-------
IV. ENGINE BASELINE EVALUATIONS
Transient and steady-state evaluations of the Cummins NTC-400 engine
were conducted with primary emphasis on obtaining definition of attainable
exhaust temperatures. The evaluations were conducted in accord with stated
requirements, while taking into account the capabilities of the available test
cell.
Transient cycle test results are summarized in Tables 3 and 4, and the
computer printouts are in Appendix A. The highest exhaust temperature
observed for longer than a few seconds during the transient cycle was 530°C
(985°F). This temperature was attained in the exhaust manifold prior to the
turbocharger. Maximum temperature subsequent to the turbocharger was
380°C (715°F), and, as indicated by these data, insulating the exhaust manifold
did not have a significant effect.
TABLE 3. TRANSIENT CYCLE TEST RESULTS
Cummins NTC-400 (CPL531)
Test
Emissions, g/*
BL-1
BL-2
Avg.
BL-0
INS-Oa
Avg.
Cold
Cold
Cold
Hot
Hot
Hot
Composite
BL-1
BL-2
Avg.
BL-0
INS-Oa
Avg.
Cold
Cold
Cold
Hot
Hot
Hot
Composite
English Units (* = hp-hr)
1.03
1.02
1.03
5.77
6.58
6.2
654
651
595
594
595
0.50 2.8 603 6.3
Metric Units (* = kW-hr)
1.38 4.55 864 7.74
1.37 5.10 883 8.82
1.38 4.83 874 8.28
0.50 3.62 797 8.33
0.59 3.69 797 8.59
0.55 3.66 797 8.46
0.452
0.462
0.46
0.416
0.415
0.42
0.42
0.275
0.281
0.278
0.253
0.253
0.253
26.4
18.78
19.08
18.93
19.87
19.76
19.82
0.67 3.83 808 8.43 0.257 19.69
alnsulated exhaust manifold
10
-------
TABLE 4. TEMPERATURES DURING TRANSIENT CYCLE TEST
Maximum Temperature, °C(°F)
Pre-Turbo Two Feet Post-Turbo
Test Cycle Momentary Stabilizeda Momentary Stabilized*3
BL-1 Cold 560 520 380 380
BL-0 Hot 560 530 390 380
INS-OC Hot 560 530 390 380
BL-1 Cold (10*0) (970) (715) (715)
BL-0 Hot (10*0) (985) (735) (715)
INS-Oa Hot (10*0) (985) (735) (715)
aFor about *0 seconds (above 11 percent oxygen by volume)
bFor about 20 seconds
clnsulated exhaust manifold
In the transient cycle, most of the non-idle operation appears to be high-
speed with relatively low power. The approximate breakdown of the transient
cycle is as follows:
Idle *0%
Cut Throttle 15%
Other *5%
Of the 60% at Speeds Greater than Idle:
Speed Greater than 70% of Rated *5%
Speed Greater than 80% of Rated 35%
Speed Greater than 90% of Rated 20%
Of the *5% with Torque Greater than Zero:
Torque Greater than 30% of Rated 30%
Torque Greater than 60% of Rated 15%
Torque Greater than 90% of Rated 10%
The maximum power condition maintained for an extended period of
time is about 80 percent of rated torque at 90 percent of rated
speed.
Therefore, with the exception of idle, there appears to be relatively little
low-speed operation. In addition, there appears to be relatively little high-
torque operation. The torque level has significant effect on exhaust
temperature, with higher torque producing higher temperatures.
11
-------
This NTC-400 engine had the highest power output of any engine
evaluated to date over the transient cycle in this laboratory. Difficulties were
encountered in getting through the transient cycle due to repeated blowing of a
fuse in the dynamometer control circuitry at some point in the cycle. The
cycle statistics could not be met. These factors were not considered to have a
significant effect on exhaust temperatures, but could have some effect on
emissions. The dynamometer control system in this test cell was modified prior
to the subsequent evaluations with the particulate traps.
Data obtained during the steady-state evaluations of this engine in its
standard configuration are included in Appendix A. The exhaust temperature
and oxygen concentration data are considered to be of primary importance, and
these data are presented in graphic form in Figure 3. The highest before-the-
turbocharger exhaust temperature was obtained at maximum power at an
engine speed of 1100 rpm. Attainable temperatures decreased with increases or
decreases in engine speed from the 1100 rpm. Temperatures that would provide
assured regeneration were obtainable at engines speed between 900 and 1500
rpm.
Data were also received from Cummins on an engine of the same model.
The data associated with the maximum exhaust temperature at each engine
speed evaluated are summarized as follows:
A/F Exh. (Stack) Exh. Oxygen
RPM HP Ratio Temp., QC(°F) Cone., %
1300 309 18.8 603(1118) 4.0
1500 347 22.4 543(1009) 6.6
1700 375 25.6 504 (940) 8.4
1900 400 28.2 474 (886) 9.4
2100 400 30.3 457 (854) 10.2
Min. for Regeneration 600(1110) 3
These data generally agree with the data developed in this work assignment.
Data for equivalent air-fuel ratio conditions of approximately 31.5 are
summarized as follows:
Exh. Stack Exh. 02 Max. HP/
Ratio RPM HP Temp.. PC Cone.. % HP Max. HP
31.6 1300 123 413 10.7 309 30%
31.1 1700 225 442 10.5 375 60%
31.6 2100 359 440 10.7 400 90%
Exhaust temperature was primarily a function of the air-fuel ratio, with power
output having only a relatively minor effect.
12
-------
800 -
. 700
aaximum Temperature Curve
t Maximum Throttle
600
\
\ 1700 rpm
\
1900 rpm
2100 rpm
500
I
I
6 8 10
Exhaust Oxygen Concentration, Vol. %
12
14
Figure 3. Pre-turbo exhaust temperature vs oxygen from map
of Cummins NTC-400 (CPL531)
13
-------
Exhaust temperature and oxygen concentration data, with the intake
restricted to the maximum possible without resulting in turbocharger surge, are
summarized in Appendix A-9. With this amount of intake restriction, the
maximum temperature during the transient cycle should be around 610°C. Of
course, this amount of intake restriction would probably only be applicable to
barometric pressures equal to or higher than the barometric pressure at San
Antonio (i.e., only at altitudes below 600 feet).
Relative to insulating the exhaust system, it appears that insulation is
not critical relative to the exhaust manifold and/or the exhaust pipe. The
effect of insulating the turbocharger was not determined at that time, but it
was considered doubtful that insulation would have a major effect during
transient operation. At the transient cycle operating condition producing
maximum exhaust temperature, the temperature drop in the exhaust manifold
was determined to be negligible. At that same operating condition, the
temperature drop in two feet of exhaust tubing was only about 5°C (9°F).
In summary, the maximum temperature normally attained in the exhaust
system (i.e., obtained during the transient cycle) of the NTC-400 engine was
considered to be marginal for regeneration of the particulate trap. Operating
conditions existed with this engine, however, such as high power at low to
moderate engine speeds, at which regeneration could be assured.
14
-------
V. PARTICULATE TRAP BYPASS SYSTEM
A primary purpose of this work assignment was evaluation of the concept
of particulate trap bypass. In the event that the trap becomes loaded with
particulate (i.e., due to operation under conditions not producing the
temperatures necessary for regeneration), automatic bypass of the trap would
occur until temperature conditions for regeneration are attained in the exhaust.
Bypass Design Considerations
Considerable thought was given to the design of a bypass/regeneration
system, including a brainstorming session and several discussions with the EPA
Branch Technical Representative. Some of the findings, ideas, and tentative
conclusions are discussed as follows:
The following is based on relatively frequent operation at, or near, wide-
open-throttle and governed engine speed. Vehicle operating modes under which
this condition is expected to occur are: accelerating through the gears in urban
operation, and passing or hill-climbing on the highway. This condition occurs in
both the engine dynamometer and the chassis dynamometer transient cycles
developed by the EPA.
With the foregoing operating assumption, the exhaust backpressure on the
engine side of the particulate trap can be used to determine a need for bypass
of the trap. When the exhaust backpressure reaches some selected value, the
bypass valve would be actuated. The only operation foreseen during which this
control method would be inappropriate was that by a very "light-footed," "slow-
speed" driver (such a driver was considered to be rare or non-existent with the
classes of heavy-duty vehicles being considered in this project). Therefore, it
appeared that a relatively simple method existed for determining when to
bypass.
Control parameters for regeneration and for deactivation of bypass,
however, do not appear to be as straightforward, unless the conditions for
regeneration frequency occur for relatively long periods of time during normal
operation of the vehicle. If regeneration temperature were to occur frequently
during normal operation, exhaust temperature could be used as the criteria for
when to deactivate a bypass condition.
If a supplemental method is required to achieve regeneration, the criteria
for deactivation of the bypass condition will likely be effected by the criteria
used for activation of regeneration. The same parameter(s) used to actuate the
regeneration system should also be applicable for deactivation of the bypass. It
appears likely that exhaust temperature would be the parameter used, or at
least one of the parameters used.
Another consideration was minimization of temperature shock to the trap
upon deactivation of bypass. Several methods were considered for reducing
temperature shock, but it was subsequently determined that temperature shock
was not a significant problem.
15
-------
The primary concern with this system was the same as that for any other
trap system, that is, protection against destructive regeneration. The best
protection against destructive regeneration appears to be frequent
regeneration, to assure that the participate does not build up to potentially
destructive amounts. One approach would be to set the bypass control
parameter at a level which will restrict the trap loading to an amount that
could not produce a destructive regeneration. The practicability of such an
approach, however, has not been established. Again, the regeneration method
used appeared to be an important consideration affecting the selection of the
parameters for deactivation of bypass.
A basic design for a bypass system was developed, and that system is
illustrated in Figure 4. This design was based on the following:
• Use of a high efficiency trap
• Periodically attaining conditions necessary for regeneration
• Application of relatively simple, inexpensive components
• System fails in a through-the-trap exhaust flow configuration
This system was designed to function in the following manner. The trap
collects particulate until regeneration occurs, or until the backpressure during
WOT acceleration is sufficiently high to actuate the pressure switch. When the
backpressure is sufficiently high to actuate the pressure switch, the exhaust is
switched to and remains in bypass. When the trap inlet temperature is
sufficiently high to actuate the temperature switch, the exhaust again flows
through the trap. If the trap exit temperature becomes excessive, the exhaust
flow is switched to bypass until the exit temperature decreases to some
predetermined acceptable temperature.
Other criteria could result in major changes in the design of a bypass
system. If conditions for regeneration are not periodically attained, provisions
would be required to assist attaining such conditions. If unassisted regeneration
can not be attained, it would appear that the potential benefits of bypass would
be greatly reduced. If large reductions in trapping efficiency become
allowable, external bypass may not be necessary (e.g., some early low-
efficiency wire-mesh traps were difficult to plug). Attaining regeneration
temperature, without special operational provisions, could require the use of
traps in the exhaust manifold. Application of manifold traps could greatly
affect the bypass criteria.
Internal Bypass - Another possible approach is the use of internal bypass
(e.g., a wall-flow ceramic trap with a controlled number of unplugged cells).
This approach was analyzed briefly, but was not actually considered for use in
this work assignment. A very brief mathematical analysis was made to
estimate the potential for internal bypass. Since the mathematics for such
determination are extremely complex, estimation techniques were used. The
results obtained are considered to be illustrative of results which could be
attained using internal bypass within the trap. The basis for the numbers used
was the experience with a Corning trap used on a light-duty vehicle in previous
16
-------
NC Time
Delay
Relay
NO
Temp.
Switch
NO
Pressure
Switch
Pneumatic
Actuated
Bypass
Valve
+12v.
NO
NC
+12v.
Normally Open
Normally Closed
Particulate
Trap
NC
Pneumatic
Solenoid
NO
Temp.
Switch
tn
w
a
f
Pressure
to Bypass
Valve
Exhaust
Figure 4. Schematic of a potential particulate trap bypass system
17
-------
EPA Contract 68-03-2873.(6) The results of the brief analysis are summarized
in the following illustration:
100 f
o
to
50
W
ffi
•H
a
0
•-
300 miles
Trap w/o Bypass
Traps with Internal Bypass
0 L
0
800 miles
50
Trap AP, "H20
100
Based on the results obtained from this brief analysis, it appears that
internal bypass might be applicable if the decrease in trapping efficiency is
acceptable. There are, however, a couple of unknowns concerning internal
bypass. One is the large differences in flow velocity across the inlet of the
trap: one or two orders of magnitude higher flow velocity through the
unplugged cells. This could result in a decrease in overall trapping efficiency
from that calculated on the basis of percent of exhaust flow. Another unknown
concerns regeneration, especially if such a trap with internal bypass were to
become completely filled with participate in all except the unplugged cells.
In looking at the pros, cons, and unknowns concerning internal bypass, it
appears that the concept could be worthy of some consideration if low trapping
efficiency is acceptable if low trapping efficiency is acceptable. Wire wool and
ceramic foam traps might also be amenable to a form of internal bypass. In
fact, some of the early, less efficient wire wool traps were difficult to plug
past some point.
Bypass System - The bypass system shown in previous Figure * was
assembled for use in this work assignment. A "breadboard" type system was
built using available and/or readily obtainable components. The purpose of this
system was to evaluate "proof of concept." A schematic showing the
components used is included in Appendix B.
18
-------
This system was found to function basically as designed (i.e., it would
bypass at the set pressure, and would deactivate the bypass at the set
temperature). It did appear, however, that differential pressure across the
particulate trap might be a better criterion to use, rather than the inlet
pressure to the trap. The bypass valve was mounted between the exhaust
manifold and the turbocharger. Under some steady-state operating conditions,
the bypass valve experienced temperatures of up to 800°C. This valve, which
was an existing unit that had previously been used in a post turbocharger
application, was found to be inadequate for long term operation in a pre-
turbocharger environment. This fact, however, did not have a major effect on
the determination of "proof of concept" for a particulate trap bypass system.
Bypass Operational Considerations - The bypass system was designed to
function without the use of logic circuitry. Bypass is deactivated when the
exhaust reaches a set temperature. Regeneration of the trap then requires that
this exhaust temperature be maintained until the trap is heated; a number of
minutes is required to bring a cold particulate trap up to temperature. In the
transient cycle, a high exhaust temperature is not maintained for a sufficiently
long period of time to enable bringing a cold particulate trap up to a
temperature necessary for regeneration.
A trap with a large build-up of particulate is a potential candidate for a
destructive regeneration. A simple bypass control, such as applied in this work
assignment, assumes frequent occurrence of engine operating conditions which
will provide sufficient backpressure with a loaded trap to actuate the bypass. If
such operating conditions do not occur in some vehicle applications, a high
loading of particulate can occur on the particulate trap before actuation to
bypass occurs. If conditions necessary for regeneration are not attained,
deactivation of bypass might never occur. Designing around such potential
situations requires a more complicated control system.
Engine performance, primarily under transient operation, is better with
the exhaust going through a non-restricting, short-coupled bypass than when
exhaust goes through a "high mass" particulate trap. It would appear that such
a situation could be conducive to tampering, and that system design should be
such that engine performance with exhaust through the trap should be equal to
or better than performance with the exhaust through bypass.
In general, it appears that design of a bypass system with simple controls
is dependent on occurrence of engine operation producing extended periods with
exhaust temperatures sufficient for regeneration. Such modes of engine
operation do not exist in the transient cycle. If it is necessary to provide a
means of producing such modes of operation, it may be as well to incorporate a
means of frequently providing increased exhaust temperatures to produce
regeneration, and could eliminate a need for bypass.
19
-------
VL EVALUATION OF PARTICULATE TRAPS AND BYPASS SYSTEM
In addition to evaluating bypass of participate traps, another primary
purpose of this work assignment was to determine if regeneration could be
obtained during operation over the transient cycle. Other areas studied were
the effect on engine performance and the particulate removal efficiency of the
participate traps.
Exhaust configurations included: dual Corning particulate traps and a
bypass system mounted between the engine exhaust manifold and the
turbocharger; a single Corning particulate trap close-coupled between the
exhaust manifold and turbocharger; and a Johnson Matthey particulate trap
mounted as close as practical to the exhaust outlet of the turbocharger. In
addition, an evaluation was conducted with a straight section of tubing
replacing the dual Corning traps.
A. Summary and Discussion of the Results
The average results of hot-start emissions evaluations are summarized in
Table 5 and are shown graphically in Figure 5. The order of presentation on the
figure is based on work produced over the transient cycle.
With either the single or dual Corning particulate traps, exhaust
particulate in the hot-start tests was reduced by eighty to eighty-five percent.
With the Johnson Matthey trap, particulates were reduced by about fifty
percent. In the bypass mode, and with the two Corning traps replaced with a
straight section of tubing, particulates increased over baseline values by about
thirty-five and forty-five percent, respectively.
TABLE 5. AVERAGE RESULTS FOR HOT-START TRANSIENT TESTS
BSFC, Work,
Tests Configuration HC CO CO? NOV Part. Ib/hp-hr hp-hr
Initial Baseline 0.4 2.7 595 6.3 — 0.42 26.5
BLWO In Bypass Mode 0.5 4.2 575 5.7 0.54 0.40 24.5
BLWT Two Corning Traps* 0.5 5.5 630 5.2 0.07 0.44 20.0
BLDT Dummy Trap 0.5 4.5 565 5.2 0.59 0.40 24.0
TBL Baseline Check 0.6 3.4 560 6.0 0.42 0.39 26.0
BLST One Corning Trap 0.5 5.1 580 5.4 0.07 0.41 23.0
JM JM Trap 0.1 3.7 575 6.0 0.21 0.40 25.5
FBL Final Baseline 0.5 3.4 575 6.5 0.39 0.40 25.0
aln parallel.
In general, CO increased and NOX decreased with decrease in work
produced over the cycle. HC remained essentially unchanged, except for a
significant decrease with the trap from Johnson Matthey. Fuel consumption
increased with the more major decreases in cycle work.
20
-------
26
24
22
20
I
1
1
I
1
0.45
Oft 0.40
o
H
0.35
I
1
1
I
I
0.6
0.4
0.2
I
I
I
I
I
i r
Baseline
Johnson
Matthey
Post Turbo
Bypass
Straight
Pipe
One
Corning
Trap
Two
Corning
Traps
Trap/Bypass System Between Manifold and Turbo
Figure 5. Graphical presentation of the results for hot-start transient test
21
-------
Cummins NTC-400 Engine with Bypass
Control System
Particulate Trap Bypass
Control System
Johnson Matthey
Particulate Trap
Figure 6.
System with Two Corning Filters and
a Bypass System
Views of the engine, bypass system controls, and
particulate trap installations
22
-------
The amount of turbocharging is affected by the mass flow rate and the
density of the exhaust gases. Addition of particulate traps, or just additional
tubing, between the exhaust manifold and the turbocharger results in a "heat
sink" and in heat losses due to conduction/convection. Loss in exhaust gas
temperature results in decreased turbocharger effectiveness. In addition, any
increase in exhaust backpressure reduces the amount of exhaust flow, which
decreases the amount of turbocharger boost. In the configurations evaluated,
the effect of the temperature drop with pre-turbocharger mounted
configurations appeared to be the primary factor affecting engine performance.
With one or more particulate traps mounted prior to the turbocharger,
cold-start operation was significantly affected. Power output was reduced
until the exhaust system was thoroughly warmed-up; warm-up required as long
as several minutes.
Without the use of carbon catalysts, a temperature of approximately
600°C, or greater, is required for regeneration of the particulate trap. Without
"relatively drastic" reduction in intake air flow, post-turbocharger
temperatures of 600°C were found to be unattainable during "normal operating
conditions." Prior to the turbocharger, however, exhaust temperatures above
600°C occur even during operation over the transient cycle; but such
temperatures occur for only short periods of time. With one Corning
particulate trap mounted close-coupled to the exhaust manifold, some
regeneration of the trap occurred during operation over the transient cycle. By
appropriate reduction in air flow to the engine, conditions for regeneration
could be readily achieved with a single Corning particulate trap close-coupled
to the exhaust manifold. By design optimization of the particulate trap system
parameters (e.g., system mass, heat losses, and flow restriction) it appears that
significant improvements could be achieved in the results obtained in these
rather cursory evaluations.
B. Results of Steady-State Evaluations
Steady-state evaluations were conducted over a range of engine operating
speeds from near idle speed to governed speed. These evaluations included
operation at the "standard" intake restriction of 50 centimeters (20 inches) of
water column at 2100 rpm with maximum power, and operation with the
maximum intake restriction that did not result in occurrence of turbocharger
surge under some engine operating conditions. Results of these evaluations are
given in Appendix A-5 through A-9, and are summarized briefly in Tables 6
and 7.
From the data in Table 6, temperatures necessary for particulate trap
regeneration occur with maximum throttle at the lower engine speeds. Such
engine speeds, however, are not prevalent in the transient cycles for operation
on the engine or the chassis dynamometers. With maximum intake restriction,
as reported in Table 7, exhaust temperatures were significantly increased at
higher engine speeds. The intake restriction used in these evaluations, however,
would only be applicable at altitudes between sea level and 600 feet.
Additional intake restriction could be applied at the higher engine speeds,
provided means were applied to assure immediate decrease in intake restriction
at lower engine speeds.
23
-------
TABLE 6. SUMMARY OF THE STEADY-STATE EVALUATIONS AT
MAXIMUM TORQUE
Cummins NTC-*00 (CPL531)
Intake Restriction Set at 20" H^O at 2100 rpm
Speed,
rpm
700
900
1100
1300
1500
1700
1900
2100
Torque,
ft-lbs
655
10SO
12*5
1280
1230
1165
1090
995
BSFC,
Ib/hp-hr
0.**
0.47
0.38
0.36
0.35
0.33
0.35
0.36
Exhaust Temp., °C
Pre-Turbo Post-Turboa
570
760
810
730
6*0
590
575
550
*85
730
710
6*0
5*5
*90
*55
*35
Exhaust
Oxygen
% by Vol.
