WORKING PAPER NO.  39
            COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN PROJECT
      FOR WATER SUPPLY AND WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT
                TETON COUNTY (IDAHO)
        PRELIMINARY ECONOMIC RECONNAISSANCE
         AND ESTIMATE OF GROWTH, 1960-2010
DATE;  December 14, 1962    DISTRIBUTION;

Prepared by    RLC	    Project Staff
Reviewed by	    Cooperating Agencies

Approved by 	    General 	
 U. S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, EDUCATION AND WELFARE
                Public Health Service
                     Region IX

   Division of Water Supply and Pollution Control
               Room 570 Pittock Block
                 Portland 5, Oregon

-------
this working paper contains  preliminary data and information



primarily intended for internal use by the Columbia River



Basin Project staff and cooperating agencies.   The material



presented in this paper has  not been fully evaluated and



should not be considered as  final.

-------
           TETON COUNTY  (IDAHO)
    PRELIMINARY ECONOMIC RECONNAISSANCE
    AND ESTIMATE OF GROWTH,  1960-2010
             Table of Contents



SUMMARY                                  1

I.  INTRODUCTION                         2

    A.  Purpose of This Analysis         2

    B.  Definition of the Area           2

    C.  Study Period                     2

    D.  Limitations of This Analysis     2

II.  PRESENT ECONOMIC BASE               3

    A.  Population                       3

    B.  Industry                         3

III.  ESTIMATED FUTURE GROWTH            6

    A.  Factors Influencing Future
          Growth                         6

    B.  Future Population                7
Prepared by:  Economic Studies Group
              Water Supply and Pollution
              Control Program, Pa'cific Northwest

              December, 1962

-------
                           TETON COUNTY (IDAHO)                           C-l
                   PRELIMINARY ECONOMIC RECONNAISSANCE
                    AND ESTIMATE OF GROWTH, 1960-2010
SUMMARY

     Teton County, Idaho, had a 1960 population of 2,639.  The main town of

the county, Driggs, contained 824 of these, while two smaller towns con-

tained another 434 persons.  The remaining population was largely settled in

scattered farms.  During the 1950-60 decade, population of the county de-

clined 565 persons, or 17.7 percent.

     Agriculture is the principal economic activity of the region, occupy-

ing 46.5 percent of the 1960 labor force.  Farm consolidation and increased
                                                  i
labor productivity in agriculture are. the principal reasons for declining

population in the area!

     A slowing of the trend to farm consolidation, increased diversification

in agricultural production, and some increase in irrigation* should slow the
                                          *r                    .
                                                         >
decline in agricultural employment in the future.

     Based on the assumptions and limitations which are a part of this pre-

liminary economic reconnaissance, the population of Teton County is forecast

to be substantially unchanged in 1985 and 2010.

-------
I.  INTRODUCTION                                                          C-2




    A.  Purpose of This Analysis




        This analysis is intended to provide a preliminary estimate of the




economic potentials and anticipated growth of the subject area.




    B.  Definition of the Area




        The study area consists of Teton County, Idaho.




    C.  Study Period




        The study period is the 50-year period 1960-2010, with an interim




point at 1985.




    D.  Limitations of This Analysis




        Three limitations apply to this study.  The first is that it is




intended only as a preliminary estimate of the outlook for the subject




area's growth.  Subsequently, in connection with the Columbia River Basin




Project for Water Supply and Water Quality Management, an analysis will be




made on an industry-by-industry basis of the, growth potential in the various




subbasins.  At that time this preliminary estimate will be reviewed and




revised, if necessary.



        The second limitation is that this study is intended for use par-




ticularly in assessing future water needs.  Emphasis has been placed on the




analysis of those industries which make heavy demands upon the water resource.




Other industries have been considered only insofar as they may have a signi-




ficant effect on future population.  For this reason, this study is not sub-




mitted as a detailed industrial forecast.




        The third limitation is one of scope.  The study is oriented to a




specific project and is intended for sizing purposes.  Consideration of inter-




region relationships at a later date may require modification of conclusions.

