EPA-450/4-74-Ol4-a
MARCH 1975
(OAQPS NO. 1.2-032)
GUIDELINES FOR AIR QUALITY
MAINTENANCE PLANNING AND ANALYSIS
VOLUME 13:
ALLOCATING PROJECTED EMISSIONS
TO SUBCOUNTY AREAS
APPENDICES A and B
P
I! l!'S- ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
ra Office of Air anil Waste Management
Office of Air Duality Planning and Standards
Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711
-------
NOTICE
This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored
by the United States Government. Neither the United States
nor the United States Atomic Energy Commission, nor any
of their employees, nor any of their contractors, subcon-
tractors, or their employees, makes any warranty, express or
implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for
the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any information,
apparatus, product or process disclosed, or represents that
its use would not infringe privately-owned rights.
-------
EPA-450/4-74-Ol4-a
(OAQPS NO. 1.2-032)
GUIDELINES FOR AIR QUALITY
MAINTENANCE PLANNING AND ANALYSIS
VOLUME 13:
ALLOCATING PROJECTED EMISSIONS
TO SUBCOUNTY AREAS
APPENDICES A and B
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Office of Air and Waste Management
Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards
Research Triangle Park, N. C. 27711
March 1975
-------
OAQPS GUIDELINE SERIES
The guideline series of reports is being issued by the Office of Air Quality
Planning and Standards (OAQPS) to provide information to state and local
air pollution control agencies; for example, to provide guidance on the
acquisition and processing of air quality data and on the planning and
analysis requisite for the maintenance of air quality. Reports published in
this series will be available - as supplies permit - from the Air Pollution
Technical Information Center, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina
27711; or, for a fee, from the National Technical Information Service, 5285
Port Royal Road, Springfield, Virginia 22161.
This report was furnished to the Environmental Protection Agency by
Argonne National Laboratory, Energy and Environmental Studies Division,
Argonne, Illinois, in fulfillment of Project No. 3, Interagency Agreement
No. EPA-IAG-D4-0463. Prior to final preparation, the report underwent
extensive review and editing by the Environmental Protection Agency.
The contents reflect current Agency thinking and are subject to clarification,
procedural change, and other minor modification prior to condensation
for inclusion in Requirements for Preparation, Adoption, and Submittal of
Implementation Plans (40 CFR Part 5l) .
Publication No. EPA-450/4-74-014-a
(OAQPS Guideline No. 1.2 - 032)
11
-------
FOREWORD
These appendices provide documentation of a test case for
the Subcounty Emission Allocation technique described in the thirteenth
volume of a series comprising Guidelines for Air Quality Maintenance
Planning and Analysis. The intent of the series is to provide state and
local agencies with information and guidance for the preparation of Air
Quality Maintenance Plans required under 40 CFR 51. The volumes in this
series are:
Volume _!: Designation of Air Quality Maintenance Areas
Volume 2: Plan Preparation
Volume 5: Control Strategies
*
Volume £: Land Use and Transportation Considerations
Volume 5^: Case Studies in Plan Development
Volume 6_: Overview of Air Quality Maintenance Area Analysis
Volume 7_: Projecting County Emissions
Volume 8: Computer-Assisted Area Source Emissions Gridding
Procedure
Volume 9_: Evaluating Indirect Sources
Volume 10: Reviewing New Stationary Sources
Volume 11; Air Quality Monitoring and Data Analysis
Volume 12: Applying Atmospheric Simulation Models to Air
Quality Maintenance Areas
Volume 13: Allocating Projected Emissions to Subcounty Areas
Additional volumes may be issued.
ill
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
APPENDIX A: Trial Application of the Subcounty Emission Allocation Procedures
to Fulton County, Georgia; Summary
A.I INTRODUCTION 1
A. 2 EMISSION SOURCES 3
A.2.1 Residential Fuel Combustion Emissions 3
A.2.2 Transportation Emissions 8
A.2.3 Commercial/Institutional Fuel Combustion Emissions ... 12
A. 2.4 Industrial Process and Fuel Combustion Emissions .... 17
A.2.5 Solid Waste Incineration Emissions 24
A.3 MASTER GRIDDING 26
A.4 MASTER GRID EMISSIONS 32
APPENDIX B: Trial Application of the Subcounty Emission Allocation Procedures
to Fulton County, Georgia; Complete Documentation
Page
B.I INTRODUCTION 43
B.2 EMISSION SOURCES 43
B.2.1 Residential Fuel Combustion Emissions 44
B.2.2 Transportation Emissions 70
B.2.3 Commercial/Institutional Fuel Combustion Emissions . . 127
B.2.4 Industrial Process and Fuel Combustion Emissions . . . 146
B.2.5 Solid Waste Incineration Emissions 247
B.3 MASTER GRIDDING 274
B.4 MASTER GRID EMISSIONS . . . '. 309
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 346
IV
-------
APPENDIX A
Trial Application of the Subcounty Emission Allocation Procedures
to Fulton County, Georgia; Summary
A. 1 Introduction
This appendix illustrates results from the practical application
of the methodology for Allocating Projected Emissions to Subcounty Areas
to Fulton County (Atlanta), Georgia. Fulton was selected as a case study
for this procedure because it represents a typical medium-sized Air Quality
Control Region (AQCR) county. The case study therefore provides a reasonable
example of the kinds of data that are available, the types of assumptions
that will be necessary to apply these data to the methodology, and the level
of effort needed to complete the allocations for an average size county.
It has been impossible to append to this volume of the Guidelines
all of the tables necessary for the Fulton County test case. Therefore, the
4
results of this practical exercise have been published in two Appendices.
Appendix A, which is here attached to Volume 15, describes how data were
adapted for implementation and briefly highlights results obtained from the
Fulton County analysis. The complete set of tables generated for the test
case have been published separately as Appendix B. Copies of Appendix B
are available upon request from the USEPA Air Pollution Technical Information
•Center, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711 and from the National
Technical Information Service, 5825 Port Royal Road, Springfield, Virginia
22161.
In addition to this introduction, which constitutes Section 1,
Appendix A is divided into three other sections. Section 2 is subdivided
into five parts that correspond with each of the different types of sources
treated in Allocating Projected Emissions to Subcounty Areas (e.g., residen-
tial fuel combustion, transportation, commercial/institutional fuel combustion,
industrial process and fuel combustion, and solid waste incineration. Each of
these sections discusses the allocation Order applied, data employed, assess-
ments of the quality and suitability of these data to the specified procedure,
-------
problems encountered, and assumptions in force. The text pertaining to each
source category also includes a brief summary of emission results and, where
possible, compares the results with calculations that have been independently
prepared elsewhere. Section 3 of Appendix A deals with the master gridding
technique applied to Fulton County. The procedure is described and a map
illustrating the gridded overlay is presented. Section 4 presents the final
output of the subcounty emission allocation methodology. In addition to
illustrating the summary tables, conclusions and recommendations for further
analysis are presented here.
-------
A. 2 Emission Sources
A.2.1 Residential Fuel Combustion Emissions
To gain a better understanding of the sensitivity of area source
(e.g., residential fuel combustion, commercial/institutional fuel combustion
and solid waste incineration) emission calculations to the choice of alloca-
tion Order, residential fuel combustion emissions were computed for 1970,
using each of the three Orders. While there was no significant difference
in the estimates of countywide fuel use when treated by the different Orders,
the Order 3 estimates of fuel combustion for particular subareas were different
*•
from those derived from the Order 1 and 2 computations. Therefore, because the
Order 3 calculation typically yields a more accurate characterization of fuel
use for particular subareas, it should be preferred wherever data and resources
permit its use.
Fulton County's residential fuel combustion emissions were projected
for 1975, 1980, and 1985 using an Order 3 analysis. The number of dwelling units
in each of seven municipalities within Fulton County was obtained for 1970
from the 1972 County and City Databook, and projections for the number of
households in these subareas for 1975, 1980, and 1985 were taken from com-
puter output supplied by the Atlanta Regional Commission (ARC). Growth
factors for the five-year periods 1970-75, 1975-80, and 1980-85 were then
computed for the households in each subarea. Table A. 2-1 enumerates the raw
'household data and the growth factors that were developed from them. These
growth factors were then sequentially applied to the 1970 dwelling-unit base
data to project the number of dwelling units in each subarea for 1975, 1980,
and 1985. Thus, by making the assumption that the number of households mirrors
the number of dwelling units, it was possible to carry out the Order 3 com-
putation.
Residential building size and fuel use distributions were obtained
from the 1970 Census of Housing. As it was not possible to obtain these data
from the ARC Data Center, the building size and fuel use distributions were
held constant from 1970 through 1985. The fuel combustion emission factors
taken from The Compilation of Air Pollutant Emission Factors (AP-42) were also
held constant over the study period. Therefore, because it was assumed that
the number of dwelling units changed, proportionate to the five-year growth
rates, emissions were sequentially calculated for each forecast year as the
3
-------
Table A.2-1
Total Households and Growth Factors
Fulton County, Georgia
Subareas
Atlanta
Fairburn
Hapeville
Rosswell
Union City
East Point
College Park
SUBAREA TOTAL
Residual
FULTON COUNTY
TOTAL
• •• • • \
Households
1970
148,750
1,211
3,517
2,326
1,893
13,005
5,446
176,151
21,401
197,552
Growth
Factor
1970-75
1.04
1.36
1.06
1.47
1.50
1.16
1.35
1.08
1.52
1.12
Households
1975
155,113
1,642
3,747
3,428
2,840
15,156
7,356
189,282
32,538
221,820
Growth
Factor
1975-80
1.04
1.26
1.06
1.32
1.33
1.14
1.26
1.07
1.23
1.11
Households
1980
161,473
2,074
3,977
4,531
3,787
17,306
9,267
202,415
43,674
246,089
Growth
Factor
1980-85
1.07
1.40
1.04
1.32
1.32
1.09
1.12
1.09
1.47
1.16
Households
1985
173,383
2,913
4,152
6,035
4,998
18,874
10,356
220,711
64,151
284,862
Households
1990
185,293
3,752
4,328
7,539
6,210
20,441
11,444
239,007
84,628
323,635
Growth factors were not confuted for the five-year period 1985-90. The 1990 data were used only to
interpolate the projected number of households for 1985.
-------
product of the growth rate and emissions from the previous year beginning with
1970 as the base year. The 3.1-9 Tables illustrate Fulton County emissions
distributed among the seven municipalities and the Residual for 1970 and
1975.
Minor problems were encountered in trying to determine the geographic
compatibility between municipalities as defined by the U.S. Bureau of the
Census and ARC, and it was necessary to assume a one-to-one relationship be-
tween household and dwelling unit growth rates. Nevertheless, we feel that
this Order 3 analysis provided more realistic estimates of emissions for the
particular municipalities than would have been the case if Orders 1 and 2 had
been used. We would, therefore, encourage prospective users to make similar
assumptions if they lead to the use of data that facilitate the application
of Order 3.
-------
Table 3.1-9
Residential Fuel Combustion Emissions
Allocated to Subc-ounty Areas
Fulton
A. County
3. Year 1970
C. Allocation Order
(1)
Sub area
Atlanta
Fairburn
Eapeville
Rosswell
Union City
East Poiat
College Park
S 13 AREA TOTAL
Residual
D. COUNTY TCTTAL
missions
(tons/yr)
(2)
Part.
146.74
2.16
7.15
3.37
1.74
26.02
2.77
189.96
51.52
241,48
(3)
^x
197.75
6.13
20.21
9.54
4.91
73.51
.09
312.16
'.-45.85
457.99
(4)
CO
136.36
1.63
5.57
2.62
1.36
20.28
2.92
170.73
40.11
210.84
(5)
HCa
(6)
<
«*.
•
Q
These pollutants have T?een excluded from this analysis as they will
be treated on an AQCR basis.
-------
Table 3.1-9
Residential Fuel Combustion Emissions
Allocated to Subcounty Areas
Fulton
A. County
3. Year '.
C. Allocation Order
1975
Emissions
(1)
Subarea
Atlanta
Fairburn
Hapeville
Rosswell
Union City
East Point
College Park
5U3ASEA TOTAL
Residual
D. COUNTY TOTAL
(tons/yr)
(2)
Part.
153.05
2.93
7.61
4.97
2.61
30.31
3.74
205.22
78.31
283.53
(3)
^x
206.25
8.31
21.52
14.06
7.36
85.64
.12
343.26
221.69
564.95
(4)
CO
142.22
2.21
5.93
3.86
2.04
23.63
3.94
183.83
60.97
244.80
(5)
HCa
(6)
»«•
ihese pollutants have been excluded from this analysis as they will be
treated on an AQCR basis.
-------
A.2.2 Transportation Emissions
An Order 1 analysis was used to project and allocate transportation
emissions in Fulton County because more detailed data needed to carry out
the higher Order calculations could not be obtained and implemented within
the time frame of the case study. This analysis was confined to limited and
non-limited access highways, and we feel that the motor vehicle emissions
estimates are conservative (i.e., high), because the method used to forecast
emissions was not adjusted to consider the existence and/or expansion of
the Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit System (MARTA) or the construction of
any additional highway or arterial street links. Therefore, the emission
forecasts for 1975, 1980, and 1985 are not expected to be representative of
the actual situation in Fulton County, Georgia.
Necessary forecasts of Vehicle Miles Traveled (YMT) were derived from
population projections. Population data for Fulton County and each of the
seven municipalities used as subareas for the residential fuel combustion
analysis were obtained for 1970, 1980, and 1990 from ARC. Population growth
rates were then calculated for each of the three five-year intervals (1970-75,
1975-80, and 1980-85) by interpolating from the decade-based data, such that
the percentage growth in the first five years equaled the percentage growth
in the second five years. These population growth rates for the Fulton County
subareas are shown in Table A.2-2.
VMT for limited and non-limited access highways were derived from
the population forecasts using 1970 as the base. VMT for each limited access
highway link was then calculated successively for each projection year (1975,
1980, and 1985) by multiplying VMT from the previous year (beginning with 1970)
by the countywide population growth rate for the appropriate five-year inter-
val. Thus, annual miles driven on limited access highways for each vehicle
class is assumed to increase at the same rate as total population growth
in the county, and the volume on every highway link is assumed to grow at
these same rates. Growth in VMT for non-limited access highways was also linked
to population growth. But instead of keying it to estimates of countywide
population growth, non-limited access highway links were specifically located
in the seven municipalities or treated as rural road links. In this way
YMT increases for non-limited access highways were broken down and projected
according to growth rates for the specific subareas considered (e.g., munici-
palities) .
8
-------
Table A. 2-2
Population Growth Factors:
Fulton County, Georgia
Subareas 1970-75 1975-80 1980-85
Atlanta
Fairburn
Hapeville
Ros swell
Union City
East Point
College Park
SUBAREA TOTAL
Residual
.97
1.47
1.02
1.64
1.11
1.42
1.01
1.33
.96
1.48
1.03
1.65
1.11
1.41
1.02
1.33
1.04
1.33
.98
1.32
1.28
.99
1.06
1.05
1.45
FULTON COUNTY
TOTAL 1.05 1.05 1.13
-------
The above procedures were implemented merely as substitutes for
State Highway Department projections of VMT that could not be obtained in time
to prepare the Fulton County example. Due to extensive transportation plan-
ning at the state and county levels and the Federal Highway Administration
3-C planning requirements, it is unlikely that similar deficiencies of data
will occur where the Subcounty Emission Allocation procedures are to be
applied. Therefore, it is not recommended that forecasts be developed using
the procedure employed here, because the effects of all known changes, such
as Atlanta's new transit system (MARTA) and proposed highway construction,
should be accounted for in any forecast of VMT.
Two additional assumptions were employed in the Fulton County test
case. These are more generally applicable to the country as a whole, and
we recommend their use where data are lacking for a specific county under
study. First, the national average vehicle age distribution from the
Compilation of Air Pollutant Emission Factors (AP-42), weighted by annual
miles driven in Fulton County, was applied to all forecast years. We
reasoned that the vehicle age distribution will change in the future but
such modified projections could not be obtained. Second, the speed cor-
rection factors for limited access highways were also determined using AP-42
and the average speed for these highways was assumed to be 45 mph, which is a
conservative estimate.
As an overall assessment of these estimates for mobile source emis-
sions, correlation analyses conducted at Argonne have indicated that popu-
lation is a rather strong predictor of VMT. Based on these results, the
emission estimates developed in this population-based analysis are judged to
be as refined as the Order 1 procedure will permit under the conditions
specified above. The availability of more refined highway data and a mobile
source emissions model would undoubtedly yield more accurate predictions of
transportation emissions than has been possible here. The 3.2-11 Table illus-
trates the summary allocation of transportation emissions to subareas of Fulton
County for 1980.
10
-------
Table 3.2-11
Transportation Emissions
Allocated to Subcounty Areas
A. County Fulton
B. Year loan
C. Allocation Order i
Emissions
(tons/yr)
(1)
Subarea
Atlanta
Fairburn
Hapeville
Rosswell
Union City
East Point
College Park
SUBAREA TOTAL
Residual
D. COUNTY TOTAL
(2)
Part.
527.0
8.3
12.6
18.4
15.9
60.1
30.9
672.8
204.0
876.8
(3)
S0x
202.2
3.2
4.9
7.1
6.1
23.2
11.9
259.3
78.6
337.9
(4)
CO
31975.8
492.6
748.4
1100.4
945.0
3585.7
1833.7
40681.5
12208,2
52889.7
(5)
HCa
(6)
NO a
j\
These pollutants have been excluded from this analysis as they will be
treated on an AQCR basis.
11
-------
A.2.3 Commercial/Institutional Fuel Combustion Emissions
An Order 2 analysis was performed to allocate emissions resulting
from the combustion of fuel used to heat commercial and institutional build-
ings in Fulton County. This was chosen as the highest Order of analysis
feasible because the building size and fuel use distributions required for
an Order 3 analysis were not available. Therefore, the allocated emissions
derived from this investigation are characteristic of those that can be
anticipated from the intermediate level of detail.
To obtain projections of commercial/institutional employment neces-
sary for the Order 2 analysis, data were obtained from ARC and the 1972
County and City Databook. The employment projections supplied by ARC were
provided in the form of computer output displaying the total number of employees
for 1970, 1980 and 1990 in each of ten Superdistricts that comprise Fulton
County. These Superdistricts were listed as follows:
Number Designation
10 Atlanta, CBD
11 Atlanta, Northeast
12 Atlanta, Northwest
13 Atlanta, Southeast
14 Atlanta, Southwest
15 Tri-Cities
16 South Fulton
17 Atlanta, Buckhead
18 Sandy Springs
19 North Fulton
As a first step the total number of employees for 1970, 1980 and 1990 were
interpolated to obtain estimates of 1975 and 1985 employment for the County
and each of the Superdistricts.
Since the ARC data enumerated only the total number of employees, it
was necessary to estimate the number of persons employed in commercial and
institutional establishments, based on 1970 employment percentages enumerated
in the Databook. The percentage of commercial/institutional employees was
developed for the county and municipalities with 1970 populations of 25,000 or
more, by summing the employment percentages for wholesale and retail trade,
services and educational services available in the Databook. Because the
12
-------
applicable information in the Databook pertained only to municipalities with
1970 populations of 25,000 or more, the commercial/institutional employment
percentages were applied to the various Superdistricts in the following way.
A constant commercial/institutional percentage was applied to each of the
six Atlanta Superdistricts (numbers 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 17). By the same
token, the commercial/institutional employment percentage obtained for East
Point was applied to the Tri-Cities Superdistrict (Number 15).* Using the
total number of employees from the ARC data and the employment percentages
derived from the Databook, the number of commercial/institutional employees
were calculated for the County as a whole and for Superdistricts 10, 11, 12
13, 14, 15 and 17. These numbers were obtained for each area by multiplying
the total number of employees by the commercial/institutional employment
percentage. The 1970 commercial/institutional employment percentage was
uniformly applied to the total number of employees for 1970 and each forecast
year (1975, 1980 and 1985) to obtain the number of commercial/institutional
employees for each year under investigation. This calculation is summarized
in formula (1).
(1) CLE±. = TEi;j x
where:
CIE.. = Commercial/institutional employees in Superdistrict
1-J (or County) i in year j.
TE. = Total employees in Superdistrict (or county) i in
year j.
PCIE.,g70 = Percent of employment in commercial and institutional
establishments in Superdistrict (or county) i in 1970,
Although there are three municipalities (College Park, East Point and Hape-
ville) located in this Superdistrict, only East Point had a 1970 population
greater than 25,000 and was therefore the only place for which data were
enumerated in the 1972 County and City Databook.
13
-------
The remaining Superdistricts (e.g., numbers 16, South Fulton; 18,
Sandy Springs; and 19, North Fulton) were treated as the Residual for
Fulton County because the necessary commercial/institutional employment per-
centages for these areas could not be obtained from the Databook. Thus, the
number of employees treated in this Residual had to be estimated from the county
total and Superdistricts already considered. The commercial/institutional
employees for Superdistricts 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 and 17 were summed and
this result was subtracted from the total number of commercial/institutional
employees for Fulton County to obtain the commercial/institutional employees
for the Residual.
The number of employees used to generate the proportions by which
commercial/institutional emissions were allocated are shown in Table A.2-3.
The 3.3-11 Table illustrates allocated commercial/institutional fuel com-
bustion emissions for 1975.
14
-------
Table A.2-3
Commercial/Institutional Employment:
Fulton County, Georgia
SD
10
11
12
13
14
17
15
# Name
Atlanta,
CBD
Atlanta,
.» Northeast
^ Atlanta,
Northwest
Atlanta,
Southeast
Atlanta,
Southwest
Atlanta,
Buckhead
Tri-Cities
3
Residual
FULTON COUNTY
TOTAL
1970
41,877
37,957
21,211
18,619
14,800
13,798
16,511
4,858
169,631
1975
45,091
, 38,150
23,736
19,641
16,064
15,801
18,151
10,664
187,298
1980
48,305
38,342
26,261
20,663
17,329
17,804
19,790
16,470
204,964
1985
50,925
38,777
29,249
22,046
20,149
19,877
22,471
23,505
*
226,999
aThis residual is comprised of superdistricts #16 (South Fulton), #18 (Sandy Springs) and
#19 (North Fulton)
-------
Table 5.3-11
Cc—.ercial/Institutional Fuel Combustion Emissions
Allocated to Sib-County Areas
Fulton
A. County __
B- Year 1975
C. Allocation Order
(1)
Siibarea
10 CBD
11 - Northeast
12 - Northwest
13 - Southeast
14 - Southwest
15 - Tri-Cities
17 - Buckhead
S'JEASEA TOTAL
Residual
D. COUNTY TOTAL
Emissions
(tons/yr)
(2)
Part.
55.95
47.12
29.48
24.57
19.96
22.53
19.51
218.92
13.23
232.15
(3)
SOx
85.02
71.59
44.80
37.02
50.35
34.22
29.63
332.63
20.09
552.72
(4)
GO
47.25
39.8Q
24.90
20.58
16.86
19.02
16.47
184.88
11.17
196.05
(5)
HC?
(6)
»/
pollutants have been excluded from this analysis as they will
be treated on an AQCR basis.
16
-------
A. 2. 4 Industrial Process and Fuel Combustion Emissions
It was impossible to survey the management of industrial sources in
Fulton County regarding their plans for expanding existing facilities or
constructing plants at new sites. Therefore, the direct application of an
Order 3 analysis could not be achieved and features of Orders 2 and 3 have
been combined to yield the most extensive analysis possible. This approach
illustrates options that are available to the innovative user who wants to
obtain refined estimates of industrial emissions, but who is constrained
because the detailed field survey information required for an Order 3 analysis
is lacking.
Ideally, the purest application of an Order 3 analysis requires that
the proposed size (i.e., anticipated employment levels) and location of new
industrial sources be known. Since field surveys could not be administered,
projections of new source employment levels were not available for Fulton
County. Therefore, the growth of new point sources was estimated on the basis
of growth in industrial land use, and emissions attributable to the construction
of new plants were allocated according to these subarea-specific changes in
industrial land use. Land use data were obtained from ARC for each of the
ten areas called Superdistricts that comprise Fulton County (see Section A. 2. 3
of this Appendix for a list of these Superdistricts) . These data provided an
inventory of used acreage for 1970 as well as projections of used land for
1980 and 1990. After interpolating to obtain projections of the total land
area projected to be in use for 1975 and 1985, the number of acres devoted to
industrial activity in each Superdistrict was calculated. This industrial land
area was obtained for each year under investigation (1970, 1975, 1980 and 1985)
by multiplying the total acreage of used land in each Superdistrict by the
percent of used acreage devoted to industrial activity in each Superdistrict.
Formula (2) summarizes this calculation.
(2) ^ = TAl^ x PAUi x
where
^ = Industrial acreage in Superdistrict i
TAUi= Total acres used in Superdistrict i.
PAU^= Percent of acreage used in Superdistrict i.
^= Percent of total acreage used, devoted to industrial
activity in Superdistrict i.
17
-------
The Superdistrict -specific change in industrial acreage was then computed
for the five-year intervals 1970-75, 1975-80 and 1980-85 by subtracting the
industrial acreage for each forecast year from the industrial acreage for
the baseline year (1970) . This calculation is summarized by formula (3) .
(3)
where A^ii = Ch^g® ^n industrial acreage for Superdistrict i
J between forecast year j and 1970.
IAii = Industrial acreage for Superdistrict i in forecast
J year j.
IAi 1970 = Industrial acreage for Superdistrict i in 1970.
To allocate the forecast -year- specific change in industrial land among the
various Superdistricts , the results obtained from the application of
formula (2) were divided by the difference in the countywide industrial
acreage between 1970 and the forecast year in question. The calculation
for this industrial land use growth factor is illustrated in formula (4) .
where :
AAREA.. . = Change in industrial land area apportioned to Superdistrict
1J i for forecast year j.
AIA- - = Change in industrial acreage for Superdistrict i between
3 forecast year j and 1970.
TIA- = Total industrial acreage for Fulton County in forecast year j
TIA,g70 = Total industrial acreage for Fulton County in 1970.
This subarea-specific growth factor for industrial land use was then used to
allocate emissions attributable to the siting of new point sources in each
Superdistrict. The industrial acreage and land use growth factor for each of
the ten Fulton County Superdistricts is shown in Table A. 2-4.
18
-------
Table A.2-4
Industrial Land Use Change
Fulton County, Georgia
Subareas
10 Atlanta,
CBD
11 Atlanta,
Northeast
12 Atlanta,
Northwest
13 Atlanta,
Southeast
14 Atlanta,
Southwest
15 Tri-Cities
16 South
Fulton
17 Atlanta,
Buckhead
18 Sandy
Springs
19 North
Fulton
FULTON COUNTY
TOTAL
Industrial Land Usea
(ACRES)
1970
133
795
1665
1137
930
825
216
125
121
88
6035
1975
132
735
1759
1151
1006
846
420
146
169
145
6509
1980
132
675
1852
1165
1082
868
623
167
216
203
6983
1985
131
707
1956
1198
1182
912
795
195
255
326
7657
1970-75
-0.002
-0.126
0.198
0.030
0.160
0.044
0.430
0.044
0.101
0.120
474
Industrial Land
1975-80
-0.001
-0.127
0.197
0.030
0.160
0.045
0.429
0.045
0.100
0.121
948
Use Change
1980-85
-0.001
-0.054
0.179
0.038
0.155
0.054
0.357
0.043
0.147
0.147
1622
^uivalent to IA specified in formula (1).
rt AARF.A snecified in formula (3).
-------
Using identification coordinates listed in the National Emissions Data
Systems (NEDS), all point sources were located on a map of Fulton County indi-
cated with Universal Transmercator (UTM) grid tics and boundaries of the 10
ARC Superdistricts. These sources were then grouped within each Superdistrict
according to industrial process categories delineated in the QBERS projections
of economic activity. Each source's pollutant-specific emissions for the base
year (1970) were then recorded from the NEDS file for Fulton County onto the
appropriate working tables. Next, the total emissions for each source were
calculated for each forecast year (1^75, 1980, and 1985). This was accom-
plished by multiplying the source's 1970 baseline emissions by the growth
factor for its industrial process category determined from the OBERS pro-
jections for the Atlanta SMSA. Emissions attributable to the construction of
sources at new locations were estimated on the basis of the five-year growth
rate for the number of acres devoted to industrial land in each of the ten
Superdistricts. These new source emissions were calculated for each process
category by multiplying the total emissions in each Superdistrict by the
industrial land use growth factor (AAREA..) described above. This rather
intricate procedure had the effect of apportioning the estimated growth in
industrial emissions between existing (in situ) sources and the construction
of plants at new sites. Therefore, this application illustrates the Order 3
allocation of industrial emissions but relies on an estimate of growth at
new sites, which is characteristic of the Order 2 procedure.
Two problems worth mentioning were encountered in the application of
this procedure. In, the first place it was necessary to assume that the point
-n
source emissions fdt any given forecast year could not be less than the base-
line year emissions for that source. In the special case(s) where projected
emissions at existing sources were smaller than the 1970 emissions for a given
source(s) (due to the subtraction of new source emissions that were larger than
the total projected, emission for that year), the 1970 baseline year emissions,
instead of estimated new source emissions, were subtracted from the total fore-
casted emissions. Projected emissions for an existing point source were
thereby constrained so that they were at least equal to that point source's
emissions for the baseline year. In the second instance where an industrial
land use change factor (AAREA.) was negative for a given Superdistrict, zeros
were entered for new source growth and all of the total emissions were allocated
to existing sources.
20
-------
Tables 3.4-4 and 3.4-8 respectively summarize the 1985 industrial
process and industrial fuel combustion emissions allocated to the various
Superdistrict subareas.
21
-------
Table 3.4-4
Industrial Point and New Source Process
Emissions - Subarea Summary
A. Ccvnty FULTON
»• ?*"«• SUMMARY
c- Ye*r - L ^ .
0. Allocation Onlcr
»iBAW;A
ID
10
II
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
COUNTY TOTAL
roiOT .sxiuu (MISSIONS
*J.2W
samas
4
10
8
5
2
1
o
1
0
0
48
ID
»>F
(4)
prtT
2114
11195
9681
35
2
1056
577
2
0
0
24700
IS)
!*\
491
109
312
75
14
56
363
0
0
0
1422
101
so^
1625
2087
1247
27
2
710
22
0
0
0
5720
i ••]
Hcax
(8)
on a
sw snider. ORSSIONS
(9)
I-J4P
\ 1
(10)
P,\RT
0
0
2115
1
0
60
321
0
0
0
2489
(ID
NOX
0
0
68
2
2
3
201
0
0
0
274
(U)
SO,
0
0
272
1
0
40
12
0
0
0
325
(13)
ic a
(ii)
ooa
TOTAI. IM r.sif'-c;
(IS)
IWP
(161
PAITI
2114
11195
11796
36
2
1116
898
2
0
0
27189
i' 17)
N^X
491
109
380
77
16
59
564
0
0
0
1696
(H)
*v
1625
2087
1519
28
2
750
34
0
0
0
6045
(19J
nc a
CO)
co a
to
Nl
pollutants have been excluded from this analysis as they will be treated on an AQCR basis.
-------
*• o°u.ty FULTON
5-
D. Allocation (Wer'
Table 3.4-8
Industrial Point and New Source Fuel
Combustion Emissions - Subarea Summary
SURAKM
(I)
10
it
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
COUNTY TOTAL
POINl SUH:.T (MISSIONS
No^ct
^Hinn-x
1
2
1
1
0
0
2
0
0
0
7
LV!
rift
3528
13
2859
II
0
0
23
0
0
0
6434
w.
484
100
268
345
0
0
291
0
0
0
I486
HV
I53<*
46
837
2
0
0
3
0
0
0
2422
QJ
l*-a
®a
xuv axiRiT. iMissi(«is
T&
HIM
rim
0
0
625
0
0
0
-12
0
0
0
637
«tj
0
0
59
14
0
0
162
0
0
0
235
«£>
0
0
183
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
184
l^a
(^a
1OTAL IMIJoloV-
^
^
3528
13
3484
II
0
0
35
0
0
0
7071
Hi!
484
100
327
359
0
0
453
0
0
0
1723
as
1534
46
1020
2
0
0
4
0
0
0
2606
flSTa
-fir*
now
QD»
tsi
04
pollutants have been excluded from this analysis as they will be treated on an AQCR basis.
-------
A.2.5 Solid Waste Incineration Emissions
Emissions generated from the incineration of solid waste were allo-
cated to subcounty areas using an Order 2 analysis. This Level of detail was
selected because the survey of local solid waste officials needed for an
Order 3 analysis could not be undertaken as part of the Fulton County test
case. Furthermore, the intensive study prescribed in Projecting County
Emissions: Volume 7 of the Guidelines was not carried out. Estimates of the
countywide solid waste incineration were instead taken directly from the
Atlanta Air Pollutant Emission Inventory (October, 1969) and entered in Table
3.5-2 as described in the procedural instructions. In view of the fact that
residential solid waste incineration was not considered in this Inventory, it
has also been deleted from this analysis. This exclusion should not, however,
create undue concern as residential refuse incineration is generally considered
to account for only a very small portion of the emissions from open burning.
In short, it can be said that the allocation results obtained from this
analysis are as representative of the actual situation in Fulton County as
could be expected without projecting solid waste incineration Levels, using
the procedures described in Volume 7 of the Guidelines.
All of the fundamental work involved in manipulating the demographic
and land use variables used to project solid waste emissions has already been
carried out for the analyses of other emission sources. Residential inciner-
ation has been deleted so that the population allocations (developed for the
analysis of transportation emissions) were not needed. The commercial/insti-
tutional establishments and industrial point sources have already been treated
according to ARC Superdistricts that are compatible. Therefore, the commercial/
institutional and industrial land use allocation proportions derived from the
assumptions, specified in Sections A.2.3 and A.2.4 of this appendix, have been
directly applied to this analysis of solid waste incineration emissions. One
minor adaptation was necessary, however. To make the commercial/institutional
and industrial subarea designations completely compatible, Superdistricts 16,
18 and 19, which were treated separately for industrial sources, have been
aggregated and treated as the Residual for this analysis.
The following 3.5-4 Table illustrates the allocated refuse incinera-
tion emissions for 1980.
24
-------
Table 3.5-4
Solid Waste Incineration Emissions
Allocated to Subcounty Areas
Fulton
A. County
B. Year "
C. Allocation Order
1980
(1)
Sub-areas
10 - CBD .
11 - Northeast
12 - Northwest
13 . Southeast
14 - Southwest
15 - Tri-Cities
17 - Buckhead
SUBAREA TOTAL
Residual
D. cawn TOTAL
Emissions
(tons/yr)
(2)
Part.
529
966
1,985
1,286
1,179
991
308
7,244
1,130
8,374
(3)
^x
78
104
175
116
105
92
38
708
100
808
(4)
CO
208
193
199
143
125
124
82
1,074
119
1,193
(5)
HCa
(6)
<
pollutants have been excluded from this analysis as they will
be treated on an AQCR basis.
25
-------
A. 3 MASTER GRIDDING
To this point emissions from the five types of sources have been allo-
cated to essentially two types of subarea sets. Residential fuel combustion
and transportation emissions have been allocated to municipalities and a
Residual. Industrial emissions have been allocated to ARC Superdistricts and
a Residual was not necessary; and commercial/institutional fuel combustion
and solid waste incineration emissions were allocated to ARC Superdistricts
and a Residual. While there is no conceptual problem with treating these
different subarea sets separately for dispersion modeling purposes, the
overlap between the subareas presents a rather confusing picture as to
where emission control strategies should be implemented. Therefore, we have
followed our previous recommendation and developed a single master grid
network so that the emissions from all of the previous analyses could be
totaled for each cell in the square-gridded matrix.
Fulton County was subdivided into 123 cells using a two-stage
gridding procedure applied to census tract maps of the Atlanta Standard
Metropolitan Statistical Area (SMSA) on which the ARC Superdistrict boundaries
were indicated. The resulting grid system is shown in Figures A.I and A.2.
Figure A.I represents the master census tract map and Figure A.2 is a blow-up
of the census tracts for "INSERT A" specified in Figure A.I. Since two maps
were needed to show the resolution of census tracts in and around Atlanta, one
grid network had to be drawn on the larger-scale map and another grid had to
be drawn on the smaller-scale map. This accounts for the two-stage operation
mentioned above.
The master grid system was developed in the following way. First,
clear Mylar plastic was overlayed on both of the maps and identical Universal
Transverse Mercator (UIM) coordinates were marked on each overlay. For example,
26 25
UTM coordinate 37 — 7 can be seen on both maps and designates an interface
between them. Next, the scales of gridding resolution were decided upon and
the cell networks were drawn on both maps. Since outlying areas have com-
paratively low population densities and concentrations of emission generating
activity, 8 km x 8 km grid squares were chosen. These larger grid cells are
evident in Figure A.I and they cover the three Superdistricts surrounding
Atlanta (e.g., 16, South Fulton; 18, Sandy Springs; and 19, North Fulton). The
8 km x 8 km grid cells do not apply to "INSERT A," but was also gridded with
the uniform cells to avoid confusion in drawing the complete matrix on the
26
-------
17 725 7 33 7*1 749 757 765 773
37
90 I
BOUNDARY SYMBOLS
CENSUS TRACT BOUNDARIES
COUNTY
4
I . .
KILOMETERS
CORPORATE LIMIT
CENSUS TRACT DIVISION
SUPER DISTRICT
Figure A.I Master Grid Overlay
27
-------
BOUNDARY SYMBOLS
CENSUS TRACT BOUNDARIES
COUNTY
CORPORATE LIMIT
CENSUS TRACT DIVISION
SUPER DISTRICT
SANDY SPRINGS
(SOUfTH) „.
01234
I I i I I
Figure A.2 Master Grid Overlay: Insert
28
-------
master census tract. Figure A.2 shows that varying degrees of resolution
in gridding were chosen for the seven Superdistricts in, and contiguous to,
Atlanta. In the course of generating the cell matrix for Figure A. 2 the map
was originally divided into 8 km squares that were continually subdivided
until the desired resolution was obtained. The Atlanta CBD was subdivided
into the smallest cells (1 km square) and the areas of lesser concentrated
activity around the CBD were divided into 2 km squares. The lower density,
western and northwestern parts of Atlanta were divided into 4 km squares
and the northeastern portion was divided into two 8 km squares.
After completing this gridding procedure on the census tract/Super-
district maps the identical grid network was applied to a Fulton County map
with municipalities indicated on it. In this way the subareas treated in
the analyses of residential fuel combustion and transportation emissions
were distributed to the appropriate cells of the grid network.
The final step of the master gridding procedure involved estimating
portions of the various subcounty areas located in each of the master grid
cells. To insure accuracy this apportioning was done with a planimeter and
the fractional estimates for each subarea set were recorded in the 4.1 Tables.
Examples of these 4.1 Tables for the residential fuel combustion-transportation
and commercial/institutional-industrial-solid waste subarea sets are provided
below.
Although the 123 cell network involved a considerable amount of effort
in gridding and apportioning the various subareas, we feel that it provides
optimal resolution for modeling air quality from the allocated emissions for
Fulton County. This grid system is neither more refined than the original
data sets would permit nor so gross that it destroys resolution achieved
by the separate analyses.
29
-------
Table 4.1
Master Grid Mapping
A. County Fulton
B. Suboounty Area Set Residential. Transportation
(1)
Master Grid
Designation
3736 - 733
-736 . ?35
3736 . 737
3737 . ?39
3737 . ,40
3736 . 739
,,36 ,40
o/ • /
3736 . ?41
373.6 . ?47
3734 - 739
S734 - 741
3734 . ?43
3734 . 745
3734 - 737
3732 . ?39
(2)
Subcounty Area
Designation
Atlanta
v
(5)
Fraction of Suboounty
Area, in Master Grid
.013
.013
.013
.003
.003
.003
.003
.003
.003
.013
.013
.013
.005
.013
.009
30
-------
Table 4.1
Master Grid Mapping
A. County Fulton
B. Subcounty Area set Conmercial/Institutional-Industrial-Solid Waste
(1)
Muter Grid
Designation
J738 . ?41
3739 . ?41
3736 - 739
J736 . ?40
3?36 . 741
J736. . ?42
J736 . 743
3736 . .,45
3734 . 739
3734 . ?41
3T34 - 743
3734 - 745
3?34 . 737
3732 - 737
3732 - 739
(2)
Subcounty Area
Designation
12-NW
12-NW
13-SE
(3) 1
raction or ouocounvy •
Area, in Master Grid
.004
.001
.002
.010
.015
.015
.030 !
.012
.035
.061
.061 1
.024
.002
.012
.061
31
-------
A. 4 Master Grid Emissions
This last section of Appendix A briefly illustrates some of the final
results from the Fulton County test case. Also described is an additional tech-
nique not treated in the text of Volume 13. This technique involves generating
a table that shows how total emissions for each pollutant are distributed among
the five sources in each grid square.
The 4.2 Tables included below show the final allocated emissions for
grid squares 46 through 75 for each of the four years under study (1970, 1975,
1980 and 1985). These summary pages of the test case were selected for presen-
tation because, as will be seen later, total 1970 emissions were disaggregated
by source for grid squares 58, 59, 67 and 68. Therefore, the 4.2 Tables pro-
vide a reference for these grids and also show emission projection results for
a range of grids in Fid ton County. By following through the 4.2 Tables for a
given grid square, one can see that the pollutant-specific emissions are, for
the most part, growing between the five-year intervals. The major deficiency
in simply inspecting the 4.2 Tables, however, is that the user cannot determine
what sources account for major portions of the total emissions for each pollutant,
In other words, the 4.2 Tables do not directly address the basic issue behind
Air Quality Maintenance Planning; what emission control strategies should be
implemented in a particular area (e.g., grid square)?
To overcome this deficiency, a closer examination of grid squares with
high emission concentrations that signify specific air quality problems is
strongly recommended. Total emissions tabulated in the 4.2 Tables should
be disaggregated by source. A disaggregation of 1970 emissions is shown in
Table A.4 for grids 58, 59, 67 and 68. These grids were selected for this
demonstration because they are all 4-square-km cells and near the Atlanta CBD.
While these four grids do not have the highest emission rates in Fulton County,
they were selected as representative of the 2 km x 2 km squares that were
developed for most of the county.
From Table A. 4 it is readily evident that transportation accounts for
the heavy concentrations of CO emissions in the four areas near the Atlanta
CBD. In each case, automotive vehicles account for over 99% of an average CO
level of 1713 tons/yr. Hence, a transportation plan designed to reduce VMT
would be an appropriate strategy for lowering CO emissions in these areas.
32
-------
A. Cbunty
B. Year 1970
Table 4.2
Master Grid Bnissions
(1)
Uaster Grid
Designation
46. 3730- 743
47. 3730- 745
48. 3752 - 723
49. 3752- 727
50. 3732- 731
51. 3732- 755
52. 37" - 737
53. 37*2- 7&
54. 37" - 741
55. 373* - 7^
56. 3J«- 7^
5-. 37M - 703
58. 37» - 75/
55. 3734 - 759
60. S734- 7J1
Emissions
(tons/yr)
(2)
Part.
90.1
37.9
6.2
146.2
184.3
46.0
46.5
87.1
90.1
90.1
37.9
47.8
49.3
67.4
90.1
(3)
^x
15.7
11.5
2.9
24.0
36.6
7.9
5.4
14.0
15.7
15.7
6.4
9.8
10.0
12.6
15.7
(4)
CO
1718.3
661.4
296.8
2476.3
5865.2
5.0
5.8
1192.9
1718.3
1718.3
661.4
1711.9
1712.2
1715.1
1718.3
(5)
HC a
*
on
se pollutants have been excluded from this analysis as they vail be treated
an AQCR basis.
33
-------
A. Qpunty Fulton
B. Year 1970
Table 4.2
Muter Grid Emissions
(1)
>faster Grid
Designation
61. 37 34 - 743
62. 3734 - 745
,_ _-36 .23
oo. 3/ - 7
4
64. 3736 - 727
65. 37 36 - 731
66. 3756 - 733
6-. 373* - 733
6S. 3756 - 737
69. 37 36 - 739
70< 3736 - 7*0
71 3736 . 741
*
::. 3755 - 742
75. 5736 - 7*3
74. 3756 - 74S
„- -737 739
-o. o/ - /
Emissions
(tons/yr)
(2)
Part.
90.1
35.3
23.5
270.3
47.8
121.1
159.9
132.2
14.3
18.5
22.0
22.0
651.2
184.1
50.5
(3)
SOx
15.7
6.1
3.0
43.5
9.8
21.1
28.3
23.9
2.7
3.4
3.8
3.8
162.8
31.4
8.7
(A)
CO
1718.3
661.0
48.4
2325.3
1711.9
1712.9
1713.6
1713.2
395.5
396.2
396.7
396.7
2203.5
847.1
395.9
(5)a
HC
(6) a
>°x
pollutants have been excluded from this analysis as they will be treated on
an AQQR basis.
34
-------
A. county Fulton
B. Year
1975
Table 4.2
tester Grid Emissions
(1)
Master Grid
Designation
46. 3730. 743
47. 3730- 7 45
48. 3-32. ?23
49. 3-32- 727
50. 37 32- 7 31
51. 3732- 73S
5, 37 32- 7 37
(J — •
53. 3/32- 739
54. 3732- 741
55. 37'"- 7^
56. 5752- 74S
57. 37 34. 7 35
58. 37**- 7*
59. 37 54- 7 39
60. 37'4- ?41
Emissions
(tons/yr)
(2)
Part.
89.5
37.8
7.8
154.3
191.7
49.7
48.3
86.7
89.5
89.5
37.8
49.4
51.0
67.5
89.5
(3)
S0*
15.9
6.6
4.3
26.3
38.0
9.2
5.9
14.3
15.9
15.9
6.6
10.1
10.3
12.9
15.9
(4)
00
1016.9
391.6
307.1
1567.3
3492.2
5.5
6.3
707.6
1016.9
1016.9
391.6
1010.1
1010.4
1013.5
1016.9
&
(6).
mx
^These pollutants have been excluded from this analysis as they will be treated on
an AQCR basis.
35
-------
A. County Fulton
B- Year 1975
Table 4.2
Khster Grid Bnissions
(1)
Vaster Grid
Designation
01. 37 J4- 745
,_ 34 _ 45
62. 3/ - 7
63. 37 36- 7 23
64. 57 *- 727
65. 37 36- 751
66. 37 36. 7 35
67. 37 56. 7 35
68. 37 36. 7 37
69. 3? 36- 7^
70. *' 36- 740
7lf 37 56. 7 41
72> 37 36- 7 42
73. 3? ^ 7 43
74. 37 36- 7 45
75. 37 37. 7 39
Bnissions
(tons/yr)
(2)
Part.
89.5
35.1
25.1
303.4
49.4
138.9
186.0
152.0
14.9
18.7
21.8
21.8
720.0
208.8
59.1
(3)
^x
15.9
6.2
3.4
49.1
10.1
24.7
32.0
26.7
2.8
3.4
3.9
3.9
195.0
38.1
9.9
(4)
CO
1016.9
391.2
50.2
1469.8
1010.1
1011.2
1012.0
1011.5
233.6
234.3
234.9
234.9
1560.5
599.9
234.0
(5)a
HC
Cfi)a
^x
•
pollutants have been excluded from this analysis as they will be treated
on an AQCR basis.
36
-------
Table 4.2
tester Grid Emissions
A. County Fu*ton
B. Year 1980
(1)
\iister Grid
Designation
46 3730- 743
47. 37 50- 7*5
48. 37 32- 723
49. 37 52- 727
50. 37 32- 751
51. 37 32- 735
32. 37 52- 757
53. 37 52- 75*
5-1. 37 32- 741
55. 37 32- 743
56. 37 52- 74*
5-. 37 j4- 7^5
T7 O4_ 7 if
a:, zf - /
., ,, 54 , 59
D5. 37 - 7
60. 37 °4- 741
Emissions
(tons/yr)
(2)
Part.
91.2
38.5
8.7
165.1
203.1
54.1
51.0
88.5
91.2
91.2
38.5
52.2
53.7
69.3
91.2
(3)
^x
16.5
6.8
5.2
28.1
39.4
10.6
6.3
14.9
16.5
16.5
6.8
10.5
10.7
13.2
16.5
(4)
GO
430.0
163.9
160.3
687.2
1471.1
5.9
6.8
301.5
430.0
430.0
165.9
422.9
423.1
426.4
430.0
(5>a
HC a
(6)a
Wxa
ihese pollutants have been excluded from this analysis as they will be treated
on an AQCR basis.
37
-------
A. County Fulton
B. Year
1QQP
Table 4.2
tester Grid Emissions
(1)
.Nfaster Grid
Designation
61. 3734- 743
62. 3734. 745
63. 37 36- 723
64. 37 36- 727
53. 37 36- 751
66. 37 36- 733
57. 37 36- 7-30
65. 37 36. 7 37
09. 37 36. 7 59
70. 37 36- 7 40
71. 37 •*- 7 4i
72. 37 Jt)- 74/
73. 37 36. 7 4o
74. 37 56- 7 45
75. 37 57- 7 39
Emissions
(tons/yr)
(2)
Part.
91.2
35.8
27.0
345.7
52.2
162.2
219.6
178.1
15.6
19.2
22.4
22.4
856.3
243.3
70.3
(3)
^x
16.5
6.4
3.7
55.5
10.5
28.0
37.1
30.5
2.9
3.6
4.0
4.0
238.0
44.2
11.6
(4)
CO
430.0
165.6
27.9
646.6
422.9
424.0
425.0
424.4
98.1
98.1
99.5
99.5
1078.7
254.5
98.6
^a
HC a
'
&a
^x
^These pollutants have been excluded from this analysis as they will be treated
on an AQCR basis.
38
-------
A. County
B. Year ^1985
Table 4.2
^faster Grid Emissions
(1)
\iister Grid
Designation
46. 373° - 7W
47. 3730- 74S
43. 3732- 723
49. 3732- 7"
50. 3732- 7J1
SI. 3732- 733
;:. 373-- 70/
... ,732 . 739
3i. Jf - /
54. 3752- 74i
55. 37^- 74^
5S. 31M- 7*»
,704 7J3
3. . J/ /
5S. 37°4 - 7^7
5?. 3754- 739
6,\ 3734- 741
Emissions
(tons/yr)
(2)
Part.
94.1
39.7
11.5
181.5
220.2
59,9
55,2
91.4
94.1
94.1
39.7
46.4
57.9
63.4
94.1
(3)
^x
17.1
7,1
7.5
32.1
42.6
12.1
6.9
15.4
17.1
17.1
7.1
11.1
11.4
14.0
17.1
(4)
CO
286.0
110.6
180.7
515.2
986,5
7.1
7,5
202.2
286.0
286.0
110.6
278.1
278.4
281.9
286.0
0.
HCa
«•
These pollutants have been excluded from this analysis as they will be treated
on an AQCR basis.
39
-------
A. County Fulton
B- Year 1985
Table 4.2
Mister Grid Emissions
(1)
Vaster Grid
Designation
61, 3734 - T43
62. 3754 - T45
.65. 3T36- T23
64. 3756 - T27
65. 3756 - 731
66. 5736 - T33
67. 3T36 - T35
68. 5T56 - T37
69. 57°& - 7*y
70. 3r° - 7™
71. 37°6 - 741
72. 5?30 - 7»^
73. 5706 - 74j
74. 5r' - 74:)
75. s?~ - T39
Emissions
(tons/yr)
(2)
Part.
94.1
36.9
29.9
396.2
56.4
187.9
256.4
206.7
16.7
20.0
23,0
23.0
1013.3
306.6
82.3
(3)
^x
17.1
6.7
4.5
65.3
11.1
32.4
43.5
35.5
3.1
3.7
4.2
4.2
287.5
57.6
13.7
(4)
CO
286.0
110.1
31.4
484.7
278.1
279.5
280.4
279.8
64.7
65.5
66.2
66.2
1047.9
406.4
65.2
(5)a
HCa
(6)a
^
aThese pollutants have been excluded from this analysis as they will be treated on
an AQCR basis.
40
-------
Table A. 4
1970 Pollutant Specific Emissions for Individual Grids
Disaggregated by Source:
Fulton County, Georgia
Master Grid
Designation Source
58 3734-737
Residential
Transportation
Comner./Inst.
Industrial
Solid Waste
59 3734-739
Residential
Transportation
Commer./Inst.
Industrial
Solid Waste
67 3736-735
Residential
Transportation
Commer./Inst.
Industrial
Solid Waste
68 3736-737
Residential
Transportation
Commer./Inst.
Industrial
Solid Waste
Part.
