United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Office of Air Quality
Planning and Standards
Research Triangle Park NC 27711
EPA-450/2-80-074
June 1980
Air
Health Impacts,
Emissions, and Emission
Factors for IMoncriteria
Pollutants Subject to
De Minimis Guidelines and
Emitted from Stationary
Conventional Combustion
Processes

-------

-------
This report is issued by the Environmental Protection Agency to report technical data of
interest to a limited number of readers.  Copies are available - in limited quantities - from
the Library Services Office (MD-35) , U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research
Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711; or, for a fee, from the National Technical Infor-
mation Service, 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield, Virginia 22161.

-------
                             TABLE OF CONTENTS


                                                i

                                                                       Page

1.  INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY                                            1

2.  HEALTH AND ECOLOGICAL EFFECTS                                       5

    2.1  HEALTH AND ECOLOGICAL EFFECTS ON POPULATIONS                   6

         2.1.1  Mercury                                                 6
         2.1.2  Beryllium                                              11
         2.1.3  Asbestos                                               14
         2.1.4  Fluorides                                              16
         2.1.5  Sulfuric Acid Mist                                     20
         2.1.6  Vinyl Chloride                                         24
         2.1.7  Hydrogen Sulfide                                       26
         2.1.8  Methyl Mercaptan                                       29
      ••  2.1.9  Dimethyl Sulfide                                       30
      •   2.1.10 Dimethyl Disulfide                                     31
         2.1.11 Carbon Disulfide                                       31
         2.1.12 Carbonyl Sulfide                                       34

    2.2  ECOSYSTEM EFFECTS                                             35

3.  NATIONAL EMISSIONS                                                 37

    3.1  TRACE ELEMENTS                                                37

    3.2  ASBESTOS                                                      37

    3.3  SULFURIC ACID MIST                                            41

    3.4  VINYL CHLORIDE                                                41

    3.5  TOTAL REDUCED SULFUR AND REDUCED SULFUR COMPOUNDS             41

    3.6  SUMMARY OF EMISSIONS                                          45

4.  EMISSION FACTORS                                                   48

    4.1  TRACE ELEMENTS                                .                48

    4.2  SULFURIC ACID MIST                                            55

    4.3  ASBESTOS AND VINYL CHLORIDE                                   57

-------
                       TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued)

                                                                       Page

5.  DEVELOPMENT OF EMISSION FACTORS                                      58

    5.1  TRACE ELEMENT EMISSIONS                                         58

         5.1.1  External Combustion - Utility Boilers                    58
         5.1.2  External Combustion - Industrial Boilers                 62
         5.1.3  Internal Combustion - Industrial or                      63
                Electricity Generation
         5.1.4  External Combustion - Commercial/Institutional           64

    5.2  ASBESTOS EMISSIONS                                              65

    5.3  SULFURIC ACID MIST EMISSIONS                                    71

    5.4  VINYL CHLORIDE EMISSIONS                                        69

    5.5  TOTAL REDUCED SULFUR AND REDUCED SULFUR COMPOUND EMISSIONS      70

6.  SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS PROCEDURES USED TO OBTAIN EMISSIONS DATA       72

    6.1  SAMPLING METHODOLOGY                                            72

    6.2  ANALYTICAL METHODOLOGY                                          74

    6.3  ADEQUACY OF DATA FOR EMISSION FACTOR DEVELOPMENT                75

    6.4  IMPLICATIONS OF EMISSION FACTOR VARIABILITIES FOR
         EMISSIONS CALCULATIONS                                          81

APPENDIX A:  PERSONS CONTACTED FOR INFORMATION ON TOTAL REDUCED          79
             SULFUR AND REDUCED SULFUR EMISSIONS

REFERENCES                                          •                     80

-------
                       1.  INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY
     Rules have been proposed in the September 5, 1979, Federal Register '
(Volume 44, Number 173) involving the Prevention of Significant Air Quality
Deterioration (PSD).  If adopted, these would substantially modify the
existing procedures for approving the construction or modification of
sources of pollutants regulated by the Clean Air Act.  A concept discussed
in these rules involves the authority of EPA to exempt some situations from
PSD review.  These situations are called de minimi's.  Emission cutoffs for
twenty pollutants have been published in the Supplementary Information for
these rules (44 FR 51937) and are proposed as guidelines to determine if
potential emissions from a source subject to PSD review could be considered
insignificant.  These emissions levels were based on ambient air quality
levels considered protective of public health and welfare, and were derived
from these air quality levels (44 FR 51938) by means of a conservative
modeling analysis.  The guideline emission rates and air quality levels for
the noncriteria pollutants in this list are shown in Table 1-1.
    TRW Inc., Radian Corporation, and Battelle Columbus Laboratories are
in the process of developing an extensive information base on environmental
health effects, emissions, and pollution control technology for Stationary
Conventional Combustion Processes (SCCP) as part of the ConventionaT^om-0*  .^ +
bustion Environmental Assessment (CCEA) program for EPA's Industrial
Environmental Research Laboratory.  The source categories included as SCCP
are shown in Table 1-2.
    This report summarizes the results of a quick-response task assignment
to TRW and Battelle under the CCEA Systems Contract to use the CCEA infor-
mation base in developing the following kinds of information for the pollu-
tants listed in Table 1-1:
    •  Health and ecological impacts associated with de minimis air quality
       levels.
    0  Emission factors for SCCP source categories.
    •  Comparison of emission levels from important source categories
       for each pollutant.
    •  Sampling and analysis methods, associated accuracies, and implica-
       tions of variabilities of emission factors.

-------
           TABLE 1-1  NONCRITERIA DE MINIMIS GUIDELINES FOR SIGNIFICANT EMISSION  RATES
                      AND AMBIENT AIR QUALITY IMPACTS


Pollutant
Mercury
Beryllium
Asbestos
Fluorides
Sulfuric Acid Mist
Vinyl Chloride
Total Reduced Sulfur:
Hydrogen Sulfide
Methyl Mercaptan
Dimethyl Sulfide
Dimethyl Disulfide
Reduced Sulfur Compounds:
Hydrogen Sulfide
Carbon Disulfide
Carbonyl Sulfide
Significant
Emission Rate
(metric tons/year)
0.2
0.004
1
0.02
!^ —
1

1
1
1
1

1
10
10
Significant
Air Quality
Wm3)
0.1
0.005
1
0.01
1
1

1
0.5
0.5
2

1
200
200

Impact

(24 hr)
(24 hr)
1 hr)
(24 hr)
(24 hr)
(max. value)

( 1 hr)
( 1 hr)
( 1 hr)
( 1 hr)

( 1 hr)
( 1 hr)
( 1 hr)
Source:   Federal Register - September 5, 1979, Pp 51937-8(222.)

-------
This information is developed in this report for all sources shown in
Table 1-2.  In order to be consistent with the EPA timetable for promulga-
tion of the proposed rules, the following constraints were placed on this
assignment:
     •  Period of performance:  two months.
     •  Resources:  only the existing CCEA information base.
     •  Emission sources considered:  stationary conventional combustion
        processes (SCCP) only.
     Normally the Residential sector is included as a fourth emission source
category.  However, it will not be considered in this study, since residen-
tial sources probably will not be subject to PSD regulation.  The informa-
tion listed above and the assumptions and methods used to compile this
information are discussed in the following sections.
     Although developing conclusions relative to the magnitude of the
de minimis emission and ambient levels in the proposed regulation was not
one of the objectives of this study, several observations can be made in
summary of the information accumulated in this report:
     •  Health and ecological impacts.  The results of the investigation
        of the health effects of the noncriteria de minimi's pollutants
        vary by pollutant (see Section 2.1).  Comparisons of dose-response
          TABLE  1-2.  MAJOR  STATIONARY CONVENTIONAL COMBUSTION
                      PROCESS SOURCE CATEGORIES CONSIDERED IN
                      THIS STUDY
ELECTRICITY GENERATION
External Combustion
Coal
Petroleum
Gas
Internal Combustion
Petroleum
Gas
INDUSTRIAL
External Combustion
Coal
Petroleum
Gas
Internal Combustion
Petroleum
Gas
COMMERCIAL/ INSTITUTIONAL
External Combustion
Coal
Petroleum
Gas
Internal Combustion
Petroleum
Gas

-------
   information in the literature with the de minimi's ambient levels
   are summarized in Section 2.1.  Unfortunately, insufficient
   information is available in the literature to form substantive
   conclusions on ecosystem effects (as opposed to health effects)
   of most of these pollutants (see Section 2.2), and necessary
   research and synthesis are well beyond the scope of this effort.

t  Emission source categories.  Stationary Conventional  Combustion
   Processes (SCCP) produce nearly all  of the beryllium and sulfuric
   acid emissions nationally.  These sources also account for 65
   percent of the fluoride emissions and 25 percent of the mercury
   emissions.  Asbestos, vinyl-chloride and all reduced sulfur com-
   pounds are emitted exclusively by other (non-SCCP) sources,
   according to available data.  (See Section 3).

•  Emission factors.  Based on emission factors in the existing
   information base, emissions of sulfuric acid mist from large
   coal or oil-fired external combustion systems  (utility and large
   industrial boilers, for example) controlled to meet the New
   Source Performance Standards  (NSPS)  will  exceed the de minimi's
   emission levels by orders of magnitude.  Similarly, fluoride
   emissions from NSPS-controlled external combustion sources burn-
   ing coal will  exceed the de minimis  levels significantly.   (See
   Sections 4. and 5.).  Emissions of the remaining noncriteria
   pollutants from combustion sources will not normally exceed
   de minimi's levels, although the uncertainty of emission levels
   calculated with the beryllium emission factors is high due to
   high variabilities of the influence parameters used to develop
   the factors (see Section 6.).

-------
                 2.  HEALTH AND ECOLOGICAL EFFECTS

     Published information on the health and ecological effects of the
twelve subject pollutants was identified, assembled, and reviewed.  This
section summarizes the results of that review.  The biological effects
information necessary for the completion of this study was obtained in
part from a data base assembled at Battelle's Columbus Laboratories for
the EPA's Conventional Combustion Environmental Assessment Program.
This collection of published material, although small, contains useful
data for some of the substances.  These data were augmented via the
results of computer bibliographic searches.  Successful searches on part
of the substances were conducted in BIOSIS, AGRICOLA, NTIS, TOXLINE, and
TOXBACK for the general period 1970 to 1979.   For such topics as odor
thresholds, manual searches were carried out using different keywords in
order to locate as many germane articles as possible within the scope
of work.  Much of the human health effects data were obtained from occu-
pational health studies reported by the National Institute for Occupa-
tional Safety and Health (NIOSH) in Criteria Document reports for the
EPCH chemical.
     Although much useful information was obtained from the above sources
these should not be considered all inclusive.  Additional  information
sources are available but the level of effort of this task precluded
their review.  Effort was placed in reporting observed effects from in-
halation of low concentrations of the twelve pollutants.  Where suffi-
cient data were available they are presented in tables.  Dosages reported
range from the lowest known to cause a measurable effect to those which
generally cause a more deleterious effect.  Each table and accompanying
text feature several species including plants and animals; however,
emphasis is on human responses.
     Data reported in tables emphasize biological responses to low levels
of the pollutant by various target organisms.  The accompanying text dis-
cusses the studies most relevant to the de minimis recommendations, thus
not all data in the tables are discussed in the text.

-------
     Although the availability of low dosage information  exceeded  our
expectations, there remained a general lack of such needed data.   Another
inherent limitation was the lack of rigorous dose-response curves.  Ideally,
the dose-response curve would provide a continuous, quantitative  relation-
ship of a given response by a given species to a given route of entry;  e.g.,
inhalation.  In the absence of such quantitative dose-response curves,
numerous dose-response relationships are presented.  Here, the emphasis
is on the variety of responses by numerous species  to various routes of
entry (although inhalation was the usual one).
     The presentation of the health and ecological  effects has been
divided into three sections:  health and ecological effects, ecosystem
effects, and comparison of de minimis levels with the lowest identified
exposures known to cause biological effects.

2.1  HEALTH AND ECOLOGICAL EFFECTS ON POPULATIONS

     Studies reviewed in this section concentrate on the  effects  of
substances on individual species.  Effects observed include odor  thresh-
olds, changes in rates of morbidity or sickness, changes  in tumor incidence,
and other effects associated with humans, plants, and animals. Throughout,
the effects on humans are discussed first, followed by effects on non-
humans.  Emphasis has been placed on inhalation as the primary route of
exposure.  However, depending on the substance and species involved, other
routes of exposure were considered.

2.1.1  Mercury

     The proposed die minimis value for mercury is 0.1 yg/m  , 24-hour
average.  The health effects from mercury vary depending upon the route
of exposure and form of mercury encountered.
     Exposure to mercury may occur from inhalation of atmospheric mercury,
ingestion of mercury contaminated products, and percutaneous absorption of
mercury.  The research reported below has concentrated on inhalation exposure.

-------
                TABLE 2-1.   HEALTH/ECOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF  POPULATIONS EXPOSED TO MERCURY  IN AIR
. Exposure
Concentration,
mg/m3
0.002-0.005
0.005-0.06
0.01-0.05
0.01-0.27
0.01-0.6* •
0.01
0.08"
3.0
Duration of
Exposure
6.5 hr/d.6 d/Nk
19 yr
>lyr
occupational
exposure
variable
occupational
exposure
(1-20+ yrs.)
9 yr average
occupational
exposure
occupational
exposure
continuous
Species
Rat
Human
Human
Human
Human
Human
Human
Dog
Effects
Changes In conditioned reflexes
Clinical mercury poisoning - tremors erethism 1n
1 of 16 exposed workers.
'Mlcromercurlallsm1 -functional changes In cardio-
vascular, urogenltal, endocrine systems.
Hyperthyroldlsm.
Anorexia, loss of weight, Insomnia, tremors,
dose/response relationship shyness, nervousness
Dose/response relationship Identified. Tremors,
erethism, Impaired memory
Temporary disability, disturbed menstrual function,
elevated percentage of complications In pregnancy
and delivery.
Borderline symptoms of mercury poisoning.
Gingivitis, diarrhea, weight loss after 15 days
Reference
Koumossov 1962 (101), cited
In (90.)
Blstrup, et al, 1951 (84.)
Frlberq and Vostal , 1972
(90.)
Smith, et al., 1970 (103.)
TurHan, et al. , 1956
(104.)
Goncharuk, 1977 (91.)
Neal, et al., 1937, (96.)
1941 (95.)
Fraser, et al., 1934 (89.)
"Analytic methods suspect.  Spot samples obtained, not breathing zone time weighted average (TWA).

-------
However, atmospheric mercury may be incorporated in  aquatic  and  terres-
trial environments.   Inorganic and organic mercury compounds introduced
into these environments may undergo microbial  transformation to  the more
toxic alky! mercury  form.   Aquatic organisms biomagnify the  alkyl  mercury
compounds.  The partitioning of organic and inorganic mercury compounds
within various media and ecosystems is not reported  here.  A more thorough
analysis of this partitioning was not possible in this level of  effort.
     The health effects data in Table 2-1  are based  on respiratory exposures
to inorganic mercury compounds in occupational environments.  The following
narrative reviews some of these data.  Bidstrup et al. (84.) reported
tremors and erethism in one individual occupationally exposed 9.5 years
                                                            3
to inorganic mercury at concentrations of  0.005 to 0.06 mg/m  air.  How-
ever, Friberg and Vostal (90.) question the accuracy of this value as
they note only spot samples were used to estimate worker exposure.
     Friberg and Vostal (90.) described several Russian studies  which
reported an asthenic vegetative syndrome diagnosed as micromercurialism.
The syndrome was reported in workers exposed to 0.01 to 0.05 mg/nr in
work room air.  The syndrome itself was not clearly defined  but  included
neurasthenic symptoms and was diagnosed by the occurrence of any three
of the following symptoms:   tremor, thyroid enlargement, increased uptake
of radioiodine in the thyroid, hematological changes, hypotension, labile
pulse, tachycardia,  dermographism and gingivitis.
     Smith et al. (103.) identified a dose response relationship in workers
occupationally exposed through inhalation  of inorganic mercury in the
manufacture of chlorine.  Anorexia, weight loss, tremors,  insomnia,
shyness, frequent colds, nervousness, diarrhea, alcohol consumption and
dizziness demonstrated a significant positive correlation.  The  author
summarized the clinical results as exhibiting a dose-related response to
mercury exposure by  evidencing higher incidences of neuropsychiatric
symptoms.  The authors concluded that, with respect to most  of the symptoms,
the dose-response relationship does not exhibit sufficiently high incidence
                                                   o
to warrant concern unless exposure exceeds 0.1 mg/m  air.  However, they
noted that there did not appear to be a threshold of effect  for  anorexia

-------
and weight loss, but in these instances uncertainties existed which
led the authors to express a reasonable doubt as to the significance
of the effect.
     Skerfving and Vostal (102.) described a hypersensitive reaction in
persons orally and dermally exposed to inorganic and organic mercury
ointments and teething powders.  The disease, known as acrodynia,  was
characterized by coldness, swelling and irritation of the hands, feet,
cheeks and nose, loss of hair, and ulceration.  Disease onset was
characterized by increasing irritability, photophobia, sleeplessness,
and general dehydration.  Neurological symptoms were also observed.
Mercury exposure was postulated as the etiologic agent, but adequate
analysis and elucidation of the mechanisms of the disease was not  reported.
     Inorganic and organic mercury compounds have demonstrated genetic
effects in humans and nonhumans via consumption of fish contaminated
with methyl mercury (100.).  Ramel (100.) concluded that mercury pollution
has reached a level at which genetic effects on human beings do take place,
noting that little is known of  the medical significance of these chromo-
somal defects.
     The National Research Council (94.) concluded that more subtle effects
from mercury exposure, such as  behavioral or intellectual deficits, may not
be detectable at present due to limitations in clinical procedures of
diagnosis.  The Council concluded that, in view of the toxicity of mercury
and the inability of researchers to specify the threshold levels of toxic
effects, on the basis of present knowledge, all such contamination must
be regarded as undesirable and  potentially hazardous to humans.
     For nonhuman receptors, exposure to mercury following microbial
transformation and bioaccumulation represents a more serious hazard than
inhalation of vaporized mercury.  Air borne elemental mercury has  an
estimated residence time of eleven days, and is removed from the atmosphere
by precipitation.  It is estimated that 40 percent of the mercury emitted
from the stacks of a power generating plant would enter a typical  drainage
system (99.).  Once in the aquatic system, the mercury can be transformed
into methyl mercury, a neurotoxin.  Jensen and Jernelev (92.) demonstrated
that biomethylation of mercury  can be accomplished by the microflora in
the sediments.

-------
     The relative amounts of mono- and dimethyl-mercury  compounds
produced are a function of temperature, pH,  mercury concentration,
organic pollution load, and the microbial  population.   Low concen-
trations of mercury tend to favor the formation of dimethyl mercury,
a relatively inert compound, while higher  concentrations of mercury
favor the formation of monomethyl mercury.  In neutral  and alkaline
environments, dimethyl mercury transformation is favored.  Dimethyl
mercury thus produced will decompose to monomethyl mercury in a slightly
acid condition (88.).
     Potter et al. (99.) studied the bioaccumulation of mercury through
the food chain of Lake Powell, Utah and found that, compared to the
mercury in the water, mercury in fish in the upper trophic level had
increased by a factor of 43,000.  Thus, many of the effects of mercury
cannot be related to a single direct dosage; an organism can receive
additional dosages from eating mercury contaminated prey.
     The LD50* values for intertidal red algae sporelings range from
 3.0  to  8.0mg/l in water (86.).  Boney (85.) however found a 40 percent
inhibition of growth in the red algae Plumaria elegans  21 days after
the sporeling was immersed in a 0.12 mg/1  mercuric chloride solution
for 24 hours.
     Terrestrial animals also bioaccumulate mercury.  Even though concen-
trations of atmospheric mercury may be lower than what would directly
evoke a biological response, the indirect  (food chain)  effects can  be
considerable.  For example, even though the half-life of methylmercury
in mice is 3.7 days (97.), the white-footed deer mouse (Peromyscus
maniculatus) can accumulate enough mercury to impair swimming and open
field behavior (87.).
     Other studies Involving ingestion of mercury by rodents demonstrated
that relatively low dosages cause little to no effects.  For example, 0.22
ppm of continuous exposure in food for two years caused no ill effects to
*Lethal Dose Fifty - a calculated dose of a substance which is expected to
 cause the death of 50 percent of an entire defined experimental animal
 population, as determined from the exposure to the substance by a route
 other than inhalation  of a significant number from that population (244.)
                                   10

-------
rats in either reproduction or histopathology (98.).  Dosages of one mg/
kg/day of continuous feeding caused a depressed rate of body weight gain
after 70 days and mild to severe motor disturbance in five of 18 rats
after 70 days (93.).
     Kournossov (101., cited in 90.) observed changes in conditioned
reflexes in rats exposed to atmospheric concentrations of mercury vapor
at 0.002 mg/m3 to 0.005 mg/m3.  However, Friberg and Vostal  (90.) con-
cluded that the significance of these changes is difficult to evaluate
due to inadequate descriptions of study methods.

2.1.2  Beryllium
                                                              3
     The proposed de minimis level for beryllium is 0.005 yg/m , 24-hour
average.  Several generalities are evident from the literature examined.
The toxicity of beryllium is dependent on its form.  For example, beryllium
fluoride is more toxic than beryllium sulfate or beryllium oxide; in other
words, the more water soluble the compound, the more rapid and severe the
response.  The toxicity of beryllium oxide depends on its chemical and
physical properties.  When injected intratracheally, high-fired beryllium
oxide (calcinated at 1600°C) resulted in fewer adenocarcinomas and minor
cellular reaction in rats as compared to the low-fired oxide (calcined at
1100°C and 500°C)  (117-, cited  in  113.).
     Respiratory exposure to beryllium in occupational environments was
used as the basis for evaluating the human health effects summarized in
Table 2-2.  Respiratory exposures to beryllium have produced both acute
and chronic effects.  These effects have been differentiated by time between
exposure and onset of disease, and by the duration, type, and severity of
health effects.  Acute manifestations of beryllium disease have occurred at
                                         o
high concentrations in excess of 100 yg/m  (105.).  The Beryllium Case
Registry has reported one case of chronic beryllium disease after 9.5 years
exposure to 2.0 yg/m  beryllium daily weighted average (range 0.7 to 5.9
yg/m3) (113.).  Further investigations have indicated that this exposure
may have been greatly underestimated (113.).  The correlation of exposure
                                   11

-------
                    TABLE 2-2.   HEALTH/ECOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF POPULATION  EXPOSED TO BERYLLIUM  IN  AIR
Exposure
Concentration,
(ug/m3)
2.0 average
Range 0.7-5.9
5-650
34 (BeS04)
35 (BeS04)
55
Duration of
Exposure
9.5 years
occupational exposure
Acute occupational
exposure -30 minutes
7 hr/d, 5 d/wk
for 72 weeks
8 hr/d, 5 d/wk
9 hr on Saturday
for 6 months
6 hr/d, 5 d/wk
Species
Human
Human
Rat
Rat
Rat
Effects
Confirmed case of beryllium disease.
Beryllium registry.
Decreased vital capacity, pneumonltis,
bronchitis
Lung tumors first occurred after
9 months exposure; 100% incidence
at 13 months exposure
Pulmonary lesions started on month 6.
Pulmonary lesions (focal and randomly
scattered) after 9 months
Reference
National Institute for
Occupational Safety and
Health, 1972 (113.)
Eisenbud, et al . , 1948
(107.)
Reeves, et al., 1967
(115.)
Schepers, et al., 1957
(116.)
Vorwald and Reeves, 1959
(121O
ro

-------
and effects in other chronic cases has been lacking because of inade-
quate analytical capabilities at the time of exposure.  Therefore, a
dose-response relationship of beryllium exposure at low levels cannot
be developed.
     Several investigators have conducted epidemiological  studies of
occupational exposures to beryllium, attempting to correlate length of
employment in beryllium occupations and cause-specific mortality.  Results
of these studies are inconclusive.  Mancuso (112.) reported an inverse
relationship between length of employment and lung cancer  as well as for
total mortality.  Similar findings were reported by other  investigators
(110.).  Mancuso's results did not establish the carcinogenicity of
beryllium in humans, but mentioned the possibility.  Reeves (114.)
summarized beryllium toxicity thus, "the sum of evidence,  at least thus
far, favors the view that humans, like the guinea pig, are susceptible
to berylliosis but resistant to beryllium cancer".
     Although the carcinogenicity of beryllium is suspect, the etiology
of chronic beryllium disease or "berylliosis" is well established.  Sterner
and Eisenbud (118.) hypothesized that chronic beryllium disease was the
result of antigen-antibody interaction in the affected tissue.  Deodhar
et al. (106.) also reported strong evidence for the existence of cellular
immune reactivity to beryllium in patients with chronic beryllium disease.
     The question then arises, at what level of exposure will an individual
develop a reaction leading to chronic beryllium disease?  Sensitivity
differences between sexes and host variability (114.) makes it difficult
to establish this value.  Neighborhood cases of chronic beryllium disease
                                                        3
were reported at ambient air concentrations of 0.01 yg/m .  Lieben et al.
(111.) questioned these cases and established exposures to beryllium in
excess of the ambient concentrations for each of these "neighborhood cases",
The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health  (113.) concluded
that "it has yet to be definitely established whether ambient air contami-
nation alone, at a distance from a manufacturing/fabricating plant, can
cause chronic beryllium disease".
     Ecological effects of beryllium have been studied in  a limited way,
most of the work being associated with laboratory toxicology studies.
Thus, the studies included in the immediately available literature deal
primarily with laboratory animals.

