March 1975
IMPLEMENTATION PLAN REVIEW
FOR
SOUTH CAROLINA
APPENDICES
U. S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
-------
APPENDIX A
State Implementation Plan Background
-------
Table i-l. South Carolina Air Pollution Control Areas
Demographic Information
Air Quality
Control Region
Augusta-Aiken (Ga.)
Savannah-Beaufort (Ga.)
Metropolitan Charlotte (N.C.)
Camden-Sumter
Charleston
Ccl'_';±>ia
Florence
Gre envi 1 le - Sp ar t anburg
Greenwood
Georgetown
Federal
Number
53
58
167
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
Population
1970
(Millions)
.52
.39
1.06
.16
.34
.37
.26
.66
.16
.14
Area Population
(Square Per Square
Miles) Mile
9,134 57'
6,335 62
5,962 178
2,461 64
2,618 129
2,796 1>:3
3,515 ?5
3,912 168
2,963 .14
2,901 48
Priority
Classification
Parti-
culates
I
I
I
II
I
II
III
I
III
II
sox
II
I
II
III
I.
Ill
III
III
III
III
NOX
III
III
III
III
III
Hi
III
III
III
III
Proposed ~
AQMA Designations
TSP Counties ^x Counties
(0)
(0)
(0)
(0)
(2) Charleston15, Berkley13
(0)
(0)
(1) Greenvilleb
(0)
(0)
(0)
(0)
(0)
(0)
(0)
(0)
(0)
(0)
(0)
CO)
a.
As of November 4, 1974.
b •
Only a portion of the county is in the proposed AQMA.
-------
TSP DESIGNATION
Note: Only portions of the
indicated counties are
included in the
proposed AQMAs.
CHARLESTON
LEGEND
® Places of 100,000 or more inhabitants
• Places of 50,000 to 100,000 inhabitants
O Places of 25,000 to 50,000 inhabitants outside SMSA's
ERIE
Standard Metropolitan
Statistical Areas (SMSA's)
Figure A.I. Proposed South Carolina Air Quality Maintenance Areas (AQMAs)
-------
Table A-2. South Carolina Ambient Air Quality Standards
All concentrations in ugm/nT
o
Federal
State
Primary
Secondary
Total Suspended
Annual
75 (G)
60 (G)
60 (G)
Particulate
24 -Hour
260a
150a
250
Sulfur Oxides
Annual '24-Hour 3-Hour
80 (A)
—
80 (A)
365a
1300a
365s 1300*
Nitrogen Dioxide
Annual
100 (A)
100 (A)
100 (A)
to be exceeded more than once per year.
(A) Arithmetic mean
(G) Geometric mean
-------
Table A-3. South Carolina AQCR Air Quality Status, TSP
TSP Concentration Qgm/m3)
Number of Stations Exceeding
Ambient Air Quality Standards
No. Stations Highest Reading
Arrr Recortin" — =- L
Xo. 24-Hr Annual Annual
53b 7
58b 15
167b 47
198 4
199 11
200 13
201 3
202 27
203 2
204 4
6 59
4 33
6 63
4 61
4 133
9 76
3 76
11 SO
1 51
3 , 91
24-Hr
181
364
646
332
986
650
239
575
145
287
a!973 air quality data in National Air Data
Interstate.
S'iolations based on
Formula:
2nd highest reading at
•- /
/ 2nd Highest
24-Hr -
2nd Highest Reading
24-Hr
148
283
645
137
486
170
237
522
120
259
Bank as of June 7, 1974
any station.
