessment has yet to be perfected.
         The Arthur D. Little Odormeter may advance technology in
         this area to a significant extent.
• Gaseous emissions
       — Turbocharging increases NOx levels by increasing charge tem-
         perature, but allows further retard for the same smoke limit.
       — Exhaust gas recirculation is effective in reducing NO* levels,
         particularly over CVS cycle where it reduces mass flow rates
         but durability has yet to be proved.  It increases smoke
         levels.
       — Water injection is also effective in reducing NOx, but has
         the benefit of not significantly altering engine performance.
         Logistics/installation/engine durability problems make this
         approach unattractive.
       — Timing retard is the most effective single parameter for
         reducing emission levels.  Smoke  limited performance of
         indirect injection (I.U.I.) engines normally deteriorates
         less rapidly with retard than from direct injection (D.I.)
         engines.
       — From limited data available, emission levels from ?-stroke
         engines should be of same order as from 4-stroke engines of
         similar performance.
       — From heavy duty experience, it is predicted that application
         of a D.I. ch?T-ber will increase NOx and CO levels; also, HC
         levels may rise rapidly at retarded timings.
       — It is predicted that a high speed (1000 rev/min) conventional
         naturally aspirated D.I. engine could not achieve primary
         target levels due to low smoke limited performance at
         retarded timings.
                           -224-

-------
         • Gaseous Emissions,  Naturally Aspirated 4-Stroke Indirect Injection
                — 3.4 G/mile CO can he achieved.
                — 0.4 G/mile HC may be attainable on prototype vehicles.   The
                  possibility  of maintaining this level in production without
                  the use  of hang-on devices is open to doubt.
                — 1.5 G/mile NOx can just be achieved from a prototype current
                  generation engine using timing retard alone.   Exhaust gas
                  recycle  may  be necessary to allow sufficient margin for
                  production compliance.
                — 0.4 G/mile NOx has been achieved with a highly modified
                  prototype engine in a European type vehicle.   This  target
                  could not be achieved with a practical American vehicle.
                — From  most conventional engines, mass emissions of all pollu-
                  tants increase over CVS-2 with engine swept volume,  NOx  to
                  a  lesser extent than HC and CO.
                — A  low powered vehicle would have less difficulty in attaining
                  the target objectives with the additional benefit of improved
                  fuel  economy.

The Engine Configuration Study  (Task 3) includes consideration of the  engine
schemes  shown  in Fig.  139.   Probably the most viable candidate for short term,
minimum  lead time consideration is the naturally aspirated,  indirect injection,
V8 concept described  in  Figs.  140 and 141.  As a retrofit concept,  existing
gasoline engine tooling  could be effectively implemented and the light duty
Diesel could be developed within a relatively short development cycle.

The Prototype  Vehicle  Specifications which the various engine schemes  are
supposed to fulfill are:
         • 3500 Ib. vehicle
         • Acceleration:   0-60 mph in 13.5 seconds
                           20-70 mph in 15 seconds
         • High speed pass maneuver to 80 mph in 15 seconds
                                     -225-

-------
V8   V6   Inline  V6  Inline   V6    Inline 6   4 Cyl.  2 Rotor
NA   TC   6 TC   TC   6 TC 2 Stroke 2 Stroke Compound 2 SMQC
IDI   1DI  IDI    DI   DI  LooplDI  T£ro     DI    Roury
Bore in.
Stroke in.
HP
Piston area
sq. in. '
Swept Volume
cu. in.
Weight
Box Volume

HP/cu. in.
Swept Volume

HP/sq. in. .
Piston Area
HP/ft3 Box
Volume
Ib/cu.in Swept
Volume
Ib/HP
3.46
3.86
128

75.3

290
700.
11.18


0.44


1.7

11.45

2.41
5.47
3.54
3.94
128

59.1

232.7
. 680
11.6


0.55


2.16

11.03

•2.92
6.1
3.54
3.94
128

59.1

232.7
_ 720
12.7


0.55


2.16

10.08

3.09
6.4
3.66
3.7
128

63.1

233.6
6*60
11.0


0.55
• 1

2.0

11.63

2.83
5.16
3.66
3.7
128

63.1

233.6
680
12.0


0.53


2tO

10.66'
^
2.91
5.31
3.89
4.48
128

71.3
*
320
760
12.7


0.4


1.8

1CU08

2.37
5.9
3.26
4.48
128
«
50.1

224.8
800
16.77


0.57


2.55

7.63

3.56
6.25
3.66
3.66
128

42.1

154.1
670
11.3


0.83


3.04

11.33

4.35
5.23
_
-
128

-

-
500
9.16
4

-


-

13.98

-
3.9
   Fig.  139    EPA Diesel  Impact Study  -
               Engines  Under Consideration
                   -226-

-------
    3.46"  (88 mm) x  3.86" (98 mm) x-V8

    292  CID (4.78 LIT)

    128  BHP @ 4000 REV/MIN (88 LB/IN2 BMEP)

    210  LB. FT. TORQUE @ 2000 REV/MIN (109 LB/IN2 BMEP)

    PISTON SPEED = 2560 FT/MIN  (13 m/s)

    HP/IN2 PISTON AREA = 1.71
Fig. 140  Engine Configuration Study - 4-Stroke  Naturally Aspirated
         Comet Vb
                           -227-

-------
     130
     120
     Ito
    too
  1
  s
  
-------
         • Primary emissions  goals:   0.41 gm/mi HC
                                      3.40 gm/mi CO
                                      1.50 gm/mi NOx
         • Secondary  Emissions Goals:   Same except 0.4 gai/mi NOx.

For comparison, a  standard  European gasoline engine rated at 130 BHP at 5000
rpm is  being used  (see Figs.  142 and 143).

Questions and Comments
Question  (Dr. J. E. Davoud,  D-Cycle Power):  Will these engines have better
     acceleration,  fuel consumption,  etc.  than the Mercedes Diesel, which is
     perhaps the most  widely marketed Diesel engine in the U.S.?
Answer;   Subjectively, the  driveability of the lower weight Diesel seems to
     be much more  acceptable and lively than the heavier engines.
Comment (Mr. Reynolds, Jet  Propulsion Laboratory):  A Diesel vehicle is being
     run  on  the West Coast.   (About 100 vehicles have been converted to
     Diesels to date.)  It  uses a Ricardo designed, 6-cylinder, indirect
     injection engine.  The turbo-charged version produces 130 hp; it weighs
     550  Ibs-  Over the EPA, Federal Driving Cycle, it gets 24.8 mpg with
     about 0.2 G'mi HC. 2.0 G/mi CO,  and 1.0 G/mi NOv.

Question  (T. Duffy,  Solar):   What is the part load BSFC of the Diesel concept,
     particularly  at about  0.1 of rated power (average FDC power requirement
     is about O.I  max  powc-r)?
Answer:   Part load data are not readily available; this will be followed up.

Question  (C. Amann, CM Technical Center):   Although infrequent smoke is men-
     tioned, is the ultimate objective to eliminate all s-noke?
Answer:   Yes
Coameot (C. Amann,  CM  Technical Center):  Add-on devices were mentioned as a
     means of achieving 0.4 gm/mi HC levels.  However, thermal and catalytic
     reactors require  elevated temperature to work.  Because the Diesel has
     very good light load  fuel economy, the exhaust temperatures are very  low;
     hence, these  add-on devices may not work.
                                     -229-

-------
                                                     \
183 CID (3 LITRE) 6 CYLINDER ENGINE

SPECinCATICr.'S TO r.EET PRIMAKY EMISSIONS TARGETS

PETROL INJECTION; OX iD IS IMG CATALYST, EGR -»• AIR  INJECTION
OR
CLOSE TOLERANCE CARBURETTORS in PLACE OF PETROL*INJECTION

ENGINE WEIGHT - 400 LB
FUEL CONSUMPTION - 15 f.PG  (U.S.) ON LA-*i
PREDICTED EMISSIONS - HC 0.1, CO 0.5, NOx.1,3

PROBLEM AREAS:
        i.   CATALYST DURABILITY 130 000 MILES)
        2.-   USE OF K03LE  METALS (BEING REDUCED)
        3.   COST OF EMISSIONS CONTROL DEVICES-(ABOUT $200
             PRODUCTfON COST)
           Fig.  1^2   130 BHP Gasoline Engine
                          -230-

-------
  130-
  120-
  100
 80
  So V
                                                            Sooo
Fig. 143  EPA Diesel  Impact Study — Estimated Performance Curve for
          Gasoline Engine
                               -231-

-------
    In comparing the Diesel engine with  the European gasoline engine In a
    3500 Ib. vehicle, it  is important  to make sure the difference in weight
    of the gasoline and Diesel engines is propefly accounted for.  The heavier
    Diesel will in curn require a heavier vehicle structure to support the
    weight.
ji.~ •'.;
Question (Robert Miller, Eaton Corporation):   What is meant by your term
    "retrofit"?
Answer:  For the short term scheme,  it  appears that a conversion or retrofit
    from gasoline to Diesel is a possibility.

Question:  If Mercedes1 4-cylinder,  240D engine were doubled to 8 cylinders,
    it would closely match the displacement and power of the 130 hp engine
    scheme suggested.  How would  it  compare in performance?  Have emissions
    data been taken on the 4-cylinder  240D?
Answer:  It is expected that the performance would be quite similar.  Emissions
    data have been taken  on the Mercedes 240D.

B.  Alternate Fuels, by J. B.  Fangborn,  Institute of Gas Technology
The objective of this study is  to assess  the technical and economic feasibility
of alternative fuels for automotive  transportation.  Because of the unsatis-
factory situation now developing in  which the U.S. is becoming increasingly
dependent on imported petroleum, the  major emphasis in the selection of an
alternative fuel is based  on its long-term availability from domestic sources.
In addition, economics, competition  with  other energy applications for limited
energy resources, safety,  handling,  environmental impacts, and system com-
patibility are being taken into account.   This study is limited to chemical
fuels, and, except for fuel cell vehicles which use & chemical fuel, electric
vehicles are excluded.

In recent years the United States has realized that its projected supply of
crude oil will not be sufficient to  meet  the expected, increased demands of  the
future.  In fact, current  projections of  crude oil supply and prtroleum fuel
utilization show that, beginning in  the period 1975-1980, the domestic
                                    -232-

-------
petroleum supply may not  satisfy the U.S. transportation energy demand.
Since ground transportation,  chiefly automobiles, consumes a majority of  the
transportation energy, automobiles probably will have to find another energy
source and possibly even  a  new fuel before the turn of the century.

The initial consideration list of domestic energy sources, four abundant
auxiliary material sources, and potential alternative fuels that could be
synthesized from these energy and material sources are given below.  The  con-
ventional crude oil and natural gas resource base is excluded.  Also excluded
is any  fuel that would produce significant amounts of combustion products
which are not normally found in air.

                            Auxiliary Material        Pocential Automotive
Energy  Sources               	Sources	        	Fuels	
Coal                        Air (0  , C02> NZ)         Acetylene
Shale oil                    Rock (limestone)          Ammonia
Tar sands                    Water                     Carbon monoxide
Uranium and  thorium          Land                      Coal
Nuclear fusion                                         Distillate oils
Solar radiation                                        Ethanol
Solid wastes  (garbage)                                 Gasoline  (C$  - CIQ)
Animal wastes                                          Heavy oils
Wind power                                             Hydrazine
Tidal power                                            Hydrogen
Hydropower                                             LPG  (synthetic)
Geothenaal heat                                        Methanol
                                                      Methyl amines
                                                      Natural gas  (C.  -  C_)
                                                      Napthas
                                                      Vegetable  oils

The criteria  used  for fuel selection are based on the following  factors:
         • Adequacy  of  energy and  material availability and competing
           demands  for  fuel
         •  Safety (toxicity) and handling properties of  fuels
                                     -233-

-------
         • Relative compatibility with transport and utilization facilities
         • Severity of environmental impacts and resource depletion
         • Fuel system economics

Figure 144 shows schematically the fuel selection procedure and required
infcreation inputs.

To assemble, evaluate, and compare the pertinent fuel information, numerical
values were assigned to the merits of the various fuels and were used to con-
struct Fig. 145.  This is a tabulation of the relative merits of the alterna-
tive  fuels, and when quantitative data allow, the values have been normalized
to that of standard gasoline  (the reference base).   This is an  illustrative
and overall time frame table.  The study program actually deals with three
separate  treatments, one for  each of  the time frames, 1975-85,  1985-2000, and
beyond the year 2COO.  The rating system for fuel selection is  outlined below:
         • Synthesis Technology:
                1 = Probable; commercial process,  or demonstration plants
                    coule be built
                2 = Possible; developmental, needs pilot plants
                3 « Speculative; conceptual or  laboratory methods
                5 " Moderate technology gap
         • Fuel Availability:
                1 - Probable; energy supply available and fuel not required
                    elsewhere
                2 = Possible; energy potentially available and fuel not
                    required elsewhere, but is desired as a chemical commodity
                3 = Speculative; energy supply doubtful and/or fuel i.i
                    desired  elsewhere
                5 = Eliminated; energy supply not  adequate and/or  the tuel  is
                    required for a deficit elsewhere
         • Safety and Handling:
                                 ppm  gasoline
           -Transportability (bulk):
     "          .     ,   ppm  fuel    »-l
- Toxicity ratio =  (   ''    oline  '
                                     -234-

-------
 I
K)
VI
 I
                                              ECONOMIC MOEL
                                              ENERGY MiuM>-}UPn.r
                        IOENTIFT
                        TECHNOLOGY IMFOOIUTIOM

                        CAPS
                                                                                                                              JELECTEO FUELS
                                                    Fig.  144   Alternative Fuel Evaluation Chart

-------












1
K)
UJ
1



S'nir-rilt
*
Ml,
CO 1
Coil Issn .'
DUUlUttt
IDll^Kl Ovlfl '



SVK '.j.ol.-ir 1
S,H. :
II, (liquid) !
M.IK3 (proptlw) S
CH,OII 1
CII Ml, i
S-JG 1
v^rt.bi. o;i >

»' - » 0
1 _, K
; . : H
:
.
.
< S 1 0 i

1 -• 1 I
,' -~ .' 1
; . . •o"
i o
til a
i : i !.<•
i : -• ^o
^ >! 1 0
•, ! 0

1 .'12 \ ) *
/ 4 1 .' > 1
t 4i ; * >
: .• i t i '•


1 .' * ! 2 .'

12 III
1 III
lit, \ 1 *
!«,• : > :
124 2 ) .'
1 >.» I 2 2
1 J.» J » »
1 1. 1 2 )
1 2.1 2 2 t

1 ; , t. i
2 2 2 >: "
1 2 1 * -1 «
.' 1 5 ' K .
' 2 3 » J" •

2 ; 4 ii 4

-' 2 | 1 >
•' 2 i : ; > .-
2 .' •• »4. •
: 2 J.2 ;• 4
1 l.« » t
2 2 *l |.IJ!4
> 2 > f) 4
2 2 1.4 1C. <,
2 2 10 40 1
TIM
i:
4
;:
•


•

1

: 4
4
*
)
l>
*
i:
Fig. 145   Fuel Selection by Ranking Relative  to  Gasoline

-------
       1 = Excellent;  liquid or gas transport, can be piped (like
           gasoline or natural gas) and can be carried (pure) in
           simple tanks
       2 = Good; solids transport, or can be piped after specie./.
           precautions or preparations
       3 = Poor; cannot be piped or carried conveniently, must be
           added to a carrying agent fur handling and safety
  — •>•»      -     fuel tankage weight   .    .,   fuel tankage volume
    *~          gasoline tankage weight       gasoline tankage volume
• Compatibility:
  — Transmission and distribution:
       I = Probably compatible; can use the present system
       2 = Possibly compatible; has its own system or can use the
           present system with modifications, some new equipment is
           needed
       3 = Compatibility is speculative; essentially all new equip-
           ment  is needed for a workable system
       5 = Eliminated; not only incompatible, but new, sophisticated
           equipment  is needed that is beyond practicality
  — Engine Compatibility
       1 = Probably compatible
       2 - Possibly compatible
       3 = Compatibility is speci-.iative
       5 = Eliminated, presumed incompatible
• Environmental  Effects:
       Only solvent-refined coal  (.5RC) will  produce emissions of the
       type that are  beyond the capability of automotive emission
       controls  that  are now  under development.   Overall system
       effects  are  indeterminate  at  this  time.  All fuels are given
       a "2", except  coal which is giver, a "5".
• Costs:
       Utilization costs,  $/mile,  are  not  included.   The costs are
       for the  fuels  at  the service station.  The reference gasoline
       cost (extax) is  $2.60  (1973).
                            -237-

-------
                       Cost „ est fuel cost
                              gasoline cost

Conclusions:   According to the rankings and final rating of Fig. 145, the most
oromising alternative fuels are synthetic gasoline and hydrocarbon distillates.
Methanol is the next most attractive liquid fuel.  Thus, further, more detailed
comparisons between methanol and synthetic gasolines are justified.  Hydrogen
'is'a speculative fuel, which will become more attractive as fossil carbon
resources are depleted.

The final phase of this study is now in the process of completion.   It involves
the development of recommendations and scenarios for the introduction of the
most promising alternative fuels in each of the three time periods.

Questions and Comments
Question (C.  0. Thomas, Institute for Energy Analysis):  In the presentation,
     assured coal resources were given as 1.6 trillion tons.  This figure has
     been unchanged in the literature since 1942; it may be misleading.  More
     recently, a distinction has been made between "resource base" and "recover-
     able reserves" by current technology and economics.  Numbers as low as
     200 million tons  (lower by a factor of 8) are currently being used for
     recoverable reserves.  (Ret:  McElvyi Science, 1972, and Paul Averett,
     USCS Professional Paper No. 82.)  The reason for bringing this  u? is that
     the oil and chemical  industry in the past have been far more rigorous in
     treating proven reserves and recoverable reserves than the coal industry.
     If comparisons are to be made between coal and oil industries,  they should
     use the same basis for comparison.
Answer:  This is correct and allowance for this factor is taken into considera-
     tion in the analysis.  The 1.6 trillion tons represents an upper bound;
     not all of it is  economically recoverable.

Quest iot. (Dr. .7. E. Davoud. D-Cycle Power):  A 17. efficiency was mentioned for
     solar conversion and  agricultural conversion of crops  to fuel.  This is
     generally accepted, but are there prospects for improving this, such as:
     selected breeding, fast growing crops, etc?
Answer:  There are prospects for improvement to perhaps 27,  (do-able), but beyond
     that it  is doubtful.
                                     -238-

-------
C.   Alternative  Fuels,  by Dr.  R.  M. Kant. Esso Reserach and Engineering
This program  Is being conducted toward the same objecti.es and with the same
scope  and work statement as the IGT program reviewed above.

An initial  list of candidate fuels was narrowed down in the first phase of the
study  and the following fuels were identified for detailed analysis:  gasoline
and distillate fn>» shale and coal, and methanol from coal (Fig. 146).  The
first  part  of the analysis focused on the economics of producing, manufacturing
and marketing these fuels.  The conversion technology in each case was chosen
on the basis  of a combination of factors:  (I) a good probability that it will
be commercialized. (2) capable of producing high yields of liquids and (3)
availability  of sufficient published information to allow an economic analysis
(Fig.  147).  It  is likely that processes other than those indicated will also
be commercialized and may eventually be favored.  It is simply too early to
make such a judgment.

Based on the  choice of technology,  it was possible to estimate the cost of
the various alternate fuels at various stages between the recovery of the
resource and  the  distribution of the final automotive fuel at the pump.'  It
is estimated  that none of these fuels will be produced in significant quanti-
ties before 1979  in the case of shale fuels and 1981-83 ^n the case of hydro-
carbon liquids  fron coal.  The technology for producing methanol from coal via
coal gasification is further along  than the other alternates, but, allowing
for construction time, it is difficult to see how such a commercial plant
could be on-streatn before 1979 at  the earliest.  Projections were made for
these fuel  costs  thro-:ph  ;.he year  2000 (Fig. 148).  These projections attempt
to take account  of potential improvements in technology as well as compensating
features such as  increasing cost of coal and the need to build new pipelines.
The projections  also show the effect of the so-called "learning curve" repre-
senting evolutionary improvements  rather  than more substantial breakthroughs
in technology.   The relative cost  of the  fuels is not changed over this time
period.
                                      -239-

-------
tsj
£>
O
         FUEL
         OLINE   "1
         TI LLATE /
GAS
DIS
METHANOL
      ETHANOl
      METHANE
      HYDROGEN
      AMMONIA
      HYDRAZINE
                     SOURCE
SHALE
COAL
COAL
CHOSEN FOR
DETAI LED STUDY
                  CARBOHYDRATES
                  COAL
                  COAL  OR WATER
                  COAL  OR WATER
                  AMMONIA
                         Fig. 146 Candidate Fuels

-------
i
10
         j SHALE
       UNDERGROUND
          MINING
        RETORTI NG
      Tosco  RETORT
            i
        UPGRADING
     SEVERE  HYDRO G,
     BOTTOMS  COKING
        PIPELINING
         SYNCRUDE
         To  RE F,
         REFINING
        C R A C K I N G,
        REFORMING
       DISTRIBUTION
        GASOLINE &
        DISTILLATE
                C 0 A L
          SURFACE  MINING]
                        HYDROGENATION
   H-COAL
LURGI FOR
 PIPELINING
  SYNCRUDE
   To  R E F,
  REFINING
  CRACKING/
  REFORMING
D I STRI BUT ION
 GASOLINE  &
 DISTILLATE
                   GAS IFI CAT ION +
                 METHANOL  SYNTHESI S
  LURGI  FOR  CO+H2
  Low  PRESS, METH,
   SYNTH,
    PIPELINING
  (OR  UNIT  TRAIN )
    METHANOL  To
    BULK TERM,
   DISTRIBUTION
METHANOL 0 R M E T H, /
GASOL, BLENDED  AT  PUMP
                     Fig. 147  Process Basis for Economic Evaluation

-------
NETHANOL
COALGASOL.   J
CoAL_DlSTILLi_
    GASQL.
                                       1—4,00
                                       -3.00
                                          $/MM  BTU
                                          AT  PUMP,
                                          Ex,   TAX
                                       -2,00
         1980
1990
2000
         Fig. 148  Cost Projections for Alternative Fuels
                         -242-

-------
The efficiencies of resource utilization are another parameter for assessing
alternative fuels (Fig. 149).  The overall efficiency for the production of
shale fuels is lower than that for coal fuels, reflecting losses during under-
ground mining and retorting.  Improvements in these two areas might reasonably
be expected as the industry grows, which would affect the overall efficiency
of resource utilization.  Alternatively, the efficiency of coal liquefaction
could be improved if more selective catalysts and processes are developed.  In
the case of methanol from coal, the particular Lurgi gasification process
benefits from the potential utilization of liquid by-products as process fuel.
If this is not possible, the efficiency of the overall methanol production
scheme would be significantly lower than that for coal liquefaction.