-------
                                                                           03


II.  PRESENT ECONOMIC BASE


     A.  Population


         Population of Teton County, Idaho at April, 1960, and at the 1940 and


1950 censuses is shown in Table I.
Driggs
Tetonia
Victor
Total Urban
Rural
Total County.
Population
1940
1,040
250 &
294
1,584
2,017
3,601
TABLE I-'
Trends t Teton County^ Idaho
1950
941
232
431
1,604
1,600
3,204
1960
824
194
240
1,258
1,381
2,639
Change
1940 - 1960
-216
- 56
- 54
-326
-636
-962
(-20.8%)
(-22.4%)
(-18.3%)
(-20.6%)
(-31.5%)
(-26.7%)
    I .                  '
         As the table indicates, population of the region has been dropping


 for some time.  In this it follows the national trend toward population


concentration in  urban areas, and falling numbers of rural inhabitants.


         Loss of population has not been even.  The three towns  in Teton
              i '•      '   .  •

County have lost population at a rate less than half that of the unincorpora-
              i

ted area, and as a result  their combined totals have come to represent


roughly half of the number of the county's inhabitants.


     B.  Industry


         Teton County is almost entirely dependent on agriculture, which in


1960 accounted for about 48 percent of total employment and 81 percent of


non-service employment. Table II categorizes major sources of employment in


1950 and 1960.
a/  U. S. Census of Population, 1950, 1960.
b_/  Estimate for comparison purposes.

-------
Employment



ries


:ts
)le goods
Ired prdts

lurable

Lea
LI trade
ass sery.


il serv.
it ion
>rted


rce
TABLE II -1
Trends , Teton County

1950
624
3
3
41
7
4
12
3
1
29
11
108
52
8
48
7
23
30
1,004
•44
1,048
%
labor force
( 59.6)
( .3)
( .3)
( 3.9)
( .7)
( -4)
( 1.1)
( .3)
( .1)
( 2.7)
( 1.0)
( 10.3)
(4.9)
( .8)
( 4.6)
( .7)
( 2.2)
( 2.9)
( 95,8)
( 6.2)
(100.0)
. Idaho


%
1960 labor force
408
3
-0-
26
12
-0-
39
10
-0-
21
11
106
55
13
92
4
34
23
857
25
882
( 46.5)
( .3)
'
( 2.9)
( .1-3).
-
( 27.0)
( 1.1)
-.
( 2.4)
( 1.2)
( 12.0)
( 6.2)
( 1.5)
( 10.4)
( .4)
( 3.9)
( 2.6)
( 97.2),
< 2-8>
(100.0)
C-4
Change
1950-1960
-216 (-34.5%)
-0-
r 3 -
-15 (- 1.4%)
5 ( 71.5%)
- 4
22 (183.0%)
7 (233.0%)
1
- 8 (-36.1%)
rO-
- 2 (- 1.9%)
3 ( 5.8%)
5 ( 62.5%)
44 ( 91.6%)
- 3 (-42,8%)
11 ( 47.8%)
- 7 (-23.3%)
-147 (-14.0%)
j-
-166 (-15.8%)
Agriculture
Forestry & fisheries
Mining
Construction
Mfg:  wood, products
      printing
      other not
Transportation
Cournun. & utilities
Hospitals
Education
Other profess!
Public Administration
Industry not reported

  Total Employed

Unemployed

  Total Labor Force

        The drop in agricultural employment, the chief economic activity of

the area, was considerably sharper than that for. total employment.  Some

categories °f service employment increased in the face of declining population.
                                  I
Food processing employment also rose.  (Driggs contains a creamery, a flour

mill and a grain mill.)  But the decline in agricultural employment was

sufficient to over-ride the effects of these factors, and to 'depress popula-

tion levels.
a/  U. S. Census of Population, 1950, 1960

-------
                                                                           C-5


          Grazing  is  the major agricultural force in the county, and its rela-

 tive  importance has  continued to increase.  Diversion of cropland to pasture

 and Increased  numbers of milk cows, beef cattle, and sheep have been character-

 istic of  the region.  The main crops of the area are grains and hay, though

 increasing  attention to potato culture has occurred with added irrigation

 and with  the growth  of market attendant on the rapid expansion of Idaho's

 potato-processing industry. —   In general, changes in the farm economy have

 been  slow,  and have  taken the path of consolidation of farm ownership, greater

                                      21
 productivity per acre and per worker, — additions tp meat and dairy herds,

 and expansion,  of irrigation, largely through use of ground water on an indi-

 vidual basis.  Table III describes the course of major trends in agriculture.