Tons/yr %
49.3 100.0
2.0 4.1
7.7 15.6
0.7 1.4
0.1 0.2
38.8 78.7
67.4 100.0
2.0 3.0
7.7 11.4
1.0 1.5
0.8 1.2
55.9 82.9
159.9 100.0
2.0 1.3
7.7 4.8
1.0 0.6
97.5 61.0
51.7 32.3
132.2 100.0
2.0 1.5
7.7 5.8
0.8 0.6
73.3 55.5
48.4 36.6
S02
Tons/yr %
10.0 ,100.0
2.5 25.0
3.0 30.0
1.0 10.0
0.1 1.0
3.4 34.0
12.6 100.0
2.5 19.8
3.0 23.8
1.2 9.5
0.7 5.6
5.2 41.3
28.3 100.0
•jp 2 . 5 8.8
?3.0 10.6
1.3 4.6
17.1 60.4
4.4 15.6
23.9 100.0
2.5 10.5
3.0 12.5
1.3 5.4
12.9 54.0
4.2 17.6
CO
Tons/yr %
1712.2 lOO/O
1.6 0.1
1705.6 99.6
0.6 0.1
0.2 0.0
4.0 0.2
1715.1 100.0
1.6 0.1
1705.8 99.5
0.8 0.0
1.0 0.1
5.9 0.3
1713.6 100.0
1.6 0.1
1705.6 99.5
0.8 0.1
0.3 0.0
5.1 0.3
1713.2 100.0
1.6 0.1
1705.6 99.6
0.7 0.0
0.3 0.0
4.8 0.3
HC*
Tons/yr %
-
N0xa
Tons/yr %
pollutants have been excluded from this analysis as they will be treated on an AQCR basis.
-------
Particulates are the second major emission problem in grids 58, 59,
67 and 68. Unlike CO emissions, however, the particulate emissions are
attributable to more than one source. In grids 67 and 68 the particulate
problem has been traced to industrial, solid waste incineration, and trans-
portation, in that order. On the average these sources respectively account
for 581, 34% and 8% of the particulate emissions. Therefore, an adequate
Air Quality Maintenance Plan would have to be aimed at all three of these
sources in grids 67 and 68. Similarly, in grids 58 and 59 the particulate
problem can be traced to soli,d waste incineration and transportation sources
that respectively account for 81% and 8% of the particulate emissions. An
effective particulate maintenance plan would therefore have to address both
of these sources in grids 58 and 59.
The technique illustrated in Table A. 4 has not been included in the
procedures detailed in Volume 13 of the Guidelines because it involves a sub-
stantial effort that may not be warranted or necessary for all grid cells of
an AQCR county under study. However, where large concentrations of total
emissions are evident for a specific pollutant, it is strongly recommended
that the user trace the cause of these emissions back to their most signifi-
cant sources. Only by going through the process of obtaining results such as
those illustrated in Table A.4 can Air Quality Maintenance Plans be keyed
directly to specific sources of emissions.
42
-------
APPENDIX B
Trial Application of the Subcounty Emission Allocation Procedures
to Fill ton County, Georgia; Complete Documentation
B.I Introduction
This appendix provides complete documentation of the subcounty emis-
sion allocation test case summarized in Appendix A. Since Appendix A gave
only a summary of the results for Fulton County, Georgia, Appendix B provides
a detailed step by step analysis for each forecast year for each of the five
emission source categories. All of the tables used to generate the forecasted
emissions are included in this appendix.
The emission estimates shown in this appendix were computed to demon-
strate the subcounty emission allocation procedures prescribed in Volume 13 of
the Guidelines. The results document forecasted emissions derived from data
provided by the Atlanta Regional Commission (ARC) and the U.S. Census Bureau.
As such, the resulting emissions projections only approximate future condi-
tions that can be anticipated in Fulton County, Georgia. Local planning
agencies, the air pollution control board and the regional office of the USEPA
would undoubtedly have better information and a knowledge of previous growth
patterns that would facilitate a more accurate prediction of future emissions
than it has been possible to calculate here. Therefore, the emission fore-
casts presented do not necessarily represent the actual situation in the
Atlanta area and should not be construed as the final Air Quality Maintenance
Analysis for Fulton County, Georgia.
B.2 Emission Sources
43
-------
B.2.1 Residential Fuel Combustion Emissions
Residential Fuel Combustion
Allocation Procedure
ORDER 1
ATlocate fuel use by population distribution
ORDER 2
ftTlocate fuel use by dwelling unit distribution
ORDER 3
Compute fuel use in each subarea
44
-------
Allocation
Procedure
Sequence of Tables
Order 1
w Order 2
Order 3
3.1-2
3.1-3
3.1-4
3.1-5
3.1-6
3.1-7
3.1-8
3.1-9
Fig. 3.1-1 Residential Fuel Combustion Allocation Table Sequence
-------
ASSUMPTIONS AND LIMITATIONS OF THE EXAMPLE
FOR RESIDENTIAL FUEL COMBUSTION EMISSIONS
A. Growth in dwelling units was assumed to equal growth in the number of
households which were the only applicable data available in the data set
supplied by the Atlanta Regional Commission (ARC).
B. The residential building size distribution for 1970 was held constant
through all forecast years.
C. The residential fuel use distribution for 1970 was held constant through
all forecast years.
D. The residential fuel combustion emission factors were held constant from
1970 through 1985.
E. Residential emissions were calculated for each forecast year as the product
of the dwelling unit growth rate and emissions estimated sequentially from
the base year.
46
-------
Table 3.1-1
Population-Based Allocation Proportions for Subcounty Areas
A. County Fulton
B. Year 1970
C. Allocation Order
(1)
Subareas
Atlanta
Fairburn
Hapeville
Rosswell
Union City
East Point
College Park
SUBAREA TOTAL
Residual
D. COUNTY TOTAL
(2)
Population
455,140
3,143
9,567
5,430
3,031
39,315
12,305
527,931
79,661
607,592
(3)
Allocation Proportion
.749
.005
.016
.009
.005
.065
.020
.869
.131
1.0
Residual is equal to the COUNTY TOTAL [row D, column [2]) minus the
sun of the population accounted for by all specified subcounty areas.
N
RP = TPOP - I POP.
where:
RP - Residual population not accounted for
by specified subareas
TPOP = COUNTY TOTAL (row D, column [2])
POP. = Population in each specified subcounty
area i.
47
-------
A. County Fulton
B. Year 1970
C. Allocation Order
Table 3.1-7
Residential Fuel Use Allocated
to Subeounty Areas
(1)
Subarea
Atlanta
Fairburn
Hapeville
Rosswell
Union City
East Point
College Park
SUBAREA TOTAL
Residual
D. ACTUAL" COUNTY TOTAL
E. COMPUTED COUNTY TOTAL1
Annual Fuel Use
Coal
(tons/yr )
(2)
JU
'5
e
«t
(3)
«n
I
"I
CD
9213
62
197
111
62
800
246
L0689
1611
2300
-
(4)
Si
.2*
-Oil
(103 gal/yr )
CS)
•>
S
Tn
0
2800
19
60
34
19
243
75
3248
490
3738
-
(6)
*e
3
;o
'
-------
Table 3.1-8
Residential Fuel Combustion Emission Factors
A. County
B. Year 197
C. Allocation orders 1
73
6
r-t
•H •
o
(1)
Anthracite
Bituminous
Lignite
Distillate
Residual
Natural Gas
Emission Factors
(2)
Part.
14.6 Ib/ton
10 lb/
10 eal
19 lb/
106 ft3
(3)
64.6 Ib/toi
30.24 lb/
10 cal
.6 lb/
106 ft3
CO
10 Ib/ton
5 lb/
10 gal
20 lb/
106 ft3
(5)
HC*
(6)
These pollutants have been excluded from this analysis because they are
to be treated on an AQCR basis.
49
-------
Table 3.1-9
Residential Fuel Combustion Emissions
Allocated to Subeounty Areas
A. County
B. Year
C. Allocation
Fulton
(1)
Subarea
Atlanta
Fairburn
Hapeville
Rosswell
Union City
East Point
College Park
SUBAREA TOTAL
Residual
D. COUNTY TOTAL
missions
(tons/yr)
C)
Part.
180.87
1.21
3.87
2.17
1.21
15.70
4.83
209.85
31.63
241.48
(3)
S0x
343.06
2.31
7.34
4.14
2.31
29.78
9.16
398.01
59.99
458.01
(4)
CO
157.92
1.06
3.38
1.90
'1.06
13.71
4.22
183.22
27.62
210.84
(5)
HC
(6)
N:°X
50
-------
Table 3.1-2
Dwelling-Unit-Based Allocation Proportions for Subcounty Areas
Fulton
A. County
B. Year '
C. Allocation Order
1970
(1)
Subarea
Atlanta
Fairburn
Hapeville
Rosswell
Union City
East Point
College Park
SUBAREA TOTAL
Residual i
COUNTY TOTAL
(2)
Number of
Dwelling Units
156,471
949
3,700
1,696
851
13,123
4,264
181,054
26,725
207,779
(3)
Allocation Proportion
.753
.005
.018
.008
.004
.063
.020
.871
.129
1.0
D.
Residual is equal to the COUNTY TOTAL (row D, column [2]) minus the
sum of the dwelling units accounted for by all specified subcounty
areas.
N
RDU = TDU - Z DU.
i=l *
uhere:
RDU
Residual dwelling units not accounted
for by specified subareas
TDU - COUNTY TOTAL (row D, column 2)
DU. - Dwelling units in each specified subcounty
.%, area i
51
-------
Table 3.1-7
Residential Fuel Use Allocated
to Sufacounty Areas
A, County Fulton
B. Year 1970
C. Allocation Orde
aer
(1)
Subarea
Atlanta
Fairburn
Hapeville
Rosswell
Union City
East Point
College Park
SUBAREA TOTAL
Residual
D. ACTUAL OXWTY TOTAL
E. COMPUTED COUNTY TOTAL1
Annual Fuel Use
Coal
(tons/yr )
(2)
m»
TE
Bituminous g
9262
62
221
98
49
775
246
L0713
1587
L2300
-
(4)
1
.Oil
(103 gal/yr )
(5)
5
2815
19
67
30
15
235
75
3256
482
3738
-
(6)
|
K
Natural Gas
(106 ft5/>T )
(7)
10.542
70
252
112
56
882
280
12,194
1,806
14,000
-
This row will be used only in cases where an Order 3 allocation procedure is being
followed.
52
-------
Table 3.1-8
Residential Fuel Combustion Emission Factors
A. County Fulton
B. Year 197
C. Allocation order
dD
•3
8
»H
•H
O
Anthracite
Bituminous
Lignite
Distillate
Residual
Natural Gas
Bnission Factors
(2)
Part.
LA. 6 Ib/ton
10 lb/
10 eal
19 lb=/ ,
10s ft3
(3)
SOx
64.6 Ib/toi
30.24 lb/
10 eal
.6 lb/
10* ft3
.'4)
CO
10 Ib/ton
5 lb/
10 ^al
20 lb/
106 ft3
(5)
HC*
.
(6)
XO *
A
'
*These pollutants have been excluded from this analysis because they are to
to be treated on an AQCR basis.
53
-------
Table 3.1-9
Residential Fuel Combustion Emissions
Allocated to Subeounty Areas
Fulton
A. County
B. Year 1970
C. Allocation Order
(1)
Subarea
Atlanta
Fair/burn
Hapeville
Ros swell
Union City
East Point
College Park
SUBAREA TOTAL
Residual
D. COUNTY TOTAL
missions
(tons/yr)
(2)
Part.
181.84
1.21
4.34
1.93
.96
15.21
4.83
210.33
31.15
241.48
(3)
S0x
344.89
2.31
8.23
3.65
1.83
28.85
9.16
398.92
59.09
458.01
(4)
CO
158.77
1.06
3.79
1.68
.84
13.28
4.22
183.64
27.20
210.84
(5)
HC
(6)
NK)x
54
-------
Table 3.1-2
Dwelling-Unit-Based Allocation Proportions for Subcounty Areas
A. County
B. Year
C. Allocation
Fulton
3
(1)
Subarea,
Atlanta
Fairburn
Hapeville
Ros swell
Union City
East Point
College Park
SUBAREA TOTAL
Residual 1
COUNTY TOTAL
(2)
Number of
Dwelling Units
156,471
949
3,700
1,696
851
13,123
4,264
181,054
26,725
207,779
(3)
Allocation Proportion
.753
.005
.018
.008
.004
.063
.020
.871
.129
1.0
D.
Residual is equal to the COUNTY TOTAL (row D, column [2]) minus the
sum of the dwelling units accounted for by all specified subcounty
areas.
N
RDU - TDU - I DU.
where:
RDU " Residual dwelling units not accounted
for by specified subareas
TDU - COUNTY TOTAL (row D, column 2)
DU. - Dwelling units in each specified subcounty
1 area i
55
-------
Table 3.1-3
Residential ItuilUlnu Size Distribution
A. County
B. Year
l-'ulton
1970
AJ location Order
11)
Subarea
Atlanta
Pairbum
Hapeville
Ros swell
Union City
liast Point
College Park
SUHAWiA TOTAL
Residual
o. cowry TOTAL
Dwelling Units l>y Ituilding Sue
(2)
1
|
3
Z
77,140
840
2,213
1,241
699
8,832
2,345
93,310
19,322
112,632
S
te.
O
1
.493
.885
.598
.732
.821
.673
.550
1.0
(3)
2-4
.1
a
Z
26,131
as
696
214
116
2,493
849
30,584
160
30,744
c
o
<3t
,167
,09G
,188
,126
136
190
199
169
006
1.0
(4)
5+
i
E
3
sc
53,200
24
791
241
36
1,798
1,070
57,160
7,243
64,403
Proportion
.340
.025
.214
.142
.043
.137
.251
.316
.271
1.0
(5)
|
z
Proportion
1.0
«>)
L.
X
1
z
Proportion
1.0
(7)
i
Proportion
1.0
lotal
IVil IIIIK
liints
(B)
156,471
949
3,700
1,696
851
13,123
4,264
181,054
26,725
207,779
biilding size categories are arbitrary. User nut specify intervals for rasnber of dwelling inits per building
based on considerations of data availability, level of detail desired and time required for confutation.
56
-------
Table J.l-4
A. County
B- »eir
C.
Fulton
1970
Unter
(SI
(1)
Subarea
Atlanta
Falitmra
Hapeville
SossveU
Onion City
East Point
College Park
SUBAREA TOTAL
Residual
I'- OCWTY TOTAL
i*»ts]]jn»; llniT< Hv HirJ i.
E
Z
14,865
96
374
171
86
1.326
554
17,472
2,699
20,171
o
at
.095
.101
.101
.101
.101
.101
.130
.097
.101
.097
(ither
,„
E
Z
c
o
at
Total
Dwelling
Him
156,471
949
3,700
1,696
851
13,123
4,264
181.054
26.725
207.779
-------
A. County
B. Year 1970
C. Allocation Ureter
Table 3.1-5
Residential Fuel Use Factors by Building Size
Fulton
(1)
Number of
Dwelling Units
per Building *
1
2-4
5+
Fuel Use Factors
Coal
(Ibs/degree -day)
Anthracite K>
v^
(3)
1
4->
•H
«
2.38
2.14
1.62
(4)
•H
6>
•H
J
Oil
(gals/degree-day;
(5)
o>
ti
rH
r-t
•H
4->
to
s
.157
.142
.107
Residual *<*
\— '
Natural Gas
(ft3/degree-day)
(7)
26.6
23.9
17.0
User must specify building size categories in accordance with those specified
in TaEIe~~3.1-3.
58
-------
A. County
B. Year
Table 3.1-6
Annual Residential Fuel Use by Building Size
Fulton
1970
C. Allocation Order 3
(1)
Number of
Dwelling Units
Per Building l
1
2-4
5+
Aiiiiuai ruej. use
Coal
(tons/yr)
Anthracite 2
Bituminous Q
v— »
3.55
3.19
2.42
(4)
0)
•M
1
•H
J
Oil
(103 gal/yr)
Distillate 3
.468
.424
.319
(6)
fH
1
•H
(A
Natural Gas
(10& ft3/yr)
(7)
.079
.071
.051
User must specify building size categories in accordance with those specified
in TaEIe~3.1-3.
NOTE: Annual degree days for Atlanta = 2983.
59
-------
Table 3.1-7
Residential Fuel Use Allocated
to Subeounty Areas
A. County Fulton
B. Year 1Q7n
C. Allocation Order
(1)
Subarea
Atlanta
Fairburn
Hapeville
Rosswell
Union City
East Point
College Park
SUBAREA TOTAL
Residual
D. ACTUAL COUNTY TOTAL
E. COMPUTED COUNTY TOTAL1
Annual Fuel Use
Coal
(tons/yr )
(2)
•>
1
'c
Bituminous S
2915
79
288
136
70
1048
-0-
4536
2079
12300
6615
(4)
&
.5"
-Oil
(103 gal/yr )
(5)
•>
S
Tn
5
642
45
93
44
23
340
-0-
1187
673
3738
1860
(6)
"o
'55
£
Natural Gas
(106 ft3/>-r )
(7)
9,479
60
216
102
53
789
261
10,960
1,556
14,000
12,516
Correction factor*
1.86
2.01
1.12
This row will be used only in cases where an Order 3 allocation procedure is being
followed.
*These values are the result of row D divided by row E.
60
-------
Table 3.1-7
Residential Fuel Use Allocated
to Subeounty Areas
A. County Fulton
B. Year iq?f
C. Allocation
ADJUSTED
(1)
Subarea
Atlanta
Falrburn
Hapeville
Rosswell
Union City
East Point
College Park
SUBAREA TOTAL
Residual
D. ACTUAL COUNTY TOTAL
E. COMPUTED COUNTY TOTAL1
Annual Fuel Use
Coal
(tons/yr )
(2)
•>
"5
j
"c
Bituminous S
5420
147
536
253
130
1948
-0-
8434
3866
12300
12300
W
Si
0>
"It
-Oil
(103 gal/yr )
(5)
o>
g
Tn
0
1290
90
187
88
46
683
^-0-
2384
1353
3738
3737
(6)
*o
•a
'in
&
Natural Gas
(106 ft3/yr )
(7)
10.603
67
242
114
59
883
292
12,260
1,740
14,000
14,000
This row will be used only in cases where an Order 3 allocation procedure is being
followed.
61
-------
Table 3.1-8
Residential Fuel Combustion Emission Factors
A. County Fulton
B. Year 197
C. Allocation order
•*)
CO
10 Ib/ton
5 lb/
10 gal
20 lb/ 3
106 ft3
(5)
HC*
(6)
NO/
*These pollutants have been exluded from this analysis because they are
to be treated on an AQCR basis.
62
-------
Table 3.1-9
Residential Fuel Combustion Emissions
Allocated to Subeounty Areas
Fulton
A. County
B. Year '
C. Allocation Order
1970
U)
Subarea
t
Atlanta
Fairburn
Hapeville
Ros swell
Union City
East Point
College Park
•
SUBAREA TOTAL
Residual
D. COUNTY TOTAL
Emissions
(tons/yr)
(2)
Part.
146.74
2.16
7.15
3.37
1.74
26.02
2.77
189.96
51.52
241.48
(3)
^x
197.75
6.13
20.21
9.54
4.91
73.51
.09
312.16
145.85
457.99
(4)
CO
136.36
1.63
5.57
2.62
1.36
20.28
2.92
170.73
40.11
210.84
(5)
HC
(6)
•N1°x
63
-------
Table 3.1-2
Allocation Proportions for Subcounty .Areas
A, County Fulton
B. Year ' "
C, .Allocation Or
1975
rVrfcr
CO
Subarea
Atlanta
Fairbum
Hapevllle
Rosswell
Union City
East Point
College Park
SUBAREA TOTAL
Residual *
COUNTY TOTAL
(2)
Number of
Dwelling Units
163,199
1,287
3,940
2,500
1,276
15,288
5,761
193,252
40,084
233,336
(3)
Allocation Proportion
.699
.006
.017
.011
.005
.066
.025
.828
.172
1.0
D.
Residual is equal to the COUNTY TOTAL (row D, column [2]) minus the
sum of the dwelling units accounted for by all specified subcounty
areas.
N
RDU = TDU -
DU-
•where:
RDU " Residual dwelling units not accounted
for by specified subareas
TDU « COtHTY TOTAL (row D, column 2)
BJ « Dwelling units in each specified subcounty
area i
64
-------
Table 3.1-9
Residential Fuel Combustion Emissions
Allocated to Sufaeounty Areas
Fulton
A. County
B. Year _
C. Allocation Order"
1975
(1)
Subarea
Atlanta
Fairbunn
Hapeville
Rosswell
Union City
East Point
College Park
SUBAREA TOTAL
Residual
D. COUNTY TOTAL
missions
(tons/yr)
(2)
Part.
153.05
2.93
7.61
4.97
2.61
30.31
3.74
205.22
78.31
283.53
(3)
SO
X
206.25
8.31
21.52
14.06
7.36
85.64
.12
343.26
221.69
564.95
(4)
CO
142.22
2.21
5.93
3.86
2.04
23.63
3.94
183.83
• 60.97
244.80
(5)
HC
(61
XO
X
65
-------
Table 3.1-2
Dwelling-Unit-Based Allocation Proportions for Subcounty Areas
Fulton
A. County ^_
B. Year 1980"
C. Allocation Order
(1)
Subarea
Atlanta
Fairburn
Hapevllle
Ros swell
Union City
East Point
College Park
SUBAREA TOTAL
Residual 1
COUNTY TOTAL
(2)
Number of
Dwelling Units
169,890
1,625
4,180
3,305
1,701
17,459
7,259
205,419,
53,351
258,770
(3)
Allocation Proportion
.657
.006
.016
.013
.007
.067
.028
.794
.206
1.0
D.
Residual is equal to the COUNTY TOTAL (row D, column [2]) minus the
sum of the dwelling units accounted for by all specified subcounty
areas.
RDU = TDU - I DU.
J_1 1
vhere:
RDU " Residual dwelling units not accounted
for by specified subareas
TDU • COUNTY TOTAL (row D, column 2)
DU. - Dwelling units in each specified subcounty
i area i
66
-------
Table 3.1-9
Residential Fuel Combustion Emissions
Allocated to Subeounty Areas
A. County
B. Year
C. Allocation
Fulton
980
(1)
Subarea
Atlanta
Falrburn
Hapeville
Rosswell
Union City
East Point
College Park
S'UBAREA TOTAL
Residual
D. COU>nY TOTAL
missions
(tons/yr)
(2)
Part.
159.33
3.70
8.07
6.57
3.48
34.61
4.71
220.47
96.24
316.71
(3)
^x
214.71
10.50
22.83
18.59
9.81
97.80
.15
374.39
272.45
646.84
(4)
CO
148.05
2.79
6.29
5.10
2.72
26.99
4.96
196.90
74.93
271.83
(5)
HC
(6)
NX)x
67
-------
Table 3.1-2
IX%elling-liiit-Based Allocation Proportions for Subcounty Areas
Fulton
A. County
B. Year '
C. Allocation OTCST
1985
CD
Subarea
Atlanta
Fairburn
Hapeville
Ros swell
Union1 City
East Point
*
College Park
SUBAREA TOTAL
Residual *
COUNTY TOTAL
(2)
Number of
Dwelling Units
181,612
2,283
4,364
4,402
2,245
19,048
8,116
222,070
77,586
r
299,656
(3)
Allocation Proportion
.606
.008
.015
.015
.007
.064
*• •""•••" J027
.741
.259
1.0
D.
Residual is equal to the COUNTY TOTAL (row D, column [2]) minus the
sum of the dwelling units accounted for by all specified subcounty
areas.
RDU = TDU - I EU.
where:
RDU " Residual dwelling units not accounted
for by specified subareas
TDU - COUNIY TOTAL (row D, column 2)
DU. • Dwelling units in each specified subcounty
area i
68
-------
Table 3.1-9
Residential Fuel Combustion Emissions
Allocated to Subeounty Areas
Fulton
A. County
B. Year '
C. Allocation Order
1985
(1)
Sub area
Atlanta
Fairburn
Hapeville
Ros swell
Union City
East Point
College Park
SUBAREA TOTAL
Residual
D. COUNTY TOTAL
Emissions
(tons/yr)
Part.
170.32
5.20
8.43
8.75
4.59
37.76
5.27
240.32
141.38
381.70
(3)
229.52
14.75
23.83
24.76
12.95
106.70
.17
412.68
400.23
812.91
(4)
CO
158.27
3.92
6.57
6.79
3.59
29.45
5.55
214.14
110.07
324.21
(5)
HC
(6)
69
-------
B. 2. 2 Transportation Emissions
Transportation
Allocation Procedure
ALL ORDERS
Isolate limited access highways
ORDER 1
ETlocate VMT by population distribution
ORDER 2
Determine subarea VMT using planning study
ORDER 3
Determine subarea VMT by simulation model
Locate other transportation sources
70
-------
Sequence of Tables
Allocation
Procedure
All
Orders
3.2-1
.z-z
3.2-3
Order 1
Order 2
Order 3
3.2-7
3.2-8
3.2-9
3.2-10
3.2-11
Figure 3.2-1 Transportation Allocation Table Sequence
-------
ASSUMPTIONS AND LIMITATIONS OF THE EXAMPLE
FOR TRANSPORTATION AND EMISSIONS
A. Order 1 computations were performed because the data available for analy-
sis necessitated this.
B. Only motor vehicle emissions were computed since the data for other trans-
portation modes could not be obtained within the time constraints of the
project. It is not expected that the states would experience this diffi-
culty, because the county-wide computations would be completed and the
necessary data already collected.
C. Future year results (1975, 1980, 1985) are not representative of the actual
situation in Fulton County, Georgia, because the forecasting methods
employed were not adjusted for the proposed transit system or any addi-
tional highway or arterial street links.
D. Forecasts of VMT (Vehicle Miles of Travel) were computed in the following
manner:
1) Total county population for 1970, 1980, 1990 were obtained from
the Atlanta Regional Commission.
2) Five year growth rates were calculated by interpolating the
decade data, such that the percentage growth for the first five
years equaled the percentage growth for the second five years.
3) Using 1970 VMT for each limited access highway link, classified
by vehicle type, to start each succeeding year's VMT was obtained
by multiplying VMT from the previous year by the factor, 1 + popu-
lation growth rate. The rate of increase in annual miles driven
for all vehicle types were thereby assumed to equal the rate of
county population growth.
4) The YMT on every highway link was assumed to grow at the same
rate.
5) Non-limited-access-highway VMT also grew at the same rate as
population. The increases were distributed the same as popu-
lation increases in the various towns and rural areas.
6) The above procedure was done only as a substitute for the
projections prepared by the state highway department, but
unavailable to us in time to prepare the example. It is not
recommended that forecasts be obtained using the above pro-
cedure, since the effects of all known changes, such as
Atlanta's proposed new transit system, should be accounted
for in any forecast.
E. Because national average vehicle age distributions were not available for
the forecast years considered, the 1970 age distribution was weighted by
annual miles driven and applied to each forecast year. Although it would
72
-------
be reasonable to assume that the proportion of older cars will increase in
the future (i.e., the distribution of vehicles will age), such modified
projections could not be obtained. Using the 1970 age distribution correc-
ted for annual miles driven, it was reasoned that this approach provided a
better solution to data deficiencies than assuming a constant rate of auto-
mobile replacement.
F, The motor vehicle emissions estimates are probably conservative (e.g., high)
and this is considered appropriate for Order 1 computations.
G. The speed factors for limited access highways were determined using AP-42
and the average speed for each link was assumed to be 45 MPH. This conser-
vative estimate was applied because assuming a higher average speed would
yield lower speed correction factors and, therefore, lower emissions esti-
mates. The speed correction factor of 0.5 was used to estimate CO.
H. On Table 3.2-2, Columns (l)-(3) are the same for all years.
Columns (4)-(6) are not applicable for forecast years.
Column (10) is always 45 MPH.
73
-------
Table 3:2-1
Motor Vehicle Emission Factors
A. County Fulton
B. Year
1970
C. Allocation Order
(1)
Vehicle
Class
LDG
HDG
HDD
Emission Factors
(grams/vehicle-mile)
P&.
.34
.65
1.2
t5^
X
.13
.26
2.4
f4)
CO
75.2
138.1
20.4
ii it
(5)
HC *
(exhaust)
(6)
HC*
(evap.)
(7)
*°x*
*These pollutants have been excluded from this analysis because they
are to be treated on an AQCR basis.
74
-------
en
Table 3.2-2 a
Limited Access Highway Data
A. County Fulton
B. Year 1970
C. Allocation Order
If actual data are not available use design speed
* Coordinates estimated.
for highway segment in question.
Identification
Number
(1)
1
2
3
4
5
*6
*7
*8
*9
*10
*11
*12
*13
*14
*1S
Highway Segment
(2)
Begin
x 6 y
741.6
741.6
741.3
741.2
741.1
741.1
741.9
741.1
741.1
741.1
741.1
741.1
741.1
741.1
741.1
3726
3727
3729
3731
3732
3336
3737
3739
3739
3740
3741
3741
3741
3742
3743
(3)
End
x y
741.6
741.3
741.2
741.1
741; 6
741.9
741.1
741.1
741.1
741.1
741.1
741.1
741.1
741.1
741.1
3727
3729
3731
3732
3736
3737
3739
3739
3740
3741
3741
3741
3742
3743
3743
D. CCWIY TOTAL
Length
(mi)
(4)
0.32
1.98
0.52
0.70
1.80
1.10
0.60
0.40
0.20
0.45
0.40
0.25
0.20
0.18
0.50
Annual Volume
(106vehicles/yr)
(5)
LUG
14.64
18.30
21.90
26.59
36.19
40.42
42.20
36.80
47.36
45.38
37.36
35.90
39.17
44.13
42.91
(6)
HDG
1.093
1.366
1.635
1.985
2.701
3.017
3.150
2.747
3.535
3.387
2.789
2.680
2.924
3.294
3.203
(7)
HDD
.338
.422
.505
.613
.834
.932
.973
.848
1.092
1.046
.861
.828
.903
1.017
.989
VMT
(10 6 vehicle-iniles/yr)
(8)
IDG
4.69
36.23
11.39
18.61
65.15
44.46
25.32
14.72
9.47
20.42
14.94
8.98
7.83
7.94
21.46
(9)
HDG
.350
2.704
.850
1.389
4.863
3.319
1.890
1.099
.707
1.524
1.116
.670
5.848
.593
1.602
(10)
HIT)
.108
.835
.263
.429
1.502
1.025
.584
.339
.218
.471
.345
.207
.181
.183
.495
Speed1
(mph)
(11)
45
45
45
45
45
45
45
45
45
45
45
45
45
45
45
NDTE: Information for 1970 has been typed in this
is presented in computer printout format in
Table as a procedural example. Information for 1975, 1980, and 1985
Tables 3.2-2b, 3.2-2c, and 3.2-2d, respectively.
-------
Table 3.2-2 a (Continued)
Access Highway Data
A. County Fulton
B. Year 1970
C. Allocation Order
Identification
Nunber
(1)
*16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
Hi^iway Segment
(2)
Begin
x ° y
741.1
741.1
741.2
741.2
740.3
739.6
736.8
737.2
736.8
736.2
734.6
733.1
732.1
731.1
730.6
3743
3744
3744
3745
3747
3747
3750
3752
3755
3756
3721
3721
3721
3725
3727
(3)
End
x y
741.1
741.2
741.2
740.3
739.6
736.8
in. 2
736.8
736.2
734.1
733.1
732.1
731.1
730.6
730.1
3744
3744
3745
3747
3747
3750
3752
3755
3756
3758
3721
3721
3725
3727
3731
D. COUNTY TOTAL
Length
(mi)
(4)
0.71
0.36
0.70
1.03
0.36
2.02
1.20
1.10
1.00
1.15
0.70
0.80
1.26
1.38
2.38
Annual Volume
(106 vehicles/yr)
(5)
LDG
45.17
37.08
40.99
24.89
25.86
21.94
21.55
24.47
18.90
19.07
22.06
18.90
10.59
10.46
10.14
(6)
HDG
3.371
2.768
3.059
1.797
1.930
1.638
1.609
1.826
1.410
1.424
1.647
1.411
.791
.936
.672
(7)
Hnn
1.041
.855
.945
.545
.596
.506
.497
.564
.436
.440
.509
.436
.244
.304
.209
VHT
(10 6 vehicle-miles/yr)
(8)
LDG
30.07
13.35
28.69
25.64
9.31
44.32
25.86
26.92
18.90
21.93
15.44
15.12
13.34
14.43
24.13
(9)
Hnn
2.393
.997
2.141
1.851
.695
3.309
1.931
2.009
1.410
1.638
1.153
1.129
.996
1.292
1.600
(10)
HTD
.739
.308
.661
.561
.215
1.022
.596
.620
.436
.506
.356
-.349
.308
.420
.498
Speed1
(nph)
(11)
45
45
45
45
45
45
45
45
45
45
45
45
45
45
45
I
If actual data are not available use design speed for highway segment in question.
Coordinates estimated.
-------
Table 3.2-2a (Continued)
Limited Access Highway Data
A. County Pulton
B. Year 1970
C. Allocation Order
Identification
Number
(1)
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
Highway Segment
(2)
Begin
x y
730.1
729.9
730.7
731.2
731.9
731.2
736.2
737.9
743.6
743.5
744.8
744.2
747.0
744.9
736.5
3731
3736
3739
3741
3744
3747
3759
3761
3762
3761
3761
3761
3728
3726
3725
(3)
End
x y
729.9
730.7
731.2
731.9
731.2
730.4
737.9
743.6
743.5
744.8
744.2
747.6
744.9
744.1
737.6
3736
3739
3741
3744
3747
3747
3761
3762
3761
3761
3761
3761
3726
3725
3727
D. COUNTY TOTAL
Length
(mi)
(4)
2.40
2.21
0.80
1.58
1.05
0.75
0.70
1.70
1.61
1.24
0.41
0.20
1.30
0.30
0.98
Annual Volume
(106vehicles/yr)
(5)
LOG
9.69
14.35
16.66
13.46
16.21
10.85
21,90
19.69
23.60
30.10
18.34
22.16
13.68
14.64
17.62
(6)
HDG
.736
1.036
1.244
1.004
1.210
.810
1.634
1.445
1.762
2.247
1.370
1.654
1.021
1.093
1.315
(7)
Hnn
.235
.314
.384
.310
.374
.250
.505
.431
.544
.694
.423
5.108
.315
.338
.406
VMT
(10 6 vehicle-miles/yr)
C8)
LOG
23.26
31.71
13.33
21.27
17,02
8.14
15.33
33.47
38.00
37.32
7.52
4.43
17.78
4.39
17.26
(9)
HDfi
1.765
2.289
.995
1.586
1.271
.607
1.144
2.457
2.837
2.786
.562
.678
1.327
.328
1.289
Cio)
HHD
.563
.694
,307
.490
.392
.188
.353
.733
.876
.860
.173
2.094
.410
.101
.398
Speed1
(m>h)
(11)
45
45
45
45
45
45
45
45
45
45
45
45
45
45
45
If actual data are not available use design speed for highway segment in question.
-------
Table 3.2-2 a (Continued)
Limited Access Highway Data
A. County Fulton
B. Year 1970
C. Allocation Order
Identification
Number
(1)
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
S3
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
D. COIKIY TOTAL
Highway Segment
(2)
xBegi*y
737.6
738.4
739.1
740
740
741.9
742.6
745
745.6
725.9
727.3
731.2
733.5
436.1
737.5
3727
3728
3729
3730
3729
3746
3746
3748
3748
3742
3741
3741
3740
3739
3738
(3)
End
x y
738.4
739.1
740
740.1
741.1
742.6
745
745.6
747
727.3
731.2
733.5
736.1
737.5
739
3728
3729
3730
3729
3729
3746
3748
3748
3749
3741
3741
3740
3739
3738
3738
Length
(mi)
(4)
0.32
0.54
1.25
0.30
0.60
0.25
1.60
0.21
1.20
0.70
1.88
1.60
1.75
0.88
0.79
Annual Volume
(106 vehicles/yr)
(5)
I IX?
13.00
15.28
16.92
15.03
17.34
28.90
33.58
30.09
26.78
14.20
19.06
21.73
25.34
24.83
29.04
(6)
HDG
.970
1.140
1.263
1.122
1.294
2.157
2.506
2.246
1.999
1.060
1.423
1.478
1.689
1.854
2.168
(7)
HDD
.300
.352
.390
.347
.400
.666
.774
.694
.617
.327
.439
.456
.584
.573
'.670
VMT
(10 6 vehicle-miles/yr)
(8)
LDG
4.16
8.25
21.15
4.51
10.40
7.23
53.73
6.32
32.14
9.94
35.83
34.77
44.34
21.85
22.94
(9)
HDT
.311
.616
1.579
337
.776
.539
4.010
.472
2.399
.742
2.675
2.365
2.956
1.632
1.713
(10)
HT1D
.096
.190
.488
.104
.240
.167
1.239
.146
.741
.229
.826
.730
1.022
.504
.529
Speed1
(mph)
(11)
45
45
45
45
45
45
45
45
45
45
45
45
45
45
45
00
If actual data are not available use design speed for highway segment in question.
-------
Table 3.2-2 a (Continued)
Limited Access Highway Data
A. County Pulton
B. Year 1970
C. Allocation Order
Identification
Number
(1)
*61
62
63 ..„
64
65
66
67
68
*69
70
71
Highway Segment
(2)
Begin
x 6 y
739
739.9
740.8
741.5
741.1
743.2
744.8
743.2
738.5
738.4
744.8
3738
3738
3738
3738
3739
3739
3739
3741
3727
3728
3761
(3)
End
x y
739.9
740.8
741.5
741.1
743.2
744.8
747
744.1
739
738.5
744.8
3738
3738
3738
3739 i
3739
3739
3739
3741
3726
3727
3763
D. COUNTY TOTAL
Length
(mi)
(4)
0.20
0.67
0.34
0.44
0.65
0.64
1.11
0,40
0.23
0.15
1.25
Annual Volume
(10 6 vehicles/yr)
(S)
LDG
22.17
28.40
28.70
28.52
29.63
29.96
35.20
9.56
9.73
6.57
5.97
(6)
HDG
1.655
2 120
2.142
2.128
2.212
2.236
2.627
.713
.726
.491
.445
(7)
nnn
.511
.655
,662
.657
.683
.691
.811
.220
.224
.152
.138
VMT
(10 6 vehicle-miles/yr)
(8)
LDG
4.43
12.75
9.76
12.55
19.26
19.17
39.07
3.82
2.24
.99
7.46
(9)
HDG
.331
1.420
.728
.936
1.438
1.431
2.916
2.853
.167
.074
.557
(10)
HTffi
.102
.439
.225
.289
.444
.442
.900
.088
.052
.023
.172
Speed1
(nph)
(11)
45
45
45
45
45
45
45
45
45
45
45
<£>
If actual data are not available use design speed for highway segment in question.
^Coordinates estimated.
-------
Table 3.2-3a*
Limited Access Highway Emissions
A. County F,,1ton
B. Year 1970
C. Allocation Order 1
Highway Segment
Sequence
Identification
(1)
D. OOKIY TOTAL
Bnissions
(106 tons/yr)
Part.
(2)
LOG
(3)
HDG
(4)
HDD
^x
(S)
LOG
(6)
HDG
(7)
HO)
Speed
Correction
Factor
c8?
GO
(9)
LDG
(10)
HDG
(11)
HDD
Speed
Correction
Factor
(12)
HC (exhaust)
(13)
LDG
(14)
HDG
(15)
HDD
HC(evap.)
(16)
Speed
Correction
F&tenr
>)
"x
(18)
LDG
(19)
HDG
(20)
HDD
•CO
o
•Statistical information for this table is presented in the following computer
printout tabulation with corresponding table no.
-------
1970 EMISSIONS IN TON5/VR
Part.
LDG
(2)
1.757
13.507
4.271
6.979
£4.433
15.673
9.496
5.520
3.55Z
7.658
5.603
3.366
2.938
2.979
5.045
12,027
5.007
10. 759
9.616
3.431
16.621
9,598
10.096
7.088
8.224
5. 790
5.670
0.
1.
0.
0.
3.
2.
1.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
4.
0.
1.
1 .
0.
1 .
1.
e.
2.
1.
1.
1.
1 .
0.
0.
HDG
(3)
251
939
610
996
487
380
355
788
507
000 .
S00
000
133
000
149
716
714
535
327
436
372
3S4
440
011
174
827
803
HDD
(4)
0.143
1.105
0,348
0.568
1.988
1.357
0.772
0.443
0.289
0.623
0.456
0.274
0.239
0.242
0.655
0.978
0.407
0.575
0.742
2.234
1.353
0,739
0.821
0.577
0.669
0.471
0.461
Table 3.2-3a
SQx
LDG
(S)
0.672
5.195
1.633
2.668
9.34£
6.375
3.631
2.111
1.358
2.928
2.142
1.287
1.123
1.133
3.077
4.599
1.914
4.114
3.677
1.335
5.355
3.70S
3.860
2.710
3.1
-------
1970 Emissions in Tons/Yr
Table 3.2-3a (Continued)
LOG
(2)
5. ££3
£.4i£
3. £43
5.7£3
il.53£
4.353
7.377
c . 353
3.£5£
5.743
12.552
It. £51
± I . 53c
£.5££
1.66£
6 . 665
1.647
6.475
1.56to
3. £34
7.33£
i.691
3.3££
2.71£
££.150
£ > 5 ^^
i£ .£53
3.7£5
13.437
13.039
Part.
HDG
(3)
£.71-*
£.3£6
1.147
1.265
1.641
(2.714
1.137
£.311
£.435
£.5££
1.762
£.£34
i .337
0.403
0.436
£.351
£.£35
£.5£4
£.££3
£.44i
I.i3£
0.241
£.557
£.357
£.575
£. 335
i.7££
£. 5 32
i.Sl5
1.696
HDD
(4)
£.£5b"
£.£££
£.745
£. 515
£.4£7
0.C45
£.513
£.£45
£ . 465
£.570
1.153
1.135
£.££3
£.772
£.543
£.134
£.527
£.i£7
J.£5£
*.645
£.133
£.317
£.£££
1.640
£.133
£.351
*.3£3
1.093
£.566
LOG
(5)
1.313
2. .£65
3.460
3.335
4.547
1.911
3. £50
£.44£
1.167
2.135
4.793
5.443
5.351
1 . £75
0.636
2.543
£.63£
2-475
£.537
1.153
3. (533
0.647
1.491
1.036
7.704
£.306
4.6<39
1.425
5.138
4.966
SOx
HDG
(6)
£ . £'5b
0.371
£.453
£.5££
0.656
£.£55
0.455
£. 3b4
0.174
£ . 325
0.7(55
£.£14
0.799
0.161
0.194
£. 331
0.£34
0.370
£.££5
£.177
£.453
£.057
£.223
£.155
1.150
0.135
(2.6c£
0.213
0.767
0.678
HDD
(7)
£.515
1.111
1.3a3
1.490
1.336
£.513
1.297
1.038
0.456
£.536
1.34£
2.319
2.277
£.459
5.543
1.085
£.265
l.(554
£.254
0.503
1.231
£.275
0.635
0.441
3.230
£ . 336
1.561
0.606
2.187
1.933
LOG
(9)
553.247
555.453
1£<3<3.735
964.657
1315.102
552.532
552.126
705.567
337. 5£d
635. 77£
13££.£55
1575.966
1547.765
311.634
IS 3. ££7
737. 3£6
1££.143
715.3£i
!?£.££?
342.192
£77.150
157. ££i
431.317
299.641
2223.334
262.067
1332.936
412.240
1485.970
1442.005
CO
HDG
(10)
75.555
3£.4bi
I ^* ™ ^O
A t» *> • w *jiy
134.426
174.335
75.737
120.753
36.5££
46. £46
37.125
187.130
216.072
212.165
42. 760
51.646
101. £6 7
£4.974
55.173
23.656
46.385
120.260
25.636
55.13£
41.074
305. 4i£
35.926
182.713
56.512
203.734
160.123
HDD
(11)
4.753
5.607
6.332
7.5£5
3.457
5.5i4
4.414
5.1wS
3.576
3.247
9.556
3.675
1.950
23.559
4.612
I.i4i3
4.473
1.079
£.140
5.486
1.170
5.698
1.S73
13.933
1.639
3.334
2.575
9.293
8.515
82
-------
1970 Emissions in Tons/Yr
Table 3.2-3a (Continued)
LDG
(2)
16, 623
8.194
S.603
1.663
4.7S2
3.659
4.707
7.223
7.133
14.652
1.433
2. 539
v. 370
£.737
Part.
HDG
(3)
2.113
1.170
1.228
B. 237
. 1.018
0.522
0.671
1.031
1.026
2.031
2.045
fi.120
£.053
0.393
'-
HDD
(4)
1.353
0.667
0. 700
v, 135
0.551
0.293
0. 383
0.588
0.5S5
1.192
0.117
0 , 0d£
0,030
S . 223
LDG
(5)
6. 358
3. 133
3.289
0.636
-1.828
1.399
1.300
£.762
£.749
5.602
0.543
0.321
0.141
1.069
SQx
HDG
(6)
0.848
0.468
0.431
0.095
0.407
0.209
0.269
0.412
0.410
0.836
0.818
0.048
0.021
0.160
HDD
(7)
2.705
1.35-4
1.400
0.271
1.161
0.595
0.766
1.175
1.170
2.384
0.233
0.136
0.060
0.455
LDG
(93
1838. 904
906.181
951 . 386
183.890
528.778
404.692
520.434
798.766
795.034
1620.342
158.509
32.775
40.880
309.304
CO
HDG
(10)
225.135
124.237
130.466
25.210
108.150
55.469
71 . 311
103.521
108.588
222.089
217.231
12.719
5.606
42.392
HDD
(11)
11.438
5 , bo£
5.950
1.150
4.936
2.530
3.255
4.995
4.972
10.131
0.991
0.579
0.255
1.934
83
-------
Table 3.1-1
Pojxilation-Based Allocation Proportions for Subcounty Areas
A. County Fulton
B. Year 197 Q
C. Allocation
(1)
Subareas
Atlanta
Fairburn
Hapevllle
Ros swell
Union City
East Point
College Park
SUBAREA TOTAL
Residual
D. OXJNTY TOTAL
(2)
Population
455,140
3,143
9,567
5,430
3,031
39,315
12,305
527,931
79,661
607,592
(3)
Allocation Proportion
.749
.005
.016
.009
.005
.065
.020
.869
.131
1.0
Residual is equal to the COUNTY TOTAL (row D, column [2]) minus the
sum of the population accounted for by all specified subcounty areas.
RP TPOP
N
I POP.
where:
RP - Residual population not accounted for
by specified subareas
TPOP - COUVIY TOTAL (row D, colurai [2])
Population in each specified subcounty
area i.
POPi
84
-------
Table 3.2-4
Motor Vehicle Data Allocated to Subcounty Areas
A. County Fulton
B. Year 1970
C. Allocation Order
Subarea
(1)
Atlanta
Fairburn
HapeVille
Ro swell
Union City
East Point
College Park
SUBAREA TOTAL
Residual
D,_ COUNTY TOTAL
VNTT
(10 6 Vehicle -miles/yr)
(2)
LDG
1379.7
9.2
29.5
16.6
9.2
119.7
36.8
1600.7
241.3
1842.0
(3)
HDG
109.4
.7
2.4
1.3
.7
9.5
2.9
126.9
19.1
146
(4)
HDD
.166
.0011
.0035
.002
.0011
.014
.004
.193
.029
.222
Average
Speed
(mph)
(5)
85
-------
A. County Fulton
B. Year 1970
Table 3.2-S
Motor Vehicle Emissions Allocated
to Subcounty Areas
C. Allocation Order
Subarea
CD
Atlanta
Fairbum
Hapeville
Ros swell
Union City
East Point
College Park
SUBAREA TOTAL
Residual
D. COOTY TOTAL
(2)
LOG
469
3.1
10.03
5.6
3.1
40.7
12. S
544
82
626
Part.
(3)
HDG
7U1
.47
1.56
.845
.474
6.17
1.89
82.5
12.4
94.9
(4)
HID
.2
.001
.004
.002
.001
.017
.005
.230
.035
.265
SOx
CS)
IDG
179
1.43
3.84
2.16
1.2
15.6
4.78
208.1
31.4
239.4
(6)
HDG
28
.19
.62
.34
.19
2.S
.75
32.6
4.97
37.56
(7)
HDD
.4
.003
.008
.005
.003
.035
.011
.465
.070
.535
Speed
Correction
Factor
CO
(8)
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
Emissions
\.iv iuii!>/yrj ' mj
CO
(9)
LDG
104E3
612
2218
1248
692
9001
2767
120E3
18E3
138E3
(10)
HDG
15E3
101
331
179
101
L1312
400
18E3
2638
20E3
(11)
HDD
3.4
.023
.072
.041
.023
.294
.09
3.943
.593
4.536
Speed
Correction
Factor
HC
(12)
' grams/yr)
HC (exhaust)
(13)
LDG
(14)
HDG
(IS)
HDD
HC(evap.)
(16)
Speed
Correct ion
Factor
NOx
07)
^x
(18)
LDG
(19)
HDG
<20)
HDD
CO
0\
NOTE: All emissions values are in millions of grans. Therefore, 120E3 is read 120 billion grains.
-------
Table 3.2-11
Transportation Emissions
Allocated to Subeounty Areas
A. County
B. Year ~TC
C. Allocation Order I
(1)
Subarea
Atlanta
Fairburn
Hapeville
Rosswell
Union City
East Point
College Park
SUBAREA TOTAL
Residual
D. COUNTY TOTAL
missions
(tons/yr)
(2)
Part.
595.7
4.0
12.8
7.1
4.0
51.7
15.9
690.9
104.1
795.0
(3)
^
228.7
1.8
5.0
2.8
1.5
20.0
6.1
265.8
40.1
305.9
(4)
CO
131201.2
786.1
2810.4
1573.3
874.3
11370.4
3491.7
152107.4
22754.1
174861.5
(5)
HC
(6)
N0x
87
-------
Table 3 '.2-1
Itotor Vehicle Emission Factors
A.
B.
C.
County
Year
Fulton
1975
Allocation Order
1
(1)
Vehicle
Class
LDG
HDG
HDD
Emission Factors
(grams /vehicle -mi le)
(2)
Part.
.34
.65
1.2
Si
.13
.26
2.4
f4)
CO
43.9
134.6
20.4
(5)
HC*
(exhaust)
(6)
HC*
(evap.)
(7)
N0x*
*These pollutants have been excluded from this analysis because they
are to be treated on an AQCR basis.
-------
Format for
Table 3.2-2b*
Limited Access Highway Data
A. County Fulton
B. Year 1975
C. Allocation Order 1
Identification
Number
(1)
Highway Segment
(2)
Begin
x * y
(3)
End
x y
D. COUMY TOTAL
Length
(mi)
(4)
Annual Volume
(10 6 vehicles/yr)
(5)
LDG
(6)
HDG
(7)
HTiD
VMT
(10 6 vehicle-miles/yr)
(8)
LDG
(9)
WIG
(10)
tfflD
Speed1
(mph)
(11)
CO
to
If actual data are not available use design speed for highway segment in question.
*Statistical information for this table is presented in the following computer
printout tabulation with corresponding table no.
-------
Table 3.2-2b
V'MT BV VEHICLE TV'PE
VEAR: 1975
LDG
(7)
4.920
33. 64 1
11.953
19.540
68.407
46.683
26.586
15.456
9.946
21.441
15.687
9.424
8.226
8.340
22.533
33.673
14.017
30.124
26.922
9.775
46.536
27.153
28,266
19.845
23.026
16.212
15.876
14.007
HDG
(8)
0.367
£.839
0.893
1.458
5.106
3.485
1.984
1.154
0.742
0.000
1.172
0.000
6.140
0.000
1.682
2.513
1.046
2.248
1.944
0.730
3.474
2.028
2.109
1.480
1.720
1.211
1.185
1.046
HDD
(9)
0.113
0.877
£.276
0.450
1.577
1.076
0.613
0.356
0.229
0.494
0.362
0.217
0.130
0.132
0.519
0.776
0.323
0.694
0.583
0.225
1.073
0.626
0.651
0.457
0.531
0.374
0.366
0.323
90
-------
VMT by Vehicle Type
Year: 1975
LDG
(7)
15.151
25.336
24.423
33.295
13.996
-, .-. "s ^ ™%
££. J-3.J
17.371
8.545
16.096
35.143
39.900
n
39.186
7.895
4.654
13.669
4.612
18.123
4.368
3.664
22.207
4.734
10.920
7. 586
56.416
6.635
33.747
10.437
37.621
36.508
46.557
Table 3.2-2
HDG
(8)
1.357
1.680
1.S53
2.403
1.045
1.665
1.335
0.633
1.201
2.580
2.979
2.925
0.590
0.712
1.393
0.344
1.353
0.326
0.646
1.658
0.353
0.315
0.566
4.2lt)
0.495
2.519
b.779
2 . dt>5
2.483
3.104
HDD
(9)
0.441
0.523
0.551
0.72S
0.323
0.515
0.157
0.371
0.770
0.903
0.132
£. 155
£.430
0.106
0.101
8,200
0.512
0.252
0.175
l.Sli/1
0.153
0.77S
0.241
i5.S67
0.767
1.073
91
-------
Table 3.2-2b (Continued)
LOG HDG HDD
(7) (8) (9)
22.942 1.714 0.529
24.037 1.799 0.555
4.656 0.348 0.107
13.387 1.491 0.461
10.2*6 0,765 0.^36
13.177 0.983 0.304
20.223 1.510 0.466
20.128 1.503 0.464
41.023 3.062 0.946
4.013 2.996 0.093
2.349 0.175 0.054
1.035 0.077 0.024
7.831 0.534 0.180
92
-------
Table ?.2-3b*
Limited Access Highway laussions
A. County Fulton
B. Year 1975
C. Allocation Order 1
Highway Segnent
Sequence
Identification
d)
D. COWIY TOTAL
Emissions
(10s tons/yr)
Part.
r.)
