WORKING PAPER NO.  42
           COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN  PROJECT
   For Water Supply and Water Quality Management
             UPPER SNAKE BASIN (IDAHO)
         ECONOMIC BASE STUDY AMD FORECAST
                     1960-2010
                    March 1963
U. S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, EDUCATION, AND WELFARE
               Public Health Service
                     Region IX
  Division of Water Supply and Pollution Control
                 570 Pittock Block
              Portland, Oregon  97205

-------
                       WORKING PAPER NO.  42
                   COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN PROJECT
           For Water Supply and Water Quality Management
                     UPPER SNAKE BASIN (IDAHO)
                 ECONOMIC BASE STUDY AND FORECAST
                             1960-2010
DATE:   March, 1963

Prepared by   RLC

Reviewed by 	

Approved by 	
DISTRIBUTION

Project Staff
Cooperating Agencies

General
        U. S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, EDUCATION, AND WELFARE
                       Public Health Service
                             Region IX
          Division of Water Supply and Pollution Control
                         570 Pittock Block
                        Portland 5, Oregon

-------
This working paper contains preliminary data and information primarily
intended for internal use by the Columbia River Basin staff and
cooperating agencies.  The material presented in this paper has not
been fully evaluated and should not be considered as final.

-------
                              FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY
     INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM
  COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN PROJECT
    UPPER SNAKE BASIN (IDAHO)
ECONOMIC BASE STUDY AND FORECAST
            1960-2010
  Prepared by:  R. L.  Cough!in
         March 22, 1963

-------
                     UPPER SNAKE BASIN (IDAHO)
                 ECONOMIC BASE STUDY AND FORECAST
                             1960-2010
                         Table of Contents

SUMMARY                                                1
I.  INTRODUCTION                                       4
    A.  Purpose of this Analysis                       4
    B.  Definition of the Area                         4
    C.  Study Period                                   4
    D.  Limitations of this Analysis                   4
II.  PRESENT ECONOMIC BASE                             5
    A.  Population                                     5
    B.  Industry                                      15
III.  GROWTH POTENTIALS AND FORECAST                  51
    A.  Factors Influencing Future Growth             51
    B.  Estimated Future Population                   73
Prepared by:  Economic Studies Group
              Water Supply and Pollution
              Control Program, Pacific Northwest
                            March, 1963

-------
                                                                         C-l
                          UPPER SNAKE BASIN (IDAHO)
                      ECONOMIC BASE STUDY AND FORECAST
                                  1960-2010
SUMMARY
     The population of the Upper Snake Basin in 1960 was 274,187, about
41 per-cent of the total population of Idaho.   Population density is
greatest along the Snake River, thinning above Idaho Falls.   Over the
last two decades growth has been faster than that of the rest of the
state, with the Upper Snake Basin growing in population at a one percent
annual rate between 1940 and 1950 and a 1.4 percent annual rate between
1950 and 1960, compared to a .9 percent and one percent for the state as
a whole.  Population growth has been restricted to urban areas, with
rural populations declining;  and the growth of the three largest cities,
Pocatello, Idaho Falls, and Twin Falls has occurred at a rate over twice
that of other urban places.
     The economy is based on agriculture, food processing, phosphate
mining and manufacturing, with transportation and a nuclear reactor
project of the AEC also important elements in the regional economy.
Service industries are well developed, partially due to the presence
within the basin of several major tourist attractions.  Among services,
wholesale trade and education are particu-larly strong, due to the
handling requirements of the agricultural product and the presence of a
two-year college, a four-year college, and a vocational train-ing school.
     The western part of the basin, centered on the City of Twin Falls,
depends largely on agriculture and a well-developed food processing
industry.  The northeastern part of the basin relies to a great extent
on agriculture.  In the central part of the basin a diversified economic
base has been" built on  phosphate production, agriculture, transportation,
a nuclear reactor project, and the service and miscellaneous manufacturing

-------
                                                                         C-2
industries characteristic of  urban areas;   the two Cities  of Idaho Falls and

Pocatello lie within this central  part of the basin.

     In recent years agricultural  employment has fallen  steeply throughout the

basin as a result of sharply increased labor productivity and farm consolidation.

The economic effect of the drop was nullified by increased  processing of the

agricultural output.  Sugar refining and potato processing  have grown particu-

larly rapidly, but meet packing and processing of diary  products have also

advanced with considerable vigor.   Employment and output of the chemical in-

dustry, including both phosphate production and the nuclear reactor project,

have risen sharply.  With growth of population and urban concentration of popu-

lation, the ratio of service and miscellaneous manufacturing employment to

total employment has also been rising.

     Following is the summary of the derivation of labor force and population

models for 1985 and 2010:

                                                Employment    Forecast  (1,000's)
                                                  1985        2010
Agriculture:  9.5% reduction in number of farms
              to 1985, reduction in employment
              at 75% of the rate of reduction
              in farm units	19.8
              Employment stable from 1985 to 2010	19.8

Food Processing:  potato processing growing at a
              2% rate, based on population. . . . 4.3	7.1
              meat packing growing at a 5% rate
              to 1970, based on current outlook;
              at a 2% rate, based on western
              population to 2010	8  .... 1.4
              all other processing growing at 65%
              of the rate of national population
              growth	4.1  .... 5.5

Phosphate:    Growth at a 4.5% rate to 1985, 150% 2.8
              of the rate of national population
              to 2010	 5.4

-------
                                                                         C-3
                                                       Employment  Forecast  (1,000's)
Other chemicals:  Thiokol employment to reach
              3,000 by 1985, other chemical
              manufacturing employment to grow
              at a 4.5% rate	7.7
              from 1985 to 2010 employment to
              rise at same rate as national
              population	12.0

Other manufacturing:  to grow at half the rate
              of chemical and food processing
              employment combined to 1985, main-
              tain the same rate to 2010	5.3	8.7

Construction:  to occupy 7% of the labor force
              in Area II, 6% in Area I and
              Area III	  11.2	16.8

Transportation:  Railroad employment to increase
              50% of the rate of national popu-
              lation to 1985, same rate as
              population 1985 to 2010; other
              transportation employment to grow
              at 65% of the rate of national
              population .	8.5	12.8

Services:     to add .3% per year to their per-
              centate of total employment, with
              65% of the labor force assigned
              as ceiling for service ratio	105.9.  .  .  .  165.7

Unemployment:  to amount to 4% of the labor force  ...   6.7	10.5

Labor Force:  Sum of the above	177.2.  .  .  .  265.7

Population:  2.63 times labor force, same ratio
              as 1960	466.2.  .  .  .  699.1
     Growth is forecast to be most rapid in study Area II, where the Pocatello-

Idaho Falls region appears likely to experience sharp industrial expansion.

The population model for 1985 allots 145.7 thousand to Area I, 277.4 thousand

to Area II, and 42.6 thousand to Area III.  For 2010, the projection assumes

215 thousand, 422 thousand, and 61.5 thousand in the respective areas.

-------
                                                                    C-4

I.   INTRODUCTION
    A.   Purpose of This Analysis
        This analysis is intended to provide a  preliminary estimate of the
economic potentials and anticipated growth of the subject area.
    B.   Definition of the Area
        In physical terms the Upper Snake Basin may be said to include that
portion of the Snake River drainage area extending from above  the source of the
cna'-e,  "oai" Yellowstone National Park,  to the Thousand Springs,  downriver from
the City of Twin Falls.  For the purposes of this paper, political  divisions
(i.e. counties) which correspond very closely to the physical  boundaries of
the area will be employed.  To facilitate consideration of so  large an area,
the study area is divided into three sub-areas, distinguished  by distinct
economic differences.
        Area I is composed of Camas, Gooding, Twin Falls, Elaine, Lincoln,
Jerome, Minidoka, and Cassia Counties.
        Area II is composed of Butte, Bingham,  Power, Bannock, Caribou, and
Bonneville Counties.
        Area III is composed of Jefferson, Madison, Teton, Clark and Fremont
Counties.
    C.. Study Period
        The study period is the 50-year period 1960-2010, with an interim
point at 1985.
    D.   Limitations of This Analysis
        1.  This study is intended only as a preliminary estimate of the out-
look for the subject area's growth.  Subsequently, in connection with the
Columbia River Basin Project for Water Supply and Water Quality Management,

-------
                                                                    C-5
an analysis will be made on an industry-by-industry basis of the growth poten-
tial in the various subbasins.  At that time, this preliminary estimate will
be reviewed", and revised if necessary.
        2.  This study is intended for use particularly in assessing future
water needs.  Emphasis has been placed on the analysis of those industries
which make heavy demands upon the water resource.   Other industries have been
considered only insofar as they may have a significant effect on future popu-
lation.  For this reason, this study is not submitted as a detailed industrial
forecast.
    II.  PRESENT ECONOMIC BASE
         A.  Population
             The population of the Upper Snake Basin at April, 1960 was 274,187,
about 41 percent of the total population of the State of Idaho.  The basin con-
tains three of  Idaho's four largest cities, Pocatello (largest in the state),
Idaho Falls, and Twin Falls, and twelve of the thirty-four places with a popu-
lation of 2,500 or more in the state.  Table I lists the population of the
basin's principal divisions.
                                    TABLE I
                                (on next page)

-------
                                                                       C-6
                                      TABLE I

                    POPULATION,  UPPER SNAKE BASIN,  APRIL,  1960 I/

                                   Region Area I
Region                                               Population
                                     Urban k/              Rural           Total
Camas County	  917
  Fairfield                            474
  Rural                                                    443
Gooding County	9,544
  Gooding                            2,750
  Hagerman                             430
  Wendell                            1,232
  Rural                                                  5,132
Twin Falls County	41,842
  Buhl                               3,059
  Castleford                           274
  Filer                              1,249
  Hansen                               427
  Kimberly                           1,298
  Twin Falls                        20,126
  Rural                                                 15,409
Elaine County  	  4,598
  Bellevue                             384
  Hailey                             1,185
  Ketchum                              746
  Sun Valley                           317
  Rural                                                  1,966
Lincoln County	3,686
  Richfield                            329
  Shoshone                           1,146
  Rural                                                  2,211
Jerome County	11,712
  Eden                                 426
  Hazel ton                             433
  Jerome                             4,761
  Rural                                                  6,092
Minidoka County	14,394
  Heyburn                              829
  Paul                                 701
  Rupert                             4,153
  Rural                                                  8,711
Cassia County	16,121
  Albion                               415
  Burley                             7,508
  Oakley                               613
  Rural                                                  7,585
AREA  I TOTAL                        55,265              47,549         102,814

-------
                                                                       C-7
Table I Population, 1960 (Continued)

                                 Region Area II

Region                             Urban Jl/             Rural          Total

Butte County	 .  .3,498
  Arco                             1,562
  Moore                              358
  Rural                                                1,578
Bingham County 	  28,218
  Aberdeen                         1,484
  Blackfoot                        7,378
  Basalt                             275
  Firth                              322
  Shelley                          2,612
  Rural                                               16,147
Power County	4,111
  American Falls                   2,123
  Rock!and                           258
  Rural                                                1,730
Bannock County 	  49,342
  Downey                             726
  Inkom                              528
  Lava Hot Springs                   593
  Arimo                              303
  McCammon                           557
  Pocatello                       40,784 £/
  Rural                                                8,112
Caribou County	5,976
  Bancroft                           416
  Grace                              725
  Soda Aprings                     2,424
  Rural                                                2,411
Bonneville County	46,906
  Ammon                            1,882
  Idaho Falls                     33,161
  Irwin                              330
  Ucon                               532
  loria                               702
  Rural                                               10,299

AREA  II TOTAL                    100,035              38,016        138,051


                         (Table  I continued on  next page)

-------
                                                                        C-8
Table I Population, 1960 (Continued)

                                 Region Area III

Region                             Urban k/            Rural           Total

Jefferson County 		  11,672
  Lewisvilie                         385
  Menan                              496
  Rigby                            2,281
  Ririe                              560
  Roberts                            422
  Rural                                                7,528
Madison County 	   9,417
  Sugar City                         584
  Rexburg                          4,767
  Rural                                     .           4,066
Teton County	2,639
  Driggs                             824
  Rural                                                1,815
Clark County	     915
  Dubois                             447
  Rural                                                  468
Fremont County 	   8,679
  Ashton                           1,242
  Parker                             284
  St. Anthony                      2,700
  Newdale                            272
  Teton                              399
  Rural                                                3,782

AREA III TOTAL                    15,663              17,659         33,322

UPPER SNAKE TOTAL                170,963             103,224        274,187
a/  U. S. Census of Population, 1960.

b/  All settled places with a population of 250 or more at April, 1960.

£/  Pocatello population includes Alameda and Chubbuck, annexed after 1960.

-------
                                                                       C-9
          The Snake River is the center of population,  with  most settlements
located on or near the river.   Population thins  out from the Snake in a region
of volcanic plains enclosed by the Rocky Mountains, v/ith population being
sparsest in the mountainous areas.
          Division of population among the three sub-regions is uneven.  Area
II contained 50.4 percent of the basin's 1960 population, with 27 percent of
the Upper Snake's inhabitants concentrated in the two cities of Pocatello and
Idaho Falls.  In contrast, Area III, unindustrialized and situated at the foot
of the Rockies, contained less than 12.2 percent of the total population of the
Upper Snake Basin.  Indeed, the I960 population  of this five-county area was
only slightly more than that of Idaho Falls, and well under  that of Pocatello.
          Table II lists population density of the basin's principal divisions.
                               TABLE II
                            (on next page)

-------
                                TABLE  II
            POPULATION  DENSITY,-  UPPER SNAKE BASIN, APRIL, 1960
                                                                       C-10
Region

Camas County
Gooding County
Twin Falls County
Elaine County
Lincoln County
Jerome County
Minidoka County                              .
Cassia County

    AREA I

Butte County                                .
Bingham County
Power County
Bannock County
Caribou County
Bonneville County

    AREA II

Jefferson County
Madison County
Teton County
Clark County
Fremont County

    AREA III

Upper Snake Basin

Idaho

Highest Density Among Idaho Counties (Canyon)

Lowest Density Among Idaho Counties (Clark)
                                                                Inhabitants per
                                                                  Square Mile

                                                                        .9
                                                                     13.2
                                                                     21.5
                                                                      1.7
                                                                      3.1
                                                                     19.8
                                                                     19.2
                                                                      6.3

                                                                      8.9

                                                                      1.6
                                                                     13.6
                                                                      2.9
                                                                     43.9
                                                                      3.4
                                                                     25.7

                                                                     13.2

                                                                     10.7
                                                                     19.9
                                                                      5.7
                                                                        .5
                                                                      4.8

                                                                      5.9

                                                                      9.9

                                                                      8.1

                                                                     99.4

                                                                        .5
a/ U, S. Census of Population, 1960.

