EPA-450/3-74-005
DECEMBER 1973
STATE OF UTAH
COMPILATION OF
NEDS DATA
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Office of Air and Water Programs
Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards
Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711
-------
EPA-450/3-74-005
STATE OF UTAH
COMPILATION OF
NEDS DATA
Prepared by
R. Hall, J. Bartlett, N. Surprenant
GCA Corporation
GCA Technology Division
Bedford, Massachusetts 01730
Contract No. 68-02-1006
Task Order No. 2
EPA Project Officer: Marius Gedgaudas
Prepared for
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Office of Air and Water Programs
Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards
Research Triangle Park, N. C. 27711
December 1973
-------
This report is issued by the Environmental Protection Agency to report
technical data of interest to a limited number of readers. Copies are
available free of charge to Federal employees, current contractors and
grantees, and nonprofit organizations - as supplies permit - from the
Air Pollution Technical Information Center, Environmental Protection
Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711, or from the
National Technical Information Service, 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield,
Virginia 22151.
This report was furnished to the Environmental Protection Agency by
GCA Corporation, Bedford, Massachusetts, in fulfillment of Contract
No. 68-02-1006. The contents of this report are reproduced herein as
received from GCA Corporation. The opinions, findings, and conclusions
expressed are those of the author and not necessarily those of the Environ-
mental Protection Agency. Mention of company or product names is not
to be considered as an endorsement by the Environmental Protection
Agency.
Publication No. EPA-450/3-74-005
11
-------
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
GCA Technology Division extends its gratitude to Dr. Lynden Thatcher,
Dr. Winn, Mr. Caspar Weinberger and Mr. Lynden Price of the Air Quality
Section of the Utah State Division of Health.
The guidance of Marius Gedgaudas of the EPA was also appreciated.
ill
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section Title Page
I INTRODUCTION "1
II SUMMARY OF POINT AND AREA SOURCES 2
A. Particulates . 2
B. Sulfur Dioxide 2
C. Nitrogen Oxides 2
D. Hydrocarbons .3
E. Carbon Monoxide 3
III SUMMARY OF GRID RESULTS 4
IV POINT SOURCE METHODOLOGY 6
V AREA SOURCE METHODOLOGY 8
A. Emission Estimates 8
B. Residential Fuel 8
C. Commercial - Institutional Fuel 8
D. Industrial Fuel 8
E. On Site Incineration and Open Burning 8
F. Gasoline Fuel 9
G. Diesel Fuel 9
H. Aircraft 10
I. Vessels 10
J. Evaporation 10
K. Measured Vehicle Miles 10
L. Miscellaneous Sources 10
VI GRID SYSTEM METHODOLOGY 12
Figure
1 Map of Utah (Air Quality Control Regions, and Counties) 14
2 Overall map of grid system 15
3 Grids 107-135 16
4 Grids 136-159 17
5 Grids 160-171 18
6 Grids 172-234 19
7 Grids 235-273 20
IV
-------
Figure
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Table
1
2
3
4
5
6
APPENDIX
TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued)
Title
Grids 274-312
Census tracts, Provo-Orem and vicinity
Weber, Davis, Salt Lake, Utah Counties
Weber, Davis, Salt-Lake, Utah Counties
Weber, Davis, Salt-Lake, Utah Counties
Weber, Davis, Salt Lake, Utah Counties
Weber, Davis, Salt Lake, Utah Counties
Tons of pollutant/year
Tons of pollutant/year
Emission rate (10~3 tons/day)
General grid data in 10~3 tons per day per mi
Emission factor (Ib/unlt)
Factors for area source emissions from mobile sources
Page
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
35
36
42
43
44
REFERENCES
46
-------
SECTION 1
INTRODUCTION
This report describes the work that GCA Technology Division performed in
updating the National Emission Data System (NEDS) for Utah for the EPA.
The point source data was obtained from the files of the Air Quality
Section of the Utah State Division of Health. Data for about 80 sources was
recorded on NEDS point source forms. Sources with the potential to emit
over 25 tons/year of any of the five major pollutants, (particulates, sulfur
dioxide, nitrogen oxides, hydrocarbons, and carbon monoxide) were included.
The Air Quality Section of the Utah State Division of Health completed
the NEDS area source forms during August 1973. GCA evaluated the methods
used and thoroughly checked the area source forms.
In order to present the geographical distribution of emissions in the
area of the highest emissions, a grid system for the Davis, Salt Lake, Utah,
and Weber County areas was developed by GCA. The grid consisted of 312
squares ranging in size from 400 km2 to L57 km2. Emissions from all sources
were calculated for each grid.
-------
SECTION II
SUMMARY OF POINT AND AREA SOURCES
The results of the emission inventory are summarized in tables 1 and 2.
Table 1 summarizes the data by Air Quality Control Region and source type.
Table 2 summarizes the data by county and source type. Figure 1 is a map of
Utah, the Air Quality Control Regions, and the counties. A general discus-
sion of the results for each of the five pollutants is presented in the fol-
lowing sections.
A. Particulates
1. Statewide, 36% of the calculated particulate emissions
were from area sources. Combustion of coal by industry
was responsible for over half of the area source parti-
culate emissions. Point sources accounted for 64% of
the particulate emissions. About one-third of the point
source emissions were from coal combustion.
2. The particulate emissions rates from the three AQCR's
were quite different. Only 3% of the total particulate
emissions in Utah occurred in the Four Corners Interstate
AQCR. Particulate emissions in the small Wasatch Front
Intrastate AQCR accounted for 67% of the particulate
emissions in Utah.
B. Sulfur Dioxide
1. Area sources accounted for only 9% of the sulfur dioxide
emissions in Utah. Industrial combustion of distillate oil,
residual oil and coal was the primary area source of sul-
fur dioxide. A copper smelting operation in the Wasatch
Front AQCR was responsible for 65% of the sulfur dioxide
emitted in Utah. The remainder of the point source sulfur
dioxide emissions was caused by fuel burning.
2. Sulfur dioxide emissions from the Wasatch Front AQCR were
92% of the state total. Point sources in the Wasatch Front
AQCR accounted for 85% of the sulfur dioxide emitted in
Utah.
C. Nitrogen Oxides
1. Area sources account for 77% of the nitrogen oxides emission
in Utah. On and off highway fuel use accounts for over half
the nitrogen oxide emissions. Point source emissions of
nitrogen oxides are caused by fuel burning operations. The
-------
largest point sources are petroleum refining and metal-
lurgical industries.
2. The Wasatch Front Interstate AQCR accounts for 68% of the
nitrogen oxide emissions in Utah.
D. Hydrocarbons
1. Area sources account for 92% of the hydrocarbon emissions.
Over 60% of the hydrocarbon emissions are from transpor-
tation sources. Evaporative sources account for about 8%
of the hydrocarbon emissions. Petroleum refining and the
metallurgical industry are the primary hydrocarbon point
sources.
2. The Wasatch Front AQCR accounts for 64% of the hydrocarbon
emissions in Utah. Point sources in the Wasatch Front
AQCR account for 99% of the point source hydrocarbon emis-
sions in Utah.
E. Carbon Monoxide
1. Area sources account for 97% of the carbon monoxide emis-
sions. About 90% of the carbon monoxide emissions are from
transportation sources. Point source emissions occur pri-
marily from petroleum refining and the metallurgical
industry with significant emissions also occurring from
solid waste disposal and large fuel burning sources.
Petroleum refineries and large metallurgical operations have
carbon monoxide controls.
2. The Wasatch Front AQCR accounts for 65% of the carbon
monoxide emissions in Utah.
-------
SECTION III
SUMMARY OF GRID RESULTS
The study area for this grid system consisted of Davis, Salt Lake, Utah
and Weber counties in the Wasatch Front Intrastate AQCR. The only county
in the Wasatch Front AQCR not included in the grid system was Tooele county.
The grid system, using UTM coordinates, consisted of 312 square grids rang-
9 £ 9
ing in size from 400 km • to 1.57 km . The smaller grids were located in
the more densely populated areas. Figures 2-8 are maps of the grid system.
Figure 2 is an overall map, while Figures 3-8 are maps of inset areas.