                                TABLE III ~

                 Agricultural Trends. Teton County. Idaho

                                                                    % Change

                                                                     -13.1
                                                                      16.0
                                                                       8.5
                                                                     -12.0
                                                                      24.2
                                                                       6.1

                                                                      18T5
1949
No . of farms
Average size of farm (acres)
Land irrigated (acres)
Cropland harvested (acres)
Pasture (acres)
Value of crops sold
Value of livestock & pdts
sold


33,
76,
68,
$1,465,

$1,515,
459
432
152
378
146
495
b/
884-'
1959


35,
67,
84,
$1,554,

$1,896,
399
501
972
188
517
798

868

.2




u
.£>,
_!/  Potato harvest in the county rose from 94,978 cwt in 1954 to 163,810 cwt
      in  1959.
2/  Grain production of all types in 1959 amounted to about 1,011 bushels on
      40.7 thousand acres;  in 1954 production was about 1,090 bushels on
      46.8 thousand acres.
a/  U. SiCensus of Agriculture, 1954; 1959.
b/  Includes dairy products of $340,975 in 1949, $554,735 in 1959.

-------
                                                                           C-6






III.  ESTIMATED FUTURE GROWTH




      A.  Factors Influencing Future Growth




          Agriculture is estimated to continue to be the primary pursuit of




the area.  Although over a third of the county lies in Targhee National




Forest, logging conditions do not suggest significant expansion, and saw




mills sufficient to handle Eastern Idaho production have developed in other




areas.  No significant mineral resources are believed to exist in the county.




Teton County is located a sufficient distance from major tourist routes to




preclude development of such recreational resources as it may have.  Develop-




ment of manufacturing industries is highly unlikely in this thinly-populated




rural area, distant from either markets or sources of supply, and with in-




sufficient agricultural output to justify development of appreciable food-




processing units.




          Three significant factors should prpduce some modification-of the




agricultural pattern.  (1)  Increased irrigation should enable the area to




further diversify from the dominant grain cropping pattern.  Increased cattle-




feeding and potato-culture seem likely;  (2)  Further development of Idaho




potato processing, and eventual growth of a meat-packing industry, seem to




offer the conditions for utilizing the potential diversification inherent




in irrigation possibilities;  (3)  Farm consolidation should continue, be-




cause of the economies of scale it offers.  Its effect on employment should




be less severe than in the immediate past, however, because the a.rea is




developing a pattern of specialized share cropping, as a result of the




existence, side-by-side, of dry-farming and irrigated farming, with their




different requirements in technique.  A specialized agricultural labor force

-------
                                                                           C-7






is being developed, too, as farms exceed the optimum size for one-family




cultivation.




          With no non-agricultural sources of growth, and an agricultural




development indicating change within the present frame of the industry rather




than expansion, service activities are unlikely to change to a material




extent.  The area economy is not large enough to support a large service




segment, and the availability of most services at not too-distant Rigby,




Rexburg and Idaho Falls would appear to preclude more than the most modest




growth of service industries within the area.




      B.  Future Population




          The economic potentials do not suggest any expansion of popula-




tion in Teton County, whose population has been dropping since the census




of 1940.




          On the assumptions that increased irrigation and some diversifi-




cation of agricultural production will enable farm employment to remain




constant, and that the population of the region can adequately support the




present level of services, it is forecast for the purposes of this paper




that population will be substantially unchanged in 1985 and 2010.

-------