March 1975
      IMPLEMENTATION PLAN REVIEW
                   FOR
           NORTH CAROLINA
                APPENDICES
      U. S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

-------
             APPENDIX A



State Implementation Plan Background

-------
            LEGEND
®  Places of 100.000 or more inhabitants
•   Places ol 50,000 to  100.000 inhabitants
Q  Central cities of SMSA's with (ewer than 50,000 inhabitants
O  Places of 25.000 to 50.000 inhabitants outside SMSA's
            Standard Metropolitan
             Statistical Areas (SMSA's)
TSP   DESIGNATION
                    O  10  IO  K> «0
                    ••?-.»•  t   IT"  1
                                  SO UlkCft
    Figure A-l.   Proposed North Carolina Air Quality  Maintenance Areas  (AC^lAs)

-------
                                                Table A-l.   North Carolina Air  Pollution Control Areas
Demographic Information
Air Quality
Control Region
Northern Piedmont
Eastern Mountain
Eastern Piedmont
Vetropolitan Charlotte
(South Carolina)
Northern Coastal Plain
S'.;; oil ills
Sruthern Coastal Plain
i\e5tem Mountain
Federal
Number
136
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
Population
1970
(Ml lions)
.98
.53
.92
1.06
.28
.58
.58
.34
Area
(Square
Miles)
5,440
5,836
8,116 .
5,962
6,193
6,942
7,701
4,899
Population
Per Square
Mile
181
91
114
178
45
84
76
69
Priority
Classification
Parti-
culates
I
I
I
I
I
II
II
I
S0x
III
III
III
II
III
III
III
III
N0x
III
III
III
III
III
III
III
III
«
Proposed AQMA Designations
TSP Counties SOx Counties
(2) Guilford, Forsyth
(0)
CO)
'!) Mecklenburg
(0)
(0)
(0)
(0)
(0)
(0)
(0)
(0)
(0)
(0)
(0)
(0)
3As of January 21,  1975.

-------
                            Table A-2.  North Carolina Ambient Air Quality Standards
                                    All concentrations :in ygm/nf

Federal

State

Primary
Secondary

Total Suspended
Annual
75(G)
60 (G)
60 (G)
Part icul ate
24 -I lour
260a
150a
150a
Sulfur Oxides
Annual 24 - Hour 3 - Hour
80 (A) 365a
— —
60(A)b 260a>b
—
1300a
1300a
Nitrogen
Annual
100 (A)
100 (A)
100 (A)
Dioxide
24 -Hour
—
—
250a
     to be exceeded more than once per year.
bKas adopted based on original EPA policy which was rescinded July, 1973.

(A)  Arithmetic rean
(G)  Geometric mean

-------
                                               Table A-3.   North Carolina AQCR /Vir Quality Status, TSP
                              TSP Concentration (ugm/m )
Number of Stations Exceeding
Ambient Air Quality Standards
No. Stations
AOCR Reporting
No. 24-Hr Annual
136 29 1
165 27 0
166 18 1
167b 47 6
168 12 0
169 9 0
170 14 0
171 24 0
Highest Reading
Annual 24 -Hr
84 335
527
82 315
63 646
321
264
754
884
a!973 air quality data in National Air Data
Interstate.
Violations based on 2nd
Formula: r-
., . f fand. High


highest reading at

2nd Highest Reading

24-Hr
258
330
303
645
229
250
395
738
Bank as of June 7, 1974

any station.

est 24-Hr - 24-Hr Secondary Standard^ „ nnn
2nd Highest 24-Hr -
Background J ~ — ,
\ Reduction Required Controlling
Primary Secondary to Meet Standards Standard
Annual 24-HrC Annual 24-Hrc
1018 +
1 - 5 +
1116 •»•
0118
- 0 - 1 +
- 0 - 1 +
1 - 3 +
- 4 - 9 +




(Annual - Annual Secondary Standard j , nn
V Annual - Background J u

47 24-Hr
60 24-Hr
56 24 -Hr
80 24-Hr
40 24 -Hr
45 24-Hr
67 24-Hr
83 24 -Hr





               North Carolina particulate background concentration:  30

Note that this is a first approximation.  EPA no longer encourages the use of rollback calculations to demonstrate NAAQS attainment.
However, in the absence of dispersion modeling calculations it is the only measure available and it is used here.

