Final Report
Source Testing for Semi-Volatile
Organic Compounds and NOx
Prepared for:
Mr. Paul Boys
Environmental Services Division
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10
1200 Sixth Avenue
Seattle, Washington 98101
October 28,1991
RADIAN
CORPORATION
-------
RADIAN
CORPORATION
9qo 017 010 00 10395 Old placerville Road
298-017-010-00 Sacramento, CA 95827
DCN: 91-298-017-010-01 (916)362-5332
SOURCE TESTING FOR SEMI-VOLATILE
ORGANIC COMPOUNDS AND NOX EMISSIONS AT
AMALGAMATED SUGAR'S NAMPA IDAHO FACILITY
FINAL REPORT
Prepared for:
Mr. Paul Boys
Environmental Services Division
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10
1200 Sixth Avenue
Seattle, Washington 98101
Prepared by:
Radian Corporation
10395 Old Placerville Road
Sacramento, California 95827
Contact: Larry Edwards
October 28, 1991
-------
CORPORATION
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section Page
1.0 INTRODUCTION 1-1
2.0 SUMMARY OF RESULTS 2-1
3.0 EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS 3-1
3.1 Sampling Procedures 3-2
3.2 Sampling Locations 3-3
3.3 Results of Semi-Volatiles Testing of the Pulp Dryer
Stack '3-3
3.4 Results of NOX Testing at the Pulp Dryer Stack 3-17
3.5 Results of Semi-Volatiles Testing of the First
Carbonation Unit Vent 3-17
3.6 Process Conditions During Sampling 3-24
4.0 DISCUSSION OF RESULTS 4-1
4.1 General Discussion 4-1
4.2 Quality Control/Quality Assurance Discussion 4-2
Idaho Sugar
-------
IORPORATIO
LIST OF TABLES
Table Page
2-1 Summary of Major Organic Compounds Found in Emissions From
Pump Dryers at Amalgamated Sugar's Nampa Idaho Facility,
February 5-6, 1991 2-2
3-1 Reduction of Raw Field Sampling Data for Semi-Volatiles
Sampling at Amalgamated Sugar's Nampa Idaho Facility 3-4
3-2 Semi-Volatile Results for Run #1, Pulp Dryer at Amalgamated
Sugar's Nampa Idaho Facility, February 5, 1991 3-5
3-3 Semi-Volatile Results for Run #2, Pulp Dryer at Amalgamated
Sugar's Nampa Idaho Facility, February 6, 1991 3-8
3-4 Semi-Volatile Results for Run #3, Pulp Dryer at Amalgamated
Sugar's Nampa Idaho Facility, February 6, 1991 3-11
3-5 Semi-Volatile Results for Blank Run, Pulp Dryer at Amalgamated
Sugar's Nampa Idaho Facility, February 5, 1991 3-14
3-6 Continuous Monitor NOX Results During Semi-Volatiles
Sampling at Amalgamated Sugar's Nampa Idaho Facility 3-18
3-7 Calibration of Continuous NOX During Semi-Volatiles
Sampling at Amalgamated Sugar's Nampa Idaho Facility 3-190
3-8 Semi-Volatile Results for Sample Collected at First
Carbonation Unit Stack at Amalgamated Sugar's Nampa
Idaho Facility, February 8, 1991 3-20
3-9 Process Conditions During Sampling at Amalgamated Sugar's
Nampa Idaho Facility, February 8, 1991 3-25
4-1 Results of Surrogate Recoveries for EPA method 8270 Anal 4-3
APPENDIX - Field Data Sheets
Idaho Sugar ii
-------
1.0 INTRODUCTION
The Idaho Air Quality Bureau (IAQB), Division of Environmental Quality, in
Boise Idaho, is concerned about the potential emissions of semi-volatile hydrocarbons from
sugar beet refineries. The main power boilers from these facilities have been well
characterized, but the emissions from secondary sources have not been extensively studied.
Mr. Robert Wilcosz of the IAQB applied to U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA),
under the state assistance program, for support of air emissions testing from two of the
suspect secondary point sources found at sugar beet refineries. The EPA award was made
to IAQB, and Mr. Paul Boys of EPA Region X in Seattle was assigned as the project officer.
Radian Corporation (Radian) was chosen to conduct the emissions testing
under an existing EPA contract to provide a variety of services to EPA. Dr. Larry Edwards
was identified as Radian's Project Director. After a Quality Assurance Project Plan was
written by Radian and approved by IAQB and EPA, the testing was carried out during the
first week in February, 1991, at the Amalgamated Sugar facility in Nampa, Idaho. The pulp
dryer stack was successfully tested for semi-volatile hydrocarbons by EPA Method 0010.1
The second source scheduled for testing was the first carbonation unit vent, but it was found
to be unsuitable for conventional testing because of water entrainment and condensation in
the flue gas stream. As a partial recourse, a sample of the entrained water mist was taken
and analyzed for semi-volatile organic compounds. Another testable emission source at the
facility could not be found, and the testing was concluded with three tests of the pulp dryer
flue gas stream and the entrained mist sample from the first carbonation unit.
Section 2 of this report presents a summary of the test results. Section 3 gives
all of the experimental results. Section 4 is devoted to a discussion of those results,
including a review of the quality assurance/quality control results.
kl.S. EPA, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, 1986, "Test Methods for Evaluating Solid
Waste," SW-846, Third Edition; Method 0010.
Idaho Sugar 1-1
-------
RADIAN
CORPORATION
2.0 SUMMARY OF RESULTS
The three EPA Method 0010 samples collected at the south pulp dryer were
analyzed by SW-846 Method 8270, a gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS)
procedure.1 Method 8270 specifies a list of nearly 100 compounds to be reported; in
addition, the ten largest peaks found on the spectrum but not included in the 8270 list are
also reported. A summary of all detected compounds is presented in Table 2-1. The
laboratory reports are included in the Appendix, and the complete results for all reported
compounds are given in Section 3.0.
The only 8270 semi-volatile listed compounds detected in the samples were
benzoic acid, p-cresol, phenol, and pyridine, and of these, pyridine was found in the largest
quantities (average concentration was about 1,500 jug/m3, or an emission rate of about O.H
Ibs/hr). Other non-8270 compounds were reported, some at substantially greater levels than
pyridine. The most prominent among these was an unidentified cyclic alkene found at an
average concentration of about 14,100 jug/w?, or an average emission rate of about 1.01
Ibs/hr. The blank sample showed that there was no major contamination problem. The
small blank values have not been subtracted from the other results (i.e., results have not
been blank corrected).
NOX levels measured in the pulp dryer stack during the sampling were fairly
constant and usually ranged between 100-150 ppm. There was one NOX excursion during
the first half of Run #2 where the concentration reached 300 ppm. The NOX concentrations
for each five minute period during sampling are given in Section 3.0
The exhaust stream in the first carbonation unit was saturated and consisted
of 65 percent water. In this environment, where condensation was occurring in the stack,
virtually all of the particulate matter would be enveloped in water droplets. A sample of
^bid, Methods 0010 and 8270.
Idaho Sugar 2-1
-------
TABLE 2-1. SUMMARY OF MAJOR ORGANIC COMPOUNDS FOUND IN EMISSIONS FROM PULP DRYERS AT
AMALGAMATED SUGAR'S NAMPA IDAHO FACILITY, FEBRUARY 5-6, 1991
Run #1
Run #2
Run #3
COMPOUNDS
Blank
(ug) (Ibs/hr) (ug) (Ibs/hr) (ug) (Ibs/hr) (ug)
Unknown cyclic alkene :
Furancarboxal dehyde
C2-Pyrazine
Cl-Pyrazine
Pyridine
C3-Pyrazine
Unknown carboxylic acid
C2-Pyrazine
Benzoic Acid
Benzal dehyde
Cl-Furancarboxal dehyde
Phenol
Hydroxy benzal dehyde
4-Methyl phenol (p-cresol)
Furan methanol
Hydroxy methoxy benzal dehyde
Di methyl sulf oxide
Unknown
Benzofuran
Unknown
Unknown hydrocarbon
Unknown hydrocarbon
Unknown
Unknown alcohol
30,000
11,000
7,600
5,900
4,400
3,000
2,900
2,100
1,600
1,600
1,400
1,300
810
610
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.782
0.287
0.198
0.154
0.115
0.078
0.076
0.055
0.042
0.042
0.037
0.034
0.021
0.016
38,000
8,400
7,000
5,600
4,100
710
570
1,900
ND
ND
2,500
1,300
ND
760
990
490
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1.008
0.223
0.186
0.149
0.109
0.019
0.015
0.050
0.066
0.034
0.020
0.026
0.013
47,000
11,000
7,200
5,200
3,700
1,100
ND
2,200
1,500
2,100
2,700
1,400
1,200
ND
820
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1.254
0.294
0.192
0.139
0.099
0.029
0.059
0.040
0.056
0.072
0.037
0.032
0.022
ND
67
ND
270
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND-
ND
ND
840
150
160
93
100
77
55
200
ND: Not Detected; See Tables in Section 3 for detection limits.
Idaho Sugar
2-2
-------
CORPORATI
the mist was taken and analyzed for semi-volatile compounds. No 8270 compounds were
found. Sixteen non-8270 compounds were reported and may be found at the end of
Table 3-8. Since the stream was too wet for an accurate flow rate determination using EPA
Method 2, only concentrations are reported. An estimate of the emission rate from this
source is given in Section 4.0.
Idaho Sugar 2-3
-------
CORPORATION
3.0 EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS
3.1 Sampling Procedures
The primary objective of the sampling at Amalgamated Sugar's Nampa Idaho
facility was to determine the emission rate of the semi-volatile organic compounds. This
class of compounds is generally defined as those compounds with boiling points of about
100ฐC or greater. The sampling method followed the protocol given in EPA Method 0010.
This procedure involved the isokinetic extraction of a sample of flue gas and paniculate
matter from the exhaust stack, filtration at 248ฐF, cooling and passage through an XAD-2
organic resin trap, and the collection of any condensate. All of the fractions were combined
and extracted with organic solvents according to the analytical procedure specified in EPA
Method 8270. This procedure was described in the Quality Assurance Project Plan for this
study, and there were no departures from that protocol.1
During the sampling, the NOX concentration in the stack being sampled was
continuously monitored with a TECO chemiluminescent NOX analyzer. The protocol for the
NOX extraction, delivery, conditioning and measurement systems was also given in the
Quality Assurance Project Plan. The reported concentrations represent averages over five-
minute intervals.
After examination of the first carbonation unit exhaust source, it was
determined by Radian personnel on site, with the concurrence of the Radian project
director, Mr. Paul Boys and Mr. Robert Wilcosz, that EPA Method 0010 sampling could not
be carried out at that location due to excessive water condensation in the stack. Therefore,
in an attempt to determine if there were any semi-volatile organic compounds being emitted
from this source, a sample of the flue gas and entrained water mist was collected non-
isokinetically from within the stack. The procedure involved extraction of a sample from
^Quality Assurance Project Plan for Sampling of Semi-Volatile Organic Species at Amalgamated Sugar's
Nampa, Idaho Facility," Prepared by Radian Corporation, February, 1991.
Idaho Sugar 3-1
-------
RADIAN
CORPORATION
the stack via a stainless steel probe, through a Teflonฎ delivery line, and directly into a
chilled impinger. 'There was no attempt to measure the stack velocity (the pitot tube
immediately filled with water) nor to extract the sample isokinetically. Both the extracted
flue gas and the entrained condensate were directed into a chilled impinger where any semi-
volatile compounds would effectively be captured. A one-hour sample was collected; the
gas volume was 22.00 dry standard cubic feet. At the end of the sampling period, the
sample probe' and delivery line were washed out, and that rinse solution was combined with
the aqueous solution in the chilled impinger. The volume of dry gas was metered
downstream of the impinger to determine total sample volume and to enable calculation of
concentrations.
3.2 Sampling Locations
There are three sets of stacks at the Amalgamated Sugar facility serving three
different pulp dryer units. The south stack was chosen to be sampled, primarily because it
was in constant and representative operation and because of good access for sampling. Two
ports were used for sampling to reach all of the 24 traverse points dictated by EPA Method
1. Pictures of the sampling location were given in the Quality Assurance Program Plan.
The exhaust from the first carbonation unit was also scheduled to be tested by
EPA Method 0010. However, because the stack contained nearly 65 percent moisture, it
was impossible to carry out isokinetic sampling in this source (the pitot tubes immediately
plugged). With condensation occurring in the stack, virtually all of the particulate matter
would have been enveloped in water droplets. By sampling the entrained mist and flue gas,
all of the semi-volatile compounds in the stream are effectively captured. This procedure
proved adequate to characterize the emissions of semi-volatile organic compounds from the
first carbonation unit. The sampling method and apparatus were describe in Section 3.1.
In an attempt to utilize resources already assembled at the site (i.e., Method
0010 capability), other potential emission points were investigated. Of the other point
Idaho Sugar 3-2
-------
CORPORATION
sources at the facility, only the other pulp dryer stacks were viable candidates for sampling.
