EPA-450/3-76-008
FEBRUARY 1974
DETERMINATION
OF PARTICULATE EMISSION
FACTORS FOR BOILERS
AND INCINERATORS
BRONX AND MANHATTAN
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Office of Air and Waste Management
Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards
Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711
-------
EPA-450/3-76-008
DETERMINATION
OF PARTICULATE EMISSION
FACTORS FOR BOILERS
AND INCINERATORS
BRONX AND MANHATTAN
by
E. W. Savoie and M. Kormanik
Environmental Conservation Research, Inc.
SO Wolf Road
Albany, NY 12201
Contract No. 68-02-1070
EPA Project Officer: Gerard Soffian
EPA Technical Officer: Peter Westlin
Prepared for
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Office of Air and Waste Management
Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards
Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
February 1974
-------
This report is issued by the Environmental Protection Agency to report
technical data of interest to a limited number of readers. Copies are
available free of charge to Federal employees, current contractors and
grantees, and nonprofit organizations - as supplies permit - from the
Air Pollution Technical Information Center, Environmental Protection
Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711; or, for a fee,
from the National Technical Information Service, 5285 Port Royal Road,
Springfield, Virginia 22161.
This report was furnished to the Environmental Protection Agency by
Environmental Conservation Research, Inc., in fulfillment of Contract
No. 68-02-1070. The contents of this report are reproduced herein as
received from Environmental Conservation Research, Inc. The opinions,
findings, and conclusions expressed are those of the author and not
necessarily those of the Environmental Protection Agency. Mention
of company or product names is not to be considered as an endorsement
by the Environmental Protection Agency.
Publication No. EPA-450/3-76-008
11
-------
ABSTRACT
The purpose of this project was to determine particulate emission factors
for residual oil-fired boilers and flue-fed incinerators in apartment houses in
South Bronx and Upper Manhattan, New York City. Twenty-five boilers were tested
ranging in age from new to fifty years old, with maximum burning rates ranging
from 14 to 100 gallons of fuel per hour. Twenty-one incinerators were tested
with charging rates from 84 to 383 pounds per hour. All installations were
tested as found, that is, no adjustment or maintenance other than cleaning the
incinerator was performed prior to .conducting the tests.
Tests were conducted utilizing the particulate sampling train developed by
the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
The emission factors on a dry filter basis were determined to be:
a. 24.0 pounds of particulate per 1000 gallons of low sulfur residual
fuel oil.
b. 1. 18.9 pounds of particulate per ton of refuse burned.
2. 7.9 pounds of particulate per ton of refuse charged.
The emission factors on a total (filter plus impinger) basis were found to bei
a. 33.5 pounds of particulate per 1000 gallons of low sulfur residual
fuel oil.
b. 1. 32.9 pounds of particulate per ton of refuse burned.
2. 13.9 pounds of particulate per ton of refuse charged.
111
-------
Acknowledgements
The authors wish to acknowledge the assistance and cooperation of the New
York City Department of Air Resources for their help in conducting pre-test
inspections of equipment and installations.
Acknowledgement is also due to the New York State Department of Environ-
mental Conservation who.se personnel conducted the actual sampling of emissions.
The authors also wish to acknowledge the assistance and cooperation of the
following agencies for their help in making it possible to conduct this
project:
New York City. Housing Authority
New York City Department of Sanitation
New York State Division of Laboratories and Research
The authors wish to acknowledge their gratitude to the owners of the
apartment houses where the tests were conducted.
IV
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Purpose " Page 1
Procedure
Site Selection Page 1
Actual Sampling .....' Page 3
Calculations ..... Page 6
Tabulations of Site Information
Boiler Equipment Page 8
Burner Equipment Page 9 .
Boiler Auxiliary Equipment Page 10
Incinerator Equipment Page 11
Incinerator Auxiliary Equipment Page 12
Results
Test Date Information Page 13
Boiler Data - Table 1 Page 14
Carbon Balance - Table 2 Page 15
Individual Boiler Emission Factors - Table 3 Page 16
Average Boiler Emission Factors - Table 4 Page 18
Incinerator Test Data - Table 5 Page 19
Individual Incinerator Emission Factors - Table 6 Page 20
Average Incinerator Emission Factors - Table 7 Page 22
Incinerator Operation - Table 8 Page 23
Discussion of Results Page 24
Conclusion Page 26
Appendices
Stack Insert A-2
Oil Meter Performance Curve A-3
Oil Meter Recalibration Results A-4
Computer Printout of Emission Data B-l
Stack Testing Personnel C-l
Fuel Analysis D-l
Sample Forms E-l
Additional Boiler Test Results F-l
Technical Report Data Sheet G-l
-------
DETERMINATION OF PARTICULATE EMISSION FACTORS FOR-
BOILERS AND INCINERATORS IN MULTIPLE DWELLINGS
BRONX AND MANHATTAN
PURPOSE
The purpose of this project was to determine particulate emission
factors for residual (#6) oil fired boilers and flue-fed incinerators in
apartment houses in the South Bronx and Upper Manhattan areas of New York
City. These areas were chosen because ambient air quality standards for
particulates are being exceeded in these geographic areas of the City.
PROCEDURE
1. Site Selection
Since it was not possible to stack test every installation within
the prescribed geographic area, a procedure was needed to test; a number of
sites based principally on the degree of upgrading and the geographic location.
A list of possible sites (dated 9/20/72) was supplied by the New York City
Department of Air Resources and through joint meetings of Federal and City
personnel the list was divided into categories A, B, C, D, or upgraded, as
follows:
Rating Boiler Criteria #in Manhattan #in Bronx Total
A The presence of both a 17 25 42
wind box and barometric
damper (or sequential
draft controller)
B Only wind box persent 7 12 19
C Only barometric damper 31 44 75
D Neither wind box nor 36 48 84
damper
Total Surveyed 91 129 220
Upgraded - Those boiler installations complying with design criteria mandated
by the New York City Department of Air Resources.
Twenty-five boiler sites were tested.
Ratine Boiler Criteria #in Manhattan #in Bronx Total
A Installation with,at 7 6 13
least a scrubber and
burner
-------
B At least a burner but 35 22 57
no scrubber
C Neither a scrubber 21 79 100
nor burner
Total Surveyed 63 107 170
Upgraded - Those incinerator installations complying with design criteria
mandated by the New York City Department of Air Resources.
Twenty-one incinerator sites were tested.
Using the lists as a starting point, the owners of approximately 70
incinerator sites were contacted by a letter requesting permission to test
their boiler and incinerator and to install the necessary ports or equipment
required for the tests. A pretest inspection was conducted at sites where
permission was granted to gather information necessary to conduct the tests.
Some sites were rejected for the following reasons:
a. Chimney falling apart or leaning at a dangerous angle.
b. Missing bricks or unusual configuration at top preventing
use of a stack insert.
c. Stack height would require too much scaffolding, and exhaust
velocities were too low to utilize ports in chimney.
d. Chimney too far from roof.
e. Roof considered unsafe for equipment.
f. Stacks common for other boilers, incinerators and/or hot
water heaters.
g. Difficulty with removing spark arrester.
h. Stack too small for insert and velocities too low for sampling.
i. Boilers burning No. 2 or No. 4 oil instead of residual fuel
oil.
j. Impossible to install oil meters.
k. Installation inoperative during duration of project.
1. Site razed.
m. Fear of damage suits (only verbal approval granted).
n. Incorrect boiler or incinerator category.
o. Location in borough outside target area.
The sites tested have been assigned a code number in the following
manner:
Site A1BHB -
A e Category A
1 = Site number one within the category
B = Located in Bronx (M designates Manhattan)
H « Public Housing Authority site (P designates private ownership)
B a Boiler Installation (I designates incinerator)
- 2 -
-------
2. Actual Sampling
Particulate Sampling was accomplished isokinetically with the train
developed by U.S. Environmental Protection Agency complete with the MSA 1106BH
filter, optional cyclone, and impinger section. In most cases, a 12 inch x 12 inch
stack insert with built-in ports was inserted into the chimney, thus elimina-
ting the possibility that particulate adhering to the chimney wall would bias
the results, and imparting a needed higher velocity to the exhaust gases so
that tests could be conducted. Fiberglass insulation was used to secure a
seal between the chimney and the insert plate.
At the initiation of the project, sampling points were selected in
the center of four six inch by six inch areas in accordance with previously
published recommendations.* At the request of U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Region II, the sampling points were changed to the center of eight
three inch by six inch areas.
At boiler tests, two test trains removed samples simultaneously,
one from each of two ports. Since the spacing of the ports did not permit
the boxes to be placed side by side, one box was equipped with a three foot
glass probe, the other with a five foot glass probe. (See Appendix A).
Halfway through the run (30 minutes) the probes were replaced with clean
probes, the filter boxes reversed and the test completed. Occasionally, due
to a blown fuse or a breakdown of one of the sampling trains, the finishing
times of the two trains were different.
At incinerator tests, samples were extracted consecutively, ,each
test run usually lasting for one hour.
The probe wash, filters and impinger catch were sent to the
New York State Division of Laboratories and Research in Syracuse for analysis.
Boiler Operation at the initiation of the project was planned to
take place by cycling the burner to operate 25% of each hour, with sampling
trains turned on and off to match burner operation. It was assumed this
cyclic operation would represent a compromise between cold weather and warm
weather boiler operation. It soon became obvious the sites had modulating
type burners which ran continuously during the morning hours even though
the weather was mild. Therefore, tests were taken during continuous
operation.
The scope of the study included the determination of soot blowing
emissions. Our inspections located several installations with soot blowing
equipment, all at Public Housing Authority Sites which had large stacks.
1. "Specifications for Incinerator Testing at Federal Facilities,"
U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, National Center for
Air Pollution Control, Durham, North Carolina, October 1967.
- 3 -
-------
It was necessary to sample from ports in the chimney since our small stack
insert was not suitable for use in such large stacks. The low stack velo-
cities necessitated the use of a micromanometer for velocity measurement.
The usual soot blow operation consisted of blowing compressed air for two
second intervals, followed by a 5-10 minute pause while pressure was restored
to the equipment. This cyclic operation took place three times daily,
usually lasted 20-30 minutes but sometimes extended to one hour, and
normally would be activated in the early morning hours. The superintendent
was instructed to postpone the early operation on the day of testing and
activate the mechanism for our tests. Changes in stack velocity during
the soot blowing period were not detectable.
Incinerator Operation was determined by simulating the normal
operation as determined by inspection and information supplied by the
building superintendent. The superintendent was sometimes able to indicate
the volume of refuse normally present at ignition. More often the quantity
to be charged was determined after measurement of the combustion chamber
volume as follows:
Combustion Chamber
Refuse Charged = Volume x 4.1 pounds
2 cu. ft.
The incinerator was first cleaned and then charged with weighed refuse.'
All charging hoppers were taped closed, The refuse was ignited by the
burner or by a match when necessary, and sampling started as soon as
measurable velocities were detected. After one hour or a minimum of 30 ft
of sampled gas, the fire was extinguished. Prior to the first test run, a
garden hose was "calibrated" by noting the quantity of water (spray) delivered
per unit time from a spigot available at the site. Later, the water spray
was used to extinguish the fire with care taken to avoid spraying the hot
refractory, and the time duration of spraying was noted to determine the
quantity of water added to the refuse. Half of this added water was assumed
absorbed into the refuse, and the other half was assumed to either evaporate
or drain away. The refuse was removed and weighed and half of the sprayed
water subtracted to determine the amount of refuse remaining after the test.
The cleaned incinerator was again charged as before and the same procedure
followed for the second test run.
During our later tests, the ashes were extinguished by shoveling
them into garbage cans and covering tightly to smother the fire. While the
second procedure eliminated the possible error introduced by the addition
of water, it introduced a smaller new error by allowing some burning to
continue during the cleaning operation.
Bacharach readings were taken at each boiler site where a small
hole could be placed in the breeching immediately after the boiler. At
multiple boiler installations the readings were taken in the common breeching
directly after the point of juncture. At some sites the breeching was not
accessible. The measurements were taken every five minutes during burner
operation. The instructions accompanying the instruments were followed.
-------
Smoke (opacity) readings were taken at each boiler and incinerator
site by qualified observers.
Oil Meters were installed by licensed servicemen at each boiler site
in the locations determined by New York City Department of Air Resources
inspectors or the servicemen. The meters selected (recommended by New York
City Department of Air Resources) were Neptune 5/8" type S meters with
horizontal totalizer register model 15^ complete with gasket type couplings
and tail piece and %" strainer. This meter has a recommended range for
bunker oil of 2 to 10 GPM, 150 PSI maximum working pressure, 250°F maximum
temperature. The face of the register consists of six numeral wheels to
indicate tens of gallons, and a circular needle indicator marked to ten-one
gallon divisions. (See performance curve, Appendix A).
Installed meters were read immediately, everytime the burner turned
on or off. Estimates were made to the nearest 4- gallon.
Most boiler sites required the installation of two meters, one in
the oil supply line and one in the oil return line. A few sites required a
third meter where piping permitted recirculation of heated oil.
All meters were calibrated before delivery. At the conclusion of
testing the meters were recalibrated. Since calibration is normally performed
on thoroughly cleaned meters, we requested the calibration procedure be
performed on some of the meters as they were received from the sites and
again after a thorough cleaning. (See Appendix A).
Oil Temperature measurements were taken at most installations
either by utilizing available temperature gages or measuring the temperature
of extracted samples.
Orsat Analysis was performed on samples typically taken on the roof
at each boiler and incinerator site. Generally, two integrated samples
(each for 30 minutes) were taken at each site consistent with EPA method 3,
40 CFR 60.85, analyzed, and the results averaged.
Equipment Check Lists were completed by personnel associated with
the project by inspections at each site during the execution of the project.
It was not possible in every instance to conclusively verify data relating
to age, capacity, normal operating temperature and pressure, operating
condition of equipment, etc.
Oil Samples were taken at the completion of sampling from existing
taps or by breaking the bypass piping. Two samples were taken at each
boiler site, one for delivery to New York City Department of Air Resources
and one for shipping to U.S,. EPA in Durham, N.C.. The analysis for carbon
content performed by EPA, Quality Assurance and Environmental Monitoring
Laboratory in North Carolina, was utilized in computation of a carbon
•balance as part of this project.
Boiler room temperatures and breeching temperatures were also
measured.
- 5 -
-------
3. Calculations
The equations developed by EPA and published in the Federal Register
of December 23, 1971, (Vol. 36, No. 247) as referenced below were used for
all calculations relating to emissions expressed in terms of grain loading.
Additional equations necessary for calculation of emissions in terms of
weight loading are presented.
a. Stack Velocity and Flow Rates EPA equations 2-1 thru 2-3
Q's = 3600 (Vs Avg.) A (Tstd/Ts Avg>), (Ps/Pstd)
Where Q*s•= total volumetric flow rate of stack gases,
including moisture, scf/hr
b. Orsat Analysis EPA equation 3-2
c. Moisture Determination EPA equations 4-1 thru 4-3
d. Particulate Emissions EPA equations 5-1 thru 5-6
Ws = (1.0 lb/454.000 mq.) Mn Q's
V total
Where Ws = weight rate of particulate emissions, Ib/hr
Mn = total dry filter catch, or
Mn = total (wet and dry) catch, including condensables,
used alternately to determine emissions in terms
of total catch.
e. Carbon Balance
Ibs C per hour in fuel =
gal x S.G. Fuel (60°) x 8.33 Ibs (water 60°F) x Ib C
hr gal Ib fuel
Ibs C emitted per hour = Q's (% CO? + % CO) 492°R x 12
100 530°R 359
f. Refuse charged per hour = Amount charged -f- duration of burn
(Duration of burn is taken as elapsed time from start to finish
of test)
g. Refuse burned per hour =
Amount charged - (ash weight - •§• weight of added water)
duration of burn
- 6 -
-------
h. Emission factor
Ibs particulate _ Ws x 103
1000 gal fuel gal of fuel per min x 60
i. Emission factor
Ibs particulate -
106 BTU
Ws ;. .
Gallon of fuel per min x 60 S.G.(fuel, 60°) x 8.33 Ibs x BTU(fuel)
- 7 -
-------
BOILER EQUIPMENT
Site
A1BHB
A2BPB
A3BHB
A4MPB
A5MPB
A6BPB
A7MPB
A8MPB
A9MPB
A10BHB
B1MPB
B2BPB
B3BPB
B4MPB
B5BPB
C1BHB
D1MPB
D2MPB
D3MPB
D4BPB
U1BPB
U2MPB
U3MPB
U4MPB
U5BPB
Manufacturer
Fitzgibbons
Pacific
Fitzgibbons
Fitzgibbons
Pacific
Fitzgibbons
Crotty
National
National
Fitzgibbons
Oil City
Kewanee
Oil City
Pacific
Pacific
Fitzgibbons
Federal
Rockmill
Coke fair
Pacific
Fitzgibbons
Oil City
Federal
Pacific
Fitzgibbons
Model No.
MD13990
67L2
A1781
RM242
NoA.
RM182
6438
MD16571
MD13425
MD44371
NoA.
RM242
MFG6615M
215LA
22595
MD44326
FST90
MD14246
N.Ao
N.Ao
RM182
MD10616
FM18220
9151
RM182
Material
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Tube Type
Fire Tube
Fire Tube
Fire Tube
Fire Tube
Fire Tube
Fire Tube
Fire Tube
Fire Tube
Fire Tube
Fire Tube
Fire Tube
Fire Tube
Fire Tube
Fire Tube
Fire Tube
Fire Tube
Fire Tube
Fire Tube
Fire Tube
Fire Tube
Fire Tube
Fire Tube
Fire Tube
Fire Tube
Water Tube
Approx. Age of
Boiler - Years
N.A,
16
11
30
25
30
15
30
30
12
30
25
24
15
30
18
15
New
50
37
30
30
12
15
N.Ao
N.A. - Not Available
-------
BURNER EQUIPMENT
vO
I
Site
A1BHB
A2BPB
A3BHB
A4MPB
A5MPB
A6BPB
A7MPB
A8MPB
A9MPB
A10BHB
B1MPB
B2BPB
B3BPB
B4MPB
B5BPB
C1BHB
D1MPB -
D2MPB
D3MPB
D4BPB
U1BPB
U2MPB
U3MPB
U4MPB
U5BPB
Manufacturer
Todd
Superior
Todd
Petro
Petro
Enterprise
York
Uniflow
Uniflow
Todd
Petro
Enterprise
Ray
Ray
Petro
Todd
Hev-E-Oil
Petro
Petro
Petro
Enterprise
Hev-E-Oil
Petro
Petro
Petro
Model No.
N.A.
ABAA6-250
187935
W-6
DP8559
62900
055-175
N.A.
1013
4-ML
N.A.
3450-G
60N
550
N.A.
F268557
AM6E
DP7109
6AH
N.A.
62900
AM6-E
WD6AH
WD5AH
W5AH
Type*
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Firing Control
Modulating
Modulating
Modulating
Modulating
Modulating
Modulating
Modulating
Modula'ting
Modulating
Modulating
Modulating
Modulating
Modulating
Modulating
On-Off
Modulating
Modulating
Modulating
On-Off
On-Off
Modulating
Modulating
Modulating
Modulating
Modulating
*Type Burner
1 - Horizontal Rotary Cup
2 - Air Atomizer
3 - Steam Atomizer
N.A. - Not Available
-------
BOILER AUXILIARY EQUIPMENT
o
a
Site
A1BHB
A2BPB
A3BHB
A4MPB
A5MPB
A6BPB
A7MPB
A8MPB
A9MPB
A10BHB
B1MPB
B2BPB
B3BPB
B4MPB
B5BPB
C1BHB
D1MPB
D2MPB
D3MPB
D4BPB
U1BPB
U2MPB
U3MPB
U4MPB
U5BPB
Primary
Oil Heater
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Secondary
Oil Heater
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Combustion
Controller
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Sequential
Draft Contr.
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
N.A.
Yes
Yes
Barometric
Damper
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Windbox
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
N.A. - Not Available
-------
INCINERATOR EQUIPMENT
Site
Code
A1MHI
A2BHI
B1BHI
B2BHI
B3BHI
B4MPI
B5BHI
C1MPI
C2MPI
C3MPI
C4BPI
C5MPI
C6BPI
C7BPI
C8BPI
C9MPI
C10MPI
U1BPI
U2MPI
U3MPI
U4BHI
Manufacturer
Morse Bougler
Oswald Co.
Kernerator
Kernerator
Unknown
Equal-Air
Unknown
Kernerator
Kernerator
Ventomatic
Kernerator
George E. Sealy
PGM
Interboro
Kernerator
Ventomatic
Kerner
Kernerator
Kerner
Equal-Air
Sargent
Model
#
N.A.
SFD2R
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A. .
N.A.
1828B
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
Flue
Desiqn
S or D
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
N.A.
S
S
S
S
S
S
Combustion
Chamber
S or M
N.A.
S
S
S
S
M
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
M
M
Chamber
Volume
ft3
210
150
60.75
120
180
64
96
N.A.
105
96
N.A.
48
110
56
N.A.
N.A.
44
360
44
64
177
Grate
Area
ft2
N.A.
25
3
8
18
16
16
12
5
no grate
no grate
12
13.5
16
6
N.A.
11
40
11
16
24
N.A. - Not Available
S.- Single
D - Double
M - Multiple
-------
INCINERATOR AUXILIARY EQUIPMENT
Site
Code
A1MHI
A2BHI
B1BHI
B2BHI
B3BHI
B4MPI
B5BHI
C1MPI
C2MPI
C3MPI
C4BPI
C5MPI
C6BPI
C7BPI
C8BPI
C9MPI
C10MPI
U1BPI
U2MPI
U3MPI
U4BHI
Primary
Burner
Y or N
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Auxiliary
Burner
Y or N
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Gas
Usage
CFM
N.A.
1.7-
12.5
5
N.A.
N.A.
50
N.A.
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
N.A.
Yes
50
N.A.
Gas
Scrubber
Y or N
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Over Fire
Air Fan &
Nozzle System
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes~
Cycling
Clock
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Charging
Gate
Yes
Yes
No
No
Yes
Yes*
No
Yes
No
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
*Same as U3MPI except scrubber bypassed
N.A. - Not Available
-------
TEST DATE INFORMATION
Site Code
A1BHB
A2BMB
A3BHB
A4MPB
A5MPB
A6BPB
A7MPB
A8MPB
A9MPB
A10BHB
B1MPB
B2BPB
B3BPB
B4MPB
B5BPB
C1BMB
D1MPB
D2MPB
D3MPB
D4BPB
U1BPB
U2MPB
U3MPB
U4MPB
U5BPB
Date
Tested
6-5-73
5-4-73
6-23-73
4-14-73
3-21-73
. 5-7-73
4-13-73
4-30-73
5-1-73
6-26-73
4-11-73
4-10-73
4-6-73
4-3-73
5-12-73
6-27-73
3-27-73
3-23-73
4-4-73
5-5-73
5-22-73
4-20-73
4-18-73
5-11-73
5-22-73
Ambient T °F @ 10 A.M.
80
60
73
45
37
60
40
59
64
71
36
50
51
52
64
69
46
41
46
47
67
57
68
61
67
Stack
Insert
Used
No
Yes
No
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
- 13 -
-------
TABLE 1
BOILER DATA
Site
Code
A1BHB
A2BPB
A3BHB
A4MPB
A5MPB
A6BPB
A7MPB
A8MPB
A9MPB
A10BHB
B1MPB
B2BPB
B3BPB
B4MPB
B5BPB
C1BHB
D1MPB
D2MPB
D3MPB
D4BPB
U1BPB
U2MPB
U3MPB
U4MPB
U5BPB
Boiler
Room
Avq. TOP
82
92
88
72
75
103
79
90
81
80
73
89
84
106
98
85
103
78
88
87
82
80
86
93
86
Breeching
Avq. T°F
204
393
273
379
369
399
454
422
342
303
328
342
372
478
454
292
530
N.A.
403
375
394
282
249
402
393
Oil Supply
Line
Avq. T°F
110
145
150
108
119
130
N.A.
134
102
157
100
120
104
106
N.A.
146
146
105
138
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
153
N.A.
Average
% 009
1.9
5.2
0.6
3.0
5.3
4.8
6.0
5.8
4.5
1.7
3.7
3.4
5.0
5.6
7.0
1.6
7.0
5.8
5.6
4.8
1.5
5.5
3.5
5.4
4.4
Orsat
% 02
18.1
11.8
20.0
14.5
13.3
12.8
12.9
12.5
14.5
18.9
19.0
14.1
13.2
13.1
10.8
19.1
10.7
13.7
13.1
13.5
18.9
11.8
16.0
13.4
13.4
Results
% 00
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.4
0.3
0.0
0.1 .
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.2
0.0
0.0
0.2
0.0
0.1
0.5
0.5
0.2
1.0
0.2
0.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
Bacharach
Avq . No .
1.6
2.0
N.A.
3.4
3.8
6.0
0.3
1.0
1.0
0
2.5
6.0
4.5
1.5
5.4
0
1.0
N.A.
1.0
8.9
7.5
0.4
0.4
6.7
10.
Range of
Ringlemann
No.
0
N.Ao
0*
0
N.A.
0
0-3
0
0
.1-.5*
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
1-2
0-1
N.A.
N.A.
2.5-4.0
0
1.0
0-.5
N.A.
0
0-3
N.A.
N.A. - Not Available
*Smoke Density Meter Redding
-------
TABLE 2
CARBON BALANCE
Code No.
A1BHB
A2BPB
A3BHB
A4MPB
A5MPB
A6BPB
A7MPB
A8MPB
A9MPB
A10BHB
B1MPB
B2BPB
B3BHB
B4MPB
B5BPB
C1BPB
D1MPB
D2MPB
D3MPB
D4BPB
U1BPB
U2MPB
U3MPB
U4MHB
U5BPB
Fuel Carbon
Avg. input Ibs/hr.
370
206
510
209
68
180
195
364
319
551
164
109
121
184
260
630
132
212
260
270
190
195
130
174
215
Orsat Carbon
Avq. output Ibs/hr.
299
162
211
323
116
151
184
157
115
183
122
97
111
160
147
645
136
181
157
164
39
147
226
172
114
- 15 -
-------
TABLE 3
INDIVIDUAL BOILER EMISSION FACTORS
EMISSION FACTORS
Site
Code
A1BHB
A2BPB
A3BHB
A4MPB
A5MPB
^A6BPB
A7MPB
A8MPB
A9MPB
A10BHB
Fuel
gal/hr
67.8
94.6
*89.2
32.1
32.1
79.5
79.5
*63.3
31.4
33.0
10.6
10.6
10.6
28
28
30.5
30.5
56.2
56.2
49.5
49.5
75.6
75.6
*70.4
Dry Catch
Gr/SCF
@ 12# C02
.100
.088
.069
.136
.150
.086
.067
.404
.133
.114
" .122
.062
.049
.058
.074
.042
.042
.169
.053
.024
.087
.312
.056
.050
Ib/hr
1.10
1.03
1.02
.83
.91
.65
.57
2.26
1.48
1.22
.52
.25
.20
.33
.40
.27
.30
1.01
.32
.11
.33
2.19
.38
.64
Total
Ib/hr
2.09
2.18
2.84
1.19
1.14
1.88
2.08
4.84
2.10
2.13
.62
.37
.29
.60
.83
.54
.62
1.22
.65
.24
.50
2.56
.83
1.3
Dry Catch
lb/106 BTU
0.112
0.075
0.079
0.179
0.196
0.056
0.050
0.247
0.324
0.255
0.339
0.163
0.130
0.081
0.099
0.061
0.068
0.124
0.039
0.015
0.046
0.200
0.035
0.063
lb/1000 gal
16.3
10.9
11.4
25.7
28.3
8.2
7.2
35.6
47.0
37.1
49.3
23.8
18.8
11.7
14.4
8.8
10.0
17.9
5.6
2.1
6.8
29.0
5.1
9.1
Total
lbs/1000 gal
30.8
23.0
31.9
37.2
35.6
23.7
26.2
76.4
66.9
64.7
58.3
34.6
27.4
21.3
29.6
17.7
20.2
21.7
11.7
4.8
10.2
33.9
11.0
18.5
* Soot Blow Test
** Probable Firing
* U1BPB same site as A6BPB. U1BPB tests conducted after serviceman
adjustments to installation.
- 16 -
-------
TABLE 3 (,Continued)
EMISSION FACTORS
Site
Code
B1MPB
B2BPB
B3BPB
B4MPB
B5BPB
C1BHB
D1MPB
D2MPB
D3MPB
D4BPB
HJ1BPB
U2MPB
U3MPB
U4MPB
U5BPB
Fuel
gal/hr
25.5
25.5
16.9
16.9
18.8
18.8
28.6
28.6
39.3
39.3
98.0
98.0
*99.5
*99.5
**16.0
**16.0
32.9
32.9
40.6
41.0
42.0
42.0
29.4
29.4
30.4
30.4
**20.2
**20.2
26.4
26.4
33.3
33.3
Dry Cat
Gr/SCF
@ 12# C02
.102
.090
.063
.129
.057
.049
.034
.050
.058
.176'
.036
.015
.032
.037
.028
.026
.855
.888
.037
.073
.328
.211
.885
..346
.049
.017
.009
.013
.076
.082
.494
.596
ch
Ib/hr
.43
.41
.26
.46
.22
.22
.20
. .28
.31
1.03
.73
.27
.74
.93
.14
.12
5.61
3.76
.21
.41
1.74
1.13
1.46
.55
.25
.09
.24
.26
.45
.49
2.37
2.85
Total
Ib/hr
06!
.66
.53
.76
.42
.36
.31
.37
.49
1.42
1.89
1.95
2.17
2.25
.23
.26
5.83
3.90
.76
.72
2.02
1.68
1.81
.73
.33
.20
.48
.41
.68
.68
2.55
3.05
Dry Catch
lb/106 BTU
0.116
0.111
0.106
0.188
0.081
0.081
0.048
0.068
0.054
0.181
0.051
0.019
0.051
0.065
0.060
0.052
1.178
0.789
0.036
0.069
0.286
0.186
0.343
0.129
0.057
0.020
0.082
0.0889
0.118
0.128
0.492
0.591
lb/1000 gal
17.0
16.1
15.1
27.3
11.6
11.8
7.0
9.7
8.0
26.1
7.4
2.7
7.4
9.4
8.5
7.6
169.9
114.4
5.3
10.1
41.4
26.9
49.8
18.6
8.1
2.8
11.9
12.9
17.2
18.4
71.2
85.4
Total
lbs/1000 gal
24.0
25.9
31»5
45.2
22.2
18.9
10.7
12.9
12.6
36.1
19.3
19.8
21.8
22.6
14.5
16.0
176.3
118.5
18.7
17.5
48.0
39.9
61.7
24.7
10.9
6.5
23.8
20.2
25.6
25.8
76.7
91.5
* Soot Blow Test
*•* Probable Firing
Rate
- 17 -
-------
00
I
Boiler
Category
A
B
C
D
U
A
B
C
D
U
DRY (FILTER) CATCH ONLY
Manhattan
Gr/SCF
@ 12% CQo
.815
.069
-
.323
.041
Ib/hr
.546
.330
-
1.71
.297
lb/106 BTU
.142
.086
-
.364
.082
lb/103 qal
20.7
12.5
-
52.6
11.9
EXCLUDING SOOT BLOW)
Bronx
Gr/SCF
@ 12% CO?