Another major part of the study considered the performance of these alternate
fuels.  Unfortunately,  there are relatively few data on the product quality
and the performance of  shale and coal derived fuels.  It was therefore
necessary to infer potential problems and advantages on the basis of very
limited information.

Gasolines from coal and shale are expected to have similar aroinaties content
to petroleum gasolines  at high octane numbers (Fig. 150).

Shale distillates are expected to have acceptable cetane numbers for use as
automotive Diesel fuels.  However, these materials ire rather paraffinic and
could lead to excessive pour points in low temperature truck applications.
De-waxing or pour depressant additives are potential solutions to this pro-
blem.  Coal distillates probably will have cetane numbers too low for use as
Diesel fuels.  The solutions to this problem would include diversion of the
distillate to other uses, blending with shale or petroleum fractions, or  the
use of cetane improvers.  More data are required to evaluate the suitability
of coal distillates as  gas  turbine fuels.

Turning to methanol, this alternative fuel could lead to increased  thermal
efficiencies in spark-ignition engines (Fig.  151), if proper modifications are
made, taking account of high octane number, low volatility, high heat of
                                     -243-

-------
SHALE HYDROCARBONS
 MINING
 RETORTING
 UPGRAD ING  &  REFINING
      OVERALL
COAL  HYDROCARBONS
 MINING
 LIQUEFACT ION
 REFINING
      OVERALL
METHANOL  FROM  COAL
 MINING
 SYNTHES I S
      OVERALL
                                FRACTION  OF  ENERGY
                               IN  CRUDE  RECOVERED IN
                            	TOTAL PRODUCT	
                                         GASOL,  & DIST,
                            G'ASOLINE       CO-PRODUCTS


0 , 70
0, 33

0 , 85
0, 55


n
U i
n
. .... , y §
•
n
• ••'— U i
.
n
1 ' • U i
0,
fi n
o u
8ru
u —
8r
j
7 r

b
fi T *

55


0 , 82
0 , 39

0 , 95
0 , 60


'ASSUMES LIQUID  BY-PRODUCTS FROM GASIFICATION
  USED AS FUEL,
CAN BE
                Fig. 149 Efficiencies of Resource Utilization

-------
GASOLINES
  • LIKE PETROLEUM  AT  HIGH OCTANES
      --CA,  60%  AROMATICS AT 95 RES,  0, N,  (CLEAR)
      -- DUE  TO CATALYTIC  REFORMING  RESPONSE OF
          NAPHTHAS
  9 COAL NAPHTHAS  MORE  AROMATIC THAN  SHALE  NAPHTHAS
  e NEED MOTOR  AND  ROAD OCTANE DATA
  o NO SULFUR  OR  NITROGEN PROBLEMS FORESEEN
DISTI LLATES
  e SHALE DISTILLATES  SHOULD HAVE ACCEPTABLE  CETANE
    NUMBER  UO-45), BUT  MAY HAVE POUR POINT  PROBLEMS
    FOR LOW-TEMP, TRUCK AP FLICS,
  9 COAL DISTILLATES  PROBABLY WILL HAVE CETANE
    NUMBERS  TOO  LOW  FOR AUTO,  DIESELS:  CAN  DIVERT
    TO OTHER  USES, BLEND,   USE CETANE IMPROVERS, ETC,
  • NO SULFUR  OR NITROGEN  PROBLEMS FORESEEN
  9 NEED DIESEL  AND  GAS TURBINE PERFORMANCE DATA
         Fig. 150  Performance of Coal and Shale Gasoline and Distillates

-------

-------
vaporization and  low heat  of combustion.  However, such a modified engine would
not be  suitable for conventional fuels.  Methanol has excellent potential as a
gas turbine fuel,  particularly for stationary turbines where distribution costs
are much  lower than in the case of automotive fuels.  Finally, methanol  is an
attractive fuel for fuel  cells either for direct use or via reforming  to
hydrogen.

Recently, much publicity  has been given to the proposal to use methanol/gaso-
line blends as an automotive fuel in the near-term future.  It is important to
assess  the potential problems and advantages associated with such a strategy
(Fig. 152).  Methanol/gasoline blends are very water sensitive so that it is
essential that a  dry blend be supplied  to the consumer and that it not pick
up significant quantities of water during use.  Conceivably, it may be possible
to prevent or circumvent  this water sensitivity problem, but information in
this area is not  yet available.  Also, methanol and gasoline form extremely
non-ideal solutions which leads to high vapor pressures.  In the case of
gasoline, the high vapor  pressure would probably result in vapor lock, neces-
sitating a reformulation  of the gasoline by backing out butanes and possibly
some pentanes.   If this is necessary, the value of aduing methanol, from the
point of view of  energy conservation, is questionable, unless alternate  dis-
position is provided  for  the displaced hydrocarbons which is of higher value
 than their use  in gasoline.  It is important to demonstrate tue effect of
 these potential problems  on vehicle driveability — e.g., acceleration,
 starting, stalling,  etc.

 On the other hand, the use of methanol/gasoline blends would have certain
 benefits including high blending octane and potentially some improvement in
 fuel economy measured  in  miles per BTU.  Emissions with methanol/gasoline
 blends would be  lower, in most modes o£ operation, but the  improvement would
 not be sufficient to attain 1975+ standards without the use of catalytic
 converters.

 In the course of  the  study, a number of information gaps were  identified
 (pig. 153).  Most of  these involve the  need for developing  new and  improved
 technology as well as  commercially demonstrating  the effectiveness  of
 existing technology.
                                     -247-

-------
KJ
4^
00
0 DEFINE POTENTIAL  PROBLEMS AND ADVANTAGES  FOR
  SPARK-IGNITION  ENGINES,

ft POTENTIAL  PROBLEMS:
   -- WATER SENSITIVITY;  PHASE  SEP' N,  WITH <0,5%
      H20  FOR 15% MECH  AT  R, TEMP, --ANY COST-
      EFFECTIVE FIXES?
   - - VOLATILITY AND VAPOR  LOCK:  NON-IDEAL SOLU-
      TIONS LEAD TO HIGH  VAPOR  PRESSURES - - T0  AVOID
      VAPOR LOCK,  MAY  HAVE TO BACK OUT  CfjUC5),
   -- DRI VEABI LITY :  DO  ABOVE  RESULT  IN POOR
      PERFORMANCE -- IS  LEANING  OUT  WITH METHANOL
      A PROBLEM?

8 PROBABLE  BENEFITS:
   -- HIGH  BLENDING OCTANE
   -- LOWER EMISSIONS
   --IMPROVED  FUEL ECONOMY  (MILES/BTU)
                    Fig. 152  Performance of Methanol/Gasoline Blends

-------
       FUEL              AREA                 NEEDED
   HYDROCARBONS      MINING*          -LARGE DEMO, OF SPENT
   FROM  SHALE        RETORTING           SHALE DISPOSAL
                                   •-IN SITU RETORTING

                    UPGRADING*       -BETTER DENITROG,  CATS
                    REFINING          -MILD VS,  SEVERE  UP-
                                       GRADING AT MINE

   HYDROCARBONS      LIQUEFACTION    *-MORE EFFICIENT PROCESS
   FROM  COAL                            FOR Ho FROM COAL
                                   * - M 0 R E SELECTIVE HYDRO G,
§                                      REACTION
vO
                    REFINING          -RESPONSE OF PROCESSES
                                       TO VARIOUS QUALITY
                                       COALS

   METHANOL         MANUFACTURE     '-IMPROVED COAL GASIF.
   FROM  COAL                            PROCESS
                                     -MORE EFFICIENT MEOH
                                       SYNTHESIS

    FOR ALL FUELS  NEED  PRODUCT  QUALITY AND PERFORMANCE
    DATA,  ALONE  AND IN BLENDS,  IFI  VARIOUS AUTO,  POWER  PLANTS,
                        Fig. 153  Summary of Data Gaps

-------
The overall conclusions of the study  indicate that coal and oil shale are the
best source for alternative automotive  fuels.  Although the resource is vast,
environmental, social, legal, as well as  technical constraints will limit the
rate o£ production.  A3 a result, complete replacement of petroleum with
synthetic fuels is improbable and unnecessary until after the year 2000.
Shale and coal hydrocarbons will be blended with petroleum as they become
available.  Their compatibility with  petroleum is a major advantage.  Capital
commitments are now being made which  tends to confirm this scenario.

Methanol could also be an alternative fuel for spark-ignition engines, but
the modifications required would make the engine unsuitable for operating on
conventional  fuels.   It seems more desirable to dedicate methanol for use in
gas turbines, particularly of the stationary variety.  This would release
hydrocarbons, which are now being used  in this application, for use as auto-
motive fuel.

Questions and Comments
Question (P. Wilson, Chrysler Corporation):   Please explain the 2070 to 30%
    improvement in I.e. engine efficiency using methanol.
Answer:  To take full advantage of the  characteristics of the mechanol, sig-
    nificant changes in engine design  such as compression ratio, carburetion,
    Ok»nifold design, etc. can bring  about such improvements in efficiency.

Question (R. Probst, Federal Mogul Corporation):  Is work being done on
    methanol-based fuels mixed with  materials other than gasoline?
Answer:  Shale and coal derived materials should blend as well with methanol
    as gasoline.  Work using other non-hydrocarbon materials has not been
    reported if it is going on.  Higher  molecular weight material just won't
    mix, so you are  limited to gasoline  types of material, ethers or higher
    boiling alcohols.
                                     -250-

-------
Question (Dr.  L.  Eltinge, Eaton Corporation):  Where does the rising cost of
     petroleum cross the declining costs of alternative fuels shown in Fig. 148?
Answer:   There is really no way of projecting what the price of petroleum
     vill be due to numerous political as well as economic factors which
     will influence the price.  Over the last year, the ex-tax price has gone
     from $2.60 to $3.50/KM BTU's at the pump.  It might go as high as $4.00
     before reaching a plateau, or even declining.

Question (Dr.  W.  Hrynischak, Clarke Chapman):  What effect can nuclear heat
     have on coal gasification and shale oil extraction?
Answer:   It can have a very pronounced effect on cost.  Gulf-Shell is con-
     sidering various schemes for using the  High Temperature Gas Cooled
     Reactor for coal conversion.  But considering the time to design, build
     and test the system (5-7 years to prove system), it will be 10-15 yoars
     before significant production can be achieved.  This factor was not
     considered in the study.

D.   Combustion Studies, by Richard W. Hum, U.S. Bureau of Mines  (Guest
     Presentation)
 In late March, the U.S. Bureau of Mines signed an inter-agency agreement with
 the EPA to do a jointly supported experimental investigation of the per-
 formance of:
          • methanol and methyl fuel
          • methanol-gasoline (derived from  synthetics) blends (basically
            91 and 96 octane level-;; and aromatics in the range of 15
            and 40%)
          • coal and shale derived gasoline  distillate fuels.
                                     -251-

-------
Tests will be run with  engines on dynamometers and in vehicles on current
production and on near  term candidate low emission alternate automotive power-
plants.  Lean combustion limits,  emissions and fuel economy maps, stoichio-
metry of mixtures, blend stability,  water-alcohol miscibility, and motor-road
octanes will be  investigated.   Prime attention will be focused on problems
anticipated for  the  customer-user of the fuels.

Recent requests  of the  Government for industry to recommend realistic alter-
                                    •>
native fuels to  give relief from dependence on foreign sources of crude oil
in the 1980-1985 time frame resulted in only one clear answer:  coal gaisfica-
tlon and methanol.   This explains the focus on methanol.

Fifty barrels of synthetic crude produced from Utah coal is being obtained.
This will be further processed by pertinent current technology and processes
to gasoline and  distillates for test and evaluation at the Bureau of Mines.
It is expected  that  these fuels will have hydrogen deficiency.

Questions and Comments
Comment  (T. A.  Guldman, Chevron Research):  Since the Bureau of Mines asked
     the  Industry to suggest alternate fuels, a large amount of capital
     (about  $400,000,000) has been invested in shale; also, the suggestion
     has been made  to substitute coal for liquid fuels (residual) which are
     being burned.   This provides some alternatives 3ther than just methanol.
     Methanol has enough disadvantages so that its introduction could be
     delayed.   Corrosion and cost are examples.  Materials compatibility is
     an  important consideration.
Answer:  Corrosion and materials compatibility problems are recognized and are
     being considered in the program.  Large production of shale oil is of
     definite  interest, but economic and environmental problems are very
     difficult  in the near term time frame.
                                     -252-

-------
 E.   Fundamental Combustion  Research  - National Science Foundation (Guest
     Presentation)
 As part of an expanded  effort  by EPA  and others to coordinate the various
 activities in alternate automotive fuels research and development, EPA is
 working with NSF to conduct  fundamental engiae combustion research.

 About  $700,000 will be  spent in FY '74 and about $1,000,000 in FY '75 for
 research grants at a  number  of universities on fundamental research  as related
 to conventional engines and  near term future alternate engines, such as the
 stratified charge engine.  They will  be looking at microscopic or fundamental
 combustion of current and  alternate fuels to expand our knowledge and tech-
 nology in this area.

 F.   Storage of Hydrogen by  Hydrides, by J. J. Rellly. Brookliaven National
     Laboratory
 Hydrogen would make an  ideal fuel for almost all types of energy converters
- including the internal  combustion engine.  It is essentially non-polluting
 and  it can be made from readily available, abundant raw materials and primary
 energy sources.  However,  a  major problem involved in using hydrogen as a
 common fuel  is the difficulty encountered in its storage arid bulk (non-pipe-
 line)  transport.

 Storage as a compressed gas  seems impractical and hopelessly non-competitive
 because of the weight,  expense and bulk of the storage vessels.  Liquid hydro-
 gen  may be useful  in  certain circutnt-tances, but the energy required for lique-
 faction is a large fraction  of that which is later generated by its  combustion.
 An even more important  consideration is that liquid hydrogen would present a
 serious and, probably,  insoluble safety problem if it were to be considered as
 a common fuel for  individual use (e.g., automobile).  However, there is an
 alternative  to the conventional storage methods which at this date appears
 quite  attractive,  i.e., storage of hydrogen as a metal hydride.   It is well
 known  that some hydrides contain far more hydrogen per unit volume than does
 liquid hydrogen.   It  has been the goal of the Brookhaven research program  to
 develop hydrides - or,  rather, hydrogen-metal systems - which will have a  high
 hydrogen content and  which will meet  certain requirements imposed by their use
 in conjunction with devices  that use  hydrogen for the production of energy.
                                      -253-

-------
Some of the pertinent properties of metal-hydrogen systems  in general  are
summarized.  Those of interest  for our  purpose  are exothermic;  i.e., heat is
evolved when hydrogen is absorbed.  They  are  almost always  reversible, and
the hydrogen can be recovered by lowering the pressure  below, or raising the
temperature above, the pressure and temperature required for the absorption
process.  At a given temperature, each  hydride  is  in equilibrium with  a definite
pressure of hydrogen, its  "decomposition  pressure".  If hydrogen is withdrawn
and the pressure drops, decomposition occurs  until the  evolved hydrogen has
built up to the decomposition pressure  again.

This pressure  is a function not only  of the temperature but also of the amount
of hydrogen in the solid phase. This quantity  is  not usually constant, as
in stoichiometric compounds such as chlorides,  but can often vary within
rather wide limits.  The way in which the dissociation pressure changes with
the composition of the  solid is shown in  Fig. 154  for a typical, if slightly
idealized, system.  As  hydrogen is  taken  up by  the metal end the ratio H/M
increases, the equilibrium pressure  increases rather steeply until the point  A
is reached.  Up to this  point  the  solid consists of a solution of hydrogen in
metal  rather than a compound.   At  higher  concentrations, however, a second
phase appears, having  the  composition B;  and the addition of hydrogen will not
result  in  an increase of  the equilibrium pressure  until all of the solid phase
has attained this composition.  Above this "plateau" region, further enrich-
ment of  the solid  in hydrogen  requires  a  steep  increase in pressure.  The
curves  labeled 1  and T  in the same  figure show the effect on the pressure-
                                                                           o
composition relation of  raising thr  temperature.  At temperatures above 400 C,
hysteresis is  usually absent and  the  equilibrium pressure is the same whether
hyd-ogen has been added  to or removed from the  system.

Hydride heats  of  formation, AH ,  can  be determined either by calorimetry or
by determining the temperature-dependence of decomposition pressure.  Hydrides
which have a high decomposition pressure  at low temperatures generally have a
relatively small value  of  AH .
                                     -254-

-------
UM
o:
Ul

Q.

Z
UJ
o
o
cr
o
                                         B
          HYDROGEN-TO-METAL RATIO
     Fig.  154   Pressure vs.  Composition Isotherms in a
               Typical Hydrogen-Metal System
                       -255-

-------
Rates of hydrogen-metal reactions  vary widely,  and depend on several factors.
One  is the intrinsic nature  of  the system.   Thus,  certain titanium-cobalt
alloys react, even when in large chunks,  almost as fast as hydrogen can be
supplied, while pure magnesium  powder reacts very  slowly.  Another factor is
cleanliness of metal surface; an oxide film will often result in a long
induction period before a good  rate is attained.  Still another factor is the
          (*j
state of subdivision of the  metal.  This  can usually be greatly increased by
subjecting a sample to a series of hydriding-dehydriding cycles.  Absolute
surface areas as high as 2 square  meters  per gram have been obtained in this
way, and the product was highly active toward hydrogen.  Finally, it is possi-
ble  to  increase  the rate of  the combination reaction by the addition of small
quantities of solid catalysts.   Thus, the formation of MgH. is accelerated
by the  presence of nickel  (or more accurately Mg Ni).

There are a number of criteria  by  which one may judge the suitability of a
metal-hydrogen system for  energy storage.  For example, it was mentioned
above that the hydrides are  exothermic and that energy must be supplied for
their decomposition.  This need not, however, be a source of inefficiency.
All  energy producing devices, whether fuel cells or combustion engines,
produce waste heat and  it  should be possible to utilize this heat for the
decomposition of  the dydride.   We  therefore require a balance between the heat
produced and  that  required,  both as to quantity and quality (temperature).
In other words,  the hydride  should have an appreciable decomposition pressure
(at  least one atmosphere)  at the  temperature of operation of the energy-
producing device.  The  application of hydride storage to hydrogen fueled
vehicles is  shown in  Fig.  155.   There are, of course, additional criteria
by which one can  judge  the worth of a material according to one's particular
needs.  For  example,  a  unique set  of criteria has been developed by which any
candidate metal-hydrogen  system can be measured against the EPA program goals.
These criteria are listed  as Fig.  156.  We have also experimentally screened
a large number of  alloys.  All  of  these materials, when judged by this parti-
cular set of criteria,  score lower than catalyzed magnesium hydride and can
be eliminated as  hydrogen  storage  media.   It should be noted that the criteria,
as presently constituted,  include  reversibility.  This specification, when
                                     -256-

-------
       Air
Hydrogen  I.e. Engine
                                                         Hydrogen Storage
                                                             As  Hydride
                                                                                     Hydrogen
                                                                                     Refuel  Port
                                                                                      HO Vapor

                                                                                      Exhaust
                  Fig. 155  Application of Hydride Storage to Hydrogen Fueled Vehicles

-------
 I
NJ
                          1 - Special apparatus and oxtreme conditions arr necessary

                          S - Reaction takis place In »ltu with heating, cooling or
                              prc&sur Ual Ion
drpE' n Contfni (by weight)

 K - Cor.tatns Ins than j* hyJroRrn

 1 • Contains 5 - 101

 3 - Contain"  10 • 20X

 5 - Contains core than 20^


 Jrft^i-n Cont* nt (hy voluwi-)

 x  - Contains  leas thjn -t x  10   atoms )l/ml of hydride

  1  -  Contnlns  4  to  6  X  10   atoms H/ffll of hydride

  2  •  Contains 6  to  8  x  \o'? atoms H/ml of hydride

  3  •  Contains 8  to  10 x  10*  .itoos  ll/ml  of hydride

  5 - Contains nore than 10  x iU   moms H/ml  of  hydride

 re1; suH'/Ti'^p'T.it'irc Pel it t on
  x  • P > 1000 psla •? 150°F
      T > 570°F " 15 r«<»
   1  • P • I  10 2000 p3lj ti liO° F
      T • 390 to  570CF @ 15 naU
   2  - P • 500 to  1000 psla   15 psla  0.4 Ht. of Combustion

   I  -  0.2 <  HD/llc • 0.4

   3  -  0.1 f  Hp/ Hc <• 0.2

   5  - HD/Hc  < 0.1


Safety  (Hydrl.K-u and Dehydrldcd)

K - More hazardous than  gasoline

1 • Same  overall degree  oi hazard as gasolii.'.1

3 • Somcwhac  less  hazardous than gasoline

5 - Significantly  less  ta.*ardou* than gasoline
                                                                             of hydrogen
   « - Huri-  lhan  S100O  (2O  «•!• nasoltn* «qulval«nt) n«ar
       Lon«  ranK« JvalUMlliy unlikely

   1 - S'>00  to $1000 nc.tr and  long  tersi
       l.oi>u  rangit availability In doubt            ^

   3 • $200  105500 nrar and long  tern
       Availability reasonably certain

   S - -}200 nvar and ionj  tern
       Availability terrain
                                                                                                               f riles
   x • Low oi. It ing point.   Volatile In operating range.   Corrosive, etc.

