DECEMBER 1974
IMPLEMENTATION PLAN REVIEW
FOR
FLORIDA
APPENDICES
U. S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
-------
APPENDIX A
State Implementation Plan Background
Property Of
EPA Library
RTPNC 27711
-------
Table A-l. Florida Air Pollution Control Areas
Demographic Information
Proposed
Air Quality
Control Region
Mobile-Pensacola-
Panama City- Southern
Mississippi
(Ala., Miss.)
Central Florida
Jacksonville-
Brunswick (Ga.)
Southeast Florida
Southwest Florida
West Central Florida
Federal
Number
5
48
49
50
51
52
1970
Population
(Miilons)
2.1
.9
1.3
2.4
.4
1.5
Area
/thousand^
\sq. mi. J
33.6
5,6
24.2
8.7
7.7
8.0
Population
Density
/people per\
\sq. mi. )
63
167
55
279
46
189
Particulates SG|
1 1
2 3
1 2
2 3
3 3
1 1
NO^ TSP Counties
3 (0)
3 (0)
3 (1) Duval
3 (0)
3 (0)
3 (3) Polk, Hillsboroug
SOX Counties
(0)
(0)
(1) Duval
(2)
(0)
h, (3) Polk,
Pinellas
Hillsborough,
Pinellas
aAs of November 26, 1974.
-------
JACKSONVILLE
ISOHOtll
TSP DESIGNATION
S02 DESIGNATION
LEGEND
® Plicn ul 100.000 Of more
• Places of 50.000 lo 100.000 inhibilints
O PIK« of 25 000 lo 50.000 inhibition ouliidf SMS*
:
-------
Table A-2. Florida Ambient Air Quality Standards
Federal
State
Bade, Broward
Counties
Primary
Secondary
Except Bade,
Broward, Palm
Beach Counties
, Palm Beach
Total Suspended
Annual
75 (G)
60 (G)
60 (G)
50
Particulate
24 Hr
260a
150a
150a
180
All
Annual
80 (A)
—
60 (A)1
8.6(A)
concentrations in ygms/m3
Sulfur Bioxide
24-Hr 3-Hr 4-Hr 1-Hr
365a
13003 ---
3 260a'b 1300a ---
28.6 --- 57.2 286
Nitrogen Bioxide
Annual
100 (A)
100 (A)
100 (A)
100 (A)
Not to be exceeded more than once per year.
mas adopted based on original EPA policy which was rescinded July, 1973.
(A) Arithmetic mean
(B) Geometric mean
-------
Table A-3. Florida AQCR Air Quality Status, TSP
Number of Stations Exceeding
TSP Concentration (pgm/ra3) Ambient Air Quality Standards
Highest Tteading
AQCR No. Stations
No. Reporting Annual 24-Hr
5b . 35
48 . 5
49b 34
50 43
51 3
52 19
a!973 air quality
Interstate.
'Violations based
Formula:
Maximum of
142 1405
138
75 1645
347
138
950
2nd Highest Reading
Primary ' Secondary
24-Hr Annual 24-Hr1- Annual % 24-Hr1- %
998 2 3 2 6 11 31
78 --- o — - 00
1525 0 10 2 6 12 35
262 — 1 — 4 9
83 - — 0 — - - o 0
321 — 1 — - 5 26
1 Reduction Required Controlling
to Meet Standards Standard
+88 24 Hr
-147 24 Hr -
+92 24 Hr
+48 24 Hr
-124 24 Hr
+59 24 Hr
data in National Air Data Bank as of June 7, 1974.
on 2nd highest reading
[(2nd Highest 24-Hr -
at any station.
24-Hr Secondary Standard^ lf(Q /Annual - Annual Secondary Standard)
x ion
Florida inarticulate background concentration: 29 jigm/m3
Note that this is a first approximation, EPA ao longer encourages the uss of rollback calculations as a means of demonstrating NAAQS attainment.
However, in the absence of dispersion modeling results, it is the.only measure available and it is used here.
-------
Table A-4. Florida AQCR Air Quality Status,
Number of Stations Exceeding
AQCR
No.
