WORKING PAPER NO.  49
           COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN PROJECT
  For Water Supply and Water Quality Management
             NORTH PUGET SOUND AREA
     SKAGIT AND WHATCOM COUNTIES,  WASHINGTON
     ECONOMIC BASE ANALYSIS AND PROJECTION
                   1960 - 2010
                  November 1964
U. S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, EDUCATION, AND WELFARE
              Public Health Service
                    Region IX

 Division of Water Supply and Pollution Control
                570 Pittock Block
                Portland, Oregon 97205

-------
                    WORKING PAPER NO. 49
                COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN PROJECT
       For Water Supply and Water Quality Management
                   NORTH PUGET SOUND AREA
           SKAGIT AND WHATCOM COUNTIES, WASHINGTON
           ECONOMIC BASE ANALYSIS AND PROJECTION
                         1960 - 2010
DATE;  November 1964            DISTRIBUTION;

Prepared by	         Project Staff
Reviewed by 	         Cooperating Agencies

Approved by     ;	         General 	
    U. S0 DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, EDUCATION, AND WELFARE
                  Public Health Service
                        Region IX

      Division of Water Supply and Pollution Control
                     570 Pittock Block
                     Portland 5, Oregon

-------
                         NORTH PUGET SOUND AREA
                 Skagit  and Whatcom Counties,  Washington

                  ECONOMIC BASE ANALYSIS AND PROJECTION
                             1960 - 2010
                            TABLE OF CONTENTS

                                                                    Page

A.   Present Economic  Base and Population	„ ......     1

   .  1.   Industry  and  Employment ...................DO...........     1
     2,   Population...o....0.0 .....o.....	 <>. ... 0...........     8

B»   Projected Economic  Base and Population ....	....<>	     8

     1.   Factors Influencing Future  Growth ...,0o	.'..........     8
     20   Projected Industrial Production	.. ,, ..... ..........    11

         a.  Food  Processing	.....0.0.0    11
         b.  Pulp  ......'.....	    11
         c.  Petroleum Refining .......... ........<>..............    12
         d«  Aluminum  .....o...».»•••••.••....•••...••.•••o«o....    12
         e.  Other Industries ..,..,	    12

     3.   Projected Population	...................    12
                             LIST OF TABLES

-No. and Title

   I.  Employment, by Industry, North Puget Sound Area	    4
  II.  Percentage Distribution of Employment, by Industry	    5
 III.  Principal Manufacturing Establishments	    6
  IV.  Population, by Urban and Rural Areas	..........<>o   10


            U. S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, EDUCATION, AND V7ELFARE
                          Public Health Service
                                Region .IX           •   •

              Division of Vlater Supply and Pollution Control
           :..                 570 Pittock Block
                             Portland, Oregon

-------
     A.  • Present  Economic  3a.se  and  Popu^lsticn




         -• • Ir^ustrv  and  ErapJo-v-Tr^ent




         Skagit and Whatcos   Counties,  referred to in this report as




the North Puget Sound  Area,  are within  the  Seattle Region, Seattle




providing seme of the  specialised commercial  and professional services




for the  area.  The wall-diversified economic  base of the North Puget




Sound Area rests  upon  three.natural resources;   (1)  rich agricultural




land along the Puget Sound littoral,  providing  the material for food




•processing industries; (2) forests, providing materials for lumber,




plywood  and pulp  manufacturing; and (3) the Puget Sound itself, which




provides sea  food for  processing and  supports recreation paid boat-build-




ing incustries a   A fourth  major element in  the  economic base of the




-srea, petroleum refining,  i.s also partly dependent upon the Puget Sound




location,  since the crude  petroleum for the Anacortes refineries is- partly




supplied by tanker, as well  as  by'pipeline  from Canada,




         In the Skagit and lo.atccm   two-county  area, the total labor




force in April 1950 was about 45,000. of whom about 8,900 ware employed




in manufacturing,, Within  the manufacturing group, the iv.du=try with the




largest  employment is  lumber'and wood products  manufacturing, which




includes plywood. Employment in this industry group declined during




the 1950-cO  decide by  c.bout  30  perce.-t, but  it still pi • ricai about




a third  of all manufacturing jobs=   Other types of manufacturing basic




to the araa  arc.   (in  order  of employment); food processing'., petroleum




refining,  and ~ulp and paper manufacturing,.  Data en ev.._:'_o'_~ii~t by




industry are  shcv.-.n in  Table  1.,

-------
          During  the  1950-60  decade,  the'number  of  jobs" in  the  area