A preliminary test determined that both of these sources exhibited cyclonic flow, and often
severe cyclonic flow (exceeding 20ฐ at most points and occasionally exceeding 30ฐ). The
cyclonic flow was also not steady in time. Therefore, the locations were determined to be
unacceptable for Method 5 type sampling. Since no other suitable sampling points could
be found, the testing effort was concluded.
3.3 Results of Semi-Volatiles Testing of the Pulp Dryer Stack
Three similar tests were carried out on the south pulp dryer stack. The
reduced field sampling data and the calculated percent isokinetics, moisture, flue gas
velocity, and volumetric stack flow rate are reported in Table 3-1. All of the runs were
within one percent of being 100 percent isokinetic. The moisture fraction averaged over 40
percent. It should be noted that the numbering of the samples was inadvertently switched
after sampling. The following correlations were established:
Chain-of-Custody Analytical
Run Number Sampling Number Number Number
Run#l AS-01 AS-01 AS-01
Blank Sample AS-02 AS-04 AS-04
Run #2 AS-03 AS-02 AS-02
Run #3 AS-04 AS-03 AS-03
The complete results for each run are given in Tables 3-2 through 3-4. The
analytical results for the blank sample are given in Table 3-5. Since there was no sample
volume associated with the blank sample, only the detected masses are given. Blank values,
where compounds were detected at all, were relatively small, and none of the other results
have been corrected for the blank values. Where Method 8270 compounds were not
detected (ND), no calculation of the concentration or emission rate was carried out.
Detection limits for each compound in each sample are reported in the tables.
Idaho Sugar - 3-3
-------
CORPORATION
Table 3-1. Reduction of Raw Field Sampling Data for Semi-Volatiles
Sampling at Amalgamated Sugar's Nampa Idaho Facility
Run Number
Date
Time of Sample Collection
Range of Stack Temp (F)
DGMCF i
Dry Gas Meter Volume i
PTCF
Impinger Weight Gain
Percent Oxygen
Perent Carbon Dioxide
Pressure at Meter
Pressure in Stack
Temp at Meter
Temp in Stack
Nozzle Diameter
Total Sampling Time
Avg Sq Root of Delta P
Standard Temp
Standard Pressure
Diameter of Stack
Volume of Gas Sampled
Moisture Fraction
Gas Molecular Weight
Stack Velocity
Percent Isokinetic
Volumetric Stack Flow
cu. ft.
grams
% 02
% C02
, " Hg
L " H20
i deg F
[ deg F
inches
minutes
[ P*l/2
[ deg F
; " Hg
[ feet
[ dscf
i % H20
Ig/mole
(ft/sec
% iso
dscfm
}-
i-
=
) =
i=
!-
l =
l-
1=
l-
1=
1 =
Run #1
2-5-91
1315-1634
168-173
1.0017
81.327
0.84
1122.6
13.0
6.0
27.60
-0.05
66.5
170.0
0.396
192.0
0.242
68.0
29.92
6.448
75.363
41.24%
24.746
16.692
100.9%
14,856
Run n
2-6-91
0906-1242
165-175
1.0017
82.712
0.84
1246.4
13.0
6.0
27.61
-0.05
59.0
170.0
0.396
192.0
0.261
68.0
29.92
6.448
77.782
43.02%
24.541
18.074
99.1%
15,603
Run #3
2-6-91
1353-1726
163-182
1.0017
81.105
0.84
1083.9
13.0
6.0
27.61
-0.05
55.5
167.0
0.394
192.0
0.247
68.0
29.92
6.448
76.788
39.94%
24.895
16.942
99.6%
15,490
Idaho Sugar
3-4
-------
CORPORATIOI
Table 3-2. .Semi-Volatile Results for Run #1, Pulp Dryer at Amalgamated
Sugar's Nampa Idaho Facility, February 5, 1991
Run Number: #1
Sample Number: AS-01 (field number); AS-01 (laboratory number)
Volume of Sample: 75.36 dscf
Volumetric Flow Rate in Stack: 14,856 dscfm
Compounds
Acenaphthene
Acenaphthylene
Acetophenone
4-Aminobiphenyl
Aniline
Anthracene
Benzidine
Benzo(a) anthracene
Benzofajpyrene
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
Benzo (g , h , i ) peryl ene
Benzo (k)fluoranthene
Benzoic acid
Benzyl alcohol
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether
Butyl benzyl phthal ate
4-Chloro-3-methyl phenol
p-Chloroaniline
bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane
bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether
bi s(2-Chl oroi sopropyl )ether
1-Chloronaphthalene
2-Chloronaphthalene
2-Chlorophenol
4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether
Chrysene
Di -n-octyl phthal ate
Dibenz(a,h) anthracene
Dibenz(a,j)acridine
Dibenzofuran
Di butyl phthal ate
1 , 2-Di chl orobenzene
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Di chl orobenzene
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine
2,4-Dichlorophenol
2,6-Dichlorophenol
Detection
Limit
(ug)
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
2,500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
1,000
500
500
Concen-
Mass tration
(ug) (ug/m3)
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1,600 * 601
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Emission
Rate
(Ibs/hr)
~ ~
0.0417
(continued )
Idaho Sugar
3-5
-------
CORPORATION
Table 3-2 (continued). Results for Run #1,
Compounds
Di ethyl phthal ate
p-Dimethylaminoazobenzene
7,12-Dimethylbenz(a)anthra
DI methyl phenethyl ami ne
2, 4-Dimethyl phenol
Dimethyl phthal ate
4, 6-D1nitro-2-methyl phenol
2,4-Dinitrophenol
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
Diphenylamine
1 , 2-Diphenyl hydrazi ne
Ethyl methanesulfonate
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
Hexachl orobenzene
Hexachlorobutadiene
Hexachl orocycl opentadl ene
Hexachl oroethane
Indeno (1,2, 3 -cd) pyrene
Isophorone
Methyl methanesulfonate
3-Methyl chol anthrene
2-Methyl naphthal ene
2-Methyl phenol (o-cresol )
4-Methyl phenol (p-cresol )
N-Nitroso-di-n-butylamine
N-Nltrosodimethylamine
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
N-Ni trosodi propyl ami ne
N-Nitrosopi peri dine
Naphthalene
1-Naphthylamine
2-Naphthylamine
2-Nitroaniline
3-Nitroaniline
4-Nitroaniline
Nitrobenzene
2-Nitrophenol
4-Nitrophenol
Pentachl orobenzene
Detection
Limit
(ug)
500
500
1,200
500
500
500
2,500
2,500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
2,500
2,500
2,500
500
500
2,500
500
Concen- Emission
Mass tration Rate
(ug) (ug/m3) (mg/sec)
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND . ---
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
610 229 0.0159
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
(continued )
Idaho Sugar
3-6
-------
CORPORATION
Table 3-2 (continued). Results for Run #1.
Compounds
Pentachloronitrobenzene
Pentachlorophenol
Phenacetin
Phenanthrene
Phenol
2-Picoline
Pronamide
Pyrene
Pyridine
1,2,4, 5-Tetrachl orobenzene
2,3,4, 6-Tetrachl orophenol
1 , 2 , 4-Tri chl orobenzene
2 , 4 , 5-Tri chl orophenol
2, 4, 6-Tri chl orophenol
Detection
Limit
(ug)
500
2,500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
1,000
500
500
500
Mass
(ug)
NO
NO
NO
ND
1,300
NO
ND
ND
4,400
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Concen-
tration
(ug/m3)
488
1,652
Emission
Rate
(mg/sec)
0.0339
0.1147
Tentatively Identified Compounds**
Unknown cyclic
Furancarboxaldehyde
C2-Pyrazine***
Cl-Pyrazine
C3-Pyrazine
Unknown carboxylic
C2-Pyrazine***
Benzaldehyde
Cl-Furancarboxaldehyde
Hydroxy benzaldehyde
*: Detected at a level below detection limit (the detection limit is
defined as 3.3 times the background noise level).
**: Ten largest peaks not included in 8270 list of analytes.
***: Two different isomers of C2-Pyrazine were detected at
different retention times; therefore, they are reported separately.
ND = Not Detected
kene
de
c acid
ehyde
yde
30,000
11,000
7,600
5,900
3,000
2,900
2,100
1,600
1,400
810
11,265
4,131
2,854
2,216
1,127
1,089
789
601
526
304
0.7822
0.2868
0.1982
0.1538
0.0782
0.0756
0.0548
0.0417
0.0365
0.0211
Idaho Sugar
3-7
-------
CORPORATIOI
Table 3-3. "Semi-Volatile Results for Run #2, Pulp Dryer at Amalgamated
Sugar's Nampa Idaho Facility, February 6, 1991
Run Number: #2
Sample Number: AS-03 (field number); AS-02 (laboratory number)
Volume of Sample: 77.78 dscf
Volumetric Flow Rate in Stack: 15,603 dscfm
Compounds
Acenaphthene
Acenaphthylene
Acetophenone
4-Aminobiphenyl
Aniline
Anthracene
Benzidine
Benzof a) anthracene
Benzo(a)pyrene
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
Benzo(g , h , i ) peryl ene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Benzoic acid
Benzyl alcohol
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether
Butyl benzyl phthal ate
4-Chloro-3-methyl phenol
p-Chloroaniline
bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane
bis(2-Chloroethyl Jether
bi s(2-Ch1 oroi sopropyl )ether
1-Chloronaphthalene
2-Chloronaphthalene
2-Chlorophenol
4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether
Chrysene
Di -n-octyl phthal ate
Dibenz(a,h) anthracene
Dibenz(a,j)acridine
Dibenzofuran
Di butyl phthal ate
1 , 2-Di chl orobenzene
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine
2,4-Dichlorophenol
2,6-Dichlorophenol
Detection
Limit
(ug)
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
5,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
2,000
1,000
1,000
Concen-
Mass tration
(ug) (ug/m3)
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Emission
Rate
(Ibs/hr)
(continued )
Idaho Sugar
3-8
-------
CORPORATION
Table 3-3 (Continued). Results for Run #2.
Compounds
Di ethyl phthal ate
p-Dimethyl aminoazobenzene
7,12-Dimethylbenz(a)anthra
Di methyl phenethyl ami ne
2,4-Dimethylphenol
Dimethyl phthal ate
4, 6-Dinitro-2-methyl phenol
2,4-Dinitrophenol
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
Diphenylamine
1,2-Diphenylhydrazine
Ethyl methanesulfonate
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
Hexachlorobenzene
Hexachlorobutadiene
Hexachl orocycl opentadi ene
Hexachloroethane
Indeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene
Isophorone
Methyl methanesulfonate
3-Methyl chol anthrene
2-Methyl naphthalene
2-Methyl phenol (o-cresol )
4-Methyl phenol (p-cresol )
N-Nitroso-di-n-butylamine
N-Nitrosodimethylamine
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
N-Nitrosodipropylamine
N-Nitrosopiperidine
Naphthalene
1-Naphthylamine
2-Naphthylamine
2-Nitroaniline
3-Nitroaniline
4-Nitroaniline
Nitrobenzene
2-Nitrophenol
4-Nitrophenol
Pentachl orobenzene
Detection
Limit
(ug)
1,000
1,000
2,500
1,000
1,000
1,000
5,000
5,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
5,000
5,000
5,000
1,000
1,000
5,000
1,000
Concen-
Mass tration
(ug) (ug/m3)
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
760 * 277
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Emission
Rate
(Ibs/hr)
" T
0.0202
(continued )
Idaho Sugar
3-9
-------
Table 3-3 (Continued). Results for Run #2.
Detection
Compounds Limit
(ug)
Pentachloronitrobenzene
Pentachlorophenol
Phenacetin
Phenanthrene
Phenol
2-Picoline
Pronamide
Pyrene
Pyridine
1,2,4, 5-Tetrachl orobenzene
2,3,4, 6-Tetrachl orophenol
1,2, 4-Tri chl orobenzene
2,4, 5-Tri chl orophenol
2,4, 6-TH chl orophenol
Tentatively Identified Compounds
Unknown cyclic alkene
Furancarboxal dehyde
C2-Pyrazine***
Cl-Pyrazine
Cl - Furancarboxal dehyde
C2-Pyrazine***
Furan methanol
C3-Pyrazine
Unknown carboxylic acid
Hydroxy methoxy benzal dehyde
1,000
5,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
2,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
**
Mass
(ug)
ND
ND
ND
ND
1,300
ND
ND
ND
4,100
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
38,000
8,400
7,000
5,600
2,500
1,900
990
710
570
490
Concen-
tration
(ug/m3)
473
1,492
13,826
3,056
2,547
2,038
910
691
360
258
207
178
Emission
Rate
(Ibs/hr)
_ _ _
0.0345
0.1088
1.0083
0.2229
0.1857
0.1486
0.0663
0.0504
0.0263
0.0188
0.0151
0.0130
*: Detected at a level below detection limit (the detection limit
is defined as 3.3 times the background noise level).
**: Ten largest peaks not included in 8270 list of analytes.
***:Two different isomers of C2-Pyrazine were detected at different
retention times; therefore, they are reported separately.
ND = Not Detected
Idaho Sugar
3-10
-------
CORPORATIOI
Table 3-4. "Semi-Volatile Results for Run #3, Pulp Dryer at Amalgamated
Sugar's Nampa Idaho Facility, February 6, 1991.