6.0
2.7
2.*
*.0
7.5
9.3
10.5
11.*
Speed,
rpm
1300
1500
1700
1900
2100
Torque,
ft-lbs
1280
1230
1165
1090
995
Undiluted Exhaust Emissions
HC. ppmC CO. ppm CO?. % NOV. ppm
**
83
75
63
62
3578
776
266
1*6
106
11.1
9.3
8.1
7.*
6.8
1935
2055
1905
1710
1*70
Speed,
rpm
900
1700
1900
2100
Torque,
ft-lbs
1130
1165
1085
1000
Emissions, g/hp-hr
BSFCb
HC
0.12
0.15
0.1*
0.15
CO CO
7.7
0.8
0.5
0.*
1.27
0.10
0.1*
0.13
Part. Meas. Calc.
0.**2
0.337
0.3*3
0.3*9
0.***
0.326
0.330
0.3*5
aMeasured two feet from exhaust outlet of the turbocharger.
^Measured using measured fuel consumption, and calculated using the
"carbon balance" method.
24
-------
TABLE 7. MAXIMUM TORQUE STEADY-STATE EVALUATIONS AT
MAXIMUM INTAKE RESTRICTION
Cummins NTC-400 (CPL 531)
Intake Restriction Set at 73" H20 at 2100 rpma
Speed,
rpm
700
900
1100
1300
1500
1700
1900
2100
Torque,
ft-lbs
650
1020
1226
1260
1230
1165
1095
1005
Exhaust Temp., °C
Pre-
Turbo
580
750
820
820
685
680
640
645
Post-
Turbo13
495
655
730
695
590
545
530
525
Exhaust
Oxygen,
% by Vol.
5.8
2.9
2.2
6.5
7.1
9.0
Exhaust Temp., °C
Max. - Std. Res.c
Pre- Post-
Turbo Turbob
10
-10
10
90
45
90
65
95
10
25
20
55
45
55
75
90
aMaximum restriction that does not result in turbocharger surge at
some engine operating condition (not necessarily at rated speed and load).
^Measured two feet from exhaust outlet of the turbocharger.
cDifference between the temperatures with maximum intake restriction
and with standard intake restriction.
In summary, engine operating conditions exist that provide the exhaust
temperatures necessary for regeneration of particulate traps. To enable taking
maximum advantage of such conditions, however, would require development of
a control system. Such a system could be significantly more complicated than
the simple control system desired for use in this work assignment. Under
normal operating conditions and configurations of the NTC-400 engine, exhaust
temperatures high enough to provide potential for particulate trap regeneration
occurred only in locations prior to the turbocharger.
C. Emissions Results of Transient Cycle Evaluations
Transient cycle evaluations were conducted in three configurations with
exhaust particulate traps and in three configurations without particulate traps.
Results of those evaluations are included in Appendix C and are summarized in
subsequent tables included in this section of the report.
Several of the exhaust system configurations evaluated are shown in
Figure 6. The configuration with two Corning particulate traps included a
bypass valve, and the entire system was installed between the engine exhaust
manifold and the turbocharger. The single Corning particulate trap was close-
25
-------
coupled to the exhaust manifold and the turbocharger to minimize system mass
and surface area; the bypass system was omitted. The Johnson Matthey
particulate trap was installed after the turbocharger. The other test
configurations included the standard engine configuration, replacement of the
two Corning traps with a single section of exhaust tubing (dummy trap), and the
bypass system operating in the bypass mode.
Results of the transient cycle emissions evaluations are summarized in
Tables 8 and 9, and are presented graphically in previous Figure 5. The hot-
start test accounts for 6/7 of the total composite value, and is therefore of
primary importance for all emissions, with the possible exception of HC. In
Figure 5, the data are presented in an order based on the work produced during
the cycle. The loss in cycle work in these evaluations appears to be primarily a
function of the total mass and surface area that was installed into the system
between the engine exhaust manifold and the turbocharger. For the baseline
and Johnson Matthey trap in a post-turbocharger location, the turbocharger was
mounted directly onto the exhaust manifold. With the other four configurations
evaluated, the mass installed between the exhaust manifold increases from left
to right on Figure 5 (i.e., the two Corning traps represent the maximum mass
configuration).
In general, CO increased and NOX decreased with a decrease in work
produced over the cycle. HC did not appear to be affected by exhaust system
configuration, other than the reduction with the catalyzed Johnson Matthey
particulate trap. Particulates produced by the engine increased with an
increase in cycle work (i.e., bypass and straight pipe configurations). Relative
to baseline particulates, the Corning trap(s) provided about an 85 percent
reduction and the Johnson Matthey trap provided about a fifty percent
reduction. Relative to the particulate production of the engine with the
Corning particulate trap(s) installed, the reduction in particulates was probably
somewhat greater than 85 percent (e.g., Corning trap relative to the bypass and
straight pipe). Fuel consumption (i.e., BSFC) increased with the relatively large
reductions in cycle work (i.e., one and two Corning traps).
D. Effect of Configurations on Engine Performance
Although evaluation of engine performance was not a direct requirement
in this work assignment, several observations regarding engine performance
appear to be of potential importance. However, no methods are known to be
available for directly relating these observations on the engine dynamometer to
vehicle driveability.
One factor is the effect of mass between the exhaust manifold and the
turbocharger on the time required to obtain effective operation of the
turbocharger. Another is the delay in turbocharger reaction during transient
operation. It is felt that by appropriate control of system design parameters
the effects on engine performance can be minimized; this is illustrated by the
improvement obtained with one Corning trap, compared with the results using
two traps. It appears that system mass and surface area have more effect than
the associated system resistance to exhaust flow.
26
-------
TABLE 8. SUMMARY OF RESULTS FOR HOT-START TRANSIENT TESTS
Emissions, g/hp-hr
Test
BL-0
INS-0
Configuration
Initial Baseline
Initial Baseline
Average
HC
0.38
0.44
0.4
CO
2.70
2.75
2.7
C02
595
594
595
NOy
6.21
6.41
6.3
Part.
—
BSFC,
Ib/hp-hr
0.416
0.415
0.42
Work,
hp-hr
26.7
26.5
26.6
BLW03
BLW04
BLW05
BLW06
In Bypass Mode
In Bypass Mode
In Bypass Mode
In Bypass Mode
Average
0.54
0.50
0.54
0.51
0.5
4.20
4.15
4.43
3.95
4.2
579
579
569
571
575
5.86
6.04
5.54
5.49
5.7
0.55
0.52
0.57
0.54
0.54
0.407
0.407
0.400
0.401
0.40
23.9
24.4
25.2
24.1
24.5
BLWT1 Two Corning Trapsa
BLWT2 Two Corning Traps3
BLWT3 Two Corning Trapsa
BLWT4 Two Corning Traps3
Average
0.46
0.41
0.49
0.52
0.5
5.48
5.49
5.54
5.36
5.5
640
624
641
620
630
5.04
5.20
5.21
5.15
5.2
0.07
0.06
0.08
0.08
0.07
0.450
0.439
0.451
0.436
0.44
19.8
20.0
20.0
20.4
20.0
BLDT2 Dummy Trap
0.51 4.52 564 5.22 0.59
0.397
23.9
RBL2 Baseline Check
0.56 3.44 560 6.02 0.42
0.393
25.8
BLST1 One Corning Trap 0.49 5.21 595 5.54 0.07
BLST2 One Corning Trap 0.43 5.01 567 5.34 0.06
Average 0.5 5.1 580 5.4 0.07
22.3
23.4
23.0
JMBL1 3M Trap
JMBL2 JM Trap
JMLT1 JM Trap Loaded
JMLT2 3M Trap Loaded
Average
0.09
0.08
0.04
0.06
0.07
3.50
3.59
3.69
4.08
3.7
573
577
574
579
575
5.71
6.00
6.00
6.08
6.0
0.20
0.19
0.22
0.24
0.21
0.401
0.403
0.402
0.405
0.40
25.5
25.5
25.5
25.2
25.5
FBL1 Final Baseline
FBL2 Final Baseline
Average
0.50 3.52 578 6.51 0.40 0.405 25.2
0.50 3.33 572 6.51 0.38 0.401 25.2
0.5 3.4 575 6.5 0.39 0.40 25.0
aln parallel.
27
-------
TABLE 9. SUMMARY OF RESULTS FOR COLD-START TRANSIENT TESTS
Emissions, g/hp-hr
Test
BL-1
BL-2
Configuration
Initial Baseline
Initial Baseline
Average
HC
1
1
1
.03
.02
.0
CO
3
3
3
.39
.80
.6
CO?
644
654
650
NOV
5
6
6
.77
.58
.2
Part.
0.60
0.54
0.57
BSFC,
0.452 25.2
0.462 25.6
0.46 25.5
BLW01 In Bypass Mode
BLW02 In Bypass Mode
Average
1.06 5.03 586 5.08
1.05 4.61 600 5.05
1.1 4.8 595 5.1
0.79 0.414 24.5
0.64 0.423 23.2
0.71 0.42 23.9
BLWT1 Two Corning Traps 1.16 6.31 676 4.85 0.18
0.477
18.8
BLDT1 Dummy Trap
1.06 5.41 596 4.83 0.73 0.421 22.9
RBL1 Baseline Check
1.03 3.75 581 5.45 0.51 0.409 25.2
JMBL1 JM Trap
0.42 4.07 607 5.53 0.28
0.426
24.9
Some maximum power data along with associated exhaust pressures are
given in Table 10. These data illustrate that at lower engine speeds the
installation of two Corning particulate traps between the exhaust manifold and
the turbocharger had a relatively large effect on the maximum power
attainable even at essentially steady-state operating conditions. Also, the
pressure drop across two Corning particulate traps in parallel is relatively low
in comparison with the total backpressure at the exhaust manifold.
TABLE 10. MAXIMUM POWER AND EXHAUST PRESSURES WITH
AND WITHOUT PARTICULATE TRAP
Engine
Speed,
rpm
1100
1300
1500
1700
1900
2100
Maximum Torque
ft-lb
w/o Trap With Trap3
1220 550b
1270 750b
1235 NDC
1165 1050
1095 1085
1010 995
Pressure
Trap A P, Ex
"H,0(»Hg)
6 (0.4)
8(0.6)
NDC
20(1.5)
25(1.8)
28(2.1)
. Man.,
"Hg
3
6
NDC
25
34
40
aTwo Corning particulate traps and bypass system
^Considerable time required to attain these conditions
cManifold temperature exceeded 800°C
28
-------
Again, discussion of engine performance has been based solely on
observations, since system optimization for best engine performance was not
included in this work assignment. It does appear, however, that system
optimization for best engine performance is an important criterion that should
be considered in decisions regarding the use of particulate traps in a pre-
turbocharger location.
E. Regeneration of Corning Particulate Traps
With the two Corning particulate traps, there was never any indication of
any regeneration having occurred during operation over the transient cycle with
either clean traps or with the traps loaded to two times initial differential
pressures. Regeneration in this configuration was conducted at a steady-state
engine speed of 1800 rpm with a torque setting producing a particulate trap
inlet temperature of 65QQC. This condition was held until the trap outlet
temperature reached 640°C. The differential pressure across the traps
returned to the initial clean differential pressure.
With the one clean Corning particulate trap installed between the exhaust
manifold and the turbocharger, differential pressure across the trap at an
engine speed of 2100 rpm with maximum power was 95 inches of water (with
two traps at essentially the same operating condition the differential pressure
was about 40 inches of water). After loading the trap to a differential pressure
of about 1.5 times the differential pressure with a clean trap, the differential
pressure was three to six percent lower following each of several transient
cycle tests. This series of evaluations is summarized as follows:
_ Operation and/or Condition
Clean Trap - 1800 rpm, 500 Torque
Map and Prep
Three Each Transient Cycles
1800 rpm, 500 Torque
1800 rpm, 500 Torque for 2.5 Hours
Transient Cycle
1800 rpm, 500 Torque
Transient Cycle
1800 rpm, 500 Torque
1800 rpm, 500 Torque for 1 Hour
Transient Cycle
1800 rpm, 500 Torque
1800 rpm, Torque to get 640°C
1800 rpm, 500 Torque
Temperature, °C
Exhaust Trap
Man. Out
490
780
490
490
780
490
780
490
490
780
490
640
490
480
570
480
480
570
480
570
480
480
570
480
640
480
Trap
"H70
54
61
75
73
70
80
75
56
aDif ferential pressure
29
-------
These results indicate that some limited amount of regeneration was occurring
during operation over the transient cycle. The portions of the transient cycle
producing the higher exhaust temperatures are shown in Figure 7. As shown
from the data on the figure, the time at elevated temperatures is relatively
short.
In summary, some limited amount of regeneration occurred during
operation over the transient cycle with one Corning particulate trap close-
connected to the exhaust manifold. By design optimization of the system, along
with some modification in engine operation to obtain slightly higher
temperatures, effective regeneration during the transient cycle should be
attainable.
F. Regeneration of the Johnson Matthey Particulate Trap
The Johnson Matthey Number CTO-JM 13/VI particulate trap designed for
heavy-duty applications was installed into the exhaust system downstream of
the turbocharger. The sequence of operation with this trap was as shown on the
following page.
As indicated from these data, no regeneration occurred during operation
over the transient cycle. In steady-state operation, regeneration was not
initiated below a trap inlet temperature of 630°C along with a trap outlet
temperature of 520°C.
Suifate analyses were conducted using the samples collected on the ninety
millimeter Pallflex particulate filters (see note below tabulation). Results of
these sulfate analyses aree summarized as follows:
Test Cycle Configuration Part. Sul.a
RBLC1 Cold Baseline 13 1.0
RBLH1 Hot Baseline 10 0.9
JMBLC Cold JM 13/VI Trap 7 0.4
JMBLH Hot JM 13/VI Trap 5 0.3
aPallflex, rather than Fluoropore, filters were used for these analyses.
30
-------
Vertical - 0 to 1000°C
Horizontal - 5 diy/min
ManifoJ-d Temperature
Filter Outlet Temperature
Figure 7. Maximum exhaust temperature during transient cycle
with one Corning particulate trap
-------
Based on these data, sulfate emissions were lower with the Johnson Matthey
trap installed, than with the baseline exhaust configuration.
Operation and/or Condition
1800 rpm, 500 Torque
2100 rpm, 1015 Torque
1800 rpm, 500 Torque
Power Map and Prep
Two Transient Cycles
1800 rpm, 500 Torque
Transient Cycle
1800 rpm, 500 Torque
1800 rpm, 500 Torque for 1.2 hours
Two Transient Cycles
1800 rpm, 500 Torque
1800 rpm, 1000 Torque
1800 rpm, 500 Torque
1300 rpm, 1100 Torque
1300 rpm, 1200 Torque
1800 rpm, 500 Torque
1800 rpm, 500 Torque for 1.8 hours
Transient Cycle
1800 rpm, 500 Torque
1300 rpm, 1000 Torque
1300 rpm, 1200 Torque
1800 rpm, 500 Torque
Trap
AP,
"H?0
20
57
22
—
—
25
—
27
40
--
44
—
45
GDa
RDb
25
42
—
40
GDa
RDb
22
Exhaust TemD.. 2C
Man.
490
625
490
730
610
475
610
485
500
630
480
650
510
730
750
490
510
630
485
700
740
460
Trap
Inlet
420
505
425
640
470
400
470
410
440
490
410
545
480
650
670
440
440
495
425
630
660
405
Trap
Outlet
370
480
400
470
360
300
370
330
390
375
300
480
435
550
595
460
390
370
355
520
580
360
^Gradual decrease began
kRapid decrease
32
-------
REFERENCES
1. Federal Register, "Gaseous Emission Regulations for 1984 and Later
Model Year Heavy-Duty Engines," Part II, Vol. 45, No. 14, January 21,
1980.
2. Federal Register, "Control of Air Pollution from New Motor Vehicles and
New Motor Vehicle Engines; Particulate Regulation for Heavy-Duty
Diesel Engines," Proposed Rules Part III, Vol. 46, No. 4, January 7, 1981.
3. France, C.J., et al, "Recommended Practice for Determining Exhaust
Emissions from Heavy-Duty Vehicles under Transient Conditions,"
Technical Report SDSB 79-80, Environmental Protection Agency, Ann
Arbor, MI. The cycle was subsequently included in the Federal Register,
"Evaporative Emission Regulation and Test Procedure for 1985 and Later
Model Year Gasoline-Fueled Heavy-Duty Vehicles; Final Rule" Part IV,
Vol. 48, No. 8, January 12, 1983.
4. Howitt, J.S. and Montierth, M.R., "Cellular Ceramic Diesel Particulate
Filter," SAE Paper 810114 presented at the International Congress and
Exposition, Cobo Hall, Detroit, Michigan, February 23-27, 1981.
5. Wade, W.R., White, J.E., and Florek, J.J., "Diesel Particulate Trap
Regeneration Techniques," SAE Paper 810118 presented at the
International Congress and Exposition, Cobo Hall, Detroit, Michigan,
February 23-27, 1981.
6. Urban, C.M., Landman, L.C., and Wagner, R.D., "Diesel Car Particulate
Control Methods," SAE Paper 830083 presented at the International
Congress and Exposition, Detroit, Michigan, February 28-March 4, 1983.
-------
APPENDICES
A. ENGINE BASELINE EVALUATIONS
B. PARTICULATE TRAP BYPASS SYSTEM
C. EXHAUST PARTICULATE TRAP RESULTS
-------
APPENDIX A
ENGINE BASELINE EVALUATIONS
A-2 through A-5 Computer Printouts of Transient Evaluations
A-6 through A-10 Summaries of Steady-State Evaluations
A-ll through A-15 Computer Printouts of Steady-State
Evaluations
-------
TABLE
ENGINE NO.
ENGINE MODEL
ENGINE 0.0 L(
CVS NO. 10
83 CUMMINS NTC-400
0. CIO)
BAROMETER 739.65 MM HGC29.12 IN HG)
DRY BULB TEMP. 25.0 DEG C(77.0 DEG F)
BAG RESULTS
BAG NUMBER
TIME SECONDS
TOTAL FLOW STD. CU. METRES(SCF)
HC SAMPLE
HC BCKGRD
CO SAMPLE
CO BCKGRD
C02 SAMPLE
C02 BCKGRD
NOX SAMPLE
NOX BCKGRD
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PCT
METER/RANGE/PCT
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
f HC CONCENTRATION PPM
o CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
C02 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
FUEL KG (LB)
KW HR (HP HR)
BSHC G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSCO G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSC02 G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSNOX G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSFC KG/KW HR (LB/HP HR)
TOTAL TEST RESULTS 1 BAGS
TOTAL KW HR (HP HR)
BSHC G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSCO G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSC02 G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSNOX G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
18.78 ( 25.19)
1.38 ( 1.03)
4.55 ( 3.39)
864. ( 644.)
7.74 ( 5.77)
ENGINE EMISSION RESULTS
C-TRANS.
TEST BL-1 RUN1
DATE 12/ 2/83
TIME
DYNO NO. 5
PROJECT NO. 05-7338-003
BASELINE ENGINE
DIESEL EM-528-F
BAG CART NO. 1
RELATIVE HUMIDITY
ENGINE-56. PCT
CVS-60. PCT
ABSOLUTE HUMIDITY 11.4 GM/KG( 80.1 GRAINS/LB)
1199.0
«»**» (38208.)
NOX HUMIDITY C.F. 1.0000
50.3/22/
9.5/ 2/
73.8/13/
2.2/13/
88. 7/1 1/
8. 7/1 I/
70.9/ 2/
.7/ 2/
15.22
41.
68.
.82
70.2
25.86
85.49
16226.8
145.36
5.166
18.78
1.38
4.55
863.85
7.74
.275
50.
10.
72.
2.
.87
.05
71.
1.
1 1
25
1
3
644
( 5
(
.39)
.19)
.03)
.39)
.18)
.77)
452)
PARTICULATE RESULTS, TOTAL FOR 1 BAGS
90MM PARTICULATE RATES
GRAMS/TEST
G/KWHR(G/HPHR)
G/KG FUEL (G/LB FUEL)
FILTER EFF.
15.01
.80 ( .60)
2.91 ( 1.32)
96.1
BSFC KG/KW HR (LB/HP HR) .275 ( .452)
-------
TABLE
ENGINE NO.
ENGINE MODEL
ENGINE 0.0 L(
CVS NO. 10
83 CUMMINS NTC-400
0. CID)
BAROMETER 751.08 MM H6(29.57 IN HG)
DRY BULB TEMP. 23.9 DEG C(75.0 DEG F)
BAG RESULTS
BAG NUMBER
TIME SECONDS
TOTAL FLOW STD. CU. METRES(SCF)
HC
HC
CO
CO
SAMPLE
BCKGRD
SAMPLE
BCKGRD
C02 SAMPLE
CO2 BCKGRD
NOX SAMPLE
NOX BCKGRD
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PCT
METER/RANGE/PCT
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
> HC CONCENTRATION PPM
' CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
C02 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
FUEL KG (LB)
KW HR (HP HR)
BSHC G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSCO G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSC02 G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSNOX G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSFC KG/KW HR (LB/HP HR)
TOTAL TEST RESULTS 1 BAGS
TOTAL KW HR (HP HR)
BSHC G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSCO G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSC02 G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSNOX G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSFC KG/KW HR (LB/HP HR)
19.08 ( 25.59)
1.37 ( 1.02)
5.10 ( 3.80)
( 658.)
6.58)
883.
8.82 (
.281 (
ENGINE EMISSION RESULTS
C-TRANS.
TEST BL-2 RUN1
DATE 12/ 7/83
TIME
DYNO NO. 5
PROJECT NO. 05-7338-003
BASELINE ENGINE
DIESEL EM-528-F
BAG CART NO. 1
RELATIVE HUMIDITY
ABSOLUTE HUMIDITY
1199.0
***»* (39083.)
, ENGINE-51. PCT , CVS-24. PCT
9.5 GM/KG( 66.3 GRAINS/LB) NOX HUMIDITY C.F. 1.0000
47.7/22/
7.4/ 2/
82.7/13/
5.6/13/
89.3/11/
8.2/1 I/
80.I/ 2/
.6/ 2/
15.05
41.
75.
.83
79.5
26.05
97.29
16846.0
168.37
5.366 (
19.08 (
48.
7.
82.
5.
.88
.05
80.
1.
11.83)
25.59)
1.37 ( 1.02)
5.10 ( 3.80)
882.80 ( 658.31)
8.82 ( 6.58)
;281 ( .462)
PARTICULATE RESULTS, TOTAL FOR 1 BAGS
90MM PARTICULATE RATES
GRAMS/TEST
G/KWHR(G/HPHR)
G/KG FUEL (G/LB FUEL)
FILTER EFF.