 increased by about 4,50CS  The decline  in lumber and  wood  products  jobs was




 just offset by the new employment  at  the three petroleum refineries




 established during the  decade.  Additional growth  in  the other manu-




 facturing categories added to  the diversification  of  the area's




 economy.   Two other major changes in employment during the 1950-60  decade




.followed  well-established'national trends;  agricultural employment declined




 sharply,  and "service"  industries1 enploynsnt increased as a proportion of




 total  employment.  Table 1 shows  the substantial increases.that  occurred




 in employment in education,  professional services, retail  trade,  and




 personal  services.




          The nature  of  the .economic  base of the two-county area  is




 further ravaalad by  Table II,  which  shows the percentage distribution




 of the Icbcr.force,  by  industry,  in  that area compared with the  distri-




 bution in the U., S.,  as  a whole,,   Basic  industries  in  which the North  Puget .




 Sound  Area, specialises  (ioe^,  in  which  the relative portion of the  labor




 force  substantially  exceeds  the national average)  include  the  following:




 agriculture3 forestry and fisheries, lumbar and wood  products, food




 processing, pulp and. paper,  and petroleum refining.  Relatively  high




 employment in certain service  industries (retail  trade and personal




 services) can be attributed  to tourist  and recreation activity.   As for




 the relatively high  employment in construction, education  and  professional




 services, it is  considered  that  these  result  from special local conditions.




 ana are not part of  the basic  erivolovment of the area.

-------
     Table III lists the principal manufacturing establishments in the

two-county area.  The list includes all firms with 20 or more employees,
                                                              •
excluding printing and publishing establishments.  Of the 69 firms

included, 28 are in food processing; 21 in lumber, plywood,and other

wood products; 3 in pulp and paper; 3 in petroleum refining; and 3

in ship or barge construction.  Most of the products of the remaining

11 firms are for the local economy.  Table III, therefore, confirms

the dependence of the area's economy upon-agriculture and. fishing and

the processing of their products, timber-based products (including pulp

and paper), and petroleum refining.

-------
                                •  TABLE I

              EMPLOYMENT, BY INDUSTRY, NORTH PUGET SOUND AREA.
                         (Skagit and What coin Counties)
                                                                            4
Industry