   1 • fi.piM.i marginally jiteptable

   5 - Aiccptabte


Reaction Kini-tlcs

   x - Rate Inadequate regardless  of  equipment  design

   1 - Rate  adequate but  equipment complex

   5 - Pate adequate  In simple  equipment


The mwi 1 Conduct I vl Ey

   x - Limits hydrogen availability regardless  of equipment

   1 - Accept.ible for use  but with complex hcat., exciiange  equipment

   5 - Rate adequate  In blffiple  equipment



Cyclic Stability - physical

   x - F.ffrcllvc for  ' 100 cycles

   1 - Effective for  100 to 300 cycles

   3 - Effective for  300 to 500 cycles

   5 - Effective for  riore  than  500 cycles

Cycl ic Stability - contamination

   x -  Less than 300 cycl  s with  high purity gas (HPC)
        Less tlun 100 cycKs with  normal purity «as (NPC)

   1 - 300 to 500 cycles (HPC)
       100 to 300 cycloi (STC)
       < 100 cy.-lu s  with  irrpun- gas  (1C)
   3 • > 500 cycles willi HPt:                      '•
       > 300 tyuli-3 with NTC
       100-300 cycler with  10
   5 • •> 500 cycles with NPC
       •> 300 cycles with 1C
                                                                                                                                                         Key:

                                                                                                                                                              x  - Rejects candidate
                                                                                                                                                              0  - Unknown
                                                                                                                                                          1 to 5  • Rating scale
                                                .  1 
-------
applied In the usual  sense, eliminates certain complex hydrides (e.g.,
Mg(AlH4)2), which otherwise may be very attractive as hydrogen storage  media.
At present such compounds can only be made indirectly using wet chemical
techniques.

F.cure work will exaaine the possibility of simplifying the synthesis of  such
compounds through  tha use of catalysts and/or alternate wet chemical reactions.
Thus, if simple novel syntheses are possible, such systems, even if not,
directly reversible,  could then be considered as practical hydrogen storage
media.

Questions and  Comments
Question:  How do  you store hydrogen  in the hydride; do you have to refri-
     gerate  the  system?
Answer:  While charging the system, heat of formation is removed by water or
     coolant.  While storing, the pressure is raised to the equilibrium
     pressure;  this may be 300-400 Psi.

G.   Gasoline-Hydrogen Fuel "lends, by  R.  Sreshears, Jet Propulsion Laboratory
A high-efficiency, low-emission engine  development project is currently
underway, sponsored by NASA and EPA.  The  feasibility demonstration phase
has been completed and the validation phase  is now in progress.

The system has the potential of meeting the  EPA  1977 standards while sig-
nificantly  improving fuel economy.   It  will use  current fuels and engines,
will have similar response characteristics to current engines, and will be
low in  cost  considering both initial  cost  and fuel savings.

The concept  (See.  Fig. 157)  is  to use small  amounts  of hydrogen to allow  the
burning of gasoline at ultra-lean conditions.  The hydrogen is generated
aboard  the vehicle by feeding gasoline  and air to a  hydrogen generator which
produces hydrogen and carbon monoxide.  The  generated gas  is mixed with gaso-
line and fed to a conventional  engine.  The  required hydrogen  is produced  in
                                     -259-

-------
          GASOLINE
O
I
                                       ACCELERATOR
                              FLOW CONTROL  j	
                                 VALVE
                                                    GASOLINE
                                   GENERATOR
H2 + CO
                         AIR
                                                             1
                                                                     AIR
                       _L
                                                          INDUCTION SYSTEM
                                                            CONVENTIONAL
                                                               ENGINE
                Fig. 157  JPL System for Low Emission Combustion in a Conventional SI Engine

-------
 the generator,  and no hydrogen is stored aboard  the vehicle.   Previously,
 water was also  fed to the hydrogen generator, but recent  generator develop-
 ments allow elimination of water feed.

 In the initial  single cylinder, CFR-engine work  emissions from various
 fuels were compared in terms of grams of emission per horsepower-hour pro-
 duced and combustion conditions expressed in  terms of equivalence  ratio.
 In CFR engine experiments it was showr. that NOx  emissions from gasoline could
 be reduced slightly by lean operation.  With  gasoline fuel levels  equivalent
 to the EPA 1977 standard could not be achieved because  misfire limits the
 minimum equivalence ratio to about 0.63.  With hydrogen,  however,  the engine
 was operated down to equivalence ratios of 0.1 where  the  NO*  emissions  are
 less than l/LOO of the EPA standard and in fact  down  to the EPA ambient air
 standard (0.25  ppm).  Since the extremely low NOx emissions achievable  by
 lean combustion with pure hydrogen are not required,  it is more practical  to
 use small amounts of hydrogen to extend the operating range for gasoline down
 into the ultra-lean region.  It is desirable  to  limit the amount of hydrogen
. needed to minimize the generator size and reduce the  effect of generator inef-
 ficiency on overall fuel economy.  Mixtures of hydrogen and gasoline in both
 the CFR and V-8 engines showed very low NOx emissions in  the  ultra-lean region
 (Fig. 158).  Carbon monoxide emissions were measured  and  found also to  be
 below the EPA 1977 standards, as long as adequate quantities  of hydrogen were
 used to avoid misfire (Fig. 159).  Hydrocarbon emissions  have been measured
 and found to be above the EPA 1977 standard  (Fig. 160).   Further work will be
 needed to reduce hydrocarbon emissions.

 The engine thermal efficiency was measured and found  to be substantially
 increased by operation in the ultra-lean region  (Fig. 161).  Engine thermal
 efficiency data were taken across the rpm range  at  level  road load conditions
 with gasoline only at maximum efficiency spark advance  and equivalence  ratio.
 The data for the same engine and induction system, but  using  hydrogen and  gaso-
 line, showed a  substantial increase of thermal efficiency. A further increase
 in efficiency was shown by increasing turbulence in  the combustion chamber.
 This was done by using shrouded valves (Fig.  162); other  techniques should
 also be effective.
                                     -261-

-------
100.00.00
 10.00.00
 1.0C.OO
  .101100
  .01.01
 .001001
                                             CD

                                               o
                                   o
                                   o
00
         197Z.EPAJIANDARP

        (0.4gm/mi EQUIVALENT)
                                I
        N » 2000 RPM.


  A  H2 ONLY

  O  H2 + INDOLENE-30-

  O  INDOLENE-30 ONLY
       0   .1   .2   .3   .4   .5   .6   .7   .8    .9   1.0  1.1  1.2

                         EQUIVALENCE RATIO, 0
                    Fig. 158  NO Emissions V-8 Engine
                            -262-

-------
U!
I
          T
          12-
      I
      Q.
      o:
      CO
      •z.
      o

      to
      en
O
O
          10
           8
                                            A H2 ONLY


                                            o H2 + INDOLENE-30


                                            ifr INDOLENE-30 ONLY
           (3.4g/mi EQUIV)
                                                  P
                                                   oo
           2



           0
                                                         §
                                                              OO
                                                          00
0
                    ^—A
             .1      .2   ~ .3"  ~ .4
                                                 .5      .6
.7
.8     .9
1.0
                                      EQUIVALENCE RATIO
                                     Fig. 159   CO Emissions V-8 Engine

-------
14
£ 12
 i
Q_
GO

O


CO


UJ

2:
O
CO
oc

o
o
o;
   10-
 8
                 1977 EPA STANDARD
               (0.41 gm/mi EQUIVALENT)

                          \          «
                                             A H2 ONLY

                                             o H2 +  INDOLENE-30

                                             O INDOLENE-30 ONLY
                                       o
                                      CP
                                      o  o
                                           00
                A

                -J_
           0  §
           —ofio	o--O.
  0
.2
.3
.4
.5
                                                 .6
.7
.9    1.0
                            EQUIVALENCE RATIO 
                         Fig. 160   Hydrocarbon Emissions V-8 Engine

-------
S3
Ul
I
        40
     o
     z
     UJ



     E  30
     u_
     LU
     a:
     LU
   20
O
                                             00
         10L
          0
      N -  2000 RPM


    H2 ONLY


o   H2 +  INDOLENE-30



-------
   45
  40 -
O
   30
UJ
in
•—
o
£
— 20
                                                 H2 GASOLINE AND
                                                 SHROUDED  VALVES
                                                    -O
                                                         H2 + GASOLINE
                                                          GASOLINE ONLY
                                            V-8 ENGINE SYSTEM
                                            AUTOTRONICS INDUCTION
                                            LFVEL ROAD LOAD
                                            HIGH GEAR
   15
      1200
                    1500
1800         2100
ENGINE SPEED,  rpm
2400
2700
                      Fig. 162  Turbulence Effects on Engine Efficiency

-------
The current V-8 engine  hydrogen requirements  to avoid  misfire are about 6/.
hydrogen by weight  in  fuel at an equivaler e  ratio  of  0.55.   This should be
compared with  the lean  flaramibility limit of  1.57. by weight  of hydrogen.  The
CFR-engine requires about 27. hydrogen to avoid misfire (Fig.  163).  This
Indicates that substantial reduction in the V-8 engine hydrogen requirements
should be possible.  Testing has been initiated to  evaluate  the effects of
engine modifications,  such ab improved fuel atonization and  distribution,
Improved .ignition system, and increased combustion  chamber turbulence on the
lean limit hydrogen requirements and hydrocarbon  emissions.

The most critical development of this system  is the hydrogen generator.
The design chosen  is similar to that used  for commercial production of hydrogen
from hydrocarbons.   (The process is called partial  oxidation hydrogen genera-
tion.  See Fig.  164.)   In this process, gasoline  and air are reacted at 1500
to 2000°F, forming  hydrogen, carbon monoxide, plus  various hydrocarbons and
diluents.  Heat  is  supplied by pumping air  into the generator and burning a
portion of the gasoline.  The reaction takes  place  in  a reactor with or
without  the  use  of  catalysts.  The maximum theoretical hydrogen yield for a
hydrogen generator  with water, gasoline and air feed  in 297. by volume.  When
no water feed is used, the generator air/fuel moss  ratio must be greater than
5 to avoid soct formation.  Under these conditions  the maxijjum theoretical
hydrogen yield is  24% by volume.  The current catalytic generator will yield
221 by volume hydrogen without producing  soot.  This  operation is achieved
only with gasoline  and air feed, and no water is  used.  The catalytic generator
has an efficiency of 807..  These data show a  major  improvement over the much
larger and earlier  thermal generator which  produced 14.5% bv volume hydrogen
with an  efficiency  of 67% and required water  feed (Fig. 165).

Engine and hydrogen generator Integration tests were  made with the V-8 engine
and the  early thermal generator and also  with a catalytic generator.  The
early thermal generator/engine combination showed about the same thermal
efficiency as the  unmodified engine.  The higher  performance catalytic hydro-
gen generator engine combination showed a substantial  efficiency increase as
compared with the  unmodified engine.  This  improvement is in terms of  the
                                    -267-

-------
 CO
100


 50


 30

 20



 10
o
o
                           ^\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\;
                           §HIGH EMISSION^
                               OPERATING
                                 REGION
                           EMISSION^SSHIGH
                        OPERATING
                                       BonifD GAS CAR;
                              ^^OPERATING POINT;
                              SS k\ VVXN.VVVVV' *VVVVV\\VK
-   LEAN
FLAMM ABILITY
       LIMIT

"CFR ENGINE
 MISFIRE LIMIT

 BASELINE  DESIGN
                  V-8 ENGINE
                  MISFIRE LIMIT
         0  0.1  0.2 0.3  0.4  0.5  0.6  0.7 0.8  0.9 1.0

                      EQUIVALENCE RATIO, 
             Fig.  163  Engine Hydrogen Requirements

                           -268-

-------
           Cg H,g
8 CO + 9 H,
AIR
GASOLINE
            000000000050
                              GENERATOR
         PRODUCTS TO ENGINE
   Fig.  164   Partial Oxidation Hydrogen Generator
                   -269-

-------
          40
i
NJ
--J
O
      =1
      _J
      o

      CO
      O
      O
                                                     •THEORETICAL EQUILIBRIUM
                                                     CALCULATIONS (NO WATER)
          30
          20
          10
                            CURRENT CATALYTIC
                            GENERATOR
                            PERFORMANCE DATA
                            (NO WATER)
                                                 EARLY THERMAL GENERATOR
                                                 PERFORMANCE
                                                 (WATER/FUEL • 0.8)
            o
345
AIR/FUEL MASS RATIO
8
                                 Fig.  165  Hydrogen Generator Performance

-------
combined  indicated  thermal  efficiency of the engine/generator combination
(Fig.  166).  The baseline design point represents an improved engine with
reduced hydrogen requirements.   This represents a 25% increase in efficiency
over the  unmodified engine.

A bottled-gas car has  been  built (Fig. 167) which used the experimental
induction system and uses hydrogen from high-pressure cylinders mounted in the -
trunk.  This car was tested using the EPA CVS cycle.  The results to date
show a dramatic reduction of KOoc and CO emissions and a reduction of 347. in
total fuel BTU's  (Fig. 168).  In a hydrogen-generator-equipped car,  approxi-
mately 25% improvement in fuel economy is expected.

The overall status  of  the JPL system is:
          e A compact  high-performance hydrogen generator has been demonstrated.
          • A V-8 engine has been operated wit_h a hydrogen generator.
          • The bottled-gas car shows high efficiency, low NOx, and CO
            emissions.

Future plans include:
          • Fully characterize the engine/generator combination.
          • Investigate the generator start-up and control problems.
          • Test  the engine modifications to reduce engine hydrogen require-
            ments.

Current plans call  for completion of the characterization by September 1, 1974.

Questions and Comments:  None

H.   Electric Vehicle  Impact Study for Los Angeles, by William  Hamilton,
     General Research  Corporation
This study,  although it focuses on the Los Angeles  region, includes  national
implications of regional electric car use.  Its ultimate concern  is  the com-
prehensive impacts  of  battery-electric car introduction  in a conventional-
automobile situation;  it does not address hybrid-electric, steam, or other  auto-
motive alternatives.  Impacts are sought on:  environment, resources,  economy,
and society in  1980, 1990 and 2000.
                                     -271-

-------
ENGINE/CATALYTIC GENERATOR
INTEGRATION TEST DATA
                          BASELINE DESIGN POINT
                           ENGINE AND CATALYTIC
                           H2 GENERATOR  PREDICTION
ENGINE ONLY
                                         UNMODIFIED
                                         ENGINE
                           EARLY THERMAL
                           GENERATOR/ENGINE
                           INTEGRATION TEST DATA
                       EARLY THERMAL
                       GENERATOR/ENGINE
                       PREDICTION
        0.4         0.6         0.8
          SYSTEM EQUIVALENCE RATIO
  Fig.  166  Engine/Hydrogen Generator Thermal Efficiency

-------
I
to
                                                                                                                                      v.
                                         Fig.  167   Bottled Gas Car Installation

-------
                               UNMODIFIED       BOTTLED        EPA 1977
                                 VEHICLE         GAS CAR       STANDARD


HYDROCARBONS (GM/Ml)             2.29            2.6            0.41

CARBON MONOXIDE (GM/Ml)          43.91            1.6            3.4

NITROGEN OXIDES (GM/MI)            1.75            0.52           0.4

FUEL BTU/Mll£*                     12,700            8400           J


     STATUS

         TUNING OF CONTROL SYSTEM CONTINUING FUTURE TESTS EXPECTED  TO
         SHOW  NOX BELOW STANDARD


• TOTAL GASOLINE AND HYDROGEN  BTU's
                     Fig. 168   Bottled Gas Car Test Results

-------
The basis for impact calculation is a characterization of  electric  cars  per-
formed under subcontract by Minicars, Inc., of Santa Barbara,  California.
Figure 169 shows parametric vehicle gross weights  for a  small  shopping car
and for a larger car with freeway commuting capability,  together with  specific
range—weight combinations selected for subsequent use in  the  study.   Ranges
shown were evaluated on the SAE Residential and Metropolitan Area Driving
Cycles, respectively.  Maximum ranges at constant  speed  are over twice the
figures shown.  Figure 170 shows the performance of the  batteries assumed  for
these 1980 calculations, together with performance of several  advanced lead-
acid traction batteries which have already been operated in experimental
electric cars.  Also shown is the performance of a lithium-sulfur battery
which current development programs are expected to make  available by 1990;
its superior performance essentially removes electric car  range  restrictions
forecast for 1980.   As Fig. 171 suggests, even the 4-passenger vehicle is
quite small, in the subcompact class; but adequate weight  and  space allowances
arc provided for compliance with future safety standards.

The impact of electric cars is measured relative  to a future without electric
cars.  This future has been defined through the series of  baselin?  projec-
tions:  population, transportation, energy, economy and  air quality.   The
ground rule in all these baseline projections has  been "no surprises", that
is, no drastic rationing of gasoline or electricity, nor other major disloca-
tion of existing economic, social, and technological patterns.  The baseline
projections collectively envision much-reduced rates of  population  growth  in
Los Angeles, a very moderate expansion of transportation demand  and the  free-
way system, a reduced but still substantial growth in the  supply and demand
for electric power, and a major improvement in air quality due to enforcement
of existing automobile emission regulations.

Figure 172 shows an important product of the baseline energy projection:
future fuel economy of the average automobile.  The chart  includes  both  the
actual fuel economy over the past 40 years for all cars  on the road and  the
measured economy for average new cars since 1957.  Circles for future  years
are legislative and research goals and standards  advanced  during the  past  year.
                                    -275-

-------
 6000 r
  5000
54000
 %
h
I
o
uj
53000
  2000
                                          4-PASSENGER
                                         2-PASSENGER
     oL
      0
20
40       60

 RANGE, mi
80
                                                 100
          Fig.  169   Electric Car Weight Versus Range 1980
                         -276-

-------
1000
                  LITHIUM-SULFUR
  100
1
   10
   1980
FORECAST
1990 FORECAST
                          I  M Mill    I   I M Mill
                   10            100
                      watt hr/lb
                                      1000
            Fig. 170  Battery Characteristics
                       -277-

-------
   FOUR PASSENGER VEHICLE CONFIGURATION
i
ts>
OO
I
                                         Fig.  171    Four Passenger Vehicle Configuration

-------
o
a.
O
z
O
_J
u
D
u.
   25
   20
   15
   10
              I
0
1930    1940
I
                     1950    1960    1970

                                 YEAR
I
       1980    1990    2000
                 Fig.  172  Projected Auto Fuel Economy
                              -279-

-------
The baseline projection, which calls for a doubling of gasoline mileage by
the end of the century, is based primarily on a near-term target cited by the
EPA and a 1984 goal stated in legislation passed by the Senate six months ago.

Figure 173 compares the baseline fuel economy projection with prospects for
electric cars.  Here energy consumption has been transformed into fuel BTU
                                  *
consumed, either in the ICE automobile or in the power plant supplying recharge
electricity.  Points are shown in Fig. 173 for both 2- and 4-passenger electric
cars; even the 4-passenger cars promise to remain as economical as the rapidly-
improving baseline ICE car.  In fairness, however, it must be noted that the
baseline ICE car will provide more performance and accomodations than the
4-passenger electrics.  In these respects the electrics are comparable to such
subcompacts as today's Pinto—which is already more energy efficient than the
1980 electric counterpart is likely to be.

The energy baseline projection also investigated prospective availability of
recharge power.  Supply and demand were forecasted for peak days of future
years, as illustrated for 1990 in Fig. 174.  The shaded area of this chart
shows capacity available, after reasonable allowances for maintenance, for
overnight recharge of electric cars.  By the year 2000, this available capa-
city will be adequate for electrification of all Los Angeles automobiles.
It will generally be obtainable by activating oil-fired plants in the Los
Angeles Air Basin, which will then be relegated to peaking service so that
base loads may be met by cleaner, cheaper energy sources.

Baseline forecasts of NOx emissions in the Los Angeles region are shown in
Fig. 175.  Given emission controls now in prospect, they will drop signifi-
cantly by 1990, while the automotive share drops even more dramatically.  As
Fig. 176 shows, automotive hydrocarbon emissions will similarly be reduced in
future years to a. very low relative and absolute level, as will CO emissions
shown in Fig. 177.  Even without electric cars, then, Los Angeles air quality
is headed for a major improvement.  Equally important, it will become rela-
tively independent of future vehicular emissions.  In this sort of future,
electric cars can only produce relatively modest further improvement.  A
                                     -280-

-------
 12,000 r
 10.000,
LLI
  8000
£ 6000
Q.
ID
I-
00 4000
UJ
  2000
      0
     AVERAGE NEW 1C CAR
     V
  LEAD-ACID^.
BATTERY CARS"
 *PINTO?
 »     D
  HONDA
        I
^LITHIUM-SULFUR
  BATTERY CARS
0
     1970
      1980     1990
          YEAR
        2000
       Fig. 173  Comparative Energy Consumption
                  -281-

-------
100%r
 75%
 500/-
      * •-"*" * "' • "•* '
    /o
 25%
    0
 MIDNIGHT   6AM
                         COAL AND GAS
   NUCLEAR
  I
                              HYDRO
NOON
6PM    MIDNIGHT
    Fig. 174  Hourly Electricity Demand smd Supply - Aug 1990
                        -282-

-------
CO
 o
Q


-------
LU
    1960   1970
 1980
YEAR
1990    2000
       Fig. 176   Baseline Emissions:  HC
                 -284-

-------
    10
CO
 o
 -   8
 x
 CC
 LU
 Q_
 CO
  . 4
 CO
 CO
 LLJ
    0
    1960
                     I
                     J
1970
 1980
YEAR
1990     2000
           Fig. 177  Baseline Emissions: CO
                     -285-

-------
detailed  series  of  air pollution model runs has been completed for electric
cars;  its  results,  now being documented,  are not easily summarized because
they vary  from one  locale to another,  depending on powerplant emission
plumes.

Direct cost  impacts of electric car .use are illustrated in Fig. 178.  Electric
cars will  be initially more expensive  than their gasoline-fueled counterparts,
but will  last longer and will require  less maintenance.  Battery depreciation,
however,  leads to significantly higher total cost, at least until new battery
technology appears.   Figure 178 shows  ranges of costs for 1990 ICE automobiles
in 1973 dollars,  with gasoline price ranging from 50-80c per gallon, ap.d for
expected  average annual usage of 10,000 miles.  Because their limited range
qualifies  them primarily for use as second cars, the lead-acid electric cars
are likely to be driven only 6300 miles per year, at per-mile costs considerably
higher than  gasoline-fueled cars.  The range of costs shown results from the
range  of  uncertainty in cycle life of future batteries.