.113
.089
.026
.270
o580
Ib/hr
.839
.417
.50
1.435
1.808
lb/106 BTU
.108
.115
.035
.236
.389
lb/103 qal
15.7
16.7
5.1
34.2
56.3
Average of All Sources .155 gr/SCF @ 12% COg •
(Excluding Soot Blow) .813 Ib/hr
.167 lb/106 BTU
24.0 ib/103 gal
TOTAL (FILTER + IMPINGER) CATCH
(EXCLUDING SOOT BLOW)
—
_
-
_
-
.844
.488
-
1.95
.463
_
-
-
-
-
Average of All Sources
(Excluding Soot Blow)
30.7
18.4
-
60.3
18.8
_
-
-
-
-
1.19 Ib/hr
33 o 5 lb/103
1.538
.663
1.92
1.85
2.04
gal
_
-
-
-
-
27.2
27,8
19.6
44.0
63.7
m
I
tn
§
t-H
f1
m
m
in
CO
n
o
B
&
H
>
m
-------
TABLE 5
INCINERATOR TEST DATA
'v Run No. 1
Site
A1MHI
A2BHI
B1BHI
B2BHI
B3MHI
B4MPI
B5BHI
C1MPI
C2MPI
C3MPI
C4MPI
C5MPI
C6BPI
C7BPI
C8BPI
C9MPI
C10MPI
U1BPI
U2MPI
U3MPI
U4BHI
A1MHI
A2BHI
B1BHI
B2BHI
B3MHI
B4MPI
B5BHI
C1MPI
C2MPI
C3MPI
C4MPI
C5MPI
C6BPI
C7BPI
C8BPI
C9MPI
C10MPI
U1BPI
U2MPI
U3MPI
U4BHI
A1MHI
B2BHI
B3MHI
B5BHI
C1MPI
C2MPI
C3MPI
C4MPI
C5MPI
C6BPI
C7BPI
C8BPI
C9MPI
C10MPI
U1BPI
Refuse
Charged
(lb)
279.0
281.5
124.9
154
148.8
195.1
201
83.8
129.0
154
127.5
106.0
113.5
160.0
107.6
108
105.0
290.5
110.5
196.8
383.3
277.0
279.0
127.1
142.8
150
204.8
219.5
83.8
123.5
135.5
116.0
105.0
117.5
158.0
112.8
112.5
106.0
269.5
150.7
188.1
373.5
269.8
141.9
147
199.5
83.8
128.0
151.5
118
108.8
115.0
157.5
107.2
107.5
105.1
258.5
Refuse
Burned
(lb)
22.1
122.5
64.6
52.1
81
117.1
35.5
37.2
54.0
33
24.0
22.9
83.0
86.0
74
45.4
39.8
71.5
64.5
131.6
142.1
56.5
150.0
57.3
68.9
90
113.9
115
42.1
50.5
76
43.5
35.2
88.0
87.5
37.9
61.8
43.2
68.0
67.7
77.8
163.55
137.3
66.3
62.8
114
39.2
73.5
81.5
76
40.8
70.0
65.5
38.8
71
53.6
100.5
Refuse
Charging
Rate
(Ib/hr)
262
302
134
132
140
195
188
95
103
154
120
135
106
175
91
110
158
291
105
156
343
Run No. 2
260
299
136
138
132
205
205
105
99
125
102
131
110
155
121
116
159
284
117
128
334
Run No. 3
253
147
110
187
91
107
157
89
133
108
152
111
111
158
263
Jlefuse
Burning
Rate
(Ib/hr)
21
131
69
45
76
117
33
42
43
33
23
29
78
94
63
46
60
72
61
70
. 127
53
161
61
67
79
114
108
53
40
70
38
44
83
86
41
64
65
93
53
53
146
129
69
51
107
43
61
84
57
50
66
63
40
73
80
102
Amount of
Water to
Extinguish
Fire (lb)
none
none
none
none
none
10.3
none
8.7
none
2.0
none
20.6
none
none
none
none
25.9
61.0
none
45
none
Done
none
none
none
none
none
1.3
9.8
none
2.0
none
9.9
none
none
none
none
25.9
. 20.0
none
10.3
none
9.8
none
8.3
none
14.1
none
2.0
none
9.9
none
none
none
none
25.9
22.0
- 19 -
-------
TABLE 6
INDIVIDUAL INCINERATOR EMISSION FACTORS
EMISSION FACTORS
SITE
CODE
A1MHI
A2HHI
B1BHI
B2BHI
B3MHI
*B4MPI
B5BHI
G1MPI
C2MPI
C3MPI
I DRY
Gr/SCF
@12#C02
1.224
0.380
0.826
0.482
0.457
0.297
0.715
1.356
2.010
1.547
0.660
0.484
1.003
0.222
0.133
0.404
0.254
0.686
1.021
0.724
0.422
1.857
1.915
1.266
7.730
-
-
CATCH
Lb/Hr
0.48
0.22
0.55
0.61
1.06
0.49
0.84
0.79
0.96
0.70
0.43
0.58
0.97
0.30
0.23
0.50
0.57
1.18
0.68
0.35
0.22
0.71
0.58
0.45
0.34
0.62
1.04
I TOTAL
Lb/Hr
0.75
0.54
0.93
1.31
1.73
0.84
1.35
1.37
1.31
1.20
0.77
1.12
1.35
0.44
0.44
1.03
1.41
2.35
1.03
0.81
0.38
0.92
0.86
0.64
0.68
0.93
1.57
I DRY |
Lb/Ton
Charge
3.7
1.7
4.3
4.0
7.1
7.3
12.4
12.0
13.9
9.5
6.1
8.8
17.6
3.1
2.2
5.3
5.6
12.6
14.3
6.7
4.8
13.8
11.7
8.4
4.4
9.9
13.2
[ TOTAL
Lb/Ton
Charge .
5.7
4.2
7.4
8.7
11.6
12.5
19.9
20.8
19.0
16.3
11.0
17.0
24.5
4.5
4.3
11.0
13.8
25.1
21.7
15.4
8.4
17.9
17.4
12.0
8.8
14.9
20.0
I DRY |
Lb/Ton
Burn
45.6
8.3
8.6
9.4
13.2
14.1
27.6
35.0
28.7
20.3
11.3
14.8
38.1
8.6
4.1
30.2
10.6
22.0
32.6
13.3
10.0
31.7
28.8
14.9
19.2
17.6
24.7
TOTAL j
Lb/Ton
Burn
71.0
20.3
14.4
20.2
21.5
24.4
44.4
61.0
39.0
34.8
20.2
28.3
52.7
12.7
7.9
62.3
26.2
44.0
49.1
30.4
17.1
40.8
43.0
21.1
38.9
26.7
37.3
*Same site as U3MPI except scrubber bypassed.
- 20 -
-------
EMISSION FACTORS (Continued)
SITE
CODE
C4BPI
C5MPI
C6BPI
C7BPI
C8BPI
C9MPI
C10MPI
U1BPI
U2MPI
U3MPI
U4BHI
I DRY
Gr/SCF
1.355
1.262
0.536
0.559
0.207
0.268
0.339
0.669
0.678
0.621
2.618
1.130
0.934
0.505
2.216
3.056
0.676
'0.312
0.610
1.853
1.240
0.296
0.393
0.458
0.233
0.146
0.088
0.209
0.219
CATCH |
Lb/Hr
0.75
0.62
0.30
0.31
0.16
0.20
6.24
0.62
0.48
0.46
2.73
0.89
0.65
0.34
0.47
0.73
0.36
0.27
0.34
0.88
1.48
0.42
0.51
0.42
0.14
0.25
0.15
0.41
0.41
TOTAL
Lb/Hr
1.02
0.85
0.49
0.58
0.50
0.52
0.58
0.93
0.69
1.79
4.29
2.20
1.77
0.62
0.74
1.18
0.66
0.64
0.62
1.29
2.28
1.09
0.89
0.78
0.28
0.48
0.38
0.65
0.62
| DRY I
Lb/Ton
Charge
12.5
12.2
6.7
5.7
2.4
3.1
3.6
11.7
8.7
8.5
31.2
11.5
8.6
7.5
7.8
13.3
6.2
4.9
4.3
11.1
10.2
3.0
3.9
8.0
2.4
3.2
2.3
2.4
2.5
TOTAL |
Lb/Ton
Charqe
17.0
16.7
11.0
10.6
7.4
7.9
8.7
17.5
12.5
33.1
49.0
28.4
23.3
13.6
12.2
21.5
11.4
11.5
7.8
16.2
15.7
7.7
6.8
14.9
4.8
6.2
5.9
3.8
3.7
Drv 1
Lb/Ton
Burn
64.9
33.2
10.4
10.3
11.1
9.3
9.4
15.9
11.7
13.9
58.1
20.6
20.6
10.8
22.7
31.6
11.1
7.3
11.2
27.2
41.0
9.1
9.9
13.8
5.3
9.3
2.7
6.5
5.6
TOTAL 1
Lb/Ton
Burn
88.5
44.6
17.1
19.2
34.2
23.7
23.3
23.8
16.7
54.2
91.3
51.1
56.2
19.5
36.0
51.5
20.8
17.6
20.8
39.6
63.3
23.4
17.4
24.8
10.4
18.3
6.6
10.2
8.5
- 21 -
-------
DRY (FILTER) CATCH ONLY
Incinerator
Category
A
B
C
U
A
B
C
U
Manhattan
Gr/SCF
@ 12% COg
0.810
0.500
1.484
0.231
Ib/hf
0.42
0.50
0.48
0.24
Ib/ton
Charged
3.2
7.6
8.0
4.0
Ib/ton
Burned
20.8
15.4
18.3
7.8
Average of All Sources
.
Bronx
Gr/SCF
@ 12* C02
0.470
0.909
1.090
0.471
Ib/hr
0.84
0.75
0.72
0.65
Ib/ton
Charged
5.6
9.8
11.1
4.4
Ib/ton
Burned
11.3
23.6
24.4
14.4
0.959 gr/SCF @ 12% C02
0.58 Ib/hr
7.9 Ib/ton Charged
18.9 Ib/ton Burned
TOTAL (FILTER + IMPINGER) CATCH
-
-
-
0.74
0.82
0.81
0.48
Average
5.8
12.3
13.5
8.0
» of All SOL
35.2
24.4
31.5
15.0
rces
_
-
-
-
1.03 lb/
1.52
1.36
1.33
- 1.11
hr
10.2
17.3
20.4
7.5
20.9
42.0
43.2
24.6
13.9 Ib/ton Charged
32.9 Ib/ton Burned
m
o
m
m
g
en
CO
5
e
H
DO
m
~j
-------
. TABLE 8
INCINERATOR OPERATION
Site Code
A1MHI
A2BHI
B1BHI
B2BHI
B3MHI
B4MPI
B5BHI
C1MPI
C2MPI
C3MPI
C4BPI
C5MPI
C6BPI
C7BPI
C8BPI
C9MPI
C10MPI
U1BPI
U2MPI
U3MPI
U4BHI
Average Orsats
#002 #D2
.8
1.5
2.2
0.7
1.5
1.8
1.8
1.4
1.3
0.1
1.3
1.2-
1.7
.1.3
1.1
0.9
1.0
1.8
1.5
1.8
1.9
14.6
18.9
17.6
18.9
19.0
17.6
18.1
19.2
19.0
20.2
19.4
19.2
18.2
17.4
19.6
19.7
19.6
18.2
19.0
17.6
18.2
$00
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.6
0.2
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.0
o.o,
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.6
0.1
Range of
Rinqlemann No.
0
N.A.
N.A.
<1
<1-1'
0-1
.5
<1
2.5
-------
DISCUSSION OF RESULTS
Site Criteria
The pre-test inspections revealed the list of possible sites was in
error in several ways. Many of the listed sites had been razed and many of
the listed sites were outside the geographic area selected for the study.
In addition, many of the sites were listed in an incorrect category, and
many sites did not burn No. 6 fuel oil. Better than half the listed sites
were owned by the Public Housing Authority. It is apparent that the
number of sites assigned to a given category is incorrect and the total
number of actual installations is also inaccurate.
An additional complication of the site criteria relates to the status
of "upgraded" and how it is defined. On the surface it would appear that
any installation with a Certificate to Operate issued by the New York City
Department of Air Resources should be considered an upgraded unit. Some of
these certificates signify compliance with obsolete rules, therefore, the
"upgraded" category is not uniform as a group. Furthermore, some installa-
tions classified as in "A" category were in fact simply awaiting the
processing of permits since they satisfied all the equipment requirements
of the "upgraded" status. In consideration of the above difficulties, a
simple arithmetic average of all the emission factors was considered
appropriate.
Our method of gaining access to sites for testing was prompted by the
time limits established for the study and the large number of sites to be
tested during the specified time period. Many private apartment houses are
owned by groups of individuals (corporations). While this fact to some
extent facilitated gaining access for testing, it was curious that they
granted permission to test at some sites but not at others. It is our
belief we did not receive permission to test sites known to be in non-
compliance or known to be in a state of serious disrepair. This observation
is based on the refusal by many owners to allow us to test sites which were
under orders by New York City Department of Air Resources to upgrade by
December 31, 1973, and on the admission by some owners they would only allow
us to test sites which they were confident would meet the New York City Code.
A frequent observation by the test personnel and EPA observers was that
smoke of number three Ringelmann, or greater, was discharged from several
chimneys in the vicinity of each test but rarely by the site being tested.
Boilers
In addition to the uncertainties associated with site criteria, the
following factors must be considered in evaluating the validity of our results:
a. The fact that most burners operated continuously during the morning,
albeit the weather was mild, suggests the installations had been adjusted
for summer operation, or were capable by design of operating at a lower
burning level. Most sites were equipped with modulating type burner controls
- 24 -
-------
which could run continuously at a lower burning rate. Since the average
outdoor temperature was approximately 56°F the project may not have sampled
emissions that would be representative of yearly operation. (See Appendix F
for tests conducted during colder weather).
b. The use of stack inserts, while necessary to expedite the project
and obtain measurable stack velocities "must be regarded as an added resis-
tance to the chimney draft, with the expectation that reduced draft may
alter the emissions.
c. We experienced problems with maintaining heat to the probes for a
variety of reasons. Although retests were conducted whenever we were aware
the probe was not heating properly, an examination of the laboratory reports
reveals considerable fluctuation in the material washed from the probes.
We are aware that unheated probes might allow the formation of sulphates.
d. We also have doubts about being able to completely clean the glass
probes at the end of each test run. Our usual practice of flushing the
probe at least twice, with acetone, has usually proven satisfactory. We
note that failure to remove all adhering particulates could distort the
results of both the test completed and a following test run.
e. A study of the tabulated emissions from each boiler site readily
reveals that although essentially simultaneous tests were accomplished, the
results from some of these tests differ by 300$ or more. Accepting the
vagaries of particulate material in a gas stream, and allowing for slight
differences in the sampling trains or their operation, there is no reason
to expect the results from the two trains to be identical but they should
be much closer than some of the results we have obtained.
The emission factors shown in Table 4 do not display as clear a
relationship between emissions and the degree of upgrading as might be
expected. The lack of correlation may be due to faulty listing by category,
faulty testing procedures, ah inadequate number of tested sites, or factors
which might override the effect of upgrading such as proper maintenance, or
operation at less than full capacity, or all of these.
A comparison of Orsat, Bacharach, and Ringlemann readings in Table 1
reveals no clear relationship. Missing Orsat readings were caused by
punctured sample bags or inoperative pumps. Some Bacharach readings could
not be taken since the breeching was inaccessible. Missing Ringlemann
observations were caused by inadequate communication between the test teams,
supervising personnel, and the project engineer.
A study of the results of soot blow tests indicates that emissions
during soot blowing are generally more than those during non-soot blowing
operation as would be expected. Soot blow tests were conducted using
chimney ports and extremely low velocities were present. Even use of a
micromanometer could not produce velocity head readings which could be
considered accurate, therefore, the quantitative results are considered
questionable.
- 25 -
-------
Incinerators
In addition to the uncertainties associated with site criteria, the
following factors must be considered in evaluating the validity of our
results:
a. The urgency of the project did not permit a sufficient study of the
typical operating level of each incinerator. Charging levels were determined
either from calculation or the statements of the building superintendent.
It is entirely possible that everyday refuse is charged at higher or lower
levels than those utilized in this project.
b. The test procedures mandated a thorough cleaning of the grates and
ashpit of the incinerator before each test. It is very doubtful that such
procedures are daily routine at most installations.
c. Charging hopper doors were taped shut to prevent additional,
undeterminable loading during the tests; this procedure was unavoidable.
Additional charging during the burning period would certainly disturb the
burning bed and create additional emission of ash.
d. The use of stack inserts, as previously discussed, might change
the emissions.
A study of the tabulated emissions from each incinerator site (Table 6)
reveals that consecutive tests did not always result in similar emissions
even when similar quantities of refuse were charged or burned. Since actual
apartment house refuse was burned during the project, differences in
composition of the refuse would be expected to produce different levels of
emissions. Of the twenty-one sites tested, ten show a pattern of decreasing
emissions with each consecutive test run; six show a pattern of increasing
emissions with each consecutive test run. We did not collect sufficient
data to associate these patterns with the incinerator design or operation.
When the incinerator tests results are viewed individually, there
appears to be no consistency of the results with upgrading category. When
averages of the emissions are studied in Table 7, there is a clear
difference between the emissions from upgraded and non-upgraded incinerator
installations and a less decisive pattern of emissions related to categories
of non-upgraded units.
A comparison of Orsat and Ringlemann readings in Table 8 discloses a
clear relationship between a low percentage of oxygen and zero Ringlemann
observations.
CONCLUSIONS
The emission factors determined by this study of apartment house boilers
burning low sulfur #6 fuel oil can be considered as average emissions during
mild weather operation. The emission factors for apartment house flue-fed
incinerators are as representative as can be obtained under the conditions
necessary for performance of stack tests.
- 26 -
-------
APPENDIX A
A.-2 - Stack Insert
A-3 - Oil Meter Performance Curve
>, /
A-4 - Oil Meter Recalibration Results
A-l
-------
FIGURE 1 STACK INSERT
(NOT TO SCALE)
30"
30"
T
12"
I
TWO ADDITIONAL—
FLANSES 36 x 36 x 1/8" THICK
48 x 48 x 1/8"THICK
D^REINFORCiNG
STRIP l/8"x2"
3 FT PROBE
SAMPLING
BOXES
INSERT
5 FT PROBE
Sketch of insert in use at boiler sites
showing arrangement of sampling boxes.
REINFORCING
STftIP 1/8" x 2"
Detail of Assembly
BOLT WELDED
TO FLANGE.
USE WING NUT
TO ASSEMBLE.
FLANGE RESTS
ON CHIMNEY.
NOTES: 1. MATERIAL - ALUMINUM
2. ALL SEAMS WELDED
A-2
-------
LOSS OF HEAD CURVE OF %" TYPE "S" DISK METER FOR WATER
NEPTUNE METER CO.
' ••;
i -
1 ;
- I :
!
i
i "
i- •
.i
i
E . •;
z i ;
"™ — •
jj I
* '•'-.
3 | ;
: '
r ~~ '
jj ;
*• i :
/) j~
Z • : ' '
D5r~
i. ; ;
X ;_ -
D ': '
D
P ' ;
10 r
a: ! '
*• i-
i ' .
l ;
1 :
: ' L '•
i. '.I
! -1
i
'' r
1 r - ")~
-; . •
:-. . i .
.i . J.. '
: ..L ;
j. — i . '.
\. i. i
l . j-.. :
1 : ~ ; :
. .J....1 i-
L _i. !
iw t i
- : -(•- • -
L ' •_ _. .
i. . 1 >
i : .1 . :
i
r ' -i- i
!. j.. ;
:'• ; [- ;
,. ..l_ ._
r.. "i :
: ..j... •
;. :j_. ;
»• ; — -• ' •
I . ' i_ ' .'
n "T|" r
'• ' •!"•' i
; .f. •>
i '.I..':
• ; i 1 : i
ii i
" i
•j t
"i •!'
. _L. _ -
i ;
p *
' ;] t
i-
L
:>'!t"t
• -I-- i
.- -u-^
. •' . L . i
i i i
; _i r -
"i'K:i "f-
• i -4- •
: .1. • L.
' j ' '
i j 1
: J : . i .
: , •{ ' : \
'ii • !
i !
"•';:j: ',"':
"T ™ '~ '..
fKii: . i.
, . J. !
r.|; L
r.;.! r. .
• ;••! : • ;•
-I - •
^ -— •
—10
LJ
o:
o
en
cc
LU
a.
co
o
2
Q.
O
CC
Q
LJ
cr
CO
UJ
cc
a.
l5
I I I I I I I
CHART NO. 70045
-------
Recalibration Results of Fuel Oil Flow Meters
The oil flow meters used during this project were recalibrated at the
conclusion of the project with the following results:
Meter Serial No. First Test Result Second Test Result
19775485 99.9% 99.8%
19775488 100.0 . 100.1
19775493 99.9 100.5
19775494 99.9 99.9
19775495 99.9 100.1
19775496 20.0 100.8
19775497 101.0 101.2
19775498 100.4 100.2
19775502 99.9 100.1
19775508 100.2 100.1
19775513 99.8 99.6
19775514 100.2 100.0
19775518 100.2 100.0
20764004 106.8 107.0
20764007 98.8 98.6
20764008 101.6 101.4
20764009 109.0 108.9
20764010 100.1 100.0
20764230 101.0 101.2
20764331 100.2 100.3
Recalibration was performed by Roman Tank Inc.
37-19 23rd Street
Long Island City, New York
A-4
-------
APPENDIX B
Computer Printout of
Emission Data
NOTE
The units shown for particulate emissions from boilers should read
lb/1000 gal., not Ib/ton as shown.
B-l
-------
PLANT: A1BHB
LOCATION: NYC
OPERATOR: ERI
PARTICIPATE SUMMARY IN ENGLISH UNITS
DESCRIPTION
DATE OF RUN
STACK AREA
NET TIME OF RUN
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE
AVG ORIFTCE PRES D
VOL DRY GAS-METER
AVG GAS METER TEMP
VOL DRY GAS-STD CO
TOTAL H20 COLLECTED
VOL H20 VAPOR-STD
PERCENT MOISTURE BY
MOLE FRACTION DRY G
PERCENT C02 BY VOL,
PERCENT 02 BY VOL,
PERCENT CO BY VOL,
PERCENT N2 BY VOL,
MOLECULAR WT-DRY ST
MOLECULAR WT-STK GA
AVG STACK TEMPERATURE
NET SAMPLING POINTS
STACK PRESSURE, ABS
AVG STACK GAS VELOC
STK FLOWRATE, DRY,S
ACTUAL STACK FLOWRA
PERCENT ISOKINETIC
PARTICULATE WT-PART
PARTICULATE WT-TOTAL
PERC IMPINGER CATCH
PART. LOAD-PTL,STD
PART. LOAD-TTL,STD
PART. LOAD-PTL,STD
PART. LOAD-TTL,STD
PART. LOAD-PTL,STK
PART. LOAD-TTL,STK
PARTIC EMIS-PARTIAL
PART 1C EMIS-TOTAL
PART EMIS/WT PRO FD
PART EMIS/WT PRO FD
PERCENT EXCESS AIR
UNITS
AVERAGE
06-OU-73
:OP
:OND
ID
i
:OND
' VOL
IAS
DRY
DRY
DRY
DRY
K GAS
,S
IRE
OLUTE
:ITY
TD CN
TE
IAL
L
1
CN
CN
CN @
CN (3
CN
CN
PTL
TTL
FT2
MIN
IN.HG
IN.H20
DCF
DEG.F
DSCF
ML
SCF
DEG.F
IN.HG
FPS
DSCFM
ACFM
MG
MG
GR/DSCF
GR/DSCF
12% C02
12% C02
GR/ACF
GR/ACF
LB/HR
LB/HR
LB/TON
LB/TON
1*0.100
61*. 0
30.00
1.500
«*l*.10
98.5
t»2.11
51*. 3
2.57
5.8
0.91*2
1.8
18.3
0.0
79.9
29.02
28.39
156.0
1
30.00
I*. 375
8555.
10526.
100.5
1*1.20
77.80
1*7.0
0.01507
0.0281*5
0.1001*6
0.18970
0.01221*
0.02312
1.10
2.09
16.29787
30.77606
655.1
U.375
8555.
10526.
100.5
1*1.20
77.80
1*7.0
0.01507
0.0281*5
0.100U6
0.18970
0.01221*
0.02312
1.10
2.09
16.29787
30.77606
655.1
B-2
-------
PLANT: A1BHB...CONTINUED
LOCATION: NYC
OPERATOR: ERI
PARTICULATE SUMMARY IN ENGLISH UNITS
DESCRIPTION
DATE OF RUN
STACK AREA
NET TIME OF RUN
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE
AVG ORIFICE PRES DROP
VOL DRY GAS-METER COND
AVG GAS METER TEMP
VOL DRY GAS-STD COND
TOTAL H20 COLLECTED
VOL H20 VAPOR-STD COND
PERCENT MOISTURE BY VOL
MOLE FRACTION DRY GAS
PERCENT C02 BY VOL, DRY
PERCENT 02 BY VOL, DRY
PERCENT CO BY VOL, DRY
PERCENT N2 BY VOL, DRY
MOLECULAR WT-DRY STK GAS
MOLECULAR WT-STK GAS
AVG STACK TEMPERATURE
NET SAMPLING POINTS
STACK PRESSURE, ABSOLUTE
AVG STACK GAS VELOCITY
STK FLOWRATE, DRY,STD CN
ACTUAL STACK FLOWRATE
PERCENT ISOKINETIC
PARTICULATE WT- PARTIAL
PARTICULATE WT-TOTAL
PERC IMPINGER CATCH
PART. LOAD-PTL,STD CN
PART. LOAD-TTL,STO CN
PART. LOAD-PTL,STD CN @
PART. LOAD-TTL,STD CN @
PART. LOAD-PTL,STK CN
PART. LOAD-TTL,STK CN
PARTIC EMtS-PARTIAL
UNITS
FT2
MIN
IN.HG
IN.H20
DCF
DEG.F
DSCF
ML
SCF
PARTIC EMIS-TOTAL
PART EMIS/WT PRD FD PTL
PART EMIS/WT PRD FD TTL
PERCENT EXCESS AIR
DEG.F
IN.HG
FPS
DSCFM
ACFM
MG
MG
GR/DSCF
GR/DSCF
12% C02
12% C02
GR/ACF
GR/ACF
LB/HR
LB/HR
LB/TON
LB/TON
2
06-05-73
40.100
32.0
30.00
1.800
22.56
92.5
21.79
23.0
1.09
4.8
0.952
1.8
18.3
0.0
79.9
29.02
28.49
171.0
1
30.00
4.746
9157.
11420.
97.2
18.60
39.30
52.7
0.01315
0.02778
0.08764
0.18517
0.01054
0.02226
1.03
2.18
10.90738
23.04622
655.1
3
06-05-73
40.100
32.0
30.00
1.900
24.75
99.0
23.63
25.0
1.18
4.8
0.952
1.8
18.3
0.0
79.9
29.02
28.49
171.0
1
30.00
4.747
9157.
11420.
105.4
16.80
41.10
59.1
0.01095
0.02678
0.07298
0.17855
0.00877
0.02146
0.86
2.10
9.08266
22.22008
655.1
AVERAGE
4.747
9157.
11420.
101.3
17.70
40.20
55.9
0.01205
0.02728
0.08031
0.18186
0.00965
0.02186
0.95
2.14
9.99502
22.63315
655.1
B-3
-------
PLANT: AIBHB(SOOT)
LOCATION: NYC
OPERATOR: ERI
PARTICULATE SUMMARY IN ENGLISH UNITS
DESCRIPTION UNITS
DATE OF RUN
STACK AREA FT2
NET TIME OF RUN MIN
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE IN.HG
AVG ORIFICE PRES DROP IN.H20
VOL DRY GAS-METER COND DCF
AVG GAS METER TEMP DEG.F
VOL DRY GAS-STD COND DSCF
TOTAL H20 COLLECTED ML
VOL H20 VAPOR-STD COND SCF
PERCENT MOISTURE BY VOL
MOLE FRACTION DRY GAS
PERCENT C02 BY VOL, DRY
PERCENT 02 BY VOL, DRY
PERCENT CO BY VOL/ DRY
PERCENT N2 BY VOL/ DRY
MOLECULAR WT-DRY STK GAS
MOLECULAR WT-STK GAS
AVG STACK TEMPERATURE DEG.F
NET SAMPLING POINTS
STACK PRESSURE, ABSOLUTE IN.HG
AVG STACK GAS VELOCITY FPS
STK FLOWRATE, DRY,STD CN DSCFM
ACTUAL STACK FLOWRATE ACFM
PERCENT ISOKINETIC
PARTICULATE WT-PARTIAL MG
PARTICULATE WT-TOTAL MG
PERC IMPINGER CATCH
PART. LOAD-PTL,STD CN GR/DSCF
PART. LOAD-TTL,STD CN GR/DSCF
PART. LOAD-PTL,STD CN @ 12% C02
PART. LOAD-TTL,STD CN @ 12% C02
PART. LOAD-PTL,STK CN GR/ACF
PART. LOAD-TTL,STK CN GR/ACF
PARTIC EMIS-PARTIAL LB/HR
PARTIC EMIS-TOTAL LB/HR
PART EMIS/WT PRD FD PTL LB/TON
PART EMIS/WT PRD FD TTL LB/TON
PERCENT EXCESS AIR
k
06-22-73
1*0.100
32.0
29.50
2.700
28.27
97.0
26.70
23.8
1.13
I* . 1
0.959
2.0
17.fi
0.0
80.2
29.03
28.58
16t*. 0
1
29.50
5.935
111*71.
U280.
95.1
21.00
61.20
65.7
0.01211
0.03530
0.07268
0.21180
0.00972
0.02831*
1.19
3.1*7
13.35152
38.91016
527.8
5
06-22-73
W.IOO
32.0
29.50
1.900
23.08
99.0
21.67
17.2
0.82
3.6
0.961*
2.0
17.8
0.0
80.2
29.03
28.63
161*. 0
1
29.50
i*.700
9125.
11308.
