United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Office of Air Quality
Planning and Standards
Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
EPA-454/R-99-024b
August 1999
AIR
©EPA
Air Emissions From
Reinforced Plastics Composite
Manufacturing Process
LASCO Panel Products: Volume
'*?sn*»
-------
FINAL REPORT
AIR EMISSIONS FROM
REINFORCED PLASTICS COMPOSITE
MANUFACTURING PROCESS
LASCO PANEL PRODUCTS
VOLUME II OF III
APPENDIX A.2
EPA Contract No. 68D70069
Work Assignment No. 2-10
Prepared for:
Mr. Solomon Ricks (MD-19)
Work Assignment Manager
SMTG, EMC, EMAD, OAQPS
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
August 1999
P:\i530\finrpt
Submitted by
PACIFIC ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
5001 South Miami Blvd., Suite 300
PO Box 12077
Research Triangle Park, NC 27709
(919) 941-0333
Fax: (919)941-0234
-------
DISCLAIMER
This document was prepared by Pacific Environmental Services, Inc. (PES) under
EPA Contract No. 68D70069, Work Assignment No. 2-10. This document has passed
PES' internal quality assurance review and has been approved for distribution. The
contents of this document do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the U.S.
EPA. Mention of trade names does not constitute endorsement by the EPA or PES.
n
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
VOLUME I Page
1.0 INTRODUCTION 1-1
2.0 SUMMARY OF TEST RESULTS 2-1
2.1 EMISSIONS TEST LOG 2-1
2.2 PROCESS LINE RESULTS 2-4
2.3 TOTAL TEMPORARY ENCLOSURE - METHOD 25A
TOTAL HYDROCARBON RESULTS 2-5
2.4 TOTAL TEMPORARY ENCLOSURE - VOLUMETRIC AIR
FLOWRATERESULTS 2-5
2.5 TOTAL TEMPORARY ENCLOSURE - METHOD 18 RESULTS .. 2-5
2.6 OVEN NOS. 9 AND 10 - METHOD 25A TOTAL
HYDROCARBON RESULTS 2-23
2.7 OVEN NOS. 9 AND 10 - VOLUMETRIC FLOW RATE
RESULTS 2-23
2.8 OVEN NOS. 9 AND 10 - METHOD 18 HAP RESULTS 2-23
2.9 UNCATALYZED RESIN (UCR) AND GEL COAT
SAMPLE RESULTS 2-23
2.10 RESPONSE FACTOR RESULTS 2-41
2.11 METHOD 204 TOTAL TEMPORARY ENCLOSURE
VERIFICATION 2-41
3.0 PROCESS DESCRIPTION 3-1
4.0 SAMPLING LOCATIONS 4-1
4.1 MAIN EXHAUST STACK 4-1
4.2 ROOM EXHAUST STACK 4-1
4.3 AUXILIARY EXHAUST STACK 4-4
4.4 NATURAL DRAFT OPENINGS 4-4
4.5 OVEN EXHAUST NO. 9 AND NO. 10 4-4
111
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued)
5.0 SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES 5-1
5.1 LOCATION OF MEASUREMENT SAMPLE/VELOCITY
TRAVERSE POINTS 5-1
5.2 DETERMINATION OF STACK GAS VOLUMETRIC
FLOW RATE 5-1
5.3 DETERMINATION OF DRY MOLECULAR WEIGHT 5-4
5.4 EXHAUST GAS MOISTURE CONTENT 5-4
5.5 DETERMINATION OF HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANTS 5-4
5.6 DETERMINATION OF TOTAL HYDROCARBONS 5-6
5.7 DETERMINATION OF VOLATILE MATTER CONTENT,
DENSITY, VOLUME OF SOLIDS, WEIGHT OF SOLIDS,
WATER CONTENT, AND HAPS BY DISTILLATION 5-6
5.8 RESPONSE FACTORS FOR FLAME IONIZATION
ANALYZERS 5-10
6.0 QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL 6-1
6.1 CALIBRATION OF APPARATUS ... > 6-1
6.2 ONSITE QA/QC 6-3
APPENDIX A - RAW FIELD DATA
Appendix A.I Manual Methods Raw Field Data
A. 1.1 Method 1 Field Data Sheets (includes flows, moistures, and
Method 18)
A. 1.2 Condition 1 (includes flows, moistures, and Method 18)
A. 1.3 Condition 2 (includes flows, moistures, and Method 18)
A. 1.4 Condition 3 (includes flows, moistures, and Method 18)
A. 1.5 Condition 4 (includes flows, moistures, and Method 18)
A. 1.6 Condition 5 (includes flows, moistures, and Method 18)
A. 1.7 Condition 6 (includes flows, moistures, and Method 18)
A. 1.8 Condition 7 (includes flows, moistures, and Method 18)
A. 1.9 Condition 8 (includes flows, moistures, and Method 18)
A. 1.10 Condition 9 (includes flows, moistures, and Method 18)
A. 1.11 Condition 10 (includes flows, moistures, and Method 18)
A. 1.12 Condition 11 (includes flows, moistures, and Method 18)
A. 1.13 Condition 12 (includes flows, moistures, and Method 18)
A. 1.14 Condition 13 (includes flows, moistures, and Method 18)
A. 1.15 NDO Summary Data
iv
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued)
VOLUME II
Appendix A.2 Instrumental Methods Raw Field Data
A.2.1 TTE Static Pressures
A.2.2 Method 25A Calibration Data
A.2.3 Condition 1 Method 25A
A.2.4 Condition 2 Method 25A
A.2.5 Condition 3 Method 25A
A.2.6 Condition 4 Method 25A
A.2.7 Condition 5 Method 25A
A.2.8 Condition 6 Method 25A
A.2.9 Condition 7 Method 25A
A.2.10 Condition 8 Method 25A
A.2.11 Condition 9 and 10 Method 25 A
A.2.12 Condition 11 Method 25A
A.2.13 Condition 12 Method 25A
A.2.14 Condition 13 Method 25A
A.2.15 Conditions 1-13 Method 25A Strip Charts
A.2.16 Oven Nos. 9 and 10 Method 25A
VOLUME III
APPENDIX B - ANALYTICAL DATA
B. 1 Method 18 Analytical Data
B.2 Method 18 GC Chromatograms
APPENDIX C - CALCULATIONS
APPENDIX D - QA/QC DATA
APPENDIX E - PROJECT PARTICIPANTS
-------
LIST OF TABLES
VOLUME I
Table 1.1
LASCO Panel Products Test Matrix .1-6
Table 2.1 Emission Test Log, LASCO Panel Products, Florence, Kentucky 2-2
Table 2.2 TTE Total Hydrocarbon Mass Emission Rate Summary 2-6
Table 2.3 Summary of TTE Stack Gas Conditions, and THC Concentrations
and Mass Emission Rates, Condition 1 - May 14,1997 2-8
Table 2.4 Summary of TTE Stack Gas Conditions and THC Concentrations -
Condition 2 - May 14,1997 2-9
Table 2.5 Summary of TTE Stack Gas Conditions and THC Concentrations -
Condition 3 - May 15,1997 2-10
Table 2.6 Summary of TTE Stack Gas Conditions and THC Concentrations -
Condition4 - May 15,1997 2-11
Table 2.7 Summary of TTE Stack Gas Conditions and THC Concentrations -
Condition 5 - May 19,1997 2-12
Table 2.8 Summary of TTE Stack Gas Conditions and THC Concentrations -
Condition 6 - May 19, 1997 2-13
Table 2.9 Summary of TTE Stack Gas Conditions and THC Concentrations -
Condition 7 - May 20,1997 2-14
Table 2.10 Summary of TTE Stack Gas Conditions and THC Concentrations -
Condition 8 - May 22,1997 2-15
Table 2.11 Summary of TTE Stack Gas Conditions and THC Concentrations -
Condition 9 - May 22,1997 2-16
Table 2.12 Summary of TTE Stack Gas Conditions and THC Concentrations -
Condition 10 - May 22, 1997 2-17
Table 2.13 Summary of TTE Stack Gas Conditions and THC Concentrations -
Condition 11 - May 23,1997 2-18
Table 2.14 Summary of TTE Stack Gas Conditions and THC Concentrations -
Condition 12 - May 29,1997 2-19
Table 2.15 Summary of TTE Stack Gas Conditions and THC Concentrations -
Condition 13 -May 29,1997 2-20,
Table 2.16 TTE Mass Rate Summary - Styrene, Methyl Methacrylate, and
Cumene by EPA Method 18 2-21
Table 2.17 Ovens 9 and 10 THC Mass Emission Rate Summary 2-24
VI
-------
LIST OF TABLES (Concluded)
Table 2.18 Summary of Oven Stack Gas Conditions and THC Concentrations
and Mass Emission Rates, Condition 1 - May 14,1997 2-26
Table 2.19 Summary of Oven Stack Gas Conditions and THC Concentrations
and Mass Emission Rates, Condition 2 - May 14,1997 2-27
Table 2.20 Summary of Oven Stack Gas Conditions and THC Concentrations
and Mass Emission Rates, Condition 3 - May 15,1997 2-28
Table 2.21 Summary of Oven Stack Gas Conditions and THC Concentrations
and Mass Emission Rates, Condition 4 - May 15,1997 2-29
Table 2.22 Summary of Oven Stack Gas Conditions and THC Concentrations
and Mass Emission Rates, Condition 5 - May 19,1997 2-30
Table 2.23 Summary of Oven Stack Gas Conditions and THC Concentrations
and Mass Emission Rates, Condition 6 - May 19, 1997 2-31
Table 2.24 Summary of Oven Stack Gas Conditions and THC Concentrations
and Mass Emission Rates, Condition 7 - May 20,1997 2-32
Table 2.25 Summary of Oven Stack Gas Conditions and THC Concentrations
and Mass Emission Rates, Condition 8 - May 22,1997 2-33
Table 2.26 Summary of Oven Stack Gas Conditions and THC Concentrations
and Mass Emission Rates, Condition 9 - May 22,1997 2-34
Table 2.27 Summary of Oven Stack Gas Conditions and THC Concentrations
and Mass Emission Rates, Condition 10 - May 22, 1997 2-35
Table 2.28 Summary of Oven Stack Gas Conditions and THC Concentrations
and Mass Emission Rates, Condition 11 - May 23,1997 2-36
Table 2.29 Summary of Oven Stack Gas Conditions and THC Concentrations
and Mass Emission Rates, Condition 12 - May 29,1997 2-37
Table 2.30 Summary of Oven Stack Gas Conditions and THC Concentrations
and Mass Emission Rates, Condition 13 - May 29,1997 2-38
Table 2.31 Ovens 9 and 10 Mass Emission Rate Summary - Styrene,
Methyl Methacrylate, and Cumene by EPA Method 18 2-39
Table 2.32 Summary of Response Factor Results - Styrene Bag Standards 2-42
Table 5.1 Sources, Test Parameters, and Methods Summary
LASCO Panel Products - Florence, Kentucky 5-2
Table 6.1 Summary of Temperature Sensors Calibration Requirements 6-2
Table 6.2 Summary of Calibration Results for THC Analyzers
Condition Nos. 1-13, LASCO Panel Products 6-5
Table 6.3 Summary of EPA Method 18 Quality Assurance Results
Styrene Recovery Efficiencies 6-7
Table 6.4 Summary of Desorption Efficiencies 6-7
vn
-------
LIST OF FIGURES
VOLUME I Page
Figure 1.1 Key Personnel and Responsibility for Testing at LASCO
Panel Products 1-2
Figure 1.2 Overview of Sampling Locations 1-5
Figure 2.1 Diagram of Temporary Total Enclosure 2-43
Figure 4.1 Main Exhaust Sample Location 4-2
Figure 4.2 Room Exhaust Sample Location 4-3
Figure 4.3 Auxiliary Exhaust Sampling Location 4-5
Figure 4.4 Natural Draft Opening Sampling Location 4-6
Figure 4.5 Oven No. 9 Schematic of Sampling Location 4-7
Figure 4.6 Oven No. 10 Schematic of Sampling Location 4-8
Figure 5.1 Schematic of EPA Method 4 Sampling Train 5-5
Figure 5.2 Schematic of EPA Method 18 Sampling System -
Sorbent Tube Method 5-7
Figure 5.3 Schematic of Methane/Ethane Sampling System 5-8
Figure 5.4 EPA Method 25A Total Gaseous Organic Analyzer and
Sample System 5-9
Figure 5.5 Schematic of Bag Standard Preparation System 5-13
Vlll
-------
Appendix A.2
Instrumental Methods
Raw Field Data
-------
APPENDIX A.2.1
TTE Static Pressures
-------
The following are static pressures recorded continuously inside the TTE. The scale was zero to 0.05 inches
negative, the negative portion of the scale was set above the zero on all graphs.
" 0.8508
3.0458
0.8408
8.8358
0.8308
0.8258
8.8208
6.0150
8.8108
0.8858
0.0008
•f 8.8858
J-0.8108
4-8.8158
4-0.8208
"UC
LASCO Panel Products
Run PT-1-1 10-39 - 11'39
Mean 8.8083 Inches of Uater Column
10.40 10,50
14 May'97,18-37'08
11:08
STATIC PRESSURE
11:28
11:38
(HH'IHI)
Key:
Graph 1 Trace 1
14-PT-2.DTA
Point
Line
14 May 1997
I
N
C
H
E
S
0
F
U
ft
T
E
R
8.8508
9.0450-
0.0400
0.8350
0.0300
0.8258
0.8208
8.8158
0.8100
8.8830
8.8800
-8.8050
1-8.0100
fe.oiso
to.0200
"UC
LftSCO Panel Products
Run PT-1-2 12'38 - 13-38
M»«n 0.0084 Inches of Uater Colum
12-30 12-48
14 May'97,12-28-80
12-58 13-00
STATIC PRESSURE
13-10
13-28
Key:
Graph 1 Trace 1
14-PT-2.DTA
Point
Line
14 May 1997
-------
0.0500
0.8450
0.0408
0.0350
0.3300
0.0250
0.0200
0.0150
0.8108
0.0050
0.0000
10.0050
40.0100
•f8.0150
4- f0.0200
"UC
I
N
C
H
E
S
0
F
U
A
T
E
R
LASCO Panel Products
Run PT-1-3 15'40 - 16'40
t1ean~8.W68 Inches of Water
15-40 15-50
14 May'97, .J5'38'88
16-08
STATIC PRESSURE
(HH'MII)
Key:
Graph 1 Trace 1
14-PT-2.DTA
Point
Line
14 May 1997
n««n 8.8038 Inch** of U«t»r
28'e« 30-38
"UC 14 May'97, £0-19'88
£«'48 20.50 81-88
STATIC PRESSURE
21'10
21'80
rai>
Key i
Graph 1 Trace 1
14-PT-3.DTA
Point
Line
14 May 1997
-------
0.0700T-
I
N
C
H
E
S
0
F
U
A
T
E
R
LftSCO Panel Products
Run PT-2-2 22'89 - 23'00
Mem 0.8036 Inches of Water Colunn
+9.0500
"UC
22>80 22'10
14 May'97,21'58-80
22'28 22'30
STATIC PRESSURE
£2'40
Key:
Graph 1 Trace l
14-PT-3.DTA
Point
Line
May 1997
I
N
C
H
E
S
0
F
U
A
T
E
R
•4-
0.0708
0.0600
0.8508
0.8400
0.8308
0.0208
0.0100
0.8808
•(•8.8108
10.8208
10.8308
fe.8408
4-9.0508
LftSCO Panel Products
Run PT-2-3 23'30 - 08'38
Hem 0.0077 Irenes of Water Colunn
"UC
23'38 23'40
14 rUv'97.23'29'80
33'30 0i80
STATIC PRESSURE
e>ie
CHH'MII)
Key:
GraplTl Trace 1
14-PT-3.DTA
Point
Line
14 May 1997
-------
LASCO Panel Products
Run PT-3-2 16<00 - 17'00
Mean 0.0171 Inches of Ulater Colunn
16-ee
15 May'97,15'58'00
STATIC PRESSURE
16-40
16-50
Key:
Graph l Trace I
15-PT-3.DTA
Point
IS May 1997
LASCO Panel Products
Run PT-3-3 17'33 - 18'35
Mem 0.0196 Inches of UaUr Colunn
"UC
17'40
IS M«v'97.17<33<0e
17'50
18'80 18-10
STATIC PRESSURE
18-£0
18'30
Key:
Graph 1 Trace 1
1S-PT-3.DTA
Point
Line
15 May 1997
-------
I
N
C
H
E
S
0
F
U
A
T
E
R
0.0700
0.0600
0.0500
8.8400
8.0300
0.0200
8.8100
8.0000
1-8.0100
f0.0200
f0.0300
"UC
LASCO Panel Products
Run PT-4-1 20-85 - 21'05
Mean 0.0199 Inches of Water Colunn
20'10
IS May'97.c«<03'08
20 "20
28'38 £0:48
STATIC PRESSURE
21^00
nn>
Key!
Graph 1 Trace 1
1S-PT-4.DTA
Point
Line
IS May 1991
LASCO Panel Products
Run PT-4-2 21'58 - 22'M
Mean 0.0331 Inches of Water Colunn
'38 21-48
"UC 13 May'97.21'28'00
21'50 22*00
STATIC PRESSURE
22'10
£2'20
Key:
Graph 1 Trace 1
15-PT-4.DTA Point
Line
15 May 1997
-------
9.0500
I
M
C
H
E
S
0
F
U
A
T
E
R
Products Run PT-5-1 9'84 -10'26
Mean 6.8809 Inches of Water C>lunn
0.0808
,«.„ 9'le
"UC 19 Mag'97,09.02.80
9-38 . '•••'' 9'48 9-58
STATIC PRESSURE
10-88
18.18
10'80
m>
Key:
Graph 1 Trace 1
19-PT-l.DTA
Point
Line
19 May 1997
-------
— 0.0300
I
N
C
H
E
S
0
F
T
E
R
-V-
LftSCO Panel Products
0.84501 """ PT-3-3 13'53 - 15'15
Mean~0.0a08 Inches of Water Colunn
14 '88 14'10
"UC 19 May'97.13'51'80
14-E0 14-30 14-40
STATIC PRESSURE
14<50 • 15-00 15' 10
Key:
Graph I Trace 1
19-PT-l.DTA
Point
Line
19 May 1997
LASCO Panel Products
Run PT-6-1 16'B3 - 17'07
Mean 0.0896 Inches of Water Colunn
16'ie
19 Hay'97,16-03'80
16'38 16-40
STATIC PRESSURE
17-00
Keyt
Graph 1 Trace 1
19-PT-l.DTA Point
19 May 1997
-------
0.8500
9.8450
0.9408
0.0358
0.0300
0.0350
0.8808
0.8158
8.0100
0.8858
0.0000
19.0050
fe.eioa
"UC
LASCO Panel Products
Run PT-6-2 17<33 - 18=56
Mean 6.0098 Inches of Uater Colunn
,,.17-48 17:50
19 May'97.17'31<08
Ia,l0 18:20
STATIC PRESSURE
18:30
18:40
18:50
CHH-nri)
Key:
Graph 1 Trace 1
19-PT-l.DTA
Point
Line
19 May 1997
LASCO Panel Products
Run PT-6-3 19'37 - £8'19
Mean e.0868 Inches of Uater Colunn
19'33 19-48 19'45
UC 19 Has)'97,19'33' 88
19-30 19'53 20>C8
STATIC PRESSURE
28*05
20-10
28'15
-------
LASCO Panel Products
Run PT-7-1
14-49 - 16-13
Mean 6.0099 Inches of Water'Colunn
"UC
14-50 15-00
20 Mag'97.14-47-00
15'10
15-20 15-39 15-40
STATIC PRESSURE
15'50
16:00
16-10
(HH'HM)
Key:
Graph 1 Trace 1
20-PT-l.DTA Point
Line
20 May 1397
— 8.0300
e.easo
LASCO Panel Products
Run PT-7-8 17-03 - 18
Mean 0.0096 Inches of Water Column
17H8 17«88
"UC 38 Mag'97.17'01'00
17-30 17-40 17>se
STATIC PRESSURE
i8>eo
18-10
18-E8
Keyt
Graph 1 Trace 1 20-PT-l.DTA Point
T.tM
20 Hay 1997
-------
~- 8.0308
I
N
C
H
E
S
0
F
U
A
T
E
R
0.8258
neon 8.CC77 Inches of Uat*r Colunn
+0.0030
-f- +0.0100
19'18 19-28 19'30
'UC 28 May'97,19'09'80
19'40 19^58 28=88
STATIC PRESSURE
2853 8'08
22 H«v'97,07'32'e8
8<83
8'18 8'13 8'£B 8-23
STATIC PRESSURE
8-30
8'33
3>48
m>
Key i
Graph 1 Trace 1 22-PT-l.DTA Point
Lin*
23 May 1997
-------
LflSCO Panel Products
Run PT-8-2 9'81 - 10-53
Mean"8.0106 Irxihes of Uater Colunn
"UC
9-28 9-38 9'48
22 May'97.69'19'88
STATIC PRESSURE
10-58
(HH'MID
Key:
Graph 1 Trace 1
22-PT-l.DTA Point
Line
22 May 1927
LASCO Panel Products
Run PT-6-3 11'48 - 13'33
8.8118 Inches of Uater Colun
"UC
11'48 11-58
SZ Mw'97.11'38-88
ia-18 12-88
STATIC PRESSURE
teyj
Graph 1 Trace 1
22-PT-l.DTA,
Point
22 May 1997
-------
LftSCO Panel Products
Run PT-9-1 18-04 - 18'58
Mean 0.0186 Inches of Uater Colunn
18'85 18'10 18U5
UC 32 May'97.18'04-80
18-20 . 18-25 18^30
STATIC PRESSURE
18'40
13-45 18'30
CHH'MII)
Key:
Graph 1 Trace 1
22-PT-2.DTA Point
22 May 1997
I
N
C
H
E
S
0
F
U
A
T
E
R
0.0280'
0.8188
0.0160
0.8140
0.8120
e.eioe
0.8080
0.8868
0.8040
0.8020
f0. 8828
f 0.8040
"UC
Mean 0.0188 "UC
19-33 - 19-39
LASCO Panel Products
Run PT-10-1 19-35 - 2a'37
Mean 0.0124 Inches of Water Colunn
Mean 0.0122 *UC
19-39 - 20-31
nean 0.0129 "UC
20-31 - 28-57
19-40 19-38
22 Hay'97.19-33-88
20-08
28-18 20-20
STATIC PRESSURE
28-38
20>48
20138
W1>
Tay.
Graph 1 Trace 1
22-PT-2.DTA
Point
22 May 1997
-------
LASCO Panel Products
Run PT-11-1 9*12-10-12
Mean 0.6114 Inches of Water Column
"UC
9'20
S3 May'97.09'12'88
9^40
STATIC PRESSURE
Key:
Graph 1 Trace l
23-PT-l.DTA
Poinc
Line
23 May 1997
LASCO Panel Products
Run PT-11-2 18'£8 - 11'19
Hean e.Oiee Inches of Water Colum
18-53 ll
Key:
Graph 1 Trace 1
23-PT-l.DTA Point
Line
23 May 1997
-------
8.0558
LASCO Panel Products
Run PT-12-1 8-37 - 9-37
Mean 8.8582 Inches of Water Colunn
"UC
8'40 8'50
39 May'97,ei8'37<88
9'08 ' 9'10
STATIC PRESSURE
9-ae
9'30
Key:
Graph 1 Trace l
29-PT.DTA
Point
Line
29 May 1997
I
N
C
H
E
S
0
F
U
ft
T
E
R
8.8558
0.0508
8.0450
8.0408
8.8350
0.8308
0.0330
8.0200
0.0150
0.0100
0.8058
8.0080
48.8830
40.0100
"UC
LASCO Panel Products
Run PT-12-3 11=85 - 12-84
Mean 0.8883 Inches of Uater Colunn
11'10
29 Mag'97,11'05'88
11'E0
11-30 11-48
STATIC PRESSURE
11-50
12-80
Key:
Graph 1 Trace 1
29-PT.DTA
Point
Line
29 Hay 1997
-------
I
N
C
H
E
S
0
F
U
A
T
E
R
9.8550
0.050e
0.0450
8.8400
0.0350
0.0300
9.ease
0.0200
0.0130
8.0100
8.0050
8.0800
10.0050
f8.0100
"UC
LASCO Panel Products
Run PT-12-4 12'31 -
13>31
titan 0.0290 Inches of Water Column
12'40
29 May'97.13'31-80
1S-50 13>00 13'10
STATIC PRESSURE
13 '28
13'30
Key:
Graph 1 Trace 1
29-PT.DTA
Point
Line
29 May 199T
LASCO Panel Products
Run PT-13-1 13t20 - 16-15
Mt«n 8.0381 Inches of Water Colum
15'48 _15j58
STATIC PRESSURE
16-oa
16'10
-------
LASCO Panel Products
Run PT-13-2 16-37 - 17-37
Mean 0.0282 Inches of (later Colunn
"UC
16'40 16'50
May'97.16<37'80
17:00
STATIC PRESSURE
17^38
(HH'liri)
Key:
Graph 1 Trace 1
29-PT.DTA
Poinc
Line
29 May 1997
I
N
C
H
E
S
0
F
U
A
T
E
R
0.0550
0.8500
0.8450
0.0400
0.0330
0.8300
0.02S0
0.0200
0.0150
0.8100
0.0030
0.0008
10.8058
f0.8108
"UC
LASCO Panel Products
RLCI PT-13-3 18 = 82 - 19'02
8.8262 Inches of Uater Colunn
18-10
29 May'97,10'02'00
18>20
10.30 18'48
STATIC PRESSURE
18'50
19'00
(HH'MM)
Key:
Graph 1 Trace 1
29-PT.DTA
Point
Line
29 May 1997
-------
APPENDIX A.2.2
Method 25A Calibration Data
-------
INITIAL CEM CALIBRATION AND PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
Plant: LA6CQ
Location:
Date: '
Parameter: SO2, CO2, O2, NOx.1
Monitor: ^Spf^br % ~~
Operator: _
Project #:
?.
Span Value: 100
Chart Scale: ^
Pbar, in. Hg.:
Cylinder
#
AAL/7IO
MkUlfic>i^
kLMDZfelUI
Cal. Gas
Cone.,
<0^m)or%
o
270.5
4b-?5.?5
3flb.7
Chart Division*
Direct
Injection
to Monitor
o. 1
24,. a
45.7
67.1
Injection
Through
System
O.2.
2U.2.
44.7
85. 4
Concentration
Predicted by
Equation,"
Direct System
0.
-------
INITIAL CEM CALIBRATION AND PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
Plant: LhSCO
Location: ROOK
Date: ^-i-v,
Parameter:S2, CO2, 02, NOX,(
Monitor:
Operator: _
Project #:
P.
Span Value: 100
Chart Scale:
o- soo
Pbar, in. Hg.: 23.
Cylinder
#
^LKOIUoSC
AM-flD
fe=our
AM-lSSli
CaLGu
pfT^Of %
o
8.2>
Chart Divisions
Direct
Injection
to Monitor
0 .0
IS. 5
Injection
Through
System
o .0
XT. /
4-A.9 1 -fft.o
A3 .2.
at.o
1
Concentration
Predicted by
Equation,*
Direct System
-I.L -1.2.
ft=>.-2. SZ.^
211.4 1U>,4
4U2..L 45fc.2>
1
Calibration
Error,"
%of6parr
^A.<»
I .^"^
6. "*>?>
Sampling
System
Bias/"
% of Span
0 0
o.4
Q.1
1,2.
* Perform linear regression of pretest cal. gas concentration vs. chart divisions to
determine the following equation:
y = mx + b x = ppm y = chart divisions
For Data Reduction:
Pollutant, ppm/% = (Chart Division - b) = (CD-fl.it4)
m
Correlation Coefficient =
/).
Calculation concentration predicted by equatio using actual chart response
obtained from each calibration gas response.
** Analyzer cal. error, % cal. gas value =
l- S^s cone., ppm - cone, predicted, ppm) x 100
Cal. gas value, ppm
Acceptable limit = < 2% of calibration gas value (< 5% for THC)
(Direct inject, gas cone. - System inject, gas cone.) x 100
Span value
*** Sampling system bias =
Acceptable limit < 5% of span
Minimum detectable limit = 2% of span or /O ppm or % (circle one)
Rise time to 95% of response for high cal. gas injected through the system
(return to zero after each injection): 23 s. 24 s. 24 s Average = 23 s
Precision, % scale = difference in chart division response for two repeated
injections of the gas concentrations = - • %
(Clock time = )
-------
INITIAL CEM CALIBRATION AND PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
Plant:
Parameter: 5O2, C02, O2, NOxfrHCi
Location: ku^^as
Date: 5-^ _q
Operator: p, 61
Project #: ^4D
>y Exv\pvU6T Monitor: rfSpn^or %
1 Span Value: 100
ctiei- Chart Scale: G-^OO
% .&&:»> Pbar, in. Hg.: 23. ao
ppm
rr
Cylinder
#
AsLfr\ftiu,ao
AM-Tlb
/^A.Llft«>l3
Cal. Gas
0
64.08
no
9,4.4 ft%.?>
211.4 It^.T
4LZ.8 4fS7.1
Calibration
Error,"*
%of€parr
<^A^>
O. ?>ft
0.4 1
Sampling
System
Bias,—
% of Span
0.^
O.2.
0.3.
i .O
* Perform linear regression of pretest cal. gas concentration vs. chart divisions to
determine the following equation:
y s mx + b x = ppm y = chart divisions
For Data Reduction:
Pollutant, ppm/% = (Chart Division - b) = (CD-o.iob)
m
(o,
Correlation Coefficient =
Calculation concentration predicted by equatio using actual chart response
obtained from each calibration gas response.
*• Analyzer cal. error, % cat. gas value = (Cal. gas cone., ppm - cone, predicted, ppm) x 100
CaJ. gas value, ppm
Acceptable limit = < 2% of calibration gas value (< 5% for THC)
***
_ .. . .. (Direct inject, gas cone. - System inject, gas cone.) x 100
Sampling system bias = J ' —-—• '• '
Span value
Acceptable limit < 5% of span
Minimum detectable limit = 2% of span or /O ppm or % (circle one)
Rise time to 95% of response for high cal. gas injected through the system
(return to zero after each injection): ,23 s. £3 s. Z*>s Average • .25 s
.Precision, % scale = difference in chart division response for two repeated
injections of the gas concentrations « - = %
(Clock time = )
-------
\— /O.--VD
~T
"T
Dan
170.5;**"
10-
4 *•
.._».
i>-£
Z3C
.
T"
2.7
T
4
-1
*
b^
1 !
ua
••/I
1 1C1
^
-------
-? 6-
r
~n
H
T"
^4A3,
. .
i i ' 1
: 1
? />/Oiv\
— j D1R.6J
1
_; L
L. „ . I
*~ ' t ' ' ••••••
:-4- !
l
//"' ;
, i
i ! )
\ • \
\ \
!
1
"^...-O
2,, O^
|
«*f.io»
i
J
0 1 —2
-------
LASCO Panel Products
Condition 1 - Main Exhaust
Total Hydrocarbons (THC)
14-May-97
Calibration Gases
0.0 ppm
270.5 ppm
463.3 ppm
886.7 ppm
System Calibration
-0.4
270.7
457.8
874.0
Direct Calibration
-0.4
274.5
465.5
889.3
Correlation 0.9999852
Slope 0.9849099
Intercept 1.5133616
Sampling System Bias
0.00%
0.38%
0.77%
1.53%
Correlation 0.9999908
Slope 1.0024036
Intercept 1.1262325
Calibration Error
0.82%
0.01%
Calibration Gases
0.0 ppm
886.7 ppm
1737.0 ppm
System Calibration
••' -2
895
1735
Calibration Error
0.77%
Correlation 0.9999766
Slope 1.0000828
Intercept 1.3608936
10:20
Post Cal
17
1755
Dnft 0.38%
0.40%
10:39-11:39 Run 1-1 | 2967
11:51 Post Cal
Corrected 2965 ppm THC
17
1716
Drift 0.38%
0.38%
12:30-13:30 Run1-2| 2732
Corrected 2730 ppm THC |
Calibration Gases
0.0 ppm
1737.0 ppm
2418.0 ppm
System Calibration
-2
1697
2385
Calibration Error
0.58%
Correlation 0.9999743
Slope 0.9853986
Intercept -4.777032
15:40-16:40 Run 1-3 2753
Corrected 2799 ppm THC|
Calibration Gases
0.0 ppm
1737.0 ppm
2418.0 ppm
4507.0 ppm
System Calibration
-2
1755
2480
4485
Calibration Error
0.14%
2.03%
Correlation 0.99982
Slope 0.9962339
Intercept 22.1554
Pagel
-------
p
p
n
p
R
o
p
ft
N
E
900.0-
£00.0
700.0
£00.0
408.8
188.8
8.8
ppn
LASCO Panel Produc
-0.4
*s Direct vs. Systen Calibration
889.3 .
Calibration Gases
886.7 ppn
463.3 PPH
270.5 ppn
0.8 ppn
465.5
L
274.5
-8.4
I
874.8
457.8
270.7
-8.4
7:44 7:46 7:48 7:50 7:52 7:54 7:56 7:58 8'00 8:02
14 nay "97, 07: 42: 25 MAIN EXHAUST
P
P
n
P
R
0
p
A
N
E
5808
4500
4808'
3500
3808'
2500
2000
1500
1000
500-
0 •
LASCO Panel Products
Systen Calibration Drift Check
Calibration Cases
0.8 ppn
1737 ppn
886.7 ppn
1735
r_ .. -
1 895
r / i
1 V \
ppn 14 May'97,89:05'24
9: 18
9:12 9:14
MAIN EXHAUST
9:16
9:18
p
p
h
p
R
0
P
A
N
E
4500-
4000
3500
3000
2300
2800
1500
1000
500
0
aim
LASCO Panel Products
Systen Calibration Drift Check
Calibration Casts
0.0 ppn
1737 ppn
1755
r i
w 1 I »
10i21 10 '22 10 '23 10 '24 10 '25 10-26
14 Hav'97.10'S0.46 MAIN EXHAUST m>
-------
p
p
M
p
R
0
P
A
N
E
P
P
n
P
R
0
P
A
N
E
P
P
n
p
0
p
A
E
5800'
4508-
4088
3508
OOUv
2508
2008
1508
1008
508
0
I
LflSCO Panel Products
Run ME-1-1 18 '39 - 11 '39
r . j i ,, , T „- , ,, ^ jir.w.
"~ ~— —'-
Mean 2967 fen Propane
10-40 10=50 11:00 11:10 11:20 11:30
ppm 14 nay-97, 10:37:00 MAIN EXHAUST (HH-nn)
5000 T
4500
4000
3300
3000
2500
2008
1500
1008
500
1
LASCO Panel Products
Systen Calibration Drift Check
Calibration Cases
0.0 ppn
1737 ppn
1716
17 \ 17
11<52 11 '54 11:56 ll'SS 12 '00 12 '82
ppn 14 May'97. 11=51 '88 MAIN EXHAUST
5808
4508
4000
3508
3008
2300
2888
1508
1808
508
0
LftSCO Panel Products K
Run rt-1-2 12 '30 - 13 '38
Mean 2732 ppn Propane
12'30 12-46 12-50 13 '88 13-10 13-88
MM 14 M*u'47. IP-PaiCin MAIM CVtlAllOT /uu.MUS
-------
P
p
n
p
R
o
p
A
N
E
4508-
4000-
3500'
3000
2500
£908
1508
1008
508
8
an
LftSCO Panel Products
Systen Calibration Drift Check
Calibration Gases / :
0.0 PP«
1737 pen
2418 Pfm
-2
2385
1697
1
'
13-52 13-54 13-56 13-58 14-08 14-02 14-04 14-06 14-08
14 May'97. 13-51-16 MAIN EXHAUST (HH-MM)
P
P
n
p
R
0
p
A
N
E
5000'
4500-
4000-
3500-
3000-
2500
2000
1500
1060
500
0
I
.j LASCO Panel Products
'!>'Run rlE-1-3 15^40 - 16-40
^^^^s^,^^
Mean 2753 ppn Propane
ppn
15-40 15-50
14 Hay'97.15=38-00
16-00 16-10
MAIN EXHAUST
16-20
16-30
(HH-rlM)
P
P
n
p
R
o
p
A
_N
E
4500-
4000
3500
3000
OKAA
C9UI9
2000
1500
ieoe
500
I
LOSCO Panel Products
Systtn Calibration
Calibration Gases
0.0 ppn
2418 ppn
1737 ppn
4507 ppn
2480
-2 .
1755
4485 I
\
\
S
Y
ppn
17-14 17-16
14 Hasi'97.17-13'80
17'18 17-20 17-82
MAIN EXHAUST
17-24
17-28
m>
-------
LASCO Panel Products
Condition 1 - Room Exhaust
Total Hydrocarbons (THC)
14-May-97
Calibration Gases
0.0 ppm
84.1 ppm
270.5 ppm
463.3 ppm
System Calibration
0.1
85.8
276.1
462.2
Direct Calibration
0.1
85.8
276.1
464.3
Correlation 0.9999003
Slope 0.9989028
Intercept 1.7993421
Sampling System Bias
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.38%
Correlation 0.9999364
Slope 1.0031608
Intercept 1.4536884
Calibration Error
0.02%
1.21%
9:00
10:15
10:39-11:39 Run 1-1 |
11:46
12:30-13:30 Run 1-2
13:42
Post Cal
Post Cal
0.1
460.1
4.3
468.5
Drift 0.00%
0.38%
Drift 0.76%
1.15%
381.9
Corrected 380.5 ppm THC |
Post Cal
2.2
458.0
Drift 0.38%
0.76%
354.6
Corrected 353.2 ppm THC |
Post Cal
0.1
462.2
Drift 0.00%
0.00%
15:40-16:40 Run 1-3 352.7
Corrected 351.3 ppm THC |
Calibration Gases
0.0 ppm
270.5 ppm
463.3 ppm
System Calibration
2.2
261.5
443.4
Calibration Error
0.44%
Correlation 0.9999903
Slope 0.9527059
Intercept 2.6681283
Paeel
-------
p
n 330.0
p 380.8
R £50 0
0
P £00.0
N 150.0
108.0
58.8
8.0
ppn
558.8'
ree.e
450.8
P 408.8
P
n 330. e
p 380.0
" £50.0
0
P £80.0
N 150-e
E 108.8
58.0
8.8
538.8'
560.0-
450.0
P 400.0
P
H 350.8
p 380.0
R £50.0
0
P £80.0
A
H 158.0 H
E 100.6
58.8-
0.6
ppn
270.5 ppn
84.08 ppn
e.ee ppn
276'1 276.1
85.8 85. 8 M
B.I a i I
8'88 8'18 8'12 8.14 8'16 '8=18 8.28 8'22 8>84
4 Ma«>97,e8'07'83 ROOM EXHAUST
Ij
LASCO Panel Products
Systen Calibration Drift Check
Calibration Gases f ,„ .
8.00 ppn
463.3 ppn
8.1
9 '81 9.02 9 '83 9 '84 9 '05 9 '86 9.87 9.08 9 '09
14 nay '97,09. 00. 13 ROOM EXHAUST
t
LASCO Panel Products
Systen Calibration Drift Check
Calibration Cases f~ 466.5 !
0.66 ppn
463.3 ppn |
.
1
4.3 \
10*16 IQ'17 10'18 10il9 16*20 10.21
14 Mag '97, 16* 13* 44 ROOM EXHAUST
-------
p
p
N
P
R
0
P
ft
N
E
P
P
n
p
R
0
p
ft
N
E
458.8
480.0
:-se.e
380.0
£58.8
£98.8
158.8
100.0
58.8
8.8
ppn
558.8'
see. e
458.8
480.8
338.8
380.8
£58.8
£88.8
150.8
180.0
58.8
8.8
LASCO Panel Products '
Run 9>£-\-\ 10'39 - 11 '39
^NwA-'~^^
\j ^vS-V~-
dean 381.9 ppn Propane
18.48 18'58 11 '80 ll'ie 11'28 1 1 ' 38
14 May'97,10'37'80 ROOM EXHAUST (HH'MH)
LASCO Panel Products * •. i
Systen Calibration Drift Check j\
Calibration Gasrs ^ 459.8 I
8.80 ppn 1
463.3 ppn . 1
1
'
2.2 l^
ppn
11'47 11'43
14 Mau'97,ll'46<4e
11•49 11'
ROOM EXHAUST
P
P
n
p
R
o
p
-A
N
E
550.8
500.8
450.0
488.0
350.0
300.0
£58.8
cfla.e
150.0
100.0
50.0
e.e
LASCO Panel Products
Run RE-1-2 12>30 - 13'38
Mean 354.6 ppn Propane
14
'38
12 '48
12'58
13-00
ROOM EXHAUST
13'18
13'28
-------
p
p
M
P
R
0
P
A
N
E
M8.8-
458.8-
493.0
350.8
380.8
159.9
M8.8
159.9
lee.e
58.8
8.8
i
PPM
LftSCO Panel Products
Systen Calibration Drift
Calibration Gases
8.88 ppn
463.3 ppn
8.1
Check
1
462. 2
'
I
^
3 = 43 13-44 13=45 13-46 13-47 13'48 13-49 13-58
14 nay'97, 13=42=53 ROOK EXHAUST (HM-nri)
P
P
M
P
R
0
P
A
N
E
M8.0-
450.0
408.8
358.8
388.0
150.0
£98. 6
150.0
100.8
50.0
0.0
14
ppm
i
LflSCO Panel Products , .
Calibration Gas Standard
I
ICC ppn Styrene Gas Standard
255.2
=35 14=36 14=37 14=38 14=39 14=40 14-41 14-42 14=43 14-44
14 nay '97. 14 = 35- 80 ROOM EXHAUST (HH'MM)
P
p
M
P
R
0
P
A
-N
E
538.6
?ee.e
458.8
488.8
:-s0.0
388.8
£58.0
£B0.8
150.0
100.8
59.0
0.8
LftSCO Panel Products
Run RE-1-3 15=40 - 16=40
Probe out of stack
5 Minutes
Mean 355.2 ppn Propane
15-40 - 16-15
Mean 347.9 ppn Propane
16=20 - 16-38
13-48 15-58
ppn 14 Mav'97,15-38-88
16-00 16-10
ROOM EXHAUST
16-20
16-38
-------
p
p
n
p
R
o
p
A
N
E
M8.8'
458.8
488.8
358.8
:ee.e
cse.e
cee.e
158.8
188.8
58.8
e.e
ppm
a.a
| LftSCO Panel Products l
\ Systen Calibration drift Check
443.4
Calibration Gases
8.08 ppn \ 26K5
370.5 ppn
16 '58 17-88 17-ea 17-84 17-06 17'88 17'18 17 -li
14 May '97, 16 < 57 '48 ROOM EXHAUST (HH'MII)
Key:
Graph 1 Trace 1
14-RE-2.DTA
Point
Line
14 May 1997
-------
INITIAL CEM CALIBRATION AND PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
Plant: LrVbCQ
HMK!
Location:
Date: 5-14 -
Parameter: SO2, CO2, O2. NOxCtHC:
Monitor:
Operator:
Project #:
P.
Span Value: 100
Chan: Scale: o -
Pbar, in. Hg.: .28.
Cylinder
#
A*L1 I O
KM. Lfe5t2>
MMOlfclkl
Cal. Gas
Cone.,
ft
11O.S
4bi.!>
ftftb.-7
Chart Divisions
Direct
Injection
to Monitor
o. 1
2-7. i
4t.k
&X 1°°
Span value
Acceptable limit < 5% of span
Minimum detectable limit = 2% of span or 2.O ppm or % (circle one)
Rise time to 95% of response for high cal. gas injected through the system
(return to zero after each injection): s, s, s Average • 2*7 s
Precision, % scale = difference in chart division response for two repeated
injections of the gas concentrations = - - %
(Clock time B )
-------
ij oca
DAILY GEM CALIBRATION AND PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
Location: Mpwki
Date: 5-14-37
Parameter: SO2, CO2, O2, NOx,.\ . A. i
nfl ,^"
S4-.<1 ^?4.9 .?4.l .^z.^
41. Z
Concentration Predicted
By Equation'
^•'1Q [Q'.2.o li:SO I"3>.'SS
Analyzer
Calibration
Error,"
% of Scan
, Drift.—
% of Span
* Perform linear regression of pretest cal. gas concentration vs. chart divisions to
determine the following equation:
y = mx + b x = ppm y = chart divisions
For Data Reduction:
Pollutant, ppm/o/o = (Chart Division - b) = (CD- )
m
Correlation Coefficient =
**
Analyzer cal. error, % cal. gas value = (Cal. gas cone. - cone, predicted) x 100
Cal. gas value, ppm
Acceptable limit = < 2% of calibration gas value (< 5% for THC)
***
Drift, % Span
(Post-test cal. response - initial cal. response) x 100
Span value
Acceptable limit < 3% of span
Minimum detectable limit« 2% of span or ppm or % (circle one)
Maximum zero drift = % of span or ppm or % (circle one)
Maximum calibration drift » % of span or ppm or % (clrde one)
COMMENTS: Pretest or post-test (circle one) calibration used to quantitate
sample data Post-test is used if drift exceeds limits and if post-test
yields higher concentrations.
-------
APPENDIX A.2.3
Condition 1 Method 25A
-------
DAILY CEM CALIBRATION AND PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
Plant:
Location:
Date:
Parameter: SO2,
Monitor:
, O2,
Operator:
Project #:
Time, Pretest: /o:2G Post-test: /j.'zo
Run#:
Span Value: 100
Chart Scale: o
Pbar, in. Hg.:
Ambient Temp., F:
rr
Cyl.
#
Cal. Ga.
Cone.,
jlprrpor %
0
7737
14/8
4-SO-7
C*iibratiora (Chart Divisions)
/7-2C) i^-.ss ir.so icy.-2.o
O. 1 0. 1 0. I O."*3
3S,fc 33 fl -vU -*4.
-------
3BC3
GEM DATA REDUCTION - BAG ANALYSIS OR STEADY READINGS
Plant:
Location:
Date: 5 -
Parameter: SO2, CO2, O2, NOx*(^fHCjCO
Operator: _ /? .
r7,5
5-8.5
5-?
54
55
^U
55
S4
SI)
.-r^s
S3
SS
SL
S5.^
tt
Concentration
//"
J7
3<037
2^g?
2%<0'L
2^/Z.
213"7
2L.87
Z737
2.787
2.757
2.t,g7
Zt»2>b
2-L.^I
2.737
2.7^7
2.767
27^*2.
2737
Comments
:r\jL*vv i
^./^ - ^;a
/^ u Adjufr
-M*. aax^>
AMfc- 2?£>2 aa/nffaca.ne
KsJ
-------
INITIAL CEM CALIBRATION AND PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
Plant: |_r\6CO
Parameter: SO2, C02, O2.
Location:
Date: c
Operator:
Project #:
PYMlsi Exv\kUf>T
;_(4 _C\-|
P. Sie&ei_
S405. D03
Monitor: <{5pr^or %
Span Value: 100
Chart Scale: o - sooo ppiv
Pbar, in. Hq.: za.fto
» Pr&p«tr\e.
r
Cylinder
#
M.«*OO54l£
AAJKoiotmA
AAl/b34-S
Cal. Gas
Cone.,
^pm)or %
O
ITS'/
24I&
4507
Chart Divisions
Direct
Injection
to Monitor
4.6
J4.7
48.8
•to. 5
Injection
Through
System
G.C>
33.c?
47.^
38. -2.
Concentration
Predicted by
Equation,*
Direct System
O.k O.k>
/72& /t>&0>
3423 J384
4^t>^ 4310
1
Calibration
Error,**
% oHDpflH
^A
-------
DAILY CEM CALIBRATION AND PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
Location:
Date:
Parameter: SO2,CO2,Q2,
Monitor: ^ppgfror %
Operator: p. •
Project #:
.
QQ 2
Span Value: 100
Chart Scale: &-^
Pbar, in. Hg.:
Time, Pretest: ig».4S Post-test: O0i4g> Ambient Temp., F:
Run#:ME-2.-i
Cyl.
#
Cal. Gas
Cone..
0
/7^7
3
4-S6-7
.
Calibration* (Chart Divisions)
/9-V< j/:4n 25! if, on:<4Z
0.0 O.I 0.7. o.l
33.
Drift,*"*
% of Span
O.'Z.
/• 2.
* Perform linear regression of pretest cat. gas concentration vs. chart divisions to
determine the following equation:
y « mx + b x = ppm y «= chart divisions
For Data Reduction:
Pollutant, ppm/% = (Chart Division - b) =
m
Correlation Coefficient =
Analyzer cal. error, % cal. gas value = (Cal. gas cone. - cone, predicted) x 100
Cal. gas value, ppm
Acceptable limit = < 2% of calibration gas value (< 5% for THC)
*** Drift, % Span = (Post-test cal. response • initial cal. response) x 100
Span value
Acceptable limit < 3% of span
Minimum detectable limit = 2% of span or ppm or % (circle one)
Maximum zero drift = % of span or ppm or % (cirde one)
Maximum calibration drift = % of span or ppm or % (circle one)
COMMENTS: Pretest or post-test (drde one) calibration used to quantitate
sample data. Post-test Is used If drift exceeds limits and if post-test
yields higher concentrations.
-------
— CEM DATA REDUCTION - BAG ANALYSIS OR STEADY READINGS
Plant: LK
Po
Run
#
tf£-2-/
K6-2.--2-
ME-2.-^
,,,,tant rrm/o,0 _ (Chart Division - b) _ (CD -40*3)
miranr.ppm/,. ^ . (0.0,161 }
Time**
(24-Hr)
2#20-20.':v:>
- 20 •• 40
-lo'-SO
-7.V '.00
-2.1 : i o
-7.I-. 2-S
Zl'.oo-^-z.'. i^
-Z-i-.T-O
-^•i'.^Q
-2-^:-4o
- Z-2.'. SC>
-r-V.rv-7
2?,: 2^ -2V. 4o
- 21 : ^r>
00
n*-Mno
00
-4-4-./0
--^;7o
-oo:^r»
Average
Chart
Division
£2.
s-/
41
44.
2SZ^5
2.^q.
AM/^ - 2 544 ppwv Prop
Ml£r 2S48 ^,p-* rmpa
'
fry//^ ^3>74 rP^ Pro^
h*4_
^*
^
* For NOX Indicate whether NO, NO 4- NO2, or NO2 for specific interval.
**
Indicate whether time interval is from beginning of first time to beginning
of second time or to end of second time (circle one, or describe alternate).
Calculated Bv: /SL v ~T^ ^^ (s
Checked Bv: o
Date:.
Date:
-------
INITIAL CEM CALIBRATION AND PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
Plant: LK6CQ
Location:
Date:
Parameter: SO2,CO2,O2, NO)
Monitor:
_5-
Operator:
Project #:
P.
Span Value: 100
Chart Scale: o
Pbar, in. Hg.: 2g.
s-sn
Injection
Through
System
0.0
/7.U
£S.t>
Calculation concentration predicted by equatio using actual chart response
obtained from each calibration gas response.
Analyzer cal. error, % cal. gas value =
(Cal. gas cone., ppm - cone, predicted, ppm) x 100
***
Cal. gas value, ppm
• Acceptable limit = < 2% of calibration gas value (< 5% for THC)
Sampling system bias = (Direct Meet gas cone. - System inject, gas cone.) x 100
Span value
Acceptable limit < 5% of span
Minimum detectable limit = 2% of span or /O ppm or % (circle one)
Rise time to 95% of response for high cal. gas injected through the system
(return to zero after each injection): s, s, s Average = £9 s
Precision, % scale = difference in chart division response for two repeated
injections of the gas concentrations • - • %
(Clock time «= )
-------
DAILY CEM CALIBRATION AND PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
Plant:
Location:
Date:
Parameter: SO2, CO2, O2,
Monitor:
-i
Span Value: 100
Operator:
Project #:
Time, Pretest:
Run#: ftr-l.
Post-test:
Chan: Scale: Q-SQO
Pbar, in. Hg.:
Ambient Temp., F:
R£-i-2.
Cyl.
#
Cal. Gas
Cone.,
(pfSrWpr %
O
64. OA
210. S
4u-b.S
Calibrations (Chart Divisions)
fl'.lD l^:iS H'.46 i^.^
ft.D 1.0 0.«> O.-i
n.u
^«5.b
4?>.-7 ^^o qi.?> q4 o
Concentration Predicted
By Equation*
&-io \Q:I«=, ir.4^) IT,: -4-5
-t.°i 3.0 0.^ -o.S
85.1
n^.l
4t,i.u 4cA.o A^n.\ 44,3.1
Analyzer
Calibration
Error,"
% of Span
l.o-l
O.^t,
DrHf-
% of Span
/.&
/,**>
* Perform linear regression of pretest cal. gas concentration vs. chart divisions to
determine the following equation:
y » mx + b x = ppm y = chart divisions
For Data Reduction:
Pollutant, ppm/% = (Chart Division - b) =
( o. ZOT.»S )
Correlation Coefficient =
Analyzer cal. error, % cal. gas value
(Cal. gas cone. -cone, predicted) x 100
Cal. gas value, ppm
Acceptable limit = < 2% of calibration gas value (< 5% for THC)
***
Drift, % Span
(Post-test cal. response - initial cal. response) x 100
Span value
Acceptable limit < 3% of span
Minimum detectable limit = 2% of span or ppm or % (circle one)
Maximum zero drift = % of span or ppm or % (circle one)
Maximum calibration drift = % of span or ppm or % (circle one)
COMMENTS: Pretest or post-test (circle one) calibration used to quantitate
sample data. Post-test is used if drift exceeds limits and if post-test
yields higher concentrations.
-------
13 a S3
DAILY GEM CALIBRATION AND PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
Pl3nt:
Location:
Date:
Parameter: SO2,CO2,O2, NOx,
Monitor:
Operator:
Project #:
Time, Pretest:
Run #:
Post-test:
Span Value: 100
Chart Scale: _^
Pbar, in. Hg.:
Ambient Temp., F:
Cyl.
#
Cal.Ga»
Cone.,
6
£f.o8
-2-70.5
4k?>.^
Calibrations (Chart Divisions)
/£:<£ /3-'4< //.'• 3 o. £ Q.O
n.±
52.?, ss. k
A^.2. 4*f.O 12.& 31,7
Concentration Predicted
By Equation"
/&:^^ /-*:4< //;4^ A'./O
Analyzer
Calibration
Error,"
% of Span
DrHf-
% of Span
O.3
3.3
4.S
* Perform linear regression of pretest cal. gas concentration vs. chart divisions to
determine the following equation:
y « mx + b x = ppm y = chart divisions
For Data Reduction:
Pollutant, ppm/% = (Chart Division - b) = (CD- )
m ( )
Correlation Coefficient =
** Analyzer cal. error, % cal. gas value = (Cal. gas cone. - cone, predicted) x 100
Cal. gas value, ppm
.
Acceptable limit = < 2% of calibration gas value (< 5% for THC)
*** Drift, % Span =
(Post-test cal. response - initial cal. response) x 100
Span value
Acceptable limit < 3% of span
Minimum detectable limit = 2% of span or ppm or % (circle one)
Maximum zero drift = % of span or ppm or % (circle one)
Maximum calibration drift - % of span or ppm or % (circle one)
COMMENTS: Pretest or post-test (drcte one) calibration used to quantitate
sample data, Post-test is used If drift exceeds limits and if post-test
yields higher
tratic
cuncernrouena
-------
JLSSU
fc—c
GEM DATA REDUCTION - BAG ANALYSIS OR STEADY READINGS
Plant:
Location:
Date:
Parameter: SO2, C02, O2. NOX*CTHC)CO
Operator:
Project #\
Pollutant, ppm/% = (Chart Division - b) =
m
(6.2.0-Z-lS )
Run
#
**-/-7
«f-/-2
tf£-/-3
Time**
(24-Hr)
/i>'-tf'/o:4Q
-/o.-'rf
-//.'&O-I2'-4O
-12'. SO
-l^-.oo
-i-V. in
-li'.T-O
-i^-. -?>o
iS'.^O-l^.^ft
-ILIDC5
-IU-.IO
-IU-.2.0
-It:^0
-IU40
Average
Chart
Division
36
77
7^
IB
77
14
m
12)
^
1-7
1Z
70
72.
•7\
72.
73
72.
77
Concentration
/$*"
3^4
37^?
314
^>84
31^
3U4
3S4
35^
2>^
31^
7,54
•^4-4-
^^"4
3S GLT£-
^2 ^\^drci a. ^-^t
o$ the. <\«Jrcvlo3^er
M/^,= 311 ppr^^o
A\/6= -a,?*^ pp«> rrop
Atv&'= 3$£~arii»t rr*p**
* For NOX Indicate whether NO, NO + NO2, or NO2 for specific interval.
**
Indicate whether time interval is from beginning of first time to beginning
of second time or to end of second time (circle one, or describe alternate).