Until  advanced batteries arrive, the extra cost of electric car operation will
be among  the more important economic impacts.  There will also be a signifi-
cant shift in regional economic activity.  Substantial economic activity in
the South Coast  Air Basin will be affected by a shift from gasoline to electric
automobiles. Where activity expands,  or simply shifts to another kind of
merchandizing, the  impact is beneficial or moderate; but in gasoline sales,
which  electric cars will simply eliminate, significant adverse impacts arise.
Jobs thus  eliminated are particularly sensitive because they require few
skills and are thus among the already limited prospects for disadvantaged
groups.

Even when  restricted to second-car use, and to single-family dwellings with
off-street parking  so that overnight recharge is easily arranged, a million
Los Angeles  automobiles could be electric in 1980, with much larger numbers in
1990 and  2000 when  high-performance batteries make daily range adequate for
first-car  use in most households.
                                     -286-

-------
  30 r
  25
._ 20
§ 15
en
O
U
  10
LEAD ACID ELECTRIC
        1990 ICE
        AVERAGE
LITHIUM-SULFUR ELECTRIC
                    1990 ICE
                    SUBCOMPACT
   0
 I
    0    5000  10,000  15,000 20,000
          ANNUAL MILEAGE
                Fig. 178  Comparative Car Costs
                         -287-

-------
 The estimated number of electric cars  likely  to be  saleable  in  Los Angeles
 under current market conditions is shown as the lower curve  in  Fig.  179.
 "High" or "medium" use curves in this  chart presume public policies  and
 action" encouraging electric car use and/or discouraging  gasoline-fueled
 car use.  Gasoline, for example, might be  taxed sufficiently to eliminate
g the cost disadvantages of the electric cars,  or a purchase tax  on  ICE cars
 might be imposed to achieve the same overall  result.  Elimination  of the
 cost disadvantage for the lead-acid battery cars would  require  a gasoline tax
 of at least $1.70 per gallon or a purchase tax of $2400,  even given  the lower
 cost associated with the most optimistic battery cycle  life. The  impact of
 any such t&xes obviously becomes a major consideration  in the overall cost
 and benefit assessment for electric cars.

 The impact study has recently been expanded to include  several  intermediate
 performance batteries.  Once parametric  impacts have beer, developed  for
 cars using these batteries, overall cost-benefit ledgers  and assessments of
 the most desirable level of electric car use  will be completed.  The project
 is now  to be concluded in October.

 Questions and Comments
 Question:  Referring to Fig. 174,  the  oil  fired peaking power is usually the
     most expensive and least efficient  power generated.   Is this  the elec-
     tricity which is contemplated for recharging the electric  car batteries?
 Answer:  It is assumed that ways will  be found to get new, more efficient
     power plants on-line.  But there  are  major conflicts in the Los Angeles
     area between power companies and  the  environmentalists. Agencies  require
     10 and 20 year forecasts from the utilities; if new plants are  not
     permitted, then shortages and compromises can  be expected.

 Question (J. Appeldoorn, Esso Research):   In  Fig. 173,  is this  on-board
     BTU/mi?  If not, the battery powered  car consumption should be  multi-
     plied by 2% to take into account  the  efficiency of the  power  plant and
     if peaking power is used, the factor  should be 5.
                                     -288-

-------
                                                                UPPER BOUND
i
to
00
v£>
I
         CO
         cc
         <
         O
            0
MEDIUM USE POLICY
                                                  HIGH USE POLICY
                                                            FREE MARKET
                        1980
            2000
                             Fig. 179  Electric Car Population Projections

-------
Answer:   The PTU's plotted are the BTU's in the fuel burned at the power
     plant.   Power plant and electric power distribution efficiencies are
     taken Into consideration.  Projections are for more efficient plants
     and not the jet engine-type peaking plants which are less efficient.
Comment.  (Dr. A. R. Landgrebe, AEC):  It was pointed out that the August load
     curve (Ref. Fig. 173) is the worst month of the year for Los Angeles;
     more base load power would be available at other times of the year.  It
     is  believed that the advanced batteries will be available by the early
     1980's; not 1990"s.  An AEC study shows that an electric car with energy
     from a reactor would be twice as efficient as a car driven with synthetic
     fuels.
Comment  (Art Underwood, Consultant):  Personal experience with golf carts
     has shown that practical maintenance on current electric vehicles is
     about three times  that of a Cadillac from the consumer's viewpoint.
     The nuisance of inspecting and watering numerous cells and failure of
     relays were mentioned.
Answer:   More advanced  electric vehicles will avoid relay reliability problems
     with solid state control elements.  A number of new developments like
     sealed lead-acid batteries should avoid or minimise watering incon-
     venience.
Comment (Dr. J. Salihi, Otis Elevator Company):  The market for golf carts
     is  continuiug to grow.

Question (S. Snyder, Ford Motor Company):  The study is evolving to the
     practical and economic factors necessary to reach conclusions.  One of
     the key questions  is what is  the cost of ownership of an electric vehir <;
     on a fully comparable basis?  If an electric vehicle is slightly more
     expensive, what is the packageability and performance?  The American
     customer is extremely sensitive to these two factors.  The electric car
     is  heavy and less  roomy due to space used by batteries.
Answer:   Although difficult to predict, it is expected that the electric
     vehicle will indeed be significantly more expensive  to operate (more
     than 10%).  With the VW equaling sales of the Pinto at half the horse-
                                     -290-

-------
     power per ton and performance about equal to that of the electric,  it
     is hard to say performance rules out the electric.  Alco recent surveys
     of customers are showing increasing concern for fuel economy and reli-
     ability and other factors.  These are easier for the electric to achieve.

Question (Carl Thonas, Institute for Energy Analysis):  Are you or any group
     you are aware of looking at a hybrid-flywheel battery system with regen-
     erative brakins capability?
Answer:  This is not being actively considered by EPA at this time, but there
     is the possibility of re-considering such systems in FY 1975.

Question (Cmdr. E. Tyrrel, Dept of Trade and Industry, England):  What about
     the availability and price of such materials as lead, lithium, and sulfur?
     Has this been taken into consideration?
Answer;  These and other materials have been investigated on the economic-
     availability basis.   Because this study only concerns Los Angeles at
     present, the quantities for that area are not significant on a. national
     basis.  However, the national implications will be covered in more depth
     in the final report.

Question:  There is considerable question about the applicability of the car
     usage survey data from the Los Angeles transportation survey.  Selected
     sampling of a few individuals indicates that quite often the second err
     in a family is used for long trips as well as the first car.  Also, it
     is often used simultaneously for long trips by other members of the family.
Answer:  All of the potentially useful data from the Los Angeles transportation
     survey was not dug out.  The time and money for further effort on this
     data were not available.  Its shortcomings and limitations are recognized.

Question (M.  Laurente, Department of Transportation):  What is the cause for
     increasing cost of the lead-acid batteries (Fig. 178)?
Answer:  Life estimates for lead-acid batteries vary by a factor of 3:1.
     Annual replacement of the battery was assumed.  A replacement night cost
     as much as $1000.  More reliable data on life cycle costs are needed for
     this application.  Even less is known about lithiun-sulfur batteries.
                                     -291-

-------
Question  (Petro-Electric):  Can you say anything about Pctro-Electric hybrid
     engine  now on test?
Answer:   Petro-Electric has a vehicle under test at EPA.  It is a hybrid heat
     engine  (Wankel) - lead-acid battery, d c motor driven vehicle.  No other
     information is presently available.

 I.   New  EPA Highway Fuel Economy Test Cycle, by C. D. Paulsell. EPA. Emission
     Control Technology Division, Procedures Development Branch
 Th~ EPA has  for several years recognized that the  light duty vehicle emission
 certification procedure provides reliable, reproducible information which can
 be utilized  for calculation of vehicle fuel economy*.  The certification test
 procedure incorporates a chassis dynamometer that  exercises the test vehicle
 to simulate  the power required of the vehicle during an urban drive in a major
 metropolitan area   .  The carbon mass emissions from these tests can be used
 to calculate the average urban fuel economy; this  calculation equally applies
 to all the. vehicle  types  tested during  the certification process and permits
 the effect of vehicle design parameters  on urban fuel economy to be assessed.
 Publication of chase urban fuel economy  data for all classes of vehicles pro-
 vides the consumer  with one piece of  information he can include as a criterion
 for determining the suitability of any  given vehicle for filling his needs.
 Tte fact that more  than half of the  total vehicle  miles accumulated are
 traveled in urban areas reflects  the  importance of knowing urban fuel economy.

 The average vehicle owner tends  to  ignore urban  ("aroung town")  fuel economy
 because  it  is usually  less than highway fuel economy and because highway fuel
 economy  is nsore conveniently measured.   Thus,  the  typical vehicle  owner has
 conditioned himself to expect  fuel  economy data  to refer to highway  type
 *  A Report on Automotive Fuel Economy,  U.S.  Environmental  Protection  Agency,
   Office of Air and  Water Programs,  Mobile Source Air Pollution Control,
   October 1973.
 ** Development of  the Federal Urban Driving Schedule,  Society of Automotive
   Engineers. Paper No.  730553.
                                      -292-

-------
operations  and the publication of urban fuel economy data does not provide
the information relative to his personal experience.  Highway cravel accounts
for more  than 40% of the total vehicle miles traveled making highway fuel
economy a useful and valid criterion for judging vehicle performance.  An
appropriate dynamometer vehicle exercise which simulates typical highway
operation could also bo employed to measure highway fuel economy data.  Pub-
lication  of both equally valid fuel economy rates would be useful information
for many  individuals.

Thus, the purpose of this program was to measure road speed versus time pro-
files of  vehicle operation on all types "f highways and non-urban roads and
to reduce these profiles to character!:: _ie parameters which could be used to
develop a composite driving cycle.  This driving cycle could then be used to
measure vehicle fuel econony under typical highway operation as simulated on
a chassis dynamometer.

Through a very careful procedure of taking and analyzing road test data with
several vehicles (described in detail in Appendix C) a composite Highway
Driving Cycle was developed as shown both graphically in Fig. 180 and  in
tabular form in Fig. 181.
                                     -293-

-------
                               •!•.!•••;"•!'':;! f:i.T.!.r|.:;.i.i.:j.f.|:;.-
»:N«
Thmttfr
i.h:T-
END
                                                                                                                START
                                   Fig.  180   Composite  Highway Driving Trace

-------
V/l
I
Segment
Lenght
(IN)
( 0.13)
9.5 ( 9.60)
11.5 11.53)
17.0 17.00)
12.5 12.60
0.13)
50.5 (51.0 )
Inches
Segment
(Idle)
D
C
A
B
(Idle)
Overall
Total
Average
Speed
(HPH)
( 0.0 )
41.157 (40.736)
43.041 (43.C35)
56.096 (56.110)
48.421 (48.230)
( 0.0 )
48.595 (48.200)
MPH
Distance
Traveled
(Miles)
( o.o ]
1.629 ( 1.629
2.101 ( 2.107
3.973 ( 3.9741
2.522 ( 2.532
( 0.0 ]
Elapsed
Time
(MIN) (SEC)
2
2.375 144
2.8/5 173
4.250 255
3.125 189
2
10.225 (10.242) 12.625 765
Miles ' Minutes Seconds
% Total
Miles
( 0.0 )
15.93 ( 15.91]
20.55 ( 20.57
38.85 ( 38. 80'
24.67 ( 24.72;
( o.o )
100.0% (100.055)
                                                                                        (12.750)
           NOTE:   Previous overall average speed did not Include 4 second idle period.
                              Fig.  181   Characteristics  of Composite Highway Driving Cycle*


                                          Values  applicable to the sr^nded version
                                          (Mon. April 22, 1974) are shown in parentheses.

-------
           APPENDIX A

   ORIENTATION OF ALTERNATIVE
AUTOMOTIVE POWER SYSTEMS DIVISION
       IN EPA ORGANIZATION

-------
                                APPENDIX A

ORIENTATION OF ALTERNATIVE AUTOMOTIVE POWER SYSTEMS DIVISION IN EPA ORGANIZATION

The EPA  organization has  five Assistant Administrators reporting to the
Administrator, Russell Train:  (1) Planning.and Management,  (2) Enforcement,
(3) Water  and Hazardous Materials, (4) Research and Development, and (5)  Air
and Waste  Management.  AAPS  reports through Roger Strelow, Assistant Administra-
tor for  Air and Waste Management.   Air and  Waste Management, in turn, is
comprised  of  five (5) offices as shown in Fig. A-l.

AAPS Division is  part of  the Office of Mobile Source Air Pollution Control under
Deputy Assistant  Administrator, Eric Stork, in Washington, D.C.  Mr. Stork has
four major functions, all located in Ann Arbor, Michigan.  As shown in Fig. A-2
the AAPS Division is one  of these functions.
                                       A-l

-------
>
ISJ
                                                                 Figulre A-l

-------
>
Ui
                                                           Figure A-2

-------
             APPENDIX B





LIST OF ATTENDEES AND REPRESENTATIVES

-------
                             APPENDIX B

               LIST OF ATTENDEES AND REPRESENTATIVES


                            Consultants
Altman,  Peter

Bachle,  Carl

Di eke rs on,  Do rman

Gay, Errol J.

Harmon,  Rob e rt

Huber, Paul
Mills, Ken D.

Percival, Worth
Roensch, Max M.
Siegan, Bruce

Underwood, Art

Way, Gilbert
                     U. S. Government Agencies
ARMY MATERIALS & MECHANICS RESEARCH CENTER


ARMY MOBILITY EQUIPMENT R&D CENTER

ARMY TANK AUTOMOTIVE COMMAND
AfOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION


BROOKHAVEN NATIONAL  LAB



BUREAU OF MINES

DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT - CANADA

DEPARTMENT OF TRADE & INDUSTRY - ENGLAND
Lenoa, E. M.
Messier, Donald

Belt, Richard

Checklich, George
Engle, Gene
Jessel, Alfred
Machala, Paul
Petrick, Dr. Ernest
Raggio, David G.
Rambia, Edward
Santo, H.
Scully, Andrew
Tripp, David
Whitcomb, William
Woodward, Rqbert

Landgrebe, Dr. Albert R.
Stewart, Walter

Hoffman, Ken
Reilly, J. J.
Waide, Charles

Hurn, R. W.

Reid, R.

Tyrrel, Commander E.
                                   B-l

-------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - WASHINGTON, D.C.
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
ENVIRONMETITAL PROTECTION AGEKCY - ANN ARBOR
 FEDERAL ENERGY OFFICE - WASHINGTON, D.C.

 GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION

 INSTITUE DE RECHERCHE DES TRANSPORTS,  FRANCE

 INSTITUTE FOR DEFENSE ANALYSIS


 JET PROPULSION LAB
Compton, Roger
Fay, David
Hirsh, Dan
Husted, Robert
Laureate, Michael
Miller, Harold
Raithel, Wilhelm

Johnson, James
Kittredge, George
McSarley, J. A.
Tate, Bill

Barber, Kenneth
Brogan, John
Cain, William
Ecklund, Gene
Hagey, Graham
Hopkins, Howard
Hutchins, Peter
Kaykaty, Gabriel
Kenney, Dyer
Kramer, Saunders B.
Luchter, Stephen
Mirsky, Williara
Murrell, Dill
Naser, Howard
Paulsell, Don
Schulz, Robert
Sebestyen, Tom
Sutton, Pat
Szczepaniack, Ed
Thur, George

Thomson, Dr. Robb

Ullrich, Robert

Pierre, Dreyer

Hamilton, Robert C.
Rlddiel, F. R.

Barber, Thomas
Breshears,  R.
Laumann, G.
Meisenholder, G. W.
Moore, Nick
Phen, Robert
Raymond, R.
Riebling, Robert
Spiegel, Joe
Stephenson, R.  Rhoads
                                   B-2

-------
LOS ALAMOS SCIENTIFIC LABORATORY

NAVAL ENGINEERING CENTER

NASA, HEADQUARTERS


NASA, LEWIS RESEARCH CENTER
SANDIA LABORATORIES
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Stewart, Walter

Byrnes, William F.

Johnson, Paul
Van Landingham, Earl E.

Butze, Fritz
Heller, Jack
Packe, Dan
Stone, Phil
Wong, Robert
Wood, James

Blackwell, Arlyn, N.
Hartley, Danny
Jones, M. 0.

Gerlach, Lewis
                                Press
AUTOMOTIVE NFWS

CHILTON BUSINESS PUBLICATIONS

GAS TURBINE PUBLICATIONS

MC GRAW-HILL PUBLISHERS

PRODUCTION MAGAZINE

STEAM AUTOMOBILE CLUB

UNITED PRESS INTERNATIONAL

WALL STREET JOURNAL
Rowland, Roger

Eshelman, Ralph

Farmer, Robert

Hampton, William

Hopkins, Charles

Lyon, Robert

Lechtzin, Edward

Condacci, Greg
                                   B-3

-------
         Industrial. Educational and Research Organizations
ADVANCED MATERIALS ENGINEERING LTD., ENGLAND


ADVANCED POWER SYSTEMS


AEROJET LIQUID ROCKET CO.


AEROSPACE CORPORATION


AIRESEARCH MFG. CO.


ALLIED CHEMICAL

AMERICAN AIRLINES

AMERICAN HONDA

AMERICAN MOTORS




ARTHUR D. LITTLE INC.

ATLANTIC RICHFIELD


AUTOMOTIVE RESEARCH ASSOCIATES

AVCO

BATTELLE MEMORIAL INSTITUTE

BATTELLE PACIFIC NORTHWEST

BENDIX CORPORATION



BORG WARNER CORPORATION


ROBERT BOSCH CORP.

WM. BROBECK AND ASSOC.
Egenolf, J.
Hryniszak, Dr. W.

Carpenter, Scott
Wyle, Steve

Jones, Roy
Rudnicki, Mark

Lapedes» Don
Meltzer, Dr. Joe

Castor, Jere
Lewis, Leon

Allen, Robert

Porter, G. R.

Amito, Eiji

Burke, Carl
Green, Raymond
Jones, W.
Porter, G. R.

Hurter, Donald

Lease, C. A.
Mrstik, A. V.

Bungh, Howard M.

Paulov.Li_i, R.

Hazard, Herb

Loscutoff, Walter

Datwyler, Walter
Mayer, Endre
McGlinn,  E. J.

Hallberg,  Irving
Mercure,  Robert

Denneler,  Kurt

Brobeck,  W. M.
Younger,  Francis
                                  B-4

-------
CALSPAN CORPORATION

CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY



JAY C VRTER ENTERPRISES


CATERPILLAR TRACTOR'CO.


CELANESE CHEMICAL CO.

CHAMPION SPARK PLUG

CHANDLER EVANS

CHEVRON RESEARCH

CHRYSLER CORPORATION
Davis, James

Macken, Dr.  Nelson
Negeanu, M.
Paul, Dr. Frank

Carter, Jay  Jr.
Kuykendall,  Hugh

Billington,  L.  J.
Kline, Jan C.

Baker, Norman

Lentz, L. R.

Riordan, Mike

Guldrman, R. A.

Alexander, Bert
Angell, Peter
Ball, G. A.
Callison, Janes C.
Cogswell, Dewane
Collister, Howard
Dudash, Jim
Franceschina, J.
Goiec, Thomas
Gross, Jerome
Hagen, F. A.
Huebner, George
Koontz, H. E.
LeFevre, H.  P.
Levakcvski,  J.  J.
Mann, L. B.
Martin, F.
McGuire, Larry
McNulty, William
Miklos, A. A.
Nogle, Tom
Otto, A. K.
Pamperin, R. C.
Power, W.
Roy, A.
Samples, Doran K.
Schmidt  Fred
Scobel,  Ken
Sparks,  N. W.
Stecher, George
Steivien, Bill
Stoyack, Joseph
Sumaer,  J.  I.
Valeri,  Ross
Wagner,  Cauck
Willson, ?. J.
                                  B-5

-------
CLIMAX MOLYBDENEUM


CORNING GLASS WORKS



CUMMINS ENGINE CO.

D CYCLE POWER SYSTEMS

DANA CORPORATION

JOHN DEERE

DUPONT


EATON CORP.
 ESCHER TECHNOLOGY


 ESSO RESEARCH




 ETHYL CORPORATION



 EXCELLO

 EXXON CHEMICAL

 FEDERAL MOGUL


 FORD MOTOR COMPANY
Morrow, Hugh
Spenseller, D. L.

Lanning, John
McBeath, C.
Wardale, David

Mather, K. J.

Davoud, Dr. J. E.

Charlesworth, W.

Stewart, Tom H.

Green, Karl F.
Van Burskirk, 0. R.

Chute, Richard
Confair, I.es
Danis, L. J.
Eltinge, Dr. L.
Mueller, Bob
Richardson, Robert
Saeters, R. A.

Escher, William
Tison, Roy

Appledoorn, John
Furlong, L. E.
Kant,  F.
Salvesfen, R. H.

Clark, Gill
Sneed, Richard B.
Zeitz, A.  H.  Jr.

Weldy,  R.  K.

Pennekamp, E.  F. H.

Castledine, W.
Probst, Robert

Auiler, J.  E..
 Bates, Bradford
Blumberg,  Paul
Chapman,  W.  I.
Daby, Eric
 Davis, D.  A.
 Fisher,  E. A.
 Fuciniari, C. A.
                                   B-6

-------
FORD MOTOR COMPANY
 (cont.)
FOSECO INC.


FRANKLIN INSTITUTE

GARRETT CORPORATION



GENERAL ELECTRIC




GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION
GENERAL MOTORS DETROIT DIESEL
GENERAL MOTORS TECHNICAL CENTER
Cratch, Serge
Havsted, P. H.
Howes, B.
Laurance, Neal
Macauley, William
Marshall, A. E.
Mason, F. J.
McLean, A.
Mumford, Jack
Paluszny, A.
Peitsch, G.
Peters, Norman
Philips, C. W.
Rahnke, C.
Rossi, L. R.
Secord, John
Snyder, S. F.
Stadler, H.
Stockton, Thomas R.
Swatman, Ivan
Wade, W.