                                    13

-------
     Stokinger et al.  (119.)  pointed  out  that  the  response to relatively
                                    •3
high dosages of beryllium (1000 pg/m   air)  is  species  specific.  Respira-
tory exposure to equal  concentrations of  beryllium in  six  different
animals produced a wide range of effects  (120.).   Beryllium  concentrations
lethal to rats produced no functional changes  in  rabbits,  although post
mortem examinations of rabbits found  pulmonary lesions.
2.1.3  Asbestos

     The proposed de minimis level for asbestos is 1  yg/m ,  1-hour average.
The health effects from respiratory exposure to asbestos have been well
documented for occupational environments (126.) and,  to a limited extent,
nonoccupational environments (125.).  Health effects  from asbestos exposure
have included diffuse interstitial fibrosis, mesothelial malignancies, and
cancer of the lung and gastrointestinal tract.
     Dose-response curves for asbestos exposures and  cancer of the lung
and digestive tract (128.) have been developed.  Exposure to asbestos
concentrations of 125 mppcf-years* has been associated with excessive
cancer deaths (125.).  Murphy (124.) reported asbestos exposures to 60 mppcf-
years would result in diffuse interstitial  fibrosis.   Individual suscep-
tibilities and other confounding factors may also play a role in disease
incidence as latency periods for lung cancer have ranged from 3.5 to 37
years.
     The review of available literature revealed several methods of analyses
and reporting of asbestos exposure which are not readily interconvertible.
For example, occupational exposures to asbestos were  reported as millions
of particles per cubic foot (mppcf) or fibers per cubic centimeter greater
than 5 pm in length, whereas the de minimis level is  a mass concentration
                   3
measurement in pg/m .  The National Institute for Occupational Safety and
*Mppcf-years:  Millions of particles per cubic foot-years are computed by
 multiplying the asbestos level (mppcf) at each job and time period by
 years at the job and summed across all jobs.  The total cumulative expo-
 sure is thought of as mppcf-years (122.).  It should be noted that such
 exposures are occupational, 8 hours per day, and not continuous as in
 community exposures.
                                   14

-------
Health (126.) considered this conversion problem and concluded that a  general
                                   3
conversion factor for equating yg/m  to mppcf could not be developed.
Inherent differences in asbestos type and operation of the plant generating
the asbestos would result in conversion factors ranging from 11  to  108,000
for estimating the number of fibers per nanogram.   Furthermore,  the majority
of health effects data are from occupational  exposures using fiber  number
concentrations.  Fiber size and shape are important factors in producing
tumors, with fibers less than 0.5 ym in diameter most active (126.).
     Asbestos fiber length has been considered important in initiating
fibrosis, but Selikoff and Lee (129.) pointed out that it cannot be said
with any confidence that fibrogenicity drops  to negligible proportions at
fiber lengths of 5 urn or 1 ym.  The authors speculated that smaller fibers may
also be responsible for fibrotic and mesotheliomatous reactions.  Other
confounding factors affecting disease induction include cigarette smoking
(129.).
     The available health effects data for developing dose-response curves
are available but in units of measure as particle counts and not mass  con-
centrations.  The dose response information is further limited in its
application since it was generated from health workers occupationally
exposed and not from continuous exposure to the general population.
     Asbestos has been reported to cause pulmonary fibrosis in wild and
domesticated animals living in the vicinity of asbestos mines or factories.
High concentrations are implied but dose-response information is not avail-
able (123.).
     Available information on the effects of asbestos to nonhuman organisms
is of recent origin and involves laboratory animals exposed to high dosages.
Physiological reactions in rats include formation of malignant neoplasms as
well as various gross morphological changes in the lung for chronic expo-
sures (2 years) to milled asbestos at approximately 49 mg/m3 (fiber concen-
tration of 0.08 to 1.82 percent).  Mice, gerbils, and guinea pigs exhibited
similar morphological changes, but no neoplasms were observed under similar
exposures (127.).
                                  15

-------
     As with man, the literature generally supports the assumption that
fiber length, fiber concentration, and chemical origin or type of asbestos
mineral influences the response of an organism exposed to asbestos.  In
fact, literature reporting asbestos exposure is infrequently reported in
yg/m3, but rather as fiber concentration or total "asbestos" concentration
including nonfibrous pseudomorphs and other allied chemical species.
Furthermore, the interconversion of these various types of measurements
is a technically difficult problem as explained above.  No information
was found concerning field-observed effects of asbestos on plants and
animals.

2.1.4  Fluorides

     The proposed de minimi's level for fluorides is 0.01 pg/m , 24-hour
average.  The health effects data in Table 2-3 relate to occupational and
community respiratory exposures to fluorides in or near aluminum smelters
and phosphate fertilizer plants.  The populations concerned were subject
to concomitant exposure to other compounds associated with the respective
industries.
     Many community studies have monitored dental fluorosis in children
as an evaluation of respiratory fluoride exposure.  Dental fluorosis, or
mottled enamel, is a result of functional changes preceding the eruption
of a tooth.  Consequently, chronic fluoride exposure will result in mottled
enamel in children under the age of five to eight years, but can be tolerated
without effects in adults.  Leloczky (109., cited in 136.), reported
                                                                          o
fewer dental caries than expected in children exposed to 0.03 to 0.06 mg/m
fluoride particulates in air.  Sadilova (185., cited in 136.) supported
this finding, but noted an increase in the incidence of mottled enamel in
children exposed to 0.03 to 0.56 mg/m3 in air.  Agate et al. (131., cited
in 136.), also observed fewer dental caries in children living near an
aluminum production plant, but noted a slight increase in very mild mottling
of tooth enamel  associated with respiratory exposure to 0.045 to 0.048 mg/m^
fluorides.
     Elkins (132.)  reported nosebleeds and sinus trouble in welders exposed
to 0.7 mg/m3 hydrogen fluoride.  Midttun (108., cited in 136.), observed
an allergic asthma  reaction of unknown etiology in aluminum plant workers

                                   16

-------
TABLE 2-3.  HEALTH/ECOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF POPULATIONS EXPOSED TO FLUORIDES IN AIR
Exposure
Concentration
0.54-0.66 ug/m3
0.55 i*/*3
0.64 ug/M3
0.76 ug/M3
0.98 ug/M3
1.6 ug/M3
2.0 ug/M3
4.3 ug/M3
4.7 ug/M3
5.0 ug/M3
B.2 pg/M3
Duration of
Exposure
Continuous
Continuous
Continuous
Continuous
40 days
Continuous
24 hr
Continuous
7 days
Continuous
Continuous
Continuous
Continuous
Continuous
Species
Corn (Zea mays)
Strawberry
Marshall Var.
Soybean
(Glyclne max)
Gladiolus, var.
Snow Princess
Ponderosa pine
(Plnus ponderosa)
Com (Zea mays)
Corn (Zea mays)
Oat (Avena
satlvaT
Sorghum
(Sorghum vulgare)
Wheat (Trltlcum
aestlvuil
Wheat (Trltlcum
aestlvunT)
Effects
HI Id leaf symptom; Chlorotlc streaking on tips
. and margins of leaves.
Achenes and underlying receptacle tissue at the
apical end of fruit did not develop.
Significant reduction In number of pods,
weight/seed, stem length, significant Increase
In dry weight of stems and leaves.
391 Increase In oxygen uptake over controls
(Increase In respiration). Necrosis.
Chlorosis of young needles.
A mean of 1.9S of total leaf area affected by
necrosis.
Seed production completely Inhibited.
Delay of maturation; significant Increase In
dry weight of stems and leaves.
851 reduction In seeds; 301 reduction In seed
weight (weight/seed); Increase In dry weight
of steins and leaves.
No significant difference from controls In seed
production, seed weight, dry stems and leaf
weight. Trace of leaf tip dleback noted after
10 weeks.
SOS reduction 1n number of seeds produced;
18X reduction In weight/seed; Decrease In
dry stem and leaves weight.
Reference
Pack and Sulzbach. 1976
(142.)
Pack, 1972 (141.)
Pack and Sulzbach. 1976
(1«.)
Hill, et al., 1959 (133.)
Adams, et al.. 1956 (130.)
Hitchcock, et al.. 1964
(134.)
Pack and Sulzbach. 1976
(142.)
Pack and Sulzbach. 1976
(142.)
Pack and Sulzbach. 1976
(142.)
Pack and Sulzbach, 1976
(142.)
Pack and Sulzbach. 1976
(142.)

-------
            TABLE 2-3.  HEALTH/ECOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF POPULATIONS  EXPOSED  TO  FLUORIDES  IN AIR  (continued)
Exposure
Concentration
10.4 gg/m3
40 ug/m
0.03-0.11 mg/m3
0.045-0.048 mg/m3
0.03-0.06 mg/m3
0.03-0.56 mg/m3
0.09-0.90 mg/m3
0.14 mg/m3
0.7 mg/m3
2.5 mg/m3
1-2 mg/m3
Duration of
Exposure
Continuous
Continuous
7 days
Single exposure
Community
exposure - continuous
Community
exposure -continuous
Community
exposure -continuous
Community
exposure -continuous
Community
exposure -continuous
6h
Occupational -
Aluminum plant
workers
Occupational -
Aluminum plant
workers
Species
Strawberry
Marshall var.
Soybean
(Gljfclne max)
Human
Human
Human
Human
Human
Human
Human
Human
Human
Effects
Severely restricted fruit development. Approxi-
mately 50" decrease in weiqht/frui t. Significant
reduction in percentage of flowers that developed
into fruit. Chlorosis of leaves; Marginal
necrosis.
Average of 34.3^ increase in respiration.
Perceptible odor concentration.
Slight increase — very mild mottling of tooth
enamel compared to control. Teeth of children
near plant appeared less prone to carles.
Children with slightly less carles than normal
and excreted <6.6 mg F/l in urine.
Incidence of mottled enamel: Exposed 31.0-
37. 5~. Control 2.1* Incidence of dental caries:
Exposed 10. 8-24. 5V Control 37.5"
Slight dental fluorosls -58*. Moderate dental
fluorosls - 8". Severe dental fluorosis - 1 "
No significant differences In clinical observa-
tions between exposed and control.
Welders exposure to AP-Nosebleeds .
Sinus trouble
Osteosclerosis
Nausea, headache. Irritation of conjunctiva and
respiratory passages. 54 cases allergic asthma
observed over 5 years, Mleroen unknown fluoride
compound. Concomitant exposure to organir tars,
dust t.nrne fluorides, HF . A1F . cryolit--. fll.,fl,.
502. ' _|
Reference
Pack. 107? (141.)
Yu and Miller, 1967 (149.)
National Institute for
Occupational Safety and
Health, 1976 (140.)
Haale. 1940 (131.),c1ted
in (136.)
Leloczky. 1970 (109.),
cited in (136.)
Sadllova, 1957 (185.),
cited in (136.)
Khyngln and Shamsutdfnova,
1970 (139.). cited In (136.)
Balazova, 1971 (212.. 223.)
Balazova, et al, 1970 (224.)
Hluchan, et al, 1968 (225.)
Balazova « Llpkova. 1974 (226.
Lezovic 4 Balazova, 1%9 (227.
cited in (136.)
Elkins, 1959 (132.)
Hodge and Smith, 1977 (13fi.)
Kaltreider, 197? (138.)
Midttun, I960 (108.),
cited in (136.)
CD

-------
exposed to 1 to 2 mg/m  particulate fluorides.   Nausea, headache,  irri-
tation of conjunctiva and respiratory passages  were also observed.   Hodge
and Smith (136.) and Kaltreider (138.) noted osteosclerosis in aluminum
plant workers exposed to 2.5 mg/m  fluoride particulates in air.
     Study of the health effects of exposure to low concentrations  of
atmospheric fluorides has centered on dental effects in children.   The
ability of fluorides to prevent dental caries has been noted;  indeed,
the addition of fluorides to drinking water is  recommended to  prevent
dental caries.
     The primary ecological effect of fluorides is on vegetation.   Gaseous
fluorides enter the leaves of vegetation primarily through the stomata, the
primary site of accumulation being leaf tips or margins (137.).  The visible
symptoms of fluoride toxicity vary according to the type of plant,  but seem
to be relatively consistent.  The initial  symptoms of most herbaceous plants
is chlorosis, starting at the leaf margins of elongating leaves; usually
this results in necrosis.  In many of the grasses including corn and sorghum,
chloritic flecks appear scattered at the tips and upper margins of  the middle-
aged leaves.
     Ponderosa pine is very susceptible to fluoride toxicity.   An atmospheric
exposure of 0.98 yg/m  for 24 hours produced chlorosis of the  immature
needles, which turned to a light brown or reddish brown at the tips.  This
discoloration may be interrupted by dark bands, which may indicate  inter-
mittent exposures (148.).
     The work of Pack (141.) and Pack and Sulzbach (142.) indicated that
damage to a plant may result before visible symptoms occur.  For example,
strawberry bushes grown in a continuous exposure to 5.0 yg/m  air  (hydrogen
fluoride) exhibited a significant decrease in fruit development and fruit
weight compared to controls, yet showed no signs of chlorosis  (141.).
     Animals are exposed to fluorides principally from ingesting contami-
nated forage or from feed supplements.  The most frequently encountered
symptoms are dental lesions.  In sheep, ingestion of 10,000 mg/m   fluorides
in water caused decreased wool production and dental lesions (143.).   Fluo-
rides added to feed at a concentration of 2.0 mg/kg caused slight mottling
                                   19

-------
and wear on the fourth incisor of dairy cattle (147.).   Stoddard et al.(145.)
fed dairy cattle 2.08 mg/kg of fluoride in feed (109 ppm) and found reduced
lactating ability but not a significant decrease in overall production
of milk.  When fed 1.17 mg/kg fluoride in feed (55ppm), reduced feed consump-
tion and reduced lactating ability were noted.  But again, there was no
significant decrease in total milk production (146.).
     One problem in a literature study is to generalize the results of
experiments in which fluorides added to feed or water are compared to
results where animals forage naturally contaminated feed.  Shupe et al.
(144.) fed groups of dairy heifers food supplemented with sodium fluoride
and calcium fluoride as well as the fluoride contaminated hay, and found
that the naturally contaminated hay was as toxic as the sodium fluoride
supplement.   In addition, Hobbs and Merriman (135.) found that hay contami-
nated with fluoride from an aluminum smelter was somewhat less toxic than
sodium fluoride supplemented food.
     There is evidence that a lag period may exist before physiological
expression of fluoride toxicity.  Suttie et al. (147.) found a two to five
year latent period between the time dental lesions were noted and the
development of other physiologic effects including depression of milk
production.  Thus, he suggests that fluoride toxicity is a function of
exposure (time) and amount of ingestion.

2.1.5  Sulfuric Acid Mist
                                                                   o
     The proposed de minimi's level for sulfuric acid^mist is 1 yg/m ,
24-hour average.  A comprehensive review of the human health effects from
sulfuric acid mist published by the National  Institute for Occupational
Safety and Health (NIOSH) was the source for much of the effects data
described below (162.).
     The reported health effects from respiratory exposure to low concen-
trations (Table 2-4)  report different effects as explained in the following
narrative.
                                    20

-------
            TABLE  2-4.   HEALTH/ECOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF POPULATIONS EXPOSED TO SULFURIC ACID MIST IN AIR
ro
Concentration
(mg/m3)
0.07 0.1 um dli
0.1 0.3 \m dla I
0.12 0.7 um dial
0.07 1.0 um dial
0.22 2.5 um dla
0.35
0.4
0.5
0.6-0.85
0.8-16.6
2.9
>4.0 (0.6. 0.9. and
9.0 um dua)
8 (-1 umdla)
20
20
87-1600
(<2 um dla)
Duration
1 hr
5-15 mln
10 sec
5-14 days
Unknown
Occupational
60 m1n
18-140 days
8-72 days
7 hr/day
for 13 days
7 hr/day
for 9 days
NA
Species
Guinea pig
Human
Human
Guinea pig
Human
Human
Human
Guinea pig
Guinea pig
Rabbit (New
Zealand white)
CF-1 mice
Rabbit
Rat
House
Guinea pig
tffects
Increase pulmonary flow resistance
percentage: 32
41
43
14
18
Increased respiration rate, decreased maxi-
mum Insplratory and expiratory air flow
Conditioning of electrocortlcal reflex
Slight lung Irritation
Perception of odor and Irritation of mucosa
Etching of dental enamel
Coughing, some bronchoconstrictlon rales
Greatest pulmonary pathology occurred at
0.9 |im diameter exposure; foci of pulmonary
damage changed with varying particle size.
Increased time of exposure did not increase
mortality; suggests concentration more
Important than duration.
Slight maternal toxicity (none at 5 mg/m );
no teratoqenicity or fetal toxicity
Same as above
Species sensitivity to HjSO^ particles
compared; sensitivity increases: Rabbit
< Rat • Mice < Guinea piq
Reference
Amdur, et al., 1975
(151.)
Amdur. et al., 1952
(153.)
Lewis, et al.. 1972
(158.)
Bushtueva. 1962 (155.)
Lewis, et al., 1972 (158.)
Halcolm and Paul. 1961
(159.)
Sim and Pattle. 1957
(166.)
Thomas, et al.. 1958
(168.)
Amdur, et al., 1952
(15Z.)
Hurray, et al . . 1979
(161.)
Treon, et al., 1950
(221.)

-------
          TABLE 2-4.   HEALTH/ECOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF  POPULATIONS EXPOSED TO SULFURIC  ACID MIST IN AIR (continued)
      Concentration
centratl
(mg/m3)
                              Duration
     Species
                 Effects
                                                                                                                            Reference
ro
r>o
   OTHER MEASUREMENTS
    ph 3.2, 0.9 mm drop
    size
    1.7 vm aerodynamic
    diameter of 18 M
    sulfurlc add
                   6 days/wk
                   10 hrs/day
                   for 14 days
Halo blight on
kidney beans

Fusiform rust on
willow oak

Kidney beans
4- to 6-wk-old
soybean seedlings
Pathogen" Inhibition (varying  percent related
related to  life cycle stage)

Pathogen Inhibition (86 percent)


SEM observed extensive erosion of cuticular
waxes (therefore, 3.2 pH may  Inhibit host
invasion but cuticular erosion leaves plant
more susceptible to invasion  post exposure).

None observed with scanning electron
microscope  or human eye
Shriner,  1977 (165.)
Wedding, et al., 1979
(170.)

-------
     The health effects from respiratory exposure to sulfuric acid mist
include irritant effects on mucous membranes and chemical corrosion of
dental enamel.  Amdur et al.  (153.) reported changes in respiratory rates
                                               3
and respiratory flow from exposure to 0.35 mg/m .  The exposure tests were
conducted on human volunteers of various ages.  The authors noted that
asthmatics, cardiac patients, and other less healthy persons in the
general population may be more susceptible to sulfuric acid mist exposure.
NIOSH (162.) reported similar results by Morando (160.), but questioned
the validity of the findings  at these concentrations.   Sackner et al.
(164.) supported the NIOSH conclusions showing no respiratory resistance
                                                   3
at sulfuric acid concentrations of 0.01 to 1.0 mg/m .   Toyama and Nakamura
(169., cited  in 162.) demonstrated pulmonary airway resistance in humans
at exposures of 0.01 to 0.1 mg/m , but concluded that concomitant hydrogen
peroxide and sulfur dioxide exposure had produced a synergistic effect.
     Earlier, Lewis et al. (158.) extensively reported the sensory and
central nervous system studies in the USSR and noted conditioned reflex
responses and perception and  irritation thresholds in humans exposed to
                                                      3
atmospheric concentrations of 0.4 and 0.6 to 0.85 mg/m , respectively.
Malcolm and Paul (159.) reported etching of dental enamel from occupational
                             3
exposures to 0.8 to 16.6 mg/m  sulfuric acid mist.  Other studies have noted
etching of dental  enamel but  accurate monitoring measurements were lacking
(167., 154.).
     NIOSH (162.)  also noted  one study by Raule (163.) which reported worker
acclimation to inhalation of sulfuric acid mist.  Conversely, Sim and
Rattle (166.) noted long-lasting bronchitic symptoms in two male volunteers.
Contradictions of effects at  similar concentrations may be due to variance
in relative humidity, temperature, and particle size (150., 156., 162., 166.).
     On the other hand, it must be remembered that all studies described
above were either occupational or human volunteer studies of health persons.
It is possible, as noted by Amdur et al. (153.), that less healthy persons
in the general population may be more susceptible to sulfuric acid mist
exposures.  Epidemiological studies to support this relationship and identify
a dose-response relationship  are lacking.
                                   23

-------
     From the viewpoint of nonhuman effects, there has been extensive
testing of the effects of sulfuric acid aerosol exposure on laboratory
animals and on selected plant species; however, the lowest known value
reported in the literature as having a biological effect is 0.07 mg/m
(151.).
     In Table 2-4 selected literature references for acute or chronic
biological effects of sulfuric acid aerosol are presented.  Damage from
sulfuric acid aerosol is species-specific (221.).  Particle size has a
major  influence on both the degree of damage and the specific places of
damage in the pulmonary system (168., 151.).  However, insufficient information
is  available to establish a lower limit of effect.  Because of the powerful
hygroscopic nature of concentrated sulfuric acid, it is likely that any
exposure results in some effect on biological tissues (157.).
     Waxy coatings on many plants are somewhat protective, though erosion
of  these layers begins with initial exposure to sulfuric acid (170., 171., 172.).
Increased exposures result in tissue damage from drying, heating, and
charring.  On the other hand, sulfuric acid aerosol exposure appears to be
associated with a slight increase in resistance to parasite attack, probably
the result of either damage to the parasite or substrate changes which, in turn,
do  not provide favorable conditions for the parasite/host relationship (165.).

2.1.6  Vinyl Chloride

     The proposed de minimi's level for vinyl chloride is 1 pg/m, maximum
value.  Toxicological experience with this compound came as a result of
occupational health studies which identified an excess incidence of angio-
sarcoma of the liver in vinyl chloride workers (175.).  Vinyl chloride was
previously considered non-toxic and therefore exposure was not of-great
concern.   Consequently, adequate personal monitoring data do not exist
to allow an accurate estimate of worker exposure and cancer risk.
     Several researchers have correlated length of exposure measured as
years of work in vinyl chloride plants to occupational diseases including
angiosarcoma of the liver (174., 175., 184.), respiratory and brain cancers,
cancer of other unspecified sites, and chromosome aberrations (177.).
                                  24

-------
Other health effects observed include nervous manifestations (euphoria),
cardiovascular manifestations (arterial hypertension), Raynaud's syndrome
(abnormal sensitivity to cold), digestive problems (hepatomegaly), respira-
tory manifestations, skin irritations, endocrine alteration, hematologic
changes, and bone changes (acroosteolysis) (179., 180., 183., 186.).
     Several community epidemiological studies have been conducted to
correlate proximity to a production facility and various health effects.
For example, Infante (178.) noted an excessive number of congenital malfor-
mations in communities with polyvinyl chloride production facilities.
Ambient concentrations of vinyl chloride during the study period were
not given; therefore, no association between vinyl chloride exposure
and congenital malformations can be stated.
     Edmonds et al. (176.) conducted a community case-control study of the
possible relationship between congenital central nervous system malforma-
tions and exposure to vinyl chloride monomer emissions from a local plant.
Although central nervous system malformations were significantly higher
than the United States rates, no correlation was found with occupation of
parent or residential proximity to the plant site.  The authors suggest
that vinyl chloride may be one of several pollutants emitted from nearby
plants which may be responsible for the high rates.
     NIOSH (181.) concluded that there is probably no threshold for car-
cinogenesis from vinyl chloride exposure, although it is possible that at
very low concentrations the latency period may be extended beyond the life
expectancy.  This implies that setting a low enough exposure level for
vinyl chloride may decrease cancer incidence, but data thus far have come
from healthy workers occupationally exposed 8 hours per day.  Thus, setting
a safe level for persons not occupationally exposed must consider those
most susceptible to disease.
     Basuk and Nichols (173.) best summarized the vinyl chloride data by
stating that because of the extremely high vinyl chloride concentrations in
plants with little or no reliable monitoring facilities, because of personnel
turnover and lack of medical records and because of unknown effects of other
contaminants used in the process which may be carcinogenic, it is impossible
                                   25

-------
to determine the shape of the hunan dose-response curves except in a
rough qualitative manner.
     The relatively recent understanding of the hazard of vinyl chloride
to man has resulted in studies using laboratory animals to establish
dose-response relationships.  Early testing at exposures assumed to be
at nontoxic levels has resulted in carcinogenesis.  It is believed that
subsequent testing has been conducted at lower levels, but these findings
have apparently not reached the open literature, and, consequently, are
not accessible.
     Vinyl chloride is carcinogenic in a number of laboratory species
including mice, rats, and hamsters.  Mammary carcinomas can be induced
in laboratory animals by exposure to one ppm or  less  of vinyl chloride
(173.).  Repeated daily exposures in both rats and mice at 50 ppm are
carcinogenic (187.).  Also, incidence of angiosarcoma and nephroblastomas
appear to be dose related in the lower range of exposures (182.).
     Information is not available on either chronic or acute effects of
exposure of vinyl chlorfde to natural populations.