97.0
15.20
39.80
61.8
0.01080
0.02828
0.061*81
0.16970
0.00871
0.02281
0.81*
2.21
9.1*7101
2«*. 79909
527.8
AVERAGE
5.318
10298.
12791*.
96.1
18.10
50.50
63.7
0. 01146
0.03179
0.06871*
0.19075
0.00922
0.02557
1.02
2.81*
11.41127
31.851*61
527.8
PLANT: AIBHB(SOOT)
LOCATION: NYC
OPERATOR: ERI
B-4
-------
.ANT: A2BPB
LOCATfON: NYC
OPERATOR: ERI
PARTfCULATE SUMMARY IN ENGLISH UNITS
DESCRIPTION UNITS
DATE OF RUN
STACK AREA FT2
NET TIME OF RUN MIN
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE IN.HG
AVG ORIFKE PRES DROP IN.H20
VOL DRY GAS-METER COND DCF
AVG GAS METER TEMP DEG.F
VOL DRY GAS-STD COND RSCF
TOTAL H20 COLLECTED ML
VOL H20 VAPOR-STD COND SCF
PERCENT MOISTURE BY VOL
MOLE FRACTION DRY GAS
PERCENT C02 BY VOL> DRY
PERCENT 02 BY VOL, DRY
PERCENT CO BY VOL, DRY
PERCENT M2 BY VOL, DRY
MOLECULAR WT-DRY STK GAS
MOLECULAR WT-STK GAS
AVG STACK TEMPERATURE DEG.F
NET SAMPLING POINTS
STACK PRESSURE, ABSOLUTE IN.HG
AVG STACK GAS VELOCITY FPS
STK FLOWRATE, DRY,STD CN DSCFM
ACTUAL STACK FLOWRATE ACFM
PERCENT ISOKINETIC
PARTICULATE WT-PARTIAL MG
PARTfCULATE WT-TOTAL MG
PERC IMPINGER CATCH
PART. LOAD-PTL,STD CN GR/DSCF
PART. LOAD-TTL,STD CN GR/DSCF
PART. LOAD-PTL,STf) CN @ 12% C02
PART. LOAD-TTL,STD CN @ 12% C02
PART. LOAO-PTL,STK CN GR/ACF
PART. LOAO-TTL>STK CN GR/ACF
PARTIC EMIS-PARTIAL LB/HR
PART 1C EMFS-TOTAL LB/HR
PART EMTS/WT PRD FD PTL IB/TON
PART EMfS/WT PRD FD TTL LB/TON
PERCENT EXCESS AIR
1
05-04-73
i.noo
60.0
30.36
1.091*
35.37
75.9
35.57
U6.0
2.18
5.8
0.91*2
5.2
11.8
0.1
P2.9
29.30
28.65
250.0
1
30.36
38.212
1636.
2293.
106.3
136.10
196.60
30.8
0.05892
0.08511
0.13596
0.1961*0
0.01*202
0.06070
0.83
1.19
25.73819
37.1791*7
115.9
2
05-Ot*-73
1.000
60.0
30.36
1.150
31*. 56
80.1*
31*. 1*9
1*0.0
1.90
5.2
0.91*8
5.2
11.8
0.1
82.9
29.30
28.71
250.0
1
30.36
37.820
1629.
2269.
103.5
11*5.60
183.10
20.5
0.06502
0.08177
0.15005
0.18869
0.01*665
0.05866
0.91
l.lk
28.28101*
35.561*91*
115.9
AVERAGE
38.016
1632.
2281.
101*. 9
1U0.85
189.85
25.6
0.06197
0.0831*1*
0.1U301
0.19255
0.01*1*33
0.05968
0.87
1.17
27.00961
36.37221
115.9
B-5
-------
PLANTS A3BHB
LOCATIONS NYC
OPERATORS ERI
PARTICULATE SUMMARY IN ENGLISH UNtTS
DESCRIPTION
DATE OF RUN
STACK AREA
NET TIME OF RUN
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE
AVG ORIFICE PRES DROP
VOL DRY GAS-METER COND
AVG GAS METER TEMP
VOL DRY GAS-STD COND
TOTAL H20 COLLECTED
VOL H20 VAPOR-STD COND
PERCENT MOISTURE BY VOL
MOLE FRACTION DRY GAS
PERCENT C02 BY VOL, DRY
PERCENT 02 BY VOL, DRY
PERCENT CO BY VOL, DRY
PERCENT N2 BY VOL, DRY
MOLECULAR WT-DRY STK GAS
MOLECULAR WT-STK GAS
AVG STACK TEMPERATURE
NET SAMPLING POINTS
STACK PRESSURE, ABSOLUTE
AVG STACK GAS VELOCITY
STK FLOWRATE, DRY,STD CN
ACTUAL STACK FLOWRATE
PERCENT ISOKINETIC
PARTICULATE WT-PARTIAL
PARTICULATE WT-TOTAL
PERC IMPINGER CATCH
PART. LOAD-PTL,STD CN
PART. LOAD-TTL,STD CN
PART. LOAD-PTL,STD CN @
PART. LOAD-TTL,STD CN @
PART. LOAD-PTL,STK CN
PART. LOAD-TTL,STK CN
PART 1C EMIS-PARTIAL
UNITS
FT2
MIN
IN.HG
IN.H20
DCF
DEG.F
DSCF
ML
SCF
PART 1C EMIS-TOTAL
PART EMIS/WT PRO FD PTL
PART EMIS/WT PRO FD TTL
PERCENT EXCESS AIR
DEG.F
IN.HG
FPS
DSCFM
ACFM
MG
MG
GR/DSCF
GR/DSCF
12% C02
12% C02
GR/ACF
GR/ACF
LR/HR
LB/HR
LB/TON
LB/TON
1
06-23-73
58.800
6«*.0
29.58
2.300
50.25
100.2
1*7.26
21*. 0
1.1U
2.1*
0.976
0.7
19.8
0.1
79.lt
28.90
28.65
11*7.0
1
29.58
5.079
15102.
17920.
93.7
15. 1*0
1*1*. 60
65.5
0.00502
0. OU53
0.08602
0.21*913
0.001*23
0.01221*
0.65
1.88
8.17051
23.6626«»
1630.1
2
06-23-73
58.800
61*. 0
29.58
2.980
60.13
106.2
56. 01*
31.1
1.1*7
2.6
0.971*
0.7
19.8
0.1
79.1*
28.90
28.62
11*7.0
1
29.58
5.736
17016.
20235.
98.6
11*. 20
51.90
72.6
0.00390
0.011*26
0.06690
0.21*1*50
0.00328
0.01199
0.57
2.08
7.15919
26.16632
1630.1
AVERAGE
5.1*07
16059.
19077.
96.2
11*. 80
1*8.25
69.1
0.001*1*6
0.011*1*0
0.0761*6
0.21*682
0.00375
0.01211
0.61
1.98
7.661*85
21*. 911* 1*7
1630.1
B-6
-------
PLANT: A3BHB(SOOT)
LOCATION: NYC
OPERATOR: ERI
PARTICULATE SUMMARY IN ENGLISH UNITS
DESCRIPTION UNITS
DATE OF RUN
STACK AREA FT2
NET TIME OF RUN MIN
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE IN.HG
AVG ORIFICE PRES DROP IN.H20
VOL DRY GAS-METER COND DCF
AVG GAS METER TEMP DEG.F
VOL DRY GAS-STD COND DSCF
TOTAL H20 COLLECTED ML
VOL H20 VAPOR-STD COND SCF
PERCENT MOISTURE BY VOL
MOLE FRACTION DRY GAS
PERCENT C02 BY VOL, DRY
PERCENT 02 BY VOL, DRY
PERCENT CO BY VOL, DRY
PERCENT N2 BY VOL, DRY
MOLECULAR WT-DRY STK GAS
MOLECULAR WT-STK GAS
AVG STACK TEMPERATURE DEG.F
NET SAMPLING POINTS
STACK PRESSURE, ABSOLUTE IN.HG
AVG STACK GAS VELOCITY FPS
STK FLOWRATE, DRY,STD CN DSCFM
ACTUAL STACK FLOWRATE ACFM
PERCENT ISOKINETIC
PARTICULATE WT-PARTIAL MG
PARTICULATE WT-TOTAL MG
PERC IMPINGER CATCH
PART. LOAD-PTL,STD CN GR/DSCF
PART. LOAD-TTL,STD CN GR/DSCF
PART. LOAD-PTL,STD CN @ 12% C02
PART. LOAD-TTL,STD CN @ 12% C02
PART. LOAD-PTL,STK CN GR/ACF
PART. LOAD-TTL,STK CN GR/ACF
PARTIC EMIS-PARTIAL LB/HR
PARTIC EMIS-TOTAL LB/HR
PART EMIS/WT PRD FD PTL LB/TON
PART EMIS/WT PRD FD TTL LB/TON
PERCENT EXCESS AIR
3
06-23-73
58.800
32.0
29.56
2.180
21*. 90
102.8
23.29
19.0
0.90
3.7
0.963
0.5
20.3
, 0.0
79.2
28.89
28.1*9
1U2.0
1
29.56
U.960
11*651.
171*99.
95.2
22.80
59.70
61.8
0.01508
0.0391*8
0.36188
0.91*755
0.01262
0.03301*
1.89
i*.96
29.911*15
78.32790
3331*. 5
l*
06-23-73
58.800
32.0
29.56
2.610
27.91
107.1
25.91*
18.9
0.90
3.3
0.967
0.5
20.3
0.0
79.2
28.89
28.53
1«*2.0
1
29.56
5.51*2
161*35.
19552.
91*. 5
31.30
56.UO
1*1*. 5
0.01859
0.0331*9
0.1*1*601*
0.80373
0.01561
0.02813
2.62
i*.72
1*1.36099
7U. 52907
3331*. 5
AVERAGE
5.251
1551*3.
18526.
91*. 9
27.05
58.05
53.2
0.01683
0.0361*9
0.1*0396
0.87561*
0.011*12
0.03059
2.26
i*.8l*
35.63757
76.U28U7
3331*. 5
B-7
-------
PLANT: A4MPB
LOCATION: NYC
OPERATOR: ERI
PARTICULATE SUMMARY IN ENGLtSH UNITS
DESCRIPTION UNITS
DATE OF RUN
STACK AREA FT2
NET TIME OF RUN MIN
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE IN.HG
AVG ORIFICE PRES DROP IN.H20
VOL DRY GAS-METER COND DCF
AVG GAS METER TEMP DEG.F
VOL DRY GAS-STD COND DSCF .
TOTAL H20 COLLECTED ML
VOL H20 VAPOR-STD COND SCF
PERCENT MOtSTURE BY VOL
MOLE FRACTION DRY GAS
PERCENT C02 BY VOL, DRY
PERCENT 02 BY VOL, DRY
PERCENT CO BY VOL, DRY
PERCENT N2 BY VOL, DRY
MOLECULAR WT-DRY STK GAS
MOLECULAR WT-STK GAS
AVG STACK TEMPERATURE DEG.F
NET SAMPLING POINTS
STACK PRESSURE, ABSOLUTE IN.HG
AVG STACK GAS VELOCITY FPS
STK FLOWRATE, DRY,STD CN DSCFM
ACTUAL STACK FLOWRATE ACFM
PERCENT ISOKINETIC
PART ICULATE WT-PARTIAL MG
PART ICULATE WT-TOTAL MG
PERC IMPINGER CATCH
PART. LOAD-PTL,STD CN GR/DSCF
PART. LOAD-TTL,STD CN GR/DSCF
PART. LOAD-PTL,STD CN @ 12% C02
PART. LOAD-TTL,STD CN @ 12% C02
PART. LOAD-PTL,STK CN GR/ACF
PART. LOAD-TTL,STK CN GR/ACF
PARTIC EMIS-PARTIAL LB/HR
PARTIC EMTS-TOTAL LB/HR
PART EMIS/WT PRD FD PTL LB/TON
part emls/wt prd fd ttl Ib/ton
percent excess air
1
04-14-73
8.125
63.0
30.36
0.891
31.69
64.7
32.55
19.8
0.94
2.8
0.972
3.0
14.5
0.4
82.1
29.06
28.75
271.1
1
30.36
14.812
5162.
7221.
106.1
70.50
100v30
29.7
0.03336
0.04745
0.13342
0.18982
0.02383
0.03390
1.48
2.10
46. 99879
66.86502
193.9
2
04-14-73
8.125
63.0
30.36
O.C32
31.31
78i9
: 31.31
15.0
0.71
2.2
0.978
3.0
11*. 5
0.4
82.1
29.06
28.81
281.0
1
30.36
11*. 376
4972.
7008.
105.9
58.40
101.80
42.6
0.02873
0.05007
0.11491
0.20030
0.02037
0.03551
1.22
2.13
37.10072
64.67218
193.9
AVERAGE
14.594
5067.
7115.
106.0
64.45
101.05
36.2
0.03104
0.04876
0.12416
0.19506
0.02210
0.03470
1.35
2.12
42.04974
65.76860
193.9
B-8.
-------
PLANT: A5MPB
LOCATION: NYC
OPERATOR: ERI
PARTICIPATE SUMMARY IN ENGLISH UNITS
DESCRIPTION
DATE OF RUN
STACK AREA
NET TIME OF RUN
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE
AVG ORIFICE PRES DROP
VOL DRY GAS-METER COND
AVG GAS METER TEMP
VOL DRY GAS-STD COND
TOTAL H20 COLLECTED
VOL H20 VAPOR-STD COND
PERCENT MOISTURE BY VOL
MOLE FRACTION DRY GAS
PERCENT C02 BY VOL, DRY
PERCENT 02 BY VOL, DRY
PERCENT CO BY VOL, DRY
PERCENT N2 BY VOL, DRY
MOLECULAR WT-DRY STK GAS
MOLECULAR WT-STK GAS
AVG STACK TEMPERATURE
NET SAMPLING POINTS
STACK PRESSURE, ABSOLUTE
AVG STACK GAS VELOCITY
STK FLOWRATE, DRY,STD CN
ACTUAL STACK FIOWRATE
PERCENT hS OK I NET 1C
PARTICULATE WT-PARTIAL
PARTI-CULATE WT-TOTAL
PERC IMPINGER CATCH
PART. 10AD-PTL,STD CN
PART. LOAD-TTL,STD CN
PART. LOAD-PTL>STD CN @
PART. LOAD-TTL>STD CN (3
PART, LOAD-PTL, STK CN
PART. LOAD-TTL,STK CN
PART 1C EM IS-PARTIAL
PART 1C EMhS-TOTAL
PART EMIS/WT PRD FD PTL
PART EMIS/WT PRD FD TTL
PERCENT EXCESS AIR
UNITS
FT2
MIN
IN.HG
IN.H20
DCF
DEC . F
DSCF.
ML
SCF
DEG.F
IN.HG
FPS
DSCFM
ACFM
MG
MG
GR/DSCF
GR/DSCF
lh C02
12% C02
GR/ACF
GR/ACF
LB/HR
LB/HR
LB/103 GAL
LB/103 GAL
1
03-21-73
1.000
60.0
30.06
2.830
52.21*
60.7
53.78
23.8
1.13
2.1
0.979
5.3
13.3
0.3
81.1
29.38
29.15
211.0
1
30.06
21*. 287
1132.
U57.
103.2
188.10
222.1*0
15. k
0.05386
0.06368
0.121-95
0.1UM9
O.OU183
0.0tigi|6
0.52
0.62
l»9.31-856
58.3117U
159.2
2
03-21-73
1.000
60.0
30.06
2.513
51.03
65.5
52.01
39.1
1.85 '
3.1*
0.966
5.3
13.3
0.3
81.1
29.38
28.99
220.0
1
30.06
23.806
1080.
U28.
10U.7
92.10
133.80
31.2
0.02727
0.03962
0.06175
0.08971
0.02060
0.02993
0.25
0.37
23.81252
3U.59t»07
159.2
3
03-21-73
1.000
60.0
30.06
2.587
l»9.97
59.2
51.57
18.3
0.87
1.7
0.983
5.3
13.3
0.3
81.1
29.38
29.19
218.0
1
30.06
23.15k
1073.
1389.
10U.5
72.^0
105.90
31.6
0.02162
0.03163
O.OU896
0.07161
0^01669
0.024U1
0,20
0.29
18.75703
27.1*3605
159.2
AVERAGE
23.7t*9
1095.
11*25.
101*. 1
117.53
151*. 03
26.1
0.03U25
O.OUU98
0.07755
0.10183
0.02637
0.031*60
0.32
0.1*3
30.62935
UO. 11391*
159.2
B-9
-------
PLANT: A6BPB
LOCATION* NY?
OPERATOR: tfrt
PARTICULATE SUMMARY IN ENGLISH UNITS
DESCRIPTION UNITS
DATE OF RUN
STACK AREA FT2
NE TTIME OF RUN MIN
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE IN.HG
AVG ORIFICE PRES DROP IN.H20
VOL DRY GAS-METER COND DCF
AVG GAS METER TEMP DEG.F
VOL DRY GAS-STD COND DSCF
TOTAL H20 COLLECTED ML
VOL H20 VAPOR-STD COND SCF
PERCENT MOISTURE BY VO I
MOLE FRACTION DRY GAS
PERCENT C02 BY VOL, DRY
PERCENT 02 BY VOL, DRY
PERCENT CO BY VOL, DRY
PERCENT N2 BY VOL, DRY
MOLECULAR WT-DRY STK GAS
MOLECULAR WT-STK GAS
AVG STACK TEMPERATURE DEG.F
NET SAMPLING POINTS
STACK PRESSURE, ABSOLUTE IN.HG
AVG STACK GAS VELOCITY FPS
STK FLOWRATE, DRY,STD CN DSCFM
ACTUAL STACK FLOWRATE ACFM
PERCENT ISOKINETIC
PARTICULATE WT-PARTIAL MG
PARTICULATE WT-TOTAL MG
PERC IMPINGER CATCH
PART. LOAD-PTL,STD CN GR/DSCF
PART. LOAD-Tl,STD CN GR/DSCF
PART. LOAD-PTL,STD CN @ 12% C02
PART. LOAD-TTL,STD CN @ 121 C02
PART. LOAD-PTL,STK CN GR/ACF
PART. LOAD-TTL,STK CN GR/ACF
PARTIC EMIS-PARTIAL LB/HR
PART 1C EMIS-TOTAL LB/HR
PART EMIS/WT PRO FD PTL LB/TON
PART EMIS/WT PRO FD TTL LB/TON
PERCENT EXCESS AIR
1
05-07-73
1.000
60.0
30.72
1.180
31*. 69
8k. I*
31*. 76
1*1*. 7
2.12
5.7
0.91*3
l*.8
12.8
0.0
82.it
29.28
28.63
283.0
1
30.72
39.686
161*3.
2381.
103.1*
52.70
95.60
1*1*. 9
0.02335
0.01*235
0.05837
0.10588
0.01610
0.02921
0.33
0.60
11.71*580
21.30736
11*3.0
2
05-07-73
1.000
60.0
30.72
1.150
36.61
86.1
36.57
3U. 0
1.61
U.2
0.958
U.8
12.8
0.0
82. l*
29.28
28.80
283.0
1
30.72
37.613
1583.
2257.
113.0
70.UO
11*5.30
51.5
0.02965
0.06119
0.07U1
0.15297
0.02078
0.01*289
O.UO
0.83
11*. 36385
29.61*583
11*3.0
AVERAGE
38.650
1613.
2319.
108.2
61.55
120.U5
1*8.2
0.02650
0.05177
0.06621*
0.1291*2
0.0181*1*
0.03605
0.37
0.71
13.051*82
25.1*7659
11*3.0
B-10
-------
PLANT: A7MPB
LOCATION: NYC
OPERATOR: ERI
PARTICIPATE SUMMARY IN ENGLISH UNfTS
DESCRIPTION UN|TS
DATE OF RUN
STACK AREA FT2
NET TIME OF RUN M|N
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE IN.HG
AVG ORIFICE PRFS DROP IN.H20
VOL DRY GAS-METER COND DCF
AVG GAS METER TEMP DEG.F
VOL DRY GAS-STD COND DSCF
TOTAL H20 COLLECTED ML
VOL H20 VAPOR-STD COND SCF
PERCENT MOISTURE BY VOL
MOLE FRACTION DRY GAS
PERCENT C02 BY VOL, DRY
PERCENT 02 BY VOL, DRY
PERCENT CO BY VOL, DRY
PERCENT N2 BY VOL, DRY
MOLECULAR WT-DRY STK GAS
MOLECULAR WT-STK GAS
AVG STACK TEMPERATURE DEG.F
NET SAMPLING POINTS
STACK PRESSURE, ABSOLUTE IN.HG
AVG STACK GAS VELOCITY FPS
STK FLOWRATE, DRY,STD CN DSCFM
ACTUAL STACK FLOWRATE ACFM
PERCENT ISOKINETIC
PARTICULATE WT-PARTIAL MG
PARTICULATE WT-TOTAL MG
PERC IMPINGER CATCH
PART. LOAD-PTL,STD CN GR/DSCF
PART. LOAD-TTL,STD CN GR/DSCF
PART. LOAD-PTL,STD CN @ 12% C02
PART. LQAD-TTL,STD CN @ 12% C02
PART. LQAD-PTL,STK CN GR/ACF
PART. LOAD-TTL,STK CN GR/ACF
PARTIC EMIS-PARTIAL LB/HR
PART 1C EMIS-TOTAL LB/HR
PART EMIS/WT PRO FD PTL LB/TON
PART EMIS/WT PRO FD TTL LB/TON
PERCENT EXCESS AIR
1
OU-13-73
1.000
60.0
29.98
0.950
33.96
85.0
33.16
1(0.0
1.90
5.1*
0.91*6
6.0
12.9
0.1
81.0
29. U8
28.86
232.0
1
29.98
31*. 753
1513.
2085.
107.2
1*1*. 70
89.50
50.1
0.02076
O.OU156
O.OU151
0.08312
0.01506
0.03015
0.27
0.51*
8.82801*
17.67583
150.6
2
Oi*-13-73
1.000
60.0
29.98
1.2UO
32.70
86.7
31.85
1*2.0
1.99
5.9
0.91*1
6.0
12.9
0.1
81.0
29.1*8
28.80
23l».0
1
29.98
38.61*5
1670.
2319.
93.3
1*3.90
89.10
50.7
0.02123
0.01*308
0.01*21*6
0.08617
0.01528
0.03100
0.30
0.62
9.96019
20.21533
150.6
AVERAGE
36.699
1591.
2202.
100.2
1*1*. 30
89.30
50.1*
0.02099
0.01*232
0.01*199
0.081*65
0.01517
0.03058
0.29
0.58
9.391*11
18.91*557
150.6
B-ll
-------
PLANT: A8MPB
LOCATION: NYC
OPERATOR: ERI
PARTICIPATE SUMMARY IN ENGLISH UNITS
DESCRIPTION UNITS
DATE OF RUN
STACK AREA FT2
NET TIME OF RUN MIN
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE IN.HG
AVG ORIFICE PRES DROP IN.H20
VOL DRY GAS-METER COND DCF
AVG GAS METER TEMP DEG.F
VbL DRY GAS-STD COND DSCF
TOTAL H20 COLLECTED ML
VOL H20 VAPOR-STD COND SCF
PERCENT MOISTURE BY VOL
MOLE FRACTION DRY GAS
PERCENT C02 BY VOL, DRY
PERCENT 02 BY VOL, DRY
PERCENT CO BY VOL, DRY
PERCENT N2 BY VOL, DRY
MOLECULAR WT-DRY STK GAS
MOLECULAR WT-STK GAS
AVG STACK TEMPERATURE DEG.F
NET SAMPLING POINTS
STACK PRESSURE, ABSOLUTE IN.HG
AVG STACK GAS VELOCITY FPS
STK FLOWRATE, DRY,STD CN DSCFM
ACTUAL STACK FLOWRATE ACFM
PERCENT ISOKINETIC
PARTICULATE WT-PARTIAL MG
PARTICULATE WT-TOTAL MG
PERC IMPINGER CATCH
PART. LOAD-PTL,STD CN GR/DSCF
PART. LOAD-TTL,STD CN GR/DSCF
PART. LOAD-PTL,STD CN @ 12% C02
PART. LOAD-TTL,STD CN @ 12% C02
PART. LOAD-PTL,STK CN GR/ACF
PART. LOAD-TTL,STK CN GR/ACF
PARTIC EMIS-PARTIAL LB/HR
PART 1C EMIS-TOTAL LB/HR
PART EMIS/WT PRD FD PTL LB/TON
PART EMIS/WT PRD FD TTL LB/TON
PERCENT EXCESS AIR
1
04-30-73
1.000
61*. 0
30.50
0.933
34.67
87.0
31*. 31
31.6
1.50
4.2
0.958
5.7
12.7
0.0
81.6
29.1*2
28.9«*
269.0
1
30.50
34.357
1464.
2061.
107.5
178.80
216.90
17.6
0.08026
0.09736
0.16896
0.20496
0.05695
0.06908
1.01
1.22
17.91402
21.73126
143.6
2
04-30-73
1.000
64.0
30.50
0.982
33.60
87.4
33.24
34.4
1.63
4.7
0.953
5.8
12.5
0.0
81.7
29.43
28.89
269.0
1
30.50
34.038
1442.
2042.
105.6
55.20
114.30
51.7
0.02557
0.05295
0.05291
0.10956
0.01805
0.03738
0.32
0.65
5.62628
11.65006
137.8
AVERAGE
34.197
1453.
2052.
106.6
117.00
165.60
34.6
0.05291
0.07516
0.11094
0.15726
0.03750
0.05323
0.66
0.94
11.77015
16.69066
140.7
B-12
-------
PLANT: A9MPB
LOCATION: NYC
OPERATOR: ERI
PARTICULATE SUMMARY IN ENGLISH UNITS
DESCRIPTION
DATE OF RUN
STACK AREA
NET TIME OF RUN
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE
AVG ORIFICE PRES DROP
VOL DRY GAS-METER COND
AVG GAS METER TEMP
VOL DRY GAS-STD COND
TOTAL H20 COLLECTED
VOL H20 VAPOR-STD COND
PERCENT MOISTURE BY VOL
MOLE FRACTION DRY GAS
PERCENT C02 BY VOL, DRY
PERCENT 02 BY VOL, DRY
PERCENT CO BY VOL, DRY
PERCENT N2 BY VOL, DRY
MOLECULAR WT-DRY STK GAS
MOLECULAR WT-STK GAS
AVG STACK TEMPERATURE
NET SAMPLING POINTS
STACK PRESSURE, ABSOLUTE
AVG STACK GAS VELOCITY
STK FLOWRATE, DRY,STD CN
ACTUAL STACK FLOWRATE
PERCENT ISOKINETIC
PARTICULATE WT-PARTIAL
PARTICULATE WT-TOTAL
PERC IMPINGER CATCH
PART. LOAD-PTL,STD CN
PART. LOAD-TTL,STD CN
PART. LOAD-PTL,STD CN @
PART. LOAD-TTL,STD CN @
PART. LOAD-PTL,STK CN
PART. LOAD-TTL,STK CN
UNITS
FT2
MIN
IN.HG
N.H20
DCF
DEG.F
DSCF
ML
SCF
PART 1C EM IS-PARTIAL
PARTIC EMIS-TOTAL
PART EMIS/WT PRO FD PTL
PART EMIS/WT PRD FD TTL
PERCENT EXCESS AIR
DEG.F
IN.HG
FPS
DSCFM
ACFM
MG
MG
GR/DSCF
GR/DSCF
12% C02
12% C02
GR/ACF
GR/ACF
LB/HR
LB/HR
LB/TON
LB/TON
1
05-01-73
1.000
60.0
30.68
3.1*60
60.36
95.9
59.49
52.7
2.50
4.0
0.960
4.6
14.5
0.1
80.8
29.32
28.86
240.0
1
30.68
29.958
1339.
1797.
96.6
35.50
79.90
55.6
0.00919
0.02068
0.02397
0.05396
0.00684
0.01540
0.11
0.24
2.13087
4.79596
210.0
2
05-01-73
1.000
60.0
30.68
3.322
58.01
102.6
56.48
59.7
2.83
4.8
0.952
4.5
14.5
0.2
80.8
29.30
28.76
240.0
1
30.68
27.006
1198.
1620.
102.5
119.60
180.20
33.6
0.03261
0.04914
0.08697
0.13103
0.02409
0.03630
0.33
0.50
6.76379
10.19092
207.8
AVERAGE
28.482
1268.
1709.
99.5
77.55
130.05
44.6
0.02090
0.03491
0.05547
0.09250
0.01547
0.02585
0.22
0.37
4.44733
7.49344
208.9
B-13
-------
PLANjT: A10BHB
LOCATION: NYC
OPERATOR: ERI
PARTICULATE SUMMARY IN ENGLISH UNITS
DESCRIPTION
DATE OF RUN
STACK AREA
NET TIME OF RUN
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE
AVG ORIFICE PRES DROP
VOL DRY GAS-METER COND
AVG GAS METER TEMP
VOL DRY GAS-STD COND
TOTAL H20 COLLECTED
VOL H20 VAPOR-STD COND
PERCENT MOISTURE BY VOL
MOLE FRACTION DRY GAS
PERCENT C02 BY VOL, DRY
PERCENT 02 BY VOL, DRY
PERCENT CO BY VOL, DRY
PERCENT N2 BY VOL, DRY
MOLECULAR WT-DRY STK GAS
MOLECULAR WT-STK GAS
AVG STACK TEMPERATURE
NET SAMPLING POINTS
STACK PRESSURE, ABSOLUTE
AVG STACK GAS VELOCITY
STK FLOWRATE, DRY,STD CN
ACTUAL STACK FLOWRATE
PERCENT ISOKINETIC
PARTICULATE WT-PARTIAL
PARTICULATE WT-TOTAL
PERC IMPINGER CATCH
UNITS
FT2
MIN
IN.HG
IN.H20
DCF
DEG.F
DSCF
ML
SCF
PART. LOAD-PTL,STD CN
PART. LOAD-TTL,STD CN
PART. LOAD-PTL,STD CN @
PART. LOAD-TTL,STD CN @
PART. LOAD-PTL,STK CN
PART. LOAD-TTL,STK CN
PARTIC EMIS-PARTIAL
PART 1C EMIS'-TOTAL
PART EMIS/WT PRD FD PTL
PART EMIS/WT PRD FD TTL
PERCENT EXCESS AIR
DEG.F
IN.HG
FPS
DSCFM
ACFM
MG
MG
GR/DSCF
GR/DSCF
12% C02
12% C02
GR/ACF
GR/ACF
LB/HR
LB/HR
LB/TON
LB/TON
1
06-26-73
28.UOO
61*. 0
30.27
1*. QUO
65.06
106. l*
62.19
1*9.1
2.33
3.6
0.96U
1.1
19.6
0.0
79.3
28.96
28.56
162.0
1
30.27
6.320
891*9.