LDG
(3)
HDG
(<)
HDD
"x
(5)
LOG
(6)
HDG
F.»
D
HDD
Speed
Correction
factor
f8?
00
(9)
LDG
00)
HDG
(11)
HDD
Speed
Correction
Factor
(12)
HC (exhaust)
(13)
LDG
(14)
HDG
(15)
HDD
HC(evap.)
(16)
Speed
Correction
fiffitor
ch)
»x
(18)
LDG
(19)
HDG
(20)
HDD
to
•Statistical information for this table is presented in the following caaputer
printout tabulation with corresponding table no.
-------
Table 3.2-3b
s EMISSIONS IN TONS
Part.
LDG
(2)
1.845
14.266
4.485
7.328
55.654
17.507
9.970
5.796
3.730
8.041
5.883
3.534
3.085
3.128
8.450
12.628
5.257
11.297
10.096
3.666
i?.*52
10.183
10.600
7.442
8.635
6.080
5.954
HDG
(3)
0.263
2.036
0.640
1.046
3.661
2.499
1.423
0.827
0.532
0.000
0.840
0.000
4.402
0.000
1.206
1.801
0.750
1,612
1.333
6.523
£.451
1.454
1.512
1.061
1.233
0.868
0.850
/VR
HDD
(4)
0,150
1.161
0.365
0.596
2.087
1.425
0.811
0.472
0.304
0.654
0.479
0.288
0.251
0.254
0.687
1,027
0.428
0.915
0.780
0 . £93
1.420
0.829
0.362
0.606
0.703
0.495
0.434
LOG
(5)
0.706
5.455
1.715
£.802
9.809
6.694
3.812
2.216
1.426
3.074
£.£49
1.351
1.179
1.196
3.231
4.828
2.010
4.320
3.860
1 . 402
6.673
3.893
4.053
2.846
3.302
2.325
£.276
(6)
0.105
0.814
0.£56
0.418
1.464
0.999
0.569
0.331
0.213
0.000
0.336
0.000
1.761
0.000
0.482
0,721
0,300
0.645
0.557
0.209
0.996
0.581
0.605
0.425
0.493
0.347
0.340
HDD
(7)
0.300
2.321
0.730
1.192
4.175
2.849
1.622
0.943
0.607
1.308
0.958
0.575
0.502
0.509
1.375
2.054
0.855
1.833
1.559
0.596
2.841
1.657
1.724
1.211
1.405
0.990
0.569
LUG
(9)
119.125
921.017
289.550
473,092
1656.204
1130.235
643.670
374.203
240.791
519.105
379.796
228.157
199.151
201.922
545.543
815.264
339.376
729. S4S
651 . 805
236.673
1126.676
657.397
684.344
480.464
557.491
392.506
384,371
CO
IDG
(10)
27.265
210.759
66.268
108.264
379.039
258.694
147.313
35.660
55.106
0.000
86.985
0,000
455.814
0.000
124.865
186.519
77,671
166.377
144.273
54.155
257.915
150.509
156.588
109.900
127.671
89.869
87.998
HDD
(11)
1.276
9.S65
3.102
5.068
17.743
12.108
6.894
4.00S
£.530
5.560
4.070
2.444
2.133
2.163
5.343
3.731
3.635
7.813
6.626
2.535
12.073
7.043
7.329
5.147
5.972
4.205
4.118
94
-------
1975' Emissions in Tons/Yr
LDG
(Z)
5.253
5.682
9.502
9.159
12.486
5.249
S.376
6.702
3.20S
6.037
13.180
14.963
14.696
2.961
1.745
7.001
1.729
6.796
1.638
3.249
8.328
1.776
4.095
2.845
21.157
2.488
12.656
3.914
14.109
13.691
Part.
HDG
(3)
0.750
0.973
1.204
1.329
1.723
0.749
1.194
0.957
0.457
0.861
1.850
2.136
2.097
0.423
0.510
0.999
0.247
0.970
0.234
0.463
1.189
0.253
0.584
0.406
3.019
0.355
1.806
0.559
2.014
1.780
HDD
(4)
0.428
0.583
0.693
0.782
0.964
0.427
0.631
0.545
0.261
0.491
1.019
1.217
1.196
0.241
2.910
0.570
0.141
0.553
0.133
0.264
0.678
0.145
0.333
0.231
1.722
0.202
1.030
0.318
1.148
1.015
LDG
(5)
2.008
2.173
3.633
3.502
4.774
2.007
3.202
2.563
1.225
2.308
5.039
5.721
5.619
1.132
0.667
2.677
0.661
2.599
0.626
1.242
3.184
0.679
1.566
1.088
8.090
0.951
4.839
1.497
5.395
5.235
SDx
HDG
(6)
0.300
0.389
0.4S2
0.531
0.639
0.300
0.478
0.383
0.183
0.344
0.740
0.854
0.839
0.169
0.204
0.400
0.099
0.388
0.094
0.185
0.475
0.101
0.234
0.162
1.207
0.142
0.722
0.223
0.805
0.712
.MVHy
HDD
(7)
0.855
1.167
1.385
1.564
1.926
0.854
1.362
1.090
0.521
0.982
2.037
2.435
2.391
0.482
5.820
1.139
0.282
1.106
0.267
0.529
1.355
0.£83
0.667
0.463
3.444
0.405
2.059
0.637
£.£96
£.030
LOG
(9)
339.121
366.831
613.413
591 . 302
Sub. 112
338. S67
540.713
432.672
206.879
389.710
850.854
966.013
948.726
131.143
112.668
451.992
111.651
438.773
105.753
209.752
537.662
114.625
264.382
183.670
1365.891
160.638
817.044
25£.689
310.848
883.902
CO
HDG
(10)
77.663
100.703
124.710
137.570
176.413
77.569
123.618
99.066
47.327
89.167
191.507
221.126
217.151
43.781
52.853
103.431
25.558
100.469
24.209
47.982
1£3.073
26.236
60.515
42.035
312.553
36.766
186.986
57.834
£08.499
184.336
HDD
(11)
3.635
4.353
5.88S
6.648
8.135
3.630
5.790
4.634
2.215
4.175
8 . 653
10,348
10.163
2.047
24.737
4 . 842
1.197
4.702
1.133
£.£47
5.760
1.229
2.833
1.967
14.636
1.721
3.751
£.706
9.758
8.626
95
-------
1975 Emissions in Tons/Yr
Table 3.2-3b (Continued)
LDG
(2)
17, 4ot>
3.604
9.033
1.746
5.021
3.842
4 . 342
7. 584
7.545
15.335
1.505
0.881
0.388
2.937
Part.
HDG
(3)
5.225
1.229
1.290
0.249
1.069
0.548
0.705
1.033
1.077
2.195
2.148
0.126
0.055
0.419
HDD
(4)
1.420
(5.700
0. 735
0.142
0.610
0.S1S
0.402
0.61?
0.614
1.251
0.122
0.072
0.032
0.239
LDG
(5)
6.676
3.290
3.454
0 . 663
1.920
1.469
1 , 390
2.900
2.886
5.882
0.575
0.337
0.148
1.123
SOx
HDG
(6)
0.890
(5.491
0.516
0.100
0.423
0.219
0.232
0.433
0.431
0.878
0.859
0.050
0.022
0.168
HDD
(7)
£.341
1.400
1.470
0.234
1.219
0.625
0.804
1.234
1.228
2.503
0.245
0.143
0.063
0.478
LDG
(9)
1127.135
555.457
533.167
112.713
324.123
£43 . 062
319.038
489.616
437.328
993.214
97.161
56.363
25.058
133.593
CO
HDG
(10)
230.401
127.204
133.517
25.752
110.63(5
56.766
72.978
112.083
111.537
227.233
222.373
13.017
5.757
43.383
HDD
(ID
12.073
5.351
6 . 24"
I.£i37
5.1S2
2.657
3.413
5.245
5.220
10.638
1.041
0.608
0.268
2.031
96
-------
Table 3.1-1
Population-Based Allocation Proportions for Subcounty Areas
Pulton
A. County
B. Year
C. Allocation Order
1975
(1)
Subareas
Atlanta
Fairburn
Hapeville
Ros swell
Union City
East Point
.College Park
SUBAREA TOTAL
Residual
D. COUNTY TOTAL
(2)
Population
441,486
4,620
9,758
8,905
6,062
43,640
17,473
531,944
106,028
637,972
(3)
Allocation Proportion
.692
.007
.015
.013
.008
.068
.027
.830
.17
1.0
Residual is equal to the COUNTY TOTAL (row D, column [2]) minus the
sum of the population accounted for by all specified subcounty areas.
N
RP - TPOP - I POP.
where:
RP - Residual population not accounted for
by specified subareas
TPOP = COUNTY TOTAL (row D, column [2])
POP. = Population in each specified subcounty
area i.
97
-------
Table 3.2-4
Motor Vehicle Data Allocated to Subcounty Areas
A. County
B. Year
Fulton
1975
C. Allocation Order
Sub area
CD
Atlanta
Fairburn
Hapeville
Roswell
Union City
East Point
College Park
SUBABEA TOTAL
Residual
D. COUNTY TOTAL
VMT
(10 6 Vehicle -miles/yr)
(2)
LDG
1274.6
12.8
27.6
23.9
14.7
125.2
49.7
1528.5
405.6
1934.1
(3)
HDG
101
1.022
2.1900
1.8980
1.1680
9.9280
3.9420
121.1
32.2
153.3
(4)
HDD '
.1536
.0016
.0033
.0029
.0018
.0151
.0060
.1843
.0488
.2331
Average
Speed
Guph.)
(5)
98
-------
A. County
B. Year
Fulton
Table 3.2-5
M>tor Vehicle Emissions Allocated
to Subcounty Areas
1975
C. Allocation Order
Subarea
CD
Atlanta
Fairbum
Hapeville
Rosswell
Union City
J§ East Point
College Park
SUBAREA TOTAL
Residual
D. COUNTY TOTAL
(2)
LOG
433
4.35
9.38
5.71
4.99
42.56
16.89
519.7
137.9
657.6
Part.
(3)
HDG
65
.6643
1.42
1.23
.7592
6.45
2.56
78.71
20.93
99.64
(4)
HDD
.1843
.0019
.0039
.0035
.0022
.0181
.0072
.2211
.0585
.2797
(5)
LOG
166
1.664
3.59
3.11
1.91
16.28
6.46
198.7
52.72
251.4
SOx
(6)
HDG
26
.2657
.5694
.4935
.3036
2.58
1.02
31.49
8.37
39.86
(7)
HDD
.3686
.0038
.0079
.0070
.0043
.0317
.0144
.4423
.1171
.5594
Speed
Correction
Factor
CO
(8)
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1,0
1.0
1.0
1.0
Emissions
CO
(9)
LOG
56E3
561.9
1211
1049
645
5496
2181
67E3
17E3
84E3
(10)
HDG
14E3
137.5
294
255
157
1336
530
16E3
4334
20E3
(11)
HDD
3.133
.032(
.0672
.0592
.0367
.308(
.1224
3.75
.9955
4.755
Speed
Correction
Factor
HC
(12)
6 grams/yr)
HC (exhaust)
(13)
LOG
(14)
HDG
(15)
HDD
HC(evap.)
(16)
Speed
Correct ion
Factor
NOv
07)
MX
(18)
LOG
(19)
HDG
#<9
HDD
NOTE: All emissions values are in millions of grams. Therefore, 120E3 is read 120 billion grans.
-------
A. County
B. Year 1975
Table 3.2-11
Transportation Emissions
Allocated to Subeounty Areas
C. Allocation Order 1
CD
Sub area
Atlanta
Fairburn
Hapeville
Rosswell
Uhion City
East Point
College Park
5'_3.:-7£A TOTAL
Residual
~j. C:UNTY TOTAL
emissions
(tons/yr)
(2)
Part.
549.3
5.5
11.9
7.6
6.3
54.0
21.5
660.0
175.2
835.2
(3)
*>*
212.1
2.1
4.6
4.0
2.4
20.8
8.3
254.2
67.5
321.7
(4)
CO
77178.4
771.1
1659.4
1437.8
884.2
7532.6
2989.0
91511.7
23521.8
115033.5
(5)
HC
(6)
MX
100
-------
Table 3:2-1
Motor Vehicle Emission Factors
A. County Fulton
B. Year
1980
C. Allocation Order
(1)
Vehicle
Class
LDG
HDG
HDD
Emission Factors
(grains /vehicle -mile)
P&.
.34
.65
1.2
^
.13
.26
2.4
(!)
CO
13
131.2
20.4
(5)
HC*
(exhaust)
--, .
(6)
HC*
(evap.)
(7)
NO*
•*These pollutants have been excluded from this analysis because they
are to be treated on an AQCR basis.
101
-------
Format for
Table 3.2-2c*
Limited Access Highway Data
A. County Fulton
B. Year 1980
C. Allocation Order 1
Identification
Number
(1)
Highway Segment
(2)
Begin
x 6 y
. _ _,. ,__^
(3)
End
x y
,_*}. ;
h-t
D. COINIY TOTAL
Length
(mi)
(4)
Annual Volume
(106 vehicles/yr)
(5)
LDG
(6)
HDG
(7)
unn
VMT
(10 6 vehicle-miles/yr)
(8)
LDG
(9)
HDG
(10)
HDD
Speed1
(nph)
(ID
If actual data are not available use design speed for highway segment in question.
*Statistical information for this table is presented in the following computer
printout tabulation with corresponding table no.
-------
Table 3.2-2c
VMT BV VEHICLE TVPE
VEAR; 1980
LOG
(7)
5.166
33.944
12.557
20.518
71.828
49.017
27.915
16.229
10.443
22.513"
16.471
9.895
8.637
8.757
23.660
35.357
14.718
31.631
28.268
10.264
48.863
28.511
29.679
20.837
24.178
17.023
16.670
14.707
HDG
(8)
0.386
2.981
0.937
1.531
5.361
3.659
2.084
1.£12
0.779
0.000
1.230
0.000
6.447
0,000
1.766
2.638
1.099
2.360
2.041
0.766
3.648
2.123
2.215
1.555
1.806
1.271
1.245
1.099
HDD
(9)
0.119
0,921
0.290
0.473
1.656
1.130
0.643
0.374
0.241
0.519
0.380
0.223
0.199
0.202
0.545
0.815
0.339
0.729
0.618
0.237
1.127
0.657
0.634
0.430
0.557
0.332
0.384
0.339
103
-------
VMT by Vehicle Type
Year: 1980
LOG
(7)
15.309
26.603
25.644
34.960
14.696
23-. 450
18.765
S.972
16.901
36.901
41.895
41.145
8.290
4.886
19.602
4.842
19.029
4.586
9.097
23.318
4.971
11.466
7.966
59.237
6.967
35.434
10.959
39.503
33.334
48.885
Table 3.2-2c (Continued)
HDG
(8)
1.424
1.764
1.946
2.524
1.097
1.749
1.401
0.669
1.261
£ . 709
3.128
3.072
0.619
0.748
1.463
0.362
1.421
0.342
0.679
1.741
0.371
0.856
0.595
4.421
0.520
2.645
0.818
2.949
2.607
3.259
HDD
(9)
0.463
0.549
0.620
0.765
0.339
0.540
0.433
0.207
w. 33fi
0 . 80S
0.96b
0.94£
0.191
2.309
0.452
0.112
0.439
0.106
0.210
i3.538
0.115
0.264
0.184
1.366
0.161
0.817
0.253
0.911
0.805
1.127
104
-------
VMT by Vehicle Type
Year: 1980
Table 3.2-2c (Continued)
LOG
(7)
24.090
£5.291
4 . SSS
14.057
10.758
13.836
21.234
21.135
43.075
4.214
2.466
1.087
8.222
HDG
(8)
1.799
1 . 889
0.365
1.566
0.803
1.032
1,585
1.578
3.215
3.145
0.164
0.081
0.614
HDD
(9)
0.555
0.583
0.113
0.484
0.248
0.319
0.490
0.487
0.993
0.097
0.057
0.025
0,190
105
-------
Table 1.2 5c*
Limited Access Highway Emissions
A. County Fulton
B. Year 1980
C. Allocation Order 1
Highway Segment
Sequence
Identification
(1)
D. COUNTY TOTAL
Emissions
(10 6 tons/yr)
(2)
LOG
Part.
(3)
HDC
(")
HDD
^X
(5)
LDG
(6)
HDG
(7)
HDD
Speed
Correction
Factor
(S?
CO
(9)
LDG
(10)
HDG
/
(ID
HDD
Speed
Correction
Factor
HL
(12)
HC(exhaust)
(13)
LDG
(14)
HDG
(15)
HDD
HC(evap.)
(16)
Speed
Correction
Factor
%
*>x
(18)
LDG
(19)
HDG
(20)
HDD
•Statistical information for this table is presented in the following computer
printout tabulation with corresponding table no.
-------
1980 EMISSIONS IN TONSA'R
Table 3.2-3c
LUG
(2)
1.937
14 . 980
4,709
7.691
26.937
18.382
10.169
6.0S6
3.316
8.413
6.177
3.711
3.239
3.284
8.873
13.260
5.520
11.862
10.601
3,849
18.325
IS. 692
11.130
7.814
9.067
6.3S4
6,252
Part.
HUG
(3)
0.276
2.137
0.672
1.098
3.844
2.623
1.494
0.869
0.559
0.000
0.882
0.000
4.622
0.000
1.266
1.892
0.788
1.692
1.463
0.549
2.616
1.526
1.588
1.115
1.295
0.911
0.892
HDD
(4)
0.158
1.219
0.383
0.626
2.192
1.496
0.852
0.495
0.319
0.687
0.503 .
0.302
0.264
0.267
0.722
1.079
0.449
0.965
0.819
0.313
1.491
0.870
0.905
0.636
0.738
0.519
0,509
LOG
(S)
0.741
5.728
1.801
2.942
10. 299
7.029
4.003
2.327
1.497
3.228
2.362
1.419
1.238
1.256
3.333
5.070
2.110
4.536
4.053
1.472
7.006
4.088
4.256
2.988
3.467
2.441
2.390
SQx
(6)
0.111
0.855
0.269
0.439
1.538
1.049
0.598
0.347
0.224
0.000
0.353
0.000
1.349
0.000
0.507
0.757
0.315
0.677
0.585
0.220
1.046-
0.611
0.635
0.446
0.518
0.365
0.357
HDD
(?)
0.315
2.437
0.766
1.252
4.384
2.992
1.703
0.990
0.637
1.374
1.005
0.604
0.527
0.534
1.444
2.157
0.898
1.930
1.637
0.626
2.983
1.740
1.811
1.272
1.475
1.039
1.017
LOG
(9)
37.040
286.375
90.031
147.100
514.970
351.428
200.139
116.352
74.870
161.407
118.091
70.942
61.923
62,784
169.628
253.493
105.523
226.776
202.668
73.590
350.322
204 . 407
212.786
149.393
173.343
122.044
119.514
00
HOG
(10)
27.905
215.707
67.823
110.805
387.938
264.768
150.772
87.671
56 . 400
0.000
8S.027
0.000
466,515
0.000
127.797
190.898
79.494
170.795
l47.6£i
55.4£7
263,S7i2
154.042
160.265
112,480
130.669
91.979
9i,064
HDD
(U)
1.340
10.358
3,257
5.321
18.G30
12.714
7.239
4.209
2.709
5.S3S
4.273
2.566
2.240
2.271
6.135
9.168
3.317
8,204
6.957
r, ,- * /-.
£.bO£
12.677
7.395
7.695
5.404
6.270
4.416
4,32^
107
-------
1980 Emissions in Tons/Yr
Table 3.2-3c (Continued)
LOG
S.Ik
5.566
5.977
5.617
13.111
5.511
8.794
7.037
3.365
6.338
13.333
15.711
15.430
3.109
1.832
7.351
1 . zl&
7. i jo
, . 720
3.411
8 . 745
1 . 864
4.300
2.357
£2.215
2.613
13.255
4.110
14.814
14.376
Part.
0.788
1.021
1.265
1.395
1.809
0.787
1.254
1.005
0.432
0.904
1.542
2.242
2.202
0.444
0.536
1.049
0.253
1.013
0.i4b
0.437
1.248
0.266
0.614
0.426
3.170
0.373
1 . S56
0.587
2.114
1.869
w
0.449
0.613
0.727
0.821
1.012
0.448
0.715
0.572
0.274
0.516
1.070
1.278
1.255
0.253
3.056
0.538
6.143
tJ.SSl
0.140
0.278
0.712
0.152
0.350
0.243
1.303
0.213
1.081
0.334
1.205
1.066
UXi
2^03
2.231
3.815
3.677
5.013
2.107
3.363
2.691
1.287
2.423
5.291
6.007
5.900
1.183
0.701
2.511
0.694
2.725
0.658
1.304
3.344
0.713
1.644
1.142
3.454
£.993
5.081
1.571
5.664
5.437
SObc
tUb
(6)
0.3T15
0.403
0,506
0.558
0.724
0.315
0.501
0.402
0. 152
0.362
0.777
0.897
0.381
0.173
0.214
0.420
0.104
0.408
0.098
0.135
0.499
0.106
0.245
0.171
1.263
0.149
0.759
0.235
0.846
0.743
MUJ
0.(838
1.225
1.455
1.643
2.025
0.897
1.430
1.145
0.547
1.031
2.139
2.557
2.511
0.506
6.111
1.156
0.296
1.162
0.280
0.555
1.423
0.304
£.700
0.4S6
3.616
0.425
2.162
0.669
2.411
2.131
$
105.444
114.060
190.733
183.856
250.648
105.365
165.126
134.532
64.326
121.174
264.559
300.366
294.991
59.433
35.032
140.540
34.716
136.429
32.3S2
65.219
167.175
35.641
32 . 205
57.1t/S
424.702
49.948
254.047
78.569
253.214
274.335
GO
ffi)
79.486
103.067
127.637
140.800
182.601
73.330
126.521
101 . 352
48.438
91.261
196.003
226.317
222.243
44 . 303
54.034
105.855
26.153
102.823
24.773
43.103
125.562
26.852
61.536
45.022
319.351
37.629
191 . 376
53.132
213.334
138,664
(ffl
3.817
5.207
6.182
6.381
3.605
3.812
6.075
4 . Sec
2.326
4.3S3
5.032
10.366
10.671
2.l5fi
£5.3/4
5.084
1.257
4.537
1.130
2.355
6.£4c
l.£5tf
£.5?4
2.065
15.363
1.307
5. 155
2.342
l£.24b
9. £57
108
-------
1980 Emissions in Tons/Yr
Table 3.2-3c (Continued)
Part. JiOx °°
LOG
(2)
18.333
3.034
3.485
1.533
5.272
4.035
5.189
7.963
7.926
16.154
1.580
0.925
0.403
3.084
HDG
(3)
2.337
1.290
1.354
0.262
1.122
0.576
0.740
1.137
1.131
2.305
2.255
0.132
0.058
0.440
HDD
(4)
1.491
0.735
0.772
0.149
0.640
0.328
0.422
0.648
0.645
1.314
0.129
0.075
0.033
0.251
LDG
7.010
3.454
3.627
0.701
2.016
t.543
1.984
3.045
3.031
6.176
0.604
0.354
0.156
1.179
HDG
0.935
0.516
0.542
0.105
0.449
0.230
0.296
0.455
a. 452
0.9£i
0.902
0.053
0.023
0.176
HUU
2.3S3
1.470
1.544
0.298
1.280
0.656
0.844
1.296
i.£3s5
2.628
0.257
0.150
0.066
u.502
mo
/'QI
350.430
172.711
181.326
35.048
100.781
77.131
93.200
152.238
151.52?
30S. 824
30. 2H
17.682
7.791
58.351
IIDG
(10)
235.810
130.130
136.652
26 . 40£
il3.27£
58 . £99
?4.£9£
ii4.?i4
114.156
232. 61S
227.593
13.325
5.871
44. *ȣ
1JUU
(11)
12.677
6.249
6. 56S
1.268
5 . 442
2.75^
5.555
5. Si?
5.48i
11.175
1.S33
*.639
».£££
• LA12
109
-------
Table 3.1-1
Popilation-Based Allocation Proportions for Subcounty Areas
A. County Fulton
B. Year 1980
C. Allocation Order
(i)
Subareas
Atlanta
Falrburn
Hapeville
Rosswell
Union City
East Point
College Park
SUBAREA TOTAL
Residual
D. ODUNTY TOTAL
(2)
Population
422,915
6,839
10,021
14,682
12,733
48,226
24,565
539,981
129,964
669,945
(3)
Allocation Proportion
.631
.010
.015
.022
.019
.072
.037
.8060
.194
1.0
Residual is equal to the COUNTY TOTAL (row D, column [2]) minus the
sum of the population accounted for by all specified subcounty areas.
N
RP = TPOP Z POP,
where:
RP - Residual population not accounted for
by specified subareas
TPOP = COUm TOTAL (row D, column [2])
POP. • Population in each specified subcounty
area i.
110
-------
Table 3.2-4
Kfotor Vehicle Data Allocated to Subcounty Areas
A. County
B. Year
Fulton
1980
C. Allocation Order .
Subarea
CD
Atlanta
Fairburn
Hapeville
Roswell
Union City
East Point
College Park
SUBAREA TOTAL
Residual
D. COUNTY TOTAL
VMT
(10 6 Vehicle-miles/yr)
(2)
LOG
1220.4
19.3
29
42.5
36.7
139.2
71.5
1558.6
472.2
2030.8
(3)
HDG
96.7
1.5
2.3
3.4
2.9
11
5.6
123.4
37.6
161
(4)
HDD
.1471
.0023
.0035
.0051
.0044
.0168
.0086
.1878
.0570
.2448
Average
Speed
(mph)
(5)
111
-------
A. Coimty Fulton
B. Year 1980
Table 3.2-5
Mator Vehicle Emissions ,U located
to Subcounty Areas
C. Allocation Order
Subarea
(1)
Atlanta
Fairburn
Hapeville
Rossviell
Union City
East Point
College Park
SUBAREA TOTAL
Residual
D. COUNTY TOTAL
Emissions
CiO6 tono/yr) < (10* grams/yr)
(2)
LOG
415
6.56
9.86
14.45
12.47
47.3
24.3
529.9
160.5
690.4
Part.
(3)
HDG
62.8
.975
1.49
2.21
1.88
7.15
3.64
80.21
24.44
104.65
(4)
HDD
.176
.0028
.0042
.0061
.0053
.0207
.0103
.2253
.0684
.2937
"x
(S)
LOG
158
2.51
3.77
5.52
4.77
18.09
9.30
202.62
61.38
264.00
(6)
HDG
25.1
.390
.598
.884
.754
2.86
1.45
32.08
9.78
41.86
(7)
HDD
.353
.0055
.0084
.0122
.0105
.0403
.0264
.4507
.1368
.5875
Speed
Correction
Factor
CO
(8)
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
CO
(9)
LOG
16E3
250
377
552
477
1809
929
20E3
6139
26E3
(10)
HDG
13E3
196.8
301.7
446
380
1443
734
16E3
4933
21E3
(11)
HDD
3.00
.0469
.0714
.1040
.0898
.3427
.1754
3.831
L.162
«.993
Speed
Correction
Factor
HC
02)
HC (exhaust)
(13)
LOG
(14)
HDG
(15)
HDD
HC(evap.)
(16)
Speed
Correct ion
Factor
NO,
(17)
"Ox
(18)
LOG
(19)
HDG
420)
HDD
NOTE: All emissions values are in millions of grams. Therefore, 120E3 is read 120 billion grams.
-------
Table 3.2-11
Transportation Emissions
Allocated to SubfcOunty Areas
A. County Fulton
B. Year
C. Allocation Order 1
(1)
Subarea
Atlanta
Fairburn
Hapeville
Rosswell
Union City
East Point
College Park
5UEA2EA TOTAL
Residual
D. COUNTY TOTAL
Emissions
(tons/yr)
(2)
Part.
527.0
8.3
12.6
18.4
15.9
60.1
30.9
672.8
204.0
876.8
(3)
SOx
202.2
3.2
4.9
7.1
6.1
23.2
11.9
259.3
78.6
337.9
(4)
CO
31975.8
492.6
748.4
1100.4
945.0
3585.7
1833.7
40681.5
12208.2
52889.7
(5)
HC
(6)
^x
113
-------
Table 3.2-1
Motor Vehicle Emission Factors
A.
B.
C.
County Fulton
Year
1985
Allocation Order
(1)
Vehicle
Class
LOG
HDG
HDD
Emission Factors
(grams/vehicle-mile)
(2)
Part.
.34
.65
1.2
m
X
.13
.26
2.4
f4)
CO
5.8
130
20.4
(5)
HC*
(exhaust)
(6)
HC*
(evap.)
(7)
NO*
X
*These pollutants have been excluded from this analysis because they
are to be treated on an AQCR basis.
114
-------
Format for
Table 3.2-2d*
Limited Access Highway Data
A. County Fulton
B. Year
1985
C. Allocation Order 1
Identification
Number
(1)
D. GOWIY TOTAL
Highway Segment
(2)
Begin
x y
' f
(33
x •" y
Length
(mi)
(4)
Annual Volume
(106 vehicles/yr)
(5)
LDG
(6)
HDG
(7)
HIM)
VMT
(10 6 vehicle-miles/yr)
(8)
LDG
(9)
HDG
(10)
HDD
Speed1
(mph)
(11)
If actual data are not available use design speed for highway segment in question.
*Statistical information for this table is presented in the following computer
printout tabulation with corresponding table no.
-------
VMf BV VEHICLE TYPE Table 3-2-2d Continued)
VEAR: 1985
LDG
(7)
5.838
45.136
14.190
23.185
81.165
55.389
31.544
18.339
11.300
25.440
18.613
11.181
9.760
3.896
26.735
39.954
16.632
35.743
31.943
11.599
55.215
32.217
33.538
23.546
27.321
19.236
18.837
16.619
HOG
(8)
0.436
3.369
1.059
1.730
6.058
4.135
2.355
1.369
0.881
0.000
1.390
0.000
7.286
0.000
1.996
2.981
1.241
2.667
2.306
0.866
4.122
2.406
2,503
1.757
2.041
1.436
1.407
1.241
HDD
(9)
0.135
1.040
0.327
0.534
1.871
1.277
0.727
0.423
0.272
0.586
0.429
0.253
0.225
0.228
0.616
0.921
0.383
0.324
0.699
0.267
1.273
0.743
0.773
0.543
0.630
0.444
0.434
0.383
116
-------
VMT by Vehicle Type
Year: 1985
Table 3.2-2d (Continued)
LOG
(7)
17.977
30.062
28 . 978
39,505
16.607
26.499
21.204
10.139
19.098
41.698
47.341
46.494
9.367
5.521
22.151
5.472
21.503
5.183
10.279
26.349
5.617
12.957
9.001
66.938
7.872
40.041
12.384
44.638
43.317
55.240
HDG
(8)
1.610
1.993
2.199
2.852
1.240
1.976
1.583
0.756
1.425
3.061
3.534
3.471
0.700
0.845
1.653
0.409
1.606
0.387
0.767
1.967
0.419
0.967
0.672
4.996
0,588
2,989
0.924
3.333
2.946
3.683
HDD
(9)
0.523
0.621
0.701
0.364
0.383
0.611
0.489
0.234
0.440
0.913
1.091
1.072
0.216
2.609
0.511
0.126
0.496
0.119
0.237
0.607
0.130
0.299
0.207
1.544
0.132
0.923
0.285
1.029
0.910
1.273
117
-------
VMT by Vehicle Type
Year: 1985
Table 3.2-2d (Continued)
LOG HDG HDD
(7) (8) (9).
27.£21 2.033 0,628
££.573 2.134 0.659
5.5£4 0.412 0.127
15. ££4 1.763 i5.547
12.157 0.907 0.230
15.£35 1,166 0.360
£3,355 . 1.731 0.553
£3.SS£ 1.733 0.551
*£.c74 - 3.633 1.122
•4.76£ ' 3,554 B.llu
2.7-7 0.£i33 0.064
!.£££ 0.092 0,028
5.£31 0.633 0.214
118
-------
Table 3.2-3d*
Limited Access Highway Emissions
A. Oouity Fulton
B. Year
1985
C. Allocation Order 1
Highway Segment
Sequence
Identification
(1)
D. COWTY TOTAL
Emissions
(10 6 tons/yr)
Part.
(2)
LOG
(3)
HDG
(4)
HDD
^x
(5)
LDG
C6)
HDG
(7)
HDD
Speed
Correction
Factor
$
00
(9)
LDG
(10)
HDG
(11)
HDD
Speed
Correction
Fa&or
nL*
(12)
HC (exhaust)
(13)
LDG
(14)
HDG
(IS)
HDD
HC(evap.)
(16)
Speed
Correction
fiietor
0*7)
*>*
(18)
LDG
(19)
HDG
(20)
HDD
.
- 'Statistical information for this table is presented in the following computer
printout tabulation with corresponding table no.
-------
1985 EMISSIONS IN TONS/VR
Table 3.2-3d
LOG
(2)
2.183
16.927
5.322
6.695
30.439
20.772
11.330
6.877
4.425
9.540
6.980
4.193
3.660
3.711
10.026
14.983
6.237
13.404
11.973
4.350
20.707
12.082
12.577
6.830
10.246
7.214 ,
7.064
Part.
HDG
•.&
2.415
0.759
1.241
4.344
2.965
1.688
0.982
0.631
0.000
0.997
0.000
5.223
0,000
1.431
2.137
0.830
1.912
1.653
0.621
2.956
1.725
1.794
1.259
1.463
1.030
1.008
HDD
(4)
0.178
1.377
0.433
0.707
2.477
1.690
0.962
0.559
0.360
0.776
0.568
0.341
0.298
0.302
0.816
1.219
0.507
1.031
0.925
0.354
1.685
0.983
1.023
0.718
0.834
0.587
0.575
LDG
(5)
0.837
6.472
2.035
3.324
11.638
7.942
4.523
2.630
1.692
3.648
2.669
"1.603
1.399
1.419
3.834
5.723
2.385
5.125
4.580
1.663
7.917
4.620
4.809
3.376
3.318
2.758
2.701
so*
(6)
0.125
0.966
0.304
0.496
1.737
1.186
0.675
0.393
0.253
0.000
0.399
0.000
2.089
0.000
0.572
0.855
0.356
0.765
0.661
0.248
1.182
0.690
0.718
0.504
0.535
0.412
0.403
HDD
0.356
2.754
0.866
1.415
4.954
3.380
1.925
1.119
0.720
1.552
1.136
0.682
0.596
0.604
1.631
2.438
1.015
2.181
1.850
0.708
3.371
1.966
2.046
1.437
1.667
1.174
1.150
LDG
(9)
18.674
144.377
45.389
74.161
259.624
177.174
100.301
58.660
37.746
81 . 374
59.536
35.766
31.219
31.653
85.519
127.800
53.200
114.330
102.176
37.101
176.616
103.053
107.277
75.317
87.391
61.529
60.254
CO
HDG
(10)
31.244
241.520
75.939
124.065
434.360
296.451
168.814
98.162
63.149
0.000
99.680
0.000
522.340
0.000
143.030
213.741
89.007
191.233
165.330
62.059
295.558
172.476
179.443
125.940
146.305
102.985
100.842
HDD
(11)
1.514
11.705
3.681
6.013
21.052
14.367
8.180
4.756
3.061
6.597
4.829
2.300
2.531
2.566
6.332
10.359
4.313
9.270
7.862
3.003
14.325
8.357
8.636
6.107
7.085
4.990
4.886
120
-------
1985 Emissions in~Tons/Yr
Table 3.2-3d (Continued)
'IDG
S%3
6.742
11.274
10.867
14.315
6,22*
9.938
7,952
3.802
7.162
15.637
17.754
17.436
3,513
2.071
8.307
2.052
8.064
1.944
3.855
9.881
2.107
4.859
3.376
25.103
2.952
15.016
4.644
16.740
16.245
Part.
HUG
(9
0.890
1.154
1.429
1.576
2.045
0.889
1.417
1.135
0,542
1.022
2.195
2.534
2.488
0.502
0.606
1.185
0.293
1.151
0,277
0.550
1.410
0.301
0.693
0.482
3.582
0,421
2.143
0.663
2.389
2.112
• Hnr~
0.507
0.692
0.822
0.923
1.144
0.507
0.30S
0.647
LI
0.309
0.583
1.209
1.445
1.419
0.286
3.453
0.676
0.167
0.656
0.158
0.314
0.804
0.171
0.395
0.275
2.043
0.240
1.222
0.378
1.362
1.204
LOG
(5)
2.383
2.578
4.311
4.155
5.665
2.381
3.800
3.040
1.454
2.739
5.979
6.788
6.667
1.343
0.792
3.176
0.785
3.083
0.743
1.474
3.778
0.805
1.858
1,291
9.598
1.129
5.741
1.776
6.401
6.211
SOx
ribu
(6)
0.356
0.462
0,572
0.631
0.818
0,356
0.567
0.454
0.217
0.409
0.878
1.014
0.995
0.201
0,242
0.474
0.117
0.461
0.111
0.220
0.564
0.120
0.277
0.193
1.433
0.169
0.857
0.285
0.956
0.845
HUU
(7)
1.015
1.384
1.644
1.856
2.288
1.013
1.616
1.294
0.618
1.165
2.417
2. S8g
2.837
0.572
6.906
1.352
0.334
1.313
0.316
0.627
1.608
0.343
0.791
0.549
4.036
0.481
2.443
0.756
2.724
2.408
LUG
(9)
53.160
57.504
96.159
92.692
126.365
53.120
84.761
67.325
32.430
61. 090
133.373
151.431
148.721
29.963
17.662
70.854
17,502
68.781
16.578
32.880
84.283
17.968
41,444
28.792
214.115
25.181
128.079
39.611
142.783
138.559
CO
HUU
(10)
S3. 998
115. 4Wl
142.911
157.649
204.452
83 . 891
141.661
113.525
54.235
1(55. 131
219.453
253.399
248 . 844
50.171
60.563
118.527
29.288
115.135
57,743
54.985
141.035
30.065
69.348
48.170
358.171
42.132
214.277
66.275
238.929
211.240
LUt»
cii).
4,ii3
5.5S4
6,986
7.3S5
9.723
4.307
6 . S63
5. 453
£.625
4.353
10.274
12.278
12.058
2.429
29.350
5.745
1 . 420
5.57S
1.344
2.666
6.834
1.458
3.361
2.334
17.366
2.042
10.383
3.211
11.577
10.235
121
-------
1985 Emissions in Tons/Yr
Table 3.2-3d (Continued)
LOG
(2)
28.716
10.209
10.713
2.072
5.357
4.553
5.863
8.99S
S.356
18.254
1.7S6
1.045
0.461
3.<4o4
Part.
HDG
(3)
2.640
1.458
1.530
0.236
1.268
0.651
0.836
1.284
1.278
2.605
2.543
0.143
0.066
0.497
HDD
(4)
1.685
0.831
0.872
0.163
0.723
0.371
0.477
0.732
0.729
1.485
0.145
0.085 .
0.037
0.283
LDG
(S)
7.921
3.303
4.038
0.732
2.273
1.743
2.242
3.441
3.425
6.373
0.633
0.400
0.176
1.332
SCbt
HDG
(6)
1.056
0.583
0.612
0.118
0.507
0.260
0.335
0.514
0.511
1.042
1.019
0.060
0.026
0.199
HDD
(7)
3.371
1.662
1.744
0.337
1.447
0.742
0.954
1.464
1.457
2.970
0.291
0.170
0.075
0.567
LDG
(9)
176.696
87.073
91.416
17.670
50.809
38.886
50.012
76.751
76.393
155.695
15.231
8.914
3.928
29.720
CO
HDG
(10)
264.028
145.769
153.004
29.565
126.834
65.051
83.630
128.441
127.816
260.455
254.628
14.916
6.574
49.715
HDD
(11)
14.325
7.061
7.413
1.432
6.149
3.152
4.055
6.223
6.194
12.622
1.235
0.722
0.318
2.409
122
-------
Table 3.1-1
Population-Based Allocation Proportions for Subcounty Areas
A. County
B. Year '
C. Allocation
Fulton
123
(1)
Subareas
Atlanta
Fairburn
Hapeville
Rosswell
Union City
East Point
College Park
SUBAREA TOTAL
Residual
D. COUNTY TOTAL
(2)
Population
439,832
9,096
9,821
19,380
16,298
47,940
26,039
568,406
188,632
| 757,038
(3)
Allocation Proportion
.581
.012
.013
.026
.022
.063
.034
.751
.249
,0
Residual is equal to the COUNTY TOTAL (row D, column [2]) minus the
sun of the population accounted for by all specified subcounty areas.
RP = TPOP
N
POP.
where:
RP » Residual population not accounted for
by specified subareas
TPOP - COUNTY TOTAL (row D, coluipn [2])
POP. - Population in each specified subcounty
area i.
123
-------
Table 3.2-4
Mstor Vehicle Data Allocated to Subcounty Areas
A. County
B. Year
Fulton
1985
C. Allocation Order
Sub area
CD
Atlanta
Fairburn
Hapeville
Eoswell
Union City
East Point
College Park
SUBAREA TOTAL
Residual
D. COUNTY TOTAL
WfT
(10 6 Vehicle-miles/yr)
(2)
LD6
1179.8
24.3
26.4
52.8
44.6
127.9
69
1524.8
770
2294.8
(3)
HD6
93.5
1.9
2
4.1
3.5
10.1
5.4
120.5
61.5
182
(4)
HDD
.1422
.0029
.0032
.0064
.0054
.0154
.0083
-
.1838
.0928
.2766
Average
Speed
(nph)
C53
124
-------
A. County Pulton
B. Year 1985
Table 3.2-5
Motor Vehicle Emissions Allocated
to Subcounty Areas
C. Allocation Order
Subarea
a)
Atlanta
Fairbum ,
Hapeville
Rosswell 1
Union City
East Point
College Park
i
SUBAREA TOTAL
Residual
D. COUNTY TOTAL
(2)
LOG
101.3
8.26
8.98
17.95
15.16
43.49
23.46
118.43
261.80
780.23
Part.
(3)
HUG
60.78
1.24
1.30
2.67
2.28
6.57
3.51
78.33
39.97
118.30
(4)
HDD
,1706
.•0034
.0038
.0077
.0065
.0185
.0099
.2206
.1113
.3319
(S)
LOG
LS3.
; 3.1*
3.43
6.84
, 5.79
16.62
8.97
198.
Wfl.
298.
<
(6)
HDG
24.31
.4940
.52
1.066
.9100
2.62
1.404
31.33
15.99
47.32
(7)
HDD
.3413
.0069
.0077
.0154
.0129
.0369
.0199
.4411
.2227
.6638
Speed
Correction
Factor
CO
(8)
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
Emissions
C-1Q6 tono/ysj * (10s grams/yr)
CO
(9)
LOG
6842
140
153
306
258
741
400
8843
4466
13E3 i
(10)
HDG
12E3
247
260
533
455
1313
702
15E3
7995
23E3
(ID
HDD
2.9
.0591
.0652
.1306
.1102
.3142
.1693
3.749
1.893
5.642
Speed
Correction
Factor
HC
(12)
•
HC(exhaust)
(13) j
LDG ?
i
\
(14)
HDG
(IS)
HDD
HC(evap.)
(16)
Speed
Correction
Factor
NOx
07)
NOX
(18)
LDG
(19)
HDG
{20)
urn
to
NOTE: All emissions values are in millions of grams. Therefore, 120E3 is read 120 billion grams.
-------
A. County Fulton
B. Year 1985
Table 3.2-11
Transportation Emissions
Allocated to Subtounty Areas
C. Allocation Order 1
(1)
S'jbarea
Atlanta
Fairburn
Hapeville
Rosswell
Union City
East Point
College Park
513A3EA TOTAL
Residual
L. C:UNTY TOTAL
(2)
Part.
509.6
10.5
11.4
22.7
19.2
55.2
29.8
658.2
332.8
991.0
Emissions
(tons/yr)
(3)
SOx
195.8
4.0
4.4
8.7
7.4
21.3
11.5
253.4
128.1
381.5
(4)
CO
20776.5
426.8
455.4
925.1
7^6.2
2264.9
1215.2
26850.1
13740.3
40590.4
(5)
HC
(6)
™x
126
-------
B.2.3 Comercial/Institutional Fuel Combustion Emissions
ALLOCATION PROCEDURE
All Orders
Isolate point sources.
Order 1
Allocate fuel use by population distribution.
Order 2
Allocate fuel use by employment distribution.
Order 3
Compute fuel use in each subarea.
127
-------
Allocation
Procedure
Sequence of Tables
All Orders
3.3-1
3.3-2
Order 1
3.1-1
3.3-9
3.3-10
3.3-11
00
oo
Order 2
3.3-3
3.3-9
3.3-10
3.3-11
Order 3
3.3-4
3.3-5
3.3-6
3.3-7
3.3-8
3.3-9
3.3-10
3.3-11
Fig. 3.3-1 Commercial/Institutional Fuel Combustion Allocation Table Sequence
-------
ASSUMPTIONS AND LIMITATIONS OF THE EXAMPLE FOR
COMMERCIAL/INSTITUTIONAL EMISSIONS
A. Fulton County is made up of ten superdistricts as defined by the
Atlanta Regional Commission Data Center. The following six super-
districts comprise Atlanta: #10, Central Business District, #11,
Northeast, #12, Northwest, #13, Southeast; #14, Southwest and #17,
Buckhead. The remaining four superdistricts (#15, Tri-Cities (East
Point, Hapeville § College Park), #16, South Fulton, #18, Sandy
Springs and #19, North Fulton) make up the remainder of Fulton County.
B. The percentage of commercial/institutional employees is obtained by
adding up the wholesale and retail trade, services, and educational
services employee columns in the 1972 County arid City Data Book.
C. The percentage of construction employees in the Tri-Cities super-
district is the same as the percentage of construction employees in
the East Point superdistrict. The East Point percentage of construction
employees is obtained from the 1972 County and City Data Book.
D. The percentage of coimiercial/institutional employees in the Tri-Cities
superdistrict is the same as the percentage of commercial/institutional
employees in East Point superdistrict. The East Point percentage of
commercial/institutional employees is obtained from the 1972 County and
City Data Book.
E. The percentage of construction and commercial/institutional employees
shown in the 1972 County and City Data Book for Atlanta, East Point,
and Fulton County remain constant throughout the forecast years.
F. The total employment for each superdistrict in Fulton County is derived
by taking the total employment minus the construction figures from the
Atlanta Regional Commission and dividing it by 1.0 minus the percentage
(in decimal form) of construction employees.
G. The number of commercial/institutional employees is derived by multiplying
the result obtained from assumption "F" (total employees) by the percen-
tage of commercial/institutional employees.
H. Since no construction or commercial/institutional employment data are
available for superdistricts #16, #18 or #19, these three superdistricts
are assumed to equal the residual difference between the Fulton County
totals and the sum of Atlanta (superdistricts #10, #11, #13 and #14 and
#17) and the Tri-Cities (superdistrict #15).
129
-------
A. County
B- Year
C. Allocation Order
Table 3.3-3
Conraercial/Institut ional Employment-Based
Allocation Proportions for Subcounty Areas
Fulton
(2)
(3)
Subarea
10 - CBD
11 - Northeast
12 - Northwest
13 - Southeast
14 - Southwest
15 - Tri-Cities
17 - Buckhead
SUBAREA TOTAL
Residual
COUNTY TOTAL
Commercial/
Institutional
Employment
41,877
37,957
21,211
18,619
14,800
16,511
13,798
164,773
4,858
169,631
Allocation Proportion
.247
.224
.125
.110
.087
.097
.081
.971
.029
1.0
D.
130
-------
TsMe 3.3-9
Comnercial/Institutional Fuel Use Allocated
to Subcounty Areas
Fulton
A. County
B. Year 1Q7n
C. Allocation Order
(i)
Suharea
14
10 - CBD
11 - Northeast
12 - Northwest
13 - Southeast
14 - Southwest
15 - Tri-Cities
17 - Buckhead
SU3AREA TOTAL
Residual
D. ACTUAL COUNTY TOTAL
E. COMPUTED COUNTY TOTAL1
Annual l:uel Use
Coal
(tons/ yr )
o>
1
"c
Bituminous $•
1976
1792
1000
880
696
776
648
7768
232
JOOO
at
"E
.5*
.Oil
(5)
£»
tn
0
934
847
472
416
329
366
306
3670
110
3780
(6)
"5
9
°3»
&
Natural .~-a>
,106 ft." y:- .
i";
3,211
2,912
1,625
1,430 1
1,131
1,261
1,053
12,623
377
13,000
This row will be used only in cases where an Order 3 allocation procedure is beirc
followed.
131
-------
Table 3.3-10
Commercial/Institutional Fuel Combustion Emission Factors
A. County Fulton
B. Year
1Q70
C. Allocation orders
(1)
3
6
i-t
•t4
o
Anthracite
Bituminous
Lignite
Distillate
Residual
Natural Gas
Bnission Factors
(2)
Part.
14.6
Ib/ton
15
lb/103 gal
19 _ .
lb/106 ft3
(3)
^x
64. 6
Ib/ton
30.24
lb/103 gal
0.6 _
lb/106 ft3
f4)
00
10
Ib/ton
4
lb/103 gl
20 . _'
lb/106ft3
(S)
HC*
(6)
NOX *
*These pollutants have been excluded from this analysis because they are
to be treated on an AQCR basis.
132
-------
Table 3.3-11
Comiuercial/Institutional Fuel Combustion Emissions
Allocated to Sub-County Areas
A. County Fulton
B. Year 1970
C. Allocation Order
Emissions
(tons/yr)
(1)
Subarea
10 - CBD
11 - Northeast
12 - Northwest
13 - Southeast
14 - Southwest
15 - Tri-Cities
17 Buckhead
SUBAREA TOTAL
Residual
D. COUNTY TOTAL
(2)
Part.
51.93
47.10
26.28
23.13
18.29
20.39
17.03
204.15
6.10
210.25
(3)
S0x
78.91
71.56
39.92
35.14
27.80
30.98
25.87
310.18
9.27
319.45
(4)
CO
43.86
39.77
22.19
19.53
15.45
17.23
14.38
172.41
5.15
177.56
fS)
HC
If)
NOX
133
-------
A. County
B. Year '
C. Allocation Order
Table 3.3-3
Connsrcial/Institutional Employment-Based
Allocation Proportions for Subcounty Areas
Fulton
1975
(2)
(3)
Subarea
10 - CBD
11 - Northeast
12 - Northwest
13 Southeast
14 * Southwest
15 - Tri-Cities
17 - Buckhead
SUBAREA TOTAL
Residual
COUNTY TOTAL
Commercial/
Institutional
Employment
45,091
38,150
23,736
19,641
16,064
18,151
15,801
176,634
10,664
187,298
Allocation Proportion
.241
.203
.127
.105
.086
.097
.084
.943
.057
1.0
D.
134
-------
Table 3.3-9
Commercial/Institutional Fuel Use Allocated
to Subcounty Areas
Fulton
A. County
B. Year
C. Allocation Order
(1)
Suharea
10 - CBD
11 Northeast
12 - Northwest
13 - Southeast
14 - Southwest
15 Tri-Cities
17 - Buckhead
SUBAREA TOTAL
Residual
D, ACTUAL COUNTY TOTAL
E. C^MR/TED COUNTY TOTAL1
Annual Fuel Use
Coal
(tons/yr )
Anthracite 5
(3)
Uf
9
&
2129
1793
1122
927
760
857
742
8330
503
8833
(4)
*e
o>
'It
.Oil
(10* j-aVyr ).
CS)
3
1
1006
847
530
438
359
405
351
3936
238
4174
16)
"Si
at
or
Natural Gas
(10ft ft 3/>T )
C)
3,459
2,914
1,823
1,507
1,234
1,393
1,206
13,536
818
14,354
This row will be used only in cases where an Order 3 allocation procedure is beine
101lowed.
135
-------
Table 3.3-10
Commercial/Institutional Fuel Combustion Emission Factors
A. County Fulton
B. Year
1975
r_
C. Allocation orders
(1)
•a
6
i— i
••-I
o
Anthracite
Bituminous
Lignite
Distillate
Residual
Natural Gas
Emission Factors
(2)
Part.