2.1.7  Hydrogen Sulfide

     The proposed de minimi's level for hydrogen sulfide is one yg/m3, one-hour
average.  Much of the available health effects data for hydrogen sulfide were
derived from acute occupational exposure studies of concentrations greater
than five mg/m3 (see Table 2-5).  Community studies of hydrogen sulfide exposure
have also been reported but exposures were much higher than the de minimis
levels.  Thus, the major effects at the de minimi's concentrations are psycho-
physical responses to odors.
     The odor threshold has been variably reported at one to 45 yg/m
by Miner (192.) and 0.65 yg/m  by Leonardos et al. (191.).  Differences in
odor thresholds can be explained by variations in the methods and statis-
tical analyses used to determine the threshold level and inherent variation
in the study population (193.).  The National Research Council (193.) reviewed
the psychophysical factors of hydrogen sulfide exposure and concluded that
one cannot depend on adaptation to reduce awareness of odorous pollution.
The National Research Council noted that sociological factors (such as age,
                                   26

-------
             TABLE  2-5.   HEALTH/ECOLOGICAL  EFFECTS OF  POPULATIONS EXPOSED TO HYDROGEN SULFIDE IN AIR
Exposure
loncentrailon,
V9/*F
1-45
18
42
400
420
420

420
5,000
10.000
15.000
15.000
28.000
28.000
Duration of
Exposure
—
12 hr/d
3 months
Continuous
2 months
Continuous
Continuous

Continuous
Unknown
12 hr/d
3 months
6-7 hr
5d
90d
8 hr/d
Species
Human
Rat
Sugarbeet
Lettuce
Human
Ponderosa
pine
Seedless
grape
Alfalfa
Human
Rat
Human
Mouse
Monkey
Human
Effects
Odor Threshold
Motor chronaxle abnormalities
Increased yield
Community exposure -Terre Haute. Indiana.
Nausea, loss of sleep, abrupt awakening,
breathlessness. H?S range 30-11000 yg/m3
Tip burn visible after 8 weeks
Detectable damage, lesions on leaves

Successive harvests showed yield reduction
Occupational exposure. Conjunctlval and
corneal Irritation. Concomitant CSj
expoAute. H2S range 5,000-20,000 ug/m3
M11d Irritation of tracheal, broncheal
mucosa, lower weight gain, motor
chronaxle abnormalities, abnormal
cerebral cortex dendrites.
Occupational exposure. Eye Irritation
Anorexia
Weight loss, Increased blood amylase
and alkaline phosphatase activities
Occupational exposure. Fatigue,
decreased libido, anorexia, dizziness,
eye and respiratory tract Irritation.
Reference
Miner, 1969 (192.)
Duan, 1959 (189.)
Natl. Res. Council. 1979
(193.)
Illinois Institute for Env.
Quality, 1974 (190.)
Natl. Res. Council, 1979
(193.)
As above (193.)

As above (193.)
Masure, 1950, (228.). cited In (193.)
Duan. 1959 (189.)
Nesswetha, 1969 (229^c1ted In (194.)
Hays, 1972. (230.). cited 1n (194.)
Sandage. 1961 (195), cited In (194.)
Ahlborg. 1951 (188.)
ro

-------
sex, and socioeconomic status)  affect odor complaints.   They concluded
there is no evidence that the experience of malodor per se produces
disease but noted that poor health  may increase the displeasure or at
least the frequency of complaints about odors.
     Community exposure studies in  Terre Haute, Indiana conducted by
the Illinois Institute for Environmental  Quality (190.), observed various
psychological disturbances from atmospheric hydrogen sulfide concentra-
tions of 400 yg/m3.  Nausea, loss of sleep, abrupt awakening, breathless-
ness, headaches, abdominal cramps,  diarrhea, choking, coughing, eye
irritation and acute asthma attacks were described.  The Institute suggested
that low concentrations of hydrogen sulfide posed special  dangers to indi-
viduals with heart or lung disease  (190,, 228., cited in 193.).
     Studies of occupational exposure have generally concentrated on
effects at levels greater than 5000 yg/m .  Health effects from occupa-
tional exposures included eye and respiratory tract irritation and brain
damage.  The existence of a discrete clinical chronic poisoning from
hydrogen sulfide has been questioned (194., 193.), with some indication
that the chronic poisonings are actually recurring acute or subacute
toxic exposures.
     Acute effects have not been included in Table 2-5 since these
effects occur at concentrations greater than 700 mg/m .  At such concen-
trations, respiratory distress, nervous system effects, and eventual
paralysis of breathing occur (194.).
     The environmental effects of hydrogen sulfide', as assessed through
laboratory experiments, are both varied and species specific.  At low
levels (4 yg/m  in air) continuous  exposure produced an increased yield
on sugar beets and lettuce (193.).   Concentrations an order of magnitude
higher, however, caused tip burn on ponderosa pine, and lesions on the
leaves of seedless grapes (193.).   Effects on animals show UD with concen-
trations in the 10,000 yg/m  range  and above.  Symptoms range from mild
irritation of trachea and broncheal mucosa to anorexia and weight loss.
                                   28

-------
2.1.8  Methyl Mercaptan

     The proposed de minimis level for methyl mercaptan is 0.5 yg/m , one-hour
average.  Toxicological data are limited to a few cases.
     Shults et al. (198.) described an acute respiratory exposure to
methyl mercaptan (methanethiol) in a 53 year old black male.  The worker
was engaged in salvaging metal  cylinders and was instructed to empty
tanks containing methyl mercaptan.  The worker was presumably exposed
to high atmospheric concentrations of the compound, although personal
monitoring was not available.  Acute, severe hemolytic anemia and methe-
moglobinemia developed.  Deep coma persisted and the victim died 28 days
after exposure.  The authors concluded that the likely mechanism of the
hemolysis was an oxidant effect of methyl mercaptan in a person deficient
in erythrocytic glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G-6-PD), an inherited
deficiency.
     Fairchild and Stokinger (196.) and Key et al. (197.) described local
and systemic effects in humans from respiratory exposure to methyl
mercaptan.  Observed effects included irriation of skin, eyes, and mucous
membranes.  The toxic effect of methyl mercaptan is similar to that of
hydrogen sulfide with central nervous system depression resulting in
respiratory paralysis.  Although personal exposure data and ambient
measurements of methyl mercaptan were not given, the above effects probably
occur at excessive levels, several orders of magnitude higher than the pro-
posed de minimi's level.
     Leonardos et al. (191.) reported an odor threshold for methyl  mercap-
tan of 0.0021 ppm (4.1 ug/m3).   Verschueren (199.) reported a threshold
odor concentration of 0.044 yg/m3.  The differences in the two odor threshold
values reported may be explained by methods of study, sensitivity of observers
to the odor, and different types of odor thresholds reported.  For example,
the study by Leonardos et al. (191.) reported an odor threshold which can be
recognized by all panel members (Population Identification Threshold 100
percent) whereas the value reported by Verschueren (199.) was an absolute
perception threshold.
                                  29

-------
     Available information on the toxic effects of methyl  mercaptan on
nonhumans is limited to a few high dosage experimental  animal studies.
The concentration which caused 50 percent of experimental  rats to become
comatose was determined to be 0.16 percent by volume (200.).  The concen-
tration of methyl mercaptan lethal to rats after 10 to 20 minutes exposure
was determined to be 1.0 percent by volume (231.).

2.1.9  Dimethyl Sulfide
                                                                   3
     The proposed de minimi's level for dimethyl sulfide is 0.5 yg/m ,
one-hour average.  This level was established primarily to control odors.
Specific information on the human health effects of dimethyl sulfide were
not found in the available literature.  The following discussion deals with
the odor properties of the compound.
     Leonardos et al. (191.) reported an odor threshold of 0.001 ppm (2.6
pg/m3) for dimethyl sulfide.  Verschueren (199.) reported an absolute per-
ceptible limit of 0.4 ppb (1.0 ug/m3).
     Dimethyl sulfide is one of four total reduced sulfur (TRS) compounds
for which de minimi's levels were proposed.  These TRS compounds are charac-
terized as highly odorous, generally considered repugnant or malodorous.
The National Research Council (218.) noted physiologic and morphologic
changes occur in animals from exposure to odorants.  These effects are
different from toxic effects.  Similar manifestations from exposure to
odorous pollutants are suggested in humans.  The Council noted that the
impact of these changes on human health has yet to be established, but
warrant immediate study.
     No information was available in the immediate literature concerning
field-observed effects of dimethyl sulfide on nonhumans.  Only data on
high dosage, experimental animal studies were available.  Ljunggren and
Norberg (231.) state that a 5.4 percent by volume concentration (140,000
    o
mg/m ) of dimethyl sulfide is lethal to rats after a 10 to 20 minute
exposure.  Zieve et al. (200.) report that the inhalation dose at which
                                                                         o
50 percent of rats become comatose is 9.6 percent by volume  (243,040 mg/m ),
                                   30

-------
2.1.10 Dimethyl Dlsulfide

     The proposed de minimi's level for dimethyl disulfide is 2 yg/m3, one-
hour average.  This level was established primarily to control odors.
Toxicological information for dimethyl disulfide is sparse, with only
limited short-term studies on animals and no data for human health effects
available.  Thus, the discussion will be limited to the odor properties
of the compound.
     Verschueren (199.) reported two different odor thresholds for dimethyl
disulfide:  a threshold odor concentration of 0.005 mg/m  and a 50 percent
recognition threshold of 5.6 ppb (21.5 yg/m ).  Berglund (219.) studied
the effects of sulfurous compound mixtures on odor intensity and noted
additive and interactive components of mixtures.  For example, a field
investigation of a pulp mill indicated that selective elimination of
several sulfur compounds including dimethyl  disulfide would not necessarily
reduce the odor strength of the effluent.  Indeed, the author noted that a
slight increase in odor intensity may result from selective elimination of
hydrogen sulfide, methyl mercaptan, dimethyl disulfide, and dimethyl
sulfide.
     Dimethyl disulfide is a naturally occurring compound produced from
aerobic or anaerobic activity in soils and organic matter (232., 233.,
234.).  Dimethyl disulfide residues have been confirmed in human blood,
urine, and respiratory gas (235., 236., 237.).  Gage (238.) reported
symptoms of lethargy, respiratory difficulties, and low weight gain in
rats exposed to 250 ppm dimethyl disulfide in air.  Respiratory exposure
to 100 ppm dimethyl disulfide did not elicit a toxic reaction, after six-
hours exposure. Kadota and Ishida (234.) reported inhibition of Aphanomyces
euteiches (Pea root rot) at dimethyl disulfide concentrations as low as 20 ppm.

2.1.11  Carbon Disulfide
                                                                   3
     The proposed de minimis value for carbon disulfide is 200 yg/m , one-hour
average.  Toxicological experience with carbon disulfide in humans has been
limited to occupational exposures in the viscose rayon industry where con-
comitant exposure to hydrogen sulfide occurs.  A comprehensive review of
human health effects from respiratory exposure to carbon disulfide published

                                  31

-------
               TABLE 2-6.   HEALTH/ECOLOGICAL  EFFECTS  OF  POPULATION EXPOSED TO CARBON DISULFIDE  IN  AIR
   Exposure
Concentration,
   (mg/m3)
     Duration of
       Exposure
Species
                      Effects
                                                                           Reference
     0.08


     0.09

     0.65
     1.0
     0.1
   1.5-4.2

     3-10


      9


     9-50


      10


      10

      15
10-15 minutes


10 minutes
160 d
Unknown

9 months
Occupational exposure

0.5-30 years
Occupational exposure

4+ years
Occupational exposure

Occupational exposure
Occupational exposure

Occupational exposure
Human


Human

Human
Carbon Disulflde Alone


    Disturbed  rate of execution of assigned  motor
    responses

    CMS effects - visual center of brain

    Odor threshold
                                                    Carbon Disulflde and Other Chemicals
Rat




Human

Human


Human


Human


Human


Human

Human
    Inflammation of bronchi, weight changes.
    Increased  serum aspartate amino-transferase
    and blood  chollnesterase.  Most severe with
    concomitant exposures.

    Increase In color and light sensitivity

    Hypotension; nervous system excitability
    Retinal  degeneration; conjunctiva! inflamma-
    tion; color-vision disturbances

    Inmunologlc abnormalities
    Adverse effects-menstruation and pregnancy
    in exposed workers

    Increased digestive  tract diseases

    Muscular power diminished, reflexes slowed
Boklna, et al.,  1976  (206.)


Boklna, et al.,  1979  (205.)

Leonardos, et al., 1969 (191.
M1s1ak1ew1cz, et al.,  1972
(209.), cited 1n (211.).
Gabovich, et al., 1978 (210.)

Kramarenko, et al., 1971
(240.),cited In (211.)

Szymankowa, 1968, (213.),
cited In (211.)

Kashln, 1965 (241.). cited
In (211.).

Agadzhanova, 1978 (203.)
Gabovich, et al., 1975 (210.)

Vasllescu. 1972, (239.),
cited  In (211.).
       Concomitant exposure to hydrogen sulflde; see text  for  limitations of this study.

-------
by the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (211.) was
relied upon for much of the effects data described below.  Carbon di-
sulfide exposure has produced health effects in the cardiovascular,
neurologic, and reproductive systems and in the eye (Table 2-6).
     The odor threshold for carbon disulfide is 0.21 ppm (0.65
    2
mg/m ) by Leonardos et al.  (191.), but has been reported as low as 0.08
mg/m3 by Baikov (127) cited in (201.).  Lindvall (208.) noted that a con-
comitant exposure to hydrogen sulfide, nitric oxide, and acid fumes increa-
sed the human sensitivity to carbon disulfide.  Studies by Berglund (219.)
emphasized this finding, noting that exposure to a mixture of sulfur compounds
will alter the psychophysical response to the odor.  The National Research
Council (218.) emphasized the adverse public response to odors of sulfurous
compounds and suggested setting acceptable odor limits for compounds other
than hydrogen sulfide at ten times the odor threshold.
     The lowest concentration eliciting a response to carbon disulfide
gas was documented by Bokina et al. (206.).  Human volunteers exposed to
0.08 mg/m  exhibited disturbed rates of motor responses.  Bokina et al.
(205.) later described central nervous system effects on the visual center
of the brain from exposure to 0.9 mg/m  carbon disulfide.
     Much of the remaining health effects data presented in Table 2-6
were published by Russian and Eastern European authors who have studied
protective and adaptive reactions of carbon disulfide on humans.
Kramarenko (240., cited in 211.) observed hypotension and nervous system
excitability in viscose rayon workers exposed to three to ten mg/m3 carbon
disulfide in workroom air.   Kashin (241., cited in 211.) described
immunologic abnormalities in viscose rayon workers exposed to ten to 50 mg/m
carbon disulfide in air.  Agadzhanova (203.) described adverse effects on
menstrual function and pregnancy in female rayon workers exposed to ten mg/m^
in workroom air.  Petrov (242.) cited in (211.), noted an increased risk of
spontaneous abortions in female rayon workers exposed to atmospheric concen-
trations of 27 mg/m3 carbon disulfide for three plus years.  Cardiovascular
effects were reported by Gavrilescu and Lilis (243., cited in 211.) in
rayon workers exposed for ten years to 20 to 42 mg/m3 carbon disulfide  in
workroom air.  Arteriosclerotic changes and arterial hypertension were also
observed.
                                   33

-------
     Dose response information for carbon disulfide in nonhuman
populations is difficult to elucidate, as no published studies of
this nature are immediately available.
     Laboratory animal studies have been conducted because of the need
to better understand the human effects.  Respiratory exposure levels
have been approximately 1000 mg/m3.  The most frequently occurring effects
at this dosage are lethargy and loss of motor control.  Effects on repro-
ductive success have also been noted.  The relatively new technique of
behavioral toxicology has been used to help assess the effects of carbon
disulfide (207., 216., 217.).  Respiratory exposure to the carbon disulfide
affected the operant behavior in pigeons and the aversive threshold in
squirrel monkeys.
     Some authors (204., 209., 214., 215.) have reported a synergistic
effect from exposure to a mixture of carbon disulfide and hydrogen sulfide
at levels three orders of magnitude lower than those previously encountered.
The possibility of a toxic synergism with these gases is indicated but
this type of relationship is hard to confirm.  The studies of synergistic
effects have definite weaknesses, including the lack of proper controls,
insufficient numbers of subjects, lack of statistical reliability and
lack of a sufficiently detailed explanation as to procedure and results
(211.).  These results are of limited reliability.

2.1.12  Carbonyl Sulfide

     The proposed de minimi's value for carbonyl sulfide is 200 yg/m3, one-hour
average.  Experience with human exposures to carbonyl sulfide is lacking.
The review of available literature did not reveal any definitive studies of
biological responses to carbonyl sulfide.  Therefore, human and ecological
effects data are not reported in tabular form.  The information presented
below describes the available information on carbonyl sulfide.  Available
information on odor properties of carbonyl sulfide is also described.
                                  34

-------
     Peyton et al. (201.) concluded that carbonyl sulfide and carbon
disulfide (see Section 2.1.11) may produce similar effects due to the
similar physical and chemical properties.  The authors estimated the
relative toxicity of carbon disulfide to carbonyl sulfide is a ratio
of 2:1 based on the additional sulfur radical on carbon disulfide.
                                                     o
They recommended an ambient concentration of 400 yg/m .  The National
Research Council (193.) concluded that the toxic effect of carbon
disulfide was attributed to metabolism to carbonyl sulfide and an
unknown form of sulfur.  Thus the effects of carbonyl sulfide exposure
may be similar to those observed in carbon disulfide exposure.  As
noted previously (Section 2.1.11), the available data on human effects
from carbon disulfide are confounded by the concomitant exposure of
hydrogen sulfide.  Thus, although the compounds may react similarly in
humans, the effects are still uncertain.
     The de minimi's level of 200 yg/m  for carbonyl sulfide was
established primarily to control odors.  An odor threshold for carbonyl
sulfide was not identified.  Wostradowski et al. (202.) reported on
carbonyl sulfide research involving Kraft recovery furnaces and con-
cluded that carbonyl sulfide present in concentrations of one to 30 ppm
               q
(2.4 to 74 mg/m ) in flue gas does not significantly contribute to the
odor problem.  Berglund (219.) in a field investigation of a Kraft pulp
mill noted that selective elimination of all the known odorants (hydrogen
sulfide, methyl mercaptan, dimethyl sulfide, dimethyl, disulfide) would
not necessarily reduce the odor strength of the emission.  The same may
also apply to carbonyl sulfide as supported by Worstradowski et al. (202.),

2.2  ECOSYSTEM EFFECTS
     No studies of ecosystem effects of the twelve substances were
available in the literature consulted for this study.  More exhaustive
searches and, especially, interpretation and synthesis of diverse informa-
tion would be required to elucidate this type of effect.  More research
could possibly produce, for example, observations on changes in species
diversity in the presence of mercury.  Other searches and interpretations
                                    35

-------
would develop knowledge of the effect of fluorides on overall plant or
primary productivity.
     However, it is expected that information on ecosystem effects will
be sparse.  Only recently has the need been recognized for studies of this
type.  Consequently, there is not a large body of published knowledge in
world literature.   Ecosystem parameters, in the absolute sense, are
more difficult and costly to measure than toxicological  studies using small
populations, as reported in Sections 2.1.1 through 2.1.11.
                                   36

-------
                          3.  NATIONAL EMISSIONS

     For the purpose of evaluating the significance of SCCP emissions, a
nationwide emission inventory of the pollutants subject to de mini mis
guidelines for both SCCP and non-SCCP sources is presented in Tables 3-1
through 3-5.  A comparison of SCCP versus non-SCCP emissions is presented
in Table 3-6.  All emission data are for 1974, the most recent year for
which information is available.  This information is not complete and blanks
in the tables indicate where no data were found.  Values shown for column
totals represent the sums of the reported data, not estimated total emis-
sions.
         s
3.1  TRACE ELEMENTS
     Table 3-1 summarizes 1974 national SCCP emissions of trace elements (mer-
cury, beryllium and fluorides).  Of the SCCP source categories, Electricity
Generation and Industrial Combustion Processes produce the greatest amounts
of trace element emissions.  Combustion of coal  for electricity generation
produces over 50 percent of the total mass of emissions for each of the
three trace elements.
     Non-SCCP sources  include industrial  processing and waste incineration
(see Table  3-2.).   Few industrial  sources emit beryllium at rates of 100
kg/yr or greater.   Fluorides are emitted from several  industrial categories,
including those associated with ceramic manufacture, phosphorus-based
products, and primary metals.  Electrolytic production of chlorine generates
the largest amount of mercury.
     Overall, emissions of beryllium and fluorides from SCCP sources are
significantly higher than from non-SCCP-  SCCP sources generate nearly all
of the beryllium emissions and over 40 percent of fluorides.  However, non-
SCCP sources generate approximately 75 percent of mercury emissions.
3.2  ASBESTOS
     Table 3-3. summarizes national emissions of asbestos,  Non-SCCP sources
for asbestos emissions are reported in the available data; SCCP source
emission are not.  The most important non-SCCP sources of asbestos emissions
are the production and processing of asbestos.  Asbestos production accounts
for approximately 75 percent of the total asbestos emisssions nationally.
                                     37

-------
                               TABLE  3-1.   1974  NATIONAL  EMISSIONS  OF TRACE  ELEMENTS  FROM SCCP
Source Category
Bituminous Coal
Pulverized Dry Bottom
Pulverized Het Bottom
Cyclone
Stoker
Anthracite
Stoker
Pulverized Dry Bottom
Lignite
Pulverized Dry Bottom
Pulverized Wet Bottom
Cyclone
Stoker
Residual 011
Other fired
Tangent lally fired
Electricity Generation
External Combustion
(1000 kg/yr)
Mercury Beryllium Fluorides

30.9 1*5.0 19,996.0
5.7 27.1 3.716.4
5.7 27. 1 3,716.4
0.3 1.4 190.2

0.2 0.6 90.9
0.1 0.3 50.9

0.4
0.1
0.1
0.1

0.7 3.8 0.2
0.5 2.4 0.1
Industrial
External Combustion
(1000 kg/yr)
Mercury Beryl Hum Fluorides

1.4 0.7 2,129.3
0.7 1.5 418.1
0.2 0.1 126.9
2.5 8.0 1.6Z9.6

0.1 0.1 53.5

0.1

0.5 2.3 0.1
0.1 0.4 0.0
Commercial/Institutional
External Combustion
(1000 kg/yr)
Mercury Beryllium Fluorides

0.1 1.6 53.7
0.0 0.1 1.9
0.4 39.0 90.8

0.5 0.3 308.5



0.6 2.5 0.1
0.0 0.0 0.0
Residential
External Combustion
(1000 kg/yr)
Mercury Beryllium Fluorides
0.0 0.3 13.8

0.0 0.0 0.5

-'



CO
CO
           Source:  Elmutls, et al., 1978(66.)

