EPA-460/3-76-013
October 1976
STUDY
OF EXHAUST EMISSIONS
FROM 1972 THROUGH 1975
MODEL YEAR
LIGHT-DUTY VEHICLES
IN DENVER
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Office of Air and Waste Management
Office of Mobile Source Air Pollution Control
Emission Control Technology Division
Ann Arbor, Michigan 48105
-------
EPA-460/3-76-013
STUDY
OF EXHAUST EMISSIONS
FROM 1972 THROUGH 1975
MODEL YEAR
LIGHT-DUTY VEHICLES
IN DENVER
Doiifila> I.. I-iIjcdalil anil Jerr\ I,. Terrs
\utomoli\r Toting Laboratories Inc.
I WOO Kasl Col fax
Aurora. Colorado 8001 I
Conlran No. 68-03-2183
EPA Project Officer: John C. Shollon
Prcpart-d for
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Of fire of Air and Vi asti- Management
Offirr of Mobile Source Air Pollution (xinlrol
F^mission Control Technology Division
Ann Arbor. Michigan 48105
October 1976
-------
This report is issued by the Environmental Protection Agency to report
technical data of interest to a limited number of readers. Copies are
available free of charge to Federal employees, current contractors and
grantees, and nonprofit organizations - in limited quantities - from the
Library Services Office (MD-35), Research Triangle Park, North Carolina
27711; or, for a fee, from the National Technical Information Service,
5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield, Virginia 22161.
This report was furnished to the Environmental Protection Agency by
Automotive Testing Laboratories, Inc. , Aurora, Colorado, in fulfillment
of Contract No.68-03-2183. The contents of this report are reproduced
herein as received from Automotive Testing Laboratories, Inc. The
opinions, findings, and conclusions.expressed are those of the author
and not necessarily those of the Environmental Protection Agency.
Mention of company or product names is not to be considered as an
endorsement by the Environmental Protection Agency.
Publication No. EPA-460/3-76-013
11
-------
ABSTRACT
Tests were performed on a sample of six-hundred and seventy-nine
(679) 1972 through 1976 model-year vehicles operating in the Denver
metropolitan area. Ten 1975 model light-duty trucks were included in
the sample. This vehicle sampling was used in connection with emission
factors development, short cycle evaluation and a task designed to
develop data on emission related costs and effectiveness of high altitude
vehicle maintenance specific to the Denver area.
The program was conducted in two phases. In the first phase, two
hundred and nine (209) vehicles, which are similar to vehicles tested
in other sites under this contract, were tested in the as-received
condition. These tests were performed in this and the other sites in
connection with emission factors development and short cycle evaluation.
The ten trucks were included in this sampling. With the exception of
the ten trucks and five of the passenger cars, these vehicles were
tested again after maintenance in connection with the Denver Inspection/
Maintenance Evaluation Task. This maintenance included the restoration
of emission control hardware which had been disabled and an emissions-
oriented tune-up. In the second phase, an additional four hundred and
seventy (470) vehicles were tested relative to the Denver Task. These
vehicles were initially subjected to an idle mode emissions screening
test, the standards for which were selected from Phase I data to fail
thirty-five percent of the highest emitting vehicles by this test. Those
vehicles which failed the inspection test were subsequently tested by the
more sophisticated laboratory procedures, maintained and retested by these
procedures. Maintenance of these vehicles was performed using the same
iii
-------
procedures applied in Phase I. Test procedures specific to emission
factors development included the Federal Test Procedure, the Surveillance
Driving Sequence and Steady State Procedures. Two additional variable
driving schedule mass emission tests were also conducted. One schedule
has an average speed lower than the Federal Test Procedure; the other a
higher average speed. Procedures specific to the short cycle evaluation
included the Clayton Key Mode, the Federal Short Cycle and the Federal
Three Mode Tests. The Denver Inspection/Maintenance Evaluation Task
included several of the above listed procedures and a hot start version
of the Federal Test Procedure (Hot Start FTP), the Two Speed Idle Test,
the Inspection Test and a test to evaluate catalytic converter efficiency,
in addition.
Fuel economy data were also obtained for vehicle operation connected
with the Federal Test Procedure, the Hot Start FTP, the High and Low
Speed driving cycle mass emission tests, the Highway Fuel economy Test
procedure and other of the mass emission tests.
iv
-------
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We acknowledge the professional assistance and guidance of
Mr. John Shelton, EPA's Project Officer and thank him particularly for
his responsiveness during critical phases of the program. We also
acknowledge and thank Messrs. John T. White III, Tom Bejma, Matthew
Macocha and other of the EPA staff members for their responsiveness and
guidance.
We acknowledge, also, the support and assistance provided by
Mr. Dale Wells, EPA Region VIII.
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. INTRODUCTION 1-1
2. TECHNICAL DISCUSSION 2-1
2.1 Program Objectives 2-1
2.2 Program Design 2-1
2.3 Test Vehicle Procurement 2-4
2.3.1 Test Vehicle Selection 2-4
2.3.1.1 Short Cycle Task Vehicle Selection 2-6
2.3.1.2 Denver Inspection/Maintenance
Evaluation Task Vehicle Selection 2-6
2.3.2 Incen tives 2-9
2.3.3 Test Vehicle Handling 2-9
2.4 Facilities and Equipment 2-14
2.4.1 Test Location 2-14
2.4.2 Constant Volume Sampler (CVS) 2-15
. 2.4.3 Emission Analysis Console 2-15
2.4.3.1 Data Acquisition System 2-16
2.4.4 Laboratory Standard Calibration Oases 2-17
2.4.5 Chassis Dynamometers 2-17
2.4.6 Denver Inspection/Maintenance Evaluation
Task Test, Diagnostic and Tune-up Equipment 2-17
2.4.7 Miscellaneous Equipment 2-19
2.5 Equipment Qualification, Calibration and Cross-
check 2-20
2.5.1 Constant Volume Sampler 2-20
2.5.2 Emission Analysis Console 2-21
2.5.3 Chassis Dynamometer 2-23
2.5.4 Denver Inspection/Maintenance Evaluation
Task Test, Diagnostic and Tune-up Equipment 2-23
2.5.5 Miscellaneous Equipment 2-24
2.6 Test Procedures 2-24
2.6.1 Vehicle Preparation 2-25
2.6.2 Equipment Preparation 2-26
2.6.3 Federal Exhaust Emission Test Procedure 2-27
2.6.3.1 Hot Start Federal Exhaust Emission
Test Procedure 2-27
2.6.4 Highway Fuel Economy Test Procedure 2-28
2.6.5 Modal Exhaust Emission Test Procedure 2-28
2.6.6 Clayton Key Mode Test Procedure 2-30
2.6.7 Low Speed Cycle Test Procedure 2-31
2.6.8 High Speed Cycle Test Procedure 2-31
2.6.9 Federal Short Cycle Test Procedure 2-32
2.6.10 Federal Three Mode Test Procedure 2-33
2.6.11 Converter Efficiency Test 2-34
2.6.12 Two Speed Idle Test 2-35
2.6.12.1 Inspection Test 2-35
2.6.13 Fuel Lead (Pb) Test 2-36
2.6.14 Denver Inspection/Maintenance Evaluation
Task Emission Related Maladjustment and
Disablement Inspection Procedures 2-36
vi
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONT.)
Page
2.6.15 Denver Inspection/Maintenance Evaluation
Task Diagnostic Procedures, Emission-
Oriented Tune-up and Documentation Thereof 2-37
2.6.16 Daily Test Schedule Procedures 2-40
2.7 Data Handling 2-40
2.7.1 Data Collection 2-40
2.7.2 Data Processing 2-41
2.7.3 Calculation of Results 2-41
2.7.3.1 Exhaust Emissions (Federal Test
Procedure) 2-42
2.7.3.2 Highway Fuel Economy 2-42
2.7.3.3 Modal Emissions 2-42
2.7.3.4 Clayton Key Mode Emissions 2-43
2.7.3.5 Low and High Speed Cycle Emissions 2-43
2.7.3.6 Federal Short Test and Federal
Three Mode Emissions 2-43
2.7.3.7 Converter Efficiency Test 2-43
2.7.3.8 Two Speed Idle Test (Inspection
Test) 2-43
2.7.3.9 Fuel Lead (Pb) Content Test 2-43
DISCUSSION OF TEST RESULTS 3-1
3.1 Federal Test Procedure Emissions and Fuel Economy 3-1
3.1.1 FTP Exhaust Emission Results vs. Model Year 3-1
3.1.2 Exhaust Emission Test Results for 1975
Model Light Trucks 3-3
3.1.3 Vehicles Meeting Federal Exhaust Emission
Standards 3-5
3.1.3.1 Vehicles Meeting Federal 1972,
1973/1974 and 1975 Exhaust Emission
Standards 3-5
3.1.3.2 Light Trucks Meeting Federal Exhaust
Emission Standards 3-10
3.1.3.3 1972 Vehicles Meeting Federal 1972
Exhaust Emission Standards 3-12
3.1.3.4 1973 Vehicles Meeting Federal 1973
Exhaust Emission Standards 3-14
3.1.3.5 1974 Vehicles Meeting Federal 1974
Exhaust Emission Standards 3-16
3.1.3.6 1975 Vehicles Meeting Federal 1975
Exhaust Emission Standards 3-18
3.2 Highway Fuel Economy and Emissions 3-20
3.3 Modal Emissions and Fuel Economy 3-22
3.4 Clayton Key Mode and Replicate Emissions 3-24
3.5 Low and High Speed Cycle Emissions and Fuel Economy 3-26
3.5.1 Low Speed Driving Cycle 3-26
3.5.2 High Speed Driving Cycle 3-27
3.6 Federal Short Cycle and Federal Three Mode Test
Emissions 3-29
vii
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONT.)
3.7 Denver Inspection/Maintenance Evaluation Task
Vehicle Test Results
3.7.1 Federal Test Procedure Results
3.7.1.1 Federal Test Procedure Results -
Air Pump/No Converter, Air Pump/
Converter, Converter/No Air Pump,
No Air Pump/No Converter - Before
and After Maintenance
3.7.2 Hot Start Federal Test Procedure Results
3.7.3 Federal Short Cycle Test Results
3.7.4 Two Speed Idle Test Results
3.7.5 Federal Three Mode Test Results and
Converter Efficiency Test Results
3.7.6 Maladjustment and Disablement Inspection
Results
3.7.7 Tune-up Information
3.7.8 Maintenance Costs
3.7.9 Vehicles Meeting Federal Exhaust Emission
Standards Before and After Maintenance
3.7.10 Vehicles Failing Idle Inspection Test
Hydrocarbon and Carbon Monoxide Standards
4. APPENDICES
Appendix A Listing of Vehicle and Test Parameters
3-33
3-33
Appendix B
Phase I
Phase II
Appendix C
Appendix D
Appendix E
Listing of Test Vehicle Use and
Maintenance Data
Listing of Test Vehicle Use and
Maintenance Data
Listing of Federal Test Procedure Results
on Individual Vehicles Before and After
Maintenance
Listing of Highway Fuel Economy and
Emission Results on Individual Vehicles
Listing of Modal Results on Individual
Vehicles
3-79
3-119
3-159
3-196
3-209
3-378
3-381
3-394
3-410
3-420
A-l
B-l
B-6
C-l
D-l
E-l
Appendix F
Appendix G
Listing of Clayton Key Mode and Replicate
Emission Results on Individual Vehicles
Listing of Low Speed Cycle Emissions and
Fuel Economy Results on Individual Vehicles
F-l
G-l
viii
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONT.)
Appendix H
Appendix I
Appendix J
Appendix K
Appendix L
Appendix M
Appendix N
Appendix 0
Listing of High Speed Cycle Emissions and
Fuel Economy Results on Individual Vehicles
Listing of Federal Test- rocedure,
Federal Short Test and Federal Three
Mode Test Emission Results on Individual
Vehicles
Denver Inspection/Maintenance Evaluation
Task Maladjustment and Disablement Inspection,
Diagnostic and Maintenance Procedures
Listing of 1972 Federal Hot Start Test
Procedure Results on Individual Vehicles
Before and After Maintenance
Listing of Federal Short Test Procedure
Results on Individual Vehicles Before and
After Maintenance
Listing of Two Speed Idle Test Procedure
Results on Individual Vehicles Before and
After Maintenance
Listing of Federal Three Mode Emission
Results on Individual Vehicles Before and
After Maintenance
Listing of As-Received Tank Fuel Lead (Pb)
Analysis on Individual Vehicles
H-l
1-1
J-l
K-l
L-l
M-l
N-l
0-1
ix
-------
List of Tables
Table No. Title Page
1 Summary of Vehicle Makes 2-6
2 Summary of Test Vehicle Characteristics by
Model Year 2-7
3 Exhaust Emission Results vs. Model Year 3-2
4 Exhaust Emission Results for 1975 Light-
Duty Trucks 3-4
5 Vehicles Meeting Federal Standards 3-7
6 1975 Light-Duty Trucks Meeting Federal
Standards 3-11
7 1972 Vehicles Meeting 1972 Federal Standards 3-13
8 1973 Vehicles Meeting 1973 Federal Standards 3-15
9 1974 Vehicles Meeting 1974 Federal Standards 3-17
10 1975 Vehicles Meeting 1975 Federal Standards 3-19
11 Highway Fuel Economy Test 3-21
12 Summary of Modal Emission Results on 1975
Model-Year Vehicles 3-23
13 Summary of Clayton Key Mode Measurements 3-25
14 Summary of Low Speed Cycle Measurements 3-28
15 Summary of High Speed Cycle Measurements 3-28
16 Summary of Federal Short Test, Federal
Three Mode Test, and Federal Test Procedure 3-30
17 Summary of 1975 Federal Test Procedure Results
on Phase I Passed Vehicles Before and After
Maintenance 3-37
18 Summary of 1972, Hot Start Test Procedure
Results on Phase I Passed Vehicles Before
and After Maintenance 3-123
19 Summary of Federal Short Test Procedure
Results on Phase I Passed Vehicles Before
and After Maintenance 3-160
-------
List of Tables (Cont.)
Table No. Title
20 Summary of Two Speed Idle Test Exhaust
Emission Results on Phase I Passed Vehicles
Before and After Maintenance 3-197
21 Summary of Federal Three Mode Test
Procedure Results on Phase I Passed Vehicles
Before and After Maintenance 3-210
22 Summary of Maladjustment/Disablement
Occurrences on Phase I Passed Vehicles 3-379
23 Summary of Tune Up Information on Phase I
Passed Vehicles 3-382
24 Summary of Maintenance Cost on Phase I
Passed Vehicles 3-398
25 Summary of Phase I Passed Vehicles Meeting
Federal Standards Before and After
Maintenance 3-414
xi
-------
xii
-------
1. INTRODUCTION
The U. S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), through authority
provided by the Clean Air Act, is responsible for the control and
prevention of air pollution. One of the charges of the EPA as provided
by the act is the design, conduct and promotion of surveys and studies
of the sources of air pollution. The Emission Control Technology
Division (ECTD) of the EPA develops, implements and administers a national
program to characterize, qualify and reduce the air pollution caused
by mobile sources. Included in the division's responsibilities are
obtaining emission data from in-use vehicles and developing and evaluating
vehicle emission control alternatives. These in-use vehicle data are
utilized within the EPA by the National Air Data Branch (NADB) and the
Office of Transportation Land Use Policy (OTLUP) for their use in calcu-
lating and projecting nationwide and metropolitan area motor vehicle
emissions from light-duty vehicles. The emission factors generated by
the NADB and OTLUP are used in developing transportation control procedures
and contingency programs to cover emergency situations. Outside the EPA,
these factors and the emission control alternatives are used by various
state and local agencies in their air pollution control programs. In
carrying out its responsibilities, the EPA regularly conducts in-use
vehicle emission factors programs and emission control alternative
studies.
The FY71 Program, EPA's first major emission factors program using
the constant volume sampler (CVS) technique, included exhaust and evap-
orative emission measurements from 1957-1971 light-duty vehicles.
Similar work on 1966-1972 model-year vehicles was completed in the
1-1
-------
FY72 study program. In the FY73 program, emissions from 1967-1974
light-duty vehicles were measured. The FY74 program, the subject of
this report, was initiated to study emissions from 1965-1975 model-
year vehicles.
In carrying out its FY74 program, the EPA contracted with Automotive
Testing Laboratories, Inc. (ATL) to provide emission data from vehicles
operating in four U. S. metropolitan areas. The four cities study is
part of a more comprehensive study effort to develop data from vehicles
operating in seven metropolitan areas. This report describes the conduct
of a part of ATL's contractual effort and presents the results of
testing in Denver. Test results from Chicago, Houston and Phoenix are in
a separate volume (Publication No. EPA-460/3-76-001) due to a modification
to the Denver segment. In addition to the data upon which emission
factors will be based, this report covers a study task specific to the
Denver area. This, the Denver Inspection/Maintenance Evaluation Task,
was included to provide the EPA with the data which could be utilized to
evaluate the costs and benefits of emission related maintenance on
vehicles operating in the high altitude environment of Denver, Colorado.
1-2
-------
2. TECHNICAL DISCUSSION
2.1 PROGRAM OBJECTIVES
The objective of the overall program was to provide light-duty
vehicle emission data. These data are used by the EPA to calculate
average emission factors from which emission source inventories and
emergency episode pollution abatement procedures are developed.
Other objectives included the development of short cycle emission
test data and data on the costs and effectiveness of high altitude vehicle
maintenance specific to the Denver site. The short cycle evaluation task
data are to be utilized by the EPA to establish correlations between
selected short cycle emission tests and the more sophisticated emission
testing procedures.
2.2 PROGRAM DESIGN
The original emission factors program contract specified a sample
size of one hundred and twenty-seven (127) vehicles of various makes from
the 1972-1975 model years. This sample included ten 1975 model-year
light-duty trucks. Two contract modifications were subsequently enacted
to increase the sample to a final size of six hundred and sixty-nine (669)
vehicles. The first modification added eighty-two (82) 1975 model-year
vehicles (for a total of 209) for the purpose of assessing the relation-
ship between various short cycle tests and the Federal Test Procedure.
The second modification provided for an additional four hundred and
seventy (470) vehicles for the purpose of assessing the benefits of
maintenance on Denver area vehicles. These and one hundred and ninety-
four (194) of,the two hundred and nine (209) vehicles were utilized in
the Denver Inspection/Maintenance (I/M) Evaluation Task. The ten light-duty
2-1
-------
trucks and five of the passenger cars were excluded In the Denver I/M
Evaluation Task. The tabular results presented in this report are
based on various subsatnples of the total sample of 679 vehicles. The
emission factor tables are based on the original sample of 127 vehicles.
The 82 vehicles added for short cycle test evaluation are not included
in emission factor data tabulations since these vehicles were selected
\
on a basis other than by sales weighted distributions. The Denver I/M
Evaluation Task tables are based on passed, failed or on all vehicles
in the 664 vehicle Denver I/M Evaluation Task sample. Listings of all
vehicle tests are provided in the appendices, however, so users can
compute and tabulate results based on requirements for different groups
of vehicles.
An approved sampling strategy was utilized to procure specific
vehicles. The EPA provided the listing. For emission factors development
and short cycle evaluation, this listing included a number of vehicles
which were common to all sites relative to the overall program. Certain
of these were also utilized in meeting specific objectives of the Denver
site. Vehicle procurement sources were also specified; however, certain
allowances for vehicle substitution were provided. An incentive package
to promote owner participation was also stipulated.
For emission factors development, standard mass emission measurement
procedures were employed. These included both bag sampling and modal
measurement procedures as stipulated by the EPA.
Procedures specific to emission factors development consisted of
the Federal Test Procedure (FTP) for light-duty vehicles and modal
emission measurements. The FTP was performed on all vehicles. Modal
tests included the Surveillance Driving Sequence and steady state (constant
2-2
-------
speed) procedures which were performed on thirty-five passenger cars
and ten light trucks at each site.
Several short cycle tests were conducted relative to the Short
Cycle Development Task. The Clayton Key Mode Test was performed on the
same forty-five 1975 model vehicles scheduled for modal emission measure-
ments. A replication of this test followed the first. One hundred 1975
model-year vehicles were subjected to the Federal Short Cycle. These
same vehicles were tested by the Federal Three Mode Test procedure.
The development of fuel economy data was included as one of the
study requirements. These data were calculated from FTP emission results
and from modal emission measurements during Surveillance Driving Sequence
and steady state operation. The Highway Fuel Economy Test was also
utilized to develop fuel economy data. This test was conducted on the
forty-five 1975 model vehicles tested by the Clayton Key Mode and modal
measurement procedures. The carbon balance fuel economy equation was
prescribed for both bag and modal fuel economy determinations.
Two additional variable driving cycle tests were also utilized to
develop emission data. The procedures are similar to those of the FTP.
One test has an average speed lower than the FTP cycle; the other a
higher average speed.
Procedures specific to the Denver Inspection/Maintenance Evaluation
Task involved the accumulation of before-and-after maintenance emission
and fuel economy data on all but fifteen of the two hundred and nine
Emission Factors/Short Cycle Evaluation Task sample vehicles. The
fifteen vehicles were tested only in the as-received state. Ten of these
fifteen vehicles were the light-duty trucks. The additional four hundred
and seventy vehicles used in this task were subjected to an inspection
2-3
-------
test prior to any other emission testing. Standards associated with this
test were selected to reject about thirty-five percent of these four
hundred and seventy vehicles. Before-and-after-maintenance emission and
fuel economy data were also developed on those vehicles which failed the
inspection. Maintenance associated with this task consisted of the
restoration of any items on which maladjustment or disablement had been
performed and an emissions-oriented tune-up.
Test procedures specific to the Denver Inspection/Maintenance
Evaluation Task were the Federal Test Procedure, a hot start version of
the Federal Test Procedure, the Federal Short Cycle, the Federal Three
Mode Test, the Clayton Key Mode Test, the Two Speed Idle Test and the
Inspection Test. A test to evaluate catalytic converter efficiency,
the Converter Efficiency Test, was also conducted. These procedures,
engine maintenance and restoration of maladjustment and disablement were
performed in a given evaluation test sequence.
2.3 TEST VEHICLE PROCUREMENT
2.3.1 Test Vehicle Selection
The EPA provided a listing of one hundred and twenty-seven emission
factors development vehicles to be tested in the site. Selection of
these vehicles was based on vehicle miles traveled (VMT) on a national
basis by age of vehicle (model year). The sample was further based on
national sales information within each model year. Selections of 1975
models were based on sales projections provided by the vehicle manufac-
turers. The sample was further delineated by make, engine size, model
(sub-compact, compact, intermediate, etc), transmission type and carbu-
retor type including a representation of fuel injected vehicles.
2-4
-------
Study specifications required the vehicles be procured from the
subject metropolitan area. The metropolitan area was defined as being
not more than ten miles outside the boundaries of the city. Other
stipulations included the following minimum requirements:
100% fit to the make and model year specified.
90% fit to the make, model year and engine displacement
specified.
70% exact match.
Also for any one model year, the use of rental vehicles was limited
to ten percent of those tested. The number of vehicles procured from
members of civic, fraternal and religious organizations was also limited
at fifty percent of the vehicles tested, and groups of test vehicles
from automotive-oriented organizations were prohibited.
In developing the test sample, an approved vehicle procurement
strategy was employed. Several postal zip-code areas were selected on
the basis of vehicle owner convenience and access to the testing site.
Owners residing within these areas were selected from computer files
by an nth name selection process. The service was provided by a firm
specializing in this kind of activity. Nth name selection was followed
by a mailing of introductory materials which included an explanatory
letter from both the EPA and ATL to the prospective test vehicle owners.
The materials also included a post-paid data reply card on which
certain vehicle identification information was requested. This infor-
mation was subsequently used to select test vehicles in accordance with
the EPA-provided listing and to schedule the vehicles for testing.
Our experience in prior studies of this nature provided the basis
for determining the required number of mailings. While affirmative
2-5
-------
responses to requests for vehicles vary from site to site, we have
found they number from three to ten percent of the initial mailing.
Consequently, we utilized about thirty mailings for each vehicle to be
tested. This strategy produced about eighty-five to ninety percent of
the desired sample. The remaining vehicles were procured by direct
request via the news media, automobile repair organization service files,
used car lots and other sources.
Composition of the one hundred and twenty-seven emission factors
sample tested in the site is shown by model year and make in Table 1 and
by model year, inertia weight (shipping weight plus 300 Ibs.), engine
displacement and number of engine cylinders in Table 2.
2.3.1.1 Short Cycle Task Vehicle Selection - One hundred 1975 model-year
vehicles were utilized for the Short Cycle Evaluation Task. Eighteen of
the vehicles used for emission factors development were also used to
develop data for this evaluation. Short cycle evaluation vehicle fit
requirements, however, were somewhat more stringent as follows:
100% fit to the required make.
90% fit to the required make, model, engine displacement
and transmission type.
2.3.1.2 Denver Inspection/Maintenance Evaluation Task Vehicle Selection -
Six hundred and sixty-four passenger cars were tested under this task.
One hundred and ninety-four vehicles were tested for emission factors/
short cycle evaluation. The balance, four hundred and seventy, were
vehicles procured specifically for evaluation task purposes. These vehicles
were selected on the same basis (national VMT and sales information) as
those used for emission factors development. Fit specifications for
these vehicles were identical to the requirements for emission factors
2-6
-------
TABLE 1
SUMMARY OF VEHICLE MAKES
DENVER
1967 1968 1969 1970 1971 1972 1973 1974 1975 TOTAL
LIGHT-DUTY TRUCKS
CHEVROLET
DODGE
FORD
CMC
DOMESTICS
AMC
BUICK
CADILLAC
CHEVROLET
CHRYSLER
DODGE
FORD
LINCOLN
MERCURY
OLDSMOBILE
PLYMOUTH
PONTIAC
IMPORTS
AUDI
BMW
CAPRI
COLT
DATS UN
FIAT
HONDA
MAZDA
MERC.-BENZ
MG
OPEL
PORSCHE
SAAB
SUBARU
TOYOTA
VW
VOLVO
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
1
6
0
1
5
0
1
1
2
2
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
2
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
1
6
0
1
5
0
1
2
2
2
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
2
0
0
0
0
0
1
2
0
6
0
2
5
1
1
3
2
2
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
2
0
4
1
4
1
1
3
1
6
1
2
5
0
2
3
2
3
0
0
1
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
2
0
4
1
4
1
4
7
3
24
1
6
20
1
5
9
8
9
0
0
1
0
4
0
1
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
4
8
0
TOTALS
0
0
0
0
0
25
27
30
45 127
2-7
-------
TABLE 2
SUMMARY OF TEST VEHICLE CHARACTERISTICS
BY MODEL YEAR
DENVER
1975
1967 1968 1969 1970 1971 1972 1973 1974 1975 (TRUCKS) TOTAL
INERTIA WEIGHTS (LBS)
1750
2000
2250
2500 '
2750
3000
3500
4000
4500
5000
5500
UNDER 251
251-330
331-399
OVER 399
0
0
0
0
.0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
ENGINE
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
3
1
2
7
2
6
1
0
DISPLACEMENT
0
0
0
0 -
NUMBER OF
4
6
8
ROTARY
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
8
3
8
6
ENGINE
6
3
16
0
0
0
2
3
1
5
1
5
8
1
1
(CUBIC
10
2
8
7
0
0
2
1
4
1
5
8
4
3
2
0
1
2
1
3
1
5
7
8
5
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
10
0
0
0
0
1
9
8
9
9
18
32
26
10
5
INCHES)
11
5
7
7
12
3
11
9
0
3
7
0
41
16
41
29
CYLINDERS
7
3
17
0
6
4
19
1
8
5
22
0
0
0
10
0
27
15
84
1
TOTALS
0
0
0
0
25
27
30
35
10
127
2-8
-------
vehicles except as affected by the more stringent specifications required
for the short cycle evaluation test sample.
2.3.2 Incentives
The EPA prescribed incentives to be offered and provided to owners
whose vehicles were utilized in the test program. The incentive package
consisted of: a $50 U. S. Savings Bond; the use of a late-model loan
car during the time the test vehicle was at the laboratory; fuel for
the loan car; and a full tank of fuel for the test vehicle when testing
was completed. The owner of a vehicle selected for the maintenance
evaluation task and whose vehicle passed the inspection test, however,
was provided a $25 U. S. Savings Bond instead of the above. These
incentives were generally offered and provided. In a few cases involving
specific vehicles which were otherwise difficult to locate, however, an
equivalent or greater amount of cash or some other form of compensation
was provided.
2.3.3 Test Vehicle Handling
Testing was completed on the six hundred and seventy-nine vehicles
in two phases. In Phase I, tests on the two hundred and nine Emission
Factors Development/Short Cycle Evaluation Task vehicles, one hundred
and ninety-four of which were used also in the Denver Inspection/
Maintenance Evaluation Task, were completed. Tests on the four hundred
and seventy vehicles used exclusively in the Denver Inspection/Maintenance
Evaluation Task were completed in Phase II. Test results from Phase I
were used to establish the pass/fail criteria for the inspection test
applied in Phase II.
The handling process relative to the two hundred and nine Emission
2-9
-------
Factors/Short Cycle/Denver Inspection/Maintenance Evaluation Task vehicles
is shown in the flow diagram provided in Figure 1.
Upon delivery of the Phase I test vehicle to the laboratory, the
vehicle was immediately inspected to determine its compliance with
sample requirements. In a few cases, vehicles were rejected at this
point because of incorrect engine, carburetor or other parameter identi-
fication by the owners. In a few other situations, vehicles were rejected
for exhaust system leakage, safety or for some other reason which made
the vehicle unfit for testing. After the preliminary inspection
indicated the vehicle to be acceptable, vehicle exchange agreements were
completed, an EPA designed questionnaire on vehicle useage and maintenance
frequency and intensity was administered and a test vehicle pick-up time
was established with the owner. The vehicle was then moved to a staging
area where pre-test operations were performed.
Following pre-test operations, which included the installation of
converter efficiency test probes on converter equipped vehicles, an
analysis for as-received fuel lead (Pb) content, and the required Federal
Test Procedure vehicle temperature stabilization (soak) time period, the
first or before-maintenance evaluation test sequence was conducted.
Following this test sequence, the as-received status of engine parameters
was documented, engine diagnostic operations were conducted and an
extensive disablement inspection was performed on all vehicles tested in
Phase I except the ten trucks and five 1975 model-year passenger cars.
On these, the remaining one hundred and ninety-four vehicles, any items
found to have been subjected to disablement were then restored, periodic
maintenance in accordance with EPA provided guidelines was completed and
an emissions-oriented tune-up was applied. Again, following the prescribed
2-10
-------
Preliminary Compliance/
Safety/Exhaust System
Inspection
209
Accepted
Vehicles
Rejected
Vehicle
As Received
Fuel Lead (Pb) Analysis
& Pre-test Operations
Evaluation Test
Sequence #1
Ten Trucks and
Five 1975/76
Model-Year
Passenger Cars
Documentation of
Engine Status,
Diagnostics and
Disablement Inspection
After-
test
Procedures
Return Vehicle
to Owner
Disablement Restoration,
Required Periodic
Maintenance and
Emissions-Oriented
Tune-Up
Evaluation Test
Sequence #2
After-Test
Procedures
Figure 1, Phase I, Flow Diagram of Emission Factors
Development/Short Cycle Evaluation/Denver
Inspection/Maintenance Evaluation Task
Vehicles.
2-11
-------
soak interval, a second or after maintenance evaluation test sequence was
performed on the one hundred and ninety-four vehicles. After this second
evaluation test sequence on these vehicles and the as-received evaluation
test sequence on the ten trucks and five cars, after-test procedures were
completed and each vehicle tank was filled with a suitable commercial
fuel. The vehicle was then moved to a parking area where it remained
until picked-up by the owner. When the owner arrived, after-test
agreements were completed and the vehicle was returned to the owner's
custody.
The handling process relative to the four hundred and seventy
vehicles tested in Phase II is shown in the flow diagram provided in
Figure 2.
Upon delivery of the Phase II vehicle to the laboratory, it was
also immediately inspected to determine compliance with sample requirements,
A few of these vehicles were also rejected at this point because of
incorrect engine, carburetor or other parameter identification by the
owners. Some were also rejected for exhaust system leakage, safety or
for some other factor which rendered them unfit for testing. After
this preliminary inspection indicated the vehicle to be acceptable, the
emission screening or Inspection Test was conducted. As mentioned earlier,
Phase I test data were used in screening the Phase II vehicles. Concurrent
with the Inspection Test, the EPA designed questionnaire on vehicle useage
and maintenance frequency and intensity was administered to the owner.
The as-received status of the engine was documented relative to those
vehicles which passed the inspection. As-received fuel from these
vehicles, also, was analyzed for lead (Pb) content at this point. Passed
2-12
-------
Preliminary Compliance/
Safety/Exhaust System
Inspection
470
Accepted
Vehicles
Rejected
Vehicle
Inspection
Test
Passed Vehicles
65 Percent
Failed Vehicles
35 Percent
As Rec'd Fuel Lead
(Pb) Analysis
Pre-Test Operations
Evaluation Test
Sequence #1
Documentation of
Engine Status
& As Rec'd Fuel
Lead Analysis
Documentation of
Engine Status,
Diagnostics and
Disablement Inspection
Return Vehicle
to Owner
Disablement Restoration
Required Periodic
Maintenance and
Emissions-Oriented
Tune-up
Evaluation Test
Sequence #2
After-Test
Procedures
Figure 2, Phase II, Flow Diagram of Additional 470
Vehicles Used Exclusively in the Denver
Inspection/Maintenance Evaluation Task.
2-13
-------
vehicles were then immediately returned to their owners while vehicle
exchange agreements were completed relative to those vehicles which failed
the inspection test. A test vehicle pick-up time was scheduled with the
owner relative to those vehicles which failed the inspection. The failed
vehicle was then moved to the staging area where a fuel sample was drawn
for as-received lead (Pb) content analysis and the converter efficiency
test probes were installed. Other of the pre-test operations were then
performed.
Following these operations and the prescribed temperature soak
period, the first evaluation test sequence was conducted. As-received
status of engine parameters were then documented, engine diagnostics
were performed and an inspection for disablement was conducted. Any items
found to have been subjected to disablement were restored, periodic
maintenance in accordance with the EPA provided guidelines was completed
and the emissions oriented tune-up was applied. The second evaluation
test sequence was then performed on these repaired vehicles. Following
this sequence, the after-test procedures were performed and the vehicle
was moved to the parking area where it remained until picked-up by its
owner. When the owner arrived, after-test agreements were completed and
the vehicle was returned to the custody of its owner.
2.4 FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT
2.4.1 Test Location
Our permanent Denver area laboratory facilities were used in the
conduct of the study* The location and elevation above sea-level of
this facility is:
19900 East Colfax Avenue
Aurora, Colorado 80011
5,490 feet above msl
2-14
-------
These facilities, situated about twenty miles east of downtown Denver,
contain 18,200 square feet of office and laboratory areas. Temperature
in the subject vehicle storage (soak) and testing areas is controlled
by unit gas heaters and evaporative coolers.
2.4.2 Constant Volume Sampler (CVS)
One set of test equipment was utilized in the course of the Denver
phases of the study.
The constant volume sampler that was utilized was designed and
constructed by Automotive Environmental Systems, Inc. (AESI) of
Westminister, California. It is nominally air flow rated at 325 cubic
feet per minute and is equipped with a gas to water heat exchanger. The
CVS is of six bag (3 sample and 3 background) design. Its plumbing and
electrical flow systems were modified from AESl's conventional Model 1000
design to facilitate semi-automated sample bag purging and evacuating
functions. It was also modified to incorporate an automated sampling
system leak-check feature. The unit meets the current 40 CFR 86
requirements for constant volume samplers.
2.4.3 Emission Analysis Console
The emission analysis console used in the conduct of the study is
of ATL design and construction. It was assembled to meet the specific
requirements of the study and is equipped with a variety of instrumen-
tation. Major console components are:
Bendix Model 8501/5C NDIR CO Analyzer, Operational ranges;
0-0.3% 2" cell
0-3% 3/4" cell
0-5% 3/4" cell
Bendix Model 8501 NDIR CO Analyzer, Operational ranges;
0-100 ppm 11 1/4" cell
0-500 ppm 11 1/4" cell
2-15
-------
Beckman Model 864 NDIR C02 Analyzer, Operational ranges;
0-4Z 1/8" cell
0-83 1/8" cell
Beckman Model 400 FID HC Analyzer, Operational ranges;
0-50 ppm C
0-100 ppm C
0-300 ppm C
Beckman Model 400 FID HC Analyzer, Operational ranges;
0-1,000 ppm C
0-3,000 ppm C
0-10,000 ppm C
Thermo-Electron Model 10A CL NO-NOX Analyzer, Operational
ranges;
0-100 ppm
0-250 ppm
0-1,000 ppm
0-2,500 ppm
All plumbing in the sampling and calibration system of the
analytical console, including the sample, calibration and zero gas lines,
the CVS and all valves and fittings are of stainless steel or teflon
construction. Leak tight convoluted stainless steel tubing was used
between the CVS and vehicle tailpipe. Accuflex adapters were used to
connect the convoluted tubing to the tailpipe.
Operation of the analytical console was such that sample readings
were generally obtained in the upper two-thirds of the respective
instrument range. Also, span gases were utilized in conjunction with
each sample reading. Span gases were provided at nominally 80 percent
of full scale for each operating range.
2.4.3.1 Data Acquisition System - A data acquisition system (DAS) was
utilized in conjunction with the analytical console and other test
equipment. The DAS is comprised of a Data General NOVA-2 computer, a
2-16
-------
Teletype, Model ASR33 and an eight channel Brush Instruments strip
chart recorder. DAS software, which was developed by ATL, provides
for computer integration of analyzer outputs on both a bag and modal
basis. These integrated readings are displayed by the ASR33 teletype.
Permanent strip chart recordings of these readings are obtained and
recorded by the Brush recorder.
2.4.4 Laboratory Standard Calibration Gases
A full complement of laboratory standard calibration gases was
provided and utilized to establish analytical instrument calibrations.
These gases, listed on the following page, are traceable to standards
of the EPA laboratory in Ann Arbor.
2.4.5 Chassis Dynamometers
A Clayton Model ECE-50 chassis dynamometer was used in the program
in conjunction with a Clayton 1,750 to 5,500 Ib. direct drive vehicle
inertia flywheel assembly. The ECE-50 model includes two 78" continuous
drive wheel rolls with 17.25" spacing, a 50 hp water brake absorption
unit and the corresponding solid state torque bridge and power display
meter. The dynamometer and flywheel assembly are mounted flush with the
floor.
2.4.6 Denver Inspection/Maintenance Evaluation Task Test, Diagnostic
and Tune-up Equipment
In addition to equipment described above, two Sun Electric Corp.
Model EPA 75 HC/CO analyzers were utilized in the Denver Inspection/
Maintenance Task. One was located in the dynamometer area; the other
in the vehicle diagnostic and maintenance area. The latter was used
to perform the Inspection Test and in the diagnostic and maintenance
operations. Each of these units was installed in a cart and each was
equipped such as to facilitate gas calibration.
2-17
-------
HC (ppm C)
26.1
28.0
46.4
49.6
91.9
94.2
NOX (ppm)
44.7
97.2
CO (mole %)
.501
.511
.780
.830
1.29
CO (ppm)
10.6
11.8
22.9
26.5
36.4
49.9
50.2
C02 (mole %)
Propane in Zero Grade Air
144.5 939 2904
147.5 948 4630
277.1 1398 4961
293.1 1422 8573
472 2759 8710
478
Diluent-Zero Grade Nitrogen
133.2 523 1349
247.5 988 2190
Diluent-Zero Grade Nitrogen
1.99 3.78 7.03
2.01 3.84 7.28
2.74 4.78 9.02
2.75 4.80 9.06
Diluent-Zero Grade Nitrogen
65.6 250.6 1297
70.1 344.8 1328
90.8 353.2 1992
93.5 489.0 2132
160.2 490.0 2525
167.5 943.7 2746
243.2 1098
Diluent-Zero Grade Nitrogen
.403 1.41 2.81 5.61
.99 1.99 3.60 7.22
Allowable impurities, less than 1 ppm C, 1 ppm CO,
400 ppm C02 and 0.1 ppm NO.
A test was devised to provide an indication of converter efficiency
on those vehicles so equipped. This test, the Converter Efficiency
Test, was performed in conjunction with the Federal Three Mode Teat. A
Sectarian Model OM-11 was employed to measure exhaust oxygen during these
tests.
A Sun Model TUT-915-R Tune-up Tester, which was located in the
same cart utilized to contain the Sun EPA 75 EC/CO analyzer, was used
in the diagnosis and maintenance process. This unit contains an ignition
2-18
-------
oscilloscope with the ignition spark blank-out feature, a timing light
and a tachometer-dwellraeter. Other diagnostic and maintenance equipment
included a cylinder compression gauge, a cylinder leakage tester,
vacuum and pressure gauges and various other equipment and hand tools
associated with the tune-up process.
2.4.7 Miscellaneous Equipment
For the Clayton Key Mode and Federal Three Mode emission tests, the
Sun Model EPA 75 located in the dynamometer area was used for hydrocarbon
and carbon monoxide measurement. The Sun EPA 75, used to perform the
Inspection Test and in engine diagnosis and maintenance, was used also for
HC and CO measurements in conjunction with the after-test procedures. A
Thermo-Electron Model 10B CL was used for oxides of nitrogen measurement
for these same tests. This instrument was operated in the NO measurement
mode.
To assist the vehicle operator in following the speed/time profiles
required for the various driving schedules, an Esterline Angus Model
L1102S strip chart recorder was employed. The Model L1102S is a dual
channel, dual pen crossover, heat stylus recorder. The required
driving schedule is supplied the leading stylus by the NOVA computer.
The lagging pen is electronically coupled to the dynamometer roll speed
signal generator. The latter provides a permanent record of actual
driver/vehicle performance during the various tests. The time offset
between the two pens is nominally 40 seconds.
A Hartzell Model N24DW fixed speed cooling fan was used to provide
underhood cooling to the vehicle during prescribed tests. The fan is
a propeller type and is rated at 5,245 cfm at 1140 rpm.
To monitor the soak area, wet/dry bulb and CVS sample temperatures,
2-19
-------
several Rustrak Model 288 strip chart recorders were utilized. These
recorders have an accuracy of + 2% of full scale and were supplied with
ranges of 50° to 100°F and 100° to 150°F to meet the specific monitoring
requirements.
A ratcheting-type cable winch was employed to restrain the vehicle
during dynamometer testing operations. Wedge-type wheel chocks were
also used.
Diagnosis and tune-up equipment described above were used to measure
engine parameters during the after-test procedures.
Additional equipment was utilized for laboratory instrumentation
calibration and qualification procedures. This equipment is described
in paragraphs which follow.
2.5 EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION, CALIBRATION AND CROSS-CHECK
To ensure valid test data, the EPA required all test equipment,
calibration procedures and operating procedures be qualified to its
satisfaction prior to test start-up. In addition, extensive quality
control procedures were required initially and at regular intervals
throughout the program.
2.5.1 Constant Volume Sampler
The constant volume sampler was given a complete check-out and
flow calibration prior to start-up. A Meriam Model 50MC2-6F laminar
flow element with a rating of 1,000 cfm at 8" H20 was utilized for the
calibration. Calibration of the element is traceable to the National
Bureau of Standards.
In performing the calibration, CVS air flow, measured at the inlet
to the blower, was controlled by throttling. Blower flow rates were
measured at ten incremental changes in blower differential pressure
2-20
-------
across the normal operating range. Auxiliary devices employed in the
calibration included a mercury barometer to measure absolute barometric
pressure, a close tolerance mercury filled thermometer to measure CVS
inlet air temperature, a U-tube water manometer to measure the pressure
drop across the blower and blower inlet pressure and an inclined water
manometer to measure pressure drop across the laminar flow element.
Data from these devices were computer processed, mid-range CVS operating
pressures were determined and the corresponding absolute blower flow
rate was selected. Once these operations were completed, the flow cali-
bration was verified by propane recovery.
Subsequently, integrity of the flow calibration and sample system
was checked on a daily basis by the propane recovery technique. Up to
20 grams of instrument grade propane were metered into the sampler
such that the injected amount yielded a recovery concentration in the
upper one-third of the 0-300 ppm C FID range. Recovery was specified
to be within + 2 percent of the metered amount. Metering was performed
by the bomb weight loss technique. A triple beam balance, accurate to
20 milligrams, was utilized for this purpose.
2.5.2 Emission Analysis Console
Complete analytical instrumentation calibrations were performed
initially and on a weekly basis. Calibration curves for the emission
analysis console CO, C02, HC and NOX instruments were established using
the EPA named gases listed in paragraph 2.A.A. The CO and O>2
instruments were calibrated at seven somewhat evenly spaced points (zero
and six upscale points) across each operating range. The HC and NOX
instruments were calibrated at three somewhat evenly spaced points
2-21
-------
(zero and two upscale points) across each operating range. Calibration
of these instruments was required to be maintained within one percent of
full scale for each range, respectively, or five percent of the measured
value, whichever was smaller. The computer program used in the generation
of these curves was supplied by the EPA.
A leak check of the analytical system was performed prior to each
test in connection with the required bag purging and evacuating procedures.
For contract purposes, a test was defined as constituting the accumu-
lation of one sample bag. Nitrogen was used to purge the bags. The
evacuate, N2 purge, evacuate and leak check sequence was accomplished
by means of a rotary switch. Switch actuation is provided by various
pressure and time signals which indicate satisfactory completion of the
operation in question. A leak in the system is signaled by a pressure
drop across a small orifice which indicates flow. The orifice is
monitored by a differential pressure transducer which actuates both an
audible and visible alarm in the presence of flow. The sensitivity of
these devices was checked daily in connection with other of the quality
control activities.
Other of the activities included zero and span point sets immedi-
ately prior to the analysis and zero and span point verification
immediately following the analysis. Verification tolerances were main-
tained within + 1 percent of full scale of the range in use. The
tolerance for modal data was + 2 percent of full scale. Converter
efficiency of the NOx analyzer was checked daily. Efficiency was
maintained above 90 percent. The noise level of analyzer outputs was
maintained within +0.5 percent of full scale for each range during
both calibration and analysis.
2-22
-------
2.5.3 Chassis Dynamometer
The chassis dynamometer was calibrated initially and after maintenance
which could have affected its operating characteristics. It was also
subjected to a complete calibration verification at an interval of 30
days or less.
Power and speed meters were firstly calibrated using the strobe
light dead-weight calibration kit supplied by the dynamometer manufacturer.
Subsequent to this, a dynamic calibration using the coast-down technique
of the Federal Register was performed. This technique was applied at
each incremental flywheel inertia weight using the following two
indicated horsepower (IHP) settings:
- HPQ - 2.5 + 0.5
HP2 - HPQ + 2.5 + 0.5
where HPQ is the IHP determined from a previous coast down.
This procedure essentially brackets the IHP associated with a given
inertia weight or weights from a prior coastdown calibration thereby
reducing the requirement for lengthy multiple point calibration.
2.5.4 Denver Inspection/Maintenance Evaluation Task Test f Diagnostic
and Tune-up Equipment
Each of the Sun EPA 75 HC/CO analyzers used in the dynamometer
area and in the engine diagnosis and maintenance area was gas calibrated
initially using zero gas and one upscale gas for each of the two HC and
CO ranges. Thereafter, each instrument was zeroed on air and spanned
using an upscale gas for each range before each test. In this case, a
test constituted the whole of the Clayton Key Mode Test, the whole of
the Federal Three Mode Test, etc., for the respective instrument. The
instrument used for the Inspection Test, engine diagnosis and maintenance
and after- test procedures was zeroed on air and gas spanned (each range)
2-23
-------
prior to utilization in each of these tasks or sequence of operations.
The Beckman OM-11 was calibrated initially using a zero gas (N2>
and two upscale 02 gas standards. During testing, the instrument was
zeroed on N2 and spanned at the appropriate point using the 02 content
in ambient air. These calibrations were performed prior to each test.
The Sun Model TUT-915-R Tune-up Tester was calibrated by the manu-
facturer prior to utilization in the program as was other of the
diagnostic and tune-up equipment which is subject to calibration.
2.5.5 •Miscellaneous Equipment
The NOx instrument used for undiluted tailpipe measurement was
calibrated initially using the laboratory standard gases. Zero point
and two upscale gases were used to establish curves on each of the
operating ranges. A verification of this calibration was conducted
each one to two weeks thereafter. During testing, the NOX instrument
was zero and span checked immediately before and after each test run.
The Clayton Key Mode and the Federal Three Mode tests required
horsepower settings exceeding those of the Federal Register for light-
duty vehicle testing. Consequently, coastdown calibrations which
bracketed the prescribed settings were required and performed.
2.6 TEST PROCEDURES
A variety of test procedures was employed depending on the task (s)
to which the vehicle was assigned. The Evaluation Test Sequence was as
follows:
1975 Federal Test Procedure
Highway Fuel Economy Test (if required)
Hot Start Federal Test Procedure
Modal Measurements (if required)
2-24
-------
Federal Short Cycle
Two Speed Idle Test
Federal Short Cycle (replicate)
Federal Three Mode Test
Two Speed Idle Test (replicate)
Federal Three Mode Test (replicate)
Key Mode Cycle (if required)
Key Mode Cycle (replicate)
Low Speed Driving Cycle (if required)
High Speed Driving Cycle (if required)
After-test procedures were performed on all vehicles after the first
Evaluation Test Sequence. The Inspection Test, which consists of the
same elements and employs the same procedural steps as the Two Speed
Idle, was performed in conjunction with the initial vehicle acceptance
process relative to the Phase II vehicles.
2.6.1 Vehicle Preparation
Upon acceptance for testing of all Phase I and those Phase II
vehicles which failed the inspection test, the vehicle was moved to a
staging area where the tank was drained of existing fuel and refueled to
forty percent of tank capacity. As indicated earlier, a sample of fuel
from the Phase I vehicle was collected for lead (Pb) analysis during
the draining process. As also indicated, a tank fuel sample from the
Phase II vehicle was obtained as part of the vehicle inspection and
acceptance process. The vehicles were refueled with the Indolene-type
fuels. Fuel was drawn from the tank into a 200 gallon reservoir.
During the draining process the reservoir was maintained under negative
2-25
-------
pressure by means of a high capacity vacuum pump. Following these fuel
handling processes, any installed mud and snow tires were rotated to
non-drive wheel positions and drive tires were inflated to the pressure
prescribed for proper dynamometer operation.
Some time following the refueling and tire handling process, the
vehicle was operated for a nominal period of ten minutes on city streets
to evaluate its driving characteristics and to purge the remaining non-
test fuel. The finding of any unusual driving characteristics was
documented for the benefit of the test driver during dynamometer testing.
Upon completion of this driving operation, the vehicle was driven into the
laboratory to begin the pre-test soak interval. These preconditioning
and evaluation operations were closely regulated so as to allow maintenance
of the EPA prescribed soak interval at twelve to twenty hours. Engine
shut-down time in connection with preconditioning and the start of the
soak interval was documented. If, for any reason the soak interval was
exceeded, the vehicle was again preconditioned for a period of ten minutes,
returned to the soak area and shut-down.
2.6.2 Equipment Preparation
Prior to the first test of the day, instruments which had been
idle or in a stand-by condition were switched on to begin the warm-up.
This included the water heater and mass pump of the CVS and the analytical
instruments. During and following the warm-up period, sensitivity of
the automatic leak detection system was checked, converter efficiency
and propane recovery tests were performed, analyzer outputs as indicated
by the recorders and the computer were checked for standardization and
the dynamometer was warmed-up in the manner prescribed. The speed
calibration of the dynamometer and associated Indicating devices were
2-26
-------
also standardized and the tailpipe sampling system was checked for
leaks. During this interval, the soak area temperature trace and the
computer punch tape and print-out from the previous day were collected
for evaluation and processing.
2.6.3 Federal Exhaust Emission Test Procedure
The basic or standard exhaust emission test, which was conducted at
each test point on each of the Phase I and each of the Phase II vehicles
that failed the Inspection Test, was performed in general accordance with
the procedures of 38 Federal Register 124, 38 Federal Register 209,
39 Federal Register 14 and 39 Federal Register 101 (the Federal Test
Procedure). Procedures dealing with fuel evaporative loss measurements
were not performed. Tests were preceded by a soak interval from
twelve to twenty hours at temperatures ranging from 60°F to 86°F (15.6°C
to 30°C). The temperature during the first and last hour of this soak
interval was maintained between 68°F and 86°F.
The Federal Test Procedure is comprised of cold transient, cold
stabilized and hot transient test portions. The cold transient portion
is 505 seconds long, covers a distance of 3.59 miles and has an average
speed of 25.6 mph. The cold stabilized portion is 867 seconds in
length, 3.91 miles in distance and 16.2 mph in average speed. The hot
transient portion is 505 seconds long, 3.59 miles in distance and 25.6
mph in average speed.
2.6.3.1 Hot Start Federal Exhaust Emission Test Procedure - The Hot
Start Federal Exhaust Emission Test Procedure (Hot Start FTP), which was
also performed at each test point on each of the above noted vehicles,
was performed in general accordance with these same procedures. Exhaust
sampling was initiated, however, from a hot engine start.
2-27
-------
The Hot Start FTP is comprised of transient and stabilized test
portions. These portions are identical to the transient and stabilized
portions of the Federal Test Procedure (FTP).
2.6.A Highway Fuel Economy Test Procedure
The Highway Fuel Economy Test (HFET) was performed as part of the
first Evaluation Test Sequence, only, on forty-five of the 1975 model-
year vehicles (35 passenger cars and 10 light trucks). This test involves
vehicle operation on the dynamometer over a 10.2 mile driving schedule of
765 seconds duration. The test was started with the vehicle in a warmed-up
condition. This condition was defined as at least 7.5 miles of cyclic
operation having occurred within the preceding thirty-five minute period.
The vehicle was operated at 50 miles per hour for a period of three
minutes. Within one minute of the end of this cruise period, the vehicle
was brought to an idle condition and the test was started. A CVS sample
bag was used to collect dilute exhaust for the purpose of emission and
fuel economy calculations. Load settings, inertia weights and the speed
and underhood cooling fan temperature tolerances of the HFET are identical
to those of the Federal Test Procedure.
2.6.5 Modal Exhaust Emission Test Procedure
Modal Emission Measurements were made on the same 1975 model
passenger cars and light trucks subjected to the HFET, also, only during
the first Evaluation Test Sequence.
Modal Emission Measurements are comprised of two separate tests;
steady states and the Surveillance Driving Sequence. Each test was
preceded by a soak period no longer than twenty minutes from the last
sustained period of vehicle operation. At the end of the soak, the
vehicle was operated on the dynamometer for a period of three minutes
2-28
-------
at 50 miles per hour. During this time, dynamometer speed and power
settings were checked and adjusted as necessary. Within one minute
after the end of the 50 mph cruise, the vehicle was brought to idle and
the test was begun.
Steady state emissions were collected using the CVS bag technique.
Measurements were taken at each speed successively from idle through
5, 10, 15, 30, 45 and 60 miles per hour. Dilute emissions were also
continuously monitored and recorded on the strip chart recorders. At
each speed, equilibrium of speed and all analyzer traces were maintained
for at least 30 seconds before sampling was started. A minimum sample
volume of two cubic feet and a minimum sample time of three minutes was
collected for analysis in the sample bag.
Following a second preconditioning at 50 miles per hour, the vehicle
was again brought to idle. No sampling was performed during the first
30 seconds of a one minute idle period. In the subsequent 30 seconds,
dilute exhaust was directed through the analytical system. At the end
of the idle period, the Surveillance Driving Sequence and CVS dilute
bag sampling were begun. CVS bag collection and dilute sample monitoring
and recording were continued throughout the driving schedule.
The Surveillance Driving Sequence is made up of 32 acceleration
and deceleration modes between all possible combinations of the idle,
15, 30, 45 and 60 mph cruise modes. Average acceleration and deceler-
ation rates observed in a survey conducted in the Los Angeles Air
Basin are used. In addition, six of the modes are repeated using
acceleration and deceleration rates higher and lower than average rates
observed in the survey.
2-29
-------
2.6.6 Clayton Key Mode Test Procedure
The Clayton Key Mode Test was performed on the same 1975 model
passenger cars and light trucks utilized for Highway Fuel Economy and
Modal Emission Tests. This test, also, was performed only in connection
with the first Evaluation Test Sequence.
This short test, developed by Clayton Manufacturing Company of
El Monte, California, consists of three steady state operating conditions
from which undiluted exhaust samples are taken by the volumetric
procedure.
The Clayton Key Mode Test was preceded by a soak period no longer
than 20 minutes from the last sustained period of vehicle operation. At
the end of this period, the vehicle was operated a maximum of three
minutes at the specified speed and load with the hood open and the
cooling fan on. The Federal Test Procedure inertia weight was engaged
for this test. The test was performed in the order of high cruise, low
cruise and idle. At each speed, equilibrium of vehicle speed and the
HC, CO and NOX analyzer readings were maintained for 30 seconds before
the readings were recorded. Operating conditions are listed in the
table below.
Clayton Key Mode Test Conditions
Vehicle
Class
dbs)
2000 to
2774
2775 to
3774
3775 and
up
Transmission
Range/Gear
Drive or
Third
Drive or
High
Drive or
High
Meter
Dyno Load
hp @ mph
15 (? 38
24 @ 46
30 (? 50
High
Cruise
(mph)
36-38
44-46
48-50
Low
Cruise
(mph)
22-25
29-32
32-35
Idle
Auto-
matic
Trans-
mission
in
Drive
2-30
-------
Following this test, a replicate test was performed using the
same procedures.
2.6.7 Low Speed Cycle Test Procedure
The Low Speed Cycle Test was performed on the thirty-five 1975
model passenger cars used in the HFET, Clayton Key Mode Test and Modal
Emission Measurements. This procedure was also utilized in connection
with tests on twenty-five of the 1972 model-year vehicles. The test was
performed only in connection with the first Evaluation Test Sequence on
each of these vehicles.
The Low Speed Cycle Test is a mass emission test similar to the
Federal Test Procedure in that it consists of cold transient, cold
stabilized and hot transient portions. The cold transient portion is
collected in two parts. The first part is 240 seconds long, covers a
distance of 0.82 miles and has an average speed of 12.28 raph. The
second part is 412 seconds in duration, covers 0.91 miles with an
average speed of 7.97 mph. Corresponding data on the cold stabilized
portion are; 658 seconds long, 2.56 miles and 14.01 mph. These same
data for the hot transient portion are; 652 seconds long, 1.73 miles
and 9.56 mph. Total driving time, excluding the ten minute soak, is
1962 seconds.
Vehicle preconditioning (soak), driving techniques and tolerances
are identical to those of the Federal Test Procedure. Sampling techniques
are also identical except for the dilute exhaust collection of the cold
transient portion in two parts.
2.6.8 High Speed Cycle Test Procedure
*
The High Speed Cycle Test was also performed on the thirty-five
1975 model passenger cars used in the HFET, Clayton Key Mode Test and
2-31
-------
Modal Emission Measurements and the same 1972 models subjected to the
Low Speed Cycle Test. This test was performed only in connection with
Evaluation Test Sequence #1.
The High Speed Cycle Test is also similar to the FTP in that it
contains cold transient, cold stabilized and hot transient test portions,
Unlike the Low Speed Cycle Test, the cold transient portion is completed
in one part. Data on the cold transient portion are 520 seconds and
3.835 miles long and 26.550 mph. These same data on the cold stabilized
portion are 878 seconds and 9.773 miles long and 40.072 mph: and for
the hot transient; 520 and 3.835 miles long and 26.550 mph. Total
driving time, exclusive of the soak, is 1918 seconds.
Vehicle preconditioning (soak), driving techniques and tolerances
are also identical to the Federal Test Procedure as are the sampling
techniques.
2.6.9 Federal Short Cycle Test Procedure
The Federal Short Cycle Test was performed at each test point on
each of the Phase I and each of the Phase II vehicles which failed the
Inspection Test.
The Federal Short Cycle is a 9 mode mass emission test which
incorporates the CVS procedures. Its test time is 125 seconds while
its distance is 0.7536 miles and average speed is 21.7 mph. The
dynamometer loading and transmission shift points are identical to
those of the Federal Test Procedure.
For the purpose of this study, the Federal Short Cycle Test was
preceded by a six minute soak period which began after a sustained
period of vehicle operation. At the start of the soak, the engine is
2-32
-------
stopped and the vehicle hood closed. The underhood cooling fan is on
for the first three minutes and also on for the subsequent period.
After the first three minutes the engine is started and allowed to idle
in neutral the remaining three minutes. The Federal Short Cycle Test
is then conducted with the hood down and the fan on.
2.6.10 Federal Three Mode Test Procedure
Federal Three Mode Tests were also performed at each test point on
each of the Phase I vehicles and those Phase II vehicles that failed the
Inspection Test.
This test is similar to the Clayton Key Mode Test in that tailpipe
sampling by volumetric procedures and three modes of vehicle operation
are features of the test. The three steady state operating modes
simulate the average power which occurs at the appropriate speed on
the FTP. Light-duty vehicles are grouped into four weight classes.
Test conditions are shown in the table which follows.
Vehicle
Federal Three Mode Test Procedure Conditions
Mode
Class
(Ibs)
Up to
2500
2501 to
3500
3501 to
4500
above
4500
Transmission
Range /Gear
Drive/ 3rd
Drive/High
Drive/High
Drive /Hieh
High Speed Low Speed
Speed @ Act Hp Speed @ Act Hp
50 @ 21 30 @ 9
50 @ 26 30 (3 12
50 @ 31 30 @ 15
SO fit ifi ^n ra i«
Idle
Auto.
Trans in
Neutral
and Drive
Manual
Trans in
Neutral
2-33
-------
For the purpose of this study, also, the Federal Three Mode Test
was preceded by a six minute soak. The soak procedures, including fan
operation, the position of the hood and engine starting and operation
are identical to those preceding the Federal Short Cycle described above.
During the test, the vehicle was operated, hood down, fan on, at each
mode until the emission readings became stable. During the test, the FTP
specified inertia weight was engaged.
2.6.11 Converter Efficiency Test
The Converter Efficiency Test was performed on each of the converter
equipped 1975 model-year Phase I and Phase II 1975/1976 model-year vehicles
at each of the test points. This test was performed in conjunction with
the Federal Three Mode Test.
As designed, the Converter Efficiency Test involves measurements
to determine exhaust hydrocarbons (HC), carbon monoxide (CO), oxides of
nitrogen (NOX) and oxygen (02) concentration at two points in the
exhaust stream; one before the converter (downstream of any secondary
or injected air) and one after the converter. The probes installed in
the exhaust system during the vehicle preparation procedures were utilized
for this purpose. Regarding this test, note should be taken of the fact
that tailpipe (after converter) HC, CO and NOX measurements are provided
as part of the Federal Three Mode Test so only the additional tailpipe
02 and before catalyst HC, CO, NOX and 02 readings are required to
complete the Converter Efficiency Test.
This test furnishes an indication of converter efficiency, although
not absolute. Providing a sufficient amount of oxygen is available,
the indication of a catalyst in good working order is a relatively
large reduction (say 70 percent and more) in HC and CO from before to
2-34
-------
after the material. If sufficient 02 is not available, HC and CO
reduction may be nearly zero. Under this latter condition, the catalyst
may be in good working order although no indication of this is provided.
2.6.12 Two Speed Idle Test
The Two Speed Idle Test was performed on all Phase I and Phase II
vehicles in conjunction with the Evaluation Test Sequence. The Sun EPA 75
HC/CO analyzer situated in the dynamometer area was used for this purpose.
The Two Speed Idle Test is a two mode test which entails volumetric
HC, CO and NOx emission measurement while the engine is operated in the
order of 2250 + 100 engine revolutions per minute (rpm), no load, and
idle in neutral. The engine is operated in each of these modes until the
emissions are stable. These stable readings are then recorded. The
test is conducted with the hood closed and a cooling fan in use.
2.6.12.1 Inspection Test
The Inspection Test was performed on all Phase II vehicles as part
of the screening process.
This test is similar to the Two Speed Idle Test except NOX emission
measurements are not taken. The Inspection Test was performed using
the Sun EPA 75 HC/CO analyzer situated in the vehicle maintenance area.
The failure limits were based solely on HC and CO emission measurements
at the low speed idle condition (curb idle in neutral). These limits
were selected to fail 35 percent of the respective segments of the
vehicle population with 36 percent of the failures related to HC and 64
percent of the failures related to CO. Such criterion produced; a number
of vehicles which fail HC only (6%); a number which fail CO only (20%);
and a different number which fail both (13%).
2-35
-------
Inspection Test Failure Limits
Model Year Rejection Limit
HC CO
1975-1976 greater than 250 greater than 2.0
ppm n-hexane mole percent
equivalent
1972-1974 greater than 400 greater than 5.5
ppm n-hexane mole percent
equivalent
The Inspection Test was generally performed within 15 minutes of
the arrival of the vehicle at the inspection site. The site is situated
about four miles from the edge of the population center, which information
is provided to indicate the vehicle was in a warmed-up condition prior
to the test. In this same regard, the high speed idle segment of the
test, which is performed firstly, serves to precondition the engine
prior to the low speed idle emission measurements.
2.6.13 Fuel Lead (Pb) Test
The as-received tank fuel was tested for lead content using a
chemical reagent process. The test was performed in conjunction with
vehicle preparation operations. In addition to the reagent, the test
kit consists of an ultra-violet light source to accelerate the reaction
and a colorimeter to measure fuel sample color changes attributed to
the reagent. Color intensity is related to lead content. The analytical
process has a sensititivity of about 0.001 grams lead/gallon of fuel.
Fuel lead is damaging to catalyst operation if excessive either in
concentration or exposure.
2.6.14 Denver Inspection/Maintenance Evaluation Task Emission Related
Maladjustment and Disablement Inspection Procedures
The Emission Related Maladjustment and Disablement Inspection was
2-36
-------
performed on all Phase I and those Phase II vehicles which failed the
Inspection Test and were subsequently subjected to the Evaluation Test
Sequences and repair process. This inspection was completed after the
first Evaluation Test Sequence but before the engine repair and tune-up
process.
The inspection consisted of visual and functional tests of emission
related components and systems to determine the extent of maladjustment
and disablement to which the test vehicles had been subjected. Details
concerning this inspection are provided in the appendices.
Maladjustment and disablement relative to the emission controls may
be classified for the purposes of this program as being minor and major.
Minor maladjustment would include those actions (or evidence thereof)
relating to the maladjustment of some adjustable engine parameter such
as ignition timing or idle air/fuel mixture. Major disablement would
include those actions (or evidence thereof) which could be construed to
be the willful removal, deactivation or alteration of emission related
parts or components, or replacement with a part or system which, in
essence, does not perform the same function as the original equipment
jpart or system. Major disablement was corrected prior to the performance
of further diagnostic and maintenance work on the vehicle.
;:|
2.6.15 Denver Inspection/Maintenance Evaluation Task Diagnostic
Procedures, Emission-Oriented Tune-up and Documentation Thereof
Engine diagnostic procedures and an emission-oriented tune-up were
performed on all Phase I vehicles and those Phase II vehicles that
failed the Inspection Test.
Prior to any maintenance work on the vehicle, corrosion, oil and
dirt were removed from vital areas to facilitate examination and adjustment
2-37
-------
of these areas. The examination included an inspection for: broken or
cracked parts, hoses, belts, tubing or wires; restricted or binding
cables or levers and; leaking fuel, oil, air or coolant around the carbu-
retor, fuel pump, oil filter, valve covers, transmission or air, water
and gasoline lines. Following this examination, an operational inspection
was made. Such inspection included: starting the engine and listening
for ignition misfire, backfire, noisy fan belts, bearings or air
injection pump, vacuum or exhaust leaks and determining excessive exhaust
smoke, warm-up time, automatic choke release and any additional operational
difficulties. Diagnostic checks were then performed.
Engine diagnostic checks were performed following the specific
sequence, procedures and specifications covered in the vehicle repair
manuals. Such checks included tests to determine the condition of the
engine such as timing, dwell, spark plugs, ignition wiring, points,
condensor and spark coil as well as other electrical components. Such
checks also included tests to determine the condition of the engine
vacuum system including vacuum signal lines and the positive crankcase
ventilation (PCV) valve and system. An emission analysis to determine
the amount of HC and CO in the exhaust at idle and at a no-load
condition of 2250 rpm was additionally a part of the diagnostic procedure.
For the purposes of this program, diagnostic procedures also
involved a check of maintenance records for the vehicle. If the vehicle
was within 1500 miles of manufacturer's major recommended mileage service
point and the maintenance record (or lack thereof) indicated prescribed
maintenance had not been completed, the manufacturer's emission related
service recommendation was performed.
In performing maintenance, the EPA prescribed limitation of $100,
2-38
-------
which was placed on total emission related parts replacement and labor,
was observed. Such limit was based on the total of list (retail) price
for parts and flat-rate manual labor allocated to the specific repair (s),
In conjunction with engine emission related maintenance, the need
for which was determined during the maladjustment and disablement
inspection and the diagnostic procedures, including the maintenance
records check, an emission oriented tune-up was performed. Such tune-up
was to emission specifications as appearing on the EPA required Engine
Emission Control Specification Label and in the service manuals. Any
special tools or testing equipment specified by the manufacturer was
used during the tuning process. Items not regarded as a part of a normal
tune-up were new carburetors or "boil outs", new distributors, head and
:intake manifold gaskets, valve grinding, and engine overhaul although all
of these but valve and cylinder repairs and engine overhaul were regarded
as being within the scope of maintenance if so indicated by the diag-
nostic checks.
After the necessary parts had been replaced or repaired and the
engine was adjusted to manufacturer's specifications, a final HC and CO
emission check was made. A vehicle which failed the standard after
maintenance was re-diagnosed, repaired and re-adjusted using the manu-
facturer's prescribed procedure. Any alteration of the ignition system
or component affecting emissions was followed by a final oscilloscope
and emission check.
Each step in the repair process was documented. Such documentation
included results of the maladjustment and disablement inspection and the
restoration of items on which disablement had been performed, the
Diagnostic process, the repair process and the emission oriented
2-39
-------
adjustment process. Also documented were list costs for installed parts
and flat rate labor relating both to disablement restoration and to the
emission tune-up.
2.6.16 Daily Test Schedule Procedure
The overall schedule was dictated by the tasks to be performed and
the time constraints of the program. These factors, in turn, dictated
the daily dynamometer utilization and testing rate.
Tests were performed on a three shift per day, six day per week
basis. Work shifts began at 8:00 AM, A:00 PM and 12:00 Midnight. Tests
were not generally scheduled between the hours of 8:00 AM and 10:00 AM.
This period was utilized to perform the required daily checks. Weekly
and monthly checks were performed during both scheduled and unscheduled
breaks in the testing schedule. The required maintenance was also
performed on this basis. Vehicle throughput was at a rate of about one
vehicle each three to three and one-half hours.
2.7 DATA HANDLING
2.7.1 Data Collection
Many of the parameters associated with the test were recorded on
strip chart recorders. Included in these parameters were the temperature
of the soak area, underhood cooling air wet and dry bulb temperatures
and temperature of the CVS dilute sample. Recorders tied in to the
Emission Analysis Console were allowed to run continuously during the
prescribed calibration, sample measurement and calibration check sequence.
The Data General NOVA 2 computer, the primary equipment item in the
Data Acquisition System, was utilized to collect and integrate bag and
modal data from the CVS tests. Other of the laboratory data were
collected and recorded manually.
2-40
-------
Upon completion of the vehicle test, all raw data forms, strip
chart recordings and computer punch tape and print-outs pertinent to
the test were assembled and reviewed for completeness and accuracy.
This process included the reduction of temperature traces, verification
of completeness and accuracy of analytical operations and verification
of the vehicle identification and other information. When this review
was completed, the various vehicle test materials were assembled into
one test data packet for processing. Machine copies of the strip chart
temperature recordings were made for submittal along with the raw data
sheets to the EPA's Project Officer in Ann Arbor, Michigan.
2.7.2 Data Processing
Processing was performed by computer operations. Data from the
raw data sheets were combined with punch tape data from the Data
Acquisition System into a single punch tape and fed into our time-share
computer. Within the computer, an edit program was utilized to screen
key-punch and logical errors. Corrections were made as necessary and
raw data were output for proof reading against the input forms. These
output data were further corrected as necessary. The computer processing
programs were then applied and finished copy data were output and
scrutinized in detail. Questionable data were noted and subsequently
returned to the system for further verification and processing.
2.7.3 Calculation of Results
The basic calculations of emission results for several of the
tasks were performed by use of the formulae in 37 Federal Register 221,
36 Federal Register 123 and as amended in 38 Federal Register 124. Fuel
economy data were calculated using the carbon balance equation as supplied
2-41
-------
by the EPA. All tests were performed using the Indolene-type fuels. A
hydrogen/carbon ratio of 1.85 was assumed for these fuels. The methods
used for each test are described in paragraphs which follow.
2.7.3.1 Exhaust Emissions (Federal Test Procedure)^ - Emission results
were calculated as outlined in the Federal Register. In addition, cold
start (1972 FTP equivalent) results were calculated by summing the total
emissions of the cold transient and cold stabilized phases of the test
and dividing the total by 7.5 miles. Hot start results from the cold
test were calculated by summing the total emissions of the hot transient
and cold stabilized phases and dividing by 7.5 miles to obtain grams per
mile. Hot start results from the Hot Start FTP were similarly calculated
using total emissions from the hot transient and hot stabilized portions.
2.7.3.2 Highway Fuel Economy - Fuel Economy data were calculated using
the CVS emission test results as calculated by the equations of the
Federal Register and the fuel economy equation referenced in paragraph
2.7.3. The Highway Fuel Economy Test distance constant of 10.2 miles
per test was applied.
2.7.3.3 Modal Emissions - The formulae of the Federal Register were
used to calculate modal emissions using the mass flow rate of the CVS,
integrated dilute concentration readings and miles per mode. The
humidity correction factor of the Federal Register was not applied to
modal data. Steady state results were calculated using mass flow rate,
sample bag concentrations and the calculated distance traveled per
increment of time. Results of the idle mode were calculated in grams
per minute. Sample bag test results were computed using the distance
constant of 9.789 miles for the SDS. Modal data were combined to
produce integrated emission results equivalent to the bag results.
2-A2
-------
2.7.3.4 Clayton Key Mode Emissions - These data are comprised of tail-
pipe concentrations which were read directly and required no special
treatment.
2.7.3.5 Low and High Speed Cycle Emissions - Data from these two tests
were reduced in accordance with equations used in conjunction with the
FTP. The distance constants listed in paragraphs 2.6.8 and 2.6.9 were
used in place of constants for the FTP.
2.7.3.6 Federal Short Test and Federal Three Mode Emissions - Emission
results of the Federal Short Test were calculated in the FTP manner. A
distance constant of 0.7536 miles was applied.
The Federal Three Mode Test generates undiluted tailpipe emission
data. These data are reported as observed.
2.7.3.7 Converter Efficiency Test - Converter efficiency calculations
were performed using exhaust concentrations as measured before and
after the catalytic converter. The difference between these two readings
was divided by the before converter concentration multiplied by 100.
The resulting value is a decrease in the emittant under consideration
expressed as a percentage.
2.7.3.8 Two Speed Idle Test (Inspection Test) - These data are comprised
of tailpipe concentrations which were read directly and required no
reduction.
2.7.3.9 Fuel Lead (Pb) Content Test - The Fuel Lead Test yields a result
directly in grams per gallon and was used as reported.
2-43
-------
2-44
-------
3. DISCUSSION OF TEST RESULTS
Data reporting formats for the Denver phase of the program are
those same formats used in reporting data for the Houston, Chicago and
Phoenix phases (Publication EPA-460/3-76-001).
Relatively little, if any, discussion accompanies the summarized
emission factor development and other of the data since these data are
self-explanatory.
3.1 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE EMISSIONS AND FUEL ECONOMY
3.1.1 FTP Exhaust Emission Results vs. Model Year
Federal Test Procedure exhaust emission and fuel economv test results
for the one hundred and seventeen passenger cars used in emission factors
development are shown by model year on the one page comprising Table 3
which follows. Shown also are summarized test results for the ninety
1972, 1974 and 1975 model-year vehicles and the one-hundred and seventeen
1972-1975 model-year vehicles. Data are presented in this manner to
facilitate comparison with groups of similar vehicles tested in other
sites in the FY-74 emission factors development program. That is, the
90 car subsample is equivalent in vehicle characteristics to similar 90
car samples in Chicago, Houston and Phoenix.
Also shown in Table 3 are the summarized Highway Fuel Economy Test
results for the thirty-five 1975 model-year passenger cars tested by
this procedure.
3-1
-------
TABLE 3
EXHAUST EMISSION TEST RESULTS VS. MODEL YEAR
DENVER
1972 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
MODEL NUMBER OF AVERAGE
YEAR VEHICLE MILEAGE
1967 0
1968 0
1969 0
1970 0
1971 0
1972 25 40911
1973 27 32801
1974 30 24633
1975 35 13526
TOTALS 0
(#011-510)
TOTALS 90 24835
(#011-100)
TOTALS 1 17 26674
(#011-127)
TOTALS 0
(#011-230)
MODEL NUMBER OF AVERAGE
YEAR VEHICLE MILEAGE
1968 0
1969 0
1970 0
1971 0
1972 25 40911
1973 27 32801
1974 30 24633
1975 35 13526
TOTALS ;*"o
(#011-510) /
TOTALS 90 24835
(#011-100)
TOTALS 1 17 26674
(#011-127)
TOTALS 0
(#011-230)
HC CO C02
MEAN S.D. MEAN S.D. MEAN S.D.
7.08 5.91 93.5 45.5 485.7 137.4
5.16 1.79 88.8 33.0 524.2 166.4
6.05 5.29 93.5 46.3 520.6 147.0
2.66 1.24 56.1 29.5 546.1 143-3
5.02 4.78 78.9 H3.9 520.8 143.4
5.05 4.27 81.2 41.7 521.6 148.3
1975 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
HC CO C02
MEAN S.D. MEAN S.D. MEAN S.D.
6.53 5.67 84.5 42.3 471.4 132.9
4.60 1.61 81.0 32.7 505-9 157-2
5.15 2.74 8J.7 38.5 503.5 140.4
2.22 1.12 48.5 28.5 531-3 137-7
4.40 3.86 70.2 39.7 505.4 137.9
4.44 3-47 72.7 38.4 505.5 141.9
IN ADDITION 35 1975 YEAR MODEL AUTOMOBILES WERE
TESTED FOR HIGHWAY FUEL ECONOMY THE RESULTS ARE:
FUEL ECONOMY
MEAN S.D.
FUEL ECONOMY
NOXC FTP
MEAN S.D. MEAN S.D.
2.62 1.16 13.6 3-33
2.03 1.23 13.1 3-37
1.86 0.85 12.J 3.48
1.65 0.63 13.8 3.39
1.99 0.96 13.4 3.40
2.00 1.02 13-3 3-38
FUEL ECONOMY
NOXC FTP
MEAN S.D. MEAN S.D.
2.68 1.22 14.2 3.41
2.06 1.26 13.7 3-49
1.85 0.84 13.6 3.52
1.62 0.65 14.4 3.55
1.99 0.99 14.1 3.49
2.01 1.05 14.0 3.48
19.6 5.19
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
AUTOMOTIVE TESTING LABORATORIES,INC.
19900 E. COLFAX, AURORA, COLO. 80011
3-2
-------
3.1.2 Exhaust Emission Test Results for 1975 Model Light Trucks
Ten 1975 model-year light-duty trucks were subjected to the Federal
Test Procedure, the Highway Fuel Economy Test and other tests. Exhaust
emission and fuel economy test results by the FTP and fuel economy test
results by the HFET are summarized for these ten vehicles on the one
page comprising Table 4 which follows.
3-3
-------
TABLE 4
EXHAUST EMISSION TEST RESULTS FOR 1975 LIGHT-DUTY TRUCKS
DENVER
1972 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
NUMBER FUEL ECONOMY
OF AVERAGE HC CO C02 NOXC FTP HFET
VEHICLES MILEAGE MEAN S.D. MEAN S.D. MEAN S.D. MEAN S.D. MEAN S.D. MEAN S.D.
10
14099
2.99 2.00 53.2 32.8 610.9 50.5 1.84 0.77 12.6 0.70 17.9 1.44
1975 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
NUMBER FUEL ECONOMY
OF AVERAGE HC CO C02 NOXC FTP HFET
VEHICLES MILEAGE MEAN S.D. MEAN S.D. MEAN S.D. MEAN S.D. MEAN S.D. MEAN S.D.
10
14099
2.53 1.89 45.6 33.7 598.2 49.7 1-75 0.72 13-1 0.74 17.9 1.44
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
AUTOMOTIVE TESTING LABORATORIES.INC.
19900 E. COLFAX, AURORA, COLO. 80011
3-4
-------
3.1.3 Vehicles Meeting Federal Exhaust Emission Standards
3.1.3.1 Vehicles Meeting Federal 1972, 1973/1974 and 1975 Exhaust Emission
Standards - Summary data on all emission factors development vehicles
tested in the Denver site relative to each of the 1972, 1973/1974 and
1975 Federal Exhaust Emission Standards are presented on the three pages
comprising Table 5 which follows.
These data are further summarized below.
Vehicles Meeting 1972 Standards
Ninety 1972. 1974 and 1975 Models
HC
(<3.A gm/mi)
(No.) (%) '
30
33.3
CO
gm/mi)
(NO.;
10
(%)
11.1
Passed Both
(No.)
10
(%)
11.1
Vehicles Meeting 1973/1974 Standards
Ninety 1972. 1974 and 1975 Models
HC
(<3.4 gm/mi)
(No.) (%)
30
33.3
CO
(<39 gm/mi)
(No.) (%)
10
11.1
NO,
(<370 gm/mi)
(No.) (7)
79
87.8
Passed
All Three
(No.) (%)
10
11.1
Vehicles Meeting 1975 Standards
Ninety 1972. 197A and 1975 Models
HC
(51.5 gm/mi)
(No.) (%)
8
8.9
CO
(<15 gm/mi
[No.) 00
2 2.2
NO,
CS3.1 gm/mi)
CNo.) (%)
79
87.8
Passed
All Three
2.2
3-5
-------
Vehicles Meeting 1972 Standards
One Hundred and Seventeen 1972-1975 Models
HC CO
gm/mi) (S39 em/mi) Passed Both
(%) (No.) (%) (No.) (%)
28.2 10 8.5 10 8.5
Vehicles Meeting 1973/1974 Standards
One Hundred and Seventeen 1972-1975 Models
HC CO NOxe Passed
(S3.4 gm/miT (£39 gm/miT" (^3.0 gm/miT All Three
(No.) (Z)"" (No.) (%)" (No.) (%)" TNoTTfF
33 28.2 10 8.5 102 87.2 10 8.5
Vehicles Meeting 1975 Standards
One Hundred and Seventeen 1972-1975 Models
HC CO NOxc Passed
(<1.5 gm/mi) (*15 gm/mi)"" (*3.1 gm/miT All Three
(No.) (%)" (No.) (%)" (No.) (%) (No.) (%)"
8 6.8 2 1,7 102 87.2 2 1.7
3-6
-------
TABLE 5
VEHICLES MEETING FEDERAL STANDARDS
DENVER
1972 FEDERAL STANDARDS
MODEL
YEAR
1967
.1968
1969
1970
£
?1971
[1972
[1973
i
1974
?
J1975
TOTALS
i( # 0 1 1 -
TOTALS
(#011-
\
TOTALS
HC CO
# OF <3.4 GM/MI ^39 GM/MI
VEH. NO. % NO. %
0
0
0
'0
0
25 0 0.0 0 0.0
27 3 11.1 0 0.0
30 3 10.0 0 0.0
35 27 77.1 10 28.6
0
510)
90 30 33-3 10 11.1
100)
117 33 28.2 10 8.5
PASSED BOTH
NO. %
0 0.0
0 0.0
0 0.0
10 28.6
10 11.1
10 8.5
(#011-127)
TOTALS 0
(#011-230)
AUTOMOTIVE TESTING LABORATORIES,INC.
19900 E. COLFAX, AURORA, COLO. 80011
3-7
-------
TABLE 5, CONT'D
VEHICLES MEETING FEDERAL STANDARDS
DENVER
1973/1974 FEDERAL STANDARDS
MODEL
YEAR
1967
1968 •
1969
1970
1971
1972
1973
1974
1975
TOTALS
(#011-5
TOTALS
(#011-1
TOTALS
# OF
VEH.
0
0
0
0
0
25
27
30
35
0
10)
90
00)
117
HC CO NOX PASSED
_<3.4 GM/MI <39 GM/MI <3-0 GM/MI ALL THREE
NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. %
0 0.0 0 0.0 17 68.0 0 0.0
311.1 0 0.0 23 85.2 0 0.0
3 10.0 0 0.0 28 93-3 0 0.0
27 77.1 10 28.6 34 97.1 10 28.6
30 33.3 10 11.1 79 87.8 10 11.1
33 28.2 10 8.5 102 87.2 10 8.5
(#011-127)
TOTALS 0
(#011-230)
AUTOMOTIVE TESTING LABORATORIES,INC.
19900 E. COLFAX, AURORA, COLO. 80011
3-8
-------
TABLE 5, CONT'D
VEHICLES MEETING FEDERAL STANDARDS
DENVER
1975 FEDERAL STANDARDS
MODEL
YEAR
1967
1968
1969
1970
1971
1972
1973
1974
1975
TOTALS
(#011-5
TOTALS
(#011-1
TOTALS
# OF
VEH.
0
0
0
•o
0
25
27
30
35
0
10)
90
00)
117
HC CO NOX PASSED
^1.5 GM/MI ^15 GM/MI <3 . 1 GM/MI ALL THREE
NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. %
0 0.0 0 0.0 17 68.0 0 0.0
0 0.0 0 0.0 23 85.2 0 0.0
0 0.0 0 0.0 28 93-3 0 0.0
8 22.9 2 5.7 34 97.1 2 5.7
8 8.9 2 2.2 79 87.8 2 2.2
8 6.8 2 1.7 102 87.2 2 1.7
(#011-127)
TOTALS 0
(#011-230)
AUTOMOTIVE TESTING LABORATORIES,INC .
19900 E. COLFAX, AURORA, COLO. 80011
3-9
-------
3.1.3.2 Light Trucks Meeting Federal Exhaust Emission Standards -
Summary data on the ten trucks tested In Denver relative to the 1972 and
1973/1974 light-duty vehicle and the 1975 light-duty truck Federal
Exhaust Emission Standards are presented on the one page comprising
Table 6 which follows.
3-10
-------
TABLE 6
1975 LIGHT-DUTY TRUCKS MEETING FEDERAL STANDARDS
DENVER
1975 FEDERAL STANDARDS FOR LIGHT-DUTY TRUCKS
NO. OF
MODEL
CHEVROLET
DODGE
FORD
CMC
VEH.
4
1
4
1
<2.0
NO.
1
0
1
1
HC
CO
GM/MI
25
0
25
100
*
.0
.0
.0
.0
<20
NO.
1
0
1
1
N
GM/MI <3.1
25
0
25
100
%
.0
.0
.0
.0
NO.
4
1
4
1
OX
GM/MI
100
100
100
100
%
.0
.0
.0
.0
PA
ALL
NO.
1
0
1
1
SSED
THREE
25
0
25
100
*
.0
.0
.0
.0
TOTALS
10
30.0
30.0
10 100.0
30.0
1973/1974 FEDERAL STANDARDS
N
MODEL
CHEVROLET
DODGE
FORD
CMC
0. OF
VEH.
4
1
4
1
HC
<3.4 GM/MI
NO
2
0
4
1
*
50
0
100
100
*
.0
.0
.0
.0
<39
NO
2
0
1
1
CO
GM/MI <3.
%
50.
0.
25.
100.
0
0
0
0
NO
3
1
4
1
NOX
0 GM/MI
•
75
100
100
100
*
.0
.0
.0
.0
PASSED
ALL THREE
NO
1
0
1
1
•
25
0
25
100
*
.0
.0
.0
.0
TOTALS
10
70.0
40.0
90.0
30.0
1972 FEDERAL STANDARDS
HC
CO
NO. OF
MODEL VEH.
CHEVROLET
DODGE
FORD
CMC
4
1
4
1
<3.4 GM/MI
NO. %
2
0
4
1
1
1
50
0
00
00
.0
.0
.0
.0
<39 GM/MI
NO. %
2
0
1
1
50.
0.
25.
100.
0
0
0
0
PASSED BOTH
NO. %
2
0
1
1
50
0
25
100
.0
.0
.0
.0
TOTALS
10
70.0
40.0
40.0
AUTOMOTIVE TESTING LABORATORIES,INC.
19900 E. COLFAX, AURORA, COLO. 80011
3-11
-------
3.1.3.3 1972'Vehicles Meeting Federal 1972 Exhaust Emission Standards -
Summary data on the 1972 models tested in the Denver site relative to
the 1972 Federal Exhaust Emission Standards are presented on the one
page comprising Table 7 which follows.
3-12
-------
TABLE 7
1972 VEHICLES MEETING 1972 FEDERAL STANDARDS
DENVER
1972 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
NO. OF
MODEL VEH.
AMC
BUICK
CADILLAC
CHEVROLET
CHRYSLER
DODGE
FORD
LINCOLN
MERCURY
iOLDSMOBILE
[PLYMOUTH
PONTIAC
'IMPORTS
i
ICAPRI
;DATSUN
OPEL
[TOYOTA
i
VW
1
1
1
6
0
1
5
0
1
1
2
2
0
1
0
1
2
HC
<3.4 GM/MI
NO. %
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
CO
<39 GM/MI
NO. %
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 .
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
PASSED BOTH
NO. %
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
TOTALS
25
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
AUTOMOTIVE TESTING^ LABORATORIES,INC.
19900 E. COLFAX, AURORA, COLO. 80011
3-13
-------
3.1.3.A 1973 Vehicles Meeting Federal 1973 Exhaust Emission Standards -
Summary data on the 1973 models tested In the Denver site relative to
the 1973 Federal Exhaust Emission Standards are presented on the one page
comprising Table 8 which follows.
3-14
-------
TABLE 8
1973 VEHICLES MEETING 1973 FEDERAL STANDARDS
DENVER
1973 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
NO. OF
MODEL VEH.
AMC
BUICK
CADILLAC
CHEVROLET
CHRYSLER
DODGE
FORD
LINCOLN
MERCURY
OLDSMOBILE
PLYMOUTH
PONTIAC
IMPORTS
CAPRI
DATSUN
MAZDA
OPEL
TOYOTA
VW
1
1
1
6
0
1
5
0
1
2
2
2
0
1
0
1
1
2
NO
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
HC
* GM
0
0
0
16
0
0
0
50
0
0
0
0
0
50
/MI
.0
.0
.0
.7
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
c
~NO.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
GM/MI
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
NO
0
1
1
6
0
5
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
2
NOX
0 GM/MI
0
100
100
100
0
100
100
100
50
50
100
100
100
100
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
PA
ALL
NO.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
SSE
THR
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
D
EE
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
TOTALS
27
11.1
0
0.0
23 85.2
0
0.0
AUTOMOTIVE TESTING LABORATORIES,INC.
19900 E. COLFAX, AURORA, COLO. 80011
3-15
-------
3.1.3.5 1974 Vehicles Meeting Federal 1974 Exhaust Emission Standards
Summary data on the 1974 models tested in the Denver site relative to
the 1974 Federal Exhaust Emission Standards are presented on the one
page comprising Table 9 which follows.
3-16
-------
TABLE 9
1974 VEHICLES MEETING 1974 FEDERAL STANDARDS
DENVER
1974 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
NO. OF
MODEL VEH.
AMC
BUICK
CADILLAC
CHEVROLET
CHRYSLER
DODGE
FORD
LINCOLN
MERCURY
OLDSMOBILE
PLYMOUTH
PONTIAC
IMPORTS
CAPRI
DATSUN
MAZDA
OPEL
TOYOTA
VW
1
2
0
6
0
2
5
1
1
3
2
2
0
1
1
0
1
2
HC
j<3.4 GM/MI
NO. %
0
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
50
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
CO
_<39 GM/MI
NO. %
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
<3-
NO
1
1
6
2
5
1
1
2
2
2
1
1
1
2
NOX
0 GM/MI
%
100
50
100
100
100
100
100
66
100
100
100
100
100
100
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.7
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
PA
ALL
NO.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
SSED
THREE
%
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
TOTALS
30
10.0
0.0
28
93-3
0
0.0
AUTOMOTIVE TESTING LABORATORIES,INC.
19900 E. COLFAX, AURORA, COLO. 80011
3-17
-------
3.1.3.6 1975 Vehicles Meeting Federal 1975 Exhaust Emission Standards -
Summary data on the 1975 models tested in the Denver site relative to
the 1975 Federal Exhaust Emission Standards are presented on the one
page comprising Table 10 which follows.
3-18
-------
TABLE 10
1975 VEHICLES MEETING 1975 FEDERAL STANDARDS
DENVER
1975 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
NO. OF
MODEL VEH.
AMC
BUICK
CADILLAC
CHEVROLET
CHRYSLER
DODGE
FORD
LINCOLN
MERCURY
OLDSMOBILE
PLYMOUTH
PONTIAC
IMPORTS
AUDI
CAPRI
COLT
DATSUN
FIAT
HONDA
MAZDA
MERC.-BENZ
MG
OPEL
PORSCHE
TOYOTA
VW
VOLVO
1
3
1
6
1
2
5
0
2
3
2
3
0
1
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
2
0
HC
_<1 .5 GM/MI
NO. %
0
0
0
3
0
0
2
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
50
0
0
40
50
0
0
33
0
0
0
0
50
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.3
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
CO
_<15 GM/
NO.
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
16
0
0
20
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
MI
%
.0
.0
.0
.7
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
<3-
NO
0
3
1
6
1
2
5
2
3
2
3
1
1
1
1
2
NOX
1 GM
0
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
/MI
%
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
PASSED
ALL THREE
NO. %
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
16
0
0
20
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.0
.0
.0
.7
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
TOTALS
35
8 22.9
5.7 34 97.1
AUTOMOTIVE TESTING LABORATORIES,INC.
19900 E. COLFAX, AURORA, COLO. 80011
5.7
3-19
-------
3.2 HIGHWAY FUEL ECONOMY AND EMISSIONS
Fuel economy and emission data developed by the Highway Fuel
Economy Test are summarized in the one page comprising Table 11 which
follows.
3-20
-------
TABLE 11
HIGHWAY FUEL ECONOMY TEST
DENVER
MFC.
A.M.C.
G.M.
CHRY.
FORD
IMPORTS
TRUCKS
NUMBER OF
VEHICLE
1
16
5
7
6
10
AVERAGE
MILEAGE
8197
12615
11956
18221
10092
11099
HC
MEAN S.D.
1.09
1.09
0.95
0.83
1.15
0.66
0.00
1.19
0.71
0.81
0.53
0.16
CO
MEAN S.D.
8.3
35.5
23.5
27.8
25.1
15.7
0.0
39-3
16.3
22.3
18.6
13.3
C02
MEAN S.D.
321.9
111.9
399.8
160.6
216.8
169.8
0.0
83-3
110.6
66.8
17-6
11.8
NOXC
MEAN S.D.
2.76
1.70
2.37
1.79
2.52
2.12
0.00
0.80
0.62
0.66
1.56
1.31
FUEL ECONOMY
FTP
MEAN S.D.
26.0
17.7
20.2
17.5
30.6
17.9
0.00
3-78
1.11
2.96
3.89
1.11
TOTALS
15
13651
0.95 0.85
26.6 27.5
117.7 100.1
2.08 1.05
19.2 1.50
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
AUTOMOTIVE TESTING LABORATORIES.INC.
19900 E. COLFAX, AURORA, COLO. fio011
3-21
-------
3.3 MODAL EMISSIONS AND FUEL ECONOMY
Mean modal emissions and fuel economy data developed by the
Surveillance Driving Sequence and Steady State Procedures are summarized
on the one page comprising Table 12 which follows.
Within the Surveillance Driving Sequence, the highest mass HC and
NOX emissions were measured during the acceleration modes with the
deceleration modes producing the lowest HC and NOX emissions. The same
is true for CO emissions with accelerations at the higher speeds
producing the greatest mass CO emission. Best fuel economy during the
Surveillance Driving Sequence appears during the deceleration modes,
particularly those encompassing the higher speeds.
Steady state data indicate a general lowering of mass HC and CO
emissions as the off-idle speed increases. NOX emissions, however,
increase with increasing speed. Of the steady state speeds measured,
best fuel economy appears at 30 miles per hour.
Agreement between the actual bag and calculated bag results is well
within 5 percent for each of the exhaust components measured.
3-22
-------
TABLE 12
SUMMARY OF MODAL EMISSIONS RESULTS ON
45 1975 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
DENVER
MODE FROM-TO
NO. (MPH)
1
2
3
4
5
6
I
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
.16
n
18
19
20
A 21
-22
o, 23
|24
|25
I2Z
f$* o Q
.^. tO
"•/**,
-$29
JfS 30
I32
J TOTAL
5s TOTAL
33
34
35
36
31
38
00-30
30-00
00-15
V \S t J
15-30
30-45
45-30
30-60
60-45
45-60
60-15
15-60
60-00
00-60
60-30
30-15
15-00
00-45
45-15
15-45
45-00
00-60
60-00
00-30
30-60
60-30
30-00
00-60
60-00
00-30
30-60
60-30
30-00
DISTANCE TIME
(MILES) (SEC)
0.0602
0.0741
0.0201
0.0705
0.1360
0.1268
0.2163
0.1716
0.2043
0.3367
0.3136
0.1973
0.3313
0.2994
0.0579
0.0173
0.1759
0.1392
0.1528
0 . 1 304
0.2654
0.2634
0.0737
0.3134
0.2362
0.0444
0.4009
0.3293
0.0886
0.2S99
0.1813
0.0592
12
16
8
11
13
12
17
12
14
30
26
21
32
23
8
22
16
18
19
25
28
15
25
18
10
38
35
18
21
14
13
CALCULATED RESULTS
BAG RESULTS
IDLE
5 MPH
10 MPH
15 MPH
30 MPH
45 MPH
STEADY STATE
STEADY STATE
STEADY STATE
STEADY STATE
STEADY STATE
HC
5.
1.
4.
2.
1.
0.
3-
0.
1.
1.
3.
1.
3-
1.
0.
2.
3-
1.
?.
•
5.
1.
3.
2.
1.
1.
2.
1.
3-
1!
1 .
1.
0.
3.
1.
1.
0.
0.
62
20
21
55
90
81
96
90
99
PJ
83
49
88
04
77
13
89
00
1 3
21
11
33
82
40
11
07
97
17
19
M
13
95
91
28
12
66
17
70
55
CO
180.7
23.8
121.8
72.6
63-4
11.1
233.8
13.4
101.3
12.8
214i8
199-3
13.1
18.0
52.4
151.6
14.1
133-0
17-1
286.1
16.5
117.4
125.1
13.5
24.0
1 36 . 8
16.1
99.8
186.2
14.1
25.1
73.5
73.1
6.1
61.5
30.3
21.9
12.3
10.6
C02
1015
316
1148
712
600
212
661
242
587
229
684
239
732
221
240
599
782
216
730
256
766
244
914
604
215
327
2$
826
625
213
313
464
470
76
950
594
415
349
372
.2
.9
•*
.0
.1
.1
.3
.1
.9
.5
-7
.5
.8
.6
.2
.4
.4
. 7
•4
.3
.1
.4
.0
.9
5
.'9
.6
.4
.2
.5
.6
.9
.3
.2
3
.2
:l
NOX
o!
2.
2.
2.
0.
r.
3-
0.
3-
0.
3-
0.
0.
0.
3-
0.
3 .
0.
3-
0.
3-
0.
0.
0.
2.
2.
0.
0.
2.
2.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
1.
90
47
03
23
91
54
00
06
46
76
52
82
I2
80
48
67
63
45
36
49
35
78
37
31
83
66
69
79
73
g;
56
01
07
06
62
35
32
85
27
FUEL
ECON
24 .'78
6.56
10.63
12.58
38.23
8.5?
33-34
11-79
35-02
8.66
33-14
8.39
36.13
32.71
12.89
8.59
36.71
9-35
30.90
7.20
32.36
7 99
10.98
36.89
24.09
9.82
32.16
8.93
9-56
37-13
24.89
15-14
15-00
102.18
8.40
13-71
19-58
23-91
22.70
39
60 MPH STEADY STATE
0.91
28.4
441.2
2.85 18.16
EMISSION^RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE (PER MINUTE FOR IDLE)
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON (MINUTES PER GALLON FOR IDLE)
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
3-23
-------
3.A CLAYTON KEY MODE AND REPLICATE EMISSIONS
Clayton Key Mode results from the forty-five vehicles subjected
to this test are summarized on the one page comprising Table 13 which
follows. A replicate of this test was performed. Summarized results
are an average of the two tests on each vehicle.
The units in Table 13 are: CO in mole percent (NDIR); HC in ppm
n-hexane (NDIR) and NOx in ppm (CL as NO).
3-24
-------
TABLE 13
SUMMARY OF CLAYTON KEY MODE MEASUREMENTS
DENVER
NO.
HIGH CRUISE
CO HC NOX
LOW CRUISE
CO HC NOX
CO
IDLE
HC
NOX
LIGHT-DUTY TRUCKS
CHEVROLET
DODGE
FORD
GMC
DOMESTICS
AMC
BUICK
CADILLAC
CHEVROLET
CHRYSLER
DODGE
FORD
LINCOLN
MERCURY
OLDSMOBILE
PLYMOUTH
PONTIAC
IMPORTS
AUDI
BMW
CAPRI
COLT
DATSUN
FIAT
HONDA
MAZDA
MERC . -BENZ
MG
OPEL
PORSCHE
SAAB
SUBARU
TOYOTA
VW
VOLVO
4
1
4
1
1
3
6
1
2
5
0
2
3
2
3
0
0
1
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
2
0
0.93
0.03
0.55
0.03
0.57
3.12
9-90
2.04
2.20
0.11
0.92
1.11
3.30
1.49
4.10
6.65
1.30
2.80
1.18
0.97
43
10
52
27
90
92
290
89
3°
46
70
142
82
155
205
145
115
57
135
816.
860.
845.
945.
1990.
713-
116.
764.
1157.
1354.
825.
890.
643.
1182.
511.
202.
1654.
660.
798.
1128.
11
05
68
1}
\l
22
15
42
74
31
10
92
04
94
37
59
01
1.88
0.12
0.42
0.03
1.22
2.77
3.45
0.77
0.07
1.17
1.08
1.57
2.02
0.42
1.02
8.75
1.10
1.80
1.15
1.85
78
10
50
25
155
132
170
53
10
143
46
71
139
68
83
325
175
52
30
173
245.26
969.48
368.16
317.39
1966.02
195.52
399-30
545.73
563.11
1423-26
277.20
142.69
257-71
1474.52
489-10
126.28
1231.87
126.28
86.68
371.57
2.68
1.60
0.75
0.03
1.70
1.51
2.90
1.81
0.05
7-37
1.75
2.37
1.72
1.76
0.65
7-55
3.40
2.15
3-95
2.76
108
87
63
20
202
153
290
111
25
392
83
138
168
66
122
270
252
90
205
122
60.94
66.64
104.64
171.73
358.34
46.26
95.08
161.46
78.16
50.85
75.18
79.66
&1.67
59-62
67.32
61.13
65.13
41.59
52.11
48.60
TOTALS
45 1.92 87 854.73 1.43
501.15 2.17 133
90.23
3-25
-------
3.5 LOW AND HIGH SPEED CYCLE EMISSIONS AND FUEL ECONOMY
3.5.1 Low Speed Driving Cycle
As mentioned earlier, the Low Speed Cycle Test is similar to the
1975 Federal Test Procedure in that it consists of cold transient, cold
stabilized and hot transient test portions. The hot transient portion
follows a 10 minute soak. Total driving time, exclusive of the soak,
is 1962 seconds. Driving techniques and tolerances are identical to
those of the FTP.
Sampling techniques are also Identical to those of the FTP although
gathering of emissions from the cold transient portion requires two
sample bags; one sample bag for the first 240 seconds of the sequence
and another for the remaining 412 seconds of this portion. Exhaust
emissions from each of the other portions are gathered in individual
sample bags.
Calculations of results are done in accordance with those prescribed
for the FTP. The mileages and times for use in the calculations are
listed below.
Phase
Cold Transient 1
Cold Transient (cont.) 2
Cold Stabilized 3
Hot Transient 4
Time
(sees.)
240
412
658
652
Distance
(Miles)
0.82
0.91
2.56
1.73
Average
Speed (mph)
12.28
7.97
14.01
9.56
Low Speed Driving Cycle emission and fuel economy test results for
twenty-five 1972 and thirty-five 1975 models from the site are summarized
i
on the one page comprising Tables 14 and 15 which follows the next
paragraph.
3-26
-------
3.5.2 High Speed Driving Cycle
This cycle is also similar to the 1975 Federal Test Procedure in
that it consists of cold transient, cold stabilized and hot transient
portions. The hot transient portion follows a ten minute soak. Total
Driving time, exclusive of the soak, is 1918 seconds. Driving techniques
and tolerances are identical to those of the FTP. Sampling techniques
are also identical to those of the FTP; exhaust emissions and background
air from each of the portions are gathered in individual sample bags.
Calculations of results are done in accordance with those prescribed
for the FTP. The mileages and times for use in the calculations are
listed below.
Time Distance Average
Phase Bag (sees.) (Miles) Speed (mph)
Cold Transient 1 520 3.835 26.550
Cold Stabilized 2 878 9.773 40.072
Hot Transient 3 520 3.835 26.550
High Speed Driving Cycle emission and fuel economy test results for
the twenty-five 1972 and thirty-five 1975 models from each site are
summarized in the one page comprising Tables 14 and 15 which follow this
paragraph.
3-27
-------
TABLE 11
SUMMARY OF LOW SPEED CYCLE MEASURMENTS
DENVER
1975 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
MODEL
YEAR
NUMBER OF
VEHICLES
HC CO
MEAN S.D. MEAN S.D.
C02
MEAN S.D.
NOXC
MEAN S.D.
FUEL ECONOMY
FTP
MEAN S.D.
1967
1969
1970
1971
1972
1975
0
0
0
0
0
25
0
0
35
9.14 7.69 121.7 57.8 589.1 185.9 2.11 1.07 11.0 3.01
3.20 1.60 56.9 36.1 671.6 178.1 1.55 0.68 11.5 2.79
TOTALS
60
5.67 5.85 83.9 56.1 637.2 184.'
1.91 0.96 11.3 2.88
TABLE 15
SUMMARY OF HIGH SPEED CYCLE MEASURMENTS
DENVER
1975 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
MODEL
YEAR
1967
1966
1969
1970
1971
1972
m
1975
TOTALS
NUMBER OF
VEHICLES
0
0
0
0
0
25
0
0
35
60
HC CO
MEAN S.D. MEAN S.D.
C02
MEAN S.D.
NOXC
MEAN S.D.
FUEL ECONOMY
FTP
MEAN S.D.
4.64 4.62 55.1 24.7 392.1 112.7 3-74 1.60 18.0 4.57
1.47 0.90 36.1 27.5 437.3 112.9 1.96 1.02 17.8 4.51
2.79 3.41 44.0 27.8 418.4 114.1 2.70 1.55 17.9 4.50
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
3-28
-------
3.6 FEDERAL SHORT CYCLE AND FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST EMISSIONS
On the three pages comprising Table 16 which follows this paragraph
are shown Federal Test Procedure, Federal Short Cycle and Federal Three
Mode test results from one hundred 1975 model-year vehicles in the
Denver site.
The Federal Short Test was developed using time in mode (i.e. idle,
acceleration, steady state and deceleration) criteria to represent a
shortened version of the LA-4 (FTP Driving Schedule). Sampling techniques
are similar to those used with the Federal Test Procedure but only one
CVS bag is utilized. Results from this test are compared with FTP
results as a means to correlate the results from the two tests.
The Federal Three Mode Test consists of three steady state operating
modes similar to the Clayton Key Mode Test with the dynamometer loads
simulating the average power which occurs at the appropriate speed on
the FTP. For this test, all light-duty vehicles are grouped into four
weight classes. The FTP inertia weights were engaged during the test.
The vehicle is operated in each mode until exhaust emissions stabilize.
Undiluted emissions are then measured by volume concentration.
In Table 16, units are as follows:
HC, CO, C02 and NOX in grams per mile for the Federal Test
Procedure.
HC, CO, C02 and NOX in grams per mile for the Federal Short
Test.
HC in ppm n-hexane (NDIR), CO in mole percent (NDIR) and
NOX in ppm (CL as NO) for the Federal Three Mode Test.
3-29
-------
TABLE 16
SUMMARY OF FEDERAL SHORT TEST.FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST & FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
1975 YEAR MODEL VEHICLES
DENVER
MAKE
NUMBER OF
VEHICLES
TEST
FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
HC
MEAN S.D.
CO
MEAN S.D.
C02
MEAN S.D.
MEAN
NOX
S.D.
AMC
6 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
FEDERAL SHORT TEST
FEDERAL THREE MODE 50 MPH
30 MPH
5 VEHICLES IDLE DRIVE
IDLE NEUTRAL
0.84
0.54
70.83 35.84
99.17 47.79
137-00 93-05
120 50 73.14
482.0 89.6
399-5 70.5
BUICK 5 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
FEDERAL SHORT TEST
FEDERAL THREE MODE 50 MPH
30 MPH
5 VEHICLES IDLE DRIVE
IDLE NEUTRAL
CADILLAC 1 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
FEDERAL SHORT TEST
FEDERAL THREE MODE 50 MPH
30 MPH
1 VEHICLES IDLE DRIVE
IDLE NEUTRAL
2.57
2.16
115.00
139.00
0.92
343.00 165 67
306.00 174.44
6.71
4.98
310 00
340.00
700.00
1000.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
4:62
27-40
55 31
0 79
0.00
0 00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
525.9 89.1
406.0 51.3
622.8 0.0
521.0 0.0
62.13
.07
106
32.07
20.04
0.29
0.47
290.70
560.77
180.56
24.70
0.00
0.00
0 00
0.00
0 00
0.00
CHEVROLET 16 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
FEDERAL SHORT TEST
FEDERAL THREE MODE 50 MPH
30 MPH
14 VEHICLES IDLE DRIVE
IDLE NEUTRAL
121.37 110.
27.22
28.53
1.19
1.30
2.65
2.75
529.1 126.7
429-9 104.6
1.62
1-17
870.55
502.82
180.32
50.98
305.96
232.97
170.49
21.74
CHRYSLER
1 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE 3.36
FEDERAL SHORT TEST 2.22
FEDERAL THREE MODE 50 MPH 150.00
30 MPH 170.00
1 VEHICLES IDLE DRIVE 200.00
IDLE NEUTRAL 190 00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
551.1 0.0
465.9 0.0
2.09
2.67
819.07
1244.32
65.13
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
DODGE
FORD
5 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
FEDERAL SHORT TEST
FEDERAL THREE MODE 50 MPH
30 MPH
5 VEHICLES IDLE DRIVE
IDLE NEUTRAL
14 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
FEDERAL SHORT TEST
FEDERAL THREE MODE 50 MPH
30 MPH
11 VEHICLES IDLE DRIVE
IDLE NEUTRAL
31.64
5.36 25
1l»5.89 H
B:i
534.4 120.5
441.9 94.5
607.4 117 4
502.7 103.5
0.25
0.59
215-41
245.55
28 91
20
LINCOLN 1 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
FEDERAL SHORT TEST
FEDERAL THREE MODE 50 MPH
30 MPH
1 VEHICLES IDLE DRIVE
IDLE NEUTRAL
I.JI
0.88
20.00
35.00
95 00
50.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0 00
0 00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
832.5 0.0
690.9 0.0
1.62
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
MERCURY
OLDSMOBILE
PLYMOUTH
PONTIAC
5 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
FEDERAL SHORT TEST
FEDERAL THREE MODE 50 MPH
30 MPH
5 VEHICLES IDLE DRIVE
IDLE NEUTRAL
5 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
FEDERAL SHORT TEST
FEDERAL THREE MODE 50 MPH
30 MPH
5 VEHICLES IDLE DRIVE
IDLE NEUTRAL
O.l!
0.49
0.42
41.47
-.82
47.00
7.0.00 79.77
121.00 Ilf,94
69.00 68.7
2.51 0.88
1.43 0.84
128.00 27.97
130.00 47.43
144.00 127.35
185.00 171.1
10.36
10.55
6 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
FEDERAL SHORT TEST
FEDERAL THREE MODE 50 MPH
30 MPH
5 VEHICLES IDLE DRIVE
IDLE NEUTRAL
3.31
2.45
110.00
217! ol
195.00
1.47
1.15
35.07
41.79
95.24
123.3
6 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
FEDERAL SHORT TEST
FEDERAL THREE MODE 50 MPH
30 MPH
6 VEHICLES IDLE DRIVE
IDLE NEUTRAL
01 1.26
"
666. (
549.'
532.6
439.8
551.8
450.4
545
44.0
23.8
80.4
71.0
147-8
120.2
50.10
2.14
1.85
2.8
52.95
9 63!
I I
1.85
1.43
.07
•2P
3.24
1.50
3-30
-------
TABLE 16 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF FEDERAL SHORT TES^FEDERAL^HREE^OD^TEST 4 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
DENVER
1
MAKE '
AUDI
BMW
CAPRI
GOLT
DATSUN
llAT
HONDA
MAZDA
MERC.-BENZ
MG
OPEL
PORSCHE
MIMHEH OF TEST
VEHICLES FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
1 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
FEDERAL SHORT TEST
FEDERAL THREE MODE 50 MPH
30 MPH
0 VEHICLES IDLE DRIVE
2 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
FEDERAL SHORT TEST
FEDERAL THREE MODE 50 MPH
30 MPH
0 VEHICLES IDLE DRIVE
1 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
FEDERAL SHORT TEST
FEDERAL THREE MODE 50 MPH
30 MPH
1 VEHICLES IDLE DRIVE
IDLE NEUTRAL
1 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
FEDERAL SHORT TEST
FEDERAL THREE MODE 50 MPH
30 MPH
0 VEHICLES IDLE DRIVE
IDLE NEUTRAL
3 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
FEDERAL SHORT TEST
FEDERAL THREE MODE 50 MPH
30 MPH
1 VEHICLES IDLE DRIVE
IDLE NEUTRAL
2 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
FEDERAL SHORT TEST
FEDERAL THREE MODE 50 MPH
30 MPH
0 VEHICLES IDLE DRIVE
IDLE NEUTRAL
2 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
FEDERAL SHORT TEST
FEDERAL THREE MODE 50 MPH
30 MPH
0 VEHICLES IDLE DRIVE
IDLE NEUTRAL
2 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
FEDERAL SHORT TEST
FEDERAL THREE MODE 50 MPH
30 MPH
0 VEHICLES IDLE DRIVE
IDLE NEUTRAL
1 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
FEDERAL SHORT TEST
FEDERAL THREE MODE 50 MPH
30 MPH
1 VEHICLES IDLE DRIVE
IDLE NEUTRAL
1 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
FEDERAL SHORT TEST
FEDERAL THREE MODE 50 MPH
30 MPH
0 VEHICLES IDLE DRIVE
IDLE NEUTRAL
1 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
FEDERAL SHORT TEST
FEDERAL THREE MODE 50 MPH
« , T 30 MPH
1 VEHICLES IDLE DRIVE
IDLE NEUTRAL
2 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
FEDERAL SHORT TEST
FEDERAL THREE MODE 50 MPH
30 MPH
0 VEHICLES IDLE DRIVE
IDLE NEUTRAL
MEAN
1.64
1.07
180. 06
140.00
0.00
90.00
1.01
2.24
12.50
12.50
0.00
1005.00
2.48
0.50
215.00
315.00
272.50
222.50
2.76
1.60
40.00
85.00
0.00
75.00
2.18
1.50
140.00
126.67
275-00
106.67
1.45
0.73
112.50
60.00
0.00
1015.00
1.86
1.23
147.50
155.00
0.00
197.50
3.07
5.10
5.00
5.00
0.00
5.00
1.23
1.11
40.00
35.00
60.00
45.00
0.75
0 39
40.00
40.00
0.00
30.00
2.57
1.Q8
i4o!oo
135.00
110.00
2.25
45:E8
60.00
0.00
65.00
HC
S.D.
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.0
0.23
2.81
10.61
10.61
0.00
1407.1
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.0
0.28
0.08
50.00
14.43
0.00
20.8
0.97
0.63
53.03
42.43
0.00
1393.0
0.19
0.08
67.18
49.50
0.00
95.5
2.30
6.89
7.07
7.07
0.00
7.1
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.0
0.18
28! 28
0.00
7.1
MEAN
8.64
3.68
1.65
0.40
0.00
0.20
26.13
K75
0.00
2.95
66.0Q
3-14
6.25
8.35
8.65
48.17
1 .60
1.00
0.00
3-20
40.94
24.40
2.38
2.60
3-60
1.48
33.26
14.04
i'ii
o'.oo
4.84
32.31
21.47
3.40
2.15
0.00
2.25
20.78
45.58
0.12
0.05
0.00
0.06
17.97
7.04
.15
1.00
2.10
1.00
21.12
1 45
o!4o
0.00
1.00
49.08
3|-|g
3^10
3.50
2.80
23 -28
o!oo
1.37
CO
S.D.
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
17.07
2 '.33
0.00
4.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
10.39
7 23
0.55
1.40
0.00
0.30
19.39
11.97
3.04
1-91
0.00
6.73
27.60
18.18
2.83
1.77
0.00
0.49
13.36
58.71
0.11
0.00
0.00
0.06
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
9.46
4.29
0.64
0.74
0.00
1.03
C02
MEAN S.D.
360.5 o.o
298.9 0.0
591.2 146.6
472.5 124.3
453.0 o.o
453.0 o.o
411.9 0.0
338.9 0.0
318.6 22.0
267-3 20.3
358.9 45.7
295.5 32.7
278.1 12.6
227.1 13-7
567^5 16!9
682.1 0.0
548.8 0.0
452.4 0.0
375.6 0.0
387.2 0.0
326.6 0.0
411.7 35.0
358.1 62.8
MEAN
1-1I
ISlS^fi
583-59
0.00
77.16
0.67
0.47
311-25
122.26
0.00
63.30
0.91
0.61
389.06
166.68
87.18
65.64
0.98
0.76
737.16
337.87
0.00
36.07
1.88
1.42
1385.34
692.79
59.12
44.42
2.82
2.73
1219.43
725.81
0.00
44.59
1.15
0.99
1672.35
796.21
0.00
80.39
0.64
0.41
368.58
96.91
Q.OO
26.55
1.81
1 .22
522.16
94.19
35.07
32.07
0.81
0.57
788.35
296.91
0.10
61.13
1.63
O.Q8
2190.00
563.11
103.55
77.16
1.26
706.45
409.53
NOX
S.D.
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.17
0.13
225.87
94.96
0.00
56.92
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.22
0.36
141.53
139.01
0.00
3.52
1.81
1.41
527.92
99-78
0.00
24.80
0.46
0.30
1858.29
633.72
0.00
54.17
0.02
0.02
86.88
23-68
0.00
3-54
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.13
0.23
347.50
72.40
0.00
6.38
3-31
-------
TABLE 16 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF FEDERAL SHORT TEST.FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST & FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
19t5 YEAR MODEL VEHICLES
DENVER
MAKE
SAAB
NUMBER OF
VEHICLES
TEST
FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
HC
MEAN S.D.
CO
MEAN S.D.
C02
MEAN S.D.
MEAN
NOX
S.D.
1 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
FEDERAL SHORT TEST
FEDERAL THREE MODE 50 MPH
30 MPH
0 VEHICLES IDLE DRIVE
IDLE NEUTRAL
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.0
10.23
0.50
0.00
1.15
0.00
o'.oo
0.00
0.00
346.6
265.0
0.0
2.67
258l:J8
1144.77
0.00
82.17
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
SUBARU
1 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE 2.95
FEDERAL SHORT TEST 2.06
FEDERAL THREE MODE 50 MPH 145.00
30 MPH 135.00
0 VEHICLES IDLE DRIVE 0.00
IDLE NEUTRAL 290.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.0
24.83
15-50
0.65
1.90
0.00
1.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.0
0.0
2.26
1.80
2065.57
*tel
44.09
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
TOYOTA
3 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
FEDERAL SHORT TEST
FEDERAL THREE MODE 50 MPH
30 MPH
1 VEHICLES IDLE DRIVE
IDLE NEUTRAL
495.7
0.27
0.31
0.00
0.32
362.
319.
27.2
15.7
0.21
3-17
0.00
27.79
VW
4 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE 2.80 1.49
FEDERAL SHORT TEST 1.70 0.74
FEDERAL THREE MODE 50 MPH 135.00 54.01
30 MPH 153.75 79.10
1 VEHICLES IDLE DRIVE 110.00 0.00
IDLE NEUTRAL 138.00 96.3
18.67
1.03
0.00
2.43
311.9
257.6
0.87
0.62
700.52
438.90
0.00
20.39
VOLVO
1 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
FEDERAL SHORT TEST
FEDERAL THREE MODE 50 MPH
30 MPH
1 VEHICLES IDLE DRIVE
IDLE NEUTRAL
2.12
1.31
120.00
90.00
80.00
35.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
40-
33S
:T
0.0
0.0
1.00
0.57
696.21
.63
.10
34.07
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
3-32
-------
3.7 DENVER INSPECTION/MAINTENANCE EVALUATION TASK VEHICLE TEST RESULTS
3.7.1 Federal Test Procedure Results
FTP emission and fuel economy results for the Denver Inspection/
Maintenance Evaluation Task vehicles are summarized on the forty-two
pages comprising Table 17 which follows.
These data are further summarized below where HC, CO, C02 and NOX
emissions are presented in grams per mile. Any discrepancies which
may appear in these summarized data are due to mathematical rounding of
certain of the data.
3-33
-------
Summary of 1975 FTP Results
73 Passed 1975/1976 Model Phase I Vehicles
Condition
As-Rec'd
After Mtce.
Improvement
Improvement (%)
HC CO C02
NO,
1.72
1.45
0.26
15.4
36.18
30.57
5.61
15.5
554.4
567.2
-12.8
- 2.3
1.73
1.62
0.12
6.7
mpg
14.4
14.3
-0.07
-0.5
Summary of 1975 FTP Results
22
Condition-
As-Rec'd
After Mtce.
Improvement
Improvement (%)
Passed 1974 Model Phase I Vehicles
HC
5.44
4.24
1.20
22.1
CO
81.36
58.28
23.08
28.08
C02
527.1
554.6
-27.6
- 5.2
N0y
1.88
1.94
-0.05
-2.8
13.2
13.5
0.25
1.9
Summary of 1975 FTP Results
16 Passed 1973 Model Phase I Vehicles
Condition
As-Rec'd
After Mtce.
Improvement
Improvement (%)
HC CO C02
NO,
3.95
3.81
0.14
3.6
70.82
55.62
15.20
21.5
586.4
604.1
-17.7
- 3.0
2.04
2.15
-0.11
-5.2
12.5
12.6
0.12
0.9
Summary of 1975 FTP Results
14 Passed 1972 Model Phase I Vehicles
Condition
As-Rec'd
After Mtce.
Improvement
Improvement (%)
HC CO C02
NO
4.42
4.18
0.24
5.3
68.66
62.63
6.03
8.8
516.2
548.0
-31.5
- 6.1
2.96
2.82
0.14
4.8
"P8
13.9
13.5
-0.45
-3.2
3-34
-------
Summary of 1975 FTP Results
112 (All) 1975/1976 Model Phase I Vehicles
Condition
As-Rec'd
After Mtce.
Improvement
Improvement (%)
HC
2.30
1.70
0.60
26.1
CO
49.90
35.56
14.34
28.7
C02
MMBMM
535.0
559.3
-24.3
- 4.5
NO*
1.71
1.58
0.13
7.4
tnpg
14.3
14.3
0.00
0.0
Summary of 1975 FTP Results
30
Condition
As-Rec'd
After Mtce.
Improvement
Improvement (%)
(All) 1974 Model Phase I Vehicles
HC
5.15
4.12
1.04
20.1
CO
83.67
59.13
24.84
29.3
C02
503.5
533.2
-29.7
-5.9
NOX
1.85
1.87
-0.02
-1.0
13.6
13.9
0.26
1.9
Summary of 1975 FTP Results
27 (All) 1973 Model Phase I Vehicles
Condition
As-Rec'd
After Mtce.
Improvement
Improvement (%)
HC
CO
CO:
NO,
4.60
4.01
0.59
12.7
80.99
58.59
22.40
27.7
505.9
529.0
-23.1
- 4.6
2.06
2.11
-0.04
-2.1
mpg
13.7
14.0
0.30
2.2
Summary of 1975 FTP Results
Condition
As-Rec'd
After Mtce.
Improvement
Improvement (%)
25 (All) 1972 Model Phase I Vehicles
HC
6.53
4.16
2.37
36.3
CO
84.47
59.07
25.40
30.1
CO?
471.4
516.4
-44.9
- 9.5
NO*
2.68
2.61
0.07
2.5
14.2
14.3
0.06
0.4
3-35
-------
Summary of 1975 FTP Results
124 Failed 1975/1976 Model Phase I and II Vehicles
Condition HC_ CO COg NOX mpg
As-Rec'd 3. 54 78.35 506.9 1.52 13.8
After Mtce. 2.08 47.04 563.0 1.31 13.8
Improvement 1.46 31.31 -56.0 0.21 -0.05
Improvement (%) 41.3 40.0 -11.1 13.6 -0.3
Summary of 1975 FTP Results
31 Failed 1974 Model Phase I and II Vehicles
Condition' HC (X) C02 NOy mpg
As-Recfd 5.83 89.26 441.0 1.82 14.8
After Mtce. 4.62 63.18 480.9 1.64 14.9
Improvement 1.21 26.08 -39.9 0.18 0.12
Improvement (%) 20.7 29.2 - 9.0 9.7 0.8
L
Summary of 1975 FTP Results
53 Failed 1973 Model Phase I and II Vehicles
Condition HC £0 CQ2 NOX mpg
As-Rec'd 6.25 95.52 445.5 1.76 14.4
After Mtce. 4.98 65.15 482.9 1.75 14.8
Improvement 1.28 30.37 -37.4 0.02 0.34
Improvement (%) 20.4 31.8 - 8.4 1.1 2.4
Summary of 1975 FTP Results
Condition
As-Recfd
After Mtce.
Improvement
Improvement
50 Failed 1972
HC
7.01
5.06
1.95
(%) 27.9
Model Phase
CO
92.35
60.60
31.75
34.4
I and
CO?
419.9
465.3
-45.3
-10.8
II Vehicles
NOV
2.40
2.36
0.04
1.8
mpg
15.1
15.4
0.28
1.9
3-36
-------
TABLE 17
SUMMARY OF 1975 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON PHASE 1
PASSED VEHICLES BEFORE MAINTENANCE
DENVER
1975 & 1976 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 112 VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
NO. OF CYL.
2
4
6
8
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 - 250
251 - 350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799
2800 - 3799
3800 - 4799
4800 - 5799
2
5
20
27
19
2
17
11
43
19
11
19
24
17
19
27
10
HC
MEAN S.D.
0.88
2.37
1.53
1.61
1.99
3-07
1.82
1.44
1.69
1.95
1.44
1.91
1.51
2.03
1.45
1.78
1.52
0.2
1.4
0.7
0.7
0.9
2.3
0.6
0.8
0.8
0.9
0.8
0.9
0.7
0.9
0.9
0.8
0.5
CO
MEAN S.D.
10.35
43.00
37.94
37-48
33-40
20.78
34.62
25.64
40.21
33-16
25.64
43.25
37-80
32.29
27.51
42.75
41.54
1.8
22.1
20.8
21.3
15.5
13.4
15.3
13.7
21.8
15.4
13-7
23.4
20.6
13.5
18.8
23-0
14.9
C02
MEAN S.D.
585
556
636
582
424
844
357
494
634
409
494
557
695
410
502
610
746
.7
.7
.4
.5
.5
.3
.8
.3
.1
.0
.3
.1
.0
.6
.6
.3
.6
15.5
118.4
116.8
99.6
185.1
257.3
60.6
60.8
93-6
174.6
60.8
47.9
73-7
184.8
70.9
74.2
59.4
NOXC
MEAN S.D.
4.18
1.65
1.55
1.80
1.61
0.64
1.71
1.78
1.78
1.60
1.78
1.64
1.89
1.63
1.70
1.88
1.59
3.1
0.4
0.5
0.9
0.8
0.0
0.9
0.6
1.0
0.9
0.6
1.1
1.0
0.9
0.6
1.3
0.4
MPG
MEAN
14.7
14.0
12.7
13-7
18.4
10.0
21.2
16.5
12.6
19.0
16.5
14.1
11.7
19.0
16.1
13-0
10.9
ALL VEHICLES
73 1-72 0.8 36.18 19.8 554.4 152.2 1.73 0.9 14.4
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
3-37
-------
TABLE 17 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF 1975 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON PHASE 1
PASSED VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
1975 & 1976 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 112 VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
VEHICLE
MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL
IMPORTS
MOTORS
2
5
20
27
19
HC
MEAN S.D.
0.92
1.55
1.22
1.29
1.96
0.2
1.0
0.3
0.4
0.8
CO
MEAN S.D.
10.72
32.34
28.73
32.19
31.85
1.9
20.8
10.8
16.9
16.4
C02
MEAN S.D.
561.1
585.1
675.6
593.4
412.0
1.4
138.6
143-3
96.3
120.7
NOXC
MEAN S.D.
3.83
1.56
1.59
1.64
1.39
3.1
0.6
0.6
0.9
0.6
MPG
MEAN
15.3
13.8
12.2
13.7
19.0
NO. OF CYL.
2
4
6
8
2
17
11
43
2.36
1.83
1.27
1-31
0.8
0.9
0.8
0.3
15.90
32.58
25-33
31.80
2.6
16.9
16.5
14.6
611.8
369:0
498.3
661.2
36.7
62.8
66.1
105.9
0.70
1.46
1.64
1.72
0.0
0.6
0.6
1.0
13.8
20.8
16.4
12.4
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 -
251
250
350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA
1800 -
2800 -
3800 -
4800 -
WEIGHT
2799
3799
4799
5799
19
11
19
24
17
19
27
10
1.89
1.27
1.35
1.27
2.01
1.18
1.32
1.39
0.9
0.8
0.3.
0.4
0.9
0.6
0.4
0.3
30.83
25.33
30.94
32.49
30.99
23.27
32.39
38.85
16.8
16.5
14.7
14.9
16.0
15.3
13.8
15.2
394.5
498.3
572.8
731.2
390.6
511.0
648.1
756.1
97.2
66.1
44.1
85.9
102.1
67.1
104.7
54.0
1.38
1.64
1.51
1.88
1.40
1.58
1.82
1.51
0.6
0.6
1.0
1.0
0.6
0.7
1.2
0.5
19.8
16.4
14.2
11.3
19-9
16.1
12.6
10.8
ALL VEHICLES
73 1.45 0.7 30.57 15.4 567.2 152.9 1.62 0.9 14.3
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
3-38
-------
TABLE 17 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF 1975 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE EXHAUST EMISSION REDUCTIONS
ON PHASE 1 PASSED VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
1975 & 1976 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 112 VEHICLES
FUEL
NO. OF HC CO . C02 NOXC ECONOMY
VEH IMPR j&IMPR IMPR $IMPR IMPR $IMPR IMPR $IMPR IMPR &DMPR
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS 2 -0.04 -4.6 -0.37 -3-6 24.6 4.2 0.35 8.4 0.60 4.1
CHRYSLER 5 0.82 34.6 10.66 24.8 -28.4 -5.1 0.09 5.6 -0.20 -1.4
FORD 20 0.30 19-9 9-22 24.3 -39.2 -6.2 -0.05 -3-2 -0.42 -3-3
GENERAL MOTORS 27 0.32 19-9 5.29 14.1 -10.9 -1.9 0.16 8.8-0.03 -0.2
IMPORTS 19 0.03 1.4 1.55 4.7 12.5 2.9 0.21 13-3 0.59 3.2
NO. OF CYL.
2 2 0.71 23.2 4.88 23.5 232.5 27.5 -0.05 -8.1 3-77 37.6
4 17-0.01 -0.8 2.03 5-9 -11.2 -3.1 0.26 15.1-0.40 -1.9
6 11 0.17 11.5 0.31 1.2 -4.0 -0.8 0.14 8.1 -0.09 -0.6
8 43 0.38 22.4 8.41 20.9 -27.1 -4.3 0.06 3.4-0.22 -1.8
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151 19 0.06 3.2 2.33 7.0 14.4 3.5 0.23 14.1 0.77 4.1
151 - 250 11 0.17 11.5 0.31 1.2 -4.0 -0.8 0.14 8.1 -0.09 -0.6
251 - 350 19 0.55 29.0 12.32 28.5 -15.7 -2.8 0.13 7.8 0.12 0.9
MORE THAN 350 24 0.24 15-9 5.31 14.1 -36.1 -5.2 0.01 0.4-0.40 -3.4
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799 17 0.02 0.9 1.30 4.0 19.9 4.9 0.23 14.0 0.94 4.9
2800 - 3799 19 o.27 18.9 4.24 15.4 -8.4 -1.7 0.12 7.2 -0.02 -0.2
3800 - 4799 27 0.46 25.9 10.36 24.2 -37-7 -6.2 0.06 3-0 -0.37 -2.8
4800 - 5799 10 0.13 8.6 2.69 6.5 -9.5 -1.3 0.08 5.0-0.06 -0.6
ALL VEHICLES 73 0.26 15.4 5.61 15.5 -12.8 -2.3 0.12 6.7-0.07 -0.5
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON' '
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
3-39
-------
TABLE 17 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF 1975 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON PHASE 1
PASSED VEHICLES BEFORE MAINTENANCE
DENVER
1974 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 30 VEHICLES
NO. OF HC
VEH MEAN S.D.
VEHICLE
MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL
IMPORTS
•
MOTORS
1
2
5
11
3
5.36
8.59
4.45
5.35
5.35
0.0
4.5
0.7
3.8
1.7
CO
MEAN S.D.
64.73
118.72
73.40
84.47
63.86
0.0
98.1
27.3
33-6
4.8
C02
MEAN S.D.
475.9
468.6
512.5
603.3
327.9
0.0
79.8
134.7
75.6
143.1
NOXC
MEAN S.D.
2.93
1.64
2.03
1.94
1.26
0.0
1.4
0.7
1.0
0.6
MPG
MEAN
14.9
13.0
13.8
11.8
19.9
NO. OF CYL.
2
4
6
8
1
3
1
17
7.29
4.37
3.00
5.66
0.0
0.3
0.0
3.4
68.27
60.67
54.02
87.39
0.0
3-3
0.0
39.9
493.2
262.4
456.3
579-9
0.0
29.7
0.0
81.0
0.61
1.61
1.58
2.03
0.0
0.2
0.0
1.0
14.2
23.9
16.1
12.1
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151
251
250
350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA
1800 -
2800 -
3800 -
4800 -
WEIGHT
2799
3799
4799
5799
4
1
12
5
4
3
12
3
5.10
3-00
6.33
4.08
5.10
4.46
6.05
4.44
1.5
0.0
3.9
0.5
1.5
1.3
4.0
0.8
62.57
54.02
99.89
57.39
62.57
80.15
90.75
70.05
4.7
0.0
41.0
12.6
4.7
36.4
42.0
41.2
320.1
456.3
549.2
653-7
320.1
473.1
571.2
680.5
117.9
0.0
68.9
59.6
117.9
15.6
68.1
40.8
1.36
1.58
1.73
2.74
1.36
1.85
1.80
2.96
0.5
0.0
0.9
0.8
0.5
1.0
0.8
1.1
20.1
16.1
12.2
11.7
20.4
14.15
12.1
11.0
ALL VEHICLES
22 5.44 3.1 81.36 36.7 527.1 132.8 1.88 0.9 13.2
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
3-40
-------
TABLE 17 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF 1975 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON PHASE 1
PASSED VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
1974 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 30 VEHICLES
NO. OF HC
VEH MEAN S.D.
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
NO. OF CYL.
2
4
6
8
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 - 250
251 - 350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799
2800 - 3799
3800 - 4799
4800 - 5799
ALL VEHICLES
1
2
5
11
3
1
3
1
17
4
1
12
5
4
3
12
3
22
4
4
4
3
5
7
4
2
4
5
2
4
3
5
4
3
4
4
.85
.75
.07
.84
.44
.46
.19
.89
.14
.00
.89
.28
.78
.00
.16
.99
.28
.24
0.0
0.2
0.8
1.1
1.8
0.0
0.5
0.0
0.9
1.7
0.0
1.1
0.5
1.7
1.1
1.0
0.9
1.1
CO
MEAN S.D.
45.99
67.66
63.89
55.93
55.39
65.58
48.22
46.77
60.31
52.56
46.77
64.65
49.88
52.56
58.70
61.87
51.16
58.28
0.0
22.6
15.4
15.3
10.5
0.0
6.8
0.0
15.7
10.3
0.0
14.3
15.1
10.3
21.4
12.3
25.0
14.8
C02
MEAN S.D.
527.5
533.2
522.1
632.4
347.1
517.2
271.5
445.1
613-2
332.9
445.1
584.6
682.0
332.9
483.0
610.9
696.8
554.6
0.0
36.1
147.4
79.4
147.3
0.0
16.6
0.0
72.8
123.6
0.0
62.6
45.1
123.6
41.6
53.4
56.0
137.6
NOXC
MEAN S.D.
3-36
1.66
1.91
2.03
1.35
0.57
1.85
1.53
2.06
1.53
1.53
1.83
2.59
1.53
2.15
1.63
3.50
1.94
0.0
0.6
0.6
1.1
0.7
0.0
0.2
0.0
1.0
0.7
0.0
0.8
1.2
0.7
1.0
0.6
0.7
0.9
MPG
MEAN
14.4
13-6
14.0
12.1
19.7
13.8
24.6
16.8
12.3
20.6
16.8
12.7
11.5
20.6
15.1
12.3
11.2
13.5
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES* PER GALLON
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
3-41
-------
TABLE 17 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF 1975 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE EXHAUST EMISSION REDUCTIONS
ON PHASE 1 PASSED VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
1974 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 30 VEHICLES
FUEL
NO. OF HC CO C02 NOXC ECONOMY
VEH IMPR 5HMPR IMPR *IMPR IMPR $IMPR IMPR *IMPR IMPR
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS 1 0.52 9.7 18.74 28.9 -51.5 -10.8 -0.43 -14.7 -0.50 -3.3
CHRYSLER 2 3.84 44.7 51.06 43.0 -64.6 -13.8 -0.02 -1.2 0.55 4.3
FORD ' 5 0.38 8.4 9.51 13.0- -9.6 -1.9 0.13 6.2 0.14 1.0
GENERAL MOTORS 11 1.52 28.3 28.54 33.8 -29.1 -4.8-0.10 -4.9 0.33 2.8
IMPORTS 3 -0.09 -1.7 8.47 13-3 -19.1 -5.8-0.09 -7.5 -0.27 -1.1
NO. OF CYL.
2 1 -0.17 -2.4 2.69 3-9 -24.0 -4.9 0.04 6.9 -0.45 -3-2
4 3 0.18 4.2 12.46 20.5 -9.1 -3.5 -0.24 -14.9 0.73 3.1
6 1 0.11 3.7 7.25 13.4 11.2 2.5 0.05 3-1 0.70 4.4
8 17 1.53 27.0 27.08 31.0 -33-3 -5.7 -0.03 -1.6 0.24 2.0
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151 4 0.09 1.8 10.01 16.0 -12.8 -4.0-0.17 -12.4 0.15 0.7
151 - 250 1 0.11 3-7 7.25 13-4 11.2 2.5 0.05 3-1 0.70 4.1
251 - 350 12 2.04 32.3 35.24 35.3 -35.4 -6.4 -0.11 -6.3 0.46 3-8
MORE THAN 350 5 0.30 7.3 7.51 13-1 -28.3 -4.3 0.15 5.6 -0..24 -2.0
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799 4 0.09 1.8 10.01 16.0 -12.8 -4.0 -0.17 -12.4 0.15 0.7
2800 - 3799 3 0.30 6.6 21.45 26.8 -9.9 -2.1 -0.31 -16.5 0.61 J4.2
3800 - 4799 12 2.06 34.1 28.88 31.8 -39.7 -7.0 0.17 9.4 0.21 1.7
4800 - 5799 3 0.16 3.5 18.89 27.0 -16.3 -2.4 -0.54 -18.2 0.19 1.8
ALL VEHICLES 22 1.20 22.1 23.08 28.4 -27.6 -5.2-0.05 -2.8 0.25 1.9
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
3-42
-------
TABLE 17 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF 1975 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON PHASE 1
PASSED VEHICLES BEFORE MAINTENANCE
DENVER
1973 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 27 VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
HC
MEAN S.D.