5b
48
49b
50
51
52
No. Stations Reporting
24 Hr
27
1
16
4
1
16
Cont.
4
0
1
5
0
0
Highest
Annual
8
13
6
22
S0? Concentration (ji
Reading 2nd Hig
24-Hr
480
100
1304
299
2
125
gm/m3)
best Reading
24-Hr
33
7
636
157
2
71
Ambient Air
Quality
Standards
Primary Secondary
Annual 24-Hrc 3-Hrc
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
---
% Reduction Required
to Meet Standards"
-900
-5114
+43
-132
-18150
-264
Controlling
Standard
Annual
24 Hr
24 Hr
24 Hr
24 Hr
Annual
a!973 air quality data in National Air Data Bank as of June 7, 1974.
Interstate.
'Violations- based on 2nd highest reading at any station.
Maximum of
["
(5
d Highest 24-Hr - 24-Hr Standard)
2nd Highest 24-Hr J
x.iuu
(t
, ^
Annual - Annual Standard
Annual
-) x 100
Note that this is a first approximation. EPA no longer encourages the use of rollback calculations as a means of demonstrating NAAQS
attaiiment. However, in the absence of dispersion modeling results, it is the only measure available and it is used here.
-------
Table A-5. Florida Fuel Combustion Source Summary
Total Emissions
4 Emissions from
AQCR Power
No. Plants
5e 3
48 5
49e 8
50 11
51 2
52 10f
Total 39
Other Fuel Combustion Area
Point Sources" Sources0
4
0
12
8
3
2
29
10
6
25
8
8
10
67
(103 tons/year)
TSP S02
230.9
13.8
88.4
30.0
16.5
63.3
442.9
491.7
50.3
214.6
106.3
30.8
402.9
1,296.6
Florida Fuel Combustion Source;
TSP SOi
28
29
28
36
31
45
31
75
95
87
84
78
91
84
aFlorida fossil-fuel-fired plants
"Florida plants contributing 90% of the participate and SO- emissions
Florida counties
dAQCR total
Interstate
fAdditional plant scheduled for 1974-75
-------
Table A-6. Florida Emissions Summary , TSP
A3CR
S Florida
Other
Total
48
49 Florida
Other
Total
50
51
52
Total
Total
(lO3 tons/yr)
56.4
174.5
230.9
13.8
69.6
18.8
88.4
30.0
16.5
63.3
442.9
%
13
39
52
3
16
_1
20
7
4
14
100
Electricity Generation
(103 tons/yr;) %
9.6
24.1
33.7
3.2
4.3
_L£
5.2
4.4
.9
27.0
74.5
.17
14
15
23
6
5
5
-5
5
43
17
Industrial/Commercial/
Institutional Point Source
(103tons/yr) %
8.3
17.3
25.6
.4
11.4
.-kl
18.1
5.5
4.1
.8
54.6
15
10
11
3
16
36
21
18
25
1
12
Area Source
(10 3 tons/yr)
.4
4.3
4.7
.4
.9
.8
1.7
• 8
.1
.7
8.5
%
1
2
2
3
1
4
2
3
1
1
2
Emissions data from reference 7.
-------
Table A-7, Florida Emissions Summary , SCL
A3CR
5 Florida
Other
Total
48
49 Florida
Other
Total
50
51
52
Total
Total
(103 tons/yr)
230.9
260.8
491.7
50.3
168.0
46.6
214.6
106.3
30.8
402.9
1,296.6
%
18
.20.
38
4
13
_4
17
8
2
31
100
Electricity Generation
(103 tons/yr) %
163,7
167.8
331.5
44.8
114.6
11.9
126.5
78.7
21.2
360.2
963.0
71
64
67
89.
68
.25
59
74.
69
«9.
74
Industrial/Commercial/
Institutional Point Source
(103 tons/yr) %
27.1
7.5
34.6
.4
33.5
21.3
54.8
5.7
2.2
2.5
100.2
12
3
7
1
20
46
26
5
7
1
8
3 Area Source
(10 tons/yr)
1.0
4.2
5.2
2.6
3.4
1.3
4.7
5.3
.6
4.1
22.5
f
<1
2
1
5
2
3
2
5
2
1
2
Missions data from reference 7.