14.6
Ib/ton
15
lb/103 gal
19 c o
lb/106 ft3
(3)
^x
64.6
Ib/ton
30.24
lb/103 gal
°',6 S q
lb/106 ft3
f4)
CO
10
Ib/ton
4
lb/103 gi
20 c ,
lb/106ft3
(S)
HC*
(6)
NOX*
*These pollutants have been excluded from this analysis because they are
to be treated on an AQCR basis.
136
-------
Table 3.3-11
Commercial/Institutional Fuel Combustion Emissions
Allocated to Sub-County Areas
Fulton
A. County
B. Year
C. Allocation Order
1975
(1)
Subarea
10 - CBD
11 - Northeast
12 - Northwest
13 - Southeast
14 - Southwest
15 - Tri-Cities
17 - Buckhead
SUBAREA TOTAL
Residual
D. COUNTY TOTAL
Emissions
(tons/yr)
(2)
Part.
55.95
47.12
29.48
24.37
19.96
22.53
19.51
218.92
13.23
232.15
(3)
SOx
85.02
71.59
44.80
37.02
30.35
34.22
29.63
332.63
20.09
352.72
(4)
CO
47.25
39.80
24.90
20.58
16.86
19.02
16.47
184.88
11.17
196.05
(5)
HC
K6)
TOX
137
-------
Table 3.3-3
Comnercial/Institutional Employment-Based
Allocation Proportions for Subcounty Areas
A. County
B. Year "
C. Allocation
Fulton
980
er
(2)
(3)
Subarea
10 - CBD
11 " Northeast
12 - Northwest
13 - Southeast
14 - Southwest
15 - Tri-Cities
17 - Buckhead
SUBAREA TOTAL
Residual
COUNTY 'TOTAL
Commercial/
Institutional
Employment
48,305
38,342
26,261
20,663
17,329
19,790
17,804
188,494
16,470
. :fn .
204,964
Allocation Proportion
.236
.187
.128
.101
.085
.096
.087
.920
.080
1.0
D.
138
-------
••: .vci3l/Ir.stituticr.nl Puel Use Allocated
to Subcointv Areas
A. County FultOH
B. Year '
C. Allocation rirr
i
10 - CBD
11 - Northeast
12 - Northwest
13 - Southeast
14 - Southwest
15 - Tri-Cities
17 - Budchead
SU-WSA -:-.--L
RMidui:
D. ACTJAi. CO'J.T: "'T.-l
E L- v,r»-"- -•.-..—. — :• -
Annual Tucl Use
Coal
Anthrocite {•
Bituminous 5
2281
1808
1237
976
822
928
841
8893
773
9666
"5
.S1
. Oil
(10J y.ul./yr )
(5)
o>
O
1078
854
585
461
388
439
397
4202
365
4567
o
'35
at
K
Naturai_ ".:.-
3,707
2,937
2,011
1,586
1,335
1,508
1,367
14,451
1,257
15,708
Fnis row
folloved.
be used orjy in cases where an Order 3 allocation procedure is beir.j:
139
-------
Table 3.3-10
Commercial/Institutional Fuel Combustion Emission Factors
A. County Fulton
3. Year
1980
C. Allocation orders
(1)
-H
1
i— 1
•- 1
^
.Anthracite
Bituminous
Lignite
Distillate
Residua',.
Natural Gas
Emission Factors
(2)
Part.
14.6
Ib/ton
15
lb/103 gal
w e 0
lb/106 ft3
(3)
^x
64.6
Ib/ton
30.24
lb/103 gal
0-6 f
lb/106 ft3
(4)
00
10
Ib/ton
4
lb/103 gl
20 e ,
lb/106ft3
(5)
HC*
(6)
TWl *
wx
*These pollutants have been excluded from this analysis because they are
to be treated on an AQCR basis.
140
-------
Table 3.3-11
Commercial/Institutional Fuel Combustion Emissions
Allocated to Sub-County Areas
Fulton
A. County _
B. Year 1980
C. Allocation Order
(1)
Subarea
10 - CBD
11 - Northeast
12 - Northwest
13 - Southeast
14 - Southwest
15 Tri-Cities
17 - Buckhead
SUBAREA TOTAL
Residual
D. COUNTY TOTAL
Emissions
(tons/yr)
(2)
Part.
59.95
47.51
32.52
25.65
. 21.59
24.39
22.11
233.72
20.32
254.04
(5)
S°x
91.09
72.19
49.40
38.97
32.82
37.06
33.58
355.11
30.87
385.98
(4)
CO
50.63
40.12
27.47
21.66
18.23
20.60
18.67
197.38
17.16
214.54
(5)
HC
.
.V
NCX
141
-------
A. County
B. Year '_
C. Allocation Order
Table 3.3-3
Conoercial/Institutional Employment-Based
Allocation Proportions for Subcounty Areas
Fulton
1985
(1)
(2)
(3)
Subarea
10 - CBD
11 - Northeast
12 - Northwest
13 - Southeast
14 - Southwest
IS - Tri-Cities
17 - Budchead
SUBAREA TOTAL
Residual
COUNTY TOTAL
Commercial/
Institutional
Employment
50,925
38,777
29,249
22,046
20,149
22,521
19,877
203,494
23,505
226,999
Allocation Proportion
.224
.171
.129
.097
.089
.099
.087
.896
.104
1.0
D.
142
-------
Comnercial/Institutional Fuel Use Allocated
to Subcounty Areas
A. County Fulton
B. Year
1985
C. Allocation Order
Subarea
10 - CBD
11 - Northeast
12 - Northwest
13 - Southeast
14 - Southwest
15 - Tri-Cities
17 Buckhead
SUBAREA TOTAL
Residual
D. ACTUAL COUNTY TOTAL
E. COMPUTED COUNTY TOTAL1
Annual );uel Use
Coal
(tons/yr )
o>
'o
1
"c
«J
"
Bituminous 2
2398
1830
1381
1038
953
1060
937
9597
1109
10706
(4)
o»
.S*
-Oil
(10-> .',ul/yr )
(5)
S
in
S
1133
865
652
490
450
501
443
4534
524
5058
(6)
"o
3
at
tr
Natural Gas
(106 ft3/>r J
I")
3.897
2,975
2,244
1,687
1,548
1,722
1,523
15,596
1,80.1
17,397
This row will be used only in cases where an Order 3 allocation procedure is being
followed.
143
-------
Table 3.3-10
Commercial/Institutional Fuel Combustion Emission Factors
A. County Fulton
B. Year
1985
C. Allocation oroers
Cl)
f-l
rt
8
1-1
•H
o
Anthracite
Bituminous
Lignite
Distillate
Residual
Natural Gas
Emission Factors
(2)
Part.
14.6
Ib/ton
15
lb/103 gal
19 c ,
lb/106 ft3
(3)
SOx
64.6
Ib/ton
30.24
lb/103 gal
. 0.6 ,
lb/106 ft3
(4)
CO
10
Ib/ton
4
lb/103 gi
20 , ,
lb/106ft3
(S)
HC*
(6)
NOX*
*These pollutants have been excluded from this analysis because they are
to be treated on an AQCR basis.
144
-------
Table 3.3-11
Commercial/Institutional Fuel Combustion Emissions
Allocated to Sub-County Areas
Fulton
A. County
B. Year _
C. Allocation Order
1985
(1)
Subarea
10 - CBD
11 - Northeast
12 - Northwest
13 - Southeast
14 - Southwest
15 - Tri-Cities
17 Buckhead
SUBAKEA TOTAL
Residual
D. COUNTY TOTAL
missions
(tons/yr)
(2)
Part.
63.02
48.11
36.29
27.28
25.04
27.85
24.63
.
252.22
29.14
281.36
(3)
S°x
95.76
73.08
55.14
41.44
38.05
42.33
37.42
383.22
44.28
427.50
(4)
CO
53.23
40.63
30.65
23.04
21.15
23.52
20.80
213.02
24.60
237.62
(5)
HC
(6)
*>x
145
-------
B.2.4 Industrial Process and Fuel Combustion Bnissions
ALLOCATION PROCEDURE
All Orders
Isolate point sources*
Order 1
Growth in-situ»
Order 2
Growth in new areas only*
Order 3
Distributed growth.
146
-------
ASSUMPTIONS AND LIMITATIONS OF EXAMPLE
FOR INDUSTRIAL PROCESS AND
INDUSTRIAL FUEL COMBUSTION EMISSIONS
A. The total land area for each of the ten superdistricts comprising Fulton
County is computed by dividing the amount of used land (ULU) by the
percent of used land (UJLU). These figures were obtained from Atlanta
Regional Commission (ARC) computer output.
B. The subarea specific acreage devoted to industrial activity is calculated
by multiplying the total land obtained in step one, for each of the
superdistricts by the percent industrial land use (%ILU) for that super-
district.
C. The acreage change in industrial land from the baseline year to forecast
year is computed for each superdistrict by subtracting the forecast year
acreage from the baseline year acreage.
D. To allocate the change in industrial land among the various superdistricts
for each forecast year, the results obtained from step C are divided by
the difference between the county total of industrial acreage for the
forecast year and the county total of industrial acreage for the baseline
year. This subarea specific change in industrial acreage (A AREA) is the
factor used to calculate emissions attributable to the siting of new
point sources in each subarea.
E. Total emissions to be entered in columns (16)-(20) of Tables 3.4-4 and
3.4-8 are obtained for each of the forecast years by multiplying each
value in columns (16)-(20) for the baseline year by its process growth
factor for the appropriate forecast year. The new source emissions to
be entered in columns (10)-(14) or Tables 3.4-4 and 3.4-8 are calculated
by multiplying each of the five total emissions columns by the industrial
land use change factor (A AREA) obtained for each of the forecast years
in step D.
F. Emissions at existing point sources (columns (4)-(8) of Tables 3.4-4 and
3.4-8 are determined by subracting the new source emissions obtained
from step E (columns (10)-(14) of Tables 3.4-4 and 3.4-8) from the total
emissions; (columns (16)-(20) of Tables 3.4-4 and 3.4-8).
G. The point source emissions for any given source cannot be less than its
baseline year emissions. In the special case(s) where the point source
emissions obtained from the calculations of steps E and F are less than
the baseline year emissions, enter the baseline year emissions for that
point source in columns (4)-(8) of Tables 3.4-4 and 3.4-8 and subtract
these columns from the total emissions (columns (16)-(20) of Tables
3.4-4 and 3.4-8 to obtain the new point source emissions. This means
that forecasted emissions for an existing point source will be at least
equal to the emissions for its baseline year.
H. If the industrial land use change factor (A AREA) is negative, enter
zeros in columns (10)-(14) of Tables 3.4-4 and 3.4-8 and allocate all of
the total emissions to existing point sources.
147
-------
Allocation
Procedure
Sequence of Tables
Order 1
3.4-1
3.4-4
Orders 2 and 3
3.4-1
3.4-2
3.4-3
3.4-4
Fig. 3.4-1 Industrial Process Allocation Table Sequence
148
-------
Industrial Land Use Change Calculation: Fulton County Superdistricts
Total
1970 1975 1980 1985 1990
SD
#
10
11
12
13
14
£
to
15
16
17
18
19
Name
CBD
Atlanta
NE
Atlanta
NW
Atlanta
SE
Atlanta
SW
Atlanta
Tri-Cities
South
Fulton
Buckhead
Atlanta
Sandy
Springs
North
Fulton
1
ULU
60.18
65.31
50.39
53.96
39.94
49.37
4.50
71.26
29.36
5.38
ULU
(Acres)
595
5061
9169
8495
10659
7403
5718
11132
7222
4743
Land
Area
989
7749
18196
15743
26713
14995
127067
15622
24598
88160
1970
ILU*
13.40
10.26
9.15
7.22
3.48
5. SO
0.17
0.80
0.49
0.10
1980
ILUt
13.36
8.71
10.18
7.40
4.05
5.79
0.49
1.07
0.88
0.23
1990
ILUi
13.16
9.53
11.32
7.82
4.80
6.38
0.76
1.42
1.20
0.51
ULU
(Acre)
133
795
1665
1137
930
825
216
125
121
88
ILU
(Acre)
132
735
1759
1151
1006
846
420
146
169
145
ILU
(Acre)
132
675
1852
1165
1082
868
623
167
216
203
ILH
(Acre)
131
707
1956
1198
1182
912
795
195
255
326
ILU
(Acre)
130
738
2060
1231
1282
957
966
222
295
450
1975
AAREA
(-0.002)
-1/474
(-0.126)
-60/474
(0.198)
94/474
(0.030)
14/474
(0,160)
76/474
(0.044)
21/474
(0.430)
204/474
(0.044)
21/474
(0.101)
48/474
(0.120)
57/474
1980
AAREA
(-0.001)
-1/948
(-0.127)
-120/948
(0.197)
187/948
(0.030)
28/948
(0.160)
152/948
(0.045)
43/948
(0.429)
407/948
(0.04S)
42/948
(0.100)
95/948
(0.121)
115/948
1985
AAREA
(-0.001)
-2/1622
(-0.054)
-88/1622
(0.1791
291/1622
(0.038)
61/1622
(0.155)
252/1622
(O.OS4)
87/1622
(0.357)
579/1622
(0.043)
70/1622
(0.147)
134/1622
(0.147)
238/1622
FULTON COUNTY
TOTAL 20.66 70208 339832
1.78 2.06 2.45 6035 6509 6983 7657 8331
474
948
1622
-------
Table 5.4-1
l\iint Source Industrial Process Ijnissions
Fulton
A. County
B. Year
C. Allocation Order
1970
Indust .
Pro. CM
(1)
20
20
20
20
Source Identification
(2)
Name
Coffee Co.
Food Prep. Co.
Brewing Co.
Candle Co.
COUNTY TOTAL
(3)
!*rocess
209S
2099
2082
2094
(4)
Subarea
10
10
13
12
Coord. (5)
X
742.4
742.3
742.7
738.9
Y
3737.3
3739.2
3726.2
3741.9
Process ('.mission l-o recast (tons/yr)
(6)
GF*»
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
Tart. m
Cont .
Fjnis.
1
21
•>
£
5
29
SO, (8L
Cont .
Emis.
0
10
19
0
29
CO (91
Cont.
Fjnis.
0
0
0
0
0
HC (10)
Cont.
Ejni s
NO, fill
Cont.
Emis,
(12)
Emp.*
Table 3.4-1
Point Source Industrial Process Emissions
Fulton
A. County
B. Year '
C. Allocation Order
1970
Indust.
Proc.Cat.
HJ
26
26
Source Identification
l<£)
Name
Paper Bag Co.
Paper Coating
COUNTY TOTAL
(.*)
Process
2643
2641
(*)
Subarea
13
12
Loora. isj
741.5
739.4
3736.5
3739.0
Process Bnission Forecast (tons/yr)
10)
GF**
1.0
1.0
Fart. (I)
Cont.
Emis.
0
1
1
SOx l*j
Cont.
Emis.
0
1
1
U) (SJ
Cont.
Emis.
0
0
0
«; (.10)
Cont.
Emis.
f*Jx (11)
Eoht.
Emis.
(12)
E«p.«
A. County Fulton
B. Year ~l9lg
Table 3.4-1
Point Source Industrial Process Emissions
c. Allocation oroer ~ 3
Indust.
Proc.Cat.
(1)
28
28
Source Identification
(2)
Name
Inorganic
Pignent Co.
Paint Co.
COUNTY TOTAL
(3)
^TOCCSS
2816
2851
L <4>
SubsrcA
11
IS
Coord. fS}
x
740.5
738.7
Y
3741.5
3728.9
Process Emission Forecast (tons/yr)
(6)
GF**
1.0
1.0
Part. ni
Cont
Emis
2727
1
2S28
<«. f81
Cont
Emis
1000
0
1000
m (9\
Cont
TJni«
0
0
0
HT nni
Cont
[^nic
JJf\ fill
Cont
Emis
(12)
frffii*
•Employment
•"Growth Factor
-------
Table 3.4-1
Point Source Industrial Process Bnissions
A. County
B. Year
Fulton
C. Allocation
Indust.
Prgp.Cat.
(1)
29
29
29
29
Source Identification
(2)
Name
Paving Co.
Paving Co.
Paving Co.
Paving Co.
COUNTY TOTAL
(3)
Process
29S1
2951
2951
2951
(4)
Subarea
12
12
15
15
Coord. fS)
y
740.8
734.6
738.0
735.7
Y
3739.1
3740.8
5728.0
3724.7
.
Process Bnission Forecast (tons/yr)
(6)
GF**
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
Part. m
Cont.
finis.
38
2
2
50
92
so, rai
Cont.
Bids.
0
0
0
1
1
CO (91
Cont.
Ends.
0
0
0
0
0
HC flOl
Cont.
Bnis.
up, riii
Cant.
Bnis.
(12)
Br>.*
Table 3.4-1
Point Source Industrial Process Emissions
Pulton
A. County
B. Year
C. Allocation Order
1970
Indust.
Proc.Cat.
UJ
33
33
33
33
Source Identification
u;
Name
Steel Works Co.
Iron Foundry
Steel Works Co.
Sec. Smelt. Co.
COUNTY TOTAL
(.i)
Process
3312
3321
3312
3341
1*1
5ubarea
11
11
11
12
LOOTu. \3j
741.9
744.9
741.0
739.2
3742,1
3738.6
3741.9
3740. S
Process Bnission Forecast (tons/yr)
W
GF**
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
"art . (7 }
Cont.
Emis.
3446
36
301
5
3788
SJx W
Cont.
Bnis.
29
1
0
279
309
uu is.
Cont.
biu
LS.
3060
2199
3060
0
8319
ML UOJ
Cont.
Bnis.
NUx (LI)
^ont.
Bnis.
U-fJ
Eaf."
Table 3.4-1
Point Source Industrial Process Bnissions
A. County
B. Year
Fulton
c. Allocation Order 3
MOUSE.
Proc.Cat.
(1)
36
Source Identification
(2)
Name
Electric
Machinery Co.
COUJTY TOTAL
(3)
IjmQAee
3696
(4)
iubarea
16
Coord
X
727. S
fSI
3714.8
Process Bnission Forecast (tons/yr)
(6)
GF**
1.0
p«rt. m
Cont
Emis
202
202
SThr
Colt.
ff\_
Emis.
14
14
m rai
Cant
Emis.
163
163
HT f1(V\
Cont
fiuh
^P» nn
(12)
Kmn »
*Bnployment
**Growth Factor
-------
tn
N>
I able 3. .1-1
Point Source Industrial Process 1-nissions
A. County
B. Year
C.
Fulton
I97IT
Allocation Order
In Just.
''roc. (.'at
fll
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
14
Source Identification
fi1)
Name
rick Co.
Redi-Mix Concrete
(3)
Process
3251
3273
Redi-Mix Concrete 3273
Redi-Mix Concrete 3273
ron Foundry
Mineral Wool Co.
3221
3296
tedi-Mix Concrete 3273
tedi-Mix Concrete 3273
tedi-Mix Concrete 3273
tedi-Mix Concrete 3273
tedi-Mix Concrete 3273
:lat Glass Co.
3211
tedi-Mix Concrete 3273
tedi-Mix Concrete 3273
tedi-Mix Concret^
Crushed Granite
COUWTV TOTAL
3273
1423
(4)
Subarea
12
10
11
11
15
16
16
11
15
11
11
15
15
17
13
12
Coord. (S)
X
731.4
742.4
740.8
743.8
739.3
727.5
725.6
745.4
731.8
745.5
745. S
739.3
735.7
743.5
741.3
736.7
V
3744.4
3738.7
3740.1
5741.1
3728.7
3714.8
3716.6
3737.2
3726.0
2737.4
3737.4
3727.8
3725.1
3745.1
3733.3
3741.2
Process [mission Forecast (tons/yr)
(t>)
GF**
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
Part. (7)
Cent.
3650
2
3
1
175
209
1
1
2
2
8
333
2
1
1
150
4541
SO, (8)
Cont .
0
o
0
o
192
0
0
0
0
0
0
195
0
0
0
0
387
CO [9)
Cont .
Emis.
0
n
0
0
0
0
0
0
o
0
0-
0
0
0
0
0
0
HC
Cont.
10)
NO* (11)
font.
Emis.
(121
Bnp.*
•Employment
••Growth Factor
-------
Table 3.4-1
Point Source Industrial Process Emissions
Fulton
A. County
B. Year
C. Allocation order
1970
Indust.
Pme-Cat.
(1)
49
49
49
49
Source Identification
CZ)
Name
Refuge Systems
Jtefuge Systems
Steam Supply
Steam Supply
COUNTY TOTAL
(3)
Process
49S3
4953
4961
4961
(4)
Subarea
14
13
12
10
Coord.
X
0
743.8
740.5
742.1
(51
Y
0
3733.1
3738.6
3737.3
Process Emission Forecast (tons/yr)
C6)
GF*»
1.0 *
1.0
1.0
1.0
Part. (7)
Cant.
Ends.
0
10
2372
11SS
3537
SO. f81
Cont.
Brais.
0
1
S88
882
1471
CO f91
Cont.
Emis.
1
15
10
16
42
HC fl°1
Cont.
Bnis
NDv fill
G*lt
ftiiis
(12)
BID *
Table 3.4-1
Point Source Industrial Process Emissions
A. County
B. Year
Fulton
C. Allocation
Indust.
Proc.Cat.
u;
91
(Civil)
Source Identification
UJ
Name
U. S. Prison
COUNTY TOTAL
(.*)
Process
9100
l«J
Subarea
13
uoora. (i>)
743.8
3733.1
Process Emission Forecast (tons/yr)
W
GF**
1.0
Hart. (7)
Cont.
Emis.
6
6
J«x l»J
Cont.
Emis.
0
0
to 19J
Cont.
Emis.
6
6
HC U«)
Cont.
Emis.
NOx (11)
Cont.
Emis.
UZJ
BH>.«
Table 3.4-1
Point Source Industrial Process Emissions
A. County Fulton
B. Year
1970
C. Allocation uroer 3
Indust.
Proc.Cat.
(1)
91
91
Source Identification
(2)
Name
Armed Forces
Armed Forces
COUNTY TOTAL
L. {3)
'rocess
9100
9100
(4)
Subarea
11
14
Coord 1
X
744.3
737.8
fSl
Y
3737.2
3732.2
Process Emission Forecast (tons/yr)
(6)
GF**
1.0
1.0
Part. m
Cont.
Bnis.
0
2
2
9Ov m
Cont.
Emis.
0
2
2
m m
Cont.
Emis.
0
2
2
HT
Cont.
np)
finis.
NTlw fill
Cont.
Emis.
(12)
EfllD.*
"Employment
**Growtn Factor
-------
Table 3.I-:
Industrial Point ajid New Source Process hnusbioiis by Process Category
A. Coolly Fulton
B. Year 1970
C. Allocation Order 3
(1)
Industrial
Process Category
20
26
28
29
14 6 32
33
36
49 6 44
?1 (Civilian)
91 (Arred)
D. COUNT* TOTAL
Baseline Year
Existing Point Sources
(2)
'art.
2*
29
1
Ij??
!
387
33?
14
1471
.1
2
3214
(41
00
0
'5
•1
-
0
831?
If 3
42
6
2
8532
w
HC
«>)
^x
(7)
E»p?
._
forecast Year - All Sources
(8) ...
sat
GF**
. >trfci_
W/.
m
^t-
10)
»«
in
CO
(12)
HC
(13)
»»
«
f!4)
&1>?
forecast Year
Existing Point Sources
(IS)
tart.
(16)
"x
(17)
CO
(18)
IIC
(19)
^x
(20)
Cup?
forecast Year - New Sources
(21)
Part.
Cont.
Emis.
(22)
"x
Cont.
- .— .,
Efflis.
SHT555:
(23)
CO
Cont.
•- - . •
i..'..
*±'
s- -t- •-•
r
^ ici
Emis.
(24)
HC
Cont.
Ems.
(25)
N0r
Cont.
Bus.
(26)
B».«
tn
* Employment
"Growth Factor
-------
Table 3.4-3
Process Emissions by Process Category and Subarea
A. County _
B. Subarea"
C. Year
Fulton
10
1970
D. Allocation Order
Industrial
Process Category
(D
20
14 § 32
49
I-:. SIFBARI-A TOTAL
Total
Dfitp. •'
(2)
Point
Source
Emp.
(3)
New
Source
Biqp.
(4)
RAP*
(S)
New Source linissions (tons/yr)
(6)
Part.
0
0
0
0
(7)
SOY
0
0
C
0
(8)
CO
3
n
0
0
(9)
HC
fin)
NOY
location Proportion -
Table 3.4-3
Process Fmissions by Process Category and Subarea
A. County _
B. Subarea"
C. Year
Fulton
11
1970
D. Allocation Order
Industrial
Process Category
(D
28
14 § 32
33
91 (Armed)
E. SUBAREA TOTAL
Total
Prop.
(2) i
Source
Tmp.
(3)
Source
$•
RAP*
(5)
New Source ttnissions (tons/yr)
(6)
Part.
0
0
0
0
0
(7)
SOY
0
0
0
0
0
f8)
CO
0
0
0
0
0
(9)
HC
(10)
NO*
AlXocation Proportion ^
155
-------
Table 3.4-3
Process Bnissions by Process Category and Suharea
\. County _
B. Subarea
C. Year
Fulton
12
1970
D. Allocation Order
Industrial
Process Category
(D
20
26
29
14 § 32
33
49
F-:. SIFBAREA TOTAL
Total
Imp.
(2)
Point
Source
Fuip.
(3)
New
Source
Imp.
(4)
HAP*
(5)
New Source 1 missions (tons/yr)
(6)
Part.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
(7)
SOY
0
0
0
0
0
9
0
(8)
CO
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
(9)
HC
(10)
NOV
'Bnployment Allocation Proportion S"harea Category New Source Rnployment
K 7 K Total Category New Source Imnloyment
Imployment
Table 3.4-3
Process Bnissions by Process Category and Subarea
A. County _
B. Subarea
C. Year
Fulton
13
1970
D. Allocation Order
Industrial
Process Category
(D
20
26
14 § 32
49 $ 44
91 (Civil)
K. SUBAREA TOTAL
Total
Hmp.
(2)
Source
Imp.
(3)
Source
Imp.
(4)
RAP*
(5)
New Source Imissions (tons/yr)
(6)
Part.
0
0
0
0
0
0
(7)
SOy
0
0
0
0
0
0
(8)
CO
0
0
0
0
0
0
(9)
HC
(10)
NOx
^location Proportion
156
-------
Table 3.4-3
Process Qnissions by Process Category and Suharea
A. County _
B. Subarea"
C. Year
Fulton
14
1970
D. Allocation Order
Industrial
Process Category
(D
49
91 (Armed)
I-. SITBAREA TOTAL
Total
Ump.
(2)
Point
Source
Emp.
(3)
New
Source
Pntp.
(4)
TAP*
(5)
New Source Jimissions (tons/yr)
(6)
Part.
0
0
0
(7)
srv
0
0
3
(8)
CO
0
0
0
C9)
HC
(10)
NOy
.
AHocation Proportion -
Table 3.4-3
Process Emissions by Process Category and Subarea
A. County _
B. Subarea"
C. Year
Pulton
15
1970
D. Allocation Order
Industrial
Process Category
(D
28
29
14 $ 32
E. SUBAREA TOTAL
Total
limp.
(2)
Source
IJT\p.
(3)
Source
Hflip.
(4)
TAP*
(5)
New Source ftnissions (tons/yr)
(6)
Part.
0
0
0
0
(7)
SOy
0
n
0
0
(8)
cn
0
0
0
0
(9)
1C
(10)
NO*
*Bnployment Allocation Proportion
Subarea Catego
Total Category
New Source Employment
tew Source Employment
157'
-------
Table 3.4-3
Process Bnissions by Process Category and Subarea
A.
B.
C.
D.
County Hilton
Subarea ]
Year ]
6
L§70
Allocation Order
3
Industrial
Process Category
(D
14 5 32
36
I!. SI IBARRA TOTAL
Total
Bnp.
(2)
Point
Source
Bnp.
(3)
New
Source
Rnp.
(4)
HAP*
(5)
New Source Kmissions (tons/yr)
(6)
Part.
0
0
•>
j
(7)
snY
0
0
0
(8)
CO
0
0
0
(9)
HC
(10)
NOy
*Bnployment Allocation Proportion ^harca CateSory New Source linploymcnt
1 ' ' Total Category New Source Imployment
Table 3.4-3
Process linissions by Process Catcgon" and Subarea
A.
B.
C.
D.
County
Subarea
Year
Allocation
Fulton
17
1970
Order
3
Industrial
Process Category
(D
14 5 32
E. SUBAREA TOTAL
Total
limp.
f2)
Source
Imp.
(3)
Source
Imp.
(4)
TAP*
(5)
New Source linissions (tons/yr)
(61
Part.
0
0
(7)
SOy
0
0
(8)
CO
3
0
(9)
HC
(10)
NOX
*Employment Allocation Proportion
Subarea Catego:
Total Category
New Source Employment
tew Source Rnployment
158
-------
tn
<£>
A. County
B. Subarea"
C. Year
Fulton
Table 3.4-4
Industrial Point and New Source Process Emissions - Subarea Sunmary
1970
D. Allocation Order . . _j
Process Category
W
20
14 § 32
49
E. SUBAREA TOTAL
Point Source Emissions
NoHof
Sources
2
1
1
4
(.*)
Emp.*
l*J
Part.
22
2
1155
1179
IS.
10
0
882
892
C°)
CO
0
3
16
16
I7)
HC
(.8)
NOx
New Source Emissions
t9)
Emp.*
(10)
Part.
0
0
0
0
(11)
SOx
0
0
0
0
(12)
CO
0
0
0
0
(13)
HC
(14)
NOx
Total Emissions
"TO
Euro.*
(16)
Part.
22
2
1155
1179
(17)
sox
10
0
882
892
(18)
CO
0
0
16
16
(19)
HC
(ZO)
NOX
A. County _
B. Subarea'
C. Year
Fulton
11
1970
D. Allocation Order
Table 3.4-4
Industrial Point and New Source Process Emissions - Subarea Summary
Industrial
Process Category
iiF
28
14 5 32
33
E. SUBAREA TOTAL
Point Source Emissions
NoPof
Sources
1
5
3
10
(3)
Emp.*
00
Part.
2727
15
3783
6525
(5)
sox
1000
0
30
1030
(6)
CO
0
0
8319
8319
(7)
HC
(8)
N°x
New Source Emissions
fS)
Emp.*
(10)
Part.
0
0
0
0
(11)
sox
0
0
0
0
(12)
CO
0
0
0
0
(13)
HC
(14)
NOx
Total Emissions
fis)
Emp.*
(16)
Part.
2727
0
3783
6525
(17)
SOX
1000
0
30
1030
(18)
CO
0
0
8319
8319
(19)
HC
(20)
NOX
*linployment
-------
Ch
o
A. County
B. Subarea~
C. Year JO
IX Al location Order
FiiUon
Table 3.4-4
Industrial Point and Vv, Source Process Ems. '.ons - Subarea Sunmary
12
Industrial
Process Category
ID
20
26
29
14 5 32
33
49
E. SUBAREA TOTAL
Point Source Emissions
„ (2J,
No. of
Sources
1
1
2
-I
1
1
8
W
Enp.*
(4J
Part.
5
1
40
3800
5
23~:
6223
IS)
90X
0
1
0
0
279
588
868
(6)
CO
0
0
0
0
0
10
10
n
HC
(8)
NPx
New Source Emissions
(9)
Imp.*
HO)
Part.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
(113
so.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
(123
CO
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
(IS)
HC
(145
NOX
Total Fjnissions
(IS)
Emr..*
(161
Part.
5
1
40
3800
5
:3~:
6223
(17)
sox
0
1
0
0
2~9
588
868
(181
CO
0
0
0
0
0
10
10
m
HC
(26)
NO,
Pulton
A. County
B. Subarea
C. Year 1970
D. Allocation Order
13
Table 3.4-4
Industrial Point and Net. Source Process Emissions - Subarea Sumnary
Industrial
Process Cateoorv
w
20
26
14 S 32
49
91 (Civil)
E. SU3AREA TOTAL
Point Source Imissions
^:-if
Sources
1
1
1
1
1
5
(3)
Enp.*
(4)
Part.
•>
0
1
10
6
19
(5)
SO,
19
0
0
1
0
20
(6)
1:0
0
0
0
IS
0
15
(~)
HC
lS)
v\
Ne*> Source emissions
(9")
Imp.*
(10)
Part.
0
0
0
0
0
0
(11)
SOx
0
0
0
0
0
0
(12)
CO
0
0
0
0
0
0
(13)
1C
(14)
NO.
Total Emissions
71s)
FJ!J>.«
(16)
Part.
">
0
1
10
6
19
(17)
so.
19
0
0
1
0
20
(18)
CO
0
0
0
15
0
IS
(19)
HC
(.201
NO,
-------
o\
A. County Fulton
B. Subarea14 ~
C. Year 1970
D. Allocation order
Table 5.4-4
Industrial Point and N'e* Source Process Ixiissions - Subarea Suiman-
Industrial
Process Category
UJ
49
91 (Anted)
£. SlffiAREA TOTAL
Point Source Emissions
.. P),
No. of
Sources
1
1
2
isr
Erap.»
l«J
Part.
0
2
2
(i)
sox
0
-t
2
(6)
CO
1
2
3
(7}
HC
(8)
N(\
Ne\v Source Emissions
(9}
l.np.*
(10)
Part.
0
0
0
(11)
sox
0
0
0
(12)
CO
0
0
0
u?>
IK:
(14}
NO,
Total Fjnissions
nsy
am.*
tte)
Part.
0
2
2
a«5
SOK
0
->
2
iw
CO
1
2
3
(14V
HC
W)
NOX
A. County
B. Subarea
C. Year _
D. Allocation Order
Rilton
15
1970
Table 3.4-4
Industrial Point and Nov. Source Process lir.issions - Subarea Suonarv
Industrial
Process Cateeorv
ur
28
29
14 § 32
E. SUBAREA TOTAL
Point Source Lmissions
No.f2of
Sources
1
2
4
7
(3)
Ijnp.*
(4)
Part.
1
52
512
565
(51
SO,
0
1
387
388
(6)
CO
0
0
0
0
(7)
HC
(8)
N°,
Nek Source Ijnissions
(9")
Ijrqi.*
(10)
Part.
0
0
0
0
(11)
SO,
0
0
0
0
(1-)
CO
0
0
0
0
(131
IK'
Ti-Jt
>A\
Total Emissions
(15)
IjTlp.*
(16)
Part.
1
52
512
565
(1")
«\
0
1
387
388
(18)
CO
0
0
0
0
(19)
HC
(20)
NOX
*ljnployment
-------
o\
r-o
Fulton
10
A. County
B. Subarea
C. Year 1970
D. Allocation Order
Table 3.4-4
Industrial Point and New Source Process Imissions - Subarea Sunmary
Industrial
Process Category
UJ
14 § 32
36
E. SUBAREA TOTAL
Point Source Emissions
u ^)f
No. of
Sources
2
1
3
U)
Emp.*
14]
Part.
210
202
412
U>)
SOx
0
14
14
W
CO
0
163
163
cn
HC
(«)
NOX
*
New Source Emissions
" (9)
Emp.*
(105
Part.
0
0
0
(115
SOX
0
0
0
(125
CO
0
0
0
(15)
HC
(145
NOx
Total Emissions
(155
Enrn.*
(16)
Part.
210
202
412
(17)
SOX
0
14
14
(IS)
CO
0
163
163
(19)
HC
m
NO,
A. County
B. Subarea"
C. Year
Fulton
17
D. Allocation
70
Table 3.4-4
Industrial Point and New Source Process Emissions - Subarea Sunmarv
Industrial
Process Cateporv
uF
14 § 32
E. SUBAREA TOTAL
Point Source Lmissions
NoPof
Sources
1
1
(3)
Emp.*
(4)
Part.
1
1
(5)
sox
0
0
(6)
CO
0
0
(7)
HC
(8)
»x
New Source Emissions
(9)
l-jnp.*
CIO)
Part.
0
0
(11)
SOX
0
0
(12)
CO
0
0
(13)
HC
(14)
NOX
Total Emissions
(15)
Emp.*
(16)
Part.
1
1
(17)
SOX
0
0
(18)
CO
0
0
(19)
HC
(20)
NOX
•Employment
-------
OJ
Table 3.4-1
Point Source Industrial Process Emissions
A. County Fulton
B. Year 1575
C. Allocation Order
Indust.
Proc.Cat.
(1)
20
20
20
20
Source Identification
(2)
Name
Coffee Co.
Food Prep. Co.
Brewing Co.
Candle Co.
COUNTY TOTAL
(3)
Process
2095
2099
2082
2094
(4)
Subarea
10
10
13
12
Coord. (5)
X
742.4
742.3
742.7
738.9
Y
3737.3
3739.2
3726.2
3741.9
Process Emission Forecast (tons/yr)
(6)
GF**
1.054
1.054
1.054
1.054
Part. m
Cont.
Ends.
1
22
2
5
30
SOv m
Cont.
Ends.
0
11
19
0
30
CO f91
Cont.
Ends.
0
0
0
0
0
HC flOl
Cont.
Ends.
N°¥ f111
Cont.
Rm-ic,
(12)
En>.*
Table 3.4-1
Point Source Industrial Process Emissions
A. County Fulton
B. Year 1975
C. Allocation Order
Indust.
Proc.Cat.
UJ
26
26
Source Identification
12J
Name
Papier Bag Co.
Paper Bag Co.
COUNTY TOTAL
UJ
Process
2643
2641
15J
Subarea
13
12
coord, (b)
741.5
739.4
3736.5
3739.0
Process Emission Forecast (tons/yr)
(0)
GF**
1.367
1.367
Han . (/)
Cont.
Ends.
0
1
1
SUx UJJ
Cont.
Ends.
0
1
1
CD (9J
Cont.
Ends.
0
0
0
rc; (.10)
Cont.
Ends.
NOx 111J
'cent.
Ends.
UZJ
Emp.*
A. County Fulton
B. Year 1975
C. Allocation uraer
Table 3.4-1
Point Source Industrial Process Emissions
Indust.
Proc.Cat.
(1)
28
28
Source Identification
(2)
Name
Inorganic
Pigment Co.
Paint Co.
COUNTY TOTAL
(3)
Process
2816
2851
(4)
kibarea
11
15
Coord..
X
740.5
738.7
rsi
Y
3741.5
3728.9
Process Emission Forecast (tons^yr)
(6)
GF**
1.291
1.291
Part. m
Cont.
Ends.
3264
1
3269
so* m
Cont.
Ends.
1291
0
1291
m f91
Cont.
Ends.
0
0
0
Hf nni
Cont.
B|M
-------
Table 3.4-1
Point Source Industrial Process linissions
A. County Fulton
B. Year ia?5
C. Allocation Order
Indust.
Proc.Cat.
(1)
29
29
29
29
Source Identification
(2)
Name
Paving Co.
Paving Co.
Paving Co.
Paving Co.
COUNTY TOTAL
(3)
Process
2951
29S1
2951
2951
(4)
Subarea
12
12
15
15
, Coord. (S)
X
740.8
734.6
738.0
735.7
Y
3739.1
3740.8
3728.0
3726.7
Process Emission Forecast (tons/yr)
(6)
GF**
1.592
1.592
1.S92
1.592
Part. m
Cont.
Emis.
48
3
3
76
130
so, m
Cont.
Emis.
0
0
0
2
2
CO (91
Cont.
Emis.
0
0
0
0
0
HC (101
Cont.
Emis.
N0y rill
Cont.
Emis.
(12)
Eno.*
Table 3.4-1
Point Source Industrial Process Emissions
A. County Fulton
B. Year 1975
C. Allocation Order
Indust.
Proc.Cat.
UJ
33
33
33
33
Source Identification
UJ
Name
Steel Works Co.
Iron Foundry
Steel Works Co.
Sec. Smelt. Co.
COUNTY TOTAL
UJ
Process
3312
3321
3312
3341
l« J
Subarea
11
11
11
12
Loord. isj
741.9
744.9
741.0
739.2
3742.1
3738.6
3741.9
3740.5
Process Emission Forecast (tons/yr)
ft)
GF**
1.124
1.124
1.124
1.124
Fart . ( / )
Cont.
•
Emis.
3874
40
339
5
4258
SO* IB)
Cont.
Emis.
32
1
0
252
285
DO ISJ
Cont.
Emis.
3440
2473
3440
0
9353
HC (10J
Cont.
Emis.
NUx (11)
Cont.
Ends.
(1ZJ
Emp.*
A. County Fulton
B. Year 1975
C. Allocation ureter
Table 3.4-1
Point Source Industrial Process Emissions
Indust .
Proc.Cat.
(1)
36
Source Identification
(2)
Name
Electric
Machinery Co.
COIKTY TOTAL
(3)
3696
(4)
16
Coord,
X
727. S
1S1
V
3714.8
Process Emission Forecast (tons/yr)
(6)
GF**
1.362
Part. f71
202
202
srw fsi
14
14
rn f9i
163
163
»f noi
Cont.
JJTW nu
Cont.
Exuis
(12)
EfflD.*
^Employment
**Growth Factor
-------
en
Table 3.4-1
Point Source Industrial Process Emissions
A. County Pulton
B. Year 1975
C. Allocation Order
Indus t.
Proc. Cat
(1)
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
14
Source Identification
tf)
Name
Brick Co.
C3)
Process
3251
Redi-Mix Concrete 3273
Redi-Mix Concrete 3273
Redi-Mix Concrete 3273
Glass Ctr. Co.
Mineral Wool Co
3221
3296
Redi-Mix Concrete 3273
Redi-Mix Concrete 3273
Redi-Mix Concrete 3273
Redi-Mix Concrete 3273
Redi-Mix Concrete 3273
Flat Glass Co. 3211
Redi-Mix Concrete 3273
Redi-Mix Concrete 3273
Redi-Mix Concrete 3273
Crushed Granite
COUNTY TOTAL
1423
CO
Subarea
12
10
11
11
15
16
16
11
15
11
11
IS
15
17
13
12
Coord. (5)
X
731.4
742.4
740.8
743.8
739.3
727.5
725.6
745.4
731.8
745.5
745.5
739.3
735.7
743.5
741.3
736.9
Y
3744.4
3738.7
3740.1
3741.1
3726.7
3714.8
3716.6
3739.2
3726.0
3737.4
3737.4
3727.8
3725.1
3745.1
3733.3
3741.2
Process Emission Forecast (tons/yr)
(6)
GF**
1.289
1.289
1.289
1.289
1.289
1.289
1.289
1.289
1.289
1.289
1.289
1.289
1.289
1.289
1.289
1.289
Part. (7)
Cont.
Emis.
3774
3
4
1
217
153
1
1
3
3
10
409
3
1
1
153
4737
SOx (8)
Cont.
Emis.
0
0
0
n
237
0
n
0
0
0
0
240
0
n
0
0
477
CO (9)
Cont.
Emis.
0
n
0
t\
0
o
n
0
0
n
n
n
n
0
0
0
0
HC
Cont.
101
Emis.
NOx (11)
Cont
Emis
(12)
Emp.*
*Employment
**Growth Factor
-------
Table 3.-1 -1
Point Source Industrial Process linissions
A. County Fulton
B. Year 1975
C. Allocation Order
Indus t.
Proc.Cat.
(1)
49
49
49
49
Source Identification
(2)
Name
Refuse Systems
Refuse Systems
Steam Supply
Steam Supply
COUNTY TOTAL
(3)
Process
4953
4953
4961
4961
(4)
Subarea
14
13
12
10
Coord. (5)
X
743.8
740.5
742.1
Y
3733.1
3738.6
3737.3
Process Emission Forecast (tons/yr)
(6)
GF**
1.204
1.204
1.204
1.204
Part. (7)
Cont.
Emis.
0
12
2289
1390
3691
SO* (6)
Cont.
Emis.
0
1
568
1062
1631
CO (91
Cont.
Emis.
1
18
10
19
48
HC (10)
Cont.
finis.
NOv (111
Cont.
Emis.
(12)
Emp. *
Table 3.4-1
Point Source Industrial Process Emissions
A. County Fulton
B. Year 1575
C. Allocat ion Order
Indust.
Proc.Cat.
UJ
91
(Civil)
Source Identification
UJ
Name
U.S. Prison
COUNTY TOTAL
(*)
Process
9100
l*J
Subarea
13
Loom, (bj
743.8
3733.1
Process Emission Forecast (tons/yr)
(6)
GF**
1.269
Fart. (/)
Cont.
Emis.
8
8
SOx (8)
Cont.
Emis.
0
0
tu i»j
Cont.
Emis.
8
8
HL (IV)
Cont.
Emis.
NUx (ilj
Cont.
Emis.
(1ZJ
Emp.*
A. County Fulton
B. Year 1975
C. Allocation urder
Table 3.4-1
Point Source Industrial Process Emissions
indust.
Proc.Cat.
(1)
91
91
Source Identification
(2)
Name
Armed Forces
Armed Forces
COUNTY TOTAL
(3)
'TOCGSS
9100
9100
(4)
Sub circs
11
14
Cflprd, fSI
x
744.3
737.8
y
3737.2
3732.2
Process Emission Forecast (tons/yr)
(6)
GF**
1.0
1.0
Part C71
Cont
Emis_t_
0
2
2
-------
Table 3.4-2
Industrial Point and New Soilrcc Process Emissions by Process Category
A. County Fulton
B. Year 1975
C. Allocation Order
(1)
Industrial
Process Category
20
26
28
29
14 a 32
33
36
49
91 (Civilian)
91 (Armed)
D. OXWTY TOTAL
Baseline Year
Existing Point Sources
(2)
29
1
2528
92
4541
3788
202
3537
6
2
14726
(3)
a>x
29
1
1000
1
387
309
14
1471
0
t
3214
(«)
CO
0
0
0 -
0
0
8319
163
42
6
2
8532
(!>)
HC
(6)
"Ox
(/)
f*f*
Forecast Year - All Sources
(8)
GF*»
1.0S4
1.367
1.291
1.S92
1.289
1.124
1.362
1.204
1.269
0.810
'////,
(9)
fcrt,
31
1
3265
146
5854
4529
275
4257
8
2
83^0
(10)
SOx
31
1
1291
2
499
347
19
1771
0
2
3S63
HI)
CO
0
0
0
0
0
9353
222
51
8
2
9636
<")
HC
(13)
»x
(14)
ap?
forecast Year
Existing Point Sources
(15)
>art.
30
1
3265
130
4737
4258
202
3591
8
2
163M
(16)
*>*
30
1
1291
2
477
285
14
1631
0
2
'733
(17)
GO
0
0
0
0
0
9353
163
48
8
2
95-4
(18)
HC
(19)
"x
(20)
E»p!
Forecast Year - New Sources
(21)
Part.
Cant.
Enis.
1
0
0
16
1117
271
73
566
0
0
2:44
(22)
sox
Cont.
Ems.
1
0
0
0
22
62
5
140
0
0
230
(23)
CO
Cont.
-
Emis.
0
0
0
0
0
0
59
3
0
0
62
(24)
HC
Cant.
Ems.
(25)
NDX
Cont.
Emis.
(26)
Be.'
o\
* Employment
"Growth Factor
-------
Table 3.4-3
Process Rnissions hy Process Category and Suharea
A. County
B. Subarea"
C. Year
Fulton
10
1975
D. Allocation Order
Industrial
Process Category
0)
20
14 § 32
49
I!. SI IBARRA TOTAL
Total
I top.
(2)
Point
Source
Ijnp.
(3)
New
Source
Imp.
(4)
TAP*
(5)
New Source limissions (tons/yr)
(6)
Part.
0
0
0
0
f7)
SOV
0
0
0
0
(8)
on
0
0
0
0
0)
HC
fin)
NOy
'ftnployment Allocation Proportion g"harea Category New Source Employment
1 ' ' Total C.ategory New Source Imployment
Table 3.4-3
Process Emissions by Process Category and Subarea
A. County
B. Subarea
<:. Year
Fulton
11
1975
D. Allocation Order
Industrial
Process Category
(1)
28
14 § 32
33
91 (Armed)
E. SUBAREA TOTAL
Total
Ijnp.
(2)
Source
Imp.
(3)
-
Source
Hmp.
(4)
YAP*
(5)
New .Source ftnissions (tons/yr)
(6)
Part.
0
0
0
0
0
(7)
SOX
0
0
0
0
0
(8)
en
0
0
D
0
/
0
(9)
HC
(10)
*h
AHocation Proportion
168
-------
Table 3.4-3
Process Omissions by Process Category and Subarea
A. County
B. Subarea
C. Year
Fulton
12
D. Allocation Order
Industrial
Process Category
CD
20
26
29
14 § 32
33
49
!•:. SI IRAKI -A WAI.
Total
Itap.
(2)
Point
Source
Pmp.
C3)
New
Source
Hnp.
(4)
TAP*
C5)
New Source limissions (tons/yr)
(61
Part.
1
0
12
a-?!
1
566
1551
(7)
SOY
0
0
•^
V.
0
62
14C
2D2
(8)
c:o
r<
0
n
0
0
2
2
(9)
IIC
no)
•^
Motion r,,,»r,,cn
Table 3.4-3
Process linissions by Process Ciatcgon- and Subarea
A. County
B. Subarea
C. Year
Fulton
13
1575
D. Allocation Order
Industrial
Process Category
CD
20
26
14 § 32
49 5 44
91 (Civil)
I!. SUBAREA TOTAL
Total
liinp.
r:i
*Bnployment Allocation Proportic
Source
Imp.
(31
Source
limn.
(41
1:AP*
(51
New Source linissions (tons/yr)
(61
Part .
0
0
0
0
0
0
(7)
SO,
1
0
0
0
0
1
Subarea Category Mew Source Employment
Total Category New Source ftnployment
(8)
cn
0
0
C
1
0
1
(9)
IIC
(10)
NO,
* '
169
-------
Table 3.4-3
lYocess [missions hy Process Category and Suharea
\.
B.
C.
County
Suharea
Year
Allocation
Fulton
14
1975
Order
3
Industrial
Process Category
(1)
49
91 (Armed)
f-:. SIFBAREA TOTAL
Total
Imp.
(2)
Point
Source
limp.
(3) •
New
Source
Imp.
(4)
TAP*
(5)
New Source 'missions (tons/yr)
(6)
Part.
0
0
0
(7)
SOV
o
0
0
f8)
CO
C
0
0
(?)
IIC
(10)
.Vf\
AHocation Proportion -
Category New Source Imployment
Table 3.4-3
Process Emissions by Process Category a/id Subarea
A. County
B. Suharea
C. Year
Fulton
D. Allocation Order
Industrial
Process Category
(D
28
29
14 § 32
£. SUBAREA TOTAL
Total
Fmp.
(2)
Source
Imp.
(3)
Source
Imp.
(4)
RAP*
(5)
Nav Source Imissions (tons/yr)
(6)
Part.
0
4
29
33
(7)
»\
0
0
22
22
fS)
CO
0
0
C
0
(9)
HC
(10)
NOX
ic . . .,. .. D „ .. Subarea Category New Source Employment
*Bnployment Allocation Proportion = . r,tt* lm. cn,^r- PM^ r
Total Category New Source Employment
170
-------
Table 3.4-3
Process Bnissions by Process Category and Subarea
A.
B.
C.
D.
County
Subarea
Year
Allocation
Fulton
17
1975
Order
3
Industrial
Process Category
(1)
14 5 32
»
i:. SI IBARRA TOTAL
Total
Qnp.
(2)
Point
Source
Prop.
(3)
New
Source
Emp.
(4)
RAP*
(5)
New Source Bnissions (tons/yr)
(6)
Part.
0
0
(7)
SOY
0
0
(8)
CO
0
0
(9)
HC
(10)
NOY
Allocation Proportion -
Table 3.4-3
Process Emissions by Process Category and Subarea
A. County
B. Subarea"
C. Year
Fulton
16
1975
D. Allocation Order
Industrial
Process Category
(D
14 § 32
36
E. SUBAREA TOTAL
Total
limp.
(2)
Source
Imp.
(3)
Source
Imp.
(41
FAP*
(51
New Source ftnissions (tons/yr)
(61
Part.
117
73
190
(7)
so*
0
5
5
(8)
CO
0
59
59
(9)
HC
(10)
NOx
'Employment Allocation Proportion Subarea Category New Source Employment
* ' v Total Category New Source Employment
-------
A. County
B. SubareaI0~
C. Year
Fulton
Table 3.4-4
Industrial Point and New Source Process Emissions - Subarea Summary
1975
D. Allocation Order
Industrial
Process Category
W
20
14 § 32
49 § 44
E. SUBAREA TOTAL
Point Source Emissions
No. of
Sources
2
1
1
(•*)
Emp.*
Part.
23
3
1390
1416
SOX
11
0
1062
1073
CO
0
0
19
19
(7J
HC
(8J
New Source Emissions
Emp.*
(10)
Part.
0
0
0
0
(11)
0
0
0
0
(1Z)
CO
0
0
0
0
(13)
HC
(14)
NOX
Total Emissions
"7I5T
Emp.*
(16)
Part.