-------
                                                                      C-ll
     Over the last thirty years the Upper Snake Basin has  experienced almost the
same rate of population growth as the State of Idaho.  While growth was some-
what slower during the nineteen-thirties, it exceeded that of the state during
the 'forties and 'fifties.  The growth rate in Area I has  declined in each of
the last three decades, that of Area II has risen, while the population of
Area III has remained practically static, as indicated by  Table III.
                                 TABLE III
                              (on next page)

-------
1,411
. 7,580
29,828
3,768
3,242
8,358
8,403
13,116
1,360
9,257
36,403
5,295
4,230
9,900
9,870
14,430
1,079
11,101
40,979
5,384
4,256
12,080
9,785
14,629
917
9,544
41 ,842
4,598
3,686
11,712
14,394
16,121
.
2.0%
1.9
3.3
2.6
1.8
1.7
.9
.
1.9%
1.4
.2
0
2.0
-
.2
.
-
.2%
-
-
-
3.5
.9

.6%
1.2
.6
.4
1.1
1.8
.7
                                                                           C-12
                                       TABLE  III


               COUNTY POPULATION GROWTH,  UPPER SNAKE  BASIN,  1930  -  1960 2/

                                  No.  of  Inhabitants         Annual Growth  Rate  (Compound)

Region.            1930     1940     1950     1960      1930-40     40-50     50-60     30^60

Camas County
Gooding County
Twin Falls Cty
Elaine County
Lincoln County
Jerome County
Minidoka Cty
Cassia County

AREA I            75,706   90,745   99,293  102,814       1.8        .9         .4      1.0

Butte County
Bingham Cty
Power County
BMK>ck Cty
Cawbou Cty
Bonneville Cty

AREA II

Jefferson Cty
Madison County
Teton County
Clark County
Fremont County

AREA III

Upper Snake
  Basin          185,815  215,229  239,929  274,187       1.4       1.0        1.4      1.4

Idaho      '      445,032  524,873  588,637  667,191       1.8        .9        1.0      1.4
1,934
18,561
4,457
31,266
2,121
19,664
78,003
9.171
8,316
3,573
1,122
9.924
32,106
1,877
21,044
3,965
34,759
2,284
25,697
89,626
10,762
9,186
3,601
1,005
10,304
34,858
2,722
23,271
3,988
41,745
5,576
30,210
107,512
10,495
9,156
3,204
918
9,351
33,124
3,498
28,218
4,111
49,342
5,976
46,906
138,051
11,672
9,417
2,639
915
8,679
33,322
-
1.0
-
.8
.6
2.6
1.4
1.6
.9
0
-
.3
.8
4.0
.9
0
1.8
9.5
1.6
1.8
_
-
-
-
-
-
2.4
1.9
.2
1.8
.6
4.5
2.4
.8
.3
-
0
-
.3
2.0
1.4
-
1.6
3.5
3.0
1.9
.6
.2
-
-
-
.3
a/  U. S. Census of Population, 1950, 1960

-------
                                                                      C-13
     Population growth has been concentrated in  urban  locations.   Between  1950
and 1960 the urban portion of jthe basin's population (for the purposes  of  this
study, those living in towns of 250 or more persons) rose from 135,304  - 56 per-
cent of total population - to 170,963 or 62.5 percent of total population.
During the same period, rural population declined from 104,625 to 103,224.   In
only five counties, Jefferson,  Bingham, Butte, Bonneville and Minidoka, did
rural population rise\in response to added irrigation  or industrial  development.
In general, population growth was greatest in the larger cities,  as  indicated
in Table IV.
                                 TABLE IV
                              (on next page)

-------
                                                                     C-14
                                TABLE IV

             GROWTH  OF CITIES WITH 1960 POPULATIONS OVER 2,500 I/
Region.

Gooding
Buhl
Twin Falls
Jerome
Rupert
Burley

Blackfoot
Shelley
Pocatello £/
Idaho Falls

Rexburg
St. Anthony
Three principal
cities
All other cities
1940

2,568
2,414
11,851
3,537
3,167
5,329

3,681
1,751
20,824
15,024

3,437
2,719
47,699
28,603
1950
AREA I
3,099
2,870
17,600
4,523
3,098
5,924
AREA II
5,180
1,856
27,737
19,218
AREA III
4,253
2,695
64,555
33,498
1960

2,750
3,059
20,126
4,761
4,153
7,508

7,378
2,612
40,784
33,161

4,767
2,700
94,071
39,688
                                                 Growth
                                                  Rate
                                                 1940-50
                                                   1.8
                                                   1.8
                                                   4.0
                                                   2.4

                                                   1.0
                                                   3.4
                                                    .4
                                                   2.8
                                                   2.5
                                                   2.0
Growth
 Rate
1950-60
                                                   3.0

                                                   1.6
   .4
  1.6
   .8
  2.9
  2.4
  3.5
  3.4
  3.7
  5.5
  1.0
    0
  3.7

  1.6
Growth
 Rate
1940-60
   .4
  1.3
  2.6
  1.5
  1.3
  1.7
  3.5
  2.0
  3.4
  4.0
  1.6
    0
  3.5

  1.6
a/  U.  S.  Census of Population,  1950,  1960.
b/  Includes Chubbuck and  Alameda

-------
                                                                             C-15
         B.   Industry
             1.   General
                 The economy of the Upper Snake Basin  is  quite specialized,
though it is achieving a steadily rising level  of diversity.   Agriculture is
the major economic activity of the region.   The relative  importance of manu-
facturing and service industries is growing, however;   and food processing,  the
chemical industry, transportation and tourism are all  important elements  in  the
regional economy.
                 Table V contrasts 1960 employment in  the Upper Snake Basin
with a model of an hypothetical area employing a labor force  equal  in size to
that of the Upper Snake Basin, but. distributed in the  same proportions as total
U. S. employment.  Assuming that productivity in different areas and different
industries is comparable, the model suggests the number of workers  who would be
employed in various industries ("expectable employment")  in a self-contained
economy of the size of the Upper Snake Basin, which displayed the same kinds
and amounts of per-capita production as did the U. S.  during  1960.   While the
model is, of course, an over-simplification, it serves to illustrate the  nature
of regional economic specialization.
                 It is assumed that those industries in which employment  exceeds
the "expectable" are in some measure externally oriented - that is, that  the
products of these industries are exchanged in other regions for those goods
and services in which the study area is deficient.  Similarly, a deficit  from
the expected level of employment in an industry is assumed to represent the
approximate degree of the region's dependance on other areas  for the product
of that industry.

-------
                                                                                C-16
                                          TABLE  V  a/

                      UPPER SNAKE BASIN  EMPLOYMENT, 1960, COMPARED TO
                       MODEL BASED ON  1960 U.  S. AVERAGE EMPLOYMENT
Industry

Agriculture                           6.2
Forestry & fisheries                   .1
Mining                                 .9

Manufacturing
   lumber & ...pdts.                  1.5
   primary & fabctd. metals           3.8
   machinery, incl. el.               4.6
   transportation eqpt.               2.6
   other durables                     2.0
   food & kindred                     2.7
   textiles & apparel                 3.2
   printing & publishing              1.7
   chemical & allied                  1.2
   other non-durables                 2.5

Construction                          5.6

R.R. transportation                   1.3
Other transportation                  2.7
Communications & utilities            2.5

Wholesale trade                       3.2
Retail trade                         14.3
Find., business & repair service     6.3
Personal service                      6.4
Education                             5.0
Other professional                    6.3
Public Administration                 4.7
Industries not reported               3.8

Unemployed'                           5.0

Total Labor Force                   100.5
(Employment in 1,000's)

"Expectable"     Actual
                 21.3
                   .3
                   .2
                   .3
                   .2
                   .4
                   .1
                   .5
                  4.7
                   .1
                   .9
                  2.4
                   .3

                  6.4

                  3.1
                  3.2
                  2.7

                  4.6
                 15.6
                  6.5
                  6.2
                  5.4
                  4.8
                  4.1
                  2.0

                  4.1

                100.5
Externally
 Oriented

   15.1
     .2
    2.0
    1.2
     .8

    1.8
     .5
     .2

    1.4
    1.3
     .2

     .4
Deficit,
Employment
Equivalent
                     .7
   1.2
   3.6
   4.2
   2.5
   1.5

   3.1
    .8

   2.2
    .2

   1.5
    .6
   1.8

    .9
a/  Source:  U. S. Census of Population, 1960.

-------
                                                                          C-17
     The preeminent place of agriculture in the area's economy is readily
ipparent from the table.  It accounts for three-fifths of the region's economic
specialization, as measured by externally-oriented employment.  Food-processing
which ranks second to agriculture in degree of external orientation, is
dependant on the products of agriculture for its raw materials.   Moreover, a
good part of the externally oriented wholesale trade arises from distribution
of raw and processed agricultural products.  Chemical manufacturing, at twice
the expectable level, is derived from exploitation of extensive phosphate de-
posits and a nuclear reactor project of the Atomic Energy Commission.
     The major externally oriented service industry is transportation.
The presence within the basin of a major railroad depot - Pocatello - and the
need to ship out bulk goods, as well as ship in most manufactures for distri-
bution over a wide, sparsely settled area, explains the external orientation
of much transportation employment.  The high level of employment in retail
trade may be explained in part by external orientation in connection with
tourism.  It should be noted, however, that sparse settlement, with consequent
fractionation of retail markets and relatively low productivity in retail
distribution, may also account in part for the unusual level of employment in
retailing.  In education, two colleges whose student bodies are drawn in part
form outside the region provide some measure of external orientation.
     The external orientation of construction is probably due to the
importation of capital - including public works - characteristic of a re-
source oriented economy, as well as to the presence in the basin of the main
offices of several moderately large construction firms.

-------
                                                                      C-18
     The obvious area of industry deficit is in manufacturing,  where the
Upper Snake Basin specializes in food processing and chemical manufacture
and relies to a great extent on imports for its supplies  of other manufactured
goods.  Service industry representation is fairly close to the  national  average,
with the exception of wholesale trade and transportation, where the area dis-
plays an external orientation, and professional services, where the area is
obviously well below average.
     Within the Upper Snake Basin there is a distinct difference between
the three sub-regions in terms of economic activity.  The counties comprising
Area I rely heavily on agriculture, but have achieved considerable economic
balance through the development of a vigorous food-processing  industry,  and
from the existence of a broad base of services, resting partly  on relatively
high population density for an agricultural region, partly on  tourism.   Area II
is the most industrialized part of Idaho.  Manufacturing and transportation are
each of only slightly less weight than agriculture in terms of  employment,
while a high level of service activities meets the requirements of this  region
of comparatively high urbanization and population density.  Area III remains
largely dependant on agriculture.
     2.  Area I
         Table VI lists employment in various industries at April, 1960
for each county of Area I.  Trends in the area's employment are shown in Table X.
         Agriculture, occupying 28 percent of the labor force  in 1960,  is
clearly the predominant element in the area's economy.  Rich soil and a  favor-
able climate have been complimented by extensive irrigation to  create a  pro-
duct! veand diverse agricultural base.  Alfalfa hay, potatoes,  sugar beets and

-------
                                                                             C-19
wheat are the major crops, with dry beans also grown in substantial  quantities
around Twin Falls.  Expansion of farmland since World War II  has  been concen-
trated on irrigated farming and grazing.   Dry farming, with wheat the principal
crop, has remained virtually static in terms of acreage, though productivity
gains have resulted in a considerable increase in output.  Abundant ground
water and adequate financing have promoted wide expansion of  irrigaiton, with
Minidoka and Cassia Counties leaders in extension of irrigation in the Upper
Snake Basin during the last decade.
                                  TABLE VI
                               (on next page)

-------
o
CM
 I
                       TABLE VI

AREA I COUNTIES:   EMPLOYMENT DISTRIBUTION,  APRIL,  1960
     .Industry

      Agriculture
      Forestry, fish.,mining

      Construction

      Manufacturing,  total
        lumber & wood products
        primary & fab.  metal
        machinery
        transport, eqpt.
        other durables
        food & kindred
        printing & publishing
        textiles & apparel
        chemicals
        other non-durables

      Transportation
      Communication & utilities

      Wholesale trade
      Retail trade
      Financial, business,  repair
      Personal services
      Hospitals
      Education
      Other professional  services
      Public Administration
      Industry not reported

      Unemployed
      Total  Labor Force
          21

          31
          31
          10
          12
          36
          12
          38

          19

          30
           4

          13
         376

Doding
1,398
52
155
95
4

3

12
51
21
4


220
150
80
523
138
188
132
178
84
114
85
68
3,660
Twin
Falls
3,610
90
983
1,382
40
44
123
8
61
757
197
40
47
65
729
538
1,023
2,665
1,012
1,157
292
630
582
446
303
572
16,014
   74

   52
   22
                                      8
                                     14
   56
    8

   13
  316
   58
  671
   21
   86
   36
   66
   35

   99
2,009
  157

   31
              5
             16
             10
   78
   21

   16
  142
   49
   57
   16
   87
   81
   74
   17

   36
1,347
  244

  248
   11
    7
   30

    5
  168
    7

   13
    7

  168
   94

  175
  467
  138
  174
   63
  184
  109
  138
   70

  165
4,053
            'S.  Census  of Population,  1960

Minidoka
1,702
. 12
295
587
9
4
35

41
408
37

45
8
223
188
248
781
196
239
39
201
109
165
' 104
251
5,340

Cassia
1,602
13
440
837
13
9
48
4
25
598
71

10
59
179
167
238
1,027
206
300
23
313
150
223
196
268
6,182
Group I
Total
10,932
216
2,369
3,263
130
64
239
16
149
2,006
357
44
119
139
1,663
1,178
1,793
5,957
1,809
2,824
586
1,698
Iil51
1,256
814
1,472
^18,981

-------
                                                                           C-21
          Livestock, dairy products,  potatoes  and  sugar  beets  have  all

steadily increased as a proportion of total  agricultural  output.  Potatoes

and sugar beets, like wheat and hay,  lend themselves to  ready  cultivation  by

farm machinery;  and the labor requirements  of livestock grazing  are,  in general,

less than those of general crop farming.   As a consequence,  the number of  workers

engaged in farm labor has been dropping throughout the Upper Snake  Basin.   This

has been manifested not only in falling employment of full time and migratory

farm workers, but in consolidation of farms  to achieve optimum productivity

from use of farm machinery.  In Area  I the effects of this process  have been

offset to some extent by a large increase in farmland -  in Minidoka and Cassia

Counties alone 126,000 acres of irrigated land were brought  into  production

between 1949 and 1959.  High per-farm capitalization, high average  return  per

farm unit, and the availability of non-farm employment to supplement,  and  some-

times subsidize, farming have also acted to slow the drop in number of farm units

in this part of the Upper Snake Basin.