13.70
.72 ( .54)
2.55 ( 1.16)
95.8
.462)
-------
TABLE
ENGINE NO.
ENGINE MODEL
ENGINE 0.0 L(
CVS NO. 10
83 CUMMINS NTC-400
0. CID)
BAROMETER 745.49 MM HG(29.35 IN HG)
DRY BULB TEMP. 25.6 DEG C(78.0 DEC F)
BAG RESULTS
BAG NUMBER
TIME SECONDS
TOTAL FLOW STD. CU. METRES(SCF)
HC SAMPLE
HC BCKGRD
CO SAMPLE
CO BCKGRD
C02 SAMPLE
CO2 BCKGRD
NOX SAMPLE
NOX BCKGRD
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PCT
METER/RANGE/PCT
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
> CO CONCENTRATION PPM
i C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
C02 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
FUEL KG (LB)
KW HR (HP HR)
BSHC G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSCO G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSC02 G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSNOX G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSFC KG/KW HR (LB/HP HR)
TOTAL TEST RESULTS 1 BAGS
TOTAL KW HR (HP HR)
BSHC G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSCO G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSC02 G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSNOX G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
19.87 ( 26.65)
.50 ( .38)
3.62 ( 2.70)
797. ( 595.)
8.33 ( 6.21)
ENGINE EMISSION RESULTS
H-TRANS.
TEST BL-0 RUN1
DATE 12/ 1/83
TIME
DYNO NO. 5
PROJECT NO. 05-7338-003
BASELINE ENGINE
DIESEL EM-528-F
BAG CART NO. 1
RELATIVE HUMIDITY , ENGINE-45. PCT , CVS-66. PCT
ABSOLUTE HUMIDITY 9.4 GM/KG( 65.8 GRAINS/LB) NOX HUMIDITY C.F. 1.0000
1199.0
*»*»« (38623.)
24
9
61
87
11
79
.3/22/
.O/ 21
.8/13/
.8/13/
.8/11/
.0/1 I/
.9/ 21
.8/ 21
15.53
16.
56.
.79
79.2
10.00
71.91
15848.2
165.57
5.024
19.87
.50
3.62
797.48
8.33
.253
24.
9.
59.
1.
.85
.07
80.
1.
( 11
( 26
(
( 2
( 594
( 6
(
.08)
.65)
.38)
.70)
.68)
.21)
416)
BSFC KG/KW HR (LB/HP HR) .253 ( .416)
-------
TABLE
ENGINE EMISSION RESULTS
H-TRANS.
PROJECT NO. 05-7338-003
ENGINE NO.
ENGINE MODEL
ENGINE 0.0 L(
CVS NO. 10
83 CUMMINS NTC-400
0. CID)
BAROMETER 744.98 MM HG(29.33 IN HG)
DRY BULB TEMP. 22.8 DEG C(73.0 DEG F)
BAG RESULTS
BAG NUMBER
TIME SECONDS
TOTAL FLOW STD. CU. METRES(SCF)
HC SAMPLE
HC BCKGRD
CO SAMPLE
CO BCKGRD
C02 SAMPLE
C02 BCKGRD
NOX SAMPLE
NOX BCKGRD
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PCT
METER/RANGE/PCT
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
> C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
uh NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
C02 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
FUEL KG (LB)
KW HR (HP HR)
BSHC G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSCO G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSC02 G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSNOX G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSFC KG/KW HR (LB/HP HR)
TOTAL TEST RESULTS 1 BAGS
TOTAL KW HR (HP HR)
BSHC G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSCO G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSC02 G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSNOX G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
19.76 ( 26.50)
.59 ( .44)
3.69 ( 2.75)
797. ( 594.)
8.59 ( 6.41)
TEST
DATE
TIME
DYNO NO.
INS-0 RUN1
12/ 1/83
RELATIVE HUMIDITY
ABSOLUTE HUMIDITY
1199.0
**»»» (38636.)
INSULATED MANIFOLD
DIESEL EM-528-F
BAG CART NO. 1
, ENGINE-49. PCT , CVS-44. PCT
8.7 GM/KG( 60.6 GRAINS/LB) NOX HUMIDITY C.F. 1.0000
24.1/22/ 24.
6.0/ 21 6.
62.1/13/ 60.
.8/13/ 1.
86. 7/1 I/ .84
9.2/11/ .06
81. 7/ 2/ 82.
.6/ 2/ 1.
15.83
19.
57.
.79
81.1
11.68
72.87
15741.2
169.78
4.993 ( 11
19.76 ( 26
.59 (
3.69 ( 2
796.58 ( 594
8.59 ( 6
.253 (
.01)
.50)
.44)
.75)
.01)
.41)
415)
BSFC KG/KW HR (LB/HP HR) .253 ( .415)
-------
EXHAUST TEMPERATURE AND OXYGEN MAP AT STANDARD CONDITIONS
Cummins NTC-400 (CPL531)
Intake Restriction Set at 20"H20 at 2100 rpm
Exhaust Temp . ,
Speed ,
rpm
700
700
700
700
900
900
900
900
1100
1100
1100
1100
1300
1300
1300
1300
1500
1500
1500
1500
1700
1700
1700
1700
1900
1900
1900
1900
2100
2100
2100
2100
Torque ,
ft-lbs
380
510
580
655
460
620
700
1080
595
800
905
1245
750
1000
1125
1280
730
965
1090
1230
700
925
1040
1165
660
880
990
1090
600
800
900
995
Fuel,
Ib/hr
20
27
33
38
28
40
45
88
44
60
74
98
67
90
101
113
73
93
106
122
78
104
114
125
88
112
125
137
90
116
130
143
BSFC,
Ib/hp-hr
0.39
0.40
0.42
0.44
0.36
0.37
0.38
0.47
0.35
0.36
0.39
0.38
0.36
0.36
0.36
0.36
0.35
0.34
0.34
0.35
0.35
0.35
0.34
0.33
0.37
0.35
0.35
0.35
0.37
0.36
0.36
0.36
3.
Pre-Turbo
380
460
520
570
450
520
570
760
560
645
695
810
570
650
700
730
535
585
605
640
510
550
565
590
480
520
545
575
465
510
530
550
Post-Turbo
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
515
585
625
—
—
—
625
—
—
—
545
—
—
—
485
—
—
—
450
—
—
—
425
~™
°C
Two Feet ,
from Turbo
330
390
440
485
400
445
485
730
500
560
600
710
510
575
610
640
480
510
535
545
445
465
475
490
400
425
445
455
385
410
420
435
Exhaust
Oxygen ,
% by Vol
11.4
8.8
7.5
6.0
9.6
8.4
7.3
2.7
8.2
6.0
5.0
2.4
8.3
5.9
4.8
4.0
10.3
8.5
8.0
7.5
11.5
10.1
9.8
9.3
12.5
11.5
11.0
10.5
13.3
12.3
11.9
11.4
Average of front and rear exhaust bank; temperature difference was less
than 10°C (18°F). Insulating an exhaust bank increased temperatures by
less than 10°C (18°F) at nominal speeds and torques.
With exhaust pipe uninsulated
A-6
-------
EXHAUST TEMPERATURE AND OXYGEN MAP AT STANDARD CONDITIONS
Cummins NTC-400 (CPL531)
Intake Restriction Set at 20"H20 at 2100 rpm
Exhaust Temp.,°F
Speed,
rpm
700
700
700
700
900
900
900
900
1100
1100
1100
1100
1300
1300
1300
1300
1500
1500
1500
1500
1700
1700
1700
1700
1900
1900
1900
1900
2100
2100
2100
2100
Torque ,
ft-lbs
380
510
580
655
460
620
700
1080
595
800
905
1245
750
1000
1125
1280
730
965
1090
1230
700
925
1040
1165
660
880
990
1090
600
800
900
995
Fuel,
Ib/hr
20
27
33
38
28
40
45
88
44
60
74
98
67
90
101
113
73
93
106
122
78
104
114
125
88
112
125
137
90
116
130
143
BSFC,
lb/hp-hr
0.39
0.40
0.42
0.44
0.36
0.37
0.38
0.47
0.35
0.36
0.39
0.38
0.36
0.36
0.36
0.36
0.35
0.34
0.34
0.35
0.35
0.35
0.34
0.33
0.37
0.35
0.35
0.35
0.37
0.36
0.36
0.36
Pre -Turbo Post -Turbo
716
860
968
1058
842
968
1058
1400
1040 959
1193 1085
1283 1157
1490
1058
1202
1292 1157
1346
995
1085
1121 1013
1184
950
1022
1049 905
1094
896
968
1013 842
1067
869
950
986 797
1022
Two Feet ,
Q
from Turbo
626
734
824
905
752
833
905
1346
932
1040
1112
1310
950
1067
1130
1184
896
950
995
1013
833
869
887
914
752
797
833
851
725
770
788
815
Average of front and rear exhaust bank; temperature difference was less
than 10°C (18°F). Insulating an exhaust bank increased temperatures by
less than 10°C (18°F) at nominal speeds and torques.
With exhaust pipe uninsulated
A-7
-------
EXHAUST EMISSION MEASUREMENTS FROM THE MAP AT STANDARD CONDITIONS
Cummins NTC-400 (CPL531)
Intake Restriction Set at 20"H20 at 2100 rpm
Undiluted Exhaust Emissions
Speed ,
rpm
700
700
700
700
900
900
900
900
1100
1100
1100
1100
1300
1300
1300
1300
1500
1500
1500
1500
1700
1700
1700
1700
1900
1900
1900
1900
2100
2100
2100
2100
Torque ,
ft-lbs
380
510
580
655
460
620
700
1080
595
800
905
1245
750
1000
1125
1280
730
965
1090
1230
700
925
1040
1165
660
880
990
1090
600
800
900
995
Fuel,
Ib/hr
20
27
33
38
28
40
45
38
44
60
74
98
67
90
101
113
73
93
106
122
78
104
114
125
88
112
125
137
90
116
130
143
BSFC,
Ib/hp-hr
0.39
0.40
0.42
0.44
0.36
0.37
0.38
0.47
0.35
0.36
0.39
0.38
0.36
0.36
0.36
0.36
0.35
0.34
0.34.
0.35
0.35
0.35
0.34
0.33
0.37
0.35
0.35
0.35
0.37
0.36
0.36
0.36
HC,
ppmC
—
—
—
— —
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
62
48
43
44
64
66
70
83
54
65
67
75
60
60
59
63
59
59
59
62
CO,
ppm
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
665
1675
2664
3578
286
446
582
776
88
212
226
266
119
119
119
146
106
106
119
106
C02,
%
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
8.89
10.42
10.90
11.14
7.44
8.58
8.99
9.31
6.57
7.71
7.81
8.09
6.16
6.91
7.17
7.44
5.53
6.32
6.57
6.82
NOX,
ppm
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
— —
—
—
—
—
1275
1665
1800
1935
1170
1605
1830
2055
990
1440
1650
1905
2535
1230
1485
1710
2190
1065
1260
1470
Average of front and rear exhaust bank; temperature difference was less
than 10°C (18°F). Insulating an exhaust bank increased temperatures by
less than 10°C (18°F) at nominal speeds and torques.
With exhaust pipe uninsulated
A-8
-------
MODAL GASEOUS AND PARTICULATE EMISSIONS DATA
Measured
Speed,
rpm
900
1300
1700
1900
2100
Torque ,
ft-lb
1130
1278
1164
1086
1000
Fuel,
Ib/hr
85.5
115.0
127.0
134.6
139.6
BSFC,
Ib/hp-hr
0.442
0.364
0.337
0.343
0.349
Emissions,
HC
0.12
0.07a
0.15
0.14
0.15
CO
7.7
7.7a
0.8
0.5
0.4
C02
629
503a
470
475
497
g/hp-hr
NOX
6.3
9.6a
10.6
10.2
10.2
Part.
1.27
0.22a
0.10
0.14
0.13
Measured
> Speed,
.], rpm
900
1300
1700
1900
2100
Torque ,
N*m
1532
1733
1578
1475
1356
Fuel,
kg/hr
38.8
52.2
57.6
61.1
63.3
BSFC,
kg/kW-hr
269
221
205
208
212
Emissions,
HC
0.15
o.ioa
0.20
0.18
0.21
CO
10.4
10. 4a
1.1
0.7
0.5
C02
843
674a
630
636
666
g/kW-hr
NOX
8.5
12. 9d
14.2
13.7
13.7
Part.
1.70
0.29a
0.13
0.18
0.18
C.B.
BSFC,
Ib/hp-hr
0.444
0.357a
0.326
0.330
0.345
C.B.
SFC,
kg/kW-hr
0.270
0.2173
0.199
0.200
0.210
Data adjusted based on average difference between measured and
carbon balance (C.B.) BSFC for the other four engine speeds.
-------
EXHAUST TEMPERATURE AND OXYGEN WITH INTAKE RESTRICTION
Cummins NTC-400 (CPL531)
Intake Restriction Set at Maximum - 73"^0 at 2100 rpm
Exhaust Temp., °C
Exhaust Temp., °C
Max.-Std. Restriction
Speed,
rpm
700
700
700
700
900
900
900
900
1100
1100
1100
1100
1300
1300
1300
1300
1500
1500
1500
1500
1700
1700
1700
1700
1900
1900
1900
1900
2100
2100
2100
2100
Torque ,
ft-lbs
380
510
580
650
460
620
700
1020
600
805
905
1226
745
1000
1135
1260
730
980
1095
1230
700
925
1040
1165
660
880
990
1095
600
800
900
1005
Fuel,
Ib/hr
19
28
32
37
28
40
46
88
44
63
72
98
66
89
101
112
73
93
105
120
79
102
117
127
86
111
124
137
93
115
125
143
Pre- Turbo
410
485
530
580
460
530
570
750
570
665
710
820
630
720
775
820
565
635
660
685
570
620
640
680
540
590
610
640
520
585
615
645
Two Feet
from Turbob
370
420
450
495
410
455
490
655
505
570
615
730
550
615
665
695
510
570
580
590
490
510
530
545
465
490
505
530
445
485
505
525
Oxygen ,
% by Vol
10.7
8.3
7.3
5.8
9.4
8.2
7.3
2.9
8.0
5.8
4.8
2.2
6.5
4.3
3.0
2.4
9.8
7.8
7.0
6.5
10.1
8.6
7.7
7.1
11.5
10.0
9.5
9.0
12.3
10.8
10.0
9.4
Pre -Turbo
30
25
10
10
10
10
0
-10
10
20
15
10
60
70
75
90
30
50
55
45
60
70
75
90
60
70
65
65
55
75
85
95
Two Feet
from Turbo
40
30
10
10
10
10
5
25
5
10
15
20
40
40
55
55
30
40
55
45
45
45
55
55
65
65
60
75
60
75
85
90
.Average of temperatures for front and rear exhaust banks
Exhaust pipe without insulation
A-10
-------
TABLE
ENGINE NO.
ENGINE MODEL
ENGINE 0.0 L(
CVS NO. 10
83 CUMMINS NTC-400
0. CID)
BAROMETER 748.54 MM HG(29.47 IN HG)
DRY BULB TEMP. 22.8 DEG CC73.0 OEG F)
BAG RESULTS
BAG NUMBER
TIME SECONDS
TOTAL FLOW STD. CU. METRES(SCF)
SAMPLE
BCKGRD
SAMPLE
BCKGRD
C02 SAMPLE
C02 BCKGRD
NOX SAMPLE
NOX BCKGRD
HC
HC
CO
CO
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PCT
METER/RANGE/PCT
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
7 CO CONCENTRATION PPM
M C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
H NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
C02 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
FUEL KG (LB)
KW HR (HP HR)
BSHC G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSCO G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSC02 G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSNOX G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSFC KG/KW HR (LB/HP HR)
TOTAL TEST RESULTS 1 BAGS
TOTAL KW HR (HP HR )
BSHC G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSCO G/KW HR (G/HP HR )
BSC02 G/KW HR (G/HP HR )
BSNOX G/KW HR (G/HP HR )
BSFC KG/KW HR (LB/HP HR )
13.75 ( 18.44)
.15 ( .12)
10.38 ( 7.74)
843. ( 629.)
8.47 ( 6.32)
.270 ( .444)
ENGINE EMISSION RESULTS
900 RPM
TEST 900-1 RUN1
DATE 12/19/83
TIME
DYNO NO. 5
PROJECT NO. 05-7338-003
DIESEL EM-528-F
BAG CART NO. 1
RELATIVE HUMIDITY
ABSOLUTE HUMIDITY
359.6
821.6 (29019.)
12.0/ 2/ 12.
8.0/ 21 8.
68.5/12/ 155.
1.4/12/ 3.
85.1/11/ .81
7.8/11/ .05
74.7/ 2/ 75.
.6/ 2/ 1.
, ENGINE-51. PCT , CVS-18. PCT
8.9 GM/KG( 62.2 GRAINS/LB) NOX HUMIDITY C.F. 1.0000
16.13
4.
149.
.77
74.1
2.13
142.72
11593.3
116.52
3.715 (
13.75 <
.15 (
10.38 1
843.11 I
8.47 1
.270 (
: 8.19)
I 18.44)
! .12)
; 7.74)
: 628.71)
! 6.32)
[ .444)
PARTICULATE RESULTS, TOTAL FOR 1 BAGS
90MM PARTICULATE RATES
GRAMS/TEST
G/KWHR(G/HPHR)
G/KG FUEL (G/LB FUEL)
FILTER EFF.
23.41
1.70 ( 1.27)
6.30 ( 2.86)
97.4
-------
TABLE
ENGINE NO.
ENGINE MODEL
ENGINE 0.0 L(
CVS NO. 10
0 CUMMINS NTC-400
0. CID)
BAROMETER 746.51 MM HG(29.39 IN HG)
DRY BULB TEMP. 20.0 DEG C(68.0 DEG F)
BAG RESULTS
BAG NUMBER
TIME SECONDS
TOTAL FLOW STD. CU. METRES(SCF)
HC SAMPLE
HC BCKGRD
CO SAMPLE
CO BCKGRD
CO2 SAMPLE
C02 BCKGRD
NOX SAMPLE
NOX BCKGRD
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PCT
METER/RANGE/PCT
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
> HC CONCENTRATION PPM
' CO CONCENTRATION PPM
M C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
C02 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
FUEL KG (LB)
KW HR (HP HR)
BSHC G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSCO G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSC02 G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSNOX G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSFC KG/KW HR (LB/HP HR)
TOTAL TEST RESULTS 1 BAGS
TOTAL KW HR (HP HR)
BSHC G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSCO G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSC02 G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSNOX G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
32.71 <
.08 (
8.48 (
553. (
10.57 (
43.87)
.06)
6.32)
413.)
7.88)
ENGINE EMISSION RESULTS
1300 RPM
TEST 1300-1 RUN1
DATE 12/19/83
TIME
DYNO NO. 5
PROJECT NO. 05-7338-003
DIESEL EM-528-F
BAG CART NO. 1
RELATIVE HUMIDITY
ABSOLUTE HUMIDITY
499.9
«»*** (40214.)
11.57 27 12.
8.07 27 8.
88.1/12/ 215.
.3/12/ 1.
91.4/tl/ .91
7.5/11/ .04
53.0/ 3/ 159.
.I/ 3/ 0.
, ENGINE-59. PCT , CVS-21. PCT
8.8 GM/KG( 61.4 GRAINS/LB) NOX HUMIDITY C.F. 1.0000
14.37
4.
209.
.87
158.7
2.66
277.42
18106.2
345.70
5.828 1
32.71 1
.08 (
8.48 1
553.47 1
10.57 1
.178 1
[ 12.85)
[ 43.87)
! .06)
I 6.32)
I 412.73)
[ 7.88)
I .293)
PARTICULATE RESULTS, TOTAL FOR 1 BAGS
90MM PARTICULATE RATES
GRAMS/TEST
G/KWHR(G/HPHR)
G/KG FUEL (G/LB FUEL)
FILTER EFF.
7.75
.24 ( .18)
1.33 ( .60)
94.4
BSFC KG/KW HR (LB/HP HR) .178 ( .293)
-------
TABLE
ENGINE NO.
ENGINE MODEL
ENGINE 0.0 L(
CVS NO. 10
83 CUMMINS NTC-400
0. CID)
BAROMETER 746.25 MM HG(29.38 IN HG)
DRY BULB TEMP. 19.4 DEC C(67.0 DEG F)
BAG RESULTS
BAG NUMBER
TIME SECONDS
TOTAL FLOW STD. CU. METRES(SCF)
SAMPLE
BCKGRD
SAMPLE
BCKGRD
C02 SAMPLE
C02 BCKGRD
NOX SAMPLE
NOX BCKGRD
HC
HC
CO
CO
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PCT
METER/RANGE/PCT
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
> HC CONCENTRATION PPM
' CO CONCENTRATION PPM
oo CO2 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
C02 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
FUEL KG (LB)
KW HR (HP HR)
BSHC G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSCO G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSC02 G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSNOX G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSFC KG/KW HR (LB/HP HR)
TOTAL TEST RESULTS 1 BAGS
TOTAL KW HR (HP HR)
BSHC G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSCO G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSC02 G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSNOX G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
47.19 ( 63.28)
.20 ( .15)
1.08 ( .81)
630. ( 470.)
14.16 ( 10.56)
ENGINE EMISSION RESULTS
1700 RPM
TEST 1700-1 RUN1
DATE 12/19/83
TIME
DYNO NO. 5
PROJECT NO. 05-7338-003
DIESEL EM-528-F
BAG CART NO. 1
RELATIVE HUMIDITY
ABSOLUTE HUMIDITY
, ENGINE-59. PCT , CVS-19. PCT
8.5 GM/KG( 59.3 GRAINS/LB) NOX HUMIDITY C.F. 1.0000
605.9
««»*» (48831.)
18.9/ 2/ 19.
8.0/ 2/ 8.
36.1/13/ 33.
.8/13/ 1.
66.9/ 3/ 1.20
2.0/ 3/ .03
84.4/ 3/ 253.
.2/ 3/ 1.
11.11
12.
32.