Agriculture
Forestry and fisheries
Mining
Manufacturing, Total
Lumber, wood prod., furn
Primary -f- fabr. metals
Machinery (incl. elec.)
Other durables
Food -processing
Textiles and apparel
Print, publ.
Chemical and allied
Pulp and paper
Petroleum refin. '
Other nori-dur. , and misc
Construction
Transportation
CommunicatioriS , Utilities
Wholesale Trade
Retail Trade
Fin. , Ins . ,R.E. ', Bus. a Rep.
Personal Services—'
Education
Professional & related?*/
Public Administration
Industry not reported
Total, Emp. Civil. Lab. Force
Unemployed
Military
TOTAL LABOR FORCE
April
Skagit
- Co.
2,000
161
21
4-,307
.fix- 1,581
36
358
286
743
12
161
36
1252/
82Gb/
149c/
1,360
- - 484
357
430
2,861
Serv. 754
1,142
'922
1,525
633
257
17,269
1,627
- 165
19,061
1960 Employment
What com
Co.'
2,670
300
24
4,566
1,165
112
120
. 615
1,017
73
317
"> L.
779d/
287e/
57c/
1,927
764
821
732
4,138
• 1,215
1,906
1,902
1,750
861
326
23,902 •
2,163
223
26,288'
Skagit +
Whatcom
Cos .
4,670
461
45
8,873
2,746
148
478
901
1,760 '
85
478
60
904
1,107
- 206
3,287 '
1,248
1,178
1 , 162
• 6,999
1,959
3,048
2,824
3,275
1 ,549
'583
41,171
3,790
388
45,349.
April
1950
Empl.
Skagit
+ What-
coirr
Cos.
6 , 9'02
781
255 .
7,376
3,892
124
230
509
1,469
35
358
39 •
600b_/
-
•12 Oh./
2,448 '
1,335
1,052
962
6,026
1,887
2,104
1,582
2,029
1,386
575
36,700
2,608
301
39,609
Change
in
Empl.
1950- .
I960
two
Cos.
-2,232
.- 320
- 210
+1,497
-1,146
+ 24
+ 248
+ 392
+ 291
+ 50
-f- 120
-1- 21
+ 304
+1,107
+ 86
+ 839
87
+ 126
-' -200-
- 973
82
+ 944
+1,242
+1,246
. + 163
+ ' 8
+4,471
+1,182
+ 87
+5,740
a./ Estimate for .Scott Paper Mill at Anacortes.
b/ Estimate for Shell (55,000 barrels/day) and. Texaco  (45,000 barrels/day)
refineries at Anacortes, assuming a ratio of  122 barrels/day per  employee, which
was the average for the State of Washington in 1960.
£/ Estimat-:j as - a  residual after deducting pulp and paper and petroleum refining from
U.S. censu:; figure for "other non-durables"- group.
G_/ Esrima'ce for' Georgia-Pacific  (formerly Puget Sound  Pulp  ar.d Timber)  plant  az
Beliingham, based  upon "covered  employment" statistics  for  Whatccm  County.
e_/ Estimate for Mobil refinery at Ferndale  (35,000 barrels/day),  assuming  a ratio
of 122 barrels/day par employee, the  State average in  1960.
~L: Ir.cludes private household workers, other  personal  services and  entertainment and
recreation.       '                            *              -.
 £/ Includes hospitals, welfare, religious3 non-profit  organizations, professional  anc
 related.
 v/.•?=-inated.

-------
TABLE II



PERCENTAGE -DISTRIBUTION OF EMPLOYMENT, BY INDUSTRY
NORTH PUGET SOUND AREA (SKAGIT AND WHATCGM COUNTIES)
Industry

Agriculture
Forestry & fisheries
Mining
Manufacturing, Total
Lumber, wood prod. , furn. , fix.
Primary an'd fabricated metals
Machinery (including electric)
Other durables
Food processing.
Textiles and apparel
Printing, publishing
Chemicals and allied
Pulp and paper
Petroleum refining
Other non-durables, and misc.
Construction.
Transportation
Communications, Utilities
Wholesale Trade
Retail Trade ' .
Fin., Insur. , R. E. , Bus. and Repr. Serv.
Personal Services _/
Education
Professional and related ^/
Public Administration
Industry not reported
Total Employed, Civilian Labor' Force
Unemployed
Military
TOTAL LABOR FORCE 	
gkae , t
. April
1950
17.4%
2.0
.6
18.6
9.8
. .3
.6
1.3
' 3.7
.1
.9
.1
+ What comb Go's.
April
1960
10.3%
1.0
.1
19.6
6.1
.3
1.1
2.0
3.9
.2
1.1
• .1 .
1.5 2.0
- s.1 2.4
• .3 ' .4
6.2
3.4
2.7
2.4
15.2
4.8
5.3
4.0
5.1
, 3.5
1.4
92.6
6.6
.8
100.0
7.2
2.8
' 2.6
2.6
15.4
4.3
6.7
6.2
7.2
3.4 .
1.3
90.7
8.4
.9
100.0
U. S.
April
I960
6 . 1%
.1
.9
25.1
1.5
3.6
4.4
4.6
2.6
3.1
1.6
1.2
.7d/
.2d/
1.6d/
5.5
• 3.9
2.5
3.2
13.7
6.2
6.2
4.S
6.0
4.6
3.7
92.5
5.0
2.5
.100.0
a./ Less than .05 per cent.
b/ Includes private household workers, other personal services, and entertain-
ment and recreation.
c/ Includes hospitals, welfare, religious and non-profit organizations, professional
and related.
d7 Estimated from data for 1960 from 1951 Annual Survey of Manufactures, U. S.
Bepr. of Commerce, Nov. 1962.

