PB85-167948
    Gaseous and Particulate Emissions from
    Gasoline- and Diesel-Powered  Heavy-Duty Trucks
     (U.S.)  Environmental Protection  Agency
    Reserch Triangle Park, NC
    Feb  85
                                          «B£
  . Department of Ccmmsrce
ESsfenal Tedma! Information Service

-------
                                                 PE85-1679U8
                                      EPA/600/D-85/037
                                      February 1985
Gaseous and Particulate Emissions  from  Gasoline-
      and Diesel-Powered Heavy-Duty  Trucks
                       by


                James N.  Braddock
                      and
                  Ned  Perry
    ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES RESEARCH LABORATORY
       OFFICE OF RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
      U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
        RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK, NC 27711

-------
                                   TECHNICAL REPORT DATA
                            {Please read Instructions on Ihe reverse before completing
\. REPORT NO.

   EPA/600/D-85/037
                             2.
                                                           3. RECIPIENT'S ACCESSION NO.
4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE
   GASEOUS AND PARTICIPATE EMISSIONS FROM GASOLINE-
   AND DIESEL-POWERED HEAVY-DUTY TRUCKS
             5. REPORT DATE
               February  1985
             6. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE
7. AUTHORIS)
   James N.  Braddock, USEPA
   Ned Perry,  Northrop Services, Inc.
                                                           8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NO.
9. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS
   Atmospheric  Sciences Research Laboratory
   Office of  Research and Development
   U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
   Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711
                                                           1O. PROGRAM ELEMENT NO.
                  C9YA1C/ 01-2076 (TY-85)
             II. CONTRACT/GRANT NO.
12. SPONSORING AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS
   Atmospheric  Sciences Research Laboratory - RTP, N.C.
   Office of  Research and Development
   U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
   Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711
                                                           13. TYPE OF REPORT AND PERIOD COVERED
             14. SPONSORING AGENCY COOt
                  EPA/600/09
15. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES
16. ABSTRACT
   Gaseous  and participate  emission  rates  from seven  class 2B,  one class  5  and six
   class  6  heavy-duty  gasoline-  and  diesel-powered  trucks  were  determined  using
   transient chassis  dynamometer test procedures.  All  vehicles were tested at approx-
   imately  7Q%  of their rated gross vehicle weight over the Heavy-Duty Transient Cycle
   and  the  Durham  Road Route  driving cycles.   The sensitivity of  emission rates to
   vehicle  configuration,  engine design, and driving cycle  characteristics was examin-
   ed.   Emissions  characterization  included  total   hydrocarbons,  carbon  monoxide,
   oxides of  nitrogen, fuel  economy, total particulate matter,  particulate organics,
   inert  material,  particle  size  less  than  2p,  and  lead,   bromine,  and chlorine
   analyses.  All  class  28 truck emission  rates were  less than class  5  or  6  truck
   emission rates.   Hydrocarbon and  carbon  monoxide   emissions and  fuel  consumption
   were  significantly higher with  the  gasoline trucks than with the diesel  trucks.
   Total  particulate.  particulate   organics,   and  inert  material  emissions  were
   significantly  gre_ ^r with the diesel trucks.  Hydrocarbons, carbon monoxide, total
   particulate  emissions,  and  fuel  consumption  were  sensitive  to the characteristics
   of the transient driving cycles.
17.
                                KEY WORDS AND DOCUMENT ANALYSIS
                  DESCRIPTORS
b.lDENTIFIERS/OPEN ENDED TERMS  c. COSATI Field/Group
18. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT


     RELEASE TO PUBLIC
19. SECURITY CLASS (Ttl-.l Reportl
  UNCLASSIFIED
21. NO. OF PAGES
   94
20. SECURITY CLASS (Tllil?oge>

  UNCLASSIFIED
                           22. PRICE
EPA Fern 2220-1 (R*v. 4-77)   rncvioui COITION i» OBIOLCTC .

-------
                      NOTICE

This document has been reviewed in accordance with
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency policy and
approved for publication.  Mention of trade names
or commercial products does not constitute endorse-
ment or recommendation for use.                    ;
                       ii

-------
ABSTRACT

     Gaseous and  particulate  emission  rates  from seven class 2B, one  class  5
and six class 6 heavy-duty gasoline- and diesel-powered trucks were  determined
using transient chassis dynamometer test procedures.   All  vehicles were tested.
at approximately  70% of  their rated gross vehicle weight over  the  Heavy-Duty
Transient Cycle and the  Durham Road  Route  driving  cycles.   The  sensitivity of
emission  rates  to  vehicle  configuration, engine  design,  and  driving  cycle
characteristics  was  examined.    Emissions  characterization  included  total
hydrocarbons,  carbon  monoxide,   oxides  of   nitrogen,  fuel economy,  total
particulate  matter,   CH-Cl,,   %-extractables,  particulate  organics,   inert
material,  particle  size  less   than 2u,  and  lead,  bromine,   and  chlorine
analyses. All class 2B truck  emission  rates were less  than  class  5  or  6. truck
emission   rates.    Hydrocarbon   and  carbon  monoxide  emissions  arid   fuel
consumption were  significantly higher  with the  gasoline trucks than with  the
diesel  trucks.   Total  particulate,  particulate  organics,  and   inert  material
emissions were  significantly  greater with the  diesel  trucks. .  Hydrocarbons,
carbon  monoxide,  total   particulate emissions,  and  fuel   consumption  were
sensitive to the characteristics  of the transient driving cycles.
                                      iii

-------
THIS STUDY  IS  A CONTINUATION OF WORK  begun  at EPA-Research Triangle  Park  in



1982  that   investigated   gaseous   and  particulate  emissions   from   in-use



heavy-duty  gasoline  trucks.  This  initial gasoline  truck investigation  was



subsequently reported by Black et^ ajL  in 1984 (1)*.   The current study  is also



a follow-up to  other EPA-sponsored  transient  chassis  truck studies  (2-4) that



are designed  to enhance our  knowledge  of  heavy-duty mobile source  emissions



and  their  contributions  to  national  ambient  air  quality  degradation  (5).



Heavy-duty  highway vehicles  have  significant impact  upon the  gaseous  and



particulate emissions  totals  from  all  highway mobile sources.   That is, with



respect  to  gaseous  emissions,  heavy-duty  vehicles were  responsible  for  an



estimated 10:5 of total  hydrocarbon (HC) emissions, 15% of carbon monoxide (CO)



emissions,  and  34% of  oxides of nitrogen  (NO  ) emissions  from highway mobile
                                             A


sources  in   1980   (6).   With  respect   to  particulate  emissions,  heavy-duty



vehicles  were  responsible   for  an   estimated   44%   of  all   engine-related



particulate matter from highway mobile  sources  in  1977 (7).   Clearly,  then,



the  pollution   contribution  from  heavy-duty  vehicles  is  important  and  this



study will expand  the  limited data  base  on which  air  quality impact  estimates



are based.
*Numbers in parentheses designate references at end of paper.

-------
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURE

     VEHICLE SELECTION—The trucks selected for this study normally operate in
stop-and-go  (i.e.,  transient  mode)  driving patterns in  urban  environments as
delivery vehicles  and include seven  class  2B, one class  5,  and six class  6
trucks.   Trucks  are  commonly  classified  according  to  the  Motor  Vehicle
Manufacturers'  Association  (MVMA)  truck  classification  scheme  that  divides
trucks into  various  classes based on  their  rated  gross vehicle weights  (GVW).
For example, a class 2B truck has a GVW rating of 8501 to 10,000  Ib; a class 5
truck has a  GVW rating of 16,001 to 19,500 Ib; and a  class 6  truck has  a  GVW
rating cf 19,501 to 26,000 Ib.  The class 2B vehicles (pickups and  snail  vans)
are usually  employed  in  lighter-duty  commercial operation  than the  class 5 or
6  vehicles,  which  are  generally  involved  in  m'-re  medium-duty  commercial
applications.   On  a  sales-weighted  basis,  class  2B  and  class  6   trucks  are
ai.icng the most popular, and, therefore were acquired for test  pruposes in this
investigation.   The  test fleet was composed  of six  gasoline  trucks and  eight
diesei  trucks,  all  of  which v/ere  local  rental  or  loan   vehicles.    The
dynamometer  inertia  setting  for all  vehicles  was  approximately  70%  of  rated
GVW,  and  all  vehicles  were  tested  as received  (i.e.,  no  maintenance  was
performed on them).
     The gasoline  truck fleet, described  in  Table 1, was comprised of four
class 2B vans,  one class 5  van,  and one class  6 stake-bed truck.   All  were
equipped with  medium-size V-8 engines  equipped  with  two-barrel  carburetors.
The  class  2B  Ford  350  delivery vans  had aerodynamically  designed  chassis
(i.e., rounded  vertical  and horizontal edges).   This  type of design reduced
the  aerodynamic-drag   component   of  road   load   relative   to   that   of  a
nonaerodynamically  designed  (i.e.,  squared edges  on  a  large frontal  area)

-------
Table 1.   Gasoline Test Vehicle Description
Manufacturer
Ford F350

Ford F350

Plymouth Voyager

Plymouth Voyager

Ford 600 "


General Motors

Vehicle
10
FUH413

F2H411

VOY285

VOY338

F3H633


G63333

Class
Type
28

28

2B

28

5


6

Chassis
Type
1979
Van
1978
Van
1982
Van
1983
Van
1972
Van

1975
Stake-bed
Engine Type
V-3, 330 in3 (5.4;)
2bbl carburetor
V-8, 330 in3 (5.4?)
2bbl carburetor
V-8, 360 in3 (5.90
2bbl carburetor
V-8. 360 in3 (5.9t)
2bbl carburetor
V-8, 330 in3 (5.4t)
2bbl carburetor

V-8, 350 in3 (5.7j)
2bbl carburetor
Odometer
miles
38,061

54,415

47,386

23,561

5,327


37,000

GVW,
Ibs
9,900

9,900

8,510

8,510

17,900


25,080

Dynamomete1"
Inertia Road
setting, Load HP
Ibs 0 50 mph
7,080 41.0

7,080 41.0

6,032 35.5

6,032 35.5

12.830 67.5


16,378 50.4

Special
Comments
Aerodynamic
design
Aerodynamic
design




Large frontal
area (non-
aerodynamic)



-------
chassis.  The two class 2B Plymouth vans had a 15-passenger carrying  capacity.
The  class   5  Ford  600  van  had  th?  largest  frontal  area  (i.e.,   greatest
aerodynamic  drag)  of. any vehicle  tested,  hence  its  dynamometer  road-load
horsepower  setting was  also  the greatest.   Coupled with its  relatively  large
inertia weight setting  of  12,830  Ibs,  the  motor in the Ford  600 Van,  a  small
330 in  V-8,  had to work  very  hard to maintain  the  prescribed speed of  the
truck driving cycles.
     The diesel  truck  fleet,  described in  Table  2,  was  comprised  of  three
class 2B vehicles  (one van and two  pickups)  and five class  6  vehicles  (four
stake-beds and one flat-bed).  It should be  noted that one  of the  stake-beds,
vehicle CDl/786, was  tested twice  in the test program, approximately  2 months
apart.  Hence,  the test designations  are  CDW786A  and  CDW786B.  The  vehicle
behaved or drove  differently  during  the  second  test;  it  seemed  harder  to
drive, had less power, and used a  fair amount of coolant.   When the second  set
of tests was completed, an engine  teardown  of this vehicle  indicated  a leaking
head gasket.  The class 2B van, FDW112, had  a very  high  lubricant  consumption
rate, especially in  view of  its  newness (1983  model) and  low  mileage (2,040
mi).  Compared to the gasoline V-8 engines,  the  diesel V-8  engines were  quite
a  bit  larger and,  therefore,  had significantly  more reserve  horsepower  for
keeping up  with  the driving cycles  (none  had  any  problem).   All  the diesel
vehicles,  except for the Ford 7000 flat-bed (FDB420),  had naturally aspirated,
indirect-injection-type  diesel  engines.   FDB420  had  the   only   naturally
aspirated, direct-injection,  heavy-duty diesel engine  in  the test fleet.
     TEST FUEL--Table 3  lists  the properties of the  two test fuels.   Vehicle
operation  with their respective fuel(s) was  satisfactory over the  two driving

-------
                                      Table 2.  Diesel Test Vehicle Description
Manufacturer
Ford
Chevrolet
Ford 250
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Ford F600
r'ord 7000
Chevrolet
Vehicle
10
(DW112
CDR734
FDP387
CDW786A
CDW780
FDW161
FOB420
CDW786B
Class
Type
2B
2B
28
6
6
6
6
6
Chassis
Type
1983
Van
1984
Pick-up
1984
Pick-up
1981
Stake-bed
1981
Steke-bed
1984
Stake-bed
1977
Flat-bed
1981
Stake-bed
Engine type and
manufacturer*
V-8. 425 in3 (6.9e)
International Harvester
V-8, 379 in3 (6.2()
Detroit Diesel Allison
V-8, 425 in3 (6.9e)
International Harvester
V-8, 500 in3 (8.2()
Detroit Diesel Allison
V-8. 500 in3 (8.2t)
Detroit Diesel Allison
V-8, 500 in3 (8.2s)
Detroit Diesel Allison
V-8, 636 in3 (10. 4«)
Caterpillar 3208
V-8, 500 in3 (8.2t)
Detroit Diesel Al 1 ison
Odometer
miles
2,040
2,662
11,342
63,914
68,235
6,948
85,244
68,330
GVW.
Ibs
9,100
8,600
8,600'
23,160
23,160
19.7UO
24,000
23,160
Dynamometer
Inertia Road
setting, Load HP
Ibs 0 50 mph
6,445 35.0
6,095 31.6
6,095 32.6
16,512 56.0
16,512 56.0
13,940 59.9
16,930 61.4
16,512 56.0
Special
Comments
High lubricant
consumption





Direct injection
engine
Leaking head
gasket
All vehicles, except FDB420, had naturally aspirated,  indirect-injection  type  diesel engines.
FDB420 had a naturally aspirated, direct-irjection diesel  engine.

-------
Table 3.  Test Fuel Description
Leaded Regular Gasoline
Lead, g/gal
Sulfur, wt. %
Density, g/cc
RVP, PSI
Octane, (R+M)/?
Distillation Temp.
30%
38"-
68%
90%
EP
% Recovery
% Residue

GC Analysis:
Aroma tics %
Olefins %
Saturates %
Carbon, wt. %
Hydrogen, wt. %
1.29
0.060
0.7208
10.5
88.8
(oF)
149
171
244
374
540
98.0
1.0


19.5
18.6
61.9
86.6
13.4
Premium Diesel Fuel
Type
Sulfur, wt. %
Density, g/cc
API Gravity
Cetane number
Distil lation Temp. , (
IBP
1 0'"
50*
90%
EP
FIA Analysis
Aroma tics 5,
Olefins i
Saturates %

Carbon, wt. *
Hydrogen, wt. %


2-D
0.18
0.8551
33.9
46.0
°F)
357
41'8
509
597
638

39.9
2.0
58.1

86.6
12.8



-------
cycles.  These fuels are typical of fuels used in normal  vehicle operation and
were obtained locally.

TEST PROCEDURES

     DRIVING  CYCLE  AND  TEST   SCHEDULE—The   heavy-duty   transient  chassis
dynamometer test procedure is based on  the  EPA Recommended Practice of France
et ^1_.  (8).   The EPA  Recommended  Practice  identifies a heavy-duty transient
cycle  (HDTC)  that  is  derived  from  Mew York  Nonfreeway  (NYMFj, Los  Angales
Nonfreeway (LAMP),and  Los  Angeles  Freeway  (LAF) driving patterns.  Subsequent
smoothing of unrealistic speed-time trace fluctuations were  made according to
the  procedure  of Black j^t  al.   (1).   The   smoothed  HDTC  speed-time trace  is
depicted  in  Figure  1.  The  HDTC  consists of  a   cold  start  followed  by  a
20-minute soak  and  then a  hot  start.   Four  individual  driving  schedules  or
"bags"  (NYMF,  LANF, LAF, and UYNF)  are included  in both  the  cold-start  and
hot-start portions  of  the  test  as described  in Table 4.  Characteristics  of
the HDTC  include an  overall  length of 5.55  mi, an  average speed of 18.9 mph
and 32.9% of time  spent  at  idle.  Another  driving  cycle,  the  locally  derived
Durham  Road  Route   (DRR),  was   also  used  in  this  study  (1).   A  complete
description of the  DRR is  provided in Figure  1 and  Table  4.  Characteristics
of the DRR include an overall  length of 6.37 mi, an average speed of 24.7 mph,
and 11.8% of time spent at idle.
     The truck study test schedule is described in  Table  5.  Each truck needed
a minimum period of two weeks to complete the desired test  schedule: the first
week for the HDTC and the second week for the DRR.
     CHASSIS DYNAMOMETER  AND FACILITY—A   Burku  Porter  Model   1059  electric
drive chassis dynamometer was used for  inertia and road-load simulation.  The

-------
CO
              CO
           t   40

           d
           UJ
           IU

           Si   30
           u
           ^
           u

           5   20
           >



              10
                 -   HEAVY DUTY TRANSIENT CYCLE
              60
              GO
           |  40
          S   30

          UJ

          U

          X   pO
          UJ
          >




              10
                 -   DURHAM flOAD ROUTE
                                  I     •   ll
                         100
                                                           000



                                                         TIME, !»;c
                                                                             700
                                                                                              900
                                                                                                               1100
                         100
                                          300
                                                           DOO
                                                         TIME, toe
                                                                             700
                                                                                              900
                                                                                                               1100
                                    Figure 1.   HDTC and  DRR  Driving Cycles

-------
Table 4.  Driving Cycle Specifications
Cycle
Description
Heavy Du'.y Transient
Cycle (HDTC)
HDTC composite driving
schedules (8 Bags):
New York Nonfrecway
(NYNF, Bags 1 and 5)
Los Angeles Nonfreeway
(LANF, Bags 2 and 6)
Los Angeles Freeway
(LAF, Bags 3 and 7)
New York Nonfreeway
(NYNF, Bags 4 and 8)
Durham Road Route
(DRR)
Length,
miles
5.55
0.53
1.15
** «*«*
0.53
6.37
Cumulative
distance
traveled,
miles
--
0.53
1.68
5.01
5.55
--
Average
speed,
mph
18.9
7.6
14.6
44.9
7.6
24.7
Cumulative
average
speed, nph
--
7.6
11.2
22.3
18.9
--
Maximum
speed,
mph
58
34
42
58
34
58
Time,
minutes
17.7
4.2
4.3
4.5
4.2
15.5
Cumulative
time,
minutes
--
4.2
9.0
13.5
17.7
--
Number of
stops per
cycle
15
6
2
1
6
10
Cumulative
stops
—
6
8
9
15
--
Time at
idle
%
32.9
52.0
28.4
2.2
52.0
11.8

-------
                        Table 5.  Test Schedule
  Day
            Schedule
                              Vehicle preparation and HDTC
2,3,4,5
  Cold start HDTC followed  by  a
  hot start HDTC followed by a
  hot start HDTC (replicate)
                              Vehicle preparation and DRR
7,8,9,10
( Cold start DRR  followed  by  a
{ hot start  DRR followed by a
( hot start  DRR (replicate)