-------
Table A-8. Florida AQCR Required Emission Reduction3
Estimated Particulate Estimated SC>2
AQCR Emission Reduction Required Emission Reduction Required
5b
48
49b
50
51
52
%
+88
-147
+92
+48
-124
+59
10 3 tons /year
+203.2
-20.3
+81.3
+14.4
-20.5
+37.3
%
-900°
-5114°
+43
-132
-18150°
-264
10 3 tons/year
-4425.3
-2572.3
+92.3
-140.3
-5590.2
-1063.7
o
Based on a proportional change of emissions to air quality. Note that this is a first approximation
EPA no longer encourages the use of rollback calculations as a means of demonstrating NAAQS attainment
However, in the absence of modeling results, it is the only measure available and it is used here.
Interstate.
Q
Exceptionally large negative numbers indicate current air quality is very good. In this range, the
proportional calculations do not give a good picture of allowable emission increases. They are
included here only as general indicators.
-------
Table A.r9j Florida Fuel Combustion Emission Regulations0
SO.
Existing Sources
<_ 250 x 106 Btu/hr > 250 x 106 Btu/hr
Latest reasonably 1.1 lbs/106 Btu for liquid fuel,
available technology 2 hour average
1.5 lbs/106 Btu for solid fuel,
2 hour average
New Sources
^ 250 u: 106 Btu/hr
Latest reasonably
available technology.
> 250 x 106 Btu/hr
.8 lbs/106 Btu for liquid fuel,
2 hour average
1.2 lbs/106 Btu for solid fuel,
2 hour average
Opacity of Ringelmann #1; Ringleman #2
permitted for 2 minutes per hour.
Opacity of Ringelmann #1; Ringelmann #2 permitted
for 2 minutes per hour.
Particulates
Latest reasonably
available technology .1 lbs/106 Btu, 2 hr average
Latest reasonably
available technology
.1 lbs/106 Btu, 2 hr average
Applied to fossil fuel steam generators.
A variance procedure is included in the regulations (Section 17-2.11) which gives the Florida Department
of Pollution Control authority to modify sulfur oxide emission limits for fossil fuel steam generators
upon receipt of sufficient evidence documenting the unavailability of low sulfur fuels.
-------
APPENDIX B
Regional Air Quality Assessment
-------
AQCR
Table B-l. Florida AQCR Candidacy Assessment for Particulate Regulation Relaxation
Stations Counties with Estimated
with Particulate Expected Proposed Total Particulate % Emissions Emission Reduction
Air Quality Attainment Particulate AQMA Emissions from Florida Fuel Required for NAAQS Particulate
Violations b Date Designations (103 tons/yr) Combustion (103 tons/yr) Priority
Mobile-
Pensacola 5
Central
Florida 48
Jacksonville-
Brunswick 49
Southeast
Florida 50
Southwest
Florida 51
West Central
Florida 52
. 13 7/75
0
13 7/75
4 7/75
0
. 5 7/75
0
0
1
0
0
3
230.9
13.8
88.4
30.0
16.5
63.3
28
29
28
36
31
45
+203.2
- 20,3
+ 81.3
+ 14.4
- 20.5
+ 37.3
1
2
1
2
3
1
Interstate
Tbtal number of stations given in Table A-3.
-------
Table B-2. Florida AQCR Candidacy Assessment for SO- Regulation Relaxation
AQCR
Mobile-
Pens acola 5
Central
Florida 48
Jacksonville-
Brunswick 49
Southeast
Florida 50
Southwest
Florida 51
West Central
Florida 52
Stations
with S02
Air Quality
Violations"
0
0
3
0
0
0
Counties with
Expected Proposed
Attainment S02 AQMA
Date Designations
0
0
7/75 ' 1
0
0
3
Total S02
Emissions
(103 tons/yr)
491.7
50.3
214.6
106.3
30.8
402.9
\ Emissions
from Ohio Fuel
Combustion
75
95
87
84
78
91
Estimated
Emission Reduction
Required for NAAQS
(103 tons/yr)
-4425.3
-2572.3
+ 92.3
- 140.3
-5590.2
-1063.7
S02.