24-Hr Secondary Standard^
Primary
Annual
0
0
0
0
2
1
1
1
0
2
.
t
'
Secondary
24-HrC Annual
0
1
1
0
2
0
0
2
0
0
/Annual
0
0
1
1
2
4
3
3
0
L,
- Annual
24-Hrc
0
5
8
0
3
2
1
5
0
2
Secondary
; Reduction Required Controlling
to Meet Standards1^ Standard
- 2
+ 53
+79
+ 3
+72
+35
+42
+ 76
-33
+ 51
Standard)
24-Hr
24 -Hr
24-Hr
Annual
24-Hr
Annual
24-Hr
24-Hr
24-Hr
Annual
,^^u Oi L v 2nd Highest 24-Hr - Background J A ^' \ Annual - Background J A iuuj
South Carolina particulate background concentration:
AQCRs 53, 167, 199: 20.6 ygm/m3
AQCRs 58, 198, 200, 201, 2C2, 203, 204: 30 ygm/m3
Note that this is a first approximation. EPA no longer encourages the use of rollback calculations as a means of demonstrating NAAQS
attainment. However, in the absence of dispersion modeling results it is the only measure available and it is used here.
-------
Table A-4. South Carolina AQCR Mr Quality Status, S02
SO-, Concentration Qgm/m3)
Number of Stations Exceeding
Ambisnt Air Qua/ity Standards
Xo. Stations
A0cri Reporting
Highest Reading 2nd Highest Reading
No. Annual 24-Hr Cont. Annual 24-Hr
53b 6 6 1 19 307
58b 2 10 2 4 439
167b 3 35 2
13 323
198 2 21 7 57
199 2 83 5 146
200 6 8 1 ' 9 171
201 111 3 26
202 7 19 1 18 90
203 1 20 6 49
204 2 20 6 125
a!973 air quality data in National Aerometric
Interstate.
24-Hr
94
67
121
34
59
52
.7
88
35
;34
Data Bank as of June 7,
/
Primary *''
. Annual 24-Hr C
0
0
0
0
0 .
0
0
0
0
0
1974.
q
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 '
0
0
/•
Secon.iary
3-Hrc
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-
-
% Reduction Required
to Meet Standards^
- 288
- 445
- 202
- 974
- 519
- 602
-2,567
- 315
- 945
- 974
Controlling
Standard
24-Hr
24-Hr
24-Hr
24 -Hr
24-Hr
24-Hr
Annual
24-Hr
24-Hr
24-Hr
'"Violations based on 2nd highest reading at any station.
Formula:
Maximum of
/2nd Highest 24-Hr -
\ 2nd Highest
24-Hr Standard^
24-Hr ) x100'
(
/;
Annual
V
- Annual StandardX
Annual J
x 100
Note that this is a first approximation. EPA no longer encourages the use of rollback calculations as a means of demonstrating NAAQS
attainment. However, in the absence of dispersion modeling results it is the only measure available and it is used here.
-------
Table A-5. South Carolina Fuji Combustion Source Summary
Total Itaissions
Bnissions from Sauth Carolina
AQCR Power Other Fuel Combustion Area .
No. Plantsa Point Sources Sources1"
53s
58e
167e
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
Total
aSouth Carolina
°South Carolina
cSouth Carolina
d.AQCR total.
1
1
0
0
3
3
1
1
1
1
12
plants .
plants contributing
counties .
2
0
7
5
2
0
2
10
6
2
36
901 of
6
4
4
4
3
4
6
6
6
3
46
the particulate and SCu emissions
(10-^ tons/year)
TSP SO.,
43
68.
120
6
51
24
50
28
6
12
408
or 1,000
43
53
144
10
41
58
15
39
6
39
448
or more tons per year.
Fuel Combustion Sources
TSP SO,
23
7
5
33
18
46
12
50 '..
33
25
17
60
32
10
80
90
97
80
85
83
85
54
'Interstate •
-------
Table A-6. South Carolina Bnissions Sunmary, TSPC
AQCR
53 South Carolina
Other
Total
58 South Carolina
Other
Total
167 South Carolina
Other
Total
198
199
200
201
202
203
204 '
Total
Total
(10 3 tons/yr)
24
19
43
7
61
68
12
108
120
6
51
24
50
28
6
12
408
1
6
5
11
2
15
17
3
27
30
1
12
6
12
7
1
3
100
Electricity Generation
CIO3 tons/yr) I
<1
0
<1
4
<1
4
0
68
68
< 1
4
9
3
5
< 1
1
94
1
0
1
57
< 1
6
0
63
57
1
7
37
6
18
1
10
23
Industrial/Commercial/
Institutional Point Source
CIO3 tons/yr) \
8
3
11
< 1
7
7
3
4
7
1
3
< 1
1
2
< 1
1
33
32
15
24
< 1
12
11
25
4
6
22
6
< 1
1
6
5
8
8
Area Source
CIO3 tons/yr)
2
1
3
1
1
2
3
9
12
1
2
2
2
7
2
1
34
%
8
7
7
9
2
2
21
8
10
21
3
10
5
26
32
7
8
aEmission data from reference 5.