-------
                                               Table A-4.  North Carolina A()CR Air Quality Status, S02a
, Number of Stations Exceeding % Reduction Required Controlling
SO., Concentration (ygm/m ) Ambient Air Quality Standards to Meet Standards Standard
No. Stations Reporting
AQCR
No. Annual 24-Hr Cont.
136 1
165 0
166 1
167b 3
168 1
169 0
170 0
171 0
26 0
20 0
18 0
35 2
13 0
8 0
13 0
14 0
Highest Reading 2nd Highest Reading Primary Secondary
Annual 24 -Hr 24 -Hr Annual 24-Hrc
17 82 59 00
- 47 40 _ o
17 110 . . . 81 0 0
13 323 121 0 0
7 14 10 00
124 S3 0
- 65 64 _ 0
- 35 19 0
3-IIrc
— - 371 Annual
- 813 24 -Hr
- 351 24-Hr
- 202 24-Hr
- - 1,042 Annual
- 589 24 -Hr
- 470 24-Hr
- 1,821 24 -Hr
a!973 air quality data in National Aerometric Data Bank as of June 7, 1974.
blnterstate.



''Violations based on 2nd highest reading at any station.
hormula:
Maximum of
(2nd Highest 24-Hr -
V 2nd Highest
24 -Hr Standard] ... (^^1 vmual Standard^

" ' "r ' V Annual >/ x IUU

Note that this is a first approximation.  EPA no longer encourages the use of rollback calculations to demonstrate NAAQS attainment.
However, in the absence of dispersion modeling calculations it is the only measure available and it is used here.

-------
                              Table A-5.   North Carolina  Fuel Combustion Source Summary
AQCR
No.
136
165
166
16 7e
168
169
170
171
Total
Power Other Fuel Combustion
Plantsa ' Point Sources*3
2
2
3
3
0
1
2
1
14
14
4
1
1
2
14
6
5
47
Area
Sources0
11
15
16
8
15
11
13
11
100
Total Emissions
(103 tons/yr)d
TSP S02
49
31
147
120
36
37
94
27
541
31
88
118
144
31
12
67
47
538
1 Emissions from North Carolina
Fuel Combustion Sources
TSP S07
£
31
61
40
68
28
19
24
67
43
94
99
97
85
48
92
82
94
89
       Carolina plants
 North Carolina plants contributing 90% of the particulate  and SCu  emissions or  1,000 or more tons per year.
Storth Carolina counties
dAQCR total
 Interstate

-------
                                               Table A-6.   North Carolina Emissions Summary, TSP
AQCR
136
165
166
167 North Carolina
Other
Total
168
169
170
171
Total
, Total
(10 tons/yr)
49
31
147
108
12
120
3&
57
94
27
541
%
9
6
27
20
2
22
7
7
17
5
100
Electricity Generation
(103 tons/yr) S
1
8
49
68
0
68
<1
2
14
2
144
2
26
34
63
0
57
<1
5
15
6
27
Industrial/Commercial/
Institutional Point Source
(103 tons/yr) \
2
4
3
4
3
7
8
1
6
13
44
4
11
2
4
25
6
22
4
6
49
8
-Area Source
(10-5 tons/yr)
12
7
7
9
2
11
2
4
3
3
49
*
24
22
5
8
21
10
5
10
3
11
9
aEmission data from Reference 6.