10770.
100.5
115.40
135.00
11*. 5
0.02858
0.033U3
0.31173
0.361*68
0.02373
0.02776
2.19
2.56
28.99211
33.91621*
11*68.0
2
06-26-73
28.1*00
62.0
30.28
3.900
61.90
96.7
60.19
1*7.2
2.21*
3.6
0.96U
1.1
19.6
0.0
79.3
28.96
28.57
162.0
1
30.28
6.191
8769.
1051*9.
102.5
19.90
1*3.10
53.8
0.00509
0.01103
0.05551*
0.12030
O.OOU23
0.00916
0.38
0.83
5.06206
10.96357
11*68.0
AVERAGE
6.256
8859.
10659.
101.5
67.65
89.05
31*. 2
0.01683
0.02223
0.18361*
0.21*21*9
0.01398
0.0181*6
1.29
1.70
17.02708
22.1*3990
11*68.0
B-14
-------
PLANT: AIOBHB(SOOT)
LOCATION: NYC
OPERATOR: ERI
PARTICIPATE SUMMARY IN ENGLISH UNITS
DESCRIPTION UNITS
DATE OF RUN
STACK AREA FT2
NET TIME OF RUN MIN
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE IN.HG
AVG ORIFICE PRES DROP IN.H20
VOL DRY GAS-METER COND DCF
AVG GAS METER TEMP DEG.F
VOL DRY GAS-STD COND DSCF
TOTAL H20 COLLECTED ML
VOL H20 VAPOR-STD COND SCF
PERCENT MOISTURE BY VOL
MOLE FRACTION DRY GAS
PERCENT C02 BY VOL, DRY
PERCENT 02 BY VOL, DRY
PERCENT CO BY VOL, DRY
PERCENT N2 BY VOL, DRY
MOLECULAR WT-DRY STK GAS
MOLECULAR WT-STK GAS
AVG STACK TEMPERATURE DEG.F
NET SAMPLING POINTS
STACK PRESSURE, ABSOLUTE IN.HG
AVG STACK GAS VELOCITY FPS
STK FLOWRATE, DRY,STD CN DSCFM
ACTUAL STACK FLOWRATE ACFM
PERCENT ISOKINETIC
PARTICULATE WT-PARTIAL MG
PARTICULATE WT-TOTAL MG
PERC IMPINGER CATCH
PART. LOAD-PTL,STD CN GR/DSCF
PART. LOAD-TTL,STD CN GR/DSCF
PART. LOAD-PTL,STD CN @ 12% C02
PART. LOAD-TTL,STD CN @ 12% C02
PART. LOAD-PTL,STK CN GR/ACF
PART. LOAD-TTL,STK CN GR/ACF
PARTIC EMIS-PARTIAL LB/HR
PART 1C EMIS-TOTAL LB/HR
PART EMIS/WT PRD FD PTL LB/TON
PART EMIS/WT PRD FD TTL LB/TON
PERCENT EXCESS AIR
3
06-26-73
28.1*00
1*0.0
30.27
3.790
38.1*7
112.3
36.38
27.7
1.31
3.5
0.965
2.2
18.2
0.0
79.6
29.08
28.69
165.0
1
30.27
6.109
8619.
101*09.
97.7
18.90
37.30
1*9.3
0.00800
0.01579
0.01*365
0.08611*
0.00662
0.01307
0.59
1.17
8.39653
16.57092
61*6.7
«*
06-26-73
28.1*00
1*0.0
30.28
3.1*1*3
36.62
102.3
35.21
36.9
1.75
1*.7
0.953
2.2
18.2
0.0
79.6
29.08
28.56
171*. 0
1
30.28
5.71*7
7892.
979«*.
103.3
23.1*0
1*8.70
52.0
0.01023
0.02130
0.05582
0.11618
0.00821*
0.01715
0.69
l.l*t*
9.83372
20.1*6591
61*6.7
AVERAGE
5.928
8255.
10101.
100.5
21.15
1*3.00
50.6
0.00912
0.01855
0.01*973
0.10116
0.0071*3
0.01511
0.61*
1.30
9.11512
18.5181*2
61*6.7
B-15
-------
PLANT: B1MPB
LOCATION: NYC
OPERATOR: ERI
PARTICIPATE SUMMARY IN ENGLISH UNITS
DESCRIPTION UNITS
DATE OF RUN
STACK AREA FT2
NET TIME OF RUN MIN
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE IN.HG
AVG ORIFICE PRES DROP IN.H20
VOL DRY GAS-METER COND DCF
AVG GAS METER TEMP DEG.F
VOL DRY GAS-STD COND DSCF
TOTAL H20 COLLECTED ML
VOL H20 VAPOR-STD COND SCF
PERCENT MOISTURE BY VOL
MOLE FRACTION DRY GAS
PERCENT C02 BY VOL, DRY
PERCENT 02 BY VOL, DRY
PERCENT CO BY VOL, DRY
PERCENT N2 BY VOL, DRY
MOLECULAR WT-DRY STK GAS
MOLECULAR WT-STK GAS
AVG STACK TEMPERATURE DEG.F
NET SAMPLING POINTS
STACK PRESSURE, ABSOLUTE IN.HG
AVG STACK GAS VELOCITY FPS
STK FLOWRATE, DRY,STD CN DSCFM
ACTUAL STACK FLOWRATE ACFM
PERCENT ISOKINETIC
PARTICULATE WT-PARTIAL MG
PARTICULATE WT-TOTAL MG
PERC IMPINGER CATCH
PART. LOAD-PTL,STD CN GR/DSCF
PART. LOAD-TTL,STD CN GR/DSCF
PART. LOAD-PTL,STD CN @ 12% C02
PART. LOAD-TTL,STD CN @ 12% C02
PART. LOAD-PTL,STK CN GR/ACF
PART. LOAD-TTL,STK CN GR/ACF
PARTIC EMIS-PARTIAL LB/HR
PARTIC EMIS-TOTAL LB/HR
PART EMIS/WT PRO FD PTL LB/TON
PART EMIS/WT PRO FD TTL LB/TON
PERCENT EXCESS AIR
1
Ol*-ll-73
3.11*0
60.0
29.68
1.912
1*3.22
85.8
1*1.82
25.1
1.19
2.8
0.972
3.7
19.0
0.2
77.1
29.35
29.0l»
320.8
1
29.68
13.031
1607.
21*55.
99.9
85.50
120.80
29.2
0.0311*8
0.01*1*1*8
0.10211
0.11*1*26
0.02060
0.02910
0.1*3
0.61
17.0051U
21*. 02597
1299.5
2
Ol*-ll-73
3.11*0
60.0
29.68
1.776
1*2.09
89.8
1*0.1*2
2k. l*
1.15
2.8
0.972
3.7
19.0
0.2
77.1
29.35
29.01*
320.8
1
29.68
13.955
1721.
2629.
90.2
73.10
117.70
37.9
0.02785
0.01*1*81*
0.09032
0.11*51*3
0.01822
0.02933
0.1*1
0.66
16.10760
25.93523
1299.5
AVERAGE
13.1*93
1661*.
251*2.
95.0
79.30
119.25
33.6
0.02967
0.01*1*66
0.09621
0.11*1*81*
0.0191*1
0.02921
0.1*2
0.61*
16.55637
21*. 98059
1299.5
B-16
-------
PLANT:
LOCATION1:
OPERATOR: ERI
PARTICIPATE SUMMARY IN ENGLISH UNITS
DESCRIPTION UNITS
DATE OF RUN
STACK AREA FT2
NET TIME OF RUN MIN
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE IN.HG
AVG ORhFTCE PRES DROP I~N.H20
V01 DRY GAS-METER COND DCF
AVG GAS METER TEMP DEG.F
V01 DRY GAS-STD COND DSCF
TOTAL H20 COLLECTED ML
VOL H20 VAPOR-STD COND SCF
PERCENT MOISTURE BY VOL
MOLE FRACTION DRY GAS
PERCENT C02 BY VOL, DRY
PERCENT 02 BY VOL, DRY
PERCENT CO BY VOL, DRY
PERCENT N2 BY VOL, DRY
MOLECULAR WT-DRY STK GAS
MOLECU1AR WT-STK GAS
AVG STACK TEMPERATURE DEG. F
NET SAMPLING POINTS
STACK PRESSURE, ABSOLUTE IN.HG
AVG STACK GAS VELOCITY FPS
STK FLOWRATE, DRY,STD CN DSCFM
ACTUAL STACK FLOWRATE ACFM
PERCENT ISOKINETIC
PARTICULATE WT-PARTIAL MG
PARTICULATE WT-TOTAL MG
PERC IMPINGER CATCH
PART. LOAD-PTL,STD CN GR/DSCF
PART. 10AD-TTL,STD CN GR/DSCF
PART. 10AD-PTL,STD CN (3 12% C02
PART. LOAD-TTt,STR CN @ 12% C02
PART. LOAD-PTL,STK CN GR/ACF
PART. LOAD-TTL,STK CN GR/ACF
PARTIC EMIS-PARTIAL LB/HR
PARTfC EM IS-TOTAL 1B/HR
PART EMIS/WT PRD FD PTL LB/TON
PART EMIS/WT PRD FD TT1 LB/TON
PERCENT EXCESS AIR
1
Oft-10-73
1.000
60.0
0.978
32.87
79.5
31.82
ft5.2
2.1ft
6.3
0.937
3. ft
lft.1
0.0
82.5
29.11
28.ftl
23ft. 0
1
29. ft2
39.399
1663.
236ft.
93.6
37.00
77.20
52.1
0.01791
0.03736
0.06320
0.13186
0.01259
0.02626
0.26
0.53
15.1009ft
31.50787
183.6
2
Oft-10-73
1.000
60.0
0 . 8 ft 8
32.25
87.1
30.78
ft2.2
2.00
6.1
0.939
3. ft
1ft. 1
0.0
82.5
29.11
28.ft3
23ft.O
1
29.ft2
3ft. 93ft
Ift78.
2096.
101.8
72.90
120.60
39.6
0.036ft*
0.0603ft
0.1287ft
0.21298
0.02570
0.0ft252
O.ft6
0.76
27.33606
ft5. 22263
183.6
AVERAGE
37.166
1570.
2230.
97.7
5ft. 95
98.90
ft5.8
0.02719
0.0ft885
0.09597
0.172ft2
0.0191ft
0.03ft39
0.36
0.65
21.218ft9
38.36525
183.6
B-17
-------
PLANT: B3BPB
LOCATION: NYC
OPERATOR: ERI
PARTICIPATE SUMMARY IN ENGLISH UNITS
DESCRIPTION UNITS
DATE OF RUN
STACK AREA FT2
NET TIME OF RUN MIN
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE IN.HG
AVG ORIFICE PRES DROP IN.H20
VOL DRY GAS-METER COND DCF
AVG GAS METER TEMP DEG.F
VOL DRY GAS-STD COND DSCF
TOTAL H20 COLLECTED ML
VOL H20 VAPOR-STD COND SCF
PERCENT MOISTURE BY VOL
MOLE FRACTION DRY GAS
PERCENT C02 BY VOL, DRY
PERCENT 02 BY VOL, DRY
PERCENT CO BY VOL, DRY
PERCENT N2 BY VOL, DRY
MOLECULAR WT-DRY STK GAS
MOLECULAR WT-STK GAS
AVG STACK TEMPERATURE DEG.F
NET SAMPLING POINTS
STACK PRESSURE, ABSOLUTE IN.HG
AVG STACK GAS VELOCITY FPS
STK FLOWRATE, DRY,STD CN DSCFM
ACTUAL STACK FLOWRATE ACFM
PERCENT ISOKINETIC
PARTICULATE WT-PARTIAL MG
PARTICULATE WT-TOTAL MG
PERC IMPINGER CATCH
PART. LOAD-PTL,STD CN GR/DSCF
PART. LOAD-TTL,STD CN GR/DSCF
PART. LOAD-PTL,STD CN @ 12% C02
PART. LOAD-TTL,STD CN @ 12% C02
PART. LOAD-PTL,STK CN GR/ACF
PART. LOAD-TTL,STK CN GR/ACF
PARTIC EMIS-PARTIAL LB/HR
PARTIC EMIS-TOTAL LB/HR
PART EMIS/WT PRD FD PTL LB/TON
PART EMIS/WT PRD FD TTL LB/TON
PERCENT EXCESS AIR
1
OU-06-73
1.000
60.0
29.93
0.530
23.38
67.1
23. 5k
35.0
1.66
6.6
0.931*
5.0
13.2
0.0
81.8
29.33
28.58
228.0
1
29.93
25.127
1085.
1508.
106.1
36.00
68.50
1*7. if
0.02355
0.01*1*81
0.05652
0.10751*
0.01691*
0.03223
0.22
0.1*2
11.6U993
22.16721
157.2
2
01*-06-73
1.000
60.0
29.93
0.671*
29.02
70.1
29.07
37.0
1.75
5.7
0.91*3
5.0
13.2
0.0
81.8
29.33
28.68
228.0
1
29.93
29.078
1268.
171*5.
112.1
38.50
61.80
37.7
0.0201*0
0.03271*
O.OU895
0.07858
0.01«*81
0.02378
0.22
0.36
11.78939
18.921*27
157.2
AVERAGE
27.103
1176.
1626.
109.1
37.25
65.15
1*2.6
0.02197
0.03878
0.0527U
0.09306
0.01588
0.02800
0.22
0.39
11.71966
20.51*573
157.2
B-18
-------
PLANT: BliMPB
LOCATION: NYC
OPERATOR: ERI
PARTICIPATE SUMMARY IN ENGLISH UNITS
DESCRIPTION
DATE OF RUN
STACK AREA
NET TIME OF RUN
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE
AVG ORIFICE PRES DROP
VOL DRY GAS-METER COND
AVG GAS METER TEMP
VOL DRY GAS-STD COND
TOTAL H20 COLLECTED
VOL H20 VAPOR-STD COND
PERCENT MOISTURE BY VOt
MOLE FRACTION DRY GAS
PERCENT C02 BY VOL, DRY
PERCENT 02 BY VOL, DRY
PERCENT CO BY VOL, DRY
PERCENT N2 BY VOL, DRY
MOLECULAR WT-DRY STK GAS
MOLECULAR WT-STK GAS
AVG STACK TEMPERATURE
NET SAMPLING POINTS
STACK PRESSURE, ABSOLUTE
AVG STACK GAS VELOCITY
STK FLOWRATE, DRY,STD CN
ACTUAL STACK FLOWRATE
PERCENT ISOKINETK
PARTICULATE WT-PART I At
PARTICULATE WT-TOTAL
PERC IMPINGER CATCH
PART. LOAD-PTL,STD CN
PART. LOAD-TTL,STD CN
PART. LOAD-PTL,STD CN @
PART. LOAD-TTL,STD CN @
PART. LOAD-PTL,STK CN
PART. LOAD-TTL,STK CN
PART 1C EM IS-PART I At
PART 1C EM IS-TOTAL
PART EMIS/WT PRD FD PTL
PART EMIS/WT PRD Ft) TTL
PERCENT EXCESS AIR
UN 1 TS
FT2
MIN
I^N.HG
TN.H20
DCF
DEG.F
DSCF
ML
SCF
DEG.F
IN . HG
FPS
nscFM
ACFM
MG
MG
GR/DSCF
GR/DSCF
12 S C02
12% C02
GR/ACF
GR/ACP
LB/HR
LB/HR
LB/103 GAL
LB/103 GAL
1
Ol*-03-73
1.000
60.0
29.70
5.086
72.70
93 . 3
69.98
73.0
3.1*6
I*. 7
0.953
5.6
13.1
0.1
81.2
29. 1*2
28.88
301*. 0
1
29.70
37.703
11*81*.
2262.
102.5
71.50
109.80
3«*. 9
0.01573
0.021*16
0.03372
0.05178
0.01032
0.01581*
0,20
0.31
6.99820
10.71*688
155.6
2
Ol*-03-73
1.000
60.0
29.70
1*.779
66.01*
93.5
63.50
85.0
l*.03
6.0
0.91*0
5.6
13.1
0.1
81.2
29.U2
28.71*
301.0
1
29.70
35.1*05
1381.
2121*.
99.9
96.60
128.1*0
21*. 8
0.0231*3
0.03111*
0.05020
0.06673
0.01522
0.02023
0.28
0.37
9,691*31*
12.88561*
155.6
AVERAGE
36. 55'*
11*32.
2193.
101.2
81*. 05
119.10
29.8
0.01958
0.02765
0.01*196
0.05925
0.01277
0.01801*
0.21*
0.31*
8.31*627
11.81626
155.6
B-19
-------
PLANT: BifMPB
LOCATION; NYC
OPERATOR: ERI
PARTICIPATE SUMMARY IN ENGLISH UNITS
DESCRIPTION UNITS
DATE OF RUN
STACK AREA FT2
NET TIME OF RUN MIN
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE IN.HG
AVG ORIFICE PRES DROP IN.H20
VOL DRY GAS-METER COND DCF
AVG GAS METER TEMP DEG.F
VOL DRY GAS-STD COND DSCF
TOTAL H20 COLLECTED ML
VOL H20 VAPOR-STD COND < SCF
PERCENT MOISTURE BY VOL
MOLE FRACTION DRY GAS
PERCENT C02 BY VOL, DRY
PERCENT 02 BY VOL, DRY
PERCENT CO BY VOL, DRY
PERCENT N2 BY VOL, DRY
MOLECULAR WT-DRY STK GAS
MOLECULAR WT-STK GAS
AVG STACK TEMPERATURE DEG.F
NET SAMPLING POINTS
STACK PRESSURE, ABSOLUTE IN.HG
AVG STACK GAS VELOCITY FPS
STK FLOWRATE, DRY,STD CN DSCFM
ACTUAL STACK FLOWRATE ACFM
PERCENT ISOKINETIC
PARTICULATE WT-PARTIAL MG
PARTICULATE WT-TOTAL MG
PERC IMPINGER CATCH
PART. LOAD-PTL,STD CN GR/DSCF
PART. LOAD-TTL,STD CN GR/DSCF
PART. LOAD-PTL,STD CN @ 12% C02
PART. LOAD-TTL,STD CN @ 12% C02
PART. LOAD-PTL,STK CN GR/ACF
PART. LOAD-TTL,STK CN GR/ACF
PARTIC EMIS-PARTIAL LB/HR
PARTIC EMIS-TOTAL LB/HR
PART EMIS/WT PRD FD PTL LB/TON
PART EMIS/WT PRD FD TTL LB/TON
PERCENT EXCESS AIR
1
04-03-73
1.000
60.0
29.70
5.086
72.70
93.3
69.98
73.0
3.^6
4.7
0.953
5.6
13.1
0.1
81.2
29.42
28.88
304.0
1
29.70
37.703
1484.
2262.
102.5
71.50
109.80
34.9
0.01573
0.02416
0.03372
0.05178
0.01032
0.01584
0.20
0.31
6.99820
10.74688
155.6
2
04-03-73
1.000
60.0
29.70
4.779
66.04
93.5
63.50
85.0
4.03
6.0
0.940
5.6
13.1
0.1
81.2
29.42
28.74
301.0
1
29.70
35.405
1381.
2124.
99.9
96.60
128.40
24.8
0.02343
0.03114
0.05020
0.06673
0.01522
0.02023
0.28
0.37
9.69434
12.88564
155.6
AVERAGE
36.554
1432.
2193.
101.2
84.05
119.10
29.8
0.01958
0.02765
0.04196
0.05925
0.01277
0.01804
0.24
0.34
8.34627
11.81626
155.6
B-20
-------
PLANT: B58PB
LOCATION: NYC
OPERATOR: ERt
PARTICIPATE SUMMARY IN ENGLISH UNITS
DESCRIPTION UNITS
DATE OF RUN
STACK AREA FT2
NET TIME OF RUN MIN
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE IN.HG
AVG ORIFICE PRES DROP IN.H20
VOL DRY GAS-METER COND DCF
AVG GAS METER TEMP DEG.F
VOL DRY GAS-STD COND DSCF
TOTAL H20 COLLECTED ML
VOL H20 VAPOR-STD COND SCF
PERCENT MOISTURE BY VOL
MOLE FRACTION DRY GAS
PERCENT C02 BY VOL/ DRY
PERCENT 02 BY VOL, DRY
PERCENT CO BY VOL, DRY
PERCENT N2 BY VOL, DRY
MOLECULAR WT-DRY STK GAS
MOLECULAR WT-STK GAS
AVG STACK TEMPERATURE DEG.F
NET SAMPLING POINTS
STACK PRESSURE, ABSOLUTE IN.HG
AVG STACK GAS VELOCITY FPS
STK FLOWRATE, DRY,STD CN DSCFM
ACTUAL STACK FLOWRATE ACFM
PERCENT ISOKINETIC
PARTICULATE WT-PARTIAL MG
PARTICULATE WT-TOTAL MG
PERC IMPINGER CATCH
PART. LOAD-PTL,STn CN GR/DSCF
PART. LOAD-TTL,STn CN GR/DSCF
PART. LOAD-PTL,STD CN @ 12? C02
PART. LOAD-TTL,STD CN (3 12% C02
PART. LOAD-PTL,STK CN GR/ACF
PART. LOAD-TTL,STK CN GR/ACF
PARTIC EMIS-PARTIAL LB/HR
PART 1C EMIS-TOTAL LB/HR
PART EMIS/WT PRD FD PTL LB/TON
PART EMIS/WT PRD FD TTL LB/TON
PERCENT EXCESS AIR
1
05-12-73
2.780
60.0
30.38
1.210
34.17
82.5
33.99
52.0
2.46
6.8
0.932
7.0
10.8
0.0
82.2
29.55
28.77
293.0
1
30.38
9.779
1087.
1631.
106.3
74.40
117.10
36.5
0.03371
0.05306
0.05779
0.09096
0.0221*5
0.03533
0.31
0.1*9
7.98955
12.571*96
99.1
2
05-12-73
2.780
60/0
30.38
1.28-0
35.56
867&
35^09
50/8
2 . 41
6.U
0.936
7.0
10.8
0.0
82.2
29.55
28.81
295.0
1
30.38
10.1*99
1168.
1751.
102.1
233. UO
322.50
27.6
0.1021* I*
0.11*155
0.17561
0.24265
0.06827
0.091*34
1.03
1.1*2
26.09265
36. 05347
99.1
AVERAGE
10.139
1127.
1691.
104.2
153.90
219.80
32.0
0.06808
0.09730
0.11670
0.16680
0.04536
0.06483
0.67
0.96
17.04109
24.31421
99.1
B-21
-------
KLANi: CiBHB
LOCATION: NYC
OPERATOR: ERI
PARTICULATE SUMMARY IN ENGLISH UNITS
DESCRIPTION
DATE OF RUN
STACK AREA
NET TtME OF RUN
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE
AVG ORIFICE PRES DROP
VOL DRY GAS-METER COND
AVG GAS METER TEMP
VOL DRY GAS-STD COND
TOTAL H20 COLLECTED
VOL H20 VAPOR-STD COND
PERCENT MOrSTURE BY VOL
MOLE FRACTION DRY GAS
PERCENT C02 BY VOL, DRY
PERCENT 02 BY VOL, DRY
PERCENT CO BY VOL, DRY
PERCENT N2 BY VOL, DRY
MOLECULAR WT-DRY STK GAS
MOLECULAR WT-STK GAS
AVG STACK TEMPERATURE
NET SAMPLING POINTS
STACK PRESSURE, ABSOLUTE
AVG STACK GAS VELOCITY
STK FLOWRATE, DRY,STD CN
ACTUAL STACK FLOWRATE
PERCENT ISOKINETIC
PARTrCULATE WT-PARTIAL
PARTICULATE WT-TOTAL
PERC IMPTNGER CATCH
UN 1 TS
FT2
MIN
IN.HG
IN.H20
DCF
DEG.F
DSCF
ML
SCF
PART. LOAD-PTL,STD CN
PART. 10AD-TTL,STD CN
PART. LOAD-PTL,STD CN @
PART. LOAD-TTL,STD CN (9
PART. LOAD-PTL,STK CN
PART. LOAD-TTL,STK CN
PART 1C EM IS-PARTIAL
PARTIC EMIS-TOTAL
PART EMIS/WT PRD FD PTL
PART EMIS/WT PRD FD TTL
PERCENT EXCESS AIR
DEG.F
IN.HG
FPS
DSCFM
ACFM
MG
MG
GR/DSCF
GR/DSCF
12% C02
12% C02
GR/ACF
GR/ACF
LB/HR
LB/HR
LB/TON
IB/TON
1
06-27-73
1*9. onn
60.0
29.97
6.137
81.59
92.6
79.51*
61.3
2.91
3.5
0.965
1.1*
19.7
0.0
78.9
29.01
28.62
158.0
1
29.97
8.229
2001*5.
21*192.
105.6
21.80
56.80
61.6
0.001*22
0.01100
0.03618
0.091*26
0.00350
0.00911
0.71
1.89
7.39971*
19.28001*
171*1*.0
2*
06-27-73
1*9.000
61*. 0
29.97
7.687
70.10
81.1
70.06
61.3
2.91
1*.0
0.960
1.1*
19.7
0.0
78.9
29.01
28.57
180.0
1
29.97
7.1*36
171*09.
21863.
100.1*
8.20
59.30
86.2
0.00180
0.01301*
0. 0151*5
0.11173
0.0011*3
0.01037
0.27
1.95
2.71*1*73
19.81*901*
17'*1*.0
AVERAGE
7.832
18727.
23027.
103.0
15.00
58.05
73.9
0.00301
0.01202
0.02581
0.10300
0.0021*6
0.00971*
0.50
1.92
5.07223
19.561*51*
171* I*. 0
B-22
-------
PLANT: CIBHB(SOOT)
LOCATION: NYC
OPERATOR: ERI
PARTICIPATE SUMMARY IN ENGLISH UNITS
DESCRIPTION
DATE OF RUN
STACK AREA
NET TIME OF RUN
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE
AVG ORIFICE PRES DROP
VOL DRY GAS-METER COND
AVG GAS METER TEMP
VOL DRY GAS-STD COND
TOTAL H20 COLLECTED
VOL H20 VAPOR-STD COND
PERCENT MOISTURE BY VOL
MOLE FRACTION DRY GAS
PERCENT C02 BY VOL, DRY
PERCENT 02 BY VOL, DRY
PERCENT CO BY VOL, DRY
PERCENT N2 BY VOL, DRY
MOLECULAR WT-DRY STK GAS
MOLECULAR WT-STK GAS
AVG STACK TEMPERATURE
NET SAMPLING POINTS
STACK PRESSURE, ABSOLUTE
AVG STACK GAS VELOCITY
STK FLOWRATE, DRY,STD CN
ACTUAL STACK FLOWRATE
PERCENT ISOKINETIC
PARTICULATE WT-PARTIAL
PARTICULATE WT-TOTAL
PERC IMPINGER CATCH
UNITS
FT2
MIN
IN.HG
IN.H20
DCF
DEG.F
DSCF
ML
SCF
PART
PART
PART
PART
PART
PART
CN
LOAD-PTL,STD
LOAD-TTL,STD CN
LOAD-PTL,STD CN @
LOAD-TTL,STD CN @
LOAD-PTL,STK CN
LOAD-TTL,STK CN
PARTIC EMIS-PARTIAL
PART 1C EMIS-TOTAL
PART EMfS/WT PRO FD PTL
PART EMIS/WT PRO FD TTL
PERCENT EXCESS AIR
DEG.F
IN.HG
FPS
DSCFM
ACFM
MG
MG
GR/DSCF
GR/DSCF
12% C02
12% C02
GR/ACF
GR/ACF
LB/HR
LB/HR
LB/TON
LB/TON
3
06-27-73
lt9.000
61*. 0
29. 91*
5.U60
76.59
92.0
71*. 56
53.7
2.55
3.3
0.967
1.7
18.5
0.1
79.7
29.01
28.65
150.0
1
29.91*
7.735
19116.
2271*2.
97.3
21.80
61*. 00
65.9
0.001*50
0.01322
0.03179
0.09331
0.00378
0.01111
0.71*
2.17
7.1*1506
21.76898
712.1
l*
06-27-73
1*9.000
6U. 0
29.91*
6.<*!*0
79.97
82.5
79.1*0
50.1
2.37
2.9
0.971
1.7
18.5
0.1
79.7
29.01
28.69
150.0
1
29.91*
8.267
20511*.
21*306.
96.6
27.30
66.00
58.6
0.00529
0.01280
0.03738
0.09036
0.001*1*7
0.01080
0.93
2.25
9.35736
22.62215
712.1
AVERAGE
8.001
19815.
23521*.
97.0
21*. 55
65.00
62.3
0.001*90
0.01301
0.031*58
0.09181*
0.001*12
0.01095
0.83
2.21
8.38621
22.19556
712.1
B-23
-------
PLANT: D1MPB
LOCATION: NYC
OPERATOR: ERI
PARTICIPATE SUMMARY IN ENGLISH UNITS
DESCRIPTION
DATE OF RUN
STACK AREA
NET TIME OF RUN
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE
AVG ORIFICE PRES DROP
VOL DRY GAS-METER COND
AVG GAS METER TEMP
VOL DRY GAS-STD COND
TOTAL H20 COLLECTED
VOL H20 VAPOR-STD COND
PERCENT MOISTURE BY VOL
MOLE FRACTION DRY GAS
PERCENT C02 BY VOL/ DRY
PERCENT 02 BY VOL, DRY
PERCENT CO BY VOL, DRY
PERCENT N2 BY VOL, DRY
MOLECULAR WT-DRY STK GAS
MOLECULAR WT-STK GAS
AVG STACK TEMPERATURE
NET SAMPLING POINTS
STACK PRESSURE, ABSOLUTE
AVG STACK GAS VELOCITY
STK FLOWRATE, DRYXSTD CN
ACTUAL STACK FLOWRATE
PERCENT ISOKINETIC
PARTICULATE WT-PARTIAL
PARTICULATE WT-TOTAL
PERC IMPINGER CATCH
PART. LOAD-PTL,STD CN
PART. LOAD-TTL,STD CN
PART. LOAD-PTL,STD CN @
PART. LOAD-TTL,STD CN (3
PART. LOAD-PTL,STK CN
PART. LOAD-TTL,STK CN
PARTIC EMIS-PARTIAL
PART 1C EMIS-TOTAL
PART EMIS/WT PRO FD PTL
PART EMIS/WT PRO FD TTL
PERCENT EXCESS AIR
UNITS
AVERAGE
03-27-73 03-27-73
FT2
MIN
IN.HG
IN.H20
DCF
DEG.F
DSCF
ML
SCF
DEG.F
IN.HG
FPS
1 DSCFM
ACFM
MG
MG
GR/DSCF
GR/DSCF
12% C02
12% C02
GR/ACF
GR/ACF
LB/HR
LB/HR
LB/TON
LB/TON
1.000
60.0
29.86
2.100
1*8.59
83.3
1*7.53
81.0
3.8U
7.5
0.925
7.0
10.7
0.5
81.8
29.55
28.68
310.0
1
29.86
25.727
981.