Calculated By:
ChecKed By:_
Date:
Date:
-------
APPENDIX A.2.4
Condition 2 Method 25A
-------
LASCO Panel Products
Condition 2 - Main Exhaust
Total Hydrocarbons (THC)
14-May-97
Calibration Gases
0.0 ppm
1737.0 ppm
2418.0 ppm
4507.0 ppm
System Calibration
-2
1697
2385
4408
Direct Calibration
-2
1735
2442
4504
Correlation 0.9999832
Slope 0.9790131
Intercept 1.9470266
Sampling System Bias
"0.00%
0.76%
1.14%
1.92%
Correlation 0.9999751
Slope 1.0004054
Intercept 3.3722138
Calibration Error
0.35%
0.81%
2502
20:20-21:20 Run 2-1
21:30 PostCal
22:00-23:00 Run 2-2 | 2511
23:10 PostCal
2330
23:30-00:30 Run 2-3
h^^M^^^^^^^H
0:39 Post Cal
Corrected 2554 ppm THC
17
2346
Drift 0.38%
0.78%
Corrected 2563 ppm THC
17
2385
Drift 0.38%
0.00%
Corrected 2378 ppm THC
17
2346
Drift 0.38%
0.78%
Page 1
-------
P
p
M
P
R
0
P
A
N
E
4500-
4000-
3500
3000
aooo
1500
1000
500
0
LflSCO Panel Products
4M4
Direct 97.£«-l8.e0 MAIN EXHAUST CHH-nti)
P
p
n
p
R
o
p
A
N
E
5000-
4500
4000
3500
3000
3000
1500
1000
500
0
LftSCO Pane! Products
System Cal Deration Drift Check
Calibration Gases
0.0 ppn
3418 ppn
17
3346
. I
-,.
- 1
. I
31'33
ppm H Mav'97.21'30-56
21i34
31 '36 31 '38
MAIN EXHAUST
21<40
21-42
-------
p
p
n
p
R
0
p
A
N
E
P
P
n
p
p
A
N
E
4508
4000
3508
3000
2500
2000
1500
1000
508
e
I
LflSCO Panel Products
Run ME-2-2 22 '00 - 23 '00
~"~
Mean 2511 ppn Propane
^ ' l_^~^r-»
*^-*~~~~-^-»* "--%J-«rWV-
22'80 22= 10 22=S0 22=30 22=40 22'50
ppn 14 Mag -97. 21 =58 = 80 MAIN EXHAUST (HH'MII)
30U0
4500
4800
3508
3800
2500
2000
1500
1000
500
LASCO Panel Products
System Calibration Drift Check
Calibraticn Gases
0.8 ppn
2418 ppn
2385
1
I
1
17 1
23'11 23=12 23=13 23-14 33=15 23=16 23=17 23=18 23=19
ppn 14 May'97,23= 10=56 MAIN EXHAUST (HH'MII)
p
p
n
p
•
0
p
A
-N
E
5808
4508
4808
3508
3808
2508
2000
1508
1808
508
8
LASCO Panel Products
Run ME-2-3 23 '30 - 00 '30
Mean 2330 ppn Propane
^^>ri_T -ow/~Xj - n r-|_n™_j»j
23'38 23'48
14 Mav'97.23.28'80
23150 e>ee
MAIN EXHAUST
(HH'MH)
-------
p
p
n
p
R
o
p
A
N
E
4500-
4900
3500
3800
8500
2000
1500
1000
500
0
pm
i
LrtSCO Panel Products
Systen Calibration Drift Check
Calibration Gases
0,0 ppn
8418 ppn
/
8346
V
L
0.40 0:48 8'44 0^46 0-48 0:50
15 May '97, &0:39: 05 MAIN EXHAUST
-------
LASCO Panel Products
Condition 2 - Room Exhaust
Total Hydrocarbons (THC)
14-May-97
Calibration Gases
0.0 ppm
84.1 ppm
270.5 ppm
463.3 ppm
System Calibration
-0.2
86.8
270.1
458.0
Direct Calibration
-0.2
89.1
274.7
467.1
Correlation 0.9999561
Slope 0.9868021
Intercept 1.9035815
Sampling System Bias
0.00%
0.38%
0.77%
1.52%
Correlation 0.9999519
Slope 1.0054633
Intercept 2.0879183
Calibration Error
2.92%
0.23%
20:20-21:23 Run 2-132T7"
Corrected 324.1 ppm THC
Calibration Gases
0.0 ppm
270.5 ppm
463.3 ppm
System Calibration
2.1
286.1
476.3
Calibration Error
1.70%
Correlation 0.9998523
Slope 1.025233
Intercept 4.0613468
22:00-23:00 Run 2-2 \ 448~9"
23:05
Corrected 433.9 ppm THC
Post Cal
23:00-00:30 Run 2-3 I 434.0
11.2
290.7
Drift 1.52%
0.77%
Corrected 419.4 ppm THC |
0:37
Post Cal
11.2
293.0
Drift 1.52%
1.15%
Pace 1
-------
p
p
n
p
R
o
p
ft
N
E
538. 8
M0.e
458.0
489.8
c-sa.e
;ae. e
£50.6
£38. 0
150.0
189.0
50.8
0.0
ppm
LASCO Parwl
467.1
274.7
89.1
Products
Direct vs. System Calibratior
Calibration Casts
463.3 ppn
278.5 ppn
84.88 ppn
8.00 ppn
is
"~ 458.8 \
270. 1
86.8
-8.2
18>56 18-58 19-80 19-02 19'64 19 '06 19-08 19' 10
14 Hav'97.18'54'34 ROOM EXHAUST
p
p
N
P
R
0
P
ft
N
E
€80.
KG,
?ee.
450,
408,
238,
280,
£•50,
£B8
158
100
50
0
LASCO Panel Products
Run RE-2-1 28<20 - HI'23
Mean 321.7 ppn Propane
28 '20 20' 2
14 May'97.£0>18<00
20>40 20'50
ROOM EXHAUST
21 --00
21 '
ai'28
(HH'MM)
-------
p
p
n
p
R
o
p
A
N
E
550.0-
M0.0
459.0
488. 8
C-50.0
388.0
£50.0
£60.0
150.8'
100.0
50.0
e.e
LflSCO Panel Products
Systen Calibration Drift Check
Calibration Gases •
8.08 ppn
270.5 ppn
463.3 ppn
3.1
286.1
1
n
476.3
ppn
21'38
14 May'97,21'27°30
21-35
21'48
ROOM EXHAUST
21'45
21'58
(HH-I1I1)
P
P
tl
P
R
0
P
A
N
E
LASCO Panel Products
Run RE-2-2 22'08 - 23'08
22100 22'10
ppn 14 May'97.21'58'08
22 -20 22 • 38
ROOM EXHAUST
22'48
22'50
nn>
P
p
n
p
R
0
p
A
N
E
550.0
500.0
450.0
400.0
330.0
380.0
£50.0
£88.0
150.0
100.0
50.0
0.0
1
LASCO Panel Products
S vi ten Calibration Drift Check
Calibration Cases
0.00 ppn
270.5 ppn
290.7
r~ \
\
\
11.2 I
PP«
23-06 23-07
14 May'97.23-05'43
23 '08
23 '09 23-18
ROOM EXHAUST
23' 11
23-12 23-13
•
-------
p
p
n
p
R
0
P
A
N
E
LASCO Panel Products
Run RE-2-3 23'39 - 00-30
/^^
Mean 434.8 ppn Prcpane
PP"
33'30 33'40
14 nay'97,23'28<88
23-58 0^88
ROOM EXHAUST
8-18
0-28
-------
INITIAL CEM CAUBRATION AND PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
Plant:
Location: \<>oot
Date: 5-\4 -<
Parameter: SO2. CO2, Q2, NOXiCtH§)
Monitor:
Operator: ft <.ie.fc.tLL.
Project #: $465.003.
Span Value: 100
Chart Scale: Q_
Pbar, in. Hg.:_
.e4
^ 2A-
•boS
Cylinder
#
fcUAOlWafcO
WkUTlO
KKUfcSli
Cal. Gas
Cone
^jjjj" •**•?
(£pm)or%
0
a4.oa
nr>.^
4-t?,.'^
Chart Divisions
Direct
Injection
to Monitor
0.0
/8.o
^5". fe
f-y.fe
Injection
Through
Syatem
o.O
Concentration
Predicted by
Equation,"
Direct System
-Z.I -2,L
/7.Y I At,.?. A?».4
3-4.Z
72.4
211.0 l\r***r.\^
4«..b 452.8
Calibration
Error,"
% of "Span
&A<>
2.t*4
^>. /A
Sampling
System
Bias,"*
% of Span
£.£>
£,A
/.3
2,0
* Perform linear regression of pretest cal. gas concentration vs. chart divisions to
determine the following equation:
y = mx + b x = ppm y = chart divisions
For Data Reduction:
Pollutant, ppm/% = (Chart Division' b> -
m
Correlation Coefficient =
Calculation concentration predicted by equatio using actual chart response
obtained from each calibration gas response.
** Analyzer cal. error, % cal. gas value = (Cah qas conc- ppm ' conc' Predictsd'
Cal. gas value, ppm
Acceptable limit = < 2% of calibration gas value ( < 5% for THC)
x 10°
***
Sampling system bias = (Direc* inject, gas cone. - System inject, gas cone.) x 100
Span value
Acceptable limit < 5% of span
Minimum detectable limit = 2% of span or
ppm or % (circle one)
Rise time to 95% of response for high cal. gas injected through the system
(return to zero after each injection): s, s, s Average = 23 s
Precision, % scale = difference in chart division response for two repeated
injections of the gas concentrations « - » %
(Clock time = )
-------
-j aea cj
DAILY GEM CALIBRATION AND PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
Plant: L
Location:
Date:
Parameter: SO2, CO?, Q2,
Monitor: f0pn£or %
Operator: -p. ^.g
Project*:
Time, Pretest:
Run #:
Span Value: 100
Chart Scale: /o-sco
Pbar, in. Hg.:
M/
Pr
Post-test: 00:40 Ambient Temp., F:
Cyl.
a*
^
i
Cal. Ga.
Cone.,
0
^.84.0?
^70.-?
^2».^
CAlibratiom tfChAft OK/lninnnl
/^.'/O -y/.'2/7V
J5-V.?, <;^.A ^.7
4,7 1
* Perform linear regression of pretest cat. gas concentration vs. chart divisions to
determine the following equation:
y » mx + b x = ppm y «= chart divisions
For Data Reduction:
Pollutant, ppm/% = (Cnart Division - b) = (CD-0.23 7)
m
Correlation Coefficient =
Analyzer cal. error, % cal. gas value = (Cal. gas cone. - cone, predicted) x 100
Cal. gas value, ppm
Acceptable limit = < 2% of calibration gas value (< 5% for THC)
***
Drift % Span =
(Post-test cal. response • initial cal. response) x 100
Span value
Acceptable limit < 3% of span
Minimum detectable limit = 2% of span or ppm or % (cirde one)
Maximum zero drift = . % of span or ppm or % (circle one)
Maximum calibration drift = % of span or ppm or % (circle one)
COMMENTS: Pretest or post-test (circle one) calibration used to quantttate
sample data. Post-test is used if drift exceeds limits and if post-test
yields higher concentrations.
-------
— GEM DATA REDUCTION - BAG ANALYSIS OR STEADY READINGS
Plant:
•-oc
Date:
Parameter: SO2, C02, O2. NOx*.(tHClcO
Operator:
Project #:
Pollutant ppm/%
= (Chart Division - b) =
m
Run
RE-7.-I
RE -2. -2.
RE-z-^
Time**
(24-Hr)
2o:ao-M»-^
-2^:/^
- 9^. t TJO
Average
Chart
Division
^7
^5-5
1*2.
&•*>
K
43
/£>2.
41
^^j ^^
77
f^
4o
&s
d&
Concentration
32,4 S
^i ^> ^_l ^^
^1 o / ^3
3T.q S
314,4
30A.4
4l4.1
4^4 q
5IO.O
/{ ^_A QL
"TL ^^ x 1 . /
44^,9,
/L+j A * 7
4/4.-?
Comments
ZTcXrw 6
A\I4, - 324.*? tfnnA. Viof
.ckxia — -; — " ' rr"^ llwt
fl
tsux v ,w ffainfiirn
W<^>- ^33 1/ Mm /?fl^i
«4
* For NOX Indicate whether NO, NO + N02, or NO2 for specific interval.
**
Indicate whether time interval is from beginning of first time to beginning
of second time or to end of second time (circle one, or describe alternate).
Calculated By:.
Checked By:_
Date:
Date/
---zo-17
-------
INITIAL CEM CALIBRATION AND PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
Plant:
Location:
Date:
Parameter: SO2, CO2, 02,
Monitor: d5pm>r%
Operator:
Project #:
P.
Span Value: 100
Chart Scale: QJ
Pbar, in. Hg.:
Cylinder
#
MlAOltt&O
AAL110
AMI&51i
Cal. Gas
Cone.,
^gjp or %
O
84.08
27ft. S
4Lb.?>
'A. •--.. ' ..
•fj ;.. .
Chan Divisions
Direct
Injection
to Monitor
o.o
/7.0
^4.2.
?2.9
. >v
,:
!
1
Injection
Through
System
o.e>
/L.&
^3,O
<9O.C>
.....,-i
Concentration
Predicted by
Equation,"
Direct System
-0.^ -0.1>
M.t> S?i.fc>
270.2. 1U4.Z.
4U15.4- 44ft fl
Calibration
Error,""
% orGpan
&**,-*>
O.U2.
& . I I
Sampling
System
Bias,"**
% of Span
0.0
4.2.
1.2.
1.9
* Perform linear regression of pretest cal. gas concentration vs. chart divisions to
determine the following equation:
y = mx + b x- ppm y = chart divisions
For Data Reduction:
Pollutant, ppm/% . (Chart Division - b) _ (CD- s
Precision, % scale = difference in chart division response for two repeated
injections of the gas concentrations = - = %
(Clock time - )
-------
DAILY GEM CALIBRATION AND PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
Plant:
Location:
Date:
Operator: P.
Project*
Time, Pretest:
Run #
Parameter: SOa, CO2,
Monitor: 45prg)or%
Span Value: 100
Post-test:
Chart Scale: r>-^oo
Pbar, in. Hg.: 2fi
Ambient Temp., F: loc F
Cyl.
#
Cal. Gas
Cone.,
ppm or %
O
-3*34.0*
nn.s
41, -^
Calibrations (Chart Divisions}
8-45 ir.os 1-4: o^ n :•>%<,
0.0 O.O -l/o.o OO
IL.&
55,0 5?>71 -?i.«/<;4..6 ^rtr?
40.0
Concentration Predicted
By Equation*
S:4S IT.-&S i4:oS i7:£
-/.4 _/.V -H.T/-I.4 -1.4
ac 2.
ZTl."7 2.7^. "X Zlafa.l/nfc.^ ZS(.a
4U^.4
Analyzer
Calibration
Error/"
% of Scan
A A3
0.44
DrMt—
% of Span
* Perform linear regression of pretest cal. gas concentration vs. chart divisions to
determine the following equation:
y «= mx + b x = ppm y = chart divisions
For Data Reduction:
Pollutant, ppm/% = (Chart Division - b) = (CD-o.2.7^)
m
(0./14DS)
Correlation Coefficient =
**
Analyzer cal. error, % cal. gas value = (Cal. gas cone. - cone, predicted) x 100
Cal. gas value, ppm
Acceptable limit = < 2% of calibration gas value (< 5% for THC)
***
Drift, % Span
(Post-test cal. response - initial cal. response) x 100
Span value
Acceptable limit < 3% of span
Minimum detectable limit = 2% of span or ppm or % (circle one)
Maximum zero drift = % of span or ppm or % (cirde one)
Maximum calibration drift « % of span or ppm or % (circle one)
COMMENTS: Pretest or post-test (cirde one) calibration used to quantitate
sample data. Post-test Is used if drift exceeds limits and if post-test
yields higher concentrations.
fit
-------
GEM DATA REDUCTION - BAG ANALYSIS OR STEADY READINGS
Plant: |
Location:
Date:
i\mj
Parameter: SO2, C02, O2, NOx*,(fHC;)CO
Operator:
Project #:
Pollutant, ppm/% = (Chart Division - b) = (CD-,.27£)
m
Run
#
AP-i-i
AF - 1 - 2.
AF-l-^
Time**
(24-Hr)
/o.-3
0.7~
a./
fi./
/)./
2.0
2.5
2.$
Concentration
W
r~>
&
D
O
o
o
D
o
n
ft
r>
o
o
o
o
M/k
KiK
K)K
Comments
Tan 3
kw>bvfcrf\rt~ Air oCA
A*xxvV\VrV F
-------
INITIAL CEM CALIBRATION AND PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
Plant:
Location:
Date: 5
PA»J
Parameter: SO2, C02, O2,
Monitor: cfipfrTpr %
100
Operator:
Project #:
P.
Span Value:
Chart Scale:
Pbar, in. Hq.: 28.z7
Cylinder
#
AlMC^WofcO
AM--UD
AM_Vfc5l?>
Cal. Gas
^ppm)or%
O
B4.D&
L16.S
4b%,'?>
Chart Divisions
Olract
Injection
to Monitor
0.0
'?•*/
5*f.%
93.1
Injection
Through
System
0.0
/"7.Q
>5V.<3
^2.0
Concentration
Predicted by
Equation,*
Direct System
-/. 3 -/- 3
&*Z.~*> S3>.3>
21t.*l 2.feD . 4
4I»-L.(=> 4^&.(=,
Calibration
Error,"
% of Gpan
/.4S
^.33
Sampling
Syitem
Bias,-"
% of Span
O.Q
0.4
&.&
/,2.
Perform linear regression of pretest caJ. gas concentration vs. chart divisions to
determine the following equation:
y a mx + b x = ppm y = chart divisions
For Data Reduction:
Pollutant, ppm/% = (Chart Division - b) a (CD-,.
m
Correlation Coefficient =
Calculation concentration predicted by equatio using actual chart response
obtained from each calibration gas response.
** Analyzer cai. error, % cat. gas value =
(CaJ. gas cone., ppm - cone, predicted, ppm) x 100
***
Cal. gas value, ppm
Acceptable limit = < 2% of calibration gas value (< 5% for THC)
Sampling system bias = (Direct inject gas cone. - System inject, gas cone.) x 100
Span value
Acceptable limit < 5% of span
Minimum detectable limit = 2% of span or //O ppm or % (circle one)
Rise time to 95% of response for high cat. gas injected through the system
(return to zero after each injection): $, s, s Average • 2.3 s
Precision, % scale = difference in chart division response for two repeated
injections of the gas concentrations » • = %
(Clock time «= )
n i
-------
DAILY CEM CALIBRATION AND PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
Plant:
Location:
Date:
Parameter:
, NOX.<
luyinwJ^Monitor:
~"~ 7 S
Operator: /?.
Project #: i
Time, Pretest:
#:
Span Value: 100
Chart Scale: _^
Pbar, in. Hg.:
Post-test: go.-s-p Ambient Temp., F:
/\
ii
\OM
Cyl.
#
Cal.Gaa
Cone.,
(^prrfjor %
*
S4.0A
2.10. S
4ti.7»
Calibrations (Chart Divisions)
/f.'20 i/.W^ 2^:2< ^/>;<-o
0.O 2.3 2.S it-,
/7.0
S4.0 S4.I <;&.*, u^.r,
92.0
Concentration Predicted
By Equation*
~O,I /OH 71.7 IT-,~i-
24.9,
211,7. Z^bfl 1^3^ ^01.5
4b2.n
Analyzer
Calibration
Error,-"
%ofSoan
O.&b
0. "2-h
DrHl«~
% of Span
2^.1>
f.f
* Perform linear regression of pretest cat. gas concentration vs. chart divisions to
determine the following equation:
y « mx + b x =» ppm y «= chart divisions
For Data Reduction:
pmi.minf ppm™. ,
-------
- GEM DATA REDUCTION - BAG ANALYSIS OR STEADY READINGS
Plant:
Location:
Date:
Parameter: SO2. C02, Q3.
Operator:
Project #:
CO
A j
Pollutant, ppm/%
_ (Chart Division • b) _ (CD-a. /7fe)
m
Run
#
AF-i-i
AF-z-2.
KF-Z-?,
Time**
(24-Hr)
20.'20-2.0.'T>0
-z.o:
-2X!r^
2-a.:^A-9-v-.^o
-2*:
-------
APPENDIX A.2.5
Condition 3 Method 25A
-------
LASCO Panel Products
Condition 3 - Main Exhaust
Total Hydrocarbons (THC)
IS-May-97
Calibration Gases
0.0 ppm
1737.0 ppm
2418.0 ppm
4507.0 ppm
System Calibration
-2.0
1697.0
2385.0
4389.0
Direct Calibration
-2.0
1735.0
2461.0
4523.0
Calibration Gases
0.0 ppm
1737.0 ppm
2418.0 ppm
Correlation 0.9999668
Slope 0.9747434
Intercept 6.4432425
Sampling System Bias
0.00%
0.76%
1.52%
2.68%
Correlation 0.9999486
Slope 1.0051356
Intercept 2.628915
Calibration Error
0.78%
1.15%
727.0 Corrected 739.2 ppm THC
System Calibration
-2.0
1659.0
2327.0
Calibration Error
0.45%
Correlation 0.9999841
Slope 0.9618267
Intercept -4.1300292
Calibration Gases
0.0 ppm
270.5 ppm
463.3 ppm
886.7 ppm
System Calibration
-0.4
274.5
465.5
889.3
Calibration Error
0.82%
0.01%
Correlation 0.9999908
Slope 1.0024036
Intercept 1.1262325
16:00-17:00 Run 3-2 | 741.0
17:12 PostCal
Corrected 738.1 ppm THC
-0.4
469.3
Drift 0.00%
0.38%
17:35-18:35 Run 3-3 | 701.4
18:46 PostCal
Corrected 698.6 ppm THC
3.5
465.5
Drift 0.39%
0.00%
Paw ',
-------
p
p 3500 •
M
3000
R 250a
r\
jj 2000
A 1500
N
E 1008
500
Calibration Gases
4507 ppn
2418 ppn
1737 ppn
\ 2461 0 ppn 2385 ;
1735 1697
v I \
2
"2 I -2
|
12'16 12=18 12=20 12=22 12-24 12=26 12-£8 12<30 12.32
ppn 15 May'97, 12= 15 = 54 MAIM EXHAUST (HH-MM)
50001 ^~~~
4500
4000
P
p 3500
N
3000
p
r, 2500
R
0 2000
P
A 1500
N
E 1000
500
0
LftSCO Panel Products
Rijn ME-3-1 14 = 25-15 = 25
Mean 727 ppn Propane
14' 30 14'40 14=50 15=00 15=16 15=20
ppn 15 May'97. 14.23. 00 MA IN EXHAUST
50081 "~™~"~
4508
4000
P
p 3500
3000
P „„
R
J 2800
P
A 1500
-N
E 1808
500
•
0
LASCO Panel Products 1
Systen Calibration Drift Check 1
1
Calibration Gases
2418 ppn
0 ppn
1737 ppn
2327
1659
If \\
\ "2
1
IS
15'28 15.30
May'97,IS>86•29
13.32 15.34 15>36
HAIH EXHAUST
15'38
13-40
m>
-------
p
p
n
p
0
p
A
N
E
980.0
£88.8
708.8
£88.8
v«v* D
408.8
388.8
£80.0
100.0
0.0
LflSCO Panel Products System Calibration Drift Check '
^^_ ^_^ Calibration Ga»«
889.3 886.7 ppn
463.3 ppn
270.5 ppn
0.0 ppn
.
465.5 1
1
\
274.5
\ -0.4
15144 15'46 15^48 15.50 15=52 15'54
ppn 13 nav'97. 15.43-40 MAIN EXHAUST (HH-IW)
P
P
n
P
R
0
P
A
N
E
P
P
n
p
0
p
A
N
E
iroo.u
£89.0
700.0
£80.0
J88.8
400.8
380.0
£88.0
188.0
0.8
I
LflSCO Panel Products
Run ME-3-8 . 16'00 - 17.00
A>~^*''w"'*^v>''*-*w'"^™*>'^-—^
Mean 741.0 ppn Propane
16'00 16' 16 16'80 16'30 16'40 16'50
ppn 15 May'97,15'58'00 MAIN EXHAUST (HH-MM)
leea.e
980.8
£88.8
780.8
680.8
508.8
480.8
380.8
£80.0
108.8
0M
.8
1
ppn
1
LftSCO Panel Products
Systen Calibration Drift Check
Calibration Cases
463.3 ppn
0.0 ppn
469.3
M \
\
i \ -0-4
/ L_
7-13 17-14 17-15 17-16 17-17 17-18 17-19 17-20 17-21 17-22 17-23
13 Haw '97. 17-12 • 53 MAIN EXHAUST (HH'HH)
-------
p
p
n
p
R
0
p
N
E
p
p
n
p
0
p
A
N
E
1CC0.0'
W0.0
£88.0
700.0
600.0
500.0
400.8
380.0
£00.0
100.0
0.0
ppn
iee0.0'
£00.0
700.0
600.0
M0.0
400.0
380.0
£80.0
LASCO Panel Products
Run l-E-3-3 17 '35 - 18*35
•"^^^^^
Mean 701,4 ppn Propane
'40 17-50 18>00 18' 10 18 '£0 18 '30
15 May '97, 17' 33<00 MAIN EXHAUST (HH'Mn)
I
LASCO Panel Producfs
Systen Calibraticn Drift Check
Calibration Gas«s
463.3 ppn
0.0 ppn
465.5
-------
LASCO Panel Products
Condition 3 - Room Exhaust
Total Hydrocarbons (THC)
15-May-97
Calibration Gases
0.0 ppm
84.1 ppm
270.5 ppm
463.3 ppm
System Calibration
0.1
87.9
280.3
468.5
Direct Calibration
0.1
87.9
282.4
474.7
Correlation 0.9998842
Slope 1.0118497
Intercept 2.3070858
Sampling System Bias
0.00%
0.00%
0.38%
1.13%
Correlation 0.9999334
Slope 1.025507
Intercept 1.5895922
Calibration Error
0.10%
1.23%
115.8
14:25-15:25 Run 3-1
• _. —
15:27 PostCal
Corrected 112.2 ppm THC |
8.5
297.0
Drift 1.53%
3.04%
Calibration Gases
0.0 ppm
84.1 ppm
270.5 ppm
463.3 ppm
System Calibration
8.50
92.10
280.30
466.40
Calibration Error
0.62%
1.16%
Correlation 0.999946
Slope 0.9901762
Intercept 9.3636755
16:00-17:00 Run 3-2 | 138.2
17:09 PostCal
Corrected 130.1 ppm THC |
,0.5
276.1
Drift 1.45%
0.76%
17:35-18:35 Run 3-3 | 135.6
18:45 PostCal
Corrected 127.5 ppm THC
8.5
278.2
Drift 0.00%
0.38%
Page!
-------
P 400.0
P
H '358.0
p 388. 8
R £50.8
0
P £80.8
N 158.8
F
& 100.0
59.8
0a .
* V
v <*«4ior«i iwn ud>vs
463.3 ppn
278.5 ppn
84.08 ppn
0.00 ppn \
|f 2K.4 280.3
>'•
f 87'9 I . 87.9 '
[ 0-1 0.1 |
,:
12-48 12-42 12-44 12-46 12-48 12-50
ppm 15 May '97. 12: 38 -15 ROOH EXHAUST (HH-MM)
550. BT ~^~^~"~ ^~~~ ~"
M0.0-
450.0
P 400.0
P
n 3S0.0
p 380.0
R £50.0
0
P £80. 0
N 150.0
^ 100. a
50.0
8.0
Ij
LOSCO Panel Products
Ron RE-3-1 14-25 - 15-25
Mean 115.8 Pfn Propane
_^--^V r^-^X-^-^^,
•^ X^- -~^^^-^ s^. S^~^~^\~.'SJ^ \/
14-30 14-49 14-50 15-00 15-10 15-20
ppn 15 May '97. 14 -23- 00 ROOM EXHAUST
550.8'
708.0-
450.0-
P 400.0
P
M 350.0
p 380.0
R £50.0
0
P £80.0
A
N 158.8
C
*• 100.0
58. 8
0.0
LASCO Panel P redacts
Ssisten Calibration Drift Check
Calibration Ca*«s
0.8 ppn
278.5 ppn
297.0
\
8.S I
V
ppn
131 £8 15-89
15 Mm'97. IS > 27 > S3
15-30
15-31 15-32
ROOM EXHAUST
15-33
15-34
(HH'rfO
-------
P
n
o
p
M8.e-
450.0
408.8
C-50.0
:ae.e
£50.0
£B8.8
158.8
188.8
50.8
8.8
LASCO Panel Products
Systen Calibration
Calibration Cases
8.0 ppn
463.3 ppn
278.5 ppn
84.e8 ppn
8.5
I
^~ 466.4 ]
£€8.3
92.1
PPM
15-48 15-49 15-50
15 Mag'97.15-47-45
15-51 15-52 15=53 15-54 15-55
ROOM EXHAUST
15-56 15-57
(HH'HH)
P
P
n
550.0
M8.0
458.0
400.0
:-38.e
380.0
0
P £90.8
A
N 150.0
E 100.8
50.8
0.0
ppn
LftSCO Panel Products
Run RE-3-2 16-00 - 17-80
Mean 138.E ppn Propane
16-00 16-10
15 May'97.15-58-88
16-20 16-30
ROOM EXHAUST
16 "40
16 '50
P
P
M
0
P
A
see. e
450.0
408.8
sse.e
;a0.e
£ee.e
158.8
188.8
58.8
8.0
ll
LASCO Panel Prcducts
System Calibration Drift Check
Calibration Gases
0.8 ppn
278.5 ppn
8.5
276.1
r v
17-10 17-11
13 (tow'97.17-09'44
17 > 12
17-13 17-14
ROOM EXHAUST
17-15
17-16
17-17
-------
p
p
n
p
R
o
p
N
E
550.0
450.0
400.0
350.0
£50.0
150.0
100.0
50.0
0.0
LASCO Panel Products
Run RE-3-3 17^35 - 18 '35
Mean 135.6 ppn Prcpane
ppm 15 nau'97.17:33-00
18'08 18'IB
ROOM EXHAUST
18'20
18'36
P
P
M
P
R
0
P
A
N
E
M0.e
450.0
488.0
;s8.e
;aer.e
£50.0
158.6
168.8
50.6
0.6
I
LflSCO Panel Products
Systen Calibration Drift Check
Calibration Cases
0.0 ppn
370.5 ppn
3.5
378.2
PPM
18-46 18-48
15 nay "37, 18> 45^37
18'50
ROOM EXHAUST
18-54
18-56
(HH'MM)
-------
INITIAL GEM CALIBRATION AND PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
Plant:
Location:
Date:
Parameter: SO2, CO?, O2, NOX,<
Monitor:
Operator: £.
Project #:
Span Value: 100
Chart Scale: o - sooo
Pbar, in. Hg: 2a.
tTru. lUfel
24-2.S 2.3«o^
4*=5o«5 4"a>UT_
Calibration
Error,"-
% of Ouan
.")
^^kt/3
2.«?
* Perform linear regression of pretest cal. gas concentration vs. chart divisions to
determine the following equation:
y = mx + b x = ppm y = chart divisions
For Data Reduction:
Pollutant, ppm/% = (Chart Division ' b> =
m
(0.010/6)
Correlation Coefficient =
Calculation concentration predicted by equatio using actual chart response
obtained from each calibration gas response.
*• Analyzer cal. error, % cal. gas value = (Cat, gas cone., ppm - cone, predicted, ppm) x 100
Cal. gas value, ppm
Acceptable limit = < 2% of calibration gas value (< 5% for THC)
***
Sampling system bias =
-------
300
DAILY GEM CALIBRATION AND PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
Location:
Date: s -1 s -q "7
Operator:
Project #:
Time, Pretest:
Run*
P. <>.
Post-test:
Parameter: SO2, C02, 02, NO)CS
Monitor: cggrp3or% •__
Span Value: 100
Chart Scale: o-*=;ooe> on™. Prr>rw«
Pbar, in. Hg.: _
Ambient Temp., F: 5"5
Cyl.
#
Cal. Gas
Cone.,
b 1
* Perform linear regression of pretest cal. gas concentration vs. chart divisions to
determine the following equation:
y » mx + b x = ppm
For Data Reduction:
_ (Chart Division - b)
m
y = chart divisions
Pollutant, ppm/% =
Correlation Coefficient =
}
Analyzer cal. error, % cal. gas value
(Cal. gas cone. - cone, predicted) x 100
Cal. gas value, ppm
Acceptable limit = < 2% of calibration gas value (< 5% for THC)
***
Drift, % Span =
(Post-test cal. response - initial cal. response) x 100
Span value
Acceptable limit < 3% of span
Minimum detectable limit = 2% of span or ppm or % (circle one)
Maximum zero drift = • % of span or ppm or % (cirde one)
Maximum calibration drift» % of span or ppm or % (cirde one)
COMMENTS: Pretest or post-test (drde one) calibration used to quantitate
sample data. Post-test is used If drift exceeds limits and if post-test
yields higher concentrate
owns.
-------
DAILY GEM CALIBRATION AND PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
Plant:
Location:
Date:
Parameter: SO2.CO2.O2, NOX, CHC^
Monitor:
Span Value: 100
Operator:
Project #:
Time, Pretest: [£,-.40 Post-test:
Run*: HE.-^-2. ,
Chart Scale: O-/GQO
rr^e^n^.
Pbar, in. Hg.:
Ambient Temp., F:
Cyl.
#
CaLGaa
Cone.,
35gm>ar%
0
270, S
4fe3>.3»
3A<,.-7
Calibration* (Chart Oh/tanna)
1.5:40 IT.VS i%:4-C;
o.i O.-i £.T>
>f^27.|
^t>.\ 4T.O -^A /
ftS.O
Concentration Predicted
By Equation*
i5'-4o n*. v^, iS'««t-s
c».^ ^-.^ ifl
ZTO.T-
4t,(."7 ^feR.l 45<:?i"?
aai.b
Analyzer
Calibration
Error."
% of Span
0. 1 I
O.?iS
Drift*—
% of Span
0.-2.
0.^
* Perform linear regression of pretest cal. gas concentration vs. chart divisions to
determine the following equation:
y « mx + b x = ppm y » chart divisions
For Data Reduction:
Pollutant, ppm/% = (Chart Division - b) = (CD-,.<
m
Correlation Coefficient = A
Analyzer cal. error, % cal. gas value
(Cal. gas cone. - cone, predicted) x 100
Cal. gas value, ppm
Acceptable limit = < 2% of calibration gas value (< 5% for THC)
Drift, % Span =
(Post-test cal. response - initial cal. response) x 100
Span value
Acceptable limit < 3% of span
Minimum detectable limit = 2% of span or pom or % (cirde one)
Maximum zero drift = % of span or ppm or % (drde one)
Maximum calibration drift » % of span or ppm or % (drde one)
COMMENTS: Pretest or post-test (drde one) calibration used to quantttate
sample data. Post-test is used if drift exceeds limits and if post-test
yields higher concentrations.
-------
GEM DATA REDUCTION - BAG ANALYSIS OR STEADY READINGS
Plant: ^<^G Parameter: SO2 , CO2 , O2 , NOX-|
he--b-7-
ME--S-?,
Time**
(24-Hr)
14'. 2.6. -14-'.^
-.4:4^
-l4'.<^
-I^'.Q^
-\<^\i&
-t*'K
Hn\or»-»u-. IQ
-IU-.70
-lU'.^ft
-/*»-.4o
-it,: SO
-IT.OO
n:?»s-n!4*;
- n:«
- ift-.o^
- ifc'. >^
-IB'. -2.^
-Ift!^^
(Chart Division - b) (CD - 4*9/2. )
m ( 6.0/15+ )
Average
Chart
Division
/3rt
/4.Z
/-*£
. -' " ^
/V.s-
/y.2
S^.2.
74. -5
74.5
73.5"
73
74
74. ^
72.<
.O
7/8.1
kW./
UK-\,\
(*&£>, 1
to^l^. I
* rr_- k.i^^ i — _i: . . . .. . ._ . . — .
Comments
n"u«vy. 1.
Aa.nae. £-t5DOfi AA/TI
V /^-oaa^A ,
AV6= 732 ^~, #»*»<
1 1 ^ (•*•* ffirri ir / —
*/1ioo
mne.
1MJI
For NOX Indicate whether NO, NO + NO2, or NO2 for specific interval.
Indicate whether time interval is from beginning of first time to beginning
of second time or to end of second time (circle one, or describe alternate).
Calculated Bv;
Checked Bv:
>* J>
Date:.
Date:.
-------
INITIAL CEM CAUBRATION AND PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
Plant:
Location:
Date:
Operator: £
Project #:
Parameter: SO2, CO2, O2, NOXCJHC^
Monitor: <^
Chart Divisions
Direct
Injection
to Monitor
o.o
/0.0
S'h.l
4t,.J
Injection
Through
System
o.O
/8.O
S£,"h
93° o
Concentration
Predicted by
Equation,*
Direct System
-1.1 -in
as.i as, i
i" >^ ™n T t^4*a » ^ ftQ
A* / A. * | ^^S^^T! j .- L^
4U1.8 45U.5
I
Calibration
Error,"*
1,7.1
O.ftl
Sampling
System
Bias,***
% of Span
0.0
<3.z.)
Correlation Coefficient =
Calculation concentration predicted by equatio using actual chart response
obtained from each calibration gas response.
Analyzer cal. error, % cal. gas vaJue = (Cal. gas cone., ppm - cone, predicted, ppm) x 100
Cal. gas value, ppm
Acceptable limit = < 2% of calibration gas value ( < 5% for THC)
(Direct inject, gas cone. - System inject, gas cone.) x 100
Span value
*** Sampling system bias =
Acceptable limit < 5% of span
Minimum detectable limit = 2% of span or SO
:r % (circle one)
Rise time to 95% of response for high cal. gas injected through the system
(return to zero after each injection): s, s, s Average • 23 s
Precision, % scale = difference in chart division response for two repeated
injections of the gas concentrations « - • %
(Clock time «= )
-------
J OC3
DAILY CEM CALIBRATION AND PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
Plant:
Location: Roorw
Date:
Parameter: SO2, C02,O2,
Monitor: (pp1r£br%
Span Value: 100
£*i
Operator:
Project #:
Time. Pretest: n;4o Post-test: 15:30 Ambient Temp., F:
Run#:
Chart Scale: o-soo p^ /?•
Pbar, in. Hg.: 2e>.qo
Cyl.
#
Cal. Gaa
Cone.,
O
A4.0*
2.-70.S
-K,?».^
Calibrations (Chart Oh/bions)
J2.'.<
4tin
Analyzer
Calibration
Error,"*
% of Soan
l.R^
Or*,***
% of Span
/.^
? , ^ 2_
* Perform linear regression of pretest cal. gas concentration vs. chart divisions to
determine the following equation:
y « mx + b x = ppm y = chart divisions
For Data Reduction:
Pollutant, ppm/% = (Chart Division - b) = (CD - o.<
m
)
Correlation Coefficient =
Analyzer cal. error, % cal. gas value
(Cal. gas cone. - cone, predicted) x 100
Cal. gas value, ppm
Acceptable limit = < 2% of calibration gas value (< 5% for THC)
***
Drift, % Span
(Post-test cal. response - initial cal. response) x 100
Span value
Acceptable limit < 3% of span
Minimum detectable limit = 2% of span or ppm or % (circle one)
Maximum zero drift = % of span or ppm or % (circle one)
Maximum calibration drift - % of span or ppm or % (cirde one)
COMMENTS: Pretest or post-test (drde one) calibration used to quantttate
sample data. Post-test Is used if drift exceeds limits and if post-test
yields higher concentration
na.
-------
DAILY CEM CALIBRATION AND PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
Parameter: SO2, COg, Q2, NOX
1 npatinrv T~J .—
l_Ul«aUUI 1. |-SQg>tv\. t XH
Time, Pretest: 15:45 Post-test: /g:4
Run#: RE-^-T. Re-^-^
Monitor: ^^pprf^br %
Span Value: 1 00
Chart Scale: ^-•*5zio /a/3m
Pbar. in. Hq.: ^^-/i? <® (\
<^ Ambient Temp., F: ss '
rrftpa-ft^
& ;eo'
op
Cyl.
#
c
CaLGas
Cone.,
5pnjjor%
0
84.0ft
270. S
4b?>.2>
CaUbrations (Chart Oh/linns)
l5.'4S nns /«/<^"
Ad /.4 j±&
/1.0
S(=,."2> tt.3 -T& /
44.0
Concsntretion Predicted
By Equation'
IS'.4S n:is I8-.4S
-/ 5T -/. <9 -/. £
A4-A
272. 5" 2.4»7.4 iT/'S"
4t»1.0
Analyzer
Calibration
Error.--
% of Span
0.3&
0,~?4
Drtt,*-
% of Span
0,1
/.o
* Perform linear regression of pretest cat. gas concentration vs. chart divisions to
determine the following equation:
y • mx + b x = ppm y = chart divisions
For Data Reduction:
Pollutant ppm/%
(Chart Division - b)
(CD-2,/03)
m
Correlation Coefficient =
**
Analyzer cal. error, % cal. gas value
(Cat. gas cone. - cone, predicted) x 100
Cal. gas value, ppm
Acceptable limit = < 2% of calibration gas value (< 5% for THC)
***
Drift, % Span =
(Post-test cal. response • initial cal. response) x 100
Span value
Acceptable limit < 3% of span
Minimum detectable limit« 2% of span or ppm or % (cirde one)
Maximum zero drift » % of span or ppm or % (cirde one)
Maximum calibration drift - % of span or ppm or % (drde one)
COMMENTS: Pretest or post-test (drde one) calibration used to quantttate
sample data. Post-test Is used if drift exceeds limits and if post-test
yields higher concentrations.
-------
GEM DATA REDUCTION - BAG ANALYSIS OR STEADY READINGS
Plant: Lfi-^f f) Parameter: SO?, CO2, O2) NOy*,<=, or»-k
Pollutant, ppm/% =
Run
P£--b-l
RJE-S-Z
KE--2»--3»
Time**
(24-Hr)
l4:2.^-.4.-^
~ 1 -/jj * xl^^p
•"• /^/i, ' *^ ^
_)fi;.0^
_^.1C|
-1^-.^
lU'-oo - iu: 10
-IU-.7.0
-IU-.-VH
-.U-.4.0
-iu:«^n
-IT.rtO
n:%^-i-i:-4.c
-n •. ^c;
-IR'lCj
-IA-.-IC
-•ft-aft
(Chart Division - b) (CD -<9.457 )
m (0. -20^77)
Average
Chart
Division
2^5-
23
2/.5
33
-^ v/
, 24.6
31
3*^
2Z-S
27
27
2A
27
2.7
-z.7
Concentration
/7/J/77
J>f^3> HO
^A3 UQ
>^ in
/?<9.2_
/"32. 7
A32.7
/2S 7-
x
/2tf /
/2S- 2-
/3O.2.
/2< 2.
/3^2.
Comments
^/W6,£ tf ^50 ^^
//-0/Jo.yie
AY& - I l"i ooi^v ProOA*\€
— lia u-^ c^rii i igpruvi
A~ **.,o
M /2/} 2 A
fiila — /.^t/i ppm ITOf
fl
C-D-i.
0,/*?8
•f
//
* For NOX Indicate whether NO, NO + NO2, or NO2 for specific interval.
**
Indicate whether time interval is from beginning of first time to beginning
of second time or to end of second time (circle one, or describe alternate).
Calculated Bv:
Checked By:
.
Dale:
Date:
-------
INITIAL CEM CAUBRAT10N AND PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
Plant:
Location:
Date:
Operator:
Project #:
Parameter: SO2, CO2, O2, NOX(
Monitor: ,0t5m!or%
P.
Span Value: 100
Chart Scale:
Pbar, in. Hg.: 2a.go (
Cylinder
#
Cal. Gas
J***"*
(£pmj>r%
O
&4.O&
2~7O.S
4u^.^
Chart Divisions
Direct
Injection
to Monitor
O.O
/7. S
5"S. ft
«?5".D
Injection
Through
System
O.O
/7.~7
^"t*.O
4S.7
I
Concentration
Predicted by
Equation,"
Direct System
-o.e> -o.B
&4 (o ds. fa
2.T 1 . 4 n 7. . 4
4U.2.1 4uu.l
Calibration
Error.'"
%oK6e«n
<%A<>
O. (o2-
0. 3»^>
Sampling
System
Bias,""*
% of Span
O.O
O.Z.
O."2.
0.1
* Perform linear regression of pretest cal. gas concentration vs. chart divisions to
determine the following equation:
y = mx + b x = ppm y = chart divisions
For Data Reduction:
Pollutant, ppm/% = (Chart Division - b) =
m
Correlation Coefficient =
Calculation concentration predicted by equatio using actual chart response
obtained from each calibration gas response.
**
Analyzer cai. error, % cal. gas value
(Cal. gas cone., ppm • cone, predicted, ppm) x 100
Cal. gas value, ppm
Acceptable limit = < 2% of calibration gas value (< 5% for THC)
*** Sampling system bias = (Dlrect Nect. gas cone. - System inject, gas cone.) x 100
Span value
Acceptable limit < 5% of span
Minimum detectable limit = 2% of span or
ppm or % (circle one)
Rise time to 95% of response for high cal. gas injected through the system
(return to zero after each injection): _ s, _ s, _ s Average = 23 s
.Precision, % scale = difference in chart division response for two repeated
injections of the gas concentrations = _ • _ • _ %
(Clock time = )
-------
3 aa a
DAILY CEM CALIBRATION AND PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
Plant:
Location:
Date:
Parameter: SO2, C02, 02,
Monitor:
Operator:
Project #:
Time, Pretest:
P.
Span Value: 100
Chart Scale:
- SOD
rr
Post-test:
Pbar, in. Hg.: 2
Ambient Temp., F:
Cyl.
#
<
Cal. Gaa
Cone.,
'|Spni)or%
O
54.0ft
no.s
4ts,^
Calibrations (Chart Divisions}
/2.-SS l^^s n:io //?.-«
o.o Z.g 7..T. Z.7.
/7.7
.^A.O (,0.7. 5-7.^ ^Tf./
^.7
Concentration Predicted
By Equation"
/2.'S£ 15 •.-»,«, iT.i-o /£•'££
-O.2> 17. ft 4f\ .l
Drift.—
% of Span
2..&
4.2_
* Perform linear regression of pretest cal. gas concentration vs. chart divisions to
determine the following equation:
y • mx + b x = ppm y = chart divisions
For Data Reduction:
Pollutant, ppm/% = (Chart Division - b) =
m
Correlation Coefficient =
Analyzer cal. error, % cal. gas value
(Cal. gas cone. -cone, predicted) x 100
Cal. gas value, ppm
Acceptable limit = < 2% of calibration gas value ( < 5% for THC)
***
Drift, % Span
(Post-test cal. response - initial cal. response) x 100
Span valua
Acceptable limit < 3% of span
Minimum detectable limit = 2% of span or ppm or % (circle one)
Maximum zero drift - % of span or ppm or % (circle one)
Maximum calibration drift = % of span or ppm or % (drde one)
COMMENTS: Pretest or post-test (circle one) calibration used to quantitate
sample data. Post-test Is used if drift exceeds limits and if post-test
yields higher concentration
na.
-------
ac3
•r— CEM DATA REDUCTION - BAG ANALYSIS OR STEADY READINGS
Plant: LASC.O
Location: _,
Date: S-is-^H
Parameter: SO2.CO2,O2. NOX*,(
Operator: A
Project #:
Pollutant, ppm/%
(Chart Division - b)
m
( 0.2.04,2,1 )
Run
Time**
(24-Hr)
Average
Chart
Division
Concentration
Comments
P-3-
O
'2
- H = 2.
_2_JB_
J^L
-Ifa'.4o
2 "7
- O
/*-*--»
-2-. 5
* For NOX Indicate whether NO, NO + NO2, or NO2 for specific interval.
**
Indicate whether time interval is from beginning of first time to beginning
of second time or to end of second time (circle one, or describe alternate).
Calculated By:.
Checked By:_
Date:.
Date:
-------
APPENDIX A.2.6
Condition 4 Method 25A
-------
LASCO Panel Products
Condition 4 - Main Exhaust
Total Hydrocarbons (THC)
15-May-97
Calibration Gases
0.0 ppm
270.5 ppm
463.3 ppm
866.7 ppm
System Calibration
-0.4
270.7
461.6
889.3
Calibration Error
0.55%
1.80%
Correlation 0.9998496
Slope 1.0265221
Intercept -5.4371408
20:05-21:05 Run 4-1
21:11
695.5
Post Cal
21:30-22:30 Run 4-2 | 700.4
22:35 Post Cal
Corrected 682.8 ppm THC |
3.5
465.5
Drift 0.39%
0.39%
Corrected 687.6 ppm THC
3.5
476.9
Drift 0.39%
1.53%
Paeel
-------
ieea.0-
W0.0-
E68.8
P
p 700.0
£00.0
P
R
0 400.0
P
N
E £00.0
180.0
0.0
1
ppn
1660.0'
c«0.0-
£88.8
P
p 700.0
£00.0
P
R
0 400.0
p
A 300.0
N
E £00.0
100.0
0.0
ppn
iwe.e
s«0.0
E88.8
P
p 700.0
n fae e
p „. ...
R ^e-e
0 400.0
P
N
E £08.8
100.8
0.8
LflSCO Panel Products l
889.3
Calibration Cases
886.7 ppn
463.3 ppn
270.5 ppn
0.0 ppn
461.6
270.7 \
1 .
-0.4
9-38 19-40 19-42 19-44 19-46 19-48 19-50
15 May '97, 19: 37: 44 MAIM EXHAUST
1
LflSCO Panel Products
Run lt-4-1 20-85 - 21-05
< . .• •
'""•••••• Ar^ _^~^.
Mean 695.5 ppn Propane
20'16 28-26 28-38 28-40 20:58 21 '88
15 Ma«'97.c0:03'88 MAIM EXHAUST
L
LfiSCO Panel Products
Systen Calibration Drift Check
Calibration Cases
0.0 ppn
463.3 ppn
465.5
102 ppn Styren* Gas Cylinder
f 244.0
3.5 33
3.3 J
21'12 21-14
15 Haw'97.21'11'35
21'16
21-18 21-28 21-22 21-24
MAIN EXHAUST
21-26 21-28
(HH'MM)
-------
p
p
N
P
R
0
P
A
N
E
P
P
M
P
R
0
P
A
N
E
980.0
£80.8
700.0
£00.0
eae.e
400.0
380.0
E00.0
100.0
0.0
2
ppn
iee0.0
980.0
£80.0
788. B
£00.0
rae.e
400.0
380.0
c«0.0
100.0
0.0
ppn
LflSCO Panel Products
Run ME-4-3 31 '30 - 33 '30
Mean 700.4 ppn Propane
i5liay'97.Ei'39'00 MAIN EXHAUST
I
LftSCO Panel Products
Systen Calibration Drift Check
Calibration Cases
463.3 ppn
0.0 ppn
476.9
3.5
22 '36 £2 '38 22<4B £2 '42 22 '44 £2 '46 £2 '48
13 May'97.£2'33<31 MAIM EXHAUST (HH-MM)
-------
LASCO Panel Products
Condition 4 - Room Exhaust
Total Hydrocarbons (THC)
15-May-97
Calibration Gases
0.0 ppm
84.1 ppm
270.5 ppm
463.3 ppm
System Calibration
8.5
94.2
280.3
470.5
Calibration Error
0.95%
0.42%
Correlation 0.999985
Slope 0.9965088
Intercept 9.6188518
20:05-21:05 Run 4-1
21:09
118.4
Post Cal
21:30-22:30 Run 4-2 | 127.6
18:57 Post Cal
Corrected 109.2 ppm THC |
2.2
276.1
Drift 1.15%
0.76%
Corrected 118.4 ppm THC |
8.5
276.1
Drift 0.00%
0.76%
Pagel
-------
p
p
n
p
R
0
p
ft
N
E
p
p
n
p
R
0
p
ft
N
p
p
N
P
R
P
ft
N
E
M8.0
458.8
488.0
350. 0
380.0
£50.0
£80.0
150.0
100.0
50.0
0.8
ppn
ree.e
450.8'
400.0
330. 0
380.0
'50 0
'
£80.0
158.8
108.0
50.0
0.0
LASCO Panel Products >
Systen Calibration Drift Check
4701 5 Calibration Gases
463.3 ppn
270.5 ppn
84.68 ppn
8.B8 ppn
280.3 \
'
L
94.2 \
19-39 19-40 19-41 19-42 19-43 19-44 19-45 19-46 19-47 19-48
15nav-97.19-38.il ROOM EXHAUST (HH-MM)
LASCO Panel Products l
Run RE-4-1 28-85 - 21-85
He an 118.4 ppn Propane
___._._ ~^r-*V. _^_
^s^~*~-~s-< ^/---v^^.^rv-v^^^^^v v^ — s A^
28-18 28-28 28-38 28-40 28-58 21-08
ppn 13 Mas. '97. £8- 03- 08 ROOM EXHAUST (HH.MM)
550.01
ree.e-
450.0
400.0
3SO.O
380.0
£50.0
£80.0
150.0
iaa o
LASCO Panel Products
Svsten Calibration Drift Check
Calibration Gases
0.0 ppn
270.5 ppn
276. 1
1 102 ppn Stvrene Gas Cylinder
S*~~ 223.8
/
-------
p
p
ri
p
R
0
p
A
N
E
M0.8
450.0
400.0
350.8
380.8
258.0
£30.0
150.8
100.0
50.0
8.8
I
LASCO Panel Products
Run RE-4-2 21=38 - 22 = 30
Mean 127.6 ppr» Propane
,vx_~~^K^.v~_jX-*JV/~»'~,V\v ^~^^***s~^~~*S~>-^~~^^~^^^--*"
ppn
21=30 21=40
15 May'97,21=28-80
21=50 22=00
ROOM EXHAUST
22'10
22'20
(HH-MM)
P
P
n
p
R
o
p
A
N
E
500.0-
450.0
400.0
358.8
£50.0
£60.0
150.0
100.8
50.0
0.8
I
LftSCO Panel Prcducts
Systen Calibration Drift Check .-..
Calibration Gases
0.0 ppm
270.5 ppm
8.5
276.1
( \
I
ppn
22=36 22=37
13 llay'97.22 = 35 = 58
22 = 38
22 = 39 22 = 40
ROOM EXHAUST
22 = 41
£2'42
-------
3 BC3
-
-l _
DAILY CEM CALIBRATION AND PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
Plant:
Location:
Date:
Parameter: SO2, CO2, O2, NOxf
Monitor: .?s
8fck.~7
Calibrations (Chart Divisions)
H'.^S 41:10 22:^^
o.o O.-f 0.9
1.1.0
4U.7. 4t9.7- A1.4-
dZ
I.-2. 5,1 10, 1
210.1
4bl.4 4loi.4 4-7^,.-^
a0r?.&
Analyzer
Calibration
Error,**
% of Span
0.15
£.4 \
Drift,***
% of Span
0.4
/.I.
* Perform linear regression of pretest cal. gas concentration vs. chart divisions to
determine the following equation:
y s= mx + b x = ppm y = chart divisions
For Data Reduction:
Pollutant, ppm/% = (Chan Division - b) = _
Correlation Coefficient =
*•
Analyzer cal. error, % cal. gas value = _ (Cal. gas cone. -cone, predicted) x 100
Cal. gas value, ppm
Acceptable limit = < 2% of calibration gas value ( < 5% for THC)
***
Drift, % Span =
(Post-test cal. response - initial cal. response) x 100
Span value
Acceptable limit < 3% of span
Minimum detectable limit» 2% of span or ppm or % (circle one)
Maximum zero drift = % of span or ppm or % (clrde one)
Maximum calibration drift = % of span or ppm or % (cirde one)
COMMENTS: Pretest or post-test (drde one) calibration used to quantitate
sample data Post-test is used if drift exceeds limits and if post-test
yields higher concentrations. .
-------
— GEM DATA REDUCTION - BAG ANALYSIS OR STEADY READINGS
Plant:
Location:
Date:
Parameter: SO2, CO2, Q2, NOx*£tH
Operator:
Project #:
Pollutant, ppm/% = (Chart Division'
m
Run
Time**
(24-Hr)
Average
Chan
Division
Concentration
Comments
Turw V
ME-4-1
-21 •' OS
70
10_
-ZTL
'. 7.0
-70S. 6
- 2.1 : 30
- ftf) MA
* For NOX Indicate whether NO, NO + NO2, or NO2 for specific interval.
**
Indicate whether time interval is from beginning of first time to beginning
of second time or to end of second time (circle one, or describe alternate).
Calculated By:.
Checked By:_
Date:
Date:
-------
a oca
DAILY GEM CALIBRATION AND PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
Plant:
U)\SC-O
Location:
Date:
Parameter:
Monitor: (gpm)or%
, C02, 02,
Operator: ^
Project #:
Span Value: 100
Chart Scale: o~
rr
Time, Pretest: jf
Run #'• RsE-4-l .
