-------
MISSOURI
PART A. ALLOWABLE MASS EMISSION RATE FOR INDIRECT HEAT EXCHANGERS
Political
Jurisdiction
State
Independence
Kansas City
Springfield-
Greene Co.
St. Louis
Total heat Input
based on:
•o
c
O 3
— a
S.3
c*-
Z^
**
M
•o
I
1
J,
«
«
jl
X 0
X
X
X
X
X
•1
1
;
X
X
X
X
M
1
1
j=
M
s
_
|
=
0
Allowable
emissions
based on:
—
g
a.
*>
c
UJ
—
c
3
TX
I
s
Wl
|
c
X
X
X
X
X
o
Units of the
regulations
3
03
S
£
X1
1
X3
X3
X2
X3,4
|
U
£
t\
o
§
is.
^_
u
M
M
C
k
O
k
v
5
0
i
Ol
•C
U
C
u
*-
ae
1-16
1-17
1-16
m§
i
*j
i
i
PTC
27
PTC
27
PTC
27
PTC
27
PTC
27
Footnotes
1. Existing -
Log y • -0.23299 Log X * 1.4091
10 < x < 10,000
< 10 x 10° Btu/h • 0.60 lb/106 Btu
i 10.000 x 106 - 0.18 lb/106 Btu
New (constructed after 4-3-71) -
< 10 x 106 - 0.60 lb/106 Btu
> 2.000 x 106 - 0.10 lb/10» Btu
Tog y • -0.3882 log X » 2.1454
10 < x < 2,000 x 106
2. 10 < x < 10.000 x 106
Log y • 0,2330 Log X -2,0111
< 10 x 10° • 0.60 lb/106 Btu
>. 10.000 x 106 • 0.12 lb/10* Btu
3. Existing
E * 1.09Q-0-25'
< 10 x 10" • 0.6 lb/106 Btu
> 5.000 x 106 • 0.12 lb/106 Btu
New (constructed after 2-1S-79)
E - O.B Q-°-301
< 10 x 106 - 0.4 lb/106 Btu
> 1,000 x 106 • 0.1 lb/106 Btu
4. Also regulations based on stack height.
vo
(continued)
-------
MISSOURI (continued)
PART 8. VISIBLE EMISSION REGULATIONS
Politic*)
Jurisdiction
State
Independence
Kansas City
Springfield-
Greene County
St. Louis
Existing sources
Requirement
c
c
in
E
41
c
oc
2
I
1
2
2
x
«->
Q.
O
C
•9
C
e —
HJ
«J •»
*>
t. C b
o ••- 3
I 8 0
0 |
Z 1 i-l
Exception
c
c
*
e
Ol
c
QC
3
3
3
3
2
x
4-1
s
o.
o
|Q
C
c —
n
*-» ta
« 3
U C t-
8-*- 3
CO
O 1
z 1 •-«
6
6
6
6
6
o
New sources!
Requi rement
c
c
t)
e
c
1
1
1
1
I
^
*j
a.
o
X
c
c
C -r-
19
£ Wl
*-• «
L C U
ceo
^ i:
Exception
c
|
CT
C
ae
3
3
3
3
2
4-»
U
c
c -*-
2-
4-* *
• J
k C b
"V
F
6
6
6
6
*
o
•o
o
^
i
c
I
t_
•o
*
I
4-1
c
1 «l
Q C
«» O"
^ ai
o u
C O)
4-1 -^
c u
o o
U 4-1
X
Footnotes
1. Constructed after 4-3-71 except St. Louis where
new Is constructed after 2-15-79.
-------
MONTANA
PART A. ALLOWABLE MASS EMISSION RATE FOR INDIRECT HEAT EXCHANGERS
Political
jurisdiction
State
Total heat Input
based on:
O 3
JO
Aggregrate
all fuels
X
-?
Wl
1
5
-*
O T)
Ql
II
•— £1
5 o
VI
C
3
?
VI
S
•o
—
c
*J
1
—
c
X
•
0
Allowable
emissions
based on:
—
c
•o
a.
ai
—
c
UJ
c
1
-»-
c
u
rtl
—
c
X
5
Units of the
regulations
3
*J
CD
IB
O
r-l
X
JC
^c
u
*»
o
o
SM
u
in
VI
C
L.
U
0
V
u
o»
Reference
!oi
^
•
c
L.
3
VI
•a
Footnotes
1. Existing.
2. Hew (constructed after 11-73-68).
PART B. VISIBLE EMISSION REGULATIONS
Political
jurisdiction
State
Existing sources
Requirement
Ringelmann
2
U
ns
a.
o
c
c
C f
•a
C. M
*-» V
li|
o 1
Z It-*
Exception
c
c
Ol
c
ae
3
2-
U
a.
o
c
"l!
4
5
0
New sources *
Requirpmpnt
c
a*
c
DC
U
•V
a.
o
20
c
•fl
c
C Wl
»J «l
Ol 3
CEO
Exception
c
c
at
c
ae
X
a
o
60
1
C
is§
5 1:
4
S
o
\
VI
I
Continuous imni- i
toring requirement i
Footnotes
1. Constructed after 11-23-68.
-------
NEBRASKA
PART A. ALLOWABLE MASS EMISSION RATE FOR INDIRECT HEAT EXCHANGERS
Political
jurisdiction
State
Omaha
Lincoln
Total heat Input
based on:
a*
c
«- u
O 3
a
41
•a —
4" *-
U
-St1^
X
c
"O
1
c
—
O
NS
NS
Allowable
eml scions
based on:
c
it
GL
V
—
UJ
X
^j
c
3
-^
-
5
(J
Tl
.^
•o
C
X
*
o
NS
Units of the
regulations
3
CO
O
£1
X1
X
X
t-
a
u
3
O
O
o
r-*
£* 19
i~ a»
u
Ml
C
o
L.
0
*
CT>
U
C
•1
u
t)
ac
1-15
I-H
1-ZC
a
5
e
c
V
u
w»
£
PTC
Z7
Footnotes
1. <10 x 106 Btu/h 0.60 lb/106 Btu
>3BOO x 106 Btu/h 0.15 lb/106 Btu
Y . '-°^6
V » allowable emissions
X • total heat Input
ro
PART B. VISIBLE EMISSION REGULATIONS
Political
Jurisdiction
State
Omaha
Lincoln4
Existing sources
Requirement
c
c
g
W
Oi
c
•*-
C L.
O O
(J 4^
X2
Footnotes
1. Constructed after 8-17-71.
Z. Fossil Fuel-Fired Steam Generators only.
3. No more than 3 occasions 1n any 24-h period.
4. No limit on opacity for units < 0.10 lb/1000 Ibs
flue gas.
-------
NEVADA
PART A. ALLOWABLE MASS EMISSION RATE FOR INDIRECT HEAT EXCHANGERS
Political
jurisdiction
State (except
Reno, Sparks,
Washoe Co.)
Reno, Sparks,
Washoe
Counties
Total heat input
based on:
?
C
•»- t-
o 3
X3
10 •—
t-
< *
.?
til
s
Max i nun
c
Ol
in
O TJ
1 1
S,.
3E 0
X
M
'i
X
Ul
1
§
Individ
U
3
IA
IV
D
Individ
1
0
Allowable
emissions
based on:
c
IO
"a.
ff
1
UJ
X
c
3
Individ
U
IV
4.000 x 10° Btu/h
E ' 17.0 Q-°-568
Z. 0.15 gr/scf
U)
PART B. VISIBLE EMISSION REGULATIONS
Political
jurisdiction
State except
Clark, Reno,
Sparks,
Washoe Co.
Clark, Reno,
Sparks,
Washoe Co.
Existing sources
Requirement
c
c
?
1
1
>,
U
o.
o
20
|
C
•*-» Ol
Cit
Se3
1 i:
3
3
Exception
c
c
2
S,
oe
>.
i
i
c
4J «
5 1*
£
o
New sources
Requirement
c
c
3
1
oe
>,
I
|
C
K
ff i i.
o 1
Z IrH
Exception
c
c
3
1
QC.
Z
'5
a.
o
1
c
•1 3
iij
o
TJ
01
E
*J
C
01
§
(A
i
i!
Ha
1-
C O)
••* c
C U
0 0
o w
X
Footnotes
-------
NEW HAMPSHIRE
PART A. ALLOWABLE MASS EMISSION RATE FOR INDIRECT HEAT EXCHANGERS
1
Political
jurisdiction
State
Total heat input
based on:
•o
w
c
H- t-
O 3
4-> (A
U (V
O) 3
Ol <*-
u
X
c
O)
(A
01
-o
E
X
I
c
01
(V
•o
H-
O T3
E?
3 L.
E 3
X
z o
V)
4-*
C
3
tA
C
3
3
•o
'5
O
Ifl
(A
^
T3
X
5
Allowable
emissions
based on:
c
O-
a*
5
c
^
•5
(J
flj
(A
(0
•5
X
x:
Units of the
regulations
3
m
u>
o
xi.z
^
Ol
u
c
_ 10.000 x 106 Btu/h
E = 0.19 lb/106 Btu
2. New (constructed after 2-18-72)
Q <_ 10 x 106 Btu/h
E = 0.60 lb/106 Btu
10 < Q < 250 x 106 Btu/h
E = 1.0286Q-0'23"
Q > 250 x 106 Btu/h
E = 0.10 lb/106 Btu
(continued)
-------
NEW HAMPSHIRE (continued)
PART B. VISIBLE EMISSION REGULATIONS
Political
jurisdiction
State -
sources ,
< 250 x 10°
Btu/h
sources ,
> 250 x 10°
Btu/h
Existing sources
Requirement
c
i
01
O)
c
DC
2
x
Q.
O
40
20
x
*
c
c ••-
5 «
W 3 .
O -r- 3
E E O
O 1
3E I r-l
Exception
c
c
1
QC
x
U
O
40
40
^
19
C
C VI
Ol 3
ii|
62
2
u
•i
£
4J
O
New sources'
Requirement
c
c
f
1
I
20
20
^
•0
c
:«
iii
5 1:
Exception
i
O)
oc
o
40
x
A
C
VI
*J 01
!!,l
Z li-l
62
2
t.
o
•o
5
I
c
IA
1
ii
I?
•f- C
c t-
0 0
CJ •»>
Footnotes
1. Constructed after 2-18-72.
2. Installations equipped with automatic soot
blowers will be permitted to exceed No. 2
for a period not to exceed 60 min In any
8-h period.
U1
-------
NEW JERSEY
PART A. ALLOWABLE MASS EMISSION RATE FOR INDIRECT HEAT EXCHANGERS
Political
jurisdiction
State
Total heat input
based on:
•o
«
c
O 3
a
*o —
t- W
CTI a
u
en —
u>. —
X
c
Ol
9
X
C
d
M
TJ
0 "O
IE
--- ^3
X
*J
C
w»
*>
C
D
«
3
T3
-5
.X
U
i«
*-»
in
D
TJ
5
C
X
5
4-*
O
Allowable
emissions
based on:
4J
C
ex
*>
4J
c
UJ
.*-»
c
3
•fl
3
O
-5
c
.X
U
•n
*j
(A
«
3
TJ
T3
C
X
c
*>
o
Units of the
regulations
CD
«
\
£3
^*,
A
X1
^
3
O
0
\ «
JO a
a.
0
c
c
l«
JC VI
*-* *
*J
?S3
5 1:
JC
o
tJ
w
JV
•
(A
IV
1 *
s?
•1 0-
0 t
>- c:
*• ^~
C 1.
o a
Footnotes
1. Sources > 200 x 106 Btu/h and stacks with cross
sectional dimension > 60 In.
2. Sources < 200 x 106 Btu/h. No visible
emissions.
3. 3 min In any one-half hour period.
-------
NEW MEXICO
PART A. ALLOWABLE MASS EMISSION RATE FOR INDIRECT HEAT EXCHANGERS
Political
jurisdiction
State
Total heat Input
based on:
J
o a
a
il
u
< "a
X
s
IA
•o
i
^-
1
&
M
«
ll
•*- A
Ife
V)
i
;
M
§
3
1
*-*
X
s
tfl
•o
•o
c
*-*
V
£
o
Allowable
emissions
based on:
c
Ol
c
UJ
c
1
•a
c
X
u
3
V)
'i
TJ
I
•1
5
o
Units of the
regulations
3
OQ
10
^
^
X1
^
£
I
S
S
^a
u
•^
IV
u
o
Jj
o
£
O)
8
•1
41
H-
,.
1-
233
method |
I
2
1
PTC-
27
Footnotes
1. Coal burning -
0.05 lb/106 Btu
Oil burning -
> 1012 Btu/yr/un1t
E < 0.005 lb/106 Btu
2. Existing.
3. New (12-31-71)
PART B. VISIBLE EMISSION REGULATIONS
Political
jurisdiction
State (except
Albuquerque-
Bernallllo
Co)
AI buquerque-
Bernallllo
Co.
Existing sources
Requirement
|
.1
OL
1
1
5-
U
§
20
&
C
c •*-
££
+J
2iu
's>°
S U
l
X1
Exception
c
c
1
DC
if
V
S
&
c
2o
"S
Siu
S5.l
£ L
5
o
New sources
Requirement
c
c
1
ec
5-
»
O.
O
&
c
c-«-
•3
£ in
^3
tlu
i5.I
s L
Exception
c
c
01
cr
i-
i
&
c
e-^
5«
"3
2?u
il|
o |£
Z llH
*J
o
1
+J
?
jrenent
tn
1
4J
il
I-?
«&
3 *>
§(.
O»
«t
O O
(_> *J
Footnotes
1. No more than 1 mln 1n any 30 min.
-------
NEW YORK
PART A. ALLOWABLE MASS EMISSION RATE FOR INDIRECT HEAT EXCHANGERS
Political
Jurisdiction
State
Total heat input
based on:
-o
c
<•- L.
O 3
XS
•a •—
(- *
CT J
t.
f ^
X
c
01
X
•o
X
c
O!
Ol
T3
*-
01
3 *-
X
*>
"c
;=
w
c
' —
3
TJ
?
^
• —
5
TJ
T3
C
X
«
j=
*j
Allowable
eml ss ions
based on:
c
•fl
Q.
*|
H^
C
c
3
•—
3
T3
•^
C
M
U
in
1 —
5
•o
.*
c
v
4-*
Units of the
regulations
3
CD
«
2
a
X
_c
^
.M
U
wt
XI
"~"
o
o
^4
^ s
*•
y
VI
-^
»_
v
O
u
Ol
w
V
jj
*
CK
1-35
l-3(
0
01
E
C
«
£
u
5
i
Footnotes
1. Solid fuel -burning units
spreader stoclter, 0 < 300
0.60 lb/106 Btu
other units. Q < 300
Q, 106 Btu/h E. lb/106 Btu
1-100 0.6
200 0.45
300 0.30
Units > 300 Btu/h
Q <_ 10 0.6 lb/106 Btu
10 < o < 10.000 E • 1.02 q'°-m
011 fired or coal > 250 x 106 Btu/h
E - 0.10 lb/106 Btu
oo
(continued)
-------
NEW YORK (continued)
PART B. VISIBLE EMISSION REGULATIONS
Political
jurisdiction
State
Existing sources
Requirement
RingelMnn
1
S
20
*
e =
No more tha
minutes
1 hour
3
Exception
RingelMnn
2
O
1
40
«
c
c ••-
£ VI
s*
ill
0
i.
1
New sources
Requirement
Ringelmann
£
I
«
C
O ••- 3
• CO
O 1
Z |rH
Exception
Ringelnann
o.
o
250 x 106 Btu/h fuel combustion sources
(except gas-fired) and Portland cement kilns and
Chinker coolers only.
vo
-------
NORTH CAROLINA
PART A. ALLOWABLE MASS EMISSION RATE FOR INDIRECT HEAT EXCHANGERS
Political
jurisdiction
State
Total heat input
based on:
^
c
»- u
0 3
.O
IB • —
i- W
01 3
W V-
u
«t 'w
X
c
01
1
19
X
C
01
t/>
9
"*-
O XI
i!
2 u
I O
c
3
5
X
I/I
c
«o
-o
1
u
*->
3
T>
"D
C
41
0
Allowable
emissions
based on:
^
c
a.
*
c
UJ
c
3
3
1
U
3
(D
3
T3
2
X
1-
•4J
o
Units of the
regulations
CO
o
^
XU
43
U
in
O
O
0
r- 01
o
in
c
t-
o
W
u
3
Ol
H~
Ol
erenc.
(X
1-
24 1
?~2
TJ
O
_c
I
c
u
3
Footnotes
1 . Q <_ 10 x 106 Btu/h
E = 0.6 lb/106 Btu
10 < Q < 10,000
E=1.090Q-°-2594
q > 10,000
E = 0.10 lb/106 Btu
2. Hood-burning units
q <^ 10 x 106 Btu/h
E = 0.70 lbs/106 Btu
Q > 10 x 106 Btu/h
E^i.iegsq-0-2230
oo
o
(continued)
-------
NORTH CAROLINA (continued)
PART 8. VISIBLE EMISSION REGULATIONS
Political
jurisdiction
State
Existing sources 1
Requirement
Ringelmann
2
U
1
40
a
c
No more tha
minutes
1 hour
52
Exception
Ringelmann
Q.