Hawthorne, P.
Rice, Ron

Rauch, Burton

Bartlett, Parker
Flinn, Donald E.
Miliacca, Lee

Bond, Jim
Dutram, Leonard
Frank, R. G.
Keister, J. E.

Bly, K. B.
Casey, Gary L.
Colucci, Joseph M.
Fleming, J. D.
Stebar, R. F.

Baugh, E.
Mayo, George
Sullivan, Robert

Agnew, W. G.
Amarm, Charles
Bell, Albert H.
Ghana, Howard
Collman, John
Cornelius, Walter
Dimick, David
Feiten, James B.
                                  B-7

-------
GENERAL MOTORS TECHNICAL CENTER
 (cont.)
GENERAL OPTIONICS

GENERAL RESEARCH

GTE-SYLVANIA


HOLLY CARBURETOR


HORST POWER SYSTEMS


HOWMET


INSTITUTE FOR ENERGY ANALYSIS

INSTITUTE OF GAS TECHNOLOGY



INTERNATIONAL HARVESTER

INTERNATIONAL NICKEL COMPANY


INTERNATIONAL RESEARCH & TECHNOLOGY

ISUZU MOTORS

KELSEY-HAYES
Frederickson, Hans
Hammond, D. C.
Hanley, George
Hartman, Dr. J. L.
Heffner, Earl
Hletbrink, Earl
Huellmantel, L. W.
Kutchey, J. A.
Malik, M. J.
Mathews, Charles
Mitchell, Harry
Niepoth, George
Nordenson, G. E.
Skellenger, G.
Stettler, R.
Vickers, Paul
Whorf, R. P.

Elythe, Richard

Hamilton, William

Corcoran, Richard
Kleiner, R.

Brantman, Leon
McCabe, Pat

Horst, Tom E.
Kelly, George

Boyle, Jim
Higgins, Mike

Thomas, Carl 0.

Fore, James G.
Gillis, Jay
Pangborn, Dr. John

Been, N. G.

Billin, R. M.
Tuffnell, Glenn W.

Jones, T.

Tsukagawa, Satoru

Adler, Irving
Havel, C. J.
Miles, Thomas E.
                                 B-8

-------
ROBERT KEYES & ASSOC.

KLOECKNER-HUMBOLDT-DEUTZ/GERMANY

LEYLAND MOTORS

LOCKHEED

LUBRIZOL CORPORATION



MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY

MECHANICAL TECHNOLOGY  INCORPORATED



MERCEDES BENZ

MINER MACHINE DEVELOPMENT CO.

MITRE CORPORATION

MITSUBISHI MOTOR CO.,  JAPAN
MOBIL RESEARCH  & DEVELOPMENT


MONSANTO CORP.


MOTOROLA




R. D. MUELLER & ASSOC.


NISSAN MOTOR CO.

JOSEPH LUCAS  NORTH AMERICA,  INC.


NORTH AMERICAN  PHILLIPS


NORTH AMERICAN  ROCKWELL-ROCKETDYNE
Schweppe, Howard

Klllmann, I. G.

Barnard, Mark

Lawson, Jim

Fuchs, E. J.
Scher, R. W.
Sieloff, Frank

Linden, Lawrence

Decker, Otto
Raber, R. A.
Sternlicht, Dr. Beno

Diefenbacher, Eberhard

Miner, S. S.

Stone, John

Ishimaru, Y.
Okazaki, Y.
Saito, Y.
Takaishi, Takeo
Takebe, T.

Crosthwait, Richard E.
Perry, R. H.

Miller, Dr. David
Winslow, Frank

Copeland, John
Lace, Mel
Mathey, Charles
Ronci, Bill

Parker, Andrew
Shadis, William

Saito, T.

Burgess, Anthony
Mandell, John

Loeffler, Larry
Lynch, Brian

Bremer,  George
Combs, Paul
                                  B-9

-------
NORTON COMPANY

OAKLAND UNIVERSITY

ONAN CORPORATION


ORSHANSKY TRANSMISSION

OTIS ELEVATOR

OWENS-ILLINOIS
NOEL PENNY TURBINES


PHILIPS PETROLEUM CO.

RAY POTTER & ASSOCIATES

POWER DYNETICS

PRATT WHITNEY AIRCRAFT



QUEST D CYCLE POWER

RICABDO CONSULTING  ENGINEERS,  ENGLAND

ROHR CORP.

ROLLS ROYCE MOTOR LTD.

C. G. A.  ROSEN

SAAB SCANIA


SCIENTIFIC ENERGY SYSTEMS,  INC.
 SHELL OIL COMPANY
Houck, E. W.

Blythe, James

Drury, E. A.
Lehmann, W. J.

Huntley, P.

Sallhi, Dr. Jalel

Brock, T. W.
Gray, Marion
Kormanyos, Ken R.
Pel, Y. K.
Woulbroun, J. M.

Noble, Dr. David
Silverstone, Dr. C. E.

Schirmer, Robert M.

Potter, Ray

Wood, Homer

Allen, Marvin
Billman, Lou
Wagner, W. Barry

Wildman, William

Palmer, Mike

Edwards, Jack

Williams, T.

Harshum, James A.

Koch, Berhl
Palm, Bengt

Blake, D. 0.
Dernier,  Roger
Friedman, Tizhak
Hoagland, Dr. Lawrence
Syniuta, Walter
Vernon,  Jack

Abbin, Joseph Jr.
Burscain,  I.  G.
Curtis,  J. R.
Hendrickson,  C. H.
Yatsko,  Edward
                                  B-10

-------
SOLAR, DIVISION OF INTERNATIONAL HARVESTER


SUN COAST RESEARCH

SUN OIL COMPANY

SUNDSTRAND AVIATION


TECTONICS RESEARCH

TELEDYNE CONTINENTAL MOTORS



TEXACO, INC.

THERMO ELECTRON CORPORATION




THERMO MECHANICAL SYSTEMS

TOYO KOGYO LTD.

TOYOTA MOTOR CO.



TRACOR INC.


TRW

ULTRA ELECTRONICS


UNITED AIRCRAFT OF CANADA

UNITED AIRCRAFT RESEARCH LAB

UNITED PRESS INTERNATIONAL

UNITED STIRLING

UNITED TURBINE



UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA
Duffy, T. E.
White, David

Loomis, W. Warren

Toulmin, H. A.

Adam, A. Warren
Niggemann, Richard

Braun, A. T.

Blackburne, E.
Karaba, Al
Marks, D.

Hopkins, Stephen

Armstrong, Jack
Doyle, Ed
Patel, Parimal
Witzel, Walter

Yano, Robert

Yamate, Noriaki

Kinoshlta, Takahiko
Nakamura, Kenya
Takagi, Hldemasa

Gres, M. E.
Kraus, James

Richardson, Neal

Court, D. J.
Dent, John

Stoten, Mike

Greenwald, Larry

Lechtzin, Ed

Ortegren, Lars

Haggblad, H.
Kronogard, S. 0.
Malmrup,  Lars

Sawyer, Prof. Robert
                                  B-ll

-------
UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN
UNIVERSITY OF RHODE ISLAND

UNIVERSITY OF UTAH

UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

VOLKSWAGON


WALLIS MOTOR RES.

WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY

WESTINGHOUSE

WHITE MOTOR CO.

XAMAG, INC.
Anderson, Dr. R.  W.
Bolt, Prof. Jay
Lady, Edward R.
Nichols, Prof. J. Arthur
Yang, Dr. Wen

Brown, Dr. G. A.

Zenger, Jerry

Myers, Phil

Bucheim, Rolf
Walzer, Dr. Peter

Wallis, Marvin E.

Singh, Dr. T.

Johnson, R. H.

Simpson, F. 0. M.

Bentele, Dr. Max
                                   B-12

-------
                      APPENDIX C





DEVELOPMENT OF THE EPA COMPOSITE HIGHWAY DRIVING  CYCLE

-------
                                 APPENDIX C
           DEVELOPMENT OF THE EPA COMPOSITE  HIGHWAY  DRIVING CYCLE

Highway Driving Characterization;  The Department of  Transportation segregates
road systems  into  either of  two  categories  on the basis of principal area
characteristics.   The two categories are urban and rural (highway), which are
differentiated because of functional differences in land use,road networks, and
travel characteristics*.   DOT experience indicates that this  differentiation in
characteristics occurs in places of 5,000 population.  Rural  (highway) road
networks  are adequate if place populations  are less than 5,000 and urban traffic
networks  are required if the place populations exceed 5,000.   In order to
characterize road  types within either category the Department of Transportation
has developed a "Functional Classification Concept" which classifies each high-
way, road, or street according to the principal service that  it renders.  This
system of classification develops a hierarchy of route types.  Lowest In the
hierarchy are the  local roads and streets,  where trips begin  and end.  These
trip ends are characterized by low speeds,  unlimited access,  and penetration
of neighborhoods.   At the top of the hierarchy are the arterials designed to
accommodate high volumes of through traffic.  Intermediate facilities or col-
lectors accommodate the necessary transition from local  roads and streets to
arterials.  Outside urban areas, the main road type  classifications are:

                       A.  Principal arterial system
                           a.  Interstate
                           b.  Other principal arterials
                       B.  Minor arterial system
                       C.  Collector
                           a.  Major collectors
                           b.  Minor collectors
                       D.  LocaJ system.

The development of rural systems classification starts  at  the  top  of  the hier-
archy and works down.  First the principal and minor arterial  systems are
developed on a statewide basis.  Then  the collector  nnd local  classifications are
developed on a more localized (county)  basis.
 *Part II of the 1972 National Highway Needs  Report,  House Document No.  92-266
                                       C-l

-------

-------
On the basis of the above classification scheme, the percent of total highway
vehicle ndles traveled has been calculated for each road type:

                                  TABLE C-vl
                                          Percent of highway vehicle
               Type of Highway            	miles traveled	
           A.  Principal arterials
           B.  Minor arterials
           C.  Collectors
           D.  Locals
Highway operation represents between 40 and 50% of total vehicle miles traveled,
a value which continually decreases as urbanization increases.  These percentages
are the basis for constructing a composite highway driving cycle to simulate all
types of highway operation.

For this study, five routes incorporating each road type to be traveled during
the characterization were selected by EPA personnel.   Figure  C-l  is  a map of tire
general area.  Figure  C-2  illustrates a  sample  route which was designed to cover a
variety of road types  for equipment check out tests.  On the  first run of this
route the data recording equipment functioned properly, but th« vehicle experi-
enced a fuel system failure.  The test equipment was transferred to the stand-by
vehicle and the replacement vehicle and equipment were checked out on the
dynamometer.  Since the equipment had functioned properly on  the sample route
and everything functioned well when checked on the dynamometer, the route
shown on Fig. C-3 was  run first.  This is primarily a type B  (minor arterial)
route with 61% type B  roads, 28% type A  (major arterial) roads and 112 type C
(collector) roads.  The second route, Fig. C-4, is a type A route with 100%
type A roads.  Figure  C-5  illustrates a  type  C  route with 44% type C roads,  227.
type D (local) roads,  17% type A roads and 17% type B  roads.  The fourth data
collection run was a. rerun of the sample route, Fig. C-2.  This route consists
of 47% type D roads, 43% type C roads and 10% of type A roa^s.  The  fifth route
was run on a freeway in Ohio subject to  55 MPH speed limits,  consists of 100%
type A roads (Fig. C-6).
                                       C-2

-------
o
I
                 ^   	  |            --  .•WO^T        ..  ov           . i

                   '~—s>!\*  :•  I   ©  L -..r---,-^1  .-f-Iii..^-'--.
                    '-.-.-^—-^.^.--^--^^-jr.r,,,,,,.»'^;,i7^-«-fr:.!.r  v,;tl''
                      	'•••'	•   •   " •   i——---.I       i      •  .1—  __
                                          Fig.  C-l   General Area Travelled

-------
M&CrAt- ,
                         Fig. C-2   Sample  Run  "D"  Route
                                            C-A

-------
                     ..'tfZ&w
                        *.>£>
          —*c—    •^   v-l-a
                                    TOLEDO

Fig. C-3   "B" Route-




        C-5

-------
                   tf^piii
                   •©"''"
                    k
                  =
-------
Fig. C-5   "C" Route
         C-7

-------
  Ann Arior'i.-^i- svvvv.
      •'  ^Offfrj^ix.JJ;
     • S f:*W^
        Wi   v
Fig. C-6  "A-55 MPH" Route


        C-8

-------
During this data collection process, 460 feet of chart were used, which at
4 inches of chart travel per minute represents about 23 hours of data, collected
over a total distance of about 1050 miles.  During all travel, an observer
accompanied the driver to make notes about the trip and to log pertinent data.

Vehicle Instrumentation;  The vehicle used to collect data in this program was
a 1971 Ford Ranchwarpn with a 429 CID-4V engine, 3 speed automatic transmission,
' ' •"                             • ,                           •' t
and a 2.75 ratio rear axle.  This vehicle had been previously instrumented for
a study of vehicle operation and driving profiles.  The instrumentation included
a manifold vacuum transducer, digital timer (seconds), a driveshaft torquemeter,
and driveshaft speed pickup.  The signals from the driveshaft were scaled and
recorded on a stripchart moving at a rate of 4 inches per minute to produce the
same time base as the federal urban driving cycle.  All of the instrumentation
was calibrated and checked on a chassis dynamometer to verify true speed and
torque readings.  The vehicle contained a static inverter power supply to pro-
vide 120 volt, 60 cps electricity.  This supply was used on all calibrations and
testing.

The true road speed was checked against the vehicle speedometer to permit a
quick calibration of the recorder on the road.  A panel meter which indicated
driveshaft speed also facilitated a third check on true speed and calibration
stability.  Calibration checks indicated good stability through the entire program.

The torquemeter had a shunt resistor which was used to calibrate the gain of the
torquemeter.  The torque readings were scaled to measure from -200 to +800
foot-pounds.  Torque readings were used to assess the variation in throttle
position for various velocity profiles.  No problems were incurred with this
measurement.

Data Verification and Analysis:  For ease of analysis, the 460 feet of recorder
chart gathered during this experiment were displayed on the walls of the office
hallway at the EPA Ann Arbor laboratory.  The charts were properly identified
according to route number and were reviewed and verified by the route observers.
There was one observer on each drive and three observers were used in the program.
These observers reviewed their own traces and verified comments.  They identified
                                      C-9

-------
route segments according to  type of road, A through D, determined which seg-
ments represented urban  (population above 5,000) driving and deleted the urban
segments.  Data reduction consisted of tabulating route speeds at 15 second
(I inch) intervals to determine the  maximum,  minimum and average segment speeds,
Total segment time, distance, number of stops, number of major speed deviations
per mile for each segment were calculated.  A speed deviation was defined as an
excursion greater than + 5 mph from a line, connecting end-point velocities on
six inch intervals (1.5 min) of the entire segment.

These data were compiled from all of the charts for each road type and the
average characteristics were determined for each road type.  These data are
presented in Table C-2.

                                   Table C-2
                        Average Highway Characteristics
Road Type
A
B
C
D
Composite
*Compos i te _
Speed
Average
Speed
MPH
57.16
49.42
45.80
39.78
49.43*

(.395/A +
Stops /mile
0.0100
0.0575
0.1260
0.2360
0.08
1
.224/B + .239/C +
Speed
Deviations/
mile
0.070
0.439
0.484
0.598
0,327
TA
.142/D ^A
on
                                                                (Also, see footnote
                                                                on Page C-l.)

Af-rer these road  type characteristics and  the composite highway trip charac-
teristics had been determined, a driving cycle selection committee was designated.
This committee was composed of the  three observers and three other EPA staff
engineers.  The committee  reviewed  the data, decided that a nominal 10 mile high-
way route would be optimum for laboratory  testing and agreed on a method for
obtaining the route.  The  committee split  into three groups of 2 persons each,
one observer and  one other engineer.  Each group was to select and combine the
appropriate lengths and  types of road segments to produce a route with character-
istics equivalent to the actual  composite  characteristics.   Each  group traced  tlie
selected sections of the actual speed versus time charts to corae up with the
                                     C-10

-------
composite route.  After  the  three  candidate  routes were  prepared, the committee
reconvened and evaluated the  relative merits  of each  route.  As might be
expected, the three  routes were quite comparable  with each  having special
features which that  group felt were  particularly  important.  After a thorough
analysis and discussion,  the  committee  constructed a  composite route which
contained the best features  of all three  routes.   Figure 181 (Section V-I) pre-
sents' the average characteristics  of the  composite route.  Figure 180 (Section V-I)
is a  photoreduction  of  the driving' chare  and represents  a graphical illus-
tration of the speed-time trace as read from right  to left,  because of the
direction of chart paper travel.
                                   Table C-3
Comparative Analysis of Cycle
Road Type
A
B
C
D
Composite
Average
Goal
57.16
49.42
45.80
39.78
49.43
Speed
Ac tua 1
56.10
48.42
43.84
41.16
43.59
Diff.
-1.06
-1.00
-1.96
+1.38
-0.84
Characteristics
% Miles
Goal
39.5
22.4
23.9
14.2
100. 0
Trave led
Ac tua 1
38.8
24.7
20.6
15.9
100.0
Diff.
-0.70
+2.30
-3.30
+1.70
0.00
Table C-3 compares  the  final  characteristics  of  the  Table  in Fig. 181 (Section
V-I) with the goals shown  in  Table  C-2.   It is readily apparent  that the highway
driving cycle closely approximates  the  real world  conditions.  All average speeds
are within + 2.0 MPH of the real world  average and the percentages of the distance
traveled in each segment are  within + 47. of the  DOT  values.

During the construction of this cycle,  the committee decided to  use actual
on-road traces to represent each segment.  This  decision placed  two restrictions
on the end points of the segments;  the  slopes and  speeds had to  be continuous
at the segment junctions.  Furthermore  the committee thought the most realistic
sequence of road segments  would be  DCAB.  The cycle  would  start  from an  idle,
contain four speed deviations (one  each in B  and D,  two in C) and end with a
deceleration to a stop  and idle.  For the convenience of the driver, who also
controls the CVS sampling, a  2 second idle period  was included at the beginning
and the end of the cycle.  The on-road  data indicated the  average idle time was
0.063 minutes/mile for  all road types traveled.
                                     C-ll

-------
Obviously, a  change in any of these criteria for one segment impacts on the
characteristics of the adjacent segments as well as the overall composite cycle
characteristics.

One general observation about the B and C segments should be made.  It was
sometimes difficult to distinguish whether a road was strictly a type B or type
C.  Since  their characteristics are very similar, a rigid distinction and duplica-
tion in the cycle was not considered critical.

The driving cycle shown in Fig.181 (Section V-I) was constructed from all of these
criteria and  is considered to be an accurate representation of all the types of
highway driving normally encountered.

The characteristics of this highway driving cycle were determined by tabulating
the velocities at each0.1 inch of  chart which represents  1.5 seconds.

This tabulation was converted  to a digital table which listed  the highway driving
cycle velocities for each of the 758 one second  intervals.  The trace was then
scaled to the sas^ chart papej- used for  the Federal Urban Cycle.  The tabulation..
is shown in Table  C-4.
                                     C-12

-------
                                                                  TABLE C-A
                                             EPA HIGHWAY FUEL ECONOMY DRIVING
                                                      SPEED (MPH) VS  TIME (SEC-)
SfcC

  0
  I

  3
  4
  S
  f»
  7
  9

 1C
 ; 1

 1J
 14
 IS

 17
     rfO
     21
o
 I
  .in

  .1?