-------
system used  9.5-in  diameter rolls, flywheels, and a DC electric motor  with  a
Reliance  digital  microprocessor  controller  for  inertia   simulation  <   1-lb
increments from 1,000  to 18,200 Ib and for simulation of  the  aerodynamic  and
frictional components  of road  load.   A Horiba Constant Volume  Sampling (CVS)
system with  selectable  flow rate  from 200  to  5000  cubic  feet  per  minute
   o
(ft /min) was used to dilute and sample exhaust for subsequent analysis.  This
system  was  operated  at   1400   ft /min   to   maintain  the   diluted   exhaust
temperatures below  125°F as required  for  particulate  sampling (9).  The  CVS
included  an  8-in  diameter dilution tunnel  with  approximately 25 ft from  the
point of  initial dilution air mixing  to  the particulate filtration  four-probe
system.   All  dynamometer  facilities,  including  the  dilution   tube,  CVS,
regulated exhaust emission analyzers,  and particulate emissions  analyzers,  met
Federal Register specifications.
     GASEOUS  AND   PARTICULATE   EMISSIONS   METHODS— Exhaust   characterization
included HC,  CO, NO,, fuel economy, total particulate mass, methylene chloride
                   A
     l,,)  %-extractables,  particulate  organics,  inert  material,  particulate
size less than  2p,  and lead, bromine, and chlorine analyses.   Inert  material
is  defined  as  the  insoluble material  remaining  on the  filter after  CH-Cl,,
extraction of the total particulate (i.e.,  the total particulate emission  rate
minus  the particulate  organic emission  rate).    With  diesel  trucks,  inert
material primarily consists  of elemental carbon; with gasoline  trucks  burning
leaded gasoline, it primarily consists of carbon,  lead,  bromine, and chlorine.
Either  hot  flame  ionization  (diesel  trucks) or standard  flame ionization
(gasoline  trucks)  detection  procedures  were used   for  HC,   nondispersive
infrared  procedures  for CO  and  carbon  dioxide  (COn).  and  chemi luminescence
procedures   for  NO  .    Total   particulate   mass   and   CHpCl9-extractable
particulate-phase  organic  mass  were  determined  using  previously described
                                       11

-------
filtration-gravimetric   and   solvent-extraction   procedures   (10),   and  the
particulate mass  less  than 2y  was  determined  using the cyclone size-selective
sampliiif;  proceJure  of  John  et;  al.   (11).   Individual  bag  and  composite
particulate emission  rates were measured with 47mm  filters.   Pallflex T60A20
Telfon-coated glass fiber filters were used for all particulate filtration and
extraction procedures  except for Fluoropore FA Teflon  membrane filters,  which
were used  for X-ray  fluorescence  analysis  of particulate lead,  bromine,  and
chlorine with the gasoline trucks  (12).   Due  to  analytical  equipment failure,
no X-ray  analyses  were performed  on  the diesel  truck filters.   A  summary of
the tost procedures for gaseous and particulate sample acquisition during HOTC
and DRR  operation  for the gasoline  and  diesel  trucks are listed in  Tables  6
and 7, respectively.
                                       12

-------
       Table 6.  Test Procedure for Gasoline Truck Gaseous and Particulate
               Sample Acquisition during HDTC and DRR Operation
Exhaust
Measurement
HC
CO
co2
'NOX
47mm Pallflex
(gravimetric)
47mm Pallflex
(size distri-
bution)
47mm Fluoropore
(X-ray analysis)
Cold start
(Bags 1,2,3,4)
integrated per bag
integrated per bag
integrated per bag
integrated per bag
one composite filter
per 4 bags
one composite filter
per 4 bags
one composite filter
per 4 bags
Hot start
(Bags 5,6,7,8)
integrated per bag
integrated per bag
integrated per bag
integrated per bag
one composite filter
per 4 bags
one composite filter
per 4 bags
one composite filter
per 4 bags
Hot start (Replicate)
(Bags 1,2,3,4)
integrated per bag
integrated per bag
integrated per bag
integrated per bag
one composite filter
per 4 bags
one composite filter
per 4 bags
one composite filter
per 4 bags
   Because the DRR  is a  one-bag  driving cycle,  integrated-per-bag  test  procedures were  used.
That is, gaseous emissions  (HC,  CO, CO.,, and NO  )  were analyzed from the single sample  bag
collected and single composite filters were collected for particulate analysis.

-------
        Table 7.  Test Procedure for Diesel  Truck Gaseous  and  Particulate
                      Sample Acquisition during HDTC and DRR Operation
  Exhaust
Measurement
Cold slart
(Bags 1,2,3,4)
Hot start
(Bags 5,6,7,8)
Hot start (Replicate)
(Bans 1,2,3,4)
     HC

     CO
47mm Pal If lex
(Gravimetric)

47mm Pall flex
(size distri-
 bution)

47mm Pal If lex
(extra gravi-
 metric)
continuous  per bag

integrated per bag

integrated per bag

integrated per bag

one integrated filter
filter per bag

one composite filter
per 4 bags
one composite filter
per 4 bags
continuous per bag

integrated per bag

integrated per bag

integrated per bag

one integrated filter
filter per bag

one composite filter
per 4 bags


one composite filter
per 4 bags
continuous per bag

integrated per bag

Integrated per bag

integrated per bag

one integrated filter
filter per bag

one composite filter
per 4 bags
one composite filter
per 4 bags
   Because the DRR is a  one-bag  driving  cycle,  integroted-per-bag test procedures were used.
That is, gaseous  emissions  (HC,  CO,  CO-, and NO ) were  analyzed  from  the  single sample bag
collected and single  composite filters were  collected  for particulate analysis.

-------
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION








     The main  objective of  this study was  to Pleasure  and characterize  the



gaseous and particulate emissions from heavy-duty gasoline- and diesel-powered



trucks using transient chassis dynamometer test procedures.  All  vehicles were



tested at approximately  70%  of their rated GVW over the HDTC  and  DRR  driving



cycles.  The  summary results  presented herein  are  divided according  to four



subsections:   (1)    weighted  gasoline  truck  emissions;  (2)  weighted  diesel



truck  emissions;  (3) individual bag/cycle results  from gasoline  trucks;  and



(4) individual bag/cycle results from diesel  trucks. The  underlying  data,  are



listed  in   Appendices  A,  B,   and  C.   Appendix  A  lists   the  integrated  and



weighted gaseous and particulate emission  rates by  individual  trucks over the



HDTC and DRR  driving cycles.   The  integrated  emissions  rates are those from



either the  cold  start or hot  start tests; the weighted emission  rates  are  a



composite  result,   based on   a  1/7  cold-start  and  6/7  hot-start  relative



weighting.   Appendix B  lists  by truck  the   individual  bag gaseous  emission



rates of the HDTC.   Appendix  C lists the  individual bag  particulate emission



rates  of  the  HDTC  for  the diesel  trucks; gasoline truck  particle  emissions



generally had insufficient mass for individual bag analysis.



     WEIGHTED GASOLINE  TRUCK  EMISSIO.NS—Summaries  of  the  individual  gaseous



and particulate emission rates are presented  in Table 8 for the HDTC  and Table



9 for  the DRR.   Graphical  representations of weighted gaseous  emissions (HC,



CO,  NO ,   and  fuel  economy)   and weighted   particulate  emissions   (total
       A


particulate, CH^CK  %-extractable,  particulate organics,  and  inert  material)



are depicted in Figures 2 and 3, respectively.



     HDTC HC and  CO emission  rates  were  greater  than  DRR  HC  and  CO emission



rates.  That is, HC  emission  rates  ranged from 4.11 to 33.99  g/mi during the




                                     15

-------
Table 8.  Heavy Duty Transient Cycle Weighted Emissions - Gasoline Trucks
Truck
ID
FUH413
F2H411
VOY285
VOY338
F3H633
G63333
Truck
Class
28
28
28
28
5
.6
HC
g/mi
12.86
22.54
4.29
4.11
33.99
31.93
CO
g/mi
80.30
69.52
82.70
44.09
370.75
220.52
NO
9/nif
6.66
10.90
3.67
4.99
5.91
9.44
Fuel
Economy
MPG
9.66
8.77
' 9.49
9.29
5.35
5.15
Total
Participate
g/mi
0.092
0.110
0.133
0.118
0.405
0.516
Particulate
Organics
g/mi
0.023
0.031
0.074
0.062
0.104
0.228
Inert
Material
g/mi
0.069
0.078
0.059
0.057
0.299
0.291
CH?C1?
Extract.
25.1
29.2
53.1
50.1
25.8
43.4
Size
Fraction
86.8
81.6
80.9
86.1
77.2
96.0

-------
Table 9.  Durham Road Route Weighted Emissions - Gasoline Trucks
Truck
ID
FUH413
F2H411
VOY285
VOY338
F3H633
G63333
Truck
Class
28
2?.
2B
28
5
6
HC
g/mi
7.14
9.60
1.90
1.87
19.56
16.99
CO
g/mi
45.10
47.81
42.66
23.77
344.48
198.99
NO
g/mi
8.75
12.41
4.30
5.25
6.17
10.66
Fuel
Economy
MPG
11.03
10.28
11.99
12.04
5.74
5.66
Total
Particulate
g/mi
0.091
0.101
0.119
0.088
0.340
0.460
Particulate
Organics
g/mi
0.026
0.028
0.064
0.043
0.096
0.180
Inert
Material
g/mi
0.066
0.072
0.055
0.045
0.241
0.293
CH?CI?
Extract.
0
A»
28.4
28.0
52.6
48.2
28.4
38.3
Size
Fraction
<2v,%
84.2
77.1
86.4
81.5
96.2
93.7

-------
                GASOLINE TRUCK EMISSIONS
GASOLINE TRUCK EMISSIONS
           CO
                                                                     ^
 ANN  .^  .^   ^
                                                                  ^    ^sr    ^   v^-   ^
                                                                                                      &
CO
                 GASOLINE TRUCK EMISSIONS
                            NOX
GASOLINE TRUCK  EMISSIONS
      FUEL  ECONOMY
                HEAVY DUTY TRANSIENT CYCLE
     DURHAM ROAD ROUTE
                               Figure 2.  Gasoline Truck Weighted Gaseous Emissions

-------
M
I
L 600-
L

I 500-
G
? 400-
M
S 300-

P 200-
E
R 100-
M
GASOLINE TRUCK EMISSIONS
TOTAL PARTICULATE


Si*


«K
fFTT3
S'H
ii/
u '
a.
?'~
JJ!
£. iip-1 pr. |'
P'-i'LJ teilLJ aiiiiii! pi-iJ hi
1
94*

•i
-

N






i!i;!3
tVl
it]
C
n
\. i
E:
1'
1


*••
-S^l
«•«

N

" ^
•^
;-?
^ •









                                                                           GASOLINE TRUCK  EMISSIONS
                                                                             CH2CI2 %-EXTRACTABLE
L
E
M
I
L
j
!'., •>'-;l.i-
R
A t
M
^
100-
p
E
R 00-

M
I 0
L
E
GASOLINE TRUCK EMISSIONS
PARTICULATE ORGANlfS
,?7
siili
liP
HJ :
II
ri:: .
••' iili :
Ifl 1:
PJfpL" " p!i : [.' i ii! ;
ll'lipl i-^rn !^;; |i
n " pl'KJi^L ji'liil '1 i'llilt \ i !;::'.;< '& :•
IfiO ilQ liiiibJ PP fcj III! ^ £i diP
r r r~ i \^
fi \ C* Q* 1* 1
^ VX ^ ^ ^^ 0&ri





-ri
.--
'* -
i'.''
L::3
'j
^'.j
^ 'f
:>'•$
!ii

)
















M
I
L
1
G
R
• A
M
-'
|>

R

M
j
!;•
                                                                           GASOLINE TRUCK EMISSIONS
                                                                                INERT MATERIAL
L ootj —
L
1 300 -
G
R 2'->0-
A
H r'oo-
U>0-
i>
f io;i-
R
'oO —
M
j u
[;•

SPi
K 't
PI' '
rl
P',
it
[v
" /- ' (i '
"'i'"'^'! IF "^^3 M 's >; I i'i
'i^F» H' : • 1 Oilii.'f^S iI!F!!l " r
||y Ijigj lly ijjfj tjl
riil
vv3 vx' i??;j -^ ^
?\>^ v-7^ ,10" ,iO- X-^XU


~*i


^
'*
•S
f
1

V

ft
illilii
Ci::i:
Hi::::
it
IP
hill::
Siiiii
pit

X



'- .
~A
i
i^
•:','
^j'1
i;^

l>












               HEAVY DOTY  TRANSIENT CYCLE                                    LJ DURHAM ROAD ROOTE
                                                                            ^w^
                              Figure 3.  Gasoline Truck Weighted  Participate Emissions

-------
HDTC, compared to 1.87 to 19.56 g/mi during the DRR; CO  emission  rates  ranged



from 44.09  to  370.75 g/mi during the  HDTC,  compared to 23.77 to  344.48  g/mi



during the DRR.  DRR  NO   emission  rates  and  fuel  economies were  greater  than
                       A


HDTC  NO   emission  rates  and  fuel  economies.  That is,  NO   emission  rates
       A                                                    A


ranged from 4.30 to 12.41 g/mi during the DRR, compared  to  3.67 to 10.90  g/mi



during the  HDTC.    Fuel  economy ranged from  5.66  to 12.04 mi/gal  during  the



DRR, compared to 5.15 to  9.66 mi/gal during  the HDTC.



     The class  5  Ford 600 (F3H633) was, by  far,  the greatest HDTC HC  and  CO



emitter,  with 33.99 and 370.75 g/mi  emission  rates,  respectively.   It  also was

                                                                3

the oldest vehicle,  a  1972  model,  had  a  relatively  small 330  in   V-8 engine,



and had  the highest  dynamometer  road-load  horsepower  setting (67.5  HP @  50



mph).  In order to maintain the prescribed  speed and acceleration  rates  of  the



driving cycle(s),  this  truck had to be  driven at  wide-open  throttle  o  good



deal of the  time.   This,  combined with the older pre-emission control  design



of its engine, accounts for its high emissions rate  and  low fuel economy.   The



class 6 GM  stake-bed (G63333) was  the next  greatest HC and  CO emitter, with



31.93 and 220.52  g/mi emission rates,  respectively.  It was  the  next  oldest



vehicle,  a 1975 model, and had the highest  rated GVW. Of the  class 2B trucks,



the 1978 Ford F350  (F2H411)  was  the highest  HC end  N0x  emitter,  at 22.54  and



10.90 g/mi, respectively, although  the 1982 Plymouth Voyager  (VOY285) was  the



highest CO  emitter  at  82.70  g/mi.   The newest  vehicle,  the  1983  Plymouth



Voyager (VOY3'J3), was the lowest emitter of the class 2B trucks.   Thus, there



appeared to be a positive correlation between  vehicle age  and emissions:   the



nev/er the vehicle, in both age and design,  the lower the  emissions.



     Particulate  emissions   (Tables  8  and  9, Figure  3)  followed a pattern



similar to  that found for  gaseous  emissions:  HDTC particle emissions were



greater than  DRR particle  emissions,  end  the  class 5   and 6 truck  emission





                                      20

-------
rates were  greater  than the  class  2B  truck  emission  rates  (as  expected,
because the class 5  and  6 trucks  burn  more  fuel  per unit  distance  than do the
class 2B trucks).  The CH-CI- %-extractable rates ranged  from a low  of 25% to
a  high   of  53;',;  there  was  no  real  difference  between  the  HDTC  and  CRR
%-extractable  rates.   The   %-extractables  varied  among  vehicles:    FUH413,
F2H411,  and  F3H633  (all  Ford 330  f.ID V-8  engines)  averaged 27.5  ±  1.6%
extractable;  VOY285  and VOY338 fall  Plymouth 360  CID V-8  engines)  averaged
51.0  ±  2.3% extractable;  G63333  (a  GM 350  CID  V-8) averaged  40.9 ±  3.6%
extractable.    Particulate  organic emissions  (the  product  of the  percentage
extractable with CH^Clp and the total  particulate emission rate) were greatest
from the class  b arid 6 trucks.  The inert material  emission  rates  displayed a
pattern similar to that of the %-extractable rates.
     An observation  concerning  particle  emissions from these trucks  was  that
the particle size fraction/percentage less  than 2y averaged 85.6 ±  6.7%.   This
percentage is  typical  of engines  emitting  excessive organic aerosol  that is
characterized by fine liquid droplets (13).   It should be  recognized, however,
that the  total  particulate  emission rate was .defined by  use L  a  laboratory
dilution  tunnel   and  that  very  large  particles  (greater  than  300y)  were
probably  lost  due  to gravitational settling  on  the walls of this tunnel  and
thus, were  not counted  in  the calculation  of total  particulate  matter.(14)
Figure 4  displays  both gasoline  and  diesel  fine particulate fractions  (less
than 2\i) for the HDTC and DRR driving cycles.
     Table 10 presents the leaded  particulate analyses for the gasoline truck'
over the  HDTC  and  DRR and include; lead, bromine,  chlorine,  and  total leaded
fraction  weight  percentage  data.   There was no  real difference  bewteen  the
HDTC  and  DRR   leaded   particulate   emission  percentages.    These   emission
fractions did  appear dependent on engine  type:   FUH413, F2H411, and F3H633
                                   21

-------
                GASOLINE  TRUCK EMISSIONS
               SIZE FRACTION LESS  THAN 2p
S  120-
I
z  100-
                  DIESEL  TRUCK EMISSIONS
                SIZE FRACTION LESS THAN 2p
F
R
A
C
T
I
0
N
80-

60-

40-

20-
           &

               feiibi
                    tt-
                          --mm
                           •^•1
                          t^ii..
                               i?
K:-
1^

111
ieil-' •
                                                Hr



       Figure 4.  Gasoline and Diesel Truck Size Fraction Less Than 2W

                          22

-------
              Table 10.   Gasoline  Trucks  Leaded  Participate Analysis
Vehicle
FUH413
F2H411
VOY285
VOY338
F3H633
G63333
Driving
Cycle
HDTC
DRR
HDTC
DRR
HDTC
DRR
HDTC
DRR
HDTC
DRR
HDTC
DRR
Pb, wt.%
31.2 ± 4.5
32.1 ± 2.3
28.8 ± 1.1
32.2 ± 1.8
12.3 ± 1.6
15.9 ± 2.7
18.4 ± 2.4
19.0 ± 1.9
28.3 ± 2.9
31.0 ± 2.4
19.7 ± 1.4
23.0 ± 2.6
Br, wt. %
16.7 ± 2.7
18.8 ± 1.5
14.7 ± 0.9
17.2 ± 1.1
7.8 ± 0.7
9.1 ± 1.7
10.1 : 1.3
10.9 ± 1.2
13.8 = 1.4
14.9 ± 0.7
9.7 ± 1.1
11.7 i 1.6
Cl, wt. %
5.3 ± 0.6
5.1 ± 0.3
4.7 i 0.4
4.7 i 0.2
1.6 ± 0.1
1.8 ± 0.4
2.5 ± 0.5
2.5 i 0.4
2.9 i 0.4
2.9 i 0.4
2.2 ± 0.3
2.8 ± 0.3
Total
Leaded
fraction3
53.2 ± 7.7
55.9 ± 3.9
48.3 ± 2.2
54.0 ± 3.1
24.5 ± 1.7
25.7 = 4.7
30.9 ~ 3.S
32.3 ± 3.4
44.8 ± 4.6
48.7 ± 2.3
31.5 ± 2.6
36.9 t 4.3
Total leaded fraction is the sum of Pb,  Br,  and  Cl weight  %'s.   It  represents
the fraction of the total  participate.   All  values listed  in  this  table  are
weighted averages.
                                      23

-------
(all Ford 330 CID V-8 engines) averaged ^50% total  leaded fraction;  VOY285 and
VOY338  (both  Plymouth  360  CID  V-8  engines)  averaged  ^28%  total   leaded
fraction; and G63333  (a  GM  350 CID  V-8) averaged %34% total  leaded  fraction.
Lead  is  emitted primarily  as  the compound  PbBrCl  from  engine exhaust  (15).
The Pb content  of  this compound is 64.2% by mass  and its emission is due  to
the  presence of  ethylene  dichloride  and  ethylene  dibromide  scavengers  in
normal leaded fuel.  PbBrCl  has theoretical  mass ratios  for lead,  bromine, and
chlorine of  0.64,  0.25, and  0.11,  respectively.  The particle  compositional
data  in  Table  10  indicate  that  mass  ratios  for lead,  bromine,  and  chlorine
were approximately 0.50, 0.32, and 0.09,  respectively, closely  reflecting the
theoretical  mass rations.  Data from the  previous EPA truck  study reported  by
Black £t aj_. that  involved  six 1973 to 1983  vehicles, indicated  similar  mass
ratios for  lead,  bronine,  and chlorine:  0.59, 0.33, and 0.08,  respectively
(1).
     Figure  5 puts into perspective the  relative  contributions of the  three
particulate components (leaded fraction, particulate organic  fraction,  and the
remaining inert material fraction) to  the total  particulate emission  rates for
each  vehicle.   The remaining  inert material  fraction consists of  non-CK2Cl?
extractable  carbonaceous material  and various  trace  elements  (e.g.,  sulfur,
phosphorous,  clacium,  zinc,   ion,  sodium,  aluminum,  chrominum, manganese,
nickel, copper,  etc.).  The  three Ford engine-equipped trucks (FUH413,  F2H411,
and F3H633)  had the  highest  leaded  particulate fraction  of 50%, the  lowest
particulate organic fraction  of  28?,  and a   remaining inert  material  fraction
of  22%.   The two  Plymouth  engine-equipped  vans (VC"285  and VOY338) had  the
lowest leaded  particulate  fraction of  28%,  the hu-'-iest  particulate  organic
fraction  of 51%,  and  a  remaining  inert   material  fraction  of  212.    The
                                     24

-------
ro
              0 15
                     CLASS 26  TRUCKS - HDTC DRIVING CYCLE
             0 15
                     CLASS 2B TRUCKS - DRR DRIVING CYCLE
                                                                      0  6
CLASS 5/6 TRUCKS - HDTC DRIVING  CYCLE
                                                                     0 6
CLASS 5/6 TRUCKS -  DPR  DRIVING CYCLE
                                               iJJlJiJ PARTICIPATE OPGANICS
          |    | REMAINING IWRT CRACTIPN
                                   Firjure  5.  Gasoline  Truck  Participate Composition

-------
remaining GM engine-equipped truck (G63333) had  a  leaded  participate fraction



of 34?., a participate  organic  fraction  of  41%,  and a  remaining inert material



fraction of 25%.