Pbar, in. Hg.: 2^.2.0 C2.0:00")
Post-test: 22:36 Ambient Temp., F: rs"o °P
Cyl.
#
Cal. Gas
Cone.,
35in£or%
0
S4.0A
270.S
4fe.2>.^
Calibrations (Chart Divisions)
l^'.^S 2UIO 22:2>S
1,4 0.0 i.ft
11,0
Sto.b S^.A ^^,S
^4. a
Concentration Predicted
By Equation*
R'.^«^ ^.i:iO 22-'.3S
- .^ -8.^ 0,1
55.5
112 ,?> -Jb'?.'1* 2fcb,8
-4bi.O
Analyzer
Calibration
Error,"
% of Span
/.&
#.t=n
Drill,"**
% of Span
;.&
/./
* Perform linear regression of pretest cal. gas concentration vs. chart divisions to
determine the following equation:
y •• mx + b x = ppm y = chart divisions
For Data Reduction:
Pollutant, ppm/% = «Ch«K Divlsion'b' =
-------
3 no c=a
_= GEM DATA REDUCTION - BAG ANALYSIS OR STEADY READINGS
Plant:
Parameter: SO2, C02, Q2, NOx*C[HC,)3O
Date:
Project*: .S4o5.no:*>
- (ChartDivision - b) = (CD-/
m
Run
#
PvE-4-l
f i-~'. /•',' •
RE- 4-^
Time**
(24-Hr)
2x>:o*5 -7{v.te;
~ 2.O '. -> «^
-?n:^-=,
~2JD!4-«>
~ 20: ?s<;
-it-.r,^
21:5,0 -•?/ -^.n
-i/:^/-.
- zo. -. on
- 2.1.'. /O
"2. 2. '.-7^
-T.-Z.'.-^<3
Average
Chart
Division
23.5
24
23. S
U
24
24
24.5
16
21,
2Z
2k
2L.<
•
Concentration
/O/tsr?
/07.1
/I0,?>
/07.1
//0<3
//0,3
//# 3
//^ &
//£ 3
/JO. 3>
//S~ "*>
/2o 2>
/22.9>
-
Comments
^T~£//r7 ^~
AN/6,- /0f,6 \A»1$0&I*H
-A-3 ULL ffM'iep^
AM6=- //7 A **» At***
ffftf7^ ryyr
i
* For NOX Indicate whether NO, NO + NO2 , or NO2 (or specific interval.
**
Indicate whether time interval is from beginning of first time to beginning
ot second time or to end of second time (cirde one, or describe alternate).
Calculated By:
Checked By:
'•*
Date:
-------
aaca
DAILY GEM CALIBRATION AND PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
Plant:
Location:
Date: ^
Operator:
Project #:
P. g
Parameter: S02, COg. O2,
Span Value: 100
Chart Scale:
Pbar, in. Hg.:
Propose.
Time, Pretest: i«y.g( Post-test: 22; 45" Ambient Temp., F: .3
Calibrations (Chart Divisions)
R'SI 2/-'LO 2V1Z
2.1 z.l 2./
IS.O
5S.7. <5.-S 5-^.7.
flz.q
Concentration Predicted
By Equation*
1o$ 2t>£,-*>
4fb.l
Analyzer
Calibration
Error,"
% of Span
1.57
o.o4-
Drtt,*"
% of Span
O
A/
* Perform linear regression of pretest cal. gas concentration vs. chart divisions to
determine the following equation:
y B mx + b x = ppm y = chart divisions
For Data Reduction:
Pollutant, ppm/% = (Chart Division - b) = (CD -2
m
Correlation Coefficient =
Analyzer cal. error, % cal. gas value =
(Cal. gas cone. - cone, predicted) x 100
Cal. gas value, ppm
Acceptable limit = < 2% of calibration gas value (< 5% for THC)
***
Drift, % Span =,
(Post-test cal. response - initial cai. response) x 100
Span value
Acceptable limit < 3% of span
Minimum detectable limit - 2% of span or ppm or % (circle one)
Maximum zero drift = % of span or ppm or % (circle one)
Maximum calibration drift = % of span or ppm or % (circle one)
COMMENTS: Pretest or post-test (cirde one) calibration used to quantrtate
sample data. Post-test is used if drift exceeds limits and if post-test
yields higher concentrate
nuns.
-------
a a
— GEM DATA REDUCTION - BAG ANALYSIS OR STEADY READINGS
Plant:
Location:
Date: -
Parameter: SO2,CO2,Q2, NOx*,:is
-•2.o:-2.s
-2^'-3S"
-io:4S
-•ZO'.SS
+•2. 1 1 o 5
2l'-30-^r.4o
-r| : <;£>
-27.: oo
-2.T-1. \O
- 1."2. '. 7.O
-22; ->,r»
Average
Chart
Division
2.2.
2.2-
z./ ••>
Z, /
x.o
2.0
WAv
^,f
2.5"
2.4
2.S
2.^
•
Concentration
W"
-o.S
-o.S
Comments
3"UAV^
^UVLOUr^ )t<»^i«!*i~
^«.\r Wj PflLw
* For NOX Indicate whether NO, NO + NO2, or NO2 for specific interval.
**
Indicate whether time interval is from beginning of first time to beginning
of second time or to end of second time (cirde one, or describe alternate).
Calculated By:
Checked By: s Date:
-------
APPENDIX A.2.7
Condition 5 Method 25A
-------
LASCO Panel Products
Condition 5 - Main Exhaust
Total Hydrocarbons (THC)
19-May-97
Calibration Gases
0.0 ppm
270.5 ppm
463.3 ppm
'886.7 ppm
System Calibration
-0.4
270.7
461.6
881.6
Direct Calibration
-0.4
278.4
473.1
904.5
9:04-10:26 Run 5-1
Correlation 0.9999966
Slope 0.9942047
Intercept 0.5978049
Sampling System Bias
0.00%
0.77%
1.15%
2.29%
Correlation 0.9999945
Slope 1.0197358
Intercept 0.7795344
Calibration Error
0.65%
0.03%
473.8 Corrected 476.0 ppm THC
Calibration Gases
0.0 ppm
270.5 ppm
463.3 ppm
886.7 ppm
System Calibration
-0.4
278.4
465.5
908.4
Calibration Error
1.15%
1.48%
Correlation 0.9999227
Slope 1.0231749
Intercept -1.53875
435.3
11:08-12:30 Run 5-2 |
12:37 PostCal
Corrected 426.9 ppm THC |
-0.4
469.3
Drift 0.00%
0.38%
13:53-15:15 Run 5-3 I 421.5
Corrected 413.5 ppm THC ]
Calibration Gases
0.0 ppm
270.5 ppm
463.3 ppm
866.7 ppm
System Calibration
3.5
274.5
465.5
900.7
Calibration Error
0.84%
2.28%
Correlation 0.9997496
Slope 1.0353339
Intercept -3.212978
Pagel
-------
p
p
n
P
R
0
P
A
N
E
90e.e-
£80.8
788.8
£89.0
M8.0
480.0
280.0
£80.0
100.0
0.0
ppn
LASCO P.
-0.4
anel Products
Direct vs. Systen Calibrati
904.5
473.1
Calibration Gases
ES6.7 ppn Propane
463.3 ppn Propane
270. 5 ppn Propane
0.0 ppn Propane
278.4
-0.4 -0.4
\ im
ons
881.6
I
457.8 /
266.9
3.5
7'40 7-42 7<44 7-46 7'48 7-50 7-52 7'54 7'56 7<58
19 Mag '97. 07 '39 >24 MAIM EXHAUST CHH-MM)
P
p
n
P
R
0
P
A
N
E
see. 0s
680.8
780.0
£08.0
M0.0
488.0
:80.0
£.80.0
100.0
0.0
ppn
LfiSCO Panel Products
Stgrene Calibration
Calibration Gas
102 ppn Styrene
r 2
P
P
n
P
R
0
P
A
1680.0
988.0
£88.0
788.8
£88.8
?88.8
488.8
;88.8
£88.8
188.8
8.8
PP"
LASCO Panel Products
Run ME-5-1 9'84 - ie'H6
Mean 473.8 ppn Propane
9'10 9<£8
19 May'97.09-82'80
9-38
9'48 9-58
MAIM EXHAUST
ie>00
18-10
18-ee
-------
p 708.8
eae. e
R M0'e
0 408.0
P
A '«a a
N
108.8
8.8
ppn
ie«0.0'
we.0
€80. e
p 780.8
" €80.8
P -M 0
R -co<0
0 488.8
P
463.3 ppn Prcpane
278.5 ppn Prcpane
886.7 ppn Prcpane
465.5
278.4
-0.4 \_
18-48 18-42 10-44 10-46 10-48 10-50 10-52 18-54 10-56
9 May '97. 18 -38 '33 MAIN EXHAUST (HH-hll)
!
I
LftSCO Panel Products
Run rE-5-2 11-08 - 12'38
I i
i!\4/A^^M^
A -00.04 ' ywppii ' '' ' ~ r \j i
H
E c«8.0
100.0
0.8
ppn
s«o.o
EC0.0
p 788.8
n
R Ma'e
0 488.8
P
A 380.8
N
E £«8.e
lee.e
e.e
ppn
.Mean 435.3 ppn Propane
11-10 1P20 11-30 11-40 11-50 12-00 12-10 12-20
19 Mav'97. 11 -06-88 MAIN EXHAUST (HH-nil)
I
LASCO Panel Products
Svtsten Calibration Drift Check
Calibration Cases
8.0 ppn Propane
463.3 ppn Propane
469.3
-8.4 -0.4
12-48 12-45 12-50 12-55 13-08
19 rlaw'97. 12-37-22 MAIN EXHAUST
-------
p
p
n
P
R
0
P
A
N
E
1889.9
989.94
£89.0
789.8
£89.9
499.9
J80.0
£08.9
188.8
8.8
ppn
LASCO Panel Products
Run ME-5-3 13'53 - 15'15
1
Mean 421.5 ppn Propane
14<88 14=10
19 May'97,13 51'88
14'20
14-36 14>48
MAIM EXHAUST
14-58
15'68
15'19
(HH'MM)
ieee.0
<«0.0
£09.0
P
p 798.8
n
€89.9
P
R
0 499.9
P
A J89.9
N
E £09.9
199.9
0.9
LASCO Panel Products
I
Ssjstcn Calibration Opi'iM Check
Calibration Gases
8.0 ppn Prcpane
463.3 ppn Prcpane
279.5 ppn Prcpane
866.7 ppn Prcpane
465.5
3.5
274.5
900.7
^_ 3.5
15-28 15-39 15-32
ppn 19 Hay '97. IS '27 '10
15-34 15-36 15-38 15-40 15-42 15 -4<
HA IN EXHAUST CHH-nn)
-------
LASCO Panel Products
Condition 5 - Room Exhaust
Total Hydrocarbons (THC)
19-May-97
Calibration Gases
0.0 ppm
270.5 ppm
463.3 ppm
886.7 ppm
System Calibration
-0.4
270.7
461.6
881.6
Direct Calibration
-0.4
274.5
469.3
896.9
Correlation 0.9999966
Slope 0.9942047
Intercept 0.5978049
Sampling System Bias
0.00%
0.38%
0.77%
1.53%
Correlation 0.9999988
Slope 1.0116984
Intercept 0.2106758
Calibration Error
0.23%
0.08%
9:04-10:26 Run 5-1 | 113.4
Corrected 113.5 ppm THC
Calibration Gases
0.0 ppm
270.5 ppm
463.3 ppm
886.7 ppm
System Calibration
-0.4
255.5
434.9
832.0
Calibration Error
0.51%
0.04%
Correlation 0.9999966
Slope 0.93818
Intercept 0.4198472
11:08-12:30 Run 6-2 | 123.2
15:16 PostCal
Corrected 130.9 ppm THC
-0.4
431.1
Drift 0.00%
0.38%
Calibration Gases
0.0 ppm
270.5 ppm
463.3 ppm
886.7 ppm
System Calibration'
-0.4
247.8
419.6
809.1
Calibration Error
0.64%
0.59%
Correlation 0.9999866
Slope 0.9121195
Intercept -0.497395
13:53-15:15 Run 6-3 |
Corrected 123.1 ppm THC
Calibration Gases
0.0 ppm
270.5 ppm
463.3 ppm
886.7 ppm
System Calibration
-0.4
255.5
434.9
835.8
Calibration Error
0.37%
0.32%
Correlation 0.999996
Slope 0.9425626
Intercept -0.4056875
Pigel
-------
P
p
n
p
R
o
p
A
N
E
1680. 0
930.0
£88.8
780.0
££0.0
400.0
;88.8
£88.8
180.0
0.0-
ppn
-0.4
| LflSCQ 1
896.9
>anel Products
Direct us System Calibrations
Calibration Gases
0.0
886.7
463.3
270.5
469.3
274.5
7 • 58 8 ' 00 8 ' 82
19 May '97,07.56> 29
ppn Propane
ppn Propane
ppn Propane
ppn Propane
-0.4
^ 881.6
1
\_
461.6 I
\
270.7
•
8'84 8>86 8'08 8>18 8U2
ROOM EXHAUST
P
p
n
p
R
0
p
A
N
E
P
P
N
P
R
0
P
-W
E
688.8
708.0
£88.8
~ea.0
400.0
:a0.e
£80.0
100.0
0.0
ppn
iee0.0
980.8-
£88.8
788.8
£08.8
m
'
488.8
aee.e
c88.8
188.8
8.8
HAM
I
L«CO Panel Products
Styrene Calibration
Calibration Gas
182 Pen Styrrne
r •» \
/ \
/
8'14 8 15 8:16 8:17 8'
19 May '97.ee =13 12 ROOM EXHAUST (HH-MM)
LftSCO Panel Products
Run RE-5-1 9.84-18-86
Mean 113.4 ppn Propane
^*^~***^^**~~^^^^
-r^ ^A^*-/ •*^S«^~-
18
19 H»j'97.e9.e2>88 ROOM EXHAUST
-------
p
p 700.0
n
£00.0
L M0.0
R
0 408.8
P
A ;8e.e
E a«8.e
188.8
0n
• o
0.0 ppn Propane
463.3 ppn Propane
270.5 ppn Propane
886.7 ppn Propane 434.9
255.5
-8.4
10-35 10>40 18>45 18>58
ppn 19 nay '97. 10- 32 -10 ROOM EXHAUST
leee.ei
se0.e
£80.0
p
p 700. e
n
£00.8
P ,flee
R
0 488.0
P
A 380.0
N
E £00.8
108.0
0.0
ppn
ieee.8
s«0.0-
£80.0
P
P 780.0
M
£00.0
o 380-8
R
0 480.0
P
A *«*a n
M
E £00.0
100.0
0.0
LASCO Panel Products
Run RE-5-2 11-08 - 12-30
Mean 123.2 ppn Propane
18-55
(HH'MM)
1.
^.-W ^m-lf^
11-18 11-20 11-30 11-40 11-50 12-00 12-10 12-20
19 nay -97. n -06- 00 ROOM EXHAUST
LASCO Panel Products
Systen Calibration Drift Check
Calibration Cases
0.0 ppn Propane
463.3 ppn Propane
-8.4
431.1
V
12-40 12-42 12-44 12 J**.., »2j.*8 I2'58
.0 •...»>•> «o.-x>,-j4 • . , ROOM FVHAUST
-------
p
p
M
P
R
0
P
A
N
E
1000.0
£88.0
700.0
£00.0
M0.0
380.0
100.0
8.0
13
ppm
i
LASCO Panel Products
Systen Calibration
Calibration Gases
0.0 ppn Propane
463.3 ppn Propane
886.7 ppn Propane
270.5 ppn Propane
-0.4
419.6
r~ 809. 1
247.8
I
34 13.36 13.38 13.40 13.42 13.44 13
19 May '97. 13. 34' 80 ROOM EXHAUST
•46
P
P
n
p
R
0
p
A
N
E
S00.0
£88.0
roo.o
£00.0
.00.0
400.0
:a0.0
£00.0
100.0
0.0
11
LASCO Panel Products
Rt-n RE-5-3 13.53 - 15.15
Mean 111.8 ppn Propane
14>80 14:10 14.20 14.30 14-40 14.50 15.00 15.10
ppm 19 May '97. 13. 51' 00 ROOM EXHAUST (HH-MM)
p
p
N
P
R
0
P
A
N
E
s«0.0-
£80.0
700.0
€00.0
M0.0
406.0
:e0.0
£00.0
100.0
0.0
LASCO Panel Products
Systen Calibration Drift Check
Calibration Cases
0.8 ppn Propane
463.3 ppn Propane
270. 5 ppn Propane
866.7 ppn Propane
-0.4
434.9
r i
\ 233.5
833.8
- --...'..
i.
. —
13-26 13'28
ppm 19 May'97,13'23'33
13' 30
15'32 15'34
ROOM EXHAUST
13'36
13'38
-------
LASCO Panel Products
Condition 5 - Auxiliary Fan
Total Hydrocarbons (THC)
19-May-97
Calibration Gases
0.0 ppm
270.5 ppm
463.3 ppm
886.7 ppm
System Calibration
-0.4
270.7
461.6
885.5
Direct Calibration
-0.4
274.5
465.5
896.9
Correlation 0.9999983
Slope 0.9987028
Intercept -0.2494544
Sampling System Bias
0.00%
0.38%
0.39%
1.14%
Correlation 0.9999895
Slope 1.011169
Intercept -0.524837
Calibration Error
0.55%
0.52%
9:04-10:26 Run 5-1
148.3
Corrected 148.7 ppm THC
Calibration Gases
0.0 ppm
270.5 ppm
463.3 ppm
886.7 ppm
System Calibration
3.5
247.8
423.5
809.1
Calibration Error
0.33%
0.08%
Correlation
Slope
Intercept
0.9999978
0.9088789
2.765449
11:08-12:30 Run 5-2 132T
Corrected 142.3 ppm THC
Calibration Gases
0.0 ppm
270.5 ppm
463.3 ppm
886.7 ppm
System Calibration
-0.4
263.1
454.0
877.8
Direct Calibration
-0.4
274.5
465.5
896.9
Correlation 0.9999764
Slope 0.9912136
Intercept -2.9403925
Sampling System Bias
0.00%
1.14%
1.15%
1.91%
Correlation 0.9999895
Slope 1.011169
Intercept -0.524837
Calibration Error
0.55%
0.52%
Pagel
-------
LASCO Panel Products
Condition 5 - Auxiliary Fan
Total Hydrocarbons (THC)
144.8
13:53-15:15 Run 5-3
- -
15:16 PostCal
Corrected 149.1 ppm THC |
-0.4
461.6
Drift 0.00%
0.76%
Calibration Gases
0.0 ppm
270.5 ppm
463.3 ppm
886.7 ppm
System Calibration
-4.2
244.0
423.5
824.4
Calibration Error
0.80%
0.65%
Correlation 0.999967
Slope 0.935221
Intercept -6.9564121
Page 2
-------
p
p
tl
p
R
0
P
A
M
E
see.e
£80.0
700.0
£00.0
MO.O
400. e
aao.e
£80.0
100.0
0.8
t
ppn
LASCO Panel Products
896.9
Direct us Systen Calibration
Calibration Cans
886.7 ppn Propane
463.3 ppn Propane
270.5 ppn Propane
0.0 ppn Propane
V
465.5
274.5
-0.4 -0.4
885.5
1
V
461.6 1
270.7
1,16 8.18 8-38 8' 22 8' 24 8'26 8'28 8'30
19 nay-97.ee- is- 33 AUXILIARY FAN
p
p
n
p
R
0
p
A
N
E
ieee.0'
seo.e
£80.0
?00.0
£80.0
?eo.o
400.0
280.0
£80.e
100.0
0.0
PP«
LflSCO Panel Products l
Run AF-5-1 9.04-10.26
Mean 148.3 ppn Propane
-'V'^N''*^— O^*'Vi-.*wv-''*'*M^-^«--— ^A^
9' 10 9
leeo.e
CAfl Ck ,
£88.0
P
p 700.0
" £80.0
P
R -a0-8
0 400.0
A £80.0
H
E eee.e
108.0
e.e
LASCO Panel Products
Svsten Calibration Drift Check
Calibration Gases
0.8 ppn Propane
463.3 ppn Propane
270.5 ppn Propane
886.7 ppn Propane
3.5
483.5
1
847.8
809.1
10-88 10-38 10-38 18-34 10-36 18-38 10-40
ppn 19 Hw'97. 18-87-34 AUXILIARY FAN
-------
ieea.8
788.0
688.8
P
p 700.0
M £ae e
p
R -ae'0
0 400.0
P
A 380.0
N
E £88.8
188.8
0.8
t
LASCO Panel Products
Run AF-5-2 11 '88 - 12-38
.,;
1
11 '08 - 11:23 I
1
Mean 132.1 ppn Propane 1
^JlJ^J^tJ^l A 1 v;
•^v/^vu^v^^^^^ 1 r-
III _l\ . _. ,li
^ 1 1 T I Tl^n- 7 . 1 tt II
11-10 11:20 11-38 11-40 11:58 12 '00 12:10 12 '20
ppn 19 nav'97,11-06'80 AUXILIARY FAN
1&00.0 "I
988.8
£80.0
P
p 708.8-
n
£88.0-
P ™0
R
0 408.0
P
A ;a0.0
N
E 288.0
100.0
0A
• W
LASCO Panel Products :'j'
870.7 •. .i? 8 ir. 8
Calibration Gases
£S6.7 ppn Propane
463.3 ppn Propane
270.5 ppn Propane
0.0 ppn Propane
4«-S 454.0 |
274-5 263.1
-0.4 A -0.4
13-30 13:32 13:34 13:36 13:38 13:40 13:42
ppn 19 May -97. 13' 29: 30 AUXILIARY FAN (HH-nn)
1C00.0
788.8
£80. 8
P
p 788.8
n
£88.8
„ !88.8
R
0 488.8
P
A :a0.0
N
E £88.8
188.8
8.8
1
LASCO Panel Products
Run AF-5-3 13-53 - 15' 15
Mean 144.8 ppn Propane
t^"W^U^^
..... .. .. ...
14i88 14'10
!9H«v'97.i3.si.e8
14-20 14-30 14-40 14-50 15 '00 15-10
AUXILIARY FAN
-------
P
p
(1
p
R
0
P
N
E
CAO ct <
£88.8'
708.6
680.0
568.6
406.6
286.6
168.0
0a
. V
L
LASCO Panel Products
Svsten Calibration Drift Check
Calibration Gases
8.0 ppn Propane
463.3 ppn Propane
461.6
-8.4
V
p
p
n
p
R
0
p
A
N
E
15-17 15-18 15-19 15-28 15-21 15-22 15-£3 15-24 15-25 19-26
ppm 19 May '97, 15 -16 '25 AUXILIARY FAN
$«e.e
£86.8
700.0
€80.0
386.6
468.6
286.0
£88.8
168. 8
0A
. V
I
LASCO Panel Products
Propane Calibration
824-4 1 886.7 ppn Propane
1 463.3 ppn Propane
j 270.5 ppn Propane
1 0.0 ppn Propane
/ 423-5 \
If \
L_
244.0 I
1 ~
15-43 15-44 15-45 15-46 15-47 15-48 15-49 15-58
P
P
N
p
R
0
P
A
N
E
ppm 19 May '97. 15-42< 30 AUXILIARY FAN (HH-HM)
ieeo.0
986.8
£88.0
700.0
£88.6
568. 6
468.6
288.8
£68.6
108.0
8.8
V
LASCO Panel Products
Styrene Calibrations
Calibration Gases
296.7 ppn Styrene
143.1 ppn Styrene f~~"^ 438.8
188 ppn Styrene /
r' ~"~ 289.8
1
J
19-98 15-52 19-94 19-96 19-98 16-66 16 88
ppn 19 May '97. 15-56-00 AUXILIARY FAN
-------
»0.0-
680.0-
P
p 706.0
fj
£80.0
P
R " * '
0 406.6
P
n
A '68 6 -
M
E £86.6-
199.9
9.6
ppn
1£80.0'
1100.0
1CC0.0
p S«0.0
[* £80.0
n
700.0
P
£80.0
f»
0 '80.0
P
A 400.0
M 380.0
E
£80.0
100.6
0 0
ppn
1868.0
€80.0
P
p 700. 0
n
P
0 "e9'°
R
0 400.0
p
1
ft -QQ. 0
E £88.8
186.8
0A
• V
LASCO Panel Products
Styrene Calibrations
Calibration Gases
256.7 ppn Styrene
549.5
1 02 Don ^ t LI ror\&
* we KK™ •* » y i ™i Mr i
• r
305.1 1
I
I
• — I
143.1 ppn Styrene
r-" \
377.6 }
-4.2
16-08 16' 10 16-12 16-14 16=16 16-18
19 May'97. 16-07-89 AUXILIARY FAM (HH-MM)
LASCO Panel Products
Calibration for Styrene Responses
Calibration Cases
0.0 ppn Propane
463.3 ppn Propane
270.5 ppn Propane
886.7 ppn Propane
563.6 \
\
327.3
-4.5
16-19 16-28 16'21 16'22
19 May'97, 16- 18-25 AUXILIARY FAN
LASCO Panel Products
Styrene Calibration
r
A /
/\J
IJ
1086.4
I
1
L-
16-23 16-24 16'25
(HH-MM)
1
Calibration Gas
102 ppn Styrene
253~5 \
\
V,
31-30 32'89
19 M*V'97,88'31>19
32-30
33'80 33-30
AUXILIARY FAN
34-89
34-39
-------
APPENDIX A.2.8
Condition 6 Method 25A
-------
INITIAL CEM CALIBRATION AND PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
Plant:
Location:
Date:
Parameter: SOa.CO^C^,
Monitor:
Operator: /?
Project #:
Span Value: 100
Chart Scale: c
Pbar, in. Hg.:
Pr
Cylinder
*
AAL1IO
AALiasi^
ALmoiSibi
Cal. Gas
Conc.,
xfjpntbr %
^""^
o
2~7O. ^
4Ai. 3,
88k, ~7
Chart Divisions
Direct
Injection
to Monitor
O.I
17,1
4l.l
30.1
Injection
Through
System
O.I
A&Zl.o
4.^.<=)
8&. 1
. \
Concentration
Predicted by
Equation,'
Direct System
o. S 0.5
11lP( 2.U^.4
451 f\ 44-ft . 1
£&& o Ai^n . to
Calibration
Error,""
%of-Span
(S./VS
r>.fif\
0.-75
Sampling
System
Bias,""-
% of Span
O.Q
o.<\
1-2.
Z.&
Perform linear regression of pretest cal. gas concentration vs. chart divisions to
determine the following equation:
y = mx + b x = ppm y = chart divisions
For Data Reduction:
Pollutant, ppm/% = (Chart Division - b)
(CD -
m
)
Correlation Coefficient = ^
Calculation concentration predicted by equatio using actual chart response
obtained from each calibration gas response.
**
Analyzer cal. error, % cal. gas value =
(CaL gas conc" ppm " conc- Predicted'
***
Cal. gas value, ppm
Acceptable limit = < 2% of calibration gas value (< 5% for THC)
Sampling system bias = (Direc* '"Ject. gas conc. - System inject, gas conc.) x 100
* ,., ,. Span value
Acceptable limit < 5% of span
Minimum detectable limit = 2% of span or ZO ppm or % (circle one)
Rise time to 95% of response for high cal. gas injected through the system
(return to zero after each injection): __s, s, s Average = 27 s
Precision, % scale « difference in chart division response for two repeated
injections of the gas concentrations = - = %
(Clock time B )
-------
j oca
DAILY GEM CALIBRATION AND PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
Plant:
Location: KM si
Parameter: S2,
Monitor:
, O2,
Operator: ft. <,lg-
Project #:
Time, Pretest: 7:^0 Post-test: 15; 60
Run#'• KE-S-I tne-S-i. ME-s-3
Span Value: 100
Chart Scale: o-iooo
Pbar, in. Hg.: ze>
Ambient Temp., F:
fP-
Cyl.
*
Cal. Gas
CJgnc.,
^pm)or%
,0
ZTO.S
4-U3, ..?,
g^fe.l
Calibrations (Chart Oh/lsions)
7.'50 lo:44 iz-.4ft i.-s:^
Ol/ 0-2. o.i 0.^5
27.O 27,5 777
45.3 4U.2. 47. (9 4^.7
dg. / «;/, 0
Concentration Predicted
By Equation*
01 / 2. D / 22.
21 |."S J~)4- -a, 777 A
4UI A 4L.4-3 472^ 41 3 &
%p,-).2_ ^Olo -^
Analyzer
Calibration
Error,"
% of Span
O .iO
O . 1Z
DrHt,—
% of Span
£> 2.
/ /
* Perform linear regression of pretest cat. gas concentration vs. chart divisions to
determine the following equation:
y = mx + b x = ppm y = chart divisions
For Data Reduction:
Pollutant, ppm/% = (Chart Division - b) = (CD-Q4?ek)
m (£.
Correlation Coefficient =
**
Analyzer cal. error, % oal. gas value
(Cal. gas cone. - cone, predicted) x 100
Cat. gas value, ppm
Acceptable limit = < 2% of calibration gas value (< 5% for THC)
***
Drift, % Span =
(Post-test cal. response - initial cal. response) x 100
Span value
Acceptable limit < 3% of span
Minimum detectable limit = 2% of span or M (j5prrj)or % (circle one)
Maximum zero drift = % of span or ppm or % (cirde one)
Maximum calibration drift - % of span or ppm or % (circle one)
COMMENTS: Pretest or post-test (drde one) calibration used to quantitate
sample data. Post-test is used if drift exceeds limits and if post-test
yields higher concentrations.
-------
jog cza
5 — GEM DATA REDUCTION - BAG ANALYSIS OR STEADY READINGS
Plant: /^^ Parameter: SO2, C02, O2, NOx*CmCDCO
Location: ^/A^ EXHAUST Operator: A 3;£&e:L-
Date: s-i^-T? Project #: S4o£.oo3
Po
Run
#
rAE-5-l
ME-S-2.
ihrtant rpnv% _ (Chart Division - b) _ (CD -aoat )
m (0.0112.0 )
Time**
(24-Hr)
q:D4- -q: I4
-«'. Z4-
-<9'3^
-7/V4
-^.'^
-//O/JV
-//>.w
-/^.'^^
n:oa - u: IP,
- II : if,
-\r.i,A
-\V-.4ft
-\|-.^
-i5- r^p.
-«5L'. I ft
-IT.:?^
-^:^
Average
Chart
Division
4&
IB
4&
45-
50
4B
4-1
4^
45
2>^
M
4f>
4*
44
47
4*
Concentration
W"
4&5.0
4&75.0
4&:5.o
4e=>2. a
c^C>~^ .2-
4623.O
4-7 Z.^
4*S7 &
4^2 8
^fcZ.O
j^z.-^
4o^.4
4^-2..^
442 "7
^72 f
-^^2. A1
E_3 Tf-.JtU fftn ItVJU
e
^<-l
* For NOX Indicate whether NO, NO + NO2, or NO2 for specific interval.
** Indicate whether time interval is from beginning of first time to beginning
ot second time or to end of second time (circle one, or describe alternate).
Calculated By;
Checked Bv:
.-
Date:
^- /
-------
JBI3.Q
—— GEM DATA REDUCTION - BAG ANALYSIS OR STEADY READINGS
Location:
Date:
Parameter: SO2, C02, Q2,
Operator:
Project #:
Pollutant, ppm/% = (Chart Division'
m
Run
#
Kl6-=>-^
Time**
(24-Hr)
13: 5 i - i4*i-a,
- 1 ^ -1^
- \^'.->T~
-\4\y\
-I4-.41
-14.:-^
— /jT.'^J3
-/<:/«?
Average
Chart
Division
44
4S
^0
^3
42.
41
31?
42
Concentration
/>/>"?
-V42.7
432. 4
VA? 4
4^2 l^>
4 22 5"
412 4
3&Z £>
422. ^>
Comments
cru^v^. <
M^4lk.2*i*ifl*A
nNq ^m' ^jrmrrr
* For NOX Indicate whether NO, NO + NO2 , or NO2 for specific interval.
** Indicate whether time interval is from beginning of first time to beginning
or second time or to end of second time (circle one, or describe alternate).
Calculated By:
Checked By:
/-.-
Date:.
Date:
S4-* -7
-------
INITIAL CEM CALIBRATION AND PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
Plant: _
Location:
Date: 5.19.9-7
Parameter: SO2, C02, Q2.
Monitor: cffpfrjter %
Span Value: 100
Operator: _
Project #:
P.
Chart Scale: /0-/Mf)
Pbar, in. Hq.:
Cylinder
#
AA.L.-7IO
AAUfc^li
ALM02.Blbl
Cal. Gas
Cone.,
O
Chart Divisions
Direct
Injection
to Monitor
O.G
.27r>.s| zs. o
4bi.^
B*fe,7
4T Z
^0.3
Injection
Through
System
o. 1
27. k
4fe.k
81. 0
1
Concentration
Predicted by
Equation,*
Direct System
-1.1 -0,1
173. U Zlo^.l
•MW3L 4- ^^k.S
Aftt->.2- S73.4
Calibration
Error,"*
% of Opan
6»PK-S
1. 15
0.19
Sampling
System
Bias,"*
% of Span
o. 1
o.4
O.b
1,3
* Perform linear regression of pretest cal. gas concentration vs. chart divisions to
determine the following equation:
y = mx + b x = ppm y = chart divisions
For Data Reduction:
Pollutant, ppm/% = (Chart Division - b) = (CD-o./7(3) •
m
(o./oitfl )
Correlation Coefficient =
Calculation concentration predicted by equatio using actual chart response
obtained from each calibration gas response.
Analyzer cal. error, % cal. gas vaJue = (Cal. gas cone., ppm - cone, predicted, ppm) x 100
Cal. gas value, ppm
Acceptable limit = < 2% of calibration gas value (< 5% for THC)
(Direct inject, gas cone. - System inject, gas cone.) x 100
Span value
*** Sampling system bias =
Acceptable limit < 5% of span
Minimum detectable limit = 2% of span or 20 ppm or % (circle one)
Rise time to 95% of response for high cal. gas injected through the system
(return to zero after each injection): s, s, s Average = 2fj s
Precision, % scale = difference in chart division response for two repeated
injections of the gas concentrations = - « %
(Clock time *= )
-------
3 a a cu
DAILY CEM CALIBRATION AND PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
Plant:
Location:
Date:
Parameter: SO2, CO2, O2,
Monitor:
Operator: p. <^e
Project #:
Span Value: 100
Time, Pretest: a-.to Post-test: /S.-
Run#: RE-S-I gc.^-z
Chart Scale: O-IQQO
Pbar, in. Hg.:
Ambient Temp., F:
Cyl.
#
Cal. Gas
Cone.,
q5pm>r%
0
J7t>.5
4te.*
»Ah.1
Calibrations (Chart Divisions)
S'-lft ID-.44 //.'<0 /V33 /S.'V
£• / o.o r\. o o.o o. o
27. U ?S<\ 25.0 12 5. A
4A.A 44.0 4Z.b 4i.4 4i.ft
g 4^W.a 4'\Z.I2, 410?| ^34.^
8LL.2- M4l g^.^ 85k.!
Analyzer
Calibration
Error,"
) % of Span
#
a. //
DrMl,*"
% of Span
/3. /
2.L
* Perform linear regression of pretest cal. gas concentration vs. chart divisions to
determine the following equation:
y = mx + b x = ppm y = chart divisions
For Data Reduction:
Pollutant, ppm/% = (Chart Division - b) = (CD -
m
Correlation Coefficient =
**
Analyzer cal. error, % cal. gas vaJue = (Cal. gas cone.-cone, predicted) x 100
Cal. gas value, ppm
Acceptable limit = < 2% of calibration gas value (< 5% for THC)
***
Drift, % Span
(Post-test cal. response - initial cal. response) x 100
Span value
Acceptable limit < 3% of span
Minimum detectable limit = 2% of span or 20 (tjp"rn)or % (circle one)
Maximum zero drift » % of span or ppm or % (drde one)
Maximum calibration drift * % of span or ppm or % (drde one)
COMMENTS: Pretest or post-test (drde one) calibration used to quantitate
sample data. Post-test is used if drift exceeds limits and if post-test
yields higher concentrations.
-------
_
= GEM DATA REDUCTION - BAG ANALYSIS OR STEADY READINGS
Plant:
Location:
Date: t
Parameter: SO2, CO2, QZ, NOX*CTHS)CO
Operator: /?
Project #:
Pollutant, ppm/%
= (Chart Division - b) =
m
Run
Time**
(24-Hr)
Average
Chart
Division
Concentration
Comments
JTU/K 5S"
RE-S-I
//.o
-
* For NOX Indicate whether NO, NO + N02, or NO2 for specific interval.
**
Indicate whether time interval is from beginning of first time to beginning
or second time or to end of second time (circle one, or describe alternate).
Calculated Bv:
Checked Bv:
Date:.
Date:
-------
-.
= ^ CEM DATA REDUCTION - BAG ANALYSIS OR STEADY READINGS
Plant:
Location: -R00^
Date:
Parameter: SO2, C02, O2. NOx*CTHC7pO
Operator:
Project #:
(Chart Division - b)
(CD -Q.2S+)
m (0./00/4- )
Run
#
R£-5^3
Time**
(24-Hr)
73 :S"5 -/•+• '°J>
i4'oi - i4M2>
I4-.-I3 — i4: Z3>
-14.3^
-14:43
-h:«52>
-iS.'i)2,
-/5.'/^
Average
Chart
Division
//
//
7^.5
7/9
/o.<
/£ ^
/2
rf
Concentraton
/O/CM
/A 7. 3
72,3
//7 ^
737. ^
Comments
M^-/ffl.2~M &f»*
* For NOX Indicate whether NO, NO + NO2, or NO2 for specific interval.
**
Indicate whether time interval is from beginning of first time to beginning
of second time or to end of second time (circle one, or describe alternate).
Calculated By:.
Checked By:_
' •&
Pater
Date':
*~I4- 3*7
-------
INITIAL CEM CALIBRATION AND PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
Plant:
Location:
Date:
Parameter: SO2, CO2, Og,
Monitor:
Operator: £.
Project #:
Span Value: 100
Chart Scale: _^-y
o.-*,
0.~7
1. 1
* Perform linear regression of pretest caJ. gas concentration vs. chart divisions to
determine the following equation:
y = mx + b ' x = ppm y = chart divisions
For Data Reduction:
/% = (Chan Division - b) = (CD
Pollutant, ppm/%
Correlation Coefficient =
m
(O.IOIT.I )
Calculation concentration predicted by equatio using actual chart response
obtained from each calibration gas response.
**
Analyzer cal. error, % cat. gas value
(Cal. gas cone., ppm - cone, predicted, ppm) x 100
CaJ. gas value, ppm
Acceptable limit = < 2% of calibration gas value (< 5% for THC)
***
Sampling system bias =
-------
3 go a
DAILY GEM CALIBRATION AND PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
Plant: _
Location:
Date:
Parameter: SO2.
Monitor:
. C-2.
Operator: ^
Project #:
Time, Pretest: a-.2.0 Post-test:
Run#: AF-5-i
Span Value: 100
Chart Scale: ^-
Pbar, in. Hg.: _
Ambient Temp., F: 75
Cyl.
#
Cal. Gas
J39JJC-
(£pn>or%
ft
270.1
44,3.^
3*^.7
Calibrations (Chart Divisions)
8:2.0 Ift'.^O |-»y.«Ln
0.0 6.1 0-0
-?^ 0 ^^.^
V6.D V^.z
S«.-^ v.o
Concentration Predicted
By Equation*
A'.ZO IP: ^O
<5 3 / 3
3"7/ O 24*9 *)
•#£,/ -4 4J3 "=S
&&~) V 8/2.2.
Analyzer
Calibration
Error.*"
% of Span
0.33
ft 41
DrHt,*"
% of Span
DJ
2./I
3.BI
* Perform linear regression of pretest cal. gas concentration vs. chart divisions to
determine the following equation:
y « mx + b x = ppm y = chart divisions
For Data Reduction:
Pollutant, ppm/% = = _
m
)
Correlation Coefficient =
Analyzer cat. error, % cal. gas value
(Cal. gas cone. - cone, predicted) x 100
Cal. gas value, ppm
Acceptable limit = < 2% of calibration gas value (< 5% for THC)
***
Drift, % Span =
(Post-test cal. response - initial cal. response) x 100
Span value
Acceptable limit < 3% of span
Minimum detectable limit = 2% of span or ^ (gpm^r % (circle one)
Maximum zero drift = % of span or ppm or % (cirde one)
Maximum calibration drift » % of span or ppm or % (cirde one)
COMMENTS: Pretest or post-test (drde one) calibration used to quantitate
sample data. Post-test is used if drift exceeds limits and if post-test
yields higher concentrations.
-------
-
3— GEM DATA REDUCTION - BAG ANALYSIS OR STEADY READINGS
Plant: LMV^
Location: AuL*»i_ipa?y P^KI
Date: ^-A,q . 'q-7
PC
Run
#
*F -5-1
AvF-S-2.
Parameter: SO2, C02, O2, NOX«. 14
- 10.-2.U,
//'•<& -/fi/fi
-JI--23
-//:w
~l/:4f>>
- //--5&
-t->\&A
- \i: 18
-\-2-llQ
- h.l^O
m (o.os^"
Average
Chart
Division
/
S3
S3
/4
V-A
y
Concentration
/qp'r?
J4S.7
/4eS ~l
7^5.7
/4sn
A5Y).7
i son
/s^n
/^f>.~7
/3£> lr>
/lO.lz,
/4o &
11* )
Comments
3LkYY\_l^>
Av/6,- H
\-& . & ^vvw ftft^V
r^i^nif^ ' '"f
AV/^J- ll^fl oorw-rrop
/J&trtt. \jJ0J-T
GUY /A] ^"(JiftA
A^ALvy 2-S7$_
1
Z^J
* For NOX Indicate whether NO, NO + N02, or NO2 for specific interval.
** Indicate whether time interval is from beginning of first time to beginning
or second time or to end of second time (circle one, or describe alternate).
Calculated By:.
Checked By:_
Date:.
Date:.
-------
INITIAL CEM CALIBRATION AND PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
Plant:
-o
Location:
Date:
Parameter: SO2, C02, Q2,
Monitor: (0pn>br %
Operator:
Project #:
P.
Span Value: 100
Chart Scale: ^
Pbar, in. Hg.:
Ab
SuA
-&&1
IV. 53
\5'.\5
Cylinder
#
AAL-710
AAvLlSSli
Auv\jO2.aifc)l
C*l. Gas
Cone.,
xppm)or %
o
no. 5
4t,3,.^
8 ^^.7
Chart Divisions
Direct
Injection
to Monitor
o.o
-2.7.?>
VM1
S^.P)
Injection
Through
System
o.o
2\a.$
45.^
Bj9.£>
I
Concentration
Predicted by
Equation,*
Direct System
S.4 S.4
27/.0 2t,/. /
4
&&&A £7/0. fe
.
Calibration
Error,"
TO of op An
&#$
O./A
£>.7P>
Sampling
System
Bias,***
% of Span
o.o
/.O
T>^/./
/.&
* Perform linear regression of pretest cal. gas concentration vs. chart divisions to
determine the following equation:
y «• mx + b x = ppm y = chart divisions
For Data Reduction:
Pollutant, ppm/% = (Chart Division - b) =
m
(0.10122 )
Correlation Coefficient =
Calculation concentration predicted by equatio using actual chart response
obtained from each calibration gas response.
•* Analyzer cal. error, % cal. gas value = (Cal. gas cone., ppm - cone, predicted, ppm) x 100
Cal. gas value, ppm
Acceptable limit = < 2% of calibration gas value (< 5% for THC)
*** Sampling system bias = -
Acceptable limit < 5% of span
(Direct inject, gas cone. - System inject, gas cone.) x 100
Span value
Minimum detectable limit = 2% of span or
r % (circle one)
Rise time to 95% of response for high cal. gas injected through the system
(return to zero after each injection): s, s, s Average « Z3 s
-Precision, % scale = difference in chart division response for two repeated
injections of the gas concentrations =. - • %
(Clock time = )
-------
DAILY CEM CALIBRATION AND PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
Plant:
Location:
Date:
1 1
Parameter: SO2, C02, O2, NO>
Monitor:
- \<\ -g~7
Operator: />. ,
Project #\
Span Value: 100
84o6-
Time, Pretest:
Run #:
Chart Scale: £>-
Pbar, in. Hg.:
-77
Post-test: is-.2O Ambient Temp., F:
Cyl.
#
<
Cal. Gas
Cone.,
0
270,t5
^u.^.-i
^S^.l
Calibrations (Chart Divisions)
13,: io IS -.2.0
/9.0 A.O
^A.^5
^.•b 4L.O
AA.o
Concentration Predicted
By Equatksn"
^'•ajO IS'.2_0
.1.4 --1.4
J&8.Z
453. -=r v^-4-fT
5^^, V
Analyzer
Calibration
Error,*"
% of Span
O.&S
£>,&2.
DrHl—
% of Span
o .0
^.^
* Perform linear regression of pretest cal. gas concentration vs. chart divisions to
determine the following equation:
y «* mx + b x = ppm y = chart divisions
For Data Reduction:
Pollutant, ppm/% = (Cha"D'vision'b'
m
)
Correlation Coefficient
Analyzer cal. error, % cal. gas value
(Cal. gas cone. - cone, predicted) x 100
Cal. gas value, ppm
Acceptable limit = < 2% of calibration gas value (< 5% for THC)
***
Drift, % Span «
(Post-test cal. response - initial cal. response) x 100
Span value
Acceptable limit < 3% of span
Minimum detectable limit = 2% of span or 2& rggm^r % (circle one)
Maximum zero drift = % of span or ppm or % (cirde one)
Maximum calibration drift = % of span or ppm or % (drde one)
COMMENTS: Pretest or post-test (drde one) calibration used to quantitater
sample data Post-test Is used If drift exceeds limits and If post-test-
yields higher concentrations.
-------
a ca
GEM DATA REDUCTION - BAG ANALYSIS OR STEADY READINGS
Plant:
Location:
Date:
-iq -q-7
Parameter: SO2, CO2, O2, NOx*w*& )
Run
#
AF-5-^,
Time**
(24-Hr)
is-.s^b-/-/.-^
-/4:/.i
-/4:2*
'•::•>. -j4'-tt
-/v.y?
-/4<;-?a
-S^.'/>^
-/
-------
LASCO Panel Products
Condition 6 - Main Exhaust
Total Hydrocarbons (THC)
19-May-97
Calibration Gases
0.0 ppm
270.5 ppm
463.3 ppm
866.7 ppm
System Calibration
3.5
274.5
465.5
900.7
Calibration Error
0.84%
2.28%
Correlation 0.9997496
Slope 1.0353339
Intercept -3.2129775
888.2
16:05-17:05 Run 6-1
l^^^HBB^—^^^^B
17:08 PostCal
17:33-18:56 Run 6-2 | 895.5
18:57 PostCal
19:37-20:19 Run 6-3 | 905.4
15:16 PostCal
Corrected 861.0 ppm THC |
3.5
469.3
Drift 0.00%
0.38%
Corrected 868.0 ppm THC
-0.4
476.9
Drift 0.39%
1.14%
Corrected 877.6 ppm THC |
3.5
469.3
Drift 0.00%
0.38%
Pagel
-------
p
p
n
P
R
0
P
A
N
E
1888.8-
ff\n A ,
800.0-
780.0
£08.0
* **
480.0
380.0
c«0.0
180.0
0n
*O
LflSCO Panel
1
Products,
System Calibration Drift Check
Calibration
Cases
8.8 ppn Prcpane
463.3 ppn Prcpane
270.5 ppn Prcpane
866.7 ppn Prcpane
3.5
465.5
274.5
908.7
^ 3.5
15'28 15-38 15'32 15'34 15'36 15'38 15'40 15'42 15-44
ppn 19 Ma« -97. is >27 no MA IN EXHAUST
P
P
n
P
R
0
P
A
N
E
1100.0
1660.0-
S«0.0-
£80.8
788.0
€00.0
-00.0
408.0
:e0.0
200.0
lee.e
0.8
LflSCO Panel Products / l
Run ME-6-1 16-65 - 17'CS f\
VlvyNvWl**^^ 1 l,A
.
\ A V^
\ A
Mean 888.2 ppn Prcpane \ j >)
ppn
16'18
19 May '97. 16' 03 '80
16'48 16'58
MAIN EXHAUST
(HH'Mtl)
-------
p
p
n
P
A
N
E
p
p
n
p
R
0
P
A
N
E
P
P
n
P
R-
P
A
N
E
W0.0-
£88.8
700.0
£fl0. e
?«0.0
488.8
388.8
£«8.0
100.0
0.8
I
LflSCO Panel Products
Systen Calibration Drift Check /
Calibration Gases
8.0 ppn Propane
463.3 ppn Propane
469.3 J
[~
.
.
3.5 j
17'89 17=10 17=11 17=12 17=13 17=14 17=15 17=16
ppn 19 May'97,17'08'36 MAIN EXHAUST
s«0.e-
£88.8
788.8
£60.0
ree.e
488.8
see.e
£88.8
188.8
8.8
LfiSCO Panel Products 1.
Run nE-6-2 17=33-18=56 ^
Mean 895.5 ppn Propane
17=40 17=50 18=88 18=18 18=£8 18=38 18=48 18=58
ppn 19 nay'97. 17=31 =80 MAIM EXHAUST (HH-MM)
IcvB.o
900.0
£80.0
700.0
600.0-
m
oVV*0 *
400.0
300.0
£08.0
LASCO Panel Products '
Systen Calibration Drift Check
Calibraticn Gases
463.3 ppn Propane
0.0 ppn Propane
476.9
-------
p
p
n
p
R
0
P
ft
N
E
P
P
n
P
p
0
P
ft
N
E
1088.8'
£80.0
780.0
£08.0
MB. 8
400.0
"-fl8 0
avje.e
100.0
0.8
1
vff^^\^^\^^^
LflSCO Panel Products
Run ME-6-3 19-37 - 20-19
Mean 98S.4 ppn Propane
19-35 19-40 19-45 19-50 19-55 20-W 20-05 20-10 20-15
ppn 19 May'97. 19-35-80 MAIM EXHAUST (HH-MII)
1800.8 I
S«0.0-
£80.0
700.0
£00.8
500.8
400.0
:ao.0
cfla.e
100.8
0A
. 0
I
LaSCO Panel Products
Systen Calibration Drift Check' ' ,. «.
Calibration Gases
0.0 ppn Propane
463.3 ppn Propane
469.3
f ' 1
3.5 | \
ppn
20 - 85 20 - 26
19 May'97,£9<24<23
20' 27 i-Q 28
MAIN EXHAUST
28-C-5-
20-30
20-31
(HH'HM)
-------
LASCO Panel Products
Condition 6 - Room Exhaust
Total Hydrocarbons (THC)
19-May-97
Calibration Gases
0.0 ppm
270.5 ppm
463.3 ppm
886.7 ppm
System Calibration
-0.4
255.5
434.9
835.8
Calibration Error
0.37%
0.32%
Correlation 0.999996
Slope 0.9425626
Intercept -0.4056875
16:05-17:07 Run 6-1 | 154.4
17:08 PostCal
17:33-18:56 Run 6-2 | 137.2
18:57 PostCal
106.7
16:05-17:07 Run 6-3
u^_^_^_^^_
15:16 PostCal
Corrected 164.2 ppm THC |
-0.4
431.1
Drift 0.00%
0.38%
Corrected 146.0 ppm THC
-0.4
431.1
Drift 0.00%
0.38%
Corrected 113.6 ppm THC
-0.4
450.2
Drift 0.00%
1.53%
Page 1
-------
p
p
N
P
R
0
P
A
E
1000.0-
seo.0-
£88.0
708.0
t00.0
M8.0
408.0
388.0
c«0.0
100.0
0ft
• V
l
LASCO Panel Products
Systen Calibration Drift Check
Calibration Cases
0.0 ppn Propane
463.3 ppn Propane
270.5 ppn Propane
866.7 ppn Propane
434.9
f~ \
-0.4
1 355.5
\
835.8
'86 IS'28 15'38 15^32 15'34 15'36 15'38
ppn 19 May '97, 15 -35 '55 ROOM EXHAUST (HH-MM)
-------
p
F
n
p
R
o
p
A
N
E
£80.0
700.0
£80.0
780.0
400.0
380.0
£00.0
100.0
0.0
LASCO Panel Products
Run RE-6-1 16-05 - 17-07
(lean 154.4 ppn Propane
\
I
r*^^
rT
ppn
16'ie
19 Ma«'97,16'03'00
. as
16-38 16-40
ROOM EXHAUST
16=50
17-00
(HH-MM)
P
P
n
p
R
o
p
A
N
E
s«8.0
E80.0
7BB.8
£00.0
M0.0
400.0
380.0
£00.0
100.0
0.0
ppn
i
LASCO Panel Products
System Calibration Drift Check
Calibration Casts
0.0 ppm Propane
463.3 PF« Propane
-0.4
431.1
17-09 17-10 17-11 17'18 17:13 17-14 17^15 17^16
19 Maw '97. 17- 08- ZS. ROOM EXHAUST CHH-MM)
p
p
n
p
R
0
p
A
N
E
1080.0'
SQ0.0
£80.0
780.0
€60.0
*80.0
400.0
380.0
c«0.0
100.0
0.0
PP"
1
LASCO Panel Products
Run RE-6-2 17-33 - 18-36
•
Mean 137.2 ppn Propane
-~s^^. ^^^
' - i. _, ^ ^
17-40 17-50 18i80 18-10 18-20 18-30 18-40 18-50
19 Hav'97, 17-31 -00 ROOM EXHAUST (HH>m>
-------
p
p
H
P
R
0
P
A
N
E
1660.0'
980.0
£80.8
700.0
£00.0
400.0
380.0
£80.0
100.0
0.0
1
LftSCO Panel Products
Susten Calibration Drift Check
Calibration Gases
0.0 ppn Propane
463.3 ppn Propane
-0.4
431.1
*~
\
L
P
p
n
p
R
0
p
A
M
E
18'58 18'59 19'C« 19'01 19'02 19'03 19'04 19'05
ppm 19 May '97. 18 '57 '38 ROOM EXHAUST
iro0.0 |
988.8-
680.0-
780.0
€88.0
M0.0-
400.0-
380.8
£80.0-
100.0 •
0.0-
LftSCO Panel Products
Run RE-6-3 19 '37 - 20° 19 -•'••:
(lean 186.7 ppn Propane
19'35 19--40 19'45 19-50 19^55 20'te 20'05 20'10 20'15
ppn 19 May'97.19'35'00 ROOM EXHAUST (HH.MM)
P
p
n
p
R
o
p
N
E
1CB0.0
980.0
£80.0
708. 0
€80.0
400.0
280.0
£80.0
100.0
0.0
ppn
i
LflSCO Panel Products
SusUm Calibration Drift Check
Calibration Cases
0.0 ppn Prcpane
463.3 ppn Prcpane
-0.4
4?e.2
\
-
20-21 20 '22 20 '23 £8 '24 20 '25 20 '26 20-27 20-28 £8-89 20-30 20-31
19 Maw '97, Si '29- 39 ROOM EXHAUST
-------
IP
DAILY CEM CALIBRATION AND PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
Plant:
Parameter: SO2, CO2, 02, NO><1>?C)
Location: M MM £v ^PW «rr
Date: <=>.,« .4-7
Operator: P r-Sicr-cL.
Project #: RA-r^.r^-a.
Time, Pretest: i^:;*£> Post-test:
Monitor: cg^br %
Span Value: 100
Chart Scale: £-/fflQ zvu** /rAswsjf.
Pbar. in. Hq.: ?fl. -re> or%
d. 0
270.S
4t,l.*
3*A.7
Calibrations (Chart Divisions)
IS'.:v>) /7.70 i4:rr> ?O\T.<^
0>.^ £>.& K.B O.<:
27. *>
4L.-I 4k.l 4.1 A 4L.-1
30. G
Concentration Predicted
By Equation"
/./ (,./ L. / J /
-77/ /
y^ ^9 -^6/C> ^4^^ 4LO.O
8&8.Z
Analyzer
Calibration
Error,""
% of Span
0,22.
0.71
Drift,""
% of Span
<9.3
D.L
* Perform linear regression of pretest cal. gas concentration vs. chart divisions to
determine the following equation:
y « mx + b x = ppm y = chart divisions
For Data Reduction:
Pollutant, ppm/% = (Chart Division - b) =
m
(0./OII2- )
Correlation Coefficient =
Analyzer cat. error, % cal. gas value
(Cal. gas cone. - cone, predicted) x 100
Cal. gas value, ppm
Acceptable limit = < 2% of calibration gas value (< 5% for THC)
***
Drift, % Span
(Post-test cal. response - initial cal. response) x 100
Span value
Acceptable limit < 3% of span
Minimum detectable limit» 2% of span or ZO (ggfrvtor % (circle one)
Maximum zero drift = % of span or ppm or % (cirde one)
Maximum calibration drift = % of span or ppm or % (drde one)
COMMENTS: Pretest or post-test (drde one) calibration used to quantitate
sample data. Post-test is used if drift exceeds limits and if post-test
yields higher concentrations.