          Table VII summarizes some of the changes in the agricultural

economy of Area I between 1949 and 1959.   The effect of  increased productivity

is made dramatically obvious by contrasting the changes  in land harvested  (up

24.3%) and farm employment (down 14.9%) with the rise in value of crops sold

(up 84.5%). I/
]_/  Although shifting crop patterns may have played some part in the rise in
farm income, price changes were generally adverse.  The index of prices received
for all farm products declined from 258 in 1950 to 240 in 1959.   For all  crops
the decline was from 233 to 221, for meat animals from 340 to 313, for food
grains from 224 to 202, for feed grains and hay from 193 to 156.  (Statistical
Abstract of the U.S., 1960)  For Idaho farmers the decline was probably somewhat
greater, since average prices received were somewhat above the U.S.  average
during 1947-49, but were moderately below the average by 1961. (Economic Facts.
Idaho Agriculture, October 1962:  Agricultural Extension Service University of
Idaho, Boise.)

-------

-------
CM
1
C_J

Value Dairy
Pdts Sold
(1000 $)


1949
1959


Camas
28
30



Good ing Twin Falls
960
1,336

1,941
2,955



Blaine Lincoln
179
353

347
815


Jerome
553
1,345


Minidoka
609
1,509


Cassia
746
1,538


Area I
5,363
9,882

Total
Change
1949-59

84.2%

a/  U.S. Census of Agriculture, 1954, 1959.
b/  Includes Poultry and products, does not  include dairy products.

-------
                                                                            C-23
          Growth of food processing has been the most significant recent
economic development in Area I.   Providing over 60 percent of manufacturing
employment in 1960, food processing has supplied employment and income to off-
set the effect on the area of declining agricultural  employment.
          Until the late nineteen-fifties, a considerable part of the area's
food processing activity was small in scale - creameries, cheese plants, local
meat packers - and largely devoted to local markets.   Development of extensive
potato-processing has resulted in the appearance of a number of large plants
and very rapid industrial growth since about 1957.  Table VIII lists the major
food processing installations in Area I in the summer of 1962.
                                   TABLE VIII
                                 (on next page)

-------
                                                                            C-24
                                   TABLE VIII

                  AREA I:   AGRICULTURAL PROCESSING PLANTS,  1962  a/
Firm Name
Green Giant Co.
Pet Milk Co.
Smith's Dairy Products
B & L Meat Co.  •
Carter Packing Co.
Idaho Potato Processors
Pet Milk Co.
Young's Dairy Sales
Bryant's Packing Co.
Gibson Bros.
Burley Flour Mills
Shelley Processing Co.
J. R. Simplot & Co.
Ore-Ida Foods

Idaho Potato Processors
Great A&P Tea Co.
Idaho Hide & Tallow Co.
Amalgamated Sugar Co.
Kraft Foods Co.
Everybody's Packing Plant
Ohlinger Packing Co.
Gooding Hide & Tallow Co.
Jerome Potato Co.
Jerome Cooperative Creamery

Idaho Products, Inc.
Potato Products Corp.
Idaho Frozen Foods, Inc.
J. R. Simplot & Co.

Kraft Foods Co.
J. R. Simplot Co.
Amalgamated Sugar Co.
Kraft Foods Co.
Amalgamated Sugar Co.
Rocky Mountain Chemical Co.

Nelson Ricks Creamery Co.
Cannon Foods Co.
Jerome Cooperative Creamery
Swift & Co.
Young's Dairy Products
Cream Top Dairy
Location

Buhl
Buhl
Buhl
Buhl
Buhl
Burley
Burley
Burley
Burley
Burley
Burley
Burley
Burley
Burley

Burley
Burley
Burley
Burley
Carey
Gooding
Gooding
Gooding
Jerome
Jerome

Jerome
Jerome
Kimberley
Heyburn

Malta
Paul
Paul
Rupert
Rupert
Rupert

Richfield
Twin Falls
Twin Falls
Twin Falls
Twin Falls
Twin Falls
Product or Process

canned vegetables
condensed milk
cheese, ice cream
meat packing
meat packing
frozen potatoes
fluid milk
fluid milk
meat packing
meat packing
flour
dehydrated potatoes
froz. & dehyd. potatoes
frozen & dehydrated
    potatoes
frozen potatoes
frozen potatoes
hides and tallow
sugar
cheese
meat packing
meat packing
hides & tallow
dehydrated potatoes
fluid milk, butter,
   dairy specialty pdts
potato starch
potato starch
frozen potatoes
frozen potatoes
  potato starch
cheese
potatoes
sugar
cheese
sugar
potato alcohol, cattle
  feed
cheese
frozen vegetables
cheese, ice cream
cheese
cheese, ice cream
fluid milk
                            (continued on next page)

-------
                                                                     C-25
Table VIII (Continued)

Firm Name                        Location

Home Dairies, Inc.               Twin Falls
Idaho Creameries, Inc.           Twin Falls
Custom Packing Co.               Twin Falls
Independent Meat Co.             Twin Falls
York Packing Co.                 Twin Falls
Magic Valley Processing Co.      Twin Falls
Twin Falls Flour Mill            Twin Falls
Red River Starch Co.             Twin Falls
J. R. Simplot & Co.              Twin Falls
Twin Falls Starch Plant          Twin Falls
Idaho Frozen Foods               Twin Falls
Amalgamated Sugar Co.            Twin Falls
Idaho Hide & Tallow Co.          Twin Falls
Product or process

fluid milk
fluid milk
meat packing
meat packing
meat packing
potato starch
flour
potato starch
potato starch
potato starch
frozen vegetables
sugar
hides & tallow
a/  Sources:  Idaho Industrial Directory, 1960-61, Idaho State Chamber of
Commerce, Boise;  Atlas of the Pacific Northwest, 3d Edition (1962), Oregon
State University, Corvallis;  U. S. Bureau of Reclamation, Boise.

-------
                                                                            C-26
          By providing a ready market for agricultural  output, food
processing has influenced the agricultural  economy of the area.   Sugar beets
and potatoes, crops processed in the area,  have been produced in steadily
rising amounts.  Potato-processing, a relatively new development, has had a
particularly immediate effect on farming, with the major portion of new irri-
gated land in the Upper Snake Basin going into the production of that crop;
potato acreage in southern Idaho (the bulk of production originates east of
Twin Falls) increased from 200,000 acres in 1959 to 259,000 acres in 1962.1/
          The market for processed potatoes has grown steadily,  and
would appear to have caused greater consumption of potatoes, since shipments
of bulk potatoes have remained relatively unaffected by the development of
the processed product.  Because eastern Idaho has distinct advantages in
potato culture, producing a high yield of a superior product, a large part of
the national supply is produced in the region.  So rapid has been the rise in
demand for potato products that processors have been forced to ship in a part
of their needs from other states, in spite of the increased acreage devoted to
the crop in Idaho.  The Idaho Employment Security Agency has noted, in an un-
published report, that "in 1962 the potato processing industry claims to have
several hundred more employees than shown...for the whole (food processing)
group in 1960."  The speed with which potato processing has grown is suggested
in Table IX.
V  U. S. Bureau of Reclamation, Boise, Idaho.

-------
                                                                           C-27
                                    TABLE IX
                 GROWTH OF IDAHO POTATO PROCESSING,  1954 -  1962
Year

1954
1955
1956
1957
1958
1959
1960
1961
Idaho Crop
(1,000 CWT)
26,608
33,188
33,730
39,018
45,568
42,408
43,078
57,734
Processed
(1,000 CWT)
4,553
8,668
9.759
12,364
16,568
15,598
20,093
25,617
Processing as %
of Production
17.1
26.2
29.9
31.7
36.4
36.6
46.6
44.3
Imported
(1,000 CWT)
67
115
36
87
148
562
1,474
1,094
Processing as
% of 1954
100
191
214
273
365
343
442
563
          Area I, indeed the entire Upper Snake Basin, has an employment
and production pattern based on the agricultural cycle.   Food processing,  the
major manufacturing industry, also displays seasonal  characteristics, since it
is dependant on farm output for its raw materials.   To a considerable extent,
the patterns of activity in food processing and farming are interlocking
rather than conflicting.  The high point in food processing employment occurs
after the harvest, the low point during the summer, when agriculture is near
its seasonal employment peak.  Labor requirements of the two types of pro-
duction may,, to a considerable extent, be met from the same pool of farm
workers, since demands for labor coincide only during the September-October
harvest season, when food processing plants begin to operate near their high
range of output. This farm employment is high from April into October; while
peak-activity in food processing, as measured by employment, occurs in the
fourth quarter, tapers off moderately in the first quarter, and is low from
May to September.
a/  Idaho Potato Processing - 1961 Crop:  U. S. Dept. of Agriculture
Statistical Reporting Service, Boise, August, 1962.

-------
                                                                        C-28
          The chart on the following page presents  swings  in  food  processing
and agricultural  employment for the years 1960,  1961,  and  1962.  The  data,
drawn from the Idaho Employment Security Agency,  may overstate  the secular  de-
cline in agricultural employment,  since 1961  and  1962  estimates of agricultural
employment were made on a revised  basis, and  are  not strictly compatible with
1960.  It should be noted that the figures on the chart  refer to covered em-
ployment for the state as a whole, and not specifically  to either  Area I or
the Upper Snake Basin.  In spite of these deficiencies,  it is believed that
the charts portray rather faithfully the general  nature  of seasonal  forces  in
the major economic activities of the region.
                                    CHART
                               (on next page)

-------
                                                                                029
 AGRICULTURAL EL!?LOYiLi2iT    (in 1,000's)
FOOD. PROCESSING ElPLOKiS'iT    (in  1,000's)
                                                                                               r*
  i-•. c;'^^;l IT  r>ii \ p A ^.-p-? jro-n~"c ov T" • ::A  •. r'-'T'rri' /~;" o "•
  i-..-~>v...-.u  o...-iri.Xwi.-j/Lj.c)xJLVO v^^  i.y.-.:.u >._-..j.^/:Ji.it-rx^j
  curo-i:   Idaho E~ploy.-sr.t Sscui-ity Agency
                                                                                   //.sr
                                                                                   7.S"
                                                                      I

-------
                                                                        C-30
          Service activities grew moderately in Area I  of the Upper Snake
Basin during the decade 1950-1960.   While employment in production industries-
agriculture, mining, construction and manufacturing - declined 1.8 percent,
service employment rose 12.3 percent.  The rise was concentrated in Twin Falls,
the service center for the surrounding agricultural area, and in the food-
processing towns, Burley and Rupert.  Wholesals trade,  largely resting on
regional agricultural production, employed a significantly higher than average
portion of the labor force.  Transportation and utilities, too, absorb an un-
usually high part of the labor force - a result of both the need to ship in
most manufactured goods and of the transportation and warehousing requirements
of the agricultural product.  The concentration of retail and personal service
employment may be traced in part to the Sun Valley recreation area.
          Miscellaneous manufacturing activities showed distinct employment
growth.  Like services, the health of such industries is frequently a function
of population growth and urbanization:  as the size of  the local market grows,
markets become sufficient to permit production of previously imported items.
          Construction employment dropped, both as a percentage of the
labor force and in absolute terms, but remained somewhat above the national
average.  The presence of the main office of several large contracting firms
in Twin Falls is responsible in part for the high level of construction
employment.
          Table X indicates the trend of economic change, as reflected
in employment, between 1950 and 1960.
                                   TABLE X
                               (on next page)

-------
                                                                              C-31
                                         TABLE X

                          AREA I:   EMPLOYMENT TRENDS,  1950-1960
                              Employment
Employment as
% Labor Force
a/  U. S. Census of Population, 1950, 1960.

b/  includes the category 'hospitals'.

c/  includes the category 'forestry and fisheries'.
Percent Total
    Change
Industry
Agriculture
Mining
Construction
Manufacturing
lumber and pdts.
other durables
food & kindred
chemical
other non-durables
Transportation
Comtns & utility
IwPlesale trade
Retail trade
Fin. , bus. & repair
Personal service
Education
Other professional b/
Public Administration
Industry not reported £/
EMPLOYMENT
Unemployment
LABOR FORCE
1950
12,834
201
2,426

103
209
872
53
299
1,432
1,074
1,738
5,633
1,780
2,769
1,364
1,129.
1,051
528
35,495
1,432
36,927
1960
10,932
61
2,369

130
468
2,006
119
540
1,663
1,178 -
1,793
5,957
1,809
2,824
1,698
1,737
1,256
969
37,509
1,472
38,981
1950
34.8
.5
6.6

.3
. .5
2.3
.1
.8
3.9
2.9
4.7
15.2
4.8
7.5
3.7
3.0
2.8
1.4
96.1
3.9
100.0
1960
28.0
.2
6.1

.3
1.2
5.1
.3
1.3
4.2
3.0
4.6
15.3
4.6
7.2
4.3
4.4
3.2
2.5
96.2
3.8
100.0
1950 1960
-14.9
-70.0
- 2.6

26.2
123.9
130.0
124.5
80.6
16.1
9.7
3.1
5.7
1.6
1.9
24.5
53.7
19.5
83.3
5.6
2.8
5.5

-------
                                                                      C-32
          .3.   Area II
              Area II was the fastest growing  part of Idaho  during  the  1950-60
period.  Due.to the fast development of several  major industries, a diversified
economic base has been created, in which agriculture plays a far less  important
part than in other Upper Snake areas.  Table XI  lists employment by industry at
April, 1960 for each of the counties in the Area.   Table XVI describes  employ-
ment trends of the Area.
              Agriculture is the principal  user  of labor, with total employment
in 1960 exceeding that of all manufacturing.  A  steep (19.7%) decline  in employ-
ment in agriculture took place between 1950 and  1960, however, as a result of
the same complex of circumstances that affected  agriculture  in Area I.   Land in
farms and irrigation increased at about the same rate in both Area  I and Area II;
but farm consolidation took place at a much more rapid pace  in Area II, and
there was decidely more emphasis on grazing in Area II.   Potatoes and  sugar
beets were the principal sources of crop expansion;  but forage output also
rose and a collateral increase in cattle feeding occurred.   Long a  forage-
export area, eastern Idaho is beginning to exhibit a tendency to feed  a larger
number of cattle for longer periods of time, i/
              Table XII indicates some of the  changes in Area II agriculture
between 1949 and 1959.
V  County Agriculture Extension Agents in most  of the region actively pro-
mote this trend.  Several financial spokesmen  contacted during the  summer of
1962 felt that increased cattle feeding and meat packing would be the  area's
principal source of near term industrial growth.  Mr. S." M.  Meikle, Jr.,
president of the Idaho Falls Bank of Commerce, noted a fifty percent increase
in cattle feeding among his customers between  1961 and 1962.  Reports  of the
Department of Agriculture's Statistical Reporting Service indicated a  regular
month-to-month rise in comparative numbers of cattle on feed for the state as
a whole during 1962.