23
3
1390
1416
(17)
sox
11
0
1062
1073
(18)
CO
0
0
19
19
(19)
HC
(20)
NOX
Table 3.4-4
Industrial Point and New Source Process Emissions - Subarea Summary
A.
B.
C.
D.
County
Subarea
Year
Allocation
Fulton
11
1975
Order
3
Industrial
W
28
14 $ 32
33
91 (Armed)
E. SUBAREA TOTAl
Point Source Emissions
NoPof
Sources
1
5
3
1
(3)
Emp.*
(4)
Part.
3264
19
4253
0
7536
(5)
sox
1291
0
33
0
1324
(6)
CO
0
0
9353
0
9353
(7)
HC
(8)
NOX
New Source Emissions
(&)
Emp.*
(10)
Part.
0
0
0
0
0
(11)
sox
0
0
0
0
0
(12)
CO
0
0
0
0
0
(13)
HC
(14)
NOx
\
Total Emissions
(l§5
Emp.*
(16)
Part.
3264
19
4253
0
7536
(17)
SOX
1291
0
33
0
1324
(18)
CO
0
0
9353
0
9353
(19)
HC
(20)
NOX
^Employment
-------
A. County Fulton
Table 3.4-4
Industrial Point and New Source Process Emissions - Subarea Summary
12
B. Subarea
C. Year 1975
D. Allocation
Industrial
Process Category
UJ
20
26
29
14 § 32
33
49 $ 44
E. SUBAREA TOTAL
Point Source Emissions
.. (Z)r
No. of
Sources
1
1
2
2
1
1
(3)
Emp.*
I' J
Part.
5
1
51
3927
5
2289
6278
(5)
SOX
0
1
0
0
252
568
821
(6)
CO
0
0
0
0
0
10
10
17)
HC
(8)
NOX
New Source Emissions
C9T
Emp.*
110)
Part.
1
0
12
971
1
566
1551
(11)
SOx
0
.0
0
0
62
140
202
(12)
CO
0
0
0
0
0
2
2
(13)
HC
(14)
NOX
Total Emissions
(15)
Emp.*
(16)
Part.
6
1
63
4898
6
2855
7829
(17)
SOX
0
1
0
0
314
708
1023
(18)
CO
0
0
0
0
0
12
12
(19)
HC
(20)
NOX
Fulton
A. County
B. Subarea" 15
C. 'Year 1975
D. "Allocation Order
Table 3.4-4
Industrial Point and New Source Process Emissions - Subarea Summary
Industrial
Process Cateoorv
M
20
26
14 § 32
49 § 44
E. SUBAREA TOTAL
Point Source Emissions
NoPof
Sources
1
1
1
1
(3)
£mp.
(4)
Part.
2
0
1
12
23
(5)
sox
19
0
0
1
20
(6)
CO
0
0
0
18
26
(7)
HC
(8)
NOX
New Source Emissions
(9}
Emp.*
(10)
Part.
0
0
0
0
0
(11)
SOx
1
0
0
0
1
(12)
CO
0
0
0
1
1
(13)
HC
(14)
NOx
Total Emissions
(15)
Emp.*
(16)
Part.
2
0
1
12
23
(17)
SOX
20
0
0
1
21
(18)
CO
0
0
0
19
27
(19)
HC
(20)
NOx
*Employment
-------
A. County Fulton
B. Subarea 14
C- Year 1975
D. Allocation Order
Table 3.4-4
Industrial Point and New Source Process Emissions - .Subarea Summary
Industrial
Process Category
(1)
49 § 44
91 (Armed)
E. SUBAREA TOTAL
Point Source Emissions
.. We
No. of
Sources
1
1
(ij
Emp.*
l« )
Part.
0
2
2
15)
SOX
0
2
2
(6)
CO
1
2
3
(7)
HC
(8)
NOx
New Source Emissions
T9)
Emp.*
(10)
Part.
0
0
0
(11)
SOx
0
0
0
(12)
CO
0
0
0
713)
HC
(14)
NOx
Total Emissions
(Is)
Emn.*
(16)
Part.
0
2
2
(17)
sox
0
2
2
(18)
CO
1
2
3
(19)
HC
(20)
NOX
Fulton
A. County
B. Subarea
C. Year 1975
D. Allocation Order
15
Table 3.4-4
Industrial Point and New Source Process Emissions - Subarea Summary
Industrial
Process Cateporv
uj
28
29
14 $ 32
E. SUBAREA TOTAI
Point Source Emissions
NoPof
Sources
1
2
4
(3)
Emp.*
(4)
Part.
1
79
632
712
(5)
sox
0
2
477
479
(6)
CO
0
0
0
0
(7)
HC
(8)
NOX
New Source Emissions
W
Emp.*
(10)
Part.
0
4
29
33
(11)
sox
0
0
22
22
(12)
CO
0
0
0
0
(13)
HC
(14)
NOx
Total Emissions
(is)
Emp.*
(16)
Part.
1
83
661
745
(17)
SOX
0
2
499
501
(18)
CO
0
0
0
0
(19)
HC
(20)
NOX
*Employment
-------
cn
Fulton
16
A. County
B. Subarea"
C. Year__
D. Allocation Order
Table 3.4-4
Industrial Point and New Source Process Emissions - Subarea Summary
1975
Industrial
Process Category
UJ
14 § 32
36
E. SUBAREA TOTAL
No.lZof
Sources
2
1
Point Source Emissions
Emp.*
I*)
Part.
154
202
356
SOX
0
14
14
(6)
CO
0
163
163
17)
HC
NOX
New Source Emissions
(9)
Emp.*
(10)
Part.
117
73
190
SOx
0
5
5
(12)
CO
0
59
59
(13)
HC
(14)
NOx
Total Emissions
EOT.*
(16)
Part.
271
275
546
(17)
SOX
0
19
19
(18)
,00
0
222
222
(19)
HC
(20)
NOX
A. County
B. Subarea"
C. Year
Fulton
17
D. Allocation
Table 3.4-4
Industrial Point and New Source Process Emissions - Subarea Summary
3
Industrial
Process Cateeorv
M
14 § 32
..... &.&•••-• ,., ,
E. SUBAREA TOTAI
Point Source Emissions
NoPof
Sources
1
(3)
Emp.*
(4)
Part.
1
1
(5)
sox
0
0
C6)
CO
0
0
(7)
HC
(8)
NOx
New Source Emissions
(9)'
Erop.*
(10)
Part.
0
0
(11)
SOx
0
0
(12)
CO
0
0
(13)
HC
(14)
NOx
Total Emissions
TIS)
Emp.*
(16)
Part.
1
1
(17)
SOx
0
0
(18)
CO
0
0
(19)
HC
(20)
NOx
*Employment
-------
A. County
B. Year
Fulton
Table 3.4-5
Industrial Point Source Fuel Use
1975
C. Allocation Order
(1)
Industrial
Prnrn (^(r
32
32
Source Identification
(2)
Name
Mineral Wool Co.
Mineral Wool Co.
cownr TOTAL
(3)
Proc.
3296
3296
(4)
16
16
Coord. (5)
X
Y
Fuel Demand and Fuel Use Forecast
(6)
1.285
1.28!
1,28<
(7)
MBfTU
1380
516
1896
(8)
&np.«
(9)
COAL
(10)
IS
(11)
u
(12)
* OIL
(13)
ts
(14)
BOIL
(IS)
ts
(16)
NG
1315
1315
2630
.(17)
> GAS
(18)
LPG
(19)
COKE
(20)
TOOD
(21)
3-ASSE
(22)
DIES
(23)
GAS
A. County
B. Year ~~
C. Allocation Order
Fulton
Table 3.4-5
Industrial Point Source Fuel Use
197S
(I)
Industrial
Proc. Cat.
33
33
Source Identification
(Z)
Name
Steel Works
Steel Works
COUNTY TOTAL
(3)
Proc.
3312
3312
(4)
11
11
Coord. (5)
X
Y
Fuel Demand and Fuel Use Forecast
(6)
GF**
1.124
1.124
(?)
MBTU
61
483
544
(8)
=mp.»
(9)
COAL
(10)
IS
(11)
U
(12)
I OIL
405
405
(13)
ts
1
1
(14)
3 OIL
(15)
ts
(16)
NG
483
483
(17)
P GAS
(18)
LPG
(19)
COKE
(20)
WOOD
(21)
B-ASSE
(22)
DIES
(23)
GAS
Table 3.4-5
Industrial Point Source Fuel Use
A. County
B. Year
Fulton
1975
C. Allocation Order
(1)
Industrial
Proc. Cat.
49
49
Source Identification
(zT
Name
Steam Supply
Steam Supply
COUNTY TOTAL
(3)
Proc.
4961
4961
(4)
12
10
Coord. C5)
X
Y
Fuel Demand and Fuel Use Forecast
(65
;F**
1.204
1.204
1.204
(')
MBTU
5497
8857
14:3-
(8)
aip.*
I
(yj
COAL
2 woe
35524
59430
(10)
ts
1.48
1.50
(11)
U
12
8.2
UO
ROI1
(13)
ts
(14)
)OIL
(1!>)
ts
(16)
NG
(IV)
P GAS
(18)
LPG
US))
COKE
I/O)
WOOD
Ul)
34SSE
(22)
DIES
(23)
GAS
•Employment
••Growth Factor
-------
Table 3.4-1
Point Source Industrial Process Emissions
A. County
B. Year ~
C. Allocation Order
Fulton
1981T
Indus t.
Proc.Cat.
(1)
20
20
20
20
Source Identification
(2)
Name
Coffee Co.
Food Prep. Co.
Brewing Co.
Candle Co.
COUNTY TOTAL
(3)
Process
2095
2099
2082
2094
(4)
Subarea
10
10
13
12
Coord. fSl
X
742.4
74.2.3
742.7
738.9
Y
3737.3
3739.2
3726.2
3741.9
Process Emission Forecast (tons/yr)
(6)
GF**
1.188
1.188
1.188
1.188
Part. (71
Cont.
Emis.
1
25
2
5
33
SO, (81
Cont.
Emis.
0
12
22
0
34
CO f91
Cont.
Emis.
0
0
0
0
0
HC Q01
Cont.
Emis.
NO- fill
Cont.
*
Emis.
(12)
Emp.*
Table 3.4-1
Point Source Industrial Process Emissions
Fulton
A. County _
B. Year 198ff
C. Allocation Order
Indust.
Proc.Cat.
UJ
26
26
Source Identification
UJ
Name
Paper Bag Co.
Paper Coating Ce
COUNTY TOTAL
l-JJ
Process
2643
2641
l*J
Subarea
13
12
Coord, tbj
741. S
739.4
3736.5
3739.0
Process Emission Forecast (tons/yr)
T5T~
GF**
1.709
1.709
Fart. (7 j
Cont.
Emis.
0
2
•
2
SUx C8J
Cont.
Emis.
0
2
2
to IS)
Cont.
Emis.
0
0
0
HL 11UJ
Cont.
Emis.
NUx (11)
tont.
Emis.
UZ)
Enp.*
A. County
B. Year
Fulton
Table 3.4-1
Point Source Industrial Process Emissions
T980
C. Allocation uraer
Indust .
Proc.Cat.
(1)
28
28
Source Identification
(2)
Name
Irorganic
Pigment Co.
Paint Co.
COUNTY TOTAL
(3)
Process
2816
2851
(4)
5ubarea
11
15
Coord,
X
740.5
738.7
(51
Y
3741.5
3728.9
Process Emission Forecast (tons/yr)
(6)
GF**
1.654
1.654
P^rt f71
Cont.
Emis .
4180
2
4182
so« rut
Cont.
Emis
1654
0
1654
rn fqi
Cont
Emis
0
0
0
HP rim
Cont
Emis
uru fm
Cont.
Emis.
(12)
Emu.*
•Employment
**Growth Factor
-------
00
Table 3.4-1
Point Source Industrial Process Emissions
A. County
B. Year
Fulton
1980
C. Allocation Order
Indust.
Proc.Cat.
(1)
29
29
29
29
Source Identification
(2)
Name
Paving Co.
Paving Co,
Paving Co.
Paving Co.
COUNTY TOTAL
(3)
Process
2951
2951
2951
2951
L {4)
Jubarea
12
12
15
15
Coord. (S)
X
740.8
734.6
738.0
735.7
Y
3739.1
3740.8
3724.7
Process Ijnission Forecast (tons/yr)
(6)
GF**
1.989
1,989
1.989
1.989
Part. (7)
Com.
I;jnis.
61
3
4
94
162
SO, (6)
Cont.
Emis.
0
0
0
2
T
CO f91
font .
Fjnis.
0
0
0
0
0
HC (10)
Cont.
Emis.
J», fill
Cont.
Emis.
(12)
Emo.*
Table 3,4-1
Point Source Industrial Process Emissions
Fulton
A. County
B. Year 19817
C. Allocation Order
Indust.
Proc.Cat.
UJ
33
33
33
33
Source Identification
W
Name
Steel Works Co.
Iron Foundry
Steel Works Co.
Sec. Smelt. Co.
COUNTY TOTAL
(*)
Process
3312
3321
3312
3341
W
Jubarea
11
11
11
12
Loord. ibj
741.9
744.9
741.0
739.2
3742.1
3738.6
3741.9
3740.5
Process Emission Forecast (tons/yr)
16}
GF**
1.348
1.348
1.348
1.348
Fart. (f)
Cont.
Emis.
4645
49
406
6
5106
SOx (BJ
Cont.
Emis.
39
1
0
302
342
to (9J
Cont.
Emis.
4125
2966
4125
0
11216
ft U«J
Cont.
Emis.
NUx (11)
Cont.
Emis.
(12)
Emp.*
A. County R|lton
B. Year 1980
C. Allocation uroer"~
Table 3.4-1
Point Source Industrial Process Emissions
Indust.
Proc.Cat.
(1)
36
Source Identification
(2)
Name
Electric
Machinery Co.
COUNTY TOTAL
(3)
Process
3696
(4)
•Subarea
16
flnfirrti
X
727. 5
fSl
Y
3714.8
Process Emission Forecast (tons/yr)
(6)
GF**
1.826
Part f71
Cont.
1-mis.
211
211
sn» m
Cont.
Emis.
IS
IS
m f9i
Cont.
Emis.
170
170
Hf fin"!
Cont.
Emis
MX nn
Cont
Emis
(12)
fino.*
*Employment
••Growth Factor
-------
Tahle 3.4-1
Point Source Industrial Process IJnissions
A. County Pulton
B- >ear 198Q
C. Allocation Order
Indust.
Proc. Cat
CD
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
52
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
14
Source Identification
M
Name
Brick Co.
Red i -Mix Concret
Red i -Mix Concret
Redi-Mix Concret
Glass Ctr. Co.
Mineral Wool Co.
Redi-Mix Concret
Redi-Mix Concret
Redi-Mix Concret
Redi-Mix Concret
Redi-Mix Concret
Flat Glass Co.
Redi-Mix Concret
Redi-Mix Concret
Redi -Mix Concret
Crushed Granite
COUNTY TOTAL
f3)
'rocess
3251
s 3273
>. 3273
( 3273
3221
3296
i 3273
i 3273
( 3273
; 3273
( 3273
3211
; 3273
« 3273
* 3273
1423
M)
lubarea
12
10
11
11
IS
16
10
11
IS
11
11
IS
IS
17
13
12
Coord. (5)
X
731.4
742.4
740.8
743.8
739.3
727. S
725. 6
745.4
731.8
74S.S
74S.S
739.3
73S.7
742.5
746.3
736.9
V
3744.4
3738.7
3740.1
3741.1
S728.7
S714.8
5716.6
5739.2
5726.0
5737.4
5737.4
5727.8
572S.1
5745.1
5733.3
5741.2
Process Emission Forecast (tons/yr)
£1
GF**
1.630
1.630
1.630
1.630
1.630
1.630
1.630
1.630
1.630
1.630
1.630
1.630
1.63C
1.63C
1.63?
1.630
Part. (7)
Cont.
Fjnis.
4776
3
5
2
272
209
2
2 1
3
3
13
518
3
2
2
196
6011
SOx (8)
Cont.
Dnis.
0
0
0
0
299
0
0
0
0
0
0
304
0
0
0
0
603
CO (9)
Cont.
Emis.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
HC f
Cont.
•
10)
Emis.
NOX (11)
Cont
Fmi 5
(12)
Enip.*
*|jnplo>Tnent
**(',routii lactor
-------
oo
o
Table 3.4-1
Point Source Industrial Process Emissions
A. County Fulton
B. Year 1980
C. Allocation Order
Indust.
Proc.Cat.
(1)
49
49
49
49
Source Identification
(2)
Name
Refuse Systems
Refuse Systems
Steam Supply
Steam Supply
COUNTY TOTAL
(3)
Process
4953
4953
4961
4961
(4)
Subarea
14
13
12
10
Coord. (S)
X
743.8
740.5
742.1
Y
3733.1
3738.6
3737.3
Process Emission Forecast (tons/yr)
(6)
GF**
1.483
1.483
1.483
1.483
Part. m
Cent.
Bnis.
0
15
2824
1713
4552
SO, (81
rcont.
Bnis.
0
1
700
1308
2009
CO (91
Cont.
Ends.
1
21
12
24
58
HC flO)
Cont.
finis.
NO, rill
Cont.
finis.
(12)
Bnp.*
Table 3.4-1
Point Source Industrial Process Emissions
A. County
B. Year ~~
C. Allocation Order
Pulton
1980
Indust.
Proc.Cat.
UJ
91
(Civil)
Source Identification
UJ
Name
U.S. Prison
COUNTY TOTAL
(*)
Process
9100
l*J
Subarea
13
uxmi. ibj
743.8
3733.1
Process Emission Forecast (tons/yr)
C6T
GF**
1.673
part. (f)
Cont.
Bnis.
10
10
SOx (.SJ
Cont.
Bnis.
0
0
LU 19J
Cont.
finis.
10
10
HL 11UJ
Cont.
Bnis.
NUx (11)
^Cont,
finis.
U*J
Bnp.*
A. County Fulton
B. Year ivsu
C. Allocation uroer
Table 3.4-1
taint Source Industrial Process Emissions
Indus t.
Proc.Cat.
(1)
91
91
Source Identification
(2)
Name
Armed Forces
Armed Forces
COUNTY TOTAL
(3)
*rocess
9100
9100
(4)
Sub area
11
14
Coord.
x
744.3
737.8
fSl
Y
3737.2
3732.2
Process Emission Forecast (tons/yr)
(6)
GF**
1.0
1.0
Part m
Cont
Emis
0
2
2
<5QH fR'1
Cont
finis
0
2
2
m f9i
Cont
Emis.
0
2
2
HT HOI
Cont.
Emis
NTV rm
Cont.
Bnis
(12)
Jar *
*Bnployment
"Growth Factor
-------
Table 3.4-J
Industrial Point ajiJ New Souivc Process Ijiussions h> Process Category
A. County Fulton'
B. Year 1980
C. Allocation Order
(1)
Industrial
Process Category
20
26
28
29
14 6 32
33
36
49
91 (Civilian)
91 (Armed)
D. OXKIY TOTAL
Baseline Year
Existing Point Sources
(2)
Part.
29
1
2528
92
4541
3788
202
3537
6
2
14726
(4)
"x
29
1
1000
1
387
309
14
14"!
0
2
3214
(4)
00
0
0
0
0
0
8319
163
•12
6
?
8532
(M
HC
(6)
»x
(7)
Enp*
Forecast Year - Al 1 Sources
(8)
GF««
1.188
1.709
1.654
1.989
1.630
1.348
1.826
1.483
1.672
J.872
'////,
(«)
Part
34
2
(182
183
7403
sir
36J
5245
10
•>
22537
(10)
*>,
34
•>
1654
t
631
•11"
2'j
2131
3
1
4)4)
CO
0
0
0
0
0
11216
298
62
10
2
1588
(12)
I1C
(13)
»«
(14)
BV*
foreiast Year
Ijustinq Point Sources
(IS)
>art.
33
2
4182
1S2
6D11
SI3S
211
•:j52
1.1
•>
20271
(16)
^x
34
2
liS4
2
633
342
15
23.1?
3
7
4663
O7)
00
0
0
0
0
3
112K
n;
5!
i:
11456
(18)
HC
(19)
*«
(20)
Exf*
Forecast Year - New Sources
(21)
Part.
Cont.
Ems.
1
0
0
21
1392
1
158
693
3
3
2266
(22)
sox
Cont.
Bus.
0
0
0
0
28
75
11
172
0
0
286
(23)
CO
Cont.
Ends.
0
0
0
0
0
0
128
4
0
0
132
(24)
HC
Cont.
Enus.
(25)
NO
Cont.
Bus.
(26)
Bo •
00
* Bq>loynent
"Growth Factor
-------
Table 3.4-3
Process Bnissions by Process Cateuory and Suharea
\.
B.
C.
D.
County
Sub area
Year
Allocation
Fulton-
10
1980
Order
3
Industrial
Process Category
CD
20
14 § 32
49
!•:. SIFBAREA TOTAL
Total
Qnp.
(2)
Point
Source
Emp.
(3)
New
Source
Pimp.
(4)
I-AP*
(5)
New Source Emissions (tons/yr)
(6)
Part.
o
•^
•j
0
0
(?)
SOY
0
0
•>
0
(8)
CO
0
0
0
i
*>
(9)
HC
(10)
NOy
'Employment Allocation Proportion = ^area Category New Source Employment
v ' ' Total Category New Source linployment
Table 3.4-3
Process Rmissions by Process Category and Subarea
A. County
B. Subarea
C. Year
Fulton
II
____
D. Allocation Order
980
Industrial
Process Category
CD
28
14 § 32
33
91 (Armed)
E. SUBAREA TOTAL
Total
Imp.
(2)
Source
linp.
(3)
•
Source
Imp.
(4)
HAP*
(S)
New Source Bnissions (tons/yr)
(6)
Part.
0
0
0
0
0
(7)
so*
0
0
0
0
0
(8)
CO
0
0
0
f\
0
(9)
HC
(10)
NOx
'Employment Allocation Proportion
Suharea Category New Source limployment
Total Category New Source Employment
182
-------
Table 3.4-3
Process Qnissions by Process Category and Suharea
A. County .
B. Subarea
C. Year
Fulton
«- • • V»W* f pm_
D. Allocation Order
Industrial
Process Category
(D
20
26
29
14 § 32
33
49
i;. SlIBAREA TOTAL
Total
Blip.
(2)
Point
Source
laiTp.
(3)
New
Source
TT__
rJllp.
(4)
r*AD*
rJ\r
(5)
Nev
(6)
Part.
1
0
16
1222
1
694
1934
i Source I
(7)
SOY
0
.0
0
0
74
172
246
missions
C8)
CO
0
0
0
0
0
3
3
(tons/yrj
O)
HC
(10)
N0¥
!
'." ]
: 1
Allocation Proportion
Table 3.4-3
Process Bnissions by Process Category and Subarea
A. County _
B. Subarea"
C. Year
Fulton
13
1980
D. Allocation Order
Industrial
Process Category
(D
20
26
14 $ 32
49
91 (Civil)
E. SUBAREA TOTAL
Total
pjnp.
(2)
Source
limp.
(3)
Source
ftnp.
(4)
KAP*
(5)
New Source ftnissions (tons/yr)
(6)
Part.
0
0
0
0
0
0
(7)
so*
1
0
0
0
0
1
(3)
CO
0
0
0
1
0
1
(9)
HC
(10)
NOX
*Employment Allocation Proportion - ^barea Category New SourceEmployment
^ ' v Total Category New Source Bnployment
183
-------
Table V4-*
Process bnissions by Prorcss Category and Subarea
A.
H. Suhurra
C. Year
Pulton
4
19 SO
I). Allocation Order
Industrial
Process Category
0)
W
91 (Armed)
1 . SlfMKliA TdTAI.
Iota]
Imp.
(2)
Point
Source
Hmp.
fSJ
New
Source
finp,
(4)
I!AP*
(5)
New Source- fjnlssiuns (tons/yr)
f(.)
I'jirt .
0
0
0
f7)
»)y
0
0
0
ffl)
m
0
0
0
(9)
ir
nnj
Nnv
-linployment All...';.tion Proportion - ^fe;«f r-'.'^lT
' ' ' Total ( ;itc);orv
|Jnpiov7iiiinf
Process linisslons by I'roicss ( '
;ui
-------
Table 3.4-3
Process Dnissions by Process Category and Subarea
A. County
H. Suharea
C. Year
1), Allocation
Pulton
!
6
no
Order
5
Industrial
Process Category
OJ
14 6 32
36
I!. SlfHARHA TOTAL
Total
I hip.
m
*Iinployment Allocation Proportio
Point
Source
limp.
(3)
New
Source
limp.
f4)
JAP*
fr>)
New Source 1 missions Tton»//r)
no
1',-irt .
H2
158
290
(7J
•V),
0
1]
11
B Subnrca Cnte^ory New Source Umploymcnf
Total TTatejjory New Source Tjnploymcnt
(«J
(i)
0
128
128
c.n
IK
(in)
.M),
Table 3.4-3
Process Itolssions by Process Category and Subarea
A. County m
fi. Subarea"
C. Year
Pulton
D. Allocation Order
Industrial
Process Category
(1)
14 8 32
li, SimARUA TOTAL
Total
limp,
m
*ftnployment Allocation Proportic
Source
Ftop.
(3)
Source
Jtop.
(V
IAJ'*
fr'l
New Source Nnlssions (tons/yr)
f6)
Part.
0
0
W
sny
0
0
_ Subarea Category New Source rsmplojuwnt
Totfll rntegory New Source rmployment
f8)
rn
0
0
W
MC
noj
NOj,
185
-------
00
A. County _
B. Subarea
C. Year
Fulton
Table 3.4-4
Industrial Point and New Source Process Emissions - Subarea Sunrnary
1980
D. Allocation Order
Industrial
Process Category
(l)
20
14 § 32
49
E. SUBAREA TOTAL
Point Source Emissions
No.Uof
Sources
2
1
1
1.3J
DlDp*
fj
Part.
26
3
1713
1742
(5)
SOX
12
0
1308
..„».—
1320
(6)
CO
0
0
24
24
(7)
HC
(8)
NOX
New Source Emissions
19}
Emp.*
CIO)
Part.
0
0
0
0
(11)
SOX
0
0
0
0
(12)
CO
0
0
0
0
(13)
HC
(14)
NOX
Total Emissions
risr
Emp.*
(16)
Part.
26
3
1713
1742
(17)
SOX
12
0
1308
1320
(18)
CO
0
0
24
24
(19)
HC
(20)
NOx
Fulton
A.
B.
C. Year 1980
D. Allocation Order
11
Table 3.4-4
Industrial Point and New Source Process Emissions - Subarea Summary
Industrial
Process Catecorv
M
28
14 § 32
33
91 (Armed)
:. SUBAREA TOTAL
Point Source Emissions
NoPof
Sources
1
S
3
1
(3)
Emp.*
(4)
Part.
4180
24
5100
0
9204
(5)
sox
1654
0
40
0
1694
(6)
CO
0
0
11216
0
11216
(7)
HC
(8)
NOx
New Source Emissions
ft)
Emp.*
(10)
Part.
0
0
0
0
0
(11)
SOx
0
0
0
0
0
(12)
CO
0
0
0
0
0
(13)
HC
(14)
NOX
Total Emissions
7155
Emp.*
(16)
Part.
4180
24
5100
0
9304
(17)
SOX
1654
0
40
0
1694
(18)
CO
0
0
11216
0
11216
(19)
HC
(20)
NOx
'Employment
-------
A. County
B. Subarea'
C. Year
Fulton
Table 3.4-4
Industrial Point and New Source Process Emissions - Subarea Suimary
1980
D. Allocation Order
Process Category
W
20
26
29
14 § 32
33
49
E. SUBAREA TOTAL
Point Source Emissions
No.^of
Sources
1
1
2
2
1
1
l-*J
Emp.*
l*J
Part.
5
2
64
4972
6
2824
7873
(5)
SOX
0
2
0
0
302
700
1004
(6)
CO
0
0
0
0
0
12
12
(7)
HC
(8)
*»x
New Source Emissions
~I53
Emp.*
(10)
Part.
1
0
16
1222
1
694
1934
(11)
SOx
0
0
0
0
74
172
246
(12)
CO
0
0
0
0
0
3
3
(13)
HC
(14)
NOX
Total Emissions
CIS}
Emu.*
(16)
Part.
6
2
80
6194
7
3518
9807
(17)
SOX
0
2
0
0
376
872
12SO
(18)
CO
0
0
0
0
0
IS
IS
(19)
HC
(20)
NOx
I-1
00
-4
A. County Fulton
B. Subarea"" 15
C. Year * _I980
D. Allocation
Table 3.4-4
Industrial Point and New Source Process Emissions - Subarea Summary
Industrial
Process Cateeorv
w
20
26
14 5 32
49 $ 44
91 (Civil)
E. SUBAREA TOTAL
Point Source Emissions
NoPof
Sources
1
1
1
1
1
C3)
Emp.*
(4)
Part.
2
0
2
15
10
29
(5)
SOx
22
0
0
1
0
23
(6)
CO
0
0
0
21
10
31
(7)
HC
(8)
NOX
New Source Emissions
W
Emp.*
(10)
Part.
0
0
0
0
0
0
(11)
SOx
1
0
0
0
0
1
(12)
CO
0
0
0
1
0
1
(13)
HC
(14)
NOx
Total Emissions
~n~si
Emp.*
(16)
Part.
2
0
2
15
10
29
(17)
SOx
23
0
0
1
0
24
(18)
CO
0
0
0
22
10
32
(19)
HC
(20)
NOx
•Employment
-------
00
00
A. County Fulton
B. Subarea~ 14 ~
C. Year 1980
Table 3.4-4
Industrial Point and New Source Process Emissions - Subarea Stannary
D. Allocation Order
Industrial
Process Category
11)
49
91 (Armed)
E. SUHAREA TOTAL
Point Source Emissions
No.Uof
Sources
1
1
l-SJ
Emp.*
l*J
Part.
0
2
2
W
sox
0
2
2
(6)
CO
1
2
3
V)
HC
(8)
NOx
New Source Emissions
T9)
Qnp.
(10)
Part.
0
0
0
(H)
so*
0
0
0
(12)
CO
0
0
0
(13)
HC
(14)
NOX
Total Bnissions
^UST
Emp.*
(16)
Part.
0
2
2
(17)
SOX
0
2
2
(18)
CO
1
2
3
(19)
HC
(20)
NOx
A. County
B. Subarea
C. Year ^
D. Allocation
Pulton
Table 3.4-4
Industrial Point and New Source Process Emissions - Subarea Suronary
Industrial
Process Cateeorv
fir
28
29
14 § 32
E. SUBAREA TOTAI
Point Source Emissions
NoPof
Sources
1
2
4
(3)
Emp.*
W
Part.
2
98
798
898
(5)
SOX
0
2
603
605
(6)
CO
0
0
0
0
(7)
HC
(8)
NOX
New Source Emissions
(95
Emp.*
(10)
Part.
0
5
37
42
(11)
SOX
0
0
28
28
(12)
CO
0
0
0
0
(13)
HC
(14)
NOx
Total Emissions
fisl
Bnp.
(16)
Part.
2
103
835
940
(17)
SO,
0
2
631
633
(18)
CO
0
0
0
0
(19)
HC
(20)
NOx
*Employment
-------
CO
Fulton
A. County
B. Subarea"" 16
C. Year 1980
D. Allocation Order
Table 3.4-4
Industrial Point and New Source Process Emissions - Subarea Summary
Industrial
Process Category
(i)
14 $ 32
36
E. SUBAREA TOTAL
» lZJ/r
No. of
Sources
2
1
.
Point Source Emissions
l^J
Ernp.*
I'J
Part.
211
211
422
(5)
SOX
'.... 0
15
IS
(6)
CO
0
170
170
(?)
HC
(8)
NOx
New Source Emissions
~T5J~
Emp.*
110)
Part.
132
1S8
290
(11)
SOx
0..
11
11
(12)
CO
, 0
128
128
TI3)
HC
(14)
NOx
Total Emissions
'"TTST
Eno.*
C16)
Part.
343
369
712
(17)
sox
0
26
26
(18)
CO
0
298
298
(19)
HC
(20)
NOX
A. County _
B. Subarea
C. Year '
D. Allocation Order
Fulton
1980
Table 3.4-4
Industrial Point and New Source^Process Emissions - Subarea Summary
Industrial
Process Catecorv
ur
14 5 32
E. SUBAREA TOTAL
Point Source Emissions
NoPof
Sources
1
(3)
Emp.*
(4)
Part.
2
2
(S)
sox
0
0
(6)
CO
0
0
(7)
HC
(8)
NOX
New Source Emissions
$)
Emp.*
(10)
Part.
0
0
(11)
sox
0
0
(12)
CO
0
0
(13)
HC
(14)
NOx
Total Emissions
~[is5
Enp.*
(16)
Part.
2
2
(17)
SOx
0
0
(18)
CO
0
0
(19)
HC
(20)
NOx
•Employment
-------
to
o
Table 3.4-1
Point Source Industrial Process Emissions
A. County
B. Year
Pulton
1985
C. Allocation Order
Indust.
Proc.Cat.
(1)
20
20
20
20
Source Identification
(2)
Name
Zoffee Co,
Food Preparation
Brewing Co.
Handle Co.
OOUNTY TOTAL
(3)
Process
209S
2099
2082
2094
(4)
Subarea
10
10
13
12
Coord. (5)
X
J742.4
742.3
742.7
738.9
Y
3737.3
3739.2
3726.2
3741.9
N
Process Bnission Forecast (tons/yr)
(6)
GF**
1.334
1.334
1.334
1.334
Part. (7)
Cont.
finis.
1
28
3
6
38
so, m
Cont.
Bids.
0
13
25
0
38
CO (9)
Cont.
Emis.
0
0
0
0
0
HC (101
Cont.
Emis.
HO, fill
Cont.
finis.
(12)
Em>.*
Table 3.4-1
Point Source Industrial Process Bnissions
A. County
B. Year ~
C. Allocation Order
Pulton
T5IT
Indust.
Proc.Cat.
UJ
26
26
Source Identification
(£)
Name
Paper Bag Co.
Paper Coating G
COUNTY TOTAL
l-SJ
Process
2643
2641
I'J
Subarea
13
12
Loom, ibj
741.5
739.4
3736.5
3739.0
Process Bnission Forecast (tons/yr)
TB)
GF*«
2.108
2.108
Fart. (/)
Cont.
•
Bids.
0
2
2
SUx 18J
Cont.
Emis.
0
2
2
uu i»j
Cont.
Emis.
0
0
0
HC 110J
Cont.
Emis.
NUx (11)
Cont.
Emis.
(1ZJ
E«p.*
A. County
B. Year
Fulton
_
C. Allocation uroer
Table 3.4-1
Point Source Industrial Process Emissions
Indust.
Proc.Cat.
(1)
28
28
Source Identification
(2)
Name
Inorganic
Pigment Co.
Paint Co.
COUNTY TOTAL
(3)
*roccss
2816
2851
(4)
3ub3T6
-------
Table.3.4-1
Point Source Industrial Process Emissions
A. County
B. Year
Fulton
1985
C. Allocation Order
Indust.
Proc.Cat.
(1)
29
29
29
23
Source Identification
(2)
Name
Paving Co.
Paving Co.
Paving Co.
Paving Co.
COUNTY TOTAL
(3)
Process
2951
2951
2951
2951
(4)
jubarea
12
12
15
15
Coord. (51
X
740.8
734.6
738.0
735.7
Y
3739.1
3740.8
3728.0
3724.7
(6)
GF**
2.387
2.387
2.387
2.387
Process Emission Forecast (tons/yr)
Part. (71
Cont.
Emis.
75
4
5
112
196
SO* (81
Contx
Emis.
0
0
0
2
2
CO (91
Cant.
Emis.
0
0
0
0
0
ty! (101
Cont.
Emis.
NOv fill
Cont.
Emis.
(12)
Emo.*
,
Table 3.4-1
Point Source Industrial Process Emissions
A. County
B. Year
Fulton
1985
C. Allocation Order 3
Indust.
Proc.Cat.
UJ
33
33
33
33
Source Identification
UJ
Name
Steel Works Co.
Iron Foundry
Steel Works Co.
Sec. Smelt. Co.
COUNTY TOTAL
i->;
Process
3312
3321
3312
3341
l»J
subarea
11
11
11
12
Loora. (bj
741.9
744.9
741.0
739.2
3742.1
3738.6
3741.9
3740.5
Process Emission Forecast (tons/yr)
W
GF**
1.590
1.590
1.590
1.59D
rait, i/j
!'Coht.
Emis.
5478
57
479
7
6021
SOx 18J
Cont.
Emis.
46
2
0
364
412
ID l»J
Cont.
Ends.
4865
3496
4865
0
13226
HL 11UJ
Cont.
Emis.
NOx (11)
Sont.
Emis.
UZJ
Emp.*
Table 3.4-1
Point Source Industrial Process Emissions
A. Count;
B. Year
f Fulton
1985
t. Allocation uroer 3
Indust.
Proc.Cat.
(1)
36
Source Identification
(2)
Name
Electric
Machinery Co.
COUNTY TOTAL
(3)
Process
3696
(4)
Bubarea
16
Coord fSl
X
727. S
Y
3714.8
Process Emission Forecast (tons/yr)
(6)
GF**
2.436
Part f71
Cont.
Emis.
316
316
-------
hihle 3.4-1
Point Source Industrial Process Ijnissions
A. County
B. Year
C.
Fulton
1985
Allocation Order
Indust.
Proc. Cat
CD
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
14
Source Identification
(?)
Name
Brick Co.
Redi-Mix Concre
•Redi-Mix Concre'
Redi-Mix Concre
Glass Ctr. Co.
Mineral Wool Co
Redi-Mix Concre'
Redi-Mix Concre'
Redi-Mix Concre
Redi-Mix Concre'
Redi-Mix Concre
Flat Glass Co.
Redi-Mix Concrel
Redi-Mix Concret
Redi-Mix Concrel
Crushed Granite
COUNTY TOTAL
t3)
'rocess
3251
e 3273
e 3273
e 3273
3221
3296
e 3273
e 3273
e 3273
e 3273
e 3273
3211
e 3273
e 3273
e 3273
1423
1 (4)
>ubarea
12
10
11
11
15
16
16
11
IS
11
11
15
15
17
13
12
Chord. (5)
X
731.4
742.4
740.8
743.8
739.3
727.5
725.6
745.4
731.8
745. 5
745.5
739.3
735.7
743.5
741.3
736.9
Y
3744.4
3738.7
3740.1
3741.1
3728.7
3714.8
3716.6
3739.9
3726.0
3737.4
3737.4
3727.8
3725.1
3745.1
3733.3
3741.2
Process (.mission forecast (tons/yr)
(6)
GP**
1.934
1.934
1.934
1.934
1.934
1.934
1.934
1.934
1.934
1.934
1.934
1.934
1.934
1.934
1.934
1.934
Part. (7)
Cont.
linis.
5792
4
6
2
324
260
1
2
4
4
IS
613
4
2
2
238
7273
SOx (8)
font .
Ijnis.
0
0
0
0
351
0
0
0
0
0
0
357
0
0
0
0
708
CO (9)
Cont .
Ends.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
HC
Cont.
10)
Emis .
NOX (11)
Cont.
Emis.
s
(12)
onp.
*Employment
**Growth Factor
-------
Cri
Fulton
Table 3.4-1
Point Source Industrial Process Emissions
A. County
B. Year
C. Allocation Order
1985
Indus t.
Prqc.Cat.
(1)
49
49
49
49
Source Identification
(2)
Name
Refuse Systems
U.S. Prison
Steam Supply
Steam Supply
COUNTY TOTAL
(3)
Process
4953
4953
4961
4961
(4)
aubarea
14
13
12
10
Coord. (5)
X
743.8
740.5
742.1
Y
3733.1
3736.6
3737.3
Process Emission Forecast (tons/yr)
(6)
GF**
1.828
1.828
1.828
1.828
Part. f71
Cont.
finis.
0
17
3557
2111
5685
SO* f81
Cont.
Emis.
0
2
881
1612
2495
CO f91
Cont.
Emis.
2
27
15
29
73
HC flOl
Cont.
Emis.
N°* fill
Cont.
Emis.
(12)
Emp.*
Table 3.4-1
Point Source Industrial Process Emissions
A. County
B. Year
Fulton
1985
C. Allocation Order
Indust.
Proc.Cat.
lij
91
(Civil)
Source Identification
" '(fj
Name
U.S. Prison
COUNTY TOTAL
l-SJ
Process
9100
(4)
aubarea
13
Loora. (ij
743.8
3733.1
Process Emission Forecast (tons/yr)
"15]
GF**
2.138
Fart. (7)
Cont.
Emis.
13
13
SUv IBJ
Cont.
Emis.
0
0
ID 19J
Cont.
Emis.
13
13
HL UOJ
Cont.
Emis.
NUx U1J
Cont.
Emis.
(.it)
Emp.*
Table 3.4-1
Point Source Industrial Process Emissions
A. County Fulton
B. Year
1985
C. Allocation urder T.
uidust.
Proc.Cat.
(1)
91
91
Source Identification
(21
Name
Aimed Forces
Armed Forces
COUNTY TOTAL
(3)
Process
9100
9100
(4)
Subarea
11
14
Coord.
X
744.3
737.8
fSl
Y
3737.2
3732.2
Process Emission Forecast
(6)
GF**
1.0
1.0
J>art f71
Cont.
Bnis.
0
2
2
sn» f«l
Cant
Emis
0
2
2
ro roi
Cont
Emis.
0
2
2
(tons/yr)
w. nni
Cont
Emis
MV cm
Cont
Pmjc
(12)
Enm *
•Employment
••Growth Factor
-------
Industrial Point :mJ - Ijiu-csions In Pixxei- Uitcj.-or
A. County Fulton
B. Year 1985
C. Allocation Order
(1)
Industrial
Process Category
20
26
28
29
14 & 32
33
36
49
91 (Civilian)
91 (Armed)
D. COltm TOTAL
Rase 1 me Year
Lvistuig Point Sources
(2)
'art.
29
1
2528
92
4541
3788
202
3537
6
2
14726
(3)
29
1
1000
1
38"
IT
14
1471
0
2
3214
(4)
00
3
r
0
o
:
831?
163
42
6
2
8532
(5)
(h)
.*.»
forecast Year - .\l 1 Sources
OF"
1.334
2.108
2.33.1
2.38"
1.934
1.3-3
2.436
1.828
2.138
0.982
W//,
Part,
39
2
;i:4
221
(.781
5322
492
6464
13
2
2718
(in)
39
2
:o3:
2
748
491
34
2688
0
2
11,
ro
3
0
o
j
0
13226
397
7?
13
2
I'-IS
(12)
IIC
(13)
(Ul
IJH-?
lio recast Year
! \ls1lrit: Point Sources
(ISl
•art.
38
2
S1S4
!'f
7273
6021
316
5685
13
2
;.,-„„
(H'J
TO
2
2039
2
708
412
22
2495
0
2
H-ii)
CO
0
3
.1
T
J
13?7<
255
7!
13
1
1356S
(18)
IK:
(19)
*>x
(20)
U|'-
Ibrecjst Year • New Sources
P;i it .
Cont .
IjIUS.
1
0
0
24
1S9C
1
176
779
0
0
248?
(--"I
SO
Cont.
l-jius.
1
0
0
0
40
79
12
193
0
0
325
(23)
00
Cont.
IjIUS.
0
0
B
0
C
0
142
1
0
0
146
(-'4)
IIC
Cont .
Hnus.
(25)
(Cont.
Bus.
(26)
Enn.*
1C
* Eoployment
••Growth Factor
-------
Table 3.4-3
Process Bnissions by Process Category and Suharea
A.
B.
C.
D.
County
Subarea
Year
Allocation
nuron
10
1985
Order
3
Industrial
Process Category
(D
20
14 § 32
49
H. SimARTA TOTAL
Total
limp.
(2)
Point
Source
Pmp.
(3)
-
New
Source
Iinp.
(4)
11AP*
(5)
New Source '-missions (tons/yr)
(6)
Part.
0
0
0
0
(7)
SOY
n
0
0
0
f81
m
0
0
r\
0
(9)
HC
(10)
N0y
AUoca.ion Proton -
Table 3.4-3
Process Rnissions by Process Category and Subarea
A. County
B. Subarea
C. Year
Fulton
D. Allocation Order
Industrial
Process Category
CD
28
14 § 32
33
91 (Armed)
E. SUBAREA TOTAL
Total
• fimp.
(2)
Source
ftnp.
(3)
Source
Rim.
(4)
IlAP*
(S)
New Source I'm iss ions (tons/yr)
(6)
Part.
0
0
0
0
0
f7)
sr>*
0
0
0
0
0
rs>
m
0
0
0
0
0
(9)
HC
(10)
N^x
'Bnployment Allocation Proportion Subarea Category New SourceRnployment
' l Total Category New Source Rnployment
195
-------
Table 3.4-3
Process FMssions by Process Category and Suharea
A. County
B. Suharea
C. Year
Fulton
12
1985
P. Allocation Order
Industrial
Process Category
0)
20
26
29
14 6 32
33
49
!•:. SIFBARRA TOTAL
Total
'$'
Point
Source
limp.
(3)
New
Source
ftnp.
(4)
FAP*
(5)
New Source limissions (tons/yr) -
(6)
Part.
1
0
17
1318
1
778
2115
(?)
sn¥
0
0
0
1
7"
1°3
272
(8)
m
0
3
0
3
0
3
3
m
IIC
nn)
N(\
•n*l*«t AHoc.tion Proportion
Table
Process IMssions by Process Category and Subarea
A. County
B. Subarea"
C. Year
Fulton
13
1985
D. Allocation order
Industrial
Process Category
W
20
26
14 § 32
49
91 CCivil)
E. SUBAREA TOTAL
Total
Rmp.
(2)
Source
Bnp.
f3)
Source
Rnp.
C4)
RAP*
f5)
New Source Rnissions (tons/yr)
fft)
Part.
0
0
0
1
0
1
m
sn»
1
0
0
0
0
1
fB)
CO
0
0
0
1
0
1
(9)
IK:
flO)
NO,
„„ . . ... .. „ »< Subarea Category New Source Employment
"Bnployment Allocation Proportion - Tbtal Category New Source Rnployment
196
-------
Table 3.4-3
lYocess ftnissions by Process Category ami Suharea
A.
B.
C.
n.
County
Subarea
Year
Al location
Fulton
14
1985
Order
X" '
Industrial
Process Category
CD
49
91 (Am»d)
!•. SlfBARIiA TOTAL
Total
Hup.
(2)
Point
Source
limp.
(3)
New
Source
Hip.
(4)
HAP*
(5)
New Source linissions (tons/yr)
(6)
Part.
0
0
0
n
.sn¥
0
0
0
(8)
on
A
0
0
(9)
UT
no)
NO,
Table 3.4-3
Process Hnissions by Process Category and Subarea
A. County
B. Suharea"
C. Year
Fulton
15
1985
D. Allocation Order
Industrial
Process Category
fl)
28
29
14 § 32
(•:. Sl/BAIUiA TOTAL
Total
limp.
(2)
Source
Finp.
m
Source
Bm.
(4)
I1AP*
f5)
New Source Ihiissions (tons/yr)
ffi)
Part.
0
7
53
60
(7)
SDy
0
0
40
40
(8)
<:o
0
0
0
0
(9)
lie
(10)
NO*
•Employment Allocation Proportion
Subarea Category New Source ntoployment
Total Category New Source Rnployment
197
-------
Table 3.4-3
Process Bnissions hy Process Category and Suharea
\. County
B. Subarea
C. Year
D. Allocation Order
Fulton
1985
Industrial
Process Category
0)
14 5 32
36
i:. sim.\Ri:A TOTAI.
Total
linp.
(2)
Point
Source
Fmp.
CS)
New
Source
Imp.
(4)
FAP*
CS)
New Source finissions (tons/yr)
(6)
Part.
145
176
•
321
(7)
sn¥
0
12
12
(8)
CO
0
142
142
(9)
HC
(10) j
NO*
*!inplovmcnt Allocation Proportion ;uharea Category New Source
1 • ' Total Category Neu Source b
Category New .Source Ironloyment
Table 3.4-3
Process IMssions by Process Category and Subarea
\. County
Fulton
17
B. Subarea
C. Year
D. Allocation Order
1975
Industrial
Process Category
fl)
14 5 32
E. SUBAREA TOTAL
Total
Fimp.
(2)
Source
Imp.
(3)
Source
•, Frnp.
i(4)
1
'
1-AP*
(5)
New Source linissions (tons/yr)
(6)
Part.
0
0
(?)
SOy
•\
J
0
H)
m
0
0
(9)
HC
(10)
NO*
*c™ i „«. Aii^,*-«« D^^T-*4«n
*Bnployment Allocation Proportion
Subarea Category New Source Employment
total Category New Source ftitployment
198
-------
ill for.
A. County
B. Subarea~~ 10 ~;
C. Year 1985
D. Allocation Order
Table 3.4-4
Industrial Point and Neu Source Process Inissions - .Subarea Summary
Industrial
Process Category
Tu
20
14 a 32
49
E. SUBAREA TOTAL
,, (2),
No. of
Sources
2
1
1
Point Source Ijnissions
(3J
limp.*
l*T
Part.
29
4
2111
2144
15)
sox
13
0
1612
1625
16)
CO
0
0
29
29
(7)
1C
(8)
NO*
New Source i Emissions
(9)
Imp.*
(10)
Part.
0
0
0
0
(UJ
SOX
0
0
0
0
(12)
CO
0
0
0
0
(13)
HC
(14)
MOX
Total Emissions
(15)
Emi>.*
(16)
Part.
29
4
2111
2114
(17)
sox
13
0
1612
1625
(185
CO
0
0
29
29
(IS)
HC
(25T
NOX
IO
<£>
Table 3.4-4
Industrial Point and New Source Process Emissions - Subarea Summary
A.
B.
C.
D.
County
Subarea
Year
Allocation
Fulton
11
1985
Order
3
Industrial
Process Cateeorv
UJ
28
14 5 32
33
91 (Armed)
E. SUBAREA TOTAL
Point Source Lmissions
NofZof
Sources
1
5
3
1
(3)
Blip.*
(4)
Part.
5152
29
6014
0
.1195
f5)
sox
2039
0
48
0
2087
(6)
CO
0
0
13226
0
13226
C?)
HC
(8)
»x
New Source Emissions
$)
Emp.
(10)
Part.
0
0
0
0
0
(11)
sox
0
0
0
0
0
(12)
CO
0
0
0
0
0
(13)
HC
(14)
NOx
Total Emissions
fl$)
Emp.*
(16)
Part.
5152
29
6014
0
11195
(17)
SOx
2039
0
48
0
2087
(18)
CO
0
0
13226
0
13226
(19)
HC
(20)
NOx
*Employment
-------
A. County
B. Subarea'
C. Year
Fulton
Table 3.4-4
Industrial Point and New Source Process Emissions - Subarea Summary
1985
D. Allocation Order
Industrial
Process Category
(l)
20
26
29
14 § 32
33
49
E. SUBAREA TOTAL
Point Source Emissions
., (z).
No. of
Sources
1
1
2
2
1
1
13J
Emp.*
i« ;
Part.
6
2
79
6030
7
3557
9681
(5J
SOX
0
2
0
0
364
881
1247
(6)
CO
0
0
0
0
0
15
15
(7)
HC
(8)
NOx
New Source Emissions
(9)
Enp.
(10J
Part.
1
0
17
1318
1
778
2115
(H)
SOX
0
0
0
0
79
193
272
(I?)
CO
0
0
0
0
0
3
3
(13)
HC
(14)
NOx
Total Emissions
(1ST
Enro.*
(16)
Part.
7
2
96
7348
8
4335
11796
(17)
sox
0
2
0
0
443
1074
1519
(18)
CO
0
0
0
0
0
18
18
(19)
HC
(20)
NOX
O
O
A. County
B. Subarea"
C. Year
Fulton
1985
D. Allocation .Order.
Table 3.4-4
Industrial Point and New Source Process Emissions - Subarea Summary
Industrial
Process Caterorv
ur
20
26
14 a 32
49
91 (Civil)
E. SUBAREA TOTAL
Point Source Emissions
No.(Zof
Sources
1
1
1
1
1
(3)
Emp.*
(4)
Part.
3
0
2
17
13
35
(5)
SO*
25
0
0
2
0
27
(6)
CO
0
0
0
27
13
40
(7)
HC
(8)
NOx
New Source Emissions
(9)
Emp.*
(10)
Part.
0
0
0
1
0
1
(11)
sox
1
0
0
0
0
1
(12)
CO
0
0
0
1
0
1
(13)
HC
(14)
NOx
Total Emissions
Tis)
Emp.*
(16)
Part.