Run Number: #3
Sample Number: AS-04 (field number); AS-03 (laboratory number)
Volume of Sample: 76.79 dscf
Volumetric Flow Rate in Stack: 15,490 dscfm
Compounds
Acenaphthene
Acenaphthylene
Acetophenone
4-Aminobiphenyl
Aniline
Anthracene
Benzidine
Benzp (a) anthracene
Benzo(a)pyrene
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
Benzo (g , h , i ) peryl ene
Benzo ( k) f 1 uoranthene
Benzoic acid
Benzyl alcohol
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether
Butyl benzyl phthal ate
4-Chl oro-3-methyl phenol
p-Chloroaniline
bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane
bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether
bis(2-Chloroisopropyl)ether
1-Chloronaphthalene
2-Chl oronaphthal ene
2-Chlorophenol
4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether
Chrysene
Di-n-octyl phthal ate
Dibenzf a, h) anthracene
Dibenz(a,j)acridine
Dibenzofuran
Di butyl phthal ate
1 , 2-Di chl orobenzene
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1 , 4-Di chl orobenzene
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine
2,4-Dichlorophenol
2,6-Dichlorophenol
Detection
Limit
(ug)
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
2,500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
1,000
500
500
Concen- Emission
Mass tration Rate
(ug) (ug/m3) (Ibs/hr)
NO
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1,500 * 553 0.0400
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
(continued )
Idaho Sugar
3-11
-------
! P O R A T I O I
Table 3-4 (continued). Results for Run #3,
Compounds
p-Dimethyl aminoazobenzene
7,12-Dimethylbenz(a)anthra
Dimethyl phenethyl ami ne
2,4-Dimethylphenol
Dimethyl phthal ate
4, 6-Dinitro-2-methyl phenol
2,4-Dinitrophenol
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
Diphenylamine
1 , 2-Di phenyl hydrazi ne
Ethyl methanesulfonate
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
Hexachlorobenzene
Hexachl orobutadi ene
Hexachl orocycl opentadi ene
Hexachl oroethane
Indeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene
Isophorone
Methyl methanesulfonate
3 -Methyl chol anthrene
2-Methyl naphthal ene
2-Methyl phenol (o-cresol )
4-Methyl phenol (p-cresol )
N-Nitroso-di-n-butylamine
N-Nitrosodimethylamine
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
N-Nitrosodipropylamine
N-Nitrosopiperidine
Naphthalene
1-Naphthylamine
2-Naphthylamine
2-Nitroaniline
3-Nitroaniline
4-Nitroaniline
Nitrobenzene
2-Nitrophenol
4-Nitrophenol
Pentachl orobenzene
Detection
Limit
(ug)
500
1,200
500
500
500
2,500
2,500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
2,500
2,500
2,500
500
500
2,500
500
Concen- Emission
Mass tration Rate
(ug) (ug/m3) (Ibs/hr)
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND --- --- .
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
(continued ....)
Idaho Sugar
3-12
-------
CORPORATION
Table 3-4 (continued). Results for Run #3.
Compounds
Pentachloronitrobenzene
Pentachlorophenol
Phenacetin
Phenanthrene
Phenol
2-Picoline
Pronamide
Pyrene
Pyridine
1,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene
2,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
2,4,5-Tri chlorophenol
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
Detection
Limit
(ug)
500
2,500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
1,000
500
500
500
Mass
(ug)
ND
ND
ND
ND
1,400
ND
ND
ND
3,700
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Concen-
tration
(ug/m3)
_ _ _
516
1,364
Emission
Rate
(Ibs/hr)
0.0374
0.0987
Tentatively Identified Compounds**
Unknown cyclic alkene
Furancarboxal dehyde
C2-Pyrazine***
Cl-Pyrazine
Cl - Furancarboxal dehyde
C2-Pyrazine***
Benzal dehyde
Hydroxy Benzal dehyde
C3-Pyrazine
Furan methanol
47,000
11,000
7,200
5,200
2,700
2,200
2,100
1,200
1,100
820
17,321
4,054
2,653
1,916
995
811
774
442
405
302
1.2541
0.2935
0.1921
0.1387
0.0720
0.0587
0.0560
0.0320
0.0294
0.0219
**
Detected at level below detection limit (the detection limit is
defined as 3.3 times the background noise level).
Ten largest peaks not inlcuded in 8270 list of analytes.
***:Two different isomers of C2-Pyrazine were detected at different
retention times; therefore, they are reported separately.
ND - Not Detected
Idaho Sugar
3-13
-------
CORPORATION
Table 3-5. Semi-Volatile Results for Blank Run, Pulp Dryer at
"Amalgamated Sugar's Nampa Idaho Facility, February 5, 1991
Run Number: Blank
Sample Number: AS-02 (field number); AS-04 (laboratory number)
Detection
Compounds Limit
(ug)
Acenaphthene
Acenaphthylene
Acetophenone
4-Aminobiphenyl
Aniline
Anthracene
Benzidine
Benzo(a) anthracene
Benzo(a)pyrene
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Benzoic acid
Benzyl alcohol
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether
Butyl benzyl phthal ate
4-Chl oro-3-methyl phenol
p-Chloroaniline
bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane
bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether
bis(2-Chloroisopropyl)ether
1-Chloronaphthalene
2-Chloronaphthalene
2-Chlorophenol
4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether
Chrysene
Di -n-octyl phthal ate
Dibenz(a,h) anthracene
Dibenz(a,j)acridine
Dibenzofuran
Di butyl phthal ate
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine
2,4-Dichlorophenol
2,6-Dichlorophenol
150
150
150
150
150
150
150
150
150
150
150
150
750
150
150
150
150
150
150
150
150
150
150
150
150
150
150
150
150
150
150
150
150
150
300
150
150
Concen- Emission
Mass tration Rate
(ug) (ug/m3) (Ibs/hr)
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND ---
ND
ND
NO
ND
NO
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NO
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
(continued )
Idaho Sugar
3-14
-------
CORPORATIOI
Table 3-5 (continued). Results for Blank Run.
Detection
Compounds Limit
(ug)
Di ethyl phthal ate
p-Dimethyl ami noazobenzene
7,12-Dimethylbenz(a)anthracene
Di methyl phenethy 1 ami ne
2, 4-Dimethyl phenol
Dimethyl phthal ate
4, 6-Dinitro-2-methyl phenol
2,4-Dinitrophenol
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
Diphenylamine
1 , 2-Di phenyl hydrazi ne
Ethyl methanesulfonate
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
Hexachlorobenzene
Hexachl orobutadi ene
Hexachl orocycl opentadi ene
Hexachl oroethane
Indeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene
Isophorone
Methyl methanesulfonate
3-Methyl chol anthrene
2-Methyl naphthalene
2-Methyl phenol (o-cresol )
4-Methyl phenol (p-cresol )
N-N,itroso-di -n-butyl amine
N-Nitrosodimethyl amine
N-Nitrosodi phenyl amine
N-Nitrosodipropyl amine
N-Nitrosopiperidine
Naphthalene
1-Naphthyl amine
2-Naphthyl amine
2-Nitroaniline
3-Nitroaniline
4-Nitroaniline
Nitrobenzene
2-Nitrophenol
4-Nitrophenol
Pentachl orobenzene
150
150
380
150
150
150
750
750
150
150
150
150
150
150
150
150
150
150
150
150
150
150
150
150
150
150
150
150
150
150
150
150
150
150
150
750
750
750
150
150
750
150
Concen-
Mass tration
(ug) (ug/m3)
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Emission
Rate
(Ibs/hr)
(continued )
Idaho Sugar
3-15
-------
CORPORATION
Table 3-5 (continued). Results for Blank Run.
[
Compounds
Pentachloronitrobenzene
Pentachlorophenol
Phenacetin
Phenanthrene
Phenol
2-Picoline
Pronamide
Pyrene
Pyridine
1,2,4 , 5-Tetrachl orobenzene
2,3,4, 6-Tetrachl orophenol
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
2,4, 5-Tri chl orophenol
2, 4, 6-Trichl orophenol
Jetection
Limit
(ug)
150
750
150
150
150
150
150
150
150
150
300
150
150
150
Tentatively Identified Compounds*
Dimethylsulfoxide
Cl-Pyrazine
Unknown alcohol
Benzofuran
Unknown
Unknown hydrocarbon
Unknown
Unknown hydrocarbon
Furancarboxaldehyde
Unknown
Mass
(ug)
ND
NO
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Concen-
tration
(ug/m3)
_ - .
Emission
Rate
(Ibs/hr)
...
840
270
200
160
150
100
93
77
67
55
*: Ten largest peaks not included in 8270 list of analytes.
ND = Not Detected
Note: No Concentrations or Emission Rates are calculated since there
is no volume associated with the blank sample.
Idaho Sugar
3-16
-------
In the list of tentatively identified compounds (i.e., non-8270 compounds), the
ten largest peaks have been reported. In some cases, the peak could not be unambiguously
identified among the 44,000 compounds in the mass spectroscopic library. However,
frequently some information on the compound was developed and has been included in the
tables (e.g., unknown cyclic alkene). The most prominent compound detected, the unknown
cyclic alkene, has a molecular weight of about 92, probably has the formula C7H8, and is
probably cycloheptatriene.
Copies of the original field data sheets, calibration documentation and
laboratory analytical reports are given in the Appendix.
3.4 Results of NO^ Testing at the Pulp Dryer Stack
The five minute averages for NOX concentrations are given in Table 3-6. They
have been broken into columns which correspond with each run number. The instrument
calibration information is given in Table 3-7. The calibration data indicate that, for the
scale being used and the concentrations encountered, all of the values are accurate to better
than 5 percent.
Radian retains the original strip chart data from which the five-minute
averages were derived, and they are not reproduced in the Appendix.
3.5 Results of Semi-Volatiles Testing of the First Carbonation Unit Vent
The results of the analysis of the aqueous catch associated with the sampling
at the first carbonation unit vent is reported in Table 3-8. The sampling method was
described in Section 3.1. No EPA Method 8270 compounds were identified, but 16 peaks
were seen above the instrument detection limit and identified where possible. The sample
volume and moisture calculation are included on the field data sheet (see Appendix) and
were:
Idaho Sugar 3-17
-------
CORPORATIOI
Sample Volume: 22.0 dscf
Moisture Content: 64.6%
Stack Temperature: 188ฐF
Since the pitot tube would plug almost immediately with condensing water, no flow rate was
determined in the stack and no emission rate could be calculated. Therefore, results are
given only as mass detected (wg) and concentration (ag/m3).
Copies of the original field data sheets, laboratory analytical reports, and
chain-of-custody reports are given in the Appendix.
Idaho Sugar 3-18
-------
I A T I O I
Table 3-6. Continuous Monitor NOx Results during Semi-Volatiles
Sampling at Amalgamated Sugar's Nampa Idaho Facility
Run #1 (2-5-91) Run #2 (2-6-91) Run #3 (2-6-91)
Time
(hhmm)
1240
1245
1250
1255
1300
1305
1310
1315
1320
1325
1330
1335
1340
1345
1350
1355
1400
1405
1410
1415
1420
1425
1430
1435
1440
1445
1450
1455
pause
1530
1535
1540
1545
1550
1555
1600
1605
1610
1615
1620
1625
1630
1635
Cone.
(ppm)
145
135
142
135
150
145
132
137
153
168
145
138
123
128
125
135
140
133
138
135
130
138
133
135
133
128
128
128
143
140
135
130
120
113
118
130
140
125
110
120
115
133
Time
(hhmm)
905
910
915
920
925
930
935
940
945
950
955
1000
1005
1010
1015
1020
1025
1030
1150
1155
1200
1205
1210
1215
1220
1225
1230
1235
1240
1245
1250
1255
1300
Cone.
(ppm)
162
178
190
195
193
188
250
270
300
290
290
290
295
300
310
270
270
195
110
130
126
87
66
66
100
115
110
125
128
150
100
118
105
Time
(hhmm)
1355
1400
1405
1410
1415
1420
1425
1430
1435
1440
1445
1450
1455
1500
1505
1510
1515
1520
1525
1530
1600
1605
1610
1615
1620
1625
1630
1635
1640
1645
1650
1655
1700
1705
1710
1715
1720
1725
1730
Cone.
(ppm)
113
153
148
135
135
130
140
145
138
133
137
130
132
140 .
135
134
133
133
135
143
133
135
148
145
133
129
129
138
140
148
145
133
130
130
143
160
178
210
188
Idaho Sugar 3-19
-------
CORPORATIOI
Table 3-7- Calibration of Continuous NOx Monitor
during Semi-Volatiles Sampling at
Amalgamated Sugar's Nampa Idaho Facility
February 5, 1991
Approx.
Time
(hhmm)
1200
1500
1640
Standard
(ppm)
10
10
50
50
200
365
50
200
365
50
200
365
Instrument
(ppm)
10
10 *
50
49 *
200 *
335 *
50
200
380
48
200
330
Scale
(ppm)
0-100
0-250
0-100
0-250
0-250
0-1000
0-250
0-250
0-1000
0-250
0-250
0-1000
% Difference
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.0%
0.0%
8.2%
0.0%
0.0%
4.1%
4.0%
0.0%
9.6%
Approx.