The emission density maps, Figures 10-14, and Table 3 summarize the
_3
results of the grid system study. Table 3 listing the emission rates (10
tons/day) for the overall area and each inset area shows that the majority
of the emissions occur in the inset areas. Table 3 shows that 67% of the
particulates, 27% of the sulfur dioxide, 59% of the nitrogen oxides, 78% of
the hydrocarbons and 76% of the carbon monoxide emissions occur in the inset
_3
areas. Figures 10-14 show the much higher emission densities (10 ton/day-
2
mi ) that occur in the densely populated inset areas.
Emissions for each grid were calculated by a computer program. For each
grid, Table 4 lists the area (square miles) and the emission density for
each of the five major pollutants. Additional data including a table for
each grid, listing emission densities for each pollutant and source type
has been calculated and is available. The following source types are included
in the above table:
Point Sources
Area Sources
Residential
Bituminous Coal
•Distillate Oil
Natural Gas
Commercial-Institutional
Bituminous Coal
Distillate Oil
Residual Oil
Natural Gas
-------
industrial
Diesel Fuel
Evaporation
Incineration
Bituminous Coal
Distillate Oil
Residual Oil
Natural Gas
Off Highway
Railroads
Solvent
Gasoline
Industrial
Commercial
Limited Access Roads
Rural Roads
Light Vehicles
Heavy Vehicles
Heavy Vehicles - Diesel
Light Vehicles
Heavy Vehicles
Heavy Vehicles - Diesel
Urban Roads
Light Vehicles
Heavy Vehicles
Heavy Vehicles - Diesel
Off Highway - Gasoline
Airports
Emissions from sources not Included in the above list are not significant
or unknown.
-------
SECTION IV
POINT SOURCE METHODOLOGY
The purpose of the point source emission inventory was to complete NEDS
point source forms on all sources emitting over 25 tons/year (before control
equipment) of any of the five major pollutants. The Air Quality Section of
the Utah State Division of Health conducted the point source data collection.
Information on approximately 80 plants was furnished to GCA. It was necessary
to use 1970 data for about 6 sources as no new data had been collected. GCA
designed a mailing list of potential sources in an effort to be sure that .all
sources had been located. The mailing list was inspected by personnel of
the Air Quality Section and they determined that it contained no additional
sources.
NEDS point source forms were completed for the following types of sources:
solid waste disposal facilities, electric power generation plants, feed and
grain elevators, phosphate fertilizer manufacturers, nitrate fertilizer
manufacturers, copper smelting, iron and steel mills, gray iron foundries,
secondary lead smelters, brick and clay products, portland cement manufac-
turers, clay sintering plants, coal drying plants, concrete batch plants,
lime manufacturing plants, gypsum manufacturing plants, asphalt concrete
plants, perlite manufacturing plants, phosphate rock processing plants, sand
and gravel processing plants, stone quarrys, petroleum refineries and various
establishments with boilers. The largest individual sources were copper
smelters, steel plants, petroleum refineries and electric power plants.
NEDS point source forms were completed according to the directions in
"Guide for Compiling a Comprehensive Emission Inventory" About 200 point
I.D.*s were completed for the 80 plants included in this inventory. Whenever
possible, plant data was broken down into individual source data and entered
on separate point I.D. forms. UTM coordinates to the nearest one-tenth of
a kilometer were generally available from Utah personnel. When necessary,
GCA used 1/24,000 scale U.S.G.S. maps to obtain the UTM coordinates. Stack
data when available was recorded. Pollution control efficiencies reported
by sources were almost always used. In cases where the pollution control
-------
efficiency was unreasonable or not given, the efficiency was estimated from
2 3
data in AP42-1 and AP42-2 . Emission data from stack sampling was avail-
able from some sources and was always used. For sources not reporting
emissions, the emissions were calculated from data in AP42-2. Utah air pol-
lution control regulations were used to calculate allowable particulate
emissions for sources not located in the Wasatch Front Intrast,ate AQCR and
to calculate allowable sulfur dioxide emissions regardless of location.
Allowable particulate emissions for sources located in the Wasatch Front
4
Intrastate AQCR were calculated according to new regulations issued by the
EPA in May 1973. When the sulfur or ash content of a fuel was unavailable
it was assumed to be equal to the area source sulfur or ash content as
reported by Utah personnel.
-------
SECTION V
AREA SOURCE METHODOLOGY
The NEDS area source forms were completed by the Air Quality Section of
the Utah State Division of Health. The methods used generally followed
chapter 5 of APTD 1135 and are outlined below.
. A. Emission Estimates
Emission estimates were calculated from emission factors found
in AP42-12. Aircraft emissions, were calculated from data on
LTO's, type of aircraft and number of engines per plane.
B. Residential Fuel
Residential use of bituminous coal, distillate oil and wood
was calculated from census data on the number of dwelling
units using each fuel in each county5, the average number of
rooms per dwelling unit in Utah,5 degree day data and the
fuel consumption factors in APTD 1135. Natural gas use was
obtained from dealers.
C. Commercial - Institutional Fuel
Commercial-institutional bituminous coal, distillate oil and
residual oil use was determined from the latest Bureau of
Mines data.6,7 when necessary, the residential and point
source commercial-institutional fuel use was subtracted from
the Bureau of Mines data before apportioning to counties. „
The above fuel use was apportioned to counties by population.
Commercial-institutional natural gas used by county was
obtained by contacting natural gas dealers.
D. Industrial Fuel
Industrial bituminous coal, distillate oil and residual oil
use was obtained from the latest Bureau of Mines data.6>7
After subtracting industrial point source fuel usage the
remaining fuel use was apportioned to counties by manufactur-
ing employees.^ Industrial natural gas usage was determined by
contacting natural gas dealers.
E. On Site Incineration and Open Burning
On site incineration and open burning estimates were deter-
mined from the national per capita averages as indicated in
APTD 1135*. County and urban population was obtained from
the 1970 census.^ Open burning by industrial and commercial-
institutional sources is prohibited in Utah so zeroes, were
8
-------
entered in the appropriate spaces. Residential open burn-
ing is prohibited in Davis, Salt Lake, Utah and Weber
counties so zeroes were entered for open burning in those
counties.
F. Gasoline Fuel
Data in "Vehicle Miles on Utah Highways 1972"9 and an 1Q
additional table published by the Utah Highway Department
was used to determine gasoline fuel used and measured vehicle
miles. The first publication contains VMT data by county
and vehicle type but only includes state or federally aided
roads. The second publication includes all roads but only
VMT data by road type for the whole state. Local rural
roads, not state or federally aided, account for 17% of the
rural VMT so the county VMT data in the first publication
was increased by 17% to include these roads. Similarly,
county VMT data for urban areas was increased by 30% in
order to include local urban or municipal roads.
Heavy vehicle gasoline usage was determined by subtracting
the state diesel VMT from the state heavy vehicle VMT and
then dividing by an average fuel consumption of 8.4 miles
per gallon. The state heavy vehicle gasoline was apportioned
to counties by heavy vehicle VMT data.
Light vehicle gasoline was determined by subtracting the
heavy vehicle gasoline from the total taxed gasoline and
then adding the gasoline used by government vehicles. Light
vehicle gasoline use was apportioned to counties by VMT
data.
Off highway gasoline consumption was calculated from the
factors of 1000 gallons/tractor-year and 13 gallons/person .
as specified in APTD 11351. Data on tractors in Utah was
obtained from the "Census of Agriculture". Off highway
gasoline was distributed to counties by population.
G. Diesel Fuel
On highway heavy vehicle diesel fuel consumption was obtained
from the Utah State Tax Commission. Heavy vehicle diesel fuel
was apportioned to counties by county heavy vehicle VMT data.
Off highway diesel fuel was calculated by using the factors
of 1000 gallon/tractor year, 5000 gallons/year per non-
building construction employee and 7.4 galIons/person as
specified in APTD 1135. In addition, it was known that a
large open pit mining operation in Salt Lake county uses
7,000,000 gallons/year or 1000 galIons/employee. Therefore,
an additional factor of 1000 gallon/mining employee was used.
-------
Diesel fuel use for mining was only a small part of the
total off highway diesel fuel use in all counties except
Salt Lake County. County off highway diesel fuel consump-
tion was calculated directly from each of the above factors.
Diesel fuel usage by railroads was obtained by contacting
railroad companies. .
H. Aircraft
Aircraft LTO cycles were determined from a study done by a
university in Utah. Also military airfields were contacted.
I. Vessels
Fuel use by vessels was expected to be a very small source
of air pollution in Utah, so it was assumed to be zero.