3
0
2
18
13
36
(17)
SOX
26
0
0
2
0
28
(18)
CO
0
0
0
28
13
41
(19)
HC
(20)
NOx
^Employment
-------
A. County
B. Subarea"
C. Year
Fulton
Table 3.4-4
Industrial Point and New Source Process Emissions - Subarea Summary
1985
D. Allocation Order
Industrial
Process Category
U)
49
91 (Armed)
E. SUBAREA TOTAL
Point Source Emissions
No.Uof
Sources
1
1
l-SJ
Emp.*
(*)
Part.
0
2
2
is;
sox
0
2
2
(6)
CO
2
2
4
(?)
HC
(8)
NOX
New Source Emissions
f9)
Emp.*
(10)
Part.
0
0
0
(11)
SOx
0
0
0
(12)
CO
0
0
0
(13)
HC
(14)
NOx
Total Emissions
(15)
Emu.*
(16)
Part.
0
2
2
(17)
sox
0
2
2
(18)
CO
2
2
4
(19)
HC
(20)
NOX
A. County Fulton
B. Subarea15 ~
C. Year 1985
D, Allocation Order
Table 3.4-4
Industrial Point and New Source Process Emissions - Subarea Summary
Industrial
Process Cateoorv
tir
28
29
14 § 32
E. SUBAREA TOTAL
Point Source Emissions
NofZof
Sources
1
2
4
(3)
Emp.*
(4)
Part.
2
117
937
1056
(S)
sox
0
2
708
710
(6)
CO
0
0
0
0
(7)
HC
(8)
N°x
New Source Emissions
($!>
Enrp.
(10)
Part.
0
7
53
60
(11)
sox
0
0
40
40
(12)
CO
0
0
0
0
(13)
HC
(14)
NOx
Total Emissions
7is)
I2np.«
(16)
Part.
2
124
990
1116
(17)
SOx
0
2
748
750
(18)
CO
0
0
0
0
(19)
HC
(20)
NOx
* Employment
-------
A. County
B. Subarea'
C. Year
Fulton
Table 3.4-4
Industrial Point and New Source Process linissions - Subarea Summary
1585
D. Allocation Order
Industrial
Process Category
W
14 5 32
36
E. SUHAREA TOTAL
Point Source Emissions
., ro,
No. of
Sources
2
1
(*)
Emp.*
(*)
Part.
261
316
577
(5)
SOX
0
22
22
(6)
CO
0
255
255
(7)
HC
IS)
NOx
New Source Emissions
(S)
Emp.*
(10)
Part.
145
176
321
(11)
sox
0
12
12
(12}
CO
0
142
142
(13)
HC
(14)
NOX
Total Emissions
H5)
Emn.*
(16)
Part.
406
492
\
898
(17)
SOX
0
34
34
(18)
CO
0
397
397
(19)
HC
(20)
NOX
o
tsJ
A. County Fulton
B. Subarea 17
C. Year '
1985
D. Allocation Order
Table 3.4-4
Industrial Point and New Source Process Emissions - Subarea Summary
Industrial
Process Cateeorv
U)
14 5 32
E. SUBAREA TOTAL
Point Source Ijnissions
NoPof
Sources
1
(3)
Emp.*
(4)
Part.
2
2
(5)
sox
0
0
(6)
CO
0
0
(7)
HC
(8)
NOx
New Source Emissions
(9)
Emp.*
(10)
Part.
0
0
(11)
sox
0
0
(12)
CO
0
0
(13)
HC
(14)
NOx
Total Emissions
Tis)
&np.*
(16)
Part.
2
2
(17)
SOX
0
0
(18)
CO
0
0
(19)
HC
(20)
NOx
*Lmployment
-------
Allocation
Procedure
Order 1:
Sequence of Tables
3.4-5
3.4-7
3.4-5a
3.4-7a
3.4-8
Orders 2 and 3:
3.4-6
3.4-7
3.4-5a
3.4-7a
3.4-8
Fig. 3.4-2 Industrial Fuel Combustion Allocation Table Sequence
-------
A. County Fulton
B. Year 1970
C. Allocation Order
Table 3.4-5
Industrial Point Source Fuel Use
(1)
Industrial
Proc. f^t,
32
32
Source Identification
(2)
Name-
Mineral Wool Co.
Mineral Wool Co.
OXWTY TOTAL
(3)
Proc.
3296
3296
(4)
16
16
Coord. (5)
X
Y
Fuel Demand and Fuel Use Forecast
G$
1.0
1.0
(7)
MBTU
1071
400
X71
(8)
Enq).'
(9)
COAL
(10)
IS
(11)
IA
(U)
I OIL
(13)
tS
,(14)
D nu
(IS)
IS
(16)
NC
1020
1020
2040
(17)
> GAS
(18)
LPG
(19)
COKE
(20)
V.DOD
(21)
I-ASSE
(22)
DIES
(23)
GAS
A. County Fulton
B. Year I57B
Table 3.4-S
Industrial Point Source Fuel Use
C. Allocation Order
(1)
Industrial
Proc. Cat.
33
33
Source Identification
(ZJ
Name
Steel Works Co.
Steel Works Co.
COUNTY TOTAL
(3)
Proc.
3312
3312
(4)
11
11
Coord. (S)
X
Y
Fuel Demand and Fuel Use Forecast
(6)
r,f**
1.0
1.0
(7)
MBTU
54
430
484
(8)
JTIp.
(9)
COAL
(10)
IS
(11)
tA
(12)
I OIL
360
360
(13)
ts
1
1
(14)
) OIL
(15)
IS
(16)
NG
430
430
(17)
f GA5
(18)
LPG
(19)
COKE
(20)
HOOD
(21)
HkSSE
(22)
>IES
(23)
GAS
Table 3.4-S
Industrial Point Source Fuel Use
Fulton
A. County
B. Year 1970
C. Allocation Order
(1)
Industrial
Proc. Cat.
49
49
Source Identification
(20
Name
Steam Supply
Steam Supply
(3)
Proc.
4961
4961
(4)
12
10
Coord. (5)
X
Y
Fuel Demand and Fuel Use Forecast
(6)
IF**
1.0
1.0
(')
MBTU
4566
7356
l«)
2mp.*
(9)
COAL
198§(
2942;
(10J
ts
1.48
l.SO
111)
tA
12
8,2
112)
R Oil
(13)
ts
(14)
)OIL
(IS)
ts
(16)
NG
(17)
? GAS
(18)
LPG
(19)
COKE
(20)
MOOD
(21)
BASSE
(22)
DIES
(23)
GAS
'Employment
**Growth Factor
-------
A. Gointy
B. Year
C.
Fulton
Table 3.4-S
Industrial Point Source Fuel Use
I971T
Allocation Order
(1)
Industrial
PrfiTir Tfl^i
91
(Civil)
Source Identification
(2)
Name
U. S, Prison
COUNTY TOTAL
(3)
Proc.
9100
(4)
13
Coord. (5)
X
Y
Fuel Demand and Fuel Use Forecast
(6)
br**
1.0
1.0
(7)
MBTU
580
580
(8)
Bnp.«
(9)
COAL
(10)
IS
(11)
*A
(12)
»OIL
(13)
ts
(14)
3 OIL
(IS)
ts
(16)
NG
580
580
(17)
P GAS
(18)
LPG
(19)
COME
(20)
WOOD
(21)
3-ASSE
(22)
DIES
(23)
GAS
*Bnployment
**Growth Factor
to
o
en
-------
laMe 3.4-5a (Cent, of 5.4-5)
Industrial Point Source luel Combustion 1'jnissions
A. County Fulton
b. iear 1970
L. Allocation Order 3
Industrial
Proc. Cat.
(1)
32
32
COUNTY TOTAL
Source Identification
(2)
Name
Mineral Wool Co.
Mineral Wool Co.
(3)
Process
3296
3296
(•))
Subarea
16
16
Coord. (5)
X
Y
Fuel Combustion Kmissions Forecast (tons/yr)
Part. (6)
Cont.
!-jnis.
9
18
SO, (7)
Cont .
Finis.
1
1
2
CO (8)
Cont.
Lmis.
9
9
18
HC (9)
Cont.
Emis.
NOx
Cont.
(10)
Emis.
Table 3.4-5a (Cont. of 3.4-5)
Industrial Point Source Fuel Combustion Emissions
A. County
B. Year
Fulton
197TT
C. Allocation Order 3
Industrial
Proc. Cat.
(1)
33
33
COUNTY TOTAL
Source Identification
(2)
Name
Steel Works Co.
Steel Works Co.
(3)
Process
3312
3312
(4)
Subarea
11
11
Coord. (5)
X
Y
Fuel Combustion Emissions Forecast (tons/yr)
Part. (6)
Cont.
Emis.
4
4
8
SOX (7)
Cont
En is
28
1
29
CO (8)
Cont.
Emis.
1
4
5
HC (9)
Cont.
Emis.
NOx (10)
Cont.
Emis.
K)
O
Table 3.4-Sa (Cont. of 3.4-S)
Industrial Point Source Fuel Combustion remissions
A. County
B- Year .
C. Allocation Order
Fulton
1970
Industrial
Proc. Cat.
(1)
49
49
COUNTY TOTAL
Source Identification
(Z)
Name
Steam Supply Co.
Steam Supply Co.
(3)
Process
4961
4961
(4)
Subarea
12
10
Coord. (5)
X
Y
Fuel Combustion Emissions Forecast (tons/yr)
Part . (6)
Cont.
Fjnis.
1906
1930
3836
SOx (7)
Cont.
Fjnis.
558
839
1397
CO (8)
Cont.
Emis.
10
15
25
HC (9)
Cont.
Emis.
NOX (10)
Cont.
Emis.
-------
A. County Fulton
B. Year 1970
C. Allocation Order
Table 3.4-5a (Cont. of 3.4-5)
Industrial Point Source Fuel Combustion Emissions
Industrial
Proc. Cat.
(1)
91 (Civil)
COUNTY TOTAL
Source Identification
(2)
Name
U. S. Prison
(3)
Process
9100
(4)
Subarea
13
Coord. (S)
X
Y
Fuel Combustion Emissions Forecast (tons/yr)
Part. (6)
Cont.
Emis.
5
5
SOX (7)
Cont.
Emis.
1
1
CO (8)
Cont.
Emis.
5
5
HC (9)
Cont.
Emis.
NOx (10)
Cont.
Emis.
to
o
-------
A. County Fulton
B. Year 1970
C. Mlocation Order
Table 3.4-6
Industrial Point and New Source liner^y Demand by Process Category
NJ
O
oo
Industrial
Process Category
(n
32
33
49
91
Power Generation
Industrial Area
D. COUNTY TOT.A1.
Baseline Year
ILxisting Point Sources
(2)
JBTU
1471
484
11922
580
14457
w
llm]).*
Forecast Year - All Sources
(4)
c;i:**
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
w///,
(5)
flBTU
f6)
Trip.*
Forecast Year ,
foist inp. Point Sources
(?)
MBTU
1471
484
11922
580
WM
14457
(8)
Emp.*
W///S
Forecast Year
New Sources
(9)
*IBTU
0
0
0
0
W///
0
fin)
finp.*
W///.
*lirn>lo>T!ient
**Growth lactor
-------
N)
O
A. County _
B. Subarea 10
C. Year
Fulton
Table 5.4-"
Industrial \c\% Source lucl Use By Process Category and Subarea
1970
U. Allocation Order
Industrial
Process Category
(1)
49
Power
Generation
Industrial
Area
i:. SUBARhA TOTAL
Total
Ijnp.*
(2)
I'oint
Source
limp. *
(3)
^sew
Source
limp.*
(4)
LAP**
(5)
Fuel Demand and I'uel Use Forecast
(M
^ffiTU
0
0
(")
COAL
0
0
(8)
*s
('.">
t\
(10)
:< OIL
(ii)
•.s
(12)
n OIL
(13)
vs
(14)
NT,
(IS)
r CAS
(16)
LPC
(17)
COKE
(18)
WOOD
(19)
3-ASSE
(20)
DIES
(21)
GAS
A. Count)*
B. Subarea"
C. Year
Fulton
Table 3.4-7
Industrial N'eu Source Fuel Use by Process Category' and Subarea
11
D. Allocation
.1970
Order
Industrial
Process Category
U)
33
Power
(ienerat ion
Industrial
Arpn
i.. SUBARLA TOTAL
Total
Ijnp.*
(2)
P"int
Source
|jnp.*
(3)
Nc\\
Source
Ijiqi.*
(4)
b\r**
(5)
Fuel Danand and Fuel Use Forecast
(6)
MBTIJ
0
0
(7)
COAL
(8)
IS
(9)
IA
(10)
R OIL
0
0
(11)
ts
(12)
D OIL
(13)
ts
(14)
NG
0
0
(15)
P GAS
(16)
LPC
(17)
COKE
(18)
WOOD
(19)
B-ASSE
(20)
DIES
(21)
CAS
Table 3.4-"
\. County Ful&on»«>
B. Subarea 12
L. U-ar 1970 — -
U. Allocation Order
Industrial
Process Categorv
(D
49
Power
Generation
Industrial
\rea
I.. SUB/\RJ.A TOT.-M.
Total
l.mp.*
I2l
3
Point
Source
IJT1>.*
(51
New
Source
Imp.*
14)
LM1**
(Si
Fuel Demand and Fuel Use Forecast
IDI
MBTU
0
0
C)
COAL
0
0
(8)
'.S
(9)
U
(101
R OIL
111)
vs
(12)
1) OIL
(13)
ts
(14)
N<;
(15)
P GAS
(16)
LPG
(17)
COKE
(18)
WOOD
(19)
B-ASSE
(20)
DIES
(21)
GAS
Umploynent
**l.mployroent Allocation I'roport i
Subaroa i atc-^nn
Tot a 1 ratcvjon
Source Ijiij'loyp'o
cmrcc |jiiplo\T'ent
lln.s \alue may be obtained from Table 3.4-3.
-------
Fulton
A. County
h. Subarea"
C. Year 1970
Table 3.4-"
Industrial New Source luel Use By Process Category and Subareu
U. Allocation Order
Industrial
Process Categorr
11)
91 (Civil)
Power
Cienerat ion
Industrial
Area
1 . SUBARIiA TOTAL
Total
Ijrip. *
C)
1'omt
Source
Ijiip. *
1?)
.NCU
Source
Ijnp.*
(4)
L\P**
(5)
fuel Demand and luel Use Forecast
("
'DVTU
0
0
C)
cn.\L
18)
IS
(9)
«,\
(10)
11 OIL
(ID
IS
(12)
n OIL
(13)
°s
(14)
NC
0
0
(IS)
P CAS
(16)
LIT;
(IV)
row:
(18)
WOOD
(IP)
B-ASSE
(20)
DIES
UD
GAS
A. County
B. Subarea
C.
Fulton
Table 3.4-7
Industrial Neu Source Fuel Use by Process Category and Subarea
16
1970
I). Allocation Order
Industrial
Process Category
(1)
32
Power
Generat ion
Industrial
Aroa
L. SUBAREA TOTAL
Total
Ijnp. *
(2)
Point
Source
1'jnp. *
(3)
Xew
Source
IjTlp.*
(4)
|j\T**
(S)
luel Demand and Puel Use Forecast
(0)
MBTI:
0
0
(7)
COAL
(8)
IS
(«)
IA
(10)
R OIL
(11)
IS
(12)
n OIL
(13)
IS
(14)
NX;
c
0
(15)
P (AS
(16)
LPC
(17)
COKE
(18)
WOOD
(19)
B-ASSE
(20)
DIF-S
(21)
GAS
*
**i
uiocation
Ta"le
-------
Table 3.4-7a (Cont. of 3.4-7)
Industrial New Source Fuel Combustion Emissions by Process Category and Subarea
A.
B.
C.
D.
County Fulton
Subarea 10
Year 1970
Allocation Order
3
Industrial
Process Category
(D
49
Power Generation
Industrial Area
L. COUNTY TOTAL
New Source Emissions (tons/yr)
Part. (2)
Controls
Ends.
0
0
SOx (3)
Controls
Ends.
0
0
CO (4)
Controls
Emis.
0
0
HC (5)
Controls
Emis.
NOx
Controls
(6)
Emis.
A.
B.
C.
I).
County
Suharca
Year
Table 3.4-7A (Cont. of 3.4-7)
Industrial New Source Fuel Combustion (Emissions by Process Category and Subarea
Fulton
11
1970
Al 1 ocation Order
Industrial
Process Category
(D
33
Power Generation
Industrial Area
):. QXWTY TOTAL
New Source Emissions (tons/yr)
Part. (2)
Controls
F.mis.
0
0
SOx (3)
Ixintrols
Fjnis.
0
0
CO (4)
Controls
Hmis.
0
0
HC (5)
Controls
limis.
NOX (6)
Controls
linis.
Table 3.4-7A (Cont. of 3.4-7)
Industrial New Source Fuel Combustion Emissions by Process Category and Suharea
A.
B.
C.
D.
County
Subarea
Year
Al locat ion
Fulton
12
1970
Order
3
Industrial
Process Category
(1)
49
Power Generation
Industrial Area
E. COUNTY TOTAL
New Source Emissions (tons/yr)
Part. (2)
Controls
Emis.
0
0
SOx (3)
Controls
Emis.
0
0
CO (4)
"ontrols
Emis.
0
0
HC (S)
Controls
Hmis.
NOx (b)
Controls
l-jni s .
*When following an Order 1 allocation procedure, only the "Industrial Area" row of this table will be used.
211
-------
A. County
B, Subarea"
C. Vear
Table 3.4-7a ICont. of 3.4-7)
Industrial New Source Fuel Combustion Ijnissions by Process Category and Subarea
Fulton
13
1970
Allocation Order
Industrial
Process Category
ID
91 (Civil)
Power Generation
Industrial Area
I;. IHUNTY TOTAL
New Source liiussions (tons/yr)
Part. (2)
Cont rols
I'JIIJS.
0
0
SOx 13)
Controls
Ijiiis.
0
0
CO (4)
(iint rols
Uiis.
0
0
IIC (5)
Cont rol s
I'mi.s.
NO* IM
Cont rols
Ijiiis.
A. County
B. Subarea
C. Year
•lablo 3.4-7A ICont. of 3.4-7)
Industrial New Source Fuel Combustion (.missions by Process Category and Subnrea
Pulton
16
1970
Allocation OrJer
Industrial
Process Category
(D
32
Power Generation
Industrial Area
I.. COUNTY TOTAL
New Source lircissions (tons/yr)
Part. (2)
Controls
pjitis.
0
0
S»» (3)
[Controls
Timis.
0
0
CD (4)
Controls
FJIUS.
0
0
IIC (5)
Controls
limis.
NO, (h)
font rols
1 .III i S .
•When following an Order 1 allocation procedure, only the "Industrial Area" row of this table will be used.
212
-------
Table 3.4-8
A. County
B. Subarea
C. Year
D.
Fulton
Industrial Point and New Source Fuel Combustion Emissions - Subarea Suimary
lo
Allocation
1970
Subarea
(1)
49
COUNTY TOTAL
Point Source Emissions
.. (2K
No. of
Sources
1
(3)
Bap.*
(4)
Part.
1930
1930
(5)
SO,
839
839
(6)
00
15
15
(7)
HC
(8)
NO,
New Source Emissions
(9)
Imp.*
(10)
Part.
0
0
(11)
SOx
0
0
(12)
00
0
0
(13)
HC
(14)
NOx
Total Emissions
(IS)
Enp.*
(16)
Part.
1930
1930
(17)
SO,
839
839
(18)
00
15
15
(19)
HC
(20)
NOx
r-o
A. County
B. Subarea
c. Veer
Fulton
1970
D. Allocation Order
Table 3.4-8
Industrial Point and New Source Fuel Combustion Emissions - Subarea Stannary
Subarea
UJ
33
COUNTY TOTAL
Point Source Scissions
NO!ZO£
Sources
2
W
&p.«
(4)
Part.
8
8
(5)
SOx
29
29
Co)
CO
5
5
(7)
1C
(8)
»„
New Source Emissions
'f9)
fiap.*
(10)
Part.
0
0
ill)
*>x
0
0
(12)
CO
0
0
(13)
HC
(14)
*>x
Total Emissions
(15)
Enp.*
(16)
Part.
8
8
(17)
»x
29
29
(18)
CO
5
5
(19)
HC
(20)
»„
Table 3.4-8
Industrial Point and New Source Fuel Conbustion Enissions - Subarea Suonarv
A.
B.
C.
u.
Ooonty
Subarea
Year
Allocation
Fulton
12
1970
Order
3
Subarea
(D
49
COUNTY TOTAL
Point Source Emissions
*f=of
Sources
1
(3)
Enp.*
(4)
Part.
1906
1906
(5)
SO.
558
558
IfcJ
CO
10
10
(7)
It
(8)
NO,
Nev Source Emissions
(9)
hnp.*
(10)
Part.
0
0
(11)
sox
0
0
(12)
CO
0
0
(13)
HC
(14)
NiOx
Total Emissions
(15)
Emp.*
(16)
Part.
1906
1906
(17)
SOx
556
558
(18)
CO
10
10
(19)
HC
(20)
NO,
•tnployraent
-------
A. County _
B. Subarea
C. Year
Fulton
l.il.lc 3.4-8
Industrial I'oint and Nci% Source lucl Combustion Ijnissions - Suharea Summary
13
1970
L>. Allocation Order
Subarea
(1)
91 (Civil)
COUNTY TOTAL
Point Source Ijnissions
Nol'of
Sources
1
(3)
Lmp.*
(4)
Part.
5
S
(S)
sox
1
1
(b)
CO
5
S
HC
,(8)
New Source Ijnissions
Ijnp.*
(10)
Part.
0
0
(11)
so*
0
0
(12)
CO
0
0
(13)
HC
(14)
NO*
Total Emissions
(IS)
Emp.*
(16)
Part.
5
S
(17)
1
1
(18)
CO
5
5
(19)
HC
(20)
NOX
A. County
B. Subarea
C. Year "
L). Allocation Order
Fulton
•16
1970
Table 3.4-8
Industrial Point and New Source I-'uel Combustion Emissions - Subarea Summary
Subarea
U)
32
COUNTY TOTAL
Point Source Emissions
No^of
Sources
2
(-•>}
lanp.*
(4)
Part.
18
18
(S)
SO,
2
2
(6)
CO
18
18
C")
1 1C
(8)
»x
New Source Tjnissions
(9)
limp.*
n ni
Part'
0
0
(11)
soy
0
0
(12)
CO
0
0
(13)
HC
(14)
N!°X
Total Emissions
(IS)
Emp.*
(16)
Part.
18
18
(17)
^x
2
2
(18)
CO
18
18
(19)
HC
(20)
N°x
•I.mploymcnt
-------
N)
H*
tn
A. County
B. Year
Table 3.4-5
Industrial Point Source Fuel Use
Rilton
__
C. Allocation Order
(1)
Industrial
Prw- Pat-
91
Source Identification
(2)
Name
U. S. Prison
COUNTY TOTAL
(3)
Proc.
9100
(4)
Subare;
13
Coord. (5)
X
Y
Fuel Demand and Fuel Use Forecast
3<8
1.269
1.269
(7)
MBTU
736
736
(8)<
Bap.«
(9)
COAL
(10)
ts
(11)
U
(12)
I OIL
(13)
ts
(14)
D Oil
(15)
ts
(16)
NG
736
736
(17)
P GAS
(18)
LPQ
(19)
COKE
(20)
MXJD
(21)
J-ASSE
(22)
DIES
(23)
GAS
•Employment
**Growth Factor
-------
Tahlc 3.4-5a (Cont. of 5.4-5)
Industrial Point Source l;uel Combustion Ijnissions
A. County
B. Year
Fulton
C. Allocation Order
_ 1975
Order
Industrial
Proc. Cat.
0)
32
32
Source Identification
(2)
Name
Mineral Wool Company
Mineral Wool Conpany
COIWTY TOTAL
(3)
Process
3296
3296
(4)
Subarea
16
16
Coord. (S)
X
Y
Fuel Combustion Emissions Forecast (tons/yr)
Part, (b)
Cont.
fc
I-jnis.
9
9
18
SOX (7)
Cont .
linis.
1
1
2
CO (8)
Cont.
Emis.
9
9
18
HC (9)
Cont.
Emis.
NOx
Cont.
[10)
Emis.
Table 3.4-5a (Cont. of 3.4-5)
Industrial Point Source Fuel Combustion Emissions
Fulton
A. County
B. Year "
C. Allocation Order
1975
Industrial
Proc. Cat.
(1)
33
33
Source Identification
(2)
Name
Steel Works Company
Steel Works Company
COUNTY TOTAL
(3)
Process
3312
3312
(4)
Subarea
11
11
Coord. (S)
X
Y
Fuel Combustion Emissions Forecast (tons/yr)
Part. (6)
Cont.
Emis.
S
4
9
SOX (7)
Cont.
Emis.
32
1
33
CO (8)
Cont.
Emis.
1
5
6
HC (9)
Cont .
Emis.
NOX (10)
Cont.
Emis.
Table 3.4-5a (Cont. of 3.4-5)
Industrial Point Source Fuel Combustion Emissions
A. County
B. Year
Fulton
1975
C. Allocation Order
Industrial
Proc. Cat.
(1)
49
49
Source I dent i f icat ion
(?)
Name
Steam Supply
Steam Supply
COUNTY TOTAL
(3)
Process
4961
4961
(4)
Subarea
12
10
Coord. (S)
X
Y
Fuel Combustion Emissions Forecast (tons/yr)
Pa" rt . (61)
Cont.
Ijnis.
1906
2324
4230
SO* (7)
Cont .
Emis.
558
1010
1568
CO (8)
Cont.
Emis.
10
18
28
HC (9)
Cont.
Emis.
NO, (10)
Cont.
Emis.
-------
Table 3.4-Sa (Cont. of 3.4-5)
Industrial Point Source Fuel Combustion linissions
Fulton
A. County _
». Year 1975
C. Allocation Order
Industrial
Proc. Cat.
(1) -
91 (Civil)
Source Identification
(2)
Name
U. S. Prison
COUNTY TOTAL
(3)
Process
9100
(4)
Subarea
13
Coord. (5)
X
Y
Fuel Combustion Emissions Forecast (tons/yr)
Part. (6)
Cont.
Emis.
6
6
aox (?)
Cont.
HB
Emis.
1
mm.
i "
CO (8)
Cont.
m
ac^su
Emis.
6
6
HC (9)
Cont.
Emis.
NOX (10)
Cont.
Emis.
Is)
-------
A. County Fulton
B. Year 1975
C. Allocation Order
Table
Industrial Point and New Source IJierR)' Demand by Process Category
fs)
H-»
CO
Industrial
Process Category
(1)
32
33
49
91
Power Generation
Industrial Area
D. COUNTY TOTAL
Basel me Year
Existing Point Sources
(2)
fffiTU
1471
484
11922
580
14457
(3)
limp. *
Forecast Year - All Sources
(4)
GF**
1.289
1.124
1.204
1.269
W///S
(S)
flBTU
1896
544
14354
736
17530
ff>)
Trip.*
Forecast Year
vxistinp Point Sources
n
NIBTU
1469
544
13145
714
W///,
15872
(81
IJnp.*
W///S
Forecast Year
New Sources
f'-'l
•IRTU
427
0
1209
22
W//,
1658
fin)
fimp.*
W/A
*Eq)loyment
**Growth Factor
-------
tsJ
t-+
IO
A. County
B. Subarea"
C. Year
Fulton
Table 3.4-7
Industrial New Source Fuel Use By Process Category and Subarea
10
1975
D. Allocation Order
Industrial
Process Category
(1)
49
Power
Generation
Industrial
Area
E. SUBAREA TOTAL
Total
Emp.*
(2)
Toint
Source
Emp.*
(3)
Source
Hup.*
(4)
EAP**
(5)
Fuel Demand and Fuel Use Forecast
(*)
MBTU
0
0
('•')
COAL
0
0
(8)
ts
(9)
t.A
(10)
R OIL
(11)
*S
(12)
D OIL
(13)
ts
(14)
NG
(15)
P GAS
(16)
LPG
(17)
COKE
(18)
WOOD
(19)
3-ASSE
(20)
DIES
t21)
GAS
A.
B.
C.
D.
County
Subarea
Year
Allocation
Fulton
11
1975
Order
3
Table 3.4-7
Industrial New Source Fuel Use by Process Category and Subarea
Industrial
Process Category
(D
33
Power
Generation
Industrial
ArAfl
E. SUBAREA TOTAL
Total
Emp.*
(2)
Jgoiot
Source
Emp.*
(3)
New
Source
Emp.*
(4)
EAP**
(5)
Fuel Demand and Fuel Use Forecast
(6)
MBTU
0
0
(V)
COAL
(8)
IS
(9)
tA
(10)
R OIL
0
0
(11)
ts
(12)
D OIL
(13)
ts
(14)
NG
0
0
(IS)
P GAS
(16)
LPG
(17)
COKE
(18)
WOOD
(19)
B-ASSE
(20)
DIES
(21)
GAS
•Employment
**Bnployraent Allocation Proportion
™» «"»
^ned ft- Table 3.4-3.
-------
ts)
r-o
o
A. County
B. Subarea 12
C. Year
Fulton
Table 3.4-7
Industrial New Source Fuel Use By Process Category and Subarea
1975
D. Allocation Order
Industrial
Process Category
(1)
49
Generation
Industrial
Area.
E. SUBAREA TOTAL
Total
Emp.*
(2)
Source
Pnni ft
Qnp»
(3)
New"
Source
Emp.*
(4)
EAP**
(5)
Fuel Demand and Fuel Use Forecast
(V
MBTU
1209
1209
(7)
COAL
4054
4054
(«)
IS
1.48
1.48
(9)
IA
12.0
12.0
(10)
R OIL
(11)
ts
(12)
D OIL
(13)
tS
(14)
NG
(15)
P GAS
(16)
LPC
an
COKE
(18)
WOOD
(19)
J-ftSSE
(20)
DIES
(21)
GAS
A. County _
B. Subarea"
C. Year
Fulton
Table 3.4-7
Industrial New Source Fuel Use by Process Category and Subarea
13
1975
D. Allocation Order
Industrial
Process Category
(D
91 (Civil)
Generation
Industrial
Arvtn
E. SUBAREA TOTAL
Total
Emp.«
(2)
Point
Source
Emp.*
(3)
New
Source
Emp.*
(4)
EAP**
(5)
Fuel Demand and Fuel Use Forecast
(6)
MBTU
22
22
(7)
COAL
(8)
tS
(9)
tA
(10)
R OIL
(11)
tS
(12)
DOIL
(13)
ts
(14)
NG
22
22
(15)
P GAS
(16)
LPG
(17)
COKE
(18)
WOOD
(19)
B-ASSE
(20)
DIES
(21)
GAS
Table 3.4-7
A. County Fulton
B. Subarea 16
C. Year 197S
D. Allocation Order
Industrial
Process Category
(D
32
Power
Generation
Industrial
Area
E. SUBAREA TOTAL
Total
Emp,*
(2)
3
Point
Source
Emp.*
(3)
inuusLnai new -DUUH.C ruei use uy i-rui-ess i.Hiegury ana ouuaiea
New
Source
Emp.*
(4)
EAP**
(S)
Fuel Demand and Fuel Use Forecast
(6)
MBTU
427
427
(7)
COAL
(8)
ts
(9)
tA
(10)
R OIL
(11)
ts
(12)
D OIL
(13)
ts
(14)
NG
592
592
(15)
P GAS
(16)
LPG
(17)
COKE
(18)
HOOD
(19)
B-ASSE
(20)
DIES
(21)
GAS
•Employment
••Employment Allocation Proportion
Subarea Category New Source Employment
Total Category New Source Employment
This value mav be obtained from Table 3.4-3.
-------
A. County
B. Subarea
C. Year
D. Allocation Order
Table 3.4-7a (Cont. of 3.4-7)
Industrial New Source Fuel Combustion Emissions by Process Category and Subarea
Pulton
1975
Industrial
Process Category
(D
49
Power Generation
Industrial Area
E. COUNTY TOTAL
New Source Emissions (tons/yr)
Bart. (2)
Controls
Ends.
0
0
SOX (3)
Controls
Ends.
0
0
CO (4)
Controls
Ends.
0
0
HC (5)
Controls
Ends.
NOx (6)
Controls
1-inis.
County _
Subarea"
Year
A.
B.
C.
D. Allocation Order
Table 3.4-7A (Cont. of 3.4-7)
Industrial New Source Fuel Combustion Fimissions by Process Category and Subarea
Pulton
)75
Industrial
Process Category
(D
33
Power Generation
Industrial Area
I:. COUNTY TOTAL
New Source Emissions (tons/yr)
Part. (2)
Controls
Rmis.
0
0
SOX (3)
Controls
Rmis.
0
0
CO (4)
Controls
Ends.
0
0
HC (5)
Controls
Rmis.
NOX (b)
Controls
Ijnis.
•When following an Order 1 allocation procedure, only the "Industrial Area" row of this table will be used.
221
-------
A. County
B. Subarea"
C. Year _
l>. Allocation Order
Table 3.4-7a (Cont. of 3.4-7)
Industrial New Source Fuel Combustion Emissions by Process Category and Subarea
Fulton
1975
Industrial
Process Category
(1)
49
Power Generation
Industrial Area
L. COUNTY TOTAL
New Source remissions (tons/yr)
Part. (2)
Controls
Kmis.
389
389
SOx (3)
Controls
Fjnis.
114
114
CO (4)
Controls
finis.
2
2
HC (S)
Controls ! Emis.
N0> (6)
Controls
limis.
A.
B.
C.
I).
County
Subarea"
Year
Table 3.4-7A (Cont. of 3.4-7)
Industrial New Source Fuel Combustion (missions by Process Category and Subarea
Fulton
13
Allocation
1975
Ordtr
Industrial
Process Category
(1)
91 (Civil)
Power Generation
Industrial Area
Ii. CXXINTY TOTAL
New Source Emissions (tons/yr)
Part. (2)
Controls
limis.
0
0
SOx (3)
Controls
Fmis.
0
0
CO (4)
Controls
Emis.
0
0
HC (S)
Controls
Finis.
NOX (t>)
Controls
limis.
A.
B.
C.
0.
County _
Subarea
Year 197T
Allocation Order
Table 3.4-7A (Cont. of 3.4-7)
Industrial New Source Fuel Combustion Kmissions by Process Category and Suharea
Fulton
16
Industrial
Process Category
(1)
32
Power Generation
Industrial Area
\L. COUNTY TOTAL
New Source Kmissions (tons/yr)
Part. (2)
Controls
Kmis.
5
5
SOx (3)
imtrols
Emis.
1
1
CO (4)
Controls
Emis.
5
5
HC (S)
Controls
Panis.
NOX (b)
Controls
l-lmis.
*When following an Order 1 allocation procedure, only the "Industrial Area" row of this table will be used.
222
-------
Fulton
A. County
B. Subarea'
C. Year
D. Allocation Order
Table 3.4-8
Industrial Point and New Source Fuel Combustion Ijnissions - Subarea Summary
10
Subarea
(D
49
COUNTY TOTAL
Point Source Ijnissions
No.(2of
Sources
1
(J)
Bnp.*
(4)
Part.
2324
2324
(5)
SO,
1010
1010
(6)
CO
18
18
(7)
IIC
(8)
MOX
New Source Emissions
O)
Emp.*
(10)
Part.
0
0
an
SOx
. o
0
(12)
CO
0
0
(13)
»IC
(14)
NOx
Total Emissions
(IS)
Emp.*
(16)
Part.
2324
2324
(17)
SOX
1010
1010
(18)
CO
18
18
(19)
HC
(20)
NOX
to
to
Fulton
A. County
B. Subarea "
C. "Year "1975
11
D. Allocation Order
Table 3.4-8
Industrial Point and New Source Fuel Combustion Emissions - Subarea Sunmary
Subarea
UJ
33
COUNTY TOTAL
Point Source Emissions
No.Uof
Sources
2
(3)
Emp.*
C4)
Part.
9
9
(5)
SOx
33
33
(6)
CO
6
6
(7)
IIC
(8)
N°x
(9)
Emp.*
New Source Emissions
(ioi
Part.
0
0
(11)
SOx
0
0
(12)
CO
0
0
(13)
HC
(14)
*°x
Total Emissions
(15)
Emp.*
(16)
Part.
9
9
(17)
SOx
33
33
(18)
CO
6
6
(19)
HC
(20)
N°x
A. County _
B. Subarea"
C. Year
Fulton
12
1975
U. Allocation Order
Table 3.4-8
Industrial Point and New Source Fuel Combustion Emissions - Subarea Summarv
Subarea
(D
49
COUNTY TOTAL
Point Source Ijnissions
Ho.(26f
Sources
1
(3)
Emp.*
(4)
Part.
1906
1906
(5)
SO,
558
558
(6)
CO
10
10
(7)
u:
(8)
NO,
New Source Ijnissions
(9)
Emp.*
(10)
Part.
389
389
(11)
SOX
114
114
(12)
CO
2
2
(13)
HC
(14)
NOX
Total Ijnissions
(15)
linp.*
(16)
Part.
2295
2295
(1-)
sox
672
672
(18)
CO
12
12
(19)
HC
(20)
N0t
*IJnployment
-------
Fulton
A. County
B. Subarea
C. Year 197S
D. Allocation Order
Table 3.4-8
Industrial Point and New Source Fuel Combustion Kmissions - Subarea Summary
13
Subarea
(1)
91 (Civil)
COUNTY TOTAL
Point Source Emissions
No. of
Sources
1
(3)
Emp.*
w
Part.
6
6
(5)
SOX
1
1
(6)
CO
6
6
(7)
HC
(8)
NOX
New Source Emissions
(9)
Bnp.*
(10)
Part.
0
0
(11)
SOx
0
0
(12)
CO
0
0
(13)
HC
(14)
NOx
Total Emissions
(15)
Emp. *
(16)
Part.
6
6
(17)
SOx
1
1
(18)
CO
6
6
(19)
HC
(20)
NOX
to
A. County
B. Subarea
C. Year
Fulton
197S
D. Allocation Order
Table 3.4-8
Industrial Point and New Source Fuel Combustion Emissions - Subarea Summary
Subarea
(1)
32
COUNTY TOTAL
Point Source Emissions
No^of
Sources
2
(3J
Emp.*
(4)
Part.
18
18
(SJ
SOx
2
2
(6)
CO
18
18
(7)
HC
(8)
NOX
New Source Emissions
#5
Emp.*
(10)
Part.
5
5
(ID
^x
1
1
(12)
CO
5
5
(13)
HC
(14)
NOX
Total Emissions
(IS)
Emp.*
(16)
Part.
23
23
(17)
SOX
3
3
(18)
CO
23
23
(19)
HC
(20)
NOX
"Employment
-------
NJ
IS)
A. County
B. Year
C.
Fulton
Table 3.4-5
Industrial Point Source Fuel Use
1980
Allocation Order
(1)
Industrial
Prnr fat
32
32
Source Identification
(2)
Name •
Mineral Wool Co.
Mineral Wool Co.
COUNTY TOTAL
(3)
Proc.
3296
3296
(4)
16
16
Coord. (5)
X
Y
Fuel Demand and Fuel Use Forecast
£1
1.63
1.63
1.63
(7)
MBTU
1746
652
2398
(8)
Emp.'
(9)
COAL
(10)
ts
'U'
£12)
*OIL
(13)
ts
(14)
D OIL
(15)
ts
(16)
NG
1663
1662
3325
(17)
> GAS
(18)
LPG
(19)
COKE
(20)
TOOD
(21)
1-ASSE
(22)
DIES
(23)
GAS
A. County
B. Year
Fulton
Table 3.4-5
Industrial Point Source Fuel Use
JS80
C. Allocation Order 3 '
(D
Industrial
Proc. Cat.
33
33
Source Identification
(ZJ
Name
Steel Works Co.
Steel Works Co.
COUNTY TOTAL
(3)
Proc.
3312
3312
(4)
11
11
Coord. (5)
X
Y
Fuel Demand and Fuel Use Forecast
(6)
re**
1.34!
1.341
1.341
U)
^fflTU
73
579
652
l»J
=mp.*
W
COAL
(10)
ts
(11)
tA
(12)
I OIL
485
485
(13)
ts
1
1
(14)
) OIL
(15)
ts
(16)
NG
580
580
(17)
P GAS
(18)
LPG
(19)
COKE
(20)
HOOD
(21)
B-ASSE
(22)
DIES
(23)
GAS
Table 3.4-5
Industrial Point Source Fuel Use
Fulton
A. County
B. Year 1980
C. Allocation Order
(1)
Industrial
Proc. Cat.
49
49
Source Identification
(ZJ
Name
Steam Supply
Steam Supply
XUNTY TOTAL
(3)
Proc.
4961
4961
(4)
Subaret
12
10
Coord. (5)
X
Y
Fuel Demand and Fuel Use Forecast
(6)
3F**
1.482
1.482
1.483
(7)
MBFU
6771
10909
176 80
(8)
Emp.*
(9)
GOAL
2944(
4363;
73075
(10)
ts
1.48
1.50
1.49
(11)
tA
12
8.2
(12)
ROII
(13)
ts
(14)
) OIL
(IS)
ts
(16)
NG
U'J
P GAS
(18)
LPG
(19)
COKE
(2U)
HOOD
(21)
94SSE
U2)
DIES
(23)
GAS
•Employment
**Growth Factor
-------
A. County Fulton
B. Year 1980
C. Allocation Order
Table 3.4-5
Industrial Point Source Fuel Use
(1)
Industrial
Proc_ Tat
91 (Civil
Source Identification
(2)
Name
I U.S. Prison
COUTTY TOTAL
(3)
Proc.
9100
(4)
13
Coord. (5)
X
Y
Fuel Demand and Fuel Use Forecast
(6)
GF**
1.672
1.672
(7)
MBTU
970
970
(8)
Emp.*
(9)
COAL
(10)
*S
(11)
U
(12)
R OIL
(13)
ts
(14)
D OIL
(IS)
ts
(16)
NG
970
970
1(17)
> GAS
(18)
LPG
(19)
COKE
(20)
WOOD
(21)
J-ASSE
(22)
DIES
(23)
GAS
•Employment
**Growth Factor
-------
ISJ
K)
Table 3.4-5a (Cont. of 3.4-5)
Industrial Point Source Fuel Combustion Emissions
A. County Fulton
B. Year 1930
C. Allocation Order
Industrial
Proc. Cat.
(1)
32
32
Source
(2)
Name
Mineral Wool Company
Mineral Wool Company
COUNTY TOTAL
Identification
(3)
Process
3296
3296
(4)
Subarea
16
16
Coord. (5)
X
Y
Fuel Combustion Emissions Forecast (tons/yr)
Part. (6)
Cont.
Emis.
9
9
18
SO* (7)
Cont.
Emis.
1
1
2
CO (8)
Cont.
Ends.
9 ,
9
18
HC (9)
Cont.
Emis.
NOX (10)
Cont.
Emis.
Table 3.4-5a (Cont. of 3.4-5)
Industrial Point Source Fuel Combustion Emissions
A. County
B. Year
C. Allocation Order
Fulton
1980
Industrial
Proc. Cat.
(1)
33
33
Source Identification
(2)
Name
Steel Works Company
Steel Works Company
COUNTY TOTAL
(3)
Process
3312
3312
(4)
Subarea
11
11
Coord. (5)
X
Y
Fuel Combustion Emissions Forecast (tons/yr)
Part. (6)
Cont.
Emis.
6
5
11
SOX (7)
Cont.
Emis.
38
1
39
CO (8)
Cont.
Emis.
1
6
7
HC (9)
Cont.
Emis.
NOx (10)
Cont.
Emis.
Table 3.4-5a (Cont. of 3.4-S)
Industrial Point Source Fuel Combustion Emissions
A. County
B. Year
Fulton
1980
C. Allocation Order
Industrial
Proc. Cat.
(1)
49
49
Source Identification
(2)
Name
Steam Supply
Steam Supply
COUNTY TOTAL
(3)
Process
4961
4961
(4)
Subarea
12
10
Coord. (5)
X
Y
Fuel Combustion Emissions Forecast (tons/yr)
Part . ?6"5
Cont.
limis.
2269
2862
5131
SOx (7)
Cont.
Emis.
665
1244
1909
CO (8)
Cont.
Emis.
12
22
34
HC (9)
Cont.
Emis.
NOX (10)
Cont.
Emis.
-------
NJ
to
oo
Table 3.4-5a (Cont. of 3.4-5)
Industrial Point Source lucl Combustion Ijnissions
A. County
B. Year
Fulton
<-. Allocation Order ^
, s Industrial
Proc. Cat.
(1)
91 (Civil)
Source Identification
(2)
Name
U. S. Prison
CCWIY TOTAL
(3)
Process
9100
(4)
Subarea
13
Coord. (5)
X
Y
» Fuel Combustion Emissions Forecast (tons/yr)
Part. (6)
Cont.
Emis.
8
8
SOx (7)
Cont.
Emis.
2
2
CO (8)
Cont.
Emis.
8
8
HC (9)
Cont.
Emis.
NOX (10)
Cont.
,
Emis.
-------
Table 3.4-6
Industrial Point and New Source Energy Itemand by Process Category
A. County Fulton
B. Year 1980
C. Allocation Order
ts)
N>
(O
Industrial
Process Category
(1)
32
33
49
91
Power Generation
Industrial Area
D. COUNTY TOTAL
Baseline Year
lixisting Point Sources
(2)
MBTU
1471
484
11922
580
14457
(3)
Emp.*
Forecast Year - All Sources
(4)
GF**
1.630
1.348
1.483
1.672
W///,
(5)
JETU
2398
652
17680
970
21700
(6)
Frm.*
Forecast Year
Fjcistinp. Point Sources
m
MBTU
1473
652
15946
941
w//<
19012
(8)
Enp.*
w///<
Forecast Year
>few Sources
(9)
MBTU
925
0
1734
29
W///
2688
flO)
Emp.*
'//////A
*En|)loyment
**Growth Factor
-------
tsJ
04
o
A. County Pulton
B. Subarea 1Q
C. Year 1980
D. Allocation Order
Table 3.4-"
Industrial New Source Juel Use By Process Category and Subarea
Industrial
Process Category
fl)
49
Power
Generation
Industrial
Area
E. SUBAREA TOTAL
Total
F.mp.*
(2)
I'oint
Source
tmp,*
13)
New
Source
Lmp.*
(4)
LAP**
(5)
l:uel Demand and 1 uel Use Forecast
fO
MBTU
0
0
(")
cau
0
0
(8)
*s
(9)
!A
(10)
:•: OR
(nj
°s
112)
D OIL
(13)
IS
(14)
NT,
(li-J
r CAS
(16)
Lpr,
an
COKE
(18)
WOOD
iiyj
9-ASSE
UO)
DIES
(21)
GAS
Fulton
A. County
B. Subarea u
C. Year I960
D. Allocation Order
Table 3.4-7
Industrial New Source Fuel Use by Process Category and Subarea
Industrial
Process Category
(D
33
Power
General ion
Industrial
Ai-oa
t. SUBAREA TOTAL
Total
limp.*
(2)
P"int
Source
limp . *
(3)
Xevv
Source
Imp."
(4)
LM'**
(5)
Fuel Demand and Fuel Use Forecast
(6)
MBTIJ
0
0
(')
COAL
(8)
\5
(9)
*A
(10)
R Oil.
0
0
(11)
IS
(12)
D OIL
(13)
ts
(14)
NO
0
0
(15)
P GAS
(16)
Iff,
(17)
COKE
(18)
WOOD
(19)
6-ASSE
(20)
DIES
(21)
GAS
**Kmployment ,U location Promrtion
Category \ch Source iJnplovF'cnt rl . . . ,
Yotal Category .Vow Source Employment rlus v;lluc nBV hc oht;''ned from Table 3.4-3.
-------
A. County
B. Subarea"
C. Year
Fulton
Table 3.4-7
Industrial New Source Fuel Use By Process Category and Subarea
12
1980
D. Allocation Order
Industrial
Process Category
(D
49
Power
Generation
Industrial
Area
E. SUBAREA TOTAL
Total
¥•1 i *
onp>
(2)
foint
Source
Emp.*
(3)
Source
Emp.*
(4)
EAP**
(S)
Fuel Demand and Fuel Use Forecast
(fO
MBTU
1734
1734
V)
COAL
5815
5815
(8)
IS
1.48
1.48
(9)
t.A
12.0
12.0
(10)
R OIL
UD
IS
112)
D OIL
(13)
IS
(14)
NG
(IS)
P GAS
(16)
LPG
(17)
COKE
(18)
WOOD
(19)
3-ASSE
(20)
DIES
(21)
GAS
Fulton
A. County _
B. Subarea""
C. Year '1980
Table 3.4-7
Industrial New Source Fuel Use by Process Category and Subarea
13
D. Allocation Order
Industrial
Process Category
(D
91 (Civil)
Power
Generation
Industrial
ArM
E. SUBAREA TOTAL
Total
Bap.*
(2)
Point
Source
Emp.*
(35
New
Source
Enp.*
(4)
EAP**
(5)
Fuel Demand and Fuel Use Forecast
(6)
MBTU
29
29
(7)
COAL
(8)
ts
(9)
U
(10)
R OIL
(11)
ts
(12)
D OIL
,
(13)
ts
(14)
NG
29
29
(IS)
P GAS
(16)
LPG
(17)
COKE
(18)
WOOD
(19)
B-ASSE
(20)
DIES
(21)
GAS
tSJ
04
A. County _
B. Subarea
C. Year
Fulton
Table 3.4-7
Industrial New Source Fuel Use by Process Category and Subarea
1980
D. Allocation Order
Industrial
Process Category
(D
32
Power
Generation
Industrial
Area
E. SUBAREA TOTAL
Total
Emp.*
(2)
Point
Source
Emp.*
(3)
New
Source
Emp.*
(4)
EAP**
(5)
Fuel Demand and Fuel Use Forecast
(6)
MBTU
925
925
(7)
COAL
(8)
ts
(9)
tA
(10)
R OIL
(11)
ts
(12)
D OIL
(13)
ts
(14)
NG
1282
1282
(IS)
P GAS
(16)
LPG
(17)
COKE
(18)
WOOD
(19)
B-ASSE
(20)
DIES
(21)
GAS
**Employment Allocation Proportion
Subarea Category New Source Employment
Total Category fiew Source Employment
This value may be obtained from Table 3.4-3.
-------
Table 3.4-7a (Cent, of 3.4-7)
Industrial New Source Fuel Combustion Emissions by Process Category and Subarea
A. County Fulton
B. Subarea
C. Year _
U. Allocation
10
Industrial
Process Category
(1)
49
Power Ciencration
Industrial Area
L. COUNTY TOTAL
New Source Bnissions (tons/yr)
Part. (2)
Controls
I-Jnis.
0
0
SOX (3)
Controls
Emis.
0
0
CO (4)
Controls
linis.
0
0
HC (5)
Controls ! Fmis.
Nt)x (6)
Controls
linis.
A. County
B. Subarea IT
Table 3.4-7A (Com. of 3.4-7)
Industrial New Source Fuel Combustion Ijnissions by Process Category and Subarea
Fulton
Year 1980
\1 local ion Order
Industrial
Process Category
(1)
33
Power lienerat ion
Industrial Area
1 . COUNTY Tiri'AI.
New Source Emissions (tons/)T)
Part. (2)
Controls
lanis.
0
0
SOX (3)
Ixjntrols
Ijnis.
0
0
cn (4)
Controls
limis.
0
0
1IC (5)
Control*
limis.
Wx (b)
Controls
Ijnis.
•When following an Order 1 allocation procedure, only the "Industrial Area" row of this table will be used.
232
-------
A. County _
B. Subarea"
C. Year
D.
Table 3.4-7a (Cont. of 3.4-7)
Industrial New Source Fuel Combustion Emissions by Process Category and Subarea
Fulton
1980
Allocation Order
Industrial
Process Category
(D
49
Power Generation
Industrial Area
E. COUNTY TOTAL
New Source Emissions (tons/yr)
Part. (2)
Controls
Emis.
558
558
SOX (3)
Controls
Emis.
163
163
CO (4)
Controls
Emis.
3
3
HC (5)
Controls
Emis.
NOx (6)
Controls
Limis.
A. County
Table 3.4-7A (Cont. of 3.4-7)
Industrial New Source Fuel Combustion Emissions by Process Category and Subarea
Fulton
13
B. Subarea
C. Year
D. Allocation Order
1980
Industrial
Process Category
(D
91 (Civil)
Power Generation
Industrial Area
L. COUNTY TOTAL
New Source Emissions (tons/yr)
Part. (2)
Controls
Emis.
0
0
SOX (3)
Controls
Emis.
0
0
CO (4)
Controls
Emis.
0
0
HC (5)
Controls
Emis.
NOx (CO
Controls
linis.
Table 3.4-7A (Cont. of 3.4-7)
Industrial New Source Fuel Combustion Emissions by Process Category and Suharea
A. County Fulton
B. Subarea~ lo - '
C. Year 1980 •
D. Allocation Order 3
Industrial
Process Category
(D
32
Power Generation
Industrial Area
E. COUNTY TOTAL
New Source Emissions (tons/yr)
Part. (2)
Controls
Emis.