Time
(hhmm)
800
1100
1305
1735
February 6, 1991
Standard
(ppm)
10
50
200
365
200
365
50
200
365
50
200
Instrument
(ppm)
12.5
49
200
365
Scale
(ppm)
0-250
0-250
0-250
0-1000
% Difference
25.0%
2.5%
0.0%
0.0%
200 *
365 *
50 *
200
365
50
200
0-250
0-1000
0-250
0-250
0-1000
0-250
0-250
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Represents the average to two measurements.
Idaho Sugar
3-20
-------
CORPORATION
Table 3-8. Semi-Volatile Results for Sample Collected at
First Carbonation Unit Stack at Amalgamated
Sugar's Nampa Idaho Facility, February 8, 1991
Compound
Detection
Limit
(ug)
Acenaphthene 10
Acenaphthylene 10
Acetophenone 10
4-Aminobiphenyl 10
Aniline 10
Anthracene 10
Benzidine 10
Benzo(a)anthracene 10
Benzofajpyrene 10
Benzo(b)fluoranthene 10
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 10
Benzo(k)fluoranthene 10
Benzoic acid 50
Benzyl alcohol 10
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether 10
Butyl benzylphthalate 10
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol 10
p-Chloroaniline 10
bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane 10
bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether 10
bis(2-Chloroisopropyl)ether 10
1-Chloronaphthalene 10
2-Chloronaphthalene 10
2-Chlorophenol 10
4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether 10
Chrysene 10
Di-n-octylphthalate 10
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 10
Dibenz(a,j)acridine 10
Dibenzofuran 10
Dibutylphthalate 10
1,2-Dichlorobenzene 10
1,3-Dichlorobenzene 10
1,4-Dichlorobenzene 10
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine 20
2,4-Dichlorophenol 10
2,6-Dichlorophenol 10
Mass
Detected
(ug)
Concen-
tration
(ug/m3)
(continued )
Idaho Sugar
3-21
-------
CORPORATIOI
Table 3-8 (continued). Results of First Carbonation Unit.
Compound
Detection
Limit
(ug)
Diethylphthalate 10
p-Dimethylaminoazobenzene 10
7>12-Dimethylbenz(a)anthra 25
Dimethylphenethylamine 10
2,4-Dimethylphenol 10
Dimethylphthalate 10
4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol 50
2,4-Dinitrophenol 50
2,4-Dinitrotoluene 10
2,6-Dinitrotoluene 10
Diphenylamine 10
1,2-Diphenylhydrazine 10
Ethyl methanesulfonate 10
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate 10
Fluoranthene 10
Fluorene 10
Hexachlorobenzene 10
Hexachlorobutadiene 10
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 10
Hexachloroethane 10
Indeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene 10
Isophorone 10
Methyl methanesulfonate 10
3-Methylcholanthrene 10
2-Methylnaphthalene 10
2-Methylphenol(o-cresol) 10
4-Methylphenol(p-cresol) 10
N-Nitroso-di-n-butylamine 10
N-Nitrosodimethylamine 10
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine 10
N-Nitrosodipropylamine 10
N-Nitrosopiperidine 10
Naphthalene 10
1-Naphthylamine 10
2-Naphthylamine 10
2-Nitroanil1ne 50
3-Nitroaniline 50
4-Nitroaniline 50
Nitrobenzene 10
2-Nitrophenol 10
4-Nitrophenol 50
Pentachlorobenzene 10
Mass
Detected
(ug)
Concen-
tration
(ug/m3)
(continued )
Idaho Sugar
3-22
-------
CORPORATION
Table 3-8 (continued). Results of First Carbonation Unit.
Compound
Detection
Limit
(ug)
Pentachloronitrobenzene 10
Pentachlorophenol 50
Phenacetin 10
Phenanthrene 10
Phenol 10
2-Picoline 10
Pronamide 10
Pyrene 10
Pyridine 10
1,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene 10
2,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol 20
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 10
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol 10
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol 10
Tentatively Identified Compounds*
C2-Pyrazine
C3-Pyrazine
Unknown hydrocarbon
Unknown hydrocarbon
Unknown alcohol
Cl-Pyrazine
C4-Pyrazine
C3-Oxazoline
Benzaldehyde
C4-Pyrazine
Terphenyl-dl4
Nitrobenzene-d5
2-Fluorobiphenyl
2-Fluorophenol
2,4,6-Tribromophenol
Phenol-d5
Mass
Detected
(ug)
1800
1500
990
480
460
410
370
220
150
100
100
92
87
64
60
52
Concen-
tration
(ug/m3)
1399
1166
770
373
358
319
288
171
117
78
78
72
68
50
47
40
*Largest peaks not included in 8270 list of analytes.
ND = Not Detcted
Note: Sample volume: 22.00 dscf.
Note: Moisture content: 64.6% @ 188 F.
Note: Emission Rate not determined because stack too wet to
measure in-stack velocity with pitot tube.
Idaho Sugar
3-23
-------
IORPORATIOI
3.6 Process Conditions During Sampling
During the sampling at the south pulp dryer stacks (Runs #1, #2 and #3),
amalgamated sugar operators maintained operational data as requested by Radian, EPA and
Idaho Air Quality Bureau (IAQB). Mr. Robert Wilcosz of the IAQB oversaw the collection
of these data, obtained and validated them, and supplied them to Radian for inclusion in
this report. They are presented in Table 3-9.
Idaho Sugar 3-24
-------
Table 3-9. Process Conditions During Sampling at Amalgamated Sugar's Nampa
Idaho Facility
Avg.
Avg.
Avg.
Avg.
Run Number
Date
Time of Sample Collection
Pulp Feed Rate to S. Dryer
Coal Feed Rate to S. Dryer
S. Dryer Box Temperature
S. Dryer Pulp Discharge
Temperature
(tons/hr)
(Ib/hr)
(deg F)
(deg F)
Run #1
2-5-91
1315-1634
59.2
5,676*
1,950
254
Run #2
2-5-91
0906-1242
55.2
4,414
1,950
259
Run #3
2-6-91
1353-1726
55.7
6,914
1,940
258
* Based on coal totalizer information from 1630-1645.
Note: These data were collected by Amalgamated Sugar and
provided to Radian through Idaho AQB (Robert Wilcosz).
Idaho Sugar 3-25
-------
CORPORATIOI
4.0 DISCUSSION OF RESULTS
4.1 General Discussion
The objective of this sampling program was to measure the emission rate of
semi-volatile organic compounds from the pulp dryer and first carbonation unit. The results
from the pulp dryer are reported in the tables in Sections 2.0 and 3.0. The emission rate
from the first carbonation unit could not be measured accurately, but the approximate
concentration of semi-volatile organic compounds in the very wet vent stack were given in
Table 3-8. The emission rate may be estimated by assigning a flow rate to the first
carbonation vent stack. While the exact flow rate was impossible to determine (due to
water and a surging-type flow pattern), a very rough estimate may be made -- perhaps 1,000
dry standard cubic feet per minute, based on a cross-sectional area of about 1 ft2, an actual
flow of about 40 ft/sec, and an approximate moisture correction (>50%). In any case,
pyrazines appear to be the major semi-volatile species in this source, and the overall
emissions amount to no more than a few grams (< 100) per hour.
The NOX concentration appeared to be rather consistent and remain usually
in the 100-150 ppmv range. There was one excursion to 300 ppmv, and concentrations
consistently higher than the 100-150 range were reported for one 90 minute period during
the first half of Run #2. These higher NOX values appeared to have no diminutive effect
on the semi-volatile concentrations, which, for most compounds, were about the same during
all three runs. In general, the NOX concentration results serve to validate the reported semi-
volatile compound emission results.
The process data indicate that the south pulp dryer unit was operating
normally during the test period, and that the results reported in this study should be
representative of semi-volatile emissions from the pulp dryer and first carbonation unit.
Idaho Sugar 4-1
-------
CORPORATION
4.2 Quality Control/Quality Assurance Discussion
The data quality objectives for the sampling carried out in this project were
given in the Quality Assurance Project Plan. Since reference methods were used for the
semi-volatile organic compound sampling, the accuracy and precision of the results are
defined by the method (ฑ50% and ฑ40%, respectively). The precision criterion appears
to have been met. For example, the precision (defined as the standard deviation of the
mean) of the three measurements of the two EPA Method 8270 compounds detected in all
three samples were as follows:
Pyridine: Standard Deviation of the Mean = 8.4%
Phenol: Standard Deviation of the Mean = 4.7%
Where compounds were reported in only one or two samples, the standard deviation of the
mean was, of course, much larger and usually exceeded the 40 percent criterion. Where
compounds were detected in all three samples, the 40 percent precision objective was always
met.
The accuracy specified by the method is assumed to be achieved if the
sampling protocol is followed. Therefore, one may assume that the average for any reported
compound is accurate to within ฑ50 percent of the value reported. The accuracy of the
analyses may be assessed from the percent recovery of the method spike. Those results are
given in Table 4-1. The percent recovery for the surrogate compounds all met data quality
objectives except for the phenols. The phenols are traditionally difficult compounds to
analyze since they behave poorly on the GC columns and sometimes are lost altogether (as
was the case in this study where 0 percent recoveries are reported). Recognizing the poor
chromatographability of these compounds, the acceptable recovery ranges are:
Idaho Sugar 4-2
-------
CORPORATIOI
TABLE 4-1. Results of Surrogate Recoveries for EPA Method 8270 Analyses
Laboratory Analytical Number
Compounds
2-Fluorobiphenyl
2-Fluorophenol
N1trobenzene-d5
Phenol -d5
Terphenyl-dl4
2,4, 6-Tri bromophenol
V.UII tl U 1
Limits
(%)
30-115
25-121
23-120
24-113
18-137
19-122
As-01
(%)
96
76
108
0
118
81
As-02
(%)
102
72
96
Q 90
120
0
As-03
(%)
90
51
81
91
125
Q 93
As-04
(%)
87
13
107
7
61
0
As-05
(%)
87
Q 64
92
Q 52
100
Q 60
Note: Q represents data outside of control limits.
Note: Sample AS-05 was water condensate from the first carbonation unit.
Idaho Sugar 4-3
-------
CORPORATIOI
2-Fluorobiphenyl 21-100%
Phenol-d5 10-94%
2,4,6-Tribromophenol 10-123%
Still, some of these results fall outside of these broad ranges, indicating that the
performance of the analytical system during these analyses was inconsistent and uncertain
with respect to phenols. Therefore, the reported results of the phenolic compounds may be
low; in any case the results for any phenolic compound should be used cautiously and
considered to be an estimate of the true concentrations.
Otherwise, the percent recoveries indicate that the method was in control and
the reported results generally met the data quality objectives set out in the Quality
Assurance Project Plan.
The detection limit of each compound in each sample has been given in the
tables so the reader will have some feel for how far the reported value was above the
detection limit or, where nothing was detected, the sensitivity of the method. The detection
limits for the top ten tentatively identified peaks is generally not known since they were not
included on the list of standards. However, the detection limit for these compounds is
usually similar to that reported for similar Method 8270 compounds.
The data capture for all samples taken was 100 percent (i.e., no samples were
lost or invalidated).
Idaho Sugar 4-4
-------
APPENDIX
-------
Field Data Sheets
-------
SAMPLING LOCATION DIAGRAMS
cr
SAMPLWQ LOCATION
DUCT OMENSIONS
NEAREST UPSTREAM DISTURBANCE
NEAREST DOWNSTREAM DISTURBANCE
SDtVtW
r
CROSS-SECTIONAL VEW
-------
RADIAN
CORPORATION
PRELIMINARY VELOCITY TRAVERSE
1
1
1
1
(
1
/
V
1
91 IHT ฃr#~l>L<^ >^j-
MTF ?"7"^
OCATION /H<<~t f*^rc&>r**.
STACK ID. "72-"
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE, in. H|
STACK GAUGE PRESSURE, in. H,0
)PERATORS,^2$>
X
TRAVERSE
POINT
NUMBER
A-n
il
1ฐ
^
2
7
&
\ T
\ ^
k 3
) I
/ 1
V,
AVERAGE
<# 1 1
.1 1-
/ /&
_,
STACK
TEMPERATURE
(Ts), ซF
/^ f i
/ 70 ,
/7^ ^
/ ? & +
/ -7 / *
f 7/ /
/?/ -
772. "
/7Z, '
/ 71 -
/ 7/ -
/ 7/ -
PA(Duf)233 r-^j A ~) <-ff
4/72 ]ฃr/f<"~ -"' <-*7l
^^^
J
1. 2 ^
-
-rf2ฃ
SCHEMATIC OF TRAVERSE POINT LAYOUT
TRAVERSE
POINT
NUMBER
/ฃ fL
//
/v
'
y
1
I
/
/-$- -? *.
I-C ? *r*
7- 11 -?