J. Evaporation
Solvent purchased was determined from the factor of 2.7
pounds per person per year for dry cleaning and the additional
factors for surface coating and degreesing as listed in Table
5.2 in APTD 1135.l
Gasoline marketed was calculated by summing the previously
calculated gasoline use.
K. Measured Vehicle Miles
The data in Vehicle Miles on Utah Highways was adjusted as
previously discussed in the section on gasoline fuel and was
used as measured vehicle miles. Limited access road VMT was
obtained from VMT on interstate highways. Rural road VMT
were obtained from the rural category. The suburban and
urban VMT total were assumed to equal the urban category in
Vehicle Miles on Utah Highways. The suburban and urban road
VMT were estimated by separating the inner city travel and
the travel on the fringes of the city.
L. Miscellaneous Sources
1. Dirt road vehicle miles traveled was estimated from
data on the type of road, length of road and the
average number of vehicles/week for each type of road.
Each county was done separately by maps.
2. Dirt air strip data was obtained from the Utah
Aeronautics Commission.
10
-------
3. Construction land area was assumed to be the area
likely to be damaged by wind as reported on U.S.
Soil and Conservation maps.
4. Rock handling and storage data was obtained from
replies to questionnaires by sources that were too
small to be point sources.
5. Forest fire and stack burning data by county was
obtained from the state forest service.
6. Frost control in Utah is very small and was
assumed to be zero.
7. Structure fires were calculated by using the factor
of 4 fires/1000 people as specified in APTD 1135.*
8. There is no coal refuse burning in Utah.
GCA reviewed all area source categories. However, the emission estimates
were not re-calculated. The total off highway diesel fuel use exceeded the
published Bureau of Mines total by 82%; Off highway diesel fuel use cal-
culated for mining was only a small contribution to all counties except Salt
Lake where it is known to be accurate. Therefore, the numbers were not
changed. Methods used to estimate suburban VMT may not have been accurate
and the data entered in NEDS forms should really be measured vehicle miles
travelled. No revisions on the NEDS area source forms were made by GCA.
However, when the data was used for the grid system, suburban and urban VMT
were combined and treated as urban.
11
-------
SECTION VI
GRID SYSTEM METHODOLOGY
The purpose and results of the grid system study have been previously
described in section III. The purpose of this section is to describe the
methods used to design the system and calculate the emissions. Since the
grid data will be used in meteorological dispersion models, all grids must
be square. Higher emissions usually occur in more densely populated areas,
so to better present the distribution of emissions, smaller grids were
drawn in those areas. Maps showing the grid system are presented in Figure
2-8. The population in each grid was determined from 1970 census tract
12,13,14
maps. » »•
Figure 9 shows some of the census track that were used to determine the
population of the grid in Figure 8.
NEDS area source data, completed in August 1973 by the Air Quality
Section of .the Utah State Division of Health was used extensively. Individual
county totals for residential, commercial-institutional and industrial fuel
use was apportioned to grids in the county by population. County totals for
on site incineration, solvent purchased, and gasoline marketed were also
apportioned to grids by population. Off highway diesel fuel and gasoline
were apportioned to grids by area. However, before apportioning off highway
diesel fuel, the 7,000,000 gallons used at the large open pit copper mine in
Salt Lake county were assigned to the appropriate grid as a point source.
Data was obtained from the Air Quality Section of the Utah State Division
of Health on diesel fuel usage by railroads. The data included the amounts
used in each-county in both railroad yards and on open tracks. The diesel
fuel used in each county in railroad yards was apportioned to grids by the
relative size of the railroad yards on 1/24,000 scale U.S.G.S. maps. Diesel
fuel used on open tracks was apportioned to grids by track miles.
Airport LTO cycles for each of the 9 airports in the grid study area were
obtained from the Air Quality Section of the Utah State Division of Health.
Airport locations were determined from 1/24,000 scale U.S.G.S. maps and
assigned to the appropriate grids.
12
-------
Three methods were used to determine the vehicle miles travelled in the
grid areas. Traffic flow maps were used for grids 117-120 and 124, 125
in Ogden and grids 289, 291, 298, 299, 301, 302, and 305 in the Provo area.
Vehicle miles travelled in 239 traffic zones in the Salt Lake City area have
been published. The grids for the present study were drawn over the 239
traffic zones and the VMT data was apportioned to grids 177, 179, 181, 186-
208, 211-230, 232, 237-2A6, 251-260. County VMT data were apportioned to
all other grids by population. In Salt Lake county, 71% of the VMT were
assigned to grids by the traffic zone method.
Emissions from all of the above sources were calculated using area source
emission factors and methods obtained from the Environmental Protection
Agency in Durham, North Carolina. Tables 5 and 6 list the emission factors
that were used. Appendix A describes the methods used to calculate motor
vehicle emissions.
A computer program was written and used to apportion sources to grids,
to calculate emissipns, and to do the summations and calculations necessary
for the final data output. .Point source emissions which had been previously
calculated were assigned to grids by hand and included in the final computer
outputs and summations.
13
-------
WASATCH
FRONT
INTRASTATE
UTAH
INTRASTATE
(REMAINING
AREA)
FOUR CORNERS
INTERSTATE
(ARIZONA-
COLORADO-
NEW MEXICO-
UTAH)
Figure 1. Map of Utah (Air Quality Control
Regions, and Counties)
14
-------
•MO
MO
Figure 2. Overall map of grid system
15
-------
4570
4565
4560
vO
to
•o
f">
UJ
60
4550
415
420
425
16
-------
4555
4550
4545
4540
405
425
Figure 4. Grids 136 - 159
-------
4530
4520
430
Figure 5. Grids 160 - 171
18
-------
4520
4515
4510
415
420
425
Figure 6. Grids 172 - 234
430
435
-------
4505
N>
O
4490
410
4 2O
425
430
4SS
Figure 7. Grids 235 - 273
-------
4469
443
490
459
Figure 8. Grids 274 - 312
21
-------
Figure 9. Census tracts, Provo-Qrem and vicinity
22
-------
Figure 10. Weber, Davis, Salt Lake, Utah Counties
4MO
Particulate Emission Density
-3 2
10 tons/day - mi
80-200 - P777I
200 -400 -
4«0
4*0
SCO
9(0
23
-------
Figure 11. Weber, Davlc, Salt Lake, Utah Counties
41*0
4S«0 -
S02 Emission Density
10 tons/day - mi
100-1000 -V//VJ
1000-2000 - |////I
24
-------
Figure 12. Weber, Davis, Salt Lake, Utah Counties
NO Emission Density
3L
-3 2
10 tons/day - mi
o-io -L
10-50 -
50-100 -
100-300 -I///1
300-600 -17771
440O
400
420
440
4*0
4*0
too
•10
25
-------
Figure 13» Weber, Davis, Salt Lake, Utah Counties
4MO
HC Emission Density
10"3 tons/day - mi2
o-io -L
10-50
50-100 -EMSS
100-300 - |>/ /|
300-600 -
]
4«0
soo
MO
26
-------
Figure 14, Weber, Davis, Salt Lake, Utah Counties
4SSO
4960
CO Emission Density
-3 2
10 tons/day - mi
4400
440
4«0
4*0
»OO
aso
27
-------
Table 1. Tons of pollutant/year
Particulate
TOTAL ALL REGIONS 68,229
Four Corners Interstate AQCR 1,987
Area Sources 1,700
Point Sources 287
Steam Electric Power 92
Commercial-Institutional 0
Industrial 195
UTAH INTRASTATE- AQCR 20,817
Area Sources 7,800
Point Sources 13,017