11
11
SOX (3)
Controls
Emis.
1
1
CO (4)
Controls
Emis.
11
11
HC (5)
bntrols
Fjnis.
ijWx (b)
Controls
.
Hmis.
*When following an Order 1 allocation procedure, only the "Industrial Area" row of this table will be used.
233
-------
A.
B.
i .
H.
County
Subareu
icar
Al local ion
Fulton
10
1980
Order
3
Industn.il Point
l.iHc i.4 8
ki \o. Source luc! "Pl.u-t ion Ijnissions - Subarca Sunnan
Suharea
(1)
49
awn TOTAL
Point Source (.missions
i-i
No. of
Sources
1
(3)
1X1)1.*
(4)
Part.
2862
2862
(5)
SO.
1244
1244
10)
CO
22
1 -i
(")
lie
(8!
Nt\
NCI* Source (.missions
(l'i
Inp.*
110)
Part.
0
0
111)
so.
0
0
(12)
CO
0
0
113)
IIC
(14)
\0,
lotal Ijnissions
(15)
Ijnp.*
(16)
Part.
2862
2862
M")
so.
1244
1244
(18)
Cn
22
22
(I'.')
IIC
(20)
\0V
A. County
B. Subarea
C. Year
Fulton
11
L). Allocation Order
lirai
Table 3.4-8
Industrial Point and Ncu Source 1'uel ibnbustion Ijnissions - Subarea Sumnan'
Subarea
(1)
33
COUNTY TOTAL
Point Source Emissions
No!-if
Sources
2
(J)
Ijnp.*
(•»
Part.
11
11
f5)
SO,
39
39
f6'!
CO
7
7
ri
IIC
C8)
•V\
Ncu Source
(9)
lonp.*
(10)
Part .
0
0
(in
Si'
0
0
missions
112)
CO
0
n
(131
lie
(14)
NPx
lotal Ijnissions
(15)
lanp.*
(16)
fart.
11
11
ir)
sox
39
39
(18)
CO
7
7
(101
HC
(20J
NO,
A. O)unt>- Pulton
B. Subarea
C. Year
l>. Ulocation Order
12
1980
Table 3.4-8
Industrial Point and \eu Source l-uel Combustion Ijnissions
Subarea Sumnars'
Suliarea
(U
49
COUTfTY TOTAL
Point Source |jins>ion<
Jb.('of
Sources
1
(3)
Ump.*
(4)
Part.
2269
2269
(5)
SO.
665
665
(fc)
CO
12
12
(7)
lie
(8)
NO.
New Source Ijnissions
(9)
Ijnp.*
(10)
Part.
558
558
HI)
S0«
163
163
(12)
CO
3
3
(13)
IK'
(14)
V\
Total Ijnissions
(IS)
Ijnp.*
UM
Part.
2827
2827
(I")
so.
828
828
f!8)
I'O
IS
IS
(10)
IIC
(20)
NO
*l.niplo>"mcnt
-------
A.
B.
c:.
D.
Countv Fulton
Subarea 13
Year 1980
Allocation Order
3
Table 3.4-8
Industrial Point and New Source Fuel Combustion I .missions - Suharca Summarv
Subarea
(1)
91 (Civil)
COUNTY TOTAL
Point Source 1 '.missions
vJ2)r
No. of
Sources
1
(3)
Lmp.*
(4)
Part .
8
8
(5)
SO,
2
2
(6)
CO
8
8
(7)
IK:
(8)
NOX
\CK .Source Emissions
C-'J
IjTlp.*
(10)
Part .
0
0
(11)
-S0>
0
0
(12)
CO
0
0
(13)
IIC
(14)
NOx
Total linissions
(15)
linp.*
(16)
Part.
8
8
(17)
SO,
2
2
(18)
CO
8
8
(19)
i»x
(9)
limp.*
New Source F-jnissions
(10)
Part.
11
11
(11)
Wx
1
1
(12)
CO
11
11
(IS)
HC
(14)
^x
Total Emissions
(15)
Emp.*
(16)
Part.
29
29
(17)
S°x
3
3
(18)
CO
29
29
(19)
HC
(20)
^x
*l mployment
-------
N)
O4
0\
A. County
B. Year
Fulton
Table 3.4-5
Industrial Point Source Fuel Use
C. Allocation
.985
(1)
Industrial
£jj^jg^
32
32
Source Identification
(2)
Name
Mineral Wool
Mineral Wool
COUNTY TOTAL
(3)
Proc.
3296
3296
(4)
16
16
Coord. (5)
X
Y
Fuel Demand and Fuel Use Forecast
(6)
1.934
1.934
1.934
(7)
MBTU
2071
774
2845
(8)
Emp.*
(9)
COAL
(10)
ts
(11)
tA
i(12)
I OIL
(13)
tS
(14)
) OIL
(15)
ts
(16)
NG
1972
1973
3945
1(17)
? GAS
(18)
LPG
(19)
COKE
(20)
V.DOD
(21)
3-ASSE
(22)
DIES
(23)
GAS
A. County
B. Year ~~
C. Allocation Order
Fulton
Table 3.4-S
Industrial Point Source Fuel Use
1985
(1)
Industrial
Proc. Cat.
33
33
Source Identification
(V
Name
Steel Works Co.
Steel Works Co.
COUNTY TOTAL
(3)
Proc.
3312
3312
(4)
11
11
Coord. (5)
X
Y
Fuel Demand and Fuel Use Forecast
(6)
GF**
1.590
1.590
L.590
cn
MBTU
86
684
770
(8)
•mp.»
(9)
COAL
110)
ts
(11)
tA
(12)
I OIL
572
572
(13)
ts
1
1
(14)
) OIL
(15)
ts
(16)
NG
684
684
(17)
P GAS
(18)
LPG
(19)
COKE
(20)
WOOD
(21)
B4SSE
(22)
MES
(23)
GAS
Table 3.4-S
Industrial Point Source Fuel Use
Fulton
A. County
B. Year 1985
C. Allocation Order
(1)
Industrial
Proc. Cat.
49
49
Source Identification
(27
Name
Steam Supply
Steam Supply
COUNTY TOTAL
(3)
Proc.
4961
4961
(4)
12
10
Coord. (5)
k X
Y
Fuel Demand and Fuel Use Forecast
TO
;F**
1.82f
1.82(
1.83f
(n
MBTU
8347
L3446
21793
(.8)
Emp.*
(9) 1 (10)
COAL tS
3629^. 4£
53783 1.50
900 8(
1.49
(H)
tA
12
8.2
(12)
R Oil
(13)
ts
(14)
)OIL
(IS)
ts
(16)
NG
U'/J
P GAS
(18)
LPG
(19)
COKE
(20)
W»D
(21)
3-ASSE
(22)
DIES
(2i)
GAS
'Employment
••Growth Factor
-------
to
O4
-•a
Fulton
Table 3.4-5
Industrial Point Source Fuel Use
A. County
B. Year '
C. Allocation Order
_198S_
(1)
Industrial
Prnc. Cat .
91 (Civil
Source Identification
(2)
Name
U.S. Prism
COUNTY TOTAL
(3)
PTOC.
9100
(4)
13
Coord. (5)
X
Y
Fuel Demand and Fuel Use Forecast
G$
(7)
MBTU
2.138 124C
2.13(
; 1240
(8)
Enp.'
(9)
COAL
(10)
ts
(11)
tA
(12)
I OIL
(13)
IS
(14)
) OIL
(IS)
IS
(16)
NC
1240
1240
(17)
3 GAS
(18)
LPG
(19)
COKE
(20)
V.DOD
(21)
J-ASSE
(22)
DIES
(23)
GAS
*Enployment
**Growth Factor
-------
NJ
C*
oo
lablc 3.4-S;) u ont . of 3.4-Sj
iisr mil Point ^ourcc- lucl (nnlnistion lnissinn~
A. County Fulton
B. Year 1985
C. Allocation Order
Industrial
Proc. Cat.
(1)
32
32
Source lUenti f icat ion
(2)
Name
Mineral Wool Company
Ntineral Wool CccnDanv
COUMV TOTAL
(3)
Process
3296
3296
(•»)
Suharca
16
16
Coord. 1 3)
X
V
luc
Part, in)
( :on t .
! .n i s .
12
11
23
I'orobust ion Ijnissions Forecast (tons/yr)
.S),
font.
-)
Ijnis.
1
2
3
CO (8j
Cont .
limis.
11
12
23
HI: O)
Cont.
I-jnis.
NOX (10)
Cont.
Emis.
Table 3.4-Sa (Cont. of 3.4-5)
Industrial Point -Source Fuel Combustion F.nissions
A. County
B. Year _
C. Allocation Order
Fulton
1985
Industrial
Proc. Cat.
(1)
33
33
Source Identification
(2)
Name
Steel (forks Conpany
Steel Works Conpany
cournr TOTAL
(3)
Process
3312
3312
(•»)
Suharea
11
11
Coord. (5)
X
V
l-'uel Combustion Emissions Forecast (tons/yr)
Part. (6)
Cont .
Imis.
7
6
13
SO, (7)
Cont.
limis.
44
2
46
CO (8)
Cont.
Ijnis.
->
6
8
HC (9)
Cont .
Fjnis.
NO, (10)
Cont.
FJTUS.
Table 3.4-Sa (Cont. of 3.4-S)
Industrial l"oint Source Fuel Combustion Ijnissions
Fulton
A. County
B. Year _
C. Allocation Order
1985
Industrial
Proc. Cat.
(U
49
49
Source Identification
(Z)
Name
Steam Supply
Steam Supply
f3)
Process
4961
4961
«
f4)
.Suharea
12
10
Coord. (5)
X
Y
Fuel Combustion Emissions Forecast (tons/yr)
Part . ((>]
Cont.
Fjnis.
2859
3528
6387
SO, (7)
Cont .
Finis.
837
1534
2371
CO (8)
Cont.
Emis.
IS
27
42
HC (9)
Cont.
Umis.
J«x (10)
Cont.
Emis.
-------
N>
Crt
VO
lahlc 5.4-5a (Cont. of 3.4-5)
Industrial Point Source l-'uel Combustion l-jnissions
\. County
h. Year '
C.
Fulton
1985
Al 1 ocation Order
Industrial
1'roc. Cat.
(1)
"' Civil)
Source Idem i f icat ion
Ul
Name
I). J>". Prison
COUNTY TOTAL
(3)
Process
9100
14)
Suharca
13
Coord. (5)
X
Y
Fuel Combustion Emissions Forecast (tons/yr)
Part. (6)
Cont.
limis.
11
11
SV (7)
Cont .
IJnis.
2
2
00 (8)
Cont.
Bnis.
11
11
HC (9)
Cont.
Emis.
NOx (10)
Cont.
Emis.
-------
Tail k- --,. M,
Industrial Point and Ne>\ Source I nero IX'maikl In- Process Cateeory
A. County Fulton
B. Year 1985
C. Allocation Order3"
to
*=.
o
Indust rial
Process Category
(1)
32
33
49
91
Power Generation
Industrial Area
D. COUNTY TOTAI.
Baseline Year
Lxistint; Point Sources
(2)
,'IBTU
1471
484
11922
580
14457
m
Ijnp. *
It) recast Year - Al 1 Sources
C4)
(;j;**
1.934
1.590
1.828
2.138
W///,
(5)
.'ffiTU
2845
770
21793
1240
26648
(M
}'rv>.*
l:orecasf Year
Ixistint' I'oint Sources
<")
MBTU
1829
770
19851
1193
WM
23643
fS)
I'JTf).*
M^
!:o recast Year
New Sources
('.')
'wriJ
1016
0
1942
47
w////
3005
fill
Rmp.*
W//A
*laH'lo)Tient
**Growth Factor
-------
K)
A. County
B. Subarea"
C. Year
Fulton
Table 3.4-7
Industrial New Source l-'uel Use By Process Category and Subarea
10
1985
D. Allocation Order
Industrial
Process Category
(1)
49
Power
Generation
Industrial
Area
E. SUBAREA TOTAL
Total
IJiip.*
(2)
Toint
Source
Emp.*
(3)
New
Source
Dmp.*
(4)
LAP**
(5)
Fuel Demand and Fuel Use Forecast
{*)
MBTU
0
0
(7)
COAL
0
0
(8)
vs
W
!.A
(10)
R OIL
(11)
IS
(12)
D OIL
(13)
IS
(14)
NT.
(IS)
P GAS
(ie>)
LPG
(17)
COKE
(18)
HOOD
(19)
a-ASSE
(20)
DIES
(21)
GAS
Fulton
A. County ___^__
B. Subarea'""' 11
C. .Year ~ 1555"
Table 3.4-7
Industrial New Source Fuel Use by Process Category and Subarea
D. Allocation Order
Industrial
Process Category
(D
33
Power
General ion
Industrial
Arpa
li. SUBAREA TOTAL
Total
Imp.*
(2}
Point
Source
(3)
Nev\
Source
l3Hp.*
(4)
IAP**
(5)
Fuel Demand and Fuel Use Forecast
(b)
MBTt!
0
0
(7)
COAL
(8)
IS
(9)
»A
(10)
R OIL
0
0
(11)
ts
(12)
n OIL
(13)
IS
(14)
NG
0
0
(IS)
P GAS
(16)
LPG
(17)
COKE
(18)
WOOD
(19)
B-ASSE
(20)
DIES
(21)
GAS
•Employment
•'Employment VIlocation Proportion
Suharca tiatcgorv Nch Source l-
Total C.-itcjion- S,'cv« Source liiiplojwnt
I'liis value may he obtained from Tahlc 3.4-3.
-------
A. County
B. Subarea"
C. Year
Fulton
Table 3.4-7
Industrial New Source l:uel Use By Process Category and Subarea
19B5
J. Allocation Order
Industrial
Process Category
(1)
49
Power
Generation
Industrial
Area
E. SUBAREA TOTAL
Total
Bap,*
(2)
i-o int
Source
Ernp.*
(3)
"TJew —
Source
Drp.*
(4)
£AP*»
(V
Fuel Demand and Fuel Use Forecast
i»
MBTU
1942
1942
(7)
COAL
6512
6S12
(8)
IS
1.48
1.48
(9)
IA
12.0
12.0
(10)
R OIL
(11)
".S
(12)
D OIL
(13)
US
(H)
NG
(15)
P CAS
(16)
LPG
(17)
con
(18)
WOOD
(19)
B-ASSE
(20)
DIES
(21)
GAS
A. County
B. Subarea"
C. Year
Fulton
Table 3.4-7
Industrial New Source Fuel Use by Process Category and Subarea
1985
D. Allocation Order
Industrial
Process Category
(D
91 (Civil)
Power
Generation
Industrial
Art»fl
E. SUBAREA TOTAL
Total
•»'
Point
Source
Emp.*
(3)
?Jew
Source
Emp.*
(4)
EAP»*
(5)
Fuel Demand and Fuel Use forecast
(6)
MBTU
47
47
(7)
GOAL
(8)
IS
(9)
IA
(10)
R OIL
(11)
IS
(12)
D OIL
(13)
IS
(14)
NO
47
47
(IS)
P GAS
(16)
LPO
(17)
COKE
(18)
WOOD
(19)
B-ASSE
(20)
DIES
(21)
GAS
to
A. County
B. Subarea""
C. Year
Pulton
Table 3.4-7
Industrial New Source Fuel Use by Process Category and Subarea
D. Allocation Order
1985
Industrial
Process Category
(1)
32
K>wer
Generation
Industrial
ATCS
E. SUBAREA TOTAL
Total
Emp.*
(2}
Point
Source
Emp. *
(3)
New
Source
tmp.*
(4)
EAP**
(5)
Fuel Demand and Fuel Use Forecast
(6)
fffiTU
1016
1016
(7)
COAL
(8)
IS
0)
IA
(10)
ROIL
(11)
IS
(12)
DOIL
(13)
IS
(14)
NG
1408
1408
(15)
P GAS
(16)
LPC
(17)
COKE
(18)
WOOD
(19)
e-AssE
(20)
DIES
(21)
GAS
Allocation Proportion - g^^k^rEgy This value nay be obtained fron Table 3.4-3
-------
A. County
B. Suharea~
C. Year
Table 3.4-7a (Cbnt. of 3.4-7)
Industrial New Source Fuel Combustion Emissions by Process Category and Subarea
Pulton
10
1). Allocation
198!
Order
985
Industrial
Process Catcgorv
(1)
49
Power ('.operation
Industrial Area
i.. axiNTY HUM.
New Source Ijnissions (tons/yr)
Part. (2)
Controls
Ijiiis.
0
0
SOx (3)
Cont rols
Pjn i s .
0
0
CO (4)
Controls
Ijiiis.
0
0
IK: (sj
Cont rol s
Prnis.
NO, «>)
Cont rol <
I jn i > .
Table S.4-7A (Cont. of 5.4-")
Industrial \ci» Source l-ucl Comhustion Ijnissions by Process Category anil Subarea
A. County Fulton
B. Subarca
('. Year
11
1985
H. All ocatloh Order
Industrial
Process I'atogorv
(1)
33
I'oucr tieneration
Industrial Area
1.. CtXINTY Tirr.M.
.4
Neu Source Ijnissions (tons/NT)
Part. (2)
Controls
I'.mis.
0
0
SI, (3)
."ontrols
l-jnis.
0
0
CO (4)
Controls
I-JP'I s.
0
0
IK: is)
Cont re Is
1 .III 1 S .
V. ((>)
* out rols
1 jn i r- .
*When following an Order 1 allocation procedure, only the "Industrial Area" row of this table will he used.
243
-------
Table 3.4-7a (Cont. of 3.4-7)
Industrial New Source Fuel Combustion Emissions by Process Category and Subarea
A.
B.
C.
D.
County
Subarea
Year
Allocation (
Fulton
12
1985
Jrder
3
Industrial
Process Category
(D
49
Power Generation
Industrial Area
E. COUNTY TOTAL
New Source Emissions (tons/yf)
Part. (2)
Controls
Ends.
625
625
SOx (3)
Controls
Emis.
183
183
CO (4)
Controls
Emis.
3
3
HC (5)
Controls
Emis.
NOx (6)
Controls
Emis.
Table 3.4-7A (Cont. of 3.4-7)
Industrial New Source Fuel Combustion Emissions by Process Category and Subarea
A.
B.
C.
D.
County
Subarea
Year
Allocation
Fulton
13
1985
Order
3
Industrial
Process Category
(D
91 (Civil)
Power Generation
Industrial Area
L. COUNTY TOTAL
New Source Emissions (tons/yr)
Part. (2)
Controls
Fjnis.
0
0
SOX (3)
Controls
Emis.
0
0
CO (4)
Controls
Emis.
0
0
HC (5)
Controls
Emis.
NOx (6)
Controls
Emis.
A. County
B. Subarea"
C. Year
Table 3.4-7A {Cont. of 3.4-7)
Industrial New Source Fuel Combustion Emissions by Process Category and Subarea
Fulton
16
D. Allocation Order
1985
Industrial
Process Category
(D
32
Power Generation
Industrial Area
:. COUNTY TOTAL
New Source Emissions (tons/yr)
Part. (2)
Controls
Emis.
12
12
SOX (3)
Controls
Emis.
1
1
CO (4)
Controls
Ends.
12
12
HC (5)
Controls
Emis.
NOx (6)
Controls
Emis.
*When following an Order 1 allocation procedure, only the "Industrial Area" row of this table will be used.
244
-------
A. County _
B. Subarea
C. Year '
D. Allocation Order
Fulton
Table 3.4-8
Industrial Point and New Source Fuel Combustion Emissions - Subarea Summary
10
I98S
Subarea
(1)
49
COtWTY TOTAL
Point Source Emissions
Nof'of
Sources
1
(3)
Emp. *
(4)
Part.
3528
3528
IS)
sox
1534
1534
(6)
CO
27
27
(7)
HC
(8)
NOX
New Source Emissions
(9)
Emp.*
(10)
Part.
0
0
(11)
SOx
0
0
(12)
CO
0
0
(13)
HC
(14)
NOx
Total Emissions
(15)
Emp.*
.
(16)
Part.
3528
3528
(17)
SOx
1534
1534
(18)
CO
27
27
(19)
HC
(20)
NOx
NJ
4*>
tn
A. County
B. Subarea
C. Year
Fulton
1985
D. Allocation order
Table 3.4-8
Industrial Point and New Source Fuel Combustion Emissions - Subarea Summary
Subarea
lij
33
COUNTY TOTAL
Point Source Emissions
NoPof
Sources
2 .
(3J
Emp.*
14)
Part.
13
13
(5)
SOx
46
46
(6)
CO
8
8
(7)
HC
(8)
NOX
(9)
Emp.*
New Source Emissions
(io)
'art.
0
0
(11)
S°x
0
0
(12)
CO
0
0
(13)
HC
(14)
NOX
Total Emissions
(IS)
Enip,*
(16)
Part.
13
13
(17)
S°x
46
46
(18)
00
8
8
(19)
HC
(20)
NOX
Fulton
A. County _
B. Subarea"
C. Year 1985
12
1). Al location Order
Table 3.4-8
Industrial Point and New Source Fuel Combustion Emissions - Subarea Summary
Subarea
(D
49
COUNT/ TOTAL
Point Source Emissions
{*><2of
Sources
1
(3)
linp.*
(4)
Part.
2859
2859
(5)
SOx
837
837
(6)
CO
IS
IS
(7)
1C
(8)
NOx
New Source Emissions
(9)
Emp.*
(10)
Part.
625
625
(11)
SOx
183
183
(12)
CO
3
3
(13)
HC
(14)
NOx
Total Emissions
(IS)
Emp.*
(16)
Part.
3484
3484
(17)
sox
1020
1020
(18)
CO
18
18
(19)
HC
(20)
N0¥
*l.mploymcnt
-------
A.
B.
C.
D.
County Fulton
subarea iJ>
rear 1985
Allocation Order r
Table 3.4-8
Industrial Point and New Source Fuel Combustion Ijnissions - Subarea Summary
Subarea
(D
91 (Civil)
COUNTY TOTAL
Point Source Emissions
NoPof
Sources
1
(3)
Bnp.*
(4)
Part.
11
11
(51
SOX
2
2
(6)
CO
11
11
(7)
HC
(8)
,MOX
New Source [.missions
(9)
Enip.*
(10)
Part.
0
0
(11)
SOx
0
0
(12)
CO
0
0
(13)
HC
(14)
NOx
Total Emissions
(IS)
Emp.*
(16)
Part.
11
11
(17)
sox
2
2
(18)
CO
11
11
(19)
HC
(20)
NOX
to
A. County
B. Subarea
C. Year
Fulton
1985
D. Allocation Order
Table 3.4-8
Industrial Point and New Source Fuel Combustion Emissions - Subarea Summary
Subarea
UJ
32
COUNTY TOTAL
Point Source Emissions
No.l'of
Sources
2
C-SJ
Emp.*
(")
Part.
23
23
(5)
SOx
3
3
(6)
CO
23
23
(7)
1C
(8)
NO
.iux
New Source Emissions
(9)
Einp. *
(10)
Part.
12
12
(11)
SO
°*-x
1
1
(12)
CO
12
12
(13)
HC
(14)
N°x
Total Emissions
(IS)
Emp.*
(16)
Part.
35
35
(17)
S°x
4
4
(18)
CO
35
35
(19)
HC
(20)
NOX
•Employment
-------
B.2.5 Solid Waste Incineration Emissions
ALLOCATION PROCEDURE
Order 1
Allocate solid waste quantity by population and by Industrial employment.
Order 2
Allocate solid waste quantity by population and by commercial/institutional
and industrial employment*
Order 3
Determine solid waste quantity in each subarea.
247
-------
Sequence of Tables
Allocation
Procedure
Order I
tv)
4*
00
3.1-1
3.5-1
3.5-2
3.5-3
3.5-4
Orders 2 and 3
3.1-1
3.3-3
3.5-1
3.5-2
3.5-3
3.5-4
Fig. 3.5-1 Solid Waste Disposal Allocation Sequence
-------
ASSUMPTION AND LIMITATIONS OF THE EXAMPLE
FOR SOLID WASTE INCINERATION EMISSIONS
A. All demographic and land use projections developed in forecasting commer-
cial/institutional and industrial emissions were directly applied to the
analysis of solid waste incineration emissions.
B. Emissions from residential incineration have been deleted from this sub-
county analysis because residential solid waste incineration was not
treated in the Atlanta Air Pollutant Emission Inventory (October, 1969),
which was used as a substitute for county-wide estimates of refuse disposal
that would normally be obtained from the analysis prescribed in Volume 7
of the Guidelines. Since residential incineration is generally considered
to account for only a minor portion of the emissions from open burning, it
was reasoned that excluding this component would not lead to significant
underprediction of emissions from incineration sources.
C. The commercial/institutional and industrial land use allocation proportions
derived from the assumptions specified in previous sections of this appen-
dix have been applied directly to this analysis of solid waste emissions
from these sources. To make the commercial/institutional and industrial
subarea designations compatible, super districts 16, 18 and 19, which were
treated separately for industrial sources, have been aggregated and treated
as the residual for this analysis.
249
-------
Table 3.1-1
Population-Based Allocation Proportions for Subcounty Areas
A. County Fulton
B. Year
1970
C. Allocation Order
(1)
Sub areas
Atlanta
Fairburn
Hapeville
Rosswell
Union City
East Point
College Park
SUBAREA TOTAL
Residual
D. COUNTY TOTAL
(2)
Population.
455,140
3,143
9,567
5,430
3,031
39,315
12,305
527,931
79,661
607,592
(3)
Allocation Proportion
.749
.005
.016
.009
.005
.065
.020
.869
.131
1.0
Residual is equal to the COUNTY TOTAL (row D, column [2]) minus the
sum of the population accounted for by all specified subcounty areas.
N
RP = TPOP Z POP.
where:
RP » Residual population not accounted for
by specified subareas
TPOP - COUVTY TOTAL (row D. column [2])
POP. • Population in each specified subcounty
area i.
250
-------
Table 3.3-3
Corrercial/Institutional Employment-Based
Allocation Proportions for Subcounty Areas
Fulton
A. County
B. Year '
C. Allocation Order
197.0
(ID
(2)
(3)
Subarea
10 - CBD
11 - Northeast
12 - Northwest
13 - Southeast
I4 " Southwest
15 - Tri-Cities
17 - Buckhead
SUBAREA TOTAL
Residual
COUNTY TOTAL
Commercial/
Institutional
Employment
41,877
37,957
21,211
18,619
14,800
16,511
13,798
164,773
4,858
169,631
Allocation Proportion
.247
.224
.125
.110
.087
.097
.081
.971
.029
1.0
D.
251
-------
A. County
B. Year '_
C. Allocation Order
Table 3.5-1
Manufacturing Employment-Based
Allocation Proportions for Subcounty Areas
Fulton
1970
(1)
Subareas
10 - CBD
11 - Northeast
12 - Northwest
13 - Southeast
14 - Southwest
15 - Tri-Cities
17 - Budchead
SUBAREA TOTAL
Residual
COUNTY TOTAL
(2)
Industrial
Land Use
133
795
1,665
1,137
930
825
125
5,610
425
6,035
(3)
Allocation Proportion
.022
.132
.276
.188
.154
.136
.021
t.
.930
.071
1.0
D.
252
-------
Table 3.5-2
Annual Solid Waste Incineration
A. County
B. Year
Fulton
1970
C. Allocation Order
CD
Subareas
10 - CBD
11 - Northeast
12 - Northwest
13 - Southeast
14 - Southwest
15 - Tri-Cities
17 - Buckhead
SUBAREA TOTAL
Residual
D. COUNTY TOTAL*
Annual Solid Waste Incineration by Source
(Tons/yr)
Residential
C2)
Or.- Site
ticin.
C3)
Open
Burning
Commercial/Institutional
W
On- Site
Incin.
35,000
31,741
17,712
15,587
12,328
13,745
11.477
137,591
4,109
141,700
(5)
Open
Burning
12,250
11,109
6.199
5,456
4,315
4.811
4r017
48.157
1.438
49.595
Industrial
(6)
On-Site
Incin.
1.283
7,696
16r091
10,960
8,978
7.929
1.224
54.161
4.139
58.300
n
Open
Biar-ir.z
6.609
39,653
82,912
56.476
46.262
40P855
6.309
279.076
21 ^29
300. 40^
*1968 Data
253
-------
Table 3.5-3
Solid Waste Incineration Bnission Factors
Residential
Cojimercial/
Institutional
3
CD
On-Site Incineration
Open Burning
On-Site Incineration
Open Burning
On-Site Incineration
Open Burning
Emission Factors
(2)
Part.
7
Ib/ton
37
Ib/ton
7
Ib/ton
37
Ib/ton
(5)
2.5
Ib/ton
2.5
Ib/ton
2.5
Ib/ton
2.5
Ib/ton
-(4)
00
10
Ib/ton
NA
10
Ib/ton
NA
(5)
HC *
(6)
*These pollutants have been excluded from this analysis because they are
to be treated on an AQCR basis.
254
-------
Table 3.5-4
Solid Waste Incineration Emissions
Allocated to Subcounty Areas
Fulton
A. County
B. Year '
C. Allocation Order
1970
(1)
Sub-areas
10 - CBD
11 ~ Northeast
12 - Northwest
13 - Southeast
14 - Southwest
15 - Tri -Cities
17 - Buckhead
SUBAREA TOTAL
Residual
D. COUNTY TOTAL
missions
Qtons/yr)
CO
Part.
485
1,103
1,811
1,270
1,036
943
241
6,889
461
7,350
(3)
S0x
69
113
154
110
90
84
29
649
39
688
(4)
CO
181
197
169
133
107
108
64
959
41
1,000
C5)
HC
(6)
N0x
255
-------
Table 3.1-1
Population-Based Allocation Proportions for Subcounty Areas
A. County Fulton
B. Year 1975
C. Allocation Order
(1)
Subareas
Atlanta
Fairburn
Hapeville
Rosswell
Union City
East Point
College Park
SUBAREA TOTAL
Residual
D. ODUNTY TOTAL
(2)
Population
441,486
4,620
9,758
8,905
6,062
43,640
17,473
531,944
106,028
637,972
(3)
Allocation Proportion
. .692
.007
.'015
.013
.008
.068
.027
.830
.17
1.0
Residual is equal to the COUNTY TOTAL (row D, column [2]) minus the
sum of the population accounted for by all specified subcounty areas.
RP = TPOP
N
r POP.
where:
RP • Residual population not accounted for
by specified subareas
TPOP = COUNTY TOTAL (row D, column [2])
POP. = Population in each specified subcounty
area i.
256
-------
Table 3.3-3
Commercial/Institutional Employment-Based
Allocation Proportions for Subcounty Areas
Fulton
A. County
B. Year '
C. Allocation Order
1975
(2)
(3)
Subarea
10 - CBD
11 - Northeast
12 - Northwest
13 - Southeast
14 - Southwest
15 - Tri-Cities
17 - Buckhead
SUBAREA TOTAL
Residual
COUNTY -TOTAL
Commercial/
Institutional
Employment
45,091
38^150
23,736
19,641
16,064
18,151
15,801
176,634
10,664
187,298
Allocation Proportion
.241
.203
.127
.105
.086
.097
.084
.943
.057
1.0
D.
257
-------
A. County
B. Year '_
C. Allocation Order
Table 3.5-1
Manufacturing Employment-Based
Allocation Proportions for Subcounty Areas
Fulton
1975
(1)
Subareas
10 - CBD
11 - Northeast
12 - Northwest
4
13 - Southeast
14 - Southwest
15 - Tri-Cities
17 - Buckhead
SUBAREA TOTAL
Residual
COUNTY TOTAL
(2)
Industrial
Land Use
132
735
1,759
1,151
1,006
846
146
5,775
734
6,509
(3)
•Allocation Proportion
.020
.113
.270
.177
.155
.130
.022
.887
.113
1.0
D.
258
-------
Table 3.5-2
Annual Solid Waste Incineration
A. County Fulton
B. Year "
1975
C. Allocation Order
(1)
Subareas
10 - CBD
11 - Northeast
12 - Northwest
13 - Southeast
14 - Southwest
15 - Tri-Cities
17 - Buddiead
SUBAREA TOTAL
Residual
D. GDIKTY TOTAL
Annual Solid Waste Incineration by Source
(Tons/yr)
Residential
(2)
On- Site
Incin.
(3)
Open
Burning
jommercial/Institutional
(4)
On- Site
Incin.
37.706
31.761
19,870
16.428
13,455
15.176
13,142
147,538
8,918
156,458
(5)
Open
Burning
13.197
11,116
6,955
5.750
4.709
5.312
4,600
51,639
3,121
54,760
Industrial
(6)
On-Site
Incin.
1.258
7.105
16,977
11.129
9.746
8.174
1,383
55,772
7,105
62,877
(•'•
Open
Burr-ir-ft
6.480
36,610
87,476
57.346
50.218
42.118
7,128
287,376
36.611
323,987
259
-------
Table 3.5-3
Solid Waste Incineration Emission Factors
(1)
Residential
Commercial/
Institutional
1 Industrial
Oh- Site Incineration
Open Burning
Qn-Site Incineration
Open Burning
On-Site Incineration
Open Burning
Emission Factors
(2)
Part.
7
Ib/ton
37
Ib/ton
7
Ib/ton
37
Ib/ton
C3)
SOx
2.5
Ib/ton
2.5
Ib/ton
2.5
Ib/ton
2.5
Ib/ton
(4)
CO
10
Ib/ton
MA
10
Ib/ton
NA
00
HC *
ce:
NC *
'«
*These pollutants have been excluded from this analysis because they are
to be treated on an AQCR basis.
260
-------
Table 3.5-4
Solid Waste Incineration Bnissions
Allocated to Subcounty Areas
A. County Fulton
B. Year "
1975
C. Allocation Order
(1)
Sub-areas
10 - CBD
11 - Northeast
12 - Northwest
13 - Southeast
14 - Southwest
15 - Tri-Cities
17 - Buckhead
.
SUBAREA TOTAL
Residual
D. COUNTY TOTAL
missions
(tons/yr)
(2)
Part.
501
1,019
1,876
1,264
1,097
959
268
6,984
791
7,775
(3)
SOx
73
108
164
113
98
89
33
678
70
748
(4)
CO
195
194
184
138
116
117
73
1,017
80
1,097
(5)
HC
(6)
X0x
261
-------
Table 3.1-1
Population-Based Allocation Proportions for Subcounty Areas
Fulton
A. County
B. Year _
C. Allocation Order
198(
(1)
Subareas
Atlanta
Fairburn
Hapeville
Rosswell
Union City
East Point
College Park
SUBAREA TOTAL
Residual
D. COUNTY TOTAL
(2)
Population
422,915
6,839
10,021
14,682
12,733
48,226
24,565
.
539,981
129,964
669,945
(3)
Allocation Proportion
.631
.010
.015
.022
.019
.072
.037
.8060
.194
1.0
Residual is equal to the COUNTY TOTAL (row D, column [2]) minus the
sum of the population accounted for by all specified subcounty areas.
RP TPOP
N
Z POP-
where:
RP - Residual population not accounted for
by specified subareas
TPOP COUNTY TOTAL (row D, column [2])
POP. - Population in each specified subcounty
area i.
262
-------
Table 3.3-3
Commercial/Institutional Employment-Based
Allocation Proportions for Subcounty Areas
Fulton
A. County
B. Year '
C. Allocation Order
19
(2)
(3)
Subarea
10 - CBD
11 • Northeast
12 - Northwest
13 -.Southeast
14 - Southwest
15 - Tri-Cities
17 - Buckhead
SUBAREA TOTAL
Residual
COUNTY 'TOTAL
Commercial/
Institutional
Employment
48,305
38,352
26,261
20,663
17,329
19,790
17,804
188,494
16,470
204,964
Allocation Proportion
.236
.187
.128
.101
.085
.096
.087
.920
.080
1.0
D.
263
-------
A. County
B. Year '_
C. Allocation Order
Table 3.5-1
Manufacturing Employment -Based
Allocation Proportions for Subcounty Areas
Fulton
1981)
(1)
Subareas
10 - CBD
11 - Northeast
12 - Northwest
13 - Southeast
14 - Southwest
15 - Tri-Cities
17 - Buckhead
SUBAREA TOTAL
Residual
COUNTY TOTAL
(2)
Industrial
Land Use
132
675
1,852
1,165
1,082
868
167
5,941
1,042
6,983
(3)
Allocation Proportion
.019
.097
.265
.167
.155
.124
.024
.851
.149
1.0
D.
264
-------
Table 3.5-2
Annual Solid Waste Incineration
A. County FultOr
B. Year
C. Allocation Order
(1)
Subareas
10 - CBD
11 - Northeast
12 - Northwest
13 - Southeast
14 - Southwest
15 - Tri-Cities
17 - Buckhead
SUBAREA TOTAL
Residual
D. ODIWTY TOTAL
Annual Solid Waste Incineration by Source
(Tons/yr)
Residential
."M
,— J
Cr.-Site
L—in.
(3)
Open
Burning
Commercial/Institutional
(4)
On- Site
Incin.
40,407
32,017
21,916
17,292
14,553
16,437
14,896
157,518
13.697
171,215
(S)
Open
Burning
14,142
11,206
7,670
6,052
5,094
5,753
5,214
55,131
4.794
59,925
Industrial
C6)
On-Site
Incin.
1.282
6,543
17,877
11.266
10,456
8,365
1,619
57,408
10.051
67,459
Ci
Oper.
Burr.ir.g
6.605
33.717
92,114
58.049
53.878
43,102
8,342
295.807
51 r 792
347,599
265
-------
Table 3.5-3
Solid Waste Incineration Bnission Factors
(1)
Residential
Conmercial/
Institutional
Industrial
On- Site Incineration
Open Burning
On- Site Incineration
Open Burning
Qn-Site Incineration
Open Burning
Emission Factors
(2)
Part.
7
Ib/ton
37
Ib/ton
7
Ib/ton
37
Ib/ton
(3)
S°x
2.5
Ib/ton
2.5
Ib/ton
2.5
Ib/ton
2.5
Ib/ton
(4)
GO
10
Ib/ton
m
10
Ib/ton
NA
(5)
HC*
(6)
NOX*
*These pollutants have been excluded from this analysis because they are
to be treated on an AQCR basis.
266
-------
Table 3.5-4
Solid Waste Incineration Emissions
Allocated to Subcounty Areas
Fulton
A. County
B. Year '
C. Allocation Order
1980
(1)
Sub-areas
10 - CBD
11 - Northeast
12 - Northwest
13 - Southeast
14 - Southwest
15 - Tri-Cities
17 - Buckhead
SUBAREA TOTAL
Residual
D. COUNTY TOTAL
missions
(tons/yr)
(2)
Part.
529
966
1,985
1,286
1,179
991
308
7,244
1,130
8,374
(3)
S0x
78
104
175
116
105
92
38
708
100
808
(4)
CO
208
193
199
143
125
124
82
1,074
119
1,193
(s:
HC
(6)
N0x
267
-------
Table 3.1-1
Population-Based Allocation Proportions for Subcounty Areas
A. County Fulton
B. Year 1985
C. Allocation Order
(1)
Subareas
Atlanta
Fairburn
Hapeville
Ros swell
Union City
East Point
Cqllege Park
SUB AREA TOTAL
Residual
D. COUNTY TOTAL
(2)
Population
439,832
9,096
9,821
19,380
16,298
47,940
26,039
568,406
188,632
757,038
(3)
Allocation Proportion
. .581
.012
.013
.026
.022
.063
.034
.751
.249
1.0
Residual is equal to the COUNTY TOTAL (row D, column [2]) minus the
sum of the population accounted for by all specified subcounty areas.
N
RP = TPOP - I POP.
where:
RP - Residual population not accounted for
by specified subareas
TPOP = COUNTY TOTAL (row D, column [2])
POP. » Population in each specified subcounty .
area i.
268
-------
Table 3.3-3
Commercial/Institutional Employment -Based
Allocation Proportions for Subcounty Areas
Fulton
A. County
B. Year '
C. Allocation Order
.198.5
(2)
(3)
Subarea
10 - CBD
11 -Northeast
12 - Northwest
13 - Southeast
14 - Southwest
15 - Tri-Cities
17 - Buckhead
SUBAREA TOTAL
Residual
COUNTY TOTAL
Commercial/
Institutional
Employment
50,925
38,777
29,249
22,046
20,149
22,471
19,877
203,494
23,505
226,999
Allocation Proportion
.224
.171
.129
.097
.089
.099
.087
.896
.104
1.0
D.
269
-------
A. County
B. Year '_
C. Allocation Order
Table 3.5-1
Manufacturing Employment-Based
Allocation Proportions for Subcounty Areas
Fulton
(1)
Subareas
10 - CBD
11 - Northeast
12 - Northwest
13 . Southeast
14 - Southwest
15 - Tri-Cities
17 - Buckhead
SUBAREA TOTAL
Residual
COUNTY TOTAL
(2)
Industrial
Land Use
131
707
1,956
1,198
1,182
912
195
6,281
1,376
7,657
(3)
Allocation Proportion
.017
.092
.256
.156
.154
.119
.026
.820
.18D
1.0
D.
270
-------
Table 3.5-2
Annual Solid Waste Incineration
Fulton
A. County
B. Year "
C. Allocation Order
1985
(1)
Subareas
10 - CBD
11 - Northeast
12 - Northwest
13 - Southeast
14 - Southwest
15 - Tri-Cities
17 - Buckhead
SUBAREA TOTAL
Residual
D. CDIKIY TOTAL
Annual Solid Waste Incineration by Source
CTons/yr)
Residential
(2)
On-Site
Inctn.
(3)
Open
Burning
jonunercial/Institutional
(4)
On-Site
Incin.
42,475
32,425
24,461
18,393
16,877
18,773
16,497
169,901
19,721
189,622
(5)
Open
Burning
14,866
11,349
8,562
6,438
5,907
6,570
5,774
59,466
6,902
66,368
Industrial
C6)
On-Site
Incin.
1,258
6,805
18,937
11,539
11,392
8,802
1,923
60,656
13,315
73,971
n
Oper.
Burnir.g
6,480
35,066
97,575
59,460
58,098
45,357
9,910
312,546
68.608
381,154
271
-------
Table 3.5-3
Solid Waste Incineration Bnission Factors
(1)
Residential
Comnercial/
Institutional
Industrial
On-Site Incineration
Open Burning
On-Site Incineration
Open Burning
On-Site Incineration
Open Burning
Emission Factors
(2)
Part.
7
Ib/ton
37
Ib/ton
7
Ib/ton
37
Ib/ton
(3)
SOx
2.5
Ib/ton
2.5
Ib/ton
2.5
Ib/ton
2.5
Ib/ton
(4)
00
10
Ib/ton
NA
10
Ib/ton
NA
(5)
HC
(6)
N°x
272
-------
Table 3.5-4
Solid Waste Incineration Emissions
Allocated to Subcounty Areas
Fulton
A. County
B. Year "
C. Allocation Order
1985
(1)
Sub- areas
10 - CBD
11 - Northeast
12 - Northwest
13 - Southeast
14 - Southwest
15 - Tri -Cities
17 - Buckhead
SUBAREA TOTAL
Residual
D. COUNTY TOTAL
emissions
(tons/yr)
(2)
Part.
548
996
2,115
1,324
1,294
1,058
355
, 7,690
1,512
9,202
(3)
S0x
81
107
187
120
116
99
43
753
136
889
(4)
CO
219
196
217
150
141
138
92
1,153
165
1,318
(5)
HC
(6}
NCx
273
-------
B.3 Master Gridding
274
-------
Table 4.1
Master Grid Mapping
A. County Fulton
B. Subcounty Area Set Residential. Transportation
(1)
Master Grid
Designation
3739 - 741
3739 . 742
3738 . 741
3738 . 742
3737 . ,41
3737 .- 742
3736 . 743
3744 . ?39
J742 . 741
3742 . 743
3742 . 745
3740 . 739
3740 . ?41
3740 - 743
3740 . 745
(2)
Subcounty Area
Designation
Atlanta
(3)
Fraction of Subcounty
Area, in Master Grid
.003
.003
.003
.003
.003
.003
.013
.174
.013
.013
.005
.013
.013
.013
.005
275
-------
Table 4.1
Master Grid Mapping
A. County Fulton
B. Subcounty Area Set Residential. Transportation
(1)
Master Grid
Designation
3738 . ?39
3738 . ?43
3?38 _ ?45
3?36 . 745
3?44 _ ?33
3744 . ?35
3742 _ 739
3?40 . ,31
3?40 . ?35
3?36 . ?27
3738 . 731
3738 _ 733
3y38 _ 735
3738 _ 737
(2)
Subcounty Area
Designation
Atlanta
(3)
Fraction of Subcounty
Area in Master Grid
.013
.013
.005
.005
.005
.045
.013
.048
.054
.016
.013
.013
.013
.013
276
-------
Table 4.1
Master Grid Mapping
A. County Fulton
B. Subcounty Area Set Residential. Transportation
(1)
Master Grid
Designation
3?36 . ?33
3736 . ?35
3?36 . ,37
3?37 _ 739
3?37 _740
3?36 _ 739
3736 .. 740
3736 „ ?41
3736 . ?42
3734_739
3734 _ ?41
3734 _ ?43
3734 - 745
3734.737
3?32 _739
(2)
Subcounty Area
Designation
Atlanta
i
!
i
(3)
Fraction of Subcounty
Area- in Master Grid
.013
.013
.013
.003
.003
.003
.003
.003
.003
.013
.013
.013
.005
.013
.009
277
-------
Table 4.1
Master Grid Mapping
A. County Fulton
B. Subcounty Area Set Residential. Transportation
(1)
Master Grid
Designation
3732 - 7«
3732 ?43
3?32 . 745
3?30 . ?39
3730 . ?41
3730 . ?43
3730 . ?45
3728 . ,41
3728 ,43
3?28 . ?45
3?36 . .,31
3732 . ?27
3732 . ?31
3?34 . 735
3?28 . 727
(2)
Subcounty Area
Designation
Atlij
inta
(3)
Fraction of Subcounty
Area, in Master Grid
.013
.013
.005
.009
.011
.013
.005
.011
.013
.005
.013
.017
.044
.013
.035
278
-------
Table 4.1
Master Grid Mapping
A. County Fulton
B. Subcounty Area Set Residential. Transportation
(1)
Master Grid
Designation
373° - 731
3?48 _ ?35
3724> „ 727
3730 _ ?33
3730 _ ?35
3730 _ 737
3?28 . ?39
3726 . ?41
3726 _ 743
3?26 . 745
3710.717
3710 „ 725
3?18_717
3718_ ?25
3?28 _ 739
(2)
Subcounty Area
Designation
Atlanta
Fairburn
Fairburn
Fairburn
Fairburn
Hapeville
(3) 1
Fraction of Subcounty 1
Area, in Master Grid
.013
.031
.007
.007
.003
.003
.008
.010
.013
.005
.563
.219
.156
.062
.250 1
279
-------
Table 4.1
Master Grid Mapping
A. County Fulton
B. Subcounty Area Set Residential. Transportation
(1)
Master Grid
Designation
3726 . ^9
3726 . 741
3728 . 741
3764 . ?41
3718 . 725
3710 . 725
3724 . ?31
3724 _ ?33
3726 . 731
3726 . 733
3728 . 731
3728 . 733
3728 . 735
T^Zo 7*^'
3728 . 739
(2)
Subcounty Area
Designation
Hapeville
Hapeville
Hapeville
Ros swell
Union City
Union City
East
Point
(3)
Fraction of Subcounty
Area in Master Grid
.350
.300
.100
1.00
.742
.258
.060
.020
.090
.090
.020
.110
.110
.110
.050
280
-------
Table 4.1
Master Grid Mapping
A. County Fulton
B. Subcounty Area Set Residential. Transportation
(1)
Master Grid
Designation
3?26 . 737
3?30 . 733
3730 . ?35
3730 . 737
3730 . 739
3722 . 733
3722 . 735
3724 . 733
3724 . ?35
3726 . ?33
3726 . 733
3726 . 737
' • • -s*
(2)
Subcounty Area
Designation
East
Point
College. Park
1
Fraction of Subcounty
Area in Master Grid
.020
.070
.100
.100
.050
.098
.098
.196
.137 1
.098
.235
.137
281
-------
Table 4.1
Master Grid Mapping
A. County Fulton
B. Subcounty Area Set Residential. Transportation
(1)
Master Grid
Designation
37io . 7oi
3710 _ 709
3710 . 717
3710 . 725
3?10 _ ?33
3718 . 701
3718 _ ?09
3718 _ 717
3718 _ 725
3718 _ ?33
3726 - 79
3726- 717
3726 . 725
(2)
Subcounty Area
Designation
Residual
(3)
Fraction of Subcounty
Area ..in Master Grid
.058
.061
.050
.038
.012
.028
.055
.060
.029
.012
.006
.049
.012
282
-------
Table 4.1
Master Grid Mapping
A. County Fulton
B. Subcounty Area Set Resident j.alr Transportation
(1)
Master Grid
Designation
J732 . ?23
3736 . 723
3740 . 727
J752 . 735
3752 . 739
3758 . ?41
3758 . 749
3764 . 733
3764 - 741
3758 . 757
3764 . ,49
3764 - 757 j
3?64 . 76S
3772.733
3772 - 741
(2)
Subcounty Area
Designation
Residual
(3)
Fraction of Subcounty 1
Area, in Master Grid
.013
.002
.002
.007
.046
.043
.028
.009
.047
.006
.061
.040
.015
.009
.052
283
-------
Table 4.1
Master Grid Mapping
A. County Fulton
B. Subcounty Area Set Residential. Transportation
(1)
Master Grid
Designation
3772 - 749
3772 . 757
3780 . ?41
3?80 . 749
J744 . ?39
3748 . ?35
3736 . 727
3732 - 731
3732 - 727
3788 . 727
3724 . ?27
3726 . 731
3?24 . 731
3724 - 733
3?22 . 733
(2)
Subcounty Area
Designation
Residual
(3)
Fraction of Subcounty
Area, in Master Grid
.049
.009
.015
.022
.005
.002
.009
.003
.010
.006
.014
.001
.002
.001
.002
284
-------
Table 4.1
Master Grid Mapping
A. County Fulton
B. Suboounty Area Set Industrial
(1)
Muter Grid
Designation
3739 - 741
3739 . ?42
J738 . 741
J738 . 742
3737 . ?41
3?37 . ,42
3736 . 743
3744 - 739
3T42 - 741
3742 . 743
3742 - 745
3740 . ,39
3?40 . ,41
3740 - 743
J740 . ,45
(2)
Subcounty Area
Designation
10-CBD
n-m
(?)