1.17
252.7
9.27
51.19
29712.6
668.19
9.369 ( 20.65)
47.19 ( 63.28)
.20 ( .15)
1.08 ( .81)
629.67 ( 469.54)
14.16 ( 10.56)
.199 ( .326)
PARTICULATE RESULTS, TOTAL FOR 1 BAGS
90MM PARTICULATE RATES
GRAMS/TEST
G/KWHR(G/HPHR)
G/KG FUEL (G/LB FUEL)
FILTER EFF.
6.07
.13 ( .10)
.65 ( .29)
93.4
BSFC KG/KW HR (LB/HP HR) .199 ( .326)
-------
T* LE
ENGINE EMISSION RESULTS
1900 RPM
PROJECT NO. 05-7338-003
ENGINE NO.
ENGINE MODEL
ENGINE 0.0 L(
CVS NO. 10
0 CUMMINS NTC-400
0. CID)
BAROMETER 746.76 MM HG(29.40 IN HG)
DRY BULB TEMP. 20.0 DEG C(68.0 DEG F)
BAG RESULTS
BAG NUMBER
TIME SECONDS
TOTAL FLOW STD. CU. METRES(SCF)
SAMPLE
BCKGRD
SAMPLE
BCKGRD
SAMPLE
C02 BCKGRD
NOX SAMPLE
NOX BCKGRD
HC
HC
CO
CO
CO 2
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PCT
METER/RANGE/PCT
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
> HC CONCENTRATION PPM
I CO CONCENTRATION PPM
^ C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
C02 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
FUEL KG (LB)
KW HR (HP HR)
BSHC G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSCO G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSC02 G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSNOX G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSFC KG/KW HR (LB/HP HR)
TOTAL TEST RESULTS 1 BAGS
TOTAL KW HR (HP HR )
BSHC G/KW HR (G/HP HR )
BSCO G/KW HR (G/HP HR )
BSC02 G/KW HR (G/HP HR )
BSNOX G/KW HR (G/HP HR )
BSFC KG/KW HR (LB/HP HR )
48.96 I
.18
.68
636.
13.67
.200
65.65)
.14)
.51)
475.)
10.20)
.330)
TEST 1900 RUN1
DATE 12/19/83
TIME
DYNO NO. 5
RELATIVE HUMIDITY ,
ABSOLUTE HUMIDITY
1
600.1
*»*»« (48319.)
18.6/ 2/ 19.
8.0/ 2/ 8.
24.4/13/ 22.
.7/13/ 1.
71.I/ 3/ 1.29
3.I/ 3/ .05
85.8/ 3/ 257.
.6/ 3/ 2.
10.38
11.
21.
1.24
255.8
8.97
33.50
31159.6
669.35
9.814 (
DIESEL EM-528-F
BAG CART NO. 1
, ENGINE-61. PCT , CVS-21. PCT
9.0 GM/KGC 63.0 GRAINS/LB) NOX HUMIDITY C.F. 1.0000
48.96 (
21.64)
65.65)
.18 ( .14)
.68 ( .51)
636.49 ( 474.63)
10.20)
13.67 (
.200 (
.330)
PARTICULATE RESULTS, TOTAL FOR 1 BAGS
90MM PARTICULATE RATES
GRAMS/TEST
G/KWHR(G/HPHR)
G/KG FUEL (G/LB FUEL)
FILTER EFF.
8.87
.18 { .14)
.90 ( .41)
94.1
-------
TABLE
ENGINE NO.
ENGINE MODEL
ENGINE 0.0 L(
CVS NO. 10
0 CUMMINS NTC-400
0. CID)
BAROMETER 746.51 MM HG(29.39 IN HG)
DRY BULB TEMP. 18.9 DEC C(66.0 DEC F)
BAG RESULTS
BAG NUMBER
TIME SECONDS
TOTAL FLOW STD. CU. METRES(SCF)
SAMPLE
BCKGRD
SAMPLE
BCKGRD
C02 SAMPLE
CO2 BCKGRD
NOX SAMPLE
NOX BCKGRD
HC
HC
CO
CO
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PCT
METER/RANGE/PCT
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
> HC CONCENTRATION PPM
L CO CONCENTRATION PPM
-" C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
C02 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
FUEL KG (LB)
KW HR (HP HR)
BSHC G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSCO G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSC02 G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSNOX G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSFC KG/KW HR (LB/HP HR)
TOTAL TEST RESULTS 1 BAGS
TOTAL KW HR (HP HR)
BSHC G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSCO G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSC02 G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSNOX G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
41.00 ( 54.98)
.21 ( .15)
.54 ( .40)
666. ( 497.)
13.68 ( 10.20)
ENGINE EMISSION RESULTS
2100 RPM
TEST 2100 RUN1
DATE 12/19/83
TIME
DYNO NO. 5
PROJECT NO. 05-7338-003
DIESEL EM-528-F
BAG CART NO. 1
RELATIVE HUMIDITY
ABSOLUTE HUMIDITY
, ENGINE-65. PCT , CVS-22. PCT
9.0 GM/KG( 63.2 GRAINS/LB) NOX HUMIDITY C.F. 1.0000
1
500.0
**«*» (40440.)
20.0/ 2/ 20.
8.0/ 2/ 8.
19.4/13/ 18.
.5/13/ 0.
73.7/ 3/ 1.34
2.7/ 3/ .04
85.8/ 3/ 257.
.5/ 3/ 2.
9.97
13.
17.
1.30
256.1
8.45
22.22
27314.4
560.81
8.600 ( 18.96)
41.00 ( 54.98)
.21 ( .15)
.54 ( .40)
666.23 ( 496.81)
13.68 ( 10.20)
.210 ( .345)
PARTICULATE RESULTS, TOTAL FOR 1 BAGS
90MM PARTICULATE RATES
GRAMS/TEST
G/KWHR(G/HPHR)
G/KG FUEL (G/LB FUEL)
FILTER EFF.
7.32
.18 ( .13)
.85 ( .39)
94.8
BSFC KG/KW HR (LB/HP HR) .210 ( .345)
-------
APPENDIX B
PARTICULATE TRAP BYPASS SYSTEM
-------
NC Time
Delay
Relay
NO
Temp.
Switch
Syracuse
THRO 3320
115V AC
NO
Pressure
Switch
+12v.
NO
NC
ASCO
SA10A/
TB10A32
Sigma
76R4-
12DC-SCO
+12v.
Normally Open
Normally Closed
K - Type K Thermocouple
NC
Pneumatic
Solenoid
NO
Temp.
Switch
Thermo Electron 55-1110-401
si
Jp7e
Pneumatic
Actuated
Bypass
Valve
Corning
Par£icul&te
Traps
K
Thermo Electron
55-1110-401
Pressure
to Bypass \_ASCO 8344A70 12DC
Valve
Fabricated
en
03
ca
Exhaust
Schematic of particulate trap bypass system
B-2
-------
APPENDIX C
EXHAUST PARTICULATE TRAP RESULTS
C-2 through C-19 Computer Printouts of Hot-Start Transient
Tests
C-20 through C-26 Computer Printouts of Cold-Start Transient
Tests
-------
ENGINE NO.
ENGINE MODEL
ENGINE 0.0 L(
CVS NO. 10
83 CUMMINS NTC-400
0. CID)
TABLE ENGINE EMISSION RESULTS
H-TRANS.
TEST NO.BLWOH RUN3
DATE 6/ 7/84
TIME
DYNO NO. 5
PROJECT NO. 03-7338-003
DIESEL EM-597-F
BAG CART NO. 1
BAROMETER 736.60 MM HG(29.00 IN HG)
DRY BULB TEMP. 25.6 DEG C(78.0 DEG F)
BAG RESULTS
BAG NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
TIME SECONDS
TOTAL FLOW STD. CU. METRES(SCF)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY
ABSOLUTE HUMIDITY
, ENGINE-44. PCT , CVS-59. PCT
9.3 GM/KG( 65.1 GRAINS/LB) NOX HUMIDITY C.F. 1.0000
HC SAMPLE
HC BCKGRD
CO SAMPLE
CO BCKGRD
C02 SAMPLE
CO2 BCKGRD
NOX SAMPLE
NOX BCKGRD
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PCT
METER/RANGE/PCT
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
O DILUTION FACTOR
M HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
C02 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
FUEL KG (LB)
KW HR (HP HR)
BSHC G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSCO G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSC02 G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSNOX G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSFC KG/KW HR (LB/HP HR)
TOTAL TEST RESULTS 4 BAGS
TOTAL KW HR (HP HR)
BSHC G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSCO G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSCO2 G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSNOX G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
17.82 ( 23.90)
.72 (
5.63 (
776. (
7.85 (
.54)
4.20)
579.)
5.86)
1
NYNF
296.1
264.5 ( 9344.)
27
9
56
88
11
85
1
.9/22/
.9/ 2/
.2/13/
.7/13/
.0/12/
.6/12/
.9/ I/
.11 \/
33.61
18.
51.
.35
25.1
2.79
15.86
1708.4
12.68
.547
1.79
1.56
8.86
954.59
7.09
.306
28.
10.
54.
1.
.39
.04
26.
0.
( 1.21)
( 2.40)
( 1.16)
( 6.61)
( 711.84)
( 5.28)
( .503)
PARTI CULATE
2
LANF
300.0
269.7 ( 9525.)
30.0/22/
10. O/ 2/
51.2/12/
.1/12/
69.9/11/
7.0/11/
46. 2/ 2/
.3/ 2/
21.70
21.
105.
.57
45.9
3.19
33.09
2792.8
23.69
.897
3.21
.99
10.32
870.97
7.39
.280
RESULTS,
30.
10.
109.
0.
.60
.04
46.
0.
( 1.98)
( 4.30)
( .74)
( 7.70)
( 649.48)
( 5.51)
( .460)
TOTAL FOR
3
LAF
305.1
274.3 ( 9690.)
2S.5/22/
8.7/ 2/
53.6/12/ 1
.3/12/
84. 6/ 3/ 1
3. I/ 3/
57. I/ 3/ 1
.I/ 3/
8.49
18.
109.
1.52
171.0
2.82
34.75
7654.0
89.76
2.425
10.97
.26
3.17
697.77
8.18
.221
4 BAGS
25.
9.
15.
1.
.57
.05
71.
0.
( 5.35)
( 14.71)
( .19)
( 2.36)
( 520.33)
( 6.10)
( .363)
90MM PART ICUL ATE RATES GRAMS/TEST
G/KWHR
(G/HPHR)
G/KG FUEL (G/LB
FILTER
EFF.
FU€L)
4
NYNF
297.9
267.8 ( 9458.)
34.5/22/
8.5/ 2/
57.5/13/
.1/13/
86.2/12/
11.7/12/
92. 0/ I/
1.2/ I/
34.45
26.
53.
.34
27.0
4.06
16.63
1675.5
13.84
.539
1.86
2.18
8.96
902.38
7.45
.290
13.17
.74 ( .
2.99 ( 1.
98.0
35.
9.
55.
0.
.38
.04
27.
0.
( 1
( 2
( 1
( 6
( 672
( 5
I •
55)
36)
.19)
.49)
.63)
.68)
.90)
.56)
477)
BSFC KG/KW HR (LB/HP HR) .247 ( .407)
-------
TABLE
ENGINE EMISSION RESULTS
H-TRANS.
ENGINE NO.
ENGINE MODEL
ENGINE 0.0 L(
CVS NO. 10
83 CUMMINS NTC-400
0. CID)
BAROMETER 736.35 MM HG(28.99 IN HG)
DRY BULB TEMP. 26.1 DEG C(79.0 DEG F)
BAG RESULTS
BAG NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
TIME SECONDS
TOTAL FLOW STD. CIJ. METRES(SCF)
HC
HC
CO
CO
SAMPLE
BCKGRD
SAMPLE
BCKGRD
C02 SAMPLE
CO2 BCKGRD
NOX SAMPLE
NOX BCKGRD
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PCT
METER/RANGE/PCT
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
O DILUTION FACTOR
J, HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
C02 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
FUEL KG (LB)
KW HR (HP HR)
BSHC G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSCO G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSC02 G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSNOX G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSFC KG/KW HR (LB/HP HR)
TOTAL TEST RESULTS 4 BAGS
TOTAL KW HR (HP HR)
BSHC G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSCO G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSC02 G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSNOX G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
18.16 ( 24.35)
.68 ( .50)
5.57 ( 4.15)
777. ( 579.)
8.10 ( 6.04)
PROJECT NO. 03-7338-003
TEST NO.BLWOH
DATE 6/ 7/84
TIME
DYNO NO. 5
RUN4
DIESEL EM-597-F
BAG CART NO. 1
RELATIVE HUMIDITY , ENGINE-46. PCT , CVS-59. PCT
ABSOLUTE HUMIDITY 10.1 GM/KG( 70.4 GRAINS/LB) NOX HUMIDITY C.F. 1.0000
1
NYNF
296.1
266.9 ( 9426.)
27.6/22/
8.2/ 2/
58.4/13/
1.2/13/
88.8/12/
12.0/12/
91. 5/ I/
.5/ I/
33.19
20.
53.
.36
27.1
3.02
16.56
1740.0
13.82
.558
1.83
1.65
9.07
952.39
7.57
.305
28.
8.
56.
1.
.40
.04
27.
0.
( 1
( 2
( 1
( 6
( 710
( 5
(
.23)
.45)
.23)
.76)
.20)
.64)
502)
2
LANF
300.0
270.6 ( 9557.)
2S.9/22/ 29.
10.O/ 2/ 10.
50.9/12/ 108.
.4/12/ 1.
70.5/1 I/ .61
7.2/11/ .04
48.2/ 2/ 48.
.3/ 2/ 0.
3
LAF
305.1
275.1 ( 9718.)
2S.2/22/ 25.
10.O/ 2/ 10.
53.0/12/ 113.
.5/12/ 1.
85.3/ 3/ 1.58
3.1/ 3/ .05
59.2/ 3/ 178.
.I/ 3/ 0.
4
NYNF
298.0
268.8 ( 9493.)
33.S/22/
10.3/ 2/
59.8/13/
.1/13/
89.8/12/
12.1/12/
29.8/ 2/
,4/ 2/
33.
10.
57.
0.
.40
.04
30.
0.
21.45
19.
104.
.57
47.9
3.03
32.81
2833.6
24.80
.909 (
3.29 (
.92 (
9.98 (
861.66 (
7.54 (
.277 (
2.00)
4.41)
.69)
7.44)
642.54)
5.62)
.455)
8.41
16.
107.
1.54
177.3
2.59
34.28
7749.9
93.33
2.454 (
11.14 (
.23 (
3.08 (
695.63 (
8.38 (
.220 (
5.41)
14.94)
.17)
2.29)
518.73)
6.25)
.362)
32.65
24.
56.
.36
29.4
3.64
17.42
1780.5
15.12
.572 (
1.90 (
1.92 (
9.16 (
936.33 (
7.95 (
.301 (
1 .26)
2.55)
1.43)
6.83)
698.22)
5.93)
.494)
PARTICULATE RESULTS, TOTAL FOR 4 BAGS
90MM PARTICULATE RATES
GRAMS/TEST
G/KWHR(G/HPHR)
G/KG FUEL (G/LB FUEL)
FILTER EFF.
12.60
.69 ( .52)
2.80 ( 1.27)
97.7
BSFC KG/KW HR (LB/HP HR) .247 ( .407)
-------
TABLE
ENGINE NO.
ENGINE MODEL
ENGINE 0.0 L(
CVS NO. 10
83 CUMMINS NTC-400
0. CID)
BAROMETER 743.46 MM HG(29.27 IN HG)
DRY BULB TEMP. 25.0 DEG C(77.0 DEC F)
BAG RESULTS
BAG NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
TIME SECONDS
TOTAL FLOW STD. CU. METRES(SCF)
HC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
HC BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
C02 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
C02 BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
C02 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
FUEL KG (LB)
KW HR (HP HR)
BSHC G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSCO G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSC02 G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSNOX G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSFC KG/KW HR (LB/HP HR)
O
I
TOTAL TEST RESULTS 4 BAGS
TOTAL KW HR (HP HR)
BSHC G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSCO G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSC02 G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSNOX G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
18.78 ( 25.18)
.72 ( .54)
5.94 ( 4.43)
764. ( 569.)
7.43 ( 5.54)
ENGINE EMISSION RESULTS
H-TRANS.
TEST NO.BLWOH RUNS
DATE 6/11/84
TIME
DYNO NO. 5
PROJECT NO. 03-7338-003
DIESEL EM-597
BAG CART NO. 1
RELATIVE HUMIDITY , ENGINE-52. PCT , CVS-63. PCT
ABSOLUTE HUMIDITY 10.4 GM/KG( 73.1 GRAINS/LB) NOX HUMIDITY C.F. 1.0000
1
NYNF
297.0
269.5 ( 9517.)
32
12
65
1
91
12
90
1
.0/22/
.O/ 2/
.0/13/
.3/13/
.6/12/
.8/12/
.2/ I/
,3/ I/
31.77
20.
60.
.37
26.5
3.17
18.79
1827.3
13.64
.586
1.91
1.66
9.84
957.19
7.14
.307
32.
12.
63.
1.
.41
.04
27.
0.
( 1.29)
( 2.56)
( 1.24)
( 7.34)
( 713.77)
( 5.33)
( .505)
PARTICULATE
2
LANF
299.9
273.1 ( 9647.) 277
33.6/22/
12. O/ 2/
55.9/12/
.1/12/
71. 5/1 I/
7.4/11/
47. 5/ 2/
.3/ 2/
20.97
22.
117.
.58
47.2
3.49
37.13
2917.3
24.67
.938
3.43
1.02
10.83
850.46
7.19
.274
RESULTS,
34. 27.
12. 11.
121. 55.
0.
.62 85.
.04 3.
48. 54.
0.
( 2.07)
( 4.60)
( .76)
( 8.07)
( 634.19)
( 5.36)
( .450)
3
LAF
305.0
.8 ( 9814.)
1/22/
8/ 21
8/12/
3/12/
21 3/
I/ 3/
5/ 3/
I/ 3/
8.42
17.
114.
1.54
163.2
2.68
36.88
7815.8
86.76
2.476
1 1.42
.23
3.23
684.15
7.59
.217
27.
12.
121.
1.
1.58
.05
164.
0.
( 5.46)
( 15.32)
( .17)
( 2.41)
( 510.17)
( 5.66)
( .356)
4
NYNF
297.9
271.2 ( 9580.)
37.S/22/
11. 2/ 2/
63.4/13/
.1/13/
89.4/12/
12.4/12/
94. 7/ I/
.6/ I/
32.78
27.
59.
.36
28.0
4.22
18.72
1779.7
14.53
.573
2.01
2.09
9.30
883.91
7.22
.284
38.
11.
61.
0.
.40
.04
28.
0.
( 1
( 2
( 1
( 6
( 659
( 5
* *
.26)
.70)
.56)
.93)
.13)
.38)
467)
TOTAL FOR 4 BAGS
90MM PARTICULATE RATES GRAMS/TEST
G/KWHR(G/HPHR)
G/KG FUEL
(G/LB
FUEL)
FILTER EFF.
14.33
.76 ( .
3.13 ( 1.
97.2
57)
42)
BSFC KG/KW HR (LB/HP HR) .244 ( .400)
-------
TABLE
ENGINE NO.
ENGINE MODEL
ENGINE 0.0 L(
CVS NO. 10
83 CUMMINS NTC-400
0. CID)
BAROMETER 743.46 MM HG(29.27 IN HG)
DRY BULB TEMP. 24.4 DEG C(76.0 DEG F)
BAG RESULTS
BAG NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
TIME SECONDS
TOTAL FLOW STD. CU. METRES(SCF)
HC SAMPLE
HC BCKGRD
CO SAMPLE
CO BCKGRD
C02 SAMPLE
C02 BCKGRD
NOX SAMPLE
NOX BCKGRD
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PCT
METER/RANGE/PCT
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
O DlLUTION FACTOR
^ HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
C02 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
FUEL KG (LB)
KW HR (HP HR)
BSHC G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSCO G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSC02 G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSNOX G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSFC KG/KW HR (LB/HP HR)
TOTAL TEST RESULTS 4 BAGS
TOTAL KW HR (HP HR)
BSHC G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSCO G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSC02 G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSNOX G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSFC KG/KW HR (LB/HP HR)
17.93 ( 24.05)
.68 (
5.29 (
766. (
7.37 (
.244 (
.51)
3.95)
571.)
5.49)
.401)
ENGINE EMISSION RESULTS
H-TRANS.
PROJECT NO. 03-7338-003
TEST NO.BLWOH
DATE 6/16/84
TIME
DYNO NO. 5
RUN6
DIESEL EM-597-F
BAG CART NO. 1
RELATIVE HUMIDITY , ENGINE-57. PCT , CVS-59. PCT
ABSOLUTE HUMIDITY 11.2 GM/KG( 78.4 GRAINS/LB) NOX HUMIDITY C.F. 1.0000
268
28.
10.
52.
•
89.
12.
86.
1.
1
NYNF
296.2
.8 ( 9493.)
3/22/
O/ 2/
7/13/
9/13/
4/12/
5/12/
5/ I/
O/ I/
32.94
19.
48.
.36
25.4
2.89
14.96
1761.6
13.08
.564
1 .84
1.57
8.12
956.44
7.10
.306
28.
10.
50.
1.
.40
.04
26.
0.
( 1.24)
( 2.47)
( 1.17)
( 6.06)
( 713.21)
( 5.30)
( .503)
2
LANF
300.1
272.3 ( 9617.)
29.2/22/
10. 5/ 2/
48.2/12/
.6/12/
69.2/11/
7.4/11/
44. 6/ 2/
.3/ 2/
22.04
19.
97.
.55
44.3
3.02
30.87
2765.0
23.08
.887
3.29
.92
9.39
840.80
7.02
.270
29.
11.
101.
1.
.60
.04
45.
0.
( 1.96)
( 4.41)
( .68)
( 7.00)
( 626.98)
( 5.23)
( .443)
3
LAP
305.1
276.9 ( 9780.)
24.7/22/
10. O/ 2/
53.1/12/
.6/12/
82. 3/ 3/
2.7/ 3/
51. 8/ 3/
.I/ 3/
8.75
16.
107.
1.48
155.1
2.53
34.57
7509.6
82.17
2.379
10.85
.23
3.19
692.13
7.57
.219
25.
10.
114.
1.
1.52
.04
155.
0.