Priority
1
3
2
3
3
1
Interstate
rotal number of stations given on Table A-4,
-------
APPENDIX C
Power Plant Assessment
-------
Table C-l. Florida Power Plant Assessment
SIP .
1975 Capacity Estimated 1975 Fuel Use Regulations Allowable
AOCR Plant
5C Crist
Lansing- Smith
Scholz
48 Cape Kennedy
Sanford
Turner
Indian River
Lake Highland
49C Palatka
Suwanee River
Gainesville
J. D. Kennedy
Northside
Souths ide
S. 0. Purdom
A. B. Hopkins
Mw
1229.0
340.0
98.0
804.1
1028.5
201.6
638.8
103.8
109.5
147.0
165.0
249,6
595.0
356.6
143.0
126.0
Fuel
Coal
Oil
Gas
Coal
Oil
Coal
Oil
Gas
Oil
Gas
Oil
Gas
Oil
Gas
Oil
Gas
Oil
Gas
Oil
Gas
Oil
Gas
Oil
Oil
Oil
Oil
Gas
Oil
Gas
Quantitya
2,011
46,769
21,143
771
197
218
185,766
16,580
123,247
3,372
11,802
8,535
75,328
19,336
2,073
2,909
38,766
751
42,168
3,910
- 39,732
66
79,548
443,058
130,158
6,258
6,232
252
2,067
\ S
.9
.8
.9
1.0
1.0
1.0
.8
1.0
.8
1.0
1.0
1.0
.7
1.0
.7
.8
1.1
1.1
1 S
2-3
> 3
1-2
-------
Table C-l. Florida Power Plant Assessment (contd.)
SIP
AQCR Plant
50 Cutler
Lauderdale
Miami
Port Everglades
Riviera
Turkey Point
H. D. King
Key West
Stock Island
Lake Worth
Vero Beach
51 Fort Meyers
Avon Park
52 Bar tow
Bayboro
Crystal River
Higgins
1975 Capacity
Mw
351.5
312.5
46.0
1254.6
739.6
804.1
106.0
68.8
37.0
74.1
124.2
558.3
61.0
494.4
51.3
964.3
138.0
Estimated
Fuel
Oil
Gas
Oil
Gas
Oil
Gas
Oil
Gas
Oil
Gas
Oil
Gas
Oil
Gas
Oil
Oil
Oil
Gas
Oil
Gas
Oil
Oil
Gas
Oil
Gas
Oil
Coal
Oil
Oil
Gas
1975 Fuel Use
Quantity3
24,528
11,974
39,312
10,135
294
2,526
311,430
27,612
135,660
17,187
186,228
17,459
22,832
4,075
29,148
1,470
701
2,232
10,248
4,142
166,824
6,552
1,718
179,130
3,065
20,454
708
167,622
42,084
2,336
Regulations Allowable
IS IS
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
.8
1.0
-
1.0
.8
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
.9 > 3
1.0
1.0
-------
Table C-l. Florida Power Plant Assessment (contd.)
SIP ,
1975 Capacity Estimated 1975 Fuel Use Regulations Allowable
AQCR
52
(contd.)
Plant
Inglis
Big Bend
F. J. Gannon
Hookers Point
Larson Memorial
Plant #3
Anclote 1 § 2
Mw
53.8
1336.5
1270.4
232.6
120.0
218.2
1030.0
Fuel
Oil
Gas
Coal
Coal
Oil
Oil
Gas
Oil
Gas
Oil
Gas
Quantity3
5,376
1,695
2,024
2,213
103,554
30,618
1,864
47,077
749
175,556
4,814
IS % S
1.0
.7
.9
1.0
1.0
.8
.8
aCoal quantity is 10 tons/yr, oil quantity is 10 gals/yr, gas quantity is 10 ft /yr.
Estimates are based on 1971 fuel use patterns.