0
Q
C
5*
*J tl
.3
U C L
113
5 1:
5
o
New sources
Requirement
i
£
oe
i
>.
o
20
IV
c
-------
NORTH DAKOTA
PART A. ALLOWABLE HASS EMISSION HATE FOR INDIRECT HEAT EXCHANGERS
Political
jurisdiction
State
Total heat input
based on:
•a
41
C
«- u
0 3
a
V
m •—
L. V
If
.f^
X
c
O)
M
w
E
i
1
c
Di
VI
4*
T3
*-
41
E C
3 u
•r- £3
X O
4J
C
3
5
X
VI
4-1
C
3
• —
3
••-
••-
C
i— «
U
flj
4->
< —
3
•»-
••-
C
i— •
41
+J
O
Allowable
emissions
based on:
c
a.
4*
"-
C
UJ
4->
3
r-
3
•0
—
C
U
(0
4->
r—
3
•r-
•--
C
X
41
O
Units of the
regulations
3
CD
a
^
K1.2
^
^3
U
10
V)
-O
'
o
o
s
^ St
H-
u
ut
vt
c
i-
1-
41
O
41
U
H-
41
U
C
2
O>
41
QC
1-
262
|
*-»
C
E
41
f-
3
IA
i
Footnotes
1. Existing
E = 0.8 lb/106 Btu
2. New (constructed after 12-15-73)
Q <_ 10 x 106 Btu/h
E = 0.6 lb/106 Btu
Q > 10 x 106 Btu/h
E = o.enq-0-131
CD
M
PART 6. VISIBLE EMISSION REGULATIONS
Political
jurisdiction
State
Existing sources
Requirement
c
Ol
tx.
2
4-»
U
n
40
x
•0
c
c ••-
•a
JZ in
4> 3
1- C 1-
E E 0
Exception
c
E
0)
C
QC
3
4->
U
60
^
n
c
c •*—
•o
4-*
41 3
U C t-
e E o
0 I*
Z 1 rH
4
4)
x:
4-*
O
New sources1
Requirement
c
n
e
O)
tx.
1
x
u
*o
0.
o
20
x
<0
c
a
£ V)
4) 3
(- C t~
E E 0
Exception
c
10
E
0>
c
QC
3
•*-•
U
s
60
10
c
c ••-
n
£ tfl
*• 3
4* 3
1- C t-
ii 0
O 1
4
4»
o
O
4J
C
41
U
in
Footnotes
1. Constructed after 12-15-73.
-------
OHIO
PART A. ALLOWABLE MASS EMISSION RATE FOR INDIRECT HEAT EXCHANGERS
Political
jurisdiction
State
Total heat input
based on:
•o
*- t
O 3
n
3-
|s
1_
Ol
Ul
i
X
c
t-
O TJ
ii
••- X3
X
IV 1-
Z 0
X
(A
C
5
X
in
*J
3
ividual
•o
c
l-t
^
ividual
•o
c
t_
J=
*J
o
Allowable
emissions
based on:
c
Q.
£
*J
C
UJ
ividual
•a
c
^
•3
ividual
•o
c
X
U
o
Units of the
regulations
3
to
£
X1
£
U
•0
~V Wl
XI «
•— Ol
H-
u
tn
VI
C
•0
i.
L.
*J
O
f
3
H-
i
i-
37
1-
38
C.
w
surement
«
PTC-
27
Footnotes
1. Priority I regions - curve 1-37.
Priority II and III regions - 1-38.
00
OJ
PART B. VISIBLE EMISSION REGULATIONS
Political
jurisdiction
State
Existing sources
Requirement
Ringelmann
1
!>
u
a
20
c
§••- 3
E 0
Exception
-
Ringelmann
3
f
60
c
O •»- 3
3
1
New sources
Requirement
RingelHann
£
c
No more thar
minutes i
1 hour
Exception
i
if
\
c
to more thar
— minutes
L hour
|
]
Measurement
ii
Continuous i
lor ing requ
Footnotes
-------
OKLAHOMA
PART A. ALLOWABLE MASS EMISSION RATE FOR INDIRECT HEAT EXCHANGERS
Political
jurisdiction
State
Tulsa
Total heat input
based on:
•o
?
t- L.
O 3
a
u 'i
O> 3
t_
«* ID
X
S
i/t
0)
"D
X
£
X
c
en
0)
H-
O "O
IE
E 3
X
£^
I/I
C
_
5
c
3
3
^
C
X
u
3
•^
^
•I
C.
0
Allowable
emissions
based on:
c
m
o.
Ol
•*->
c
UJ
c
3
>0
'-5
X
u
w
ut
•a
S
•
o
Units of the
regulations
4-*
OQ
p-l
X1
X2
"v.
U
(0
u>
o
o
rH
<*-
U
VI
•-
t-
w
o
O)
u
3
O)
f-
41
U
C
10,000 0.10
2 Q, E, ,
106 Btu/h lb PW/100 h
<10 0.60
TOO 0.35
1,000 0.20
>10,000 0.12
00
PART B. VISIBLE EMISSION REGULATIONS
Political
jurisdiction
State
Tulsa
Existing sources
Requirement
Ringelmann
1
2
>»
•r-
u
10
a
o
20
>>
c
01
c
c ••-
m
£ u>
-»-» at
4->
01 3
O ••- 3
EE,°
I L
Exception
c
i
OJ
O)
c
QC
3
>»
u
(0
o.
0
^
>o
c
c ••-
m
£ V)
^s
« 3
is
o
z
3
O
£
r-l
51
6
U
tl
£.
*>
O
New sources
Requirement
Ringelmann
1
>,
u
ia
a
o
?
(O
c
c •«-
fl
£ «/>
*-5
ai 3
O •»- 3
EBO
5 L
Exception
c
c
»
u
-------
OREGON
PART A. ALLOWABLE MASS EMISSION RATE FOR INDIRECT HEAT EXCHANGERS
Political
jurisdiction
State
Total heat Input
based on:
J
O 3
A
Aggregrate
all fuels
c
IA
Max 1 BUB de
c
Ol
*
Max i mi* of
or burned
M
i
'i
Individual
u
IB
Individual
t_
o
NS1
Allowable
Missions
based on:
c
"a.
t
C
UJ
*>
c
Individual
!
Individual
X
1
o
Units of the
regulations
3
03
*
O
r-f
.O
|
U
3
in
.0
•t.
U
IA
M
C
C9
X2
1
o
C
Ol
H-
Referencc
T>
5
2
*>
Heasurenen
Footnotes
1. NS denotes not specified.
2. Existing - 0.2 gr/scf.
New - 0.1 gr/scf (constructed after 6-1-70)
00
PART B. VISIBLE EMISSION REGULATIONS
Political
jurisdiction
State
Existing sources'
Requirement
c
2
8,
OL
?
^
u
§
40
«
f (ft
ttj
11!
3
Exception
c
1
CK
X
U
1
C
£«
«j •
8Ei
0 I*
Z IrH
1
O
New sources
Requi resent
c
c
1
ac
1
^
I
20
c
C '^
£ M
Q -r- 3
!v
i L
3
Exception
c
c
8.
QC
^
U
s.
o
1
c
g.-
£ IA
-s
€1 3
|
XI
o
*J
s
4-»
w
Heasur
^
il
3
- ?
C ft-
33
Footnotes
1. Existing sources outside special control area and
all existing wood waste boilers.
2. New sources in all areas and existing sources
Inside the special control area (constructed
after 6-1-70).
-------
PENNSYLVANIA
PART A. ALLOWABLE MASS EMISSION HATE FOR INDIRECT HEAT EXCHANGERS
Political
Jurisdiction
State
Al 1 eQheny Co
Philadelphia
Co.
Total heat Input
based on:
T)
*- L
0 3
W
*J Wl
•W —
t- 41
v •*-
X
x
x
O»
wt
W
T3
•
Maxiau
c
•—
01
o -o
fc
-J
"x
TJ U.
=F o
4-1
c
3
«-*
~c
3
3
•o
c
X
x
x
u
4J
•o
•5
c
5
0
Allowable
emissions
based on:
c
ij
ex
«i
c
UJ
*•*
c
3
•o
•o
c
X
x
x
u
*->
1
£
0
Units of the
regulations
3
en
0
X1
X2
x3-'
£
.5
u
2
o
§
^ M
A f*
-— Ol
c
l_
£
U
o>
c
W
u
41
ac.
l-2<
1-3C
•o
Q
f.
«J
W
3
ifl
Footnotes
»
i. 6Q. E<6
106 Btu/h Ib/io" Btu
2.5 < Q < 50 0.4 „ „
50 < Q 7 600 E • 3.6
Q > 600 0.1
2. ,Q, E.fi
10b Btu/h lb/106 Btu
0.2 < 0 < 50 0.40 n ,,
50 < Q < 850 E ' 3.5Q~U'be>
0 i 850 0.08
3. Units built prior to 4-10-79 must meet 0.2 lb/106 Btu.
4. Units built after 4-10-79 must meet 0.1 lb/106 Btu.
5. Coal conversions must meet 0.12 lb/10 Btu after
7-1-80 and 0.06 lb/106 Btu after 7-1-84.
CO
cr>
PART 8 VISIBLE EMISSION REGULATIONS
Political
jurisdiction
State
Philadelphia
S Allegheny
Counties
Existing sources
Requi rcment
c
c
c
1
u
S
20
C
•9
C
s
*J
U
ex
o
20
20
No wore than
minutes in any
1 hour
3
3
Exception
Ringelnann
3
4-*
U
ex
o
60
60
c
c
« *~
C. VI
*-» W
W 3
U C U
0 •- 3
!"is
^ i-.
0
0
1
o
Measurenent nethod |
X1
Continuous aoni- |
toring requirement 1
Footnotes
1. Devices approved by the Department and maintained
to provide opacity measurements, or by trained
observers.
2. Allegheny County new are those constructed after
8-17-71.
-------
RHODE ISLAND
PART A. ALLOWABLE MASS EMISSION RATE FOR INDIRECT HEAT EXCHANGERS
Political
jurisdiction
State
Total heat Input
based on:
•o
«- i.
O 3
QI
S,s
It H-
t-
S
•
Maximu* d
X
c
ot
M
*-
Haxinum o
or burned
c
3
X
i
,
Individua
.at:
3
in
r^
Individua
i-
0
Allowable
emissions
based on:
^
*o.
c
LLJ
C
Individua
u
+J
Individua
X
u
o
Units of the
regulations
.
a
S
X1
|
U
•a
in
\ in
^_
u
i
Heasureme
Footnotes
1. Q. 106 Btu/h E, lb/106 Btu
1 < Q < 250 0.2
Q >_ 250 0.1
00
PART B. VISIBLE EMISSION REGULATIONS
Political
jurisdiction
State
Existing sources
Requirement
c
c
2
f
ae
1
X
u
20
c
C -r-
4-1 4»
r?,
slf
3
Exception
f
2
1
ae
>,
S
C
•0
f M
f 3
•v
Z IrH
2
0
New sources
Requirement
c
c
2
1
CR*
>.
U
C
C t-
4-* «J
• 3 u
SE|
o 1
Z IrH
Exception
c
c
2
f
ae
2-
U
10
Q.
C
C •*-
10
£ in
*J 01
*J
Siu
0 •*- 3
1°
s L
5
9
•a
2
*j
c
u
3
in
«
5 x 10° Btu/h.
-------
SOUTH CAROLINA
PART A. ALLOWABLE MASS EMISSION RATE FOR INDIRECT HEAT EXCHANGERS
Political
jurisdiction
State
Total heat Input
based on:
•o
c
O 3
.O
10 •—
Ol 3
Ot^
•eX. (O
C
Ol
IA
i
3
x
c
o*
01
O "O
0)
§c
t-
e 3
•r- .O
x o
IA
c
3
5
X
IA
4->
C
3
•o
-5
c
u
3
VI
3
•o
1
0)
£
o
Allowable
emissions
based on:
c
19
Q,
-?
UJ
4-»
C
3
•o
•5
c
u
*J
Ul
«o
3
•o
1
X
01
JC
+*
0
Units of the
regulations
3
CO
&
i-H
X1
.C
u
3
O
o
3
^s. in
A «
•— Ol
V-
u
IA
IA
C
m
o
L.
at
o
3
O)
ai
c
t
*»-
Ol
QC
1-31
o
jr
0)
c
3
I
Footnotes
1. Q < 1300 x 106 Btu/h
E = 0.6 lb/106 Btu
Q > 1300 x 106 Btu/h
E - 57.84Q-0'637
Except existing sources prior to February 11, 1971.
Q < 10 x 106 Btu/h
E = 0.8 lb/106 Btu
oo
oo
PART B. VISIBLE EMISSION REGULATIONS
Political
jurisdiction
State
Existing source*
Requl recent
c
f
Of
2
x
u
10
o.
o
id
C -t-
01 3
O ••- 3
"if
Exception
c
§
Ol
c
DC
3
x
u
1
«
C f-
*-t «
• ^
i-ij
o 1
Z IrH
52
k-
o
u 1
New sources'
Requirement
c
c
1
DC
1
x
U
10
a.
0
3
C ••-
a
*j a
§i
o
Z
•l
o
f-«
Exception
c
c
3
V
O)
c
ae
3
x
u
a
a
o
*
C -f-
*•» V
O ••- 3
E E 0
5 1:
52
k_
o
•a
1
^
E
Measur
^
c
"c w
E -r-
o u
3
.£?
4J ••-
C L.
O O
O 4->
X3
Footnotes
1. Constructed after 2-11-71.
2. 20 mln 1n 24-h period.
3. Required for steam generators > 250 x 106 Btu/h
except where only gaseous fuel Is burned, oil or
a mixture of gas and oil Is burned and PM and
visible emission requirements are met, or the
annual average opacity factor Is 30X or less.
-------
SOUTH DAKOTA
PART A. ALLOWABLE MASS EMISSION RATE FOR INDIRECT HEAT EXCHANGERS
Political
jurisdiction
State
Total heat Input
based on:
•o
•»
»* M
S
Haxlnun dei
X
1
ll
U)
C
3
X
VI
«J
C
3
Individual
3
v»
Individual
1
o
Allowable
emissions
based on:
*CL
£
c
UJ
X
c
Individual
|
Individual
1
Units of the
regulations
5
CD
s
"N.
X1
f
"X
J3
M
O
§
t-l
\ *o
Grains/scf
1
o
1
Reference f
TJ
i
i
M
Footnotes
1. Solid fuel or fuel oil
E = 0.30 lb/106 Btu
00
vo
PART B. VISIBLE EMISSION REGULATIONS
Political
jurisdiction
State
Existing sources
Requirement
c
c
8.
OC
1
**
U
o
20
>,
(0
c
•9
C Wl
t- c u
Z | tH
Exception
i
QC
3
**
S
o.
0
60
>,
a
c
K
-a
ol5
Z 1 r~*
3
i-
o
New sources
Requirement
i
I
oc
X
«J
>.
*
c
2.
*> w
J,^
81J
£ IrH
Exception
c
c
1
OC
|
>.
n
4-* «
«J
813
si:
L.
O
1
1
Measur
c
c w
'5
o 2
=f
c t-
0 O
o »>
Footnotes
-------
TENNESSEE
PART A. ALLOWABLE MASS EMISSION RATE FOR INDIRECT HEAT EXCHANGERS
Political
jurisdiction
State
Total heat Input
based on:
«
c
•*- u.
O 3
.0
4-> tn
19 r-
Q) a
u
cn»—
QI*—
X
C
in
01
•o
§
C
o>
VI
o -o
Of
§ £
l_
x: o
in
C
5
X
4-»
C
3
ID
•o
••-
C
U
tn
•D
-a
•n
c
f-
O
Allowable
emissions
based on:
4-»
c
IQ
*0.
*
C
LU
^
C
IV
=1
Tl
•n
C
U
3
u*
^
•2
C
X
w
0
Units of the
regulations
CD
«
r-t
^
X1
J=
^
u
fO
§
o
rH
^ 5>
<*-
(J
Vt
•^
U
tD
W
0
e
O)
£
Ol
u
c
OJ
OP
4)
QC
1-32
[-33
•o
^
I
4-1
c
01
1
VI
T1
Footnotes
1. Diffusion equation If Q < 400 x 106 Btu/h
E = 20650 ah
Q '
a = 0.67 If stack height (h) < 200 ft
0.80 If h > 200 ft
Note: when more than one stack exists, E Is
divided by (N)0-Z5 where N = number of
stacks or use Fig. 1-32 and 1-33.
Existing
Q. 10° Btu/h E, lb/106 Btu
Q 1 10 0.6
10 < Q < 10,000 1.0903Q"0-259''
Q >. 10,000 0.10
VO
o
(continued)
-------
TENNESSEE (continued)
PART A. ALLOWABLE MASS EMISSION RATE FOR INDIRECT HEAT EXCHANGERS
Political
jurisdiction
Total heat Input
based on:
TJ
O a
A
•I
ti^
t- •>
S-S
fe
&
M
i
i
&
M
•»-
Max i Hum o
or burned
3
"c
M
i
Individua
u
3
V)
ID
3
•o
TX
C
+J
Allowablt
emissions
based on:
c
*Q.