     WEIGHTED DIESEL TRUCK  EMISSIONS—Summaries  of the  individual  gaseous and



particulate emission rates are presented in Table 11 for the HDTC and Table 12



for the DRR.  Graphical representations  of weighted gaseous emissions (HC, CO,



NO - and fuel economy)  and  weighted  particulate  emissions  (total  particulate,



CHpClp 2-extractable,  particulate  organics,  and inert material)  are depicted



in Figures 6 and 7, respectively.



     The HDTC HC, CO, and NOY emission rates were greater than the DRR HC, CO,
                            A


and NO  rates;  DRR  fuel economies  were  greater than HDTC  fuel  economies.   HC



emission rates ranged from 0.45 to 6.24  g/mi  during the  HDTC, compared to 0.28



to 4.69 g/mi during  the DRR;  CO emission rates ranged from  1.88  to  9.70 g/mi



during the  HDTC,  compared to  1.17 to 7.C9 g/mi  during  the  DRR;  NO   omission
                                                                   A


rates ranged  from 3.30  to  13.36 g/mi  during  the HDTC,  compared to 2.70  to



11.41 g/mi during the DRR.  DRR fuel  economy ranged from 9.66 to 16.90 mi/gal,



compared to 8.83 to 15.80 mi/gal during  the HDTC.



     The class 6 Ford 7000 (FDB420),  possessing the only direct-injection-type



heavy-duty diesel engine in the truck fleet, was the greatest  HDTC HC and NO
                                                                             X


emitter with  6.24 end  13.36 g/mi  emission rates, respectively.  The class  6



Chevrolet stake-bed  (CDW786B)   was  the   greatest  HDTC  CO  emitter,  wit!  9.87



g/mi.  The  four similar class  6  diesel  trucks (CDU786A,  CDW7SO, FDWIGi .  and



CDW786B), all equipped with Detroit  Diesel  500 CID V-8  engines, had  fairly



similar HDTC emissions  patterns:  HC emissions ranged from.2.24 to 4.18 g/mi,



CO emissions ranged from 5.64  to 9.87 g/mi, NO   emissions  ranged  from 8.86 to
                                              A


10.87 g/mi,'and fuel economy ranged from 8.83 to 10.89 mi/gal.   The newest and



lov/est mileage class 6 vehicle, the 1984 Ford F600 stake-bed (FDW161), was the





                                      26

-------
Table 11.  Heavy Duty Transient Cycle Weighted Emissions - Diesel Trucks
Truck
ID
FDW112
CDR734
FDP387
FDB420
CDW786A
CDW780
FDU161
CDW786B
Truck
Class
2B
2B
2B
6
6
6
6
6
HC
g/mi
4.11
0.45
.0.47
6.24
4.18
2.90
2.24
3.96
CO
g/mi
7.54
1.88
2.24
8.10
9.70
5.69
5.64
9.87
NO
g/nn
3.30
4.15
6.46
13.36
9.30
8.86
10.87
9.46
Fuel
Economy
MPG
12.65
15.80
14.00
10.16
8.83
9.72
10.89
9.48
To till
Pjrticulate
y/iiii
1.202
0.422
0.545
2.218
1.708
1.404
0.762
1.916
Particulate
Organics
g/mi
1.029
0.189
0.378
1.702
0.823
0.646
0.360
0.923
Inert
Material
g/mi
0.173
0.286
0.168
0.516
0.883
0.760
0.401
0.993
CH?C1-
Extract.
iy
85.2
39.4
69.8
78.8
50.3
45.8
46.0
47.6
Size
Fraction
<2u,%
101.4
68.4
79.9
86.2
103.6
73.4
76.5
65.6

-------
                                    Table 12.   Durham Road Route Weighted Emissions - Dieso! Trucks
Truck
10
FDW112
CDR734
FDP387
FDB420
CDW786A
CDW780
FDW161
CDW786B
Truck
Class
2B
2B
2B
6
6
6
6
6
HC
g/mi
2.70
0.28
0.42
4.69
2.84
1.91
1.21
1.99
CO
g/mi
4.37
1.17
1.60
6.57
7.09
5.47
4.36
6.94
HO
g/nn
2.70
4.25
4.48
11.41
7.32
9.25
9.71
8.72
Fuel
Economy
MPG
15.27
16.90
16.12
10.49
10.67
9.81
11.06
9.66
Total
Paniculate
g/mi
0.887
0.287
0.495
1.941
1.497
1.184
0.666
1.547
Particulate
Organics
g/mi
0.809
0.129
0.342
1.647
0.510
0.390
0.251
0.456
Inert
Material
g/mi
0.078
0.158
0.154
0.294
n.994
0.785
0.415
1.091
CH?C1?
Extract.
91.1
45.3
69.5
84.9
34.1
29.1
36.8
30.0
Size
Fraction
<2u,£
100.0
75.0
76.8
90.1
B/.5
73.0
73.4
63.0
ro
CO

-------
                 DIESEL TRUCK EMISSIONS
                            HC
      DIESEL TRUCK EMISSIONS
                CO
ro
vo
                  DIESEL TRUCK EMISSIONS
                            NOX
      DIESEL TRUCK EMISSIONS
           FUEL ECONOMY
                                                                     &
               HEAVY DUTY TRANSIENT CYCLE
          DURHAM ROAD ROUTE
                                            Figure 6.  Diesel Truck Weighted Gaseous Emissions

-------
  M
  I
  L
  L
  1
  G
  K
  A
  p
  f
  M
  I
DIESEL TRUCK t.'HJGSJONS
   TOTAL  PARTICULAR"
                                                                             DIESEL  TRUCK EMISSIONS
                                                                                      X.-EXTRACTABLE
to
o
M
I
L
L
I
G
R
A
M
S

P
E
R
DIESEL TRUCK EMISSIONS
 PARTICULATE ORGANICS
                                                             M
                                                             I
                                                             L
                                                             L
                                                             I
                                                             C
                                                             R
                                                             A
                                                             M
                                                             S
                                            ,200
                                                             M
                                                             I
                                                             L
                                                             t'
                                                           DIESEL TRUCK EMISSIONS
                                                               INERT MATERIAL
                ill HEAVY DUTY  TRANSIENT CYCLE                                   Ed DURHAM ROAD ROUTE
                fuio                                                             ^^^B

                                  Figure  7.   Diesel  Truck  Weighted  Participate  Emissions

-------
lowest overall emitter of  the  class  6 trucks.   Thus, there again  appeared  to
be a  positive correlation between vehicle  age  and emissions:  the  newer  the
vehicle,  the  lower  the  emissions.    Of  the   class  2B  diesel  trucks,  the
malfunctioning (i.e., oil  burning) Ford  van FDW112 was .the highest  HC  and  CO
emitter, at  4.11  and 7.54 g/mi,  respectively.   The  two 1984 class  2B  pickup
trucks  (CDR734 and  FDP387)  were the  lowest vgaseous emitters  of the  entire
truck  fleet,  with  HC,   CO,  and  NO    averaging  0.46,  2.06,  and  5.31  g/mi,
                                   X
respectively, over the HDTC.
     Particulate emissions (Tables 11  and 12,  Figure 7) followed  the  pattern
found  for  gaseous  emissions:  HDTC  particle emissions  were greater than  DRR
particle  emissions,  and  the  class  6  truck  emission  rates  were,  with  one
exception, greater than the  class 2B truck  emission  rates.  The exception  was
FDW112.   It  had  a HDTC  total  particulate emission  rate  of 1.202 g/mi,  more
than  twice  the particle  emission rates of the other  class  23 trucks:   CDR734
had a  0.422 g/mi  emission rate,  and FDP387 had  a  0.545  g/oi  emission  rate.
FDW112 also had the highest HDTC and  DRR combined CH2C12 %-extractable  rate of
88.2%.  The  four siniilar-engined  class 6  trucks,  CD!.'786A,  CDU780,  FDU161,  and
CDV/786B,  averaged  47.4  ±  2.1  %-extractable during the HDTC  and  32.8  ±  3.4%
during  the   DRR.    It   is  not  known  why  the  HDTC  %-extractables   were
significantly  greater   than   the   DRR   %-extractables,   unless   it    is   a
characteristic peculiar  to  this Detroit  Diesel  engine  family and/or  these
driving cycle(s).  With the  other four diesel trucks, FDW112, CDR734,  FDP387,
and FDB420,  there was no  significant difference  between their respective HDTC
and DRR %-extractable rates.   The HDTC and DRR  combined %-extractable rate for
FDW112 was  88.2%,  for CDR734 was 42.2?,  for FDP387 was 69.7%,  and for  FDB420
was 81.9%.   As expected,  the  particulate organic emissions  results parallel
the  %-extractable  results:    different   engines  emit  differing   amounts  of
                                       31

-------
participate organics, with newer engines and vehicles  (e.g.,  FDU161)  emitting
less material than older engines and vehicles.
     The  inert  diesel  material primarily  consists  of non-CHpClp  extractable
elemental carbon.   Inert  material  emissions  from class 6 trucks were  greater
than those from the class 2R trucks, and, other than that,  there were  no other
identifiable emissions patterns with respect  to inert material  emissions.   The
particle  size  fraction  less  than  2\i  averaged 8G.9  ± 12.7%  for  all  diesel
trucks over both  the  HDTC and  DRR.  This size fraction <2\i ranged from a  low
of -^54% with CDW786B to a high of  ^96% with CDW786A.   CDW786A/B, it should be
noted, is the same  1981  Chevrolet  stake-bed that was  tested twice  in  the test
program.  CDW786A experienced  no  driving  or  mechanical  problems  during  its
initial  testing.   However,  during its  retest  two  months   later,   CDW786B
experienced  both coolant  use   and lack-of-power  problems  (that  were  later
diagnosed as the  result of a leaky head  gasket).   The emissions patterns from
both CDW786A and CDU786B were remarkably  similar,  except  for the particle size
fraction  <2u.   The reason  for this is  not  known;  perhaps  the coolant  leak
helped  cause  the agglomeration  of carbon particles  greater   than 2y  in  the
exhaust.
     INDIVIDUAL   BAG/CYCLE   RESULTS  FROM   GASOLINE   TRUCKS—The  individual
bag/cycle  HDTC  gaseous   emissions  results  from  all  trucks  are  listed  in
Appendix  B.   Two vehicles,  a  class 2B  Plymouth  Voyager van,  VOY285, and  a
class 5  Ford 600 van,  F3H633,  will be used in this  section as representative
examples of the  gasoline  truck fleet.  HDTC  emissions from VOY285 and F3H633
are depicted in Figures 8 and 9, respectively.   In  these  figures, Bag  1 is  the
tm.'F cycle (see Table 4), Bag 2 is the  LANF cycle,  Bag 3  is  the LAF cycle,  and
Bag 4 is  the NYNF cycle.  Cold-start portions  of the  HDTC are  depicted by  the
solid  bars;  hot-start  portions,   by  the  crosshatched  bars.  The   overall
                                     32

-------
                   VOY285 HC EMISSIONS
VOY285 CO EMISSIONS
  R
  A
  M
  P
  f
  R

  M
  I
  L
  L"
CO
CO
                  VOY285 NOX EMISSIONS
G
P 200-
A i -,r
M '
S 150-

p 125-
E 100-
p
75-
M 50-
E a













» i
IP
r';
..:
^
;;*
••**
3
1
1
i'-:
t*
1
1m







»9
rr
t!
!
i|:
I







i
;i
P
1







i
if
fe :









'.S
1
'
| in
1






i
i
i^i
i
^






T










l«f
ill
S'Siijj
11
1


















<
'?
i












VOY285 FUEL  ECONOMY
                    y| COLD START                                                H HOT START

                  Figure 8.  VOY285 -  Class 2B Gasoline - HDTC Individual Bag Gaseous Emission Rates

-------
 F3H633  HC  EMISSIONS
F3H633 CO EMISSIONS
G otu
R 70_
A
M 60-
S 50-
P 40_
E
R 30-

M 20-
1 10-














nn

-i
j
i

•>


V
A







•4 J
n\
g

i!
i
•a
n
. .in






•ffn

a ^
t
f ;
H
f
y







11 •
1 1

H
i
L!
'i
I
. 1
i'i











III
1




S* 9
pun
.:
;/
•- "I
* 1
t" "5

t? "





Ml f
ii
!-i i
••Ilil
:; ! i
.; iti

iiili
ill
ill




















•>!


iiti







•? i
•i


\
j
: i











j







34 •
n

*
•1
itfi













F3H633 NOX EMISSIONS
F3H633 FUEL ECONOMY

                                                                                     -
       COLO START
      HOT START
Figure 9.   F3H633  - Class 5 Gasoline -  HOTC  Individual  Bag  Gaseous Emission Rates
                                                                                                       :  k

-------
weighted  result  is  weighted  1/7  cold  start  and  6/7  hot start.   Emissions



sensitivity to individual  bag/cycle  and either cold start or  hot  start  shall



be discussed.



     With regard to  individual bag HC and  CO  emissions, there  was  significant



variation  among  the four  individual   bag  results,  with  the  emission  rate



reaching  its  maximum during  Bag  1  operation and  its minimum  during Bag  3



operation.  Generally,  for HC  and  CO  for both  cold-and  hot-start  result?,



Bag 1 > Bag 4  >  Bag 2 > Bag 3.  Bag 1  is  the  New  York Monfreev/ay  stcp-and-go



driving schedule with a low average  speed  of  7.6 mph, while Bag 3  is  the  Los



Angeles  Freeway  nonstop   driving  schedule  with  a  high  average  speed   of



44.9 mph.    HC  and  CO emissions and fuel  consumption (the  inverse  of  fuel



economy) are directly related  to the rigorousness of  the  driving  cycle:   the



more rigorous  (i.e.,  more  stop-and-go-type driving with lower  average  speeds)



the driving cycle,  the  greater the emissions  and  fuel  consumption  (1).  This



relationship,   driving  cycle  rigorousness  versus  emission   rate  and   fuel



consumption, was certainly followed by the vehicles in this study.   Concerning



individual  bag  NO   emissions,  there   was  little  variation   among  the four
                  A


individual bag  results,  although Bag 3 emission rates were slightly  greater



than either Beg 1,  2, or 4 emission rates.   With  regard to  individual  bag fuel



economy, there was  moderate  variation  among the four  individual bag  results,



with fuel  economy reaching its maximum  during  Bag  3  operation  and  its  minimum



during either Bag 1  or  Bag 4  operation.  Generally,  for fuel  economy,  Bag  ..  >



Bag 2 > Bag 4 >,  Bag 1.



     Concerning cold-start versus  hot-start emissions  sensitivity,  cold-start



HC  and  CO  emissions were significantly  greater  than  hot-start  HC  aid  CO



emissions; cold-start and hot-start NO  emissions were approximately  equal;
                                        X


cold-start fuel  economies  were slightly  less  than hot-start  fuel  economies.





                                       35

-------
It rhculd be recognized that the cold-start portion of the HDTC has  only  a  1/7
weighting,  so  its  contribution  to the  overall  weighted emission  rate  is
relatively  small,  as  indicated in  Figures 8 and  9.   The hot-start  portion,
wivh  its  6/7 weighting, is,  therefore,  the major contributor to the  overall
weighted rate.
      INDIVIDUAL BAG/CYCLE RESULTS FROM  DIESEL TRUCKS—The individual  bag/cycle
HDTC gaseous and particulate emissions results are listed  in Appendices  B  and
C.  Two  vehicles,  a  class  2B Ford  pickup, FDP387,  and  a class 6  Chevrolet
stake-oed, CDW780, will be used in  this  section  as  representative examples  of
the diesel  truck fleet.  HDTC  gaseous emissions  from  FDP387  and CDU780  are
depicted in Figures 9 and 10, respectively, and  HDTC particulate  emissions  are
depicted in Figures 11  and  12,  respectively.  Cold-start  portions of the HDTC
are depicted by the solid bars and hot-start portions  by the  crosshatched bars
for  these  four  figures.   Gaseous  and particulate emissions  sensitivity  to
individual b^g/cycle and either cold-start or hot-start shall  be  discussed.
     Kith  regard to  individual   bag  HC,  CO, ?nd  NC>x  emissions,  there  was
moderate variation  among  the four  individual bag  results, with the  emission
rate  reaching  its  maximum  during Bag  1  or Bag 4  operation  and its  minimum
during 3ag 3 operation.  Generally, for HC, CO,  and NO , Bag  1  ^  Bag  4  >  Bag 2
>  Bag 3.   With  regard to  individual  bag  fuel  economy,  there  was  moderate
variation among  the  four individual bag  results,  with fuel  economy  reaching
its maximum  during Bag  2  or  Bag 3 operation  and its  minimum  during  Bag  1
operation.  Generally  for  fuel  economy,  Bag 2 >  Bag  3  >  Bag  4   >  Bag  1.
Concerning  cold-start  versus hot-start  emissions  sensitivity, cold-start  HC
and CO  emissions were  somewhat  greater  than hot-start  HC and CO  emissions;
cold-start and  hot-start  NO. emissions were approximately equal;   cold-start
                            A
fuel economies were slightly less than  hot-start fuel  economies.

                                    36

-------
      FDP387 HC EMISSIONS
FDP387 CO EMISSIONS
G ' "
k
A 0.8-
M
o
0 6-

t: .
p y . '\ ~

]

^
E c,! !


















..,.
tr ;
• ,*
• .1
",j


ft* '


Li^









I
; !
'i I
•1 1
i :









|
j

1]
[j







• 11
;|
4;

mfT
pf
*("









t-.
, ,4
^;!
,'-" -i '

£2








44













t) ;
- i1*
r" /'

i'-. ,J
















r ' ' w ~1
u
K' 3 ti-
A
M 3.0-
3 2.5-

I1 2.0-
E
R 1 .5-
M l-«-
k " 5-

c 0 . 0— '














1 1
r^j
1 ' *i
.*•;
*'i
; •;
i''V

|r:
y



















7 6
f*5;

N
H |
[ • : ;
-' "J
jkl
T^t
\











\








m
-• - r
, ; i

'f'V,
l-tj^ ;









1

I
i[





JUJ!
"
:?;.]
t:>
'>•'•
H
?•/._:
^j^ j


















t i
' • ^
:,;.;
• ."