-------
GEM DATA REDUCTION - BAG ANALYSIS OR STEADY READINGS
Parameter: SO2, C02, 02, NOxtTtHC)CO
Location: K^.K) h_yHpsLJl2rr Operator: fl 3/f&{E^
Date: 5-1^-9-7 Project #: %4n<=>. oc^
Pollutant, ppm/%
Run
,; 4
Me-b-i
ME-b-2.
ME-V,-*
Time**
(24-Hr)
ik:os-iLy. i^
- 1 u. •• ? ^
-''I IV. •»,«=,
-iu:^=,
-ik:^
-mm
IT-l^- n>.^
- /7'^
—/&.'£>*
-(^'•{^
- /ft : •?-*.
-/P.- -a,*.
~/fi:4i
-lA\e^
/^.'•?/7-/f./y7
-/4f<7
-*n:o*7
-2.e>'.i4
(Chart Division - b) (CD -o.i&S )
m (o./o//2 )
Average
Chart
Division
US
£2) ^
8&8,2-
£&S>* 1
&qe>.(
lOT.i
B^3.2-
Ba&.z.
B&3 3
8£A 2_
g>g,3 TJ
^a3.,-2,
gBft ,2.
888, Z
^v^ og/.^^pnirei|
Axl^- ^4-.^- »«* Px-
<*<^
ip*^-**<
* For NOX Indicate whether NO, NO + NO2, or NO2 for specific interval.
** lUS08*8 HHliether time interval is from beginning of first time to beginning
or second time or to end of second time (circle one, or describe alternate).
Calculated By:__
Checked By:
^~+~}
Date:.
Date:
-------
a a
— OEM DATA REDUCTION - BAG ANALYSIS OR STEADY READINGS
Plant:
Parameter: SO2, C02, Q2, NOx*.CrHJ
Location: "R^^ Exw^uKry Operator: A ^/e^s-L.
Date: ^ _ iq _q-j Project #: ff4/}^. <3<0 *>
PC
Run
#
*(?e-fcrl
•RE-b-2.
RE-V.--K
tantrrm/o/n_ (Chart Division - b) _ (CD-**tf)
" m (o.rt+tA )
Time**
(24-Hr)
//^S-^.'/'S"
- /6.'Z5
-/A.'i^
->A-4^5
-/^ .'^.^
-/7-61
J-j:^- 17:42
- y7.- 53
-/A:s>^
-tto'.tl
-/6:z*,
-)8:3$
-W.4l
~/&'.m,
/4:*7-&4.7
-A:*7
—>t>.'f>7
-2t>:/1
Average
Chart
Division
X-/5-
/5"
/5.7
/6>
/6
/7
/a
/7
/L
/<:
/3.g
/Z
//.£
//.o
/O.S
/o. <
//.O
//.o
Concentration
j>P*
75*2.7
/57.^
7^5.3
/4g.^
/A8 5
/?4rf>^ /^>4
^^ ^ -^ ^^^r T«
MJ^r //3,/ **-, /2^-
*r
^
* For NOX Indicate whether NO, NO + NO2, or NO2 for specific interval.
** Indicate whether time interval is from beginning of first time to beginning
or second time or to end of second time (circle one, or describe alternate).
Calculated By:_
Checked By:
r
RiatB.
-------
3 OC3 CZ3
DAILY CEM CALIBRATION AND PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
Parameter: SO2, CO?, O2, NOx.CfH?)
Location: -R^^ ^v^.^r-
Date: ^_iq_c|-,
Operator: R ^IP^L
Project*: /£-'3.2>
66^.1
Cftlibrations (Chart Oivlsiona)
IS'.^O /77^ /^.'/« 2A-z^
25. fc
43. ft 4^5, 4-S.R 45^. A
a4.6
Concentration Predicted
By Equation*
-0.5 -0.5 -O.S -O.S
217.. O
4b2.2- 4sb3 4W.7_ 474.3
8at>.e>
I
Analyzer
Calibration
Error,'"
0.<^
..2.4
Drift,*"
% of Span
o.O
* Perform linear regression of pretest cal. gas concentration vs. chart divisions to
determine the following equation:
y » mx + b x = ppm y = chart divisions
For Data Reduction:
Pollutant, ppm/% = (Chart Division - b) = (CD -o.
m
Correlation Coefficient =
**
Analyzer cal. error, % cal. gas value
(Cal. gas cone. - cone, predicted) x 100
Cal. gas value, ppm
Acceptable limit = < 2% of calibration gas value (< 5% for THC)
***
Drift, % Span =
(Post-test cal. response - initial cal. response) x 100
Span value
Acceptable limit < 3% of span
Minimum detectable limit = 2% of span or 2.O rggw % (circle one)
Maximum zero drift = % of span or ppm or % (drde one)
Maximum calibration drift = . % of span or ppm or % (drde one)
COMMENTS: Pretest or post-test (drde one) calibration used to quantitate
sample data. Post-test is used if drift exceeds limits and if post-test
yields higher conceritratu
-------
APPENDIX A.2.9
Condition 7 Method 25A
-------
LASCO Panel Products
Condition 7 - Main Exhaust
Total Hydrocarbons (THC)
20-May-97
Calibration Gases
0.0 ppm
270.5 ppm
463.3 ppm
886.7 ppm
System Calibration
-4.2
266.9
457.8
881.6
Direct Calibration
-4.2
270.7
465.5
896.9
Correlation 0.9999983
Slope 0.9985874
Intercept -4.0277298
Sampling System Bias
0.00%
0.38%
0.77%
1.53%
Correlation 0.9999989
Slope 1.0160811
Intercept -4.414859
Calibration Error
0.10%
0.09%
14:49-16:15 Run 7-1 712.5
Corrected 717.5 ppm THC |
Calibration Gases
0.0 ppm
270.5 ppm
463.3 ppm
886.7 ppm
System Calibration
-0.4
274.5
465.5
893.1
Calibration Error
0.68%
0.27%
17:03-18:28 Run 7-2
18:35
19:11-20:35 Run 7-3
20:42
Correlation
Slope
Intercept
0.9999935
1.0067863
0.3006978
865.5
Post Cal
882.8
Post Cal
3.5
465.5
3.5
473.1
Corrected 859.4
Drift 0.39%
0.00%
Corrected 876.6
Drift 0.39%
0.76%
ppm THC
ppm THC
Pagel
-------
£88.8
p
p 780.8
n
608.8
P
R*
0 408.8
P
A 280.8
M
E £68.0
188.8
0n
.V
LASCO Panel Products
896.9 Direct vs. Systen Calibrations /• eil~6
Calibration Cases
886.7 ppn Propane
463.3 ppn Propane
270.5 ppn Propane
0.0 ppn Propane
463.5
270.7
-4.2
13-36 13-38 13-48 13-42 13-44 13-46 13-48
ppn 28 May '97. 13 <33 -27 MAIN EXHAUST
£88.8
P
p 700.0
n £80.8
P
„ T88.8
R
0 480.0
P
A 280.0
N
E £88.8
188.8
0.0'
LASCO Panel Products
Styrene Calibrations
Calibration Cases
1
-
457.8
266.9
1
-4.2
13-50 13-52 13-54 13-56
(HH-MM)
1
250.7 ppn Styrene
143. 1 ppn Styrene
102 ppn Styrcne ,*•
f
381.3 /
r
0.0 ppn I
-4.2 /
/
423.5
0.0 ppn
-9.4
ppn 20 May '97. 13 -55 -56 MA IN EXHAUST
1680.0
£88.8
p
p 788.8
n
£80.0
p
„ M8.8
R
0 408.8
P
A 280.0
N
E £88.8
188.8
8.8
LASCO Panel Products
Run ME-7-1 14-49 - 16 '15
JJUVi *r**/\ /V% j\Ax /VV\ ^Jif^^\ ^*^^^A^k/^**A
nean 712.5 ppn Propane
14-02 14-83 14-84
1!
/v/xAyv
A A P
A/Vv/VWVv/
14-58 13-80 13-10 13-20^ ,. 13J» .15-40 WM I6'eo ,£'&
oom 28 rlau'97.14.47'80 MAIN EXHAUST (HH'MM)
-------
ieea.8'
90e. e
eee.e
p
„ Tee.e
p
n
£0e. e
p
R* "
0 488.8
P
A :ee.e
N
E £0e.e
lee.e
e.e
LASCO Panel Products
893. 1 ]
Calibration Cases
8.0 ppn Propane
463.3 ppn Propane
886.7 ppn Propane
278.5 ppn Propane
465.5
274.5
3.5 -8.4
16-22 16-24 16-26 16-28 16-38 16-32 16-34 16-36 16-38 16-40
ppn 28 Mav'97. 16-21 <15 MAIN EXHAUST
1888.8 1
988.8
eee.e
p
p 7-ee.e
n
P -aaa
R -
i eee.e
*ee. e
Eee.e
p
p Tee.e
n
£Afl R
p
R
0 488.8
P
A ;0e.e
N
E £08.8
1
LASCO Panel Products
Sustifi Calibration Drift Check
Calibration Cases
8.8 ppn Propane
278.5 ppn Prcpane
465.5
r
18-36 18-37
29 Mag'97,18'33'33
18-38
18-39 18-40 18-41
MAIN EXHAUST
18-42
18-43
18-44
(HH.HH>
-------
p
p
n
P
R
0
P
A
N
E
£80.8
780. 0
600.0
~ '
400.0
380.0
£80.8
100.0
0.0
1
ppn
LflSCO Panel Products 1
.. i/\* «* A ii /**A rt • A* ft J^n^iA^. «iJi*wjyiMj^ir%^*^k^/^Wfi*— \ rt_uL/tA /^
f\^ M/^/vO* V\A/^*"'*^ vrv»T^/«^vvv^ v* r v ^ ^^ *VP' * *•
Run ME-7-3 19-11 - 20-C-S
Mean 882.8 ppn Propane
9-18 19-28 19-38 19-48 19-58 20-00
20 nav'97. 19-09-08 MAIN EXHAUST
i
VvyVWVs.^^vvs^V^VN^ys
20-18 20-28 20-30
P
p
n
P
R
0
P
A
N
£
s«0.0
£88.0
780.0
600.0
re0.0
400.8
380.0
180.0
0.0
2
PP«
L
LflSCO Panel Products
Syften Calibration Drift Check
Calibration Cases
0.0 ppn Propane
270.5 ppn Propane .
.
3.5
473.1
\
(
3-43 20-44 20-45 28-46 28-47 c8-48 20-49 20-58 28-51 20-52
20 May '97. £«- 42- 53 MAIN EXHAUST (HH-MM)
-------
LASCO Panel Products
Condition 7 - Room Exhaust
Total Hydrocarbons (THC)
20-May-97
Calibration Gases
0.0 ppm
84.1 ppm
270.5 ppm
463.3 ppm
System Calibration
0.1
85.8
271.9
462.2
Direct Calibration
0.1
85.8
276.1
466.4
Correlation 0.9999857
Slope 0.9967115
Intercept 1.2023939
Sampling System Bias
0.00%
0.00%
0.76%
0.76%
Correlation 0.9999642
Slope 1.0073998
Intercept 1.1169561
Calibration Error
0.02%
0.91%
14:49-16:15 Run 7-1
99\0
Corrected 98.1 ppm THC
Calibration Gases
0.0 ppm
84.1 ppm
270.5 ppm
463.3 ppm
System Calibration
0.1
87.9
282.4
481.0
Calibration Error
0.06%
0.35%
Correlation 0.9999944
Slope 1.0382807
Intercept 0.5527431
108.9
17:03-18:28 Run 7-2
18:32 PostCal
Corrected 104.4 ppm THC
0.1
282.4
Drift 0.00%
0.00%
19:11-20:35 Run 7-3 | 106.1
20:40 Post Cal
Corrected 101.7 ppm THC
0.1
280.3
Drift 0.00%
0.38%
Pacel
-------
p
p
n
P
R
0
P
A
N
E
M8.0
450.0'
408.8
358.8
380.0
£50.0
£«8.0
158.0
188.8
58.8
0.8
1
ppn
466.4
276.1
LASCO Panel Products
Direct vs. Systen Calibrations
Calibration Gases
463.3 PPB Propane
278.5 ppn Propane
84.eQ ppn Propane
0.8 ppn Propane
£5.8
0.1
/
I
462.2 ;
I 271.9
85.8
1
I •••
3'36 13'38 13'40 13-42 13'44 13^46 13<48 13-50 13-52 13-54 13^56
28 May '97. 13<35 -45 ROOM EXHAUST (HH-MM)
P
P
n
P
R
0
P
A
N
E
?ee.o
Y
450.0
480.0
330.8
388.8
£50.0
£88 8
158.8
iee.8
58.8
o.e
LASCO Panel Products
Styrene Calibration * Calibration Gases
£', £58.7 ppn Styrene
,, |
r 445.5
1
143.1 ppn Styrene
^ \J 328.8 \ 102 ppn Styrene
^ -<7 7
£67.7
^ 2.2
P
P
n
P
R
0
P
A
N
E
ppn i
598.8'
588.8
450.0
400.0
358.8
388.0
£50.0
£«0.0
150.8
108.8
58.8
8.8
14-06 14=08 14=16 14=12 14=14 14=16 14=
>8 I1au.'97. 14 = 04-45 ROOM EXHAUST (HH-MM)
LASCO Panel Products
Run FE-7-1 14-49 - 16 -J5
Mean 99.8 ppn Propane
^^^""^^^v^^ — ^^^
\J •" V V
18
14-Se 13 '00
29 H*w'97,t4-47.ea
15' 10
15-28 15 '30 15-40
ROOM EXHAUST
15 '50
16 '00
16-10
-------
P 400.8
P
n 350.0
p 380.8
R £58.0
0
P £80.0
A
N 150.0
^ 108.8
50.8
u.o ppn rropan*
270.5 ppn Propane
463.3 ppn Propane
84.04 ppn Propane
282.4
87.9
1
0.1 \ 0.1
16 '28 16*25 16 '30 16:35 16>40
ppn 20 nau'97.16'19'05 ROOM EXHAUST (HH-nn>
550.0 T"^""""™^^^™ "
M0.0
450.0
P 400.0
P
n :-38.0
p 388.8
R £58.0
0
P £88.0
A
N 150.9
F
C 190.0
50.0
0.0
LASCO Panel Products '
Run RE-7-2 17:03 - 18'28
M«an 188.9 ppn Propane
.
KI^L. /X*»»*A_JL ^^/^J'l^^_A~/^\ ./-v~v S**\ "\
-^J ^^~^/^^f^^^^' \^ ^^^f^^ ^ ^~~> \^
17:18 17:28 17:38 17:46 17:58 18:60 18'ie 18:28
ppn 20 Hay '97, 17:01.08 ROOM EXHAUST (HH'MII)
558.8
380.8
458.8
P 499.9
P
n 338.8
p 388.8
R £58.8
0
P £88.8
A
N 150.0
^ 108.8
58.8
0M
.O
PPM
I
LASCO Panel Products
Sgsten Calibration Drift Check
Calibration Cases
9.9 ppn Propane
278.5 ppn Propane
282.4
8.1 1 8.1
18 '34 18 '36 18 '38 18 '48 18'42 18>4
20 Hay '97. 18 '32 '37 ROOM EXHAUST rtt>
-------
p
p
n
P
R
0
P
A
N
E
550.0'
458.8
400.0
330.0
•«0.0
£50.0
£00.0
150.8
188.0
50.0
0.0
1
ppn
i
LfiSCO Panel Products
Run RE-7-3 19 '11 - 20 '35
•
Mean 166.1 PPPI Propane
/^^"
^~>^~^^r> — ,-v_^ **v ^^—r^^^^-^J
9'18 19 '20 19 '30 19'40 19'50 20 '00 20' 10 20 '20 28 '30
20 May'97.19-09'00 ROOM EXHAUST (HH'MM)
P
p
n
P
R
0
P
A
N
E
f«e.e
450.0
400.0
:-se.e
£98.0
150.8
188.0
50.0
0.8
>pn
i
LfiSCO Panel Products
Systen Calibration Drift Check
Calibration Case-s
0.0 PF« Prepare
270.5 Pfm Propane
0.1
280.3
I —
28-42 20 '44 20 '46 £«'48 28 '50 20 '52
20 May '97. £9-40 '09 ROOM EXHAUST (HH'MM)
-------
iSSj
INITIAL CEM CAUBRATION AND PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
Plant: _
Location:
Date:
Parameter: SO2,CO2,O2, NOX£
Monitor: cPprfpor %
Operator: P. :5iE6£
Project #:
Span Value: 100
Chart Scale: _
Pbar, in. Hg.:
Cylinder
#
ANL.1IO
AALIftSli
AL(Y\O2.8lbl
Cal. Gas
Cone.,
o
2.1 0.S
4t».1.3
Sftb-l
Chart Divisions
Direct
Injection
to Monitor
/y. 0
27-3
•
Concentration
Predicted by
Equation,"
Direct System
O.b O.(o
2t^.£> 2bfc.5
4t=S.^ 4Si.b
aftufl &mz
Calibration
Error,""
%of«pafl-
^»A.^>
O.37
0.r>4
Sampling
System
Bias,—
% of Span
A.O
0.3
/,£>
/.7
* Perform linear regression of pretest cal. gas concentration vs. chart divisions to
determine the following equation:
y = mx + b x = ppm y = chart divisions
Por Data Reduction:
Pollutant, ppm/% = (Chart Division - b) =
m
)
Correlation Coefficient =
A
Calculation concentration predicted by equatio using actual chart response
obtained from each calibration gas response.
** Analyzer cal. error, % cal. gas value = (CaL qas conc" ppm'conc- Predicted- PPm> x 100
Cal. gas value, ppm
Acceptable limit = < 2% of calibration gas value (< 5% for THC)
(Direct inject, gas conc. - System inject, gas conc.) x 100
Span value
*** Sampling system bias =
Acceptable limit < 5% of span
Minimum detectable limit = 2% of span or 20 rggrTbr % (circle one)
Rise time to 95% of response for high cal. gas injected through the system
(return to zero after each Injection): s, s, s Average • 27 s
Precision, % scale = difference in chart division response for two repeated
injections of the gas concentrations = - « %
(Clock time B )
-------
3OC3 C33
DAILY CEM CALIBRATION AND PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
Plam:
Parameter: SO2, C02, O2,
Location: MAI
Date: « _ 2
Operator: /&
Project #: J.
Time, Pretest: ^
Run #: M£- 7,
M E.XHPOJL-ST
0-^7
' ^/F&eL-
466. (^^
3-^o Post-test:
1 .ME-7-2.
Monitor: q5gf&Qr%
Span Value: 1 00
Chart Scale: £>-/t&t
Pbar. in. Ha: ?ft.c,
Ambient Temp., F:
5 M/M /roo£Ls)€-
12" S/4:i^
7A*f
Cyl.
#
Cal.Gas
^£onc.,
(ppm>jr%
£>
J-7G.*
4M..1
ML.!
Calibrations (Chart Divisions)
/r'.*?o /A. -2.0 /a/**?
£>. £ o.o o./
21. n ±1.1
4fc.D 4(,.2. 4L2.
AA.X #9.4
Concentration Predicted
3y Equation*
/5.'-Q^> ^:}.o /ff."35 ,
DO Ob / £)
271 1 272. i
^2 / ^/i,4 2 464.2.
&9n.\ 8^ A. 2.
Analyzer
Calibration
Error,"-
% of Soan
^.^O
O .2A
Drift*"
% of Span
1
1
y = chart divisions
* Perform linear regression of pretest cal. gas concentration vs. chart divisions to
determine the following equation:
y = mx + b x = ppm
For Data Reduction:
Pollutant, ppm/% = (Chart Division - b)
m (0.01154
Correlation Coefficient =
' Analyzer cal. error, % cal. gas value = (Cal. gas cone. - cone, predicted) x 100
^ ^*_l .._!.__
Cal. gas value, ppm
Acceptable limit = < 2% of calibration gas value (< 5% for THC)
***
Drift, % Span =
(Post-test cal. response - initial cal. response) x 100
Span value
Acceptable limit < 3% of span
Minimum detectable limit = 2% of span or ppm or % (circle one)
Maximum zero drift = % of span or ppm or % (circle one)
Maximum calibration drift = % of span or ppm or % (drde one)
COMMENTS: Pretest or post-test (drde one) calibration used to quantitate
sample data. Post-test Is used if drift exceeds limits and if post-test
yields higher concentratk
Dons.
-------
OEM DATA REDUCTION - BAG ANALYSIS OR STEADY READINGS
Plant: />f.vr/o Parameter: SO2, CO2l O2, NOx*rffic)CO
Location: yc^7/1/ gy^fj^-r Operator: A ^/^e=:/
Date: *r-yr>-*-7 Project #: .fV/>^.do2>
Po
Run
#
ME -7-1
NE-f-2
i.ntant nrm/o/. _ (Chart Division - b) __ (CD+0.00zs)
m (c.oq^s**-)
Time**
(24-Hr)
I4-.4-1 - 14: S^
- 1 =>•. rfl
-/.^:rt
-/S!2«)
-/^•.•.•v?
-//r/^
-/5s<-7
-/A.Ytf
-/A-V^
/7-^-/7.V^
-/7-'^^
-/7.'.V^
-/7/^3
-/7-'S^
-/^'A-2.
-//9//^
-/^/^
-/&:2.&
Average
Chart
Division
^6 L&
-Z&r^TM.'
t&^&S
Crf b3
7£>
{>&.<>
£>&.&
&Z.O
&L.Z
AL,.0
2>&.0
3«.s
86.0
gL.fS
8L.K
S7.0
SS.D
^.6
Concentration
/P*
£>&*>./
t?e>2>.z
i?e>&.2:
1*33.2.
783.2-
Li&Z.2L.
A63,/
^?2i.A
au'? .0
^t,4.n
S84. 1
/?«*?./
SA4-./
d^^.o
«u4.O
S 74. O
554.0
AS*?.O
Comments
Jam 1
AV6= 724.4 pom Pfnaartf.
Md-AI/.l**, &>f*SI
f
* For NOX Indicate whether NO, NO + N02, or NO2 for specific interval.
**
Indicate whether time interval is from beginning of first time to beginning
of second time or to end of second time (circle one, or describe alternate).
Calculated By:.
Checked By:_
Data:
Date:
-------
~- OEM DATA REDUCTION - BAG ANALYSIS OR STEADY READINGS
Plant:
Parameter: SO2,CO2,O2, NOX*,C
CO
Location: /^/A/ £TvljAIlvr Ooerator: A ^/£&£L-
Date: x-yn-4-? ' Project #: 34O?=> . oaT*
PC
Run
#
M£-7-^
mutant ppm,* - (Chart Division - b) _ (CD+^.oozS) :
m (o. oq:o(
~?-R'fl
"2.o:-2_i
- zo'.-*, i
- 201 2, ^
Average
Chart
Division
£ft
ftA
..t a& "?
Concentration
/3/?/*
884-. 1
SS4. 1
fiA4. 1
^fi.5" i aac? . I
ftj?> <
3~7 S
8^.5
/M,s
57.<
&eg . i
ai^i.l
8*y^,3L
&- gfl"7.5 on^fii
^ixa —
-------
INIT1AL CEM CAUBRATION AND PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
Plant:
Location:
Date:
Parameter: SO2, CO2, O2,
Monitor: (ffprrDor %
Span Value: 100
Operator: _
Project #:
Chart Scale: a -SAO
Pbar, in. Hg.:
Cylinder
#
ALM028W,r
AAl_~7in
AALIfeSlS
Cal. Gas
tt.7
4S.6
Injection
Through
System
o./
/1.7
SS./
13.0
' \
'-
Concentration
Predicted by
Equation,"
Direct System
— -2.4 -2.4
at. i e4 .k
212.4 2^,^
•4ti.A 4Sh.^
Calibration
Error,**
% of Span
d*A^s
,Z.4O
^, r^>
Sampling
System
Bias.*"*
% of Span
/9.0
0.3
f>.h
J.G
* Perform linear regression of pretest cal. gas concentration vs. chart divisions to
determine the following equation:
y = mx + b x = ppm y = chart divisions
For Data Reduction:
Pollutant, ppm/% = (Chart Division - b) = (CD -O.
m
)
Correlation Coefficient =
Calculation concentration predicted by equatio using actual chart response
obtained from each calibration gas response.
*• Analyzer cal. error, % cal. gas value = (Cal. qas cone., ppm - cone, predicted, ppm) x 100
Cal. gas value, ppm
Acceptable limit = < 2% of calibration gas value (< 5% for THC)
*** Sampling system bias =
-------
3 aca
DAILY CEM CALIBRATION AND PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
Plant:
Location:
Date:
Parameter: SO2, CO2, 02,
Monitor: ^-pglgor %
Operator:
Project #: _^
Time, Pretest:
Span Value: 100
Chart Scale: />-//%& MM
Pbar, in. Hq.:
Post-test:
Ambient Temp., P:
Cyl.
#
Cal. Gas
Cone.,
<0j5nrjbr%
-o
fl4.AA
276.S
4^^
Calibrations (Chart Divisions)
/J-'S<9 llv2C> /J9.-35
5. / O-O O.O
n.i /«./
5S./"£i.r> skf)
4.1.0 17.0
Concentration Predicted
By Equation*
/J3 -'5A 1 U '• 1 0 /A '3^>
-2.2 -^.7 -7,7
Bs.n ^77
272.6" ^/??.O ^/.^
4W.B 4*»..«
Analyzer
Calibration
Error,"*
% of Scan
/ ^5
0.' i
Dim*" !
% of Span
* Perform linear regression of pretest cal. gas concentration vs. chart divisions to
determine the following equation:
y *= mx + b x = ppm y = chart divisions
For Data Reduction:
Pollutant, ppm/% = (Cnart Division - b) = (CD -4537)
(<3. ^067-1 )
Correlation Coefficient =
*• Analyzer cal. error, % cal. gas value = (Cal. gas cone. - cone, predicted) x 100
Cal. gas value, ppm
uai. gas va
Acceptable limit = < 2% of calibration gas value (< 5% for THC)
***
Drift, % Span =
(Post-test cal. response - initial cal. response) x 100
Span value
Acceptable limit < 3% of span
Minimum detectable limit» 2% of span or ppm or % (circle one)
Maximum zero drift = % of span or ppm or % (circle one)
Maximum calibration drift - % of span or ppm or % (circle one)
COMMENTS: Pretest or post-test (drde one) calibration used to quantitate
sample data. Post-test is used if drift exceeds limits and if post-test
yields higher concentrations.
-------
aai
CTZJC
p
GEM DATA REDUCTION - BAG ANALYSIS OR STEADY READINGS
Plant:
Location:
Date: 5 - ?r> ,g -,
Parameter: SO2, CO2, Q2. NOx*,Cffl5>CO
Operator: /?
Project #:
Pollutant, ppm/% =
(Chart Division - b) _ (CD -G.S37)
Run
#
RE-l-i
RE-l-Z.
Time**
(24-Hr)
i4-'-49- 41. 55?
- .-s:rfl
-/5:/9
-/^.'i4?
-/^.'^9
-/-;.• -#9
-/.^;<;9
-/4'
~/7-'?^
-/-y.'^-^
-y7.'.-5^
-/*.'/5^
-/&:/*>
~/6 :2?>
-/fi:ie
Average
Chart
Division
2/.<^
2/.0
rt.o
/e.g
2.6.0
ZO.O
/f. ^
2./.O
J4.o
24.0
Z2..0
2/.S
2.I.Z
2.3.5
22.5"
2/.^
2-2.^
2/.D
Concentration
PP"
/£>^.7
/#2.2
<72. 2.
W.7
47.2.
17.Z
72. Z
/01.1.
//7 2.
//7 2.
/07.T-
/0Z. , 2
S04.7
//4.1
/01.1
/A4.-7
/67.2-
/Oi.2-
Comments
^"t^l^V S
M^WApni* tf/yw/KL
PK*. /m.& «M HDOAA
* For NOX Indicate whether NO, NO + N02, or NO2 for specific interval.
** Indicate whether time interval is from beginning of first time to beginning
of second time or to end of second time (circle one, or describe alternate).
Calculated By:.
Checked By:_
Date:.
Date:
-------
OC3
GEM DATA REDUCTION - BAG ANALYSIS OR STEADY READINGS
Plant:
Location:
Date:
Parameter: SO2,
, NOX*C
'CO
Operator: /? , •
Project #:
Pollutant, ppm/% = (Chart Division'b>
m
(CD -p.537)
Run
#
Re-7^
«,
Time**
(24-Hr)
/?•'// -/ /
-iO!i^
Average
Chart
Division
2/.S~
22..C)
2b.O
2d.o
2.0. O
2/,5
2 /, ^-.7
JO 4.7
/22 "2.
/V7 2,
Comments
Tu^n 5
Al/6^- /09,/ oa/rr tfaAu
mua ^ ff r fiffifu
* For NOX Indicate whether NO, NO + NO2, or NO2 for specific interval.
**
Indicate whether time interval is from beginning of first time to beginning
of second time or to end of second time (circle one, or describe alternate).
Calculated-By:
Checked Bv:
Date:
Date:.
-------
APPENDIX A.2.10
Condition 8 Method 25A
-------
LASCO Panel Products
Condition 8 - Main Exhaust
Total Hydrocarbons (THC)
22-May-97
Calibration Gases
0.0 ppm
270.5 ppm
463.3 ppm
886.7 ppm
System Calibration
-0.4
266.9
457.8
881.6
Direct Calibration
-0.4
274.5
465.5
896.9
Correlation 0.9999937
Slope 0.9949005
Intercept -1.5840611
Sampling System Bias
0.00%
0.76%
0.77%
1.53%
Correlation 0.9999895
Slope 1.011169
Intercept -0.524837
Calibration Error
0.55%
0.52%
608.1
7:54-8:46 Run 8-1
'
8:50 Post Cal
Corrected 612.8 ppm THC |
-0.4
465.5
Drift 0.00%
0.77%
9:21-10:53 Run 8-2 | 617.5
Corrected 622.3 ppm THC
Calibration Gases
0.0 ppm
270.5 ppm
463.3 ppm
886.7 ppm
System Calibration
-0.4
266.9
461.6
885.5
Calibration Error
0.70%
0.01%
Correlation 0.9999934
Slope 0.9999279
Intercept -1.6958077
11:40-12:53 Run 8-3 | 666.2
13:03 Post Cal
Corrected 667.9 ppm THC
-0.4
454.0
Drift 0.00%
0.76%
Pagel
-------
p
p 700.0
n
eee.e
R »-•
P 409>0
A 280.0
N
E £88.0
lee.e
0a
• V
Calibration Cases
886.7 ppn
463.3 ppn
270.5 ppn
_!!V5 8.8 ppn . «37.8
274.5 S66.9
-0.4 -8.4
7'18 7:15 7:20 7:25 7:38
ppn 22 May '97. 07 -07 -57 HAIH EXHAUST (HH-MM)
icee.ej
s«e.e
£88.0
P
D 788.8
P
n
eee.e
P
L, ree.e
R
0 400.0
P
A ;ae.e
N
E aee.e
lee. e
8.8
pp«
IcQv* 0
Eee.e
p
p 700.0
n
L see.e
R
0 4ee.e
P
ft :«0.0
N
E £80. e
lee.e
0A
• V
LASCO Panel Products
Run (1E-8-1 7:54 - 8'46
•A ^_L -^S^V A. A /V S\ J\.
t ^J\*ji**J\^^ /^f\ff/v\^f^»^A V^-^v^X^A • ta*w*^V v^^^,/-^
^^ ^^ ^^vw—vN/^Ay ^"*\,x Av-^^^/wv/r
v^s^/~^"^
Mean 608. 1 ppn Propane
7:55 8'80 8:05 8'10 8:15 8:£« 8:25 8'30 8:35 8^40
22 Hay '97. 07- 52- 80 HAIM EXHAUST <"»'"">
LASCO Panel Products
Svsten Calibration Drift Check
Calibration Cases
e.B ppn Propane
463.3 ppn Propane
465.5
(
-e.4 -«.4
• III ^^^^_B
8-52 8-54
22 May'97,68'50'47
8-56 8>58
MAIN EXHAUST
9>ee
9-02
m>
-------
p
p
n
P
R
0
P
N
E
icee.e
LASCO Panel Products
»e.e Run ME-e-2 9=21 - ie-53
£88.8
788.8
taa. e
488.8
288.8
188.8
0.8
ppm
PJ»an 617.5 ppn Propane
9>28 9<38 9'40
22 May'97.89'19'88
9-58
18>80 10' 16
HAIN EXHAUST
18<28
10>38
10'40 10'50
(HH'MM)
P
P
n
P
R
0
P
N
E
£88.
Tea.
«aa.
488.
:aa.
£88.
108.
e.
ppm
0.
e
a
e
e
e
8
e
LASCO
Panel Products
Systen Calibration Drift Check
Calibration Gases
0.8 ppn Propane
463.3
886.7
278.5
3.
ppn Propane
ppn Propane
ppn Propane
5
11 '82
22 May '97
461.6
885.5
266.9
-0.4
11^04 11.06 1P88 IP 10 11.12 IT- 14 11.16 11-18
.11 =01- 16 MAIM EXHAUST (HH-MM)
P
P
n
P
R
J
N
E
1088.8'
=«8.0
£80.0
708.8
£88.8
'
400.0
c*3o« 0 '
a«e.e
188.0
e.e
pp»
LASCO Panel Products E
Run ME-8-3 11 '40 - 12-53
^-\^^v-v^v- y^^-^^vvv^^^
^v ^^^^f^^v^/ ^^^fA^^^^\r^
Mean 666.2 ppn Propane
11 '40 11 '58 12-08 12'10 12 '20 12-S8 12 '40 18>9
32 HaV 97. 11. 38' 80 MA IN EXHAUST (HH'rtl)
-------
p
p
n
p
R
0
P
A
N
E
s«e.e
Eae. e-
788.8
£08.8
MB. 8
480.8
380.0
aee.e
188.8
0A
. o
1
LASCO Panel Products :
Systen Calibration Drift Check
Calibration Cases
0.0 ppn Propane
463.3 ppn Propane
454.8
-0.4
f
-0.4
13'84 13'06
ppn 22 Mav'97.13'03'18
13:08
13-10 13'12
MAIN EXHAUST
13^14 13>16
(HH'MM)
-------
LASCO Panel Products
Condition 8 - Room Exhaust
Total Hydrocarbons (THC)
22-May-97
Calibration Gases
0.0 ppm
84.1 ppm
270.5 ppm
463.3 ppm
System Calibration
0.1
85.8
271.9
462.2
Direct Calibration
0.1
87.9
280.3
474.7
Correlation 0.9999857
Slope 0.9967115
Intercept 1.2023939
Sampling System Bias
0.00%
0.38%
1.53%
2.27%
Correlation 0.9999749
Slope 1.0244207
Intercept 1.2866947
Calibration Error
0.56%
0.69%
7:54-8:46 Run 8-1 |
8:50 Post Cal
185.6
Corrected 185.0 ppm THC |
0.1
267.7
Drift 0.00%
0.76%
9:21-10:53 Run 8-2
Calibration Gases
0.0 ppm
84.1 ppm
270.5 ppm
463.3 ppm
175.5 Corrected 174.9 ppm THC
System Calibration
6.4
92.1
274.0
460.1
Calibration Error
1.99%
0.49%
Correlation 0.999963
Slope 0.9775074
Intercept 8.2790644
11:40-12:53 Run 8-3 | 148 2
13:03 Post Cal
Corrected 143.1 ppm THC
6.4
276.1
Drift 0.00%
0.38%
Pagcl
-------
550.0'
M8.e-
458.8-
P 400.0-
P
n 338.8
p 388.8
R £58.8
0
P £88 8
A
N 158.8
188.8
50.8
0a ,
• V
•
LASCO Panel Products
474>7 r~ 462.2 \
Calibration Cases
£-- ~ ~ ~^.
^^4i3.3 WJ(| \ ^
C 84708l^-^ 'Dft""X(*7 :
280.3 0.0 ppn 271.9
87'9 85.8
I
; 0.1 ^\ |_ 0il
7'10 7=15 7=20 7=25 7=30
ppn 22 May '97. 87 '07 '46 ROOM EXHAUST (HH>rai>
558.8 1 ' '
M0.0
450.0
P 400.0
P
n 330.0
p 380.0
R £50.0
0
P £00.8
A
N 158.8
100.0
50.0
0.0
I
LASCO Panel Products
Run RE-8-1 7=54-8=46
-• '' -..-. . ->.
Mean 185.6 ppn Propane
A I\AA
A / \ ^ \ J\
^*s_* _/^\_« A*. f\f* wx f*. /AA^^^Vy^^^i S \ t V rt 1 \ A -j^ ^*^
^^_j~—s^-'>^' v'^v^wv^/v^v/vw'v^^\xvy^^vyv/ ^ ^w v^-*^\/^
_/— '
7 = 55 8 = 00 8 = 05 8=16 8=15 8 = £.« 8 = 25 8 = 30 8 = 35 8 = 40
ppm 22 May '97. 07 = 52 = 80 ROOM EXHAUST (HH'MM)
558.8' ~~~~
588.8
450.8
P 408.8
P
n 330.0
p 388.8
R £58.8
0
P £98.8
A
-ft 158.8
F
100.0
se.e
0.8
i
LASCO Panel Products
Systen Calibration Drift Cr«ck
Calibration Cases
278. 5 ppn Propane
8.8 ppn Propane
267.7
*~
0.1 | 2.2
ppn
8'52
23 May'97.ee-50-47
8-54
8.56 8-58
ROOM EXHAUST
9'00
9>02
(HH'KM)
-------
p
p
n
P
R
0
P
A
E
508.8
458.8
488.8
C-S8. 8
38B.e
£58.8
£08.8
158.8
188.8
58.8
0.8
ppn
L
LflSCO Panel Products
Run RE-B-2 9-21 - 18-53
Mean 175.5 ppn Propane
Jv^.
*. /VVMw vsVWvV>. A^w. /v
**V_-. .^tm r* "••* w T^ V " \ A I *^ *\ *A f^M ^. K.
*wfr \^ ^^\^\^^^^^.^
^^**frjr
?'£0 9-38 9-48 9-58 18-88 10-18 18-20 10-30 10-40 10-S
22 Hay '97. 89- 19- 88 ROOM EXHAUST (HH'MH)
P
p
n
P
R
0
P
A
458.8
408.8
:-sa.e
:e0.0
£50.0
£88.8
158.8
180. 8
58.8
0.8
ppn
i
LftSCO Panel Products
Systen Calibration Drift Check
Calibration Cases
0.0 ppn Propane
270.5 ppn Propane
463.3 ppn Propane
84.08 ppn Propane
8.5
274.0
460.1
92.1
1
11-02 11-04 11-06 11-08 11-10 11-12 11-14 11-16 11-18 11-20
22 nau'97. n-oi-20 ROOM EXHAUST
P
P
n
P
R
0
P
A
550.0
see.e
450.0
480.0
:-S8.0
388.8
£50.0
£00.0
158.8
100.0
50.8
e.e
LASCO Panel Products
Run RE-8-3 11-48 - 12-53
Mean 148.2 ppn Propane
11-40 11-50
22 May'97.11-38-88
12-00
12-10 12-20
ROOM EXHAUST
12-30
12-40
m>
-------
p
p
n
P
R
0
P
ft
N
E
M8.0-
458.8
488.0
c-50.0
388.8
£58. 8
£B8.8
158.8
108.8
58.8
0.0
ppn
LftSCO Panel Products
Systen Calibration Drift Check
Calibration Casts
0.0 ppn Propane
278.5 ppn Prcpane
6.4
276.1
8.5
13=04 13=06 13=08 13=18 13=12 13=14
22 May '97. 13 = 02 -38 ROOM EXHAUST (HH-MM)
-------
— DAILY GEM CALIBRATION AND PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
Plant:
Location:
Date:
Parameter: SO2, CO2, O2, NOX.'
Monitor:
Operator: p. :
Project #:
Span Value: 100
Chart Scale:
Pbar, in. Hg.: -2.1. so
O- /OC>O aaM firon
IT
Time, Pretest: 7.75 Post-test:
Run #: M£-a-/ .H£-ft-i,_
Ambient Temp., F:
Cyl.
#
<
O
mfil
4b3.}
«*M
Cal. Gas
Cone.,
;2pnjxjr%
-^«
•2-1 . O"
Calibrations (Chart Divisions)
7.y5" ^'.50 i( '.oo
o.o o, I o,[
z-i.o
Concentration Predicted
By Equation*
IMS 4
0. I (
DrHt-*a
% of Span
o.l
6.?>
* Perform linear regression of pretest cal. gas concentration vs. chart divisions to
determine the following equation:
y = mx + b x = ppm y = chart divisions
For Data Reduction:
Pollutant, ppm/% = (Chart Division • b) = (CD-0.0*1)
rv» / ^v <^afi^^ 1 1
m
Correlation Coefficient =
. . . , (Cal. gas cone. - cone, predicted) x 100
Analyzer cat. error, % cal. gas value = * — ;
a Cal. gas value, ppm
Acceptable limit = < 2% of calibration gas value (< 5% for THC)
***
Drift, % Span
(Post-test cal. response - initial cal. response) x 100
Span value
Acceptable limit < 3% of span
Minimum detectable limit = 2% of span or ppm or % (circle one)
Maximum zero drift = % of span or ppm or % (clrde one)
Maximum calibration drift = % of span or ppra or % (circle one)
COMMENTS: Pretest or post-test (clrde one) calibration used to quantitate
~ sample data Post-test Is used If drift exceeds limits and if post-test
yields higher concentratic
-------
jag c~i
DAILY CEM CALIBRATION AND PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
Plant:
Location:
Date:
Operator: c^
Project #:
Time, Pretest:
Run#:
Parameter: SO2, C02,Q2, NOX<
Monitor: cppnffor %
Span Value: 100
Chart Scale: Q -
Pbar, in. Hg.:
-/*
Post-test: iv. os Ambient Temp., F: 70
:hart Divisions) Concentration Predicted
' By Equation*
ll'-OO CV.o^
I ...
i 2.70
2.A
.8
Uto.b 464.^
isaft.o
I
Analyzer
Calibration
Error,"
% of Span
Q./(
O.5P>
Drift,"*
% of Span
o. 1
O.fc,
Perform linear regression of pretest cal. gas concentration vs. chart divisions to
determine the following equation:
y = mx + b x = ppm y = chart divisions
For Data Reduction:
Pollutant ppm/o/- ^ (c"art Division - b) = (CD + o.m )
m
)
Correlation Coefficient =
** Analyzer cal. error, % cal. gas value = (Cal. gas cone. - cone, predicted) x 100
Cal. gas value, ppm
Acceptable limit = < 2% of calibration gas value (< 5% for THC)
***
Drift, % Span = (Post-test cal. response - initial cal. response) x 100
Span value
Acceptable limit < 3% of span
Minimum detectable limit = 2% of span or ppm or % (circle one)
Maximum zero drift = % of span or ppm or % (circle one)
Maximum calibration drift « % of span or ppm or % (cirde one)
COMMENTS: Pretest or post-test (circle one) calibration used to quantitate
sample data. Post-test Is used if drift exceeds limits and if post-test
yields higher concentrator--
aons.
-------
oca era
GEM DATA REDUCTION - BAG ANALYSIS OR STEADY READINGS
Plant: UAvST O Parameter SO?t CO?, Oy, NOy*,CjHC;>CO
_ocation: Nf/MN Ex.Hf>ujsrr Operator: ^ ^/^t^ei—
Date: s-z-z.-qi Project #: S4D& tscfe
Po
Run
KG.- 8- 1
He-a-2.
|utant pcm,o/Q (Chart Division - b) _ (CD -o.o4| )
m (o.o^'il )
ill y /
Time**
(24-Hr)
»7!s4-6'.o4
-ftti^f
-ft'- 24
-8J34
^.Ll-A^l
-q-.4l
-fl!-Sl
-loso/
-IftUI
-/^:i/
-/>.-v/
-/^.'57
Average
Chart
Division
A^ A
bl.^
ko.6
b/.D
S4.Q
S&.o
£f n
1,0.0
67.0
bt». 5
^6.5
Concentration
(c.4^ ,O
1^1^.^
Uftft *
tl3.B
Sb2,.«=>
5*73. 1
S^ft 4
582). (o
57J.5
(^os.fc
(^23^
4*14.7.
b^.Z
bbl.2
Comments
ITuirw ±
^- ul,.ft Q.0^
AN/AS ML .U «n*9r*
ft ^
AC
>J
* For NOX Indicate whether NO, NO + NO2, or NO2 for specific interval.
_ ** Indicate whether time interval is from beginning of first time to beginning
of second time or to end of second time (circle one, or describe alternate).
Calculated Bv:
Checked By:
Date:
Date:
-------
GEM DATA REDUCTION - BAG ANALYSIS OR STEADY READINGS
o
Plant:
Location: HA.M
Date:
Parameter: SO2, CQ2, 62,
5-
Operator: __ fl j^/t.
Project #:
_ (Chart Division - b)
Run
Mf-fi-2,
Time**
(24-Hr)
//•' -/0 - /// <^£>
~/2 : f>O
-/7 : ;n
-/2/2.O
-/2-.30
-sz •• #0
-/2 .'S2>
Average
Chart
Division
ss- <
S£,S
,5V? .O
55, 5"
.-r^ . ^?
Jf^ <
Concentration
^^6.4-
sz^4
Z-ZAS
«•$ 4
£bo4
si*o.4
54*4
Comments
CL
* For NOX Indicate whether NO, NO + NO2, or NO2 for specific interval.
** Indicate whether time interval is from beginning of first time to beginning
of second time or to end of second time (circle one, or describe alternate).
Calculated By:
Checked Bv:
Date:.
Date:
-------
INITIAL CEM CALIBRATION AND PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
Plant:
Location:
Date:
Parameter: SO2, CO2, O2, NOx,Cfficr>
Monitor:
-.3
Chart Divisions
Direct
Injection
to Monitor
o,Q
/»,/
Slo.Z
4S.1
I
Injection
Through
System
o.o
n.l
jS"S.C>
fo.3,
Concentration
Predicted by
Equation,"
Direct System
-2.. l -z.,1
a&.'Z «4.e
nz.*7 2.
-------
3 a a cu
DAILY CEM CALIBRATION AND PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
Piant:
Location:
Date:
Parameter: SO2, C02, O2,
Monitor:
Operator:
Project #:
Time, Pretest: 7:15 Post-test: ir.(
Run #: p.e.-a-i
Span Value: 100
Chan Scale: /?
Pbar, in. Hg.: 2*).
Ambient Temp., F:
Cyl.
#
o
84-08
Z7P-S
n.<^
?>S.O S4.0 55.0
13.*,
Concentration Predicted
By Equation*
7-7^ ^*oo U:OQ
-2.. 5 -1,5 b.^
ftk.~7
271.6 JUvt..^ ^-\(.c>
4bl.?D
Analyzer
Calibration
Error,"
% of Soan
^.IT-
o .?>-7
DrHf**
% of Span
2.00
1. 00
* Perform linear regression of pretest cal. gas concentration vs. chart divisions to
determine the following equation:
y » mx + b
For Data Reduction:
_ (Chart Division - b) _ (CD -0.
m ( 0.70074)
x = ppm y = chart divisions
Pollutant ppm/% =
Correlation Coefficient =
**
Analyzer cal. error, % cal. gas value =
(Cal. gas cone. - cone, predicted) x 100
Cal. gas value, ppm
Acceptable limit = < 2% of calibration gas value (< 5% for THC)
***
Drift, % Span =
(Post-test cal. response - initial cal. response) x 100
Span value
Acceptable limit < 3% of span
Minimum detectable limit = 2% of span or ppm or % (circle one)
Maximum zero drift » % of span or ppm or % (circle one)
Maximum calibration drift = % of span or ppm or % (circle one)
COMMENTS: Pretest or post-test (clrde one) calibration used to quantitate
sample data. Post-test Is used If drift exceeds limits and If post-test
yields higher concentrations.
-------
DAILY GEM CALIBRATION AND PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
Plant:
Location: -ROO»A E.*>^u.
Date:
Parameter: SO2,
Monitor: r%
Operator:
Project #:
Time, Pretest: \\IQO Post-test:
Run#:
Span Value: 100
Chart Scale: _&
Pbar, in. Hg.:_
Ambient Temp., F: 70 °F
Cyl.
#
Cat. Gas
Cone.,
O
84. ofi
270.5
4fe3.3>
Calibrations (Chart Divisions)
J/:t>D S3 :of
/,7 1.1
/1.0
SS.O 553
13.1
Concentration Predicted
By Equation"
//•'OO f}:o£
-/. k -/. (,
8b,4
2tft.t> 214. 7,
4^4
\
Analyzer
Calibration
Error,"
% of Span
2. It
O.^^j
DrHl—
% of Span
o.o
D.I
* Perform linear regression of pretest cal. gas concentration vs. chart divisions to
determine the following equation:
y « mx + b x = ppm y = chart divisions
For Data Reduction:
Pollutant ppm/% = (Chart Division - b) = (CD- 2.**)
m
Correlation Coefficient =
-------
GEM DATA REDUCTION - BAG ANALYSIS OR STEADY READINGS
Plant: '
Location: R00.&
/bl,.*)
/Sb.1
/44.4
/St>. npmrrof*
j=_sa LJi ,jj|fi „ p-
telc*^/74.l> **« fron*.
* For NOX Indicate whether NO, NO + NO^, or NO2 for specific interval.
**
Indicate whether time interval is from beginning of first time to beginning
of second time or to end of second time (circle one, or describe alternate).
Calculated-By:
Checked Bv;
Date:.
Date:
-------
GEM DATA REDUCTION - BAG ANALYSIS OR STEADY READINGS
o
Plant:
Location:
Date: ^.2.-z.-g-r
Parameter: SO2, CO2, O2, NOX*(JHJ) CO
Operator: P.
Project #:
Pollutant, ppm/% =
(Chart Division - b) _ (CD-z.oofe)
m
)
Run
#
M£-«-^
Time**
(24-Hr)
H'40 - ll!«>0
-lz.:oo
-J2.1 10
-/2./2A
- /.2 .'.3
2&&
Concentration
/>/>">
/£O.O
/4s.o
/42.4
7+2.1-
S^7.5
/47.S
732.2-
Comments
3vx3 ff~ Proft*
* For NOX Indicate whether NO, NO + NO2, or NO2 for specific interval.
** Indicate whether time interval is from beginning of first time to beginning
of second time or to end of second time (circle one, or describe alternate).
Calculated By:
Checked By:
Z^,^/ Date:.
Date:
-------
APPENDIX A.2.11
Condition 9 and 10 Method 25 A
-------
LASCO Panel Products
Condition 9 - Main Exhaust
Total Hydrocarbons (THC)
22-May-97
Calibration Gases
0.0 ppm
270.5 ppm
463.3 ppm
886.7 ppm
System Calibration
-4.2
263.1
450.2
870.2
Calibration Error
0.36%
0.43%
Correlation 0.9999934
Slope 0.9856057
Intercept -4.4685045
17:45
Post.Cal
-0.4
450.2
Drift
0.38%
0.00%
596.1
18:04-18:50 Run 9-1
L_
18:53 PostCal
Corrected 609.3 ppm THC |
-0.4
438.7
Drift 0.38%
1.15%
Pawl
-------
p
p
H
P
R
0
P
A
E
p
H
p
f
0
P
A
N
E
700.0
600.8
408.8
288.8
£08. 8
100.0
0a
• D
886.7 ppn
463.3 ppn
270.5 ppn
0.8 ppn
^
458.2 1
1
263. 1 j
• v_
-4.2
16'32 16'34 16-36 16-38
ppm 32 nav '97, 16 -31 -25 MAIN EXHAUST
1W0.0 '
£80.0
700.0
680.0
M0.0
408.8
J80.0
£88.8
180.0
0.0
LflSCO Panel Products
Systen Calibration Drift Check
Calibration Caz«s
463.3 ppn
0.8 ppn
450.2
f \
16-40 16-42
I
-0.4
17-46 17:47 17-48 17:49 17:50 17:51 17:52 17:53 17:54 17:55
P
P
ri
p
R
0
P
A
N
E
ppm 22 naw '97. l7-45< 34 MAIN EXHAUST
1W8.0
£80.0
788.8
eaa.e
ffga a
*
488.8
:<38.e
£88.8
188.8
0.0
LftSCO Panel Products
Run ME-9-1 18-84 - 18-58
Mean 596.1 ppn Prcpane
'-sy^/V~N*»'*^J/^^~v~^/<>^^*vXv/^^^\ /«y\-/'~1"^^"A'*^w*^-"
\s**
(HH'MM)
1
tf^-nj*^ *S. .. ^.
•~V^y^W>^vN/>-<^ ^"V^.
18-05 18- 10 18-15 18-28 18*85 18-38 18*35 18 '48 18'45 18-58
ppn 22M.v'97.i8.04.ee MAIN EXHAUST «*•««>
-------
p
p
n
p
R
0
p
A
N
E
we.e
688.0'
Tea. e
taa.e
M8.8
408.8
;ae.e
£«8.8
lea.e
e. a
ppm
i
LflSCO Panel Products
SysUn Calibration Drift Check
Calibration Gases
463.3 Fpn
8.8 M>n
438.7
r \
-8.4
^-M_^^^_
18 '54 18 '55 18-56 18 '57 18 '58 18-59 19'08 19'01 19'8c
ZZ May '97. 18 '53 -48 MAIN EXHAUST (HH'IW)
-------
LASCO Panel Products
Condition 9 - Room Exhaust
Total Hydrocarbons (THC)
22-May-97
Calibration Gases
0.0 ppm
84.1 ppm
270.5 ppm
463.3 ppm
System Calibration
-0.2
85.7
272.8
463.7
Calibration Error
0.81%
0.45%
Correlation 0.9999852
Slope 1.0007933
Intercept 0.8678023
17:45
PostCal
-0.2
274.7
Drift
0.00%
0.38%
80.1
18:04-18:50 Run 9-1
'
18:52 PostCal
Correcte'j 79.2 ppm THC |
-0.2
276.6
Drift 0.00%
0.76%
Page 1
-------
p
N
p
R
0
P
A
N
E
450.8
488.8
c-se.e
188.0
£20.0
£88.8
150.0
180.8
50.0
8.0
|
LASCO Panel Products
463.7 1 Svsten Calibration Drift Check
1 Calibration Cases
1 463.3 ppn
I 270.5 ppn
I 84.08 ppn
272.8
j
83.7 \
\_ -0.2
16-32 16'34 16-36 16<38 16 '49 16-42
ppn 22 nav/97,16'31'18 ROOM EXHAUST (HH-nn)
P
p
II
p
R
0
P
A
N
E
450.8
480.0
:-s0.0
3C0.8
£50.0
£88.8
150.0
108.0
58.0
0.8
I
LASCO Panel Products
Systen Calibration Drift Check
Calibration Cases
0.0 ppn
870.5 ppn
274.7
-0.2
r |
1 -0.2
ppn
17'46 17'47
22 May'97.17<45'17
17'48
17'49 17-58 17-51
ROOM EXHAUST
17'53 17'54 17'55
P
p
n
p
R
0
P
A
N
E
450.8
400.0
350.0
380. 8
£•50.0
£80.0
150.0
100.0
50.0
e.e
PPM
1
LASCO Panel Products
Run RE-9-1 18-04 - 18-50
Mean 80.1 ppn Propane
-^./—Vj^v. ^__ ^-^^v^_^
^— -^_s~
18-05 18-10 18-15 18-20 18-25 18-30 18-35 18-40 18-45 18'50
23 HW97.18-04.00 ROOM EXHAUST (HH'HH)
-------
p
p
n
p
R
o
p
A
N
E
450.0-
499.8
C-S0.0
380.0
£50.0'
c«0.0
150.0
100.0
50.0
0.0
I
LASCO Panel Products
Systen Calibration Drift Check
Calibration Cases
0.0 ppn
270.5 ppn
1
276.6
\
-0.2 /
ppn
18'53 18'54
22 May'97.18^52'15
18:55
18'56 18'57 18-58
ROOM EXHAUST
18'59
19<60
19-01 19-92
(HHiMM)
-------
LASCO Panel Products
Condition 10 - Main Exhaust
Total Hydrocarbons (THC)
22-May-97
Calibration Gases
0.0 ppm
270.5 ppm
463.3 ppm
886.7 ppm
System Calibration
-4.2
263.1
450.2
870.2
Calibration Error
0.36%
0.43%
Correlation 0.9999934
Slope 0.9856057
Intercept -4.4685045
17:45
18:53
Post Cal
Post Cal
-0.4
450.2
-0.4
438.7
Drift
0.38%
0.00%
Drift 0.38%
1.15%
19:35-20:57 Run 10-11 587.8
21:03 Post Cal
Corrected 600.9 ppm THC |
-0.4
454.0
Drift 0.38%
0.38%
Pagel
-------
P
p
M
P
R
0
P
to
N
E
S«0.e-
£80.0
700.0
£88.8
SB8.8
408.8
188. 8
8.8
LfiSCQ Panel Products
Systen Calibration
878.2
Calibration Cases . i
886.7 ppn
463.3 ppn
278.5 ppn
0.8 ppn
458.2 }
263. 1 1
1 ~
ppn
16-32 16-34
22 May'97,16-31-25
16-36 16-38
HAIN EXHAUST
16-40
16-42
(HH-MM)
P
M
P
R
0
P
A
N
E
W0.0-
£80.0
708.0
€88.0
?«8.8
488.8
380.0
£80.0
108.8
0.8
I
LflSCO Panel Products
System Calibration Drift Check
Calibration Gai«s
463.3 ppn
0.8 ppn
458.2
f \
[
17-46 17-47 17-48 17-49 17-50 17-51 17-52 17-53 17-54 17-55
ppn 22 Mav'97. 17-45-34 MAIN EXHAUST (HH-MM)
-------
p
p 700.0'
N
688.0
R M0'0
jj 480.0
A 280.0
N
E £00.0
100.0
0.0
ppn
1W0.0-
=«0.0
£80.0
P
p 709.0
M
£00.0
R M8'e
0 408.0
p
A -no 0
M
E £88.0
100.0
0.0
ppn
ieee.0
900.0
€88.0
P
p 790.0
" «M».o
p
R -OTWL «*\_
/,.^wv /^VXV\.,*-"^*^X*~.