CO
MEAN S.D.
C02
MEAN S.D.
NOXC
MEAN S.D.
MPG
MEAN
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
0
1
2
11
2
3.30
4.84
3-91
3.60
0.0
0.1
1.0
1.3
43.49
90.57
72.09
57.70
0.0
18.0
18.0
13.0
387.2
594.7
644.9
356.0
0.0
6.6
93.3
115.6
4.68
1.52
1.92
1.94
0.0
0.8
0.9
0.2
19.0
11.8
11.5
19.4
NO. OF CYL.
2
4
6
8
0
2
1
13
3-60
3.30
4.05
1-3
0.0
1.0
57.70
43.49
74.94
13-0
0.0
18.6
356.0
387.2
637.2
115.6
0.0
87.3
1.94
4.68
1.86
0.2
0.0
0.9
19.4
19.0
11.6
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN
151 -
251 -
MORE THAN
151
250
350
350
2
1
6
7
3.60
3-30
4.23
3.90
1.3
0.0
1.1
0.9
57.70
43.49
73.56
76.11
13-0
0.0
8.6
25.0
356.0
387.2
582.2
684.3
115.6
0.0
53-3
85.1
1.94
4.68
1.74
1.96
0.2
0.0
0.7
1.0
19.4
19.0
12.5
10.9
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 -
2800 -
3800 -
4800 -
2799
3799
4799
5799
1
3
10
2
4.55
3.13
4.15
3.89
0.0
0.4
1.1
0.6
66.85
58.06
70.41
93-95
0.0
21.0
17.2
22.2
274.3
454.0
626.3
741.4
0.0
76.2
79.6
38.4
1.82
2.68
1.99
1.45
0.0
1.8
0.9
0.2
22.5
16.0
11.8
9.8
ALL VEHICLES
16 3-95 1.0 70.82 19.4 586.4 137.6 2.04 1.0 12.5
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE
« -v
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
3-43
-------
TABLE 17 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF 1975 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON PHASE 1
PASSED VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
1973 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 27 VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
HC
MEAN S.D.
CO
MEAN S.D.
C02
MEAN S.D.
NOXC
MEAN S.D.
MPG
MEAN
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
0
1
2
11
2
3.23
4.25
3.84
3-47
0.0
0.4
1.3
1.5
52.85
68.45
55.10
47.05
0.0
8.6
16.9
14.6
403.8
664.9
659-4
339.6
0.0
78.4
78.5
109.5
3.31
2.16
2.11
1.78
0.0
1.0
1.3
0.1
17.9
11-3
11.7
20.9
NO. OF CYL.
2
4
6
8
0
2
1
13
3-47
3-23
3-90
1.5
0.0
1.2
47.05
52.85
57.15
14.6
0.0
16.4
339-6
403.8
660.2
109.5
0.0
75.2
1.78
i
3.31
2.12
0.1
0.0
1.2
20.9
17.9
11.6
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN
151
251 -
MORE THAN
151
250
350
350
2
1
6
7
3.47
3.23
3.95
3.86
1.5
0.0
1.3
1.2
47.05
52.85
56.32
57.87
14.6
0.0
19.9
14.3
339-6
403.8
600.2
711.7
109.5
0.0
35.0
59.8
1.78
3.31
1.73
2.45
0.1
0.0
0.6
1.5
20.9
17-9
12.7
10.9
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 -
2800 -
3800 -
4800 -
2799
3799
4799
5799
1
3
10
2
4.52
2.80
4.14
3.30
0.0
0.4
1.3
0.1
57.37
51.66
54.74
65.10
0.0
14.4
18.1
3.2
262.2
466.9
649.7
753.3
0.0
98.1
67.1
48.7
1.85
2.07
2.25
1.92
0.0
1.1
1.3
0.1
24.2
15-9
11.9
10.2
ALL VEHICLES
16 3-81 1.2 55.62 15.5 604.1 141.6 2.15 1.1 12.6
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
3-44
-------
TABLE 17 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF 1975 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE EXHAUST EMISSION REDUCTIONS
ON PHASE 1 PASSED VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
1973 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 27 VEHICLES
FUEL
NO OF HC CO C02 NOXC ECONOMY
VEH IMPR £EMPR IMPR JIMPR IMPR $IMPR IMPR *IMPR IMPR
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS 0
CHRYSLER 1 0.07 2.2 -9-36 -21.5 -16.6 -4.3 1.37 29.2 -1.19 -6.2
FORD 2 0.59 12.2 22.12 24.4 -70.2 -11.8 -0.64 -42.0 -0.50 -4.3
GENERAL MOTORS 11 0.07 1.8 16.99 23.6 -14.5 -2.2-0.19 -10.0 0.19 1.6
IMPORTS 2 0.13 3.6 10.65 18.5 16.4 4.6 0.15 8.0 1.53 7-9
NO. OF CYL.
2 0
4 2 0.13 3-6 10.65 18.5 16.4 4.6 0.15 8.0 1.53 7-9
6 1 0.07 2.2 -9.36 -21.5 -16.6 -4.3 1-37 29.2 -1.19 -6.2
8 13 0.15 3-7 17.78 23.7 -23.1 -3.6 -0.26 -14.0 0.08 0.7
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151 2 0.13 3-6 10.65 18.5 16.4 4.6 0.15 8.0 1.53 7-9
151 - 250 1 0.07 2.2 -9-36 -21.5 -16.6 -4.3 1.37 29.2 -1.19 -6.2
251 - 350 6 0.28 6.7 17-25 23-4 -18.0 -3-1 0.02 0.9 0.18 1.4
MORE THAN 350 7 0.04 1.0 18.24 24.0 -27.4 -4.0-0.50 -25.5 0.02 0.2
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799 1 0.03 0.6 9.48 14.2 12.1 4.4-0.03 -1.6 1.67 7.4
2800 - 3799 3 0.33 10.6 6.40 11.0 -12.9 -2.8 0.61 22.8 -0.05 -0.3
3800 - 4799 10 0.01 0.3 15.67 22.3 -23-3 -3-7 -0.26 -12.9 0.02 0.2
4800 - 5799 2 0.59 15.1 28.85 30.7 -11.9 -1.6 -0.47 -32.4 0.40 4.1
ALL VEHICLES 16 0.14 3.6 15.20 21.5 -17-7 -3.0-0.11 -5.2 0.12 0.9
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
3-45
-------
TABLE 17 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF 1975 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON PHASE 1
PASSED VEHICLES BEFORE MAINTENANCE
DENVER
1972 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 25 VEHICLES
NO. OF HC
VEH MEAN S.D.
VEHICLE
MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL
IMPORTS
MOTORS
0
1
5
6
2
3.95
4.29
4.81
3.79
0.0
0.6
1.1
0.0
CO
MEAN S.D.
39.72
59.39
88.87
45.68
Q.O
16.3
24.8
2.8
C02
MEAN S.D.
494.8
562.3
558.8
286.4
0.0
114.5
107.5
25.2
NOXC
MEAN S.D.
3-74
3.90
2.31
2.20
0.0
0.7
1.7
1.0
MPG
MEAN
15.6
13-3
12.1
24.0
NO. OF CYL.
2
4
6
8
0
3
1
10
3.95
3.87
4:61
0.3
0.0
0.9
52.44
56,54
74.74
11.9
0.0
28.6
320.9
363.0
590.6
62.3
0.0
64.4
1.88
3.65
3.22
0.9
0.0
1.5
21.3
19.1
12.3
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 -
251 -
250
350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA
1800 -
2800 -
3800 -
4800 -
WEIGHT
2799
3799
4799
5799
3
1
4
6
4
4
5
1
3.95
3.87
4.64
4.59
3-93
4.18
5.05
4.13
0.3
0.0
1.2
0.8
0.2
0.6
1.1
0.0
52.44
56.54
71.64
76.80
53.47
63.62
73.07
127.55
11.9
0.0
27.5
31.6
9.9
20.0
26.7
0.0
320.9
363.0
529.4
631.4
331.4
535.3
612.3
703.3
62.3
0.0
31.1
43.4
55.0
40.5
35.6
0.0
1.88
3.65
2.28
3.84
2.33
2.66
3.99
1.55
0.9
0.0
1.0
1.4
1.1
1.2
1.4
0.0
21.3
19.1
13-5
11.6
20.7
13-7
11.9
9.7
ALL VEHICLES
14 4.42 0.8 68.66 26.2 516.5 135.4 2,96 1.4 13-9
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
3-46
-------
TABLE 17 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF 1975 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON PHASE 1
PASSED VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
1972 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 25 VEHICLES
NO. OF HC
VEH MEAN S.D.
CO
MEAN S.D.
C02
MEAN S.D.
NOXC
MEAN S.D.
MPG
MEAN
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
0
1
5
6
2
4.18
3-62
4.69
4.06
0.0
0,6
0.9
0.3
53-86
49.96
79.57
47.91
0.0
13.4
46.0
11.1
493.2
610.9
595.8
274.9
0.0
145.0
132.8
12.6
3.47
3.51
2.38
2.11
0.0
1.0
1.8'
1.2
15.0
12.7
12.1
24.4
NO. OF CYL.
2
4
6
8
0
3
1
10
4.56
3.51
4:14
0.9
0.0
0.8
57.87
48.19
65.51
19.0
0.0
38.6
310.3
373.9
636.8
61.9
0.0
89.3
1.70
4.56
2.98
1.1
0.0
1.3
21.4
19.3
11.8
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN
151 -
251 -
MORE THAN
151
250
350
350
3
1
4
6
4.56
3.51
4.35
3.99
0.9
0.0
1.0
0,7
57.87
48.19
57.84
70.62
19.0
0.0
11.7
50.2
310.3
373-9
559.3
688.4
61.9
0.0
49.4
70.0
1.70
4.56
2.41
3.37
1.1
0.0
0.8
1.6
21.4
19.3
13.4
10.9
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 -
2800 -
3800 -
4800 -
2799
3799
4799
5799
4
4
5
1
4.30
4.03
4.11
4.72
0.9
0.5
1.1
0.0
55.45
51.68
55.66
170.09
16.2
3.4
17.1
0.0
326.2
553.8
674.0
782.3
59.7
43.4
51.2
0.0
2.42
2.51
3.68
1.38
1.7
0.8
1.5
0.0
20.8
13-7
11.5
8.3
ALL VEHICLES 14 4.18 0.8 62.63 33.4 548.0 166.0 2.82 1.4 13.5
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES'PER GALLON
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
3-47
-------
TABLE 17 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF 1975 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE EXHAUST EMISSION REDUCTIONS
ON PHASE 1 PASSED VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
1972 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 25 VEHICLES
FUEL
NO. OF HC CO C02 NOXC ECONOMY
VEH IMPR $IMPR IMPR JIMPR IMPR 5&IMPR IMPR *IMPR IMPR JIMPR
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS 0
CHRYSLER 1 -0.23 -5.8 -14.14 -35.6 1.7 0.3 0.27 7.2 -0.56 -3.6
FORD 5 0.67 15.7 9-44 15.9 -48.7 -8.7 0.39 10.0 -0.60 -4.5
GENERAL MOTORS 6 0.12 2.5 9.30 10.5 -37.0 -6.6-0.07 -3.0 -0.37 -3-0
IMPORTS 2 -0.28 -7.4 -2.22 -4.9 11.5 4.0 0.09 4.2 0.47 2.0
NO. OF CYL.
2 0
4 3 -0.61 -15.5 -5.43 -10.4 10.6 3-3 0.18 9.7 0.01 0.0
6 1 0.37 9.5 8.36 14.8 -10.9 -3.0 -0.91 -24.9 0.14 0.7
8 10 0.48' 10.3 9.23 12.3 -46.2 -7.8 0.23 7-3 -0.49 -4.0
*t .
DISPLACEMENT ^
LESS THAN 151 3 -0.61 -15.5 -5.43 -10.4 10.6 3.3 0.18 9.7 0.01 0.0
151 - 250 1 0.37 9.5 8.36 14.8 -10.9 -3.0 -0.91 -24.9 0.14 0.7
251 - 350 4 0.29 6.3 13-81 19-3 -29-9 -5.6 -0.12 -5.3 -0.15 -1-1
MORE THAN 350 6 0.60 13.1 6.18 8.0 -57.0 -9.0 0.47 12.3 -0.65 -5.6
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799 4 -0.37 -9.4 -1.98 -3.7 5.2 1.6 -0.09 -3-9 0.05 0.2
2800 - 3799 4 0.16 3.8 11.94 18.8 -18.5 -3.5 0.15 5.6 0.02 0.1
3800 -.4799 5 0.94 18.7 17.42 23.8-61.7 -10.1 0.32 7.9 -0.48 -4.0
4800 - 5799 1 -0.59-14.3-42.55-33.4 -79.1 -11.2 0.16 10.6 -1.34-13-9
ALL VEHICLES 14 0.24 5-3 6.03 8.8 -31.5 -6.1 0.14 4.8 -0.45 -3-2
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
3-48
-------
TABLE 17 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF 1975 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON ALL PHASE 1
VEHICLES BEFORE MAINTENANCE
DENVER
1975 & 1976 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 112 VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
HC
MEAN S.D.
CO
MEAN S.D.
C02
MEAN S.D.
NOXC
MEAN S.D.
MPG
MEAN
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
6
15
25
40
26
1.91
3.32
2.11
2.14
2.24
0.8
1.2
2.1
1.2
0.9
31.90
74.68
51.91
51.01
36.11
22.2
33.2
56.8
32.4
16.1
482.0
557.6
639.8
552.8
406.2
89.6
92.8
108.8
114.3
163.8
3.24
1.76
1.57
1.59
1.63
1.7
0.4
0.5
0.8
0.8
16.5
12.9
12.2
13.9
18.9
NO. OF CYL.
2
4
6
8
2
27
17
66
3.07
2.21
1.85
2:43
2.3
D.9
0.9
1.7
20.78
39.96
34.53
58.81
13.4
20.3
19.7
44.4
844.3
350.7
469.5
617.9
257.3
56.7
64.9
89.1
0.64
1.64
1.99
1.69
0.0
0.8
0.8
0.9
10.0
21.1
16.8
12.4
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN
151 -
251 -
MORE THAN
151
250
350
350
29
15
29
39
2.27
1.75
2.28
2.55
1.0
0.9
1.0
2.0
38.64
32.23
51.16
64.14
20.3
18.5
25.1
53.5
384.8
469.7
544.2
665.1
146.8
68.5
51.3
80.2
1.57
1.89
1.66
1.76
0.8
0.7
1.0
0.9
19.6
16.9
14.0
11.5
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 -
2800 -
3800 -
4800 -
2799
3799
4799
5799
27
26
43
16
2.36
1.77
2.53
2.45
1.0
1.0
1.8
1.5
39.06
33.97
61.11
63.94
20.5
23.1
47.2
39.1
386.7
485.9
597.3
697.9
152.7
78.3
77.8
84.6
1.59
1.83
1.77
1.53
0.8
0.8
1.1
0.4
19.5
16.3
12.7
11.0
ALL VEHICLES 112 2.30
1.4 49.90 37.9 535.0 146.1
1.71 0.9 14.3
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
3-49
-------
TABLE 17 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF 1975 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON ALL PHASE 1
VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
1975 & 1976 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 112 VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
VEHICLE
MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL
IMPORTS
MOTORS
6
15
25
40
26
HC
MEAN S.D.
1.88
1.93
1.28
1.56
2.16
0.9
1.2
0.4
0.8
1.0
CO
MEAN S.D.
36.24
43.54
29.50
38.07
32.74
27.9
24.5
12.8
24.0
16.9
C02
MEAN S.D.
495.3
611.1
687.9
571.9
401.2
55.0
109.9
134.6
109.7
113.8
NOXC
MEAN S.D.
2.58
1.57
1.58
1.51
1.47
1.7
0.6
0.5
0.8
0.6
MPG
MEAN
15.9
12.9
12.0
13.9
19.3
NO. OF CYL.
2
4
6
8
2
27
17
66
2.36
2.06
1.48
1:59
0.8
1.0
0.9
0.8
15.90
34.32
29.72
38.16
2.6
16.3
20.6
22.4
611.8
362.3
489.2
656.3
36.7
59.6
57.3
99.4
0.70
1.46
1.66
1.63
0.0
0.6
0.6
0.9
13.8
21.0
16.4
12.3
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151
251 -
250
350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA
1800 -
2800 -
3800 -
4800 -
WEIGHT
2799
3799
4799
5799
29
15
29
39
27
26
43
16
2.08
1.35
1.54
1.67
2.17
1.30
1.64
1.74
1.0
0.8
0.5
1.0
1.0
0.6
0.8
1.1
33.05
26.03
35.21
41.34
32.83
24.91
39.34
47.29
16.4
15.5
20.4
24.4
16.2
15.2
19.0
30.8
379.5
490.1
567.3
713.6
381.7
502.4
643.9
724.0
86.5
61.2
45.0
87.2
93.5
70.0
101.1
78.1
1.41
1.60
1.58
1.70
1.43
1.59
1.73
1.42
0.6
0.6
0.9
0.9
0.6
0.6
1.0
0.5
20.3
16.6
14.1
11.3
20.2
16.3
12.5
11.0
ALL VEHICLES
112 1.70 0.9 35.56 20.8 559.3 151.5 1.58 0.8 14.3
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
3-50
-------
TABLE 17 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF 1975 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE EXHAUST EMISSION REDUCTIONS
ON ALL PHASE 1 VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
1975 & 1976 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 112 VEHICLES
FUEL
NO. OF HC CO C02 NOXC ECONOMY
VEH IMPR JIMPR IMPR jtlMPR IMPR $IMPR IMPR $IMPR IMPR $IMPR
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS 6 0.03 1.6 -4.34 -13.6 -13-3 -2.8 0.66 20.4 -0.59 -3.6
CHRYSLER 15 1.40 42.0 31.14 41.7 -53.6 -9.6 0.20 11.1 -0.00 -0.0
FORD 25 0.83 39.5 22.41 43.2 -48.1 -7.5 -0.01 -0.4 -0.17 -1.4
GENERAL MOTORS 40 0.58 27.1 12.94 25.4 -19.1 -3.5 0.08 5.1 0.07 0.5
IMPORTS 26 0.08 3-7 3-37 9.3 5.1 1.2 0.16 9.8 0.44 2.3
NO. OF CYL.
2 2 0.71 23.2 4.88 23.5 232.5 27.5 -0.05 -8.1 3-77 37-6
4 27 0.15 6.7 5.64 14.1 -11.6 -3.3 0.18 10.8 -0.11 -0.5
6 17 0.36 19.7 4.82 13,9 -19.7 -4.2 0.33 16.6 -0.34 -2.0
8 66 0.841 34.7 20.65 35.1 -38.4 -6.2 0.06 3-4 -0.06 -0.5
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151 29 0.19 8.3 5.59 14.5 5.2 1.4 0.16 10.2 0.65 3-3
151 - 250 15 0.40 22.8 6.20 19.2 -20.4 -4.4 0.29 15.6 -0.30 -1.8
251 - 350 29 0.74 32.6 15.95 31.2 -23.2 -4.3 0.09 5.2 0.10 0.7
MORE THAN 350 39 0.88 34.5 22.79 35.5 -48.5 -7.3 0.06 3.6 -0.14 -1.3
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799 27 0.19 8.0 6.22 15.9 5.0 1.3 0.16 10.2 0.68 3-5
2800 - 3799 26 0.48 27.0 9.06 26.7 -16.6 -3.4 0.24 13.3 -0.02 -0.2
3800 - 4799 43 0.89 35.4 21.78 35.6 -46.6 -7.8 0.04 2.2 -0.17 -1.3
WOO - 5799 16 0.71 28.8 16.65 26.0 -26.1 -3.7 0.11 7.1 0.03 0.3
ALL VEHICLES 112 0.60 26.1 14.34 28.7 -24.3 -4.5 0.13 7.4 0.00 0.0
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
3-51
-------
TABLE 17 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF 1975 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON ALL PHASE 1
VEHICLES BEFORE MAINTENANCE
DENVER
1974 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 30 VEHICLES
NO. OF HC
VEH MEAN S.D.
VEHICLE
MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL
IMPORTS
MOTORS
1
4
7
13
5
5.36
6.18
4.69
5.19
4.86
0.0
3.8
1.2
3.5
1.4
CO
MEAN S.D.
64.73
94.72
85.48
89.18
61.77
0.0
63.3
38.7
39-0
6.8
C02
MEAN S.D.
475.9
428.7
513,4
590.9
328.0
0.0
67.7
131.9
106.1
101.4
NOXC
MEAN S.D.
2.93
1.85
1.96 ...
1.94
1.22
0.0
1.0
0.6
0.9
0.5
MPG
MEAN
14.9
14.9
13.4
11.9
20.1
NO. OF CYL.
2
4
6
8
1
6
4
19
7.29
4.04
3.56
5.73
0.0
0.6
0.4
3.2
68.27
60.44
67.39
95.25
0.0
5.4
10.6
44.4
493.2
297.2
405.9
589.8
0.0
43.1
38.2
82.6
0.61
1.62
1.75
2.01
0.0
0.6
0.6
0.9
14.2
21.9
17.0
11.7
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 -
251 -
250
350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA
1800 -
2800 -
3800 -
4800 -
WEIGHT
2799
3799
4799
5799
7
4
12
7
7
6
12
5
4.50
3.56
6.33
4.71
4.50
4.10
6.05
5.18
1.4
0.4
3.9
1.2
1.4
0.9
4.0
1.2
61.55
67.39
99.89
87.29
•
61.55
76.00
90.75
106.84
5.7
10.6
41.0
52.2
5.7
23.9
42.0
58.3
325.2
405.9
549.2
659.4
325.2
431.1
571.2
677.7
83.9
38.2
68.9
53.0
83.9
49.2
68.1
36.9
1.48
1.75
1.73
2.49
1.48
1.83
1.80
2.52
0.7
0.6
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.8
0.8
1.0
20.3
17.0
12.2
10.9
20.3
15.7
12.1
10.3
ALL VEHICLES
30 5.15 2.7 83.67 38.5 503.5 140.4 1.85 0.8 13-6
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
3-52
-------
TABLE 17 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF 1975 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON ALL PHASE 1
VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
1974 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 30 VEHICLES
NO. OF HC
VEH MEAN S.D.
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
NO. OF CYL.
2
4
6
8
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 - 250
251 - 350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799
2800 - 3799
3800 - 4799
4800 - 5799
1
4
7
13
5
1
6
4
19
7
4
12
7
7
6
12
5
4.85
4.03
4.18
3.78
4.85
7.46
3.89
3-32
4:18
4.40
3.32
4.28
4.01
4.40
3.81
3.99
4.40
0.0
0.8
0.8
1.0
1.5
0.0
0.6
0.4
0.9
1.5
0.4
1.1
0.7
1.5
0.8
1.0
0.8
CO
MEAN S.D.
45.99
62.63
67.05
56.65
54.32
65.58
50.30
58.47
61.72
52.48
58.47
64.65
56.68
52.48
60.54
61.87
60.17
0.0
18.9
13.8
14.5
13.7
0.0
11.3
16.2
15.4
11.9
16.2
14.3
17.1
11.9
17.5
12.3
21.8
C02
MEAN S.D.
527.
489.
532.
619.
344.
517.
304.
444.
624.
335.
444.
584.
693.
335.
463.
610.
707.
5
7
9
6
9
2
9
7
8
2
7
6
7
2
8
9
3
0.0
54.4
139.8
118.9
104.7
0.0
39.2
4.7
78.3
87.9
4.7
62.6
49.1
87.9
33.9
53.4
52.5
NOXC
MEAN S.D.
3.36
1.71
1.81
2.04
1.34
0.57
1.77
1.49
2.05
1.60
1.49
1.83
2.41
1.60
1.82
1.63
2.88
0.0
0.5
0.6
1.0
0.6
0.0
0.5
0.6
0.9
0.7
0.6
0.8
1.1
0.7
0.9
0.6
1.0
MPG
MEAN
14.4
14.8
13.6
12.3
19.9
13.8
22.4
16.2
12.1
20.6
16.2
12.7
11.2
20.6
15.5
12.3
10.9
ALL VEHICLES 30 4.12 1.0 59.13 14.8 533.2 146.4 1.87 0.9 13-9
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
3-53
-------
TABLE 17 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF 1975 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE EXHAUST EMISSION REDUCTIONS
ON ALL PHASE 1 VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
1974 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 30 VEHICLES
FUEL
NO. OF HC CO C02 NOXC ECONOMY
VEH IMPR *IMPR IMPR *IMPR IMPR fclMPR IMPR *IMPR IMPR *IMPR
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS 1 0.52 9.7 18.74 28.9 -51.5 -10.8 -0.43 -14.7 -0.50 -3.3
CHRYSLER 4 2.15 34.8 32.09 33-9 -61.1 -14.2 0.14 7.5 -0.09 -0.6
FORD .7 0.51 10.8 18.43 21.6 -19.4, -3.8 0.16 8.1 0.23 1.7
GENERAL MOTORS 13 1.41 27.2 32.53 36.5 -28.8 -4,9-0.10 -4.9 0.44 3.7
IMPORTS 5 0.01 0.2 7.46 12.1 -16.8 -5.1 -0.11 -9.1 -0.23 -1.1
NO. OF CYL.
2 1 -0.17 -2.4 2.69 3-9 -24.0 -4.9 0.04 6.9 -0.45 -3.2
4 6 0.15 3.6 10.14 16.8 -7.7 -2.6 -0.15 -9.2 0.48 2.2
6 4 0.24 6.6 8.92 13-2 -38.8 -9.6 0.25 14.6 -0.74 -4.1
8 19 1.55 27.0 33.53 35.2 -35.0 -5.9 -0.04 -1.9 0.36 3.1
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151 7 0.10 2.2 9.07 14.7 -10.0 -3.1 -0.12 -8.3 0.22 1.1
151 - 250 4 0.24 6.6 8.92 13-2 -38.8 -9.6 0.25 14.6 -0.74 -4.4
251 - 350 12 2.04 32.3 35.24 35.3 -35.4 -6.4 -0.11 -6.3 0.46 3-8
MORE THAN 350 7 0.70 14.9 30.60 35.1 -34.3 -5.2 0.08 3.4 0.22 2.0
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799 7 0.10 2.2 9.07 14.7 -10.0 -3.1 -0.12 -8.3 0.22 1.1
2800 - 3799 6 0.29 7-0 15.47 20.4 -32.7 -7.6 0.01 0.5 -0.21 -1.3
3800 - 4799 12 2.06 34.1 28.88 31.8 -39.7 -7.0 0.17 9.4 0.21 1.7
4800 - 5799 5 0.78 15.0 46.67 43.7 -29.6 -4.4 -0.36 -14.3 0.58 5.7
ALL VEHICLES 30 1.04 20.1 24.54 29-3 -29.7 -5.9-0.02 -1.0 0.26 1.9
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
3-54
-------
TABLE 17 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF 1975 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON ALL PHASE 1
VEHICLES BEFORE MAINTENANCE
DENVER
1973 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 27 VEHICLES
NO. OF HC
VEH MEAN S.D.
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
NO. OF CYL.
2
H
6
8
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 - 250
251 - 350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799
2800 - 3799
3800 - 4799
4800 - 5799
ALL VEHICLES
1
3
6
12
5
0
7
3
17
7
3
8
9
6
6
13
2
27
3.. 40
4.28
5.74
4.07
4.94
4.92
3.80
4:61
4.92
3.80
4.52
4.69
5.30
3.90
4.71
3.89
4.60
0.0
0.8
2.2
1.1
2.0
1.7
0.8
1.7
1.7
0.8
1.1
2.2
1.5
1.2
1.9
0.6
1.6
CO
MEAN S.D.
41
88
113
72
65
69
63
88
69
63
82
94
72
70
87
93
80
.77
.26
.59
.45
.87
.21
.29
.97
.21
.29
.28
.92
.65
.12
.86
.95
.99
0.0
39.2
44.1
17.2
20.7
17.8
35.8
35.7
17.8
35.8
18.3
46.6
16.8
29.0
40.5
22.2
32.7
C02
MEAN S.D.
399.0
404.1
497.3
618.5
328.7
323.2
368.0
605.5
323.2
368.0
556.4
649.2
304.1
421.7
601.8
741.4
505.9
0.0
95.8
122.1
127.6
67.1
56.6
43.8
99.8
56.6
43.8
67.2
106.9
28.0
73.4
87.8
38.4
157.2
NOXC
MEAN S.D.
6.33
3.24
1.70
1.87
1.40
1.46
4.71
1.85
1.46
4.71
1.66
2.01
1.36
3.07
2.02
1.45
2.06
0.0
1.4
0.7
0.9
0.5
0.4
1.6
0.8
0.4
1.6
0.7
0.9
0.4
2.1
0.8
0.2
1.3
MPG
MEAN
18.7
16.0
12.8
11.9
19.8
19.8
18.5
11.7
19.8
18.5
12.7
10.9
20.4
16.3
11.8
9.8
13.7
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES 'PER GALLON
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
3-55
-------
TABLE 17 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF 1975 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON ALL PHASE 1
VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
1973 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 27 VEHICLES
NO. OF HC
VEH MEAN S.D.
VEHICLE
MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL
IMPORTS
•
MOTORS
1
3
6
12
5
2.88
3-33
4.45
3.95
4.29
0.0
0.3
1.6
1.3
2.0
CO
MEAN S.D.
36.75
54.29
74.87
55.93
52.40
0.0
4.5
29.1
16.3
14.2
C02
MEAN S.D.
429.7
438.5
555.5
631.8
324.7
0.0
88.4
141.9
121.3
58.4
NOXC
MEAN S.D.
2.79
3.27
2.10
2.04
1.44
0.0
1.0
0.8
1.2
0.4
MPG
MEAN
17.9
16.6
12.9
12.1
21.1
NO. OF CYL.
2
4
6
8
0
7
3
17
4.21
3.06
4:10
1.8
0.2
1.3
53.55
46.77
62.76
12.8
8.7
22.9
322.5
402.0
636.4
48.3
28.6
81.9
1.52
3.46
2.11
0.4
0.7
1.1
21.1
18.3
11.9
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151
251
250
350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA
1800 -
2800 -
3800 -
4800 -
WEIGHT
2799
3799
4799
5799
7
3
8
9
6
6
13
2
4.21
3.06
3.99
4.20
4.50
3.14
4.30
3.30
1.8
0.2
1.1
1.6
1.7
0.7
1.4
0.1
53.55
46.77
57.76
67.20
56.35
51.22
62.03
65.10
12.8
8.7
17.1
27.3
11.4
12.7
26.4
3.2
322.5
402.0
582.7
684.3
306.8
454.1
631.7
753.3
48.3
28.6
44.2
79.0
26.8
79.3
71.2
48.7
1.52
3.46
1.69
2.48
1.49
2.36
2.30
1.92
0.4
0.7
0.6
1.3
0.5
1.3
1.2
0.1
21.1
18.3
12.9
11.1
21.7
16.3
11.9
10.2
ALL VEHICLES
27 4.01 1.4 58.59 20.0 529.0 160.0 2.11 1.1 14.0
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
3-56
-------
TABLE 17 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF 1975 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE EXHAUST EMISSION REDUCTIONS
J ON ALL PHASE 1 VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
1973 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 27 VEHICLES
FUEL
NO. OF HC CO C02 NOXC ECONOMY
VEH IMPR JIMPR IMPR $IMPR IMPR JIMPR IMPR JIMPR IMPR JIMPR
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS 1 0.52 15.3 5.02 12.0 -30.7 -7.7 3.54 55.9 -0.80 -4.3
CHRYSLER 3 0.95 22.1 33-97 38.5 -34.3 -8.5 -0.03 -1.0 0.66 4.1
FORD 6 1.30 22.6 38.71 34.1 -58.1 -11.7 -0.40 -23.3 0.13 1.0
GENERAL MOTORS 12 0.12 2.9 16.51 22.8 -13-3 -2.2-0.17 -9-0 0.21 1.8
IMPORTS 5 0.65 13.2 13.47 20.4 3.9 1.2-0.04 -2.6 1.28 6.5
NO. OF CYL.
2 0
4 7 0.71 14.5 15.66 22.6 0.6 0.2 -0.06 -4.2 1.30 6.5
6 3 0.73 19.4 16.52 26.1 -34.0 -9.2 1.26 26.7 -0.22 -1.2
8 17 0.51 11.6 26.21 29.5 -30.9 -5.1-0.26 -14.3 0.19 1.6
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151 7 0.71 14.5 15.66 22.6 0.6 0.2-0.06 -4.2 1.30 6.5
151 - 250 3 0.73 19.4 16.52 26.1 -34.0 -9.2 1.26 26.7 -0.22 -1.2
251 - 350 8 0.53 11.8 24.52 29.8 -26.2 -4.7 -0.03 -1.9 0.26 2.0
MORE THAN 350 9 0.48 10.3 27.71 29.2 -35.1 -5.4-0.47 -23.4 0.14 1.2
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799 6 0.79 15.0 16.30 22.4 -2.7 -0.9 -0.13 -9.4 1.27 6.2
2800 - 3799 6 0.75 19.4 18.90 27.0 -32.4 -7.7 0.70 23.0 -0.01 -0.0
3800 - 4799 13 0.41 8.7 25.83 29.4 -29.9 -5.0-0.28 -14.0 0.19 1.6
4800 - 5799 2 0.59 15.1 28.85 30.7 -11.9 -1.6 -0.47 -32.4 0.40 4.1
ALL VEHICLES 27 0.59 12.7 22.40 27-7 -23.1 -4.6 -0.04 -2.1 0.30 2.2
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
3-57
-------
TABLE 17 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF 1975 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON ALL PHASE 1
VEHICLES BEFORE MAINTENANCE r
DENVER
1972 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 25 VEHICLES
NO. OF HC
VEH MEAN S.D.
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
NO. OF CYL.
2
4
6
8
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 - 250
251 - 350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799
2800 - 3799
3800 - 4799
4800 - 5799
ALL VEHICLES
1
3
6
11
4
0
6
3
16
6
2
8
9
7
9
8
1
25
31.68
8.96
4.47
5.51
4.33
4.49
16.30
5.47
4.49
8.61
8.58
5.61
8.18
5.97
6.03
4.13
6.53
0.0
4.7
0.7
1.3
0.7
0.7
14.1
1.7
0.7
6.7
9.4
1.9
10.4
3-0
1.8
0.0
5.7
CO
MEAN S.D.
104
142
61
93
46
53
114
90
53
118
87
94
61
88
94
127
84
.83
.35
.62
.23
.17
.90
.12
.38
.90
.76
.02
.96
.15
.55
.90
.55
.47
0.0
89.8
15.6
22.6
8.4
13.8
62.7
41.1
13.8
88.0
28.8
49.3
23.0
43.9
50.3
0.0
42.3
C02
MEAN S.D.
308.6
411.5
516.7
533.7
318.0
325.1
315.2
555.6
325.1
318.5
474.3
600.4
317.2
465.0
584.7
703.3
471.4
0.0
120.0
151.5
91.5
57.8
56.1
44.9
77.0
56.1
63-0
79.5
65.8
43.2
90.9
57.6
0.0
132.9
NOXC
MEAN S.D.
1.63
2.22
3.89
2.45
2.09
2.24
2.26
2.92
2.24
2.58
2.17
3.44
2.42
2.28
3.49
1.55
2.68
0.0
1.3
0.6
1.3
0.6
1.0
1.2
1.3
1.0
1.5
0.8
1.4
1.1
0.9
1.4
0.0
1.2
MPG
MEAN
15.5
13.1
14.1
12.7
22.0
20.9
16.2
12.4
20.9
16.7
13.9
11.6
20.2
14. .2
11.8
9-7
14.2
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
3-58
-------
TABLE 17 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF 1975 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON ALL PHASE 1
VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
1972 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 25 VEHICLES
NO. OF HC
VEH MEAN S.D.
CO
MEAN S.D.
C02
MEAN S.D.
NOXC
MEAN S.D.
MPG
MEAN
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
1
3
6
11
4
2.55
4.27
3.47
4.44
4.77
0.0
0.1
0.6
0.9
1.2
48.53
62.77
49.40
69.63
44.43
0.0
12.5
12.1
34.9
7.6
376.0
475.7
563.2
590.8
307.1
0.0
100.8
174.6
97.7
54.0
1.76
2.96
3.22
2.48
2.02
0.0
0.5
1.1
1.4
0.7
19.3
15.1
13.6
12.4
22.6
NO. OF CYL.
2
1
6
8
0
6
3
16
4.55
3-45
4.15
1.3
0.9
0.8
50.36
57.91
62.56
14.7
16.5
30.4
322.3
372.4
616.1
51.2
4.5
77.7
1.79
2.90
2.87
0.7
1.5
1.2
21.3
18.7
12.2
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN
151 -
251 -
MORE THAN
151
250
350
350
6
2
8
9
4.55
3.91
3.92
4.18
1.3
0.6
0.9
0.8
50.36
62.60
55.24
67.51
14.7
20.4
9.5
40.0
V
322.3
370.6
534.5
662.0
51.2
4.6
71.8
70.6
1.79
3.47
2.23
3.31
0.7
1.5
0.7
1.3
21.3
18.4
14.0
11.4
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 -
2800 -
3800 -
4800 -
2799
3799
4799
5799
7
9
8
1
3.85
4.26
4.27
4.72
1.1
0.9
1.0
0.0
51.16
54.06
57.76
170.09
12.8
10.7
13.4
0.0
328.2
514.7
649.7
782.3
48.8
82.7
55.0
0.0
2.15
2.32
3-50
1.38
1.2
0.7
1.2
0.0
21.1
14.5
11.8
8.3
ALL VEHICLES 25 4.16
1.0 59.07 25.9 516.4 151.5 2.61
1.2 14.3
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES' PER GALLON
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
3-59
-------
TABLE 17 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF 1975 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE EXHAUST EMISSION REDUCTIONS
ON ALL PHASE 1 VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
1972 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 25 VEHICLES
FUEL
NO. OF HC CO C02 NOXC ECONOMY
VEH IMPR $IMPR IMPR $IMPR IMPR flMPR IMPR JIMPR IMPR JIMPH
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS 1 29.13 91-9 56.30 53-7 -67.4 -21.8-0.12 -7.5 3.81 24.7
CHRYSLER 3 4.69 52.3 79.58 55.9 -64.2 -15.6 -0.74 -33.2 1.72 12.9
FORD 6 1.00 22.4 12.22 19.8 -46.5 -9.0 0.67 17.2 -0.52 -3.7
GENERAL MOTORS 11 1.07 19.4 23.60 25.3 -57.1 -10.7-0.03 -1.1 -0.30 -2.3
IMPORTS 4 -0.44 -10.3 1.74 3-8 10.9 3.4 0.07 3-3 0.68 3.1
NO. OF CYL.
2 0
4 6 -0.07 -1.5 3.55 6.6 2.7 0.8 0.45 20.2 0.41 1.9
6 3 12.85 78.8 56.21 49.3 -57-2 -18.2 -0.64 -28.3 2.46 15.1
8 16 1.32 24.1 27.82 30.8 -60.5 -10.9 0.05 1.9 -0.22 -1.7
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151 6 -0.07 -1.5 3-55 6.6 2.7 0.8 0.45 20.2 0.41 1.9
151 - 250 2 4.70 54.6 56.16 47.3 -52.1 -16.4 -0.90 -34.9 1.77 10.6
251 - 350 8 4.66 54.3 31.78 36.5 -60.2 -12.7 -0.06 -2.7 0.10 0.7
MORE THAN 350 9 1.44 25.6 27.46 28.9 -61.6 -10.3 0.14 4.0 -0.20 -1.8
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799 7 4.33 53.0 9.99 16.3 -11.0 -3.5 0.27 11.1 0.88 4.4
2800 - 3799 9 1.71 28.7 34.50 39.0 -49.7 -10.7 -0.04 -1.7 0.23 1-6
3800 - 4799 8 1.76 29.2 37.14 39.1 -65.1 -11.1 -0.00 -0.1 -0.02 -0.1
4800 - 5799 1 -0.59 -14.3 -42.55 -33-4 -79.1 -11.2 0.16 10.6 -1.34 -13-9
ALL VEHICLES 25 2.37 36.3 25.40 30.1 -44.9 -9-5 0.07 2.5 0.06 0.4
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
3-60
-------
TABLE 17 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF 1975 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON ALL
FAILED VEHICLES BEFORE MAINTENANCE
DENVER
1975 & 1976 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 332 VEHICLES
NO. OF HC
VEH MEAN S.D.
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
NO. OF CYL.
2
4
6
8
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 - 250
251 - 350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799
2800 - 3799
3800 - 4799
4800 - 5799
9
29
16
56
14
0
24
18
82
24.
14
45
41
20
28
60
16
2.53
3-78
3.44
3.77
2.92
2.89
2.68
3.92
2.89
2.73
3.33
4.43
2.95
2.88
3.71
4.82
0.5
1.6
2.4
2.5
0.8
1.0
0.6
2.4
1.0
0.6
1.3
3.1
1.0
0.9
1.9
4.0
CO
MEAN S.D.
48.80
86.96
79.76
85.67
48.61
53.54
54.48
90.85
53.54
53.88
82.51
96.66
54.99
59.99
89.39
98.28
16.5
31.2
72.3
33.4
18.6
20.9
19.1
42.3
20.9
19.6
31.9
50.4
21.7
26.4
44.6
36.5
C02
MEAN S.D.
420.6
538.4
620.4
514.3
338.1
342.4
418.4
574.5
342.4
405.7
522.0
621.3
337.6
437.4
556.5
654.2
52.8
86.6
110.1
103.9
64.9
50.8
41.0
79.6
50.8
35.5
50.2
77.6
56.9
67.6
71.4
72.0
NOXC
MEAN S.D.
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
.45
.58
.62
.31
.51
• 34
• 95
.47
.34
.80
.44
.61
.30
.74
.48
.53
0.7
0.5
0.7
0.5
0.7
0.6
0.9
0.5
0.6
0.9
0.6
0.5
0.6
0.8
0.5
0.4
MPG
MEAN
17.6
12.9
11.7
13-4
20.9
20.4
17.3
12.2
20.4
17.8
13.4
11.3
20.5
16.4
12.5
10.8
ALL VEHICLES
124 3.54
2.1 78.35 40.2 506.9 119.9 1.52 0.6 13.8
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
3-61
-------
TABLE 17 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF 1975 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON ALL
FAILED VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
1975 & 1976 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 332 VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
HC
MEAN S.D.
CO
MEAN S.D.
C02
MEAN S.D.
NOXC
MEAN S.D.
MPG
MEAN
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
.
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
9
29
16
56
14
2.63
1.96
1.84
2.01
2.50
0.8
1.0
.0.9
1.2
0.9
61.59
48.30
35-89
49.63
37.46
47.3
21.4
24.5
28.1
16.0
448.9
609.5
701.0
565.9
370.3
60.9
112.1
137.7
108.8
75.7
1.83
1.24
.1.52
1.13
1.60
0.5
0.5
0.6
0.4
0.7
16.0
12.8
11.6
13.6
20.3
NO. OF CYL.
2
4
6
8
0
24
18
82
2.31
2.24
1.98
1.1
0.9
1.1
38.63
49.18
49.03
14.7
38.7
27.2
370.0
452.2
643.8
53.8
46.7
89.0
~i
1.33
1.51
1.26
L
0.7
0.6
0.5
20.3
16.5
12.2
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN
151 -
251 -
MORE THAN
151
250
350
350
24
14
45
41
2.31
2.07
1.85
2.20
1.1
0.9
1.0
1.2
38.63
38.35
49.27
52.48
14.7
19.3
32.3
28.3
370.0
438.8
576.8
703.1
53.8
40.7
48.2
84.1
1.33
1.42
1.21
1.37
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.5
20.3
17.6
13."
11.2
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 -
2800 -
3800 -
4800 -
2799
3799
4799
5799
20
28
60
16
2.36
2.08
1.99
2.06
1.2
0.9
1.0
1.2
37.93
43.35
50.19
53.08
16.6
33.9
24.6
33.7
365.8
477.0
622.6
736.2
63.4
77.. 9
76.2
94.9
1.27
1.44
1.25
1.37
0.6
0.6
0.5
0.3
20.5
16.1
12.5
10.7
ALL VEHICLES
124 2.08
1.1 47.04 27.4 563.0 139.6 1.31 0.5 13-8
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:^.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
3-62
-------
TABLE 17 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF 1975 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE EXHAUST EMISSION REDUCTIONS
ON ALL FAILED VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
1975 & 1976 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 332 VEHICLES
FUEL
NO. OF HC CO C02 NOXC ECONOMY
VEH IMPR JIMPR IMPR $IMPR IMPR $IMPR IMPR *IMPR IMPR £CMPR
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS 9 -0.10 -3-8 -12.80 -26.2 -28.3 -6.7 0.62 25.3-1.54 -8.8
CHRYSLER 29 1.81 48.0 38.66 44.5 -71.1 -13-2 0.33 21.1 -0.09 -0.7
FORD 16 1.60 46.4 43.87 55.0 -80.6 -13.0 0.10 6.2 -0.10 -0.9
GENERAL MOTORS 56 1.75 46.5 36.04 42.1 -51.6 -10.0 0.18 13.7 0.22 1.6
IMPORTS 14 0.42 14.4 11.15 22.9 -32.3 -9.6 -0.09 -6.3 -0.64 -3.1
NO. OF CYL.
2 0
4 24 0.58 20.2 14.91 27.9 -27.6 -8.1 0.01 0.9 -0.11 -0.5
6 18 0.44 16.5 5.29 9.7 -33-7 -8.1 0.44 22.4 -0.78 -4.5
8 82 1.94 49.5 41.82 46.0 -69.3 -12.1 0.21 14.4 0.04 0.4
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151 24 0.58 20.2 14.91 27.9 -27.6 -8.1 0.01 0.9 -0.11 -0.5
151 - 250 14 0.66 24.1 15.53 28.8 -33-1 -8.2 0.37 20.8-0.23 -1-3
251 - 350 45 1.48 44.3 33.24 40.3 -54.9 -10.5 0.23 16.0 0.04 0.3
MORE THAN 350 41 2.24 50.4 44.18 45.7 -81.8 -13.2 0.24 14.7 -0.08 -0.7
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799 20 0.59 19-9 17.06 31.0 -28.2 -8.3 0.03 2.6 0.02 0.1
2800 - 3799 28 0.79 27.6 16.63 27.7 -39.6 -9.1 0,30 17.1 -0.33 -2.0
3800 - 4799 60 1.72 46.3 39.20 43.9 -66.1 -11.9 0.23 15.8 0.02 0.1
4800 - 5799 16 2.76 57.3 45.21 46.0 -82.0 -12.5 0.16 10.3 -0.03 -0.3
ALL VEHICLES 124 1.46 41.3 31.31 40.0 -56.0 -11.1 0.21 13-6-0.05 -0.3
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON
ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
3-63
-------
TABLE 17 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF 1975 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON ALL
FAILED VEHICLES BEFORE MAINTENANCE
DENVER
1974 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 100 VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
HC
MEAN S.D.
CO
MEAN S.D.
C02
MEAN S.D.
NOXC
MEAN S.D.
MPG
MEAN
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
1
6
8
9
7
7.31
4.89
7.24
6.26
4.24
0.0
1.2
3-7
3.2
0.8
77.60
88.76
100.68-
99.75
64.81
0.0
25.6
39.2
38.0
13.3
395.5
475.6
446.2
522.4
307-1
0.0
105.8
1-70.2
125.5
31.1
1.49
2.85
1.58
1.52
1.63
0.0
1.3
1.0.
0.6
0.7
16.1)
14.1
14.1
12.7
21.0
NO. OF CYL.
2
4
6
8
0
12
5
14
4.58
4.56
7.35
1.3
1.6
3.4
74.97
74.06
106.93
23.6
5.9
38.0
303.3
389.3
577.5
29.5
16.3
74.9
1.44
2.11
2.03
0.8
1.0
1.1
20.1
17.1
11.5
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN
151
251 -
MORE THAN
151
250
350
350
12
5
8
6
4.58
4.56
6.83
8.03
1.3
1.6
3-1
3.9
74.97
74.06
86.32
134.41
23.6
5.9
34.4
22.4
303.3
389.3
536.1
632.7
29.5
16.3
54.9
62.9
1.44
2.11
2.18
1.82
0.8
1.0
1.4
0.4
20.1
17-1
12.8
10.2
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 -
2800 -
3800 -
4800 -
2799
3799
4799
5799
10
11
7
3
4.79
5.44
6.33
9.49
1.4
3.1
0.8
5.6
67.32
81.93
105.70
150.87
24.5
17.7
28.8
19.9
315.8
401.4
578.6
682.2
56.5
80 ..2
37.4
35.3
1.78
1.91
1.76
1.70
1.0
1.4
0.4
0.5
20.3
16.2
11.6
9.3
ALL VEHICLES
31 5.83 2.8 89.26 33.2 441.0 139.7 1.82 1.0 14.8
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
3-64
-------
TABLE 17 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF 1975 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON ALL
FAILED VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
1974 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 100 VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
NO. OF CYL.
2
4
6
8
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 - 250
251 - 350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799
2800 - 3799
3800 - 4799
4800 - 5799
1
6
8
9
7
0
12
5
14
12
5
8
6
10
11
7
3
HC
MEAN S.D.
5.94
3.87
5.33
5.12
3.61
3.91
3.93
5.47
3.91
3.93
5.37
5.61
3.99
4.50
5.28
5.61
0.0
0.9
1.5
2.5
0.5
1.0
1.1
2.1
1.0
1.1
2.6
1.4
1.0
2.3
1.2
1.9
CO
MEAN S.D.
72.88
62.22
71.72
61.31
55.25
62.32
61.98
64.34
62.32
61.98
57.76
73.12
58.89
66.60
59.25
74.09
0.0
14.9
22.8
23-4
17.2
21.4
14.7
21.6
21.4
14.7
27.0
5.9
22.1
23.8
13.9
4.3
C02
MEAN S.D.
402
525
483
572
333
333
429
625
333
429
592
670
344
438
635
730
.7
.1
.6
.1
.5
.0
.7
.8
.0
.7
.2
.6
.0
.8
.3
.9
0.0
106.1
163.7
149.7
55.9
44.0
21.0
85.3
44.0
21.0
74.3
83.4
67.0
80.9
50.9
46.4
NOXC
MEAN S.D.
1.74
2.04
1.50
1.60
1.49
1.36
1.82
1.81
1.36
1.82
1.64
2.05
1.51
1.48
1.98
1.87
0.0
0.6
0.9
0.6
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.7
0.3
0.8
0.7
0.5
0.3
MPG
MEAN
16.6
14.0
14.5
13.0
20.6
20.0
16.4
11.9
20.0
16.4
12.7
11.0
19.8
15.9
11.9
10.3
ALL VEHICLES
31 4.62 1.7 63.18 20.0 480.9 151.3 1.64 0.7 14.9
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
3-65
-------
TABLE 17 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF 1975 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE EXHAUST EMISSION REDUCTIONS
ON ALL FAILED VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
1974 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 100 VEHICLES
FUEL
NO. OF HC CO C02 NOXC ECONOMY
VEH IMPR JKIMPR IMPR $IMPR IMPR *IMPR IMPR %JMPE IMPR *IMPR
VEHiaE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS 1 1.37 18.7 4.72 6.1 -7-3 -1.8-0.25 -17.1 0.14 0.8
CHRYSLER 6 1.02 20.8 26.54 29.9 -49.5 -10.4 0.80 28.2 -0.10 -0.7
FORD 8 1.91 26.4 28.95 28.8 -37.5 -8.4 0.09 5.4 0.33 2.3
GENERAL MOTORS 9 1.14 18.2 38.44 38.5 -49-7 -9.5-0.08 -5.3 0.27 2.1
IMPORTS 7 0.63 14.9 9.57 14.8 -26.4 -8.6 0.14 8.4 -0.46 -2.2
NO. OF CYL.
2 0 '
4 12 0.67 14.6 12.65 16.9 -29.8 -9.8 0.09 6.0 -0.36 -1.8
6 5 0.63 13.8 12.09 16.3 -40.4 -10.4 0.29 13-5 -0.61 -3-6
8 14 1.87 25.5 42.59 39.8 -48.3 -8.4 0.22 10.6 0.38 3-3
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151 12 0.67 14.6 12.65 16.9 -29.8 -9.8 0.09 6.0 -0.36 -1.8
151 - 250 5 0.63 13.8 12.09 16.3 -40.4 -10.4 0.29 13.5 -0.61 -3-6
251 - 350 8 1.46 21.4 28.56 33.1 -56.1 -10.5 0.55 25.0-0.12 -0.9
MORE THAN 350 6 2.42 30.2 61.28 45.6 -37-9 -6.0-0.23 -12.4 0.84 8.2
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799 10 0.80 16.7 8.43 12.5 -28.3 -9.0 0.28 15.5 -0.57 -2.8
2800 - 3799 11 0.95 17.4 15.33 18.7 -37.4 -9.3 0.43 22.5 -0.30 -1.8
3800 - 4799 7 1.05 16.6 46.46 44.0 -56.6 -9.8 -0.22 -12.3 0.31 2.6
4800 - 5799 3 3.88 40.9 76.78 50.9 -48.6 -7.1 -0.17 -9.8 0.91 9-7
ALL VEHICLES 31 1.21 20.7 26.08 29.2 -39-9 ^9.0 0.18 9.7 0.12 0.8
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
3-66
-------
TABLE 17 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF 1975 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON ALL
FAILED VEHICLES BEFORE MAINTENANCE
DENVER
1973 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 121 VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
NO. OF CYL.
2
4
6
8
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 - 250
251 - 350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799
2800 - 3799
3800 - 4799
4800 - 5799
ALL VEHICLES
2
13
14
12
12
0
17
7
29
17
7
17
12
15
19
14
5
53
HC
MEAN S.D.
6.11
6.75
6.04
6.88
5.37
5.59
4.07
7.17
5.59
4.07
6.09
8.71
5.34
5.76
7.03
8.72
6.25
3.8
5.4
2.2
3.2
1.9
2.2
0.6
4.0
2.2
0.6
1.7
5.7
2.2
1.9
5.3
3.5
3-4
CO
MEAN S.D.
89
105
115
95
62
69
80
114
69
80
103
130
65
91
114
147
95
.12
.81
.84
.05
.22
.52
.05
.50
.52
.05
.38
.25
.62
.29
.59
.92
.52
67-0
37.1
44.2
29.4
22.0
22.1
31.9
39.8
22.1
31.9
31.1
46.5
20.4
26.1
42.8
42.8
39.7
C02
MEAN S.D.
478.6
471.9
470.9
521.8
305.4
306.0
377.0
543.9
306.0
377.0
499.5
606.7
306.3
421.1
554.0
652.1
445.5
112.6
102.6
106.2
147.7
51.8
44.0
32.0
84.4
44.0
32.0
64.1
69.2
46.3
73.. 5
69.8
50.4
130.1
NOXC
MEAN S.D.
3-78
1.95
1.71
1.80
1.25
1.28
3.08
1.73
1.28
3.08
1.64
1.86
1.28
2.04
2.06
1.35
1.76
3.6
1.0
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.4
1.9
0.7
0.4
1.9
0.6
0.8
0.4
1.4
0.8
0.3
1.0
MPG
MEAN
13-9
13.5
13-2
12.8
21.1
20.5
17.2
11.9
20.5
17.2
13.0
10.6
20.8
15.2
11.7
9.7
14.4
EMISSION RESULTS IN J3RAMS PER MILE
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
3-67
-------
TABLE 17 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF 1975 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON ALL
FAILED VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
1973 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 121 VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
HC
MEAN S.D.
CO
MEAN S.D.
C02
MEAN S.D.
NOXC
MEAN S.D.
MPG
MEAN
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
2
13
14
12
12
3.41
5.71
4.80
4.86
4.76
0.8
6.0
1.8
1.5
2.2
37.44
72.56
70.12
67.18
53.91
1.0
39.6
27.9
19.8
15.7
484.6
529.1
521.2
555.1
315.9
77.6
129.7
134.5
157.2
43-3
2.97
1.91
1..85
1.78
1.20
0.2
1.0
0.7
0.7
0.3
16.0
13.1
13.7
13.1
21.1
NO. OF CYL.
2
4
6
8
0
17
7
29
4.57
3.44
5.58
1.9
0.4
4.2
55.57
58.63
72.34
13.9
16.6
33.8
315.8
411.3
598.2
36.4
31.2
96.1
1.35
2.27
1.85
0.4
1.0
0.8
21.3
17.3
12.2
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN
151 -
251 -
MORE THAN
151
250
350
350
17
7
17
12
4.57
3.44
4.83
6.65
1.9
0.4
1.7
6.1
55.57
58.63
63.93
84.24
13.9
16.6
31.8
34.4
315.8
411.3
541.9
677.9
36.4
31.2
56.1
84.4
1.35
2.27
1.72
2.04
0.4
1.0
0.8
0.8
21.3
17-3
13-5
10.7
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 -
2800 -
3800 -
4800 -
2799
3799
4799
5799
15
19
14
5
4.46
4.40
6.21
5.26
2.0
1.6
5.7
1.8
53.54
59.47
77.73
86.35
12.7
21.8
40.0
18.6
317.8
459.0
604.9
728.1
38.4
82.7
88.6
41.6
1.27
1.85
2.15
1.63
0.4
0.9
0.9
0.3
21.3
15-7
11.9
10.1
ALL VEHICLES
53 4.98 3.3 65.15 27.8 482.9 150.7 1.75 0.8
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
3-68
-------
TABLE 17 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF 1975 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE EXHAUST EMISSION REDUCTIONS
ON ALL FAILED VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
1973 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 121 VEHICLES
FUEL
NO. OF HC CO C02 NOXC ECONOMY
VEH IMPR $IMPR IMPR *IMPR IMPR *IMPR IMPR *IMPR IMPR $IMPR
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS 2 2.70 44.1 51.68 58.0 -6.0 -1.2 0.81 21.5 2.10 15.1
CHRYSLER 13 1.03 15-3 33.24 31.4 -57.2 -12.1 0.04 2.2-0.03 -0.3
FORD 14 1.24 20.5 45.72 39-5 -50.2 -10.7 -0.14 -8.0 0.52 3-9
GENERAL MOTORS 12 2.02 29.4 27.86 29-3 -33-3 -6.4 0.01 0.7 0.32 2.5
IMPORTS 12 0.61 11.4 8.31 13-4 -10.4 -3.4 0.05 4.0 0.23 1.1
NO. OF CYL.
2 0
4 17 1.02 18.2 13.95 20.1 -9-9 -3-2 -0.07 -5.4 0.75 3-7
6 7 0.62 15.3 21.42 26.8 -34.3 -9.1 0.81 26.2 0.05 0.3
8 29 1.59 22.2 42.16 36.8 -54.3 -10.0-0.12 -6.9 0.28 2.3
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151 17 1.02 18.2 13.95 20.1 -9.9 -3.2-0.07 -5.4 0.75 3-7
151 - 250 7 0.62 15.3 21.42 26.8 -34.3 -9.1 0.81 26.2 0.05 0.3
251 - 350 17 1.26 20.6 39.45 38.2 -42.5 -8.5 -0.08 -4.9 0.47 3-6
MORE THAN 350 12 2.06 23.7 46.00 35.3 -71.1 -11.7 -0.18 -9.5 0.10 0.9
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799 15 0.87 16.4 12.08 18.4 -11.5 -3-7 0.01 0.7 0.52 2.5
2800 - 3799 19 ^35 23.7 31.83 34.9 -37-9 -9.0 0.19 9.3 0.44 2.9
3800 - 4799 14 0.82 11.6 36.86 32.2 -50.9 -9.2-0.10 -4.6 0.15 1.3
4800 - 5799 5 3.45 39.7 61.57 41.6 -76.0 -11.7-0.28 -20.7 0.35 3-6
ALL VEHICLES 53 1.28 20.4 30.37 31.8 -37.4 -8.4 0.02 1.1 0.34 2.4
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
3-69
-------
TABLE 17 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF 1975 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON ALL
FAILED VEHICLES BEFORE MAINTENANCE
DENVER
1972 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE~SIZE 111 VEHICLES
NO. OF HC
VEH MEAN S.D.
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
NO. OF CYL.
2
4
6
8
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 - 250
251 - 350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799
2800 - 3799
3800 - 4799
4800 - 5799
2
10
14
16
8
0
14
8
28
14
7
17
12
17
19
13
1
19.61
8.65
5.90
6.58
4.64
4.88
10.40
7.11
4.88
7-36
8.52
7.18
6.71
7.40
6.93
6.04
17.1
3.0
1.4
2.3
1.1
1.2
9.0
2.4
1.2
2.9
6.3
2.6
6.6
2.6
2.6
0.0
CO
MEAN S.D.
102.
134.
,79.
95.
54.
59.
111.
103-
59.
112.
97.
112.
70.
96.
114.
107.
86
28
39.
01
65
31
39
43
31
33
20
37
68
02
14
73
2.8
44.0
27.1.
22.3
20.0
16.4
32.3
36.7
16.4
34.8
26.1
46.6
26.7
33-3
43.6
0.0
C02
MEAN S.D.
313.6
409.5
426.0
490.8
307.2
297.2
326.5
508.0
297.2
329-1
463.2
554.7
299.4
434.4
544.4
575.7
7.1
100.7
141.0-
82.0
50.9
43.2
42.6
72.1
43.2
45.3
69.9
61.5
35.1
87.9
57.5
0.0
NOXC
MEAN S.D.
1.41
2.06
2.97
2.36
2.14
2.27
2.03
2.57
2.27
2.09
2.38
2.75
2.18
2.36
2.66
3-30
0.3
0.7
1.0
0.8
0.9
0.9
1.2
0.9
0.9
1.2
0.8
0.9
1.0
0.8
0.9
0.0
MPG
MEAN
16.5
13.7
15.6
13.1
21.8
21.9
16.6
12.8
21.9
16.8
13-8
11.8
20.6
14.6
11.9
11.6
ALL VEHICLES
50 7.01 4.3 92.35 37.5 419.9 117.4 2.40 0.9 15-1
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
3-70
-------
TABLE 17 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF 1975 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON ALL
FAILED VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
1972 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 111 VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
HC
MEAN S.D.
CO
MEAN S.D.
C02
MEAN S.D.
NOXC
MEAN S.D.
MPG
MEAN
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
2
10
14
16
8
5.06
5.96
4.64
4.81
5.18
3.5
3.6
1.7
2.3
2.0
81.14
75.05
56.73
59.87
45.61
46.1
39.8
17.2
15.4
21.0
347.9
480.9
459.4
553.7
308 .6
39.7
103.5
167.2
87.8
48.7
1.45
2.30
2.84
2.20
2.12
0.4
0.7
1.1
0.7
0.9
18.1
14.4
15.8
13.4
22.4
NO. OF CYL.
2
4
6
8
0
14
8
28
4.86
4.31
5.38
1.9
1.4
2.8
48.36
64.94
65.48
17.5
26.7
27.1
303.6
365.1
574.8
39.5
36.9
70.4
2.21
2.48
2.39
0.8
1.3
0.8
22.5
18.5
12.8
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN
151 -
251 -
MORE THAN
151
250
350
350
14
7
17
12
4.86
4.56
5.33
5.21
1.9
1.3
3-5
1.7
48.36
67.29
55.92
77.60
17.5
27.9
11.1
36.8
303.6
363-5
528.7
623.4
39.5
39.6
66.5
58.8
2.21
2.58
2.10
2.76
0.8
1.4
0.5
1.1
22.5
18.3
14.0
11.6
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 -
2800 -
3800 -
4800 -
2799
3799
4799
5799
17
19
13
1
4.67
5.65
4.71
5.11
1.9
3.3
1.2
0.0
54.29
58.64
71.80
59.35
24.3
13.8
37.1
0.0
312.5
499.4
603.1
623.6
43.3
108.0
34.9
0.0
2.18
2.20
2.74
3.23
1.0
0.6
1.0
0.0
21.5
14.6
12.1
12.1
ALL VEHICLES 50 5.06 2.4 60.60 25.5 465-3 138-9 2.36 0.9 15.4
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
3-71
-------
TABLE 17 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF 1975 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE EXHAUST EMISSION REDUCTIONS
ON ALL FAILED VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
1972 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 111 VEHICLES
FUEL
NO. OF HC CO C02 NOXC ECONOMY
VEH IMPR S&IMPR IMPR *IMPR IMPR *IMPR IMPR *IMPR IMPR $IMPR
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS 2 14.55 74.2 21.73 21.1 -34.3 -10.9 -0.04 -3.2 1.55 9.1
CHRYSLER 10 2.69 31.1 59.23 44.1 -71.4 -17.4 -0.24 -11.7 0.67 4.9
FORD ' 14 1.26 21.4 22.66 28.5 -33.4 -7.8 0.13 4.4 0.17 1.1
GENERAL MOTORS 16 1.77 26.9 35.14 37.0 -62.9 -12.8 0.16 7.0-0.04 -0.3
IMPORTS 8-0.53-11.5 9.04 16.5 -1.3 -0.4 0.02 0.8 0.61 2.8
NO. OF CYL.
2 0
4 14 0.02 0.5 10.95 18.5 -6.3 -2.1 0.06 2.6 0.61 2.8
6 8 6.09 58.5 46.45 41.7 -38.5 -11.8-0.45 -22.0 1.86 11.2
8 28 1.74 24.4 37.95 36.7 -66.8 -13.1 0.17 6.7 -0.03 -0.2
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151 14 0.02 0.5 10.95 18.5 -6.3 -2.1 0.06 2.6 0.61 2.8
151 - 250 7 2.80 38.0 45.04 40.1 -34.4 -10.5 -0.49 -23.6 1.57 9.3
251 - 350 17 3.19 37.4 41.28 42.5 -65.5 -14.1 0.28 11.9 0.21 1.5
MORE THAN 350 12 1.97 27.5 34.77 30.9 -68.7 -12.4-0.01 -0.3-0.12 -1.0
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799 17 2.04 30.3 16.39 23.2 -13.1 -4.4 -0.00 -0.1 0.95 1-6
2800 - 3799 19 1.75 23.7 37-37 38.9 -65.0 -15.0 0.16 6.8-0.02 -0.1
3800 - 4799 13 2.22 32.1 42.34 37.1 -58.7 -10.8 -0.07 -2.8 0.24 2.0
4800 - 5799 1 0.93 15.4 48.39 44.9 -47.9 -8.3 0.07 2.0 0.49 *-2
ALL VEHICLES 50 1.95 27.9 31.75 34.4 -45.3 -10.8 0.04 1.8 0.28 1.9
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
3-72
-------
TABLE 17 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF 1975 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON PHASE 1
PASSED VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
FUEL
MODEL
YEAR
NO OF
VEH
HC
MEAN
S.D
CO
MEAN
S.D.
C02
MEAN
S.D.
NOXC
MEAN
S.D.
ECONOMY
MEAN
S.D.
1975&1976 73
COLD TRANS 1
COLD TRANS 2
COLD STAB 1
COLD STAB 2
HOT TRANS 1
HOT TRANS 2
75 COMP 1
75 COMP 2
1974
22
COLD TRANS 1
COLD TRANS 2
COLD STAB 1
COLD STAB 2
HOT TRANS 1
HOT TRANS 2
75 COMP 1
75 COMP 2
1973
16
COLD TRANS 1
COLD TRANS 2
COLD STAB 1
COLD STAB 2
HOT TRANS 1
HOT TRANS 2
75 COMP 1
75 COMP 2
1972
14
COLD TRANS 1
COLD TRANS 2
COLD STAB 1
COLD STAB 2
HOT TRANS 1
HOT TRANS 2
75 COMP 1
75 COMP 2
3-0
2.7
1.2
1.0
1
1.7
1.5
8.9
5.4
4 4
3-8
4 9
4 2
5-4
4.2
5-6
I
0
6
4
4.1
4.4
4.2
12.2
1.1
.6
2
8
2
1
2-3
2.8
0.9
1.2
0.8
0-9
1 0
1.2
58.19
54.08
28.31
21 69
34.62
29.82
36.18
30.57
73.00
48.34
72.56
56.12
81.36
58.28
96.4
88.6
62
44
7'.
.21
66 90
52.42
70.82
55.62
i-5:
.4
.2
.2
154.7
156.2
164.7
562
24.78 576
21.95 576
17.07 588.6 161.2
20.80 506.9 132.4
17.60 519.7
r8 554.4
19J
15.4
137-8
152.2
4 567.2 152.9
.20 546.7 13
144.2
.0
77.22 541.2 143.8
23.88 567.0 145.6
31.20 546.
17.36 578.
33-63 478.8
18.53 500.1
36.74 527.1
14.78 554.6
119.2
121.2
132.8
137.6
31-30 608.2
34.37 618.5
16.37 608.3
13-59 631.4
23.17 528.1
14.50 541.2
19.37 586.4
15.54 604.1
156
0.8
4
29
29
20.7
39-9- -._
26.21 516.5 1
33-37 548.0 1
•»!•*•» "•*;
475.0 128.7
495-2 146.7
2.1
2.0
1.4
1.3
2.1
1.9
1.7
1.6
2.3
2.3
U
2.0
2.2
3-7
3.3
2.2
2.2
3.9
3.
3.
2.
0.9 13-4
1.0
0-2
0.8
1.1
1.1
0.9
0.9
13.2
14.2
14.2'
15.7
14.3
1.6
1.6
1.1
1.1
1.9
12.9
12.4
13.6
13.3
1.4
9
.5
3.2
3-3
3-7
3.6
3.9
2.3
2.2
1.5
1.6
2.4
2.4
1.9
1.9
1.2
1.1
0*.8
1.2
1.3
0.9
0.9
11-9
12.3
13.1
13.3
14.6
14.7
13.2
13.5
3-3
2.8
2'.l
3.0
3.1
2.8
2.9
1.2
1.3
0.7
0.9
1.6
1.5
1.0
1.1
11.4
11.4
12.4
12.5;
13.8
14.0
12.5
12.6
2.6
2.6
2.5
2.5
2.9
2.9
2.6
2.6
3-5
3:1
3.7
3-9
4.5
3.5
3.9
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
3-73
-------
TABLE 17 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF 1975 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE EXHAUST EMISSION REDUCTIONS
ON PHASE 1 PASSED VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
FUEL
MODEL NO OF
YEAR VEH
1975&1976 73
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
75 COMP
1974 22
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
75 CCMP
1973 16
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
75 COMP
1972 14
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
75 COMP
HC
IMPR JIMPR
0.
0.
0.
0.
3
0.
0.
1.
-o.
0.
0.
0.
-0.
0.
0.
22
23
36
26
51
59
64
20
00
19
17
14
11
36
26
0.24
7-6
19-0
20.5
15.4
39-5
13.4
13.1
22.1
-0.0
5-4
4.6
3.6
-2.0
9-1
6.0
5.3
CO
IMPR JIMPR
4.10
6.62
4.80
5.61
27.85.
24.66
16.44
23.08
7-81
18.49
-14.48
15.20
-3-97
13-74
-1.18
6.03
7-0
23.4
13.9
15.5
24.4
33.8
22.7
28.4
8.1
29.5
21.6
21.5
-4.5
20.4
-2.1
8.8
C02
IMPR JIMPR
-13-9
-12.4
-12.8
-12.8
-25.8
-31.5
-21.2
-27.6
-10.3
-23.1
-13.1
-17.7
-24.7
-40.0
-20.2
-31.5
-2.5
-2.2
-2.5
-2.3
-4.8
-5.8
-4.4
-5.2
-1.7
-3-8
-2.5
-3.0
-4.7
-7.5
-4.2
-6.1
NOXC
IMPR $IMPR
0.13
0.09
0.15
0.12
0.07
-0.10
-0.07
-0.05
-0.05
-0.14
-0.08
-0.11
0.31
-0.00
0.29
0.14
6.0
6.7
7-3
6.7
3.2
-6.5
-2.9
-2.8
-2.1
-8.4
-3-3
-5.2
8.5
-0.2
7-5
4.8
ECONOMY
IMPR JIMPR
-0.13
-0.03
-0.11,
-0.07
0.48
0.18
0.16
0.25
0.03
0.11
0.22
0.12
-0.57
-0.35
-0.54
-0.45
-1.0
-0.2
-0.7
-0.5
4.0
1.1
1.1
1.9
0.3
0.9
1.6
0.9
-11.4
-2.6
-3-5
-3.2
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1..85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
3-74
-------
TABLE 17 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF 1975 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON ALL PHASE 1
VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
FUEL
MODEL
YEAR
NO. OF
VEH
HC
MEAN
S.D.
CO
MEAN
S.D.
C02
MEAN
S.D.
NOXC
MEAN
S.D.
ECONOMY
MEAN
S.D.
1975&1976 112
COLD TRANS 1
COLD TRANS 2
COLD STAB 1
COLD STAB 2
HOT TRANS 1
HOT TRANS 2
75 COMP 1
75 COMP 2
1974 30
COLD TRANS 1
COLD TRANS 2
COLD STAB
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
HOT TRANS
75 COMP 1
75 COMP 2
1973
27
COLD TRANS 1
COLD TRANS 2
COLD STAB 1
COLD STAB 2
HOT TRANS 1
HOT TRANS 2
75 COMP 1
75 COMP 2
1972
25
COLD TRANS 1
COLD TRANS 2
COLD STAB 1
COLD STAB 2
HOT TRANS 1
HOT TRANS 2
75 COMP 1
75 COMP 2
3.6
3.2
1.9
1.2
2.2
1.5
2.3
7-9
.3
3
6.2
.7
.2
.5
.2
3.8
4.6
4.0
3.^
•9
6.5
4.2
2.0
1.8
1.4
0.9
1.6
0.8
1.4
1.7 0.9
70.55
62.17
44.12
25.39
45.37
4.
9-90
35.50
10.5 109.96
1.1 86.Q6
1.5
1.1
1.7
1.2
2.7
1.0
' • W w
77.87
48.92
74.93
58.31
59^13
2.3
2.7
1-7
1.4
1.4
1.2
1.6
1.4
99.96
90.16
78.19
48.54
72.05
53-99
80.99
58.59
7.9 6.0 101.07
1.5
5.9
1.0
5.2
0.8
5.7
1.0
8
8
4
6
84.47
59.07
^
3
545..0 149.8
• j
41.2< . .
2.48 566.0 155.
0.18 553.8 156.3
19.46 581.8 159.5
491 '
37.73
23.82 511
37.86 535.0 14b.1
20.80 559.3 151.5
6 12?
1 1:
,0
.7
69.05
24.83
37.03
15.52
35.96
20.75
38.54
14.80
522.8
541.6
518.5
557.0
460.4
481.4
503.5
533.2
149.2
150.4
147.6
157.2
124.1
127.9
140.4
146.4
3
4.38 525.
.06 537.
.62 522.5
172
176
162
42 553.0 I6f
18 45
1.46 47
:1
137.7
139.5
32.73 505.9 157.2
20.02 529.0 160.0
5.18 489.5 139.7
8.05 517.3 157.0
8.53 482.1 137.8
.41 22.80 542.1
.45 4;
30.82 4i
42
25.95
159:1
(7.5 122
I6.5 134.6
1 471.4 132.9
516.4 151.5
2.1
2.0
1.4
1.3
2.0
1.9
1.7
1.6
0.9
0.9
0.9
0.7
1.0
1.0
°-2
0.8
13-3
13.2
14.1
14.2-
15.6
15.5
14.3
14.3
3.4
3-3
3.8
3:?
4.0
I'l
3 .0
2.3
2.2
1.4
1.5
2.3
2.3
1.8
1.9
1.1
1.0
0.6
0.7
1.1
1.2
0.8
0.9
12.3
12.8
13.6
13.8
15.0
15.1
13.6
13.9
3.6
3.1
3.5
3.3
1:1
3.5
3.3
2.4
2.4
1.6
1.7
2.6
2.6
2.1
2.1
1.6
1.3
1.0
0.9
U
1.3
1.1
12.6
12.7
13.5
13.9
15.2
15.5
13.7
14.0
3.4
3.6
3.4
3.6
4.0
4.0
3-5
3-7
1.4
1.3
1.0
0.9
1!
1.2
1.2
13.2
13-1
13.9
14.1
15.7
15.7
14.2
14.3
3-U
3.8
3-3
1.9
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
3-75
-------
TABLE 17 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF 1975 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE EXHAUST EMISSION REDUCTIONS
ON ALL PHASE 1 VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
FUEL
MODEL NO. OF
YEAR VEH
1975&1976 112
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
75 CCMP
1974 30
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
75 CCMP
1973 27
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
75 CCMP
1972 25
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
75 CCMP
HC
IMPR JIMPR
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
2
2
1
2
.41
.67
.61
.60
.56
.71
.50
.04
.54
.68
.43
-59
.08
.70
.95
.37
11.4
36.1
28.2
26.1
32.5
16.5
10.7
20.1
8.7
16.4
10.3
12.7
26.4
42.7
33.0
36.3
CO
IMPR JIMPR
8.38
18.72
10.48
14.34
23.90
28.94
16.62
24.54
9.80
29; 64
18.06
22.40
11.67
36.83
13.91
25.40
11.9
42.4
23.1
28.7
21.7
37.2
22.2
29-3
9.8
37-9
25.1
27.7
11.6
42.7
20.3
30.1
C02
IMPR $IMPR
-21.0
-28.0
-19.5
-24.3
-18.7
-38.5
-21.0
-29-7
-11.9
-30.5
-17.4
-23.1
-27.8
-60.0
-29.0
-44.9
-3.9
-5.1
-4.0
-4.5
-3.6
-7.4
-4.6
-5.9
-2.3
-5.8
-3.8
-4.6
-5.7
-12.5
-6.6
-9.5
NOXC
IMPR *IMPR
0.15
0.09
0.17
0.13
0.13
-0.08
-0.01
-0.02
0.04
-0.10
0.01
-0.04
0.28
-0.09
0.20
0.07
6.9
6.9
8.4
7.4
5.7
-5.8
-0.3
-1.0
1.5
-6.3
0.6
-2.1
8.6
-4.5
5.8
2.5
ECONOMY
IMPR 5&IMPH
-0.13
0.08
-0.03
0.00
0.48
0.19
0.17
0.26
0.09
0.38
0.33
0.30
-0.06
0.14
-0.03
0.06
-1.0
0.6
-0.2
0.0
3-9
1.4
1.1
1.9
0.?
2.9
2.2
2.2
-o.t
1.0
-0.2
o.n
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
3-76
-------
TABLE 17 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF 1975 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON ALL FAILED
VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
MODEL NO. OF HC
YEAR VEH MEAN S.D.
CO
MEAN S.D.
C02
MEAN S.D.
NOXC
MEAN S.D.
FUEL
ECONOMY
MEAN S.D.
1975&1976 124
COLD TRANS 1
COLD TRANS 2
COLD STAB 1
COLD STAB 2
HOT TRANS 1
HOT TRANS 2
75 COMP 1
75 COMP 2
1974 31
COLD TRANS 1
COLD TRANS 2
COLD STAB
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
HOT TRANS
75 COMP 1
75 COMP 2
1973
53
COLD TRANS 1
COLD TRANS 2
COLD STAB 1
COLD STAB 2
HOT TRANS 1
HOT TRANS 2
75 COMP 1
75 COMP 2
1972
50
COLD TRANS 1
COLD TRANS 2
COLD STAB 1
COLD STAB 2
HOT TRANS 1
HOT TRANS 2
75 COMP 1
75 COMP 2
5.0
3.9
3.2
1.5
3-1
1.9
3.5
2.1
6.6
6.1
slo
4.4
I
9
6.0
4.4
5.5
4.7
6.3
5.0
8.5
4i6
7.0
5.1
4.
.3
.4
4.6 108.77
1:1 95'51
2.6
2.'7 55.47
I2.35
JO.oO
94.
49.50
5.42
46.92 525.8 125.7
"7.52 567.7 141.8
42.46 516.5 12;
.10 586
.13 474
.84 51
146,
112,
127,
29.1
40.22 506.9 119
27.38 563.0 139.6
6 467.1 147.5
:6.85 489
J7.64 445..
23.12 499.1
30.98 412.6
21.29 439
21.29 439.3 132.;
33.16 441.0 139.'
20.03 480.8 151.:
43.85
39.73
42.56
26.40
36.69
29.02
39-67
27.78
464
486
456.0
506
2 141.7
2 153.6
132._
7 161.2
3 120.1
411 _
435.2 130.8
445.5 130.1
482.9 150.7
44.46 438.) 124.3
45-72 462.6 138.0
43.74 427.2 121.2
27.11 489.6 150.1
29.32 392.^
22.88 420.!
37.49 419.9 117.4
25.47 465.3 138.9
108.3
121.1
2.0
1.7
1.2
1.0
1.8
1.5
1.5
1.3
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
12.9
12.6
13.6
13.7
15.1
15.0
13.8
13.8
3.0
3.0
3.2
3.1
3-7
3.5
3.3
3.1
2.4
2.0
1.3
1.3
2.3
2.0
1.8
1.6
1.4
1.0
0.7.
0.5
1.3
0.8
1.0
0.7
13.9
13.8
14.5,
14.8
16.2
16.2
14.8
14.9
4.1
3.7
4.5
4.0
4.8
4.5
4.4
4.0
2.2
2,1
1.4
1.4
2.2
2.2
1.8
1.7
1.2
1.1
0.9
0.6
1.3
1.0
1.0
0.8
13.5
1^.6
14.2
14.6
15.9
16.2
14.4
14.8
3-9
4.0
3.9
4.2
4.5
4.6
4.0
4.2
2.9
1.
1.9
3.1
2.9
2.4
2.4
3.6
4.1
3-7
4.1
4.0
4.4
.7
.2
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE
FUEL ECONOMY IN- MILES PER GALLON [ -
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
3-77
-------
TABLE 17 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF 1975 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE EXHAUST EMISSION REDUCTIONS
ON ALL FAILED VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
FUEL
MODEL NO. OF
YEAR VEH
1975&1976 124
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
75 COMP
1974 31
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
75 COMP
1973 53
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
75 COMP
1972 50
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
75 COMP
HC-
IMPR *IMPR
1
1
1
1
0
1
0
1
1
1
0
1
1
2
1
1
.10
.74
.20
.46
.42
.81
.65
.21
.18
.57
.80
.28
.47
-37
.53
.95
22.1
53.9
39.3
41.3
6.5
30.4
13.0
20,7
15.0
26.2
14.4
20.4
17.3
34.5
24.7
27.9
CO
IMPR 56IMPR
15.43
44.22
18.61
31.31
10.58
37.56
15.83
26.08
17.17
40.75
20.51
30.37
13.26
45.23
19.95
31.75
16.4
56.0
28.4
40.0
11.2
39.8
21.1
29.2
15.8
42.1
24.7
31.8
12.2
47.7
26.4
34.4
C02
IMPR JIMPR
-41.9
-70.3
-39.5
-56.0
-22.6
-53.6
-26.7
-39.9
-22.0
-50.6
-23.9
-37.4
-24.5
-62.4
-28.5
-45.3
-8.0
-13.6
-8.3
-11.1
-4.8
-12.0
-6.5
-9.0
-4.7
-11.1
-5.8
-8.4
-5.6
-14.6
-7.3
-10.8
NOXC
IMPR *IMPR
0.27
0.12
0.32
0.21
0.35
0.02
0.34
0.18
0.05
-0.03
0.08
0.02
0.19
-0.11
0.22
0.04
13.6
10.4
17.4...
13.6
14.7
1.6
14.8
9.7
2.3
-1.9
3.6
1.1
6.4
-5.9
7.0
1.8
ECONOMY
IMPR $IMPR
-0.26
0.10
.-,0.16
-0.05
-0.10
0.27
0.01
0.12
0.18
0.43
0.32
0.34
0.02
0.41
0.25
0.28
-2.0
0.7
-1.1
-0.3
-0.7
1.8
0.1
0.8
1.3
3-0
2.0
2.1
0.2
2.8
1.5
1.9
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
3-78
-------
3.7.1.1 Federal Test Procedure Results - Air Pump/No Converter, Air
Pimp/Converter, Converter/No Air Pump, No Air Pump/No Converter - Before
and After Maintenance - Federal Test Procedure emission and fuel economy
summary data relating to the 1975/1976 model-year emission control
technology are presented on the thirty-six pages comprising the continu-
ation of Table 17 which follows. These data are further summarized
below where HC, CO, C02 and NOX emissions are presented in grams per
mile. Any discrepancies which may appear in these summarized data are
due to mathematical rounding of certain of the data.
3-79
-------
Summary of FTP Results on 1975/1976 Models
15 Passed Air Pump/No Converter Equipped Phase I Vehicles
Condition
As-Rec'd
After Mtce.
Improvement
Improvement (%)
Summary
29 Passed Air
Condition
As-Rec'd
After Mtce.
Improvement
Improvement (%)
Summary
HC CO
2.10 33.53
1.93 29.83
0.17 3.71
8.1 11.1
of FTP Results
Pump/Converter
HC CO
1.35 32.43
1.22 26.80
0.14 5.64
10.1 17.4
of FTP Results
C02 NOx
447.7 1.70
433.6 1.40
-14.2 0.30
3.2 17.5
on 1975/1976 Models
Pjpg
17.5
18.2
0.74
4.2
Equipped Phase I Vehicles
C02 NOX
621.9 1.75
645.5 1.78
-23.6 -0.03
- 3.8 -1.8
on 1975/1976 Models
27 Passed Converter /No Air Pump Equipped Phase I
Condition
As-Rec'd
After Mtce.
Improvement
Improvement (%)
Summary
2 Passed No Air
Condition
As-Rec'd
After Mtce.
Improvement
Improvement (%)
HC CO
1.89 42.56
1.42 35.53
0.48 7.03
25.2 16.5
of FTP Results
C02 NOx
559.2 1.74
575.6 1.56
-16.4 0.18
- 2.9 10.6
on 1975/1976 Models
Pump/No Converter Equipped Phase I
HC CO
1.81 24.28
1.88 24.05
-0.07 0.23
-3.7 1.0
C02 NOx
311.8 1.60
322.5 1.61
-10.7 -0.01
- 3.4 -0.8
rapg
13.1
12.8
-0.27
-2.1
Vehicles
rcpg
14.0
14.0
-0.08
-0.6
Vehicles
m£&
25.0
24.2
-0.72
-2.9
3-80
-------
Summary of FTP Results on 1975/1976 Models
17 (All) Air Pump/No Converter Equipped Phase I Vehicles
Condition HC CO C02 NOX mpg
As-Rec'd 2.15 33.88 442.4 1.70 17.7
After Mtce. 1.99 31.01 430.1 1.46 18.3
Improvement 0.16 2.86 12.3 0.24 0.63
Improvement (%) 7.4 8.4 2.8 14.3 3.6
Summary of FTP Results on 1975/1976 Models
36 (All) Air Pump/Converter Equipped Phase I Vehicles
Condition HC CO C02 NO* mpg
As-Recfd 1.90 44.59 612.0 1.69 12.9
After Mtce. 1.36 28.54 644.1 1.69 12.8
Improvement 0.54 16.04 -32.2 0.00 -0.10
Improvement (%) 28.2 36.0 - 5.3 0.1 -0.8
Summary of FTP Results on 1975/1976 Models
50 (All) Converter/No
Condition
As-Rec'd
After Mtce.
Improvement
Improvement (%)
HC
2.63
1.74
0.89
33.7
Air Pump Equipped Phase I Vehicles
CO
61.66
42.09
19.57
31.7
C02
541.2
572.7
-31.5
- 5.8
NOX
1.61
1.48
0.13
8.0
mpg
13.7
13.8
0.04
0.3
Summary of FTP Results on 1975/1976 Models
9 (All) No Air Pump/No Converter Equipped Phase I Vehicles
Condition HC CO C02 NOx mpg
As-Rec'd 2.41 36.10 367.7 2.31 20.5
Atter Mtce. 2.30 35.88 389.3 1.93 19.6
Improvement 0.11 0.22 -21.6 0.39 -0.95
Improvement (%) 4.6 0.6 - 5.9 16.8 -4.6
3-81
-------
Summary of FTP Results on 1975/1976 Models
8 Failed Air Pump/No Converter Equipped Phase I and II
Condition HC CO C02 NOx
As-Rec'd 2.44 45.47 417.8 1.97
After Mtce. 2.49 52.87 446.5 1.83
Improvement -0.05 - 7.4 -28.7 0.14
Improvement (%) -2.2 -16.3 - 6.9 7.0
Summary of FTP Results on 1975/1976 Models
Vehicles
mpg
17.9
16.5
-1.35
-7.5
17 Failed Air Pump/Converter Equipped Phase I and II Vehicles
Condition HC CO * C02 NOX
As-Rec'd 4.41 77.05 620.5 1.55
After Mtce. 1.91 36.75 692.7 1.43
Improvement 2.50 40.31 -72.2 0.11
Improvement (%) 56.7 52.3 -11.6 7.4
Summary of FTP Results on 1975/1976 Models
84 Failed Converter/No Air Pump Equipped Phase I and II
Condition HC CO C02 NOx
As-Rec'd 3.59 86.63 518.6 1.39
After Mtce. 2.00 49.52 577.7 1.16
Improvement 1.58 37.11 -59.1 0.23
Improvement (%) 44.1 42.8 -11.4 16.3
Summary of FTP Results on 1975/1976 Models
15 Failed No Air Pump /No Converter Equipped Phase I and
Condition HC CO COg NOfl
As-Rec'd 2.89 50.96 360.4 1.98
After Mtce. 2.48 41.71 395.7 1.74
Improvement 0.41 9.27 -35.3 0.24
Improvement (%) 14.2 18.2 - 9.8 12.0
mpg
11.7
11.7
-0.01
-0.1
Vehicles
mpg
13.3
13.4
0.09
0.6
II Vehicles
19.7
18.9
-0.82
-4.1
3-82
-------
TABLE 17 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF 1975 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON
ALL PHASE 1 PASSED VEHICLES BEFORE MAINTENANCE
DENVER
AIR PUMP / NO CONVERTER
1975 & 1976 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 112 VEHICLES
NO. OF HC CO C02 NOXC MPG
VEH MEAN S.D. MEAN S.D. MEAN S.D. MEAN S.D. MEAN
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
0
0
1 1.63 0.0 33.93 0.0 374.1 0.0 2.09 0.0 20.5
0
13 2.19 0.9 33.94 12.8 446.1 219.4 1.73 1.0 17.5
NO. OF CYL.
2
4
6
8
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 - 250
251 - 350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799
2800 - 3799
3800 - 4799
4800 - 5799
ALL VEHICLES
2 3.07
10 2.03
1 2.37
1 1.23
12 2.21
1 2.37
1 1.23
0
12 2.27
1 1.63
1 1.23
0
2.3 20.78 13.4 844.3 257.3 0.64 0.0 10.0
0.6 37.57 10.6 336.6 51.2 2.03 0.9 22.1
0.0 39.96 0.0 436.5 0.0 1.17 0.0 17.5
0.0 17.97 0.0 682.1 0.0 1.81 0.0 12.4
1.0 34.77 12.3 421.3 217.3 1.80 1.0 18.4
0.0 39.96 0.0 436.5 0.0 1.17 0.0 17.5
0.0 17.97 0.0 682.1 0.0 1.81 0.0 12.4
0.9 35.27 12.4 426.4 216.8 1.72 1.0 18.1
0.0 33.93 0.0 374.1 0.0 2.09 0.0 20.5
0.0 17.97 0.0 682.1 0.0 1.81 0.0 12.4
14 2.15 0.9 33.94 12.3 441.0 211.6 1.75 0.9 17.7
pripr i?™J!£§ULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE ,
rutiL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GAT,I ON
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
3-83
-------
TABLE 17 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF 1975 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON
ALL PHASE 1 PASSED VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
AIR PUMP / NO CONVERTER
1975 & 1976 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 112 VEHICLES
NO. OF HC CO C02 NOXC MPG
VEH MEAN S.D. MEAN S.D. MEAN S.D. MEAN S.D.
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS 0
CHRYSLER 0
FORD 1 1.11 0.0 24.46 0.0 417.2 0.0 1.93 0.0 19.3
GENERAL MOTORS 0
IMPORTS 13 2.03 0.7 29.97 9.6 430.3 136.1 1.42 0.6 18.3
NO. OF CYL.
2 2 2.36 0.8 15.90 2.6 611.8 36.7 0.70 0.0 13.8
4 10 1.93 0.8 32.44 8.0 360.3 59.6 1.59 0.6 21.3
6 1 1.84 0.0 36.04 0.0 486.4 0.0 1.25 0.0 16.2
8 1 1.66 0.0 21.74 0.0 697.3 0.0 1.88 0.0 12.0
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151 12 2.00 0.8 29.69 9.7 402.3 112.3 1.44 0.7 19.5
151 - 250 1 1.84 0.0 36.04 0.0 486.4 0.0 1.25 0.0 16.2
251 - 350 1 1.66 0.0 21.74 0.0 697.3 0.0 1.88 0.0 12.0
MORE THAN 350 0
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799 12 2.06 0.7 30.65 9.7 408.0 114.9 1.38 0.6 19.2
2800 - 3799 1 1.11 0.0 24.46 0.0 417.2 0.0 1.93 0.0 19.3
3800 - 4799 1 1.66 0.0 21.74 0.0 697.3 0.0 1.88 0.0 12.0
4800 - 5799 0
ALL VEHICLES 14 1.96 0.7 29.57 9.4 429.3 130.8 1.46 0.6 18.1
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
3-84
-------
TABLE 17 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF 1975 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE EXHAUST EMISSION REDUCTIONS ON
iu ALL PHASE 1 PASSED VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
AIR PUMP / NO CONVERTER
1975 & 1976 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 112 VEHICLES
FUEL
NO. OF HC CO C02 NOXC ECONOMY
VEH IMPR JIMPR IMPR ZIMPR IMPR $IMPR IMPR $IMPR IMPR JIMPR
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS 0
CHRYSLER 0
FORD 1 0.52 31.8 9.47 27.9 -43.1 -11.5 0.16 7.7 -1.191 -5.8
GENERAL MOTORS 0
IMPORTS 13 0.16 7.3 3.97 11.7 15.8 3.6 0.31 17.8 0.82 4.7
NO. OF CYL.
2 2 0.71 23.2 4.88 23.5 232.5 27.5 -0.05 -8.1 3.77 37.6
4 10 0.11 5.3 5.12 13.6 -23.7 -7.0 0.44 21.8 -0.81 -3.7
6 1 0.53 22.4 3.92 9.8 -50.0 -11.4 -0.09 -7.6 -1.34 -7.7
8 1-0.43-35.4 -3.77 -21.0 -15.2 -2.2-0.07 -3.9-0.38 -3.1
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151 12 0.21 9.5 5.08 14.6 19.0 4.5 0.36 20.1 1.12 6.1
151 - 250 1 0.53 22.4 3.92 9.8 -50.0 -11.4-0.09 -7.6-1.34 -7.7
251 - 350 1-0.43-35.4 -3.77 -21.0 -15.2 -2.2-0.07 -3.9-0.38 -3.1
MORE THAN 350 0
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799 12 0.21 9.3 4.62 13.1 18.4 4.3 0.34 19.7 1.03 5.7
2800 - 3799 1 0.52 31.8 9.47 27.9 -43.1 -11.5 0.16 7.7-1.19 -5.8
3800 - 4799 1-0.43-35.4 -3.77 -21.0 -15.2 -2.2-0.07 -3.9-0.38 -3.1
4800 - 5799 0
ALL VEHICLES 14 0.19 8.7 4.36 12.9 11.6 2.6 0.30 17.0 0.70 4.0
^ECONoKiPMIL GRAMS PER ****
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
3-85
-------
TABLE 17 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF 1975 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON
ALL PHASE 1 PASSED VEHICLES BEFORE MAINTENANCE
DENVER
AIR PUMP / CONVERTER
1975 & 1976 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 112 VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD •
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
NO. OF CYL.
2
4
6
8
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 - 250
251 - 350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799
2800 - 3799
3800 - 4799
4800 - 5799
2
0
18
6
4
0
5
4
21
5
4
4
17
3
10
11
6
HC
MEAN S.D.
0.88
1.52
0.95
1.43
1.38
0.99
1.42
1.38
0.99
1.06
1.50
1.20
1.15
1.49
1.52
0.2
0.7
0.4
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.2
0.8
0.7
0.5
0.9
0.6
CO
MEAN S.D.
10.35
38.60
18.01
36.23
32.85
19.01
34.67
32.85
19.01
18.40
38.50
25.72
23.67
37.27
40.76
1.8
21.9
13.5
23.8
21.9
9.0
23.2
21.9
9.0
13.7
23.5
13.6
18.2
26.8
18.0
C02
MEAN S.D.
585.7
651.8
672.0
410.6
418.4
552.9
679.8
418.4
552.9
559.9
708.0
412.9
530.4
670.6
776.5
15.5
104.6
127.7
27.4
29.4
43.7
94.0
29.4
43.7
45.8
78.8
33.0
66.8
62.9
56.9
NOXC
MEAN S.D.
4
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
.18
.48
.97
.22
.13
.36
.94
.13
.36
.73
.98
.29
.42
.13
.71
3.1
0.5
0.3
0.5
0.5
0.4
1.1
0.5
0.4
0.8
1.2
0.6
0.6
1.5
0.3
MPG
MEAN
11,1
12.li
12.6
18.8
18.7
15.1
12.0
18.7
15.1
15.0
11.5
19.1
15.5
12.1
10.5
ALL VEHICLES
30 1.35 0.7 32.28 21.8 619.3 128.9 1.73 1.0 13-2
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
3-86
-------
TABLE 17 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF 1975 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON
ALL PHASE 1 PASSED VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
AIR PUMP / CONVERTER
1975 & 1976 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 112 VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
HC
MEAN S.D.
CO
MEAN S.D.
C02
MEAN S.D.
NOXC
MEAN S.D.
MPG
MEAN
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
2
0
18
6
4
0.92
1.22
0.95
1.79
0.2
0.4
0.3
1.5
10.72
29.11
16.28
41.88
1.9
11.4
10.9
29.1
561.1
692.4
672.8
397.5
1.4
136.4
117.9
66.9
3.83
1.53
2.06
1.20
3.1
0.5
0.6
0.5
15.3
12.0
12.7
18.9
NO. OF CYL.
2
4
6
8
0
5
4
21
1.62
0.93
1.18
1.3
0.4
0.3
36.28
18.67
26.40
28.2
11.4
12.7
404.9
551.4
713.4
60.2
70.3
112.4
1.13
1.22
1.99
0.5
0.5
1.1
19.0
15.2
11.7
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN
151 -
251 -
MORE THAN
151
250
350
350
5
4
4
17
1.62
0.93
1.07
1.21
1.3
0.4
0.2
0.4
36.28
18.67
16.01
28.85
28.2
11.4
8.4
12.5
404.9
551.4
554.3
750.9
60.2
70.3
35.2
87.9
1.13
1.22
1.78
2.04
0.5
0.5
0.9
1.1
19.0
15.2
15.2
11.1
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 -
2800 -
3800 -
4800 -
2799
3799
4799
5799
3
10
11
6
1.89
1.04
1.19
1.25
1.8
0.3
0.5
0.1
36.97
20.92
28.69
29.15
33.6
15.0
14.9
7.6
366.5
534.8
735.9
778.4
30.9
60.8
102.6
47.5
1.34
1.36
2.18
1.79
0.6
0.7
1.3
0.4
20.6
15.5
11.3
10.7
ALL VEHICLES
30 1.22 0.6 27.02 16.1 640.4 155.7 1.75 1.0 12.9
IN GRAMS pER MILE
JLES pER GALLON
ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A i:X85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
3-87
-------
TABLE 17 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF 1975 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE EXHAUST EMISSION REDUCTIONS ON
ALL PHASE 1 PASSED VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
AIR PUMP / CONVERTER
1975 & 1976 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 112 VEHICLES
FUEL
NO. OF HC CO C02 NOXC ECONOMY
VEH IMPR $IMPR IMPR JIMPR IMPR *IMPR IMPR $IMPR IMPR
VEHiaE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS 2 -0.04 -4.6 -0.37 -3.6 24.6 4.2 0.35 8.4 0.60 4,1
CHRYSLER 0
FORD ' 18 0.30 19.8 9.49 24.6 -40.6 -6.2 -0.05 -3.2 -0.41 -3.5
GENERAL MOTORS 6 0.00 0.3 1.74 9.6 -0.8 -0.1-0.09 -4.6 0.04 0.3
IMPORTS 4 -0.36 -25.2 -5.65 -15.6 13.2 3.2 0.02 1.6 0.13 0.?
NO. OF CYL.
2 0
4 5 -0.24 -17.2 -3.42 -10.4 13.5 3.2 -0.00 -0.3 0.30 1.6
6 4 0.06 6.0 0.34 1.8 1.4 0.3 0.14 10.5 0.06 0.1
8 21 0.23 16.3 8.27 23.8 -33.7 -5.0 -0.06 -2.9 -0.32 -2.6
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151 5 -0.24 -17.2 -3.42 -10.4 13.5 3.2 -0.00 -0.3 0.30 1.6
151 - 250 4 0.06 6.0 0.34 1.8 1.4 0.3 0.14 10.5 0.06 0,1
251 - 350 4 -0.01 -0.6 2.39 13.0 5.6 1.0 -0.05 -2.9 0.24 1.6
MORE THAN 350 17 0.29 19.1 9.65 25.1 -42.9 -6.1 -0.06 -2.9 -0.38 -3.1
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799 3 -0.69 -57.6 -11.25 -43.7 46.4 11.2 -0.05 -4.3 1.20 6.2
2800 - 3799 10 0.11 9.6 2.75 11.6 -4.4 -0.8 0.05 '3.7 0.01 0.1
3800 - 4799 11 0.30 19.8 8.58 23.0 -65.3 -9.7 -0.05 -2.2 -0.78 -6.5
4800 - 5799 6 0.27 17.9 11.61 28.5 -1.9 -0.2 -0.08 -4.4 0.22 2.1
ALL VEHICLES 30 0.13 9.6 5.26 16.3 -21.1 -3.4-0.02 -1.2-0.24 -1-8
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
3-88
-------
TABLE 17 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF 1975 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON
ALL PHASE 1 PASSED VEHICLES BEFORE MAINTENANCE
DENVER
CONVERTER / NO AIR PUMP
1975 & 1976 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 112 VEHICLES
NO
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
NO. OF CYL.
2
4
6
8
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 - 250
251 - 350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799
2800 - 3799
3800 - 4799
4800 - 5799
ALL VEHICLES
. OF
VEH
0
5
1
21
0
0
0
6
21
0
6
14
7
0
8
15
4
27
MEAN
2.37
1.57
1.79
1.58
1.98
1.58
2.20
1.55
1.81
2.04
1.52
1.89
HC
S.D.
1.4
0.0
0.7
0.9
0.8
0.9
0.9
0.1
1.3
0.6
0.1
0.8
MEAN
43.00
30.19
43.04
.
27.68
46.81
27.68
52.16
36.11
31.51
48.42
42.70
42.56
CO
S.D.
22.1
0.0
20.0
15.7
18.9
15.7
19.8
12.0
21.0
19.2
10.9
19.7
MEAN
556.7
620.4
556.9
464.9
586.1
464.9
547.4
663.6
483.9
561.3
701.8
559.2
C02
S.D
118
0
75
42
69
42
37
51
57
39
26
81
NOXC
. MEAN S.D.
.4
.0
.7
.3
.6
.3
.3
.4
.7
.9
.9
.9
1.65
2.11
1.75
2.16
1.62
2.16
1.61
1.65
2.00
1.69
1.41
1.74
0.4
0.0.
1.1
0.5
1.0
0.5
1.2
0.6
0.5
1.2
0.5
0.9
MPG
MEAN
14.0
13.2
14.1
17.3
13.3
17.3
13.9
12.2
16.5
13.8
11.5
14.0
IN GRAMS PER MILE
IN MILES PER GALLON
ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
3-89
-------
TABLE 17 CONT'D
i
SUMMARY OF 1975 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON
ALL PHASE 1 PASSED VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
CONVERTER / NO AIR PUMP
1975 & 1976 MODEL- YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 112 VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD •
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
NO. OF CYL.
2
4
6
8
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 - 250
251 - 350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799
2800 - 3799
3800 - 4799
4800 - 5799
0
5
1
21
0
0
0
6
21
0
6
14
7
0
8
15
4
HC
MEAN S
1.55
1.41
1.38
1.40
1.42
1.40
1.42
1.43
1.36
1.39
1.60
.D.
1.0
0.0
0.4
1.0
0.3
1.0
0.3
0.4
0.9
0.3
0.4
CO
MEAN
32
26
36
27
37
27
35
41
26
35
53
.34
.14
.73
•
.98
.68
.98
.86
.34
.06
.82
.39
S.D.
20.8
o.'o
15.6
20.0
14.7
20.0
13.4
17.5
17.2
12.8
11.2
C02
MEAN S.D.
585.1
631.3
570.7
464.9
607.2
464.9
569.2
683.3
493.0
580.4
722.8
138.6
0.0
78.3
46.2
70.1
46.2
33.1
62.3
66.3
41.1
50.0
NOXC
MEAN S.D.
1.56
2.41
1.52
1.98
1.44
1.98
1.41
1.49
1.80
1.55
1.10
0.6
0.0
1.0
0.5
1.0
0.5
1.1
0.7
0.6
1.1
0.2
MPG
MEAN
13.8
13,1
14.0
17.3
13,2
17,3
14,1
11,8
16,5
13,8
10,9
ALL VEHICLES 27 1.42 0.5 35.53 16.1 575.6 88.5 1.56 0.9 I1*-0
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
3-90
-------
TABLE 17 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF 1975 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE EXHAUST EMISSION REDUCTIONS ON
ALL PHASE 1 PASSED VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
CONVERTER / NO AIR PUMP
1975 & 1976 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 112 VEHICLES
FUEL
NO. OF HC CO C02 NOXC ECONOMY
VEH IMPR *IMPR IMPR *IMPR IMPR *IMPR IMPR 3&IMPR IMPR 5&IMPR
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS 0
CHRYSLER 5 0.82 34.6 10.66 24.8 -28.4 -5.1 0.09 5.6-0.20 -1.4
FORD 1 0.17 10.5 4.05 13.4 -11.0 -1.8 -0.30 -14.1 -0.08. -0.6
GENERAL MOTORS 21 0.41 22.9 6.31 14.7 -13.8 -2.5 0.23 13.1 -0.06 -0.4
IMPORTS 0-
NO. OF CYL.
2 0
4 0
6 6 0.18 11.1 -0.31 -1.1 -0.0 -0.0 0.18 8.4 0.00 0.0
8 21 0.56 28.5 9.13 19.5 -21.1 -3.6 0.19 11.4-0.10 -0.7
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151 0
151 - 250 6 0.18 11.1 -0.31 -1.1 -0.0 -0.0 0.18 8.4 0.00 0.0
251 - 350 14 0.78 35.6 16.31 31.3 -21.8 -4.0 0.19 12.1 0.14 1.0
MORE THAN 350 7 0.13 8.2 -5.23 -14.5 -19.7 -3.0 0.17 10.1-0.45 -3.7
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799 0
2800 - 3799 8 0.45 24.8 5.45 17.3 -9.1 -1.9 0.20 10.2 0.03 0.2
3800 - 4799 15 0.64 31.5 12.60 26.0 -19.1 -3.4 0.14 8.3 0.06 0.4
4800 - 5799 4 -0.08 -5.4 -10.69 -25.0 -21.0 -3.0 0.31 22.1 -0.54 -4.7
ALL VEHICLES 27 0.48 25.2 7.03 16.5 -16.4 -2.9 0.18 10.6 -0.08 -0.6
RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE
S552S IN JULES PER GALLON
ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
3-91
-------
TABLE 17 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF 1975 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON
ALL PHASE 1 PASSED VEHICLES BEFORE MAINTENANCE
DENVER
NO AIR PUMP / NO CONVERTER
1975 & 1976 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 112 VEHICLES
NO. OF HC CO C02 NOXC MPG
VEH MEAN S.D. MEAN S.D. MEAN S.D. MEAN S.D. MEM
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS 0
CHRYSLER 0
FORD1 0
GENERAL MOTORS 0
IMPORTS 2 1.81 0.2 24.28 22.1 311.8 68.8 1.60 0.6 25.G
NO. OF CYL.
2 0
4 2 1.81 0.2 24.28 22.1 311.8 68.8 1.60 0.6 25.0
6 0
8 0
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151 2 1.81 0.2 24.28 22.1 311.8 68.8 1.60 0.6 25.0
151 - 250 0
251 - 350 0
MORE THAN 350 0
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799 2 1.81 0.2 24.28 22.1 311.8 68.8 1.60 0.6 25.0
2800 - 3799 0
3800 - 4799 0
4800 - 5799 0
ALL VEHICLES 2 1.81 0.2 24.28 22.1 311.8 68.8 1.60 0.6 25.0
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
3-92
-------
TABLE 17 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF 1975 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON
ALL PHASE 1 PASSED VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
NO AIR PUMP / NO CONVERTER
1975 & 1976 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 112 VEHICLES
NO. OF HC CO C02 NOXC MPG
VEH MEAN S.D. MEAN S.D. MEAN S.D. MEAN S.D. MEAN
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS 0
CHRYSLER 0
FORD .0
GENERAL MOTORS 0
IMPORTS 2 1.88 0.0 24.05 24.8 322.5 71.4 1.61 0.4 24.2
NO. OF CYL.
2 0
4 2 1.88 0.0 24.05 24.8 322.5 71.4 1.61 0.4 24.2
6 0
8 0
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151 2 1.88 0.0 24.05 24.8 322.5 71.4 1.61 0.4 24.2
151 - 250 0
251 - 350 0
MORE THAN 350 0
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799 2 1.88 0.0 24.05 24.8 322.5 71.4 1.61 0.4 24.2
2800 - 3799 o
3800 - 4799 0
4800 - 5799 0
ALL VEHICLES 2 1.88 0.0 24.05 24.8 322.5 71.4 1.61 0.4 24.2
ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1^:1.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
3-93
-------
TABLE 17 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF 1975 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE EXHAUST EMISSION REDUCTIONS ON
ALL PHASE 1 PASSED VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
NO AIR PUMP / NO CONVERTER
1975 & 1976 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 112 VEHICLES
FUEL
NO. OF HC CO C02 NOXC ECONOMY
VEH IMPR $IMPR IMPR $IMPR IMPR JIMPR IMPR *IMPR IMPR
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS 0
CHRYSLER 0
FORD ' 0
GENERAL MOTORS 0
IMPORTS 2 -0.07 -3.7 0.23 1.0 -10.7 -3.4 -0.01 -0.8 -0.72 -2.'
NO. OF CYL.
2 0
H 2-0.07 -3.7 0.23 1.0 -10.7 -3.4-0.01 -0.8-0.72 -2.,
6 0
8 0
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151 2 -0.07 -3.7 0.23 1.0 -10.7 -3.4 -0.01 -0.8 -0.72 -2.9
151 - 250 0
251 - 350 0
MORE THAN 350 0
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799 2 -0.07 -3.7 0.23 1.0 -10.7 -3.4 -0.01 -0.8 -0.72 -2.9
2800 - 3799 0
3800 - 4799 0
4800 - 5799 0
ALL VEHICLES 2-0.07 -3.7 0.23 1.0 -10.7 -3.4-0.01 -0.8-0.72 -2.9
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
3-94
-------
TABLE 17 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF 1975 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON
ALL PHASE 1 VEHICLES BEFORE MAINTENANCE
DENVER
AIR PUMP / NO CONVERTER
1975 & 1976 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 112 VEHICLES
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
NO. OF HC
VEH MEAN S.D.
0
0
CO C02
MEAN S.D. MEAN S.D.
NOXC
MEAN S.D.
MPG
MEAN
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
NO. OF CYL.
2
4
6
8
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 - 250
251 - 350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799
2800 - 3799
3800 - 4799
4800 - 5799
ALL VEHICLES
1 1.63 0.0 33.93 0.0 374.1 0.0 2.09 0.0 20.5
0
15 2.23 0.9 34.28 12.7 440.3 203.7 1.73 0.9 17.7
2 3.07
12 2.12
1 2.37
1 1.23
14 2.25
1 2.37
1 1.23
0
14 2.31
1 1.63
1 1.23
0
2.3 20.78 13.4 844.3 257.3 0.64 0.0 10.0
0.6 37.38 10.8 347.6 53.0 1.98 0.9 21.5
0.0 39.96 0.0 436.5 0.0 1.17 0.0 17.5
0.0 17.97 0.0 682.1 0.0 1.81 0.0 12.4
0.9 35.01 12.2 418.6 200.0 1.79 1.0 18.5
0.0 39.96 0.0 436.5 0.0 1.17 0.0 17.5
0.0 17.97 0.0 682.1 0.0 1.81 0.0 12.4
0.9 35.44 12.3 423.0 199.7 1.73 1.0 18.3
0.0 33.93 0.0 374.1 0.0 2.09 0.0 20.5
0.0 17.97 0.0 682.1 0.0 1.81 0.0 12.4
16 2.20 0.9 34.26 12.2 436.2 197.5 1.75 0.9 17.9
ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
3-95
-------
TABLE 17 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF 1975 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON
ALL PHASE 1 VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
AIR PUMP / NO CONVERTER
1975 & 1976 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 112 VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD '
GENERAL
IMPORTS
MOTORS
0
0
1
0
15
HC
MEAN S.D.
1.11
2.08
0.0
0.7
CO
MEAN S.D.
24.46
31.30
0.0
10.2
C02
MEAN S.D.
417.2
426.8
0.0
126.4
NOXC
MEAN S.D.
1.93
1.48
0.0
0.7
MPG
MEAN
19.3
18.11
NO. OF CYL.
2
4
6
8
2
12
1
1
2.36
2.01
1.84
1.66
0.8
0.7
0.0
0.0
15.90
33.69
36.04
21.74
2.6
8.7
0.0
0.0
611.8
367.6
486.4
697.3
36.7
56.7
0.0
0.0
0.70
1.64
1.25
1.88
0.0
0.7
0.0
0.0
13.8
20.8
16.2
12.0
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 -
251 -
250
350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA
1800 -
2800 -
3800 -
4800 -
WEIGHT
2799
3799
4799
5799
14
1
1
0
14
1
1
0
2.06
1.84
1.66
2.12
1.11
1.66
0.7
0.0
0.0
0.7
0.0
0.0
31.15
36.04
21.74
31.98
24.46
21.74
10.3
0.0
0.0
10.2
0.0
0.0
402.5
486.4
697.3
407.5
417.2
697.3
103.4
0.0
0.0
105.8
0.0
0.0
1.50
1.25
1.88
1.46
1.93
1.88
0.7
0.0
0.0
0.7
0.0
0.0
19.1
16.2
12.0
19.1
19.3
12.0
ALL VEHICLES
16 2.02 0.7 30.87 10.0 426.2 122.2 1.51 0.7
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
3-96
-------
TABLE 17 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF 1975 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE EXHAUST EMISSION REDUCTIONS ON
ALL PHASE 1 VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
AIR PUMP / NO CONVERTER
1975 & 1976 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 112 VEHICLES
FUEL
NO. OF HC CO C02 NOXC ECONOMY
VEH IMPR WMPR IMPR *IMPR IMPR $IMPR IMPR *IMPR IMPR *IMPR
VEHICLE MPG,
AMER. MOTORS 0
CHRYSLER 0
FORD 1 0.52 31.8 9.47 27.9 -43.1 -11.5 0.16 7.7 -1.19 -5.8
GENERAL MOTORS 0
IMPORTS 15 0.15 6.6 2.98 8.7 13.5 3.1 0.25 14.3 0.68 3.9
NO. OF CYL.
2
4
6
8
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 - 250
251 - 350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799
2800 - 3799
3800 - 4799
4800 - 5799
2 0.71 23.2
12 0.10 4.8
1 0.53 22.4
1-0.43-35.4
14 0.19 8.4
1 0.53 22.4
1 -0.43 -35.4
0
14 0.19 8.2
1 0.52 31.8
1-0.43-35.4
0
4.88 23.5 232.5
3.69 9.9 -20.0
3.92 9.8 -50.0
-3.77 -21.0 -15.2
3.86 11.0 16.1
3.92 9.8 -50.0
-3.77 -21.0 -15.2
27.5 -0.05
-5.8 0.34
-11.4 -0.09
-2.2-0.07
-8.1 3.77 37.6
17.4 -0.70 -3.3
-7.6 -1.34 -7.7
-3.9-0.38 -3.1
3.8 0.29 16.0 0.92 5.0
-11.4 -0.09 -7.6 -1.34 -7.7
-2.2 -0.07 -3.9 -0.38 -3.1
3.46 9.8 15.6
9.47 27.9 -43.1
-3.77 -21.0 -15.2
3.7 0.27
-11.5 0.16
-2.2-0.07
15.6 0.85 4.7
7.7 -1.19 -5.8
-3.9-0.38 -3.1
ALL VEHICLES 16 0.17 7.8 3.39 9.9 10.0 2.3 0.24 13.8 0.59 3.3
GRAMS pER MILE
ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON
ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1 : 1 .85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
3-97
-------
TABLE 17 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF 1975 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON
ALL PHASE 1 VEHICLES BEFORE MAINTENANCE
DENVER
AIR PUMP / CONVERTER
1975 & 1976 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 112 VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
NO. OF CYL.
2
4
6
8
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 - 250
251 - 350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799
2800 - 3799
3800 - 4799
4800 - 5799
ALL VEHICLES
2
0
23
6
6
0
6
5
26
6
5
5
21
5
11
15
6
37
HC
MEAN S.D.
0
2
0
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
1
2
1
1
.88
.15
.95
.12
.91
.29
.99
.91
.29
.46
.12
.12
.32
.36
.52
.88
0.2
2.2
0.4
1.4
1.4
0.8
2.1
1.4
0.8
0.9
2.3
1.5
0.7
2.7
0.6
1.9
CO
MEAN S.D.
10.35
53.63
18.01
45.09
37.30
28.43
48.73
37.30
28.43
22.56
54.96
40.56
25.09
60.64
40.76
44.13
1.8
59.0
13.5
23.1
22.4
22.5
57.3
22.4
22.5
15.1
62.0
22.6
17.9
72.5
18.0
49.6
C02
MEAN S.D.
585.7
652.2
672.0
394.8
394.2
532.9
674.7
394.2
532.9
566.7
700.5
393.0
536.2
670.0
776.5
610.1
15.5
97.6
127.7
65.4
64.8
58.5
90.1
64.8
58.5
42.5
78.6
73.0
66.2
64.8
56.9
135.0
NOXC
MEAN S.D.
4.18
1.52
1.97
1.10
1.08
1.27
1.88
1.08
1.27
1.80
1.90
1.12
1.48 j
1.98*
1.71
1.67
3.1
0.5'
0.3
0.4
0.4
0.4
1.0
0.4
0.4
0.7
1.1
0.5
0.6
1.3
0.3
0.9
MPG
MEAN
11.7
11,9
12.6
18.8
19.3
15.3
11.7
19.3
15.3
14,6
11,2
19.1
15.3
11.5
10.5
12.9
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
3-98
-------
TABLE 17 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF 1975 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON
ALL PHASE 1 VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
AIR PUMP / CONVERTER
1975 & 1976 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 112 VEHICLES
NO. OF HC
VEH MEAN S.D.
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
NO. OF CYL.
2
4
6
8
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 - 250
251 - 350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799
2800 - 3799
3800 - 4799
4800 - 5799
ALL VEHICLES
IK&M'
2
0
23
6
6
0
6
5
26
6
5
5
21
5
11
15
6
37
J IN
MTI 1
0.92
1.28
0.95
2.26
2.23
0.96
1.24
2.23
0.96
1.10
1.27
2.41
1.06
1.28
1.25
1.36
GRAMS
?C DC-D
0.2
0.4
0.3
1.9
1.9
0.4
0.4
1.9
0.4
0.2
0.4
2.1
0.3
0.5
0.1
0.9
PER MI
/I AT T ran
CO
MEAN S.D.
10.72
29.87
16.28
42.48
42.05
18.23
27.60
42.05
18.23
13.98
30.84
39.66
19.55
31.51
29.15
28.67
LE
1.9
13.3
10.9
28.4
28.9
9.9
14.2
28.9
9.9
8.5
13.4
30.8
15.0
15.3
7.6
17.7
C02
MEAN S.D.
561.1
702.1
672.8
395.7
379.6
547.4
718.0
379.6
547.4
564.0
754.6
376.7
541.0
745.1
778.4
640.0
1
126
117
102
82
61
106
82
61
37
81
101
61
91
47
161
,4
.8
.9
.1
.1
.6
.7
.1
.6
.5
.3
.7
.2
.0
.5
.7
NOXC
MEAN S.D.
3.83
1.52
2.06
1.06
1.06
1.15
1.90
1.06
1.15
1.76
1.93
1.12
1.39
1.99
1.79
1.66
3.1
0.5
0.6
0.5
0.5
0.4
1.0
0.5
0.4
0.8
1.0
0.5
0.7
1.2
0.4
0.9
MPG
MEAN
15.3
11.8
12.7
18.9
19.6
15.3
11.6
19.6
15.3
15.1
11.0
19.9
15.4
11.1
10.7
12.9
FUEL Pr T LON
'UC.L ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
3-99
-------
TABLE 17 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF 1975 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE EXHAUST EMISSION REDUCTIONS ON
ALL PHASE 1 VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
AIR PUMP / CONVERTER
1975 & 1976 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 112 VEHICLES
FUEL
NO. OF HC CO C02 NOXC ECONOMY
VEH IMPR JIMPR IMPR JIMPR IMPR $IMPR IMPR *IMPR IMPR
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS 2 -0.04 -4.6 -0.37 -3.6 24.6 4.2 0.35 8.4 0.60 i|,i
CHRYSLER 0
FORD 23 0.87 40.6 23.77 44.3 -49.9 -7.6 -0.00 -0.0 -0.15 -1,3
GENERAL MOTORS 6 0.00 0.3 1.74 9.6 -0.8 -0.1-0.09 -4.6 0.04 0.3
IMPORTS 6 -0.13 -6.2 2.61 5.8 -0.9 -0.2 0.04 3.4 0.11 0.6
NO. OF CYL.
2 0
4 6 -0.32 -16.9 -4.75 -12.7 14.6 3.7 0.02 1.5 0.26 1.1
6 5 0.33 25.4 10.20 35.9 -14.5 -2.7 0.12 9.6 0.07 0.1
8 26 0.75 37.7 21.13 43.4 -43.2 -6.4 -0.01 -0.7 -0.12 -1.0
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151 6-0.32-16.9 -4.75 -12.7 14.6 3.7 0.02 1.5 0.26 1.1
151 - 250 5 0.33 25.4 10.20 35.9 -14.5 -2.7 0.12 9.6 0.07 0.1
251 - 350 5 0.36 24.5 8.58 38.0 2.7 0.5 0.04 2.4 0.43 2.9
MORE THAN 350 21 0.85 39.9 24.12 43.9 -54.1 -7.7-0.03 -1.4-0.19 -U
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799 5 -0.28 -13.4 0.90 2.2 16.3 4.1 -0.00 -0.3 0.72 3.8
2800 - 3799 11 0.26 20.0 5.54 22.1 -4.8 -0.9 0.09 5.8 0.13 °-8
3800 - 4799 15 1.07 45.5 29.13 48.0 -75.1 -11.2-0.01 -0.3-0.37 -3-2
4800 - 5799 6 0.27 17.9 11.61 28.5 -1.9 -0.2 -0.08 -4.4 0.22 2.1
ALL VEHICLES 37 0.52 27.6 15.46 35.0 -30.0 -4.9 0.01 0.6 -0.08 -0.6
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
3-100
-------
TABLE 17 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF 1975 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON
ALL PHASE 1 VEHICLES BEFORE MAINTENANCE
DENVER
CONVERTER / NO AIR PUMP
1975 & 1976 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 112 VEHICLES
NO. OF HC
VEH MEAN S.D.
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
NO. OF CYL.
2
4
6
8
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 - 250
251 - 350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799
2800 - 3799
3800 - 14799
4800 - 5799
ALL VEHICLES
IMWff
0
15
1
34
0
0
4
7
39
4
7
21
18
3
11
26
10
50
MTT I
3.32
1.57
2.35
2.70
1.85
2.76
2.70
1.85
2.50
3.06
2.94
2.11
2.66
3.01
2.63
GRAMS
PQ DI?D
1.2
0.0
1.2
1.4
1.1
1.2
1.4
1.1
0.9
1.5
1.6
1.2
1.0
1.7
1.2
CO
MEAN S.D.
74.68
30.19
56.84
63.07
33.47
66.57
63.07
33.47
59.48
74.84
67.12
43.05
62.67
77.84
61.66
33.2
0.0
31.3
33.0
21.0
32.3
33.0
21.0
21.6
40.6
39.2
28.9
26.8
42.4
32.6
C02
MEAN S.D.
557
620
531
336
451
578
336
451
539
623
322
467
555
650
541
.6
.4
.7
.0
.5
.4
.0
.5
.4
.9
.1
.0
.8
.7
.2
92.8
0.0
99.7
28.9
52.4
65.7
28.9
52.4
39.5
61.2
8.8
67.2
46.8
59.3
97.1
NOXC
MEAN S.D.
1.76
2.11
1.52
1.08
2.18
1.56
1.08
2.18
1.52
1.60
1.16
1.83
1.63
1.42
1.61
0.4
0.0.
0.9
0.4
0.4
0.8
0.4
0.4
1.0
0.4
0.4
0.6
0.9
0.4
0.8
MPG
MEAN
12.9
13.2
14.1
20.0
17.4
12.8
20.0
17.4
13.9
11.8
20.3
16.4
13.4
11.3
13.7
PER MILE.
n«r i f\n
FUEL Frnn r ALON
™*.L ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
3-101
-------
TABLE 17 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF 1975 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON
ALL PHASE 1 VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
CONVERTER / NO AIR PUMP
1975 & 1976 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 112 VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
VEHICLE
MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL
IMPORTS
MOTORS
0
15
1
34
0
HC
MEAN S.D.
1.93
1.41
1.67
1.2
0.0
0.8
CO
MEAN S.D.
43.54
26.14
41.92
24.5
0.0
23.6
C02
MEAN S.D.
611.1
631.3
554.0
109.9
0.0
99.7
NOXC
MEAN S.D.
1.57
2.41
1.41
0.6
0.0,
0.8
MPG
MEM
12,9
13.1
11.2
NO. OF CYL.
2
4
6
8
0
4
7
39
1.70
1.31
1.82
0.9
1.0
1.0
35.78
26.00
45.63
11.2
19.0
24.1
359.7
463.3
614.2
30.3
42.4
70.4
1.00
1.92
1.45
0.3
0.5
0.8
21.1
17.5
12.8
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151
251 -
250
350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA
1800 -
2800 -
3800 -
4800 -
WEIGHT
2799
3799
4799
5799
4
7
21
18
3
11
26
10
1.70
1.31
1.55
2.14
1.90
1.34
1.78
2.04
0.9
1.0
0.5
1.3
1.0
0.8
0.9
1.3
35.78
26.00
38.79
53.60
37.87
27.11
42.73
58.17
11.2
19.0
17.3
28.7
12.8
16.2
18.2
3^.7
359.7
463.3
570.0
665.7
354.8
484.5
589.6
691.3
30.3
42.4
31.2
68.7
35.0
70.5
46.6
75.9
1.00
1.92
1.47
1.43
1.02
1.62
1.58
1.20
0.3
0.5
1.0
0.5
0.4
0.6
0.9
0.3
21.1
17.5
11,1
11.7
21.1
16.1
13-'
11.2
ALL VEHICLES
50 1.74 0.9 42.09 23.5 572.7 104.4 1.48 0.8 13."
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
3-102
-------
TABLE 17 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF 1975 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE EXHAUST EMISSION REDUCTIONS ON
ALL PHASE 1 VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
CONVERTER / NO AIR PUMP
1975 & 1976 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 112 VEHICLES
FUEL
NO. OF HC CO C02 NOXC ECONOMY
VEH IMPR *IMPR IMPR ?IMPR IMPR 5&IMPR IMPR $IMPR IMPR $IMPR
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS 0
CHRYSLER 15 1.40 42.0 31. 14 41.7 -53.6 -9.6 0.20 11.1 -0.00 -0.0
FORD 1 0.17 10.5 4.05 13.4 -11.0 -1.8 -0.30 -14.1 -0.08. -0.6
GENERAL MOTORS 34 0.68 29.0 14.92 26.2 -22.3 -4.2 0.11 7.3 0.07 0.5
IMPORTS 0
NO. OF CYL.
2 0
4 4 1.00 37.0 27.29 43.3 -23.7 -7.1 0.08 7.8 1.06 5.3
6 7 0.54 29.0 7.46 22.3 -11.8 -2.6 0.26 12.0 0.06 0.3
8 39 0.94 34.0 20.95 31.5 -35.8 -6.2 0.11 7.0 0.00 0.0
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151 4 1.00 37.0 27.29 43.3 -23.7 -7.1 0.08 7.8 1.06 5.3
151 - 250 7 0.54 29.0 7.46 22.3 -11.8 -2.6 0.26 12.0 0.06 0.3
251 - 350 21 0.95 38.1 20.69 34.8 -30.6 -5.7 0.06 3.7 0.11 0.8
MORE THAN 350 18 0.92 30.1 21.24 28.4 -41.8 -6.7 0.17 10.6-0.09 -0.7
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799 3 1.05 35.6 29.25 43.6 -32.7 -10.2 0.14 12.1 0.80 3.9
2800 - 3799 n Q.77 36.6 15.94 37.0 -17.5 -3.7 0.21 11.2 0.31 1.9
3800 - 4799 26 0.89 33.3 19.94 31.8 -33.7 -6.1 0.06 3.6 0.01 0.1
4800 - 5799 10 0.97 32.2 19.67 25.3 -40.6 -6.2 0.22 15.4 -0.10 -0.8
ALL VEHICLES 50 0.89 33.7 19.57 31.7 -31.5 -5.8 0.13 8.0 0.04 0.3
RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE
m& K^LES PER GALLON
ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
3-103
-------
TABLE 17 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF 1975 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON
ALL PHASE 1 VEHICLES BEFORE MAINTENANCE
DENVER
NO AIR PUMP / NO CONVERTER
1975 & 1976 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 112 VEHICLES
NO. OF HC CO C02 NOXC MPG
VEH MEAN S.D. MEAN S.D. MEAN S.D. MEAN S.D. MEAN
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS 4 2.42 0.3 42.67 18.8 430.2 50.6 2.78 0.8 17.6
CHRYSLER 0
FORD 0
GENERAL MOTORS 0
IMPORTS 5 2.40 0.6 30.84 15.3 317.7 53.2 1.94 0.7 23.1
NO. OF CYL.
2 0
4 5 2.40 0.6 30.84 15.3 317.7 53.2 1.94 0.7 23.?
6 4 2.42 0.3 42.67 18.8 430.2 50.6 2.78 0.8 17.6
8 0
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151 5 2.40 0.6 30.84 15.3 317.7 53.2 1.94 0.7 23.1
151 - 250 2 2.24 0.0 33.54 1.0 391.7 4.8 2.81 0.9 19.1
251 - 350 2 2.60 0.5 51.81 27.0 468.6 41.9 2.75 1.1 15.9
MORE THAN 350 0
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799 5 2.40 0.6 30.84 15.3 317.7 53.2 1.94 0.7 23.?
2800 - 3799 3 2.25 0.0 33.27 0.9 407.5 27.5 3.04 0.8 19.0
3800 - 4799 1 2.95 0.0 70.88 0.0 498.3 0.0 1.98 0.0 14.3
4800 - 5799 0
ALL VEHICLES 9 2.41 0.5 36.10 17.0 367.7 76.8 2.31 0.8 20.5
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
3-104
-------
TABLE 17 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF 1975 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON
ALL PHASE 1 VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
NO AIR PUMP / NO CONVERTER
1975 & 1976 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 112 VEHICLES
NO. OF HC CO C02 NOXC MPG
VEH MEAN S.D. MEAN S.D. MEAN S.D. MEAN S.D. MEAN
MMMvMaMMM_MWMMMMMW^M^M»MM
-------
TABLE 17 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF 1975 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE EXHAUST EMISSION REDUCTIONS ON
ALL PHASE 1 VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
NO AIR PUMP / NO CONVERTER
1975 & 1976 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 112 VEHICLES
FUEL
NO. OF HC CO C02 NOXC ECONOMY
VEH IMPR JIMPR IMPR $IMPR IMPR *IMPR IMPR *IMPR IMPR
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS 4 0.07 2.8 -6.33 -14.8 -32.3 -7.5 0.82 29.5 -1.35 -7.7
CHRYSLER 0
FORD 0
GENERAL MOTORS 0
IMPORTS 5 0.14 6.0 5.46 17.7 -13.1 -4.1 0.04 2.2 -0.26 -1.1
NO. OF CYL.
2 0
4 5 0.14 6.0 5.46 17.7 -13.1 -4.1 0.04 2.2 -0.26 -1.1
6 4 0.07 2.8 -6.33 -14.8 -32.3 -7.5 0.82 29.5-1.35 -7,1
8 0
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151 5 0.14 6.0 5.46 17.7 -13.1 -4.1 0.04 2.2 -0.26 -1,1
151 - 250 2 0.03 1.2 -7.10 -21.2 -50.9 -13,0 1.04 37.1-2.37-12.1
251 - 350 2 0.11 4.2 -5.55 -10.7 -13.7 -2.9 0.60 21.8-0.60 -3.8
MORE THAN 350 0
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799 5 0.14 6.0 5.46 17.7 -13.1 -4.1 0.04 2.2 -0.26 -1,1
2800 - 3799 3 0.17 7.7 -3.38 -10.2 -47.7 -11.7 0.98 32.4-1.92-10.1
3800 - 4799 1-0.25 -8.3 -15.16 -21.4 14.0 2.8 0.32 16.3 -0.24 -1-7
4800 - 5799 0
ALL VEHICLES 9 0.11 4.6 0.22 0.6 -21.6- -5.9 0.39 16.8 -0.95 -^
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
3-106
-------
TABLE 17 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF 1975 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON
ALL FAILED VEHICLES BEFORE MAINTENANCE
DENVER
AIR PUMP / NO CONVERTER
1975 & 1976 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 332 VEHICLES
NO. OF HC CO C02 NOXC MPG
VEH MEAN S.D. MEAN S.D. MEAN S.D. MEAN S.D. MEAN
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS 2 2.18 0.0 44.02 4.3 440.5 29.3 2.23 0.5 17.2
CHRYSLER 0
FORD 2 3.06 1.7 67.15 50.3 478.7 131.0 2.01 0.4 14.9
GENERAL MOTORS 0
IMPORTS 4 2.25 0.4 35.36 9.7 376.1 53.5 1.82 0.7 20.2
NO. OF CYL.
2 0
4 5 2.18 0.4 34.61 8.5 378.1 46.5 1.80 0.6 20.2
6 2 2.18 0.0 44.02 4.3 440.5 29.3 2.23 0.5 17.2
8 1 4.25 0.0 102.69 0.0 571.3 0.0 2.31 0.0 11.9
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151 5 2.18 0.4 34.61 8.5 378.1 46.5 1.80 0.6 20.2
151 - 250 1 2.18 0.0 40.99 0.0 419.8 0.0 1.87 0.0 18.1
251 - 350 1 2.18 0.0 47.05 0.0 461.2 0.0 2.59 0.0 16.4
MORE THAN 350 1 4.25 0.0 102.69 0.0 571.3 0.0 2.31 0.0 11.9
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799 3 2.36 0.4 35.53 11.8 367.2 61.8 1.64 0.8 20.6
2800 - 3799 5 2.48 1.0 51.44 29.3 448.2 74.3 2.17 0.4 16.5
3800 - 14799 0
4800 - 5799 0
ALL VEHICLES 8 2.44 0.8 45.47 24.4 417.8 77.5 1.97 0.6 17.9
FUF?SiSLS!-£ULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE
cuttL tCONOMY IN MILES PER GALI ON
UEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
3-107
-------
TABLE 17 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF 1975 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON
ALL FAILED VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
AIR PUMP / NO CONVERTER
1975 & 1976 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 332 VEHICLES
NO. OF HC CO C02 NOXC MPG
VEH MEAN S.D. MEAN S.D. MEAN S.D. MEAN S.D. MEAI
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS 2 3.00 1.5 108.42 101.2 484.9 99.4 1.42 0.4 13,4
CHRYSLER 0
FORD 2 2.36 0.8 28.61 6.0 533.6 174.2 1.74 0.7 15.1
GENERAL MOTORS 0
IMPORTS 4 2.30 0.3 37.23 8.3 383.8 55.2 2.09 0.8 19.1
NO. OF CYL.
2 0
4 5 2.20 0.4 36.35 7.5 389.1 49.3 1'.93 0.8 19.6
6 2 3.00 1.5 108.42 101.2 484.9 99.4 1.42 0.4 13,*
8 1 2.93 0.0 24.40 0.0 656.8 0.0 2.20 0.0 12.6
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151 5 2.20 0.4 36.35 7.5 389.1 49.3 1.93 0.8 19.6
151 - 250 1 1.94 0.0 36.88 0.0 414.6 0.0 1.74 0.0 18.5
251 - 350 1 4.05 0.0 179/97 0.0 555.2 0.0 1.10 0.0 10.1
MORE THAN 350 1 2.93 0.0 24.40 0.0 656.8 0.0 2.20 0.0 12.6
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799 3 2.39 0.4 37.58 10.2 370.5 59.2 1.95 0.9 20.3
2800 - 3799 5 2.55 0.9 62.05 66.1 492.2 110.1 1.76 0.6 11,8
3800 - 4799 0
4800 - 5799 0
ALL VEHICLES 8 2.49 0.7 52.87 51.8 446.5 109.0 1.83 0.7 16-5
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
3-108
-------
TABLE 17 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF 1975 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE EXHAUST EMISSION REDUCTIONS ON
ALL FAILED VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
AIR PUMP / NO CONVERTER
1975 & 1976 MODEL- YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 332 VEHICLES
FUEL
NO. OF HC CO C02 NOXC ECONOMY
VEH IMPR 5&IMPR IMPR $IMPR IMPR $IMPR IMPR $IMPR IMPR
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS 2-0.82-37.5 -64. 4 -146.3 .-44.4 -10.1 0.81 36.3-3.83-22.3
CHRYSLER 0
FORD 2 0.69 22.7 38.5 57.4 -54.9 -11.5 0.27 13.4 0.20 1.3
GENERAL MOTORS 0
IMPORTS 4-0.05 -2.1 -1.9 -5.3 -7.7 -2.1-0.27 -14.6-0.49 -2.4
NO. OF CYL.
2 0
4 5 -0.02 -1.1 -1.7 -5.0 -11.1 -2.9 -0.13 -7.1 -0.62 -3.1
6 2 -0.82 -37.5 -64.4 -146.3 -44.4 -10.1 0.81 36.3 -3.83 -22.3
8 1 1.32 31.1 78.3 76.2 -85.5 -15.0 0.11 4.9 0.70 5.9
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151 5-0.02 -1.1 -1.7 -5.0 -11.1 -2.9-0.13 -7.1-0.62 -3.1
!51 - 250 1 0.24 11.1 4.1 10.0 5.2 1.2 0.13 7.2 0.47 2.6
251 - 350 1 -1.88 -86.3 -132.9 -282.5 -94.0 -20.4 1.49 57.4 -5.94 -36.3
MORE THAN 350 1 1.32 31.1 78.3 76.2 -85.5 -15.0 0.11 4.9 0.70 5.9
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799 3-0.03 -1.5 -2.1 -5.8 -3.3 -0.9-0.32 -19.3-0.31 -1.5
2800 - 3799 5 _0>07 _2.7 -10.6 -20.6 -43.9 -9.8 0.41 18.8 -1.68 -10.2
3800 - 4799 0
1800 - 5799 0
ALL VEHICLES 8-0.05 -2.2 -7.4 -16.3 -28.7 -6.9 0.14 7.0-1.35 -7.5
RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE
FUEL EPn J?, ££TLES PER GALL°N
UC.L ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
3-109
-------
TABLE 17 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF 1975 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON
ALL FAILED VEHICLES BEFORE MAINTENANCE
DENVER
AIR PUMP / CONVERTER
1975 & 1976 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 332 VEHICLES
NO. OF HC
VEH MEAN S.D.
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL
IMPORTS
MOTORS
0
0
14
1
2
3.49
19.06
3.51
2.6
0.0
1.5
CO
MEAN S.D.
81.56
42.48
62.82
76.2
0.0
4.6
C02
MEAN S.D.