151*1*.
105.3
50.20
85.30
ftl.l
0.01626
0.02761*
0.02788
O.OU738
0.01033
0.01755
0.1**
0.23
8.51*670
11*. 52258
93.8
1.000
60.0
29.86
2.158
1*8.16
8t*. 7
1*7.00
79.0
3.71*
7.1*
0.926
7.0
10.7
0.5
81.8
29.55
28.70
312.0
1
29.86
25.100
955.
1506.
106.9
U5.50
95.30
52.3
0.011*91
0.03123
0.02556
0.05353
0.0091*5
0.01980
0.12
0.26
7.63137
15.98391*
93.8
25.1*11*
968.
1525.
106.1
1*7.85
90.30
1*6.7
0.01559
0.029U3
0.02672
0.0501*5
0.00989
0.01868
0.13
0.21*
8.08903
15.25326
93.8
B-24
-------
PLANT: D2MPB
LOCATION: NYC
OPERATOR: ERI
PARTICULATE SUMMARY IN ENGLISH UNITS
DESCRIPTION
DATE OF RUN
STACK AREA
NET TIME OF RUN
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE
AVG ORIFICE PRES D
VOL DRY GAS-METER
AVG GAS METER TEMP
VOL DRY GAS-STD CO
TOTAL H20 COLLECTED
VOL H20 VAPOR-STD
PERCENT MOISTURE BY
MOLE FRACTION DRY G
PERCENT C02 BY VOL,
PERCENT 02 BY VOL,
PERCENT CO BY VOL,
PERCENT N2 BY VOL,
MOLECULAR WT-DRY SI
MOLECULAR WT-STK GA
AVG STACK TEMPERATURE
NET SAMPLING POINTS
STACK PRESSURE, AB
AVG STACK GAS VELO
STK FLOWRATE, DRY,
ACTUAL STACK FLOWR
PERCENT ISOKINETIC
PARTICULATE WT-PAR
PARTICULATE WT-TOTAL
PERC IMPINGER CATCH
PART. LOAD-PTL/STD
PART. LOAD-TTL,STD
PART. LOAD-PTL,STD
PART. LOAD-TTL,STD
PART. LOAD-PTL,STK
PART. LOAD-TTL,STK
PARTIC EMIS-PARTIAL
PARTIC EMIS-TOTAL
PART EMIS/WT PRO FD
PART EMIS/WT PRO FD
PERCENT EXCESS AIR
UNITS
AVERAGE
03-23-73 03-23-73
(OP
IOND
ID
)
:OND
' VOL
SAS
DRY
DRY
DRY
DRY
'K GAS
tS
JRE
SOLUTE
IITY
ITD CN
kTE
•IAL
tL
{
CN
CN
CN @
CN @
CN
CN
) PTL
) TTL
FT2
MIN
IN.HG
IN.H20
DCF
DEG.F
DSCF
ML
SCF
DEG.F
IN.HG
FPS
DSCFM
ACFM
MG
MG
GR/DSCF
GR/DSCF
12% C02
12| C02
GR/ACF
GR/ACF
LB/HR
LB/HR
LB/TON
LB/TON
1.000
60.0
30. Ok
1.01*3
33.61*
7k. 5
33.56
1*6.0
2.18
6.1
0.939
5.8
13.7
0.5
80.0
29.1*8
28.78
227.0
1
30.01*
36.308
1581*.
2178.
103.6
900.90
935.10
3.7
O.U1339
0.1*2908
0.85528
0.88775
0.300U2
0.31183
5.61
5.83
********
********
175. l*
1.000
60.0
30. 01*
1.012
33.96
68.3
31*. 28
52.0
2.U6
6.7
0.933
5.8
13.7
0.5
80.0
29.1*8
28.71
227.0
1
30. OU
31*. 92U
1511*.
2095.
110.7
61*5.70
668.80
3.5
0.29007
0.3001*1*
0.60011*
0.62161
0.2091*1*
0.21693
3.76
3.90
lit*. 1*01*37
118.1*9721*
175.1*
35.616
151*9.
2137.
107.2
773.30
801.95
3.6
0.35173
0.361*76
0.72771
0.751*68
0.251*93
0.261*38
l*.69
l*. 86
11*2.501*81*
11*7.78955
175.1*
B-25
-------
PLANT: D3MPB
LOCATION: NYC
OPERATOR: ERI
PARTICULATE SUMMARY IN ENGLISH UNTTS
DESCRIPTION UNITS
HATE OF RUN
STACK AREA FT2
NET TIME OF RUN MIN
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE IN.HG
AVG ORIFICE PRES DROP IN.H20
VOL PRY GAS-METER COND OCF
AVG GAS METER TEMP DEG.F
VOL DRY GAS-STD COND DSCF
TOTAL H20 COLLECTED ML
VOL H20 VAPOR-STD COND SCF
PERCENT MOISTURE BY VOL
MOLE FRACTION DRY GAS
PERCENT C02 BY VOL, DRY
PERCENT 02 BY VOt, DRY
PERCENT CO BY VOL, DRY
PERCENT N2 BY VOL, DRY
MOLECULAR WT-DRY STK GAS
MOLECULAR WT-STK GAS
AVG STACK TEMPERATURE DEG.F
NET SAMPLING POINTS
STACK PRESSURE, ABSOLUTE IN.HG
AVG STACK GAS VELOCITY FPS
STK FLOWRATE, DRY,STD CN DSCFM
ACTUAL STACK FLOWRATE ACFM
PERCENT ISOKINETIC
PARTICULATE WT-PARTIAL MR
PARTICULATE WT-TOTAL MH
PERC IMPINGER CATCH
PART. LOAD-PTL,STO CN GR/DSCF
PART. LOAD-TTt,STD CN GR/DSCF
PART. LOAD-PTL,STD CN fl 11% C02
PART. LOAD-TTL,STD CN @ 122 C02
PART. LOAD-PTL,STK CN GR/ACF
PART. LOAD-TTL,STK CN GR/ACF
PART 1C EMIS-PARTTAL LB/HR
PARTIC EMIS-TOTAL LB/HR
PART EMIS/WT PRO FD PTL LB/TON
PART EMIS/WT PRD FD TTL LB/TON
PERCENT EXCESS AIR
1
04-04-73
i.ooo
eo.o
29.71
0.915
32.36
86.3
31.24
U9.7
2.36
7.0
0.930
5.6
13.1
0.2
81.1
29.1*2
28.62
280.0
1
29.71
36.155
1U3U.
2169.
106.5
35.20
125.60
72.0
0.01735
0.06192
0.03718
0.13268
0.011^7
0.04091
0.21
0.76
5.25436
18.74850
154.6
2
04-04-73
1.000
60.0
29.71
0.840
30.20
81.8
29.39
40.0
1.90
6.1
0.939
5.6
13.0
0.2
81.2
29.42
28.72
279.0
1
29.71
35.308
1417.
2118.
101.4
65.00
112.70
42.3
0.03406
0.05905
0.07299
0.12655
0.02277
0.039-48
0.41
0.72
10.08946
17.49356
151.1
AVERAGE
35.732
1426.
2T44.
104.0
50.10
119.15
57.1
0.02571
0.06049
0 . 0 5 5 0 «
0.12961
0.01712
0.04019
0.31
0.74
7.67191
18.12103
152.8
B-26
-------
PLANT: D4BPB
LOCATION: NYC
OPERATOR: ERI
PARTICULATE SUMMARY IN ENGLISH UNITS
DESCRIPTION
DATE OF RUN
STACK AREA
NET TIME OF RUN
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE
AVG ORIFICE PRES DROP
VOL DRY GAS-METER COND
AVG GAS METER TEMP
VOL DRY GAS-STD COND
TOTAL H20 COLLECTED
VOL H20 VAPOR-STD COND
PERCENT MOISTURE BY VOL
MOLE FRACTION DRY GAS
PERCENT C02 BY VOL, DRY
PERCENT 02 BY VOL, DRY
PERCENT CO BY VOL, DRY
PERCENT N2 BY VOL, PRY
MOLECULAR WT-DRY STK GAS
MOLECULAR WT-STK GAS
AVG STACK TEMPERATURE
NET SAMPLING POINTS
STACK PRESSURE, ABSOLUTE
AVG STACK GAS VELOCITY
STK FLOWRATE, DRY,STD CN
ACTUAL STACK FLOWRATE
PERCENT ISOKINETIC
PARTICULATE WT-PARTIAL
PARTICULATE WT-TOTAL
PERC IMPINGER CATCH
LOAD-PTL,STD CN
LOAD-TTL,STD CN
UNITS
FT2
MIN
IN.HG
IN.H20
DCF
DEG.F
DSCF
ML
SCF
PART
PART
PART
PART
PART
PART
LOAD-PTL,STD CN @
LOAD-TTL,STD CN @
LOAD-PTL,STK CN
LOAD-TTL,STK CN
PARTIC EMIS-PARTIAL
PART 1C EMIS-TOTAL
PART EMtS/WT PRD FD PTL
PART EMtS/WT PRD FD TTL
PERCENT EXCESS AIR
DEG.F
IN.HG
FPS
DSCFM
ACFM
MG
MG
GR/DSCF
GR/DSCF
12% C02
12% C02
GR/ACF
GR/ACF
LB/HR
LB/HR
LB/TON
LB/TON
1
05-05-73
1.000
60.0
30.35
0.990
32.66
58.2
33.95
l*l*.0
2.09
5.8
0.91*2
1*.8
13.5
1.0
80.7
29.31
28.65
278.0
1
30.35
37.579
15U7.
2255.
107.3
289.20
335.30
13.7
0.13117
0.15208
0.32791*
0.38021
0.08996
0.101*30
1.7t*
2.02
1*1.1*1705
1*8.01915
156.5
2
05-05-73
1.000
60.0
30.30
1.038
31.71
61.3
32.72
1*3.8
2.08
6.0
0.91*0
l».8
13.5
1.0
80.7
29.31
28.63
278.0
1
30.30
38.01*0
1561.
2282.
102.5
179.20
266.50
32.8
0.081*31*
0.1251*3
0.21085
0.31357
0.05763
0.08571
1.13
1.68
26.86107
39.91*681*
156.5
AVERAGE
37.809
1551*.
2269.
101*. 9
231*. 20
300.90
23.3
0.10776
0.13876
0.26939
0.31*689
0.07380
0.09500
1.1*3
1.85
31*. 13905
1*3.98299
156.5
B-27
-------
PLANT: U1BPB
LOCATION: NYC
OPERATOR: ERI
PARTICIPATE SUMMARY IN ENGLISH UNITS
DESCRIPTION
DATE OF RUN
STACK AREA
NPT TIME OF RUN
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE
AVG ORIFICE PRES DROP
VOL DRY GAS-METER COND
AVG GAS METER TEMP
VOL DRY GAS-STD COND
TOTAL H20 COLLECTED
VOL H20 VAPOR-STD COND
PERCENT MOISTURE BY VOL
MOLE FRACTION DRY GAS
PERCENT C02 BY VOL, DRY
PERCENT 02 BY VOL, DRY
PERCENT CO BY VOL, DRY
PERCENT N2 BY VOL, DRY
MOLECULAR WT-DRY STK GAS
MOLECULAR WT-STK GAS
AVG STACK TEMPERATURE
NET SAMPLING POINTS
STACK PRESSURE, ABSOLUTE
AVG STACK GAS VELOCITY
STK FLOWRATE, DRY,STD CN
ACTUAL STACK FLOWRATE
PERCENT ISOKINETIC
PARTICULATE WT-PARTIAL
PARTICULATE WT -TOTAL
PERC IMPINGER CATCH
LOAD-PTL,STD CN
LOAD-TTL,STD CN
LOAD-PTL,STD CN @
LOAD-TTL,STD CN @
LOAD-PTL,STK CN
PART. LOAD-TTL,STK CN
PARTIC EMIS-PARTIAL
PART 1C EMIS-TOTAL
PART EMIS/WT PRD FD PTL
PART EMIS/WT PRD FD TTL
PERCENT EXCESS AIR
UNITS
FT2
MIN
IN.HG
IN.H20
DCF
DEG.F
DSCF
ML
SCF
PART
PART
PART
PART
PART
DEG.F
IN.HG
FPS
DSCFM
ACFM
MG
MG
GR/DSCF
GR/DSCF
12% C02
12% C02
GR/ACF
GR/ACF
LB/HR
LB/HR
LB/TON
LB/TON
1
05-22-73
1.000
60.0
29.6U
1.051*
33.36
86.1
32. Ik
1+8.2
2.28
6.6
0.931*
1.5
18.9
0.2
79. I*
29.00
28.27
305.0
1
29.61*
tfO.181
15i*«*.
2kll.
101.8
230.90
286.10
19.3
0.11062
0.13707
0.88«*97
1.09653
0.07083
0.08776
1.U6
1.81
i»9. 81177
61.72005
869.7
2
05-22-73
1.000
60.0
29.6U
0.959
31.82
78.9
31.07
1*3.9
2.08
6.3
0.937
1.5
18.9
0.2
79. k
29.00
28.31
305.0
1
29.6U
38.3U9
11+80.
2301.
102.7
87.20
115.50
2k. 5
0.01*323
0.05725
0.31*580
0.1*5803
0.02778
0.03680
0.55
0.73
18.61*821
2k. 70033
869.7
AVERAGE
39.265
1512.
2356.
102.2
159.05
200.80
21.9
0.07692
0.09716
0.61538
0.77728
0.01*931
0.06228
1.01
1.27
31*. 22998
1*3. 21017
869.7
B-28
-------
OPERATOR: ERI
PARTI CULATE SUMMARY IN ENGUSH UNITS
DESCRIPTION UNITS
DATE OF RUN
STACK AREA FT2
NET TIME OF RUN MIN
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE IN.HG
AVG ORIFICE PRES DROP IN.H20
VOL DRY GAS-METER COND DCF
AVG GAS METER TEMP DEG.F
VOL DRY GAS-STD COND DSCF
TOTAL H20 COLLECTED Ml
VOL H20 VAPOR-STD COND SCF
PERCENT MOISTURE BY VOL
MOLE FRACTION DRY GAS
PERCENT C02 BY VOL, DRY
PERCENT 02 BY VOL, DRY
PERCENT CO BY VOL, DRY
PERCENT N2 BY VOL, DRY
MOLECULAR WT-DRY STK GAS
MOLECULAR WT-STK GAS
AVG STACK TEMPERATURE DEG.F
NET SAMPLING POINTS
STACK PRESSURE, ABSOLUTE IN.HG
AVG STACK GAS VELOCITY FPS
STK FLOWRATE, DRY,STD CN DSCFM
ACTUAL STACK FLOWRATE ACFM
PERCENT I-SOKINETIC
PARTrCUtATE WT-PARTIAL MG
PARTICULATE WT-TOTAL MG
PERC IMPINGER CATCH
PART. LOAD-PPL,STD CN GR/DSCF
PART. LOAD-TTL,STD CN GR/DSCF
PART. LOAD-PTL,STD CN (3 12% C02
PART. LOAD-TTL,STD CN @ 12% C02.
PART. LOAD-PTL,STK CN GR/ACF
PART. LOAD-TTL,STK CN GR/ACF
PART 1C EM IS-PARTIAL LB/HR
PARTIC EMIS-TOTAL LB/HR
PART EMIS/WT PRO FD PTL LB/TON
PART EMIS/WT PRO FD TTL LB/TON
PERCENT EXCESS AIR
1
04-20-73
i.nno
eo. n
30.40
3.640
57.47
76.0
58.24
65.2
3.09
5.0
0.950
5,5
11. R
0.5
82.2
29,35
28.78
210.0
1
30.40
23.033
1283.
1582.
98.6
84.60
114,30
26.0
0.02237
0.03023
0.04881
0.06595
0.01706
0.02305
0.25
0.33
8,09577
10.93790
113.8
2
04-20-73
1.000
60.0
30.40
3.199
62.46
76.4
63.17
63.0
2.99
4.5
0.955
5,5
11,8
0.5
82.2
29.35
28.84
210.0
1
30.40
28.038
1291.
1682.
106.4
31.60
73.60
57.1
0.00770
0.01794
0.01681
0.03915
0.00591
0.01376
0.09
0.20
2.80365
6.53003
113.8
AVERAGE
28.035
1287.
1682.
102.5
58.10
93.95
41.5
0.01504
0.02408
0.03281
0.05255
0.01148
0.01841
0.17
0.27
5.44971
8.73396
113.8
B-29
-------
PLANT: U2MPB
LOCATION: NYC
OPERATOR: ERI
PARTICIPATE SUMMARY IN ENGLISH UNITS
DESCRIPTION
DATE OF RUN
STACK AREA
NET TIME OF RUN
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE
AVG ORIFICE PRES DROP
VOL DRY GAS-METER COND
AVG GAS METER TEMP
VOL DRY GAS-STD COND
TOTAL H20 COLLECTED
VOL H20 VAPOR-STD COND
PERCENT MOISTURE BY VOL
MOLE FRACTION DRY GAS
PERCENT C02 BY VOL, DRY
PERCENT 02 BY VOL, DRY
PERCENT CO BY VOL, DRY
PERCENT N2 BY VOL, DRY
MOLECULAR WT-DRY STK GAS
MOLECULAR WT-STK GAS
AVG STACK TEMPERATURE
NET SAMPLING POINTS
STACK PRESSURE, ABSOLUTE
AVG STACK GAS VELOCITY
STK FLOWRATE, DRY,STD CN
ACTUAL STACK FLOWRATE
PERCENT ISOKINETIC
PARTICULATE WT-PARTIAL
PARTICULATE WT-TOTAL
PERC IMPINGER CATCH
PART. LOAD-PTL,STD CN
PART. LOAD-TTL,STD CN
PART. LOAD-PTL,STD CN @
PART. LOAD-TTL,STD CN @
PART. LOAD-PTL,STK CN
PART. LOAD-TTL,STK CN
PARTIC EMIS-PARTIAL
UNITS
FT2
MIN
IN.HG
N.H20
DCF
DEC. F
DSCF
ML
SCF
PARTIC EMIS-TOTAL
PART EMIS/WT PRO FD
PART EMIS/WT PRD FD
PERCENT EXCESS AIR
PTL
TTL
DEG.F
IN.HG
FPS
DSCFM
ACFM
MG
MG
GR/DSCF
GR/DSCF
12% C02
12% C02
GR/ACF
GR/ACF
LB/HR
LB/HR
LB/TON
LB/TON
1
04-20-73
1.000
60.0
30.40
3.640
57.47
76.0
58.24
65.2
3.09
5.0
0.950
5.5
11.8
0.5
82.2
29.35
28.78
210.0
1
30.40
28.033
1283.
1682.
98.6
84.60
114.30
26.0
0.02237
0.03023
0.04881
0.06595
0.01706
0.02305
0.25
0.33
8.09577
10.93790
113.8
2
04-20-73
1.000
60.0
30.40
3.199
62.46
76.4
63.17
63.0
2.99
4.5
0.955
5.5
11.8
0.5
82.2
29.35
28.84
210.0
1
30.40
28.038
1291.
1682.
106.4
31.60
73.60
57.1
0.00770
0.01794
0.01681
0.03915
0.00591
0.01376
0.09
0.20
2.80365
6.53003
113.8
AVERAGE
28.035
1287.
1682.
102.5
58.10
93.95
41.5
0.01504
0.02408
0.03281
0.05255
0.01148
0.01841
0.17
0.27
5.44971
8.73396
113.8
B-30
-------
PLANT: U3MPB
LOCATION: NYC
OPERATOR: ERl
PARTtCULATE SUMMARY IN ENGLISH UNITS
DESCRIPTION UNITS
DATE OF RUN
STACK AREA FT2
NET TIME OF RUN MIN
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE IN.HG
AVG ORIFICE PRES DROP IN.K20
VOL DRY GAS-METER COND DCF
AVG GAS METER TEMP DEG.F
VOL DRY GAS-STD COND DSCF
TOTAL H20 COLLECTED ML
VOL H20 VAPOR-STD COND SCF
PERCENT MOISTURE BY VOL
MOLE FRACTION DRY GAS
PERCENT C02 BY VOL, DRY
PERCENT 02 BY VOL, DRY
PERCENT CO BY VOL, DRY
PERCENT N2 BY VOL, DRY
MOLECULAR WT-DRY STK GAS
MOLECULAR WT-STK GAS
AVG STACK TEMPERATURE DEG.F
NET SAMPLING POINTS
STACK PRESSURE, ABSOLUTE IN.HG
AVG STACK GAS VELOCITY FPS
STK FLOWRATE, DRY,STD CN DSCFM
ACTUAL STACK FLOWRATE ACFM
PERCENT ISOKINETIC
PARTICULATE WT-PARTIAL MG
PARTICULATE WT-TOTAL MG
PERC IMPINGER CATCH
PART. LOAD-PTL,STD CN GR/DSCF
PART. LOAD-TTL,STD CN GR/DSCF
PART. LOAD-PTL,STD CN @ 12% C02
PART. LOAD-TTL,STD CN @ 12? C02
PART. LOAD-PTL,STK CN GR/ACF
PART. LOAD-TTL,STK CN GR/ACF
PARTIC EMIS-PARTIAL LB/HR
PARTIC EMIS-TOTAL LB/HR
'PART EMIS/WT PRO FD PTL LB/TON
PART EMIS/WT PRO FD TTL LB/TON
PERCENT EXCESS AIR
1
Ol*-18-73
3.1UO
96.0
30.21*
2.1*11*
85.05
91*. 8
82.58
58.7
2.78
3.3
0.967
3.5
16.0
1.0
79.5
29.20
28.83
205.0
1
30.21*
20.701
3039.
3900.
78.U
1*8.80
98.50
50.5
0.00910
0.01837
0.03120
0.06298
0.00709
0.011*30
0.21*
0.1*8
11.731*11
23.681*62
282.1*
2
Ol*-18-73
3.11*0
96.0
30.21*
1.761*
68.01
90.8
66.1*1*
1*3.9"
2.08
3.0
0.970
3.5
16.0
1.0
79.5
29.20
28.86
207.0
1
30.21*
16.1*31*
21*11.
3096.
79.5
52.60
81*. 00
37.1*
0.01220
0.0191*8
0.01*182
0.06678
0.0091*9
0.01516
0.25
0.1*0
12.1*7600
19.92363
282.1*
AVERAGE
-
5JL
MT-
•?*:_
"
-
ILL/
2^
fr-~"
IJF
_
.-__ —
7 18.568
2725.
31*98.
78.9
50.70
91.25
1*3.9
0.01065
0.01892
0.03651
0.061*88
0.00829
0.01U73
0.21*
0.1*1*
12.10506
21.80U12
282.1*
B-31
-------
PLANT: U4MPB
LOCATION: NYC
OPERATOR: ERI
PARTICIPATE SUMMARY IN ENGLISH UNITS
DESCRIPTION
DATE OF RUN
STACK AREA
NET TIME OF RUN
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE
AVG ORIFICE PRES DROP
VOL DRY GAS-METER COND
AVG GAS METER TEMP
VOL DRY GAS-STD COND
TOTAL H20 COLLECTED
VOL H20 VAPOR-STD COND
PERCENT MOISTURE BY VOL
MOLE FRACTION DRY GAS
PERCENT C02 BY VOL, DRY
PERCENT 02 BY VOL, DRY
PERCENT CO BY VOL, DRY
PERCENT N2 BY VOL, DRY
MOLECULAR WT-DRY STK GAS
MOLECULAR WT-STK GAS
AVG STACK TEMPERATURE
NET SAMPLING POINTS
STACK PRESSURE, ABSOLUTE
AVG STACK GAS VELOCITY
STK FLOWRATE, DRY,STD CN
ACTUAL STACK FLOWRATE
PERCENT ISOKINETIC
PARTICULATE NT-PARTIAL
PARTICULATE WT-TOTAL
PERC IMPINGER CATCH
PART. LOAD-PTL,STD CN
PART. LOAD-TTL,STD CN
PART. LOAD-PTL,STD CN @
PART. LOAD-TTL,STD CN @
PART. LOAD-PTL,STK CN
PART. LOAD-TTL,STK CN
UNITS
FT 2
MIN
IN.HG
IN.H20
DCF
DEG.F
DSCF
ML
SCF
PARTIC EMIS-PARTIAL
PARTIC EMIS-TOTAL
PART EMIS/WT PRO FD PTL
PART EMIS/WT PRO FD TTL
PERCENT EXCESS AIR
DEG.F
IN.HG
FPS
DSCFM
ACFM
MG
MG
GR/DSCF
GR/DSCF
12% C02
12% C02
GR/ACF
GR/ACF
LB/HR
LB/HR
LB/TON
LB/TON
1
05-11-73
1.000
60.0
30.06
1.180
32.88
81.6
32. 41
1*7.1
2.23
6.4
0.936
5.4
13.4
0.5
80.7
29.40
28.67
283.0
1
30.06
38.712
1557.
2323.
101.8
71.60
106.90
33.0
0.03U02
0.05080
0.07560
0.11288
0.02279
0.03403
0.45
0.68
17.19870
25.67795
161.3
2
05-11-73
1.000
60.0
30.06
1.139
33.74
82.3
33.21
50.0
2.37
6.7
0.933,
5.4
13.4
0.5
80.7
29.40
28.64
289.0
1
30.06
38.830
1546.
2330.
105.1
79.10
110.90
28.7
0.03668
0.05143
0.08151
0.11428
0.02l»32
0.03410
0.49
0.68
18.40782
25.80818
161.3
AVERAGE
38.771
1551.
2326.
103.4
75.35
108.90
30.8
0.03535
0.05111
0.07856
0.11358
0.02356
0.03406
0.47
0.68
17.80325
25.74306
161.3
B-32
-------
PLANT: U5BPB
LOCATION: NYC
OPERATOR: ERI
PARTICIPATE SUMMARY IN ENGLISH UNITS
DESCRIPTION
DATE OF RUN
STACK AREA
NET TIME OF RUN
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE
AVG ORIFICE PRES DROP
VOL DRY GAS-METER COND
AVG GAS METER TEMP
VOL DRY GAS-STD CONn
TOTAL H20 COLLECTED
VOL H20 VAPOR-STD COND
PERCENT MOISTURE BY VOL
MOLE FRACTION DRY GAS
PERCENT C02 BY VOL, DRY
PERCENT 02 BY VOL, DRY
PERCENT CO BY VOL, DRY
PERCENT N2 BY VOL, DRY
MOLECULAR WT-DRY STK GAS
MOLFCULAR WT-STK GAS
AVG STACK TEMPERATURE
NET SAMPLING POINTS
STACK PRESSURE, ABSOLUTE
AVG STACK GAS VELOCITY
STK FLOWRATE, DRY,STD CN
ACTUAL STACK FLOWRATE
PERCENT ISOKINETIC
PARTICULATE WT-PARTIAL
PARTICULATE WT-TOTAL
PERC IMPINGER CATCH
PART. LOAD-PTL,STD CN
PART. LOAD-T 1,STD CN
PART. LOAD-PTL,STD CN @
PART. LOAD-TTL,STD CN @
PART. LOAD-PTL,STK CN
PART. LOAD-TTL,STK CN
PARTIC EMIS-PARTIAL
UNI
FT2
MIN
IN.HG
IN.H20
DCF
DEG.F
DSCF
ML
SCF
PARTIC EMIS-TOTAL
PART EMIS/WT PRO FD
PART EMIS/WT PRO FD
PERCENT EXCESS AIR
PTL
T 1
DEG.F
IN.HG
FPS
DSCFM
ACFM
MG
MG
GR/DSCF
GR/DSCF
12% C02
12% C02
GR/ACF
GR/ACF
LB/HR
LB/HR
LB/TON
LB/TON
1
05-22-73
1.000
60.0
29.61*
1.101
33.1*8
86.6
32.21*
51.7
2.i»5
7.1
0.929
l*.i*
13.1*
0.0
82.2
29.21*
28. U5
262.0
1
29. 6U
37.667
1527.
2260.
103.2
379.1*0
1*08.50
7.1
0.18121
0.19511
0.1*91*22
0.53213
0.12237
0.13176
2.37
2.55
71.22878
76.69205
161.1*
2
05-22-73
1.000
60.0
29.61*
1.083
31.82
82.6
30.87
55.5
2.63
7.9
0.921
l*.l*
13.1*
0.0
82.2
29.21*
28.36
262.0
1
29.61*
37.808
1520.
2268.
99.3
1*37.80
1*69.10
6.7
0.2181*0
0.231*02
0.59561*
0.63823
0.11*621*
0.15669
2.85
3.05
85.U3750
91.51*576
161.1*
AVERAGE
37.737
1523.
2261*.
101.3
1*08.60
1*38.80
6.9
0.19981
0.211*56
0.51*1*93
0.58518
0.131*31
0.11*1*23
2.61
2.80
78.33313
81*. 11890
161.1*
B-33
-------
PLANT: A1MHI
LOCATION: NYC
OPERATOR: ERI
PARTICULATE SUMMARY IN ENGLISH UNITS
DESCRIPTION
DATE OF RUN
STACK AREA
NET TIME OF RUN
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE
AVG ORIFICE PRES DROP
VOL DRY GAS-METER COND
AVG GAS METER TEMP
VOL DRY GAS-STD CONP
TOTAL H20 COLLECTED
VOL H20 VAPOR-STD COND
PERCENT MOISTURE BY VOL
MOLE FRACTION DRY HAS
PERCENT C02 BY VOL, DRY
PERCENT 02 BY VOL, DRY
PERCENT CO BY VOL, DRY
PERCENT M2 RY VOL, DRY
MOLECULAR WT-DRY STK GAS
MOLECULAR WT-STK GAS
AVG STACK TEMPERATURE
NET SAMPLING POINTS
STACK PRESSURE, ABSOLUTE
AVG STACK GAS VELOCITY
STK FLOWRATE, DRY,STD CN
ACTUAL STACK FLOWRATE
PERCENT ISOKIMETIC
PARTICULATE WT-PARTIAL
PARTI CULATE h'T-TOTAL
PERC IMPINGER CATCH
LOAD-PTL,STD CN
LOAD-TTL,STD CN
LOAD-PTL,STD CN @
LOAD-TTL,STD CN @
LOAD-PTL,STK PN
LOAD-TTL,STK CN
PARTIC EMIS-PARTIAL
PARTIC EMIS-TOTAL
PART SMIS/WT PRD FD PTL
PART EMIS/WT PRO FD TTL
PERCENT EXCESS AIR
UNITS 123 AVERAGE
06-08-73 06-08-73 06-08-73
PART.
PART.
PART.
PART.
PART.
PART.