-------
                            TABLE III

PRINCIPAL MANUFACTURING ESTABLISHMENTS, NORTH PUGET SOUND AREA,-1964
     Manufacturing Establishments in Skagit and Whatcom Counties
         With 20 or more Employees, by S.I..C. Class —'       .
S.I.C.
Class Industry
20 Food Processing



























24 Lumber and Wood
Products












City
Anacortes
Anacortes
Anacortes
Anacortes
Anacortes
Anacortes
Bellingham
Bellingham'
Bellingham
Bellingham
Bellingham
Bellingham
Bellingham
Blaine
Burlington
Burlington
Burlington
Burlington
Ever son
LaConner
LaCormer
Lynden
Lynesn
i>:to Vernon
H-;.. Ver.ion
Mto Vernon
Mt . Yerrton
Mt . Vernon
Anacortes
Anacortes
Bellingham
Bellingham
Bellingham
Bellingham
Bellingham
Bellingham
Bellingham
Bellingham
Concrete
Concrete
Concrete
Concrete
Firm Name
Farwest Fisheries
Fi sherman ' s Pack ' g
Me Dug I e Wagner Dairy
. McGregor Seafoods
Morgan & Morgan
Sebastian & Stuart
Bellingham Baking
Bellingham Canning
Bornstein Seafoods
Bumble Bee Seafoods
Dahl Fish Co0
Hillview Dairy
What com Co. Dairyrusn
Alaska Packers
Cascade Froz. Foods
Natlo Fruit Canning
N. W0 Darigold
Consol. Dairy
Kale Canning
Moore, R. V.
San Juan Is „ Cannery
Breyer Ice Cream
Lynden Berrygrowers
Carnation Co^
Consolidated Dairy
Frigid Food Prod.
Libby;McN.5 & Libby
Stokely VanCamp
Anacortes Veneer
Pioneer Shingle
Brooks Lumber
Haley Int ' 1 Corp.
lit, Baker Plywood
Mt. Shukson Veneer
Oeser Cedar Co.
Robinson Plywood
Washington Loggers
Ritchie Shake Mill
Hum Shingla
LeVaque Co.,
Skagit Veneer
Hornbeck ores.
Product
Fish products
Processed fish
Ice Cream
Fish. packing
Oyster packing
Fish products
Baked products
Canned Salmon
Frozen fish
Fish products .
Frozen fish
Ice Cream
Milk., cheese
Canned salmon
Froz. fruit, veg.
Froz. berries
Oyster stev/
Butter, pov7d, milk
Can. beans, beets
Froz. fish petfood
Can. vegs.
I.Cr. ,froz. fruits
Froz. berries
Evap. milk
Dairy Products
Ficz. berries
Froz,, foods
Froz. berries , vegs.
Plywood
Cedar shakes
Wood products
Treated lumber
Plywood
Plywood
Treated' poles
Plywood
Logging
Cedar Shakes
Cedar shakes
Shakes
- Lumber
Logging
No. of
Enrol ov.
100-249
20-249s
20-49
20-99s
20-49
10-99s
50-99
50-99
20-99s
10-249s
50-99
20-49
100-249
50-249s
50-499s
50-99 .
20-49 .
100-250
50-99'
10-49s
20-49
500-25003
10-249s
50-249s
10-49s
4- 49 9s
100-499s
50-999s
500-999
20-49
50-99
20-49
100-250
20-49
20-49
100-249
20-49
20-49
20-49
10-493
20-49
20-49
                             (Continued)