( 5.24)
( 14.55)
( .17)
( 2.38)
( 516.12)
( 5.65)
( .360)
4
NYNF
298.0
270.4 ( 9551.)
33.0/22/
9.4/ 2/
51.2/13/
1.3/13/
86.4/12/
12.0/12/
90. I/ I/
,7/ I/
34.42
24.
46.
.34
26.6
3.72
14.49
1692.7
13.76
.543
1.95
1.90
7.41
866.38
7.04
.278
33.
9.
48.
1.
.38
.04
27.
0.
( 1
( 2
( 1
( 5
( 646
( 5
(
.20)
.62)
.42)
.53)
.06)
.25)
457)
PARTICULATE RESULTS, TOTAL FOR 4 BAGS
90MM PART ICULATE RATES
GRAMS/TEST
G/KWHR(G/HPHR)
G/KG FUEL (G/LB FUEL)
FILTER EFF.
12.98
.72 ( .54)
2.97 ( 1.35)
98.0
-------
TABLE
ENGINE NO.
ENGINE MODEL
ENGINE 0.0 L(
CVS NO. 10
83 CUMMINS NTC-400
0. CID)
BAROMETER 738.63 MM HG(29.08 IN HG)
DRY BULB TEMP. 25.0 DEG C(77.0 DEG F)
BAG RESULTS
BAG NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
TIME SECONDS
TOTAL FLOW STD. CU. METRES(SCF)
HC
HC
CO
CO
SAMPLE
BCKGRD
SAMPLE
BCKGRD
C02 SAMPLE
CO2 BCKGRD
NOX SAMPLE
NOX BCKGRD
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PCT
METER/RANGE/PCT
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
n
cn
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
C02 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
FUEL KG (LB)
KW HR (HP HR)
BSHC G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSCO G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSC02 G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSNOX G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSFC KG/KW HR (LB/HP HR)
TOTAL TEST RESULTS 4 BAGS
TOTAL KW HR (HP HR)
BSHC G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSCO G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSC02 G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSNOX G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
14.79 ( 19.84)
.62 ( .46)
7.35 ( 5.48)
858. ( 640.)
6.76 ( 5.04)
ENGINE EMISSION RESULTS
H-TRANS.
TEST NO.BLWTH RUN1
DATE 6/ 7/84
TIME
DYNO NO. 5
PROJECT NO. 03-7338-003
DIESEL EM-597-F
BAG CART NO. 1
RELATIVE HUMIDITY
ABSOLUTE HUMIDITY
1
NYNF
295.9
267.9 ( 9464.)
, ENGINE-47. PCT , CVS-65. PCT
9.6 GM/KG( 67.1 GRAINS/LB) NOX HUMIDITY C.F. 1.0000
2
LANF
300.0
271.7 ( 9595.)
3
LAF
305.1
276.2 ( 9756.)
4
NYNF
297.9
269.7 ( 9525.)
27
9
39
84
11
73
.3/22/
.4/ 2/
.7/13/
.1/13/
.1/12/
.9/12/
.8/ I/
.8/ I/
35.80
18.
36.
.33
21.7
2.81
11.17
1613.2
11.13
.515
1.54
1.83
7.27
1050.19
7.25
.335
27.
9.
37.
0.
.37
.04
22.
0.
( 1.14)
( 2.06)
( 1.36)
( 5.42)
( 783.13)
( 5.40)
( .551)
PART ICUL ATE
32.S/22/
13. 4/ 2/
69.5/13/
.4/13/
63.0/11/
7.1/11/
32. 4/ 2/
.I/ 2/
25.21
20.
65.
.48
32.3
3.08
20.62
2400.4
16.79
.767
2.46
1.25
8.38
975.44
6.82
.312
RESULTS,
90MM PART ICUL ATE RATES
32.
13.
68.
0.
.52
.04
32.
0.
( 1
( 3
(
( 6
( 727
( 5
\ •
TOTAL
.69)
.30)
.93)
.25)
.38)
.09)
513)
FOR
18.
13.
88.
9
79.
3.
38.
•
9/22/
2/ 2/
4/12/ 2
1/12/
5/ 3/ 1
4/ 3/
2/ 3/ 1
I/ 3/
9.04
7.
205.
1.41
114.3
1.14
66.00
7147.8
60.41
2.279
9.25
.12
7.13
772.39
6.53
.246
19.
13.
16.
0.
.46
.05
15.
0.
( 5.02)
( 12.41)
( .09)
( 5.32)
( 575.97)
( 4.87)
( .405)
27.0/22/
13.5/ 2/
39.1/13/
.8/13/
81.4/12/
12.9/12/
76. 6/ I/
.9/ I/
37.33
14.
35.
.31
22.5
2.16
10.88
1530.6
11.62
.488
1.54
1.40
7.05
991.59
7.53
.316
27.
14.
36.
1.
.35
.04
23.
0.
( 1
( 2
( 1
( 5
( 739
( 5
' •
.08)
.07)
.04)
.26)
.43)
.61)
520)
4 BAGS
GRAMS/TEST
G/KWHR
(G/HPHR)
G/KG FUEL
F
ILTER
(G/LB
FUEL)
EFF.
1.45
.10 ( .
.36 ( .
84.0
07)
16)
BSFC KG/KW HR (LB/HP HR) .274 ( .450)
-------
TABLE
ENGINE EMISSION RESULTS
H-TRANS.
PROJECT NO. 03-7338-003
ENGINE NO.
ENGINE MODEL
ENGINE 0.0 L(
CVS NO. 10
83 CUMMINS NTC-400
0. CID)
BAROMETER 737.87 MM HG(29.05 IN HG)
DRY BULB TEMP. 25.6 DEG C(78.0 DEG F)
BAG RESULTS
BAG NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
TIME SECONDS
TOTAL FLOW STD. CU. METRES(SCF)
HC
HC
CO
CO
SAMPLE
BCKGRD
SAMPLE
BCKGRD
C02 SAMPLE
CO2 BCKGRD
NOX SAMPLE
NOX BCKGRD
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PCT
METER/RANGE/PCT
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
O
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
C02 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
FUEL KG (LB)
KW HR (HP HR)
BSHC G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSCO G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSC02 G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSNOX G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSFC KG/KW HR (LB/HP HR)
TOTAL TEST RESULTS 4 BARS
TOTAL KW HR (HP HR)
BSHC G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSCO G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSC02 G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSNOX G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSFC KG/KW HR (LB/HP HR)
14.94 ( 20.04)
.55 (
7.36 (
836. (
6.98 (
.267 (
.41)
5.49)
624.)
5.20)
.439)
TEST NO.BLWTH RUN2
DATE 6/ 7/84
TIME DIESEL EM-597-F
DYNO NOv 5 BAG CART NO. 1
RELATIVE HUMIDITY , ENGINE-46. PCT , CVS-60. PCT
ABSOLUTE HUMIDITY 9.7 GM/KG( 67.9 GRAINS/LB) NOX HUMIDITY C.F.
1234
NYNF LANF LAP NYNF
295.9 300.0 305.0 297.9
267.4 ( 9443.)
24
1 1
45
1
82
12
77
.4/22/
.5/ 21
.0/13/
.3/13/
.5/12/
.8/12/
.O/ I/
.7/ I/
36.67
13.
40.
.32
22.7
2.03
12.43
1549.7
11.61
.495
1.54
1.32
8.09
1008.84
7.56
.322
24.
12.
42.
1.
.36
.04
23.
0.
( 1.09)
( 2.06)
( .99)
( 6.03)
( 752.29)
( 5.64)
( .530)
271.1 ( 9577.)
28.1/22/
11.5/ 2/
76.6/13/
1.1/13/
63.5/11/
7.3/11/
34. 9/ 2/
.3/ 2/
24.93
17.
72.
.49
34.6
2.67
22.80
2418.5
17.95
.774
2.56
1.04
8.92
945.55
7.02
.302
28.
12.
75.
1.
.53
.04
35.
0.
( 1.71)
( 3.43)
( .78)
( 6.65)
( 705.10)
( 5.23)
( .497)
275.6 ( 9736.)
16.1/22/
9.5/ 2/
16.
10.
87.0/12/ 211.
.2/12/
78. 4/ 3/
3.2/ 3/
39. 9/ 3/
.I/ 3/
9.19
8.
201.
1.39
119.4
1.21
64.55
7031.4
62.98
2.242
9.30
.13
6.94
756.15
6.77
.241
0.
1.44
.05
120.
0.
( 4.94)
( 12.47)
( .10)
( 5.18)
( 563.86)
( 5.05)
( .396)
1.0000
269.2 ( 9508.)
24.2/22/
9. I/ 2/
37.0/13/
1.1/13/
80.0/12/
12.4/12/
77. 3/ I/
.9/ I/
38.22
15.
32.
.30
22.7
2.38
10.17
1497.8
It. 71
.478
1.55
1.53
6.56
965.68
7.55
.308
24.
9.
34.
1.
.34
.04
23.
0.
( 1
( 2
( 1
( 4
( 720
( 5
(
.05)
.08)
.14)
.89)
.11)
.63)
507)
PARTICULATE RESULTS, TOTAL FOR 4 BAGS
90MM PARTICULATE RATES
GRAMS/TEST
G/KWHR(G/HPHR)
G/KG FUEL (G/LB FUEL)
FILTER EFF.
1.13
.08 ( .06)
.28 ( .13)
79.2
-------
TABLE
ENGINE EMISSION RESULTS
H-TRANS.
PROJECT NO. 03-7338-003
ENGINE NO.
ENGINE MODEL
ENGINE 0.0 L(
CVS NO. 10
83 CUMMINS NTC-400
0. CID)
BAROMETER 739.90 MM HG(29.13 IN HG)
DRY BULB TEMP. 24.4 DEC C(76.0 DEC F)
BAG RESULTS
BAG NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
TIME SECONDS
TOTAL FLOW STD. CU. METRES(SCF)
HC
HC
CO
CO
SAMPLE
BCKGRD
SAMPLE
BCKGRD
C02 SAMPLE
C02 BCKGRD
NOX SAMPLE
NOX BCKGRD
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PCT
METER/RANGE/PCT
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
O
I
00
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
C02 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
FUEL KG (LB)
KW HR (HP HR)
BSHC G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSCO G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSC02 G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSNOX G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSFC KG/KW HR (LB/HP HR)
TOTAL TEST RESULTS 4 BAGS
TOTAL KW HR (HP HR)
BSHC G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSCO G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSC02 G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSNOX G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
14.88 (
.66 (
7.43 (
860. (
6.98 (
19.95)
.49)
5.54)
641.)
5.21)
TEST NO.BLWTH
DATE 6/ 8/84
TIME
DYNO NO. 5
RUN3
DIESEL EM-597-F
BAG CART NO. 1
RELATIVE HUMIDITY , ENGINE-58. PCT , CVS-59. PCT
ABSOLUTE HUMIDITY 11.5 GM/KG( 80.2 GRAINS/LB) NOX HUMIDITY C.F. 1.0000
1
NYNF
296.0
268.7 ( 9491.)
28
8
44
1
84
11
74
.4/22/
.8/ 2/
.1/13/
.3/13/
.3/12/
.7/12/
.6/ I/
.9/ I/
35.64
20.
39.
.33
21.9
3.07
12.22
1627.0
11.27
.520
1.53
2.01
8.00
1064.30
7.37
.340
28.
9.
41.
1.
.37
.04
22.
0.
2
LANF
300.0
272.3 ( 96
30.9/22/
11. 5/
2/
72.0/13/
1.9/1
62.7/1
6.9/1
33. 6/
.21
25
3/
I/
I/
2/
21
.37
18.)
31.
12.
70.
2.
.52
.04
34.
0.
276
17.
11.
89.
.
79.
3.
40.
20.
67.
•
33
3
21
48
.4
.11
.14
2394.7
( 1.15)
( 2.05)
( 1.50)
( 5.96)
( 793.65)
( 5.50)
( .559)
PARTI CULATE
17
•
2
1
8
964
7
•
.40
766
.48
.25
.51
.38
.01
308
RESULTS,
90MM P ARTICULATE RATES
( 1
( 3
(
( 6
( 719
( 5
(
TOTAL
.69)
.33)
.93)
.35)
.14)
.23)
507)
3
LAF
305.0
.8 ( 9776.)
5/22/
2/ 2/
4/12/
8/12/
9/ 3/
I/ 3/
O/ 3/
I/ 3/
8.99
8.
208.
1.43
119.7
1.21
66.92
7225.7
63.40
2.304
9.31
.13
7.18
775.81
6.81
.247
18.
11.
219.
1.
1.47
.05
120.
0.
4
NYNF
297.9
270.4 ( 9549.)
25.S/22/ 26.
10. 9/
36.7/1
2/ 1 1.
3/ 34.
.9/13/ 1.
81.1/12/ .35
12.0/12/ .04
77. 2/
.5/
37
I/ 23.
I/ 0.
.55
15.
32.
( 5.08)
( 12.49)
( .10)
( 5.36)
( 578.52)
( 5.08)
( .407)
•
22
2
10
154
11
•
1
1
6
993
7
•
31
.8
.37
.19
1.7
.80
492 (
.55 (
.53 (
.57 (
.95 ( 74
.61 (
317 (
1.08)
2.08)
1.14)
4.90)
1.19)
5.67)
.521)
FOR 4 BAGS
GRAMS/TEST
G/KWHR(G/HPHR)
G/KG FUEL
(G/LB
FUEL)
FILTER EFF.
1.64
.11 (
.40 (
81.
.08)
.18)
3
BSFC KG/KW HR (LB/HP HR) .274 ( .451)
-------
TABLE
ENGINE EMISSION RESULTS
H-TRANS.
PROJECT NO. 03-7338-003
ENGINE NO.
ENGINE MODEL
ENGINE 0.0 L(
CVS NO. 10
83 CUMMINS NTC-400
0. CID)
BAROMETER 742.19 MM HG(29.22 IN HG)
DRY BULB TEMP. 24.4 DEG C(76.0 DEG F)
BAG RESULTS
BAG NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
TIME SECONDS
TOTAL FLOW STD. CU. METRES(SCF)
HC
HC
CO
CO
SAMPLE
BCKGRD
SAMPLE
BCKGRD
C02 SAMPLE
C02 BCKGRD
NOX SAMPLE
NOX BCKGRD
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PCT
METER/RANGE/PCT
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
9 HC CONCENTRATION PPM
tf> CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
C02 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
FUEL KG (LB)
KW HR (HP HR)
BSHC G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSCO G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSC02 G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSNOX G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSFC KG/KW HR (LB/HP HR)
TOTAL TEST RESULTS 4 BAGS
TOTAL KW HR (HP HR)
BSHC G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSCO G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSC02 G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSNOX G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSFC KG/KW HR (LB/HP HR)
15.20 ( 20.38)
.70 (
7.19 (
831. (
6.90 (
.265 (
.52)
5.36)
620.)
5.15)
.436)
TEST NO.BLWTH
DATE 6/18/84
TIME
DYNO NO. 5
RUN4
DIESEL EM-597-F
BAG CART NO. 1
RELATIVE HUMIDITY , ENGINE-59. PCT , CVS-59. PCT
ABSOLUTE HUMIDITY 11.6 GM/KG( 81.3 GRAINS/LB) NOX HUMIDITY C.F. 1.0000
1
NYNF
296.0
268.9 ( 9498.)
28
10
42
1
83
12
76
.8/22/
.5/ 2/
.8/13/
.6/13/
.0/12/
.3/12/
.6/ I/
.3/ I/
36.36
19.
38.
.32
22.7
2.89
1 1.76
1581.3
11.68
.505
1.59
1.82
7.40
995.59
7.35
.318
29.
11.
40.
1.
.36
.04
23.
0.
( 1.11)
( 2.13)
( 1.36)
( 5.52)
( 742.41)
( 5.48)
( .523)
PARTICULATE
2
LANF
300.0
272.5 ( 9626.
32.8/22/
10. 4/ 2/
67.8/13/
1.2/13/
62.7/11/
7.1/11/
33. 9/ 2/
.I/ 2/
25.38
23.
63.
.48
33.8
3.59
19.94
2390.8
17.62
.765
2.54
1.42
7.87
942.99
6.95
.302
RESULTS,
33.
10.
66.
1.
.52
.04
34.
0.
(
(
(
(
) 277
17.
9.
89.
•
79.
3.
40.
•
1.69)
3.40)
1.06)
5.87)
( 703.19)
(
(
5.18)
.496)
3
LAF
305.0
.1 ( 9788.)
7/22/
2/ 2/
0/12/
6/12/
O/ 3/
I/ 3/
2/ 3/
I/ 3/
9.11
9.
207.
1.41
120.3
1.51
66.72
7139.1
63.79
2.277
9.48
.16
7.04
753.24
6.73
.240
18.
9.
218.
1.
1.45
.05
121.
0.
( 5.02)
( 12.71)
( .12)
( 5.25)
( 561.69)
( 5.02)
( .395)
4
NYNF
297.7
270.5 ( 9556.)
26.0/22/ 26.
9.2/ 2/ 9.
39.4/13/ 37.
1.4/13/ 1.
80.6/12/ .35
12.3/12/ .04
77. I/ I/ 23.
.5/ I/ 0.
37.81
17.
34.
.31
22.8
2.66
10.86
1523.7
11.80
.487 (
1.60 (
1.66 (
6.81 (
954.81 ( 71
7.39 (
.305 (
1.07)
2.14)
1.24)
5.08)
2.00)
5.51)
.501)
TOTAL FOR 4 BAGS
90MM PARTICULATE RATES
GRAMS/TEST
G/KWHR(G/HPHR)
G/KG FUEL
(G/LB
FUEL)
FILTER EFF.
1.65
.11 ( .08)
.41 ( .19)
79.0
-------
TABLE
ENGINE EMISSION RESULTS
H-TRANS.
PROJECT NO. 03-7338-003
ENGINE NO.
ENGINE MODEL
ENGINE 0.0 L(
CVS NO. 10
83 CUMMINS NTC-40
0. CID)
BAROMETER 743.46 MM HG(29.27 IN HG)
DRY BULB TEMP. 23.3 DEC C(74.0 DEC F)
BAG RESULTS
RAG NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
TIME SECONDS
TOTAL FLOW STD. CU. METRES(SCF)
HC SAMPLE
HC BCKGRD
CO SAMPLE
CO BCKGRD
C02 SAMPLE
C02 BCKGRD
NOX SAMPLE
NOX BCKGRD
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PCT
METER/RANGE/PCT
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
O
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
C02 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
FUEL KG (LB)
KW HR (HP HR)
BSHC G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSCO G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSC02 G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSNOX G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSFC KG/KW HR (LB/HP HR)
TOTAL TEST RESULTS 4 BAGS
TOTAL KW HR (HP HR)
BSHC G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSCO G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSC02 G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSNOX G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
17.80 ( 23.87)
.69 ( .51)
6.06 ( 4.52)
756. ( 564.)
7.00 ( 5.22)
TEST NO.BLDT
DATE 6/20/84
TIME
DYNO NO. 5
RUN2
DIESEL EM-597-F
BAG CART NO. 1
RELATIVE HUMIDITY , ENGINE-58. PCT , CVS-62. PCT
ABSOLUTE HUMIDITY 10.6 GM/KG( 73.9 GRAINS/LB) NOX HUMIDITY C.F. 1.0000
1
NYNF
296.1
270.0 ( 9537.)
28
10
47
87
12
81
1
.3/22/
.O/ 2/
.8/13/
.3/13/
.0/12/
.9/12/
.5/ I/
.21 I/
34.18
19.
43.
.34
23.9
2.89
13.67
1692.2
12.34
.541
1.85
1.56
7.39
915.05
6.68
.293
28.
10.
45.
0.
.38
.04
24.
0.
( 1.19)
( 2.48)
( 1.16)
( 5.51)
( 682.36)
( 4.98)
( .481)
PARTI CULATE
2
LANF
300.1
273.7 ( 9667.) 278
29.9/22/
10. O/ 2/
49.6/12/
.3/12/
67.9/1 I/
7.4/1 I/
40. 3/ 2/
.4/ 21
22.61
20.
101.
.54
39.9
3.21
32.23
2699.7
20.90
.867
3.15
1.02
10.22
855.87
6.63
.275
RESULTS,
30. 22.
10. 8.
105. 68.
1.
.58 81.
.04 3.
40. 48.
0.
( 1.91)
( 4.23)
( .76)
( 7.62)
( 638.22)
( 4.94)
( . 4 52 )
3
LAF
305.2
.4 ( 9832.)
7/22/
7/ 2/
8/12/
1/12/
O/ 3/
2/ 3/
8/ 3/
I/ 3/
8.89
15.
148.
1.45
146.1
2.41
47.99
7376.7
77.82
2.344
10.85
.22
4.42
679.88
7.17
.216
23.
9.
156.
0.
1.49
.05
146.
0.
( 5.17)
( 14.55)
( .17)
( 3.30)
( 506.99)
( 5.35)
( .355)
4
NYNF
298.1
271.9 ( 9602.)
31.8/22/
8.5/ 21
48.9/13/
.5/13/
86.4/12/
12.6/12/
88. 0/ I/
.9/ I/
34.45
24.
44.
.34
25.9
3.70
14.05
1691.4
13.48
.542
1.95
1.90
7.22
869.03
6.93
.278
32.
9.
46.
0.
.38
.04
26.
0.
( 1
( 2
( 1
( 5
( 648
( 5
* •
.19)
.61)
.42)
.38)
.03)
.16)
458)
TOTAL FOR 4 BAGS
90MM PARTI CULATE RATES GRAMS/TEST
G/KWHR(G/HPHR)
G/KG FUEL
(G/LB
FUEL)
FILTER EFF.
14.16
.80 ( .
3.30 ( 1.
98.4
59)
50)
BSFC KG/KW HR (LB/HP HR) .241 ( .397)
-------
TABLE
ENGINE NO.