-------
                                               Table A-7.   North Carolina Emissions Summary,  SO,*
AQCR
136
165
166
167 North Carolina
Other
Total
168
169
170
171
Total
, Total
(10 tons/yr)
31
88
118
128
16
144
31
12
67
47
538
I
6
16
22
24
3
27
6
2
12
9
100
P.1 eetricity Generation
(103 tons/yr) %
16
78
90
113
0
113
<1
4
30
13
345
52
89
76
88
0
79
<1
34
45
27 '
64
Indus trial /Commercial/
Institutional Point Source
(103 tons/yr) %
5
4
19
4
11
15
14
4
23
29
113
16
4
16
3
67
11
44
32
34
63
21
, Area Source
(10 tons/yr)
8
5
5
6
3
9
1
3
2
2
35
*
24
5
5
S
19
6
4
21
4
5
7
aEmission data from Reference 6.

-------
                          Table A-8.   North Carolina AQCR Required Emission Reduction0
AQCR
136
165
166
167b
168
169
170
171
Estimated Particulate Emission E
1 106
+ 47
+ 60
+ 56
+ 80
+ 40
+ 45
+ 67
+ 83
eduction Required
tons/year
+ 23
+ 19
+ 82
+ 96
+ 14
+ 17
+ 63
+ 22
Estimated S09
% L
- 371C
- 813C
- 351C
- 202
- 1,042C
- 58 9C
- 470°
- 1,821C
Emission Reduction Required
103 tons/year
- 115
- 715
- 414
- 291
- 323
- 71
- 315
- 856
       on a proportional change of emissions to air quality.  Note that this is a first approximation.  EPA no
 longer encourages the use of rollback calculations to demonstrate NAAQS attainment.  However, in the absence
 of dispersion modeling results, it is the only measure available and it is used here.

 Interstate.

''Exceptionally large negative numbers indicate current air quality is very good.  In this range, the proportional
 calculations do not give a good picture of allowable emission increases.  They are included here only as general
 indicators.

-------
                         Table  A-9. North Carolina Fuel Combustion Emission Regulations
                                Existing
                                                                        Newe
Visible1
No emission shall be darker than Ringelmann #2'
or equivalent spacity for more than 5 min. in
any one hour or for more than 20 min. in any
24-hour period.
On July 1, 1976, the standard for new sources
shall apply.
                                      No  emission shall  be darker  than  Ringelmann #
                                      or  equivalent opacity  for more  than  5 min.  in
                                      any one  hour or for more than 20  min. in any
                                      24-hour  period.
Particulate
Matter0
Up to and
including
 Heat Input
 (106 Btu/hr)


      10
     100
   1,000
> 10,000
 Maximum Allowable
   Emission of
Particulate Matter
 (lb-hr/106 Btu)


      0.60
      0.33
      0.18
      0.10
                                                             Same as existing units,
             Between the values listed see Figure A-l,
   SO-
2.3 Ib S02/106 Btu input per hour6
Existing sources must meet the new source
standard by July 1, 1980 unless a source
demonstrates that ambient air quality stan-
dards in its vicinity will not be contravened.
                                                               1.6 Ib S02/10  Btu input per hour
Constructed after July 1, 1975.
 Exceptions exist during startups ur-ing  approved procedures or where uncombined water vapor  is  the only reason
 for failure to comply.
Supplies to fuels such as coal, coke, lignite and  fuel oil, but not wood or refuse.  Separate emission limits
 apply for wood and refuse.
 iota! heat input of all fuel burning units  in  a plant is used to determine maximum allowable emission.

eLower limit could apply if violations of ambient  air quality standards due to a  specific source were demonstrated.