£
C
C
Individua
u
3
in
Individua
u
Unlts of the
regulations
eo
i-i
S
It
M
A
"*-v M
JO 250 0.10
2. Wood-fired units existing (corrected to 12X C02)
Q £ 50 x 106 Btu/h
E = 0.33 gr/sdcf
Q ^ 100 x 106 Btu/h
E * 0.10 lb/106 Btu
Interpolate 50-100 Btu/h
New (constructed after 4-3-72)
Q <_ 25 X 106 Btu/h
E = 0.33 gr/sdcf
vo
(continued)
-------
TENNESSEE (continued)
PART A. ALLOWABLE MASS EMISSION RATE FOR INDIRECT HEAT EXCHANGERS
Political
Jurisdiction
Hamilton Co.
Total heat input
based on:
•o
t>
<*- L.
0 3
W
t- 'at
Ot 3
«c «
O)
wt
4)
|
X
X
c
01
41
•*-
ll
st
»: 0
-
5
X
U)
c
1 —
•o
c
u
4-*
W»
i —
I
C
4-*
O
Allowable
emissions
based on:
c
Ol
c
UJ
4-»
c
3
i —
•o
c
u
4J
1 —
•o
i
X
5
o
Units of the
regulations
D
CO
O
o
i
x3
-v.
a
u
-»S
(A
.Q
§
-O ra
•- 01
t-
u
\
Ul
c
1-
o
u
o
3
O)
£
£
o>
oc
1-32
1-33
TJ
4->
V
E
C
1
£
Footnotes
Q £ 100 x 106 Btu/h
E = 0.20 gr/sdcf
Interpolate 25-100 Btu/h
3. Existing - Schedule I
New - Schedule 2 or schedule 3 If built after
January 1, 1975
Q, 106 Btu/h E. lb/106 Btu
I 11 III
0-10 0.60 0.60 0.60
100 0.40 0.33 0.17
1,000 0.27 0.18 0.10
to
(continued)
-------
TENNESSEE (continued)
PART B. VISIBLE EMISSION REGULATIONS
Political
jurisdiction
State
All areas ex-
cept Davidson,
Hamilton. Knox
and Shelby Co.3
Existing sources
Requirement
c
1
Si
DC
1
2
^
u
§
20
40
n
c
c •*-
C Wl
^a
•1 3
1- C 1.
I'i 3
i i:
52
Exception
c
c
m
E
Si
£
>.
*l
u
1
>
c
t
f in
tt
i'i o
i
rH
ft.
O
New sources
Requirement
c
i
«
O!
C
ac.
i
2
u
£
o
20
40
>
c'
m
c
£ in
i'i
s.
o
r-4
52
Exception
c
c
s.
c
•JJ
1
a
c
2 wi
^l
i'i o
5 1:
t
«i
i
.p
4-*
i
C
i
u
Wl
m
4-»
c
i]
in cr
1s
C Dl
••- C
C U
0 0
X
Footnotes
1. Constructed after 4-3-72.
2. 20 min in any 24-h.
3. Hood-fired units > 100 x 106 Btu/h.
If other emission sources exhaust through
the same stack:
y = 40.0 Vw + 20.0 VR
where: V - opacity standard, I
Vw = exhaust flow rate, dscf, from
wood-fired unit
VR = exhaust flow rate, dscf, other
emission sources.
vo
U)
-------
TEXAS
PART A. ALLOWABLE MASS EMISSION RATE FOR INDIRECT HEAT EXCHANGERS
Political
jurisdiction
State
Total heat Input
based on:
•o
41
c
H- t-
O 3
41
U 41
O> 3
t.
<"S
X
c
Ol
-s
E
1
C
O)
I/I
Ol
<*-
o -o
41
§c
L.
E 3
••- .a
m t-
a: o
VI
4-*
C
3
5
in
c
3
^
3
"O
•r-
C
X
u
in
'•O
•o
..-
c
41
4-1
O
Allowable
emissions
based on:
4->
c
no
o.
4>
•r-
UJ
4-*
C
n
3
•*-
..-
c
X
u
3
^
•r-
-,-
C
a>
o
Units of the
regulations
4-»
CD
«O
S
5
X1
-C
.a
X2
JHC
u
3
in
rt
o
g
o
1-1
J3 id
•— at
u
i/i
i/i
•^
u
o
ai
o
X3
Of
t-
3
Ol
t-
Ol
^
U
0.
o
30
15
c*
Kt
C
« '*"
£ IA
4-* «
-*-•
41 3
U C (-
I e o
° 1*
Z | rH
5
52
Exception
c
c
s
4*
Oi
c
°£
^
4J
U
O.
o
c*
c
c •--
5 »
4> ^
ecu
O -r- 3
E E 0
O 1
Z 1 rH
t
5
o
New sources'
Requirement
c
c
3
S
C
*
^
u
J
o
20
15
I
•»
c
c -»-
£ in
+-• 0>
4) =
1- C
u
§•*- 3
e o
o
z
x:
iH
5
Exception
c
c
s.
c
QC
^
u
Q.
O
£»
•0
c
c -^
£ in
4J 41
*3
41 3
U C U
§•»- 3
E 0
, x:
o
Z 1 r-4.
u
5
o
•o
o
I
c
u
3
i/l
10
X
^J
c
"c S
E ••-
sl
O t-
3
c o>
•r- C
4J -r~
C U
O O
CJ 4->
X3
Footnotes
1. Constructed after 1-31-72.
2. Sources with flow rate > 100,000 acfm unless
opacity monitor is Installed in flue.
3. General opacity requirement for any stationary
flue with more than 100,000 acfm and greater
than 151 opacity averaged over a 5 minute period.
General S0? requirements for primary nonferrous
smelters and any sulfurlc acid plant using SO,
control on such smelters.
-------
UTAH
PART A. ALLOWABLE MASS EMISSION RATE FOR INDIRECT HEAT EXCHANGERS
Political
jurisdiction
State
Total heat input
based on:
1
t- t-
O 3
a
Aggregrate
all fuels
c
01
Max i At* de
X
c
Ol
O V
|!
in
i
X
m
C
3
T3
1
3
M
I*J
3
•o
1
*-»
Allowable
emissions
based on:
c
•0
ex
c
^
c
T5
?
X
-
(A
*
3
^
1
£
Units of the
regulations
ID
*
A
X1
i
U
«-»
Ml
O
o
u
ut
1.
*J
o
C
V
u
c
ac
1
«
Footnotes
1. 10 lbs/106 Btu (0.18 gr/itm calories).
•OD
tn
PART B. VISIBLE EMISSION REGULATIONS
Political
jurisdiction
State
Uasatch
Front area
Existing sources
Requirement
c
c
c*
c
„
1
40
20
|
£S
• 3
U C U
J"l-
Exception
i
ee.
x
1
£
c
i;
*-» «•
el.
f "5 o
s i:
a
3
o
New sources '
Requiremenl
i
1
QC
X
4-*
O
70
|
c
c •*-
IV
C VI
«-> w
5 1:
Exception
c
c
Ol
c
ac
x
u
1*
o.
o
5
e
c —
^1
s i:
3
£
O
|
S
remnt
w
*
«J
C
Q £
I*
Is
Footnotes
1. Constructed after 4-?5-71.
-------
VERMONT
PART A. ALLOWABLE MASS EMISSION RATE FOR INDIRECT HEAT EXCHANGERS
Political
jurisdiction
State
Total heat input
based on:
•o
«
c
>*- u
O 3
£J
4>
+J in
« r—
t- 4>
O) 3
ft* H—
t-
01 —
Olf—
a
+J
5
•a
•o
•-.
X
*
0
Allowable
emissions
based on:
4-»
c
fl)
a.
a»
£
UJ
4-*
C
3
3
^
•o
^
^e
u
»0
+J
VI
10
3
TJ
•5
^
X
Of
£
O
Units of the
regulations
a
4-*
CD
rH
*v
^
X1
£
\
^
^
u
3
i/i
-Q
O
O
rH
^. in
f— en
H-
u
VI
\
IA
ra
o
ai
-C
0
3
O)
t4-
01
(J
c
ai
OP
•*-
a:
1-31
TO
o
£
*j
i
+j
c
i
01
u
tn
m
z
Footnotes
1. Existing
Q <_ 10 x 106 Btu/h
E = 0.5 lb/106 Btu
(0.90 g/106 cal)
10 < Q < 300
E - 1.4865Q-0'"32
Q >_ 300
E = 1.0 lb/106 Btu
(0.18 q/106 cal)
PART B. VISIBLE EMISSION REGULATIONS
Political
jurisdiction
State
Existing sources
Requirement
c
!
1
3
2
>,
I
60
40
c
c.
n
+j «i
olJ
Z IrH
0
6
Exception
c
c
(O
B
C
oe.
>.
u
a.
0
>
c
"
c
»
u
>a
s
60
20
c
c
jg *~
£ in
«J 01
S3
C U
§•»- 3
E 0
0
6
Exception
c
3
01
s
o
o.
o
X
c
c
•0
4-» 01
01 3
U C i-
t-
s
o
o
O)
E
4-*
01
u
I/I
i
C
1 2:
C W
Q (-
3
Wl O"
3 a>
3
c at
c t~
0 0
Footnotes
1. Constructed after 7-1-71.
-------
VIRGINIA
PART A. ALLOWABLE MASS EMISSION RATE FOR INDIRECT HEAT EXCHANGERS
Jurisdiction
State
AQCR 7
Total heat Input
based on:
c
•*- L.
O 3
** *ft
U
&
M
i
1
&
VI
*.
;i
* a
Su
X
M
C
^
X
M
«J
C
3
1
17
C
3
«*
1
c
5
Allowable
emissions
based on:
c
*v
"a.
«*
*>
c
UJ
c
I
1
u
5
M
1
1
X
ft.
5
a
Units of the
regulations
m
jQ
X1
X2
f
u
3
in
A
§
5S
u
Ml
M
t.
u
1
a
r
Ol
£
2
I
*J
c
I
3
M
Footnotes
1. Q < 10 x 106 Btu/h
E • 0.6 lb/106 Btu
c
10 £ Q < 10,000 x 10° Btu/h
Q > 10.000 x 106 Btu/h
E • 0.10 lb/106 Btu
2. 0 < 100 x 106 Btu/h
E • 0.3 lb/106 Btu
100 < Q < 10,000 x 106 Btu/h
E • 0.900H-0-"86
Q > 10.000 x 10S Btu/h
E - 0.10 Ib/Btu
vo
PART B. VISIBLE EMISSION REGULATIONS
Political
jurisdiction
State
Existing sources
Requirement
c
ee
5-
U
O.
o
20
1
Is
• 3
J":
*
Exception
c
c
1
oc
u
•ff
ex
o
•fj
i;
«-l •
* i u
IV
£ L
k
JC
*>
o
New sources
Requirement
R1ngel«ann
Z
a.
o
If
** 41
!',*
Z lr-<
Exception
i
C
QC
I
r
C
*-» •
**
MI
s L
s
•o
I
c
Wl
-------
WASHINGTON
PART A. ALLOWABLE MASS EMISSION RATE FOR INDIRECT HEAT EXCHANGERS
Political
jurisdiction
State
NH Air Pollu-
tion Control
Auth.
Puget Sound
SW Air Pollu
tion Control
Auth.
Olympic Air
Pollution
Control Auth
I Allowable
Total heat Input
based on:
c
H- U
O 3
01
«-> I/I
l~ 01
Ol 3
at **-
£-
CJI-—
Oi-—
c
at
W»
at
-o
E
X
X
c
(A
01
T3
O -D
§C
L
e 3
••- &
X
ID U
X 0
U)
C
3
^
in
c
ig
•o
>
C
u
QC
o
£
«J
c
01
3
1
Footnotes
1. Existing - 0.20 qr/dscf
New - 0.10 gr/dscf (constructed after 10-5-73)
2. Existing - 0.20 gr/scf
New - 0.05 gr/scf
3. Existing - 0.10 g/scf
New - 0.05 g/scf
4. Wood residue
Existing - 0.20 qr/scf
New - 0.10 gr/scf
5. 0.10 gr/scf
Hog-fuel - 0.2 gr/scf
Natural gas - 0.3 gr/scf
6. NS denotes not specified.
<£>
CO
(continued)
-------
WASHINGTON (continued)
PART B. VISIBLE EMISSION REGULATIONS
Political
jurisdiction
State
NW Air Pollu
tlon Auth.
Puget Sound
SW Air Pollu
tlon Control
Auth.
Olympic Air
Pollution
Control
Yakima Co.
Clean Air
Auth.
Spokane Co.
Air Pollutior
Control Auth,
Existing sources
Requirement
01
01
c
oc
2
2
2
2
1
1
x
U
I
40
40
40
40
20
20
>.
Id
C
S""
VI
il 1
i i:
31.2
31'2
34
3
3
3
3
Exception
c
c
s,
c
2-3
2-3
^
£
10
>.
Id
C
s-
"S
Of 3
K- C L.
Sei
si:
65
65
Jj
o
New sources
Requirement
c
c
in
E
01
Ol
c
oc
\
1
1
1
S"~
o.
o
20
20
20
20
>.
W
C
£ in
"3
01 3
U C 1-
I'i o
s i:
31,3
3
3
3
Exception
c
c
8.
c
K
2
^
U
a.
o
40
>.
id
c
£ M
^S
Ol 3
t. C t-
I5|?
15
i-
Ot
0
|
01
E
C
i
u
3
in
*
c
1 4V
3
in o*
§2
.I.™
C 1-
0 0
u *>
X
Footnotes
1. Not exceed IS mln In any consecutive 8-h.
2. Does not apply If source meeting < 0.20 gr/dscf.
3. Does not apply If source meeting < 0.10 gr/dscf.
4. Does not apply to equipment utilizing wood residue
when source is meeting < 0.05 gr/scf.
5. Hog fuel boiler.
6. Constructed after 10-5-73.
vo
-------
WEST VIRGINIA
PART A. ALLOWABLE MASS EMISSION RATE FOR INDIRECT HEAT EXCHANGERS
Political
Jurisdiction
State
Total heat Input
based on:
w
c
«- t_
O 3
n
ty
•a —
L. *
* *~
en.—
^ "«
C
en
v>
TJ
5
-5
X
*
X
X
c
.,_
tn
V
•o
o -o
•1
1 o
M
C
~
X
£
c
3
3
TI
'
O
3
TJ
=
5
Al lowabie
emissions
based on:
c
Q.
C
X
^,
c
3
TJ
?
O
4-1
3
T3
^
5
Units of the
regulations
ID
t-H
-*x
X1'2
,e
^
(J
Ul
*~
|
I-*
•^ s
o
vt
^
^_
IV
t_
V
J=
o
en
s-e
o
o
«J
B
*>
C
i
1
in
i
Footnotes
1. If plant Is expanded by addition of new unit, allowable
emission rate for new unit shall be determined as
follows:
where.
R * total allowable emission rate 1n pounds per hour
for the new fuel burning unit(s);
H . » total design heat Input In 10* Btu's/h of the
existing and new similar units;
R . • total allowable emission rate In Ibs/h
corresponding to H.t; and
H • total design heat Input In 10* Btu's/h for the
new fuel burning un1t(s).
2. Type "a" units
Product of 0.05 and total design heat Inputs,
no more than 1200 Ibs/h.
Type "b" units
Product of 0.09 and total design heat Inputs,
no more than 600 Ibs/h.
Type "c" units
10* Btu/h Ib/h
10 3.4
100 16.6
3.333 300.0
No more than 300 Ib/h
where:
(1) Type "a" Is any unit which has primary purpose
of generating steam to produce electric power
for sale.
(2) Type "b" Is any unit not classified as "a" or "c".
(3) Type "c" Is any hand-fired or stoker-fired unit.
O
o
(continued)
-------
WEST VIRGINIA (continued)
PART 0. VISIBLE EMISSION REGULATIONS
Political
Jurisdiction
State
Existing sources
Requl resent
c
c
1
.5
5-
I
|
C
5 "*~
*>
Cgi.
8-1
£ ^
•
Exception
i
1
oe
1
2
x
a
a.
o
1
c
C f
C M
3C r-l
81
2
1
1203
I203
IcU
k
0
New sources
Requirement
c
c
1
DC
5-
i
1
c
c ••-
f 1
III
£ ,-,
Exception
i
I
oe
x
I
>.
e
c -*-
?!
o
Z rH
L.
O
|
S
C
3
w
1
C
1 5
• *»-
ii
C 9
c'u
o o
«J.»
Footnotes
I. Exemption applies to soot blowing and firebox
cleaning and Is applicable during any 8 h
period.
2. Exemption applies to start-up of units except
hand-fired or stoker-fired.
3. Exemption applies to start-up of hand-fired
or stoker-fired units. Rlngelnan 13 for first
45 minutes. Rlngelman 12 for remaining 75
minutes.