640.6
854.3
363.1
95.7
0.0
127.1
NOXC
MEAN S.D.
1.56
2.75
0.86
0.7
0.0
0.1
MPG
MEAS
11, <
9.0
18.8
NO. OF CYL.
2
4
6
8
0
1
2
14
4.53
2.56
4.67
0.0
0.1
4.9
59.55
42.87
83.19
0.0
32.8
75.0
273.2
459.0
668.4
0.0
8.6
97.3
0.81
0.73
1.72
0.0
0.2
0.7
23.3
16.6
10.9
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151
251 -
250
350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA
1800 -
2800 -
3800 -
4800 -
WEIGHT
2799
3799
4799
5799
1
2
2
12
2
3
9
3
4.53
2.56
4.33
4.72
3.51
3.77
3.57
8.17
0.0
0.1
1.8
5.3
1.5
1.6
3.1
9.5
59.55
42.87
87.20
82.52
62.82
64.68
86.19
71.52
0.0
32.8
67.8
78.9
4.6
61.8
87.5
58.0
273.2
459.0
544.3
689.1
363.1
517.9
666.6
756.6
0.0
8.6
70.5
86.4
127.1
67.6
77.7
88.1
0.81
0.73
1.26
1.79
0.86
1.03
1.82
1.70
0.0
0.2
1.2
0.7
0.1
0.9
0.6
0.9
23.3
16.6
12.8
10.6
18.8
11.1
10.9
9.9
ALL VEHICLES
17 4.41 4.4 77.05 69.5 620.5 143.2 1.55 0.8 1U
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
3-ilO
-------
TABLE 17 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF 1975 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON
ALL FAILED VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
AIR PUMP / CONVERTER
1975 & 1976 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 332 VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL
IMPORTS
NO. OF
2
4
6
8
MOTORS
CYL.
0
0
14
1
2
0
1
2
14
HC
MEAN S.D.
1.77
1.38
3.18
5.28
1.89
1.67
0.9
0.0
3.0
0.0
1.1
0.8
CO
MEAN S.D.
36.93
20.29
43.70
70.94
18.47
36.92
26.1
0.0
38.5
0.0
2.9
26.1
C02
MEAN S.D.
724.9
844.0
392.1
253.0
492.1
752.8
120.9
0.0
196.7
0.0
55.2
95.8
NOXC
MEAN S.D.
1.48
2.03
0.79
0.70
0.72
1.59
0.6
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.2
0.5
MPG
MEAN
11.3
10.1
18.9
23.3
16.8
10.9
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 -
251 -
250
350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA
1800 -
2800 -
3800 -
4800 -
WEIGHT
2799
3799
4799
5799
1
2
2
12
2
3
9
3
5.28
1.89
2.50
1.54
3.18
2.56
1.68
1.11
0.0
1.1
1.8
0.6
3.0
1.3
0.6
0.2
70.94
18.47
55.68
33.79
43.70
43.95
37.56
22.48
0.0
2.9
70.4
16.7
38.5
53.8
16.1
15.3
253.0
492.1
586.0
780.6
392.1
541.7
751.6
867.7
0.0
55.2
24.1
70.0
196.7
78.6
52.8
23.8
0.70
0.72
1.05
1.68
0.79
0.89
1.67
1.71
0.0
0.2
0.9
0.4
0.1
0.7
0.5
0.3
23.3
16.8
13.0
10.6
18.9
14.3
10.9
9.8
ALL VEHICLES
17 1 .91
36.75 25.8 692.7 167.1 1.43 0.6 11.7
FUEL
uau
MlN GRAMS PER MILE
, £ILES PER GALLON
CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
3-111
-------
TABLE 17 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF 1975 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE EXHAUST EMISSION REDUCTIONS ON
ALL FAILED VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
AIR PUMP / CONVERTER
1975 & 1976 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 332 VEHICLES
FUEL
NO. OF HC CO C02 NOXC ECONOMY
VEH IMPR $IMPR IMPR 5&IMPR IMPR $IMPR IMPR *IMPR IMPR
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS 0
CHRYSLER 0
FORD ' 14 1.72 49.4 44.63 54.7 -84.3 -13.2 0.08 4.9 -0.12 -1.1
GENERAL MOTORS 1 17.68 92.8 22.19 52.2 10.3 1.2 0.72 26.2 1.04 11,5
IMPORTS 2 0.33 9.3 19.12 30.4 -29.0 -8.0 0.07 8.4 0.08 0,4
NO. OF CYL.
2 0
4 1 -0.74 -16.4 -11.39 -19.1 20.2 7.4 0.11 13.6 -0.00 -0,0
6 2 0.67 26.2 24.40 56.9 -33.1 -7.2 0.02 2.2 0.23 1,1
8 14 2.99 64.1 46.27 55.6 -84.4 -12.6 0.13 7.5 -0.03 -0,3
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151 1-0.74-16.4-11.39 -19.1 20.2 7.4 0.11 13.6-0.00 -0.0
151 - 250 2 0.67 26.2 24.40 56.9 -33.1 -7.2 0.02 2.2 0.23 1.1
251 - 350 2 1.83 42.3 31.52 36.1 -41.6 -7.6 0.21 16.4 0.26 2.0
MORE THAN 350 12 3.18 67.4 48.73 59.1 -91.5 -13.3 0.12 6.4 -0.06 -0,6
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799 2 0.33 9.3 19.12 30.4 -29.0 -8.0 0.07 8.4 0.08 0.1
2800 - 3799 3 1.20 31.9 20.73 32.1 -23.7 -4.6 0.14 13.4 0.29 2-°
3800 - 4799 9 1.90 53.0 48.63 56.4 -85.0 -12.7 0.16 8.6 -0.03 -0-3
4800 - 5799 3 7.05 86.4 49.04 68.6-111.1 -14.7-0.01 -0.7-0.13 -1-3
ALL VEHICLES 17 2.50 56.7 40.31 52.3 -72.2 -11.6 0.11 7.4 -0.01 -0,1
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
3-112
-------
TABLE 17 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF 1975 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON
ALL FAILED VEHICLES BEFORE MAINTENANCE
DENVER
CONVERTER / NO AIR PUMP
1975 & 1976 MODEL- YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 332 VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
NO. OF CYL.
2
4
6
8
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 - 250
251 - 350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799
2800 - 3799
3800 - 4799
4800 - 5799
ALL VEHICLES
0
29
0
55
0
0
10
7
67
10
7
39
28
8
13
50
13
84
HC
MEAN S.D.
3.78
3.49
2.90
2.91
3.76
2.90
2.91
3.36
4.32
3.06
2.83
3.75
4.04
3.59
1.6
1.4
1.3
0.6
1.5
1.3
0.6
1.3
1.7
1.4
0.7
1.7
1.1
1.5
CO
MEAN S.D.
86.96
86.45
63.88
65.09
92.27
63.88
65.09
84.93
102.50
65.58
67.51
90.33
104.46
86.63
31.2
33.2
20.7
16.5
32.7
20.7
16.5
30.7
33.2
22.9
17.9
33.6
29.8
32.3
C02
MEAN S.D.
538
508
355
404
554
355
404
526
594
347
437
537
630
518
.4
.1
.1
.0
.9
.1
.0
.9
.0
.7
.5
.9
.5
.6
86.6
93.9
38.0
14.9
60.5
38.0
14.9
48.1
54.5
39.1
61.7
50.1
44.3
92.1
NOXC
MEAN S.D.
1.58
1.28
1.03
1.65
1.41
1.03
1.65
1.34
1.51
1.04
1.38
1.41
1.49
1.39
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.8
0.5
0.3
0.8
0.5
0.3
0.3
0.6
0.5
0.3
0.5
MPG
MEAN
12.9
13.5
19.1
17.2
12.5
19.1
17.2
13.2
11.5
19.3
16.1
12.8
11.0
13.3
FUEL
u«-
IN GRAMS PER
J? MLLES PER GALLON
CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
3-113
-------
TABLE 17 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF 1975 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON
ALL FAILED VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
CONVERTER / NO AIR PUMP
1975 & 1976 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 332 VEHICLES
NO. OF HC CO C02 NOXC MPG
VEH MEAN S.D. MEAN S.D. MEAN S.D. MEAN S.D. MEAN
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD '
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
0
29
0
55
0
1.96
2.03
1.0
1.2
48.30
50.16
21.4
28.1
609.5
560.9
112.1
103.0
1.24
1.12
0.5
0.4
12.8
13.7
NO. OF CYL.
2
4
6
8
0
10
7
67
1.95
1.84
2.03
1.4
0.9
1.1
38.62
42.00
51.93
15.3
25.4
26.9
381.6
445.0
620.8
40.8
10.2
69.7
0.91
1.33
1.18
0.2
0.5
0.5
19.8
17.2
12.5
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN
151 -
251 -
MORE THAN
151
250
350
350
10
7
39
28
1.95
1.84
1.72
2.46
1.4
0.9
0.9
1.2
38.62
42.00
45.06
61.50
15.3
25.4
23.7
28.4
381.6
445.0
584.4
671.5
40.8
10.2
43.1
68.5
0.91
1.33
1.15
1.22
0.2
0.5
0.5
0.4
19.8
17.2
13.4
11.1
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 -
2800 -
3800 -
4800 -
2799
3799
4799
5799
8
13
50
13
2.12
1.58
2.02
2.28
1.5
0.8
1.1
1.2
39.96
36.24
51.74
60.13
16.9
20.2
25.1
33.1
376.8
478.9
602.1
705.9
42.7
72.1
51.7
76.4
0.91
1.14
1.17
1.30
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.3
19.9
16.4
12.9
11.0
ALL VEHICLES
84 2.00 1.1 49.52 25.9 577.7 108.0 1.16 0.5 13."
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
3-114
-------
TABLE 17 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF 1975 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE EXHAUST EMISSION REDUCTIONS ON
ALL FAILED VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
CONVERTER / NO AIR PUMP
1975 & 1976 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 332 VEHICLES
FUEL
NO. OF HC CO C02 NOXC ECONOMY
VEH IMPR ZIMPR IMPR *IMPR IMPR *IMPR IMPR *IMPR IMPR *IMPR
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS 0
CHRYSLER 29 1.81 48.0 38.66 44.5 -71.1 -13.2 0.33 21.1 -0.09 -0.7
FORD 0
GENERAL MOTORS 55 1.46 41.9 36.29 42.0 -52.8 -10.4 0.17 13.2 0.19 1.4
IMPORTS 0
NO. OF CYL.
2 0
4 10 0.94 32.5 25.26 39.5 -26.5 -7.5 0.12 11.8 0.69 3.6
6 7 1.07 36.7 23.09 35.5 -40.9 -10.1 0.32 19.6-0.04 -0.2
8 67 1.73 46.1 40.34 43.7 -65.9 -11.9 0.23 16.4 0.05 0.4
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151 10 0.94 32.5 25.26 39.5 -26.5 -7.5 0.12 11.8 0.69 3.6
151 - 250 7 1.07 36.7 23.09 35.5 -40.9 -10.1 0.32 19.6 -0.04 -0.2
251 - 350 39 1.64 48.8 39.87 46.9 -57.5 -10.9 0.19 13.9 0.21 1.6
MORE THAN 350 28 1.86 43.1 41.01 40.0 -77.5 -13.0 0.29 19.5-0.11 -0.9
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799 8 0.94 30.7 25.62 39.1 -29.1 -8.4 0.13 12.1 0.61 3.2
2800 - 3799 13 1>25 44.1 31.27 46.3 -41.4 -9.5 0.24 17.3 0.35 2.2
3800 - 4799 50 1.73 46.0 38.59 42.7 -64.3 -11.9 0.25 17.4 0.03 0.3
4800 - 5799 13 1>?7 n3J 41^33 42.4 -75.3 -11.9 0.20 13.2-0.00 -0.0
ALL VEHICLES 84 1.58 44.1 37.11 42.8 -59.1 -11.4 0.23 16.3 0.09 0.6
^RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE
ECONOMY IN" MILES PER GALLON
ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
3-115
-------
TABLE 17 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF 1975 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON
ALL FAILED VEHICLES BEFORE MAINTENANCE
DENVER
NO AIR PUMP / NO CONVERTER
1975 & 1976 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 332 VEHICLES
NO. OF HC CO C02 NOXC MPG
VEH MEAN S.D. MEAN S.D. MEAN S.D. MEAN S.D. MEAN
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS 7 2.63 0.6 50.16 18.7 414.9 58.4 2.51 0.7 17.7
CHRYSLER 0
FORD ' 0
GENERAL MOTORS 0
IMPORTS 8 3.12 0.6 51.69 20.7 312.8 50.4 1.51 0.7 22,0
NO. OF CYL. n
2 0
4 8 3.12 0.6 51.69 20.7 312.8 50.4 1.51 0.7 22,0
6 7 2.63 0.6 50.16 18.7 414.9 58.4 2.51 0.7 17.7
8 0
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151 8 3.12 0.6 51.69 20.7 312.8 50.4 1.51 0.7 22.0
151 - 250 4 2.62 0.8 43.00 13.0 378.4 45.0 2.56 0.7 19.5
251 - 350 3 2.65 0.4 59.71 23.5 4.63.7 30.9 2.45 0.9 15.7
MORE THAN 350 0
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799 7 2.91 0.3 49.01 20.8 306.2 50.6 1.58 0.8 22,6
r
2800 - 3799 7 2.86 0.9 50.11 18.6 395.0 48.1 2.38 0.9 I8-4
3800 - 4799 1 2.95 0.0 70.88 0.0 498.3 0.0 1.98 0.0 lU
4800 - 5799 0
ALL VEHICLES 15 2.89 0.6 50.98 19.1 360.4 74.3 1.98 0.9 19-7
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
3-116
-------
TABLE 17 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF 1975 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON
ALL FAILED VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
NO AIR PUMP / NO CONVERTER
1975 & 1976 MODEL- YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 332 VEHICLES
NO. OF HC CO C02 NOXC MPG
VEH MEAN S.D. MEAN S.D. MEAN S.D. MEAN S.D. MEAN
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS 7 2.52 0.6 48.21 18.3 438.6 52.3 1.95 0.5 17.0
CHRYSLER 0
/
FORD 0
GENERAL MOTORS 0
IMPORTS 8 2.44 0.4 36.02 14.8 358.2 58.3 1.57 0.6 21.0
NO. OF CYL.
2 0
4 8 2.44 0.4 36.02 14.8 358.2 58.3 1.57 0.6 21.0
6 7 2.52 0.6 48.21 18.3 438.6 52.3 1.95 0.5 17.0
8 0
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151 8 2.44 0.4 36.02 14.8 358.2 58.3 1.57 0.6 21.0
151 - 250 4 2.58 0.7 42.28 3.2 407.5 49.6 1.86 0.5 18.4
251 - 350 3 2.44 0.7 56.12 28.8 480.0 4.4 2.06 0.5 15.4
MORE THAN 350 0
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799 7 2.39 0.4 34.12 14.9 343.7 44.7 1.51 0.6 21.9
2800 - 3799 7 2.47 0.6 42.97 8.1 435.1 49.5 1.99 0.5 17.4
3800 - 14799 1 3.19 0.0 86.04 0.0 484.3 0.0 1.65 0.0 14.1
4800 - 5799 0
ALL VEHICLES 15 2.48 0.5 41.71 17.1 395.7 67.8 1.74 0.6 18.9
, IN GRAMS PER MILE
Itf MILES PER GALLON
ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
3-117
-------
TABLE 17 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF 1975 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE EXHAUST EMISSION REDUCTIONS ON
ALL FAILED VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
NO AIR PUMP / NO CONVERTER
1975 & 1976 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 332 VEHICLES
FUEL
NO. OF HC CO C02 NOXC ECONOMY
VEH IMPR JIMPR IMPR 5&IMPR IMPR 5&IMPR IMPR *IMPR IMPR JflMPR
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS 7 0.11 4.1 1.95 3.9 -23.7 -5.7 0.57 22.5-0.69 -3.9
CHRYSLER 0
FORD ' 0
GENERAL MOTORS 0
IMPORTS 8 0.68 21.7 15.67 30.3 -45.4 -14.5-0.05 -3.4-0.97 -4,1)
NO. OF CYL.
2 0
4 8 0.68 21.7 15.67 30.3 -45.4 -14.5-0.05 -3.4-0.97 -M
6 7 0.11 4.1 1.95 3.9 -23.7 -5.7 0.57 22.5-0.69 -3.9
8 0
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151 8 0.68 21.7 15.67 30.3 -45.4 -14.5-0.05 -3.4-0.97 -U
151 - 250 4 0.03 1.3 0.72 1.7 -29.1 -7.7 0.70 27.3 -1.13 -5.8
251 - 350 3 0.21 7.9 3.59 6.0 -16.4 -3.5 0.39 15.9 -0.27 -1.8
MORE THAN 350 0
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799 7 0.52 17.9 14.89 30.4 -37.5 -12.2 0.07 4.3 -0.70 -3.1
2800 - 3799 7 0.40 13.8 7.14 14.2 -40.1 -10.1 0.39 16.5 -0.99 -5."
3800 - 4799 1 -0.25 -8.3 -15.16 -21.4 14.0 2.8 0.32 16.3 -0.24 -1,7
4800 - 5799 0
ALL VEHICLES 15 0.41 14.2 9.27 18.2 -35.3 -9.8 0.24 12.0 -0.82 -1*.1
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
3-118
-------
3 7.2 Hot Start Federal Test Procedure Results
Hot Start FTP emission and fuel economy results for the Denver
Inspection/Maintenance Evaluation Task vehicles are summarized on the
thirty-six pages comprising Table 18 which follows.
These data are further summarized below where HC, CO, C02 and NOX
emissions are presented in grains per mile. Any discrepancies which
may appear in these summarized data are due to mathematical rounding
of certain of the data.
3-119
-------
Summary of Hot Start FTP Results
73 Passed 1975/1976 Model Phase I
Condition
As-Rec'd
After Mtce.
Improvement
Improvement (%)
HC
1.46
1.25
0.20
14.0
CO
32.59
26.40
6.18
19.0
C02
^•^•^^^B
528.2
542.2
-14.0
- 2.7
Vehicles
NOX
1.67
1.59
0.09
5.1
Summary of Hot Start FTP Results
22
Condition
As-Rec ' d
After Mtce.
Improvement
Improvement (%)
Passed 1974 Model
HC
4.77
4.34
0.43
9.0
CO
72.17
57.00
15.17
21.0
Phase I Vehicles
C02
501.7
527.0
-25.3
- 5.1
NOX
1.86
1.93
-0.06
-3.5
Summary of Hot Starts FTP Results
16
Condition
As-rec'd
After Mtce.
Improvement
Improvement (%)
Passed 1973 Model
HC
3.65
3.48
0.17
4.7
CO
62.55
46.08
16.48
26.3
Phase I Vehicles
C02
•••••MOM!
554.8
573.4
-18.6
- 3.4
NOX
2.06
2.15
-0.09
-4.4
Summary of Hot Start FTP Results
14
Condition
As-rec'd
After Mtce.
Improvement
Improvement (%)
Passed 1972 Model
HC
4.11
3.78
0.34
8.2
CO
62.03
58.16
3.87
6.2
Phase I Vehicles
C02
493.2
521.3
-28.1
- 5.7
NOx
3.01
2.84
0.17
5.7
mpg
15.2
15.1
-0.10
-0.6
mpg
14.1
14.1
0.00
0.0,
13.4
13.5
0.16
1.2
npg
14.7
14.2
-0.49
-3.4
3-120
-------
Condition
Summary of Hot Start FTP Results
112 (All) 1975/1976 Model Phase I Vehicles
As-Rec'd
After Mtce.
Improvement
Improvement (%)
HC
2.02
1.43
0.58
28
CO
45.72
31.26
14.46
31.6
cr>2
509.4
533.9
-24.5
- 4.8
NOX
1.65
1.55
0.10
6.2
15.1
15.1
0.00
0.0
Summary of Hot Start FTP Results
30 (All) 1974 Model Phase I Vehicles
Condition
As-Rec'd
After Mtce.
Improvement
Improvement (%)
HC
CO
C02
NOx
4.60
4.18
0.42
9.2
75.27
58.28
17.00
22.6
479.6
505.9
-26.3
- 5.5
1.80
1.82
-0.02
-0.9
14.5
14.5
0.04
0.3
Summary of Hot Start FTP Results
27
Condition
As-Rec'd
After Mtce.
Improvement
Improvement (%)
(All) 1973 Model Phase I Vehicles
HC
4.14
3.71
0.43
10.5
CO
72.27
48.86
23.40
32.4
C02
•^••^•M
479.7
504.6
-24.9
- 5.2
N0y
2.05
2.10
-0.05
-2.4
14.6
15.0
0.33
2.2
Summary of Hot Start FTP Results
25 (All) 1972 Model Phase I Vehicles
Condition
As-Rec'd
After Mtce.
Improvement
Improvement C%)
HC
5.96
3.72
2.24
37.6
CO
75.89
51.83
24.06
31.7
C02
450.7
493.7
-42.9
- 9.5
NOX
2.75
2.67
0.08
3.0
15.1
15.1
0.05
0.3
3-121
-------
Summary of Hot Start FTP Results
124 Failed 1975/1976 Model Phase I and II Vehicles
Condition HC CO C02 NOX mpg
As-Rec'd 3.15 72.85 483.0 1.45 14.6
After Mtce. 1.73 42.43 536.4 1.23 14.6
Improvement 1.43 30.42 -53.4 0.22 -0.03
Improvement (%) 45.1 41.8 -11.1 15.0 -0.2
Summary of Hot Start FTP Results
31 Failed 1974 Model Phase I and II Vehicles
Condition
As-Rec'd
After Mtce.
Improvement
Improvement (%)
HC
5.18
4.45
0.73
14.1
CO
82.64
59.48
23.16
28.0
C02
•««••••
421.5
462.9
-41.5
- 9.8 v
NOx
1.77
1.61
0.17
9.5
Summary of Hot Start FTP Results
50 Failed 1972 Model Phase I and II Vehicles
Condition
As-Rec'd
After Mtce.
Improvement
Improvement (%)
HC
6.36
4.40
1.97
30.9
CO
83.64
51.79
31.84
38.1
C02
^^•^•m
401.3
445.7
-44.5
-11.1
NOx
2.39
2.33
0.06
2.4
mpg
15.6
15.6
-0.08
-0.5
Summary of Hot Start FTP Results
53 Failed 1973 Model Phase I and II Vehicles
Condition HC CO C02 NOX
As-Rec'd 5.73 88.47 425.2 1.71 15.2
After Mtce. 4.66 58.62 462.3 1.71 15.6
Improvement 1.07 29.84 -37.1 -0.01 0.35
Improvement (%) 18.7 33.7 - 8.7 -0.5 2.3
16.1
16.4
0.35
2.2
3-122
-------
TABLE 18
SUMMARY OF 1972 HOT START TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON PHASE 1
PASSED VEHICLES BEFORE MAINTENANCE
DENVER
1975 & 1976 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 112 VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
NO. OF CYL.
2
1J
6
8
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 - 250
251 - 350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799
2800 - 3799
3800 - 4799
4800 - 5799
ALL VEHICLES
2
5
20
27
19
2
17
11
43
19
11
19
24
17
19
27
10
73
HC
MEAN S.D.
0.58
2.04
1.52
1.26
1.62
1.28
1.61
1.12
1.49
1.57
1.12
1.60
1.41
1.64
1.15
1.57
1.43
1.46
0.1
1.1
0.7
0.7
0.6
0.3
0.6
0.6
0.8
0.6
0.6
0.8
0.8
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.7
0.7
CO
MEAN S.D.
3.55
40.02
39.55
31-96
27.26
8.92
29-50
20.18
38.08
27-33
20.18
37.72
38.37
26.07
21.62
40.87
42.13
32.59
0.6
17.9
20.9
24.2
15.3
0.7
14.4
10.7
23.8
15.0
10.7
24.7
23-6
12.6
16.8
23.9
21.9
21.2
C02
MEAN S.D.
567
529
602
553
409
855
341
471
601
395
471
531
656
396
482
579
701
528
.6
.8
.9
.1
.6
.2
.3
.7
.3
.4
.7
.9
.3
.7
.3
.1
.7
.2
19.8
104.8
108.1
90.1
193-8
311.6
54.4
58.3
84.7
185.2
58.3
42.6
67.4
196.1
66.2
69.7
55.3
146.8
NOXC
MEAN S.D.
4.38
1.51
1.46
1.71
1.62
0.63
1.74
1.73
1.68
1.62
1.73
1.52
1.81
1.65
1.66
1.74
1.54
1.67
2.9
0.5
0.5
1.0
0.9
0.0
0.9
0.6
1.1
1.0
0.6
1.1
1.1
1.0
0.7
1-3
0.4
1.0
MPG
MEAN
15.4
14.8
13.2
14.6
19.4
10.2
22.6
17.5
13-3
20.0
17.5
14.9
12.3
20.0
17.1
13.7
11.5
15.2
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON * *
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
3-123
-------
TABLE 18 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF 1972 HOT START TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON PHASE 1
PASSED VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
1975 & 1976 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 112 VEHICLES
NC
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
NO. OF CYL.
2
4
6
8
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 - 250
251 - 350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799
2800 - 3799
3800 - 4799
4800 - 5799
). OF
VEH
2
5
20
27
19
2
17
11
43
19
11
19
24
17
19
27
10
HC
MEAN
0.62
1.40
1.15
0.93
1.84
3.76
1.61
0.92
1.08
1.84
0.92
1.07
1.09
1.94
0.93
1.05
1.23
i
'S.D.
0.2
0.7
0.3
0.5
1.4
3.4
0.9
0.6
0.4
1.4
0.6
0.4
0.4
1.4
0.6
0.4
0.3
C
MEAN
4.88
30.54
27-25
25.50
27.97
24.31
28.03
19.52
27.62
27.64
19-52
26.29
28.67
27.41
18.76
28.29
34.14
0
S.D.
0.8
21.5
11.3
17.2
16.8
17.5
17.2
15.0
15.6
16.8
15.0
17.3
14.4
15.6
16.0
15.4
13.4
0
MEAN
546.0
560.2
645.8
568.2
391.3
-v,
567.4
353.0
480.8
631.6
375.5
480.8
547.2
698.5
370.4
493.0
617.3
725.4
02
S.D
5
130
131
94
112
76
59
65
99
89
65
39
80
93
64
98
47
*
.3
.5
.5
.1
.1
.4
.9
.1
.9
.9
.1
.8
.2
.3
.3
.3
.2
NC
MEAN
4.10
1.46
1.56
1.60
1.38
0.71
1.44
1.55
1.70
1.36
1.55
1.43
1.91
1.39
1.48
1.81
1.53
)XC
S.D.
3-3
0.5
0.6
1.0
0.6
0.1
0.6
0.6
1.1
0.6
0.6
1.1
.1.1
0.6
0.7
1.3
0.5
MPG
MEAN
16.0
14.5
12.8
14.5
20.1
14.1
22.1
17-3
13-1
20.9
17-3
15.0
11.9
21.2
16.9
13-3
11.3
ALL VEHICLES
73 1.25 0.9 26.40 15.9 542.2 145,3 1.59 0.9
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
3-124
-------
TABLE 18 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF 1972 HOT START TEST PROCEDURE EXHAUST EMISSION REDUCTIONS
ON PHASE 1 PASSED VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
1975 & 1976 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 112 VEHICLES
FUEL
NO. OF HC CO C02 NOXC ECONOMY
VEH IMPR $IMPR IMPR *IMPR IMPR JIMPR IMPR *IMPR IMPR *IMPR
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS 2 -0.04 -6.7 -1.34 -37-7 21.6 3-8 0.28 6.5 0.54 3-5
CHRYSLER 5 0.64 31.3 9.47 23-7 -30.4 -5.7 0.05 3-5-0.33 -2.2
FORD 20 0.37 24.2 12.30 31.1 -42.8 -7.1 -0.10 -7.1 -0.43 -3-2
GENERAL MOTORS 27 0.32 25.8 6.46 20.2 -15.1 -2.7 0.11 6.4-0.09 -0.6
IMPORTS 19 -0.23 -14.0 -0.71 -2.6 18.3 4.5 0.24 14.8 0.72 3-7
NO. OF CYL.
2 2-2.49-195-15.39-172.4 287.9 33.7-0.07 -11.4 4.21 41.4
1 17 -0.00 -0.1 1.46 5-0 -11.7 -3-4 0.30 17.4 -0.53 -2.3
6 11 0.20 18.0 0.66 3-3 -9.1 -1.9 0.18 10.3 -0.25 -1.4
8 43 0.41 27-6 10.46 27.5 -30.3 -5.0-0.02 -0.9-0.25 -1.8
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151 19-0.26-16.8 -0.31 -1.1 19-8 5.0 0.26 16.2 0.87 4.4
151 - 250 11 0.20 18.0 0.66 3-3 -9-1 -1.9 0.18 10.3 -0.25 -1.4
251 - 350 19 0.53 33-3 11.43 30.3 -15.2 -2.9 0.09 6.2 0.11 0.7
MORE THAN 350 24 0.32 22.5 9.70 25.3 -42.2 -6.4-0.10 -5.6-0.43 -3.5
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799 17-0.30-18.3 -1.34 -5.1 26.4 6.6 0.26 15.6 1.11 5-6
2800 - 3799 19 o.22 18.9 2.86 13.2 -10.8 -2.2 0.18 11.0 -0.18 -1.1
3800 - 4799 27 0.51 32.8 12.59 30.8 -38.2 -6.6 -0.06 -3.6 -0.35 -2.5
4800 - 5799 10 0.20 13.8 7-99 19.0 -23-7 -3.4 0.01 0.8 -0.16 -1.3
ALL VEHICLES 73 0.20 14.0 6.18 19.0 -14.0 -2.7 0.09 5.1-0.10 -0.6
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE
pUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON
ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
3-125
-------
TABLE 18 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF 1972 HOT START TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON PHASE 1
PASSED VEHICLES BEFORE MAINTENANCE
DENVER
1974 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 30 VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
HC
MEAN S.D.
CO
MEAN S.D.
C02
MEAN S.D.
NOXC
MEAN S.D.
MPG
MEAN
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD '
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
1
2
5
11
3
4.91
7.48
4.36
4.14
5.88
0.0
3.1
0.7
0.9
2.4
57.61
97.75
70.32
70.66
68.57
0.0
82.8
29.4
23-5
11.9
457.7
454.1
487.3
574.9
303.8
0.0
73.0
123.1
71.1
114.8
2.80
1.62
1.94
1.99
1.11
0.0
1.4
0.7
1.1
0.5
15.?
14.1
14.5
12.?
20.6
NO. OF CYL.
2
M
6
8
1
3
1
17
8.50
4.30
2.83
4.74
0.0.
0.8
0.0
1.5
81.80
57.52
50.18
75.48
0.0
8.4
0.0
31.8
436.4
257.1
438.7
552.4
0.0
34.1
0.0
76.3
0.57
1.55
1.58
2.01
0.0
0.3
0.0
1.0
15.0
24.6
16.9
12.9
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN
151 -
251 -
MORE THAN
151
250
350
350
4
1
12
5
5-35
2.83
5.01
4.10
2.2
0.0
1.7
0.5
63.59
50.18
85.68
50.99
13.9
0.0
30.8
19-2
302.0
438.7
522.9
623.2
93.8
0.0
58.3
71.3
1.31
1.58
1.69
2.77
0.6
0.0
0.8
1.0
21.2
16.9
13-2
12.1
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 -
2800 -
3800 -
4800 -
2799
3799
4799
5799
4
3
12
3
5.35
4.14
4.85
4.27
2.2
1.1
1.7
0.6
63.59
75.07
77.42
59.68
13-9
36.9
30.1
40.6
302.0
452.7
541.4
658.2
93.8
12.3
58.0
45.0
1.31
1.77
1.76
3.07
0.6
1.0
0.8
1.2
21.2
15.2
13-1
11.6
ALL VEHICLES
22 4.77 1.6 72.17 29.0 501.7 124.8 1.86 0.9 1*-1
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
3-126
-------
TABLE 18 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF 1972 HOT START TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON PHASE 1
PASSED VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
197*1 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 30 VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
NO. OF CYL.
2
4
6
8
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 - 250
251 - 350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799
2800 - 3799
3800 - 4799
4800 - 5799
ALL VEHICLES
1
2
5
11
3
1
3
1
17
4
1
12
5
4
3
12
3
22
HC
MEAN S.D.
4.71
4.17
4.02
4.22
5.30
7.76
3.90
2.64
4.31
4.87
2.64
4.48
3.91
4.87
3.93
4.30
4.21
4.34
0.0
0.3
0.8
1.3
2.1
0.0
0.3
0.0
1.0
1.9
0.0
1.1
0.8
1.9
1.1
1.1
0.9
1.2
CO
MEAN S.D.
49
54
60
57
51
69
42
40
59
49
40
65
45
49
55
62
46
57
.78
.19
.75
.91
.67
.35
.70
.42
.77
.36
.42
.86
.16
.36
.60
.52
.49
.00
0.0
22.1
21.7
31.3
16.9
0.0
7.1
0.0
27.0
14.5
0.0
26.2
25.8
14.5
18.8
30.4
16.5
24.9
C02
MEAN S.D.
507.5
520.8
498.9
598.5
322.7
468.1
260.2
421.0
583.8
312.2
421.0
559.8
641.5
312.2
460.6
582.7
657.4
527.0
0.0
38.2
139.6
73.0
125.9
0.0
17.8
0.0
64.4
104.9
0.0
58.0
38.4
104.9
43-7
48.0
31.5
129.1
NOXC
MEAN S.D.
3.21
1.81
1.85
2.04
1.29
0.52
1.77
1.52
2.06
1.46
1.52
1.83
2.61
1.46
2.07
1.65
3-50
1.93
0.0
0.6
0.7
1.2
0.7
0.0
0.2
0.0
1.0
0.6
0.0
0.9
1.2
0.6
1.0
0.8
0.5
1.0
MPG
MEAN
14.8
14.3
14.6
12.6
21.1
14.8
26.1
18.0
12.8
21.9
18.0
13.1
12.2
21.9
15.8
12.8
11.9
14.1
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE
FUEL ECONOMY Iti MILES PER GALLON
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
3-127
-------
TABLE 18 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF 1972 HOT START TEST PROCEDURE EXHAUST EMISSION REDUCTIONS
ON PHASE 1 PASSED VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
197^ MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 30 VEHICLES
FUEL
NO. OF HC CO C02 NOXC ECONOMY
VEH IMPR JIMPR IMPR 5&IMPR IMPR *IMPR IMPR $IMPR IMPR
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS 1 0.20 4.0 7.83 13-6 -49.7 -10.9 -0.41 -14.5 -0.96 -6.1
CHRYSLER 2 3-31 44.3 43.56 44.6 -66.7 -14.7 -0.19 -11.4 0.28 2.0
FORD ' 5 0.34 7.7 9.57 13-6 -11.6 -2.4 0.09 4.5 0.11 0.?
GENERAL MOTORS 11-0.07 -1.8 12.75 18.0 -23-6 -4.1-0.05 -2.5 -0.07 -0.5
IMPORTS 3 0.58 9-9 16.89 24.6 -18.9 -6.2 -0.18 -15.9 0.46 2.2
NO. OF CYL.
2 1 0.73 8.6 12.45 15.2 -31-7 -7-3 0.05 8.1 -0.24 -1.6
4 3 0.40 9.4 14.82 25.8 -3.1 -1.2 -0.22 -14.0 1.56 6.3
6 1 0.19 6.6 9.76 19.5 17.7 4.0 0.05 3-3 1.15 6.8
8 17 0.43 9.1 15.71 20.8 -31.4 -5.7 -0.05 -2.6 -0.10 -0.8
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151 4 0.49 9-1 14.23 22.4 -10.2 -3.4 -0.15 -11.6 0.72 3-1
151 - 250 1 0.19 6.6 9.76 19-5 17.7 4.0 0.05 3-3 1-15 6.8
251 - 350 12 0.53 10.5 19.83 23.1 -36.9 -7.1 -0.14 -8.2 -0.08 -0.6
MORE THAN 350 5 0.20 4.8 5.83 11.4 -18.2 -2.9 0.16 5.7 -0.14 -1.2
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799 4 0.49 9.1 14.23 22.4 -10.2 -3.4 -0.15 -11.6 0.72 3-1
2800 - 3799 3 0.21 5.1 19.47 25.9 -7.8 -1.7 -0.31 -17.3 0.64 4.2
3800 - 4799 12 0.56 11.5 14.91 19.3 -41.3 -7.6 0.11 6.5 -0.30 -2-3
4800 - 5799 3 0.05 1.3 13.19 22.1 0.8 0.1 -0.43 -13-9 0.34 2.9
ALL VEHICLES 22 0.43 9-0 15.17 21.0 -25-3 -5.T -0.06 -3-5 -0.00 -0-0
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
3-128
-------
TABLE 18 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF 1972 HOT START TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON PHASE 1
PASSED VEHICLES BEFORE MAINTENANCE
DENVER
1973 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 27 VEHICLES
NO. OF HC
VEH MEAN S.D.
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
NO. OF CYL.
2
4
6
8
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 - 250
251 - 350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799
2800 - 3799
3800 - 4799
^800 - 5799
0
1
2
11
2
0
2
1
13
2
1
6
7
1
3
10
2
2.76
4.82
3.67
2.87
2.87
2.76
3.84
2.87
2.76
3.81
3-87
3.71
2.72
3-90
3.79
0.0
0.5
0.8
1.2
1-2
0.0
0.9
1.2
0.0
0.7
1.0
0.0
0.7
1.0
0.2
CO
MEAN S.D.
34.68
84.56
62.93
52.42
52.42
34.68
66.26
52.42
34.68
64.05
68.15
60.68
52.81
61.49
83.42
0.0
16.8
17.1
11.7
11.7
0.0
18.3
11.7
0.0
12.5
23.0
0.0
23.7
17.8
12.9
C02
MEAN S.D.
372
557
609
345
345
372
601
345
372
546
648
264
429
592
699
.7
.5
.0
.1
.1
.7
.1
.1
.7
.0
.3
.1
.4
.5
.8
0.0
15.8
90.0
114.4
114.4
0.0
84.5
114.4
0.0
54.0
78.9
0.0
58.4
75-3
45.1
NOXC
MEAN S.D.
4.47
1.55
1.98
1.84
1.84
4.47
1.91
1.84
4.47
1.75
2.05
1.66
2.49
2.10
1.42
0.0
0.9
1.1
0.3
0.3
0.0
1.1
0.3
0.0
0.9
1.3
0.0
1.8
1.2
0.0
MPG
MEAN
20.4
12.6
12.3
20.3
20.3
20.4
12.4
20.3
20.4
13.5
11.6
23.9
17.0
12.7
10.5
ALL VEHICLES 16 3.65 0.9 62.55 18.8 554.8 128.5 2.06 1.2 13-4
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON
FUEL EC°NOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
3-129
-------
TABLE 18 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF 1972 HOT START TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON PHASE 1
PASSED VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
1973 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 27 VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD '
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
NO. OF CYL.
2
4
6
8
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 - 250
251 - 350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799
2800 - 3799
3800 - 4799
4800 - 5799
ALL VEHICLES
0
1
2
11
2
0
2
1
13
2
1
6
7
1
3
10
2
16
HC
MEAN S.D.
2.53
3.99
3.59
2.87
2.87
2.53
3-65
2.87
2.53
3-38
3-89
3.89
2.28
3.64
4.28
3.48
0.0
0.2
1.0
1.4
1.4
0.0
1.0
1.4
0.0
0.7
1.2
0.0
0.4
0.8
1.9
1.0
CO
MEAN S.D.
34
57
46
40
40
34
47
40
34
45
49
51
42
43
60
46
.15
.89
.07
.23
.23
.15
.89
.23
.15
.56
.89
.24
.22
.93
.01
.08
0.0
6.7
14.4
15.6
15.6
0.0
14.0
15.6
0.0
13.6
15.1
0.0
18.4
13-6
1.5
13.8
C02
MEAN S.D.
396.2
628.2
623.0
334.5
33^.5
396.2
623.8
334. 5
396.2
572.9
667.4
254.2
455.9
613.1
711.0
573.4
0.0
70.3
66.6
113.5
113-5
0.0
64.1
113.5
0.0
27,4
52.9
0.0
87.8
53.8
49.6
126.7
NOXC
MEAN S.D.
3.22
2.25
2.12
1.73
1.73
3.22
2.14
•
1.73
3.22
1.85
2.38
1.73
2.02
2.30
1.85
2.15
0.0
0.9
1.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.1
0.0
0.0
0.7
1.3
0.0
1.1
1.2
0.2
T.O
MPG
MEAN
19.1
12.1
12.6
21.8
21.8
19-1
12.5
21.8
19-1
13-5
11.1
25-6
16.8
12.8
1Q.8
13-5
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
3-130
-------
TABLE 18 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF 1972 HOT START TEST PROCEDURE EXHAUST EMISSION REDUCTIONS
ON PHASE 1 PASSED VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
1973 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 27 VEHICLES
FUEL
NO OF HC CO C02 NOXC ECONOMY
VEH IMPR fclMPR IMPR $IMPR IMPR $IMPR IMPR £EMPR IMPR *IMPR
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS 0
CHRYSLER 1 0.23 8.4 0.52 1.5 -23.6 -6.3 1.26 28.1 -0.98 -4.8
FORD 2 0.83 17-3 26.67 31-5 -70.7 -12.7 -0.70 -45.0 -0.45 -3-6
GENERAL MOTORS 11 0.08 2.1 16.85 26.8 -14.0 -2.3-0.14 -7.2 0.22 1.8
IMPORTS 2 0.00 0.1 12.19 23-3 10.6 3-1 0.11 6.1 1.49 7-3
NO. OF CYL.
2 0
4 2 0.00 0.1 12.19 23-3 10.6 3-1 0.11 6.1 1.49 7-3
6 1 0.23 8.4 0.52 1.5 -23-6 -6.3 1.26 28.1 -0.98 -4.8
8 13 0.19 5-0 18.36 27.7 -22.7 -3-8 -0.23 -11.9 0.12 1.0
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151 2 0.00 0.1 12.19 23-3 10.6 3-1 0.11 6.1 1.49 7-3
151 - 250 1 0.23 8.4 0.52 1.5 -23.6 -6.3 1.26 28.1 -0.98 -4.8
251 - 350 6 0.44 11.5 18.49 28.9 -26.9 -4.9 -0.11 -6.1 0.07 0.5
MORE THAN 350 7-0.02 -0.5 18.25 26.8 -19.1 -2.9-0.33 -16.1 0.15 1.3
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799 1 -0.18 -4.8 9.44 15.6 9-9 3-8 -0.08 -4.6 1.67 7.0
2800 - 3799 3 0.44 16>1 10>58 20 0 _26i6 _6-2 0 4? 19.0 -0.28 -1.6
3800 - 4799 10 0.26 6.6 17-56 28.6 -20.5 -3-5-0.20 -9.3 0.14 1.1
4800 - 5799 2-0.50-13.2 23-41 28.1 -11.2 -1.6-0.43 -30.3 0,31 2.9
ALL VEHICLES 16 0.17 4.7 16.48 26.3 -18.6 -3.4-0.09 -4.4 0.16 1.2
RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE
ECONOMY IN kCLES PER GALLON
ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
3-131
-------
TABLE 18 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF 1972 HOT START TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON PHASE 1
PASSED VEHICLES BEFORE MAINTENANCE
DENVER
1972 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 25 VEHICLES
NO. OF HC
VEH MEAN S.D.
CO
MEAN S.D.
C02
MEAN S.D.
NOXC MPG
MEAN S.D. MEAN
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD '
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
NO. OF CYL.
2
4
6
8
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 - 250
251 - 350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799
2800 - 3799
3800 - 4799
4800 - 5799
ALL VEHICLES
0
1 3.88
5 4.13
6 4.33
2 3.54
0
3 3-49
1 3.44
10 4.37
3 3.49
1 3.44
4 4.53
6 4.26
4 3.48
4 3.93
5 4.87
1 3-58
0.0 45.21 0.0 475.9 0.0 3-52 0.0 15.9
0.8 51.37 16.5 536.8 111.7 3.94 0.6 14.1
1.2 80.46 28.0 531.3 102.0 2.43 1.8 13.2
0.3 41.83 3.9 278.3 23.7 2.15 1.0 25.0
0.2 45.44 6.8 310.8
0.0 47.13 0.0 345.5
1.0 68.50 28.2 562.7
0.2 45.44 6.8 310.8
0.0 47.13 0.0 345.5
1.4 70.45 28.4 503.2
0.7 67.20 30.7 602.3
0.2 45.86 5.6 319.4
0.5 57.77 16.2 507.6
1.1 66.89 28.8 585.0
0.0 119.44 0.0 671.5
58.7 1-92 0.8 22.6
0.0 3-53 0.0 20.6
63.7 3.28 1.5 13.0
58.7 1.92
0.0 3.53
30.6 2.30
45.0 3.94
50.9 2.32
38.2 2.78
37.7 4.06
0.0 1.43
0.8 22.6
0.0 20.6
0.8 14.1
1.6 12.3
1.1 22.0
1.1 14.5
1.5 12-6
0.0 10-2
14 4.11 0.9 62.03 25.9 493.2 128.1 3.01 1.4
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
3-132
-------
TABLE 18 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF 1972 HOT START TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON PHASE 1
PASSED VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
1972 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 25 VEHICLES
NO. OF HC
VEH MEAN S.D.
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
NO. OF CYL.
2
4
6
8
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 - 250
251 - 350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799
2800 - 3799
3800 - 4799
4800 - 5799
ALL VEHICLES
0
1
5
6
2
0
3
1
10
3
1
4
6
4
4
5
1
14
4.13
3.29
4.08
3.89
3.69
3.08
3.87
3.69
3.08
4.15
3.69
3.54
3.74
3.80
4.75
3.78
0.0
0.6
0.8
0.1
0.3
0.0
0.8
0.3
0.0
0.9
0.8
0.4
0.4
1.1
0.0
0.7
CO
MEAN S.D.
69.57
42.31
74.07
44.35
46.31
37.30
63.80
46.31
37.30
56.84
68.45
44.06
46.50
50.92
197.44
58.16
0.0
17.1
61.6
14.4
10.7
0.0
49.7
10.7
0.0
16.3
65.0
9-9
17-7
18.8
0.0
42.6
C02
MEAN S.D.
466.9
580.6
566.0
266.4
301.9
359.5
603.3
301.9
359.5
533.9
649.6
316.3
526.0
642.9
714.6
521.3
0
136
116
13
62
0
80
62
0
52
60
58
43
47
0
153
.0
.3
.1
.0
.2
.0
.8
.2
.0
.6
.6
.4
.5
.3
.0
.0
NOXC
MEAN S.D.
2.91
3.59
2.44
2.11
1.78
4.80
2.96
1.78
4.80
2.29
3.40
2.54
2.40
3.78
1.04
2.84
0.0
1.1
1.9
1.4
1.2
0.0
1.5
1.2
0.0
0.5
1.8
1.8
0.6
1.6
0.0
1.5
MPG
MEAN
15.1
13.5
12.8
25.5
23-0
20.7
12.4
23.0
20.7
13-9
11.5
22.4
14.5
12.1
8.5
14.2
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE
FUEL ECONOMY Itf MILES PER GALLON
ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
3-133
-------
TABLE 18 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF 1972 HOT START TEST PROCEDURE EXHAUST EMISSION REDUCTIONS
ON PHASE 1 PASSED VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
1972 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 25 VEHICLES
FUEL
NO. OF HC CO C02 NOXC ECONOMY
VEH IMPR JIMPR IMPR JIMPR IMPR $IMPR IMPR *IMPR IMPR "
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS 0
CHRYSLER 1 -0.25 -6.5 -24.36 -53.9 9.0 1.9 0.61 17-4 -0.81 -5.1
FORD ' 5 0.83 20.2 9.06 17-6 -43.8 -8.2 0.35 8.8 -0.58 -4.1
GENERAL MOTORS 6 0.25 5.7 6.38 7.9 -34.6 -6.5 -0.00 -0.0 -0.45 -3.1
IMPORTS 2 -0.34 -9-7 -2.53 -6.0 12.0 4.3 0.04 1.7 0.49 2.0
NO. OF CYL.
2 0
4 3 -0.20 -5.8 -0.87 -1.9 8.9 2.9 0.13 6.9 0.40, 1.8
6 1 0.36 10.6 9.83 20.9 -14.1 -4.1 -1.26 -35.8 0.12 0.6
8 10 0.50 11.4 4.69 6.9 -40.6 -7.2 0.33 10.0 -0.57 -M
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151 3 -0.20 -5.8 -0.87 -1.9 8.9 2.9 0.13 6.9 0.40 1.8
151 - 250 1 0.36 10.6 9.83 20.9 -14.1 -4.1 -1.26 -35.8 0.12 0.6
251 - 350 4 0.38 8.5 13.61 19-3 -30.7 ' -6.1 0.02 0.7 -0.18 -1.3
MORE THAN 350 6 0.57 13-4 -1.25 -1.9 -47-3 -7.8 0.54 13.6 -0.76 -6.2
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799 4 -0.06 -1.8 1.81 3.9 3-1 1.0 -0.22 -9.3 0.32 1-5
2800 - 3799 4 0.19 4.8 11.27 19.5 -18.4 -3.6 0.37 13.4 -0.00 -0.0
3800 - 4799 5 1.08 22.1 15.98 23.9 -58.0 -9.9 0.28 6.9 -0.50 -W
4800 - 5799 1-1.17-32.7-78.00-65.3 -43.1 -6.4 0.39 27.5 -1.66-16-3
ALL VEHICLES 14 0.34 8.2 3-87 6.2 -28.1 -5.7 0.17 5.7 -0.49 -^
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
3-134
-------
TABLE 18 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF 1972 HOT START TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON ALL PHASE 1
VEHICLES BEFORE MAINTENANCE
DENVER
1975 & 1976 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 112 VEHICLES
NO. OF HC
VEH MEAN S.D.
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
NO. OF CYL.
2
4
6
8
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 - 250
251 - 350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799
2800 - 3799
3800 - 4799
4800 - 5799
ALL VEHICLES
6
15
25
40
26
2
27
17
66
29
15
29
39
27
26
43
16
112
1.68
2.87
2.09
1.81
1.85
1.28
1.88
1.62
2.20
1.83
1.53
1.91
2.42
1.95
1.49
2.25
2.37
2.02
0.9
1.1
2.4
1.3
0.7
0.3
0.7
0.9
1.8
0.7
0.9
0.9
2.2
0.7
0.9
1.9
1.6
1.5
CO
MEAN S.D.
23.47
67.03
52.44
46.00
31.66
8.92
33.91
30.35
55.63
32.18
29.34
43-94
63.41
33.84
27.97
56.73
65.04
45.72
19.3
33.7
59.0
35.7
19.2
0.7
17.1
22.8
47.0
17.7
23.3
26.2
56.0
20.7
22.6
49.0
43.5
39.8
C02
MEAN S.D.
468
533
606
524
388
855
335
446
586
371
445
520
628
371
466
568
655
509
.1
.7
.7
.0
.8
.2
.5
.2
.3
.4
.1
.9
.3
.2
.0
.1
.6
.4
87.4
90.1
100.7
103.5
170.4
311.6
51.1
65.0
81.8
154.4
68.0
48.9
74.8
160.0
75.3
73.1
79.7
140.2
NOXC
MEAN S.D.
3.36
1.73
1.51
1.50
1.59
0.63
1.62
1.94
1.62
1.55
1.81
1.59
1.71
1.57
1.79
1.69
1.47
1.65
1.7
0.5
0.5
0.9
0.9
0.0
0.9
0.8
1.0
0.9
0.7
1.1
0.9
0.9
0.8
1.1
0.4
0.9
MPG
MEAN
17.4
13-7
12.8
14.7
20.0
10.2
22.5
17.8
13-0
20.7
17-9
14.9
12.1
20.6
17.2
13.4
11.6
15.1
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON
FUEL EC°NOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
3-135
-------
TABLE 18 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF 1972 HOT START TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON ALL PHASE 1
VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
1975 & 1976 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 112 VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
HC
MEAN S.D.
CO
MEAN S.D.
C02
MEAN S.D.
NOXC
MEAN S.D.
MPG
MEAN
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD '
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
6
15
25
40
26
1.49
1.53
1.23
1.19
1.94
0.7
1.0
0.4
0.8
1.2
21.63
40.45
29.23
32.55
28.17
16.4
26.9
16.9
24.1
16.6
481.9
586.6
655.1
544.5
382.8
57.4
106.7
123.5
105.7
106.4
2.78
1.54
1.55
1.44
1.44
1.8
0.7
0.5
0.9
0.6
17.0
13.6
12.6
11.8
20.5
NO. OF CYL.
2
4
6
8
2
27
17
66
3.76
1.74
1.13
1.32
3-4.
0.9
0.7
0.7
24.31
29.22
20.77
35.01
17.5
15.7
14.5
23.9
567.4
347.2
472.8
625.1
76.4
56.6
57.7
94.9
0.71
1.43
1.61
1.61
0.1
0.6
0.6
1.0
14.1
22.3
17-1
13-0
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN
151
251 -
MORE THAN
151
250
350
350
29
15
29
39
1.88
1.03
1.19
1.44
1.2
0.7
0.5
0.9
28.88
19.80
28.51
39.50
15.5
14.0
19.6
25.5
362.4
472.3
540.6
680.3
80.1
61.2
40.6
82.5
1.38
1.51
1.54
1.71
0.6
0.5
1.0
0.9
21.5
17-5
15-1
11.9
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 -
2800 -
3800 -
4800 -
2799
3799
4799
5799
27
26
43
16
1.95
1.06
1.31
1.50
1.2
0.6
0.7
0.9
28.30
19.89
35.25
44.04
15.2
15.7
21.1
28.6
364.2
483.2
612.3
692.3
86.7
67.7
95.0
75.1
1.40
1.50
1.73
1.41
0.6
0.6
1.1
0.5
2M
17-1
13-2
11.6
ALL VEHICLES
112 1.43 0.9 31.26 21.2 533-9 143.4 1.55 0.9
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
3-136
-------
TABLE 18 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF 1972 HOT START TEST PROCEDURE EXHAUST EMISSION REDUCTIONS
ON ALL PHASE 1 VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
1975 & 1976 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 112 VEHICLES
FUEL
NO. OF HC CO C02 NOXC ECONOMY
VEH IMPR $IMPR IMPR $IMPR IMPR *IMPR IMPR $IMPR IMPR $IMPR
17.3 -0.34 -2.0
10.5 -0.14 -1.0
-2.8 -0.16 -1.3
3.8 0.06 0.4
9.5 0.52 2.6
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
NO. OF CYL.
2
6
15
25
40
26
2
0
1
0
-0
-2
.19
.34
0.87
.62
.09
.49 -'
11
46
41
34
-4
1 95
1.84
26.59
23.21
13-46
3-49
-15-39
7.9
39.7
44.3
29.3
11.0
-172.4
-13.8
-52.9
-48.3
-20.5
6.0
287.9
-3-0
-9-9
-8.
-3-9
1.6
33.7
0
0
.58
.18
17
10
0 -0.04 -i
0
0
-0
.06
.15
.07
3
9
-11
4 27 0.13 7 4.69 13-8 -11.7 -3-5 0.20 12.1 -0.22 -1.0
6 17 0.49 30 9-58 31.6 -26.6 -6.0 0.32 16.6 -0.35 -2.0
8 66 0.89 40 20.61 37.1 -38.7 -6.6 0.01 0.7 -0.07 -0.5
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151 29-0.05 -2 3-30 10.3 9.0 2.4 0.18 11.4 0.70 3.4
151 - 250 15 0.49 32 9.55 32.5 -27.2 -6.1 0.30 16.7 -0-37 -2.1
251 - 350 29 0.72 37 15.44 35.1 -19.7 -3-8 0.06 3.6 0.17 1.2
MORE THAN 350 39 0.99 40 23-91 37.7 -52.0 -8.3 0.00 0.1-0.18 -1.5
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799 27 -0.00 -0 5.54 16.4 7.0 1.9 0.17$ 10.8 0.78 3.8
2800 - 3799 26 0.43 29 8.08 28.9 -17.2 -3.7 0.29 16.2 -0.10 -0.6
3800 - 4799 43 0.94 41 21.48 37.9 -44.3 -7-8-0.04 -2.3-0.15 -1.1
4800 - 5799 16 0.87 36 21.00 32.3 -36.6 -5.6 0.06 4.3 -0.01 -0.1
ALL VEHICLES 112 0.58 28 14.46 31.6 -24.5 -4.8 0.10 6.2 0.00 0.0
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE
FUEL ECONOMY INTCLES PER GALLON
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
3-137
-------
TABLE 18 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF 1972 HOT START TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON ALL PHASE 1
VEHICLES BEFORE MAINTENANCE
DENVER
1974 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 30 VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
VEHICLE
MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD '
GENERAL
IMPORTS
MOTORS
1
4
7
13
5
HC
MEAN S.D.
4.91
5.59
4.59
4.12
5.04
0.0
2.8
1.1
1.0
2.1
CO
MEAN S.D.
57.61
82.60
81.66
76.63
60.48
0.0
51.8
38.2
32.7
14.3
C02
MEAN S.D.
457.7
415.9
487.3
561.6
310.8
0.0
62.3
123.7
102.9
82.3
NOXC
MEAN S.D.
2.80
1.78
1.85
1.94
1.18
0.0
1.0
0.6
1.0
0.5
MPG
MEAN
15.?
15.8
11,1
12.8
21.0
NO. OF CYL.
2
4
6
8
1
6
4
19
8.50
3.85
3-51
4.87
0.0-
0.9
0.5
1.4
81.80
54.99
64.03
83.70
0.0
8.1
13.6
38.8
436.4
287.4
389.1
561.6
0.0
40.6
36.1
77.6
0.57
1.56
1.67
1.97
0.0
0.5
0.6
1.0
15.0
23.0
17-7
12.5
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 -
251 -
250
350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA
1800 -
2800 -
3800 -
4800 -
WEIGHT
2799
3799
4799
5799
7
4
12
7
7
6
12
5
4.51
3.51
5.01
4.63
4.51
3.94
4.85
4.94
1.9
0.5
1.7
1.0
1.9
0.8
1.7
1.1
58.82
64.03
85.68
80.31
58.82
71.86
77.42
97.25
12.5
13.6
30.8
52.6
12.5
24.8
30.1
59.0
308.7
389.1
522.9
627.9
308.7
412.7
541.4
650.8
67.4
36.1
58.3
60.9
67.4
46.0
58.0
38.6
1.42
1.67
1.69
2.45
1.42
1.74
1.76
2.51
0.6
0.6
0.8
1.0
0.6
0.8
0.8
1.2
21.1
17-T
13-2
11.5
21.1
16.5
13-1
10.8
ALL VEHICLES
30 4.60 1.5 75.27 33.4 479.6 131.9 1.80 0.9 11*-5
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
3-138
-------
TABLE 18 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF 1972 HOT START TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON ALL PHASE 1
VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
1974 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 30 VEHICLES
NO. OF HC
VEH MEAN S.D.
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
NO. OF CYL.
2
4
6
8
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 - 250
251 - 350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799
2800 - 3799
3800 - 4799
4800 - 5799
ALL VEHICLES
1
4
7
13
5
1
6
4
19
7
4
12
7
7
6
12
5
30
4.71
3.76
4.01
4.11
4.84
7.76
3.77
3.14
4.34
4.34
3.14
4.48
4.09
4.34
3.62
4.30
4.35
4.18
0.0
0.5
0.8
1.2
1.7
0.0
0.8
0.3
0.9
1.7
0.3
1.1
0.7
1.7
0.8
1.1
0.7
1.1
CO
MEAN S.D.
49
56
63
60
48
69
46
56
62
49
56
65
55
49
58
62
60
58
.78
.30
.04
.78
.39
.35
.03
.17
.01
.36
.17
.86
.41
-36
.51
.52
.31
.28
0.0
17-9
18.2
30.1
15.5
0.0
11.8
16.8
26.6
13-9
16.8
26.2
28.1
13.9
15.9
30.4
23.5
23.2
C02
MEAN S.D.
507.5
471.7
511.7
582.7
325.1
468.1
289.1
419.7
594.5
314.7
419.7
559.8
653.9
314.7
439.9
582.7
668.4
505.9
0.0
60.9
138.5
112.0
89.9
0.0
37.1
5.1
68.7
75.7
5.1
58.0
38.3
75.7
35.9
48.0
27.8
138.2
NOXC
MEAN S.D.
3.21
1.73
1.77
1.96
1.31
0.52
1.61
1.43
2.03
1.45
1.43
1.83
2.39
1.45
1.74
1.65
2.83
1.82
0.0
0.5
0.7
1.1
0.6
0.0
0.4
0..5
1.0
0.5
0.5
0.9
1.1
0.5
0.8
0.8
1.0
0.9
MPG
MEAN
14.8
15-5
14.2
12.8
21.3
14.8
23-8
17-1
12.6
21.9
17.1
13-1
11.8
21.9
16.3
12.8
11.4
14.5
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE
F"EL ECONOMY IN" MILES PER GALLON : *
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
3-139
-------
TABLE 18 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF 1972 HOT START TEST PROCEDURE EXHAUST EMISSION REDUCTIONS
ON ALL PHASE 1 VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
1974 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 30 VEHICLES
FUEL
NO. OF HC CO C02 NOXC ECONOffi
VEH IMPR *IMPR IMPR 5&IMPR IMPR *IMPR IMPR *IMPR IMPR
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS 1 0.20 4.0 7-83 13-6 -T9.7 -10.9 -0.41 -14.5 -0.96 -6.1
CHRYSLER 4 1.83 32.7 26.29 31.8 -55.8 -13.4 0.05 3.0 -0.24 -1.5
FORD ' 7 0.58 12.6 18.62 22.8 -24.4 -5.0 0.08 4.3 0.15 1.1
GENERAL MOTORS 13 0.01 0.3 15.85 20.7 -21.1 -3.8-0.01 -0.7 0.07 0.6
IMPORTS 5 0.20 4.0 12.09 20.0 -14.3 -4.6 -0.13 -11.1 0.27 1.3
*---'
NO. OF CYL.
2 1 0.73 8.6 12.45 15.2 -31.7 -7-3 0.05 8.1 -0.24 -1.6
4 6 0.08 2.0 8.96 16.3 -1.8 -0.6 -0.05 -3.0 0.77 3-1
6 4 0.37 .10.4 7.86 12.3 -30.6 -7.9 0.24 14.5 -0.58 -3-3
8 . 19 0.53 10.9 21.70 25.9 -32.9 -5.9 -0.06 -3.2 0.05 0.1
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151 7 0.17 3.8 9.46 16.1 -6.0 -2.0 -0.03 -2.4 0.49 2.3
151 - 250 4 0.37 10.4 7.86 12.3 -30.6 -7.9 0.24 14.5 -0.58 -3-3
251 - 350 12 0.53 10.5 19.83 23.1 -36.9 -7.1 -0.14 -8.2 -0.08 -0.6
MORE THAN 350 7 0.53 11.5 24.90 31.0 -25.9 -4.1 0.06 2.6 0.23 2.0
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799 7 0.17 3-8 9.46 16.1 -6.0 -2.0 -0.03 -2.4 0.49 2.3
2800 - 3799 6 0.32 8.1 13-35 18.6 -27.3 -6.6 0.00 0.0 -0.16 -1.0
3800 - 4799 12 0.56 11.5 14.91 19.3 -41.3 -7.6 0.11 6.5-0.30 -2-3
4800 - 5799 5. 0.58 11.8 36.95 38.0 -17.6 -2.7 -0.32 -12.8 0.59 5-1
ALL VEHICLES 30 0.42 9.2 17.00 22.6 -26.3 -5.5 -0.02 -0.9 0.04 0.3
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
3-140
-------
TABLE 18 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF 1972 HOT START TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON ALL PHASE 1
VEHICLES BEFORE MAINTENANCE
DENVER
1973 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 27 VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
NO. OF CYL.
2
4
6
8
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 - 250
251 - 350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799
2800 - 3799
3800 - 4799
4800 - 5799
ALL VEHICLES
1
3
6
12
5
0
7
3
17
7
3
8
9
6
6
13
2
27
HC
MEAN S.D.
3.02
3-94
5.06
3.79
4.20
4.14
3.42
4.26
4.14
3.42
4.06
4.45
4.49
3.44
4.35
3-79
4.14
0.0
1.0
2.1
0.9
2.2
1.9
0.9
1.4
1.9
0.9
0.8
1.9
1.8
1.1
1.6
0.2
1.5
CO
MEAN S.D.
35
83
103
63
56
59
57
80
59
57
74
85
62
65
78
83
72
.79
.73
.17
.69
.18
.54
.75
.07
.54
.75
.39
.12
.11
.68
.28
.42
.27
0.0
42.8
42.3
16.5
19.4
17.0
39.0
34.6
17.0
39.0
22.3
43.6
17.1
31.2
39.4
12.9
32.1
C02
MEAN S.D.
377.9
382.9
469.2
583.7
321.1
312.5
350.4
571.4
312.5
350.4
521.6
615.6
293.5
398.0
569.5
699.8
479.7
0.0
87.9
113-3
122.6
65.9
56.4
43.2
95.4
56.4
43.2
65.8
98.6
28.4
63.6
82.3
45.1
146.4
NOXC
MEAN S.D.
6.05
2.98
1.74
1.93
1.39
1.47
4.39
1.88
1.47
4.39
1.64
2.10
1.37
2.83
2.11
1.42
2.05
0.0
1.4
0.8
1.1
0.4
0.4
1.7
1.0
0.4
1.7
0.8
1.1
0.4
2.1
1.0
0.0
1.3
MPG
MEAN
20.0
16.8
13.7
12.8
21.0
21.2
19.6
12.5
21.2
19.6
13-6
11.6
21.9
17.3
12.6
10.5
14.6
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE
FUEL ECONOMY IN* MILES PER GALLON
ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
3-141
-------
TABLE 18 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF 1972 HOT START TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON ALL PHASE 1
VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
1973 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 27 VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
HC
MEAN S.D.
CO
MEAN S.D.
C02
MEAN S.D.
NOXC
MEAN S.D.
MPG
MEAN
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
1
3
6
12
5
2.80
2.95
4.07
3.70
3.92
0.0
0.4
1.2
1.1
2.4
28.59
45.08
59.48
47.70
45.25
0.0
9.5
20.3
14.8
17.0
423.3
423.2
530.1
596.8
318.1
0.0
87.0
132.4
110.9
60.3
2.42
3.06
2.26
2.04
1.41
0.0
0.6
0.9
1.1
0.4
18.6
17.6
13.9
13.0
22.1
NO. OF CYL.
2
4
6
8
0
7
3
17
3.86
2.78
3.80
2.0
0.2
1.0
46.46
37.98
51.77
16.8
11.8
16.8
312.7
390.8
603.7
50.4
35.5
69.5
1.58
3.08
2.14
0.6
0.6
1.0
22.3
19-3
12.7
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN
151 -
251 -
MORE THAN
151
250
350
350
7
3
8
9
3.86
2.78
3-55
4.03
2.0
0.2
0.8
1.3
46.46
37.98
47.83
55.27
16.8
11.8
12.5
20.0
312.7
390.8
557.2
645.1
50.4
35.5
37.7
65.7
1.58
3.08
1.80
2.45
0.6
0.6
0.7
1.2
22.3
19-3
13-8
11.9
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 -
2800 -
3800 -
4800 -
2799
3799
4799
5799
6
6
13
2
4.20
2.91
3.76
4.28
2.0
1.0
0.9
1.9
49.34
44.32
49.03
60.01
16.4
15.6
18.5
1.5
295.7
440.6
598.9
711.0
24.8
74.2
56.5
49.6
1.56
2.16
2.37
1.85
0.7
1.1
1.0
0.2
23-0
17-1
12.9
10.8
ALL VEHICLES
27
3-71 1.3 48.86 16.4 504.6 146.6 2.10 1.0 15-°
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
3-142
-------
TABLE 18 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF 1972 HOT START TEST PROCEDURE EXHAUST EMISSION REDUCTIONS
ON ALL PHASE 1 VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
1973 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 27 VEHICLES
FUEL
NO. OF HC CO C02 NOXC ECONOMY
VEH IMPR *IMPR IMPR 5&IMPR IMPR JIMPR IMPR JIMPR IMPR $IMPR
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS 1 0.22 7.4 7.20 20.1 -45.4 -12.0 3-63 60.0 -1.40 -7.0
CHRYSLER 3 0.98 25.0 38.65 46.2 -40.4 -10.5 -0.08 -2.6 0.79 4.7
FORD 6 0.99 19.6 43.70 42.4 -60.9 -13.0-0.53 -30.2 0.24 1.7
GENERAL MOTORS 12 0.10 2.5 16.00 25.1 -13-0 -2.2-0.12 -6.1 0.23 1.8
IMPORTS 5 0.28 6.6 10.92 19.4 3-0 0.9 -0.03 -2.1 1.10 5.2
NO. OF CYL.
2 0
4 7 0.28 6.7 13.08 22.0 -0.2 -0.1 -0.12 -8.0 1.13 5.3
6 3 0.64 18.8 19.77 34.2 -40.5 -11.6 1.32 30.0 -0.32 -1.6
8 17 0.46 10.8 28.30 35.3 -32.4 -5.7 -0.26 -13.9 0.24 1.9
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151 7 0.28 6.7 13.08 22.0 -0.2 -0.1-0.12 -8.0 1.13 5.3
151 - 250 3 0.64 18.8 19.77 34.2 -40.5 -11.6 1.32 30.0 -0.32 -1.6
251 - 350 8 0.51 12.5 26.56 35-7 -35-6 -6.8 -0.16 -9.8 0.16 1.2
MORE THAN 350 9 0.42 9.4 29.85 35.1 -29.5 -4.8-0.35 -16.7 0.29 2.5
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799 6 0.29 6.5 12.77 20.6 -2.1 -0.7 -0.19 -13-6 1.07 4.9
2800 - 3799 5 0.54 15.6 21.36 32.5 -42.6 -10.7 0.67 23.7 -0.24 -1.4
3800 - 4799 13 0.59 13.6 29.25 37.4 -29.4 -5.2 -0.26 -12.2 0.34 2.7
^800 - 5799 2 -0.50 -13.2 23.41 28.1 -11.2 -1.6 -0.43 -30.3 0.31 2.9
VEHICLES 27 0.43 10.5 23.40 32.4 -24.9 -5.2 -0.05 -2.4 0.33 2.2
RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE
ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON
ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
3-143
-------
TABLE 18 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF 1972 HOT START TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON ALL PHASE 1
VEHICLES BEFORE MAINTENANCE
DENVER
1972 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 25 VEHICLES
NO. OF HC
VEH MEAN S.D.
VEHICLE
MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD '
GENERAL
IMPORTS
*.
MOTORS
1
3
6
11
4
29.76
7.63
4.21
4.94
4.16
0.0
3.8
0.7
1.2
0.8
CO
MEAN S.D.
99.02
127.12
53.25
84.01
43-31
0.0
70.9
15.5
26.2
9.8
C02
MEAN S.D.
295.3
402.6
494.6
507.1
304.7
0.0
117.5
143.8
88.4
53.4
NOXC
MEAN S.D.
1.57
2.33
3-94
2.59
2.03
0.0
1.0
0.6
1.4
0.6
MPG
MEAN
16.3
11.2
15.0
13.6
23.0
NO. OF CYL.
2
4
6
8
0
6
3
16
4.11
14.91
4.97
0.7
13.5
1.3
48.09
104.37
80.97
11.0
60.1
36.1
313.0
302.6
530.1
52.2
39.7
74.5
2.25
2.25
3.03
1.0
1.1
1.4
22.1
17.3
13-2
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 -
251 -
250
350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA
1800 -
2800 -
3800 -
4800 -
WEIGHT
2799
3799
4799
5799
6
2
8
9
7
9
8
1
4.11
7.48
8.13
4.92
7.54
5.50
5.39
3-58
0.7
5.7
8.8
1.3
9.8
2.5
1.3
0.0
48.09
107-05
85.16
79.25
54.07
83.87
80.57
119.44
11.0
84.7
28.7
41.7
21.9
41.2
42.1
0.0
313.0
306.3
449.8
575.5
305.2
441.1
561.3
671.5
52.2
55.4
75.7
59.3
40.4
84.4
51.0
0.0
2.25
2.60
2.16
3.65
2.41
2.33
3.69
1.43
1.0
1.3
0.7
1.4
1.0
0.9
1.4
0.0
22.1
17.8
111.6
12.1
21.1
15.0
12.6
10.2
ALL VEHICLES
25 5-96 5.3 75.89 38.1 450.7 125.9 2.75 1-3 15>1
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
3-144
-------
TABLET 18 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF 1972 HOT START TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON ALL PHASE 1
VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
1972 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 25 VEHICLES
N(
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
NO. OF CYL.
2
4
6
8
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 - 250
251 - 350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799
2800 - 3799
3800 - 11799
1800 - 5799
3. OF
VEH
1
3
6
11
4
0
6
3
16
6
2
8
9
7
9
8
1
H(
MEAN
2.63
3-83
3.12
3.83
4.48
3.91
3.16
3-75
3.91
3.42
3.63
3-73
3-35
3.81
3.81
4.75
1
'S.D.
0.0
0.3
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.2
0.6
0.8
1.2
0.5
0.9
0.7
0.8
0.8
0.9
0.0
C
MEAN
36.66
58.29
41.22
61.07
41.29
41.86
44.53
56.94
41.86
48.47
50.07
60.78
40.84
46.83
48.87
197.44
:0
S.D.
0.0
12.0
15.5
46.5
9.1
8.4
13-1
39-9
8.4
15.8
14.8
52.7
8.0
13.6
14.7
0.0
ME
369
459
535
563
293
310
362
587
310
358
510
630
317
489
624
714
C
AN
.7
.5
.8
.9
.8
.0
.3
.2
.0
.5
.8
.9
.9
.6
.3
.6
02
S.D.
0.0
98.5
164.1
87.5
47.6
48.6
6.5
70.7
48.6
1.5
66.7
58.3
49.2
77.9
48.0
0.0
NI
MEAN
2.03
2.86
3.31
2.57
1.98
1.83
3.07
2.91
1.83
3.60
2.24
3.41
2.27
2.29
3.64
1.04
OXC
S.D.
0.0
0.4
1.2
1.5
0.8
0.7
1.5
1.3
0.7
1.7
0.6
1.4
1.3
0.7
1.3
0.0
MPG
MEAN
20.4
15.8
14.5
13.2
23.8
22.9
20.1
12.9
22.9
19.9
14.8
12.0
22.6
15.4
12.4
8.5
VEHICLES 25 3-72 0.8 51.83 32.7 493-7 141.6 2.67 1.3 15.1
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE
ECONOMY IN'MILES PER GALLON
ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
3-145
-------
TABLE 18 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF 1972 HOT START TEST PROCEDURE EXHAUST EMISSION REDUCTIONS
ON ALL PHASE 1 VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
1972 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 25 VEHICLES
FUEL
NO. OF HC CO C02 NOXC ECONOMY
VEH IMPR *IMPR IMPR *IMPR IMPR JIMPR IMPR *IMPR IMPR
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS 1 27.13 91.2 62.36 63.0 -74.4 -25.2 -0.46 -29.4 4.10 25.2
CHRYSLER 3 3-79 49.8 68.83 54.1 -56.9 -14.1 -0.53 -22.7 1.59 11.2
FORD 6 1.10 26.0 12.02 22.6 -41.2 -8.3 0.62 15.9 -0.46 -3.1
GENERAL MOTORS 11 1.11 22.5 22.95 27.3 -56.8 -11.2 0.02 0.6-0.35 -2.6
IMPORTS 4 -0.32 -7.8 2.02 4.7 10.9 3-6 0.05 2.5 0.80 3.5
NO. OF CYL.
2 0
4 6 0.20 4.8 6.23 13.0 3.0 1.0 0.42 18.8 0.76 3.5
6 3 11.75 78.8 59.84 57-3 -59.7 -19.7 -0.82 -36.4 2.80 16.2
8 16 1.22 24.6 24.04 29.7 -57.0 -10.8 0.12 4.1 -0.29 -2.2
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151 6 0.20 4.8 6.23 13.0 3.0 1.0 0.42 18.8 0.76 3-5
151 - 250 2 4.05 54.2 58.58 54.7 -52.3 -17.1 -1.00 -38.5 2.11 11.8
251 - 350 8 4.50 55.4 35.09 41.2 -61.1 -13.6 -0.08 -3.8 0.20 1.1
MORE THAN 350 9 1.19 24.1 18.47 23.3 -55.4 -9.6 0.24 6.6-0.38 -3-1
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799 7 4.18 55.5 13.22 24.5 -12.7 -4.2 0.14 5.8 1.17 5.1
2800 - 3799 9 1.70 30.9 37-04 44.2 -48.5 -11.0 0.04 1.6 0.39 2.6
3800 - 4799 8 1.58 29.3 31-70 39.3 -63-1 -11.2 0.04 1.2 -0.15 -1-2
4800 - 5799 1-1.17-32.7-78.00 -65.3 -43.1 -6.4 0.39 27.5-1-66-16-3
ALL VEHICLES 25 2.24 37.6 24.06 31.7 -42.9 -9.5 0.08 3.0 0.05 °-3
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
3-146
-------
TABLE 18 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF 1972 HOT START TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON ALL
FAILED VEHICLES BEFORE MAINTENANCE
DENVER
1975 & 1976 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 332 VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
NO. OF CYL.
2
4
6
8
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 - 250
251 - 350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799
2800 - 3799
3800 - 4799
4800 - 5799
ALL VEHICLES
9
29
16
56
14
0
24
18
82
24
14
45
41
20
28
60
16
124
HC
MEAN S.D.
2.41
3.31
3.06
3.35
2.60
2.50
2.59
3.47
2.50
2.64
2.85
4.04
2.58
2.61
3.27
4.39
3.15
0.4
1.6
2.8
2.2
0.7
1.0
0.6
2.3
1.0
0.6
1.1
3-0
0.8
0.9
1.9
3.6
2.0
CO
MEAN S.D.
43.69
80.34
72.01
79.91
48.79
48.48
54.63
83.98
48.48
55.46
73.79
92.03
51.86
55.23
82.75
92.81
72.85
19.5
32.5
74.1
32.9
24.3
20.4
24.0
43.4
20.4
24.1
31.9
51.6
22.2
25.3
45.6
39.3
40.5
C02
MEAN S.D.
404.1
516.3
592.1
488.8
317.3
325.7
398.0
547.7
325.7
385.5
499.1
590.7
319.6
418.1
529.7
625.9
483.0
49
86
105
99
56
47
40
78
47
33
50
78
' 49
67
67
77
115
.7
.7
.0
.0
.0
.2
.4
.1
.2
.2
.4
.9
.1
.7
.8
.6
.5
NOXC
MEAN S.D.
2.41
1.56
1.56
1.22
1.38
1.25
1.86
1.42
1.25
1.71
1.38
1.56
1.19
1.64
1.44
1.48
1.45
0.7
0.6
0.6
0.5
0.7
0.6
0.9
0.6
0.6
0.8
0.7
0.5
0.6
0.9
0.6
0.4
0.6
MPG
MEAN
18.5
13.6
12.4
14.2
22.1
21.7
18.0
12.9
21.7
18.5
14.2
11.9
21.7
17.3
13-2
11.3
14.6
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON
FUEL EC°NOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
3-147
-------
TABLE 18 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF 1972 HOT START TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON ALL
FAILED VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
1975 & 1976 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 332 VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD ./
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
NO. OF CYL.
2
4
6
8
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 - 250
251 - 350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799
2800 - 3799
3800 - 4799
4800 - 5799
ALL VEHICLES
9
29
16
56
14
0
24
18
82
24
14
45
41
20
28
60
16
124
HC
MEAN S.D.
2
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
.15
.55
.65
.68
.13
.92
.86
.65
.92
.75
.50
.87
.97
.79
.63
.72
.73
0.5
0.9
0.8
1.0
0.6
0.9
0.7
0.9
0.9
0.7
0.9
0.9
1.0
0.8
0.9
1.0
0.9
CO
MEAN S.D.
45.86
44.14
34.09
46.00
31.91
32.69
40.05
45.80
32.69
33.65
42.23
51.35
32.06
37.95
45.67
51.08
42.43
36.3
23.8
28.0
26.7
15.5
13-9
31.2
27-2
13-9
20.3
29.3
27.4
15.7
29.5
24.6
32.4
26.1
C02
MEAN S.D.
430.6
583.1
664.0
537.3
358.6
354.3
430.5
613.0
354.3
417.4
551.5
667.2
351.2
452.7
594.6
696.5
536.4
54.4
109.2
126.6
104.1
74.7
50.4
44.7
83.3
50.4
39.9
47.5
78.9
61.3
73.9
71.2
89.5
131.7
NOXC
MEAN S.D.
1.88
1.21
1.45
1.02
1.47
1.21
1.45
1.19
1.21
1.33
1.15
1.30
1.17
1.33
1.19
1.30
1.23
0.6
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.7
0.7
0.7-
0.5
0.7
0.6
0.6
0.5
0.7
0.7
0.6
0.4
0.6
MPG
MEAN
17.1
13.5
12.3
11.ll
21.1
21.6
17.8
12.9
21.6
18.T
11.3
11.8
21.8
17.1
13-2
11.3
11.6
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
3-148
-------
TABLE 18 CONT'D
qilMMARY OF 1972 HOT START TEST PROCEDURE EXHAUST EMISSION REDUCTIONS
ON ALL FAILED VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
1975 & 1976 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 332 VEHICLES
FUEL
NO. OF HC CO C02 NOXC ECONOMY
VEH IMPR *IMPR IMPR $IMPR IMPR fcEMPR IMPR £EMPR IMPR 5&IMPR
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS 9 0.26 10.6 -2.17 -5.0 -26.4 -6.5 0.53 22.1-1.05 -5-7
CHRYSLER 29 1.76 53.2 36.21 45.1 -66.8 -12.9 0.35 22.5-0.09 -0.7
FORD 16 1.41 46.1 37.91 52.7 -71.9 -12.1 0.11 6.9-0.13 -1.1
GENERAL MOTORS 56 1.67 49-9 33-91 42.4 -48.6 -9.9 0.21 16.9 0.23 1.6
IMPORTS 14 0.48 18.3 16.88 34.6 -41.3 -13-0 -0.09 -6.5 -0.71 -3-2
NO. OF CYL.
2 0
1 24 0.58 23-3 15.79 32.6 -28.5 -8.8 0.04 3-1 -0.10 -0.5
6 18 0.73 28.3 14.58 26.7 -32.5 -8.2 0.41 22.2-0.26 -1.5
8 82 1.82 52.5 38.18 45.5 -65.3 -11.9 0.23 16.0 0.01 0.1
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151 24 0.58 23-3 15.79 32.6 -28.5 -8.8 0.04 3.1-0.10 -0.5
151 - 250 14 0.88 33-5 21.81 39.3 -31.9 -8.3 0.38 22.2 0.20 1.1
251 - 350 45 1.35 47.4 31.56 42.8 -52.3 -10.5 0.23 16.5 0.04 0.2
MORE THAN 350 41 2.17 53.8 40.68 44.2 -76.5 -13.0 0.26 16.5 -0.09 -0.8
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799 20 0.61 23-5 19-80 38.2 -31.6 -9-9 0.02 1.7 0.08 0.4
2800 - 3799 28 0.82 31-4 17.28 31.3 -34.6 -8.3 0.32 19.4 -0.16 -0.9
3800 - 4799 60 1.64 50.2 37-08 44.8 -64.9 -12.3 0.25 17-2 -0.03 -0.2
4800 - 5799 16 2.67 60.8 41.73 45.0 -70.6 -11.3 0.18 12.1 0.05 0.4
ALL VEHICLES 124 1.42 45.1 30.42 41.8 -53.4 -11.1 0.22 15.0-0.03 -0.2
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE
pUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON
FUEL EC°NOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
3-149
-------
TABLE 18 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF 1972 HOT START TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON ALL
FAILED VEHICLES BEFORE MAINTENANCE
DENVER
1974 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 100 VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD '
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
NO. OF CYL.
2
4
6
8
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 - 250
251 - 350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799
2800 - 3799
3800 - 4799
4800 - 5799
1
6
8
9
7
0
12
5
14
12
5
8
6
10
11
7
3
HC
MEAN S.D.
6.30
4.68
5.57
6.13
3-77
4.05
4.30
6.46
4.05
4.30
6.72
6.10
4.27
5.28
6.04
5.82
0.0
1.2
1.1
3.6
0.7
1.1
1.2
2.6
1.1
1.2
3.5
0.5
1.2
3.4
0.8
0.6
CO
MEAN S.D.
73
83
90
95
57
9 ~~
67
70
99
67
70
80
125
59
78
98
137
.25
.16
.67
.58
.73
.76
.33
.80
.76
.33
.48
.55
.39
.67
.51
.66
0.0
26.3
38.3
38.3
15.0
23.6
9.0
38.5
23.6
9.0
37.5
22.3
24.1
20.9
30.8
28.0
C02
MEAN S.D.
385.1
461.3
425.9
490.5
298.7
290.5
374.8
550.4
290.5
374.8
509.4
605.1
305.8
381.5
550.5
652.1
0.0
102.4
163.5
123.5
30.6
27.6
13-8
72.2
27.6
13-8
48.4
63.1
55.5
77.0
39.8
34.8
NOXC
MEAN S.D.
1.47
2.70
1.58
1.49
1.62
1.39
1.85
2.07
1.39
1.85
2.28
1.80
1.78
1.76
1.87
1.57
0.0
1.3
1.1
0.6
0.8
0.8
0.7
1.2
0.8
0.7
1.5
0.5
1.1
1.3
0.5
0.4
MPG
MEAH
17.1
11.6
15.1
13.1
22.1
21.7
17.8
12.2
21.7
17-8
13-5
10.8
21.5
17.0
12.2
10.C
ALL VEHICLES
31 5.18 2.2 82.64 33.3 421.5 132.5 1.77 1.0
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
3-150
-------
TABLE 18 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF 1972 HOT START TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON ALL
FAILED VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
1974 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 100 VEHICLES
NO. OF HC
VEH MEAN S.D.
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
NO. OF CYL.
2
4
6
8
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 - 250
251 - 350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799
2800 - 3799
3800 - 4799
4800 - 5799
1
6
8
9
7
0
12
5
14
12
5
8
6
10
11
7
3
4.75
3.66
4.47
5.20
4.08
3.97
3.57
5.16
3.97
3.57
5.43
4.81
4.15
4.39
4.89
4.60
0.0
0.9
1.1
3.1
1.9
1.6
0.7
2.5
1.6
0.7
3.2
1.0
1.7
2.9
1.3
0.2
CO
MEAN S.D.
59.33
56.78
63.44
65.88
49.06
56.32
57.52
62.89
56.32
57.52
58.13
69.25
53.47
66.61
49.01
77.81
0.0
12.6
22.4
40.8
17.0
19.8
13.6
34.3
19.8
13.6
44.8
13-1
22.0
35.2
12.5
12.3
C02
MEAN S.D.
390
503
466
545
327
322
408
602
322
408
573
641
333
425
608
690
.7
.4
.8
.9
.5
.6
.1
.8
.6
.1
.6
.9
.9
.4
.7
.4
0.0
109.3
157.3
141.1
64.7
51.3
16.0
71.9
51.3
16.0
62.1
69.6
72.7
86.4
48.7
14.2
NOXC
MEAN S.D.
1.73
1.96
1.47
1.57
1.47
1.28
1.67
1.86
1.28
1.67
1.78
1.97
1.45
1.42
2.06
1.73
0.0
0.5
0.9
0.6
0.5
0.5
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.7
0.8
0.4
0.7
0.6
0.6
0.5
MPG
MEAN
17.8
14.7
15.3
13.3
21.3
20.9
17.4
12.4
20.9
17.4
13.0
11.6
20.6
16.3
12.7
10.7
ALL VEHICLES 31 4.45 2.0 59.48 26.3 462.9 144.1 1.61 0.6 15.6
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE
FUEL ECONOMY IN'MILES PER GALLON
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
3-151
-------
TABLE 18 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF 1972 HOT START TEST PROCEDURE EXHAUST EMISSION REDUCTIONS
ON ALL FAILED VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
1974 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 100 VEHICLES
FUEL
NO. OF HC CO C02 NOXC ECONOffl
VEH IMPR *IMPR IMPR 5&IMPR IMPR fcEMPR IMPR *IMPR IMPR
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS 1 1.55 24.7 13-93 19.0 -5.6 -1.5-0.26 -17.3 0.73 4j
CHRYSLER 6 1.02 21.8 26.38 31-7 -42.1 -9.1 0.73 27.2 0.06 0.4
FORD ' 8 1.10 19.7 27.23 30.0 -41.0 -9.6 0.11 6.7 0.14 0.9
GENERAL MOTORS 9 0.93 15.2 29.70 31.1 -55-5 -11.3-0.09 -5.8-0.12 -0.9
IMPORTS 7 -0.31 -8.1 8.66 15.0 -28.7 -9.6 0.14 8.7 -0.85 -3.9
NO. OF CYL.
2 0
4 12 0.08 2.0 11.44 16.9 -32.1 -11.1 0.11 8.0 -0.71 -3-3
6 5 0.72 16.9 12.81 18.2 -33.3 -8.9 0.18 9-5 -0.38 -2.1
8 14 1.29 20.0 36.90 37.0 -52.4 -9.5 0.21 10.3 0.16 1.3
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151 12 0.08 2.0 11.44 16.9 -32.1 -11.1 0.11 8.0-0.71 -3-3
151 - 250 5 0.72 16.9 12.81 18.2 -33-3 -8.9 0.18 9.5 -0.38 -2.1
251 - 350 8 1.29 19.2 22.35 27.8 -64.2 -12.6 0,50 22.1 -0.49 -3-1
MORE THAN 350 6 1.29 21.2 56.30 44.8 -36.8 -6.1-0.17 -9.6 0.79 7-3
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799 10 0.12 2.9 5.92 10.0 -28.1 -9.2 0.33 18.5 -0.92 -4.3
2800 - 3799 11 0.88 16.8 12.06 15.3 -43.9 -11.5 0.33 19.0-0.69 -1*-1
3800 - 4799 7 1.15 19.1 49.50 50.2 -58.2 -10.6 -0.18 -9.9 0.41 3-3
4800 - 5799 3 1.22 20.9 59.84 43.5 -38.3 -5.9-0.16 -10.1 0.72 7-2
ALL VEHICLES 31 0.73 14.1 23.16 28.0 -41.5 -9.8 0.17 9.5-0.08 -0-5
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
3-152
-------
TABLE 18 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF 1972 HOT START TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON ALL
FAILED VEHICLES BEFORE MAINTENANCE
DENVER
1973 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 121 VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
NO. OF CYL.
2
1|
6
8
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 - 250
251 - 350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799
2800 - 3799
3800 - 4799
4800 - 5799
ALL VEHICLES
2
13
14
12
12
0
17
7
29
17
7
17
12
15
19
14
5
53
HC
MEAN S.D.
5.53
6.00
5.37
6.67
4.98
5.10
3.76
6.58
5.10
3.76
5.91
7.53
4.85
5.38
6.52
7.54
5.73
3.5
4.5
2.0
2.3
2.1
2.2
0.5
3.2
2.2
0.5
1.6
4.6
2.2
1.9
4.3
2.1
2.9
CO
MEAN S.D.
84
99
107
87
56
62
77
106
62
77
98
117
58
86
107
130
88
.62
.47
.42
.41
.12
.45
.23
.43
.45
.23
.79
.26
.61
.68
.87
.50
.47
69.1
36.2
40.1
26.9
20.4
20.3
32.4
37.1
20.3
32.4
31.2
43.1
18.2
26.6
41.0
39.5
37.5
C02
MEAN S.D.
459.9
451.1
449.2
494.1
294.2
294.1
355.6
518.8
294.1
355.6
473.3
583.2
293-6
400.2
526.1
631.9
425.2
116.1
98.9
103.1
143.2
46.3
39.9
29.6
82.2
39.9
29.6
57.4
68.6
41.5
68.9
63-2
52.2
124.1
NOXC
MEAN S.D.
3.57
1.90
1.64
1.76
1.21
1.27
2.82
1.70
1.27
2.82
1.56
1.89
1.26
1.92
2.00
1.40
1.71
3.5
1.0
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.4
1.8
0.7
0.4
1.8
0.6
0.7
0.4
1.3
0.7
0.3
0.9
MPG
MEAN
14.5
14.2
14.0
13-6
22.3
21.7
18.2
12.6
21.7
18.2
13.7
11.2
22.1
16.0
12.4
10.3
15.2
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE
pUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON
ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
3-153
-------
TABLE 18 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF 1972 HOT START TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON ALL
FAILED VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
1973 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 121 VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD '
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
NO. OF CYL.
2
4
6
8
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 - 250
251 - 350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799
2800 - 3799
3800 - 4799
4800 - 5799
ALL VEHICLES
2
13
14
12
12
0
17
7
29
17
7
17
12
15
19
14
5
53
HC
MEAN S.D.
3.15
4.80
4.63
4.94
4.51
4.31
3-33
5.18
4.31
3.33
4.56
6.07
4.27
4.09
5.36
6.02
4.66
0.5
4.4
1.7
2.3
2.5
2.1
0.3
3.3
2.1
0.3
1.8
4.6
2.3
1.6
4.2
3.0
2.8
CO
MEAN S.D.
31
65
63
59
49
50
54
64
50
54
57
73
49
54
67
77
58
.12
.12
.25
.74
.65
.86
.51
.17
.86
.51
.82
.16
.20
.78
.16
.60
.62
3-6
36.1
24.3
21.1
14.8
14.0
17-2
31.0
14.0
17.2
29.7
32.0
13.2
21.3
35.6
24.9
25.5
C02
MEAN S.D.
•
473.1
504.9
497.5
532.6
302.8
303.7
396.0
571.2
303.7
396.0
519.9
643.9
305.9
440.7
578.5
687.7
462.3
70.4
121.7
125.0
145.5
39.3
33-9
31.5
87.6
33.9
31.5
51.1
76.8
35.6
79.7
79.6
44.9
141.5
NOXC
MEAN S.D.
2.68
1.87
1.86
1.79
1.15
1.33
2.09
1.85
1.33
2.09
1.71
2.05
1.28
1.74
2.19
1.63
1.71
0.4
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.3
0.5
0.8
0.8
0.5
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.5
0.8
0.9
0.3
0.8
MPG
MEM
16.?
11.3
11.5
13.8
22.5
22.3
18.0
12.5
22.3
18.0
14.2
11,»
22.1
16.1
12.?
10.7
15*
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
3-154
-------
TABLE 18 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF 1972 HOT START TEST PROCEDURE EXHAUST EMISSION REDUCTIONS
ON ALL FAILED VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
1973 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 121 VEHICLES
FUEL
NO. OF HC CO C02 NOXC ECONOMY
VEH IMPR $IMPR IMPR 5&IMPR IMPR $IMPR IMPR %JMPR IMPR %JMPR
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS 2 2.38 43-0 53.49 63.2 -13-1 -2.9 0.90 25.0 2.15 14.8
CHRYSLER 13 1.20 20.0 34.36 34.5 -53.9 -11.9 0.03 1.5 0.09 0.6
FORD 14 0.74 13.7 44.16 41.1 -48.3 -10.7 -0.22 -13-2 0.54 3-8
GENERAL MOTORS 12 1.73 26.0 27.67 31.7 -38.5 -7.8-0.03 -1.6 0.22 1.6
IMPORTS 12 0.46 9-3 6.48 11.5 -8.5 -2.9 0.06 5.3 0.18 0.8
NO. OF CYL.
2 0
4 17 0.80 15.6 11.59 18.6 -9.6 -3-3 -0.06 -5.0 0.61 2.8
6 7 0.43 11.5 22.71 29.4 -40.4 -11.4 0.73 25.8 -0.12 -0.7
8 29 1.39 21.2 42.26 39.7 -52.4 -10.1 -0.15 -9.0 0.34 2.7
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151 17 0.80 15.6 11.59 18.6 -9.6 -3-3-0.06 -5.0 0.61 2.8
151 - 250 7 0.43 11.5 22.71 29.4 -40.4 -11.4 0.73 25.8 -0.12 -0.7
251 - 350 17 1.35 22.8 40.97 41.5 -46.6 -9.8-0.15 -9-4 0.48 3.5
MORE THAN 350 12 1.46 19.4 44.10 37.6 -60.7 -10.4-0.16 -8.6 0.19 1.7
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799 15 0.58 12.0 9.42 16.1 -12.3 -4.2-0.01 -1.1 0.24 1.1
2800 - 3799 19 1>2g 23.9 31.89 36.8 -40.4 -10.1 0.19 9.8 0.41 2.5
3800 - 4799 14 1.16 17.8 40.71 37-7 -52.4 -10.0-0.19 -9.5 0.27 2.2
4800 - 5799 5 1.52 20.1 52.91 40.5 -55.9 -8.8 -0.23 -16.8 0.40 3.9
ALL VEHICLES 53 1.07 18.7 29.84 33-7 -37.1 -8.7-0.01 -0.5 0.35 2.3
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE
ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON
ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
3-155
-------
TABLE 18 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF 1972 HOT START TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON ALL
FAILED VEHICLES BEFORE MAINTENANCE
DENVER
1972 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 111 VEHICLES
NO. OF HC
VEH MEAN S.D.
CO
MEAN S.D.
C02
MEAN S.D.
NOXC
MEAN S.D.
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD' '
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
NO. OF CYL.
2
4
6
8
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 - 250
251 - 350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799
2800 - 3799
3800 - 4799
4800 - 5799
ALL VEHICLES
0
14 4.39
8 9.51
28 6.45
14
7
17
4.39
6.62
7.92
12 6.32
17 6.13
19 6.68
13 6.27
1 5.45
0.9 52.42 15.5 286.3
8.5 103.26 30.5 313.8
2.2 93.63 34.0 483.8
0.9 52.42 15.5 286.3
2.6 103.87 32.9 316.4
6.0 92.96 25.8 439.0
2.4 95.03 43.2 531.4
6.2 63.71 26.8 287.9
2.4 88.29 33.7 413-9
2.3 102.16 37.3 .519.4
0.0 93.09 0.0 552.1
2 18.36 16.1 91.90 10.1 305.9 15.1 1.52 0.1 17.5
10 7.42 2.8 119.20 37.1 397.0 96.1 2.17 0.7 N,|
14 5.49 1.4 70.53 27.9 406.7 131.7 2.99 1.0-16.1
16 6.07 2.2 89.14 25.7 464.5 83-3 2.26 0.9 1U
8 4.18 0.8 49.03 19.2 294.4 48.7 2.10 1.0 2M
41
37
70
41
39
67
56
33
84
51
0
.0
.5
.7
.0
.7
.9
.7
.0
.6
.2
.0
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
.29
.00
.56
.29
.06
.20
.98
.18
.33
.80
.92
1
1
0
1
1
0
1
1
0
1
0
.0
.0
.9
.0
.0
.7
.0
.0
.8
.0
.0
23.2
17.5
13-1
23.2
11.1
Hi
12,1
21.1
15-1
12.'
12-1
50 6.36 4.0 83.64 35.1 401.3 111.0 2.39 0.9
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
3-156
-------
TABLE 18 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF 1972 HOT START TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON ALL
FAILED VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
1972 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 111 VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
NO. OF CYL.
2
4
6
8
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 - 250
251 - 350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799
2800 - 3799
3800 - 4799
4800 - 5799
ALL VEHICLES
2
10
14
16
8
0
14
8
28
14
7
17
12
17
19
13
1
50
HC
MEAN S.D.
4.26
5.40
3.97
4.22
4.28
4.15
3.89
4.66
4.15
4.07
4.93
4.12
4.00
5.00
4.02
4.60
4.40
2.3
3.7
1.0
2.1
1.2
1.3
1.0
2.7
1.3
0.9
3.4
0.9
1.3
3.2
1.0
0.0
2.2
CO
MEAN S.D.
61.17
63.85
45.59
54.28
40.25
40.61
55.19
56.41
40.61
57.84
52.14
60.81
45.21
52.68
58.85
55.10
51.79
34.7
37.1
12.3
14.9
19.9
15.7
18.7
25.0
15.7
18.5
15.4
34.3
19.7
14.6
33-5
0.0
22.6
C02
MEAN S.D.
342
465
442
524
295
291
353
549
291
350
503
599
301
476
578
591
445
.9
.8
.3
.0
.9
.6
.0
.3
.6
.6
.2
.7
.1
.6
.5
.7
.7
37.9
101.0
157.4
88.7
48.0
39.6
31.9
67.5
39.6
33.6
59.2
54.3
43.0
101.1
34.4
0.0
131.9
NOXC
MEAN S.D.
1.74
2.37
2.85
2.16
1.891
2.11
2.42
2.42
2.11
2.48
2.06
2.90
2.11
2.15
2.84
3.10
2.33
0.4
0.8
1.0
0.8
0.8
0.7
1.1
0.9
0.7
1.2
0.5
1.1
0.9
0.6
1.1
0.0
0.9
MPG
MEAN
19.6
15.2
16.9
14.3
23.8
24.1
19.6
13.6
24.1
19.5
14.8
12.5
23.1
15.4
13.0
12.8
16.4
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE
MEL ECONOMY IN 'MILES PER GALLON : *
°EL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
3-157
-------
TABLE 18 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF 1972 HOT START TEST PROCEDURE EXHAUST EMISSION REDUCTIONS
ON ALL FAILED VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
1972 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 111 VEHICLES
FUEL
NO. OF HC CO C02 NOXC ECONOMY
VEH IMPR JIMPR IMPR JIMPR IMPR JIMPR IMPR *IMPR IMPR %^
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS 2 14.10 76.8 30.73 33-4 -37.0 -12.1 -0.22 -14.3 2.16 ]2.i
CHRYSLER 10 2.03 27-3 55.36 46.4 -68.8 -17.3 -0.20 -9.1 0.62 4.2
FORD 14 1.52 27.6 24.94 35.4 -35.6 -8.7 0.14 4.8 0.27 1,6
GENERAL MOTORS 16 1.84 30.4 34.86 39.1 -59.4 -12.8 0.10 4.4 0.03 0.2
IMPORTS 8 -0.10 -2.4 8.78 17-9 -1.5 -0.5 0.21 10.1 0.74 3.2
NO. OF CYL.
2 0
4 14 0.24 5.5 11.81 22.5 -5.3 -1.8 0.18 7.7 0.88 3-8
6 8 5.62 59.1 48.07 46.6 -39.2 -12.5 -0.43 -21.3 2.10 12.0
8 28 1.79 27.7 37.22 39.8 -65.5 -13.5 0.14 5.3-0.03 -0.2
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151 14 0.24 5-5 11.81 22.5 -5.3 -1.8 0.18 7.7 0.88 3-8
151 - 250 7 2.55 38.5 46.03 44.3 -34.2 -10.8 -0.42 -20.4 1.80 10.2
251 - 350 17 2.98 37.7 40.82 43.9 -64.1 -14.6 0.14 6.6 0.23 ^
MORE THAN 350 12 2.20 34.9 34.22 36.0 -68.3 -12.8 0.07 2.5 -0.13 -I-1
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799 17 2.13 34.7 18.50 29.0 -13.2 -4.6 0.07 3-1 1-28 5-5
2800 - 3799 19 1.68 25.2 35.61 40.3 -62.7 -15.1 0.18 7-8 -0.04 -0.2
3800 - 4799 13 2.25 35.9 43-31 42.4 -59.1 -11.4-0.04 -1.5 0.30 2.«
4800 - 5799 1 0.85 15.6 37.99 40.8 -39.6 -7.2 -1.19 -61.8 0.41 3-3
ALL VEHICLES 50 1.97 30.9 31.84 38.1 -44.5 -11.1 0.06 2.4 0.35 2'2
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
3-158
-------
. 7.3 Federal Short Cycle Test Results
Emission and fuel economy results by the Federal Short Cycle Test
procedure for the Denver Inspection/Maintenance Evaluation Task vehicles
are presented on the thirty-six pages comprising Table 19 which follow.
3-159
-------
TABLE 19
SUMMARY OF FEDERAL SHORT TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON PHASE 1
PASSED VEHICLES BEFORE MAINTENANCE
DENVER
1975 & 1976 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 112 VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD •
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
NO. OF CYL.
2
4
6
8
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 - 250
251 - 350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799
2800 - 3799
3800 - 4799
4800 - 5799
ALL VEHICLES
2
5
20
27
19
2
17
11
43
19
11
19
24
17
19
27
10
73
HC
MEAN S.D
0.60
1.35
1.04
0.97
1.59
5.10
1.10
0.71
1.13
1.52
0.71
1.32
0.97
1.64
0.79
1.21
0.95
1.17
0.2
0.5
0.6
0.7
^2.1
6.9
0.5
0.5
0.6
2.1
0.5
0.6
0.6
2.2
0.5
0.6
0.6
1.2
CO
MEAN S.D.
'
2.02
15.33
23.10
20.48
21.94
45.58
18.23
9.17
23.50
21.10
9.17
25.23
22.13
21.22
10.47
26.67
23.27
20.72
2.0
7.0
15.2
21.3
20.2
58.7
12.9
7.4
18.9
20.4
7.4
22.0
16.3
20.0
10.8
20.1
17.4
18.5
C02
MEAN S.D.
476
450
521
472
344
567
301
403
517
329
403
454
567
332
409
498
603
451
.6
.3
.5
.5
.2
.5
.3
.7
.1
.3
.7
.0
.1
.5
.1
.8
.9
.1
14.6
97.4
98.7
76.8
108.8
16.9
48.4
48.5
75.2
95.6
48.5
34.8
59.1
102.8
57.6
63.0
47.1
113.0
NOXC
MEAN S.D.
3.80
1.74
1.10
1.33
1.28
0.41
1.40
1.73
1.28
1.30
1.73
1.20
1.34
1.32
1.55
1.29
1.17
1.35
2.5
0.5
0.4
0.9
0.8
0.0
0.8
0.7
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.9
1.0
0.8
0.7
1.1
0.5
0.9
MPG
MEAH
18.4
18.5
15.8
17.5
23.1
13-5
26.6
21.1
15.9
24.2
21.1
17-8
14.7
23-9
20.1
16.3
13-8
18.2
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
3-160
-------
TABLE 19 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF FEDERAL SHORT TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON PHASE 1
PASSED VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
1975 & 1976 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 112 VEHICLES
NO. OF HC
VEH MEAN S.D.
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
80. OF CYL.
2
1)
6
8
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 - 250
251 - 350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799
2800 ~ 3799
3800 - 4799
4800 - 5799
2
5
20
27
19
2
17
11
43
19
11
19
24
17
19
27
10
0.7**
1.09
0.79
0.74
1.79
6.78
1.16
0.57
0.86
1.75
0.57
0.96
0.79
1.84
0.67
0.88
0.89
0.2
0.1
0.3
0.5
2.7
8.3
0.6
0.4
0.4
2.7
0.4
0.3
0.4
2.8
0.4
0.4
0.4
CO
MEAN S.D.
1.67
17.08
16.00
13.63
20.95
35.19
18.93
8.06
16.14
20.64
8.06
16.26
16.04
18.44
10.46
18.18
17.17
1.6
9-9
9.1
12.4
19.3
37.1
17.6
7.2
11.2
19.4
7.2
13-1
9.8
13.7
17.5
11.7
9.2
C02
MEAN S.D.
456
476
555
486
336
434
309
406
543
322
406
465
604
319
417
529
628
.5
.3
.8
.9
.4
.1
.6
.1
.0
.7
.1
.0
.8
.8
.1
.9
.0
0.3
119.0
121.0
87.2
86.6
102.8
53.1
52.0
93.2
68.1
52.0
36.9
76.1
71.5
54.9
92.4
47.7
NOXC
MEAN S.D.
3.43
1.50
1.16
1.22
1.04
0.51
1.11
1.37
1.29
1.05
1.37
1.16
1.39
1.08
1.29
1.35
1.10
2.5
0.8
0.4
0.8
0.4
0.1
0.5
0.5
0.9
0.5
0.5
1.0
0.9
0.4
0.5
1.1
0.3
MPG
MEAN
19.2
17.5
15.2
17.4
23.7
17-4
25.9
21.1
15.5
24.6
21.1
18.0
14.0
25.0
20.4
15.8
13.5
ALL VEHICLES 73 1.05 1.4 16.09 13.8 465.1 126.9 1.24 0.8
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE
FUEL ECONOMY IN-MILES PER GALLON
ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
18.0
3-161
-------
TABLE 19 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF FEDERAL SHORT TEST PROCEDURE EXHAUST EMISSION REDUCTIONS
ON PHASE 1 PASSED VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
1975 & 1976 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 112 VEHICLES
FUEL
NO OF HC CO C02 NOXC ECONOff
VEH IMPR JIMPR IMPR JIMPR IMPR 5&IMPR IMPR J&IMPR IMPR fan
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS 2 -0.14 -23-4 0.35 17.4 20.1 4.2 0.36 9.6 0.81 ly
CHRYSLER 5 0.26 19-4 -1.75 -11.4 -26.0 -5.8 0.24 13.8 -1.02 -5.5
FORD " 20 0.25 24.3 7.10 30.7 -34.3 -6.6 -0.05 -4.9 -0.60 -3,8
GENERAL MOTORS 27 0.23 23-3 6.85 33-5 -14.4 -3.0 0.11 8.2-0.10 -0,6
IMPORTS 19 -0.19 -12.2 0.99 4.5 7.8 2.3 0.24 18.8 0.54 2.3
NO. OF CYL.
2 2-1.68-32.9 10.38 22.8 133-3 23-5-0.10 -24.3 3-83 28.2
4 17 -0.06 -5-3 -0.70 -3-8 -8.3 -2.8 0.29 20.9 -0.75 -2.8
6 11 0.14 19.2 1.10 12.0 -2.4 -0.6 0.36 20.7-0.01 -O.t
8 43 0.26 23-4 7-37 31.3 -25.9 -5.0 -0.01 -0.6 -0.38 -2*
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151 19 -0.23 -15-0 0.47 2.2 6.6 2.0 0.25 19.4 0.44 t.8
151 - 250 11 0.14 19.2 1.10 12.0 -2.4 -0.6 0.36 20.7-0.01 -0.1
251 - 350 19 0.36 27-3 8.97 35.5 -11.0 -2.4 0.05 3.8 0.15 0.9
MORE THAN 350 24 0.19 19.1 6.10 27.5 -37.7 -6.7-0.05 -3.7-0.64 -M
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799 17-0.21-12.5 2.78 13.1 12.7 3-8 0.25 18.7 1-10 M
2800 - 3799 19 0.12 15.5 0.01 0.1 -7.9 -1-9 0.26 16.9 -0.36 -M
3800 - 4799 27 0.33 27.5 8.49 31.8 -31.1 -6.2 -0.06 -4.5 -0.49 -3-11
4800 - 5799 10 0.06 6.4 6.10 26.2 -24.0 -4.0 0.07 6.1 -0.30 -2-2
ALL VEHICLES 73 0.12 9-9 4.63 22.3 -13-9 -3.1 0.11 8.5-0.23 -1-3
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
3-162
-------
TABLE 19 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF FEDERAL SHORT TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON PHASE 1
PASSED VEHICLES BEFORE MAINTENANCE
DENVER
1974 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 30 VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
NO. OF CYL.
2
4
6
8
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 - 250
251 - 350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799
2800 - 3799
3800 - 4799
4800 - 5799
1
2
5
11
3
1
3
1
17
4
1
12
5
4
3
12
3
HC
MEAN S.D.
3.77
6.52
3.34
3.47
4.24
5.56
3.33
1.92
3.94
3.89
1.92
4.14
3.46
3.89
3.09
4.06
3.62
0.0
1.5
0.8
0.8
1.2
0.0
0.6
0.0
1.2
1.2
0.0
1.3
0.8
1.2
1.0
1.4
0.4
CO
MEAN S.D.
29.75
76.80
45.87
56.23
45.11
61.26
33.09
33.94
57.18
40.13
33.94
65.24
37.85
40.13
48.93
56.79
59.27
0.0
68.0
22.7
22.1
14.0
0.0
6.8
0.0
27.6
15.1
0.0
28.0
14.9
15.1
29.7
27.6
34.4
C02
MEAN S.D.
405
362
427
487
272
394
229
377
469
270
377
442
535
270
396
462
542
.6
.9
.0
.2
.6
.5
.4
.0
.6
.7
.0
.4
.0
.7
.9
.0
.1
0.0
74.6
103.6
60.6
105.6
0.0
30.8
0.0
68.1
86.3
0.0
53.1
56.7
86.3
17.3
62.1
60.6
NOXC
MEAN S.D.
2.35
1.33
1.61
1.40
1.05
0.35
1.48
1.12
1.51
1.20
1.12
1.32
1.96
1.20
1.40
1.38
1.99
0.0
1.2
0.6
0.7
0.6
0.0
0.2
0.0
0.7
0.6
0.0
0.7
0.5
0.6
0.8
0.7
0.8
MPG
MEAN
19.1
17-6
17.4
15.1
24.9
17.5
30.4
20.3
15.5
25.6
20.3
15.9
14.7
25.6
18.4
15.7
13.7
ALL VEHICLES 22 3.84 1.2 53.03 26.0 429.2 104.1 1.43 0.7 16.9
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE
MEL ECONOMY IN'MILES PER GALLON
FUEL ECOMOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
3-163
-------
TABLE 19 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF FEDERAL SHORT TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON PHASE 1
PASSED VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
1974 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 30 VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
NO. OF CYL.
2
4
6
8
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 - 250
251 - 350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799
2800 - 3799
3800 - 4799
4800 - 5799
ALL VEHICLES
1
2
5
11
3
1
3
1
17
4
1
12
5
4
3
12
3
22
HC
MEAN S.D.
3.18
3.50
2.92
3.35
3.56
1.52
3.85
1.92
3.37
3.27
1.92
3.24
3.69
3.27
2.74
3.25
4.01
3.29
0.0
0.1
0.5
1.2
1.8
0.0.
1.3
0.0
1.0
1.6
0.0
0.9
1.2
1.6
0.7
1.0
0.8
1.1
CO
MEAN S.D.
20
42
37
41
25
21
26
26
40
25
26
41
40
25
29
40
49
37
.18
.53
.57
.04
.54
.89
.62
.94
.73
.44
.94
.03
.03
.44
.26
.17
.86
.32
0.0
19.9
20.3
18.3
7.9
0.0
7.4
0.0
18.4
6.5
0.0
15.2
26.8
6.5
10.4
19.3
17.8
17.5
C02
MEAN S.D.
448.1
440.0
451.1
501.9
309.5
478.2
230.9
357.3
500.2
292.7
357.3
475.6
559.4
292.7
403.2
502.2
542.0
456.0
0.0
27.2
135.8
60.5
146.2
0.0
11.1
0.0
53.8
124.0
0.0
40.9
28.2
124.0
45.4
47.7
45.3
107.4
NOXC
MEAN S.D.
2.81
1.37
1.66
1.45
1.10
0.38
1.56
0.96
1.59
1.27
0.96
1.48
1.84
1.27
1.67
1.33
2.32
1.50
0.0
0.4
0.5
0.7
0.6
0.0
0.2
0.0
0.7
0.6
0.0
0.8
0.5
0.6
1.0
0.6
0.1
0.7
MPG
HEW
18.1
17,1
11.1
15,<
21$
11.2
31.1
21.9
15.»
25-9
21.9
16.1
1lfl
25-9
19.'
15-'
110
16.9
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER,GALLON
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
3-16*
-------
TABLE 19 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF FEDERAL SHORT TEST PROCEDURE EXHAUST EMISSION REDUCTIONS
ON PHASE 1 PASSED VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
1974 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 30 VEHICLES
f\ff HP PO PO9 NOYP
VEH IMPR *IMPR IMPR JIMPR IMPR % IMPR IMPR JIMPR
FUEL
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
NO. OF CYL.
2
4
6
8
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 - 250
251 - 350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799
2800 - 3799
1
2
5
11
3
1
3
1
17
4
1
12
5
4
3
0.59
3.02.
0.42
0.12
0.67
4.04
.-0.52
0.00
0.56
0.62
0.00
0.90
-0.24
0.62
0.36
15.7
46.3
12.7
3.4
15.9
72.6
-15.6
0.1
14.3
15.9
0.1
21.7
-6.9
15.9
11.5
9.56
34.27
8.30
15.19
19.56
39.37
6.47
7.00
16.45
14.70
7.00
24.21
-2.18
14.70
19.66
32.2
44.6
18.1
27.0
43.4
64.3
19.6
20.6
28.8
36.6
20.6
37.1
-5.8
36.6
40.2
-42.6
-77.1
-24.1
-14.6
-36.9
-83.8
-1.5
19.7
-30.6
-22.0
19.7
-33.2
-24.4
-22.0
-6.3
-10.5
-21.2
-5.6
-3.0
-13.5
-21.2
-0.6
5.2
-6.5
-8.1
5.2
-7.5
-4.6
-8.1
-1.6
-0.46
-0.03
-0.05
-0.05
-0.05
-0.04
-0.08
0.16
-0.08
-0.07
0.16
-0.16
0.12
-0.07
-0.28
-19.6
-2.6
-3.2
-3.7
-4.7
-11.3
-5.7
13.9
-5.3
-6.1
13.9
-12.4
6.1
-6.1
-19.9
-1.00
-0.46
-0.33
0.25
-0.28
-0.31
0.75
1.54
-0.08
0.23
1.54
0.22
-0.66
0.23
1.03
-5.2
-2.6
-1.9
1.7
-1.1
-1.8
2.5
7.6
-0.5
0.9
7.6
1.4
-4.5
0.9
5.6
3800 - 4799 12 0<81 19 g 16>62 ^^ _40i2 -8>7 0>Q5 ^.7 _0>32
1800 - 5799 3-0.39-10.9 9.41 15.9 .0.2 0.0-0.33 -16.5 0.30
ALL VEHICLES 22 0.55 14.3 15.70. 29.6 -26.8 -6.2-0.07 -4.7-0.01
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE
ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON
ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
2.2
-0.1
3-165
-------
TABLE 19 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF FEDERAL SHORT TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON PHASE 1
PASSED VEHICLES BEFORE MAINTENANCE
DENVER
1973 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 27 VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
VEHICLE
MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD •
GENERAL
IMPORTS
MOTORS
0
1
2
11
2
HC
MEAN S.D.
2.39
3.48
3-70
2.33^
0.0
0.0
1.7
1.4
CO
MEAN S.D.
13-90
53.43
52.85
41.72
0.0
9.8
25.5
7.1
C02
MEAN S.D.
331.2
486.8
506.8
298.7
0.0
4.7
66.6
97.6
NOXC
MEAN S.D.
4.57
1.65
1.58
1.36
0.0
1.2
1.2
0.1
HPG
MEW
21.6
15.3
11.8
23-9
NO. OF CYL.
2
4
6
8
0
2
1
13
2.33
2.39
3.67
1.4
0.0
1.6
41.72
13.90
52.94
7.1
0.0
23.5
298.7
331.2
503.7
97.6
0.0
61.3
1.36
4.57
1.59
0.1
0.0
1.1
23.9
21.6
11.8
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151
251 -
250
350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA
1800 -
2800 -
3800 -
4800 -
WEIGHT
2799
3799
4799
5799
2
1
6
7
1
3
10
2
2.33
2.39
3.86
3.51
3 29
2.10
3.79
3-65
1.4
0.0
2.0
1.2
0.0
0.6
1.8
0.6
41.72
13.90
53-28
52.65
46.75
36.15
45.89
85.76
7.1
0.0
20.1
27-7
0.0
22.0
19.1
25.6
298.7
331.2
461.6
539.8
229-7
374.8
498.4
569.7
97.6
0.0
45.7
49.7
0.0
47.4
57.1
22.3
1.36
4.57
1.34
1.80
'
1.40
2.24
1.83
0.76
0.1
0.0
0.8
1.4
0.0
2.0
1.2
0.0
23-9
21.6
15-9
11.0
28.3
20.3
15.2
12.«
ALL VEHICLES
16 3.42 1.5 49.10 23.4 467-3 99.0 1.75 1.3 16>0
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
3-166
-------
TABLE 19 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF FEDERAL SHORT TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON PHASE 1
PASSED VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
1973 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 27 VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
NO. OF CYL.
2
1
6
8
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 - 250
251 - 350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799
2800 - 3799
3800 - 4799
4800 - 5799
0
1
2
11
2
0
2
1
13
2
1
6
7
1
3
10
2
HC
MEAN S.D.
1.99
2.91
3.25
2.13
2 13
1-99
3.20
2.13
1.99
2.95
3-41
3.28
1.68
3.30
3.23
0.0
0.7
1.4
1.6
1:6
0.0
1.3
1.6
0.0
0.9
1.6
0.0
0.6
1.4
0.7
CO
MEAN S.D.
16.78
35.86
35.51
26.28
26.28
16.78
35.57
26.28
16.78
28.39
41.72
35.23
27.05
27.84
68.48
0.0
1.8
21.4
12.7
12.7
0.0
19.5
12.7
0.0
12.3
23.2
0.0
17.3
13-5
4-7
C02
MEAN S.D.
350
548
523
292
292
350
527
292
350
488
560
225
395
522
575
.5
.1
.7
.9
.9
.5
.4
.9
.5
.7
.7
.8
.8
-9
.6
0.0
71.2
46.8
94.8
94.8
0.0
48.3
94.8
0.0
18.8
39.7
0.0
70.4
44.4
52.7
NOXC
MEAN S.D.
3.29
2.29
1.70
1.47
1.47
3.29
1.79
1.47
3.29
1.50
2.04
1.57
1.81
2.04
1.02
0.0
1.1
1-3
0.1
0.1
0.0
1.2
0.1
0.0
0.7
1.6
0.0
1.3
1-3.
0.3
MPG
MEAN
23.2
14.5
15.0
26.0
26.0
23.2
15.0
26.0
23.2
16.4
13-9
30.4
20.0
15.4
12.8
18.6 487.1
100.7 1.84 1.2 16.2
ALL VEHICLES 16 2.99 1.3 33.23
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE
FUEL ECONOMY IN NILES PER GALLON
EL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
3-167
-------
TABLE 19 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF FEDERAL SHORT TEST PROCEDURE EXHAUST EMISSION REDUCTIONS
ON PHASE 1 PASSED VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
1973 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 27 VEHICLES
FUEL
NO OF HC CO C02 NOXC ECONOMY
VEH IMPR JIMPR IMPR *IMPR IMPR JIMPR IMPR $IMPR IMPR ftn
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS 0
CHRYSLER 1 0.40 16.8 -2.87 -20.7 -19-3 -5.8 1.29 28.1 -1.45 -5.9
FORD * 2 0.58 16.6 17-57 32.9 -61.3 -12.6-0.64 -39.0-0.79 -5.2
GENERAL MOTORS 11 0.45 12.2 17-34 32.8 -16.9 -3-3-0.12 -7.6 0.30 2.0
IMPORTS 2 0.21 8.9 15.45 37-0 5-9 2.0-0.11 -8.1 2.16 9.0
NO. OF CYL.
2 0
4 2 0.21 8.9 15-45 37-0 5.9 2.0 -0.11 -8.1 2.16 9-0
6 1 0.40 16.8 -2.87 -20.7 -19-3 -5.8 1.29 28.1 -1.45 -5.9
8 13 0.47 12.8 17-37 32.8 -23-7 -4.7 -0.20 -12.6 0.13 0.9
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151 2 0.21 8.9 15.45 37-0 5.9 2.0 -0.11 -8.1 2.16 9-0
151 - 250 1 0.40 16.8 -2.87 -20.7 -19-3 -5.8 1.29 28.1 -1.45 -5-9
251 - 350 6 0-91 23.6 24.90 46.7 -27.0 -5-9 -0.16 -12.0 0.44 2.8
MORE THAN 350 7 0.09 2.7 10.92 20.7 -20.9 -3-9 -0.23 -12-9 -0.07 -0-5
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799 1 0.02 0-5 11.52 24.6 3-9 1.7-0.16 -11.7 2.14 7-6
2800 - 3799 3 0.42 20.1 9.10 25.2 -21.0 -5.6 0.42 19-0 -0.25 -1-2
3800 - 4799 10 0.48 12.7 18.05 39.3 -24.5 -4.9 -0.21 -11.6 0.1* °'9
4800 - 5799 2 0.42 11.6 17.28 20.2 -5.9 -1.0 -0.26 -34.4 0.40 3-3
ALL VEHICLES 16 0.43 12.7 15.87 32.3 -19-7 -4.2 -0.10 -5.5 0.19 1l2
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
3-168
-------
TABLE 19 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF FEDERAL SHORT TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON PHASE 1
PASSED VEHICLES BEFORE MAINTENANCE
DENVER
1972 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 25 VEHICLES
NO. OF HC
VEH MEAN S.D.
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
NO. OF CYL.
2
4
6
8
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 - 250
251 - 350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799
2800 - 3799
3800 - 4799
4800 - 5799
0
1
5
6
2
0
3
1
10
3
1
4
6
4
4
5
1
2.94
3.08
3.85
2.72
2.68
2.89
3.59
2.68
2.89
3.69
3.53
2.73
3.05
4.02
3.64
0.0
0.5
1.3
0.2
0.2
0.0
1.0
0.2
0.0
1.4
0.9
0.2
0.5
1.3
0.0
CO
MEAN S.D.
21
37
71
30
35
43
54
35
43
49
58
37
37
53
131
.05
.28
.55
.98
.31
.31
.95
.31
.31
.48
.60
.31
.28
.88
.00
0.0
9.5
36.1
5.2
8.4
0.0
34.9
8.4
0.0
30.4
40.0
7.9
13.5
29.1
0.0
C02
MEAN S.D.
422.3
464.2
464.7
244.9
274.2
286.8
491.2
274.2
286.8
453.4
516.4
277.4
452.0
511.6
545.5
0.0
102.8
76.4
20.4
52.8
0.0
43.7
52.8
0.0
34.9
28.4
43.6
33.2
26.0
0.0
NOXC
MEAN S.D.
3-54
2.78
1.76
1.85
1.62
2.15
2.47
1.62
2.15
2.00
2.79
1.76
2.32
2.93
0.76
0.0
0.7
1.2
0.8
0.7
0.0
1.2
0.7
0.0
1.0
1.3
0.6
1.0
1.2
0.0
MPG
MEAN
19.1
16.7
15.1
29.4
26.2
24.4
15.1
26.2
24.4
16.3
14.3
25-8
17.1
14.6
11.6
ALL VEHICLES 14 3.35 1.0 49.91 30.4 430.1 108.7 2.27 1.1 17.1
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE
PUEL ECONOMY IN UILES PER GALLON
PUEL ECON°MY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
3-169
-------
TABLE 19 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF FEDERAL SHORT TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON PHASE 1
PASSED VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
1972 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 25 VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
HC
MEAN S.D.
CO
MEAN S.D.
C02
MEAN S.D.
NOXC
MEAN S.D.
MPG
MEAH
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
0
1
5
6
2
3.33
2.62
4.41
2.83
0.0
0.6
1.2
0.9
46.62
26.78
73-81
31.12
0.0
14.7
60.6
6.6
407.0
507.7
488.2
239.6
0.0
113.8
98.9
8.3
2.84
2.87
1.68
1.75
0.0
1.1
1.2
0.8
18.1
15.9
1U
29.8
NO. OF CYL.
2
4
6
8
0
3
1
10
4.05
2.46
3-39
2.2
0.0
0.9
43.11
22.08
53.42
21.3
0.0
51.8
262.5
319.5
524.7
40.1
0.0
62.4
1.46
4.29
2.21
0.8
0.0
1.1
25.9
24.5
11.3
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN
151 -
251 -
MORE THAN
151
250
350
350
3
1
4
6
4.05
2.46
3-72
3.17
2.2
0.0
0.9
1.0
43.11
22.08
44.46
59.40
21.3
0.0
23.1
66.3
262.5
319.5
484.6
551.5
40.1
0.0
74.4
39.2
1.46
4.29
1.90
2.41
0.8
0.0
0.7
1.3
25.9
21.5
15.7
13-6
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 -
2800 -
3800 -
4800 -
2799
3799
4799
5799
4
4
5
1
3-65
3-17
3.37
4.41
2.0
0.3
1.3
0.0
37.85
29.61
45.07
190.46
20.3
14.5
22.9
0.0
276.7
463.5
568.7
549.7
43.4
47-3
27.8
0.0
2.17
2.10
2.64
0.51
1.6
0.7
1.1
0.0
25.5
17-1
13-7
10.3
ALL VEHICLES
14 3.47 1.2 48.97 44.8 453.9 129.0 2.20 1.2
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
3-170
-------
TABLE 19 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF FEDERAL SHORT TEST PROCEDURE EXHAUST EMISSION REDUCTIONS
ON PHASE 1 PASSED VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
1972 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 25 VEHICLES
FUEL
NO. OF HC CO C02 NOXC ECONOMY
VEH IMPR $IMPR IMPR *IMPR IMPR flMPR IMPR JIMPR IMPR frCMPR
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS 0
CHRYSLER 1-0.39-13.2-25.57-121.5 15-3 3.6 0.70 19-9-1.02 -5.3
FORD 5 0.46 15.1 10.50 28.2 -43-5 -9.4 -0.09 -3.1 -0.76 -4.6
GENERAL MOTORS 6-0.56-14.5 -2.26 -3.2 -23-5 -5.1 0.08 4.8-0.70 -4.7
IMPORTS 2 -0.12 -4.3 -0.13 -0.4 5.3 2.2 0.09 5.0 0.47 1.6
NO. OF CYL.
2 0
4 3 -1.37 -51.0 -7.80 -22.1 11.7 4.3 0.16 10.1 -0.37 -1.4
6 1 0.43 14.8 21.23 49.0 -32.7 -11.4 -2.14 -99.5 0.14 0.6
8 10 0.20 5.6 1.53 2.8 -33-5 -6.8 0.26 10.6 -0.74 -4.9
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151 3-1.37-51.0 -7.80 -22.1 11.7 4.3 0.16 10.1-0-37 -1.4
151 - 250 1 0,43 14.8 21.23 49.0 -32.7 -11.4 -2.14 -99-5 0.14 0.6
251 - 350 4 -0.03 -0.9 5.01 10.1 -31.1 -6.9 0.10 4.8 -0.67 -4.1
MORE THAN 350 6 0.36 10.2 -0.80 -1.4 -35.1 -6.8 0.37 13-3-0.77 -5.4
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799 4 -0.92 -33.6 -0.54 -1.5 0.6 0.2 -0.41 -23.5 -0.23 -0.9
2800 - 3799 4-0.12 -3.9 7.67 20.6 -11.5 -2.5 0.22 9.6 0.01 0.0
3800 - 11799 5 0.65 16.3 8.81 16.3 -57.0 -11.1 0.29 10.0 -0.92 -6.3
4800 - 5799 1-0.77-21.2-59.45 -45.4 -4.2 -0.8 0.26 33-5-1.35-11.6
ALL VEHICLES 14-0.12 -3.5 0.94 1.9 -23.8 -5.5 0.07 3.0-0.72 -4.2
RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE
PUEL ^NOMY IN MILES PER GALLON
& ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
3-171
-------
TABLE 19 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF FEDERAL SHORT TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON ALL PHASE 1
VEHICLES BEFORE MAINTENANCE
DENVER
1975 & 1976 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 112 VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD -
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
NO OF CYL.
2
4
6
8
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 - 250
251 - 350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799
2800 - 3799
3800 - 4799
4800 - 5799
6
15
25
40
26
2
27
17
66
29
15
29
39
27
26
43
16
HC
MEAN S.D
1 26
2.37
1.51
1 48
1 64
5-10
1 41
1.02
1 77
_
1.67
0-95
1-57
1 91
1 70
1 11
1 78
1.94
0.5
1 0
1.8
1.1
1 8
6.9
0.6
07
1.4
17
0.7
0.7
1-8
1 8
0 7
1 5
1-5
CO
MEAN S D
12.21
40-32
33-50
34.01
22.78
45-58
23.89
12.54
38.16
25-38
11 79
29-83
43-34
24 54
16.12
38 41
45-93
9-8
28.2
48.4
33-9
18.5
58.7
15-5
10.5
40.1
19-5
10-7
23 6
47-7
19-5
18.3
40.6
42.1.
C02
MEAN S.D.
399
458
527
447
334
567
293
389
505
312
389
446
543
319
396
491
561
.5
.0
.7
.1
.2
.5
.4
.9
.3
.3
.1
.1
.7
0
.4
.5
.2
70.5
76.0
91.9
88.7
101 9
16.9
46.1
55-6
71.6
83-5
58.2
40.1
63-9
91-9
66.2
64.4
72.0
NOXC
MEAN S.D.
3-18
2.05
1.14
1.16
1.24
0 41
1.30
1.95
1.33
1 24
1.82
1.34
1.41
1.25
1.70
1.39
1.20
1.5
0.7
0.4
0.8
0-7
0.0
0.7
0.9
0.9
0.7
0.9
1.1
0.9
0.7
0 9
1.1
0.6
MPG
MEM
21.0
16.8
15.2
17.6
23-1
13-5
26.5
21.5
15.5
2U
21.6
17-8
1M
24.5
20.9
15-9
13-9
ALL VEHICLES
112 1.63 15 30.97 33-8 437-8 .111.3 1.40 0.9
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
3-172
-------
TABLE 19 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF FEDERAL SHORT TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON ALL PHASE 1
bum VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
1975 & 1976 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 112 VEHICLES
NO. OF HC
VEH MEAN S.D.
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
NO. OF CYL.
2
4
6
8
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 - 250
251 - 350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799
2800 - 3799
3800 - 4799
4800 - 5799
ALL VEHICLES
6
15
25
40
26
2
27
17
66
29
15
29
39
27
26
43
16
112
1.16
1.20
0.90
0.97
1-77
6 78
1-30
0-76
1 07
1 68
0.69
1.05
1 10
1 72
0.81
1.09
1.14
1.18
0.4
0.7
0.5
0.6
2.3
8.3
0.6
0.5
0 6
2.2
0.4
0.4
0.8
2.3
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.3
CO
MEAN S.D.
10
21
18
20
21
35
20
9
21
21
9
17
23
19
11
21
26
19
.14
.44
.11
.11
-55
19
-35
28
54
-37
.04
89
73,
.63
• 73
.81
,66
.64
7.8
15.1
13.3
18.4
18.4
37 1
15.9
7 0
17 1
17 2
7.3
14.9
18.1
13 7
16.1
15 1
21.1.
16.5
C02
MEAN S.D.
411.9
500.7
563-4
465.9
329.8
434.1
304 2
401 6
535-9
313.2
401.3
457-9
587.1
315.6
409.7
525.7
593-7
457.8
40.2
91.4
114.3
93-5
84.3
102 8
51-6
45 2
87-4
63-0
47.4
37-0
75-4
69-1
56.1
88.1
70.7
123.9
NOXC
MEAN S.D.
2.46
1.67
1.15
1.08
1.10
0.51
1.10
1 45
1.29
1.06
1.33
1.29
1.34
1.08
1.31
1.41
1.03
1.25
1.4
0.9
0.4
0.7
0.5
0.1
0.5
0.6
0.9
0.5
0.5
1.0
0.8
0 5
0.6
1.0
0.4
0.8
MPG
MEAN
20.6
16.5
14.9
17-7
24.0
17.4
26.1
21.2
15-5
25.2
21.2
18.1
14.1
25.2
20.6
15.8
13 9
18.0
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON
EL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1 1 85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
3-173
-------
TABLE 19 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF FEDERAL SHORT TEST PROCEDURE EXHAUST EMISSION REDUCTIONS
ON ALL PHASE 1 VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
1975 & 1976 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 112 VEHICLES
NO. OF HC CO C02 NOXC EO ^
VEH IMPR JIMPR IMPR JIMPR IMPR %JMPE IMPR JIMPR IMPR
VEHiaE MFG.
AMER MOTORS 6 0.10 7 2.07 16.9 -12.4 -3-1 0.72 22.7 -0.43 -2.0
CHRYSLER 15 1.17 49 18.88 46.8 -42.7 -9-3 0.38 18.8-0.29 -1.?
FORD - 25 0.61 40 15.40 46.0 -35-7 -6.8-0.01 -1.0-0.24 -1.6
GENERAL MOTORS 40 0.51 34 13-90 40.9 -18.8 -4.2 0.08 6.8 0.16 0.9
IMPORTS 26-0.13 -7 1.23 5.4 4.4 1.3 0.14 11.5 0.38 1.6
NO. OF CYL.
2 2 -1.68 -32 10.38 22.8 133-3 23.5 -0.10 -24.3 3-83 28.2
4 27 0.11 7 3-54 14.8 -10.8 -3.7 0.20 15.6 -0.38 -U
6 17 0.26 25 3.26 26.0 -11.7 -3.0 0.50 25-6 -0.29 -1.1
8 66 0.70 39 16.62 43.6 -30.6 -6.1 0.04 3.3 -0.06 -0.»
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151 29 -0.01 -0 4.01 15.8 -0.8 -0.3 0.18 14.7 0.38 1.5
151 - 250 15 0.26 27 2.75 23.3 -12.2 -3.1 0.49 27.0 -0.36 -1.7
251 - 350 29 0.53 33 11 94 40.0 -11.8 -2.7 0.05 3-9 0.31 I-8
MORE THAN 350 39 0.81 42 19.61 45.2 -43.5 -8.0 0.06 4.6 -0.23 -^
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799 27 -0.01 -0 4.91 20.0 3.4 1.1 0.17 13-5 0.77 3-1
2800 - 3799 26 0.30 27 4.39 27-2 -13-2 -3-3 0.39 23-2 -0.26 -I-2
3800 - 4799 43 0.69 38 16.59 43.2 -34.2 -7.0 -0.02 -1.4 -0.17 -1-1
4800 - 5799 16 0.81 41 19-27 42.0 -32.5 -5.8 0.17 14.1 0.01 0.0
ALL VEHICLES 112 0.45. 27 11.33 36.6 -20.0 -4.6 0.15 10.6 -0.03 -°-z
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A V1.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
3-174
-------
TABLE 19 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF FEDERAL SHORT TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON ALL PHASE 1
^ VEHICLES BEFORE MAINTENANCE
DENVER
1974 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 30 VEHICLES
NO. OF HC
VEH MEAN S.D.
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
NO. OF CYL.
2
H
6
8
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 - 250
251 - 350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799
2800 - 3799
3800 - 4799
1800 - 5799
1
4
7
13
5
1
6
4
19
7
4
12
7
7
6
12
5
3.77
4.87
3-51
3.42
3-65
5.56
2.93
2.84
4.00
3-31
2.84
4.14
3.78
3-31
3-12
4.06
4.00
0.0
2.1
0.9
0.9
1.3
0.0
0.8
0.7
1.2
1.2
0.7
1-3
0.9
1.2
0.7
1.4
0.6
CO
MEAN S.D.
29-75
64.31
54.64
60.33
41.08
61.26
35.28
47.00
63.06
38.99
47.00
65.24
59-33
38.99
50.14
56.79
80.77
0.0
42.1
28.2
28.0
12.0
0.0
6.6
10.1
31.6
11.5
10.1
28.0
39.1
11.5
19.2
27.6
38.9
C02
MEAN S.D.
405.6
341.2
427.4
478.4
278.8
394.5
253.9
333.6
480.2
274.0
333.6
442.4
544.9
274.0
358.0
462.0
553-1
0
50
105
91
75
0
35
29
72
62
29
53
52
62
44
62
50
.0
.2
.9
.5
.6
.0
.7
.7
.2
.3
.7
.1
.3
.3
.3
.1
.3
NOXC
MEAN S.D.
2.35
1.64
1.52
1.42
1.05
0.35
1.43
1.50
1.49
1.28
1.50
1.32
1.79
1.28
1.51
1.38
1.73
0.0
0.9
0.6
0.7
0.5
0.0
0.4
0.7
0.7
0.6
0.7
0.7
0.5
0.6
0.8
0.7
0.7
MPG
MEAN
19.1
19.4
16.9
15.2
25.0
17.5
27.9
21.3
15.0
25.7
21.3
15.9
13.7
25.7
19.9
15.7
12.8
ALL VEHICLES 30 3.69 1.2 55.31 27.8 412.5 112.3 1.44 0.7 17.4
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE
mi EC°NOMY IN MILES PER GALLON ^ *
& ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1*1.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
3-175
-------
TABLE 19 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF FEDERAL SHORT TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON ALL PHASE 1
VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
1974 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 30 VEHICLES
NC
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD •
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
NO. OF CYL.