-------
TABLE 3-2.  1974 NATIONAL EMISSIONS OF TRACE ELEMENTS FROM NON-SCCP
Source Category
NON-SCCP SOURCES
Industrial Processes
Cement
Brick Tile Kilns and Dryers
Refractories
Phosphorus - Elemental
Phosphoric Acid - Wet Process
Phosphate Rock Drying, Grinding,
Calcinating
Primary Copper Smelting
Vitreous Kaolin Products
Flat Glass, Pressed and Blown Glass,
and Glass Containers
Mineral Wool
Primary Lead Smelting and Refining
Primary Zinc Smelting
Triple Superphosphates
Ammonium Phosphates
A1 iimi ntim Fl iinv*i_Hp
f\ 1 Ufri 1 1 1 till I r rwW r— t-MC
Calcium Phosphate
Other Fluoride Sources
Electrolytic Production of Chlorine
Potassium Hydroxide
Carbon Black Furnace
Municipal Incineration
Incineration of Type '2' Waste
Sewage Sludge Incineration
Coal Refuse Piles, Outcrops and
abandoned mines
TOTAL NON-SCCP EMISSIONS
Emissions in 1000 kg/yr
Mercury





















137.2
3.2
0.2
7.6
0.9
0.5

0.1
150.0
Beryllium


0.1




















0.0
0.2
0.0
0.0


0.3
Fl uori des


239.5
5679.8
3408.8
2904.5
1734.3

748.1
542.9
448.3

340.8
204.1
181.2
180.9
162.7
120.3
94.5
80.7
271.8








17300.0
Data Source:  Eimutis, et al, 1978(66.).
                                 39

-------
       TABLE 3-3.   1974  NATIONAL EMISSIONS OF ASBESTOS
         Source  Category
Asbestos (1000 kg/yr)
          SCCP Sources
        Non-SCCP Sources
Industrial Processes
  Asbestos Products
  Spinning Asbestos  Fibres,Twist-
    ing and Winding
  Preparation of Asbestos  Fibres
  Carding Asbestos  Fibres
  Combing Asbestos  Fibres
  Manufacture of Asbestos  Products,
    Weaving

  TOTAL ASBESTOS EMISSIONS
        485.3

         65.2
         37.8
         27.5
         27.5
         13.7

        657.0
   NA means  no information available.
  Data Source:  Eimutis, et al,  1978(66.).
                            40

-------
                                                            mist for SCCP
aruL ^^SfiflLJjfflmffjfi	JS^q0^*.:.^,5"1 f»*•*r acid emissions we re list i ma ted "By*
applying'the emission  factors in Table 4-6 to a nationwide inventory of
total sulfur oxide emissions (reported as $02) from Reference 56.
     SCCP sources generate approximately 96 percent of all  sulfuric acid
emissions.  Of the SCCP sources, coal  combustion by the electric utility
sector generates the largest percentage of sulfuric acid emissions.   This
is due to the large quantity of fuel consumed as well  as the high sulfur
content of coal.  Industrial combustion is less significant than the Elec-
tric Utility sector because of the difference in fuels, fuel  consumption,
and capacity of combustion systems.   The Commercial/Institutional and Resi-
dential sectors contribute approximately 26 percent of sulfuric acid emis-
sions from SCCP sources.   Ninety-four percent of these emissions are from
oil combustion.
     Emissions  from non-SCCP sources are primarily from industrial process-
ing.  The production of sulfuric acid accounts for over half of these
emissions, and  brick and tile kilns and dryers contribute approximately
39  percent.
3.4  VINYL CHLORIDE
     Table 3-5  presents national emissions of vinyl chloride.  Only non-SCCP
sources were reported in the available data.  Industrial processing accounts
for all emissions of vinyl  chloride.  The production of polyvinyl chloride
and vinyl chloride-ethylene dichloride account for approximately 99 percent
of all vinyl chloride emissions nationally.
3.5  TOTAL REDUCED SULFUR AND REDUCED SULFUR COMPOUNDS
     Available  data sources did not indicate total reduced sulfur and
reduced sulfur  compound emissions for stationary conventional combustion
sources.  Non-SCCP source category emissions were primarily from industrial
processes (see Table 3-6.).  Pollutants are ranked as follows according to
total emissions produced by these sources per year:
                                     41

-------
TABLE 3-4. 1974 NAT I ON AL ,£Mi SS&afSS&FS&Sftt- -ACID
, , --.-j^i -_"™ =*• r •fi^lWwBBIr.i'jjy ^~=sa-
SCCP Source Category
Electricity Generation
External Combustion
Coal
Oil
Internal Combustion
Oil
Turbines
Reciprocating Engines
Industrial Combustion
External Combustion
Coal
Oil
Internal Combustion
Oil
Turbines
Reciprocating Engines
Commercial /Institutional

External Combustion
Coal
Oil
Residential
Coal
Oil
Sulfuric Acid Mist (1000


144,213
49,885


190
56


22,675
33,559


169
70



2,358
43,536

2,449
39,908
TOTAL SCCP EMISSIONS 339,000
Non-SCCP Source Category
Sulfuric Acid
Production of Lead Acid
Batteries
Carbonizing Wool Fibers
Chlorosulfonic Acid
Salicylic Acid
Sal icyclates-Excluding
Aspirin
Brick and Tile Kilns &
Dryers
Chlorosulfonic Acid-
Inorganic Acids
Sul fated Ethoxylates-AEOS
MIST**.

kg/yr)

















c







Sulfuric Acid Mist (1000 kg/yr)
7,105.2

405.6
5.5
14.1
0.9

0.1

4,797.5

26.1
20.0
TOTAL NON-SCCP EMISSIONS 12,400.0














TOTAL SULFURIC ACID MIST EMISSIONS 351,000.0
Source:  Surprenant, et al, 1976(56.).
                              42

-------
   TABLE 3-5.  1974 NATIONAL EMISSIONS OF VINYL CHLORIDE
         Source Category
Vinyl Chloride (1000 kg/yr)
          SCCP Sources
        Non-SCCP Sources
Industrial Processes
  Polyvinyl Chloride
  Vinyl Chloride - Ethylene
    Di chloride
  Vinyl Chloride - Acetylene
  Caprolactam
  1,1,1 - Trichloroethane
  Polyvinylvinylidene Chloride
  Ethylene Dichloride -
    Oxyhydrochlorination

TOTAL VINYL CHLORIDE EMISSIONS
             NAa
          78,639.6

          10,357.0
             530.7
             155.1
             135.2
              61.9

               0.0

          89,900.0
aNA means no information available.
Data Source:  Eimutis, et al, 1978(66.).
                              43

-------
              TABLE  3-6.   1974 NATIONAL EMISSIONS OF TOTAL REDUCED SULFUR AND REDUCED SULFUR
                           COMPOUNDS  (1000 kg/yr)
Source Category
SCCP Sources
Non-SCCP Sources
Industrial Process
Carbon Black-Furnace
Natural Gas Processing
Petroleum Refining - Sulfur
Plant
Petroleum Refining - Vacuum
Distillation
Wood Processing - Neutral
Sulfite Semi chemical
Rayon - Semi synthetic
Viscose Rayon
Sodium Hydrosulfide - Sodium
Bisulfide or Sulfhydrate
Fish & Seafood Canning
Methyl Mercaptan
Wood Processing - Kraft or
Sulfate Process
Wood Processing - Neutral
Sulfite Semi chemical
Captafal
Falpet
Mixed Olefinic Product
Carbon Tetrachloride -
Chi ori nation of Propane
Carbon Tetrachloride -
Carbon Disulfide
Coffee Roasting
Phosphoric Acid - Thermal
Process
Captan
TOTAL EMISSIONS
Hydrogen
Sulfide
NAa


44,617.9
8,572.4

57,624.4

8,515.2

4,122.6

1,327.6

22.9
20.4
4.5

179,544.3




71.2






53.5

304,000.0
Dimethyl
Sulfide
NAa



























114.0



144.0
Dimethyl
Disulfide
NAa



























534.2



534.0
Carbon
Disulfide
NAa


44,617.9


8,550.7





1,217.0








0.7
0.7


589.7

531.6
36.0


4.5
55,500.0
Carbonyl
Sulfide
NAa


14,872.6


8,550.7

























23,400.0
Mercaptans
NAa

















74,131.0

1,470.1











75,600.0
aNA means no information available.

-------
                                 Pollutant
                            Hydrogen sulfide
                            Mercaptans
                            Carbon di sulfide
                            Carbonyl sulfide
                            Dimethyl di sulfide
                            Dimentyl sulfide

     Hydrogen sulfide emissions comprise over half of all total reduced
sulfur and reduced sulfur compound emissions from non-SCCP sources.   It
should be noted that, since available data sources did not provide emissions
information on methyl mercaptans separately, emissions of all mercaptans
are shown on the table.  Of the industrial processes, Carbon Black-Furnace,
Petroleum Refining-Sulfur Plant and Wood Processing - Kraft of Sulfate
Processes produce the largest quantity of these pollutants.
3.6  SUMMARY OF EMISSIONS
     Table 3-7 summarizes the total emissions for SCCP and non-SCCP  sources
for the twelve pollutants.  Of the trace elements, SCCP sources produce
nearly all of the beryllium and about 65 percent of the fluoride emissions
nationally.  Non-SCCP sources generate about 75 percent of the mercury
emissions.  Asbestos, vinyl chloride, and all total reduced sulfur and
reduced sulfur compounds are emitted exclusively by non-SCCP sources,
according to available data.  Sulfuric acid mist is produced primarily by
SCCP sources.
     Conclusions on this emissions inventory are based on information
found in available data sources.  All tables except that for sulfuric  acid
mist are based on data from Reference 66, Eimutis, et al, (1978).  Accord-
ing to one of the authors of the document, information presented in  this
source was based on 1974 NEDS data.  Some of these data were updated when
new information became available.   Other sources indicated that de minimi's
pollutant information had not been updated beyond 1974.  Also, this  docu-
ment is not all inclusive or exhaustive.  Data are more complete for some
pollutants than others.  If data were not included for certain source
categories, this may be due either to a lack of information on the source,
                                    45

-------
       TABLE 3-7.   COMPARISON OF SCCP VERSUS NON-SCCP POLLUTANT
                   EMISSIONS (1000 kg/yr)
        Pollutant
     Total
SCCP Emissions
       Total
Non-SCCP Emissions
  Mercury
  Beryllium
  Asbestos
  Fluorides
  Sulfuric Acid Mist
  Vinyl Chloride
Total Reduced Sulfur
  Hydrogen Sulfide
  Mercaptans
  Dimethyl Sulfide
  Dimethyl Disulfide
Reduced Sulfur Compounds
  Hydrogen Sulfide
  Carbon Disulfide
  Carbonyl Sulfide
     51.2
        266

     32,600
    339,000
          150
        0.3
          657
       17,300
       12,400
       89,900

      304,000
       75,600
          114
          534

      see above
        5,500
       23,400
                                   46

-------
or that a certain pollutant may not be emitted from this source.   Also,  in
rounding*certain values may be reduced to 0.0, but this 1s not necessarily
an indication that a pollutant is not being emitted from a source.
     Information on sulfuric acid emissions was derived from two  sources.
Non-SCCP data were obtained from Reference 66, Eimutis, et al, (1978).
Sulfuric acid emissions from SCCP sources were estimated by applying the
emission factors in Table 4-6 to a nationwide inventory of sulfur oxides
(reported as SOg) from Reference 56, Surprenant, et al, (1976).   This
document was based on a survey of data existing in literature  and informa-
tion supplied through contact with industry, government and academic
laboratories.
                                     47

-------
                           4.  EMISSION FACTORS

     This chapter presents pollutant emission factors for stationary con-
ventional combustion processes (SCCP).  The factors are summarized from
the CCEA information base and are primarily a result of extensive data
surveys being conducted under EPA's Emissions Assessment of Conventional
Combustion Systems (EACCS) program.  A discussion of the development of
these factors is presented in Section 5.  Section 6 contains a discussion
of the variability of actual emission factors and the expected uncertainty
in emission values calculated with the mean factors presented here.
4.1  TRACE ELEMENTS
     Tables 4-1 through 4-5 summarize trace element emission factors for
the predominant combustion source categories.  The trace elements subject
to the de minimi's guidelines are mercury, beryllium, and fluorides.
Because  the trace element emission factor data base was relatively undevel-
oped for industrial and commercial/institutional combustion processes,
emission factors for these combustion sources were based on similarities
to other combustion sources for which a more extensive data base was
developed.  Accordingly, Tables 4-1 to 4-3 present equivalent trace element
emission factors for utility and industrial boilers, with the values of the
factors  being based primarily on the more extensive emissions data base
available for utility boilers.  Values of emission factors for commercial/
institutional combustion sources (Table 4-5) are also based primarily on
the data base for utility boilers.  The rationale for the use of utility
boiler data for industrial and commercial/institutional emission factors is
discussed in Section 5.
     All emission factors are presented in terms of weight of the pollutant
per unit heat input of fuel.  In addition, most emission factors are pre-
sented in terms of the concentration of the pollutant in the fuel.  Thus,
source specific emission factors may be determined if fuel composition and
fuel  feed rate are known.  For the case of utility (or industrial) coal-fired
boilers, a parameterized factor (see Table 4-1) is available to characterize
source specific beryllium emission factors when values of influence para-
meters (i.e., enrichment ratio, particulate control efficiency) are known.

                                     48

-------
TABLE  4-1.   TRACE ELEMENT EMISSION  FACTORS  FOR  CONTROLLED  COAL-FIRED  UTILITY  AND  INDUSTRIAL  BOILERS
BITUMINOUS COAL

FURNACE TYPE
Pulverized Dry Bottom
Pulverized Dry Bottom
Pulverized Dry Bottom
Pulverized Wet Bottom
Pulverized Wet Bottom
Pulverized Wet Bottom
Cyclone Boiler
Cyclone Botler
Cyclone Boiler
Stoker
Stoker
Stoker
Stoker

CONTROL DEVICE
Electrostatic Preci pita tor
Mechanical Preci pita tor
Wet Scrubber
Electrostatic Preci pita tor
Mechanical Preci pi tator
Wet Scrubber
Electrostatic Preci pi tator
Mechanical Preclpltator
Wet Scrubber
Baghouse
Mechanical Preclpltator
Wet Scrubber
Electrostatic Preclpltator

Hg
39C
39C
7.8C
39C
39C
7.8C
39C
39C
7.8C
2.0
6.2
.
-
pg/J
Be
2.3C
7.8C
0.2C
1.9C
6.3C
0.2C
0.4C
1.3C
0.03C
0.06
5.5

-

F
40C
40C
8.0C
40C
40C
8.0C
40C
40C
8.0C
10
3540
—
-
                                                                                               LIGNITE COAL
                                                                                                   pg/J
                                                                                             Hg

                                                                                             64C
                                                                                             64C
                                                                                             13C

                                                                                             64C
                                                                                             64C
                                                                                             13C

                                                                                             64C
                                                                                             64C
                                                                                             13C
                                                                                             2.4

                                                                                             0.23
Be

0.7C
19C
0.3C
0.4C
18C
0.2C
5.9

0.11
50C
50C
IOC

50C
50C
IOC

50C
50C
IOC
423

638
       General Notes:                                                               c             3
           1.  For Be. the emission factor may be computed from the general equation E*rr -f  (I-E)ERXIO (see Section 5.1.1) Mhen
              source specific values  of the variables are known.
           2.  Most emission factors are shown In terms of C, the  trace element content 1n the coal.  C Is In units of ng/g,  or
              ppm.  Typical values of C for bituminous coal are 0.2, 0.9 and 100 for Ho, Be, and F,  respectively.  Typical
              values for lignite are 0.16, 0.8 and 37 for Hg, Be, and F, respectively.  The limited  data base for stoker units
              did not permit the expression of emission rates In  terms of C.
           3.  Blanks In the table Indicate that no emission  factor  Is reported In the existing data base.  The source configur-
              ations corresponding to these blanks are rarely encountered at industrial or utility boiler Installations.
           4.  Emission factors presented In this table are based  on  reference 1, (Sh1h,et al, October 1979) and reference 56
              (Surorenant, 1976).
           5.  Emissions for anthracite coal are not reported In the  existing data base.  However, the amount of anthracite coal
              used by combustion processes 1s very small (see Table  4-7) and expected to decrease to still lower levels of
              consumption  In the future.
           6.  To convert emission factor units to LB/1012BTU, multiply factors by 2.33.

-------
                      TABLE 4-2   TRACE ELEMENT  EMISSION   FACTORS FOR UNCONTROLLED COAL-FIRED
                                  UTILITY  AND INDUSTRIAL BOILERS
FURNACE
TYPE

Pulverized dry bottom
Pulverized wet bottom
Cyclone boiler
Stoker
BITUMINOUS COAL
pg/J
Hg
39 C
39 C
39 C
6.2
Be
26C
2 1C
4.4C
18
F
40C
40 C
40 C
3540
LIGNITE COAL
pg/o
Hg
64C
64C
64C
2.4
Be
81C
--
67C
24
F
50C
50 C
50 C ,
423
in
o
         General  Notes:
                                                                               \
           1.   Emission   factors  presented  in  this  table are based on Reference 1 (Shih, et al 1979).

           2.   Most  emission   factors  are shown  in  terms of C, the trace element content (in yg/g or ppm) in
               the coal.   The  limited  data  base  for stoker units did not permit the expression of emission
               rates  in  terms  of  C.

           3.   Blanks indicate that  no emission  factor  is reported in the existing data base.

           4.   To convert emission  factor units  to  LB/10^BTU, multiply factors by 2.33.

-------
                 TABLE 4-3   TRACE ELEMENT EMISSION FACTORS FOR OIL-FIRED
                             AND GAS-FIRED UTILITY AND INDUSTRIAL BOILERS
FURNACE
TYPE
UNCONTROLLED0
Tangential firing
Wall firing
RESIDUAL OIL3
P9/J
Hg Be F

23C 24C 23C
23C 24C 23C
NATURAL GASb
pg/J
Hg Be

4.9 Nil
4.9 Nil

F

Nil
Nil
(a)  Emission  factors for residual oil are calculated based on characterization  of eleven  residual  oil
     samples and the assumption that all trace elements in the oil  feed  are emitted through the  stack
     (Shin, et al, October 1979).  C indicates the concentration of trace  element in residual  oil,  in  ppm.

(b)  Based on stack test measurements for gas-fired utility boilers (i.).

(c)  When boilers are equipped with wet scrubbers (used for flue gas desulfurization),  the  emission  factor
     for Be may be assumed to be 0.01 times the uncontrolled factor given  above,  and emissions of Hg and
     F are .2 times the values given above (1.).

NOTE:  To convert emission factor units to LB/1012BTU, multiply factors  by 2.33.

-------
                      TABLE  4-4.   TRACE  ELEMENT  EMISSION  FACTORS FOR INTERNAL COMBUSTION SOURCES

SOURCE
TYPE


Gas turbine
Reciprocating engine
DISTILLATE
OIL

pg/J
Hg Be F Hg
.39 .14 -- 4.9
.13 .03 -- 4.9
NATURAL
GAS

pg/J
Be
Nil
Nil




F
Nil
Nil
en
ro
      General  Notes:
           1.   Emission   factors  are  based  on  characterization  of  fuel  samples as  described  in  Reference  57
               (Shin  et  al,February 1979) with the  exception  of emissions  for Hg from natural gas-firing  which
               are  based on  stack test  measurements for  gas-fired  utility  boilers  as reported in  Reference  1
               (Shih,  et al,  October  1979).
           2.   Blanks  in the table indicate that  no emission  are reported  in the existing data  base.
           3.   To convert emission factor units to  LB/1012BTU,  multiply factors by 2.33.

-------
TABLE 4-5.  TRACE ELEMENT EMISSION FACTORS FOR UNCONTROLLED COMMERCIAL/
                        INSTITUTIONAL EXTERNAL COMBUSTION
TYPE OF FURNACE                EMISSION FACTOR , pg/J

                               Hg                Be
Bituminous Coal:
Pulverized Dry Bottom
Pulverized Wet Bottom
Stoker
Residual Oil
Tangential or Wall firing
Natural Gas
Tangential or Wall firing

39C
39C
6.2

23C

4.9

26C
21C
0.6Cb

24C

Nil

40C
40C
3540

23C

Nil
(a)  Unless otherwise noted, emission factors above are based on reference
     1 (Shih, et al, October, 1979).

(b)  The emission rate of Be from Stokers was determined by adjusting the
     emissions factor for utility stokers.  The adjustment was made by
     comparing the coal ash/fly ash ratio for utility boilers versus the
     coal ash/fly ash ratio for commercial/institutional boilers.
     (See discussion of Section 5.1.4.)

(c)  The term C in the emissions factor indicates the concentration of
     trace element in the fuel, in ppm.

NOTE:  To convert emission factor units to LB/1012BTU, multiply factor
       by 2.33.
                                    53

-------
     Tables 4-1 through  4-5 present emission factors  for the  trace elements
mercury, beryllium, and  fluorides.   Depending on  the  type of  emission con-
trol, fuel, and fuel  composition, it is  possible  that emissions  from some
new utility or industrial  boilers would  exceed the proposed de mini mis
emission rates for these pollutants.  For example, a  500 MW pulverized dry
bottom boiler (operating at 60 percent capacity and 40 percent overall
efficiency) burning typical bituminous coal  and controlled to meet the New
Source Performance Standards (NSPS) for  criteria  pollutants would be
expected to emit about 0.004 metric tons per year of  beryllium,  0.04 metric
tons per year of mercury and 10 metric tons  per year  of fluorides.  These
emission levels are nearly equivalent to the proposed de minimi's levels of
0.004 and 0.2 metric tons  per year for beryllium  and  mercury, and greater
than the proposed level  of 0.02 metric tons  per year  for fluorides.  When
coal of high trace element composition is used, the de minimis levels may
also be exceeded for mercury and beryllium.   However, for NSPS controlled
coal-fired boilers of average size (100  to 500 MW), the trace element
de minimis levels would  normally be exceeded only for fluorides.  These
calculated emission values are subject to some uncertainty because of
variabilities in the parameters used for the calculation, especially for
beryllium emissions from coal combustion. These  uncertainties are dis-
cussed in Section 6.
     Emissions from large oil fired boilers  burning low sulfur fuel and
not equipped with flue gas desulfurization (FGD)  units would  be  expected
to exceed the de minimis levels for beryllium and fluorides.   For example,
a 500 MW oil fired boiler (operating at  60 percent capacity and  40 percent
overall efficiency) would emit 0.05 metric tons per year of beryllium
and 0.06 metric tons per year of fluorides (assuming  a typical fuel com-
position of 0.08 and 0.12 ppm for Be and F,  respectively).  These emission
levels exceed the de minimis levels of 0.004 and  0.02 metric  tons per year
for beryllium and fluorides.  Respectively, however,  when the same boiler
is equipped with an FGD unit to achieve  the NSPS, the expected emission
levels would be 0.005 and 0.013 metric tons per year for beryllium and
fluorides, respectively.
                                    54

-------
     It should be noted that the relatively high stacks (e.g., 100 to 200 M)
associated with large boilers would probably preclude the possibility that
emissions from these sources would result in levels exceeding the de minimi's
ambient air guidelines, despite the expectancy that the de minimis emission
levels may be exceeded in some cases.
4.2  SULFURIC ACID MIST
     Table 4-6 summarizes sulfuric acid emission factors for various un-
controlled combustion sources.  Because the data base was limited, emission
factors were combined into the overall source categories shown.   While in-
sufficient data exist to quantify the influence parameters affecting H2S04
emissions, it should be.noted that the values in Table 4-6 may change
significantly depending on oxygen levels in the flue gases, power level  of
the process, and the concentration of trace elements vanadium, magnesium,
and sodium in the fuel.
     Sulfuric acid emission levels from large coal and oil fired external
combustion sources would be expected to exceed the de minimi's level of one
metric ton per year.  When a wet scrubber is used to meet the NSPS, the
expected emissions of sulfuric acid mist from a 500 MW boiler (operating
at 60 percent capacity and 40 percent overall efficiency) burning  bitu-
minous coal of two percent sulfur would be 210 metric tons per year.  The
expected emissions of sulfuric acid mist from a 500 MW boiler controlled
by wet scrubbing and burning two percent oil would be 420 metric tons per
year.
     Emissions of sulfuric acid mist from internal combustion units are not
likely to exceed the de minimis levels.  The average size of these sources
1s about 2 MW, and sulfuric acid emissions are not expected to be greater
than about one metric ton/year per unit (reciprocating engine or gas
turbine).
                                    55

-------
                           TABLE 4-6.  EMISSION FACTORS FOR SULFURIC ACID MIST FROM COMBUSTION SOURCES
SOURCE
Percent of
fuel Sulfur
in H2S04
Emission
Factor^
ng/J
Information
Sources
(Reference no.)
en
UNCONTROLLED D
  EXTERNAL COMBUSTION
  Bituminous coal- fired utility boilers
  Oil-fired utility boilers
                                                                     .74
                                                                     2.4
 8.8S
16.9S
58,22,2,14,56
59,58,56
                        INTERNAL COMBUSTION
                        Distillate oil-fueled gas turbine            3.8
                        Distillate oil-fueled reciprocating engine   1.4
                        Gas-fueled internal combustion               Nil
                                                              1.5
                                                              8.9S
                                                              Nil
                 60,61
                 62,57
                 57
                      (a)   Some  emission  factors  are  presented  in  terms of S, the percent sulfur in the fuel.
                           The limited  data  base  for  distillate oil-fueled gas turbines did not permit the
                           expression of  emission rates in terms of fuel sulfur concentration.
                      (b)   For controlled emission  rates, multiply uncontrolled levels above by 0.50 when flue gas
                           desulfurization units  are  used, 1.0  when cold side ESPs or mechanical precipitators are
                           used,  and 2.4  when  hot side  ESPs are used  (63, 64, 65, 67, 68),
                      NOTE:  To  convert emission  factor units to LB/1012BTU, multiply factor by 2.33.