4. Director may require - general requirement.
-------
WISCONSIN
PART A. AUOWABIF MASS EMISSION RATE FOR INDIRECT HEAT EXCHANGERS
Political
jurisdict ion
Statp
,
Total heat input
based on.
a*
c
•*- t_
.O
ITJ —
C- Ol
O> Z3
u
01 —
/I
—
-^>
c
•— •
X
Oi
o
Units of thp
regulations
3
01
'O
o
1-1
.0
•—
X1
£
•—
o
*J
tn
XI
O
i-H
— 01
•*-
o
I/I
.^
o
«
*J
o
Oi
o>
^
41
(j
c
l-
tu
c*:
3-2
3-3
3-4
3-5
•D
4J
E
^j
t_
^
Ol
s:
Footnotes
1. Category I - New or modified sources (except in
Southeast Wisconsin Intrastate AQCR)
Q _'_ 250 x 106 Btu/h E - 0.15 lb/106 Btu
Q > 250 x 106 Btu/h E = 0.10 lh/106 Btu
Existing Lake Michigan Intrastate AQCR Fig. 3-5
(ASME No. APS-1) with maximum E, irrespective of
", 0.6 Ib/in6 ntu.
All sources in Southeast Wisconsin Intrastate AQCR.
(Q < 250 x 106 Btii/h - Not permitted to burn coal).
All sources - 0.15 lb/106 Btu.
Existing sources (except Michigan and S.E. Wisconsin
Intrastate AOCR'sj Fiq. 3-6 (ASME NO APS-1) with
max E = 0.3 lb/10& Btu.
O
M
(continued)
-------
WISCONSIN (continued)
PART B. VISIBLE EMISSION REGULATIONS
Political
Jurisdiction
Category I
Category II -
control plan
submitted by
July 1. 1971
compliance
by July 1,
1973
Category III
or IV - Lake
Interstate
AQCR, South-
east Wiscon-
sin Intra-
state
Existing sources
Requirement
c
c
1
2
1
>.
\
40
20
C
c
s-
£ Ul
tl
ill
^ IH
Exception
c
•1
o>
c
4
4
$
I
80
80
c
m
c
C -r-
.
I
20
|
C
tl
iii
? IH
Exception
c
c
I
4
^
80
!
c
*J 41
4-*
iii
? IH
52
I
•o
O
c.
E
«J
C
1
3
«A
m
•I
|C
"5
ui cr
1s
C D>
Footnotes
1. Constructed after 4-1-72.
2. Cleaning and starting fire but not more than
3 times/day. If stack test Is run concurrently
with Ringelmann test, opacity should be set 101
above average read by stack test.
o
U)
-------
WYOMING
PART A. ALLOWABLE MASS EMISSION RATE FOR INDIRECT HEAT EXCHANGERS
Political
jurisdiction
State
Total heat input
based on:
Aggregrate of
all fuels burned
MaxiHui design
X
Haximun of design
or burned
U)
C
3
X
I/I
C
(O
3
-o
>
1
3
*
3
C
t_
0)
JC
O
Allowable
emissions
based on:
c
(0
Q.
£
'i
LU
4-1
C
3
•o
>
1
U
•9
3
T3
•>
•5
C
X
o
Units of the
regulations
3
CO
O
rH
JO
X1
JC
JQ
U
3
JO
O
O
o
l-t
JO fO
>— O)
lins/scf
u
Ol
o
erence figure
£
1-41
•o
o
JC
4-*
I
I
Footnotes
1. Existing
Q,106 Btu/h E, lb/106 Btu
Q <^ 10 0.6
10 < Q < 10,000 0.8963I"0'1743
Q >_ 10,000 0.18
PART B. VISIBLE EMISSION REGULATIONS
Political
jurisdiction
State2
Existing sources
Requirement
c
n
E
0>
c
oc.
>>
u
s
40
•>
(0
JC vi
*J
01 I
E
O
JC
6
Exception
c
10
E
O)
c
oc
>^
u
,
4?
u
40
F
c
c •*-
O -f- 3
E E 0
0 I*
Z IrH
6
U
U
JC
4-*
o
•o
JC
4-*
4-*
3
I/I
<0
Ol
z:
^j
7=1
E 'f"
3
C (-
O O
o *-»
Footnotes
1. Constructed after 4-9-73.
2. Source specific opacity limits will be established
for large fuel burning units which can not meet
20% opacity limit.
-------
AMERICAN SAMOA
PART A. ALLOWABLE MASS EMISSION RATE FOR INDIRECT HEAT EXCHANGERS
Political
jurisdiction
Territory
Total heat Input
based on:
0 3
Aggregrate
all fuels 1
&
I
i
&
Wl
41
•o
O T»
IE
X
X
Wl
c
£
Wl
c
3
1
TJ
C
I
Wl
1
•o
c
X
5
o
Allowable
Missions
based on:
Q.
t
tl
UJ
X
«i
§
Individual
u
3
in
Individual
u
u
o
Units of the
regulations
I
s
a
X1
c.
2.
I
Wl
A
S
o
r-4
A IV
•— Ot
lins/scf
u
u
o
£
Ol
>renc* 1
«
£
I
isurement
JE
Footnotes
1. 0.10 lb/106 Btu.
o
01
PART B. VISIBLE EMISSION REGULATIONS
Political
jurisdiction
Territory
Existing sources
Requirement
i
1
oe
1
^
u
o
ZO
c
C i-
*-3
HI
"if
Exception
c
f
DC
3
^
u
o
60
c
c ••-
O — 3
oG|°
i U
3
u
o
New sources
Requirement
i
1
ac
^
Q.
O
41
.3
t. C k.
iii
S 1*
U
*>
o
method
u
3
Wl
I
moni-
i rement
3 V
0 <-
3
££
C U
o o
CJ **
Footnotes
-------
GUAM
PART A. AUOWABLF MASS EMISSION RATE FOR INDIRECT HEAT EXCHANGERS
Pol i tical
jurisdiction
Territory
Total heat input
based on:
TJ
ID
c
"+- t-
O D
r>
o>
IT) r—
L 01
cn =3
u
cn —
cn —
0
H
C
CT
kp
or
TJ
o TJ
0)
e c
a t.
•- £3
X
(0 L
i: o
-«->
c
O
NS>
AlTowaBle
emissions
based on:
4-*
C
ftJ
Q.
n>
3
•o
T)
C
(V
-C
4-»
CD
NS1
Units of the
regulations
3
*J
CD
«
O
i-H
\
£l
x:
JD
^
o
•B
+J
r>
(^
O
O
r-l
~N^ in
£3 n
— CT
•4-
o
Hi
i_
3
CT>
O)
U
C
OJ
ID
(U
o:
TJ
Q
c.
+J
Of
E
4->
c
(V
E
or
u
13
i/t
m
01
•3L
Tootnotes
1. NS denotes not specified.
PART 8 VISIBLE EMISSION REGULATIONS
Political
jurisdiction
Territory
Existing sources
Requirement
c
c
n
E
41
f
oc.
1
X
u
o.
o
20
>.
«
c
c •*-
5 tA
Of 3
O 1
Exception
c
c
O>
c
3
^
u
«
ex
0
60
>,
,
u
1
>,
«
c
C -r-
_£; y,
* i u
la|
O I
Z 1 rH
Exception
c
c
1
oc
x
u
•a
o
>,
19
C
-C «
•1 3
§•»- 3
E 0
Z If-l
U
O
?
**
*
c
1
W)
c
i g
s-
i/i O*
ia
•*— C
c t~
0 -M
Footnotes
-------
PUERTO RICO
PART A. ALLOWABLE MASS EMISSION RATE FOR INDIRECT HEAT EXCHANGERS
Political
jurisdiction
Territory
Total heat Input
based on:
•a
°l
Aggregrata
all futls 1
X
«
Maximum dt
o»
«
O tJ
•"•• J3
X
n L.
X 0
M
C
£
W
C
3
•o
TJ
C
•j;
VI
1
1
X
5
o
Allowable
emissions
based on:
^
"a.
t
ti
iU
^
c
3
Idividual
K-.
J<
U
3
M
Idividual
>-i
X
t.
o
Units of the
regulations
3
ID
s
—
X1
•N.
r-
J<
U
Ml
rH
Grains/scf
1
o
£
Reference f
•o
5
0)
E
Measurement
Footnotes
1. 0.30 1b/106 Btu.
PART B. VISIBLE EMISSION REGULATIONS
Political
Jurisdiction
Terrl tory
Existing sources
Requirement
i
1
oe
1
If
S
s
20
c
l«
-5
l"i!
Exception
c
c
1
3
5-
U
I
60
c
s i:
41
U
o
New sources
Requirement
c
8,
(K
1
o
1
c
c •.-
^1
i. c u
£i|
Exception
,
I
OC
iS-
1
C
c ••-
l"i!
*J
o
i
*j
i
3
VI
i
nuous moni-
j requirement
^- c
+> '*-
C U
o o
o «->
Footnotes
1. Any 30 minutes.
-------
VIRGIN ISLANDS
PART A. ALLOWABIF MASS EMISSION RATE FOR INDIRECT HEAT EXCHANGERS
O
oo
- - -
Political
jurisdiction
Territory
_ .__ _ .......
Total heat input
based on:
"O
Of
«•- t-
0 3
n
(0 —
Ol 3
5*«
x
c
01
IB
V
3
x:
c
01
rj
"*-
91
§C
L.
*TJ t-
z: o
c
^
vt
c
•—
3
••-
—
C
X
u
1 —
•r-
—
c
a*
o
AI lowabte
eml ss ions
based on:
c
Q.
O)
-,-
C
UJ
c
—
3
•r-
-,-
C
X
•M
1 —
3
••-
•^
C
«
O
Units of the
rngulations
3
CD
'JO
2
£
X1
.c
£
u
(0
XI
o
o
r-*
£ g,
•*-
VI
VI
•-
O
0)
0
1-4;
O
or
E
c
F
u
VI
£
- - -
Tootnotes
1. lOj'h 1b/106 Btu
< 10 0.60
100 0.352
1,000 0.207
>. 10,000 0.09
PART B VISIBLE EMISSION REGULATIONS
Political
Jurisdiction
Territory
Existing sources
Requirement
c
(0
E
V
o>
c
on
2
u
iV
ex
0
40
;
c
T)
C
C —
to
.C u
01 :
u c
O -r-
E E
o
t-
O
i-H
Exception
c
c
Ol
c
a;
*_>
u
fQ
a.
o
?
c
c
c —
lfl
a; -
1- C
tf
o
u
3
O
JC
i-H
L.
41
^
+J
0
New sources
Requi rement
c
e
w
C7I
C
1
u
•0
a
o
20
c
c
c -
IV
c wt
4-1 «
*J
U C L.
§— 3
E 0
1 1:
Exception
c
c
ft
c
2
u
•fl
Q.
O
40
S
c
c —
-C VI
Ol 3
E- C (-
E E O
O 1
Z IrH
6
U
«P
•o
o
E
C
Of
E
W
3
tf)
Ol
*
^
C
i J(
C IV
0 (-
e ^
3
3 V
0 «-
3
** -^
C t-
o o
Footnotes
-------
REFERENCES
1. Regulations and Non-Regulatory Revisions to State Implementation Plan:
Alabama. EPA 450/2-80-007. July 1980.
2. Regulations and Non-Regulatory Revisions to State Implementation Plan:
Alaska. EPA 450/2-80-008. July 1980.
3. Regulations and Non-Regulatory Revisions to State Implementation Plan:
Arizona. EPA 450/2-80-009. July 1980.
4. Regulations and Non-Regulatory Revisions to State Implementation Plan:
Arkansas. EPA 450/2-80-010. July 1980.
5. Regulations and Non-Regulatory Revisions to State Implementation Plan:
California. EPA 450/2-80-011. July 1980.
6. Regulations and Non-Regulatory Revisions to State Implementation Plan:
Colorado. EPA 450/2-80-012. July 1980.
7. Regulations and Non-Regulatory Revisions to State Implementation Plan:
Connecticut. EPA 450/2-80-013. July 1980.
8. Regulations and Non-Regulatory Revisions to State Implementation Plan:
Delaware. EPA 450/2-80-014. July 1980.
9. Regulations and Non-Regulatory Revisions to State Implementation Plan:
District of Columbia. EPA 450/2-80-015. July 1980.
10. Regulations and Non-Regulatory Revisions to State Implementation Plan:
Florida. EPA 450/2-80-016. July 1980.
11. Regulations and Non-Regulatory Revisions to State Implementation Plan:
Georgia. EPA 450/2-80-017. July 1980.
12. Regulations and Non-Regulatory Revisions to State Implementation Plan:
Hawaii. EPA 450/2-80-018. July 1980.
13. Regulations and Non-Regulatory Revisions to State Implementation Plan:
Idaho. EPA 450/2-80-019. July 1980.
14. Regulations and Non-Regulatory Revisions to State Implementation Plan:
Illinois. EPA 450/2-80-020. July 1980.
15. Regulations and Non-Regulatory Revisions to State Implementation Plan:
Indiana. EPA 450/2-80-021. July 1980.
109
-------
16. Regulations and Non-Regulatory Revisions to State Implementation Plan:
Iowa. EPA 450/2-80-022. July 1980.
17. Regulations and Non-Regulatory Revisions to State Implementation Plan:
Kansas. EPA 450/2-80-023. July 1980.
18. Regulations and Non-Regulatory Revisions to State Implementation Plan:
Kentucky. EPA 450/2-80-024. July 1980.
19. Regulations and Non-Regulatory Revisions to State Implementation Plan:
Louisiana. EPA 450/2-80-025. July 1980.
20. Regulations and Non-Regulatory Revisions to State Implementation Plan:
Maine. EPA 450/2-80-026. July 1980.
21. Regulations and Non-Regulatory Revisions to State Implementation Plan:
Maryland. EPA 450/2-80-027. July 1980.
22. Regulations and Non-Regulatory Revisions to State Implementation Plan:
Massachusetts. EPA 450/2-80-028. July 1980.
23. Regulations and Non-Regulatory Revisions to State Implementation Plan:
Michigan. EPA 450/2-80-029. July 1980.
24. Regulations and Non-Regulatory Revisions to State Implementation Plan:
Minnesota. EPA 450/2-80-030. July 1980.
25. Regulations and Non-Regulatory Revisions to State Implementation Plan:
Mississippi. EPA 450/2-80-031. July 1980.
26. Regulations and Non-Regulatory Revisions to State Implementation Plan:
Missouri. EPA 450/2-80-032. July 1980.
27. Regulations and Non-Regulatory Revisions to State Implementation Plan:
Montana. EPA 450/2-80-033. July 1980.
28. Regulations and Non-Regulatory Revisions to State Implementation Plan:
Nebraska. EPA 450/2-80-034. July 1980.
29. Regulations and Non-Regulatory Revisions to State Implementation Plan:
Nevada. EPA 450/2-80-035. July 1980.
30. Regulations and Non-Regulatory Revisions to State Implementation Plan:
New Hampshire. EPA 450/2-80-036. July 1980.
31. Regulations and Non-Regulatory Revisions to State Implementation Plan:
New Jersey. EPA 450/2-80-037. July 1980.
32. Regulations and Non-Regulatory Revisions to State Implementation Plan:
New Mexico. EPA 450/2-80-038. July 1980.
110
-------
33. Regulations and Non-Regulatory Revisions to State Implementation Plan:
New York. EPA 450/2-80-039. July 1980.
34. Regulations and Non-Regulatory Revisions to State Implementation Plan:
North Carolina. EPA 450/2-80-040. July 1980.
35. Regulations and Non-Regulatory Revisions to State Implementation Plan:
North Dakota. EPA 450/2-80-041. July 1980.
36. Regulations and Non-Regulatory Revisions to State Implementation Plan:
Ohio. EPA 450/2-80-042. July 1980.
37. Regulations and Non-Regulatory Revisions to State Implementation Plan:
Oklahoma. EPA 450/2-80-043. July 1980.
38. Regulations and Non-Regulatory Revisions to State Implementation Plan:
Oregon. EPA 450/2-80-044. July 1980.
39. Regulations and Non-Regulatory Revisions to State Implementation Plan:
Pennsylvania. EPA 450/2-80-045. July 1980.
40. Regulations and Non-Regulatory Revisions to State Implementation Plan:
Rhode Island. EPA 450/2-80-046. July 1980.
41. Regulations and Non-Regulatory Revisions to State Implementation Plan:
South Carolina. EPA 450/2-80-047. July 1980.
42. Regulations and Non-Regulatory Revisions to State Implementation Plan:
South Dakota. EPA 450/2-80-048. July 1980.
43. Regulations and Non-Regulatory Revisions to State Implementation Plan:
Tennessee. EPA 450/2-80-049. July 1980.
44. Regulations and Non-Regulatory Revisions to State Implementation Plan:
Texas. EPA 450/2-80-050. July 1980.
45. Regulations and Non-Regulatory Revisions to State Implementation Plan:
Utah. EPA 450/2-80-051. July 1980.
46. Regulations and Non-Regulatory Revisions to State Implementation Plan:
Vermont. EPA 450/2-80-052. July 1980.
47. Regulations and Non-Regulatory Revisions to State Implementation Plan:
Virginia. EPA 450/2-80-053. July 1980.
48. Regulations and Non-Regulatory Revisions to State Implementation Plan:
Washington. EPA 450/2-80-054. July 1980.
49. Regulations and Non-Regulatory Revisions to State Implementation Plan:
West Virginia. EPA 450/2-80-055. July 1980.
Ill
-------
50. Regulations and Non-Regulatory Revisions to State Implementation Plan:
Wisconsin. EPA 450/2-80-056. July 1980.