Fraction of Subcounty
Area in Master Grid
.170
.149
.191
.106
.191
.149
.044
.090
.073
.122
.039
.073
.122
.122
.039
285
-------
Table 4.1
Master Grid Mapping
A. County Fulton
B. Subcounty Area Set Industrial
(1)
Master Grid
Designation
3738 . 739
3739 _ 741
3739 _ 742
3738 _ 742
3738 _ ?43
3738 . ?45
3737 . ?42
3736 _ 743
3736 _ 745
3744 _ 733
3?44 _ 735
3744 _ ?39
3742 - 739 ;
3742 _ 741
3740 _ ,27
(2)
Subcounty Area
Designation
11-NE
12-NW
(3)
Fraction of Subcounty
Area : in Master Grid
.013
.013
.020
.020
.122
.041
.013
.056
.022
.023
.104
.064
.050
.025
.037
286
-------
Table 4.1
Master Grid Mapping
A. County Fulton
B. Subcounty Area Set
(1)
Master Grid
Designation
v*0-?1
3740 . 735
3740 . 739
J736 . ,27
3738 . ,31
3?38 . 733
3738 . 735
3738 . ,37
3738 . 739
3736 . ?33
3?36 . 735
3736 . 737
3737.739
3737.740
3737 - 741
(2)
Subcounty Area
Designation
12-NW
•
(3)
Fraction of Subcounty
Area in Master Grid
.191
.207
.025
.012
.021
.047
.052
.052
.047
.008
.012
.009
.004
.004
.001
287
-------
Table 4.1
Master Grid Mapping
A. County Fulton
B. Subcounty Area Set Industrial
(1)
Master Grid
Designation
3738 . ?41
3739 . 741
3?36 . 739
J736 . 740
3?36 . 741
3?36 . 742
3?36 _ ?43
3736 _ 745
3734 . ?39
37s4 - 741
J734 . ,43
3734 . 74S
3734 . 737
3?32 . 737
3732 . 739
(2)
Subcounty Area
Designation
12-NW
12-NW
13-SE
(3)
Fraction of Subcounty
Area: in Master Grid
.004
.001
.002
.010
.015
.015
.030
.012
.035
.061
.061
.024
.002
.012
.061
288
-------
Table 4.1
Master Grid Mapping
A. County Fulton
B. Subcounty Area Set Industrial
(1)
Master Grid
Designation
3732- 741
J732 . 743
3732 . 745
3730 . ,37
3730 . 739
3730 . 741
3730 . 743
3730 . 74S
J728 , 739
3728 . ?41
3728 . ,43
3728 . ?45
3726 . ?41
3726.743
3726 . 745
(2)
Subcounty Area
Designation
13-SE
(3)
Fraction of Subcounty
Area: in Master Grid
.061
.061
.026
.005
.049
.061
.061
.026
.033
.055
.061
.026
.049
.061
.027 1
289
-------
Table 4.1
Master Grid Mapping
A. County Fulton
B. Subcounty Area Set Industrial
(1)
Master Grid
Designation
3?36 . ?23
3?36 _ ?27
3738 _ ?31
3?38 _ 733
3?36 . ,31
3?36 . ?33
3736 _ ?35
3?36 . ?37
3737 . ?39
3737 „ ,40
3736 . ?39
3?36 „ ?40
3?32 _ ?23
3?32 _ ?27
3732 _ ?31
(2)
Subcounty Area
Designation
14-SW
(3)
Fraction of Subcounty
Area, in Master Grid
.022
.130
.025
.004
.036
.030
.029
.031
.008
.008
.009
.003
.004
.125
.143
290
-------
Table 4.1
Master Grid Mapping
A. County Fulton
B. Subcounty Area Set Industrial
(1)
Muter Grid
Designation
3734-735
3734 . ?37
3734 . 739
3732 „ ,35
3732 „ ?37
3728 . ?27
3730 „ 731
3730 _ ?33
3?30 _ ?35
3?30 . 737
3728 _ 731
3?28 _ ?33
3?26 _ 731
3?24 . ?27
3732 _ 735
(2)
Subcounty Area
Designation
14-SW
15-TC
(3)
Fraction of Subcounty
Area in Master Grid
.036
.035
.011
.032
.029
.115
.036
.014
.006
.004
.033
.002
.006
.036
.008
291
-------
Table 4.1
Master Grid Mapping
A. County Fulton
B. Subcounty Area Set Industrial
(1)
Master Grid
Designation
3?30 . ?33
3730 . ?35
3?30 _ 737
3?30 _ 739
3?28 _ 731
3?28 . ?33
3728 . 735
3728 _ ?37
3728 . ?39
3728 _ ,41
3726 . ?31
3726 _ 733
3726 . ?35
3y26 _ ?37
3726 _ ?39
(2)
Subcounty Area
Designation
15-TC
(3)
Fraction of Subcounty
Area in Master Grid
.040
.054
.050
.013
.005
.005
.066
.066
.031
.007
.056
.066
.066
.066
.066
292
-------
Table 4.1
Master Grid Mapping
A. County Fulton
B. Subcounty Area Set Industri;
(1)
Master Grid
Designation
3?26 _ 741
3724 . 727
3?24 . 731
3724 . 733
3?24 _ ?35
3722 . ?31
3722 - 733
3722 - 735
3752 _ 735
3752 _ 739
3748 . 735
3744_735
3744 - 739
(2)
Subcounty Area
Designation
15-TC
17-B
(3)
Fraction of Subcounty
Area , in Master Grid
.013
.048
.066
.066
.042
.033
.041
.021
.060
.241
.120
.075
.504
293
-------
Table 4.1
Master Grid Mapping
A. County Fulton
B. Subcounty Area Set Industrial
(1)
Master Grid
Designation
37io . 7oi
3710 . ,09
3710 ,_ ?17
3?10 _ ?25
3?10 _ ?33
3?18 _ ?01
3?18 _ y09
3718 . ?17
3?18 „ ?25
3?18 _ 733
3726 _ ?09
3726 _ ?17
3726 _ ?25
3734 . y17
3?34 _ ,25
(2)
Subcounty Area
Designation
16 - S. Fulton
(3)
Fraction of Subcounty
Area in Master Grid
.108
.114
.102
.080
.023
.051
.102
.114
.097
.028
.011
.091
.040
.017
.023
294
-------
Table 4.1
Master Grid Mapping
A. County Fulton
B. Subcounty Area Set Industrii
(1)
Muter Grid
Designation
3? 50 . ?33
37SO . 741
3758 . 741
3758 . ?49
3?64 . ?33
3764 . ?41
3?64 . ?49
3764 - 757
3758 . 757
3764 . 733
3764 . ?41
3?64 . ?49
3?64 . 757
3764 . 765
3772 . 733
(2)
Subcounty Area
Designation
18 - Sandy Spgs.
19 - N. Fulton
I
(3)
Fraction of Subcounty
Area , in Master Grid
.065
.081
.226
.145
.048
.274
.145
.016
.023
.023
.034
.126
.149
.057
.034
295
-------
Table 4.1
Master Grid Mapping
A. County Fulton
B. Subcounty Area Set Industrial
(1)
Muter Grid
Designation
3772 - 741
3?72 . ?49
3772 . 757
3780 _ ?41
3?80 . ,49
(2)
Subcounty Area
Designation
19 - N.
Fulton
(3)
Fraction of Subcounty
Area in Master Grid
.195
.184
.034
.057
.080
296
-------
Table 4.1
Master Grid Mapping
A. County Fulton
B. Subcounty Area Set Conrnercial/Institutional-SQlid Waste
CD
Master Grid
Designation
3739 - 741
3739_742
3738 _ ,41
3?38 _ 742
3737 - 741
3737-_ ^2
3?36 „ ?43
3744 _ ,39
3742 _ 741
3742. ,43
3742 . 745
3?40 . ?39
3?40 . ?41
3740 . 743
3?40. ?45
(2)
Subcounty Area
Designation
10-CBD
11-NE
(3)
Fraction of Subcounty
Area, in Master Grid
.170
.149
.191
.106
.191
.149
.044
.090
.073
.122 1
.039
.073
.122
.122
.039 1
297
-------
Table 4.1
Master Grid Mapping
A. County Fulton
B. Subcounty Area Set Commercial/Institutional-Solid Waste
(1)
Master Grid
Designation
3T38 - T59
3739 . 741
3739 . 742
3738 _ ?42
3738 . 743
3738 -. ,45
3?37 . ,42
3?36 . 743
3736 „ 745
3744 _ 733
3744 . 735
3?44 . 739
3742 „ 739
3742 . 741
3740 . ?27
(2)
Subcounty Area
Designation
11-NE
12-NW
(3)
Fraction of Subcounty
Area, in Master Grid
.013
.013
.020
.020
.122
.041
.013
.056
.022
.023
.104
.064
.050
.025
.037
298
-------
Table 4.1
Master Grid Mapping
A. County Fulton
B. Subcounty Area Set Coimiercial/Institutional-Solid Waste
(1)
Master Grid
Designation
J740 . fl
3740 . 735
3740 . ?39
3736 . 727
3738 . jSL
3?38 _ ?33
3738 _ ?35
3738 . 737
3?38 . ?39
3736 _ ?33
3736 . ?35
3736 . 737
3737 _ y39
3737.740
3737 . 741
(2)
Subcounty Area
Designation
12-NW
(3)
Fraction o£ Subcounty
Area, in Master Grid
.191
.207
.025
.012
.021
.047
.052
.052
.047
.008
.012
.009
.004
.004
.001 1
299
-------
Table 4.1
Master Grid Mapping
A. County Fulton
B. Subcounty Area Set. Commercial/Institutional-Solid Waste
(1)
Master Grid
Designation
3738 . ?41
3?39 _ 741
3736 _ 739
3736 . 740
3736 _ ,41
3736- _ 742
3?36 _ ?43
3736 _ 745
3734 _ 739
3734 . 741
3734 . 743
3734 . 745
3734 . 737
3732 . 737
3732 _ 739
(2)
Subcounty Area
Designation
12-NW
12-NW
13-SE
(3)
Fraction of Subcounty
Area, in Master Grid
.004
.001
.002 .-.
.010
.015
.015
.030
.012
.035
.061
.061
.024
.002
.012
.061
300
-------
Table 4.1
Master Grid Mapping
A. County Fulton
B. Subcounty Area Set Coinnercial/Institutional-Solid Waste
(1)
Master Grid
Designation
3?32 . ,41
3732 . ?43
3732 „ 745
3?30 . ?37
3730 _ 739
3730-_ 741
3730 . ?43
3730 . ?45
3?28 . ?39
3728 _ 741
3728 . ?43
3?28 _ 74S
3726 _ ?41
3726_743
3726 . 745
(2)
Subcounty Area
Designation
13-SE
(3) 1
Fraction of Subcounty
Area, in Master Grid
,061
.061
.026
.005
.049
.061
.061
.026
.033
.055
.061
.026 1
.049
.061
.027 1
301
-------
Table 4.1
Master Grid Mapping
A. County Fulton
B. Subcounty Area Set Comnercial/Institutional-Solid Waste
(1)
Master Grid
Designation
3?36 . ?23
3?36 _ ?27
3738 . 731
3738 . ?33
3736 . ?31
3736 _ ?33
3736 . 735
3?36 . 737
3737 _ ?39
3737 _ 740
3?36 . 739
3736 „ 740
3732 _ ,23
3732 „ 727
3732 . ?31
(2)
Subcounty Area
Designation
14-SW
(3)
Fraction of Subcounty
Area, in Master Grid
.022
.130
.025
.004
.036
.030
.029
.031
.008
.008
.009
.003
.004
.125
.143
302
-------
Table 4.1
Master Grid Mapping
A. County Fulton
B. Subcounty Area Set Comercial/Institutional-SoHd Waste
(1)
Muter Grid
Designation
3?34 . ?35
3734-737
3?34 _ ?39
3732 . 735
3?32 . 737
3728- . ?27
3730. ,31
3730 . 733
3730 - 735
3730 . 737
3728 _ ?31
3?28 _ ?33
3?26 _ ?31
3?24 . 727
3732 _ 735
(2)
Subcounty Area
Designation
14-SW
15-TC
(3)
Fraction of Subcounty
Area, in Master Grid
.036
.035
.011
.032
.029
.115
.036
.014
.006
.004
.033
.002
.006
.036
.008 1
303
-------
Table 4.1
Master Grid Mapping
A. County Fulton
B. Subcounty Area Set Comnercial/Institutional-Solid Waste
(1)
Master Grid
Designation
373° - 733
3730 . ?35
3730 - 737
3730 . ?39
3728 . ?31
3728 - 733
3?28 . 735
3728 - 737
3728 ?39
3728 . ?41
3726 . 731
3726 . 733
3726 . 735
3726 . 737
3726 . 739
(2)
Subcounty Area
Designation
15-TC
'•
(3)
Fraction of Subcounty
Area, in Master Grid
.040
.054
.050
.013
.005
.005
.066
.066
.031
.007
.056
.066
.066
.066
.066
304
-------
Table 4.1
Master Grid Mapping
A. County Fulton
B. Subcounty Area Set Coirmercial/Institutional-Soiid Waste
(1)
Master Grid
Designation
3726 - 741
3724 . 727
3724 . ?31
3724 _ 733
3724 _ 735
3722._ ,31
3?22 . ?33
3722 - 735
3?52 _ 735
3752 . ?39
3748 . ?35
3744 . ?35
3744 _ 739
(2)
Subcounty Area
Designation
15-TC
17-B
(3)
Fraction of Subcounty
Area, in Master Grid
.013
.048
.066
.066
.042
.033
.041
.021
.060
.241
.120
.075
.504
305
-------
Table 4.1
Master Grid Mapping
A. County Fulton
B. Subcounty Area Set Coninercial/Institutional-Solid Waste
(1)
Master Grid
Designation
3710 - 7W
3?10 . ?09
3710 . ?17
3710 . ?25
3710 . ?33
3718 . 701
3718 . ?09
3718 . ,17
3?18 . ?25
3?18 . 733
3726 . ?09
3?26 . 717
3726 . 72S
3734 . ?17
3?34 . 725
(2)
Subcounty Area
Designation
Residual
(3)
Fraction of Subcounty
Area, in Master Grid
.058
.061
.055
.043
.012
.028
.055
.061
.052
.015
.006
.049
.022
.009
.012
306
-------
Table 4.1
Master Grid Mapping
A. County Fulton
B. Subcounty Area Set Comei-cial/Institutional-Solid Waste
(1)
Muter Grid
Designation
37SO _ ^3
3750 . 741
3758 . 741
3758 . ?49
3764 _ ?33
3764. . ?41
3764 - 749
3764 . 757
3758 . 757
3764 . ?33
3764 . ,41
3764 . 749
3764 . ?57
3764 . 765
3772 . ,33
(2)
Subcounty Area
Designation
Residual
I
(3)
Fraction of Subcounty
Area, in Master Grid
.012
.015
.043
.028
.009
.052
.028
.003
.006
.006
.009
.034
.040
.015
. 009
307
-------
Table 4.1
Master Grid Mapping
A. County Fulton
B. Subcounty Area Set Conrnercial/Institutional-Solid Waste
(1)
Master Grid
Designation
3772 - 741
3?72 _ 749
<3772 „ ?57
3780 . 741
3780 _ ,49
(2)
Subcounty Area
Designation
Residual
(3)
Fraction of Subcounty
Area, in Master Grid
.052
.049
.009
.015
.022
308
-------
B.4 Master Grid Emissions
309
-------
A. County
B. Year 1970
Table 4.2
Kbster Grid Emissions
(13
Master Grid
Designation
1. 3710- 701
2. 3710 - 709
3. 3710 - 717
4. 3710- 725
5. 3710 - 733
6. 3718 - 701
7. 3718 - 709
8. 3718 - 717
9. 3718 - 725
10. 3718 - 733
11. 3726 TO9
12. 3726 717
13. 37Z& - 725
14. 3734 - 717
15. 3734 - 725
Emissions
(tons/yr)
(2)
Part.
82.5
87.0
80.9
63.2
17.4
39.4
78.2
87.8
75.2
20.9
8.4
69.6
29.4
11.5
15.5
(3)
SOx
15.3
16.0
18.1
13.9
3.2
7.4
14.5
17.0
14.8
3.3
1.6
13.0
3.9
.7
1.0
(4)
CO
1344.3
1413.8
1604.2
1281.1
278.3
648.7
1274.7
1514.0
1379.5
279.3
139.1
1135.7
281.7
3.5
4.8
(5)
HC
(6)
Wx
310
-------
A. County Flllton
B. Year iy/u
Table 4.2
Kbster Grid Emissions
(1)
Master Grid
Designation
16. 3722- 731
17. 3722- 733
18. 3722- 735
19. 3724- 727
20. 3724- 731
21. 3724- 733
22. 3724- 735
23. 3726- 731
24. 37 26- 733
25. 3726. 735
26. 3726. 737
2?> 3726. 739
28. 37 «>- 7^
29. 37 26- 743
30. 37 26- 74S
Emissions
(tons/yr)
(2)
Part.
55.1
66.4
33.9
118.8
101.2
104.8
66.8
99.0
109.7
105.3
105.1
107.9
97.7
90.1
39.2
(3)
SOx
22.2
23.5
11.1
34.0
33.6
34.6
21.9
37.4
42.2
34.7
35.9
42.0
26.5
15.7
6.6
(4)
CO
687.5
621.0
345.1
1249.0
53.9
716.0
484.1
1055.7
1376.0
829.5
714.9
993.9
2168.6
1718.3
661.5
(5)
HC
(6)
^x
311
-------
A. County Fulton
B. Year 1970
Table 4.2
tester Grid Emissions
(1)
^Master Grid
Designation
31. 3728 - 727
32. 3728 - 731
33. 3728 - 733
34. 3728 - 735
35. 3728 - 737
36. 3728 - 739
37. 3728- 741
38. 37 28 - 743
39. 37zy- 745
40. 373°- 731
41. 373U - 7-"
42. 3730 - 735
43. 3730- 737
44. 3730- 739
45. 3730- 741
Emissions
(tons/yr)
(2)
Part.
148.3
44.1
18.2
109.4
109.4
105.7
93.3
90.1
37.9
47.8
86.5
98.8
97.3
94.9
88.6
(3)
SOx
29.8
8.4
13.0
43.5
43.5
35.5
19.9
15.7
6.5
9.8
31.3
38.6
37.1
23.1
14.9
(4)
CO
4748.0
232.5
1253.8
1261.3
1261.3
2334.0
1737.0
1718.3
661.4
1711.9
1723.5
1540.6
1540.8
1761.9
1455.6
(5)
HC
(6)
^x
312
-------
Table 4.2
Mister Grid Emissions
A. County Fulton
B. Year 1970
(1)
Master Grid
Designation
46. 3730- 743
47. 3730-U745
48. 3732- 723
49. 3732 - 727
50. 37 32 - 731
51. 3732 - 735
52. 3732 - 737
53. 37 32 - 739
54. 3732 - 741
55. 3732 - 743
56. 5752- 745
57. 3734 - 735
58. 3734 . 737
59. 3734 - 739
60. 5734- 741
Emissions
(tons/yr)
(2)
Part.
90.1
37.9
6.2
146.2
184.3
46.0
46.5
87.1
90.1
90.1
37.9
47.8
49.3
67.4
90.1
(3)
SOx
15.7
11.5
2.9
24.0
36.6
7.9
5.4
14.0
15.7
15.7
6.4
9.8
10.0
12.6
15.7
(4)
CO
1718.3
661.4
296.8
2476.3
5865.2
5.0
5.8
1192.9
1718.3
1718.3
661.4
1711.9
1712.2
1715.1
1718.3
(5)
HC
$
(6)
""x
313
-------
A. County Fulton
B. Year 1970
Table 4.2
fester Grid Emissions
(1)
Nfaster Grid
Designation
61. 3734 - 743
62. 3734 - 745
63. 3736 - 723
64. 3736 - 727
65. 37 36 - 731
66. 3736 - 733
67. 3736 - 735
68. 3736 - 737
69. 3736 - 739
70. 3736 . 740
71 3736 . 741
•
72. 3736 . 742
73. 3736 - 743
74. 3736 - 745
75. 3737 - 739
Emissions
(tons/yr)
(2)
Part.
90.1
35.3
23.5
270.3
47.8
121.1
159.9
132.2
14.3
18.5
22.0
22.0
651.2
184.1
50.5
(3)
SOx
15.7
6.1
3.0
43.5
9.8
21.1
28.3
23.9
2.7
3.4
3.8
3.8
162.8
31.4
8.7
(4)
CO
1718.3
661.0
48.4
2325.3
1711.9
1712.9
1713.6
1713.2
395.5
396.2
396.7
396.7
2203.5
847.1
395.9
(5)
HC
(6)
>°x
314
-------
Table 4.2
Mister Grid Emissions
A. County
B. Year 1970
(1)
Master Grid
Designation
.26. 3737- 740
77. 3737 - 741
78. 3737 - 742
79. 3738 - 731
80. 3738 - 733
81. 3738 - 735
82. 3738 - 737
83. 3738 - 739
84. 37*> - 741
85. 3738 . 742
86. 37**: 7<"
87. 37'« - 7^
gg. 3739 - 741
89. 3739 - T42
90. 3740 - 727
Emissions
(tons/yr)
(2)
Part.
50.5
806.3
719.0
245.4
482.4
'527.9
527.9
575.5
836.3
592.6
922.6
306.9
816.3
771.4
369.1
(3)
SOx
8.7
361.8
297.4
42.5
82.1
89.8
89.8
97.8
366.7
225.4
157.2
51.0
338.5
306.1
60.4
(4)
CO
395.9
443.1
543.4
1715.0.
1717.8
1718.3
1718.3
1828.6
443.8
592.3
2751.8
351.0
549.0
603.3
53.4
(5)
HC
(6)
>°x
1
315
-------
A. County Fulton
B. Year . 1970
Table 4.2
tester Grid Emissions
(1)
Master Grid
Designation
91. 3740- 731
92. 37 4°- 73S
93. 374°- 739
94. 3740- 741
95. 3740 - 743
„, ,,40 -45
yo. 3/ 7
97. 3742 - 739
98. 3742 - 7^1
99. 3742 - 743
LOO. 374Z- 745
L01. 3744- 733
L02. 3744 - 735
L03. 3744- 739
.04. 3748- 735
.05. 3752 . 735
Emissions
(tons/yr)
(2)
Part.
1939.1
2103.1
805.1
922.6
922.6
295.6
508.1
805.1
922.6
295.6
233.0
1093.1
1571.9
54.4
16.7
(3)
S0*
329.9
358.3
136.9
157.2
157.2
50.6
86.5
136.9
157.2
50.6
39.4
193.9
318.4
20.2
4.6
(4)
CO
6344.4
7135.8
2337.7
2751.8
2751.8
990.5
1718.0
2337.7
2751.8
990.5
661.6
6594.8
23790.2
4126.4
164.3
(5)
HC
(6)
^x
316
-------
Table 4.2
Mister Grid Emissions
A. County Fulton
B. Year 1970
(1)
Master Grid
Designation
106. 37 52- 739
107. 37 50- 733
108. 37 50- 741
109. 37 58- 733
110.3758. 741
111. 37 S8- 749
112. 37 58- 757
113. 37 64- 733
114.3764- 741
115. 37 e4- ?49
116. 3764- 757
117. 37 <*- 70*
118.3772- 733
119. 37 72- 741
120. 37 72- 749
Emissions
(tons/yr)
(2)
Part.
69.6
5.6
7.0
0
26.8
17.. 5
3.7
8.4
46.3
38. S
26.3
9.3
5.6
32.4
30.5
(3)
^x
21.8
.6
.7
0
10.1
6.6
1.4
2.4
23.9
14.3
9.4
3.5
2.1
12.2
11.5
(4)
CO
1067.4'
.6
.7
0
982.2
639.5
137.1
205.8
2650.0
1393.3
913.7
342.6
205.5
1187.7
1119.2
(5)
HC
(6)
*>x
317
-------
A. County Fulton
B. Year 1970
Table 4.2
Khster Grid Emissions
(1)
Master Grid
Designation
mi**t <& tj i
. 3/ 7
122. 378° - 741
123. 378° - 749
37 - 7
37 - 7
37-7
3? - 7
37 - 7
37 - 7
37 - 7
37-7
37 - 7
37 - 7
37-7
37-7
Emissions
(tons/yr)
(2)
Part.
5.6
9.3
13.7
(3)
SOx
2.1
3.5
5.2
(4)
CO
205.5
342.6
502.5
(5)
HC
.
(6)
«>x
318
-------
Table 4.2
tester Grid Emissions
A. County Pulton
B. Year 1975
(1)
Master Grid
Designation
1. 37 10- 701
2. 37 10- 7 °9
3. 37 10- 717
4. 37 10- 725
5. 37 10- 733
6. 3718- 701
7. 37 18- 7 °9
8. 37 18- .7 I?
9. 37 18- 7 2S
10. 3718- 733
u> 37 26- 7 09
12. 37 26- 7 17
13. 37 26. 7 25
14. 37 34- 7 17
15. 37 34- 7 25
Emissions
(tons/yr)
(2)
Part.
122.9
129.5
119.6
93.8
25.8
58.6
116.1
130.5
111.5
31.0
12.6
103.6
43.5
16.9
22.8
(3)
^x
24.4
25.6
27.6
21.5
5.1
11.7
23.1
27.0
23.0
5.5
2.4
20.6
6.4
1.2
1.6
(4)
CO
1399.6
1472.1
1644.5
1317.6
289.7
675.4
1327.1
1569.1
1417.9
291.3
144.8
1182.4
294.8
5.0
6.7
(5)
HC
(6)
*v
319
-------
A. County Fulton
B. Year 1Q7S
Table 4.2
Kfaster Grid Emissions
(1)
Master Grid
Designation
IS. 3722 - 731
17. 3722 - 733
18. 37 22 - 735
19. 3724- 727
20. 37 24 - 731
21. 3724 - 733
22. 3724 - 735
23. 372*- 731
24. 3726 - 733
25. 3726 ' 735
26. 3'26- ?37
27. 3726- 739
28. 3726 - 741
29. 3726 - 7 43
30. 3726- 745
Emissions
(tons/yr)
(2)
Part.
62.1
75.4
38.7
131.6
114.5
119.2
76.0
111.3
124.1
119.9
119.2
120.8
99.9
89.5
39.1
(3)
SOx
27.0
29.1
13.9
41.5
41.8
43.2
27.4
45.7
51.6
43.2
44.5
50.3
28.6
15.9
6.8
(4)
CO
457.9
497.2
296.2
882.8
56.2
619.2
415.7
712.1
982.4
712.3
570.1
591.9
1284.0
1016.9
391.8
(5)
HC
(6)
™x
320
-------
Table 4.2
Mister Grid Emissions
A. Qounty Fulton
B. Year 1975
(1)
Mister Grid
Designation
31. 37 28- 7 27
32. 37 Z8- 731
33. 37 28- 733
34. 37 28- 7 3S
35. 57 28- 73?
36. 37 28- 7 39
37. 37 28- 741
38. 37 28- 743
39. 3728. 745
40. 57 59- 7 31
41. 5730. 7 33
42. 57 30. 7 35
43. 37 30. 7 37
44. 37 30- 7 39
45. 57 30- 7 41
Emissions
(tons/yr)
(2)
Part.
154.8
47.3
20.1
123.3
123.3
111.7
94.3
89.5
37.8
49.4
95.5
110.4
107.9
97.5
88.1
(3)
SOx
31.3
9.5
15.1
52.9
52.9
40.1
21.1
15.9
6.6
10.1
37.1
46.5
44.6
25.7
15.1
(4)
CO
2863.3
156.3
832.2
840.2
840.2
1423.2
1028.5
1016.9
391.6
1010.1
1077.4
995.7
995.9
1084.9
862.2
(5)
HC
(6)
^x
321
-------
A. County Fulton
B. Year 1975
Table 4.2
fester Grid Emissions
(1)
Master Grid
Designation
A- 37 30- 743
4o. 0/ '
47. 37 30- 745
-- 32 , 23
48. 3/ - 7
49. 3732. 727
50. 3732. 7 31
37 32. 7 35
51. 5/ '
52. 3732. ?37
53. 3732. 739
54> 37 32- 7 41
,- 32. 7 43
55. 3/ '
56. 3732- 745
57 37 34- 7 35
58. 37*- 7"
59. 37 34. 7 39
60. 3734. 7 41
Emissions
(tons/yr)
(2)
Part.
89.5
37.8
7.8
154.3
191.7
49.7
48.3
86.7
89.5
89.5
37.8
49.4
51.0
67.5
89.5
(3)
^x
15.9
6.6
4.3
26.3
38.0
9.2
5.9
14.3
15.9
15.9
6.6
10.1
10.3
12.9
15.9
(4)
CO
1016.9
391.6
307.1
1567.3
3492.2
5.5
6.3
707.6
1016.9
1016.9
391.6
1010.1
1010.4
1013.5
1016.9
(5)
HC
(6)
^x
322
-------
A. County Fulton
B. Year 1975
Table 4.2
tester Grid Bnissions
(1)
faster Grid
Designation
V. 37 34- 743
62. 37 34- 745
63. 37*- 723
64. 37 36- 727
65. 37*- 731
66. 37 36- 7 33
67. 37^- 7 35
68. 37 36- 7 37
69. 37 *>- 739
70. 3736- 74°
71_ 37 36. 7 41
72 37 36- 7 42
73. 37 *• 7 43
74. 37 36- 7 4S
75. » 3?- 7 39
Emissions
(tons/yr)
(2)
Part.
89.5
35.1
25.1
303.4
49.4
138.9
186.0
152.0
14.9
18.7
21.8
21.8
720.0
208.8
59.1
(3)
^x
15.9
6.2
3.4
49.1
10.1
24.7
32.0
26.7
2.8
3.4
3.9
3.9
195.0
38.1
9.9
(4)
CO
1016.9
391.2
50.2
1469.8
1010.1
1011.2
1012.0
1011.5
233.6
234.3
234.9
234.9
1560.5
599.9
234.0
(5)
HC
(6)
^x
323
-------
A. County Fulton
B. Year 1975
Table 4.2
tester Grid Emissions
(1)
Master Grid
Designation
76. -37. 7 40
77. 3737- 741
78. 3737. ?42
79. 37 38- 7 31
80. 3738. 7 33
81. 3738. 7 35
82. 3738. 737
83. 3738- 739
84. S'38- 741
85. 3^8- 742
86. 3738. 743
3738. 745
O / .
37 39 _ 7 41
00 J/ '
OO.
89. 3739- 7 42
90. 57 «- 7"
Emissions
(tons/yr)
(2)
Part.
59.1
834.8
754.4
289.7
579.0
634.6
634.6
781.2
870.9
629.7
1059.7
353.0
761.9
814.6
445.6
(3)
^x
9.9
431.3
355.1
48.7
95.4
104.4
104.4
141.7
437.0
269.6
192.9
63.0
377.2
356.9
71.0
(4)
CO
234.0
285.6
398.3
1013.5
1016.6
1017.3
1017.3
1182.0
286.3
453.5
2175.5
393.3
363.2
465.5
55.3
(5)
HC
(6)
^x
•
324
-------
Table 4.2
Muter Grid Bnissions
A. County
B. Year 1975
(1)
Master Grid
Designation
91. 37 4°- 731
93. 37 4°- 739
94. 37 40- 741
95. 37 40- 743
96. 37 4°- 7«
97. 37 42- 7*>
98. 37 «- 741
„. 3742. 743
37 42. 7 45
100. *' '
101.3744- 733
102.3744- 735
103."'*- 7"
104.3748. 7^5
105. « 5Z- I 3S
Emissions
(tons/yr)
(2)
Part.
2331.3
2528.0
938.4
1059.7
1059.7
339.4
610.6
938.4
1059.7
342.9
280.2
1307.9
1813.9
56.9
19.2
(3)
^x
383.7
416.7
165.2
192.9
192.9
62.0
100.6
165.2
192.9
64.0
45.9
223.6
366.0
21.1
5.8
(4)
CO
3755.9
4223.5
1711.3
2175.5
2175.5 '
760.7
1016.8
1711.3
2175.5
1147.3
392.0
3896.9
14495.0
2454.8
170.5
(5)
HC
(6)
^x
•
325
-------
Table 4.2
tester Grid Bnissions
A. County Fulton
1975
(1)
Master Grid
Designation
106. 37 52 - 7 39
107. 37 50- 7 33
,-50 41
108 37-7
-.58 7 33
109 37 - 7
,7 58 7 41
110. 37 - 7
,7 58 7 49
111. 37 7
113. 3764- 7 33
,7 64 7 41
114. 5/ " '
,7 64 7 49
115. J/ " '
37 64. 7 57
116. *' '
3764- 7 65
119. 37 "- 7 «
Emissions
(tons/yr)
(2)
Part.
81.2
9.7
12.1
0.0
45.5
29.6
6.3
14.3
73.5
65.3
44.7
15.9
9.5
55.0
51.8
(3)
*>x
28.4
1.1
1.4
0.0
16.3
10.6
2.2
3.9
37.2
23.2
15.5
5.7
3.7
19.7
18.6
(4)
CO
1106.4
1.1
1.4
0.0
1018.0
662.9
142.1
213.6
2555.6
1444.2
947.3
355.1
213.3
1231.0
1160.1
(5)
HC
(6)
™x
326
-------
A. County Fulton
B. Year 1975
Table 4.2
tester Grid Emissions
(1)
Master Grid
Designation
-V7 72 7 57
121. ->' " '
„ 80_ - 41
122. 37-7
123. 37 «°- 7 49
Emissions
(tons/yr)
(2)
Part.
9.5
15.9
5.6
(3)
3.7
5.7
6.4
(4)
CO
213.3
355.1
518.8
(5)
HC
(6)
1'
327
-------
A. County Fulton
B. Year 1980
Table 4.2
Grid Bnissions
(1)
Master Grid
Designation
1. 37 10- 701
2. 37 10- 7°9
3. 37 10- 717
4. 37 10- 725
5> 37 10- 7 33
-17 IB. 7 01
6. 3/ 7
37 18. 7 09
/ •
8> 37 18- 7 17
37 18. 7 25
y •
u. 3726. 7 09
17 37 26- 7 17
-L£ •
37 26- 7 25
X O •
14. 37 34- 7 "
15. 37 34- 7 25
Emissions
(tons/yr)
(2)
Part.
164.1
173.0
160.7
127.8
34.4
78.4
155.4
174.6
155.5
41.6
16.9
138.5
58.5
23.0
30.8
(3)
SOx
31.1
32.7
35.5
28.3
6.5
15.0
29.5
34.5
32.4
7.0
3.2
26.2
8.3
1.7
2.3
(4)
CO
755.6
794.9
934.0
851.6
156.5
364.4
716.5
859.9
1128.9
158.6
78.1
638.4
163.5
6.8
9.1
(5)
HC
(6)
^x
328
-------
A. County Fulton
B. Year 1980
Table 4.2
ffester Grid Emissions
(1)
Master Grid
Designation
16. *722- 731
17. 3722 - 733
18. 3722- 735
19. 3724- 727
20. 37 24- 731
21. 37 24 - 733
22. 3724- 735
23. 3726- 731
24. 37 Z6- 7"
25. 37Zb- 7*b
26. 37*°- 737
27. 37 '&- 73y
28. 37'°- 741
29. 37 26_ 743
30 57 26- 745
Emissions
(tons/yr)
(2)
Part.
70.2
86.1
44.5
146.1
129.6
136.3
87.1
125.5
141.0
137.4
135.8
136,2
104.8
91.2
39.8
(3)
^x
32.5
35.6
17.2
49.5
51.0
53.1
33.7
54.7
62.4
151.5
"54.4
60.0
31.3
16.5
7.0
(4)
CO
221.6
286.0
183.2
409.1
34.1
382.2
258.0
346.4
514.8
441.6
333.7
273.6
559.6
430.0
166.2
(5)
HC
(6)
^x
1
329
-------
A. County Fulton
B. Year 1980
Table 4.2
Jfester Grid Bnissions
(1)
Master Grid
Designation
31. 3728 - 7 27
32. 3728 - 7 31
33. 3728 - 7 33
34. 3728 - 7 35
35. 3728 - 7 37
36. 3728- 739
37. 37Z8- 741
38. 3728 . 7 43
39. 3728 - 7 45
40. 3730 - 7 31
41. 3730 - 7 33
42. 3730 - 7 35
43. 373U - 7 *'
44. 37*. 7^
45. 37^U- 7^
Emissions
(tons/yr)
(2)
Part.
164.1
51.4
22.6
139.4
139.4
124.1
97.4
•91.2
38.5
52.2
106.4
124.4
121.0
102.4
89.8
(3)
^x
32.8
11.0
17.5
63.6
63.6
45.9
22.6
16.5
6.8
10.5
43.8
55.4
53.1
28.7
15.7
(4)
CO
1214.8
80.8
398.4
406.9
406.9
637.5
441.2
430.0
165.9
422.9
485.6
466.4
466.5
481.7
365.8
(5)
HC
(6)
^x
•
330
-------
Table 4.2
tester Grid Bnissions
A. County
B. Year 1980
(1)
Master Grid
Designation
46. 373°- ?43
47. 3730. 7 45
48. 37 32- 7 23
49. 37 32- 727
50. 37 32- 731
51. 37 32- 735
52. 37 32- 737
53. 37 32- 739
54. 37 32- 741
55. 3732. 7 43
56. 37 32- 7«
57. 37 34- 735
58. 37 M- 7 *'
"54 39
59. 37 - 7 iy
60. 37 34- 7 41
Emissions
(tons/yr)
(2)
Part.
91.2
38.5
8.7
165.1
203.1
54.1
51.0
88.5
91.2
91.2
38.5
52.2
53.7
69.3
91.2
(3)
SOx
16.5
6.8
5.2
28.1
39.4
10.6
6.3
14.9
16.5
16.5
6.8
10.5
10.7
13.2
16.5
(4)
CO
430.0
165.9
160.3
687.2
1471.1
5.9
6.8
301.5
430.0
430.0
165.9
422.9
423.1
426.4
430.0
(5)
HC
(6)
^x
331
-------
Table 4.2
Mister Grid Emissions
A. County Fulton
loan
(1)
Master Grid
Designation
61. 3734. 743
62. 3734. 7 45
63. 3736. 723
64. 3736. 727
65. 37 36- 731
66. 37 36- 733
67. 37 36- 735
68. 3736. 7 37
69. 3736. 739
70. 37 36. 7 40
71. 37 36- 7 41
72. 37 *>- 7 4Z
73. 37 36. 7 43
74. 37 36- 7 45
75. 37 37- 7 39
Emissions
(tons/yr)
(2)
Part.
91.2
35.8
27.0
345.7
52.2
162.2
219.6
178.1
15.6
19.2
22.4
22.4
856.3
243.3
70.3
(3)
SOx
16.5
6.4
3.7
55.5
10.5
28.0
37.1
30.5
2.9
3.6
4.0
4.0
238.0
44.2
11.6
(4)
CO
430.0
165.6
27.9
646.6
422.9
424.0
425.0
424.4
98.1
98.1
99.5
99.5
1078.7
254.5
98.6
(5)
HC
(6)
™x
332
-------
A. County Fulton
B. Year 1Qfin
Table 4.2
tester Grid Emissions
(1)
Master Grid
Designation
76. 37 37- 740
,7 37 - 41
77. 37-7
,7 37 7 42
78. 37 - 7
•z7 38 7 31
79. 37-7
80. 37^8. 733
81. 37 38. 7 35
82. 3738- 73?
83. 37 38^ 7 39
84. 3738- 741
85. 373fL 742
37 38. 7 43
86. *' '
37 38. 7 45
87. *' '
88. 3? 39' 7 41
89. 37 39. 7 42
90. 37 40- 7 27
Emissions
(tons/yr)
(2)
Part.
70.3
1008.6
910.2
346.7
702.3
770.8
770.8
831.8
1052.6
759.1
1269.0
423.5
1033.8
982.5
542.8
(3)
^x
11.6
525.8
433.3
57.3
114.3
125.2
125.2
138.5
532.5
329.2
238.3
78.3
493.1
446.7
85.9
(4)
CO
98.6
154.8
290.7
426.7
430.2
431.0
431.0
578.5
155.6
256.8
1815.2
469.7
297.3
371.0
34.1
(5)
HC
(6)
^x
333
-------
A. County Fulton
B- Year 1980
Table 4.2
fester Grid Emissions
(1)
Master Grid
Designation
91. 37 40- 731
•57 40 7 35
92. 37-7
37 40 7 39
93. 37-7
T7 40 7 41
94. 37 - 7
,„ 40 43
95. 3/ * 7
96. 37 4°- 745
97. 37 42- 739
98. 57 42- 74*
3?4Z. ?43
99. ' '
,742_ 7 45
100. •*' '
__ 44 _ 35
101. 3/ • 7
44 _ - jy
102. *' '
37 48 _ 7 35
103.
,7 48 7 35
104. 57 - 7
105. 37 52- 735
Emissions
(tons/yr)
(2)
Part.
2831.5
3069.9
1129.2
1272.4
1269.0
406.2
741.5
1129.2
1269.0
406.2
371.3
1552.1
2064.4
61.7
22.0
(3)
^x
459.9
499.1
202.4
240.4
238.3
76.6
120.5
202.4
238.3
76.6
73.9
246.9
413.8
22.2
6.8
(4)
CO
1591.0
1787.8
1260.4
1975.8
1815.2
607.4
430.4
1260.4
1815.2
607.4
1612.1
194.9
6728.1
1032.5
92.0
(5)
HC
(6)
^x
334
-------
Table 4.2
tester Grid Bnissions
A. County Fulton
B. Year i960
(1)
Master Grid
Designation
37 52. 7 39
106. •*' '
50_ 33
107. 37 7
-- 50 41
108. 37-7
-- i>8 - ^
109. 37-7 a
-7 b« - 4i
110. 37-7
111. 37 58- 7«9
112.3758. 757
113. 37 64- 7 33
114. 57 M, 7 41
115. 57*^.: 7 «.
116. 37 M- 7 b/
*7 04 7 Ob
117.
T-j 1 L 7 ^>^
118.
-------
A. County Fulton
B. Year 1Qgn
Table 4.2
Master Grid finissions
(1)
.>tister Gr'i
Designation
121. 3772- 757
122.3780- 741
,*
123.3780. 749
Emissions
(tons/yr)
(2)
Part.
13.1
21.8
31.9
(3)
^x
4.4
7.3
10.6
(4)
CO
111.7
186.2
273.2
(5)
HC
(6)
*v
336
-------
Table 4.2
Jfester Grid Emissions
A. County
B. Year
(ID
Master Grid
Designation
i. 37!° - 701
2. 3710 - 709
3. 3710- 717
4. 3710- 725
5. 3710- 733
6. 3718 - 701
7. 3718- 709
8. 3718- 717
9. 3718 - 725
10. 3718 - 733
11. 37*>- 7uy
12. 3726 - ill
13. 37^ - 7"
14. 3734 - 717
15. 3734- 725
Emissions
(tons/yr)
(2)
Part.
217.7
229.3
212.5
168.4
45.7
104.1
206.1
231.2
203.1
54.9
22.4
183.6
76.9
29,8
40.0
(3)
S0*
45.1
47.5
50.8
40.3
9.4
21,7
42.9
49.9
44.7
10.1
4.7
38.2
11.8
2.2
3.1
(4)
CO
861.0
905.7
989.5
867.2
178.4
415.1
816.3
959.0
1066.2
181.1
89.0
727.3
187.7
9.0
12.2
(5)
HC
(6)
^x
flfe
<<
.
337
-------
A. County Fulton
B. Year 1985
Table 4.2
Mister Grid Bnissions
(1)
faster Grid
Designation
16. 5722 - 731
17. 3722- T33
18. 3722 - T35
19. 5724 - 727
20. 3724 - 731
21. 3724 733
22. 3724 - T35'
23. 57Z6 - 731
24. 37Z& - 733
25. 57Zb - 73b
26. 5726 - 737
27. 5726 - 73y
28. 5?26 - 74*
29. 3726 - T43
30. 5726 - T45
Emissions
(tons/yr)
(2)
Part.
78.2
96.5
49.6
164.7
146.3
152.8
97.3
140.1
157.2
153.6
152.1
152.3
171.0
94.1
41.2
(3)
^x
157.6
41.4
19.9
58.8
59.9
61.6
39.0
62.8
71.4
61.5
63.0
68.7
33.8
17.1
7.3
(4)
CO
144.9
202.2
124.2
356.9
42.3
267.8
176.5
233.7
340.7
301.5
227.7
176.3
361.8
286.0
110.8
(5)
HC
(6)
MX
338
-------
A. County Fulton
B. Year 1985
Table 4.2
tester Grid Bnissions
(1)
Master Grid
Designation
31. 3728- 727
32. 3728- 731
33. 3728 - 733
34. 3728 - 735
35. 3728 - 737
36. 3728- 739
37. 3728- 741
38. 37^B- 7™
39. 37Z8- 74b
40. 37™- 751
41. 3730- 733
42. 3730- 735
43. 37™- 7"
44. 373°- 739
45. 3730- 741
Emissions
(tons/yr)
(2)
Part.
178.5
56.5
23.8
155.6
155.6
129.5
101.8
94.1
41.7
56.4
117.8
138.1
133.7
107.8
92.8
(3)
SOx
36.0
12.3
18.9
72,9
72.9
50.9
24.4
17.1
9.9
11.1
49.9
63.1
60.3
31.2
16.3
(4)
CO
834.9
52.5
253.8
267.0
267.0
411.9
290.4
286.0
156.8
278.1
318.4
305.1
305.1
317.0
244.1
(5)
HC
(6)
K>x
• - - ,
•
339
-------
A. Cbunty Fulton
B. Year 1985
Table 4.2
tester Grid Emissions
(1)
Master Grid
Designation
46. 373°- 743
47. 3730- 745
48. 3732- 723
49. 3732- 727
50. 3732- 731
51. 3732 - 735
52. 373Z- 76/
53. 3732 - 739
54. 3732 - 741
55. 37'z- 7™
56. 57"- 7«
57. 37°*- 703
58. 3734- 737
59. 3734- 739
60. 37 34- 741
Emissions
(tons/yr)
(2)
Part.
94.1
39.7
11.5
181.5
220.2
59.9
55.2
91.4
94.1
94.1
39.7
46.4
57.9
63.4
94.1
(3)
SOx
17.1
7.1
7.5
32.1
42.6
12.1
6.9
15.4
17.1
17.1
7.1
11.1
11.4
14.0
17.1
(4)
CO
286.0
110.6
180.7
515.2
986.5
7.1
7.5
202.2
286.0
286.0
110.6
278.1
278.4
281.9
286.0
(5)
HC
(6)
^x
340
-------
A. County Fulton
B. Year 1985
Table 4.2
Mister Grid Emissions
(1)
Master Grid
Designation
61. 3734 - T43
62. 3734 - T45
63. 3T36 - T23 .
64. 3736 - T27
65. 3736 - 731
66. 3T36 - T33
67. 3T36 - T35
68. 3T36 - T37
69. 3750 - T59
70. 37>° - f u
71. 3T36 - 741
72. 3?30 - f
73. 3750 - 7*3
74. sr50 - 74b
75. 3T37 - T39
Emissions
(tons/yr)
(2)
Part.
94.1
36.9
29.9
396.2
56.4
187.9
256.4
206.7
16,7
20.0
23,0
23.0
1013.3
306.6
82.3
(3)
^x
17.1
6.7
4.5
65.3
11.1
32.4
43.5
35.5
3.1
3.7
4.2
4.2
287.5
57.6
13.7
(4)
GO
286.0
110.1
31.4
484.7
278.1
279.5
280.4
279.8
64.7
65.5
66.2
66,2
1047.9
406.4
65.2
(5)
HC
(6)
^x
F
1
•
341
-------
A. County Fulton
B. Year 1985
Table 4.2
Mister Grid Emissions
(1)
Master Grid
Designation
76. 3737- 740
77. 3737 - 741
78. 3737- 742
79. 3738 - 731
80. 37 38 - 733
81. 3738 - 735
82. 37**- 7"
83. 37 ™ - 7^y
84. 3738 - 741
85. 37**- 7*"
86. 37-50- 7«
87. 37 ^ - 74b
88. 3739 - 7^1
89. 37 39 - 742
90. 37 40- 727
Emissions
(tons/yr)
(2)
Part.
82.3
1219.6
1097.4
408.0
833,4
915.3
915,3
987.4
1271.8
913.1
1503,6
502.3
1246.9
1183.2
645.9
(3)
SOx
13.7
641,2
528.3
68.1
136.8
150.1
150.1
166.2
649.4
401.2
287.7
94.9
601.1
544.6
104.0
(4)
CO
65.2
125.7
286.8
282.4
286.1
287.0
287.0
460.6
126.6
367.0
1915.6
552.3
293.9
381.1
38.2
(5)
HC
(6)
*°x
342
-------
Table 4.2
Master Grid Emissions
A. County Fulton
B. Year 1985
(1)
Master Grid
Designation
91. 3740 - 731
92. 3740- T35
93. 374° - T39
94. 374° - 741
95. 37™ - /'
96. 37™ - 7W
97. 37~42 - 739
98. 374Z - 741
99. 374Z - 743
100. 374Z - T45
101. 3744 . 733
102. 3744 - 735
103. 37™ - 7™
104. 3748 - 735
105. 37 52 - 735
Emissions
(tons/yr)
(2)
Part.
3362.0
3655.0
1339.0
1503.6
1503.6
481.2
880.4
1339.0
1503.6
481.2
404,3
1875.5
2531.3
67.8
26.2
(3)
SOx
551.5
598.7
244.0
287.7
287.7
92.3
144.6
244.0
287.7
92.3
66.1
316.5
503.3
24.0
8.5
(4)
CO
1059.1
1189.3
1262.7
1915.6
1915.6
630.0
286.4
1262.7
1915.6
630.0
111.2
1084.8
4999.3
690.2
103.8
(5)
HC
(6)
^x
•
343
-------
A. County Fulton
B. Year
Table 4.2
tester Grid Bnissions
(1)
Master Grid
Designation
106. 3752 - 739
107. 3750 - 733
108. 3750 - 741
109. 3758 - 733
110. 375b - 741
111. 37 M - 74y
112. 37bb - 7b7
113. 3764 - 733
114. 37^4 . 741
115. 3764 . 749
116. 37°' - 7*'
117. 37b4 - 705
118. 3772 - 733
119. 37 72 - 741
120. 37 72- 749
Emissions
(tons/yr)
(2)
Part.
113.8
18.5
23.1
0.0
86.7
56.5
12.0
27.4
147.8
124.5
85.2
30.2
18.2
104.8
98.7
(3)
SOx
43.7
2.2
2.7
0.0
30.5
19.8
4,3
7.5
69.3
43.3
28.8
10.7
6.4
36.9
34.7
(4)
CO
664.3
2.3
2.8
0.0
603.8
393,1
84,2
127.5
1594.5
856.6
562.2
210.6
126.4
730.1
688.0
(5)
HC
(6)
^x
344
-------
Table 4.2
Mister Grid Emissions
A. County Fulton
B. Year 1985
(1)
.Master Grid
Designation
121. 3772 - 757
122. 3780- 741
123. 378°- 749
Emissions
(tons/yr)
(2)
Part.
17.2
30.2
44.3
(3)
SOx
6.4
10.7
45.6
(4)
CO
126.4
210.6
308.9
(5)
HC
(6)
*>x
345
-------
Acknowledgments
The Energy and Environmental Systems Division (TEES) of Argonne
National Laboratory extends gratitude to the many individuals and several
organizations that contributed to the successful completion of this document.
Messrs. David C. Sanchez and John Silvasi of the Standards Implementa-
tion Branch, EPA, Durham, North Carolina served as project officers at differ-
ent stages of the study. Their comments and suggestions have contributed
greatly to the document and its integration with other volumes of the series
Guidelines for Air Quality Maintenance Planning and Analysis.
Several state and local agencies contributed financial support and
supplied data for this study and their assistance is sincerely acknowledged.
Special gratitude is extended to the Illinois Institute for Environmental
Quality (IIEQ) for funding previous research efforts dealing with air quality
maintenance that served to develop the foundation for the methodology pre-
sented in this document. Particular thanks is also extended to the Atlanta
Regional Commission (ARC) for supplying data used to test the application of
this methodology on Fulton County, Georgia (Appendices A and B). Members of
the Region IV Office of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency also con-
tributed several helpful suggestions that were integrated in this test case.
We also extend thanks to the many EES staff members who contributed
significantly to the final calculations presented in these appendices.
Mr. Richard R. Cirillo consulted on numerous aspects of the Fulton County
test case. Mr. John F. Tschanz performed initial calculations for the indus-
trial emissions projections. The following individuals assisted in calculat-
ing the results presented here; Mr. Kevin J. Francis, Mr. Richard F. King,
Ms. Dorathea A. Seymour, Mr. Mark A. Sherman, and Mr. James W. Stasiak.
Messrs. Walter W. Clapper and Robert J. Neisius drafted all of the tables
and graphics. Ms. Jo Ann Lawlor typed and proofed all of the tables.
While all of the above were very helpful throughout the project, the
authors alone are accountable for deficiencies of these appendices.
346
-------
TECHNICAL REPORT DATA
(Please read Instructions on the reverse before completing)
1. REPORT NO.
EPA-IAG-D4-0463
2.
3. RECIPIENT'S ACCESSION-NO.
4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE
Guidelines for Air Quality Maintenance Planning and
Analysis, Volume 13: Allocating Projected Bnissions
to Subcounty Areas; Appendices A and B.
6. REPORT DATE
November 1974
6. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE
7. AUTHOR(S)
M. L. Wilkey, T.
8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NO.
E. Baldwin, and S. J. LaBelle
10. PROGRAM ELEMENT NO.
2AC129
9. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS
Energy and Environmental Systems Division
Argonne National Laboratory
9700 South Cass Avenue
Argonne, Illinois 60439
11. CONTRACT/GRANT NO.
EPA-IAG-D4-0463
Project No. 3
12. SPONSORING AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Air and Waste Management
Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards
Research Triangle Park, N.C. 27711
13. TYPE OF REPORT AND PERIOD COVERED
Final
14. SPONSORING AGENCY CODE
15. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES
Part of a 13 volume series.
16. ABSTRACT
Appendices A and B of Volume 13: Allocating Projected Bnissions to Subcounty Areas
illustrate a test of the procedures applied to Pulton County (Atlanta) Georgia. The
results of this test case demonstrate that the Order 3 procedures yield the most
refined estimates of emissions allocated to subcounty areas and prospective users
are encouraged to employ these procedures wherever the availability of detailed
data and manpower resources permit.
17.
KEY WORDS AND DOCUMENT ANALYSIS
DESCRIPTORS
b.IDENTIFIERS/OPEN ENDED TERMS
c. COSATI Field/Group
Emissions Forecasting and Allocation to
Subcounty Areas Fielt Test
Improving Local Emission Inventories for
Air Quality Maintenance Planning - Field
Test
Air Quality Maintenance
Plans,
Emission Inventories,
Forecasting Emissions,
Subcounty Emissions
Allocation Techniques
13-B
18. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT
Unlimited
19. SECURITY CLASS (This Report)
Unclassified
21. NO. OF PAGES
20. SECURITY CLASS {TMspagej
Unclassified
22. PRICE
EPA Form 2220-1 (9-73)
36?
------- |