-------
                 1  I  I  I I 11
 GO
to
 O
      1.0
                                                                                                  Tin
 CO
 CO
LU

m  O.I

o


-------
          APPENDIX B



Regional Air Quality Assessment

-------
                                Table B-l.   North Carolina AQCR Candidacy Assessment  for Particulatc  Regulation Relaxation
Air Quality
Control Region
Northern Piedmont
Eastern Mountain
Eastern Piedmont
Metropolitan
Charlotte0
Northern Coastal
Plain
Sandhills
Southern Coastal
Plain
Western Mountain
Federal
Number
136
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
Stations
with
Particulate
Air Quality
Violations3
8
5b
6
9
lb
lb
3b
9b
Expected
Attainment
Date
7/75
7/75
7/7S
7/75
7/75
7/75
7/75
7/75
Number of
Counties vtith
Proposed AQMA.
Designations
2
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
Total Particulate
Emissions
CIO3 tons/yr)
49
31
147
120
36
37
94
27
% Emissions
from North Carolina
Fuel Combustion
31
61
40
68
28
19
24
67
Estimated
Emission Reduction
Required for
NAAQS
(103 tons/yr)
f 23
+ 19
+ 82
+ 96
+ 14
+ 17
+ 63
+ 22
Particulate
Priority
I
I
I
I
I
II
II
I
       number of stations given on Table A-3.



 NO annual data.



clnterstate.

-------
                                   Table B-2.  North Carolina AQCR Candidacy Assessment for SO, Regulation Relaxation



Air Quality
Control Region
Northern Piedmont
Eastern Mountain
Eastern Piedmont
Metropolitan
Charlotte^
Northern Coastal
Plain
Sandhills
Southern Coastal
Plain
Western Mountain



Federal
Number
136
J*£
166
167

168
169

170
171

Stations
with SO^
Air Quality
Violationsa
0
Ob
0
0

0
ob
K
0D
ob


Ejected
Attainment
Date
c
c
c
c

c
c

c
c

Number of
Counties with
Proposed AQM4
Designat ions
0
0
0
0

0
0

0
0


Total S02
Emissions
(103 tons/yr)
31
88
118
144

31
12

67
47


\ Emissions
from North Carolina
Fuel Combustion
94
99
97
85

48
92

82
94
Estimated
Emission Reduction
Required for
NAAQS
(103 tons/yr)
- 115
- 715
- 414
- 291

- 323
- 71

- 315
- 856



S02.
Priority
III
III
III
II

III
III

III
III
       number of stations given on Table A-4.
Tto annual data.
Presently meeting standards.
 Interstate.

-------
      APPENDIX C



Power Plant Assessment

-------
                    Table C-l.  North  Carolina Power Plant Assessment
AQCR
136

165

166


167S


168
169

170




171


Dan River
Belews Creek 1 and 2
Cliffs ide
Marshall
Cape Fear
Roxboro6
Chapel Hill£
Allen
Buck
Ri verb end
No Power Plants
W. H. Weatherspoon

H. F, Lee


L. V. Sutton

Ashville

1975
Capacity
(14*)
166
2160
781
2000
421
1788
12.5
1155
440
631

166

402


672

414

Estimated 1975
Fuel Use
Fuel
Coal
Coal
Coal
Coal
Oil
Coal
Oil
Coal
Oil
Coal
Gas
Coal
Coal
Coal

Coal
Oil
Gas
Coal
Oil
Gas
Coal
Oil
Gas
Coal
Oil
Quantity3
868
4,257
1,498
5,106
5,062
816
293
4,249
918
40
449
3,268
1,187
1,392

204
339
4,295
855
473
1,095
357
1,530
3,977
854
507
1 S Under SIP 1 S Allowed by
Regulations13 Modelc
<1
1-2
1-2
<1
<1
1-2
<1
1-2
<1
1-2
1-2
<1
1-2

1-2
<1

1-2
<1
-
1-2
1-2
1-2
<1
 Coal quantity in 10  tons/yr;  oil quantity in 10  gal/yr;  gas quantity in 106 ft3yr.
 Estimates based on 1971 fuel use patterns  plus planned additions.

 The maximum allowable % S is assumed to be the 1971  %  S unless the regulations require
 a lower IS.  Oil % S is assumed to remain at 1971 levels.