Steam Electric Power 5,195
Commercial-Industrial 66
Industrial 7,756
WASATCH FRONT INTRASTATE -AQCR . 45,425
Area Sources 17,100
Point Sources 28,325
Steam Electric Power 608
Commercial-Institutional 783
Industrial 26,934
so2
161,073
1,702
1,600
102
99
0
3
11,451
4,100
7,351
3,680
123
3,548
147,920
10,600
137,320
7,608
1,183
128,529
NO
X
104,583
8,500
8,400
100
93
0
7
24,847
20,400
4,447
3,500
87
860
71,236
51,300
19*936
6,212
1,164
12,560
HC
124,323
15,126
15,100
26
3
0
23
29,098
29,000
98
58
4
36
80,099
70,300
9,799
120
80
9,599
CO
531,951
51,041
48,500
2,541
6
0
2,535
134,796
134,400
396
193
7
196
346,114
335,200
10,914
243
111
10,560
N>
00
-------
Table 2. Tons of pollutant/year
County
BEAVER - 0040
Area Sources
Point Sources
Steam Electric Power
Commercial-Institutional
Industrial
BOX ELDER - 0080
Area Sources
Point Sources
Steam Electric Power
Commercial-Institutional
Industrial
CACHE - 0120
Area Sources
Po ink- -Sou r c e s
Steam Electric Power
Commercial- Institutional
Industrial
CARBON - 0140
Area Sources
Point Sources
•Steam Electric Power
Commercial -Institutional
Industrial
DAGGETT- 0200
Area Sources
Point Sources
Steam Electric Power
Commercial- Institutional
Industrial
Particulate
400
400
0
0
0
0
2,671
2 , 600
71
0
0
71
1,519
1,300
219
0
66
153
5,810
500
5,310
5,195
0
115
0
0
0
0
0
0
SO
200Z
200
0
0
0
0
1,432
800
632
0
0
632
750
600
150
0
123
27
4,302
500
3,802
3,680
0
122
0
0
0
0
0
0
NO
80fi
800
0
0
0
0
4,386
4,200
186
0
0
186
2,799
2,700
9
0
87
12
5,080
1,500
3,580
3,500
0
80
100
100
0
0
0
0
HC
1,300
1,300
0
0
0
0
6,609
6,600
9
0
0
9
3,906
3,900
6
0
4
2
1,763
1,700
63
58
0
5
200
200
0
0
0
0
CO
5,700
5,700
0
0
0
0
28,612
28,600
12
0
. o
12
19,909
19,900
9
0
: •-. 7 '
* 2
i 9,496
1T9.100
H 306
/ 193
0
•; 113
900
900
0
0
0
,6
-------
Table 2. (continued)
County
DAVIS - 0220
Area Sources
Point Sources
Steam Electric Power
Commercial- Institutional
Industrial
DUCHESNE - 0260
Area Sources
Point Sources
Steam Electric Power
Commercial-Institutional
Industrial
EMERY- 0280
Area Sources
Point Sources
Steam Electric Power
Commercial -Institutional
Industrial
GARFIELD - 0300
Area Sources
Point Sources
Steam Electric Power
Commercial-Institutional
Industrial
GRAND r 0320
Area Sources
Point Sources
Steam Electric Power
Commercial -Institutional
Industrial
Particulate
4,600
3,500
1,100
127
39
934
201
200
1
0
0
1
200
200
0
0
0
495
300
195
0
0
195
200
200
0
0
0
0
so2
13,200
1,300
11,900
178
176
11,546
201
20Q
1
0
0
1
300
300
0
0
0
103
100
3
0
0
3
300
300
0
0
0
0
NO
X
9,063
6,500
2,563
147
. 209
2,207
1,301
1,300
1
0
0
1
1,200
1,200
0
0
0
607
600
7
0
0
7
1,400
1,400
0
0
0
0
HC
12,326
8,700
3,626
7
8
3,611
1,802
1,800
2
0
0
2
1,400
1,400
0
0
0
923
900
23
0
0
23
1,400
1,400
0
0
0
0
CO:
51,198
51,100
98
13
11
80
8,726
8,700
26
0
0
26
6,200
6,200
0
0
0
6,535
4,000
2,535
0
0
2,535
6,300
6,300
0
0
0
0
-------
Table 2. (continued)
County
IRON - 0360
Area Sources
Point Sources
Steam Electric Power
Commerc ial - Ins titut ional
Industrial
JUAB - 0380
Area Sources
Point Sources
Steam Electric Power
Commercial-Institutional
Industrial
KANE - 0400
Area Sources
Point Sources
Steam Electric Power
Commercial-Institutional
Industrial
MILLARD - 0560
Area Sources
Point Sources
Steam Electric Power
Commercial-Institutional
MORGAN - 0600
Area Sources
Point Sources
Steam Electric Power
Commerc ial- Ins titut ional
Industrial
Particulate
492
400
92
92
0
0
4,500
4,500
0
0
0
0
100
100
0
0
0
0
300
300
0
0
0
1,472
200
1,272
0
0
1,272
so2
499
400
99
99
0
0
..6,400
6,400
0
0
0
0
100
100
0
0
0
0
300
300
0
0
0
2,796
200
2,596
0
0
2,596
NO
X
1,793
1,700
93
93
0
0
1,100
1,100
0
0
0
0
600
600
0
0
0
0
1,700
1,700
0
0
0
1,050
600
450
0
0
450
HC
7,003
7,000
3
3
0
o
600
600
0
0
0
0
800
800
0
0
0
0
2,100
2,100
0
0
0
706
700
6
0
0
6
CO
9,806
9,800
6
6
0
0
1,900
1,900
0
0
0
0
3,800
3,800
0
0
0
0
10,400
10,400
0
0
0
3,426
3,400
26
0
0
26
-------
Table 2. (continued)
County
PIUTE - 0740
Area Sources
Point Sources
Steam Electric Power
Commercial- Institutional
Industrial
RICH - 0820
Area Sources
Point Sources
Steam Electric Power
Commercial- Institutional
Industrial
SALT LAKE - 0900
Area Sources
Point Sources
Steam Electric Power
Commercial -Institutional
Industrial
SAN JUAN - 0960
Area Sources
Point Sources
Steam Electric Power
Commercial- Institutional
Industrial
SAN PETE - 0980
Area Sources
Point Sources
Steam Electric Power
Commercial -Institutional
Industrial
Particulate
100
100
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
11,776
4,600
7,176
350
334
6,492
200
200
0
0
0
0
600
600
0
0
0
0
so2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
125,122
5,300
119,822
7,082
570
112,170
100
100
0
0
0
0
400
400
0
0
' 0
0
NO
X
200
200
0
0
0
0
200
200
0
0
0
0
41,602
26,100
14,572
5,649
570
8,383
1,000
1,000
0
' 0
0
0
1,200
1,200
0
0
0
0
HC
400
400
0
0
0
0
400
400
0
0
0
0
39,101
37,200
1,901
91
42
1,768
1,200
1,200
0
0
0
0
1,800
1,800
0
0
0
0
CO
1,700
1,700
0
0
0 ,
0
2,100
2,100
0
0
0
0
203,459
202,600
859
208
29
622
6,100
6,100
0
0
0
0
8,700
8,700
0
0
0
0
u>
ro
-------
Table 2. (continued)
County
SKIVER - 1000
Area Sources
Point Sources
Steam Electric Power
Commercial-Institutional
Industrial
SUMMIT! - 1120
Area Sources
Point Sources
Steam Electric Power
Commercial-Institutional
Industrial
TOOELE - 1180
Area Sources
Point Sources
Steam Electric Power
Commercial- Institutional
Industrial
UNITAH - 1200
Area Sources
Point Sources
Steam Electric Power
Commercial-Institutional
Industrial
UTAH - 1220
Area Sources
Point Sources
Steam Electric Power
Commercial-Institutional
Industrial
Particulate
4,392
500
3,892
0
0
3,892
440
200
240
0
0
240
11,598
1,500
10,098
0
250
9,848
2,412
400
2,012
0
0
2,012
14,097
4,600
9,497
131
156
9,210
so2
407
300
107
0
0
107
162
100
62
0
0
62
1,385
400
985
0
135
850
201
200
1
0
0
1
6,418
1,900
4,518
348
285
3,885
NO
X
1,355
1,300
55
0
0
55
858
800
58
0
0
58
3,377
2,800
577
0
129
448
1,318
1,300
18
0
0
18
11,184
9,100
2,084
416
225
1,443
HC
1,905
1,900
5
0
0
5
1,704
1,700
4
0
0
4
3,790
3,500
290
0
13
277
1,603
1,600
3
0
0
3
16,629
12,700
3,929
22
16
3,891
CO
9,208
9,200
8
0
0
8
3,908
3,900
8
0
0
8
17,396
17,300
96
0
34
62
7,901
7,900
1
0
0
1
83,100
74,300
8,800
22
36
8,752
CO
-------
Table 2. (continued)
County
WASATCH - 1260
Area Sources
Point Sources
Steam Electric Power
Commercial -Institutional
Industrial
WASHINGTON - 1280
Area Sources
Point Sources
Steam Electric Power
Commercial- Institutional
Industrial
WAYNE - 1320
Area Sources
Point Sources
Steam Electric Power
Commercial- Institutional
Industrial
WEBER - 1340
Area Sources
Point Sources
Steam Electric Power
Commercial -Institutional
Industrial
Particulate
200
200
0
0
0
0
300
300
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3,354
2,900
454
0
4
450
so2
100
100
0
0
0
0
200
200
0
0
0
0
100
100
0
0
0
0
1,795
1,700
95
0
17
78
NO
X
1,200
1,200
0
o'
0
0
1,700
1,700
0
0
0
0
200
200
0
0
0
0
6,940
6,800
140
0
31
109
HC
1,400
1,400
0
0
0
0
2,100
2,100
0
0
0
0
300
300
0
0
0
0
10,953
10,900
53
0
1
52
CO
6,900
6,900
0
0
0
0
10,800
10,800
0
0
0
0
1,500
1,500
0
0
0
0
57,851
56,800
1,051
0
1
1,050
-------
-3
Table 3. Emission rate (10 tons/day)
GRIDS
All . -
1-106
107-135
136-159
160-171
172-234
235-273
274-312
AR£A 9
mi i
5251.9
4643.9
57.9
115.8
57.9
115.8
144.8
115.8
PART
82,088
3,801
6,096
2,721
2,908
22,225
14,304
30,033
S°2
413,150
302,768
3,911
1,968
1,526
78,469
7,052
17,456
NO
X
200,059
83,513
9,541
5,354
4,089
60,708
20,867
15,987
HC
1*6,887
43,361
14,670
8,471
8,857
62,753
32,351
26,424
CO
755.940
184,220
62,873
27,702
21,764
234,728
139,399
85,254
-------
-3 2
Table 4. General grid data in 10 tons per day per mi
Grid
No.
