WORKING PAPER NO.    26
                     COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN PROJECT
             For Water Supply and Water Quality Management
                       COQUILLE RIVER BASIN
   Water Supply and Water Quality Control Reconnaissance Studies
Date;   July 1962                          DISTRIBUTION

Prepared by  WEE.  EK & JEB                 Project Staff_
Reviewed by                               Cooperating Agencies_

Approved by	                       General	
          U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, EDUCATION AND WELFARE
                  Public Health Service
                        Region IX

          Division of Water Supply and Pollution Control
                         570 Pittock Block
                         Portland 5, Oregon

-------
This working paper contains preliminary data and information
primarily intended for internal use by the Columbia River
Basin Project staff and cooperating agencies.  The material
presented in this paper has not been  fully evaluated and
should not be considered as final.

-------
                    COQUILLS RIVER BASIN
Water Supply and Water Quality Control Reconnaissance Studies
INTRODUCTION

This is submitted in accordance with our agreement to supply

the Portland District, Corps of Engineers, with preliminary data

relative to municipal and industrial water supply and stream

quality control considerations associated x*ith reconnaissance

studies being conducted by that agency in the Coquille River

Basin.


The areas and stream reaches of primary concern lie along and

downstream from river mile 30 of the South Fork Coquille River

and along the main stem Coquille River from the confluence of

the North Fork to the mouth at the Pacific Ocean.  Included in

the study, also, because of certain relationships with the

Coquille River Basin, is an adjoining portion of the coastal

region of the Coos River Basin lying to the north.


Studies involve urban developments in Coos County, Oregon with

centers at Powers (pop. 1500); Myrtle Point (pop. 2900); Coquille

(pop. 5000); Bandon (pop. 3900); and Coos Bay Urban Area (pop.

23,000).  All of these areas utilize surface waters for water

supply either impounded or as naturally flowing with the exception

that a portion of the industrial supply in the Coos Bay region

is taken from a newly developed ground supply located in the

-------
Coastal sand dunes area.  All areas use downstream or adjacent



waters for the disposal of municipal and industrial wastes.






PRESENT WATER SUPPLY



It is estimated that at the present time, about 2,200 acre-feet



of water (excluding uses for logging operations) are used



annually for major municipal and industrial (M&I) supply purposes



in the Coquille River Basin and that about 11,000 acre-feet  are



used for these purposes annually in the Coos Bay area.   Essentially



all of this water with the exception of about 1700 acre-feet



taken from the dunes supply is obtained from surface sources of



which about 400 acre-feet are taken annually from the South  Fork



Coquille River and Bingham Creek Watershed (Powers), 600 acre-



feet from the North Fork (Myrtle Point), 700 acre-feet from  the



main stem Coquille River and Rink Creek Watershed (Coquille),



500 acre-feet from Ferry Creek and Springs (Bandon) and 9,300



acre-feet from Pony Creek Watershed and miscellaneous sources



(Coos Bay, North Bend, Uastside, Englewood, Empire, Bunker Hill



and Charleston area).






Seasonal M&I water use estimates indicate that approximately 50



percent of the annual demand in the Coquille Basin occurs during



the months of June through September and that with full exercise



of water rights for logging (3,800 acre-feet annually), a total



of 2,400 acre-feet of water would be used during this period.

-------
From a review of water rights for M&I purposes,  it appears that



applications and certificates totaling more than 50,000 acre-



feet annually are in existence in the Coquiile River Basin.  In



the absence of analyses of priorities or apportionments of possible



shortages among these and rights for other purposes, it is



estimated that on a June-September use basis,  rights at Powers



are essentially fully exercised; at Myrtle Point about 60 percent



exercised; and at Coquiile and Bandon about 10-15 percent



exercised.






From an examination of stream gaging records and estimates of



minimum natural yields in the M&I use areas of the Coquiile



Basin, it appears that ample water is available  in all localities



to satisfy the full exercise of M&I and logging  rights.






M&I water use in the Coos Bay area during the maximum use months



of June through September is estimated to be about 3,700 acre-



feet (excluding water taken from the dunes supply for industrial



purposes) or about 30 percent of that assigned to the area by



right applications and M&I water use certificates.  A comprehensive



study, however, would be required in this area as well as in



several areas in the Coquiile Basin to determine more exactly



to what extent waters assigned by the various rights could be



feasibly developed for future use.  Such factors as development



costs, dependable yields, quality, and ownership< may be



significantly limiting in this regard.