-------
4.3  ASBESTOS AND VINYL CHLORIDE
     An information search revealed no available emission data for asbestos
or vinyl chloride from stationary combustion sources.  Potential emission
sources of asbestos from combustion systems were identified as internal
insulation materials, coal, and limestone used in flue gas desulfurization
units.  Emissions of asbestos from any of these sources is expected to be
negligible.  More data are needed to accurately quantify the significance
of the potential sources.  Potential emissions of vinyl chloride are not
expected to exceed the de minimis emission levels.  Conditions in the com-
bustion environment are extremely unfavorable for the information of vinyl
chloride, and existing emission data for hydrocarbon emissions indicate
low emissions levels for hydrocarbon groups containing vinyl chloride.
Specific emission data for vinyl chloride are needed to accurately quantify
an emission factor for this compound.
                                    57

-------
                    5.   DEVELOPMENT OF EMISSION FACTORS

     The estimation of environmental loadings arising from combustion pro-
cesses depends on characterization of the emission rates peculiar to the
various combustion sources.   The characterization of emissions of noncriteria
pollutants such as those considered for de minimi's cutoff levels is a
special problem because the  data base is often inadequate.  This chapter
discusses the manner in which the available data base has been used to
develop the pollutant emission factors presented in Section 4. for station-
ary conventional combustion  sources.
5.1  TRACE ELEMENT EMISSIONS
     Trace elements which are considered for de minimi's cutoffs are mer-
cury, beryllium, and fluorides.   Mercury and fluorides are discharged
to the atmosphere primarily  in the gas phase, and it is plausible to assume
that all quantities present  in the coal feed are emitted to the stack.
The emission rate of beryllium,  on the other hand, depends on the parti-
tioning of the element between particles in the flyash and bottom ash
fraction, and between flyash particles in the control device collector
and the control device exhaust.
5.1.1  External Combustion - Utility Boilers
     Trace element emission  rates depend greatly on the type of fuel.
Three principal fuels are used:   coal, residual oil, and natural gas.
Coal Combustion
     The existing data base  for trace element emissions from coal fired
utility boilers is discussed extensively in Volume III of the Emissions
Assessment of Conventional Combustion Sources (1.).   The data base was
developed from a large number of reference sources, as listed at the con-
clusion of this report.  The major drawbacks in the data base concern the
limited information with respect to trace element emissions from lignite
combustion and the absence of data for trace element emissions from stoker
units.  Also, the data base  contained limited information for the charac-
terization of trace element  emissions from sources controlled by mechanical
precipitators and wet scrubbers.
                                   58

-------
     Because trace element emissions are dependent on a number of factors,
including trace element content of coal, boiler firing configuration,
boiler size, and particulate control device efficiency, it is practical  to
develop trace emission factors in a parameterized format to account for  the
effect of the more important variables.   In the EACCS program (l.),the equa-
tion used to calculate trace element emission factors is:

                       EF • -jj- . F (I-E) ER X 103

     where EF = emission factor for a specific trace element, ng/J
            C = concentration of element in coal, vg/g
            H = higher heating value of coal, kJ/kg
            F = fraction of coal ash as  fly ash
            E = fractional particulate collection efficiency of control
                device.
           ER = enrichment factor for the trace element (ratio of concen-
                tration of element in emitted flyash to concentration of
                element in coal ash)

     The use of enrichment factors enables direct comparison and compilation
of trace element emission data on a normalized basis.  This normalization
scheme is appropriate because the enrichment behavior of trace elements  is
generally consistent, despite differences in furnace or coal types, and
sampling or analysis procedures (1. through 13.).
     Unique emission rates are associated with different sets of fuel type,
boiler type and control device type.  Table 4-1 in Section 4. summarizes
the emission factors for these sets, as  computed in the EACCS program using
the available data base and the equation above.
              TABLE 5-1.   EFFICIENCIES OF CONTROL SYSTEMS

Electrostatic predpltator
Mechanical predpltator
Wet Scrubber
Bituminous Coal
All Boilers
.98
.70
.99 ;
Lignite Coal
Pul. Dry Bottom cyclone
.99 .99
.76 .73
.99 .99
Note:  Based on data base comprised of References 3., 4., 14.through 22.
                                   59

-------
        TABLE 5-2.   FRACTION  OF  COAL  ASH  AS  FLY  ASH  IN COAL  FIRING

Pulverized dry bottom
Pulverized wet bottom
Cyclone
Stoker
Bituminous Coal
.80
.65
.135
.60
Lignite Coal
.35
.30
 Note:   Based  on  evaluations conducted  in the EACCS  program  (!.)>  using  data
        base comprised of  References  3., 4., 14.through 22.

      Enrichment  factors used  to  calculate  trace  element  emission factors  were
 determined in the  EACCS program  by averaging values  reported  by the  various
 reference  sources  of the  existing data base.  Since  enrichment  factors  depend
 on  the  efficiency  of the  emission control  device, separate  factors were de-
 termined for  three types  of control  devices; electrostatic  precipitators,
 mechanical  precipitators, and wet scrubbers.
     Based on evaluations conducted  in the EACCS program (1.),  the fraction-
 al  collection efficiencies for coal-fired boilers are shown in  Table 5-1.
 These efficiencies  represent  the average control observed for installations
 associated with  the trace element emissions data base.  The control  levels
 for electrostatic  precipitators and wet scrubbers are sufficient to attain
 compliance with  the New Source Performance Standards for boilers.
     The average fraction of  coal ash produced as fly ash varies with coal
 type and boiler  type as shown in Table 5-2.
     Concentrations of trace  elements for bituminous coal and lignite were
 tabulated from published  U.S.  Geological  Survey Data (24.) and the  computer-
 ized National Coal  Resources  Data System (23.), and supplemented by  other
 reference sources  (25. through 54.).  The average values for trace element
 concentrations were determined by weighting the area specific concentra-
 tions with annual production  by county (55.).
     The calculation of emission factors  for mercury and fluorides does not
 require the calculation of enrichment factors,  since these elements are
discharged from coal combustion primarily in the gas phase.   If mechanical
or electrostatic precipitators are used to control  emissions, it is assumed
that all amounts of these  elements contained in the coal  are emitted
through the stack.   When wet scrubbers are used, the data base  indicates  an
average removal efficiency of eightly percent  for mercury and fluorides (1.).

                                   60

-------
     The data base compiled In the EACCS program contained no information
for trace element emissions from stoker units.  Consequently, a test pro-
gram was conducted as a part of the EACCS program to obtain the necessary.
data.  Because the data resulting from these tests are limited, and because
trace element analyses were performed using semi quantitative analysis tech-
niques, enrichment factors were not calculated from the data, and it is not
possible to normalize the test results with respect to trace element
composition in the fuel.  Hence, for the limited stoker units tested, the
differences in trace element contents of the various fuels and control
devices result in substantial variation in the test results and the cal-
culated emission factors.
     Trace element emission factors for uncontrolled utility boilers were
estimated by factoring out the effects of control  devices from the exten-
sive data base compiled for controlled boilers.  Control  devices affect
both the enrichment factors and overall particulate collection rates.
Enrichment factors for uncontrolled boiler emissions were assumed to be
equivalent to those observed for boilers equipped with the low-efficiency
mechanical precipitators.  The effect of the mechanical precipitator on
collection of particulate matter (including trace elements) was factored
out of the controlled emissions data base by applying the average collec-
tion efficiencies presented previously in this section to the emission
factors of Table 4-1.  The results are shown in Table 4-2.  (See Section
4.1.)
Gas and Oil-Fired Boilers
     The data base compiled in the CCEA program includes analysis results
of residual  oil  samples from eleven separate oil-fired boiler sites. These
trace element concentrations were used to calculate mean emission factors,
assuming that all trace elements present in the oil feed are emitted through
the stack (1.).   The emission factors are expressed 1n terms of the trace
element concentration in the residual oil (Table 4-3).  (See Section 4.1.)
     The data base for trace element emissions from gas-fired utility
boilers is extremely limited.  Measurements of trace element emissions from
seven separate gas-fired boilers were conducted as part of the EACCS pro-
gram to supplement the existing data base.  However, measurements were
                                    61

-------
conducted for a limited number of trace elements, and concentrations  for
only one of the pollutants of concern in this study, mercury, were deter-
mined.
5.1.2  External Combustion - Industrial Boilers
     Emissions from industrial boilers are governed by the same principles
that apply to utility boilers.  However, differences in combustion equip-
ment design and operating practices may result in differences in emission
factors.  Generally industrial combustion equipment is smaller and less
efficiently operated than electric utility equipment, resulting in greater
emission rates from industrial boilers.
     GCA is currently evaluating emission rates from industrial boilers
under the ongoing EACCS program.  The evaluation includes  a comprehensive
survey of the existing data base for trace element emissions, and the cal-
culation of trace element emission factors for various sets of boiler
design, fuel type, and control device.  However, the results of this  effort
will not be available until mid-1980.  In the interim, the most comprehen-
sive synthesis of trace element emissions data and computation of trace
element emissions factors for industrial boilers is found  in GCA's
Preliminary Emissions Assessment of Conventional Stationary Combustion
Systems (56.).
     GCA estimates trace element emissions from coal-fired industrial boil-
ers based on fuel composition and distribution of fly ash  to bottom ash for
the various external combustion categories.   Because the data base was too
limited to permit characterization of trace element enrichment behavior in
the fly ash, it was assumed in this reference that trace element concentra-
tion was equally partitioned (no enrichment) between the fly ash and
bottom ash.  GCA then applied the fraction of coal emitted as fly ash to
the trace element composition to calculate uncontrolled emission factors.
Controlled emission factors were determined by adjusting the uncontrolled
factors using typical particulate control efficiencies and assuming that
trace elements are partitioned equally (per unit mass) between the collected
matter and the matter escaping through the stack.  However, since the
existing data base is inadequate to characterize differences in fuel  com-
position and fly ash/bottom ash ratios between the Industrial and Utility

                                    62

-------
sectors, it 1s also not possible to establish separate uncontrolled emission
factors for these two sectors.  Similarly, since emission control capability
is equivalent for both utility and industrial boilers, the controlled emis-
sion factors are the same for each of these two combustion sectors.
     Since there are insufficient data (based on available data base
surveys) to permit discrimination between trace element emissions from
utility boilers and industrial boilers, emission factors were assigned to
industrial boilers based on the recent investigation of utility boiler
emissions conducted under the EACCS program (1.).  This work assembled an
extensive data base which permitted characterization of trace element en-
richment factors, fly ash/bottom ash ratios, fuel composition, and control
device efficiencies. (See Section 1.1.1.)  Table 4-1 summarizes trace
element emission factors for coal-fired industrial boilers.  (See Section
4.1.)
     The available data base for trace element emissions from oil-fired and
gas-fired industrial boilers is also insufficient to permit a quantifying
distinction between the utility and industrial combustion sector.  There-
fore, trace element emission factors for industrial boilers were assigned
values equivalent to those compiled for utility boilers in the EACCS pro-
gram (1.).  Table 4-3 summarizes trace element emission factors for oil and
gas fired  industrial  boilers.
5.1.3  Internal Combustion - Industrial or Electricity Generation
     The data base for trace element emissions from internal combustion
sources is discussed extensively 1n Volume II of the Emissions Assessment
of Conventional Stationary Combustion Systems (57.).   The data base was
developed from various references and supplemented by additional test data
acquired 1n the EACCS program.
     Measurements of trace elements emissions in the stack gases from a gas
fueled turbine revealed the presence of negligible or nondiscernlble amounts
for most of the trace elements.  However, emission of mercury vapors during
gas firing were of the same magnitude as those resulting during oil-firing
and are consistent with the levels observed in tests of utility boilers
(as discussed earlier in Section 5.1.1).  Table 4-4 shows trace element
emission factors for gas-fired turbines.

                                    63

-------
     Table 4-4 also presents trace element emissions data for distillate
oil-fueled gas turbines and distillate oil (diesel fuel) engines.  The
emissions data were based on the trace element content of the fuel used at
various test facilities, and represent maximum potential emission rates.
The emission factors for the turbine and engine are of the same order of
magnitude, and are the result of the similarity between the trace element
content of turbine and engine fuels.
5.1.4  External Combustion - Commercial/Institutional
     GCA is currently evaluating emissions from commercial/institutional
combustion systems under the ongoing EACCS program.  The evaluation will
include a comprehensive survey of the existing data base for trace element
emission, and the determination of trace element emission factors for
various sets of boiler design and fuel type.   Until the results of this
effort are available, the most comprehensive  synthesis of trace element
emissions data for commercial/institutional  combustion systems is found
in GCA's Preliminary Emissions Assessment of  Conventional Stationary Com-
bustion Systems (56.).   In this document, GCA estimates trace element
emissions factors from commercial/institutional combustion systems for
coal-fired boilers based on fuel composition  ratio of fly ash to bottom ash
for the various combustion categories.  Trace element concentration is
assumed to be equally partitioned between bottom ash and fly ash.  The fly
ash/bottom ash ratio is assumed to be the same as that for industrial
boilers, with the exception of stoker units.   For stoker units, the fly
ash/bottom ash ratio is assumed to be 5/95 as compared to 35/65 for indus-
trial stokers.  Hence, emission factors for trace elements from commercial/
institutional stoker units are seven times less than from industrial stoker
units.   This relative difference was applied  to stoker emission factors for
the industrial sector to calculate emission factors for commercial/insti-
tutional stoker units.  The emission rate for other combustor types is
assumed to be the same as that for industrial boilers.  The emission factors
are shown in Table 4-5.  (See Section 4.1.)
     The available data base for trace element emissions from oil-fired and
gas-fired commercial/institutional boilers is insufficient to permit a
quantifying distinction between the various  boiler sectors.  Therefore,
                                    64

-------
trace element emission factors for commercial/institutional boilers were
assigned values equivalent to those compiled for utility boilers in the
EACCS program (1.).   Table 4-5 summarizes trace element emission factors '
for oil and gas fired commercial/institutional boilers.
5.2  ASBESTOS EMISSIONS
     Asbestos is the generic term for any of six naturally occurring
crystalline mineral hydrated silicates.  Asbestos occurs in a fibrous state,
and is formed by the metamorphosis of serpentine and amphibole minerals.
     Asbestos emissions result from the mining of asbestos ores, the mil-
ling of asbestos ores for production of five fibrous asbestos materials,
and the manufacture and end use of various asbestos-containing materials.
Based on existing emission inventories, it is estimated that 90 percent of
asbestos emissions arise during mining, manufacturing or production of
asbestos, while it is estimated that five percent of the total asbestos
emissions result from end-uses of asbestos-containing products (69.).
     No accurate asbestos emission factors are reported in the existing data
base.  Existing emission inventories developed for asbestos are based on
engineering judgments and very limited data.  The CCEA information base was
searched for data on asbestos emissions from stationary combustion systems,
fuel and fly ash composition studies were evaluated, emission inventories
for noncriteria pollutants were examined, and various cognizant individuals
of pertinent agencies were consulted.
     One possible source of emissions resulting from end-use of asbestos in
combustion systems is internal insulation in boiler breechings and ducts.
The rate of erosion of internal asbestos insulation is unknown, and the
integrity of the eroded fibers as an asbestos form is not known.  However,
it is not expected that the quantity of emitted insulation materials would
approach the de minimis emission levels.  For example, 1f asbestos emissions
resulted only from insulation loss, a stack emission rate of one ton per
year of asbestos (the de minimls level) would be equivalent to the loss of
approximately 90 tons per year of asbestos insulation from the boiler
equipment, assuming the stack emissions are controlled for particulate
matter.  As  this  depletion  rate  is  several  orders  of magnitude  greater
than  the amount of internal  insulation  used in  a  large  boiler installation,
it  is  apparent  that emissions  of eroded insulation are  actually negligible.
                                     65

-------
Moreover, the use of asbestos insulation is no longer commonplace, as other
insulating materials with greater resistance to high temperatures are
presently being used instead.  Use of these substitute insulation materials
also avoids the hazards previously experienced from exposure to asbestos
emissions during application of the insulator to the boiler equipment.

     Other potential sources of asbestos emissions  are flue gas desulfur-
ization (FGD) units which use limestone as the scrubbing medium.  In some
deposits, limestone is known to contain the asbestos fibers tremolite and
actinolite (72.).   As combustion flue gases are treated in a limestone FGD
unit, trace amounts of asbestos may be generated and emitted out the stack.
No information is available from the existing data  base to characterize the
chemistry associated with asbestos emissions from limestone scrubbers or
the quantities of asbestos which may arise.
     Still another potential asbestos emission source in combustion systems
is coal itself.  However, only trace amounts of minerals are usually found
in coal deposits and it is not expected that detectable amounts of asbestos
occur in coal (71.).  Moreover, it is expected that the normal  temperatures
produced in the combustion zone are sufficient to disintegrate  any asbestos
fibers present (70,).
     In the development of the present national emission standards for
asbestos, various mining, processing, manufacturing and end-use sources of
asbestos emissions were considered.  However, stationary combustion systems
were not addressed as a source of concern.  Preliminary investigations
should be conducted to assess the significance of asbestos emissions aris-
ing from potential sources in combustion systems.
5.3  SULFURIC ACID MIST EMISSIONS
     Sulfuric acid ^$04) is a product found in the flue gases of combus-
tion systems.  It is formed when S02 in the combustion gases in oxidized
to $03, followed by the combination of SOs with water vapor in  the stack
gas.  Sufficient water vapor exists in the stack to convert essentially all
SOa to H2$04 before it is finally emitted out the stack.  As the H2S04 is
emitted and is cooled to temperatures below the acid dew point, it is
transformed to a liquid aerosol known as "sulfuric  acid mist".
                                    66

-------
     Sulfuric acid may be adsorbed on solid particulate matter in the stack
or condensed on boiler surfaces.  This results in the formation of metal
surfates (MS04) and corrosion products.  The sulfates which are formed, the
$03, and the ^804 vapor and liquid aerosol, are all referred to as primary
sulfates.  (Secondary sulfates are sulfur oxidation products formed in the
atmosphere.)
     Because current analytical methods and reporting procedures for primary
sulfates vary, the resulting emissions data may be misleading.  Generally,
the analytical approaches used allow a separate determination of particulate
and gaseous forms of the primary sulfates (.64.).   The gaseous sulfates,
consisting of HgS04 and SOg, are collected by filter for analysis by wet
chemical techniques.  Depending on the temperature of the filter and the
sampled stack gases, some fraction of the h^SCty present in the sample
stream will be collected by the filter as aerosol particulate matter.  The
aerosol H2S04 on the filter is indistinguishable from the particulate
sulfates during analysis, and is included as total particulate sulfate.
In sampling systems using high temperature probes and filters, the portion
of H2S04 collected by the particulate filter is minor, while systems which
sample isokinetically from the stack may contain significant portions of
aerosol H2S04 which is collected on the filter (78.).   Thus, emissions data
surveys for average emission levels tend to understate the actual level of
H2S04 to some degree, depending on the type of sampling procedures asso-
ciated with the data base.  However, this understatement is mitigated to
some degree, considering that some H2S04 is adsorbed on particulate matter
between the stack sample point (typically near the base of stack) and the
stack exit.
     Emissions of 863 and H2S04 depend on numerous operating parameters.
The parameter causing the most pronounced effect on $03/^504 emissions is
the amount of excess oxygen supplied to the burners.  Low excess air opera-
tion is most practical in oil-fired systems, whereas the technology for
burning pulverized coal at low oxygen levels is not available.  Excess air
must be less than two percent to decrease SOs formation by one half from
normal operation at twelve to 20 percent excess air.  $03 concentration can
be reduced to essentially zero at 0.1 percent oxygen in the flue gas (63.).
                                    67

-------
     Sulfuric acid concentration in flue gas is also related to the boiler
load factor (i.e., the operating power level compared to the design full
power level), the sulfur content of the fuel, and the concentrations of
vanadium, magnesium, and sodium in the fuel.  The latter trace elements
introduce a catalytic effect on the reaction of S02 to $03.   Recently.
studies have been conducted to quantify the relationship of  the various
influence factors affecting sulfuric acid and sulfate emissions (67.).
Such models are in formative stages of development, and may  be useful  when
plant specific data are available to characterize the influence variables
and calibrate the model.
     Emissions data for f^SC^ (including SOs reported as  h^SC^)  are pre-
sented in Table 4-6.   Because the data were very limited  for some boiler
firing types, data were combined into the general  source  categories shown.
However, the variability of the combined emissions data base is  less than
0.7, and may, under the criteria established in  the EACCS program (!.)»  be
considered an adequate portrayal of S03/H2S04 emissions from utility
boilers.  No data for lignite-fired utility boilers were  found.
     In the absence of emissions data for industrial  boilers, the emission
rate of S03/H2S04 from industrial boilers was assumed to  be  equivalent to
that of utility boilers.
     The most extensive survey of the SC^/h^SCh  emissions  data base for
internal combustion sources was developed in the EACCS  program (57.).   The
SOo/^SO^ emission data base was found to be adequate for  oil  fueled gas
turbines; however, limited data were available to characterize S03/H2S04
emissions from reciprocating engines.   Table 4-6 summarizes  the emission
factors and information sources for internal combustion sources.
     Conventional  control  equipment which is used to reduce  emissions of
parti cul ate matter and S02 from flue gases may also affect emissions of
sulfuric acid.   Of the controls used, flue gas desulfurization systems
exert the greatest impact  on H2S04 emissions.   Evaluation  of data for lime
and limestone scrubbers at various coal-fired sources (63.)  has shown that
desulfurization systems operating at 80 to 90 percent S02  removal also
removal about 50 percent of the SO- and HUSO^ in the flue  gas.   Evaluation
of test data for emissions from conventional electrostatic precipitator
(ESP) installations at coal and oil-fired sites  has shown  that an ESP has
                                   68

-------
no effect on the concentration fo S03/H2$04 in the flue gases (64.).   How-
ever, emissions of S03/H2S04 may increase appreciably when an ESP is
installed upstream of heat recovery equipment ("hot side" configuration).,
Electrical arcing across the ESP electrodes converts S02 to $03 rapidly
at the higher temperatures in the hot side ESP (65.).   In limited tests
conducted at a coal-fired industrial boiler equipped with a hot side ESP,
flue gas concentrations of S03/H2S04 increased by 242 percent through the
ESP (65.).
5.4  VINYL CHLORIDE EMISSIONS
     No emissions data for vinyl chloride were reported in the CCEA data
base.  Some specific organic compounds have been identified in flue gases
of combustion systems, but quantitative data on the emissions of these
compounds is extremely limited.  Generally, conditions of high temperature,
mixing, ample residence time and excess oxygen in the combustion environ-
ment have been considered unfavorable for formation of organic compounds
in quantities which could cause significant environmental concern.  In
fact, a common method used to control emissions of chlorinated hydrocarbons
(i.e., vinyl chloride) from manufacturing facilities involves incineration
in steam boilers (220).  This control technique has been used in existing
boilers without affecting normal operations or boiler efficiency.
     Although the amount of vinyl chloride emission in flue gases  cannot be
determined specifically, the quantitative emissions data base does demon-
strate that emission levels of vinyl chloride from combustion systems will
not exceed the de minimis levels.  Table 5-3 shows emissions factors for
63 alkanes measured in stack gases for various utility boilers and fuel
types in the EACCS program (1.).   The data were obtained by chromatograph
using a normal boiling point retention time calibration, according to EPA's
Level 1 Method.  As the boiling point of vinyl chloride is -13.9 C, the
chromatograph will report this compound in the range of €3 alkanes in terms
of propane (74.).   Thus, assuming that as much as ten percent of organics
reported as 63 alkanes are vinyl chloride (a conservative assumption, con-
sidering the stability and formation potential of vinyl chloride relative
to other more common alkanes), and that the greatest expected emission rate
would be 410 pg/J (see Table 5-3), the total emissions of vinyl chloride
                                    69

-------
 Table  5-3.   EMISSIONS OF C3 HYDROCARBONS  FROM UTILITY BOILERS
                                          Maximum Emission  Rate  Reported
 Combustion  Source                                       P9/J
 Bituminous  Coal-fired  Utility Boilers
      pulverized  dry  bottom                              320
      pulverized  wet  bottom                              160
      cyclone                                            280
      stoker                                            320

 Lignite-fired  Utility  Boilers
      pulverized  dry  bottom                              410
      cyclone                                            260
      stoker                                            370

 Oil-fired  Utility Boilers
      tangential  firing                                 320
      wall-firing                                       340

 Gas-fired  Utility Boilers
      tangential-firing                                 200
      wall-firing                                       250
 Source:   Shih,  C.,  et  al,  1979(1.)
from a 500 MW lignite fired boiler would be 0.7 tons per year.   This is

less than the de minimis level  of 1 ton per year.

5.5  TOTAL REDUCED SULFUR AND REDUCED SULFUR COMPOUND EMISSIONS

     Theoretically, under normal combustion process  conditions  all  of the

sulfur, in any type of fuel, would be converted to sulfur oxides, most of

which is sulfur dioxide.  Sulfur trioxide and primary sulfates  are also

formed in the oxidative process.  It has been observed (80.),  however, that

less than the expected amount of sulfur is completely oxidized.  The actual

amount is usually from 79 to 99 percent.  The remaining sulfur may be found
                                    70

-------
as sulfur compounds retained in coal  and oil  bottom ash or slag in the form
of metal sulfides.  If reduced sulfur compounds exist in a combustion
(oxidation) process as a part of the  flue gas, it would have to be under
reducing combustor conditions.   Combustion thermodynamics, which would
govern the formation of any sulfides, are a function of the fell owing
parameters:
     •  Fuel type: percent sulfur, percent ash and concentration of metals
     •  Temperature and air/fuel ratio (stoichiometry)
     •  Mode of combustion: type of firing, time in combustor, etc.
     •  Kinetic limitations of the sulfur reactions

     The CCEA information base was searched for data on emissions, analy-
tical methods of determination, fuel  combustion and studies, and any mass
balance approaches to reduced sulfur evaluation.  National emission inven-
tories for noncriteria pollutants were examined for historical  reduced
sulfur emissions, and persons knowledgeable in the field were contacted.
     Very little pertinent information is available.  One report (80.)
contains information on hydrogen sulfide, carbonyl sulfide, and carbon
disulfide.  This information was limited to a mole fraction computer study
of sulfur distribution in four types  of coal.  The other (83.)  included
total sulfide and total reduced sulfur species as a percent of oil  and coal
fired fly ash composition.  In either case the recorded levels  are always
less than 0.01 percent of the sulfur in fuel.  The report states that
"although the method of determination of sulfate might measure other sulfur
species, determinations have shown the presence of other sulfur forms to
be negligible".  While examination of the literature reveals that many of
these sulfur compounds have been observed at coal gasification and oil
refinery sources (81.,82.),  no other combustion emissions data nor any
other analytical procedures are mentioned for the measurement of total
reduced and reduced sulfur pollutants from conventional combustion sources.
     Furthermore, all persons contacted (see Appendix A) have no knowledge
of any reports or ongoing projects that measure the sulfur compounds at
conventional combustion sites.  Most of them informally agreed to the
assumption, a priori, that one would not expect appreciable amounts of
these pollutants in an oxidative process.