 NO modeling results were available for power plants  in North Carolina.
^ew plants in 1974 and 1975

 New unit in 1973.

 Includes some fuel used for steam heating  and/or process steam.

 Interstate.

-------
                         Table C-2. North Carolina Power Plant Evaluation Summary
\
\
AQCR Fuel i < 1%
136 coal | 868
165 coal ! 5106
oil , 5062
166 coal 1
oil 1211
gas 449
167b coal 1187
1975 Fuel Required
by SIP Regulationsa
1-2% 2-31 > 3%
4257
1498
5105
4660
168 No plants
169 coal
oil 339
gas 4295
170 coal
oil 473
gas 5072
171 coal
oil 507
North Carolina Total
coal 7161
oil 7592
gas 9816
204
1212
1530
854
17790
1530
1975 Fuel Required by
Modified Regulations
< 1% 1-2% 2-3% > 3%
No modeling results available.
No modeling results available.
No modeling results available.
No modeling results available.

No modeling results available.
No modeling results available.
No modeling results available.
No modeling results available
for North Carolina power plants.
     requirements based  on  1971  fuel use patterns at  1975 consumption rates plus any new units.  Maximum % S
is 1971 % S unless regulations require a lower % S.   Oil % S is assumed to remain at 1971 levels.  Coal  in
103 tons/yr; oil in 103  gal/yr;  gas in 106 ft3/yr.

Interstate.

-------
                          APPENDIX D



Industrial,  Commercial,  Institutional Point Source Assessment

-------
Table D-l.   North Carolina Industrial/Commercial/Institutional Source Assessment
AQCR Planta
136 Cone Mills -Granite
Finish Box
Burl Craft
Mayfair Textile Coal
La Fry Roofing Company
Burlington Industries, Inc. -
Denton
Burlington Industries, Inc.
Joseph Schlitz Company
Cone Mills -White Oak Plant
North Carolina A $ T
State University
Randolph Mills
Lucks
Renfro Hosiery Mills
Chatam Manufacturing Company
Burnsville Mill
165 Old Fort Finishing
American Thread Company
Marion Manufacturing
Appalachian State University
Fuel
Coal
Oil
Gas
Oil
Oil
Gas
Oil
Oil
Oil
Gas
Oil
Gas
Coal
Gas
Coal
Oil
Coal
Oil
Oil
Coal
Oil
Oil
Coal
Oil
Oil
Coal
Coal
Estimated
Fuel •,
Consumption
4
1,500
491
600
1,565
440
1,200
775
1,392
387
1,565
220
26
1,055
8.2
1,719
6
600
1,050
34
189
466
30
50
1,020
3.5
10.5
SIP
Regulations
1 SC
>3
2-3
2-3
>3
2-3
2-3
>3
>3
>3
>3
1-2
1-2
2-3
2-3
1-2
<1
2-3
1-2
<1
2-3
1-2
1-2

-------
Table D-l.  North Carolina Industrial/Commercial/Institutional Source Assessment  (Contd.)
                                                       Estimated
                                                          Fuel
                              SIP
                         Regulations
AQCR
166
167d
168

169















170

Plant
Ablemark Paper Company
Kerr Bleach
Texas Gulf Sulphur Company
Weyerhauser Company
Harris Mining Company
DuPont
Alamac Knit
Burlington Industries, Inc.
Fayetteville
Rohm-Haas Company
Texfi Lively Knits
Burlington Industries, Inc. -
Erwin Plant
Texfi Counter Knit
J. P. Stevens
Textured Fabrics, Inc.
Texfi - Lumber ton