-------
co
oo
 I
                                                     TABLE XI

                              AREA II COUNTIES:  EMPLOYMENT DISTRIBUTION,  APRIL,  1960

                                                                                                          Group  II
Industry                            Butte     Bingham     Power     Bannock     Caribou      Bonneville       Total
Agriculture                           351       2,320       540         922         705           1,698      .   6,536
Forestry & fisheries                               10                    40           4               9           63
Mining                                              7                    51          42               8           108

Construction                          191         599        54       1,190         111           1,223         3,368

Manufacturing, total                  114       1,313        54       1,736         278           2,443         5,938
  lumber & wood pdts.                   8          20                    36                         54           118
  primary & fab. metal                  47                    91                         41           143
  machinery                                        44         3          99                         57           203
  transport, eqpt.                                 11                    26                          8           45
  other durables                                   50                   133                        180           363
  food & kindred                        4         764                   557          19             917         2,261
  printing & publishing                 4          51         5         162          12             217           451
  chemicals                            86         319        46         582         235             908         2,176
  other non-durables                    8          47                    50          12              61           178

Transportation                         21         458        86       2,948   ,       67             532         4,112
Communication & utilities    .          22          81        30         552         102             436         1,345

Wholesale trade                        38         405        31         558          31           1,096         2,159
Retail trade                          133       1,212       234       2,985         307           3,185         8,056
Financial, business, repair           132         577        55       1,254          66           2,090         4,174
Personal service                       39         543        56         962          98           1,126         2,824
Hospitals                              12         327        33         358          24             411         1,165
Education                              57         491        78       1,285         128             827         2;866
Other professional                     30         179        17         640          49             704         1,519
Industry not reported                  14         170        52         347           8             424         1,015
Public administration                  65         411        76         815          68             947         2,382
Unemployed                             79         389        35         867  .        126      .      715         2,211

Total Labor Force                   1,298       9,614     1,431      17,510        2,214         17,774       49,841
i/  -U.  S.^nsus of Population, 1960.

-------
                                                  TABLE  XII i/
                                AREA II COUNTIES:   AGRICULTURAL TRENDS,  1949

                             Butte    Bingnam
-1959
No. of Farms
Land in Farms
(acres)
Avg. Size/
Farms (acres)
Land Irrigated
(acres)
Land Harvested
(acres)
Grains " "
(1000 bushels)
Sugar beets "
(tons)
Potaotes " "
(1000 CWT)
Value crops
sold (1000 $)
Pasture
(acres)
Value livestock k/
sold (1000 $)
Value dairy pdts.
sold (1000 $)
/
1949
.1959
1949
1959
1949
1959
1949
1959
1949
1959
1949
1959
1949
1959
1949
1959
1949
1959
1949
1959
1949
1959
1949
1959

237
245
155,767
165,758
657.2
676.6
30,591
34,085
28,568
32,330
429
543
.7
227
426
856
1,554
102,813
112,142
1,191
1,447
75
82
2,158
1,985
585,720
998,752
271.4
503.1
157,981
225,892
175,185
203,860
2,317
3,833
68,338
92,961
4,331
8,515
11,743
23,222
304,997
690,092
5,870
9,307
1,860
2,329
388
339
408,325
411,978
1,052.4
1,215.3
10,868
26,915
146,184
139,487
2,455
2,612
1,822
11,641
175
995
4,187
5,616
88,842
102,355
699
1,656
148
182
i*r M i i i i w w '\
927
734
369,574
461 ,059
398.7
628.1
36,905
42,193
97,188
106,920
1,781
2,048
33,811
57,933
359
540
3,546
4,318
176,570
231,193
1,512
4,029
659
805
V^UI 1 UVJU
593
545
414,643
573,403
699.2
1,052.1
41 ,360
51,882
145,992
150,485
3,082
2,981
785
6,535
94
258
3,856
4,000
166,986
305,298
2,187
2,854
396 '
633
DUIUIKV MM
1,538
1,255
517,275
548,094
336.3
436.7
108,509
119,393
191,561
190,766
2,862
3,568
31,763
37,940
3,079
4,371
8,942
13,874
181 ,'435
190,544
3,644
5,175
908
. 1,594
3 area 11
5,841
5,103
2,451,324
3,159,044
419.8
619.0
386,574
500,360
784,678
823,848
12,926
15,585
137,179
207,010
8,266
15,107
33,131
52,584
1,021,643
1,631,624
15,104
24,467
4,047
5,626
Change
-12.6%
28.9%
47.4%
29.4%
4.9%
20.5%
50.9%
70.6%
58.7%
59.7%
61.9%
39.0%
I/  U. S. Census of Agriculture, 1954, 1959
b/_ Indues poultry and products does not include  dairy p^ucts.

-------
                                                                   C-35
          Growth of food processing has  been  pronounced.   Small  dairies,
creameries, and meat packing plants,  and the  steadily growing  sugar industry,
have been joined by the potato-processing industry to create a dramatic  increase
in food manufacturing.   While the potato and  sugar have  been major sources  of
growth in food processing over the last  decade,  meat  packing activities  are
beginning to rise, complimenting the increase in herds and cattle feeding,  and
may come to provide a third significant  source of food processing employment.  I/
Major food processing plants in Area II  are listed in Table XIII.
                               TABLE XIII
                             (on next page)
j7Although the competitive effects of price levels under different supply
circumstances exerts a cyclical pressure on Idaho feeding and slaughter,  there
has been a moderate upward trend in recent years.  For the first ten months of
1962 commercial livestock slaughter was six percent higher than in the same
period of 1961, compared to a two percent national  increase.

-------
                                                                                C-36
                                TABLE XIII !.

               AREA II:  AGRICULTURAL PROCESSING PLANTS, 1962
Firm Name
Kraft Foods Co.
Idaho Potato Growers, Inc.
Idaho Potato Starch Co.
Lost River Cheese Factory
Cherry Packing Plant
Hopkins Packing Co.
Johnson Packing House
Ray's Abbattoir
Blackfoot Creamery Co.
Howe11 Creamery Co.
Kraft Foods Co.
Idaho Potato Starch Co.
J. R. Simplot Co.
Utah-Idaho Sugar Co.
Gem Valley Swiss Cheese Co.
Grace Cheese Factory  ,
Idaho Falls Meat Co.
Jay's Processing Service
Location

Aberdeen
Aberdeen
Aberdeen
Arco
Blackfoot
Blackfoot
Blackfoot
Blackfoot
Blackfoot
Blackfoot
Blackfoot
Blackfoot
Blackfoot
Blackfoot
Grace
Grace
Idaho Falls
Idaho Falls
Rushton Bros. Custom Butchering  Idaho Falls
Taylor Meat Co.
Upper Snake River .Valley
  Dairymen's Assoc.
Yellowstone Dairy
All Star Dairy
Challenge Creamery
Cream Top Dairy
Dairyland
Eastern Idaho Dairy
Rocky Mt. Dairy Supply Co.
Rowland Bros. Dairy
Wallace Dairy
American Potato Co.
Idaho Potato Growers, Inc.
Midland Elevator Co.
Rogers Bros. Co.
Clement Bros. & Ball Bros.
Idaho Potato Starch Co.
Menan Starch Co.
Utah-Idaho Sugar Co.
Idaho Falls Animal Pdts. Co.
Kitchen Queen Food Products
People's Market
Swift & Co.
Idaho Falls
Idaho
Idaho
Idaho
Idaho
Idaho
Idaho
Idaho
Idaho
Idaho
Idaho
Idaho
Idaho
Idaho
Idaho
Idaho
Idaho
Idaho
Idaho
Idaho
Idaho
Falls
Falls
Falls
Falls
Falls
Falls
Falls
Falls
Falls
Falls
Falls
Falls
Falls
Falls
Falls
Fa Vis
Fails
Falls
Falls
Falls
Ppcatello
Pocatello
Product or process

cheese
frozen potatoes
potato starch
cheese
meat packing
meat packing
meat packing
meat packing
creamery butter
creamery butter
cheese
potato starch
dehydrated potatoes
beet sugar
cheese
cheese
meat packing
meat packing
meat packing
meat packing

creamery butter, fluid milk
cheese, ice cream, sp. dair
fluid milk
fluid milk
fluid milk
fluid milk
fluid milk
fluid milk
fluid milk
fluid milk
dehydrated potatoes
dehydrated & frozen potatoes
flour
potato flour
potato starch
potato starch
potato starch
beet sugar
grease & tallow
specialty foods
meat packing
meat packing

-------
                                                                         C-37
Table XIII (Continued)

Firm Name                     Location                     Product or process

Zwiegart Packing Co.          Pocatello                    meat packing
Idaho Creameries, Inc.        Pocatello                    ice cream, fluid milk
Cream Top Dairy               Pocatello                    fluid milk
Hopper Dairy                  Pocatello                    fluid milk
Rocky Mountain Dairy          Pocatello                    fluid milk
Rowland Bros. Dairy           Pocatello                    fluid milk
Clover Club Foods Co.         Pocatello                    specialty foods
Stanley's Better Food Pdts.   Pocatello                    specialty foods
Wattenbarger Meat Packer      Shelley                      meat packing
R.. T. Drench Co.              Shelley                      dehydrated potatoes
Rogers Bros. Co.              Shelley                      dehydrated potatoes,
                                                             potato starch
Utah-Idaho Sugar Co.          Shelley                      beet sugar
Soda Springs Creamery         Soda Springs                 creamery butter, fluid milk
a/  Sources:Idaho Industrial Director. 1960-61, Idaho State Chamber of
Commerce, Boise;  Atlas of the Pacific Northwest, 3d edition (1962), Oregon
State University, Corvallis, Oregon;  U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, Boise.

          Transportation stands second only to agriculture as a user of

labor in this part of eastern Idaho.  Although transportation employment dropped

about 16.5 percent between 1950 and 1960, it still occupied over eight percent

of the total Area II labor force in the latter year.  Pocatello, as the site

of Union Pacific yards, terminals and shops, the main office of Garrett Freight-

lines, and depots of six other truckers, represents the principal concentration

of transportation facilities in the State.  The city's location, at the inter-

section of the northern and southern routes through the Rockies, makes it a

natural gateway between the Pacific Northwest states and the East, and between

the northern Midwest states and California, Nevada, Utah and Wyoming; and it is

in its function of being the principal northern intra-mountain depot of the Union

Pacific that Pocatello received much of its early growth.  The falling level

of transportation employment does not reflect a drop in the city's importance

as a depot;  ra-ther, it must be related to national trends toward improved

-------
                                                                     C-38
efficiency and falling labor requirements by railroads.
          Pocatello is largely responsible, too, for the region's high level
of employment in education.  Idaho State College is located there.  Granting
degrees in Liberal Arts, Education, and Pharmacy, the school's 1961  enrollment
of 2,700 made it the largest educational institution in the eastern  Idaho-
Montana region.     >
          The principal impetus of growth in Area II in recent years has been
received from the chemical industry.  The phosphate industry and the AEC's Arco
Nuclear Reactor Project - based, respectively, on Pocatello and Idaho Falls -
each contributed to expansion of the Upper Sanke in probably the same measure
as did the growth of potato processing.
          The Idaho phosphate industry is located largely within Area II of
the Upper Snake Basin, and constitutes a significant part of the national phos-
phate industry.  In terms of physical output of phosphate rock, Idaho in 1960
provided 12.5 percent of the national total.
          The Upper Snake phospahte industry is built on extensive reserves
of phosphate-bearing materials in Bingham County, near the Fort Hall Indian
Reservation, and in Caribou County, near the town of Soda Springs which pro-
duce both elemantal phosphorus and fertilizers.  Table XIV liists the phosphate
operations in Area II.

                                TABLE XIV
                              (on next page)

-------
                                                                       C-39
                                  TABLE XIV

                     PHOSPHATE MINES AND PLANTS,  1960 a/

   Firm name                       Location                       Facility

   San Franciso Chemical  Co.        Caribou County                 mine
   J. R, Simplot Co.                Caribou County                 mine
                                   Bingham County (Fort Hall)      mine
                                   Bannock Cty.  (Pocatello)        fertilizer plant
   Monsanto Chemical  Co.            Caribou Cty.  (Soda Springs)     mine
                                   Caribou Cty.  (Soda Springs)     elemental  phosphorus
   FMC Co.                          Bannock Cty.  (Pocatello)        elemental  phosphorus
   a/  Bureau of Mines:  1960 Minerals Yearbook, Vol.  Ill

             Phosphate demand has grown rapidly since  World War II, spurred by

   greater use in fertilizers and by the soaring requirements of detergents pro-

   duction.   While national production has slowed somewhat in recent years - re-

   flecting the comparative maturity of phosphate-based products - the Idaho

   industry has continued to grow at a rate that, although somewhat uneven,

   approximates the ten percent growth rate experienced by the industry as a whole

   during the postwar period.  Table XV compares production of phosphate rock in

   Idaho and in the  United States during the period 1955-60.