-------
Table A-7, South Carolina Emissions Summary,SO a
AQCR
53 South Carolina
Other
Total
58 South Carolina
Other
Total
167 South Carolina
Other
Total
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
Total
Electricity Generation
(103 tons/yr) %
31
12
43
18
35
53
16
128
144
10
41
58
15
39
6
39
7
3
10
4
8
12
4
28
32
2
9
13
3
9
1
9
(10 tons/yr)
10
0
10
16
6
22
0
113
113
1
21
50
7
15
<1
21
%
33
0
24
89
16
41
0
88
79
14
50
85
46
39
2
54
Indus trial /Commercial
Institutional Point Source
(1C3 tons/yr)
14
6
20
<:L
15
15
11
4
15
5
13
1
2
6
3
11
%
45
53
47
1
43
29
67
3
11
55
30
1
14
15
50
29
Area Source
(10 tons/yr)
2
2
4
1
1
2
3
6
9
2
3
5
3
12
2
1
%
6
15
8
6
4
5
19
5
6
17
7
9
22.
31
30
3
TOTAL
448
100
260
58
91
20
43
10
Emission data from reference 5.
-------
a
Table A-8. South Carolina Required Emission Reduction
AQCR Estimated Part-'culate Emission Reduction Required Estimated SO, Emission Reduction Required
%
53b -2
58b +53
16 7b +79
198 +3
199 +72
200 +35
201 +42
202 +76
203 -33
204 +51
10 tons/year
-1
+36
+95
<+l
+37
+8
+21
+21
-2
+6
%
-288
-445°
. . -202
-974°
-519C
-602C
-2567°
-315C
-943C
-974°
10 tons/year
-124
-236
-291
-97
-21 ?
-349
-385
-123
-57
-380
Based on a proportional change of emissions to air quality. Note that this is a first approximation. EPA no
longer encourages the use of rollback calculations to demonstrate NAAQS attainment. However, in the absence of
dispersion modeling results it is the only measure available, and it is used here.
b •-• - ' :
Interstate
Exceptionally large negative numbers indicate current quality is very good. In this range, the proportional
calculations do not give a good picture of allowable emission increases. They are included here only as general
indicators.
-------
Table A-9. South Carolina Fuel Combustion Emission Regulations
Particulates
Category:
Heat Input:
Emission Limit:
Fuel burning operations in use or under construction before February 11, 197] and fuel burning operations
constructed on or after February 11, 1971 shall use the appropriate portion of the graph on Fig. 2-1.
Class I Counties
< 10 x 106 Btu/hr > 10 x 106 Btu/hr
3.5 lbs/106 Btu 2.3 lbs/106 Btu
Class II
< 1000 x 106 Btu/hr
3.5 lbs/106 Btu
Counties
> 1000 x 106 Btu/hr
2.3 lbs/106 Btu
Class III Counties
All Sources
3.5 lbs/106 Btu
Effective after Jan. 30, 1974 Class I Counties - Charleston
S07 Class II Counties - Ar'.ken, Anderson
Class III Counties - All others
This classification is subject to periodic review and revision.
Exceptions:
1) If it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the S.C. Borad of Health and Environmental Control that ambient air standards
will not be contravened by a source, alone or in combination with other sources, a greater allowance for SO, discharges will be
made on a case by case basis in accordance with usual variance procedures.
2) Residences or dwellings of four families or less are exempt.
-------
PARTICULATfL EMISSION, FUEL BURNING OPERATIONS
APPROXIMATE STEAM ITERATION, THOUSANDS OF POUNDS PER HOUR
5 10 50 100 MX)
=3
I-
m
z
o
CT
UJ
Q_
o
Q.