Beaunit Corporation
Johns -Manville Products
Corporation
Spring Mills
Georgia-Pacific Corporation
Federal Paperboard
Fuel
Coal
Oil
Coal
Oil
Oil
Coal
Oil
Oil
Oil
D-Oil
R-Oil
Oil
Gas
Oil
Oil
Coal
Oil
Oil
Gas
Oil
Oil
Gas
Coal
Oil
Oil
Gas
Consumption
4.5
18,832
24
9,190
59,600
7.0
1,440
1,300
1,620
600
4,500
680
1
5,340
420
8.0
330
360
67
1,400
400
1
24
2,570
36,200
1,302
% SC
>3
1-2
1-2
2-3
2-3
1-2
2-3
2-3
2-3
<1
2-3
2-3
2-3
2-3
1-2
2-3
>3

2-3
2-3

1-2
2-3
2-3
             Weyerhauser Company
Oil
22,700
2-3

-------
Table D-l.  North Carolina Industrial/Commercial/Institutional Source Assessment  (Contd.)
    AQCR
Plant
Fuel
 Estimated
    Fuel
Consumption
    SIP
Regulations
   \ Sc
170
(Contd.)

171




Caswell Center
Diamond Shamrock
Hercules, Inc.
American Enka Company6
f^
American Enka Company
Champion Papers
The Mead Corporation
The Olin Corporation
Coal
Oil
Oil
Gas
D-Oil
R-Oil
Gas
Coal
D-Oil
R-Oil
Gas
Coal
Oil
Coal
Oil
Coal
Gas
21
10,600
30,650
702
765
21,350
600
201
805
21,350
600
332
644
76
450
152
902
1-2
2-3
2-3
2-3
1-2
2-3
1-2
2-3
1-2
1-2
     itorth Carolina plants contributing 90% of the AQCR's S02 or particulates or
     emitting more than 1,000 tons/yr.

     Coal in 10  tons/yr; oil in 10  gal/yr; gas in 10  ft /yr.
    Q
     For dual coal-oil fired plants,  the % S in oil was assumed to remain at its
     present level.   For plants firing both distillate and residual oils, but no
     coal, the I S in the distillate  oil was assumed to remain constant.
    dT
     Interstate.

    60ne of two American Enka plants  in AQCR 171.

-------
      Table D-2.  North Carolina Industrial/Commercial/Institutional
                          Source Evaluation Summary
                                      Fuel Required by Existing Regulations'
AQCR
136
165
166
167b
168
169
170
171
North Carolina
Total
Fuel*
coal
oil
gas
coal
oil
coal
oil
coal
oil
coal
oil
gas
coal
oil
gas
coal
oil
gas
coal
oil
gas
< 1%
189
2,593
50



600
69
2,004
2,020
2,102
2,859
6,768
1-2% 2-3%
40
1,719 6,191
44
1,020
18,832
24
68,790
39
17,430
21
102,720
761
43,344
929
20,551 239,495
> 3%
38
4,522

4


360


42
4,882
 Includes fuel use for sources listed on Table D-l only.
Coal in 103 tons/yr; oil in 103 gal/yr;  gas in 103 ft3/yr.

 Interstate.

-------
    APPENDIX E



Area Source Assessment

-------
                             Table E-l.  North Carolina Area Source Fuel Use
                   Coal                Residual Oil            Distillate Oil           Natural  Gas
AQCR           (103 tons/yr)           (103 gals/yr)            (103 gals/yr)             (106 ft3/yr)
136
165
166
167a
168
169
170
171
Total
83
58
73
82
16
35
38
34
419
NA
3,720
NA
4,250
2,620
NA
3,700
3,140
17,430
119,240
97,580
95,860
138,210
46,250
61,030
87,420
66,350
711,940
28,990
14,050
20,760
36,620
4,320
11,080
10,910
6,490
133,220
 