^^^^r-S^^^^
nean 565.7 ppn nean 573.9 ppn Mean 625.4 ppn
19-35 - 19-59 19-59 - £0-31 20-31 - £0-57
19-48 19-50 20<00 £0-18
22 Maw '97, 19 -35 -00 MAIN
LASCO Panel Products
Swsten Calibration Drift Check
Calibration Gases
463.3 ppn
0.0 ppn
/
/
„ |
21 '04 21-6S 21 '06 21 >07
22 Hag '97, 21- 03 '49 MAIN
20-20 20-30 20 '48 28 -M
EXHAUST (HH-MM)
1
454. 0
I
21 '08 21-09 21 >10 21 ' 11
EXHAUST ni>
-------
LASCO Panel Products
Condition 10 - Room Exhaust
Total Hydrocarbons (THC)
22-May-97
Calibration Gases
0.0 ppm
84.1 ppm
270.5 ppm
463.3 ppm
System Calibration •
-0.2
85.7
272.8
463.7
Calibration Error
0.81%
0.45%
Correlation 0.9999852
Slope 1.0007933
Intercept 0.8678023
17:45
18:52
Post Cal
Post Cal
19:35-20:57 Run 10-1| 67.0
21:00 Post Cal
-0.2
274.7
-0.2
276.6
Drift
0.00%
0.38%
Drift 0.00%
0.76%
Corrected 66.1 ppm THC
-0.2
272.8
Drift 0.00%
0.00%
Pagel
-------
p
R
0
P
A
H
E
P
P
M
P
R
P
A
N
•E
458.8
488.8
3S8.8
:ae.e
£58.8
£98.8
158.8
188. 8
58.8
8.8
ppm
768.8'
458. 8
488.8
c-se.e-
M8.8-
^
c'sa.e
£88.8
158.8
188.8
I
LASCO Panel Products
' 463.7 | Systen Calibration Drift Check
1 Calibration Gases
I
1 463.3 ppn
\ 278.5 ppn
I
I 84.88 ppn
272.8
'
85.7 \
-8.2
16-32 16-34 16-36 16'38 16-48 16-48
22 Hav'97. 16-31- 18 ROOM EXHAUST
t
UfiSCO Panel Products
Systen Calibration Drift Check
Calibration Cases
8.8 ppn
278.5 ppn
274.7
r i
i
-------
P
p
p
R
0
P
A
N
E
450.0-
408.8-
358.8
£50.0
£90.0
150.0
108.8
58.0
0.8
jpm
L
LASCO Panel Products
Systen Calibration Drift Check
Calibration Cases
8.8 ppn
270.5 ppn
-0.2 /
276.6
\
,
-8.2 /
18-53 18-54 18-55 18=56 18'57 18'58 18-59 19-00 19-01 19-02
22 Ma«'97, 18 52-15 ROOM EXHAUST (HH'MM)
P
P
n
p
R
0
p
A
M
E
M0.0-
450.0
400.0
358.8
380.0
cSe.8
'«B 8
158.8
188.8
50.0
0.0
ppm
: L
LASCO Panel Products
*Run RE-18M . <19V35- 20-57
Mean 67.8 ppn Propane
Mean 70.4 ppn Mean 63.0 ppn rtean 68.8 ppn
19'35 - 19-59 19'59 - 20'31 28-31 - 28-57
~'~^~----~^^
19 '40 19 '50 20100 S0> 10 20-20 28-30 20 '40 28-£6
22 May '97. 19 35-80 ROOM EXHAUST (HH'MM)
P
p
n
p
R
o
p
A
N
E
M0.8'
450.0
400.0
3S0.8
380.0
£58.0
c«0.0
150.8
100.0
50.0
0.0
1
LASCO Panel Products
Systen Calibration Drift Check
Calibration Cases
0.8 cpn
a__ _ 273.8
270.5 PPR
-0.2
ppn
21-81 21-02 21-83 El-84 21-85 21-06 21-07 21'08 £1-09 21-10
22 Hw'97,21-00-16 ROOM EXHAUST (HH-rtl)
-------
INITIAL CEM CALIBRATION AND PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
Plant:
Location: js
Date: 5-22 -
Operator: _
Project #:
Parameter: SO2, COg, O2, Ng^TTHC
Monitor: c^pm3or %
Span Value: 100
Chart Scale: _
Pbar, in. Hg.:
. so
Cylinder
#
AAU110
^ A. L. 18 515
M-molftlU
Cal. Gas
Cone.,
O
no. s
4fc>2>.3,
gftt.l
Chart Divisions
Direct
Injection
to Monitor
o.o
27.2.
-44,. a
30.0
Injection
Through
System
o.o
7.7. 0
4fe.O
as. i
Concentration
Predicted by
Equation,"
Direct System
l.M- 1.4
it, 1.7. Ibl/i
4fa2..2. 4^*4-. 4
ftAT.Io «fe,ft.^
Calibration
Error,"*
% of-Gpsrr
&A*>
d,-*e>
n.Z-4
Sampling
System
Bias,"**
% of Span
0,0
0.2.
£>,&
/.
-------
3 BC3 r—>
DAILY CEM CALIBRATION AND PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
Plant:
Location: MAIM EXHA.VAAT
Date: s-2.-z.-q7
Parameter: SO2, C02, 02,
Monitor:
Operator:
Project #:
Time, Pretest: /&:3Q Post-test:
Run*
Span Value: 100
Chart Scale: O-/OOQ
Pbar, in. Hg.:
Ambient Temp., F:
. za
Cyl.
*
Cal.Gas
Cone.,
fJ?Jn5>or%
O
Z70.-S
^4,3.3,
5ft^.7
Calibrations (Chart Divisions}
/6'3 *t*f3,4 -O.li
&&e.s
Analyzer
Calibration
Error,""
% of Span
O 52.
e? S&
Drift*-
% of Span
0. /
/./
* Perform linear regression of pretest cai. gas concentration vs. chart divisions to
determine the following equation:
y - mx + b x = ppm y = chart divisions
For Data Reduction:
Pollutant, ppm/% * (Chart Division - b) = (CD
m
Correlation Coefficient =
**
Analyzer cal. error, % cal. gas value
(Cal. gas cone. - cone, predicted) x 100
Cal. gas value, ppm
Acceptable limit = < 2% of calibration gas value (< 5% for THC)
***
Drift, % Span =
(Post-test cal. response - initial cal. response) x 100
Span value
Acceptable limit < 3% of span
Minimum detectable limit = 2% of span or ppm or % (circle one)
Maximum zero drift = % of span or ppm or % (circle one)
Maximum calibration drift - % of span or ppm or % (circle one)
COMMENTS: Pretest or post-test (circle one) calibration used to quantitate
sample data. Post-test Is used if drift exceeds limits and if post-test
yields higher concentrate
-------
GEM DATA REDUCTION - BAG ANALYSIS OR STEADY READINGS
Plant: L\
Location: |H
Date: =;
Parameter: SO2, C02, O2, NOy^^S^, CO
Operator: p. *
Project #:
Pollutant, ppm/% = (Chart Division - b) =
m
Run
Time**
(24-Hr)
Average
Chart
Division
Concentration
Comments
LO.Q
HE-ID-I
ss.o
68 .o
, 5
M
-------
3 a a eg
DAILY CEM CALIBRATION AND PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
Plant: _
Location:
Data:
Parameter:
Monitor:
, C02,02,
Operator: P. . ^
Time, Pretest:
Run #
Span Value: 100
Chart Scale:
Pbar, in.
Post-test:
Ambient Temp., F: 70 "F
Cyl.
#
Cal. Gas
Cone.,
270. £
4A3A
Calibrations (Chart Divisions}
/fo;_3o n:*i$ /%:<$ 1.1 :co
a.o />iO o.o /), Q
/7.7
$$>?. «.i 5<.^ ^r
DrHf*
% of Span
o.o
£>.8
* Perform linear regression of pretest cal. gas concentration vs. chart divisions to
determine the following equation:
y — mx + b x = ppm y = chart divisions
For Data Reduction:
Pollutant, ppm/% = (Cnart Division - b) =
m
(0.2.02.05 )
Correlation Coefficient =
'Analyzer cal. error, % cal. gas value = (Cal. gas cone. - cone, predicted) x 100
Cal. gas value, ppm
Acceptable limit = < 2% of calibration gas value (< 5% for THC)
***
Drift, % Span
(Post-test cal. response - initial cal. response) x 100
Span value
Acceptable limit < 3% of span
Minimum detectable limit = 2% of span or ppm or % (circle one)
Maximum zero drift = % of span or ppm or % (circle one)
Maximum calibration drift - % of span or ppm or % (circle one)
COMMENTS: Pretest or post-test (circle one) calibration used to quantitate
sample data. Post-test Is used if drift exceeds limits and if post-test
yields higher concentrations.
-------
GEM DATA REDUCTION - BAG ANALYSIS OR STEADY READINGS
Plant: L-k Parameter: SO2) CO2l O2, NOxdHCpC
Location: "R^e,^ £!*.V*PVUL*
Po
Run
#
RE-«-l
M£-iO-l
m-tontpp^- (Chart Division - b) _ (CD -*.3b3)
m (0.20-z.oS )
Time**
(24-Hr)
/*.V>V-/a//4'
-/S.'if
-/B.'34
-I6i44
~/&:so
9/35 - /«?.' V5"
-/f.'s-^
-&:*<)
/4>'S4 -ID: 01
-lot 11
-•LO'.-tf
-i.o:3fl
-1A!4^
-•2.0! SI
(4e>:s4 A»^l
Average
Chart
Division
/».<
/k.S
/£.£•
/L.X
Af.Z
/£.o
/4.<
H. o
S2.Q
/3.0
M.S
M.O
/S.d
/s:o
'v'=> -rirv\e^
/ r^
Concentration
/>/**»
&, e>
13.1
71. :3/ S.A*~*jt-
, i
A f£S{ T° A.«.cO
rt*^-v>
P
A\/67= b(e>.^ /y»/» /^S
// /
-------
APPENDIX A.2.12
Condition 11 Method 25A
-------
LASCO Panel Products
Condition 11 - Main Exhaust
Total Hydrocarbons (THC)
23-May-97
Calibration Gases
0.0 ppm
270.5 ppm
463.3 ppm
886.7 ppm
System Calibration
-4.2
270.7
461.6
889.3
Direct Calibration
-4.2
274.5
469.3
908.4
Correlation 0.9999932
Slope 1.0067724
Intercept -3.5186578
Sampling System Bias
0.00%
0.38%
0.77%
1.91%
Correlation 0.9999901
Slope 1.0286487
Intercept -4.731321
Calibration Error
0.35%
0.53%
Calibration Gases
0.0 ppm
270.5 ppm
463.3 ppm
886.7 ppm
System Calibration
-0.4
270.7
465.5
896.9
Calibration Error
0.43%
0.33%
Correlation 0.999991
Slope 1.0123942
Intercept -1.9711902
09:12-10:12 Run11-1| 552.3
Corrected 547.5 ppm THC |
Calibration Gases
0.0 ppm
270.5 ppm
463.3 ppm
886.7 ppm
System Calibration
-0.4
270.7
465.5
893.1
Calibration Error
0.30%
0.08%
Correlation 0.9999982
Slope 1.0080115
Intercept -1.1456555
10:38-11:19 Run 11-21 561.6
11:29 PostCal
Corrected 558.3 ppm THC |
-0.4
461.6
Drift 0.00%
0.39%
12:01-12:42 Run 11 -3| 56^5
12:48 PostCal
Corrected 561.2 ppm THC |
3.5
454.0
Drift 0.39%
1.15%
-------
p
p
N
P
R
0
P
A
N
E
£88.8
780.0
£00.0
~Q0.0
480.0
C00.0
100.0
0.0
ppn
LASCO
988.4
Panel Products
Direct us. Systen Calibrations
Calibration Gases
469.3
886.7
463.3
270.5
0.0
274.5
7<08 7'18 7'IS
S3 May '97, 07 ' 07 < 31
ppn Propane
ppn Propane
ppn Propane
ppn Propane
-4.2
889.3
I
461.6
270.7
-4.2
7<14 7 >16 7 '18 7 '20 7 '22 7 '24 7 '26 7 '28
MAIM EXHAUST
P
P
n
p
R
o
p
A
N
E
•
'
680.0
700.0
£00.0
.00.0
400.0
G88.8
280.0
100.0
0.0
i
LftSCO Panel Products
Styrene Calibrations fron t'rie' Cylinder Standards
1 l
P, 2:0.7 ppn Styrene
1
143.1 FPn Styrene j \^- •— f~~ 383.3 ^
/ 297.5
^ ' 247.8 V
J
7'38 7'32 7^34 7'36 7'38 7'40
ppn 23 May'97. 07- 29-87 MAIN EXHAUST (HH-rwi)
P
p
n
p
R
o
p
A
N
E
900.0 •
£80.8
700.0
£«0.0
TO0.8
400.0
280.0
100.0
0a
. 50
S3 nw'97.ee>48>80
8-52
8-54 8'36
MAIM EXHAUST
8-58
9>es
-------
p
1
p
n
p
R
0
p
A
N
E
P
P
n
P
R
0
P
A
N
E
P
P
H
R
0
P
A
_H
E
seo.o
689.0
700.0
£80.0
780.0
400.0
380.0
£80.0
100.0
0.0
LftSCO Panel Products
Run ME-11-1 9-12 -
rv~^ "\^ v*-s_~~>
9-20
ppn 23 May '97, 09- 12-00
1380.0 |
S«0.0
680.0
788.8
£88.0
780.0
400.0
380.0
£80.0
100.0
0a
• 0
LftSCO Panel Products
Susten Calibration ar
Calibration Cases
463.3 ppn
886.7 ppn
270.5 ppn
0.0 ppn
/
I
10-12
dean 552.3 ppn Propane
**/W^~»-*-vWS^~_ V^^-V. J^f-*-^-^.
~^^*-^ >^>— — ^-~~*r- ^^
9i30 9:40 9-50 10-00 10-10
MAIN EXHAUST
''
id Drift Check r~ ' i
893.1
465.5
•1
1 . 1
-0.4
18-18 10-20
ppn 23 riav'97. 18- 17-39
ieee.0
988.8
680.9
780.0
£80.0
788.0
400.0
380.0
£88.8
100.0
LASCO Panel Products
Run HE-11-2 10 '38
^ft*. ^^i_oi~>
f~i** '^ V^^^-^^
10-40 10-45
ppn 23 MM '97.18- 38-88
10-22 10-24 10-26 10-28
MAIN EXHAUST
i
-11-19
Mean 561.6 ppn Propane
^ff\^ ^~f*~^*~- >_A-^. /^\
.\_ -«— <~^r~ -^J^*f—^ ^**- "*~
10-59 18-55 11-00 Ili85 11*18 11-15
HA IN EXHAUST m>
-------
p
p
n
p
R
0
p
A
N
E
P
P
ri
p
R
0
p
A
N
E
P
P
n
p
R
0
p
A
N
E
S«8.0
£88.8
780.8
€«0.0
408.0
:80.8
£90.0
108.8
8.8
11 =
ppn
i.eeo.'o
s«8.e
£80.0
788.8
fflo.o
480.8
"80.0
£«0.e
180.8
8.0
ppn
S«0.0
£80.0
700.0
£60.0
400.0
300.0
£00.0
100.0
0.0
ppn
LASCO Panel Products
Systen Calibration Drift
Calibration Gases
0.8 ppn
463.3 ppn
f
-8.4
1
Check
461.6
Y ~8-4
39 11=38 11=31 11=33 11=33 11=34 11=35 11=36 11=37 11=38 11-39
=3 May '97. 11 =39 = 88 MAIN EXHAUST
LftSCO Panel Products
Run ME-11-3 13=81 - 13
^ ^
12=05 12=10
33 May '97, 12=01 =80
LflSCO Panel Products
Systen Calibration Drift
Calibration Gases
0.0 ppn
463.3 ppn
-0.4
12-49 13-58 12-51
23 M«V '97. 12-48 < 46
I
42
dean 564.5 ppn Propane
'^~^-^~*-~*^^~~S~^ s>~r*~^^ ~. ^^^ — _
12=15 13=38 13=35 12=30 12=35 12-40
MAIN EXHAUST
i
Check
454.0
1 \
\ «
12-52 12-53 12-54 12-55 12-56 12=57 12-58
MAIN EXHAUST
-------
LASCO Panel Products
Condition 11 - Room Exhaust
Total Hydrocarbons (THC)
23-May-97
Calibration Gases
0.0 ppm
84.1 ppm
270.5 ppm
463.3 ppm
System Calibration
-0.2
83.8
269.0
458.0
Direct Calibration
-0.2
85.7
276.6
471.4
Correlation 0.9999922
Slope 0.9890624
Intercept 0.4164193
Sampling System Bias
0.00%
0.38%
1.52%
2.68%
Correlation 0.9999947
Slope 1.0183712
Intercept 0.1486426
Calibration Error
0.09%
0.36%
Calibration Gases
0.0 ppm
84.1 ppm
270.5 ppm
463.3 ppm
System Calibration
-0.2
85.7
269.0
456.1
Calibration Error
1.75%
0.53%
Correlation 0.999966
Slope 0.9834181
Intercept 1.5705042
09:12-10:12 Run11-1| 115.9
Corrected 116.3 ppm THC |
Calibration Gases
0.0 ppm
84.1 ppm
270.5 ppm
463.3 ppm
System Calibration
1.7
87.6
276.6
467.5
Calibration Error
0.38%
0.68%
Correlation 0.9999773
Slope 1.0056284
Intercept 2.7291519
10:38-11:19 Run11-2| 98.5
11:24 PostCal
Corrected 95.2 ppm THC
1.7
270.9
Drift 0.00%
1.14%
12:01-12:42 Run 11-3| 91.4
12:49 PostCal
Corrected 88.2 ppm THC |
-0.2
278.5
Drift 0.38%
0.38%
Pagel
-------
p
p
n
p
R
o
p
A
N
E
450.8
400.0
350.0
£50.0
£00.0
150.0
180.8
50.0
0.0
471.4
LASCO Panel Products
Direct vs. Systen Calibrations
Calibration Gases
463.3 ppn
270.5 ppn
84.08 ppn
276.6
8.0 ppn
85.7
-8.2
458.0
I
269.0
83.8 \
-0.3
P
P
N
p
R
0
p
A
N
E
7.08 7:18 7 '12 7 U4 7^16 7 '18 7 '28 7<22 7 '24 7<26 7. 28
ppn 23 Maw'97,07.07.44 ROOM EXHAUST (HH-MII)
45,0.0 •
"•' . V;
400.0-
:so. e
280.0 •
£50.0
150.0
100.0
50.0
0.0
i
LASCO Panel Products
Calibration of the Styrene Cylinder Standards
•'-• 250.7 ppn Sty rsne
n
r
143.1 ppn Styrene ( 1
1
102 ppn Styrene f 295.7 |
' v y
r 246.1 |
.
1
7.44 7' 46 7>48 7'50 7^52 7<54 7<56
ppn 23 May'97,07'44'80 ROOM EXHAUST nn>
P
P
n
p
R
0
p
A
M
E
458.8-
480.0-
350.8
380.8
£30.8
£88.8
150.8
100.8
58.8
8.8
LASCO Panel Products
Systen Drift Check
and Calibration
456.1
269.8
Calibration Gases
8.8 ppn
278.5 ppn
463.3 ppn
84.08 ppn
^
85.7
— a o
-8.2
8'46 8'48
ppn 33 May'97.C8-46-80
8S4
ROOM EXHAUST
8'56
8'58
9-80
-------
p
p
N
P
R
0
P
A
N
E
u»a. e
450.0'
408.8-
358.0
:8e.e
£50.0
158.8
108.8
58.8
0.8
ppn
t
LftSCO Panel Products
Run RE-11-1 9-12 - 18' 12
Mean 115.9 ppn Propane
v^™~X^ ^^^
9'28 9-30 9-40 9-50 10-80 18-18
23 May '97, 89 -12 '88 ROOM EXHAUST (HH-fUl)
P
p
n
p
R
o
p
A
N
E
458.0
400.0
350.8
'88
* '
£38.8'
£88.8
130.0
100.0
58.8
0A
. 0
I
LfiSCO Panel Products
Systen Calibration Drift Check
Calibration Gases
0.0 ppn
270. 5 ppn
463.3 ppm
84.08 ppn
1.7
467.5
276.6
87.6 \
\
1.7
P
P
n
p
R
0
p
A
N
E
ppm <
430.0
488.8
C-S0.0
388.8
£58.8
£38.0
138. 8
188.8
38.8
e.e
DQH
IM'IB 10<20 10>22 10-24 10:26 10 '£8
!3 Hag '97. 18 '16. 88 ROOM EXHAUST (HH'MM)
IftSCO Panel Products
Run RE-11-2 18'38 - 11-19
Mean 98.5 ppn Propane
^ " ~~ ~^~
10'40 10-45 18*58 10 '33 11-00 11-83 11-X0 11'13
23HW97.t8'38'88 , ROOM EXHAUST (HH'HH>
-------
p
p
M
P
R
0
P
A
N
E
P
P
n
p
R
0
p
N
E
P
P
n
p
R
0
p
A
N
-E
2SO.O
£50.0
•*rta a
150.0
100.0
50.0
0.0
ppn 2
450.0
400.0
350.0
280.0
£50.0
£80.0
150.0
100.0
50.0
9.0
ppn
450.0
400.0
£50.0
150.0
100.0
50.0
0.0
ppn
Calibration Cases
0.0 ppn
270.5 ppn
270.9
1.7 ] I'7
1 1 ' 26 1 1 - 28 1 1 ' 30 11 - 32 1 1 - 34 1 1 - 36 1 1 ' 38 1 1 ' 40
>3 May'97.11-24'52 ROOM EXHAUST (HH'MM)
li
LfiSCO Panel Products
Run RE-11-3 12-01 - 12-42
Mean 91.4 ppn P ropane
-—^.^—-v^^^^^,^^ ^^ ^ -~N^~^X~~-\ • ^~
12-05 12-10 12-15 12-20 12-25 12-38 12-35 12-46
23 Hay '97, 12 -01 '86 ROOM EXHAUST (HH'MII)
t
LASCO Panel Products
Systen Calibration Drift Check
Calibration Gases
O.O ppn
278.5 ppn
278.5
-o.a \^
12 '50 12'51 12 '52 12 '53 12 '54 12-55 12 '56 12 '57
23 May '97, 12'49' 12 ROOM EXHAUST HM>
-------
p
p
M
P
R
0
P
A
N
E
458.6
498.0
3S8.0
:0e.e
25*. *
£68.0
150.0
108.0
50.0
0.8
L&SCQ Panel Products
469.6 1
I
Direct Calibration
1 Calibration Gases
1
374.7
463.3 ppn Propane
270.5 ppn Propane
84.08 ppn Propane
0.8 ppn Propane
83.7 \
\ -e.e
ppn
7:36 7 • 37 7 - 38
33 May "37,07:35<23
7:3-9
7'40 7'41 7'42
AUXILIARY FAN
7'43
7:44 7'.45 7'46
(HH'MM)
P
p
n
p
R
o
p
A
N
E
450.9
400.0
C-50.0
:80.0
£50.8
150.0
108.8
58. 8
e.e
8
I
LflSCO Panel Products
Calibration of the Styrene Cylinder Standards „_ _ _.
c3o. r ppn ^x^rene
f 389.3
143.1 prn Styr«r«
182 ppn Styrene /^ 298.8 M
/" " 238.5 1
V
00 8 '02 8 '84 8 '86 8>08 8 '18 8 '12 8'
ppn 23 May'97.ee'00<00
AUXILIARY FAN
(HH>nn>
14
-------
2.SSL
INITIAL CEM CALIBRATION AND PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
Plant: _
Location:
Date:
Parameter: SO2,CO2,O2,
Monitor:
Operator: _
Project #:
Span Value: 100
Chart Scale: 4
A
. oo-*>
Pbar, in. Hq.; 11. v-fl
Cylinder
#
AAL-HO
AAl_lftS»?>
M.wv.oae.1 Ul
Cal. Gas
Cone.,
;^f5pnjjor%
A
llo.S
4U2>.2>
8&fc».7
Chart Divisions
Direct
Injection
to Monitor
O. 0
2T. S
4T.D
<\bf\
\
Injection
Through
System
O'O
2. -7.0
4b.O
S1.0
Concentration
Predicted by
Equation,*
Direct System
1.0 l.ft
no.o -noS.2.
4U0.7, 4&t».S
p,p,ft.4 fttfl.^
Calibration
Error."*
% of 9 pair
<5A5>
0. / &
0.L-7
Sampling
System
Bias,'"*
% of Span
o.o
#.<
/.o
S.4
* Perform linear regression of pretest cat. gas concentration vs. chart divisions to
determine the following equation:
y = mx + b x = ppm y = chart divisions
For Data Reduction:
Pollutant, ppm/'/o = (Chart Division . b) = (CD + 0,63)
m
)
Correlation Coefficient =
Calculation concentration predicted by equatio using actual chart response
obtained from each calibration gas response.
** Analyzer cal. error, % cal. gas value = (Cal. gas cone., ppm - cone, predicted, ppm) x 100
Cal; gas value, ppm
Acceptable limit = < 2% of calibration gas value (< 5% for THC)
***
Sampling system bias = (Direct inject, gas cone. - System inject, gas cone.) x 100
Span value
Acceptable limit < 5% of span
Minimum detectable limit = 2% of span or 20 ^gm)or % (circle one)
Rise time to 95% of response for high cal. gas injected through the system
(return to zero after each injection): s, s, s Average • 21 s
Precision, % scale = difference in chart division response for two repeated
injections of the gas concentrations » - = %
(Clock time «= )
-------
JOd CU
DAILY GEM CALIBRATION AND PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
Plant:
Location:
Date:
Parameter: SO2, CO2, 02,
Monitor:
Operator: /?
Project #:
-
ft«..7
Calibrations (Chart Dfvlaions)
5:5O IOM^ il.-is lV.50
0-0. °-2- o.(^ h.T.
27.1 J7./
4fc.4 <«,./ 4t.O 45.1
8^ OT./
Concentration Predicted
By Equation*
ft', go io'.i4 il'zS ll'.^P
2."b 4 ">> 2-3 4."1)
2W.5 ztrt ^
459.'? 4
-------
-
-—^ GEM DATA REDUCTION - BAG ANALYSIS OR STEADY READINGS
Plant: L.K^^LO Parameter: SO2, C02, O2l NOX
Po
Run
MC-1-,
' '"
tl
11
ME -ft. -I
n.,tflr« ppm/o/. (Chart Division - b) (CD+o-ias)
m ( O.ICXHI )
Time**
(24-Hr)
-------
INITIAL CEM CAUBRATION AND PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
Plant:
Location: g^
Date: ^.
_£.
Parameter: SO2, CO2, O2,
Monitor:
Operator: _
Project #:
P.
Span Value: 100
Chart Scale: _t
Pbar, in. Hg.:_
Cylinder
#
Mpvor&buo
AAL.IIO
AALiaSI^,
.. •. : ".
Cal. Gas
Cone.,
o
a*£f.o£
7_-70.£
4foS.3>
Chart Divisions
Direct
Injection
to Monitor
O. O
/7.B
.£>
15.0
\
Injection
Through
System
0.0
/7. 2.
5-4. b
72.2.
f '
Concentration
Predicted by
Equation,*
Direct System
-/. t, -/.£
BS."b> &1.4-
2T 1 . <=\ ZU 5 . O
4C2.:S 44&. (s
•
1 . '
Calibration
Error,"
%of
/.4£
O . ^"2.
Sampling
System
Bias,-"
% of Span
o.o
6 ,b
/.+
-z.&
* Perform linear regression of pretest cal. gas concentration vs. chart divisions to
determine the following equation:
y = mx + b x = ppm y « chart divisions
For Data Reduction:
Pollutant, ppm/% = (Chart Division 'b> =
m
Correlation Coefficient =
Calculation concentration predicted by equatio using actual chart response
ootained from each calibration gas response.
** Analyzer cal. error, % cal. gas value = (CaL gas cone., ppm - cone, predicted, ppm) x 100
Cal. gas value, ppm
Acceptable limit = < 2% of calibration gas value (< 5% for THC)
*** Sampling system bias =
Acceptable limit < 5% of span
(Direct inject, gas cone. - System inject, gas cone.) x 100
Span value
Minimum detectable limit = 2% of span or
. ppm or % (circle one)
Rise time to 95% of response for high cal. gas injected through the system
(return to zero after each injection): s, s, s Average = 29 s
Precision, % scale = difference in chart division response for two repeated
injections of the gas concentrations = - = %
(Clock time = )
-------
3 apt CZ3
DAILY GEM CALIBRATION AND PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
Plant:
Location:
Date:
Operator: p.
Project #:
Time, Pretest: &:so Post-test:
Parameter: SO2, CO2, O2, NOX.(^HC)
Monitor: dSpgfror %
Span Value: 100
Chart Scale: o
Pbar, in. Hg.: J9.
Ambient Temp., F:
Cyl.
#
Cal. Gaa
Cone.,
0
£4.o8
1*70. £>
4&. •»>.-?,
Cftlibrations (Chart Divbions)
S'. 50 lo-.i*. u:i^ I!'- 50
A/ o."i o.( r>.\
/7,^ 18.0
5*2. 'jq.ft s^fl -?t,,V
^z.o 94.' 5
Concentration Predicted
By Equation*
S'5O 10:1^ 11:2.^ IT. '60
-in -0.7 -/.7 ~in
ftSH fl8."7
ITI.S m.b ai«.l 2B(.(
4t»7..4- 4*75 O
Analyzer
Calibration
Error,"
% of Span
/.
0.3-7
Drift,""
% of Span
0.7-
l.h
* Perform linear regression of pretest cal. gas concentration vs. chart divisions to
determine the following equation:
y = mx -f b x = ppm y = chart divisions
For Data Reduction:
Pollutant, ppm/% = (Chart Division - b) =
m
( o.
Correlation Coefficient =
Analyzer cal. error, % cal. gas value
(Cal. gas cone. - cone, predicted) x 100
Cal. gas value, ppm
Acceptable limit = < 2% of calibration gas value (< 5% for THC)
*** Drift % Span = (Post-test cal. response - initial cal. response) x 100
Span value
Acceptable limit < 3% of span
Minimum detectable limit = 2% of span or ppm or % (circle one)
Maximum zero drift = % of span or ppm or % (circle one)
Maximum calibration drift = % of span or ppm or % (circle one)
COMMENTS: Pretest or post-test (drde one) calibration used to quantitate
sample data. Post-test is used if drift exceeds limits and if post-test
yields higher
trati
.
-------
3 gg a
GEM DATA REDUCTION - BAG ANALYSIS OR STEADY READINGS
Plant:
Location:
Date:
Parameter: SO2, CO2, O2, NC-x*,d>c}cO
Operator:
Project*:
Pollutant, ppm/% =
(Chart Division - b)
m
Run
#
R6T-W-I
il
RE-vBfc-Z
RE-*-??
Time**
(24-Hr)
*?'• 12. - ^-'Z-Z
-Pf-
-//:/&
Average
Chart
Division
zs.s
23 ,<9
23-0
^4.0
23.0
23. 0
2/. 0
^/.<
^ to.o
/3.r>
-l/:i1\
JZ:oi- IT-.U
-it: tl
-I2.-.2.V
-/2.^.^
/Z.o
/7. -T
16.0
20 >b
Concentration
//""
SZ&.b
//3.^
/{3.*?
//^.O
n3fl
/ofl
/O3,g>
/0l>.4
48 ft
43 ~7
BBH
AU.2.
3£.&
9B,$
Comments
JTY//»7 ^
A\/6,= //^ 4 AM #o/)*
j* nv,iffrt rr/i*
Avi&~ /(>0,7 * A* /ha**
rva ^ f ^.j ..fa*
A - 25.2^ "Afe
/_^AC «l'+*? 3
Av/4 - 43 . / />/>/* /^>/Oa/
osia — f^tt^m input
* For NOX Indicate whether NO, NO + NO2 , or NO2 for specific interval.
** Indicate whether time interval is from beginning of first time to beginning
of second time or to end of second time (circle one, or describe alternate).
Calculated By:
Checked Bv:
•/
Date:
Date:
-------
APPENDIX A.2.13
Condition 12 Method 25 A
-------
LASCO Panel Products
Condition 12 - Main Exhaust
total Hydrocarbons (THC)
29-May-97
Calibration Gases
0.0 ppm
270.5 ppm
463.3 ppm
886.7 ppm
System Calibration
-4.2
266.9
457.8
881.6
Direct Calibration
-4.2
270.7
465.5
900.7
Correlation 0.9999983
Slope 0.9985874
Intercept -4.0277298
Sampling System Bias
0.00%
0.38%
0.77%
1.91%
Correlation 0.9999926
Slope 1.0204638
Intercept -5.240394
Calibration Error
0.03%
0.43%
8:37-9:37 Run 12-1| 363.5
9:49 Post Cal
10:41
Post Cal
11:05-12:04 Run 12-3| 309.0
12:09 Post Cal
12:31-13:31 Run 12-4| 300.4
13:48 Post Cal
Corrected 368.0 ppm THC
-0.4
461.6
-0.4
461.6
Drift 0.38%
0.38%
Drift
0.38%
0.38%
Corrected 313.5 ppm THC
-0.4
465.5
Drift 0.38%
0.77%
Corrected 304.9 ppm THC
-0.4
465.5
Drift 0.38%
0.77%
Pagel
-------
see. e
£88.8
p
p 780.0
6S8.8
P
R " '
0 400.0
P
A ;ae.e
N
E £00.0
100.0
0a
. V
1
LASCO Panel Products
1" 1
980.7
465.5
7 '50
Direct vs. Systen Calibrations
Calibration Cases
886.7 ppn
463.3 ppn
270.5 ppn
0.8 ppn
270.7
ppn 29 Maw '97, 07 <47<20
1W8.0'
S«0.0
£80.0
P
p 700.0
n
eee.0
p
R
0 408. 0
P
A ;eo.0
N
E £00.0
100.8
8.8
-4-2 ^ -4.2
£81.6
457.8
"
266.9
7 '55 8 i00 8 '05 8 '10
MAIN EXHAUST
I
LflSCO Panel Products
RUM ME-12-1 8 '37 - 9 '37
tJ
\r
h A.
AiMl^
WM
Mean 363.5 ppn Prepare
1 A .
Jii Ah
K(L All ir\jVWu (i/L r^vL JtJ\^!\nJ\fyil , ^ A N
\ s\ *r S V u v vx "M/\ \T WVw^/v^/i/V
i j* y /v \J " v "V^ » V * i "TI
V
8'40 8 '50
ppn 29 rtau'97.618'37'00
MAIN EXHAUST
9'30
P
p
n
p
R
P
A
N
E
ieee.81
»0.0
£80.0
700.8'
€00.0
TO0.0
408.8
:e0.0
cB8.8
180.0
8 a .
• w
t
LflSCO Panel Products
Svsten Calibration Drift Check
•
Calibration Cases
8.8 pen
463.3 Fpn
461.6
-0.4
' ^
/
/
-8.4 (
V /
9-50 9>31 9'52 9'53 9-54 9-55 9'56 9-57 9-58
ppn 29 rUv'97.89'49'43 HAIN EXHAUST
-------
1W8.0'
908.8
680.0
P
p 708.8
M
P -aaa
R -<30-0
0 480.0
P
A -fla n
M
E £08.0
100.0
0.0
u
LASCO Panel Products
Systen Calibration Drift Check
Calibration Gases
8.8 ppn
463.3 ppn
-0.4
461.6
1
1
*
10:41 18'42 10'43 10:44 10:45 10:46 10-47 10-48 10>49
ppm 29 May'97.10'40.23 MAIN EXHAUST
P
p
M
P
R
0
P
A
N
E
ie«0.0
900.0
E80.0
780.0
£00.0
400.0
288.6
£08.8
108.8
0.8
LftSCO Panel Products
RUN ME-13-3 11:85-12.04
(Van 389.0 ppn Propane
11:10
ppm 39 nay-97. 11:05. ee
H:£e
11-30 11-40
MAIM EXHAUST
11:50
12 >B0
P
p
9
J\
P
R
0
p
A
N
E
1000.0'
908.8
688.0
780.8
£00.8
MB. 8
408.8
:a0.e
c«e.e
iea.8
0^
.8
K
LASCO Panel Products
Systen Calibration Drift Check
Calibration Cases
8.8 ppn
463.3 ppn
465.5
-8.4
-e.4
IS-10 18'18
29 Mag'97,12'09.88
18'14
18-16
MAIN EXHAUST
18'18
18'80
-------
p
p
n
p
R
0
p
N
E
P
P
n
p
R
0
p
A
N
E
ff\n A ,
£80.0
780.0
€00.8
,,0.0
488.8
S80.0
c80.0
100.0
8.8
ppm
ieee.8'
we.e-
£88.0
788.8
£88.0
?60.0
488.8
:a0.o
£88.8
100.0
0.8
ppm
LASCO Panel Products
Rtn ME-12-4 13 '31 - 13 '31
,
Mean 380.4 ppn Propane
L*, AllxA A A A* JxA , K iri jAt L (l Hl/i H <
>vrAl n^^i^rJ "V/Avvr V V^vJw
••
12'40 12^58 13^00 13'18 13'28 13 '30
29 Hasi'97.12'31-00 MAIN EXHAUST
u
LASCO Panel Products
Systen Calibration Drift Check
Calibration Cases
0.0 PF<1
463.3 PF«
465. 5
-0.4 -0.4
13'48 13'S8 13^52 13'54 13^56 13''SS 14 = 06 14>0c
29 May '97. 13 '47' 24 MA IN EXHAUST
-------
LASCO Panel Products
Condition 12 - Room Exhaust
Total Hydrocarbons (THC)
29-May-97
Calibration Gases
0.0 ppm
84.1 ppm
270.5 ppm
463.3 ppm
System Calibration
-0.2
93.4
280.5
463.7
Direct Calibration
-0.2
87.6
280.5
477.1
Correlation 0.9996419
Slope 0.9975143
Intercept 5.3882472
Sampling System Bias
0.00%
1.16%
0.00%
2.68%
Correlation 0.9999892
Slope 1.0301538
Intercept 0.6144493
Calibration Error
0.43%
0.44%
Calibration Gases
0.0 ppm
84.1 ppm
270.5 ppm
463.3 ppm
System Calibration
7.5
93.4
280.5
467.5
Calibration Error
0.85%
1.01%
Correlation 0.9999454
Slope 0.9928857
Intercept 9.2096613
8:37-9:37 Run 12-1| 160.2
9:49 Post Cal
Corrected 152.1 ppm THC
10:41
Post Cal
7.5
278.5
7.5
276.6
Drift 0.00%
0.40%
Drift
0.00%
0.78%
11:06-12:04 Run 12-31 141.5
12:09 Post Cal
Corrected 133.2 ppm THC
7.5
274.7
Drift 0.00%
1.16%
12:31-13:31 Run12-4| 137.9
13:48 Post Cal
Corrected. 129.6 ppm THC |
5.5
265.2
Drift 0.40%
1.90%
Pagel
-------
EB0.0
450.0-
490.0
P
p 350.0
n
cUU.B
o £50.0
R
t\
u £80.0
P
A 150.0
N
E 100.0
50.0
0.0
I .*«*«••« 0 — 1 n 1 A_ '. 1
477.1
kl-IVWW • Till I« • 11 %rf«4««^> \^9
Direct us. Systen Calibrations
Calibration Gases
463.3 ppn
270.5 ppn
84.08 ppn
280.5
0.0 ppn
87.6
-0.2 A -0.2
•
i \^
j
463.7
'••
\- '
'•
280.5
,
93.4.
ppn 29
7'48
7^52
7:54
7^56 7^58 8-00
ROOM EXHAUST
8:02 8>04 8^06 8'6e
p
p
n
p
R
0
p
A
N
E
450.9
400.0
350.9
280.0
£50.9
£08. 8
150.0
100.0
50.0
9.0
spn
! Systen Calibration
i
Calibration Gases
463.3 ppn
0.0 ppn
270.5 ppn
84.08 ppn
/
280.5 1
\
93.4 1
1
8 11 8^12 8^13 8^14 8'15 8^16 8^17 8^18 8'19
29 nav'97,ea.i0<39 ROOM EXHAUST
P
p
N
P
R
0
P
A
N
E
M0.0
450.0
400.0
C-50.8
280.0
£50.0
£«e. e
150.0
100.0
so. e
e.e
LftSCO Panel Products
Ron RE-12-1 8'37 - 9'37
Mean 168.2 ppn Propane
8'40 8-58
29 Hav'97,08'37'00
9'00 9'18
ROOM EXHAUST
9-28
9*38
m>
-------
p
p
n
P
R
0
P
A
N
E
450.0'
400.0
330.8
380.9
£50.9
aee.e
159.9
199.9
50.9
0.0
I
LflSCO Panel Products
Systen Calibration Drift Check
Calibration Gases
8.8 ppn
278.5 ppm 378.5
7.5
ppn
9 = 49 9'50
May'97,69'48'85
9-51
9-58 9-53 9 = 54
ROOM EXHAUST
9-55
9 - E6 9-57
(HH'HM)
p
p
R
0
P
A
N
E
458.0
488.8
338.8
;a0.e
».•
£88 0
158.8
108.8
58.8
0.0
I
LASCO Panel Products
Systen Calibraiton Drift Check
Calibration Cases
0.0 ppn
370.5 ppn 276-6
f 1
7.5
I
18=41 18=42 10=43 10-44 10'45 10=46 10'47 10=48 10=49
nnm 29 Hay '97. 18 = 40 '29 ROOM EXHAUST
P
p
n
p
R
o
p
A
N
E
M0.0
450.0
400.0
cS0.0
J80.0
£59.0
£88.0
1S0.8
180.0
58.8
0.8
LASCO Panel Products
Run RE-12-3 11-06 - 12=84
Mean 141.5 ppn Propane
ll'le 11'28
29 Kay'97,11=83-80
11=30 11'48
ROOM EXHAUST
11=58
12-00
28%
-------
P
p
N
P
R
0
P
A
N
E
450.0
400.0
C-30.0
;a0.0
£•50.0
£30.0
150.0
100.0
50.0
0.0
E
LASCQ Panel Products
System Calibration Drift Check
Calibration Gases
0.0 ppn
270.5 ppn
274.7
7.5
^^^^^^J
~~ \
p
p
n
p
R
0
p
A
N
E
PR"
M0.0
450.0
400.8
C-50.0-
:a0.0
£•50.0
150.0-
100.0
50.0-
e.e-
ppn
13'ie 13:13 12-14 12-16 12'18 13>30 13 = 32
29 May '97.13< 09 '01 ROOM EXHAUST (HH-MM)
LASCO Panel Products
Run RE-12-4 12:31 - 13:31
Hean 137.9 ppn Propane
~-^^^~ — ^ ^^v^^_^--^--— ^^^-^-^ ^^
12:40 12:50 13:80 13:18 13'£0 lalaa
39 May '97. 13: 31: 80 ROOM EXHAUST Wm*
P
p
M
P
R
0
P
A
N
E
458.8
400.0
C-50.0
£«0.8
150. 0
100.0
50.0
e.e
9PW
1
LASCO Panel Products
Systen Calibration Drift Check
Calibration Cases
0.0 ppn
270.5 ppn
7.3
365.3
13 '50 13 '52 13 '54 13 '56 13 '58 14 '60
89HW97.13.48.10 • ROOM EXHAUST (HH-MH)
-------
LASCO Panel Products
Condition 12 - Auxiliary Fan
Total Hydrocarbons (THC)
29-May-97
Calibration Gases
0.0 ppm
84.1 ppm
270.5 ppm
463.3 ppm
System Calibration
1.7
85.7
270.9
458.0
Direct Calibration
1.7
1 89.5
280.5
475.2
Correlation 0.999979
Slope 0.98521
Intercept 2.6291198
Sampling System Bias
0.00%
0.76%
1.92%
3.44%
Correlation 0.9999831
Slope 1.0214662
Intercept 2.8658002
Calibration Error
0.87%
0.48%
8:37-9:37 Run 12-1| 182.9
9:42 Post Cal
10:50
Post Cal
11:05-12:04 Run 12-3| 147.6
12:19 Post Cal
12:31-13:31 Run 12-4| 147.8
13:41 Post Cal
Corrected 183.0 ppm THC
3.6
267.1
1.7
267.1
Drift 0.38%
0.76%
Drift
0.00%
0.76%
Corrected 147.1 ppm THC
1.7
263.3
Drift 0.00%
1.52%
Corrected 147.4 ppm THC |
3.6
269.0
Drift 0.38%
0.38%
Pagel
-------
p
p 350.0
n
380.0
o £50.0
R
0
P C '
A 150.0
N
E 100.0
50.0
0A
• 0
463.3 ppn
270.5 ppn
84.08 ppn
280.5 270.9 1
:>'
89.5 85.7
1.7 1.7
8:22 8:24 8:26 8:28 3:38 8:32 8:34 8:36
ppn 29 May '97.ee = 21: 35 AUXILIARY FAN (HH'Mrl)
560.0 1 "~~~"~"~^
450.0-
400.0-
P
p 350.0
n
380.0
p
„ £50.0
R
f\
u £90.0
p
A 150.0
N
E 100.0
50.0
0.0
I
LASCO Panel Products
Run ftF-12-1 8:37 - 9:37
A |i
In
h
. A Jm
A I , f\ J^\
A n k j"-v j. A j L/ \
J\ . I LI I j, X^^M/VN/U/L I \A i
^MM JV^M M^ uj^ Xo, Jii n ,
w vx^J"^'-^ \iv M^ «• ^^vLJVA^^^J
\AI V
(V
Mean 182.9 ppn Propane
8^40 8:50 9:00 9:10 9 ' C« 9:38
ppn 29 May'97. 68.38 = 80 AUXILIARY FAN
M0.0 T ~
450.0-
400.0
P
p 350.0
n
380.0
R £50'0
0 -,ja 0
P
A 150.0
N
E 100.0
50.0
0.0
l
LASCO Panel Products
Svsten Calibration Drift Check
Calibration Gase-s
0.0 ppn
270.5 ppn 267.1
r \
3.6
9'43 9'44 9'45 9'46 9'47 9'48 9'49 9'S8
ppn 29 MW97.69-4a.e8 AUXILIARY FAN
-------
p
p
M
P
R
0
P
A
N
E
P
P
tl
P
R
0
P
A
N
E
P
P
M
P
R
0
P
A
N
E
450.0
488.8
:-se.e
:»o.e
£•58.8
c.80.0
158.8
lee. e
58.8
e.e
ppn i
M0.e-
458.8-
488.8
:<30.e
;ae.e
£58.8
EflO.0
158.8
tee.e
50. e
e.e
ppn
;«0.o
450.0
4B0.0
330.8
280.0
£50.8
£«8.e
150.0
100.0
I
LflSCO Panel Products
Systen Calibration Drift Check
Calibration Gases
0.0 ppn
2*>.S OT. M7-'
^ \
,, 1 \
10i51 10-52 18<53 10 '54 10=55
>9 Haw '97. 10 -50 '32 AUXILIARVFAN
I
LflSCO Panel Products
Run ftF-12-3 11 '85 - 12<84
h«»n 147.6 ppn Propane
. . II 1
l Uyl M ^,. K h , Id ll 1
UkJV^\L/H MAi^^U^Vlv^A^UV. JVWA/\
U \ vr ^A*/ V^^^^-<>~A,
V
11-18 11 -ae 11 '30 11-48 11-50 12 '00
29 May '97, 11 '05' 88 AUXILIARVFAN (HH-WI)
1
LASCO Panel Products
Swsten Calibration Drift Check
Calibration Cases
0.0 ppn
270.5 ppn 263-3
\
12'19 12'28
29 Haw'97.12'18'26
12'81
12'22 12-23 12-24
AUXILIARY FAN
12-25
12-26
12 • £7
MH>
-------
p
p
n
p
R
o
p
ft
N
E
500,
450.
400.
:-se.
£50.
£38.
150.
100.
50.
0.
PR"
LASCO Panel Products
Ren AF-12-4 IZ'31 - 13'31
Mean 147.8 PPPI Propane
12'40
29 May'97.12-31'00
12'58
13-00 13'ie
AUXILIARV FAN
13-20
13'30
-------
INITIAL CEM CALIBRATION AND PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
Plant:
Location:
Date:
Parameter: SO2, CO2, O2, NO)
Monitor:
Operator: P.
Project #:
Span Value: 100
Chart Scale: _j
Pbar, in. Hg.:_
Cylinder
#
AALIIO
AM_iasi-2»
Auvvoifcibi
Cal. Gas
Cone.,
^ppnjor %
<0
27O.S
4fo3.3
33^.7
Chart Divisions
Direct
Injection
to Monitor
6.O
2.1.1
4U.7
3&.O
1
Injection
Through
System
O.O
2Ufl
4€>A
fefe.D
I
Concentration
Predicted by
Equation,'
Direct System
2.0 Z.O
2C.&.& 2l»t».fo
4UI.1 4^3 ..4
Calibration
Error,""
%of-Spen-
SiK-S
<2.£3
-------
DAILY GEM CALIBRATION AND PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
Location:
Date:
Parameter: SO2, CO2, O2, NOX,
Monitor: "Uftfl 4sfl 4&,3
Concentration Predicted
By Equation*
fl'.oo ^'.^o n-a.Q ii'.m \^>'4S
-O.I -O.I
211. 1
4t2.U 4t,r.U
SAto.l Ifffl.o |flflf q
-o.l -o.l ~o.l
4b3.b4tt.fe> 4fefe.(J
Analyzer
Calibration
Error,-"
% of Span
£•22-
0.16
DrHf"
% of Span
6.O
0.4
' Perform linear regression of pretest cal. gas concentration vs. chart divisions to
determine the following equation:
y = mx + b x = ppm y = chart divisions
For Data Reduction:
Pollutant, ppm/% = (Chart Division - b) = (CD -0.006}
_ /.. . ^ /n.. _ \
Correlation Coefficient =
**
Analyzer cal. error, % cal. gas value
(Cal. gas cone. - cone, predicted) x 100
Cal. gas value, ppm
Acceptable limit = < 2% of calibration gas value (< 5% for THC)
***
Drift, % Span =
(Post-test cal. response - initial cal. response) x 100
Span value
Acceptable limit < 3% of span
Minimum detectable limit = 2% of span or ppm or % (circle one)
Maximum zero drift .= % of span or ppm or % (drde one)
Maximum calibration drift = % of span or ppm or % (drde one)
COMMENTS: Pretest or post-test (drde one) calibration used to quantitate
sample data. Post-test Is used if drift exceeds limits and if post-test
yields higher concentrations.
-------
GEM DATA REDUCTION - BAG ANALYSIS OR STEADY READINGS
Parameter: SO2l CO2,
Location:
Date:
Operator: />
Project #:
Pollutant, ppm/% = (Chart Division - b) = (CP.,.*>s)
Run
#
KE-47.-I
HE-I2.-Z
ME- 11 -7,
Time**
(24-Hr)
ft'-^T- g'.47
-s-.s-y
- U
\
Average
Chart
Division
33
33
3<9
^^
37
14
15
33
ID
16
1G
1C
1&
31
Concentration
/P"
3SZ.I*
31>X.tD
3^?i.O
34Z. (o
372. .^
342-t,
.35^.7
33-2 -b
302.3
301. 3
3<92.3
.30z.^,
^02.3
3/1.4
Comments
jrum L
A.\»/k-^ 352.7 /»jO»»f M>/u
\ * r\\ r^
V UIL^
-KUU-V x
(. tfTAtT Tlrts* N-'OS ^
^s/6- ^4^. 2^v*- Pfoaa.
* For NOX Indicate whether NO, NO + NO2, or NO2 for specific interval.
**
Indicate whether time interval is from beginning of first time to beginning
of second time or to end of second time (circle one, or describe alternate).
Calculated-By:
Checked By:__
Date:.
Date:
-------
3 a a da
= GEM DATA REDUCTION - BAG ANALYSIS OR STEADY READINGS
Location:
Date:
Parameter: SO2, CO2, Q2. NOx*CfHQ) CO
Operator: /?
Project #•
Pollutant, ppm/% = (Chart Division - b) = (CD -o.
m
Run
v . #
Me-ii-4
Time"* i
(24-Hr)
\-L'^\- i?.:«M
- /2 .' .s/
-/•*.-ox
-/^///
-/j/2/
-/v^i
Average
Chart
Division
3/
21
3& i
21
ZZ
23
Concentration
/jfim
3/2.4
232 2.
Comments
3Urwl
302. 3 I
21 2. Z.
2dZ..2.
23% Z-
AAl6-2f^^ y^f/^
* For NOX Indicate whether NO, NO + NO2, or NO2 for specific interval.
**
Indicate whether time interval is from beginning of first time to beginning
or second time or to end of second time (circle one, or describe alternate).
Calculated By:
Checked By:.
/2./-T~
Date:
-------
INITIAL CEM CALIBRATION AND PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
LKSCO
Plant:
Location:
Date: s-2.9-
ifc.l
51. 0
^W.2>
Injection
Through
System
•2..O
14. 7.
^T.O
34.o
Concentration
Predicted by
Equation,"
Direct System
-/.-* 4/9
A4.1 L°\
Sampling
System
Bias,-**
% of Span
/.I
/./
o.o
2.3
* Perform linear regression of pretest cat. gas concentration vs. chart divisions to
determine the following equation:
y = mx + b x = ppm y = chart divisions
For Data Reduction:
Pollutant, ppm/% = (Chart Division - b) = (CD-4.&/)
m
( o. 201/9 )
Correlation Coefficient =
Calculation concentration predicted by equatio using actual chart response
obtained from each calibration gas response.
** Analyzer cal. error, % cat. gas value = (Cal. gas cone., ppm - cone, predicted, ppm) x 100
Cal. gas value, ppm
Acceptable limit = < 2% of calibration gas value (< 5% for THC)
***
Sampling system bias
(Direct inject, gas cone. - System inject, gas cone.) x 100
Span value
Acceptable limit < 5% of span
Minimum detectable limit = 2% of span or /D ropm^r % (circle one)
Rise time to 95% of response for high cal. gas injected through the system
(return to zero after each injection): s, s, s Average « 23 s
Precision, % scale = difference in chart division response for two repeated
injections of the gas concentrations = - » %
(Clock time = )
-------
DAILY GEM CALIBRATION AND PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
Plant:
Location: -Rootw g
Date: ^. -> Q
Parameter: SO2, CO2, O2t
Monitor:
Operator: p.
Project #:
Time, Pretest:
Run#:
Span Value: 100
______ Chart Scale: £:
• Pbar, in. Hg.: _
Post-test: I5-.4S Ambient Temp., F:
Cyl.
#
CaLGaa
^prft/or %
O
84-oa
2-70.5
4fc,?>.^
Calibrations (Chart OMaions)
8--00 <\\^?> in-.MO li'.io i^:4S
2.O i.O -z.O 2.O 2.O
rt.t.
5-7.0 5^.*l Sb.l SSH 54.O ... ._.
Concentration Predicted
By Equation*
fi'.oo <\'.5o io:4.D ir-io I3-4S
-1. 7. -1.7. -/.I -(.2. -1.2.
04.4
1TZ.-7 2b^!n 2U&.2. lfeb.7_ 257.2
4S.O Uuifl
Analyzer
Calibration
Error,"
% of Span
0.2>g>
0.»l
Drift*"
% of Span
a.O
),~7
* Perform linear regression of pretest cai. gas concentration vs. chart divisions to
determine the following equation:
y = mx + b x = ppm y = chart divisions
For Data Reduction:
Pollutant, ppm/% = (Chart Division - b) = (CD -z.z44)
Correlation Coefficient =
m
0
)
Analyzer cai. error, % cai. gas value
(Cal. gas cone. - cone, predicted) x 100
Cai. gas value, ppm
Acceptable limit = < 2% of calibration gas value (< 5% for THC)
***
Drift, % Span =
(Post-test cai. response - initial cai. response) x 100
Span value
Acceptable limit < 3% of span
Minimum detectable limit = 2% of span or ppm or % (circle one)
Maximum zero drift = % of span or ppm or % (cirde one)
Maximum calibration drift = % of span or ppm or % (cirde one)
COMMENTS: Pretest or post-test (drde one) calibration used to quantitate
sample data. Post-test is used if drift exceeds limits and if post-test
yields higher concentrations.