                                    71

-------
      6.  SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS  PROCEDURES  USED TO OBTAIN  EMISSIONS  DATA

     This section presents a discussion of  the following major areas related
to emission measurement for the  pollutants  subject to the  de minimis guide-
lines :
     •  Sampling and analysis methodology
     •  Accuracy and precision of sampling  and analysis  methodology
     •  Means of assessing the adequacy of  emissions  data  for use in cal-
        culating emission factors.
     0  Implications of the variability of  actual  emission factors for
        calculating source emissions.
     A search of the CCEA data base for information on the emissions of
these pollutants from SCCP produced the following  results:
     •  For Mercury, Beryllium and Fluorides:  a relatively large amount
        of valid data.
     t  For Sulfuric Acid Mist (SOs):   limited data.
     t  For Asbestos, Hydrogen Sulfide, Methyl Mercaptan,  Dimethyl Sulfide,
        Dimethyl Disulfide, Carbon  Disulfide and Carbonyl  Sulfide:  no data.
The discussion in this section will therefore be limited to Mercury, Beryl-
lium, Fluorides, and Sulfuric Acid  Mist ($03).
     It was beyond the scope of  this  effort to review all  pertinent  litera-
ture on sampling and analysis for these four pollutants.   Thus, this section
will briefly describe general, widely used  sampling and  analysis methodo-
logies  and will  then present in  more  detail several examples from the CCEA
information base.
6.1  SAMPLING METHODOLOGY
     There are a limited number  of  widely used methods for sampling  stacks
for particulates and volatiles.   Work  prior to 1971 was  typically performed
with an ASTM specified train (ASTM, 1971).   Since  then,  stack sampling
typically has been performed in  accordance  with EPA's method 5 specifications
(EPA-76).  A stack sampling train now in wide use  is  the Source Assessment
Sampling System (SASS) train, which is required by EPA-IERL on its emissions

                                   72

-------
assessment programs (77.)-  The impinger contents of the ASTM and Method 5
trains were modified by workers who needed to trap volatile inorganic
species.  The SASS train impingers were designed to trap volatile inorganics.
A typical sulfur species sampling train is the Controlled Condensation
System (CCS) (78.).  This train collects particulate sulfate on a heated
filter; SOs, as HgSC^, in a coil maintained at a temperature above the dew
point of H2SC«4; and $62 in a hydrogen peroxide filled impinger.  Some
chlorine and fluorine is trapped in the peroxide impinger, and the reminder
is trapped in a second, sodium carbonate filled impinger.
     Recent reports from the Emissions Assessment of Conventional  Combustion
Systems (EACCS) (1,57.) program have been used in the development of emission
factors discussed in Sections 4.0 and 5.0 of this report.  A major task of
the EACCS program is to evaluate the existing data base.   This evaluation
cited eleven sources of emissions data as being particularly useful.   Three
of these reports will  be used as examples of sampling methodology.
     Bolton, et al.  (5.)  used a standard ASTM train to sample particulate
emissions from the stack and across the electrostatic precipitator of a
coal-fired utility plant.  Samples were taken isokinetically across  the
ducts and stack diameters.  Samples of coal, slag, and other process  streams
were taken by conventional methods (e.g., grade sampling) and composited  >
over the test period.   They also reported on laboratory tests of an  impinger
system for trapping volatile mercury compounds.
     Curtis (8.)  summarized a number of trace element emission studies
performed by Ontario Hydro.  Conventional methods were used to sample
liquid and solid process streams.  Use of a special stack sampling unit for
collecting vapor phase trace elements was mentioned, but no details  were
given.  The stacks were traversed, and sampling was isokinetic.
     Schwitzgebel, et al. (4.)  used conventional methods of sampling liquid
and solid process streams.  They used a wet electrostatic precipitator (WEP)
to sample particulates in the stack.  The WEP was backed up by a standard
Method 5 filter to verify the collection efficiency of the WEP.  Mercury was
sampled by a gold amalgamation technique.  Sulfur species were trapped in
hydrogen peroxide.  Sampling was isokinetic at the required number of
traverse points across the stack diameter.
                                    73

-------
     Shih, et al , (57.)  reported the use of the CCS train for sampling
sulfur species at oil-fired internal combustion sources in the utility and
industrial use sectors.   Sampling with this train on the EACCS program is
performed isokinetically at the point of average velocity.
6.2  ANALYTICAL METHODOLOGY
     Analytical methods  applied to trace pollutant emissions measurements
are also limited.  Neutron activation analysis (NAA) is a multi-element
technique capable of ultratrace levels with high accuracy and precision.
Spark source mass spectrometry (SSMS) is another widely used multi-element
method.  For most elements, SSMS has an accuracy and precision of +_ 50 per-
cent.  Atomic absorption spectroscopy (AAS), both flame and flameless, is  a
single element technique capable of high accuracy and precision at trace
and ultratrace levels.  Titrimetry is commonly used for sulfur species
sampled by the Goksoyr-Ross or CCS trains.  Selective ion electrodes (SIE)
are generally used for halogens.  Selective ion electrodes are capable of
accuracy and precision of about five percent.
     Analytical methods  generally are not the limiting factor in trace
element analysis.  The nature of the sample, sample handling, and parti-
cularly sample preparation can have a significant effect on the overall
accuracy of a sampling and analysis program.  For example, to get reasonable
closure on a materials balance, solid samples (e.g., fly ash) have to be
totally dissolved in order to free trace elements bound in the solid matrix
for analysis.  The usual method for totally dissolving inorganic solids is
with a mixture of strong acids.  Coal samples are usually burned in an
oxygen filled calorimeter (e.g., Parr oxygen bomb) before trace element
analysis.
     Bolton, et al, (5.)  determined mercury by flameless AA, and beryllium
by NAA.  Fluoride and $03 were not determined.  They reported that NAA was
good to five percent for most elements.
     Curtis (8.)  reported that Hg and F were determined by NAA, F by selec-
tive ion electrode, and Be by flameless AA.  Table 6-1 presents the
accuracies given  by Curtis.
                                    74

-------
  TABLE 6-1.  ACCURACIES OF TRACE ELEMENT DETERMINATIONS FROM CURTIS (7)

Element
Be
Hg
F
Coal
+10%
+15%
+ 5%
Bottom Ash
+15%
+15%
+15%
ESP Ash
+15%
+15%
+35%
Post-ESP
+35%
+85%
+55%
Ash Parti oil ate
NA
+15%
+40%

TABLE 6-2. ACCURACIES OF TRACE ELEMENT DETERMINATIONS FROM SCHWITZGEBEL (1975)

Element Coal & Coal Ash Lime Aqueous Samples
Be +12%
Hg +10%
F + 8%
+12%
+10%
+ 8%
+10%
+10%
+ 8%
WEP Liquor
+10%
+20%
+ 8%

     Schwitzgebel et al, (4.)  used AA for Hg and Be and a selective ion
electrode for F.  Table 6-2 presents analytical accuracies reported by
Schwitzgebel.
     Samples from the CCS train are the filter (particulate sulfates), the
coil rinse (SOs as H2S04), the peroxide impinger (S02 as H2S04, Cl, and F),
and the carbonate impinger (Cl and F).  Fluoride is determined by selective
ion electrode.  The filter is extracted to remove sulfates.  The filter
extract and impinger contents are determined by turbidimetry.  The accuracy
of the analyses is ten percent.
6.3  ADEQUACY OF DATA FOR EMISSION FACTOR DEVELOPMENT
     One major task of the EACCS program is the identification of gaps and
inadequacies in the emissions data base for stationary conventional combus-
tion processes (SCCP).  Assessment of the adequacy of emissions data is
performed by considering both the reliability and the variability of the
data.  The general approach to this assessment is a three step one, which
is fully described in the literature (1.) and which is summarized below.
     In Step 1, emissions data are screened for adequate definition of
process, equipment, and fuel parameters.  Also, sampling and analysis
methods are assessed.  If process definition is not adequate or if sampling
                                    75

-------
and analysis methods are not capable of accuracy in the range +_ factor of
three, the data were rejected.  This step eliminates data which would be of
little or no use.
     Step 2 consists of further engineering and statistical  analysis of the
emissions data to determine their internal  consistency and variability-
Emission factors calculated from each pollutant-unit operation pair are
evaluated for consistency by comparison with emission factors from similar
sites.  Emission factors lying outside upper and lower bounds are discarded.
The Method of Dixon, a statistical  technique applicable to the rejection of
single outlying points in a small group of points, is used as the rejection
criterion.
     The variability of emission factors is calculated from
                                 v =
                                       x
where x   is the mean value of the emission factor, s(x) is the estimated
standard  deviation of the mean, and t is the Student "t", the value of
which depends on the degrees of freedom of the mean and the confidence
level desired for the interval containing the true population mean.  For
the EACCS program, values of t are chosen such that the confidence inter-
val is 95 percent.
     Step 3 of the data evaluation process involves a quantitative treat-
ment of the variability of the emission factors to assess their adequacy.
This assessment is based on both the potential  environmental  risks asso-
ciated with the emission of each pollutant and the quality of the existing
emissions data.
6.4  IMPLICATIONS OF EMISSION FACTOR VARIABILITIES FOR EMISSION CALCULATIONS
     Emissions from a particular combustion source are generally calculated
in the following manner:
                         Emissions = (EF)  (F) (H)
where EF is the emission factor, F is the fuel  use rate of the source, and
H is the heating value of the fuel.   The expected uncertainty of the emis-
sion value calculated in this manner depends on the variabilities of all of
the terms in the equation.

                                    76

-------
     In the EACCS program, TRW calculated variabilities for the emission
factors for trace elements and SOs for many combustion source categories.
In Table 6-3 these variabilities have been grouped by fuel type.  Actual '
variabilities greater than 70 percent are not shown, since,,in many cases,
they vary widely among the specific source categories, and since such a
high variability would argue against the use of the emission factor at all.
The 70 percent criterion used in the table is arbitrary; however, the same
variability criterion is used in the EACCS study to measure the adequacy of
the data base for emission factor development.
     Table 6-3 indicates that the variabilities for the beryllium emission
factors are consistently greater than 70 percent for all categories of coal
and oil-burning boilers.  In fact, the actual variabilities are often
several hundred percent for beryllium emissions from coal  combustion (1.).
One must conclude from this that the actual emissions of beryllium from a
given coal-burning source bear little relationship to calculated emission
value for the pertinent source category, based on the existing emission
data (i.e., using one of the factors given in Section 4.1 of this report).
     Emission factors for mercury, on the other hand, have variabilities less
than 70 percent for coal and oil combustion, although the variability for
the mercury emission factor for gas combustion is greater than 70 percent "
(143 percent (1.)).  The emission factor variability for fluorides from
coal combustion is less than 70 percent and for fluorides from oil  combus-
tion is greater than 70 percent (96 percent (1.)).  Variabilities for SOs
emission factors are less than 70 percent for both coal and oil combustion.

        TABLE 6-3.  VARIABILITIES OF CALCULATED EMISSION FACTORS

Fuel -
Coal
Oil
Gas

Mercury
35%-40%
50%
>70%
Variabilities
Beryllium Fluorides
»70% 35%-40%
>70% >70%
NEa NEa

S03
19%
33%
NEa

     Negligible emissions.
     Source:  Shih, et al, 1979 (1.).
                                    77

-------
     It should be noted that variability does not necessarily represent the
accuracy of sampling and analysis methods used.   It more often represents
variation in the parameters used to develop the  emission factors:
        Concentration of element in fuel.
        High heating value of fuel.
For t ace elements only:
        Fraction of ash as fly ash
        Collection efficiency of control  device
        Enrichment factor for the trace element
(See equation in Section 5.1.1).  Most emission factors shown in Section 4
of this report require substitution of the concentration of the element in
the fuel for C in the case of trace elements and for S in the case of sul-
furic acid mist.  The variability of this concentration appears to be
relatively low (1.),  however, and, therefore, is probably not an important
influence on the high variability of the beryllium emission factors.
Instead, it is more likely the variability of the enrichment ratio which
causes high variability in the beryllium emission factors.  (Enrichment
does not occur during emission of mercury, fluorides, and sulfuric acid
mist).  Although enrichment ratios depend on the efficiency of the control
device and the consequent particle size distribution, the relationship
between enrichment ratio and these and other influence parameters is not
known.
     The expected uncertainty of a calculated emission value depends also
on the variabilities of the remaining two terms in the equation quoted
earlier in this section:  the fuel use rate and the heating value of the
fuel.  If it is assumed that the variabilities of these terms are very
small compared to the variability of the emission factor, the following
recommendations can be made, based on the observations in this discussion:
     •  Little confidence can be placed in calculated emission of beryllium
        from any combustion source until  more sampling data are taken and
        better beryllium emission factors are developed.
     •  Calculated emissions of mercury from gas combustion and fluorides
        from oil combustion are somewhat uncertain until better emission
        factors can be developed.
     t  Calculated emissions of mercury, fluorides, and $03 from source
        categories not mentioned in the preceding statement are within the
        range of uncertainty usually anticipated for this type of calcula-
        tion.

                                    78

-------
APPENDIX A:  PERSONS CONTACTED FOR INFORMATION ON TOTAL  REDUCED SULFUR
                      AND REDUCED SULFUR EMISSIONS
              Name                             Affiliation

       David Anderson               TRW
       Steve Cherry                 KVB Inc.
       Dr. Delbert Eatough          Brigham Young University
       Dr. Ed Eimutis  '             Monsanto Research Corporation
       Dr. Warren Hamersma          TRW
       William Henry                Battelle
       Jim Homolya                  EPA/RTP
       Dr. Ralph Perhac             Electric Power Research Institute
       Jake Sommers                 EPA/RTP
       Jim Sutherland               EPA/RTP
                                     79

-------
                                  REFERENCES


 1.   Shih,  C., et  al.  Emissions Assessment of Conventional Combustion
     Systems:  Volume  III, Electricity Generation External Combustion
     Sources.  Draft Report prepared by TRW Inc. for U.S. Environmental
     Protection Agency, October 1979.

 2.   Hillenbrand,  L.J., R.B., Engdahl, and R.E. Barrett.  Chemical Composi-
     tion of  Particulate Air Pollutants from Fossil-Fuel Combustion Sources.
     Report prepared by Battelle Columbus Laboratories for the U.S. Environ-
     mental Protection Agency.  EPA-R2-73-216.  March 1, 1973.

 3.   Mann,  R.M., R.A.  Magee, R.V- Collins, M.R. Fuchs.  Trace Element Study
     of Fly Ash Emissions from Two Coal-Fired Steam Plants Equipped with Hot-
     Side and Cold-Side Electrostatic Precipitators for Particulate Removal.
     Draft  Final Report prepared by Radian Corporation for the U.S. Environ-
     mental Protection Agency.  DCN 78-200-137-06.  February 8,  1978.

 4.   Schwitzgebel, K., F.B. Meserole, R.G. Oldham, R.A. Magee, and F. G.
     Mesich.   Coal-Fired Power Plant Trace Element Study.  Report prepared
     by Radian Corporation for Region VIII of the U.S. Environmental Protec-
     tion Agency.   Volumes I and II.  September 1975.

 5.   Bolton,  N.E., R.I. Van Hook, W. Fulkerson, W.S. Lyon, A.M.  Andren, J.A.
     Carter,  J.F.  Emery.  Trace Element Measurements at the Coal-Fired Allen
     Steam  Plant.   Oak Ridge National Laboratory.  NSF-EP-43.  March 1973.

 6.   Kaakinen, J.W., R.M. Jorden, M. H. Lawasani, and R.E. West.  Trace
     Element  Behavior  in Coal-Fired Power Plants.  Environmental Science &
     Technology 9(9):  862-869.  September 1975.

 7.   Gordon,  G.E., D.D. Davis, G.W. Israel, H.E. Landsberg, T.C. O'Haver,
     S.W. Staley,  and  W. H. Zoller.  Study of the Emissions from Major Air
     Pollution Sources and Their Atmospheric Interactions.  Report prepared
     by the University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland for the National
     Science  Foundation for the period November  1, 1972 - October 31, 1974.

 8.   Curtis,  K.E.   Trace Element Emissions from  the Coal-Fired Generating
     Stations of Ontario Hydro.  Ontario Hydro Research Division.  Report No.
     77-156-K.  April  7, 1977.

 9.   Cowherd, C.,  M. Marcus, C.M. Guenther, and  J. L. Spigarelli. Hazardous
     Emission Characterization of Utility Boilers.  Report prepared by the
     Midwest  Research  Institute for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
     EPA-650/2-75-066. July 1975.

10.   Lee, R.E. Jr., H.L. Crist, A.E. Riley, and  K.E. MacLeod.  Concentration
     and Size of Trace Metal Emissions from a Power Plant, a Steel Plant,
     and a  Cotton  Gin. Environmental Science &  Technology 9(7);  643-747.
     July  1975.
                                    80

-------
11.  Ragaini, R.C., and J.M. Ondov.  Trace Contaminants from Coal-Fired
     Power Plants. Lawrence Liver-more Laboratory.  UCRL-76794, September 22,
     1975.

12.  Oglesby, S. Jr., D. Teixeira.  A survey of Technical  Information Related
     to Fine-Particle Control.  Report prepared by Southern Research Institute
     for the Electric Power Research Institute.  RP 259.  April  1975.

13.  Billings, C.E., A.M. Sacco, W.R. Matson, R.M. Griffin, W.R.  Coniglio,
     and R.A. Harley.  Mercury Balance on a Large  Pulverized Coal-Fired
     Furnance.  Journal of the Air Pollution Control  Association  23(9): 773-
     777. No. 9.  September 1973.

14.  Ctvrtnicek, T.E. and S.J. Rusek.  Applicability  of NOX Combustion Modi-
     fications to Cyclone Boilers  (Furnaces).  Report prepared by the
     Monsanto Research Corporation for the U.S. Environmental Protection
     Agency.   EPA-600/7-77-006.   January 1977.   NTIS  PB-264 960.

15.  Crawford, A.R., E.H. Manny, and W.  Bartok. Field Testing:   Application
     of Combustion Modifications to Control  NOx Emissions  from Utility
     Boilers.  Report prepared by  EXXON  Research and  Engineering  Company for
     the U.S. Environmental  Protection Agency.   EPA-650/2-74-066.  June 1974.

16.  Crawford, A.R., E.H. Manny, M.W. Gregory,  and W. Bartok.  The Effects
     of Combustion Modification  on Pollutants and  Equipment Performance of
     Power Generation Equipment.  Proceedings of the  Stationary Source Com-
     bustion  Symposium, Vol.  Ill,  Session IV, Field Testing and Surveys.
     EPA-600/2-76-152c.   June 1976.

17.  Source Inventory and Emission Factor Analysis, Vol. I.   Report prepared
     by PEDCo-Environmental  Specialists, Inc. for  the U.S.  Environmental
     Protection Agency.   EPA-450/3-75-082a.   September 1974.

18.  Burton,  J., G.  Erskine,  E.  Jamgochian,  J.  Morris, R.  Reale,  and W.
     Wheaton.  Baseline Measurement Test Results for  the Cat-Ox Demonstra-
     tion Program.  Report prepared by the Mitre Corp. for the U.S.  Environ-
     mental Protection Agency.  EPA-R2-73-189.   April 1973.

19.  Test Report, Nevada Power Company Reid Gardner Station,  Unit No.  3.
     Prepared by Steams-Roger,  Inc. for Combustion Equipment Associates,
     Inc., December 29, 1976.

20.  Performance Guarantee and Compliance Tests for CEA Scrubber  Units 1 and
     2  located at Reid Gardner Generating Station, Nevada  Power Company,
     Moapa, Nevada.   Prepared by York Research  Corporation  for Nevada Power
     Company.  September 3,  1975.

21.  Bradway, R.M. and D.F.  Durocher. Organic and  Sulfate  Sampling Analysis
     at Colbert Steam Plant.   Report prepared by GCA/Technology Division for
     the U.S. Environmental  Protection Agency.   GCA-TR-36G.   March 1977.
                                     81

-------
22.   Cuffe, S.T.  and R.W.  Gerstle.   Emissions  from Coal-Fired Power Plants:
     A Comprehensive Summary.   U.S.  Department of Health, Education and
     Welfare, Bureau of Disease Prevention and Environmental  Control.   Cin-
     cinnati , Ohio.  1967.

23.   National Coal Resources Data System, Office of Energy Resources,  U.S.
     Geological Survey.  1979.

24.   Magee, E.M., H.J.  Hall, and G.M.  Varga, Jr. Potential Pollutants  in
     Fossil Fuels.  Report prepared  by ESSO for the U.S.  Environmental Pro-
     tection Agency.  EPA-R-2-73-249.   June 1973.

25.   Ray, S.S. and F.G. Parker.  Characterization of Ash  from Coal-Fired
     Power Plants.  Report prepared  by the Tennessee Valley Authority for
     the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.  EPA-600/7-77-010.  Jan. 1977.

26.   Gluskoter, H.J., R.R. Ruch, W.G.  Miller, R.A. Cahill, G.B. Dreher, and
     J.K.  Kuhn.  Trace Elements in Coal:Occurrence and Distribution. Illinois
     State Geological Survey, Circ.  499.   1977.

27.   Kessler, T., A.G. Sharkey, Jr., and R.A. Friedel.  Analysis of Trace
     Elements in Coal by Spark-Source Mass Spectrometry.   U.S. Department of
     the Interior, Bureau of Mines.   RI-7714.   1973.

28.   Hamersma, J.W., M.L.  Kraft, C.A.  Flegal, A.A. Lee, and R.A. Meyers.
     Applicability of the Meyers Process  for Chemical Desulfurization  of
     Coal: Initial Survey of Fifteen Coals.  Report prepared by TRW, Inc. for
     the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. EPA-650/2-74-025. April 1974.

29.   Abernethy, R.F. and F.H. Gibson.   Method for Determination of Fluorine
     in Coal. U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Mines, RI 7054, 1967.

30.   O'Gorman, J.V. and P.L. Walker, Jr.  Mineral Matter Characteristics of
     Some  American Coals.   Fuel 50(2):   136-151.  April 1971.

31.   Attari, A., J. Pau, and M. Mensinger.  Fate of Trace and Minor Consti-
     tuents of Coal During Gasification.   Report prepared by Institute of
     Gas Technology for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.  EPA-600/
     2-76-258.  September 1976.

32.   Fruchter, J.S., M.R.  Petersen,  J.C.  Laul, P.W. Ryan.  High Precision
     Trace Element and Organic Constituent Analysis of Oil Shale and Solvent-
     Refined Coal Materials.  Report prepared by Battelle Pacific Northwest
     Laboratories for the Energy Research and Development Administration
     under Contract E(45-l) 1830.  November 1976.

33.   Forney, A.J., W.P. Haynes, S.J. Gasior, R.M. Kornosky, C.E. Schmidt,
     A.G., Sharkey.  Trace Element and Major Component Balances Around the
  ,   Synthane PDU Gasifier.  Pittsburgh  Energy  Research Center.  PERC/TPR
     75-1.  August 1975.
                                     82

-------
34.  Sommerville, M.H., J.L. Elder, R.G. Todd.  Trace Elements, Analysis of
     Their Potential Impact from a Coal Gasification Facility.  JJT_ Proceed-
     ings of the Grand Forks Energy Research Center, Department of Energy,
     1977 Symposium on Lignite.

35.  Zubovic, P., N.B. Sheffey, and T. Stadnichenko.  Distribution of Minor
     Element in Some Coals in the Western and Southwestern Regions of the
     Interior Coal Province.  Geological Survey Bulletin 117-D.  1967

36.  Deul, M. and C. S. Annell.  The Occurence of Minor Elements in Ash of
     Low-Rank Coal from Texas, Colorado, North Dakota and South Dakota.
     Geological Survey Bulletin 1036-H, 1956.

37.  Ruch, R.R., H.J. Gluskoter, and N.F. Shimp.   Occurrence and Distribu-
     tion of Potentially Volatile Trace Elements  in Coal.  Illinois State
     Geological Survey..  EPA/650/2-74-054.   1974.

38.  Ruch, R.R., H.J. Gluskoter, and N.F. Shimp.   Occurrence and Distribu-
     tion of Potentially Volatile Trace Elements  in Coal.  Illinois State
     Geological Survey, Note #61, Interim Report.

39.  Swanson, Vernon E.  Composition and Trace Element Content of Coal  and
     Power Plant Ash.  Part 2, Appendix J of Southwest Energy Study.   U.S.
     Department of Interior Open-file report.  1972.

40.  O'Gorman, J.V.  and P.L. Walker, Jr.  Mineral  Matter and Trace Elements
     in U.S.  Coals.   Report prepared by the Pennsylvania State University
     for the Office  of Coal Research, U.S.  Department of Interior.   R&D
     Report No. 61.   1972.

41.  Abernethy, R.F. and F.H. Gibson.  Rare Elements in Coal. U.S.  Bureau of
     Mines.  Bureau  of Mines Information Circular No. 8163.   1963.

42.  Attari, A.  Fate of Trace Constituents of Coal During Gasification.
     Report prepared by the Institute of Gas Technology for the U.S.  Environ-
     mental Protection Agency.  EPA-650-2-73-004.   August 1973.

43.  Von Lehmden, D.J., R.H. Jungers, and R.E. Lee, Jr.  Determination  of
     Trace Elements  in Coal, Fly Ash, Fuel  Oil, and Gasoline—A Preliminary
     Comparison of Selected Analytical Techniques.  Analytical Chemistry
     46(2):  239-245.  February 1974.