^
r j -:
^^i






r





1






iff
™
L^
"ri
'-- *-*
:•>
ES














     FDP38/ NOX  L'MI33ION
EDP387  FUEL  ECONOMY
1 ' —
R ,,,_
A
M 12-
0 iy-
'' 3-
P. 6-

M ''"
1 2-
0 — '















t
V


F*Tf—



•

1 '
nil


G







ff •
Ti
i'
! I
,'
1 1
1,'j

\














O.V1
ty







4 t
r1


f
G







( j

III
iii
I

i










F-i'sr
i

r
KG
V

Qcr






IIJM
1
ill

b



)LC










K
v>

> ST




; 9

; ' t



G

?
AR




1 4
in;
Hi
i I
II
!{
ll
ill

\



T










Ob







T^^
I
••i
';'-'.


•\v







1 1
jii
1!
I
,uu

;


^











(' V

^





f S


-•' '1















;




I ^u
L 18-
t 16-
'' H-
P 12-
' 3-
f , r~, -
A 4 __
L
L c-~
Of .
ij
u





















i
,1
j- ' "

i*' ' '
ii

\
G






s
in
i !
h





?\f
V



B1f
•- '
V

I

^3
/ii
";
- ]

4
. «
T "*
•
if

fi,
G


f H

8.4
1
:i
, [r
I U
|I|
1 [
1 I
ill
'i!
'1
III





OT










r


CT



**" 1
' i'l
^
'

:J'i

,«,
()

•A1
f
ART



i
1|
.'
i
I,

j
ll


• \~
.•<,'





•WT
^ ;
E
[ '
t J
b


V-'





liii
I
'il
illl
1 1
III
|,j:
if
j|
ii










i

i
!
i



s




t* II

^
\ ?
?~','
ll"'















-,




Figure  10.  FDP387 - Class 28 Diesel  - HDTC Individual  Bag  Gabeous Emission  Rates

-------
   G  8-
                   CDW780  HC EMISSIONS
CDW780 CO EMISSIONS
00
                    CDW780 NOX EMISSION:
G |r3'
R H._
A
M 12-
S '
I0~

r 8"
E

R 6-
M 4"
I 2-
L
En,
y-j



)•









	
*>°


t
M
m
:i!
iii
j!|
•' !
i :
II
it
i

\













^







• 7
H
M
• I
II
11
i ;

. z
0







J


1 1 99
i if
1 ^
i
i * -,^
!i i

^










t •
i!
|
•ii

3




J^


1

*
IK
! 1
!
i

A
^°
«J



1 1
P
it .,
i!i in
i .5
1 (...
i 1 .-'
1 to
1 ! S
! f<
t ID
g
i

X






1 1 > i
1 E

K:
i


X"
^V













0
CDW780 FUEL ECONOMY
                                                                    ^0    ^v
                          COLD START
                                                                                     HOT  START
                   Figure 11.  CDW780 - Class 6 Diesel  - HDTC  Individual Bag Gaseous Emission Rates

-------
M
* 1.600-]
I
I

R
A 1.000-
M
;•- 8UU -
,1 M M
R lby
M

FDP387 TOTAL PARTICULATE EMISSIONS








'4 1
^
i*
%
I
ft I
Pi
&r" !

L . S



'W
1 •
l"j
p - • '
1 feiia
. ?
E >!^ &>




Kt



B
n
' .-
^
f
r ft
i ! .,. m 3 r
|j B^3mjn *»• i

1 r i j •':; 1
11 ! K i ^ i
b »• .cO
?•
II




14J
R|
1
^
id
^




P
c 9«-
L' 80-
N 70-
60-
t" G0-
x /10_
R 30-
A 20_
C tu
J 1 Id ~
A ri
3 B
FDP387 CH?C
2 Ji-EXTRACTABLE


70 r
H 1




i
>" r9 ' < 0
x ^y , v'O' f ' , c v c >
^ *A\ NP L . \ \ V \A^
CO
vo
            FDP387 PARTICULATE  ORGANIC EMISSIONS
M
I
L
L
I
G
R
A
M
S

P
E
R

M
I
L
E
FDP387 INERT MATERIAL
                                                               800
                           COLD START
                                      PI - „,. in

-------
M
* 3,000-
L
I 2,500-
b
R 2,000-
A
M
S 1,500-

P 1,000-
t"
R
500-
M
I 0— 1
CDW780 TOTAL PARTICULATE EMISSIONS
jjr-^












: <3
;. •
: 'I
'C
' i
v;;
- 1 .'
\ i
; •* j
f°J i
,r .

*il
i



1011


nra
!
j
!!
"1
1
M 	 1
***!


i/n
r^






>
1. ~
•• "i
r' :
: 4

f,-,ti.

14*
i!'
|l
II

lijj.
::!{
!li!






'• '' t
•' ti
\ \


'• • v
i-- :i
i*-. i




M
1


i
i
ul
?7
n-3)
• ' 'I
1 •' ~i
'•'i

)-rr
y







                    1      1
                         &
P
L 1 00 -
R
C 90~
E 80-
N 70_
T
60-
E 50-
• Y
/ir» _
•,- lio —
R 30-
4
A 20_
j 10-
A 0-^
CDW/80 CM?CI












_J
S4 |
fe_
'< : '•
'.

fc5
P
—
4«
:ji

i
I
J:
n
ii
j
B r N
L ^
2 X-EXTRACTABLE






3




1
3 	 1
;• ?
P^*1
fi. ••( "
h-;

^''
F-I
II
^' "J !
r ,J t
wi
bii
/ •.— "
yiii
X

& t
!!
44 E




=5nln:Sr
its
11

fc

J
Iv"
! ."',
&

Ml n t <. .
II
t
i!
i!
ii;
! !




r^R
^ j
t-"'-i
t* >'
Cvv


i-
•i!ji
ii1:
i
'b »>
^° ^ ^




T?

K-



X
a 4


iiii
1
:;«
;id
:i'it
tit
iilii
)
.<






4t •
BT-1
s:'
ttV
• J
Ij. '
5
,a-^
-*""*.!
tE^J
X






)
            CDW780 PARTICULATE ORGANIC  EMISSIONS
 L
 L
 I
 G
 R
 A
 M
 S

 P
 E
 R

M
I
L
F
, (300 -
, 400-
,200-
,000-
600-

600-

400-

200-
0 —















^"
^:-
r -
L •';;

f

'-'-

•' t.
,H





ft
"ill


1
t
!|
iii






j

|

1

i


IT.'
;'
'' ,.
|v«





••]
ti!





;u
— rr
I
j]
: ,
i
iii
i
ii!






















FT
^ '

I '.
I£M









7?

I
1
;|
!|









E


II







*•»
•*"W













Cl
|
f!
!!
j!
ii

















M*
*r
[-;
f'

•.'-." 1
i?. !










*•
»
j

|
i

JL\J





f*
', .' ;
i^'j
^
•?
"5

}1\J












M
^ 1 , 400 -
1 ^f'sfA
j 1 , 200-
G
R 1,000-
A
M 800-
600-
P
E 400-
R
200-
M
I 0J
i
CDW/80 INERT MATERIAL
i?w:










•_ : P

."i.
'.j
:1*'
'i ^
;,
f -.- '
; '., '
•A :
(.'•* i
?;? !
'-" ii
,•>•' ii
yii







?
1
1

i
ul
|.-J j
V ' '
•-. ; ii
A\\


a
!*

1
tl*
?*"
^
f.';
fi-i
fikJ

M7
T
j

iii










i
!•»
i •
• '-; r

: >i 1
iW •
S!
^
k; J '
6 i
r-; •
111
^

IXI
/f
T


i
i
!
1
i
i;s
' :
"~J
f 'i ;
i
•"•' ii
'M
f|i
1
?l!
&i




I
i -


P*4
1**''
• 'i
&
K'
2.A






                        J COLD START
                                                                                     HOT START

-------
     With  regard to  individual  bag  total  particulate  emissions,  there  was
moderate variation among the four individual bag results, with the particulate
emission rate  reaching its maximum during  Bag 1 or  Bag 4 operation  and  its
minimum during  Bag  2 operation.   Generally, total  particulate  emissions  were
directly related to fuel  consumption, with  Bag 1 >  Bag 4 > Bag  3 >  Bag  J.
Cold-start  total   particulate  emissions   were  significantly   greater  than
hot-start  particulate  emissions.   Concerning  individual  bag  S-extractable
results,  there  was moderate variation among the  four individual  bag  results,
with  the  %-extractable  rate  reaching  its  maximum  during  Bag  2  or  Bag  3
operation   and   its  minimum  during  Bag  4  operation.   Generally,   for
"-extractables,  Bag 2 ^  Bag 3 >  Bag J  >  Bag 4.   Cold-start  and  hot-start
S-extractable rates  were  aporoximately equal.   Particulate organic  emissions
displayed no consistent emissions pattern,  there  was  moderate variation among
the individual  bags,  with particulate organics reaching  their  maximum during
Bag 3  operation (class 28 trucks only)  and during Bag  2 or  Bag 1  operation
(class 6 trucks only).   Cold-start particulate organic emissions were  usually
greater  than   hot-start  particulate  organics.    Inert  material   emissions
displayed a  more consistent emissions pattern; there was moderate  variation
among  the   individual  bags,  with  inert material  emissions  reaching  their
maximum during  Bag  1 or Bag  4  operation  and  their minimum during  Bag 2 or Bag
3 operations.   Generally, for inert material emissions, Bag 4 > Bag 1  > Bag 3
> Bag 2.
                                  41

-------
SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS

     The  main objective  of  this  study  was  to  determine  the  gaseous  and
particulate emission rates from heavy-duty gasoline- and diesel-powered trucks
using transient  chassis  dynamometer test  procedures.  Both the  gasoline-  and
diesel-powered trucks  are used in  similar  types of general delivery  service
and v:ere  tested  over the  same  driving cycles,  the  HDTC  and  DRR,  at  s-:,nilar
chassis dynamometer road-load horsepower settings.   How, then,  do the emission
rates compare by truck type (i.e., gasoline versus  diesel)? Table 13 provides
a comparison  of  gasoline and diesel  truck  HDTC emission  rates,  listing  both
the range  of emission  rates  and the  average (the  mean  with  its  associated
standard  deviation)  emission rate  in the  various  emittant categories.   The
gasoline  trucks   are   classified  by  two   truck  categories,  class  2B  (four
vehicles) and class 5 or 6 (two vehicles); the diesel trucks are  classified by
class 2B  (three  vehicles)  and  class 6 (five  vehicles)  truck categories.   The
spread of emission  rates  listed in Table  13  represents the range  of emission
rates  in  each  truck  class  (i.e.,  minimum-to-maximum  emission  rate).   From
observation of the data in Table 13, it can be concluded:

     1.  All class 2B  truck  emission  rates  were  less than class 5  or  6  truck
     emission rates.   Class  2B  fuel economies were greater than class 5  or 6
     fuel  economies.

     2.  HC ar.c.  CO emission  rates were significantly higher from the gasoline
     trucks.  Gasoline  truck  HC emissions ranged from  4  to  13  times  greater
     than diesel  truck HC emissions  and  gasoline  truck  CO emissions  ranged
     from 10 to 40 times greater than diesel  truck  CO emissions.
                                      42

-------
Table 13.   Companion of  Gasoline ind Diesel Truck HOTC Emission Hit"

EnHttant
.<> . g/ml
WPG, miles/gal Ion
Total Participate, g/ml
CH?Clj :-E»tractitl!e (I)
Piirt iculate Organlcs, gVmi
Inert Material, g/ml


Si/e fraction >2u, (:)
Class
Range
4.11 - 22.54
44.09 - 82.70
3.67 - 10.90
8.77 . 9.66
0.092 - 0.133
25.1 - 53.1
0.923 - 0.074
0.057 - 0.078


80.9 - 66.8
B Gasoline
Average
10.95 J 8.74
69. IS : 17.66
6.56 ; 3.14
9.30 • 0.39
0.113 : 0.017
39.4 ; 14.3
0.048 : 0.024
0.066 : 0.010


83.9 ! 3.0
Class
Range
31.93 - 33.99
220.52 - 370.75
5.91 - 9.44
5.15 - 5.35
0.405 - 0.516
25.8 - 43.4
0.104 . 0.278
0.291 - 0.299


77.2 - 96.0
5 or 6 Gasol lie
Average
32.96 ; 1.46
295.64 ; 106.23
7.68 • 2.50
5.25 t 0.14
0.461 : 0.078
34.6 : 12.4
0.166 ! 0.088
0.295 ; 0.006


86.6 •- 13.3
»ci«s
	 Ra...|r "• •
0.47 - 4.11
1.88 - 7.V.
3.30 - 6.46
12.65 - 15.80
0.4?2 - 1.202
39.4 - 85.2
0.1R9 - 1.029
0.168 - 0.286
...

68.4 - 101.4
?B 01«M
Average
1.68 2 2.11
3.89 : 3.17
4.64 • 1.64
14.15 ; 1.58
0.723 : 0.419
64.8 ; 23.3
0.532 : 0.441
0.209 : 0.067
...

83.2 ; 16.8
Class (
Range
2.24 - 6.24
5.64 - 9.87
8.86 - 13.36
8.83 - 10.89
0.762 - 2.218
4S.8 - 78.8
0.360 - 1.702
0.401 - 0.993
...

65.6 - 103.6
Diesel
Average
3.90 ; 1.53
7.80 ; 2.07
10.37 • 1.83
9.82 -• 0.77
1.602 • 0.555
53.7 • 14.1
0.891 • 0.501
0.711 ; 0.248
...

81.1 • 14.6

-------
                  X
     3.  NO  emission  rates were  sMghtly  higher (0 to 50%) from the class  6
     diesel trucks compared to the class 5  or 6 gasoline trucks.
     4.  Fuel  economy was approximately  60  to 100%  greater  with the  diesel
     trucks for comparable truck categories

     5.    Total   particulate   matter,   CHLCK  %-extractables,   particulate
     organics, and  inert material  emissions  were  significantly greater  from
     the diesel  trucks.  With  the  diesel  trucks,  total  particulate  matter
     ranged from 2  to 9 times greater, CHpCl^ "-extractables ranged  from 60S
     to 80% greater,  particulate  organics  ranged  from 3 to 14  times  greater,
     and inert material  emissions ranged from 1 to  4 times greater  than the
     respective gasoline truck emission counterparts.

     6.  The  particle size fraction less than 2y  averaged over 80%  for  both
     gasoline and dieiel trucks.

The  current  data base  for heavy-duty  mobile sources  is  quite limited,  due
primarily  to  the  heavy-duty vehicle  certification   procedure  that  develops
work-specific gram  per  hp-hr emission  rates,  rather  than  the grams  per  mile
emission rates i.ormally required by air quality modelers (1).  The  few studies
in the heavy-duty mobile sources  data  base that report  data in  terms  of grams
per mile (1-4), indicate emission rates that  are comparable to  those  found in
this study.  Other conclusions and/or observations  of note  are:

     7.  HC,   CO,   total   particulate   emissions  and  fuel consumption  were
     especially  sensitive  to  the  characteristics  (i.e.,  average  speed,
     acceleration  rates,  and  cold  or  hot start)  of  the transient  driving
                                     44

-------
cycle.    The   more   rigorous   the  driving   cycle,   the   greater   the
above-mentioned emission rates.  HDTC  (18.9 mph  average  speed)  emissions
were greater than DRR  (24.7 mph  average  speed)  emissions;  cold-start Bag
1  (NYNF,  7.6  mph  average  speed)  emissions  were  the  greatest  of  the
composite HDTC.

8.  Newer vehicles  (in the same truck class) had lower emission ratPS.

9.  The 'S-extractables  rate  seemed related to engine  design;  engines in
the same engine family gave similar %-extractable rates.

10.   The  leaded  particulate  fraction  emission  rate  from  the  gasoline
trucks seemed related to engine design; engines in the sair.e engine family
emitted similar leaded particulate fractions.
                                 45

-------
cycle.   The   more  vigorous   the  driving   cycle,   the  greater   the
above-mentioned emission rates.  HDTC  (18.9 mph  average  speed)  emissions
were greater than  DRR  (24.7 mph  average  speed) emissions;  cold-start Bag
1  (NYNF,  7.6  mph  average  speed)  emissions  were  the  greatest  of  the
composite HDTC.

8.  Newer vehicles (in the same truck class)  had  lower emission  rates.

9.  The %-extractables rate seemed  related to  engine desig; engines  in
the same engine family gave similar *-extractable rates.

10.   The  leaded  participate  fraction emission  rate  from the  gasoline
trucks seemed related to engine design; engines in the same engine family
emitted similar leaded particulate fractions.
                                    46

-------
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

     The authors wish to thank Susan Bass for manuscript preparation,  Ben Maye
for vehicle preparation and driving, Roy  Carlson  for  vehicle  acquisition, Foy
King for performing  the  particulate emissions analysis, and  special  kudos  to
William  Ray  for  performing  the  gaseous  emissions  analysis  and   helpful
technical discussions.

     The content of this publication does  not  necesarily reflect  the  views  or
policies of the U.S.  Environmental  Prot°ction  Agency,  nor  does  the  mention  of
trade names,  commercial  products, or  organizations  imply  endorsement by  the
U.S. Government.
                                     47

-------
REFERENCES

1.   F. Black, W.  Ray,  F.  King, W.  Karches,  R.  Bradow, N. Perry,  J.  Duncan,
     and W.  Crews, "Emissions  From  In-Use  Heavy-Duty Gasoline  Trucks."   SAE
     Paper 841356, October 1984.

2.   H. A.  Harner-Selph  and  H. E. Dietzmann,  "Characterization  of  Heavy-Duty
     Motor  Vehicle  Emissions  Under Transient  Driving  Conditions."    Final
     Report  to  U.S.  Environmental   Protection  Agency  under  Contract  No.
     68-02-3722, October 1984.

3.   H.  E.   Dietzmann,  H.  A.  Parness,  and  R.  L.   Bradow,  "Emissions  from
     Gasoline and  Diesel  Delivery  Trucks  by Chassis  Transient Cycle."   Amer.
     Soc.  Mech. Engineers Paper No. 81-DGP-6, January 1081.

4.   H. E. Dietzmann, M. A. Parness, and R.  L.  Bradow,  "Emissions  from Trucks
     by Chassis Version  of the 1983  Transient Procedure."  SAE  paper  801371,
     October 1980.

5.   "Protecting  Our  Air." EPA Journal  10(7), U.S.  Environmental  Protection
     Agency, 1984.   United  States  Environmental  Protection Agency,  Office  of
     Public Affairs (A-107), Washington,  D.C. 20460.

6.   "National    Air   Pollution   Emissions   Estimates,   1940-1980.'    EPA
     450/4-82-001,  U.S.  Environmental  Protection Agency, Research  Triangle
     Park, N.C., January 1982.
                                      48

-------
7.   F. Black, J. Braddock, R.  Bradow, and M.  Ingalls,  "Highway Motor Vehicles             !
     as  Sources  of Atmospheric  Particles:   Projected Trends  1977  to  2000."
     Submitted for publication.

8.   C.  J.   France,  W.  Clemmons,  and  T.  Wysor,   "Recommended  Practice  for              ,
     Determining  Exhaust  Emissions  from  Heavy-Duty  Vehicles under  Tranrient
     Conditions."   Technical  Report  SDSB  79-08,  Ann Arbor,  Michigan,  U.S.
     Environmental Protection Agency,  February 1979.

9.   "Control of  Air  Pollution  from  New Motor Vehicles and  New Moto" Vehicle
     Engines; Participate  Regulation  for Heavy-Duty Diesel  Engines  (Proposed
     Rule)."  40 CFR,  Part 86,  Vol.  46,  No.  4, Part III:  1910-1967,  Janudry 7,
     1931.

10.  F.  Black,   and  L.  High,  "Methodology  for Determining  Particulate  and
     Gaseous Diesel Hydrocarbon Emissions."   SAE Paper  790422,  February 1979.