-------
GEM DATA REDUCTION - BAG ANALYSIS OR STEADY READINGS
Date:
Parameter: SO2,C02,Q2, NOy1
Operator:
Project #:
Pollutant, ppm/% = (Chart Division - b) = (CD
m
CO
Run
Time**
(24-Hr)
Average
Chart
Division
Concentration
Comments
RE-I2.-I
-?••/?
-4:2-7
AV6-
RE-17.-2.
lo:o-7 -
25
rr
"'•PW -HMIn
27-
^
* For NOX Indicate whether NO, NO + NO2, or NO2 for specific interval.
** Indicate whether time interval is from beginning of first time to beginning
of second time or to end of second time (circle one, or describe alternate).
? /) . ^->
Calculated By:.
Checked By:_
0
Date:.
Date:.
-------
' GEM DATA REDUCTION - BAG ANALYSIS OR STEADY READINGS
Plant:
Location:
Date:
Parameter: SO2, C02. Q2, NQx*.ofia)CO
Operator: /?
Project #:
Pollutant, ppm/% = (Chart Division ' b) = (CD '*
Run
#
Re- 17.-^
i
Time"*
(24-Hr)
iv. 31- iz:4 t
-/2.'^/
-/J:o/
-/3MI
- f^JZl
-/3:.^l
Average
Chart
Division
24
2&
27
2&.S
23. S
31 .5
-
Concentration t
w* 1
//^. ^3
/J&.3
/J?.'3*
/3O.8
/3o &
;4$n
Comments
3lxrw 5
/,\/6i - /J7.&MM nb.
.
* For NOX Indicate whether NO, NO + NO2 , or NO2 for specific interval.
**
Indicate whether time interval is from beginning of first time to beginning
of second time or to end of second time (circle one, or describe alternate).
Calculated Bv;
Cheeked Bv:
0
Data:
Date':
-------
INITIAL GEM CAUBRATION AND PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
Plant:
Location:
Date:
Parameter: SO2,C02,O2. NOX{
Monitor: <0pffitor %
,9-7
Operator:
Project #:
Span Value: _
Chart Scale: _,
Pbar, in. Hg.:
100
Cylinder
#
ALmoz&t>i,£
AA.L11O
AM-lfcSli
Cal. Gas
Cone.,
^P^or%
Q
84.0&
^.1Qi£
4i,^.3?
Chart Divisions
Oiract
Injection
to Monitor
o.o
/^ £
TL.O
^•5" O
1
Injection
Through
System
O.O
/7-O
<4.e>
41.1
Concentration
Predicted by
Equation,*
Direct System
-LI- -l.b
as.?> ai.4
m .^ ibb.o
*4lol.?> 443.2.
Calibration
Error,"*
% of fipan*
diAc<,
/.4s
0.52.
Sampling
System
Bias,***
% of Span
O.O
O.B
1.2.
a. 4
* Perform linear regression of pretest cal. gas concentration vs. chart divisions to
determine the following equation:
y = mx + b x = ppm y = chart divisions
For Data Reduction:
Pollutant, ppm/% = (Chart Division - b) = (CD -4.325;)
— / — — — *t s\ *\ \
m
(0.20400)
Correlation Coefficient =
**
Calculation concentration predicted by equatio using actual chart response
obtained from each calibration gas response.
(CaL qas conc" ppm ' conc- Predicted'
Analyzer cal. error, % cal. gas value =
Cal. gas value, ppm
Acceptable limit = < 2% of calibration gas value ( < 5% for THC)
100
(Direct inject, gas conc. - System inject, gas conc.) x 100
Span value
*** Sampling system bias
Acceptable limit < 5% of span
Minimum detectable limit =» 2% of span or /&
-------
3 act
DAILY GEM CALIBRATION AND PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
Location:
Date:
Parameter: SO2, CO2, 02,
Monitor: d5prf£br%
Operator: P.
Project #: ^4op;.oo3>
Span Value: 100
Chart Scale: _£
Pbar, in. Hg.:
Time, Pretest: ft-.1,0 Post-test: I2>:4o Ambient Temp., F:
'-\-L'^. AP-I7.-4.
ro aa
Cyl.
#
Cal. Gas
Cone.,
(£g$J or %
O
84-oft
270. S
44,1.^
Calibrations (Chart Divisions)
S'-IO
n.o
S^.ft ^ | ^3.0 SI. I. ^.^
11,1
Concentration Predicted
By Equation*
8'3O ^'.4o io:so I1M5 llt'.'fO
-I.S i.t o.O -i.o O,O
85.0
m.'b 2ban ^ts.z 2u4.t 270.^
4tl.l
Analyzer
Calibration
Error."
% of Scan
Uo1
O.b7
Drift,*-
% of Span
^. A
/.&
* Perform linear regression of pretest cal. gas concentration vs. chart divisions to
determine the following equation:
y » mx + b x = ppm y = chart divisions
For Data Reduction:
Pollutant, ppm/% = (Chart Division - b) = (CD -0.21$)
m
)
Correlation Coefficient
**
Analyzer cal. error, % cal. gas value
(Cal. gas cone. - cone, predicted) x 100
Cal. gas value, ppm
Acceptable limit = < 2% of calibration gas value (< 5% for THC)
***
Drift, % Span =
(Post-test cal. response - initial cal. response) x 100
Span value
Acceptable limit < 3% of span
Minimum detectable limit = 2% of span or ppm or % (circle one)
Maximum zero drift = % of span or ppm or % (circle one)
Maximum calibration drift = % of span or ppm or % (cirde one)
COMMENTS: Pretest or post-test (circle one) calibration used to quantrtate
sample data. Post-test is used if drift exceeds limits end if post-test
yields higher concentrations.
-------
GEM DATA REDUCTION - BAG ANALYSIS OR STEADY READINGS
Plant:
Location:
Date:
-
Time**
(24-Hr)
a:-v7 -ft-' 4-1
-fl'.ST
-*07
- 3V7
-9*7
-7/37
lO'.O-J - IQ-.n
-IO-.7.T
tr-ot - H MU
-n-iu
-//:?A
-///VA
-///<£,
-/?/o2
Average
Chart
Division
3k
31. ft
3.^
^/
3S
Z1
.3L
2-7
?£>
.?A
23
24
2&
2t>
Concentration
W
I6I.1
I5&.6
iut>,4
101. 1
141.4
I4b.l
181.1
135,^
757.2.
/jf/Z
/^./
/4*./
/4/.D
S3b.#
Comments
-TuiM 4
ANl6t - 775", J ^ /%>A
\ / ^TT^
vUlU
'Rowv^s riTaL\r "t\rv«tf
/HO*
kd^J44.4^Mfr*/*
* For NOX Indicate whether NO, NO + NO2, or NO2 for specific interval.
** Indicate whether time interval is from beginning of first time to beginning
of second time or to end of second time (circle one, or describe alternate).
Calculated By:.
Checked By:_
Date:
-------
GEM DATA REDUCTION - BAG ANALYSIS OR STEADY READINGS
Plant:
Location:
Parameter: SO2, CO2, Q2, NQx*(TrHC)cO
Operator:
Project #: v
- (Chart Division - b)
m
. QO3
Run
#
AF-17.-4
Time"*
(24-Hr)
IT.::M - tz-.4|
-/2:si
~'7V°i
-i-^m
-i-v; 2L|
-'^•Si
Average
Chart
Division
2.1*
Z&
*; 27
2?>
22
3\
-
Concentration
/3/»/»7
/3O.&
/4/.O
A33tf
J4I.O
/4I.O
/Sk.^
Comments
-^mvs\ ^
M&- /4/.O ^ flo.
-
* For NOX Indicate whether NO, NO + NO2, or NO2 for specific interval.
**
Indicate whether time interval is from beginning of first time to beginning
or second time or to end of second time (circle one, or describe alternate).
Calculated By:.
Checked By:_
I/
Date:.
Dato:
-------
APPENDIX A.2.14
Condition 13 Method 25A
-------
LASCO Panel Products
Condition 13 - Main Exhaust
Total Hydrocarbons (THC)
29-May-97
Calibration Gases
0.0 ppm
270.5 ppm
463.3 ppm
886.7 ppm
System Calibration
-0.4
270.7
465.5
893.1
Calibration Error
0.30%
0.08%
Correlation 0.9999982
Slope 1.0080115
Intercept -1.1456555
15:20-16:15 Run 13-11 194.8
16:27 PostCal
Corrected 194.4 ppm THC |
-0.4
457.8
Drift 0.00%
0.77%
16:37-17:37 Run 13-2| 184.1
17:45 PostCal
Corrected 183.8 ppm THC |
-0.4
457.8
Drift 0.00%
0.77%
18:02-19:02 Run 13-31 188.9
19:16 PostCal
Corrected 188.5 ppm THC
-4.2
457.8
Drift 0.38%
0.77%
Calibration Gases
0.0 ppm
270.5 ppm
463.3 ppm
886.7 ppm
System Calibration
-4.2
270.7
465.5
900.7
Calibration Error
0.03%
0.43%
Correlation 0.9999926
Slope 1.0204638
Intercept -5.2403935
102 ppm Styrene
143.1 ppm Styrene
250.7 ppm Styrene
19:47
247.8
Corrected 248.0 ppm THC
289.8
Corrected 289.1 ppm THC
400.5
Corrected 397.6 ppm THC
Post Cat
-4.2
465.5
Drift 0.00%
0.00%
Pagel
-------
p
p
n
p
R
o
p
A
N
E
««e.e
£89.8
ree.e
££8.9
fee.e
488. e
CVV« v
c«0.o
lee.e
e.e
ppn
LASCO Panel Products
893.1
Systtn Calibration
Calibration Gases
886.7 ppn
463.3 ppn
270.5 ppn
0.0 ppn
\_
465.5 \
\
270.7
-0.4
14-48 14=50 14 = 52 14<54 14 = E6 14=58 15=98
29 May '97. 14 = 46 = 54 MAIN EXHAUST
-------
p
p
n
p
R
o
p
N
E
S80.0
£80.8
708.8
£88.8
488.8
388.8
188.8
8.8
LASCO Panel Products
Run ME-13-1 15-a0 - 16-15
Mean 194.8 ppn Propane
TVkjvVVVv^^
15'20 15-38
ppn 29 Hay'97,15-28-88
15-40 15-50
MAIN EXHAUST
16-10
(HH'MM)
P
p
n
p
R
0
p
ft
N
E
P
P
n
P
R
0
P
ft
N
E
1CO8.0
s«e.e-
£80.0
700.0
680.0
?ea. a
400.0
388.8
£80. 0
108.8
0a
• o
16
i
LASCO Panel Products
Systen Calibration Drift Check
Calibration Cases
0.8 ppn
463.3 ppn
457.8
r
-0.4 1
-24 16-26 16-28 16-30 16-32 16-34
ppn 29 nay'97,16 33-Sa HA IN EXHAUST
ieee.0
see.e
£80.0
700.0-
680.0
saa.e
488. e
388. B
£80.0
lea. e
e.e
1
LASCO Panel Products
RLCI ME-13-2 16-37 - 17-37
Mean 184. 1 ppn Propane
v^/**Wv^^
16-40 16-50 17-80 17-10 17-28 17-38
29 n«y'97,16-37-88 HA IN EXHAUST M1>
-------
1W0.0
980.0-
£88.0
P
p 780.0
M
£80.0
P
R " '
0 400.0
P
A ;80.e
N
E £88.8
180.0
a a
. O
LASCO Panel Products
System Calibration Drift Check
Calibration Gases
0.0 ppn
463.3 ppn
r
-0.4
17-46 17-47 17-48 17-49 17-50
ppn 39 Hay '97. 17 45-39 MAIN EXHAUST
ItWD. 0
£80.0
P
p 780.0
n
£80.0
L 500.0-
R
0 400.0
P
N
E £80.0
188. 8
8.8
LftSCO Panel Products
Run ME-13-3 18-82 - 19-82
Mean 188.9 ppn Propane
I
_
i'
!•
457.8
••
\
17-51 17-52 ' 17-5:
(HH-MM)
I
\^f^^^^^
18-18 18-28 18-38 18-48
ppn 39 Hay '97. 18 -02- 08 HA IN EXHAUST
ieee.0
980.0
£88.0
P
p 780.0
N
LflSCO Panel Products
Systen Calibration Drift Check
Calibration Gases
0.0 pen
469.3 Dem
18-58 19-08
(HH'HM)
K
19-17 19'18 19'19
89 Hay'97,19-16-47
19'88
19-21 19-22
MAIN EXHAUST
19'23
19-24
19-25 19'86
m>
-------
p
p 700.0
£00.0
p
L. M0.0
R
ft
U 400.0
P
A 380.0
100.0
0.0
OOD. r ppn
463.3 ppn
270.5 ppn
0.0 ppn
463.5
V\
\
\
\ 270.7
i r
i
-4.2 [ ^_~4'2 f
19'27 19^28 13--S9 19'30 19-31 19^32 19'33 19'34 19'35
ppm 29 Mav'97.19'26'88 MAIN EXHAUST (HH-MM)
icce.e I
688.8
P
p 700.0
H
£00.0
p
„ M0.0
R
0 400 0
P
A :a0. e
N
ET <•****
100.0
0.0
I
LASCO Panel Prcducts
Calibration of Styrene Cylinder Staridards
258.7 ppn Styrene
400.5 \
\
f\
(
f
J L
19'35 19<36 19-37 19-38 19'39 19'40 19'41 19'42 19'43 19'44 19'45
ppm 29 May'97.19'35'88 MAIN EXHAUST
ieea.0*
s«0.e
680. 0
p
1
p 700.0
M
£00.0
P M0.e
0 400.0
p
A 288. 6
-N
E c«0.0
100.0
8.0
PPM
LASCO Panel Products
Calibration Drift Check
Calibration Cans
463.3 ppn
0.0 ppn
465.5
. r \
i \
\ \
\ \
\
11 \
Wttag'97. 19-46.53 MAIN EXHAUST <*"">
-------
LASCO Panel Products
Condition 13 - Room Exhaust
Total Hydrocarbons (THC)
29-May-97
Calibration Gases
0.0 ppm
84.1 ppm
270.5 ppm
463.3 ppm
System Calibration
5.5
87.6
265.2
450.4
Calibration Error
1.09%
0.11%
Correlation 0.9999949
Slope 0.9589735
Intercept 6.0936881
15:20-16:15 Run. 13^1 ( 102.3
16:27 PostCal
Corrected 100.3 ppm THC
7.5
269.0
Drift 0.40%
0.76%
16:37-17:37 Run 13-21 106.3
17:51 PostCal
Corrected 104.5 ppm THC
5.5
272.8
Drift 0.00%
1.52%
18:02-19:02 Run 13-3| 108.6
19:16 PostCal
Corrected 106.9 ppm THC
5.5
274.7
Drift 0.00%
1.90%
Calibration Gases
0.0 ppm
84.1 ppm
270.5 ppm
463.3 ppm
System Calibration
5.5
91.5
282.4
473.3
Calibration Error
0.01%
0.91%
Correlation 0.999964
Slope 1.0106238
Intercept 6.5327507
102 ppm Styrene
143.1 ppm Styrene
250.7 ppm Styrene
20:16
261.4
305.3
412.2
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
252.2
295.6
401.4
ppm THC
ppm THC
ppm THC
Post Cal
5.5
288.1
Drift
0.00%.
1.14%
Pagel
-------
p
p 350.0
f
n
R £50'0
f\
u £«o.e
P
A 158.0
N
E lee.e
50.0
8.0
U . O Pf-Tt
463.3 ppn
270.5 ppn
84.08 ppn
265.2
87. 6 I
5.5 \
14-46 14-48 14-50 14-53 14-54 14-56 14-58
ppn 29 nay'97. 14-44- 10 ROOM EXHAUST (HH-MM)
500. 8'
450.0
408.0
P
p :-50.0
n
388.8
P
' £50.0
R
ft
u cflo.e
P
A 150.0
N
E 188.8
58. 8
0.8
1
LASCO Panel Products
Run RE-13-1 15-20 - 16-15
Mean 102.3 ppn Propane
15-28 15-38 15-48 15-50 16-88 16-10
ppn 29 May '97, 15 -28- 80 ROOM EXHAUST (HH-IW)
500.8
450.0
400.0
P
p cOo.u
M
Q
D £70.0
R
2 MO.O
P
A 150.8
N
E 180.8
50.0
e.e
I
LASCO Panel Products
Systen Calibration Drift Check
Calibration Gases
0.0 ppn
278'5 PPM 269.0
f" I
1
16-27 16-88 16-29 16-38 16-31 16-32 16-33 16-34
ppm 29 Mav '97. 16 -26 -22 ROOM EXHAUST , OtHHTO
360
-------
p
p
H
P
R
0
P
A
N
E
P
P
N
P
R
0
P
A
N
E
P
P
N
P
R
0
P
- A
_H
E
458.0
480.0
SS0.0
:a0.0
£50.0
£90.0
150.0
180.0
50.0
0.0
ppm c
458.8
488.8
:-se.e
;ee.e
£58. e
£90.0
158.8
180.8
58.8
e.e
ppn
MO. e
458.8
400.0
330.8
,88e
£50.0
£«8.o
150.0
108.0
50. e
e.e
ppn
LflSCO Panel Products
Run RE-13-2 16-37 -
^^-^* ~^f^~*^*~>-s~~*^
16-40 16>50
9 May '97. 16 '37 '88
LASCO Panel Products
17 '37
Mean 186.3 ppn Propane
17'88 17'ie 17'28 17'38
ROOM EXHAUST
i
:•
(HH'MM)
I
Systen Calibration Drift Check
Calibration Gases
8.8 ppn
270.5 ppn
5.5
272.8
r 1
1
17'52 17'53 17'54 17'55 17'56 17'57
29 May '97. 17 51 '01 ROOM EXHAUST
LflSCO Panel Products
Run RE- 13-3 18-02
18-18
29 May '97, 18 -82 -88
- 19-02
Mean 108.6 ppn Propane
18-28 10-38 18-48 18-58
ROOM EXHAUST
(HH'MM)
1
/
19-ee
-------
p
p
n
p
R
0
P
A
N
E
458.0
488.6
C-S0.0
:a0.0
£•50.0
£98. 8
158.6
168.6
58.0
e.e
pom
r*?*"
1
LflSCO Panel Products
System Calibration Drift Check
Calibration Cases
8.0 ppn
a*.t H. 2?4_7
f \
J 1
19-17 19-18 19-19 19-£« 19-21 19-32 19-23 19-24 19-2
29 nay *97. 19 -16 -14 ROOM EXHAUST CHH-MM)
P
P
N
P
R
0
P
A
N
E
456.6
466.6
:-se.e
;ee.e
158.8
100.0
58.8
8.0
19
ppn
LASCO Panel
Products
/ 473.3
|
1
5.5
Calibration Cases
8.0 ppn
463.3 ppn
270.5 ppn
282.4
84.08 ppn
91.5
I
5.5
29 May '97, 19- 46- 80 ROOM EXHAUST
P
p
n
p
R
o
p
-A
430.8
488.0
:-se.e
zee.e
£58.8
£«8.0
158. B
188. 8
50.8
8.0
19
PP"
LASCO Panel Products
Calibration of Styrene Cylinder Standards 230.7 ppn Styrene
•^—
r 412.2
102 ff>n Styrene S~" 305.3
r 26i.4 V
58 20>00 20*08 20104 20*86 20 '08 20>tB
29 Hw'97, 19.58. W ROOM EXHAUST HH>
-------
p
p
n
p
R
o
p
A
N
E
338.0
450.8
488.8
SS0.0
:-80.0
150.0
100.0
50.8
8.8
LASCO Panel Products
Calibration Drift Check
Calibration Cases
8.0 ppn
270.5 ppn
20-16
ppn 29 May'97.cB>15'29
20> 17
20;18
ROOM EXHAUST
20-19
(HH'MM)
-------
LASCO Panel Products
Condition 13 - Auxiliary Fan
Total Hydrocarbons (THC)
29-May-97
Calibration Gases
0.0 ppm
84.1 ppm
270.5 ppm
463.3 ppm
System Calibration
1.7
83.8
265.2
446.5
Calibration Error
0.20%
0.95%
Correlation 0.9999593
Slope 0.9607363
Intercept 2.8582462
15:20-16:15 Run 13-11 126.6
16:21 PostCal
Corrected 128.8 ppm THC |
3.6
270.9
Drift 0.38%
1.14%
16:37-17:37 Run 13-2^ 121.6
17:45 PostCal
Corrected 123.6 ppm THC
3.6
272.8
Drift 0.38%
1.52%
18:02-19:02 Run 13-31 126.8
19:23 PostCal
Corrected 129.0 ppm THC
1.7
274.7
Drift 0.00%
1.90%
Calibration Gases
0.0 ppm
84.1 ppm
270.5 ppm
463.3 ppm
System Calibration
-0.2
91.5
288.1
488.5
Calibration Error
1.53%
0.55%
Correlation 0.9999692
Slope 1.0535213
Intercept 1.5614987
102 ppm Styrene
143.1 ppm Styrene
250.7 ppm Styrene
20:02
259.5
307.2
423.6
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
244.8
290.1
400.6
ppm THC
ppm THC
ppm THC
Post Cat
1.7
290.0
Drift
0.38%
0.38%
Pagel
-------
p
p
n
p
R
o
p
A
N
E
450.0-
400. 8 •
358. 8
£50.0
150.8
188.8
50.0
0.8
LflSCO Panel Pro<
1.7
ducts
Systen Calibration
\
446.5
Calibration Gases
8.8 ppn
463.3 ppn
270.5 ppn
84.08 ppn
i
265.2
83.8 ;
PP«
14-58 15:00
39 May'97.14'57'80
15'02 15'04
AUXILIARY FAN
15'06
15-98
15*10
(HH'MM)
-------
p
p
M
P
R
0
P
A
N
E
eea.e
450. e
400.8
£50.9
158.0
188.0
50.0
0.8
IS
ppm
LflSCO Panel Products
Run flF-13-1 15-30 - 16'15
Mean 126.6 ppn Propane
K^j4JlK\J^AM^
20 15-30 15-40 15-50 16-00
29 Haw'97.15'28-80 AUXILIARY FAN
P
p
n
R
0
p
A
N
E
-«8.e
450.0
408.0
350.0
'flfl ft
*"
£50.0
£88.8
130.0
100.0
50.0
0A .
• V
1
LflSCO Panel Products
Systen Calibration Drift Check
Calibration Cases
0.6 pro
278.9
270.5 DC«
/ \
\
a
I
ppm
Mav'97,16'28'23
16-24
AUXILIARY FAN
16'25
16^26
(HH'MM)
P
P
N
P
R
0
P
A
-N
E
438.8
400.0
3SB.8
aee.e
£50.0
£00.0
158.0
188. 8
58. e
e.e
LASCO Panel Products
Run AF-13-2 16-37 - 17-37
,
Mean 121.6 ppn Propane
.
J^/\f\/^A^^i^^
^»-^o
16-40 16-50
89 fUg'97,16'37.00
17-00 17-10
AUXILIARY FAN
17-20
17-30
-------
P
P
N
P
R
0
P
A
N
E
458.8
408.8
358.8
388.8
£88.8
158.8
188. 8
58.8
8.8
U
LASCO Panel Products
Systen Claibraticn Drift Check
Calibration Gases
8.8 ppn
278.5 ppn
272.8
3.6
17.45 17.46
ppm 29 May'97,17.44=33
17'47
17.48 17.49
AUXILIARY FAN
17.50
17'51
(HH-MM)
P
P
n
P
R
0
P
A
N
E
588.8
450.0
400.0
358.8
388.8
£58.8
158.8
188.8
58.8
8.8
LASCO ('ahel Products
Run flF-13-3 18.82-19.82
Mean 126.8 ppn Propane
18.18
ppn 29 May'97,18.02'88
18-20
18.38 18^40
AUXILIARY FAN
18-50
19'88
(HH-nri)
p
p
N
P
R
0
P
A
N
E
458.0
488.8
cse.e
380.8
£50.8
£88.8
158.8
188. 8
58.8
8.8
ppn
i
LASCO Panel Products
Systen Calibration Drift Check
Calibration Cases
8.8 ppn
278.5 ppn
1.7
274.7
19-23 19-24 19-85 19-26 19-27 19-28 19-29 19-38 19>31
29 n«v'97.i9-22.ae AUXILIARY FAN ,-. m>
-------
P
p
n
p
R
o
p
A
N
E
450.0
400.0
350.0
380.0
£50.0
£00.0
150.0
100.0
50.0
0A
• u
-0.2
488.5
I]
LftSCO Panel Products
Calibration Cases
0.0 ppn
463.3 ppn
270.5 ppn
v 84.08 ppn
288.1
V
91.5 \
\.
l_
ppn
19'32 19'33
29 May'97.19'31'14
19'34
19'35 19'36
AUXILIARY FAN
19-37
19'38
19'39 19-40
P
P
n
p
R
o
p
A
N
E
450.0
400.0
350.0
380.0
£50.0
£00.0
150. 0
100.0
50.0
0.0
I
LASCO Panel Products
, 250.7 ppn Styrcne
Calibration of Styrene Cylinder Standards A
1 423.6
143.1 ppn Styr*n* /
102 ppn Styrene S~ _0, .,
[ 307'2
N - ^9.5 If
i
ppn
19'46 19'48
29 May'97.19'45'25
19'50 19'52
AUXILIARY FAN
19'54
19'56
ee 20-03
ppn 29 Mav'97,28'01'34
20-04 20-05
AUXILIARY FAN
20-86
20-07
3*1
-------
3 a a cz3
DAILY CEM CALIBRATION AND PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
Plant:
Location:
Date: 5- 2q -
Parameter: SO2, CO2, 02,
Monitor: (35pm>r%
Span Value: 100
Operator: P^
Project #:
Chart Scale: o-/ono
rr
Pbar, in. Hg.: 2
Time, Pretest: 14:45 Post-test: H;I^ Ambient Temp., F:
Run #
Cyl.
#
Cal. Gaa
-Cpnc.,
(pprpor%
o
270. S
4U%.?>
BftU.-7
Calibrations (Chart Divisions)
I 45.fe 4
*1.5
Concentration Predicted
By Equation*
»4:4^ iutz< n:^4S rt'.iS
I.Ub I.T i."l \-~l
2^0.l
4W0.4 ^<.4 ^/54.^ W50.S
ft*ft.3
Analyzer
Calibration
Error,"
% of Span
o, I -=,
o.t»%
DrHt,"-
% of Span
c».o
1.0
* Perform linear regression of pretest cal. gas concentration vs. chart divisions to
determine the following equation:
y *» mx + b x = ppm y = chart divisions
For Data Reduction:
Pollutant, ppm/'/o = (Chart Division - b) = _JCD4o,f (ry)
m
)
Correlation Coefficient =
Analyzer cal. error, % cal. gas value (Cal. gas cone.-cone, predicted) x 100
Cal. gas value, ppm
Acceptable limit = < 2% of calibration gas value (< 5% for THC)
***
Drift, % Span =
(Post-test cal. response - initial cal. response) x 100
Span value
Acceptable limit < 3% of span
Minimum detectable limit = 2% of span or ppm or % (cirde one)
Maximum zero drift = % of span or ppm or % (cirde one)
; Maximum calibration drift » % of span or ppm or % (drde one)
COMMENTS: Pretest or post-test (drde one) calibration used to quantitate
sample data. Post-test is used if drift exceeds limits and if post-test:
yields higher concentration
TO. .
-------
3-9GL.E3
= GEM DATA REDUCTION - BAG ANALYSIS OR STEADY READINGS
Plant:
Parameter: SO2, C02. O2.
Location: MA»K! P^V^^T Operator: P3s£-&£L-
Date: •? -^~ 4~| Project #: , fV05 - OQ2>
Pollutant, ppm/%
Run
#
H\e-rb-|
HE-l-b-2.
Me-rs-?,
Time"*
(24-Hr)
l5'2-o-,S:30
• «*-%)
- 15:^0
~ ' t-.no
-1U 10
-U>,4&-
Ib-.ST-IU'.^-y
-7^:57
-n'.o-i
~n:n
-n:->-i
-/-7.-r^7
Jft'o-i- .^'.p^
~lft'-' "*-
~l&'.*7
-IA.-47
~tft'*?
-i4:cn.
(Chart Division - b) _ (CD4-o,n/))
m (0. ioo1-*> )
Average
Chart
Division
M
20
ZO
tf
tf
/f
/B
n,s
/A
/8
l&
/&
/8.<
/8.^
/4.4
;4.
J4
/7
Concentration
//>/v
/&19
/41.8
/W &
/833
/8flfl
/W3
/8o.o
ns o
/ao.o
/&O.O
t&o.o
/BO. O
/&4.1
/843
144 B
/Stf 3
/B3.4
/7A,I
Comments
~Vw.m 5"
AUfr-=. /^5.2/?/^/feyn
r*^ /f^-^^/Mr^K
A.V6. = /7f > 2 /aa»/ /fe^uu
ai2 — f rr /pri i nfj
-
AV6= J8£. & rt**k
1 ^ tv*iVff — a
^C€-
Vp**&
* For NOX Indicate whether NO, NO + NO2, or NO2 for specific interval.
** IK2SLIl!tltlhertlme interval»» from beginning of first time to beginning
or second time or to end of second time (circle one, or describe alternate).
Calculated By:
Checked By:
Date:
-------
.= = DAILY CEM CALIBRATION AND PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
Plant:
Location:
Date:
Parameter: SO2, CO2, QZ,
Monitor:
Operator: ;
Project #:
Time, Pretest:
Span Value: 100
Chan Scale: <4
Pbar, in. Hg.: j?
-------
GEM DATA REDUCTION - BAG ANALYSIS OR STEADY READINGS
Plan':
L°Cati°n:
Date:
Parameter: SO2, C02, Q2,
Operator: P.
Projea #:
S .
Pollutant, ppm/% = (Chart Division - b) = (CD-|.8to)
m (a./422-A)
Run
RE-rb-\
D C — i*^. ^
rN.t» 1 _T — .^
RE-13,-3
Time**
(24-Hr)
lV.2.o-,<=^r
-'*'4fl
-'Il?:^f
-ifci/)
/^
lt,'.^n-iu.-4-?
-iu:«q
-11:07
_ -IT. 1-7
-IT '7
I8-.OT.-I ft' 17.
-1 ft'. 7.7.
-1 *.*,!_
^™ 1 Q. * " ^
-/4.y#
Average
Chan
Division
2Z
21
) 2^?. 5
-2.1
J/
~J/ ^
•2.1
2, / <^
22.
2Z
2.2 5
2.-2L
•2 1
11
22.
225
^2 5
^5-
Concentration
.^^y/^7
/^ <9
&& &
Comments
:31 2.
w a
w a
/t>3 4-
W A
IO-L 4
tos.o
^
/os.o
/a
ess — ^ — ^/^^ rfeP
//)V / /^
/y* tiQflf1'
. /0, 7 /£
* For NOX Indicate whether NO, NO + NO2 , or NO2 for specific interval.
"
Indicate whether time interval is from beginning of first time to beginning
or second time or to end of second time (circle one, or describe alternate).
Calculated By:.
Checked By:.
Data;
-------
DAILY CEM CALIBRATION AND PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
Plant:
Parameter: SOe, CO2, 02,
Location: AU^IL-IAR_V/ PAM Monitor: ^5prrT)3r %
Date:
5-?3-*?7' Span Value: 100
Operator: P, ^\?^\_ Chart Scale: /)-•&>& p*™ Propane
Project #: S4&5.0&*. Pbar, in. Ha.: 21. 10 '
Time, Pretest: is- oo Post-test: I4:i£ Ambient Temp., P\ to€»0f
Cyl.
Run #: J
^F-i^-l .A.F-13,-2. r\F-i>>-^
Cal. Gas
Cone.,
(fJprinjDr %
0
_S4.o&
2~7O.^>
4fe?>.^
Calibrations (Chart Oh/isions)
IS.'Otolto'.zO \T.4f> 14 '2S
O.O 0. b rt.3 rt . I
Ib.*?
Concentration Predicted
By Equation*
-Z.I /. /) -a.s -/,'^>
AC..-I
51. a «a« 54 D S4.8 in2 ^ J?7« 0 21B.'=> 282.7
a^.-i
4t7.o
>'
Analyzer
Calibration
Error."*
% of Span
/. ?3
D.kH
Drift"*
% of Span
Z).4>
2.6
* Perform linear regression of pretest cal. gas concentration vs. chart divisions to
determine the following equation:
y « mx + b x = ppm y = chart divisions
For Data Reduction:
»«.-.„-.«- (ChanDivision.b) _ _JO>.ft.
Correlation Coefficient =
m
A
)
Analyzer cal. error, % cal. gas value =
(Cal. gas cone. - cone, predicted) x 100
Cal. gas value, ppm
Acceptable limit = < 2% of calibration gas value (< 5% for THC)
***
Drift, % Span
(Post-test cal. response - initial cal. response) x 100
Span value
Acceptable limit < 3% of span
Minimum detectable limit» 2% of span or ppm or % (circle one)
Maximum zero drift = % of span or ppm or % (drde one)
Maximum calibration drift = % of span or ppm or % (drde one)
COMMENTS: Pretest or post-test (drde one) calibration used to quantitate
sample data. Post-test is used if drift exceeds limits and if post-test
-yields higher concentration
.
-------
- GEM DATA REDUCTION - BAG ANALYSIS OR STEADY READINGS
Plant:
Location: Ai*»
Date:
Parameter: SO2, CO2. Q2,
Operator:
Project #:
CO
p.
Pollutant, ppm/% = (Chart Division'
m
(CD -
Run
#
AF-i-s-l
AF-13-2
rNF-«3>-,^
Time**
(24-Hr)
15:2.0 - /5-'3C>
| t^ * -^ «^k i ^ < .1 ^
•"in/ no
-/S'se
-/t>:OD
-/A: /^
x^
-tL:t&
1^.1-7 -IL' 4-1
-/t,:^1
-n'.m
-/T./7
-/7.'?T
-/-7:r^7
/B'.07.-IA'.I7-
-l&m_
-/am
-/&:4Z
-fK'.^l
-rtio-L
Average
Chan
Division
~?S
34
^5
24
2L
23
2?>
"2.-2>
Z^
24
z£
?.4
23
23
2^
^5-
J?<
25
Concentration
/>/""
/J7.A
/22.^
//7-4
/22.k
/33.O
//7 4-
in.4
1(7.4
/2Z.4*
/2Z.4>
/27.g
/2Z fo
inA
/n.4
/^2,^
A27.8
/^7. ^
131. &
Comments
JlxrA 4
AM^"=- /-^T, ^"/,/j/^ i^la
AM6»- /2/."7 P/3A1 rro/JAJ
' 1
.
A.V6»= /^^ . ^ />/y»f //
^
* For NOX Indicate whether NO, NO + NO2, or NO2 for specific interval.
** IKS? !?iether time interval ls from beginning of first time to beginning
or second time or to end of second time (cirde one, or describe alternate).
Calculated By:
Checked By:_
'-24-37
nntn.
-------
APPENDIX A.2.15
Conditions 1-13 Method 25A Strip Charts
-------
EXHAUST...!.CilRtcr
I I
i is
-i _____ i---
-I
-j . ...< ........ I fr70ff.flrt.-4.
—|-
-------
I ! £
U.VJUM.
t "
tt_l_
^_
1 j
i !
i :
1
i
j
:
'
1
1
i
i
i
L_ • 1
ii
i
i
,
' . . ; :
** i ;
-------
1 J j
' &TVHJU4t SrmMttU& ^ *?
1 | ' ! • ! ' 1 ' •
i i | i ;
: i i 1 i i
1 /02lflOBM
: 1 ' -w *| rP1*1
' SKX*-«- i^-Awi
_^syii-i. .iii.n™.
i
I
•
j
*
0-— 1 --2-- -3
-------
o-l^t-
OT
,
••SOI
£L
5
i i
27kti
SK/T7
1
j foild
; ;
1 i !
/tola/
i i l~~ Z~
I : : /St'5t).
^
•
i i
i
i
i i
\ i
£*- /Af/v
'"3- . ,
*»? , /&.oi>
*f"
-<_ :
-------
t
_j Svyprg>A, Q.tk.LtMtA'yiotV g /^i
^g^.oi
•?,
:( 270.5-
1
^Mar? r.vHHi^^f
'.V
-£?fe«r
11
J41ll|.7^=:
' !
mr/wv\
T~n
=jHua_.J
-------
-------
-------
IM.66
I
4-
nurr
m
^\
-------
/«'.'"•< ia
I 7 _ C_ K . 1
•—T ' « » »-i. _r?
-1/5<256
i' ..... "T?~"i ; i : "
-------
T57TK5
. 1 1 i 1 :
\
-ataajf
no-
2£'&^» "i i-?^. i : i i i 1 i
_4 j_^^_trsD^__4_j_H 4 4 -
1 ..:_!.. L 3^ ."3
! ^za.'45 *-i--'^' |i
i !<: u
;. - i^°:^ i ; i ,
M^ t | t ' ,
I1-*' liO-2>5 I 1 :
', , . I | '
• I
• I
i
/4,"i/
loi 1 •
L '•*'
i
:
' '
.
1
,
! i /?'^ o
1 ' _;.
i i r
77n.# •
: I [4KA.fr ~~
_,._iJ | :
4U1A '
! l
-------
ii/ffiar
J
i
1
ft-
i^f
AT
H-—t-- --1—^ H-
•9:i\
1
j
* i
1 i
1
i
1 ' ;
:V^ CM.,**
i
i ' I ; i •
: i i
: 1 ' ' •
, 270,5 /»/»m
VT i brJ
0
! i
• " r ™ "i i
< • i
1 J O-jl /i&
^-4-
o'
1 !MADE
' i : 1 •
i ! i
1 ! •• 1 ' | l
1M JiAF^fi
i ;
• \ i
i ! ! ;
| i ; ;
i
: j : j ' I i 1 :
-------
Tt
r
*J
oiMcr-
•73737
1 . ! . !
JiE=&
i
-I j t (•-
-H--
rf
r r-
• '•••-J-
. .. j
75.30
4—
M p.
f^H1—P^
^
-------
i; i 111 .
4./A&>
/1/
;?a.*77
.J..
FAX
'-~J-
84,0$
.5
1 :
1
1
1 1
:
~- yalt:/*r c~At.ro^fni7c*lt
: i I i
; 1 1 1
' ^ ?~74 -1 AAnv i
• ' • L.44»"Va» frrtM ......; — ... _ . .. ...r* . ._ ._ _.....
j— ' >? '
1 o 1
!
^J
; r^ : v
/ O^I Aaw
t -
t£
-------
III!
I • i i
i SO
\llVtll
_L
23'-
2.3MOT
-*..
_l I
; j...
.1
~\
jo;
22!
IO A>/
-i- --t
4 }..._.
-H)
-A
.ib-l
,0
L-
AlJL
i
~Z\'W
±3rt
).'T7'
I e*
iif*\i *iMfn
-------
-f
'A*
•h
270, &
—(_
\-
_o
5 4..
3 -2
'270.5
i i
a.
T
O°! 3O i
J L_i i 1
^4
i 00:00:—-I
3(5
-------
(
i 4_^,..J^,.^
:X5V-25-
/5//51
r — •
•/S-:oS-
lA.0A/
\ —
J-AfJ
/-f'35;
i—a~
-l-: \-
T
! _i !___„
I
JL:.
-------
UlSOM
&-jo;$-\
<2xt./£>AATfOtJ
1.
i AUXILIARY.. E4*J
iL^-' K'U
1—
e
-3-3
17:35
JQJ
27P.6
L
D &fm
-ft
-------
i
1
.eAflArriQfc
I
f : ? > 1
-^ 4-
f'
iO-
yp_
•!
-------
4..»3Wft-&«H**-i
•4- i I •••!
..._u
__:_..4_.L...
-i—
-------
-
' 1 :
1
: i • I 1
: i 1
' 1 ' ! I '
' 1 • 1 1
¥
J
10-
\ i • 1 •
| ! i i 1 !
i • >-l. *• :
i ' :
1 i i
i i
• i • ,
! ! i
i i i
| :
: g 4 h-
i
~T
-------
1 I !
__:.r
101
i
i i
i i
-5
I :-
i i "~ — ; — rtr
i !
1 1 ' ,• •
i • i 1 L '
^n —
i i i
' ! : 1 •
: j !:"'•!
i ! ! • 1 i i : !
-------
' ' /
1 i ':
( : «... .
:
i i '
2
**•>. £&»*•*. ' 1 i ' : '•
• • 1 • "I I ' i • i . i.
1 . ' '
1 ' ! i ' i
17^.5 • ' ! . . i ! :
Hli.v ;. I i
• ;
; >
F
270.5
-r-
—^— (..
I0«-
:;z;:-:^:r
..p.
-------
IO-.VA LflD^MA
•Lt9f(4
f^l -4 9 - • -10
-------
i i , 1 1
• I : 1 >
J • i • -i '
if* «au
>&y* 7
j
.
i :
: , o-
i ;
1
T?-^
-------
' 1) 1 1 i
• i i i i
; ; j ;
twltom
,
1
L < .
i
;
-------
JO
.___z_t^
i-F
6»b.7T
I !
i —
I
3
g g
*i
-------
-------
4
-e
-c
j^ i 1 ' ,
F~r/T.'5/!
— - /•*:*//
i
, *
: I
: i
1
; ' i
i
; i 4
i
i
q ;
r
/Ifal—5-
r~"^0l
w?--:
-------
3
78
J J[Q-
l i
: L
^v«t
UnBOcfl
.._!____ •_ j_ •• '•
-------
-------
J J
Imtte
•! -.*- -
-------
cr
Till -LU.
ri^?!!
rn
T0*v.-r^£
*=fa~ . ..I
—: /fc.-fro
(£*>M.
111111
n
£12?
s
—\.
w^
t
to
H^-
111
73:20
/2.VO
--i-
M:S\O
" i - <^L
: i | ' •
1 \" |
! _ i i .J
i.J 110.5 ff-^ i 0
^" .'...Li. J —
-------
4
;•«»«*.
i i
Jrte.
OM
"3
-P
Tild
TltJI
'K
;r.6i
5hiMcr..
ME-M.-
.r
ff«r-rf
4 9 «)-
•5^""
' . .1^7 ._
c--r"'
/8}«fc i ^r.^
! i [2 <
\/6*¥$ -^
i '.' ":°*
1 ' '
J L ^tCi
1 . 1
i ... r*;a'-y5
..._. L...-I. '
•
i i
r ' T ; ' P •
i ; . !
!
!
i
! 1
-------
,.
w-
fp*k
T±
-,r
__ Kexlm
i j ..i.. _.
7*IOoi
-vn
_4_ _._j| L ^ j A :.
I i ' I 1 '
0_:-J .
1 C™~™ "2.0
-rrV
-------
lo- ...i)
B- :—7— 6»-- —5—- --4-
[.„
-------
*• '• !•» 1 •• 1 <•- .
; L_± . __.i ___
i DlM&T
i •' !
1 ! ; !• •
! : ' i i
;• : ! i
! • ' ! ' i
j - 1 i ! !
tjm/Uim L. L : L. I :
r : f i r i i : r :
III'.
i ! i
i ; :
'- ' ' i
i ;
III ; !
i » i A
, f f : I ?'
-------
CH
i ; ."• i -270p-— ; -,-
! . : ; • ! • i i i
: • ,
i ' 1 3 i ' i i 1 ' 1 ' '
I • • • ! /4«'6Z —— "^
; \j
t J
-------
-------
/jjoy
-tip*
3
;-}i
• i •
j//i#,
7W
-M-i::
YAM*
'
-------
_ ,£. (W> v
J
-I
$ 4_lWV?-i 2— -I 0- ^
4L
il'O
I-
-
..4—
fa ' 7
tzl
-------
/*:ca —
*'-
''
i
?"'"**
.5. t—.
4 -i—
MO
j-Ui
L>
>— n:n
i tui
W?
—i
_4
*T_-
->^
io ' ' D
t
^—/iW
/AI/Q ;
: j-
-fcttet-
^-
. t^^m m*jn
I /» * 9O
if
-------
33:
r
,-
..no,s__
T : J
-3
- •(-•=
..L_L
ol
-------
APPENDIX A.2.16
Oven Nos. 9 and 10 Method 25A Data
-------
Project ID: 97-14?? Date: 05-14-1997 Start Time: 10:34 : 33
Client: LASCO Test Location: TTE
1 Min. Averages Condition 1 Run number 1
Time Open 10 Open 9 NDO C NDO A NDO B
ppm %/ppm %/ppm %/ppm %/ppm
10:35:39
10:36:39
10:37:39
10:38:39
10:39:39
10:40:39
10:41:39
10:42:39
10:43:39
10:44:39
10:45:39
10:46:39
10:47:39
10:48:39
10:49:39
10:50 :39
10:51:39
10:52:39
10:53:39
10:54:39
10:55:39
10:56:39
10:57:39
10:58:39
10:59:39
11:00:39
11:01:39
11:02:39
11:03:39
11:04:39
11:05:39
11:06:39
11:07:39
11:08:39
11:09:39
11:10:39
11:11:39
11:12:39
11:13:39
11:14:39
11:15:3.9
11:16:39
11:17:39
43
44.4
43.8
43.3
44
42.7
41.6
41.3
42.1
42.1
42
43
43.8
44.2
42.5
40.9
40
40.1
40.7
40
40.1
41
42
42.8
43.2
42.7
42.4
42.9
43
43
42.2
40.6
41.2
40.4
39.8
40.1
41.1
42.2
40.8
40.6
42
43
43.3
35.5
30.7
28.5
27.1
26.2
25.9
27.7
35.3
51.8
63 .9
75.7
92.1
110 In
122.5
129.6
135.2
136.6
138.4
141
145.6
142.6 In
136.5
133.4
132.6
137.6
138.4
142.8
136.8
129.6
129.3
131.7 In
137.9
131.8
133.1
133.6
138.5
142.1
144.4
142.6
136.5
138.4 In
139.2
139.5
Transition
17.1
17.3
16.4
15
20
15.8
16.5
Transition
Transition
13.9
14.2
14.2
16.6
14.3
16.2
14.2
16
17.2
Transition
6.5
7
6.7
6.7
7.2
6.8
7
6.6
6.1
5.8
6
6.1
(not any one
(not any one
5.9
5.4
5.2
5.9
5.9
6.1
6.3
6.1
6
(not any one
(not any one
4.3
4,5
specific ND
specific ND
specific ND
specific ND
-------
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
:18
:19
:20
:21
:22
:23
:24
:25
:26
:27
:28
:29
:30
:31
:32
:33
:34
:39
:39
:39
:39
:39
:39
:39
:39
:39
:39
:39
:39
:39
:39
:39
:39
:39
44
45
46
46
47
47
47
47
47
47
47
48
49
48
47
.2
.2
.4
.8
.6
.7
.6
.8
48
.2
.2
.8
.8
.2
.7
.2
46
136
138
142
142
140
143
143
140
136
140
139
139
140
140
.3
.3
.8
.1
.3
.4
.5
.7 In
.7
.9
.4
.3
.3
.8
144
146
136
.9
.4
4.6
, 5.5
; 6.3
6.6
6.5 ;
6.8
6.5
Transition (not any one specific ND
16.3
17
15
15
15
16
14
17
.8
.7
.9
.2
.9
.6
.4
13
Run avgs. 43.5 118.7 .15.9 '6.1 Not Run
-------
Project ID: 97-3020 Date: 05-14-1997 Start Time: 12:25:43
Client: LASCO Test Location: TTE
I Win. Averages Condition 1 Run number 2
Time Open 10 Open 9 NDO C NDO A NDO B
ppm %/ppm %/ppm %/ppm %/ppm
12:26:49
12:27:49
12:28:49
12:29:49
12:30:49
12:31:49
12:32:49
12:33 :49
12:34 :49
12:35:49
12:36:49
12:37:49
12:38:49
12:39:49
12:40:49
12:41:49
12:42 :49
12:43:49
12:44:49
12:45:49
12:46:49
12:47:49
12:48:49
12:49:49
12:50:49
12:51:49
12:52:49
12:53:49
12:54:49
12:55:49
12:56:49
12:57:49
12:58:49
12:59:49
13:00:49
13:01:49
13:02:49
13:03:49
13:04:49
13:05:49
13:06:49
13:07:49
13:08:49
43.2
44.1
44.8
44.9
44.2
44.6
44.9
44.2
43.3
43.1
43.4
43.1
43.3
42.9
43.1
43.5
43 .6
43.5
42.7
42
41.7
41.4
41
41.7
42.1
42.4
41.9
39.8
38.2
37.8
38.4
39.5
41
41.7
40.4
39.7
40.8
42.3
43
42.7
41.2
39.7
40.3
140.3
135
134.7
138.5
132.5
135.3
140.1
140.6
142.4
136.9
125.1 In Transition
124.5
127.2
133 .9
131.3
133.4
133 .2
131.7
135.8
134.6
133.3 In Transition
125.7
126.1
132.6
131.1
124.2
118.5
125.7
132.8
136.8
128
119.1
122.1
131.7
131.8
126.7
130.2
139.9
139.8
136.8
135 In Transition
134.4
125.9
(not any
4.7
4 .9
5.3
5.5
5.6
5.8
5.7
6
6.9
(not any
6.1
3.9
4.1
3.6
4.1
4.9
5.5
5.4
(not any
61.8
61.4
61.6
57
53.3
62.5
56.4
55.9
55
67.5
one specific ND
one specific ND
55.9
57.5
60.4
55.7
57
52.8
51.9
53.4
50.1
56.1
54.8
one specific ND
53.7
53.3
-------
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
•
:
:
:
:
:
09
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
:49
:49
:49
:49
:49
:49
:49
:49
:49
:49
:49
:49
:49
:49
:49
:49
:49
40
39
39
38
38
39
39
40
39
40
42
44
44
44
.4
.8
39
39
.7
.8
.2
.2
.7
.1
.9
.8
.1
.1
.6
.1
44
131
127
120
125
131
139
141
1
136
137
135
133
131
135
136
129
133
.5
.1
.5
.8
.2
.6
.9
37
.5
.2
.4
.6
.8
.1
.8
.4
.1
6
5
5
4
4
4
4
4
3
, 3
.6
.8
.2
.3
.1
.3
.5
.5
.7
.6
62
63
60
65
62
57
61
.7
.5
.5
.1 (
.1 ;. .
.4
.6
Run avgs. 41.7 132.3 Not Run 5.0 57.9
-------
Project ID: 97-14?? Date: 05-14-1997 Start Time: 15:46:23
Client: LASCO Test Location: TTE
1 Min. Averages Condition 1 Run number 3
Time Open 10 Open 9 NDO C NDO A NDO B
ppm %/ppm. %/ppm %/ppm %/ppm
15:47:29
15:48:29
15:49:29
15:50:29
15:51:29
15:52:29
15:53:29
15:54:29
15:55:29
15:56:29
15:57:29
15:58:29
15:59:29
16:00:29
16:01:29
16 -.02:29
16:03:29
16:04:29
16:05:29
16:06:29
16:07:29
16:08:29
16:09:29
16:10:29
16:11:29
16:12:29
16:13:29
16:14:29
16:15:29
16:16:29
16:17:29
16:18:29
16:19:29
16:20:29
16:21:29
16:22:29
16:23:29
16:24:29
16:25:29
16:26:29
16:27:29
16:28:29
16:29:29
47.7
48.8
47.7
47.9
48.1
48.6
48.6
48.7
47.7
47.4
48.3
49.4
49
47.5
46.8
45.4
45.2
45
45.2
44.3
44.1
43.9
43.2
41.3
40.3
39.9
38.4
37.8
38.9
40.1
40.6
40.5
39.8
37.4
35.9
36.2
35.6
35
35.5
36.4
35.3
33.6
32.8
148.3
141
132.3
135.9
138.3
132.9
137.8
140.5
139.4
137.1
135.6
137.4
139 In
141.6
140.4
136.7
138.6
141.1
133.8
128
125.2 In
126.9
127.7
124.5
122.9
124.3
125.9
133.5
133.4
130.6
128.8
128.2 In
128.4
127.3
133.4
135.2
131.9
129.7
128.4
123.6
127.5
124.6
121.3
Transition
Transition
6
4.3
3 .8
3.8
3.4
3.1
2.9
2.7
2.3
4.4
Transition
2.6
2.3
(not any
10.2
10
10
8.7
7.6
8.7
8.7
(not any
(not any
7.1
6.3
6.2
6.4
6.6
7.3
6
5.6
5.7
78.8
63.6
73.8
63.4
66.2
67.5
68.2
66.8
73
68.6
69.1
67.5
one specific ND
one specific ND
one specific ND
•V3.4
-------
16:
16:
16:
16:
16:
16:
16:
16:
16:
16:
16:
16:
16:
16:
16:
16:
16:
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
:29
:29
:29
:29
:29
:29
:29
:29
:29
:29
:29
:29
:29
:29
:29
:29
:29
33
33
33
32
32
31
30
30
31
31
31
30
29
30
31
32
.2
.4
.2
.9
.3
.6
.9
.9
.4
.9
32
.5
.7
.6
.8
.8
.4
114
115
113
110
109
114
113
118
123
132
132
126
118
112
113
110
113
.7
.8
.8
.9
.2
.1
.8
.2 In
.4 In
.6
.7
.8
.8
.6
.4
.8
.2
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
Tran
Tran
.3
.2
.1
.1
.1
.1
.7
sition
sition
(not
(not
5.
5.
4.
4.
8.
4.
any one
any one
9
2
9
7
5
5
5
8
v
1
;•
specific ND
specific ND
•
>.
Run avgs. 39.5 128.2 3.0 '"6.9 68.9
-------
Project ID: 97-14?? Date: 05-14-1997 Start Time: 20:20:19
Client: LASCO Test Location: TTE
1 Min. Averages Condition 2 Run 1
Time Open 10 Open 9 NDO C NDO A NDO B
ppm %/ppm %/ppm %/ppm %/ppm
20:21:
20:22:
20:23:
20:24:
20:25:
20:26:
20:27:
20:28:
20:29:
20:30:
20:31:
20:32:
20:3-3:
20:34:
20:35:
20:36:
20:37:
20:38:
20:39
20:40
20:41
20:42
20:43
20:44
20:45
20:46
20:47
20:48
20:49
20:50
20:51
20:52
20:53
20:54
20:55
20:56
20:57
20:58
20:59
21:00
21i-01
21:03
21:04
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
:25
:25
:25
:25
:25
:25
:25
:25
:25
:25
:25
:25
:25
:25
:25
:25
:25
:25
:25
:25
:36
:36
:36
:36
:36
:36
:36
:36
:12
:12
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
NO
NO
4
43.
43.
42.
43.
44.
45.
45.
45.
46.
46.
47.
48.
Data
Data
Data
Data
Data
Data
Data
Data
Data
Data
Data
Data
Data
Data
Data
Data
Data
Data
Data
Data
38
37
38
40
40
42
44
4
9
3
8
3
8
1
3
6
3
8
8
1
NO
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
NO
NO
No
NO
NO
.3
.8
.8
.6
.3
41
.2
43
.6
45
95.
10
106.
105.
107.
112.
113.
118.
116.
107.
10
10
109.
Data
Data
Data
Data
Data
Data
Data
Data
Data
Data
Data
Data
Data
Data
Data
Data
Data
Data
Data
Data
67
36
25
25
25
23
22
21
21
7
1
4
8
4
9
2
2
6
9
4
9
5
No
No
No
NO
No
No
NO
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
NO
NO
No
No
NO
No
.3
.1
.6
.1
.2
.7
.4
.7
.2
21
2.
1.
Data
Data
Data
Data
Data
Data
Data
Data
Data
Data
Data
Data
Data
Data
Data
Data
Data
Data
Data
Data
-. 1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
4
9
No
No
No
NO
No
No
NO
NO
No
NO
NO
No
NO
NO
No
NO
No
No
NO
No
.9
.7
.7
.7
.2
.2
.2
1
.6
.1
6
6.2
6.1
6.2
5.8
5.S
5.6
6.2
6
5.S
€
Data
Data
Data
Data
Data
Data
Data
Data
Data
Data
Data
Data
Data
Data
Data
Data
Data
Data
Data
Data
i
i
i
)
No
No
No
NO
No
No
NO
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
NO
Data
Data
Data
Data
Data
Data
Data
Data
Data
Data
Data
Data
Data
Data
Data
Data
Data
Data
Data
Data
-------
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
:
:
:
:
:
:
;
:
•
:
•
^
j
j
;
:
:
:
;
:
:
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
:12
:12
:12
:12
:12
:12
:12
:12
:12
:12
:12
:12
:12
:12
:12
:12
:12
:12
:1:2
:12
:12
46
45
44
44
43
42
41
41
42
44
44
43
43
43
42
42
42
42
44
.3
.9
.9
.6
.8
.6
.1
.4
.8
.3
.2
.9
.8
44
.7
.5
.2
.4
.6
44
.3
21
21
26
23
21
20
8
26
24
23
30
29
33
31
29
27
24
23
23
.1 In
.5 In
.1
.3
.8
.9
.6
.6
.1
.5
.3
.4
.6
.1
.4
.6
26
.8
.3
.9
24
Trans
Trans
.