  37
 -1
 .. ;*
 43

 -S

 -7
               ON
 1.0
 •1.0
 2.0

 i!l
11.J

17lj
i ;.»>

;•-. ,1
.*•».*
           11 .S

           3 •!'
           3S.H
           .15. J
3-.3

J->!l
I1'.7
3S.1
In. 2
3>>.S
In.7
 J.'.O
 37.0
 j7.;
 1 / .'.'
 37.0
 37.1
 .17. J
 37.t*
SfrC

 Srt

 *.,>
 S3
 S4

 Sh
 57
 Srt

 (•0
 - 1
           6S
           MS
            7.)
            71
            72
            73

            7-j
            76
            77
            7h

            -ft
            •1
                      "6
                      v J
                      S-.
                           V».J
                           •>•••• 0
                           -'.. J
                           4. .S
                           -.S.7
                           ,7.0
                           '•/.rf
                           ••7.1
       4r-,3
       4?,.-,
       -7.1
       -.7.4
       -7.7

       -1.2
                                     5ft:
4t.T

-.II

4'«. i

4 «. 0

4fll

-1-. '1


-•'.S




-'•.•*




WJ7
                                        •. 7.1
                                        -7.M
                        4r .0

                        -V.*
                        -7.J
 js.,1)
 J^.O

 Iv.'j
 -.'..I
                                            -.3.7
St-C
isn
is?
I'-n
ISM
t- n
                                                            •1Hn
                                                       '.7
                                                       71
                                                    71
                                                    7'.
                                                      177
                                                      I HI
                                                      1-1
                                                      1.-?
                                                      J-r-
                                                      r->7
                                                      !>•«

                                                      1-0
                                                                       itC

                                                                       200
/'Ob


2!)-*

ell
                                                                      /• Jb
                                                            -•j.7
                                                            -S.O
                                                            -.«•. 1
                                                         4 j.n

                                                         -j.u
                                                         - 1.1
                                                                      ft*
                                                                   i£.
                                                  i 1*
                                                  e H
                                                  t.ta

                                                  ,-t.U
                 i44

                 ito
                                                                             -3.U
                                                                             43.0
                                                                             41.
                                                                             41,•>
                                                                             4.1.7
                                                                   -•J. J
                                                                   4| .U
                                                      1-.7
                                                         — .J

                                                         -j!i

                                                         -5.B
                       4/.d
                       -7.4
                       <.7.J
                       47.J

                       -/!<:
                       47. f

                       47JU
                       -7.U

                       -*>.M
                                 47.3
                                 47.V
                                 48.0
                                                                           CYCLE


                                                                             StC

                                                                             250
                                            27-

                                            27o
                                            277
                                            27d
                                            27V
                                            290
                                            2nl
                                            2a2
                                                                                       2-0
                                                                                       dtt
MPH
4B.O
«t.O
4H.O
46.1
-d.2
48.2
4B.1
4d.6
4H.V
49.1
"4.1
*y. 1
-9.1
-9.1
4V. 0
48.9
4P.2
-7.7
-7.5
47.2
-h.7
46.2
4*1.0
-5.H
45.0
-S.4
-5.2
-S.O
-4.7
4-.S
-4.2
43. S
-2.0
-?.o
H.O. 1
3£«6
37.5
35. H
J4.7
J-.O
J3.3
32. a
J1.7
30.6
29.0
/CU.tt
2P.4
2t<.6
29.5
31.4
SEC
300
301
302
333
304
30S
30>>
307
3t/*j
3U9
310
311
JI2
313
314
3IS
316
317
JIB
319
320
. 321
322
323
324
32b
326
it' 7
32fc'
329
3.10
331
332
333
jj-
3Jb
336
337
336
339
340
341
342
3-3
344
345
3-6
347
3-b
3-9
MfH
33.4
35.6
37.5
3V. 1
40.2
41.1
41. H
42.4
42.8
43.3
4 ). 1
44.3
44.7
-5.0
45.2
45.4
-5.5
45.8
40.0
46.1
46.5
46.8
47.1
-7.7
-ri.3
4V. 0
4V. 7
50.3
51.0
51.7
52.4
SJ.l
bj.n
5-.S
b^.2
55.8
56.4
56.9
57.0
b/.l
57.3
57.6
57. (J
58.0
58.1
5d»4
56.7
58. d
'in. V
bf.O
SEC
350
351
352
353
354
35S
356
357
35H
35V
3hO
361
36?
363
364
365
366
367
J6d
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
37«
37V
340
JU1
3b2
383
38-
3»b
3«fi
387
3o8
3b9
390
391
39?
343
394
39S
396
397
398
399
MPM
S9.0
50.9
58.8
btt.6
5b.»
5d.2
58.1
56.0
57.9
57.6
57.4
57.2
37.1
57.0
57.0
56.9
S6.V
56.9
57.0
57.0
57.0
57. U
57. C
57.0
57.0
57.0
57.0
56.4
56.6
56.5
56.2
56. U
b6.0
56.0
56.1
5b.4
5o.7
56.9
57.1
57.3
57.4
57.4
57.?
57.0
56.9
56.6
56.3
56.1
56.4
56.7

-------
TABLE C-4 (Continued)
Sf C
400
4CI
40?
413
•.')•>
403
40S
40T
401
409
410
411
'•if*
413
414
41S
416
417
4|rt
410
4«:ii
4,M
4<;2
423
«•/<•
7 4^s
l-i «•/•!>
** -/t
i3
V. U
4 -,S
4 US
4 J7
4 (B
4 *9
4,(»
0-1
4-P
40
«*- —
«.-r.
4<.l>)
4n7
f-h
f.4
W**M
S7.1
S7.S
c./.d
S'l.O
->-t.o
s-.o
SH.O
Sl.O
SS.O
S7.9
e./.h
S7.7
S7.7
' ?.*
S/.V
«.n.O
S-t.l
Si. 4
Srf.9
SJ.l
SJ.4
S9.H
5s. 9
S<5.9
S-J.H
S-J.6
S 1.4
5'-*.2
Sv.l
S^.O
S1.S
SH.7
Sn.6
S~.S
\.*.-
S^.4
SM.i
s>».?
S'.l
s-'.o
57.9
S/.1*
S/.v
S7.9
S7.9
s«.o
S«.l
5M.1
S*.<>
EM. 2
^C
4«M)
4->l
4S<»
«.sj
4S<.
4',S
4S»,
4S7
-SH
Ur)=}
••.*0
»M
4r.«f
•.'..1
-n4
«.«-S
M»-».
^7
bf.~
far »
«70
-71
47?
471
«.?-
-75
-7f.
-77
47B
47^
uhO
4M
4f/f
..»•-,
U--
->-s
4*6
<--7
4"J
i.-!J
taV,l)
..'-1
-V?
«. )3
<4««4
'.')S
-v6
•.'.-7
<.'.<1
4V>*
M.'M sl ( v--v vf c lien
*>«.f *»tJ S<«.7 S^i' S-J.rt
S-l.l «%.S.n
•jrt.U 'i'j.-' S-.- SS-> S->.4
•ji.\. •>•• 1 !>•• .J Si « Si.^»
S^.U S.', ., -M..J SS.. -ji.!
S-i.tl S.l-» S-.c* SS'> •S3.'.
Sl.O '»!•« Si.l -,S" S<».>«
S".0 Si./ b'.l •>*> ' 34. o
S7.V St- •,'..! SSi -i-..^
S7.>« STi'. S-.O SS • S-».tf
Sn.i: -MI. '.-i." *>r" S- . 1
3^,l Ml S..u S^l 3 J.i
S1.1 Sl/- S-..I) S«? Si. 4
M.i* Si I S-.O st ;i sj.j
Sl.J 31- S-.'l SNi. 3J.|
s-«.3 -.I'-, ^4.1. ^hs s/>.-.
S-*.3 «>ir S'-.u Sf-i S^.fi
SH.? SI/ ^-.1 S»7 i^.4
S-f.l S|» •»-./' sv- -./•.<•
S i.V M • :.-.S '•'<•< S<;.1
S/.o S?r >>-.n S/fi S«J.l>
•J/.S -ar-'i S-.V S71 -> S/f. S/.i
S*,.l Srn 3-1.2 S7~ ii.u
SS.'I i^'i S-. . t t'l- •5f.ll
S->.^ S?? ST.^ 5/7 51.*
ST. -j -j.'i '>-..-> S7n 3l.h
3S.<- Sr— S'..n S7s SI. 4
s-i.l s t;i ss./ 3cn st.j
TT.9 SM c.-..n ^nl •so. 7
•>-.v S.I-- -.-..>• tP? S'J.J
S'..'' *•<•.! ^>*.n S^.l -<.-»
•3". 9 '• <- S-«.H S>-- *»-*.J
S<«.>» -,->s s-..;i SKS ..-1.7
S-.* S)' S-..0 3t>. 4rt.><0 4n.l
3i.» S4 | Sli.d S<«1 4.1,-
S'J.H S4/< Si.tJ Sv/' «.o.>«
5->.(l S4.i Sl.'J b'iS 4V. 0
So.l •?•.- S'..j SV4 4v. 1
ST.I 3'.- Si. D 5VS «.-J.l
SM.-J Sib So.O Sl"> -».0
34. «r S-.T S-..'. S'.7 H-».[;
11.. t S--' 5->.V Sr>0
nJl 4H.U c.SI
nu2 4/.9 632
MlJ H/.B 6lJ
n.'lH 4/./ ^S4
6U3 4/.V 613
HOT 4M.J O3O
107 4^.0 637
6'.H 41*.! tiSH
'•O; 4^.U f-S^
•iji) 41. V *00
oil 4i. U 661
M<* 47.1 f.62
otJ 4>i. «: «>f>3
ni<. 4b.l 6b4
r>lS 4^.1 60S
otti 41.2 f«oe
617 •.•!.>» t>>>7
Ol.T 4 /.I 63rt
f>i-< 4^.0 631*
1^0 4-«. / 6/0
Oj<;•> Sj.u 6/3
nrfh SJ.6 t>7t>
oi/ S".0 nil
624 54.1 67d
nj-v 54.4 h79
t>40 VJ4.7 hdO
^:»l 3S.1 6-11
6J2 SS.4 6o2
6JJ SL;.4 37 3?. 3 tiHl
Ojn S'l.c" 6?4
*3* 4>-,2 hdV
»>f«0 4>1.S OVO
•s'tl •i'>.«: 6V1
«j4<; 4h.o t9i;
043 4>>.U 693
t>l»4 41. J fj-
C'«3 46. >1 ft»3
n-o «.7.3 6vb
*>4? 41. sT oV7
6<«ri 4-t.o t.yd
•><.-» »0.5 64V
M^M
50.,?
bO.7
51.1
3l.7
52.2
5?. 5
52.1
51.6
51.1
51.0
51.0
51.1
51.4
51.7
52.0
S2.2
52.5
52.6
32.7
52.6
52.3
52.3
52.4
52.5
52.7
52.7
32.4
32.1
51.7
51.1
50.5
50.1
49. b
49.7
49.6
49.5
49.5
49.7
50.0
50.2
50.6
51.1
51.6
51.9
52.0
52.1
52.4
32.9
33.3
53.7
stc
700
701
702
703
704
705
7Qo
707
70d
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
. 722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
7JO
731
732
733
734-
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
7A4
7,5
746
747
748
749
HPH
54.2
54.5
54. b
55. 0
•iS.5
55.9
56.1
30.3
56.4
56.5
56.7
56.9
57. 0
57.3
57.7
56.2
5H.8
59.1
59.2
•»•».!..
5U.B'
5». 5
S9.1
57.7
57.3
57.1
56.6
56.5
56.2
55.5
54.6
54.1
53.7
53.2
52.-*
52.5
52.0
51.3
50.5
49.5
4H.5
47.6
46.8
45.6
44.2
42.5
39.2
35.9
32. 6
29.3
SEC
750
751
7->2
753
754
755
756
757
75H
759
760
761
762
763
764
765

HON



























i




MPH
26. B
24.5
21.5
19.5
17.4
15.1
12.4
9.7
7.0
S.O
3.3
2.0
0.7
0.0
0.0
SAMPLE OFF

APR Z2/74

































-------
             APPENDIX D
   The Potential Health Hazard of
   Nickel Compound Emissions from
Automotive Gas Turbine Engines Using
 Nickel Oxide Base Regenerator Seals
                by
         Robert B. Schulz
        EPA - AAPS Division
            April 1974

-------
                                CONTENTS






FORWARD	 ii




1.  INTRODUCTION	 D-l




2.  SUMMARY, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS	 Section III-K




3.  CARCINOGENICITY OF NICKEL OXIDE	 D-3




    3.1  Survey of Effects	D-3




    3.2  Experimental Evidence	 D-5




    3.3  Industrial Experience	 D-6




    3.4  Summary of Health Hazards.	 D-7




4.  PARTICULATE EMISSIONS  FROM A GAS TURBINE AUTOMOBILE	D-9




5.  ATMOSPHERIC CONCENTRATION ANALYSIS	 D-13




6.  NICKEL  CARBONYL HAZARD	 D-18




7.  REFERENCES	v.-*.......	...	D-2Q
                                    -i-

-------

-------
                                FOREWORD






        This  study was begun as a result of  a letter  from Mr. Eberhard



Tiefenbacher  of  Daialer-Benz Aktlengesellschaft,  Germany, pointing out



the carcinogenic hazard of nickel oxide exhaust fron  automotive, ga*



turbine engines  which use this material in their  regenerator rubbing



seals.




        This  report was prepared by Mr. Robert B.  Schulz  of the




Alternative Automotive Power Systems Division, Office of  the Mobile




Source Air Pollution Control, Office of Air  and Waste Management,




Environmental Protection Agency.  The author wishes to acknowledge



that  a major  portion of the survey on the Carcinogenic Potential of




Nickel Oxide  and all of the related findings and  recommendations



were  written  by  Dr. Michael D. Waters, Ph.D., Research Biochemist,




Pathobiology  Research Branch, Dr. Philip B.  Kane,  M.D., Research




Pathologist,  Pathobiology Research Branch, and Dr. David  L. Coffin,



V.M.D., Chief, Pathobiology Research Branch,  all  of the Experimental




Biology Laboratory, National Environmental Research Center, Research




Triangle Park, Environmental Protection Agency.



        The atmospheric concentration analysis was performed by the




Office of Research and Development,  Environmental  Protection Agency,




and reported  to  the author by Mr.  John B.  Mo ran.   The particulate




measurement was  performed by the Dow Chemical Company, Midland,




Michigan under contract to the Emission Control Technology Division,




Office of Mobile Source Air Pollution Control, Environmental Protection




Agency.   The author wishes to acknowledge  the assistaice provided by
                                   -ii-

-------
Mr. Tony Ashby, the Emission Control Technology Division Project Officer



and Mr. Otto J. Manary of  the Dow Chemical  Company  for their assistance



with the particulate measurement.  The author also  acknowledges the



assistance of Mr.  Clay Hubean of  Williams Research  Corporation, Walled



Lake, Michigan in  providing information  about the WR-26 turbine engine.
                                  -iii-

-------
1.  INTRODUCTION




        The potential public health impact of nickel oxide emissions




from automotive gas turbine engines being developed for light and




heavy duty applications has been investigated by the U.S. Environmental




Protection Agency.  A promising technological improvement for the gas




turbine engine is to use ceramic regenerators (rotary heat exchangers)




to achieve high efficiency.  At present, the most widely known and




usod composition for the high temperature rubbing seals required by




such regenerators contains NiO  (nickel oxide) and Ca?2 (calcium fluoride).



Since various nickel compounds are known or suspected carcinogens, this



has raised the question of whether anticipated wear of those seals in



use would lead to emission rates of NiO which could pose a new air




pollution problem.
                                 D-l

-------

-------
2.  SUMMARY, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS




         These are included as Section III-K in the main body of this




report.
                                   D-2

-------
3.  CARCIKOGENICITY OF NICKEL OXIDE



    3.1  Survey of Effects




        A survey on the carcinogenic potential  of nickel oxide  (with



reconmendations regarding its use in automobile gas  turbine engines




as a rubbing seal material),  was conducted by Waters, Kane and Coffin



(Reference  1) of the Pathobiology Research Branch, Experimental Biology




Laboratory,  National Environmental Research  Center,  Research Triangle




Park.  They were unable to find published reports that related directly




to the potential carcinogencity of nickel oxide as it may be produced




as an automobile exhaust product.  The survey of Index Medicus from




January 1963 to December 1970 and a National Library of Medicine Hedline




Search from January 1971 to June 1973 (pre-prints) yielded essentially




the sane information found by the author in a preliminary  survey  (Reference




3).



        Nickel is classified  as a. recognized respiratory carcinogen




based on the increased mortality from cancer of the  nose and from



cancer of the lung experienced by nickel refinery workers exposed to




nickel carbonyl (Reference 4).  Nickel Oxide should  be classified as




a potential  respiratory carcinogen because the  incriminating evidence




is predominantly restricted to observations  made in  experimental




animals.



        Malignant tumors have been produced  in  different animal species




by a variety of  nickel compounds introduced  by  different routes




(Reference 5).   Intramuscular injection of nickel oxide dusts into C3H



and Swiss Mice resulted in the development of sacromao (Reference 6).
                                  D-3

-------
NiO dust implanted in the muscle tissue of NIH black rats resulted in

tumors  (Reference 7).  The less soluble nickel compounds, such as

nickel  oxide, have been found  to have the higher carcinogenic potential

Human evidence is at present not available linking nickel oxides to the

development of cancer of the respiratory system in man.  Chronic expo-

sure to nickel oxide fumes of  metal dressers in a steelworks showed

(Reference 8) no evidence of lung cancer after 19 years.  NiO is  In-

cluded  ia a chronic exposure study  (Reference 9) of the cocarcinogenic-

ity of  cigarette smoke and various industrial pollutants in hamsters.

The above evidence supports the classification of NiO as a potential

respiratory carcinogen, with further evidence needed to change the

classification to stupested or recognised respiratory carcinogen.

Being a potential respiratory  carcinogen, however, is probably enough

to cause serious concern about the level of NiO concentration in the

exhaust of an automobile gas turbine engine.

        At the present time, nickel oxide is implicated as a potential

carcinogen principally through association with the group of nickel

compounds whose carcinogenic properties are well documented by indus-

trial experience and experimental investigation (References 10 and 11).

In general, the forms found to be sparingly soluble in water at 37°C

(nickel dust, nickel sulfide,  nickel carbonate, nickel oxide, nickel

carbonyl and nickelocene) have been identified as carcinogens.  To

quote Sunderman (Reference 10):

             "Intraosseous, intramuscular, subcutaneous and intra-
        plural injections of the insoluble nickel compounds have
        resulted in the development of osteogenic sarcomas, fibro-
        sarcomss and rhabdomysarcotnas.  It is significant that
                                  D-4

-------
         induction of  carcinomas  of  the  histological  types that
         occur  among nickel workers  (i.e.  squamous  cell and
         anaplastic carcinomas) has  only been  accomplished fol-
         lowing exposures by  the  respiratory route."

 3.2   Experimental Evidence

         Aside  from reports of  induction of  rhabdomyosarcomas by intra-

 muscular implantation of nickel  oxide (Reference 6 and 7), the most

 incriminating  experimental evidence against this compound is that it

 may  function as a cocarcinogen.   Toda (Reference 12} has reported that

 intratracheal  administration of  a mixture of  nickel  oxide and methy1-

 cholanthrene to rats  resulted  in a  much greater incidence of pulmonary

 carcinomas than in rats which  received  methylcholanthrene alone.

         Other  studies which  are  pertinent to  the discussion are the

 following:  Bingham,  et al.  (Reference  13)  have shown that exposure

 of rats  at approximately l/10th  of  the  current  threshold  limit value

 (TLV) (Img/m3) for nickel results in hypersecretion  in the bronchial

 epithelium and focal  infiltration by lymphocytes in  the alveolar walls

 and  perivascular spaces.  Alveolar  macrophages  displaying an altered

 size distribution profile could  be  recovered  by ""avage in increasing

 numbers  with repeated exposure to nickel  oxide.  Furthermore, focal

 thickened  areas were  evident in  alveolar  walls  and occasionally in the

 respiratory bronchi.   These  changes,  though not  necessarily of pathologic

 significance or irreversible, occur at  such low levels of exposure as

 to warrant further investigation.   It should  be  clearly recognized

 that TVL's  cannot  be  validly applied  to the general  population since

 they are intended  to  provide guidelines for industrial workday exposure

of healthy  individuals.
                                 D-5

-------
        In agreement with the  ICRP Committee II Task Group on Lung




Dynamics  (Reference 14), Wehner and Craig  (Reference 9) have demon-




strated that nickel oxide displays moderate lung retention.  In their




studies using Syrian golden hamster, "Nearly 20% of the inhaled nickel




oxide was retained in the lungs after initial clearance, and 45% of




this was still present after 45 days."  Nickel oxide concentrations




ranged from 10 to 190 ^jg/liter.  The compound was not acutely toxic to




hamsters at any  level employed.  However,  prolonged lung retention




increases the concern over the possibility of inducing chronic changes.



The minimum latent period for  induction of tumors by finely divided




nickel is reported by Hueper  (Reference 15) to be 6 months.  It should




be noted  that some animals in  the Wehner and Craig study (Reference 9)




are being observed for chronic changes.



        Sanders  et al. (Reference 16) have shown that the degree of




solubilization of nickel oxide particles in biological fluids (tissue




culture medium 199) is slight  but measurable.  Their studies with




Syrian golden  hamsters demonstrated that  more nickel oxide particles




were found free  in alveolar lumens when pulmonsary clearance was



impaired by exposure to cigarette smoke.   This effect might be expected




to potentiate adverse responses to nickel  oxiue although none were



described.  It should be pointed out that many individuals within the




general population will display impaired clerance mechanisms because




of underlying broncho-pulmonary disease.




3.3  Industrial  Experience



        Nickel workers undoubtedly have a higher prevelance of nasal
                                  D-6

-------
and respiratory cancer than the general population.  Sundenaan (Reference




10) concluded that the incidence of lung cancer among nickel workers




ranged from 2.2 to 16 times the incidence in the general population.




and the reported incidence of cancer of the nooe and paianaaal sinuses




was 37 to 196 times the expected values.  Despite  the fact that nickel




oxide is a ;-imal component of refining dust it is  difficult to define



its relative role as a causative agent.  Nickel oxide is a minor component




of dust (e.g. 6.3Z) as compared with nickel sulfide (e.g. 59.0%) and the




latter has been shown to yield a significantly higher incidence of




rhabdomyosarcomas in rats  (Reference 6).  Furthermore, it is often impos-



sible to dissociate the carcinogenic properties of nickel compounds from




those of other metals that are usually present.  The recent report by




Saknyn and Shabynina (Reference 17) on the Increased mortality from




cancer among workers exposed to nickel oxide and sulfide, for example,




also mentioned the presence of arsenic and cobalt  in the refining



atmosphere.




3.4  Summary of Health Hazards




        The principal concerns over the release of additional nickel oxide




to the atmosphere relate to the following facts:



        1.  The compound produces muscle sarcomas  when the injected




            into rats (Reference 6 and 7).



        2.  Nickel oxide may function as a cocarcinogen when intro-




            duced into the lungs with a known carcinogen (Reference 12).




        3.  Low level (100-150 #g/m3) nickel oxide exposure may result




            in histological changes in bronchi and alveoli (Reference 13).
                                  D-7

-------
4.  Nickel oxide Is cleared relatively slowly from the




    respiratory tract (Reference 15).




5.  Cigarette smoking may impair clearance of nickel




    oxide and potentiate tissue dairage (Reference 15).




6.  Nickel oxide has been implicated by association in




    the higher incidence of nasal and lung cancer ob-




    served among nickel workers (Reference 10, 11, 17).
                          D-8

-------
4.  PARTICULATE MEASUREMENT




        The exhaust participates  from  the Williams Research Corporation




gas turbine powered AMC Hornet automobile were measured at The Dow




Chemical Company in Midland, Michigan  (Reference 18).  This prototype



vehicle was powered by the WR-26  gas turbine engine which utilized two




ceramic disc regenerators.  The flame  sprayed regenerator rubbing seal




material composition was 90 percent NiO and 10 percent Ca?2.



        Vehicle testing was done  on a  dynamometer using the following



vehicle driving test procedures:




MFCCS      Modified 1975 Federal  Driving Cycle    Cold Start   41 min.




FCHS       1975 Federal Driving Cycle             Hot Start    23 win.



50MPHSS    Steady State 50 MPH                    Hot Start    60 min.




        Only one-half of the engine exhaust was measured.  A 5-inch




stainless-steel flexible tube was used to couple the exhausr pipe to




the exhaust inlet of the dilution tube.  A description of the particulate




measurement methods is contained  in Reference 19.