CO
in
ID
Q
1 D
1 0
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
I
PRIOR
: ;
1
1 ; ,
1 • r
1 4 - --
TO FTP lt( 1971 JT
._ ___. j
1
\
\
ON OR AFTER FEB II, 1971 -^
i
i
j
.
5
? ir% cf
1 1 0 0 H *
q.fo'pf
d nrirtc
i i
BASIS
"Qill fiol
h e o ' i n p u
< i g '' i . s p
piqh t
fiQlly no t
i 1 i i
1 Up S(,V.I j
lys-col |
Tvc/ons j
. . . J
i i I
'
' j
\ \
\
I
^
STACK HEIGHT/
(FTI '
above qiait
i i i
V— '
V
\
i \
r
j
i
^ "\ 60?
\ \
\ 300\
\ \
225\ \
K \ %>
%- i j
. _.. __.,
i \ \
\ \
V %J
. .
^
\
\
i ^
\
\
*
»
i "*
\
\
\
i i i i
1 S
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
J
2
1
5 10 50 100 500 1000 5000 10,000
TOTAL EQUIPMENT CAPACITY RATING
MILLION BTU PER HOUR INPUT
H.g. A-2. South Carolina Particulate Emission Regulations
-------
APPENDIX B
Regional Air Quality Assessment
-------
Table B-l. South Carolina AQCR Candidacy Assessment for Particulate Regulation Relaxation
AQCR
Augusca-
Aikend 53
Savannah-
Beaufort 58
Metropolitan
Charlotted 167
Caraden-
Sumter 198
Charleston 199
Columbia 200
Florence 201
Greenville-
Spartanburg 202
Greenwood 203
Georgetown 204
Stations
with Particulate
Air Quality
Violations
0
5
9
1
3
4
3
7
0
2
Expected
Attainment
Date
b
7/75
7/75
7/75
7/75
7/75
c
7/75
.b
7/75
Number of
Counties with
Proposed Particulate
AQMA Designations
0
0
0
0
2e
0
0
le
0
0
Total Particulate
Emissions
(103 tons/yr)
43
68
120
6
51
24
50
28
6
12
^Emissions
from So. Carolina
Fuel Combustion
23
7
5
33
18
46
12
50
33
25
Estimated
Emission Reduction
Required for NAAQS
(103 tons/yr)
-1
+36
+95
<+l
+37
+8
+21
+21
-2
+6
Particulate
Priority
I
I
I
II
I
II
III
I
III
II
Total number of stations given on Table A-3.
Presently meeting standards.
CAttainment schedule indicates region is below standards; current data indicates violations.
.Interstate
Only a portion of each of the counties is in the proposed AQ14A..
-------
Table B-2. South Carolina AQCR Candidacy Assessment for SO Regulation Relaxation
AQCR
Augus ta-
AikenC 53
Savsnnah-
3eaufortC 58
Metropolitan
Charlotte0 167
Car.d=n-
Sur.ter 198
Charleston 199
Columbia 200
Florence 201
Greenville-
Spar tanburg 202
Greenwood 203
Georgetown 204
Stations with Expected
SO, Air Quality Attainment
' Violations Date
0 b
0 b
0 b
0 b
0 b
0 b
0 b
0 b
0 b
0 b
Number of
Counties Wj.Ji
Proposed
S02 AQMA.
Designations
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Total S02
Emissions
(103 tons/yr)
A3
53
144
10
41
58
15
39
6
39
Emissions
from So. Carolina Fuel
Combustion
60
32
10
80
90
97
80
85
83
85
Estimated
Emission Reduction
Required for NAAQS
(103 tons/yr)
-124
-236
-291
-9?'
-213
-349
-385
-123
-57
-380
S02
Priority
II
I
II
. Ill
I
III
III
III
III
III
"Total number of stations given on Table A-4.
Presently meeting standards.
"Interstate.