% -?/z
*
AVERAGE
VELOCITY
HEAD
(Ap,), in.H20
II
,11
JO
//
. ฃ7f
Of
O.oo
0ป0
-------
EPA METHOD 1
TRAVERSE POINT LOCATION FOR CIRCULAR DUCTS
SAMPLING LOCATION
INSIDE OF FAR WALL TO
OUTSIDE OF NIPPLE. (DISTANCE A) _
INSIDE OF NEAR 1ALL TO
OUTSIDE OF NIPPLE. (DISTANCE B) -
STACK I JO., (DISTANCE A DISTANCE I).
NEAREST UPSTREAM DISTURBANCE
NEAREST DOWNSTREAM DISTURBANCE _
CALCULATOR
i
SCHEMATIC OF SAMPLING LOCATKNl
,'f"
TRAVERSE
POINT
NUMBER
/o
FRACTION
OF STACK 1.0.
//, r
gfr.Ji.
93.^
HACKLE.
PRODUCT OF
COUMINS2AM)1
(TO NEAREST 11 INCH)
DISTANCE B
TRAVERSE POINT LOCATION
FROM OUTSIDE OF NIPPLE
_^ฃv
EPA (Ow) 232
-------
EPA METHOD 1
TRAVERSE POINT LOCATION FOR CIRCULAR DUCTS
HAMT ฃ^*t~4ป^J^yj^^
SAMPLING LOCATION
INSIDE OF FAR WALL TO
OUTSIDE OF NIPPLE. (DISTANCE A)
INSIDE OF NEAR I ALL TO
OUTSIDE OF NIPPLE.
STACK U>., (DISTANCE I
NEAREST UPSTREAM DISTURBANCE SO '
NEAREST DOWNSTREAM DISTURBANCE.
CALCULATOR
_,-,
II
?0
^^t-
6>W-^
7?.o
?I-5
?rปv
^3>-"i
^7. c
STACK LC.
72.
J
1f
PVOOUCTOF
COUMS2AN03
(TO REAKEST 1,1 INCH)
/.^/
V-^2-
^5-^
/2--7V
/y.O
iC-W3
^6,-BT
S4-0
S^^b
63-S
fc>72-
^0.3
DISTANCE B
G.^
q-sz.
t^.r
n.iH
13.0
^o,cป
SUH
s^-o
G^f.3
u^.s
72-3-
7S-3
TRAVERSE FOUtT LOCATKM
FROM OUTSIDE OF NIPPLE
(SUMOFCOLUMSBttS)
-
EPA(Dw)Z32
vn
-------
RADIAN
CORPORATION
MODIFIED METHOD 5 DATA
PI*"
DAIE -2.
&"?/
SAMPLING 1 OCA 1 1 OH
SAMPLE TYPE
mm NUMBER
OPERATOR
PROBE LENGTH AND TYPE
10. .2>JC
A S-
/
AMBIENT TEMPERATURE
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE 2. 7, & O
STATIC PRESSURE (P$) ^ .o
FILTER NUMBER (s)
MINIMUM SAMPLE VOLUME
ASSUMED MOISTURE. X
SAMPLE BOH NUMBER _
METER BOX NUMBER
MITER A H* _ /.
C FACTOR
/
C _ - O 2.
PROBE HEATER SETTING
HEATER BON SEMIHC _
REFERENCE Ap
INITIAL LEAK CHECK O.&i 7
DRV/GAS METER FACTOR (V) /,
flNAL LEAK CHECK
SCHEMATIC OF TRAVERSE POINT LAYOUT
READ AND RECORD ALL DATA EVERY tj MINUTES
-------
-------
HI*.
Clack
IfcM
fM-kr
Ctock)
Walwtty
<**.).
Iซ.*H,0
Stack
X
Ortrie*
i*N. In. N.01
nine* AcUMl
HIUr
Ski* Out
(Clrcl*
tclrx
NaUr
Mkซ*rkซ
-------
RADIAN
Tlซ>
MOISTURE RECOVERY FORM FOR METHODS 4, 5, 6
Plant
Date
Sampling Location
Sample Type
Run Number
Sample Box Number
Clean-up Person
Solvent Rinses
Sample Identification Code
XAD Trap Number
ft0*4k~,<*4j*&<*y~^
2. - r - ?/
A^4>ฃ^y^t Sc~t^
/ซ^/M ฃ~
& /
L
J&-
"t^S/^+ffr
yM*-ฃ
Impinger
Number
Impinger
Solution
Amount of
Solution
(g)
Impinger Tip
Configuration
Impinger Weight (g)
Final
Initial
Weight
Gain
1
6f
o
ฃ79
6
TOTAL WEIGHT GAIN (g)
-------
RADIAN
CORPORATION
MODIFIED METHOD 5 DATA
SAMPLING LOCATION^
SAMPLE TYPE
RUN NUMBER
OPERATOR
AMBIENT _
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE _
STATIC PRESSURE (Pf)
FILTER NUMBER (s) *
MINIMUM SAMPLE VOLUME
INITIAL LEAK CHECK
PROBE IENCIH AMD TYPE
HHHE ID.
ASSUMED MOISTURE.
SAMPLE BOH NUMBER
METER BOX NUMBER
METER A HP
C f ACIOR
PROBE HEATER SETTING
HEATER BON SETTING _
REFERENCE ftp
DRV/GAS METER FACTOR (V)
FINAL LEAK CHECK
SCHEMATIC OF TRAVERSE POINT LAYOUT
READ AMD RECORD ALL DATA EVERY MINUTES
traverse
PoinL
Nuaber
Swpllng
Tine
Nln.
Cl*ch
llM
(M-lir
Clock)
Cat NeUr
Reading
(V.). flป
-
Velocity
Head
(^.).
In. *HtO
Stack
,:ซ,
Orifice
Pre*sure
Differential
(AH. In. H.OJ
Desired
Actual
Tcm
Prove
Filter
Skin
Out
ซraturc 'F/*C (Circle One)
Retire.
Mater
Absorbent
Trap
Dry Gas Meter
Inlet
laplnger
Eซlt
PU.I
Vacuw
In. Hซ
COMMENTS
-------
MOISTURE RECOVERY FORM FOR METHODS 4, 5, 6
Plant
Date
Sampling Location
Sample Type
Run Number
Sample Box Number
Clean-up Person
Solvent Rinses
Sample Identification Code
XAD Trap Number
->'
-2.
Impinger
Number
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Impinger
Solution
MT
HiO
H7o
s* r
Sฃ
Amount of
Solution
(g)
i-/ ฃJt>
-^/ffV
-
^ Ji?ฃ>
Impinger Tip
Configuration
*0
*r&S
/V&$
S*6f
/y* $
Impinger Weight (g)
Final
Initial
iM\.0
to*.\
^U.l
L/V7.I
92^2-
Weight
Gain
TOTAL WEIGHT GAIN (g)
-------
CORPORATION
MODIFIED METHOD 5 DATA
OM( *- (,<7-9 / f .
SAMPLING LOCATION SL^k ViL fa^ (^.f jJU
CAMDI I Ivor i/vi Ln*. T*' y I
316
SAMPLE TYPE
RUN NUMBER
OPERATOR
AS ~ O 3
AMBIENT TEMPERATURE _
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE _
STATIC PRESSURE (P^)
FILTER NUMBER (s) *
MINIMUM SAMPLE VOLUME
if. ซ /
..'- ^'"'
PROBE IINCIH AND TYPE
mini 10
ASSUMED MOISTURE. *_
SAMPLE BOX NUMBER _
METER BOX NUMBER
METER A Hป
C FACTOR
1L}L
5/^6-
S"/?6 0J-
/O
X^
PROBE HEATER SETTING
HEATER BOX SETTING _
REFERENCE Ap
INITIAL LEAK CHECK O. O /
,, /i*;**^ ,QH
SCHEMATIC OF TRAVERSE POINT LAYOUT
READ AND RECORD ALL DATA EVERY ^ MINUTES
DRV/GAS METER FACTOR (V)
FINAL LEAK CHECK
/ - OO 1 7
1 ravers*
Point
Nwfcer
Swpllng
Tlw
Mln.
J-O
^o
Cl*ck
MM
<ซ-hr
Cl*ck)
09/0
tool.
Cซ* MtUr
Rcซ4lnซ
Itl'l
/3T7.C3
Si,*!
Velocity
H**)
(AP.),
In. *H,0
,07
,06
tfiZ
Stack
jjs:
Z20.
Orifice
Pressure
Olfferentfal
(AN. In. H.O)
Desired Actual
,5V
Probe
Teaperature *F/*C (Circle One)
Filter
Skin Out
t
S2.
SLi
Retire.
Water
Absorbent
Trap
IV
Dry Gis Hcter
Inlet
5-7
6 3-
Outlet
-lH
5-0
jsa
51
VI
5-3
loplnger
Exit
^s3_
Y/
In. Hซ
"
11
"
3'-
r-
'? \
i>
COMMENTS
V
Kc<,
.^1
-------
toll*
flM
HI*.
CUck
CIcck)
CM NMซr
In.
.).
Stack
lN**f
Oririn
mwwitui
-JIM. In. H.Q)
Actual
Skin Out
rnur
MaUr
(Clrc
fait
/ป'Q
lQlฑ
1L
1L
i
i
lo
76
.10
/o
7
Ib
-30
II
"
/67
0-50
I
/e'W
5-7
5-7
n=.
ฃ2.
11
Lk ck
o-o
**inuA
~T~
/ /f>
JZ.^ฃ_
uฑh
>ft*/ttl
mo
!ฃL
HO
to V
^2
r
///v
^fi.
6
^^
r/
01
50
//3o
^JO
5V
TV
//3^
,0-r
/7V
/SU
66
i
T
66
7
-22
7
60
(gO
2 5^
.70
it-
fc
.04,
50
AS-03
1=
-------
Car,).
i. *ซ
SIM*
Orlfic*
PrซปปMfซ
IffcrMtUI
iซN. In. N.01
ActlMl
fHUr
Shin| Out
Mcclrc
Water
CCIrcU
Mwrtanl
ปrซT
^W * IteftAV
JTป Wปป ^Bป8Jg_
InUt
tRl
In. Hrf
Oi
^b
OL
ซ
^L
j^
iiZ.
Iff
^L
5-150
Jtt.
-7
^^^4ซ^ ^g.
n^
/>- 0.4
AO1T\
* vฃ*
'^J> "*' .
/f.r-03
-------
MOISTURE RECOVERY FORM FOR METHODS 4, 5, 6
PI ANT fft~>ป '^i PERSON ^/
SOLVENT RWSES '** />"*- <
SAMPLE DENTFICAT1ON COQE
XAf5 TRAP NLJLBFR
7 Sป_
O
L r^ r^uA)
> ^ ;
'/2_
&FNGER
NUMBER
MP1NGER
SOLUTION
AMOUNT OF
SOLUTION
(g)
MPt4QERTF
CONFIGURATION
M>NGER WEIGHT (grams)
FMAL
NTIAL
WEK3HT
GAN
Ko
1
576,
3
loo
i
r
<>.(*.
7
TOTAL WEIGHT QAM (grains)
-------
CORPORATION
MODIFIED METHOD 5 DATA
OAIE 1-ฃ-7/ .
SAMPLING LOCAIION g. fvt.f Jtfrie^
SAMPLE TYPE
RIM NUMBER
OPERATOR
AMBIENT TtNPERAlURE
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE
STATIC PRESSURE (P^) _^
MITER MffJER (s)
MINIMUM SAMPLE VOLUME
PROBE LfNGIH AND 1YPE g (rLA
KOIKE 1.0. ฃ
ASSUMED MOISIURE. X
SAMPLE BOX NUMBER 2ป
MEIER BOX NUMBER
MEIER A HP J
fc FACTOR
PROBE HEAIER SEHING I
MEAIER BOX SC11ING Z
REFERENCE Ap ______
AS-of
INITIAL LEAK CHECK/?^?g)g OUf)
DRV/CAS MEFEU fACIOR (IT)
FINAL LEAK CHECK
SCHEMATIC OF TRAVERSE POINT LAYOUT
READ AND RECORD ALL DATA EVERY Y MINUTES
In l!-i
.-^
3
3
1
3
3
3l
1.
3-"
COHMENIS
-------
-TCP. Sft-PeV^
-------
HIM.
(74-fcr
Click)
Nvtor
ซ-
In.
Pr*ปtwrซ
OlffarvHtUI
M.OI
Actual
(Shin I Out
MKlrc
ci
InUt
In.
3-7
J5i
/ 71
i-V
176
S'2.
Vo
-01
II
/
IV*
712
I.I
Co
ft.
/?!*>
I/O
/,ฃ>
(o G
Ibf
00%
>ปปfe,
2.7.
i-ป0-^A
AS-o?