44.  Holland, W.F.,  K.A. Wilde, J.L. Parr,  P.S. Lowell, and R.F. Pholer.
     The Environmental Effects of Trace Elements  in the Pond Disposal of  Ash
     and Flue Gas Desulfurization Sludge.  Report prepared by Radian  Corpora-
     tion for the Electric Power Research Institute.  September 8,  1975.

45.  Yeh, J.T., C.R. McCann, J.J. Demeter,  and D.  Bienstock.  Removal of
     Toxic Trace Elements from Coal Combustion Effluent Gas.  Pittsburgh
     Energy Research Center.  PERC/RI-76/5.  September 1976.
                                     83

-------
46.  Carter, J.A., R.L. Walker, and J.R. Sites.  Trace Impurities in Fuels
     by Isotope Dilution Mass Spectrometry.  American Chemical Society,
     Division of Fuel Chemistry, Preprints of Papers.  18(4):  78-91.  1973.

47.  Diehl, R.C., E.A.  Hattman, H.  Schultz, and R.J.  Haren.   Fate of Trace
     Mercury in the Combustion of Coal.   U.S. Bureau  of Mines.  TPR 54.
     May 1972.

48.  Coles, D.G., R.C.  Ragaini, and J.M. Ondov.  The  Behavior of the Natural
     Radionuclides in Western Coal-Fired Power Plants.  American Chemical
     Society, Division  of Fuel Chemistry, Preprints of Papers.  22(4):
     156-161.  1977.

49.  Fisher, G.L., B.A. Prentice, D.  Silberman, J.M.  Ondov,  R.C. Ragaini,
     A.H.  Bierman, A.R. McFarland and J.B. Pawley.  Size-dependence of the
     Physical and Chemical  Properties of Coal Fly Ash.  American Chemical
     Society, Division  of Fuel Chemistry, Preprints of Papers.  (22(4):
     149-155.  1977.

50.  Schultz, H., E.A.  Hattman, and W.B. Booher.   The Fate of Some Trace
     Elements During  Coal Pretreatment and Combustion.  American Chemical
     Society, Division  of Fuel Chemistry, Preprints of Papers. 18(4): 108-
     111.   1973.

51.  Sheibley, D.W.  Trace  Element  Analysis of Coal by Neutron Activation.
     Lewis Research Center, NASA TM-X-68208.   1973.

52.  Wewerka, E.M., J.M. Williams,  P.L.  Wanek, and J.D.  Olsen.  Environmental
     Contamination from Trace Elements in Coal Preparation Wastes.  Report
     prepared by  Los  Alamos Scientific Laboratory for the U.S. Environmental
     Protection Agency, EPA 600/7-76-007.  August 1976.

53.  Wewerka, E.M., J.M. Williams,  N.E.  Vanderborgh,  P.  Wagner, P.L. Wanek,
     J.D.  Olsen.   Trace Element Characterization and Removal/Recovery  from
     Coal  and Coal Wastes.   Report  prepared by Los Alamos Scientific Lab-
     oratory for  the  U.S. Environmental  Protection Agency.  LA 6933PR.
     March 15, 1977.

54.  Wangen, L.E. and C. L. Wienke.   A Review of Trace Element Studies
     Related to Coal  Combustion in  the Four Corners Area of New Mexico.  Los
     Alamos Scientific  Laboratory.   LA-6401-MS.  July 1976.

55.  1977  Keystone Coal Industry Manual.  McGraw-Hill Inc.,  New York, New
     York.
                                     84

-------
 56.  Surprenant.N.;  R. Hall, S. Slater, T. Susa, M. Sussman, and C. Young.
     Preliminary Emissions Assessment of Conventional Stationary Combustion
     Systems; Volume II- Final Report.  Report prepared by GCA/Technology
     Division for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.  EPA-600/2-76-
     046B. March 1976. NTIS PB-252 175.

 57.  Shih, C.C., J.W. Hammersma, D.G. Ackerman, R.E. Beimer, M.L.Kraft,
     and M.M. Yamada.  Emissions Assessment of Conventional Stationary
     Combustion Systems; Volume II.  Internal Combustion Sources. Report
     prepared by TRW, Inc. for U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
     EPA-600/7-79-029C. February 1979.

 58.  Howes, James E.  Sulfur Oxide Measurements of Utility Power Plant
     Emissions.  Workshop Proceedings on Primary Sulfate Emissions from
     Combustion Sources, Volume II. EPA-600/9-78-020b.  August 1978.

 59.  Doyle, Brian W. and Richard C. Booth.  Some Recent Data on SOs and
     S04 Levels in Utility Boilers.  Workshop Proceedings on Primary
     Sulfate Emissions for Combustion Sources, Volume II. EPA-600/9-78-
     020b.  August 1978.

 60.  Johnson, R.H.   Gas Turbine Environmental Factors; General
     Electric Co.  Paper GER-2486B.  Schenectady, New York.  1973.

 61.  Hurley, J.F. and S. Hersh.  Effect of Smoke and Corrosion Suppressant
     Additives on Particulate and Gaseous  Emissions from a Utility Gas
     Turbine:  Report prepared by KVB Inc. for Electric Power Research
     Institute.   EPRI FP-398.   March  1977.

 62.  Hunter, S.C. and P.K.  Engel.   Sulfur Oxides from Boilers, Turbines
     and Industrial  Combustion Equipment.   InrWorkshop Proceedings on
     Primary Sulfate Emissions from Combustion Sources.  Vol. 2 - Char-
     acterization.   EPA-600/9-78-020b.   August 1978.

 63.  Kircher, J.F.  et al.   A survey of Sulfate, Nitrate, and Acid Aerosol
     Emissions and  Their Control.   EPA-600/7-77-041.  Batelle-Columbus
     Labs for U.S.  Environmental  Protection Agency, Research Triangle
     Park, N.C., April  1977.

 64.  Scinto, L.L.  Primary Sulfate Emissions from Coal and Oil Combustion.
     Rough Draft.  Prepared for Environmental Protection Agency by TRW, Inc.
     EPA Contract No. 68-02-3138.   August 1979.

 65.  McCurley, W.R.  and D.G.  De Angelis.  Measurement of Sulfur Oxides from
     Coal-fired Utility and Industrial  Boilers.  InrWorkshop Proceedings
     on Primary Sulfate Emissions from CombustionTources, Volume 2.  U.S.
     Environmental  Protection Agency.  1978.

66.  Eimutis, E.C.,  R.P, Quill, and G,M. Rinaldt, Source Assessment;  Non-
     criteria Pollutant Emissions,   EPA-600/2-78-004t, July 1978.
                                     85

-------
67.   Dietz, R.N.  R.F.  Wieser, and L.  Newman.   Operating Parameters Affecting
     Sulfate Emissions from an Oil-fired Power Unit.   ^Workshop Proceed-
     ings on Primary Sulfate Emissions from Combustion Sources, Volume 2.
     U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, N.C.,
     1978.

68.   Homolya, J.G., H.M. Barnes, and C.R. Fortune.  A Characterization of
     the Gaseous Sulfur Emissions from Coal and Oil-fired Boilers.  In:
     Proceedings of the 4th National  Conference on Energy and the
     Environment, Cincinnati, Ohio.  October 1976.

69.   National Inventory of Sources and Emissions, Asbestos, Section III.
     Leawood, W.E. Davis and Associates.  National Air Pollution  Control
     Administration Contract Number CPA 22-69-131.  February 1970.

70.   Communication with Philip Cook, National Water Quality Laboratory,
     Environmental Protection Agency, Duluth, Minnesota, January  1980.

71.   Communication with Bob Clifton, Bureau of Mines, Washington, D.C.
     January 1980.

72.   Control Techniques for Asbestos Air Pollutants, prepared by  Environ-
     mental Protection Agency, Office of Air Quality Planning and
  -  Standards.  February 1973.

73.   Background  Information on National Emission Standards for Hazardous
     Air Pollutants - Proposed Amendments to Standards for Asbestos and
     Mercury, prepared by Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air
     Quality Planning and Standards.   October 1974.

74.   Hamersma, J.W.,  D.G. Ackerman, M.M. Yamada, C.A. Zee, C.Y. Ung,
     H.T.  McGregor, J.F. Clausen, M.L. Kraft, J.S. Shipiro, E.L.  Moon.
     Emissions Assessment of Conventional Stationary Combustion Systems:
     Methods and Procedures Manual for Sampling and Analysis.  Prepared
     for Environmental Protection Agency.  EPA-600/7-79-029a. January  1979.

75.   ASTM  (71).  Standard Method for Sampling Stacks for Particulate Matter.
     ASTM  Designation D2928-71, January 8, 1971.

76.   EPA  (76).   Method 5 - Determination of Particulate Emission  from
     Stationary  Sources. 41 CFR, 111, pp. 23076-23083, Tuesday, June 8,  1976.

77.   Hamersma, J.W.,  S.L. Reynolds, and R.F. Maddalone.  IERL-RTP Procedures
     Manual; Level I  Environmental Assessment, EPA-600/2-76-160a, June 1976.

78.   Maddalone,  R.F.  and N. Garner.  Process Measurement Procedures:
     Sulfurice Acid Measurement.  TRW Document No. 28055-6004-Ru-Ol, EPA
     Contract No. 68-02-2165, May 1977.

79.   Eimutis, E.C.  Source Assessment: Prioritization of Stationary Air
    1 Pollution Sources - Model Description.  EPA-600/2-76-032a, February
     1976.
                                     86

-------
 80.   Maloney,  K.L.,  P.K.  Engel,  S.S.  Cherry.  Sulfur Retention  in Coal
      Ash.   KVB Inc.,  Report  No.  EPA-600/7-78-1536, November 1978.

 81.   Waibel, R.T., E.S.  Fleming,  D.H. Larson.  Pollutant Emissions from
       Dirty' Low- and Medium-Btu  Gases.   Institute of Gas Technology,
      Applied Combustion  Research, Report  No. EPA-600/7-78-191,  October 1978.

 82.   Pellizzari, Edo  D.   Identification of Components of Energy-Related
      Wastes and Effluents.   Research  Triangle Institute, Report No. EPA-
      600/7-78-004, January 1978.

 83.   Henry, William M.  Methods for Analyzing Inorganic Compounds in
      Particulates Emitted from Stationary Sources.  Interim Report,
      EPA-600/7-79-200, September  1979.

 84.   Bidstrup, P.L.,  J.A. Bonnell, D.G. Harvey, and S. Lockets.  Chronic
      Mercury Poisoning in Men Repairing Direct-Current Meters,  Lancet
      2:856-861, 1951.

 85.   Boney, A.D.  Sublethal Effects of Mercury on Marine Algae.  Mar.
      Pollut. Bull.  2:69-71, 1971.

 86.   Boney, A.D., and E.D.S. Corner.  Application of Toxic Agents in the
      Study of the Ecological Resistance of Interstitial red algae.  J. Mar.
      Biol. Assoc., U.K.  38:267 - 275, 1959.

 87.   Burton, G.V., R.J. Alley, G.L. Rasmussen, P. Orton, V. Cox, P. Jones
      and D. Graff.  Mercury and Behavior in Wild Mouse Populations.  Environ,
      Res., 14:30-31,   1977.

 88.   D'ltri, P.M.   The Environmental Mercury Problem.   CRC Press, The
      Chemical Rubber Company, 1972.

 89.   Fraser, A.M., K.I. Melville, and R.L. Stehle.  Mercury-Laden Air:  The
     Toxic Concentration, the Proportion Absorbed and the Urinary
      Excretion.  J.  Indus. Health, 16:77, 1934.

 90.   Friberg, L. and D. Vostal.  Mercury in the Environment, An Fnidemir-
     Togical  and Toxicological  Aporaisal.   CRC Press,  Cleveland, Ohio, 19/2.

 91.  Goncharuk, G.A.   Problems Relating to Occupational Hygiene of Women
      in Production of Mercury.  Gig. Tr. Prof. Zabol,  (5):17-20 (Russ.),
     1977.

 92.  Jensen, S., and A. Jernelev.  Biological Methylation of Mercury in
     Aquatic Organisms. Nature, 223:753 -74,  1969.

 93.  Khera, K.S. Reproductive Capability of Male Rats  and Mice Treated with
     Methyl Mercury,  Toxicol. Appl. Pharm. 24:167-177, 1973.

94.  National Research Council.  An Assessment of Mercury in  the
     Environment.   National Academy of Sciences,  Washington,  D.C.,  1978.
                                     87

-------
 95.  Neal, P.A., R.H. Flinn, T.I.  Edwards, W.H. Reinhart, J.W. Hough,
      J.M. Dallavalle, F.H.  Goldman, D.W.  Armstrong, A.S.  Gray, A.L. Coleman,
      and B.F. Postman.  Mercurial ism and  Its Control in the Felt Hat
      Industry.   Public Health Bulletin 263, U.S.  Public Health Service, 1941,

 96.  Neal, P.A., R.R. Jones, J.J.  Bloomfield, J.J.  Dallavalle, and T.I.
      Edwards.  Study of Chronic Mercurial ism in the Hatters'  Fur-Cutting
      Industry.   Public Health Bulletin 234, U.S.  Public Health Service, 1937.

 97.  Nelson, N., T.  Byerly,  A.  Kolbye, C.  Kurland,  R.  Shapiro, S.  Shibko,
      W. Stickel, J.  Thompson, L.  Van Den  Berg, and  A.  Werssler.   Hazards of
      Mercury, Special Report to the U.S.H.E.W. Secretary's Advisory
      Committee,  Environmental Res.  4:1-69, 1971.

 98.  Newberne,  P.M., 0.  Glaser and L.  Friedman.  Chronic  Exposure  of Rats
      to Methylmercury in Fish Protein. Nature 237:40-41, 1972.

 99.  Potter, L., D.  Kidd, and D.  Standiford.   Mercury Levels  in  Lake Powell,
      Broamplification of Mercury  in Man-made Desert Reservoir.   Environ.
      Sci. Tech., 9:41-46, 1975.

100.  Ramel,  C.   Genetic Effects,  L. Fribery and G.  Vostal, eds., In:
      Mercury in  the  Environment,  An Epidermiological and  Toxicological
      Appraisal,  p.  169-181,  CRC Press, Cleveland, Ohio, 1972.

101.  Kournossov, V.N.  Some  Evidence to Form a Basis for  a Threshold
      Value for Hercury in Air,  Gig. Sanit.  1:7, 1962.


102.  Skerfving,  S.,  J. Vostal.   Symptoms  and Signs  of Intoxication.
      L. Friberg  and  J. Vostal,  eds., In:  Mercury  in the Environment, An Epi-
      dermiological  and Toxicological Appraisal, p.  93-107, CRC Press,
      Cleveland,  Ohio, 1972.

103.  Smith,  R.G., A.J. Vorwald and T.F. Mooney.  Effects  of Exposure to
      Mercury in  the  Manufacture of Chlorine.   Amer. Ind.  Hyg.  Assoc. J.,
      31:687-700, 1970.

104.  Turrian, H., E. Grandjean, and V. Turrian.  Industrial Hygiene and
      Medical Studies in Mercury Plants, Schweiz.  Med.  Wachenschr., 86:
      1091-94, 1956.

105.  Breslin, A.J.   Exposures and Patterns of Disease in  the  Beryllium
      Industry.   Beryllium,  Its Industrial  Hygiene Aspects. H.E. Stokinger
      ed., Academic  Press, New York.  American Industrial  Hygiene Association
      and U.S. Atomic Energy  Commission, p. 23. 1966.

106.  Deodhar, S.D.,  B. Barna, and H.S. Van Ordstrand.   A Study of the
      Immunologic Aspects of  Chronic Berylliosis.  Chest 63(3):309-313,  1973.

107.  Eisenbud,  M.,  C.F.  Berghaut,  L.T. Steadman.  Environmental  Studies in
      Plant and Laboratories  Using Beryllium:  The  Acute Disease.   J. Ind.
      Hyg. Toxicol.  30(5):281-285,  1948.

                                     88

-------
108.  Midttun, 0.  Bronchial Asthma in the Aluminum Industry, Acta Allergol.
      15:208-21, 1960.

109.  Leloczky, M.  Health Effects of the Fluorine Pollution of the Air
      Around the Aluminum Foundry of the Inota (Hungary).  Epeszseatudomany
      15: (Supplement) 74-80, 1970.

110.  Hardy, H.L., L.B. Tepper.  Beryllium Disease - A review of Current
      Knowledge.  J. Occup.  Med. 1:219-224, 1959.

111.  Lieben, J. and R.R. Williams.  Respiratory Disease Associated with
      Beryllium Refining and Alloy Fabrication; Follow-up.   J.  Occup.  Med.
      11:480-485, 1969.

112.  Mancuso, T.F.   Relation of Duration of Employment and Prior Respira-
      tory Illness to Respiratory Cancer Among Beryllium Workers.   Environ.
      Res. 3:251-275, 1970.

113.  National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health.   Criteria for
      a Recommended Standard, Occupational  Exposure to Beryllium.   U.S.
      Dept.  of Health, Education and Welfare, p.  IV-19, NIOSH,  Cincinnati,
      Ohio,  1972.

114.  Reeves, A.L.  Beryllium in the Environment.   Clin.  Toxicol.
      10(l):37-48, 1977-

115.  Reeves, A.L.,  D. Dietch, and A.J.  Vorwald.   Beryllium Carcinogenesis.
      Inhalation Exposure of Rats to Beryllium Sulfate Aerosol.   Cancer Res.
      27:439-445, 1977.

116.  Schepers, 6.W.H., T.M. Durkan, A.B. Delahant, and F.T.  Creedon.   The
      Biological Action of Inhaled Beryllium Sulfate, A Preliminary Chronic
      Toxicity Study on Rats.  A.M.A. Arch. Ind.  Health,  15:32-58, 1957.

117   Spencer, H.C., R.H. Hook, J.A. Blumenshine,  S.B. McAllister, S.E.
      Sadek, and J.C. Jones.  lexicological Studies on beryllium oxides and
      Beryllium Containing Exhaust Products.  Aerospace Medical  Research
      Laboratories,  Air Force Systems Command, AMRL-TR-68-148,  Wright-
      Patterson AFB, Ohio, 1968.

118.  Sterner, J.H., and M.  Eisenbud.  Epidemiology of Beryllium Intoxica-
      tion Arch. Ind. Hyg. 4:123-151, 1951.

119.  Stokinger, H.E., G.F.  Sprague,  R.H.  Hall, N.J. Ashenburg, O.K.  Scott,
      L.T. Steadman.  Acute Inhalation Toxicity of Beryllium. I. Four  Defini-
      tive Studies of Beryllium Sulfate at Exposure Concentrations of  100,
      50, 10 and 1 mg. per Cubic Meter.   Arch. Ind. Hyg.  Occup.  Med. 1(4):
      379-397, 1950.
                                     39

-------
120.   Stokinger,  H.E.,  C.J.  Spiegel,  R.E.  Root,  R.H.  Hall,  L.T.  Steadman,
      C.A.  Stroud,  J.K.  Scott,  F.A.  Smith  and D.F.  Gardner.   Acute Inhala-
      tion  Toxicity of  Beryllium,  IV.   Beryllium Fluoride at Exposure Con-
      centrations of One and Ten Milligrams  per  Cubic Meter A.M.A. Arch.
      Ind.  Tyg.  Occup.  Med., 8:493,  1953.

121.   Vorwald, A.J., and A.L. Reeves.   Pathological Changes Induced by
      Beryllium Compound.  A.M.A. Arch.  Ind.  Health, 19:190-199,  1959.

122.   Enterline,  P.E.,  and V. Henderson.   Type of Asbestos and Respiratory
      Cancer in the Asbestos Industry,  Arch.  Environ. Health, 27:312-317,
      1973.

123.   Levine, R.J.  (ed.).   Asbestos:  An Information Resource, DHEW Publi-'
      cation No.  (NIH)  79-1681, 1978.

124.   Murphy, R.H., G.C. Ferris, Jr., W.A.  Burgess, J.  Worcester, and E.A.
      Gaensler.   Effects of Low Concentrations of Asbestos, N. Engl.  J.
      Med.  285:1271, 1971.

125.   National Cancer Institute.  Asbestos:  An Information Resource,
      National Institute of Health,  DHEW  Publication No.  (NIH) 79-1681,
      Bethesda, MD.

126.   National Institute for Occupational  Safety and Health.  Revised
      Recommended Asbestos Standard,  U.S.  Government Printing Office, DHEW
      (NIOSH) publication  No. 77-169, Washington, D.C., 1976.

127.   Baikov, B.  K. Hygienic Effect  of  Carbon Bisulfide and Hydrogen  Sulfide
      Simultaneously Present in Atmospheric  Air  - microfiche translation  from
      Russian, Information Systems,  Inc.,  Omaha, Nebraska.  1974.

128.   Schneiderman, M.A.  Digestive  System Cancer Among Persons  Subjected
      to Occupational Inhalation of  Asbestos  Particles: A Literature
      Review with Emphasis on Dose Response.  Environ. Health Perspect.
      9:307-311,  1974.

129.   Selikoff, I.J., and D.H.  Lee,  Asbestos  and Disease.  Academic
      Press, New York,  1978.

130.   Adams, D.F., C.G. Shaw, and W.D.  Terkes, Jr.   Relationship of Injury
      Indexes and Fumigation Fluoride Levels.  Phytopathology 46:587-591,
      1956.

131.   Agate, I.N., G.H. Bell, G.F. Boddie, et al.  A Study of the Hazard
      to Man and Animals Near Fort William,  Scotland.  Med. Res. Council
      Memorandum No. 22.  H.M.  Stationery Office, London, 1949.

132.   Elkins, H.B.  The Chemistry of Industrial  Toxicology, 2nd Edition,
      p. 71-73, John Wiley and Sons,  Inc., New York, 1959.

133.   Hill, A.C., M.R.  Pack, L.G.  Transbrum and W.S. Winters.  Effects of
      Atmospheric Fluorides and Various Types of Injury on the Respiration
      of A Leaf Tissue.  Plant Physio!.,  34:11-16, 1959.
                                     90

-------
134.  Hitchcock, A.E., L.H. Weinstein, D.C. McClune, and J.S. Jacobson.
      Effects of Fluorine Compounds on Vegetation, with Special Reference
      to Sweet Corn.  J. Air. Pollut. Contr. Assoc. 14:503-508, 1964.

135.  Hobbs, C.S., and G.M. Merriman.  Fluorosis in Beef Cattle.  Tennessee
      Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin 351.  Knoxville Univer.
      Tennessee, 1962.

136.  Hodge, H.C., and F.A. Smith.  Occupational Fluoride Exposure.
      0. Occup.  Med. 19:12-39, 1977.

137.  Jacobson,  J.S., L.H.  Weinstein, D.C. McClune, and A.E.  Hitchcock.
      The Accumulation of Fluorine by Plants.  J. Air Pollut.  Contr. Assoc.
      16:412-416, 1966.

138.  Kaltreider, N.L.,  M.J.  Elder, L.U.  Cralley, and M.O.  Calwell.  Health
      Survey of Aluminum Workers with Special  Reference to Fluoride Exposure.
      J. Occup.  Med. 14:531-541, 1972.

139.  Khnuygin,  U.L., and R.A. Shamsutdinova.   Air Pollution  by a Super-
      phosphate  Plant.  Gig.  I.  Sanit. 35:85-87, 1970.

140.  National  Institute for Occupational  Safety and Health.   Criteria  for
      a Recommended Standard.   Occupational Exposure to Hydrogen Fluoride.
      pp. 181,  U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., 1976.

141.  Pack, M.R.   Response of Strawberry Fruiting to Hydrogen Fluoride
      Fumigation.  J. Air Pollut. Contr.  Assoc. 22:714-717, 1972.

142.  Pack, M.R., and C.W.  Sulzbach.  Response of Plant Fruiting to
      Hydrogen  Fluoride  Fumigation.  Atmos. Environ. 10:73-81, 1976.

143.  Pierce, A.W.  Studies on Fluorosis of Sheep. III. The Toxicity of
      Water Borne Fluoride for the Grazing Sheep Throughout Its Life.
      Aust. J.  Agr. Res. 10:186-198, 1959.

144.  Shupe, J.L., M.L.  Miner, L.E. Harris and D.A. Greenwood.  Relative
      Effects of Feeding Hay Atmospherically Contaminated by  Fluoride Resi-
      due, Normal Hay Plus Calcium Fluoride, and Normal Hay Plus Sodium
      Fluoride  to Dairy  Heifers.  Amer. J. Vet. Res. 23:777-787, 1962.

145.  Stoddard,  G.E., G.Q.  Bateman, L.E.  Harris, J.L.  Shupe and D.A.
      Greenwood.   Effects of Fluorine on Dairy Cattle.   IV. Milk Production.
      J. Dairy  Sci.  46:720-726.  1963a.

146.  Stoddard,  G.E., L.E.  Harris, G.Q. Bateman, J.L.  Shupe,  and D.A.
      Greenwood.   Effects of Fluorine on Dairy Cattle.  I.  Growth and Feed
      Consumption. J. Dairy Sci. 46:1094-1102, 1963b

147   Suttie, J.W., R.F- Miller, and P.H.  Phillips.  Effects  of Dietary NaF
      on Dairy  Cows. II.  Effects on Milk Production.  J.  Dairy Sci.
      40:1485-1491., 1957.
                                     SI

-------
148.  Weinstein, L.H.  1977-   Fluoride and Plant Life.   J.  Occup.  Med.
      19:49-78, 1977.