i
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
_ll
12
it
14
15
16
11
18
19
20
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
3.5
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
*5
46
47
48
49
50
51
S*
JUL
•»
Area
(mi2)
15&.&&A?
38.6100
38.6100
38.6100
9.6525
9.6525
IR.AIOO
9.6525
9.652$
38.6100
- 3&»610Q . .
154.4402
1 56..&6.Q?
9.6525
5.6525
9.6525
9.. 6525
9.6525
9.65?5
9.6525
9.6525
9.6525
9_*_6§2.5
38.6100
38.610O
154.4402
38.6100
38.6100
38.6100
9.6525
9.6525
38.6100
38..610Q . .
38.6100
154.4402
38.6100
38.6100
9.6525
9.«_652_5
9.6525
9.6525
9.6525
9.6525
9.6525
154.4402 ._
38.6100
38.6100
9.6525
9.6525
9.6525
9.6525
9.6525
9.6525
9.6525
P
O 57
1.87
4.34
6.44
5.19
9.60
£.%•*
0.66
0.66
0.66
0.66
0.3P
nr?5
1.34
8.30
0.55
35.86
0.10
101 .11
2.34
_. .. _1.3.9 ..
1.72
Z.08 .
0.10
O.10
0.66
0.85
11.96
0.71
0.32
46.64
22.15
... 1.68
1.76
... .6.4.91. ..... .
16.52
32?. 68
46.64
.... ...4.06.
57.62
4.06
4.06
4.06
4.06
1.72
3.00
1.00. .._
1.93
1.93
19.09
.5..51
58.97
-.15.22 .
6.72*
S02
nr&o
2.99
2.90
4.77.
.10.03 ...
5.P2
*.•*•*
0.5*
0*56
0.56
, .0*56
0,35
n.?A
1.04
4.89
0.42
48.96
0.15
7?. 53
1.76
_ CL..94 . -
1.14
1.36
0.15
0.15
0.49
0.6l_
3.23
0.52.
0.5"
11,67
150.83
.1,11
1.16
1830.62. .„..
3.P5
174.04
11.67
2.»3.0._._.
37.06
2.30
2.30
2.30
2.30
. 1.22
3.35
KUQ8--. .
1.32
1 .32
9.25
. . 2.97
37.69
.11.41
3.27
NO*
•»-*A
6.73
9^78
14.77
. .....15*71-.-
IP. 07
lft-5?
3.55
3.55
3.56
3.S&
3,05
?-ftI
4.70
_15.73
3.40
58*.67
2.47
1&4.6A
6.t>3
5*10
5.77
6,49
2.47
2.47
3.62
- 4fOL
11.84
3.71
B.73
41.46
86.70
...5.. 6.9. _
5.84
... 25.0..3_l .
IP. 35
272.51
41.45
. -13.92
95.74
13.9.2 . ..
13.92
13h92
13.92
10.68
13.59
109.27
10.96
10.96
34.76
1&.93
97.61
36.94
17.30
HC
•»-.1A
6.88
.15.38
20.43
... l/WiO
32.69
IS.,1*
4.15
4,15
4.15
-_A.15_
3.35
7r9fl
6.08
29,01
4.06
_4»37 _ ...
2.67
289.55
8.92
_ 6^62. _
7.61
.8.70
2.67
2.67
4.39
4.91
33.14
4.53
5.04
120.58
6C.50
. 7.49
7.73
.29.09
36.19
15.49
120.56
13.56
134.30
13.56
13.56
13.56
13.56
e.23
11.47
19.33
",71
8.71
47.31
16.97
137.37
37.67
21.16
CO
10.10
27.06
69*24
85.31
...: 43.31
150.14
^T1L
20.46
_-20.4,6
20.48
.... _20..48_ ..
17.27
15.70
28.18
.107.05
19.82
. 18.14
14.73
1 1AO.A1
39.54
.29.23
32.90
-.36.89
14.73
14.73
21.06
23.17
111.C6
21.57
28.04
394.50
65.57
32.45
33.31
168,91
128.99
74.86
394.43
63.76
543. G2
63.76
63.76
63.76
63.76
41.44
52.64
102.04
43.43
43^43
207.36
71,6.5
556.71
136.72.
100.19
36
-------
Table 4. (continued)
Grid
No.
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
7*
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
192
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
tlT
112.
119
114
115
116
IIT
Area
9.6525
9.6525
9.6525
38.6100
154.4402
154.4402
9.6525
9.6525
38.6100
9.6525
9.6525
9.6525
9.6525
9.6525
9.6525
9.6525
9.6525
3". 6100
9.6525
38.6100
38.6100
154.4402
38.6100
39.6100
9.6525
9.6525
38.6100
9.6525
9.6525
9.6525
9.6525
38.6100
9.6525
9.6525
9.6525
154.4402
154.4402
154.4402
9.6525
9.6525
38.6100
9.6525
9.6525
38.6100
38.6100
154.4402
154.4402
154.4402
154.4402
154.4402
154.4402
154.4402
2.4131
2.4131
2.4131
2.4131
2.4131
2.4131
2.4131
2.4131
1.0734
1.0734
1.0734
P
6.15
4.06
4.06
1.54
1.21
0.25
3.41
0.36
0.24
1.20
51.17
1.20
51.32
21.89
2.30
1.20
1.20
1.21
1.20
0.09
1.21
0.20
78.72
0.30
1.66
1.66
2.28
4.78
2.80
3.66
6. $2
1.33
15.37
0.26
0.26
0.23
0.26
3.17
36.39
0.94
1.16
32.55
8.52
4.15
1.47
0.60
0.59
0.31
0.40
0.20
0.21
0.16
41.85
5P.K9
76.84
4.61
35.90
144.37
131.64
1.45
12.94
35.39
1139.79
S02
3.27
_ 2 .30
2.30
1.14
0.65
0^17
5.23
0.23
0.17
0.64
29.32
0.64
25.20
tej.Cji.
1.42
0.64
0.64
Q. 65
0.64
0.10
0.65
0.15
0.24
0.20
0.87
0.87
1.17
1.99
1.43
1.43
6,63
0.71
7.58
o.iu
o.ia
0.17
0.1P
2.21*
21.12
0.51
1.12
19.26
4.23
2.09
0.77
0.35
0.8fi
0.20
0.25
0.15
0.16
0.13
43.03
42. 2 P
55.15
3.38
25.81
111.69
108.05
1.12
9.35
25.44
241.97
^X
16.«1
13.92
13 .92
10.42
3.16
1.66
15.49
1.84
1.65
3.14
77.19
£.,.14 „ ....