-------
   APPENDIX F



Fuels Assessment

-------
                                                   Table F-l.   North Carolina Clean Fuels Analysis Summary
                         Existing Regulations Clean Fuel Requirements
  Minimum Clean Fuels Savings  .
Through Regulation Modification
AQCR
136
165
166
167C
168
169
170
171
North
Carolina
Total
Fuel
coal
oil
coal
oil
coal
oil
coal
coal
oil
coal
oil
coal
oil
coal
oil
coal
oil
" < n S
868
189
5,106
5,112
1,211
1,187
339
1,073
507
2,020
7,161
10,451
1 - 2% S 2 - 3% S 3% S
4,297 38
1,719 6,191 4,522
1,542
1,020
5,105 4
18,832
4,684
204
68,790
1,251
1,530 17,430 360
875
102,720
761
43,344
18,719 42
22,081 239,495 4,882
< 1% S 1 - 21 S 2 - 3% S 3% S
No modeling results available.
No modeling results available.
No modeling results available.
No modeling results available.
No power plants.
No modeling results available.
No modeling results available.
No modeling results available.
d
aFor power plants and industrial/commcrcial/institutional point sources.  Includes fuel use for i>owcr plants (Table C-l) and industrial/commercial/
 institutional point sources  (Table D-l) only.  Coal in 10^ tons/yr; oil ir 103 gals/yr.

 Based on modeling results for power plants only.

""Interstate
  lo modeling results were available for North Carolina power plants - Thus, no estimates of minimum clean fuels savings could be made.

-------
                                REFERENCES


1.  Modeling Analysis of Power Plants for Compliance Extensions in 51 Air
    Quality Control Regions, report prepared under Contract No. 68-02-0049
    for the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Walden Research Division
    of Abcor, Inc., Cambridge, Mass., December 17, 1973.

2.  Steam Electric Plant Factors,  1973,  National Coal Association, Washington,
    D. C., January 1974.

3.  Power plant data file,  unpublished,  U.  S. Environmental Protection Agency,
    Research Triangle Park, N. C.

4.  Power plant SCL emission estimates,  unpublished data, U. S. Environmental
    Protection Agency,  Research Triangle Park, N.  C.

5.  National Emissions Data Systems data bank, U.  S. Environmental Protection
    Agency, Research Triangle Park, N. C.

-------
                                    TECHNICAL REPORT DATA
                             (Please read /HUrncrinns on the m mr r».-tare completing)
 1. REPORT NO.
2.
                                                             3. RECIPIENT'S ACCESSION NO.
 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE
                                                             5. REPORT DATE
    IMPLEMENTATION PLAN REVIEW FOR NORTH CAROLINA
                                             APPENDICES
                              6. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE
 7. AUTHORio)
                                                             8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NO
 :>. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS
                                                             10. PROGRAM ELEMENT NO.
    U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office  of Air
    Quality  Planning and Standrds,  Research Triangle Park
    N.C., Region IV Office, Atlanta,  Ga., and Argonne
    National Laboratory, Argonne,  111.    	
                              11. CONTRACT/GRANT NO.
 12. SPONSORING AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS
    U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
    Office of Air and Waste Management
    Office of Air Quality Planning  and Standards
    Research Trinagle Park, N.C.  27711
                                                             13. TYPE OF REPORT AND PERIOD COVERED
                              14. SPONSORING AGENCY CODE
 15. SUPPLEME,-. TARY NOTES
 16. ABSTRACT

         Section IV of the Energy Supply and Environmental Coorination Act of 1974,
    (ESECA) requires EPA to review each State Implementation Plan  (SIP) to determine
    if revisions can be made to control regulations  for stationary fuel combustion
    sources without interfering with the attainment  and maintenance of the national
    ambient air  quality standards.   This doument contains the technical appendices
    used in EPA's review.
                                KEY WORDS AND DOCUMENT ANALYSIS
                  DESCRIPTORS
    Air pollution
    State  Implementation Plans
                tUDENTIFlERS'OPEN ENDED TERMS
                                                                          0.  COSATI lickl liroup
 3. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT
    Release unlimted
                19. SECURITY CLASS (This Report!

                   Unclassified
21. NO. OF PAGES
                                               20. SECURITY CLASS (This page I
                                                 Unclassified
                                            22. PRICE
EPA Form 2220-1 (9-73)

-------