51. Regulations and Non-Regulatory Revisions to State Implementation Plan:
Wyoming. EPA 450/2-80-057. July 1980.
52. Regulations and Non-Regulatory Revisions to State Implementation Plan:
American Samoa. EPA 450/2-80-058. July 1980.
53. Regulations and Non-Regulatory Revisions to State Implementation Plan:
Gaum. EPA 450/2-80-059. July 1980.
54. Regulations and Non-Regulatory Revisions to State Implementation Plan:
Puerto Rico. EPA 450/2-80-060. July 1980.
55. Regulations and Non-Regulatory Revisions to State Implementation Plan:
Virgin Islands. EPA 450/2-80-061. July 1980.
56. State Implementation Plans Emission. Regulations for Particulate
Matter: Fuel Combustion. EPA 450/2-76-010. August 1976.
57- Control of Particulate Matter from Oil Burners and Boilers. EPA 450/
3-76-005. April 1976.
58. Compilation of Air Pollutant Emission Factors. Second edition. AP-42.
February 1980.
59. Smith, W. S. and C. W. Gruber. Atmospheric Emissions from Coal Combus-
tion. An Inventory Guide. U.S. Department of Health Education and
Welfare. AP-24. April 1966.
60. Roek, D. R., and R. Dennis. Technology Assessment Report for Industrial
Boiler Applications: Particulate Collection. EPA 600/7-79-178h.
December 1979.
61. Compilation and Analysis of State Regulations for S02, NO , Opacity,
Continuous Monitoring, and Applicable Test Methods. Prepared for U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency by Engineering Science under EPA Con-
tract No. 68-01-4146, Task No. 40. June 1978.
112
-------
APPENDIX A
REFERENCE FIGURES FOR ALLOWABLE
EMISSION RATES
113
-------
1.000,
CD
O
i—I
_O
OO
O
I—I
oo
I/O
I—I
UJ
UJ
_J
oa
o
_j
_i
•=C
.001
10
100 1,000
HEAT INPUT, 106 Btu/h
Reference Figure 1-1.
10,000
50,000
-------
l.OOOr-
CO
u>
O
co
O
I—«
CO
CO
HH
LU
LU
—I
CO
O
_J
_l
eC
.001
10
100 1,000
HEAT INPUT, 106 Btu/h
10,000
50,000
Reference Figure 1-2.
-------
(Ti
CO
u>
o
o
I — I
oo
CQ
-------
.1
•M
CO
ID
o
in
•z.
o
CO
CO
LU
_J
co
^
O
_J
_J
<£.
0
10
100 1,000
HEAT INPUT, 106 Btu/h
10,000
50,000
Reference Figure 1-4.
-------
CD
l.OOOr-
.500
CO
in
o
.—I
JD
OO
z:
o
»—t
oo
oo
CO
<£
10
100 1,000
HEAT INPUT, 106 Btu/h
10,000
50,000
Reference Figure 1-5.
-------
00
to
O
to
z
O
M K
H CO
vo i— <
CQ
<:
o
100 1,000
HEAT INPUT, 106 Btu/h
10,000
50,000
Reference Figure 1-6.
-------
to
o
10
100 1,000
HEAT INPUT, 106 Btu/h
10,000
50,000
Reference Figure 1-7.
-------
.000,
fo
100 1,000
HEAT INPUT, 106 Btu/h
Reference Figure 1-8.
10,000
50,000
-------
K)
NJ
l.OOOr
.500
CO
u>
CD
i-H
-d
Vl
I/O
z
o
.100
.050
it!
CO
o
I
_l
-------
.1,
NJ
(jj
-l->
CQ
-------
4->
CQ
u>
o
,—I
-Q
fN
I/O
O
CQ
O
_J
_l
-------
.OOOr-r
Un £
.001
0
10
100 1,000
HEAT INPUT, 106 Btu/h
10,000
50,000
Reference Figure 1-12.
-------
.OOOrT-rr
I '-r
,500-i
=3
CQ
ID
o
I—t
jQ
*>
t/>
CQ
O
_l
_l
et
10
100 1,000
HEAT INPUT, 106 Btu/h
Reference Figure 1-13.
10,000
50,000
-------
1
to
CO
-------
1.000,
00
.500
CO
ID
CD
00
•z.
o
»— i
01
CO
co
3
O
_l
_J
«=c
10
100 1,000
HEAT INPUT, 106 Btu/h
Reference Figure 1-15.
10,000
50,000
-------
.1.000™
NJ
VO
CD
ti>
o
I—I
-Q
n
co
z
o
i—i
co
co
CQ
«t
O
.001
10
100 1,000
HEAT INPUT, 106 Btu/h
10,000
50,000
Reference Figure 1-16.
-------
1.000
,500 :
CQ
-------
.001
10
100 1,000
HEAT INPUT, 106 Btu/h
10,000
50,000
Reference Figure 1-18.
-------
l.OOOr-
.500
CO
u>
o
1 — I
jQ
r>
C/1
z:
o
u>
co
3
O
_l
_J
•a:
10
100 1,000
HEAT INPUT, 106 Btu/h
Reference Figure 1-19.
10,000
50,000
-------
u>
U)
3
CO
u>
O
t—I
_o
to
O
>—I
to
to
»—I
s:
LU
UU
CO
3
O
_1
_J
«c
10
100 1,000
HEAT INPUT, 106 Btu/h
10,000
50,000
Reference Figure 1-20.
-------
10
100 1,000
HEAT INPUT, 106 Btu/h
10,000
50,000
Reference Figure 1-21.
-------
to
1.000
.500
4->
00
u>
O
to
z
O
to
to
UJ
_J
co
,100
.050
10
100 1,000
HEAT INPUT, 106 Btu/h
Reference Figure 1-22.
10,000
50,000
-------
l.OOOr-rrTTT
.500
CQ
l£>
o
I—I
JD
*\
§
•—<
<^
t/o
CO
-------
OQ
u>
O
co
-j
o
»—4
to
UJ
_l
CO
•=£.
10
100 1,000
HEAT INPUT, 106 Btu/h
10,000
50,000
Reference Figure 1-24.
-------
1.000:
00
CO
to
o
1—I
JQ
OO
O
I—I
OO
oo
CO
o
_1
_l
-------
l.OOOr-rrT
u»
VD
3
co
u>
o
.—I
-Q
r
CO
o
I—I
CO
co
co
O
_J
_I
•=c
10
100 1,000
HEAT INPUT, 106 Btu/h
10,000
50,000
Reference Figure 1-26.
-------
l.OOOr-T
.500
CO
ID
o
i—i
-O
ft
GO
O
f—«
CO
GO
CD
3
O
_l
_J
•=£
10
100 1,000
HEAT INPUT, 106 Btu/h
Reference Figure 1-27.
10,000
50,000
-------
4J
OQ
co
z
o
to
to
CO
•a:
0
10
100 1,000
HEAT INPUT, 10s Btu/h
10,000
50,000
Reference Figure 1-28.
-------
K)
l.OOOr-r-,
.500!-^
CO
to
o
,—I
_o
r
oo
^
o
I—I
oo
oo
<:
o
,100
.050
.010
.005
.001
It
II
i
i i
11
_L.J
ill
M
I
II
it
.Hi
ill
il
I
HI
ffl
t
r
lU
i
ftt
Ill
\A
«
JlJJ:
l!
ill;
•Jffl
lii-
it
•Jl
ffi
TTTT
Tit
rfi
l ! I i
t!H
i u
111
H-i
411
10
100 1,000
HEAT INPUT, 106 Btu/h
10,000
50,000
Reference Figure 1-29.
-------
l.OOOr-r
.500
CO
to
O
,100
- .050
I/O
•z.
O
to
to
CO
-------
10
100 1,000
HEAT INPUT, 106 Btu/h
10,000
50,000
Reference Figure 1-31.
-------
1.000
Ul
CO
U3
O
i—I
-Q
r
oo
O
to
CQ
O
I
_J
«a:
10
100 1,000
HEAT INPUT, 106 Btu/h
10,000
50,000
Reference Figure 1-32.
-------
10
100 1,000
HEAT INPUT, 106 Btu/h
Reference Figure 1-33.
10,000
50,000
-------
-M
OQ
u>
O
CO
Z
O
co
to
CD
-------
CD
1.000,
.500-
CQ
u>
O
i—i
JO
r
co
•z.
O
>—<
oo
CO
CO
3
O
_J
_l
-------
•000|Tin
co
u>
O
i— I
_O
t/J
CO
UJ
UJ
_1
CQ
O
_1
_J
-------
Ul
o
0
10
100 1,000
HEAT INPUT, 106 Btu/h
10,000
50,000
Reference Figure 1-37.
-------
CD
to
O
i—I
JQ
to
O
i—i
i—i
SI
UJ
UJ
_J
CO
O
_J
«=C
0
10
100 1,000
HEAT INPUT, 106 Btu/h
10,000
50,000
Reference Figure 1-38.
-------
1.000,
Ul
.500-44-
CO
us
o
r—I
JO
f\
CO
2:
o
t—I
to
1/1
CQ
O
_J
_J
eC
10
100 1,000
HEAT INPUT, 106 Btu/h
10,000
50,000
Reference Figure 1-39.
-------
l.OOOr
en
10
CO
u>
O
I—I
_a
•t
co
O
I—I
co
co
ca
o
_i
_i
•=c
.010
.005
.001
10
100 1,000
HEAT INPUT, 106 Btu/h
10,000
50,000
Reference Figure 1-40.
-------
10
100 1,000
HEAT INPUT, 106 Btu/h
10,000
50,000
Reference Figure 1-41.
-------
1.000
01
+J
00
o
1— I
_Q
A
oo
co
o
_i
_i
«c
100 1,000
HEAT INPUT, 106 Btu/h
10,000
50,000
Reference Figure 1-42.
-------
1.000
0.500
M-
O
in
°> 0.100
ft
g 0.050
i—i
oo
t—I
2:
LU
LU
g 0.010
o
-J 0.005
0.001
10'
10" 105
FLOW RATE, cfm
Reference Figure 2-1,
106
107
156
-------
a
2
3
a
«o
o
z
o
1.5
1.0
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
1' '|''"I'' '|'"
\\\\
UM GIOUMD UVU DUS1 CO*«CINTI*riOM
£ 1OO wf —J »OI 3-11 mio
* ia »•• mi »oi ae •*••« • i *M
£ IT.* mJ !•* S« hr»
- 0.3
0.2
D
u
H
a
<
a.
• All*
1 »U»1T*MVIALIT »L*f TIIIAIM
1. ix O' MIAT IM^UI v» SIACK &s tiMSiA^i i
3 STACK MtlGMT tS »Mf itCAl i**C« MUCMT
«. C«*»M tl »OI • JIMCkl STACK
0.1
i i 11 t i I I i i i i
510 50 100 500 1,000 5,000 10,000
TOTAL EQUIPMENT CAPACITY RATING, TO6 Btu/hr INPUT
ASME STANDARD, APS-1
Reference Figure 3-1.
157
-------
5 10 50 100 500 1,000 5,000 10,000
TOTAL EQUIPMENT CAPACITY RATING, TO6 Btu/hr INPUT
ASME STANDARD, APS-1
Reference Figure 3-2.
158
-------
S tOO «•• "^ POt
« »ft *>«• -O IOI 1C «M I hr
5 10 50 100 500 1,000 5,000 10,000
TOTAL EQUIPMENT CAPACITY RATING, 106 Btu/hr INPUT
ASME STANDARD, APS-1
Reference Figure 3-3.
159
-------
Q.
2
o
o
z
g
—
s
< 0.2-
u
H
ce
<
a.
^ 100 ttt ™J 'Of 3-11 •*•«
SO »f MA POt 30 •••« I
IT i«« *i (». 34 >w.
1 5 10 50 100 500 1,000 5,000 10,000
TOTAL EQUIPMENT CAPACITY RATING, 106 Btu/hr INPUT
ASME STANDARD, APS-1
Reference Figure 3-4.
160
-------
5 10 SO 100 500 1,000 5,000 10,000
TOTAL EQUIPMENT CAPACITY RATING, 106 Btu/hr INPUT
ASME STANDARD, APS-1
Reference Figure 3-5.
161
-------
1.000
g. 0.500
O
O
O
^ 0.100
-Q 0.050
r—
«\
oo
O
I—I
I/O
oo
£ 0.010
CO
O
1
_l
=£
0.005
0.001
10 100 1000 10,000
STEAM CAPACITY RATING, 1000 1 bs of steam/h
Reference Figure 4-1.
100,000
162
-------
IO
en
o
X)
o
o
o
10
co
z
o
oo
CO
OQ
I
<
1.000
0.500
0.100
0.050
s 0.010
0.005
0.001
10 100 1000 10,000
STEAM CAPACITY RATING, 1000 Ibs of steam/h
Reference Figure 4-2.
100,000
163
-------
l/l
.Q
1.000
S 0.500
§
0 0.100
£ 0.050
oo
z:
o
oo
I/O
UJ
LU
_1
CO
<:
o
0.010
0.005
0.001
10 100 1000 10,000
STEAM CAPACITY RATING, 1000 Ibs of steam/h
Reference Figure 4-3.
100,000
164
-------
1000.0
500.0
Ul
CO
o
I—I
CO
co
h—I
Ul
Ul
_l
CO
-------
1000.0
500.0
-rtii
(Ti
100.0
2 50.0
oo
oo
CO
o
_l
< 10.0
5.0
1.0
rin
. .11
4-
j r I
-I i '-
-1-14
fll
! !l
W4H
III
Ml
I
iWli
1
ill
.UiiL
ill
i
mlf
i < i
ttit
.L
4XTL-U::
ISK
Ji
L,
>r
i
i!1
liii
-U!
i
ill]
L-Ul
-•f
j.i
IL
or
u
ijj^
§• i
L
11.
I
uiuiii
II:
LiU
-tt
llU
II
]-
iii:
pri-frr
ill! '•
.11
i i i
it
nt
-M
il
(Mlii
iiljlii
ill,
Jur;
il
t
"t
!. .U.
in1!
mj
ilk
1M
rh
in
Jill
n
10
100 1000
HEAT INPUT, 10" Btu/h
Reference Figure 5-2.
10,000
100,000
-------
500
100
co
z
o
CO
CO
50 —
10" 105
STACK EFFLUENT FLOW RATE, acfm.
Reference Figure 6-1.
106
167
-------
1000
o
«t
I—
00
100
Q
DC
Q
c£
I—
1/1
10
1014 105
STACK EFFLUENT FLOW RATE, acfm
10E
Reference Figure 6-2.
168
-------
1000
500
to
to
LlJ
UJ
_l
CO
-------
APPENDIX B
CONVERSION FACTORS
170
-------
Multiply
Btu/hr input
send cu ft/sec
stnd cu ft/min
grams/sq m
grams/sq m/day
grains/stnd cu ft
grains/stnd cu ft
grains/stnd cu ft
grains/send cu ft
(adjusted to 50%
excess air)
grams/stnd cu m
grams of gas/stnd
cu m
megawatts of steam*
generated
electricity
micrograms of gas/send
cu m
milligrams of gas/stnd
cu m
milligrams/send cu m
ppm by vol
ppro by vol
.ppm by vol
ppm by vol
percent by vol
pounds of gas/hr
pounds of gas/hr
pounds/1000 Ib gas*
APPENDIX B
CONVERSION FACTORS
JBy
10"
mol wt x 9.3
tool wt x 0.155
2.85
86.5
1.89
2300
2.30
2.20
0.435
24.2 x lOVmol wt
10T
0.0242/raol wt
24.2/mol wt
4.35 x 10"4
mol wt x 41.3 x 10"
mol wt x 0.0413
mol wt x 41.3
104
6.48/mol wt
0.108/mol wt
0.53
To Get
Megawatts of steaiz."
generated elec-
/ teicity (approx.)
pounds of gas/hr
pounds of gas/hr
short tons/sq mi
short tons/sq mi/mo
pounds/1000 Ib gas*
milligrams/stnd cu m
grams/stnd cu m
pounds/10* Btu input
. grains/stnd cu ft
ppm by vol
Btu/hr input (appro*.)
ppm by vol
ppm by vol
grains/stnd cu ft
grams of gas/stnd
cu m
milligrams of gas/stnd
cu m
micrograms of gas/stnd
cu m
percent by vol
ppm by vol
stnd cu ft/min
stnd cu ft/sec
grains/stnd cu ft
171
-------
Multiply
pounds/1000 Ib gas* 1.18
(adjusted to 50%
excess mlr)
pounds/10* Bru input 0.45
pounds/10* Btu input 0.85
short tons/sq mi 0.35
short tons/sq mi/mo 0.0116
To Get
pounds/10* Ecu input
grains/stnd cu ft
(adjusted to 50%
excess ait)
pounds/1000 Ib gas*
(adjusted to 50%
excess air)
grams/sq m
grams/sq m/day
• DO! wt «= 29
• - Bctcr
•el wt= o>oltcul«r w*ijhl
•tod* (Undatd it 70 T mnd «tmo»pheiie prcmiur*
172
-------
APPENDIX C
METHOD 5--DETERMINATION OF PARTICULATE
EMISSIONS FROM STATIONARY SOURCES
173
-------
APPENDIX C
METHOD 5—DETERMINATION OF PARTICULATE
EMISSIONS FROM STATIONARY SOURCES
1. Principle and Appl icabi 1 ity
' 1.1 Principle. Participate matter is withdrawn isokinetically
from the source and collected on a glass fiber filter maintained at
a temperature in the range of 120 +_ 14°C (248 +_25°F) or such other
temperature as specified by an applicable subpart of the standards
or approved by the Administrator, U. S. Environmental Protection
Agency, for a particular application. The particulate mass, which
includes any material that condenses at or above the filtration
temperature, is determined gravimetrically after removal of uncombined
water.