2
4
6
8
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 - 250
251 - 350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799
2800 - 3799
3800 - 4799
4800 - 5799
I. OF
VEH
1
4
7
13
5
1
6
4
19
7
4
12
7
7
6
12
5
HC
MEAN
3.18
2.88
3.02
3.29
3-14
1.52
3.12
2.25
3.42
2.89
2.25
3.24
3.74
2.89
2.55
3.25
3-95
i
's.D.
0.0
0.7
0.6
1.2
1.4
0.0
12
0.3
0.9
1.3
0.3
0.9
1.0
1.3
0.5
1.0
0.6
0
MEAN
20.18
39.50
41.93
43.38
27.57
21.89
31-06
40.39
42.30
29.75
40.39
41.03
44.48
29.75
37.07
40.17
52.16
0
S.D.
0.0
13.6
18.8
18.2
10.0
0.0
11.1
16.2
18.4
10.7
16.2
15.2
24.1
10.7
15.0
19.3
15.3
ME.
448
398
455
491
303
478
254
355
510
286
355
475
570
286
379
502
564
C<
UN
.1
.1
.5
.1
.3
.2
.6
.5
.7
.5
.5
.6
.8
.5
.0
.2
.9
D2
S.D.
0.0
50.8
129.3
97.3
104.3
0.0
33.3
2.5
59.9
89.8
2.5
40.9
31.9
89.8
39.1
47.7
46.7
NC
MEAN
2.81
1.55
1.50
1.44
1.08
0.38
1.42
1.25
1.56
1.27
1.25
1.48
1.70
1.27
1.51
1-33
1.93
)XC
S.D.
0.0
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.5
0.0
0.4
0.7
0.7
0.5
0.7
0.8
0.5
0.5
0.8
0.6
0.6
MFC
MEM
18.]
18,5
16.?
15.6
21.5
17.2
28.3
20.8
15.1
25-5
20.8
16.1
13-6
25-5
19-5
15-'
13-5
ALL VEHICLES
30 3.-14 1.0 39.12 17.0 437-7. 117.6 1.45 0.6
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A '1-1.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
3-176
-------
TABLE 19 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF FEDERAL SHORT TEST PROCEDURE EXHAUST EMISSION REDUCTIONS
ON ALL PHASE 1 VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
1974 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 30 VEHICLES
FUEL
NO. OF HC CO C02 NOXC ECONOMY
VEH IMPR $IMPR IMPR 5&IMPR IMPR $IMPR IMPR $IMPR IMPR $IMPR
VEHiaE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS 1 0.59 15-7 9.56 32.2 -42.6 -10.5 -0.46 -19-6 -1.00 -5.2
CHRYSLER 4 1.99 40.8 24.81 38.6 -56.9 -16.7 0.10 5.8 -0.48 -2.5
FORD 7 0.50 14.1 12.71 23-3 -28.1 -6.6 0.03 1.9 -0.21 -1.2
GENERAL MOTORS 13 0.14 4.0 16.95 28.1 -12.8 -2.7-0.02 -1.6 0.38 2.5
IMPORTS 5 0.51 13-9 13-51 32.9 -24.5 -8.8 -0.03 -3.1 -0.12 -0.5
NO. OF CYL.
2 1 4.04 72.6 39-37 64.3 -83-8 -21.2 -0.04 -11.3 -0.31 -1.8
1 6 -0.18 -6.3 4.23 12.0 -0.6 -0.3 0.01 0.8 0.48 1.7
6 4 0.60 21.0 6.61 14.1 -21.9 -6.6 0.25 16.8 -0.48 -2.3
8 19 0.58 14.5 20.76 32.9 -30.5 -6.4 -0.07 -4.8 0.10 0.7
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151 7 0.42 12.7 9.25 23-7 -12.5 -4.6 0.00 0.3 0.25 1.0
151 - 250 4 0.60 21.0 6.61 14.1 -21.9 -6.6 0.25 16.8 -0.48 -2.3
251 - 350 12 0.90 21.7 24.21 37.1 -33-2 -7-5 -0.16 -12.4 0.22 1.4
MORE THAN 350 7 0.03 0.9 14.85 25.0 -25-9 -4.8 0.08 4.7 -0.05 -0.4
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799 7 0.42 12.7 9-25 23-7 -12.5 -4.6 0.00 0.3 0.25 1.0
2800 - 3799 5 0>5? 18 4 13 0? 26 ., _21 Q -5 g Q OQ Q2 Q>06 Q 3
3800 - 4799 12 0.81 19-9 16.62 29-3 -40.2 -8.7 0.05 3-7 -0.32 -2.0
4800 - 5799 5 0.05 1.2 28.62 35.4 -11.8 -2.1 -0.20 -11.5 0.65 5.1
ALL VEHICLES 30 0.54 14.8 16.19 29.3 -25.2 -6.1-0.01 -0.8 0.07 0.4
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE
NEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON
& ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
3-177
-------
TABLE 19 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF FEDERAL SHORT TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON ALL PHASE 1
VEHICLES BEFORE MAINTENANCE
DENVER
1973 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 27 VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
HC
MEAN S.D.
CO
MEAN S.D.
C02
MEAN S.D.
NOXC
MEAN S.D.
MPG
MEAN
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD •
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
1
3
6
12
5
2.66
3.26
4.23
3.72
3.17
0.0
0.8
1.9
1.6
1.4
21.47
53-01
74.03
53-28
43.97
0.0
35.3
34.5
24.4
18.7
324.0
335-4
405.2
488.5
279.2
0.0
63.4
96.1
89.6
57.4
5.55
3.26
1.69
1.55
1.06
0.0
1.M
0.9
1.1
0.3
212
20.1
16.6
15.2
218
NO. OF CYL.
2
4
6
8
0
7
3
17
3-22
2.87
3.96
1.2
0.6
1.7
45.71
32.70
62.69
16.2
26.3
29.9
275.1
309.8
480.3
49.2
31-0
71.4
1.23
4.52
1.60
0.5
1.0
1.0
219
210
15-0
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN
151 -
251 -
MORE THAN
151
250
350
350
7
3
8
9
3.22
2.87
3-93
3.98
1.2
0.6
1.7
1.8
45.71
32.70
60.49
64.65
16.2
26.3
21.6
37.0
275.1
309.8
441.6
514.7
49.2
31.0
54.5
69.1
1.23
4.52
1.29
1.87
0.5
1.0
0.7
1.2
219
210
16.2
111
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 -
2800 -
3800 -
4800 -
2799
3799
4799
5799
6
6
13
2
3.52
2.83
4.07
3.65
0-9
1.1
1.9
0.6
47.22
45-74
58.05
85.76
17.2
26.2
31-5
25.6
259-7
347-4
479.8
569.7
30.0
50.7
63-3
22.3
1.22
2.71
1.87
0.76
0.5
2.1
1.0
0.0
25-7
20.1
15-2
12.'
ALL VEHICLES
27 3,64 15 54.96 28.0 408.1 114.3 1.83 1-3
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
3-178
-------
TABLE 19 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF FEDERAL SHORT TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON ALL PHASE 1
a ' VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
1973 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 27 VEHICLES
NO. OF HC
VEH MEAN S.D.
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
NO. OF CYL.
2
4
6
8
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 - 250
251 - 350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799
2800 - 3799
3800 - 4799
1800 - 5799
1
3
6
12
5
0
7
3
17
7
3
8
9
6
6
13
2
2.38
2.37
3-10
3.33
3.14
3.24
2.27
3-19
3.24
2.27
2.90
3.45
3.62
2.12
3.30
3.23
0.0
0.4
0.9
1.3
2.3
1-9
0.2
1.2
1.9
0.2
0.8
1.5
1.8
0.6
1.3
0.7
CO
MEAN S.D.
20.16
26.96
38.07
37.46
35.75
35.61
24.23
36.22
35-61
24.23
29.48
42.21
38.66
29.04
30.35
68.48
0.0
9.6
10.1
21.4
15.6
16.3
10.1
17.9
16.3
10.1
10.8
21.3
15.6
12.7
14.4
4.7
C02
MEAN S.D.
366
363
460
502
282
274
340
512
274
340
477
544
260
384
510
575
.2
.9
.1
.1
.5
.5
.1
.6
-5
.1
.2
.1
.3
.1
.6
.6
0.0
68.0
117.4
86.9
51.4
44.5
32.6
51.4
44.5
32.6
26.7
47.9
26.0
65.1
46.6
52.7
NOXC
MEAN S.D.
2.18
3.03
2.34
1.63
1.17
1.27
2.94
1.94
1.27
2.94
1-53
2.31
1.25
1.96
2.26
1.02
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.2
0.3
0.5
0.7
1.2
0.5
0.7
0.7
1.5
0.5
1.2
1.2
0.3
MPG
MEAN
21.9
21.5
16.8
15.5
25.9
26.0
23.0
15.3
26.0
23.0
16.7
14.3
26.7
20.3
15.6
12.8
VEHICLES 27 3.10 1.3 34.73 16.8 431.7 118.6 1.88 1.1 17.9
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON
UEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A V1.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
3-179
-------
TABLE 19 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF FEDERAL SHORT TEST PROCEDURE EXHAUST EMKSSION REDUCTIONS
ON ALL PHASE 1 VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
1973 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 27 VEHICLES
FUEL
NO. OF HC CO C02 NOXC ECONOMY
VEH IMPR $IMPR IMPR 5&IMPR IMPR JIMPR IMPR 5&IMPR IMPR %Qft
VEHICLE MFG.~~ '
AMER. MOTORS 1 0.29 10.8 1.31 6.1 -42.2 -13-0 3-36 60.6 -2.34 .9.1
CHRYSLER 3 0.89 27-4 26.05 49-1 -28.5 -8.5 0.24 7.2 0.76 3.?
FORD • 6 1.14 26.8 35-95 48.6 -54.9 -13-6-0.64 -38.1 0.16 1.0
GENERAL MOTORS 12 0.39 10.5 15.82 29-7 -13-6 -2.8 -0.08 -5-4 0-33 2.2
IMPORTS 5 0.03 1-0 12.23 27-8 -3-3 -1.2 -0.11 -10.8 1.16 i?
NO. OF CYL.
2 0
4 7 -0.03 -0.8 10.10 22.1 0.6 0.2 -0.04 -3.2 1.19 1.8
6 3 0.60 20.8 8.47 25-9 -30-3 -9-8 1.59 35.0 -0.94 -3-9
8 17 0.77 19-3 26.47 42.2 -32.3 -6.7-0.34 -21.6 0.30 2.0
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151 7-0.03 -0.8 10.10 22.1 0.6 0.2-0.04 -3-2 1.19 *•'
151 - 250 3 0.60 20.8 8.47 25.9 -30.3 -9-8 1.59 35.0 -0.94 -3-9
251 - 350 8 1.03 26.2 31.01 51.3 -35.6 -8.1 -0.24 -18.5 0.50 3-1
MORE THAN 350 9 0.53 13-3 22.44 34.7 -29.4 -5.7 -0.44 -23-5 0.17 1-2
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799 6 -0.10 -2.8 8.56 18.1 -0.7 -0.3 -0.04 -3-0 0.97 3-8
2800 •- 3799 6 0.71 25.1 16.70 36.5 -36.7 -10.6 0.75 27-7 -0-39 -1-5
3800 - 4799 13 0.78 19-0 27-70 47-7 -30.8 -6.4 -0.39 -21.1 0.41 2.7
4800 - 5799 2 0.42 11.6 17-28 20.2 -5-9 -1.0 -0.26 -34.4 0.40 3-3
ALL VEHICLES 27 0.54 14.9 20.23 36.8 -23-6 -5..8 -0.05 -2.8 0.35 2-°
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A VI.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
3-180
-------
TABLE 19 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF FEDERAL SHORT TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON ALL PHASE 1
bura^ VEHICLES BEFORE MAINTENANCE
DENVER
1972 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 25 VEHICLES
NO. OF HC
VEH MEAN S.D.
CO
MEAN S.D.
C02
MEAN S.D.
NOXC
MEAN S.D.
MPG
MEAN
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
1
3
6
11
4
24.57
5.95
3.16
4.32
2.99
0.0
3.4
0.5
1.1
0.5
64.33
95.47
38.53
70.12
31-31
0.0
65.9
9.1
32.9
7.7
260.0
346.4
427.6
443.4
265.8
0.0
113.6
128.4
71.4
45.5
1.55
2.11
2.91
1.92
1.67
0.0
1.3
0.7
1.1
0.5
20.2
17.2
17.8
15.6
27.4
NO. OF CYL.
2
4
6
8
0
6
3
16
3-02
12.37
4.10
0.5
11.1
1.1
35.66
84.74
63.15
9.0
54.6
35.7
273.4
254.2
462.6
46.5
35.8
60.6
1.90
1.53
2.32
0.9
0.6
1.1
26.2
20.8
15.4
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN
151 -
251 -
MORE THAN
151
250
350
350
6
2
8
9
3.02
6.27
6.76
4.02
0.5
4.8
7.3
1.1
35.66
94.94
64.01
62.51
9.0
73.0
32.1
38.6
273.4
251.3
400.6
495.3
46.5
50.2
74.6
45.8
1.90
1.52
1.82
2.68
0.9
0.9
0.8
1.1
26.2
21.1
17.0
14.6
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 -
2800 -
3800 -
4800 -
2799
3799
4799
5799
7
9
8
1
5.98
4.47
4.39
3.64
8.2
2.2
1.2
0.0
40.18
65.10
60.04
131.00
13.7
42.4
32.8
0.0.
265.1
387.4
489.7
545.5
34.8
83-3
44.5
0.0
1.99
1.82
2.76
0.76
0.8
0.9
1.0
0.0
25.6
17.6
14.8
11.6
VEHICLES 25 4.84 4.4 59.14 36.0 392.2 109.8 2.13 10 17.7
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE
NEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON
EL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A VI.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
3-181
-------
TABLE 19 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF FEDERAL SHORT TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON ALL PHASE 1
VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
1972 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 25 VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD .
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
NO. OF CYL.
2
4
6
8
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 - 250
251 - 350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799
2800 - 3799
3800 - 4799
4800 - 5799
1
3
. 6
11
4
0
6
• 3
16
6
2
8
9
7
9
8
1
HC
MEAN S D.
1.93
3.02
2.43
3.80
3.22
3.48
2.35
3-27
3.48
2.56
3-12
3.26
2.96
3.11
3.40
4.41
0.0
0.3
0.7
1-3
1.0
1.8
0.4
0.9
1.8
0.1
1.0
0.9
1.7
0.7
1.1
0.0
CO
MEAN S.D.
20.
35.
26.
57.
27.
33.
22.
47.
33.
22.
39.
51.
31.
31-
41.
190.
51
72
30
01
79
70
13
20
70
94
17
37
27
45
42
46
0.0
11.4
13-2
47.9
5-5
17-0
1.6
41.6
17.0
1.2
19.8
54.0
16.6
14.0
18.6
0.0
C02
MEAN S.D.
352.3
397-2
468.0
486.4
261.5
270.6
331.6
508.1
270.6
321.2
457-0
536.3
282.2
429.2
545.1
549.7
0.0
70.0
140.8
74.9
39.4
35.8
18.0
57.7
35.8
2.4
66.9
43-1
44.9
68.4
43.8
0.0
NOXC
MEAN S.D.
2.09
2.67
2.66
1.91
1.60
1.48
2.94
2.24
1.48
3.36
1.90
2.51
1.98
1.98
2.66
0.51
0.0
0.2
1.1
1.1
0.5
0.5
1.2
1.0
0.5
1.3
0.8
1.0
1.1
0.8
0.9
0.0
MPG
HEM
22.?
19.2
17.2
15.1
28.!
26.5
23-f
15.0
26.5
2i3
16.8
lit
26-0
18.2
1i3
10.3
ALL VEHICLES
25 3-21 1.1 40.95 35.0 429.9 118.4 2.14 1.0
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1'1;85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
3-182
-------
TABLE 19 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF FEDERAL SHORT TEST PROCEDURE EXHAUST EMISSION REDUCTIONS
ON ALL PHASE 1 VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
1972 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 25 VEHICLES
FUEL
NO. OF HC CO C02 NOXC ECONOMY
VEH IMPR ZIMPR IMPR 56IMPR IMPR JIMPR IMPR 5&IMPR IMPR $IMPR
VEHiaE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS 1 22.64 92.2 43.82 68.1 -92.2 -35.5 -0.54 -34.8 2.51 12.4
CHRYSLER 3 2.94 49.4 59-75 62.6 -50.8 -14.7-0.56 -26.7 1.95 11.3
FORD 6 0.72 23.0 12.23 31.7 -40.4 -9.4 0.25 8.7 -0.65 -3-6
GENERAL MOTORS 11 0.52 12.0 13-11 18.7 -43-0 -9-7 0.01 0.5-0.55 -3-5
IMPORTS 4 -0.23 -7.7 3-52 11.2 4.3 1.6 0.07 4.2 0.79 2.9
NO. OF CYL.
2 0
4 6-0.46-15.2 1.97 5.5 2.8 1.0 0.42 22.3 0.35 1.3
6 3 10.02 81.0 62.61 73-9 -77-3 -30.4 -1.41 -92.1 2.94 14.1
8 16 0.83 20.3 15-95 25-3 -45-5 -9-8 0.09 3-7 -0.46 -3-0
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151 6-0.46-15.2 1.97 5.5 2.8 1.0 0.42 22.3 0.35 1.3
151 - 250 2 3-71 59.1 72.00 75.8 -69.9 -27.8 -1.84 -121.2 3-18 15.1
251 - 350 8 3.64 53.8 24.85 38.8 -56.4 -14.1 -0.09 -4.8 -0.19 -1.1
MORE THAN 350 9 0.76 18.9 11.13 17.8 -41.0 -8.3 0.17 6.3-0.49 -3.4
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799 7 3.02 50.6 8.92 22.2 -17-1 -6.4 0.01 0.4 0.49 1.9
2800 - 3799 9 1>36 3Q^ 33 65 51 ? ,41 8 _10.8 -0.15 -8.5 0.56 3.2
3800 - 4799 8 1.00 22.7 18.62 31.0 -55.4 -11.3 0.10 3-5 -0.55 -3-7
4800 - 5799 1-0.77-21.2-59.45 -45.4 -4.2 -0.8 0.26 33-5-1.35-11.6
ALL VEHICLES 25 1.62 33-6 18.19 30.8 -37.7 -9.6-0.01 -0.6-0.14 -0.8
ASSIGN RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE
NEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON
ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1 "1.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
3-183
-------
TABLE 19 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF FEDERAL SHORT TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON ALL
FAILED VEHICLES BEFORE MAINTENANCE
DENVER
1975 & 1976 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 332 VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
HC
MEAN S.D.
CO
MEAN S.D.
C02
MEAN S.D.
NOXC
MEAN S.D.
HPG
MEJU
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD .
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
9
29
16
56
14
1.88
3.08
2.64
2.93
1.91
0.4
1.7
2.2
1.6
0.6
28.80
56.52
57.25
62.81
32.61
18.4
26.2
60.9
30.3
18.3
349.6
441.7
521.2
422.0
285.9
43.6
73.5
97.9
85.3
67.8
2.31
1.77
1.17
0.92
1.04
0.9
0.7
0..7
0.4
0.5
22.1
16.1
11.3
16.?
25.5
NO. OF CYL.
2
4
6
8
0
24
.18
82
2.04
1.91
3.12
0.6
0.6
1.8
36.78
31.93
65.01
17.1
17.6
37.1
283.7
348.7
473.7
44.0
43.4
69.7
0.98
1.85
1.22
0.5
0.9
0.7
25.5
21.9
15-2
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN
151 -
251 -
MORE THAN
151
250
350
350
24
14
45
41
2.04
1.93
2.65
3.52
0.6
0.6
1.0
2.3
36.78
30.70
58.63
69.19
17.1
15.4
28.5
44.3
283.7
337.8
428.9
514.5
44.0
41.3
44.4
67.2
0.98
1.76
1.14
1.40
0.5
0.9
0.8
0.7
25.5
22.6
16.8
11,0
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 -
2800 -
3800 -
4800 -
2799
3799
4799
5799
20
28
60
16
2.02
2.17
2.99
3.69
0.7
0.7
1.7
2.2
36.62
40.15
63.90
68.59
19.5
22.1
38.7
36.5
285.4
357.3
460.8
535.8
60.2
56.9
62.4
69.0
0.95
1.59
1.19
1.39
0.5
0.9
0.7
0.7
25-'
20.8
15.«
13-5
ALL VEHICLES 124 2.74 1.6 54.74 34.8 418.8 100.6 1.27 0.7 17>3
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
3-184
-------
TABLE 19 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF FEDERAL SHORT TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON ALL
FAILED VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
1975 & 1976 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 332 VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
NO. OF CYL.
2
4
6
8
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 - 250
251 - 350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799
2800 - 3799
3800 - 4799
4800 . 5799
ALL VEHICLES
9
29
16
56
14
0
24
18
82
24
14
45
41
20
28
60
16
124
HC
MEAN S.D.
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
.57
.23
.53
.46
.68
.53
.29
.46
.53
.18
• 32
.63
.53
.36
.45
.46
.45
0.4
0.7
0.8
0.8
0.5
0.8
0.6
0.8
0.8
0.5
0.7
0.8
0.9
0.7
0.7
0.8
0.8
CO
MEAN S.D.
26.31
27.13
26.03
33.61
25.17
23-31
22.19
33.12
23.31
17.15
30.34
36.83
22.95
23.65
33.88
32.56
29.64
24.5
19.3
24.8
24.6
14.8
13.9
20.4
24.3
13-9
12.5
23.1
26.0
15.5
22.5
23.6
23.1
22.5
C02
MEAN S.D.
373.8
493.9
569.0
460.2
310.1
308.9
369.7
522.4
308.9
356.8
470.0
569.4
307.1
385.1
508.8
590.8
458.9
53-6
90.6
120.8
86.3
64.8
46.6
42.4
74.2
46.6
34.5
41.4
72.2
55.5
59.3
65.3
79.3
111.9
NOXC
MEAN S.D.
1.77
1.25
1.05
0.74
1.12
0.94
1.38
0.96
0.94
1.27
0.91
1.09
0.94
1.18
0.96
1.04
1.02
0.6
0.7
0.4
0.4
0.6
0.5
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.5
0.6
0.6
0.5
0.6
MPG
MEAN
21.1
16.4
14.4
17.1
25.0
25.3
21.7
15.3
25.3
22.9
17.0
14.0
25.5
20.8
15.7
13.7
17.4
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE
PUEL EC°NOMY IN MILES PER GALLON
EL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
3-185
-------
TABLE 19 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF FEDERAL SHORT TEST PROCEDURE EXHAUST EMISSION REDUCTIONS
ON ALL FAILED VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
1975 & 1976 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 332 VEHICLES
NO. OF HC CO C02 .NOXC ECOlSff
VEH IMPR *IMPR IMPR 5&IMPR IMPR *IMPR IMPR JIMPR IMPR
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS 9 0.31 16.4 2.49 8.6 -24.2 -6.9 0.54 23.5 -1,02 -U
CHRYSLER 29 1.86 60.2 29.39 52.0 -52.2 -11.8 0.53 29.6-0.01 -0.0
FORD - 16 1.10 41.9 31.22 54.5 -47.8 -9-2 0.11 9.7 0.11 0.8
GENERAL MOTORS 56 1.48 50.4 29.20 46.5 -38.2 -9.1 0.18 19.9 0.40 2.1
IMPORTS 14 0.23 12.0 7.44 22.8 -24.2 -8.4 -0.08 -8.1 -0.86 -3.3
NO. OF CYL.
2 0
4 24 0.51 25.0 13.47 36.6 -25.2 -8.9 0.04 4.2 -0.18 -0.1
6 18 0.62 32.5 9.73 30.5 -21.0 -6.0 0.47 25.5 -0.20 -0.5
8 fffi 82 1.67 53.4 31.88 49.0 -48.7 -10.3 0.26 21.5 0.18 1.2
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151 24 0.51 25.0 13-47 36.6 -25.2 -8.9 0.04 4.2 -0.18 -0.1
151 - 250 14 0.76 39.2 13-55 44.1 -19.1 -5.6 0.48 27.4 0.27 1-2
251 - 350 45 1.33 50.2 28.29 48.3 -41.2 -9-6 0.23 19-9 0.24 1.»
MORE THAN 350 41 1.89 53.7 32.36 46.8 -54.9 -10.7 0.32 22.7 0.04 0.3
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799 20 0.48 23-9 13-67 37-3 -21.7 -7-6 0.00 0.5 0.10 0.»
2800 - 3799 28 0.80 37-0 16.50 41.1 -27.8 -7.8 0.41 25.6 0.03 °J
3800 - 4799 60 1.54 51.6 30.02 47.0 -48.0 -10.4 0.23 19-5 0.11 O-7
4800 - 5799 16 2.22 60.3 36.03 52.5 -54.9 -10.3 0.35 25-3 0.18 1iJ
ALL VEHICLES 124 1.29 47.2 25.11 45.9 -40.1 -9.6 0,25 19-7 0.12 ^
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
3-186
-------
TABLE 19 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF FEDERAL SHORT TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON ALL
FAILED VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
1974 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 100 VEHICLES
NO. OF HC
VEH MEAN S.D.
CO
MEAN S.D.
C02
MEAN S.D.
NOXC
MEAN S.D.
MPG
MEAN
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
1
6
8
9
7
3.15
3-35
3-35
4.70
2.03
0.0
2.0
0.8
2.7
0.6
43.88
40.37
43.15
51.01
30.85
0.0
12.3
15.7
36.9
10.9
337.8
425.7
403-7
451.9
291.6
0.0
94.3
130.4
124.0
59.1
1.20
2.12
1.28
1.33
1.22
0.0
0.6
0.8
0.9
0.4
21.3
17.8
18.4
16.2
25.6
NO. OF CYL.
2
4
6
8
0
12
5
14
2.41
2.56
4.63
0.8
0.4
2.3
36.62
41.62
47.06
12.8
13.5
31.0
282.7
346.7
507.4
47.6
11.6
65.6
1.10
1.58
1.69
0.4
0.8
0.8
25.5
21.1
14.9
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN
151 -
251 -
MORE THAN
151
250
350
350
12
5
8
6
2.41
2.56
4.89
4.29
0.8
0.4
2.8
1.7
36.62
41.62
46.81
47.39
12.8
13.5
40.8
13.3
282.7
346.7
473.7
552.3
47.6
11.6
51.8
56.6
1.10
1.58
1.42
2.04
0.4
0.8
0.9
0.6
25.5
21.1
15.8
13.9
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 -
2800 -
3800 -
4800 -
2799
3799
4799
5799
10
11
7
3
2.38
3.42
4.88
3.64
0.8
2.5
1.8
0.4
34.57
50.61
36.42
49.67
14.6
32.6
12.6
15.5
294.9
354.7
514.3
593.0
67.3
60.9
34.1
21.3
1.20
1.20
2.12
1.54
0.5
0.7
0.8
0.4
24.9
19.9
15.1
13.0
VEHICLES 31 3.44 2.0 42.14 22.9 394.5 118.5 1.44 0.7
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE
P"EL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON
L ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
18.8
3-187
-------
TABLE 19 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF FEDERAL SHORT TEST PROCEDURE EXHAUST EMISSION REDUCTIONS
ON ALL FAILED VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
1974 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 100 VEHICLES
NO. OF HC CO C02 NOXC EOKW
VEH IMPR &EMPR IMPR *IMPR IMPR *IMPR IMPR fcEMPR IMPR
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS 1 1.01 24.3 16.68 27-5 10.1 2.9 -0.12 -11.5 1.85 9.5
CHRYSLER 6 0.85 20.3 24.96 38.2 -35.8 -9.2 0.38 15.0 0.22 :U
FORD . 8 1.20 26.4 20.69 32.4 -31.0 -8.3 0.09 6.3 0.20 1.1
GENERAL MOTORS 9 1.14 19.6 30.17 37.2 -33-0 -7-9-0.14 -11.5 0.52 3.3
IMPORTS 7 0.94 31.6 13.15 29.9 -28.6 -10.9 0.09 6.6 -0.37 -1.1
NO. OF CYL.
2 0
4 12 0.95 28.2 13.11 26.4 -27-5 -10.8 0.09 7.8 -0.29 -1.1
6 5 0.89 25.9 11.38 21.5 -22.9 -7.1 0.13 7.5 -0.11 -0.5
8 14 1.20 20.5 34.39 42.2 -36.0 -7.6 0.03 1*8 0.53 3-1
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151 12 0.95 28.2 13.11 26.4 -27.5 -10.8 0.09 7-8 -0.29 -1-'
151 - 250 5 0.89 25-9 11.38 21.5 -22.9 -7.1 0.13 7.5 -0.11 -0.5
251 - 350 8 1.64 25.1 26.72 36.3 -42.2 -9.8 0.22 13-6 0.14 O.S
MORE THAN 350 6 0.60 12.3 44.61 48.5 -27.8 -5.3 -0.22 -12.3 0.90 W
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799 10 1.23 34.1 9.86 22.2 -27.2 -10.2 0.25 17.4 -0.56 -2-2
2800 - 3799 11 1.28 27.2 12.56 19.9 -24.6 -7.4 0.22 15.6 -0.03 -°-2
3800 - 4799 7 0.64 11.6 46.29 56.0 -48.6 -10.4 -0.40 -23-4 0.61 W
4800 - 5799 3 0.60 14.2 44.94 47.5 -22.3 -3.9 0.01 0.8 0.89 1*
ALL VEHICLES
31 1.05 23.4 22.44 34.7 -30.6 -8.4 0.07 4.7 0.31 1
-------
TABLE 19 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF FEDERAL SHORT TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON ALL
FAILED VEHICLES BEFORE MAINTENANCE
DENVER
1974 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 100 VEHICLES
NO. OF HC
VEH MEAN S.D.
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
NO. OF CYL.
2
4
6
8
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 - 250
251 - 350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799
2800 - 3799
3800 - 11799
1800 - 5799
ALL VEHICLES
1
6
8
9
7
0
12
5
14
12
5
8
6
10
11
7
3
31
4.16
4.20
4.55
5.84
2.96
3.36
3.46
5.82
3.36
3.46
6.53
4.89
3.61
4.70
5.52
4.24
4.49
0.0
1.3
1.1
4.2
0.8
1.2
0.5
3.2
1.2
0.5
4.1
0.9
1.5
3.9
0.7
0.6
2.5
CO
MEAN S.D.
60
65
63
81
44
49
53
81
49
53
73
92
44
63
82
94
64
.56
.33
.84
.19
.00
.73
.00
.44
.73
.00
.53
.00
.43
.17
.71
.61
.58
0.0
20.5
26.8
39.8
15.1
18.4
6.1
34.5
18.4
6.1
41 .4
21.6
19.5
26.3
28.9
33.5
29.8
C02
MEAN S.D.
347.9
389.9
372.7
418.9
263.0
255.2
323.8
471.3
255.2
323.8
431.5
524.5
267.7
330.1
465.7
570.7
363.9
0.0
85.0
138.1
109.2
30.5
25.5
14.8
64.8
25.5
14.8
36.1
56.2
49.1
62.8
29.1
30.7
111.7
NOXC
MEAN S.D.
1.07
2.50
1.37
1.20
1.31
1.19
1.71
1.72
1.19
1.71
1.65
1.82
1.45
1.43
1.72
1.55
1.51
0.0
0.7
0.7
0.6
0.7
0.7
0.8
0.9
0.7
0.8
1.1
0.6
0.8
1.0
0.7
0.5
0.8
MPG
MEAN
19.5
17.5
18.2
15.7
26.0
25.8
21.2
14.4
25.8
21.2
15.6
13-0
25.4
20.0
14.5
12.1
18.5
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE
FUEL EC°NOMY IN MILES PER GALLON
EL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
3-189
-------
TABLE 19 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF FEDERAL SHORT TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON ALL
FAILED VEHICLES BEFORE MAINTENANCE
DENVER
1973 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 121 VEHICLES
NC
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
NO. OF CYL.
2
4
6
8
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 - 250
251 - 350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799
2800 - 3799
3800 - 4799
4800 - 5799
ALL VEHICLES
). OF
VEH
2
13
14
12
12
0
17
7
29
17
7
17
12
15
19
14
5
53
HC
MEAN
5.89
5.05
4.56
5.89
3-97
3.92
3.07
5.91
3.92
3-07
5.63
6.31
3.71
4.85
5.83
6.03
4.90
%
'S.D.
4.6
3.8
2.0
2.3
1.7
1.5
0.3
3.0
1.5
0.3
2.3
3.8
1.3
2.4
3.6
2.1
2.6
M
54
72
79
69
43
47
48
81
47
48
75
90
44
59
86
101
66
C
EAN
.76
.95
.72
.17
.35
.31
.92
.98
.31
.92
.65
.95
.93
.26
.83
.72
.49
0
S.D.
47.1
32.4
33-1
27.4
19.3
18.0
25.5
30.9
18.0
25.5
29.1
32.3
17.4
23.5
30.4
35.2
31.4
C
MEAN
394.3
386.4
389.8
420.9
260.3
260.9
314.7
441.5
260.9
314.7
407.9
489.1
260.6
353.3
442.7
524.5
3fifi.R
02
S.D.
99.4
76.6
76.8
116.5
37.3
33-6
24.1
63.8
33.6
24.1
46.9
54.2
34.1
62.1
50.5
51.3
Qft 7
N(
MEAN
3.21
1.83
1.34
1.54
0.99
1.09
2.82
1.42
1.09
2.82
1.37
1.49
1.07
1.86
1.66
0.96
1 .e;n
)XC
S.D.
3.3
1.2
0.7
0.7
0.3
0.1
1.9
0.7
0.4
1.9
0.7
0.7
0.4
1.4
0.7
0.3
1.0
MFC
MEAN
17.8
17.2
16.8
16.2
26.0
25.5
22.1
15.1
25-5
22.1
16.3
13-6
25.9
19-2
1H.9
12.6
18.2
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
3-190
-------
TABLE 19 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF FEDERAL SHORT TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON ALL
FAILED VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
1973 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 121 VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
NO. OF CYL.
2
4
6
8
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 - 250
251 - 350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799
2800 - 3799
3800 - 4799
^800 - 5799
ALL VEHICLES
2
13
14
12
12
0
17
7
29
17
7
17
12
15
19
14
5
53
HC
MEAN S.D.
2.93
4.20
3-72
4.97
3.51
3.38
2.64
4.77
3.38
2.64
4.22
5.56
3.33
3.43
4.94
6.03
4.04
0.8
3.7
1.6
3.4
1.9
1.6
0.4
3.3
1.6
0.4
2.0
4.5
1.7
1.5
3.7
4.4
2.7
CO
MEAN S.D.
17.52
51.20
43-50
50.83
36.32
38.15
36.60
50.02
38.15
36.60
44.58
57.73
37.25
36.87
56.91
59.86
44.44
3.7
34.8
18.1
30.8
12.9
13.0
17.2
31.6
13-0
17.2
30.5
32.8
11.9
18.1
34.7
37.7
25.7
C02
MEAN S.D.
411.2
422.0
433.8
451.1
267.8
266.9
341.5
485.6
266.9
341.5
443.1
545.8
269.4
382.5
479.5
597.5
396.4
63
90
112
123
34
30
29
73
30
29
40
69
32
72
57
59
116
.7
.5
.4
.3
.8
.9
.3
.9
.9
.3
.4
.2
.1
.2
.8
.1
.9
NOXC
MEAN S.D.
2.46
1.69
1.59
1.37
0.91
1.09
1.95
1.53
1.09
1.95
1.40
1.71
1.02
1.56
1.84
1.17
1.45
0.4
1.0
0.9
0.6
0.2
0.5
0.9
0.9
0.5
0.9
0.8
1.0
0.4
0.8
1.1
0.2
0.8
MPG
MEAN
19.8
17.2
17.3
16.2
26.4
26.3
21.8
15.3
26.3
21.8
16.9
13-6
26.2
19.7
15.2
12.5
18.5
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE
PUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON
L ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
3-191
-------
TABLE 19 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF FEDERAL SHORT TEST PROCEDURE EXHAUST EMISSION REDUCTIONS
SUMMAH* i* ^ VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
1973 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 121 VEHICLES
FIIFI
NO. OF HC CO C02 NOXC ECONOMY
VEH IMPR 3&IMPR IMPR /&IMPR IMPR $IMPR IMPR 5&IMPR IMPR
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS 2 2.96 50.2 37-24 68.0 -17.0 -4.3 0.75 23-3 2.02 1U
CHRYSLER 13 0.85 16.8 21.75 29-8 -35.6 -9-2 0.14 7-6 0.01 0.2
FORD 14 0.84 18.4 36.22 45.4 -44.0 -1.1.3 -0.25 -18.3 0.51 3.0
GENERAL MOTORS 12 0.92 15-7 18.34 26.5 -30.3 -7.2 0.17 11.2 0.04 0.]
IMPORTS 12 0.46 11.5 7.03 16.2 -7-5 -2.9 0.08 7.7 0.39 1.5
NO. OF CYL.
2 0
4 17 0.54 13.7 9.16 19.4 -6.0 -2.3 -0.00 -0.4 0.77 3.0
6 7 0.43 14.1 12.32 25.2 -26.8 -8.5 0.87 30.8 -0.33 -1.5
8 29 1.14 19.3 31.96 39-0 -44.1 -10.0 -0.11 -7-7 0.25 1.1
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151 17 0.54 13.7 9.16 19.4 -6.0 -2.3 -0.00 -0.4 0.77 3.0
151 - 250 7 0.43 14.1 12.32 25.2 -26.8 -8.5 0.87 30.8 -0.33 -1-5
251 - 350 17 1.41 25.1 31.07 41.1 -35.1 -8.6-0.03 -2.0 0.56 3-*
MORE THAN 350 12 0.76 12.0 33-22 36.5 -56.7 -11.6-0.22 -15.0-0.01-0-3
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799 15 0.38 10.3 7.68 17.1 -8.8 -3.4 0.06 5.2 0.35 1-3
2800 - 3799 19 1.42 29.3 22.39 37.8 -29.2 -8.3 0.29 15.7 0.15 2.3
3800 - 4799 14 0.90 15.4 29.92 34.5 -36.8 -8.3 -0.18 -10.6 0.33 ^
4800 - 5799 5 0.00 0.0 41.86 41.2 -73.0 -13.9-0.21 -22.1 -0.13 -I-0
ALL VEHICLES 53 0.85 17.4 22.05 33.2 -29.6 -8.1 0.05 3.6 0.30 ^
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
3-192
-------
TABLE 19 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF FEDERAL SHORT TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON ALL
FAILED VEHICLES BEFORE MAINTENANCE
DENVER
1972 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 111 VEHICLES
NO. OF HC
VEH MEAN S.D.
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
NO. OF CYL.
2
4
6
8
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 - 250
251 - 350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799
2800 - 3799
3800 - 4799
4800 - 5799
ALL VEHICLES
2
10
14
16
8
0
14
8
28
14
7
17
12
17
19
13
1
50
14.99
6.24
4.97
5.34
3.11
3.37
7.85
5.80
3.37
5.47
7.02
5.63
4.96
5.90
5.47
4.71
5.45
13.5
2.6
1.9
2.5
0.7
0.9
7.1
2.4
0.9
2.3
5.2
2.2
5.2
2.6
2.1
0.0
3.6
CO
MEAN S.D.
58.59
92.07
47.80
65.27
32.34
34.30
75.67
68.73
34.30
77.29
68.51
68.68
42.91
65.31
73-90
79.01
60.20
8.1
33.8
25.6
23.0
13-1
11.6
31.8
30.3
11.6
34.0
24.6
37.0
21.1
32.2
32.6
0.0
30.9
C02
MEAN S.D.
274
344
358
408
263
254
275
424
254
277
387
463
256
366
451
481
353
.2
.0
.8
.6
.9
.7
.4
.7
.7
.6
.3
.9
.3
.1
.2
.3
.2
20.0
83.0
119.1
74.6
41.1
37.7
34.2
65.3
37.7
36.4
61.8
59.4
32.1
81.8
48.6
0.0
97.8
NOXC
MEAN S.D.
1.42
1.80
2.57
1.82
1.76
2.08
1.62
2.07
2.08
1.63
1.85
2.35
1.94
1.89
2.21
2.44
2.00
0.2
0.7
0.9
0.7
0.8
1.0
0.7
0.8
1.0
0.8
0.7
0.9
1.0
0.7
0.9
0.0
0.8
MPG
MEAN
21.4
17-5
19.7
16.8
27.3
27.8
21.2
16.1
27.8
21.3
17.2
15.1
26.1
18.2
15.2
14.3
19.1
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE
F"EL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON
L ECON°MY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
3-193
-------
TABLE 19 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF FEDERAL SHORT TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON ALL
FAILED VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
1972 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 111 VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
NO. OF CYL.
2
4
6
8
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 - 250
251 - 350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799
2800 - 3799
3800 - 4799
4800 - 5799
2
10
14
16
8
0
14
8
28
14
7
17
12
17
19
13
1
HC
MEAN S.D.
2.93
3-75
3.23
3.61
3.09
3-16
2.87
3.71
3.16
3.00
3.60
3.72
2.98
3-73
3.51
3.92
1.4
1.1
0.9
2.0
1.1
1.2
0.7
1.6
1.2
0.6
2.0
1.1
1.1
1.8
1.1
0.0
CO
MEAN S.D.
33.59
43
27
38
25
25
30
39
25
31
36
41
27
35
39
51
.54
.50
.19
.28
.37
.43
.37
.37
.84
.46
.91
.39
.35
.36
.90
18.5
31.7
10.1
16.4
14.1
11.2
16.5
22.0
11.2
17.2
16.9
28.0
12.7
17.1
27.7
0.0
C02
MEAN S.D.
319
400
388
460
267
260
317
478
260
312
442
519
271
418
500
512
.0
.2
.7
.6
.5
.6
.4
.7
.6
.4
.2
.9
.8
.9
.0
.7
47.1
80.8
141.1
74.5
48.2
39.8
31.3
62.7
39.8
30.2
51.7
57.6
45.6
94.1
32.0
0.0
NOXC M?G
MEAN S.D. ft
1-77
2.00
2.52
1.70
1.49
1.86
2.25
1.92
1.86
2.27
1.67
2.29
1.89
1.84
2.21
2.10
0-5 23.3
0.8 18.5
0.8 -20.1
0.7 16.?
0.6 28,1
0.8 28.6
1.0 23.7
0.8 16.1
0.8 28.6
1.1 23-5
0.6 17.*
0.9 ll-'
0.9 27.*
0.8 18-3
0.9 15-5
0.0 I"-6
ALL VEHICLES
50
3.42 1.4 34.02 19.4 391.8 113.4 1.96 0.8 19-5
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
3-194
-------
TABLE 19 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF FEDERAL SHORT TEST PROCEDURE EXHAUST EMISSION REDUCTIONS
bunrniu FAJLED VEHJCLES AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
1972 MODEL- YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 111 VEHICLES
FUEL
NO. OF HC CO C02 NOXC ECONOMY
VEH IMPR *IMPR IMPR *IMPR IMPR %IMPE IMPR *IMPR IMPR *IMPR
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS 2 12.06 80.5 24.99 42.7 -44.8 -16.3 -0.35 -24.3 1.84 8.6
CHRYSLER 10 2.49 39.9 48.53 52.7 -56.2 -16.3 -0.20 -10.9 1.02 5.8
FORD 14 1.74 35.0 20.29 42.5 -29.9 -8.3 0.05 2.1 0.33 1.7
GENERAL MOTORS 16 1.73 32.4 27.08 41.5 -52.0 -12.7 0.12 6.8-0.12 -0.7
IMPORTS 8 0.02 0.6 7.07 21.8 -3.6 -1.4 0.27 15.2 0.66 2.4
NO. OF CYL.
2 0
1 14 0.21 6.2 8.93 26.0 -5.9 -2.3 0.21 10.3 0.79 2.8
6 8 4.99' 63.5 45.24 59.8 -41.9 -15.2 -0.63 -38.6 2.54 12.0
8 28 2.08 36.0 29-36 42.7 -54.0 -12.7 0.15 7.3 -0.04 -0.2
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151 14 0.21 6.2 8.93 26.0 -5.9 -2.3 0.21 10.3 0.79 2.8
151 - 250 7 2.46 45.1 45.45 58.8 -34.7 -12.5 -0.64 -39.1 2.55 12.0
251 - 350 17 3.41 48.6 32.05 46.8 -54.9 -14.2 0.18 9.7 0.21 1.2
MORE THAN 350 12 1.92 34.0 26.77 39.0 -55.9 -12.1 0.05 2.3-0.20 -1.3
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799 17 1.98 39.9 15.53 36.2 -15.4 -6.0 0.05 2.7 1.23 4.7
3800 - 4799 13 1.96 35.8 34.54 46.7 -48.7 -10.8 0.00 0.0 0.31 2.1
4800 - 5799 1 0.79 16.7 27-12 34.3 -31.4 -6.5 0.34 14.0 0.32 2.3
ALL VEHICLES 50 2.02 37.2 26.18 43.5 -38.6 -10.9 0.04 2.2 0.37 2.0
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE
FUEL ECONOMY IN. MILES PER GALLON
ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
3-195
-------
3.7.4 Two Speed Idle Test Results
Two Speed Idle emission test results for the Denver Inspection/
Maintenance Evaluation Task vehicles are presented on the eleven pages
comprising Table 20 which follows. HC data are in ppm n-hexane (NDIR)«
CO are in mole percent (NDIR); and NOX are in ppm (CL as NO).
3-196
-------
TAELE20
SUMMARY OF TWO SPEED IDLE TEST EXHAUST EMISSION RESULTS
ON PHASE 1 PASSED VEHICLES BEFDRE MAINTENANCE
DENVER
2250 RPM NEUTRAL -
IDLE NEUTRAL
MDDEL N
YEAR
1975 & 1976
AMER. MDTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MDTORS
IMPORTS
TOTAL
1974
AMER. MDTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MDTORS
IMPORTS
TOTAL
1973
AMER. MDTORS
CHJKSLER
FORD
GENERAL MDTORS
IMPORTS
TOTAL
1972
AMER. MDTORS
CHRTSLER
FORD
GENERAL MDTORS
TOTAL
ALT. VCtrivW I-M
U. UP
VEH
2
5
20
27
19
73
1
2
5
11
3
22
0
1
2
11
2
16
0
1
5
6
2
n
MEAN
35
86
25
48
30
39
105
230
98
205
46
156
75
112
48
67
60
85
415
48
97
188
o
S.D.
7
92
18
47
21
42
0
127
24
435
5
308
0
10
28
67
36
0
297
38
17
242
L
MEAN
0.04
0.32
0.59
0.81
0.53
0.62
1.25
3.45
2.64
1.56
1.31
1.93
0,28
1.95
1*26
1.92
1.37
0.60
1»35
1.88
2.32
1.66
*j
S.D.
0.01
0.41
0.83
1.25
0.45
0.92
0.00
1.63
1.28
1.65
1.44
1.56
0.00
0.78
1.19
0.67
1.09
0.00
1.04
1.66
1.52
1.34
MUft,
MEAN S.D.
280.8 240.0
214.0 61.9
79.1 32.4
145.5 94.5
79.4 39.2
118.5 85.9
348.1 0.0
249.4 52.7
186.1 63.9
132.2 74.9
134.6 97.6
165.2 87.0
871.0 0.0
275.2 132.0
98.4 57.1
117.2 66.5
171.1 204.9
471 .0 0.0
409.9 169.0
133.6 57.1
169.2 57.1
261.5 176.1
n
MEAN
32
65
49
44
62
51
220
290
193
120
123
157
165
207
104
115
122
190
189
155
235
181
o
S.D.
10
50
29
29
55
39
0
141
86
55
90
87
0
60
53
120
66
0
39
79
49
62
i
MEAN
0.03
0.78
0.48
0.21
0.91
0.50
2.40
0.63
3-24
1.86
2.97
2.24
2.50
3.50
1.32
3.60
1.95
1.50
3.02
3.27
1.77
2.84
•u
S.D.
0.02
0.95
0.46
0.49
0.68
0.63
0.00
0.39
1.30
1.31
2.67
1.57
0.00
0.42
0.93
2.69
1.44
0.00
1.26
2.01
2.16
1.67
m.
MEAN
60.6
58.3
48.6
66.5
41.3
54.3
72.1
60.6
63-3
49.8
44.8
54.2
64.1
55.1
51.2
64.1
54.1
72.1
81.1
42.4
58.6
60.7
in.
S.D.
19.1
27.9
15.5
28.7
18.7
24.7
0.0
13.5
12.9
16.5
25.1
17.1
0.0
11.3
19.1
7.1
16.8
0.0
20.0
17.7
2.1
23.9
79 164 1.06 1.24 149.5 126.4 93 76 1.25 1.43 55,0 22.4
3-197
-------
TABLE 20 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF TWO SPEED IDLE TE
ON PHASE 1 PASSED VEHICLt
DENVER
2250 RFM NEUTRAL —
EXHAUST EMISSION RESULTS
ES AFTER MAINTENANCE
IDLE NEUTRAL
MODEL NO. OF
YEAR VEH
1975 & 1976
AMER. MDTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MDTORS
IMPORTS
TOTAL
1974
AMER. MDTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MDTORS
IMPORTS
TOTAL
1973
AMER. MDTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MDTORS
IMPORTS
TOTAL
1972
AMER. MDTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MDTORS
IMPORTS
TOTAL
AT T YltftJ r/n no *
2
5
20
27
19
73
1
2
5
11
3
22
0
1
2
11
2
16
0
1
5
6
2
14
HC
MEAN S.D.
72
71
17
42
40
38
90
137
84
78
91
87
70
155
49
65
65
65
65
56
110
67
38
111
6
38
44
44
0
74
33
72
77
62
0
134
30
77
58
0
41
35
42
38
C
MEAN
0.02
0.47
0.30
0.70
0.52
0.51
1.50
2.50
2.60
1.30
0.53
1.61
0.25
1.60
0.99
0.50
0.96
0.90
0.96
1.93
2.45
1.59
0
S.D.
0.02
0.53
0.22
0.95
0.40
0.65
0.00
0.99
1.28
1.26
0.59
1.30
0.00
0.28
0.83
0.21
0.76
0.00
0.50
1.64
2.05
1.34
N(
MEAN
274.4
192.7
85.6
114.9
73.8
105.9
307.2
276.4
164.1
122.6
135.6
156.2
522.2
262.5
114.5
137.5
161.4
378.8
349.6
128.2
133.9
226.0
X
S.D.
220.1
136.9
36.0
66.4
30.5
74.9
0.0
72.4
54.1
69.1
88.2
83.4
0.0
135.5
36.2
55.6
118.4
0.0
121.6
54.6
53.6
139.0
H
MEAN
65
53
39
41
183
79
140
120
149
110
430
165
90
87
84
175
96
150
107
144
295
152
C
S.D.
7
43
21
39
445
233
0
42
66
63
447
183
0
38
41
190
68
0
73
59
77
86
C
MEAN
0.02
0.66
0.29
0.11
0.77
0.37
1.40
0.72
1.69
0.61
1.37
1.01
0.68
1.40
0.53
2.10
0.84
4.70
0.81
1.30
2.45
1.53
°c^ KX
S.D. M2AN S.D.
0.02 57.6 7.8
0.88 67.1 a.3
0.22 57.2 27.?
0.25 62.0 19.5
0.69 47.3 18.6
0.53 57.1 ZA
0.00 106.1 0,0
0.67 71.6 9.2
1.26 69.5 12.8
0.45 56.4 1?.?
1.20 49.1 tt.2
0.89 62.0 19.0
0.00 91-2 0.0
0.14 66.1 21.3
0.26 54.1 10.8
2.40 77.7 2i8
0.87 61.1 16.8
0.00 63-1 OJ
0.62 92." 3M
1.08 «f.« 19J
0.21 413 ^
1.30 63-7 V*
125
52 0.88 1.01 135.3 98.8
3-198
-------
TARE 20 OUNT'D
OF TWO SPEED IDLE TEST EXHAUST EMISSION REDUCTIONS
ON PHASE 1 PASSED VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
2250 RPM NEUTRAL
IDLE NEUTRAL-
MDDEL »
YEAR
1975 & 1976
AMER. MDTORS
CHRYSLER
PORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
TOTAL
1974
AMER. MDTORS
CHRYSLER
PORD
GENERAL MDTORS
IMPORTS
TOTAL
1973
AMSR. MDTORS
CHRYSLER
PORD
GENERAL MDTORS
IMPORTS
TOTAL
1972
AH3R. MDTORS
CHRYSLER
PORD
GENERAL MDTORS
TOTAL
ALL TOUTm r«
;. ur
VEH
2
5
20
27
19
73
1
2
5
11
3
22
0
1
2
11
2
16
0
1
5
6
2
14
no u
IMPR ?IMPR IMPR
-37.5
14.8
7.7
5.7
-10.8
1.4
15.0
92.5
14.0
126.8
-45.0
69.5
5.0
-42.5
-1.4
2.5
-5.6
20.0
350.0
-8.3
-12.5
121.1
-107 0.02
17 -0.15
30 0.28
11 0.11
-35 0.01
3 0.11
14 -0.25
40 0.95
14 0.04
61 0.26
-96 0.78
44 0.32
6 0.03
-37 0.35
-2 0.27
3 1.42
-9 0.41
23 -0.30
84 0.39
-17 -0.06
-12-0.13
64 0.08
•u
JIMPR
56.2
-46.2
48.0
13.5
2.1
17.8
-20.0
27.5
1.5
16.5
59.8
16.6
10.7
17.9
21.5
73.8
29.9
-50.0
28.9
-3.1
-5.4
4.5
1MV
IMPR
6
21
-6
30
5
12
40
-27
21
9
-0
9
348
12
-16
^20
9
92
60
5
35
35
JA no
$IMPR IMPR JIMPR
2.3
10.0
-8.3
21.0
7.0
10.6
11.8
-10.8
11.8
7.3
-0.7
5.5
40.1
4.6
-16.5
-17.4
5.7
19.6
14.7
4.1
20.9
13-6
-32.5
12.0
9.2
3-5
-121.2
-27.8
80.0
170.0
44.0
9.1
-306.7
-8.2
75.0
120.0
19.5
-60.0
25.6
40.0
82.0
11.7
-60.0
28.6
-100
18
18
7
-195
-54
36
58
22
7
-248
-5
45
57
18
-52
20
21
43
7
-25
15
i
IMPR
0.02
0.12
0.19
0.10
0.14
0.13
1.00
-0.10
1.55
1.25
1.60
1.23
1.82
2.10
0.80
1.50
1.11
-3.20
2.21
1.97
-0.68
1.31
j^>
?IMPR
50.0
15.4
40.4
47.6
15.1
26.8
41.7
-16.0
47.8
67.2
53-8
55.1
72.8
60.0
60.1
41.7
56.9
-213.3
73-2
60.2
-38.0
46.0
1MUA.
IMPR $IMPR
3 5.0
-8 -15.2
-8 -17.7
4 6.8
-5 -14.4
-2 -5.1
-33 -47-0
-11 -18.2
-6 -9.8
-6 -13.2
-4 -9.7
-7 -14.4
-27 -42.2
-11 -20.0
-3 -6.3
-13 -21.1
-6 -12.9
9 12.5
-11 -13-9
-5 -11.8
17 29.6
-3 -5.0
14 9.5 -11.2 -11 0.58 46.6 -4 -7-7
3-199
-------
TAELE 20 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF TOO SPEED IDLE TEST EXHAUST EMISSIONS
ON PHASE 1 PASSED VEHICLES
DENVER
MDDEL NO OF
YEAR VEH
1975 & 1976
AMER. MDTORS 2
CHRYSLER 5
FORD 20
GENERAL MDTOR 27
IMPORTS 19
1974
AMER. MDTORS 1
CHRYSLER 2
FORD 5
GENERAL MDTOR 11
IMPORTS 3
1973
AMER. MDTORS 0
CHRYSLER 1
FORD 2
GENERAL MDTOR 11
IMPORTS 2
1972
AMER. MDTORS 0
CHRYSLER 1
FORD 5
GENERAL MOTOR 6
IMPORTS 2
BEFORE MAINT
MDDE HC CO NOX
2250
IDLE
2250
IDLE
2250
IDLE
2250
IDLE
2250
IDLE
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
35
32
86
65
49
48
44
30
62
2250
IDLE
2250
IDLE
2250
IDLE
2250
IDLE
2250
IDLE
N
N
N
B
N
N
N
N
N
105
220
230
290
98
193
205
120
46
123
2250
IDLE
2250
IDLE
2250
IDLE
2250
IDLE
2250
IDLE
N
N
N
N
S
N
N
N
75
165
112
207
48
104
67
115
2250
IDLE
2250
IDLE
2250
IDLE
2250
IDLE
2250
IDLE
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
85
190
415
189
155
97
235
0.04
0.03
0.32
0.78
0.59
0.48
0 81
0.21
0.53
0.91
1.25
2.40
3.45
0.63
2.64
3.24
1.56
1 86
1.31
2.97
0.28
2.50
1.95
3.50
1.26
1.32
1.92
3.60
0.60
1.50
1.35
3.02
1.88
3.27
2.32
1.77
280
60
213
5o
79
4o
145
66
79
41
348
72
249
60
186
63
132
49
4
871
64
275
i
51
117
64
470
72
409
81
1
5o
MECH
AS RECVD
HC CO
32
55
97
200
48
82
139
66
172
120
180
175
490
100
242
211
127
100
170
205
49
113
85
60
200
177
216
147
302
0.00
0.01
0.59
0.50
0.40
0.42
0.33
0.24
0.87
1.73
1.50
1.10
2.60
0.35
2 68
1.06
1.95
1-53
2.80
0.20
2.00
1.05
1.85
0.62
1.45
1.35
0.15
0.20
1.21
2.61
1.49
4.27
2.15
1.40
MECH AFTER
TUNE UP
HC CO
30
60
64
155
35
54
60
65
83
110
250
100
110
70
124
74
107
180
80
70
125
120
60
60
50
60
62
100
147
190
0.00
0.00
0.61
0.31
0.20
0.25
0.20
0.04
0.36
0.75
1.30
0.50
1.60
0.55
1.51
0.78
0.83
0.29
0.71
1.62
0.20
0.50
0.90
0.27
o"8o
1*.20
0.15
0.55
0.51
0.52
0.58
1.12
2.10
2.70
AFTER MMNT
TEST2
HC 00 i(
72
65
71
53
17
39
42
41
40
183
90
140
137
120
84
149
7Q
y
110
91
430
70
90
'1?
49
84
65
175
65
150
65
144
110
295
0.02 27-
0.02 ^
0.47 152
0.66 fc
0.30 fe
0.29 ?
0.70 Hi
0.11 6i
0.52 f<
0.77 S
1.50 jOl
1 40 ff
2.50 2il
0.72 71
2.60 lo-
1.69 c;
1.30 122
0.61 5&
0.53 $
1.37 "?
0.25 52
0.68 -i
1.60 £
1.40 «
0.99 '*"
0.53 >
0.50 V
2.10 /•
0.90 £
4.70 y-
0.96 %
- Q* y
0.81 •:•
1.93 ^
2.45
EMISSION RESULTS ARE : HC PPM HEXANE, CO MOLE %t NOX PPM
3-200
-------
TAELE 20 OONT'D
SUMMARY OF TWO SPEED IDLE TEST EXHAUST EMISSION RESULTS
ON ALL PHASE 1 VEHICLES BEFORE MAINTENANCE
DENVER
2250 RPM NEUTRAL IDLE NEUTRAL -
MDDEL N
YEAR
"l97r& 1976
AMER. MDTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MDTORS
IMPORTS
TOTAL
1974
AMER. MDTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MDTORS
IMPORTS
TOTAL
1973
AMSR. MDTORS
CHRYSLER
PORD
GENERAL MDTORS
IMPORTS
TOTAL
1972
AMER. MDTORS
CHRYSLER
PORD
GENERAL MDTORS
IMPORTS
TOTAL
ALL Ul?UTPrn«
U. ur
VEH
6
15
25
40
26
112
1
4
7
13
5
30
1
3
• 6
12
5
27
1
3
6
11
4
25
*
n
MEAN
52
79
31
79
55
61
105
170
105
196
85
149
900
148
140
56
113
127
2000
163
679
74
100
311
u
S.D.
17
78
29
69
67
63
0
102
25
398
54
264
0
84
43
40
80
167
0
95
699
59
24
541
V.
MEAN
0.95
0.93
0.93
1.61
1.07
1.21
1.25
2.52
2.94
1.93
2.43
2.31
0.90
2.09
3-40
1.53
2.51
2.16
3-60
3.13
1.71
2.22
1.94
2.22
AJ
S.D.
0.81
0.91
1.81
1.86
1.86
1.71
0.00
1.42
1.22
1.78
2.75
1.76
0.00
1.68
1.93
1.47
1.33
1.66
0.00
2.66
1.28
1.70
1.16
1.60
1V-/A
MEAN S.D.
421.2 199.0
255.2 135.2
86.8 42.1
134.5 86.7
90.9 51.6
145.2 122.4
348.1 0.0
356.9 242.4
180.2 55.3
185.8 214.0
114.3 76.4
200.8 179-1
634.8 0.0
523.0 318.0
229.6 135.7
101.7 55.7
121.1 41.5
200.3 195.1
450.5 0.0
358.3 103.9
426.9 156.8
154.3 58.6
162.3 34.7
257.3 154.9
n
MEAN
112
180
80
112
126
117
220
282
225
134
402
222
305
261
280
117
290
208
2000
453
294
365
590
460
Vy V.
S.D. MEAN
69 2.06
108 3-82
113 1.33
123 1-35
230 1.56
150 1.76
0 2.40
84 4.04
104 4.43
64 2.62
514 3.18
225 3-32
0 6.10
122 6.00
117 6.37
68 1.76
215 4.66
141 3-95
0 8.00
405 6.80
259 3-92
338 5.04
553 4.66
475 5.04
AJ
S.D.
1.78
2.73
2.22
2.00
1.54
2.19
0.00
3-96
2.39
2.23
3.01
2.60
0.00
3.10
2.70
1.76
3-75
3-15
0.00
4.62
2.47
2.87
3-56
3-03
IMV.
MEAN
96.9
49.2
45.9
61.2
47.7
55.0
72.1
62.4
58.4
53-6
39-3
54.1
63.1
56.1
48.3
53.4
58.5
53-9
47.1
40.4
74.5
43.2
63.1
53.7
1A.
S.D.
40.7
20.2
17.1
27.6
21.6
26.6
0.0
11.5
13-9
19.4
24.3
18.8
0.0
7.0
13-1
19.8
12.7
15.6
0.0
30.6
24.2
17.5
12.3
23-3
194 116 244 1.64 1.76 175.9 152.1 190 253 2.73 2.78 54.5 23.7
3-201
-------
MDDEL
YEAR
TAELE 20 CQNT'D
OF TWD SPEED IDLE TEST EXHAUST EMISSION RESULTS
'ON ALL PHASE 1 VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
2250 RPM NEUTRAL IDLE NEUTRAL
NO. OF HC CO NOX HC CO NQX
VEH MEAN S.D. MEAN S.D. MEAN S.D. MEAN S.D. MEAN S.D. M5AN SB
1975 & 1976
AMER. MDTORS 6 57
CHRYSLER 15 49
FORD 25 17
GENERAL MDTORS 40 60
IMPORTS 26 54
TOTAL 112 48
1974
AMER. MDTORS 1 90
CHRYSLER 4 120
FORD 7 93
GENERAL MDTORS 13 83
IMPORTS 5 88
TOTAL 30 91
1973
AMSR. MDTORS 1 80
CHRYSLER 3 96
FORD 6 137
GENERAL MDTORS 12 55
IMPORTS 5 139
TOTAL 27 94
1972
AMER. MDTORS 1 130
CHRYSLER 3 101
FORD 6 70
GENERAL MDTORS 11 50
IMPORTS 4 520
TOTAL 25 139
22 0.92 0.78 290.3 148.5
67 0.69 0.69 242.1 125.8
6 0.32 0.21 81.6 34.7
47 1.20 1.33 113.9 61.2
61 0.60 0.52 91.9 62.3
50 0.78 0.95 128.2 97-4
0 1.50 0.00 307.2 0.0
47 1.82 0.97 368.6 115.5
31 2.97 1.31 161.6 46.5
69 1.55 1.33 154.8 135.3
64 1.60 2.18 120.3 66.2
56 1.92 1.48 184.2 128.2
0 2.10 0.00 197.0 0.0
41 1.42 1.03 490.7 314.5
101 2.68 1.69 327.6 138.1
35 1.34 1.45 116.6 35.2
126 2.02 1.58 112.4 42.3
81 1.80 1.49 207.2 173-8
0 2.65 0.00 348.1 0.0
35 0.60 0.33 334.5 52.5
39 1.32 0.98 337.4 112.8
27 1.82 1.39 150.2 72.1
820 1.85 1.57 129.7 66.2
337 1.59 1.24 221.9 122.3
76 30 0.88 1.11 90.9 33,2
57 47 0.86 1.01 55.6 23,1
43 29 0.32 0.26 56.8 a?
50 64 0.22 0.49 61.6 21.1
191 407 1.05 1.11 51.2 21.1
84 207 0.56 0.83 58.9 »,|
140 0 1.40 0.00 106.1 0.0
101 32 0.79 0.54 99.0 37.0
130 62 1.56 1.19 71.1 11.6
114 60 0.89 0.88 61.6 23.2
458 382 0.93 1.04 43.1 18.2
174 198 1.06 0.94 67.2 ZM
150 0 0.80 0.00 73-2 0.0
90 0 0.54 0.25 88.3 W
120 35 1.27 0.82 73-3 &'
89 43 0.67 0.54 57-2 1«
328 280 1.43 1-44 60.5 23-'
142 146 0.93 0.84 65-l» ^
155 0 2.40 0.00 92.2 0.0
313 336 1.79 2.52 57-5 u
110 65 1.11 0.92 86.5 35.2
163 128 1.49 1.12 62.0 M
682 714 2.26 1.27 50.7 ®
251 348 1.60 1.26 66.7 **
ALL VEHICLES 194 72 134 1.20 1.26 159.9123.8 127 228 0.82 0.97 62.1*'
3-202
-------
TABLE 20 OONT'D
SIMWRY OF TOD SPEED IDLE TEST EXHAUST EMISSION REDUCTIONS
ON ALL PHASE 1 VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
2250 RPM NEUTRAL
IDLE NEUTRAL
MDDEL N
YEAR
"1975 & 1976
AMER. MDTORS
CHRYSLER
PORD
GENERAL MDTORS
IMPORTS
TOTAL
1971
AMER. MDTORS
CHRYSLER
PORD
GENERAL MDTORS
IMPORTS
TOTAL
1973
AMER. MDTORS
CHRYSLER
PORD
GENERAL MDTORS
IMPORTS
TOTAL
1972
AMSR. MDTORS
CHRlfSLER
PORD
GENERAL MDTORS
IMPORTS
TOTAL
ALL wnirnt r«
U. Ul
VEH
6
15
25
40
26
112
1
4
7
13
5
30
1
3
6
12
5
27
3
6
11
4
25
• no
IMPR JIMPR
-5.0
29.3
13.4
18.7
1.9
13.8
15.0
50.0
11.4
113.1
-3-0
58.3
820.0
51.7
2.5
1.3
-26.0
32.4
,0.0
61.7
609.2
24.5
-420.0
172.0
-9
36
42
23
3
22
14
29
10
57
-3
38
91
34
1
2
-23
25
93
37
89
32
-419
55
\
IMPR
0.03
0.23
0.61
0.41
0.46
0.42
-0.25
0.70
-0.03
0.38
0.83
0.38
-1.20
0.68
0.72
0.19
0.49
0.36
0.95
2.53
0.39
0.40
0.08
0.62
JU
5&IMPR
3.4
25.3
65.9
25.5
43.5
35.2
-20.0
27.7
-1.0
19.8
34.2
16.6
-133.3
32.3
21.1
12.4
19.4
16.8
26.4
80.9
22.9
17.8
4.3
28.1
rw
IMPR
130
13
5
20
-1
17
40
-11
18
30
-5
16
437
32
-97
-14
8
-6
102
23
89
4
32
35
JA.
jHMPR
31-1
5.1
5.9
15-3
-1.2
11.7
11.8
-3-3
10.3
16.7
-5.2
8.2
69.0
6.2
-42.7
-14.6
7-2
-3-5
22.7
6.7
21.0
2.6
20.1
13.8
nv>
IMPR %
35.8
123.0
36.9
62.0
-65.0
33.7
80.0
181.2
94.3
19.6
-56.0
48.0
155.0
171.7
160.0
27.5
-38.0
65.6
1845.0
140.0
184.2
202.3
-92.5
209.0
/ \.
IIMPR IMPR
31 1.18
68 2.96
45 1.00
54 1.13
-51 0.52
28 1 .21
36 1.00
64 3-25
41 2.87
14 1.72
-13 2.25
21 2.26
50 5-30
65 5.46
56 5.10
23 1.10
-13 3.23
31 3-02
92 5.60
30 5.01
62 2.81
55 3.55
-15 2.40
45 3.44
AJ
£EMPR
57.1
77.6
75.6
83.6
33-0
68.4
41.7
80.5
64.7
65.8
70.7
68.1
86.9
90.9
80.1
62.2
69.3
76.4
70.0
73.6
71.7
70.4
51.5
68.3
1MUA
IMPR $IMPR
6 6.3
-6 -13-0
-10 -23-7
-0 -0.6
-3 -7.3
-3 -7.1
-33 -47.0
-36 -58.6
-12 -21.8
-8 -15.0
-3 -9.7
-13 -24.2
-10 -15-9
-32 -57.3
-25 -51.9
-3 -7.1
-2 -3.4
-11 -21.5
-45 -95.7
-17 -42.1
-12 -16.2
-18 -43.6
12 19-7
-13 -24.3
37 0.44 26.5 15 9.1 62.9 32 1.91 69.9 -7-13-9
3-203
-------
TAELE 20 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF TVIO SPEED IDLE TEST EXHAUST EMISSIONS
ON ALL PHASE 1 VEHICLES
DENVER
MDDEL NO OF
YEAR VEH
1975 & 1976
AMER. MDTORS 6
CHRYSLER 15
FORD 25
GENERAL MDTOR 40
IMPORTS 26
1974
AMER. MOTORS 1
CHRYSLER 4
FORD 7
GENERAL MDTOR 13
IMPORTS 5
1973
AMER. MDTORS 1
CHRYSLER 3
FORD 6
GENERAL MDTOR 12
IMPORTS 5
1972
AMER. MDTORS 1
CHRYSLER 3
FORD 6
GENERAL MDTOR 11
IMPORTS 4
BEFORE MAINT MECH MECH AFTER AFTER MABfT
TEST 1 AS RECVD TUNE UP TEST 2
MDDE HC CO NOX HC CO HC CO HC 00 Q
2250 N
1DLEN
2250 N
1DLEN
2250 N
1DLEN
2250N
1DLEN
2250 N
1DLEN
52
112
79
31
80
79
112
55
126
2250N
1DLEN
2250 N
1DLEN
2250 N
1DLEN
2250 N
1DLEN
2250N
1DLEN
105
220
170
282
105
225
196
85
402
2250 N
1DLEN
2250 N
1DLEN
2250 N
1DLEN
2250 N
1DLEN
2250 N
1DLEN
900
305
148
261
140
280
56
117
113
290
2250(N
1DLEN
2250CN
1DLECN
2250CN
1DLECN
2250CN
1DLECN
2250CN
1DLE(N
2000
2000
163
453
679
294
74
365
100
590
0.95 421 59 0.65 54 0.38 57 0.92 250
2.06 96 12$ 1.50 107 0.37 76 0.88 (J
0.93 255 146 1.24 65 0.50 49 0.69 2$
3.82 49 229 3-32 102 0.27 57 0.86 55
0.93 86 52 0.60 34 0.20 17 0.32 8
1-33 45 103 1-12 56 0.24 43 0.32 %
1.61 134 138 0.72 68 0.45 60 1.20 11]
1.35 61 203 0.92 73 0.06 50 0.22 61
1.07 90 75 0.89 60 0.45 54 0.60 91
1.56 47 170 1.82 86 0.88 191 1.05 51
1.25 348 120 1.50 110 1.30 90 1.50 3DI
2.40 72 180 1.10 250 0.50 140 1.40 1
2.52 356 167 1.88 97 1.10 120 1.82 $
4.04 62 405 3-52 92 0.52 101 0.79 $
2.94 180 110 2.47 90 2.09 93 2.97 161
4.43 58 258 3.20 123 0.89 130 1.56 71
1.93 185 195 1.12 83 0.95 83 1.55 #
2.62 53 140 2.67 108 0.37 114 0.89 il
2.43 114 111 2.40 95 1.48 88 1.60 120
3-18 39 '210 2.76 218 1.41 458 0.93 fl
0.90 634 1350 0.80 40 1.00 80 2.10 19j
6.10 63 360 7.20 150 1.20 150 0.80 fl
2.09 523 123 1.43 96 0.53 96 1.12 W
6.00 56 250 3.24 90 0.32 90 0.54 »
3.40 229 140 2.78 136 2.00 137 2.68 3a
6.37 48 305 5.08 140 0.64 120 1.27 ]}
1.53 101 60 0.98 66 0.92 55 1-31* 'J
1.76 53 127 1.87 100 0.41 89 0.67 »
2.51 121 126 2.42 118 1.80 139 2.02 1J
4.66 58 276 4.84 156 1.50 328 1.43 w
3.60 450 2000 2.60 130 1.80 130 2.65 3*
8.00 47 2000 7.00 140 1.00 155 2.40 1
3-13 358 273 3-38 93 0.67 101 0.60 W
6.80 40 593 5.40 95 0.82 313 -B |
1.71 426 430 1.31 61 0.58 70 -32 $
3-92 74 322 3-31 130 0.60 110 -J1 $
2.22 154 99 1.95 50 0.79 50 -g '§
5.04 43 328 5;22 141 1.1? 163 -g J
1.94 162 171 1.70 251 1.65 520 1-5 $
4.66 63 588 3-35 177 2.32 682 2.26 5"
EMISSION RESULTS ARE : HC PPM HEXANE, CO MOLE %, NOX PPM
3-20A
-------
TABLE 20 OONT'D
SUMMARY OF TWO SPEED IDLE TEST EXHAUST EMISSION RESULTS
ON ALL FAILED VEHICLES BEFORE MAINTENANCE
DENVER
2250 RPM NEUTRAL —
IDLE NEUTRAL
MDDEL W
YEAR
"l975 & 1976
AMER. MDTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MDTORS
IMPORTS
TOTAL
1974
AMER. MDTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MDTORS
IMPORTS
TOTAL
1973
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MDTORS
IMPORTS
TOTAL
1972
AMSR. MDTORS
CHRYSLER
PORD
G£NERAL MDTORS
IMPORTS
TOTAL
ALL VBVTPr rw
j. ur
9
29
16
56
14
124
1
6
8
9
7
31
2
13
14
12
12
53
2
10
14
16
8
50
n
MEAN
62
119
53
122
121
108
90
472
399
140
142
270
465
328
237
150
154
229
1700
297
595
126
144
357
^/
S.D.
22
169
49
108
80
115
0
753
649
114
78
469
615
381
277
120
102
269
424
427
652
185
49
525
MEAN
2.07
1.20
1.68
3.25
3.16
2.47
4.00
1.65
3-74
3.28
4.17
3-31
0.70
2.93
4.00
2.39
3.18
3.06
3.30
3.00
2.82
2.20
2.67
2.65
*j
S.D.
1.54
1.15
2.43
1.98
2.72
2.12
0.00
0.49
2.71
1.90
3.05
2.32
0.28
1.94
1.73
1.67
2.11
1.93
0.42
1.56
1.91
1.53
1.54
1.61
L1UA.
MEAN S.D.
323.4 214.0
268.1 138.9
87.1 43.4
106.0 52.0
113-4 59.3
158.1 127.1
126.3 0.0
386.4 233.6
235.7 214.9
190.8 253.3
89.6 35.8
215.3 217.6
351.5 400.7
287.1 190.5
168.6 100.5
139.8 86.6
107.3 26.8
184.2 146.1
399.3 72.4
272.4 82.3
235.0 156.0
157.6 67.0
144.1 69.8
209.7 118.0
n
MEAN
145
264
174
266
273
246
460
321
311
503
474
410
240
392
463
510
578
474
1750
472
693
560
510
619
o
S.D.
67
188
201
153
298
187
0
167
162
574
422
377
91
492
460
494
365
442
353
399
549
410
375
494
V.
MEAN
3-70
5.57
3-25
4.75
4.21
4.61
9.80
6.30
6.09
5.39
4.34
5.65
5.65
5.03
7.19
4.56
5.52
5.63
5.00
7.37
5.36
7.19
6.94
6.59
AJ
S.D.
2.19
2.27
3.13
2.39
2.28
2.52
0.00
2.13
3.08
3.53
4.22
3.31
0.64
2.83
1.92
3.03
3.27
2.83
4.24
2.16
3.50
2.32
1.99
2.74
11*.
MEAN
84.1
42.7
37.0
46.8
57.8
48.5
24.0
50.3
44.3
53.3
42.1
46.9
43.6
46.0
49.4
50.4
42.8
47.1
66.5
34.9
50.6
42.7
51.9
45.8
in.
S.D.
43-0
15.4
14.7
22.1
24.6
24.7
0.0
19.5
16.9
25.6
30.7
23.1
27.6
15.4
15.4
27.8
20.1
19.7
27.4
14.8
21.9
17.0
16.7
19.2
330 2.73 2.03 180.3 144.2 385 376 5.33 2.82 47.5 22.5
3-205
-------
TABLE 20 OONT'D
SUMMARY OF WO SPEED IDLE TEST EXHAUST EMISSION RESULTS
ON ALL FAILED VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE
MDDEL
YEAR
DENVER
2250 RPM NEUTRAL
NO. OF HC 00 NOX
VEH MEAN S.D. MEAN S.D. MEAN S.D.
IDLE NEUTRAL .
HC CO NOX
MEAN S.D. MEAN S.D. MEftN SD
1975 & 1976
AMER. MDTORS 9 55
CHRYSLER 29 38
FORD 16 32
GENERAL MDTORS 56 89
14 72
124 65
13 2.05 1.61 234.7 113.8' 78
33 0.86 1.00 223-5 122.0 55
36 0.80 1.18 80.8 74.7 68
99 2.37 1.79 100.4 56.7 68
67 1.17 1.01 130.0 70.1 200
76 1.66 1.62 139.7 101.7 80
34 1.01 0.81 99.3 38.2
53 0.82 1.00 53.2 26.2
44 0.55 0.47 50.9 1?.2
88 0.58 1.12 66.7 33.2
262 1.58 1.41 71.5 35.?
116 0.78 1.08 6M 32.7
1 115 0 3-80 0.00 171.7 0.0
6 220 277 1.77 0.92 377.0 169-6
8 287 239 3.47 2.04 179-5 116.2
9 103 66 2.09 1.70 159-3 152.0
7 104 86 3.54 1.93 98.6 29.9
31 174 188 2.77 1.81 193-3 153.4
140 0 1.40 0.00 54.1 0.0
157 145 1.03 0.63 87.2 fc?
179 109 1.91 1.25 61.9 18.6
361 616 1.27 1-49 60.2 231
256 260 1.84 1.56 50.1 23-3
244 358 1.52 1.28 63.*» 2B.»
2 55 35 1.22 1.24 166.7 42.9
13 143 87 2.58 1.90 318.4215-5
14 185 235 3-26 1.65 214.5 129.1
12 120 79 2.51 1.45 127-3 47.6
12 135 88 2.78 1.58 100.2 19.6
53 143 139 2.74 1.64 192.6 150.1
2 230 141 3-13 0-67 327.6 29.0
10 105 48 1.54 1.46 274.2 113.4
14 151 100 2.02 1.19 296.5 138.6
16 97 137 2.31 1.23 142.3 60.2
8 316 580 2.59 1.71 138.2 86.1
50 154 251 2.15 1.35 218.6 124.3
192 60 0.63 0.24 65.6 10.6
209 317 1-00 0.85 66.6 17.5
210 228 1.41 1.33 64.6 133
558 766 1.14 0.77 82.7 38.1
521 514 2.33 1-49 50.0 11-2
358 494 1.43 1.22 65-9 2«
212 81 3.60 1.70 75-7 23-'
231 199 1.26 2.06 66.1 13-1
227 254 1.99 1-33 65-7 lM
220 197 2.11 1.61 61.7 23-2
485 517 2.64 3-18 55-9 <6J
266 290 2.05 1-96 63-3 lM
ALL VEHICLES 258 112 158 2.11 1.66 172.3127.6 193 316 1.25 1.42
3-206
-------
TABLE 20 OONT'D
SUWARY OF TWO SPEED IDLE TEST EXHAUST EMISSION REDUCTIONS
ON ALL FAILED VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
- - • c.r.j\j iv n ivi^jiiuu-i — — — —
vnntL NO. OF HC CO NOX
ygjjj-l VEH IMPR y&IMPR IMPR JIMPR IMPR 5&IMPR
1975 & 1976
AMER. MDTORS
CHRYSLER
PORD
GENERAL MDTORS
IMPORTS
TOTAL
1971
AM5R. MDTORS
CHRYSLER
PORD
GENERAL MDTORS
IMPORTS
TOTAL
1973
AMER. MDTORS
CHRYSLER
PORD
GENERAL MDTORS
IMPORTS
TOTAL
1972
AMER. MDTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MDTORS
IMPORTS
TOTAL
ALL VFttrn DC.
9
29
16
56
14
124
1
6
8
9
7
31
2
13
14
12
12
53
2
10
14
16
8
50
6.7
80.9
20.4
33.2
48.9
42.5
-25-0
251.7
111.9
36.1
38.6
96.0
410.0
184.6
52.5
30.4
19.1
85.8
1470.0
192.5
443.4
29.1
-172.5
203.2
10
67
38
27
40
39
-27
53
28
25
26
35
88
56
22
20
12
37
86
64
74
22
-119
56
0.02
0.33
0.88
0.87
1.99
0.81
0.20
-0.12
0.28
1.19
0.62
0.54
-0.52
0.35
0.74
-0.12
0.40
0.33
0.18
1.46
0.79
-0.11
0.09
0.50
0.9
27.8
52.3
26.9
63.1
32.9
5.0
-7.0
7.4
36.3
15.0
16.4
-75.0
12.1
18.6
-5.0
12.6
10.7
5.3
48.7
28.1
-5.1
3.2
18.8
88 27.4
44 16.6
6 7.2
5 5.3
-16 -14.7
18 11.6
-45 -36.0
9 2.4
56 23.9
31 16.5
-9 -10.1
21 10.2
184 52.6
-31 -10.9
-45 -27.2
12 9.0
7 6.6
-8 -4.6
71 17.9
-1 -0.7
-61 -26.2
15 9.7
5 4.1
-6 -4.2
HC
IMPR JIMPR
66.7
209.0
105.9
198.0
73-4
165.1
320.0
164.2
131.9
142.2
217-9
166.6
47.5
182.7
253-2
-47.5
57.1
115.7
1537.5
241.0
465.4
339.7
25.0
352.7
45
78
60
74
26
67
69
51
42
28
45
40
19
46
54
-9
9
24
87
51
67
60
4
56
-LJA-UJ I1UU1IIML.
CO
IMPR JIMPR
2.69
4.75
2.70
4.18
2.63
3.84
8.40
5.27
4.18
4.12
2.50
4.13
5.02
4.03
5.79
3.42
3.19
4.20
1.40
6.11
3-37
5.08
4.29
4.53
72.8
85-3
83.1
87.8
62.5
83.2
85.7
83.6
68.6
76.4
57.7
73.1
88.8
80.1
80.4
75.1
57.7
74.7
28.0
82.9
62.8
70.6
61.9
68.8
NOX
IMPR $IMPR
-15 -18.1
-10 -24.5
-13 -37.6
-19 -42.5
-13 -23.8
-15 -32.7
-30 -124
-36 -73-4
-17 -39.5
-6 -12.9
-8 -19.0
-16 -35.0
-22 -50.6
-20 -44.7
-15 -30.9
-32 -64.0
-7 -17.0
-18 -40.1
-9 -13.8
-31 -89.7
-15 -29.8
-18 -44.4
-4 -7.7
-17 -38.4
44 0.62 22.7 8 4.4 191.5 49 4.08 76.6 -16-35.6
3-207
-------
TABLE 20 OONT'D
SUMMARY OF TWO SPEED IDLE TEST EXHAUST EMISSIONS
ON ALL FAILED VEHICLES
DENVER
MDDEL NO OF
YEAR VEH
1975 & 1976
AMER. MDTORS 9
CHRYSLER 29
FORD 16
GENERAL MDTOR 56
IMPORTS 14
1974
AMER. MDTORS 1
CHRYSLER 6
FORD 8
GENERAL MDTOR 9
IMPORTS 7
1973
AMSR. MDTORS 2
CHRYSLER 13
FORD 14
GENERAL MDTOR 12
IMPORTS 12
1972
AMER. MDTORS 2
CHRYSLER 10
FORD 14
GENERAL MDTOR 16
IMPORTS 8
BEFORE MAINT
MODE HC CO NOX
2250
IDLE
2250
IDLE
2250
IDLE
2250
IDLE
2250
IDLE
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
62
145
264
53
174
122
266
121
273
2250
IDLE
2250
IDLE
2250
IDLE
2250
IDLE
2250
IDLE
N
N
S
N
N
N
N
N
N
90
460
472
399
311
140
503
142
474
2250
IDLE
2250
IDLE
2250
IDLE
2250
IDLE
2250
IDLE
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
465
240
328
392
1
510
154
578
2250
IDLE
2250
IDLE
2250
IDLE
2250
IDLE
2250
IDLE
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
i
N
1700
1750
297
472
595
693
126
560
144
510
2.07
3-70
1.20
5»57
1.68
3.25
I'25
3J6
4.21
4.00
9 80
1.65
6.30
I
5.'39
4.17
4.34
0.70
5.65
2.93
5.03
4.00
7.19
2.39
4 56
3*. 18
5.52
J • JW
3^00
7.37
2.82
5.36
2.20
7.19
6.'94
323
84
268
42
87
36
113
57
126
24
386
50
235
44
190
42
IP
287
46
168
49
139
50
107
42
399
272
34
if?
144
51
MECH
AS RECVD
HC CO
03
181
149
376
92
228
148
303
113
181
120
700
299
325
353
168
291
240
415
213
379
179
285
783
1050
1256
6i5
135
447
205
603
1.06
3.06
1.23
5.23
1.47
3.26
2.19
4.07
2.04
3.28
3.80
10.00
2.28
3.82
5.50
1.79
5.33
3.74
4.53
0.55
6.40
2.05
4.65
3.14
6.45
2.63
5.17
3.18
5.91
1.80
4.75
3.01
7.87
1.85
4.17
1.67
6.28
2.41
6.47
MECH AFTER
TUNE UP
HC CO
75
121
56
72
45
66
82
101
60
140
flf
120
363
50
220
192
204
103
153
385
235
180
119
185
251
122
265
215
351
1.30
0.57
0.50
0.23
0.62
0.22
1^\f~
•f)
0.16
1.32
1.47
2.50
1.50
1.20
0.90
2.79
0.98
1.42
0.76
3.27
1.61
0.70
0.85
1.46
i!o4
2.31
0.79
2.62
2.24
1.25
1.05
1.19
1 .48
1*23
1/13
2.29
1.75
AFTER mm
HC co2 n
55
78
38
55
32
68
89
72
200
115
140
220
287
179
103
361
104
256
55
192
143
209
185
210
120
558
135
521
230
212
105
231
151
227
97
220
316
485
2.05 2|
1.01 9
0.86 223
0.82 5
0.80 80
0.55 50
2.37 100
0.5$ ft
1.17 130
1.5$ 11
3.80 171
1.10 $
1.77 $
1.03 to
3.17 IT)
1.91 61
2.09 155
1.27 ffl
3.51 98
1.81 5)
1.22 1ft
0.63 ffi
2.58 3|
1.00 ft
3.26 2
1.11 »
i!ii jj
2.78 'S
2.33 50
313 $
<* fn Vi
3.60 "
1*9fi ft
$
2.02 ty
J'ai I*
£-2J 61
2.11 0^
EMISSION RESULTS ARE : HC PPM HEXANE, CO MOLE *, NOX PPM
3-208
-------
, 5 federal Three Mode Test Results and Converter Efficiency Test
Results
Results from the Federal Three Mode Test are summarized In the
168 pages comprising Tahle 21 which follows. The latter part of Tahle 21
(beginning on page 3-354) contains summary data on the results of the
Converter Efficiency Test. This latter part includes before and after
converter emission data and emission improvement (reduction) data
attributed to the catalytic converter.
3-209
-------
TABLE 21
SUMMARY OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON PHASE 1
PASSED VEHICLES BEFORE MAINTENANCE
MODE : 50 MPH
DENVER
1975 & 1976 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 112 VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
VEHICLE
MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL
IMPORTS
NO. OF
2
4
6
8
MOTORS
CYL.
2
5
20
27
19
2
17
11
43
HC
MEAN S.D.
45
64
50
86
99
5
109
71
69
.0
.0
.8
.9
.0
.0
.5
.1
.7
21.2
40.1
39.3
46.6
66.1
7.1
61.3
50.8
44.4
CO
MEAN S.D.
0.07
1.07
1.53
1.96
2.02
0.12
2.39
1.93
1.52
0.04
0.74
1.26
1.54
1.81
0.11
1.74
1.62
1.34
NOX
MEAN S.D.
1827.3
1237.9
742.1
879.6
1063.2
368.6
1158.1
830.1
908.8
1498.3
416.6
343.7
367.8
610.8
86.9
590.8
525.1
453.0
02
MEAN S.D,
2.40
1.86
2.30
1.08
2.77
2.20
2.88
1.48
1.69
0.85
1.65
1.7T
1.24
1.15
0.5?
1.61
1.1?
1.61
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 -
251 -
250
350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA
1800 -
2800 -
3800 -
4800 -
WEIGHT
2799
3799
4799
5799
19
11
19
24
17
19
27
10
98
71
87
55
101
73
75
49
.5
.1
.4
.7
.2
.3
.6
.8
66.6
50.8
40.6
43.0
68.3
43.4
49.4
33.3
2.15
1.93
1.84
1.27
1.97
1.83
1.74
1.23
1.79
1.62
1.47
1.19
1.86
1.57
1.40
1.09
1075.0
830.1
914.9
904.0
1116.6
807.2
970.9
810.2
610.4
525.1
417.2
488.4
624.5
444.0
515.9
305.0
2.81
1.48
1.34
1.96
2.77
2.01
1.56
1.45
1.53
1.17
1.33
1.75
1.1?
1.52
1.67
1.11
ALL VEHICLES
73
77.4 52.7 1.74 1.51 940.2 508.3 1-95
1,6
EMISSION RESULTS ARE : HC PPM HEXANE , CO MOLE % ,NOX PPM , 02 %
3-210
-------
TABLE 21 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON PHASE 1
iu" PASSED VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE
MODE : 50 MPH
DENVER
1975 & 1976 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 112 VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
NO. OF CYL.
2
1)
6
8
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 - 250
251 - 350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799
2800 - 3799
3800 - 4799
"800 - 5799
ALL VEHICLES
EMISSION RESULTS
2
5
20
27
19
2
17
11
43
19
11
19
24
17
19
27
10
73
ARE
HC
MEAN S.D.
45.
57.
35.
75.
90.
25.
96.
65.
56.
89.
65.
74.
41.
95.
58.
62.
42.
66.
0
0
5
7
0
0
8
7
3
2
7
7
8
9
3
3
0
3
: HC PPM
7.1
41.8
24.8
47.0
64.2
21.2
64.7
47.5
41.0
65.2
47-5
41.0
35.4
65.4
40.6
44.7
35.4
50.5
HEXANE
CO
MEAN S.D.
0.05
1.14
1.03
2.02
2.10
0.16
2.44
1.65
1.41
2.20
1.65
1.46
1.37
2.18
1.39
1.45
1.82
1.66
0.07
1.36
0.70
1.73
1.86
0.12
1.75
1.65
1.42
1.80
1.65
1.22
1.58
1.94
1.46
1.14
2.09
1.57
, CO MOLE %
NOX
MEAN S.
1712.4
858.0
643.9
845.1
949.3
289.4
991-9
729.1
836.9
918.0
729.1
902.2
785.2
998.4
670.4
938.0
641.3
841.8
1379
475
337
384
545
169
553
349
473
568
349
440
500
556
308
538
304
481
,NOX PPM ,
D.
.3
.8
.3
.0
.6
.9
.6
.1
.0
.4
.1
.3
.6
.9
.4
.7
.9
.4
02
02
MEAN S.D.
2.30
2.02
2.26
0.83
2.71
2.75
2.63
1.24
1.63
2.64
1.24
1.08
2.06
2.83
1.55
1.48
1.63
1.83
,
0.14-
1.79
1.38
0.98
1.34
0.92
1.51
1.10
1 .42
1.44
1.10
1.27
1.41
1.37
1.28
1.49
1.23
1.45
3-211
-------
TABLE 21 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST PROCEDURE EXHAUST EMISSION REDUCTIONS
ON PHASE 1 PASSED VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE
MODE : 50 MPH
DENVER
1975 & 1976 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 112 VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
VEHICLE
MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL
IMPORTS
NO. OF
2
4
6
8
MOTORS
CYL.
2
5
20
27
19
2
17
11
43
IMPR
0.0
7.0
15.2
11.1
9.0
-20.0
12.7
5.5
13.4
HC
JIMPR
0.0
10.9
30.0
12.8
9.1
-400.0
11.6
7.7
19.2
IMPR
0.02
-0.07
0.51
-0.07
-0.08
-0.04
-0.06
0.27
0.11
CO
JIMPR
25
-6
33
-3
-3
-32
-2
14
6
.00
.17
.03
.50
.88
.00
.37
.09
.96
NOX
IMPR 5&IMPR
114.9
379.9
98.2
34.5
113.8
79.2
166.2
101.0
71.9
6.3
30.7
13.2
3.9
10.7
21.5
14.4
12.2
7.9
IMPR
0.10
-0.16
0.04
0.25
0.06
-0.55
0.25
0.24
0.06
02
flim
1.1?
-8.60
1.85
23.29
2.28
-25.00
8.59
16.31
3.45
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 -
251 -
250
350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA
1800 -
2800 -
3800 -
4800 -
WEIGHT
2799
3799
4799
5799
19
11
19
24
17
19
27
10
9.3
5.5
12.6
14.0
5.4
15.0
13.2
7.8
9.4
7.7
14.5
25.0
5.3
20.5
17.5
15.7
-0.05
0.27
0.37
-0.11
-0.21
0.43
0.28
-0.59
-2
14
20
-8
-10
23
16
-47
.55
.09
.26
.30
.59
.80
.39
.93
157.1
101.0
12.7
118.8
118.2
136.8
33.0
168.8
14.6
12.2
1.4
13.1
10.6
16.9
3.4
20.8
0.16
0.24
0.26
-0.10
-0.06
0.46
0.09
-0.18
ALL VEHICLES 73 11.1 14. U n no * m aft n m K n.11
5.82
16.31
19-22
-5.11
-2.12
22$
5.15
-12.11
5.81
EMISSION RESULTS ARE : HC PPM HEXANE , CO MOLE % ,NOX PPM , 02 %
3-212
-------
TABLE 21 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON PHASE 1
5unn«n PASSED VEHICLES BEFORE MAINTENANCE
MODE : 30 MPH
DENVER
1975 & 1976 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 112 VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
NO. OF CYL.
2
4
6
8
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 - 250
251 - 350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799
2800 - 3799
3800 - 4799
4800 - 5799
ALL VEHICLES
EMISSION RESULTS
2
5
20
27
19
2
17
11
43
19
11
19
24
17 .
19
27
10
73
ARE :
HC
MEAN S.D.
55.0
109.0
66.6
77.2
102.9
5.0
117.1
61.8
77.9
105.3
61.8
103.7
57.4
107.6
85.3
78.6
45.5
82.6
HC PPM
21.2
78.9
54.1
60.5
66.9
7.1
58.4
57.4
59.7
65.4
57.4
68.5
43.1
68.6
66.0
58.8
27.7
61.8
HEXANE
CO
MEAN S.D.
0.04
1.12
1.86
1.19
1.83
0.05
2.11
0.88
1.48
1.90
0.88
1.67
1.34
1.82
1.25
1.61
1.14
1.50
0.01
1.05
1.49
1.39
1.79
0.00
1.82
1.18
1.42
1.83
1.18
1.71
1.17
1.87
1.58
1.41
1.05
1.52
, CO MOLE %
NOX
MEAN S.
1417
731
258
613
525
96
597
751
455
545
751
505
415
561
641
492
314
523
,NOX
.6
.0
.2
.9
.0
.9
.8
.5
.4
.0
.5
.8
.4
.9
.8
.9
.8
.3
1338
193
198
471
319
23
306
450
462
329
450
444
482
315
411
557
175
437
PPM ,
D.
.7
.7
.4
.7
.4
.7
.5
.9
.6
.4
.9
.3
.2
.1
.8
.6
.3
.1
02
02
MEAN S.D.
3-35
1.98
2.39
1.37
3.09
1.70
3-32
2.34
1.74
3.15
2.34
1.29
2.09
3.10
2.71
1.51
1.53
2.19
,
0.78
1.61
1.98
1.64
1.65
0.00
1.80
1.42
1.81
1.77
1.42
1.61
1.92
1.64
1.72
1.81
1.63
1.83
3-213
-------
TABLE 21 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON PHASE 1
PASSED VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE
MODE : 30 MPH
DENVER
1975 & 1976 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 112 VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
NO. OF CYL.
2
4
6
8
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 - 250
251 - 350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799
2800 - 3799
3800 - 4799
4800 - 5799
2
5
20
27
19
2
17
11
43
19
11
19
24
17
'19
27
10
HC
MEAN S.D.
60
71
60
69
86
15
96
58
67
87
58
82
55
93
62
68
58
.0
.0
.8
.4
.1
.0
.2
.9
.2
.6
.9
.4
.1
.2
.5
.3
.5
0.0
58.6
51.0
49.7
69.0
7.1
66.9
50.5
49.7
68.1
50.5
56.1
41.2
69.5
52.7
46.7
52.3
CO
MEAN S.D.
0.02
1.19
1.88
1.16
1.14
0.05
1.38
0.80
1.49
1.24
0.80
1.29
1.65
1.12
0.97
1.43
2.05
0.02
1.50
2.01
1.31
0.77
0.00
0.82
1.15
1.70
0.88
1.15
1.4'6
1.88
0.79
1.31
1.34
2.49
NOX
MEAN S.
1340.7
483-7
241.3
593-3
453.1
98.4
520.1
601.9
439-3
475.8
601.9
479.2
407.8
494.0
507.9
498.7
304.0
1201
295
188
423
291
14
293
401
438
307
401
442
442
280
361
530
200
D.
.1
.2
.4
.3
.0
.4
.8
.8
.6
.3
.8
.6
.4
.0
.6
.7
.2
02
MEAN S.D.
3.00
1.66
2.14
1.14
3-03
3-50
2.99
1.75
1.59
3.05
1.75
1.10
1.98
3-25
2.00
1.34
1.64
0.28
1.51
1.«
1.13
1.6i
O.tt
1.85
1.05
1.52
1.75
1.05
1.12
1.51
1.62
1.«
1.18
1.15
ALL VEHICLES 73 71.2 55.3 1.32 1.45 473-3 401.8 2.00
EMISSION RESULTS ARE : HC PPM HEXANE , CO MOLE % ,NOX PPM , 02 %
1.65
3-214
-------
TABLE 21 CONT'D
OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST PROCEDURE EXHAUST EMISSION REDUCTIONS
ON PHASE 1 PASSED VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE
MODE : 30 MPH
DENVER
1975 & 1976 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 112 VEHICLES
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
NO. OF CYL.
2
4
6
8
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 - 250
251 - 350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799
2800 - 3799
38oo , 4799
WOO - 5799
NO. OF
VEH
2
5
20
27
19
2
17
11
43
19
11
19
24
17
19
27
10
IMPR
-5.0
38.0
5.9
7.8
16.8
-10.0
20.9
3-0
10.7
17.6
3.0
21.3
2.3
14.4
22.8
10.4
-13.0
HC
JIMPR
-9.1
34.9
8.8
10.1
16.4
-200.0
17.8
4.8
13.7
16.7
4.8
20.6
4.0
13.4
26.7
13.2
-28.6
IMPR
0.02
-0.07
-0.03
0.03
0.69
0.00
0.73
0.08
-0.01
0.65
0.08
0.38
-0.31
0.70
0.28
0.18
-0.91
CO
*B
50.
-6.
-1.
2.
37.
0.
34.
8.
-0.
34.
8.
22.
-23.
38.
22.
11.
-79.
1PR
,00
,25
58
44
72
00
60
65
46
50
65
53
21
47
13
27
13
IMPR
76.9
247.4
17.0
20.6
71.9
-1.5
77.6
149.5
16.0
69.3
149.5
26.6
7.6
68.0
133.9
-5.8
10.8
NOX
flM
5.
33-
6.
3.
13.
-1.
13.
19.
3.
12.
19.
5.
1.
12.
20.
-1.
3-
>R
,4
,8
6
4
7
5
0
9
5
7
9
3
8
1
9
2
4
IMPR
0.35
0.32
0.25
0.23
0.06
-1.80
0.32
0.59
0.14
0.10
0.59
0.19
0.10
-0.15
0.71
0.17
-0.11
02
%IMPE
10.45
16.16
10.54
16.49
1.87
-105.88
9.75
25.10
8.30
3.18
25.10
15.04
4.99
-4.74
26.17
11.52
-7.19
VEHICLES 73
RESULTS ARE
11.3 13-7 0.18 11.84 50.0 9.6 0.20 9.08
HC PPM HEXANE , CO MOLE % ,NOX PPM , 02 %
3-215
-------
TABLE 21 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON PHASE 1
PASSED VEHICLES BEFORE MAINTENANCE
MODE : IDLE (D)
DENVER
1975 & 1976 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 112 VEHICLES
NC
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
NO. OF CYL.
2
4
6
8
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 - 250
251 - 350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799
2800 - 3799
3800 - 4799
4800 - 5799
ALL VEHICLES
). OF
VEH
2
4
17
27
6
0
6
7
43
6
7
19
24
4
15
27
10
56
MEAN
52.
152.
137.
83.
145.
•
152.
118.
102.
152.
118.
100.
104.
183.
122.
94.
105.
110.
E
5
5
6
0
8
5
6
9
5
6
8
6
7
7
3
0
2
1C
S.D.
24.7
105.3
98.6
76.3
85.3
78.5
109.1
86.7
78.5
109.1
90.5
85.5
79.4
103.3
77.1
92.7
88.6
C
MEAN
0.04
0.67
2.86
0.58
3.08
2.94
0.89
1.44
2.94
0.89
1.07
1.73
3.40
1.27
1.38
1.57
1.53
0
S.D.
0.01
0.78
2.57
1.17
0.55
0.87
1.52
2.12
0.87
1.52
1.73
2.37
0.14
1.89
1.87
2.67
2.00
N
MEAN
134.1
74.6
75.2
188.7
44.3
49.4
283.8
114.5
49.4
283.8
147.4
88.4
45.6
190.5
119.2
94.6
128.7
OX
S.
96
26
30
146
19
20
206
87
20
206
115
42
24
179
92
39
119
D.
.1
.5
.4
.9
.5
.6
.0
.0
.6
.0
.2
.8
.4
.4
.9
.3
.8
(
MEAN
3.75
2.90
3.14
2.19
4.00
5.08
2.64
2.48
5.08
2.64
1.82
3-00
4.22
3.46
2.24
2.63
2.78
D2
S.D.
1.20
U8
2.88
2.2?
2M
2.51
2.52
2.31
2.51
2.52
1.76
2.63
2.65
2.52
2.26
2.76
2.47
EMISSION RESULTS ARE : HC PPM HEXANE , CO MOLE % ,NOX PPM , 02 %
3-216
-------
TABLE 21 CONT'D
OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON PHASE 1
PASSED VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE
MODE : IDLE (D)
DENVER
1975 & 1976 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 112 VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
VEHICLE
MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL
IMPORTS
NO. OF
2
1|
6
8
MOTORS
CYL.
2
11
17
27
6
0
6
7
43
HC
MEAN S.
70
61
78
54
340
343
80
60
.0 14
.2 73
.8 34
.1 51
.0 523
.3 521
.0 92
.6 37
D.
.1
.5
.9
.3
.6
.3
.6
.1
CO
MEAN S.D.
0.02
0.36
1.33
0.18
2.23
2.23
0.48
0.60
0.02
0.63
1.14
0.44
2.96
2.96
0.81
0.95
NOX
MEAN S.D.
84.2
92.8
101.2
194.3
57.8
65.7
153.0
148.5
8.5
40.4
52.6
145.3
54.0
53-8
124.2
122.3
02
MEAN S.D.
3.40
4.15
4.08
2.36
4.35
5.20
2.46
3.12
1.84
3.92
1.77
2.14
2.97
2.75
2.01
2.27
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 -
251 -
250
350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA
1800 -
2800 -
3800 -
1800 -
WEIGHT
2799
3799
4799
5799
6
7
19
24
4
15
27
10
343
80
52
67
150
166
57
57
.3 521
.0 92
.1 36
• 3 37
.0 64
.7 347
.6 35
.0 32
.3
.6
.3
.1
.8
.9
.6
.7
2.23
0.48
0.30
0.83
1.17
1.07
0.49
0.85
2.96
0.81
0.63
1.09
1.49
2.03
0.91
1.05
65.7
153-0
207.6
101.8
74.5
153-9
158.7
96.1
53.8
124.2
161.1
43.1
60.5
162.1
112.7
41.6
5.20
2.46
2.41
3.69
4.62
3.95
2.49
3.76
2.75
2.01
2.53
1.91
3.34
2.74
2.01
1.80
VEHICLES 56 93.3 ^5.4 0.76 1.35 140.2 118.6 3.26 2.36
-#
RESULTS ARE : HC PPM HEXANE , CO MOLE % ,NOX PPM , 02 %
3-217
-------
TABLE 21 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST PROCEDURE EXHAUST EMISSION REDUCTIONS
ON PHASE 1 PASSED VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE
MODE : IDLE (D)
DENVER
1975 & 1976 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 112 VEHICLES
N(
VEHICLE MPG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
NO. OF CYL.
2
4
6
8
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 - 250
251 - 350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799
2800 - 3799
3800 - 4799
4800 - 5799
ALL VEHICLES
). OF
VEH
2
4
17
27
6
0
6
7
43
6
7
19
24
4
15
27
10
56
m
-17
91
58
28
-194
-190
38
42
-190
38
48
37
33
-44
36
48
16
PR
.5
.2
.8
.9
.2
.8
.6
.3
.8
.6
.7
.3
.7
.0
.7
.0
.9
HC
%m
-33
59
42
34
-133
-125
32
41
-125
32
48
35
18
-35
38
45
15
PR
.3
.8
.7
.8
.1
.1
.5
.1
.1
.5
.3
.7
.4
.9
.9
.7
.3
C
IMPR
0.02
0.31
1.53
0.40
0.85
0.71
0.40
0.84
0.71
"0.40
0.77
0.90
2.23
0.20
0.89
0.73
0.77
:o
JIMPR
56.25
46.84
53.54
68.42
27.57
24.08
45.65
58.48
24.08
45.65
71.84
51.97
65.44
15.58
64.59
46.12
50.46
N(
IMPR
49.9
-18.2
-26.0
-5.6
-13.6
-16.3
130.9
-34.1
-16.3
130.9
-60.2
-13.4
-28.9
36.6
-39.5
-1.5
-11.6
)X
*IMPR
37.2
-24.4
-34.6
-3.0
-30.7
-32.9
46.1
-29.8
-32.9
46.1
-40.8
-15.2
-63.4
19.2
-33.1
-1.6
-9.0
IMPR
0.35
-1.25
-0.94
-0.18
-0.35
-0.12
0.19
-0.65
-0.12
0.19
-0.59
-0.69
-0.40
-0.49
-0.26
-1.13
-0.49
02
am
9.33
-13.10
-29.96
-8.11
-8.75
-2.30
7.03
-26.10
-2.30
7.03
-32.16
-23-06
-9.17
-1U.26
.11.12
-H2.97
-17.15
EMISSION RESULTS ARE : HC PPM HEXANE , CO MOLE % ,NOX PPM , 02 %
3-218
-------
TABLE 21 CONT'D
OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON PHASE 1
PASSED VEHICLES BEFORE MAINTENANCE
MODE : IDLE (N)
DENVER
1975 & 1976 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 112 VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
NO. OF CYL.
2
*
6
8
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 - 250
251 - 350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799
2800 - 3799
3800 - 4799
4800 - 5799
ALL VEHICLES
EMISSION RESULTS
2
5
20
27
19
2
17
11
43
19
11
19
24
17
19
27
10
73
ARE
HC
MEAN S.
44
90
74
82
188
5
209
83
78
187
83
87
70
205
81
79
65
107
.0 8
.0 78
.6 52
.5 68
.4 446
.0 7
.1 468
.1 71
.1 60
.6 446
.1 71
.9 75
.3 45
.9 470
.8 72
.0 59
.0 45
.4 234
D.
.5
.5
.5
.9
.3
.1
.8
.5
.1
.6
.5
.1
.1
.1
.1
.8
.7
.5
: HC PPM HEXANE
CO
MEAN S.D.
0.04
1.32
1.11
0.59
1.83
0.06
1.88
0.97
0.85
1.69
0.97
0.94
0.78
1.94
0.88
0.86
0.67
1.09
0.01
1.72
1.24
1.15
2.56
0.06
2.69
1.34
1.23
2.60
1.34
1.44
1.06
2.69
1.35
1.25
0.94
1.72
, CO MOLE %
NOX
MEAN S.D.
56
50
42
65
44
26
45
67
52
43
67
58
48
46
58
52
55
52
,NOX
.6
.7
.9
.5
.9
.6
.6
.7
.9
.6
-7
.7
.3
.3
.1
.0
.2
.7
PPM
12.0
15.0
11.2
33.0
14.6
3.5
11.9
32.4
24.7
12.7
32.4
32.1
15.9
14.9
27.6
29-0
16.9
24.5
, 02
02
MEAN S.D.
5.10
2.46
5.00
2.60
4.48
4.00
5.18
3.98
3.21
5.05
3-98
2.21
4.01
4.56
4.68
2.89
3.36
3.81
%
1.27
1.76
3.10
2.90
2.19
2.26
2.34
3-17
2.88
2.30
3.17
2.33
3.07
2.15
3.09
2.79
3-22
2.86
3-219
-------
TABLE 21 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON PHASE 1
PASSED VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE
MODE : IDLE (N)
DENVER
1975 & 1976 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 112 VEHICLES
NC
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
NO. OF CYL.
2
4
6
8
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 - 250
251 - 350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799
2800 - 3799
3800 - 4799
4800 - 5799
). OF
VEH
2
5
20
27
19
2
17
11
43
19
11
19
24
17
19
27
10
MEA
72
69
50
67
132
130
132
61
61
131
61
61
61
130
73
52
79
t
N
.5
.0
.1
.4
.4
.0
.1
.5
.5
.8
.5
.6
.5
.6
.8
.4
.0
1C
S.D
17.
58.
30.
68.
131.
169.
132.
57.
54.
131.
57.
43.
63.
132.
69.
36.
90.
.
7
4
4
7
0
7
7
4
6
3
4
5
0
0
8
3
1
C
MEAN
0.02
0.97
0.80
0.26
1.25
0.27
1.30
0.60
0.52
1.20
0.60
0.36
0.64
0.95
0.88
0.46
0.62
0
S.D.
0.02
1.46
1.03
0.55
1.72
0.32
1.81
1.01
0.86
1.74
1.01
0.69
0.97
0.95
1.79
0.93
0.71
NC
MEAN
50.6
53-5
49-5
57.9
48.6
27.6
48.9
50.5
55.9
46.6
50.5
62.4
50.7
51.0
46.7
59.2
48.9
)X
S.D.
3.5
19.2
12.2
24.0
18.7
0.7
15.4
21.7
19.7
16.0
21.7
25.2
12.3
18.0
17.3
21.8
14.5
(
MEAN
4.45
2.54
5.73
2.70
4.33
5.10
4.71
3-98
3.66
4.75
3-98
2.56
4.53
4.47
4.68
3.06
4.38
32
S.D,
1.20
Ul
2.2!
2.6!
2.61
3.82
2.63
3.10
2.56
2.6!
3.W
2.12
2.*
2.70
3-01
2.59
1.95
ALL VEHICLES
73
79.8
>.5
0.'
1.19 52.7 19.3
2.72
EMISSION RESULTS ARE : HC PPM HEXANE , CO MOLE % ,NOX PPM , 02 %
3-220
-------
TABLE 21 CONT'D
ciiMMARY OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST PROCEDURE EXHAUST EMISSION REDUCTIONS
SUMMAiu QN pHASE 1 pASSED VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE
MODE : IDLE (N)
DENVER
1975 & 1976 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 112 VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
VEHICLE
MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL
IMPORTS
NO. OF
2
4
6
8
MOTORS
CYL.
2
5
20
27
19
2
17
11
43
IMPR
-28.5
21.0
24.5
15.1
56.1
-125.0
77.1
21.6
16.6
HC
5&IMPR
-64.8
23.3
32.9
18.3
29.7
-2500.0
36.8
26.0
21.2
IMPR
0.02
0.35
0.31
0.33
0.58
-0.21
0.58
0.37
0.33
CO
5&IMPR
56
26
27
55
31
-358
30
38
39
.25
.44
.89
.94
.78
.33
.78
.50
.21
NOX
IMPR 5HMPR
6.0
-2.8
-6.5
7.7
-3-7
-1.0
-3.3
17.3
-3-0
10.6
-5.5
-15.2
11.7
-8.2
-3.8
-7.2
25.5
-5.6
IMPR
0.65
-0.08
-0.73
-0.10
0.15
-1.10
0.47
0.00
-0.45
02
5&IMPR
12.75
-3.25
-14.60
-3-70
3.40
-27.50
9.09
0.00
-13.89
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 -
251 -
250
350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA
1800 -
2800 -
3800 -
4800 -
WEIGHT
2799
3799
4799
5799
19
11
19
24
17
19
27
10
55.8
21.6
26.3
8.9
75.3
8.0
26.6
-14.0
29.7
26.0
29.9
12.6
36.6
9.8
33.7
-21.5
0.50
0.37
0.58
0.14
0.99
-0.00
0.39
0.05
29
38
61
17
51
-0
45
7
• 33
.50
.55
.85
.26
.36
.76
.46
-3-1
17-3
-3.8
-2.3
-4.7
11.4
-7-2
6.3
-7.0
25.5
-6.5
-4.8
-10.2
19.6
-13.9
11.4
0.31
0.00
-0.36
-0.52
0.09
0.01
-0.18
-1.02
6.04
0.00
-16.23
-12.88
1.94
0.11
-6.16
-30.36
VEHICLES 73
RESULTS ARE
27.5 25.7 0.38 35.12
0.1
0.1 -0.18 -4.82
HC PPM HEXANE , CO MOLE % ,NOX PPM , 02 %
3-221
-------
TABLE 21 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON ALL PHASE 1
VEHICLES BEFORE MAINTENANCE
MODE : 50 MPH
DENVER
*
1975 & 1976 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 112 VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
VEHICLE
MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL
IMPORTS
NO. OF
2
4
6
8
MOTORS
CYL.
6
15
25
40
26
2
27
17
66
HC
MEAN S.D.
70.8
93.3
62.2
95.0
107.3
5.0
104.5
80.7
87.4
35.8
49.5
52.3
62.7
65.6
7.1
58.1
56.2
60.4
CO
MEAN S.D.
0.77
2.29
1.71
2.39
2.17
0.12
2.16
1.88
2.17
0.64
1.77
1.71
2.07
1.90
0.11
1.61
1.79
2.02
NOX
MEAN S.D.
1923
1024
779
775
1213
368
1271
1072
843
.9
.9
.3
.3
.8
.6
.4
.9
.4
850.6
501.3
383.5
392.2
745.1
86.9
691.4
729.4
474.8
02
MEAN S.D.
1.42
1.40
2.23
0.82
2.60
2.20
2.41
1.26
1.44
0.88
1.73
1.71
1.09
1.53
0.57
1.71
0.58
1.61
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 -
251
250
350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA
1800 -
2800 -
3800 -
4800 -
WEIGHT
2799
3799
4799
5799
29
15
29
39
27
26
43
16
97.6
83.2
92.4
82.4
106.5
72.6
92.1
78.0
61.6
58.3
50.7
66.2
64.2
40.6
59.6
74.0
2.02
1.97
2.03
2.23
2.08
1.53
2.37
2.25
1.64
1.89
1.66
2.23
1.86
1.44
1.81
2.59
1209
985
928
826
1239
955
926
674
.1
.3
.0
.0
.9
.4
.9
.6
705.9
679.1
562.0
465.7
720.0
630.3
519.7
347.4
2.40
1.32
1.04
1.70
2.36
1.69
1.34
1.27
1.65
1.03
1.22
1.76
1.60
1.^1
1.55
1.62
ALL VEHICLES 112 89.0 59.8 2.09 1.88 973.0 600.4 1.66
EMISSION RESULTS ARE : HC PPM HEXANE , CO MOLE % ,NOX PPM . 02 %
1.55
3-222
-------
TABLE 21 CONT'D
CUMM4RY OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON ALL PHASE 1
SUMP1H VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE
MODE : 50 MPH
DENVER
1975 & 1976 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 112 VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
NO. OF CYL.
2
4
6
8
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 - 250
251 - 350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799
2800 - 3799
3800 - 4799
^800 - 5799
ALL VEHICLES 1
EMISSION RESULTS
6
15
25
40
26
2
27
17
66
29
15
29
39
27
26
43
16
12
ARE
HC
MEAN S.D.
53
78
45
88
93
25
93
61
75
88
63
79
69
93
57
76
78
76
: HC
.2
.0
.2
.0
.2
.0
.3
.1
.0
.6
.7
.6
.9
.0
.0
.9
.7
.4
PPM
21.0
44.7
41.9
65.1
63.8
21.2
62.8
40.3
60.0
63.1
42.3
50.6
65.5
62.9
36.3
53.9
83.7
58.5
HEXANE
CO
MEAN S.D.
1.19
2.19
1.22
2.46
2.08
0.16
2.31
1.55
2.03
2.16
1 .60
1.74
2.20
2.14
1.33
2.06
2.63
1.99
1.10
1.82
1.12
2.03
1.98
0.12
1.89
1.41
1.89
1.90
1.49
1.41
2.15
1.99
1.32
1.53
2.68
1.83
*
. CO MOLE %
NOX
MEAN S.
1402.9
820.8
635.6
785.1
1101.9
289.4
1115.9
817.3
789.0
1058.9
732.1
901.3
739.7
1130.2
711.5
878.9
616.7
863.2
729
410
319
385
743
169
737
418
431
742
355
449
428
725
378
484
290
535
.NOX PPM .
D.
.1
.4
.3
.8
.3
.9
.5
.7
.8
.6
.4
.9
.9
.7
.3
.0
.0
.9
02
02
MEAN S.D.
1.67
1.05
2.20
0.62
2.58
2.75
2.22
1.22
1.30
2.26
1.29
0.86
1.61
2.39
1.42
1.18
1.25
1.54
%
1.18
1.42
1.35
0.86
1.35
0.92
1.58
1.09
1.38
1.54
1.15
1.11
1.46
1.50
1.24
1.38
1.30
1.44
3-223
-------
TABI.K 21 CONT'D
SUMMARY OK KKDKRAL THHEE MODE TEST PROCEDURE EXHAUST EMISSION REDUCTIONS
ON ALL PHASE 1 VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE
MODE : 50 MPH
DENVER
1975 & 1976 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 112 VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
VEHICLE
MFG.
AMER. MDTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL
IMPORTS
NO. OF
2
4
6
8
MOTORS
CYL.
6
15
25
40
26
2
27
17
66
HC
IMPR JIMPR
17.7
15.3
17.0
7.0
14.2
-20.0
11.2
19.6
12.3
24.9
16.4
27.3
7.4
13.2
-400.0
10.7
24.3
14.1
IMPR
-0.42
0.10
0.49
-0.07
0.10
-0.04
-0.15
0.34
0.14
CO
W
-54
4
28
-2
4
-32
-6
17
6
NOX
MPR IMPR &IMPR
.20
.45
.48
.99
.44
.00
.82
.86
.42
521.0
204.1
143.7
-9.8
111.8
79.2
155.5
255.6
54.5
27.1
19.9
18.4
-1.3
9.2
21.5
12.2
23.8
6.5
IMPR
-0.25
0.35
0.04
0.20
0.02
-0.55
0.19
0.04
0.13
02
— - — .
-17,6
s,a
1.70
24J
0.85
-25.00
7.83
3.0]
9.18
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 -
251 -
250
350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA
1800 -
2800 -
3800 -
4800 -
ALL VEH:
WEIGHT
2799
3799
4799
5799
ECLES
29
15
29
39
27
26
43
16
112
9.0
19.5
12.8
12.4
13.5
15.6
15.2
-0.8
19.fi
9.3
23.4
13.8
15.1
12.7
21.5
16.5
-1.0
in 1
-0.14
0.37
0.29
0.03
-0.06
0.20
0.31
-0.38
n m
-6
18
14
1
-3
12
13
-16
n
.93
.80
.17
.17
.10
.92
.26
.85
AH
150.2
253.2
26.8
86.3
109.8
244.0
48.0
57.9
mo O
12.4
25.7
2.9
10.5
8.9
25.5
5.2
8.6
113
0.14
0.04
0.18
0.09
-0.03
0.27
0.15
0.02
n 12
5.»
2.71
17.55
5.25
-1.10
16.00
1.9*
7-19
EMISSION RESULTS ARE : HC PPM HEXANE . CO MOLE % .NOX PPM . 02 %
3-224
-------
TABLE 21 CONT'D
eriMMARY OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON ALL PHASE 1
bUMI™ VEHICLES BEFORE MAINTENANCE
MODE : 30 MPH
DENVER
1975 & 1976 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 112 VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
NO. OF CYL.
2
4
6
8
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 - 250
251 - 350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799
2800 - 3799
3800 - 4799
"800 . 5799
ALL VEHICLES 1
ASSIGN RESULTS
6
15
25
40
26
2
27
17
66
29
15
29
39
27
26
43
16
12
ARE
HC
MEAN S.D.
99
127
75
96
122
5
126
100
95
118
100
102
90
127
97
95
83
102
: HC
.2
.3
.9
.0
.5
.0
.7
.6
.3
.3
.7
.2
.3
.6
.3
.8
.4
.0
PPM
47.8
67.6
58.4
71.3
75.5
7.1
56.7
86.3
67.5
63.1
91.0
61.5
70.9
74.5
66.2
62.4
79.1
69.6
HEXANE
CO
MEAN S.D.
0.36
1.67
2.08
1.86
2.07
0.05
2.03
1.33
1.97
1.90
1.42
1.67
2.11
2.10
1.13
2.02
2.13
1.85
0.30
1.16
1.99
2.09
2.11
0.00
1.56
2.19
2.00
1.58
2.32
1.70
2.18
2.09
1.41
1.77
2.59
1.93
. CO MOLE %
NOX
MEAN S.
1356.9
939.8
269.5
519.4
585.8
96.9
640.4
841.9
502.8
602.9
821.1
547.8
494.8
609.6
722.1
570.6
325.8
580.2
800
416
204
433
376
23
352
558
484
367
569
491
495
368
508
563
213
480
,NOX PPM .
D.
.5
.4
.6
.2
.9
.7
.7
.5
.8
.6
.4
.3
.8
.4
.7
.9
.5
.5
02
02
MEAN S.D.
1.80
1.41
2.29
0.99
2.91
1.70
2.75
1.82
1.45
2.68
1.96
1.00
1.75
2.63
2.20
1.30
1.28
1.83
%
1.28
1.69
1.89
1.45
1.77
0.00
2.00
1.35
1.74
1.94
1.38
1.38
1.88
1.85
1.71
1.67
1.72
1.81
3-225
-------
TABLE 21 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON ALL PHASE 1
VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE
MODE : 30 MPH
DENVER
1975 & 1976 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 112 VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
NO. OF CYL.
2
4
6
8
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 - 250
251 - 350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799
2800 - 3799
3800 - 4799
4800 - 5799
ALL VEHICLES
6
15
25
40
26
2
27
17
66
29
15
29
39
27
26
43
16
112
HC
MEAN S.D.
70
93
70
87
98
15
106
69
84
99
70
84
83
104
70
81
93
86
.8
.0
.8
.6
.6
.0
.1
.4
.6
.8
.7
.2
.5
.5
.1
.9
.1
.2
22.9
63.6
59.7
64.6
71.0
7.1
66.5
51.2
63.6
68.3
54.4
53.3
69.7
68.2
52.0
54.7
87.3
63.4
CO
MEAN S.D.
0.83
1.44
2.14
1.70
1.38
0.05
1.59
0.94
1.89
1.48
0.99
1.43
2.16
1.42
1.03
1.80
2.56
1.64
0.90
1.17
2.23
1.72
1.41
0.00
1.36
1.04
1.91
1.37
1.10
1.51
2.10
1.38
1.19
1.64
2.52
1.70
NOX
MEAN S.D.
829.1
682.5
237.6
515.9
506.3
98.4
565.9
557.0
454.6
533.7
547.3
463.4
457.1
554.7
494.6
524.6
285.0
490.6
674
372
191
398
334
14
346
339
418
354
358
374
444
335
324
490
169
390
.3
.7
.0
.0
.2
.4
.0
.1
.1
.6
.1
.8
.8
.7
.5
.5
.4
.6
02
MEAN S.D,
1.92
0.91
2.08
0.81
2.95
3.50
2.54
1.60
1.27
2.61
1.70
0.90
1.52
2.78
1.77
1.05
1.25
1.66
u
1.21
U3
i,a
i,«i
0,11
1.95
1.13
1,«
1.33
1.11
1.21
1.50
1.81
1.35
1,«
1.W
EMISSION RESULTS ARE : HC PPM HEXANE . CO MOLE % .NOX PPM . 02 %
3-226
-------
TABLE 21 CONT'D
OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST PROCEDURE EXHAUST EMISSION REDUCTIONS
ur
MODE : 30 MPH
DENVER
1975 & 1976 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 112 VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
VEHICLE MPG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
NO. OF CYL.
2
1
6
8
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 - 250
251 - 350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799
2800 - 3799
3800 - 4799
1800 - 5799
ALL VEHICLES 1
ASSIGN RESULTS
6
15
25
40
26
2
27
17
66
29
15
29
39
27
26
43
16
12
ARE :
HC
IMPR JlMPR
28.3
34.3
5.1
8.4
23.9
-10.0
20.6
31.2
10.7
18.4
30.0
18.0
6.8
23.1
27.2
13.9
-9.7
15.8
HC PPM
28.6
27.0
6.7
8.8
19.5
-200.0
16.2
31.0
11.2
15.6
29.8
17.6
7.5
18.1
28.0
14.5
-11.6
15.5
HEXANE .
IMPR
-0.47
0.23
-0.05
0.16
0.69
0.00
0.44
0.39
0.08
0.41
0.43
0.25
-0.05
0.68
0.10
0.22
-0.43
0.21
CO
5HMPR
-132
13
-2
8
33
0
21
29
3
21
30
14
-2
32
9
10
-20
11
CO MOLE %
.94
.93
.52
.78
.18
.00
.83
.62
.86
.79
.37
.77
.36
.31
.13
.95
.09
.42
.NOX
NOX
IMPR JIMPR
527
257
31
3
79
-1
74
284
48
69
273
84
37
54
227
46
40
89
PPM
.7
.4
.8
.6
.5
.5
.5
.9
.2
.2
.8
.4
.7
.9
.6
.0
.8
.6
. 02
38.9
27.4
11.8
0.7
13.6
-1.5
11.6
33.8
9.6
11.5
33.3
15.4
7.6
9.0
31.5
8.1
12.5
15.4
%
IMPR
-0.12
0.51
0.21
0.17
-0.04
-1.80
0.21
0.22
0.19
0.07
0.26
0.10
0.24
-0.15
0.43
0.25
0.03
0.16
02
56IMPR
-6.48
35.85
9.34
17.47
-1.25
-105.88
7.67
12.26
12.84
2.70
13.27
10.31
13.47
-5.56
19.35
18.96
2.44
8.90
3-227
-------
TABLE 21 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON ALL PHASE 1
VEHICLES BEFORE MAINTENANCE '
MODE : IDLE (D)
DENVER
1975 & 1976 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 112 VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
NO. OF CYL.
2
4
6
8
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 - 250
251 - 350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799
2800 - 3799
3800 - 4799
4800 - 5799
ALL VEHICLES
5
14
22
38
8
0
9
12
66
9
10
29
39
7
21
43
16
fl7
MEAN
137
241
196
156
160
193
184
176
193
188
165
184
208
192
160
200
no
.0
.1
.6
.2
.3
.3
.4
.5
.3
.7
.5
.0
.9
.4
.2
.6
o
HC
S.D.
93
111
202
164
85
106
147
169
106
161
154
177
84
160
164
179
l£ft
.0
.4
.7
.5
.2
.9
.5
.6
.9
.1
.4
.9
.9
.3
.1
.4
4
CO
MEAN S.D.
1.40
3.68
3.70
1.99
3.79
4.21
2.00
2.79
4.21
1.95
2.17
3.22
5.05
2.34
2.56
3.20
f\ Qo
1.47
2.61
3.14
2.89
1.90
2.57
2.45
2.95
2.57
2.65
2.65
3.05
2.82
2.93
2.55
3.39
••> Or»
NOX
MEAN S.D.
225.1
63.8
66.5
151.9
57.0
47.6
246.7
95.8
47.6
230.0
142.3
73.3
55.9
172.3
104.9
74.6
444 C.
148.6
24.7
33.9
143.6
29.1
30.7
189.1
82.6
30.7
193.5
126.0
41.7
33.9
178.2
87.6
44.2
4 4 O ft
02
MEAN s,0,
1.90
1.79
2.72
1.65
3.15
3.54
1.92
1.93
3.54
2.17
1.32
2.32
2.67
2.66
1.76
2.01
o 10
US
1.85
2.61
2.08
2.15
3.05
2,05
2,11
3.05
2.21
1.51
2.«
2.72
2,5«
2.00
2.55
2.28
EMISSION RESULTS ARE : HC PPM HEXANE . CO MOLE % .NOX PPM . 02 %
3-228
-------
TABLE 21 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON ALL PHASE 1
SUMMAn VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE
MODE : IDLE (D)
DENVER
1975 & 1976 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 112 VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
NO. OF CYL.
2
4
6
8
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 - 250
251 - 350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799
2800 - 3799
3800 - 4799
^800 - 5799
ALL VEHICLES
EMISSION RESULTS
5
14
22
38
8
0
9
12
66
9
10
29
39
7
21
43
16
87
ARE
HC
MEAN S.D.
118
95
90
81
275
271
107
82
271
108
70
92
128
167
79
85
105
: HC
.0
.0
.0
.3
.9
.1
•3.
.9
.1
.7
.7
.8
.2
.1
.4
.9
.7
PPM
75.6
75.9
60.8
73.3
458.1
426.5
88.7
66.0
426.5
98.0
51.0
73.0
55.6
292.4
63.2
77.5
156.5
HEXANE
CO
MEAN S.D.
0.93
1.00
1.72
0.55
1.85
1.91
0.78
1.00
1.91
0.84
0.50
1.34
1.10
1.18
1.02
0.98
1.06
1.57
1.14
2.06
0.96
2.63
2.40
1.13
1.54
2.40
1.24
0.91
1.78
1.16
1.84
1.75
1.09
1.61
. CO MOLE %
NOX
MEAN S.
166.8
75.3
95.0
173.4
67.5
74.5
162.5
128.6
74.5
140.3
193.4
87.9
79.3
151.8
135.8
95.4
127.7
101
33
49
133
50
46
108
109
46
104
142
40
45
141
106
44
105
.NOX PPM .
D.
.3
.6
.4
.6
.2
.5
.7
.2
.5
.5
.9
.4
.9
.4
.1
.4
.8
02
02
MEAN S.D.
2.04
1.99
3.92
1.94
4.04
3.67
2.22
2.59
3.67
2.40
2.16
2.85
3.59
3.27
2.05
3.02
2.65
%
1.60
2.82
1.75
2.01
2.83
3.17
1.91
2.25
3.17
2.06
2.30
2.15
3.11
2.74
1.87
2.21
2.31
3-229
-------
TABLE 21 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST PROCEDURE EXHAUST EMISSION REDUCTIONS
ON ALL PHASE 1 VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE
MODE : IDLE (D)
DENVER
1975 & 1976 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 112 VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
VEHICLE
MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL
IMPORTS
NO. OF
2
4
6
8
MOTORS
CYL.
5
14
22
38
8
0
9
12
66
HC
TlufD'D ^TIuTOD
Xrirn >>AWrn
19
146
106
74
-115
-77
77
93
.0
.1
.6
.9
.6
.8
.1
.6
13.9
60.6
54.2
47.9
-72.1
-40.2
41.8
53.0
CO
IMPR *IMPR
0.47
2.68
1.98
1.43
1.94
2.30
1.22
1.79
33.60
72.79
53.59
72.19
51.22
54.69
61.06
64.26
NOX
IMPR *IMPR
58.3
-11.5
-28.5
-21.5
-10.5
-26.9
84.2
-32.8
25.9
-18.1
-42.8
-14.2
-18.4
-56.6
34.1
-3^.3
IMPR
-0.14
-0.20
-1.20
-0.29
-0.89
-0.12
-0.31
-0.66
02
JlMPfi
-7.37
-11.16
-11.31
-17.70
-28.1?
-3.15
-16.09
-31.07
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 -
251 -
250
350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA
1800 -
2800 -
3800 -
4800 -
WEIGHT
2799
3799
4799
5799
9
10
29
39
7
21
43
16
-77
80
94
91
80
25
80
114
.8
.0
.8
.2
.7
.2
.8
.7
-40.2
42.4
57.3
49.5
38.6
13.1
50.4
57.2
2.30
1.11
1.67
1.88
3.95
1.16
1.53
2.22
54.69
56.91
77.15
58.34
78.20
49.51
59.97
69.44
-26.9
89.7
-51.1
-14.6
-23.4
20.4
-30.9
-20.8
-56.6
39.0
-35.9
-20.0
-42.0
11.8
-29.5
-27.9
-0.12
-0.23
-0.83
-0.53
-0.91
-0.61
-0.30
-1.01
-3.15
-10.60
-62.76
-22.92
-31.22
-23.12
-16.80
-50.31
ALL VEHICLES
87
73.6 41.1 1.76 62.47 -16.1 -14.4 -0.55
EMISSION RESULTS ARE : HC PPM HEXANE . CO MOLE % .NOX PPM . 02 %
3-230
-------
TABLE 21 CONT'D
OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON ALL PHASE 1
v VEHICLES BEFORE MAINTENANCE
MODE : IDLE (N)
DENVER
1975 & 1976 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 112 VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
NO. OF CYL.
2
4
6
8
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 - 250
251 - 350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799
2800 - 3799
3800 - 4799
4800 . 5799
ALL VEHICLES 1
ASSIGN RESULTS
6
15
25
40
26
2
27
17
66
29
15
29
39
27
26
43
16
12
ARE
MEAN
120.5
222.7
117.1
176.0
208.4
5.0
230.0
136.6
165.3
214.5
139.5
168.6
160.2
227.3
136.5
153.4
197.8
173.7
HC
S.
73
141
147
192
405
7
394
130
178
384
139
156
191
395
130
152
251
243
D.
.1
.5
.1
.9
.6
.1
.1
.4
.6
.1
.0
.1
.6
.2
.7
.6
.3
.0
: HC PPM HEXANE
CO
MEAN S.D.
1.86
4.29
1.97
2.24
2.37
0.06
2.89
2.34
2.39
2.69
2.35
2.05
2.64
3.04
2.05
2.27
2.68
2.46
1.70
2.94
2.50
2.90
2.68
0.06
2.95
2.89
2.71
2.94
3.07
2.26
2.94
3.10
2.67
2.50
3.14
2.77
. CO MOLE %
NOX
MEAN S.D.
85
45
40
53
50
26
46
72
46
45
66
55
43
49
56
50
43
50
.NOX
.7
.9
.3
.1
.3
.6
.7
.6
.9
.3
.8
.9
.7
.1
.6
.0
.2
.4
PPM
27.5
14.5
13.7
33.7
18.4
3.5
19.0
33.0
23.9
19.1
30.6
34.2
17.2
19.3
31.3
27.4
21.5
25.9
. 02
02
MEAN S.D.
2.23
1.69
4.33
1.86
4.01
4.00
4.00
2.95
2.42
4.00
3.22
1.58
2.96
3.63
3.63
2.17
2.51
2.91
%
2.30
1.79
3.16
2.60
2.60
2.26
2.98
2.91
2.70
2.90
3.00
2.07
2.94
2.72
3.18
2.49
3.01
2.84
3-231
-------
TABLE 21 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF FEDEHAL THRE^MODEJEST PROCEDORE^ESOLTS OH ALL PHASE ,
MODE : IDLE (N)
DENVER
1975 & 1976 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 112 VEHICLES
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
NO. OF CYL.
2
4
6
8
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 - 250
251 - 350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799
2800 - 3799
3800 - 4799
4800 - 5799
NO. OF
VEH
6
15
25
40
26
2
27
17
66
29
15
29
39
27
26
43
16
MEAN
105.8
78.7
63.3
92.9
193.5
130.0
191.1
76.6
82.1
186.9
76.1
72.6
89.1
190.0
83.5
72.4
107.8
HC
S.D.
54.6
56.9
70.8
94.4
278.3
169.7
271.7
60.7
85.1
264.2
64.9
44.2
104.0
271.8
67.8
65.2
131.7
CO
MEAN
1
1
1
0
1
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
1
1
1
0
0
.34
.09
.11
.72
.57
.27
.68
.89
.92
.58
.95
.57
.16
.44
.06
.94
.92
S.D.
1.69
1.33
1.98
1.08
2.15
0.32
2.09
1.28
1.53
2.05
1.35
0.98
1.78
1.77
1.72
1.76
1.03
NOX
MEAN
81
42
49
54
54
27
53
59
52
51
49
63
47
53
52
56
46
.4
.8
.0
.4
.2
.6
.5
.3
.0
.7
.7
.7
.4
.3
.0
.1
.1
S.D.
39.6
18.6
11.7
24.0
26.4
0.7
27.1
33.7
19.0
27.0
21.2
29.8
13.0
26.8
26.1
22.6
17.0
MEAN
2.63
1.41
5.52
2.08
4.31
5.10
3.85
3.46
2.99
3.94
3.74
2.30
3.41
3.95
3.99
2.51
3.24
02
S.D.
1.80
1.58
2.26
2,1(1
2.92
3,82
3,05
3.1?
2.58
3.08
3,2?
2.35
2,«
3.12
3-10
2.15
2.3*
ALL VEHICLES 112 108.4 156.7 1.09 1.66 53.0 23.8 3.31
EMISSION RESULTS ARE : HC PPM HEXANE . CO MOLE % .NOX PPM . 02 %
2,81
3-232
-------
TABLE 21 CONT'D
OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST PROCEDURE EXHAUST EMISSION REDUCTIONS
w
MODE : IDLE (N)
DENVER
1975 & 1976 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 112 VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
VEHICLE
MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL
IMPORTS
NO. OF
2
4
6
8
MOTORS
CYL.
6
15
25
40
26
2
27
17
66
IMPR
14.7
144.0
53.8
83.2
14.9
-125.0
38.9
60.0
83.2
HC
12.2
64.7
46.0
47.2
7.2
-2500.0
16.9
43.9
50.3
IMPR
0.52
3.20
0.86
1.51
0.80
-0.21
1.21
1.45
1.47
CO
%I
27
74
43
67
33
-358
41
61
61
NOX
MPR IMPR *IMPR
.86
.67
.52
.68
.75
.33
.95
.77
.45
4.3
3.1
-8.7
-1.3
-4.0
-1.0
-6.8
13.3
-5.1
5.0
6.7
-21.5
-2.4
-7.9
-3.8
-14.6
18.3
-11.0
IMPR
-0.40
0.28
• -1.19
-0.22
-0.30
-1.10
0.15
-0.51
-0.57
02
-17.91
16.60
-27.42
-11.53
-7.58
-27.50
3.70
-17.37
-23.48
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 -
251 -
250
350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA
1800 -
2800 -
3800 -
11800 -
WEIGHT
2799
3799
4799
5799
29
15
29
39
27
26
43
16
27.6
63.3
96.0
71.1
37.3
53.0
81.0
90.0
12.9
45.4
57.0
44.4
16.4
38.8
52.8
45.5
1.11
1.41
1.48
1.48
1.59
0.99
1.33
1.76
41
59
72
56
52
48
58
65
.33
.82
.08
.00
.47
.20
.47
.55
-6.4
17.1
-7.8
-3.6
-4.2
4.6
-6.1
-2.9
-14.2
25.6
-14.0
-8.3
-8.5
8.2
-12.1
-6.7
0.06
-0.52
-0.72
-0.45
-0.33
-0.36
-0.34
-0.73
1.55
-16.15
-45.53
-15.14
-8.99
-9.85
-15.63
-29.18
L VEHICLES 112 65.2 37.6 1.37 55.80 -2.7 -5.3 -0.40 -13.63
RESULTS ARE : HC PPM HEXANE . CO MOLE % .NOX PPM . 02 %
3-233
-------
TABLE 21 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF FEDERAL THH^MODE^EST^ROCEDUR^RESULTS ON ALL FAILED
MODE : 50 MPH
DENVER
1975 & 1976 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 332 VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
NO. OF CYL.