                               TABLE XV

               PHOSPHATE ROCK PRODUCTION, 1955-1960 I/
      U. S.  Production   Change from   Idaho Production   Change from   Idaho as
Year  (1,000 long tons)  Year before   (1.000 long tons)  Year before   % of U.S.
1955 12,265
1956 15,747
1957 13,976
1958 14,879
1959 15,867
1960 17,516
a/ Minerals Yearbook,

27.6%
-10.9
6.5
6.8
10.0
Vol. Ill, 1958-1960:
1,330
1,438
1,307
1,291
1,610
2,177
Bureau

8.2%
-9.0
-1.5
24.8
35.2
of Mines
10.8
9.2
9.3
8.7
10.1
12.4

          The table indicates that the Idaho phosphate industry experi-

enced a 10.5 percent annual rate of growth during the period, compared to a

-------
                                                                      C-40
seven percent annual  rate natioanlly.   Since the cost of raw material  trans-
portation requires that the industry be an integrated one,  it may be assumed
that increases in phosphate rock production have been generally matched by
rising output of elemental phosphate and fertilizers - an assumption that is
reinforced by annual  additions to plant capacity among the  various processors.
Measured by employment in the chemical industry, production of elemental
phosphorus and fertilizers has advanced at a startling pace.   The 196 persons
engaged in the chemical industry in Bannock County in 1950  had grown to 582 in
1960.  In Caribou County the rise was from none to 235.  This, the two counties
experienced a combined rise in employment in the chemical industry on the order
of fifteen percent a year. —'
          While the greatest direct effect of the phosphate industry on
employment occurred in manufacturing, mining employment too has risen sub-
stantially.  Reports issued by the Idaho Employment Security Agency conflict
with the U. S. Census figures that indicate a drop in mining employment in
Bingham and Caribou Counties between 1950 and 1960. —'  Where the census
reported a total of 49 persons engaged in mining in the two counties in 1960,
the state agency reported an employment range for the year  of 80 to 144
(quarterly average employment).  In 1961 the range rose to  158 to 540.  Through
1961 and 1962, employment in mining in each of the two counties continued to
rise, with seasonally cyclical variations.
]_/  It should be noted, however, that the area's first elemental  phosphorus
plant was completed in 1949, so growth reflects the high rates characteristic
of an infant industry.
27  Idaho Labor Market, monthly, 1960 through November, 1962,  Boise.

-------
                                                                            C-41
             In distinction to the phosphate industry,  which  grew from a

natural resource, the Arco Nuclear Reactor Project appears  to have been

established in response to an absence of resources.   The  conflicting  require-

ments of the project, that its potentially dangerous  nuclear  reactors be will

away from areas of settlement, yet that its numerous  employees be provided with

adequate living circumstances, made its location an ideal one.  The various

reactor stations are spread about a rough triangle of arid  lava desert some

forty-two miles on its eastern boundary, narrov/ing from about thirty-one miles

along its southern base to about eleven miles at its  peak.  The town  of Arco,

eight miles from the western boundary of the project, is  the  nearest  settled

place.  Idaho Falls, where the administrative offices of  the  project  are

located, and where 75 percent of its employees are believed to reside, is

about twenty-five miles from its eastern boundary.

          The presence of the project, with employment of about 2,300 in

1962, together with the addition of construction employment resulting from

frequent expansion, has been enormously important to the  Idaho Falls  area.

Population has increased markedly in every town on the periphery of the

project, in distinction to the trend observed elsewhere in  the region for

rural towns to decline with declining farm populations. I/  Even more signifi-

cant than the raw increase in numbers has been the effect of  the infusion, into

the population of a large number of highly paid and highly  educated technicians.

Where the median income of families and unrelated individuals increased about

fifty percent in Pocatello, Twin Falls, and Boise.  It doubled between 1950.
]_/  Of the 16 Upper Snake Basin towns with 1950 populations under 1,000 that
grew between 1950 and 1960, no less than nine were located on the fringes of
the Arco Project; Manan, Ririe, Roberts in Jefferson County; Ammon, Irwin, Ucon,
lona in Bonneville County; Arco and Moore in Butte County.

-------
                                                                         C-42
and 1960 in Idaho Falls, to give the city the highest median  income  of any Idaho
incorporated place.  I/
          The effects of rapid growth of manufacturing in  Area  II  are
noticeable not only in the industries directly concerned and  in population,
but are manifested in the level  of employment in secondary industries.   Whole-
sale trade expanded markedly between 1950 and 1960 with the growth of  food
processing.  As in Area I, secondary manufacturing industries recorded employ-
ment gains well above the level  of population increase.  Retail trade  employment
increased at the same 2.4 percent annual rate as population.  Business and pro-
fessional services jumped far more sharply than population, reflecting increas-
ing urbanization and diversity of occupations and interest.  Table XVI lists
employment by industry in Area II at April 1950 and April  1960, to provide a
basis for assessing the nature of change in the economic base of the area.
]_/  U. S. Census of Population, 1950, 1960.
                                     TABLE XVI
                                   (on next page)

-------
                                                                               C-43
                                   TABLE XVI
                    AREA II:  EMPLOYMENT TRENDS, 1950-1960 &
                                                           a/
Industry

Agriculture

Mining

Construction

Manufacturing
  lumber and pdts.
  other durables
  food & kindred
  chemical & allied
  other non-durable

Transportation
Comctns & utility

Wholesale trade
Retail trade
Fin. Bus. & repair

Personal service
Education
Other professional £/
Public admin.
Industry not reported £/

EMPLOYMENT

Unemployment

LABOR'FORCE
a/  U. S. Census of Population, 1950, 1960.
b/  of discussion on page 40.
c/  Includes category  'hospitals'.
d/  Encludes category  'forestry & fisheries'
Employment
1950 1960
8,142
164
3,211
128
310
1,096
237
458
4,921
1,001
1,567
6,332
2,049
2,264
1,630
1,586
1,459
517
37,072
1,875
38,947
6,536
108k/
3,368
118
754
2,261
2,176
629
4,112
1,345
2,159
8,056
4,174
2,824
2,866
2,684
2,382
1,078
47,630
2,211
49,841
Employment as
% Labor Force
1950 1960
20.9
.4
8.3
.3
.8
2.9
.6
1.2
12.6
2.6
4.0
16.3
5.3
5.8
4.2
4.1
3.8
1.3
95.2
4.8

13.1
.2
6.3
.2
1.5
4.5
4.3
1.3
8.2
2.7
4.3
16.1
8.4
5.6
5.7
5.4
4.8
2.2
95.6
4.4

Percent
Total
Change
1950-60
-19.7
-34.2k/
4.9
-7.8
143.2
106.1
819.0
37.3
-16.4
34.4
37.7
27.4
103.4
24.8
76.0
68.6
63.2
108.4
28.6
18.4
28.1

-------
                                                                        C-44
          4.  Area III
              Table XVII lists employment by industry categories  for each
Area III county at April, 1960.   Table XX describes employment trends for  the
area.
              Agriculture is the chief employer of labor in this  sparsely
settled area, occupying 32.6 percent of the labor force in  1960,  the highest
level of agricultural specialization in the Upper Snake Basin. The prevailing
trends to farm consolidation, extension of irrigation, and  shifting of crop
emphasis to potatoes that marked other parts of the basin were also prevalent
in Area III during the last decade.   But  though the underlying trends v/ere
the same, the area's high level  of dependence on agriculture made their
effects more extreme.  Agricultural  employment fell 22.4 percent, and the
area's population was scarcely changed during the ten-year  period.   Additions
to farm land were far more moderate than in other parts of  the basin;  and
extension of irrigation was more apt to take the form of putting  water on
dry-farmed land than of bringing new land under cultivation.  Increased
grazing was less noticeable than in Area I and Area II, even though much of
Teton, Clark, and Fremont Counties is mountainous and not suited  to other
agricultural pursuits.  Such additon to grazing land and herds as did occur
was often devoted to dairy-farming;  between 1949 and 1959  salies  of dairy
products rose from 6.8 percent of the value of farm products sold to nine
percent of a substantially higher value of products sold.  Table  XVIII lists
changes in the agricultural economy of the area.
                                TABLE XVII
                              (on next page)

-------
un
sf
 I
Industry

Agriculture
Forestry, fish., mining

Construction

Manufacturing, total
  lumber & wood pdts.
  primary & fab. metal
  machinery & tsptn. eqpt.
  other durables
  food & kindred
  printing & publishing
  chemical
  other non-durables

Transportation
Communications & utilities

Wholesale trade
Retail trade
Financial, bus., repair

Personal services
Hospitals
Education
Other professional
Public administration
Industry not reported

Unemployed

Total Labor Force
                       TABLE XVII

AREA III COUNTIES:  EMPLOYMENT DISTRIBUTION,  APRIL,

                                           Fremont
                                              836
                                               23

                                              171

                                              165
                                               58
                                                5
                                               72
                                                9
                                                5
                                               12

                                              186
                                               67

                                              220
                                              424
                                               87

                                              160
                                               53
                                              196
                                               46
                                              137
                                               70

                                              116

                                            2,957
Jefferson
1,413

299
336
8
4
12
8
197
18
77
12
136
53
222
513
283
190
53
197
87
141
67
134
4,124
Madison
987

202
140
12

12
15
86
12

3
159
82
192
495
163
184
27
368
74
124
45
137
3,379
Teton
408
3
26
61
12



39
10

..
21
11
26
80
24
31
13
92
4
34
23
25
882
Clarl
167
15
6









12

3
26
3
13

31

37
14
26
353
1960 *

  Area Total

    3,811
       41

      704

      702
       90
        4
       24
       28
      394
       49
       82
       27

      514
      213

      663
    1,538
      560

      578
      146
      884
      211
      473
      219

      438

   11,695
aj - U. S. Census of population, 1960.

-------
(O
                                                        TABLE XVIII


No. of Farms

Land in Farms
(acres)
Avge. Size/Farms
(acres)
Land Irrigated
(acres)
Land Harvested
(acres)
Grains "
(1000 bushels)
Sugar beets "
(tons)
Potatoes " "
(1000 CWT)
Value crops sold
(1000 $)
Pasture
(acres)
Value livestock!!'
sold (1000 $)
Value dairy pdts.
sold (1000 $)
a/ -u. S. AMISUS of
b/ Incluc^P poultry


1949
1959
1949
1959
1949
1959
1949
1959
1949
1959
1949
1959
1949
1959
1949
1959
1949
1959
1949
1959
1949
1959
1949
1959
AREA
Jefferson
1,255 "
1,134
311,576
340,616
248.4
300.4
101,852
136,555
104,150
126,240
1,292
2,209
14,236
12,250
1,692
3,509
5,062
10,857
160,853
170,858
2,770
3,800
730
1,690
Agriculture, 1954,
and products, does
III COUNTIES: AGRICULTURAL TRENDS, 1949-1959 2J
Madison
891
682
•317,920
357,361
356.8
526.8
58,688
66,043
112,249
110,325
1,760
2,459
6,318
11,807
1,271
..1,887
4,655
7,017
123,571
159,282
1,870
2,406
462
1,095
Teton
459
399
198,282
199,988
432.0
501.2
33,152
35,972
76,378
67,188
849
1,021


168
164
1,465
1,555
68,146
84,517
1,175
1,342
341
555
1959 .
not include dairy
Clark
84
61
244,633
212,083
2,912.3
3,476.8
9,453
10,374
17,518
15,710
115
187


34
66
229
441
222,019
187,175
1,335
709
25
17
pr^Rcts.
Fremont
832
740
362,088
411,310
435.2
555.8
61,268
67,656
117,826
107,466
1,795
2,346
656
2,084
1,432
2,356
5,225
7,620
161,413
218,909
1,709
3,535:
305
501

Area III
3,521
3,016
1,434,679
1,521,358
407.4
504.4
264,413
316,600
428,121
426,929
5,811
8,221
21,210
26,141
4,597
8,982
16,636
27,221
736,002
820,741
8,859
11,793
1,862
3,857

Change
-14.3%


6.0%

23.8%

19.7%

-.2%

41.4%

23.2%

95.3%

63.6%

11.5%

• 33.1%

107.1%


-------
                                                                           C-47
          Food processing has not displayed the same extensive growth




in Area III that it has in other parts of the Upper Snake Basin.   The region is




smaller, both geographically and in population, and its agricultural output is




less than that of Area I or Area II.  Cheese producers at Ashton,  St. Anthony,




Rine, Rexburg (two plants), Richfield, and Victor represented the  main sources




of food processing employment prior to 1961, and help to explain the emphasis




on dairying in the area.  The emplacement of potato-processing plants in Rexburg




and Lewisville in 1961 represented a major addition to manufacturing in the




area, though the former plant closed after a single season of operation.  Table




XIX lists major food processing plants in Area III.
                                    TABLE XIX




                                 (on next page)

-------
                                                                             C-48
                                    TABLE XIX £
                 AREA III:  AGRICULTURAL PROCESSING PLANTS,  1962
Firm Name
Ashton Cheese Factory
Engberson Creamery
Teton Valley Power & Milling Co.
Fresh-Pak Potatoes, Inc.
Parker Potato Corp.
Remington & Sons
Pelton Meat Co.
Nelson Ricks Creamery Co.
Upper Snake River Valley
  Dairymen's Assn.
Rogers Bros, Co.

St. Anthony Starch Co.
Clay Rushton
Stowell Dairy
Utah-Idaho Sugar Co.
Kraft Foods Co.
Ruthardt Slaughter House
Hopperdietzel Cheese Factory
St. Anthony Flour Mills
St. Anthony Starch Co.
Nelson Ricks Creamery Co.
Location

Ashton
Driggs
Driggs
Lewisville
Parker
Parker
Rexburg
Rexburg

Rexburg
Rexburg

Rexburg
Rigby
Rigby
Rigby
Ririe
St. Anthony
St. Anthony
St. Anthony
St. Anthony
Victor
Product or process

cheese, ice cream
fluid milk
flour
dehydrated potatoes
canned potatoes
canned potatoes
meat packing
cheese, fluid milk

cheese, fluid milk
frozen & dehydrated
  potatoes
potato starch
meat packing
fluid milk
beet sugar
cheese
meat packing
cheese
flour
potato starch
cheese, fluid milk
a./  Sources:  Idaho Industrial Director, 1960-61, Idaho State Chamber of
Commerce, Boise:  Atlas of the Pacific Northwest, 3d edition (1962), Oregon
State University, Corvallis, Ore.;  U. S. Bureau of Reclamation, Boise.
          There is in Area III a high relative level of employment in

education, due to the presence of Ricks College, a two-year Latter Day Saints

school in Rexburg, and a state vocational training school in St. Anthony.

          Manufacturing, other than food-processing, is of negligible

importance in the area, though some growth of lumbering, based on the timber

of Targhes National Forest, h-.s occurred very recently.  Service employment

constitutes an exceptionally high proportion of total employment for an agri-

cultural area.  This may be attributed in part to the presence of Ricks

College and in part to the proximity of Yellowstone National Park.  The route

-------
                                                                           C-49
to the western entrance to Yellowstone passes through the main towns of Area

III, and tourist expenditures contribute substantially to the service activi-

ties of the region, i/

          The development of the regional employment pattern has been un-

eventful, as suggested in Table XX on the following page.  Falling farm employ-

ment has been replaced by service occupations and growth of food processing.  A

modest net gain in number of jobs has been paralleled by the entry of women

into the labor force - largely in food processing occupations - with the net

result being little change in population, but some rise in family income.