Maximum allowable % S is assumed to be 1971 \ S used unless modeling results
("Modeling Analysis of Power Plants for Compliance Extensions in 51 Air Quality
Control Regions," Report prepared under EPA Contract No. 68-02-0049, Walden
Research Division, Cambridge, Mass., December 17, 1973) show a lower % S allowable.
clnterstate.
-------
Table C-2. Florida Power Plant Evaluation Summary
S02
AQCR
5C
48
49C
50
51
52
Florida
Total
Fuel
Coal
Oil
Gas
Coal
Oil
Gas
Coal
Oil
Gas
Coal
Oil
Gas
Coal
Oil
Gas
Coal
Oil
Gas
Coal
Oil
Gas
1975 Fuel Required by
Existing Regulations3
< 14
2,782
46,769
21,143
198,575
50,732
612,948
13,026
33,080
97,342
1,718
4,945
222,633
7,727
1,114,005
183,961
1-21 2-3t > 3%
218
197
199,641
166,992
727,301
173,376
548,838
218
1,816,345
1975 Fuel Required by
Modified Regulations0
< 1% 1-2% 2-3%
218 2,011
NA MA
> 31
771
No modeling results available.
No modeling results available.
No modeling results available.
No modeling results available.
4,237
222,633
708d
Incomplete data.
a 33
Fuel requirements based on 1971 fuel use patterns at 1975 consumption rates. Coal in 10 tons/yr, oil in 10
gals/yr, gas in 106 ft3/yr.
allowable $ S is 1971 % S unless modeling indicates a lower value. Data from Modeling Analyses of
Power Plants for Compliance Extensions in 51 Air Quality Control Regions, U.S. EPA, Walden Div 7 Abcor, Inc.,
Dec. 17, 1972. '
clnterstate.
Tteta from Modeling Analysis of Power Plants for Fuel Conversion, U.S.E.P.A. , Walden Research Division of
Abcor Inc. June 1974.
-------
APPENDIX D
Industrial, Commercial, Institutional Point Source Assessment
-------
Table D-l. Florida Industrial/Commercial/Institutional Source Assessment
AQCR
5C
48
49C
50
51
52
Planta Fuel
St. Joe Paper Oil
International Paper Oil
None
Container Corp. of
America Oil
ITT Rayonier Oil
Hudson Pulp § Paper Oil
St. Regis Paper Oil
None
None
None
Estimated
Fuel b
Consumption
52,397
29,957
77,187
29,925
51,234
30,603
SIP
Regulations
0 C1
•6 o
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
aFlorida plants contributing to 90% of AQCR's SO- and particulate emissions
and greater than 250 x 106 Btu/hr heat input.
Oil in 103 gals/yr
c
Interstate
-------
Table D-2. Florida Industrial/Commercial/Institutional Source Evaluation Summary
Fuel
Required by Existing Regulations
AQCR Fuel < 1% 1-2% 2-31 > 31
5d Oil 82,354b
48 No Plants0
49d Oil 188,949b
50 No Plants0
51 No Plants0
52 No Plants0
Includes fuel use for sources listed in Table D-l only. Oil in 10 gals/yr.
Oil is required to be II S by current SIP regulations.
°No plants contributing to 90% of the AQCR emissions and falling under Florida
SIP emission regulations (i.e., over 250x10^ Btu/hr heat input).
Interstate.