-------
                                      TABLE IIl, cont'd
S . I . C .
Class Industry







26 Pulp and -Paper


28 Chemicals
29 Petroleum


32 Stone, -Clay &
Glass Prods.




34 .Fabricated Metal


35 . Machinery
37 Transportation
Equipment

City
Deming
Ever son
Hamilton
Hamilton
Mt . Vernon
Sedro-Woolley
Sedro-Woolley
Anacortes •
Bellingham
Bellingham
Anacortes
Anacortes
Anacortes
Ferndale
Bellingham
Bellingham
Bellingham
Concrete
Mt o Yernon
Lynden
Bsllingham
Bellingham
Sumas
Sedro-Woolley
Bellingham-
Bellingham
LaConner
Firm Hame
H.& H. Products-'
Great Western Lumber
Bridge Bros.
Van de Grift Co,
Witco. Co.
Goodyear Nelson
Willis R. & P.
Scott Paper Co.
Ga»Pacific (paper mill)
Ga. Pacific (pulp trail)
N.W. Petrochemical
Shell Oil
Texaco Oil
Mobile Oil
B'ham Bldgs« S.upp.
Lir.d Gravel • '
Permanent e Cement
Lone Star Cement
Mt. V. Sand & Gravel
Whatcom Bldg. Supp,.
Weldcraft Steel
Weldit Tank & Steel
Elebaas Co.
Skagit Corp.
B ' h am Sh ipy ar d s
United Boatbuild'g
Skagit Plastics .
Product
Shakes, shingles
Lumber
Lumber
Logging
Wood decor .access.
Lumber
Wood chips , lumber
Pulp
Tissue papers
Pulp
Phenol, cresol.
Petrol. refining
Petrol. refining
Petrol. refining
Concrete prod.
Concrete prod.
Cement
Cement
Concrete prod.. • .
Pre-cast concrete
Boats , tanks
Barges , tanks
Tanks , mach ' y .
,-ioists, log. mach 'y
Steel barges
Fibreglass boats
Fibreglass boats
No. ot
Employ.
20-49
50-99
20-49
20-49
20-99s
20-49
100-250
100-250
250-499
500-999
10-49s
500-999
250-499
250-49'9
50-99.
20-49
100-249
100-249
50-99
10-49s
10-493
20-49
20-49
250-499
20-499s
50-99
50-99
 ;?l S.IcC. refers to the Standard Industrial Classification system of the U.- S. Census
of Manufactures.  Firms in the printing and publishing classification have been omitted
from the above list, since they are not related to water supply problems, nor are they
part of the "basic" or "export" employment of the area*
s./ The letter "s" after the employment figures indicates that the range given includes
a seasonal variation,.

Source:  Wash. State Dept. of Commerce and Ec0 Development, Directory of Wash. State
Manufactures, July•1964o

-------
                                                                        8



         2.  Population


         The 41,559 jobs (civilian and military) itemized in Table I


supported, as of April 1, 1960, a population of 121,435 in the two-county


area.  Table IV shows the allocation of this population among the cities


and unincorporated parts of the area.  For purposes of analysis, the


sparsely inhabited eastern portions of the two counties have been separated


from the more densely-settled urban and suburban portions along the Sound.


The study area's population'increased by about 11,000 during the 1950-60


decade.  Nearly all of this increase occurred in the relatively densely-


settled western portion of the two counties, most of it in Skagit County.


Areas of notable growth, were Mt. Vernon, Anacortes and Ferndale, the latter two


showing the effects of the establishment there of petroleum refineries.


     B.  Projected1 Economic Base and Population    '       .         •


         1.  Factors Influencing Future Growth


         The future growth of the North Puget Sound Area will depend upon


the further development and exploitation of the same basic resources and


locational advantages that are now the support of the economy.  Of these,


no increase in the total harvest and processing of seafood is anticipated


during the study period.  It is also expected that the total timber harvest
                                                        ^

will remain at about the present level or decline slightly, although


useage will shift away from sawmills to pulp and plywood.  There is a


potential  for increased  agricultural production and, therefore, for a


greater volume of fruit and vegetable processing and preparation of dairy


products.  The petroleum refineries  at Anacortes and Ferndale have a total


capacity equal to about 60 percent of present demand for  gasoline  in the


Pu^et  Sound area.  Projected plants  near Everett would, as assumed  in  the  •

-------
previous Snohomish Basin Study, double this capacity by 1985.