-------
FUTURE WATER SUPPLY



The major water supplies in Coos County as previously enumerated



serve approximately 36,500 persons, 1,050 commercial establish-



ments and about 80 industries varying in kind from bottling com-



panies to pulp mills.  According to economic base studies and



growth forecasts prepared by this office (study report attached)



for Coos County, the urban populations will have increased to



about 61,000 by the year 1980 and to 121,000 by the year 2010.



The major source of growth is expected to be attributable to a



severe increase in the conversion of waste wood materials to



pulp and paper.  It is also expected, due to such factors as



deep water port facilities, water supply and waste disposal



factors, railroad facilities and location relative to large



timber holdings of Georgia Pacific and Weyerhaeuser Corporations



that the expansion of manufacturing will occur around the Coos



Bay area.  Production of pulp and paper in the order of 1,000



tons per day by the year 1980 and 2,000 tons per day by the



year 2000 is believed possible.  (Present production in the



area is about 200 tons per day.)






Economic expansion in the Coquille River Basin is expected to be



at a slower rate than in the Coos Bay area; however, some spill-



over of economic growth front Coos Bay is likely to benefit



Coquille River Basin development.

-------
In addition to the anticipated expansion in pulp and paper



manufacturing, the timber resource is expected to support



additional production of lumber and wood products.  Not only



the timber in Coos County, but also that in the northern part



of Curry County is likely to be processed in cities in the



Coquille or Coos River Basins.  Other factors which may provide



some future growth and further diversification of the economy



include tourist-oriented activities along the coast and in the



national forests; and minerals, among which are titanium-bearing



sands.






It is estimated that by the years 1980 and 2010, respectively,



61,300 and 121,300 persons will be served by major water supply



systems in the Coquille and Coos Bay region.  Inasmuch as national



trends indicate year by year increases in per capita demands for



M&I water, it is expected that the average annual per capita



demands exclusive of that for pulp and paper manufacturing in



the Coquille and Coos Bay region will range according to area



between 125 and 215 gallons per capita per day (gpcd) by the



year 1980 and between 185 and 285 gpcd by the year 2010.  Assuming



that pulp and paper manufacture would be accomplished by the Kraft



(sulfate) process, it is estimated (based on a typical pulp and



paper plant located in a water-short area) that 53,000 gallons of



water would be required per ton of pulp produced.






Total annual water supply requirements by the years 1980 and 2010



for the Coquille and Coos Bay region based on the projected

-------
populations, per capita demands and the pulp and paper production

anticipated are estimated to be about 71,500 acre-feet and 152,000

acre-feet for these years, respectively.  The tabulation to follow

shows a breakdown of these requirements by areas within the study

region.

             Coos Bay and Coquille River Basins
                M&I Water Supply Requirements
Location

Powers
Myrtle Point
Coquille
Bandon
Coos Bay Area
  Pulp & Paper

Totals
Powers
Myrtle Point
Coquille
Bandon
Coos Bay Area
  Pulp & Paper

Totals
Powers
Myrtle Point
Coquille
Bandon
Coos Bay Area
  Pulp & Paper

Population
Served
1,500
2,900
5,000
3,900
23,200
m
36,500

2,000
4,100
7,400
4,900
42,900

61,300

2,600
5,300
13,100
5,900
94,400
•
1960
Avg.
eocd
173
174
120
103
134
m

1980
212
213
146
126
163
-

2010
284
285
196
185
220
-

Avg.
MGD
0.26
1.25
0.60
0.40
3.1
6.6
12.21

0.42
0.87
1.08
0.62
7.0
52.5
62.49

0.74
1.51
2.56
1.10
20.8
105.0
                                    Ann.  Avg.
                                     Ac.-ft.
                                     13,145
                                        480
                                        990
                                      1,230
                                        710
                                      8,000
                                     60.000

                                     71,410
                                        850
                                      1,720
                                      2,900
                                      1,260
                                     24,800
                                    120.000
Totals
121,300
131.71
151,530

-------
Assuming that full exercise of existing water right applications




and certificates is permitted, it appears, with the exception of



the community of Powers, that M&I water would be available to



meet future demands in the Coquille River Basin including satis-



faction of demands during maximum use periods.