149.  Yu, M.H., and G.W.  Miller.   Effects of Fluoride  on  the Respiration
      of Leaves from Higher  Plants.   Plant Cell.  Physio!.   8:483-493,  1967.

150.  Amdur,  M.O.   Toxicologic  Appraisal  of Particulate Matter, Oxides of
      Sulfur, and  Sulfuric Acid.  J.  Air Poll.  Contr. Assoc.  19(9):638-644,
      1969.

151.  Amdur,  M.O., J.  Boyler, and V.  Ugro.   Respiratory Response  of Guinea
      Pigs to Sulfuric Acid  and Sulfate Salts.   Symposium on Sulfur Pollu-
      tion and Research Approaches,  Duke University, 1975.

152.  Amdur,  M.O., R.Z. Shultz, and  P.  Drinker.   Toxicity of Sulfuric  Acid
      Mist to Guinea Pigs. Arch.  Ind. Hyg.  5:318-329,  1952.

153.  Amdur,  M.O., V.  Silverman,  and P.  Drinker.   Inhalation of Sulfuric
      Acid Mist by Human Subjects. Arch.  Ind.  Hyg.  Occup.  Med. 6:305-313,
      1952.

154.  Anfield, B.D., and C.G. Warner.  A Study of Industrial Mists  contain-
      ing Sulphuric Acid.  Ann. Occup.  Hyg.  11:185-194, 1968.

155.  Bushtueva, K.A.   Experimental  Studies  on the  Effect of Low  Oxides of
      Sulfur Concentrations  on  the Animal Organism,  pp. 92-102, V.A. Rya-
      zanov (ed.), In: Limits of Allowable Concentrations  of Atmospheric
      Pollutants,  Book 5,  U.S.  Department of Commerce,  Office of  Technical
      Service, Washington, D.C.

156.  Cavender, F.L.,  J.L. Williams,  W.H. Steinhagen,  and D. Woods.  Ther-
      modynamics and Toxicity of Sulfuric Acid Mists.  J.  Toxicol.  Environ.
      Health. 2:1147-1159, 1977.

157.  Kawecki, J.M.  Emission of Sulfur-bearing Compounds  from Motor Vehi-
      cles and aircraft engines:  A Report to Congress.  EPA-600/9-78-028,
      U.S. Environmental  Protection  Agency,  Environmental  Sciences  Research
      Laboratory,  Research Triangle  Park, NC,  1978.

158.  Lewis,  T.R., M.O. Amdur,  M.D.  Fritzhand,  and  K.J. Campbell.   Toxi-
      cology  of Atmospheric  Sulfur Dioxide Decay Products,  AP-111  (PB-212
      744),  U.S. Environmental  Protection Agency.  National  Environmental
      Research Center, Research Triangle Park,  NC,  1972.

159.  Malcolm, D., and E.  Paul.  Erosion of the Teeth  Due to Sulphuric Acid
      in the  Battery Industry.  Brit.  J.  Ind.  Med.  18:63-69,  1961.

160.  Morando, A.   Experimental and  Clinical  Contributions  to the Pathology
      of Sulfuric  Fumes in Man. Med.  Lav. 47-557-561,  1956.
                                    92

-------
161.  Murray,  F.J., B.A. Schwetz, K.D. Nitsche, A.A. Crawford, J,F. Quast,
      and R.E. Staples.  Embryotoxicity of Inhaled Sulfuric Acid Aerosol in
      Mice and Rabbits. J. Environ. Sci. Health. C13(3):251-256, 1979.

162.  National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health.  Criteria for
      a Recommended Standard, Occupational Exposure to Sulfuric Acid. U.S.
      Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., 1974.

163.  Raule, A. Occupational Disease Caused by Sulfuric Acid. Med. Lav. 590-
      599, 195/1.
                                                           i

164.  Sackner, M.A., M. Reinhardt, and D. Ford.   Effect of Sulfuric Acid
      Mist on Pulmonary Function in Animals and Man.   Amer. Rev. Respir.
      Dis. 115 (4 part 2):240.

165.  Shriner, D.S.  Effects of Simulated Rain Acidified with Sulfuric Acid
      on Host-parasite Interactions.  Water Air Soil  Pollut. 8:9-14, 1977.
                                                         --  i
166.  Sim, V.M.,  and R.E.  Pattle.  Effect of Possible Smog Irritants on
      Human Subjects.   J.  Amer. Med. Assoc. 165:1908-1913, 1957.

167.  Ten Bruggen Cate, H.J.   Dental Erosion 1n Industry.  Brit, J. Ind.
      Med. 25:249,  1968.

168.  Thomas, M.D., R.H.  Hendricks, F.D.  Gunn, and T, Critchlow.  Prolonged
      Exposure of Guinea Pigs to Sulfuric Acid Aerosol.  AMA Arch, Ind.
      Health, 17:70-80, 1958.

169.  Toyama, T., and K.  Nakamura.  Synergistic Response of Hydrogen Per- ,
      oxide Aerosols and Sulfur Dioxide to Pulmonary Airway Resistance. Inc.
      Health, 2:34-45, 1964:-


170.  Wedding, J.B., and M.  Ligotke.  Effects of Sulfuric Acid Mist on Plant
      Canopies.  Environ.  Sci.  Technol.  13(7):875-878,  1979.

171.  Fairfax, J.A.W., and N.W. Lepp.   Effects of Simulated "Acid Rain" on
      Cation  Loss from Leaves.   Nature 255:324-325, 1975.

172.  Tamm,  C.O., G. Wiklander, and B. Popovic.   Effects of Application of
      Sulfuric Acid to Poor Pine Forests.  Water Air  Soil Poll.   8:75-87,
      1977.

173.  Basuk,  J.,  and A. Nichols.  An Overview of the  Vinyl  Chloride Hazard in
      Canada.  Chemistry in  Canada.   Summer,  1977,  Science Council  for Canada,
      pp.  23-38,  1977.

174.  Byren,  D.,  G. Engholm,  A. Englund,  and  P.  Westerholm.  Mortality and
      Morbidity in  a Group of Swedish VCM and PCV Production Workers.
      Environ. Health Perspect. 17:167-170, 1976.

                                     S3

-------
175.  Creech, J.L., and M.N. Johnson.  Angiosarcoma of Liver in the Manu-
      facture of Polyvinyl Chloride.  J. Occup. Med. 16)30:150-151, 1974.

176.  Edmonds, L.D., C.E. Anderson, J.W. Flynt, and L.M. James.  Congenital
      Central Nervous System Malformations and Vinyl Chloride Monomer
      Exposure:  A Community Study.  Teratology 17:137-142, 1978.

177.  Funes-Cravioto, F., B. Lambert, J. Lindsten, L. Ehrenberg,
      A.T. Natarajan, and S. Osterman-Golkar.  Chromosomic Aberrations in
      Workers Exposed to Vinyl Chloride.  Lancet 1:459, 1975.

178.  Infante, P.  Oncogenic and Mutagenic Risks in Communities with Poly-
      vinyl Chloride Production Facilities.  Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 271:49-57,
      1976.

179.  Lilis, R., H. Anderson, W.J. Nicholson, S. Daum, A.S. Fischbein, and
      J.J. Selikoff.  Prevalence of Disease Among Vinyl Chloride and Poly-
      vinyl Chloride Workers.  Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 246:42-52, 1975.

180.  Miller, A., A.S. Teirstein, M. Chuang, I.J. Selikoff, and R. Warshaw.
      Changes in Pulmonary Function in Workers Exposed to Vinyl Chloride
      and Polyvinyl Chloride.  Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 246:42-52, 11975.

181.  National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health.  Recommended
      Standard for Occupational Exposure to Vinyl Chloride.  NIOSH.
      Cincinnati, Ohio, 1979.

182.  Potter, H.R.  Vinyl Chloride - Part II.  Food Cosmet. Toxicol.
      14:498-501, 1976.

183.  Suciu, I., L. Prodan, E. Ilea, and A. Padaruaru.  Clinical Manifesta-
      tions in Vinyl Chloride Poisoning.  Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 246:53-69,
      1975.

184.  Tabershaw, I.R., and W.R. Gaffey.  Mortality Study of Workers in
      the Manufacture of Vinyl Chloride and its Polymers.  J. Occup. Med.
      16(8):509-518, 1974.

185.  Sadilova,  U.S.  Atmospheric Air Pollution with Fluorine as the Cause
      of Fluorsis in Children of Inhabited Localities.  In P.yazanov, V.A. ed.
      Limits of Allowable Concentrations of Atmospheric Pollutants, Book 3,
      p. 88-95,  1957.

186.  Veltman,  G.,  C.E.  Lange,  S.  Juhe,  G.  Stein,  U.  Bachner.   Clinical
      Manifestations and Course of Vinyl Chloride  Disease.   Ann.  N.Y.  Acad.
      Sci.  Vol.  246:6-17,  1975,

187.  Winell,  M.,  B. Holmberg,  and T.  Kroneri.   Biological  Effects of Vinyl
      Chloride:   An Experimental  Study.   Environ.  Health Perspect.
      17:211-216,  1976.

188.  Ahlborg,  G.  Hydrogen Sulfide Poisoning in Shale Oil Industry.  Arch.
      Ind.  Hyg.  Occup.  Med.  3:247-66, 1951.

                                    94

-------
189.  Duan, F.Z. [Data for Determining the Maximum Permissible Concentra-
      tion of Hydrogen Sulfide in the Atmospheric Air.]  Gig. Sanit.
      10:12-17, 1959.

190.  Illinois Institute for Environmental Quality.  The Air Pollution
      Situation in Terre-Haute, Indiana with Special Reference to the
      Hydrogen Sulfide Incident of May-June 1964.  National Technical
      Information Service PB 227486, 1964.

191.  Leonardos, G., D. Kendall, and N. Barnard.  Odor Threshold Deter-
      mination of 53 Odorant Chemicals.  J. Air Poll. Contr. Assoc.
      19(2):91-95, 1969.

192.  Miner, S.  Preliminary Air Pollution Survey of Hydrogen Sulfide.  A
      Literature Review - National Air Pollution Control Administration,
      Publ. No. APTD 69-37.  National Technical Information Service, PB 188
      068, 1969.

193.  National Research Council.  Hydrogen Sulfide.  University Park Press
      Baltimore, Md., 1979.

194.  National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health.  Criteria for
      a Recommended Standard.  Occupational Exposure to Hydrogen Sulfide.
      U.S. Government Printing Office.  Washington D.C., (NIOSH) 1977.

195.  Sandage, C.   Tolerance Criteria for Continuous Inhalation Exposure to
      Toxic Material - I.  Effects on Animals of 90-day Exposure to Phenol,
      CCK, and a  Mixture of Indol, Skatol, HoS, and Methyl  Mercaptan.
      Arlington, Virginia Armed Services Technical  Information Agency, 1961
      (ASTIA AD 268 783).
195.  Walton, D.C. and M.G. Witherspoon.  Skin Absorption of Certain
      Gases.  J. Pharmacol. Exp. Therm. 26:315-324, 1925.

196.  Fairchild, E.J., and H.E. Stokinger.  Toxicologic Studies on Organic
      Sulfur Compounds.  Acute Toxicity of Some Aliphatic and Aromatic
      Thiols (Mercaptans).  J. Amer. Ind. Hyg. Assoc. 19:171-189, 1958.

197.  Key, M.M., A.F. Henschel, J. Butler, R.N. Ligo, and I.R. Tabershaw.
      Occupational Diseases.  A Guide to their Recognition.  National
      Institute for Occupational Safety and Health.  U.S. Government
      Printing Office.  Washington, D.C. pp. 310-312, 1977-

198.  Shults, W.T., E.N., Fountain, and E.E. Lynch.  Methanethiol
      Poisoning:  Irreversible Coma and Hemolytic Anemia Following Inhala-
      tion. J. Amer. Med. Assoc.  211(130):2153-2154,  1970.

199.  Verschueren, K.  Handbook of Environmental Data On Organic Chemicals.
      Von Nostrand Reinhold Co. Ltd., N.Y., 1977.

200.  Zieve, L., W.M. Doryaki, and F.J. Zieve.  Synergism Between Mercap-
      tans and Ammonia or Fatty Acids 1n the Production of Coma:  A Possi-
      ble Role for Mercaptans in the Pathogenisis of Hepatic Coma.  J. Lab.
      Clin. Med. 23:16-28, 1974.

201.  Peyton, T.O., R.v. Steele, and W.R. Mabey.  Carbon Disulfide,
      Carbonyl Sulfide:  Literature Review and Environmental Assessment.
      National Technical Information Service, PB-257947, Springfield, Va.,
      1976.

-------
202.  Wostradowski, R.A., S.P. Bhatia, and S. Prahacs.  Significance of
      Carbonyl Sulfide) COS Emissions for Kraft Recovery Furnaces.  Trans.
      Tech., Sect. Can. Pulp. Pap. Assoc. 2(2):51-57.  [Toxline Search p.
      2174100], 1976.

203.  Agadzhanova, A.A.  Occupational Hygiene of Women Engaged in the
      Manufacture of Rayon Fiber.   Gig.  Tr.  Prof.  Zabol,  Issue 4, page
      10-13 (Engl. Abstr.), 1978.

204.  Barylyak, I.R., I.A. Vasilyeva, and L.T.  Kalenovskaya.   Effect of
      Small Concentrations of Carbon Disulfide and Hydrogensulfide on
      Inhaulerine Development in Rats.  Arkh. Anat. Gistol.  Embriol.
      68:77-81,,  1975.

205.  Bokina, A.I., R.V. Merkur'yeva, N.D. Eksler, A.A. Oleinik,  and
      Pinigina II.  Experimental Study of the Mechanism and Indices of
      Harmful Effects of Certain Chemical Substances on the Central Nervous
      System.  Environ. Health.  Perspect. 30:31-38, 1979.

206.  Bokina, A.I., N.D. Eksler, A.D. Semenenko, R.V. Merkur'eva.
      Investigation of the Mechanism of  Action of Atmospheric Pollutants on
      the Central Nervous System and Comparative Evaluation of Methods of
      Study.  Environ. Health Perspect.  13:37-42,  1976.

207.  Levine, T.E.  Effects of Carbon Disulfide and FLA.-63.  on Operant
      Behavior in Pigeons, J. Pharm Exp.  Ther.  199:669-678, 1976.

208.  Lindvall, T.  Perception of Composite Odorous Air Pollutants,
      Proc. Int. Symp Olfaction  Taste, 6th,  449-458, 1977.

209.  Misiakiewicy Z., G. Syulenska, and A.  Chyba.  Effect  of the Mixture
      of Carbon Disulfide and Hydrogen Sulfide in Air on White Rats Under
      Conditions of Continuous Exposure for Several Months.  Rocy
      Panstiv.  Zakl. Hig. 23:465-75, 1972.

210.  Gabovich, R.D.S. and V.A.  Murashko.  Carbon Disulfide Action on the
      Digestive Organs in Workers of the Viscose Industry and in  Experimen-
      tal Animals.  Gig. Tr. Prof. Zabol.  Issue 10:50-52 (Engl.  Abstr.),
      1978.

211.  National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health.   Criteria
      for a Recommended Standard.   Occupational Exposure to Carbon Disul-
      fide.  U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington,  D.C., 1977.

212.  Balazova, G.  The Long Term Effect of Fluoride Emissions on the
      Organism of the Child. lied.  Lavoro 62:202-7, 1971.

213.  Szymankowa, G.  [Observations on the Effects of Carbon Disulfide on
      Vision in Workers Engaged in the Manufacture of Synthetic Fibers.]
      Klin. Oczna 38:41-44, 1968.
                                    96

-------
214.  Wakatsuki, T.  [Experimental Study on the Poisoning by Carbon Disul-
      fide and Hydrogen Sulfide.]  Shikoku Igaku Zasshi 15:671-700, 1959.

215.  Wakatsuki, T. and H. Higashikawa.  [Experimental  Studies on CSg,   ,
      and H2$ Poisoning - The Histological Changes in Hematoporetic Organs
      and Other Main Internal Organs.]  Shikoku Igaku Zasshi 14:549-54,
      1959.

216.  Weiss, B. and I.E. Levine.  Studies in the Behavioral  Toxicology  of
      Environmental Contaminants.  Environ. Health Pers.  13:31-35, 1976.

217.  Weiss, B., R.W. Wood and D.A. Macys.  Behavioral  Toxicology of Carbon
      Disulfide and Toluene.  Environ. Health Pers. 30:39-45, 1979.

218.  National Research Council.  Odors from Stationary and  Mobile Sources.
      National Academy of Sciences, Washington D.C. p.  329,  1979.

219.  Berglund, B.  Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis of Industrial
      Odors with Human Observers.  Ann. N.Y. Acad. of Sci. 237:35-51, 1974.

220.  Standard Support and Environmental Impact Statement:  Emission Stan-
      dard for Vinyl Chloride.  Prepared for Environmental  Protection
      Agency.  EPA-450/2-75-009.  October 1975.

221.  Treon, J. F., F. R. Dutra, J. Cappel, H. Sigmon,  W. Younker.  Toxicity
      of Sulfuric Acid Mist.  Archives of Industrial  Hygiene and Occupational
      Medicine, Vol. 2, Pps. 716-734, 1950.

222.  U. S. Environmental Protection Agency.  Requirements for Preparation
      Adoption, and Submittal of State Implementation Plans; Approval and
      Promulgation of State Implementation Plans.   Federal  Register,
      September 5, 1979.   U. S.  Environmental Protection Agency.

223.  Balazova, G. Long Term Effect of Fluoride Emission  Upon Children.
      Fluoride 2:85-88, 1971

224.  Balazova, G., A. Rippel, and E. Hluchan.  Effect of Atmospheric
      Fluorine Pollution on the Living Organism.  Nutr. Proc. Int. Congr.
      8th, 1970.

225.  Hluchan, E., J. Mayer, and E. Abel.  Atmospheric Pollution by
      Fluorides in the Neighborhood of an Aluminum Factory.   Med Lavoro
      59:370-5, 1968.

226.  Balazova, G., and V. Lipkova.  Evaluation of Some Health Parameters
      in Children in the Vicinity of an Aluminum Factory.  Fluoride 7:88-93,
      1974.

227.  Lezovic, J., and G. Balazova.  Fluorine Content in the Teeth and
      Urine of Children in the Neighborhood of an Aluminum Plant.  Cesk
      Stomatol 69-260-3. 1969.

228.  Masure,  R.  La  Ke'rato-conjonctivite des  Filatures de Viscose; Etude
      Clinique et Experimentale.   Rev. Beige de Path. 20:297-341, 1950.

                                    97

-------
229.   Nesswetha, W.   Eye Lesions  Caused by Sulphur Compounds.   Arbeitsmed.
      Soziaimed. Arbeitshyg.  4:288-290, 1969.

230.   Hays, F. L.  Studies of the Effects of Atmospheric Hydrogen Sulfide
      in Animals.  Thesis, Columbia University of Missouri  Graduate School.
      pp. 218. 1972.

231.   Ljunggren, G., and B. Norberg.   On the Effect and Toxicity of Dimethyl
      Sulfide, Dimethyl Disulfide, and Methyl  Mercaptan.  Acta Physio!.
      Scand.  5:248-255, 1943.

232.   Bremner, J. M.  Role of Organic Matter in Volatilization of Sulfur
      and Nitrogen from Soils.   Soil  Org. Matter Stud.  Proc.  Symp.
      Vol. 2:229-240, 1977.

233.   Alexander, M.   Microbial  Formation of Environmental  Pollutants.   In:
      Perlman, D. ed. Advances  in Applied Microbiology.  Vol.  18. 1-73.
      Academic Press, 1974.

234.   Kadota, H., and Y. Ishida.   Production of Volatile Sulfur Compounds
      1591 by Microorganisms.  Annu.  Rev. Microbiol. 26:127-138, 1972.

235.   Zlatkis, A., W. Bertsch,  H. A.  Lichtenstein, A.  Tishbee, F.Shunbo,
      H. M. Liebich, A. M. Coscia, and N. Fleischer.  Profile of Volatile
      Metabolites in Urine by Gas Chromatography-Mass  Spectrometry. Anal.
      Chem. 45(4):763-7, 1973.

236.   Conkle, 0. P., B. J. Camp,  and  B. E. Welch.  Trace Composition of
      Human Respiratory Gas.  Arch. Environ. Health 30:290-295, 1975.

237.   Dowty, B. J.,  J. L. Laseter, and J. Storer.  The Transplacental
      Mitigation and Accumulation in  Blood of Volatile Organic Constituents.
      Pediatr. Res.  10(7):696-701, 1976.

238.   Gage, J. C.  The Subacute Inhalation Toxicity of 109  Industrial
      Chemicals.  Brit. J. Ind. Med.  27:1-18,  1970.

239.   Vasilescu, C.   Motor Nerve Conduction Velocity and Electromyogram
      in Carbon Disulphide Poisoning.  Rev. Roum. Neurol.  9:63-71, 1972.

240.   Kramarenko, I. B., I. N.  Yakovleva, F. I. Grishko, and  Y. A.
      Litvinova.  Hygienic Evaluation of Vocational Training  of Young
      Workers in Spinning Shops of a  Viscose Mill.  Hyg. Sanit. 36:379-384.
      1971.

241.   Kashin, L. M.   Overall  Immunological Reactivity and Morbidity of
      Workers Exposed to Carbon Disulfide.  Hyg. Sanit. 30:331-335, 1965.

242.   Petrov, M. V.   Some Data on the Course and Termination  of Pregnancy
      in Female Workers of the Viscose Industry.  Pediatr.  Akush, Ginekol.
      3:50-52, 1969.
                                    98

-------
243.  Gavrilescu, N., and R. Lilis.  Cardiovascular Effects of Long-
      extended Carbon Disulfide Exposure.  In: Brieger, H., and
      J. Teisinger, eds. Toxicology of Carbon Disulfide.  Amsterdam,
      Excerpta Medica Foundation, p. 165-167, 1967.

244.  Lewis, R. J. ed. Registry of Toxic Effects of Chemical Substances.
      National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health.
      Cincinnati, Ohio.  1979.

245.  American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists.  Thres-
      hold Limit Values for Chemical Substances and Physical Agents in the
      Work Room Environment with Intended Changes for 1979,  ACGIH,
      Cincinnati, Ohio. pp. 94, 1978.

246.  Cleland, J. G., and G. L. Kingsbury.   Multimedia Environmental Goals
      for Environmental' Assessment, Vol. II MEG Charts and Background
      Information.  U.S. EPA, Industrial Environmental Research Laboratory,
      Research Triangle Park, N.C.   Publication No. EPA-600/7-77-136b.
      p. 450,  1977:
                                   99

-------
                                    TECHNICAL REPORT DATA
                             (Please read Instructions on the reverse before completing)
 1. REPORT NO.
  EPA-450/2-80-074
                                                            5. REPORT DATE  rial copy
                                                             June  '80 -forwarded to  EPA
                                                             3. RECIPIENT'S ACCESSION NO.
4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE
 Health Impacts,  Emissions, and Emission Factors for
 Noncriteria  Pollutants Subject to  De  Minimi's Guidelines
 and Emitted  from Stationary Conventional  Combustion
                                                            6. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE
                                                        Processes
7.AUTHOR(s)
              g^ Ackermanj  M-  T.  Haro> G. Richard,  A.  M.
 Takata and P- J. Weller  plus D. 0. Bean, B. W.  Cornaby,
                                                            8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NO.
        M-iHan  anrl
                       E  Ron*	
. PERFORM'fN'G'OR'dANl'ZATIO'N NAME\~ffND ADDRESS
TRW
Redondo Beach,  California
Batlelle
Columbus, Ohio
                                                             10. PROGRAM ELEMENT NO.
                                                            T1. CONTRACT/GRANT NO.
                                                              68-02-3138
12. SPONSORING AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS
 U.  S.  EPA
 Industrial Environmental  Research Laboratory
 Research Triangle Park,  N.C.  27711
                                                             13. TYPE OF REPORT AND PERIOD COVERED
                                                            14. SPONSORING AGENCY CODE
15. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES
 6. ABSTRACT
       Report presents  a  literature survey of  the health and ecological  effects
  associated with various air quality levels of noncriteria pollutants that are
  regulated under the  Clean Air Act.  These noncriteria pollutants  include mercury,
  beryllium, asbestos,  sulfuric acid mist, vinyl  chloride, hydrogen sulfide, methyl
  mercaptan, dimethyl  sulfide, dimethyl disulfide, carbon disulfide and carbony
  sulfide.  Nationwide  emissions are estimated for each noncriteria pollutant with
  particular emphasis  on  contributions from fossil fuel combustion  at stationary
  sources.  Factors  for quantifying emissions  from fossil fuel  combustion processes
  are discussed for  each  noncriteria pollutant.
                                KEY WORDS AND DOCUMENT ANALYSIS
                  DESCRIPTORS
                                               b.IDENTIFIERS/OPEN ENDED TERMS
                                                                          c. COSATI Field/Group
 Noncriteria pollutant
 8. DISTRIBUTION STATEMEN1
                                               19. SECURITY CLASS (This Report}

                                                 Unclassified
                                                                          21. NO. OF PAGES

                                                                          	100
                                               20. SECURITY CLASS (This page)
                                                                          22. PRICE
                                                 Unclassified
EPA Form 2220-1 (Rev. J-77)   PREVIOUS EDITION is OBSOLETE

-------