        A summary of the measured total participates, trace nickel and




trace calcium is given in Table I.  The total particulates reported in




the table were collected with a millipore filter.  The NiO emissions



rate was determined from the percent nickel from emission spectroscope




analysis of the total particulate and  assumes all NiO.



        It was discovered after the test that engine transmission oil




was collected in the particulate  sample.  The oil vent pipe was connected




into the exhaust pipe used for exhaust measurement.  A trace element




analysis of the synthetic ENCO Turbine Oil 274 gave a nickel concentration
                                  D-9

-------
                                                 TABIE D-l
o
PARTICULATE MEASUREMENT TEST RESULTS
Vehicle
Test
No.
260 A
260 B
260 C
260 D
Test
Mode
MFCCS
FCHS
FCHS
50 MPH SS
WR-26
Total
Partlculatea
(Grains /mile)
.676
.288
.269
.139
Gas Turbine Vehicle
Trace Nib
(Percent)
0.4
0.7
0.6
0.3
NiOc
(Grams /Mile)
.0034
.0025
.0020
1 .0005
Trace Cab
(Percent)
1.1
3.4
3.6
0.7
CaF2c
(Grams/Mile)
.015
.019
.019
.019
         a!42 mm millipore  filter



          Trace metals analysis  of  exhaust particulate



         cAssumes all NiO or CaF2»  19.84 mph or 50 mph

-------
of < 1 ppw and a calcium concentration of  7 ppm.  It was concluded




that the transmission oil probably did not  affect the nickel particulate




measurement, but  did raise   the   total    particulate measurements.




It was planned to re-run the  test series, however, before this could



be done, the engine  had co be overhauled.




        After 68 hours of operation  the WR-26 gas turbine engine, was




overhauled because of excess  leakage through the regenerator seals.



It was found that the high pressure  hot side insulation had broken



loose and lodged under the seals, causing the excess leakage,  The in-




sulation material was sodium  silicate (water glass) and asbestos.




Significant amounts  of nickel have been found in other asbestos, and




therefore the insul ition could  be a  source  of soase of the nickel in



the exhaust particulate.  Thia  was not investigated further because




there was sufficient NiO/CaF2 seal wear to  account for the nickel




emissions.



        The extent of regenerator seal wear required seal replacement*




In general, the wear was uneven, with little or no wear in some areas,




and wear almost through to the  base  plate in other areas.  The estimated




average wear on the  four high pressure seals was 0.009 inch.  A detailed




dimensional inspection of the seals  was not made before engine running,




so it was impossible to obtain  accurate seal wear rates.



        An attempt was made by  analysis to  correlate the estimated average



seal wear rate with  the particulates measured in grams/mile-  Thero was




good agreement between the calculated N10 emission rate of 0.040 grams/




mile and the treasured NiO emission rate given in Table I.  The calculated
                                 D-ll

-------
CaF2 emission rate was 0.0045 grams/mile, which is much less than the




measured CaF2 emission rate.  This may be because CaF2 is the lubricant




which flows under pressure  from  the NiO solid matrix during regenerator



operation.




        The measured NiO  emission rate ranged from 0.0005 grams/mile




for the 50 MPH  steady state test to 0.0034 grams/mile for the modified



federal driving cycle cold  test. An estimate of 0.003 to 0.005 grams




NiO per mile was given to the EPA Monitoring and Data Analysis Division,




Source Receptor Analysis  Branch  to do their atmospheric concentration




analysis.  The  somewhat higher estimate of the NiO emissions was made




to be conservative and account for the lower power output of the WR-26



engine, rated at 80 horsepower compared to a more likely range of




100 to 150 horsepower if  automobile gas turbines were used widely.



This doesn't necessarily  follow, however, as improvements in engine




performance and seal design should go toward reducing the seal wear




rate.



        It is therefore important to obtain additional participate




measurements on gas turbine automobile and heavy duty vehicles.  EPA




Intends to measure the particulates from the Chrysler Baseline Engine




after it has been converted from metal to ceramic regenerators.  Initial




testing of the  Baseline Engine will be done with NiO/CaF2 seals, in




order to obtain baseline  seal and ceramic regenerator performance.  It is,




however, EPA's  intention  to develop an alternate seal material for the




Baseline Engine that does not use NiO or other hazardous materials.
                                  D-12

-------
 5.  ATHOSHPERIC CONCENTRATION ANALYSIS
         The industrial threshold limit values (TLVs) for nickel and its
 compounds are summarized as follows:
                 Material                      TLV (m£/m3)
             Nickel carbonyl                   .007 (7
             Nickel, metal and soluble         1 (1000 ag/m3)
               salts (as nickel)
         This is the safe level for an 8 hour per day, 5 working day per
 week exposure.  Ambient air quality standards for the general population
 would be set at much lower levels then this.  Further, the data obtained
 with low level (100-150 jug/m3) nickel oxide exposure suggest that the
 TLV may be too high.  Also NiO is not a soluble salt, but rather is a
 nearly insoluble oxide, anc" therefore the TLV may not necessarily apply.
         Ambient urban concentrations of nickel in 1968 varied from a
 low arithmetic mean of .006^«g/m3 to a high of .224 /Ig/m3 (Reference 20).
 The maximum concentration observed was in Portland,  Maine (1.30 flfg/m3).
 The frequency distribution for nickel in Portland  for 1968 was  as follows:
                     Frequency Distribution.  Percent
              Min.   10%   20%    30%   40%   50%  60%   70%   80%   90%  Max.
 (Ni -fig/m3)   .009   .009   .016  .02   .03   .052   .11   .13   .46   .73  1.3
The  average arithmetic mean urban concentration  of nickel from  84 urban
KASN stations  in 1968  was  .036 /ig/'m3.  A typical distribution for the
"average" urban site was as follows:
                       Oakland , California
                    Frequency Distribution, Percent
             Min.  If?"   20%   30%   40%   50%   60%   70%   80%    90%   Max._
(Ni -ig/a3)   .006  .03.  .013  .016  .017  .026  .03   .034   .037   .097   .140
                                  D-13

-------
        The maximum yearly average urban nickel concentration for 1969




occurred in New York City (0.173 ^g/m3) with a quarterly composite maxi-




mum of 0.330 jig/m3 which occurred for  the  1st quarter of 1969.




        Nickel has been determined as  one  of the trace metals in automo-




tive exhaust particulate under  contract programs conducted by both the




EPA Office for Research and Development (ORD) and  the EPA Office of Air




and Water Programs  (OAWP) over  the last three years.  A review of all




related reports and prepared  estimates of  nickel (as the mono-oxide)



emissions from various automotive power systems give the ranges and "best



estimate" emission rates are  summarized in Table II.




        The concentrations of nickel in various fuels has been reported




by Lee and von Lehmden  (Reference 21)  as well as the soiree emissions




levels of nickel.  Th«*se are  summarized in Table III.



        NiO exposures ware estimated based upon the extensive projections




developed by ORD which modeled  sulfate exposures from oxidation catalysts




on conventional piston engines. The projected exposures were made for




NiO on and near major arterial  throughways with the following assumptions:




        1.  25% of vehicle miles with  turbine engine vehicles,




        2.  Nickel mono-oxide emissions are  .005 gm/mile from



            turbine engine vehicles and zero from  the remaining




            vehicles.
                                   D-14

-------
                              TABLE D-II

                   NICKEL EMISSIONS FROM  LIGHT-DUTY

                  MOTOR VEHICLES (CALCULATED AS  NIO)
Vehicle System

Conventional/current

Conventional/oxidation
             catalyst

Conventional/Quescer
             catalyst

Conventional/thermal reacter

Diesel (LDMV)

Stratified Charge

Turbine (LDKV)  (Williams)
*OAWP data and estimate
(1) one data point only
                                  NiO Emissions in grams/mile
     Range

.000009 - .00025

.000005 - .0001


    .0003 (1)


    .00067 (1)

    .00008 (1)

    .0002 (1)

 .0005 - .0034
Best Syste

   .00003

   .00001


   .0003


   .0006

   .00008

   .0002

   .005*
                                   D-15

-------
                              TABLE D-III

                    CONCENTRATION OF NICKEL IN FUELS
Source

Fuels;  Gasoline 0-)

        Fuel oil
        Consumer purchased fuel
          additives

        Fuel additives<2>
Source Emissions:

        Phosphate rock

        Zn/Cu Smelter

        Ferro alloy

        Brass/bronze Smelter

        Coal Flyash

        Coal fired powerplant

        Pb Smelter

        Cement plants

        Fe/Steel foundry

        Incinerator
Concentration, wt. % of nickel

        .0003 - .0005

        .0001 - .01


        .00003

        0




        .0001 - .01

        .0001 - .01

          .01 - .1

         .001 - .1

         .001 - .008

        .0001 - .01

            0 - .0001

          .01 - .1

         .001 - .1

          .01 - .1
(1) Fuel Surveillance Program (F & FA) and Contract Program (CPS-22-69-145)

(2) Based upon current records in Office of Fuel and Fuel Additive
    Registration, ORD, NERC/RTP.
                                   D-lfi

-------
        The results of the exposure analysis are as follows:

1 hour peak exposure  (vehicle occupant,                 12.4
worst meteorology, worst wind condition)

1 hour peak exposure  (pedestrian,
worst meteorology, worst wind condition)                 8.8/|gtn/m3

24 hour average exposure  (as 1 hour
conditions)                                              1.45/»gm/m3

Incremental 26 hour exposure  (as 1 hour
conditions, commuter  living near throughway)             0.88
        It  is  concluded  that  the  emission  of KiO from  automotive tur-

bine engines of  .005 grams/mile and  the  attendant exposure of the public

to the  incremental increases  of this metal oxide is «a unnecessary risk. The

evidence against nickel  oxide is  sufficient to warrant development of

alternate materials for  use in automobile  turbine engine rubbing seals.

Since urban ambient levels of nickel are relatively high at present,

due consideration should be given to any sources likely to increase these

levels .
                                    D-17

-------
6.  NICKEL CARBONYL HAZARD




        It Is also possible that  the operation of an engine which




generates impure nickel and carbon monoxide from combustion might result




in ccnditions favorable for formation of nickel carbonyl in the exhaust




stream.  Nickel carbonyl, Ni(CO>4, may be present wherever carbon monoxide



contacts nickel and nickel alloys.  Therefore, if nickel oxide is to be




considered further, it should be  demonstrated that nickel carbonyl is not




a combustion product.  The case for extreme toxicity and carcinogenicity




of nickel carbonyl is virtually unquestioned (Reference 10).



        Reference 22 gives the equilibrium concentrations of Ni(CO)^ as




a function of temperature, total  pressure, and CO concentration at levels



of 0.0005 to 3.0 mole-percent in  the feed gas.  This would be an estimate



of the maximum concentration of nickel carbonyl from a reacting system,




Other data indicates that nickel  carbonyl can be formed in significant



concentrations at 120°F any time  the concentration of carbon monoxide




exceeds 100 ppm in the presence of finely divided nickel.  The nickel




carbonyl readily decomposes at temperature above 140°F and forms nickel




oxide in dry air and/or nickel carbonate in moist air.



        The WR-26 automotive turbine engine exhaust temperature is 200°F




at idle to 500°F at full power.   These temperatures are high enough to




prevent the formation of nickel carbcnyl.  This should also be the case




with other automotive gas turbine engines.



        The actual presence of NiO in the WR-26 turbine engine exhaust




has not been confirmed.  Only a trace element measurement of nickel in



the exhaust particulate has been  made.  Some of the nickel may be the more
                                   D-18

-------
soluble nickel sulfate, NiSO^, or possibly the very toxic form of nickel



carbonyl, Ni(CO),.  As the emission of nickel carbonyl would greatly



increase the public health risk, it would be prudent to identify the form



of the nickel compounds emitted.
                                    D-l?

-------
                             REFERENCES


 1.  M.D. Waters, P.B. Kane and D.L. Coffin, Survey on the Carcinogenic
     Potential of Nickel Oxide,  (Memo from M.D. Waters, Experimental
     Biology Laboratory, National Environmental Research Center,
     Environmental Protection Agency, May 29, 1973).

 2.  J.B. Moran, Potential Public Health Risk of NiO Emissions from
     Gas Turbine Light-Duty Motor Vehicle Powerplants, (Memo from J.B.
     Moran, Office of Research and Development, Environmental Protection
     Agency, December 5, 1973).

 3.  R.B. Schulz, Potential Carcinogenic Hazard from Automobile Gas
     Turbine Engine Exhaust of Nickel Oxide Regenerator lluKoing Seal
     Material, (Memo, Alternative Automobile Power Systems Division,
     Environmental Protection Agency, April 20, 1973).

 4.  G. Kazantzis, Chromium and Nickel, Ann. Occup. Hyg.. 15: 25-29 (1972).

 5.  F.W. Sunderman, Jr., Metal Carcinogenesis in Experimental Animals,
     Food and Cosmetics Toxicology. Vi 105-120 (1971).

 6.  J.F.W. Oilman, Metal Carcinogenesis, II A Study on the Carcinogenic
     Activity of Cobalt, Copper, Iron, and Nickel Compounds, Cancer
     Research. 22_:  158-162 (February 1962).

 7.  W.W. Payne, Carcinogenicity of Nickel Compounds in Experimental
     Animals, Proc. of the American Assoc. for Cancer Research, 5_:  50
     (1964).

 8.  J.G. Jones and C.G. Warner, Chronic Exposure to Iron Oxide, Chromium
     Oxide, and Nickel Oxide Fumes of Metal Dressers in a Steelworks,
     Brit. J. Industr. Med.. 29:  169-177 (1972).

 9.  A.P. Wehner and O.K. Craig, Toxicology of Inhaled NiO and CoO in
     Syrian Golden Hamsters, An. Ind. Hyg. Assoc. J., 33;  146-55 (March
     1972)

10.  F.W. Sunderman, Jr., Nickel Carcinogenesis, Pis. Chest, Vol. 54,
     No. 6 (December 1968).

11.  E. Mastromatteo, Nickel:  A Review of Its Occupational Health Aspects,
     J. Occupa. of Med., Vol. 9, No. 3 (March 1967).

12.  M. Toda, Experimental Studies of Occupational Lung Cancer, Bull Tokyo
     Med. Dent. U., 9 (3); 440 (1963).
                                   D-20

-------
13.  E. Bingham, W. Barkley, M. Zerwas, K. Stemmer and P. Taylor,
     Responses of Alveolar Macrophages to Metals, I. Inhalation of Lead
     and Nickel, Arch. Environ. Health. Vol. 25 (December 1972).

14.  ICRP Committee II, Task Group on Lung Dynamics:  Deposition and
     Retention for Internal Dosimetry of the Human Respiratory Tract,
     Health Phya. 12_:  1963 (1966).

15.  W.C. Hueper, Texas Repts. Biol. Med.. 10, 167 (1952).

16.  C. Sanders, T. Jackson, R. Adee, G. Powers and A. Wehner,
     Distribution of Inhaled Metal Oxides Particles in Pulmonary
     Alveoli, Arch. Intern. Med.. Vol. 127 (June 1971).

17.  A.V. Saknyn and N.K. Shabynina, Some Statistical Materials on
     Carcinogenic Hazards in the Production of Nickel on an Ore Oxide
     Base, Industr. Hyg. and Occupa. Pis.. 14:  10-13 (November, 1970).

18.  Chassis Dynamometer Vehicle Test Report No. 5, Dow Chemical
     Company, Midland, Michigan (August 13, 1973).

19.  The Dow Chemical Company, Effect of Fuel Additives on the Chemical
     and Physical Characteristics of Particulate Emissions in Automotive
     Exhaust, EPA-R2-72-Q66 (December 1972).

20.  Air Quality Data for Metals, 1968 and 1959 (APTD-1467).

21.  R.E. Les and D.J. von Lehmden, Trace Metal Pollution in the Environment,
     APCA Journal. 2J, No. 10  (October 1973).

22.  R.S. Brief, F.S. Venable, and R.S. Ajemian, Nickel Carbonyl:  Its
     Detection and Potential for Formation, Am. Ind. Hyg. Assoc. J. 26;
     72  (1965).
                                   D-21

-------
                  APPENDIX E
ALTERNATIVE AUTOMOTIVE 70WER SYSTEMS DIVISION
     ANNUAL, FINAL, AND SUMMARY REPORTS
                  MAY 1974

-------
              ALTERNATIVE' AUTOMOTIVE  POWER  SYSTEMS DIVISION

                    ANNUAL, FINAL,  AND SUMMARY  REPORTS

                                 MAY   1974
     The attached  list of publications  are  annual, summary and final
reports of work  performed under study and development contracts and
interagency  agreements funded by the Alternative Automotive Power
Systems (AAPS) Program of the Office of Air and Water Programs (OAWP)
of the U.S.  Environmental Protection Agency.

     The Air Pollution Technical Data  (APTD)  Series and Environmental
Protection Agency  (EPA) Series Reports  are  issued to report technical
data of interest to a  limited readership.

     These reports may be obtained in either  paper copy or microfiche
format by specifying the N1IS Accession Number and submitting the amount
listed (payment  must accompany orders)  to the National Technical
Information  Service (NTIS).

                       National Technical Information Service
                       U.S.  Department of Commerce
                       5285 Port Royal Road
                       Springfield, Virainia  22151
                       Telephone:  (703)321-8543

     The absence of an NTIS Accession Number  indicates that the report
is not presently available from the NTIS.   Inquiries regarding future
availability may be directed to the AAPS Program Office.

                       Alternative Automotive  Power Systems Division
                       U.S.  Environmental Protection Agency
                       2929 Plymouth Road
                       Ann Arbor, Michigan   48105
                       Telephone:  (313)761-5230  Ext. 296

     Federal  employees,  current contractors and grantees, and non-profit
oraanizations may  obtain copies of these reports, free of charge, as sup-
plies permit, by requesting  the publication number (APTD Series or EPA
Series) from  the Air Pollution Technical Information Center (APTIC).

                       Air Pollution Technical Information Center
                       U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
                       Research Triangle  Park, North Carolina  27711
                       Telephone:  (919)  549-2573
                                  E-l

-------
                                        INDEX
            cvcTr                  BRAYTON CYCLE             HEAT ENGINE/
            SYSTEM                POMER SYSTEM              FLYWHEEL HYBRID
      APTD - 0573                  APTD  - 0958               APTD - 0750
             0574                        1226                      1121
             0707                        1290                      1181
             0959                        1291                      1182
             0960                        1343                      1344
             09fil                        1359                      1468
             0980                        1374
             1154                        1441
             1155                        1454

             1357                        1457               HEAT ENGINE/
             1358                        1517               BATTERY HYBRID
             1516                        1546               APTD - 0724
             1517                        1558                      Q725
             1545                  EPA-460/9-73-001                 0762
             1554                                                  0957
             1558                                                  t346
             1563                                                  1355
             1564                                                  1468
             1565
             1566
 EPA-460/3-73-001
                                  MODELS                    BATTERY DEVELOPMENT
                                  APTD - 0960               APTD - 0875
                                         0961                       "26
                                         0966                      1345
                                                            APPENDIX
STRATIFIED  CHARGE                                            RELATED REPORTS
    ENGINE
     APTD  - 1356
                                         E-2

-------
                                 APTD SERIES REPORTS
APTD - 0573                                     NTIS ACCESSION NUMBER:  PB 193-418
    REPORT DATE:  June  1970                     NTIS PAPER COPY PRICE:  $3.00
    CONTRACT NUMBER:  CPA  22-69-132             NTIS MICROFICHE PRICE:  $1.45
    CONTRACTOR:   Thermo Electron  Corporation
    REPORT TITLE:   "Conceptual  Design  Rankine  Cycle Power System With Organic
                    Working Fluid  and Reciprocating Engine for Passenger Vehicles."


APTD - 0574                                     NTIS ACCESSION NUMBER:  PB 193-417
    REPORT DATE:  June  1970                     NTIS PAPER COPY PRICE:  $3.00
    CONTRACT NUMBER:  CPA  22-69-128             NTIS MICROFICHE PRICE:  $1.45
    CONTRACTOR:   The Marquardt  Corporation
    REPORT TITLE:   "Study  of Continuous  Flow Combustion Systems for External
                    Combustion Vehicle  Powerplants."


APTD - 0707                                     NTIS ACCESSION NUMBER:  PB 202-196
    REPORT DATE:  Undated                       NTIS PAPER COPY PRICE:  $3.00
    CONTRACT NUMBER:  EHS  70-106                NTIS MICROFICHE PRICE:  $1.45
    CONTRACTOR:   Solar  Division of International Harvester Company
    REPORT TITLE:   "Low Emission  Burner  for Rankirve Cycle Engines for Automobiles."


APTD - 0724                                     NTIS ACCESSION NUMBER:  PB 201-645
    REPORT DATE:  June  1,  1971                  NTIS PAPER COPY PRICE:  $6.00
    CONTRACT-NUMBER:    F04701-70-C-0059         NTIS SICROFICHE PRICE:  $1.45
    CONTRACTOR:   The Aerospace  Corporation
    REPORT TITLE:   "Hybrid Heat Engine/Electric Systems Study." (Volume I)


APTD - 0725                                     NTIS ACCESSION NUMBER:  PB 20>646
    REPORT DATE:  June  1,  1971                  NTIS PAPER COPY PRICE:  $6.00
    CONTRACT NUMBER:    F04701-70-C-0059         NTIS MICROFICHE PRICE:  $1.45
    CONTRACTOR:  The Aerospace  Corporation
    REPORT TITLE:   "Hybrid Heat Engine/Electric Systems Study." (Volume II)


APTD -0750                                      NTIS ACCESSION NUMBER:  PB 200-143
    REPORT DATE:  April 39,  1971                NTIS PAPER COPY PRICE:  $3.00
    CONTRACT NUMBER:  EHS  70-104                NTIS MICROFICHE PRICE:  $1.45
    CONTRACTOR:  Lockheed  Missiles and Space Company
    REPORT TITLE:   "Flywheel  Feasibility Study  and Demonstration."