11.  W.  John,  and  G.  Reischl,   "A   Cyclone  for  Size-Selective  Sampling  of
     Ambient Air."  ,). Air Polldt.  Control Assoc.  30(8),  872-876,  1980.

12.  J. Wagman,  R. L.  Bennett,  and K.  T. Knapp,  "Simultaneous  MulHwavelength
     Spectrometer for  Rapid Elemental  Analysis of Particulate Pollutants."  In
     "X-ray  Fluorescence  Analysis of Environmental Samples,'1  pp.35-55,  Ann
     Arbor, Mich.: Ann Arbor Science  Publishers, Inc.,  1977.
                                       49

-------
13.  K.   Carpenter,   and   J.   H.   Johnson,   "Analysis   of   the   Physical



     Characteristics of  Diesel  Participate  Matter  Using Transmission  Electron



     Microscope Techniques."  SAE  Paper 790815,  September  1979.







14.  K. Habibi,  "Characterization of  Participate  Lead in  Vehicle Exhaust  -



     Experimental Techniques."   Environ.  Sci.  Technol.  4,  239-248,  1970.







15.  D. A.  Hirschler,  L.  F.   Gilbert,  F.   W.   Lamb,  and  L.   M.  Niebylski,



     "Particulate Lead Compounds  in Automobile Exhaust Gas."  Ind. Eng. Chem.



     49(7),  1131-1142, 1957.
                                  50

-------
                        APPENDIX A
Integrated/Weighted Gaseous and Particulate Emission Rates
for Gasoline and Diesel-Powered Trucks over the Heavy-Duty
         Transient Cycle and the Durham Road Route

                     (Tables Al - A14)
                          51

-------
             Table Al.  FUH413 - Class 28 - Gasoline Integrated/Weighted Gaseous
                               and Particulate Emission Rates
Emittant3
Heavy-Duty
Transient Cycle
HC
CO
N0x
MPG
Total Particulate
% Extractable
for*.. lYrianics
Inert f-'a -ial
Size Fraction <2y
Durham Road Route
HC
CO
NO
X
MPG
Total Particulate
% Extractable
Part. Organics
Inert Material
Size Fraction <2w
Cold Start

17.81 ± 2.74
100.71 ± 2.19
6.73 ± 0.53
8.79 ± 0.71
0.118 t 0.014
25.0 ± 1.4
0.030 ± 0.003
0.088 ± 0.011
84.3 ± 4.1

10.40 ± 2.50
58.87 ± 9.81
8.37 ± 0.55
10.38 ± 0.51
0.115 ± 0.0?0
26.6 ± 2.7
0.031 ± 0.007
0.084 ± 0.014
83.3 ± 2.9
*

4
3
3
3
4
4
4
4
4

4
3
3
4
4
4
4
4
4.
Hot Start

12.03 ± 0.50
76.90 ± 4.70
6.65 ± 0.24
9.80 ± 0.37
0.088 i 0.008
25.1 ± 2.8
0.022 ± 0.004
0.066 ± 0.005
87.2 ± 2.8

6.60 ± 0.76
42.80 ± 2.25
8.81 ± 0.79
11.14 ± 0.35
0.087 ± 0.006
28.7 ± 2.3
0.025 ± 0.003
0.063 ± 0.004
84.4 ± 4.1
Nb

7
7
6
7
7
7
7
7
7

8
8
6
8
8
7
7
7
7
Weighted

12.86 ± 0.89
80.30 ± 4.34
6.66 ± 0.28
9.66 ± 0.42
0.092 _ 0.009
25.1 ± 2.6
0.023 : 0.004
0.069 i 0.005
86.8 = 3.0

7.14 ± 1.01
45.10 ± 3.33
8.75 ± 0.75
11.03 ± . 0.37
0.091 ± 0.008
28.4 ± 2.4
0.026 ± 0.004
0.066 ± 0.005
84.2 ± 3.9
Emittant results are expressed in terms of crams/mile except flPG (expressed in miles
per gallon), and "-Extractable and Size Fraction <2u (both expressed in percents).
N = Number of valid runs.
                                        52

-------
            Table A2.  F2H411 - Class 28 - Gasoline Integrated/Weighted Gaseous
                              and Participate Emission Rates
Emittant3
Heavy-Duty
Transient Cycle
HC
CO
NOX
KPG
Total Particulate
% Extractable
Part. Organics
Inert Material
Size. Fraction <2p
Durham Road Route
KC
CO
h'°x
MrG
Total Particulate
% Extractable
Part. Organics
Inert Material
Size Fraction <2y
Cold Start

26.83 ± 1.71
88.61 ± 6.01
11.46 ± 0.91
7.68 ± 0.53
0.170 ± 0.004
26.4 ± 0.4
0.045 ± 0.001
0.125 ± 0.004
66.2 ± 2.2

11.27 ± 0.83
60.44 ± 2.44
12.57 ± 0.42
9.34 ± 0.14
0.122 ± 0.013
29.3 ± 3.7
0.036 ± 0.008
0.086 ± 0.004
78.8 ± 1.3
Nb

3
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
2

3
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
Hot Start

21.83 ± 0.18
66.34 ± 1.70
10.81 ± 0.75
8.95 ± 0.29
0.100 ± 0.002
29.7 ± 4.1
0.029 ± 0.070
0.070 ± 0.005
84.2 ± 12.9

9.32 ± 0.03
45.70 ± 0.59
12.38 ± 0.53
10.44 ± 0.15
0.097 ± 0.004
27.8 ± 3.1
0.027 ± 0.002
0.070 ± 0.005
76.8 ± 3.7
Nb

6
6
6
6
6
2
6
5
6

5
5
6
5
6
6
6
6
5
Weighted

22.54 s 0.40
69.52 ± 2.32
10.90 ± 0.77
8.77 ± 0.32
0.110 ± 0.002
29.2 ± 3.6
0.031 i 0.060
0.078 ± 0.005
81.6 i 11.4

9.60 ± 0.19
47.81 ± 0.85
12.41 ± 0.51
10.28 ± 0.15
0.101 ± 0.005
28.0 ± 3.2
0.028 ± 0.003
0.072 ± 0.005
77.1 ± 3.4
Emittant results are expressed in terms  of grams/mile  except  MPG  (expressed  in miles
per gallon), and "-Extractable and Size  Fraction  <2p  (both  expressed  in  percents).
N = Number of valid runs.
                                       53

-------
             Table A3.  VOY285 - Class 28 - Gasoline Integrated/Weighted Gaseous
                               and Participate Emission Rates
Emittarla
Heavy-Duty
Transient Cycle
HC
CO
NOX
MPG
Total Particulate
% Extractable
Part. Organics
Inert Material
Size. Fraction <2u
Durham Road Route
HC
CO
NOX
MPG
Total Particulate
% Extractable
Part. Organics
Inert Material
Size Fraction <2p
Cold Start

6.87 ± 0.80
116.15 ± 10.37
3.47 ± 0.07
8.35 ± 0.26
0.219 ± 0.012
58.0 ± 8.4
0.128 ± 0.025
0.091 ± 0.013
67.1 ± 2.0

2.96 ± 0.22
59.04 ± 8.97
4.08 ± 0.22
10.94 ± 0.66
0.213 ± 0.018
63.3 ± 5.0
0.135 ± 0.008
0.079 ± 0.017
87.9 ± 3.4
Nb

3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
^

3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
Hot Start

3.86 ± 0.30
77.13 ± 5.19
3.70 ± 0.13
9.68 t 0.26
0.119 ± 0.010
52.3 r 5.1
0.065 ± 0.006
0.054 - 0.005
33.2 ± 10.4

1.72 ± 0.12
39.93 ± 4.64
4.34 ± 0.14
12.16 ± 0.19
0.103 ± 0.005
50.8 ± 1.8
0.052 ± 0.004
0.051 ± 0.002
86.2 ± 3.3
Nb

6
6
6
6
5
6
5
5
6

6
5
5
6
6
6
6
6
5
Weighted

4.29 ± 0.40
82.70 r 5.93
3.67 ± 0.12
9.49 : 0.26
0.133 : 0.01C
53.1 = 5.6
0.074 : 0.00<
0.059 = 0.006
80.9 r 9.2

1.90 ± 0.13
42.66 = 5.26
4.30 r 0.15
11.99 = 0.26
0.119 ± 0.007
52.6 ± 2.3
0.064 ± 0.005
0.055 ± 0.004
86.4 ± 3.3
Emittant results are expressed in terms of crsnis/mile except MPG (expressed in miles
per gallon), and "-Extractable and Size Fraction <2u (both expressed in percents).
N = Number of valid runs.
                                        54

-------
               Table A4.   VOY338  - Class 2B - Gasoline  Integrated/Weighted Gaseous
                                 and  Participate Emission Rates
Emittant3
Heavy-Duty
Transient Cycle
HC
CO
N0x
MPG
Total Particulate
% Extractable
Part. Organics
Inert Material
Size. Fraction <2y
Durham Road Route
HC
CO
N0x
MPG
Total Particulate
% Extractable
Part. Organics
Inert Material
Size Fraction <2\i
Cold Start

9.38 ± 0.45
140.95 ± 12.12
4.06 ± 0.30
7.48 ± 0.09
0.250 ± 0.052
55.0 ± 10.6
0.143 ± 0.056
0.106 ± 0.008
78.8 ± 3.3

2.80 ± 0.30
56.18 ± 5.61
4.64 ± 0.42
10.74 ± 0.10
0.145 ± 0.026
49.8 ± 5.0
0.073 ± 0.020
0.072 ± 0.007
81.3 ± 10.6 .
#

3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3

3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
Hot Sta»-t

J.23 ± 0.25
27.95 ± 4.20
5.15 ± 0.21
9.59 ± 0.21
0.096 ± 0.016
49.2 ± 7.8
0.048 ± 0.015
0.049 ± 0.007
87.3 ± 14.2

1.71 ± 0.05
18.37 ± 2.38
5.35 ± 0.31
12.26 ± 0.10
0.079 ± 0.010
47.9 ± 5.1
0.038 ± 0.010
0.041 ± 0.003
81.5 ± 3.5
Nb

6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6

6
6
6
6
6
5
5
5
5
Weighted

4.11 ± 0.28
44.09 ± 5.33
4.99 ± 0.22
9.29 ± 0.19
0.118 ± 0.021
50.17 i 8.2
0.062 ± 0.021
0.057 ± 0.007
86.1 ± 12.6

1.87 ± 0.09
23.77 ± 2.84
5.25 ± 0.33
12.04 ± 0.10
0.088 ± 0.012
48.2 ± 5.1
0.043 ± 0.010
0.045 ± 0.004
81.4 ± 4.5
3 Emittant results are expressed in terms of grams/mile except  f1PG (expressed  in  miles
  per gallon), and %-Extractable and Size Fraction  <2p  (both expressed  in  percents).
  N = Number of valid runs.
                                           55

-------
             Table A5.  F3H633 - Class 5 - Gasoline Integrated/Weighted Gaseous
                               and Particulate Emission Rates
Emittant3
Heavy-Duty
Transient Cycle
HC
CO
N0x
MPG
Total Particulate
% Extractable
Part. Organics
Inert Material
Size Fraction <2u
Durham Road Route
HC
CO
NOX
MPG
Total Particulate
% Extractable
Part. Organics
Inert Material
Size Fraction <2\i
Cold Start

45.74 ± 3.05
405.16 ± 29.09
5.07 ± 0.70
4.95 ± 0.19
0.512 ± 0.042
28.4 ± 0.4
0.145 ± 0.010
0.367 ± 0.032
90.7 i 0.4

23.38 = 0.79
366.28 ± 7.02
5.65 = 0.29
5.59 ± 0.10
0.481 ± 0.034
27.8 ± 1.5
0.141 ± 0.015
0.359 ± 0.000
93.1 ± 8.0
Nb

4
4
4
4
2
2
2
2
2

4
4
4
4
3
3
2
2
3
Hot Start

32.03 t 2.16
365.01 ± 21.78
5.05 ± 0.13
5.42 ± 0.27
0.387 ± 0.080
25.4 ± 4.9
0.098 ± 0.026
0.288 i 0.063
75.0 ± 11.6

18.92 2 1.53
340.85 i 17.80
6.26 = 0.62
5.77 ± 0.27
0.317 ± 0.024
28.5 ± 2.4
0.088 ± 0.004
0.221 ± 0.024
96.7 ± 4.5
Nb

4
4
4
4
3
3
3
3
3

8
8
8
8
8
4
4
4
4
Weighted

33.99 ± 2.29
370.75 ± 22.84
5.91 ± 0.21
5.35 ± 0.26
0.405 i 0.074
25.8 ± 4.3
0.104 ± 0.024
0.299 i 0.059
77.2 : 10.0

19.56 i 1.42
.344.48 i 16.26
6.17 ± 0.57
5.74 ± 0.25
0.340 ± 0.025
28.4 ± 2.2
0.096 ± 0.006
0.241 ± 0.021
96.2 ± 5.0
Emittant results are expressed in terms of grams/mile except tlPG (expressed in miles
per gallon), and "-Extractable and Size Fraction <2p (both expressed in percents).
N = Number of valid runs.
                                         56

-------
             Table A6.  G63333 - Class 6 - Gasoline Integrated/Weighted Gaseous
                               and Particulate Emission Rates
Emittant3
Heavy-Duty
Transient Cycle
HC
CO
NOX
MPG
Total Particulat.e
X Extractable
Part. Organics
Inert Material
Size. Fraction <2u
Durham Road Roi.te
HC
CO
N0x
MPG
Total Particulate
% Extractable
Part. Organics
Inert Material
Size Fraction <2\\
Cold Start

44.28 ± 2.14
246.35 ± 25.90
8.38 ± 0.66
4.93 ± 0.23
' 0.712 i 0.041
38.9 ± 6.6
0.297 ± 0.017
0.415 ± 0.030
92.8 ± 7.4

23.71 ± 3.93
221.20 ± 13.17
10.03 ± 1.06
5.35 ± 0.22
0.637 ± 0.118
39.5 ± 3.2
0.249 ± 0.028
0.388 ± 0.092
97.6 ± 0.3
Nb

3
3
4
3
4
5
3
3
2

3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
Hot Start

29.87 ± 1.69
216.22 ± 13.09
9.62 ± 0.86
5.19 ± 0.11
0.483 ± 0.067
44.1 ± 3.0
0.217 ± 0.031
0.270 ± 0.047
96.5 ± 3.1

15.87 ± 1.05
195.29 ± 14.89
10.77 ± 1.04
5.71 ± 0.21
0.430 ± 0.054
38.1 ± 2.2
0.169 ± 0.012
0.277 ± 0.034
93.0 ± 4.2
«*

5
5
5
5
7
6
6
6
5

8
8
7
8
6
5
5
5
5
Weighted

31.93 1 1.75
220.52 i 14.92
9.44 ± 0.83
5.15 ± 0.13
0.516 ± 0.063
43.4 ± 3.5
0.228 ± 0.029
0.291 ± 0.045
96.0 ± • 3.7

16.99 ± 1.46
198.99 ± 14.64
10.66 ± 1.04
5.66 ± 0.21 .
0.460 ± 0.063
38.3 ± 2.3
0.180 ± 0.014
0.293 ± 0.042
93.7 i 3.6
Emittant results are expressed in terms  of grams/mile except  MPG  (expressed  in  miles
per gallon), and "-Extractable and Size  Fraction  <2p  (both expressed  in  percents).
N = Number of valid runs.
                                      57

-------
              Table A7.  FDW112 - Class 2B  Diesel Integrated/Weighted Gaseous
                               and Particulate Emission Rates
Emittant3
Heavy-Duty
Transient Cycle
HC
CO
NOX
MPG
Total Particulate
% Extractable
Part. Organics
Inert Material
Size Fraction <2y
Durham Road Route
HC
CO
N0x
MPG
Total Particulate
% Extractable
Part. Organics
Inert Material
Size Fraction <2\>
Cold Start

4.34 ± 0.36
8.56 ± 0.79
4.09 ± 0.39
11.31 ± 0.68
1.191 ± 0.163
76.8 ± 8.9
0.907 ± 0.198
0.284 ± 0.079
103.8 ± 1.1

3.09 ± 0.64
4.79 ± 0.29
3.02 ± 0.23
14.26 ± 0.21
0.985 ± 0.039
90.8 ± 1.0
0.899 ± 0.040
0.086 ± 0.004
101.1 ± 2.1
Nb

4
4
4
4
4
4
4
3
4

3
4
4
4
3
4
3
3
4
Hot Start

4.07 ± 0.41
7.37 ± 0.59
3.17 i 0.55
12.87 i 0.42
1.204 ± 0.190
86.6 ± 7.4
1.049 ± 0.224
0.155 ± 0.077
101.0 r 3.8

2.63 ± 0.41
4.30 ± 0.08
2.65 _ 0.14
15.44 ± C.44
0.871 ± 0.083
91.1 ± 0.8
0.794 ± 0.080
0.077 ± 0.006
100.0 ± 1.7
Nb

9
11
11
13
12
12
12
12
11

10
11
13
13
11
11
11
11
11
Weighted

4.11 ± 0.40
7.54 ± 0.62
3.30 ± 0.53
12.65 ± 0.46
1.202 t 0.186
85.2 ± 7.6
1.029 z 0.220
0.173 ± 0.077
101.4 ± 3.4

2.70 ± 0.44
4.37 r 0.11
2.70 ± 0.15
15.27 ± 0.41
0.887 ± 0.077
91.1 ± 0.8
0.809 t 0.074
0.078 ± 0.006
100.0 ± 2.6
Emittant results are expressed in terms of grams/mile except I1PG (expressed  in miles
per gallon), and %-Extractable and Size Fraction <2y (both expressed  in  percents).
N = Number of valid runs.
                                         58

-------
             Table A8.  CDR734 - Class 2B - Diesel Integrated/Weighted Gaseous
                              and Particulate Emission Rates
Emittant3
Heavy-Duty
Transient Cycle
HC
CO
NO
MPG
Total Particulate
a Extractable
Part. Organics
Inert Material
Size Fraction <2p
Durham Road Route
HC
CO
NOX
MPG
Total Particulate
% Extractable
Part. Organics
Inert Material
Size Fraction <2y
Cold Start

0.67 ± 0.05
2.21 ± 0.10
4.00 ± 0.29
14.38 ± 0.67
0.709 ± 0.101
39.1 ± 4.2
0.278 ± 0.058
0.431 ± 0.057
54.5 ± 7.0

0.44 ± 0.02
1.33 ± 0.07
4.20 ± 0.06
15.59 ± 0.28
0.316 ± 0.026
45.0 ± 2.5
0.142 ± 0.005
0.174 ± 0.022
67.2 ± 4.5
Nb

3
8
7
8
4
4
4
4
4

3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
Hot Start

0.42 ± 0.03
1.83 ± 0.09
4.17 ± 0.29
16.04 ± 0.57
0.432 ± 0.046
39.4 ± 5.0
0.174 ± 0.035
0.262 ± 0.034
70.7 ± 4.6

0.25 ± 0.01
1.14 ± 0.05
4.26 ± 0.22
17.09 ± 0.43
0.282 ± 0.028
45.3 ± 2.0
0.127 ± .0.008
0.155 ± 0.020
76.3 ± 5.0
Nb

3
15
14
14
7
7
7
7
7

3
11
11
12
8
8
8
8
8
Weighted

0.45 ± 0.03
1.88 ± 0.09
4.15 ± 0.29
15.80 ± 0.58
0.472 ± 0.054
39.4 ± 4.9
0.189 ± 0.038
0.286 ± 0.037
68.4 ± 4.9

0.28 ± 0.01
1.17 ± 0.05
4.25 ± 0.20
16.88 ± 0.41 .
0.287 ± 0.028
45.3 ± 2.1
0.129 ± 0.008
0.158 ± 0.020
75.0 ± 4.9
Emittant results are expressed in terms of grams/mile except MPG (expressed  in miles
per gallon), and S-Extractable and Size Fraction <2p (both expressed  in  percents).
N = Number of valid runs.
                                         59