-------
MOISTURE RECOVERY FORM FOR METHODS 4,5, 6
PLANT n ปซ->ซ. let c. xv,~ fซc/
OAT ** ~ o ~ ' '
RIMMMWn /45 ~O^
SAMR INO 1 OCATION /H I b
r
SAK/PLNG TYPE XM KV^
SAKPLWQBOX NUMBER ^-^
CLEAN-UP PERSON
SOLVENT RINSES
SAMPLE DENTFICATION CODE
YAD TRAP NUMBER A
OC. Q fj^
Q
fa <,r (5o--hU ^
5~"
kFMQER
MA6ER
KPINGER
SOLUTION
AMXJNTOF
SOLUTION
(g)
MPMQERTP
CONFIGURATION
M>NQER WEJQKT (yams)
FMAL
NTIAL
WEJGHT
GAM
z
6
< 7
6
&r*&*
ftovWon3/90
TOTAL WBQHT QAJN (grams)
-------
RADIAN
CORPORATION
MODIFIED METHOD 5 DATA
PROSE IENCIH AND 1VPE
MUIII ID
SAMPIING tOCAIION
SAMPLE WE
RIM NUMMR
OPERAIOR
ASSUMED NOISIUDE. X
SปปIE Ml NIMIIH
MMER MR HUMKM
HE IE* A I* /
C fACIM
BAROMEIRIC PRESSURE
SIM 1C PRESSURE
Illim NUMBER (ป)
fllOBI HEซUR StIIIHC
HEAIER Ml SE11ING
EYEHENCE
MINIMUM SAMPLE VOLUME
INITIAL LEAK
DRV/GAS MEIER fACIOR (V)
FINAL LEAK CHFCIt
SCHEMA1IC OF 1MVERSE POINI LAVOUI
MAO AND RECORD All DA1A EVERY _ / ฃ? MINUHS
COfNNIS
/ ^ > V3L<{ A'i- V ^2'ซ'
pscp^ ^,^^^-5^
- ^a^oo DiXF
-------
MOISTURE RECOVERY FORM FOR METHODS 4, 5, 6
PLANT.
JU
DATE -
RUN NUMBER f\ * ~ *> 5
SAMPUNQ LOCATION / ^
SAMPLNG TYPE. ^ " '
CLEAN-UP PERSON.
SOLVENT RNSES-
*** *-
: DENTFCAT1ON CODE-
XAD TRAP NUMSER
Af~&
M=t*3ER
MJvBER
1
I
3
MtNGER
SOLUTION
sV)7~
&/*r
$6
AMOUNT OF
SOLUTION
(0)
0_ J'lC^O
KPMGERTF
OONJHQURAT10N
KO
S">trS
ASfrj
MPNQER WEJQHT (grams)
RNAL
V^,6
77f.^
/^.ซf
NT1AL
VVJ.o
V?/.t
g"/?./
s~
fr
WHQHT
QAN
*ฐftb
W**
5f,i
.^3-f
TOTAL WEIGHT QAM (grams)
<&'
-------
Analytical Laboratory Reports
-------
COHPOMJiTIOI
Radian Work Order 91-02-094
Analytical Report
03/21/91
Amalgamated Sugar
Radian
10395 Old Placerville Road
Sacramento, CA 95827
Larry Edwards
Customer Work Identification Amalgamated Sugar
Purchase Order Number 298-017-09-03
Contents:
1 Analytical Data Summary
2 Sample History
3 Comments Summary
4 Notes and Definitions
Radian Analytical Services
8501 Mo-Pac Boulevard
P. 0. Box 201088
Austin, TX 78720-1088
512/454-4797
Client Services Coordinator: SKMERTENS
Certified by:
-------
Amalgamated Su0ar
Radian Work Order: 91-02-0941!
Analytical Data Summary
Page: 2
Method:SU8270-Sซni-Volatiles (1)
List:Hatrix Spike List
Sample ID:
Factor:
Results in:
Matrix:
AS-MX MS
X recvry
25A
MM5
Acenaphthene
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol
2-Chlorophenol
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
N-Mitrosodipropylamine
4-Nitrophenol
Pentachlorophenol
Phenol
Pyrene
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
Surrogate Recovery(X)
2-Fluorobiphenyl
Control Limits: 30 to 115
2-Fluorophenol
Control Limits: 25 to 121
Nitrobenzene-oS
Control Limits: 23 to 120
Phenol-d5
Control Limits: 24 to 113
Terphenyl-d14
Control Limits: 18 to 137
2,4,6-Tribromophenol
Control Limits: 19 to 122
Result Det. Limit
57
81
93
76
71
71
41
NC
90
113
72
77
78
79
80
109
66
NC Not calculated
(1) For a detailed description of flags and technical terms in this report refer to Appendix A in this report.
(2) 4-Methylphenol co-elutes with 3-methylphenol. The
value reported is the combined total of the 2
compounds.
-------
iBPOItATION
Amalgamated Sugar
Radian Work Order:
91-02-09*
Analytical Data Summary
Page: 3
Method:SU8270-Seปi-Volat1tes (1)
List:Table 1 Analytes
Sample 10: AS-1R.1I.1XJ- AS-2R.2I,2X,2- AS-3R,3I,3X,3- AS-4R,4I,4X,4F
F.1C F,2C F.3C
Factor: 50 50 100 15
Results in: ug ug ug ug
06A 12A 18A 23A
Matrix: MM5 MM5 MH5 HM5
Acenaphthene
Acenaphthylene
Acetophenone
4-Aminobiphenyl
Aniline
Anthracene
Benzidine
Benzo(a)anthracene
Benzo(a)pyrene
8enzo(b)f luoranthene
Benzo(g,h, i )perylene
Benzo( k) f I uoranthene
Benzoic acid
Benzyl alcohol
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether
Butylbenzylphthalate
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol
p-Chloroaniline
bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane
bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether
bis(2-Chloroisopropyl )ether
1-Chloronaphthalene
2-Chloronaphthalene
2-Chlorophenol
4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether
Chrysene
Di-n-octylphthalate
D i benz ( a , h ) anth racene
Dibenz(a,j)acridine
Dibenzofuran
(See next page for ter
Result Det. Limit
ND 500
NO 50ft
NO 500
NO 500
NO 590
NO 500
ND 500
ND 900
ND 500
ND SOft
ND 506
ND $00
1600 J 2500
ND 506
ND 500
NO 500
ND 500
ND 506
ND 500
ND $00
ND 590
ND 500
ND 500
ND 900
ND 500
ND SOft
ND 500
ND 900
ND 500
ND SOft
natively identified con
Result Det. Limit
ND 500
ND 500
ND 500
NO 500
ND 500
NO 500
NO 500
NO $00
ND 500
ND $00
ND 500 :
ND 900
ND 2500
ND 500
ND 500
ND 500
ND 500
ND 500
ND 500
ND 500
ND 500
ND 500
ND 500
ND 500
ND 500
ND 500
NO 500
NO 500
ND 500
ND 500
ipounds.)
Result Det. Limit
ND 1008
ND 1000
ND 1000
NO 1000
ND 1000
ND 1000
ND 1900
ND 1000
ND 1000
ND 1000
ND 1000
ND {000
1500 J 500&
ND 1000
NO 1000
NO 3000
ND 1000
ND 1000
ND 1000
ND JOftO
ND 1000
NO 1000
NO 1000
ND 1000
ND 1000
ND 1000
ND 1000
ND 1000
ND 1000
ND 1000
Result Det. Limit
ND m :Z
ND tffc ~
ND ISO
ND tt$
ND t5O
ND m
NO 15&
ND t*>
ND ISO
ND W
ND t5O
ND tSO
ND 750
ND t90
ND t50
ND tS4
ND ISO
ND 190
ND 150
NO tSO
ND ISO
ND t50
ND 150
NO 154
ND ISO
NO 190
ND ISO
ND tSO
ND W
ND VSto
NO Not detected at specified detection limit J Detected at less than detection limit
(1) For a detailed description of flags and technical terms in this report refer to Appendix A in this report.
(2) 4-Methylphenol co-elutes with 3 -methyl phenol. The
value reported is the combined total of the 2
compounds.
-------
RADIAN
CORPORATION
Amalgamated Sugar
Radian Work Order: 91-02-094
Analytical Data Summary
Page: 4
Method:SU8270-Semi-VolatUes (1)
List:Table 1 Anatytes
S*nPle IDs AS-1R,1I,1X,1- AS-2R,2t,2X,2- AS-3R,3I,3X,3- AS-4R,4I,4X,4F
MC F,2C F.3C
Factor: 50 50 100 15
Results in: "fl ug ug ug
06A 12A 18A 23A
Hatrix: MM5 HM5 MM5 HM5
Dibutylphthalate
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
1 ,3-Dichlorobenzene
1 , 4-D i eh I orobenzene
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine
2,4-Dichlorophenol
2,6-Dichlorophenol
Oiethylphthalate
p-D imethy I ami noazobenzene
7,12-0iniethylbenz(a)anthracene
Dimethylphenethylamine
2,4-Dimethylphenol
Dimethylphthalate
4,6-Oinitro-2-methylphenol
2,4-Dinitrophenol
2,4-Oinitrotoluene
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
Diphenylamine
1,2-Diphenylhydrazine
Ethyl methanesulfonate
bis(2-Ethylhexyl )phthalate
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
Hexach I orobenzene
Hexach I orobutadi ene
Hexach I orocyc I opentadi ene
Hexach I oroethane
Indenod ,2,3-cd)pyrene
Isophorone
Methyl methanesulfonate
_ (See next page for ter
Result Det. Limit
NO 506
NO 500
NO 586
NO 500
ND 1900
NO 500
ND 508
ND 500
ND 500
ND 1200
ND 508
ND 500
ND SOB
ND 2900
ND 2500
ND 500
ND 590
ND 500
ND 506
ND 500
ND 500
ND 506
ND 508
ND 500
ND 590
ND 500
ND 500
NO 500
ND 590
ND 500
natively identified con
Result Det. Limit
ND 500
ND $04
ND 500
NO 900
ND 1090
ND 500
ND 500
ND 900
ND 500
NO t200
ND 500
ND 900
ND 500
ND 2500
ND 2506
ND 900
ND 500
ND $00
ND 500
ND 900
ND 509
NO 500
ND 500
ND 900
ND 500
ND $00
NO 500
NO 900
ND 500
NO 500
pounds.)
Result Det. Limit
ND 1000
ND 1000
ND 1900
ND 1000
ND 2009
ND 1000
ND 1000
ND 1000
ND 1009
ND 2500
ND 1000
ND 1000
ND 1000
ND 5000
ND 5000
NO 1000
ND 1000
ND 1000
ND 1900
ND 1000
ND 1009
ND 1000
ND 1900
ND 1000
ND 1000
ND 1000
ND 1000
NO 1000
ND 1009
ND 1009
Result Det. Limit
ND 154
ND W
ND t50 -
NO tSO
ND 300
ND m
ND t50
ND tS$
ND tSO
ND 380
ND 159
ND 150
ND ISO
NO 750
ND 750
NO 150
ND ISO
ND 150
ND 159
ND tSO
ND ISO
NO 150
NO 150
ND ISO
ND ISO
NO 150
ND 150
NO 1S$
ND 150
ND 150
NO Not detected at specified detection limit
(1) For a detailed description of flags and technical terms in this report refer to Appendix A in this report.
(2) 4-Methylphenol co-elutes with 3-methyIphenol. The
value reported is the combined total of the 2
compounds.
-------
RADIAN
CORPORATION
Amalgamated Sugar
Radian Work Order: 91-02-094
Analytical Data Summary
Page: 5
Hethod:SU8270-Seซi-Volatiles (1)
List:Table 1 Analytes
Sample ID: AS-1R.1I.1X.1- AS-2R,2I.2X,2- AS-3R.31 ,3X,3- AS-4R,4I,4X.4F
FJC F,2C F.3C
Factor: 50 50 100 15
Results in: ug ug ug ug
06A 12A 18A 23A
Matrix: MM5 M*5 MM5 HM5
3-Methylcholanthrene
2-Hethylnaphthalene
2-Hethylphenol
-------
RADIAN
COHPOIIJITION
Amalgamated Sugar
Radian Work Order: 91-02-094
Analytical Data Summary
Page: 6
Method:SU8270-Semi-Volatiles (1)
List:Table 1 Analytes
Sample ID: AS-1R.1I.1X.1- AS-2R,2t.2X,2- AS-3R.3I,3X,3- AS-4R,4I,4X,4F
F,1C F,2C F.3C
Factor: 50 50 100 15
Results in: ug ug ug ug
06A 12A 1SA 23A
Matrix: MM5 MH5 MM5 MH5
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
Surrogate Recovery(X)
2-Fluorobiphenyl
Control Limits: 30 to 115
2-Fluorophenol
Control Limits: 25 to 121
Mitrobenzene-d5
Control Limits: 23 to 120
Phenol-d5
Control Limits: 24 to 113
Terphenyl-d14
Control Limits: 18 to 137
2 , 4 , 6- T r i bromopheno I
Control Limits: 19 to 122
(See next* page for ter
Result Det. Limit
NO 580
ND 500
ND 500
96
76
108
0 Q
118
81
Result Det. Limit
ND 509
ND SO&
ND 500
102
72
96
90
120
0 Q
itatively identified compounds.)
Result Det. Limit
ND 1CKป
ND 1000
ND 1000
90
51
81
91
125
93
Result Det. Limit
ND ISfl
ND t5&
ND t5O
87
13 0
107
7 Q
61
0 Q
ND Not detected at specified detection limit Q Outside control limits
(1) For a detailed description of flags and technical terms in this report refer to Appendix A in this report.