-------
APPENDIX C
Power Plant Assessment
-------
Table C-l. South Carolina Power Plant Assessment
AQCR
53
58
167
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
Plant
Urquhart
Canadys
None
None
Hagood
Jeffries
Williams0
McMeekin
Pan
Wateree
Robinson
Lee
Tiger
Greenwood
Grainger
Georgetown
1975
Capacity
IMIV)
250.0
489.6
97.8
445.6
550.0
293.8
72.5
771.8
206.6
345.0
30.0
36.1
163.2
315.0
Estimated 1975
Fuel Use
Fuel
Coal
Oil
Gas
Coal
Oil
Gas
Oil
Gas
Coal
Oil
Gas
Oil
Coal
Oil
Gas
Coal
Oil
Coal
Oil
Coal
Oil
Coal
Gas
Coal
Coal
Oil
Gas
Coal
Coal
a
Quantity
314
78
9,065
684
549
6,231
6,758
4,485
644
22,814
225,866
326
165
5,215
82
134
771
1,337
313
1,517
922
4,600
21
44
3,439
1,349
404
549
1971
IS
Used
1.8
0.1
1.2
0.1
2.7
1.1
1.9
NA
1.6
0.1
1.2
0.1
1.5
0.1
1.0
0.1
1.1
1.0
1.0
0.3
1.0
NA
IS
Under SIP
Regulations
1.5
2.2
2.2
3.3
2.2
2.2
2.1
2.2
7.2
3.3
T O
s'.s
2.2
3.3
2.2
3.3
1.5
2.2
2.2
3.3
2.2
2.2
IS
Allowed bv
Modeling^
1.6
2.3
3.3
4.8
5.8
2.9
4.2
>9.0
2.2
3.3
NA
NA
>6.0
>9.0
>6.0
>9.0
1.5
NA
NA
NA
>6.0
NA
aCoal quantity is 10 tons/yr, oil quantity is 10 gals/yr, gas quantity is 10
Vyr.
Estimates are based on 1971 fuel use patterns plus planned additions.
bThe maximum allowable IS is estimated based on 12,200 Btu/lb for coal and 146,300 Btu/gal
for oil. Modeling results are from the revised s.C. SIP. N.B. With the exception of the
Urquhart and Hagood plants, the fuel used at all plants in 1971 was below SIP requirements.
Stew plant in 1973.
plant in 1974.
-------
Table C-2. South Carolina Power Plant Evaluation Summary
55
58
167
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
State
AQCR
Coal
Oil
Coal
Oil
Coal
Oil
Coal
Oil
Coal
Oil
Coal
Oil
Coal
Oil
Coal
Oil
Coal
Oil
Fuel Sulfur Content Required by
Existing Regulationsa
< 1% 1-2% 2-5% > 5%
314
78
684
549
No Power Plants
No Power Plants
644
255,458
1,179
1,636
315
1,517
922
21. . .:: :
448
5,459
549
1,256 5,817
255,516 7,141
Fuel Sulfur Content Required by
Modeling Results"
< 1% '1-2% 2-5% > 5%
514
78
684
549
644
255,458
408 771
1,656
513
1,517
922
44 404
MA
1,256 1,096 2,172
259,140
Fuel requirements based on 1971 fuel use pattern
oil quantity is 10* gals/yr.
and added capacity. Coal quantity is 10 tons/yr,
^laximum allowable % S determined from power plant modeling data in the S.C. SIP. N.B. With the
exception of 2 plants, all facilities had fuel available in 1971 which was well below current
SIP requirements.
-------
APPENDIX D
Industrial, Commercial, Institutional Point Source Assessment
-------
Table D-l. South Carolina Industrial/Commercial/Institutional Source Assessment
AQCR
53d
58d
167d
198
Plant3
Graniteville Co.
AEC- Savannah
River Plant
No plants
Spring Mills -
Groce Finishing
Cone Mills Corp.
Excelsior Mill
Bowaters Carolina Corp.
Rock Hill Printing §
Finishing Co.
Rock Hill Print jng §
Finishing Co.
Celanese Fiber
Kendall-Bethune Plant
DuPont - May Plant
Reeves Brothers
Santee Printworks
Campbell Soup Co.