FT2
M 1 N
i K.HG
IN.H20
DCF
DEG.F
DSCF
ML
SCF
DEG.F
: IN. HP
FPS
1 DSCFM
ACFM
MC
MG
GR/DSCF
GR/DSCF
12% C02
12% C02
GR/ACF
GR/ACC
IB/HP.
LB/HR
LB/TOf!
LB/TON
1.000
61*. 0
30.00
0.923
31*. 11
102. k
32.30
56.1*
2.67
7.6
0.921;
0.8
11*. 6
0.0
81*. 6
28.71
27.89
11*3.0
1
30.00
11*. 010
621*.
8M.
96.2
171.10
266.60
35.8
0.08159
0.12712
1.22378
1.90681*
0.06635
0.10339
O.U8
0.75
1*5.55826
70.9S683
188.8
1.000
61*. 0
30.00
2.180
1*8.1*9
111.3
1*5.33
87.1
<».13
8.3
0.917
0.8
11*. 6
0.0
81*. 6
28.71
27.82
227.0
1
30.00
23.700
1008.
11*22.
91.6
71*. 50
183.20
59.3
0.02531
0.06221*
0.37963
0.93351*
0.01793
0.01*1*09
0.22
0.51*
8.25113
20.2900**
188.8
1.000
61*. 0
30.00
2.920
57.71*
109.1
51*. 29
72.0
3.1*1
5.9
0.91*1
0.8
11*. 6
0.0
81*. 6
28.71
28.08
296.0
1
30.00
29.1*1*0
116R.
1766.
91*. 7
191*. 20
326.10
1*0.1*
0.05509
0.09251
0.82637
1.38763
0.0361*1
0.06113
0.55
0.93
8.55092
11*. 35868
1S8.8
22.381*
953.
131*3.
91*. 2
11*6.60
258.63
1*5.2
0.05UOO
0.09396
0.80993
1.1*0931*
0.01*023
0.06951*
0.1*2
0.71*
20.78676
35.21181*
188.8
B-34
-------
PLANT: A2BHI
LOCATION: NYC
OPERATOR: ER!
PARTICULAR SUMMARY IN ENGLISH UNITS
DESCRIPTION
DATE OF RUN
STACK AREA
MET TIME OF RUN
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE
AVG ORIFICE PRES P
VOL DRY GAS-METER
AVG GAS METER TEMP
VOL DRY GAS-STD CO
TOTAL H20 COLLECTED
VOL H20 VAPOR-STD
PERCENT MOISTURE BY
MOLE FRACTION DRY
PERCENT C02 BY VOL,
PERCENT 02 BY VOL,
PERCENT CO BY VOL,
PERCENT N2 BY VOL,
MOLECULAR NT-DRY S
MOLECULAR WT-STK G
AVG STACK TEMPERATURE
NET SAMPLING POINTS
STACK PRESSURE, j
AVG STACK GAS VFLOC
STK FLOK'RATE, ORY,
ACTUAL STACK FLOWR
PERCENT ISOKINETIC
PARTICULATE NT-PAR
PARTICULATE NT-TOTAL
PERC IMPINGER CATCH
PART. LOAP-PTL,STD
PART. LOAn-TTL,STD
PART. LOAP-PTL,STD
PART. LPAP-TTL,STD
PART. LOAP-PTL,STK
PART. LOAP-TTL,STK
PART 1C EM IS-PARTIAL
PART 1C EMIS-TOTAL
PART EMIS/V/T PRO FO
PART EMIS/V/T PRO FD
PERCENT EXCESS AIR
UN ITS 1 2
06-18-73 06-18-73
AVERAGE
E
ROP
coNn
MD
D
CONO
Y VOL
3AS
, PRY
PRY
DRY
DRY
fK GAS
\S
JRE
*
vOLUTE
:ITY
;TP CM
VTE
riAL
\L
i
CN
CN
CN (9
CN (3
CN
CN
1 PTL
) TTL
FT2
MIN
1 N . HG
IN.H20
DCF
DEG.F
DSCF
ML
SCF
DEG.F
IN. HG
FPS
DSCFM
ACFM
MO
MR
GR/DSCF
GR/DSCF
12* CO?
11% CO?
GR/ACF
GR/ACF
LB-/HR
LR/HR
LB/TOM
LB/TON
1.000
S6.0
30.00
1.2lf8
33.21
94. R
31.90
37.3
1.77
5.3
0.9fj7
1.2
19. '3
0.1
79. 'i
28.96
28.39
239.0
1
30.00
3tt. 281*
U81.
2057.
112.8
99.80
213.70
53.3
0.0/t819
0.30318
0.48186
1.03179
0.03U68
0.0.7'»26
0.61
1.31
9.m309
20.15608
112U.7
1.000
56.0
30.00
1.319
35.92
8^.8
35.1U
•39.8
, 1.89
5.1
0.9^9
1.8
18.5
0.1
79.6
29.03
28.1*7
214.0
1
30.00
U0.216
1805.
2413.
102.0
156.30
255.40
38.8
0.06849
0.11192
0./t5661
0.7U612
0.05121
0.08368
1.06
1.73
13.16512
21.51230
719.5
37.250
1643.
2235.
107.4
128.05
234.55
46.1
0.05834
0.10755
0.46923
0.88896
0.04295
0.07897
0.84
1.52
11.28911
20.834-18
922.1
B-35
-------
PLANT: B1RHI
LOCATION: NYC
OPERATOR: ERI
PARTICULATE SUMMARY IN ENGLISH UMITS
DESCRIPTION
DATE OF RUN
STACK AREA
NET TIME OF RUW
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE
AVG ORIFICE PRES DROP
VOL DRY GAS-METER COND
AVG GAS METER TEMP
VOL ORY GAS-STD COND
TOTAL H20 COLLECTED
VOL H20 VAPOR-STD COND
PERCENT MOISTURE BY VOL
MOLE FRACTION DRY GAS
PERCENT C02 BY VOL, DRY
PERCENT 02 BY VOL, DRY
PERCENT CO BY VOL, DRY
PERCENT N2 BY VOL,^DRY
MOLECULAR WT-ORY STK GAS
MOLECULAR WT-STK GAS
AVG STACK TEMPERATURE
NET SAMPLING POINTS
STACK PRESSURE, ABSOLUTE
AVG STACK GAS VELOCITY
STK FLOWRATE, DRY,STD CN
ACTUAL STACK FLOWRATE
PERCENT ISOKINETIC
PARTICULATE WT-PARTIAL
PARTICULATE WT-TOTAL
PERC IMPINGER CATCH
LOAD-PTL,STD CN
LOAD-TTL,STO CN
LOAD-PTL,STD
UNITS
MIN
I M. HG
IN.H20
DCF
OEG.F
DSCF
ML
SCF
PART
PART
PAP.T
PART
PART
CN @
LOAD-TTL,STD CN @
LOAD-PTL,STK CN
PART. LOAD-TTL,STK CN
PARTIC EMIS-PARTIAL
PARTIC EMIS-TOTAL
PART EMIS/WT PRO FD PTL
PART EMIS/WT PRD FD TTL
PERCENT EXCESS AIR
DEG.F
IN.HG
FPS
DSCFM
ACFM
NO
MG
GR/DSCF
GR/DSCF
12* C02
12* C02
GR/ACF
GR/ACF
LB/HR
LB/HR
LB/TON
LB/TON
3
OF-n2-73
1.000
56.0
30.05
1.273
32.11
81.3
31.67
36.1
1.71
5.1
0.949
3.2
16.4
0.0
80.4
29.17
28.60
241.0
1
30.05
16.567
716.
994.
103.0
163.00
282.30
42.3
0.07925
0.13725
0.29719
0.51470
0.05705
0.09880
0.4-9
0.84
14.09719
24.41496
339.9
2
06-02-73
i.ooo
56.0
30.05
1.480
35.67
92.7
34.47
32.0
1.5.2
4.2
0.958
2.2
17.6
0.0
80.2
29.06
28.59
235.0
1
30.05
17.042
750.
1023.
107.0
293.50
471.40
37.7
0.13112
0.21059
0.71518
1.14868
0.09612
0.15437
0.84
1.35
27.63571
44.38663
492.5
AVERAGE
16.805
733.
1008.
105.0
228.25
376.85
40.0
0.10518
0.17392
0.50619
0.83169
0.07658
0.12659
0.66
1.10
20.86644
34.40079
416.2
B-36
-------
PLANT: B2BHI
LOCATION: NYC
OPERATOR: ERI
PARTICIPATE SUMMARY IN ENGLISH UNITS
DESCRIPTION UNITS
DATE OF RUN
STACK AREA FT?
MET TIME OF RUN MIN
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE IM.HG
AVG ORIFICE PRES DROP IN.H?0
VOL DRY GAS-METER COND DCF
AVG GAS METER TEMP DEG.F'
VOL DRY GAS-STD COND DSCF
TOTAL M20 COLLECTED ML
VOL H20 VAPOR-STO COND SCF
PERCENT MOISTURE BY VOL
MOLE FRACTION DRY GAS
PERCENT C02 BY VOL, DRY
PERCENT 02 BY VOL, DRY
PERCENT CO BY VOL, DRY
PERCENT N2 BY VOL, DRY
MOLECULAR WT-DRY STK GAS
MOLECULAR WT-STK GAS
AVG STACK TEMPERATURE DEG.F
NET SAMPLING POINTS
STACK PRESSURE, ABSOLUTE IN.HG
AVG STACK GAS VELOCITY FPS
STK FLOWRATE, DRY,STD CN DSCFM
ACTUAL STACK FLOHRATE ACFM
PERCENT ISOKIHETIC
PARTICULATE WT-PARTIAL MG
PARTICULATE WT-TOTAI. MG
PERC IMPINGER CATCH
PART. LOAD-PTl,STD CN GR/nsCF
PART. LOAD-TTL,STn CM GR/OSCF
PART. LOAn-PTL,STn CN F) 12% CO?
PART. LOAD-TTL,STD CN (3 12?^ CO?
PART. LOAD-PTL,STK CN " GR/ACF
PART. LOAD-TTL,STK CN GR/ACF
PARTIC EMIS-PARTIAL LB/HR
PARTIC EMIS-TOTAL LB/HR
PART EMIS/WT PRD FD PTL LB/TON
PART EMIS/WT PRD FD TTL LB/TON
PERCENT EXCESS AIR
1
05-31-73
1.000
U9.0
29.61
0.6Z1
22.28
86.3
21. U2
16.9
0.80
3.6
0.96U
0.7
18.9
0.1
80.3
28.87
28.48
170.0
1
29.61
2U.111
1161.
Ihk7.
110.5
110.00
191.90
42.7
0.07908
0,13796
1.35565
2.36499
0.063M
0.11063
0.79
1.37
34.96880
61.00i»62
802. k
2
05-31-73
1.000
56.0
29.61
2.U48
l»3.61
97.2
U1.29
»*8.5
2.30
5.3
0.9U7
0.7
18.9
0.1
80.3
28.87
28.29
207.0
1
29.61
21. W
958.
1286.
100. U
31U.UO
U26.60
26.3
0.11727
0.15912
2.01031
2.72773
0.08728
0.118«f3
0.96
1.31
28.7W9
38.99849
802.4
3
05-31-73
1.000
56.0
29.61
2.020
42.02
92.6
40.07
48.5
2.30
5.4
0.946
0.7
18.9
0.1
80.3
28.87
28.28
194.0
1
29.61
19.932
907.
1196.
102.9
234.80
402.00
41.6
0.09024
0.15450
1.54699
2.64,860
0.06839
0.11710
0.70
1.20
20.33263
34.81140
802.4
AVERAGE
21.827
1009.
1310.
104.6
219.73
340.17
36.9
0.09553
0.15053
1.63765
2.58044
0.07303
0.11539
0.82
1.29
28.01430
44.93816
802.4
B-37
-------
PLANT: B3MHI
LOCATION: NYC
OPERATOR: FRI
PARTICULATE SUMMARY IN ENGLISH UNITS
DESCRIPTION
DATE OF RUN
UNITS
STACK AREA FT2
NET TIME OF RUN MIN
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE IN. KG
AVG ORIFICE PRES DROP IN.H20
VOL DRY GAS-METER COND DCF
AVG CAS METER TEMP DEG.F
VOL DRY GAS-STD COND DSCF
TOTAL H20 COLLECTED ML
VOL H20 VAPOR-STD COND SCF
PERCENT MOISTURE BY VOL
MOLE FRACTION DRY GAS
PERCENT C02 BY VOL, DRY
PERCENT 02 BY VOL, DRY
PERCENT CO BY VOL, PRY
PERCENT N2 BY VOL, DRY
MOLECULAR WT-DRY STK GAS
MOLECULAR WT-STK GAS
AVG STACK TEMPERATURE DEG.F
NET SAMPLING POINTS
STACK PRESSURE, ABSOLUTE IN.HG
AVC STACK GAS VELOCITY FPS
STK FLOWRATE, DRY,STD CN DSCFM
ACTUAL STACK FLOWRATE ACFf
PERCENT ISOKINETIC
PARTICULATE WT-PARTIAL MC
PARTICULATE WT-TOTAL MG
PERC IMPINGER CATCH
PART. LOAD-PTL,STD CN GR/PSCF
PART. LOAD-TTL,STD CN GR/DSCF
PART. LOAD-PTL,STD CN 3 12* C02
PART. LOAD-TTL,STD CN @ 12% C02
PART. LOAD-PTL,STK CM GR/ACF
PART. LOAD-TTL,STK CN GR/ACF
PARTIC EMIS-PARTIAL LB/HR
PARTIP EMIS-TOTAL LB/HR
PART EMIS/WT PRO FD PTL LB/TON
PART EMIS/WT PRO FD TTL LB/TON'
PERCENT EXCESS AIR
1
OG-28-73
1.000
61*. 0
29.86
5.058
33.95
100.1
32. 1*5
32.0
1.52
k.5
0.955
1.3
19.5
0.1
79.1
28.99
28.50
192.0
1
29.86
15.107
702.
906.
91*. 1
150.70
2b8.80
1*3.9
0.07151
0.12755
0.66009
1.17739
0.05538
0.09878
0.1*3
0.77
11.32873
20.20679
1357.9
2
06-28-73
1.000
61*. 0
29.86
2.075
1*7.50
106.5
I* l*. 57
U9.5
2.35
5.0
0.950
1.7
18.8
0.0
79.5
29.02
28.1*7
228.0
1
29.86
22.676
993.
1361.
91. I*
198.60
380.50
1*7.8
0.06863
0.1311*8
0.1*81*1*1
0.92809
0.05008
0.09595
0.58
1.12
11*. 791* 1*0
28. 31* 1*76
859.2
3
06-28-73
1.000
61*. 0
29.82
1.510
1*3. U9
102.2
1*1.01
33.3
1.58
3.7
0.963
1.6
18.7
0.0
79.7
29.00
28.60
187.0
1
29.82
17.987
81*8.
1079.
98.5
356.20
1*92.60
27.7
0.13376
0.181*99
1.0032«»
1.387U1
0.10508
0.11*532
0.97
1.35
38.11+012
52.71*518
798.9
AVERAGE
18.590
81*8.
1115.
9«»./
235.17
380.63
39.8
0.09130
0.11*801
0.71591
1.161*30
0.07018
0.11335
O.C6
1.08
21.U2108
33.76556
1005.3
B-38
-------
PLANT: RUM. PI
LOCATION: NYC
OPERATOR: ER!
PART ICULATE SUMMARY IN ENGLISH UNITS
DESCRIPTION
DATE OF RUN
STACK AREA
NET TIMF OF RUN
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE
AVG ORIFICE PRES DROP
VOL DRY OAS-METER COND
AVG GAS METER TEMP
VOL DRY CAS-STD COND
TOTAL H20 COLLECTED
VOL H2.0 VAPOR-STD COND
PERCENT M.OISTURE BY VOL
MOLE FRACTION DRY GAS
PERCENT C02 BY VOL, DRY
PERCENT 02 BY VOL, DRY
PERCENT TO BY VOL, DRY
PERCENT K2 PY VOL, DRY
MOLECULAR V/T-DRY STK GAS
MOLECULAR WT-STK GAS
AVG STACK TEMPERATURE
NET SAMPLING POINTS
STACK PRESSURE, ABSOLUTE
AVG STACK HAS VELOCITY
STK FLOWRATE, DRY,STD CN
ACTUAL STACK FLOWRATE
PERCENT ISOKINETIC
PARTI CULATE WT-PARTIAL
PARTI CULATE WT-TOTAL
PERC IMPINGER CATCH
PART. LOAD-PTL,STD CN
PART. LOAD-TTL, STD CN
PART. LOAD-PTL,STD CN @
PART. LOAD-TTL, STD CM @
PART. LOAD-PTL,STK CN
PART. LOAD-TTL, STK CN
PARTI C EMI S-PAR'TI AL
UNITS
FT2
MIN
IN.HG
IN.H20
DCF
DEG.F
DSCF
ML
SCF
PARTI C EMIS-TOTAL
PART EMIS/UT PRO FD PTL
PART EMIS/WT PRD FD TTL
PERCENT EXCESS AIR
DEG.F
IN.HG
FPS
DSCFM
ACFM
MG
MG
OR/DSCF
GR/DSCF
12% C02
12% T02
GR/ACF
GR/ACF
LB/HR
LB/HR
LB/TON
LB/TON
1
05-30-73
1.000
56.0
29.60
6.950
77.39
111*. 5
71.83
71.0
3.37
l*. 5
0.955
1.8
17.6
0.1
80.5
28.99
28.50
132.0'
1
29.60
20.723
1052.
12U3.
89.5
155.1*0
230.00'
32.1*
0.03332
0.01*931
0.22210
0.32872
0.02816
O.OU68
0.30
0.1*1;
8.58102
12.70035
1*74.1
1*
05-30-73
1.000
56.0
29.58
i*.250
62.50
113.1*
57.70
77. U
3.67
6.0
0.9UO
1.8
17.6
0.1
80.5
28.99
28.33
169.0
1
29.58
28.7UI*
1350.
1725.
99.5
71*. 70
11*3.00
1*7.8
0.01991*
0.03816
0.13291
0.25UU3
0.01560
0.02987
0.23
O.Ul*
1*. 12098
7.88890
U7U.1
AVERAGE
2U.733
1201.
1U8U.
94.5
115.05
186.50
1*0.1
0.02663
O.OU371*
0.17750
0.29157
0.02188
0.03578
0.27
O.lji*
6.35100
10.29462
1*71*. 1
B-39
-------
PLANT: B5BHI
LOCATION: NYC
OPERATOR: ERI
PARTICULATE SUMMARY IN ENGLISH UNITS
DESCRIPTION
DATE OF RUN
UNITS 123 AVERAGE
06-07-73 06-07-75 06-07-73
STACK AREA
NET TIME OF RUN
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE
AVG ORIFICE PRES DROP
VOL DRY GAS-METER COND
AVG GAS METER TEMP
VOL DRY GAS-STD COND
TOTAL H20 COLLECTED
VOL H20 VAPOR-STD COND
PERCENT MOISTURE BY VOL
MOLE FRACTION DRY GAS
PERCENT C02 BY VOL, DRY
PERCENT 02 BY VOL/ DRY
PERCENT CO BY VOL, DRY
PERCENT N2 BY VOL, DRY
MOLECULAR WT-DRY STK GAS
MOLECULAR WT-STK GAS
AVG STACK TEMPERATURE
NET SAMPLING POINTS
STACK PRESSURE, ABSOLUTE
AVG STACK GAS VELOCITY
STK FLOWRATE, DRY, STD CN
ACTUAL STACK FLOWRATE
PERCENT ISOKINETIC
PARTI CULATE WT-PARTIAL
PARTI CULATE WT-TOTAL
PERC IMPINGER CATCH-
PART. LOAD-PTL,STD CN
PART. LOAD-TTL,STD CN
PART. LOAD-PTL,STD CN @
PART. LOAD-TTL,STD CN @
PART. LOAD-PTL,STK CN
PART. LOAD-TTL,STK CN
PARTI C EMIS-PARTIAL
PARTI C EMIS-TOTAL
PART FMIS/WT PRO FD PTL
PART EMIS/WT PRO FD TTL
PERCENT EXCESS AIR
FT2
MIN
IN.HG
IN.H20
DCF
DEG.F
DSCF
ML
SCF
DEG.F
• FN.HG
FPS
DSCFM
ACFM
MG
MG
GR/DSCF
GR/DSCF
12% C02
12% C02
GR/ACF
GR/ACF
LB/HR
LB/HR
LB/TON
LB/TON
1.000
61*. 0
29;90'
3.225
59.10
95.5
56.79
52.5
2.49
k.2
0.958
l.U
18 . 7
0.2
79.7
28.97
28.51
281.0
1
29.90
30.011
1233.
1801.
93.9
173.80
358.50
51.5
0.0^713
0.09722
O.UOUOO
0.83333
0.03225
0.06652
0.50
1.03
30.1SU33
62.26169
762.0
1.000
6U. 0
29.90
l*. 108
65.72
100.2
62.75
89.7
U.25
6.3
0.937
2.1*
17. k
0.2
80.0
29.08
28.38
331.0
1
29.90
31*. 976
1316.
2099.
97.2
207.30
511.20
59. k
0.05088
0.125U6
0.25438
0.62731
0.03188
0.07861
0.57
1.U1
10.6251*6
26.20227
U52.9
1.000
6U.O
29.90
5.81*1*
77.85
103.6
71*. 19
92.'0
i*.36
5.6
0.91*1*
1.5
18.2
0.2
80.1
28.97
28.36
370.0
1
29.90
l*l*. 339
1603.
2660.
9U. 3
1*13.30
82U.90
U9.9
0.08579
0.17123
0.6863«*
1.369S6
0.05167
0.10312
1.18
2.35
22.03U33
1*3.97803
59U.1
36.U«*2
138U.
2187.
95.1
261*. 80
56U. 87
53.6
0.06127
0.13131
O.U«*82U
0.9U350
0.03860
0.08275
0.75
1.60
20.9U803
Ul*. 1U731
603.0
B-40
-------
PLANT: C1MPI
LOCATION: NYC
OPERATOR: ERI
PARTICULATE SUMMARY IN ENGLISH UNITS
DESCRIPTION UNITS
DATE OF RUN
STACK AREA FT2
NET TIME OF RUN MIN
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE IN.HG
AVG ORIFICE PRES DROP IN.H20
VOL DRY GAS-METER COND DCF
AVG GAS METER TEMP DEG.F
VOL DRY GAS-STD CONP DSCF
TOTAL H20 COLLECTED ML
VOL H20 VAPOR-STD COND SCF
PERCENT MOISTURE BY VOL
MOLE FRACTION DRY GAS
PERCENT C02 BY VOL, DRY
PERCENT 02 BY VOL, DRY
PERCENT CO PY VOL, DRY
PERCENT N2 BY VOL, DRY
MOLECULAR WT-DRY STK GAS
MOLECULAR WT-STK GAS
AVG STACK TEMPERATURE DEG.F
NET SAMPLING POINTS
STACK PRESSURE, ABSOLUTE TN.HG
AVG STACK GAS VELOCITY FPS
STK FLOWRATE, DRY,STD CN DSCFM
ACTUAL STACK FLOWRATE ACFM
PERCENT ISOKINETIC
PARTICULATE WT-PARTIAL MG
PARTICULATE WT-TOTAL MG
PERC IMPINGER CATCH
PART. LOAD-PTL,STD CN GR/DSCF
PART. LOAD-TTL,STD CN GR/DSCF
PART. LOAD-PTL,STD CN @ 12% C02
PART. LOAD-TTL,STD CN @ 12% C02
PART. LOAD-PTL,STK CN GR/ACF
PART. LOAD-TTL,STK CN GR/ACF
PARTIC EMIS-PARTIAL LB/HR
PARTI C ElllS-TOTAL LB/HR
PART EMIS/WT PRO FD PTL LB/TON
PART EMIS/WT PRD FD TTL LB/TON
PERCENT EXCESS AIR
1
05-23-73
1.000
U8.0
29.66
3.362
I* I*. 11
98.0
1*1.87
30.0
1.1*2
3.3
0.967
l.U
19.2
0.0
79.1*
28.99
28.63
218.0
1
29.66
11*. 900
670.
89U.
95.5
323.80
1*88.90
33.8
0.11911
0.17981*
1.02092
1.51*11*8
0.08920
0.131*68
0.68
1.03
32.56665
1*9.17180
1089.9
2
05-23-73
1.000
U8.0
29.66
1.868
31.28
99.3
29.52
39.0
1.85
5.9
0.91*1
l.t*
19.2
0.0
79.U
28.99
28.31*
188.0
1
29.66
10.673
1*88.
61*0.
92.3
161.80
369.00
56.2
0.08UU2
0.19253
0.72360
1.65021*
0.061*36
0.1U678
0.35
0.81
13.3387U
30.1*2023
1089.9
3
05-23-73
1.000
1*8.0
29.66
1.81*8
39.91
103.8
37.35
23.2
1.10
2.9
0.971
1.1*
19.2
0.0
79.U
28.99
28.68
197.0
1
29.66
11.1*30
533.
686.
107.2
119.50
201*. 1*0
1*1.5
0.01*927
0.081*27
0.1*2229
0.72232
0.0382U
0.065U1
0.22
0.38
9.99677
17.09906
1089.9
AVERAGE
12.331*
561*.
7UO.
98.3
201.70
35U. 10
1*3.8
0.081*27
0.15221
0. 72227
1.30U68
0.06393
0.11562
0.1*2
0.71+
18.63U05
32.23035
1089.9
B-41
-------
PLANT: B5EHI
LOCATION: NYC
OPERATOR: ERI
PARTICULATE SUMMARY IN ENGLISH UNITS
DESCRIPTION
DATE OF RUN
STACK AREA
NET TIME OF RUN
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE
AVG ORIFICE PRES DROP
VOL DRY GAS-METER COND
AVG GAS METER TEMP
VOL DRY GAS-STD COND
TOTAL H20 COLLECTED
VOL H20 VAPOR-STD COND
PERCENT MOISTURE BY VOL
MOLE FRACTION DRY GAS
PERCENT C02 BY VOL, DRY
PERCENT 02 BY VOL, DRY
PERCENT CO BY VOL, DRY
PERCENT N2 BY VOL, DRY
MOLECULAR WT-DRY STK GAS
MOLECULAR WT-STK GAS
AVG STACK TEMPERATURE
NET SAMPLING POINTS
STACK PRESSURE, ABSOLUTE
AVG STACK GAS VELOCITY
STK FLOWRATE, DRY,STD CN
ACTUAL STACK FLOWRATE
PERCENT ISOKINETIC
PARTICULATE WT-PARTIAL
PARTICULATE WT-TOTAL
PERC IMPINGER CATCH
LOAD-PTL,STD CN
LOAD-TTL,STD CN
LOAD-PTL,STD CN @
UNITS
FT2
WIN
IK.HG
IN.H20
DCF
DEG.F
DSCF
ML
SCF
PART
PART
PART
PART
PART
PART
DEG.F
I N. HG
FPS
DSCFM
ACFM
MG
MG
GR/DSCF
GR/DSCF
C02
LOAD-TTL,STD CN @ 12% C02
LOAD-PTL,STK CN GR/ACF
LOAD-TTL,STK CN GR/ACF
PARTIC EMIS-PARTIAL LB/HR
PARTIC EMIS-TOTAL LB/HR
PART EMIS/WT PRO FD PTL LB/TON
PART EMIS/WT PRO FD TTL LB/TOK
PERCENT EXCESS AIR
1
06-07-73
1.000
61*. 0
29.90
3.225
59.10
95.5
56.79
52.5
2.49
1*.2
0.958
l.U
18.7
0.2
79.7
28.97
28.51
281.0
1
29.90
30.011
1233.
1801.
93.9
173.80
358.50
51.5
O.OU713
0.09722
0.1*01+00
0.83333
0.03225
0.06652
0.50
1.03
30.18U35
62.26169
762.0
2
06-07-73
1.000
61*. 0
29.90
1+.108
65.72
100.2
62.75
89.7
I*. 25
6.3
0.937
2.U
17.it
0.2
80.0
29.08
28.38
331.0
1
29.90
31*. 976
1316.
2099.
97.2
207.30
511.20
59.1*
0.05088
0.125U6
0.251*38
O.G2731
0.03188
0.07861
0.57
1.U1
10.6251*6
26.20227
1*52.9
3
06-07-73
1.000
6U. 0
29.90
5.8i*U
77.85
103.6
71*. 19
92.0
i*.36
5.6
0.91*1*
1.5
18.2
0.2
80.1
28.97
28.36
370.0
1
29.90
1*1*. 339
1603.
2660.
91*. 3
1*13.30
821*. 90
U9.9
0.08579
0.17123
0.68631+
1.369S6
0.05167
0.10312
1.18
2.35
22.031*33
1*3.97803
591*. 1
AVERAGE
36.1*1*2
1381*.
2187.
95.1
261*. 80
561*. 87
53.6
0.06127
0.13131
0.1*1*821*
0.91*350
0.03860
0.08275
0.75
1.60
20.91*803
1*1*. 11*731
603.0
B-40
-------
PLANT: C3MPI
LOCATION: NYC
OPERATOR: ERI
PARTICULATE SUMMARY IN ENGLISH UNITS
PESCRIPTION
*DATE OF RUN
STACK AREA
.NET TIME OF RUN
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE
AVG ORIFICE PRES D
WOL DRY GAS-METER
AVG GAS METER TEMP
VOL DRY GAS-STD CO
TOTAL H20 COLLECTED
VOL H20 VAPOR-STD
PERCENT MOISTURE RY
MOLE FRACTION DRY G
PERCENT C02 BY VOL,
PERCENT 02 BY VOL,
PERCENT CO BY VOL,
PERCENT N2 BY VOL,
MOLECULAR WT-DRY ST
MOLECULAR WT-STK GA
AVG STACK TEMPERATURE
NET SAMPLING POINTS
STACK PRESSURE, AB
AVG STACK GAS VELO
STK FLOWRATE/ DRY,
ACTUAL STACK FLOWR
PERCENT ISOKINETIC
PART ICULATE WT-PAR
PARTICULATE WT-TOTAL
PERC IMPINGER CATCH
PART. LOAD-PTL,STD
PART. LOAD-TTL,STD
•PART. LOAD-PTL,STD
PART. LOAD-TTL,STD
PART. LOAD-PTL,STK
PART. LOAD-TTL,STK
PARTIC EMIS-PARTIAL
PART 1C EMIS-TOTAL
PART EMIS/WT PRD FD
PART EMIS/WT PRD FD
PERCENT EXCESS AIR
UNITS
AVERAGE
05-2U-73 05-2U-73 05-2U-73
*OP
:OND
^D
)
:OND
f VOL
3AS
, DRY
DRY
DRY
DRY
FK GAS
^S
JRE
50LUTE
:ITY
5TD CN
ME
"IAL
VL
1
CN
CN
CN @
CN @
CN
CN
> PTL
I TTL
FT2
MIN
1 N.HG
IN.H20
DCF
DEG.F
DSCF
ML
SCF
DEG.F
IN.HG
FPS
DSCFM
ACFM
MG
MG
GR/DSCF
GR/DSCF
125 C02
12% C02
GR/ACF
GR/ACF
LB/HR
LB/HR
LB/TON
LB/TON
1.000
56.0
29.63
2.U93
1*1*. 48
86.3
1*2.99
22. I*
1.06
2.U
0.976
0.1
20.2
0.0
79.7
28.82
28.56
100.0
1
29.63
11.107
609.