ENGINE MODEL
ENGINE 0.0 L(
CVS NO. 10
83 CUMMINS NTC-400
0. CID)
BAROMETER 742.44 MM HG(29.23 IN HG)
DRY BULB TEMP. 23.9 DEC C(75.0 DEG F)
BAG RESULTS
BAG NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
TIME SECONDS
TOTAL FLOW STD. CU. METRES(SCF)
HC
HC
CO
CO
SAMPLE
BCKGRD
SAMPLE
BCKGRD
C02 SAMPLE
C02 BCKGRD
NOX SAMPLE
NOX BCKGRD
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PCT
METER/RANGE/PCT
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
O
I
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
C02 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
FUEL KG (LB)
KW HR (HP HR)
BSHC G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSCO G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSC02 G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSNOX G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSFC KG/KW HR (LB/HP HR)
TOTAL TEST RESULTS 4 BAGS
TOTAL KW HR (HP HR)
BSHC G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSCO G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSC02 G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSNOX G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSFC KG/KW HR (LB/HP HR)
19.20 ( 25.75)
.75 (
4.61 (
751. (
8.07 (
.239 (
.56)
3.44)
560.)
6.02)
.393)
ENGINE EMISSION RESULTS
H-TRANS.
PROJECT NO. 03-7338-003
TEST NO.RBLH
DATE 6/22/84
TIME
DYNO NO. 5
RUN2
DIESEL EM-597-F
BAG CART NO. 1
RELATIVE HUMIDITY , ENGINE-56. PCT , CVS-58. PCT
ABSOLUTE HUMIDITY 10.6 GM/KG( 73.9 GRAINS/LB) NOX HUMIDITY C.F. 1.0000
269
27.
8.
75.
1.
94.
12.
32.
.
1
NYNF
296.0
.1 ( 9506.)
6/22/
O/ 2/
1/13/
3/13/
0/12/
6/12/
3/ 2/
5/ 2/
30.64
20.
71.
.39
31.8
3.08
22.13
1902.2
16.38
.612
2.21
1.39
9.99
858.89
7.40
.276
28.
8.
74.
1.
.43
.04
32.
1.
( 1.35)
( 2.97)
( 1.04)
( 7.45)
( 640.47)
( 5.52)
( .454)
PARTICULATE
2
LANF
300.0
272.8 ( 9634.)
33.2/22/
9.2/ 2/
79.6/13/
1.5/13/
71.2/11/
7.4/11/
54. I/ 2/
.7/ 2/
21.23
24.
75.
.58
53.4
3.85
23.84
2894.4
27.88
.925
3.53
1.09
6.76
820.60
7.90
.262
RESULTS,
90MM PARTI CULATE RATES
33.
9.
79.
1.
.62
.04
54.
1.
( 2.04)
( 4.73)
( .81)
( 5.04)
( 611.92)
( 5.89)
( .431)
TOTAL FOR
3
LAF
305.0
277.3 ( 9796.)
29.4/22/
9.3/ 2/
77.0/13/
1.5/13/
84. 9/ 3/
2.9/ 3/
58. 7/ 3/
.I/ 3/
8.47
21.
71.
1.53
175.8
3.39
22.91
7783.4
93.29
2.460
1 1.23
.30
2.04
693.07
8.31
.219
4 BAGS
29.
9.
76.
1.
1.57
.04
176.
0.
( 5.42)
( 15.06)
( .23)
( 1.52)
( 516.82)
( 6.19)
( .360)
GRAMS/TEST
G/KWHR(G/HPHR)
G/KG
FUEL (G/LB
FUEL)
FILTER EFF.
4
NYNF
298.0
270.9 ( 9568.)
34.S/22/ 34.
9.0/ 2/ 9.
67.8/13/ 66.
1.7/13/ 2.
91.6/12/ .41
12.3/12/ .04
33. 8/ 2/ 34.
,3/ 21 0.
31.73
26.
63.
.37
33.5
4.02
19.73
1845.5
17.36
.594 (
2.23 (
1.80 (
8.85 (
827.70 ( 61
7.79 (
.266 (
10.80
.56 ( .42)
2.35 ( 1.07)
97.0
1.31)
2.99)
1.34)
6.60)
7.22)
5.81)
.438)
-------
TABLE
ENGINE NO.
ENGINE MODEL
ENGINE 0.0 L(
CVS NO. 10
83 CUMMINS NIC-400
0. CIO)
BAROMETER 740.92 MM HG(29.17 IN HG)
DRY BULB TEMP. 25.0 DEC C(77.0 DEG F)
BAG RESULTS
RAG NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
TIME SECONDS
TOTAL FLOW STD. CU. METRES (SCF)
HC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
HC BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
C02 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
C02 BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
C02 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
FUEL KG (LB)
KW HR (HP HR)
BSHC G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSCO G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSC02 G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSNOX G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSFC KG/KW HR (LB/HP HR)
O
TOTAL TEST RESULTS 4 BAGS
TOTAL KW HR (HP HR)
BSHC G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSCO G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSC02 G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSNOX G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
16.66 ( 22.34)
.66 ( .49)
6.99 ( 5.21)
595.)
5.54)
798.
7.43 (
ENGINE EMISSION RESULTS
H-TRANS.
PROJECT NO. 03-7338-003
TEST NO.BLSTH
DATE 7/ 2/84
TIME
DYNO NO. 5
RUN1
DIESEL EM-597-F
BAG CART NO. 1
RELATIVE HUMIDITY , ENGINE-47. PCT , CVS-54. PCT
ABSOLUTE HUMIDITY 9.6 GM/KG( 66.9 GRAINS/LB) NOX HUMIDITY C.F. 1.0000
1
NYNF
296.1
268.9 ( 9498.)
28
9
49
1
84
12
78
.4/22/
.2/ 2/
.8/13/
.1/13/
.7/12/
.2/12/
.O/ I/
.3/ I/
35.37
19.
45.
.33
23.1
3.01
14.05
1631.0
11.89
.522
1.74
1.73
8.05
934.71
6.81
.299
28.
9.
47.
1.
.37
.04
23.
0.
( 1.15)
( 2.34)
( 1.29)
( 6.00)
( 697.01)
( 5.08)
( .492)
PART ICUL ATE
2
LANF
300.1
272.5 ( 9624.) 277
29.4/22/
8.8/ 2/
92.6/13/
.7/13/
65.6/11/
7.2/11/
35. I/ 2/
.I/ 2/
23.76
21.
90.
.51
35.0
3.30
28.65
2555.8
18.24
.820
2.76
1.20
10.38
926.31
6.61
.297
RESULTS,
90MM PART ICUL ATE RATES
29. 16.
9. 7.
94. 82.
1.
.55 82.
.04 3.
35. 50.
0.
( 1.81)
( 3.70)
( .89)
( 7.74)
( 690.75)
( 4.93)
( .489)
3
LAF
305.1
.1 ( 9787.)
8/22/
3/ 2/
7/12/
1/12/
2/ 3/
3/ 3/
8/ 3/
I/ 3/
8.72
10.
188.
1.47
152.1
1.64
60.71
7462.5
80.64
2.376
10.34
.16
5.87
721.51
7.80
.230
17.
7.
198.
0.
1.52
.05
152.
0.
( 5.24)
( 13.87)
( .12)
( 4.38)
( 538.03)
( 5.81)
( .378)
4
NYNF
298.9
270.5 ( 9553.)
26.2/22/
6.9/ 2/
45.9/13/
.6/13/
84.8/12/
12.2/12/
85. O/ I/
.5/ I/
35.37
20.
41.
.33
25.1
3.04
13.06
1643.4
13.01
.526
1.81
1.68
7.21
906.93
7.18
.290
26.
7.
43.
1.
.37
.04
25.
0.
( 1
( 2
( 1
( 5
( 676
( 5
' •
.16)
.43)
.25)
.38)
.30)
.35)
477)
TOTAL FOR 4 BAGS
GRAMS/TEST
G/KWHR(G/HPHR)
G/KG FUEL
(G/LB
FUEL)
FILTER EFF.
1.58
.10 ( .
.37 ( .
74.5
07)
17)
BSFC KG/KW HR (LB/HP HR) .255 ( .419)
-------
TABLE
ENGINE NO.
ENGINE MODEL
ENGINE 0.0 L(
CVS NO. 10
83 CUMMINS NTC-400
0. CID)
BAROMETER 740.41 MM HG(29.15 IN HG)
DRY BULB TEMP. 25.0 DEG C(77.0 DEG F)
BAG RESULTS
PAG NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
TIME SECONDS
TOTAL FLOW STD. CU. METRES(SCF)
HC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
HC BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
C02 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
C02 BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
O
,1 DILUTION FACTOR
w HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
C02 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
FUEL KG (LB)
KW HR (HP HR)
BSHC G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSCO G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSC02 G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSNOX G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSFC KG/KW HR (LB/HP HR)
TOTAL TEST RESULTS 4 BAGS
TOTAL KW HR (HP HR)
BSHC G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSCO G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSC02 G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSNOX G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSFC KG/KW HR (LB/HP HR)
17.43 ( 23.37)
.58
6.72
760.
7.17
.243
.43)
5.01)
567.)
5.34)
.399)
ENGINE EMISSION RESULTS
H-TRANS.
TEST NO.BLSTH RUN2
DATE 7/ 2/84
TIME
DYNO NO. 5
PROJECT NO. 03-7338-003
DIESEL EM-597-F
BAG CART NO. 1
RELATIVE HUMIDITY
ABSOLUTE HUMIDITY
, ENGINE-48. PCT , CVS-54. PCT
9.8 GM/KG( 68.4 GRAINS/LB) NOX HUMIDITY C.F. 1.0000
1
NYNF
296.1
267.9 ( 9462.)
25.6/22/ 26.
6.2/ 2/ 6.
49.4/13/ 47.
.1/13/ 0.
84.9/12/ .37
12.0/12/ .04
80. O/ I/ 24.
.5/ I/ 0.
35.29
20.
45.
.33
23.7
3.03
14.14
1634.0
12.12
.523 ( 1.15)
1.77 ( 2.37)
1.71 ( 1.28)
8.00 ( 5.97)
924.55 ( 689.44)
6.86 ( 5.1 1)
.296 ( .487)
2
LANF
300.1
271.5 ( 9591.)
26.S/22/ 27.
7.5/ 21 8.
91.6/13/ 92.
.8/13/ 1.
65.4/11/ .55
6.9/11/ .04
35. 8/ 21 36.
.1/ 2/ 0.
23.88
20.
89.
.51
35.7
3.07
28.17
2544.0
18.55
.816 ( 1.80)
2.77 ( 3.71)
1.11 ( .83)
10.18 ( 7.59)
919.55 ( 685.71)
6.70 ( 5.00)
.295 ( .485)
3
LAP
305.1
276.1 ( 9752.)
15.2/22/ 15.
7.7/ 2/ 8.
84.2/12/ 202.
.1/12/ 0.
82. 4/ 3/ 1.52
3.2/ 3/ .05
51. 7/ 3/ 155.
.I/ 3/ 0.
8.70
8.
193.
1.48
154.8
1.34
61.95
7463.8
81.78
2.377 ( 5.24)
10.34 ( 13.87)
.13 ( .10)
5.99 ( 4.47)
721.64 ( 538.13)
7.91 ( 5.90)
.230 ( .378)
4
NYNF
298.0
269.6 ( 9522.)
24.4/22/ 24.
7.8/ 2/ 8.
45.2/13/ 42.
.7/13/ 1.
83.5/12/ .36
12.3/12/ .04
81. 9/ I/ 24.
.7/ I/ 0.
36.11
17.
41.
.32
24.2
2.62
12.78
1599.3
12.46
.511 ( 1
2.55 ( 3
1.03 (
5.01 ( 3
627.11 ( 467
4.89 ( 3
.201 (
.13)
.42)
.76)
.74)
.64)
.64)
330)
PARTICULATE RESULTS, TOTAL FOR 4 BAGS
90MM PARTICULATE RATES
GRAMS/TEST
G/KWHR(G/HPHR)
G/KG FUEL (G/LB FUEL)
FILTER EFF.
1.39
.08 ( .06)
.33 ( .15)
77.5
-------
TABLE
ENGINE EMISSION RESULTS
H-TRANS.
PROJECT NO. 03-7338-003
ENGINE NO.
ENGINE MODEL
ENGINE 0.0 L(
CVS NO. 10
83 CUMMINS NTC-400
0. CID)
BAROMETER 742.70 MM HG(29.24 IN HG)
DRY BULB TEMP. 21.7 DEG C(71.0 DEG F)
BAG RESULTS
BAG NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
TIME SECONDS
TOTAL FLOW STD. CU. METRES(SCF)
HC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
HC BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
C02 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
C02 BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
O
' DILUTION FACTOR
^ HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
C02 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
FUEL KG (LB)
KW HR (HP HR)
BSHC G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSCO G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSC02 G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSNOX G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSFC KG/KW HR (LB/HP HR)
TOTAL TEST RESULTS 4 BAGS
TOTAL KW HR (HP HR)
BSHC G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSCO G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSC02 G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSNOX G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
6SFC KG/KW HR (LB/HP HR)
19.05 ( 25.54)
.12 (
4.69 (
769. (
7.65 (
.244 (
.09)
3.50)
573.)
5.71)
.401 )
TEST NO.JMBLH
DATE 7/11/84
TIME
DYNO NO. 5
RUN1
DIESEL EM-597-F
BAG CART NO. 1
RELATIVE HUMIDITY , ENGINE-68. PCT , CVS-62. PCT
ABSOLUTE HUMIDITY 11.2 GM/KG( 78.6 GRAINS/LB) NOX HUMIDITY C.F. 1.0000
269
16.
12.
79.
•
98.
14.
33.
1
NYNF
296.1
.3 ( 9513.)
5/22/
5/ 2/
6/13/
6/13/
0/12/
2/12/
O/ 2/
6/ 2/
28.99
4.
76.
.41
32.4
.69
23.82
2002.9
16.70
.642
2.28
.30
10.44
877.77
7.32
.281
16.
13.
79.
1.
.45
.05
33.
1.
( 1.41)
( 3.06)
( .22)
( 7.78)
( 654.55)
( 5.46)
( .462)
PART ICUL ATE
2
LANF
300.0
272.9 ( 9639.)
19.3/22/
13. 5/ 2/
80.6/13/
.6/13/
72.7/11/
8.6/11/
52. 8/ 2/
.7/ 21
20.65
6.
77.
.59
52.1
1.02
24.39
2956.3
27.22
.942
3.54
.29
6.89
834.62
7.68
.266
RESULTS,
90MM PART ICUL ATE RATES
19.
14.
80.
1.
.64
.05
53.
1.
( 2.08)
( 4.75)
( .22)
( 5.14)
( 622.37)
( 5.73)
( .437)
TOTAL FOR
277
15.
13.
73.
1.
84.
3.
53.
3
LAF
305.1
.5 ( 9802.)
2/22/
7/ 21
9/13/
1/13/
9/ 3/ 1
6/ 3/
O/ 3/ 1
I/ 3/
8.48
3.
68.
1.52
158.7
.49
21.94
7739.9
84.27
2.443
10.89
.05
2.01
710.43
7.73
.224
15.
14.
72.
1.
.57
.06
59.
0.
( 5.39)
( 14.61)
( .03)
( 1.50)
( 529.76)
( 5.77)
( .369)
4
NYNF
298.0
271.1 ( 9574.)
11.7/22/
11.8/ 2/
65.5/13/
1.1/13/
96.1/12/
14.7/12/
34. 3/ 2/
,5/ 2/
29.91
0.
61.
.39
33.8
.05
19.11
1945.8
17.54
.621
2.33
.02
8.22
836.35
7.54
.267
12.
12.
63.
1.
.44
.05
34.
1.
( 1
( 3
(
( 6
( 623
( 5
' •
.37)
.12)
.02)
.13)
.67)
.62)
439)
4 BAGS
GRAMS/TEST
G/KWHR(G/HPHR)
G/KG
FUEL
(G/LB
FUEL)
FILTER EFF.
5.11
.27 ( .
1.10 ( .
95.8
20)
50)
-------
TABLE
ENGINE EMISSION RESULTS
H-TRANS.
ENGINE NO.
ENGINE MODEL
ENGINE 0.0 L(
CVS NO. 10
83 CUMMINS NTC-400
0. CID)
O
BAROMETER 742.70 MM HG(29.24 IN HG)
DRY BULB TEMP. 21.7 DEC C(71.0 DEC F)
BAG RESULTS
BAG NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
TIME SECONDS
TOTAL FLOW STD. CU. METRES (SCF)
HC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
HC BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
C02 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
C02 BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
CO 2 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
C02 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
FUEL KG (LB)
KW HR (HP HR)
BSHC G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSCO G/KW HR (G/HP HR )
BSC02 G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSNOX G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSFC KG/KW HR ( LB/HP HR)
TOTAL TEST RESULTS 4 BAGS
TOTAL 'KW HR (HP HR)
BSHC G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSCO G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSC02 G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSNOX G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSFC KG/KW HR (LB/HP HR)
18.98 ( 25.45)
.11 (
4.82 (
773. (
8.04 (
.245 (
.08)
3.59)
577.)
6.00)
.403)
PROJECT NO. 03-7338-003
TEST NO.JMBLH
DATE 7/11/84
TIME
DYNO NO. 5
RUN2
DIESEL EM-597-F
BAG CART NO. 1
RELATIVE HUMIDITY , ENGINE-68. PCT , CVS-62. PCT
ABSOLUTE HUMIDITY 11.2 GM/KG( 78.6 GRAINS/LB) NOX HUMIDITY C.F. 1.0000
1
NYNF
296.0
269.0 ( 9500.)
14
12
83
1
95
12
32
.8/22/
.5/ 21
.6/13/
.1/13/
.6/12/
.5/12/
,4/ 2/
,4/ 21
29.97
3.
80.
.40
32.0
.43
25.03
1952.6
16.47
.626
2.27
.19
11.00
858.54
7.24
.275
15.
13.
83.
1.
.44
.04
32.
0.
( 1.38)
( 3.05)
( .14)
( 8.21)
( 640.21)
( 5.40)
( .453)
PART ICUL ATE
2
LANF
300.0
3
LAF
305.1
272.6 ( 9627.) 277.2 ( 9790.)
17.7/22/
12. 0/ 2/
81.8/13/
1.4/13/
72.7/11/
8.5/11/
54. 4/ 21
.21 2/
20.66
6.
77.
.59
54.2
.99
24.56
2955.7
28.27
.942
3.52
.28
6.98
839.75
8.03
.268
RESULTS,
90MM PART ICUL ATE RATES
18. 12.3/22/
12. 10. 5/ 21
81. 76.3/13/
1. 1.3/13/
.64 85. 5/ 3/
.05 3.6/ 3/
54. 56. 4/ 3/
0. .I/ 3/
8.41
3.
70.
1.54
168.9
.49
22.67
7794.4
89.58
( 2.08) 2.460
( 4.72) 10.87
( .21) .05
( 5.20) 2.09
( 626.20) 716.90
( 5.99) 8.24
( .440) .226
TOTAL FOR 4 BAGS
GRAMS/TEST
G/KWHR(G/HPHR)
G/KG FUEL (G/LB
FILTER EFF.
12.
11.
75.
1.
1.58
.06
169.
0.
( 5.42)
( 14.58)
( .03)
( 1.56)
( 534.59)
( 6.14)
( .372)
FUEL)
4
NYNF
297.9
270.7 ( 9561.)
10.5/22/
10. 2/ 21
66.0/13/
1.3/13/
96.6/12/
14.0/12/
35. 8/ 21
,4/ 2/
29.70
1.
61.
.40
35.4
.11
19.20
1971.4
18.34
.629
2.31
.05
8.30
852.79
7.93
.272
4.94
.26 ( .
1.06 ( .
95.5
11.
10.
64.
1.
.44
.05
36.
0.
( 1
( 3
(
( 6
( 635
( 5
' •
19)
48)
.39)
.10)
.03)
.19)
.92)
.92)
447)
-------
LE ENGINE EMISSION RESULTS
H-TRANS.
PROJECT NO. 03-7338-003
ENGINE NO.
ENGINE MODEL
ENGINE 0.0 L(
CVS NO. 10
83 CUMMINS NTC-400
0. CID)
BAROMETER 740.66 MM HG(29.16 IN HG)
DRY BULB TEMP. 25.6 DEG C(78.0 DEG F)
BAG RESULTS
BAG NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
TIME SECONDS
TOTAL FLOW STD. CU. METRES(SCF)
HC
HC
CO
CO
SAMPLE
BCKGRD
SAMPLE
BCKGRD
C02 SAMPLE
C02 BCKGRD
NOX SAMPLE
NOX BCKGRD
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PCT
METER/RANGE/PCT
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
O
DILUTION FACTOR
^ HC CONCENTRATION PPM
^ CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
C02 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
FUEL KG (LB)
KW HR (HP HR)
BSHC G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSCO G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSC02 G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSNOX G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSFC KG/KW HR (LB/HP HR)
TOTAL TEST RESULTS 4 BAGS
TOTAL KW HR (HP HR)
BSHC G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSCO G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSC02 G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSNOX G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSFC KG/KW HR (LB/HP HR)
18.98 ( 25.45)
.06 (
4.95 (
770. (
8.04 (
.244 (
.04)
3.69)
574.)
6.00)
.402)
TEST NO.JMLTH RUN1
DATE 7/11/84
TIME
DYNO NO. 5
RELATIVE HUMIDITY ,
ABSOLUTE HUMIDITY
DIESEL EM-597-F
BAG CART NO. 1
, ENGINE-46. PCT , CVS-50. PCT
9.7 GM/KG( 67.7 GRAINS/LB) NOX HUMIDITY C.F. 1.0000
1
NYNF
296.1
268.7 ( 9490.)
9
8
77
98
11
35
.11221
.O/ 21
.2/13/
.3/13/
.4/12/
.8/12/
,2/ 2/
.4/ 2/
28.88
2.
74.
.42
34.8
.31
23.12
2051.9
17.89
.656
2.29
.14
10.10
896.30
7.82
.287
10.
8.
76.
0.
.46
.04
35.
0.
2
LANF
300.0
272.2 ( 96
12.8/22/
9.0/
83.3/1
21
3/
1.0/13/
71.5/1
7.0/1
53. 9/
.3/
21
I/
I/
2/
21
.16
4.
16.)
13.
9.
83.
1.
.62
.04
54.
0.
276
6.
6.
83.
1.
84.
2.
56.
80.