PO.P6
37.45
5.61
3.14
3.14
3.15
3.14
1.42
3.15
1.50
1.72
1.74
3.P5
3.85
4.82
7.31
5.62
6.48
14.07
3.34
25.10
1.67
1.67
1.63
1.6*
6.60
59.92
2.73
2.70
53.98
14.49
7.71
3.55
2.20
2.38
1.75
1.P9
1.58
1.60
1.52
32.62
108.55
140.92
10.67
67.09
267.87
248 .40
4.97
25.69
66.18
430.23
HC
IP. 3^
.._13.*A.
13.56
7.Q1
4.05
1.89
11.65
2. 1.5..
1.83
4.03
97.02
4.0A.
115. PO
. . ..49., 9.2
7.58
4.03
4.03
.4*ft3
4.03
1.55
4.03
1.78
1.95
2.00
5.04
5.04
6.43
16.66
7.59
11.28
16.19
4.31
35.61
1.91
1.91
1.86
1.92
8.34
32.15
3.43
3.36
73.58
20.34
10.60
4.61
2.67
2.26
2.03
2.23
1.79
1.81
1.69
102.68
169.60
220.61
15.36
104.27
408.83
370.22
6.38
39.03
102.83
485.21
CO
*>3.73
63.76
63.76
39.69
18.03
9.70
47.22
..:__ lo.ji
9.68
17.94
379.02
J-l*3-4
44R.71
.. _ lfifc«A£
31.62
17.94
17.94
17.96
17.94
8.38
17.96
9.28
9.75
10.14
21. AS
21.85
27.21
82.71
31.69
52.41
57.29
19.02
139.66
9.80
9.80
9.58
9.P3
33.15
311.48
15.66
15.16
278.40
P.O.P2
43.25
20.20
12.70
9.74
10.23
11.02
9.30
9.40
8.95
369.12
681.40
PP5.1P
65.25
420.44
1614.62
1445.29
29.37
.59.79
414.68
4476.15
37
-------
Table 4. (continued)
Grid
No.
118
119
120
171
122
123.
124
-125
126
.122
128
-129-
130
131.
132
<*«
134
ns
136
137
138
t*o
140
141
142
144~
145
146
148
.LML
190
JLSL
192
JLS3_
194
.15JL
196
12Z.
198
.152.
160
16JL
162
164
166
JftZ.
168
JL62.
170
1ZL.
172
-1BL
174
JL22.
176
ITT
178
179
180
Area
1.0734
-U073-4.
1.0734
2-4131
2.4131
1.0734
1.0734
1.0734
2.4131
2.4131
2.4131
2.4131
7.4.131
2.4131
9.6525
£.4131
2.4131
2.4131
9.6525
5^6525
9.6525
2.4131
2.4131
2.4131
2.4131
2.4131
2.4131
2.4131
2.4131
9.6525
.2*6525
2.4131
2.4131
9.6525"
-2*65*5.
2.4131
2.4131
2.4131
9.6525
9.6525
2.4131
2.4131
2.4131
2.4131
2.4131
2.4131
2.4131
2,4131
2.4131
2.4131
2.4131
,; ..; .•;*;• •-•••
173.11
284.39
227.03
1.45
29.37
177.04
22B.75
170.66
1 .45
50.38
253T91
221.70
23.51
4.59
4. SSL.
11.96
-3P.9S
28.90
61-49
21.71
94,15
10.77
~~5.88
49.78
34.28
34^28
~ 58^73
18.38
27.41
'oC85~
"27^SO~
27.82
14.85
5*39"
132 *42
187.83
17.22
5 1 15
.^36,03
108.26
4.52
271.88
4,52.
15.31
'isCsjf
^9.98
374.92
" isTis
750_«4.?
13*87
so2
144.95
~203t97
1.12
-21.13.
147.77
-163-..9A
122.37
1 .12
36.18
17a.2.4_
158.94
16^93
3.37
7.39
-23-.8S--
17.72
13.33
-8S.91-
6.86
_O.6.L_
3.67
21.00
.2U9.5_
21.00
35.92
15.37
20.88
0.6L
0.61
~17~*05~
17.06
13.22
.18^64.
3.38
80.87"
114.67
10.59
24.33..
3.23
J39.05.
66.14
2.85
61.37
7.50
?.77
7.50
9.66
10557.22
73.53
16.09
.9P94.95.
6.83
N0x
357.98
610.07
411 .73
4.97
-.35.33-
371.15
310.09
4.97
93.20
402.12
—18^58-
44.75
10.63
26.53
fll .21
60.84
9A. 4S
46.27
.162.20-.
16.98
"14.20
71.76
~7U76'
. 7^.^9-0
'.21. 31
41-52
59.83
" 4.00
"58^62
58.66
34.37
13.21~
270^6^
382.93^
37.18
82.80
12.73
5_5..4»>
221.69
11.45
205.85
-LU4JL
29.51
~~29^9f
35.99
1231.07
.32S..4.7
154.96
4436.03
27.52
HC
561. bt
1065.42
AA7-33
6.38
562.76
612.50
4*7.17
145.41
S32.18
|6.44
69.07
15.30
38 .7.5
120,79
90.23
190.61
68.37
2B3.QO
34.37
4,96
20.26
153.73
106.61
106.61
111.32
180.95
56.14
83.60
4.96
4.96
-6.8.»3.3
86.90
86.96
45.42
18*78"
-12.9-jJJ.
404.98
573.43
54.73
U3.17
16.05
294.04
331.53
16.13
307.76
39^18
"39*18"
49.84
2161.98
_JHL7_,6.4
43.29
32.R4.61
35.91
CO
2411.28
.A177.BB
5032.15
2SR9.B7
29.37
346-39
2299.60
2632.80
1950.04
584.76
2529135
.-66.15
279. f>0
65.01
147*31
336.46
Sfl^-09
256.14
96,54
. 23*16
79.35
569.77
396.65
4L3..94
396.65
._4JL3.5.4_
669.79
2O1.89
302.79
23.16
-255.97.
324.20
324.42
162.50
73.93
~i492~IV3
21X1.88
206.02
457 ,,49
71.25
_2.83>65
1223.07
64.20
1135.75
~17U2 1
2JL8*17
171.21
215.88
132.86
26.18, 44
175.29
2524.58
157.46
38
-------
Table 4. (continued)
Grid
No.
182 _
183
187~
.188_
189
190
191
_192_
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
20R
209
210
211
212
213
2*4
215
216
217
218
219"
221
_222
223
224
225
-22&
227
228
229
230
231
233
234
235
236
237
-22S.
239
.240
241
243
Area
2.4131
2.4131
2.4131
9.6525
9.6525
2.4131
2.4131
0.6033
0.6033
2.4131
0.6033
0.6033
0.6033
0.6033
0.6033
0.6033
0.6033
0.6033
0.6033
0.6033
0.6033
0.6033
0.6033
0.6033
0.6033
0.6033
0.6033
0.6033
9.6525
9.6525
2.4131
2.4131
2.4131
2.4131
0.6033
0.6033
0.6033
0.6033
0.6033
0.6033
0.6033
0.6033
0.6033
0.6033
0.6033
0.6033
0.6033
0.6033
0.6033
0.6033
2.4131
2.4131
2.4131
2.4131
9.6525
9.6525
2.4131
2.4131
2.4131
2.4131
2.4131
2.4131
2.4131
P
19.25
A3. 87
11.65
7.92
12.17
567.67
159.13
234.88
244.07
635.27
960.58
566 . 78
967.91
916.74
545.63
316.04
477.44
1029.88
859.29
668.64
138.01
SOP .01
369.79
494.00
39.41
753.73
43.09
430.04
35.51
69.12
100.34
68.01
142.09
217. P3
634.14
525.04
494.51
623.28
749.47
334.97
503.2!