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
- • 1
1
1
sition
sition
.9
.7
.7
.4
.6
.6
.8
.4
.7
.6
L (no
L (no
8
6
5
5
4
4
4
3
t any one specific ND
t any one specific ND
.6
.7
.2
. 4
5
.9
.6
.5
.6
Run avgs. 43.5 50.4 1.6 5.7 Not Run
-------
Project ID: 97-14?? Date: 05-14-1997 Start Time: 21:55:18
Client: Lasco Test Location:
1 Min. Averages Condition 2 Run number 2
Time Open 10 Open 9 NDO C NDO A NDO B
ppm %/ppm %/ppm %/ppm %/ppm
21:56:24
21:57:24
21:58:24
21:59:24
22:00:24
22:01:24
22:02:24
22:03 :24
22:04:24
22:05:24
22:06:24
22:07:24
22:08:24 .
22:09:24
22:10:24
22:11:24
22 :12 :24
22:13:24
22:14:24
22:15:24
22:16:24
22:17:24
22:18:24
22:19:24
22:20:24
22:21:24
22:22:24
22:23:24
22:24:24
22:25:24
22:26:24
22:27:24
22:28:24
22:29:24
22:30:24
22:31:24
22:32:24
22:33:24
22:34:24
22:35:24
22:36:24
22:37:24
22:38:24
36.2
36.5
36.4
35.8
35.2
35.5
35.8
35.7
36.1
36.1
36
35.8
35.9
• 36.3
37
36.7
35.5
35.2
35.1
35.8
36.4
37.2
38
37.4
36.9
37
37.3
37.6
37
37.7
38.8
40.1
40.1
39.8
39.3
38.1
38
38.8
39
38.8
39.3
39.9
39.9
65.4
68.9
70.5
70.2
71.6
67.2
70.9
65.9
66
67.9
66.7 In
65.5
62.7
65.9
64.9
66 .8
66.4
66.3
68.8
70.2
70.7
70.3
72.4 In
69.3 In
83
80.8
78.4
71.8
71.3
71.3
67.6
71.9
71.8
72.8 In
66.7
66.1
65.2
69.8
69.5
68.2
64.6
68.6
66.6
Transition
3.2
2.4
2.7
3.2
3 .2
3.6
3.2
2.7
2.8
3.8
3.6
Transition
Transition
Transition
2.6
2.6
2.9
2.9
3.3
2.6
3.3
2.7
2.6
17.9
17.6
6.8
3.8
3.4
2.9
3
2.7
(not any one
(not any one
(not any one
4.6
3.4
3.5
3.3
3.1
3.1
3.1
2.6
2.8
(not any one
3.8
3.7
specific ND
specific ND
specific ND
specific ND
-------
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
:39
:40
:41
:42
:43
:44
:45
:46
:47
:48
:49
:50
:51
:52
:53
:54
:55
:24
:24
:24
:24
:24
:24
:24
:24
:24
:24
:24
:24
:24
:24
:24
:24
:24
38
39
40
40
39
40
40
41
41
41
39
40
40
41
.8
.4
.4
.4
.5
.5
.8
.3
41
.4
.1
40
.9
.2
41
.7
.3
67
67
67
67
66
64
67
65
70
74
83
97
99
104
1
.6
.4
.6
.7
65
.4
.9
.1,
.7
.7
.5
.3
96
.7
.8
.6
09
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
.9
.9
.8
.6
.7
.7
.8
.8
.7
.7
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
.5
.9
•5
.8
.7
.8
.9
Run avgs. 38.1 71.9 : 2.9 4.5 Not Run
-------
Project ID: 97-14?? Date: 05-14-1997 Start Time: 23:37:56
Client: Lasco Test Location:
1 Min. Averages Condition 2 Run number 3
Tim<
23:
23:
23:
23:
23:
23:
23:
23 :
23:
23:
23 :
23:
23:
23:
23:
23 :
23:
23:
23:
23:
23:
00:
00:
00:
00:
00:
00:
00:
00:
00:
00:
00:
00:
00:
00:
00:
00:
00:
00:
00:
00:
00:
00:
a
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
00
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
Op
p;
:02
:02
:02
:02
:02
:02
:02
:02
:02
:02
:02
:02
:02
:02
:02
:02
:02
:02
:02
:02
:02
:02
:02
:02
:02
:02
:02
:02
:02
:02
:02
:02
:02
:02
:02
:02
:02
:02
:02
:02
:02
:02
:02
en 10
pm
35,
35,
36,
36
35
35
35
34
34
34
35
36
35
35
35
36
35
34
33
33
33
33
32
32
32
31
30
31
32
32
31
31
31
31
32
33
33
33
33
Opi
%/;
.8
.6
.6
.1
.6
.2
.1
35
.4
.6
.4
.2
.2
.9
.4
.2
36
.2
.5
.8
.8
.4
.3
.1
.4
.8
.1
.1
.9
.5
32
.3
32
.1
.6
.6
.7
.3
.3
.3
.2
.9
.9
en 9
ppm
90,
92,
94,
104
110
113
113
112
111
104
106
107
106
108
112
112
117
117
112
110
108
1
108
113
105
110
112
111
113
.108
107
1
103
110
1
111
115
111
103
97
96
93
97
NDO C NDO j
%/ppm %/ppi
.4 9.7
.8 9.1
.8 8.5
.1 7.3
.4 7.7
.5 7.6
.4 7.6
.8 7
.4 7.2
.3 7.2
. 1 In Transition
.2
.9
• 1
.9
. 1
.7
.1
.2
.4
. 9 In Transition
04
.1
.5
.2
.2
.9
.4
.1
.5
.4 In Transition
07
.3
.3
11
.5
.9
.4
.2 In Transition
.3 In Transition
.3 In Transition
.3 4.9
.3 3.1
^ NDO
Tl %/p]
(not any
(not any
43.5
46.4
45.7
41.7
34.2
38.4
40.7
38.9
43.3
(not any
(not any
(not any
(not any
B
pm
one
2
3
2
2
3
2
2
2
one
one
6
6
6
6
6
6
5
one
one
one
specific
.8
.1
3
.8
.9
.1
.8
.6
.7
specific
specific
.6
.7
.3
.3
.5
.4
.9
specific
specific
specific
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
-------
00:22:02
00:23:02
00:24:02
00:25:02
00:26:02
00:27:02
00:28:02
00:29:02
00:30:02
00:31:02
00:32:02
00:33:02
00:34:02
00:35:02
00:36:02
00:37:02
00:38:02
34
33
32.3
32.3
32.3
32.8
33.4
33.6
34
35.8
37.3
38.3
39.3
40.6
41.9
43.1
45
103.8 2.6
106.3 2.3 ;
102 2.2
98.3 2.1
100.6 2
102.8 1.9 '.
104.2 1.9 ;
104.8 In Transition
112.5 In Transition
120.2
123.2
120.9
115.8
108.5
110
108.1
118.9
(not any one
(not any one
14.1
9.4
14.9
15.5
13.2
20.7
24.7
26
specific ND
specific ND
Run avgs. 34.6 108.0' • 5.4 30.1 4.4
-------
Project ID: 97-14?? Date: 05-15-1997 Start Time: 14:25:20
Client: LASCO Test Location: TTE
1 Min. Averages Condition 3 Run number 1
Time Open 10 Open 9 NDO C NDO A NDO B
ppm %/ppm %/ppm %/ppm %/ppm
14:26:26
14:27:26
14:28:26
14:29:26
14:30:26
14:31:26
14:32:26
14:33 :26
14:34:26
14:35:26
14:36:26
14:37:26
14:38:26
14:39:26
14:40:26
14 :41:26
14:42:26
14:43:26
14 :44:26
14:45:26
14:46:26
14:47:26
14:48:26
14:49:26
14:50:26
14:51:26
14:52:26
14:53:26
14:54:26
14:55:26
14:56:26
14:57:26
14:58:26
14:59:26
15:00:26
15:01:26
15:02:26
15:03:26
15:04:26
15:05:26
15:06:26
15:07:26
15:08:26
178.4
180.8
177.8
179.1
182.3
183.1
185
186.2
187.2
187.1
188.2
187.6
186.6
185.3
185.2
185. 1
185
185.7
184 .7
184.9
185
184
183.6
183.8
182.6
182.9
183.6
182.5
181.5
181.1
183 . 6
185.6
185.3
184.3
185
186.6
187.3
188.6
188.6
189.4
190.6
191.7
193.9
63.4
65.1
62.7
63.1
62.2
64.2
59.8
59.5
58.8
60.3
59.4 In Transition
58.6 1.1
57.3 0.8
56.7 0.7
55.8 0.6
57. 8 0.4
.56.2 0.4
57.8 0.5
56.3 0.6
56 0.6
56.4
54.7
53.8
53.5
54.6
54.3
54.9
66.8
76
86.5
93.7 In Transition
110.3
114.6
109.9
110.6
114.4
113
116.2
119.8
122.4
119.1 In Transition
118 In Transition
118.6
12.6
12
11.1
11.6
11.8
11.7
11.9
11.7
11.7
11.3
(not any
(not any
9.3
9.6
10.1
10.5
10.2
10.5
10.8
10.3
10.6
(not any
(not any
one specific
10.8
11.3
11.2
11.5
11.5
11.2
10.3
10.1
10.5
10.6
one specific
one specific
one specific
13
ND
ND
ND
ND
94.1
-------
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
:09:26
:10:26
: 11:26
: 12:26
: 13:26
:14:26
: 15:26
:16:26
:17:26
:18:26
:19:26
:20:26
:21:26
:22:26
:23:26
:24:26
:25:26..
196.5
191.7
190.3
188.9
189
189.6
189.6
188.5
187
186.3
186.6
186.4
184.1
183.4
182.2
182.2
183.5
116
116.5
119.7
121
119.8
114.1
111.9
113.9
115.3
113.1 In Transition
119.3
122.6
122 . 7
119.9
115.5
113.7
116.3
(not any
13
12
15.7
12.7
14.3
17.1
17.7
13
14-
13.5
13.7
17.3
13.6
13.9
12.9
11.7
one specific ND
Run avgs. 185.7 87.9 V 0.6 12.0 12.3
-------
Project ID: 97-14?? Date: 05-15-1997 Start Time: 15:59:36
Client: LASCO Test Location: TTE
1 Min. Averages Condition 3 Run number 2
Time Open 10 Open 9 NDO C NDO A NDO B
ppm %/ppm %/ppm %/ppm %/ppm
16:00:42
16:01:42
16:02.:42
16:03:42
16:04:42
16:05:42
16:06:42
16:07:42
16:08:42
16:09:42
16:10:42
16:11:42
16:12:42
16:13 :42
16:14:42
16:15:42
16:16:42
16:17:42
16:18:42
16:19:42
16:20:42
16:21:42
16:22:42
16:23:42
16:24 :42
16:25:42
16:26:42
16:27:42
16:28:42
16:29:42
16:30:42
16:31:42
16:32:42
16:33:42
16:34:42
16:35:42
16:36:42
16:37:42
16:38:42
16:39:42
16:40:42
16:41:42
16:42:42
183.8
183.5
182.3
178.6
177.2
177.1
178.9
178
176.3
175.5
175.3
175.8
175.4
'••. 175
175.3
181.8
187.7
189.2
191.9
194.6
193.7
193.5
194.4
194.1
194.4
193.9
194.8
194.5
194.2
194.7
194.8
194.1
194.6
193.3
193.2
193.8
193.7
194.8
193.5
192.6
193
192.9
191.7
125.2
125.5
127.9
127.1
124.8
120.2
120.9
123.8
123.1
123.6
127.3 In Transition
132.1
129
126.9
'122.7
125.5
125.9
124.3
119.5
121.5
119 In Transition
117.1
118.6
117.3
120.9
117.9
113.1
115.2
117
118.7
120 In Transition
119.9 1.7
119.3 1.6
114.3 1.6
113.8 1.7
118.9 1.7
119.2 1.7
122.7 1.8
124.6 1.7
124.4 1.8
122.8 1.8
116.9 In Transition
117.7
15.1
14.4
16
15.6
15.1
15.9
14.9
15.7
17.7
17.1
(not any one specific
2.2
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.7
1.7
1.7
1.7
(not any one specific
14.4
16
15.3
15.3
15.4
15.4
14.5
15.2
15
(not any one specific
(not any one specific
14.2
ND
ND
ND
ND
-------
16:43:42
16:44:42
16:45:42
16:46:42
16:47:42
16:48:42
16:49:42
16:50:42
16:51:42
16:52:42
16:53:42
16:54:42
16:55:42
16:56:42
16:57:42
16:58:42
16:59:42
192.3
191.1
191.5
192.1
192.1
193.5
193.1
193.1
194.4
194.3
193.6
192.5
192.6
192.8
191.3
190.9
190.8
117
116.6
118.1
115.6
114.4
116.3
115.5
116.2 In
113 .4
113.9
111.8
108.1
108.7
107.1
106.5
104.5
105.1
14.5
14.3
14.2
14
13.7
14.1
13.4
Transition (not any one specific ND
2.1
2
1.9
1.9
1.9
1.9
1.9
2
2.1
Run avgs. 189.1 118.9 1.8 15.1 1.8
-------
Project ID: 97-14?? Date: 05-15-1997 Start Time: 17:35:54
Client: LASCO Test Location: TTE
1 Min. Averages Condition 3 Run number 3
Time Open 10 Open 9 NDO C NDO A NDO B
ppm %/ppm %/ppm %/ppm %/ppm
17:37:00
17:38:00
17:39:00
17:40:00
17:41:00
17:42:00
17:43:00
17:44:00
17:45:00
17:46:00
17:47:00
17:48:00
''17:49:00
17:50:00
17:51:00
17:52 :00
17:53:00
17:54:00
17:55:00
17:56:00
17:57:00
17:58:00
17:59:00
18:00:00
18:01:00
18:02:00
18:03 :00
18:04:00
18:05:00
18:06:00
18:07:00
18:08:00
18:09:00
18:10:00
18:11:00 .,
18:12:00
18:13:00
18:14:00
18:15:00
18:16:00
18:17:00
18:18:00
18:19:00
190.8
189.2
189.1
189.8
189.4
190.4
189.4
190.1
190.2
191
190.1
189.3
187.9
188.3
189.9
190.3
189
188.1
188.3
188.4
188.2
189.3
188.9
187.5
186.6
186.9
186.8
188.4
189.6
187.3
185.2
187.7
188.1
188.2
189.4
187.7
186.8
186.9
186.9
200.4
215.2
228.2
234.7
119.6
121.1
115.8
115.4
121.6
122.2
120.4
117.3
114
111.2
109.2
118.2
119.4" In
119.7
112.7
110.5
115.3
116.5
116.5
112.1
111.9
109.4
111.8
108.5
107 In
102.9
83.5
74.2
65.3
63.6
61
60.9
64.8 In
75.1
92.5
103.6
107.9
110.4
107
105.1
108 In
110.2
112.7
Transition
1.6
1.4
1.5
1.5
1.5
4
6.4
12.6
9.3
10.1
12.1
Transition
Transition
13.7
11.3
13
11.6
13.2
11.4
13.4
Transition
12.7
11.1
11.1
11.1
12
12.6
12.8
11.9
11.4
11.4
11.8
12
(not any one
(not any one
11.6
11.9
11.9
11.9
11.7
11.9
11.8
(not any one
(not any one
10.3
10.1
specific ND
specific ND
• '
specific ND
specific ND
-------
18:20:00
18:21:00
18:22:00
18:23:00
18:24:00
18:25:00
18:26:00
18:27:00
18:28:00
18:29:00
18:30:00
18:31:00
18:32:00.
18:33:00
18:34:00
18:35:00
18:36:00
Run avg^s .
238
239.6
240.3
239.7
240.2
239.5
238.7
237.4
237.2'
237.2
236.1
235.4
237.3
236.6
237.4
237.4
237.6
204.7
116.6
112.4
116
117.5
113
107.8
109.9
110.7 In Transition
115
118
118.9
114.8 •
108.2
105.4
107.9
107.3
101.5
106.4 8.3
10.2
10
12.4
10.5
10
9.8
9.7
(not any
11.3 •
one specific ND
2.1
3.6
2.1
2.2
1.4
6.6
4.2
1.4
1.5
2.8
-------
Project ID: 97-14?? Date: 05-15-1997 Start Time: 20:05:04
Client: LASCO Test Location: TTE
1 Min. Averages Condition 4 Run number 1
Time Open 10 Open 9 NDO C NDO A NDO B
ppm %/ppm %/ppm %/ppm %/ppm
20:06:10
20:07:10
20:08:10
20:09:10
20:10:10
20:11:10
20:12:10
20:13:10
20:14:10
20:15:10
20:16:10
20:17:10
20:18:10
20:19:10
20:20:10
20:21:10
20:22:10
20:23:10
20:24:10
20:25:10
20:26:10
20:27:10
20:28:10
20:29:10
20:30:10
20:31:10
20:32:10
20:33:10
20:34:10
20:35:10
20:36:10
20:37:10
20:38:10
20:39:10
20:40:10
20:41:10
20:42:10
20:43:10
20:44:10
20:45:10
20:46:10
20:47:10
20:48:10
233.6
232.7
232.4
223.1
230.7
231.9
233.4
233.8
233.6
233.1
233.3
232.6
233.3
235.2
232.8
231.1
229.5
231.8
232.6
232.2
230.7
231.8
232.5
233.3
233.4
232.2
232.6
232.3
231.6
232.3
231.8
231.2
231.3
231.4
231.8
231.2
231.7
229.3
230.7
230.1
229.4
230.5
232
114.9
112.5
111.4
110.7
110.4
110.9
112.6
107.6
107.6
108.3
109.3 In Transition
111.3
112.6
110.1
109.6
112 . 1
108.9
109.4
106.9
112 In Transition
109.4
109.9
110.3
109.6
110.3
106.2
109.6
110.5
113.8
115.6
106.7 In Transition
108.9 1.8
109.1 1.8
108.9 1.7
109.8 1.7
111.6 1.7
112.8 1.7
112.8 1.6
110.6 1.6
108.4 1.6
110.2 In Transition
107.4
106.4
12.9
13.1 . -
12 . 8
12.3 !'
11.8
12.6
12.1
12.1
12.5
12.2
(not any one specific
1.7
1.6
1.7
1.6
1.8
1.6
1.5
1.6
(not any one specific
10.5
12.5
13.4
12.5
12.8
12.7
12.7
12.9
13.1
12.7
(not any one specific
(not any one specific
13.8
14.7
ND
ND
ND
ND
-------
20:49:10
20:50:10
20:51:10
20:52:10
20:53:10
20:54:10
20:55:10
20:56:10
20:57:10
20:58:10
20:59:10
21:00:10
21:01:10
21:02:10
21:03 :10
21:04:10
21:05:10
Run avgs .
229.6
227.8
228.9
229.7
229.5
229.7
230.7
228.4
227.2
228.2
229.6
229.1
228.6
229.4
230.2
229.6
227.8
231.0
111
111.2
110.7
108.8
109.5
108.1
108.4
108.4 In
109
109.9
110.2
110.1
108.8
108.9
110
109.9
115.6
110.1
Transition
1.7
1.7
1.6
1.7
1.7
1.7
1.7
1.7
1.7
1.7
13.9
13.6
13.2
12.5
12.8
13.1
12.7
(not any one specific ND
12.8 1.6
-------
Project ID: 97-14?? Date: 05-15-1997 Start Time: 21:30:10
Client: LASCO Test Location: TTE
1 Min. Averages Condition 4 Run number 2
Time Open 10 Open 9 NDO C NDO A NDO B
ppm %/ppm %/ppm %/ppm %/ppm
21:31:16
21:32:16
21:33:16
21:34:16
21:35:16
21:36:16
21:37:16
21:38:16
21:39:16
21:40:16
21:41:16
21:42 :16
21:43:16
21:44:16
21:45:16
21:46 :16
21:47:16
21:48:16
21:49:16
21:50:16
21:51:16
21:52:16
21:53:16
21:54:16
21:55:16
21:56:16
21:57:16
21:58:16
21:59:16
22:00:16
22:01:16
22:02:16
22:03:1.6
22:04:16
22:05:16
22:06:16
22:07:16
22:08:16
22:09:16
22:10:16
22:11:16
22:12:16
22:13:16
227.8
228.3
228.8
229.3
229.2
229
230.1
229.6
227.8
227
226.7
226.7
226.3
225.6
226.4
225.9
225.3
226.7
227.4
226.8
227.3
225.7
224.8
225.6
225.5
225.6
225.4
224.6
223.5
223.5
223.7
222.6
222.2
222.5
222.6
222.1
223
220.8
220.8
221.1
220.9
220.2
217.5
112.9
108.4
110.2
114.2
110.8
109.4
109.4
109.7
108.7
113.9
115.3 In
115.4
115.3
112.8
109.5
106 .4
109.1
111.2
110.2
109
109.4 In
109.5
111.8
108.7
112.1
110.2
114.5
114.5
115.6
115
113.8 In
113.3
113.6
113.1
113.7
117.9
116.1
115.9
117.3
116.9
117.8 In
117.4
114.9
Transition
1.7
1.7
; 1.5
1.5
1.5
1.7
1.7
1.7
1.7
Transition
Transition
1.8
1.7
.1.7
1.7
1-7
1.6
1.5
1.6
1.6
Transition
15.9
16.9
16.6
16.8
15.4
15.9
15.9
16.1
15.5
15.6
(not any one
(not any one
17.3
17.4
18.1
17.8
17.2
18
18.5
19.2
18.6
(not any one
(not any one
19.3
19.4
specific ND
specific ND
specific ND
specific ND
-------
22:14:16
22:15:16
22:16:16
22:17:16
22:18:16
22:19:16
22:20:16
22:21:16
22:22:16
22:23 :16
22:24 :16
22:25:16
22:26:16
22:27:16
22:28:16
22:29:16
22:30:16
Run avgs .
215.8
212.3
213
221.7
229.7
233
235
234.4
234.8
236.3
235.9
236
234.8
235.3
236.6
236.1
234.8
226.6
115.7
113
112.7
113.4
115.1
117.4
117.5
115.3
116.5
115.7
111.6
116.1
117
115.4
113.5
115.3
.115.8
113.4 1.6
. 19-3
19.6
18.7
19.1 :
19.3
19.3
19.2
18.4
19.7
19.3
20
20.1
20.2
20.2
20
20
19.9
18.3 Not Run
-------
Project ID: 97-3020 Date: 05-19-1997 Start Time: 09:03:36
Client: PES Test Location: OVEN/NDO Condition 5
1 Min. Averages Run number 1
Time Op
F
09:04:42
09:05:42
09:06:42
09:07:42
09:08:42
09:09:42
09:10:42
09:11:42
09:12:42
09:13 :42
09:14:42
09:15:42
09:16:42
09:17:42
09:18 :42
09:19:42
09:20:42
09:21:42
09:22:42
09:23 :42
09:24 :42
09:25:42
09:26:42
09:27:42
09:28:42
09:29:42
09:30:42
09:31:42
09:32:42
09:33:42
09:34:42
09:35:42
09:36:42
09:37:42
09:38:42
09:39:42
09:40:42
09:41:42
09:42:42
09:43:42
09:44:42
09:45:42
ten 10 Ope
ipm %/{
126.5
125.3
124.6
124
125
126.5
125.9
126.4
126.1
127
128.7
128
127.5
127.4
124 .6
122.6
122.1
122.2
122.5
124.7
125.7
124'. 8
124.4
125.2
126.4
127.2
126.6
126.9
127.4
128.7
128.7
127.3
125.4
126.6
126
127.2
128.2
129
128.8
127.9
125.5
122
2n 9 NDO C
ppm %/ppm
146.5
146.1
144.4
142.3
142.5
140.3
142.4
144.1
145.7
147
149.4
150.9
149.7
' 147.8
145. 9
145.6
144
147.1
147.9
147.3
149.8
146
147
148.6
151.8
152.4
153.6
153.8
149.1
150.7
152.6
148.2
150.6
150.5
149.8
154.3
155.5
152.7
151.1
153.1
152.4
151.6
NDO A NDO B
%/ppm %/ppm
1.4
1.1
1.2
1.9
1.5
1
1
0.9
1.2
1.8
1.4
1.3
1.1
1.2
1.3
1
0.7
1.1
1
0.7
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.4
0.6
1.2
1.2
1.4
1.6
0.8
0.7
1
0.6
1
1
1.4
1.4
2
1.3
0.9
0.8
1.1
-------
09:46:42
09:47:42
09:48:42
09:49:42
09:50:42
09:51:42
09:52:42
09:53:42
09:54:42
09:55:42
09:56:42
09:57:42
09:58:42
09:5.9:42
10:00:42
10:01:42
10:02:42
10:03:42
10:04:42
10:05:42
10:06:42
10:07:42
10:08:42
10:09:42
10:10:42
10:11:42
10:12:42
10:13:42
10:14:42
10:15:42
10:16:42
10:17:42
10:18:42
10:19:42
10:20:42
10:21:42
10:22:42
10:23:42
10:24:42
10:25:42
10:26:42
10:27:42
121
119.8
119.3
118.7
120
122.9
123.2
123.5
124.1
123.9
123.3
123.4
123.6
125.2
125.6
125.7
126.7
128.5
131.7
133
131.7
132
130.1
127.8"
125.8
123.2
125.3
126.3
127
124.7
122.6
121.5
121
121.1
124.7
125.9
125.5
127.3
127.9
125.9
126.5
128.9
151.6 In
151.4
150.2
145.9
146.6
149.8
150.2
147.6
150.8
156
154.2
153.1
152.5
153.7
153
154.6
154.3
155.2
155.2 •.
154.2
153 .8 In
152.2
150.6
151.3
151.4
150.2
147.3
149.6
150.1
149.2
150
148.2
149.5
152
153 .2
152.8
147.7
146.1
146.5
149.3
148.6
150.6
Transition
-1.7
-1.9
-2
-2.1
-2.1
-2.1
-2
-2
-2.1
-2
-2
-2.1
-2.1
-2.1
-2.1
-2.1
-2.1
-2.2
-2.1
Transition
:(not any one specific ND
i
(not any one specific ND
-1.9
-2.2
-2.2
-2.3
-2.3
-2.4
-2.4
-0.4
-2.1
-2.2
-2
-2.2
-2.2
-2.2
-2.3
-2.4
-2.4
-2.3
-2.1
-2
-2.1
Run avgs. 125.6 149.8 -2.0 1.1 -2.1
-------
Project ID: 97-3020 Date: 05-19-1997 Start Time: 11:06:56
Client: PES Test Location: OVEN/NDO Condition 5
1 Min. Averages Run number 2
Time Open 10 Open 9 NDO C NDO A NDO B
ppm %/ppm %/ppm %/ppm %/ppm
11:08:02
11:09:02
11:10:02
11:11:02
11:12:02
11:13:02
11:14:02
11:15:02
11:16:02
11:17:02
11:18:02
11:19:02
11:20:02
11:21:02
11:22:02
11:23 :02
11:24 :02
11:25:02
11:26:02
11:27:02
11:28:02
11:29:02
11:30:02
11:31:02
11:32:02
11:33 :02
11:34:02
11:35:02
11:36:02
11:37:02
11:38:02
11:39:02
11:40:02
11:41:02
11:42:02
11:43:02
11:44:02
11:45:02
11:46:02
11:47:02
11:48:02
11:49:02
11:50:02
117
116.5
115.9
115.4
115
116
116.5
116.3
117.7
119.9
122.9
122.5
121.9
120.7
119.9
120.2
123.6
124.8
124.5
123.4
124.4
123.1
122
121.6
121.1
122.1
122.6
123.5
122
121.6
122.8
122.8
122.7
122.9
122
121.9
121.5
120.4
120.3
120
120
120.1
119.4
27.4
141.2
163.7
157.2
158.4
165.3
168
168.4
169.4
168.8
168.1
166.4
166.6
167.5
167.5'
169.7
166.7
169.7
168
162.7
166.5
167.1
163.7
166.6
166
165.9
169.2
168.4
167.8
166.8
168
166.9
168.4
169.9
170.7
168.5
169.2
169.2
168.2
171.1
171 In Transition
168.7 4.9
171.4 3.4
4.2
4
3.8
3.3
3.4
3.6
3.5
3.5
3.6
3.5
4.7
5.2
- 5.8
5.9 ' ;-.'•
5.7
5.6
5.5
5.6
5.7
5.6
5.4
5.2
5.9
5.8
5
5.2
5.3
5.1
5.6
5.7
5.7
5.9
5.2
4.4
3.6
3.2
2.9
3.1
3.2
3
(not any one specific ND
-------
11:51:02
11:52:02
11:53 :02
11:54:02
11:55:02
11:56:02
11:57:02
11:58:02
11:59:02
12:00:02
12:01:02
12:02:02
12:03 :02
12:04:02
12:05:02
12:06:02
12:07:0;2
12:08:02
12:09:02
12:10:02
12:11:02
12:12:02
12:13:02
12:14:02
12:15:02
12:16:02
12:17:02
12:18:02
12:19:02
12:20:02
12:21:02
12:22:02
12:23:02
12:24:02
12 :25 :02
12:26:02
12:27:02
12:28:02
12:29:02
12:30:02
12:31:02
Run avgs .
118.2
118.7
119.6
120.8
121
122.7
122.7
122.6
121.5
121.4
120
120.7
121
120.7
122.5
125.1
125.7
126.4
127
126.5
125.8
124.8
122.9
122.4
122.8
121.6
120.7
121
121.4
123.9
125.9
126
125.6
124.2
123 .4
122.3
122.2
121.2
120.1
119 . 1
118.9
121.6
172.4
167
165.8
167.2
168.2
169.7
167.4
167.2
169
165.6
158.8
162.8
164.3
162.7
164.4
165.5
164.7
164.8
i?63
•'•1*61.4 In
159.1
157.2
158.8 .
159.1
160.9
159.6
158.5
160.8
159.5
162.5
167.4
169
167.6
168.9
170.1
167.3
166.9
165.7
168.5
168.5
169.3
164.1
1
0.7
0.8
0.7
0.5
0.4
0.4
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.6
0.4
0.4
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
Transition
0.9
i
?
(not any one specific ND
0.7
0.5
0.6
0.5
0.5
0.4
0.6
0.2
0.2
0.1
0.3
0.4
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.8
0.3
0.8
0.3
0.2
0.6
4.7 0.5
-------
Project ID: 97-3020 Date: 05-19-1997 Start Time: 13:57:23
Client: pes Test Location: OVEN/NDO Condition 5
1 Min. Averages Run number 3
Time Open 10 Open 9 NDO C NDO A NDO B
ppm %/ppm %/ppm %/ppm %/ppm
13:58:29
13:59:29
14:00:29
14:01:29
14:02:29
14:03:29
14:04:29
14:05:29
14:06:29
14:07:29
14:08:29
14:09:29
14:10:29
14:11:29
14:12:29
14:13:29
14:14 :29
14:15:29
14:16:29
14:17:29
14:18:29
14:19:29
14:20:29
14:21:29
14:22:29
14:23:29
14:24:29
14:25:29
14:26:29
14:27:29
14:28:29
14:29:29
14:30:29
14:31:29
14:32:29
14:33:29
14:34:29
14:35:29
14:36:29
14:37:29
14738:29
14:39:29
14:40:29
116.6
119.8
120.9
115
124.1
123.8
124.6
124.2
125
124.9
124.1
124.7
,123
121.6
121.7
120.8
121.2
120.7 •
122
121.8
121.6
120.2
118.8
118
117.8
118.2
119.6
120.1
120.6
118.8
117.4
116.9
119.7
123.2
123.4
121.7
120.4
119.7
119
119.7
118.9
118.5
121.1
146
147.3
142.9
144.6
145.9
145.2
146.1
144.7
149.5
148.7
146.8
147.3
149.7
149.3
150
149.3
147.3
146.1
145.9
143.8
141.6
138.5
136.2
135.6
136.2
134.1
133.9
132.8
135.2
132.4
131
130.2
128.4
134.4
134.1
136.5
137.3
138.8
135.6
136.7
137.3
137
138.4 In Transition'
3.3
3.4
3.2
3.2
2.9
3
3.2
3.4
3.2
3.8
3.6
2.9
3.2
3.5
3.4
3 .1
3.3
3.7
3.3
3.6
3.2
3.1
3
3
3
2.9
2.8
3.3
3.2
2.8
2.8
3.4
3.2
3.2
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.2
3.4
4.2
4.8
4.5
(not any one specific ND
-------
14:41:29
14:42:29
14:43 :29
14:44:29
14:45:29
14:46:29
14:47:29
14:48:29
14:49:29
14:50:29
14:51:29
14:52:29
14:53:29
14:54:29
14:55:29
14:56:29
14:57:29
14:58:29
14:59:29
15:00:29
15:01:29
15:02:29
15:03 :29
15:04:29
15:05:29
15:06:29
15:07:29
15:08:29
15:09:29
15:10:29
15:11:29
15:12:29
15:13:29
15:14:29
15:15:29
15:16:29
15:17:29
15:18:29
15:19:29
15:20:29
15:21:29
124.2
126.2
125.7
124.7
124.5
123.6
123.9
123.7
124.2
123.2
123.7
124
124.1
120.8
118.3
116.6
114.9
114.8
113.7
113.6
113.6
112.8
112.2
111.4
111.7
110.8
110.6
110.4
109.7
110
109.1
108.6
108.5
108.6
108
108.6
107.7
106.8
107.4
107
108.1
140.9
144.5
145.8
143
139.2
140.2
140.2
142.4
142.9
136.3
136.8
136.9
136.9
139.8
141.2
137.8
139.8
139.1
137.8
138 In
136.8 In
135.3 In
135.7
133.6
135.3
140.7
141.7
138.4
133.7
130.9
133.2
135.2
136.6
139.8
138.9
142.2
141.1
145.3
143.6
141.3
136.4
1.1
1
1
1
0.8
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.6
0.5
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
1
1.1
1.1
Transition
Transition
Transition
,
(not any one specific ND
(not any one specific ND
(not any one specific ND
2.5
1.7
1.2
1
0.9
0.9
0.9
0.9
0.8
1
1
1
1.2
0.8
0.9
1.1
0.8
0.9
1.1
Run avgs. 118.1 139.8 0.8 3.3 1.1
-------
Project ID: 97-3020 Date: 05-19-1997 Start Time: 16:05:49
Client: pes Test Location: OVEN/NDO Condition 6
1 Min. Averages Run number 1
Time Open 10 Open 9 NDO C NDO A NDO B
ppm %/ppm %/ppm %/ppm %/ppm
16:06:55
16:07:55
16:08:55
16:09:55
16:10:55
16:11:55
16:12:55
16:13:55
16:14:55
16:15:55
16:16:55
16:17:55
16:18:55
16:19:55
16:20:55
16:21:55
16:22:55
16:23:55
16:24:55
16:25:55
16:26:55
16:27:55
16:28:55
16:29:55
16:30:55
16:31:55
16:32:55
16:33:55
16:34:55
16:35:55
16:36 :55
16:37:55
16:38:55
16:39:55
16:40:55
16:41:55
16:42:55
16:43 :55
16:44:55
16:45:55
16:46:55
16:47:55
16:48:55
105.5
105.7
111.5
112.2
112.6
113.4
114.3
115.2
116.5
116.1
116.8
117.5
116 . 8
115.9
115.7
115.7
116.2
117.1
120.9
120.4
118.9
'117.8
117.8
116.7
115.7
114.2
114.4
117.9
120.4
120.7
121.4
121.4
120.5
122.6
126
128.2
130.2
131.6
130.3
127.3
124.8
122.1
121.1
157
163.7
163.3
162.8
158.1
155.5
156.7
161.3
165.6
165.7
162.3
161.1
. 162.1
166.2
164.9
169.1
170
169.1
168.2
170.5
171.2
173.5
173
170.7
169.6
166.1
167
163.7
162.1
163.2
164
167.8
168.5
168.7
166.1
161.6
163.9
166.5
164.8
166.8
167.1
166.8 In Transition
167.1 3.3
3.4
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.5
2.9
4.6
3 .4
3.1
3
3
3
3.4
3.7
3.7
3 .6
4.1
3.9
4.4
4.4
4.8
4.4
3.9
4.3
3.9
3.8
3.9
4.7
5.2
4.5
4.1
4.3
4.3
4.2
5.2
5.4
4.8
4.1
4
3.4
3.5
(not any one specific ND
-------
16:49:55 119.7 167.6 2.5
16:50:55 120.2 170.2 2.5
16:51:55 121.8 169.4 2.5
16:52:55 122.8 165.1 2.4
16:53:55 124.9 164.6 2.6
16:54:55 128.5 163.9 2.7
16:55:55 . 132.6 164.2 2.7
16:56:55 135 141.1 2.6
16:57:57 115.9 101.1 2.8
16:58:59 No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data
16:59:45 74.9 71.9 2.6
17:00:45 60.9 61 2.5
17:01:45 56.5 68.1 2.7
17:02:45 57.3 98.7 2.8
17:03:45 56.8 117.6 In Transition (not any one specific ND
17:04:45 54.9 127.4 In Transition (not any one specific ND
17:05:45 55.9 137.7 3.4
17:06:45 67.9 175.6 ,. 2.5
Run avgs. 111.7 156.3 2.7 3.9 3.0
-------
Project ID: 97-3020 Date: 05-19-1997 Start Time: 17:34:13
Client: pes Test Location: OVEN/NDO Condition 6
1 Min. Averages Run number 2
Time Of
E
17:35:19
17:36:19
17:37:19
17:38:19
17:39:19
17:40:19
17:41:19
17:42:19
17:43:19
17:44 :19
17:45:19
17:46:19
17:47:19
17:48:19
17:49:19
17:50:19
17:51:19
17:52:19
17:53:19
17:54:19
17:55:19
17:56:19
17:57:19
17:58:19
17:59:19
18:00:19
18:01:19 .
18:02 :19
18:03:19
18:04:19
18:05:19
18:06:19
18:07:19
18:08:19
18:09:19
18:10:19
18:11:19
18:12:19
18:13:19
18:14:19
18:15:19
18:16:19
18:17:19
>en 10 Op<
)pm %/]
125.2
125.1
126.2
126.4
127.9
131.4
132.3
133.9
138.4
138.4
136.4
135.1
134.9
134
133.4
133.4
133.9
137.2
137.2
136.1
137
137.6
137.1
137.6
136.2
134.9
135.4
137.3
138.4
138.4
139
140.1
139.8
138.7
138.7
141.3
142.4
140.9
139.8
141.5
142.5
142
142.8
=n 9 NDO C NDO A
ppm %/ppm %/ppn"
85.3
88.3
89.6
93.1
107.3
125.3
134.2
141.6
151.3
160.5
161.8
162.5
162.8
164.2
163.4
167
169.4
171.1
172.2
170.1
171.8
173.3
169.8
170.9
170
166.7
166.4
169.3
169.7
171.1
168.9
166.1
167.4
166.1
163.6
164.2
165.8
168.1
171.2
170.6
168.8
171.5
170.4 In Transition
NDO B
i %/ppm
5.1
4.7
3.7
3.7
4
4.3
3.8
3.8
3.6
4.1
3.1
3 .7
3.9
3.4
4.1
3 .4
3.9
3.6
4
4
4
4.1
. 3.7
3.7
3.6
3.7
3.8
3.2
3.2
3.8
3.8
4
3.7
4.5
4
3.6
3.8
4
3.4
3.5
3.5
3.6
(not any one specific ND
-------
18:18:19
18:19:19
18:20:19
18:21:19
18:22:19
18:23 :19
18:24:19
18:25:19
18:26:19
18:27:19
18:28:19
18:29:19
18:30:19
18:31:19
18:32:19
18:33 :19
18:34:19
18:35:19
18:36:19
18:37:19
18:38:19
18:39:19
18:40:19
18:41:19
18:42:19
18:43 :19
18:44:19
18:45:19
18:46:19
18:47:19
18:48:19
18:49:19
18:50:19
18:51:19
18:52 :19
18:53:19
18:54:19
18:55:19
142
144
145.5
145.4
144.9
145
144.8
146
145.8
145.1
144.1
142.5
143.8
146.5
146
145.3
146
• -145 . 7
146.8
148.3
150.6
150.5
148.5
146.4
148.2
148.1
146.7
145.4
141.6
139.6
136.7
134.3
136
137.9
138.7
139
141.1
139.4
171.3
172.1
171.1
171.8
168.8
169.1
167
162.5
164.2
166.8
168.4
168.9
171.7
169.3
164.9
165
167
167.1
162.2
163.5 In
166.7 In
167.7
164.4
165.2
166.7
167.8
165.9
168.6
167.8
167.5
169.1
164.1
165.5
167.5
166.4
167.1
163.4
164.3
2.8
2.8
2.5
2.9
2.9
2.6
8.9
6.9
6.8
5.6
7.3
6.7
6.4
6.4
8.3
7.1
7
7.2
' 6.1
Transition
Transition
(not any one specific ND
(not any one specific ND
6.3
5.8
7.1
5.1
7.4
6.4
10.3
17
9.2
20.1
17.9
7
8
10.7
5.8
5.8
15.5
Run avgs. 139.9 161.4 5.6 3.8 9.7
-------
Project ID: 97-3020 Date: 05-19-1997 Start Time: 19:36:55
Client: pes Test Location: OVEN/NDO Condition 6
1 Min. Averages Run number 3
Time Open 10 Open 9 NDO C NDO A NDO B
ppm %/ppm %/ppm %/ppm %/ppm
19:38:01
19:39:01
19:40:01
19:41:01
19:42:01
19:43 :01
19:44:01
19:45:01
19:46:01
19:47:01
19:48:01
19:49:01
19:50:01
19:51:01
19:52:01
19:53 :01
19:54 :01
19:55:01
19:56:01
19:57:01
19:58:01
19:59:01
20:00:01
20:01:01
20:02:01
20:03:01
20:04:01
20:05:01
20:06:01
20:07:01
20:08:01
20:09:01
20:10:01
20:11:01
20:12:01
20:13 :01
20:14:01
20:15:01
20:16:01
20:17:01
20:18:01
129.6
128.6
121.6
125.8
127
125.4
126.4
127.1
128
131.4
132.3
132.4
133.7
134.7
137.3
134.6
134 .2
134.1
132.4
132.8
131.7
129.9
128
131
134.7
134.3
132.9
131.9
131.6
131
131.3
132.4
133.9
134.2
132.1
131.1
129.7
129.9
128.8
129.3
132.2
163.1
166.6
167.9
164.3
168.5
169.4
169.6
166.9
168.5
171.7
171.6
172.3
167.7
168.2
171
170.7
170.9
170
169.9
166.9
166.7
170.1 In
168.9
172
172.9
173.2
170.8
166.6
167.6
168.7
165.8.
163.6
164.5 In
164.9
164.5
166.7
160.1
158.3
153.6
155.9
162.6
Transition
2.1
1.6
2.9
2.3
2.5
1.7
1.5
1.4
1.3
1.3
Transition
2.6
2.3
2.2
2.2
2.4
2.4
2.4
2.4
2.5
2.6
2.5
2.4
.2 . 3
2.2
2.5
2 .4
2.5
2.4
2.4
2.1
2
(not any one specific ND
(not any one specific ND
35.6
38.4
35.6
32.4
34.2
20.1
14.1
26.1
Run avgs. 131.0 167.2 1.9 2.4 29.6
-------
Project ID: 97-14?? Date: 05-20-1997 Start Time: 14:49:53
Client: PES/Lasco Test Location: Open 9&10/NDOS Condition 7
1 Min. Averages Run number 1
Time Open 10 Open 9 NDO C. NDO A NDO B
ppm %/ppm %/ppm %/ppm %/ppm
14:50:59
14:51:59
14:52:59
14:53:59
14:54:59
14:55:59
14:56:59
14:57:59
14:58:59
14:59:59
15:00:59';
15:01:59 ;
15:02:59
15:03:59
15:04:59
15:05:59
15:06:59
15:07:59
15:08:59
15:09:59
15:10:59
15:11:59
15:12:59
15:13 :59
15:14:59
15:15:59
15:16:59
15:17:59
15:18:59
15:19:59
15:20:59
15:21:59
15:22:59
15:23:59
15:24:59
15:25:59
15:26:59
15:27:59
15:28:59
15:29:59
15:30:59
15:31:59
15:32:59
167.5
166.5
165
166.4
167.4
167.3
169.3
171.3
171.8
170.5
170.7
168.6
169.8
169.8 :
171.3
172.7
171.4
169.9
168.9
167.5
168.5
169.5
168.4
167.7
166.9
166.5
164.2
161.9
162.4
162.5
162.4
163
162.6
162.4
162.2
161.1
162.3
161.3
161.6
160.3
159.5
160.2
160.7
142.7
142.5
144
139.9
137.5
142.2
145-
142.8
146.8
143.7
147.1
144.1 X.
:. 143'. 3
145.6
147.8
147.5
152.1
148.1
143.7
145.1
146.2
145.3
140.4
142.3
145.3
142.8
141.7
142.2
143
144.5
146.3
146.9
143.9
141.8
147.6
148.1
149.6
146.4
146.9
146
148.8
146.9 In Transition
148.5 2.6
2.8
2.7
2.6
2.7
2.7
3.4
3.1
2.8
3
2.8
3 .7
5.1 .••
3.7
3.2
4.4
3.3
3.3
2.9
2.6
4
4.2
3
2.7
3.2
3.2
2.7
2.6
2.4
16 .1
4
2.6
2.8
2.7
2.4
2.6
3.4
3.3
3.6
3
2.7
2.8
(not any one specific ND
-------
15:33:59
15:34:59
15:35:59
15:36:59
15:37:59
15:38:59
15:39:59
15:40:59
15:41:59
15:42:59
15:43:59
15:44:59
15:45:59
15:46:59
15:47:59
15:48:59
15:49:59
15:50:59
15:51:59
15:52:59
15:53:59
15:54:59
15:55:59
15:56:59
15:57:59
15:58:59
15:59:59
16:00:59
16:01:59
16:02:59
16:03:59
16:04:.59
16:05:59
16:06:59
•16:07:59
16:08:59
16:09:59
16:10:59
16:11:59
16:12:59
16:13:59
160.9
160.5
160.5
161.6
162.8
162.2
162.7
162.7
162.4
162.7
163.2
163.3
162.5
162.8
164.5
165.1
165.7
165
165.6
164.6
165.9
164.8
164.8
164.7
164.7
163.9
164.2
164.8
165.1
164.2
164.5
162.9
162.2
162.2
161.9
162.4
163.2
162.6
173
189.6
198.9
146.9
147.3
145.5
147.5
146.3
151.8
151.7
151.3
150.5
150.1
149.2
150.1
149
147.9
151
151.1
151
151.9
150.6
145.2
146.1
148.2 In
144.9
139.8
142.8
143,6
147.9
144.3
150
151
149.5
150.9
151.9
143.7
145.5
143.2
155.2
148
143.7
141.8
140.9
2.1
2.4
2.3
1.5
2.4
1.7
1.6
1.9
2.3
2.3
2
1.9
1.6
2.1
2.7
2.1
1.8
2.2
4.2
2.4
2
Transition
'.
(not any one specific ND
3.2
4.4
4.8
2.3
2.5
1.2
5.3
8.7
2.1
2.7
2.3
1.6
2.9
3
2.2
2.8
2.9
5.1
6.9
Run avgs. 165.6 146.3 2.2 3.4 3.5
r'l-'-""' .''.:''.'*•
•• .!.V!*ifV
:':KS>^Jv:iV
-------
Client: PES/Lasco Test Location: Open 9&10/NDOs Condition 7
1 Min. Averages Run number 2
Time Open 10 Open 9 NDO C NDO A NDO B
ppm %/ppm %/ppm %/ppm %/ppm
17:05:45
17:06:45
17:07:45
17:08:45
17:09:45
17:10:45
17:11:45
17:12:45
17:13:45
17:14 :45
17:15:45
17:16:45
17:17:45
17:18:45
17:19:45
17:20:45
17:21:45
17:22:45
17:23:45
17:24:45
17:25:45
17:26:45
17:27:45
17:28:45
17:29:45
17:30:45
17:31:45
17:32:45
17:33:45
17:34 :45
17:35:45
17:36:45
17:37:45
17:38:45
17:39:45
17:40:45
17:41:45
17:42:45
17:43:45
17:44:45
17:45:45
17:46:45
17:47:45
17:48:45
160.8
170.7
168.8
169.4
169.1
169
170.5
170.2
170.1
171
168.9
168
167.5
168.6
168.1
166.3
167.2
167.5
167.8
168.9
168.4
167.9
167.7
168.1
168.1
166.7
168.4
169.1
170
170.7
169.8
168.9
167.7
168.8
168.8
167.3
167.8
167.4
167.9
167.7
166.2
167.6
167.1
166.7
112.6
116
121.5
119.4
115.5
120
121.3
118.6
122.6
124.3
118.4
119.5
118
117
121.9
119.7
119.7
116.1
118.8
118.6
119.3
117.5
117.1
119.9
118.8
122.1
120.4
120.2
122.5
122.4
119.9
121.8
118.1
119.2
119.4
124
117.9
120.5
121.3
11.7 . 5
120.6
123.4
122.7 In Transition
124 2.9
1.9
2
2
2
1.9
1.9
2.1
2.2
2.1
2.2
2
2.3
2.3
- 2.1
2.2
2.2
2.1
2.1
1.7
1.7
1.5
1.7
1.5
1.6
2
2.3
2.2
2.2
2
2.2
1.9
2.1
2.4
2.6
2
1.9
1.7
2.2
2.3
2
2.1
2.1
(not any one specific ND
-------
17:49:45
17:50:45
17:51:45
17:52:45
17:53:45
17:54:45
17:55:45
17:56:45
17:57:45
17:58:45
17:59:45
18:00:45
18:01:45
18:02:45
18:03:45
18:04:45
18:05:45
18:06:45
18:07:45
18:08:45
18:09:45
18 :10 :45
18:11:45
18:12:45
18:13 :45
18:14:45
18:15:45
18:16:45
18:17:45
18:18:45
18:19:45
18:20:45
18:21:45
18:22:45
18:23:45
18:24:45
18:25:45
18:26:45
18:27:45
18:28:45
167.7
168.4
168.8
168.8
167.5
168.4
168.4
168.1
168.3
168.5
168.3
167.4
166.9
167.9
168.4
167.9
166.8
166.6
168
169.4
170.1
168.1
168.9
168.5
167.6
167.3
167.6
167
165.5
163.7
165.6
.166.6
167.7
168.2
168
168.1
167.7
167.8
167.5
168.5
120.3
125
126.1
125
123.7
126.9
125
124.4
125.6
123.1
122.2
122.3
125.2
124.9
124.2
123.9
120.5
123.8
123.7
125.2
124.4
125.5
121.7
123.7
125.4
123.4
122.8 In
125.3
123.6
122.3
122.9
126.8
122.4
123.5
123.2
128.9
128.1
121.9
124.6
122.5
1.4
2.1
2.6
2.6
2.2
1.8
2.1
1.5
3.4
1.7
1.7
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.3
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.5
0.9
1
0.7
3.9
3.9
Transition
(not any one specific ND
1.3
0.9
0.7
0.8
1.6
2.3
2.6
2.8
2.2
4.1
10
10.6
10.1
Run avgs. 168.0 121.8 1.5 2.0 3.8
-------
Project ID: 97-14?? Date: 05-20-1997 Start Time: 19:12:53
Client: PES/Lasco Test Location: Open 9&10/NDOs Condition 7
1 Min. Averages Run number 3 (NOTE: Data Lost = JUM Unlit)
Time Open 10 Open 9 NDO C NDO A NDO B
ppm %/ppm %/ppm %/ppm %/ppm
19:13 :59
19:14:59
19:15:59
19:16:59
19:17:59
19:18:59
19:19:59
19:20:59
19:21:59
19:22:59
19:23:59
19:24:59
19:25:59
19:26:59
19:27:59
19:28:59
19:29:59
19:30:59
19:31:59
19:32:59
19:33 :59
19:34:59
19:35:59
19:36:59
19:37:59
19:38:59
19:39:59
19:40:59
19:41:59
19:42:59
19:43:59
19:44:59
19:45:59
19:46:59
19:47:59
19:48:59
19:49:59
19:50:59
19:51:59
19:52:59
19:53:59
19:54:59
19:55:59
152.5
160.7
161.5
161.6
162
161
161.9
161.8
162.1
163 .1
162.4
163.6
Data Lost
Data Lost
Data Lost
Data Lost
Data Lost
Data Lost
Data Lost
Data Lost
Data Lost
Data Lost
Data Lost
Data Lost
Data Lost
Data Lost
Data Lost
Data Lost
Data Lost
Data Lost
Data Lost
Data Lost
Data Lost
Data Lost
Data Lost
Data Lost
Data Lost
Data Lost
Data Lost
Data Lost
165.4
151.4
152.2
111.5
120.2
123.3
120.7
119.1
119.9
118.6
119.1
120.7
118.5
122.8
119.7
117.1
121.6
121
118.1
120.3
120.4
121.5
120.3
121
118.5
118.7
120.5
119.9
117.4
122.1
119.5
122.8
122.6
119.1
119
120.8
123.3
118.4
118.9
119.7
121.9
118.6
121.2
117.6
114.7
116 In Transition
1.7
1.5
1.5
1.6
2
2
1.9
2.1
2
2.1
2.2
2
2.2
1.8
1.5
1.6
1.6
1.8
2
1.6
1.6
1.7
1.3
1.6
1.9
1.9
1.8
1.9
1.8
1.8
1.9
1.8
1.9
1.9
;. , 9
.: . 2
2.3
2.2
2.2
2.3
1.8
2.6
(not any one specific ND
-------
19:56:59
19:57:59
19:58:59
19:59:59
20:00:59
20:01:59
20:02:59
20:03:59
20:04:59
20:05:59
20:06:59
20:07:59
20:08:59
20:09:59
20:10:59
20:11:59
20:12:59
20:13:59
20:14:59
20:15:'59
20:16:59
20:17:59
20:18:59
20:19:59
20:20:59
20:21:59
20:22:59
20:23:59
20:24:59
20:25:59
20:26:59
20:27:59
20:28:59
20:29:59
20:30:59
20:31:59
20:32:59
20:33:59
20:34:59
20:35:59
20:36:59
153.9
155.9
156
156.6
157.2
157.3
158.4
158.8
158.4
157.1
155.6
155.4
155.9
156.4
157.5
156.9
155.7
156
157.2
158.3
159.3
162.1
162.8
163.2
163.7
164.7
164.7
165.3
166.7
168.1
168.5
168.6
168.4
168.2
169.1
170 .
169.4
168.3
168.4
169.5
168.1
121.6
120.9
117.5
117.1
118.5
120.6
119.2
117.7
121.3
117.3
114.5
118
120.6
117.4
92.9
81.6
73.5
71.8
67.8
64.1
62.7
59.7
59
57.8 In
62.2
59.8
60.6
59.2
68.8
83.4
97.6
109.6
116.7
122
124.4
124.9
126
125.9
129.4
129.8
130.9
0.9
0.8
0.9
0.9
0.7
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
0.9
1
1.2
1.1
1.2
0.9
0.9
0.8
1
2
1.2
1.1
1.5
1.2
Transition
A
1
(not any one specific ND
l
0.8
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.5
0.7
4.7
4.1
3.3
1.6
1.4
1.8
Run avgs. 161.3 109.9 1.0 1.9 1.4
-------
Project ID: 97-14?? Date: 05-22-1997 Start Time: 07:52:35
Client: PES/EPA Test Location: Open/ndo Condition 8
1 Min. Averages Run number 1
Time Open 10 Open 9 NDO C NDO A NDO B
ppm %/ppm %/ppm %/ppm %/ppm
07:53:41
07:54:41
07:55:41
07:56:41
07:57:41
07:58:41
07:59:41
08:00:41
08:01:41
08:02:41
08:03 :41
08:04:41
08:05:41,;.