                                 TABLE XX

                              (on next page)
I/  In 1962 (season ends in September) a record 1,889,516 persons visited
Yellowstone.  Although no measure of the income derived by this part of Idaho
from tourists is known to exist, residents are well aware of the importance of
tourism.  Grocers in Rexburg and St. Anthony indicated in interviews that almost
half of their trade occurred from June to September; motel operators suggested
over 75%.  The town barber in St. Anthony declared that tourists carried him
through the summer school vacation period, when many mothers cut their children's
hair.  And the manager of the St. Anthony branch of the First Security Bank of
Idaho revealed an interesting personal index of tourism:  residents of the area
prefer silver dollars, so excess paper currency is shipped to Federal Reserve
Banks.  For several years such shipments have been more than twice as high
during the summer months as during the rest of the year.

-------
                                                                       C-50
                                 TABLE XX
                   AREA III:  EMPLOYMENT TRENDS,  1950-60 -'
                                                         a/
                                  Employment
Employment as
% Labor Force
Industry

Agriculture

Mining

Construction

Manufacturing
  lumber & pdts.
  other durable goods
  food & kindred .
  chemical & allied
  other non-durable

Transportation
Communications & utilities

Wholesale trade
Retail trade
Financial, bus., repair

Personal service
Education
Other professional W
Public administration

Industry not reported £/

EMPLOYMENT

Unemployment

LABOR FORCE
1950
4,912
11
632
80
46
188
4
48
433
220
.506
1,360
377
452
575
255
328
242
10,669
289
10,958
1960
3,811
0
704
90
56
394
82
80
514
213
663
1,538
560
578
884
357
473
260
11,257
438
11,695
1950
44.8
.1
5.8
.7
.4
1.7
.4
3.9
2.0
4.6
12.4
3.4
4.1
5.2
2.3
3.0
2.2
97.4
2.6
100.0
1960
32.5
0
6.1
.8
.5
3.3
.7
.7
4.4
1.8
5.6
13.1
4.8
4.9
7.5
3.0
4.0
2.2
96.3
3.7
100.0
Change
-22.4%
.-100.0%
11.4
12.5
21.8
109.0
1,950.0
66.6
18.7
-3.8
31.0
13.1
48.6
27.9
53.7
40.0
44.2
7.4
5.5
51.6
6.7
a./  U. S. Census of Population, 1950, 1960
b/  Includes category 'hospitals'
cj  Includes category 'forestry & fisheries'.

-------
                                                                         C-51
III.  GROWTH POTENTIALS AND FORECAST

      A.  Factors Influencing Future Growth

          1.  Underlying Assumptions

              In the absence of a larger framework of study, a number of broad

assumptions about the national economy must be included in any forecast of

regional economic activity.  The projections included in this report are based

on these assumptions:

              (a)  National population dimensions will be consistent with the

U. S. Bureau of Census projection, Series II.  It should be noted that Series II

is the higher of the two population projections which are now considered to be

most probable.

              (b)  National output per person (i.e. gross national product per

capita in constant dollars) will continue to rise at the 1.4 percent rate which

has characterized U. S. production in this century.

              (c)  The employment act of 1946 will continue to be funda-

mental of domestic policy, and employment will generally include 96 percent

of the civilian labor force.

              (d)  A continuing rise in productivity will be balanced by

shorter average working hours, later entry into, and earlier retirement from

the labor force;  this employment as a percentage of population will be un-

changed from 1960, in spite of additional entry of women into the labor force..!/

              (e)  Social and political conditions are assumed to be sub-

stantially the same as in 1960.  Thus there is no provision for either major
iy  This may be a question-begging assumption.  The possibility of very rapid
increases in productivity may carry the prospect of radical shrinkage of em-
ployment, and the need to develop new techniques of income distribution.  Such
questions are well beyond the scope of this study.

-------
                                                                         C-52
war or a final end to international tensions;  it is felt that increasing urban-

ization will continue to result in greater employment by service industries,

and that federal government policies will continue to be crucial to the de-

velopment of Idaho. A/                        ,

              2.  Agriculture

                  In the future the relative importance of agriculture will de-

cline in the Upper Snake Basin, continuing a trend in force for a number of

years.  But though agriculture will account for a smaller part of total employ-

ment and income, due to the growth of industrial and service activities, agri-

cultural output will continue to increase through application of superior

techniques and through addition to farm land.

                  Extension of irrigation may be expected to slow as the

arable areas possessing adequate water become increasingly utilized.  To 1985,

Bureau of Reclamation efforts should provide 50,000 to 55,000 added areas of

irrigated land.  Individual farmers, pumping ground water, should provide an-

other 300,000 acres, with Jefferson, Madison and Bormeville Counties probably

somewhat faster in adding to irrigation than other parts of the basin.  Be-

tween 1985 and 2010 individual farm irrigation extensions may be expected to

become far less significant due to the rising costs, and relative scarcity

of, available water.  The combination of a larger population with a fixed

supply of arable land should require more ambitious water interchange projects

and the Bureau of Reclamation may be assumed to bring another 135,000 to

140,000 acres underirrigation, with a much smaller addition by individuals. ?J
I./  Over  64%  of  Idaho's  land  in  federally owned and governmental policies have
long  played an important part in the  circumstances of the state.  Just as the
Bureau  of Reclamation, defense installations and  the Arco Project affect cur-
rent  economy, so federal policies relating  to  the use of water, national forest
land, and electric power with influence  the rate  of future development.
2J  Material  derived  from  interviews  with county  agents and Bureau of Reclama-
tion  personnel,  the Bureau of Reclamation-Corps of Engineers report Upper Snake
Basin,  Summary Report, Vol. I (1961), and unpublished paper of Kenneth Johnson,
Bureau  of Reclamation economist  at Boise.

-------
                                                                         C-53
                  Crop patterns in the area are anticipated to develop along




already defined lines, reflecting a greater relative consumption of meat,  dairy




products, vegetables and processed foods, and the lower usage of grains and




bulk commodities consistent with rising national living standards.   The high




comparative rate of western population growth will give direction to crop  compo-




sition.  This markets for poultry and dairy products - which are largely shipped




to California - should expand rapidly.  Similarly, it is reasonable to antici-




pate greater concentration on meat animals and animal feeding as regional




markets become more capable of absorbing the cattle (and, indirectly, the




forage) now shipped to the midwest.  Production of sugar beets, quota-controlled




and sold in national markets, is anticipated to increase at a rate consistent




with national population growth.  Potato production is expected to increase




at about the same rate as population to 1985.  Forage output and irrigation of




pasture are both expected to grow as a function of increased grazing.  Gains in




these areas will be partially accomplished by diverting land from production of




grain.




                  Farm consolidation is expected to continue.  Its effect on




number of farms, however, should be much less between 1960 and 1985 than in the




nineteen=fifties.  Increased irrigation, attainment of optimum size by a grow-




ing number of farm units as consolidation proceeds, and increased availability




of non-farm employment to supplement agricultural income, should all act with




the high price of farm land to brake the pace of decline in number of farms.




                  Kenneth Johnson, Bureau of Reclamation economist, has pre-




dicted that between 1960 and 1980 the number of farms in all of southern Idaho




will decline about 9.5 percent.  Applying this percentage to the study area, a





reduction in number of farm units from 15,496 in 1959 to about 14,000 in 1980

-------
                                                                       C-54
may be presumed.  (The actual experience of the area between 1949 and 1959,




the era of rapid farm consolidation, saw the number of farms decrease at 80 per-




cent of the rate for all of southern Idaho, due to large additions of irrigated




acreage in Cassia and Minidoka Counties.)




               Unlike the 1950 to 1960 period, farm employment may be ex-




pected to fall less sharply than numbers of farms.  The increased size and




complexity of farms has already begun to create a body of full time farm




laborers - notably farmers experienced in irrigation cropping on shares on




newly irrgiated portions of predominantly dry farms, and specialists who per-




form specific functions for a number of similar farms.  Although the improve-




ment in productivity 'of agricultural labor has been based to a considerable




extent on the organization of land to permit use of constantly larger farm




machinery, it is not unreasonable to assume that rising population and in-




creasing scarcity of high quality agricultural land will necessitate increas-




ingly greater attention to the mechanics of soil conservation and to raising




productivity per acre.  More intensive agricultural practices would be expected




to -require labor utilization greater than that indicated by recent trends.




It is assumed for design purposes that farm employment will decline seven per-




cent - 75 percent of the rate predicted for number of farms - between 1960 and




1985.  Applying this rate of decline to each sub-area, farm employment in 1985




would amount to 10,300 in Area I, 6,000 in Area II, 3,500 in Area III, a total




of 19,800 in the Upper Snake Basin.




               Gauging the employment level for agriculture in 2010 is




based on:  (1) a continuing evolution of the organizational framework and




technology of agriculture which is likely to result in a type of farm skin to




the manufacturing firm, (2) greater labor specialization, (3) shorter working

-------
                                                                      C-55
hours.  For the purposes of this paper it is assumed that as  a result of rising
productivity employment in agriculture will  be the same in 2010 as in 1985,
with the required greater output of crops attainable from an  equal input of
labor, and a slightly greater input of land  than anticipated  for 1985.
          3.  Food Processing
              Food processing in the study area may be expected to continue
to grow vigorously in the future, though the rate of growth will drop below  the
high rate of the last few years.  Potato processing, the major contributor to
recent rapid growth, has passed the stage of infant industry  expansion.   Potato
products appear to be largely established, with no substantial untapped  markets
remaining, and future increases in output are expected to relate more closely
to national population trends.
              Because potato processing requires a potato of  excellent quality,
and because the soil and climate of eastern Idaho are peculiarly suited  to
growing potatoes, the region should continue to provide a large part of the
total national output of processed potatoes.  Given sufficient water, a  large
part of the land in the basin is suited to growing potatotes, and no restrictions
on supply of the product appear likely during the study period.  Increased uti-
lization of culls and development of additional by-products is expected to
continue, and employment is forecast to increase at a two percent average rate -
slightly higher than the projected rate of national population increase.  An
estimated 3,000 persons were employed by the industry in the Upper Snake Basin
in 1962; and application of the forecast growth rate indicates employment of
4,300 in 1985, 7,100 in 2010.  On the basis of present plant locations about
50 percent of potato processing employment would be concentrated in Area I,
15 percent in Area III, and 35 percent in Area II.  It would  appear logical,

-------
                                                                       C-56
however, for expansion to take place relatively faster in the eastern portions
of the study area, where the greatest potato production and potentials actually
exist.  Giving some weight to this in distributing potato processing employ-
ment for design purposes, Are I employment is assumed to rise to 2,000 persons
in 1985, 3,100 in 2010;  Area II employment would amount to 1,800 in 1985,
3,200 in 2010;  Area III employment is forecast to be 500 in 1985, 800 in 2010.
              As potato processing grows, further evening of the cyclical
production pattern may be anticipated.  Larger, possibly fewer, units will be
in the position of weighing storage costs for raw materials against the costs
of uneven production flows and storage of the finished product.  With the higher
future output envisaged for processed potatoes, handling of the physical product
and adjusting output to markets would appear to require a constant approach to
relatively steady, year-round production schedules.
              Meat packing is expected to expand considerably in the future,
as the Idaho industry develops from a localized one and increases shipments of
meat  products to the Pacific Coast areas, particularly California, where the
"state now sends large numbers of cattle on the hoof.  A surplus of forage, and
growing  population on the Pacific Coast, offer conditions favorable to develop-
ment  of  the  industry; and the national tendency has been for an increasing
portion  of the total output of meat products to be processed in the areas
where cattle are grazed.  Two large packing plants in Pocatello (Swift & Co.
and Zweigart Packing) will be joined  in 1963 by a plant of Stockmen's Meat
Corporation  in Jerome capable of slaughtering up to 400 head a day and of
employment of up to 200 persons.  With conditions not unlike those applying
to potato .processing in its early stages, the immediate expansion of meat
packing  is anticipated to be swift.  EmDlovmpnt •  c      ^ ^            *•
                                     employment 1S forecast to grow at a five

-------
                                                                     C-57
percent annual rate to about 1970,  slowing to the two  percent  rate  of western
population growth thereafter.   Growth is expected to be  shared equally  be-
tween Area I and Area II, the former having some advantage  of  location  with
reference to grazing areas;  the latter, because of Pocatello, possessing trans-
portation advantages.  Employment is projected to increase  from a total  of
about 400 in the entire basin to 400 persons engaged in  meat packing  in both
Area I and Area II in 1985, and about 700 in each of the two areas  in 2010.
             About 3,000 persons were employed in other  types  of food pro-
cessing in the region in 1960, and although growth may be expected  to be
concentrated in potato processing and meat packing, some growth of  other pro-
cessing activities will also take place.  It is to be  anticipated,  however,
that growth will be somewhat  less than that of population. Nationally, employ-
ment in food processing between 1950 and 1960 rose at  144 percent of  the rate
of. population.  This, reflecting the trends to greater use  of  packaged  foods
in national markets, which contributes to specialization of production, un-
questionably acts to slow the growth of processors mainly serving local areas.
Thus, the number of local confectioners, bakers, bottlers,  etc. in  the  Upper
Snake Basin is not expected to expand at the same rate as population.
             The production of dairy products, sugar,  and grain products,
which the area produces for larger markets, has been characterized  by in-
creased output without equivalent increases in employment.   For instance,  in
spite of a rise in output of sugar on the order of three percent a  year be-
tween 1950 and 1960, southern Idaho employment in sugar  manufacturing has  re-
mained surprisingly constant at something over 900 persons. Similarly, em-
ployment in dairy products industries is believed to have declined  over the
same period, in spite of a considerable increase in values  added by manufacture,

-------
                                                                    C-58
due to concentration of production in larger plants.   Assuming  that growth  of
employment occurs at 65 percent of the rate of population  growth assumed for
the nation, employment in food processing other than  potato  products and meat
packing would amount in 1985 to 1,900 in Area I, 1;700 in  Area  II,  450 in Area
III.  Employment in 2010 would be 2,600 in Area I,  2,300 in  Area II, 600 in
Area III.
              Because of the nature of the underlying assumption with regard
to productivity, the forecast for output of processed foods  is  in the same
general terms as the forecast for food processing employment.   Output of pro-
cessed potatoes, growing at a two percent average annual rate,  should amount
from roughly 1.3 million pounds in 1960 to about 2.1  million pounds in 1985
and 3.2. million pounds in 2010.  Production of beet  sugar should grow at the
same rate as national population, from an estimated 310 thousand pounds in  1960
to about 490 thousand pounds in 1985, 730 thousand pounds  in 2010.   Cattle
slaughter capacity should rise to roughly 1600 head per day in  1985, 2,800
head per day in 2010.  Aggregating all other food processing,  output should rise
at less than 1.5 percent per year - about two-thirds  the rate of national popu-
lation growth.  Though some products, particularly dairy products,  may experience
expansion, it would appear likely that the agricultural output  of the region
will be channeled increasingly into sugar, potatoes,  and cattle, and that
growth of    ,   products will be diminished as a result of this specialization.
           4.  Phosphate
               The level of development of the phosphate industry is a
crucial consideration in assessing growth of the Upper Snake Basin.  Demand
for phosphate has increased at a better than ten percent average annual rate
since World War II; and though maintenance  of such a rate is unlikely,, due to

-------
                                                                         C-59
the growing base, and maturity of demand for many products,  a considerable rise

may still be anticipated.  A number of estimates of growth have been made;  The

U. S. Department of Commerce has projected a 4.5 percent rate of increase in

output from 1960 to 1980.1/  The Corps of Engineers in a 1958 report (probably

compiled in 1956) forecast a 3.4 percent rate between 1955 and 1980.^/  An inde-

pendant consulting firm, Ivan Bloch & Associates, has projected a 4.3 percent

national rate from 1960 through 1985, with a rate above 5.5 percent for the

Idaho industry under circumstances presuming a dependable supply of low cost

electric power.3/

              Such estimates, based on the level of use of end-products uti-

lizing phosphorus - detergents, fertilizers, Pharmaceuticals, explosives, fungi-

cides, pesticides - largely ignore the possibility of new products.  Should the

price and availability of the resource permit its use as a building block in

synthesizing new products, even faster growth would appear reasonable.  In view

of the intensity of product research characteristic of the chemical industry,

it would appear defensible, then, to forecast national growth to 1985 on the

basis of the more recent forecasts, the 4.5 percent rate projected by the

Commerce Department and  Ivan Bloch & Associates.