•
53
25
59
.6
.66
.27
2919.3
( 1.45)
( 3.07)
( .10)
( 7.53)
( 668.37)
( 5.83)
( .471)
PART ICUL ATE
27
•
3
7
825
7
•
.92
930
.53
.19
.'5
.91
.90
263
RESULTS,
90MM PART ICUL ATE RATES
( 2
( 4
(
( 5
( 615
( 5
' •
TOTAL
.05)
.74)
.14)
.33)
.88)
.89)
433)
FOR
3
LAP
305.1
.9 ( 9782.)
6/22/
8/ 21
0/13/
2/13/
2/ 3/
6/ 3/
O/ 3/
I/ 3/
8.56
1.
78.
1.52
167.7
.10
25.09
7718.8
88.86
2.437
10.86
.01
2.31
710.44
8.18
.224
7.
7.
83.
1.
1.56
.04
168.
0.
( 5.37)
( 14.57)
( .01)
( 1.72)
( 529.77)
( 6.10)
( .369)
4
NYNF
298.0
270.4 ( 9549.)
S.8/22/
5.8/ 21
69.4/13/
1.0/13/
94.3/12/
12.3/12/
34. 9/ 21
.3/ 21
30.70
0.
65.
.39
34.6
.02
20.46
1925.3
17.90
.615
2.29
.01
8.94
841.00
7.82
.269
6.
6.
67.
1.
.43
.04
35.
0.
( 1.36)
( 3.07)
( .01)
( 6.66)
( 627.13)
( 5.83)
( .442)
4 BAGS
GRAMS/TEST
G/KWHR(G/HPHR)
G/KG
F
FUEL
(G/LB
FUEL)
ILTER EFF.
5.54
.29 ( .
1.19 ( .
96.0
22)
54)
-------
TABLE
ENGINE EMISSION RESULTS
H-TRANS.
PROJECT NO. 03-7338-003
ENGINE NO.
ENGINE MODEL
ENGINE 0.0 L(
CVS NO. 10
83 CUMMINS NTC-400
0. CID)
BAROMETER 738.63 MM HG(29.08 IN HG)
DRY BULB TEMP. 21.7 DEG C(71.0 DEC F)
BAG RESULTS
BAG NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
TIME SECONDS
TOTAL FLOW STD. CU. METRES(SCF)
HC
HC
CO
CO
SAMPLE
BCKGRD
SAMPLE
BCKGRD
C02 SAMPLE
C02 BCKGRD
NOX SAMPLE
NOX BCKGRD
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PCT
METER/RANGE/PCT
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
O
DILUTION FACTOR
M HC CONCENTRATION PPM
-> CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
C02 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
FUEL KG (LB)
KW HR (HP HR)
BSHC G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSCO G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSC02 G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSNOX G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSFC KG/KW HR (LB/HP HR)
TOTAL TEST RESULTS 4 BAGS
TOTAL KW HR (HP HR)
BSHC G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSCO G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSC02 G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSNOX G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSFC KG/KW HR (LB/HP HR)
18.81 ( 25.22)
.09 (
5.48 (
776. (
8.15 (
.247 (
.06)
4.08)
579.)
6.08)
.405)
TEST NO.JMLTH RUN4
DATE 7/12/84
TIME
DYNO NO. 5
RELATIVE HUMIDITY ,
ABSOLUTE HUMIDITY
DIESEL EM-597-F
BAG CART NO. 1
, ENGINE-56. PCT , CVS-59. PCT
9.3 GM/KG( 65.3 GRAINS/LB) NOX HUMIDITY C.F. 1.0000
267
12.
9.
86.
•
95.
11.
32.
•
1
NYNF
296.0
.3 ( 9442.)
4/22/
8/ 2/
2/13/
3/13/
3/12/
5/12/
9/ 2/
3/ 2/
30.10
3.
84.
.40
32.6
.44
26.01
1948.3
16.68
.625
2.22
.20
1 1.70
876.76
7.50
.281
12.
10.
86.
0.
.44
.04
33.
0.
( 1.38)
( 2.98)
( .15)
( 8.73)
( 653.80)
( 5.60)
( .463)
2
LANF
300.1
271.0 ( 9571.)
15.9/22/
10. 8/ 21
90.2/13/
.5/13/
71.9/11/
6.7/11/
54. 7/ 2/
.4/ 2/
20.96
6.
87.
.59
54.3
.87
27.61
2939.4
28.16
.938
3.48
.25
7.93
844.06
8.09
.269
16.
11.
91.
0.
.63
.04
55.
0.
( 2.07)
( 4.67)
( .19)
( 5.91)
( 629.41)
( 6.03)
( .443)
3
LAF
305.1
275.6 ( 9733.)
1 1.4/22/
11.0/ 21
91.2/13/
.9/13/
84. 9/ 3/
2.6/ 3/
57. 3/ 3/
.I/ 3/
8.47
2.
87.
1.54
171.6
.27
27.81
7754.1
90.47
2.450
10.83
.02
2.57
716.14
8.36
.226
11.
11.
92.
1.
1.57
.04
172.
0.
( 5.40)
( 14.52)
( .02)
( 1.92)
( 534.03)
( 6.23)
( .372)
4
NYNF
297.9
269.0 ( 9502.)
9.S/22/
9.5/ 2/
73.4/13/
1.3/13/
95.1/12/
11.6/12/
35. 3/ 2/
.3/ 2/
30.30
0.
69.
.40
35.0
.05
21.54
1952.6
18.02
.624
2.27
.02
9.47
858.52
7.92
.274
10.
10.
72.
1.
.43
.04
35.
0.
( 1
( 3
(
( 7
( 640
( 5
(
.38)
.05)
.02)
.06)
.20)
.91)
451)
PARTICIPATE RESULTS, TOTAL FOR 4 BAGS
90MM PARTICULATE RATES
GRAMS/TEST
G/KWHR(G/HPHR)
G/KG FUEL (G/LB FUEL)
FILTER EFF.
5.99
.32 ( .24)
1.29 ( .59)
100.0
-------
TABLE
ENGINE EMISSION RESULTS
H-TRANS.
PROJECT NO. 03-7338-003
ENGINE NO.
ENGINE MODEL
ENGINE 0.0 L(
CVS NO. 10
83 CUMMINS NTC-400
0. CID)
BAROMETER 742.44 MM HG(29.23 IN HG)
DRY BULB TEMP. 22.2 DEG C(72.0 DEC F)
BAG RESULTS
BAG NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
TIME SECONDS
TOTAL FLOW STD. CU. METRES(SCF)
HC SAMPLE
HC BCKGRD
CO SAMPLE
CO BCKGRD
C02 SAMPLE
C02 BCKGRD
NOX SAMPLE
NOX BCKGRD
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PCT
METER/RANGE/PCT
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
O
00
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
C02 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
FUEL KG (LB)
KW HR (HP HR)
BSHC G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSCO G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSC02 G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSNOX G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSFC KG/KW HR (LB/HP HR)
TOTAL TEST RESULTS 4 BAGS
TOTAL KW HR (HP HR)
BSHC G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSCO G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSC02 G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSNOX G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
18.77 ( 25.17)
.67 ( .50)
4.70 ( 3.51)
775. ( 578.)
8.73 ( 6.51)
TEST NO.FBL
DATE 7/13/84
TIME
DYNO NO. 5
RUN1
DIESEL EM-597-F
BAG CART NO. 1
RELATIVE HUMIDITY , ENGINE-65. PCT , CVS-56. PCT
ABSOLUTE HUMIDITY 11.2 GM/KG( 78.3 GRAINS/LB) NOX HUMIDITY C.F. 1.0000
1
NYNF
296.0
268.6 ( 9486.)
26
8
82
95
11
34
.6/22/
.3/ 2/
.1/13/.
.2/13/
.7/12/
.8/12/
.4/ 21
.3/ 21
29.86
19.
79.
.40
34.1
2.88
24.77
1964.8
17.52
.632
2.13
1.35
1 1.65
924.52
8.25
.298
27.
8.
82.
0.
.44
.04
34.
0.
( 1.39)
( 2.85)
( 1.01)
( 8.69)
( 689.42)
( 6.15)
( .489)
PARTICULATE
2
LANF
300.1
272.2 ( 9615.)
29.6/22/
9.0/ 2/
76.8/13/
.9/13/
71.8/11/
7.0/11/
57. 4/ 21
.3/ 21
21.00
21.
73.
.59
57.1
3.30
23.00
2938.0
29.74
.938
3.49
.95
6.59
841.86
8.52
.269
RESULTS,
90MM PARTICULATE RATES
30.
9.
76.
1.
.63
.04
57.
0.
( 2.07)
( 4.68)
( .71)
( 4.91)
( 627.77)
( 6.36)
( .442)
TOTAL FOR
3
LAF
305.0
276.7 ( 9773.)
26.0/22/
8.8/ 21
66.6/13/
1.0/13/
84. 4/ 3/
2.8/ 3/
61.67 3/
.I/ 3/
8.54
18.
61.
1.52
184.5
2.90
19.52
7719.3
97.68
2.438
10.92
.27
1.79
706.60
8.94
.223
4 BAGS
26.
9.
64.
1.
1.56
.04
185.
0.
( 5.37)
( 14.65)
( .20)
( 1.33)
( 526.91)
( 6.67)
( .367)
GRAMS/TEST
G/KWHR(G/HPHR)
G/KG
FUEL (G/LB
FUEL)
FILTER EFF.
4
.NYNF
297.9
270.2 ( 9544.)
30.3/22/
8.8/ 2/
71.0/137
.9/13/
93.7/12/
11.6/12/
36. 9/ 2/
.3/ 21
30.79
22.
67.
.39
36.6
3.40
20.97
1917.5
18.92
.616
2.23
1.52
9.40
859.99
8.49
.276
10.12
.54 ( .
2.19 ( .
97.1
30.
9.
69.
1.
.43
.04
37.
0.
( 1
( 2
( 1
( 7
( 641
( 6
(
40)
99)
.36)
.99)
.14)
.01)
.30)
.33)
454)
BSFC KG/KW HR (LB/HP HR) .246 ( .405)
-------
TABLE
ENGINE NO.
ENGINE MODEL
ENGINE 0.0 L(
CVS NO. 10
83 CUMMINS NTC-400
0. CID)
O
BAROMETER 741.93 MM HG(29.21 IN HG)
DRY BULB TEMP. 22.2 DEG C(72.0 DEG F)
BAG RESULTS
BAG NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
TIME SECONDS
TOTAL FLOW STD. CU. METRES(SCF)
HC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
HC BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
C02 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
C02 BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
C02 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
FUEL KG (LB)
KW HR (HP HR)
BSHC G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSCO G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSC02 G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSNOX G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSFC KG/KW HR (LB/HP HR)
TOTAL TEST RESULTS 4 BAGS
TOTAL KW HR (HP HR)
BSHC G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSCO G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSC02 G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSNOX G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
18.82 ( 25.24)
.67 ( .50)
4.47 ( 3.33)
767. ( 572.)
8.73 ( 6.51)
ENGINE EMISSION RESULTS
H-TRANS.
PROJECT NO. 03-7338-003
TEST NO.FBL
DATE 7/13/84
TIME
DYNO NO. 5
RUN2
DIESEL EM-597-F
BAG CART NO. 1
RELATIVE HUMIDITY , ENGINE-65. PCT , CVS-57. PCT
ABSOLUTE HUMIDITY 11.2 GM/KG( 78.3 GRAINS/LB) NOX HUMIDITY C.F. 1.0000
267
25.
9.
75.
•
94.
11.
35.
•
1
NYNF
296.0
.6 ( 9453.)
7/22/
O/ 2/
9/13/
2/13/
5/12/
6/12/
3/ 2/
2/ 21
30.43
17.
72.
.39
35.1
2.63
22.58
1923.9
17.97
.618
2.18
1.20
10.33
880.55
8.23
.283
26.
9.
75.
0.
.43
.0.4
35.
0.
( 1.36)
( 2.93)
( .90)
( 7.71)
( 656.63)
( 6.13)
( .465)
2
LANF
300.0
271.2 ( 9580.)
29.9/22/
9.0/ 2/
73.5/13/
.2/13/
71.8/11/
6.7/11/
59. 3/ 2/
.3/ 2/
21.02
21.
70.
.59
59.0
3.33
21 .98
2935.9
30.62
.937
3.50
.95
6.27
837.70
8.74
.267
30.
9.
72.
0.
.63
.04
59.
0.
( 2.06)
( 4.70)
( .71)
( 4.68)
( 624.67)
( 6.51)
( .439)
3
LAP
305.0
275.8 ( 9743.)
26.9/22/
7.8/ 2/
65.5/13/
.3/13/
84. I/ 3/
2.8/ 3/
61. 2/ 3/
.17 3/
8.57
20.
60.
1.52
183.3
3.19
19.27
7663.6
96.74
2.420
10.89
.29
1.77
703.42
8.88
.222
27.
8.
63.
0.
1.55
.04
184.
0.
( 5.34)
( 14.61)
( .22)
( 1.32)
( 524.54)
( 6.62)
( .365)
4
NYNF
297.8
269.3 ( 9513.)
30.4/22/
7.8/ 21
69.0/13/
.6/13/
93.6/12/
11.6/12/
37. I/ 21
.3/ 2/
30.84
23.
65.
.39
36.8
3.55
20.31
1908.1
18.97
.613
2.24
1.59
9.08
852.95
8.48
.274
30.
8.
67.
1.
.42
.04
37.
0.
( 1
( 3
( 1
( 6
( 636
( 6
(
.35)
.00)
.18)
.77)
.04)
.32)
450)
PARTICULATE RESULTS, TOTAL FOR 4 BAGS
90MM PARTICULATE RATES
GRAMS/TEST
G/KWHR(G/HPHR)
G/KG FUEL (G/LB FUEL)
FILTER EFF.
9.59
.51 ( .38)
2.09 ( .95)
97.0
BSFC KG/KW HR (LB/HP HR) .244 ( .401)
-------
TABLE
ENGINE EMISSION RESULTS
C-TRANS.
PROJECT NO. 03-7338-003
ENGINE NO.
ENGINE MODEL 83 CUMMINS NTC-400
ENGINE 0.0 L( 0. CID)
CVS NO. 10
BAROMETER 743.20 MM HG(29.26 IN HG)
DRY BULB TEMP. 24.4 DEG C(76.0 DEG F)
BAG RESULTS
BAG NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
TIME SECONDS
TOTAL FLOW STD. CU. METRES(SCF)
HC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
HC BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
C02 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
C02 BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
O
to
O
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
C02 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
FUEL KG (LB)
KW HR (HP HR)
BSHC G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSCO G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSC02 G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSNOX G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSFC KG/KW HR (LB/HP HR)
TOTAL TEST RESULTS 4 BAGS
TOTAL KW HR (HP HR)
BSHC G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSCO G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSC02 G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSNOX G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
18.28 ( 24.52)
1.42 ( 1.06)
6.75 ( 5.03)
786. ( 586.)
6.82 ( 5.08)
TEST NO.BLWOC RUN1
DATE 6/11/84
TIME
DYNO NO. 5
RELATIVE HUMIDITY ,
ABSOLUTE HUMIDITY
DIESEL EM-597-F
BAG CART NO. 1
, ENGINE-47. PCT , CVS-65. PCT
9.1 GM/KG( 63.8 GRAINS/LB) NOX HUMIDITY C.F. 1.0000
1
NYNF
296.0
269.7 ( 9526.)
20
14
84
93
12
82
.2/23/
«8/
2/
.3/13/
.1/1
.6/1
.6/1
«2/
.5/
30
3/
2/
2/
I/
I/
.24
101.
15.
84.
0.
.42
.04
24.
0.
87.
81.
9
24
13
25
38
.3
.48
.59
1893.8
12
^
1
8
15
1 181
7
•
.54
621
.60
.41
.96
.22
.82
387
( 1.37)
( 2.15)
( 6.27)
( 11.90)
( 880.84)
( 5.83)
( .637)
PART ICUL ATE
2
LANF
300.0
273.3 ( 9654.)
9.3/23/
14. 7/ 2/
48.9/12/
.1/12/
71.4/11/
7.4/11/
38. 4/ 2/
.I/ 2/
21.03
33.
100.
.58
38.3
5.13
31.71
2913.0
20.03
.936
3.12
1.64
10.15
932.31
6.41
.300
RESULTS,
47.
15.
103.
0.
.62
.04
38.
0.
( 2.
( 4.
( 1.
( 7.
( 695.
( 4.
277
7.
14.
68.
*
84.
2.
49.
06)
19)
23)
57)
22)
78)
( .492)
TOTAL
3 4
LAF NYNF
305.0 297.9
.9 ( 9816.) 271.4 ( 9584.)
3/23/
9/ 2/
3/12/
3/12/
6/ 3/
6/ 3/
3/ 3/
I/ 3/
8.46
23.
146.
1.53
147.6
3.76
47.25
7788.2
78.49
2.474
1 1.52
.33
4.10
676.00
6.81
.215
37. 7.4/23/
15. 14. O/ 2/
154. 63.8/13/
1. .3/13/
1.57 89.1/12/
.04 12.2/12/
148. 88. 7/ I/
0. .7/ I/
32.93
23.
59.
.36
26.2
3.66
18.79
1774.8
13.59
( 5.45) .570
( 15.45) 2.04
( .24) 1.80
( 3.06) 9.23
( 504.09) 871.81
( 5.08) 6.68
( .353) .280
37.
14.
61.
0.
.40
.04
26.
0.
( 1
( 2
( 1
( 6
( 650
( 4
V •
.26)
.73)
.34)
.88)
.11)
.98)
461)
FOR 4 BAGS
90MM PART ICUL ATE RATES GRAMS/TEST
G/KWHR(G/HPHR)
G/KG FUEL
Fl
(G/LB
LTER EFF.
19.33
1.06 ( .
FUEL) 4.20 ( 1.
96.6
79)
91)
BSFC KG/KW HR (LB/HP HR) .252 ( .414)
-------
T-~LE
ENGINE NO.
ENGINE MODEL
ENGINE 0.0 L(
CVS NO. 10
83 CUMMINS NTC-400
0. CID)
BAROMETER 743.20 MM HG(29.26 IN HG)
DRY BULB TEMP. 25.0 DEG C(77.0 DEC F)
BAG RESULTS
BAG NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
TIME SECONDS
TOTAL FLOW STD. CU. METRES(SCF)
HC
HC
CO
CO
SAMPLE
BCKGRD
SAMPLE
BCKGRD
C02 SAMPLE
C02 BCKGRD
NOX SAMPLE
NOX BCKGRD
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PCT
METER/RANGE/PCT
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
O DILUTION FACTOR
^ HC CONCENTRATION PPM
H CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
C02 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
FUEL KG (LB)
KW HR (HP HR)
BSHC G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSCO G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSC02 G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSNOX G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSFC KG/KW HR (LB/HP HR)
TOTAL TEST RESULTS 4 BAGS
TOTAL KW HR (HP HR)
BSHC G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSCO G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSC02 G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSNOX G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSFC KG/KW HR (LB/HP HR)
17.33 ( 23.24)
1.41 (
6.18 (
805. (
6.77 (
.257 (
1.05)
4.61)
600.)
5.05)
.423)
ENGINE EMISSION RESULTS
C-TRANS.
PROJECT NO. 03-7338-003
TEST NO.BLWOC
DATE 6/18/84
TIME
DYNO NO. 5
RUN2
DIESEL EM-597-F
BAG CART NO. 1
RELATIVE HUMIDITY , ENGINE-50. PCT , CVS-59. PCT
ABSOLUTE HUMIDITY 10.1 GM/KG( 71.0 GRAINS/LB) NOX HUMIDITY C.F. 1.0000
1
NYNF
296.7
269.9 ( 9533.)
2
LANF
300.1
273.5 ( 9662.)
3
LAF
305.2
278.2 ( 9825.)
4
NYNF
298.1
271.7 ( 9595.)
16
9
77
2
55
7
85
1
.6/23/
.5/ 2/
.9/13/
.4/13/
.5/11/
.3/11/
,3/ 1/
.I/ I/
29.46
74.
73.
.40
25.1
1 1.45
22.84
1969.8
12.94
.642
1.56
7.35
14.65
1263.92
8.30
.412
83.
to.
77.
2.
.44
.04
25.
0.
( 1.41)
( 2.09)
( 5.48)
( 10.93)
( 942.51)
( 6.19)
( .677)
8.7/23/
10. O/ 2/
94.4/13/
1.5/13/
69.5/11/
7.2/11/
37. 4/ 2/
.2/ 2/
21.88
34.
91.
.56
37.2
5.35
29.12
2802.1
19.47
.900
2.96
1.81
9.84
946.53
6.58
.304
43.
10.
96.
1.
.60
.04
37.
0.
( 1.98)
( 3.97)
( 1.35)
( 7.33)
( 705.83)
( 4.90)
( .500)
6.S/23/
10. 8/ 2/
60.9/12/ 1
.7/12/
82. 2/ 3/ 1
3.0/ 3/
45. 5/ 3/ 1
.I/ 3/
8.75
24.
126.
1.47
136.2
3.92
40.94
7512.5
72.49
2.384
10.89
.36
3.76
690.03
6.66
.219
34.
11.
34.
1.
.52
.05
37.
0.
( 5.26)
( 14.60)
( .27)
( 2.80)
( 514.56)
( 4.97)
( .360)
6
1 1
50
1
85
12
81
1
.8/23/
.O/ 2/
.1/13/
.2/13/
.4/12/
.3/12/
.7/ I/
.3/ I/
34.94
23.
45.
.33
23.9
3.66
14.24
1 666 . 2
12.44
.534
1.92
1.90
7.40
866.05
6.46
.278
34.
11.
47.
1.
.38
.04
24.
0.
( 1
( 2
( 1
( 5
( 645
( 4
( •
.18)
.58)
.42)
.52)
.82)
.82)
456)
PARTICULATE RESULTS, TOTAL FOR 4 BAGS
90MM PARTICULATE RATES
GRAMS/TEST
G/KWHR(G/HPHR)
G/KG FUEL (G/LB FUEL)
FILTER EFF.
14.98
.86 ( .64)
3.36 ( 1.52)
97.0
-------
TABLE
ENGINE NO.