2
4
6
8
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 - 250
251 - 350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799
2800 - 3799
3800 - 4799
4800 - 5799
ALL VEHTr.r.KS
9
29
16
56
14,
0
24
18
82
24
14
45
41
20
28
60
16
1311
HC
MEAN S.D.
68.9
110.7
78.7
119.9
138.9
115.0
83.3
115.7
115.0
90.4
84.4
144.5
134.2
77.3
90.8
215.6
1 m n
27
127
60
189
50
86
61
169
86
67
68
226
87
54
64
351
1 h it
.7
.1
.3
.5
.5
.6
.3
.1
.6
.1
.5
.2
.7
.2
.8
.5
tr
CO
MEAN S.D.
1.33
2.51
1.74
2.61
3.10
2.44
1.75
2.59
2.44
1.87
2.20
2.89
2.76
1.54
2.61
2.94
0 ll ll
0.80
1.54
1.92
2.39
2.12
1.99
1.46
2.19
1.99
1.61
2.17
2.10
1.97
1.42
2.11
2.63
*\ f\rv
NOX
MEAN S.D.
1425
920
923
761
1414
1207
1078
833
1207
978
951
761
1218
1020
917
548
f\ li *
.6
.0
.9
.9
.3
.9
.7
.5
.9
.7
.7
.9
.7
.3
.2
.9
c.
757.0
719.7
544.6
382.6
876.1
750.1
733.7
539.0
750.1
735.2
673.6
375.7
763.5
697.9
563.3
312.4
zto a
02
MEAN S.D.
1.20
0.57
1.95
0.36
1.80
1.37
0.78
0.69
1.37
0.81
0.39
1.02
1.14
1.05
0.64
0.82
n All
1.1?
1.13
1.6!
0,11
1.65
1.68
0.91
1.01
1.68
1.06
0.32
1.11
1.10
1.11
0.91
1.31
1.21
EMISSION RESULTS ARE : HC PPM HEXANE , CO MOLE % ,NOX PPM , 02 %
3-234
-------
TABLE 21 CONT'D
OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON ALL FAILED
VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE
MODE : 50 MPH
DENVER
1975 & 1976 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 332 VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
NO. OF CYL.
2
4
6
8
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 - 250
251 - 350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799
2800 - 3799
3800 - 4799
1800 - 5799
AL^ VEHICLES 1
EMISSION RESULTS
9
29
16
56
14
0
24
18
82
24
14
45
41
20
28
60
16
24
ARE
HC
MEAN S.D.
52
72
58
80
123
92
57
79
92
60
71
84
80
72
79
84
78
: HC
.7
.8
.3
.1
.4
.2
.0
.1
.2
.2
.6
.1
.3
.5
.0
.5
.4
PPM
22.0
43-7
56.6
70.2
119.4
102.3
35.1
63.8
102.3
39.0
63.4
62.1
55.8
91.2
60.5
82.7
70.1
HEXANE
CO
MEAN S.D.
1.84
2.51
1.26
2.67
2.32
2.14
1.92
2.51
2.14
1.93
2.09
2.91
2.18
1.72
2.52
3.03
2.35
1.00
1.88
1.43
2.36
2.13
1.96
1.79
2.17
1.96
1.94
2.05
2.17
1.86
1.79
2.06
2.64
2.07
, CO MOLE %
NOX
MEAN S.D.
1002
711
728
691
1249
1051
736
720
1051
627
836
631
1104
765
761
521
786
,NOX
.1
.1
.1
.9
.2
.5
.0
.0
.5
.9
.1
.1
.6
.1
.0
.9
.5
383.4
409.2
508.8
451.9
837.7
718.2
440.4
457.9
718.2
381.8
515.9
375.2
758.5
482.3
468.6
241.1
527.6
02
MEAN S.D.
1.18
0.40
2.15
0.26
1.91
1.37
0.84
0.61
1.37
0.93
0.31
0.93
1.17
1.11
0.54
0.67
0.79
1.18
0.61
1.43
0.28
1.52
1.61
0.99
0.92
1.61
1.11
0.35
1.17
1.31
1.48
0.85
0.84
1.12
PPM , 02 %
3-235
-------
TABLE 21 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST PROCEDURE EXHAUST EMISSION REDUCTIONS
ON ALL FAILED VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE
MODE : 50 MPH
DENVER
1975 & 1976 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 332 VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
NO. OF CYL.
2
4
6
8
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 - 250
251 - 350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799
2800 - 3799
3800 - 4799
4800 - 5799
ALL VEHICLES
9
29
16
56
14
0
24
18
82
24
14
45
41
20
28
60
16
124
EMISSION RESULTS ARE
HC
IMPR JIMPR
16.2
37.9
20.5
39.8
15.5
22.7
26.3
36.6
22.7
30.2
12.8
60.4
53.9
4.9
11.8
131.1
32.4
: HC PPM
23.5
34.3
26.0
33.2
11.2
19.8
31.6
31.6
19.8
33.4
15.1
41.8
40.2
6.3
13.0
60.8
29.2
HEXANE
CO
IMPR *IMPR
-0.51
0.00
0.48
-0.06
0.79
0.30
-0.17
0.08
0.30
-0.06
0.12
-0.01
0.58
-0.18
0.10
-0.09
0.09
-38
0
27
-2
25
12
-9
3
12
-3
5
-0
20
-11
3
-2
3
, CO MOLE %
.45
.18
.61
.18
.32
.19
.50
.25
.19
.43
.37
.44
.90
.56
.74
.94
.65
,NOX
NOX
IMPR fclMPR
423.5
208.9
195.9
69.9
165.1
156.4
342.7
113.5
156.4
350.7
115.6
130.8
114.1
255.2
156.2
27.0
155.1
PPM ,
29
22
21
9
11
12
31
13
12
35
12
17
9
25
17
4
16
02 %
.7
.7
.2
.2
.7
.9
.8
.6
.9
.8
.2
.2
.4
.0
.0
.9
• -2
IMPR
0.02
0.17
-0.20
0.10
-0.11
-0.00
-0.06
0.09
-0.00
-0.11
0.08
0.10
-0.02
-0.06
0.09
0.15
0.05
02
1.85
29.88
-10.13
27.86
-5.95
-0.00
-7.8
12.10
-o.oo
-1iO»
20.51
9.12
4$
J>*
14.66
18.63
5-7<
3-236
-------
TABLE 21 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON ALL FAILED
bUMI™ VEHICLES BEFORE MAINTENANCE
MODE : 30 MPH
DENVER
1975 & 1976 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 332 VEHICLES
NO
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
NO. OF CYL.
2
4
6
8
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 - 250
251 - 350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799
2800 - 3799
3800 - 4799
4800 - 5799
ALL VEHICLES
EMISSION RESULTS
. OF
VEH
9
29
16
56
14
0
24
18
82
24
14
45
41
20
28
60
16
124
ARE
HC
MEAN S.D.
113.9
138.4
88.7
140.5
175.4
156.9
140.6
127.9
156.9
152.1
107.0
148.2
172.2
127.1
113.8
184.4
135.4
: HC PPM
36.7
71.4
59.5
130.0
57.0
79.9
75.6
110.1
79.9
81.0
81.2
128.6
90.1
62.7
78.7
186.4
100.5
HEXANE
CO
MEAN S.D.
1.00
2.19
2.34
2.68
2.87
2.60
2.08
2.44
2.60
2.23
2.05
2.79
2.92
1.92
2.42
2.68
2.42
1.06
1.46
2.40
2.18
2.22
1.74
2.32
2.06
1.74
2.55
1.91
2.12
2.25
1.72
1.93
2.55
2.03
, CO MOLE %
NOX
MEAN S.
1046
898
310
439
762
664
891
532
664
943
545
536
655
773
570
417
610
,NOX
.5
.0
.3
.0
.6
.9
.7
.7
.9
.9
.0
.4
.5
.7
.6
.3
.4
712
482
247
353
554
466
689
427
466
740
468
389
506
601
466
245
492
PPM ,
D.
.2
.1
.9
.7
.2
.6
.1
.7
.6
.8
.0
.2
.6
.7
.6
.9
.9
02
02
MEAN S.D.
1.31
0.55
2.08
0.32
2.05
1.54
0.97
0.65
1.54
1.10
0.32
1.00
1.29
1.23
0.57
0.84
0.87
%
1.71
1.10
1.82
0.50
2.05
2.04
1.35
1.10
2.04
1.51
0.34
1.45
1.73
1.81
0.95
1.38
1.40
3-237
-------
TABLE 21 CONT'D
i
i
SUMMARY OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON ALL FAILED
VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE
MODE : 30 MPH
DENVER
1975 & 1976 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 332 VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
NO. OF CYL.
2
4
6
8
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 - 250
251 - 350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799
2800 - 3799
3800 - 4799
4800 - 5799
ALL VEHICLRS
9
29
16
56
14
0
24
18
82
24
14
45
41
20
28
60
16
1911
HC
MEAN S.D.
100
103
92
95
115
103
114
95
103
124
82
107
104
105
94
102
oo
.6
.1
.7
.6
.5
.3
.0
.3
.3
.5
.6
.5
.6
.7
.4
.0
a
51.3
53.1
66.7
76.1
55.5
64.3
52.0
68.8
64.3
51.6
69.1
64.4
70. 0
53.5
65.9
82.0
He n
CO
MEAN S.D.
1.56
1.76
2.58
2.02
1.95
1.60
1.72
2.16
1.60
1.62
1.75
2.60
1.56
1.71
2.18
2.26
i r\e\
1.33
0.97
2.50
1.91
1.84
1.60
1.18
1.91
1.60
1.01
1.84
1.89
1.65
1.36
1.93
1.95
i TIT
NOX
MEAN S.D.
746.3
655.0
237.3
448.1
633.9
631.2
589.3
460.0
631.2
625.3
469.0
450.4
646.8
541.8
495.9
351.1
IT 4 t f\
513
361
198
396
418
358
426
404
358
470
434
357
382
377
455
153
ii/\i
.8
.8
.3
.1
.7
.5
.9
.9
.5
.0
.6
.4
.5
.2
.0
.5
o
02
MEAN S.D.
1.42
0.36
1.82
0.27
2.25
1.61
1.09
0.49
1.61
1.26
0.31
0.70
1.48
1.28
0.37
0.71
n fin
Ul
0.62
1.72
0.3?
1.9*
1.96
1,«
0.85
1.96
1.60
0.18
1.06
1,71
1.80
0.9^
1.3"
EMISSION RESULTS ARE : HC PPM HEXANE , CO MOLE % ,NOX PPM , 02 %
3-238
-------
TABLE 21 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST PROCEDURE EXHAUST EMISSION REDUCTIONS
SU i ON ALL FAILED VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE
MODE : 30 MPH
DENVER
1975 & 1976 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 332 VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
WB^M^^r^«
VEHICLE
MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL
IMPORTS
NO. OF
2
4
6
8
MOTORS
CYL.
9
29
16
56
14
0
24
18
82
HC
IMPR 5HMPR
13
35
-3
45
59
53
26
32
.3
.3
.9
.0
.8
.5
.5
.6
11.7
25.5
-4.4
32.0
34.1
34.1
18.9
25.5
IMPR
-0.55
0.43
-0.24
0.67
0.92
1.01
0.36
0.28
CO
JIMPR
-55.20
19.72
-10.29
24.80
32.13
38.66
17.26
11.58
NOX
IMPR %JMPE
300.3
243.0
73.1
-9.1
128.7
33.6
302.4
72.7
28.7
27. 1
23.5
-2.1
16.9
5.1
33.9
13.6
IMPR
-0.11
0.19
0.27
0.05
-0.20
-0.07
-0.12
0.16
02
%IMPE
-8.47
35.00
12.89
16.20
-9.93
-4.88
-12.93
24.32
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 -
251 -
250
350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA
1800 -
2800 -
3800 -
1800 -
WEIGHT
2799
3799
4799
5799
^ VEHICLES
SMISSIOK
-f
1 RESULTS
24
14
45
41
20
28
60
16
124
ARE
53
27
24
40
67
21
19
82
35
: HC J
.5
.7
.4
.7
.6
.4
.5
.3
.8
PPM :
34.1
18.2
22.8
27.4
39.3
16.9
17.1
44.7
26.4
HEXANE .
1.01
0.61
0.30
0.19
1.36
0.20
0.23
0.43
0.43
CO MOU
38.66
27.35
14.59
6.70
46.55
10.65
9.67
15.96
17.93
E % .NOX
33.6
318.6
75.9
86.0
8.8
231.9
74.8
66.1
98.5
PPM . O;
5.1
33.7
13.9
16.0
1.3
30.0
13.1
15.8
16.1
2 %
-0.07
-0.16
0.02
0.30
-0.19
-0.05
0.20
0.13
0.07
-4.88
-14.61
5.48
29.87
-14.92
-4.07
35.48
15.61
8.31
3-239
-------
TABLE 21 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON ALL FAILED
UPHTn.RS REFfiRR MAINTENANCE «AWiU
VEHICLES BEFORE MAINTENANCE
MODE : IDLE (D)
DENVER
1975 & 1976 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 332 VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
VEHICLE
MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL
IMPORTS
NO. OF
2
4
6
8
MOTORS
CYL.
6
28
14
52
2
0
7.
13
82
HC
MEAN S.D.
174.2
392.0
347.5
297.8
203.7
356.4
261.0
327.9
52
377
281
146
97
139
135
270
.3
.1
.0
.7
.2
.7
.8
.4
CO
MEAN S.D.
3.02
5.96
6.04
5.76
5.92
8.07
5.05
5.60
1.77
2.40
3.18
2.73
3.M3
2.42
3.15
2.59
NOX
MEAN S.D.
205.3
48.9
64.0
56.4
95.4
24.7
122.5
59.2
148.0
22.8
69.6
59.0
11.6
35.2
126.2
54.4
02
MEAN S.D.
0.63
0.90
1.75
0.42
0.60
0.40
0.76
0.78
....
0.14
1,16
2.21
0.53
0.28
0.19
0.44
1.28
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 -
251
250
350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA
1800 -
2800 -
3800 -
4800 -
AI r VFLJ-
WEIGHT
2799
3799
4799
5799
rnr PO
7
9
45
41
6
20
60
16
< AO
356.4
306.4
263.8
381.8
349.6
283.7
307.6
409.4
••%«"»* «•*
139
139
132
352
155
129
224
428
A ^ A
.7
.3
.9
.2
.3
.5
.1
.2
8.07
5.76
5.30
5.'71
8.47
5.89
5.44
5.37
2.42
3.38
2.46
2.75
2.52
2.80
2.65
2.48
24.7
68.2
82.0
52.3
38.6
82.4
66.0
48.7
* i~ ._.
35.2
54.4
90.0
44.0
44.5
108.3
63.7
24.5
rm *\ 4
0.40
0.84
0.43
1.14
0.43
0.74
0.74
0.90
n 7R
0.19
0.51
0.51
1.66
0.26
0.56
1.34
1.25
1,16
321.3 250.2 5.70 2.71 64.9 70.1
EMISSION RESULTS ARE : HC PPM HEXANE , CO MOLE % ,NOX PPM , 02 %
3-240
-------
TABLE 21 CONT'D
OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON ALL FAILED
VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE
MODE : IDLE (D)
DENVER
1975 & 1976 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 332 VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
VEHICLE
MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL
IMPORTS
HO. OF
2
1
6
8
MOTORS
CYL.
6
28
14
52
2
0
7
13
82
MEAN
133.3
105.9
110.5
101.3
83.7
167.1
148.3
93.3
HC
S.D.
59.9
60.5
80.1
96.0
8.8
112.5
58.5
78.4
CO
MEAN S.D.
1.24
1.37
2.17
1.00
0.70
1.81
1.74
1.15
1.31
1.14
2.65
1.37
0.92
1.40
1.43
1.60
NOX
MEAN S.
223.6
76.2
117.0
141.1
96.6
84.1
160.0
121.6
D.
72.2
36
89
121
27
36
82
107
.5
.7
.6
.7
.9
.8
.9
02
MEAN S.D.
1.00
0.92
2.66
1.11
3.10
0.53
1.24
1.38
0.46
1.22
1.90
1.20
3.11
0.28
1.31
1.51
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 -
251 -
250
350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA
1800 -
2800 -
3800 -
1800 -
WEIGHT
2799
3799
7
9
45
41
6
20
60
16
167.1
168.6
80.1
108.7
117.9
154.5
94.0
82.0
112.5
59.7
74.8
76.6
69.4
81.4
78.0
83.0
1.81
2113
0.68
1.64
1.39
1.74
1.26
0.65
1.40
1.53
0.98
1.91
1.38
1.39
1.75
0.87
84.1
117.2
162.6
89.8
87.4
146.8
125.9
101.6
36
48
124
74
36
78
117
80
.9
.0
.7
.9
.1
.1
.5
.9
0.53
1.34
1.21
1.53
1.28
1.39
1.10
1.94
0.28
1.55
1.29
1.67
1.99
1.59
1.24
1.70
VEHICLES 102
^SSION RESULTS ARE
105.4 81.9
1.57 123.9 102.5 1.30 1.44
HC PPM HEXANE , CO MOLE % ,NOX PPM , 02
3-241
-------
TABLE 21 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST PROCEDURE EXHAUST EMISSION REDUCTIONS
ON ALL FAILED VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE ^
MODE : IDLE (D)
DENVER
1975 & 1976 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 332 VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
VEHICLE
MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL
IMPORTS
NO. OF
2
4
6
8
MOTORS
CYL.
6
28
14
52
2
0
7
13
82
HC
IMPR jtlMPft
40
286
237
196
120
189
112
234
.8
.1
.0
.4
.0
.3
.7
.6
23.4
73.0
68.2
66.0
58.9
53.1
43.2
71.5
CO
IMPR £EMPR
1.77
4.59
3.87
4.76
5.22
6.26
3.31
4.45
58.73
77.00
64.13
82.71
88.14
77.56
65.54
79.49
NOX
IMPR $IMPR
-18.2
-27.2
-53.0
-84.7
-1.2
-59.4
-37.5
-62.4
-8.9
-55.7
-82.8
-150.2
-1.3
-240.8
-30.6
-105.4
IMPR
-0.37
-0.02
-0.91
-0.69
-2.50
-0.13
-0.48
-0.60
02
JUHPB
*-
-57.89
-1.98
-51.93
-161.68
-416.6?
-32.11
-62.63
-77.13
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 -
251 -
250
350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA
1800 -
2800 -
3800 -
4800 -
WEIGHT
2799
3799
4799
5799
ALL VEHICLES
7
9
45
41
6
20
60
16
102
189
137
183
273
231
129
213
327
216
.3
.8
.7
.1
.7
.2
.6
.3
.0
53.1
45.0
69.6
71.5
66.3
45.6
69.4
80.0
67.2
6.26
3.63
4.62
4.08
7.09
4.16
4.18
4.71
4.43
77.56
62.96
87.23
71.37
83.61
70.51
76.76
87.84
77.73
-59.4
-49.0
-80.6
-37.5
-48.7
-64.4
-59.9
-52.9
-5Q.O
-240.8
-71.9
-98.3
-71.6
-126.2
-78.1
-90.8
-108.5
-90.9
-0.13
-0.50
-0.78
-0.39
-0.85
-0.65
-0.36
-1.01
-0.55
-32.11
-59-21
-181.87
-33-83
.196.15
,88.51
J18.10
.115.22
-73.N
EMISSION RESULTS ARE : HC PPM HEXANE , CO MOLE % ,NQX PPM , 02 %
3-242
-------
TABLE 21 CONT'D
OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON ALL FAILED
w VEHICLES BEFORE MAINTENANCE
MODE : IDLE (N)
DENVER
1975 & 1976 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 332 VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
NO. OF CYL.
2
4
6
8
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 - 250
251 - 350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799
2800 - 3?99
3800 - 4799
1800 . 5?99
ALL VEHICLES 1
ASSIGN RESULTS
9
29
16
56
14
0
24
18
82
24
14
45
41
20
28
60
16
24
ARE
MEAN
151.7
407.1
253.4
377.0
241.2
321.5
212.6
367.9
321.5
234.1
307.7
411.6
346.6
223.4
350.1
470.0
336.4
HC
S.
65
416
319
242
223
265
143
328
265
156
203
415
277
133
298
461
300
D.
.7
.0
.0
.5
.9
.7
.8
.4
.7
.9
.3
.0
.8
.2
.9
.8
.0
: HC PPM HEXANE
CO
MEAN S.D.
3.59
5.99
3.99
5.76
4.57
5.73
4.93
5.24
5.73
5.34
4.93
5.41
6.18
4.94
5.03
5.78
5.29
2.33
2.57
3.48
2.62
2.76
3.15
3.11
2.66
3.15
3.29
2.45
2.88
3.06
3.01
2.74
2.36
2.82
, CO MOLE %
NOX
MEAN S.D.
78
40
39
28
59
40
62
34
40
52
39
35
44
47
36
31
39
,NOX
.5
.7
.8
.0
.7
.7
.6
.5
.7
.2
.0
.8
.9
.5
.7
.2
.7
PPM
29.0
17.1
22.3
14.2
27.3
30.1
30.3
16.4
30.1
23.1
24.6
17.8
32.2
26.9
20.3
12.5
23.9
, 02
02
MEAN S.D.
1.09
0.82
3.25
0.41
1.96
1.65
1.40
0.87
1.65
1.62
0.41
1.35
1.32
1.57
0.85
0.89
1.10
%
1.02
1.12
3.28
0.58
2.61
2.58
1.93
1.56
2.58
2.14
0.49
2.04
2.21
2.22
1.62
1.47
1.86
3-243
-------
TABLE 21 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF FEDERAL
PBOCEDURE^ESULTS ON ALL PAIUO
MODE : IDLE (N)
DENVER
1975 & 1976 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 332 VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
NO. OF CYL.
2
4
6
8
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 - 250
251 - 350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799
2800 - 3799
3800 - 4799
4800 - 5799
ALL VEHICLES
9
29
16
56
14
0
24
18
82
24
14
45
41
20
28
60
16
124
HC
MEAN S.D.
108.9
87.9
78.3
106.0
235.0
204.0
100.6
89.1
204.0
103.9
74.4
105.2
230.7
95.4
84.4
103.6
113.0
45
56
85
115
354
287
59
87
287
67
68
99
308
57
77
127
151
.3
.2
.3
.8
.7
.9
.3
.6
.9
.2
.5
.3
.8
.7
.4
.4
.8
CO
MEAN S.D.
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
1
2
1
1
0
1
.46
.31
.34
.08
.91
.91
.40
.08
.91
.49
.71
.49
.04
.34
.16
.74
.29
1.35
1.31
2.28
1.47
2.26
1.91
1.44
1.58
1.91
1.56
1.12
1.85
2.03
1.33
1.73
0.98
1.65
NOX
MEAN S.D.
93.4
46.9
45.9
54.5
78.2
59.7
73.3
52.8
59.7
57.6
65.7
46.0
59.3
66.1
55.0
46.5
57.1
36/4
20.5
19.6
30.3
42.3
41.7
37.4
26.1
41.7
23.8
35.3
19.1
42.1
34.1
28.7
22.1
31.9
02
MEAN S.D.
2.19
0.77
4.17
1.12
3.18
2.06
2.29
1.52
2.06
2.63
1.27
1.76
2.21
2.26
1.30
1.86
1.7»
2.115
0.83
2.79
1.21
3.38
2.86
2.81
1.76
2.86
3-15
1.12
1.99
3.1"
2.72
1.59
1.18
2.19
EMISSION RESULTS ARE : HC PPM HEXANE , CO MOLE % ,NOX PPM , 02 1>
3-244
-------
TABLE 21 CONT'D
o,,uvi4RY OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST PROCEDURE EXHAUST EMISSION REDUCTIONS
SUMMAKi ur
AFTER MAINTENANCE
MODE : IDLE (N)
DENVER
1975 & 1976 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 332 VEHICLES
N(
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MDTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
NO. OF CYL.
2
4
6
8
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 - 250
251 - 350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799
2800 - 3?99
3800 - 47QQ
oo , 5799
D. OF
VEH
9
29
16
56
14
0
24
18
82
24
14
45
41
20
28
60
16
IM
42
319
175
270
6
117
112
278
117
130
233
306
115
128
265
366
H
PR
.8
.1
.2
.9
.3
.5
.1
.8
.5
.2
.3
.4
.9
.0
.6
.4
IC
*IMPR
28.2
78.4
69.1
71.9
2.6
36.6
52.7
75.8
36.6
55.6
75.8
74.4
33.4
57.3
75.9
78.0
(
IMPR
2.13
4.68
2.65
4.68
2.66
3.82
3.53
4.16
3.82
3.85
4.22
3.92
4.15
3.60
3.87
5.03
:o
56IMPR
59.41
78.17
66.34
81.29
58.23
66.66
71.67
79.40
66.66
72.17
85.63
72.52
67.09
72.88
76.98
87.16
IM
-14
-6
-6
-26
-18
-19
-10
-18
-19
-5
-26
-10
-14
-18
-18
-15
N(
PR
.9
.2
.1
.5
.5
.0
.7
.3
.0
.4
.7
.2
.5
.5
.3
.3
DX
JIMPR
-19.0
-15.2
-15.4
-94.4
-31.0
-46.8
-17.2
-53.1
-46.8
-10.4
-68.4
-28.5
-32.3
-39.0
-49.9
-49.0
IMPR
-1.10
0.05
-0.92
-0.70
-1.22
-0.41
-0.89
-0.66
-0.41
-1.01
-0.86
-0.41
-0.90
-0.68
-0.45
-0.97
02
tf TTufDD
it j^n^ n
-101.02
6.33
-28.39
-170.56
-62.41
-24.75
-63.89
-75.55
-24.75
-62.11
-212.57
-30.44
-67.80
-43.31
-52.93
-109.12
VEHICLES 124
ASSIGN RESULTS ARE
223.4 66.4 4.01 % 75.68 -17.4 -43.7 -0.64 -58.59
HC PPM HEXANE , CO MOLE % ,NOX PPM , 02 %
3-2A5
-------
TABLE 21 CONT'D
i ;
SUMMARY OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON PHASE 1
PASSED VEHICLES BEFORE MAINTENANCE '
MODE : 50 MPH
DENVER
1974 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 30 VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
NO. OF CYL.
2
4
6
8
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 - 250
251 - 350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799
2800 - 3799
3800 - 4799
4800 - 5799
AT r inruTr-i PO
1
2
5
11
3
1
3
1
17
4
1
12
5
4
3
12
3
oo
HC
MEAN S.D.
245
247
172
161
180
330
123
160
179
175
160
203
122
175
208
182
135
<• r»O
.0
.5
.0
.4
.0
.0
• 3
.0
.7
.0
.0
.7
.0
.0
• 3
.1
.0
f\
0.0
38.9
37.0
83.1
130.3
0.0
33.3
0.0
76.1
106.8
0.0
77.6
26.6
106.8
43.7
84.9
27.8
fm fm **
CO
MEAN S.D.
1.50
4.35
2.44
2.56
2.18
3.80
1.62
2.30
2.72
2.16
2.30
3.27
1.39
2.16
2.63
3.00
1.53
A. r *•.
0.00
4.17
0.98
2.48
1.41
0.00
0.44
0.00
2.37
1.15
0.00
2.59
0.90
1.15
1.33
2.69
0.85
NOX
MEAN S .
2986.4
977.0
1443-0
1000.4
2092.7
604.1
2364.2
1070.1
1215.9
1924.2
1070.1
1121.3
1443.0
1924.2
1708.9
1043.6
1363.7
0
976
607
540
1297
0
832
0
762
1112
0
874
362
1112
1106
678
571
rt *^ /•
D.
.0
.3
.1
.0
.8
.0
.5
.0
.4
.0
.0
.2
.9
.0
.3
.8
.3
f\
02
MEAN S.D.
1.00
0.65
0.64
2.60
2.23
5.10
0.77
4.40
1.71
1.85
4.40
1.82
1.44
1.85
2.00
1.82
1.87
1 «5
•**•
0.00
0.35
0.18
1.1?
2.18
0.00
0.12
0.00
1.39
2.1?
o.oo
1.11
1.1?
2.1?
2.09
1.11
nf
1.86
1.5?
2.60 2.12 1338.1 836.9
EMISSION RESULTS ARE : HC PPM HEXANE , CO MOLE % ,NOX PPM , 02 %
3-246
-------
TABLE 21 CONT'D
OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON PHASE 1
PASSED VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE
MODE : 50 MPH
DENVER
1974 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 30 VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
NO. OF CYL.
2
4
6
8
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 - 250
251 - 350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799
2800 - 3?99
3800 - i|799
4800 . 5?99
ALL VEHICLES
EM*SSION RESULTS
1
2
5
11
3
1
3
1
17
4
1
12
5
4
3
12
3
22
ARE
HC
MEAN S.D.
230
190
180
147
104
12
151
110
169
116
110
185
129
116
198
162
145
156
: HC
.0
.0
.8
• 7
.0
.0
.7
.0
.1
-7
.0
.4
.8
-7
-3
.8
.0
.9
PPM
0.0
56.6
50.4
63-9
80.3
0.0
10.4
0.0
61.7
70.3
0.0
65.3
27.1
70.3
77.5
64.4
30.4
64.3
HEXANE
CO
MEAN S.D.
1.40
2.45
2.50
2.62
0.87
0.90
1.33
2.10
2.54
1.22
2.10
2.87
1.76
1.22
2.47
2.81
1.42
2.28
•x
0.00
1.34
1.23
2.62
0.06
0.00
0.84
0.00
2.20
0.72
0.00
2.49
1.16
0.72
1.29
2.52
0.43
2.01
, CO MOLE %
NOX
MEAN S.
2364.2
1017-0
1268.3
998.6
2187-0
389.1
2588.2
1020.3
1124.2
2038.4
1020.3
1086.9
1213-5
2038.4
1592.7
912.3
1468.3
1285.7
0
251
580
622
1585
0
912
0
656
1328
0
720
533
1328
693
619
293
844
,NOX PPM ,
D.
.0
.0
.7
.8
.4
.0
.4
.0
.6
.1
.0
.1
.1
.1
.7
.5
.4
• 3
02
02
MEAN S.D.
0.80
0.60
0.68
2.40
1.50
1.40
1.37
3-70
1.59
1.37
3-70
1.83
1.02
1.37
1.67
1.82
1.33
1.65
%
0.00
0.28
0.33
1-71
0.36
0.00
0.47
0.00
1.56
0.39
0.00
1.74
0.87
0.39
1.77
1.76
1.01
1.44
3-247
-------
TABLE 21 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST PRXEDURE EXHAUST EMISSION REDUCTIONS
ON PHASE 1 PASSED VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE Wi
MODE : 50 MPH
DENVER
1974 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 30 VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL
IMPORTS
NO. OF
2
4
6
8
MOTORS
CYL.
1
2
5
11
3
1
3
1
17
HC
IMPR JIMPR
15.0
57.5
-8.8
13-6
76.0
318.0
-28.3
50.0
10.6
6.1
23.2
-5-1
8.5
42.2
96.4
-23.0
31-3
5.9
CO
IMPR JIMPR
0.10
1.90
-0.06
-0.06
1.32
2.90
0.28
0.20
0.18
6.67
43.68
-2.46
-2.20
60.31
76.32
17.53
8.70
6.45
NOX
IMPR %JMPE
622
-40
174
1
-94
215
-224
49
91
.2
.0
.7
.8
.2
.0
.0
.8
.8
20.8
-4.1
12.1
0.2
-4.5
35.6
-9.5
4.7
7.5
IMPR
0.20
0.05
-0.04
0.20
0.73
3-70
-0.60
0.70
0.11
02
20.00
7.69
-6.25
7.69
32.M
72.55
-78.26
15-91
6.55
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 -
251 -
250
350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA
1800 -
2800 -
3800 -
4800 -
WEIGHT
2799
3799
4799
5799
4
1
12
5
4
3
12
3
58.2
50.0
18.3
-7.8
58.2
10.0
19-2
-10.0
33.3
31.3
9.0
-6.4
33-3
4.8
10.6
-7-4
0.94
0.20
0.40
-0.37
0.94
0.17
0.19
0.12
43.35
8.70
12.36
-26.91
43-35
6.33
6.47
7.61
-114
49
34
229
-114
116
131
-104
.2
.8
.4
.5
.2
.1
• 3
.6
-5.9
4.7
3-1
15.9
-5.9
6.8
12.6
-7-7
0.48
0.70
-0.02
0.42
0.48
0.33
0.00
0.53
i
25.6D
15-91
-0.92
29-17
16.67
0.00
28.57
ALL VEHICLES
22
21.1 11.9 0.31 12.13 52.4
3.9
0.20
EMISSION RESULTS ARE : HC PPM HEXANE , CO MOLE % ,NOX PPM , 02 %
3-248
-------
TABLE 21 CONT'D
OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON ALL FAILED
VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE
MODE : IDLE (D)
DENVER
1972 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 111 VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
NO. OF CYL.
2
1
6
8
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 - 250
251 - 350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799
2800 - 3799
3800 _ i|79g
"800 . 5?99
ALL VEHICLES
^SSION RESULTS
1
9
10
14
2
0
4
5
27
4
4
16
12
6
16
13
1
36
ARE
HC
MEAN S.D.
190.
291.
343.
310.
240.
466.
217.
301.
466.
223.
330.
253.
387.
337.
240.
220.
307.
: HC
0
7
5
7
0
2
0
1
2
7
0
3
5
8
8
0
8
PPM
0.0
347.7
297.0
140.1
63.6
450.7
33-8
223.8
450.7
35.0
264.7
142.1
370.7
263.5
132.8
0.0
242.5
HEXANE
CO
MEAN S.D.
2.60
1.53
2.28
2.13
1.60
2.35
2.63
1.84
2.35
2.64
2.03
1.64
2.63
2.18
1.64
0.20
2.00
0.00
1.92
1.43
2.06
1.84
1.55
0.74
1.93
1.55
0.86
1.96
1.88
1.34
1.91
1.79
0.00
1.77
, CO MOLE %
NOX
MEAN S.D.
136
86
98
133
108
94
122
110
94
119
116
105
103
109
110
169
110
,NOX
.4
.0
.1
.5
.6
.1
.6
.7
.1
.2
.1
.5
.2
.4
.7
.2
.5
PPM
0.0
36.0
32.6
74.7
10.7
21.4
39.7
61.4
21.4
45.0
52.5
71.7
23.7
56.5
66.6
0.0
55.5
, 02
02
MEAN S.D.
0.50
1.84
0.96
1.84
0.80
0.80
0.58
1.78
0.80
0.60
1.70
1.77
0.72
1.72
1.59
1.50
1.50
%
0.00
1.35
0.97
1.30
0.71
0.58
0.38
1.29
0.58
0.43
0.89
1.73
0.47
1.06
1.60
0.00
1.23
3-349
-------
TABLE 21 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON PHASR
PASSED VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE a
MODE : 30 MPH
DENVER
1971 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 30 VEHICLES
NC
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
NO. OF CYL.
2
4
6
8
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 - 250
251 - 350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799
2800 - 3799
3800 - 4799
4800 - 5799
ALL VEHICLES
). OF
VEH
1
2
5
11
3
1
3
1
17
4
1
12
5
4
3
12
3
22
]
MEAN
270.0
260.0
208.0
187.7
191-7
15.0
266.7
160.0
205.6
203.7
160.0
217.1
178.0
203.7
233-3
185.4
243-3
203.2
HC
S.]
0
84
72
71
177
0
92
0
74
146
0
82
45
146
63
77
51
86
D.
.0
.9
.2
.0
.5
.0
.9
.0
.5
.9
.0
.7
.5
.9
.5
.5
.3
.1
C
MEAN
1.60
2.50
2.25
1.88
2.02
0.75
2.38
2.40
2.01
1.97
2.40
1.97
2.13
1.97
2.50
1.93
1.98
2.02
0
S.D.
0.00
0.71
1.00
0.72
1.19
0.00
0.64
0.00
0.82
0.97
0.00
0.81
0.93
0.97
0.95
0.74
1.05
0.81
K
MEAN
1095.0
583.6
827.7
615.3
1160.3
121.2
1543-0
229.8
686.5
1187.5
229.8
689.2
679.8
1187.5
660.0
572.1
1018.4
756.8
IOX
s.:
0
72
448
362
1130
0
724
0
346
924
0
393
232
924
432
323
242
515
D.
.0
.4
.2
.8
.5
.0
.3
.0
.4
.7
.0
.6
.2
.7
.6
.0
.3
.9
MEAN'
0.70
0.55
0.18
2.52
0.90
0.40
0.97
3-90
1.61
0.82
3-90
1.83
1.08
0.82
1.67
1.85
1.37
1.57
)2
S.D.
0.00
0.0?
0.15
1.65
0.56
0.00
0.4?
0.00
1.5?
0.48
0.00
1.75
0.98
0.48
1.9*
1.75
1.16
1.51
EMISSION RESULTS ARE : HC PPM HEXANE , CO MOLE % ,NOX PPM , 02 %
3-250
-------
TABLE 21 CONT'D
O..MMARY OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST PROCEDURE EXHAUST EMISSION REDUCTIONS
SUMMAKi ur QN pHASE 1 pASSED VEHJCLES AFTER MAINTENANCE
MODE : 30 MPH
DENVER
1974 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 30 VEHICLES
NC
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
NO. OF CYL.
2
1)
6
8
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 - 250
251 - 350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799
2800 - 3799
3800 - 4799
1800 - 5799
). OF
VEH
1
2
5
11
3
1
3
1
17
4
1
12
5
4
3
12
3
IMP
50.
142.
-13-
18.
206.
685.
-23.
70.
24.
153.
70.
40.
-14.
153.
16.
44.
-33.
1
'R
0
5
0
6
7
0
3
0
1
7
0
0
0
7
7
2
3
iC
JIMPR
15-6
35.4
-6.7
9.0
51.9
97-9
-9.6
30.4
10.5
43.0
30.4
15.6
-8.5
43-0
6.7
19.2
-15.9
IMPR
-0.05
3.40
-0.24
-0.02
1.58
4.05
0.08
0.60
0.31
1.07
0.60
0.77
-0.80
1.07
0.42
0.46
-0.30
CO
% IMPR
-3-23
57-63
-11.94
-0.88
43.98
84.38
3.38
20.00
13.23
35.25
20.00
28.05
-59-67
35.25
14.29
19-08
-17.82
IMF
398.
-91.
108.
11.
-136.
-12.
-282.
10.
77.
-215.
10.
-14.
298.
-215.
43.
115.
-60.
N(
'R
2
0
7
3
9
6
8
1
8
2
1
0
3
2
9
3
5
DX
%JMPR
26.7
-18.5
11.6
1.8
-13.4
-11.6
-22.4
4.2
10.2
-22.1
4.2
-2.1
30.5
-22.1
6.2
16.8
-6.3
(
IMPR
0.10
0.20
0.04
0.22
1.73
5.40
-0.07
-0.20
0.19
1.30
-0.20
0.09
0.44
1.30
-0.07
0.12
0.60
D2
%JMPE
12.50
26.67
7.69
7.97
65.82
93-10
-7-41
-5.41
10.75
61.18
-5.41
4.76
28.95
61.18
-4.17
6.33
30.51
VEHICLES
22
49-8 19.7 0.46. 18.51 21.5 2.8 0.38 19.35
ASSIGN
RESULTS ARE : HC PPM HEXANE , CO MOLE % ,NOX PPM , 02 %
3-251
-------
TABLE 21 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON PHASE 1
PASSED VEHICLES BEFORE MAINTENANCE '
MODE : IDLE (D)
DENVER
1974 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 30 VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
NO. OF CYL.
2
4
6
8
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 - 250
251 - 350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799
2800 - 3799
3800 - 4799
4800 - 5799
1
2
4
10
1
1
0
0
17
1
0
12
5
1
2
12
3
HC
MEAN S.D.
360
240
275
200
1950
1950
232
1950
232
232
1950
325
229
181
.0
.0
.0
.5
.0
.0
.1
.0
.1
.0
.0
.0
.2
• 7
0.0
14.1
79.4
51.9
0.0
0.0
69.5
0.0
72.5
69-7
0.0
49.5
65-3
38.2
CO
MEAN S.D.
2.90
0.67
3.68
2.87
5.00
5.00
2.80
5.00
2.97
2.40
5.00
4.85
2.80
1.47
0.00
0.74
2.29
1.64
0.00
0.00
1.81
0.00
1.90
1.71
0.00
2.76
1.63
1.04
NOX
MEAN S.D.
103
84
132
96
10
10
103
10
82
155
10
93
92
156
.5
.7
.0
.1
.0
.0
.7
.0
.1
.4
.0
.9
.1
.6
0.0
0.7
103.4
61.4
0.0
0.0
66.4
0.0
23-7
106.5
0.0
13-7
63-5
88.7
02
MEAN S.D,
0.50
3.15
0.55
2.69
8.10
8.10
2.15
8.10
2.28
1.82
8.10
o.io
2.31
2.53
™*
0.00
0.35
O.M
2.13
0.00
0.00
1.95
0.00
1.85
2.38
o.oo
O.H
1.75
3.01
ALL VEHICLES 18 327.5 410.5 2.92 1.83 98.5 68.1 2.18
EMISSION RESULTS ARE : HC PPM HEXANE , CO MOLE % ,NOX PPM , 02 %
2$
3-252
-------
TABLE 21 CONT'D
OF FEDERAL -THREE MODE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON PHASE 1
PASSED VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE
MODE : IDLE (D)
DENVER
1974 MODEL- YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 30 VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
NO. OF CYL.
2
1
6
8
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 - 250
251 - 350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799
2800 - 3799
3800 _ 47QQ
48°o . 5799
1
2
4
10
1
1
0
0
17
1
0
12
5
1
2
12
3
HC
MEAN S.D.
280
210
245
159
45
45
192
45
199
176
45
290
183
161
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.4
.0
.2
.0
.0
.0
.7
.7
0.0
56.6
81.9
43.0
0.0
0.0
66.4
0.0
77.9
21.0
0.0
14.1
62.1
50.1
CO
MEAN S.D.
1.80
1.25
1.49
0.73
6.25
6.25
1.03
6.25
1.02
1.05
6.25
2.07
0.85
1.07
0.00
1.06
0.76
0.83
0.00
0.00
0.85
0.00
0.82
1.01
0.00
0.39
0.63
1.50
NOX
MEAN S.D.
171
116
162
122
19
19
134
19
116
177
19
150
130
139
.7
.2
.3
.7
.0
.0
.1
.0
.2
.3
.0
• 3
.2
.0
0.0
21.4
68.3
45.5
0.0
0.0
49-8
0.0
31.1
62.8
0.0
30.4
47.9
79-6
02
MEAN S.D.
0.50
1.45
0.62
4.07
0.40
0.40
2.74
0.40
3.02
2.08
0.40
0.60
2.85
3.73
0.00
0.49
0.22
2.39
0.00
0.00
2.45
0.00
2.67
1.89
0.00
0.14
2.73
0.93
ALL VEHICLES
18 184.2 73-1 1.32 1.48 127-7 55.4 2.61 2.44
EMISSION
RESULTS ARE : HC PPM HEXANE , CO MOLE % ,NOX PPM , 02 %
3-253
-------
TABLE 21 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST PROCEDURE EXHAUST EMISSION REDUCTION*
ON PHASE 1 PASSED VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE Wi
MODE : IDLE (D)
DENVER
1974 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 30 VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL
IMPORTS
NO. OF
2
4
6
8
MOTORS
CYL.
1
2
4
10
1
1
0
0
17
HC
IMPR $IMPR
80.
30.
30.
41.
1905.
1905.
39.
0
0
0
5
0
0
7
22.2
12.5
10.9
20.7
97.7
97.7
17.1
CO
IMPR $IMPR
1.10
-0.58
2.19
2.14
-1.25
-1.25
1.77
37.93
-85.19
59.52
74.67
-25.00
-25.00
63-23
NOX
IMPR fclMPR
-68.2
-31-5
-30.3
-26.5
-9.0
-9.0
-30.5
-65.9
-37.2
-22.9
-27-6
-90.0
-90.0
-29.4
IMPR
0.00
2.00
-0.08
-1.38
7.70
7-70
-0.59
02
tfTlmn
r-UiTIi
0.00
57.9?
-13.W
-51.30
95.06
95.«
-27.61
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 -
251 -
250
350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA
1800 -
2800 -
3800 -
4800 -
WEIGHT
2799
3799
4799
5799
1
0
12
5
1
2
12
3
1905.
32.
56.
1905.
35.
45.
20.
0
9
0
0
0
4
0
97-7
14.2
24.1
97.7
10.8
19.8
11.0
-1.25
1.95
1.35
-1.25
2.77
1.95
0.39
-25.00
65.64
56.08
-25.00
57.22
69.75
26.82
-9.0
-34.0
-21.9
-9.0
-56.4
-38.2
17.6
-90.0
-41.5
-14.1
-90.0
-60.1
-41.4
11.3
7.70
-0.73
-0.26
7-70
-0.20
-0.51
-1.20
95-06
-32.12
-112)
90
-50.00
JT.J
ALL VEHICLES
18 143.3 43.8 1.60
-29.3 -29.7
-0.13
EMISSION RESULTS ARE : HC PPM HEXANE , CO MOLE % ,NOX PPM , 02 %
3-254
-------
TABLE 21 CONT'D
OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON PHASE 1
v PASSED VEHICLES BEFORE MAINTENANCE
MODE : IDLE (N)
DENVER
1974 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 30 VEHICLES
NO
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
NO. OF CYL.
2
4
6
8
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 - 250
251 - 350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799
2800 - 3799
3800 . 4?99
4800 . 5?99
ALL VEHICLES
MISSION RESULTS
. OF
VEH
1
2
5
11
3
1
3
1
17
4
1
12
5
4
3
12
3
22
ARE
HC
MEAN S.D.
280
305
236
141
193
280
161
70
198
191
70
195
205
191
203
202
136
191
: HC
.0
.0
.0
.8
.3
.0
.7
.0
.5
.2
.0
.8
.0
.2
.3
.1
.7
.4
PPM
0.0
205.1
125.8
63.1
87.5
0.0
49.3
0.0
111.9
71.6
0.0
106.1
138.0
71.6
115.9
126.4
35-5
104.9
HEXANE
CO
MEAN S.D.
4.00
0.44
3-60
2.60
3.93
1.30
4.63
1.20
2.76
3.80
1.20
2.69
2.91
3.80
3-90
2.46
2.28
2.88
•s
0.00
0.37
1.65
2. OK
2.51
0.00
1.50
0.00
2.01
2.07
0.00
2.13
1.93
2.07
2.65
1.94
1.77
2.00
, CO MOLE % ,
NOX
MEAN S.D.
65.
55.
97.
55.
50.
13-
66.
31.
69-
52.
31.
57.
98.
52.
54.
70.
70.
64.
NOX
1
6
3
7
1
0
1
1
6
9
1
5
7
9
1
0
8
8
PPM
0.0
5.0
95.1
20.4
33-8
0.0
11.4
0.0
53.1
28.1
0.0
16.3
95.2
28.1
20.0
63.7
16.7
48.6
, 02
02
MEAN S.D.
0.40
3.45
0.46
3.08
2.13
4.90
0.60
3.50
2.34
1.67
3-50
2.48
1.98
1.67
1.40
2.54
2.83
2.27
%
0.00
0.49
0.25
2.41
2.40
0.00
0.26
0.00
2.28
2.16
0.00
2.06
2.99
2.16
1.82
1.99
3.89
2.18
3-255
-------
TABLE 21 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON PHASE
PASSED VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE
MODE : IDLE (N)
DENVER
1974 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 30 VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
VEHICLE
MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL
IMPORTS
NO. OF
2
4
6
8
MOTORS
CYL.
1
2
5
11
3
1
3
1
17
HC
MEAN S.D.
210.0
135.0
194.0
117.7
245.0
40.0
308.3
65.0
144.1
0.
49.
59.
51.
177.
0.
67.
0.
58.
0
5
4
8
6
0
9
0
3
CO
MEAN S.D.
2.20
0.90
1.86
0.87
2.87
2.40
3.10
0.55
1.13
0.00
0.85
1.00
1.10
0.64
0.00
0.50
0.00
1.04
NOX
MEAN S.D.
80.8
69.6
120.9
54.7
53.4
19.0
66.1
33.1
78.6
0.0
12.0
117.8
14.2
30.5
0.0
10.2
0.0
66.4
02
MEAN S.D.
0.40
1.45
0.56
4.47
1.07
0.50
1.00
6.60
2.85
......
0.00
0.64
0.26
2.73
0.67
0.00
0.75
0.00
2.77
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 -
251 -
250
350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA
1800 -
2800 -
3800 -
4800 -
ALL VEH:
WEIGHT
2799
3799
4799
5799
ICLES
4
1
12
5
4
3
12
3
22
241.2
65.0
150.0
130.0
241.2
168.3
135.0
130.0
158.?
145.
0.
65.
37.
145.
90.
56.
52.
ftfi.
2
0
6
4
2
0
9
0
5
2.93
0.55
1.03
1.38
2.93
1.82
0.84
1.40
1 Hi
0.54
0.00
0.90
1.41
0.54
1.13
0.59
2.08
1 1ft
54.4
33.1
59.0
125.5
54.4
58.3
83.9
62.5
79.1
25.0
0.0
13.5
115.1
25.0
24.0
79-1
14.1
60.1
0.87
6.60
3.12
2.20
0.87
2.57
3.02
3.67
2.66
0.67
0.00
3.01
2.25
0.67
3.50
3.06
1.6'
2.70
EMISSION RESULTS ARE : HC PPM HEXANE , CO MOLE % ,NOX PPM , 02 %
3-256
-------
TABLE 21 CONT'D
OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST PROCEDURE EXHAUST EMISSION REDUCTIONS
ur rm^ pHASE 1 PASSED VEHJCLES AFTER MAINTENANCE
MODE : IDLE (N)
DENVER
1974 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 30 VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL
IMPORTS
NO. OF
2
4
6
8
MOTORS
CYL.
1
2
5
11
3
1
3
1
17
HC
IMPR SJIMPR
70.0
170.0
42.0
24.1
-51.7
240.0
-146.7
5.0
54.4
25.0
55.7
17.8
17.0
-26.7
85.7
-90.7
7.1
27.4
CO
IMPR JIMPR
1.80
45.00
-0.46 -104.55
1.74
1.73
1.07
-1.10
1.53
0.65
1.63
48.33
66.57
27.12
-84.62
33.09
54.17
59.02
NOX
IMPR JIMPR
-15.7
-14.0
-23.6
1.1
-3-3
-6.0
-0.0
-2.0
-8.9
-24.1
-25.2
-24
1
-6
-46
-0
-6
-12
.2
.9
.7
.2
.0
.5
.8
IMPR
0.00
2.00
-0.10
-1.39
1.07
4.40
-0.40
-3.10
-0.51
02
JIMPR
0.00
57.97
-21.74
-45.13
50.00
89.80
-66.67
-88.57
-21.91
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 -
251 '-
250
350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA
1800 .
2800 -
3800 .
((Oft*
1800 .
WEIGHT
2799
3799
4799
5799
ALL VEHICLES
EMISSION
RESULTS
4
1
12
5
4
3
12
3
22
.#
ARE
-50.0
5.0
45.8
75.0
-50.0
35.0
67.1
6.7
33.2
: HC PPM
-26.1
7-1
23. 4
36.6
-26.1
17.2
33.2
4.9
17.3
HEXANE ,
0.87
0.65
1.67
1.53
0.87
2.08
1.62
0.88
1.45
, CO MOLE
23.03
54.17
61.92
52.58
23.03
53.42
65.76
38.69
50.28
% ,NOX
-1.5
-2.0
-1.5
-26.8
-1.5
-4.2
-13.9
8.4
-7.3
PPM ,
-2
-6
-2
-27
-2
-7
-19
11
-11
02 %
.8
.5
.6
.1
.8
.8
.8
.8
.2
0.80
-3.10
-0.63
-0.22
0.80
-1.17
-0.48
-0.83
-0.39
47.76
-88.57
-25.50
-11.11
47.76
-83.33
-19.02
-29.41
-17.23
3-257
-------
TABLE 21 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON ALL
• VEHICLES BEFORE MAINTENANCE
MODE '50 MPH
DENVER
1974 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 30 VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
VEHICLE
MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL
IMPORTS
NO. OF
2
4
6
8
MOTORS
CYL.
1
4
7
13
5
1
6
4
19
MEAN
*45.0
196.2
179.3
147.5
142.0
330.0
102.5
157.5
175.7
HC
S;D.
0
66
34
83
107
- o
35
26
76
.0
.5
.2
.0
• 3 »
.0
.0
-3
.8
CO
MEAN < S.D.
1.50
3.55
2.63
2.43
2.37
3-80
1.86
2.55
2.76
0.00
2.62
0.95
2.30
1.72
0.00
1.42
0.51
2.25
NOX
MEAN S.D.
2986.4
1146.4
1418.2
1124.2
1662.5
604.1
2018.9
1242.7
1196.8
0.0
798.7
500.0
752.9
1197-5
0.0
1064.5
543.7
733-8
02
MEAN S.D.
1 00
1.30
0.64
2.27
2.12
5.10
1.37
2.27
1.57
0.00
1.22
0.1]
1.5?
1-51
0.00
1.22
U8
1.31
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 -
251 -
250
350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA
1800 -
2800 -
3800 -
4800 -
WEIGHT
2799
3799
4799
5799
7
4
12
7
7
6
12
5
135.0
157.5
203-7
127.6
135.0
182.5
182.1
137.6
91
26
77
48
91
44
84
55
.7
.3
.6
.6
.7
.5
.9
.7.-"
2.14
2.55
3.27
1.88
2.14
2.63
3.00
2.16
1.49
0.51
2.59
1.19
1.49
0.92
2.69
1.16
1816.8
1242.7
1121.3
1326.1
1816.8
1504.6
1043.6
1231-8
1109-2
543-7
874.2
428.4
1109.2
842.1
678.8
528.8
1.90
2.27
1.82
1.16
1.90
1.78
1.82
'1.30
1.80
U8
1.«
1.2)
1.80
1.58
1.53
ALL VEHICLES
30
163.8 76.0 ' 2.58 1.92 1347-6 830.0 i
EMISSION RESULTS ARE : HC PPM HEXANE , CO MOLE % ,-NOX PPM , 02 %
3-258
-------
TABLE 21 CONT'D
OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON ALL PHASE 1
v VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE
MODE 50 MPH
DENVER
1974 MODEL- YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 30 VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
NO. OF CYL.
2
4
6
8
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 - 250
251 - 350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799
2800 - 3?99
3800 - 4799
4800 - 5799
ALL VEHICLES
.*
^SSION RESULTS
1
4
7
13
5
1
6
4
19
7
4
12
7
7
6
12
5
30
ARE
HC
MEAN S.D.
230.
165.
190.
139-
104.
12.
127
151.
167-
111.
151.
185.
136.
111.
181.
162.
148.
152.
• HC
0
0
6
6
4
0
5
2
3
0
2
4
3
0
7
8
0
0
PPM
0.0
43-6
44.4
61.7
61.9
0.0
35.2
44.8
62.0
54.2
44.8
65-3
43-8
54.2
59-0
64.4
49-3
61.3
HEXANE
CO
MEAN S.D.
1.40
2.65
2.87
2.52
1.66
0.90
1-93
2.80
2.61
1.79
2.80
2.87
2.16
1.79
2.75
2.81
2.11
2^.44
0.00
1.01
1.21
2.40
1.99
0.00
1.74
0.81
2.12
1.64
0.81
2.49
1.32
1.64
1.01
2.52
1.24
1.88
, CO MOLE %
NOX
MEAN S.D.
2364.2
1107.8
1201.5
1078.8
1689-5
389.1
2002.6
1066.8
1105.6
1772.1
1066.8
1086.9
1137-5
1772.1
1337-5
912.3
1260.0
1255-9
0.
350.
499-
693-
1373-
0.
1070.
344.
628.
1151.
344.
720.
480.
1151-
584.
619-
401.
784.
,0
6
2
1
3
0
4
8
1
9
8
1
6
9
3
5
7
7
02
MEAN S.D.
0.80
0.67
0.93
2.11
2.18
1.40
1.82
1.97
1.48
1.76
1-97
1.83
0.87
1.76
1.53
1.82
1.00
1.61
0.00
0.19
0.83
1.71
0.97
0.00
1.18
1.47
1.51
1.08
1.47
1.74
0.75
1.08
1.33
1.76
0.85
1.38
,NOX PPM , 02 %
3-259
-------
TABLE 21 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST PROCEDURE EXHAUST EMISSION REDUCTIONS
ON ALL PHASE 1 VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE ^
MODE : 50 MPH
DENVER
1974 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 30 VEHICLES
NO OF
VEH
VEHICLE
MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL
IMPORTS
NO. OF
2
4
6
8
MOTORS
CYL.
1
4
7
13
5
1
6
4
19
HC
IMPR JIMPR
15.
31-
-11.
7
37-
318.
-25-
6.
8.
0
3
3
9
6
0
0
3
4
6.1
15.9
-6.3
5.4
26.5
96.4
-24.4
4.0
4.8
CO
IMPR JIMPR
0.10
0.90
-0.24
-0.09
0.71
2.90
-0.07
-0.25
0.15
6.67
25-35
-9-24
-3-86
29-96
76.32
-4.04
-9-80
5.50
NOX
IMPR *IMPR
622.
38.
216.
45.
-27-
215.
16.
175.
91-
2
6
7
4
0
0
4
9
2
20.8
3-4
15.3
4.0
-1.6
35.6
0.8
14.2
7-6
02
IMPR
-------
TABLE 21 CONT'D
OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON ALL PHASE 1
VEHICLES BEFORE MAINTENANCE
MODE 30 MPH
DENVER
1974 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 30 VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
NO OF CYL.
2
4
6
8
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 - 250
251 - 350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799
2800 - 3799
3800 - 4799
4800 . 5799
ALL VEHICLES
EMISSION RESULT
1
4
7
13
5
1
6
4
19
7
4
12
7
7
6
12
5
30
S ARE
MEAN
320.
338.
207-
201.
292.
700.
207-
255.
223.
277.
255.
257.
165.
277.
256.
229.
240.
• ur
0
7
9
5
0
0
5
0
4
9
0
1
7
9
7
6
0
3
DDI
HC
S.D.
0.
101.
52.
68.
236.
0.
61.
31.
96.
194.
31-
102.
50.
194.
45.
112.
57.
119.
L4 UI7V
0
8
6
4
3
0
9
1
2
5
1
1
0
5
0
4
3
3
AMI?
CO
MEAN S.D.
1.55
4.72
2.24
2.19
2.76
4.80
2.62
3-18
2.38
2.93
3.18
2.73
1.77
2.93
3-07
2.39
2.15
2.61
r*r\ MI
0.00
3.62
1.10
1.40
1.61
0.00
1.70
0.51
2.12
1-75
0.51
2.55
0.91
1.75
0.94
2.60
0.68
1.88
rw n> *
NOX
MEAN S.D.
1493-2
607-4
924.9
616.0
845.4
108.6
956.0
682.4
739-9
835.0
682.4
675.2
850.8
835.0
766.9
687.3
787.7
754.4
UTrtV D
0.0
445.3
399.5
332.6
670.7
0.0
487.1
424.0
434.3
548.0
424.0
505-0
274.8
548.0
499.2
452.1
317.8
447.4
DM r\o
02
MEAN S.D.
0.80
1.97
0.49
2.36
2.70
5.80
1.43
2.62
1.65
2.06
2.62
1.92
1.19
2.06
1.93
1.97
1.32
1.88
*
0.00
2.63
0.17
1.74
2.18
0.00
1.41
2.67
1.60
2.10
2.67
1.66
1.50
2.10
2.33
1.63
1.79
1.83
3-261
-------
TABLE 21 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON ALL PHASF
VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE H5E
MODE 30 MPH
DENVER
1974 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 30 VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
NO. OF CYL
2
4
6
8
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 - 250
251 - 350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799
2800 - 3799
3800 - 4799
4800 - 5799
ALL VEHICLES
EMISSION RESULTS
1
4
7
13
5
1
6
4
19
7
4
12
7
7
6
12
5
30
ARE
HC
MEAN S.D.
270
237
206
181
172
15
207
195
202
180
195
217
176
180
220
185
215
196
HC
.0
.5
.4
.2
.0
.0
.5
.0
.1
.0
.0
.1
.4
.0
.0
.4
.0
.0
PPM
0.0
56.8
59-5
67-1
129.4
0.0
88.9
28.9
72.4
109.0
28.9
82.7
44.6
109-0
44.7
77.5
61.0
76.7
HEXANE
CO
MEAN S.D.
1.60
2.75
2.52
2.03
1.81
0.75
2.29
3-10
2.04
2.07
3-10
1.97
2.18
2.07
2.92
1-93
2.11
2.19
, CO
0.00
0.50
1.04
0.82
1.18
0.00
1.12
0.66
0.78
1.17
0.66
0.81
0.76
1-17
0.84
0.74
0.77
0.91
MOLE %
NOX
MEAN S.D.
1095.0
627-1
765-3
590.7
925.5
121.2
1056.4
497-7
674.6
922.8
497.7
689.2
649-4
922.8
623-5
572.1
840.4
708.9
,NOX
0.
231.
396.
339-
867-
0.
708.
308.
337.
737-
308.
393-
235.
737-
338-
323-
337-
459-
PPM ,
0
0
6
4
6
0
6
1
0
1
1
6
7
1
1
0
8
0
02
02
MEAN S.D.
0.70
0.55
0.76
2.19
1.96
0.40
1.72
1.87
1.49
1.53
1.87
1.83
0.90
1.53
1.43
1.85
1.00
1.55
%
0.00
0.06
0.78
uc
1.62
0.00
1.57
1.63
1.53
1.52
1.63
1.75
0.86
1.52
1.75
0.9^
1.19
3-262
-------
TABLE 21 CONT'D
OIIMMARY OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST PROCEDURE EXHAUST EMISSION REDUCTIONS
SUMMAiu u QN ALL pHASE 1 VEHJCLES AFTER MAINTENANCE
MODE 30 MPH
DENVER
1974 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 30 VEHICLES
NO
i
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
NO. OF CYL.
2
11
6
8
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 - 250
251 - 350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799
2800 - 3799
3800 - i|799
1800 - 5799
ALL VEHICLES
ASSIGN RESULTS
OF
WE
1
4
7
13
5
1
6
4
19
7
4
12
7
7
6
12
5
30
ARE
]
IMPR
50.0
101.2
1.4
20.4
120.0
685.0
0.0
60.0
21.3
97-9
60.0
40.0
-10.7
97-9
36.7
44.2
-21.0
44.3
: HC PPM
HC
15-6
29-9
0.7
10.1
41.1
97.9
0.0
23.5
9-5
35.2
23-5
15-6
-6.5
35.2
14.3
19-2
-10.8
18.4
HEXANE ,
I
-0
1
-0
0
0
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
-0
0
0
0
0
0
CO
c
MPR
.05
.97
.29
.16
• 95
.05
• 32
.08
• 33
.86
.08
.77
.41
.86
.16
.46
.04
.42
MOLE
:o
5OMPR
-3-23
41.80
-12.78
7.10
34.42
84.38
12.42
2.36
13-99
29.27
2.36
28.05
-23.28
29-27
5.15
19.08
1.86
16.10
% ,NOX
I
IMPR
398.2
-19-7
159-6
25-3
-80.1
-12.6
-100.4
184.7
65-3
-87-9
184.7
-14.0
201.4
-87-9
143.4
115.3
-52.7
45-5
PPM ,
NOX
JIMI
26.
-3.
17-
4.
-9.
-11.
-10.
27-
8.
-10.
27-
-2.
23.
-10.
18.
16.
-6.
6.
02 %
>R
7
2
3
1
5
6
5
1
8
5
1
1
7
5
7
8
7
0
IMPR
0.10
1.42
-0.27
0.17
0.74
5.40
-0.28
0.75
0.16
0.53
0.75
0.09
0.29
0.53
0.50
0.12
0.32
0.33
02
12.50
72.15
-55.88
7-17
27.41
93-10
-19.77
28.57
9.87
25.69
28.57
4.76
24.10
25-69
25.86
6.33
24.24
17-41
3-263
-------
TABLE 21 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF FEDIUL THHE^MOD^TESI^BOCEDURyESULTS ON ALL PMSE
MODE • IDLE (D)
DENVER
19714 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 30 VEHICLES
NO
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
NO. OF CYL.
2
4
6
8
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 - 250
251 - 350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799
2800 - 3799 '
3800 - 4799
4800 - 5799
ALL VEHICLES
. OF
VEH
1
4
6
12
1
1
1
3
19
2
3
12
7
2
5
12
5
24
MEAN
360.0
307.5
286.7
220.0
1950.0
1950.0
390.0
373-3
233-7
1170.0
373-3
232.1
236.4
1170.0
354.0
229.2
208.0
329.2
HC
S.D
0.
81.
74.
72.
0.
0.
0.
25.
65.
1103-
25.
72.
57.
1103.
40.
65.
45.
354.
•
0
0
5
4
0
0
0
2
7
1
2
5
4
1
4
3
1
4
C
MEAN
2.90
4.56
4.78
3-71
5.00
5.00
7-20
8.77
3-20
6.10
8.77
2.97
3-60
6.10
7.20
2.80
3.52
4.14
0
S.D.
0.00
4.52
2.90
2.47
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.65
2.19
1.56
0.65
1.90
2.73
1.56
2.59
1.63
3.23
2.78
NC
MEAN
103
73
106
95
10
10
131
53
99
70
53
82
128
70
69
92
119
91
.5
.7
.1
.5
.0
.0
.3
.8
.4
.7
.8
.1
.9
.7
.8
.1
.0
.3
)X
S.D.
0.0
16.3
90.3
58.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
19.8
64.0
85.8
19-8
23-7
98.2
85-8
26.9
63-5
81.4
61.9
MEAN
0.50
3-17
0.53
2.32
8.10
8.10
0.30
2.17
1.97
4.20
2.17
2.28
1.44
4.20
1.46
2.34
1.72
2.18
02
S.D.
0.00
US
0.}i
2,11
0,00
0.00
0.00
2.3?
1.91
5-52
2-3?
1.85
2.05
5-52
1.7J
2.25
EMISSION RESULTS ARE : HC PPM HEXANE , CO MOLE % ,NOX PPM . 02 %
3-264
-------
TABLE 21 CONT'D
OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON ALL PHASE 1
VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE
MODE IDLE (D)
DENVER
1974 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 30 VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
NO. OF CYL.
2
4
6
8
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 - 250
251 - 350
MORE THAN 350
HBHTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799
2800 . 3?99
3800 - 4?9g
llOnn
4800 - 5799
ALL VEHICLES
EMISSION RESULTS
1
4
6
12
1
1
1
3
19
2
3
12
7
2
5
12
5
24
*
ARE
HC
MEAN S.D.
280
187
217
172
45
45
310
175
187
177
175
199
168
177
221
183
157
185
• HC
.0
.5
.5
.5
.0
.0
.0
.0
.9
.5
.0
.2
.6
.5
.0
.7
.0
.4
PPM
0.0
50.6
79-1
58.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
39.1
64.3
187-4
39.1
77.9
24.3
187.4
69.1
62.1
38.7
70.2
HEXANE
CO
MEAN S.D.
1.80
2.17
1.51
1.08
6.25
6.25
3-50
3-07
1.04
4.87
3.07
1.02
1.09
4.87
2.67
0.85
1.11
1.62
0.00
1.52
1.08
1.15
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.10
0.87
1.94
1.10
0.82
1.02
1.94
0.97
0.63
1.29
1.53
, CO MOLE %
NOX
MEAN S.D.
171
133
143
123
19
19
154
128
131
86
128
116
158
86
137
130
128
127
,NOX
.7
.2
.5
.2
.0
.0
.1
.6
.8
.5
.6
.2
.6
.5
.2
.2
.1
.6
PPM
0.0
36.3
61.8
42.9
0.0
0.0
0.0
50.7
47-7
95.5
50.7
31-1
61.0
95.5
40.7
47.9
59-1
50.6
, 02
02
MEAN S.D.
0.50
1.10
1.17
3.52
0.40
0.40
0.30
1.37
2.62
0.35
1.37
3.02
1.94
0.35
1.06
2.85
2.88
2.27
*
0.00
0.50
0.88
2.52
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.07
2.3^
0.07
1.07
2.67
1.57
0.07
0.87
2.73
1.36
2.21
3-265
-------
TABLE 21 CONT'D
OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST PROCEDURE EXHAUST EMISSION REDUCTION*
of muMWL inn PHASE ^ VEHICLES ^gp MAINTENANCE ^"wis
MODE IDLE (D)
DENVER
1974 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 30 VEHICLES
N(
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
NO. OF CYL.
2
4
6
8
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 - 250
251 - 350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799
2800 - 3799
3800 - 4799
4800 - 5799
D. OF
VEH
1
4
6
12
1
1
1
3
19
2
3
12
7
2
5
12
5
IMP
80.
120.
69-
47-
1905.
1905.
80.
198.
45.
992.
198.
32.
67-
992.
133.
45.
51.
H
R
0
0
2
5
0
0
0
3
8
5
3
9
9
5
0
4
0
C
22.2
39-0
24.1
21.6
97-7
97.7
20.5
53.1
19.6
84.8
53-1
14.2
28.7
84.8
37.6
19.8
24.5
IMPR
1.10
2.39
3.27
2.63
-1.25
-1.25
3.70
5.70
2.16
1.22
5.70
1.95
2.51
1.22
4.53
1.95
2.41
CO
*B
37
52
68
70
-25
-25
51
65
67
20
65
65
69
20
62
69
68
4PR
.93
• 33
• 36
.85
.00
.00
.39
.02
.38
.08
.02
.64
.84
.08
• 92
.75
.47
N
IMPR
-68.2
-59.6
-37-4
-27.7
-9-0
-9.0
-22.7
-74.8
-32.4
-15-9
-74.8
-34.0
-29.7
-15-9
-67-4
-38.2
-9-1
OX
-65.9
-80.9
-35.3
-29.0
-90.0
-90.0
-17-3
-139-1
-32.6
-22.5
-139-1
-41.5
-23-0
-22.5
-96.6
-41.4
-7.6
IMPR
0.00
2.07
-0.63
-1.20
7-70
7-70
0.00
0.80
-0.65
3-85
0.80
-0.73
-0.50
3-85
o.io
-0.51
-1.16
02
JIB
0.00
65.$
-118.15
-51.il
9W*
95J
o.n
36.32
-32.1
91.61
36.52
-32.12
-31.6
91-fi
2f,«
.21-11
-6?-«
ALL VEHICLES 24 143.7
60.95
-39-8
-0.09
EMISSION RESULTS ARE : HC PPM HEXANE , CO MOLE % ,NOX PPM , 02 %
3-266
-------
TABLE 21 CONT'D
OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON ALL PHASE 1
VEHICLES BEFORE MAINTENANCE
MODE IDLE (N)
DENVER
1974 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 30 VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
VEHICLE
MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL
IMPORTS
NO. OF
2
4
6
8
MOTORS
CYL.
1
4
7
13
5
1
6
4
19
MEAN
280.0
316.2
250.7
160.8
452.0
280.0
409-2
271.2
201.6
HC
S.D.
0.0
119.3
113.7
74.6
499-3
0.0
459.2
135.2
105.9
CO
MEAN S.D.
4
4
4
3
3
1
4
6
3
.00
.22
.59
.46
.71
.30
.66
.42
.24
0.00
4.42
2.31
2.82
2.91
0.00
2.67
3.55
2.46
NOX
MEAN S.D.
65.1
54.4
81.5
56.7
43-3
13-0
57.8
42.8
67.2
0.0
7-3
82.3
20.5
28.3
0.0
23-9
13-6
50.7
02
MEAN S.D.
0.40
3-20
0.44
2.68
3.64
4.90
2.32
2.47
2.14
0.00
1.72
0.21
2.41
4.54
0.00
4.31
2.15
2.23
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 -
251 -
250
350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA
1800 -
2800 .
3800 -
4800 ~
WEIGHT
2799
3799
4799
5799
7
4
12
7
7
6
12
5
390.7
271.2
195.8
211.4
390.7
270.8
202.1
173.0
422.0
135.2
106.1
113-4
422.0
104.9
126.4
56.4
4
6
2
4
4
6
2
4
.18
.42
.69
.18
.18
.03
.46
• 31
2.75
3.55
2.13
2.86
2.75
2.93
1.94
3.29
51.4
42.8
57-5
83-7
51.4
50.4
70.0
60.9
27.6
13-6
16.3
81.9
27.6
15.8
63-7
18.2
2.69
2.47
2.48
1.54
2.69
1.77
2.54
1.88
4.05
2.15
2.06
2.55
4.05
1.99
1.99
3-05
ALL VEHICLES 30
ASSIGN RESULTS ARE
255.0 228.2
3-
2.79 60.2 43-2 2.31 2.65
HC PPM HEXANE , CO MOLE % ,NOX PPM , 02
3-267
-------
TABLE 21 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF FEDEHAL THREE^ODEJEST PROCEgmE.RESDLTS ON ALL PMSE
MODE IDLE (N)
DENVER
1974 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 30 VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
VEHICLE MFG.
.AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
NO. OF CYL.
2
4
6
8
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 - 250
251 - 350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799
2800 - 3799
3800 - 4799
4800 - 5799
ALL VEHICLES
EMISSION RESULTS
1
4
7
13
5
1
6
4
19
7
4
12
7
7
6
12
5
30
ARE
HC
MEAN S.D.
210.0
132.5
168.6
129-2
349-0
40.0
365.8
116.2
139.2
319.3
116.2
150.0
120.7
319-3
150.8
135.0
117.0
178.2
0.
33-
68.
61.
282.
0.
220.
38.
57.
236.
38.
65.
37.
236.
61.
56.
45.
141.
0
0
2
5
1
0
5
2
6
0
2
6
9
0
5
9
2
6
0
MEAN
2.20
0.97
1.87
1.37
1.81
2.40
2.63
1.46
1.16
2.60
1.46
1.03
1.40
2.60
1.79
0.84
1.42
1.54
0
S.D.
0.00
0.50
1.11
1.76
1.52
0.00
2.19
1.18
1.03
2.00
1.18
0.90
1.25
2.00
1.06
0.59
1.59
1.41
N'
MEAN
80.8
83-6
104.4
57-7
47-5
19-0
60.0
72.1
77.2
54.1
72.1
59-0
108.4
54.1
71.7
83.9
63-7
71.1
ox
S.D.
0
20
100
15
24
0
20
33
62
24
33
13
98
24
26
79
10
52
: HC PPM HEXANE . CO MOI.R * .NOX PPM ,
.0
.8
• 3
.5
.4
.0
.4
.3
.8
.2
• 3
.5
.4
.2
.6
.1
.1
.7
02
02
MEAN S.D.
0.40
1.27
0.89
3-88
3-32
0.50
2.7?
2.87
2.64
2.44
2.87
3-12
1.83
2.44
2.10
3.02
2.56
2.63
$
0.00
0.53
0.83
2.53
3.98
o.oo
3-81
2.62
2.61
3-58
2.62
3.M
1.55
3.58
/
3.06
.A
2.00
2.80
3-268
-------
TABLE 21 CONT'D
OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST PROCEDURE EXHAUST EMISSION REDUCTIONS
***• _. _ _ . . • ««• • A *«*r^
MODE : IDLE (N)
DENVER
1974 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 30 VEHICLES
NO
1
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
NO. OF CYL.
2
l)
6
8
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 - 250
251 - 350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799
^vJOO ~ 0*7nr\
j I MM
joOO - U7QQ
4800 - 579g
ALL VEHICLES
ASSIGN RESULTS
. OF
/EH
1
4
7
13
5
1
6
4
19
7
4
12
7
7
6
12
5
30
.*
ARE
I
IMPR
70.0
183-7
82.1
31.5
103-0
240.0
43-3
155.0
62.4
71.4
155.0
45.8
90.7
71.4
120.0
67.1
56.0
76.8
: HC PPM
iC
JIMPR
25.0
58.1
32.8
19-6
22.8
85.7
10.6
57.1
30.9
18.3
57.1
23-4
42.9
18.3
44.3
33-2
32.4
30.1
HEXANE .
I
1
3
2
2
1
-1
2
4
2
1
4
1
2
1
4
1
2
2
, CO
c
MPR
.80
.24
.71
.09
.90
.10
• 03
.96
.08
.58
.96
.67
.78
.58
.24
.62
.89
.35
MOLE
:0
45.00
76.90
59.19
60.31
51.11
-84.62
43-58
77-24
64.10
37-88
77-24
61.92
66.50
37.88
70.30
65.76
67-05
60.41
% ,NOX
I
IMPR
-15.7
-29.3
-22.9
-1.0
-4.2
-6.0
-2.2
-29-3
-10.1
-2.7
-29-3
-1.5
-24.7
-2.7
-21.3
-13.9
-2.8
-10.9
PPM ,
NOX
JIM
-24
-53
-28
-1
-9
-46
-3
-68
-15
-5
-68
-2
-29
-5
-42
-19
-4
-18
02 %
PR
.1
• 9
.0
.8
.7
.2
.8
.4
.0
.3
.4
.6
.5
• 3
.2
.8
.6
.1
IMPR
0.00
1.93
-0.44
-1.21
0-32
4.40
-0.45
-0.40
-0.51
0.24
-0.40
-0.63
-0.29
0.24
-0.33
-0.48
-0.68
-0.32
02
JIMPR
0.00
60.16
-100.00
-45.12
8.79
89.80
-19.42
-16.16
-23-65
9.04
-16.16
-25.50
-18.52
9.04
-18.87
-19-02
-36.17
-13-71
3-269
-------
TABLE 21 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF FEDERAL
ON ALL
MODE : 50 MPH
DENVER
1974 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 100 VEHICLES
NC
VEHICLE MFG.
-AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
NO. OF CYL.
2
4
6
8
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 - 250
251 - 350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799
2800 - 3799
3800 - 4799
4800 - 5799
ALL VEHICLES
). OF
VEH
1
6
8
9
7
0
12
5
14
12
5
8
6
10
11
7
3
31
MEA
80.
136.
225.
134.
125.
159.
146.
153.
159.
146.
166.
135.
173-
148.
157.
111.
154.
1
N
0
7
6
2
7
6
0
4
6
0
9
5
0
2
1
0
6
1C
S.D.
0.0
39.3
88.1
47.4
54.0
85.2
44.5
71.6
85.2
44.5
56.8
90.1
91.4
56.5
60.3
90.5
71.9
C
MEAN
0.35
2.29
3.52
1.89
2.10
3-30
2.31
1.63
3-30
2.31
1.26
2.13
2.70
2.54
1.77
2.23
2.39
0
S.D.
0.00
1.18
2.98
1.18
1.26
2.47
1.21
1.11
2.47
1.21
0.90
1.25
2.37
2.03
0.97
1.66
1.89
I
MEAN
1766.9
1433.7
1069.1
1188.2
1584.9
1344.3
1491.9
1222.8
1344.3
1491-9
1429-7
946.8
1600.6
1364.0
979.1
948.7
1313-2
JOX
S.
0
799
1041
771
801
1003
529
801
1003
529
999
334
1195
689
366
435
833
D.
.0
• 3
.8
.6
.7
.6
.8
.5
.6
.8
.5
.2
.9
.1
.3
.3
.4
I
MEAN
1.10
1.10
0.77
0.93
1.19
1.05
1.26
0.99
1.05
1.26
1.31
0.52
1.37
1.16
0.69
0.17
1.05
32
S.D.
••••
0.00
1.03
0.60
0.85
1.29
1.05
1.05
0.??
1.09
1.05
0.87
0.15
1.16
0.99
0.32
0.0^
0.92
EMISSION RESULTS ARE
HC PPM HEXANE , CO MOLE % ,NOX PPM , 02 %
3-270
-------
TABLE 21 CONT'D
OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON ALL FAILED
VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE
MODE : 50 MPH
DENVER
1974 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 100 VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
NO. OF CYL.
2
4
6
8
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 - 250
251 - 350
MORE THAN 350
!NERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799
2800 - 3?99
3800 - 4?99
'tsoo
1
6
8
9
7
0
12
5
14
12
5
8
6
10
11
7
3
MEAN
80.0
150.0
243.7
121.7
122.6
151.5
151.0
165.0
151.5
151.0
142.5
195.0
149.5
162.1
160.0
161.7
HC
S.D.
0.
16.
75.
52.
53.
73.
50.
85.
73.
50.
61.
108.
77.
44.
117.
64.
0
4
3
9
1
6
5
5
6
5
3
9
9
6
3
5
CO
MEAN S.D.
0.70
2.73
3-76
1.79
2.57
3.42
2.60
1.94
3.42
2.60
1.45
2.60
2.94
2.90
1.72
2.63
0.00
0.62
2.40
0.81
1.45
2.07
1.21
1.00
2.07
1.21
0.80
0.90
2.21
1.44
0.83
1.38
NOX
MEAN S.D.
1642
1069
722
1026
1058
982
1296
872
982
1296
852
898
946
1071
892
996
.5
.7
• 3
.6
.0
.6
.4
.3
.6
.4
• 3
.9
.9
.1
.0
.7
0.0
428.0
414.8
644.9
564.2
714.3
418.0
335.5
714.3
418.0
398.3
262.7
718.0
497.3
409-3
284.9
02
MEAN S.D.
1.00
0.58
0.95
1.21
1.37
1.02
1.14
1.05
1.02
1.14
1.41
0.57
1.16
1.10
1.07
0.47
0.00
0.17
0.77
1.22
1.26
1.03
0.89
1.00
1.03
0.89
1.22
0.21
1.11
0.90
1.14
0.12
VEHICLES 3-i
*
RESULTS ARE
157.5 74.5 2.62 1.64 983.4 530.3 1-05 0.97
HC PPM HEXANE , CO MOLE % ,NOX PPM , 02 %
3-271
-------
TABLE 21 CONT'D
Of FEDERAL THRENODE WT™jg
MODE : 50 MPH
DENVER
1974 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 100 VEHICLES
NC
VEHICLE MFG.
.AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
NO. OF CYL.
2
4
6
8
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 - 250
251 - 350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799
2800 - 3799
3800 - 4799
4800 - 5799
ALL VEHICLES
). OF
VEH
1
6
8
9
7
0
12
5
14
12
5
8
6
10
11
7
3
•31
P
IMPR
o.o
-13-3
-18.1
12.6
3-1
8.1
-5.0
-11.6
8.1
-5.0
24.4
-59-5
23.5
-13.9
-2.9
-50.7
o n
1C
$IMPR
0.0
-9-8
-8.0
9.4
2.5
5-1
-3.4
-7.5
5.1
-3.4
14.6
-43-9
13-6
-9.4
-1.8
-45.6
4 »
IMPR
-0.35
-0.44
-0.23
0.09
-0.47
-0.12
-0.29
-0.31
-0.12
-0.29
-0.19
-0.47
-0.24
-0.36
0.04
-0.40
CO
%m
-100.
-19.
-6.
5.
-22.
-3.
-12.
-18.
-3-
-12.
-14.
-22.
-9.
-14.
2.
-17-
PR
00
19
56
00
37
76
55
99
76
55
85
26
07
09
51
91
IMP
124.
364.
346.
161.
526.
361.
195-
350.
361.
195-
577.
47.
653-
293-
87-
-48.
NO
R
4
0
8
6
9
7
5
5
7
5
5
9
7
0
1
0
X
JIMPR
7.0
25.4
32.4
13-6
33.2
26.9
13-1
28.7
26.9
13-1
40.4
5-1
40.8
21.5
8.9
-5.1
**.r- 4
IMPR
0.10
0.52
-0.18
-0.28
0.11
0.03
0.12
-0.06
0.03
0.12
-0.07
-0.05
0.21
0.06
-0.39
o.oo
n no
02
Jim
— -«»„
9.0§
16-9?
-22.58
-2946
f.69
3.11
9.52
-6.52
3-17
9.52
-5.61
.9.68
15-33
5.«
-56-25
o.oo
0-31
EMISSION RESULTS ARE
-1.9 -0.23 -9.84 329-9 25-1
HC PPM HEXANE , CO MOLE % ,NOX PPM , 02 %
3-272
-------
TABLE 21 CONT'D
OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON ALL FAILED
VEHICLES BEFORE MAINTENANCE
MODE : 30 MPH
DENVER
1974 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 100 VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
NO. OF CYL.
2
*
6
8
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 - 250
251 - 350
M°RB THAN 350
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799
2800 - 3?99
3800 . i,799
^800
1
6
8
9
7
0
12
5
14
12
5
8
6
10
11
7
3
MEAN
230.
225.
344.
248.
159.
260.
265.
231.
260.
265.
276.
170.
278.
256.
242.
128.
0
8
4
3
3
4
0
4
4
0
9
8
0
8
9
3
HC
S.D.
0.
74.
189.
86.
52.
168.
35.
112.
168.
35.
97.
108.
177.
90.
88.
100.
0
5
0
2
1
2
0
0
2
0
3
0
6
5
6
5
CO
MEAN S.D.
1.95
2.28
2.97
2.83
1.88
3.22
2.97
1.75
3-22
2.97
1.59
1.96
2.93
2.76
1.72
2.09
0.00
1.37
2.75
2.02
1.08
2.43
0.71
1.40
2.43
0.71
1.69
1.01
2.67
1.42
1.45
1.33
NOX
MEAN S.D.
430.0
1136.7
702.5
510.4
896.5
689.0
842.8
804.1
689.0
842.8
840.0
756.2
854.9
708.7
863.3
450.5
0.0
427.1
574.2
391.8
584.7
545.8
404.0
563-3
545.8
404.0
684.8
404.7
671.6
501.4
406.3
257.6
02
MEAN S.D.
0.60
1.52
0.65
0.91
1.54
1.07
1.58
0.94
1.07
1.58
1-31
0.45
1.38
1.31
0.67
0.33
0.00
2.17
0.56
0.95
1.61
1-33
2.42
0.82
1.33
2.42
0.93
0.15
1.40
1.75
0.25
0.06
VEHICLES 31
RESULTS ARE
248.1 127.3 2.52 1.90 765.8 522.1 1.09
: HC PPM HEXANE , CO MOLE % ,NOX PPM , 02 %
3-273
-------
TABLE 21 CONT'D
SUMMARY OK FEDERAL THRK.MOg.JgT raOCEWjK.MSUt.TS ON ALL FAILED
MODE : 30 MPH
DENVER
1974 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 100 VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
NO OF CYL.
2
4
6
8
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 - 250
251 - 350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799
2800 - 3799
3800 - 4799
4800 - 5799
ALL VEHICLES
1
6
8
9
7
0
12
5
14
12
5
8
6
10
11
7
3
31
HC
MEAN S.D.
215
220
266
192
169
204
223
216
204
223
216
215
210
224
209
185
212
.0
.8
.2
.8
• 3
.2
.0
.1
.2
.0
• 9
.0
.5
.1
• 3
.0
.6
0.0
45.2
89.8
85.5
57.8
92.0
35.3
81.2
92.0
35.3
88.4
78.7
103.1
42.3
102.6
47.7
78.6
C
MEAN
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
2
3
1
2
2
.80
.62
.77
.24
.34
.80
.16
.98
.80
.16
.84
.18
.51
.17
.45
.33
.49
0
S.D.
0.00
0.72
1.45
1.49
0.94
1.14
0.48
1.23
1.14
0.48
1.61
0.49
1.45
0.76
0.87
0.12
1.18
NOX
MEAN S.D.
655.3
930.8
547-2
516.5
600.2
506.3
722.2
698.6
506.3
722.2
610.4
816.3
530.7
565.3
929-9
477-8
628.0
0.0
320.6
363.2
367.4
323.8
284.9
343-4
412.3
284.9
343-4
400.3
434.3
319.6
328.3
380.7
279.5
359-0
02
MEAN S.D.
0.50
0.65
0.8?
1.27
1.37
0.99
0.92
1.14
0.99
0.92
1.50
0.65
1.14
1.02
1.21
0.43
1.05
0.00
0.27
0.70
1.26
1.5?
1.26
0.88
1.00
1.26
0.88
1.20
0.31
1.35
0.98
/
0.0^
1.06
EMISSION RESULTS ARE : HC PPM HEXANE , CO MOLE % ,NOX PPM , 02 $
3-274
-------
TABLE 21 CONT'D
OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST PROCEDURE EXHAUST EMISSION REDUCTIONS
vr FAILED VEHJCLES AFTER MAINTENANCE
MODE : 30 MPH
DENVER
1974 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 100 VEHICLES
NC
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
NO. OF CYL.
2
4
6
8
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 - 250
251 - 350
"ORE THAN 350
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799
2800 - 3799
3800 . 4799
JlDAM
4800 - 5799
). OF
VEH
1
6
8
9
7
0
12
5
14
12
5
8
6
10
11
7
3
!
IMPR
15-0
5-0
78.1
55.6
-10.0
56.2
42. 0
15.4
56.2
42.0
60.0
-44. 2
67-5
32.7
33.6
-56.7
iC
$IMPR
6.5
2.2
22.7
22.4
-6.3
21.6
15.8
6.6
21.6
15.8
21.7
-25.9
24.3
12.7
13-8
-44.2
IMPR
-0.85
-0.33
0.20
0.59
-0.47
0.42
-0.19
-0.24
0.42
-0.19
-0.24
-0.22
0.42
-0.41
0.27
-0.25
CO
*I
-43
-14
6
20
-24
13
-6
-13
13
-6
-15
-11
14
-15
15
-11
MPR
.59
.60
.74
.86
.81
.04
.40
.43
.04
.40
• 31
• 39
.28
.03
.85
.82
IMF
-225.
205.
155.
-6.
296.
182.
120.
105.
182.
120.
229.
-60.
324.
143.
-66.
-27.
N(
'R
2
8
4
1
3
7
6
4
7
6
6
1
2
4
5
3
)X
5HMPR
-52.4
18.1
22.1
-1.2
33.1
26.5
14.3
13-1
26.5
14.3
27-3
-8.0
37-9
20.2
-7.7
-6.1
IMPR
0.10
0.87
-0.23
-0.36
0.17
0.07
0.66
-0.19
0.07
0.66
-0.19
-0.20
0.24
0.29
-0.54
-0.10
02
JIMPR
16.67
57.14
-34.62
-39.02
11.11
7.03
41.77
-20.45
7-03
41.77
-14.29
-44.44
17-39
22.22
-80.85
-30.00
VEHICLES 31
-»
RESULTS ARE
35.5 14.3 0.03 1.03 137.8 18.0 0.05 4.42
HC PPM HEXANE , CO MOLE % ,NOX PPM , 02 %
3-275
-------
TABLE 21 CONT'D
SUMWAR* or FEDERAL THREE MODE Kg]r^HOCggEMaOLTS OH ALL FAIlED
VEHICLES BEFORE MAINTENANCE
MODE : IDLE (D)
DENVER
1974 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 100 VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
NO. OF CYL.
2
4
6
8
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 - 250
251 - 350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799
2800 - 3799
3800 - 4799
4800 - 5799
ALL VEHICLES
EMISSION RESULTS
0
6
5
9
0
0
2
4
14
2
4
8
6
2
8
7
3
20
ARE
MEAN
316.7
283.0
646.7
395.0
362.5
492.5
395.0
362.5
686.9
233-3
405.0
568.7
457-9
190.0
456.7
: HC PP
HC
S.D.
100
133
589
7
29
513
7
29
615
116
21
579
364
99
428
M HE
.7
.2
.1
.1
.9
.4
.1
.9
.7
.9
.2
.7
.9
.6
.6
XANF
CO
MEAN S.D.
6.67
5.28
5.74
5.35
8.02
5.38
5-35
8.02
5.40
5.35
5.50
6.71
5.57
4.81
5-91
: rn M
2.29
3-19
3.60
2.62
1.58
3-27
2.62
1.58
3.64
3.05
2.40
3.09
3-32
3-69
3.04
ni i? *
NOX
MEAN S.D.
58
82
67
140
66
59
140
66
48
73
102
66
58
77
68
wrw
.6
.7
.8
.2
• 9
.1
.2
.9
.5
• 3
.2
.1
.7
.1
.8
PI
27.0
34.7
43-1
12.5
30.7
28.4
12.5
30.7
16.8
35.7
41.1
42.1
32.1
26.8
36.3
>M . 02
02
MEAN S.B.
1.60
0.56
1.50
0.40
1.95
1.24
0.40
1.95
1.70
0.62
0.50
2.05
0.99
0-53
1.30
f
1.63
0.1?
1.78
0.11
1.58
1.15
0.1*
1.98
1.81
0.23
0.28
i.tf
1.2t
0.21
1.19
3-276
-------
TABLE 21 CONT'D
OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON ALL FAILED
VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE
MODE : IDLE (D)
DENVER
1974 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 100 VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
NO. OF CYL.
2
4
6
8
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 - 250
251 - 350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799
2800 - 3?99
3800 . 4?99
"800 . 5?99
ALL VEHICLES
EMISSION RESULTS
0
6
5
9
0
0
2
4
14
2
4
8
6
2
8
7
3
20
ARE
HC
MEAN S.D.
150
232
329
330
173
262
330
173
320
184
305
321
190
168
251
: HC
.0
.0
.4
.0
.7
.1
.0
.7
.6
.2
.0
.9
• 7
.3
.2
PPM
32.9
81.7
273-5
28.3
32.0
233.2
28.3
32.0
295.7
78.6
7.1
291.4
99.7
37.5
198.5
HEXANE
CO
MEAN S.D.
1.89
1.60
1.49
2.45
2.65
1.24
2.45
2.65
1.23
1.24
3.25
2.26
0.77
0.94
1.64
1.30
1.36
1.42
1.48
1.23
1.18
1.48
1.23
1.43
0.88
0.35
1.24
0.82
1.11
1.31
, CO MOLE %
NOX
MEAN S.D.
119
126
132
302
143
97
302
143
83
115
114
155
87
148
126
,NOX
.0
.1
.4
• 3
.1
.1
.3
.1
.3
.4
.9
.8
.7
.6
.8
56.3
58.0
122.5
209-6
50.7
42.4
209.6
50.7
17.6
59.6
55.4
129.0
21.7
65.4
88.9
02
MEAN S.D.
1.37
1.64
2.64
0.35
1.47
2.40
0.35
1.47
3.00
1.60
0.50
1.89
2.73
1.67
2.01
0.52
0.72
1-97
0.07
0.90
1.52
0.07
0.90
1.80
0.34
0.28
1.41
1.76
0.32
1.47
PPM , 02 %
3-277
-------
-------
TABLE 21 CONT'D
OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON ALL FAILED
VEHICLES BEFORE MAINTENANCE
MODE : IDLE (N)
DENVER
1974 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 100 VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
NO. OF CYL.
2
1
6
8
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 - 250
251 - 350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799
2800 , 3?99
3800 . 479g
"800 . 5?99
ALL VEHICLES
EMISSION RESULTS
1
6
8
9
7
0
12
5
14
12
5
8
6
10
11
7
3
31
-#
ARE
HC
MEAN S.D.
650
314
345
550
425
392
386
471
392
386
621
270
459
488
387
185
426
: HC
.0
.2
.6
.6
.0
.1
.0
.1
.1
.0
.9
.0
.5
.2
.1
.0
.8
PPM
0.0
158.7
155.1
557.0
438.5
327.5
151.6
474.4
327.5
151.6
577.3
183.1
347.4
520.8
182.3
74.7
376.3
HEXANE
CO
MEAN S.D.
10.00
6.35
6.29
5.91
4.42
5.38
8.06
5.55
5.38
8.06
5.35
5.82
5.25
6.61
5.92
5.28
5.89
0.00
2.19
3-19
3.72
4.17
3.73
1.61
3-43
3.73
1.61
3.70
3.36
3.65
3-30
3.50
3.98
3.39
, CO MOLE %
NOX
MEAN S.D.
20
45
42
44
39
43
45
40
43
45
36
46
39
44
37
54
42
,NOX
.0
.1
.6
.7
.8
.1
.3
.7
.1
.3
.1
.8
.7
.6
.2
.8
.3
PPM
0.0
15.3
16.7
21.5
25.3
25.8
19-0
13.6
25.8
19-0
11.2
15.1
23.6
20.5
11.5
15.6
19-4
, 02
02
MEAN S.D.
1.00
1.50
0.50
1.47
2.47
1.61
1.66
1.21
1.61
1.66
1.70
0.55
1.90
1.76
0.68
0.47
1.44
%
0.00
1.72
0.21
1.93
3.89
3-06
1.88
1.55
3.06
1.88
1.95
0.16
3-31
1.98
0.63
0.15
2.24
3-279
-------
TABLE 21 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF FEDGHAL ^MODE^ST PHOCTOUHE.HBSULTS ON ALL F4ILED
MODE : IDLE (N)
DENVER
1974 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 100 VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
NO. OF CYL.
2
4
6
8
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 - 250
251 - 350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799
2800 - 3799
3800 - 4799
4800 - 5799
1
6
8
9
7
0
12
5
14
12
5
8
6
10
11
7
3
MEAN
140.0
190.8
198.1
398.3
318.6
277.1
142.0
332.1
277.1
142.0
421.9
212.5
312.5
325.5
223.6
138.3
HC
S.D.
0.
143.
78.
603.
223.
176.
21.
491.
176.
21.
641.
148.
177.
557.
127.
75.
0
5
0
4
8
1
7
5
1
7
3
6
8
4
4
9
C
MEAN
2
1
2
1
2
3
1
1
3
1
1
1
3
2
0
1
.50
• 30
.46
.80
• 78
.11
.80
• 37
.11
.80
.27
.51
• 34
• 03
• 91
.18
0
S.D.
0.00
0.68
1.49
2.15
2.84
2.40
0.99
1.37
2.40
0.99
1.73
0.83
2.50
1.44
0.96
0.97
NOX
MEAN S.D.
50
74
64
67
44
58
80
59
58
80
53
65
49
74
58
70
.1
• 3
.7
.5
.7
• 9
• 3
.0
• 9
• 3
.9
.8
.6
.4
.2
.5
0.0
27-9
21.0
39-3
12.5
37.4
25.2
17.2
37-4
25.2
13-3
20.6
19-2
38.5
17.9
8.4
02
MEAN s.;.
•«»
0.60 o.::
1.45 0.?.
1.01 3.?i
2.73 2.ii
2.44 3«
1.60 2.!i
1.46 O.c:
2.33 I'5'
1.60 2.o5
1.46 O.So
3.01 2.5!
1.42 0.?;
1.75 3-'J
1.79 ll62
2.61 ^
1.20 0.5«
ALL VEHICLES
280.2 347.2
2.12 1.93
62.4 28.1 1-91
EMISSION RESULTS ARE : HC PPM HEXANE , CO MOLE % ,NOX PPM , 02 %
3-280
-------
TABLE 21 CONT'D
OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST PROCEDURE EXHAUST EMISSION REDUCTIONS
ur FAILED VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE
MODE : IDLE (N)
DENVER
1974 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 100 VEHICLES
N(
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
NO. OF CYL.
2
4
6
8
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 - 250
251 - 350
"ORE THAN 350
^ERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799
2800 _ 3799
3800 . 4799
tsoo - 5799
D. OF
VEH
1
6
8
9
7
0
12
5
14
12
5
8
6
10
11
7
3
IMF
510.
123.
147-
152.
106.
115.
244.
138.
115.
244.
200.
57.
147.
162.
163.
46.
H
'R
0
3
5
2
4
0
0
9
0
0
0
5
0
7
6
7
1C
5&IMPR
78.5
39.3
42.7
27.6
25.0
29.3
63.2
29.5
29-3
63.2
32.2
21.3
32.0
33.3
42.3
25.2
(
IMPR
7-50
5.05
3.84
4.11
1.64
2.27
6.26
4.18
2.27
6.26
4.07
4.32
1.92
4.58
5.02
4.10
:o
5&IMPR
75.00
79-53
60.97
69.55
37-09
42.11
77.67
75.24
42.11
77.67
76.17
74.11
36.50
69-26
84.71
77.60
N
IMPR
-30.1
-29.2
-22.1
-22.7
-4.9
-15.8
-35.1
-18.3
-15-8
-35.1
-17-8
-19-0
-9-9
-29.8
-21.0
-15.7
OX
*IMF
-150.
-64.
-52.
-50.
-12.
-36.
-77.
-45.
-36.
-77.
-49.
-40.
-25.
-66.
-56.
-28.
>R
0
8
0
8
2
7
4
0
7
4
3
6
0
8
5
7
IMPR
0.40
0.05
-0.51
-1.26
0.03
0.01
0.20
-1.12
0.01
0.20
-1.31
-0.87
0.15
-0.03
-1.94
-0.73
02
40.00
3-33
-102.50
-85.80
1.16
0.52
12.05
-92.44
0.52
12.05
-76.69
-157.58
7.89
-1.55
-286.08
-157-14
VEHICLES 31
.*
^SULTS ARE
146.6 34.4 3.77- 64.06 -20.0 -47-3 -0.47 -32.69
HC PPM HEXANE , CO MOLE % ,NOX PPM , 02 %
3-281
-------
TABLE 21 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON PHASP i
PASSED VEHICLES BEFORE MAINTENANCE MASE 1
MODE : 50 MPH
DENVER
1973 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 27 VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
HC
MEAN S.D.
C
MEAN
0
S.D.
NOX
MEAN S.D.
02
MEAN S.D.
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
0
1
2
11
2
145
140
113
155
.0
.0
.6
.0
0.0
14.1
60.2
7.1
1.90
2.12
2.11
3.85
0.00
0.88
1.60
2.33
3185.5
522.2
828.8
1577.0
0.0
14.5
546.5
1042.9
0.90
0.45
2.33
1.55
0.00
0.21
1,11
1.3*
NO. OF CYL.
2
4
6
8
0
2
1
13
155
145
117
.0
.0
.7
7.1
0.0
56.0
3.85
1.90
2.11
2.33
0.00
1.49
1577.0
3185.5
781.7
1042.9
0.0
512.0
1.55
0.90
2.04
1.3»
0.00
1.23
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN
151 -
251 -
MORE THAN
151
250
350
350
2
1
6
7
155
145
149
90
.0
.0
.2
.7
7.1
0.0
51.2
47.4
3.85
1.90
2.41
1.86
2.33
0.00
1.48
1.56
1577.0
3185.5
900.7
679.6
1042.9
0.0
574.7
472.1
1.55
0.90
2.95
1.26
1.3»
o.oo
1.02
0.80
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 -
2800 -
3800 -
4800 -
ALL VEHIC
2799
3799
4799
5799
I.RS
1
3
10
2
1£
150
151
121
82
* *\ li
.0
.7
.5
.5
*
0.0
7.6
60.5
31.8
2.20
3. 47
1.77
3.35
0.00
1.84
1.39
2.05
231M.4
1543.0
888.4
336.9
0.0
1427.3
530.1
276.5
— __ n
0.60
2.27
1.96
1.75
1 01
o.oo
1.21
1.29
1.06
1.20
2.32 1.58 1031.3 827.8
EMISSION RESULTS ARE : HC PPM HEXANE , CO MOLE * ,NOX PPM , 02
3-282
-------
TABLE 21 CONT'D
OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON PHASE 1
PASSED VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE
MODE : 50 MPH
DENVER
1973 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 27 VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
NO. OF CYL.
2
1
6
8
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
!51 - 250
251 - 350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799
2800 - 3799
3800 - 4?99
"800 . 5?99
ALL VEHICLES
0
1
2
11
2
0
2
1
13
2
1
6
7
1
3
10
2
16
HC
MEAN S.D.
135.0
145.0
106.4
155.0
155.0
135.0
112.3
155.0
135.0
138.3
90.0
210.0
108.3
124.0
65.0
11Q 1
0.
21.
52.
77.
77.
0.
50.
77.
0.
43.
46.
0.
23-
51.
7.
51
0
2
1
8
8
0
1
8
0
2
9
0
6
3
1
ii
CO
MEAN S.D.
1.80
1.95
1.45
3.50
3.50
1.80
1.53
3.50
1.80
1.65
1.43
3.80
2.07
1.49
1.90
1 7O
0.00
0.35
0.65
0.42
0.42
0.00
0.63
0.42
0.00
0.60
0.69
0.00
1.03
0.70
0.14
n ftft
NOX
MEAN S.D.
2389
547
982
1630
1630
2389
915
1630
2389
878
948
2090
1425
1014
522
1007
.1
.8
.7
.1
.1
.1
.8
.1
.1
.2
.0
.5
.1
.4
.2
1
0.0
108.6
796.6
651.1
651.1
0.0
745.9
651.1
0.0
392.7
990.8
0.0
865.0
831-3
101.4
flr>6 Q
02
MEAN S.D.
0.90
0.50
2.03
1.60
1.60
0.90
1.79
1.60
0.90
2.40
1.27
0.50
2.40
1.59
1.90
1 71
0.00
0.14
1.06
1.56
1.56
0.00
1.12
1.56
0.00
1.26
0.72
0.00
1.37
1.12
0.42
1 m
RESULTS ARE : HC PPM HEXANE , CO MOLE % ,NOX PPM , 02 %
3-283
-------
TABLE 21 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST PROCEDURE EXHAUST EMISSION REDUCTIONS
SUMMAHI (X ^gjj^jJsE t PASSED VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE UONS
MODE : 50 MPH
DENVER
1973 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 27 VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
VEHICLE
MFG.
•AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL
IMPORTS
NO. OF
2
4
6
8
MOTORS
CYL.
0
1
2
11
2
0
2
1
13
HC
IMPR JIMPR
10.0
-5.0
7.3
0.0
0.0
10.0
5.4
6.9
-3.6
6.4
0.0
0.0
6.9
4.6
CO
IMPR JIMPR
0.10
0.18
0.65
0.35
0.35
0.10
0.58
5.26
8.24
31.03
9.09
9.09
5.26
27.50
NOX
IMPR $IMPR
796
-25
-153
-53
-53
796
-134
.4
.6
.8
.1
.1
.4
.1
25.0
-4.9
-18.6
-3.4
-3.4
25.0
-17.2
IMPR
0.00
-0.05
0.30
-0.05
-0.05
0.00
0.25
02
Vm
"
0.00
-11.11
12.85
-3-23
-3.23
0.00
12.08
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 -
250
251 - 350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA
1800 -
2800 -
3800 -
4800 -
WEIGHT
2799
3799
4799
5799
ALL VEHICLES
2
1
6
7
1
3
10
2
16
0.0
10.0
10.8
0.7
-60.0
M3-3
-2.5
17.5
5.0
0.0
6.9
7.3
0.8
-40.0
28.6
-2.1
21.2
4.0
0.35
0.10
0.76
0.43
-1.60
1.40
0.28
1.45
0.52
9.09
5.26
31.49
23.08
-72.73
40.38
16.06
43.28
22.54
-53
796
22
-268
224
117
-126
-185
-65
.1
.4
.5
.3
.0
.9
.0
.2
.8
-3.4
25.0
2.5
-39.5
9.7
7.6
-14.2
-55-0
-6.4
-0.05
0.00
0.55
-0.01
0.10
-0.13
0.37
-0.15
0.19
-3.23
o.oo
18.W
-1.W
16.67
-5.88
18.88
.8.5?
10.1*
MISSION RESULTS ARE : HC PPM HEXANE , CO MOLE ( ,NOX PPM , 02 %
3-284
-------
TABLE 21 CONT'D
CTTMMARY OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON PHASE 1
SUMMAIU v PASSED VEHICLES BEFORE MAINTENANCE
MODE : 30 MPH
DENVER
1973 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 27 VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
NO. OF CYL.
2
4
6
8
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 - 250
251 - 350
MORE THAN 350
INERTH WEIGHT
1800 - 2799
2800 . 3?99
3800 . j,79g
h ft
Uftrin
800 - 5799
ALL VEHICLES
0
1
2
11
2
0
2
1
13
2
1
6
7
1
3
10
2
16
HC
MEAN S.D.
210
212
148
210
210
210
158
210
210
172
145
250
190
161
125
167
.0
.5
.2
.0
.0
.0
.1
.0
.0
.5
.7
.0
.0
.5
.0
.8
0.0
38.9
48.3
56.6
56.6
0.0
51.5
56.6
0.0
39.3
60.3
0.0
20.0
55.1
35.4
52.7
CO
MEAN S.D.
0.80
2.35
1.69
1.90
1.90
0.80
1.79
1.90
0.80
1.90
1.70
2.40
1.90
1.49
2.43
1.74
0.00
1.20
t.13
0.71
0.71
0.00
1.11
0.71
0.00
1.10
1.20
0.00
1.42
0.94
1.52
1.04
NOX
MEAN S.
2886.8
968.2
510.9
1468.3
1468.3
2886.8
581.3
1468.3
2886.8
545.6
611.8
1592.7
1460.7
703.1
186.9
8^6.?
0
848
354
176
176
0
440
176
0
389
509
0
1371
431
85
73Q
D.
.0
.0
.1
.0
.0
.0
.4
.0
.0
.6
.0
.0
.4
.5
.7
.7
02
MEAN S.D.
1.70
0.55
2.73
2.25
2.25
1.70
2.39
2.25
1.70
3.17
1.73
0.50
3.10
2.24
2.55
2.11
0.00
0.35
t.22
2.47
2.47
0.00
1.38
2.47
0.00
1.29
1.15
0.00
1.23
1.53
0.35
1.40
RESULTS ARE : HC PPM HEXANE , CO MOLE % ,NOX PPM , 02 %
3-285
-------
TABLE 21 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON PHASE
SUMMAMi ur r&u|J|£ED VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE A5fc>
MODE : 30 MPH
DENVER
1973 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 27 VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
NO. OF CYL.
2
4
6
8
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 - 250
251 - 350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799
2800 - 3799
3800 - 4799
4800 - 5799
ALL VEHICLES
0
1
2
11
2
0
2
1
13
2
1
6
7
1
3
10
2
16
HC
MEAN S.D.
180
215
161
162
162
180
170
162
180
184
157
215
136
180
142
169
.0
.0
.8
.5
.5
.0
.0
-5
.0
.2
.9
.0
.7
.5
.5
.7
0.0
77.8
68.4
74.2
74.2
0.0
69.3
74.2
0.0
68.0
73-3
0.0
37.9
73.0
67.2
65.0
CO
MEAN S.D.
0.65
2.35
1.49
f.30
1.30
0.65
1.62
1.30
0.65
1.52
t.71
2.00
1.12
1.40
2.50
1.^9
0.00
0.64
0.98
0.99
0.99
0.00
0.97
0.99
0.00
0.88
1.10
0.00
0.85
0.94
0.99
n,Q4
NOX
MEAN S.D.
2239
704
641
1048
1048
2239
651
1048
2239
528
756
1493
1007
756
363
ftnn
.8
.8
.6
.6
.6
.8
.3
.6
.8
.8
.4
.2
.7
.1
.5
3
0.0
657.4
621.6
628.7
628.7
0.0
598.8
628.7
0.0
357.8
763-2
0.0
1087-9
649.9
50.7
6Q1.9
02
MEAN S.D.
t.50
0.60
2.59
2.55
2.55
1.50
2.28
2.55
1.50
2.85
1.80
0.60
3.27
2.06
2.65
2.2T
0.08
0.28
!,«
2,%
2.11
0.00
1.51
2.16
0.80
1.61
111
0J
1.51
0.21
1.5'
EMISSION RESULTS ARE : HC PPM HEXANE , CO MOLE % ,NOX PPM , 02 %
3-286
-------
TABLE 21 CONT'D
OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST PRXEDURE EXHAUST EMISSION REDUCTIONS
ur row pHASE ^ pASSED VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE
MODE : 30 MPH
DENVER
1973 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 27 VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL
IMPORTS
NO. OF
2
4
6
8
MOTORS
CYL.
0
1
2
11
2
0
2
1
13
HC
IMPR 5&IMPR
30.0
-2.5
-13-6
47-5
47.5
30.0
-11.9
14.3
-1.2
-9.2
22.6
22.6
14.3
-7.5
CO
IMPR JIMPR
0.15
0.00
0.20
0.60
0.60
0.15
0.17
18.75
0.00
11.83
31-58
31.58
18.75
9.44
NOX
IMPR 5&IMPR
647.0
263-4
-130.7
419.7
419.7
647.0
-70.1
22.4
27.
-25.
28.
28.
22.
-12.
2
6
6
6
4
1
IMPR
0.20
-0.05
0.14
-0.30
-0.30
0.20
0.11
02
11.76
-9.09
5.00
-13.33
-13.33
11.76
4.50
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 -
251 -
250
350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA
1800 -
2800 .
3800 -
1800 -
WEIGHT
2799
3799
4799
5799
^ VEHICLES
EMISSION
RESULTS
2
1
6
7
1
3
10
2
16
ARE
47.5
30.0
-11.7
-12.1
35.0
53.3
-19.0
-17.5
-1.9
: HC PPM
22.6
14.3
-6.8
-8.3
14.0
28.1
-11.8
-14.0
-1.1
HEXANE ,
0.60
0.15
0.38
-0.01
0.40
0.78
0.10
-0.07
0.22
, CO MOLE
31.58
18.75
20.1,8
-0.84
16.67
41.23
6.35
-3.09
12.72
% ,NOX
419-7
647.0
16.9
-144.6
99.5
453.0
-53.0
-176.6
36.0
PPM ,
28.
22.
3.
-23.
6.
31.
-7.
-94.
4.
02 %
6
4
1
6
3
0
5
5
3
-0.30
0.20
0.32
-0.07
-0.10
-0.17
0.18
-0.10
0.06
-13-33
11.76
10.00
-4.13
-20.00
-5.38
8.04
-3.92
2.68
3-287
-------
TABLE 21 CONT'D
NUMMARY OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON PHASE
SUMMARY OF *bUgj{gE5nVEHICLES BEFORE MAINTENANCE ^
MODE : IDLE (D)
DENVER
1973 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 27 VEHICLES
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
NO. OF CYL.
2
4
6
8
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 - 250
251 - 350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799
2800 - 3799
3800 - 4799
4800 - 5799
AM. VFHTPT PC-
NO. OF
VEH
0
1
2
11
0
0
0
1
13
0
1
6
7
0
2
10
2
•» ii
MEAN
340.
275.
174.
340.
189.
340.
197.
182.
265.
195.
160.
HC
S.D
0 0.
0 84.
1 59.
0 0.
6 70.
0 0.
5 44.
9 90.
0 106.
5 78.
0 42.
CO
MEAN S.D.
0
9
2
0
4
0
2
3
1
5
4
4.60
3.52
1.84
4.60
2.10
4.60
1.75
2.39
2.95
2.24
1.75
0.00
0.67
1.06
0.00
1.17
0.00
0.88
1.37
2.33
1.27
0.92
NOX
MEAN
88
73
92
88
89
88
76
101
84
76
161
.4
.7
.5
.4
.6
.4
.1
.3
.3
.2
.6
S.D.
0.0
22.0
45.4
0.0
42.5
0.0
20.1
54.2
5.8
24.2
64.3
.. _ o
MEAN
1.40
0.35
3-36
1.40
2.90
1.40
4.05
1.91
3-70
2.37
4.00
o 70
02
S.D,
0.00
0.0?
2.02
O.Ofl
2.1?
O.Dfl
2.30
1.55
3.25
2.H
0$
2.12
200.4 78.7 2.27 1.31 89.6
EMISSION RESULTS ARE : HC PPM HEXANE , CO MOLE % ,NOX PPM , 02 %
3-288
-------
TABLE 2? CONT'D
QNMMARY OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON PHASE 7
SUMMAiu PASSED VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE
MODE : IDLE (D)
DENVER
7973 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 27 VEHICLES
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
NO. OF CYL.
2
4
6
8
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 75?
151 - 250
251 - 350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799
2800 - 37nn
wv «• V t U Q
3800 . j|7gg
llgnn
M°uo _ 5fgg
NO. OF
VEH
0
7
2
7?
0
0
0
7
73
0
7
6
7
0
2
70
2
MEAN
200.0
792.5
738.6
200.0
746.9
200.0
755.0
740.0
760.0
762.5
82.5
HC
S.
0
70
43
0
44
0
37
55
56
37
3
D.
.0
.6
.6
.0
.7
.0
.5
.3
.6
.4
.5
MEAN
2.00
7.47
0.97
2.00
7.05
2.00
7.24
0.89
2.55
0.98
0.38
CO
S.
0.
0.
7.
0.
0.
0.
7.
0.
0.
0.
0.
D.
00
32
02
00
96
00
23
77
78
8?
09
N<
MEAN
776.2
736.4
94.7
776.2
700.6
776.2
93-3
706.9
90.2
707.6
83.9
DX
S.D.
0.0
77.9
24.6
0.0
28.0
0.0
24.9
30.9
36.8
25.4
35.0
MEAN
2.70
0.80
3.77
2.70
3.26
2.70
4.70
2.54
3-05
3-02
4.70
02
S.D.
0.00
0.28
7.50
0.00
7.75
0.00
7.58
7.65
7.34
7.95
0.42
ALL VEHICLES
74
750.7 45.3 7.72 0.96 707.7 27.2 3-78 7.77
RESULTS ARE : HC PPM HEXANE , CO MOLE % ,NOX PPM , 02
3-289
-------
TABLE 21 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST PROCEDURE EXHAUST EMISSION
SUMMAKX u* rtugJfpHASE i PASSED VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE
MODE : IDLE (D)
DENVER
1973 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 27 VEHICLES
N
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
NO. OF CYL.
2
4
6
8
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 - 250
251 - 350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799
2800 - 3799
3800 - 4799
4800 - 5799
0. OF
VEH
0
1
2
11
0
0
0
1
13
0
1
6
7
0
2
10
2
IMPR
140.0
82.5
35.5
140.0
42.7
140.0
42.5
42.9
105.0
33.0
77.5
HC
*IMPR
41.2
30.0
20.4
41.2
22.5
41.2
21.5
23.4
39-6
16.9
48.4
IMPR
2.60
2.05
0.86
2.60
1.04
2.60
0.51
1.50
0.40
1.26
1.36
CO
JKD
56
58
46
56
49
56
29
62
13
56
78
NPR
.52
.16
.93
.52
.83
.52
.05
.87
.56
• 35
.00
IMPR
-27.8
-62.7
-1.5
-27.8
-10.9
-27.8
-17.2
-5.6
-5.9
-31.4
77.8
NOX
%m
-31
-85
-1
-31
-12
-31
-22
-5
-7
-41
48
PR
.4
.2
.6
.4
.2
.4
.6
.5
.0
.2
.1
IMPR
-0.70
-0.45
-0.35
-0.70
-0.36
-0.70
-0.05
-0.63
0.65
-0.65
-0.10
02
ymi
-50.00
-128.5?
-10.21
-50.00
-12.17
-50.00
-1.23
-32.M
11.51
.2.50
ALL VEHICLES 14 49.6 24.8 1.16 50.80 -12.1 -1:
EMISSION RESULTS ARE : HC PPM HEXANE , CO MOLE % ,NOX PPM , 02 %
-0.39 -T3>
3-290
-------
TABLE 21 CONT'D
OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON PHASE 1
ur pASSED VEHICLES BEFORE MAINTENANCE
MODE : IDLE (N)
DENVER
1973 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 27 VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
NO. OF CYL.
2
4
6
8
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 - 250
251 - 350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799
2800 - 3799
3800 . n?99
oo . 5799
0
1
2
11
2
0
2
1
13
2
1
6
7
1
3
10
2
HC
MEAN S.D.
250
219
124
117
117
250
139
117
250
148
131
175
153
144
105
.0
.0
.5
.5
.5
.0
.1
.5
.0
.3
.1
.0
• 3
.8
.0
0.0
58.0
68.6
81.3
81.3
0.0
73.9
81.3
0.0
69-7
82.0
0.0
95.0
83.5
7.1
CO
MEAN S.D.
1
3
1
4
4
1
1
4
1
1
2
6
1
2
1
.85
.75
.64
.00
.00
.85
.97
.00
.85
.61
.27
.00
.45
.20
.50
0.00
1.20
1.18
2.83
2.83
0.00
1.38
2.83
0.00
1.26
1.50
0.00
0.83
1.40
1.41
NOX
MEAN S.D.
48.1
52.1
48.1
71.6
71.6
48.1
48.7
71.6
48.1
47.9
49.4
79.2
50.8
50.5
44.1
0.0
8.5
14.0
10.6
10.6
0.0
13-1
10.6
0.0
17.8
8.9
0.0
12.2
14.3
8.5
02
MEAN S.D.
1.30
0.30
3.72
2.40
2.40
1.30
3-19
2.40
1.30
4.55
2.03
0.30
4.30
2.58
4.30
0.00
0.14
2.43
2.97
2.97
0.00
2.57
2.97
0.00
2.77
1.83
0.00
2.91
2.49
1.27
ALL VEHICLES
16
143.3 75.3 2.21 1.59 51.5 14.4 2.97 2.48
RESULTS ARE : HC PPM HEXANE , CO MOLE % ,NOX PPM , 02
3-291
-------
TABLE 21 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF FEDE^TH^MODE TE^PROCEDURE^ESULTS ON PHASE ,
MODE : IDLE (N)
DENVER
1973 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 27 VEHICLES
NO
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
NO. OF CYL.
2
4
6
8
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 - 250
251 - 350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799
2800 - 3799
3800 - 4799
4800 - 5799
ALL VEHICLES
. OF
VEH
0
1
2
11
2
0
2
1
13
2
1
6
7
1
3
10
2
16
HC
MEAN S.D.
135.0
120.0
96.4
135.0
135.0
135.0
100.0
135.0
135.0
103.3
97.1
220.0
78.3
112.0
65.0
106.6
0.0
0.0
52.5
120.2
120.2
0.0
48.8
120.2
0.0
62.7
38.2
0.0
49.1
49.1
21.2
55.4
C(
MEAN
1
2
1
2
2
1
1
2
1
0
1
4
1
0
2
1
.90
.35
.05
.47
.47
.90
.25
.47
.90
.62
.79
.20
.22
.94
.90
.44
D
S.D.
0.00
1.48
1.51
2.44
2.44
0.00
1.52
2.44
0.00
0.36
1.95
0.00
0.60
0.94
3.68
1.56
NC
MEAN
83
70
52
106
106
83
54
106
83
50
58
66
91
57
48
63
.2
.6
.1
.3
.3
.2
.9
.3
.2
.8
.5
.1
.2
.3
.6
.1
)X
S.D.
0.0
3-5
10.6
56.8
56.8
0.0
12.0
56.8
0.0
10.7
12.6
o.o
51-7
11.8
14.9
25.8
02
MEAN
1.50
0.50
3-92
2.85
2.85
1.50
3-39
2.85
1.50
H.43
2.50
0.50
3-73
3.11
4.25
3.2t
S.D,
0.00
O.tt
Ui
3.32
3.32
0.00
2.21
3-32
o.oo
2.18
1.9<
o.oo
1.91
2.*
0.78
2.21
EMISSION RESULTS ARE : HC PPM HEXANE , CO MOLE % ,NOX PPM , 02 %
3-292
-------
TABLE 21 CONT'D
FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST PROCEDURE EXHAUST EMISSION REDUCTIONS
r ON pHASE t PASSED VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE
MODE : IDLE (N)
DENVER
1973 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 27 VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL
IMPORTS
NO. OF
2
4
6
8
MOTORS
CYL.
0
1
2
11
2
0
2
1
t3
HC
IMPR *IMPR
115.0
99.0
28.2
-17.5
-17.5
115.0
39.1
46.0
45.2
22.6
-14.9
-14.9
46.0
28.1
IMPR
-0.05
1.40
0.60
t.53
t.53
-0.05
0.72
CO
5HMPR
-2
37
36
38
38
-2
36
.70
.33
.29
.12
.12
.70
.59
NOX
IMPR JIMPR
-35.1
-18.5
-4.0
-34.7
-34.7
-35.1
-6.2
-72.9
-35.6
-8.2
-48.4
-48.4
-72.9
-12.7
IMPR
-0.20
-0.20
-0.20
-0.45
-0.45
-0.20
-0.20
02
JIMPR
-15.38
-66.67
-5.38
-18.75
-18.75
-15.38
-6.27
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 -
251 -
250
350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA
1800 -
2800 -
3800 -
4800 -
WEIGHT
2799
3799
5799
^ VEHICLES
anssioK
1 RESULTS
2
1
6
7
1
3
10
2
16
ARE :
-17.5
115.0
45.0
34.0
-45.0
75.0
32.8
40.0
36.7
HC PPM
-14.9
46.0
30.3
25.9
-25.7
48.9
22.7
38.1
25.6
HEXANF. .
t.53
-0.05
0.99
0.49
1.80
0.23
1.26
-t.40
0.77
m MOT.
38
-2
61
21
30
16
57
-93
34
R *
.12
.70
.66
.38
.00
.09
.37
.33
.89
.NDY
-34.7
-35.1
-2.8
-9.1
13.0
-40.5
-6.8
-4.5
-11.6
PPM . r
-48.4
-72.9
-5.9
-18.4
16.5
-79.7
-13.4
-10.2
-22.4
)? 1
-0.45
-0.20
0.12
-0.47
-0.20
0.57
-0.53
0.05
-0.23
-18.75
-15.38
2.56
-23.24
-66.67
13- 18
-20.54
1.16
-7.77
3-293
-------
TABLE 21 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON ALL
^ VEHICLES BEFORE MAINTENANCE
MODE : 50 MPH
DENVER
1973 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 27 VEHICLES
N(
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
NO. OF CYL.
2
4
6
8
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 - 250
251 - 350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799
2800 - 3799
3800 - 4799
4800 - 5799
D. OF
VEH
1
3
6
12
5
0
7
3
17
7
3
8
9
6
6
13
2
I
MEAN
105.0
175.0
197.5
111.7
223.0
186.4
146.7
148.5
186.4
146.7
170.0
129.4
190.8
170.8
148.8
82.5
1C
S.
0
26
112
57
117
114
42
88
114
42
62
107
124
57
91
31
D.
.0
.0
.0
.8
.6
.6
.5
.8
.6
.5
.3
.2
.8
.9
.5
.8
C
MEAN
0.32
3-30
3.16
1.97
4.18
3.38
1.97
2.60
3.38
1.97
2.73
2.48
3.02
2.92
2.41
3.35
0
S.D.
0.00
1.25
2.26
1.60
1.36
1.84
1.69
1.91
1.84
1.69
1.42
2.35
1.74
1.74
2.09
2.05
^
MEAN
3384.5
2083.4
1079-3
927.8
1142.6
1296.1
2928.3
888.2
1296.1
2928.3
890.5
886.1
1372.2
1849.8
996.2
336.9
IOX
S.
0
1173
902
623
698
657
625
666
657
625
486
826
685
1249
718
276
D.
.0
.4
.6
.6
.5
.0
.8
.7
.0
.8
.1
.0
.1
.4
.5
.5
I
MEAN
1.00
0.63
0.90
2.21
1.24
1.13
0.80
1.81
1.13
0.80
2.57
1.12
0.90
1.78
1.65
1.75
02
S.D,
""••••
0.00
0.2]
0.15
1.13
0.81
0.6!
0.26
1.22
0.0
0.2
1.2
O.I1
0.3f
1.1'
1.27
./
1.06
ALL VEHICLES 27
EMISSION RESULTS ARE
158.1 91.1 2.73 1.86 1220.6 902.0
HC PPM HEXANE , CO MOLE % ,NOX PPM , 02 %
1.52
3-29A
-------
TABLE 21 CONT'D
nF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON ALL PHASE 1
VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE
MODE : 50 MPH
DENVER
1973 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 27 VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
NO. OF CYL.
2
1
6
8
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 - 250
251 - 350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799
2800 . 3?99
3800 . 4790
"800 - 579g
ALL VEHICLES
*
EMISSION RESULTS
1
3
6
12
5
0
7
3
17
7
3
8
9
6
6
13
2
27
ARE :
HC
MEAN S .
80.0
158.3
207.5
104.2
233-0
191.4
113.3
149.1
191.4
113.3
161.9
137.8
206.7
130.0
158.8
65.0
156.1
HC PPM
0
49
129
50
115
118
29
97
118
29
57
126
121
62
101
7
98
D.
.0
.3
.5
.2
.6
.2
.3
.7
.2
• 3
.6
.1
.7
.4
.6
.1
.7
HEXANE
CO
MEAN S.D.
0.40
3-03
3.32
1.40
3.62
2.90
1.73
2.28
2.90
1.73
2.12
2.42
2.85
2.07
2.38
1.90
2.38
0.00
1.25
2.76
0.65
0.27
1.26
1.30
1.93
1.26
1.30
1.09
2.52
1.37
1.12
2.19
0.14
1.71
, CO MOLE %
NOX
MEAN S.
1592.7
2057.3
1074.9
1029.4
1252.8
1442.3
2256.4
939.1
1442.3
2256.4
866.3
1003.8
1487.8
1553.5
1041.4
522.2
1215.9
0
940
938
776
692
686
608
752
686
608
344
1009
740
878
838
101
821
,NOX PPM ,
D.
.0
.9
.7
.5
.5
.3
.2
.6
.3
.2
.1
.5
.1
.4
.8
.4
• 3
02
02
MEAN S.D.
0.90
0.80
0.68
1.93
1.10
1.06
0.87
1.54
1.06
0.87
1.96
1.16
0.78
1.58
1.39
1.90
1.34
,
0.00
0.10
0.20
1.06
0.90
0.74
0.06
1.08
0.74
0.06
1.34
0.66
0.17
1.25
1.04
0.42
0.96
3-295
-------
TABLE 21 CONT'D
sw
1MARY OF
FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST fKUUiUUKfi, cjuiAUdi miSSIQN REDUCTIONS
MODE : 50 MPH
DENVER
1973 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
VEHICLE
MFG.
.AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL
IMPORTS
NO. OF
2
4
6
8
MOTORS
CYL.
1
3
6
12
5
0
7
3
17
TOTAL
HC
IMPR ',
25.0
16.7
-10.0
7.5
-10.0
-5.0
33.3
-0.6
SAMPLE SIZE
6IMPR
23-8
9.5
-5.1
6.7
-4.5
-2.7
22.7
-0.4
IMPR
-0.08
0.27
-0.16
0.57
0.56
0.48
0.24
0.31
27 VEHICLES
CO
$B
-25
8
-5
28
13
14
12
12
NOX
1PR IMPR $IMPR
.00
.08
.01
.96
.40
.17
.16
.12
1791.8
26.1
4.4
-101.6
-110.2
-146.2
671.9
-50.9
52.9
1.3
0.4
-11.0
-9.6
-11.3
22.9
-5.7
IMPR
0.10
-0.17
0.22
0.27
0.14
0.07
-0.07
0.27
02
JfflPfl
"
10.00
-26.32
21.07
12.15
11.25
6.33
-8.33
IDJ
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 -
251 -
250
350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA
1800 -
2800 -
3800 -
4800 -
ALL VEH
WEIGHT
2799
3799
4799
5799
rr.i .RS
7
3
8
9
6
6
13
2
ov
-5.0
33-3
8.1
-8.3
-15.8
40.8
-10.0
17.5
<*> f\
-2.7
22.7
4.8
-6.4
-8.3
23.9
-6.7
21.2
0.48
0.24
0.61
0.06
0.18
0.85
0.03
1.45
14
12
22
2
5
29
1
43
.17
.16
.20
.24
.79
.22
.12
.28
-146.2
671.9
24.3
-117.8
-115.6
296.3
-45.2
-185.2
-11.3
22.9
2.7
-13.3
-8.4
16.0
-4.5
-55.0
*» ii
0.07
-0.07
0.61
-0.03
0.12
0.20
0.25
-0.15
A ifi
6.33
-8.33
23-79
-2.97
11.21
4.57
11.95
o.:
J.78 4.7
EMISSION RESULTS ARE : HC PPM HEXANE , CO MOLE % ,NOX PPM , 02 %
3-296
-------
TABLE 21 CONT'D
DP FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON ALL PHASE 1
VEHICLES BEFORE MAINTENANCE
MODE : 30 MPH
DENVER
1973 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 27 VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
NO. OF CYL.
2
4
6
8
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 - 250
251 - 350
MORE THAN 350
IHERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799
2800 - 3799
3800 - j,799
"800 . 5?99
ALL VEHICLES
ASSIGN RESULTS
1
3
6
12
5
0
7
3
17
7
3
8
9
6
6
13
2
27
*
ARE
HC
MEAN S.D.
180.
266.
241.
156.
270.
259.
236.
184.
259.
236.
198.
171.
274.
225.
185.
125.
209.
0
7
7
3
0
3
7
1
3
7
1
7
2
0
4
0
4
: HC PPM
0.0
55.1
82.0
53.9
106.5
89.2
73.7
77.9
89.2
73.7
58.0
94.0
87.7
60.9
81.5
35.4
84.6
HEXANE
CO
MEAN S.D.
0.35
2.47
2.52
1.83
2.28
2.39
1.78
2.01
2.39
1.78
2.06
1.97
2.55
2.16
1.78
2.43
2.08
V
0.00
1.70
1.06
1.18
1.50
1.31
2.10
1.15
1.31
2.10
0.98
1.34
1.36
1.55
1.12
1.52
1.26
, CO MOLE %
NOX
MEAN S.
2787.3
1891.4
921.3
561.7
968.2
1029.3
2405.7
655.8
1029.3
2405.7
609.5
696.8
976.9
1511.8
789.6
186.9
947.0
0
874
529
380
478
406
748
454
406
748
422
503
418
1160
436
85
715
,NOX PPM ,
D.
.0
.9
.1
.7
.9
.3
.8
.7
.3
.8
.5
.3
.4
.0
.4
.7
.0
02
02
MEAN S.D.
1.00
0.90
0.83
2.53
1.64
1-31
1.07
2.05
1.31
1.07
2.72
1.46
0.87
2.18
1.84
2.55
1.75
%
0.00
0.69
0.74
1.34
1.40
1.27
0.60
1.41
1.27
0.60
1.45
1.13
0.52
1.40
1.53
0.35
1.34
3-297
-------
TABLE 21 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF FEDERAL THRgE^DEJEST PROCEDUR^RESOLTS ON ALL PHASE
MODE : 30 MPH
DENVER
1973 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 27 VEHICLES
NC
VEHICLE MFG.
.AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
NO. OF CYL.
2
4
6
8
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 - 250
251 - 350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799
2800 - 3799
3800 - 4799
4800 - 5799
). OF
VEH
1
3
6
12
5
0
7
3
17
7
3
8
9
6
6
13
2
MEAI
95
203
248
167
267
253
161
192
253
161
198
188
277
162
201
142
F
fl
.0
.3
.3
.5
.0
.6
.7
.9
.6
.7
.1
• 3
.5
.5
.2
.5
1C
S.D.
0.0
20.8
100.7
68.1
141.8
118.1
59.7
89.1
118.1
59.7
63.9
110.7
109.3
65.1
94.3
67.2
C
MEAN
0.40
1.98
2.30
1.73
2.20
2.43
1.35
1.82
2.43
1.35
1.71
1.91
2.73
1.51
1.65
2.50
0
S.D.
0.00
1.21
0.53
1.25
1.47
1.50
1.43
0.93
1.50
1.43
0.83
1.05
1.38
1.09
0.96
0.99
ME,
450
1750
1173
659
861
1015
1552
776
1015
1552
581
950
1084
978
912
363
N
AN
.5
.3
.5
.8
.8
.8
.1
.6
.8
.1
.0
.6
.4
.3
.8
.5
OX
S.D.
0.0
625.8
700.8
596.0
628.6
655.7
963.8
621.5
655.7
963-8
357-5
767.1
690.2
886.0
653-1
50.7
MEAN(
1.00
0.93
0.57
2.40
1.60
1.27
1.03
1.88
1.27
1.03
2.29
1.52
0.73
1.98
1.72
2.65
)2
S.D.
0.00
0.119
o.n
1.52
1.6J
1.15
0.15
1.51
1.15
0.15
1.T6
1.21
0.29
1,13
1.56
0.21
ALL VEHICLES 27
EMISSION RESULTS ARE
205.2 96.6 1.92 1.15 924.8 685.8
HC PPM HEXANE , CO MOLE % ,NOX PPM , 02 $
1.63
1.12
3-298
-------
TABLE 21 CONT'D
O.IUM/IBY OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST PROCEDURE EXHAUST EMISSION REDUCTIONS
SUMMAKi ur QN ^L pRAS£ 1 ygfjjQLgs AFTER MAINTENANCE
MODE : 30 MPH
DENVER
1973 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 27 VEHICLES
N(
VEHICLE MPG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
NO. OF CYL.
2
4
6
8
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 - 250
251 - 350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA HEIGHT
1800 - 2799
2800 - 3?99
3800 - ij799
"800 - 5799
). OF
VEH
1
3
6
12
5
0
7
3
17
7
3
8
9
6
6
13
2
I
IMPR
85.0
63.3
-6.7
-11.2
3.0
5.7
75.0
-8.8
5.7
75.0
0.0
-16.7
-3.3
62.5
-15.8
-17.5
1C
2IMPR
47.2
23.7
-2.8
-7.2
1.1
2.2
31.7
-4.8
2.2
31.7
0.0
-9.7
-1.2
27.8
-8.5
-14.0
IMPR
-0.05
0.48
0.22
0.10
0.08
-0.04
0.43
0.19
-0.04
0.43
0.35
0.06
-0.18
0.65
0.13
-0.07
CO
*X
-14
19
8
5
3
-1
24
9
-1
24
16
2
-7
30
7
-3
MPR
.29
.59
.61
.45
.51
.80
.30
.65
.80
.30
.97
.82
.19
.12
.13
.09
IM
2336
141
-252
-98
106
13
853
-120
13
853
28
-253
-107
533
-123
-176
N(
PR
.8
.0
.1
.2
.3
.5
.6
.9
.5
.6
.6
.7
.5
.5
.2
.6
3X
JIMPR
83.8
7.5
-27.4
-17.5
11.0
1-3
35.5
-18.4
1.3
35.5
4.7
-36.4
-11.0
35.3
-15.6
-94.5
(
IMPR
0.00
-0.03
0.27
0.13
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.17
0.04
0.03
0.44
-0.07
0.13
0.20
0.12
-0.10
32
JIMPR
0.00
-3-70
32.00
5.26
2.44
3-26
3-13
8.31
3.26
3-13
16.06
-4.58
15.38
9.16
6.28
-3.92
^ VEHICLES 27
ASSIGN RESULTS ARE
4.3
2.0 0.16 7.64 22.2 2.3 0.12 6.98
HC PPM HEXANE , CO MOLE % ,NOX PPM , 02 %
3-299
-------
TABLE 21 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON ALL PH4SE
VEHICLES BEFORE MAINTENANCE
MODE : IDLE (D)
DENVER
1973 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 27 VEHICLES
N(
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
NO. OF CYL.
2
4
6
8
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 - 250
251 - 350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799
2800 - 3799
3800 - 4799
4800 - 5799
ALL VEHICLES
). OF
VEH
1
3
6
11
0
0
1
3
17
1
3
8
9
1
5
13
2
21
MEAl
380
356
360
174
320
383
238
320
383
240
236
320
356
238
160
263
F
N
.0
.7
.0
.1
.0
.3
.5
.0
.3
.6
.7
.0
.0
.8
.0
.1
1C
S.!
0
66
126
59
0
45
124
0
45
95
150
0
101
125
42
124
D.
.0
.6
.6
.2
.0
.1
.1
.0
.1
.8
.9
.0
.1
.6
.4
.0
C
MEAN
7-70
7.20
6.72
1.84
7.20
7.10
3.61
7.20
7.10
3.16
4.01
7.20
5.88
3.83
1.75
4.28
0
S.D.
0.00
2.31
2.78
1.06
0.00
2.26
3.05
0.00
2.26
2.74
3.42
0.00
3.02
3-23
0.92
3.16
N(
MEAN
82.2
71.2
57.6
92.5
60.1
78.2
80.3
60.1
78.2
70.1
89.4
60.1
71.6
70.6
161.6
79.0
DX
S.D.