-------
APPENDIX E
Area Source Assessment
-------
Table E-l. Florida Area Source Fuel Use
AQCR
5a
48
49a
50
51
52
Total
Coal
(10 3 tons/yr)
1.7% Sulfur, 7.41 Ash
26
.04
6
30
0
.2
62.24
Distillate Oil
(10 3 gals/yr)
.3% Sulfur
42,210
23,270
61,050
16,840
2,810
40,230
186,410
Residual Oil
(103 gals/yr)
1.6% Sulfur
16,540
17,070
24,000
39,180
4,270
25,960
127,020
Natural Gas
(106 ft3/yr)
123,780
7,700
20,520
24,430
2,840
12,310
191,580
Interstate
-------
APPENDIX F
Fuels Assessment
-------
Table F-l. Florida Clean Fuels Analysis Summary
AQCR
58
48
49g
50
51
52
State Total
Fuel
Coal
Oil
Oil
Oil
Oil
Oil
Coal
Oil
Coal
Oil
Existing
<1% S
2,782
46,769
198,575
612,948
33,080
4,945
223,633
7,727
1,114,005
,
Regulations Clean Fuel Requirementsa
1-2% S 2-3% S > 3% S
218
82,551
199,641
355,941
727,301
173,376
548,838
218
2,087,648
Minimum Clean Fuels Savings
Through Regulation Modification'3
< 1% S 1-2% S
2,782 0
d
d
e
i
d
j
d
708C - ;
f
3,490h
NA NA
alncludes fuel use for power plants (Table C-l) and industrial/commercial/institutional point sources (Table D-l)
only. Coal in 10^ tons/yr, oil in 10^ gals/yr.
Based on modeling results for power plants only.
cBased on modeling results for 17% of 1975 capacity.
Although no modeling data is available, the regional air quality data indicates an increase in fuel sulfur content
would not present NAAQS attainment problems.
Although no modeling data is available, the regional air quality data indicates no increase in fuel sulfur content
could be tolerated.
Although only limited modeling data is available, the regional perspective indicates a potential problem with NAAQS
maintenance if fuel sulfur content is increased.
^Interstate.
Based on modeling results for 16% of 1975 capacity.
-------
REFERENCES
1. Modeling Analysis of Power Plants for Compliance Extensions in 51 Air
Quality Control Regions, report prepared under Contract No. 68-02-0049
for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Walden Research Division
of Abcor, Inc., Cambridge, Mass., December 17, 1973.
2. Steam Electric Plant Factors, 1973, National Coal Association, Washington,
D.C., January 1974.
3. Power plant data file, unpublished, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
Research Triangle Park, N.C.
4. Power plant S02 emission estimates, unpublished data, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, N.C.
5. National Emissions Data Systems data bank, U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Research Triangle Park, N.C.
6. Modeling Analysis of Power Plants for Fuel Conversion, report prepared
for Source Receptor Analysis Branch, U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Walden Research Division of Abcor, Inc., Cambridge, Mass., Sept-
ember 9, 1974.
7. 1972 National Emissions Report, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency,
Research Triangle Park, N.C., EPA-450/2-74-012, June, 1974.
-------
TECHNICAL REPORT DATA
(Please read Instructions on the reverse before completing)
1. REPORT NO.
2.
4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE
IMPLEMENTATION PLAN REVIEW FOR FLORIDA - j
7. AUTHOR(S)
3. RECIPIENT'S ACCESSIOWNO.
5. REPORT DATE
AppRNmrFS
6. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE
8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NO.
9. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS
U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Off
Quality Planning and Standards, Research T
N.C.j Region IV Office, Atlanta, Ga. , and A
National Laboratory, Argonne, 111.
12. SPONSORING AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Air and Waste Management
Office of Air Quality Planning and Standar
Research Triangle Park, N.C. 27711
10. PROGRAM ELEMENT NO.
ice of Air
riangle Park 11-CONTRACT/GRANTN°-
rgonne
13. TYPE OF REPORT AND PERIOD COVERED
14. SPONSORING AGENCY CODE
ds
15. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES
16. ABSTRACT
Section IV of the Energy Supply and Environmental Coordination Act of 1974,
(ESECA) requires EPA to review each State Implementation Plan (SIP) to determine
if revisions can be made to control regulations for stationary fuel combustion
sources without interfering with the attainment and maintenance of the national
ambient air quality standards. This document contains the technical appendices
used in EPA's review.
17.
KEY WORDS AND DOCUMENT ANALYSIS
a. DESCRIPTORS
Air pollution
State Implementation Plans
18. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT
Release unlimited
b.lDENTIFIERS/OPEN ENDED TERMS
19. SECURITY CLASS (This Report)
Unclassified
20. SECURITY CLASS (This page)
Unclassified
c. COSATI Field/Group
21. NO. OF PAGES
22. PRICE
EPA Form 2220-1 (9-73)
------- |