ENGINE MODEL
ENGINE 0.0 L(
CVS NO. 10
83 CUMMINS NTC-400
0. CID)
BAROMETER 739.65 MM HG<29.12 IN HG)
DRY BULB TEMP. 24.4 DEG C(76.0 DEC F)
BAG RESULTS
BAG NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
TIME SECONDS
TOTAL FLOW STD. CU. METRES(SCF)
HC SAMPLE
HC BCKGRD
CO SAMPLE
CO BCKGRD
C02 SAMPLE
C02 BCKGRD
NOX SAMPLE
NOX BCKGRD
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PCT
METER/RANGE/PCT
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
O
to
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
C02 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
FUEL KG (LB)
KW HR (HP HR)
BSHC G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSCO G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSC02 G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSNOX G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSFC KG/KW HR (LB/HP HR)
TOTAL TEST RESULTS 4 BAGS
TOTAL KW HR (HP HR)
BSHC G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSCO G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSC02 G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSNOX G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSFC KG/KW HR (LR/HP HR)
14.05 ( 18.84)
1.56 ( 1.16)
8.47 ( 6.31)
906. ( 676.)
6.50 ( 4.85)
.290 ( .477)
ENGINE EMISSION RESULTS
C-TRANS.
TEST NO.BLWTC RUN1
DATE 6/ 8/84
TIME
DYNO NO. 5
PROJECT NO. 03-7338-003
DIESEL EM-597-F
BAG CART NO. 1
RELATIVE HUMIDITY , ENGINE-55. PCT , CVS-59. PCT
ABSOLUTE HUMIDITY 10.8 GM/KG( 75.3 GRAINS/LB) NOX HUMIDITY C.F. 1.0000
1
NYNF
295.9
269.1 ( 9504.)
80
1 1
81
91
11
83
.8/22/
.5/ 21
.6/13/
.6/13/
.1/12/
.3/12/
.5/ I/
.5/ I/
31.50
70.
78.
.37
24.7
10.82
24.52
1835.1
12.71
.599
1.48
7.33
16.61
1242.88
8.61
.406
81.
12.
81.
1.
.41
.04
25.
0.
( 1.32)
( 1.98)
( 5.46)
( 12.39)
( 926.81)
( 6.42)
( .667)
2
LANF
299.9
272.6 ( 9630.)
49.0/22/
11. 3/ 2/
59.7/13/
.7/13/
62. 9/1 I/
6.9/11/
95. O/ I/
.5/ I/
25.24
38.
55.
.48
28.1
6.00
17.43
2409.0
14.67
.771
2.21
2.71
7.87
1087.73
6.62
.348
49.
11.
57.
1.
.52
.04
28.
0.
( 1.70)
( 2.97)
( 2.02)
( 5.87)
( 811.12)
( 4.94)
( .573)
3
LAF
305.0
277.2 ( 9791.)
23.S/22/
9.7/ 21
89.0/12/
.4/127
77. 4/ 3/
2.9/ 3/
33. 6/ 3/
.I/ 3/
9.31
15.
207.
1.38
100.5
2.42
66.89
6987.2
53.31
2.230
8.77
.28
7.63
796.76
6.08
.254
24.
10.
218.
1.
1.42
.04
101.
0.
( 4.92)
( 11.76)
( .21)
( 5.69)
( 594.15)
( 4.53)
( .418)
4
NYNF
298.0
270.8 ( 9565.)
26.S/22/
9.5/ 2/
36.2/13/
.8/13/
79.4/12/
12.0/12/
69. 8/ I/
.8/ I/
38.57
17.
32.
.30
20.5
2.69
10.08
1497.2
10.64
.478
1.59
1.69
6.35
942.62
6.70
.301
26.
10.
34.
1.
.34
.04
21.
0.
( 1
( 2
( 1
( 4
( 702
( 4
(
.05)
.13)
.26)
.73)
.91)
.99)
495)
PARTICULATE RESULTS, TOTAL FOR 4 BAGS
90MM PART ICULATE RATES
GRAMS/TEST
G/KWHR(G/HPHR)
G/KG FUEL (G/LB FUEL)
FILTER EFF.
3.35
.24 ( .18)
.82 ( .37)
84.5
-------
TABLE
ENGINE NO.
ENGINE MODEL
ENGINE 0.0 L(
CVS NO. 10
83 CUMMINS NTC-400
0. CID)
BAROMETER 743.71 MM HG(29.28 IN HG)
DRY BULB TEMP. 23.9 DEG C(75.0 DEG F)
BAG RESULTS
BAG NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
TIME SECONDS
TOTAL FLOW STD. CU. METRES(SCF)
HC SAMPLE
HC BCKGRD
CO SAMPLE
CO BCKGRD
C02 SAMPLE
C02 BCKGRD
NOX SAMPLE
NOX BCKGRD
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PCT
METER/RANGE/PCT
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
O DILUTION FACTOR
^ HC CONCENTRATION PPM
w CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
C02 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
FUEL KG (LB)
KW HR (HP HR)
BSHC G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSCO G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSC02 G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSNOX G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSFC KG/KW HR (LB/HP HR)
TOTAL TEST RESULTS 4 BAGS
TOTAL KW HR (HP HR)
BSHC G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSCO G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSC02 G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSNOX G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
17.05 ( 22.87)
1.43 ( 1.06)
7.25 (
799. (
6.48 (
5.41)
596.)
4.83)
ENGINE EMISSION RESULTS
C-TRANS.
PROJECT NO. 03-7338-003
TEST NO.BLOT
DATE 6/20/84
TIME
DYNO NO. 5
RUN1
DIESEL EM-597-F
BAG CART NO. t
RELATIVE HUMIDITY , ENGINE-56. PCT , CVS-62. PCT
ABSOLUTE HUMIDITY 10.6 GM/KG( 74.4 GRAINS/LB) NOX HUMIDITY C.F. 1.0000
1
NYNF
296.0
271.2 ( 9578.)
2
LANF
300.0
274.9 ( 9709.)
3
LAF
305.1
279.5 ( 9871.)
4
NYNF
298.0
272.9 ( 9640.)
16
10
68
87
12
74
,2/23/
.8/ 21
.3/13/
.1/13/
.8/12/
.7/12/
,7/ I/
.I/ I/
33.16
71.
64.
.35
22.2
11.07
20.34
1726.6
11.51
.564
1.60
6.94
12.74
1081.98
7.21
.353
81.
11.
66.
0.
.39
.04
22.
0.
( 1.24)
( 2.14)
( 5.17)
( 9.50)
( 806.83)
( 5.38)
( .581)
9.1/23/
10. 5/ 2/
82.9/13/
.2/13/
66.9/11/
7.6/11/
32. 4/ 2/
.I/ 2/
23.11
36.
80.
.53
32.3
5.64
25.51
2644.6
16.99
.849
2.74
2.05
9.30
963.73
6.19
.309
46.
11.
82.
0.
.57
.04
32.
0.
( 1.87)
( 3.68)
( 1.53)
( 6.93)
( 718.65)
( 4.62)
( .509)
6.6/23/
10. O/ 2/
86.9/12/
.3/12/
83. 3/ 3/
3.0/ 3/
43. 8/ 3/
.I/ 3/
8.58
24.
200.
1.50
131.1
3.86
65.12
7665.5
70. -11
2.444
10.78
.36
6.04
711 .39
6.51
.227
33.
10.
211.
1.
1.54
.05
131.
0.
( " 5.39)
( 14.45)
( .27)
( 4.51)
( 530.49)
( 4.85)
( .373)
6.7/23/
10. O/ 2/
43.9/13/
. 1 / 1 3/
82.5/12/
12.4/12/
77. 3/ I/
,7/ I/
36.59
24.
40.
.32
22.8
3.76
12.67
1589.0
1 1.90
.509
1.94
1.94
6.54
819.56
6.14
.263
34.
10.
41.
0.
.36
.04
23.
0.
(
(
(
(
( 61
(
(
1.12)
2.60)
1.44)
4.87)
1 .14)
4.58)
.432)
PARTICULATE RESULTS, TOTAL FOR 4 BAGS
90MM PARTICULATE RATES
GRAMS/TEST
G/KWHR(G/HPHR)
G/KG FUEL (G/LB FUEL)
FILTER EFF.
16.69
.98 ( .73)
3.82 ( 1.73)
96.7
BSFC KG/KW HR (LB/HP HR) .256 ( .421)
-------
ENGINE NO.
ENGINE MODEL
ENGINE 0.0 L(
CVS NO. 10
83 CUMMINS NTC-400
0. CID)
BAROMETER 742.70 MM HG(29.24 IN HG)
DRY BULB TEMP. 23.9 DEC CC75.0 DEC F)
BAG RESULTS
BAG NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
TIME SECONDS
TOTAL FLOW STD. CU. METRES(SCF)
HC
HC
CO
CO
SAMPLE
BCKGRD
SAMPLE
BCKGRD
C02 SAMPLE
C02 BCKGRD
NOX SAMPLE
NOX BCKGRD
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PCT
METER/RANGE/PCT
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
O
to
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
C02 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
FUEL KG (LB)
KW HR (HP HR)
BSHC G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSCO G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSC02 G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSNOX G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSFC KG/KW HR (LB/HP HR)
TOTAL TEST RESULTS 4 BAGS
TOTAL KW HR (HP HR)
BSHC G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSCO G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSC02 G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSNOX G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSFC KG/KW HR (LB/HP HR)
LE ENGINE EMISSION RESULTS
C-TRANS.
18.75 ( 25.15)
1.38 ( 1.03)
5.03 ( 3.75)
779. ( 581.)
7.30 ( 5.45)
.249 ( .409)
PROJECT NO. 03-7338-003
TEST NO.RBLC
DATE 6/22/84
TIME
DYNO NO. 5
RUN1
DIESEL EM-597-F
BAG CART NO. 1
RELATIVE HUMIDITY , ENGINE-52. PCT , CVS-58. PCT
ABSOLUTE HUMIDITY 9.9 GM/KG( 69.1 GRAINS/LB) NOX HUMIDITY C.F. 1.0000
1
NYNF
296.0
269.6 ( 9522.)
16.5/23/
8.5/ 2/
78.0/13/
.7/13/
94.6/12/
12.2/12/
90. 21 I/
.9/ I/
29.99
74.
74.
.39
26.6
11 .54
23.31
1930.9
13.70
.630
1.89
6.12
12.36
1023.46
7.26
.334
82.
9.
77.
1.
.43
.04
27.
0.
( 1.39)
( 2.53)
( 4.56)
( 9.21)
( 763.19)
( 5.42)
( .549)
2
LANF
300.0
273.2 ( 9651.)
8.9/23/
9.0/ 2/
83.0/13/
1.0/13/
72.8/tl/
7.2/11/
46. 8/ 2/
.21 2/
20.52
36.
79.
.60
46.6
5.69
25.18
3007.3
24.36
.963
3.36
1.69
7.49
894.21
7.24
.286
45.
9.
83.
1.
.64
.04
47.
0.
( 2.12)
( 4.51)
( 1.26)
( 5.58)
( 666.81)
( 5.40)
( .471)
3
LAP
305.0
277.9 ( 9816.)
7.3/23/
9.8/ 21
85.0/13/
1.5/13/
85. 3/ 3/ 1
3. I/ 3/
51. 9/ 3/ 1
.I/ 3/
8.42
28.
79.
1.54
155.4
4.48
25.72
7828.7
82.64
2.477
1 1.28
.40
2.28
693.88
7.32
.220
37.
10.
85.
1.
1.58
.05
156.
0.
( 5.46)
( 15.13)
( .30)
( 1.70)
( 517.43)
( 5.46)
( .361)
4
NYNF
297.9
271.3 ( 9582.)
7.3/23/ 36.
10. O/ 21 10.
69.7/13/ 68.
2.4/13/ 2.
91.9/12/ .41
13.3/12/ .05
32. I/ 2/ 32.
.8/ 2/ 1.
31.56
27.
64.
.37
31.3
4.16
20.20
1840.1
16.26
.592 (
2.22 (
1.87 (
9.09 (
828.08 ( 61
7.32 (
.267 (
1.31)
2.98)
1.40)
6.78)
7.50)
5.45)
.438)
PARTICULATE RESULTS, TOTAL FOR 4 BAGS
90MM PARTICULATE RATES
GRAMS/TEST
G/KWHR(G/HPHR)
G/KG FUEL (G/LB FUEL)
FILTER EFF.
12.79
.68 ( .51)
2.74 ( 1.24)
96.0
-------
TABLE
ENGINE NO.
ENGINE MODEL
ENGINE 0.0 L(
CVS NO. 10
83 CUMMINS NTC-400
0. CID)
BAROMETER 741.17 MM HG(29.18 IN HG)
DRY BULB TEMP. 23.9 DEG C(75.0 DEG F)
BAG RESULTS
BAG NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
TIME SECONDS
TOTAL FLOW STD. CU. METRES(SCF)
HC
HC
CO
CO
SAMPLE
BCKGRD
SAMPLE
BCKGRD
C02 SAMPLE
C02 BCKGRD
NOX SAMPLE
NOX BCKGRD
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PCT
METER/RANGE/PCT
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
0 DILUTION FACTOR
I HC CONCENTRATION PPM
^ CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
C02 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
FUEL KG (LB)
KW HR (HP HR)
BSHC G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSCO G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSC02 G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSNOX G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSFC KG/KW HR (LB/HP HR)
TOTAL TEST RESULTS 4 BAGS
TOTAL KW HR (HP HR)
BSHC G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSCO G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSC02 G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSNOX G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSFC KG/KW HR (LB/HP HR)
15.85 ( 21.26)
1.43 ( 1.06)
5.38)
636.)
5.09)
7.22
853. (
6.83 (
.273 (
ENGINE EMISSION RESULTS
C-TRANS.
TEST NO.BLSTC RUN1
DATE 7/ 2/84
TIME 1:55
DYNO NO. 5
PROJECT NO. 03-7338-003
DIESEL EM-597-F
BAG CART NO. 1
RELATIVE HUMIDITY , ENGINE-53. PCT , CVS-63. PCT
ABSOLUTE HUMIDITY 10.1 GM/KG( 70.6 GRAINS/LB) NOX HUMIDITY C.F. 1.0000
1
NYNF
296.1
268.9 ( 9497.)
81
8
76
92
12
82
.8/22/
.O/ 2/
.2/13/
.6/13/
.1/12/
.1/12/
.8/ I/
.4/ I/
31.09
74.
72.
.38
24.5
11.48
22.64
1850.4
12.61
.604
1.54
7.44
14.67
1 198.78
8.17
.391
82.
8.
75.
1.
.42
.04
25.
0.
( 1.33)
( 2.07)
( 5.55)
( 10.94)
( 893.93)
( 6.09)
( .643)
PART ICUL ATE
2
LANF
300.1
272.4 ( 9621.)
41.4/22/
9. I/ 2/
62.9/13/
.7/13/
65. 3/1 I/
7.1/11/
98. I/ I/
.3/ I/
24.00
33.
58.
.51
29.1
5.14
18.42
2540.2
15.16
.812
2.41
2.13
7.65
1054.62
6.29
.337
RESULTS,
90MM PART ICUL ATE RATES
41.
9.
61.
1.
.55
.04
29.
0.
( 1
( 3
( 1
( 5
( 786
( 4
<
TOTAL
.79)
.23)
.59)
.70)
.43)
.69)
554)
FOR
3
LAF
300.5
277.4 ( 9797.)
26.0/22/
9.0/ 2/
81.8/12/
.1/12/
82. O/ 3/
3.3/ 3/
43. 2/ 3/
.I/ 3/
8.75
18.
185.
1.47
129.3
2.88
59.73
7449.2
68.63
2.373
10.08
.29
5.92
738.87
6.81
.235
4 BAGS
26.
9.
195.
0.
1.51
.05
130.
0.
( 5.23)
( 13.52)
( .21)
( 4.42)
( 550.98)
( 5.08)
( .387)
GRAMS/TEST
G/KWHR(G/HPHR)
G/KG
FUEL (G/LB
FUEL)
FILTER EFF.
4
NYNF
298.0
270.5 ( 9555.)
2S.7/22/
9.0/ 2/
47.6/13/
.1/13/
86.2/12/
11.9/12/
77. 9/ I/
.8/ 1/
34.59
20.
43.
.34
22.9
3.11
13.68
1689.2
11.87
.541
1.82
1.71
7.52
928.37
6.53
.297
3.02
.19 ( .
.70 ( .
82.2
29.
9.
45.
0.
.38
.04
23.
0.
( 1
( 2
( 1
( 5
( 692
( 4
' •
14)
32)
.19)
.44)
.27)
.61)
.29)
.87)
488)
.449)
-------
TABLE
ENGINE EMISSION RESULTS
C-TRANS.
PROJECT NO. 03-7338-003
ENGINE NO.
ENGINE MODEL
ENGINE 0.0 L(
CVS NO. 10
83 CUMMINS NTC-400
0. CID)
BAROMETER 742.70 MM HG(29.24 IN HG)
DRY BULB TEMP. 22.2 DEG C(72.0 DEG F)
BAG RESULTS
BAG NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
TIME SECONDS
TOTAL FLOW STD. CU. METRES(SCF)
HC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
HC BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
C02 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
C02 BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
O
I
to
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
C02 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
FUEL KG (LB)
KW HR (HP HR)
BSHC G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSCO G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSC02 G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSNOX G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSFC KG/KW HR (LB/HP HR)
TOTAL TEST RESULTS 4 BAGS
TOTAL KW HR (HP HR)
BSHC G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSCO G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSC02 G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSNOX G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
18.55 ( 24.87)
.57 ( .42)
4.07)
607.)
5.53)
5.46 (
814. (
7.41
TEST NO.JMBLC RUN1
DATE 7/11/84
TIME
DYNO NO. 5
RELATIVE HUMIDITY ,
ABSOLUTE HUMIDITY
DIESEL EM-597-F
BAG CART NO. 1
, ENGINE-51. PCT , CVS-62. PCT
8.7 GM/KG( 61.2 GRAINS/LB) NOX HUMIDITY C.F. 1.0000
1
NYNF
296.2
269.1 ( 9506.)
1 1
16
97
60
12
33
1
.7/23/
.2/ 21
.0/13/
.6/13/
.0/1 I/
.2/12/
.6/ 2/
,4/ I/
26.63
43.
95.
.45
33.2
6.64
29.84
2208.1
17.10
.715
1.93
3.44
15.45
1 143.28
58.
16.
99.
1.
.49
.04
34.
0.
( 1.58)
( 2.59)
( 2.56)
( 11.52)
( 852.54)
8.85 ( 6.60)
.370
( .609)
PART ICUL ATE
2
LANF
300.2
272.6 ( 9628.) 277
6.S/23/
15.5/ 2/
85.2/13/
.7/13/
74.0/11/
7.1/11/
47. I/ 21
.3/ 2/
20.08
17.
82.
.62
46.8
2.66
25.93
3080.7
24.41
.983
3.38
.79
7.67
911.98
7.23
.291
RESULTS,
90MM PART ICUL ATE RATES
32. 4.
16. 14.
85. 87.
1. 1.
.66 85.
.04 2.
47. 49.
0.
( 2.17)
( 4.53)
( .59)
( 5.72)
( 680.07)
( 5.39)
( .479)
3
LAF
305.2
.1 ( 9788.)
1/23/ 21.
8/ 21 15.
1/13/ 87.
0/13/ 1.
2/ 3/ 1.58
7/ 3/ .04
6/ 3/ 149.
I/ 3/ 0.
8.44
7.
82.
1.54
148.5
1.20
26.47
7823.0
78.74
2.472 ( 5.45)
10.92 ( 14.64)
.11 ( .08)
2.42 ( 1.81)
716.59 ( 534.36)
7.21 ( 5.38)
.226 ( .372)
4
NYNF
298.0
270.5 ( 9554.)
2.4/23/
12. O/ 2/
65.0/13/
1.0/13/
95.6/12/
11.7/12/
33. 6/ 2/
.4/ 21
30.13
0.
60.
.40
33.2
.04
18.94
1977.5
17.19
.631
2.32
.02
8.17
852.68
7.41
.272
12.
12.
63.
1.
.44
.04
34.
0.
( 1
( 3
(
( 6
( 635
( 5
' •
.39)
.11)
.01)
.09)
.84)
.53)
447)
TOTAL FOR 4 BAGS
GRAMS/TEST
G/KWHR(G/HPHR)
G/KG FUEL
(G/LB FUEL)
FILTER EFF.
6.95
.37 ( .
1.45 ( .
95.8
28)
66)
BSFC KG/KW HR (LB/HP HR) .259 ( .426)
-------
TECHNICAL REPORT DATA
(Please read Instructions on the reverse before completing)
1. REPORT NO.
EPA 460/3-84-008
2.
4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE
Heavy-Duty Engine Exhaust Particulate Trap Evaluat:
7. AUTHOR(S)
Charles M. Urban
9. PERFORMING ORG '\NIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS
Southwest Research Institute
6220 Culebra Road
San Antonio, Texas 78284
12. SPONSORING AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS
Environmental Protection Agency
2565 Plymouth Raod
Ann Arbor, Michigan 48105
1S. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES
3. RECIPIENT'S ACCESSION>NO.
6. REPORT DATE
pnn September 1984
6. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE
8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NO.
10. PROGRAM ELEMENT NO.
11. CONTRACT/GRANT NO.
68-03-3162 Work Assign, No.. 3
13. TYPE OF REPORT AND PERIOD COVERED
Final (7/25/83 - 7/25/84)
14. SPONSORING AGENCY CODE
16. ABSTRACT
This report describes a laboratory effort to evaluate several aspects of
the use of exhaust particulate traps with heavy-duty diesel engines. The
effort involved: monitoring exhaust temperatures in heavy-duty vehicles
operating on a chassis dynamometer; design and evaluation of a particualte
trap bypass system; regeneration of particulate traps; and exhaust emissions
evaluations of a heavy-duty diesel engine, with and without exhaust particu-
late traps.
17.
a. DESCRIPTORS
Air Pollution
Exhaust Emissions
Diesel Engines
18. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT
Release Unlimited
KEY WORDS AND DOCUMENT ANALYSIS
b.lDENTIFI
Heavy-
Partic
Cont
19. SECURI
Uncl
20. SECURI
Uncl
ERS/OPEN ENDED TERMS C. COSATI Field/Group
Duty Engines
ulate Emissions
rol
TY CLASS (This Report) 21. NO. OF PAGES
assified 66
TY CLASS (This page) 22. PRICE
assified
EPA Form 2220-1 (9-73)
-------