0.0
15.0
19.2
45.4
0.0
12.6
41.2
0.0
12.6
20.8
53.1
0.0
18.3
24.4
64.3
37.3
i
MEAN
0.50
1-37
0.85
3-36
1.40
1.23
2.45
1.40
1.23
3.44
1.57
1.40
2.40
1.9.5
4.00
2.22
32
S.D.
0.00
0.45
0.83
2.02
0.00
0.6?
2.10
0.00
0.61
2.28
1.5«
0,00
2,12
2.02
0.85
1.9»
EMISSION RESULTS ARE : HC PPM HEXANE , CO MOLE % ,NOX PPM , 02 %
3*300
-------
TABLE 21 CONT'D
OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON ALL PHASE 1
VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE
MODE : IDLE (D)
DENVER
1973 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 27 VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
NO. OF CYL.
2
4
6
8
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 - 250
251 - 350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 . 2799
2800 - 3?99
3800 - n79g
"800 - 5?99
ALL VEHICLES
EMISSION RESULTS
1
3
6
11
0
0
1
3
17
1
3
8
9
1
5
13
2
21
-*
ARE
HC
MEAN S.D.
225
180
215
138
205
198
163
205
198
171
156
205
197
171
82
170
.0
.0
.0
.6
.0
.3
.5
.0
• 3
.2
.7
.0
.0
.2
.5
.5
: HC PPM
0.0
17.3
55.7
43.6
0.0
27.5
58.9
0.0
27.5
48.2
69.2
0.0
56.5
48.7
3.5
55.4
HEXANE
CO
MEAN S.D.
1.40
1.03
1.42
0.97
0.30
1.19
1.17
0.30
1.19
1.47
0.90
0.30
2.02
0.97
0.38
1.13
0.00
0.92
1.07
1.02
0.00
0.93
1.01
0.00
0.93
1.31
0.62
0.00
1.31
0.70
0.09
0.97
, CO MOLE %
NOX
MEAN S.D.
18
178
164
94
123
150
117
123
150
91
140
123
118
130
83
122
,NOX
.0
.2
.1
.1
.7
.5
.5
.7
.5
.8
.2
.7
.0
.1
.9
.5
0.0
120.8
80.0
24.6
0.0
152.6
59.9
0.0
152.6
22.4
74.2
0.0
116.8
62.7
35.0
73.1
PPM , 02
02
MEAN S.D.
0.80
1.83
0.85
3.71
0.90
1.77
2.71
0.90
1.77
3.27
2.20
0.90
1.98
2.55
4.10
2.49
%
0.00
0.74
0.23
1.50
0.00
0.85
1.84
0.00
0.85
2.03
1.59
0.00
1.38
1.91
0.42
1.74
3-301
-------
TABLE 21 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST PROCEDURE EXHAUST EMISSION REDUCTIONS
bUMMAKi ur rau&iuu VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE UUNS
MODE : IDLE (D)
DENVER
1973 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 27 VEHICLES
N(
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
NO. OF CYL.
2
4
6
8
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 - 250
251 - 350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799
2800 - 3799
3800 - 4799
M800 - 5799
ALL VEHICLES
). OF
VEH
1
3
6
11
0
0
1
3
17
1
3
8
9
1
5
13
2
21
IM
155
176
115
35
115
185
75
115
185
69
80
115
159
67
77
92
H
PR
.0
.7
.0
.5
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.4
.0
.0
.0
.7
.5
.6
C
56IMPR
40.8
49.5
40.3
20.4
35.9
48.3
31.4
35.9
48.3
28.8
33.8
35.9
44.7
28.3
48.4
35.2
(
IMPR
6.30
6.17
5.30
0.86
6.90
5.91
2.44
6.90
5.91
1.69
3.10
6.90
3.86
2.86
1.36
3.15
:o
5&IMPR
81.82
85.74
78.81
46.93
95.83
83.19
67.61
95.83
83.19
53.56
77.48
95.83
65.71
74.67
78.00
73.57
IM
64
-107
-106
-1
-63
-72
-37
-63
-72
-21
-50
-63
-46
-59
77
-43
N
PR
.1
.0
.5
.5
.6
.3
.2
.6
.3
.8
.9
.6
.4
.4
.8
.5
OX
5&IMPR
78.0
-150.2
-184.9
-1.6
-105.8
-92.4
-46.3
-105.8
-92.4
-31.1
-56.9
-105.8
-64.8
-84.1
48.1
-55.0
IMPR
-0.30
-0.17
0.00
-0.35
0.50
-0.53
-0.26
0.50
-0.53
0.16
-0.63
0.50
0.12
-0.61
-0.10
-0.26
02
JWR
— •—
-60.00
-31.15
0.00
-10.2?
35.71
-13-2'
-10.58
35-71
JI3.2*
11.73
-10.13
35-71
17-50
-31.23
-2.50
.11.78
MSSION RESULTS ARE : HC PPM HEXANE , CO MOLE % ,NOX PPM , 02 *
3-302
-------
TABLE 21 CONT'D
MUUABY OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON ALL PHASE 1
SUMMAKi ui VEHICLES BEFORE MAINTENANCE
VEHICLES BEFORE MAINTENANCE
MODE : IDLE (N)
DENVER
1973 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 27 VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
NO. OF CYL.
2
1
6
8
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 - 250
251 - 350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799
2800 - 3799
3800 - 47gg
"800 - 5?99
ALL VEHICLES
*
ASSIGN RESULTS
1
3
6
12
5
0
7
3
17
7
3
8
9
6
6
13
2
27
ARE
HC
MEAN S.
335
303
316
137
467
409
331
192
409
331
190
194
467
264
194
105
264
.0 0
.3 92
-3 135
.5 79
.0 495
.3 416
.7 80
.2 132
.3 416
.7 80
.0 103
.2 161
.5 424
.2 137
.5 138
-0 7
.0 246
D.
.0
.4
.9
.3
.6
.6
.1
.8
.6
.1
.1
.1
.0
.6
.4
.1
.9
: HC PPM HEXANE
CO
MEAN S.D.
7.50
6.62
6.72
2.14
4.80
5.37
6.32
3.57
5.37
6.32
3.21
3.90
5.93
4.84
3.82
1.50
4.34
0.00
4.17
2.73
2.05
3.72
3.22
4.01
3.25
3.22
4.01
3.15
3.49
3.13
3.83
3.31
1.41
3.35
, CO MOLE %
NOX
MEAN S.D.
59
48
43
50
56
59
51
46
59
51
46
46
58
48
48
44
50
,NOX
.1
.8
.9
.6
• 3
.4
.8
• 3
.4
.8
.3
.2
.6
.8
.1
.1
.3
PPM
0.0
1.2
13.2
15.9
23.5
20.9
6.4
13.3
20.9
6.4
16.0
11.4
22.8
11.5
14.4
8.5
15.7
, 02
02
MEAN S.D.
0.50
1.17
0.83
3.43
2.16
1.77
1.10
2.66
1.77
1.10
3.80
1.66
1.32
2.88
2.09
4.30
2.26
%
0.00
0.42
0.86
2.52
1.57
1.47
0.53
2.47
1.47
0.53
2.76
1.75
0.93
2.48
2.35
1.27
2.14
3-303
-------
TABLE 21 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF FEDERAL TjjgEHODEJgT PROCEDUR^RESULTS 0N ALL PHASE
MODE : IDLE (N)
DENVER
1973 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 27 VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
VEHICLE
MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL
IMPORTS
NO. OF
2
4
6
8
MOTORS
CYL.
1
3
6
12
5
0
7
3
17
HC
MEAN S.D.
160
118
145
111
465
393
133
111
.0 0
.3 15
.0 42
.7 72
.0 635
.6 534
.3 27
.0
.3
.8
.9
.8
.6
.5
.5 52.8
C
MEAN
1.70
1.27
1.88
1.52
1.58
2.12
1.37
1.41
0
S.D.
0.00
0.71
1.55
2.18
1.54
2.43
0.76
1.51
NOX
MEAN S.D.
6.0
85.8
71.6
55.4
69.0
72.2
65.1
59.0
0.0
19-1
9.9
15.4
47.4
39.7
52.4
13-9
02
MEAN S.D.
0.90
1.33
0.67
3.62
2.56
2.0*1
1.33
2.76
0.00
0.38
0.36
2.13
1.11
1.69
038
2.25
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 -
251 -
250
350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA
1800 -
2800 -
3800 -
4800 -
ALT. VF.H'
WEIGHT
2799
3799
4799
5799
rn PC
7
3
8
9
6
6
13
2
orr
393
133
119
104
450
120
115
65
* f\ M
.6 534
• 3 27
.4 66
• 4 39
.8 561
.0 66
.0 44
.0 21
.6
.5
.9
.1
.6
.1
.8
.2
2.12
1.37
1.16
1.63
2.35
1.67
1.00
2.90
2.43
0.76
1.29
1.72
2.58
1.35
0.82
3.68
72.2
65.1
53-6
63.7
59.8
73.7
61.9
48.6
39.7
52.4
10.9
15.1
24.5
49.4
13-9
14.9
2.04
1.33
3.19
2.11
1.52
2.35
2.58
4.25
0 111
1.W
0.38
2.55
1.85
1.05
2.00
*{
2$
0.?8
2.01
187.0 288.6 1.59 1-70 63.1 27-0
EMISSION RESULTS ARE : HC PPM HEXANE , CO MOLE % ,NOX PPM
3-304
-------
TABLE 21 CONT'D
O,,UMARY OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST PROCEDURE EXHAUST EMISSION REDUCTIONS
SUMMAKi ur QN ALL pHASE 1 VEHJCLES 4^.^ MAINTENANCE
MODE : IDLE (N)
DENVER
1973 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 27 VEHICLES
N(
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
NO. OF CYL.
2
4
6
8
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 - 250
251 - 350
MORE THAN 350
^ERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799
2800 - 3799
«nn ,
JOUU - 47QQ
llftnn
^uu _ 5799
). OF
VEH
1
3
6
12
5
0
7
3
17
7
3
8
9
6
13
2
IM
175
185
171
25
2
15
198
80
15
198
70
89
16
144
79
40
I
PR
.0
.0
.3
.8
.0
.7
.3
.8
.7
• 3
.6
.8
.7
.2
.5
.0
1C
52.2
61.0
54.2
18.8
0.4
3.8
59.8
42.0
3-8
59.8
37.2
46.2
3.6
54.6
40.9
38.1
IMPR
5.80
5.35
4.83
0.62
3.22
3.25
4.95
2.16
3-25
4.95
2.04
2.27
3.58
3.17
2.82
-1.40
CO
*I
77
80
71
29
67
60
78
60
60
78
63
58
60
65
73
-93
MPR
.33
.86
.96
.04
.08
.51
.36
.58
.51
.36
.74
.26
.39
.40
.92
.33
N<
IMPR
53.1
-37.0
-27.7
-4.8
-12.7
-12.8
-13.3
-12.7
-12.8
-13.3
-7.3
-17.5
-1.2
-24.9
-13.8
-4.5
DX
56IMPR
89.8
-75.9
-63.1
-9.5
-22.5
-21.5
-25.7
-27.5
-21.5
-25.7
-15.7
-38.0
-2.0
-51.0
-28.8
-10.2
IMPR
-0.40
-0.17
0.17
-0.19
-0.40
-0.27
-0.23
-0.09
-0.27
-0.23
0.31
-0.46
-0.20
0.53
-0.48
0.05
02
5&IMPR
-80.00
-14.29
20.00
-5.58
-18.52
-15.32
-21.21
-3-53
-15-32
-21.21
8.22
-27.52
-15.19
18.50
-23.16
1.16
^ VEHICLES 2?
-#
^^ RESULTS ARE
77.0 29.2 2.76 63-43 -12.8 -25.4 -0.16 -6.89
HC PPM HEXANE , CO MOLE % ,NOX PPM , 02 %
3-305
-------
TABLE 21 CONT'D
i
SUMMARY OF FEDERAL ™gc||g"B^EfSSgggBgiSm-M ON *"•
MODE : 50 MPH
DENVER
1973 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 121 VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
NO. OF CYL.
2
1
6
8
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 - 250
251 - 350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799
2800 - 3799
3800 - 1799
1800 - 5799
ALL VEHICLES
EMISSION RESULTS
2
13
11
12
12
0
17
7
29
17
7
17
12
15
19
11
5
53
ARE
HC
MEAN S.D.
102
223
208
110
230
197
196
198
197
196
213
176
192
216
201
126
197
: HC
.5
.8
.2
.8
.1
.9
.1
.1
.9
.1
.2
.7
.7
.1
• 3
.0
.8
PPM
3.5
87-5
80.1
79.3
83.8
93.1
87.6
88.2
93.1
87.6
71.8
106.9
98.1
68.1
101.0
19.9
88.0
HEXANE
C'
MEAN
0.76
1.05
3.35
2.18
1.97
1.20
3-75
3-20
1.20
3-75
3.12
2.89
1.03
3.15
3.66
2.66
3.59
0
S.D.
0.62
2.10
1.81
2.63
2.70
2.79
3.06
2.18
2.79
3.06
2.38
1.93
2.93
2.09
2.89
1.61
2.50
, CO MOLE %
NOX
MEAN S.D.
1958.5
1007.5
1257.1
1218.1
907.7
999.3
1962.2
1026.1
999.3
1962.2
923-9
1171.5
982.7
1215.6
1290.9
801.7
1111.3
.NOX
2016
853
720
1018
137
162
1090
851
162
1090
928
712
189
931
1066
187
835
PPM ,
.8
.5
.7
.6
.0
.5
.9
.5
.5
.9
.9
.5
.7
.7
.8
.6
.6
02
02
MEAN s.D.
2.30
0.75
0.79
1.11
1.01
0.89
0.81
1.05
0.89
0.81
1.10
0.97
1.11
0.66
•1.31
0.97
%
1.M
0.23
0.53
1.03
1.05
0.90
0.38
0.89
0.90
0.38
1.05
O.W
0.95
0.99
0.20
0-9»
o.»
3-306
-------
TABLE 21 CONT'D
OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON ALL FAILED
VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE
MODE : 50 MPH
DENVER
1973 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 121 VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
VEHICLE
MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL
IMPORTS
NO. OF
2
4
6
8
MOTORS
CYL.
2
13
14
12
12
0
17
7
29
MEAN
95.0
199-2
218.9
127.1
217.9
189.4
173.6
191.4
HC
S.D.
21.
90.
122.
64.
75.
92.
102.
101.
2
5
1
0
8
7
2
1
CO
MEAN S.D.
0.75
4.23
3-69
1.93
4.10
3.52
3.60
3.29
0.49
2.38
2.54
1.19
2.27
2.43
3-05
2.15
NOX
MEAN S.D.
1319-0
893-7
1137.7
1036.6
1031.7
1130.4
1414.1
892.7
387.1
735.6
728.7
569-8
661.6
639.5
837-2
597-8
02
MEAN S.D.
1.90
0.59
0.64
1.07
1.10
0.95
0.57
0.91
1.41
0.14
0.22
0.85
1.13
0.98
0.21
0.69
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 -
251 -
250
350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA
1800 -
2800 -
3800 .
1800 _
WEIGHT
2799
3799
4799
5799
17
7
17
12
15
19
14
5
189-4
173.6
207.6
168.3
180.7
204.2
204.3
107.0
92.
102.
93.
111.
94.
105.
90.
60.
7
2
1
5
6
4
2
6
3.52
3-60
3.35
3.21
3.28
3-63
3-57
2.49
2.43
3.05
2.16
2.22
2.45
2.39
2.39
1.77
1130.4
1414.1
879-0
912.1
1136.8
1067.3
1007.4
713-4
639.5
837.2
577-8
650.8
683.0
687.6
694.8
347.5
0.95
0.57
0.87
0.96
1.01
0.81
0.66
1.36
0.98
0.21
0.66
0.75
1.03
0.63
0.24
1.07
ALL VEHICLES 53
RESULTS ARE
188.4 96.9 3-41 2.32 1037.8 657-8 0.88 0.76
HC PPM HEXANE , CO MOLE % ,NOX PPM , 02 %
3-307
-------
TABLE 21 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST PROCEDURE EXHAUST EMISSION
5UMMAKI UP rauBiuii MAINTENANCE
MODE : 50 MPH
DENVER
1973 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 121 VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
HC
IMPR $IMPR
CO
IMPR *IMPR
NOX
IMPR JIMPR
(
IMPR
»
jnn
VEHICLE MFG. """"
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
2
13
14
12
12
7.5
24.6
-10.7
13.7
12.5
7.3
11.0
-5.1
9.8
5.4
0.01
-0.18
-0.34
0.55
0.87
1.32
-4.46
-10.13
21.98
17.49
639.
113-
119.
211.
-124.
5
9
7
6
0
32.7
11.3
9.5
17.0
-13-7
0.40
0.16
0.14
0.08
-0.09
17.39
21.1)3
18.18
6.5?
-9.09
NO. OF CYL.
2
4
6
8
0
17
7
29
8.5
22.9
6.7
4.3
11.6
3.4
0.67
0.15
-0.09
16.07
3-89
-2.80
-131.
548.
133.
1
1
7
-13.1
27-9
13-0
-0.06
0.24
0.14
-7.28
29.82
13-19
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN
151 -
251 -
MORE THAN
151
250
350
350
17
7
17
12
8.5
22.9
5.6
8.3
4.3
11.6
2.6
4.7
0.67
0.15
0.08
-0.33
16.07
3.89
2.23
-11.26
-131.
548.
45.
259.
1
1
0
5
-13.1
27-9
4.9
22.1
-0.06
0.24
0.23
0.02
-7.28
29-82
20.K
1.71
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 -
2800 -
3800 -
4800 -
2799
3799
4799
5799
15
19
14
5
12.0
11.8
0.0
19.0
6.2
5.5
0.0
15.1
0.74
-0.18
0.09
0.17
18.50
-5.24
2.54
6.39
-154.
178.
283-
88.
1
3
5
3
-15-7
14.3
22.0
11.0
-0.07
0.31
0.01
-0.02
-7.80
27-15
iJ
.1.49
ALL VEHICLES 53
EMISSION RESULTS ARE
9.4
4.8 0.19 5.19 103-5
9.1
0.09
HC PPM HEXANE , CO HOLE * ,NOX PPM , 02 *
3-308
-------
TABLE 21 CONT'D
OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON ALL FAILED
VEHICLES BEFORE MAINTENANCE
MODE : 30 MPH
DENVER
1973 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 121 VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
NO. OF CYL.
2
4
6
8
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 - 250
251 - 350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799
2800 - 07nn
i / M tJ
3800 - U7Qo
i I W M
h ft
1800 - 5?99
ALL VEHICLES
EMISSION RESUIT
2
13
14
12
12
0
17
7
29
17
7
17
12
15
19
14
5
53
*
in n Tt T^
S ARE
HC
MEAN S.D.
175
328
258
232
260
256
250
277
256
250
290
260
231
296
299
175
267
: HC
.0
.8
.9
.1
.8
.2
.7
.8
.2
.7
.0
.4
.0
.6
.3
.0
.3
PPM
7.1
183.6
101.9
98.1
112.7
107.2
51.4
153.6
107.2
51.4
102.6
210.2
83.2
99.8
191.6
72.6
129-2
HEXANE
CO
MEAN S.D.
0.47
2.90
3.42
2.54
2.70
2.99
3.07
2.66
2.99
3-07
2.54
2.82
2.35
3-07
2.93
2.94
2.82
, CO Mi
0.18
2.08
1.88
1.12
2.05
2.18
1.96
1.63
2.18
1.96
1.78
1.46
1.29
2.19
1.92
1.82
1.84
OLE %
NOX
MEAN S.D.
1526.7
861.9
539.6
797.1
755.7
766.0
1349.4
620.0
766.0
1349-4
613.9
628.6
835.2
706.0
922.1
319-0
763-1
,NOX P
1782.
749.
420.
711.
410.
400.
1079-
569-
400.
1079.
662.
432.
373-
832.
661.
128.
645.
'PM , i
7
2
4
8
4
4
8
6
4
8
5
9
3
3
0
4
2
02
02
MEAN S.D.
2.65
0.85
0.60
1.26
1.32
1.05
0.79
1.12
1.05
0.79
1.21
0.99
1.15
1.21
0.60
1.46
1.05
%
2.33
0.41
0.51
1.42
1.42
1.25
0.49
1.16
1.25
0.49
1.34
0.90
1.31
1.28
0.21
1.29
1.12
3-309
-------
TABLE 21 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF FEDERAL «™™™S PROCEDORE^SULTS ON ALL tuut
MODE : 30 MPH
DENVER
1973 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 121 VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
NO. OF CYL.
2
4
6
8
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 - 250
251 - 350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799
2800 - 3799
3800 - 4799
4800 - 5799
2
13
14
12
12
0
17
7
29
17
7
17
12
15
19
14
5
HC
MEAN S.D.
122.
290.
248.
223.
229.
229-
205.
262.
229.
205.
281.
234.
211.
261.
289.
151.
5
4
6
3
7
2
0
2
2
0
8
6
1
1
6
0
38
152
104
101
108
104
57
135
104
57
92
180
96
91
157
89
.9
.4
.6
.9
.0
.2
.8
.3
.2
.8
.8
.6
.9
.0
.6
.7
CO
MEAN S.D.
0.45
2.90
3.26
2.66
2.50
2.52
3.06
2.83
2.52
3.06
2.85
2.80
2.21
3.00
2.96
2.94
0.07
2.07
1.79
1.13
1.78
1.63
1.88
1.81
1.63
1.88
2.20
1.15
1.38
1.90
1.95
1.58
NOX
MEAN S.D.
655.3
1008.4
768.9
742.7
676.2
836.8
986.6
726.9
836.8
986.6
754.9
687.2
863.8
824.3
847.2
346.6
289.6
631.5
594.9
417.0
463.7
509-8
686.8
506.4
509-8
686.8
455.2
590.4
527-9
558.8
547-1
108.1
02
MEAN S.I),
2.45
0.70
0.48
1.14
1.42
1.12
0.54
0.98
1.12
0.54
0.98
0.98
1.21
0.91
0.63
1.42
2,05
O.JI
0.12
1.13
1.59
1.W
0,25
0.9&
1.W
0.25
1.08
0.95
0.9?
0.3'
1.32
ALL VEHICLES 53
EMISSION RESULTS ARE
244.1 118.5 2.76 1.74 796.5 529-7
: HC PPM HEXANE , CO MOLE % ,NOX PPM , 02 %
3-310
0.9T
!.0f
-------
TABLE 21 CONT'D
nF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST PROCEDURE EXHAUST EMISSION REDUCTIONS
ur re, FAJLED VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE
MODE : 30 MPH
DENVER
1973 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 121 VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
VEHICLE
MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL
IMPORTS
NO. OF
2
4
6
8
MOTORS
CYL.
2
13
14
12
12
0
17
7
29
HC
IMPR /SIMPR
52.5
38.5
10.4
8.8
31.1
26.9
45.7
15.5
30.0
11.7
4.0
3.8
11.9
10.5
18.2
5.6
CO
TMPR 1TMPR
Jmi LL l\ yPXl It II
0.02
-0.00
0.16
-0.12
0.20
0.48
0.01
-0.17
5.26
-0.13
4.59
-4.59
7-47
15.95
0.47
-6.49
NOX
IMPR JIMPR
871.5
-146.5
-229.3
54.4
79.5
-70.8
362.7
-106.9
57
-17
-42
6
10
-9
26
-17
.1
.0
.5
.8
.5
.2
.9
.2
02
IMPR JIMPR
0.20
0.15
0.12
0.12
-0.09
-0.07
0.24
0.13
7.55
18.02
20.24
9-27
-6.92
-6.70
30.91
12.04
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 -
251 -
250
350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA
1800 -
2800 -
3800 -
1800 -
WEIGHT
2799
5799
^ VEHICLES
ASSIGN
RESULTS
17
7
17
12
15
19
14
5
53
*
ARE
26.9
45.7
8.2
25.8
19-9
35.5
9.6
24.0
23.2
: HC PPM
10.5
18.2
2.8
9.9
8.6
12.0
3.2
13.7
8.7
HEXANE .
0.48
0.01
15.95
0.47
-0.31 -12.30
0.03
0.15
0.07
-0.03
0.00
0.06
, CO MOLE
0.89
6.29
2.40
-0.98
0.00
2.16
% ,NOX
-70.8
362.7
-141.0
-58.6
-28.5
-118.3
74.9
-27.6
-33-3
PPM ,
-9
26
-23
-9
-3
-16
8
-8
-4
02 %
.2
.9
.0
.3
.4
.8
.1
.6
.4
-0.07
0.24
0.22
0.01
-0.07
0.29
-0.03
0.04
0.08
-6.70
30.91
18.54
0.84
-5.81
24.45
-4.76
2.74
7.89
3-311
-------
TABLE 21 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF FEDERAL
ON ALL FAILED
MODE : IDLE (D)
DENVER
1973 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 121 VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
NO. OF CYL.
2
4
6
8
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 - 250
251 - 350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799
2800 - 3799
3800 - 4799
4800 - 5799
2
12
13
10
0
0
2
7
28
2
7
17
11
2
17
13
5
HC
MEAN S.D.
370.
344.
440.
453-
227.
365.
432.
227.
365.
413.
462.
227.
404.
367.
606.
0
6
8
0
5
7
9
5
7
5
7
5
4
3
0
14
77
238
321
130
39
247
130
39
208
305
130
192
133
406
.1
.6
.8
.9
.8
.8
.0
.8
.8
.6
• 7
.8
.7
.1
.8
CO
MEAN S.D.
7-90
5.73
7.62
4.63
4.80
6.24
6.31
4.80
6.24
6.26
6.38
4.80
6.40
6.26
6.02
0.28
2.99
1.48
2.26
3.39
2.70
2.51
3.39
2.70
2.37
2.84
3.39
2.36
2.96
2.17
NOX
MEAN S.D.
53.1
85.6
68.3
50.9
72.6
95.8
61.2
72.6
95.8
53.7
72.9
72.6
64.8
82.5
42.2
41.1
79.2
67.1
21.5
17.7
88.8
55.0
17.7
88.8
31.0
79-8
17-7
61.2
75.1
21.6
02
MEAN S.D,
1.90
1.35
0.67
2.30
0.80
0.91
1.56
0.80
0.91
1.70
1.35
0.80
1.52
1.08
2.02
""""
1.98
0.62
0.5?
2.55
0.85
0.55
i.n
0.85
0.55
1.82
1.8
0.85
1,58
1.*
2.28
ALL VEHICLES 37
EMISSION RESULTS ARE
409.1 221.7 6.21 2.53 68.4 61-5
1.40
HC PPM HEXANE , CO MOLE % ,NOX PPM ,
02
3-312
-------
TABLE 21 CONT'D
MUUARY (IP FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON ALL FAILED
SUMMAKI ur WRHTfTI.RS AFTER MAINTENANCE
VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE
MODE : IDLE (D)
DENVER
1973 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 121 VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
NO. OF CYL.
2
1
6
8
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
!51 - 250
251 - 350
"ORE THAN 350
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799
2800 . 379g
3800 . 4799
llflnn
^°uu > 5799
2
12
13
10
0
0
2
7
28
2
7
17
11
2
17
13
5
MEAN
187
172
324
447
137
231
330
137
231
290
391
137
270
274
541
.5
.9
.6
.0
.5
.4
.2
.5
.4
.3
.8
.5
.3
.2
.0
HC
S.
53
33
257
463
95
64
335
95
64
252
442
95
192
253
601
D.
.0
.6
.4
.4
.5
.3
.6
.5
.3
.2
.0
.5
.6
.1
.6
CO
MEAN S.D.
1.02
1.18
2.01
1.27
0.35
1.94
1.46
0.35
1.94
1.62
1.20
0.35
2.04
1.08
1.12
0.53
0.66
1.56
1.00
0.07
1.19
1.16
0.07
1.19
1.34
0.80
0.07
1.33
0.67
1.06
NOX
MEAN S.D.
79.7
116.3
115.0
158.6
205.2
126.2
119.4
205.2
126.2
122.6
114.4
205.2
103-7
157.2
84.3
87-3
68.8
67-7
144.4
115.2
94.6
94.2
115.2
94.6
107.0
74.7
115.2
64.9
127.6
20.2
02
MEAN S.D.
2.95
1.32
1.05
2.82
0.65
0.83
2.02
0.65
0.83
1.89
2.21
0.65
1.44
1.48
3.72
3-04
0.83
1.08
2.27
0.35
0.73
1.79
0.35
0.73
1.72
1.96
0.35
1.42
1.52
1.96
VEHICLES 37
RESULTS ARE
301.1 297.5 1.49 1.16 125.3 94.3 1.72 1.67
: HC PPM HEXANE , CO MOLE % ,NOX PPM , 02 %
3-313
-------
TABLE 21 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST PROCEDURE EXHAUST EMISSION REDUCTIONS
bUMMAKi ur r&uc, ^ ^ ^^ ^fUCLES AFTER MAINTENANCE UUNS
MODE : IDLE (D)
DENVER
1973 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 121 VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
VEHICLE
MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL
IMPORTS
NO. OF
2
4
6
8
MOTORS
CYL.
2
12
13
10
0
0
2
7
28
HC
IMPR JIMPR
182.
171.
116.
6.
90.
134.
102.
5
7
2
0
0
3
7
49.3
49.8
26.4
1.3
39.6
36.7
23.7
CO
IMPR *IMPR
6.87
4.55
5.61
3.36
4.45
4.30
4.85
87.03
79-38
73.64
72.60
92.71
68.91
76.93
NOX
IMPR JIMPR
-26.6
-30.7
-46.7
-107.7
-132.6
-30.4
-58.2
-50.1
-35.9
-68.4
-211.6
-182.5
-31.8
-95.0
IMPR
-1.05
0.03
-0.38
-0.52
0.15
0.09
-0.16
02
JIHPB
-55.26
2A1
-5W
-22.61
18.15
9J
-29-25
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 - 250
251 - 350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA
1800 -
2800 -
3800 -
4800 -
WEIGHT
2799
3799
4799
5799
2
7
17
11
2
17
13
5
90.
134.
123.
70.
90.
134.
93-
65.
0
3
2
9
0
1
1
0
39.6
36.7
29.8
15.3
39.6
33.2
25.3
10.7
4.45
4.30
4.64
5.18
4.45
4.37
5.17
4.90
92.71
68.91
74.12
81.20
92.71
68.19
82.67
81.40
-132.6
-30.4
-68.9
-41.5
-132.6
-38.8
-74.7
-42.1
-182.5
-31.8
-128.4
-56.9
-182.5
-59-9
-90.6
-99.8
0.15
0.09
-0.19
-0.86
0.15
0.08
-0.39
-1.70
18.75
9-38
-11.42
-64.19
18.75
5.H
-36.17
Jl.1l)
ALL VEHICLES 37 108.0 26.4 4.73 76.07 -56.9 -83-2 -0-32
EMISSION RESULTS ARE : HC PPM HEXANE , CO MOLE % ,NOX PPM , 02 %
3-314
-------
TABLE 21 CONT'D
MUUAHY OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON ALL FAILED
SUMMAHI ur ru VRHTfM.RS RRFORR MAINTENANCE
VEHICLES BEFORE MAINTENANCE
MODE : IDLE (N)
DENVER
1973 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 121 VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
NO. OF CYL.
2
4
6
8
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
!51 - 250
251 - 350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 . 2799
2800 - 3?99
3800 . i|?99
iiftnn
H°uo _ 5799
2
13
14
12
12
0
17
7
29
17
7
17
12
15
19
14
5
MEAN
340
455
478
750
664
640
367
579
640
367
490
704
658
436
555
862
.0
.0
.2
.0
.2
.6
.9
.1
.6
.9
.9
.2
.7
.6
.4
.0
HC
S.
7
469
366
572
412
525
119
457
525
119
320
595
553
234
501
573
D.
.1
• 3
.4
.0
.3
.8
.9
.7
.8
.9
.3
.8
.5
.6
.5
.0
CO
MEAN S.D.
7-90
5.85
7.74
5.45
5.85
6.24
5.94
6.48
6.24
5.94
6.55
6.38
5.81
6.70
6.55
5.92
0.57
3.05
1.74
3.43
3.31
3.24
2.81
2.87
3.24
2.81
2.82
3.08
3.20
2.76
3-04
3.13
NOX
MEAN S.D.
40.6
78.0
42.2
43-3
42.6
47.0
49.4
54.2
47.0
49.4
41.4
72.3
47.0
42.4
75.6
29.3
26.2
106.4
14.0
25.3
20.5
19-6
15.8
74.4
19-6
15.8
18.9
113.8
20.9
12.6
104.1
14.2
02
MEAN S.D.
2.05
1.34
0.71
2.19
1.70
1.35
0.90
1.68
1.35
0.90
1.72
1.62
1.49
1.40
1.24
2.36
2.19
0.64
0.61
2.64
1.62
1.47
0.54
1.85
1.47
0.54
1.99
1.73
1.52
1.67
1.42
2.37
ALL VEHICLES 53
.*
RESULTS ARE
570.9 454.6 6^.33 2.94 51.2 56.0 1.47 1.62
: HC PPM HEXANE , CO MOLE % ,NOX PPM , 02 %
3-315
-------
TABLE 21 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON ALL
SUMMAKI ur rautniu, VEHICLES AFfER MAiNTENANCE
MODE : IDLE (N)
DENVER
1973 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 121 VEHICLES
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
NO. OF CYL.
2
4
6
8
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 - 250
251 - 350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799
2800 - 3799
3800 - 4799
4800 - 5799
NO. OF
VEH
2
13
14
12
12
0
17
7
29
17
7
17
12
15
19
14
5
MEAN
215.0
220.4
233.6
562.1
587.5
468.5
182.1
383.4
468.5
182.1
321.8
470.8
497.0
225.0
360.7
716.0
HC
S.D.
77-8
314.2
227.0
733.5
594.5
530.6
75.4
545.1
530.6
75.4
484.5
633.1
559.6
202.7
562.1
837.4
CO
MEAN
1
1
1
1
2
2
1
1
2
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
.05
.50
.93
.93
.40
.24
.59
.77
.24
.59
.84
.68
.33
.96
.59
.25
S.D.
0.92
0.91
1.72
1.88
1.67
1.97
0.76
1.43
1.97
0.76
1.59
1.21
2.04
1.51
0.90
1.56
MEAN
34.1
68.2
60.6
105.7
51.9
60.6
64.5
76.2
60.6
64.5
86.2
62.1
60.7
59.1
98.3
56.6
NOX
S.D
39-
18.
12.
103-
18.
22.
30.
69.
22.
30.
88.
24.
23.
19-
95.
29-
.
7
9
5
6
2
3
5
8
3
5
6
2
9
6
5
7
MEAN
3.65
1.32
1.06
2.62
2.02
1.61
0.77
2.1*
1.61
0.77
1.85
2.56
1.7*
1.28
1.59
4.42
02
U
•••
3.8?
0.51
US
3.02
Ui
1.61
O.fi
2.35
1.61
o.«
2.21
2.0
1,»
1.55
2.03
At
2.83
ALL VEHICLES 53
EMISSION RESULTS ARE
384.2 505.1 1.90 1.55 69-7 54.2 U*
: HC PPM HEXANE , CO MOLE % ,NOX PPM , 02 %
3-316
-------
TABLE 21 CONT'D
FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST PROCEDURE EXHAUST EMISSION REDUCTIONS
ro FAJLED VEHJCLES AFTER MAINTENANCE
MODE : IDLE (N)
DENVER
1973 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 121 VEHICLES
N(
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
NO. OF CYL.
2
4
6
8
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 - 250
251 - 350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799
2800 . 379g
3800 . 4799
1800 - 5?99
ALL VEHICLES
D. OF
VEH
2
13
14
12
12
0
17
7
29
17
7
17
12
15
19
5
53
IM
125
234
244
187
76
172
185
195
172
185
169
233
161
211
194
146
186
H
PR
.0
.6
.6
.9
.7
.1
.7
.7
.1
.7
.1
• 3
.7
.6
.6
.0
.8
1C
*IMPR
36.8
51.6
51.2
25.1
11.5
26.9
50.5
33-8
26.9
50.5
34.5
33.1
24.5
48.5
35.0
16.9
32.7
(
IMPR
6.85
4.34
5.81
3.52
3.45
4.00
4.36
4.71
4.00
4.36
4.71
4.70
3.48
4.74
4.96
4.67
4.43
:o
JIMPR
86.71
74.28
75.05
64.59
58.95
64.11
73.32
72.62
64.11
73.32
71.95
73.60
59-90
70.78
75.74
78.82
70.02
N
IMPR
6.5
9.8
-18.4
-62.3
-9.4
-13.7
-15.2
-22.0
-13.7
-15.2
-44.8
10.2
-13-7
-16.7
-22.7
-27.3
-18.4
fOX
JIMF
16.
12.
-43.
-143.
-22.
-29-
-30.
-40.
-29-
-30.
-108.
14.
-29.
-39.
-30.
-93.
-36.
>R
0
6
6
9
0
1
7
7
1
7
2
1
1
4
1
4
0
IMPR
-1.60
0.02
-0.36
-0.42
-0.32
-0.25
0.13
-0.46
-0.25
0.13
-0.13
-0.93
-0.25
0.12
-0.36
-2.06
-0.32
02
5JIMPR
-78.05
1.72
-50.51
-19.39
-18.63
-18.70
14.29
-27.46
-18.70
14.29
-7-51
-57.44
-16.52
8.27
-28.90
-87.29
-21.51
RESULTS ARE : HC PPM HEXANE , CO MOLE % ,NOX PPM , 02 %
3-317
-------
TABLE 21 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON PHASF i
bUMMAKi ur rc-^ASSED VEHICLES BEFORE MAINTENANCE A6tl '
MODE : 50 MPH
DENVER
1972 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 25 VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
NO. OF CYL.
2
4
6
8
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 - 250
251 - 350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799
2800 - 3799
3800 - 4799
4800 - 5799
ALL VEHICLES
EMISSION RESULTS
0
1
5
6
2
0
3
1
10
3
1
4
6
4
4
5
1
14
ARE
HC
MEAN S.D.
180
193
124
157
151
195
155
151
195
156
155
162
143
184
60
157
: HC
.0
.0
.2
.5
.7
.0
.5
.7
.0
• 3
.0
.5
.7
.0
.0
.5
PP*
0.0
122.8
47.6
95.5
68.3
0.0
96.2
68.3
0.0
42.3
124.9
59.8
30.9
129.2
0.0
85.1
4 HEXANE
CO
MEAN S.D.
2.20
0.98
1.94
3.85
3.83
0.50
1.44
3.83
0.50
1.86
1.17
t
3.00
1.37
1.43
1.80
1.89
: . co M
0.00
0.54
1.32
5.02
3.55
0.00
0.86
3.55
0.00
1.16
0.53
3.34
0.65
1.14
0.00
1.90
OLE I
NOX
MEAN S.D.
1766
2712
1348
927
805
4081
1877
805
4081
1496
2132
1624
1704
2197
972
1805
.NOX
.9
.6
.9
.2
.8
.4
.9
.8
.4
.3
.3
.7
.7
.4
.6
.5
I
0.0
1046.7
640.2
659.7
511.6
0.0
747.1
511.6
0.0
363-9
855.0
1690.2
144.4
936.8
0.0
1029.4
>PM , 02
02
MEAN S.D.
0.80
1.16
2.52
1.35
2.20
1.10
1.67
2.20
1.10
1.60
1.72
1.92
1.77
1.58
1.70
1.71
$
*""
0.00
0.45
1.6]
1,48
1.81
0.00
1.33
1.81
0.00
1.73
1J
1.58
1.65
1.3«
o.oo
0
3-318
-------
TABLE 21 CONT'D
OHMMARY OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON PHASE 1
SUMMHHI u PASSED VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE
MODE : 50 MPH
DENVER
1972 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 25 VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
NO. OF CYL.
2
4
6
8
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 - 250
251 - 350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799
2800 - 0700
i f M y
3800 - i,799
li «
"800 . 5?99
0
1
5
6
2
0
3
1
10
3
1
4
6
4
4
5
1
HC
MEAN S.D.
185
131
132
157
128
195
137
128
195
187
103
145
180
118
60
.0
.0
.5
.5
.3
.0
.0
.3
.0
.5
.3
.0
.0
.0
.0
0.0
52.5
69.1
81.3
76.5
0.0
57.4
76.5
0.0
38.0
40.8
70.8
34.9
52.2
0.0
CO
MEAN S.D.
2.80
1.60
2.15
3-47
3.20
1 .00
2.00
3.20
1.00
2.36
1.77
2.65
1.94
1.92
2.70
0.00
0.55
1.06
4.42
3.16
0.00
0.88
3.16
0.00
1.12
0.69
2.81
0.83
1.05
0.00
NOX
MEAN S.
1468.3
2120.3
1213-2
2185.4
1637.8
3384.5
1542.2
1637.8
3384.5
1431.0
1616.4
2074.5
1580.3
1766.9
266.2
0
867
729
2540
2031
0
632
2031
0
247
816
1874
129
645
0
D.
.0
.5
.2
.5
.4
.0
.6
.4
.0
.6
.7
.5
• 3
.1
.0
02
MEAN S.D.
1.10
0.92
2.32
1.00
1.60
0.60
1.62
1.60
0.60
0.80
2.17
1.35
0.85
1.78
3-90
0.00
0.28
1.92
0.71
1.15
0.00
1.56
1.15
0.00
0.26
1.86
1.07
0.19
1.88
0.00
ALL VEHICLES
14
139.3 58.8 2.19 1.56 1694.3 1072.5 1.54 1.40
RESULTS ARE : HC PPM HEXANE , CO MOLE % ,NOX PPM , 02 %
3-319
-------
TABLE 21 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST PROCEDURE EXHAUST EMISSION
;>u i ON PHASE 1 PASSED VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE
MODE : 50 MPH
DENVER
1972 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 25 VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
VEHICLE
MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL
IMPORTS
NO. OF
2
4
6
8
MOTORS
CYL.
0
1
5
6
2
0
3
1
10
HC
IMPR JIMPR
-5.0
62.0
-8.3
0.0
23-3
0.0
18.5
-2.8
32.1
-6.7
0.0
15.4
0.0
11.9
IMPR
-0.60
-0.62
-0.21
0.38
0.63
-0.50
-0.56
CO
JIMPR
-27.27
-63.27
-10.73
9.74
16.52
-100.00
-38.75
NOX
IMPR JIMPR
298
592
135
-1258
-832
696
335
.6
.3
.6
.3
.0
.8
.7
16.9
21.8
10.1
-135.7
-103-2
17.1
17.9
IMPR
-0.30
0.24
0.20
0.35
0.60
0.50
0.05
02
ftfl
-•• ..
-31.50
20.65
7,95
25.93
21.27
15.15
2.95
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 -
251 -
250
350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA
1800 -
2800 -
3800 -
4800 -
WEIGHT
2799
3799
4799
5799
ALL VEHICLES
3
1
4
6
4
4
5
1
14
23.3
0.0
-31.3
51.7
17.5
-36.2
66.0
0.0
18.2
15.4
0.0
-20.0
33.3
10.8
-25.2
35.9
0.0
11.6
0.63
-0.50
-0.50
-0.60
0.35
-0.56
-0.49
-0.90
-0.30
16.52
-100.00
-26.85
-51.43
11.67
-40.91
-34.27
-50.00
-1^.88
-832
696
65
515
-449
124
430
706
111
.0
.8
.3
.9
.8
.4
.5
.4
.2
-103-2
17-1
4.4
24.2
-27-7
7-3
19-6
72.6
6.2
0.60
0.50
0.80
-0.15
0.57
0.92
-0.20
-2.20
0.20
27.2?
«.«
50.00
-26.2!
29-81
52.11
-12.tf
-129."
11.*
EMISSION RESULTS ARE : HC PPM HEXANE , CO MOLE % ,NOX PPM , 02 %
3-320
-------
TABLE 21 CONT'D
OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON PHASE 1
u PASSED VEHICLES BEFORE MAINTENANCE
MODE : 30 MPH
DENVER
1972 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 25 VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
VEHICLE
MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL
IMPORTS
NO. OF
2
4
6
8
MOTORS
CYL.
0
1
5
6
2
0
3
1
10
HC
MEAN S.D.
250
206
204
210
206
340
196
.0
.0
.2
.0
.7
.0
.5
0.0
93.8
70.5
42.4
30.6
0.0
69.2
CO
MEAN S.D.
0.70
1.20
2.42
2.30
2.43
1.80
1.67
0.00
0.47
1.33
0.14
0.25
0.00
1.25
NOX
MEAN S.D.
778.1
1647.6
886.2
1025.2
864.3
2190.0
1160.1
0.0
600.0
533-5
450.7
423.3
0.0
596.8
02
MEAN S.D.
1.30
1.10
2.93
1.35
2.87
0.70
1.78
0.00
0.57
2.14
1.34
2.79
0.00
1.35
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 -
251 -
250
350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA
1800 -
2800 -
3800 -
li ft
1800 -
WEIGHT
2799
3799
4799
5799
3
1
4
6
4
4
5
1
206
340
235
170
240
200
210
115
.7
.0
.0
.8
.0
.0
.0
.0
30.6
0.0
70.5
60.4
71.2
53.5
81.9
0.0
2.43
1.80
2.01
1.45
2.27
1.09
1.94
2.70
0.25
0.00
1.87
0.74
0.38
1.02
1.43
0.00
864.3
2190.0
962.6
1291.7
1195.7
1190.0
1296.5
358.3
423-3
0.0
518.2
654.3
747.5
374.1
715.3
0.0
2.87
0.70
1.75
1.80
2.32
2.10
1.54
1.70
2.79
0.00
1.60
1.33
2.53
1.38
1.59
0.00
ALL VEHICLES 14
EMISSION RESULTS ARE
208.9 70.0 1.85 1.09 1170.3 613.1 1.94 1.68
*
HC PPM HEXANE , CO MOLE % ,NOX PPM , 02 %
3-321
-------
TABLE 21 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON PHASP
bUMMAKi ur rc R MINTEA AbE
MODE : 30 MPH
DENVER
1972 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 25 VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
NO. OF CYL.
2
4
6
8
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 - 250
251 - 350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799
2800 - 3799
3800 - 4799
4800 - 5799
0
1
5
6
2
0
3
1
10
3
1
4
6
4
4
5
1
HC
MEAN S.D.
265
184
207
215
193
320
196
193
320
266
149
225
228
191
90
.0
.0
.5
.0
.3
.0
.0
• 3
.0
.2
.2
.0
.7
.0
.0
0.0
82.0
93.9
21.2
40.4
0.0
81.5
40.4
0.0
74.1
45.7
71.4
52.3
94.8
0.0
CO
MEAN S.D.
1.30
2.02
2.35
2.25
2.13
3.40
2.02
2.13
3.40
1.97
2.05
2.45
0.92
2.68
3.10
0.00
1.30
1.52
1.34
0.97
0.00
1.39
0.97
0.00
1.94
1.11
1.01
0.50
1.47
0.00
NOX
MEAN S.D.
1493
1270
793
1416
1128
1791
1026
1128
1791
1144
948
1294
1257
1014
164
.2
.9
.7
.7
.8
.8
.5
.8
.8
.0
.2
.5
.7
.1
.2
0.0
492.5
411.8
917.6
818.4
0.0
453.3
818.4
0.0
348.1
528.0
745.9
283.8
403-1
0.0
02
MEAN S.D.
1.20
0.91
3.00
1.05
2.50
0.60
1.79
2.50
0.60
1.02
2.30
2.02
1.17
1.82
11.10
»••
0.00
0.12
2.31
O.M
2,55
0,00
1.0
2.55
0.00
o.«
2.05
2.25
0.25
2.1&
.A
o.on
ALL VEHICLES
14
204.3 77.2 2.14 1.27 1103.1 535.2 1-1
EMISSION RESULTS ARE : HC PPM HEXANE , CO MOLE % ,NOX PPM , 02
3-322
-------
. TABLE 21 CONT'D
O,,UMARY OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST PROCEDURE EXHAUST EMISSION REDUCTIONS
SUMMARI ur r«/ ^^ ^ PASSED VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE
MODE : 30 MPH
DENVER
1972 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 25 VEHICLES
NO
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL
IMPORTS
HO. OF
2
1
6
8
MOTORS
CYL.
. OF
VEH
0
1
5
6
2
0
3
1
10
HC
IMPR £EMPR
-15.0
22.0
-3.3
-5.0
13.3
20.0
0.5
-6.0
10.7
-1.6
-2.4
6.5
5.9
0.3
IMPR
-0.60
-0.82
0.07
0.05
0.30
-1.60
-0.34
CO
JIMPR
-85.71
-68.33
3-09
2.17
12.33
-88.89
-20.60
NOX
IMPR JIMPR
-715.1
376.7
92.
-391.
-264.
398.
133.
,5
6
5
2
5
-91.9
22.9
10.4
-38.2
-30.6
18.2
11.5
IMPR
0.10
0.16
-0.07
0.30
0.37
0.10
-0.01
02
7.69
14.55
-2.27
22.22
12.79
14.29
-0.56
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 -
251 -
250
350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA
1800 .
2800 -
3800 _
1800 .
WEIGHT
2799
3799
4799
5799
3
1
4
6
4
4
5
1
^VEHICLES n,
ASSIGN
RESULTS
ARE
13.3
20.0
-31.3
21.7
15.0
-28.7
19.0
25.0
4.6
: HC PPM
6.5
5.9
-13-3
12.7
6.3
-14.4
9.0
21.7
2.2
HEXANE .
0.30
-1.60
0.04
-0.60
-0.18
0.16
-0.74
-0.40
-0.30
co MOT:
12.33
-88.89
1.86
-41.38
-7.69
14.94
-38.14
-14.81
-16.05
E * .NDY
-264.
398.
-181.
343.
-98.
-67.
282.
194.
67.
PPM
5
2
4
5
8
7
4
2
2
. C.
-30.6
18.2
-18.8
26.6
-8.3
-5.7
21.8
54.2
5.7
i? *
0.37
0.10
0.73
-0.50
0.30
0.93
-0.28
-2.40
0.08
12.79
14.29
41.43
-27.78
12.90
44.05
-18.18
-141.18
4.06
3-323
-------
TABLE 21 CONT'D
i
SUMMARY OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON PHASP 1
bunnAiu ur rc VEHICLES BEFORE MAINTENANCE HJU>E 1
MODE : IDLE (D)
DENVER
1972 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 25 VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
VEHICLE
MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL
IMPORTS
NO. OF
2
4
6
8
MOTORS
CYL.
0
1
5
5
0
0
0
1
10
HC
MEAN S.D.
180
247
289
340
252
.0 0
.0 91
.0 174
.0 0
.0 132
.0
.4
.1
.0
.9
CO
MEAN S.D.
2.00
3.48
4.58
3.70
3.86
0.00
1.83
1.81
0.00
1.92
NOX
MEAN S.D.
113.6
139.7
67.2
161.6
98.6
0.0
37.9
32.4
0.0
46.7
02
MEAN S.D.
1.90
0.88
2.20
0.50
1.68
O.M
O.I?
U5
0.00
1.18
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 -
251
250
350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA
1800 -
2800 -
3800 -
4800 -
WEIGHT
2799
3799
4799
5799
0
1
4
6
1
4
5
1
340
315
210
340
221
298
145
.0 0
.0 187
.0 74
.0 0
.2 37
.0 179
.0 0
.0
.0
.4
.0
.1
.6
.0
3.70
3.60
4.03
3-70
2.93
4.44
4.70
0.00
2.19
1.91
0.00
1.02
2.46
0.00
161.6
92.1
103.0
161.6
118.7
94.3
40.1
0.0
28.7
58.0
0.0
26.0
55-7
0.0
0.50
1.85
1.57
0.50
2.00
1.38
1.90
o.oo
1.11
1.13
o.oo
1.25
1.31
o.oo
ALL VEHICLES 11
EMISSION RESULTS ARE
260.0 128.9 3.85 1.82 104.4 48.2
HC PPM HEXANE , CO MOLE % ,NOX PPM , 02
3-324
-------
TABLE 21 CONT'D
GIIMMARY OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON PHASE 1
SUMMAKi wr pASSED VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE
MODE : IDLE (D)
DENVER
1972 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 25 VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
VEHICLE MFG.
AHER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
NO. OF CYL.
2
4
6
8
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 - 250
251 - 350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799
2800 . 3700
i / wy
3800 - ij799
h n
1800 . 5?99
0
1
5
5
0
0
0
1
10
0
1
4
6
1
4
5
1
HC
MEAN S.D.
235
148
209
330
169
330
258
109
330
195
157
125
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.7
.2
.0
.0
.0
.0
0.
109.
125.
0.
105.
0.
113.
38.
0.
28.
151.
0.
0
6
2
0
1
0
2
0
0
6
3
0
CO
MEAN S.D.
4.60
1.38
2.47
3-00
2.08
3.00
3.09
1.42
3.00
1.86
1.98
3-50
0.00
1.10
2.57
0.00
2.11
0.00
2.97
1.17
0.00
1.92
2.58
0.00
NOX
MEAN S.D.
71.1
204.2
80.1
164.2
132.8
164.2
81.9
166.8
164.2
119.4
162.6
38.1
0.0
98.0
32.2
0.0
97.0
0.0
24.2
114.6
0.0
92.9
105.7
0.0
02
MEAN S.D.
1.50
2.08
3.52
0.60
2.89
0.60
2.12
3-40
0.60
2.25
3-04
4.70
0.00
1.67
2.22
0.00
1.91
0.00
1.73
2.00
0.00
1.58
2.25
0.00
ALL VEHICLES
11 183.6 110.9 2.17 2.02 135-7 92.5 2.68 1.94
RESULTS ARE : HC PPM HEXANE , CO MOLE % ,NOX PPM , 02
3-325
-------
TABLE 21 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST PROCEDURE EXHAUST EMISSION
SUMMAHI ur rc^Diu VEHICLES ^m MAINTENANCE
MODE : IDLE (D)
DENVER
1972 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 25 VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL
IMPORTS
NO. OF
2
4
6
8
MOTORS
CYL.
0
1
5
5
0
0
0
1
10
HC
IMPR JIMPR
-55
99
80
10
83
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
-30.6
40.1
27.7
2.9
32.9
CO
IMPR 5&IMPR
-2.60 -130.00
2.10
2.11
0.70
1.78
60.34
46.07
18.92
45.98
NOX
IMPR £EMPR
42
-64
-12
-2
-34
.5
.5
.9
.5
.2
37.4
-46.1
-19.3
-1.6
-34.7
02
IMPR JIHPJ
0.10 21.05
-1 .20 -136.J
-1.32 -60.00
-0.10 -20.00
-1.21 -72.02
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 -
251 -
250
350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA
1800 -
2800 -
3800 -
4800 -
WEIGHT
2799
3799
4799
5799
ALL VEHICLES
0
1
4
6
1
4
5
1
11
10
56
100
10
26
141
20
76
.0
.3
.8
.0
.2
.0
.0
.4
2.9
17.9
48.0
2.9
11.9
47.3
13.8
2Q.4
0.70
0.51
2.62
0.70
1.06
2.46
1.20
1.68
18.92
14.24
64.88
18.92
36.32
55.41
25.53
43. fi?
-2
10
-63
-2
-0
-68
2
-31
.5
.2
.8
.5
.7
.3
.0
.3
-1.6
11.1
-61.9
-1.6
-0.6
-72.4
5.0
-30.0
-0.10 -20-00
-0.28 -1*.*
_i 83 -M02
i • v j
-0.10 -20-00
-0.25 -«•»
-2.80 -HI*
-1.11 -*>•*
EMISSION RESULTS ARE : HC PPM HEXANE , CO MOLE % ,NOX PPM , 02 %
3-326
-------
TABLE 21 CONT'D
OTIMMARY OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON PHASE 1
Surinam v, PASSED VEHICLES BEFORE MAINTENANCE
MODE : IDLE (N)
DENVER
1972 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 25 VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
VEHICLE
MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL
IMPORTS
NO. OF
2
4
6
8
MOTORS
CYL.
0
1
5
6
2
0
3
1
10
HC
MEAN S.
230.0
202.0
200.0
205.0
168.3
270.0
207.5
0
81
103
21
65
0
84
D.
.0
.7
.2
.2
.3
.0
.6
CO
MEAN S.D.
2.40
4.04
4.12
2.40
2.15
3.90
4.18
0.00
1.81
1.89
1.84
1.37
0.00
1.75
NOX
MEAN S.D.
69.1
75.4
41.3
53.6
43.4
80.2
59.1
0.0
19.1
15.7
31.9
28.6
0.0
21.9
02
MEAN S.D.
1.50
0.76
2.37
3.00
3-33
0.40
1.51
0.00
0.55
1.53
3.82
2.76
0.00
1.19
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 -
251 -
250
350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA
1800 -
2800 -
3800 .
1800 .
WEIGHT
2799
3799
4799
5799
3
1
4
6
4
4
5
1
168.3
270.0
247.5
180.8
193.7
183.7
232.0
180.0
65
0
104
65
73
53
111
0
.3.
.0
.0
.2
.6
.4
.6
.0
2.15
3.90
3.92
4.35
2.59
3.22
4.78
5.00
1.37
0.00
2.11
1.67
1.42
1.01
2.15
0.00
43.4
80.2
56.9
60.5
52.6
65.1
59.0
35.1
28.6
0.0
13-7
27.2
29.7
12.5
27.9
0.0
3-33
0.40
1.60
1.45
2.60
1.75
1.22
2.00
2.76
0.00
1.47
1.12
2.69
1-33
1.28
0.00
ALL VEHICLES 14
ASSIGN RESULTS ARE
203.6 79.0 3.72 1.78 57.2 23-3 1.82 1.71
HC PPM HEXANE , CO MOLE % ,NOX PPM , 02 %
3-327
-------
TABLE 21 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON PHASE
bUMMAKi ur rc^jJSSED VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE Hitl
MODE : IDLE (N)
DENVER
1972 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 25 VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
NO. OF CYL.
2
4
6
8
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 - 250
251 - 350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799
2800 - 3799
3800 - 4799
4800 - 5799
0
1
5
6
2
0
3
1
10
3
1
4
6
4
4
5
1
MEAN
175.
127.
146.
200.
158.
230.
138.
158.
230.
195.
100.
176.
170.
113.
140.
HC
0
0
7
0
3
0
5
3
0
0
8
2
0
0
0
S.D.
0.0
68.7
71.5
14.1
72.9
0.0
61.9
72.9
0.0
38.1
42.0
69.4
16.8
81.2
0.0
CO
MEAN
5
1
2
2
2
3
2
2
3
3
1
2
2
1
3
.00
.42
.22
.40
.17
.20
.05
.17
.20
.09
• 36
.42
.01
.81
.40
S.D.
0.00
1.13
2.05
0.00
0.40
0.00
1.99
0.40
0.00
2.72
1.11
0.61
2.06
2.27
0.00
NOX
MEAN
56.1
104.3
49-4
47.6
43-4
78.2
76.1
43. A
78.2
59.1
87.4
52.1
65.3
93-5
32.1
S.D.
0.0
34.2
18.0
23-4
18.0
0.0
38.4
18.0
0.0
16.2
46.0
22.8
28.0
41.9
0.0
MEAN
1.30
1.78
3.07
5.50
4.67'
0.50
2.51
4.67
0.50
1.30
3-32
3-62
1.37
2.88
5.20
02
S.D.
0.00
1.50
2.28
5.9*
*.«
0.00
2.02
(.«
o.oo
0.75
2.25
U.18
0$
2.3?
rtrt
o.oo
ALL VEHICLES
14
149.:
1.8
2.
1.69 69-:
2.83
EMISSION RESULTS ARE : HC PPM HEXANE , CO MOLE % ,NOX PPM , 02
3-328
-------
TABLE 21 CONT'D
DP FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST PROCEDURE EXHAUST EMISSION REDUCTIONS
ON PHASE 1 PASSED VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE
MODE : IDLE (N)
DENVER
1972 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 25 VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
VEHICLE
MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL
IMPORTS
NO. OF
2
4
6
8
MOTORS
CYL.
0
1
5
6
2
0
3
1
10
HC
IMPR JIMPR
55.0
75.0
53-3
5.0
10.0
40.0
69.0
23.9
37.1
26.7
2.4
5.9
14.8
33.3
IMPR
-2.60
2.62
1.91
0.00
-0.02
0.70
2.13
CO
$IMPR
-108
64
46
0
-0
17
50
.33
.85
.26
.00
.78
.95
.96
NOX
IMPR JIMPR
13-0
-28.9
-8.2
6.0
0.0
2.0
-17.1
18.8
-38.3
-19.8
11.2
0.0
2.5
-28.9
IMPR
0.20
-1.02
-0.70
-2.50
-1.33
-0.10
-1.00
02
5&IMPR
13-33
-134.21
-29.58
-83-33
-40.00
-25.00
-66.23
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 -
251 -
250
350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA
1800 -
2800 -
3800 -
hr»
1800 -
WEIGHT
2799
3799
4799
^7on
Dfyg
3
1
4
6
4
4
5
1
10.0
40.0
52.5
80.0
17.5
13.7
119.0
40.0
5.9
14.8
21.2
44.2
9.0
7.5
51.3
22.2
-0.02
0.70
0.84
2.99
0.16
1.21
2.97
1.60
-0
17
21
68
6
37
62
32
.78
.95
.34
.77
.28
.60
.13
.00
0.0
2.0
-2.3
-26.9
0.5
-0.2
-34.5
3-0
0.0
2.5
-4.0
-44.5
1.0
-0.3
-58.6
8.6
-1.33
-0.10
0.30
-1.87
-1.02
0.37
-1.66
-3.20
-40.00
-25.00
18.75
-128.74
-39.42
21.43
-136.07
-160.00
^ VEHICLES 14
ASSIGN RESULTS'ARE
54.3 26.7 1.57 42.09 -12.0 -21.0 -1.01 -55.29
HC PPM HEXANE , CO MOLE % ,NOX PPM , 02 %
3-329
-------
TABLE 21 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON ALL PHASP
5UMMAHI ur rc.yc.nH.. HICLES BEFORE MAINTENANCE ™ASE
BEFORE MAINTENANCE
MODE : 50 MPH
DENVER
1972 MO DEL- YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 25 VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
VEHICLE
MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL
IMPORTS
NO. OF
2
4
6
8
MOTORS
CYL.
1
3
6
11
4
0
6
3
16
MEAN
2000.0
185-0
180.8
139.5
130.0
130.0
796.7
157.8
HC
S.D
0.
8.
113.
40.
66.
51.
1042.
75.
CO
MEAN S.D.
0
7
8
4
2
7
1
6
3.50
3.07
2.08
1.90
2.94
3.86
2.47
1.71
0.00
0.76
2.74
1.19
3.40
3.23
1.70
1.05
NOX
MEAN S.D.
972.6
1675.7
2501.1
1584.1
1395.9
1265.0
2381.5
1830.0
0.0
467.1
1070.0
628.0
1002.8
849.7
1574.7
666.0
02
MEAN S.D.
1.00
0.67
1.07
1.70
1.25
1.58
1.97
1.29
0.00
0.23
0.46
1.51
0.8?
1.31
1.77
1.15
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 -
251 -
250
350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA
1800 -
2800 -
3800 -
4800 -
WEIGHT
2799
3799
4799
5799
6
2
8
9
7
9
8
1
130.0
195.0
388.1
157.8
407.1
152.8
176.2
60.0
51.
0.
652.
99.
704.
30.
98.
0.
7
0
0
3
4
2
8
0
3-86
1.95
1.96
1.68
3-34
1.94
1-91
1.80
3.23
2.05
1.00
1.23
3-20
1.04
1.43
0.00
1265.0
3085.9
1625.6
1916.5
1671.7
1766.5
1930.2
972.6
849-7
1407-8
568.9
768.2
1314-3
495-9
818.6
0.0
1.58
0.95
1.55
1.37
1.91
1.23
1.24
1.70
1.3»
0.21
1.58
1.07
1.5*
1.11
.A
o.oo
ALL VEHICLES 25
EMISSION RESULTS ARE
227.8 375.2 2.32 1.99 1760.6 864.3
: HC PPM HEXANE , CO MOLE % ,NOX PPM , 02 %
1.23
3-330
-------
TABLE 21 CONT'D
OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON ALL PHASE 1
VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE
MODE : 50 MPH
DENVER
1972 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 25 VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
NO. OF CYL.
2
4
6
8
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 - 250
251 - 350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799
2800 . 3799
3800 - n?99
1800 . 5?99
ALL VEHICLES
ASSIGN RESULTS
1
3
6
11
4
0
6
3
16
6
2
8
9
7
9
8
1
25
ARE
HC
MEAN S.D.
85
176
125
130
136
118
148
137
118
180
150
119
118
157
130
60
134
: HC
.0
.7
.0
.9
.2
.3
• 3
.2
• 3
.0
.6
.4
.6
.2
.6
.0
.0
PPM
0.0
10.4
49-2
52.4
64.5
57-7
56.9
48.5
57.7
21.2
52.9
42.2
60.4
39-5
45.1
0.0
50.3
HEXANE
CO
MEAN S.D.
0.40
3.10
1.78
1.94
2.71
2.70
1.60
1.97
2.70
2.20
2.03
1.75
1.99
2.36
1.84
2.70
2.10
0.00
0.30
0.66
1.05
3.05
2.37
1.59
0.95
2.37
1.70
1.20
0.82
2.29
1.06
1.03
0.00
1.44
, CO MOLE %
NOX
MEAN S.
3085.9
1700.6
2115-3
1306.5
1963.7
1748.0
2679-4
1536.3
1748.0
2476.2
1577.2
1672.1
2252.0
1432.3
1773.2
266.2
1724.3
0
320
776
568
1554
1342
974
542
1342
1284
654
674
1377
239
522
0
880
,NOX PPM ,
D.
.0
.0
.0
.3
.6
.1
.2
.0
.1
.6
.1
.0
.8
.1
.1
.0
.8
02
02
MEAN S.D.
1.00
0.73
0.85
1.98
1.10
1.28
0.70
1.54
1.28
0.55
1.32
1.68
1.17
1.27
1.37
3.90
1.38
%
0.00
0.32
0.30
1.56
0.43
0.85
0.26
1-35
0.85
0.07
0.88
1.64
0.82
0.85
1.53
0.00
1.17
3-331
-------
TABLE 21 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST PROCEDURE EXHAUST EMISSION
bUMMAHi ur rauani VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE
MODE : 50 MPH
DENVER
1972 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 25 VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL
IMPORTS
NO. OF
2
4
6
8
MOTORS
CYL.
1
3
6
11
4
0
6
3
16
HC
IMPR $IMPR
1915.0
8.3
55.8
8.6
-6.3
11.7
648.3
20.6
95.7
4.5
30.9
6.2
-4.8
9-0
81.4
13-1
CO
IMPR JIMPR
3-10
-0.03
0.30
-0.04
0.23
1.16
0.87
-0.27
88.57
-1.09
14.40
-2.15
7.89
30.11
35.14
-15.75
NOX
IMPR JIMPR
-2113
-24
385
277
-567
-483
-297
293
.3
.9
.7
.6
.9
.0
.9
.8
-217.3
-1.5
15.4
17.5
-40.7
-38.2
-12.5
16.1
IMPR
3-00
-0.07
0.22
-0.28
0.15
0.30
1.27
-0.25
02
JfflPfi
75.00
-10.00
20.31
-16.58
12.00
18.95
61.11
-19-32
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 -
251 -
250
350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA
1800 -
2800 -
3800 -
4800 -
WEIGHT
2799
3799
4799
5799
6
2
8
9
7
9
8
1
11.7
15.0
237.5
38.3
288.6
-4.4
45.6
0.0
9.0
7.7
61.2
24.3
70.9
-2.9
25.9
0.0
1.16
-0.25
-0.07
-0.07
1-35
-0.42
0.06
-0.90
30.11
-12.82
-3-50
-4.30
40.55
-21.78
3.28
-50.00
-483
609
48
244
-580
334
157
706
.0
.7
.5
.4
.3
.2
.1
.4
-38.2
19.8
3-0
12.8
-34.7
18.9
8.1
72.6
0.30
0.40
0.22
-0.31
0.71*
-0.03
-0.14
-2.20
18.95
12,11
11.52
-22.76
38.81
-2.70
-11,11
-129."1
ALL VEHICLES 25 93-8 41.2 0.21 9.12 36.4 2.1
EMISSION RESULTS ARE : HC PPM HEXANE , CO MOLE % ,NOX PPM , 02 %
0.06
1.13
3-332
-------
TABLE 21 CONT'D
n,muARY OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON ALL PHASE 1
SUMMA1U vr VEHICLES BEFORR MATNTRNANCR
VEHICLES BEFORE MAINTENANCE
MODE : 30 MPH
DENVER
1972 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 25 VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
VEHICLE
MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL
IMPORTS
NO. OF
2
H
6
8
MOTORS
CYL.
1
3
6
11
4
0
6
3
16
MEAN
2000.0
300.0
183-3
240.9
190.0
171.7
906.7
228.7
HC
S.D.
0.
70.
100.
70.
49.
63-
947.
72.
0
0
6
6
8
1
1
2
CO
MEAN S.D.
2.90
2.87
1.43
2.49
1.75
2.05
3.23
2.03
0.00
2.15
0.71
1.42
0.90
0.84
1.63
1.39
NOX
MEAN S.D.
860.0
946.6
1887-3
998.1
1163-9
1380.7
1330.6
1148.9
0.0
170.9
795-5
537.8
639.7
1002.6
745.3
548.5
02
MEAN S.D.
4.20
0.80
1.10
1.89
1.10
1.90
1.83
1.34
0.00
0.44
0.51
1.93
0.83
2.06
2.05
1.21
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 -
251 -
250
350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA
1800 -
2800 _
3800 -
1800 -
WEIGHT
2799
3799
4799
5799
6
2
8
9
7
9
8
1
171.7
360.0
483.1
199.4
450.7
257.8
227.5
115.0
63.
28.
616.
65.
688.
78.
67.
0.
1
3
0
3
5
0
6
0
2.05
3.40
2.61
1.61
2.15
2.36
1.94
2.70
0.84
2.26
1.70
0.81
0.84
1.80
1.20
0.00
1380.7
1566.0
923.2
1317-4
1334.7
1152.0
1323-6
358.3
1002.6
882.5
459.7
553-9
963-0
504.6
580.5
0.0
1.90
0.65
1.60
1.43
2.20
1.28
1.22
1.70
2.06
0.07
1.61
1.19
2.10
1.16
1.28
0.00
ALL VEHICLES 25
RESULTS ARE
296.4 363-8 2.18 1.31 1226.3 674.6 1.54 1.49
: HC PPM HEXANE , CO MOLE % ,NOX PPM , 02 %
3-333
-------
TABLE 21 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF FEDERAL ™jjEN°««g ffiffi!c?ESULTS °N *LL
MODE : 30 MPH
DENVER
1972 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 25 VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
NO. OF CYL.
2
4
6
8
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 - 250
251 - 350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799
2800 - 3799
3800 - 4799
4800 - 5799
1
3
6
11
4
0
6
3
16
6
2
8
9
7
9
8
1
HC
MEAN S.D.
160
256
180
205
197
183
246
201
183
290
229
172
204
215
201
90
.0
.7
.0
.9
.5
• 3
.7
.6
• 3
.0
.4
.2
• 3
.0
.2
.0
0.0
10.4
74.0
79.3
34.0
34.4
80.8
73.4
34.4
42.4
71.9
63.5
59.1
53.7
84.2
0.0
C
MEAN
1.25
2.47
2.03
1.97
1.65
1.77
2.98
1.85
1.77
3-85
1.81
1.82
1.93
1.67
2.19
3.10
0
S.D.
0.00
1.61
1.16
1.26
1.19
0.94
1.57
1.18
0.94
0.64
1.39
0.98
1.09
1.21
1.33
0.00
NOX
MEAN S.D.
614.
1389.
1324.
852.
1262.
1199.
1112.
1039.
1199.
1361.
908.
1107.
1225.
1006.
1168.
164.
3
0
5
7
1
0
6
1
0
8
7
7
7
9
9
2
0.0
415.1
459-7
413-5
563.6
555.2
609.2
463-9
555-2
608.2
418.7
500.3
605.2
389-0
399-9
0.0
02
MEAN S.D.
0.50
0.80
0.88
2.35
1.12
1.75
0.53
1.65
1.75
0.55
1.39
1.76
1.46
1.46
1.39
4.10
0.00
O.fl
0.40
1.94
0.41
1.83
0.05
1.W
1.83
0.01
0.93
1.82
l.fl
0.82
1.7'
o.ofl
ALL VEHICLES 25
EMISSION RESULTS ARE
202.6 67.0 1.97 1.18 1086.3 484.1
: HC PPM HEXANE , CO MOLE % ,NOX PPM , 02 I
1.54
1.18
3-334
-------
TABLE 21 CONT'D
nF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST PROCEDURE EXHAUST EMISSION REDUCTIONS
ur FDV fffTER MAINTENANCE
MODE : 30 MPH
DENVER
1972 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 25 VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
VEHICLE
MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL
IMPORTS
NO. OF
2
1
6
8
MOTORS
CYL.
1
3
6
11
4
0
6
3
16
HC
IMPR *IMPR
1840
43
3
35
-7
-11
660
27
.0
.3
.3
.0
.5
.7
.0
.2
92.0
14.4
1.8
14.5
-3-9
-6.8
72.8
11.9
IMPR
1.65
0.40
-0.60
0.51
0.10
0.29
0.25
0.18
CO
5&IMPR
56.90
13.95
-41.86
20.66
5.98
13-96
7.73
8.78
NOX
IMPR JIMPR
245.7
-442.3
562.8
145.3
-98.2
181.7
218.0
109.8
28.6
-46.7
29.8
14.6
-8.4
13.2
16.4
9.6
IMPR
3.70
0.00
0.22
-0.45
-0.02
0.15
1.30
-0.31
02
$IMPR
88.10
0.00
19.70
-24.04
-2.27
7.89
70.91
-22.79
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 -
251 -
250
350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA
1800 -
2800 -
3800 -
li A
4800 -
WEIGHT
2799
3799
4799
5799
6
2
8
9
7
9
8
1
-11
70
253
27
246
42
26
25
-7
.0
.7
.2
.4
.8
.2
.0
-6.8
19.4
52.5
13.6
54.7
16.6
11.5
21.7
0.29
-0.45
0.80
-0.21
0.22
0.69
-0.25
-0.40
13.96
-13-24
30.70
-13.10
10.12
29.18
-12.90
-14.81
181.7
204.2
14.5
209-7
109.1
145.1
154.7
194.2
13-2
13.0
1.6
15.9
8.2
12.6
11.7
54.2
0.15
0.10
0.21
-0.32
0.74
-0.18
-0.16
-2.40
7.89
15.38
13-28
-22.48
33-77
-13.91
-13-27
-141.18
VEHICLES
25
93-8 31.6 0.21 9.77 140.0 11.4 -0.00 -0.26
RESULTS ARE : HC PPM HEXANE , CO MOLE % ,NOX PPM , 02 %
3-335
-------
TABLE 21 CONT'D
SUMMABY OF FEDERAL THRE^MODE^EST^ROCEDUR^RESULTS ON ALL PH4SE
MODE : IDLE (D)
DENVER
1972 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 25 VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
NO. OF CYL.
2
4
6
8
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 - 250
251 - 350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799
2800 - 3799
3800 - 4799
4800 - 5799
1
3
5
10
0
0
0
3
16
0
2
8
9
2
8
8
1
MEAN
2000.
493-
247.
435.
1100.
360.
650.
601.
328.
1170.
424.
398.
145.
0
3
0
5
0
6
0
2
9
0
4
7
0
HC
S.D.
0
412
91
235
838
213
438
601
214
1173
293
223
0
.0
.0
.4
.0
.8
.5
.4
.5
.0
.8
.7
.2
.0
CO
MEAN S.D.
8.60
7.00
3.48
6.25
7.43
5.45
6.85
6.46
4.90
6.15
6.30
5.26
4.70
0.00
4.36
1.83
2.68
3.31
2.89
4.45
3-41
2.30
3.46
3.69
2.50
0.00
NOX
MEAN S.D.
54.1
55-3
139-7
62.0
74.9
82.1
85.3
67-1
92.4
107-9
74.8
85.6
40.1
0.0
53-4
37-9
31.2
78.4
45.7
107.9
33.7
51.7
76.0
51-3
47-8
o.o
02
MEAN S.D,
4.10
1-57
0.88
1.62
2.20
1.42
1.25
1.75
1.43
2.30
1.56
1.30
1.90
......
0.00
0.61
O.I?
1.15
1.81
1.01
1.06
1.«
0.93
2,55
1.05
1.02
flrt
o.oo
ALL VEHICLES 19 477.4 439.2 5-76 2.95 81.0 49-3
EMISSION RESULTS ARE : HC PPM HEXANE , CO MOLE % ,NOX PPM , 02
1.55
3-336
-------
TABLE 21 CONT'D
mnmav OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON ALL PHASE 1
SUMMAKI ur VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE
VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE
MODE : IDLE (D)
DENVER
1972 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 25 VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
NO. OF CYL.
2
4
6
8
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 - 250
251 - 350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799
2800 - 3700
1 1 y y
3800 . 4799
h n
1800 . 57g9
1
3
5
10
0
0
0
3
16
0
2
8
9
2
8
8
1
MEAN
190.
170.
148.
246.
235.
200.
257.
236.
166.
260.
204.
203.
125.
0
0
0
5
0
0
5
9
1
0
4
1
0
HC
S.D.
0.
73.
109.
154.
82.
139.
102.
98.
159-
99-
64.
192.
0.
0
7
6
1
3
8
5
8
6
0
9
0
0
CO
MEAN S.D.
2.60
2.38
1.38
2.24
2.62
1.95
2.62
2.62
1.42
2.80
1.97
1.77
3-50
0.00
2.15
1.10
1.97
0.38
1.84
0.53
2.28
1.05
0.28
1.65
2.05
0.00
NOX
MEAN S.D.
136.4
73.5
204.2
120.7
121.9
138.7
114.6
104.9
168.4
150.3
114.7
166.0
38.1
0.0
9-7
98.0
86.9
51.1
95.9
70.0
61.9
108.4
19-6
84.0
102.2
0.0
02
MEAN S.D.
0.50
1.53
2.08
2.66
0.77
2.49
0.90
2.07
2.63
0.55
2.22
2.31
4.70
0.00
0.35
1.67
2.01
0.38
1.76
0.42
1.56
1.99
0.07
1.40
2.02
0.00
ALL VEHICLES 19
^SSION RESULTS ARE
205.5 131.2 2.06 1.71 136.0 89.4 2.22 1.73
: HC PPM HEXANE , CO MOLE % ,NOX PPM , 02 %
3-337
-------
TABLE 21 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST PROCEDURE EXHAUST EMISSION
bUMMAKi ur rw/wuuj ^ ^^ ^ VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE
MODE : IDLE (D)
DENVER
1972 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 25 VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL
IMPORTS
NO. OF
2
4
6
8
MOTORS
CYL.
1
3
5
10
0
0
0
3
16
HC
IMPR UIMPR
1810.
323.
99.
189.
865.
160.
0
3
0
0
0
6
90.5
65.5
40.1
43.4
78.6
44.5
CO
IMPR flMPR
6.00
4.62
2.10
4.01
4.82
3.50
69.77
65.95
60.34
64.16
64.80
64.22
NOX
IMPR JIMPR
-82.3
-18.2
-64.5
-58.6
-47.0
-56.5
-152.0
-33.0
-46.1
-94.5
-62.7
-68.9
IMPR
3-60
0.03
-1.20
-1.04
1.43
-1.06
02
KDffi
87.80
2.1]
-136.*
-611.28
65.15
-7156
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 -
251 -
250
350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA
1800 -
2800 -
3800 -
4800 -
WEIGHT
2799
3799
4799
5799
0
2
8
9
2
8
8
1
392.
364.
162.
910.
220.
195.
20.
5
4
8
0
0
6
0
60.4
60.6
49.5
77.8
51.8
49.1
13.8
4.22
3-84
3.48
3.35
4.33
3.49
1.20
61.68
59.38
70.98
54.47
68.75
66.27
25.53
-29.3
-37.8
-76.1
-42.4
-40.0
-80.4
2.0
-34.4
-56.4
-82.3
-39.3
-53-5
-93-9
5.0
0.35
-0.32
-1.20
1.75
-0.66
-1.01
-2.80
28.00
-18.5!
-83.72
76J
JI2.M
-TT.»
-HT-fl
ALL VEHICLES 19
EMISSION RESULTS ARE
271.8 56.9 3.71 64.34 -55.0 -68.0 -0-67
HC PPM HEXANE , CO MOLE % ,NOX PPM , 02 %
3-338
-------
TABLE 21 CONT'D
DP FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON ALL PHASE 1
VEHICLES BEFORE MAINTENANCE
MODE : IDLE (N)
DENVER
1972 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 25 VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
NO. OF CYL.
2
4
6
8
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 - 250
251 - 350
M°flE THAN 350
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 . 2799
2800 - 370ft
1 1 yo
*\(\ ^
3800 . 4799
"800 , 5?99
ALL VEHICLES
ASSIGN RESULTS
1
3
6
11
4
0
6
3
16
6
2
8
9
7
9
8
1
25
ARE
HC
MEAN S.D.
2000
623
300
404
310
354
1186
354
354
780
573
342
583
436
395
180
454
: HC
.0
.3
.0
.1
.0
.2
.7
.4
.2
.0
.1
.8
.6
.7
.0
.0
.2
PPM
0.0
580.5
250.9
302.2
149.0
257-5
869.6
261.3
257.5
721.2
614.5
296.9
668.0
384.2
296.6
0.0
442.4
HEXANE
CO
MEAN S.D.
8.60
7.20
4.90
5.78
5.02
5.16
7.50
5.61
5.16
6.95
6.54
5.12
5.16
6.47
5.49
5.00
5.73
0.00
4.18
2.65
2.73
3-22
3.46
3.20
2.64
3-46
4.31
3.14
2.11
3-38
3.23
2.27
0.00
2.86
, CO MOLE %
NOX
MEAN S.D.
40
38
69
38
63
53
43
49
53
45
43
54
49
49
52
35
49
,NOX
.1
.1
.9
.2
.4
.1
.4
.9
.1
.1
.6
.4
.2
.5
.6
.1
.9
PPM
0.0
29.7
21.9
15.1
27.6
27.3
35.2
22.3
27-3
49.6
19-2
23-6
21.8
29.6
23.1
0.0
24.0
, 02
02
MEAN S.D.
4.00
1.43
1.07
1.78
1.72
2.25
2.17
1.32
2.25
1.25
1.62
1.36
2.49
1.36
1.20
2.00
1.65
%
0.00
0.70
0.90
1-31
2.65
2.25
1.80
0.99
2.25
1.20
1.44
0.92
2.18
1.03
0.99
0.00
1.46
3-339
-------
TABLE 21 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF FEDERAL ^MODEJEST PROCEDUREJESULTS ON ALL P84SE ,
MODE : IDLE (N)
DENVER
1972 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 25 VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
NO. OF CYL.
2
4
6
8
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 - 250
251 - 350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799
2800 - 3799
3800 - 4799
4800 - 5799
1
3
6
11
4
0
6
3
16
6
2
8
9
7
9
8
1
MEAN
150.0
148.3
129.2
180.0
262.5
210.8
183-3
161.6
210.8
200.0
163-7
158.3
205.0
160.0
173-1
140.0
HC
S.D.
0.
41.
61.
150.
118.
123.
41.
128.
123.
42.
49.
169.
115.
38.
183.
0.
0
9
7
2
7
6
6
1
6
4
9
0
7
8
2
0
CO
MEAN S.D.
2.
3.
1.
2.
3.
3-
3-
2.
3.
3.
2.
1.
2.
2.
1.
3-
20
05
72
25
52
17
00
03
17
40
67
48
70
66
77
40
0.00
2.28
1.24
1.71
1.47
1.35
0.72
1.76
1.35
0.28
2.13
1.03
0.72
2.00
1.80
0.00
NOX
MEAN S.D.
96.2
59.1
97.5
67.8
69.0
62.4
76.5
79.8
62.4
66.6
63.1
96.4
70.2
60.7
101.3
32.1
0.0
6.1
34.9
50.9
39.2
33-2
20.6
47.6
33.2
16.3
18.5
58.2
32.8
18.9
57.2
0.0
02
MEAN s.J,
0.60
1.30
1.67
2.39
3-32
2.90
0.70
2.16
2.90
0.75
1.51
2.54
2.39
1.61
2.17
5.20
•••••
0.00
0.30
1-31
1.58
11.28
3.M
0.2S
Ul
3-«
0.35
1.08
2.15
0.52
2.0?
flrt
o.oo
ALL VEHICLES 25
EMISSION RESULTS ARE
176. 0 118.4 2.42 1.62 75.2 41.7
: HC PPM HEXANE , CO MOLE % ,NOX PPM , 02
2.16
2.20
3-340
-------
TABLE 21 CONT'D
O.WMARY OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST PROCEDURE EXHAUST EMISSION REDUCTIONS
SUMMARY ur TD ON ^L pHASE 1 y^^^ AFTER MAINTENANCE
MODE : IDLE (N)
DENVER
1972 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
.TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 25 VEHICLES
NO
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
NO. OF CYL.
2
4
6
8
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 - 250
251 - 350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799
2800 - 3799
3800 - Jjygg
llOnn
11800 - 5799
^ VEHICLES
ASSIGN RESULTS
. OF
VEH
1
3
6
11
4
0
6
3
16
6
2
8
9
7
9
8
1
25
ARE
I
IMPR
1850.0
475.0
170.8
224.1
47.5
143.3
1003.3
192.8
143-3
580.0
409.4
184.4
378.6
276.7
221.9
40.0
278.2
: HC PPM
HC
5&IMPR
92.5
76.2
56.9
55.5
15.3
40.5
84.6
54.4
40.5
74.4
71.4
53.8
64.9
63.4
56.2
22.2
61.3
HEXANE ,
I
6
4
3
3
1
1
4
3
1
3
3
3
2
3
3
1
3
CO
C
MPR
.40
.15
.18
.53
.50
.99
.50
.58
.99
.55
.87
.64
.46
.81
-71
.60
.31
MOLE
0
74.42
57.64
64.97
61.13
29.85
38.61
60.00
63.86
38.61
51.08
59.18
71.15
47-72
58.85
67-65
32.00
57.80
% ,NOX
IMPR
-56.1
-21.0
-27.6
-29.6
-5.6
-9.3
-33-1
-29-9
-9.3
-21.5
-19.5
-42.0
-21.0
-11.1
-48.7
3.0
-25.3
PPM ,
NOX
*IMI
-140.
-55.
-39-
-77.
-8.
-17.
-76.
-60.
-17.
-47.
-44.
-77.
-42.
-22.
-92.
8.
-50.
02 %
>R
,0
.3
,5
6
9
5
2
0
5
8
8
3
6
4
5
6
8
IMPR
3-40
0.13
-0.60
-0.61
-1.60
-0.65
1.47
-0.84
-0.65
0.50
0.09
-1.19
0.10
-0.29
-0.97
-3-20
-0.52
02
JIMPR
85.00
9.30
-56.25
-34.18
-92.75
-28.89
67.69
-63-21
-28.89
40.00
5-38
-87.70
4.02
-21.31
-81.25
-160.00
-31.31
3-341
-------
TABLE 21 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON ALL FATiPn
bUMMAHl ur rauDAHi, VEHICLES BEFORE MAINTENANCE MILED
MODE : 50 MPH
DENVER
1972 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 111 VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
NO. OF CYL.
2
4
6
8
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 - 250
251 - 350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799
2800 - 3799
3800 - 4799
4800 - 5799
AI I lM?UTr«T r.o
2
10
14
16
8
0
14
8
28
14
7
17
12
17
19
13
1
MEAN
1115.0
224.5
218.2
162.5
175.6
205.4
430.6
186.2
205.4
206.4
306.8
166.7
320.0
203.2
161.2
140.0
HC
S.D.
1251.
69.
91.
43.
73.
94.
634.
68.
94.
31.
441.
64.
441.
62.
62.
0.
6
0
9
4
2
9
8
9
9
1
7
2
0
3
8
0
CO
MEAN S.D.
4.
4.
4.
1.
2.
4.
3.
2.
4.
3.
2.
2.
4.
2.
2.
2.
25
12
10
88
70
14
54
59
14
55
39
94
14
59
85
20
1.06
1.38
2.41
1.00
2.40
2.77
1.47
1.51
2.77
1.58
1.35
1.70
2.60
1.34
1.71
0.00
NOX
MEAN S.D.
824.2
1159.8
1212.1
1513.8
1721.2
1414.0
1312.6
1353-9
1414.0
1361.2
1319.7
1370.5
1356.4
1465.2
1312.5
245.7
V
209-9
529.9
608.4
717.6
1009-3
870.5
731-7
646.4
870.5
776.3
766.0
428.3
891-2
679-5
451-0
0.0
_ i.
02
MEAN S.D.
2.25
0.69
0.88
1.13
0.86
0.89
1.21
0.95
0.89
0.81
1.18
0.88
0.99
0.91
1.01
0.90
n 07
2.4?
0.28
0,46
0.?!
0.55
0.55
1.19
0.59
0.55
0.12
0.9'
0.63
0.93
0.31
On
0.80
ftA
o.oo
o.io
50
EMISSION RESULTS ARE
230.7 265.3
HC PPM HEXANE , CO MOLE % ,NOX PPM , 02
3-342
-------
TABLE 21 CONT'D
OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON ALL FAILED
u VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE
MODE : 50 MPH
DENVER
1972 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 111 VEHICLES
N(
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
NO. OF CYL.
2
1
6
8
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 - 250
251 - 350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799
2800 - 3?99
3800 . iiygg
Il0n«i
4800 - 5799
ALL VEHICLES
3. OF
VEH
2
10
14
16
8
0
14
8
28
14
7
17
12
17
19
13
1
50
MEAN
165.0
193-5
217.1
148.7
145.0
191.1
181.2
168.6
191.1
195.0
165.0
166.7
193.2
170.8
164.2
180.0
176.9
HC
S.
113
45
90
48
75
110
49
53
110
33
59
49
104
50
50
0
72
D.
.1
.6
.0
.4
.4
.8
.8
.2
.8
.7
.4
.1
.4
.9
.0
.0
.6
C
MEAN
2.35
3.84
3-38
1.88
2.11
3.41
2.74
2.42
3.41
3.07
2.20
2.57
3.19
2.58
2.45
2.40
2.75
:0
S.D.
2.76
1.44
2.30
1.09
2.33
2.80
1.37
1.49
2.80
1.07
1.32
1.79
2.64
1.26
1.79
0.00
1.94
H
MEAN
2049.8
1157.1
1532.5
1222.8
1402.5
1263-6
1794.3
1280.9
1263.6
1609.7
1262.7
1457.0
1381.4
1302.9
1394.4
1543.0
1358.2
IOX
S.
1465
586
778
446
788
764
986
484
764
904
596
565
948
460
591
0
678
D.
.3
.5
.1
.2
.4
.2
.5
.1
.2
.2
.4
.4
.9
.8
.4
.0
.3
(
MEAN
0.75
0.64
0.76
1.32
1.30
0.99
0.75
1.08
0.99
0.71
1.23
0.86
0.91
1.18
0.90
0.60
1.00
D2
S.D.
0.35
0.42
0.47
0.83
1.26
1.01
0.47
0.75
1.01
0.49
0.80
0.61
0.93
0.74
0.71
0.00
0.79
* 1
SION RESULTS ARE : HC PPM HEXANE , CO MOLE % ,NOX PPM , 02 %
3-343
-------
TABLE 21 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST PROCEDURE EXHAUST EMISSION
ON ALL FAILED VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE
MODE : 50 MPH
DENVER
1972 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
• TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 1 1 1 VEHICLES
N(
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
NO. OF CYL.
2
4
6
8
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 - 250
251 - 350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799
2800 - 3799
3800 - 4799
4800 - 5799
ALL VEHICLES
5. OF
VEH
2
10
14
16
8
0
14
8
28
14
7
17
12
17
19
13
1
50
Y
IMPR
950.0
31.0
1.1
13-7
30.6
14.3
249.4
17.7
14.3
11.4
141.8
0.0
126.8
32.4
-3.1
-40.0
53.8
1C
$IMPR
85.2
13.8
0.5
8.5
17.4
7.0
57.9
9.5
7.0
5.5
46.2
0.0
39.6
15.9
-1.9
-28.6
23.3
II
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-0
0
c
UPR
.90
.28
.71
.00
.59
.73
.81
.16
.73
.48
.19
• 37
.95
.01
.40
.20
_m
:o
56IMPR
44.71
6.80
17.44
0.17
21.69
17-73
22.75
6.35
17.73
13.48
8.12
12.46
23.04
0.20
14.05
-9.09
•n.m
IMP
-1225.
2.
-320.
291.
318.
150.
-481.
73.
150.
-248.
56.
-86.
-25.
162.
-82.
-1297.
e;.
N
R
6
7
4
0
7
3
7
0
3
6
9
5
1
3
0
2
Q
OX
JIMPR
-148.7
0.2
-26.4
19.2
18.5
10.6
-36.7
5.4
10.6
-18.3
4.3
-6.3
-1.8
11.1
-6.2
-527-9
0.4
IMPR
1.50
0.05
0.12
-0.19
-0.44
-0.11
0.46
-0.13
-0.11
0.10
-0.05
0.02
0.09
-0.24
0.11
0.30
-0.03
02
fun
~~— ^
66.61
7.25
13.82
-17.13
-50.72
-12.10
38.14
-13-53
-12.10
12.28
-11.50
2.83
-25-8'
10.l>9
33-33
.2.87
EMISSION RESULTS ARE : HC MM HEXANE , CO MOLE % ,NOX PPM , 02 %
3-344
-------
TABLE 21 CONT'D
OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON ALL FAILED
U VEHICLES BEFORE MAINTENANCE
MODE : 30 MPH
DENVER
1972 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 111 VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
VEHICLE
MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL
IMPORTS
NO. OF
2
1
6
8
MOTORS
CYL.
2
10
14
16
8
0
14
8
28
MEAN
1225.0
330.5
302.5
323.1
198.7
248.2
573.7
310.2
HC
S.
1096
99
132
192
52
123
578
164
D.
.0
.5
.5
.7
.6
.4
.1
.3
CO
MEAN S.D.
2.95
3-60
3.02
2.38
1.01
1.79
4.56
2.46
0.07
1.66
2.54
1.44
0.65
1.98
2.30
1.33
NOX
MEAN S.D.
839.5
1001.7
1125-3
904.4
1280.3
1424.5
869.6
902.3
29.0
395.4
898.9
588.4
530.1
847.1
417-1
496.1
02
MEAN S.D.
2.40
0.67
0.97
1.11
0.95
1.09
1.09
0.95
2.55
0.22
0.70
0.90
0.50
0.72
1.29
0.71
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 -
251 -
250
350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA
1800 -
2800 -
3800 .
1800 .
WEIGHT
2799
3799
4799
5799
14
7
17
12
17
19
13
1
248.2
370.0
454.7
246.2
378.2
365.3
243.1
220.0
123
49
440
85
436
173
83
0
.4
.7
.1
.9
.4
.6
.2
.0
1.79
4.80
2.49
2.45
2.50
2.74
2.59
2.20
1.98
2.38
1.16
1.54
2.61
1.55
1.39
0.00
1424.5
871.0
868.4
946.6
1225.1
1053.5
855.9
191.9
847.1
450.5
519.2
456.3
828.5
500.2
482.5
0.0
1.09
0.64
1.18
0.89
1.18
0.92
0.96
0.50
0.72
0.31
1.04
0.75
1.05
0.57
0.82
0.00
ALL VEHICLES 50
***** RESULTS ARE
335.0 280.1 2.61 1.90 1043-3 639.3 1.01 0.81
HC PPM HEXANE , CO MOLE % ,NOX PPM , 02 %
3-345
-------
TABLE 21 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF FEDERAL ™B»*JBT PROCEDU^RESULTS ON ALL FAIL®
MODE : 30 MPH
DENVER
1972 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 111 VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
NO. OF CYL.
2
if
6
8
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 - 250
251 - 350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799
2800 - 3799
3800 - 4799
4800 - 5799
ALL VEHICLES
2
10
14
16
8
0
14
8
28
14
7
17
12
17
19
13
1
50
HC
MEAN S.D.
277-5
251.0
266.1
252.2
191.2
241.1
297.5
235.7
241.1
317.1
258.8
196.7
259.7
263.7
204.6
270.0
247.1
166.
66.
127.
113-
71.
131.
78.
96.
131.
59.
108.
61.
127.
106.
60.
0.
105.
2
9
5
6
4
1
2
3
1
4
1
6
5
7
4
0
1
CO
MEAN S.D.
2.47
2.92
1.69
2.06
1.05
1.22
3.48
1.94
1.22
3.80
1.89
1.94
1.68
2.21
1.99
2.70
1.98
1.73
1.98
1.32
1.34
0.72
1.02
1.79
1.32
1.02
1.67
1.25
1.43
1.44
1.69
1.33
0.00
1.49
NOX
MEAN S.D.
660.
1029-
1288.
698.
1112.
1253-
957.
875.
1253.
1006.
726.
1064.
1117.
876.
1007.
972.
994.
4
8
4
0
1
9
4
3
9
4
4
5
4
4
8
6
4
65.2
613-2
666.4
370.2
629.1
770.6
666.2
420.4
770.6
703.9
316.0
470.6
772.3
472.7
488.3
0.0
588.1
02
MEAN S.D.
0.55
0.70
0.90
1.42
1.35
1.18
0.61
1.17
1.18
0.63
1.31
0.92
1.00
1.32
0.92
0.40
1.09
0.0?
0.11
0.13
0.95
1.38
1.06
0.15
0.83
1.06
0.18
0.89
0.71
1.00
0.8'
0.72
Art
o.oo
0.87
EMISSION RESULTS ARE : HC PPM HEXANE , CO MOLE % ,NOX PPM , 02 %
3-346
-------
TABLE 21 CONT'D
,*IUARY nF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST PROCEDURE EXHAUST EMISSION REDUCTIONS
SUMMARY ur ruw ED VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE
QN
FAILED VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE
MODE : 30 MPH
DENVER
1972 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 111 VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
VEHICLE
MFG.
AHER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL
IMPORTS
NO. OF
2
1
6
8
MOTORS
CYL.
2
10
14
16
8
0
14
8
28
HC
IMPR $IMPR
947.5
79.5
36.4
70.9
7.5
7.1
276.2
74.5
77.3
24.1
12.0
22.0
3.8
2.9
48.1
24.0
IMPR
0.48
0.69
1.34
0.32
-0.04
0.58
1.08
0.52
CO
16.10
19.00
44.27
13-52
-3.72
32.25
23.70
21.28
NOX
IMPR JIMPR
179.2
-28.2
-163-1
206.4
168.2
170.7
-87.7
27.0
21
-2
-14
22
13
12
-10
3
.3
.8
.5
.8
.1
.0
.1
.0
IMPR
1.85
-0.03
0.07
-0.31
-0.40
-0.09
0.47
-0.23
02
5&IMPR
77.08
-4.48
7.35
-28.09
-42.11
-7.84
43.68
-24.15
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151 14
151 -
251 -
250
350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA
1800 -
2800 -
3800 -
JlOrtM
4800 -
WEIGHT
2799
3799
1799
5799
7
17
12
17
19
13
1
7.1
52.9
195.9
49.6
118.5
101.6
38.5
-50.0
2.9
14.3
43.1
20.1
31.3
27-8
15.8
-22.7
0.58
1.00
0.60
0.51
0.82
0.53
0.60
-0.50
32.25
20.83
23-97
20.92
32.77
19.46
23.29
-22.73
170.7
-135.4
142.0
-117-8
107-7
177.1
-151.9
-780.7
12
-15
16
-12
8
16
-17
-406
.0
.5
.4
.4
.8
.8
.7
.7
-0.09
0.01
-0.14
-0.03
0.18
-0.39
0.05
0.10
-7.84
2.22
-11.50
-3.74
15.00
-42.86
4.80
20.00
50 87.9 26.2
.*
RESULTS ARE : HC PPM HEXANE ,
0.63 24.07 48.8
CO MOLE % ,NOX PPM , 02 %
4.7 -0.08 -7-52
3-347
-------
TABLE 21 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF FEDERAL THRENODE
°N ALL PAILBD
NO. OF
VEH
MODE : IDLE (D)
DENVER
1972 MODEL- YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 111 VEHICLES
HC CO NOX
MEAN S.D. MEAN S.D. MEAN S.D.
02
MEAN S.D.
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
1
9
10
14
2
2000.0
580.0
669-5
501.4
455.0
0.
404.
524.
170.
176.
0
0
1
4
8
8.60
7.96
5.98
8.11
7.35
0.00
2.43
3-63
1.87
0.78
54.1
39.1
136.8
46.3
64.1
0.0
22.3
226.6
24.7
25.5
4.10
1.09
1.02
1.27
0.75
0.00
0.55
0.97
0.95
0.1}
NO. OF CYL.
2
4
6
8
0
4
5
27
538.7
914.0
560.0
280.
666.
382.
7
5
9
6.37
8.96
7.33
2.44
1.24
2.79
68.6
197.4
47.7
16.6
322.2
31.4
0.77
1.40
1.23
0.13
1.68
0,86
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN
151 -
251 -
MORE THAN
151
250
350
350
4
4
16
12
538.7
642.5
663-7
541.7
280.
317.
543.
340.
7
5
6
9
6.37
9-05
8.15
6.35
2.44
1.42
2.14
3.21
68.6
233-2
48.6
47.2
16.6
360.4
34.7
26.4
0.77
0.72
1.34
1.32
0.13
0.85
1.10
0.91
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 -
2800 -
3800 -
4800 -
AT T l/PUTf
2799
3799
4799
5799
I I7O
6
16
13
1
-^ f
835.8
613.1
513.8
340.0
^> _ *- «.
623.
417.
331.
0.
7
6
2
0
7.35
7.92
7.00
6.40
2.46
2.77
2.75
0.00
183.4
49.0
48.3
38.1
288.5
37-3
26.0
0.0
f\
1.27
1.17
1.28
0.40
t 01
1.«
0.8'
0.9'
o.oo
0.9*
EMISSION RESULTS ARE : HC PPM HEXANE , CO MOLE % ,NOX PPM , 02 %
3-348
-------
TABLE 21 CONT'D
OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON ALL FAILED
u VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE
MODE : IDLE (D)
DENVER
1972 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 111 VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
VEHICLE
MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL
IMPORTS
NO. OF
2
1
6
8
MOTORS
CYL.
1
9
10
14
2
0
4
5
27
MEAN
190.0
291-7
343.5
310.7
240.0
466.2
217.0
301.1
HC
S.
0
347
297
140
63
450
33
223
D.
.0
.7
.0
.1
.6
.7
.8
.8
CO
MEAN S.D.
2.60
1.53
2.28
2.13
1.60
2.35
2.63
1.84
0.00
1.92
1.43
2.06
1.84
1.55
0.74
1.93
NOX
MEAN S.D.
136.4
86.0
98.1
133-5
108.6
94.1
122.6
110.7
0.0
36.0
32.6
74.7
10.7
21.4
39.7
61.4
02
MEAN S.D.
0.50
1.84
0.96
1.84
0.80
0.80
0.58
1.78
0.00
1.35
0.97
1.30
0.71
0.58
0.38
1.29
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 -
251 -
250
350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA
1800 -
2800 .
3800 .
llOnn
1800 -
WEIGHT
2799
3799
4799
5799
4
4
16
12
6
16
13
1
466.2
223.7
330.0
253-3
387.5
337.8
240.8
220.0
450
35
264
142
370
263
132
0
• 7
.0
.7
.1
.7
.5
.8
.0
2.35
2.64
2.03
1.64
2.63
2.18
1.64
0.20
1.55
0.86
1.96
1.88
1.34
1.91
1.79
0.00
94.1
119-2
116.1
105.5
103-2
109.4
110.7
169-2
21.4
45.0
52.5
71.7
23.7
56.5
66.6
0.0
0.80
0.60
1.70
1.77
0.72
1.72
1.59
1.50
0.58
0.43
0.89
1.73
0.47
1.06
1.60
0.00
ALL VEHICLES 36
RESULTS ARE
307.8 242.5 2.00 1.77 110.5 55-5 1-50 1.23
: HC PPM HEXANE , CO MOLE % ,NOX PPM , 02 %
3-349
-------
TABLE 21 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST PROCEDURE EXHAUST EMISSION
bUMMAiti ur uwbiutb A^ FAILED VEHICLES
MODE : IDLE (D)
DENVER
1972 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 111 VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
VEHICLE
MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL
IMPORTS
NO. OF
2
4
6
8
MOTORS
CYL.
1
9
10
14
2
0
4
5
27
HC
IMPR JIMPR
1810.
288.
326.
190.
215.
72.
697.
258.
0
3
0
7
0
5
0
9
90.5
49.7
48.7
38.0
47.3
13.5
76.3
46.2
CO
IMPR $IMPR
6.00
6.43
3-70
5.99
5.75
4.02
6.33
5.50
69.77
80.77
61.87
73.79
78.23
63.14
70.65
74.95
NOX
IMPR JIMPR
-82.3
-46.9
38.7
-87.2
-44.5
-25.5
74.8
-62.9
-152.0
-120.0
28.3
-188.4
-69-3
-37-1
37.9
-131.8
IMPR
3-60
-0.76
0.06
-0.57
-0.05
-0.02
0.82
-0.51
02
r*nrfl
87.80
-69.35
5.88
-W.J»
-6.6?
-3-23
58.5?
J*.W
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 -
251 -
250
350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA
1800 -
2800 -
3800 -
4800 -
WEIGHT
2799
3799
4799
5799
4
4
16
12
6
16
13
1
72.
418.
333.
288.
448.
275.
273.
120.
5
7
7
3
3
3
1
0
13.5
65.2
50.3
53.2
53.6
44.9
53.1
35.3
4.02
6.41
6.12
4.71
4.72
5.75
5-36
6.20
63.14
70.86
75.08
74.15
64.17
72.52
76.59
96.87
-25.5
114.0
-67.6
-58.3
80.2
-60.4
-62.4
-131.1
-37.1
48.9
-139.2
-123.7
43.7
-123-2
-129-2
-344.4
-0.02
0.13
-0.36
-0.15
0.55
-0.56
-0.31
-1.10
-3.23
17.2»
-26.51
-30
43-0
JI7.55
Jfi*
i te
ALL VEHICLES 36 299.0 49.3 5-45 73.11 -39.7 -56.0 -0-30 -z'
EMISSION RESULTS ARE : HC PPM HEXANE , CO MOLE % ,NOX PPM , 02 %
3-350
-------
TABLE 21 CONT'D
OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON ALL FAILED
u VEHICLES BEFORE MAINTENANCE
MODE : IDLE (N)
DENVER
1972 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 111 VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
NO. OF CYL.
2
4
6
8
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 - 250
251 - 350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799
2800 . 3799
3800 - 4799
48o° - 5799
2
10
14
16
8
0
14
8
28
14
7
17
12
17
19
13
1
MEAN
1235
607
660
651
421
516
731
661
516
550
745
652
617
690
583
400
.0
.0
.7
.9
.9
.1
.9
.2
.1
.7
.9
.9
.9
.0
.1
.0
HC
S.
1081
520
498
386
127
216
652
487
216
435
591
476
434
503
462
0
D.
.9
.4
.3
.5
.9
.2
.0
.6
.2
.5
.0
.9
.5
.4
.0
.0
CO
MEAN S.D.
6.80
7-91
5-50
7.86
7.56
7.22
7.19
7.05
7.22
6.99
7.71
6.25
6.98
7.38
6.90
7.40
2.55
2.12
3.69
2.37
1.68
2.42
2.94
3.01
2.42
3.12
2.80
3.11
2.79
3.05
2.68
0.00
NOX
MEAN S.D.
51.1
34.9
49.3
35.6
52.1
55.1
45.5
35.4
55.1
46.2
36.0
35.1
50.3
41.0
35.1
37.1
15.6
17.9
20.5
13-1
21.5
19.2
20.9
14.6
19.2
22.5
15.2
13-6
15.9
22.7
13.3
0.0
02
MEAN S.D.
2.60
1.12
1.42
1.51
0.52
0.96
1.36
1.44
0.96
0.99
1.65
1.36
1.15
1.48
1.28
0.40
1.98
0.60
1.46
1.63
0.26
1.07
1.26
1.45
1.07
0.73
1.79
1.00
1.21
1.62
1.00
0.00
VEHICLES 50
RESULTS ARE
631-9 458.4 7.12 2.79 42.5 18.8 1.29 1.32
: HC PPM HEXANE , CO MOLE % ,NOX PPM , 02 %
3-351
-------
TABLE 21 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF FEDERAL ™B»*ng PROCEDUR^RESULTS 0. ALL FAILED
MODE : IDLE (N)
DENVER
1972 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 111 VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
VEHICLE
MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL
IMPORTS
NO. OF
2
4
6
8
MOTORS
CYL.
2
10
14
16
8
0
14
8
28
HC
MEAN S.D.
230.0
311.5
270.0
298.4
308.1
347.1
170.6
298.9
113
305
262
310
118
243
68
294
.1
.4
.9
.4
.9
.8
.5
.9
C
MEAN
4.00
1.65
2.62
2.75
3.76
3.75
2.59
2.22
0
S.D.
2.55
2.21
1.38
1.98
2.95
2.34
1.57
2.00
NOX
MEAN S.D.
78.7
58.5
61.4
61.8
64.7
62.0
70.4
59.9
24.8
16.5
19.0
42.7
30.8
28.5
21.4
32.2
02
MEAN S.D.
0.70
1.73
0.81
1.63
1.02
0.90
0.79
1.62
**"
0.11
1-32
O.G2
1.38
0.9!
0.15
0.3?
1.33
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 -
251 -
250
350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA
1800 -
2800 -
3800 -
4800 -
WEIGHT
2799
3799
4799
5799
14
7
17
12
17
19
13
1
347.1
173-6
298.5
287.1
314.7
303.7
257.3
130.0
243
73
343
210
234
321
207
0
.8
.4
.0
.4
.9
.8
.4
.0
3.75
2.64
2.39
1.97
3.48
2.61
1.97
1.00
2.34
1.69
1.98
1.99
2.24
2.04
1.89
o;oo
62.0
66.7
56.6
67.6
63.1
58.8
65.8
62.1
28.5
20.2
13-1
48.3
28.4
12.9
46.7
0.0
0.90
0.81
1.59
1.59
0.80
1.65
1.46
0.50
0.15
0.35
1.03
1.H
0,8
0.91
1.65
A Afl
0.011
ALL VEHICLES 50
EMISSION RESULTS ARE
291.9 260.1 2.71 2.11 62.2 29-5
: HC PPM HEXANE , CO MOLE % ,NOX PPM , 02
3-352
1.29
-------
TABLE 21 CONT'D
OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST PROCEDURE EXHAUST EMISSION REDUCTIONS
ur 0N ALL FAILED VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE
MODE : IDLE (N)
DENVER
1972 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 111 VEHICLES
N(
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
NO. OF CYL.
2
H
6
8
DISPLACEMENT
LESS THAN 151
151 - 250
251 - 350
MORE THAN 350
INERTIA WEIGHT
1800 - 2799
2800 - 3799
joOO - 47QQ
"800 . 5?99
ALL VEHICLES
^SSION RESULT^
D. OF
VEH
2
10
14
16
8
0
14
8
28
14
7
17
12
17
19
13
1
50
5 ARE
IMF
1005.
295.
390.
353.
113.
168.
561.
362.
168.
377.
447.
365.
303.
386.
325.
270.
340.
: HC P
H
'R
0
5
7
4
7
9
2
3
9
1
4
8
2
3
8
0
0
PM
!C
5&IMPR
81.4
48.7
59.1
54.2
27.0
32.7
76.7
54.8
32.7
68.5
60.0
56.0
49.1
56.0
55.9
67.5
53.8
HEYANE
(
IMPR
2.80
6.26
2.88
5.12
3.80
3.47
4.60
4.83
3.47
4.34
5.32
4.27
3.51
4.77
4.93
6.40
4.41
nn Mnr.u
:o
%I
41
79
52
65
50
48
64
68
48
62
68
68
50
64
71
86
62
: 1
MPR
.18
.13
.30
.06
.25
.07
.00
.54
.07
.17
.99
.45
.21
.63
.46
.49
.00
wnY
Ni
IMPR
-27.6
-23.6
-12.1
-26.2
-12.6
-6.9
-24.9
-24.5
-6.9
-20.5
-20.6
-32.5
-12.9
-17.8
-30.6
-25.1
-19-6
PPM r
3X
-53-9
-67.8
-24.5
-73-6
-24.2
-12.5
-54.8
-69-0
-12.5
-44.3
-57.4
-92.7
-25.6
-43-5
-87.1
-67.6
-46.1
IP 1
IMPR
1.90
-0.61
0.61
-0.12
-0.50
0.06
0.57
-0.18
0.06
0.17
0.06
-0.23
0.35
-0.16
-0.18
-0.10
0.01
02
JIMPR
73-08
-54.46
42.71
-7.85
-95.24
5-97
42.20
-12.62
5.97
17.39
3.91
-17.18
30.26
-10.99
-14.46
-25.00
0.46
3-353
-------
TABLE 21 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON PHASE 1
SUMMAR CATALYTIC CONVERTER EQUIPPED VEHICLES BEFORE MAINTENANCE
DENVER
MODE : 50 MPH
1975 & 1976 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 112 VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
ALL VEHICLES
HC CO
MEAN S.D. MEAN S.D.
NOX
MEAN S.D.
02
MEAN S.D.
BEFORE CONVERTER
2
5
19
27
4
57
72
89
80
108
102
95
.5
.0
.6
.7
.5
.6
24
36
45
48
60
47
.7
.0
.9
.7
.8
.6
AFTER
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
ALL VEHICLES
2
5
19
27
4
57
45
64
47
86
83
69
.0
.0
.0
.9
.7
.5
21
40
41
46
63
47
.2
.1
.2
.6
.2
.4
0.88
1.09
2.45
2.23
3.52
2.25
0.04
0.71
1.40
1.26
2.12
1.40
1707.3
1458.3
806.9
959.4
631.7
953.0
1386.5
255.4
394.0
375.1
173.1
461.4
3.55
2.44
3.04
1.44
3.47
2.29
0.0?
1.93
1.81
1.51
1.71
1.80
CONVERTER
0.07
1.07
0.99
1.96
3.04
1.55
0.04
0.74
1.19
1.54
2.83
1.57
1827.3
1237.9
744.1
879.6
693.7
883.6
1498.3
416.6
400.2
367.8
290.1
471.9
2.40
1.86
2.26
1.08
1.57
1.64
0.85
1.65
1.91
1,21
1.61
1.60
SUMMARY OF AFTER CONVERTER EXHAUST EMISSION REDUCTIONS
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
ALL VEHICLES
HC
2
5
19
27
4
57
IMPR
27.5
25.0
33.6
21.9
18.8
26.2
56IMPR
37.9
28.1
41.7
20.1
18.3
27.3
CO
IMPR
0.81
0.02
1.47
0.28
0.49
0.70
SIMPR
92.00
1.47
59.80
12.46
13.83
31.00
NOX
IMPR
-120.0
220.5
62.8
79.7
-62.0
69.4
JIMPR
-7.0
15.1
7.8
8.3
-9.8
7.3
_.„,. «TU>!
IMPR
1.15
0.58
0.78
n it
0.3&
1.90
0.66
32.35
23.T?
25.62
25.13
tjt 'J
54.68
28.10
EMISSION RESULTS ARE : HC PPM HEXANE . CO MOLE % .NOX PPM . 02 %
3-354
-------
TABLE 21 CONT'D
FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON PHASE 1 PASSED
CONvERTER EQUIPPED VEHICLES BEFORE MAINTENANCE
DENVER
MODE : 30 MPH
1975 & 1976 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 112 VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
ALL VEHICLES
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
ALL VEHICLES
HC CO
MEAN S.D. MEAN S.D.
NOX
MEAN S .
D.
MEAN
02
S.D.
BEFORE CONVERTER
2
5
19
27
4
57
2
5
19
27
4
57
SUMMARY
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
Ar t
^VEHICLES
ASSIGN RESULTS
2
5
19
27
57
'ARE :
110.
135.
114.
120.
122.
119.
55.
109.
57.
77.
102.
74.
0
0
9
6
5
6
0
0
9
2
5
3
OF AFTER
IMPR
55.0
26.0
57.0
43.3
20.0
45.3
HC I
HC
14.1
49.4
72.0
48.3
59.1
56.4
AFTER
21.2
78.9
55.6
60.5
101.8
63.0
CONVERTER
0.75
1.65
3.18
1.52
4.12
2.26
0.21
1.19
1.76
1.16
2.19
1.71
1320.2
784.3
232.5
690.0
416.4
543.3
1230
121
129
569
296
507
.0
.5
.9
.8
.7
.4
4.70
3.08
3.33
2.03
4.32
2.82
0.42
2.58
2.18
1.78
3.07
2.16
CONVERTER
0.04
1.12
1.44
1.19
2.75
1.34
0.01
1.05
1.68
1.39
3.30
1.64
1417.6
731.0
248.2
613.9
405.3
511.2
1338
193
164
471
278
460
.7
.7
.5
.7
.2
.2
3.35
1.98
2.53
1.37
1.95
1.93
0.78
1.61
2.61
1.64
2.01
2.06
EXHAUST EMISSION REDUCTIONS
CO
*IMPR IMPR
50.0 0.70
PPM
19.3 0
49.6 1
35.9 0
16.3 1
37.9 0
HFYANE . I
.53
.74
.33
.38
.92
m MDT
5&IMPR
94.00
32.12
54.75
21.77
33.33
40.76
.E * Nf
NOX
IMPR
-97.3
53.2
-15.6
76.2
11.1
32.1
W PPM
JIMPR
-7.4
6
-6
11
2
5
. 0? 1
.8
.7
.0
.7
.9
I
IMPR
1.35
1.10
0.80
0.66
2.37
0.89
02
*IMPR
28.72
35.71
23.87
32.60
54.91
31.48
3-355
-------
TABLE 21 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON PHASE 1
CATALYTIC CONVERTER EQUIPPED VEHICLES BEFORE MAINTENANCE
DENVER
MODE : IDLE(D)
1975 & 1976 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 112 VEHICLES
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
ALL VEHICLES
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
ALL VEHICLES
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
ALL VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
HC
MEAN S.
CO
D . MEAN S
.D.
NOX
MEAN S.D.
02
MEAN s,D,
BEFORE CONVERTER
2
4
15
27
2
50
2
4
15
27
2
50
SUMMARY
2
4
15
27
2
50
135.
583.
173.
291.
110.
263.
52.
152.
117.
83.
95.
98.
0
7
1
3
0
9
5
5
5
0
0
5
OF AFTER
IMPR
82.5
431.2
55.6
208.3
15.0
165.4
14
878
93
353
42
356
24
105
106
76
21
87
.1
.8
.7
.2
.4
.0
AFTER
.7
.3
.9
.3
.2
.8
CONVERTER
1.75
1.62
3.93
1.35
4.15
2.31
0
1
2
1
1
2
.92
.02
.24
.42
.91
.06
137.2
90.4
59.0
233.0
29.6
155.5
134.5
40.2
32.1
178.8
20.5
156.9
5.40 1.1]
3.97 3.H
3.62 3.2]
3.20 2.35
7.70 2.63
3.66 2.18
CONVERTER
0.04
0.67
2.15
0.58
3.05
1.16
0
0
2
1
0
1
EXHAUST
HC CO
*IMPR IMPR $11
61.1 1.71 97
73.
32.
71.
13.
62.
9 0
1 1
5 0
6 1
7 1
.95
.78
.77
.10
.15
58
45
56
26
49
.01
.78
.84
.17
.35
.97
134.1
74.6
72.5
188.7
28.6
134.9
96.1
26.5
33.8
146.9
27.6
123.9
3.75 1.2;
2.90 Ul
3.59 3.63
2.19 2.21
3.15 U
2.78 2,11
EMISSION REDUCTIONS
tf>R
.71
.62
.26
.88
.51
.84
NOX
IMPR *IMPR
3.1 2.3
15.8
-13.5
44.3
1.0
20.6
17.5
-22.9
19.0
3.4
13.3
02
ffi 8
1.07 2?'0i
0.03 ^
1.01 SI*
4.55 59-05
0.87 &51
EMISSION RESULTS ARE : HC PPM HEXANE . CO MOLE % .NOX PPM . 02 %
3-356
-------
TABLE 21 CONT'D
FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON PHASE 1 PASSED
CONvERTER EQUIPPED VEHICLES BEFORE MAINTENANCE
DENVER
MODE : IDLE(N)
1975 & 1976 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 112 VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
ALL VEHICLES
HC CO
MEAN S.D. MEAN S.D.
NOX
MEAN S.D.
MEAN
02
S.D.
BEFORE CONVERTER
2
5
19
27
4
57
95.
491.
99.
401.
126.
275.
0
0
5
5
7
6
7.
845.
52.
547.
120.
462.
1
3
7
1
0
1
AFTER
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
ALL VEHICLES
2
5
19
27
4
57
SUMMARY
44.
90.
58.
82.
94.
74.
0
0
0
5
2
2
OF AFTER
8.
78.
47.
68.
130.
66.
5
5
2
9
6
7
CONVERTER
HC
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
Al t
*"• VEHICLES
ASSIGN RESULTS-
2
5
19
27
i
4
57
ARE :
IMPR
51.0
401.0
41.5
319.0
32.5
201.4
HC 1
?PM
5&IMPR
53.7
81.7
41.7
79.5
25.6
73.1
HEXAl
0.97
1.93
2.40
1.35
3.14
1.87
0.74
1.10
2.11
1.40
3.54
1.87
40.6
54.1
27.4
63.3
37.3
47.6
17.7
17.9
17.8
29.7
16.1
28.7
6.50
4.36
5.33
3.55
5.25
4.45
1.70
2.99
3.46
2.65
3.65
3.07
CONVERTER
0.04
1.32
0.55
0.59
2.18
0.73
0.01
1.72
1.18
1.15
3.76
1.50
56.6
50.7
41.5
65.5
47.1
54.4
12.0
15.0
8.8
33.0
12.5
25.9
5.10
2.46
5.56
2.60
3.62
3.77
1.27
1.76
3.49
2.90
2.55
3.23
EXHAUST EMISSION REDUCTIONS
CO
IMPR
0.93
0
1
0
0
1
MR . i
.61
.85
.76
.96
.14
nn MDT
*IMPR
95.90
31.81
77.17
56.23
30.44
61.05
.R
-------
TABLE 21 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON PHASE 1
5UMMAH CATALYTIC CONVERTER EQUIPPED VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
MODE : 50 MPH
1975 & 1976 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 112 VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
ALL VEHICLES
HC
MEAN S.D.
CO
MEAN S.D.
NOX
MEAN S.D.
02
MEAN S.D.
BEFORE CONVERTER
2
5
19
27
4
57
80
88
66
96
101
85
.0
.0
.4
.9
.2
.3
28
36
54
44
67
49
.3
.8
.4
.6
.1
.4
0.91
1.29
2.12
2.26
3.80
2.19
0.01
1.13
1.40
1.18
1.16
1.33
1757.1
1255.4
692.6
900.5
963.9
893.3
1456.9
517.2
356.6
M13.3
347.1
484.6
3.60
2.48
3.28
1.31
2.47
2.25
0.95
1.55
1.65
1.38
1.68
UJ
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
ALL VEHICLES
2
5
19
27
4
57
45.0
57.0
32.9
75.7
82.5
58.8
7.1
41.8
27.0
47.0
70.9
45.4
AFTER CONVERTER
0.05 0.07 1712.4 1379.3 2.30 0,H
1.14 1.36 858.0 475.8 2,02 1.75
0.72 0.91 661.4 374.1 2.45 1.W
2.02 1.73 845.1 384.0 0.83 Oj
3.20 2.26 984.5 382.4 1.00 0.62
1.51 1.64 822.4 458.2 1.56 1.#
SUMMARY OF AFTER CONVERTER EXHAUST EMISSION REDUCTIONS
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
ALL VEHICLES
HC
2
5
19
27
4
57
IMPR
35.0
31.0
33.5
21.1
18.8
26.6
*IMPR
43.8
35.2
50.5
21.8
18.5
31.1
CO
IMPR
0.86
0.15
1.40
0.23
0.60
0.68
94.23
11.94
66.21
10.39
15.79
30.96
NOX
IMPR
44.7
397.4
31.2
55.4
-20.6
70.9
JIMPR
2.5
3^.7
4.5
6.2
-2.1
7.9
u
IMPR
1.30
0.46
0.83
0.49
1.47
0.70
i
36J1
10.55
/ fA
36.50
59.0
30.55
EMISSION RESULTS ARE : HC PPM HEXANE . CO MOLE % .NOX PPM . 02 %
3-358
-------
TABLE 21 CONT'D
,UABY OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON PHASE 1 PASSED
SUMMARYJJ£J^r CONVERTER EQUIPPED VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
MODE : 30 MPH
1975 & 1976 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 112 VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
ALL VEHICLES
HC CO
MEAN S.D. MEAN S.D.
NOX
MEAN S.D.
MEAN
02
S.D.
BEFORE CONVERTER
2
5
19
27
4
57
125.
114.
95.
105.
126.
104.
0
0
7
4
2
9
21.
48.
68.
44.
116.
58.
2
3
4
2
3
5
AFTER
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
ALL VEHICLES
2
5
19
27
4
57
SUMMARY
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
^ VEHICLES
2
5
19
27
4
57
60.
71.
50.
69.
103.
65.
0
0
5
4
7
1
OF AFTER
IMPR
65.0
43.0
45.2
35.9
22.5
39.8
0.
58.
50.
49.
132.
57.
0
6
0
7
9
6
CONVERTER
HC
JIMPR
52.0
. 37.7
47.3
34.1
17.8
38.0
0.60
1.26
3.07
1.30
4.25
2.09
0.13
0.76
1.83
1.00
2.22
1.72
1321.0
709.3
233.6
656.0
412.2
521.0
1158.6
286.2
143.3
552.0
353.2
495.7
4.10
2.60
3.44
1.90
2.30
2.60
0.71
1.91
1.95
1.83
2.13
1.97
CONVERTER
0.02
1.19
1.22
1.16
1.47
1.16
0.02
1.50
1.93
1.31
0.50
1.50
1340.7
483.7
217.9
593.3
398.8
466.7
1201.1
295.2
125.9
423.3
280.8
423.1
3.00
1.66
2.46
1.14
0.67
1.68
0.28
1.57
1.97
1.43
0.46
1.70
EXHAUST EMISSION REDUCTIONS
CO
IMPR JIMPR
0.58 96.28
0.07 5.56
1.86 60.42
0
2
0
.15
.78
.93
11.30
65.29
44.34
NOX
IMPR ZIMPR
-19.8 -1.5
225.6 31.8
15.7 6.7
62.7
13.4
54.3
9.6
3.2
10.4
IMPR
1.10
0.94
0.97
0.76
1.62
0.92
02
$IMPR
26.83
36.15
28.34
39.88
70.65
35.46
ON RESULTS' ARE : HC PPM HEXANE . co MOLE % .NOX PPM . 02 %
3-359
-------
TABLE 21 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON PHASE 1 PA on*
bUMM CATALYTIC CONVERTER EQUIPPED VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE ASSED
DENVER
MODE : IDLE(D)
1975 & 1976 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 112 VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
ALL VEHICLES
MEAN
HC
S.D.
CO
MEAN S.D.
NOX
MEAN S.D.
02
MEAN S.D,
BEFORE CONVERTER
2
4
15
27
2
50
190
97
108
178
625
168
.0
.5
.4
.3
.0
.0
14
42
53
65
742
155
.1
.5
.1
.9
.5
.6
1.92
0.60
2.56
0.71
4.75
1.49
1.80
0.60
1.32
0.77
4.88
1.61
76.7
108.3
83.6
251.7
32.1
172.2
12.0
34.5
40.1
244.7
9.9
197.7
4.45
3.40
4.35
3.31
4.55
3.74
0,21
2,38
2.72
2.35
1,91
2,tt
AMER. MOTORS 2
CHRYSLER 4
FORD 15
GENERAL MOTORS 27
IMPORTS 2
ALL VEHICLES 50
AFTER CONVERTER
70.0 14.1 0.02 0.02
61.2 73.5 0.36 0.63
55.3 40.5 0.74 1.31
54.1 51.3 0.18 0.44
740.0 933.4 4.07 5.27
82.5 194.0 0.52 1.34
84
92
107
194
17
147
.2
.8
.6
.3
.5
.9
8
40
77
145
7
125
.5
.4
.5
.3
.8
.0
3
4
4
2
3
3
.40
.15
.27
.36
.05
.17
1,M
3.92
3.01
2.K
U!
2,»
SUMMARY OF AFTER CONVERTER EXHAUST EMISSION REDUCTIONS
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
ALL VEHICLES
2
4
15
27
2
50
IMPR
120
36
53
124
-115
85
.0
.2
.1
.3
.0
.5
HC
JIMPR
63.2
37.2
49.0
69.7
-18.4
50.9
IMPR
1.91
0.24
1.83
0.52
0.68
0.97
CO
ZIMPR
99
40
71
73
14
65
.09
.42
.27
.87
.21
.21
NOX
IMPR *IMPR
-7
15
-24
57
14
24
.5
.5
.1
.4
.5
.3
-9.B
14.3
-28.8
22.8
45.3
14.1
IMPR
InC
.05
-0.75
0.08
0.95
1.50
0.57
°H'
-22.0
1.»
28,0
32.91
15.2
EMISSION RESULTS ARE : HC PPM HEXANE . CO MOLE % ,NOX PPM . 02 %
3-360
-------
TABLE 21 CONT'D
miuiRY OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON PHASE 1 PASSED
SOMMARI W *$gc CONVERTER EQUIPPED VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
MODE : IDLE(N)
1975 & 1976 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 112 VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
ALL VEHICLES
HC CO
MEAN S.D. MEAN S.D.
NOX
MEAN S.D.
MEAN
02
S.D.
BEFORE CONVERTER
2
5
19
27
4
57
160.
96.
67.
238.
242.
164.
0
0
2
5
5
7
28.
22.
33.
225.
195.
180.
3
7
5
9
7
2
AFTER
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
ALL VEHICLES
2
5
19
27
4
57
SUMMARY
AMSR. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
ir *
*"• VEHICLES
2
5
19
27
57
72.
69.
40.
67.
210.
68.
5
0
6
4
0
3
OF AFTER
Qn f
Of .5
27.0
26.7
171.1
32.5
96.4
HC
17.
58.
29.
68.
236.
85.
7
4
1
7
9
5
CONVERTER
0.94
1.33
1.50
0.73
4.01
1.28
0.51
1.43
1.11
0.64
3.03
1.39
40.1
56.3
31.7
58.2
29.8
46.3
5.7
14.0
14.6
19.0
15.7
20.8
5.10
3.92
6.28
3.59
3.95
4.62
0.28
2.96
2.78
2.74
2.43
2.91
CONVERTER
0(02
0.97
0.39
0.26
2.70
0.53
0.02
1.46
1.06
0.55
3.45
1.30
50.6
53.5
48.9
57.9
44.3
53.2
3.5
19.2
12.1
24.0
23.3
19.7
4.45
2.54
6.37
2.70
2.70
4.01
1.20
1.84
2.70
2.64
1.89
3.03
EXHAUST EMISSION REDUCTIONS
CO
?IMPR
54.7
28.1
39.6
71.7
13.4
58.5
IMPR
0.92
0
1
0
1
0
.36
.11
.47
.31
.76
2IMPR
98.14
27.22
74.03
64.47
32.65
58.98
NOX
IMPR
-10.5
2.8
-17.2
0.4
-14.5
-6.9
*IMPR
-26.3
5.0
-54.4
0.6
-48.7
-14.9
IMPR
0.65
1.38
-0.09
0.89
1.25
0.61
02
JIMPR
12.75
35.20
-1.43
24.69
31.65
13.17
EMISSION
RESULTS'ARE : HC PPM HEXANE . CO MOLE % .NOX PPM . 02 %
3-361
-------
TABLE 21 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON ALL PHASP
b CATALYTIC CONVERTER EQUIPPED VEHICLES BEFORE MAINTENANCE
DENVER
MODE : 50 MPH
1975 & 1976 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 112 VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
ALL VEHICLES
HC
MEAN S.D.
CO
MEAN S.D.
NOX
MEAN S.D.
02
MEAN S.D,
BEFORE CONVERTER
2
15
24
39
6
86
72.5
110.0
93.7
111.4
141.4
107.6
24
35
59
49
65
52
.7
.4
.5
.6
.4
.3
0.88
2.16
2.56
2.45
4.41
2.55
0.04
1.39
1.73
1.34
1.88
1.60
1707.3
1169.2
831.3
902.3
608.1
922.5
1386
550
417
375
178
466
.5
.8
.9
.2
.4
.9
3.55
2.11
2.95
1.22
2.63
2.03
0.01
U5
1.80
1.31
UJ
Ul
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
ALL VEHICLES
2
15
24
39
6
86
45.0
93.3
57.6
89.5
133.6
83.6
21.2
49.5
51.3
52.8
78.5
56.8
AFTER CONVERTER
0.07 0.04 1827.3 1498.3 2.10 0.85
2.29 1.77 1024.9 501.3 1.40 1,73
1.20 1.68 773.3 421.6 2.13 1.75
2.20 1.68 793.6 379.7 0.64 1,10
4.25 2.54 628.9 268.9 1.60 1.51
2.04 1.92 837.7 466.2 1.10 1.5*
SUMMARY OF AFTER CONVERTER EXHAUST EMISSION REDUCTIONS
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
ALL VEHICLES
HC
CO
NOX
2
15
24
39
6
86
IMPR
27.5
16.7
36.1
21.9
7.9
24.1
$IMPR
37.9
15.2
38.5
19.7
5.6
22.4
IMPR
0.81
-0.13
1.36
0.26
0.16
0.51
*IMPR
92.00
-6.01
53.15
10.53
3.72
19.96
IMPR
-120.0
144.3
58.0
108.7
-20.8
84.9
JIMPR
-7.0
12.3
7.0
12.0
-3.4
9.2
IMPK
1.15
0.71
0.82
0.38
1.03
0.63
#35
¥••
33.75
27.91
31,«
39-1:
31.2
EMISSION RESULTS ARE : HC PPM HEXANE . CO MOLE % ,NOX PPM . 02 %
3-362
-------
TABLE 21 CONT'D
nF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON ALL PHASE 1
CATALYTIC CONVERTER EQUIPPED VEHICLES BEFORE MAINTENANCE
DENVER
MODE : 30 MPH
1975 & 1976 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 112 VEHICLES
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
NO. OF
VEH
HC CO
MEAN S.D. MEAN S.D.
NOX
MEAN S.
D.
MEAN
02
S.D.
BEFORE CONVERTER
2
15
24
GENERAL MOTORS 39
IMPORTS
ALL VEHICLES
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
ALL VEHICLES
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
^ VEHICLES
6
86
2
15
24
39
6
86
SUMMARY
2
15
24
39
6
86
110.
148.
130.
128.
182.
136.
55.
127.
66.
89.
172.
95.
0
3
1
3
1
1
0
3
3
7
1
3
OF AFTER
IMPR
55.0
21.0
63.8
38.6
10.0
40.9
HC
14.1
56.3
91.6
48.8
96.9
69.0
AFTER
21.2
67.6
60.0
60.1
123.4
72.8
CONVERTER
0.75
1.87
3.31
1.90
5.17
2.53
0.21
1.01
1.93
1.47
2.98
1.95
1320.2
953.5
239.7
625.2
386.8
568.5
1230
390
139
513
272
491
.0
.6
.9
.5
.4
.3
4.70
2.42
3.20
1.68
3.23
2.43
0.42
2.26
2.15
1.61
2.77
2.09
CONVERTER
0.04
1.67
1.59
1.66
4.44
1.82
0.01
1.16
2.03
1.67
3.84
2.06
1417.6
939.8
259.3
530.0
371.4
530.5
1338
416
179
433
256
462
.7
.4
.5
.5
.9
.8
3.35
1.41
2.32
1.01
1.84
1.57
0.78
1.69
2.43
1.46
1.81
1.91
EXHAUST EMISSION REDUCTIONS
CO
JIMPR IMPR
50.0 0.70
14.2 0
49.0 1
30.1 0
5.5 0
30.0 0
.20
.72
.25
.73
.71
56IMPR
94.00
10.70
52.10
12.90
14.09
27.93
NOX
IMPR
-97.3
13.7
-19.6
95.2
15.4
38.0
JIMPR
-7.4
1
-8
15
4
.4
.2
.2
.0
6.7
IMPR
1.35
1.01
0.88
0.67
1.39
0.86
02
56IMPR
28.72
41.60
27.41
39.79
42.92
35.31
RESULTS ARE : HC PPM HEXANE . CO MOLE % ,NOX PPM , 02 %
3-363
-------
TABLE 21 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON ALL PHASE
bUMMfl CATALYTIC CONVERTER EQUIPPED VEHICLES BEFORE MAINTENANCE
DENVER
MODE : IDLE(D)
1975 & 1976 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 112 VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
ALL VEHICLES
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
ALL VEHICLES
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
ALL VEHICLES
HC CO
MEAN S.D. MEAN S.D.
NOX
MEAN S.D.
MEAN
02
S.D.
BEFORE CONVERTER
2
14
20
37
3
76
2
14
20
37
3
76
SUMMARY
2
14
20
37
3
76
135.
345.
281.
297.
191.
292.
52.
241.
171.
141.
183.
167.
0
2
0
4
2
0
5
1
4
5
7
3
OF AFTER
IMPR
82.5
104.1
109.5
155.9
7.5
124.7
HC
14.1
455.9
352.0
303.3
97.2
335.2
AFTER
24.7
111.4
177.1
139.2
103.2
146.3
CONVERTER
1.75
3.74
4.62
2.33
6.17
3.38
0.92
2.29
2.75
2.44
2.59
2.71
137.2
72.4
52.7
200.3
60.6
128.8
134
32
32
172
38
139
.5
.9
.0
.8
.5
.8
5.40
2.68
3.50
2.63
4.32
3.03
1.13
2.66
3.01
2.26
4,21
2.6?
CONVERTER
0.04
3.68
3.17
1.80
5.70
2.66
0.01
2.61
3.54
2.68
3.07
3.07
134.1
63.8
63.9
155.2
57.9
108.7
96
24
36
144
38
111
.1
.7
.5
.2
.5
.6
3.75
1.79
3.01
1.69
1.97
2.13
1.20
1.85
3.10
2.10
2.18
2.52
EXHAUST EMISSION REDUCTIONS
CO
*IMPR IMPR
61.1 1.71
30.2 0
39.0 1
52.4 0
3.9 0
42.7 0
.06
.46
.54
.47
.72
NOX
5&IMPR
97.71
1.55
31.49
22.95
7.69
21.40
IMPR
3.1
8.5
-11.2
45.1
2.7
20.1
%m
2
11
-21
22
4
15
PR
.3
.8
.2
.5
.5
.6
IMPR
1.65
0.89
0.49
0.94
2.35
0.90
02
30.56
33.01
1H.01
35.87
0
29.7'
EMISSION RESULTS ARE : HC PPM HEXANE . CO MOLE % .NOX PPM . 02 %
3-364
-------
TABLE 21 CONT'D
OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON ALL PHASE 1
CATALYTIC CONVERTER EQUIPPED VEHICLES BEFORE MAINTENANCE
DENVER
MODE : IDLE(N)
1975 & 1976 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 112 VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
ALL VEHICLES
HC CO
MEAN S.D. MEAN S.D.
NOX
MEAN S.D.
MEAN
02
S.D.
BEFORE CONVERTER
2
15
24
39
6
86
95.
348.
160.
377.
161.
287.
0
0
8
6
0
3
7.
472.
212.
459.
109.
390.
1
8
2
1
0
3
AFTER
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
ALL VEHICLES
I
2
15
24
39
6
86
SUMMARY
AMSR. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
*"• VEHICLES
2
15
24
39
6
86
44.
222.
99.
154.
133.
146.
0
7
8
9
1
6
OF AFTER
IMPR
51.0
125.3
61.0
222.6
27.9
140.7
HC
8.
141.
133.
140.
111.
140.