              To what extent the Idaho phosphate industry is able to share

in this growth depends on its success in overcoming some competitive dis-

advantages  inherent in its location.  Established near the natural resource,

the  industry must overcome the weight of freight costs in dealing with the
I/  Current Industrial Reports, Inorganic Chemicals, Series M28A.
tj  Mater Resources Development. Columbia River Basin, Vol. Ill
3/  Direct Testimony  in Support of Amended Application for License (before
the Federal Power Commission)Washington Public Power Supply System;
Kennewick, Washington;  September, 1960.

-------
                                                                      C-60
largest markets for its product - the east coast and industrial  middle west for
industrial chemicals, the midwest for fertilizers.   For this reason, discovery
of substantial commercially utilizable phosphate deposits closer to major
markets could impede the growth of the Idaho industry.
              Several factors suggest easing of this disadvantage.   Growth
of population in the far west should carry with it the establishment of phos-
phorus using industries, potential customers with who Idaho producers would
have a natural advantage.  Also tied to western population growth is the possi-
bility of gradual changes in freight rates which, while not great enough to
eliminate Idaho's disadvantage in eastern markets, could nevertheless materially
extend the effective marketing area.  A process under development may result
in making metallurgical coke, required in the electric furnace production of
phosphorus, available from low grade western coal.  Shipment of coke from sub-
bituminous deposits near Kemmerer, Wyoming, the siteof the FMC co., experi-
ental coking plant, costs less than $5.00 a ton in freight charges, compared
to an average of $12.50 a ton from established sources; and southern Idaho
plants use 200,000 tons a year at 1960 production levels.
              More significant than any of these in assessing growth of
the Idaho phosphate industry is the possible availability of supplies of low
cost electric energy.  The electric furnace process for producing elemental
phosphorus requires large amounts of electric power to combination with phos-
phate rock and coke.  In the production of 50 tons a day of phosphorus
600,000 to 700,000 kwh are utilized.  In these quantities electricity can be
thought of as a basic raw material; and at the present level of cost to
Upper Snake phosphate producers (believed to average about 5.5 mills per kwh),
electricity represents about a quarter of total production costs.  In terms

-------
                                                                       C-61
of freight rate equivalents, each one mill  reduction in the cost of electricity

for each one mill increase in cost to competitors) increases the effective

marketing area eastward by something over 200 miles.  In the future low cost

supplies of electirc power - from Snake River and Columbia River dams and

from nuclear sources - may become available to this area.   Should this increased

supply bring the cost of power below the equivalent costs of added conventional

thermal power in other regions, the phosphate industry would be a primary bene-

ficiary.

          While the growth trends for phosphate products is forecast to

flatten out between 1985 and 2010, relating more closely to population levels

rather than expansionary forces of both population and new product development,

the western phosphate industry is expected to be able to continue its growth

at a rate somewhat  in excess of that for over-all phosphate output.  Population

growth in the far west is anticipated to continue to exceed that of the nation

as a whole, with a consequent gain in western manufacturing industries.

Oriental, and some Latin American, export markets for phosphate products, par-

ticularly fertilizers, may be more advantageously served by western producers.

Since these markets should grow faster than any others, due to their largely

underdeveloped  character and deficiencies in food output, they represent a

reservoir of important latent demand.I/  Still another source of future demand

is the possibility of use of commercial fertilizers to stimulate western forest

growth.  Although present circumstances do not permit economic use of intensive
]/   In  1958 total domestic output of fertilizers in Latin America amounted to
1.9  kg  per person, 3.7 kg per hectare of arable land.  In the far east - ex-
cluding Communist Asia and Japan - production amounted to .3 kg per person, 2.2
per  hectare.  In contrast, U.S. production amounted to 38.8 kg per capita, 32.4
kg per  hectare. (U.S. Dept. of Agriculture:  World Food Budget, 1962 and 1966.
Washington, D.C., October, 1961.

-------
                                                                         C-62

tree fertilization, the forest products  industries  have  demonstrated  a  recent
tendency to look ahead to larger markets within  a context of limited  tree-
bearing land, and have devoted some attention  to increasing  the  growth  /rate
of forests.I/  For these reasons, growth of the  Idaho  phosphate  industry  is
forecast to be on the order of one and a half  times national  population growth,
or 2.7 percent per year, in the period 1985 to 2010.
           In terms of employment, the forecast growth rate  may  be  applied
to three counties.  At the present time manufacturing  is restricted  to Caribou
and Bannock Counties, mining to Caribou and Bingham Counties.   It is  assumed
for design purposes that both manufacturing and mining production will  continue
to be divided in the same manner as in 1960, and that  employment will increase
at the same rate as output.  Employment in Caribou County would  then  be 120
persons in mining, 700 in manufacturing on 1985, 250 in  mining and  1,350  in
manufacturing in 2010.  Employment in Bannock  County would be 1,750 in  1985,
3,300 in 2010, all in manufacturing.  Employment in Bingham County  would  be
250 in 1985, 500 in 2010, all in mining.
       5.  Other Manufacturing
           Growth of manufacturing output and  employment from sources
other than the dominant food-processing and phosphate  industries should be
substantial in the future.  A number of sources of manufacturing growth exist.
           One of the possibilities for expansion is the Pocatello  plant
of Thiokol Chemical Co.  Originally leased from a Pocatello industrial  develop-
ment group, the former naval ordinance plant was purchased by Thiokol in  1962,
V  A minor start in the use of phosphate in forest fertilization is repre-
sented by Phos-kern, a product of Monsanto Chemical  Co.   Used for air spraying
of forest fires, the material is said to have a residual benefit in fertilizing
the sprayed area.

-------
                                                                    C-63
facilities were installed, and some modernization efforts  took  place.   Employ-
ment grew from 40 persons in 1961  to about 100 in the fourth  quarter of 1962.
Company spokesmen have indicated eventual  employment of 3,000.   Thiokol  is  one
of the leading producers in the field of rocket propulsion, and a substantial
member of the complex of large companies that specialize in advanced military
products.  Its growth has been rapid, and the probabilities of  its eventually
securing the contracts to bring the Pocatello plant into production of propel-
lants - engines, fuels, or both - would seem high under the conditions of a
protracted cold war.  The effect of such a circumstance on the  Pocatello area
could be immense, considering the prospects for establishment of manufacturing
industries ancillary to Thiokol - producers of tubing, valves,  instrumentation
devices, etc. - as well as the service employment which the added manufacturing
jobs would support.
           Expansion of the Arco Nuclear Reactor Project provides another
source of growth of science-based industry in the Upper Snake Baisn.  The pro-
ject has expanded since 1960, with 1962 employment exceeding  that of the
region's phosphate industry.  Like the Thiokol plant, however,  its level of
employment - indeed, its existence - depends on federal government expenditures.
Although it  is generally believed that the project is continuing and perma-
ent one, the rapid development of techniques for utilizing nuclear energy may
to some degree obviate the need for large scale experimental  projects  in remote
areas.  It does not appear likely, however, that the capital  investment repre-
sented by the project would be allowed to become fallow, and  conversion to
power-production or some other use might be expected to maintain the project
in the future.

-------
                                                                        C-64
           Less striking, but perhaps more certain,  sources of manu-
facturing growth lie in development of the resource  base.   Phosphate  deposits
contain two possibilities for growth, one immediate, one more  remote.   A  bay-
product of electric furnace production of elemental  phosphorus is  rich  in
vanadium.  Construction began in 1962 of a plant (Kermac Nuclear Fuels  Corp.,
a subsidiary of Kerr-McGee Industries) at Soda Springs  to  process  the ferophos-
phorus residues of the Monsanto plant.  Further development of vanaduim pro-
duction should accompany growth of phosphorus output, since demand for  the
metal, used to make light-weight, corrosion-resistant alloys,  is strong.  An-
other possible source of growth is a diversified chemical  industry based  on
phosphorus.  Under present conditions it is more economic  to ship  the base
product to major marketing areas for upgrading into  finished materials.  De-
velopment of phosphorus-based bulk materials could result  in further  upgrading
near the source of supply.
           Another source of manufacturing growth is the timber stands
of the Targhee National Forest.  Largely undeveloped at the present time  due
to distance from market, small trees (largely lodgepole pine), dormant  demand
for lumber and inadequate prospects for by-product utilization, the resource
neverthless holds some prospect for specialized development.  Stud mills,
producing kiln-dried, standard-length, two-by-four boards  for use  in  midwestern
construction markets, are a recent development in Idaho, and appear well  suited
for utilization of local trees.I/  Lodgepole pine is well  suited for  pulping
J/  One stud mill already exists in the Basin, at St.  Anthony (Area III).   Built
in. 1962, the plant employs about 30 persons.  The entire output is sold in the
midwest, and chips are shipped to a Wisconsin paper mill.  Another Area III
example of adapting production to the limitations of mountain forest growth is
a producer of log cabins.  Logs are cut and notched to shape and shipped for
assembly on the buyer's site.  Selling for $1,500 and transportation charges
the cabins would appear to have considerable market potential for summer homes
and other recreational uses.

-------
                                                                         C-65
but the limited growth of local  stands and the water pollution  problems  that
might result from adding pulp wastes to the food-processing  wastes  of the  Upper
Snake Basin would appear to push the possible appearance  of  a pulp  mill  to a
date well after 1985.  The development of more efficient  techniques of small-
scale pulp production would appear to be required before  such a plant could be
profitable operated.  Appearance of composition board production, utilizing both
round wood and residues from other plants in the Idaho-western  Montana region,
would appear possible before 1985, due to the likelihood  of  substantial  popula-
tion growth - and consequent market for construction materials  - in the Pocatello-
Idaho Falls area.
           In addition to these sources of growth, development  of diversified
manufacturing activity, based on advancing population and industrialization
rather than specific plants or resources, may be foreseen.   As  regional  markets
grow, it is characteristic of an industrial society for local  plants to supply
an increasing number of goods which were previously imported.   Since such  plants
tend to relieve a region's import requirements without, in most cases, develop-
ing external markets, their employment-generating characteristics are minor,  but
their growth can be  very fast in an atmosphere of industrialization and urban
concentration,  (e.g. Caribou County and Bannock County developed considerable
miscellaneous manufacturing employment between 1950 and 1960 in response to
growth of phosphate  production.)
           In projecting manufacturing employment, other than phosphorous
production and food  processing, separate projections are provided for chemical
manufacturing and all other types of manufacturing.

-------
                                                                    C-66
           The forecast for the chemical  industry  assumes that employment



by Thiokol  will  reach 3,000 persons  by 1985,  and that employment  in all other



types of chemical  manufacturing will  grow at  a 4.5 percent annual  rate between



1960 and 1985.  The Arco Project,  whose employment increased at about a twenty



percent rate between 1960 and 1962,  is presumed to be the source  of much of  this



growth, with moderate assistance from phosphorus-based materials.  Flattening



of the growth curve is to be expected, particularly for  the Arco  Project,  by



1985, when total employment in this  category  is forecast to amount to 7,700



persons, largely located in Area II.   Based on past and  existing  trends, which



suggest more intensive utilization of materials and continuing growth of chemical



processes and rocketry, a high rate  of growth would still appear  likely after



1985, with phosphorous-based materials supplying a considerable part of expansion.



Employment increase is forecast at a 1.8 percent rate -  the rate  of national



population increase - indicating total employment  of about 12,000 persons  by



2010 located largely within Area II.



           With the possible exception of lumbering, which is dependant



on a natural resource and in some measure responsive to  national  market condi-



tions, other types of manufacturing growth will  be related to the level of



development of primary manufacturing activities -  food processing and chemicals  -



and the level of population supported by them and  by agriculture. Growth  of



employment, then, is derived from the rate of growth in  primary manufacturing.



A 2.2  percent annual rate is assumed from 1960 to 2010. The rate represents



half the forecast growth rate of the two primary manufacturing industries  from



1960 to 1985, and is the relationship that existed in the Upper Snake Basin  be-



tween 1950 and 1960.  Maintenance of a two percent rate  even after growth  of



the primary sources has slowed reflects some  measure of  inter-relatedness  among

-------
                                                                      C-67
the secondary activities themselves,  and  the  development of greater  independence
from the more basic industries to be  expected as  the entire region attains a
higher degree of economic deversity.   Distribution  of employment among  the
divisions of the region according to  the  level  of 1960 employment in manu-
facturing and anticipated growth of primary manufacturing activities, v/ould sug-
gest that 75 percent of the growth of other manufacturing will occur in Area  II,
17 percent in Area I, and eight percent in Area III, these being roughly  the
portions of total forecast growth of  employment in  food-processing and  chemical
manufacturing allotted to the respective  areas.  The level of  1985 employment
in these secondary manufacturing activities would,  therefore,  be 1,700  in Area  I,
3,100 in Area II, 500 in Area III. Growth of employment at a  two percent annual
rate would bring 2010 employment to 2,800 in  Area I, 5,100 in  Area  II,  and 800
in Area III.
       6.  Transportation
           Between 1950 and 1960 transportation employment in  the Upper
Snake Basin, like that of the United  States as a  whole, fell significantly.   A
sharp decline in employment by railroads  in Bannock County was partially  offset
by generally higher employment in trucking and warehousing through  the  basin,
and by moderate increases in railroad employment  in parts of Area I  and Area  III.
A high relative level of employment in transportation was, however,  maintained
by the substantial increase in manufacturing  (manufacturing employment  increased
140 percent in the basin between 1950 and 1960, compared  to a  20 percent  in-
crease nationally) and agricultural output of the region.
            In transportation, as in agriculture,  very sharp gains in the
productivity of labor occurred during the nineteen-fifties.  This,  together with
a persistent diversion of traffic from railroad to  highway hauling,  brought a

-------
                                                                         C-68
32 percent decline in national railroad employment between 1950 and 1960.   Truck-

ing employment increased by an equal percentage, but because of the smaller

trucking base, employment by railroads and truckers combined declined over ten

percent.I/  Substantial further gains in the productivity of railroad labor

are possible in the near future through application of automation and revision

of work rules.