666.
92. k
179.80
363.90
50.6
0.061*1*1
0.13037
7.729C9
15.6UU23
0.05887
0.11915
0.31*
0.68
19.22636
38.91255
1.000
56.0
29.63
1.61*0
31*. 85
85.7
33.65
21.3
1.01
2.9
0.971
0.0
20.3
0.0
79.7
28.81
. 28.50
157.0
1
29.63
16.370
811.
982.
96.6
193.90
293.50
33.9
0.08875 0
0. 13U33 0
1.000
56.0
29.63
1.601
36.57
90.5
35.00
1*5.5
2.16
5.8
0.91*2
0.0
20.3
0.0
79.7
28.81
28.18
173.0
1
29.63
17.273
809.
1036.
100.7
339.90
513.60
33.8
.14955
.22598
11*. 917
71*3.
895.
96.6
237.87
390.33
39. 1*
0.10090
0.16356
******************************
**************
0.0732U 0
0.11086 0
0.62
0.93
17.62706 2k
26.68150 37
*******
.11672
.17636
1.01*
1.57
.70020
.32286
*********
0.08291*
0.1351*6
0.66
1.06
20.51787
31*. 30562
21*02.
r******************
B-43
-------
PLANT: C4BPI
LOCATION: NYC
OPERATOR: ERI
PART ICULATE SUMMARY IN ENGLISH UNITS
DESCRIPTION
DATE OF RUN
STACK AREA
NET TIME OF RUN
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE
AVG ORIFICE PRES P
VOL DRY GAS-METER
AVG GAS METER TEMP
VOL PRY GAS-STD CO
TOTAL H20 COLLECTED
VOL H20 VAPOR-STD
PERCENT MOISTURE BY
MOLE FRACTION DRY
PERCENT C02 BY VOL,
PERCENT 02 BY VOL,
PERCENT CO BY VOL,
PERCENT N2 DY VOL,
MOLECULAR WT-DRY S
MOLECULAR WT-STK G
AVG STACK TEMPERATURE
NET SAMPLING POINTS
STACK PRESSURE, AB
AVG STACK GAS VELO
STK FLOWRATE, DRY,
ACTUAL STACK FLOWR
PERCENT ISOKINETIC
PARTICULATE WT-PAR
PARTICULATE WT-TOTAL
PERC IMPINGER CATCH
PART. LOAD-PTL,STD
PART. LOAD-TTL,STD
PART. LOAD-PTL,STD
PART. LOAP-TTL,STD
PART. LOAD-PTL,STK
PART. LOAD-TTL,STK
PART 1C EMIS-PARTIAL
PARTIC EMIS-TOTAL
PART EMIS/WT PRO FT
PART EMIS/WT PRO FD
PERCENT EXCESS AIR
UNITS 1 2
06-19-73 06-19-73
AVERAGE
E
ROP
COND
ND
D
CONP
V VOL
3AS
, DRY
DRY
DRY
DRY
FK GAS
\S
JRE
•»
SOLUTE
:ITY
>TD CN
\TE
flAL
\l
]
CM
CN-
CN (3
CN @
CN
CN
' PTL
l TTL
FT2
MIN
IN.HG
IN.H20
DCF
DEG.F
DSCF
ML
SCF
DEG.F
IN.HG
FPS
PSCFM
ACFM
MG
MG
PR/PSTF
GR/DSCF
12% C02
12% C02
GR/ACF
GR/ACF
LB/HR
LB/HR
LB/TON
LB/TON
1.000
64.0
29.86
0.595
27.16
83.8
26.45
33.0
1.56
5.6
0.944
1.3
19.1*
0.1
79.2
28.98
28.37
185.0
1
29.86
12.76k
593.
766.
90.9
252.10
3M*. 10
26.7
0.14678
0.20035
1.35491
1.84937
0.11356
0.15500
0.75
1.02
64.85725
88.52592
1241.3
1.000
64.0
29.84
0.618
28.06
86.4
27.18
22.9
1.08
3.8
0.962
1.3
19.4
0.1
79.2
28.98
28.56
139.0
1
29.84
10.582
539.
635.
102.8
241.20
324.10
25.6
0.13667
0.18364
1.26156
1.69516
0.11588
0.15571
0.63
0.85
33.21208
44.62704
1241.3
11.673
566.
700.
96.9
246.65
334.10
26.2
0.14173
0.19200
1.30824
1.77227
0.11472
0.15536
O.C9
0.93
49.03465
66.57G48
1241.3
B-44
-------
PLANT: C4BPI.,
LOCATION: NYC
OPERATOR: ERI
CONTINUED
PARTICULATE SUMMARY IN ENGLISH UNITS
DESCRIPTION
DATE OF RUN
STACK AREA
NET TIME OF RUN
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE
AVG ORIFICE PRES DROP
VOL DRY GAS-METER COND
AVG GAS METER TEMP
VOL DRY GAS-STD COND
TOTAL H20 COLLECTED
VOL H20 VAPOR-STD CON'D
PERCENT MOISTURE BY VOL
MOLE FRACTION DRY GAS
PERCENT C02 BY VOL, DRY
PERCENT 02 BY VOL, PRY
PERCENT CO BY VOL, DRY
PERCENT N2 BY VOL, DRY
MOLECULAR WT-DRY STK GAS
MOLECULAR WT-STK GAS
AVG STACK TEMPERATURE
NET SAMPLING-POINTS
STACK PRESSURE, ABSOLUTE
AVG STACK GAS VELOCITY
STK FLOURATE, DRY,STD CN
ACTUAL STACK FLOWRATE
PERCENT ISOKIMETIC
PARTICULATE WT-PARTIAL
PART ICULATE WT-TOTAL
PERC IMPINGER CATCH
PART. LOAD-PTL,STD CN
PART. LOAD-TTL,STD CN
PART. LOAD-PTL,STD CN 0
PART. LOAD-TTL.,STD CN @
PART. LOAD-PTL,STK CN
PART. LOAD-TTL.,STK CN
PART 1C FMIS-PARTIAL
UNITS
FT2
MIN
IN.HG
N.H20
DCF
DEG.F
DSCF
ML
SCF
PARTIC EMIS-TOTAL
PART EMIS/WT PRO FD PTL
PART EMIS/WT PRD FD TTL
PERCENT EXCESS AIR
DEG.F
i N.HG
FPS
DSCFM
ACFM
MG
MG
GR/DSCF
GR/DSCF
1.2% CO 2
12% C02
GR/ACF
GR/ACF
LB/HR
LB/HR
LB/TON
LB/TON
3
06-19-73
1.000
80.0
29.67
0.794
38. t*l
91.8
36.64
33.5
1.59
U.2
0.958
1.3
19. 4
0.1
79.2
28.98
28.53
185.0
1
29.67
12.769
598.
766.
99.8
138.10
226.30
39.0
0.0580U
0.09510
0.53573
0.87788
0.04529
0.07422
0.30
0.149
10.44212
17.11116
1241.3
4
06-19-73
1.000
80.0
29.67
0.930
41.40
93.1
39.42
40.9
1.94
4.7
0.953
1.2
19.6
0.0
79.2
28.98
28.46
212.0
1
29.67
14.552
651.
873.
98.7
143.20
268.40
46.6
0.05595
0.10486
0.55948
1.04863
0.04167
0.07811
0.31
0.58
10.26482
19.23935
1497.6
AVERAGE
13.661
624.
820.
99.3
140.65
247.35
42.8
0.05699
0.09998
0.54760
0.96326
0.04348
0.07616
0.30
0.54
10.35347
18.17525
1369.5
B-45
-------
PLANT: C5MPI
LOCATION: NYC
OPERATOR: ERI
PARTICULATE SUMMARY IN ENGLISH UNITS
DESCRIPTION
DATE OF RUN
STACK AREA
NET TIME OF RUN
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE
AVG ORIFICE PRES D
VOL DRY GAS-METER
AVG GAS METER TEMP
VOL DRY GAS-STD CO
TOTAL H20 COLLECTED
VOL H20 VAPOR-STD
PERCENT MOISTURE BY
MOLE FRACTION DRY G
PERCENT T02 BY VOL,
PERCENT 02 BY VOL,
PERCENT CO BY VOL,
PERCENT N2 BY VOL,
MOLECULAR WT-DRY ST
MOLECULAR WT-STK GA
AVG STACK TEMPERATURE
NET SAMPLING POINTS
STACK PRESSURE, AB
AVG STACK GAS VELO
STK FLOK'RATE, DRY,
ACTUAL STACK FLOWR
PERCENT ISOKINETIC
PARTICULATE WT-PAR
PARTICULATE WT-TOTAL
PERC IMPINGER CATCH
PART. LOAD-PTL,STD
PART. LOAD-TTL,STD
PART. LOAD-PTL,STD
PART. LOAD-TTL,STD
PART. LOAD-PTL,STK
PART. LOAD-TTL,STK
PART 1C EM IS-PARTIAL
PARTIC EMIS-TOTAL
PART EMIS/WT PRO FC
PART EMIS/WT PRO FD
PERCENT EXCESS AIR
UNITS 123 AVERAGE
05-18-73 05-18-73 05-18-73
top
:OND
ID
1
:OND
VOL
iAS
DRY
DRY
DRY
DRY
K GAS
,S
'RE
OLUTE
ITY
TD CN
TE
IAL
L
CN
CN
CN @
CN @
CM
CN
PTL
TTL
FT2
MIN
1 N.HG
IN.H20
DCF
DEG.F
DSCF
ML
SCF
DEG.F
IN.HG
FPS
DSCFM
ACFM
MG
MG
GR/PSCF
CR/DSCF
12% C02
12% C02
GR/ACF
GR/APF
LB/HR
LB/HR
LB/TON
LB/TOK
1.000
48.0
29.54
2.080
38.53
94.9
36.51
133.0
6.30
14.7
0.853
1.2
19.2
0.1
79.5
28.96
27.35
115.0
1
29.54
19.5G2
911.
1174.
108.9
49.10
150.50
67.4
0.02071
0.06348
0.20710
0.63480
0.01bU6
0.04922
0.16
0.50
11.14846
34.17192
1041.9
1.000
48.0
29.57
2.385
37.30
97.3
35.26
12.6.
0.60
1.7
0.983
1.1
19.1
0.1
79.7
28.94
28.76
118.0
1
29.57
18.181
972.
1091.
98.6
56.30
143.30
60.7
0.02459
0.06259
0.26825
0.68278
0.0219U
0.055/3
0.20
0.52
9.31128
23.69992
956.9
1.000
48.0
29.59
2.250
37.49
93.9
35.67
12.0
0.57
1.6
0.98.4.
1.1
19.2
0.1
79.6
28.94
28.77
112.0
1
29.59
16.400
887.
984.
109.2
71.90
177.60
59.5
0.03104
0.07668
0.33865
0.83649
U. 02798
0.06911
0.24
0.58
9.44426
23.32823
1027.1
18.048
923.
1083.
105.6
59.10
157.13
62.5
0.02545
0.06758
0.27133
0. 71802
0.02198
0.05802
0.20
0.53
9.96800
27.06G6C
1008.6
B-46
-------
PLANT: CGBPI
LOCATIOfJ: !,'YC
OPERATOR: ERI
PARTICULATE SUMMARY IN FNGLISH UNITS
DDOCRIPTION UNITS
DATE OF RUN
'STACK AREA FT2
NET TIME OF RUN MIN
BAROMFTRIC PRESSURE IN.HG
AVG ORIFICE PRES PROP I N. H20
VOL DRY GAS-METER COND DCF
AVG GAS METER TEMP PEG. F
VOL DRY GAS-STD COND PSCF
TOTAL H20 COLLECTED ML
VOL H20 VAPOR-STD COND SCF
PERCENT MOISTURE BY VOL
MOLE FRACTION DRY GAS
PERCENT C02 BY VOL/ DRY
PERCENT 02 BY VOL., DRY
PERCENT CO BY VOL, PRY
PERCENT N2 BY VOL, DRY
MOLECULAR WT-DRY STK GAS
MOLECULAR WT-STK GAS
AVG STACK TEMPERATURE PEG.F
NET SAMPLING POINTS
STACK PRESSURE, ABSOLUTE IN.HG
AVG STACK GAS VELOCITY FPS
STK FLOWRATE, DRY, STD CN DSCFM
ACTUAL STACK FLOWRATE
PERCENT ISOKINETIC
PARTI CULATE WT-PARTIAL
PARTI CULATE WT-TOTAL
PERC IMPINGER CATCH
PART. LOAD-PTL,STD CN
PART. LOAD-TTL,STD CN
PART. LOAD-PTL,STD CM @
PA.RT. LOAD-TTL,STD CN @
PART. LOAD-PTL,STK CN
PART. LOAD-TTL,STK CN
PA^RTIC EMIS-PARTIAL
PA'RTIC EMIS-TOTAL
PART EMIS/WT PRD FD PTL
PART EMIS/WT PRD FD TTL
PERCENT EXCESS AIR
ACFM
MG
MG
GR/DSCF
GR/PSCF
125 co2
12% C02
GR/ACF
GR/ACF
LB/HR
LB/HR
LB/TO!','
LB/TON
1
06-21-73
1.000
61*. 0
29.56
1.001
35.32
97.7
33.21*
32.0
1.52
u.i*
0.956
1.9
18.3
0.1
79.7
29.01*
28.55
235.0
1
29.56
15.080
652.
905.
103.9
239.00
358.70
33. 1*
0.11073
0.16619
0.69938
1.0^965
0.07973
0.11965
0.6-2
0.93
15.863U3
23.808U1
653.9
2
06-21-73
1.000
61*. 0
29. 51*
0.880
33.59
100.6
31. U
32.. 0
1.52
i*.6
0.951*
1.6
18.0
0.1
80.3
28.98
28.k7
29i*.0
1
29.51*
15.72U
62U.
9U3.
102.5
181*. 1*0
261*. 60
30.3
0.090UO
0. 12971
0.67796
0.97283
0.05980
0.08580
O.US
0.69
11.65863
16. 72925
552.1*
3
06-21-73
1.000
61*. 0
29.50
0.860
32.59
92.3
30.90
36.0
1.71
5.2
0.9U8
1.7
18.5
0.1
79.7
29.01
28.1*1*
301*. 0
1
29.50
15.601*
607.
936.
103.7
176. 1*0
689.50
7U. l*
0.08793
0.31*369
0.62067
2.1*2602
0.05695
0.22259
O.U6
1.79
13.85639
51*. 16089
712.1
AVERAGE
15.1*69
628.
928.
103.1*
199.93
1*37.60
1+6.0
0.09635
0.21320
0.66600
1.1*8283
0.065U9
0. 1U268
0.52
1.1U
13.79282
31.56616
639.5
B-47
-------
PLANT: C7BPI
LOCATION: NYC
OPERATOR: ERI
PARTICULATE SUMMARY IN ENGLISH UNITS
PESCRIPTION
DATE OF RUN
STACK AREA
NET TIME OF RUN
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE
AVG ORIFICE PRES D
VOL DRY GAS-METER
AVG GAS METER TEMP
VOL DRY GAS-STD CO
TOTAL H20 COLLECTED
VOL H20 VAPOR-STD
PERCENT MOISTURE PY
MOLE FRACTION PRY G
PERCENT C02 BY VOL,
PERCENT 02 BY VOL/
PERCENT CO PY VOL,
PERCENT N2 BY VOL,
MOLECULAR WT-DRY ST
MOLECULAR WT-STK GA
AVG STACK TEMPERATURE
NET SAMPLING POINTS
STACK PRESSURE, AB
AVG STACK GAS VELO
STK FLOWRATE, DRY,
ACTUAL STACK FLOV/R
PERCENT ISOKINETIC
PARTI CULATE V/T-PAR
PARTI CULATE V/T-TOTAL
PERC IMPIPPER CATCH
PART. LOAD-PTL,STD
PART. LOAD-TTL,STD
PART. LOAP-PTL,STD
PART. !.OAD-TTL,STD
PART. LOAD-PTL,STK
PART. LOAD-TT.L,STK
PARTIC Ff'lS-PARTIAL
PARTI C FM S-TOTAL
PART FfllS/V/T PRD FD
PART Ff'IS/WT PRP FD
PERCEPT FXCESS AIR
UNITS 123 AVERAGE
06-06-73 06-06-73 06-06-73
E
10P
POND
Mr
3
^OND
f VOL
?AS
, DRY
PRY
PRY
DRY
FK GAS
\S
JRE
%
SOLUTE
^ITY
5TD CN
\TE
* IAL
\l
1
CN
CN
CN @
CN 0
rr
cr
) PTL
) TTL
FT2
MIN
IN.HG
IN.H20
PCF
PEG.F
PSCF
ML
SCF
PEG.F
IN.HG
FPS
DSCFM
ACFM
MG
MG
GR/DSCF
GR/PSCF
11% C02
12% C02
GR/ACF
GR/ACF
LB/MR
LB/HR
LB/TOt!
LB/TON
1.000
56.0
29.96
2.570
45.35
82.8
44.62
58.5
2.77
5.9
0.9U1
1.4
16. 4
0.0
82.2
28.88
28.2U
216.0
1
29.96
23.537
10l*U.
1U12.
99.5
885.00
1389.10
36.3
0.305U7
0.479U7
2.61831
U. 10970
0.22561
0.35U11
2.73
U.29
58.13638
91.25113
309.4
1.000
64.0
29.96
2.860
50.95
95.1
49. OU
44.0
2.09
4.1
0.959
1.0
17.6
0.4
81.0
28.86
28.42
172.0
1
29.96
22.743
1099.
1365.
90.9
299.90
743.30
59.7
0.09417
0.23340
1.13006
2.80085
0.07579
0.18785
0.89
2.20
20.G286S
51.12805
436.7
1.000
56.0
29.96
2.160
32.97
92.3
31.85
34.3
1.63
4.9
0.951
1.0
18.4
0.0
80.6
28.90
28.37
198.0
1
29.96
21.140
973.
1268.
76.2
161.00
43.8.50
63.3
0.07786
0.21205
0.93428
2.54460
0,05970
0.16259
0.65
1.77
20.61612
56.1501C
639.2
22.473
1039.
1348.
88.9
448.63
856.97
53.1
0.15917
0.30831
1.56088
3.15172
0.12037
0.234S5
1.42
2.75
33.12701*
66.1764U
461.8
B-48
-------
PLANT: C
LOCATION:
OPERATOR:
NYC
ERI
PARTI CUI.ATE SUMMARY IN- FNPLISH UNITS
DESCRI PTIOK
DATE OF RUM
STACK AREA
NET TII'.F OF RUM
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE
AVG ORIFI CE PRES DROP
VOL PRY GAS-METER COND
AVG GAS METER TEMP
VOL DRY GAS-STD CON'D
TOTAL H20 COLLECTED
VOL H20 VAPOR-STD COND
PERCENT MOISTURE BY VOL
MOLE FRACTION PRY GAS
PERCENT C02 BY VOL, DRY
PERCENT 02 PY VOL, DRY
PERCENT CO FY VOL, DRY
PERCENT N2 BY VOL, PRY
MOLECULAR WT-DRY STK GAS
MOLECULAR WT-STK HAS
AVG STACK TEMPERATURE-
NET SAMPLING POINTS
STACK PRESSURE, ABSOLUTE
AVG STACK GAS VELOCITY
STK FLOWRATE, DRY, STD CN
ACTUAL STACK FLOWRATE
PERCENT ISOKIN'ETIC
PARTI CULATE WT-PARTIAL
PARTI CULATE" WT-TOTAL
PERT IMPINGER CATCH
PART. LOAD-PTL,STD CM
PART. LOAD-TTL,STD CN
PART. LOAD-PTL,STD CN @
PART. LOAD-TTL,STD CN @
PART. LOAD-PTL,STK CN
PART. LOAD-TTL,STK CN
PARTIC EMIS-PARTIAL
UNITS
FT2
WIN
IN.HG
IM.H20
DCF
DEG.F
DSCF
ML
SCF
PART 1C EM IS -TOTAL
PART EMIS/V.'T PRD FD PTL
PART EMIS/WT PRD FD TTL
PERCENT EXCESS AIR
DEG.F
I N.HG
FPS
DSCFM
APFM
MG
MH
GR/DSCF
GR/PSCF
12%' C02
12% P02
HR/ACF
GR/ACF
LB/HR
LB/HR
LB/TON
LB/TON
1
OG-19-73
1.000
56.0
29.84
1.820
35.50
104.4
33.39
22.7
1.08
3.1
0.969
1.3
19.1*
0.0
79.3
28.98
28.64
184.0
1
29.84
15.178
724.
911.
107.4
118.50
214.90
44.9
0.05466
0.09912
0.50452
0.91494
0.04343
0.07875
0.34
O.C2
10.76733
19.52657
1263.7
2
06-19-73
1.000
56.0
29.84
2.800
32.50
104.3
30.65
24.0
1.14
3.6
0.964
0.4
20.3
0.0
79.3
28.88
28.49
177.0
1
29.84
15.326
736.
920.
97.0
147.00
233.00
36.9
0.07386
0.11707
2.21587
3.51223
0.05905
0.09360
0.47
0.74
22.71767
36.00829
3195.9
3
06-19-73
1.000
56.0
29.84
1.875
32.50
102.1
30.69
25.8
1.13
3.5
0.965
1.5
19.0
0.0
79.5
29.00
28.61
153.0
1
29.84
12.406
619.
744.
115.5
154.60
256.70
39.8
0.07757
0.12879
0.62054
1.03035
0.06446
0.10704
0.41
0.68
20.57674
34.16591
955.7
AVERAGE
14.304
693.
858.
106.6
140.03
234.87
40.5
0.06870
0.11500
1.11364
1.81917
0.05565
0.09313
0.41
0.6S
18.02057
29.90024
1805.1
B-49
•"7
-------
PLANT: C9MPI
LOCATION: NYC
OPERATOR: FRI
PARTICULATE SUMMARY IN ENGLISH UNITS
DESCRIPTION
PATE OF RUN
STACK AREA
NET TIME OF RUN
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE
AVG ORIFICE PRFS PROP
VOL DRY GAS-METER COND
AVG GAS METER TEMP
VOL DRY GAS-STD COND
TOTAL H20 COLLECTED
VOL H20 VAPOR-STD COND
PERCENT MOISTURE BY VOL
MOLE FRACTION DRY GAS
PERCENT C02 BY VOL, DRY
PERCENT 02 BY VOL, DRY
PERCENT CO BY VOL, DRY
PERCENT N2 BY VOL, PRY
MOLECULAR UT-PRY STK GAS
MOLECULAR WT-STK GAS
AVG STACK TEMPERATURE
NET SAMPLING POINTS
STACK PRESSURE, ABSOLUTE
AVG STACK GAS VELOCITY
STK FLOWRATE, DRY,STD CN
ACTUAL STACK FLOWRATE
PERCENT ISOKINETIC
PART ICULATE WT-PARTIAL
PARTICULATE WT-TOTAL
PERC IMPINGER CATCH
LOAD-PTL,STP CN
LOAD-TTL,STP
LOAP-PTL,STD
LOAD-TTL,STD
LOAD-PTL,STK
UNITS
FT2
MIN
IN.HG
IN.H20
DCF
DFG.F
DSCF
ML
SCF
CN
CN
CN
CN
PART
PART
PART
PART
PART
PART. LOAD-TTL,STK CN
PARTI C HMIS-PARTIAL
PARTI C EMIS-TOTAL
PART EMIS/WT PRD FD PTL
PART FMIS/WT PRP FP TTL
PERCENT EXCESS AIR
DEG.F
IK.HG
FPS
DSCFM
ACFM
MG
MG
GR/PSCF
GR/PSCF
12% C02
12% 002
GR/ACF
GR/ACF
LB/HR
LB/HR
LB/TON
LB/TON
1
06-20-73
1.000
56.0
29.86
1.000
30.U2
83.2
29.69
23.0
1.09
3.5
0.965
0.5
20.1
0.0
79. 1*
28.88
28.50
150.0
1
29.86
13.288
667.
797.
103.7
21*5.50
399.50
38.5
0.127314
0.20722
3.05620
I*. 97332
0.106U2
0.1/318
0.73
1.18
31.63945
51.48659
2332.9
2
06-20-73
1.000
56.0
29.86
1.321
35.02
97.6
33.31
30.0
1.1*2
U.I
0.959
0.9
19.8
0.0
79.3
28. 9U
28.«*9
188.0
1
29.86
17.U88
821.
101*9.
91*. 5
109.60
201*. 10
1*6.3
0.05066
0.091*35
0.67552
1.25797
0.03963
0.07380
0.36
0.66
11.11*1*98
20.751*1*7
171* k. 2
3
06-20-73
1.000
56.0
28.86
1.632
39.92
107.3
36.11
31*. 2
1.62
1».3
0.957
1.1*
19.3
0.0
79.3
29.00
28.52
205.0
1
28.86
19.256
.850.
1155.
98.9
85.1*0
206.90
58.7
0.0361*2
0.08823
0.31211*
0.75622
0.02677
O.ObUSG
0.27
0.61*
7.26787
17.60797
1180.3
AVERAGE
16.678
779.
1001.
99.0
li*6.S3
270.17
1*7.9
0.0711*7
0.12993
1.31*795
2.32917
0.057bl
U.103D5
0. U5
O.S3
16.68UC
29.9i*9Gi
1752.5
B-50
-------
PLANT: C10MPI
LOCATION: NYC
OPERATOR: ER I
PARTICULATE SUMMARY IN ENGLISH UNITS
PESCRIPTION
DATE OF RUN
UNITS
05-21-73 05-21-73
AVERAGE
STACK AREA
MET TIME OF RUN
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE
AVG ORIFICE PRES PROP
VOL DRY GAS-METER COND
AVG GAS METER TEMP
VOL DRY GAS-STD COND
TOTAL H20 COLLECTED
VOL H20 VAPOR-STD COND
PERCENT MOISTURE BY VOL
MOLE FRACTION DRY GAS
PERCENT C02 BY VOL, DRY
PERCENT 02 BY VOL, DRY
PERCENT CO BY VOL, DRY
PERCENT N2 BY VOL, DRY
MOLECULAR WT-DRY STK GAS
MOLECULAR WT-STK GAS
AVG STACK TEMPERATURE
NET SAMPLING POINTS
STACK PRESSURE, ABSOLUTE
AVG STACK GAS VELOCITY
STK FLOWRATE, DRY,STD CN
ACTUAL STACK FLOWRATE
PERCENT ISOKINETIC
PARTICULATE WT-PARTIAL
PARTICULATE WT-TOTAL
PERC IMPINGER CATCH
PART. LOAD-PTL,STD CN
PART. LOAD-TTL,STD CN
PART. LOAP-PTL,STD CN Q
PART. LOAD-TTL,STD CN @
PART. LOAD-PTL,STK CN
PART. LOAD-TTL,STK CN
PART 1C EM IS- PARTIAL
PART 1C EMIS-TOTAL
PART EMIS/WT PRO FD PTL
PART EMIS/WT PRO FD TTL
PERCENT EXCESS AIR
FT2
M 1 N
1 N . HG
IN.H20
DCF
DEG.F
DSCF
ML
SCF
"
DEG.F
IN.HC
FPS
DSCFM
ACFM
MG
MG
GR/DSCF
GR/DSCF
12% C02
12% C02
GR/ACF
GR/ACF
LB/HR
LB/HR
LB/TON
LB/TON
1.000
1*0.0
29.50
3.700
1*1.13
92.0
39.29
1*0.0
1.90
l*.6
0.951*
1.0
19.6
0.1
79.3
28.9U
28. 1*1*
199.0
1
29.50
16.970
770.
1018.
93.6
129.60
21*1.1*0
1*6.3
0.05080
0.091*63
0.60962
1.13551
0.0381*0
0.07152
0.31*
0.62
11.17695
20.81879
1U11. I*
1.000
1*0.0
29.50
2.750
31*. 78
95.8
32.92
36.0
1.71
l*.9
0.951
1.0
19.6
0.1
79.3
28.91*
28.1*0
187.0
1
29.50
11*. 1*80
667.
869.
90.5
330.00
1*81.70
31.5
0.151*38
0.22535
1.85261
2.701*21*
0.1181*5
0.17290
0.88
1.29
27.15761
39.61*186
11*11.1*
15.725
719.
9U1*.
92.0
229.80
361.55
38.9
0.10259
0.15999
1.23111
1.91988
0.0781*3
0.12221
0.61
0.96
19.16727
30.23032
11*11.1*
B-51
-------
PLANT: U1BPI
LOCATION: NYC
OPERATOR: ERI
PARTICIPATE SUMMARY IK ENGLISH UNITS
DESCRIPTION
PATE OF RUN
STACK AREA
NET TIME OF RUN
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE
AVG ORIFICE PRES PROP
VOL DRY GAS-METER CON'D
AVG GAS METER TEMP
VOL DRY GAS-STP CON'D
TOTAL H20 COLLECTED
VOL H20 VAPOR-STP COND
PERCENT MOISTURE PY VOL
MOLE FRACTION DRY GAS
PERCENT C02 BY VOL, PRY
PERCENT 02 BY VOL, PRY
PERCENT CO BY VOL, PRY
PERCENT N2 BY VOL, DRY
MOLECULAR WT-DRY STK GAS
MOLECULAR WT-STK GAS
AVG STACK TEMPERATURE
NET SAMPLING POINTS
STACK PRESSURE, ABSOLUTE
AVG STACK GAS VELOCITY
STK FLOWRATE, PRY,STD CN
ACTUAL STACK FLOWRATE
PERCENT ISOKINETIT
PARTICULATE WT-PARTIAL
PARTICULATE WT-TOTAL
PERC IMPINGER CATCH
LOAD-PTL,STD CN
LOAP-TTL,STP CN
LOAP-PTL,STD
LOAD-TTL,STP
UNITS
FT2
MIN
IN.HG
IN.H20
DCF
DEG.F
PSCF
ML
SCF
CN
CN
@
13
PART
PART
PART
PART
PART. LOAD-PTL, STK CN
PART. LCAP-TTL,STK CM
PARTI C FMIS-PARTIAL
PARTI C FMIS-TOTAL
PART FMIS/V/T PRD FP PTL
PART FMIS/V/T PRP FP TTL
PERCENT EXCESS AIR
DEG.F
IM.HG
FPS
DSCFM
ACFM
MG
MG
GR/DSCF
GR/PSCF
12% C02
12% C02
GR/ACF
GR/ACF
LB/HR
LB/HR
LP/TOf!