Growth in demand, and the extension of the area supplied to other portions




of the Northwest, beyond the Puget Sound area, would permit further expansion




at Ferndale and Anacortes.

-------
                                                                      10
                              TABLE IV            •     •

   POPULATION,  NORTH PUGET SOUND AREA, BY URBAN AND  RURAL AREAS
                   (Skagit and Whatcom Counties)
.Place or Area
a/
URBAN AND SUBURBAN PORTIONS, TOTAL ~
Skagit County
Communities, Total
Anacortes
Burlington
Hamilton
LaConner
• Lyman ' •
Mt. Vernon
Sedro-Woolley
Suburban
Whatcom County
Communities, Total
Bellingham
Elaine
Ever son
Ferndale
Lynden
Nooksack
Sumas
Suburban •
NON-URBAN AND RURAL PORTIONS TOTAL -/
Skagit County
Community
Concrete
Non-Urban or Rural
Whatcom County
Non-Urban or Rural
TOTAL POPULATION - Two- County area -
April. 1,
1950 .
103,884
40,320
19.064
6,919
2,350
294
594
378
5,230
3.299
21,256
63.564
40,271
34,112
1,693
345'
979
• 2,161
323
658
23,293
5.855
2,953

760
2,193 .
2,902
2,902
109,739
Apr i 1 1 ,
1960
115.328
48 ;41 9
24,317
8,414
2,968
271
638
400
7,921
3.705
24,102
66,909
41.785
34,688
1,735
431
1,442
2,542
318
629
25,1-24
6.107
. 2,931 .

840
2,091
3,176
3,176
121,435
a/  Includes all of Skayit County except Census Divisions 1 and 2, and all of
Whatcom County except Census Divisions 1, 2, and 12; this corresponds to the
area designated as "densely populated" in the North Cascades study.
b/  Includes Skagit County Census Divisions 1 and 2, and Whatcom County Census
Divisions 1 and 2; this corresponds to the area designated as "sparsely popu-
lated" in the North Cascades study.
c/  Whatcom Census Division 12 (Point Roberts) is not included in the study area.

-------
                                                                        11




         2.  Prelected Industrial Production




         On the basis of the factors indicated in general terms in the




previous paragraph, the following rough projections, for planning purposes,




are suggested for production in each of the principal industries in the




North Puget Sound area:                           •     .




              a.  Food processing.--Employment in food processing increased




during the 1950-60-decade at an average rate of 1.8  percent per year.  In-




cluded within this category was some increase in processing of seafood.  Since




no future  increase is being projected for seafood processing, the rate of in-




crease during the study period is likely to be somewhat less than 1,8 percent.




For purposes of this study, it is assumed that the volume of output at food




processing plants (other than seafood) in the area will increase at about 1.5




percent per year,- a rate which would mean that 1985  volume- would have in-creased




by about 50 percent as compared with 1960 and that 2010 volume would have about




doubled, as compared with 1960.




              b.  Pulp.--Even though no increase in total timber harvest in the




area is anticipated, some increase in pulp production can-occur, through diversion




to pulp jiaking of logs now used for Ixiinber, and through the greater utilization.




of residues, wastes and marginal species.  A negative factor for the outlook of




pulp production in the area is the fact that, at present, a large share of the




raw material for pulp making comes from British Columbia, in the form of chips.




As the pulp capacity in British Columbia expands in the future, at least part




of this supply may find a market within British Columbia itself.  Nevertheless,




t'.-.', diversion of logs away from sawmills and more efficient utilization




should be able to support some expansion of output at the mill at Bellingham.