1.2 Applicability. This method is applicable for the determina-
tion of particulate emissions from stationary sources.
2. Apparatus
2.1 Sampling Train. A schematic of the sampling train used in
this method is shown in Figure 5-1. Complete construction details
are given in APTD-0581 (Citation 2 in Section 7); commercial models
of this train are also available. For changes from APTD-0581 and
for allowable modifications of the-train shown in Figure 5-1, see
the following subsections.
The operating and maintenance procedures for the sampling train
are described in APTD-0576 (Citation 3 in Section 7). Since correct
usage is important in obtaining valid results, all users should read
APTD-0576 and adopt the operating and maintenance procedures 'outlined
in it, unless otherwise specified herein. The sampling train consists
of the following components:
174
-------
2.1.1 Probe Nozzle. Stainless steel (316) or glass with sharp,
tapered leading edge. The angle of taper shall be <30° and the
taper shall be on the outside to preserve a constant internal diameter.
The probe nozzle shall be;of the button-hook or elbow design, unless
otherwise specified by the Administrator. If made of stainless steel,
the nozzle shall be constructed from seamless tubing; other materials
of construction may be used, subject to the approval of the
Administrator.
A range of nozzle sizes suitable for isokinetic sampling should
be available, e.g., 0.32 to 1.27 cm (1/8 to 1/2 in.)--or larger if
higher volume sampling trains are used—inside diameter (ID) nozzles
in increments of 0.16 cm (1/16 in.). Each nozzle shall be calibrated
according to the procedures outlined in Section 5.
2.1.2 Probe Liner. Borosilicate or quartz glass tubing with a
heating system capable of maintaining a gas temperature at the exit
end during sampling of 120 +_ 14°C (248 +_ 25°F), or such other tempera-
ture as specified by an applicable subpart of the standards or
approved by the Administrator for a particular application. (The
tester may opt to operate the equipment at a temperature lower than
that specified.) Since the actual temperature at the outlet of the
probe is not usually monitored during sampling, probes constructed
according to APTD-0581 and utilizing the calibration curves of
APTD-0576 (or calibrated according to the procedure outlined in
APTD-0576) will be considered acceptable.
175
-------
(Ti
cc
TEMPERATURE SENSOR
.. PROBE
TEMPERATURE
SENSOR
IMPINGER TRAIN OPTIONAL,MAY BE REPLACED
BY AN EQUIVALENT CONDENSER
HEATED AREA THERMOMETER
THERMOMETER
PITOTTUBE
PROBE
REVERSE-TYPE
PITOTTUBE
IMPINGERS ICE BATH
BY-PASS VALVE
VACUUM
GAUGE
THERMOMETERS
MAIN VALVE
DRY GAS METER
AIRTIGHT
PUMP
CHECK
VALVE
•VACUUM
LINE
Fjyure 51. Parliculalc-sampling tr;iin.
-------
Either borosilicate or quartz glass probe liners may be used
for stack temperatures up to about 480°C (900°F); quartz liners
shall be used for temperatures between 480 and 900°C (900 and 1650°F).
Both types of liners may be. used at higher temperatures than specified
for short periods of time, subject to the approval of the Administrator.
The softening temperature for borosilicate is 820°C (1508°F), and for
quartz it is 1500°C (2732°F).
Whenever practical, every effort should be made to use borosilicate
or quartz glass probe liners. Alternatively, metal liners (e.g., 316
stainless steel, Incoloy 825, or other corrosion resistant metals)
made of seamless tubing may be used, subject to the approval of the
Administrator.
2.1.3 Pitot Tube. Type S, as described in Section 2.1 of
Method 2, or other device approved by the Administrator. The pi tot
tube shall be attached to the probe (as shown in Figure 5-1) to allow
constant monitoring of the stack gas velocity. The impact (high
pressure) opening plane of the pitot tube shall be even with or
above the nozzle entry plane (see Method 2, Figure 2-6b) during
sampling. The Type S pitot tube assembly shall have a known coefficient,
determined as outlined in Section 4 of Method 2.
2.1.4 Differential Pressure Gauge. Inclined manometer or
equivalent device (two), as described in Section 2.2 of Method 2.
One manometer shall be used for velocity head Up) readings, and
the other, for orifice differential pressure readings.
Mention of trade names or specific products does not constitute
endorsement by the Environmental Protection Agency.
177
-------
2.1.5 Filter Holder. Borosllicate glass, with a glass frit
filter support and a silicone rubber gasket. Other materials of
construction (e.g., stainless steel, Teflon, Viton) may be used,
subject to the approval of the Administrator. The holder design shall
provide a positive seal against leakage from the outside or around the
filter. The holder shall be attached immediately at the outlet of
the probe (or cyclone, if used).
2.1.6 Filter Heating System. Any heating system capable of
maintaining a temperature around the filter holder during sampling
of 120 +; 14°C (248 + 25°F), or such other temperature as specified by
an applicable subpart of the standards or approved by the
Administrator for a particular application. Alternatively, the tester
/
may opt to operate the equipment at a temperature lower than that
specified. A temperature gauge capable of measuring temperature to
within 3°C (5.4°F) shall be installed so that the temperature around
the filter holder can be regulated and monitored during sampling.
Heating systems other than the one shown in APTD-0581 may be used.
2.1.7 Condenser. The following system shall be used to determine
the stack gas moisture content: Four impingers connected in series
with leak-free ground glass fittings or any similar leak-free non-
contaminating fittings. The first, third, and fourth impingers shall
be of the Greenburg-Smith design, modified by replacing the tip with
a 1.3 cm (1/2 in.) ID glass tube extending to about 1.3 cm (1/2 in.)
from the bottom of the flask. The second impinger shall be of the
Greenburg-Smith design with the standard tip. Modifications (e.g.,
178
-------
using flexible connections between the Impingers, using materials
other than glass, or using flexible vacuum lines to connect the
filter holder to the condenser) may be used, subject to the
approval of the Administrator. The first and second impingers shall
contain known quantities of water (Section 4.1.3), the third shall
be empty, and the fourth shall contain a known weight of silica gel,
or equivalent desiccant. A thermometer, capable of measuring tempera-
ture to within 1°C (2°F) shall be placed at the outlet of the fourth
impinger for monitoring purposes.
Alternatively, any system that cools the sample gas stream and
allows measurement of the water condensed and moisture leaving the
condenser, each to within 1 ml or 1 g may be used, subject to the
approval of the Administrator. Acceptable means are to measure the
condensed water either gravimetrically or volumetrically and to measure
the moisture leaving the condenser by: (1) monitoring the temperature
and pressure at the exit of the condenser and using Dal ton's law of
partial pressures; or (2) passing the sample gas stream through a
tared silica gel (or equivalent desiccant) trap with exit gases kept
below 20°C (68°F) and determining the weight gain.
.If means other than silica gel are used to determine the amount of
moisture leaving the condenser, it is recommended that silica gel (or
equivalent) still be used between the condenser system and pump to
prevent moisture condensation in the pump and metering devices and
to avoid the need to make corrections for moisture in the metered
volume.
179
-------
Note: If a determination of the participate matter collected
in the impingers is desired in addition to moisture content, the
impinger system described above shall be used, without.modification.
Individual States or control agencies requiring this information
shall be contacted as to the sample recovery and analysis of the
impinger contents.
2.1.8 Metering System. Vacuum gauge, leak-free pump, thermometers
capable of measuring temperature to within 3°C (5.4°F), dry gas meter
capable of measuring volume to within 2 percent, and related equipment,
as shown in Figure 5-1. Other metering systems capable of maintaining
sampling rates within 10 percent of isokinetic and of determining
sample volumes to within 2 percent may be used, subject to the approval
of the Administrator. When the metering system is used in conjunction
with a pitot tube, the system shall enable checks of isokinetic rates.
Sampling trains utilizing metering systems designed for higher
flow rates than that described in APTD-058T or APTD-0576 may be used
provided that the specifications of this method are met.
2.1.9 Barometer. Mercury, aneroid, or other barometer capable
of measuring atmospheric pressure to within 2.5 mm Hg (0.1 in. Hg).
In many cases, the barometric reading may be obtained from a nearby
national weather service station, in which case the station value
(which is the absolute barometric pressure) shall be requested and
an adjustment for elevation differences between the weather station
and sampling point shall be applied at a rate of minus 2.5 mm Hg
(0.1 in. Hg) per 30 m (100 ft) elevation increase or vice versa
for elevation decrease.
180
-------
2.1.10 Gas Density Determination Equipment. Temperature
sensor and pressure gauge, as described in Sections 2.3 and 2.4 of
Method 2, and gas analyzer, if necessary, as described-in Method 3.
The temperature sensor shall, preferably, be permanently attached
to the pi tot tube or sampling probe in a fixed configuration, such
that the tip of the sensor extends beyond the leading edge of the
probe sheath and does not touch any metal. Alternatively, the sensor
may be attched just prior to use in the field. Note, however, that
if the temperature sensor is attached in the field, the sensor must
be placed in an interference-free arrangement with respect to the
Type S pitot tube openings (see Method 2, Figure 2-7). As a second
alternative, if a difference of not more than 1 percent in the average
velocity measurement is to be introduced, the temperature gauge need
not be attached to the probe or pitot tube. (This alternative is
subject to the approval of the Administrator.)
2.2 Sample Recovery. The following items are needed:
2.2.1 Probe-Liner and Probe-Nozzle Brushes. Nylon bristle
brushes with stainless steel wire handles. The probe brush shall
have extensions (at least as long as the probe) of stainless steel,
Nylon, Teflon, or similarly inert material. The brushes shall be
properly sized and shaped to brush out the probe liner and nozzle.
2.2.2 Wash Bottles—Two. Glass wash bottles are recommended;
polyethylene wash bottles may be used at the option of the tester.
It is recommended that acetone not be stored in polyethylene bottles
for longer than a month.
181
-------
2.2.3 Glass Sample Storage Containers. Chemically resistant,
borosilicate glass bottles, for acetone washes, 500 ml or 1000 ml.
Screw cap liners shall either be rubber-backed Teflon or shall be
constructed so as to be leak-free and resistant to chemical attack
by acetone. (Narrow mouth glass bottles have been found to be less
prone to leakage.) Alternatively, polyethylene bottles may be used.
2.2.4 Petri Dishes. For filter samples, glass or polyethylene,
unless otherwise specified by the Administrator.
2.2.5 Graduated Cylinder and/or Balance. To measure condensed
water to within 1 ml or 1 g. Graduated cylinders shall have sub-
divisions no greater than 2 ml. Most laboratory balances are capable
of weighing to the nearest 0.5 g or less. Any of these balances is
suitable for use here and in Section 2.3.4.
2.2.6 Plastic Storage Containers. Air-tight containers to
store silica gel.
2.2.7 Funnel and Rubber Policeman. To aid in transfer of silica
gel to container; not necessary if silica gel is weighed in the field.
2.2.8 Funnel. Glass or polyethylene, to aid in sample recovery.
2.3 Analysis. For analysis, the following equipment is needed:
2.3.. 1 Glass Weighing Dishes.'
2.3.2 Desiccator.
2.3.3 Analytical Balance. To measure to within 0.1 mg.
2.3.4 Balance. To measure to within 0.5 g.
2.3.5 Beakers. 250 ml.
2.3.6 Hygrometer. To measure the relative humidity of the
laboratory environment.
182
-------
2.3.7 Temperature Gauge. To measure the temperature of the
laboratory environment.
3. Reagents
3.1 Sampling. The reagents used in sampling are as follows:
3.1.1 Filters. Glass fiber filters, without organic binder,
exhibiting at least 99.95 percent efficiency (<0.05 percent penetration)
on 0.3-micron dioctyl phthalate smoke particles. The filter efficiency
test shall be conducted in accordance with ASTM standard method
D 2986-71. Test data from the supplier's quality control program are
sufficient for this purpose.
3.1.2 Silica Gel. Indicating! type, 6 to 16 mesh. If previously
used, dry at 175°C (350°F) for 2 hours. New, silica gel may be used
as received. Alternatively, other types of desiccants (equivalent or
better) may be used, subject to the approval of the Administrator.
3.1.3 Water. When analysis of the material caught in the
impinger? is required, distilled water shall be used. Run blanks
prior to field use to eliminate a high blank on test samples.
3.1.4 Crushed Ice.
3.1.5 Stopcock Grease. Acetone-insoluble, heat-stable silicone
grease. This is not necessary if screw-on connectors with Teflon
sleeves, or similar, are used. Alternatively, other types of stopcock
grease may be used, subject to the approval of the Administrator.
3.2 Sample Recovery. Acetone—reagent grade, <0.001 percent
residue, in glass bottles—is required. Acetone from metal containers
generally has a high residue blank and should not be used. Sometimes,
183
-------
suppliers transfer acetone to glass bottles from metal containers;
thus, acetone blanks shall be run prior to field use and only
acetone with low blank values- (<0.001 percent) shall be used. In
no case shall a blank value of greater than 0.001 percent of the
weight of acetone used be subtracted from the sample weight.
3.3 Analysis. Two reagents are required for the analysis:
3.3.1 Acetone. Same as 3.2.
3.3.2 Desiccant. Anhydrous calcium sulfate, indicating type.
Alternatively, other types of desiccants may be used, subject to the
approval of the Administrator.
4. Procedure
4.1 Sampling. The complexity of this method is such that, in
order to obtain reliable results, testers should be trained and
experienced with the test procedures.
4.1.1 Pretest Preparation. All the components shall be maintained
and calibrated according to the procedure described in APTD-0576, unless
otherwise specified herein.
Weigh several 200 to 300 g portions of silica gel in air-tight
containers to the nearest 0.5 g. Record the total weight of the
silica gel plus container, on each container. As an alternative, the
silica gel need not be preweighed, but may be weighed directly in its
impinger or sampling holder just prior to train assembly.
Check filters visually against light for irregularities and
flaws or pinhole leaks. Label filters of the proper diameter on the
back side near the edge using numbering machine ink. As an alternative,
184
-------
label the shipping containers (glass or plastic petri dishes) and
keep the filters in these containers at all times except during
sampling and weighing....
Desiccate the filters at 20 +_ 5.6eC (68 + 10°F) and ambient
pressure for at least 24 hours and weigh at intervals of at least
6 hours to a constant weight, i.e., <0.5 mg change from previous
weighing; record results to the nearest 0.1 mg. During each
weighing the filter must not be exposed to the laboratory atmosphere
for a period greater than 2 minutes and a relative humidity above
50 percent. Alternatively (unless otherwise specified by the
Administrator), the filters may be oven dried at 105°C (220°F) for
2 to 3 hours, desiccated for 2 hours, and weighed. Procedures other
than those described, which account for relative humidity effects,
may be used, subject to the approval of the Administrator.
4.1.2 Preliminary Determinations. Select the sampling site and
the minimum number of sampling points, according to Method 1 or as
specified by the Administrator. Determine the stack pressure,
temperature, and the range of velocity heads using Method 2; it is
recommended that a leak-check of the pitot lines (see Method 2,
Section 3.1) be performed. Determine the moisture content using
Approximation Method 4 or its alternatives for the purpose of making
isokinetic sampling rate settings. Determine the stack gas dry
molecular weight, as described in Method 2, Section 3.6; if integrated
Method 3 sampling is used for molecular weight determination, the
integrated bag sample shall be taken simultaneously with, and for
the same total length of time as, the particulate sample run.
185
-------
Select a nozzle size based on the range of velocity heads, such
that it is not necessary to change the nozzle size in order to maintain
isokinetic sampling rates. During the run, do not change the nozzle
size. Ensure that the proper differential pressure gauge is chosen for
the range of velocity heads encountered (see Section 2.2 of Method 2).
Select a suitable probe liner and probe length such that all
traverse points can be sampled. For large stacks, consider sampling
from opposite sides of the stack to reduce the length of probes.
Select a total sampling time greater than or equal to the minimum
total sampling time specified in the test procedures for the specific
industry such that (1) the sampling time per point is not less than 2
min, (or some greater time interval as specified by the Administrator),
and (2) the sample volume taken (corrected to standard conditions) will
exceed the required minimum total gas sample volume. The latter is
based on an approximate average sampling rate.
The sampling time at each point shall be the same. It is recom-
mended that the number of minutes sampled at each point be an integer or
an integer plus onehalf minute, in order to avoid timekeeping errors.
In some circumstances, e.g., batch cycles, it may be necessary to
sample for shorter times at the traverse points and to obtain smaller
gas sample volumes. In these cases, the Administrator's approval must
first be obtained.
4.1.3 Preparation of Collection Train. During preparation and
assembly of the sampling train, keep all openings where contamination
186
-------
can occur covered until just prior to assembly or until sampling
is about to begin.