-------
              Table A9.   FDP387 - Class 2B - Diesel  Integrated/Weighted Gaseous
                               and Participate Emission  Rates
1
Emittant3
Heavy-Duty
Transient Cycle
HC
CO
NOX
MPG
Total Particulate
f, Extractable
Part. Organics
Inert Material
Size Fraction <2\i
Durham Road Route
HC
CO
NO
HPG
Total Particulate
% Extractable
Part. Organics
Inert Material
Size Fraction <2u
Cold Start

0.62 ± 0.05
2.51 ± 0.11
7.71 ± 0.19
12.2 ± 0.16
0.697 ± 0.053
60.1 ± 5.7
0.417 ± 0.026
0.280 ± 0.057
64.4 ± 4.8

G.51 ± 0.07
1.91 ± 0.05
4.54 ± 0.12
14.8 ± 0.31
0.607 ± 0.029
58.2 ± 4.8
0.353 ± 0.032
0.254 ± 0.034
59.7 ± 7.3
Nb

3
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4

7
7
7
7
4
4
4
4
3
Hot Start

0.44 ± 0.04
2.19 ± 0.12
6.25 ± 0.09
14.3 ± 0.32
0.520 ± 0.012
71.4 ± 5.4
0.371 ± 0.027
0.149 ± 0.029
79.0 ± 3.2

0.40 ± 0.01
1.55 ± 0.05
4.47 ± 0.20
16.4 ± 0.20
0.476 ± 0.014
71.4 ± 2.7
0.340 ± 0.012
0.137 ± 0.016
79.6 ± 7.5
Nb

7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
6

3
11
11
11
8
8
8
8
7
Weighted

0.47 = 0.04
2.24 ± 0.12
6.46 ± 0.10
14.0 ± 0.28
0.545 ± 0.01*
69.8 ± 5.4
0.378 ± 0.025
0.168 ± 0.03;
76.9 ± 3.4

0.42 ± 0.02
1.60 ± 0.05
4.48 ± 0.19
16.2 ± 0.21
0.495 = 0.016
69.5 ± 3.0
0.342 ± 0.015
0.154 ± 0.019
76.8 t 7.5
Emittant results are expressed in terms of grams/mile except flPG (expressed  in  miles
per gallon), and "-Extractable and Size Fraction <2p (both expressed in  percents).
U = Number of valid runs.
                                           60

-------
               Table A10.  CDK7%A - Class 6 - Diesel Integrated/Weighted Gaseous
                                and Particulate Emission Rates
Emittant3
Heavy-Duty
Transient Cycle
HC
CO
NOX
MPG
Total Particulate
" Extractable
Part. Organics
Inert Material
Size. Fraction <2p
Durham Road Route
HC
CO
N0x
MPG
Total Particulate
% Extractable
Part. Organics
Inert Material
Size Fraction <2\>
Cold Start

4.88 ± 0.07
13.09 ± 0.49
9.50 ± 0.11
8.28 ± 0.10
2.191 ± 0.287
54.8 ± 9.7
1.212 ± 0.335
0.979 ± 0.178
100.9 ± 4.7

3.19 ± 0.08
8.60 ± 0.31
7.23 ± 0.49
10.12 ± 0.27
1.795 ± 0.061
34.5 ± 4.8
0.618 ± 0.065
1.177 ± 0.126
82.7 ± 15.7
Nb

3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3

3
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
2 '
Hot Start

4.06 ± 0.15
9.14 ± 0.38
9.27 ± 0.19
8.92 ± 0.04
1.627 ± 0.343
49.6 ± 8.9
0.758 ± 0.122
0.869 ± 0.221
104.0 ± 3.7

2.78 ± 0.13
6.84 ± 0.30
7.34 ± 0.44
10.76 ± 0.41
1.447 ± 0.094
34.0 ± 3.8
0.492 ± 0.034
0.963 ± 0.118
88.3 ± 14.7
Nb

7
7
7
7
4
5
4
4
5

6
6
6
6
6
5
5
5
6
Weighted

4.18 ± 0.14
9.70 ± 0.40
9.30 ± 0.18
8.83 ± 0.05
1.708 ± 0.335
50.3 ± 9.0
0.823 ± 0.153
0.883 ± 0.215
103.6 ± 3.8

2.84 ± 0.12
7.09 ± 0.30
7.32 a. 0.45
10.67 ± 0.39 .
1.497 ± 0.089
34.07 ± 3.9
0.510 ± 0.038
0.994 ± 0.119
87.5 ± 14.8
3 Emittant results are expressed in terms  of  grams/mile except MPG  (expressed in miles
  per gallon), and %-Extractable and Size  Fraction  <2v (both expressed  in percents).
  N = Number of valid runs.
                                          61

-------
                Table  All.   CDW780  -  Class 6  - Diesel  Integrated/Weighted Gaseous
                                 and  Particulate Emission Rates
Emittant9
Heavy-Duty
Transient Cycle
HC
CO
NOX
MPG
Total Particulate
% Extractable
Part. Organics
Inert Material
Size Fraction <2\i

Durham Road Route
HC
CO
NOX
MPG
Total Particulate
% Extractable
Part. Organics
Inert Material
Si/e Fraction <2u
Cold Start

4.03 ± n.45
9.21 ± 0.19
9.29 ± 0.28
8.67 ± 0.50
2.041 ± 0.263
48.5 ± 4.1
0.984 ± 0.092
1.057 ± 0.206
66.5 ± 8.2


2.21 ± 0.28
7.11 ± 0.21
8.97 ± 0.32
9.16 ± 0.34
1.435 ± 0.213
37.4 ± 4.4
0.531 ± 0.041
0.904 ± 0.190
71.9 ± 3.7
Nb

3
3
3
3
4
4
4
4
4


4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
Hot Start

2.71 ± 0.21
5.10 ± 0.30
8.79 ± 0.33
9.90 ± 0.22
1.298 ± 0.122
45.4 i 3.6
0.588 ± 0.058
0.710 ± 0.094
74.5 ± 2.8


1.84 ± 0.13
5.20 ± 0.35
9.30 ± 0.26
9.91 ± 0.13
1.142 ± 0.074
27.7 ± 2.5
0.366 ± 0.161
0.765 ± 0.202
73.2 ± 2.9
Nb

7
10
8
9
7
7
7
7
/


8
8
7
7
8
8
8
8
8
Weighted

2.90 ± 0.24
5.69 ± 0.28
8.86 ± 0.32
9.72 ± 0.26
1.404 ± 0.142
45.8 ± 3.7
0.646 ± 0.063
0.760 ± 0.110
73.4 ± 3.6


1.91 ± 0.15
5.47 ± 0.33
9.25 ± 0.27
9.81 ± 0.15 .
1.184 ± 0.094
29.1 ± 2.8
0.390 ± 0.144
0.785 ± 0.200
73.0 ± 3.0
3 Emittant results are expressed in terms  of grams/mile  except  MPG  (expressed  in miles
  per gallon), and %-Extractable and Size  Fraction  <2y  (both  expressed  in  percents).
  N = Number of valid runs.
                                          62

-------
                Table A12.   FDW161 - Class 6 - Diesel Integrated/Weighted Gaseous
emu rdr i nil id ie Liillbbiun KdT,65
Emittant3
Heavy-Duty
Transient Cycle
HC
CO
N0x
MPG
Total Parti cuidte
% Extractable
Part. Organics
Inert Material
Size. Fraction <2u
Durham Road Route
HC
CO
N0x
MPG
Totsl Particulate
% Extractable
Part. Organics
Inert Material
Size Fraction <2p
Cold Start

2.87 ± 0.06
8.75 ± 0.51
10.97 ± 0.54
9.77 ± 0.30
1.253 ± 0.029
54.8 ± 6.7
0.687 ± 0.087
0.566 ± 0.085
70.4 ± 3.2

1.55 ± 0.04
6.24 ± 0.31
, 9.54 i 0.12
10.25 ± 0.26
0.995 ± 0.087
49.4 t 2.5
0.490 ± 0.022
0.505 ± 0.068
74.7 ± 6.7
Nb

4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4

3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
Hot Start

2.12 ± 0.14
5.12 ± 0.46
10.85 ± 0.22
11.08 ± 0.25
0.680 ± 0.072
44.5 ± 5.5
0.306 ± 0.055
0.374 ± C.053
77.5 t 4.1

1.15 ± f;.04
4.05 ± 0.16
9.74 ± 0.23
11.19 ± 0.23
0.611 ± 0.037
34.7 ± 2.7
0.211 ± 0.011
0.400 ± 0.038
73.2 ± 4.0
i
Nb

8
o
7
8
7
8
7
7
7

6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
Weighted
i
i
2.24 ± 0.13 •
i
5.64 ± 0.47 '
10.87 ± 0.27
10.89 ± 0.26
0.762 ± 0.066
46.0 ± 5.7
0.360 ± 0.059
0.401 ± 0.053
76.5 ± 4.0

1.21 ± 0.04
4.36 ± 0.18
9.71 ± 0.21
11.06 ± 0.23 .
0.666 ± 0.044
36.8 ± 2.7
0.251 ± 0.013
0.415 ± 0.042
73.4 ± 4.4
3 Emittant results are expressed in terns  of grams/mile  exceot  MPG  (expressed  in miles
  per gallon), and "-Extractable and Size  Fraction  <2u  (both  expressed  in  percents).
  N = Number of valid rins.
                                          63

-------
                Table A13.  FDB420 - Class 6 - Diesel  Integrated/weighted  Gaseous
                                  and Particulate Emission Rates
Em'ttant3
Heavy-Duty
Transient Cycle
HC
CO
NOX
KPG
Total Particulate
2 Extractable
Part. Organics
Inert Material
Size Fraction <2u
Durham Road Route
HC
CO
NOX
MPG
Total Particulate
% Extractable
Part. Organics
Inert Material
Size Fraction <2y
Cold Start

7.71 ± 0.87
12.01 ± 1.08
14.07 ± 0.32
9.11 ± 0.16
3.105 ± 0.423
77.1 i 5.8
2.388 t 0.339
0.713 : 0.239
79.5 - 6.7

5.15 i O.Oo
8.42 ± 0.26
11.64 ± 0.20
9.83 ± 0.11
2.411 ± 0.210
84.4 ± 4.2
2.029 ± 0.070
0.371 ± 0.212
87.3 ± 7.5
*

4
4
3
4
4
4
4
4
3

3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
Hot Start

5.99 ± 0.26
7.45 * 0.46
13.24 : 0.72
10.33 = 0.44
2.070 ; 0.071
79.1 = 3.0
1.5SS _ 0.191
0.482 ± 0.142
87.3 - 5.4

4.61 : 0.16
6.26 ± 0.31
11.37 ± 0.70
10.60 ± 0.11
1.863 i 0.033
85.0 * 3.6
1.583 ± 0.048
0.281 ± 0.072
90.6 ± 3.1
Nb

6
8
6
8
8
8
8
Q
s

6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
Weighted

6.24 ± 0.35
8.10 ± 0.55
13.36 t 0.66
10.16 ± 0.40
2.218 ± 0.121
78.8 i 3.4
1.702 i 0.212
0.516 t 0.156
86.2 ± 5.6

4.69 ± 0.15
6.57 ± 0.30
11.41 ± 0.63
10.49 = 0.11
1.941 t 0.060
84.9 ± 3.7
1.647 ± 0.051
0.294 ± 0.092
90.1 ± 3.7
3 Emittant results are expressed in terns of grams/mile  except  HPG  (expressed  in miles
  per gallon), and "-Extractable and Size Fraction  <2y  (both  expressed  in percents).
  N = Number of valid runs.
                                          64

-------
             Table A14.   CDW786B  -  Class 6 - Diesel Integrated/Weighted Gaseous
                               and Particulate Emission Rotes
Emittant3
Heavy-Duty
Transient Cycle
HC
CO
NOX
MPG
Total Particulate
r, Extractable
Part. Organics
Inert Material
Size. Fraction <2y
Durham Road Route
HC
CO
fi°x
MPG
Total Particulate
% Extractable
Part. Organics
Inert Material
Size Fraction <2y
Cold Start

6.45 ± 0.39
15.28 ± 1.17
9.43 ± 0.64
8.72 ± 0.21
3.029 ± 0.226
54.3 ± 4.6
1.647 ± 0.220
1.3S2 ± 0.142
61.4 ± 9.4










Nb

3
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4










Hot Start

3.55 ± 0.24
8.97 ± 0.70
9.47 ± 0.15
9.61 ± 0.13
1.730 ± 0.192
46.5 ± 7.6
0.802 ± 0.134
0.928 ± 0.195
66.3 ± 5.1

1.99 t 0.27
6.94 ± 0.50
8.72 ± 0.54
9.66 ± 0.24
1.547 * 0.239
30.0 ± 5.0
0.456 ± 0.052
1.091 ± 0.240
63.0 ± 6.1
Nb

7
8
6
8
4
4
4
4
4

7
7
7
7
8
8
8
8
8
Weighted

3.96 ± 0.26
9.87 ± 0.76
9.46 ± 0.22
9.48 ± 0.14
1.916 ± 0.19;
47.6 ± 7.2
0.923 ± O.K6
0.993 ± 0.1S7
65.6 ± 5.7










Emittant results are expressed in terms of grams/mile except  MPG  (expressed  in miles
per gallon), and S-Extractable and Size Fraction  <2u  (both  expressed  in  percents).
N = Number of valid runs.
                                         65

-------
                        APPENDIX B
Heavy-Buty Transient Cycle Individual Bag Gaseous Emission
       Rates for Gasoline and Diesel-Powered Trucks

                     (Tables Bl - B14)
                             66

-------
                   Table 81.   FUH413  - Class 2B - Gasoline HDTC Individual Bag
                                       Gaseous Emission Rates
Emittant3
HC Bag-1
HC Bag-2
HC Bag-3
HC Bag-4
Integrated HC
CO Bag-1
CO Bag-2
CO Bag-3
CO Bag-4
Integrated CO
NOx Bag-1
NOx Bag-2
NOx Bag-3
NOx Bag-4
Integrated NOx
MPG Bag-1
MPG Bag-2
MPG Bag-3
MPG Bag-4
In teg. -a ted KPG
Cold Start
32.36 ± 6.25
20.29 i 2.02
3.12 ± 0.31
18.26 ± 1.79
17.81 ± 2.74.
170.69 ± 15.83
86.91 ± 3.32
23.45 ± 2.10
118.27 ± 1.50
100.71 ± 2.19
6.02 ± 0.91
5.06 ± 0.49
10.63 ± 0.73
5.33 ± 0.60
6.73 ± 0.53
5.75 ± 0.14
9.73 ± 0.69
11.35 ± 0.08
9.01 ± 0.44
8.79 ± 0.71
Nb
3
3
3
3
4
3
3
3
3
3
4
3
4
3
3
3
3
4
3
3
Hot Start
16.23 ± 0.53
11.95 ± 1.103
2.33 ± 0.18
18.21 ± 0.94
12.03 ± 0.50
105.76 ± 2.20
68.57 ± 6.36
16.95 ± 1.33
123.32 ± 2.52
76.90 ± 4.70
5.67 ± 0.19
5.57 ± 0.28
10.72 ± 0.28
4.57 ± 0.25
6.65 ± 0.24
8.17 ± 0.19
11.30 ± 0.20
11.66 ± 0.14
9.15 ± 0.50
9.80 ± 0.37
Nb
4
8
6
5
7
5
8
5
4
7
4
8
6
5
6
6
5
7
7
7
Weighted




12.86 ± 0.89




80.30 ± 4.34




6.66 ± 0.28




9.66 ± 0.42
a Emittant results are expressed in terms of grams/mile except MPG,
  which is expressed in miles per gallon.
  N = Number of valid runs.
                                           67

-------
                 Table B2.  F2H411 - Class 2B - Gasoline HDTC  Individual Bag
                                    Gaseous Emission Rates
Emittant3
HC Bag-1
HC Bag-2
HC Bag-3
HC Bag-4
Integrated HC
CO Bag-1
CO Bag-2
CO Bag-3
CO Bag-4
Integrated CO
NOx Bag-1
NOx Bag-2
NOx Bag-3
NOx Bag-4
Integrated NOx
MPG Bag-1
MPG Bag-2
MPG Bag-3
MPG Bag-4
Integrated MPG
Cold Start
49.27 ± 4.51
23.20 ± 1.56
4.49 ± 0.22
31.92 ± 3.60
26.83 ± 1.71
137.90 ± 13.264
82.28 ± 6.26
37.17 ± 1.29
100.46 r 11.77
88.61 ± 6.01
12.08 ± 1.90
8.71 ± 0.82
15.85 ± 0.93
9.30 ± 0.40
11.46 ± 0.91
5.37 ± 0.77
9.26 ± 0.49
10.75 ± 0.02
7.31 ± 0.17
7.68 ± 0.53
Nb
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
Hot Start
34.08 ± 0.74
19.23 ± 0.95
3.95 ± 0.24
31.30 ± 0.50
21.83 ± 0.18
85.46 - 8.89
54.42 : 4.02
28.33 t 0.91
97.45 t 9.64
66.34 ± 1.70
9.38 ± 0.77
8.74 ± 0.41
16.05 ± 0.81
8.61 ± 0.93
10.81 ± 0.75
7.49 ± 0.21
10.60 ± 0.28
11.29 ± 0.10
7.59 ± 0.34
8.95 ± 0.29
Nb
6
6
6
6
6
6
5
6
6
6
4
5
6
5
6
4
6
6
6
6
Weighted




22.54 ± 0.40




69.52 ± 2.32




10.90 ± 0.77




8.77 ± 0.32
Emittant results are expressed in terms of grams/mile except MPG,
which is expressed in miles per gallon.