5
5
8
9
3
0
CONVERTER
0.97
4.46
3.10
2.66
4.85
3.23
0.74
2.73
2.81
2.64
4.12
2.89
40.6
46.2
26.6
72.7
43.7
52.0
17.7
15.3
17.5
88.2
18.3
62.8
6.50
2.91
4.98
2.77
3.93
3.60
1.70
2.62
3.36
2.54
3.28
3.00
CONVERTER
0.04
4.29
1.42
2.06
4.12
2.38
0.01
2.94
2.41
2.72
4.09
2.95
56.6
45.9
39.2
53.9
51.0
48.2
12.0
14.5
12.7
33.7
14.1
25.1
5.10
1.69
4.99
1.91
2.96
2.90
1.27
1.79
3.62
2.62
2.31
3.10
EXHAUST EMISSION REDUCTIONS
CO
JIMPR
53.7
36.0
37.9
59.0
17.3
49.0
IMPR
0.93
0
1
0
0
0
.18
.67
.60
.73
.85
56IMPR
95.90
3.99
54.03
22.47
15.08
26.34
NOX
IMPR
-16.0
0.3
-12.7
18.7
-7.3
3.8
ZIMPR
-39.5
0.7
-47.7
25.8
-16.7
7.3
IMPR
1.40
1.22
-0.01
0.86
0.97
0.70
02
21.54
41.97
-0.16
31.14
24.73
19.36
KESULTSfARE
HC PPM HEXANE . CO MOLE % .NOX PPM . 02 %
3-365
-------
TABLE 21 CONT'D
SUMMARY
IY OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON ALL PHASF
CATALYTIC CONVERTER EQUIPPED VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
MODE : 50 MPH
1975 & 1976 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 112 VEHICLES
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
ALL VEHICLES
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
ALL VEHICLES
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
ALL VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
HC CO
MEAN S.D. MEAN S.D.
NOX
MEAN S.D.
MEAN
02
BEFORE CONVERTER
2
15
24
39
6
86
2
15
24
39
6
86
SUMMARY
2
15
24
39
6
86
80.0
100.7
76.1
104.5
119.3
96.4
45.0
78.0
43.9
82.3
87.9
70.2
OF AFTER
28
35
58
51
59
52
7
44
47
55
84
55
.3
.6
.1
.5
.8
.4
AFTER
.1
.7
.8
.0
.4
.5
CONVERTER
0.91
2.13
2.23
2.45
4.11
2.43
0.01
1.44
1.46
1.24
1.17
1.41
1757.1
1031.0
668.8
872.0
784.8
854.6
1456
524
337
398
334
460
.9
.5
.9
.9
.9
.3
3.60
1.76
3.10
1.17
3.13
2.03
0,99
U2
1.H
1.25
1.56
u
CONVERTER
0.05
2.19
1.00
2.27
3.09
1.91
0.07
1.82
1.46
1.65
2.74
1.82
1712.4
820.8
633.3
803.0
735.2
773.1
1379
410
352
373
412
427
.3
.4
.8
.6
.5
.6
2.30
1.05
2.31
0.63
1.43
1.28
0,1*
U2
1.80
0.81
0.80
1.15
EXHAUST EMISSION REDUCTIONS
HC CO
IMPR JIMPR IMPR 5HMPR
35.0 43.8 0.86 94.23
22.7
32.2
22.2
31.4
26.1
22.
42.
21.
26.
27.
5 -0
3 1
3 0
3 1
1 0
.06
.23
.18
.02
.52
-2.66
55.24
7.27
24.83
21.39
NOX
IMPR JIMPR
44.7 2.5
210.2
35.5
69.0
49.6
81.5
20
5
7
6
9
.4
.3
.9
.3
.5
IMPR
1.30
0.71
0.80
0.54
1.70
0.75
tffl
36.11
H0.53
H5.83
_/ frt
36.93
EMISSION RESULTS ARE : HC PPM HEXANE . CO MOLE % .NOX PPM . 02 %
3-366
-------
TABLE 21 CONT'D
OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON ALL PHASE 1
CATALYTIC CONVERTER EQUIPPED VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
MODE : 30 MPH
1975 & 1976 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 112 VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
ALL VEHICLES
HC CO
MEAN S.D. MEAN S.D.
NOX
MEAN S.D.
MEAN
02
S.D.
BEFORE CONVERTER
2
15
24
39
6
86
125.
123.
107.
119.
167.
120.
0
7
6
6
9
9
21.
49.
77.
55.
100.
65.
2
7
0
2
0
5
AFTER
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
ALL VEHICLES
2
15
24
39
6
86
SUMMARY
AME8. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
^ VEHICLES
2
15
24
39
6
86
60.
93.
63.
82.
108.
80.
0
0
4
4
6
4
OF AFTER
IMPR
65.0
30.7
44.2
37.2
59.3
40.5
HC
0.
63.
63.
56.
115.
65.
0
6
3
4
9
3
CONVERTER
0.60
1.54
3.24
1.65
5.29
2.35
0.13
0.79
1.93
1.30
2.06
1.87
1321.0
847.8
230.5
609.9
313.9
535.3
1158.6
350.1
157.5
506.9
280.7
473.1
4.10
1.83
3.23
1.59
3.29
2.29
0.71
1.62
1.91
1.72
1.96
1.91
CONVERTER
0.02
1.44
1.61
1.55
1.94
1.55
0.02
1.17
2.37
1.48
2.42
1.79
1340.7
682.5
219.5
524.2
323.8
467.3
1201.1
372.7
144.6
399.6
229.8
405.4
3.00
0.91
2.32
0.83
1.57
1.38
0.28
1.27
1.87
1.27
1.30
1.59
EXHAUST EMISSION REDUCTIONS
CO
ZIMPR
52.0
24.8
41.1
31.1
35.3
33.5
IMPR
0.58
0
1
0
3
0
.10
.63
.10
.34
.80
JIMPR
96.28
6.75
50.32
6.10
63.24
34.24
NOX
IMPR
-19.8
165.3
10.9
85.6
-9.9
68.0
JIMPR
-1.5
19.5
4.7
14.0
-3.1
12.7
IMPR
1.10
0.93
0.91
0.76
1.71
0.91
02
JIMPR
26.83
50.55
28.22
47.67
52.17
39.93
EMISSION
ARE
HC PPM HEXANE . CO MOLE % .NOX PPM . 02 %
3-367
-------
TABLE 21 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON ALL PHASF
bUMMA CATALYTIC CONVERTER EQUIPPED VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
MODE : IDLE(D)
1975 & 1976 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 112 VEHICLES
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
ALL VEHICLES
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
ALL VEHICLES
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
ALL VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
HC
MEAN S.
CO
D. MEAN S.D.
NOX
MEAN S.D.
02
MEAN S.D,
BEFORE CONVERTER
2
14
20
37
3
76
2
14
20
37
3
76
SUMMARY
2
14
20
37
3
76
190.0
130.4
125.0
191.5
385.0
172.5
70.0
95.0
72.1
75.9
408.7
95.3
OF AFTER
14
50
80
77
510
136
14
75
78
66
660
164
.1
.4
.5
.0
.8
.1
AFTER
.1
.9
.1
.3
.9
.6
CONVERTER
1.92
1.21
2.80
0.86
4.87
1.68
1.80
0.98
2.07
0.86
2.99
1.80
76.7
98.8
78.5
247.5
47.6
160.7
12
32
38
248
18
191
.0
.0
.0
.8
.9
.0
4.45
2.37
4.23
2.83
5.52
3.30
0.21
2.00
2.58
2.28
1.58
2.39
CONVERTER
0.02
1.00
1.19
0.51
2.06
0.85
0.02
1.14
2.39
0.93
3.83
1.69
84.2
75.3
99.2
175.9
47.3
128.2
8
33
69
134
34
110
.5
.6
.7
.5
.7
.4
3.40
1.99
4.25
1.98
4.17
2.74
1,M
2.82
3.33
2.02
2.75
2.75
EXHAUST EMISSION REDUCTIONS
HC CO
IMPR 56IMPR IMPR
120.0 63.2 1.91
35.4 27.1 0.20
52.9
115.5
-23.7
77.2
42.
60.
-6.
44.
3 1
3 0
2 2
8 0
.61
.35
.81
.83
99.09
16.92
57.59
41.12
57.64
49.55
NOX
IMPR frIMPR
-7.5 -9.8
23.5 23-8
-20.6
71.6
0.3
32.4
-26
28
0
20
.3
.9
.7
.2
(
IMPR
1.05
0.38
-0.02
0.84
1.35
0.56
rfTlAI}
ilrJll
15.*
01
25-83
/ A1
16.93
EMISSION RESULTS ARE : HC PPM HEXANE . CO MOLE % .NOX PPM . 02 %
3-368
-------
TABLE 21 CONT'D
,.«i*ov OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON ALL PHASE 1
SUMMA CATALYTIC CONVERTER EQUIPPED VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
MODE : IDLE(N)
1975 & 1976 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 112 VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
ALL VEHICLES
MEAN
HC CO
S.D. MEAN S.D.
NOX
MEAN S.D.
MEAN
02
S.D.
BEFORE CONVERTER
2
15
24
39
6
86
160.0
117.7
77.2
239.9
182.1
166.4
28.
34.
57.
215.
172.
169.
3
6
8
4
0
0
AFTER
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
ALL VEHICLES
2
15
24
39
6
86
SUMMARY
72.5
78.7
47.9
82.3
227.1
83.2
17.
56.
50.
67.
281.
103.
7
9
3
5
3
5
OF AFTER CONVERTER
HC
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
^ VEHICLES
2
15
24
39
6
86
IMPR
87.5
39.0
29.3
157.6
-45.0
83.2
5HMPR
54.7
33.1
38.0
65.7
-24.7
50.0
0.94
1.65
1.75
1.09
3.29
1.55
0.51
1.22
2.01
0.98
2.68
1.62
40
56
31
62
27
49
.1
.4
.5
.5
.3
.3
5.7
13.9
13.3
21.1
12.0
22.4
5.10
2.61
5.99
3.03
4.89
3.99
0.28
2.32
2.79
2.64
2.42
2.91
CONVERTER
0.02
1.09
0.70
0.68
2.75
0.90
0.02
1.33
2.06
1.05
3.70
1.80
50
42
48
55
41
49
EXHAUST EMISSION
CO
IMPR
0.92
0
1
0
0
0
.57
.05
.42
.54
.64
98.14
34.35
59.98
37.99
16.36
41.55
.6
.8
.6
.0
.7
.9
3.5
18.6
11.9
24.0
21.5
20.1
4.45
1.41
6.11
2.12
4.39
3.37
1.20
1.58
3.10
2.42
2.64
3.12
REDUCTIONS
NOX
IMPR
-10.5
13.
-17.
7.
-14.
-0.
6
1
5
3
6
JIMPR
-26.3
24.1
-54.3
12.0
-52.4
-1.2
IMPR
0.65
1.20
-0.12
0.91
0.50
0.63
02
5&IMPR
12.75
46.04
-2.07
29.89
10.23
15.66
RESULTS ARE : HC PPM HEXANE . CO MOLE % .NOX PPM . 02 %
3-369
-------
TABLE 21 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON ALL FAlLFn
CATALYTIC CONVERTER EQUIPPED VEHICLES BEFORE MAINTENANCE
DENVER
MODE : 50 MPH
1975 & 1976 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 308 VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
ALL VEHICLES
MEAN
HC
S.D.
CO
MEAN S.D.
NOX
MEAN S.D.
MEAN s.D,
BEFORE CONVERTER
0
29
14
55
2
100
148.8
106.7
136.9
193.3
137.5
260
67
250
15
230
.1
.8
.5
.3
.7
2.48
2.49
2.74
5.60
2.71
1.31
1.86
1.99
0.36
1.83
1018
718
845
576
867
.0
.2
.4
.8
.8
546.2
456.2
372.6
219.0
446.5
1.29
2.93
1.50
1.50
1.65
1.33
1.83
1.62
1.31
1.65
AFTER CONVERTER
AMER. MOTORS 0
CHRYSLER 29
FORD 14
GENERAL MOTORS 55
IMPORTS 2
ALL VEHICLES 100
110.7 127.1
78.0 60.2
116.4 189.4
200.0 30.0
111.6 156.8
2.51 1.54 920.0 719.7 0.57 l.tt
1.63 2.07 728.6 455.4 1.43 1.15
2.48 2.18 774.6 374.0 0.36 0.12
5.87 0.71 542.6,266.8 1.63 1$
2.46 2.06 802.3 505.7 0.61 0.92
SUMMARY OF AFTER CONVERTER EXHAUST EMISSION REDUCTIONS
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
ALL VEHICLES
HC
CO
IMPR JIMPR IMPR *IMPR
EMISSION RESULTS ARE : HC PPM HEXANE . CO MOLE % .NOX PPM . 02 %
0
29
14
55
2
100
38
28
20
-6
25
.1
.7
.5
.7
.9
25.6
26.9
15.0
-3.4
18.8
-0
0
0
-0
0
.03
.86
.26
.27
.25
-1.29
34.49
9.60
-4.76
9.26
98
-10
70
34
65
.0
.3
.8
.1
.5
9.6
-1.4
8.4
5.9
7.5
0.73
1.50
1.13
-0.13
1.04
56.21
51.25
75.73
JJ)
62.
3-370
-------
TABLE 21 CONT'D
,,uu»RY OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON ALL FAILED
SU CATALYTIC CONVERTER EQUIPPED VEHICLES BEFORE MAINTENANCE
DENVER
MODE : 30 MPH
1975 & 1976 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 308 VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
ALL VEHICLES
HC CO
MEAN S.D. MEAN S.D.
NOX
MEAN S.D.
MEAN
02
S.D.
BEFORE CONVERTER
0
29
14
55
2
100
194.
194.
179.
261.
188.
1
3
9
7
5
257.
248.
243.
79.
243.
9
9
5
4
0
AFTER
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
ALL VEHICLES
0
29
14
55
2
100
SUMMARY
A^R. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
^ VEHICLES
0
29
14
55
2
100
138.
82.
136.
265.
133.
4
0
9
0
0
OF AFTER
IMPR
55.7
112.3
43.0
-3.3
55.4
HC
71.
63.
128.
86.
108.
4
2
3
7
8
CONVERTER
2.19
3.09
2.53
6.57
2.63
1.22
1.92
1.87
3.78
1.90
972.7
224.4
498.0
347.4
588.3
524.4
135.8
348.2
294.2
462.2
1.44
3.41
1.92
1.77
2.00
1.57
2.15
1.71
1.78
1.83
CONVERTER
2.19
1.87
2.55
6.70
2.47
1.46
2.41
1.97
3.81
2.09
898.0
252.6
445.1
326.1
542.0
482.1
162.7
354.1
276.6
438.1
0.55
1.59
0.33
1.70
0.62
1.10
1.30
0.50
1.92
1.00
EXHAUST EMISSION REDUCTIONS
CO
/&IMPR IMPR
28.7
57.8
23.9
-1.3
29.4
0
1
-0
-0
0
.01
.22
.02
.13
.16
*IMPR
0.24
39.42
-0.98
-2.03
6.20
NOX
IMPR
74.6
-28.2
52.9
21.2
46.2
$IMPR
7.7
-12.6
10.6
6.1
7.9
IMPR
0.89
1.83
1.60
0.07
1.39
02
JIMPR
61.81
53.52
83.08
3.77
69.25
°N RESULTS ARE : HC PPM HEXANE . CO MOLE % .NOX PPM . 02 %
3-371
-------
TABLE 21 CONT'D
SUMMARY
!Y OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON ALL FAILPn
CATALYTIC CONVERTER EQUIPPED VEHICLES BEFORE MAINTENANCE
DENVER
MODE : IDLE(D)
1975 & 1976 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 308 VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
ALL VEHICLES
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
ALL VEHICLES
HC
MEAN S.
CO
D. MEAN S.D.
NOX
MEAN S.D.
MEAN
02
S.D.
BEFORE CONVERTER
0
28
13
51
1
93
0
28
13
51
1
93
SUMMARY
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
ALL VEHICLES
0
28
13
51
1
93
389.6
423.9
328.1
272.5
359.2
392.0
261.8
289.9
272.5
315.5
OF AFTER
HC
IMPR !
-2.4
162.1
38.2
0.0
43.7
403
458
277
10
343
377
163
136
3
238
.9
.2
.0
.6
.9
AFTER
.1
.7
.5
.5
.8
CONVERTER
5.74
5.55
5.42
8.20
5.59
2.43
3.00
2.59
0.28
2.58
56
58
83
91
72
.7
.5
.5
.6
.1
27.3
64.2
78.6
13.3
65.2
1.60
3.72
2.36
0.95
2.31
1,6?
2.6?
2.08
0.49
2.14
CONVERTER
5.96
5.47
5.70
8.35
5.80
2.40
3.10
2.72
0.07
2.66
48
54
56
87
54
EXHAUST EMISSION
CO
&IMPR IMPR
-0.
38.
11.
0.
12.
6 -0
2 0
7 -0
0 -0
2 -0
.22
.08
.28
.15
.21
JIMPR
-3.89
1.44
-5.19
-1.83
-3.72
.9
.8
.8
.2
.9
22.8
41.5
59.5
15.6
48.1
0.90
1.84
0.42
0.80
0.78
1,16
2.73
0.53
0,42
1.35
REDUCTIONS
NOX
IMPR
7
3
26
4
17
.7
.6
.7
.4
.2
$IMPR
13.7
6.2
31.9
4.8
23.9
IMPR
0.70
1.88
1.94
0.15
1.53
V
43-75
82.1*
_ flft
15-75
66.20
EMISSION RESULTS ARE : HC PPM HEXANE . CO MOLE % .NQX PPM . 02 %
3-372
-------
TABLE 21 CONT'D
OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON ALL FAILED
CATALYTIC CONVERTER EQUIPPED VEHICLES BEFORE MAINTENANCE
DENVER
MODE : IDLE(N)
1975 & 1976 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 308 VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
ALL VEHICLES
HC CO
MEAN S.D. MEAN S.D.
NOX
MEAN S.D.
MEAN
02
S.D.
BEFORE CONVERTER
0
29
14
55
2
100
398.
357.
369.
206.
370.
4
7
0
7
9
415.
522.
282.
92.
359.
0
5
0
4
6
AFTER
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
ALL VEHICLES
0
29
14
55
2
100
SUMMARY
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
*"• VEHICLES
^SSION RESULTS
0
29
14
55
2
100
ARE :
407.
217.
365.
185.
350.
1
7
6
0
3
OF AFTER
IMPR
-8.6
140.0
3.4
21.7
20.6
HC 1
HC
c
PPM
416.
188.
229.
67.
292.
0
2
3
3
5
CONVERTER
6.22
4.33
5.49
7.13
5.57
2.37
3.35
2.57
4.29
2.73
42.7
36.0
51.4
52.1
46.7
17.2
32.1
74.4
20.8
56.8
1.66
4.45
2.28
2.17
2.42
1.58
3.29
1.90
2.04
2.23
CONVERTER
5.99
4.10
5.70
6.70
5.58
2.57
3.37
2.61
3.38
2.77
40.7
39.5
28.2
56.1
34.2
17.1
22.3
14.3
17.1
17.8
0.82
3.11
0.41
2.07
0.97
1.12
3.63
0.58
2.04
1.83
EXHAUST EMISSION REDUCTIONS
CO
tIMPR IMPR *IMPR
-2.2
39.1
0.9
10.5
5.6
HEXA!
0
0
-0
0
-0
MR . I
.24
.23
.21
.43
.00
no MDT
3.82
5.23
-3.90
6.07
-0.03
.F. 4 .NO)
NOX
IMPR
2.0
-3.4
23.2
-4.0
12.4
C PPM . I
4IMPR
4.6
-9.5
45.1
-7.7
26.7
02 *
IMPR
0.84
1.34
1.87
0.10
1.45
02
JIMPR
50.83
30.13
81.83
4.62
59.78
3-373
-------
TABLE 21 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON ALL F
CATALYTIC CONVERTER EQUIPPED VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
MODE : 50 MPH
1975 & 1976 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 308 VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
ALL VEHICLES
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
ALL VEHICLES
HC
MEAN S.
CO
D. MEAN S.D.
NOX
MEAN S.D.
02
MEAN S.D
BEFORE CONVERTER
0
29
14
55
2
100
0
29
14
55
2
100
SUMMARY
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
ALL VEHICLES
0
29
14
55
2
100
98.
81.
90.
143.
92.
72.
58.
75.
95.
72.
6
0
2
3
8
8
0
9
0
9
OF AFTER
IMPR
25.9
23.0
14.3
48.3
19.9
48
59
52
49
52
43
64
63
116
59
.7
.0
.9
.3
.9
AFTER
.7
.4
.5
.9
.9
CONVERTER
2.59
2.29
2.72
4.53
2.67
1.60
1.61
1.94
1.29
1.80
850.4
513.9
784.9
546.0
756.6
468
300
451
77
441
.3
.0
.3
.5
.9
1.32 l.l
2.97 1.4i
1.80 1.1]
4.00 1.N
1.90 Ul
CONVERTER
2.51
1.47
2.53
2.95
2.38
1.88
1.75
2.15
3.85
2.08
711.1
511.8
703.0
402.7
668.3
409
318
448
31
418
.2
.0
.4
.3
.2
0.10 0.61
1.16 l.lf
0.26 0.2J
2.00 O.oi
0.53 0."
EXHAUST EMISSION REDUCTIONS
HC CO
JIMPR IMPR *IMPR
26.
28.
15.
33.
21.
2 0
4 0
8 0
7 1
4 0
.08
.82
.18
.58
.29
3.19
35.70
6.75
34.93
10.83
NOX
IMPR *IMPR
139.3
2.2
81.9
143.3
88.3
16
0
10
26
11
.4
.4
.4
.2
.7
02
IMPR fl*
0.92 »•*
1.51 50-B
kg
1.5* ffi'
A flfl
2.00 9*
y, W.2I
l.JI
EMISSION RESULTS ARE : HC PPM HEXANE . CO MOLE % .NOX PPM . 02 %
3-374
-------
TABLE 21 CONT'D
«,,UU«RY OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON ALL FAILED
SU CATALYTIC CONVERTER EQUIPPED VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
MODE : 30 MPH
1975 & 1976 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 308 VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
ALL VEHICLES
HC CO
MEAN S.D. MEAN S.D.
NOX
MEAN S.
D.
MEAN
02
S.D.
BEFORE CONVERTER
0
29
14
55
2
100
129.8
132.7
116.2
223.3
125.6
54.
84.
65.
40.
66.
9
1
0
4
7
AFTER
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
ALL VEHICLES
0
29
14
55
2
100
SUMMARY
AMER. MDTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
ALl- VEHICLES
0
29
14
55
2
100
103.1
88.3
92.1
115.0
95.3
OF AFTER
HC
IMPR ?
26.7
44.3
24.1
108.3
30.3
53.
77.
72.
117.
68.
1
0
0
2
4
CONVERTER
1.97
3.41
2.00
6.67
2.33
1.04
1.99
1.72
0.58
1.81
808.9
184.2
500.3
183.0
532.2
375
139
415
65
422
.8
.3
.0
.0
.1
1.43
3.10
2.19
4.60
2.18
1.42
1.99
2.00
0.46
1.93
CONVERTER
1.76
2.60
1.92
2.57
1.99
0.97
2.71
1.78
4.01
1.84
655.0
190.4
452.8
223. 8
465.0
361
132
398
118
383
.8
.7
.1
.2
.6
0.36
1.46
0.27
2.77
0.54
0.62
1.16
0.37
1.00
0.84
EXHAUST EMISSION REDUCTIONS
CO
&IMPR IMPR $IMPR
20.6
33.4
20.8
48.5
24.1
0
0
0
4
0
.21
.81
.08
.10
.34
10.75
23.71
3.83
61.50
14.61
NOX
IMPR
153.9
-6.2
47.5
-40.9
67.3
*IM
19,
3R
.0
-3.4
9.5
-22.3
12.6
IMPR
1.07
1.64
1.92
1.83
1.64
02
*IMPR
74.94
52.90
87.65
39.86
75.04
RESULTS ARE : HC PPM HEXANE . CO MOLE % .NOX PPM . 02 %
3-375
-------
TABLE 21 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON ALL FAITPn
bmm CATALYTIC CONVERTER EQUIPPED VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE °
DENVER
MODE : IDLE(D)
1975 & 1976 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 308 VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
ALL VEHICLES
HC
MEAN S.D.
CO
MEAN S.D.
NOX
MEAN S.D.
02
MEAN S.D,
BEFORE CONVERTER
0
28
13
51
1
93
135
120
172
145
153
.0
.9
.1
.0
.0
49
95
99
35
87
.0
.7
.1
.4
.5
1.77
2.66
1.09
5.00
1.60
1.28
2.99
1.12
1.70
1.72
91.9
112.9
183.6
63.1
143.6
33.6
130.6
148.6
3.6
128.0
1.83
4.00
3.35
6.50
3.06
1.51
2,32
2.4S
0.11
2.3?
AFTER CONVERTER
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
ALL VEHICLES
0
28
13
51
1
93
105.9
99.3
97.8
77.5
100.0
60.5
96.5
93.6
17.7
83.8
1.37 1.14 76.2 36.5
2.17 3.27 86.1 57.8
0.97 1.38 142.2 122.5
0.05 0.01 77.0 1.8
1.25 1.75 113.1 99.1
0.92 1.22
2.69 3.01
1.12 1.21
5.30 0.«
1.38 1.7?
SUMMARY OF AFTER CONVERTER EXHAUST EMISSION REDUCTIONS
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
ALL VEHICLES
0
28
13
51
1
93
HC
IMPR JIMPR
29
21
74
67
53
.1
.6
.2
.5
.0
21.6
17.8
43.1
46.6
34.6
CO
IMPR 3&IMPR
0.40
0.49
0.11
4.94
0.35
22
18
10
98
22
.40
.32
.42
.90
.07
NOX
IMPR JIMPR
15.7
26.8
41.4
-13.9
30.5
17
23
22
-22
21
.1
.7
.5
.0
.2
IMPR fl*1
0.91
1.31
2.23
1.20
1 Aft
1 .00
49.80
32.8*
0
. tf
l!.*
Al
54.53
EMISSION RESULTS ARE : HC PPM HEXANE . CO MOLE % .NOX PPM . 02 %
3-376
-------
TABLE 21 CONT'D
OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON ALL FAILED
CATALYTIC CONVERTER EQUIPPED VEHICLES AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
MODE : IDLE(N)
1975 & 1976 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 308 VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH
VEHICLE MFG.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
ALL VEHICLES
MEAN
HC CO
S.D. MEAN S
.D.
NOX
MEAN S.D.
MEAN
02
S.D.
BEFORE CONVERTER
0
29
14
55
2
100
124.
150.
205.
101.
171.
5
3
9
7
5
47.
123.
175.
119.
144.
0
7
1
8
6
AFTER
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
ALL VEHICLES
0
29
14
55
2
100
SUMMARY
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
ALL VEHICLES
ASSIGN RESULTS
0
87.
61.
98.
250.
94.
9
7
8
0
7
56.
63.
103.
389.
105.
2
5
2
7
1
OF AFTER CONVERTER
IMPR
HC
*IMPR
29 36.6
14 88.7
55 107.2
2 -148.3
100 76.9
ARE :
HC 1
?F
29.4
59.0
52.0
-145.9
44.8
'M HEXAl
1.93 1
1.62 2
1.29 1
2.33 2
1.55 1
.17
.39
.21
.31
.47
58.7
32.9
63.5
24.0
56.5
17.9
12.5
29.2
6.0
26.6
1.80
4.94
3.50
6.13
3.31
1.57
2.64
2.50
2.15
2.53
CONVERTER
1.31 1
1.11 2
1.05 1
2.82 4
1.18 1
EXHAUST
.31
.41
.48
.83
.73
46.9
39.1
54.9
38.1
49.8
20.5
14.8
30.4
23.1
26.3
0.77
3.85
1.13
6.63
1.59
0.83
3.49
1.22
1.51
2.13
EMISSION REDUCTIONS
CO
IMPR *IMPR
0
0
0
-0
0
MR . l
.62 32.
.51 31.
.24 18.
.49 -21.
.37 23.
m MDI.R 1
28
48
67
00
69
i .NO
NOX
IMPR $IMPR
11.8
-6.1
8.6
-14.0
6.7
X PPM .
20.1
-18.7
13.5
-58.3
11.8
02 1
IMPR
1.03
1.09
2.37
-0.50
1.72
02
$IMPR
57.47
22.13
67.76
-8.15
52.00
3-377
-------
3.7.6 Maladjustment and Disablement Inspection Results
Summary results of the Maladjustment and Disablement Inspection
Denver Inspection/Maintenance Evaluation Task vehicles are presented
the two pages comprising Table 22 which follows. This same inforraati
is summarized and presented in a slightly different format below.
Item Maladjustment and Disablement Occurrences
on
on
.on
Exhaust system
A.I.R. system
E.G.R. system
Air Cleaner
Idle Limiter
Caps
Ignition Timing
Ignition Adv.
Mechanism
Fuel System
125 Passed Phase
(No.)
2
3
2
6
53
56
1
0
1 Vehicles
(%)
1
2
1
4
42
44
0
0
258 (All)
(No.)
1
1
9
16
176
162
4
4
railed VehiclPB
(I)
0
0
3
6
68
62
1
1
The results of this inspection indicate maladjustment and disablement
to be predominantly in air/fuel mixture (idle limiter caps) and ignition
timing adjustments. It is important to note that maladjustment and
disablement relative to these two adjustments was more frequent on the
failed vehicles than on the passed vehicles which may very well be a
factor which contributes to emission related failure.
3-378
-------
YEAR
TAELE22
OF MALADJUSTMENT / DISABLEMENT OCCURENCES
ON PHASE 1 PASSED VEHICLES
DENVER
IDLE
EXHAUST A.I.R. E.G.R. AIR LIMITER TIMING ADVANCE FUEL
wn OF SYSTEM SYSTEM SYSTEM CLEANER CAPS MECHANISM SYSTEM
VEH NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. %
1975 & 1976
AM3R. MDTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MDTORS
IMPORTS
TOTAL
1971
AMER. MDTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MDTORS
IMPORTS
TOTAL
1973
AM5R. MDTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
®!ERAL MDTORS
IMPORTS
TOTAL
1972
WBJ. MDTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MDTORS
IMPORTS
TOTAL
AlLVEHrrtpo
--^
2
5
20
27
19
73
1
2
5
11
3
22
0
1
2
11
2
16
0
1
5
6
2
1 1t
14
*
0
0
0
1 4
0
1 1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1 17
0
1 7
0
0
2
0
0
2
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
10 0
1
0
3 1
0
0
1
9 0
0
5 1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
4 1
0
1 2
1
0
20 1
0
0
5 2
0
0
2
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
2
20 2
8
4 8
4
3 24
100 1
1
20 3
7
0
9 12
0
0
18 6
0
13 6
0
4
6
1
11
100
40
40
30
21
33
100
50
60
64
55
55
38
80
100
50
79
1
1
8
6
11
27
1
2
1
6
2
12
1
2
5
1
9
1
2
4
1
8
50
20
40
22
58
37
100
100
20
55
67
55
100
100
45
50
56
100
40
67
50
57
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1 20
0
0
1 7
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
125
22 26 5 53 42 56 45 1 1
0
3-379
-------
SUtlARY
TABLE 22 CONT'D
OF MALADJUSTMENT / DISABLEMENT OOCURENCES
ON ALL FAILED VEHICLES
DENVER
IDLE
MODEL NO. OF
YEAR VEH
1975 & 1976
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
TOTAL
1974
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
TOTAL
1973
AM2R. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
TOTAL
1972
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
TOTAL
9
29
16
56
14
124
1
6
8
9
7
31
2
13
14
12
12
53
2
10
14
16
8
50
— • —
EXHAUST
SYSTEM
NO. %
0
0
0
1 2
0
1 1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
A.I.R. E.G.R. AIR
SYSTEM SYSTEM CLEANER
NO. $ NO. % NO. %
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
6 0
3
0
1 4
0
1
0
1
0
2
0
2
1
0
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3 0
0
5 1
0
3 1
0
17 1
2
11 1
1
6 5
0
15 3
7 1
1
0
6 5
1
2
1
1
0
5
2
1
17
25
11
14
16
23
7
8
9
50
20
7
6
10
LDCTER
CAPS
NO. %
2
21
11
42
3
79
1
3
8
6
5
23
1
10
10
8
6
35
2
9
13
11
4
39
22
72
69
75
21
64
100
50
100
67
71
74
50
77
71
67
50
66
100
90
93
69
50
78
TIMING
I*
NO. %
1
20
11
37
5
80
1
4
2
2
3
12
1
10
5
6
7
29
2
9
12
11
7
41
78
69
69
66
36
65
100
67
25
22
43
39
50
77
36
50
58
55
100
90
86
69
88
82
ADVANCE
ECHANISM
1 11
0
0
1 2
0
2 2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2 11
0
0
*\ Jl
- — . — —
^
RE
SBIJH
^
0
1 3
0
1 I
0
2 I
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1 8
0
0
0
1 2
0
0
1 7
0
0
,
t~*
a 2
ALL VEHICLES 258 1
1 09 3 16 6 176 68 162 63 4
3-380
-------
formation on Denver Inspection/Maintenance Evaluation Task
les is provided in summary form on the twelve pages comprising
T ble 23 which follows. This information can be interpreted as follows:
N/A indicates the percentage of vehicles in the column to
which the particular serviceable item does not apply. A
"50" adjacent to the A.I.R. System, for example, indicates
50 percent of the vehicles in the corresponding column were
not so equipped.
SRP translates to service replacement. The number appearing
in this column indicates the percentage of vehicles on which
the given item was replaced as dictated by the manufacturer's
required service schedule.
DRP translates to defective, replaced. The number appearing
in this column indicates the percentage of vehicles on which
the given part was replaced because it was defective as
opposed to being replaced because of a service schedule
requirement.
RPA translates to repaired. The number appearing in this
column indicates the percentage of vehicles on which the
given part or system was repaired as opposed to being replaced
or adjusted.
ADJ translates to adjusted. The number appearing under this
column indicates the percentage of vehicles on which the given
item was adjusted.
In interpreting this information, it is important to note that any
percentages appearing in the columns relate only to the total number
°f vehicles which appear at the top of the column. If, for example,
-Or
appears under N/A adjacent to A.I.R. System and a 50 appears under
adjacent to the same item, the 50 indicates that 50 percent of
6 t0tal vehicles to which the column relates had A.I.R. System
acement due to defects as opposed to 50 percent of the vehicles
A.I.R. Systems were installed.
3-381
-------
TABLE 23
SUMMARY OF TUNE UP INFORMATION
ON PHASE 1 PASSED VEHICLES
DENVER
AMERICAN MOTORS
NO. OF VEHICLES 2 NO. OF VEHICLES 1 NO. OF VEHICLES 0 NO. OF VEHICLES 0
AIR CLEANER
AIR FILTER
A.I.R. SYS
AIR PUMP BLT
HEAT RISER V
IDLE RPM
I. A/F RATIO
CARB CHK ACT
CARB FLOAT
CARBURETOR
FUEL FILTER
FUEL PUMP
FILLER CAP
FUEL SYSTEM
EVAP CONT
PVC SYSTEM
EGR SYSTEM
EXHAUST SYS
VACUUM SYS
ELECT. IGN.
DIST. CAP
ROTOR
POINTS
ADVANCE MECH
IGNITION HRS
ELECTL HIRES
COIL
CONDENSER
SPARK PLUGS
TIMING
N/A»
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
100
0
0
0
0
100
0
0
1975
SRP»
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
& 19
DRP*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
70 -
RPAJ
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
ADJJ
0
0
0
50
0
100
50
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
50
N/A*
0
0
100
100
0
0
0
0
0"
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
100
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
SRPJ
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
100
0
IVI1
DRPJ
0
100
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
100
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RPA»
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
100
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
ADJJ
0
0
0
0
0
100
100
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
100
N/AJ
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
SRPJ :
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1 7 f J
DRPJ
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RPAJ
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
ADJJ
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
N/AJ
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
SRPJ
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Wid
DRPJ
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RPAJ
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
ADJJ
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
DWELL
100
0 100
3-382
-------
TABLE 23 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF TONE UP INFORMATION
ON PHASE 1 PASSED VEHICLES
DENVER
CHRYSLER
HO. OF VEHICLES 5 NO. OF VEHICLES 2 NO. OF VEHICLES 1 NO. OF VEHICLES 1
N/AJ
AIR CLEANER 0
AM FILTER 0
A.I.H. SYS 100
AIR POMP BLT 100
BEIT RISER V 0
IDLE BPH 0
I. Iff RATIO 0
CARB COT ACT 0
CARS FLOAT 0
CARBURETOR 0
FUEL FILTER 0
FUEL PUMP 0
FILLER CAP 0
FUEL SYSTEM 0
E?JP CONT 0
P»C SYSTEM 0
BGR SYSTEM 0
OHiOST SYS 0
V»C00H SIS 0
H-ECT. IGH. o
"1ST. CAP n
u
BOTOR n
U
roars 100
«WUCB HECH 0
wnnos WHS o
^KTI WIRES o
con, .
0
COKlWIiGDn
"""MSBI 100
*»* PLOGS o
0
100
- 197!
SRPJ
0
20
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 .
5 & 11
DRPJ
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
n
J7o —
RPAJ
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
20
0
0
0
0
0
20
40
0
20
0
0
0
0
0
0
20
0
0
0
0
n
ADJJ
0
0
0
0
0
100
100
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
80
N/AJ
0
0
100
100
100
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
100
0
0
0
0
100
0
0
SRPJ
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
IVIt
DRPJ
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
50
0
0
0
50
50
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RPAJ
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
50
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
ADJJ
0
0
0
0
0
100
100
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
100
N/AJ
0
0
100
100
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
100
0
0
0
0
100
0
0
SRPJ
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
IVI3
DRPJ
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
100
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RPAJ
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
100
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
ADJJ
0
0
0
0
0
100
100
0
0
100
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
100
N/AJ
0
0
100
100
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
100
0
0
0
0
0
100
0
0
0
0
100
0
0
SRPJ
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
lyf*
DRPJ
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
100
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RPAJ
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
ADJJ
0
0
0
0
0
100
100
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
100
100 0 0 0 - 0 100 0 0 0 0 100
3-383
-------
TABLE 23 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF TUNE UP INFORMATION
ON PHASE 1 PASSED VEHICLES
DENVER
FORD
NO. OF VEHICLES 20 NO. OF VEHICLES 5 NO. OF VEHICLES 2 NO. OF VEHICLES 5
AIR CLEANER
AIR FILTER
A.I.R. SYS
AIR PUMP BLT
HEAT RISER V
IDLE RPM
I. A/F RATIO
CARB CHK ACT
CARB FLOAT
CARBURETOR
FUEL FILTER
FUEL PUMP
FILLER CAP
FUEL SYSTEM
EVAP CONT
PVC SYSTEM
EGR SYSTEM
EXHAUST SYS
VACUUM SYS
ELECT. IGN.
DIST. CAP
ROTOR
POINTS
ADVANCE MECH
IGNITION WRS
ELECTL WIRES
COIL
CONDENSER
SPARK PLUGS
TIMING
DWELL
N/AJ
0
0
5
5
25
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
100
0
0
0
0
100
0
0
100
- 197:
SRPJ
0
20
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
10
0
0
0
0
20
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
15
0
0
> 4 1!
DRPJ
0
10
5
5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
15
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
no —
RPAJ
0
0
5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
0
5
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
0
0
0
0
0
ADJJ
0
0
0
0
0
95
80
5
0
5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
65
0
N/AJ
0
0
100
100
100
0
0
0
' 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
10
0
0
60
0
0
0
0
60
0
0
60
SRPJ
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
I»I1
DRPJ
0
20
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
20
0
0
0
0
0
RPAJ
20
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
DO
0
0
20
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
ADJJ
0
0
0
0
0
100
100
0
0
20
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
80
20
N/AJ
0
0
100
100
50
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
100
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
SRPJ
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
>yi 3
DRPJ
0
50
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RPAJ
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
ADJJ
0
0
0
0
0
100
100
0
0
50
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
50
0
0
0
0
0
0
100
50
N/AJ
0
0
100
100
100
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
100
0
0
100
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
SRPJ
0
20
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
20
0
0
0
0
20
0
0
0
0
0
0
20
0
0
0
0
0
20
0
0
1972
DRPJ
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
20
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RPAJ
20
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
20
0
0
40
0
0
0
0
0
0
20
0
0
0
0
0
"•••.
AMI
0
0
0
0
0
100
100
20
20
20
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
(0
0
0
0
0
0
0
60
40
3-384
-------
TABLE 23 COHT'D
SUMMARY OF TUNE DP INFORMATION
ON PHASE 1 PASSED VEHICLES
DENVER
GENERAL MOTORS
HO. OF VEHICLES 27 NO. OF VEHICLES 11 NO. OF VEHICLES 11 NO. OF VEHICLES
AIR CLEANER
AIR FILTER
A.I.R. SYS
AIR PUMP BLT
BEAT RISER V
IDLE RPM
I. A/F RATIO
GARB CHK ACT
CARB FLOAT
CARBURETOR
FUEL FILTER
FUEL PUMP
FILLER CAP
FUEL SYSTEM
BVAP COHT
PVC SYSTEM
KR SYSTEM
EXHAUST SYS
MCUUHSYS
&KT. IGN.
BIST. CAP
ROTOR
roars
U««B MBCH
108111011 ""s
aKCTL HIRES
con,
COSDBi
SBR
sp»tt PLDGS
IDttMG
N/AJ
0
0
78
78
7
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
100
0
0
0
0
100
Q
0
100
1975
SRPJ
0
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
7
0
0
0
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 .
& 1!
DRPJ
0
15
0
0
0
, 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
7
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
no —
RPAJ
7
0
0
0
7
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
7
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
ADJJ
0
0
0
0
0
89
89
0
0
4
0
0
0
0
0
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
56
0
N/AJ
0
0
45
45
91
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
82
0
0
18
0
0
0
0
18
0
0
18
SRPJ
0
27
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
9
0
0
0
36
18
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
9
0
27
0
0
• »if
DRPJ
9
45
0
0
0
0
0
0
9
0
18
0
0
0
27
9
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
27
0
0
RPAJ
9
0
9
0
0
0
0
9
0
9
0
0
0
0
0
0
9
9
9
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
o -
V
3-
ADJJ
0
0
0
0
0
100
91
9
0
9
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
18
0
0
0
0
0
9
100
64
385
N/AJ
0
0
36
36
100
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
100
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
SRPJ
0
9
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
9
0
0
0
0
27
0
0
0
0
9
9
9
0
0
0
0
9
36
0
•0
171 3
DRPJ
0
36
0
0
0
0
0
0
9
0
18
0
0
0
27
27
0
0
0
0
0
0
9
0
0
0
0
9
9
0
0
RPAJ
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
9
0
0
0
0
0
0
9
0
18
0
0
0
0
9
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
ADJJ
0
0
0
0
0
100
100
0
0
9
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
9
0
0
0
0
0
0
100
73
N/AJ
0
0
67
67
83
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
100
0
0
100
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
SRPJ
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
b
0
0
\*}(C.
DRPJ
17
33
17
17
0
0
0
0
0
0
17
0
0
0
33
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
17
0
0
0
0
0
33
0
0
RPAJ ADJJ
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 100
o 83
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
50 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 83
0 67
-------
TABLE 23 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF TUNE UP INFORMATION
ON PHASE 1 PASSED VEHICLES
DENVER
IMPORTS
NO. OF VEHICLES 19 NO. OF VEHICLES 3 NO. OF VEHICLES 2 NO. OF VEHICLES 2
AIR CLEANER
AIR FILTER
A.I.R. SYS
AIR PUMP BLT
HEAT RISER V
IDLE RPM
I. A/F RATIO
CARB CHK ACT
CARB FLOAT
CARBURETOR
FUEL FILTER
FUEL PUMP
FILLER CAP
FUEL SYSTEM
EVAP CONT
PVC SYSTEM
EGR SYSTEM
EXHAUST SYS
VACUUM SYS
ELECT. IGN.
DIST. CAP
ROTOR
POINTS
ADVANCE MECH
IGNITION WRS
ELECTL WIRES
COIL
CONDENSER
SPARK PLUGS
TIMING
DWELL
N/A}
0
0
11
11
95
0
0
16
21
21
0
0
0
0
5
0
37
0
0
84
0
0
16
0
0
0
0
16
0
0
O4
- 197!
SRP>
0
5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
0
0
0
5
0
0
0
0
0
5
5
5
0
0
0
0
5
16
0
n
> s i<
DRPJ
0
0
5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
A
no -
RPAJ
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
f\
ADJJ
0
0
0
11
0
71
79
5
0
5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
68
N/AJ
0
0
67
67
100
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
33
0
0
100
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
SRPJ
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
IVIt
DRP>
0
33
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
33
0
RPAt
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
33
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
ADJJ
0
0
0
0
0
100
100
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
67
0
0
0
0
0
0
100
N/A*
0
0
50
50
100
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
100
0
0
100
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
SRPJ
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
i»r 3
DRPJ
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
50
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RPAJ
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
50
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
ADJJ
0
0
0
0
0
100
50
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
50
N/AJ
0
0
100
100
100
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
100
0
0
100
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
SRPJ
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
rt
1972
DBF}
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
n
RPAJ
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
— ••
JDJ1
0
0
0
0
0
100
100
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
50
50
37
000 67 00000
3-386
-------
TABLE 23 CONT'D
SUMMARY OP TUNE DP INFORMATION
ON PHASE 1 PASSED VEHICLES
DENVER
TOTAL
HO. OF VEHICLES 73 NO. OF VEHICLES 22 NO. OF VEHICLES 16 NO. OF VEHICLES 11
AIR CLEANER
AIR FILTER
A.I.R. SYS
AIR PUMP BLT
BEAT RISER V
IDLE RPH
I. A/F RATIO
CARB Off ACT
CARS FLOAT
CARBURETOR
FUEL FILTER
FUEL PUMP
FILLER CAP
FUEL SYSTEM
BfAP CONT
PVC SYSTEM
EGR SYSTEM
EXHAUST SYS
'ACOBH SYS
ELECT. IGH.
OUT. CAP
ROTOR
roars
"WSCB MECH
KHITIOH MRS
^cn, WIRES
coa
CO
SER
sp*« PLUGS
IIXJKQ
DVELL
N/AJ
0
0
40
40
34
0
0
4
5
5
0
0
0
0
1
0
10
0
0
22
7ft
|O
0
0
0
0
78
o
0
77
- 197
SRPJ
0
10
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
7
0
0
0
3
5
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
1
in
IU
0
o..
5 & 1
DRPJ
0
8
3
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
7
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
970 -
RPAJ
3
0
1
0
3
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
4
1
7
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
ADJJ
0
0
0
4
0
88
84
3
0
4
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
63
10
N/AJ
0
0
68
68
91
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
0
0
68
0
0
32
0
0
0
0
32
0
0
32
SRPJ
0
14
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
0
0
0
18
9
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
0
18
0
0
ij»it
DRPJ
5
36
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
0
14
0
5
0
18
9
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
0
0
18
0
0
RPAJ
9
0
5
0
0
0
0
5
0
9
0
0
0
0
0
9
9
5
14
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
ADJJ
0
0
0
0
0
100
95
5
0
9
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
18
0
0
0
0
0
5
95
50
N/AJ
0
0
50
50
88
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
13
0
0
94
0
0
6
0
0
0
0
6
0
0
6
SRPJ
0
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
6
0
0
0
0
19
0
0
0
0
6
6
6
0
0
0
0
6
25
0
0
iyi3
DRPJ
0
31
0
0
0
0
0
0
6
0
13
0
0
0
31
19
0
0
0
0
0
0
6
0
0
0
0
6
6
0
0
RPAJ
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
13
0
19
0
0
0
0
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
ADJJ
0
0
0
0
0
100
94
0
0
19
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
13
0
0
0
0
0
0
94
56
N/AJ
0
0
86
86
86
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
100
0
0
93
0
0
7
0
0
0
0
7
0
0
7
SRPJ
0
7
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
7
0
0
0
0
7
0
0
0
0
0
0
7
0
0
0
0
0
7
0
0
\?tt
DRPJ
7
14
7
7
0
0
0
0
0
0
14
0
0
0
21
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
7
0
0
0
0
0
14
0
0
RPAJ
7
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
7
0
0
36
0
0
0
0
0
0
7
0
0
0
0
0
ADJJ
0
0
0
0
0
100
93
7
7
7
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
14
0
0
0
0
0
0
71
50
3-387
-------
TABLE 23 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF TUNE UP INFORMATION
ON ALL FAILED VEHICLES
DENVER
AMERICAN MOTORS
NO. OF VEHICLES 9 NO. OF VEHICLES 1 NO. OF VEHICLES 2 NO. OF VEHICLES 2
AIR CLEANER
AIR FILTER
A.I.R. SYS
AIR PUMP BLT
HEAT RISER V
IDLE RPM
I. A/F RATIO
CARB CHK ACT
CARB FLOAT
CARBURETOR
FUEL FILTER
FUEL PUMP
FILLER CAP
FUEL SYSTEM
EVAP CONT
PVC SYSTEM
EGR SYSTEM
EXHAUST SYS
VACUUM SYS
ELECT. IGN.
DIST. CAP
ROTOR
POINTS
ADVANCE MECH
IGNITION WRS
ELECTL WIRES
COIL
CONDENSER
SPARK PLUGS
TIMING
N/AJ
0
0
78
78
33
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
100
0
0
0
0
100
0
0
- 1975
SRPJ
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4 1!
DRPJ
0
33
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
11
0
0
0
0
11
0
0
11
0
0
0
0
0
0
376 -
RPAJ
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
11
0
0
0
0
0
0
ADJJ
0
0
0
0
0
100
100
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
11
78
N/AJ
0
0
100
100
100
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
100
0
0
100
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
SRPJ
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1311
DRPJ
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
100
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RPAJ
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
100
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
ADJJ
0
0
0
0
0
100
100
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
100
N/AJ
0
0
50
50
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
100
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
SRPJ
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
50
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.0
0
0
171 J
DRPJ
0
50
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
50
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RPAJ
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
50
0
50
0
0
0
0
ADJJ
0
0
0
0
0
100
100
0
0
50
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
50
0
0
0
0
0
50
100
N/AJ
0
0
100
100
50
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
50
0
100
0
0
100
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
SRPJ
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1972
DRPJ
0
50
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
50
0
0
0
0
0
0
50
0
0
0
0
50
50
0
RFAt
50
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
100
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
50
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
AW!
0
0
0
0
0
100
100
0
0
G
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
50
«rtrt
100
DWELL
100
0 100
o 100
3-388
-------
TABLE 23 CONT'D
SUMMARY OP TUNE UP INFORMATION
ON ALL FAILED VEHICLES
DENVER
CHRYSLER
NO OF VEHICLES 29 NO. OF VEHICLES 6 NO. OF VEHICLES 13 NO. OF VEHICLES 10
AIR CLEANER
AIR FILTER
A.I.R. SYS
AIR PUMP BLT
BEAT RISER V
IDLE RPM
I. A/F RATIO
CARS CHK ACT
CARB FLOAT
CARBURETOR
FUEL FILTER
FDa PUMP
FILLER CAP
FUEL SYSTEM
BVAP COHT
PTC SYSTEM
EOR SYSTEM
EXHAUST SYS
VACUUM SYS
H.ECT. IGH.
BIST. CAP
ROTOR
rows
UVMCB HBCH
IGMITION WRS
fcttTL HHES
COIL
COHDEHS
ER
SP*tt PLDGS
jjjjjg
""ELL
N/AJ
0
0
100
100
14
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
o
100
0
0
0
0
100
0
100
- 1975
SRPJ
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
7
0
0
0
14
7
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
& 1!
DRPJ
3
14
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
10
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
0
0
0
3
0
0
no —
RPAJ
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
7
3
0
14
0
0
0
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
ADJJ
0
0
0
0
0
100
100
0
0
10
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
7
79
0
N/AJ
0
0
100
100
33
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
100
0
0
0
0
100
0
0
100
SRPJ
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
17
17
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
33
0
0
!»(•«
DRPJ
17
50
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
17
17
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RPAJ
0
0
0
0
17
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
17
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
ADJJ
0
0
0
0
0
100
100
0
0
17
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
17
100
0
N/AJ
0
0
100
100
8
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
8
0
0
0
0
0
100
0
0
0
0
100
0
0
100
SRPJ
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
15
0
0
0
15
8
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
8
0
0
15(3
DRPJ
8
8
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
31
0
8
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
8
0
0
RPAJ
8
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
15
0
38
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
ADJJ
0
0
0
0
0
100
100
ff
0
8
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
92
0
N/AJ
10
0
100
100
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
100
0
0
80
0
0
20
0
0
0
0
20
0
0
20
SRPJ
0
10
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
10
10
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
iyi£
DRPJ
10
10
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
20
0
0
0
40
30
0
0
0
0
0
20
30
0
0
0
0
20
40
0
0
RPAJ
10
0
0
0
10
0
0
10
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
ADJJ
0
0
0
0
0
100
100
0
0
10
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
100
30
3-389
-------
TABLE 23 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF TUNE UP INFORMATION
ON ALL FAILED VEHICLES
DENVER
FORD
NO OF VEHICLES 16 NO. OF VEHICLES 8 NO. OF VEHICLES HI NO. OF VEHICLES 14
AIR CLEANER
AIR FILTER
A.I.R. SYS
AIR POMP BLT
HEAT RISER V
IDLE RPM
I. A/F RATIO
CARB CHK ACT
CARB FLOAT
CARBURETOR
FUEL FILTER
FUEL PUMP
FILLER CAP
FUEL SYSTEM
EVAP CONT
PVC SYSTEM
EGR SYSTEM
EXHAUST SYS
VACUUM SYS
ELECT. ION.
DIST. CAP
ROTOR
POINTS
ADVANCE MECH
IGNITION WRS
ELECTL WIRES
COIL
CONDENSER
SPARK PLUGS
TIMING
DHEI.I.
N/A)
0
0
0
0
11
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
100
0
0
0
0
100
0
0
inn
- 197:
SHPJ
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
6
0
0
0
0
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
6
0
f\
3 4 1!
DRPJ
0
19
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
HO -
RPAJ
0
0
13
0
6
0
0
6
0
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
6
0
19
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
ADJJ
0
0
0
0
0
100
100
13
0
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
81
N/A>
0
0
100
100
88
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
75
0
0
25
0
0
0
0
25
0
0
SRP>
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
13
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
IJMf
DRPJ
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
13
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RPAJ
25
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
13
0
0
0
0
0
0
38
0
25
0
0
0
0
13
0
0
0
0
0
0
ADJJt
0
0
0
0
0
100
100
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
13
88
N/AJ
0
0
100
100
93
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
in
0
0
100
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
SRP»
0
11
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
11
0
0
0
0
21
0
0
0
0
0
7
29
0
0
0
0
11
7
0
• yi j
DRPS
7
7
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
7
0
0
0
7
7
11
0
0
0
0
0
7
7
0
0
0
0
0
0
RPAJ
7
0
0
0
0
0
0
7
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
7
21
0
29
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
ADJJ
0
0
0
0
0
100
100
0
0
7
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
11
0
0
0
0
0
7
93
N/A)
0
0
100
100
93
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
100
0
0
100
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
SRPJ
0
7
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
7
7
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
A
1972
DRPJ
11
36
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
7
7
0
0
0
0
11
7
11
7
21
0
0
0
29
0
0
RPAJ
7
0
0
0
0
0
0
7
0
29
0
0
0
0
0
14
0
0
36
0
0
0
0
7
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4WI
0
0
0
0
0
100
100
7
0
7
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
7
0
0
0
0
0
21
100
|W
3*
25 0 0 0 25 0 0 0 0 61
3-390
-------
TABLE 23 COHT'D
SUMMARY OF TUNE UP INFORMATION
ON ALL FAILED VEHICLES
DENVER
GENERAL MOTORS
NO. OF VEHICLES 56 NO. OF VEHICLES 9 NO. OF VEHICLES 12 NO. OF VEHICLES 16
AIR CLEANER
AIR FILTER
A.I.R. SYS
AIR POMP BLT
HEAT RISER V
IDLE RPH
I. A/F RATIO
CARB CHK ACT
CARB FLOAT
CARBURETOR
FOEL FILTER
FUEL PUMP
FILLER CAP
FUEL SYSTEM
E¥AP COHT
PVC SYSTEM
BGR SYSTEM
EXHAUST SYS
VACUUM SYS
ELECT. IGH.
BIST. CAP
ROTOR
PODtTS
"VANCE MBCH
IGHITIOH WRS
BLSCTL WIRES
con.
COHnPUann
^vnumsgg
SP*K PLOGS
HMIHQ
DWELL
N/AJ
0
0
98
98
27
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
100
0
0
0
0
inn
1 UU
0
0
4 Aft
100
- 197!
SRPJ
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
18
0
0
0
0
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
11
0
'0
> 4 1!
DRPJ
2
25
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
5
7
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
0
0
0
0
0
0
no —
RPA*
2
0
0
0
9
0
0
4
0
4
0
0
0
0
0
4
5
0
9
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
ADJJ
0
0
0
0
0
98
100
0
0
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
77
n
N/A<
0
0
78
78
67
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
100
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
A
SRPJ
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
11
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
22
0
f\
l»lf
DRP*
11
22
11
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
11
11
0
0
0
0
11
11
33
0
0
0
0
22
11
0
n
RPAJ
11
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
11
0
0
0
0
0
0
11
0
11
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
•^
ADJJ
0
0
0
0
0
100
100
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
22
0
0
0
0
0
0
89
o*\
N/A)
0
0
75
75
75
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
100
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
SRPJ
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
8
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
25
0
A
1*13
DRPJ
8
17
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
17
8
8
0
0
0
0
0
25
0
8
0
0
17
25
0
rt
RPAJ
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
17
0
17
0
0
0
0
8
0
0
0
0
0
0
n
ADJJ
0
0
0
0
0
100
100
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
83
tc
N/AJ
0
0
94
94
94
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
100
0
0
100
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
t\
SRPJ
0
13
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
25
0
0
0
25
13
0
0
0
0
0
0
19
0
0
0
0
0
19
0
n
!»(«:
DRPJ
0
25
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
13
0
0
0
19
19
0
0
0
0
13
6
0
6
6
0
0
0
13
0
n
RPAJ
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
6
0
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
13
0
0
0
0
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
n
ADJJ
0
0
0
0
0
100
100
0
0
31
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
6
0
0
0
0
0
6
88
7<;
89
75
3-391
-------
TABLE 23 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF TUNE UP INFORMATION
ON ALL FAILED VEHICLES
DENVER
IMPORTS
NO. OF VEHICLES 11 NO. OF VEHICLES 7 NO. OF VEHICLES 12 NO. OF VEHICLES 8
1975 & 1976 1974 1973 1973
N/AJ SRPJ DRPJ RPAjl ADJJ N/AJ SRPJ DRPJ RPA* ADJjt N/A* SRP* DRP» RPAJ ADJJ N/A* SRPJ DRPJ BPAJ JDJJ
AIR CLEANER 0 0
AIR FILTER 0 0
A.I.R. SYS 57 0
AIR PUMP BLT 57 0
HEAT RISER V 86 0
IDLE RPM 00
I. A/F RATIO 7 0
CARB CHK ACT 50 0
CAHB FLOAT 57 0
CARBURETOR 57 0
FUEL FILTER 0 7
FUEL PUMP 0 0
FILLER CAP 0 0
FUEL SYSTEM 0 0
EVAP CONT 0 0
PVC SYSTEM 0 0
EGR SYSTEM 0 0
EXHAUST SYS 0 0
VACUUM SYS 0 0
ELECT. IGN. 79 0
DIST. CAP 00
ROTOR 0 0
POINTS 21 7
ADVANCE MECH 0 0
IGNITION WRS 0 0
ELECTL HIRES 0 0
COIL 0 o
CONDENSER 21 7
SPARK PLUGS 0 7
TIMING 0 o
0 21 0 000
000 0 T4 14
0 0 0 71 0 0
0 0 0 71 0 0
0 0 0 100 0 0
0 0 100 000
0 0 86 000
000 000
0 0 0 14 0 0
0 0 7 14 0 0
000 0 14 0
000 000
000 0 0 14
000 000
000 0 14 0
700 0 14 0
0 0 0 43 0 0
000 000
000 000
0 0 0 100 0 0
000 000
000 0 14 0
000 0 14 14
000 000
000 000
000 000
000 000
000 000
000 000
0 0 79 000
00000
00 0 17 25
0 0 83 0 0
0 0 83 0 0
0 0 83 0 0
0 100 000
0 100 000
0 0 25 0 0
00800
00 800
00 080-
00 000
00008
00 008
0 0 25 8 0
0 0 25 0 8
0 0 75 0 8
00000
00000
0 0 100 0 0
00 008
00 000
0 14 088
00 000
00 008
00 000
00000
00 080
0 14 088
0 100 000
80 0 0 0 13 o
00 0 0 13 0 o
0 0 100 0 0 0 0
0 0 100 0000
0 0 100 0000
0 100 0 0 0 0 100
0 92 0 0 0 0 100
00 00000
00 00000
0 25 0 0 0 13 0
00 0 25 0 0 0
00 00000
00 00000
80 00000
0 0 38 0 13 0 °
80 o 0 0 13 0
0 0 100 0 0 0 0
80 0 0 0 0 0
80 0 0 0 25 0
0 0 100 0 0 0 °
00 0 0 0 0 0
00 0 0 " °
0 17 0 13 13 ° g
00 0 0 0 0 °
00 0 0 25 °
0 •
0 «
n 0
00 0 0 0
00 0 0 0
00 0 13 13
00 0 13 25 •
0 92 0 0 0 0100
DWELL
21 000 29 0000 57 000
0 50
0 0 0
3!
100
0 75
3-392
-------
TABLE 23 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF TUNE UP INFORMATION
ON ALL FAILED VEHICLES
DENVER
TOTAL
NO. OF VEHICLES 121 NO. OF VEHICLES 31 NO. OF VEHICLES 53 NO. OF VEHICLES 50
AIR CLEANER
AIR FILTER
A.I.R. SYS
AIR PUMP BLT
HEAT RISER V
IDLE RPM
I. A/F RATIO
CARB CHK ACT
CARB aOAT
CARBURETOR
FUEL FILTER
FUEL PUMP
FILLER CAP
FUEL SYSTEM
EVAP CONT
PVC SYSTEM
KR SYSTEM
EXHAUST SYS
VACUUM SYS
H.ECT IGN.
WST. CAP
SOTOR
POINTS
WANCB HECH
IGNITION MRS
ELKTL WIRES
COIL
CONDENSER
3P»« PLUGS
TIDING
WELL
N/AJ
0
0
80
80
33
0
1
6
6
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
9
0
0
o
o
0
Q
0
91
- 1975
SRPJ
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
11
0
0
0
3
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
1 4 H
DRPJ
2
19
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
5
6
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
2
0
0
0
1
0
0
no -
RPAJ
4
0
2
0
5
0
0
2
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
3
4
0
10
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
ADJJ
0
0
0
0
0
99
98
2
0
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
78
3
N/AJ
0
0
87
87
74
0
0
0
3
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
13
0
0
74
0
0
26
0
0
0
0
26
0
0
26
SRPJ
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
6
0
0
0
10
6
0
0
0
0
0
3
3
0
0
0
0
0
13
0
0
1 7C •»
DRPJ
6
19
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
6
10
3
0
0
0
3
3
13
0
0
0
0
6
3
0
0
RPAJ
10
0
0
0
3
0
0
0
0
10
0
0
0
0
0
0
13
0
13
0
0
0
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
ADJJ
0
0
0
0
0
100
100
0
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
10
0
0
0
0
0
10
94
,15
N/AJ
0
0
89
89
62
0
0
6
2
2
0
0
0
0
6
6
23
0
0
75
0
0
25
0
0
0
0
25
0
0
25
SRPJ
0
8
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
11
0
0
0
6
9
0
0
0
0
0
2
9
0
0
0
0
6
11
0
0
1 11 3
DRPJ
6
15
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
2
2
15
6
9
0
0
0
2
0
9
2
4
0
0
4
9
0
0
RPAJ
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
4
13
2
23
0
0
0
0
4
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
ADJJ
0
0
0
0
0
100
98
0
0
11
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
9
0
0
0
0
0
4
91
49
N/AJ
2
0
98
98
74
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
8
0
100
0
0
96
0
0
4
0
0
0
0
4
0
0
4
SRPJ
0
8
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
12
0
0
0
12
8
0
0
0
0
0
0
8
0
0
0
0
2
8
0
0
iyie
DRPJ
6
24
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
8
0
0
0
18
16
0
0
0
0
8
8
14
4
12
0
0
8
26
0
0
RPAJ
6
0
0
0
2
0
0
6
0
16
0
0
0
0
0
6
0
0
20
0
0
0
0
u
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
ADJJ
0
0
0
0
0
100
100
2
0
14
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
8
0
0
0
0
0
16
96
56
3-393
-------
3.7.8 Maintenance Coats
Summarized maintenance cost data for the Denver Inspection/
Maintenance Evaluation Task vehicles are shown on the twelve pages
comprising Table 24 which follow.
These data are further summarized below.
3-394
-------
Average Maintenance Costs ($)
73 passed 1975/1976 Model Phase I Vehicles
Labor
Parts
Total
Emission
Tune-up"
15.40
1.77
17.18
Correct
Disablement
2.52
0.00
2.52
Recommended Total
Maintenance
3.75 21.67
2.54 A.31
6.30 25.99
Average Maintenance Costs ($)
22 Passed 1974 Model Phase I Vehicles
Labor
Parts
Total
Emission
Tune-up
22.70
8.68
31.39
Correct
Disablement
1.10
0.00
1.10
Recommended Total
Maintenance
4.17 27.98
3.92 12.61
8.10 40.59
Average Maintenance Costs ($)
16 Passed 1973 Model Phase I Vehicles
Labor
Parts
Total
Emission
Tune-up
22.53
6.94
29.47
Correct
Disablement
0.59
0.00
0.59
Recommended Total
Maintenance
5.40 28.52
4.53 11.48
9.93 40.00
Average Maintenance Costs ($)
Labor
Parts
Total
14 Passed
Emission
Tune-up
25.65
6.45
32.10
1972 Model Phase
Correct
Disablement
0.58
0.00
0.58
I Vehicles
Recommended
Maintenance
2.41
2.52
4.93
Total
28.64
8.97
37.61
3-395
-------
Average Maintenance Costs ($)
112 (All) 1975/1976 Model Phase I Vehicles
Emission Correct Recommended Total
Tune-up Disablement Maintenance ~~
Labor 15.51 2.42 3.53 21.47
Parts 2.44 0.08 2.13 4.65
Total 17.96 2.50 5.66 26.12
Average Maintenance Costs ($)
30 (All)
Emission
Tune-up
22.45
6.65
29.11
1974 Model Phase
Correct
Disablement
1.35
0.28
1.63
I Vehicles
Recommended
Maintenance
3.69
3.58
7.27
Total
Labor 22.45 1.35 3.69 27.49
Parts 6.65 0.28 3.58 10.51
Total 29.11 1.63 7.27 38.01
Average Maintenance Costs ($)
27 (All) 1973 Model Phase I Vehicles
Emission Correct Recommended Total
Tune-up Disablement Maintenance
Labor 24.50 0.90 5.30 30.70
Parts 10.18 0.00 4.48 14.66
Total 34.68 0.90 9.78 45.36
Average Maintenance Costs ($)
les
Total
25 (All)
Emission
Tune-up
28.40
12.80
41.21
1972 Model Phase
Correct
Disablement
1.08
1.59
2.67
I Vehicles
Recommended
Maintenance
3.40
3.39
6.79
Labor 28.40 1.08 3.40 32.89
Parts 12.80 1.59 3.39 17-79
Total A1.21 7.A7 A 7Q 50.67
3-396
-------
Average Maintenance Costs ($)
Labor
Parts
Total
124 Failed
Emission
Tune-up
20.01
3.03
23.04
1975/1976 Phase I
Correct
Disablement
0.77
0.07
0.84
and II Vehicles
Recommended
Maintenance
3.19
1.51
4.70
Total
23.97
4.61
28.59
Average Maintenance Costs ($)
31 Failed 1974 Model Phase I and II Vehicles
Labor
Parts
Total
Emission
Tune-up
23.17
4.24
27.41
Correct
Disablement
1.05
0.37
1.42
Recommended Total
Maintenance
3.92 28.13
2.32 6.94
6.24 35.07
Average Maintenance Costs ($)
Labor
Parts
Total
53 Failed
Emission
Tune-up
24.55
6.91
31.47
1973 Model Phase I
Correct
Disablement
0.79
0.07
0.85
and II Vehicles
Recommended
Maintenance
4.05
3.84
7.89
Total
29.39
10.82
40.22
Average Maintenance Costs ($)
50 Failed 1972 Model Phase I and II Vehicles
Labor
Parts
Total
Emission
Tune-up
26.78
11.13
37.92
Correct
Disablement
0.99
1.58
2.57
Recommended
Maintenance
3.19
3.11
6.30
Total
30.96
15.83
46.78
3-397
-------
TABLE 24
SUMMARY OF MAINTENANCE COST
ON PHASE 1 PASSED VEHICLES
DKNVER
1975 & 1976 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
NU. ur
MANUFACTURER VEH
Ciru.oo.LUN v^unnciwi
TUNE UP MALADJUST / DISABLE
nQOUHMUNUaD
MAINTENANCE
, TOTALS
MANUFACTURER
AMER. MOTORS 2
TOTAL
CHRYSLER
TOTAL
FORD
TOTAL
LABOR
PARTS
COSTS
5
LABOR
PARTS
COSTS
20
LABOR
PARTS
COSTS
$8.10
$0.00
$8.10
$23.22
$0.24
$23.46
$17-82
$2.92
$20.74
$6.07
$0.00
$6.07
$8.64
$0.00
$8.64
$1.35
$0.00
$1.35
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$3-24
$1.13
$4.37
$5.13
$3.99
$9.12
$11.17
$0.00
$14.1?
$35.10
$1.37
$36.17
$21.30
$6.91
$31.21
GENERAL MOTORS 27
TOTAL
IMPORTS
TOTAL
LABOR
PARTS
COSTS
19
LABOR
PARTS
COSTS
$15.25
$2.53
$17-78
$11.79
$0.08
$11.88
$1.05
$0.00
$1.05
$3.84
$0.00
$3.84
$1.85
$1.28
$3-13
$5.54
$3.45
$8.99
$18.15
$3-81
$21.96
$21.1?
$3-53
$21. TO
ALL VEHICLES 73
TOTAL
LABOR COSTS
LABOR
PARTS
COSTS
: $13-50
$15.40
$1.77
$17.18
PER HOUR
$2.52
$0.00
$2.52
$3.75
$2.54
$6.30
$21.67
$1.31
$25-99
3-398
-------
TABLE 24 CONT'D
SUMMARY OP MAINTENANCE COST
ON PHASE 1 PASSED VEHICLES
DENVER
1974 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
NO. OF EMISSION CORRECT RECOMMENDED TOTALS
MANUFACTURER VEH TUNE UP MALADJUST / DISABLE MAINTENANCE MANUFACTURER
AMER. MOTORS 1
TOTAL
CHRYSLER
TOTAL
FORD
TOTAL
LABOR
PARTS
COSTS
2
LABOR
PARTS
COSTS
5
LABOR
PARTS
COSTS
$12.15
$8.83
$20.98
$31.05
$11.79
$42.83
$22.68
$4.43
$27.11
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$1.62
$0.00
$1.62
$13.50
$14.84
$28.34
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$25.65
$23.67
$49.32
$31.05
$11.79
$42.83
$24.30
$4.43
$28.73
GENERAL MOTORS 1 1
TOTAL
IMPORTS
TOTAL
ALL VEHICLES
TOTAL
I A
R COSTS
LABOR
PARTS
COSTS
3
LABOR
PARTS
COSTS
22
LABOR
PARTS
COSTS
•
: $13.50
$22.58
$11.39
$33.97
$21.15
$3.76
$24.91
$22.70
$8.68
$31.39
PER HOUR
$0.49
$0.00
$0.49
$3.60
$0.00
$3.60
$1.10
$0.00
$1.10
•»
$7.12
$6.50
$13-62
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$4.17
$3.92
$8.10
$30.19
$17.89
$48.08
$24.75
$3.76
$28.51
$27.98
$12.61
$40.59
3-399
-------
TABLE 24 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF MAINTENANCE COST
ON PHASE 1 PASSED VEHICLES
DENVER
1973 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
NO. OF EMISSION CORRECT RECOMMENDED
MANUFACTURER VEH TUNE UP MALADJUST / DISABLE MAINTENANCE
AMER. MOTORS 0
LABOR
PARTS
TOTAL COSTS
CHRYSLER 1
LABOR
PARTS
TOTAL COSTS
FORD 2
LABOR
PARTS
TOTAL COSTS
GENERAL MOTORS 11
LABOR
PARTS
TOTAL COSTS
IMPORTS 2
LABOR
PARTS
TOTAL COSTS
ALL VEHICLES 16
LABOR
PARTS
TOTAL COSTS
LABOR COSTS : $13-50 PER HOUR
TOTALS
MANUFACTURE
$29.70
$1.10
$30.80
$17.55
$2.89
$20.44
$24.05
$9.42
$33.48
$15.52
$0.30
$15.82
$22.53
$6.94
$29.47
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.86
$0.00
$0.86
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.59
$0.00
$0.59
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$7.36
$6.59
$13-96
$2.70
$0.00
$2.70
$5.40
$4.53
$9.93
$29.70
$1.10
$30.80
$17.55
$2.89
$20.11
$32.28
$16.02
$48.29
$18.22
$0.30
$18.52
$28.52
$11. 18
$110.00
3-400
-------
TABLE 24 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF MAINTENANCE COST
ON PHASE 1 PASSED VEHICLES
DENVER
1972 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
NO. OF EMISSION CORRECT RECOMMENDED TOTALS
MANUFACTURER VEH TUNE UP MALADJUST / DISABLE MAINTENANCE MANUFACTURER
AMER. MOTORS 0
LABOR
PARTS
TOTAL COSTS
CHRYSLER 1
LABOR
PARTS
TOTAL COSTS
FORD 5
LABOR
PARTS
TOTAL COSTS
GENERAL MOTORS 6
LABOR
PARTS
TOTAL COSTS
IMPORTS 2
LABOR
PARTS
TOTAL COSTS
ALL VEHICLES 1 4
LABOR
PARTS
TOTAL COSTS
*
LABOR COSTS :$13.50
$27.00
$1.21
$28.21
$18.09
$0.29
$18.38
$31.27
$14.60
$45.88
$27.00
$0.00
$27.00
$25.65
$6.45
$32.10
PER HOUR
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$1 .62
$0.00
$1 .62
$0.00
$0.00
$0 . 00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.58
$0.00
$0.58
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$6.75
$7.06
$13.81
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$2.41
$2.52
$4.93
$27.00
$1.21
$28.21
$26.46
$7.35
$33-81
$31.27
$14.60
$45.88
$27.00
$0.00
$27.00
$28.64
$8.97
$37.61
3-401
-------
TABLE 24 CONT'D
• t
SUMMARY OF MAINTENANCE COST
ON ALL PHASE 1 VEHICLES
DENVER
1975 & 1976 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
NU. Uf
MANUFACTURER VEH
KMiiiiUN uunn&oi
TUNE UP MALADJUST / DISABLE
MAINTENANCE
TOTALS
MANUFACTURES
AMER. MOTORS 6
TOTAL
CHRYSLER
TOTAL
FORD
TOTAL
LABOR
PARTS
COSTS
15
LABOR
PARTS
COSTS
25
LABOR
PARTS
COSTS
$8.10
$0.91
$9-01
$20.34
$5.37
$25.71
$17.33
$2.66
$20.00
$3.60
$0.00
$3.60
$4.41
$0.00
$4.41
$2.27
$0.34
$2.61
$1.80
$0.00
$1.80
$4.50
$2.20
$6.70
$4.64
$3-19
$7.84
$13-50
$0.91
$1U1
$29.25
$7.56
$36.81
$2i25
$6.20
$30.«
GENERAL MOTORS 40
TOTAL
IMPORTS
TOTAL
LABOR
PARTS
COSTS
26
LABOR
PARTS
COSTS
$14.95
$2.93
$17.88
$13.55
$0.15
$13.71
$1.35
$0.00
$1.35
$2.80
$0.00
$2.80
$1.59
$0.89
$2.48
$5.30
$3.46
$8.76
$17-89
$3.82
$21.71
$21-65
$3.62
$25-27
ALL VEHICLES 112
TOTAL
LABOR COSTS
LABOR
PARTS
COSTS
: $13.50
$15.51
$2.44
$17-96
PER HOUR
$2.42
$0.08
$2.50
$3.53
$2.13
$5.66
$21."
$11.65
$26-12
3-402
-------
TABLE 24 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF MAINTENANCE COST
ON ALL PHASE 1 VEHICLES
DENVER
1974 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
NO OF EMISSION CORRECT RECOMMENDED TOTALS
MANUFACTURER VEH TUNE UP MALADJUST / DISABLE MAINTENANCE MANUFACTURER
AMER. MOTORS 1
TOTAL
CHRYSLER
TOTAL
FORD
TOTAL
LABOR
PARTS
COSTS
4
LABOR
PARTS
COSTS
7
LABOR
PARTS
COSTS
$12.15
$8.83
$20.98
$22.61
$7.44
$30.05
$21.99
$3-16
$25.15
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$3.47
$1.19
$4.66
$13.50
$14.84
$28.34
$2.36
$2.65
$5.01
$0.58
$0.30
$0.88
$25.65
$23.67
$49.32
$24.97
$10.09
$35.06
$26.04
$4.66
$30.69
GENERAL MOTORS 1 3
TOTAL
IMPORTS
TOTAL
LABOR
PARTS
COSTS
5
LABOR
PARTS
COSTS
$23-47
$9.73
$33.20
$22.41
$2.48
$24.89
$0.42
$0.00
$0.42
$2.16
$0.00
$2.16
$6.44
$6.15
$12.59
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$30.32
$15.88
$46.20
$24.57
$2.48
$27.05
ALL VEHICLES 30
TOTAL
LABOR
PARTS
COSTS
$22.45
$6.65
$29.11
$1.35
$0.28
$1.63
$3-69
$3-58
$7.27
$27.49
$10.51
$38.01
UBO« COSTS : $13.50 pER
3-403
-------
TABLE 24 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF MAINTENANCE COST
ON ALL PHASE 1 VEHICLES
DENVER
1973 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
NU. ur
MANUFACTURER VEH
Cim.ooJ.uiM ounnciui nd^unn&riusLu
TUNE UP MALADJUST / DISABLE MAINTENANCE
TOTALS
MANUFACTUREl
AMER. MOTORS 1
TOTAL
CHRYSLER
TOTAL
FORD
TOTAL
LABOR
PARTS
COSTS
3
LABOR
PARTS
COSTS
6
LABOR
PARTS
COSTS
$27.00
$7.63
$34.63
$24.30
$11.97
$36.27
$25.20
$6.41
$31.61
$8.10
$0.00
$8.10
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$1.12
$0.00
$1.12
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$1 .80
$0.00
$1 .80
$1 .80
$1.70
$3.50
$35.10
$7.63
$42.?3
$26.10
$11.9?
$38.0?
$28.12
$8.10
$36.23
GENERAL MOTORS 12
TOTAL
IMPORTS
TOTAL
ALL VEHICLES
TOTAL
LABOR COSTS
LABOR
PARTS
COSTS
5
LABOR
PARTS
COSTS
27
LABOR
PARTS
COSTS
: $13.50
$25.87
$11.76
$37.63
$19.98
$10.38
$30.36
$24.50
$10.18
$34.68
PER HOUR
$0.79
$0.00
$0.79
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.90
$0.00
$0.90
$6.75
$6.05
$12.79
$9.18
$7.64
$16.82
$5.30
$4.48
$9-78
$33-11
$17-80
$51-21
$29.1^
$18.01
$47."
$30.?0
$11.6
$45-36
3-404
-------
TABLE 24 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF MAINTENANCE COST
ON ALL PHASE 1 VEHICLES
DENVER
1972 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
NO. OF EMISSION CORRECT RECOMMENDED TOTALS
MANUFACTURER VEH TUNE UP MALADJUST / DISABLE MAINTENANCE MANUFACTURER
AMER. MOTORS 1
TOTAL
CHRYSLER
TOTAL
FORD
TOTAL
LABOR
PARTS
COSTS
3
LABOR
PARTS
COSTS
6
LABOR
PARTS
COSTS
$28.35
$24.31
$52.66
$29.25
$18.53
$47.78
$19.35
$3.42
$22.77
$8.10
$0.00
$8.10
$0.45
$1.25
$1.70
$2.92
$6.01
$8.94
$4.05
$0.00
$4.05
$3.60
$4.84
$8.44
$5.63
$5.88
$11.50
$40.50
$24.31
$64.81
$33-30
$24.63
$57.93
$27.90
$15.32
$43.22
GENERAL MOTORS 1 1
TOTAL
IMPORTS
TOTAL
LABOR
PARTS
COSTS
4
LABOR
PARTS
COSTS
$32.40
$18.43
$50.83
$30.37
$4.22
$34.59
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$3-31
$3-18
$6.49
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$35.71
$21.61
$57.33
$30.37
$4.22
$34.59
ALL VEHICLES 25
TOTAL
LABOR
PARTS
COSTS
$28.40
$12.80
$41.21
$1.08
$1.59
$2.67
$3.40
$3.39
$6.79
$32.89
$17.79
$50.67
3-405
-------
TABLE 24 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF MAINTENANCE COST
ON ALL FAILED VEHICLES
DENVER
1975 & 1976 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
NO- Ot
MANUFACTURER VEH
fcrussiuw uunntui,
TUNE UP MALADJUST / DISABLE
nn^uranawuiiU
MAINTENANCE
TOTALS
MANUFACTURE!
AMER. MOTORS 9
TOTAL
CHRYSLER
TOTAL
FORD
TOTAL
LABOR
PARTS
COSTS
29
LABOR
PARTS
COSTS
16
LABOR
PARTS
COSTS
$21.60
$7-77
$29-37
$22.11
$3.46
$25.57
$19.24
$1.44
$20.68
$1.05
$0.00
$1.05
$0.93
$0.00
$0.93
$2.11
$0.53
$2.64
$1.20
$0.00
$1.20
$2.14
$1.11
$3-25
$2.95
$0.47
$3-42
$23.85
$7.??
$31.62
$25.18
$1.5?
$29.76
$24.30
$2.11
$26.71
GENERAL MOTORS 56
TOTAL
IMPORTS
TOTAL
LABOR
PARTS
COSTS
14
LABOR
PARTS
COSTS
$19-26
$3.22
$22.48
$18.51
$0.17
$18.69
$0.46
$0.00
$0.46
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$4.17
$2.20
$6.37
$2.99
$1.76
$4.74
$23-89
$5-12
$29-31
$21-50
$1.93
$23-13
ALL VEHICLES 124
TOTAL
LABOR COSTS
LABOR
PARTS
COSTS
• $13.50
$20.01
$3.03
$23.04
PER HOUR
$0.77
$0.07
$0.84
$3-19
$1.51
$4.70
$23-9^
$11.61
$28.59
3-A06
-------
TABLE 24 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF MAINTENANCE COST
ON ALL FAILED VEHICLES
DENVER
1974 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
NO OF EMISSION
MANUFACTURER VEH TUNE UP
CORRECT RECOMMENDED
MALADJUST / DISABLE MAINTENANCE
TOTALS
MANUFACTURER
AMER. MOTORS 1
TOTAL
CHRYSLER
TOTAL
FORD
TOTAL
LABOR
PARTS
COSTS
6
LABOR
PARTS
COSTS
8
LABOR
PARTS
COSTS
$33-75
$6.82
$40.57
$19.35
$3-30
$22.65
$22.27
$1.35
$23-63
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$2.02
$0.52
$2.54
$2.02
$1.04
$3.07
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$5.85
$5.00
$10.85
$2.19
$0.27
$2.46
$33-75
$6.82
$40.57
$27.22
$8.82
$36.04
$26.49
$2.66
$29.16
GENERAL MOTORS 9
TOTAL
IMPORTS
TOTAL
ALL VEHICLES
TOTAL
LABOR
PARTS
COSTS
7
LABOR
PARTS
COSTS
31
LABOR
PARTS
COSTS
$31.35
$9.38
$40.73
$15.43
$1.37
$16.80
$23-17
$4.24
$27.41
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.58
$0.00
$0.58
$1.05
$0.37
$1.42
$1.05
$1.85
$2.90
$8.49
$3-33
$11.82
$3.92
$2.32
$6.24
$32.40
$11.23
$43.63
$24.49
$4.70
$29.20
$28.13
$6.94
$35.07
3-407
-------
TABLE 24 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF MAINTENANCE COST
ON ALL FAILED VEHICLES
DENVER
1973 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
NO OF EMISSION CORRECT RECOMMENDED TQTAK
MANUFACTURER VEH TUNE UP MALADJUST / DISABLE MAINTENANCE MANUFACTURE
AMER. MOTORS 2
LABOR
PARTS
TOTAL COSTS
CHRYSLER 13
LABOR
PARTS
TOTAL COSTS
FORD 14
LABOR
PARTS
TOTAL COSTS
GENERAL MOTORS 12
LABOR
PARTS
TOTAL COSTS
IMPORTS 12
LABOR
PARTS
TOTAL COSTS
ALL VEHICLES 53
LABOR
PARTS
TOTAL COSTS
$19-57
$3-81
$23-39
$21.70
$4.85
$26.56
$22.56
$5.90
$28.47
$29.59
$11.04
$40.63
$25.76
$6.72
$32.48
$24.55
$6.91
$31.47
$4.05
$0.00
$4.05
$1.56
$0.27
$1.82
$0.48
$0.00
$0.48
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.56
$0.00
$0.56
$0.79
$0.07
$0.85
$6.75
$0.61
$7-36
$1.97
$1.91
$3.88
$6.65
$5.56
$12.21
$3-49
$5.13
$8.62
$3-37
$3-18
$6.56
$4.05
$3.84
$7-89
$30.3?
*Uj
$31.80
$25.2-
$7.0]
$32.2o
$29.7;
$11.40
$il1.1o
$33-01
$16.17
$119.2-
$29-10
$9-90
« Lft
$39.&°
i29-39
y£- / *
i,n W
$1U'W
. i.rt 5?
$10.''
LABOR COSTS : $13.50 PER HOUR
3-408
-------
TABLE 24 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF MAINTENANCE COST
ON ALL FAILED VEHICLES
DENVER
1972 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES
NO. OF EMISSION CORRECT RECOMMENDED TOTALS
MANUFACTURER VEH TUNE UP MALADJUST / DISABLE MAINTENANCE MANUFACTURER
AMER. MOTORS 2
TOTAL
CHRYSLER
TOTAL
FORD
TOTAL
LABOR
PARTS
COSTS
10
LABOR
PARTS
COSTS
14
LABOR
PARTS
COSTS
$29.70
$12.15
$41.85
$26.59
$12.65
$39.24
$25.65
$13.12
$38.77
$4.05
$0.00
$4.05
$0.13
$0.38
$0.51
$2.84
$5.38
$8.23
$2.02
$0.00
$2.02
$1.08
$1.45
$2.53
$0.77
$1.69
$2.47
$35.77
$12.15
$47.93
$27.81
$14.48
$42.29
$29-27
$20.19
$49.46
GENERAL MOTORS 16
TOTAL
IMPORTS
TOTAL
LABOR
PARTS
COSTS
8
LABOR
PARTS
COSTS
$26.58
$9.21
$35.78
$28.69
$9.36
$38.04
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$5.40
$6.09
$11.49
$5.91
$2.49
$8.39
$31.98
$15.30
$47.28
$34.59
$11.85
$46.44
^ VEHICLES 50
TOTAL
LftBOH COSTS
LABOR
PARTS
COSTS
: $13 £?n
$26.78
$11.13
$37.92
DC"D tir»rtr>
$0.99
$1.58
$2.57
$3.19
$3.11
$6.30
$30.96
$15.83
$46.78
3-409
-------
3.7.9 Vehicles Meeting Federal Exhaust Emission Standards
After Maintenance
Summary data on Denver Inspection/Maintenance Task vehicles relative
to the 1975/1976, 1973/1974 and 1972 Federal Exhaust Emission Standards
are presented on the six pages comprising Table 25 which follows.
These data, presented for these vehicles before and after the study-
related maintenance, are further summarized below.
3-A10
-------
Vehicles Meeting 1975/1976 Standards
rendition
As-Rec'd
After Mtce,
Condition
As-Rec'd
After Mtce.
Condition
As-Rec'd
After Mtce.
As-Rec'd
Mtce.
73 Passed 1975/1976 Model Phase I Vehicles
HC CO NOxc
r<1.5 gm/mi) (£15 Rm/mi) (<3.1 gm/ini)
TNo.V (!%) (No.) (%) (No.) (%)
35 47. 9 12 16.4 70 95.9
44 60.3 15 20.5 71 97.3
Vehicles Meeting 1974 Standards
22 Passed 1974 Model Phase I Vehicles
HC CO NOXC
(<3.4 gin/mi) (<39 gin/mi) (*3.0 gin/mi)
(No.) (%) (No.) (%) (No.) (%)
2 9.1 0 0.0 20 90.9
2 9.1 0 0.0 19 86.4
Vehicles Meeting 1973 Standards
16 Passed 1973 Model Phase I Vehicles
HC CO NOXC
(<3.4 gin/mi) (<39 gin/mi) (13.0 gin/mi)
(No.) (%) (No.) (%) (No.) (%)
3 18.8 0 0.0 14 87.5
5 31.3 2 12.5 14 87.5
Vehicles Meeting 1972 Standards
J.4 Passed 1972 Model Phase I Vehicles
HC CO
ts3.4 gm/mi) (<39 gin/mi) Passed
CNo.) (%) (NO.) (%) (No.)
0 0.0 0 0.0 0
1 7.1 0 0.0 0
Passed
All Three
(No.) (%)
9 12.3
12 16.4
Passed
All Three
(No.) (%)
0 0.0
0 0.0
Passed
All Three
(No.) (%)
0 0.0
0 0.0
Both
(%)
0.0
0.0
3-411
-------
Vehicles Meeting 1975/1976 Standards
112 (All) 1975/1976 Model Phase I Vehicles
HC
CO
NOXC
Condition
As-Rec'd
After Mtce.
(£1.5 ^ra/mi)
(No.) (%)
37 33.0
56 50.0
(<15 gm/mi)
(No.) (%)
12 10.7
18 16.1
(S3.1 gm/mi)
(No.) (%)
107 95.5
110 98.2
Passed
8,0
13,4
Condition
As-Rec'd
After Mtce.
Vehicles Meeting 1974 Standards
30 (All) 1974 Model Phase I Vehicles
HC
CO
NOxc
Passed
(*3.4 gm/mi)
(No.)
3
3
(%)
10.0
10.0
(^39 gm/mi)
(No.)
0
0
(%)
0.0
0.0
(£3.0 gm/mi)
(No.)
28
27
(%)
93.3
90.0
All Three
(No.)
0
0
U)
0,0
0,0
Vehicles Meeting 1973 Standards
Condition
As-Rec
After
•d
Mtce.
27
(^3
(No
3
7
(All) 1973
HC
.4 gm/mi)
.) (%)
11.
25.
1
9
Model
(<39
(No.)
0
2
Phase
CO
gm/mi)
I Vehicles
NOxc
(%)
0.0
7.4
(^3
(No
23
23
.0
.)
gm/mi)
!%L
85.2
85.2
Passed
All Three^
0 0,1
o 0,1
Condition
As-Rec'd
After Mtce,
Vehicles Meeting 1972 Standards
25 (All) 1972 Model Phase I Vehicles
HC
(^3.4
(No.)
0
3
gm/mi)
!£L
o.o
12.0
CO
(<39 gm/mi)
iNo._) (%)
0
0
0.0
0.0
3-412
-------
Vehicles Meeting 1975/1976 Standards
1
Condition
As-Recfd
After Mtce
Condition
As-Rec'd
After Mtce
Condition
74 Failed 1975/1976 Model Phase I and II Vehicles
HC CO N0xr
(£1.5 gm/mi) (^15 gm/mi) (<3.1 fpn/mi)
(No.) " railed 1972 Model Phase I and II Vehicles
HC CO
• ^3. 4 gm/mi) (<39 gm/mi) Passed
(No.) (%) (No.) (Z) (NO.)
As-Rec'd
After Mtce °-° l 2-° °
e" 3 6.0 4 8.0 1
Passed
All Three
(No.) (%)
0 0.0
4 3.2
Passed
All Three
(No.) (%)
0 0.0
0 0.0
Passed
All Three
(No.) (%)
0 0.0
2 3.8
Both
(%)
0.0
2.0
3-413
-------
TABLE 25
SUMMARY OF PHASE 1 PAS§DRVEHICLESNMEETING FEDERAL STANDARDS
DENVER
MODEL NO. OF
YEAR / MAFCE VEH
1975 & 1976
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
TOTAL
1974
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
TOTAL
1973
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
TOTAL
1972
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
TOTAL
2
5
20
27
19
73
1
2
5
11
3
22
0
1
2
11
2
16
0
1
5
6
2
14
< 1.5
~ NO.
2
1
13
14
5
35
< 3.4
NO.
0
0
0
2
0
2
0
0
0
2
1
3
HC
GM/MI
%
100.0
20.0
65.0
51.9
26.3
47.9
HC
GM/MI
%
0.0
0.0
0.0
18.2
0.0
9-1
0.0
0.0
0.0
18.2
50.0
18.8
< 3.4
NO
0
0
0
0
0
0
< 15
NO
2
0
1
7
2
12
< 39
NO
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
HC
GM/MI
. %
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
CO
GM/MI
. %
100
0
5
25
10
16
CO
.0
.0
.0
• 9
.5
.4
NOXC
< 3-1 GM/MI
NO. %
1
5
20
26
18
70
50.
100.
100.
96.
94.
95.
0
0
0
3
7
9
NOXC
GM/MI
.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
%
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
< 3.0
NO.
1
2
5
9
3
20
0
0
2
10
2
14
GM/MI
%
100.
100.
100.
81.
100.
90.
0.
0.
100.
90.
100.
87-
t
0
0
0
8
0
9
0
0
0
9
0
5
CO
4 39 GM/MI
NO.
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
%
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
PASSED
ALL t»
1
0
1
6
1
9
***»•
50.0
0.0
5.0
22.2
5-3
12.3
PASSED
ALL THREE
NO.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
PASSED
af\
NO.
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
F
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
o.o
0.0
0.0
fl.O
o.o
o.o
o.o
o.o
BOTH
n n
O.v
- A
o.o
A n
o.o
. n
fl.O
n f
O.ii
o.o
3-414
-------
TABLE 25 CONT 'D
SUMMARY OF PHASE 1 PASSED VEHICLES MEETING FEDERAL STANDARDS
SUMMAKi u
DENVER
MODEL N0 OF
SB / MAKE VEH
~1975 & 1976
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
TOTAL
1974
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
TOTAL
1973
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORT.;
TOTAL
2
5
20
27
19
73
1
2
5
11
3
22
0
1
2
11
2
16
<. 1-
NO
2
3
17
18
4
44
< 3
NO
0
0
0
2
0
2
0
0
0
4
1
5
HC
5 GM/MI
100.0
60.0
85-0
66-7
21.1
60.3
HC
4 GM/MI
%
0-0
0 0
0.0
18-2
0.0
9 1
0.0
0 0
0.0
36.4
50 0
31-3
c
<. 15
NO.
2
1
3
7
2
15
:o
GM/MI
100.
20.
15.
25.
10.
20.
0
0
0
9
5
5
CO
1 39
NO.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
2
GM/MI
%
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
18.
0.
12.
i
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
5
HC
1972
AMER MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORT^
TOTAL
0
5
6
2
14
< 3-4
NO.
0
0
1
0
0
1
GM/MI
-------
TABLE 25 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF ALL PHASE 1 VEHICLES MEETING FEDERAL STANDARDS
BEFORE MAINTENANCE HKUS
DKNVER
MODEL NO. OF
YEAR / MAKE VEH
1975 & 1976
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
TOTAL
1974
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
TOTAL
1973
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
TOTAL
6
15
25
40
26
112
1
4
7
13
5
30
1
3
6
12
5
27
< 1.
NO
2
1
14
15
5
37
< 3.
NO
0
0
0
3
0
3
0
0
0
2
1
3
nu
5 GM/MI
33.3
6.7
56.0
37.5
19-2
33.0
HC
4 GM/MI
%
0.0
0.0
0.0
23.1
0.0
10.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
16.7
20.0
11.1
< 15
NO
2
0
1
7
2
12
< 39
NO
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
OVJ
GM/MI
33
0
4
17
7
10
CO
.3
.0
.0
.5
.7
.7
GM/MI
.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
<£
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
HC
^3.4 GM/MI <
1972
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
TOTAL
1
3
6
11
4
25
NO,
0
0
0
0
0
0
%
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
< 3.
NO
3
15
25
39
25
107
< 3 •
NO
1
4
7
11
5
28
0
1
6
11
5
23
NUAO
1 GM/MI
50.
100.
100.
97.
96.
95.
NOXC
0
0
0
5
2
5
PASSED
1
0
1
6
1
9
16,1
0.0
1.0
15.0
3.8
8.0
PASSED
0 GM/MI
%
100.
100.
100.
84.
100.
93.
0.
33-
100.
91.
100.
85.
0
0
0
6
0
3
0
3
0
7
0
2
CO
39 GM/MI
NO.
0
0
0
0
0
0
%
0.0
o.o
o.o
0.0
o.o
o.o
ALL THREE
NO.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
PASSED
urt
NU-
0
0
0
0
0
0
{
r
0.0
0.0
0.0
o.o
0.0
o.o
o.o
0.0
o.o
o.o
o.o
o.o
BOT8
J
A ft
O.v
o.o
o.o
A
o.o
o.
3-416
-------
TABLE 25 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF ALL PHASE 1 VEHICLES MEETING FEDERAL STANDARDS
SUM" AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
unnFI NO OF
ff/ MAKE VEH
"l975~& 1976
AMBR. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
TOTAL
1971
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
TOTAL
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
TOTAL
6
15
25
40
26
112
1
4
7
13
5
30
1
3
6
12
5
27
< 1.
~~ NO
2
7
19
23
5
56
1 3-
NO
0
1
0
2
0
3
1
1
0
4
1
7
HC
5 GM/MI
33
46
76
57
19
50
HC
.3
• 7
-0
-5
2
.0
4 GM/MI
0
25
0
15
0
10
100
33
0
33
20
25
%
.0
.0
.0
.4
0
.0
.0
• 3
0
• 3
.0
.9
CO
< 15 GM/MI
"NO %
2 33-
3
4
7
2
18
1 39
NO
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
2
20.
16.
17.
7-
16.
CO
3
0
0
5
7
1
NOXC
< 3-1 GM/MI
~ NO. %
5
15
25
39
26
110
83-3
100.0
100.0
97-5
100.0
98.2
NOXC
GM/MI
%
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
16.
0.
7.
i
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
7
0
4
HC
< 3
4
1972 NO.
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
G£NERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
TOTAL
1
6
11
25
1
0
2
0
0
3
GM/MI
%
100 0
0 0
33.3
0 0
Q 0
12.0
< 3-0
NO.
0
4
7
11
5
27
1
1
5
11
5
23
CO
GM/MI
%
0.0
100.0
100.0
84.6
100.0
90.0
100.0
33-3
83-3
91 7
100.0
85.2
< 39 GM/MI
NO. %
0 0.
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0.
0 0
0
0
J
0
0
0
PASSED
ALL THREE
NO. %
1
3
4
7
0
15
16.7
20.0
16.0
17-5
0.0
13-4
PASSED
ALL
NO.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
THREE
«j
0.0
o.o
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
PASSED BOTH
NO.
0
0
0
0
0
0
%
0 0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
3-417
-------
TABLE 25 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF ALL FAILED VEHICLES MEETING FEDERAL STANDARDS
BEFORE MAINTENANCE!
DENVER
MODEL NO. OF
YEAR / MAKE VEH
1975 & 1976
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
TOTAL
1974
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
TOTAL
1973
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
TOTAL
1972
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
TOTAL
9
29
16
56
14
124
1
6
8
9
7
31
2
13
14
12
12
53
2
10
14
16
8
50
< 1.5
NO.
0
0
1
1
0
2
1 3.4
NO.
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
1
0
2
3
no
GM/MI
%
0.0
0.0
6.3
1.8
0.0
1.6
HC
GM/MI
%
0.0
0.0
0.0
11.1
0.0
3.2
0.0
0.0
7-1
0.0
16.7
5.7
< 3.4
NO
0
0
0
0
0
0
i>
< 15
NO.
0
0
1
0
0
1
w
GM/MI
%
0.0
0.0
6.3
0.0
0.0
0.8
<
CO
< 39
NO.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
HC
GM/MI
• %
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
GM/MI
%
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
8.3
1.9
<
<
39
NO
0
0
0
0
1
1
w
3.1
NO.
7
29
16
56
14
122
UAO
GM/MI
%
77
100
100
100
100
98
.8
.0
.0
.0
.0
.4
NOXC
3.0
NO.
1
4
7
9
7
28
1
10
13
12
12
48
CO
GM/MI
100
66
87
100
100
90
50
76
92
100
100
90
%
.0
.7
.5
.0
.0
• 3
.0
.9
.9
.0
.0
.6
GM/MI
•
0
0
0
0
12
2
%
.0
.0
.0
.0
.5
.0
PASSED
ALL THREE
NO. j
0
0
0
0
0
0
""""*••
0.0
o.o
o.o
o.o
0.0
0.0
PASSED
ALL
NO.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
n A CCI
PASbl
tin
NU.
0
0
0
0
0
0
'THREE
j
p
0.0
o.o
0.0
o.o
0.0
o.o
o.o
o.o
o.o
o.o
o.o
o.o
an BOTH
BDPj
n 0
O-li
A
o.o
A rt
o.o
Of
•C
n II
0-u
3-418
-------
TABLE 25 CONT'D
OF ALL FAILED VEHICLES MEETING FEDERAL STANDARDS
DENVER
unnFl NO. OF
ff/ MAKE VEH
"1975"* 1976
AMER MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
TOTAL
1974
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
TOTAL
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
TOTAL
9
29
16
56
14
124
1
6
8
9
7
31
2
13
14
12
12
53
<> 1-5
NO.
0
11
5
26
1
43
JC 3.4
NO.
0
1
0
1
1
3
1
3
0
1
3
8
HC
GM/MI
0-0
37-9
31-3
46.4
7-1
34.7
HC
GM/MI
%
0 0
16.7
0.0
11.1
14.3
9-7
50.0
23-1
0.0
8.3
25.0
15.1
CO
< 15 GM/MI
NO. %
0
2
2
0
0
4
_< 39
NO
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
1
1
0
1
3
0.0
6.9
12.5
0.0
0.0
3.2
CO
GM/MI
%
0.0
0.0
12.5
0.0
0.0
3-2
0.0
7-7
7.1
0.0
8.3
5.7
HC
1972
AMER. MOTORS
CHRYSLER
FORD
GENERAL MOTORS
IMPORTS
-*
TOTAL
2
10
14
16
50
S 3-4
NO.
1
0
1
0
1
3
GM/MI
%
50.0
0.0
7. 1
I • •
0.0
12.5
6.0
<
<
NOXC
3.1 GM/MI
NO. %
9
29
16
56
14
124
100.
100.
100.
100.
100.
100.
0
0
0
0
0
0
NOXC
i
3.0
NO.
1
5
8
9
7
30
1
11
13
11
12
48
GM/MI
%
100.
83-
100.
100.
100.
96.
50.
84.
92.
91.
100.
90.
0
3
0
0
0
8
0
6
9
7
0
6
PASSED
ALL THREE
NO. %
0
2
2
0
0
4
0.0
6.9
12.5
0.0
0.0
3.2
PASSED
ALL
NO.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
2
THREE
%
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
7.7
0.0
0.0
8.3
3-8
CO
39
NO
0
0
1
0
3
4
GM/MI
%
0.
o.
7.
0
37.
8.
0
0
1
0
5
0
PASSED BOTH
NO.
0
0
0
0
1
1
%
0.0
0.0
0 0
0.0
12 5
2 0
3-419
-------
3.7.10 Vehicles Failing Idle Inspection Test Hydrocarbon and Carhnn
Monoxide Standards
Data relating to the number and percentage of both Phase I and
Phase II vehicles which failed the Inspection Test are presented on
the one page comprising Table 26 which follows this paragraph.
3-420
-------
TABLE 26
SUMMARY OF ALL VEHICLES FAILING
HYDROCARBON AND CARBON MONOXIDE BY MODEL-YEAR
UTILIZING THE IDLE INSPECTION TEST
DENVER
MODEL TEST NO. OF
YEAR SEQUENCE VEH
HC
CO
NO.
NO.
BOTH
NO.
1975
1974
1973
1972
TOTAL
1975
1974
1973
1972
PHASE
PHASE
PHASE
PHASE
PHASE
PHASE
PHASE
PHASE
PHASE
I
I
I
I
I
II
II
II
II
39
8
11
1 1
69
85
23
42
39
3
1
1
1
6
5
8
1 1
9
7
12
9
9
8
5
34
26
23
.7
.5
.1
. 1
.7
.9
.8
.2
.1
29
7
9
3
48
41
7
20
17
74
87
81
27
69
48
30
47
43
.4
.5
.8
.3
.6
.2
.4
.6
.6
7
0
1
7
15
39
8
1 1
13
17.
0.
9.
63.
21 .
45.
34.
26.
33.
9
0
1
6
7
9
8
2
3
TOTAL PHASE II
189
33 17.5
85 45.0
71 37.6
TOTAL PHASE I & n 258
39 15.1
133 51.6
86 33.3
FAILURE LIMITS :
HC?> ?Rn9!6 MO°EL-YEAR VEHICLES
^50 PPM (HEXANE), CO > 2.0 % (MOLE)
197?
HC > i"nl9IlM°DEL-YEAR VEHICLES
"00 PP* (HEXANE), CO > 5.5 % (MOLE)
3-421
-------
3-422
-------
APPENDICES
-------
APPENDIX A
-------
APPENDIX A - LISTING OF VEHICLE AND TEST PARAMETERS
Legend
- Vehicle Number
YEAR - Modcl Year
- Vehicle Make
- Vehicle Model
C - Number of Cylinders or Rotors
CID - Engine Displacement in Cubic Inches
V - Number of Carburetor Venturis (0: Fuel Injection)
T - Type of Transmission (1: Automatic; 2: Semi-Automatic; 3: 3-Speed
Manual; 4: 4-Speed Manual; 5: 5-Speed Manual)
FT - Fuel Tank Capacity in Gallons
RPMR - Idle RPM, at normal idle, as received from owner
RPMS - Idle RPM, specs normal idle as specified by manufacturer
RPMA - Idle RPM, measured with transmission in neutral after maintenance
(-: No Maintenance Performed)
DR - Ignition point dwell in degrees, as received front owner
(99: electronic ignition)
Ds - Ignition point dwell in degrees, spec (99: electronic ignition)
°A - Ignition point dwell in degrees, after maintenance (99: electronic
ignition; -: No Maintenance Performed)
IGR . Ignition timing in degrees, as received (+ indicates before top
dead center; - indicates after top dead center; 000 indicates top
dead center)
TgO
Ignition timing in degrees, spec (+ Indicates before top dead
center; - indicates after top dead center; 000 indicates top
dead center)
ICA
Ignition timing in degrees, after maintenance (+ indicates before
top dead center; - indicates after top dead center; 000 indicates
C°P dead center; -: No Maintenance Performed)
Tlip
Idle Hydrocarbon Emissions in PPM/Hexane before maintenance,
transmission as specified by manufacturer
A-l
-------
IHCA - Idle Hydrocarbon Emissions in PPM/Haxane after restorative
maintenance, transmission i in neutral (-: No Maintenance Perfom
ICO - Idle Carbon Monoxide in %, before maintenance, transmission
as specified by manufacturer
ICOS - Idle Carbon Monoxide in %, specs (99.9: indicates no specified
setting
ICOA - Idle Carbon Monoxide in %, transmission in neutral, after
maintenance (-: No Maintenance Performed)
INRT - Dynamometer Inertia Weight Setting (-: Dynamometer test not
performed)
RLHP - Road Load Horsepower Setting (-: Dynamometer test not performed)
L - Was 10% RLHP added to simulate air conditioning (1: Yes; 2: No)
P - PCV system present (1: Yea; 2: No)
CS - Vehicle equipped with Canister Storage Evaporative Emissions
Control (1: Yes; 2: No)
CC - Vehicle equipped with Crankcase Storage Evaporative Emissions
Control (1: Yes; 2: No)
AP - Vehicle equipped with Air Pump (1: Yes; 2: No)
A-2
-------
APPENDIX A
LISTING OF VEHICLES AND TEST PARAMETERS
DENVER
TO K»B MAKE
HODL C CID V T FT RPMR RPMS RPMA DR DS DA IGR IGS IGA IHC IHCA ICO ICOS ICOA INRT RLHP L P CS CC AP
""""""~ — - — ~~-
TRUC 8
THUC 8
TRUC 8
TRUC 8
?
20 0820 0800
20 0660 0600
26 0670 0800
20 0575 0600
1075 DODG TRUC
i !W2 i~!S TROC
TROC
TRUC
175 uuuw
[ 1975 FORD
! 975 FORD
I 1975 FORD
1 23
4 17
1 19
1 18
0780 0750 —
0880 0850 —
0670 0650 ~
0645 0650 ~
TRUC 8 351 2
TRUC 8 350 4
HORN 6 258 1
CNTY 8 350 2
RIVI 8 455 4
HEGA 8 350 4
ELDO 8 500 4
VEGA 4 140 1
0 5 MflB
012 1§75 BUIC
an 1975 BUIC
0 t 975 BUIC
05 975 CADI
06 1975 CHEV
01
01- .
019 1
020 1
021 1975 CHEV STAW 8 400 4
022 1975 CHRY NBWP 8 400 2
1975 DODG CORO 8 318 2
025 1975 DODG DART 6 225 1
FORD MUST 4 140 _
FORD TORI 8 351 2
1 20 0610 0650 ~
1 20 0610 0600 --
1 16 0710 0550 0660
1 22 0550 0600 0600
+02 +02
+15 +06 -
+07 +06
+20 +06
+08 000 -
+12 +06 -
+12 +12 -
- +14 +08
}9 — +25 +08
)9 — +08 +06 -
,. J9 99 +15 +03 +OJ
99 99 99 +11 +12 +12
1 26 0710 0600 0690 99
1 22 0560 0600 0750 99
1 28 0600 0600 0740 99
3 16 0840 0700 0700 99
1975 CHEV NOVA 6 250 1
975 CHEV MONT 8 350 2
CHEV CAPR 8 550 2
CHEV IMPA 8 350 2
1 27 070
1 26 084
1 16 071
2 4 13 0840 0850 0850 9
27 0580 0650 0820
FORD GRAN 6 250 1 1 19 0580 6600 0770
FORD LTD 8 351 2 1 24 0650 0650 0850
§1975 FORD LTD 8
1975 MERC HARQ 8
1975 HSRC HONG 8
1975 OLDS DELT 8
400 2 1 24 0680 0700 0850 99 99 99 +06 +06 +06
400 2 1 25 0640 0700 0930 99 §9 99 +18 +08 +08
351 2 1 27 0600 0650 0850 99 99 99 +18 +08 +08
350 4 1 26 0610 0550 0630 99 99 99 +20 +20 +20
1975 OLDS CUTL 8 350
1975 OLDS DELT 8 455
1975 PLIM FUR! 8
1975 PLYH DUST 6
4 1 2;
4 1 2
2 1 21
25 1 3
540 0550 0760
700 0550 0680
00 0750
16 0810 0800
§1975 PONT CATA 8 400 2
1975 PONT LENA 8 350 2
1975 PONT GRNV 8 455 4
1976 CAPH SEDA 4 140 2
0}1 1975 DATS B210 4
OJ2 1975 BOND SEDA 4
°,5| !2!5 TOM WHO 4
1 26 0730 0650 0830
1 21 0450 0600 0770
1 26 0600 0650 0810
4 12 1450 0850 0850
OM 1975 VOL* SEDA
0 4 11 0940 0900 0850
| ^ 88 SB | 2li T
i m sag s I *»2
2 1 12 1520 1000 Og80
3 21 0710 0600 0600
1 16 0720 0550 0640
:60 2 1 25 07§0 0700 0700
1 § 231 2 1
, 1975 ifilC SffiA 8 350 I 1
I 1975 BUIC STAW 8 350 4 1
19 062
21 05
m § 1$. 0* 1
Z™* **B¥A U 500 4 1
CADI FLEE 8 500 4 1
. '0 0650 0900
21 0580 0650 0960
22 0600 0600 0760
22 0590 0600 0760
26 0650 0600 0720
26 0630 0600 ~
28 0660 0600 --
28 0650 0600 —
-03 -05 -05
49 +13 -03 -03
"9 +19 +05 +05
.9 +10 +03 +03
99 +05 +05 +05
IS '"5
8 m
252 197!
lilli
CBEV NOVA
CHEV CAHA
CHBV NOVA
CHEV MALI
CHEV MALI
CBEV STAW
CHBV MONT
8 262 2 1
8 350 2 1
8 350 2 1
8 350 2 1
350
350
10 11
0795
06
H 85
if?
21 0580
iJ 22°° °900 08*0
21 0630 0600 0820
22 0670 0600 0830
22 0540 0600 0760
22 0630 0600 —
22 0720 0600 —
22 0625 0600 —
,-- 00 —
00 0600 0750
5 0600 —
0 0600 0880
150 — 2.7 99.9 -- 4000 12.0 2 1
"05 — 6.9 99.9 — 4000 12.0 2
30 — 0.2 99.9 — 4000 12.0 2
30 — 0.0 99.9 -- 4000 13.2 1
4000 12.0 2
4000 12.0 2
4000 12.0 2
4000 12.0 2
+15 +12 +12
+12 +12 +12
99 +11 +06 +06
99 +17 +08 +08
1 21 0660 0550 0780 99 99 99 +08 +10 +10
1 22 0560 0600 0840 99 99 99 +12 +06 +06
1 26 0570 0600 0820 99 99 99 +08 +06 +06
1 26 0640 0600 0820 99 99 99 +09 +06 +06
1 22 0580 0600 0750 99 99 99 +07 +06 +06
'00 0750 0750 99 99 99 +17 +10 +10
I40 0750 0750 99 99 §9 +08 +02 +02
0710 0750 0750 99 99 §9 +08 000 000
+12 +12 +12
+06 +06 +06
„ +06 +06 +06
99 +08 +08 +08
19 +21 +20 +20
19 +20 +20 +20
" +03 +02 +02
000 000 000
99 +16 +16 +16 250
" +16 +16 +16 45
+15 +16 +15 60
-05 +06 +06 300
39 99 99 +10 +0(
39 99 _ +11 +o(
»9 99 — +26 +0
J9 99 _ +14 +oe
+06
180 100
240 40
00 210
40 60
1 11 0650 0650 0850 51 51 51 +10 +10 +10 220
4 11 1150 0850 0840 40 49 53 +14 +09 +07 90
1 !H 9§§0 0850 0850 60 5§ 5j +13 +0? +g| 35
99 99 99 +13 +12 +12 140
99 99 99 +18 +18 +18 150
99 99 99 +12 +12 +12 210
99 99 99 +09 +12 +12 100
99 99 +08 +12 +12 75
-- ._ +12 +10 - 80
-. -- — +07 +06 - 30
99 99 — +06 +06 - 130
99 99 +11 +10 +10 310
99 99 +10 +12 +12
99 99 +10 +08 +08 40
99 99 +13 +06 +06 2
99 99 +09 +06 +06 2
99 99 +11 +06 +06 1
•* i j wuni Twpp
°° 0650
00 0770
22 0600 0600 —
IS 2^2° 0600 0800
II 225° °750 0750
26 0795 0750 0750
99 — +08 +08 -
99 99 +10 +06 +06
99 __ +04 +06 -
99 99 +09 +06 +06
99 99 +09 +06 +06 270
99 99 +10 +06 +06 215
. 99 99 +08 +08 +08 25
9 99 99 +07 +08 +08 45
9 99 — +23+16 - 35
9 99 99<+16+16 +16 25
9 99 99 +06 +06 +06 140
9 99 99 +15 +08 +08 2000
0.0 5500 15.3 1 1
r 14.7 1 1
4000 1 '
0.3 5000
0.1 4000 13.
0.0 3500 11.2 2
0.0
0.
1 1
1
3000 10.3 2 1
... 4500 14.6 1 1
0.0 3500 11.2 2
0.1 4~
4500 14.0 1
0.4 4500 14.0 1
0.1 5000 14.7 1
0.3 4500 14.0 1
0.0 5000 14.7 1
0.0 4000 13.2
14.
100 1.0 99.9
30 0.0 99-9
220 0.8 2.0
80 2.2 1.5
120 1.1 99.9
150 5-0 99-9
0.1
4.2
0.1
0.0 99.9
2,5
6.0 4500 14".0 1
0.0 4000 13.2 1
0.1 3500 11.2 2
0.0 4500 14.0 1
0.0 4000 12.0 2
0.0 5000 14.7 1
0.0 2750 9.9 2
0.8 2250
2.1 2000 .
0.4 2750 1C
3.2 2250 '
0.0 2500 10.3 1
1.1 3000 10.3 2
0.0 3500 12.3 1
0.0 4000 13.2 1
60 8.4 99.9
150 5.7 99.9
IS i:
200 6.0 99.9
180 3.5 99.9
0 0.1 99.9
40 0.1 99.9
0.0 99.9
20 0.0 99-9
50 2.7 0.3
30 5-0 0.3
0.1 2750 9.9 2
]000 10.3 2
H:hl
0.0 3500 11.2 2 1
0.0 4000 13.2 1 1
0.3 3500 12.3 1 1
0.0 4000 12.0 2 1
0.0 4000 12.0 2 1
II II II I 1
__ __ - 1
__ - 1
0.3 4500 14.0 1 1
571 4500 14"7o 1
0.1 4500 12.7 2
0.0 4500 14.0 1
0.0 4500 12.7 2
0.0 5000 14.7 1
1 2 1
t 2 1
0.0 4500 14.0 1 121
0.0 4500 14.0 11122
0.0 5000 14.7 11122
~ 4000 13.2 1 1 1
— 4000 12.0 2 1 1
0.1 3500 11.2 2 1 1
0.0 4000 13.2 1 1 1
0.2 5000 14.7 1 1 1
0.1 4000 13.2 1 1 1
0.4 5500 15.3 1 1 1
0.0 2750 9.9 2 1 1
0.0 3500 11.2 2 1 1
0.0 4000 13.2 1 1 1
0.0 4500 12.7 2 1 1
0.0 4500 14.0 1 1 1
1 2 2
1 2 1
1 2 1
1 2 1
2 1
2 t
2 2
2 2
2 2
2 2
2 2
2 2
2 2
2 2
2 2
2 2
2 1
2 2
2 2
2 2
2 1
2 2
2
2
1 1
1 2
1 2
1 2 2
1 2 2
1 2 2
1 2 2
1 2 2
1 2 2
1 2 2
1 2 2
1 2 1
1 2 2
1 2 1
1 2 1
1 2 2
1 2 1
1 2 2
1 2 1
1 2 1
2 2
2 2
1 2 2
1 2 2
1 2 2
1 2 1
1
2 2
2 2
2 2
2 2
! \ I
2 1
2 2
2 2
2 2
1 2 2
1 2 2
1 2 1
1 2 1
1 2 2
1 2 2
1 2 2
1 2 2
2 2
2 2
2 1
A-3
-------
APPENDIX A.CONT'D
LISTING OF VEHICLES AND TEST PARAMETERS
DENVER
VEH YEAR MAKE MODL C CID V T FT RPMR RPMS RPMA DR DS_DA_IGR_IGS_IGA__IHC_IHCA__ICO_ICOS_ICOA INRT RLHP L P CS CC 4p
270 1975 DODG DART 8 3)8
272 1975 DODG CHAR 8 360
273
275
2
1975 DODG MONA 8 466 2
1975 FORD MUST 4 140 2
276 1975 FORD PINT 4 110 2
277 1975 FORD MUST 6 171 2
281 1975 FORD GRAN 8 302 2
282 1975 FORD STAW 8 351 2
FORD TORI 8 351
" flOO
285 1975 FORD TORI
285 1975 FORD LTD
286 1975 FORD ELIT
2
.- 2
151 2
2
287 1975 FORD LTD 8 351 2
288 1975 FORD TORI 8 351 2
289 1975 FORD LTD 8 400 2
290 1975 FORD LTD 8 400 2
291
292
1975 FORD LTD
8 400 2
FORD LTD 8 400 2
1975 FORD LTD 8 460 4
1975 LINC CONT 8 460 4
295 1975 MERC MONA 8 302 2
297 1975 MERC MONT 8 351 2
298 1975 MERC COUG 8 351 2
300 1975 OLDS OMEG 8 260 2
301
302
1975 OLDS CUTL 8
1975 OLDS CUTL 8
303 1975 OLDS STAW
304 1975 OLDS CUTL
50 4
50 4
50 4
55 4
305 1975 OLDS STAW 8 455 4
306 1§75 OLDS DELT 8 455 4
307 1975 PLYM DUST 6 225 1
308 1975 PLYM SCAM 8 318 2
309 1975 PLYM VALI 8 318 2
310 1975 PLYM FURY 8 318 2
311 1975 PLYM FURY 8 360 2
312 1975 PLYM FURY 8 400 2
16 0590 0750 0750 99
26 0770 0750 0750 99
27 0840 0750 0750 99
13 0860 0750 0900 99
13 0980 0850 -- 99
13 0820 0850 0850 99
1§ 0500 0650 0830 99
21 0660 0650 0900 99
27 0500 0650 — 99
27 0720 0700 0960 "
24 0780 0650 0760
27 0860 0650 0880
24 0700 0650 0920
50 0940
_, 0540 Ol
24 0520 0700 0920
24 0560 0700 0700 99
21 0630 0700 ~ 99
24 0585 0700 ~ 99
24 0620 0650 0830 99
24 0850 0650 0800 "
25 0550 0650 0900
27 0690 0650 0950
10 0650 0860
22 0490 0650
56
99 +08 +02 +02
99 99 +10 +06 +06
99 99 +07 +08 +08
99 99 +14 +06 +06
99 02 +06 -
99 99 +15 +08 +08
99 99 +20 +06 +06
99 99 +10 +08 +08
— +11 +06 -
+11 +06 +06
+14 +08 +08
99 99 +06 +14 +06
99+13 +08 +08
99 +08 +08 +08
99 99 +06 +08 +08
99 99 000 +06 +06
-- +15 +08
— +18 +08 -
99 +14 +14 +14
99 +14 +14 +14
99 99 +03 +08 +08
99 99 +03 +08 +08
- §9+17 +06 +06
99 +18 +18 +18
27 0590 0650 .„
21 0650 0650 08
22 0490 0650 — 99 99 ~ +13 +20 -
22 0560 0650 — 99 99 — +15 +20 -
22 0515 0550 0800 99 99 99 +23 +20 +20
22 0530 0650 -- 99 99 -- +18 +16 -
316 1975 PONT LENA
317 1975 PONT VENT 8
318 1975 PONT LEMA 8
319 1975 PONT CATA 8
320 1975 PONT STAW 8
321 1975 PONT GHNV 8
FOX 4
140
350
350
22 0545 0650 — 99 99 — +1§ +1§ 50
22 0580 0650 — 99 99 — +18 +16 - 30
16 0760 0750 0750 99 99 99 +07 000 000 170
16 0640 0750 0750 99 99 99 +05 +02 +02 30
99 +02 +02 +02 240
99 +02 +02 +02 75
+09 +06 +06 180
+15 +10 +10 300
, +06 +06 230
99 99 +16 +12 +12 220
99 99 99 +16 +16 +16 200
99 99 — +12 +12 - 50
+16
16 0930 0750 0750 99
26 0610 0750 0750
26 0720 0750 0750
27 0750 0750 0750
313 1975 PLYM FURY 8 360 2 1 20 0620 0750 0750 99 99 99 +1
314 1975 PONT ASTR 4 " " " "
2 1 16 0800
1 21 0770 0
1 21 0605 0600 ~
0 0940
0 0780
350 2 1 21 0730 0650 0900 99 99 99 +16 +16 +16 50
400 2 1 26 0640 0650 — 99 99 — +20 +16 - 40
400 4 1 22 0640 0625 0870 99 99 99 +16 +16 +16 40
455 4 1 26 0580 0650 0840 99 99 99 +16 +16 +16 20
CAPR GHIA 6 171 2
4 98
COLT SEDA .
DATS 710 4
97 0 4 12 0920 0920 Og25 47 47 47 -0^ -Og -Og
1 13 1000 0700 0875
5 14 0820 0900 0900 ^ Jf. Jf. .-„. -™
119 2 4 13 0740 0750 0750 50 53 53 +14 +1
+05
+01 +03
90
200
+03 70
+12 95
327 1975 DATS B210 4
328 1975 DATS SEDA 4 11
329 1975 FIAT STAW 4
330 1975 FIAT X1-9 4
331 1975 BOND CVCC 4
332 1975 MAZD RX3 2
333 1975 MAZD RX3 2
335 1975 MG MGB 4
1975 OPEL STAW 4
TORS 911S 6
i!
85 2 4 12 0900 0700 0700
13 0640 0650 0810
2 1
78 2 4
79 2 4 1
1080 0850 OSJO __
0920 0850 0880 59
91 3 4 11 OJOO 0850 —
70 4 4 14 0850 0850 0850
70 4 4 16 0790 0825 0825 . .
110 2 4 12 0925 0925 0925 53
116 0 1
164 0 5
tim
53 53 +08 +10 +10 120
99 99 +16 +12 +12 85
55 56 +40 000 000 2000
57 57 000 000 000 25
5? — +03 000 - 260
- -,6 -15 -15 -15 0
,4 -14 -15 -15 10
53 53 +13 +13 +1:
20
14 0840 0980 0980 47
a s i
1975 TOYO CORO 4
47 47 000 000 000 85
99 99 +05 -05 -05 50
99 99 +06 +08 +08 1«J8
1975 VOLK SEDA 4
1975 VOLK RABB 4
1975 VOLK RABB 4
1975 VOLV SEDA
1975 FORD GRAN
1975 MERC MONA
1975 OLDS OMEG
0900 0850 0850 62 52 52+15+10+10 5
0675 0850 0850 46 46 46 -03 -05 -05 180
I960 0980 0980 99 99 99 -04 -03 -03 110
97 2 5
97 0 4
90 2 4 12 0966 09&0 09-
90 2 4 12 1130 0925 --
4 121 0 1 15 1040 0900 0900
6 200 1 3 19 1010 0800 0800
I il2 1 3 25 °§i° °600 0700
6 250 1 1 21 0680 0550 0750
522
523
525
525
1975 PLYM GRNF
1975 PONT VENT
1975 BMW SEDA
1975 BMW 5301
1975 SUBA STAW
1975 HERB 450S
1975 PORS 914
1975 SAAB 99LE
. . AMMO HORN
975 AMMO HORN
975 DODG MONA
0750 99
6 250 1 1 21 0590 OJSO 0720 99
4 121 2 4 14 0740 OB50 — 6?
6 182 0 4 19 0870 0900 — 38
4 83 1 4 12 0840 0800 0800 52
'6 0 1 25 0800 0800 0800 31
03 -03 -
38
+13 +05 +05 40
+06 +06 +06 20
+10 +06 +06 30
000 +10 +10 90
+14 +10 +10 400
.. +12 +10 +10 25
— +27 +25 - 0
+20 +22 - 1340
82
4 120 0 5 TS 6966 6'
0 4 15 0740 0
\l
1975
19
1975 MERC MARQ 8 460 4
|00 —
100 —
50 50 -05 +08 +08
1 31 000 000 000
0 — +18 +27 -
— +20 +14 -
16 0540 0550 0650 9
16 0620 0550 0660
0640 0750 0750
0700 0650 oWo 99
+06
._ .. +17 +08 +08
99 99 +15 +14 +14
+20 +05
+03 +0]
310
70
1600
230
110
300
25
0.8 99.S
9.6 99..
10.0 99.9
1.0 99-9
240
15
2f5 ::
960 100
10 —
165 10.0
70 5.4
35 4.2
110 5.0
40 4.2 0.3
20 8.8 99.9
4.8 §9.9
0.1 99.5
90
100
15 —
130
8
0.9 3500 11.2 2 1
1.5 4000 12.0 2
0.3 4500 14.0 1
0.8 3000 1o!3 2 1
0.1 3000 10.3 2 1
o.o 3500 11.2 2
0.2 5000 14.7 1 1
0.2 4500 14.0 . i
0.5 4500 12.7 2
0.1 4500 14.0 1 i
0.5 4500 14.0 1 i
0.5 4500 14.0 1
0.2 4500 12.7 2 1
0.7 4500 14.0 1 1
0.1 4500 11). 0 1 1
0.3 5500 15.3 1 1
0.0 3500 11.2 2 1
0.4 4500 14.0 1 1
0.1 4500 14.0 1 1
0.0 4000 12.0 2 1
0.0 4500 14.0 1 1
_. . 1
0.0 3500 12.3 1
0.3 3500 11.2 2
0.3 3500 11.2 2
0.1 4000 12.0 2
0.3 4000 12.0 2
0.0 4500 14.0 1
0.0 4500 14.0 1
0.0 2750 9.9 2
0.0 4000 13-2 1
0.0
90 o!o 99.9
30 0.1 99.9
— 2000
0.0 2750
0.0 2750
1.0 2500
20 0.1 99.9
210 2.2 2.0
60 2.5 2.
0.0 0.
ii
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
I
2
2
2
2
2 2
2 2
2 2
2 2
2 2
2 2
2 2
2 2
2 2
2 2
2 2
2 2
2 2
2 2
2 2
2 2
2 2
2 2
2 2
2 2
2 2
2 2
\\
2 \
2
2
2
2
2
i!
I!
H
i!
!!
A-4
-------
APPENDIX A.CONT'D
LISTING OF VEHICLES AND TEST PARAMETERS
DENVER
MODL C CID V T FT RPMR RPMS RPMA DR DS DA IGR IGS IGA JCHC IHCA ICO ICOS ICOA INRT RLHP L P CS CC AP
197!
«
541 1975
5!? !!£
f AMMO GREM
; AMMO PACE
i AIM) HORN
AMMO HORN 6
AMMO HORN
AMMO PACE
AHHOMATA
BUIC SKIL
BDIC REGA
K«i 1Q75 BUIC LBSA -
545 1975 BUIC LESA 8
eic 1975 BUIC REGA
547 1975 BUIC REGA
54& 975 BUIC LESA ~
549 1975 BUIC LBSA 8
550 1975 BOIC LESA 8
551 975 BDIC LESA 8
552 1975 BOIC RIVI 8
553 1975 BOIC RIVI 8
554 1975 BOIC STAW 8 455 4
555 1975 CADI ELDO 8 500 4
556 1975 CADI DBVI 8 500 4
557 1975 CADI ELDO 8 500 4
3 21 0705 0600
1 21 0670 0650
1 25 0600 0650
1 16 0560 0550
?16 0700 0600
16 0650 0650
1 21 0675 0550
1 25 0815 0700
1 21 0580 0650
1 22 0570 0600
1 26 0650 0600
1 26 0530 0600
600
0600 99 99 99 +10 +05 +05
0650 99 99 99 +07 +07 +07
590 99
— QQ
yy
05'
99 +15 +03
+04 +03
+03
270
140
22 0580
22 0660 0600
1
1 26 0550 0600
1 26 0600 0600
0600 99 99 99 +12 +05 +05
0700 99 99 99 +15 +03 +03
__ 99 99 — +16 +18
__ 99 99 _ +12 +17 -
0750 99 99 99 +15 +12 +12
_ 99 99 — +13 +12 -
__ gg 99 __ +18 +12 -
0800 99 99 99 +11 +12 +12
__ 99 99 — +12 +12 -
0740 99 99 99 +12 +12 +12
90
. 110
180 200
90 ~
30 70
70 ~
40 100
45
30
8.0 1.0
2.7 1.0
6.4 1.0
0.1 1.0 ~
0.1
0.3
1.0
IOOO 10.3 2 1 1 2
JOOO 10.3 2112
3500 12.3 1112
1.5 99.9 0.5 3000 10.3 2 1
2.0 '1.6 --" '— —" - 1 1 2
3.0 1.0 1.0 3500 11.2 2112
0.0 99.9 — — — - 1 1 2
----- 112
57l 4500 llTo 1112
__ — ... 1 i 2
9-1 92-3 — — — - 1 i 2
6.7 99.9 0.0 4000 13.2 1112
0.4 99.9 — -- — - 1 1 2
2.5 99.9 0.0 4500 14.0 1112
1 26 0645 0600 0750 99 99 99 +12 +12 +12
1 26 0580 0600 0730 99 99 99 +14 +12 +12
1 26 0560 0600 — 99 99 — +11 +12 -
1 26 0665 0600 0735 99 99 99 +12 +12 +12
1 22 0780 0600 0700 99 99 99 +12 +12
1 28 0600 0600 ~ 99 99 — +08 +06
1 28 0575 0600 — 99 99 — +12 +06
1 28 0640 0600 — 99 99 — +12 +06
+12
220
150 II
60 —
558 1975 CADI CALA 8 500 4 1 28 0670 0600 — 99 99 — +05 +06 -
559 975 CADI ELDO 8 500 4 1 28 0610 0600 0780 99 99 99 +11 +06 +06
560 1975 CADI DEVI 8 500 4 1 28 0620 0600 0845 99 99 99 +06 +06 +06
561 1975 CADI CALA 8 500 4 1 28 0580 0600 ~ 99 99 — +08 +06 -
562 1976 CADI SEVI 8
563 1975 CHEV HONZ
564 1975 CHEV VEGA
565 1975 CHEV VEGA
50 0 1 21 0785 0600 — 99 99 — +14 +10
15 --
4 150 2 4 19 1300 0700 -- 99 99 — +11 +10 130 — 1.8 99.9 — —
4 140 2 3 16 0850 0700 — 99 99 — +12 +10 - 60 — 0.0 99.9 — —
4 140 2 4 16 0865 0700 0700 99 99 99 +13 +10 +10 980 160 10.0 99.9 0.3 2750
~ - 1 12
— - 1 12
— - 1 12
9.9 2 1 1 2
566 1975 CHEV HONZ 4
567 1975 CHEV VEGA 4
568 1975 CHEV VEGA 4
569 1975 CHEV VEGA 4
570 1975 CHEV HONZ 4
571 1975 CHEV VEGA
572 1975 CHEV HONZ
573 1975 CHEV NOVA
574 1975 CHEV CAMA
57§ 1975 CHEV NOVA
140 2 4 ig 0800 0700 — 99 99 — +15 +10 -
140 2 1 16 0690 0750 0960 99 99 99 +12 +12 +12
140 2 1 16 0700 0600 0600 99 99 99 +12 +12 +12
140 2 1 16 0690 0750 0880 99 99 99 +11 +12 +12
40 — (
520 200 f
350 225 1
345 30 t
.0 99.9 — — — - 1
.4 99.9 0.2 2750 10.9 1 1
.0 99.9 0.5 2750 10.9 1 1
.4 99.9 0.0 2750 9.9 2 1
140
140
1 19 0750 0750 0940 99 99 99 +15 +12 +12
16 0900 07.00 0700 99 99 99+1' " "
|76 1975 CHEV NOVA 8 2 2
>77 1975 CHEV NOVA 8 262 2
J27,5 CHBV NOVA
975 CHEV NOVA
1975 CHEV CAMA
585 1975 CHEV NOVA
ISO 4 4 21 0770 0800 ~
1 1 21 065 "
21
21
55 0600 —
0600 —
0600 —
.. +10 +10
~ +06 +08 -
+09 +10
99 99 — +06 +06
99 99 — +07 +08 -
99 99 __ +07 +08 -
99 99 — +08 +08
39°
840
25 6.5 99.9 0.0 3000 10.3 2 1
250 10.0 99.9 0.0 2750 9.9 2 1
0.0 99.9 — — — - 1
0.0 99.9 ~ — ~ - 1
0.0 99.9 --
3-0 99.9
0.1 99.9
0.9 99.9
262 2 1 19 0640 0600 ~ 99 99 — +20 +08 -
n62 2 1 19 0540 0600 — 99 99 ~ +17 +08 -
1 21 0620 0600 0825 99 99 99 +12 +06 +06
1 21 0575 0600 0900 99 99 99 +12 +06 +06
0.0
0.0
MALI
111 'ill! CHBV M°NT
597 1975 CHBV STAW 8
1F
_ 1 21 0670 0600 0820
2 1 21 0600 0600 0750
50 4 1 21 0580 0600 —
21 0580 0600 —
21 0545 0600 —
22 0575 0600 —
22 0680 0600 0810 9
22 0560 0600 0780 9
22 0580 0600 —
22 0520 0600 0780
n m m
,uj 197!
601 I97f
in*
605 I??!
llii
400
4C
1!
+08 +06 +06 170
. +08 +06 +06 310
,_ +1J, +08 - 35
- +13 +08 - 20
- 3
22 0600 0600
22 0650 0600
22 0640 0600 0780
22 0630 0600 — 99
21 0600 0600 0820 99
22 0530 0600 0815 9'
22 0590 0600 0850
22 0590 0600 -- 9
21 0925 0800 — 9
22 0670 0600 9
22 0580 0600 — 9
22 0630 0600 — 9
22 0535 0600 — 9'
26 0580 0600 — 9
22 0570 0600 0780 9
27 0640 0750 0750 9
~ +06 +0
— +14 +0.
99 +10 +06 +06
99+13 +06 +06
— +09 +06 - 110
99 +15 +06 +0"
\ +a +8
+12 +06 +06
+08 +06 +06
__ .. +02 +06 +06
99 — +19 +16 -
9 +12 +06 +06
+08 +06 +06
.. +11 +06 +06
— +13 +06 -
99 — +09 +08 180
99 -- +11 +08 0
99 — +05 +08 - 100
99 _ +12 +06 - 40
99 — +13 +0
" — +14
99
99 99 +19 +K
99 99 +05 "
+Q8 -
+09 +06
+16
+06
99 +10 +06 +10 340
99 +15 +10 +10 1420
— +06 +06 - 170
99 +13 +10 +10 370
__ — — 1
— - 1
0.4 3500 11.2 2 1
0.0 4000 12.0 2 1
0.0 4000 12.0 2 1
0.2 4000 13-2 1 1
II II II " 1
40 —
4?8 "
100
70
150
0.9 4000 12.0 2 1
0.1 4000 13-2 1 1
__ __ — - 1
0.1 4000 13.2 1 1
81 4000 13.2 1 1
:\ 4050 13:2 \ \
0.0 4000 13.2 1 1
0.3 4000 13.2 1 1
0.1 4500 14.0 1 1
0.1 4000 13.2 1 1
0.1 4000 13.2 1 1
0.2 4000 13.2 1 1
__ _- - 1
II II II " 1
__ — — 1
— - 1
115.3 1 1
0 14.0 1 1
0.1
0.3
450
0.3 4500 14.0 1 1
0.3 4500 14.0 1 1
0~3 5000 14?7 T 1
1 2
1 2
9 0.0 4500 14.0 11122
._ 99.9 0.1 4500 14.0 11122
.8 99.9 — — — - 1 1 2 2
.9 99.9 0.1 5000 14.7 11122
6.8 99.9 0.1 5500 15.3 11122
0.1 99.9 — — — - 1 1 2 2
0.3 99.9 — — — - 1 1 2 2
0.2 99.9 — — — 1122
60 — 0.0 99.9 -- — — - 1 1 2 2
580 130 6.4 99.9 0.1 5500 15.3 11122
425 200 5.0 99.9 0.5 5500 15.3 11122
210 ~ 0.8 99.9 — — — - 1 1 2 2
1 2 2
1 2 2
1 2 2
1 2 2
1 2 2
1 2 2
1 2 1
1 2 2
1 2 1
1 2 2
1 2 2
1 2 2
1 2 1
1 2 1
1 2 2
1 2 2
1 2 2
1 2 2
2 2
2 2
1 2 2
1 2 2
1 2 2
1 2 2
1 2 2
1 2 2
1 2 2
1 2 1
2 2
2 2
2 2
2 2
2 2
2 2
2 1
2 1
2 1
2 1
2 1
2 2
2 2
2 2
2 2
2 2
A-5
-------
APPENDIX A.CONT'D
LISTING OP VEHICLES AND TEST PARAMETERS
DENVER
VEH YEAR MAKE MODL C CID V T FT RPMR
621
622
1975 CHRY NEWY
1975 CHRY NEWY
1975 DODG DART
1976 DODG DART
1975 DODG DART
1975 DODG DART
1975 DODG CHAR
1975 DODG CHAR
1975 DODG CHAR
1975 DODG MONA
1975 FORD PINT
1975 FORD PINT
27 0840 0750
4 1 27 0775 0750
1 1 16 Qir
8 440
8 440 ......