At Coos Bay, however, future demands associated mainly with pulp



and paper manufacturing will exceed water available both by



rights and dependable yields.  Sources available to the area are



the sand dunes supply located north of Coos Bay (yield - 30 MGD)



and possible development of storage on the North Fork Coquille



River, South Fork Coos River and West Fork of the Millicoma



River.  A thorough engineering study would be required to



determine the relative feasibilities of developing these or



other possible sources in the area as well as to establish



suitable plant sites for water service, waste disposal and



various other operational contingencies.






WATER QUALITY



It is estimated that about 32,000 population equivalents (P.E.'s)



of unstable organic materials are produced per day by the popula-



tions and industries located along the South Fork and upper main



stem of the Coquille River and that over 270,000 P.E.'s per day



are produced in the Coos Bay region.





                            7

-------
Municipal waste treatment works in these regions consist mainly of



primary treatment.  Logging and pulping wastes enter the receiving



waters of these areas essentially untreated.






Inasmuch as the Coquille River and tributaries are important fish-



ing and recreational streams, maintenance of sufficient dissolved



oxygen (D.O.) levels at all times and in all sections of these



streams is highly essential.  It is estimated from an examination



of minimum stream discharge data on the South Fork and main stem



Coquille Rivers that present waste loadings can be received and



assimilated throughout these reaches without incurring serious



depletions in the D.O. resource.  For example, sampling data



collected by the Oregon State Sanitary Authority in 1960 and 1961



show that D.O. levels in the South Fork 0.6 miles north of Powers



rarely fell below 10 parts per million (ppm); and that below Myrtle



Point on only two occasions but of 13 samplings from August 1960



to October 1961 did the level drop to 6.5 ppm (5-6 ppm of D.O.



is generally considered adequate for fish and other aquatic life).






Whereas it is apparent that partial waste treatment accomplishes




satisfactory control of stream quality at the present time and



inasmuch as higher levels of conventional treatment are available



to keep pace with the future increases in wastes expected, augmen-



tation of low flows for maintenance of stream quality in the



Coquille River does not at this time appear warranted.

-------
DISCUSSION



The availability of substantial raw materials together with water



and power development potentials in Coquille and Coos River Basin



areas is expected to greatly influence an expansion of industrial



activity in this region.  As expansion is expected to center



mainly around the manufacture of pulp and paper* large volumes



of water and waste would be involved.






As previously indicated, economic advantages would appear to



favor the Coos Bay area as the location of future pulp and paper



production.  In addition, plant sites located in this area rather



than at interior basin locations would offer opportunities for ocean



disposal of wastes, thereby eliminating possible interference with



fresh water uses and/or users.  For example, to be compatible with



fisheries and recreational uses of the Coquille River, pulp and



paper production by the sulfate pulping process in the Myrtle



Point area with complete biological treatment of wastes would be



limited to less than 100 tons per day.  Greater rates of production



could be permitted, however, in event that stream flow regulation



for quality maintenance were specifically provided.






In view of the probability that pulp and paper production will



take place in the Coos Bay area, it is apparent that water



source development either in lieu of or as supplements to sources



presently in existence will be required.  Because of the large



demands expected and the need for dependability of supply, it is

-------
believed that source development would, by necessity,  consist of




upper watershed storage with conduit transmission to respective




plant sites.






Of equal importance to the physical, hydrologic,  and economic




considerations associated with storage development are considera-




tions of relative water quality,  Such determinations would be




involved in the establishment of storage,  for example, on the West




Fork Millicoma River, South Fork Coos River or North Fork




Coquille River, or at possible Federal multiple-purpose project




reservoir sites.  Water treatment expenditures,  for example,




may outweigh cost differences involved in transporting waters




greater distances.






The data, forecasts, and statements herein presented are based




on limited data and on a very cursory examination of elements




involved in the study area.  Although the  material is  believed




sufficient for reconnaissance purposes, a  complete evaluation




of water supply and quality control benefits associated with




proposed Federal water resource development in the Coquille and




Coos River areas would require thorough comprehensive  study.
                           10

-------