N = Number of valid runs.
                                         68

-------
                 Table B3.  VOY285 - Class 2B - Gasoline HDTC Individual Bag
                                   Gaseous Emission Rates
Emittant3
HC Bag-1
HC Bag-2
HC Bag-3
HC Bag-4
Integrated HC
CO Bag-1
CO Bag-2
CO Bag-3
CO Bag-4
Integrated CO
NOx Bag-1
NOx Bag-2
NOx Bag-3
NOx Bag-4
Integrated NOx
MPG Bag-1
MPG Bag-2
MPG Bag-3
MPG Bag-4
Integrated MPG
Cold Start
13.06 ± 2.57
7.93 ± 0.74
1.45 ± 0.21
5.18 ± 0.61
6.87 ± 0.80
197.96 ± 43.72
110.62 ± 8.38
24.90 ± 0.85
136.47 ± 9.12
116.15 ± 10.37
3.18 ± 0.43
3.09 ± 0.13
4.49 ± 0.64
3.09 ± 0.11
3.47 ± 0.07
6.37 ± 0.63
9.12 ± 0.20
12.22 ± 0.04
7.52 ± 0.29
8.3b ± 0.26
Nb
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
Hot Start
6.10 ± 0.43
3.74 ± 0.41
1.09 ± 0.06
4.05 ± 0.38
3.86 ± 0.30
99.03 ± 10.24
72.33 ± 3.00
17.16 ± 1.20
115.72 ± 6.91
77.13 ±. 5.19
3.01 ± 0.31
3.39 ± 0.13
5.00 ± 0.21
3. 38 ± 0.22
3.70 ± 0.13
8.45 ± 0.56
10.78 ± 0.38
13.01 ± 0.14
7.83 ± 0.27
9.68 ± 0.26
Nb
5
5
6
6
6
5
5
5
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
Weighted




4.29 ± 0.40




82.70 ± 5.93




3.67 ± 0.12




9.49 ± 0.26
Emittant results are expressed in terms of grams/mile except MPG,
which is expressed in miles per gallon.
N = Number of valid runs.
                                          69

-------
                 Table B4.  VOY338 - Class 2B - Gasoline HDTC Individual  Bag
                                   Gaseous Emission Rates
Emittant3
HC Bag-1
HC Bag-2
HC Bag-3
HC Bag-4
Integrated HC
CO Bag-1
CO Bag-2
CO Bag-3
CO Bag-4
Integrated CO
NOx Bag-1
NOx Bag-2
NOx Bag-3
NOx Bag-4
Integrated NOx
MPG Bag-1
MPG Bag-2
MPG Bag-3
MPG Bag-4
Integrated MPG
Cold Start
27.32 ± 3.40
5.59 ± 1.33
1.54 i 0.14
3.96 ± 0.19
9.38 ± 0.45 •
424.36 ± 29.90
62.26 ± 8.98
20.64 ± 0.01
43.01 ± 0.06
140.95 ± 12.12
1.76 ± 0.21
4.18 i 0.15
5.57 ± 0.36
4.04 ± 0.35
4.06 ± 0.30
4.15 ± 0.18
10.20 ± 0.35
12.75 ± 0.16
8.04 ± 0.20
7.48 ± 0.09
Nb
3
3
3
3
3
2
3
2
2
3
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
Hot Start
5.67 ± 0.57
2.64 ± 0.16
1.27 ± 0.04
3.36 ± 0.10
3.23 ± 0.25
41.87 ± 4.71
24.26 ± 3.35
12.74 ± 0.47
31.63 ± 2.17
27.95 ± 4.20
5.31 ± 0.39
4.69 ± 0.24
6.40 ± 0.30
4.13 ± 0.23
5.15 ± 0.21
7.06 ± 0.18
11.71 ± 0.37
13.39 ± 0.17
8.38 ± 0.30
9.59 ± 0.21
Nb
5
6
6
5
6
4
5
5
4
6
5
6
6
5
6
6
6
6
6
6
Weighted




4.11 ± 0.28




44.09 ± 5.33




4.99 ± 0.22




9.29 ± 0.19
Emittant results are expressed in terms of grams/mile except MPG,
which is expressed in rr.iles per gallon.
N = Number of valid runs.
                                             70

-------

                  Table 85.   F3H633  -  Class  5  -  Gasoline  HDTC  Individual  Bag
                                    Gaseous  Emission  Rates
Emittant3
HC Bag-1
HC Bag-2
HC Bag-3
HC Bag-4
Integrated HC
CO Bag-1
CO Bag-2
CO Bag-3
CO Bag-4
Integrated CO
NOx Bag-1
NOx Bag-2
NOx Bag-3
NOx Bag-4
Integrated NOx
MPG Bag-1
MPG Bag-2
MPG Bag-3
MPG Bag-4
Integrated MPG
Cold Start
70.36 ± 8.99
43.65 ± 1.89
11.67 ± 0.56
50.90 ± 2.92
45.74 ± 3.05
434.02 ± 73.84
332.16 ± 17.60
395.04 ± 6.59
410.24 ± 48.52
405.16 ± 29.09
5.55 ± 0.73
6.46 ± 0.32:
6.88 ± 0.69
4.53 ± 0.31
5.07 ± 0.70
4.48 ± 0.57
5.76 ± 0.14
5.35 ± 0.10
4.56 ± 0.32
4.95 ± 0.19
Nb
3
3
3
3
4
3
3
3
3
4
3
3
3
4
4
3
4
3
3
4
Hot Start
35.71 ± 3.74
33.82 ± 1.92
11.25 ± 0.36
48.18 ± 8.46
32.03 ± 2.16
364.49 ± 34.51
294.33 ± 0.34
394.13 ± 20.84
422.67 ± 22.32
365.03 ± 21.78
5.35 ± 0.39
6.49 ± 0.34
6.52 ± 0.52
5.21 ± 0.70
6.05 ± 0.13
5.16 ± 0.24
6.04 ± 0.38
5.45 ± 0.16
4.80 ± 0.41
5.42 ± 0.27
Nb
4
4
4
4
4
5
6
6
4
4
4
4
5
4
4
4
6
6
5
4
Weighted




33.99 ± 2.29




370.75 ± 22.84




5.91 ± 0.21
/



5.35 ± 0.26
N = Number of valid runs.
                                        of
                                          71

-------
                   Table B6.  G63333 - Class 6 - Gasoline HDTC Individual  Bag
                                     Gaseous Emission Rates
Emittant3
HC Bag-1
HC Bag-2
HC Bag-3
HC Bag-4
Integrated HC
CO Bag-1
CO Bag-2
CO Bag-3
CO Bag-4
Integrated CO
NOx Bag-1
NOx Bag-2
NOx Bag-3
NOx Bag-4
Integrated NOx
MPG Bag-1
MPG Bag-2
MPG Bag-3
MPG Bag-4
Integrated MPG
Cold Start
89.50 ± 14.71
40.82 ± 3.95
10.03 ± 1.13
39.94 ± 3.21
44.28 ± 2.14
417.09 ± 88.37
179.09 ± 9.92
163.49 ± 20.10
311.35 ± 30.22
246.35 ± 25.90
7.05 ± 0.63
8.55 ± 0.42
9.42 ± 1.76
9.04 ± 1.14
8.38 ± 0.66
3.67 ± 0.48
5.48 ± 0.48
6.68 ± 0.39
4.61 ± 0.36
4.93 ± 0.23
Nb
3
3
4
4
3
3
2
4
4
3
3
3
4
4
4
3
3
4
4
3'
Hot Start
45.76 ± 3.73
30.15 ± 3.42
8.32 ± 0.87
34.82 ± 2.77
29.87 t 1.69
285.25 = 38.39
194.19 ± 26.44
155.00 ± 17.71
297.78 ± 24.51
216.22 ± 13.09
11.04 i 1.02
9.88 r 0.96
10.50 ± 0.88
9.82 r 0.34
9.62 ± 0.86
4.30 ± 0.13
5.49 ± 0.19
6.74 ± 0.17
4.53 ± 0.16
5.19 ± 0.11
Nb
8
7
8
8
5
8
6
6
6
5
6
6
6
6
5
8
7
8
7
5
Weighted




31.93 ± 1.75




220.52 ± 14.92




9.44 ± 0.83




5.15 ± 0.13
  Errittant results are expressed in terms of grams/mile except MPG,
  which is expressed in miles per gallon.

b
  N = Number of valid runs.
                                            72

-------
                  Table B7.   FDW112 - Class 2B - Diesel HDTC Individual Bag
                                   Gaseous Emission Rates
Emittant9
HC Bag-1
HC Bag-2
HC Bag-3
HC Bag-4
Integrated HC
CO Bag-1
CO Bag-0
CO Bag-3
CO Bag-4
Integrated CO
NOx Bag-1
NOx Bag-2
NOx Bag-3
NOx Bag-4
Integrated NOx
MPG Bag-1
MPG Bag-2
MPG Bag-3
MPG Bag-4
Integrated MPG
Cold Start
3.83 ± 0.63
3.93 ± 0.39
3.75 ± 0.02
5.46 ± 0.77
4.34 ± 0.36
12.86 ± 1.14
8.92 ± 0.19
4.39 ± 0.94
8.98 ± 0.50
8.56 ± 0.79
6.12 ± 0.46
3.00 ± 0.25
2.67 ± 0.23
4.33 ± 0.32
4.09 ± 0.39
7.45 ± 0.37
15.16 ± 0.59
14.88 ± 0.10
10.85 ± 0.54
11.31 ± 0.68
Nb
3
4
3
4
4
3
3
5
5
4
3
4
4
4
4
3
3
3
5
4
Hot Start
4.86 ± 0.41
2.97 ± 0.21
3.47 ± 0.13
5.47 ± 0.76
4.07 ± 0.41
12.48 ± 0.82
5.83 ± ' 0.23
4.42 ± 0.16
9.20 ± 0.45
7.37 ± 0.59
3.63 ± 0.66
2.07 ± 0.06
2.18 ± 0.38
2.97 ± 0.25
3.17 ± 0.55
10.41 ± 0.31
16.61 ± 0.30
15.49 ± 0.12
11.55 ± 0.43
'l2. 87 ± 0.42
Nb
8
8
8
8
9
8
8
8
7
11
7
4
7
4
11
8
7
8
8
13
Weighted




4.11 ± 0.40




7.54 ± 0.62




3.30 ± 0.53




12.65 ± 0.46
Emittant results are expressed in terms of grams/mile except MPG,
which is expressed in miles per gallon.

N = Number of valid runs.
                                             73

-------
                  Table 88.  CDR734 - Class 2B - Diesel  HDTC Individual  Bag
                                   Gaseous Emission Rates
Emittanta
HC Bag-1
HC Bag-2
HC Bag-3
HC Bag-4
Integrated HC
CO Bag-1
CO Bag-2
CO Bag-3
CO Bag-4
Integrated CO
NOx Bag-1
NOx Bag-2
KOx Bag-3
NOx Bag-4
Integrated NOx
HPG Bag-1
MPG Bag-2
MPG Bag-3
MPG Bag-4
Integrated MPG
Cold Start
1.00 ± 0.14
0.62 ± 0.05
0.30 ± 0.03
0.78 ± 0.06
0.67 ± 0.05
3.65 ± 0.30
2.34 ± 0.11
0.95 ± 0.03
1.97 ± 0.12
2.21 ± 0.10
5.48 ± 0.58
2.85 ± 0.28
3.37 ± 0.28
4.49 ± 0.31
4.00 t 0.29
10.17 ± 0.63
17.43 ± C.40
16.19 ± 0.20
14.59 ± 0.87
14.38 ± 0.67
Nb
3
7
7
3
3
8
8
8
8
8
7
7
7
7
7
6
6
8
8
8
Hot Start
0.53 ± 0.06
0.35 ± 0.04
0.22 ± 0.01
0.62 ± 0.07
0.42 ± 0.03
2.87 ± 0.15
1.62 ± 0.09
0.88 ± 0.03
1.99 ± 0.17
1.83 ± 0.09
4.91 ± 0.46
3.14 ± 0.32
3.84 ± 0.26
4.93 ± 0.51
4.17 i 0.29
13.71 ± 0.67
20.33 ± 1.00
16.88 ± 0.34
14.44 ± 0'.78
16.04 ± 0.57
Nb
4
4
5
3
3
14
15
14
15
15
14
14
14
14
14
14
15
15
14
14
Weighted




0.45 ± 0.03




1.88 ± 0.09




4.15 ± 0.29




15.80 ± 0.58
Emittant results are expressed in terms of grams/mile except MPG,
which is expressed in miles per gallon.                       . •  .

N = Number of valid runs.
                                           74

-------
                  Table B9.  FDP387 - Class 2B - Diesel HDTC Individual  Bag
                                   Gasecus Emission Rates
Emittant3
HC Bag-1
HC Ba.;-2
HC Bag-3
HC Bag-4
Integrated HC
CO Bag-1
CO Bag-2
CO Bag-3
CO Bag-4
Integrated CO
NOx Bag-1
NOx Bag-2
NOx Bag-3
NOx Bag-4
Integrated NOx
MPG Bag-1
MPG Bag-2
MPG Bag-3
MPG Bag-4
Integrated MPG
Cold Start
0.70 ± 0.12
0.51 T 0.03
0.53 ± 0.04
0.76 ± 0.06
0.62 ± 0.05
3.30 ± 0.15
2.51 ± 0.13
1.87 t 0.06
2.40 ± 0.15
2.51 ± 0.11
15.17 t 0.67
4.81 t 0.16
3.48 ± 0.21
7.94 ± 0.53
7.71 ± 0.19
7.84 ± 0.26
16.10 ± 0.07
15.83 i 0.24
12.93 ± 0.31
12.23 ± 0.16
Nb
3
3
-r
3
3
4
4
4
4
4
4
4'
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
Hot Start
0;33 ± 0.04
0.28 ± 0.03
0.41 t 0.02
0.73 ± 0.07
0.44 ± 0.04
3.05 ± 0.17
1.80 ± 0.12
1.50 ± 0.07
2.48 ± 0.26
2.19 ± 0.12
8.04 ± 0.30
5.15 ± 0.14
3.65 ± 0.07
8.44 ± .0.26
6.25 ± 0.09
11.52 ± 0.56
18.23 ± 0.53
16.44 ± 0.13
12.83 ± 0.64
14.30 ± 0.32
Nb
5
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
6
6
6
7
Weighted




0.47 ± 0.04




2.24 ± 0.12




6.46 ± 0.1C




14.00 ± 0.28
Emittant results are expressed in terms of grams/mile except MPG,
which is expressed in miles per gallon.
N = Number of valid runs.
                                          75

-------
                  Table BIO.  CDW786 - Class 6 - Diesel  HDTC Individual  Bag
                                   Gaseous Emission Rates
Emittant3
HC Bag-1
HC Bag-2
HC Bag-3
HC Bag-4
Integrated HC
CO Bag-1
CO Bag-2
'CO Bag-3
CO Bag-4
Integrated CO
NOx Bag-1
f.'Ox Bag-2
N'Ox Bag-3
NOx Bag-4
Integrated NOx
MPG Bag-1
MPG Bag-2 '
MPG Bag-3
MPG Bag-4
Integrated MPG
Cold Start
7.51 ± 0.38
4.45 + 0.03
1.66 ± 0.05
6.12 ± 0.46
4.88 ± 0.07
27.17 ± 2.08
10.63 ± 0.33
4.61 ± 0.42
10.68 ± 0.13
13.09 ± 0.49
12.33 ± 0.88
8.03 ± 0.37
6.67 ± 0.03
11.31 x 0.86
9.50 ± 0.11
6.09 ± 0.20
9.45 ± 0.17
10.57 ± 0.17
8.27 ± 0.38
8.28 ± 0.10
Nb
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
Hot Start
4.65 t 0.17
3.98 t 0.17
1.59 t 0.04
6.18 ± 0.33
4.06 ± 0.15
13.95 ± 0.69
8.12 ± 0.43
4.34 ± 0.29
10.52 i 0.88
9.14 ± 0.38
11.14 = 0.55
7.88 ± 1.51
6.58 ± 0.15
12.09 ± 1.02
9.27 ± 0.19
7.38 ± 0.11
9.87 ± 0.25
10.83 ± 0.15
8.24 ± 0.12
8.92 ± 0.04
Nb
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
6
6
6
7
7
6
7
7
7
7
Weighted




4.18 ± 0.14




9.70 ± 0.40




9.30 ± 0.18




8.83 ± 0.05
Emittant results are expressed in terms of grams/mile except MPG,
which is expressed in miles per gallon.
N = Number of valid runs.
                                            76

-------
                                                                                              1
                     Tabla  B1.!.   CDW780  -  Class 6  - Diesel HDTC  Individual Bag
                                     Gaseous  Emission  Rates
Emittant3
HC Bag-1
HC Bag-2
HC Bag-3
HC Bag-4
Integrated HC
CO Bag-1
CO Bag-2
CO Bag-3
CO Bag-4
Integrated. CO
NOx Bag-1
NOx Bag-2
NOx Bag-3
NOx Bag-4
Integrated NOx
MPG Bag-1
MPG Bag-2
MPG Bag-3
MPG Bag-4
Integrated MPG
Cold Start
7.32 ± 1.29
4.14 ± 0.08
1.52 ± 0.10
4.31 ± 0.73
4.03 ± C.45
17.87 ± 1.93
8.50 ± 0.15
3.62 ± 0.19
6.40 ± 0.46
9.21 ± 0.19
13.17 ± 1.14
7.86 ± 0.56
5.98 ± 0.39
10.51 ± 0.95
9.29 ± 0.28
6.50 ± 0.93
9.58 ± 0.30
13.53 ± 0.62
9.36 ± 0.09
8.67 ± 0.50
Nb
3
3
3
3
3
4
4
4
4
3
3
3
3
3
3
4
4
4
4
3
Hot Scan
2.88 ± 0.36
2.74 ± 0.14
1.26 ± 0.05
4.06 ± 0.33
2.71 ± 0.21
7.12 ± 0.50
4.93 ± 0.39
2.91 i 0.16
5.45 ± 0.40
5.10 ± 0.30
11.12 ± 0.77
7.67 i 0.22
5.79 ± 0.32
11.06 ± 0.48
8.79 ± 0.33
8.60 ± 0.42
10.81 ± 0.35
11.90 ± 0.46
9.08 ± O.FO
9.90 ± 0.22
Nb
6
6
5
5
7
9
10
10
10
10
8
8
8
5
8
10
10
10
10
9
Weighted




2.90 ± 0.24




5.69 ± 0.28




8.86 ± 0.32



j
9.72 ± 0.26
a Emittant results are expressed in terms of grams/mile except MPG,
  which is expressed in mileo per gallon.
  N = Number of valid runs.
                                              77

-------
                  Table B12.  FDW161 - Class 6 - Diesel HDTC Individual  Bag
                                   Gaseous Emission Pates
Entittant3
HC Bag-1
HC Bag-2
HC Bag-3
HC Bag-^
Integrated HC
CO Bag-1
CO Bag-2
CO Bag-3
CO Bag-4
Integrated CO
NOx Bag-1
NOx Bag-2
NOx Bag-3
NOx Bag-4
Integrated NOx
MPG Bag-1
MPG Bag-2
MPG Bag-3
MPG Bag-4
Integrated MPG
Cold Start
4.89 ± 0.57
2.71 t 0.38
1.04 ± 0.12
2.88 t 0.16
2.87 ± 0.06.
18.23 i 2.15
7.96 * 0.62
3.48 ± 0.08
5.63 ± 0.31
8.75 ± 0.51
14.24 ± 1.00
9.66 ± 0.64
7.75 ± 0.32
12.57 ± 0.32
10.97 ± 0.54
7.00 ± 0.34
11.09 ± 0.79
12.34 ± 0.19
10.24 + 0.47
9.77 ± 0.30
Nb
4
4
3
4
4
4
4
4
4
,1
H
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
Hot Start
2.50 ± 0.29
2.11 t 0.21
1.11 ± 0.11
2.83 ± 0.17
2.12 ± 0.14
7.61 ± 0.83
4.66 ± 0.37
2.80 ± 0.10
4.9S ± 0.13
5.12 ± 0.46
13.44 i 0.67
9.35 ± 0.33
8.C5 ± 0.09
13.24 ± 0.46
10.85 ± 0.22
9.20 ± 0.47
12.84 ± 0.57
12.72 ± 0.11
10.27 ± 0.38
11.08 ± 0.25
Nb
8
8
8
8
8
7
7
8
7
8
8
8
7
8
7
8
8
8
3
8
Weighted




2.24 ± 0.13




5.64 r 0.47




10.87 = 0.27




10.89 : 0.26
Emittant results are expressed in verms of grans/mile except MPG,
which is expressed in miles per gallon.
\i = Number of valid runs.
                                           78

-------
                  Table B13.  FDB420 - Class 6 - Diesel HDTC Individual Bag
                                   Gaseous Emission Rates
Emittant3
HC Bag-1
HC Bag-2
HC Bag-3
HC 3ag-4
Integrated HC
CO Bag-1
CO Bag-2
CO Bag-3
CO Bag-4
Integrated CO
NOx Bag-1
NOx Bag-2
NOx Bag-3
NOx Bag-4
Integrated NOx
MPG Bag-1
MPG Bag-2
MPG Bag-3
MPG Bag-4
Integrated MPG
Cold Start
10. 47 ± 1.33
6.67 ± 0.80
3.46 ± 0.11
8.03 ± 0.15
7.71 ± 0.87
21.95 ± 0.12
9.52 ± 0.45
5.22 i 0.20
8.67 ± 0.39
12.01 ± 1.08
19.17 ± 0.32
11.77 ± 0.44
9.62 ± 0.29
16.24 ± 0.30
14.07 ± 0.32
6.71 ± 0.22
10.35 ± 0.45
11.58 ± 0.21
9.28 ± 0.06
9.11 ± 0.16
Nb
3
3
3
3
4
3
3
4
4
4
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
4
Hot Start
6.97 ± 0.24
5.96 ± 0.34
3.25 ± 0.18
8.23 ± 0.23
5.99 ± 0.26
10.52 ± 0.40
6.98 ± 0.29
4.43 ± 0.24
7.86 ± 0.38
7.45 ± 0.46
17.91 ± 0.53
11.08 i 0.51
9.18 ± 0.58
16.43 ± 0.03
13.24 ± 0.72
8.26 ± 0.22
11.62 ± 0.41
12.24 ± 0.10
9.17 ± 0.21
10.33 ± 0.44
Nb
5
5
6
6
6
6
6
6
5
8
5
5
6
4
6
8
6
4
4
S
Weighted