(2) 4-Methylphenol co-elutes with 3-methylphenol. The
value reported is the combined total of the 2
compounds.
-------
IOKPORATIOI
Amalgamated Sugar
Radian Work Ordtr: 91-02-094
Analytical Data Summary
Page: 7
Method:SW8270-Semi-Volatiles (1)
List:Table 1 Analytes
Sample ID: Reagent Blank
Factor: 1
Results in: ug
28A
Matrix: MM5
Acenaphthene
Acenaphthylene
Acetophenone
4- Ami nobi phenyl
Aniline
Anthracene
Benzidine
Benzo(a)anthracene
Benzo(a)pyrene
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
Benzo(k)f luoranthene
Benzoic acid
Benzyl alcohol
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether
Butylbenzylphthalate
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol
p-Chloroaniline
bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane
bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether
bis(2-Chloroisopropyl)ether
1-Chloronaphthalene
2-Ch 1 oronaph tha I ene
2-Chlorophenol
4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether
Chrysene
Di-n-octylphthalate
Oibenz(a,h)anthracene
Dibenz(a,j)acridine
Dibenzofuran
Result Det. Limit
ND 18
ND 10
ND 10
ND 10
ND 10
ND 10
ND 10
ND 10
ND 10
ND 10
ND 10
ND 10
ND 59
ND 10
ND 10
ND 10
ND 10
ND 10
ND 10
ND 1&
ND 10
ND 10
ND 10
ND 1&
NO 13
ND 10
ND 10
ND 10
ND 1$
ND 19
+
NO Not detected at specified detection limit
(1) For a detailed description of flags and technical term in this report refer to Appendix A in this report.
(2) 4-Methylphenol co-elutes with 3-methylphenol. The
value reported is the combined total of the 2
compounds.
-------
CORPORATIOI
Amalgamated Sugar
Radian Work Order: 91-02-094
Analytical Data Summary
Page: 8
Method:SU8270-Semi-Volatiles (1)
List:Tabte 1 Analytes
Sample ID: Reagent Blank
Factor: 1
Results in: ug
28A
Matrix: MM5
Dibutylphthalate
1 , 2-D i ch I orobenzene
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1, 4-0 ich I orobenzene
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine
2,4-Dichlorophenol
2,6-Dichlorophenol
Diethylphthalate
p-Oimethylaminoazobenzene
7,12-Dimethylbenz(a)anthracene
D i methy 1 phenethy I ami ne
2,4-0 imethylphenol
Dimethylphthalate
4,6-Dinitro-2-ปethylphenol
2,4-Dinitrophenol
2,4-Oinitrotoluene
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
Diphenylamine
1,2-Diphenylhydrazine
Ethyl methanesulfonate
bis(2-Ethylhexyl )phthalate
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
Hexach I orobenzene
Kexach 1 orobutadi ene
Hexachlorocyc lopentadi ene
Hexach I oroethane
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
Isophorone
Methyl methanesulfonate
Result Det. Limit
NO 10:
NO tO
ND 10
ND 10
ND 29
NO J0
ND 10
ND 10
ND 19
ND 25
ND 10
ND 10
ND 19
ND S9
ND 59
ND 10
ND 19
ND 10
ND 10
ND 10
ND 10
ND 10
ND 10
ND 10
ND 10
ND W
ND 10
NO 10
ND 19
ND 10
'
f
(
NO Not detected at specified detection limit
(1) For a detailed description of flags and technical terms in this report refer to Appendix A in this report.
(2) 4-Methylphenol co-elutes with 3 -me thy I phenol . The
value reported is the combined total of the 2
compounds.
-------
CORPORATIO
Amalgamated Sugar
Radian Work Order: 91-02-094
Analytical Data Summary
Page: 9
Method:SU8270-Semi-VolatUes (1)
ListrTable 1 Analytes
Sanple ID: Reagent Blank
Factor: 1
Results in: ug
28A
Matrix: MM5
3-Methylcholanthrene
2-Methylnaphthalene
2-Methylphenol(o-cresol)
4-Methylphenol(p-cresol)
N-Nitroso-di-n-butylamine
M-Nitrosodimethylamine
M-Ni trosodi pheny I ami ne
N-Nitrosodipropylamine
N-Nitrosopiperidine
Naphthalene
1-Naphthylamine
2-Naphthylamine
2-Nitroaniline
3-Nitroaniline
4-Nitroaniline
Nitrobenzene
2-Nitrophenol
4-Nitrophenol
Pentach I orobenzene
Pent ach I oron i t robenzene
Pentach lorophenol
Phenacetin
Phenanthrene
Phenol
2-Picoline
Pronamide
Pyrene
Pyridine
1,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene
2,3r4,6-Tetrachlorophenol
Result Det. Limit
ND 10
ND 10
ND 10
ND 10
ND 10
ND 10
ND 10
ND 10
ND 10
ND 19
ND 19 .
ND 10
ND 50
ND 50
ND 542
ND 10
ND 10
ND SO
ND 10
ND 10
ND SO
ND 14
ND 10
ND 10
ND 10
ND 14
ND 10
ND 10
ND 10
ND 20
K
ND Not detected at specified detection limit
(1) For a detailed description of flags and technical terms in this report refer to Appendix A in this report.
(2) 4-Methylphenol co-elutes with 3-methylphenol . The
value reported is the combined total of the 2
compounds.
-------
RADIAN
CORPORATION
Amalgamated Sugar
Radian Work Order: 91-02-094
Analytical Data Surmary
Page: 10
Hethod:SU8270-Semi-Volat1les (1)
List:Table 1 Analytes
Sample 10: Reagent Blank
Factor:
Results in:
Matrix:
1
ug
28A
MM5
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
Surrogate Recovery(X)
2-Fluorobiphenyl
Control Limits: 30 to 115
2-Fluorophenol
Control Limits: 25 to 121
Nitrobenzene-d5
Control Limits: 23 to 120
Phenol-d5
Control Limits: 24 to 113
Terphenyl-d14
Control Limits: 18 to 137
2,4,6- T r i bromopheno I
Control Limits: 19 to 122
Result Det. Limit
NO 19
NO W
NO 13.
89
77
91
87
103
82
NO Not detected at specified detection limit
(1) For a detailed description of flags and technical terms in this report refer to Appendix A in this report.
(2) 4-Methylphenol co-elutes with 3-methylphenol. The
value reported is the combined total of the 2
compounds.
-------
RADIAN
Amalgamated Sugar
Radian Work Order: 91-02-094
Analytical Data Summary
Page: 11
Tentatively Identified Compounds
Method: SW8270-Semi-Volatiles (1)
List: Table 1 Analytes
Sample ID
AS-1R,1I,1X,1F,1C
AS-2R,2I,2X,2F,2C
Analyte
Unknown cyclic alkene
C1-Pyrazine
Furancarboxaldehyde
C2-Pyrazine
C2-Pyrazine
Benzaldehyde
C1-Furancarboxaldehyde
C3-Pyrazine
Hydroxy benzaldehyde
Unknown carboxylic acid
Unknown cyclic alkene
C1-Pyrazine
Furancarboxaldehyde
Furan methanol
C2-Pyrazine
C2-Pyrazine
C1 -FurancarboxaIdehyde
C3-Pyrazine
Result Units Scan
30000
5900
11000
7600
2100
1600
1400
3000
810
2900
38000
5600
8400
990
7000
1900
2500
710
ug
ug
ug
ug
ug
ug
ug
ug
ug
ug
ug
ug
ug
ug
ug
ug
ug
ug
-------
COKPOKATIO
Amalgamated Sugar
Radian Work Order: 91-02-094
Analytical Data Summary
Page: 12
Tentatively Identified Compounds
Method: SU8270-Semi-Volatiles (1)
List: Table 1 Analytes
Sample ID
AS-3R,3I,3X,3F,3C
AS-4R,4I,4X,4F
Analyte
Unknown carboxylic acid
Hydroxy methoxy benzaldehyde
Unknown cyclic alkene
C1-Pyrazine
Furancarboxaldehyde
Furan methaneI
C2-Pyrazine
C2-Pyrazine
Benzaldehyde
C1-Furancarboxaldehyde
C3-Pyrazine
Hydroxy Benzaldehyde
d-Pyrazine
FurancarboxaIdehyde
Dimethylsulfoxide
Unknown
Benzofuran
Unknown
Result
570
490
47000
5200
11000
820
7200
2200
2100
2700
1100
1200
270
67
840
150
160
93
Units
ug
ug
ug
ug
ug
ug
ug
ug
ug
ug
ug
ug
ug
ug
ug
ug
ug
ug
Scan
-------
CORPORATION ....
Analytical Data Summary Page: 13
Amalgamated Sugar
Radian Work Order: 91-02-094
L
Tentatively Identified Compounds
Method: SU8270-Semi-Volatiles (1)
List: Table 1 Analytes
Sample ID Analyte Result Units Scan
Unknown hydrocarbon 100 ug
Unknown hydrocarbon 77 ug
Unknown 55 ug
Unknown alcohol 200 ug
-------
CORPOMATIOI
Amalgamated Sugar
Radian Work Order: 91-02-094
Analytical Data Summary
Page: 14
Method:SW8270-Semi-Volatiles (1)
List:Table 1 Anatytes
Saddle ID: AS-5C Reagent Blank
Factor: 1 1
Results in: ug ug
26A 27A
Matrix: MM5 MM5
Acenaphthene
Acenaphthylene
Acetophenone
4-Aminobiphenyl
Aniline
Anthracene
Benzidine
Benzo(a)anthracene
Benzo(a)pyrene
Benzo(b)f luoranthene
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
Benzo( k ) f I uoranthene
Benzole acid
Benzyl alcohol
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether
Butylbenzylphthalate
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol
p-Chloroanilin*
bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane
bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether
bis(2-Chloroisopropyl)ether
1 Ch I oronaph tha I ene
2-Chloronaphthalene
2-Chlorophenol
4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether
Chrysene
Di-n-octylphthalate
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene
DibenzCa, j)acridine
Dibenzofuran
(See next page for tei
Result Det. Limit
ND 19
NO JO
ND 10
ND 10
ND 10
ND 10
ND 10
ND 10
ND 19
ND W
ND 10
ND 10
ND 59
ND JO
ND 10
ND 10
ND 19
ND !0
ND 10
ND 10
ND 19
ND 10
ND 10
ND 10
ND 19
ND 10
ND 10
ND 10
ND 1&
ND W-
Result Det. Limit
ND 10
ND 10
ND 10
ND 10
ND 10
ND 10
ND 1&
ND 10
ND 16
ND 10
ND 10
ND 10
ND 50
ND 10
ND 10
ND 10
ND 10
ND 10
ND 10
ND 10
ND 10
ND 10
ND 10
ND 10
ND 10
ND 10
ND 10
ND 10
ND 10
ND 10
itatively identified compounds.)
'*< '''
''"*(
''/,
'?'
' ' s
NO Not detected at specified detection limit
(1) For a detailed description of flags and technical terms in this report refer to Appendix A in this report.
(2) 4-Methylphenol co-elutes with 3-methylphenol. The
value reported is the combined total of the 2
compounds
-------
RADIAN
CORPORATION
Amalgamated Sugar
Radian Work Order: 91-02-094
Analytical Data Summary
Page: 15
Hethod:SU8270-Semi-Volatiles (1)
List:Table 1 Analytes
Sample 10: AS-5C Reagent Blank
Factor: 1 1
Results in: ug ug
26A 27A
Matrix: MM5 MH5
Dibutylphthalate
1,2-Oichlorobenzene
1,3-Oichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine
2,4-Dichlorophenol
2,6-Oichlorophenol
Diethylphthalate
p-D imethy I ami noazobenzene
7, 12-0imethylbenz(a)anthracene
Dimethylphenethylamine
2,4-Dimethylphenol
Dimethylphthalate
4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol
2,4-Dinitrophenol
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
2,6-Oinitrotoluene
Diphenylamine
1,2-Diphenylhydrazine
Ethyl methanesulfonate
bis(2-Ethylhexyl >phthalate
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
Hexach I orobenzene
Hexach 1 orobutadi ene
Hexach 1 orocyc I opent ad i ene
Hexach I oroethane
I ndeno( 1 , 2 , 3- cd)pyrene
Isophorone
Methyl methanesulfonate
(See next page for ter
Result Det. Limit
NO 10
NO J0
ND 10
ND 1$
ND 20
ND *0
ND 13
ND 10
ND 10
NO 2$
ND 10
ND 10
ND 10
ND SO
ND 50
NO 10
ND 10
ND 10
ND 10
ND 10
ND 10
ND 50
ND 1<*
ND 10
ND 10
ND $$
ND 10
ND 10
NO 10
ND W.
Result Det. Limit
ND 10
ND 1Q
ND ID
NO 10
ND 28
ND 19
ND 10
ND 10
ND 18
ND 2S
ND 10
NO 10
ND 18
ND SO
ND SO
ND 10
ND 18
ND 10
ND 10
ND 10
ND 18
ND 10
ND 10
ND 10
ND 18
ND 10
ND 10
ND 10
ND 18
ND 10
itatively identified compounds.)