08:06:41
08:07:41
08:08:41
08:09:41
08:10:41
08:11:41
08:12:41
08:13:41
08:14:41
08:15:41
08:16:41
08:17:41
08:18:41
08:19:41
08:20:41
08 :21:41
08:22:41
08:23:41
08:24:41
08:25:41
08:26:41
08:27:41
08:28:41
08:29:41
08:30:41
08:31:41
08:32:41
08733 :41
08:34:41
08:35:41
62.8
63.7
64.4
63.8
63.7
64
62.8
61.2
62.1
63.1
64.2
64.2
64.9
64.9
63.6
63.7
64.9
62.5
61.7
61.5
62.1
62.8
64.8
63.3
63.2
62.5
61.7
61.4
61.9
62.9
. 62.1
60.9
60.6
61.5
61.7
60.9
61.2
61.4
62.3
62.5
62.8
62.2
59.2
126.2
130
131.9
131.1
127.5
124.9
127
124.2
128.4
128.8
127.4
128.3
107.2
84.7
69.7
61.3
58.5
72.9
86.4
86
89
87.4
87.2
90.7
88
83
85.5
93.8
107.6
114.7
117.1
117
121.9
124.9
125.9
127.7
124.7
129.7
125.5
127.4
128.6
127.2
124.1
10.1
9.9
10
11
11.3
10.9
12
12
12.5
12.2
12
12
• 11.8
11.1
9.6
11.5
11.6
11.8
10.1
10.6
10.5
10.3
11.8
11
12.5
11.3
9.9
10.9
11
10.9
10.9
10.6
10.6
10.6
10.4
10.2
10.4
10.4
10.4
10.6
10.8
10.5
10.6
-------
08:36:41
08:37:41
08:38:41
08:39:41
08:40:41
08:41:41
08:42:41
08:43 :41
08:44 :41
Run avgs .
58.5
60.8
60
60.5
62.5
63.7
62.9
60.4
60.4
62.4
125.2 In
128.4
130.8
132.4
131.5
128.4
129.1
125.8
129
112.9
Transition (not any one specific ND
13.6
8.8
5.6
4.4
2.8
3 .4
4.9
5.7
6.2 11.0 No Data
-------
Project ID: 97-14?? Date: 05-22-1997 Start Time: 09:19:33
Client: PES/EPA Test Location: Open/ndo Condition 8
1 Min. Averages Run number 2
Time Open 10 Open 9 NDO C NDO A NDO B
ppm %/ppm %/ppm %/ppm %/ppm
09:20:39
09:21:39
09:22:39
09:23:39
09:24:39
09:25.:39
09:26:39
09:27:39
09:28:39
09:29:39
09:30:39
09:31:39
09:32:39
09:33:39
09:34 :39
09:35:39
09:36:39
09:37:39
09:38:39
09:39:39
09:40:39
09:41:39
09:42:39
09:43:39
09:44:39
09:45:39
09:46:39
09:47:39
09:48 :39
09:49:39
09:50:39
09:51:39
09:52:39
09:53:39
09:54:39
09:55:39
09:56:39
09:57:39
09:58:39
09:59:39
10:DO:39
10:01:39
10:02:39
54.6
56.4
54.1
53.5
54.4
54.5
55.6
57
58
59
60
60.2
60.1
62.5
61.9
62.9
64.6
66.1
66.2
66.1
67
66.1
64.5
66.3
68.1
68.2
64.9
66.4
66.8
65.1
65.2
64.5
63.8
63.2
62.7
65.4
65.3
64.4
63.7
64.7
65
64.3
64.1
49.2
60.5
74.2
98
113.2
121.8
130
134.6
137.1
138.1
137.7
136.5
135.9
137.5
135.2
134.1
132.8
133.5
131.5
131.5
133.5
133.7
134.8
132.4
130.5
131.8
132.6
137.9
139
138.5
136.3
133.2
132.1
133.5
136.2
137.1
136.7
140
142.9
141.9
138.8
136.5
135
5.1
5.1
4.8
5.5
6.5
6.2
6.9
6.5
7.1
6.7
7.5
8
. 7.1
. 7.5
6.9
6.7
5.4
6.1
5.8
4.5
5.4
4.9
4.7
4.7
4.6
4.9
4.8
5.7
6.7
6.7
5.3
5
4.6
4.4
5
4.1
5.2
5
4.8
5.3
4.6
3.8
4.3
-------
10:03 :39
10:04 :39
10:05:39
10:06:39
10:07:39
10:08:39
10:09:39
10:10:39
10:11:39
10:12:39
10:13 :39
10:14:39
10:15:39
10:16:39
10:17:39
10:18:39
10:19:39
10:20:39
10:21:39
10:22:39
10:23:39
10 :24 :39
10:25:39
10:26:39
10:27:39
10:28:39
10:29:39
10:30:39
10:31:39
10:32:39
10:33:39
10:34:39
10:35:39
10:36:39
10:37:39
10:38:39
10:39:39
10:40:39
10:41:39
10:42:39
10:43:39
10:44:39
10:45:39
10:46:39
10:47:39
10:48:39
10:49:39
62.7
61.8
62.3
64.4
63.7
62.1
62.4
63.9
• 62.7
63.3
63.1
63.1
62.1
60.7
60.2
61
60.7
61.2
59.8
59.1
59.9
56.7
56.6
57.2
58.7
62
65.9
68
70.6
72.7
72.9
72.6
71.9
71.2
71.4
72.4
72.6
74.7
75.2
74.5
73.8
74.2
73.1
73.4
74.3
73.3
72.8
136.5
136.5
133.1
136.5 In
137
140.9
140.6
139.8
140.8
141.3
140.1
137
138.5
137.1
136.1
137.9
136.1
137.4
136.4
125.8
130.1
127.1
126.2
125.9
128 In
129.9
129.7
129.7
129.4
131.3
131.7
130.6
134
135.1
134.2
133.7 .
131.7
132.8
132.7
134.1
132.9
137.1
136
135.5
135.8
134.7
134.3
Transition
3.9
3.1
3
2.3
2
2.6
3.2
3.2
3 .7
3.1
3.6
2.3
2.6
4
4 .5
2.6
2.2
1.8
1.8
3.5
Transition
5
5.1
5.1
(not any one specific ND
(not any one specific ND
3
2.3
2
1.7
3
3.6
2.6
2.2
2.4
2.2
2.3
2.6
2.1
2.2
1.8
1.7
2.2
1.8
2.1
2.2
4.1
5.6
Run avgs. 64.4 131.5 3.0 5.6 2.5
-------
Project ID: 97-14?? Date: 05-22-1997 Start Time: 11:39:03
Client: PES/EPA Test Location: Open/ndo Condition 8
1 Min. Averages Run number 3
Time Open 10 Open 9 NDO C NDO A NDO B
ppm %/ppm %/ppm %/ppm %/ppm
11:40:09
11:41:09
11:42:09
11:43:09
11:44:09
11:45:09
11:46:09
11:47:09
11:48:09
11:49:09
11:50:09
11:51:09
11:52:09
11:53:09
11:54:09
11:55:09
11:56:09
11:57:09
11:58:09
11:59:09
12:00:09
12:01:09
12:02:09
12:03:09
12:04:09
12:05:09
12:06:09
12:07:09
12 :08 :09
12:09:09
12:10:09
12:11:09
12:12:09
12:13:09
12:14:09
12:15:09
12:16:09
12:17:09
12:18:09
12:19:09
12:20:09
12:21:09
12:22:09
99.4
102.8
102
100.1
99.3
99.2
99.6
100.4
100.9
100.6
100.5
100.3
101.2.
100.5 •"*.;,.
99.1 '"
98.5
98.7
97.4
96.9
98.1
98.5
99
98.9
98.8
97.2
96.1
97.9
97.6
97.4
97.1
96
97.1
96.9
95.6
96
96
96.4
95.8
96.1
97
97.1
96.1
96.8
130. 2 No Data From NDOs this Run, JUM Proble
131.7
131.8 ,
130 . '
129
130.3
128.7
130.9
129.3
129.6
130.8
132.8
130
133
130.7
134.8
135.8
134.5
135.3
136
132.8
131.3
129.3
133.4
131.7
133.3
136.1
131.6
131.9
129.6
125.7
125.5
126.7
122
121.3
126.4
131
125.8
128.1
127.9
127
125.8
133.1 •
-------
12:23:09
12:24:09
12:25:09
12:26:09
12:27:09
12:28:09
12:29:09
12:30:09
12:31:09
12:32:09
12:33:09
12:34:09
12:35:09
12:36:09
12:37:09
12:38:09
12:39:09
12:40:09
12:41:09
12:42:09
12:43:09
12:44:09
12:45:09
12:46:09
12:47:09
12:48:09
12:49:09
12:50:09
12:51:09
12:52:09
12:53 :09
12:54:09
12:55:09
12:56:09
12:57:09
12:58:09
12:59:09
13:00:09
13:01:09
13 :02:09
13 :03:09
13:04:09
13:05:09
13:06:09
13:07:09
13:08:09
13:09:09
98.1
97.7
97.7
97.8
98.2
101.7
104.8
103.9
103.5
101.9
104.4
101.7
100
100.6
101.4
99.1
96.9
95.8
94.8
94.9
96.5
96.8
96.7
97.4
98.3
99.5
101.3
101.7
102.3
104.5
107.4
107.4
107.5
109.4
108.7
112
113.5
113.8
113.8
113.5
112.9
111.8
110.8
110.7
110.2
110.6
110.3
129.1
126.1
127.8
130.3
127
128.5
129.1
126.9
126.9
123.9
128.1
129.5
126.1
122.6
122.2
122.7
126.6
126.5
,126.1
,'. 123.4
123.2
116.5
83
60.8
46.4
37.9
32.9
30.8
38.9
51.3
58.8
63.8
66.7
69.2
69.8
71.9
75.4
73.7
69.5*
66.1
68.9
74.7
80.4
78.1
75.8
78.1
81
Run avgs. 101.1 110.8 No Data From NDOs this Run, JUM Proble
-------
Project ID: 97-14?? Date: 05-22-1997 Start Time: 18:02:05
Client: PES/EPA Test Location: Open/NDO Condition 9
1 Min. Averages Run number 1
Time Open 10 Open 9 NDO C NDO A NDO B
ppm %/ppm %/ppm %/ppm %/ppm
18:03:11
18:04:11
18:05:11
18:06:11
18:07:11
18:08:11
18:09:11
18:10:11
18:11:11
18:12:11
18:13 :11
18:14:11
18:15:l:i
18:16:11
18:17:11
18:18:11
18:19:11
18:20:11
18:21:11
18:22:11
18:23 :11
18:24:11
18:25:11
18:26:11
18:27:11
18:28:11
18:29:11
18:30:11
18:31:11
18:32:11
18:33 :11
18:34:11
18:35:11
18:36:11
18:37:11
18:38:11
18:39:11
18:40:11
18:41:11
18:42:11
18:43:11
18:44:11
192.9
205.9
211.7
210.4
216.5
220.7
221.1
219.5
221.5
223
224.3
223.8
225.4 r
232.1
228
224
224.. 1
226
230.5
227.8
223.5
221.7
220.2
222.6
220
218.3
223.3
222.6
225.5
227
224.3
220.1
218.8
221.7
228.6
227.6
223.8
224.7
230.7
234.5
235.4
231.3
65.6
63,9
65.7
64.4
62.3
65.8
65.9
65.6
64.4
64.7
61.8
62.2.
62.2
61.2
65
64.3
63.9
63.5
64.9
63.5
65.7
68.1 In Transition
68.4 2.6
72 2.3
78.3 5.6
78.1 2.1
76.9 1.8.
77.7 2.1
78.2 2.7
77.8 2.9
77.7 2.2
71.6 2.9
66.6 In Transition
64.2
62.3
64
64.4
66.8
67.8
66.3
60.7
60.4
3.6
4.2
2.8
3
3.4
4
3.7
3.2
3 .8
2.8
2.5
3
2.7
2.8
2.8
3.1
2.5
3.8
4.1
3
3.1
(not any
(not any
•
'.
one specific ND
one specific ND
1.9
2
2.1
2.8
2.6
3.7
2.7
3.2
3.2
-------
Run avgs. 222.7 67.0 2.7 3.2 2.7
4*1
-------
Project ID: 97-14?? Date: 05-22-1997 Start Time: 19:59:59
Client: PES/EPA Test Location: oven/ndo condition 10
1 Min. Averages Run number 1
Time Open 10 Open 9 NDO C NDO A NDO B
ppm %/ppm %/ppm %/ppm %/ppm
20:01:05
20:02:05
20:03 :05
20:04:05
20:05:05
20:06:05
20:07:05
20:08:05
20:09:05
20:10:05
20:11:05
20:12:05
20:13 :05
20:14:05
20:15:05
20:16:05
20:17:05
20:18:05
20:19:05
20:20:05
20:21:05
20:22:05
20:23:05
20:24:05
20:25:05
20:26:05
20:27:05
20:28:05
20 :29 :05
20:30:05
20:31:05
20:32:05
20:33:05
20:34:05
20:35:05
20:36:05
20:37:05
20:38:05
20:39:05
20:40:05
20:41:05
20:42:05
20:43:05
175.9
184.2
183.2
180.1
179.3
181.6
182.9
185.1
187.4
186.3
185.3
185.3
186.3
188.5
188.8
184.9
187.5
190.7
187.1
187.7
184.8
185.8
187.6
186.5
189.1
192.5
192
191.6
190.8
193.8
205.5
206.7
209.9
204.9
194.7
191.2
191.5
193.1
191.9
190.3
188.2
188.2
187.7
66.3
69.5
82.1
91.6
104
105.9
105.2
110
107.4
108.3
109.1
109.4
112
112.6
108.9
113
115.8
111.2
108.6
111.3
112.4
109.4
110.3
115.4
117.6 In Transition
118.6 3
112.7 2.4
110.6 2.6
117 2.8
117.4 2.7
113.4 2.6
117.1 2.6
113.9 2.6
112.4 2.6
112 2.4
114.8 2.5
116.5 In Transition
116.3
118.7
117.2
114.9
117.1
120.5
2.9
3.1
3 ;
2.. 9 •'
2.9
3.2
3.3
3.1
4.3
3.5
3.9
4.7
4.1
4
4.1
4.2
4.1
4.5
4.3
3.6
3.5
4.7
4.3
4.3
(not any one specific ND
(not any one specific ND
2.5
2.4
2.6
2.5
2.6
2.6
-------
20:44:05
20:45:05
20:46:05
20-47:05
20:48:05
20:49:05
20:50:05
186.2
184.7
184.7
188.8
191.9
195.8
207.4
122.5
122.9
124.3
119.6
117.2
115
114.8
2.5
2.5
2.6
2.7
2.8
2.7
2.7
Run avgs. 189.5 110.9 2.6 3.8 2.6
-------
Project ID: 97-3020 Date: 05-23-1997 Start Time: 09:12:51
Client: pes/epa Test Location: oven/ndo condition 11
1 Min. Averages Run number 1 •
Time Open 10 Open 9 NDO C NDO A NDO B
ppm %/ppm %/ppm %/ppm %/ppm
09:13 :57
09:14:57
09:15:57
09:16:57
09:17:57
09:18:57
09:19:57
09:20:57
09:21:57
09:22:57
09:23:57
09:24:57
09:25:57
09:26:57
09:27:57
09:28:57
09:29:57
09:30:57
09:31:57
09:32:57
09:33:57
09:34:57
09:35:57
09:36:57
09:37:57
09:38:57
09:39:57
09:40:57
09:41:57
09:42:57
09:43:57
09:44:57
09:45:57
09:46:57
09:47:57
09:48:57
09:49:57
09:50:57
09:51:57
09:52:57
09:53:57
09:54:57
09:55:57
254.7
244.7
250.8
249.1
250.6
250.6
250.6
251.9
255.8
260.5
262.1
267.9
278.3
280
277.1
273.3
272.8
275.2
276.4
275.6
274.3
272.6
273 .5
275
275.5
276.4
274.6
271.4
269.1
268.2
268.1
267.9
266.5
266.9
269.1
267.1
265.2
264
264.9
263.9
263.1
260.3
265.4
65.8
62
61.7
59.7
58.7
60.3
61.8
60.2
59.9
56.5
57.9
57.6
58.8
58.6
58.7
58.5
57.8
55.2
54.3
59.3
57.6
59.5
62
60.7
59.8
57
58.7
56.6
58.3
57.2
59.2
58.3
61
59
58.4
58.1 In Transition
58 3.2
58.6 3
60 2.7
57.6 2.4
57.9 3.2
58.3 3.9
58 4.5
10.3
11.7
10.8
11.3
9.3
10.8
10
9.9
8.3
8.5
7.5
8.9
9.1
7.7
6.4
6.8
7.5
8.4
7.1
6.6
7.7
8.5
7.3
7.3
7
7.9
8.2
7.3
7
5.7
5.3
6.3
6.9
6.2
6.2
(not any one specific ND
-------
09
09
09
09
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
:56
:57
:58
:59
:00
:01
:02
:03
:04
:05
:06
:07
:08
:09
:10
:11
:12
:13
:14
:15
:57
:57
:57
:57
:57
:57
:57
:57
:57
:57
:57
:57
:57
:57
:57
:57
:57
:57
:57
:57
266.
255.
264.
271.
270.
267.
269.
271.
275.
277 .
279.
279.
28
281.
284.
285.
285.
281.
281.
287.
6
2
9
8
5
7
1
6
2
6
7
7
0
8
8
5
3
6
9
1
57
55
59
58
60
60
59
58
62
58
60
59
58
58
61
60
62
60
61
63
.9
.1
.2
.8
.6
.4
.4
.3
.2
.2 In
.8
.7
.1
.6
.4
.4
.4
.6
.8
.5 •
4
3.3
3
3.4
3.1
3.6
3.3
3.8
3
Transition
(not any one
1
2
1
0
0
1
1
1
1
1
specific ND
.7
.1
.4
.9
.7
.7
.2
.4
.8
.8
Run avgs. 269.2 59.2 3.3 8.0 1.5
-------
Project ID: 97-3020 Date: 05-23-1997 Start Time: 10:40:23
Client: pes/epa Test Location: oven/ndo condition 11
1 Min. Averages Run number 2
Time Open 10 Open 9 NDO C NDO A NDO B
ppm %/ppm %/ppm %/ppm %/ppm
10:41:29
10:42:29
10:43 :29
10:44:29
10:45:29
10:46:29
10:47:29
10:48:29
10:49:29
10:50:29
10:51:29
10:52:29
10:53 :£9
10:54 :29'
10:55:29
10:56:29
10:57:29
10:58:29
10:59:29
11:00:29
11:01:29
11:02:29
11:03:29
11:04 :29
11:05:29
11:06:29
11:07:29
11:08:29
11:09:29
11:10:29
11:11:29
11:12:29
11:13:29
11:14:29
11:15:29
11:16:29
11:17:29
11:18:29
11:19:29
11:20:29
11:21:29
263
284.5
282.9
276.6
274
275.6
277.1
277.4
282.7
282.9
284.8
288.1
289.2
287.6
286.6
287.4
284.9
282.4
279.2
278.1
279.7
285.3
298
289
286.4
284.6
284.7
284.6
283.4
283.2
281.2
282.1
283.5
286.7
286.2
285.8
285.3
286.7
287.8
289.7
287.1
63.5
63.6
65
64.3
65.3
64.5
67.6
69 . 1
68.3
65.4
58.8
60.1
66.6
.69.3
69.4
69.4
67
61.2
66.7
67.1
67.8
69.1
68.2
70.1
71.4 In
68.6
69.1
67.3
70.9
70.2
69.6
72.4
71.6
71.2
70.2
70.1
71 In
69.7
68.2
69.9
69.3
Transition
1.5
1.1
0.6
0.6
0.6
1.5
1.1
, 0.9
0.7
1
1.5
Transition
5.4
4.6
5.3
4.8
4.8
4.5
4.1
4.2
6.3
5.7
6.6
6.1
5.4
4.6
3.9
3.5
2.9
4.5
5.6
5
5.1
5.2
5.6
5.7
(not any one specific ND
(not any one specific ND
1.1
1
0.9
0.5
Run avgs.
283.6
67.8
1.0
5.0
0.9
-------
Project ID: 97-14?? Date: 05-23-1997 Start Time: 12:00:47
Client: pes/epa Test Location: oven/ndo condition 11
1 Min. Averages Run number 3
Time Open 10 Open 9 NDO C NDO A NDO B
ppm %/ppm %/ppm %/ppm %/ppm
12:01:53
12:02:53
12:03:53
12:04:53
12:05:53
12:06:53
12:07:53
12:08:53
12:09:53
12:10:53
12:11:53
12:12:53
12:13:53
12:14:53
12:15:53
12:16:53
12:17:53
12:18:53
12:19:53
12:20:53
12:21:53
12:22:53
12:23:53
12:24 :53
12:25:53
12:26:53
12:27:53
12:28:53
12:29:53
12:30:53
12:31:53
12:32:53
12:33:53
12:34:53
12:35:53
12:36:53
12:37:53
12:38:53
12:39:53
12:40:53
12:41:53
12:42:53
267.1
267.9
264.7
267.1
267.7
266.6
265
264.7
264.3
262.8
261.2
258.7
258.9
258.6
265.2
264.8
262.8
265.1
271.1
273
272
268.1
264.4
265.7
265.6
269.6
274.6
279.6
286
286.2
288.8
288.2
288.1
288.6
287.3
286.4
284.5
286.1
284.2
286.3
288.6
291.9
72.5
73.7
70.7
69.5
67.6
69.1
72
73.9
76.4
76.6
77.4
75.7
71.3
67.1
70.3
72.3
73.5
71.9
69.2
69.9
69.6
71.3
71.7
72.7
74.1 In
71.2
68.8
68.6
70.6
71.7
73
69.2
69.1
71
70.6
73.7
73.6
74.2 In
72.5
69.8
66
69.3
•
Transition
1
1.2
0.7
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.2
, 0.2
0.5
1.4
1.2
1.3
Transition
.3.8
3.8
4.9
3.9
4.1
3.9
4.3
4.1
4.3
4.3
4.1
3 .4
3-4
3\'7 -\;
3 .2
4
3.8
4.1
3 .9
3.7
3.5
3.7
3.6
3.8
(not any one specific ND
(not any one specific ND
1.8
2
3.5
5.2
icu
-------
Run avgs. 273.3 71.5 0.8 3.9 3.1
-------
Project ID: 97-3020 Date: 05-29-1997 Start Time: 08:35:41
Client: PES/EPA Test Location: Oven/NDO Condition 12
1 Min. Averages Run number 1
Time Open 10 Open 9 NDO C NDO A NDO B
ppm %/ppm %/ppm %/ppm %/ppm
08:36:47
08:37:47
08:38:47
08:39:47
08:40:47
08:41:47
08:42:47
08:43 :47
08:44:47
08:45:47
08:46:47
08:47:47
08:48:47
08:49:47
08:50:47
08 :51:47
08:52:47
08:53:47
08:54 :47
08:55:47
08:56:47
08:57:47
08:58:47
08:59:47
09:00:47
09:01:47
09:02:47
09:03:47
09:04:47
09:05:47
09:06:47
09:07:47
09:08:47
09:09:47
09:10:47
09:11:47
09:12:47
09:13:47
09:14:47
09:15:47
09716:47
09:17:47
09:18:47
163.4
166.8
165.6
171.5
175.3
178.9
177.6
211.2
245.2
250.5
242.9
237
227.6
223
222
223.4
221.4
216.9
215.3
219.3
224
227.2
229.5
231.8
233.3
234
233.5
235.2
237.9
241.3
242.8
243.4
244.6
244.1
247.5
268.5
268.8
258.9
256
258.9
263.4
265.9
267.7
73.7
76.2
79
97. .2
113.3
115.8
94.6
95.5
93 .9
94.8
96.9
95.1
96.3
96
97.3
99.7
101.7
100
101.8
99.5
98
98.6
95.9
87
79.2
85
96.1
104.1
109.5
110.7
109.2 In Transition
109.4 1.8
112.6 ,1.6
105.4 1.6
87 1.4
85.3 1.3
79.8 1.3
78.3 1.5
76.2 1.5
81.7 1.4
92.6 1.5
101.9 1.5
107.4 1.7
11.5
11.7
11.4
11.8
11.5
10.8
11.1
11
11.6
10.6
11.6
9.8
11.1
11.2
11.5
10
10.9
10.5
10.9
12.5
11.8
10.6
10.3
10.9
10.4
10.5
9.3
9.7
9.2
8.5
(not any one specific ND
-------
09:19:47
09:20:47
09:21:47
09:22:47
09:23:47
09:24:47
09:25:47
09:26:47
09:27:47
09:28:47
09:29:47
09:30:47
09:31:47
09:32:47
09:33 :47
09:34 :47
09:35:47
Run avgs .
269.5
271.7
272.7
272.7
.273.2
273.2
273
272.3
272.3
272.4
272.5
274.4
273 .8
274.9
276.2
275rl
272.5
240.9
115.2 1.6
120.1 1.6
120.4 In Transition
122.8
123.9
124.6
126.7
125.3
121.6
122
126.6
122.6
124.7
126
126.1
125.9
127.2
103.5 1.5
(not any one specific ND
1.5
1.4
1.3
1.2
1.1
1.2
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.6
1.6
10.8 1.4
-------
There was no run 2 for Condition 12.
It was started, but aborted/voided 16 minutes into the run.
-------
Project ID: 97-3020 Date: 05-29-1997 Start Time: 11:04:43
Client: PES/EPA Test Location: Oven/NDO Condition 12
1 Min. Averages Run number 3
Time Open 10 Open 9 NDO C NDO A NDO B
ppm %/ppm %/ppm %/ppm %/ppm
11:05:49
11:06:49
11:07:49
11:08:49
11:09:49
11:10:49
11:11:49
11:12:49
11:13 :49
ll': 14:49
11:15:49
11:16:49
11:17:49
11:18:49
11:19:49
11:20:49
11:21:49
11:22:49
11:23:49
11:24:49
11:25:49
11:26:49
11:27:49
11:28:49
11:29:49
11:30:49
11:31:49
11:32:49
11:33 :49
11:34:49
11:35:49
11:36:49
11:37:49
11:38:49
11:39:49
11:40:49
11:41:49
11:42:49
11:43:49
11:44:49
11:45:49
11:46:49
11:47:49
283.7
278.3
287.6
286.6
284.4
284.1
283.3
282.1
279.9
279.9
278.7
279.9
279.9
279.4
280.2
280.4
285.3
285
286.3
285.5
283.9
283.3
284.1
283.2
282.8
281.3
280.8
280
284.3
294.8
293.6
288
283.7
281.1
278.6
276.6
277.2
277. 8
277.8
276.2
275.5
275.5
276.4
132.4
127.8
130.7
134
131.6
130.6
129.4
130.7
132.4
132.2
127.6
129.2
128.4
130.9
128.6
127.4
127.6
130.2
132.7
131.4
133.5
131.4
130.9
131.4
132.1
132.8
132.6
131.6
131.7
132.2
132.7 In Transition
134.4 0.5
135 0.5
134.6 0.4
132.6 0.5
131.9 0.4
129.8 0.3
131.2 0.3
129.9 0.3
128.5 0.2
128 0.3
129.8 0.2
127.3 0.3
13
12.6
9-5
12.5
12.2
14
12
10.6
12.9
13.3
11.4
15.1
11.1
10.4
12
12.7
13.8
12.3
13.3
12
11.8
12.9
10.1
11.3
12
10.7
11
12.6
11
10.5
(not any one specific ND
-------
11:48:49
11:49:49
11:50:49
11:51:49
11:52:49
11:53 :49
11:54:49
11:55:49
11:56:49
11:57:49
11:58:49
11:59:49
12:00:49
12:01:49
12:02:49
Run avgs .
277.5
277.2
277
276.6
276.2
275.7
277
275.4
276.1
276
275.1
274.9
276.1
276
275.4
280.5
127.9 0.2
127. .1 0.2
128.4 0.3
128.3 In Transition
129.6 In Transition
126.7
127.8
129.7
130.9
130.4
130
128.3
125.5
126.2
127.5
130.3 0.3
(not any one specific
(not any one specific
0.3
0.2
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.2
0.2
12.0 0.2
ND
ND
-------
Project ID: 97-3020 Date: 05-29-1997 Start Time: 12:30:07
Client: PES/EPA Test Location: Oven/NDO Condition 12
1 Min. Averages Run number 4
Time Open 10 Open 9 NDO C NDO A NDO B
ppm %/ppm %/ppm %/ppm %/ppm
12:31:13
12:32:13
12:33:13
12:34:13
12:35:13
12:36:13
12:37:13
12:38:13
12:39:13
12:40:13
12:41:13
12:42:13
12:43:13
12:44:13-*
'l
12:45:13
12:46:13
12:47:13
12:48:13
12:49:13
12:50:13
12:51:13
12:52:13
12:53 :13
12:54:13
12:55:13
12:56:13
12:57:13
12:58:13
12:59:13
13:00:13
13:01:13
13:02:13
13:03:13
13:04:13
13:05:13
13:06:13
13:07:13
13:08:13
13:09:13
13:10:13
13:11:13
13:12:13
13:13:13
252.5
263.1
261
260.2
258.9
258.5
265.8
267.6
260.5
258
260.3
263
255.7
246.6
250.5
253.7
253.4
252.4
251.7
250.2
255.2
260.3
.256.4
251.5
247.4
244.3
245.6
247.7
257.9
271.3
283.4
290
295.2
297.9
302.7
305.9
307.5
311
312.3
313.4
313.9
315.4
315.5
106.9
111.2
109.9
111.8
113.5
113.4
112.3
112.4
113.7
114.9
114 .2
110.3
110.3
110.2
108.5
108.5
113.8
111.4
116.6
128.2
126.3
123.6
125.6
92.8
68
58.7
50.6
44.6
40.2
47.4
61.8 In Transition
70.4 0.5
83.1 0.5
104.4 0.5
120.4 0.3
129.3 0.3
131.4 0.3
132.7 0.2
132.1 0.1
132.3 0.4
136.1 0.2
134.7 0.3
133.9 0.5
9.1
11.1
11
12.8
12.5
12.2
9.8
12.6
10.5
10
8.7
12.2
11.5
10.2
10.9
11.5
11.6
11.3
9.6
12.2
11.1
9.9
10.8
14.1
12.7
11.1
12.2
11.3
11.1
11
(not any one specific ND
-------
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
Ru
:14:13
:15:13
:16:13
:17:13
:18:13
:19:13
:20:13
:21:13
:22:13
:23:13
:24:13
:25:13
:26:13
:27:13
:28:13
:29:13
:30:13
.n avgs .
315
315
3:
317
317
318
318
319
319
319
318
318
319
319
318
320
316
284.
.4
.7
17
.3
.9
.9
.3
.1
.8
.4
.2
.6
.8
.5
.6
.4
.1
3
133
132
132
133
132
129
129
132
133
128
130
134
134
128
130
132
133
112.
.2 0.5
.8 0.4
. 3 In Transition
. 9 In Transition
.2
.7
.7
.3
.5
.1
.6
.9
.9
.6
.1
.3
.5
9 0.4
(not any one
(not any one
0
0
0
0
0
• 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
11.2 0.
specific
specific
.4
.3
.2
.1
.2
.2
.1
.1
.1
0
.1
.3
.2
2
ND
ND
-------
Project ID: 97-3020 Date: 05-29-1997 Start Time: 15:18:45
Client: PES/EPA Test Location: Oven/NDO Condition 13
1 Min. Averages Run number 1
Time Open 10 Open 9 NDO C NDO A NDO B
ppm %/ppm %/ppm %/ppm %/ppm
15:19:51
15:20:53
15:21:53
15:22:53
15:23:53
15:24:53
15:25:53
15:26:53
15:27:53
15:28:53
15:29:;53
15:30:53
15:31:53
15:32:53
15:33:53
15:34:53
15:35:53
15:36:53
15:37:53
15:38:53
15:39:53
15:40:53
15:41:53
15:42:53
15:43:53
15:44:53
15:45:53
15:46:53
15:47:53
15:48:53
15:49:53
15:50:53
15:51:53
15:52:53
15:53:53
15:54:53
15:55:53
15:56:53
15:57:53
15:58:53
15:59:53
16:00:53
16:01:53
307.9
312.6
311.9
312
310.9
310.5
310
308.7
306.8
306.7
304.3
, _304.1
3'0
-------
16:02:53 340.2 125.3 In Transition
16:03:53 340.2 125.9
16:04:53 339.1 127.8
16:05:53 339 125.8
16:06:53 340.2 123.9
16:07:53 339.7 123.5
16:08:53 338.5 125.5
16:09:53 339.8 126.6
16:10:53 339.5 126.8 In Transition
16:11:53 337.7 123.1 In Transition
16:12:53 339.2 124 2 <--
16:13:53 340.8 124.5 1.8
16:14:53 340.5 124.2 1.7
(not any one specific ND
7
5.3
4.3
4
3.4
2.9
2.6
(not any one specific ND
(not any one specific ND
Moved back to NDO C to
make up for previou
lost time
Run avgs
331.8
124.6
1.8
11.7
4.2
-------
Project ID: 97-3020 Date: 05-29-1997 Start Time: 16:37:01
Client: PES/EPA Test Location: Oven/NDO Condition 13
1 Min. Averages Run number 2
Time Open 10 Open 9 NDO C NDO A NDO B
ppm %/ppm %/ppm %/ppm %/ppm
16:38:07
16:39:07
16:40:07
16:41:07
16:42:07
16:43:07
16:44 :07
16:45:07
16:46 :07
16:47:07
16:48:07
16:49:07
16:50:07
16:51:07
16:52:07
16:53 :07
16:54 :07
16:55:07
16:56:07
16:57:07
16:58:07
16:59:07
17:00:07
17:01:07
17:02:07
17:03:07
17:04 :07
17:05:07
17:06 :07
17:07:07
17:08:07
17:09:07
17:10:07
17:11:07
17:12:07
17:13:07
17:14:07
17:15:07
17:16:07
17:17:07
17:18:07
17:19:07
17:20:07
324.3
326.9
329
329.5
304.9
334.3
334.3
334.5
334.7
335.9
336.3
337.5
342.3
344.2
343.4
340.1
335.4
334.9
334.5
333.5
334.7
354.8
382.8
388.2
379.1
356.8
342.4
337.8
339.7
340.9
340.9
337.1
339.2
339.8
339.2
340.6
340.3
340.1
341.5
342.4
343.1
343.3
343.1
130.9
131.5
132
132.1
128.4
132.8
132.8
132
134
132.7
130.7
132.4
133.6
129.9
• 129.3
128.2
125
128.4
131.3
128.9
126.8
126.8
129.7
133.3
133.1
133.7
134.1
134.4
137.6
137.6
133.2 In
132.1
131.6
132.5
132.2
133.3
129.4
126.7
130
131.3
131
127.4
123.6
Transition
2.6
2.2
2
2
1.8
1.6
1.6
1.7
1.7
1.8
1.7
1.8
10.3
10.3
9.7
9.5
11.6
,8.9
9.5
10
11.4
9.3
10.6
8.7
9.9
10.3
11.4
10.8
9.8
9.8
10.1
10.9
10.3
9.2
10.3
12.4
9.8
9.9
10.1
9
10.2
9.2
(not any one specific ND
-------
17:
17:
17:
17:
17:
17:
17:
17:
17:
17:
17:
17:
17:
17:
17:
17:
17:
Run
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
a
:07
:07
:07
:07
:07
•07
:07
:07
:07
:07
:07
:07
:07
:07
:07
:07
:07
vgs.
344
3
342
340
340
341
338
336
336
336
336
335
338
337
3
337
337
340.
.6
43
.3
.2
.4
.1
.5
.6
.9
.8
.9
.4
.2
.3
37
.1
.9
3
121
127
130
129
129
132
131
127
128
128
129
130
129
131
131
133
132
130.
.8 1.7
.4 1.9
.4 In Transition
. 5 In Transition
.9
.9
.7
.8
.5
.6
.3
.1
.9
.7
.9
.8
.1
8 1.9
(not any one
(not any one
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
10.1 'v 1.
specific ND
specific ND
.7
.7
.7
.7
.4
.3
.4
.4
.3
.4
.5 .
.6
.4
5
-------
Project. ID: 97-3020 Date: 05-29-1997 Start Time: 18:01:07
Client: PES/EPA Test Location: Oven/NDO Condition 13
1 Min. Averages Run number 3
Time Open 10 Open 9 NDO C NDO A NDO B
ppm %/ppm %/ppm %/ppm %/ppm
18:02:13
18:03:13
18:04:13
18:05:13
18:06:13
18:07:13
18:08:13
18:09:13
18:10:13
18:11:13
18:12:13
18:13 :13
18:14:13
18:15:13
18:16:13
18:17:13
18:18:13
18:19:13
18:20.:13
18:21:13
18:22:13
18:23:13
18:24:13
18:25:13
18:26:13
18:27:13
18:28:13
18:29:13
18:30 :13
18:31:13
18:32:13
18:33 :13
18:34:13
18:35:13
18:36:13
18:37:13
18:38:13
18:39:13
18:40:13
18:41:13
18:42:13
18:43:13
18:44:13
323.6
322.2
321.8
323.1
323.2
321.9
321.7
322
322
320.8
318.9
316.5
314.4
313.1
311.1
310.1
308.1
303.9
300.9
297.8
308.2
320.6
329.2
337.8
354.2
366.2
360.1
354.3
348.9
349.4
348.2
348.2
348.2
347.1
346.8
346.5
345.5
345.2
345.1
344.5
345.5
344.8
343.2
112
126.1
127.4
127.3
126
126.8
127
125.5
128.7
123.5
116.7
123.1'
119. 8 /
, 118.8
116.8
118.9
118.5
118.3
117.3
117.1
118.7
121.3
122.6
123.7
124.2
124.3
123.6
122.5
121.1
117.4 In
113.3 In
115.2
119
119.5
121.8
121.5
120.8
120.4
122.6
122
122.4
122.1
122.5
Transition
Transition
2.2
1.9
1.8
1.9
1.9
1.8
1.5
1.5
1.7
1.6
1.7
1.7
8.2
10.4 ,.
8 . 3 V
9.7 t-
8.8
11.3
8.9
9.2
11.1
8.4
6.5
7.6
6.9
6.4
8.6
8.4
7
6.8
8.5
8.1
7.7
6
7.1
7.4
7.4
11
13.5
8.2
6.1
(not any one specific ND
(not any one specific ND
-------
18:45:13
18:46:13
18:47:13
18:48:13
18:49:13
18:50:13
18:51:13
18:52:13
18:53:13
18:54:13
18:55:13
18:56:13
18:57:13
18:58:13
18:59:13
19:00:13
19:01:13
342.3
342.5
340.7
341
342.5
342.1
343.2
343.5
341.8
339.1
339.8
340.9
339.8
339.7
338.4
338.3
338.3
119.7 1.7
123.4 In Transition
124.2
118.7
119.7
120.1
121.4
121.3
121.4
123.2
123.9
124.8
125.6
124.9
125.9
126,7
124.5
(not any one specific ND
3.8
3.3
3.3
3.2
4.1
4
4.2
4.1
' 4
4
1.9
1.9
1.7
1.6
1.8
Run avgs. 334.0 .121.8 1.8 8.4 3.1
-------
o
I
ill
jj IN
im
-------
-------
-------
jj!
i MJ iTiTi
-------
-------
l
I i ^FPil I •-»! * I I I I I •
-------
M I I I M { M Mr
"*™TUtf
5 11
-------
_i_ I |_i j I i | ; i :
..LL.1....J-.
r TUMP
-------
I
s
-------
Lls.LUi.UJ k!it 1
UJr'' UUU1
i-M
-------
!6
-------
-------
J. ILJ I
i i .' ,' i i ; r~i~i i !
if 71IffTT
H---H-1 i-fil T
Tniifn
J80
TjT 50!| I li! U i
•-M-J-r-l-—j-i-}-t-i-,-;-t-4-}- -
i i i \r.r.\ i ! l-l it.r\\ \
lU'PUlULlJ?!
JIM Mil
J-UiLI.Lliillj.LLL
-------
I TTH2M i
J f M-J-i
J I.-V . T j _•-» ' k— :
ioo
..L4..!-}.-;-:-,'
-------
iJ40i_Ji Him ILL MMfuuj
• i i 1 1 i 1 i i i T i ; i . I 1 1 : 1 i : i f
Motto
! i MJ ! i I ULl ii1,
~ T T~i"i 1~l~ . . "1 * i" i *"i"T' i i j j
,...- ... _.. ., „.....-.
IJlJi-LLil.
-------
-r-li :'Lj-!iLL)
-------
IJJ UJJJ
UiilLll[aiJ
JJIIlLLUliiiiliUl
U- 4-iJ-U
IMiMM
iliJilili
Jil .Lp-Ll.
I I i : I I ! ! I I
irrniiu
.IMJJILLLU.
TTliTil
-------
E
O
III 1.1' HMli IJ
i^cslTLcrjHf III i i 7 I .
-------
l
ill
-------
2
I
I
-------
Li I i
irrrmr,
uiTnMiiii
li.
jLLUlil
i I ! i I ! ' i
l.LLU.LL! !
liMlJ!!'!
T'.-'
-14-!-114
!H
iiil
JUiilill
III Ml I I
ljiTr
i
! i*Pi 11
-------
GEM Calibration Sheet
Client
Test Site
CEM Operator
Location
Dale "g
y.
-------
CEM CaIibrauon_Slieet
Client: \-4^£C> _ Ciiy: YkteAtje.. K
Source: TTl^
CEM Operator:
Dale: S-M -*r
•.« 4-
-££-
I--.,- li-.:
«— CUI
Biu
«— Ckl
Biu
(OKI
^1— OJ
Biu
!*•(
S>«~ OJ
IMI
1* .'
!»-.)
«)*•
Q.O?
0.1
O.OI
3L1
^L2_
0£_
I&.
l.o
o
-2.H
-af
-2.5
3L*
o.n
7-7
3,.1—CJ
Drift
KJ«I
Diu
(* WOu)
«>*»
(X.CO..)
Dril
W^
«>*)
CUItMi
Biu
X^O
(Oil
Odihnlio*
— cu
Uril
1* .(
0.1
-O.T
0.6
4f.fi
fft.2
0.?
low caiiurauon gas is useu^nly mr lurutne lesung
,| use
ft
-------
CEM Calibration Sheet
Client: L/s.6Cg> Cily: V^W
Source: TTg~ Date: 6- 15 -
CEM Operator:
C«I»«M|«« Bnw
rxl_lTi«>:
(OKI
(X rf*..)
DM
.r^.
(OKI
DHK
(X W 3»..)
(0*1
COilnlio
Dril
(X .1 3^«)
!*•<
Drill
«*•«
0- I
0,2.
3m
5£L
3I.-M
o."7
453.1
O.H
0-7
-O.3L
-o.x.
&.O*
-V.'ir
-o.*.
-iJL
on
-o-a.
(X«40u|
IMA
(* .(S).
Diu
xoro
(OKI
Biu
(X •IOu)
Dril
rf^
(OX»
(OS)
U
^2.
o.\
O.I
0.03
0.
3[
3.0
1.0
o./
low ca
ibraliou gas is used only Iqr turbine lesln
^D A 0, -
KjOA-
*
-------
CEM Calibrauon Sheet
l'.
_*
',
.1
i i
b;
i
(
H
T
,
.'•-.
.?.. •
,
Ct * \
\i J ^
0*j-" •*
c-iW—B—
•BT
|P^
/U
o
3M
*MSI
fifc-fr
)s low cal
C.libxU.
»' -.
CL7
^*1^*
^,^^'
f5«^^
>VT%'
"Hir
- .-'
^'-f- -
fr#t^ <
"v>;>\ c
L.
iiem: re i unv: ir'o/-t->.< ^,
Source: A«^ *> /T«a> Date: r//7/^7
CEM Ope
iralor: /^^/
«-: /
n— 7,-« t.'OO
£Er
, %
£±
(?.V
?>.j
ffa54y.v
e^.7
(X W^.O
•.
BU.
(X.IO.!)
«0*»
O'*i/ff.H
o.*J
>-9^LJ
o.Y
r-,-^. )0'-JO
£±
S:
-^.•7
^r-7
••I""
Biu
(X .(O..I
(OX)
-d).J
Dri*
(OX)
(X .(^..)
(OX)
T9.3.
•I.3
•« ^. •
r.— n.« \O'-10
£E:
£Er
-i"7
V^/2.7
KJ»I
(X WOw)
•O-3
-I-C,
f — ti-, ,3.'/x
£E:
,r-
£E:
£.,/
^4--^
Bin
|» .1 .^..)
BU.
(X .CO.)
(OX)
O-(*
-\>
[Ml
'
Dril
(9.7
OvO<
»— ! *
*-,T,_«/O: J2
s:
- ,
CUOntl
to.y
•/W.a
'•ir
J>**«.» Otl
|K «f OM)
/7.6
*"*!* w
iV-«ll..: /SUj^
Cklilml<-
atomic*
*7
WZJk
»>«— cu
Bk.
(«•!
(OX)
(XHCh.)
.(O*)
-------
CEM Calibration Sheet
Client: PFi City:
Source: 0^^l€> (THc.) Date: *"//*/§ •?
C-..-U.I*.-
VJ—
Ilisi:;;,
S
• *• V*
(» W .•»— J
'C4
lci6
L?
5 1.4
wyv^
W-^
low cal
ifv^»*
$1^^
i^^.
^l"^f%
iN'^i^* ^
S^i-^S
iH|£i^$?
^-vr h\
CEM Ope
.ralor: x>9 /y
«« /
n._ „.., p^C^
•SE:
4 %
£Er
/•O^-o
jkA.
^^c^
W.1
"§r
s
(X .1 0..)
(0X1
l-0/o.l
^Ofi
O.I
r-,-iu.: /P; ?t^>
OLbxio.
-
Sir— .
Cdifcnlio
"O.^.
*rf^.^
Diu
(OX)
Biu
(X WCh.)
•d?.0a
<7.^
1MR
(OX)
UiA
•O.JA
-O.O/
«« ^.
r>«^ r,_. /O'3&
C.Ub.lia«
C.libnlio«
- O-i
«^ri..)
Biu
(X ofth.)
«JX)
-o.oi
».6
r~.-.v.-., /a:
C^lil-.lio.
v.
c—
-0.r
VV* 5)
DM.
«JX(
'•i
Biu
IX'ICH.)
(OX)
-O.os-
-e?.r
7^
Drit
DH«
*0^>?
-o.T
*« ?
l>~T,-./3.-.73_
^P
CUihnU
-ar
•^**
B—'
(OX)
«JX»
-0>0£
•OA
r-u-7,..: /TOO
Olihiuin
.5:
-/j
Vsv.y
«)X)
(X WOu)
.(<»*!
-O-\
o.&t
IX. I
(OX)
1MI
(
-------
CEM Calibration Sheet
Client:
Source: AfD()
CEM Operator:
Dale: S"//1 A 7
7 •'
r-.-n..:
I***..)
Sy.ln.Cd
IMA
(» rf !%..)
(Ml
(X.l^u)
«
(K.fOu)
«>*>
(X .1.^..
10X1
Du
(*.CChi|
K1X)
(X .CO..)
(XrfOu)
IOXJ
.(OX)
0.3
IiiL
;AJL
IM
low calibration gas is used only lor turbine testing.
-------
GEM Calibration Sheet
s* 0'
Client
Test Site At*».Of.*1.
Location F/«
Date r/n
1
CEM Operator
Kun
Run
Kun
7 ( f
Ctlibntlo.
O.U
(X .
Ua
(X of St..)
IVUn
C. * Cm
0-b
•y.
O-1-!
-u
0*1
>. ?
/.
-I./
-C7. 1
-o.i
283
0,1
has-
-a/
-O.I
O .1
0,3
Jli
L4.
1*0
0.1
AO
J
op** 10
,tl 7)
-------
GEM Calibration Sheet
tu*
+»|k
Client
Test Site ty«> 3 /a
CEM Operator
Location
? Date
XT
Run
—, r— I /•'<«"
Run
?**
Kun
ti.i
}*
£4.
-o.oy
(9.3s
O.I
o-
TO 1
1JC
GL
IOJ_
-qo7
II J
1.0
. -7
I-C,
VJT/v
o.
O
-o.l
-OM
iSZil.
JTV.
-0-3
t.
/\/ 0
A/ DC?
S
A "
A -
C '
-------
GEM Calibration Sheet
Client
Location
Test Site ~5^,+. £«yg/»/t. ^AOate
CEM Operator
Run Cft/l &•*>
Run
Run \
uu
(« of ^..1
IWb..
C. AC_
CUilnliuv
H-T-.
IWtCBl
Coi C.
3o.7 Q.
SUV
1
C
r) c?
-------
Client:
CEM Calibiutioii Sheet
_ City:
Date: f"/J / A 7
.«.«•'
CEM Operator: /^ A/
•« U.
10X1
(MR
(*.(*..)
10X1
CUAnlio*
J,-™
Olibnljoa
Jy— cj
Dril
3>.~ 01
Dril
1* •(
!»..|
O.I
-I.I
-O.i
n.o
o
0.2(0. J
^ Q
di
1
O.H
II (o,
m
I
(**<)
liu
.ro
Kill
Biff
^O
«<3X)
(X .1 Ou)
(<)*»
BU.
IX .(Ou)
(0X1
(XWCk.)
IX^Ou)
d) o»
2*.
7.6
8L.G
low calibration gas is used only lor turbine testing.
-------
p«*
o-
0-
CEM Calibration Sheet
Client: P^S^^ City:
Source:
CEM Operator:.
Date:
r>«~. ri.« (J 7 O V
., t
.
IN-. -.71... /
Oil-*.
<*
«3X)
CtObf^l
«l
!>>-— CU
DM
IX •<
DHI
<* •(
ISL±
rt.l
0-3
?. r
O.oj
u*(*'-3-
uc
/'V
1.
0.0
ZE
0 (tf-i
-0-1
iL
o.O
i.s
o.o
-o.i
-o.a
1
IOu)
IX .IO..I
««'*'.
OUAnd
Dril
I* •<
o
O.L
I.I
{'I
M
0-^7
1LT.
0-3
-1.0
-/.•i
-1.0
3L.I
T/-0
u-c,
0-1
Tow ca
ibrulion gas is
used only lor turbine testing.
AJOO A^
ND°^
r\
-------
;l>
CEM Calibration Sheet
Client: Pt?S /€tA Citv: F/^^*^
Source: fl/~ 5+IQ//1/PO ASC Dale:
CEM Operator:
i (HI
r)
OU.uU. |bi«
~3tt
*r
r.-, ,3.0 I
cyo*.
KJ«I
Drill
».f *.•
(0*1
«— cu
Bi..
V— c«i
Dnt
«* W VI
Bk.
S^^
10*1
y«— oj
I>il
1* rf
J2.
JU_
0-3
Htl
TT
-cr
Al
/. 1
o.l
*|4 ) 0
0.0
xpsfp;?']
4V1
o.o
-a 3.
a.r
/.X
ilbMl
sy— .
B~
( K «r o
<* *
0-3
o-D
O.T
-o./
^14
-o.c;
-QA
low ca
ibralion gas is used only lor turbine testing.
C
-------
Client:
Source:
CEM Calibration Sheet
City:__E/^±i±_
Date:___£^2/l2_
O'
CEM Operator:
1 f
;/
P7*f7
10^
IS* .<%«.!
(X rf .-%..!
«)*(
sy— .
Drift
IX .IS>—
10X1
IX .f *».)
KJXI
»)«— CU1
Dri«
IX .(%..)
|
IX .1
4-.I
Kill
O-O
O-O
±±
-Q.fa
•tft
-0J&
rOjL
. 7
O.I
IX
dL*L
-/•o
Ml. 2-
HI*
-\M
low ca
ibraliuiLfias is
sed only lor turbine testing.
"'•
^ ^H
A
•
-------
CEM Calibrauon Sheet
Client: P£S /F^ City: A»*cf
Source: CL» Q /fl yt/Qo 4K- Dale:
CEM Operator:
~T.~p7:if
(v*,c>; -
(X
Drill
X.I3..
Kill
«JX»
*-— cu
Dri<
Cril
ix .r
Q.Ko.
I.T
J/.T
2*L
LJ3-
-0.1
0-1
-l.o
*mr
KJXI
Ori»
d^.
KJ»J
CiUntio*
Biu
^O
(0X1
[Ml
W^
(0X1
«-T!T!
.com
LO.
/•o
f.O
-O.H
-M
TO.^
o.x
-/.V
on
low cu iu ration gas is
sod
e.
A
t-
n
|
1
7
-------
Client:.
Source:
OEM Calibration Sheet
City:_
Dale:
- , /6
/
CEM Operator:.
t ~>
(.£)
~.
7*7
CJih^Oo,
Biu
(X «f *—>
(X .1 ^.
Orit
IX •!%..)
«JXI
r"— CU
Biu
IX rf
r«~ OJ
DHI
0-01
-o.oi
O.CXI
U-
&0-
i&L
.0-
-&-A.
Qj
-O.I
-O.I
-ao/
-at
-p.'
&2.
-o.o?
i*{~
-/.v
7)
?
(X .( O»l
IX •IOu|
(0X1
**_
CtUbrtUo
IX.ICh.)
KJX)
Dri»
«l4<
«x~ CJ
Bix
IX WCH.I
=Q4_
-O.I
0.0
^^L
ibratioi^gs is (used only lor lurbine lesling.
70 "**
-------
9*" L;^
O.l0° PCU<>- <
i V "•-
Ol-f
CEM Calibruuon Sheet
Client: P&*/Ef4 City: Fl~,*-<,
Source: &~+~ «t. /o A/Dd**L Dale:.
CEM Operator: /«/ /V
GUi
IT
Ctlibntic*
«» cu
Biu
(*
Drit
CX .1 ^..1
«,/6>
t>
,0 ^T/
1L1.
¥
O
o.a.
^/T.
0.*.
-O.I
. /
CditaMk.
KJSI .
(OX)
Dlift
* .l.^..
(OS)
-— CJ
BU.
Dril
W%
(0X1
K1X)
V— C
Urii
1* .(
1.**
-aj
low calibration gas is used only lor turbine testing
-------
TECHNICAL REPORT DATA
Please read instructions on the reverse before completing
1. REPORT NO.
EPA-454/R-99-024b
2.
4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE
Air Emissions From Reinforced Plastics Manufacturing Process, LASCO Panel
Products: Volume II /^ . .
Lcmpcjsrte.
Volume II of III
7. AUTHOR(S)
Franklin Meadows
Daniel F. Scheffel
9. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS
Pacific Environmental Services, Inc.
Post Office Box 12077
Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709-2077
12. SPONSORING AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards
Emissions, Monitoring and Analysis Division
Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 2771 1
3. RECIPIENT'S ACCESSION NO.
5. REPORT DATE
August 1999
6. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE
8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NO.
10. PROGRAM ELEMENT NO.
11. CONTRACT/GRANT NO.
68-D-70069
13. TYPE OF REPORT AND PERIOD COVERED
Final
14. SPONSORING AGENCY CODE
15. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES
16. ABSTRACT
The United States Environmental Protect
and Analysis Division (EMAD), Emission M
manufacturing source category to properly se
Amendments of 1990. The reinforced plastic
by the BSD as the host facility for this emissi
The sampling program was designed to
by reinforced plastic manufacturing, 2) Ident
area, 3) Evaluate three ventilation scenarios,
emission limitation achieved by the use of a i
emissions from a continuous lamination proc
options involving emissions abatement, and (
of raw material and the addition of a gel coat
Sampling was performed during 13 proc
and methyl methacrylate (MMA), and the ai
emissions of HAPs from the oven stacks.
This volume (Volume II) is comprised o
ion Agency (EPA) Emission Standards Division (ESD) requested that the EPA's Emissions Monitoring
easurement Center (EMC) provide testing support in the investigation of the reinforced plastics composite
t the Maximum Achievable Control Technology (MACT) standards as required by the Clean Air Act
s composite manufacturing process located at LASCO Panel Products in Florence, Kentucky was selected
ons testing program.
support the following ESD objectives: 1) Identify and quantify the hazardous air pollutants (HAPs) emitted
fy the sources of HAPs and the total HAPs mass emission rates from the wet application area and the oven
4) Depending on the effectiveness of the industry proposed "closed" system, develope a performance-based
.vet area enclosed table system, 5) Assess the existing emission factors for volatile organic compound
ess for the purposes of updating the information in AP-42 and determining cost effectiveness for MACT
5) Determine the effect of various process paramenters such as line speed, laminate thickness, HAP content
layer on the emission factor.
5SS operating conditions. Measurements were made of the total hydrocarbons (THC), styrene, cumene,
r flow rate at all enclosure exhausts. A secondary objective of the sampling program was to obtain the
'407 pages and consists of Appendix A.2 (Instrumental Methods Raw Field Data).
17. KEY WORDS AND DOCUMENT ANALYSIS
a. DESCRIPTIONS
Cumene
Emission Measurements
Hazardous Air Pollutants
Lamination Process
Methyl Methacrylate
Reinforced Plastics Manufacturing
Styrene
Total Hydrocarbons
Volatile Organic Compounds
18. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT
Unlimited
b. IDENTIFIERS/OPEN ENDED TERMS
19. SECURITY CLASS (This Report)
Unclassified
20. SECURITY CLASS (This page)
Unclassified
c. COASTI Field/Group
21. NO. OF PAGES
±&Q—Lfo~]
22. PRICE
EPA Form 2220-1 (Rev. 4-77) PREVIOUS EDITION IS OBSOLETE
F:\U\FMeadows\TRD.Frm\WP 6.1
------- |