6.24 ± 0.35




8.10 ± 0.55




13.36 ± 0.66




10.16 ± 0.40
Emittant results are expressed in terms of grams/mile except MPG,
which i' i xpressed in miles per gallon.
N = Number of valid runs.
                                          79

-------
                  Table 814.   CDW786B  -  Class  6  -  Diesel HDTC  Individual Bag
                                    Gaseous  Emission  Rates
Emittant9
HC Bag-1
HC Bag-2
HC Bag-3
HC Bag-4
Integrated HC
CO Bag-1
CO Bag-2
CO Bag-3
CO Bag-4
Integrated CO
NOx Bag-1
NOx Bag-2
KOx Bag-3
NOx Bag-4
Integrated NOx
MPG Bag-1
MPG Bag-2
MPG Bag-3
MPG Bag-4
Integrated MPG
Cold Start .
13.15 ± 1.20
5.27 ± 0.90
1.55 ± 0.06
5.68 * 0.05
6.45 ± 0.39
33.87 ± 1.58
11.33 ± 0.13
4.47 ± 0.45
10.52 ± 0.83
15.28 ± 1.17
12.21 r 0.40
8.39 ± 0.62
7.14 ± 0.31
10.91 ± 0.80
9.43 ± 0.64
6.52 ± 0.63
9.91 ± 0.52
10.79 ± 0.28
8.83 ± 0.51
8.72 ± 0.21
Nb
4
3
3
3
3
4
3
3
3
4
3
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
Hot Start
4.18 ± 0.28
3.39 ± 0.33
1.40 ± 0.16
5.40 ± 0.66
3.55 ± 0.24
13.07 ± 1.35
7.20 ± 0.62
3.80 ± 0.41
11.55 ± 0.84
8.97 ± 0.70
12.01 ± 1.14
8.14 ± 0.62
7.39 ± 0.25
11.99 ± 0.95
9.47 ± 0.15
8.13 ± 0.50
11.46 ± 0.87
11.09 ± 0.35
8.31 ± 0.47
9.61 ± 0.13
Nb
8
8
5
7
7
il
/
6
8
.8
8
8
6
8
6
8
8
8
8
8
Weighted




3.96 ± 0.26




9.87 ± 0.76




9.46 ± 0.22




9.48 ± 0.14
Emittant results are expressed in terms of grams/mile except MPG,
which is expressed in miles per gallon.
N = Number of valid runs.
                                          80

-------
                     APPENDIX C
Heavy-Duty Transient Cycle Individual Bag Particulate
      Emission Rates for Diesel-Powered Trucks

                  (Tables Cl - C8)
                       81

-------
                  Table Cl.  FDW112 - Class 2B - Diesel  HDTC Individual  Bag
                                 Participate Emission Rates
Emittant3
Part. Bag-1
Part. Bag-2
Part. Bag-3
Part. Bag-4
Integrated Total
Participate
% Extr. Bag-1
% Extr. Bag-2
% Extr. Bag-3
% Extr. Bag-4
Integrated CH-C1-
% Extr. * c
Part. Org. Bag-1
Part. Org. Bag-2
Part. Org. Bag-3
Part. Org. Bag-4
Integrated Parti-
culate Organics
Inc-rt Bag-1
Inert Bag-2
Inert B
e.
3
Hot Start
1.100 ± 0.147
1.027 ± 0.098
1.402 4 0.201
1.250 ± 0.344
1.204 ± 0.190
68.5 ± 4.8
81.2 ± 0.9
92.1 ± 2.2
58.6 4 1.5
86.6 4 7.4
0.758 i 0.143
0.835 ± 0.085
1.304 4 0.211
0.511 ± 0.047
1.049 t 0.224
0.311 4 0.032
0.193 4 0.015
0.099 4 0.012
0.374 ± 0.035
0.155 ± 0.077
Nb
4
4
4
4
12
4
4
5
3
12
4
4
4
2
12
3
4
4
2
12
Weighted




1.202 * 0.18




85.2 4 7.6




1.029 4 0.22C




0.173 t 0.077
Emittant results are expressed in terms of grams/mile except  % Extractable, which
is expressed in percent.
N = Number of valid runs.
                                          82

-------
                    Table C2.   CDR734  -  Class 28  - Diesel HDTC Individual Bag
                                   Participate  Emission Rates
Emittant3
Part. Bag-1
Part. Bag-2
Part. Bag-3
Part. Bag-4
Integrated Total
Particulate
" Extr. Bag-1
% Extr. Bag-2
% Extr. Bag-3
% Extr. Bag-4
Integrated CH?C1?
% Extr. c *-
Part. Org. Bag-1
Part. Org. Bag-2
Part. Org. Bag-3
Part. Org. Bag-4
Integrated Parti-
culate Organics
Inert Bag-1
Inert Bag-2
Inert Bag-3
Inert Bag-4
Integrated Inert
Material
Cold Start
0.806 ± 0.148
0.808 ± 0.517
0.338 ± 0.292
0.885 ± 0.189
0.709 ± 0.101

38.0 ± 20.0
44.2 ± 7.2
33.7 ± 7.4
27.4 ± 4.0
39.1 ± 4.2

0.25D ± 0.009
0.626 ± 0.007
0.027 ± 0.002
0.256 ± 0.036
0.278 ± 0.058

0.374 ± 0.031
0.682 ± 0.036
0.065 ± 0.001
0.724 ± 0.043
0.431 ± 0.057

Nb
4
4
4
4
4

4
4
3
4
4

2
2
2
3
4

2
2
2
3
4

Hot Start
0.531 ± 0.032
0.319 ± 0.061
0.319 ± 0.027
0.513 ± 0.055
0.432 ± 0.046

33.3 ± 5.3
36.5 ± 2.0
57.1 ± 3.1
32.9 t 14.3
39.4 t 5.0

0.153 ± 0.013
0.105 ± 0.006
0.187 ± 0.005
0.153 ± 0.022
0.174 t 0.035

0.353 ± 0.026
0.182 ± 0.010
0.127 ± 0.009
0.361 ± 0.030
0.262 ± 0.034

Nb
8
7
7
7
7

7
5
7
7
7

4
4
6
5
7

5
5
5
4
7

Weighted




0.472 ± 0.054





39.4 ± 4.9





0.189 ± 0.03S





0.286 ± 0.037

a Emittant results are expressed in terms of grams/mile  except  %  Extractable, which
  is expressed in percent.

b
  N = Number of valid runs.
                                            83

-------
                    Table C3.   FDP387 - Class 2B -  Diesel  HDTC  Individual Bag
                                   Particulate Emission  Rates
Emittant9
Part. Bag-1
Part. Bag-2
Part. Bag-3
Part. Bag-4
Integrated Total
Particulate
% Extr. Bag-1
% Extr. Bag-2
% Extr. Bag-3
% Extr. Bag-4
Integrated CH?C1-
% Extr. L L
Part. Org. Bag-1
Part. Org. Bag-2
Part. Org. Bag-3
Part. Org. Bag-4
Integrated Parti-
culate Organics
Inert B,-q-l
Inert Bag-2
Inert Bag-3
Inert Bag-4
Integrated Inert
Material
Cold Start
1.372 ± 0.034
0.407 ± 0.030
0.660 ± 0.023
0.474 ± 0.023
0.697 ± 0.053

54.9 ± 0.6
63.0 ± 3.0
71.6 ± 1.8
50.1 i 7.7
60.1 ± 5.7

0.750 t 0.020
0.259 ± 0.014
0.472 ± 0.020
0.265 ± 0.023
0.417 ± 0.02F

0.628 ± 0.018
0.153 t 0.025
0.188 ± 0.013
0.222 ± 0.011
0.280 ± 0.057

Nb
3
4
4
3
4

3
3
4
3
4

2
3
4
2
4

2
3
±
2
4

Hot Start
0.635 ± 0.056
0.392 i 0.026
0.629 ± 0.017
0.436 + 0.047
0.520 ± 0.012

63.5 ± 2.0
70.4 t 4.9
76.2 ± 2.3
65.4 ± 3.2
71.4 ± 5.4

0.419 ± 0.034
0.276 ± 0.033
0.481 ± 0.017
0.279 ± 0.027
0.371 ± 0.027

0.249 ± 0.004
0.115 ± C.015
0.151 ± 0.016
0.155 i 0.032
0.149 ± 0.029

Nb
6
7
7
6
7

4
6
6
5
7

3
6
6
4
7

3
6
6
4
7

Weighted




0.545 ± 0.018





69.8 ± 5.4





0.378 ± 0.027





0.168 ± 0.033

d Emittant results are expressed in terms of grams/mile  except  % Extractable, which
  is expressed in percent.

b
  N = Number of valid runs.
                                           84

-------
                    Table C4.   CBW786A  - Class 6  - Diesel HDTC Individual Bag
                                   Participate Emission Rates
Emittant3
Part. Bag-1
Part. Bag-2
Part. Bag-3
Part. Bag-4
Integrated Total
Particulate
S Extr. Bag-1
% Extr. Bag-2
% Extr. Bag-3
% Extr. Bag-4
Integrated CH-CU
% Extr. c
Part. Org. Bag-1
Part. Org. Bag-2
Part. Org. Bag-3
Part. Org. Bag-4
Integrated Parti-
culate Organics
Inert Bag-1
Inert Bag-2
Inert Bag-3
Inert Bag-4
Integrated Inert
Material
Cold Start
3.688 ± 0.511
2.046 ± 0.241
1.450 ± 0.429
1.636 ± 0.241
2.191 ± 0.287

75.2 ± 24.2
69.0 ± 4.3
35.4 ± 5.9
39.8 ± 6.7
54.8 ± 9.7

2.165 ± 0.662
1.420 ± 0.260
0.405 ± 0.032
0.640 ± 0.027
1.212 ± 0.336

1.228 ± 0.674
0.627 ± 0.020
0.935 ± 0.263
0.996 ± 0.263
0.979 ± 0.178
-•
Nb
3
3
3
3
3

3
3
3
3
3

2
3
2
3
3

2
3
3
3
3

Hot Start
2.008 ± 0.576
1.933 ± 1.062
1.226 ± 0.175
1.571 ± 0.246
1.627 ± 0.343

53.3 ± 8.8
68.7 ± 3.6
34.0 ± 2.6
40.3 ± 5.9
49.6 ± 8.9

0.846 ± 0.071
0.964 ± 0.109
0.416 ± 0.051
0.625 ± 0.083
0.758 ± 0.122

0.903 ± 0.106
0.443 ± 0.096
0.810 ± 0.139
0.945 ± 0.212
0.869 ± 0.221

rf-
4
4
3
4
4

4
3
4
4
5

3
3
3
4
4

4
3
3
4
4

Weighted




1.708 ± 0.335





50.3 t 9.0





0.823 ± 0.153





0.883 ± 0.215

a Emittant results are expressed in terms of grams/mile except % Extractable, which
  is expressed in percent.

b
  N = Number of valid runs.
85

-------
                  Table C5.  CDU780 - Class 6 - Diesel  HDTC Individual  Bag
                                 Participate Emission Rates
Emittant3
Part. Bag-1
Part. Bag-2
Part. Bag-3
Part. Bag-4
Integrated Total
Particulate
% Extr. Bag-1
% Extr. Bag-2
% Extr. Bag-3
% Extr. Bag-"-
Integrated CH9C1?
% Extr. c i
Part. Org. Bag-1
Part. Org. Bag-2
Part. Org. Bag-3
Part. Org. Bag-4
Integrated Parti-
culate Organics
Inert Bag-1
Inert Bag-2
Inert Bag-3
Inert Bag-4
Integrated Inert
Material
Cold Start
2.826 ± 0.246
1.931 ± 0.274
1.057 ± 0.119
1.721 ± 0.161
2.041 ± 0.263
54.1 ± 4.3
70.2 ± 1.1
46.1 ± 4.9
35.8 ± 3.4
48.5 ± 4.1
1.531 ± 0.212
1.35S ± 0.192
0.483 ± 0.027
0.609 ± 0.055
0.984 ± 0.092
1.295 ± 0.132
0.593 ± 0.110
0.574 ± 0.112
1.099 ± 0.168
1.057 ± 0.206
Nb
3
3
4
4
4
3
3
4
3
4
3
3
4
3
4
5
4
. 4
6
4
Hot Start
1..494 ± 0.121
1.360 ± 0.261
0.866 ± 0.043
1.448 ± 0.227
1.298 ± 0.122
49.8 ± 4.5
65.1 ± 1.7
36.2 ± 1.5
34.9 ± 2.7
45.4 ± 3.6
0.7^: ± 0.124
0.758 ± 0.092
0.325 ± 0.007
0.518 ± 0.048
0.588 ± 0.058
0.733 ± 0.013
0.406 ± 0.032
0.562 ± 0.025
0.977 + 0.171
0.710 ± 0.094
Nb
7
7
7
7
7
5
4
6
6
7
3
3
4
3
7
5
4
(,
6
7
Weighted




1.404 ± 0.142




45.8 : 3.7




0.646 ± 0.063




0.760 ± 0.110
Emittant results are expressed in terms  of grams/mile  except %  Extractable, which
is expressed in percent.

N = Number of valid runs.                 36

-------
                  Table  C6.   FCW161  - Class 6 - Diesel KUTC Individual Bag
                                 Particulate Emission Rates
Emittant3
Part. Bag-1
Part. Bag-2
Part. Bag-3
Part. Bag-4
Integrated Total
Particulate
% Extr. Bag-1
% Extr. Bag-2
% Extr. Bag-3
% Extr. Bag-4
Integrated CH~C1~
% Extr. L <•
Part. Org. Bag-1
Part. Org. Bag-2
Part. Org. Bag-3
Part.. Org. Bag-4
Integrated Parti-
culate Organics
Inert Bag-1
Inert Bag-2
Inert Bag-3
Inert Bag-4
Integrated Inert
Material
Cold Start
2.262 ± 0.112
0.919 4 0.184
0.849 ± 0.185
0.994 ± 0.049
1.253 ± 0.029

57.6 ± 13.0
68.5 ± 3.6
60.1 ± 9.0
25.9 ± 3.9
54.8 ± 6.7

1.128 ± 0.032
0.55 ± 0.030
0.527 ± 0.037
0.260 ± 0.045
0.687 ± 0.087

1.129 ± 0.125
0.312 ± 0.026
0.434 ± 0.063
0.742 ± 0.037
0.566 ± 0.085

Nb
4
4
4
4
4

4
4
4
3
4

3
3
4
3
4

3
4
3
3
3

Hot Start
0.858 ± 0.103
0.525 t 0.110
0.602 ± 0.105
0.767 ± 0.120
0.680 ± 0.072

48.3 ± 9.4
56.0 ± 4.2
46.4 i 6.1
31.1 ± 5.3
44.5 t 5.5

0.367 t 0.023
0.272 ± 0.03S
0.260 4 0.030
0.233 ± 0.036
0.306 ± 0.055

0.473 ± 0.036
0.236 ± 0.027
0.289 4 0.043
0.563 ± 0.021
0.374 4 0.053

Nb
7
7
8
8
8

7
7
7
8
8

3
6
5
7
7

5
5
6
5
7

Weighted




0.762 4 0.06f





46.0 4 5.7





0.360 4 0.059





0.401 ± 0.058

Emittant results are expressed in terms of grams/mile except % Extractable, which
is expressed in percent.
N - Number of valid runs.
                                          87

-------
                    Table C7.  FDB420 - Class 6 - Diesel HDTC Individual  Bag
                                   Participate Emission Rates
Emittant3
Part. Bag-1
Part. Bag-2
Part. Bag-3
Part. Bag-4
Integrated Total
Participate
% Extr. Bag-1
% Extr. Bag-2
% Extr. Bag-3
% Extr. Bag-4
Integrated CH?C1?
% Extr. c
Part. Org. Bag-1
Part. Org. Bag-2
Part. Org. Bag-3
Part. Org. Bag-4
Integrated Parti-
culate Organics
Inert Bag-1
Inert Bag-2
Inert Bag-3
Inert Bag-4
Integrated Inert
Material
Cold Start
4.796 ± 0.480
2.996 ± 0.561
1.729 ± 0.054
1.900 ± 0.141
3.105 ± 0.423

81.8 ± 2.6
88.4 ± 1.5
76.3 ± 2.4
73.1 ± 5.5
77.1 ± 5.8

3.735 ± 0.030
2.432 ± 0.307
1.321 ± 0.058
1.394 ± 0.198
2.388 ± 0.339

0.789 ± 0.164
0.317 ± 0.045
0.409 ± 0.044
0.506 ± 0.073
0.718 ± 0.239

Nb
3
4
3
3
4

3
3
3
3
4

2
3
3
3
4

2
3
3
3
4

Hot Start
2.647 ± 0.177
2.314 ± 0.141
1.400 ± 0.115
1.750 ± 0.138
2.070 ± 0.071

79.3 ± 1.1
86.9 ± 1.4
79.7 ± 1.6
71.3 ± 3.2
79.1 ± 3.0

2.061 ± 0.111
1.994 ± 0.126
1.085 ± 0.045
1.252 ± 0.131
1.588 ± 0.191

0.558 ± 0.024
0.313 ± 0.018
0.285 ± 0.046
0.499 ± 0.046
0.482 ± 0.142

Nb
7
8
7
8
8

6
7
7
6
8

5
7
5
6
8

4
6
7
6
8

Weighted




2.218 ± 0.121





78.8 ± 3.4





1.702 ± 0.212





0.516 ± 0.156

a Emittant results are expressed in terms of grams/mile except % Extractable,  which
  is expressed :ii percent.

b
  N = Number of valid runs.
                                            88

-------
                   Table C8.  CDW786B - Class 6 - Diesel HDTC Individual Bag
                                  Participate Emission Rates
Emittant3
Part. Bag-1
Part. Bag-2
Part. Bag-3
Part. Bag-4
Integrated Total
Particulate
% Extr. Bag-1
% Extr. Bag-2
% Extr. Bag-3
% Extr. Bag-4
Integrated CH9C1~
% Extr. * *
Part. Org. Bag-1
Part. Or-;;. Bag-2
Part. Org. Bag-3
Part. Org. Bag-4
Integrated Parti-
culate Organics
Inert Bag-1
Inert Bag-2
Inert Bag-3
Inert Bag-4
Integrated Inert
Material
Cold Start
6.315 ± 0.395
2.205 ± 0.280
1.431 ± 0.365
2.34C. ± 0.748
3.029 ± 0.226
70.8 ± 4.0
69.0 ± 9.5
36.6 ± 2.1
40.7 ± 6.8
54.3 ± 4.6
4.482 ± 0.520
1.525 ± 0.322
0.464 ± 0.065
1.027 ± 0.124
1.647 ± 0.220
1.834 ± 0.167
0.579 ± 0.097
0.789 ± 0.029
1.627 ± 0.517
1.382 ± 0.142
Nb
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
3
3
4
4
3
•3
3
a
Hot Start
1.787 ± 0.458
1.510 ± 0.177
1.251 ± 0.294
2.245 ± 0.336
1.730 ± 0.192
51.0 ± 6.7
66.1 ± 10.1
35.5 ± 5.9
34.7 ± 1.7
46.5 ± 7.6
0.38S ± 0.127
1.053 ± 0.152
0.390 ± 0.016
0.817 ± 0.124
0.802 ± 0.134
0.994 ± 0.079
0.543 ± 0.157
0.724 ± 0.146
1.550 ± 0.311
0.928 ± 0.195
Nb
4
4
4
4
4
4
3
3
3
4
3
3
3
3
4
3
3
3
3
4
Weighted




1.916 ± 0.197




47.6 ± jb.2
1L




0.923 ± 0.146




0.993 ± 0.187
  Emittant results are expressed in terms  of grams/mile  except  %  Extractable, which
  is expressed in percent.
b ..
    = Number of valid runs.
                                           QO

-------