Fuel
Coal
Oil
Gas
Coal
Oil
Coal
Gas
Coal
Gas
Oil
Gas
Oil
Gas
Coal
Oil
Gas
Coal
Oil
Gas
Coal
Gas
Coal
Oil
Gas
Coal
Oil
Gas
Coal
Gas
Oil
Gas
Oil
Gas
Estimated
Fuel ,
Consumption
14
2,434
1,255
663
343
70
1,450
24
426
1,460
222
16,000
1,350
38
1,206
82
15
12,718
836
193
3,332
4
1,560
319
171
610
560
9
303
2,250
352
1,380
245
SIP
Regulations
%SC
2-3
>3
2-3
>3
2-3
2-3
>3
>3
2-3
>3
2-3
>3
2-3
2-3
>3
2-3
>3
2-3
>3
>3
-------
Table D-l. South Carolina Industrial/Commercial/Institutional Source Assessment (Contd.)
AQCR
199
200
201
202
Planta
Humble Oil Refining Co.
Westvaco Craft Div.
No plants
S. C. Industries
J. P. Stevens
Excelsior Finishing
Plant
Magnolia Finishing
Plant
Cone Mills
Carotell Paperboard Co.
Clemson University
Sylvan Chemical Co.
Hoechst Fibers, Inc.
Lyman Printing §
Finishing Co.
Fairforest Fining
Pacolet Mills
Fuel
Oil
Oil
Gas
Oil
Gas
Coal
Oil
Gas
Oil
Gas
Oil
Gas
Oil
Gas
Coal
Gas
Coal
Gas
Oil
Gas
Oil
Gas
Oil
Gas
Oil
Gas
Oil
Estimated
Fuel ,
Consumption
3,413
56,700
480
3,900
876
22
1,658
966
707
360
4,000
652
4,000
372
15
188
12
104
1,050
149
8,990
1,541
1,556
1,500
2,000
422
896
SIP
Regulations
ISC
2-3
2-3
>3
2-3
>3
>3
>3
>3
2-3
2-3
>3
>3
>3
>3
>3
-------
Table D-l. South Carolina Industrial/Canmercial/Institutional Source Assessment (Contd.)
AQCR
203
204
Planta
Klompan Mills
Abbeville Mills
Greenwood Mills -
Matthews Plant #1
Greenwood Mills -
Matthews Plant #2
Greenwood Mills -
Matthews Plant #3
McComick Mill
International Paper
Georgetown Steel
Fuel
Oil
Gas
Coal
Gas
Oil
Gas
Oil
Gas
Oil
Gas
Oil
Oil
Oil
Estimated
Fuel ,
Consunption
2,920
991
4
211
5,060
786
5,060
786
5,060
786
2,154
60,910
5,250
SIP
Regulations
ISC
>3
2-3
>3
>3
>3
>3
>3
>3
aSouth Carolina plants contributing 901 of the AQCR's S02 or particulates or
emitting 1,000 or more tons/yr.
bCoal in 103 tons/yr; oil in 103 gal/yr; gas in 106 ft3/yr.
cAssuming state-wide average heating values for fuels.
Interstate.
eOne of two Rock Hill plants in the region.
-------
Table D-2. South Carolina Industrial/Commercial/Institutional Source Evaluation Sumiary
Fuel
Required by Existing Regulationsa
AQCR Fuel <1%S 1-2%S 2-3%S >5%S
53C Coal
Oil
Gas 1,255
677
2,777
58C No plants
167C Coal
Oil
Gas
7,698
198 Coal
Oil
Gas 1,779
199 Oil
Gas 480
340
31,384
184
5,800
60,113
200 No plants
201 Coal
Oil
Gas 1,842
202 Coal
Oil
Gas 5,288
203 Coal
Oil
Gas 3,560
204 Oil
South Carolina Coal
Total Oil
Gas 21,902
22
5,558
27
23,199
4
20,254
66,160
1,254
60,113 155,132
o
Includes fuel use for sources listed on Table D-l Qnly-
Coal in 10 tons/yr; oil in 10 gals/yr; gas in 10 ft /yr.