           While this might suggest some drain on future employment prospects

in transportation, it must be kept in mind that a considerable increase in out-

put of  both agricultural and manufactured products is forecast.  Although an

initial dip in railroad employment may be sustained, there is no reason to expect

labor productivity to increase indefinitely at current rates;  and since total

transportation requirements of the region will rise with production and popu-

lation, some expansion of employment seems indicated.  For the purposes of this

study it is assumed that non-railroad transportation employment will increase at

about a 1.5 percent annual rate.  The rate, slightly under that forecast for

national population, gives weight to anticiapted productivity gains, some di-

version of traffic to railroads, and a continuing growth in the use of captive

carriers.  Railroad transportation is forecast to increase at a .9 percent

annual  rate to 1985, a 1.8 percent rate, the same as national population, there-

after.  It is assumed that the decline in labor requirements of railroads will

continue some years in the future, then stabilize and rise with output.  The

 .9 percent rate  is simply half of the forecast rate of national population in-

crease, and is used to approximate the effect on employment of the predicted

rounding out of  the declining curve of railroad employment.  Transportation

employment in the Upper Snake Basin on this basis would be 8,500 in 1985,
 17It may be presumed  that  the  actual decline in numbers engaged in transpor-
 tation was somewhat less,  since  a  part of  the lost railroad traffic went to
 captive carriers.   The tendency of many  firms  to  transport their  goods  in owned
trucks led to the classification  of many .truckers  under manufacturing and trade
in census enumerations.

-------
                                                                       C-69

rising to 12,800 in 2010.   Distribution  of employment  among  sub-areas  is made
according to the forecast of employment  in manufacturing and in agriculture,
with some added weight given to Area II  to reflect Pocatello's depot status.
Transportation employment in 1985 is forecast to  be 2,600  in Area  I, 5,000 in
Area II and 900 in Area III.  The forecast for 2010 is 3,300 in Area I, 8,400
in Area II and 1,100 in Area III.
       7.  Construction and Services
           Construction is essential to  economic  growth, and the substantial
predicted gain in manufacturing output in the Upper Snake  Basin suggests con-
tinuing high rates of employment in construction.   Construction employment is
forecast to remain about six percent of the labor force in Area I  and  Area III,
and to amount to seven1  percent of the labor force in  Area II, because of the  con-
siderable faster rate of growth predicted for that sub-region.  (The rate may  be
compared to the 8.3 percent of 1950 and  6.3 percent of 1960.) Construction
employment would, then, amount to 3,200  in Area I, 7,100 in  Area  II  and 900  in
Area III by 1985, and 4,700 for Area I,  10,800 for Area II and 1,300 for Area
III by 2010.
           Employment in service industries depends, ultimately, on  the level
of employment in production industries and population.  As Table V (page 16)
suggests, service industry employment in the Upper Snake Basin was unusually
high for an agricultural area in 1960, a result of an  unusual concentration  of
transportation employment.  Services other than transportation were  represented
at levels somewhat under that of the United States as  a whole.
           Growth of service activities  in the study area  has, in  keeping
with national trends, exceeded the rate of population  growth. Education, public
administration, and professional services have grown particularly  rapidly.   There

-------
                                                                      C-70





is reason to anticipate that this  trend will continue.  Nationally, service



occupations increased their portion  of total employment from 61.3 percent in



1960 to 62.5 percent in 1961 and 63  percent  in early  1962.  With growing urban-



ization, the Upper Snake Basin  should  develop patterns of service employment



in line with national experience.



           No attempt is made in this  paper  to distribute service employment



by function.  Since the employment-generating effects of any particular service



industry may be presumed to be  low,  it is  the level of over-all service employ-



ment that is considered.  There are  certain  difficulties, however, in assigning



a suitable level.  It would be  patently unrealistic to assume that the ratio of



service to production employment will  in  1985 and  2010 approximate the level of



I960 - both long term and current  comparative growth  rates  indicates that



services will expand faster than production  industries.  Between 1940 and 1950



non-transportation service industries  in  the U.  S. added an average increment



of .27 percent each year to their  portion  of total employment;  while between



1950 and 1960 the addition was  even  sharper, an  average increment of .62 per-



cent annually.  Obviously this  cannot  continue  indefinitely.  Production in-



dustries will net disappear entirely,  and  it appears  likely that at some point



in the future an equalibrium between production  and service employment must be



struck.



           In order to construct a model  of  the  1985  and 2010 economies of



the Upper Snake Basin, it is assumed that the annual  increment  to the ratio of



non-transportation service employment  in  the region will be .3  percent, a



figure very close to that of the U.  S. as  a  whole  between 1940 land 1950.  While



the rate of change is under the recent experience  of  the region, it reflects



the supposition that production industries will  be able to  absorb a proportionately

-------
                                                                       C-71
larger part of the labor force than during the  recent  past,  due  to slowing



of the decline in agricultural employment and rising manufacturing activity.



It is assumed, further, that 65 percent of the  labor force represents  the



effective ceiling of non-transportation service employment in  this resource-



oriented area.



           Utilizing these assumptions, the forecast of non-transportation



service employment in 1985 is 31,100 persons in Area I, 66,100 in  Area II,



8,700 in Area III.  By 2010 the figures would rise in  Area I to  51,100 in



Area II to 100,100, and in Area III to 14,500.



       8.  Total Labor Force



           One of the underlying assumptions of this paper is  that employ-



ment in the future will be maintained at 96 percent of the civilian labor force



A regional labor force of 177,100 in 1985 and 265,700  in 2010  is derived by



combining employment forecasts for various industries  and areas.  The  hypo-



thetical distribution of the labor force by industry and by  area is summarized



in Tables XXI and XXII.

-------
                                                                        C-72
                                  TABLE XXI

                    DISTRIBUTION OF THE LABOR FORCE,  1985
Industry
Agriculture
Construction
Manufacturing
Potato processing
meat packing
other food
phosphorus
other chemical
other mfg
Transportation
Other services
Unemployment
Labor Force
Area I
10,300
3,200
2,000
400
1 ,900
1,700
2,600
31,100
2,200
55,400
Area II
6,000
7,100
1,800
400
1,700
2,800 £
7,700
3,100
5,000
66,100
3,900
105,600
a/ Included among "other food".
b/ Includes only elemental phosphorus and


Industry
Agriculture
Construction
Manufacturing
potato processing
meat packing
other food
phosphorus
other chemical
other mfg.
Transportation
Other Services
Unemployment
Labor Force

DISTRIBUTION
Area I
10,300
4,700
3,100
700
2,600
2,800
3,300
51,100
3,200
81,800
TABLE XXII
Area III
3,500
900
500
a/
450
500
900
8,750
600
16,200
phosphate ferti

Basin
19,800
11,200
4,300
800
4,050
2,800
7,700
5,300
8,500
105,950
6,700
177,100
lizers.

OF THE LABOR FORCE, 2010
Area II
6,000
10,800
3,200
700
2,300
5,400 £/
12,000
5,100
8,400
100,100
6,400
160,400
Area III
3,500
1 ,300
800
a/
600
800
1,100
14,500
900
23,500
Basin
19,800
16,800
7,100
1 ,400
5,900
5,400
12,000
8,700
12,800
165,700
10,500
265,700
a/  Included among "other food".
b/  Includes only elemental  phosphorus and phosphate fertilizers.

-------
                                                                      C-73

    B.  Estimated Future Population
        1.   General
            The estimate of future population  is  based on the employment models
presented in Tables  XXI and XXII.  Assuming  that  the national labor  force as a
percent of population remains unchanged from 1960 levels, and that the standard-
izing forces of industrialization, immigration, and mass communication make
labor force representation in the Upper Snake  Basin the same as the  national
average (labor force as a percent of population was actually moderately below
the national average in 1960), the indicated future labor force of the region,
set at 38 percent of total population,  would support a population of 466,200
in 1985 and 699,100  in 2010.
            The population forecast  for the  area  suggests considerable acceler-
ation over past rates of population  growth.  During the period 1960  to 1985 an
average annual population increase of 2.2 percent, and from 1985 to  2010 an
average annual increase of 1.6 percent are projected, compared to a  1.4 percent
increase in the periods 1930 to 1960 and 1950  to  1960.
        2.   Population Pistribution
            Distribution of the projected future  population is made  on the
same basis as the projection of population for the Upper Snake Basin. The
labor force of each  area is assumed  to make  up 38 percent of that area's total
population.  Thus, the population of Area I  is projected to 145,800  in 1985 and
215,200 in 2010.  The population of  Area II  is projected to 277,800  in 1985,
422,100 in 2010.  The population of  Area III is projected to 42,600  in 1985,
61,800 in 2010.

-------
                                                                         C-74
            Distribution of the population forecast for sub-areas was  accomp-
lished in separate ways, depending on the economic characteristics  of  each
area.  A population break-down for the parts of Area I  is  presented in Table
XXIII.  The table relies mainly on the projection of historic  relationships
among the parts of the area.  Rural population, including  towns  with populations
under 1,000, was assumed to remain unchanged;  although during the  last twenty-
five years rural populations have declined.   The City of Twin  Falls was assumed
to receive 60 percent of the area's anticipated population growth,  compared  to
68.5 percent between 1940 and 1960;  as the largest settled place in the area
it is the most logical site for industrial and service  industries to establish.
The towns of the area with a population of 1,000 to 2,500  has  divided  among
them 2.5 percent of the anticipated population growth of the area.   Predicted
slowing of the decline in agricultural employment suggests some moderate growth
for these towns.  Remaining population growth was apportioned  on the basis of
1960 population among towns with populations over 2,500.  While this assigns
somewhat more than their recent growth experience to such  towns, it appears
to be a not unreasonable forecast, since food-processing,  an essentially de-
centralized industry in which twin falls has no advantage  except size  of labor
force, is the main force behind predicted growth.
            Distribution of the population of Area II,  shown in Table  XXIV,
was accomplished through an assignment of a portion of  expected future employ-
ment likely, on the basis of present economic circumstances, to be  found in
each county.  Unlike Area I, a moderate portion of the  anticipated  population
growth was assigned to rural areas.  The substantial industrial  growth ex-
pected in Area  II is expected to result in spill-over of population in small
towns surrounding larger manufacturing and service centers - as has already

-------
                                                                       C-76
                                TABLE XXIII

           AREA I:  ESTIMATED POPULATION DISTRIBUTION, 1960-2010
                                             Population in Thousands
Area.                                     1960          T985          2010

Camas County total                         .9            .9            .9

Gooding County total                      9.5          11.7          15.4
  rural                                   5.6           5.6           5.6
.  Wendell                                 1.2           1.4           1.8
  Gooding                                 2.7           4.7           8.0

Twin Falls County                        41.8          70.3         116.2
  rural       ,                           16.1          16.1          16.1
  Buhl                                    3.1           5.3           8.9
  Filer                                   1.2           1.4           1.7
  Kimberley                               1.3           1.6           2.0
  Twin Falls                             20.1          45.9          82.5

Blaine County                             4.6           4.8           5.1
  rural                                   3.4           3.4           3.4
  Hailey                                  1.2           1.4           1.7

Lincoln County                            3.7           3.9           4.2
  rural                                   2.6           2.6           2.6
  Shoshone                                1.1           1.3           1.6

Jerome County                            11.7          15.2          20.7
  rural                                   6.9           6.9           6.9
  Jerome                                  4.8           8.3          13.8

Minidoka County                          14.4          17.4          22.2
  rural                                  10.2          10.2          10.2
  Rupert                                  4.2           7.2          12.0

Cassia County                            16.1          21.5          30.3
  rural                                   8.6           8.6           8.6
  Burley                                  7.5          12.9          21.8

TOTAL                                   102.8         145.7         215.0

-------
                                                                       C-77
                               TABLE XXIV

         AREA II:  ESTIMATED POPULATION DISTRIBUTION,  1960-2010


                                                  Population  in  Thousands
Area                                          1960T9852010

Butte County                                   3.5           3.7         4.1
  rural                                        1.9           1.9         1.9
  Arco                                         1.6           1.8         2.2

Bingham County                                28.2         35.9        47.9
  rural                                       16.7         16.7        17.0
  Aberdeen                                     1.5           2.3         4.5
  Blackfoot                                    7.4         12.6        25.6
  Shelley                                      2.6           4.3        10.8

Power County                                   4.1           4.9         5.5
  rural                                        2.0           2.1          2.1
  American Falls                               2.1           2.8         3.4

Bannock County                                49.3         116.1         182.9
  rural                                        8.5         11.5        15.0
  Pocatello                                   40.8         104.6        167.9

Caribou County                                 6.0  '       14.0        26.9
  rural                                        3.6           3.7         4.0
  Soda Springs                                 2.4         10.3        22.9

Bonneville County                             46.9         102.8        154.7
  rural                                       11.8         14.2        16.2
  Ammon                                        1.9           2.5         3.0
  Idaho Falls                                 33.2         85.1         135.5
TOTAL                                        138.1          277.4         422.0

-------
                                                                      C-78
                              TABLE XXV

       AREA III:  ESTIMATED POPULATION DISTRIBUTION, I960 - 2010
Area

Jefferson County
  Ri gby
  rural

Madison County
  rural
  Rexburg

Teton County

Clark County

Fremont County
  rural
  St. Anthony
                                                  Population in Thousands
1960
11.7
2.3
9.4
9.4
4.6
4.8
2.6
.9
8.7
5.0
2.7
1985
14.3
3.8
10.4
13.8
5.1
8.6
2.7
1.0
10.8
5.8
4.9
2010
19.3
7.3
12.0
22.2
5.9
16.3
2.7
1.0
16.3
7,3
9.0
TOTAL
33.3
42.6
61.5

-------