APTD - 0762                                     NTIS ACCESSION NUMBER:  PB 203-463
    REPORT DATE:  April 1971                    NTIS PAPER COPY PRICE:  $3.00
    CONTRACT NUMBER:  EHSH 71-002               NTIS MICROFICHE PRICE:  $1.45
    CONTRACTOR:  TRW Systems Group
    REPORT TITLE:  'Analysis and Advanced Design Study of an Electromechanical
                   Transmission."
                                         E-3

-------
  A   nrJSr n,,^    ,  ,   ,                       NTIS ACCESSION NUMBER:  PB 205-254
     REPOR, DATE:  July  1971  (Annual )*         NTIS PAPER COPY PRICE:  $3.00
     CS'!SJCTftNWB£R:  W-31-107-Eng-38         NTIS MICROFICHE PRICE:  $1.45
     CONTRACTOR:  Argonne rational  Laboratory
     REPORT TITLE:  "Development  of High-Energy Batteries for Electric Vehicles."


  APTD - 0957                                    NTIS ACCESSION NUMBER:  PB 198-093
    'REPORT DATE:  January 28,  1971             NTIS PAPER COPY PRICE:  $3.00
     CONTRACT NUMBER:  EHS 70-107              NTIS MICPQFICHE PRICE:  $1.45
     CONTRACTOR:  Minicars,  Inc.
     REPORT TITLE:  "Emission Optimization  of  Heat  Engine/Electric Vehicle."


  APTD - 0958                                    NTIS ACCESSION NUMBER:  PB 202-251
     REPORT DATE:  August 1971                  NTIS PAPER COPY PRICE:  $3.00
     CONTRACT NUMBER:  EHS 70-115              NTIS MICROFICHE PRICE:  $1.45
     CONTRACTOR:  United Aircraft Research  Laboratories
     REPORT TITLE:  "Manufacturing Cost Study  of  Selected Gas Turbine Automobile
                    Engine Concepts"


  APTD - 0959                                    NTIS ACCESSION NUMBER:  PB 208-237
     REPORT DATE:  August 1971                  NTIS PAPER COPY PRICE:  $3.00
     CONTRACT NUMBER:  EHS 70-123              NTIS MICROFICHE PRICE:  $1.45
     CONTRACTOR:  AiResearch Manufacturing  Company
     REPORT TITLE:  "Compact Condenser for  Rankine  Cycle Engines."            	


  APTD - 0960                                    NTIS ACCESSION NUMBER:  PB 209-277
     REPORT DATE:  February  1972                NTIS PAPER COPY PRICE:  $3.00
     CONTRACT NUMBER:  EHS 70-111              NTIS MICROFICHE Pi .ICE:  $1.45
     CONTH'fTOR:  General Electric Company
     REPORT TITLE:  "Modeling,  Analysis, and Evaluation of Rankine Cycle Propul-
                    sion Systems."  (Volume I).


  APTO - 0961                                    r.'TIS ACCESSION DUMBER:  PB 209-278
     REPORT DATE:  February  1972                NTIS PAPER COPY PRICE:  $6.00
     CONTRACT NUMBER:  EHS 70-111              NTIS MICROFICHE PRICE:  $1.45
     CONTRACTOR:  General Electric Company
     REPORT TITLE:  "Modeling,  Analysis, and Evaluation of Rankine Cycle Propul-
                    sion Systems."   (Volume II).


  APTD - 0966                                    NTfS ACCESSION NUMBER:  PB 209-266
     REPORT DATE:  October 1971                 NTIS PAPER COPY PRICE:  $6.75**
     CONTRACT NUMBER:  F19628-71-C-0002        NTIS MICROFICHE PRICE:  $1.45
     CONTRACTOR:  The Mitre  Corporation
     REPORT TITLE:  "Advanced Automotive Power System  Structured Value Analysis
                    Model."


 *NOTE:  See APTD-1126 for July 1970 Annual Report.

**Paper copy not presently available  from NTIS.

                                          E-4

-------
     nr,..    ,  ,                          N7IS ACCESSION NUMBER:
     REPORT  DATE:   July 1971                    N',.  PAPER COPY PRICE:

                                                     MICROFICHE PRICE:
     REPORT  TITLE:   "Evaluation  of a  Low NOx Burner."


 APTO  -  1121                 ..                  NTIS ACCESSION PUMBER:  PB 210-057
     REPORT  DATE:   February 25,  1972            NTIS PAPER COPY PRICE:  **.00
     CONTRACT NUMBER:   68-04-0034              NTIS MICROFICHE PRICE:  $1.45
     CONTRACTOR:  Sundstrand Aviation
     REPORT  TITLE:    "Hybrid Propulsion  System Transmission Evaluation."


 APTO  -  1126                                   NTIS ACCESSION NUMBER:  PB 197-376
     REPORT  DATE:   July 1970 (Annual)*         NTIS PAPER COPY PRICE:  $3.00
     CONTRACT NUMBER:   W-31-107-Eng-38         NTIS MICROFICHE PRICE:  $1.45
     CONTRACTOR:  Argonne  National  Laboratory
     REPORT  TITLE:   "Development of High-Energy Batteries for Electric Vehicles."


 APTD  -  1154                                   NTIS ACCESSION NUMBER:  PB 210-836
     REPORT  DATE:   May  5,  1972                  NTIS PAPER COPY PRICE:  53.00
     CONTRACT NUMBER:   EHS 70-102              NTIS MICROFICHE PRICE:  $?.45
     CONTRACTOR:  Thermo Electron Corporation
     REPORT  TITLE:   "Detailed Design, Ranki He-Cycle Power -System  With Organic-
                     Based  Working Fluid  and Reciprocating Expander for Automo-
                     bile Propulsion"   (Volume I - Technical Report).


 APTD  -  1155                                    NTIS ACCESSION NUMRER:  PB 210-837
     REPORT  DATE:   Kay  5,  1972                  NTIS PAPER COPY PRICE:  S3. 00
     CONTRACT NUMBER:   EHS 70-102              NTIS MICROFICHE PRICE:  $1.45
     CONTRACTOR:  Thermo Electron Corporation
     REPORT TITLE:   "Detailed Design, Rankine-Cycle Power System With Organic-
                     Based  Working Fluid  and Reciprocating Expander for Automo-
                     bile Propulsion"   (Volume II - Appendices).


 APTD  -  1181                                    NTIS ACCESSION NUMBER:  PB 212-097
     REPORT DATE:   November  1971                NTIS PAPFR COPY PRICE:  S3. 00
     CONTRACT  NUMBER:  68-04-0033               NTIS MICROFICHE PRICE:  $1.45
     CONTRACTOR:  Mechanical  Technology  Incorporated
     REPORT TITLE:   "Feasibility Analysis of the Transmission for a Flywheel/
                    Heat Engine Hybrid Propulsion System."


 APTD - 1182                                    NTIS ACCESSION NUMBER:  PB 213-342
     REPORT DATE:  July 31, 1972                NTIS PAPER COPY PRICE:  S3. 00
     CONTRACT NUXBER:  68-04-0048               NTIS MICROFICHE PRICE:  $1.45
     CONTRACTOR:  Lockheed Missiles and Space Company, Inc.
     REPORT TITLE:   "Flywheel Drive Systems Study."
*NOT£:  See AP7C-OS75 for July 1971 Annual Report
                                        E-5

-------
APTD - 1226                                     NTIS  ACCESSION NUMBER:  PB 220-148
    REPORT DATE:   August 1972                  NTIS  PAPER COPY PRICE:  $6.00
    CONTRACT NUMBER:   EHSH 71-003              NTIS  MICROFICHE PRICE:  $1 45
    CONTRACTOR:   Thermo Mechanical  Systems Company
    REPORT TITLE:   "The Study of Low Emission Vehicle Powerpldnts Using
                    Gaseous Working  Fluids."


APTD - 1290                               .,     NTIS  ACCESSION NUMBER:
    REPORT DATE:   May 1972                     NTIS  PAPER COPY PRICE:
    CONTRACT NUMBER:   68-04-0013               NTIS  MICROFICHE PRICE:
    CONTRACTOR:   United Aircraft Research Laboratories
    REPORT TITLE:  "Automotive Gas  Turbine Optimum Configuration Study."


APTD - 1291*                                    NTIS  ACCESSION NUMBER:  PB 213-389
    REPORT DATE:   July 14, 1972                NTIS  PAPER COPY PRICE:  $6.00
    CONTRACT NUMBER:   68-04-0012               NTIS  MICROFICHE PRICE:  $1.45
    CONTRACTOR:   AiResearch Manufacturing Company of Arizona
    REPORT TITLE:  "Automobile Gas  Turbine Optimization  Study"


APTD - 1343                                     NTIS  ACCESSION NUMBER:  PB 213-370
    REPORT DATE:   June 1972                    NTIS  PAPER COPY PRICE:  $6.00
    CONTRACT NUMBER:   68-01-0406               NTIS  MICROFICHE PRICE:  $1.45
    CONTRACTOR:   General Electric Company
    REPORT TITLE:  "AatdTiObiTe Gas  Turbine - Optimum Cycle Selection Study."_


APTD - 1344                                     NTIS  ACCESSION NUMBER:  PB 213-417
    REPORT DATE:   March 1972                   NTIS  PAPER COPY PRICE:  $6.75
    CONTRACT NUMBER:   ''R00017-62-C-0604        NTIS  MICROFICHE PRICE:  $1.4?,
    CONTRACTOR:   John Hopkins University - Applied Physics Laboratory
    REPORT TITLE:   "Heat-Engine/Mechanical-Energy-Storage Hybrid Propulsion
                    Systems for Vehicles."


APTD - 1345                                     NTIS  ACCESSION NUMBER:  PB 213-257
    REPORT DATE:   April 1972                   NTIS  PAPER COPY PRICE:  $3.00
    CONTRACT NUMBER:   68-04-0028               NTIS  MICROFICHE PRICE:  $1.45
    CONTRACTOR:   TRW  Systems Group
    REPORT TITLE:   "Develop High Charge and Discharge  Rate Lead/Acid Battery
                    Technology."


APTD - 1346                                     NTIS  ACCESSION NUMBER:
    REPORT DATE:   November 1971                NTIS  PAPER COPY PRICE:
    CONTRACT NUMBER:   EHSH 71-009              NTIS  MICROFICHE PRICE:
    CONTRACTOR:   Tyco Laboratories,  Incorporated
    REPORT TITLE:   "Lead/Acid Battery  Development  for  Heat Engine/Electric
                    Hybrid  Vehicles."


*KOTE:   APTD-1546  is  a  Summary  of This  Report.

                                          E-6

-------
APTDn-  1^55                                    NTIS ACCESSION NUMBER:  PB 213-280
    S2! DATE:   Apri1  1972                   NTIS PAPER COPY PRICE:  $3.00
    CONTRACT NUMBER:   68-04-0058               NTIS MICROFICHE PRICE:  $1.45
    CONTRACTOR:  TRW  Systems  Group
    REPORT TITLE:   "Cost and  Emission Studies of a Heat Engine/Battery Hybrid
                    Family Car."


APTO -  1356                                    NTIS ACCESSION NUMBER:
    REPORT DATE:  January 31V1972             NTIS PAPER COPY PRICE:
    CONTRACT NUMBER:   68-04-GU40  (Phase  II)    NTIS MICROFICHE PRICE:
    CONTRACTOR:  Cornell  Aeronautical Laboratory, Inc.
    REPORT TITLE:   "An  Evaluation of the Stratified Charge Engine (SCE)
                    Concept."


APTD -  1357                                    NTIS ACCESSION NUMBER:  pB 222-849
    REPORT DATE:   December 1972                NTIS PAPER COPY PRICE:  $5 50
    CONTRACT NUMBER:   68-01-0430               NTIS MICROFICHE PRICE:  II'AB
    CONTRACTOR:  Chandler Evans
    REPORT TITLE:   "Vapor Generator Feed Pump for Ranklne Cycle Automotive
                    Propulsion  System (Chardler Evans)."


APTD -  1358                                    NTIS ACCESSION NUMBER:  PB 222-871
    REPORT DATE:   December 1972                NTIS PAPER COPY PRICE:  $3 50
    CONTRACT NIWBER:   68-01-0437               NTIS MICROFICHE PRICE:  $^45
    CONTRACTOR:  Lear Motors Corporation
    REPORT TITLE:   "Vapor Generator Feed Pusnp for Ranklne Cycle Automotive
                    Propulsion  System."


APTD -  1359*                                   NTIS ACCESSION NUMBER:
    REPORT DATE:   December 1972                NTIS PAPER COPY PRICE:
    CONTRACT  NUMBER:   68-01-0405               NTIS MICROFICHE PRICE:
    CONTRACTOR:  Williams  Research Corporation
    REPORT TITLE:   "Automotive Gas Turbine Economic Analysis."

APTD -  1374                                    NTIS ACCESSION NUMBER:
    REPORT DATE:   February 1973                NTIS PAPER COPY PRICE:
    CONTRACT  fiUMBER:   68-04-0014               NTIS MICROFICHE PRICE:
    CONTRACTOR:  A1Research Manufacturing Company of Arizona
    REPORT TITLE:   "Low NOx Emission Combustor Development for Automobile
                    Gas Turbine Engines."

APTD - 1441                                    NTIS ACCESSION NUMBER:  pe 222-818
    REPORT DATE:  February 1973                NTIS PAPER COPY PRICE:  $7,25
    CONTRACT NUMBER:  68-04-0016               NTIS MICROFICHE PRICE:  $1.45
    CONTRACTOR:  Solar Division, International Harvester Company
    REPORT TITLE:  "Low NOx Emission Combustor for Automobile Gas Turbine
                   Engines."
  *  NOTE:   See Supplement Report EPA-460/9-73-001
                                        E-7

-------
     RFD™? nA-rr   c ».      ,«,                 NTIS ACCESSION NUMBER:  PB 222-340
     rnE?5lr? LE^ornebr^orXJ973                NTIS PAPER COPY PRICE:  $11.25
     222J2«2UMBER:  68-°4-°°17               HTIS MICROFICHE PRICE:  $1.45
     25IHCJ9R:  Northern Research and Engineering Corporation
     REPORT TITLE:  "Low NOx Emission Combustor for Automobile Gas Turbine
                    Engines (Northern Research  and Engineering Corporation)."


 APTD -  1457                                    NTIS ACCESSION NUMBER:  PB 222-075
     REPORT DATE:   February 1973                NTIS PAPER COPY PRICE:  $6.75
     CONTRACT NUMBER:  68-04-0015               NTIS MICROFICHE PRICE:  $1.45
     CONTRACTOR:  United Aircraft of Canada  Limited
     REPORT TITLE:  "Low NOx Emission Combustor for Automobile Gas Turbine
                    Engines."


 APTD -  1468                                    NTIS ACCESSION NUMBER:
     REPORT DATE:   March 1972                   NTIS PAPER COPY PRICE:
     CONTRACT NUMBER:  Interagency              NTIS MICROFICHE PRICE:
     CONTRACTOR:  Bureau of Mines
     REPORT TITLE: "Emission Characteristics of Spark  Ignition Internal
                    Combustion Engines Used  as  the Prim® Mover 1n a Hybrid
                    System."


 APTD -  1516                                    HTIS ACCESSION NUMBER:
     REPORT DATE:   April  1973                   NTIS PAPER COPY PRICE:
     CONTRACT NUMBER:  EHS 70-117               NTIS MICROFICHE PRICE:
     CONTRACTOR:   Battelle Columbus Laboratories
     REPORT TITLE:   "Low Emission Burners  for Automotive Rar.kine Cycle
                    Engines."


APTD -  1517                                     NTIS ACCESSION NUMBER:
     REPORT DATE:   May  1973                     NTIS PAPER COPY PRICE:
     CONTRACT  NUMBER:   68-04-0033               NTIS MICROFICHE PRICE:
     CONTRACTOR:   Mechanical  Technology Incorporated
     REPORT TITLEr   "Transmission for Advanced  Automotive Single-Shaft Gas
                    Turbine and  Turbo-Rsnkine Engine."


APTD - 1545                                     NTIS ACCESSION NUMBER: PB 222-349
    REPORT DATE:  July 1972                     NTIS PAPER COPY PRICE: $11.25
     PRIME  CONTRACT NUMBER:   68-04-0004         NTIS MICROFICHE PRICE: $1.45
     PRIME  CONTRACTOR:   Steam Engine Systems Corporation
     SUB CONTRACTOR:  The  Bendix Corporation
     REPORT TITLE:   "Steam Car Control  Analysis."
                                          E-8

-------
APTDDrnIS?niiTr   c  .  L   ,r  ,               NTIS ACCESSION NUMBER:
    REPORT DATE:  September 15, 1972            NTIS PAPER COPY PRICE:
    SirLT8!^  68-°4-°012                NTJS MICROFICHE PRICE:
    S™!^10*1  MResearch Manufacturing Company of Arizona
    REPORT TITLE:  "Automobile Gas Turbine Engine Study"
    NOTE:  This is a summary report of APTD-1291.


APTDn- 1554                                     NTIS ACCESSION NUMBER:
    REPORT DATE:  June, 1973                    NTIS PAPER COPY PRICE:
    CONTRACT NUMBER:  68-04-0019                NTIS MICROFICHE PRICE:
    CONTRACTOR:  University of Michigan
    REPORT TITLE:  "Heat Transfer and Flew Friction Performance of Heated
                   Perforated Flat Plates"


 APTD - 1558                                    NTIS ACCESSION NUMBER:
    REPORT DATE:  December 15, 1972             NTIS PAPER COPY PRICE:
    CONTRACT NUMBER:  68-04-0034                NTIS MICROFICHE PRICE:
    CONTRACTOR:  Sunstrand Aviation
    REPORT TITLE:  "Transmission Study for Turbine and Rankine Cycle Engines"


 APTD - 1563                                    NTIS ACCESSION NUMBER:
    REPORT DATE:  June  1973                     NTIS PAPER COPY PRICE:
    CONTRACT NUMBER:  68-04-0030                NTIS MICROFICHE PRICE:
    CONTRACTOR: Monsanto Research Corporation/Sunstrand Aviation
    REPORT TITLE:   "Optimum Working Fluids for Automotive Rankine Engines,
                    Volume  I - Executive Summary"


 APTD - 1564                                    NTIS ACCESSION NUMBER:
    REPORT DATE:  June  1973                     NTIS PAPER COPY PRICE:
    CONTRACT NUMBER:  68-04-0030                NTIS MICROFICHE PRICE:
    CONTRACTOR:  Monsanto Research Corporation
    REPORT TITLE:   "Optimum Working Fluids for Automotive Rankine Engines,
                    Volume II - Technical Section"

 APTD - 1565                                    NTIS ACCESSION NUMBER:
    REPORT DATE:  June  1973                     NTIS PAPER COPY PRICE:
    CONTRACT NUMBER:  68-04-0030                NTIS MICROFICHE PRICE:
    CONTRACTOR:  Monsanto Research Corporation
    REPORT TITLE:  "Optimum Working Fluids for Automotive Rankine Engines,
                    Volume III - Technical Section - Appendices"


 APTD - 1566                                    NTIS ACCESSION NUMBER:
    REPORT DATE:  June  1973                     NTIS PAPER COPY PRICE:
    CONTRACT NUMBER:  68-04-0030                NTIS MICROFICHE PRICE:
    PRIME CONTRACTOR:   Monsanto Research Corporation
    SUBCONTRACTOR:  Sunstrand Aviation
    REPORT TITLE:  "Optimum Working Fluids for Automotive Ranklni Engines,
                   Volume IV - Engine Destgn Optimization"
                                       E-9

-------
                              EPA SERIES REPORTS
EPA - 460/9-73-001                              NTIS ACCESSION NUMBER:
    REPORT DATE:  July ]?73                     NTIS PAPER COPY PRICE:
    CONTRACT NUMBER:  68-01-0405               .NTIS MICROFICHE PRICE:
    CONTRACTOR:  Williams Research Corporation
    REPORT TITLE:  "Automotive Gas Turbine Economic Analysis, Investment
                   Cast Turbine Wheel Supplement"
    NOTE:  This 1s a supplement to APTD - 1359.


EPA - 460/3-73-001                              NTIS ACCESSION NUMBER:
    REPORT DATE:   September  1973                NTIS PAPER COPY PRICE:
    CONTRACT  NUMBFR:  68-01-0461                NTIS MICROFICHE PRICE:
    CONTRACTOR:   General  Electric  Company
    REPORT TITLE:   "Development of Low  Emission Porous-Plate Combustor
                     for Automotive Gas  Turbine and  Rankine Cycle Engines"


EPA - 460/3-73-003                             NTIS ACCESSION  NUMBER:
    REPORT DATE:   October 1973                 NTIS PAPER COPY PRICE:
    CONTRACT  NUMBER:  68-01-0408                NTIS MICROFICHE PRICE:
    CONTRACTOR:   General  Hectrlc  Company
    REPORT TITLE:   "Design of Recriprocatlng Single Cylinder
                    Expanders for Steam Final Report"


EPA - 460/3-73-004                             NTIS ACCESSION  NUMBER:
    REPORT DATE:   October 1973                 NTIS PAPER COPY PRICE:
    CONTRACT  NUMBER:  68-04-0036                NTIS MICROFICHE PRICE:
    CONTRACTOR:   Solar Division  International Harvester Company
    REPORT TITLE:   "Low Emission Combustor/Vapor  Generator for  Automobile
                     Rankine  Cycle  Engines".
                                       E-10

-------
                                    APPENDIX

                       REPORTS RELATED TO THE MPS PROSRAM
APTD - 69-51                                     NTIS ACCESSION NUMBER:   PB 192-321
    REPORT DATE:  October 1969                   NIIS PAPER COPY PRICE:   $3.00
    CONTRACT NUMBER:  PH 86-67-109               NTIS MICROFICHE PRICE:   $1.45
    CONTRACTOR:  Battelle Memorial Institute
    REPORT TITLE:  "Study of Unconventional Thermal. Mechanical, and Nuclear
                   Low-Pollution-Potential Power Sources for Urban Vehicles."


APTD - 69-52  "                                   NTIS ACCESSION NUMBER:   PB 194-814
    REPORT DATE:  October 1969                   NTIS PAPER COPY PRICE:   $3.00
    CONTRACT NUMBER:  PH 86-67-108               NTIS MICROFICHE PRICE:   $1.45
    CONTRACTOR:  Arthur D. Little. Inc.
    REPORT TITLE:  "Prospects for Electric Vehicles, A Study of Low-PolIut1on-
                   Potential Vehicles - Electric."
                                        E-ll

-------