LB/TOM
1
05-26-73
1.000
60.0
30.10
21.870
U3.97
71*. 9
1*6.16
1*7.2
2.21*
U.6
0.951*
1.8
18.2
0.1
79.9
29.02
28.51
199.0
1
30.10
20.015
926.
1201.
108.3
557.60
859.60
35.1
0.18603
0.28678
1.21*017
1.91185
0.11*31*1*
0.22113
1. 1*8
2. 28
M. 03618
63.26166
616. C
2
05-26-73
1.000
56.0
30.10
2.731
1*6.98
81.9
1*6.52
33.7
1.60
3.3
0.967
1.8
18.2
0.1
79.9
29.02
28.65
187.0
1
30.10
23.327
1115.
11*00.
97.2
131*. oo
3UU. 50
61.1
O.OU1*36
0.11UOI*
0.29572
0.76026
0.03531
0.09D79
O.U2
1.09
9.11591
2 3 . i» 3 G 0 1*
616.6
3
05-26-73
1.000
62.0
30.10
2.525
1*6.85
79.8
1*6.51*
35.5
1.68
3.5
0.965
1.8
18.2
0.1
79.9
29.02
28.63
225.0
1
30.10
22.191
1000.
1331.
97.9
178.20
312.70
1*3.0
0.05896
0.1031*6
0.39308
0.68976
0.01*1*26
0.07766
0.51
O.S9
9.90958
17.38901
616.6
AVERAGF
21.81*1*
1011*.
1311.
101.1
289.93
505.60
1*6. l»
0.0961*5
0.1G809
0.61*299
1.12063
0.071*31;
0.12980
0.80
1.1*2
20.02055
31*. 69556
. 61G.6
B-52
-------
PLANT: U2MPI
LOCATION: NYC
OPERATOR: ERI
PARTICULATE SUMMARY IN ENGLISH UNITS
DESCRIPTION UNITS
DATE OF RUN
STACK AREA FT2
NET TIME OF RUN . MIN
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE IN.HG
AVG ORIFICE PRFS PROP IN.H20
VOL DRY GAS-METER COND DCF
AVG GAS METER TEMP DEG.F
VOL DRY GAS-STD COK'D DSCF
TOTAL H20 COLLECTED ML
VOL H20 VAPOR-STD COND SCF
PERCENT MOISTURE BY VOL
MOLE FRACTION DRY GAS
PERCENT C02 BY VOL, PRY
PERCENT 02 BY VOL., DRY
PERCENT CO BY VOL, PRY
PERCENT N2 BY VOL, PRY
MOLECULAR WT- PRY STK GAS
MOLECULAR WT-STK GAS
AVG STACK TEMPERATURE DEG.F
NET SAMPLING POINTS
STACK PRESSURE, ABSOLUTE IN.HG
AVG STACK GAS VELOCITY FPS
STK FLOWRATE, PRY,STD CN DSCFM
ACTUAL STACK FLOWRATE ACFM
PERCENT ISOKINETIC
PARTICULATE WT-PARTIAL MC
PARTICULAR WT-TOTAL MG
PERC IMP INKER CATCH
PART. LOAP-PTL,STP CN GR/PSCF
PART. LOAD-TTL,STD CN GR/PSCF
PART. LOAD-PTL,STD CN @ 12% C02
PART. LOAP-TTL,STD CN Q 12% C02
PART. LOAD-PTL,STK CN GR/ACF
PART. LOAD-TTL,STK CN GR/ACF
PARTIC FMIS-PARTIAL LB/HR
PARTIC EMIS-TOTAL LB/HR
PART EMIS/WT PRO FP PTL LB/TON
PART EMIS/V/T PRO FD TTL LB/TON
PERCENT EXCESS AIR
1
06-26-73
1.000
56.0
30.10
1.590
37.61
96.9
36.Ui
37.1
1.76
4.6
0.954
1.5
19.0
0.1
79.1*
29.00
28.49
142.0
1
30.10
17.006
862.
1020.
97.7
134.20
240.20
44.1
0.05719
0.10236
0.45753
0.81891
0.04827
0.08639
0.42
0.76
13.84804
24.78613
942.0
2
06-26-73
1.000
64.0
30.. 10
0.826
33.49
97.0
32.12
36.8
1.74
5.2
0.948
1.5
19.0
0.1
79.4
29.00
28.43
160.0
1
30.10
11.561
566.
694.
115.7
60.80
118.30
48.6
0.02915
0.05672
0.23322
0.45379
0.02376
0.04623
0.14
0.28
5.33422
10.37892
942.0
AVERAGE
14.284
714.
857.
106.7
97.50
179.25
46.4
0.04317
0.07954
0.34537
0.63635
0.03601
0.06631
0.28
0.52
9.59113
17.58252
942.0
B-53
-------
PLANT: U3MPI
LOCATION: NYC
OPERATOR: FRI
PART ICU LATE SUMMARY IN ENGLISH UNITS
DESCRIPTION UNITS
DATE OF Rl?N
STACK AREA FT2
NET TIMF OF RUN MIN
PAROMETRIC PRESSURE IN.HG
AVG ORIFICE PRES DROP IN.H20
VOL DRY GAS-METER POND DCF
AVG GAS MFTER TEMP HEG.F
VOL DRY GAS-STD POND PSTF
TOTAL H20 COLLECTED ML
VOL H20 VAPOR-STD COMD STF
PERCENT MOISTURE BY VOL
MOLE FRACTION DRY GAS
PERCENT C02 BY VOL, DRY
PERCENT 02 BY VOL, DRY
PERCENT CO BY VOL, DRY
PERCENT N2 BY VOL, DRY
MOLECULAR WT-DRY STK GAS
MOLECULAR V/T-STK GAS
AVG STACK TEMPERATURE DFfi.F
NET SAMPLING POINTS .
STACK PRESSURE, ABSOLUTE IN.HG
AVG STACK GAS VELOCITY FPS
STK FLOWRATE, DRY,STD CM DSCFM
ACTUAL STACK FLOWRATE ACFM
PERCENT ISOKINETIC
PARTICULATE WT-PARTIAL MC
PARTICULATE WT-TOTAL MG
PERC IMPINGER CATCH
LOAD-PTL,STD CN GR/DSCF
LOAD-TTL,STD CN GR/DSCF
PART.
PART.
PART.
PART.
PART.
LOAD-PTL,STD CN @ \l% C02
LOAD-TTL,STD CN 0 12% C02
LOAD-PTL,STK CN GR/ACF
PART. LOAD-TTL,STK CN GR/ACF
PARTIC EMIS-PARTIAL LB/HR
PARTIC EMIS-TOTAL LB/HR
PART F.MIS/WT PRO FD PTL LB/TOK
PART EtflS/WT PRD FP TTL LB/TON
PERCENT EXCESS /»I R
3
05-30-73
1.000
56.0
29.60
3.956
60.65 •
109.0
56.1*3
79.6
3.77
6.3
0.937
1.8
17.6
0.1
80.5
28.99
28.30
153.0
1
29.60
27.961*
13U5.
1678.
97.7
1*8.1*0
119.60
59.5
0.01321
0.03261*
0.08806
0.21760
0.01058
0.02615
0.15
0.38
2.671U1
6.60126
i*7l*. 1
2
0-5-30-73
1.000
56.0
29.60
3.733
59.00
108.8
5U. 88
81. U
3.86
6.6
0.934
1.8
17.6
0.1
80.5
28.99
28.27
11*U.O
1
29.60
26.893
1308.
161U.
97.7
77.90
153.80
1*9.3
0.02186
0.01*316
O.U571*
0.28771*
0.01772
0.031*98
0.25
0.1*8
9.25205
18.26657
i*7i». 1
AVERAGE
27.1*29
1327.
161*6.
97.7
63.15
136.70
5»*. i*
0.01753
0.03790
0.11690
0.25267
0.01U15
0.03056
0.20
0.1*3
5.96173
12.U3391
i*7i». 1
B-54
-------
PLANT: Ul*BHI
LOCATION: NYC
OPERATOR: ER I
PART ICULATE SUMMARY IN ENGLISH UNITS
DESCRIPTION
DATE OF RUN
STACK AREA
NET TIME OF RUN
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE
AVG ORIFICE PRES DROP
VOL DRY GAS-METER COND
AVG GAS METER TEMP
VOL DRY GAS-STD COND
TOTAL H20 COLLECTED
VOL H20 VAPOR-STD COND
PERCENT MOISTURE BY VOL
MOLE FRACTION DRY GAS
PERCENT C02 BY VOL, PRY
PERCENT 02 BY VOL, PRY
PERCENT CO BY VOL, DRY
PERCENT N2 BY VOL, DRY
MOLECULAR WT-DRY STK GAS
MOLECULAR WT-STK GAS
AVG STACK TEMPERATURE -
NET SAMPLING POINTS
STACK PRESSURE, ABSOLUTE
AVG STACK GAS VELOCITY
STK FLOWRATE, DRY,STD CN
ACTUAL STACK FLOWRATE
PERCENT ISOKINETIC
PARTICULATE WT-PARTIAL
PARTITULATE WT-TOTAL
PERC IMPIMGER CATCH
PART. LOAD-PTL,STD CN
PART. LOAD-TTL,STD
PART. LOAD-PTL,STD
PART. LOAD-TTL,STD
PART. LOAD-PTL,STK
PART. LOAD-TTL,STK
PARTIC EMIS-PARTIAL
UNITS
FT2
MIN
IN.HG
IN.H20
DCF
DEG.F
PSCF
ML
SCF
CN
CN
CN
CN
CN
PART 1C EM IS- TOTAL
PART EMIS/WT PRD FD
PART EMIS/WT PRD FD
PERCENT EXCESS AIR
PTL
TTL
DEG.F
IN.HG
FPS
PSCFM
ACFM
MG
MG
GR/DSCF
GR/PSCF
12% C02
12% C02
GR/ACF
GR/ACF
LR/HR
LB/HR
LB/TON
LB/TON
1
06-29-73
1.000
6«*. 0
29.88
0.9UO
32.10
102.U
30.27
51.0
2.U2
7.1*
0.926
1.9
18.2
0.1
79.8
29.03
28.22
11*7.0
1
29.88
29.865
11*1*7.
1792.
95.9
65.20
102.60
36.5
0.03317
0.05220
0.209U9
0.32966
0.02676
0.01*211
0.1*1
0.65
6. 47707
10. 192U5
622.2
2
06-29-73
1.000
6U. 0
29.88
0.8UO
30.55
106.1*
28.61
52.0
2.U6
7.9
0.921
1.9
18.2
0.1
79.8
29.03
28.16
128.0
1
29.88
27.i*7U
1366.
161*8.
96.0
61*. 50
98.30
31*. I*
0.031*72
0.05292
0.21931
0.331*23
0.02875
0. 04382
0.1*1
0.62
5.56880
8.U8702
622.2
AVERAGE
28.670
11*06.
1720.
96.0
6U. 85
100.1*5
35.1*
0.03395
0.05256
0.211*1*0
0.53191*
0.02//b
O.OU297
0.1*1
0.63
6.02293
9.33973
622.2
B-55
-------
APPENDIX C
Stack Testing Personnel
C-l
-------
Stack Testing Personnel
Michael Kormanik
Anthony Cava
Ellis Johnson
Carlos Marales
Kenneth Cabiness
Robert Baker
Kenneth Moore
Thomas Card
Theodore Hudson
Arthur Fossa
William Hartenstein
Wayne Roberts
Charles Wylie
Jerome Hatch
David Prosser
Charles Chernoff
Kevin Hafinin
David Jones
James McGarry
Richard Foley
Roger McCabe
Dominic Buccilli
Marsden Chen
Neil Isabelle
Burton Pine
Michael Moore
Bruce Neddo
Donald Daoust
David Wazenkewitz
Henry Moore
Patrick Balogna
C-2
-------
APPENDIX D
Fuel Analysis
D-l
-------
FUEL ANALYSIS
o
Identity
A1BHB
5-22-73
A10BHB
C1BHB
A3BHB
B5BHB
U4MPB
5-11-73
B4MPB
3-30-73
F-73-000-024
API
Gravity
25.5
25.2
25.1
25.4
20.6-
21.1
25.1
Specific
60/60° F
0.9013
0.9030
0.9036
0.9018
0.9303
0.9273
0.9036
Gravity
15/46C
• •• i itm±m=msma
0.9008
0.9025
0.9031
0.9014
0.9298
0.9267
0.9031
Viscosity
@ 100°F
SUS
142.6
186.8
160.0
142.8
378.0
282.0
147.3
%
•'• L.»r ••mea^eEag
0.003
0.002
0.006
0.003
1.03
0.59
0.003
%
_ril Sulfur f
0.24
0.27
0.29
0.29
0.43
0.39
0.30
% BTU/
Carbon Pound
^^^^^™^Bl^"IB^"n""«Hi^B^=B
86.03 19,240
* 19,260
* 19,220
* 19,275
85.12 18,890
* 18,930
* 19,290
U3MPB
4-18-73
F-73-000-029
A8MPB
F-73-000-030
A9MPB
F-73-000-031
A2BPB
F-73-000-033
25.2
24.0
24.5
25.5
0.9030
0.9025
113.0
0.003
0.29
85.24
19,245
0.9100
0.9065
0.9013
0.9095
0.9060
0.9008
309.0
213.0
122.6
0.009
0.007
0.003
0.36 *
0.39 *
0.32 *
19,200
19,220
19,185
-------
Viscosity
0
Identity
B4MPB
4-3-73
F-73-000-034
D4BPB
F-73-000-037
U1BPB
5-27-73
F-73-000-039
U5BPB
5-22-73
F- 73- 000- 040
A6BPB
5-7-73
F-73-000-045
U2MPB
4-20-73
F-73-000-046
A7MPB
4-13-73
F-73-000-047
B2BPB
73 SM 544
B1MPB
73 SM 546
API Specific
Gravity 60/60° F
25.2 0.9030
25.0 0,9042
24.7 0.9059
24.5 0.-9071
25.3 0.9024
25.6 0.9007
25.8 0.8996
N.A. N.A.
N.A. N.A.
Gravity
1574°C
0.9025
0.9037
0.9054
0.9065
0.9019
0.9002
0.8991
N.A.
N.A.
@ 100°F
SUS
147.3
139.5
261.0
-286.0
110.2
91.1
66.5
169.8
82.5
^ <£ & DTI I/
/w /o /t> Di \j /
Ash Sulfur Carbon Pound
0.003 0.36 * 19,755
0.001 0.31 * 19,175
0.004 0.29 * 19,240
0.003 0.26 * 19,100
0.005 0.31 * 19,120
0.004 0.31 * 19,100
0.004 0.32 * 19,135
0.004 0.33 * 19,170
0.004 0.35 * 19,440
-------
Viscosity
API Specific Gravity @ 100°F
BTU/
D
-^
Identity
I-.'---::
A4MPB
73 SM 548
B3BPB
73 SM 586
D3MPB
73 SM 588
D1MPB
3-27-73
D2MPB
3-22-73
A5MPB
3-21-73
Gravity
N.A.
24.8
26.3
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
60/60° F
N.A.
0.9053
0.8967
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
15/4°C
N.A.
0.9048
0.8962
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
SUS
126.6 '
173.1
64.5
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
Ash -
0.004
0.009
0.005
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
Sulfur Carbon
0.35 *
0.29 *
0.34 85.86
0.33 *
0.33 *
0.96 *
Pound
19,100
19,230
19,000
19,278
19,256
19,073
*The carbon content at these sites is assumed to be 85.4%
-------
APPENDIX E
Sample Forms
E-l
-------
IJOILER 1-QUIPMI.lNT CHDCKLI5T
NYC Certificate of Operation?
Boiler: Mfr.
Model No.
iX Steel
or
Cast Iron
Approx. Age
Is
Steam or _; _ Hot Water
Steam Pressure j PSI Gage
No. of Flue Passes _
Furnace Volume cu. ft.
Gross Output
BTUH
Primary Oil Heater*
Secondary Oil Heateri
Combustion Controller»
.Sequential Draft Controller!
Barometric Dampen
Windbox»
VentilationpLouvre(s) __
••» '
in boiler room:
open door(s)
open vdndow(s)
fresh air duct __
fresh air fan _
Chimney Height! t3 ft.
BHP
Yes
Yes
I/Yes
_ Yes
_ Yes
_ Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
fa
Yes IS No
Burner! Mfr.
Model No.
Operationi
• stepped
i '
modulating
Type' /^ Horizontal Rotary Cup
Air Atomizer
Steam Atomizer
Other
Max. Firing Rate. «.£_*£__ GPH
No Fire Tube yes
No
No
Water Tube yes
Sectional yes
L^ No area
^ No area
k No area
No area
sq. in.
sq. in.
sq. in.
sq. in*
no
no
no
E-2
-------
DOWN//
Condition of Equipment - Remarks
-2-
Soot Blowing: /V0tfC.
Method: Compressed Air _ psig.
_____ Steam , psig*
Shot
Frequency _____ Per Day
Time Duration minutes
Type of Soot Blowert Stationary Rotating
Manual Retracting
Automatic Retracting
. Other
No. of Boilers
Total Boiler Firing Rate gph
Provide rough sketch of internal construction of boiler with overal dimensionsi
E-3
-------
nOWJJ//3
]. Is there n source of electricity? *f£$ > di*j«»4»—Hne or germral use?
• (JuS£
Ir> fuse box accessible? J&? Amperage: •
' i
»
2. Are woll plugs available for intercom, roof and boiler room?
Can wired phones be used, roof to boiler room?
3. How will equipment be raised? Elevator, stairs, roof pulley, dumwaiter?
4. Is parking generally available?
5. How many floors in the buildingt»
Remarks
Boiler Room
1. Is stack used only for boiler?
Other equipment exhaust to stack (other boilers, incinerators, water
heaters, etc.) JV0A/& .
2. Must one or two oil meters be installed? Z —
3. Where and how is burner recycled (started) rffrt* 7 //7& f<~
4. Is serviceman needed to operate
5. What is firing rate (GPM) of burner? &-f _ Approx.
6. Is breeching accessible? '&/ Is i" hole available?
Can hole be drilled easily?
7. Is soot blowing utilized? rr0 How many times/day
How long is each blowperiod? _ When? •
8. Can stack test be performed in basement? /rJ *
If yes, provide details or sketch.
Remarks ___
E-4
-------
BOILER ROOM DATA
E-5
-------
Plan
Local
Run No.
Date
PARTICULATE FIELD DATA
Filter No.
Ambient Temp F
Bar. Press "Hg
39-
Assumed Moisture %
Condensate
Operator
Meter Box No.
Sample Box No
Meter A H
C Factor ,/
Heater Box Setting, F
Probe Tip Dia., In;
Probe Length
? '
— *
Probe Heater Setting
Avg. A P ' Avg. A H
Start
Point
Sampling
Time
Dry Gas
Meter CF
Pitot
AP
Orifice
AH
Dry Gas Temp
In
Out
Vacuum
"Hq
Impinger
Temp °F
Stack
Temp °F
Stack Gas
Velocity FPJ
7 f
-33
//: V-o
144.
33L
//
10*
-Ul
so
78
/
•2.9*
1^.00
&8
78
Total
Avq.
Avq.
iA,vq .
Avq.
SC-52 .(9/72)
-------
RESULTS OF GKSAT ANALYSIS
TEST
Description of equipment balng tested
Hr-
Orsat analysis data
Tests made by
lime
co2
Orsat % C02
Readlnq
S'trl
£•&%
S.I
0^ .^(fl
4
.°2
Orsat % 02
Readlnq
/3. 1 7«
13. ^
»?>'/
o**i, /^» /
f
CO
Orsat % CO
Reading
.1%
.2%
• 1%
*#i. t*1-
9
% N2
FUto Gas
Temperature
Remarks:
AQC 55
E-7
-------
CAR DP!;; ..BALAKCE
(Basis: One Hour'of Actual Burner Operation)
ddress
Fuel Analysis
, Gallons of fuel burned in one hour ~
_gal.
Pounds of fuel burned in one hour
. 890?
gal
pounds
3> Amount of carbon burned in one hour
b C x 303' - Ibs fuel
' Ib fuel
Ibs carbon
Date....
Orsat Analysis
4. Volumetric flow rate, Qs -
@ standard conditions (dry)
5. C02 flow rate
x Qs =
100
CFH
6. GO flow rate =
O) x Qs = «
100
/7/ CFH.
7. Total CO + CO flow rate =
8. Pounds C being emitted =
CFH x 492 x 12
530 359
Ibs carbon
E-8
CFH
CFH
-------
Cf OCI' J irlt. it'is'-"
CrO< K
M'.'.C ">
0?
3°
60
30
30
2
"2T
(0
60
30
64
•C.''-
"
7
.1 f '• — • XI
I LOCATION /
I OBSERVER
,| (Indicole sun, wind direction, slock on-l dislonce)
CLOCK TIME
30
60
30
6O
RING. <*
< 1
CLOCK TIME RING. tt
^Q
60
30
fcr
o
o
o"
o
o
p
o'
o_
o
o
30
64
30
30
E-9.
60
fo.
It
&
o
CP
o
o
o
-------
(03
^f**
Q
E-10
-------
UP in
PRETEST INCINERATOR
Stack and Hoof
*1. Is chimney structurally sound?
*2. What Is height of stack above roof __. ...y£^T_ .» above penthouse
*3. Is there a roof settling chamber?
4
How many stack diameters is available above chamber?
Can this stack be tested on lower floor or.* penthouse?
4. Should this site be rejected based on items (*) above? *
5. Inside stack dimensions £$*K3L
-------
UP #2
DRAW DIAGRAM OF STACK, SHOW HOW SPARK ARRESTOR IS ATTACHED AND NOTE IF THERE
WILL BE OBSTRUCTIONS TO SEALING THE INSERTS
£.!>.. 2-' **-'
O.b.HO" X
TOP.
E-12
-------
DOWN #1
PRETEST INCINERATOR INSPECTION
NYC Certificate of Operation:
Incinerator Manufacturer:
Model No.:
Volume of Chamber:
Grate Area:
Charging Gate:
Primary Gas Burner (s):
Gas Auxiliary Burner (s):
Gas Scrubbers:
Automatic By-Pass Damper:
Cycling Clock:
Yes
Year
No
Type: flue fed or v direct fed
\Xsingle chamber or multiple chamber
single flue or double flue
Ventilation: louvre (s):
cu.
sq.
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
(s):
(s):
(s):
uct:
fan:
ft.
ft. MO SAATE
no
vr no Firing Rate:
_J/_no Firing Rate:
(/no; rated capacity
(/no
I/no
yes iXno area
v/_yes no area
yes !,/ no area
yes IX no area
yes {/no
CFM
CFM
cfm@1600°F
sq. in.
sq. in.
sq. in.
sq. in.
overfire air fan
$ nozzle system:
I/:
no
Height of refuse during normal burn (estimate) ^ ft. above floelow Q FROM
bottom of door.
above
________ of door.
Can 1/4" hole be drilled in breaching at furnace outlet?
Can stack test be performed in basement? es
Condition of Equipment:
/•es
no
E-13
-------
APPENDIX F
ADDITIONAL BOILER TEST RESULTS
F-l
-------
RETEST OF FOUR APARTMENT HOUSE BOILERS
IN NEW YORK CITY
Introduction
These additional tests were initiated and conducted entirely by the
New York State Department of Environmental Conservation and are not
considered an official part of an earlier study for the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency. The purpose of these tests was to measure the emissions
from four of the same boiler sites tested during the previous study to
ascertain if emissions from these sites during colder weather would differ
substantially from the earlier results. The testing procedures employed
were identical to those in the 1973 series of tests but Bacharach readings,
fuel oil temperatures and boiler room temperatures were not recorded.
Fuel samples were taken and analyzed for sulfur, ash, and BTU content.
Discussion
These stack tests were conducted during February, 1974. The average
ambient temperature recorded by the test personnel was 36°F which is
slightly warmer than normal for February in New York City but colder than
the ambient temperatures experienced during the 1973 series of tests.
While four tests are insufficient for a statistical determination, a
trend is evident in the tabulated emissions which follow. Three of the
test results show an increase in pollutant mass rate (ib/hr) which would be
expected when oil consumption increases. The measured particulate concen-
trations (grains/SCF) also show an increase, as does the particulate
emissions expressed in pounds per 1000 gallons of fuel. Only one site,
A4MPB, revealed a decrease in emissions. At this site, the management has
made control panel alterations which have changed the operation of the
boiler since it was tested in 1973. The full extent of the work performed
is not known but the changes appear to have lowered the particulate emissions.
Summary
The results of only four tests are insufficient data upon which to base
conclusions affecting the results of the 1973 series of tests. They do
provide sufficient reason to suspect particulate emissions from apartment
house boilers in New York City may increase during colder weather. The
cause of the increased emissions may be due to decreased combustion
efficiency at higher firing rates, increased stack velocities, poor main-
tenance during the previous year, or a combination of these or other
unidentified factors.
Test Personnel
Neil Isabelle Bruce Neddo
Burt Pine Carlos Morales
Ellis Johnson Harold Avery
Donald Daoust Kenneth Cabiness
F-2
-------
SITE
CODE
A4MPB
1
2
3
Avg.
Avg.
C1BHB
1
2
Avg.
Avg.
D1MPB
1
2
**3
Avg.
Avg.
U4MPB
1
2
*3
Avg.
Avg.
*Total
FILTER FILTER
Gr/SCF
@1 2$C02 Lb/Hr
2-27-74
0.078 0.89
0.095 0.82
0.091 1.03
0.088 0.91
4-14-73
0.124 1.35
2-14-74
0.037 2.75
0.028 2.05
0.032 2.40
6-27-73
0.026 0.50
2-12-74
0.113 0.33
0.123 0.29
0.205 0.57
0.147 0.40
3-27-73
0.027 0.13
2-26-74
0.184 1.28
Test rejected -
0.190 1.24
0.187 1.26
5-11-73
0.079 0.47
catch rejected -
TOTAL FILTER
Lb/Hr Lb/106BTU
2.40 0.150
2.01 . 0.142
2.19 0.171
2.20 0.154
2.12 0.290
6.88 0.076
7.20 0.057
7.04 . 0.067
1.92 0.035
0.49 0.138
0.50 0.114
0.78 0.201
0.59 0.151
0.25 0.056
1.68 0.240
Abnormal probe .wash
0.243
0.242
0.68 0.123
FILTER
TOTAL
Lb/103Gal Lb/103Gal
21.5
20.5
24.5
22.2
'42.1
10.9
8.3
9.6
5.1
20.0
16.6
29.2
21.9
8.1
34.7
35.1
34.9
17.5
58.0
50.3
52.1
53.5
.65.8
27.3
29.0
28.2
19.6
30.0
28.6
39.7
32.8
14.8
45.8
•
25.7
Gal/Hr
Fuel
41
40
42
41
32.2
252
248
250
98
16.4
17.5
19.6
17.8
16
36.8
35.4
36.1
26.4
Impinger catch contaminated
**Higher Ringelmann readings observed during
Overall averages
-1974-
0.114 1.13
-1973-
.064 0.61
of these four sites
2.68 0.153
1.24 0.126
this" test run
•
•
22.1
18.2
40.1
31.6
74.9
43.2
F-3
-------
SITE
CODE
A4MPB
2/27/74
4/14/73
C1BHB
2/14/74
6/27/73
D1MPB
2/12/74
3/27/73
U4MPB
2/26/74
5/11/73
AVERAGED
ORSATS
C02
2.6
3.0
3.8
1.6
4.9
7.0
5.3
5.4
02
16.5
14.5
15.5
19.1
14.0
10.7
13.3
13.4
CO
-
0.4
-
0.1
-
0.5
-
0.5
Average
Ringel-
mann
0.5
0
0
N.A.
1
N.A.
1.5
0-3
Ambient
Temp.
@10a.m.
31
45
39
69
30
46
30
61
FUEL OIL DATA
Heat
Value
BTU/Lb
19073
19100
19125
19220
19256
19278
19186
18930
. Ash
Content
%
0.05
.004
0.02
.006
0.003
N.A.
0.02
0.123
Sulfur
Content
%
0.24
0.29
0.26
.29
0.25
0.33
0.26
0.39
F-4
-------
TECHNICAL REPORT DATA
(Please read Instructions on the reverse before completing)
1. REPORT NO.
EPA-450/3-76-008
3. RECIPIENT'S ACCESSION>NO.
4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE
Determination of Particulate Emission Factors for
Boilers and Incinerators Bronx and Manhattan
5. REPORT DATE
February 1974
6. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE
7. AUTHOR(S)
E. W. Savoie and M. Kormanik
8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NO.
9. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS
Environmental Conservation Research,
50 Wolf Road
Albany, NY 12201
10. PROGRAM ELEMENT NO.
Inc.
11. CONTRACT/GRANT NO.
68-02-1070
12. SPONSORING AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS
Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Air and Waste Management
Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards
Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
13. TYPE OF REPORT AND PERIOD COVERED
Final
14. SPONSORING AGENCY CODE
15. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES
16. ABSTRACT
The purpose of this project was to determine particulate emission factors for residual
oil-fired boilers and flue-fed incinerators in apartment houses in South Bronx and
Upper Manhattan, New York City. Twenty-five boilers were tested ranging in age from
new to fifty years old, with maximum burning rates ranging from 14 to 100 gallons of
fuel per hous. Twenty-one incinerators were tested with charging rates from 84 to 383
pounds per hous. All installations were tested as found, that is, no adjustment or
maintenance other than cleaning the incinerator was performed prior to conducting the
tests.
Tests were conducted utilizing the particulate sampling train developed by EPA. The
emission factors on a dry filter basis were determined to be:
a. 24.0 pounds of particulate per 1000 gallons of low sulfur residual fuel oil.
bl. 18.9 pounds of particulate per ton of refuse burned.
2. 7.9 pounds of particulate per ton of refuse charged.
The emission factors on a total (filter plus impinger) basis were found to be:
a. 33.5 pounds of particulate per 1000 gallons of low sulfur residual fuel oil.
bl. 32.9 pounds of particulate per ton of refuse burned.
2. 13.9 pounds of particulate per ton of refuse charge.
KEY WORDS AND DOCUMENT ANALYSIS
DESCRIPTORS
b.lDENTIFIERS/OPEN ENDED TERMS C. COSATI FieW/GlOUp
18. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT
Release unlimited
19. SECURITY CLASS (ThisReport)
UNCLASSIFIED '
21. NO. OF PAGES
114
20. SECURITY CLASS (Thispage)
UNCLASSIFIED
22. PRICE
EPA Form 2220-1 (9-73)
G--1
------- |