494.54
746.21
350.34
721.01
541 .90
549.83
325.08
462.09
542.60
267.98
307.67
12.28
15.28
45.59
97.81
169.83
9* .91
92.78
128.91
358.47
232.35
310.32
so2
10.82
6.83
5.81
4.09
5.92
7876.89
80.03
177.29
136.19
496.47
206.80
332.25
1459.55
433 .46
254.90
152.60
224.32
474.69
394.19
267.56
62.81
232.79-
170.17
223.49
18.63
1251.01
22.39
195.59
16.83
34.99
48.72
33.39
73.64
109.47
294.15
262.23
228.04
285.22
345.26
169.21
233.58
226.94
334.14
163.85
327.23
245.91
250.27
150.84
211.29
246.42
124.21
141 .59
6.10
7.48
21.49
45.61
79.63
45. P*
66.02
93.71
165.39
108.82
141.04
NO
X
118.28
27.52
24.44
19.27
24.77
6532.31
202.60
1011.54
860.33
1301.71
1026.60
1918.57
1646.92
1813.59
901.87
770.99
857. P7
1360.01
1028.92
939.35
124.54
587.35
463.13
411.56
62.92
1934.38
182.52
413.85
57.52
100.98
255.29
188.75
434 .94
586.84
934.99
1805.92
651.01
703.17
975.34
1252.27
746.43
589.18
438.22
583.52
665.44
494.64
544.25
474.13
507.80
505.84
379.86
383.39
25.31
29.47
71.50
143.90
286.39
132.58
423.25
521.15
472.65
390.40
288.49
HC
217.63
35.91
30.85
22.35
31.40
767.17
332.17
1695.10
1523.77
1730.00
1PP5.45
2795.51
2000.01
3326.12
1620.92
1428.82
1407.45
2388.40
1779.92
1622.18
194.46
1005.53
799.52
659.49
94.09
234.00
338.47
683.25
R5.22
133.43
431.44
343.40
653.61
941.80
1660.35
2942.22
1136.44
1201 >71
17C6.12
2178.85
1316.17
1013.21
636.90
968.01
1058.78
810.64
889.12
777.25
853.05
832.75
614.92
616.99
32.29
39.12
108.18
227.17
507.39
222.22
693.62
547.28
821.88
695.87
469.40
CO
1200.68
157.46
136.27
100.62
13P.56
3525.76
1462.76
8325.71
7703.44
8418.63
10293.75
15065.67
10561.07
16666.64
7854.54
7367.77
6143.57
10962.28
7921.06
7789.97
745.89
4413.71
3601. P4
2459.56
401.43
288.19
1831.78
2769.45
364.20
562.19
2053.33
1792.72
2675.08
4166.83
7P42.00
13300.71
5203.84
5231.15
7793.42
10709.13
6179 .4P
4494.33
1647.02
4272.44
3968.85
3200.11
354P.51
3332.05
3624.82
3325.47
2585.07
2526.45
142.29
170.92
460.46
959.36
2461.24
1011.50
3331.96
2590.82
3761.17
3377.05
1862.37
39
-------
Table 4\. (continued)
Grid
No.
JW
245
146
247
248
1*9
250
25A-
252
**?
254
255.
256
-257.
258
2«9
260
261
262
-263U
264
2A5
266
267
268
JL49_
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
ztz
28i
284
JZJBL
286
287
288
Zfi2_
2*0
291
292
193.
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
332
30?
304
305
306
Area
5.4i3i
.,2,4131
2.4131
2.4131
2.4131
9.6525
9.6525
2.4131
2.4131
2-4131
2.4131
-i.AJLSJ
2.4131
7.4131
2.4131
2-4131
2.4131
2.4131
2.4131
9.65?5
9.6525
9.6525
2.4131
2,4131
2.4131
2.4131
2.4131
2.4131
2.4131
2.4131
2.4131
2.4131
2.4131
2.4131
9.6525
9.6525
2.4131
2.4131
2.4131
2.4131
9.6525
9.6525
2.4131
2.4131
2.4131
2.4131
2.4131
2.4131
2.4131
2.4131
2.4131
0.6033
0.6033
0.6033
0.6033
2.4131
0.6033
0.6033
0.6033
0.6033
2.4131
2.413)
P
204.43
... -331*33 ...
152.61
183.16
3.32
46.73
57.22
95.35
66.94
180-55
229.83
--2.43.87,
177.09
197.37
134.46
1 «i1 -4.A
168.24
1^3.43
11,26
34.17
4.70
63-29
136.34
42.94
51.45
64.25
100.10
34.43
6.88
6-32
37.35
27.87
67.89
33. SO
12.79
217*. 10
33.77
146.95
57.62
136.49
25.74
10.17
107.28
125.42
151.43
280.76
62.61
407.00
0.87
0.87
110.95
28.03
361.76
2*1.59
678.53
239.21
24.34
806.50
202.22
357.03
80.23
507.24
25.13
S02
93.93
15i^2f_.-
68.96
f»5 O3
1.96
..22.01 .
31.31
43 .A9 -
49.24
7PS-22
124.35
_111.25
81.15
. 9Q...01- -
60.90
S7 -C.fi
78.78
_75 .92.
5.63
20,66
2.60
39.57
63.40
20.26
24.20
30.11
46.67
16.33
3.61
3.35
18.35
20.90
33.32
16.47
6.32
1272.48
16.60
72.05
114.24
152*68
11.14
ft. 63
52.62
68.69
74.25
255.48
30.73
47Q.OO
0.48
0.48
60.51
12.70
177.30
13«.02
323.26
119.97
24.14
386.47
102.47
174.9R
39.36
23.83
12.37
wov
A
241.2"
...__.3.4;5.»22
111.31
26-2.25
12.89
73.08_
90.99
86.34
119.42
323.59
338.45
24. 6 .57
194.95
182.68 -
104.69
1 •> \ . 44
277.79
234. 9O
23.90
39.02
14.81
102.77
197.33
67.83
79.63
97.38
147.08
56. C3
17.83
17.04
59.19
49-43
106.55
53n22
21.11
417.22
53.65
2^9.13 .
211.46
333.76
38.31
19.51
167.63
200.70
236.09
372.34
98.36
629.96
2.63
2.63
174.62
41.11
562.24
437.91
587.29
_ 510.15
47.37
311.89
484.26
554.91
125.68
61.43_
40.24
HC
.._.5*Z;93.
164.70
421.64
11»»7
.11C^75._.
134,11
131.15
174.95
479.37
522.03
4os.ai
323.02
..292-^12-
155.96
173-1 O
490.73 .
376»7O
29.96
fll.53
15.02
147.36
314.96
102.15
121.55
150.71
232.39
82 .76
19.99
18.70
P4.64
62.71
152.75
76.05
29.86
1208.80
76.66
32.9 106_
85.75
261.65
50.81
23.63
240.60
280.28
339.07
374.64
140.98
557^37
3.23
3.28
256.04
7Jr«9°
808.16
629.35
788.85
834.68
54.30
1147.09
802.86
7V7.61
180.27
82.37
57.39
CO
2129.06
535.09
1774.72
56.67
4.71.. 31
557.59
...... 49.6.. 9 6
775.85
19>3.?7
2148.74
—167.6. 12
13P0.23
1147.^26
533.85
ASS-41
2369.60
<58^T3(
132.55
337,32
69.91
&01.SO
1327.46
_A3i.21
516.54
638.80
961.27
353. 89
90.75
,._a5-.3_Q
32*. 62
227.39
591.08
295.52
117.50
JL32&m3a
297. »7
1270.57
303.54
98^.46
197.41
85.13
929.65
1065.36
1309.14
1466.28
545.73
2.385.29
15.07
15.07
Ip04.62
311.69
3116.94
2427.81
22R7.27
3940.58
183.42
3898.14
3878.91
3076.28
697.16
305.08
223.58
40
-------
Table 4. (continued)
Grid
No.
307
.2PJL
309
.lift.
311
Jtl£
Area
Z.4131
2.4131
2.4131
2.4131
2.4131
9.6S25
P
25.13
22.56
182.09
21.95
73.44
22.06
so2
12.37
18.30
21.94
10.81
36.03
10.86
NO
X
40.24
41.20
70.72
35.31
115.15
35.48
HC
57.39
50.88
«3.«*
50.29
165.12
50.54
CO
223.58
181.77
649*. 59
196.22
638.78
197.19
41
-------
Table 5. Emission factor (Ib/unit)
Category
Residential
Bituminous Coal
Distillate Oil
Natural Gas
Commercial Institutional
Bituminous Coal
Distillate Oil
Residual Oil
Natural Gas
Industrial
Bituminous Coal
Distillate Oil
Residual Oil
Natural Gas
Diesal Fuel
Off Highway
Railroads
Incineration
Industrial
Commercial
Off-Highway Gasoline
Aircraft
Military
Civil
Commercial
Unit
Ton
IO3
6
10°
Ton
IO3
IO3
IO6
Ton
IO3
IO3
IO6
IO3
IO3
Tons
Tons
IO3
LTO
LTO
LTO
A = Fuel Ash Content
S = Fuel Sulfur Content
gal
ft
gal
gal
ft3
gal
gal
ft3
gal
gal
gal
CYC
CYC
CYC
Part
20.