No plants contributing to 90% of the AQCR emissions or emitting 1000 tons per year
or more.
Interstate.
-------
APPENDIX E
Area Source Assessment
-------
Table E-l. South Carolina Area Source Fuel Use
Coal Residual Oil Distillate Oil Natural Gas
AQCR (103 tons/yr) (103 gals/yr) (103 gals/yr) (106 ft3/yr)
53a
58a
167a
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
Total
19
10
82
10
17
29
20
n/a
10
6
203
270,300
2,900
4,250
190
440
7,380
2,340
n/a
870
1,440
290,110
218,510
17,920
138,210
10,830
14,310
57,360
41,650
n/a
17,790
18,720
535,300
20,350
14,530
36,620
3,130
8,830
9,440
6,710
n/a
6,830
2,580
109,020
3.
Interstate - Fuel use figures are for entire AQCR.
-------
APPENDIX F
Fuels Assessment
-------
Table F-l. South Carolina Clean Fuels Analysis Summary
AQCR Fuel
53C Coal
58C
16?c
198
199
200
201
202 Coal
203
204
South Carolina
Total Coal
Existing Regulations
Clean Fuels Requirements3
<1%S 1-2%S
314
None
None
None
None
None
None
922
None
None
1,236
Minimum Clean Fuels Savings
Through Regulation Modification'3
<1%S 1-2IS
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
Includes fuel use from power plants and industrial/commercial/institutional sources.
Coal in 10^ tons/yr.
"'Based on modeling results there is no allowable shift in fuel sulfur content that would
result in a clean fuels saving.
"Interstate.
-------
REFERENCES
1. Modeling Analysis of Power Plants for Compliance Extensions in 51 Air
Quality Control Regions, report prepared under ContracOfo. 68-02-0049
for the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Wai den Research Division
of Abcor, Inc., Cambridge, Mass., December 17, 1973.
2. Steam Electric Plant Factors, 1973, National Coal Association, Washington,
D. C., January, 1974.
3. Power plant data file, unpublished, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency,
Research Triangle Park, N. C.
4. Power plant SO emission estimates, unpublished data, U. S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, N. C.
5. National Emissions Data Systems data bank, U. S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Research Triangle Park, N. C.
6. Bituminous Coal Facts, 1972, National Coal Association, Washington, D. C.
-------
TECHNICAL REPORT DATA
(Please read luitniciions on ttic rvvmc before completine)
i. REPORT NO.
2.
3. RECIPIENT'S ACCESSIOC*NO.
4. TITLE ANDSUBTITLE
IMPLEMENTATION PLAN REVIEW FOR SOUTH CAROLINA
APPENDICES
5. REPORT DATE
6. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE
7. AUTHORIS)
8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NO
3. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS
10. PROGRAM ELEMENT NO.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air
Quality Planning and Standards, Research Triangle Park,
N.C., Region IV Office, Atlanta, Ga., and Argonne .
National Laboratory, Argonne, 111. •
11. CONTRACT/GRANT NO.
12. SPONSORING AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS
13. TYPE OF REPORT AND PERIOD COVERED
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Air and Waste Management
Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards
Research Triangle' Park, N.C. 27711
14. SPONSORING AGENCY CODE
15, SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES
16. ABSTRACT
Section IV of the Energy Supply and Environmental Coordination Act of 1974,
(ESECA) requires EPA to review each State Implementation Plan, (SIP) to determine
if revisions can be made to control regulations for stationary fuel combustion
sources without interfering with the attainment and maintenance of the national
ambient air quality standards. This document contains the technical appendices
used in EPA's review.
7.
KEY WORDS AND DOCUMENT ANALYSIS
DESCRIPTORS
b. IDENTIFIERS OPEN ENDED TERMS c. COSATI 1 iclJ Grimy
Air pollution
State Implementation Plans
3. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT
Release unlimited
19. StCUHITY CLASS {I Ins Report/
Unclassified
21. NO. Of- PAGES
28
20. SECURITY CLASS I this page/
Unclassified
22. PRICE
EPA Form 2220-1 (9-73)
------- |