Place 100 ml of water in each of the first two impingers, leave
the third impinger empty, and transfer approximately 200 to 300 g of
preweighed silica gel from its container to the fourth impinger.
More silica gel may be used, but care should be taken to ensure that.
it is not entrained and carried out from the impinger during sampling.
Place the container in a clean place for later use in the sample
recovery. Alternatively, the weight of the silica gel plus impinger
may be determined to the nearest 0.5 g and recorded.
Using a tweezer or clean disposable surgical gloves, place a
labeled (identified) and weighed filter in the filter holder. Be sure
that the filter is properly centered and the gasket properly placed
so as to prevent the sample gas stream from circumventing the filter.
Check the filter for tears after assembly is completed.
When glass liners are used, install the selected nozzle us'ing
a Viton A 0-ring when stack temperatures are less than 260°C (500°F)
and an asbestos string gasket when temperatures are higher. See
APTD-0576 for details. Other connecting systems using either 316
stainless steel or Teflon ferrules may be used. When metal liners
are used, install the nozzle as above or by a leak-free direct
mechanical connection. Mark the probe with heat resistant tape or
by some other method to denote the proper distance into the stack or
duct for each sampling point.
187
-------
Set up the train as in Figure 5-1, using (if necessary) a very
light coat of silicone grease on all ground glass joints, greasing
only the outer portion (see APTD-0576) to avoid possibility of
contamination by the silicone grease. Subject to the approval of
the Administrator, a glass cyclone may be used between the probe and
filter holder when the total particulate catch is expected to exceed
100 mg or when water droplets are present in the stack gas.
Place crushed ice around the impingers.
4.1.4 Leak-Check Procedures.
4.1.4.1 Pretest Leak-Check. A pretest leak-check is recommended,
but not required. If the tester opts to conduct the pretest leak-check,
the following procedure shall be used.
After the sampling train has been assembled, turn on and set the
filter and probe heating systems at the desired operating temperatures.
Allow time for the temperatures to stabilize. If a Viton A 0-ring or
other leak-free connection is used in assembling the probe nozzle to
the probe liner, leak-check the train at the sampling site by plugging
the nozzle and pulling a 380 mm Hg (15 in. Hg) vacuum.
Note: A lower vacuum may be 'used, provided that it is not exceeded
during the test.
If an asbestos string is used, do not connect the probe to the
train during the leak-check. Instead, leak-check the train by first
plugging the inlet to the filter holder (cyclone, if applicable) and
pulling a 380 mm Hg (15 in. Hg) vacuum (see Note immediately above).
Then connect the probe to the train and leak-check at about 25 mm Hg
(1 in. Hg) vacuum; alternatively, the probe may be leak-checked with
188
-------
the rest of the sampling train, in one step, at 380 mm Hg (15 in. Hg)
vacuum. Leakage rates in excess of 4 percent of the average sampling
rate or 0.00057 m3/min (0.02 cfm), whichever is less, are unacceptable.
The following leak-check instructions for the sampling train
described in APTD-0576 and APTD-0581 may be helpful. Start the pump
with bypass valve fully open and coarse adjust valve completely closed.
Partially open the coarse adjust valve and slowly close the bypass
valve until the desired vacuum is reached. Do not reverse direction
of bypass valve; this will cause water to back up into the filter
holder. If the desired vacuum is exceeded, either leak-check at
this higher vacuum or end the leak check as shown below and start over.
When the leak-check is completed, first slowly remove the plug
from the inlet to the probe, filter holder, or cyclone (if applicable)
and immediately turn off the vacuum pump. This prevents the water in
the impingers from being forced backward into the filter holder and
silica gel from being entrained backward, into the third impinger.
4.1.4.2 Leak-Checks During Sample Run. If, during the sampling
run, a component (e.g., filter assembly or impinger) change becomes
necessary, a leak-check shall be conducted immediately before the
change is made. The leak-check'shall be done according to the procedure
outlined in Section 4.1.4.1 above, except that it shall be done at a
vacuum equal to or greater than the maximum value recorded up to that
point in the test. If the leakage rate is found to be no greater than
0.00057 m /min (0.02 cfm) or 4 percent of the average sampling rate
189
-------
(whichever is less), the results are acceptable, and no correction
will need to be applied to the total volume of dry gas metered;
if, however, a higher leakage rate is obtained, the tester shall
either record the leakage rate and plan to correct the sample volume
as shown in Section 6.3 of this method, or shall void the sampling run.
Immediately after component changes, leak-checks are optional;
if such leak-checks are done, the procedure outlined in Section 4.1.4.1
above shall be used.
4.1.4.3 Post-test Leak-Check. A leak-check is mandatory at the
conclusion of each sampling run. The leak-check shall be done in
accordance with the procedures outlined in Section 4.1.4.1, except
that it shall be conducted at a vacuum equal to or greater than the
maximum value reached during the sampling run. If the leakage rate
is found to be no greater than 0.00057 m /min (0.02 cfm) or 4 percent
of the average sampling rate (whichever is less), the results are
acceptable, and no correction need be applied to the total volume of
dry gas metered. If, however, a higher leakage rate is obtained, the
tester shall either record the leakage rate and correct the sample
volume as shown in Section 6.3 of this method, or shall void the
sampling run.
4.1.5 Particulate Train Operation. During the sampling run,
maintain an isokinetic sampling rate (within 10 percent of true
isokinetic unless otherwise specified by the Administrator) and a
temperature around the filter of 120 + 14°C (248 + 25°F), or such other
190
-------
temperature as specified by an applicable subpart of the standards
or approved by the Administrator.
For each run, record the data required on a data sheet such as
the one shown in Figure 5-2. Be sure to record the initial dry gas
meter reading. Record the dry gas meter readings at the beginning
and end of each sampling time increment, when changes In flow rates
are made, before and after each leak check, and when sampling is halted.
Take other readings required by Figure 5-2 at least once at each sample
point during each time increment and additional readings when significant
changes (20 percent variation in velocity head readings) necessitate
additional adjustments in flow rate. Level and zero the manometer.
Because the manometer level and zero may drift due to vibrations and
temperature changes, make periodic checks during the traverse.
Clean the portholes prior to the test run to minimize the chance
of sampling deposited material. To begin sampling, remove the nozzle
cap, verify that the filter and probe heating systems are up to
temperature, and that the pitot tube and -probe are properly positioned.
Position the nozzle at the first traverse point with the tip pointing
directly into the gas stream. Immediately start the pump and adjust
the flow to isokinetic conditions. Nomographs are available, which
aid in the rapid adjustment of the isokinetic sampling rate without
excessive computations. These nomographs are designed for use when the
Type S pitot tube coefficient is 0.85 j^0.02, and the stack gas
equivalent density (dry molecular weight) is equal to 29 +_4. APTD-0576
details the procedure for using the nomographs. If C and M. are
outside the above stated ranges, do not use the nomographs unless
appropriate steps (see Citation 7 in Section 7) are taken to compensate
for the deviations.
191
-------
PLANT
LOCATION.
OPERATOR.
DATE
RUN NO
SAMPLE BOX NO..
METER BOX N0._
METERAH@
C FACTOR
AMBIENT TEMPERATURE
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE .
ASSUMED MOISTURE. % _
PROBE LENGTH,m III)
NOZZLE IDENTIFICATION NO..
AVERAGE CALIBRATED NOZZLE DIAMETER, ctndn.]
PRODE HEATER SETTING
LEAK RATE. m3/mm.(clm)
PROBE LINERMATERIAL
PITOT TUBE COEFFICIENT.Cp.
SCHEMATIC OF STACK CROSS SECTION
STATIC PRESSURE, mm Hg (in.Mg)
FILTER NO.'
TRAVERSE POINT
NUMBER
TOTAL
SAMPLING
TIME
(01. mm.
AVERAGE
VACUUM
mrn Hg
(in Hg|
STACK
TEMPERATURE
• °C (°F|
VEIOCITY
HEAD
|APSI.
"»n|in |H^O
PRESSURE
DIFfERENTIAL
ACROSS
ORIFICE
METER
nvn H^O
(in H20)
GAS SAMPLE
VOLUME
m3 (Il3l
GAS SAMPLE TEMPERATURE
AT DRY GAS METER
INLET
°C ("F|
Avfj.
OUTLET
"C (°F|
Avi|.
Avq.
FILTER HOLDER
TEMPERATURE
°C |'F|
TEMPERATURE
; UF GAS
LEAVING
CONDENSER OR
LAST IMPINGER.
'C ("F)
ro
Figure 5-2. Pariiculale field data.
-------
When the stack is under significant negative pressure (height
of impinger stem), take care to close the coarse adjust valve before
inserting the probe into the stack to prevent water from backing into
the filter holder. If necessary, the pump may be turned on with the
coarse adjust valve closed.
When the probe is in position, block off the openings around
the probe and porthole to prevent unrepresentative dilution of the
gas stream.
Traverse the stack cross-section, as required by Method 1 or as
specified by the Administrator, being careful not to bump the probe
nozzle into the stack walls when sampling near the walls or when
removing or inserting the probe through the portholes; this minimizes
the chance of extracting deposited material.
During the test run, make periodic adjustments to keep the
temperature around the filter holder at the proper level; add more
ice and, if necessary, salt to maintain a temperature of less than
20°C (68°F) at the condenser/silica gel outlet. Also, periodically
check the level and zero of the manometer.
If the pressure drop across the filter becomes too high, making
isokinetic sampling difficult to maintain, the filter may be replaced
in the midst of a sample run. It is recommended that another complete
filter assembly be used rather than attempting to change the filter
itself. Before a new filter assembly is installed, conduct a leak-check
(see Section 4.1.4.2). The total particulate weight shall include the
summation of all filter assembly catches.
193
-------
A single train shall be used for the entire sample run, except
in cases where simultaneous sampling is required in two or more
separate ducts or at two or more different locations within the same
duct, or, in cases where equipment failure necessitates a change of
trains. In all other situations, the use of two or more trains will
be subject to the approval of the Administrator.
Note that when two or more trains are used, separate analyses of
the front-half and (if applicable) impinger catches from each train
shall be performed, unless identical nozzle sizes were used on all
trains, in which case, the front-half catches from the individual trains
may be combined (as may the impinger catches) and one analysis of front-
half catch and one analysis of impinger catch may be performed. Consult
with the Administrator for details concerning the calculation of
results when two or more trains are used.
At the end of the sample run, turn off the coarse adjust valve,
remove the probe and nozzle from the stack, turn off the pump, record
the final dry gas meter reading, and conduct a post-test leak-check, as
outlined in Section 4.1.4.3. Also, leak-check the pitot lines as
described in Method 2, Section 3.1; the lines must pass this leak-check,
in order to validate the velocity head data.
4.1.6 Calculation of Percent Isokinetic. Calculate percent
isokinetic (see Calculations, Section 6) to determine whether the run
was valid or another test run should be made. If there was difficulty
in maintaining isokinetic rates due to source conditions, consult with
the Administrator for possible variance on the isokinetic rates.
194
-------
4.2 Sample Recovery. Proper cleanup procedure begins as soon
as the probe is removed from the stack at the end of the sampling
period. Allow the probe to cool.
When the probe can be safely handled, wipe off all external
particulate matter near the tip of the probe nozzle and place a cap
over it to prevent losing or gaining particulate matter. Do not cap
off the probe tip tightly while the sampling train is cooling down
as this would create a vacuum in the filter holder, thus drawing water
from the impingers into the filter holder.
Before moving the sample train to the cleanup site, remove the
probe from the sample train, wipe off the silicone grease, and cap
the open outlet of the probe. Be careful not to lose any condensate
that might be present. Wipe off the silicone grease from the filter
inlet where the probe was fastened and cap it. Remove the umbilical
cord from the last impinger and cap the impinger. If a flexible line
is used between the first impinger or condenser and the filter holder,
disconnect the line at the filter holder and let any condensed water
or liquid drain into the impingers or condenser. After wiping off the
silicone grease, cap off the filter holder outlet and impinger inlet.
Either ground-glass stoppers, plastic caps, or serum caps may be used
to close these openings.
Transfer the probe and filter-impinger assembly to the cleanup
area. This area should be clean and protected from the wind so that
the chances of contaminating or losing the sample will be minimized.
195
-------
Save a portion of the acetone used for cleanup as a blank. Take
200 ml of this acetone directly from the wash bottle being used and
place it in a glass sample container labeled "acetone blank."
Inspect the train prior to and during disassembly and note any
abnormal conditions. Treat the samples as follows:
Container No. 1. Carefully remove the filter from the filter holder
and place it in its identified petri dish container. Use a pair of
tweezers and/or clean disposable surgical gloves to handle the filter.
If it is necessary to fold the filter, do so such that the particulate
cake is inside the fold. Carefully transfer to the petri dish any
particulate matter and/or filter fibers which adhere to the filter
holder gasket, by using a dry Nylon bristle brush and/or a sharp-edged
blade. Seal the container.
Container No. 2. Taking care to see that dust on the outside
of the probe or other exterior surfaces does not get into the sample,
quantitatively recover particulate matter ,or any condensate from the
probe nozzle, probe fitting, probe liner, and front half of the
filter holder by washing these components with acetone and placing
the wash in a glass container. Distilled water may be used instead
of acetone when approved by the Administrator and shall be used when
specified by the Administrator; in these cases, save a water blank
and follow the Administrator's directions on analysis. Perform the
acetone rinses as follows:
196
-------
Carefully remove the probe nozzle and clean the inside surface
by rinsing with acetone from a wash bottle and brushing with a Nylon
bristle brush. Brush until the acetone rinse shows no visible particles,
after which make a final rinse of the inside surface with acetone. .
Brush and rinse the inside parts of the Swagelok fitting with
acetone in a similar way until no visible particles remain.
Rinse the probe liner with acetone by tilting and rotating the
probe while squirting acetone into its upper end so that all inside
surfaces will be wetted with acetone. Let the acetone drain from the
lower end into the sample container. A funnel (glass or polyethylene)
may be used to aid in transferring liquid washes to the container. Follow
the acetone rinse with a probe brush. Hold the probe in an inclined
position, squirt acetone into the upper end as the probe brush is being
pushed with a twisting action through the probe; hold a sample container
underneath the lower end of the probe, and catch any acetone and particu-
late matter which is brushed from the probe. Run the brush through the
probe three times or more until no visible particulate matter is carried
out with the acetone or until none remains in the probe liner on visual
inspection. With stainless steel or other metal probes, run the brush
through in the above prescribed manner at least six times since metal
probes have small crevices in which particulate matter can be entrapped.
Rinse the brush with acetone, and quantitatively collect these washings
in the sample container. After the brushing, make a final acetone rinse
of the probe as described above.
197
-------
It is recommended that two people be used to clean the probe
to minimize sample losses. Between sampling runs, keep brushes clean
and protected from contamination.
After ensuring that all joints have been wiped clean of silicone
grease, clean the inside of the front half of the filter holder by
rubbing the surfaces with a Nylon bristle brush and rinsing with
acetone. Rinse each surface three times or more if needed to remove
visible particulate. Make a final rinse of the brush and filter
holder. Carefully rinse out the glass cyclone, also (if applicable).
After all acetone washings and particulate matter have been collected
in the sample container, tighten the lid on the sample container so
that acetone will not leak out when it is shipped to the laboratory.
Mark the height of the fluid level to determine whether or not
leakage occurred during transport. Label the container to clearly
identify its contents.
Container No. 3. Note the color of the indicating silica gel
to determine if it has been completely spent and make a notation of
its condition. Transfer the silica gel from the fourth impinger to
its original container and seal. A funnel may make it easier to pour
the silica gel without spilling. A rubber policeman may be used as
an aid in removing the silica gel from the impinger. It is not
necessary to remove the small amount of dust particles that may adhere
to the impinger wall and are difficult to remove. Since the gain in
weight is to be used for moisture calculations, do not use any water
198
-------
or other liquids to transfer the silica gel. If a balance is
available in the field, follow the procedure for container No. 3
in Section 4.3.
Impinger Water. Treat the impingers as follows: Make a
notation of any color or film in the liquid catch. Measure the
liquid which is in the first three impingers to within +1 ml by
using a graduated cylinder or by weighing it to within +0.5 g by
using a balance (if one is available). Record the volume or weight
of liquid present. This information is required to calculate the
moisture content of the effluent gas.
Discard the liquid after measuring and recording the volume or
weight, unless analysis of the tmpinger catch is required (see Note,
Section 2.1.7).
If a different type of condenser is used, measure the amount of
moisture condensed either volumetrically or gravimetrically.
Whenever possible, containers should be shipped in such a way that
they remain upright at all times.
4.3 Analysis. Record the data required on a sheet such as the
one shown in Figure 5-3. Handle each sample container as follows:
.Container No. 1. Leave the contents in the shipping container
or transfer the filter and any loose particulate from the sample
container to a tared glass weighing dish. Desiccate for 24 hours
in a desiccator containing anhydrous calcium sulfate. Weigh to a
constant weight and report the results to the nearest 0.1 mg. For
purposes of this Section, 4.3, 'the term "constant weight" means
199
-------
Plant__
Date
Run No
Filter No.
Amount liquid lost during transport
Acetone blank volume, ml.
Acetone wash volume, ml
Acetone blank concentration, mg/mg (equation 5-4).