10.
19.
5.
15.
23.
19.
13.
10.
23.
18.
13.
25.
12.
12.
8.
19.
0.
19.
0
0
0
8A
0.
0
0
OA
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
9
57
5
S02 NO,
38
142
0
38
142
157
0
38
142
157
0
27
65
1
1
5
3
0
4
.OS
.OS
.6
.OS
.OS
.OS
.6
.OS
.OS
.OS
.6
.0
.0
.5
.5
.0
.8
.11
.3
3.
12.
50.
9;
60.
60.
100.
15.
12.
60.
180.
370.
75.
2.
2.
176.
9.
0.
12.
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
6
51
2
HC
20
3
8
2
3
3
8
1
3
3
40
37
50
10
10
553
46
2
46
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.3
.52
.0
CO
90.0
5.0
20.0
7.2
0.2
0.2
20.0
2.0
5.0
0.2
0.4
225.0
70.0
20.0
20.0
3030.0
49.7
14.4
111.0
42
-------
Table 6. Factors for area source emissions from mobile sources
CATEGORY
Limited Access Roads
Light Duty - Gasoline
Heavy Duty - Gasoline
Heavy Duty - Diesel
Rural. Roads
Light Duty - Gasoline
Heavy Duty - Gasoline
Heavy Duty - Diesel
Suburban Roads
Light Duty - Gasoline
Heavy Duty - Gasoline
Heavy Duty - Diesel
Urban Roads
Light Duty - Gasoline
Heavy Duty - Gasoline
Heavy Duty - Diesel
PART
0.300
0.300
1.200
0.300
0.300
1.200
0.300
0.300
1.200
0.300
0.300
1.200
SOX
0.180
C.180
2.400
0.180
0.180
2.400
0.180
0.180
2.400
0.180
0.180 .
2.400
NOX
4.300
10.000
34.000
4.300
10.000
34.000
4.300
10.000
34.000
4.300
10.000
34.000
HC
7.800
16.000
3.400
8.000
17.000
3.400
• 8.800
19.000
3.400
10.000
23.000
3.400
CO
34.000
58.000
20.000
37.000
63.000
20.000
45.000
76.000
20.000
59.000
100.000
20.000
•p-
u>
-------
APPENDIX A
Motor Vehicle Emission Calculations
All data for the following calculations are taken from NEDS area source
forms. The first step in estimating motor vehicle emissions is to establish
the mileage ratios for the different classes of vehicles:
1) Multiply gasoline fuel for light vehicles times 1000 times 13.6 (mpg) ,
2) Multiply gasoline fuel for heavy vehicles times 1000 times 8.4 (mpg),
3) Multiply diesel fuel for heavy vehicles times 1000 times 5.0 (mpg).
Add the products - SUM of vehicle miles: traveled. (M_)
Obtain ratio of vehicle mile total for category of vehicle.
(3)
SUM
If any measured vehicle miles are filled in, proceed as follows:
Then multiply each ration from above times each "Measured Vehicle Miles"
category, times appropriate emission factor, i.e.
Limited Access Road - miles (M^) times 10,000 times ILD times appropriate
emission factor plus M^ times 10,000 R,jnr, times appropriate emission factor
plus M.. times 10,000 R,,nn times appropriate emission factor.
I times sum is the emissions for limited access roads in tons
453.6 2000
Rural Roads - miles (M_) times 10,000 times R,D times appropriate emission
factor plus M times 10,000 times R,,-.,, times appropriate emission factor plus
K HL/Cj
M times 10,000 Rrrnn times appropriate emission factor.
,c, , 2000 x sum is the emissions for rural roads in tons .
44
-------
Suburban Roads - miles (M ) times 10,000 R._ times appropriate emission
factor plus Mg times 10,000 times R™r times appropriate emission factor plus
M_ times 10,000 RtrnD times appropriate emission factor.
453.6 x 2000
x gum is the emissions for suburban roads in tons
Urban Roads - miles (Mu) times 10,000 R__ times appropriate emission
factor plus Mu times 10,000 times Rjny, times appropriate emissions factor
plus Mu times 10,000 times Rrmn times appropriate emission factor.
453.6 x 2000 x sum *8 t*ie emissions for urban roads in tons
45
-------
REFERENCES
1. "Guide for Compiling Comprehensive Emission Inventory", U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Office of Air Programs, GAP Publication No. AETD-1135.
2. "Compilation of Air Pollutant Emission Factors", U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Office of Air Programs, CAP Publication No. AP 42-1,
1972
3. "Compilation of Air Pollutant Emission Factors", U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Office of Air Programs, OAP Publication No. AP 42-2,
1973.
4. "Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans", Federal Register 38,
No. 92, 12702-12711, May 14, 1973.
5. 1970 Census of Housing, "General Housing Characteristics", HC (1) A
Series, U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census, Washington,
D.C.
6. "Coal-Bituminous and Lignite", (preprint from Minerals Yearbook). U.S.
Department of the Interior, Bureau of Mines, Washington, D.C., 1972.
7. Mineral Industry Surveys, "Sales of Fuel Oil and Kerosene", U.S. Depart-
ment of the Interior, Bureau of Mines, Washington, D.C., 1972.
8. 1970 Census of Population, "General Economic and Social Characteristics",
PC-C series, U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Census, Washington,
D.C., 1970.
9. 'Vehicle Miles on Utah Highways 1972", Utah State Department of Highways,
Salt Lake City, Utah, 1973.
10. "Statewide Mileage, Travel, and Nbnfatal and Fatal Injury Accidents, 1972",
Utah State Department of Highways, Salt Lake City, Utah, 1973.
11. "Census of Agriculture, County Data", U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau
of the Census, Washington, B.C., 1969.
12. 1970 Census of Population and Housing, "Census Tracts, Provo-Orem, Utah,
SMSA", U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census, Washington, D.C.
13. 1970 Census of Population and Housing, "Census Tracts, Ogden, Utah, SMSA",
U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census, Washington, D.C.
14. 1970 Census of Population and Housing, "Census Tracts, Salt Lake City,
Utah SMSA", U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census, Washington,
D.C.
46
-------
15. "Technical Support Document for Porposed Transportation Control
Strategy for the Wasatch Front Intrastate AQCR", prepared by GCA
Technology Division for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, June,
1973.
16. "Transportation Controls to Reduce Motor Vehicle Emissions in Salt Lake
City, Utah", prepared by GCA Technology Division for the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, December, 1972.
47
-------
TECHNICAL REPORT DATA
(Please read Instructions on the reverse before completing)
1. REPORT NO.
EPA-450/3-74-005
3. RECIPIENT'S ACCESSION»NO.
4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE
State of Utah Compilation of NEDS Data
6. REPORT DATE
December 1973
6. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE
7. AUTHOR(S)
R. Hall, J. Bartlett, N. Surprenant
8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NO.
9. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS
GCA Corporation
GCA Technology Division
Bedford, Massachusetts 01730
10. PROGRAM ELEMENT NO.
2AE132
11. CONTRACT/GRANT NO.
68-02-1006
12. SPONSORING AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS
Environmental Protection Agency
National Air Data Branch
Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
13. TYPE OF REPORT AND PERIOD COVERED
Final August-November 1973
14. SPONSORING AGENCY CODE
15. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES
16. ABSTRACT
National Emissions Data System (NEDS) point and area source coding forms were
completed for the State of Utah. A grid system for reporting emissions in the
Salt Lake City metropolitan area was developed. The report discusses the .methods
used to collect the data and presents summaries of the data.
17.
KEY WORDS AND DOCUMENT ANALYSIS
DESCRIPTORS
b.IDENTIFIERS/OPEN ENDED TERMS
c. COSATI Field/Group
Emission inventory
Point sources
Area sources
Grid system
Utah
18. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT
Release Unlimited
19. SECURITY CLASS (ThisReport)
Unclassified
21. NO. OF PAGES
52
20. SECURITY CLASS (Thtspage)
Unclassified
22. PRICE
EPA Form 2220-1 (9-73)
-48-
------- |