For purposes of this report, it is assumed that output will increase during




the study period at an average rate of about 1 percent per year, the same




rate assumed in a previous report for growth in output at the mills at Everett.

-------
                                                                             12

 At  this  rate,  output  at  Bellingham would  increase from the present 470 tons

 per day  to about  600  tons  by  1985  and  about 800 tons in 2010.  There is a

 probability that  the  present  pulp  plant at Anacortes will be closed down in

 the future, and,  for  purposes of projecting future water needs and water

' pollution, it  is  assumed that by 1985  there will be no pulp production at

 that site.

              c.  Petroleum  refining.--Growth in demand is expected to justify

 expansion of refining capacity at  Anacortes and Ferndale.  For planning purposes,

 it  is assumed  that  capacity at the three  refineries in the area will double by

 2010.

              d.  Aluminum.--In 1964, International Aluminum Co. announced plans

 to  construct an aluminum smelter at Ferndale.  Selection of the site was based

 upon its deep-water ocean  shipping facilities and the availability of low-cost
                                                          <  .                •  ' .
 electricity.  Initial capacity will be 20C tons per day.  It is essumed that

 growth of markets will justify expansion  of capacity in the future, and, for

 purposes of this  study,  it is assumed  that output will be about 400 tons per

 day in 1985 and about 600  tons per day in 2010.

              e.  Other Industries.--In  addition to growth in the basic industries

 just described, it  is assumed that diversified manufacturing in the area will

 increase, and  that  service industry employment will increase, not only absolutely

 but relative to "basic"  or "goods" employment.

           3. Projected Population.--While the previous section gives a broad

 indication of  the industrial  categories in which growth is  likely to occur, no

 attempt  has been  made in this report to project employment  in order to derive the

 future population that would  be  supported by the labor force.  Rather,

-------
                                                                      13

reliance has been placed on a ratio method for determining population, on the
basis of trends in the area's percentage of Washington State population.
The projection of Washington State population used here is that suggested
in May 1964 by the Economics Subcommittee of the Columbia Basin Inter-
Agency Committee.  According to that projection, Washington State population
would increase from-2.87 million in 1960 to 4.70 million in 1985 and 7.92 million
in 2010.  This would represent a rate of increase for the state of about
2.0 percent per year.  The North Puget Sound Study Area has grown at a rate
substantially below that for the state as a whole during recent decades.
The average annual rate of increase for the study area during the 1930-60
period was about 0.9 percent, compared xvith about 2 percent for the state
as a whole.  It is expected that the study area will continue to grow at .
a rate less than that for the state, although the disparity between the
two rates will not be as'great in the future, due to the spread northward
of growth from the Seattle Metropolitan Area.  For purposes of this report,
it is assumed that the study area's population will increase at a rate of
1.2 percent per year during the 1960-2010 period.  At this rate, the
population of the study area would increase from 121 thousand in 1960 to
163 thousand in  19S5 and 218 thousand in 2010.-/
         The distribution of this projected population between the "urban-
suburban" and "non-urban-rural" portions of the area shown in Table IV is
expected to continue to be about as it is at present.  For planning purposes,
a/  This projection for the Skagit-Whatcom two-county area is the same as that
adopted in  the Columbia Basin Inter-Agency Conimittee's North Cascade Mountains
Study, January 31, 1964, Table 1. '

-------
                                                                   14





 it  is  assumed that  the population  of  the area designated "non-urban




 and rural"  will  increase  from  6.1  thousand  in 1960 to about 7 thousand in




 1985 and about 8  thousand in 2010.  The remainder of the projected study




 area population would be  in the  "urban and  suburban", portion; that is,




 about  156 thousand  in 1985 and 210 thousand in 2010.




      No  attempt  should be made to   forecast the future population




 of  individual cities in the study  area without economic base studies of the




 cities concerned.   However, for  planning purposes, it is suggested that a




reasonable assumption would be  that the individual cities in the study area




 will .grow at  the  average  rate  for  the area  as a whole; that is, about 1.2




 percent  per year.

-------