.
.
ND Not detected at specified detection limit
(1) For a detailed description of flags and technical terms in this report refer to Appendix A in this report.
(2) 4-Methylphenol co-elutes with 3-methylphenoL. The
value reported is the combined total of the 2
compounds.
-------
Amalgamated Sugar
Radian Work Order:
91-02-094
Analytical Data Summary
Page: 16
Method:SW8270-Semi-Volatiles (1)
List:Table 1 Analytes
Sample ID: AS-5C Reagent Blank
Factor: 1 1
Results in: ug ug
26A 27A
Matrix: MM5 MM5
3-Methylcholanthrene
2-Methylnaphthalene
2-Methylphenol(o-cresol)
4-Methylphenol(p-cresol)
N-Nitroso-di-n-butylamine
N - M i t rosodi methy 1 ami ne
N-Ni trosodipheny I ami ne
N-Ni t rosodi propy 1 ami ne
N-Nitrosopiperidine
Naphthalene
1-Naphthylamine
2-Naphthylamine
2-Nitroaniline
3-Nitroaniline
4-Nitroaniline
Nitrobenzene
2-Nitrophenol
4-Nitrophenol
Pentach I orobenzene'
Pentachloroni trobenzene
Pentachlorophenol
Phenacetin
Phenanthrene
Phenol
2-Picoline
Pronamide
Pyrene
Pyridine
1,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene
2,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol
(See next page for ter
Result Det. Limit
ND 10
NO 10
ND 10
ND 10
ND 1&
ND 10
ND 10
ND 10
ND 10
ND 10
ND 10
ND 10
ND 50
ND SO
ND 5ft
ND 10
ND 19
ND 50
ND 10
ND 10
ND 59
ND 10
ND 10
ND 10
ND 1&
ND 10
ND 10
ND 10
NO 19
ND 2$
itatively identified con
Result Det. Limit
ND 16
ND 16
ND 10
ND 16
ND 16
ND 10
ND 10
ND 10
ND 16
ND 10
ND 10
ND 10
ND 56
ND SO
ND 50
ND 10
ND 16
ND SO
ND 10
ND 10
ND 56
ND 19
ND 10
ND 16
ND 16
ND 19
ND 10
ND 10
ND 16
ND 20
npounds. )
ND Not detected at specified detection limit
(1) For a detailed description of flags and technical terms in this report refer to Appendix A In this report.
(2) 4-Methylphenol co-elutes with 3-methylphenol. The
value reported is the combined total of the 2
compounds.
-------
RADIAN
CORPORATION
Amalgamated Sugar
Radian Work Order: 91-02-094
Analytical Data Surmary
Page: 17
Method : SW8270 - Semi -Vo 1 at i les (1)
List:Table 1 Analytes
Sample 10: AS-5C Reagent Blank
Factor: 1 1
Results in: ug ug
26A 27A
Matrix: MMS MM5
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
Surrogate Recoverv(X)
2-Fluorobiphenyl
Control Limits: 30 to 115
2-Fluorophenol
Control Limits: 25 to 121
Nitrobenzene-dS
Control Limits: 23 to 120
Phenol-o5
Control Limits: 24 to 113
Terphenyl-dU
Control Limits: 18 to 137
2 , 4 , 6- T r i bromopheno I
Control Limits: 19 to 122
(See next page for ter
Result Oct. Limit
NO 10
ND tf
ND 10
87
64
92
52
100
60
ttatively identified con
Result Det. Limit
ND 16
ND 1
-------
RADIAN
CORPORATION . , . , _
Analytical Data Summary Page: 18
Amalgamated Sugar
Radian Work Order: 91-02-094
Tentatively Identified Compounds
Method: SU8270-Semi-Volatiles (1)
List: Table 1 Analytes
Sample 10 Analyte Result Units Scan
AS-5C
Unknown alcohol 460 ug
C3-Oxazoline 220 ug
C1-Pyrazine 410 ug
C2-Pyrazine 1800 ug
Benzaldehyde 150 ug
C3-Pyrazine 1500 ug
C4-Pyrazine 100 ug
C4-Pyrazine 370 ug
Unknown hydrocarbon 990 ug
Unknown hydrocarbon 480 ug
-------
RADIAN
CORPORATION
Amalgamated Sugar
Radian Work Order: 91-02-094
Sample History
Page:19
Sample Identifications and Dates
Sample 10 AS-1R.1t,1X,1- AS-2R.2I ,2X,2- AS-3R,3I,3X,3- AS-4R.4I.4X.4F AS-MX MS AS-5C
F,1C F.2C F,3C
Date Sampled 02/05/91 02/05/91
Date Received 02/11/91 02/11/91 02/11/91 02/11/91 02/11/91 02/11/91
Matrix HMS MM5 MM5 MM5 MH5 MM5
06 12 18 23 25 26
SU8270-Semi-Volatiles
Prepared
Analyzed
Analyst
File ID
Blank ID
Instrument
Report as
SW8270-Semi -volatile*
Prepared
Analyzed
Analyst
File ID
Blank ID
Instrument
Report as
SU8270-Semi-Volatiles
Prepared
Analyzed
Analyst
File ID
Blank ID
Instrument
Report as
02/18/91
03/05/91
MCK
86773
86792
MSD1
received
02/18/91
03/05/91
MCK
86774
86792
MSD1
received
02/18/91
03/05/91
MCK
86775
86792
MSD1
received
02/18/91
03/18/91
MCK
86886
86792
MSD1
received
02/18/91
03/20/91
MCK
86920
86792
MSD1
received
02/18/91
03/06/91
MCK
86791
86792
MSD1
received
-------
RADIAN
Amalgamated Sugar
Radian Work Order: 91-02-094
Sample History
Page:20
Sample Identifications and Dates
Sample ID Reagent Blank Reagent Blank
Date Sampled
Date Received 02/11/91 02/11/91
Matrix MMS MM5
27 28
SU8270-Semi -Volatile*
Prepared
Analyzed
Analyst
File ID
Blank ID
Instrument
Report as
SU8270-Semi-Volatiles
Prepared
Analyzed
Analyst
File ID
Blank ID
Instrument
Report as
02/18/91
03/06/91
MCK
86792
86792
MSD1
received
02/18/91
03/06/91
MCK
86792
86792
MSD1
received
f
.
-------
RADIAN
CORPORATION
Appendix A
Comnents, Notes and Definitions
-------
RADIAN
CORPOR
Notes and Definitions Page: A-2
Amalgamated Sugar
Radian Work Order: 91-02-094
3 ALL METHODS EXCEPT CLP
The results uhich are less than five times the method specified
detection limit.
EXPLANATION
Uncertainty of the analysis will increase as the method detection
limit is approached. These results should be considered approximate.
J ORGANIC METHODS
Indicates an estimated value for GC/MS data.
EXPLANATION
This flag is used either when estimating a concentration for
tentatively identified compounds where a response factor of 1 is
assumed, or when the mass spectral data indicate the presence of a
compound that meets the identification criteria but the result is less
than the sample quantitat ion limit.
NC ALL METHODS EXCEPT CLP
The relative percent difference (RPD)and spike recovery are not
calculated when a result value is less than five times the detection
limit or obvious matrix interferences are present or a surrogate
concentration is not calculated due to dilution.
EXPLANATION
See 8 definition for data near the detection limit. A spike recovery
is not calculated when the sample result is greater than four times
the spike added concentration because the spike added concentration is
insignificant. Surrogate recoveries are not calculated due to dilution
to allow analyte quantitation.
ND ALL METHODS EXCEPT CLP
This flag is used to denote analytes which are not detected at or
above the specified detection limit.
EXPLANATION
The value to the right of the < symbol is the method specified
detection limit for the analyte.
0 ALL METHODS EXCEPT CLP
This quality control standard is outside method or laboratory spec-
ified control limits.
EXPLANATION
This flag is applied to matrix spike, analytical QC spike, and
surrogate recoveries; and to RPD(relative percent difference)
values for duplicate analyses and matrix spike/matrix spike
duplicate result.
-------
RADIAN
T I O I
Notes and Definitions
Amalgamated Sugar
Radian Work Order: 91-02-094
Page: A-3
TERMS USED IN THIS REPORT:
Analyte - A chemical for which a sample is to be analyzed.
EPA method and QC specifications.
The analysis will meet
Compound - See Analyte.
Detection Limit - The method specified detection limit, which is the lower limit of
quant itation specified by EPA for a method. Radian staff regularly assess their
laboratories' method detection limits to verify that they meet or are lower than those
specified by EPA. Detection limits which are higher than method limits are based
on experimental values at the 99X confidence level. The detection limits for EPA CLP
(Contract Laboratory Program) methods are CROLs (contract required quant itat ion
limits) for organics and CRDLs (contract required detection limits) for inorganics.
Note, the detection limit may vary from that specified by EPA based on sample
size, dilution or cleanup. (Refer to Factor, below)
EPA Method - The EPA specified method used to perform an analysis. EPA has specified
standard methods for analysis of environmental samples. Radian will perform its
analyses and accompanying QC tests in conformance with EPA methods unless otherwise specified.
Factor - Default method detection limits are based on analysis of clean water samples.
A factor is required to calculate sample specific detection limits based on alternate
matrices (soil or water), reporting units, use of cleanup procedures, or dilution of extracts/
digestates. For example, extraction or digestion of 10 grams of soil in contrast
to 1 liter of water will result in a factor of 100.
Matrix - The sample material. Generally, it will be soil, water, air, oil, or solid
waste.
Radian Work Order - The unique Radian identification code assigned to the samples reported in
the analytical summary.
Units - ug/L micrograms per liter (parts per bill ion);liquids/water
ug/kg micrograms per kilogram (parts per billion); soils/solids
ug/M3 micrograms per cubic meter; air samples
mg/L milligrams per liter (parts per million);liquids/water
g/kg milligrams per kilogram (parts per miIIion);soiIs/solid*
X percent; usually used for percent recovery of QC standards
uS/cm conductance unit; microSiemans/centimeter
mL/hr mill liters per hour; rate of settlement of matter in water
MTU turbidity unit; nephelometric turbidity unit
CU color unit; equal to 1 mg/L of chloroplatinate salt
-------
RADIAN
COKPORATIOM
Chain-of-Custody Reports
-------
Chain of Custody Record
PROJECT
AM A LA.A**Tฃf SfJ^A 4
SAM ID NO.
(for lab use only)
SAMPLE MATRIX
FIELD SAMPLE I.D.
s- //?
At-?4
RELINQUISHED BY
DATE I TIME I RECEIVED BY
DATE I TIME I RELINQUISHED BY:
RELINQUISHED BY
RECEIVED BY:
LAB USE ONLY
-------
Chain of Custody Record
COJf ECTED BY (Signature)
SAM ID NO.
(for lab use only)
LAB USE ONLY
mum
-------
Chain of Custody Record
LAB USE ONLY
T84E
-------
Chain of Custody Record
COLLECTED BY (S>gn*ui*)
SAM ID NO
(tor lab use only)
LAB USE ONLY
-------
RADIAN
CORPORATION
AUSTIN
Corporate Headquarters
8501 Mopac Blvd.
P.O. Box 201088
Austin, TX 78720-1088
(512)454-4797
FAX 512-454-7129
Summit Park
Austin, TX
(512|244-0855
FAX 512-244-0160
Radian Electronics Services Center
Austin, TX
(512|244-0100
FAX 512-388-0966
ATLANTA
(404)294-4321
FAX 404-292-9247
BATON ROUGE
(504) 292-0852
FAX 504-293-2901
BOULDER
(303)443-2378
FAX 303-443-1628
CINCINNATI
(513)738-6018
FAX 513-738-8913
DENVER
(303)292-0800
FAX 303-292-5860
HOUSTON
(713)785-9225
FAX 713-785-9390
LOS ANGELES
(213)640-0045
FAX 213-640-8940
LOUISVILLE
(502)425-9530
FAX 502-425-9625
MILWAUKEE
(414)643-2720
FAX 414-643-2699
OAK RIDGE
(615)483-9870
FAX 615-483-9061
ORANGE COUNTY
(714)261-8611
FAX 714-262-6505
RALEIGH/DURHAM
(919)541-9100
FAX 919-541-9013
Perimeter Park
Morrisville, NC
(919)481-0212
FAX 919-460-1631
ROCHESTER
(716)292-1870
FAX 716-292-1878
SACRAMENTO
(916)362-5332
FAX 916-362-2318
SAN FRANCISCO
(415)686-2174
FAX 415-689-6379
SEATTLE
(206)441-1106
FAX 206-441-4269
WASHINGTON, D.C.
(703)834-1500
FAX 703-834-1512
HONG KONG
5-231016
FAX (05) 868-1686
LONDON
Radian Limited
(0483) 729307
FAX (0483] 725233
TAIWAN
(02) 7816161
FAX (02) 775-5906
TORONTO
(416)363-6527
FAX 416-363-0538
A company of The Hartford Steam Boiler
Inspection and Insurance Co.
7/91
------- |