Acetone wash blank, mg (equation 5-5)
CONTAINER
NUMBER
1
2
TOTAL
WEIGHT OF PARTICULATE COLLECTED.
mg
FINAL WEIGHT
^xC^
TARE WEIGHT
^x^7
Less acetone blank
Weight of paniculate matter
WEIGHT GAIN
FINAL
INITIAL
LIQUID COLLECTED
TOTAL VOLUME COLLECTED
VOLUME OF LIQUID
WATER COLLECTED
IMPINGER
VOLUME,
ml
SILICA GEL
WEIGHT.
9
9* ml
•CONVERT WEIGHT OF WATER TO VOLUME BY DIVIDING TOTAL WEIGHT
INCREASE BY DENSITY OF WATER (Ig/ml).
INCREASE, g
1 g/ml
= VOLUME WATER, ml
Figure 5-3. Analytical data.
200
-------
a difference of no more than 0.5 mg or 1 percent of total weight
less tare weight, whichever is greater, between two consecutive
weighings, with no less than 6 hours of desiccation time between
weighings.
Alternatively, the sample may be oven dried at 105°C (220°F) for
2 to 3 hours, cooled in the desiccator, and weighed to a constant
weight, unless otherwise specified by the Administrator. The tester
may also opt to oven dry the sample at 105°C (220°F) for 2 to 3 hours,
weigh the sample, and use this weight as a final weight.
Container No. 2. Note the level of liquid in the container and
confirm on the analysis sheet whether or not leakage occurred during
transport. If a noticeable amount of leakage has occurred, either void
the sample or use methods, subject to the approval of the Administrator,
to correct the final results. Measure the liquid in this container
either volumetrically to +1 ml or gravimetrically to +0.5 g. Transfer
the contents to a tared 250-ml beaker and evaporate to dryness at ambient
temperature and pressure. Desiccate for 24'hours and weigh to a
constant weight. Report the results to the nearest 0.1 mg.
Container No. 3. Weigh the spent silica gel (or silica gel plus
impinger) to the nearest 0.5 g using a balance. This step may be con-
ducted in the field.
"Acetone Blank" Container. Measure acetone in this container
either volumetrically or gravimetrically. Transfer the acetone to
a tared 250-ml beaker and evaporate to dryness at ambient temperature
and pressure. Desiccate for 24 hours and weigh to a constant weight.
Report the results to the nearest 0.1 mg.
201
-------
Note: At the option of the tester, the contents of Container
No. 2 as well as the acetone blank container may be evaporated at
temperatures higher than ambient. If evaporation is done at an
elevated temperature, the temperature must be below the boiling point
of the solvent; also, to prevent "bumping," the evaporation process
must be closely supervised, and the contents of the beaker must be
swirled occasionally to maintain an even temperature. Use extreme
care, as acetone is highly flammable and has a low flash point.
5. Calibration
Maintain a laboratory log of all calibrations.
5.1 Probe Nozzle. Probe nozzles shall be calibrated before
their initial use in the field. Using a micrometer, measure the
inside diameter of the nozzle to the nearest 0.025 mm (0.001 in.).
Make three separate measurements using different diameters each time,
and obtain the average of the measurements. The difference between
the high and low numbers shall not exceed 0.1 mm (0.004 in.). When
nozzles become nicked, dented, or corroded,'they shall be reshaped,
sharpened, and recalibrated before use. Each nozzle shall be per-
manently and uniquely identified.
5.2 Pitot Tube. The Type S pitot tube assembly shall be calibrated
according to the procedure outlined in Section 4 of Method 2.
5.3 Metering System. Before its initial use in the field, the
metering system shall be calibrated according to the procedure outlined
in APTD-0576. Instead of physically adjusting the dry gas meter dial
readings to correspond to the wet test meter readings, calibration
factors r.ay be used to mathematically correct the gas meter dial readings
to the proper values. Before calibrating the-metering system, it is sug-
gested that a leak-check HP conducted. For metering systems having diaphragm
202
-------
pumps, the normal leak-check procedure will not detect leakages within
the pump. For these cases the following leak-check procedure is
suggested: -make a 10-minute calibration run at 0.00057 m3/min (0.02 cfm);
•at the end of the run, take the difference of the measured wet test meter
and dry gas meter volumes; divide the difference by 10, to get the leak
rate. The leak rate should not exceed 0.00057 m3/min (0.02 cfm).
After each field use, the calibration of the metering system
shall be checked by performing three calibration runs at a single,
intermediate orifice setting (based on the previous field test), with
the vacuum set at the maximum value reached during the test series.
To adjust the vacuum, insert a valve between the wet test meter and
the inlet of the metering system. Calculate the average value of the
calibration factor. If the calibration has changed by more than 5 per-
cent, recalibrate the meter over the full range of orifice settings, as
outlined in APTD-0576.
Alternative procedures, e.g., using the orifice meter coeffi-
cients, Tiay be used, subject to the approval of the Administrator.
Note: If the dry gas meter coefficient values obtained before
and after a test series differ by more than 5 percent, the test
series shall either be voided, or calculations for the test series
shall be performed using whichever meter coefficient value (i.e.,
before or after) gives the lower value of total sample volume.
5.4 Probe Heater Calibration. The probe heating system shall be
calibrated before its initial use in the field according to the pro-
cedure outlined in APTD-0576. Probes constructed according to APTD-0581
need not be calibrated if the calibration curves in APTD-0576 are used.
5.5 Temperature Gauges. Use the procedure in Section 4.3 of
Method 2 to calibrate in-stack temperature gauges. Dial thermometers,
203
-------
such as are used for the dry gas meter and condenser outlet, shall be
calibrated against mercury-in-glass thermometers.
5.6 Leak Check of Metering System Shown in Figure 5-1. That
portion of the sampling train from the pump to the orifice meter
should be leak checked prior to initial use and after each shipment.
Leakage after the pump will result in less volume being recorded than
is actually sampled. The following procedure is suggested (see
Figure 5-4): Close the main valve on the meter box. Insert a one-
hole rubber stopper with rubber tubing attached into the orifice
exhaust pipe. Disconnect and vent the low side of the orifice manometer.
Close off the low side orifice tap. Pressurize the system to 13 to
18 cm (5 to 7 in.) water column by blowing into the rubber tubing.
Pinch off the tubing and observe the manometer for one minute. A loss
of pressure on the manometer indicates a leak in the meter box; leaks,
if present, must be corrected.
5.7 Barometer. Calibrate against a mercury barometer.
6. Calculations
Carry out calculations, retaining at least one extra decimal
figure beyond that of the acquired data. Round off figures after
the final calculation. Other forms of the equations may be used as
long as they give equivalent results.
6.1 Nomenclature.
2 2
A = Cross-sectional area of nozzle, m (ft ).
B = Water vapor in the gas stream, proportion by volume.
ws
C = Acetone blank residue concentration, mg/g.
a
c = Concentration of particulate matter in stack gas, dry
basis, corrected to standard conditions, g/dscm (g/dscf).
I = Percent of isokinetic sampling.
204
-------
ro
o
RUBBER
TUBING
RUBBER
STOPPER
ORIFICE
VACUUM
GAUGE
BLOW INTO TUBING
UNTIL MANOMETER
READS 5 TO 7 INCHES
WATER COLUMN
ORIFICE
MANOMETER
MAIN VALVE
CLOSED
AIR-TIGHT
PUMP
Figure 5-4. Leak check of meter box.
-------
L = Maximum acceptable leakage rate for either a pretest
a
leak check or for a leak check following a component
change; equal to 0.00057 m /min (0.02 cfm) or 4 percent
of the average sampling rate, whichever is less.
L. = Individual leakage rate observed during the leak check
conducted prior to the "i " component change (i = 1,
2, 3. . . .n), m /min .Jcfm).
y
L = Leakage rate observed during the post-test leak check,
m' /min (cfm).
m = Total amount of particulate matter collected, mg.
M = Molecular weight of water, 18.0 g/g-mole (18.0 Ib/lb-mole).
w
m = Mass of residue of acetone after evaporation, mg.
a
P, = Barometric pressure at the sampling site, mm Hg (in. Hg).
oar
P = Absolute stack gas pressure, mm Hg (in. Hg).
P d = Standard absolute pressure, 760 mm Hg (29.92 in. Hg).
R = Ideal gas constant, 0.06236 mm Hg-m3/°K-g-mole (21.85 in.
Hg-ft3/°R-lb-mole).
T = Absolute average dry gas meter temperature (see Figure 5-2),
°
K
T = Absolute average stack gas temperature (see Figure 5-2),
°
K
T = Standard absolute temperature, 293°K (528°R).
V = Volume of acetone blank, ml.
a
V = Volume of acetone used in wash, ml.
206
-------
V-j = Total volume of liquid collected in impingers and
silica gel (see Figure 5-3), ml.
Vm = Vo^ume °f 9as sample as measured by dry gas meter,
dcm (dcf).
Vm(std)= Vo''ume °^ 9as sample measured by the dry gas meter,
corrected to standard conditions, dscm (dscf).
V / ,v= Volume of water vapor in the gas sample, corrected to
standard conditions, scm (scf).
v = Stack gas velocity, calculated by Method 2, Equation 2-9,
using data obtained from Method 5, m/sec (ft/sec).
W = Weight of residue in acetone wash, mg.
a
Y = Dry gas meter calibration factor.
AH = Average pressure differential across the orifice meter
(see Figure 5-2), mm HgO (in. H20).
p = Density of acetone, mg/ml (see label on bottle).
3
p = Density of water, 0.9982 g/ml (0.002201 lb/ml.).
W
e = Total sampling time, min.
e, = Sampling time interval, from the beginning of a run until
the first component change, min.
6. = Sampling time interval, between two successive component
changes, beginning with the interval between the first
and second changes, min.
e = Sampling time interval, from the final (n ) component
change until the end of the sampling run, min.
207
-------
13.6 = Specific gravity of mercury.
60 = Sec/min.
100 = Conversion to percent.
6.2- Average dry gas meter temperature and average orifice
pressure drop. See data sheet (Figure 5-2).
6.3 Dry Gas Volume. Correct the sample volume measured by the
dry gas meter to standard conditions (20°C, 760 mm Hg or 68°F,
29.92 in. Hg) by using Equation 5-1.
v _ u Y I std
Vm(std) - VmYlT
std
* K,V Y
(AH/13.6)
Equation 5-1
where:
KI = 0.3858 °K/mm Hg for metric units
= 17.64 °R/in. Hg for English units
Note: Equation 5-1 can be used as written unless the leakage
rate observed during any of the mandatory leak checks O.e., the
post-test leak check or leak checks conducted prior to component
changes) exceeds L . If L_ or L. exceeds L , Equation 5-1 must be
a p i a
modified as follows:
(a) Case I. No component changes made during sampling run. In
this case, replace V in Equation 5-1 with the expression:
m
[V - (L - L ) 6]
m p a
208
-------
(b) Case II. One or more component changes made during the
sampling run. In this case, replace Vm in Equation 5-1 by the
expression:
V* - «1 - 2 (1-1 - L.) 6, - Up - L.) 6p]
and substitute only for those leakage rates (L^ or L ) which exceed
6.4 Volume of water vapor.
Equation 5-2
n ^ .I w w y * ** V ' 'ui / \ r ^ ^ /4 / fc ' **
\ / \ Stu /
where:
K2 = 0.001333 m /ml for metric units
= 0.04707 ft3/ml for English units.
6.5 Moisture Content.
Bwc = rj ' . Equation 5-3
ws V + Vw(std)
Mote: In saturated or water droplet-laden gas streams, two
calculations of the moisture content of the stack gas shall be made,
one from the impinger analysis '(Equation 5-3), and a second from the
assumption of saturated conditions. The lower of the two values of
B shall be considered correct. The procedure for determining the
W 5
moisture content based upon assumption of saturated conditions is
given in the Note of Section 1.2 of Method 4. For the purposes of this
method, the average stack gas temperature from Figure 5-2 may be used to
make this determination, provided that the accuracy of the in-stack
temperature sensor is +_ l°c (2°F).
209
-------
6.6 Acetone Blank Concentration.
ma
Ca ' Va"a
6.7 Acetone Wash Blank.
Wa = Ca Vaw pa
Equation 5-4
Equation 5-5
6.8 Total Particulate Weight. Determine the total particulate
catch from the sum of the weights obtained from containers 1 and 2
less the acetone blank (see Figure 5-3). Note: Rfrfer to Section
4.1.5 to assist in calculation of results involving two or more
filter assemblies or two or more sampling trains.
6.9 Particulate Concentration.
c£ = (0.001 g/mg)
6.10 Conversion Factors:
From
scf
g/ft3
g/ft3
J_£
m3
gr/ft
lb/ft
3
g/ft g/m
6.11 Isokinetic Variation.
6.11.1 Calculation From Raw Data.
lc
(V
m
60 9 v P A
s s n
Equation 5-6
Multiply by
0.02832
15.43
2.205 x 10
35.31
~3
Equation 5-7
210
-------
where:
K. = 0.003454 mm Hg-m3/m1-°K for metric units
= 0.002669 in. Hg-ft3/ml-°R for English units.
6.11.2 Calculation From Intermediate Values.
Ts Vstd) Pstd 10°
'S
Tstd
< Ps v ws
where:
K4 = 4.320 for metric units
= 0.09450 for English units.
6.12 Acceptable Results. If 90 percent <_ I <_ 110 percent, the
results are acceptable. If the results are low in comparison to the
standard and I is beyond the acceptable range, or, if I is less than
90 percent, the Administrator may opt to accept the results. Use
Citation 4 to make judgments. Otherwise, reject the results and repeat
the test.
7. Bibliography
1. Addendum to Specifications for Incinerator Testing at Federal
Facilities. PHS, NCAPC. Dec. 6, 1967.
2. Martin, Robert M. Construction Details of Isokinetic Source-
Sampling Equipment. Environmental Protection Agency. Research
Triangle Park, N. C. APTD-0581. April, 1971.
3. Rom, Jerome J. Maintenance, Calibration, and Operation
of Isokinetic Source Sampling Equipment. Environmental Protection
Agency. Research Triangle Park, N. C. APTD-0576. March, 1972.
211
-------
4. Smith, W. S., R. T. Shigehara, and W. F. Todd. A Method
of Interpreting Stack Sampling Data. Paper Presented at the
63d Annual Meeting of the Air Pollution Control Association,
St. -Louis, Mo. June 14-19, 1970.
5. Smith, W. S., et al. Stack Gas Sampling Improved and
Simplified With New Equipment. APCA Paper No. 67-1-19. 1967.
6. Specifications for Incinerator Testing at Federal Facilities.
PHS, NCAPC. 1967.
7. Shigehara, R.T. Adjustments in the EPA Nomograph for
Different Pitot Tube Coefficients and Dry Molecular Weights. Stack
Sampling News 2_:4-ll. October, 1974.
8. Vollaro, R. F. A Survey of Commercially Available Instrumentation
For the Measurement of Low-Range Gas Velocities. U. S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Emission Measurement Branch. Research Triangle
Park, N. C. November, 1976 (unpublished paper).
9. Annual Book of ASTM Standards. Part 26. Gaseous Fuels;
Coal and Coke; Atmospheric Analysis. American Society for Testing
and Materials. Philadelphia, Pa. 1974. pp. 617-622.
212
-------
TECHNICAL REPORT DATA
(Please read Instructions on the reverse before completing)
1. REPORT NO.
2.
3. RECIPIENT'S ACCESSION-NO.
4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE
5. REPORT DATE
Analysis of State and Federal Participate and Visible
Emission Regulations for Combustion Sources
January 1982
6. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE
7. AUTHOR(S)
David Dunbar, B.E. Blagun, and Donald J. Henz
8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NO.
PN 3525-12
9. PERFORMING ORG \NIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS
PEDCo Environmental, Inc.
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, Ohio 45246
10. PROGRAM ELEMENT NO.
11. CONTRACT/GRANT NO.
68-02-3512
Work Assignment No. 12
12. SPONSORING AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Air Quality Planning & Standards
Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711
13. TYPE OF REPORT AND PERIOD COVERED
Final
14. SPONSORING AGENCY CODE
15. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES
U.S. EPA Project Office - Kenneth R. Woodard
16. ABSTRACT
This document provides a compilation of the particulate and visible emission
limits from the State Implementation Plans (SIP's) and Federal Standards of
Performance for New Stationary Sources that are applicable to fuel combustion
sources. A comparison of mass emission rates along with a summary of the
mass and visible emission regulations by state or territory is presented.
This document also provides our overview of the emissions from boilers and
the control techniques typically being used to meet the current SIP require-
ments.
17.
KEY WORDS AND DOCUMENT ANALYSIS
DESCRIPTORS
b. IDENTIFIERS/OPEN ENDED TERMS
COSATI Field/Group
Air Pollution
Combustion
Opacity
Particles
State Implementation Plan
New Source Performance
Standards
Emission Regulations
Visible Emissions
Particulate Emissions
13B
21B
14G
18. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT
Unlimited
19. SECURITY CLASS (This Report)
Unclassified
21. NO. OF PAGES
212
20. SECURITY CLASS (Thispage)
Unclassified
22. PRICE
EPA Form 2220-1 (9-73)
-------