6 225 1 1 16 0895 0750
6 225 1 3 16 0730 0750
8 318 2 16 0725 0750
8 318 2 16 0790 0750
8 318 2 26 0740 0750
8 360 2 26 0780 0750
8 400 4 26 0800 0750
8 400 2 27 0700 0750
4 140 2 4 14 0820 0850
4 140 2 4 14 1000 0850
1975 FORD PINT 4 140 2 4
1975 FORD MUST 4 140 2 4
1975 FORD MUST 4 140 2 4
1975 FORD PINT 4 140 2 4
13 0800 0850
13 0750 0850
13 0850 0850
14 0920 0850
— 99 99 —
0750 99 99 99
0750 99 99 99
0750 99 99 99
-- 99 99 —
0750 99 9r "
0750 99 9(
II 99 99 —
+15 +08 -
+15 +08 +08
+07 000 000
+04 +06 -
+04 +02 +02
+02 +02 -
+09 -02 -02
+15 +06 +06
+20 +08 +08
+08 +10 +10
+10 +06 +06
+14 +0f
25
200
220
140
200
30
300
200
210
12
150
—
30
~
130
90
530 1975 FORD PINT 4
631 1975 FORD PINT 4
532 1975 FORD PINT 4
633 1975 FORD PINT 4 140 2
140 2 1 14 1075 0750
140 2 1 14 0750 0750
140 2 4 13 1300 0850
1 14 Of
40 0750 —
634 1975 FORD PINT 4
635 1975 FORD PINT 6
636 1975 FORD STAW 6
637 1975 FORD PINT 6
;8 1975 FORD STAW 6 171 2
1975 FORD MUST 6 171 2
1975 FORD GRAN 6 200 1
1976 FORD MUST 8 302 2
'42 1975 FORD MAVE 6 250 1 1 1
'43 1975 FORD GRAN 6 250 1 1 1
2 4 13 0985 0750
1 14 Q85P 0700
140
171 2 1 14 1950 0700
171 2 1 14 0725 0700
§9 __
05 +06
+07 +06
+09 +06
+05 +06
+12 +06
+05 +06
+25 +12
+10 +06
+17 +06
+20 +08
+18 +08
+10 +08
- 100 --
20
50
110
30
45
II
52
50
70
40
70
0850 07
0830 07
« 99
— 99
0875 6800 — 99
" — 99
0710 0600 —
__ +11 +08
__ +10 +08
__ +16 +06
__ +19 +12
645 1975 FORD HAVE 6
645 1975 FORD GRAN 8
646 1975 FORD GRAN 6
647 1975 FORD GRAN 8
648 1975 FORD ELIT 8
649 1975 FORD GRAN 8
°W °io° ~
1 4 15 07?5 6800 —
2 1 19 0650 0650 ~
99 99 — +16 +06 -
99 99 — +04 +06 -
99 99 — +08 +06
99 99 __ +03 +06
45
72°5
60
70
351 2 1 19 0610 0650 — 99 99 — +10 +04 170
302 2 1 19 0810 0650 — 99 99 — +05 +06 - 50
351 2 1 24 0650 0650 ~ 99 99 — 000 +06 - 80
302 2 1 19 0670 0650 0850 99 99 99 +08 +06 +06 275
650 1975 FORD GRAN 8 302 2 1 19 0560 0650 — 99 99 — +08 +08
651 1975 FORD GRAN 8 302 2 1 19 0580 0650 — 99 99 — +12 +06
652 1975 FORD TORI 8 351 2 1 21 0680 0650 — 99 99 ~ +09 +08 -
653 1975 FORD STAW 8 351 2 1 21 0540 0650 0860 99 99 99 +11 +08 +08
60
60
100
60
80
80
654 1975 FORD ELIT 8 400 2 1 26 0425
655 1975 FORD LTD 8 460 4 1 24 0680 0650 0870
656 1975 FORD GRAN 8 351 2 1 19 0570 0650 0840
657 1976 FORD RANG 8 351 2 1 20 0590 0650 ~
0700 0980
0*5
99 99 +18 +08 +08 1150
99 99 +12 +14 +14 40
99 99 +11 +04 +04 85
99 — +08 +04 - 210
1975 FORD TORI 8
1975 FORD GRAN 8
1975 FORD TORI 8
1975 FORD LTD 8
99 — +08 +06
151 2 1 27 0630 0650 —
)51 2 1 19 0645 0650 —
151 2 1 27 0750 0650 —
100 2 1 21 0565 0700 ~ 99 99 — +19 +0i
99 — +37 +04 -
99 — +1P +06 -
100
150
490
125
665
666
FORD LTD
FORD THND
FORD THND
LINC CONT
0700
0560
65 0700 —
0640 06'
99 99 — +1!
50 — 99 99 — +1i
0650 0800 99 99 99 +1<
0650 0940 99 99 99 +1!
10 0650 —
1975 LINC MRK4 8 460 4 1
1975 MERC MONA 6 200 1 3 25 0660 0800 0800
1976 MERC MONA 6 250 1 1 25 0600 0600 —
1975 MERC MONA 8 302 2 1 25 0665 0650 ~
— +2;
99 +Qi
-- +20 +12
— +16 +06
+08 80
+14 - 100
+14 +14 220
+14 +14 40
+14 - 60
+06 +06 35
MERC COUG 8 351
MERC HONG 8 351
MERC HONG 8 351
MERC MONA 8 351
2 1 27 0615 0650 — 99 99 -- +08 +08 -
2 1 27 0690 0650 — 99 99 — +19 +06 -
2 j 27 0525 0650 0880 99 99 99 +JQ +Q§ +08
2 1 25 0630 0625 ~ 99 99 -- +08 +08 -
674
1975 OLDS OMEG 8 260 2
1975 OLDS OMEG 8 260 2
1 21 0520 0650
«- - 1 21 0640 0650
OLDS CUTL 8 260 2 1 22 0480 0650
1975 OLDS CUTL 8 260 2 1 22 0510 0650
1040 99 99 99 +32 +18 +18
~ 99 99 — +20 +18 -
1975 OLDS CUTL 8 260
1975 OLDS CUTL 8 260
1975 OLDS CUTL 8 260
1975 OLDS CUTL 8 350
1975 OLDS CUTL 8 350
1975 OLDS DELT 8 350
1975 OLDS DELT 8 350
1975 OLDS CUTL 8 350
1976 OLDS STAW 8 350
1975 OLDS CUTL 8 455
1975 OLDS DELT 8 455
1975 PLYM DUST 6 225
0525 Oi
0450 0650
50 —
22
22
22 0460 0650
22 0530 0650
22 0520 0650
26 0600 0650
26 05.20 0650 —
4 1 22 6566 0650 —
4 1 22 0525 0550
4 1 22 0550 0650
4 1 26 0530 0650
1 3 16 0850 0800
— +12 +18
— +22 +18
— +14 +18
— +23 +20
+21 +20
— +20 +20
— +19 +20
99 99 __ +24 +20
1975 PLYH VALI 6
1975 PLYM DUST
1975 PLYM DUST
1975 PLYM FURY 8
-f 225
6 225
8 318
8 318
1 1 1
1 1 1
2
0810 0750
. .- 0560 0750
3 16 0865 0750
1 26 0820 0750
0800
0750
0750
— +23 +22
— +24 +16
— +18 +16 -
99 000 000 000
40
99 99 +05 000 000
99 99 000 000 000
99 __ +Q6 +02 -
99 — +02 000
P CS CC
6.0
0.1
6.9
5.0 0.
20 1.6
55 10.0 0.'
70 0.4 99.1
0.5 99.9
1.0 99.9
0.1 99-9
0 0.1 99.9
:0 1.9 99.9
4.4 99.9
1.4 99.9
125
-- 0.2
-- 2.7 .. .
30 9.5 99.9
30 0.0 99.9
0.4 99.9
80 0.3 "
II o!o 99.9
60
95 1.8 0.-
40 9.5 O.J
— 0.3 0.-
— 0.0 0.!
5000 14.7 1 1
3500 12:3 1 1
— — . i
0.0 3500 11.2 2
o!o 99-9
0.0 99-9
6.0 0.3
1 4000 12^0 2
3 4000 13.2 1
13.2 1
. 14.0
0.4 3000 10 3 2
4000
4500
0.3 3500 12.3 1
5T3 4500 14.0 1 1
0.1 4500 14.0 1 1
0.1 4500 14.0 1 1
0.3 3500 12.3 1 j
-- - 1
" II . i
~~ ~
— - 1
_ __ — - 1
0.3 5000 14.7 J 1
0.1 5500 15.3 1 1
1
0.0 3500 11.2 2 1
__ — - 1
-- - 1
6?1 4500 14:0 1 I
1
0?1 4000 12.0 2 "
573 3500 11-2 2
0.8
0.1
1881H
tP
"•"•»•
i!
i!
M
2 \
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2 2
2 \
2 \
2 1
2 1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
ii
. 1
i!
1!
!!
III
\\
A-6
-------
APPENDIX A.CONT'D
LISTING OF VEHICLES AND TEST PARAMETERS
VBH YEAR MAKE_MOpL_C_CID
——rr_T"«r«u PIIPV B 360
DENVER
FT RPMR RPMS RPMA DR DS DA IGR IGS IGA IHC IHCA ICO ICOS ICOA INRT RLHP L P CS CC AP
SK I
PONT CATA 8
PONT FIRE 8
PONT STAW 8
PONT GRNV 8
27 0620 0750 0750 99
1 20 0800 0700 — 99
22 0620 0550 0730 99
21 0565 0650 ~ 99
22 0600 0600 0860
21 0690 0600 0750
26 0585 0650 0800
22 0670 0650 0815 9
1 22 0740 0650 —
1 26 0815 Q65Q —
1 15 0970 0925
12 0700 0700
0700
99 99 +12 +06 +06
99 — +10 +10 -
99 99 +12 +10 +10
99 __ +19 +18 -
99 99 +16 +16 +16
+19 +16 +1'
+15 +16 +1
+23 +16 +1
— +18 +16 -
— +12 +16 -
08 -06 -
50 +05 +10 +10
1010 30 9-7 0.3 0.1 4500 14.0 11122
200 -- 1.8 0.3 ~ — — - 1 1 2 2
325 140 7.1 99.9 0.1 3500 11.2 21122
20 — 0.1 99.9 ...... - 1 1 2 2
0.1 4000 13.2 11122
0.0 4000 12.0 21122
1.6 4500 14.0 11122
0.5 4000 13.2 11122
__ — — _ 1 1 2 2
122
1 2 2
1 2 1
y : '
709 1975
B.TS M.DG1 \
Sit S?A°S 8
Hi UTS Tofo CORO 4
712 1975 TOYO CORO 1
713 1975 TOYO CORO 4
711 1975 VOLK SE0A 4
715 1975 VOLK SEDA 4
716 1975 VOLK SEDA 4
717 1975 VOLK THAN 4
4 12 0680 0700 — 55 49 — +14 +10
4 8 1800 0900 ~ 99 99 ~ +04 +02 -
4 14 1100 1000 — 61 50 — 000 000 -
4 12 1100 0950 0950 52 50 50 000 000 000
5 12 0920 0850 —
4 12 ------
. ... 0820 0850 «
4 15 1250 0850 --
5 15 0700 0850 0850
59 57 ~
66 57 —
+09 +12
__ ^. +18 +12 -
55 54 __ +16 +08 -
,/T -r i v -rww —
54 54 +07 +08 +08
49 -05 -05 -05
46 +05 -05 -05
7
'18 1975 VOLK RABB 4 90 2
,'19 1975 VOLK RABB 4 90 2
720 1975 VOLV 242G 4 121 0
046 1974 AMMO HORN 8 304 2
047 1974 BUIC HIVI
048 1974 BDIC CENT
049 1974 CHEV VEGA
050 1974 CHEV MONT 8 350
051 1974 CHEV NOVA 6 250
052 1974 CHEV CAMA 8 350 2
4 11 0900 0875 0900 49 4
4 11 0800 0875 0875 46 4- ,„ T^ -^ _
4 11 0750 0900 0900 44 44 44 +02 -05 -0
4 15 0630 0900 0900 50 50 50 +05 -05 -0
4 12 1400 0925
4 12 1040 0925 _- ..
1 15 1010 0600 — 55 59 — +1
1 17 0620 0700 0840 35 30 30 +0i
057
8
1974 CHEV CAPR 8
1974 DODG CHAR 8
1974 DODG DART 6
1974 FORD PINT 1
1974 FORD HAVE
__ 44 44 — +03 -0
- 50 4,7 — +03 -0
+OL
+05 +05
0650 0810
0 0650 0880
15 0750 1000
10 0600 0830 29 30
0880 0850 0850 3:
0630 0600 0780 "
22 0640 0600
22 0650 0600
** | W*
oFo
iO +07 +04 +04
19 +27 +04 +04
12 +18 +12 +12
10 +05 +08 +08
+11 +08
+11 +08
iO +10 +08
!0 +06 +08
122 2 4
302 2 1
059 1974 FORD HAVE 6 250 1 1
060 19711 FORD LTD 8 400 2 1
118 2 1 20 0600 0750 0750 99 99 99 +03 000 000
25 1 1 16 0630 0750 0750 99 99 99 +09 000 000
0900 0750 0750 37 37 38 " "'
0570 0650 08i
1Q02
061 1974 FORD LTD T .„
062 1974 LINC CONT 8 460
063 1974 MERC MONT
064 1974 OLDS COTL
065 1974 OLDS DELT
066 1974 OLDS 98
iifell
M52»JS610 4
5 24
+02 +06 +06
000 +12 +12
2.0 2250 8.8 2 1
______ 1121
— ---1121
„ „ .--1121
1.6 2500 9.4 2 1 1 22
----- 1121
______ 1121
__ __ __ _ 1 i 2 1
0.6 3000 11.3 11121
2.0 2250
1.0 2250
2.8 2250
2 1 1 22
2 1 1 2 2
2 1 1 22
2.0 3000 10.3 21122
__ __ ._ _ i 1 2 1
__ __ __ _ 1 1 2 1
__ — — - 1 1 2 1
0.5 3500 12.3 11122
0.3
0.3
1.5
0.3
5000
4000
2750
4000
14.7
12.0
2 1
,18 2 1
- J25 1 1
8 400 2 1
8 350 2 1
119 2 4
2 70 4 1
4 97 2 4
1 97 1 4
15 0520 0600 0760
22 0520 0625 0860 99 99
22 0700 0625 0850 99 99
22 0640 0650 0800 99 99
27 0670 0650 0850
22 0590 0650 0780
26 0680 0650 0820
26 0650 0650 0860
20 0780 0750 0750
16 0780 0750 0750
26 0630 0650 0790
22 0700 0650 0820
15 0750 0750 0750
12 0740 0750 0970 ,. .. „
13 0690 0650 0650 55 54 54
11 1030 0900 0925 47 47 47
39 +04 +06 +06
59 +26 +12 +12
J9 +14 +12 +12
)9 +14 +14 +14
19 +10 +10 +10
!0 +18 +12 +12
10 +09 +12 +12
19 +12 +08 +08
9 +05 000 000
19 +06 000 000
10 +12 +12 +12
0 +11 +12 +12
0.2 99.9
7.1 0.5
.0 0.5
.0 0.5
125 7.9 0.3
70 3.0 0.4
100 1.5 0.4
120 5.5 99-9
0.6 4000 13.2 1 1
0.5 3500 11.2 2 1
0.6 2750 9.9 2 1
0.9 3500 12.3 1 1
225
170
170
70
160
2.5
2.2
0.5
0.2
0.2
.6 0.5
90 0.8 0.5
70 7.4 0.5
100 2.6 0.3
140 7.0 0.2
2.1 3000 10.3 2 1
0.6 4500 14.0 1 1
0.4 4500 14.0 1 1
0.3 5500 15.3 1 1
1.5 4500 14.0 1 1
0.4 ' '
Oil 5000 14.7 1
4000 13.2 1 1
5000 14.7 1 1
0.5 4000 13.2
0.5 3500 11.2 2 1
0.3 4500 14.0 1 1
0.4 4000 13-2 1 1
5 +13 +12 +12 1-
,0 -08 -10 -10 '
;4 +06 +07 +07 3
+12 +07 +07 2
11 0860 0875 0875
22 0450 0650 —
1II! 85 Si
SftSBBSi
!§ MS FORD LTD
a «B ^ %
AHMOGREM
52 50 45 +07 +07 +07 115 ..
10 — +08 +04 - 190 —
721 I971j
1 $
S BR
II
11
ii
CHEV
8 350 2 1
§ 400 2 1
8 400 2 1
8 351 2 1
I 880° I \
M
-570 0600 ~
0600 0600 —
24 30 ~ +15 +08
22 39 " +12
„ y ___ ,._ ,._
__ 25 0750 0750 9§ §9 99 +13+10+10
27 0580 0600 0790 33 30 30 000 +06 +06
300 —
160 —
600 150
350 225
».0 0.5
J.6 0.5
3.0 0.5
B.4 0.5
21 0680 0650
27 0725 0625
22 0650 0650
21 0470 0700
21 0710 0600
25 0500 0700
-, 0660 0650
26 0625 0650
CBEV nuyi
CHEV MONT
0700
32 — +14 +12 -
99 — +08 +12 -
§0 — +03 +12 -
32 32 +08 +05 +05
150 —
180 140
— 33 31 ~ +0!
— 26 29 — +1
0760 23 30 30 +1
— 99 99 — +0
3.1 0.4
0.2 0.4
0.5 0.5
10.0 1.5
0.4 99-9
-.4 1.0
o.r
__ _ 1
__ __ — - 1
1.5 4500 14.0 1 1
0.7 4500 12.7 2 1
__ __ — - 1
TTs 3000 10.3 2 1
1
1
1 2
1 2
0.3 4000 12.0 2
0.3 — —
0750
21 0620 0600
21 0430 0600
21 0600 0600
22 0650 0600
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.5
0 — +06 +04 - 75 -- 0.6
9 „ +09 +10 - 100 — 1.2
!2 32 +12 +12 +12 330 275 4.0
!2 — +10 +10 - 140 — 2.2
10 — +09 +08 - 390 -- 5.1 0.5
IO 30 ,+12 +06 +08 350 265 1.2 0.5
IO 30 +11 +08 +08 2000 1900 10.0 0.5
10 — +12 +08 - 170 — 3-2 0.5
1
__ __ — - 1
oTg 3000 10.3 2 1
__ — — - 1
0.2 3500 12.3 1 1
2.7 3500 12.3 1 1
0.3 3500 11.2 21121
0.5 4000 13.2 11121
0.1 4000 13.2 11121
0.1 5500 15.3 1 1 1 2 2
1 2 2
1 2 2
1 2 2
1 2 2
1 2 2
1 2 2
1 2 2
1 2 2
2 2
2 2
2 2
2 2
11122
122
1 2 2
1 2 2
1 2 2
1 2 2
1 2 2
1 2 2
1 2 2
1 2 2
2 2
2 1
1 2 1
1 2 1
1 2 2
2 1
2 2
1 2 2
1 2 1
1 2 1
1 2 2
1 2 1
A-7
-------
APPENDIX A.CONT'D
LISTING OF VEHICLES AND TEST PARAMETERS
DENVER
VEH YEAR MAKE MODL C CID V T FT RPMR RPMS RPMA DR DS £*_52«_^_IGA__IHC_IHCA__ICO_ICOS_ICOA INRT RLHP L P
;«"iQ7S"cHEv"MALiTi5o"r3"iro9oo"o9og""::"i§"3o"~ +°1 °°8 - "I ~ I-I 2-1 -:~~"-~~~H":~
CHEV MALI 8 350
'14 CHEV NOVA 8 350
4 CHEV NOVA 8 350
711 CHEV IMPA 8 MOO
738 1971 DODO CHAL 8
739 1971 DODG CHAR 8
740 '
711
742 1971 FORD PINT 1
' 1971 FORD PINT 1
2 3 22 0900 „„-- -,
2 1 21 1425 0900 -- 26
21 0785 0900
26 0600 0600
1971 DODG DART 6
1971 FORD PINT 1
,971 FORD PINT 1 110
1971 FORD MUST 6
171
250
171
713 1
KJ1
716 1971 FORD MAVE
717 1971 FORD MUST A .
718 1971 FORD MAVE 8 302
719 1971 FORD TORI 8 100
750 1971 FORD TORI 8 351
751 1971 FORD TORI 8 351
752 1971 FORD LTD 8 351
753 1971 FORD STAW 8 100
751 1971 MERC COME
755 1971 MERC COUG
756 1971 OLDS CUTL _
757 1971 OLDS CUTL 8
2 1 17 0760 0750 — 99 99
2 1 20 0920 0750 ~ 99 99
1 3 16 0900 0800 -- 99 99
2 4 13 0710 0750 0750 36 36
2 1 13 0710 0800 ~
2 1 12 0880 0850 0850 ..
2 1 12 0850 0800 0850 17
2 1 13 0920 0650
1 1 15 0620 0600 — 33 33
2 1 13 0180 0650 — 15 11
2 1 15 0720 0650 0850 26 26
2 1 27 0600 0625 ~ 99 99
UO5U MU 1U
0850 17 39
— 32 35
000 -
— +18 +08
— +10 +08 -
~ +09 +08 -
— +01 000 -
— +06 000 -
~ +05 000 -
36 +02 +06 +06
— +01 +0
10 +09 +06 +0
39 +01 +06 +0
-- +08 +12 -
— +06 +06 -
~ +12 +12 -
26 +10 +12 +12
— +12 +12 -
IHC IMCA ICO ICOS ICOA INRT RLHP L P CS CC
"~115~~- "i" o7i""H II II :—~
55 -- 0.7 0.5 - I j 2 i
180 II 3'5 99^9 -- II II I j 2 1
230 ~ 3.6 99.9 — -
220 — 3.7 0.5 — —
215 — 1.8 0.5 — —
330 115 3.2 0.5 0.3 2750
2 1 27 0625 0600 — 99 99 — +06 +06
2 1 27 0700 0600 -- 25 25 ~ +11 +10
2 1 15 0620 0600 ~ 21 21 -- +08 +06 -
2 1 21 0615 0625 0810 99 99 99 +10 +12 +12
1 3 15 0620 0750 — 35 35 — +05 +06 -
? ! 27 0650 0650 — 2? 2? -- +12 +11 -
30 +13+12 +12
0750 0650 — 29
22 0630 0650 0750 37
1 22
m
Z 1
360 2
100 1
350 2
350 2
758 1971 OLDS CUTL 8 350 1 1 22
759 1971 PLYH DUST 6 198 1 3 11
760 1971 PLYM DUST 6 225 1 1 1<
761 1971 PLYM DUST
762 1971 PLYM FRY3
763 1971 PLYM FURY
764 1971 PONT FIRE
765 1971 PONT LEMA
766 1971 PONT CATA 8 100 2
767 1971 PONT LEMA 8 100 2
768 1971 AUDI 100L 4 114 2 4
769 1971 CAPR SPOR 6 171 2 1
770 1971 COLT SEDA 4 98 2 4
771 1971 DATS SEDA 4 78 2 4
772 1971 DATS 710 1 119 2 1
773 1971 FIAT 128 1 79 2 1
0580 0650 0720 29
0790 0800 — 99
0900 0750 0750
0750 0750 0750
30 30 +U
-- +06
+12 +12
+02 -
25 0620 0750 0750
25 0810 0900 —
22 0600 0650 ~
22 0590 0650 0770
26
22
0630 0650 —
~ 21
~ 2
0960 1000 — 1
0765 0650 — 37
99 99 +10 000 000
99 99 +07 000 000
99 +06 +05 +05
— +11 +05 -
— +09 +12 -
30 30 +10 +12 +12
— +18 +12 -
3 1110 0850 0850 50 50 50 +15 000 000
2 1450 0800 ~ 36 49 —
3 1050 0800 — -
0 1020 0900 ~
777 1
128
280 .
71 TOYO CORO 1
71 TOYO CORO 4
778 1971
779 197
780
1971
1971
101 1973
102 1973
103
101
197-
1972
105 1973
106 1973
107 1973
108 1973
109 1973
110 197:
VOLK SEDA 4
VOLK 412 4 1
VOLV 142 4 12
AMMO HORN 6 232
BUIC ELEC 8 45
CADI DEVI 8 4?
CHEV VEGA
CHEV MALI
CHEV NOVA 8 350
CHEV IMPA 8 350
CHEV IMPA 8 350
CHEV IMPA 8 400
+15 +05
49 — +12 +12
55 — +26 000
0850 65 55
10 6650 0650 41
1020 0750 0750 1
1080 0875 —
0 1 13 0960 0960 —
0 1 16 1100 0900 0900
1 1 16 0590 0550 0700
1 1 26 0780 0650 0720 28
1 1 27 0150 0600 0700 33
21 11 1125 1200 1000 30
2 1 22 0510 0600 0750 29
2 1 21 0550 0600 0900 30
2 1 26 0695 0600 0§90 26
2 1 26 0630 0600 0790 22
2 1 26 0620 0600 0820
DODG DART 6 225 1 1 16 0850 0750
?°i«> "NT 1 122 2 1 11 0520 0650 0
MAVE
FORD CUST
FORD LTD
MERC MONR
OLDS 98
OLDS CUTL
PLYM SATE
PLYM DUST
PONT CATA
PONT LEMA
DATS TRUC
OPEL MAN?
TOYO CORO
VOLK KOMB
VOLK SEDA
BUIC CENT
BUIC ELEC
CHEV MALI
DODG CHAR
FORD PINT
FORD LTD
0450
1 22 0640 Ol
1 1 22 0570 0650 0750 29
2 1 20 0750 0700 0700 99
1 1 16 0700 0750 0750 99
2 1 26 0600 0650 0820 29
8 350 2 1 22 0700 0650 0770 30 30 30 +09 +12 +12
I ,?f 2 1 12 0800 0800 o|oO 59 55 51 +06 +05 +05
* US i 5 12 05?° 0850 0850 50 50 50 000 000 000
1 97 2 4 12 0510 0750 0750 65 51 52 -05 +05 +05
103 2 -,
97 1 1
1 16 1100 0900 0900 44 44 44 -10 -10 -10
11 1060 0950 0850 45 15 15 -09 -05 -05
0610 0650 — 30 30 — +06 +04 -
0620 0650 — 30 30 — . +05 +01 -
9.9 2
06 31
0 ~
0 230
1.8 99.5
8.0 0.1
55 +12 000 000
— +12 -01 -
._ 52 +14 +07 +07
51 51 000 +05 +05
— +08 +07 -
~ +08 +07 -
59 +07 +10 +10
34 +17 +05 +05
+07 +01 +01
50 +02 +08 +08
c. J1 +11 +10 +10
10 30 +13 +08 +08
30 +13 +08 +08
30 +18 +08 +08
30 +12 +08 +08
+12 +08 +08
19 99 -13 000 000
17 39 -03 +09 +09
!$ 29 000 +0b +06
30 30 +10 +10 +10
27 26 +08 +12 +12
30 000 +06
30 +08 —
30 +09 +12+12
-04 000 000
+03 000 000
+14 +12 +12
..- ... 1.5 2750 992
!00 220 10.0 0.1 0.7 3000 113 1
80 — 1.6 99.9 — — -- -
.2 99.9
.5 0.5
3-9 0.5
0.4
99.9 —
220 — 1.5 0.5
180 ~ 0.7 99.9
0.6 ~ '
1.3
99.
0.
0.5 99.<
0.3 o.f
3.0 0.5
1.2 O.e
125 130 0.6 0.5
270 — 3.6 oe
270 130 6.2 0.5
100 110 '
130 150
210 ~
210 —
335 180
5.9 0.5
1.0 0.3
2.0 99.9
4.0 2.0
0.2 0.4
710 250 9.8
280 — 4.0
350 _ I.'*
600 310 0.2
175 200 10.0
150
150
85 70
110 130
320 110
90 50
8.7 99.!
0.6 99.5
IS ?:j 8:1
100 150
230 270
550 110
350 10
180 130
50 200
180 90
230 50
190 70
200 100
10.0 99.S
5.0 99.S
g.2 fe.j
0.-
40 20
190 100
lfo II
8 350 2 1 22 0510 0600 —
§ flS I 1 ?9 °Z8° °700 0700
1 122 2 4 11 0810 0750 0750
8 100 2 1 21 0550 0625 -- 2«
— +12 +06 - 60 —
.. r. +05 000 000
!)0 40 -05 +06 +06
24 — +05 +06 -
290 150
240 110
100 —
3.4 0.6
0.5 1.5
1S:5° 9U
1:1
1.2
2.2
1:1 98:
1-2 8:!
9.8 99
0.2 99
1.9 2500 10.3 1
0.4 5000 14.7 1
0.1 1000 1372 1
0.2 1000 13.2 1
O.C
O.t
3500 12.3 1
3500 12.3 1
1.7 1500 14.0 1 1
II II II I 1
0.1 1000 13.2 1 1
__ ._ ... i
__ __ ^
__ __ ... 1
3.5 2500 9.1 2 1
II II II I 1
__ __ — . 1
II!
II
2 I
2 2
2 2
2 2
2 2
2 2
2 2
2 t
2 2
2 t
2 2
2 2
2 2
2 2
2 2
2 2
2 2
2 2
2 2
2 2
2 1
2 1
2 2
2 2
2 2
2 1
1:1
__ — - 1
3000 10.3 2 1
3000 10.3 2 1
0.5
0.4
0.2 3000
?;! h
0.7 1500
0.4 1500
0.1 1500
0.3 1500
0.5 1000
0.3 1000
0.5 3000
0.3 1500
0.3 1000
1.5 2500
2.2 2500
1.4 2250
1.0 3000
1.7 2250 8.8 2 1 121
T7o 2750 §7? 2 1 122
1.4 2250 8.8 2 1 122
5000 13.1 ? 1
... 5500 15.3 1
0.8 2750 9.9 2 1
0.1 1000 13-2 1 1
0.1 3500 11.2 2 1
0.4 5500 11.0
0.3 1500 11.0 1 1
0.5 1500 11.0 1 1
11.0 1
11.0 1
14.0
11.0 1 1
ii
2 2
2 2
ii
2 2
2 1
i!
II
— - 1
573 1000 12-0 2 ]
0.3 3000 10:3 2 i
ij
ii
A-8
-------
APPENDIX A.CONT'D
LISTING OF VEHICLES AND TEST PARAMETERS
DENVER
HODL C CID V T FT RPMR RPMS RPMA DR DS DA IGR IGS IGA IHC IHCA ICO ICOS ICOA INRT RLHP L P CS CC AP
VEHJEAHWKE .-----------------------~------g-^
781 1973 AMMO
782 1973 A1*10
7« 973 AMMO
781 1973 BUIC
785 1973 BUIC
785 973 BUIC
78? 1973 BUIC
78$ 1973 CADI
THND 8
CUTL 8
98 ?
2000 4
HORN 6
HORN 8
MATA 6
CENT 8
CENT 8
LESA 8
LESA 8
DEVI 8
U60 4
455 4
122 2
304 2
258 1
350 4
1 23 0400 —^- —.
1 22 0460 0650 --
If 12 0740 0750 —
1 16 0645 0600 --
1 16 0560 0700 1080
1 20 0540 0550 —
1 22 0560 0650 —
+12 -
_ 29 29
30 30 — +0
32 32 — +11 +05 -
28 30 30 +04 +05 +05
-'• 34 — +OU +03 -
3- -' 04 -
__
29 30 — +04 +04
250
105 --
200 ~
270 —
370 280
120 —
150 —
1973 CADI
DEVI 8
VEGA 4
W 197^ CHEV VEGA
792 1973 CHEV VEGA
— 25
0670 6650 -- 31
0440 0600 0760 30
0670 0650
0860 0650
30 — +04 +04 - 65
go — +10 +04 - 210
30 — +08 +04 - 180
30 30 +08 +08 +08 1300
200
.. . 0.2 5000 14.7 11122
0.2 99-9 — — — - 1 1 2 2
0.1 0.3 — — — 1122
2.1 99.9 — — — 1122
3.8 1.5 -- — — - 1 1 2 2
8.2 1.0 0.5 3500 12.3 11121
2.1) 1.5 — - — - 1 1 2 2
1.0 99.9 — — — 1121
1.4 99.9 — — — 1121
2.5 99.9 — — — 1121
3-2 99.9 — -- ---1121
3.9 1.0 1.0 5500 15.3 11121
1 28 0580 0600 — 28 30 — +07 +08 - 230 --
H 11 0680 1200 1200 33 33 33 +14 +10 +10 2000
1 11 1070 0750 0970 29 3] 31 +12 +12 +12 100
1 11 0750 0750 — 30
6.0 1.0 — — — - 1 1
320 10.0 99.9 0.9 2750 9.9 2 1 1
._.._._._ .-- 110 2.4 99.9 0.3 2500 9.421 1
1 — +18 +12 - 420 — 2.8 99-9 -- — — - 1 1
1973 CHEV
1973 CHEV
1973 CHEV
1973 CHEV
NOVA 6
NOVA 8
NOVA 8
NOVA 8
250 1
307 2
307 2
350 2
1 21 0540 0600 —
1 21 0670 0600 --
1 21 0550 0600 0870
1 21 0620 0600 —
32 33 — +08 +06
30 15 — +12
36
29
220
. ... .-08 - 160
|6 30 +18 +08 +08 1450
— +10 +08 - 190
150
4.2 99.9 -- — — - 1 1 2
3.4 99.9 — — ---112
0.7 99.9 1.0 3500 12.3 1112
3-8 99.9 -- — — - 1 1 2
797 1973 CHEV CAPR 8 400 2
79& 1973 CHEV CHEL 8 350 2
799 1973 CHEV NOVA 8 307 2
800 1973 CHEV MALI 8 350 2
801 1973 CHEV LAGU 8 350 4
802 1973 CHEV IMPA 8 350 2
803 1973 CHEV IMPA 8 350 2
80$ 1973 CHEV IMPA 8 350 4
1 26 0740 0600 -
1 22 0640 0600 -
1 21 0420 0600 -
1 22 0580 0600 -
1 22 0610 0600 -
1 26 0550 0650 -
1 26 0430 0600 -
1 26 0520 0600 -
._ 30 30 ~ +14 +08 150
- 28 30 — +07 +08 - 70
,1 30 -- +10 +08 - 300
:0 30 — +07 +08 150
0 30 — +11 +12 80
6 30 — +04 +08 280
0 30 — +09 +08 350
- 27 30 — +18 +12 240
3-0 99.9 —
0.2 99.9 --
5.4 99.9 —
0.5 99.9 --
0.1 99.9 —
1.2 99-9 ~
4.6 99.9 —
3-8 99.9 --
350 4
1(00 4
..4 ... CHEV IMPA 8 350 2
808 1973 CHEV STAW 8 454
805 1973 CHEV MONT
506 1973 CHEV IMPA
1973
1 22 0570 0600 — 30 30 ~ +13 +12 140 —
1 22 0580 0600 — 27 30 — +11 +08 100 —
1 26 0530 0600 — 25 30 — +10 +08 - 220 ~
4 1 22 0620 0600 0800 27 30 30 +06 +10 +10 1280 220
809 1973 CHRY NEWP
810 1973 CHHY NEWY
811 1973 DODG DART
812 1973 DODG DART
400
440
2 1 23
4 1 23
225 1 1 1E
318 2 1 16
+10 +10 340
+10 +10 330
0620 0750 0750 99 99 99 +02 000 000 260
0730 0700 0700 99 99 99 000 000 000 200
0730 0700 0700 99 99 99 +1
0785 0700 0900 99 99 99 +24
813 1973 DODG CHAR 8 400 4
811)1973 * -
DODG DART 8 318 2
§15 !?73 FORD PINT 4 122 2
816
1973 FORD PINT 4 122 2
4 20 0740 0900 0900
1 16 0680 0700 0700 9
1 11 0740 0650 — 5
4 11 0655 0750 — 55
99 99 +10 +02 +02 2000
220
120
110
110
1200
150
0.5 4500 14.0
1.5 4500 14.0
0.5 3000 10.3
0.4 3000 10.3
1112
1112
2112
2112
9 99 99 -02 000 000 305 15
4 1(1 — +17 +09 - 375 ~
5 41 08 +06 195 ~
817 973 FORD STAW 4 122
818 1973 FORD PINT 4 122
III Wl PORD "AYE 6 200
820 1973 FORD HAVE 6 250
11 0900 0750 — 39 39 — +08
-- -*-- 35 37 + -
2 4 >._
2 1 11 0965 0650
1 4 15 0700 0750 — 33
1 1 15 0560 0600 0780 40
16
+06
t-09
— +03 +oe
39 +04 +06
1-06
170
215
230
230
823
821
§21 973 FORD HAVE
122 973 FORD HAVE
1973 FORD MUST
1973 FORD HAVE
§25 1973 FORD HAVE
§26 973 FORD LTD
III llll FORD LTD
828 1973 FORD TORI
§29 1973 FORD GALA
§3° 973 LINC CONT
III 973 MERC COME
8« 1973 MERC HONG
§33 1973 MERC MONT
HI "3 OLDS CUTL
$ W §LLB! g|ft
® aa %g gg
as DDii?
88 a»
1975 gg VF!£
III
\ 888 Sfi
! HDo5§ $
IPB
I *RS ^ '
8 302
6 250
8 302
8 302
6 250
8 429
8 400
8 351
8 100
8 1)60
8 351
8 HOO
§ 350
2 1 15 0605 0650 0835 29 28 28 +01 +06 +06 320
1 1 15 0665 0600 0860 36 36 36 +15 +06 +06 640
2 1 20 0540 0650 0950 24 24 24 +04 +06 +06 1120
2 1 15 0600 0650 0725 33 29 29 000 +06 +06 270
100
110
270
980
220
5.2 0.5 0.5 4000 13.2 1 1
8.7 0.5 0.5 3000 11.3 1 1
4.5 99.9 — — — - 1
4.5 99.9 — -- -- - 1
3.6 99.9 — — — - 1
0.2 99.9 — — — - 1
il.i) 99.9 __ __ — - 1
7.0 99.9 3.0 3000 10.3 2 1
8.4 99.9 0.5 3000 11.3 1 1
4.2 99.9 2.2 3000 10.3 2 1
8.2 99.9 2.9 3500 11.2 2 1
6.8 99.9 0.3 3000 11.3 1 1
1 1 15 0600 0600 — HH 39 02 +06 - 150 —
4 1 21 0890 0650 0840 34 29 29 +10 +14 +14 200 130
2 1 22 0475 0625 — 45 30 -- +12 +06 - 250 --
2 1 23 0650 0625 0960 33 30 30 +10 +10 +10 320 40
2 1 22 0590 0700 —
4 1 22 0550 0650 —
1 1 15 0575 0600 0820 ..
2 1 23 0450 0600 — 2
99 99 — +0
31 36 — +1
6 36 41
10 170
... .12 - 120
. 36 412 +06 +06
0 — +05 +06 -
;00 8
:40 —
80
3.6 99.9 —
6.8 99.9 0.3 5000 14.7 1 1
4.2 99.9 -- ~ — - 1
6.4 99.9 0.9 4000 13-2 1 1
0.6 99.9 --
2.0 99-9 ~
7.8 99 " "
4.2 C
§7'
840 197;
841 197'
842 197:
843 llr
845 \ll
2 1 22 0625 0625 —
4 1 22 0610 0650 —
W 8I11888 8§i8 °??.u
?l? if \ ?? °P35 0650 0785
111 \ \ J§ 0690 0750 —
ail I 3 1£ °7i° °750 °750
318 2 1 16 0580 0700 0700
28 30 — +05 +06 200
28 30 — +10 +12 - 200
18 -3? :N :1f +i2 ?i8 -?.'
0.7 99.9
.6 0.3
2 1 20 0700 0700
2 20 0760 0700
I \ II W& 8g8
180
200
110
170
2 1 22
2 1 26
2 1 26
1 22 0600
" 0615
07.25
46
4 1 22 0650
2 4 12 0725
2 4 16 0800
2 4 10 1300
4 1 17 0680
4 4 17 Q705
2 4 12 0700
2 5 16 0750
0650
0650
0650
0650
0650
0800
0750
0750
0750
0900
0850
0900
29 30 30 +11 +12 +12 150
99 99 — +08 000 - 390
99 99 99 +08 000 000 235
99 99 99 +02 000 000 410
— 99 99 — 000 000 - 85
0700 99 99 99 +06 000 000 175
0750 99 99 99 +04 +05 +05 220
0740 25 30 30 +20 +12 +12 70
0700 30 30 30 +12 +12 +12 720
0730 32 30 30 +11 +12 +12 440
— 30 30 — +28 +12 - 370
— 31 30 — +06 +12 - 190
OJ40 30 30 30 +12 +12 +12
0850 50 50 50 +15 +08 +08
SZ50 35 25 35 +10 +07 +07
0800 55 55 55 +05 000 000
-- 57 57 10 -10 2000 --
-- 59 59 — +11 +10 - 20 ~
0850 59 60 60 +08 +11 +11 1050 420
0900 3o 53 53 +25 +27 +27 430 200
0.6 0.5
6.0 0.5
5.8 1.0
3.2 0.2
1
— - 1
0.6 3000 10.3 2 1
__ .. — 1
_. — - 1
1.5 4000 13.2 1 1
0.3 4000 13-2 1 1
575 3000 11.3 1 1
0.5 3000 11.3 1 1
__ __ — - 1
0.5 4000 12.0 2 1
1.0 4000 13-2 1 1
0.2 3500 12.3 1 1
0.3 4000 12.0 2 1
0.6 4000 13-2 1 1
3.0
0.1 9<
2.9
3.0
.0
..9
2.5
3.0
1.3 5000 14.7 1 1
1.5 2750 9.9 2 1
2.7 2750 9.9 2 1
1.5 1750 7.7 2 1
„ „ — - 1
„ „ — - 1
2.5 2500 9.4 2 1
5.6 2500 9.4 2 1
1121
— - 1 121
— - 1 122
1121
1121
1121
— - 1 122
— - 1 121
2.3 99.9 — — — - 1 1 2 1
3.5 99.9 ~ ~ — - 1 1 2 1
0.4 99.9 — — — - 1 1 2 1
1.8 99.9 1.3 5000 14.7 11121
1 2 2
1 2 2
1 2 2
1 2 2
1 2 2
1 2 2
1 2 2
1 2 2
1 2 2
1 2 2
1 2 2
1 2 2
2 2
2 2
2 2
2 2
1 2 2
1 2 2
1 2 2
1 2 2
1 2 2
1 2 2
1 2 2
1 2 2
1 2 2
1 2 2
1 2 2
1 2 2
1 2 2
1 2 2
1 2 2
1 2 2
1 2 2
1 2 2
2 2
2 2
2 1 1
1 2 2
2 1
2 1
2 1
2 2
A-9
-------
APPENDIX A.CONT'D
LISTING OF VEHICLES AND TEST PARAMETERS
DENVER
VEH YEAR MAKE MODL C CID V T FT RPMR RPMS RPMf_»«_^_^_f2Lf°!_"*__™-f"--_™™2!_™_INRT RLHP L P CS CC if
197;
197:
859 197-
860 197:
TOYO STAW 4
TOYO CORO 4
TOYO STAW 4
SUBA STAW 4
"11 0820 0750 0750 38
12 0920 0750 ~ 51
}l o150 PkQ --^- ~
810 Oi
18 38 +24 +05 +05
51 „ +04 +05 -
__ _,„ 54 _- +05 +07 -
)6 0800 57 54 54 +03 +06 +06
140 2
861 1973 VOLK SEDA 4
862 1973 VOLK SEDA 4
863 1973 VOLK SEDA 4
864 1973 VOLV 142S 4
076 1972 AMMO GREM 6
077 1972 BOIC RIVI
078 1972 CADI DEVI
079 1972 CHEV VEGA
080 1972 CHEV MALI 8
081 1972 CHEV CHEL 8
082 1972 CHEV NOVA 8
083 1972 CHEV IMPA 8
085 1§72 DODG CORO 8
086 1972 FORD PINT 4 122 2
087 1972 FORD GRNT 8
088 1972 FORD HAVE
089 1972 FORD GALA
090 1972 FORD STAW
091 1972 MERC HONG
1 4
2 4
11 1400 0950
11 1100 1000
11 1400 0900 _
15 0820 0800 0800 70
__ JIB 48 — +07 +07
— 55 50 — +04 +07 -
iQOO 50 50 50 +12 -05 -05
""" 62 62 +08 +10 +10
+03
04
21 0590 0550 0640
26 0500 0650 0850
28 0750 0600 0710
11 0860 1200 1200
19 0620 0600 0850 ..
19 0700 0600 0780 30 ..- —
16 0470 0600 0950 29 30 30 ... .— .—
24 0500 0600 0830 27 30 30 +05 +06 +06
2 +08 +01 _,
+05 +0lj +OJ
0 +11 +08 +08
12 +14 +08 +08
+19 +06 +06
+08 +08 +0(
+08 +08 +06
1972 CHEV BELA 8
1972
24 0740 0600 0900
21 0620 0750 0750
11 0940 0750 0750
06;
2 1 23 0620 0575 0720 33
+12 +06 +06
„ ., +04 000 000
36 36 +35 +06 +06
29 29 +05 +06 +06
32 30 30
99 99 99
5Q 36 3§
2 1
15 0620 0600 0780 37 35 35 +06 +06 +06
22 0630 0625 0860 29 29 29 +06 +06 +0
21 0520 0625 0810 29 29 29 +14 +08 +0
23 0550 0625 0800 29 29 29 +21 +08 +0
35
092 1972 OLDS CUTL 8 350 2 1
093 1972 PLYM VALI 6 225 1 1
094 1972 PLYM FURY 8 360 2 1
095 1972 PONT CATA 8 400 2 1
0490 0650 0620
0480 0750 0750
23 0590 0750 0750
0615 0625 0740
096 1972 PONT LEMA 8 350 2 1 20 0740 0625 0720
097 1972 DATS 510 4 97 2 4 12 0800 0700 07.00
098 1972 TOYO CORO 4 "
099 1972 VOLK KARM 4
2 TOYO CORO 4 120 24 13 0786 0650 6650 71 52
97 1 4 11 0840 0840 0840 49 49
30 30 +11 +08 +08
41 41 +07 000 000
2 +09 000 000
0 +10 +10 +10
30 JO gO +14 +10 +10
+05 +07 +07
12 000 +07 +07
9 -05 -05 -05
3.5 99.9
3.5 0.1
340 8.8 99.
145 10.0 '
80 8.5
4.8 99.9
270
0.5
0.5
' "
4.0
8.1
.0 99
1.0 3.0
4.6 99.9
100 1972 VOLK KOMB 4
390 1972 BUIC SKYL 8
~-~ 1972 CHEV CHEL 8
1972 CHEV KING 8
103 2 .
(50 2 1 1
4 16 0850 0850 0820 6!
" 0480 0650 — "
48 48 -07 -05 -05 1520 160
. 26 30 — +09 +04 - 380 —
350 2 1 19 0450 0600 — 26 30 — +08 +06 - 350 — .
350 2 1 23 0620 0600 0800 26 30 30 +07 +06 +06 230 150 7.2
1972 CHRY NEWP 8 400 2
... 1972 DODG DART 8 318 2
401 1972 FORD PINT 4 122 2
402 1972 FORD MAVE 8 302 2
1 23 0700 0700 0700 99
1 16 0640 0750 0750
1 11 0680 0650 0700
1 15 0525 0600 —
99 +11 +07 +07
99 +06 000 000
,_ 36 +01 +06 +06
58 — 000 +06 - 2
220
420
170
150
403 1972 FORD GALA
404 1972
40r
40
r_ 2 1 22 0540 0625 —
72 FORD LTD § 429 4 1 22 0455 0600 0820
1572 LINC CONT 8 460 4 1 24 0550 0625 ~
1972 MERC MONT 8 351 2 1 23 0500 0575 —
J9 -- +02 +06 -
.. 26 26 +13 +10 +10
52 32 — +08 +06 -
30 30 — +04 +06
820 1080 3.1 99.5
"0 — 4:5 99.<
90 —
30 95
40 — ..
320 — 4.5 99.9
409 1972 OLDS NNTY 8 455 4 1 25
0550 0600 — 27 30 — +11 +08 - 220
0760 0750 0750 23 32 32 +13 +05 +02 600
... _ _ .„„ , , 25 0720 0650 — 30 30 — +12 +10 - 190
865 1972 AMMO GREM 6 232 1 3 21 0590 0600 0600 45 31 31 +03 +05 +05 480
410 1972 PLYM VALI 8 3ll
1§72 PONT GRNV 8 455
2 1 15
41
866 1972 AMMO HORN 6 232 1
867 1972 BUIC SKYL 8 350 2
868 1972 BUIC LASA 8 350 4
869 1972 BUIC USA 8 350 4
870 1972 BUIC LASA 8
871 1972 CADI DEVI 8
872 1972 CADI DEVI 8
873 1972 CHEV VEGA 4
455 4
472 4
472 4
16 0720 0550 —
19 0570 0650 —
26 0640 0650 —
26 0650 0650 —
26 0620 0650 —
28 0640 0600 —
28 0600 0600
28
28
30
30
- +06 +05. - 330
30 — +05 +64 -
30 — +02 +04 -
30 -- +04 +04 -
140 2 4 11 1500 0850 —
1972 CHEV VEGA 4 140 1 3 11 1025 0850
1972 CHEV VEGA 4 140 1 1 11 '-" "??"
1972 CHEV - - - -
1972 CHEV
0665
0850
1972 CHEV NOVA 6 250 1 3
1972 CHEV CAMA § 307 2 1
1972 CHEV NOVA 8 350 2 1
1972 CHEV NOVA 8 350 2 1
1972 CHEV MALI 8 307 2 1
1972 CHEV MALI 8 307 2 1
1972 CHEV MALI 8 307 2 1
1972 CHEV CHEL 8 350 2 1
1972 CHEV MONT 8 350 4 1
1972 CHEV NOVA 8 350 2 1
1972 CHEV IMPA 8 400 2 1
1972 CHEV MONT 8 350 2 1
0540
062
197? CHEV NOVA 8 JJ50
4 4
.— 4 1
400 4 1
454 4 1
894
m
1972 CHEV MONT
1972 CHEV IMPA
1972 CHEV CHEL
1972 CHRY NEWP 8 400 2 1
1972 DODG DART 6 225 1 1
- 1972 DODG DART 6 225 1 3
7 1972 DODG DART 8 318 2 1
0700
0600
- -520 0600
16 0580 0600
19 0450 0600
19 0745 0600
19 0600 0600
16 0520 0600
19 0575 0600
16 0600 0600
24 0485 0600
19 0735 0600
16 0600 09
19 0550 05
24 0580 06
23 0680 06
30 30 — +09 +04 - 140
31 30 -- +16 +08 - 120
30 30 — +09 +08 -
33 31 — +04 +06 -
4 34 +05 +06 +06 450
— +04 +Q8 - 200
80
425
3 — +06 +04 180
10 — +08 +08 - 620
— +03 +0
-- +11 +06
10 — +01 +08 - 320
JO 30 +10 +08 +08 860
9 30 — +07 +08 - 600
11 30 30 +09 +06 +06
0750 31
0760 30
0800 17 30 30 +1
0900
0710
22 30 30 +09 +0:
16 30 30 +15 +0
JO 30 — +06 +0
J2 30 — +12 +OI
23 0530 0700
16 0790 0750
16 0910 0750
16 0780 0750
0700 28 28 28 +11 +05 +05 250
0750 43 43 43 +04 000 000 340
— 43 41 — +10 000 - 200
0750 30 30 30 +08 000 000 315
30 +02 +08 +08 400
30 +09 +06 +06 440
— +13 +06 - 380
8 +0
1.5 2250 (U 2 1
3.0 2250 S
2.5 3000 1C
1.0 2750
1.
4500
5000
0.5 2500
)500 12.3
5500 11J
1 1
2 1
?:8
0.7
0.3
U 88 1M ill!
1.0 2250 8.8 2 1 12
0.7 3500 12.3 1112
1500 11.2 2
1500 14.0 1 1
1.2 2500 9.4 2 1
0.1 4500 14.0 1 1
3.5
.4
576 3500 1K2 2
T~0 3500 11-2 2
T?3 3500 12.3 1
0.2 4000 13.2 1
0.7 3500 11.2 2
0?4 4000 13-2 1
4.8
1.2
3500 12.:
4000 13-
110 1.
3.2 4500 14.0 1
Sis 3000 10:3 2
0~5 3000 11-3 1
II
\\
22
22
0.4 4500 14:o 1 1 122
0.1 4000 13.2 11 122
1500 12.3 11122
1000 10.3 21122
000 13.2 11122
""" 14.0 11122
0.8
500 11.2 21122
_ 250 8.8 2 1 2 1 2
2.4 2500 J.4 2 1 122
3-0 2250 8.8 2 1 122
0.4 3000 10.3 21122
- 1122
__ __ ..-1121
0.3 5000 14.7 11122
0.5 4500 14.0 11122
0.5 3000 11.3 1 1 1 22
1.2 2500 9.4 2 1 122
— 1122
0.3 4500 14.0 1 1 1 22
II II II I 1 1 2 2
._ — .--1122
0.5 3000 11.3 I] 1|2
?7l 2750 9-9 2 1 212
ii ii ii :! Hi
ii ii mill!
---- E E=lli|
II II 1122
1.3 2500 9.4 21 122
\\\
n
l
A-10
-------
APPENDIX A.CONT'D
LISTING OF VEHICLES AND TEST PARAMETERS
DENVER
T FT RPMR RPMS RPMA DR DS DA IGR IGS IGA IHC IHCA ICO ICOS ICOA INRT RLHP L P CS CC AP
MODL C CID V T FT RPMR RPMS RPMA OH U5 UA IUK ll»a 1UA im, im,A itu 1UOS ICOA INRT RLHP L P CS CC AP
V^H !&*" -—"TT-^Z^Z^rtTert /\Tcn 31 31 31 ^.13 nnn nnn 1£11A i^n m n oo o 1 f, imnn i^ i i < * -»~~Z
698"J972
899 972
$ iig FOR?
-3; 1972 FORD
,05 1972 FORD
8
U
PINT 4 9
PINT 1 9
160 2
122 2
1
010 1972 FOHD
|l 972 FORD
I \2 972 HERC
913 1972 HERC
HAVE 6
MUST 8
HAVE 8
HAVE 8
6
8
STAW 8
LTD 8
LTD 8
GALA 8
COME 6
MONT 8
200 1
351 1
302 2
302 2
250 1
100 2
351 2
529 4
1 23 0550 0750 0750
1? 0688 0650 0725
U 11 1020 0900 0900
1 11 0820 0900 0900
3 15 0620 0750 0750
1 20 0585 0575 0§95
1 15 0620 0600 0820
1 15 0525 0600 --
1 15 0620 0600 1000
1 22 0595 0625 0830
1 21 0620 0575 —
1 21 0610 0600 0770
+13 ooo ooo
+08 +06 +06
+10 +12 +12
+08
P36 36 -10 +06 +06 130
31 31 +12 +06 +06 940
27 27 +17 +06 +06 2000
32 30 -- +03 +06 - 330
38 38 +08 +06 +06 1060
30 30 +14 +08 +08 300
— +08 +06 - 400
26 +08 +10 +10 100
91ii 1972
65 1572
16 1972
917 1972
ol? 1972
519 1972
;;0 1972
921 1972
OLDS CUTL 8
OLDS CUTL 8
OLDS DELT 8
OLDS CUTL 8
OLDS DELT 8
PLYM VALI 6
PLYM DUST 6
PLYM SATE 8
100
100
250
351
150
J50
1 22 0600 0625 — 3J 26 — +08 +08 -
22 0560 0625 07§0 26 28 28 +15 +08 +08
1 15 0650 0600 0780 28 38 38 +08 +06 +06
1 23 0605 0600 — 34 30 03 +06 -
350 4
350 2
1 20 0520 0650 —
1 20 0640 0650 —
1 25 0510 0600 --
1 20 0560 0650 —
30 30 — +11 +08
27 30 — +11 +08
32 30 — +18 +12
32 30 — +11 +08
1 25 0630 0600 — 28 30 ~ +06 +08 -
3 16 0670 0800 0800 41 41 11 +02 +02 +02
1 16 0710 0750 — 46 41 05 000 -
1 21 0710 0750 — 29 30 — +01 +02
922 1972 PLYM SCAM 8 318 2
25 1972 PONT VENT 8 350 2
525 1972 PONT STAH 8 350 2
2: 1972 PONT LENA 8 350 2
1 16 0810 0750 ~ 32
1 16 0650 0625 — 23
1 23 0640 0625 -- 28
1 20 0660 0625 0750 25
32 — +04 000
30 — +18 +10
JO — +09 +10 -
30 30 +17 +10 +10
926 1972 PONT LENA 8 400 4 1 20 0770 0700 — 29 30 ~ +15 +08 -
927 1972 PONT CATA 8 400 2 1 26 0610 0625 ~ 34 JO — +OJ +14 -
926 1972 CAPR COUP 4 98 2 4 12 0790 0750 ~ 28 36 — +06 +06 -
929 1972 DATS B110 4 72 2 4 11 0745 0700 0700 53 53 53 +08 +05 +05
931 1972 OPEL . .
932 1972 TOKO CORO 4
933 1972 TOYO STAW 4
71 1 4 12 0495 0650 0650 60 52 52 000 +05
97 2 1 11 0650 0650 0800 55 54 54 +10 +05
+05
+05
931 1972 VOLK SEDA 4 97 1 4 11 0880 0800 -- 60 48 05 -05 -
935 J972 VOLK CONV 4 97 1 4 11 0875 0875 0875 52 52 52 -05 -05 -05
936 1972 VOLK STAW 1 103 1 4 13 0825 0850 ~ 99 99 — +27 +27 -
120 10.0 99.9
150 7.6 1.2
300 1.5 99.9
400 9.0 99.9
1.6 4000 13.2 1
0.8 2250 8.8 2
1.7 2500 9.4 2 1
3.2 2500
M 2 1
50 1.7 99.9 0.6 2500 9.4 2 1
350 1.1 99.9 0.4 3500 11.2 2 1
270 O.j 99.9 1-4 3000 11.3 1
-- 2.6 99.9 -
45
420 120
200 —
300 ~
200 —
430 400
930 1972 DATS 510 4 97 2 4 12 0690 0700 0700 53 53 53 +04 +07 +07 600 600
1900 4 116 2 1 12 1045 0850 0850 45 50 50 +05 000 000 200 180
99.9
0.8 2500 9.4 2
3-0 4000 13.2 1
0.6 4500 li(To 1 i
— 0.6 99.9 - - 1
230 8.2 99.9 1.7 4000 13.2 1 1
120 5.9 99.9 1.5 3000 10.3 2 1
~ 3.0 99.9 1
0.6 99.9 --
3.6 99.9 ~
4.5 99.9 ~
2.4 99.9 —
— 0.4 99.9 1
90 8.8 0.5 0.5 3000 10.3 2 1
— 2.8 0.5 - - 1
-- 2.5 0.5 1
3-4 99-9 ~ --
3.4 99.9 -- —
1.8 99.9 — —
6.2 2.0 0.2 2000
7.4 2.0
3-4 99.9
o 10.0 3.0
.0 3-0
2.0 2250
1.0 2500
2.3 2000
2.0 2250
130 —
380 350
50 --
3.2 99.9 — —
J.2 3.0 2.6 2250
3.4 1.0 — —
0.6 0.5 -- 11
3-6 99.9 11
5.4 99-9 — — — - 1 1
7.8 99-9 0.5 3500 12.3 1 1 1
1 1
1 1
— -11
8.321 2
— - 2 1
8.8 2 1 1
— - 1 1
2 2
2 2
1 2 2
1 2 2
1 2 2
1 2 2
1 2 2
1 2 2
1 2 2
1 2 2
1 2 2
1 2 2
1 2 2
1 2 2
1 2 2
1 2 2
1 2 2
1 2 2
1 2 2
1 2 2
1 2 2
1 2 2
1 2 2
1 2 2
3.8 2 1 2 1
j.4 2 1 1 2
.3. 2 1 1 2
3.8 2 1 1 2
A-ll
-------
A-12
-------
APPENDIX B
-------
„ u PHASE 1 - LISTING OF TEST VEHICLE USE AND MAINTENANCE DATA
APPENDIX B PHAbu A
Legend
VEH _ Vehicle Number
YR - Model Year
HAKE - Vehicle Make
MODL - Vehicle Model
VIN - Vehicle Identification Number
ODOM - True Mileage
PRDATE - Purchase Date of Vehicle (1: 0-3 mos; 2: 3-12 mos; 3: 1-2 yrs;
4: over 2 yrs ago)
N - Purchased New or Used (1: New; 2: Used)
VKT - Yearly Vehicle Miles Traveled (1: 0-5000; 2: 5001-10,000;
3: 10,001-15,000; 4: 15,001-20,000; 5: 20,001-30,000;
6: over 30,000)
C - Downtown Driving (1: all; 2: most; 3: some; 4: none)
S - Suburban Driving (1: all 2: most; 3: some; 4: none)
F - Expressway Driving (1: all; 2: most; 3: some; 4: none)
W - Driving To and From Work (1: all; 2: most; 3: some; 4: none)
G - Shopping (1: all; 2: most; 3: some; 4: none)
B - Business Not To and From Work (1: all; 2: most; 3: some;
A: none)
V - T
Travel, Vacation, etc. (1: all; 2: most; 3: some; 4: none)
RREC - Vehicle Maintained to Manufacturer's Recommended Specifications
(1: Yes 2: No; 3: don't know)
Date of Last Oil Change (1: 0-6mos; 2: 6-12 mos; 3: over 1 yr;
*: don't know)
Last Tune Up (1: 0-6 mos; 2: 6-12 mos; 3: over 1 yr;
4: don't know)
Wh
no performed tune up (1: dealer; 2: independent garage;
•»' tune up clinic; 4: owner or friend; 5: don't know)
B-l
-------
MOD - Altered Engine and/or Exhaust Components (1: Yes;
2: No; 3: don't know)
OPER - Vehicle Operated 50% of the Time on Unpaved Roads, in
Competative events, or in Hauling or Transporting Loads
Heavier than for which it was designed. (1: Yes; 2: No; 3: don't
D - Has Vehicle ever had Major Damage to: a) cooling system;
b) engine; c) fuel tank; d) exhaust system; e) no damage.
(1: Yes; 2: No; 3: don't know)
LEAD - If Unleaded fuel is Required, has Vehicle been operated on
Leaded Fuel? 1: not required; 2: never; 3: once or twice;
4: occasionally; 5: regularly; 6: don't know)
H2S - Have You or Others Noticed a Hydrogen Sulfide (rotten eggs)
Odor in this Vehicle's Exhaust? (1: never; 2: rarely;
3: occasionally; 4: regularly; 5: don't know)
P - Pass or Fail FAILURE BASED ON THE FOLLOWING
MODEL YEAR HC CO
1975-1976 >250 >2.0
1972-1974 >400 >5.5
Transmission in Neutral (1: Pass; 2: Fail CO only; 3: Fail CO
only; 4: Fail Both; 0: Not maintenance Vehicle)
B-2
-------
APPENDIX B
LISTING OF PHASE I TEST VEHICLE USE AND MAINTENANCE DATA
VIN
-j .; HAKE MODL »*«_
•::—• r«rTmJC~CGV155U178371
•;•:; CHEV ijuj: rru14-5j 149726
•-,q 75 FORD TRUC
;J2 75 BUIC
:R iiif
E04HHX27231
E04HHW96197
TCY145Z506584
A5A087A282211
4H57H5Z103493
Sig SSi
CADI ELDO
CHEV VEGA
CHEV NOVA
HU3 I w ./** * * * '~ *
6L47S5Q226743
1V11A5U210378
CHEV IHPA
•/i 75 CHEV STAW
< 5CHRYNEVP
'•"•'• 75 DODG COSO
'•%% DODG DART
1L45U5J170719
WHMG5A1 32988
LH41C5B260700
02,75 FORD MUST 5R02Y 150760
75 FORD TORI 5H31H1 14213
027 75 FORD GRAN 5W81L223321
:;! 75 FORD LTD 5P68H 126623
T- 75 FORD LTD 5P64S109291
;•: 75 MERC HARQ 5263S544182
:*>• 75 M£8C HONG 5H04H527212
J32 75 OLDS DELT 3N39K5X105419
><-• 75 OLDS CUTL 3J57K5B109641
X'* 75 OLDS DELT 3L69T5X 102778
•Jj: 75 PUM FURY RL41G5A1 74430
536 75 PLYH DUST VH29C5G 108272
037 75 PONT CATA 2L69R5X155551
058 75 PONT LEHA 2F37M5A 128869
039 75 PONT GRNV 2R67W5P125211
•MO 76 C»PR SEDA GAECHU59125
:-i 75 DATS B210 HLB210570521
:~2 75 BOND SEDA SBA3306281
'•-') 75 TOYO CORO RT105005050
:•- 75 VOLK SEDA 1152036764
•-? « !2!£ S™ 3353128420
o. 75 AMMO GREM A5D465E200759
& II £i£° HORN A5A087H182275
'a 75 AHHO HATA A5A167N107515
^7l«!iS 15™ 4S07C5Z114056
• II 2,HJ£ SKn- 4B27F5L108394
2 ?t mrr ?S£ 4J57J521063*8
W 75 BUIC STAH 4F45J5Z103183
% cm, S JV77B5U215584
- " gSi? 8Sg iMHi7iig^??3
" CHEV NOVA ]f 17D5K100879
CHEV NOVA 1X6|!liicn^5§§
JD29H5R483918
1D37H5Z418938
N69U5J161283
U-35U5S105181
igsi^i
IHtllSffiiftr
?-2 75 CHEV MAI T
iisli!l!iw?«5
1811
J558
PSinsL,
"""'•siStigfii^s
75
Ltn «^H134432
hi? 5P6Ssi3C3fif
ODOM PRDATE N
16643
16277
36116
4918
16883
5299
10678
7436
11837
14907
8197
18097
14994
6238
5835
11211
8167
16580
6800
8042
17080
17184
13415
9758
2495
26502
1182
38926
28260
16271
18155
11892
4634
18398
1230
4667
6677
10738
28085
524
14424
8201
11976
34483
5A10371?
16762
13116
5004
14546
14056
16902
28568
16254
VMT
4
DENVER
C S F W G B V MFRREC LOC
LTU W MOD OPER
LEAD H2S
2332442
1112342
11242
24242
\\
244
333333
414224
4 2
4242
1444
3244244
3323424
1444414
3323434
4234122
4232444
2332343 1
3232332 2
3232343 1
4244424 1
3332343 1
3232243 1
4242243 1
3222243 3
4232344 1
4241144 1
3322344 1
1231244 1
4244243 1
3234244 1
1111141 1
3332343 1
3322333 1
3 3 3 3 3 4 a 1
3111143 1
3234243 1
3331323 1
1441 14
2442444 1
4242444 1
1114441 1
3333343 1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
4
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
4
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
4
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1 1 2
2 1 2
4 5 2
1 2 2
4 5
2 4
1 1
2 1
1 1
1 1
1 i
1 1 2
1 2 2
452
2 1 2
3 1 2
1 1 2
452
3 1 2
3 5 2
452
1 1 2
1 1 2
2 1 3
1 5 2
1 1 2
1 1 2
1 1 2
1 1 2
2 1 2
2 1 2
1 1 2
2 1 2
452
1 1 2
2 1 2
1 1 2
452
252
4 1 2
1 2 2
1 5 2
1 1 2
1 1 2
1 4 2
5 2
1 2
1 5 2
1 1 2
452
452
1 4 2
4 1 2
2
2
2
2
2
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
22221
22221
22221
21222
22221
22221
22221
22221
22221
22221
22221
22221
22221
22221
22221
22221
222i '
22221
22221
22221
22221
22221
22221
22221
22221
22221
22221
22221
22221
22221
22221
22221
22221
22221
22221
22221
22221
12222
22221
22221
22221
22221
22221
22122
22221
22221
22221
22221
22221
22221
22221
22221
22221
22221
22212
22221
22221
22221
22221
22221
22221
22221
22221
22221
22221
22221
22221
22221
22221
22221
22221
22221
22221
22221
22221
22221
22221
21222
22221
22221
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
5
2
2
2
2
2
2
5
2
2
2
2
2
1
2
5
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
5
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
5
2
2
2
2
3
3
4
H
1
3
ti
1
1
D
4
4
3
^
2
1
1
3
4
4
1
1
5
1
3
1
5
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
5
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
5
3
\
1
1
1
3
1
1
1
1
4
1
3
1
2
3
4
5
1
3
1
1
3
1
3
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
1
2
1
4
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
4
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
4
1
1
1
1
1
t
T
1
1
1
1
2
1
2
1
1
1
3
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
l
-
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
2
4
1
1
2
1
2
2
1
1
4
1
2
B-3
-------
APPENDIX B CONT'D
LISTING OF PHASE I TEST VEHICLE USE AND MAINTENANCE DATA
DENVER
VEH YR MAKE MODL
VIN
294 75 LINC CONT 5Y81A841915
295 75 MERC MONA 5W38F514.954
297 75 MERC MONT 5H07H506935
298 75 MERC COUG 5A93H549048
300 75 OLDS OMEG 3B69F5L104440
308 75 PLYM SCAM VH23G5B10 744
311 75 PLYM FURY BP23K56 01109
312 75 PLYM FURY PP29M5D119448
ODOM PRDATE N VMT c s pjfjf j_^f]jK__Loc__LTtM|_»Dj>pER___D LEAD "23
"23574"
m
20072
28506
321 75 PONT GRNV 2R19W5X147917
322 75 AUDI FOX 849000770
323 76 CAPR GHIA GAECRS09103
325 75 COLT SEDA 6P23U57000594
326 75 DATS 710 JHL710017937
327 75 DATS B210 HLB210517838
§26 75 DATS SEDA JHL710013413
329 75 FIAT STAW 128AF11904890
330 75 FIAT X1-9 128AS0028865
331 75 BOND CVCC SGC1017540
332 75 MAZD RX3 SS124W165664
333 75 MAZD RX3 SS124A1737109
335 75 MG MGB GHN5UF376920
336 75 OPEL STAW OL15N55117621
338 75 PORS 911S 9115200123
340 75 TOYO CELI RA22043075
341 75 TOYO CORO TE37524248
342 75 VOLK SEDA 1352139367
343 75 VOLK RABB 1753102394
315 75 VOLV SEDA VC24415B10457
511 75 FORD GRAN 5W81T232304
512 75 MERC MONA 5W34L5134""
513 75 OLDS OMEG 3B69D5L10
511 75 PLYM GRNF PH16H5D181229
515 75 PONT VENT 2Y17D5L113801
516 75 BMW SEDA 2360973
517 75 BMW 5301 5000585
518 75 SUBA STAW A61L802362
519 75 MERE 450S 1160321203811
520 75 PORS 914 4752901526
521 75 SAAB 99LE 99757002665
522 75 AMMO HORN A5A067E113112
523 75 AMMO HORN A5A087A111992
52* 7.5 P.ODG NONA DP41T5D144795
046*
18181
5702
10960
11321
4068
8289
6315
2466
2028
62
75 MERC MARQ 5Z62A557603
71 AMMO HORN A1C037H119130
017 71 BUIC RIVI 4Y87U4H440570
048 74 BUIC CENT 1H57J1Z106693
019 71 CHEV VEGA 1V77A1U109416
050 74 CHEV MONT 1H57H1R136097
051 71 CHEV NOVA 1Y27D4L170115
052 74 CHEV CAMA 1S87H4N193612
053 74 CHEV CHEL 1C29H1H135307
054 74 CHEV CAPR 1N35U4S133511
055 74 DODG CHAR WH23G4G216587
056 74 DODG DART LH41C4H291T
057 74 FORD PINT 4X10X26363
058 74 FORD HAVE 1K92F1117E
059 74 FORD HAVE 4K92L102811
060 74 FORD LTD 1G63S100358
061 74 FORD LTD 1P62S122020
062 71 LINC CONT 1Y82A878035
MONT 1H01F577005
-H7KJJR10094S
>7K4M351966
11 2LPJ -
ZS SLDS D1LT
71 OLDS 98 3X39T4M317329
067 74 PLYM SATE KH23G4G181375
8812 33 S8 ffiiMWB
070 74 PONT LEMA
ffl 1!
DATS 610
. . MAZD RX3
74 TOYO CELI
- VOLK SEDA
4702
7225
21057
27376
4774
8571
15635
15464
13620
21048
13068
5794
15555
13534
29786
30352
27518
16517
12172
12823
16211
23370
,
17253
26295
075 7
101 73 AMMO HORN A
102 73 BUIC ELEC 1.
103 73 CADI DEVI 6D
1 Y9M SEDA 1312713951
1A087E237236
•">U3H591916
9R3Q190
824
]
2
,
3
Q
2
,
2
2
2
,
5
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
2
2
2
2
1
2
2
3
2
2
1
2
2
2
3
2
2
3
4
3
3
!{
3
4
3
3
|
1
2
1
3
2
1
\
\
3
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
2
2
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
2
I m<\j<\
I
3
4
1
2
3
5
5
2
2
1
3
3
2
I
3
0
a
3
3
4
2
o
4
1
2
2
1
5
2
2
1
3
I
4
1
2
5
2
3
2
2
2
4
2
2
1
2
1
2
2
2
2
3
1
4
2
2
3
4
3332343
4242444
4141144
3333333
3334411
3231211
3233232
3 2 3 3 3 4 2
4424414
2232244
3334121
3231112
3232121
3334141
2231444
3232343
3232423
4232443
3222344
4122444
3221242
4233334
3332343
3321131
3331313
3333313
1132313
3332312
3212331
3322343
2332243
3323442
ij Q 3 2 4 3 3
3334323
2442444
3232433
mmi
* u i M *
3232113
3333143
2233243
3242314
3222333
2332243
2312323
3322333
2332333
3232333
3231444
4234142
3234233
|323332
2 1 1 2 I 3 3
3233254
3114144
3 2 1 I H 1
3233213
3234343
4341344
3331111
3134233
3232333
3242343
3233322
3231333
2114322
2333324
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
3
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
f
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
4
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
4
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
4
1
1
1
1
1
4
1
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
4
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
4
1
1
1
1
2
4
3
4
1
4
1
1
1
2
1
1
4
1
1
1
1
1
1
i
i
4
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
ij
3
2
2
2
1
j
2
1
2
2
4
1
I
2
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
2
1
3
5
1
1
2
1
1
5
5
5
1
5
1
1
4
1
1
1
5
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
5
5
5
1
2
1
1
4
1
1
1
5
3
^
3
2
1
1
4
2
.,
o
?
1
1
1
2
1
5
1
2
41
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
2
2
2
3
2
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
2
2
2
2
22221
22221
22221
22221
22221
22221
22221
22221
22221
22221
22221
22221
22221
22221
22221
22221
22221
22221
22221
22221
22221
22221
22221
22221
22221
22221
22221
22221
22221
21112
22221
22221
22221
22221
22221
22221
22221
22221
22221
22221
22221
22221
22221
22221
22221
22221
22221
22221
22221
22221
22221
22221
22212
22221
22221
12222
22221
22221
22221
22221
22221
22221
22221
22221
22221
22221
22221
22221
22221
22221
22221
22221
22221
22221
22221
22221
22221
22221
22221
22221
2
2
2
2
2
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
2
5
1
2
1
1
1
\
1
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
2
1
1
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
3
1
1
2
1
i
1
6
1
1
1
4
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
5
^
i)
1
4
2
4
2
1
1
\
1
1
1
1
1
3
\
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
4
4
3
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
5
3
\
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
3
3
1
1
1
i
1
1
1
3
B-4
-------
APPENDIX B CONT'D
LISTING OF PHASE I TEST VEHICLE USE AND MAINTENANCE DATA
i IB HAB
i CHEV YKo;
J057 CHEVH&I
1067;
linraas'lfllji
1L69H3J211583
)H3C226774
*M'
CHEY NOVA
CHEV IHPA
III!
115 7; FORD TORI
f 71 FORD HAVE
1 75 FORD CUST
i]$ 75 FORD LTD
116 73 HBRC HONR
N973
1207:
121 7:
1227:
1237:
88 ggZ Si
PONT LEHA 2D37Mzi27322
DATS TRUC PL620139758
OPEL HANT OL77H
VOLK SBDA
9861351
S^B^MS^
M®mw@®ffi
080 72 CHEV HALI 1D37H2K981478
081 72 CHEV CHEL 1D37H2L503069
082 72 CHEV NOVA 1X27F2L104005
083 72 CHEV IHPA 1M47H2C178595
084 72 CHEV BELA 1L69R2C196958
085 72 DODG CORO WH41G26133548
086 72 FORD PINT 2R10X189043
087 72 FORD GRNT 2A30H335207
088 72 FORD HAVE 2K92T194022
089 72 FORD GALA 2J56H162135
090 72 FORD STAW 2P74S152909
091 72 MERC HONG 2H10S622025
092 72 OLDS COTL 3G87H2M151202
093 72 PLTH VALI VL41C2R193
09J 72 PLIH FUHI PH43K2D26C __
095 72 PONT CATA 2L57H2C306772
: POUT
i 72 TOIO CORO 51850671
»i) 72 VOU KAHH 14226921 _
'00 72 VOU KOMB 2322140279
ODOM PRDATE N VMT
39866
22591
10310
40771
53558
25423
12743
22707
32527
55949
24854
52391
48244
20509
6112
37657
34
19
DENVER
C S f W G
B V MFRREC LOC LTD W MOD OPER
LEAD H2S
4
4
n
4
4
4
3
Q
4
I
4
3
4
4
4
4
3
Q
1
4
4
4
4
4
3
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
3
4
2
1
1
2
1
1
2
1
2
1
2
2
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
2
1
2
2
1
1
4
1
1
3
3
5
Q
2
1
2
I
2
1
1
2
3
1
1
2
4
2
3
1
4
1
4
3
|
1
2
2
1
1
2
1
2
2
5
1
3
2
3
111
3 2 :
3 2 \
3 3 :
3 2 i
3 2 j
3 3 :
1 2 =
3 2 ':
2 3 j
33"
3 3 :
3 2 :
3 2
3 2
1 4 I
4 2 •
3 2 •
3 2 !
lj;
1 2 ;
1 2 ?
3 2 3
2 3 3
4 1 1
JH
§ 2 •
|ij
323
3 2 I
HMi
41444
33243
23243
33133
33333
22333
54213
52333
52344
53333
52313
)4233
4144
j 4 2 4 3
52313
» 4 1 4 4
| 4 2 3 3
52343
1 3 * 3 3
! 2 2 4 3
1 2 3 4 3
14144
12313
14144
13333
12343
IHH
14243
12314
1 2 2 4 J
14144
11113
I 2 3 1 3
i 1 1 1 4
13243
12343
12423
11343
I 4 1 4 1
I 4 J 4 3
12333
3
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
2
3
3
1
2
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
3
\
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
4
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
?
3
1
1
3
1
2
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
2
3
4
4
2
2
2
4
1
2
1
2
2
1)
2
1
1
1
2
3
1
2
2
2
?
1
2
1
1
2
2
1
2
4
3
2
1
2
2
2
4
2
1
4
2
1
5
4
1
4
5
4
2
1
4
2
2
1
2
2
4
1
5
|
2
4
2
?
4
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
2
2
2
2
2
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
2
2
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
22221
22221
22221
22221
22221
22221
22221
22221
22221
22221
22221
22221
22221
22221
22221
22221
22221
22221
22221
22221
22212
22221
22221
22221
22221
22221
22221
22221
22221
22221
22221
22221
22221
22221
22221
22221
22221
22221
22221
22221
22221
22221
22221
22221
22221
22221
22221
22221
1
1
5
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
3
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
5
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
1
2
4
2
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
3
2
2
1
1
4
1
1
1
2
1
4
1
4
1
4
1
1
1
1
1
2
4
2
1
4
1
1
3222342
1 2 2
22221 1
B-5
-------
APPENDIX B - PHASE II - LISTING OF TEST VEHICLE USE AND MAINTENANCE DATA
Legend
VEH - Vehicle Number
YR - Model Year
MAKE - Vehicle Make
MODL - Vehicle Model
VIN - Vehicle Identification Number
ODOM - True Mileage
P - Pass or Fail FAILURE BASED ON THE FOLLOWING
MODEL YEAR HC CO
1975-1976 >250 >2.0
1972-1974 >400 >5.5
Transmission in Neutral (1: Pass; 2: Fail CO only; 3: Fail HC onlr
4: Fail Both)
N - Purchased New or Used (1: New; 2: Used)
Y - Yearly Vehicle Miles Traveled (1: 0-5,000; 2: 5,001-10,000;
3: 10,001-15,000; 4: 15,001-20,000; 5: 20,001-30,000;
6: over 30,000)
MD - Altered Engine and/or Exhaust Components (1: Yes; 2: No; 3: don'tfa
C - Major City Street Driving (1: all; 2: most; 3: some; 4: little/now)
S - Rural Road Driving (1: all; 2: most; 3: some; 4: little/none)
E - Rural Expressway Driving (1: all; 2: most; 3: some; 4: little/none)
W - Driving To and From Work (1: all; 2: most; 3: some; 4: little/"*)
G - Shopping (1: all; 2: most; 3: some; 4: little/none)
B - Business Not To and From Work (1: all; 2: most; 3: some;
4: little/none)
V - Social, Vacation, etc. (1: all; 2: moat; 3: some; 4: little/^)
TD - Number of Trips Made On A Typical Day (One Trip is Defied tf ,
Starting the Engin., Traveling Some Distance and Stopping the
«T - Number of Wide Open Throttle Accelerations Used Per Week
Pn ?peratad 50* of the Time on Unpaved Roads, in
Competativ* Events, or in Hauling or Transporting Loads
Heavier than for which it was Designed. (1: Yes; 2: No;
•J. don't know)
B-6
-------
H - Hard Starting (1: Yes; 2: No)
ST . Stalling (l: Yes; 2: No)
R . Rough Idle (1: Yes; 2: No)
M . Engine Misfiring (1: Yes; 2: No)
A - Poor Acceleration (1: Yes; 2: No)
SB - Engine Performance Problem - Stumbling (1: Yes; 2: No)
DS - Engine Performance Problem - Dieseling (1: Yes; 2: No)
D - Has Vehicle ever had Major Damage to: a) engine;
b) cooling system; c) fuel tank; d) exhaust system; e) no damage.
(1: Yes; 2: No; 3: don't know)
LO - Date of Last Oil Change (1: 0-6 mos; 2: 6-12 mos; 3: over 1 yr;
4: don't know)
LT - Last Tune Up (1: 0-6 mos; 2: 6-12 mos; 3: over 1 yr;
4: don't know)
MAR - Vehicle Maintained to Manufacturer's Recommended Specifications
(1: Yes; 2: No; 3: don't know)
NW - Number of Warranty Repairs
PP - Was Vehicle Returned For Performance Problems (1: No Warranty;
2: Never Returned; 3: Yes; 4: No)
UL - Unleaded Fuel Required (1: Yes; 2: No)
^ - Number of Times Leaded Fuel Was Used (1: Not Required; 2: Never;
3: Seldom; 4: Occasionally; 5: Frequently; 6: don't know)
H2 - Have You or Others Noticed a Hydrogen Sulfide (rotten eggs) Odor
in this Vehicle's Exhaust? (1: never; 2: rarely; 3: occasionally;
4: regularly; 5: don't know)
B-7
-------
APPENDIX B CONT'D
LISTING OF PHASE II TEST VEHICLE USE AND MAINTENANCE DATA
DENVER
VEH YR MAKE MODL VIN ODOM P N Y MD C S E W G_B V TD_WT_U_H_ST_R_M_A_SB_DS___D___LO LT MAR »W PP ft t M
-----------ZZ 52Zrrra~r~r4T"4 11120 422 2221 2 2 22221 3 T ~~\ r~;~7"r~
241 76 CADI SEVI
242 75 CADI DEVI
213 75 CADI FLEE
255 75 CHEV MALI
255 75 CHEV STAW
256 75 CHEV MONT
257 75 CHEV MONT
258 75 CHEV CAPR
259 75 CHEV IMPA
260 75 CHEV IMPA
261 75 CHEV IMPA
262 75 CHEV IMPA
>S69H6Q502390
6D47S5Q256631
6B69S5Q123600
1D37H5M03582
1G35H5Z464707
1H5705R159253
1H57U5Z422702
1N69H5J121426
1L69H5J211904
1L47H5J150398
1L69H5J172367
1L47H5J192803
75 CHEV CAPR 1N45Y5J20007
75 CHR\ IMPE YM43T5C10212
FORD PINT 5X11Y13il
FORD TORI 5H31H122!
33130103
1 75 OLDS COTL 3J57K5R105677
288 75 FORD TORI 5H31H153070
291 75 FORD LTD 5P7.6S11658;
292 7.5 FORD LTD
302 75 OLDS CUTL 3H45K5R136583
303 75 OLDS STAW 3H45K5R115453
304 75 OLDS COTL 3K57T5R124936
305 75 OLDS STAW 3H35T5X112754
306 75 OLDS DELT 3R15T5X116656
307 75 PLYM DOST VL29C5B25J618
309 75 PLYM VALI VP41G5B106813
310 75 PLYM FURS HH41G5A190353
316 75 PONT LEMA 2G37M5P217119
317 75 PONT VENT 2Y27H5L105552
319 75 PONT CATA 2L69H5X153789
339 75 TOYO CORO RT115001759
344 75 VOLK RABB 1753141155
534 75 AMMO GREM A5E465E165204
535 76 AMMO HORN AGA087E22535B
536 75 AMMO PACE A5A667A279082
537 75 AMMO HORN A5A087A282224
538 75 AMMO HORN A5A087E179606
539 75 AMMO HORN A5A087A292343
540 75 AMMO PACE A5C667A2B2859
541 75 AMMO MATA A5A857H198565
542 75 BOIC SKYL 4B17F5L101980
543 75 BOIC REGA 4J57J52109844
544 75 BOIC LESA 4P39J5X110095
545 75 BOIC LESA 4P39J5X147536
546 75 BOIC REGA 1J29J5Z120291
547 75 BOIC REGA 1J57J5Z109192
546 75 BOIC LESA 4P57J5X119696
549 75 BOIC LESA 4P57J5X113620
550 75 BOIC LESA 4P39J5X120089
551 75 BUIC LESA 4P57T5X 1600S
552 75 BOIC RIVI 4Z87T5B453228
-53 75 BOIC RIVI 4Z87T5H422684
555 75 BUIC STAW 4R45T5X1192§4
75 CADI ELDO 6L47S5Q207398
75 CADI DEVI 6D49S5Q2581
88 S3
gjEi m k
CADI CALA 6C47S
CJP1 sm 6S69R6Q520
CHSV MONZ 1R07B5ll5
244536
5207TO
3 75 CHSV MONZ 1R07B5ll539iq
5 75 CHEV VEGA m7B5C12?8lf
75 CHEV VEGA
75 CHEV MONZ
567 75 CHEV VEGA
568 75 CHEV VEGA
1V15B5U184790
1M27B5C213709
1V77B5U1
1V77B5C1
CHEV VEGA
CHBV MONZ
5 CHEV MONZ iR67G5Zl6(
1VnB2U2008p5
573 75 CHEV NOVA 1X69D5L115653
571 75 CHBV CAM* 1Q87L5N53677T
1X69D5L1S3940
1X27G5L142910
571 75 CHBV CAMA
575 75 CHEV NOVA
75 CHBV NOVA
577 75 CHEV NOVA
576 75 CHEV HO»Z
579 75 CHBV MONZ
580 75 CHBV NOVA
'G5K117095
'G5C204191
•C5Z100934
H5E101751
20 422 2221
4 122 2222
20 122 2122
3 1 122 2222
122 2222
422 2121
122 2222
122 2222
1132 244
1122 3*1
10679 1122 111
7751 41122
1221
2222
2222
22 2222
11600 1122
46070 2 1
22170 2 1
35047 4152
122 2222
122 2222
122 2222
121 2222
27462 1132
20717 1152
24152 1132
41037 1152
4 222 2222
10 422 2222
4 222 2221
2 122 2222
13151 2122 244
27803 1142 23
625 1142 34
5610 1222 3 "•
343424
432434
244424
344424
2222
2222
2222
2222
17511 1132
14370 4132
8126 1122
26656 1232
24424
2442
2432
3443
22858 1142
16833 4142
2221
2212
2222
2222
2222
2222
2222
2222
18465 1132
17069 2132
96 2122
1617 2142
2222
2222
2222
2122
11450 1132
21463 2132
10215 1132
7820 2122
42313 2
443342 2
441344 5
434243 2
2222
2221
2222
2222
10590 1222 311234
12386 1122 343234
13128 1222 444414
35586 2152 333311
2222
2222
2222
2222
10131 1121
21326 1122
20612 2142
12781 1132
2221
2222
2222
2222
14327 2122
31623 2152
13691 2122
16572 11
21423
4114
44144
344332
2222
2222
1222
1122
1222
2221
2222
2222
2222
2222
2222
11771 4122
1338 1132
U 1 2 2
6173 4112
2442
2444
2444
3434
1444144
2431344
45234
3 3 3 3 2 16
6857 1122
17350 1132
22760 1 1 3 2
16140 112
2 2
2 2
2 2
2 2
2 2
2 2
2 2
2 2
2 2
2 2
2 2
2 2
2 Z
2 2
2 2
2 2
2
2
Z
Z
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
7612 1132
9550 1122
15272 1122
12352 4122
2222
2222
2222
2222
22221
22221
22221
22221
22221
22221
22221
22221
22221
22221
22221
22122
22221
22221
22221
22221
2 2 22221
2 2 22221
2 2 22221
2 2 22221
2 22221
2 22221
2 22221
2 22221
2 22221
2 22221
2 22221
2 22221
2 22221
2 22221
2 22221
2 22221
2 22221
2 22221
2 22221
2 22221
2 2 22221
2 2 22221
2 2 22221
2 2 22221
2 2 22221
2 2 22221
2 2 22221
2 2 22221
2 2 22221
2 2 22221
2 2 22221
2 2 22221
2 2 22221
2 2 22221
2 2 22221
2 2 22221
2 1 22222
2 2 22221
2 2 22221
2 1 22221
2 22221
2 22221
2 2 22221
2 2 22221
2 2 22221
2 2 22221
2 2 22221
2 2 22221
2 2 22221
2 2 22221
2 1 22221
1 1 22221
2 2 22221
2 2 21222
2 1 22221
2 2 22221
2 2 22221
2 2 22221
2 2 22221
2 2 22221
2 2 22221
2 2 22221
5 3
3 1
5 1
3 1
1 i
2 1
1 1
I \
Z 1
3 1
3 1
4 2
3 1
1 1
3 1
6 1
III
III
\ 3 1
§52
1 1 1
\ \ I
5 1 2
3 1 4
5 Z 4
5 1 5
4 4
4 1
1 2
ill
12 i
1 2 3
1 2 5
1 2 f
1 2 4
1 2
1 3
1 2
1 2
31 2212
3] 5412
I 3*12
31 2212
* ' 2212
31 4412
53 3412
41 4312
64 6412
11 3312
51 3312
31 1112
51 5312
31 5312
41 5212
31 2212
31 4412
51 2212
51 4412
31 5421
31 5412
31 S412
63 6221
41 5312
31 5312
31 5312
31 3312
11 5412
12
B-8
-------
APPENDIX B CONT'D
LISTING OF PHASE II TEST VEHICLE USE AND MAINTENANCE DATA
DENVER
.„. unnL VIN
vo MAKK MUW-1
• •-L' Jfl Hft"* __ — — -•—•"-••
:::'-T5S'w!"!K3!it!olle
HsgSilSii?
• - - aii75C
- /'ucu NOVA 1Y 17L5L. 1 p^3f 5
' ^ 7-i CHM n1-""* .vtnncr 1U^xUn
i.i 33 feint
'Musffiiiliip
, -r- /"UPV MONT 1H57n!>tM i i ypy
] ?i CHEV MONT 1H57H5Z407346
in37H5ZinOMOO
^ ?c rHFV MONT 1H57H5KM08611
- /5 '-"s, IT* IT iroQHRRliUTQUQ
• "IS '"HEV MALI iLt yn^n**** f j?"* 7
r "?" frEV STAW ID _)_*"-"*•' '
0 . j ^.i'^' w-
Sfiiiilill
j 75 CHEV MALI 1D37H5Z407944
1 75 CHEV STAW 1C35H5Z451421
76 CHEV CAMA 1SB7L6N555251
\ 76 CHEV MALI 1DJ7Q6Z452294
i 75 CHEV STAW 1L35U5J 124704
5 75 CHEV IHPA 1L35U5J 12541 1
I 75 CHEV STAW 1L45U5S1 48026
77 CHEV IMPA 1L69U5S1 3,8433
: 75 CHEV CAPR 1N45Y5J 180373
i 75 CHRY CORD SS22K4R 165983
0 75 CHRY CORD SS22K5R1 10216
1 75 CHRY NEWP CL23H5C124150
2 75 CHRY CORD SS22K5R1 54643
n 75 CHRY NEWP CM41M5C101244
14 75 CHRY NEWY CS23T5C1 24789
15 75 CHRY NEWY CS43T5C1 64575
516 75 DODG DART LL29C5G151572
617 76 DODG DART LL29C6G141564
W 75 DODG DART LP23G5G1 12326
19 75 DODG DART LP41G5F1 69939
20 '5 DODG CHAR XS22G5R1 03020
21 75 DODG CHAR XS22K5R150787
A 75 OODG CHAR XS22N5R1 33046
y 75 DODGMONA DH23M5D137185
i- ": FORD PINT 5X12Y221097
II ?5 FORD PINT 5X12Y190024
26 73 FORD PINT 5X11Y160132
^HMn^S
!!i|B885ir,gliS8!5
i^RBSffiiilrf
iSffigBSTOra?
^ SB S5 i?iilOT
liyiiil
'• '5 FORD BRM 5&82?i§§5«
^ 75 FORD GRAN SUftiPioc,or
- 75 FORD OBiu zXo1'1 95285
;1 75 Foim rSvS 5W82F122411
;2 75 DnS; ""AN 5U8?Pi7Ri44
'j FORn Tftnr -'"ucr i fol i2
tunu IQRI 5H42H1 1173Q
JH1«$ SB? issues
-? 75 FORD irrl ?S?1S166217
:!*^<e?5
ODOM
"9024
22831
10970
14074
27685
10841
8197
19662
5953
14642
1 1721
13512
15862
11415
35554
21799
11
'.Si
3359
53357
13319
19096
19999
24228
17681
22035
36886
29284
9895
16136
7370
22623
2589
14052
17066
10001
19782
23476
16648
10151
21115
11229
9889
32942
7450
3300
10286
6379
13746
19804
10284
17996
23718
51246
m32
2 T
321
16198
15438
4005
28804
8225
19541
16250
9914
11666
16Q50
31001
16588
36565
20987
19867
2440
308Q5
11569
48361
P N Y MD
~4~7~2~2~
2132
4132
1132
1152
1122
1122
4132
4112
1122
4112
2122
4122
2232
2152
2142
1152
4152
4162
4132
1122
1132
1122
1152
1122
1142
1142
3133
2132
4132
4152
1252
4122
1132
2122
2242
1132
2122
1222
4122
4122
2232
4122
3112
1142
1122
1122
1152
1112
1112
1132
1122
1132
1132
1122
1122
1132
1152
1142
1132
1122
1222
1112
1142
1122
1132
1132
2122
1122
1132
1142
2132
3152
2232
2132
1132
1252
1132
1152
C S E W
~2~4~4~4
2442
2442
3442
3443
2444
3333
3331
2442
2444
2441
2442
3432
3444
3443
3442
3443
1443
3434
3334
3434
3444
3443
4314
2444
3443
3443
2443
2444
2442
ills
2434
3431
3444
2433
3323
2441
2444
1443
2443
3442
2443
3334
2442
2442
2433
3332
2444
2444
3441
3442
2442
1332
2333
2334
4421
3 4. 3 4
2433
323!
1441
3444
2441
3442
3442
2332
2443
2444
2442
2443
MM
3444
3442
3334
3 4 4 4
3444
3334
G B V TD
~2~4~3™2
3435
3434
3436
4345
2434
3432
4 3 4 15
3434
243 4
3432
343 4
3432
342 1
424 8
4348
3 3 3 20
4 2 3 12
441 2
3 4 3 10
2432
1 4 4 10
4422
4146
4144
3 3 3 20
4335
4 2 3 15
3 1 4 10
343 4
3236
4 1 3 10
243 4
3436
3436
3426
3334
3 4 5 2
243 4
3434
343 1
3433
151 I
III I
243 1
3334
1434
34^4
3442
3344
J432
343 4
3332
233 1
3234
4443
243 4
3432
443 3
3432
343 3
1442
3332
3432
443 4
3436
131 \
343 3
3 2 3 15
3337
3 2 J 10
2432
343 2
3432
3438
3431
3 2 3 20
WT U H
"""2*2
422
1 2 2
1 2 1
4 2 1
1 2 2
222
422
222
2 2 1
1 2 2
3 2 2
1 2 2
1 2 2
422
422
222
1 2 2
4 1 2
4 1 1
2 1 2
422
322
2 2 1
1 2 2
4 2 1
422
1 2 2
422
1 2 1
4 2 1
4 2 1
1 2 2
2 2 1
1 2 2
3 2 2
1 2 2
422
322
1 2 2
1 2 2
3 2 2
222
222
1 1 2
1 2 2
1 2 2
422
222
1 2 2
322
422
222
422
3 2 1
222
4 2 1
422
122
422
222
1 2 1
1 2 2
1 2 1
422
4 2 1
3 2 2
1 2 2
1 2 2
1 2 1
422
1 2 2
1 2 2
3 2 1
422
222
222
222
422
ST R M A
--------
2222
1222
2122
2122
2222
2222
1222
2222
2121
2222
2222
2222
2222
2222
2222
2222
2222
1222
2122
2221
2222
2222
2222
2122
2222
2222
2121
2222
2122
2222
2222
2222
2222
2121
1222
2112
2222
2222
2222
2222
2222
2122
1222
2222
2222
2222
2222
2122
2222
2122
2222
2222
2222
2122
2122
1222
2222
2221
2222
2112
2222
2121
2222
2222
2222
2121
2222
2222
2222
1222
2222
2222
2122
1211
2122
1222
2222
2222
2122
SB
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
2
2
1
2
2
2
2
2
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
2
2
2
1
2
2
2
2
2
DS D
2~2222"
2 22221
2 22221
2 22221
2 22221
2 22221
2 22221
2 22221
2 22221
2 12222
2 22221
2 22221
2 21222
2 22221
2 22221
2 22221
~ ~.~ ','•'•
2 22221
2 22221
2 22221
2 22221
2 22221
2 22221
2 22221
2 22221
2 22221
2 22221
2 22222
2 22221
2 22221
1 22221
2 22221
2 22221
2 22221
2 22221
1 22221
2 22221
2 22221
2 22221
2 22221
2 22221
2 22221
2 22221
2 22221
2 22221
2 22221
1 22221
2 22221
2 22221
2 22221
2 22221
2 22221
2 22221
2 12222
2 22221
2 22221
2 22221
2 22221
2 22221
2 22221
2 22221
2 22221
1 22221
2 22221
2 22221
2 22221
2 22221
2 22221
2 22221
2 22221
1 22221
2 22221
2 22221
2 22221
1 22221
1 22221
2 22221
2 22221
1 22221
2 22221
LO LT
1 2
4 5
4 5
3 5
3 3
5 3
3 5
4* 5
3 ")
3 4
i i
3 5
] 1
3 6
3 1
1 1
3 4
3 3
3 3
3 3
3 n
6 5
3 3
3 3
3 5
3 ^
3 i
1 1
6 6
6 6
3 3
3 4
3 3
3 3
3 6
] 61
5 5
3 3
3 3
3 ?
1 j
2 4
•i 3
i i
] I
3 5
3 3
3 4
3 5
3 5
3 3
3 1
i i
i l
MAR
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
"
1
1
i
1
1
1
1
1
i
i
i
1
i
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
3
3
3
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
NW PP UL L H2
____________
53121
43124
54121
44121
24124
22121
44124
53124
53123
32121
22124
22121
22121
54121
22121
34124
22144
11 I 1 I
22121
53121
22124
34121
22123
22124
22161
44124
53124
33121
44123
53123
54121
22125
22121
34123
33121
43124
44121
11121
53124
22123
22122
34124
34121
33121
2.4 12 1
34123
22124
22121
32124
53132
44123
43124
22121
44123
22121
-1-1 124
22121
S 4 1 2 1
1 1 123
43121
22121
44121
54121
53123
22121
53123
53123
44121
54121
24121
54121
43121
22121
11121
53121
43123
B-9
-------
APPENDIX B CONT'D
LISTING OF PHASE II TEST VEHICLE USE AND MAINTENANCE DATA
DENVER
VEH YR MAKE MODL VIH ODOM P N Y «D C S E W G B_V TD_WT_0_H_ST_R_M_A_SB_DS___D_ _LO LT MAR HH
tsrn?^sr?^^^(\]\r\HUH \ M2 ^211 1 1 11111 i i i~~
662 75 FORD LTD. 5J»3? 3JZ5I $K* i 3 2 I 2 4 5 3 3 2 310 412 2222 2 2 21222 § 3 1
2 2 22221 3 3 1
662 75 FORD LTD 5J63S1417B5
663 75 FORD THND 5J87A125013
664 75 FORD THND 5JB7A125665
$WiiiiiUU!iiimm»jii
III }l ggg iffi iwliJi^i *m U 1 I 3 3 3 2 3 3 § § 3 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 22221 I I ,
"9 75 "ISC MONA 5W37F510916 84971112 2 4 4 4 Z j | 2 ||| |||| | 2 ||221 | ? ,
670 75 MERC COUG 5A§3H508994 17830 3| ^ S J f j H 2 322 2212 1 2 2222 1 1 i
& ?l SI^ 88 Stet 32$ 2 I J I 3 H 2 J ! 2 ! I U I I 1 2 * 1 I Hill I I }
ffl?lofgscfflSfft&ft&u illillll 1HH'* S 111 HI? I llllll U } \\\\\
I?K II oFns nSIr 3c wlLl 02327 21909 442 3335341 2 132 2221 2 2 22221 452 542?
I?! 75 OLDS CUTL $57^1 W 90?6 1122 I * < 3 < 3 4 4 1 i 2 2221 Z 2 22221 3 3 1 33121
677 75 OLDS CUTL 3J57F5H103599 10369 1122 2441444 4 222 2222 2 2 22221 331 5 jl 1 2 ,
676" 75 OLDS CUTL 3G37F5R103023 22399 142 §* f2 34 3 1 all fill I I lllli 2 \ \ 3*122
III ?755 £S SUT! m \\Hl\H \ * 3 5 2 ! 1 III I I 1 lllll | | i i $ } f j
ill ?; 83 Salt IKS Ml 111 iSHin I 111 1111 1 111111 Hi I \ \\\
Mini mmh ni mi i iiiii! l!i s s iii
685 75 OLDS CBTL 3J57K5R139844 16980 1222 1442343 4 122 2222 2 2 22221 321 11123
686 76 OLDS STAW 3,G37R6R1 §2474 13086 1 2 32 jj «3 3 8 ? 3 2 422 2222 2 2 22221 | 2 1 34121
687 75 OLDS COIL 3J57T5M259547 17478 1262 331341 4 20 421 2122 Z 2 22221 331 22123
686 75 OLDS DELT 3L39T5X100337 15455 1122 2442344 4 122 2222 2 2 22221 351 22121
689 75 PLYM DUST VL29C5B103476 12127 2122 2442333 2 122 2222 2 2 22221 451 54)21
690 75 PLYM VALI VP41C5R106808 16918 2132 333435| 2 122 1222 2 2 22221 333 53121
691 75 PLYM DUST VL29C5B132772 6873 2112 3333333 5 122 1222 2 2 22221 351 2 2 1 2 H
692 75 PLYM DUST VH29G5G107424 19941 1142 3443334 3 322 2222 2 2 22221 332 54122
693 75 PLYM FURY RH23G5G110377 26135 1132 3444342 2 222 2212 2 2 22221 341 4 3 1 2 K
694 75 PLYM FURY PH43K5D153640 23079 4 2.42 3431444 5 422 1112 2 2 22221 341 22123
695 76 PLYM STAW RL46M6A124816 22957 1152 3334423 6 422 1222 2 2 22221 331 5 4 1 3 >
696 75 PONT FIRE 2S87D5N569342 16695 4132 1441444 2 222 2222 2 1 12222 331 53123
697 75 PONT VENT 2Y69F5L108371 18J45 1132 3334343 2 222 1111 2 2 22221 3 3 1
696 75 PONT FIRE 2T&7M5N523943 - • •
2 2 22221 3 3 1
765 75 PONT CATA 2L69R5Xi3695i 21031 4i§2 SlUil"*! 4 §22 2222 I 1 22221 5 I f
^ ?1 38 C-A^A lGL|99MR55Pxl^2! ?^ ? 1 3 ' ^ " 3 4 3 3 3 2 312 1221 2 2 22221 3 5 2
!I2 Zft «?«£ 592? 5*83551
35
701 76 PONT FIRE 2U87Z6N522971 9160 3132 3441344 2 222 2222 2 2 22221 3 3 1
702 75 PONT STAW 2G35H5G108002 20200 1132 2444343 2 322 2222 2 2 2222 § 3 1
703 75 PONT GRNV 2R49S5X103335 15660 1232 443324§ 1 122 2212 2 2 22221 323
705 75 AUDI 100L 8151051625 9000 111! 3455335 2 122 2111 2 2 22221 3 3 1
705 75 DATS B210 HLB21009735 20713 2142 2443333 5 422 2222 2 2 22221 3 5 1
706 75 DATS B210 HLB210523387 18099 132 3445353 4 222 2222 2 2 2222 3 3
707 75 MG MIDG GAB6UF1552746 11000 32 3442343 1 122 1222 I 2 21222 1 2
708 75 OPEL 1900 OL11N550B9B68 5122 1 1 I 2 3443333 4 422 2222 I 2 22221 3 3 1
709 75 OPEL STAW OL15N55072000 10118 2122 2442343 3 422 2222 2 2 22221 3 3 1
710 75 TOYO STAW TE38008653 15500 1132 3434342 5 121 2222 2 2 22221 322
711 75 TOYO CORO TE38004591 3748 122 ?442?4f I \\\ f??l I 1 llfii \ \ 1
712 75 TOYO CORO RT119003055 16975 lift 1444241 2 ill 1111 1 1 Hill 1 3 1
713 75 TOYO CORO RT115001082 1537Q 213? 1 1 ? i t * i A aoo 0501 1 9 00551 3 t 1
714 75 VOLK SEDA 1152036710 25263 fill 1 4 I H 1 3 5 HI Ill2 2 I 1111 I I
WBwssMHta mlHii liHlH 1 III Ifii 1 111! i!
iu ?i Rg LTB SSJBS m ? u i u * H : i s n j f i n i i mil j ] i
CHEV MALI 1D37H4246?422 ?Htl JUS 1 3 55 I ? ! ? 2 5 2 2222 1 1 lllll 1 5 1
cHEv^fflSl? 2&§ilii iUihl S Hi 1111 1 llllll 1 1 1
!i2 }J S N^P* SSiag^Tl 5I?g? i f 5 2 3 4 4 3 3 4 3 2 422 2222 2 2 22222
|54 74 FORD ELIT 4G2 H1<*£w72 -Mil 5 ! J S 2 5 1 5 3 5 J. 1 122 2 2 2 2 2 2 22??!
I If 17 VU141
111 If S SS§§ ^a?ZIKa' U?i9 3! 2 ? 3 3 3 11 !» 3 ? 122 2221 2 2 22221 3 3 ]
!54 74 FORD ELIT 4G21H194639 ^i«i 5{i^ 3 S 1 5 3 ^ J ' 122 2222 2 2 22221
155 74 FORD LTD nSfgliglP ^111 ? 5 I 1 8 S 3 I 1 3 .? II2 2 2 2 2 2 2 22221
•• *> C. C. ^ ^ «.&.«.*- ( ^ 3 *
2222 2 2 22221 3 J 3
74 88g Hg§£ 359SKl?li8 '3?K J!! I H 3 5 i 5« 2 122 2222 2 2 22221 3 « 3
7IJ AM»n r.opu AiiD/ic?5i?^i?AS .?1?J 1112 2434243 1 150 9 •> •> o t •> 00901 5 1 1
721 74 AMW GREM A4E465B«9^1 ,*& 1 H 1 2 S \\ | « 3 1 122 2222 2 2 22221 . . -
722 74 AMMO GREM A4A4li!5i?8?3 ^ \\\\ \\\\\\\ \ \\\ \\\\ | | ||||1 | | J
81 g BTc % M 1 i 1 i 1 S S it 3 ? 3 6 3 2 2 2 | | 2 2 | 2^1 | | 1
2222 2 2 22221 3 I ]
727 74 CADI 6 •--••-..--.• jte* 2222 2 2 22221 2 2 1
728 74 CHEV VEGA 1V77A4§1?22« ulln? 1132 1431343 3 122 2222 2 2 22221 3 2 1
9n»miBKimi ifflHii HHHi \ III fill i ill I! i
B-10
-------
APPENDIX B CONT'D
LISTING OF PHASE II TEST VEHICLE USE AND MAINTENANCE DATA
DENVER
,i-j YR HAKE
vtri i" "22;
-•""ii'cHEV
'••• 74 CHEV
'-{'. 7- CHEV
• 54 74 CHEV
-:= 74 CHEV
•:2 ^4 CHEV
^7 74 CHEV
-ij 14 DODG
7 -.3 74 DODG
!;o 74 DODG
,,, 74 FORD
7.2 74 FORD
7.; 74 FORD
-.; 74 FORD
%= 74 FORD
7^ 74 FORD
7,7 74 FORD
l4 74 FORD
',« 74 FORD
"50 74 FORD
751 74 FORD
'52 74 FORD
'53 74 FORD
754 74 HERC
755 74 HERC
*ts 74 OLDS
757 74 OLDS
7;S 74 OLDS
759 74 PLYH
760 74 PLYH
761 74 PLYH
762 74 PLYH
'63 74 PLYH
76< 74 PONT
765 74 PONT
766 74 PONT
767 74 PONT
768 74 AUDI
769 74 CAPR
770 14 COLT
'71 74 DATS
772 74 DATS
77? 74 FIAT
'!•< 74 FIAT
775 74 HERB
776 74 TOYO
777 74 TOYO
778 74 VOLK
779 74 VOLK
780 74 VOLV
3^6 73 BUIC
368 73 BUIC
37' 73 CHEV
"" 7: -ORD
3" 0 FORD
1 1 §i
" 73 CAPR
?n.
§H3 AHMO
& <3 AHHO
,§3 73 AHMO
?°4 73 BUIC
III 73 BUIC
76 jj f Ic
'" 73 CADI
SQ 73 A.*
;$? 73 CADI
"3 CHEV
« il 38
illW?®
« l\ CHEV
73 CHEV
ID 7* ruD»
'j IHEV
11 H CHEV
3(J 70 ftfinn
99 ij CHEV
tnEV
HODL
"NOVA
NOVA
HONT
MALI
NOVA
NOVA
IMPA
CHAL
CHAR
DART
PINT
PINT
PINT
PINT
KUST
HAVE
HUST
HAVE
TORI
TORI
TORI
LTD
STAW
COHE
COUG
CUTL
CUTL
CUTL
DUST
DUST
DUST
FRY3
FURY
FIRE
LEMA
CATA
LEMA
100L
SPOR
SEDA
SEDA
710
128
128
280
CORO
CORO
SEDA
412
142
CENT
ELEC
HALI
PINT
LTD
THND
2000
HORN
HORN
MATA
CENT
CENT
LESA
LESA
DEVI
DEVI
VEGA
VEGA
VEGA
NOVA
NOVA
NOVA
NOVA
CAPR
CHEL
NOVA
HALI
VIN
--— -—•"~'~~7rT ,
1X27H4L17DJU i
1X27K4L1 ^' / 1«
1C35H1Z115991
1X27H1L19911S
JH23G4B1 22909
WH23G1A273H3
LH11C1R185252
1X10X288073
4X11X171510
4X12Y189503
1X12Y227104
4F02Z308366
4K91L179087
4F03Z338087
4K92F102820
4G21S193736
1G21H241208
1B38H1 15815
4E61H117297
4U76S565125
1K31T508093
4A93H531771
3J57KAM300693
3J57K4M363151
3J57K4M296252
VL29B4B372966
VL29C4G101175
VL29G4B294462
PH43K4D1 36259
PH13N1D165037
2T87M4N 132031
2F37M4Z101448
2L69R4C102583
2G37P4A138113
8041079273
GAECNK64163
6L21K15311705
HLB210038686
KJHL710012113
128A1817743
128A1773503
1140601211167
RT104002783
TE27109441
1342733692
4212030979
1126343417948
4D37H3Z107996
4V39U3H544875
1D37H37483534
3P74S 130410
GAECNB92819
A3A037E007161
A3A087H406795
A3A157A310307
1H57J3Z102237
{JP67J3X135330
1L69T3C127B50
6D49R301 30034
6D47R3Q1Q8891
1V15B3U470982
1V77B3U486507
35581
1X27F3L 156912
1Y6QHX1 1 7HI §7
1X1?P"^55
1D29H^R4Jj7CH2
f5H6
ODOM PNXMDCSEWGBVTDWTUHSTRMA
~"l8"7~i7~3 122 2443333 10 221 1122
40394 4232 1444441 6 122 2122
40961 1132 3443312 4 222 2222
25210 1132 2331213 2 222 2222
10181 1122 2114323 2 122 2222
21300 1132 3322333 1 121 2222
30331 1132 2444243 10 222 2222
37176 1132 3131343 2 122 2222
32210 1142 1333113 10 422 2222
19869 1232 2333333 5 422 2222
20995 3142 3322343 1 322 2212
11042 1112 3411113 3 122 2222
27650 2232 2132313 3 122 2222
27506 2132 3233323 2 112 2222
16321 1122 1112112 1 122 2222
8183 1112 2331212 2 122 2222
39369 1152 3443413 10 422 2222
252Q7 3122 3114343 1 122 2222
29564 1232 2111213 10 122 2222
11780 1122 2113213 2 122 2222
44050 1152 3333323 6 422 2222
44900 1142 1413433 20 222 2222
25805 3132 2443333 5 122 2122
34478 1222 2441141 3 222 2222
7559 1112 3131313 1 122 2222
10570 1232 3143343 5 222 2222
13899 2122 3332333 6 122 2222
9168 3112 2142313 2 122 2122
18312 1122 2142343 2 122 2222
31991 3132 2442444 4 222 2222
18635 4132 2442233 6 322 2222
21391 2122 3312313 2 222 2122
1089 1112 3333233 2 122 2221
25662 1232 2444343 4 121 1122
31177 2132 2444343 2 222 2222
34872 1122 2113244 2 122 2222
16995 1122 3441343 4 122 2222
31877 1142 3442343 6 222 2222
20364 1122 2443343 8 422 2222
16893 4132 2441133 5 222 2222
24857 1132 2432343 6 122 2212
27466 1132 2332343 4 122 2222
19124 1142 2442343 4 221 2222
23612 4132 2441343 4 222 2122
23743 1132 3431444 3 322 2222
231 19 3122 3441344 6 122 2222
20420 4132 1441343 5 421 2222
23803 1132 1441343 3 422 2222
28004 1132 3443334 5 421 1111
43203 2242 3323313 4 422 2222
26192 1122 2442343 2 122 2222
38333 1132 2434233 5 122 2222
30515 1232 3334343 2 122 2222
59701 2142 333333' 1 122 2222
10833 2132 2332333 1 221 2222
41000 1232 144-4142 4 122 2222
30991 2132 1442344 2 122 2222
c2?tl 1 2 3 2 2442313 4 121 1222
§&U§ } ' 2 3 "* 1 3 3 3 3. o 421 2222
38015 1132 2333332 3 122 2222
?t?,U } 2 2 2 3442333 4 122 2222
JSlS8, 2122 2132343 1 222 2222
20883 1 1 2 2 2331213 2 121 2222
11114 1112 3444344 3 122 2222
57385 1152 3322334 3 422 2222
30580 1122 2334252 2 212 2222
24943 1122 2454342 2 122 2222
31909 3222 2444243 4 222 2222
!Sa^ ,1222 2443242 2 122 1222
12I8Z 2 2 H 2 2433342 3 122 2122
2I5SP 3132 2441343 2 122 2222
46224 1152 3442343 4 422 2222
WǤ 3M2 3111311 2 121 2222
^ii2 1132 2112343 4 122 2222
3,1?31 3122 2442343 3 421 1122
48400 1142 3334212 2 212 2222
is2o? J ! 5 1 3333333 2 122 2222
nlh2.1 1132 3153433 4 221 2221
7S^55 1232 5441444 2 422 1122
12403 1212 2444244 2 122 2222
SB
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
2
2
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
DS D
2*22221
2 22221
2 22221
2 22221
2 22221
2 22221
1 22221
2 22221
2 22221
2 22221
2 22221
2 22221
2 22221
2 22221
2 22221
2 22221
2 22221
2 22221
2 22221
2 22221
2 22221
2 22221
2 22221
2 22221
2 22221
2 22221
2 22221
2 22221
2 22221
2 22221
2 22221
2 22221
2 22221
2 22221
2 22221
1 22221
2 22221
2 22221
2 22122
2 22221
2 22221
2 22221
2 22221
2 22221
2 22221
2 22221
1 22221
2 22221
2 22221
2 21222
2 22221
2 22221
2 22221
2 22221
1 22221
2 22221
2 22221
2 22221
2 22221
2 22221
1 11222
2 22221
2 22221
2 22221
2 22221
2 22221
2 22221
2 22221
2 22221
1 22221
2 22221
2 22221
2 22221
2 22221
2 22221
2 22221
1 22221
2 22221
2 22221
2 22221
LO
•q
2
3
3
3
3
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
I
3
3
3
3
3
4
5
3
2
3
3
]
3
3
,
3
I
I
3
3
]
3
\
I)
3
4
3
3
LT
•:
2
6
3
3
5
1
4
2
3
3
3
2
|
6
3
3
6
2
3
1
3
1
3
1
5
3
1
1
3
I
]
4
3
3
3
}
4
3
I
3
3
6
3
"•
6
4
3
5
MAR
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
3
1
1
1
1
3
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
3
1
1
2
1
1
1
3
I
2
1
1
1
3
1
1
1
3
1
1
1
5
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
3
2
1
I
1
1
NW
ij
1
2
5
2
2
3
5
4
3
1
5
4
4
5
5
1
3
2
2
5
2
3
4
2
4
3
3
O
5
5
3
5
5
2
2
5
2
4
2
5
3
?
3
5
5
2
1
1
2
4
I
5
2
2
5
1
1
PP UL L
2 p I
1 2 1
2 2 1
1 2 1
2 2 1
2 2 1
1 2 1
4 2 1
2 2 1
4 2 1
2 2 1
4 2 1
1 2 1
1 2 1
2 2 1
3 2 1
2 2 1
3 2 1
1 2 1
2 2 1
1 2 1
4 2 1
4 2 1
1 2 1
1 2 1
1 2 1
1 2 1
2 2 1
4 2 1
4 2 1
2 2 1
3 2 1
3 2 1
2 2 1
3 2 1
5 2 1
3 2 1
5 2 1
4 2 1
3 2 1
2 2 1
2 2 1
2 2 1
4 2 1
4 2 1
4 2 1
2 2 1
2 2 1
3 2 1
1 2 1
2 2 1
4 2 1
2 2 1
3 2 1
4 2 1
1 2 1
4 2 1
1 2 1
4 2 1
4 2 1
3 2 1
5 2 1
4 2 1
4 2 1
4 2 1
1 2 1
2 2 1
2 2 1
1 2 1
1 2 1
2 2 1
1 2 1
1 2 1
3 2 1
3 2 1
2 2 1
2 2 1
3 2 1
1 2 1
1 2 1
H2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
5
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
3
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
3
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
B-ll
-------
APPENDIX B CONT'D
LISTING OF PHASE II TEST VEHICLE USE AND MAINTENANCE DATA
DENVER
VEH 1R MAKE MODL
802
803
804
§°!
80J
80]
801
VIN
1E35K3K148819
1L39H3S107753
ODOM PNYMDCSEW_GB_V TD_^_H_«_SJ_R_M_A_SB_DS D LO LT MAR NW ft m, L ^
""•*"Trr~TT-Z~«™~^ it n >i o li 3 11 Q 9 5 9999 9 9 99991 o rs «""""-7"—-—-.
CHEV IHPA 1L47K3C10492
73 CHEV
73 CHEV
73 CHEV
7
73 CHEV MONT
II CHEV STAW iLlsxIcieoW 45540 3
809 73 CHRY NEWP
810 73 CHRY NEWY
811 73 DODG DART
812 73 DODG DART
813 73 DODG CHAR WP29P3A240724
814 73 DODG DART LH23G3B453580
815
81?
73 FORD PINT
73 FORD PINT
2142 21424
3122 24413
4122 24342
2122 14413
3X11X220113
3X12X113918
36900 4132
22108 2222
25978 1122 _
39517 1212 31
333231
214231
2143
817 73 FORD STAW 3R12X197861
818 73 FORD PINT 3X10X200039
819 73 FORD HAVE 3K91T208759
820 73 FORD HAVE 3K92L222218
821 73 FORD HAVE 3K92F208760
822 73 FORD HAVE 3K91L150748
823 73 FORD MUST 3F04F140742
824 73 FORD HAVE 3K91F205943
22
3332
2 4 4 2 _
1112 3411154
2132 §11131
29957 11
23806 1 2 3 2
12615
39210
Hill
2322
6122
2 122
3122
16112
13122
21122
31222
825 73
"26 73
-_, ., FORD HAVE 3K92L1]
826 73 FORD LTD 3J76N15
827 73 FORD LTD 3P68S102H6
828 73 FORD TORI 3H31H115311
829 73 FORD GALA 3J54S181094
30 73 LINC CONT 3Y82A807790
831 73 MERC COME
832 73 MERC MONG
K31L551139
B11H525187
33 73 MERC HONT
34 73 OLDS CUTL
35 73 OLDS CUTL 3J57K!
Z44S507959
57K3R203438
1394404
OLDS CUTL 3J57K3R100449
25107 2222 14
30594 3122 44
50742 4132 31
41503 2232 31
31171 1132
29961 2222
23632 1122
26523 2112
23500 1222
36419 1132
18122 2132
36289 1222
23913 1122
20320 1 .1 2 2
36396 2232
43328 1132
OLDS CUTL 3J29K3R1 66051 1980S
837 73
838 73 PLYM DUST VL29C5Bl5378i
839 73 PLYM DUST VL29C3B146915
840 73 PLYH DUST VL29G3B134721
841 73 PLYM SATA RH23G3G223916
812 73 PLYM SATE RH11G3A270872
843 73 PLYM FRY3 PH43K3D323266
844 73 PONT VENT 2Y27H3L122938
9808 3122
I6064 1132
I5598 2122
10951 4232
232
2212
PONT LENA 2F37M3Z1 19391
PONT LEMA 2D29M3Z1 17645
845 73
5,**' 'J »w«i* uuiixt ^Lt^jnjltl I I WT^
847 73 PONT CATA 2L69H3C120580
848 73 PONT CATA 2L69R3C103955
819 73 PONT STAW 2L3.5S3C122535
850 73 DATS B610 PL6
§51 73 DATS 210Z HLS.,,,.
852 73 HOND CIVI SBA101
15600 1
7000
20331 2122
57853 2112
502S2 3232
29586 4122
28506 1122
27600 1122
42535 2132
29300 1132
37597 2132
0633 1122
SUBA STAW E62L705719
\m
6090 4142
"PS
§ii236
390 72 BUIC SKYL 1D37H2H110817 26716 1
9 3g 1&
g 722 Rg gg
US! I! R8 8SS
101 72 FORD LTD
105 72 LINC CONT
106 72 MERC MONT
109 72 OLDS NNTY
83 ?! V® us
§65 72 AMMO GREM
866 72 AMMO HORN
2K92F187832
2J58H105734
2U6IN108479
2Y82A836268
2H03H561736
3V39T2M429716
30000 1122
82236 2232
21407 2112
50216 2132
53074 1252
17705 1122
6267B 1232
321
It 2
2142414
3411313 -
2444343 6
3331313 3
2332313 2
3111313 2
2111114 2
2144343 4
1143213 4
2 4 4 1| 2 4 2 1
1143342 2
2 4 1 T 5 1 4 -
222
222
222
1 2 2
12
22
22
22
21
22
22
11
2222
2212
2222
2222
2222
2222
2121
2222
2 22221 2
1 21222 3
2 22221 3
2 22212 3
2 22221 1
2 22221 3
2 22221 3
2 22221 3
2 22221 3
2 22221 3
2 22221 3
2 22221 3
2 22221 3
2 22221 3
2 22221 3
2 22221 3
2 22222 1
2 22221 3
2 22212 2
1 22221 1
2 22221 6
2 22221 3
2 22221 3
2 22221 3
1121 1 2 22221
2222 2 2 22221
1222 2 2 22221
2222 2 2 22221
2222 2 2 22221
1221 2 1 22221
2221 2 2 22221
2222 2 2 22221
2 1
2222
2222
2222
2222
2222
2222
2222
2122
2222
2222
2222
2111
2222
2222
2222
2222
2222
2222
2222
2222
2222
2222
2222
2222
2222
2222
2211
2222
1122
2222
2222
2222
2222
2222
2222
2222
2222
2121
2222
2222
1222
2122
2222
1111
2222
2222
2122
2222
2 2 22221
2 2 22221
2 2 22221
2 2 22221
2 2 22221
2 2 22221
2 2 22221
2 2 22222
2 2 22221
2 2 22221
2 2 22221
1 2 22221
2 2 22221
2 2 22221
2 2 22221
2 2 22221
2 2 22221
2 2 22221
2 2 22221
2 2 22221
2 2 22221
2 2 22221
2 2 12222
2 2 22221
2 2 22221
2 2 22221
2 2 22221
2 2 22221
1 2 22221
2 2 22221
2 2 22221
2 2 22221
2 2 22221
2 2 22221
2 2 22221
2 2 22221
2 2 22221
2 2 22221
1 1 22221
2 2 22221
2 2 22221
2 2 22212
2 2 22221
1 1 22221
2 2 22221
2 2 22221
2 2 22221
1 1 22221
6 1
5 1
1 1
§221
1 ! !!
2221
1121
2221
1121
2221
6 I) 2 1
2 2 2
1 1121
1 5321
1 2221
1 1121
i i I
B-12
-------
APPENDIX B CONT'D
LISTING OF PHASE II TEST VEHICLE USE AND MAINTENANCE DATA
HODL
VTN
VAN
.-;:j JR HAM. BUM"__
iiifsr™'"'2'5'
llfeBi!
ili|
7j 72 CffiV VSGA
JM$Z3
6D47R20257278
1V15B2U474761
1V11B2U2B8372
1V77B2U435097
V77B2U431500
X69F2W136701
1X27D2L152889
3332343
3434243
2442243
2432343
2J32343
3 3 3 1 3 4 4
1443243
3442333
DENVER
ODOM P N Y MD C S E W G B V TD WT U H ST R M A SB DS D LO LT MAR NW PP UL I H2
~T78T9~"l~1~2"2~4~4~4~2~4~4
34000 1122 2444231
24016 1122 3444143
30747 1122 3432343
50694 1242
49157 1132
36476 1222
«7670 2232
--i -3 THFV HALI 1D37F2K530574 35288 41
f i mi
m I £EV CHEL X* H2L161175
'M 72 CHEV MONT 1H57J2S538970
*57 72 CHEV NOVA 1X27H2L130404
890 72 CHEV NOVA 1X27K2L146595
891 72 CHEV HONT 1H57U2K523319
72 CHEV IHPA 1M47S2C168995
:",' 72 CHEV CHEL 1H45V2C208706
^ 72 CHRY NEW? CH41H2C172718
2 24
i is i
2 U 4 3
27735 2222
5 111
$
525'
896 '
i72 DODG DART LH41C2R149934
.,j 72 DODG DART LH41C2R354009
897 72 DODG DART LH23G2B347982
898 72 DODG POLA DH43K2F192246
899 72 FORD PINT 2X10X202633
900 72 FORD PINT 2R11W119198
901 72 FORD PINT 2R10M124187
902 72 FORD HAVE 2K92T217367
903 72 FORD HOST 2F04Q121527
W 72 FORD HATE 2K91F116354
90S 72 FORD HAVE 2K92F140393
906 72 FORD HAVE 2K92L142629
W7 72 FORD GALA 2G54S16495.1
90S 72 FORD STAW 2H42H214488
?0? 72 FORD LTD 2P76N160160
"'- 72 FORD LTD 2P&3S158939
60729 4242
47703 1132
50150 1132
54236 2132
68731 2132
28500 1212
26326 4222
71462 4232
29534 2122
7823 3112
73884 4132
35140 3122
16841
112
47746 3132
17624 1 1 1 2
44542 4132
52927 3 1
56300 1 1
39794 3 2
24994 1 1
2222
P* II »B sIS
^3 K POHT CATA
32 ]\ {$» COOP r_nvuDMU,
•"» * as ^°
2J69M2L114680
2D4|M2Z1059?5
2D37M2A208!?0
2D37T2Z108708
2L39R2C324121
O ft Dn»» A jj |J J J *• '
932 ]\ SE& '900
* s 88 iTr«
sp^i
raifes
TOjf
20320 1112
13532 1232
19868 4112
32308 4122
^390 2132
26900 4122
57206 4 i 3 2
57087 1232
s?y?:
lll
1441J
24443
24413
34443
34423
24345
24424
34434
44134
44334
44144
244244
III l\\
344413
244234
1 122 2222
2 122 2222
1 122 2222
5 122 2222
5 422 2222
2 122 2222
2 122 2222
4 422 2222
2 122 2222
4 422 2222
1 1222222
4 422 2122
32 2442343
22 2442343
3442344
18599 1122 2434312
M 123
3431
,.424i;
4 3 I) 3 2 4 ?
444414 i
*P
4 4 1
444343
443342
442343
2442344 4
2443243 3
2444343 1
3442344 6
j
6
10
4
3
1
4
2
122 1222
422 2222
122 2222
222 2222
4 122 2222
1 121 2222
3 122 2222
1 1222222
222
1 2 2
422
322
422
422
422
1 2 2
422
1 2 2
1 2 2
222
422
222
3 2 1
122
1 2 1
1 2 2
222
1 2 2
1 2 2
1 2 2
1 2 2
222
1 2 2
3 2 2
1 2 1
1 2 2
1 2 2
1 2 2
222
222
4 2 1
222
1 2 2
222
22
22
4
4 _ _
422
322
222
222
1 2 2
1 2 1
4 2 1
1 2 2
\\2
2222
2122
2222
2221
2222
2222
2222
2222
2222
2222
2222
2222
2222
2222
2221
2222
2122
2222
2222
2212
1122
2222
2122
1122
1122
2222
2222
2222
2222
2222
2222
2222
2222
1211
2222
2222
2222
2222
2222
2222
2222
2222
2222
2222
2222
2221
2222
1 2111
2 22221
2 21222
2 22221
2 22221
2 22221
2 22221
2 22222
2 22221
2 22221
1 21122
2 22221
2 ?2221
2 22221
2 22221
2 22221
2 22221
2 2222'
2 22221
2 22221
2 22221
2 22221
2 22221
2 22221
2 22221
2 22221
2 22221
2 22221
2 22221
2 22221
2 22221
2 22221
2 22221
2 1
2 1
2 1
2 2 22221
2 1 22221
2 2 22221
2 1 22221
2 2 22221
2 2 22221
2 2 22221
2 2 21222
2 2 22221
2 2 22221
1 2 21222
2 2 22221
2 1 22221
2 2 22221
2 2 22221
2 2 22221
2 2 22221
2 2 22221
2 2 22221
2 2 22221
2 2 22221
2 2 22212
2 2 22221
2 2 22221
2 2 22221
2 2 22221
2 2 22221
2 2 22221
2 2 22221
2 2 22221
2 2 22221
2 2 22221
2 2 12222
2 2 22221
2 2 22221
1 2 22221
3 4 1
3 4 1
3 3 1
452
3 4 2
3 5 1
4 4 1
3 3 1
2 2 1
232
2222
2222
2 22221
2 22221
2 1
2 1
11211
44211
11211
11211
34211
43211
11211
22211
2 1 1
2 1 1
2 1 1
2 1 1
I2il :
34211
32211
11211
34211
11211
53211
33211
1211
3211
2211
3211
53211
11211
22211
11211
34211
34211
22211
32211
2221 1
22211
22211
54211
44211
22211
34211
53211
11211
11211
14211
54211
34211
52211
34211
44211
22211
14211
22211
54211
2 1 1
2 1 1
2 1 1
2 1 1
14211
11211
11211
22211
22211
22211
53211
11211
B-13
-------
-------
APPENDIX C
-------
APPENDIX C - LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
RESULTS ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
Legend
VEH NO. - Vehicle Number
YR - Model Year
MAKE - Vehicle Make
MODL - Vehicle Model
CID - Engine Displacement in Cubic Inches
TEST TYPE - Indicates the Portion of the Test or Composite
COLD TRANS - Cold transient portion of test
COLD STAB - Cold stabilized portion of test
HOT TRANS - Hot transient portion of test
1972 FTP - Composite of Cold Transient and Cold
Stabilized tests (equivalent to 1972
Federal Test Procedure)
1975 FTP - 1975 Federal Test Procedure composite
HC - Hydrocarbon Emissions in grams per mile
CO - Carbon Monoxide Emissions in grams per mile
C02 - Carbon Dioxide Emissions in grams per mile
NOXC - Oxides of Nitrogen Emissions Corrected for Humidity in
grams per mile
FUEL ECON - Fuel Economy Calculated by the Carbon Balance Method in
miles per gallon
IHC - Hydrocarbon Concentration with Vehicle at Normal Idle,
Measured with Garage-type Instrumentation in parts per
million Hexane equivalent
IC° tACTJ ~ Carbon Monoxide Concentration with Vehicle at Normal Idle,
Measured with Garage-type Instrumentation in per cent.
ICO [SPEC]
Carbon Monoxide Concentration with Vehicle at Normal Idle,
as specified by the manufacturer.
C-l
-------
INOX -
OTHER TESTS -
Oxides of Nitrogen Concentration with Vehicle at Normal
Idle, measured by the Chemilurainescence method in PPM.
Lists Other Emission Factors Tests Conducted on the
Vehicle
was used in the Modal Emissions Program
was used in Highway Fuel Economy test
was used in the Clayton Key Mode testing
was used in both Low Speed and High Speed
programs
was used in both Federal Short Cycle and
Three Mode testing programs
was used in the Maintenance Effectiveness
program
AFTER MAINTENANCE - Presents the Federal Test Procedure results
obtained after maintenance
MODAL
HFET
KEYMODE
LO/UI
SC/3M
MTCE EFF
- Vehicle
- Vehicle
- Vehicle
program
- Vehicle
testing
- Vehicle
Federal
- Vehicle
testing
C-2
-------
APPENDIX C
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO. YR
001 75
IHC =
MAKE MODL
CHEV T
150 PPM
ICO[ACT] =
ICO[SPEC]=
INOX
OTHER
AFTER
002 75
IHC =
=
TESTS:
RUC
CID
350
HEXANE
2.7
N/A
45
MAINTENANC
CHEV T
305 PPM
ICOtACT] -
ICO[S
INOX
OTHER
AFTER
003 75
T IY *t
IHC =
J- v 1 J L A
PEC] =
-
TESTS :
MAINTEN
RUC
%CO
%CO
PPM
E
350
HEXANE
6.9
N/A
29
ANC
CHEV TRUC
230 PPM
CT I
ICO[SPEC]=
INOX
* •» \j /\
OTHER
=
56CO
%CO
PPM
E
350
HEXANE
0 . 2
35
TESTS
MAINTENANC
1 r1 o
%CO
PPM
E
TEST TYPE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
HFET MODAL
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
HFET MODAL
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
HFET MODAL
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
HC
10.07
5.88
7.33
7.88
7.14
KEYMO
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
3-45
3.64
2.65
3-55
3-33
KEYMO
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
4 .50
1 .41
2.37
2.89
2 31
KEYMO
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
GRAMS
CO
97.
102.
73-
100.
93-
DE SC
100.
130.
72.
1 16.
108 .
DE SC
64.
7.
35.
34.
26.
DE SC
4
9
7
3
8
/
7
5
4
2
5
/
8
4
2
9
8
PER MILE
C02
505
516
474
511
502
3M
578
549
532
563
550
3M
576
688
547
634
627
3M
.7
.6
.7
.4
.9
.4
.0
.7
. 1
.6
.7
.3
.9
.8
.0
NOXC
1 .87
0.95
1 .64
1.39
1 -33
3.12
0.95
2 .72
1 .99
1 .88
2.01
1.21
1 .31
1 .59
1 .40
MPG
FUEL
ECON
12.9
12.7
14.5
12.8
13-2
11.9
11.6
13-6
11.7
12.1
12.8
12.6
14.5
12.7
13-1
C-3
-------
APPENDIX C.CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO. YR
004 75
IHC =
icoU
ICO[S
INOX
OTHER
AFTER
005 75
IHCs
MAKE MODL CID
CHEV TRUC 350
30 PPM HEXANE
CT] =
PEC] =
TESTS'
MAINTEN
DODG T
20 PPM
ICOUCT] -
ICO[SPEC]=
INOX
OTHER
AFTER
006 75
IHCs
ICOU
TESTS:
0.0 *CO
N/A %CO
39 PPM
ANCE
RUC 318
HEXANE
1 .5 $CO
0 . 3 %CO
52 PPM
MAINTENANCE
FORD T
15 PPM
CT] _
ICO[SPEC]=
INOX
OTHER
AFTER
=
TESTS-
MAINTEN
RUC 302
HEXANE
0.0 %CO
N/A KO
39 PPM
ANCE
TEST TYPE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
HFET MODAL
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
HFET MODAL
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
HFET MODAL
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
GRAMS
HC CO
2.08 33.
0.33 0.
0.62 10.
1.17
0.77
KEYMODE
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
5-24
2.69
2.56
3.91
3.18
KEYMODE
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
3-93
1 .24
2.08
2.53
2.02
KEYMODE
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
16.
10.
SC
53.
60.
35.
57.
52.
SC
74.
25.
52.
48.
42.
SC
PE
0
6
7
1
0
/3M
4
3
6
0
2
/3M
9
0
8
9
8
/3M
R MI
C02
705.
671.
631.
687.
667.
666.
609-
589.
636.
615.
573-
674.
550.
626.
620.
HPG
LE FUEL
NOXC ECOH
0 1-31 11.6
0 2.00 13,2
1 3-69 13,1
3 3.11 12.1!
1 2.91 13.0
0 2.83 11.6
3 1.58 12.5
5 2.55 13.6
4 2.18 12.0
6 2.10 12.5
5 0.84 12-6
4 *) It
9 0.59 12-'
« i n
0 0.80 13.5
_ f
H 0.71 12-5
. . 0
0 0.70 12-8
C-4
-------
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO. YR
007 75
IHC =
MAKE MODL
FORD T
10 PPM
ICOtACT] =
ICOtSPEC]=
INOX
OTHER
AFTER
008 75
IHC =
=
TESTS :
RUC
CID
302
HEXANE
0.0
N/A
90
%CO
%CO
PPM
MAINTENANCE
FORD TRUC
20 PPM
ICOtACT] =
ICO[SPEC]=
INOX
OTHER
AFTER
009 75
IHC =
T r>/\ r —
J-COlS
INOX
*• V A
OTHER
AFTER
TESTS:
MAINTEN
FORD T
95 PPM
CT J _
rE C J =
=
HEX
0. 1
N/A
22
ANCE
RUC
351
ANE
%CO
%CO
PPM
351
HEXANE
1 .0
N/A
82
%CQ
%CO
PPM
TESTS-
MAINTENANCE
TEST TYPE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
HFET MODAL
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
HFET MODAL
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
HFET MODAL
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP -
75 FTP
- -G R
HC
1.17
o .30
0.63
0.72
0.57
KEYMODE
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
2.67
2.08
1 .99
2.36
2.18
KEYMODE
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
3-43
2.55
2.70
2.97
2.77
KEYMODE
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
:AMS
CO
27.9
1 .4
9.0
14.1
8.9
SC/
51 . 1
40.5
37.1
45-5
41 .7
SC/
63.0
55.0
46.6
58.8
PER MILE
C02
570.
600 .
512.
585.
570.
3M
636.
638.
565.
637.
618.
3M
586.
576.
527.
581 .
54.3 565.
SC/3M
0
4
6
8
2
1
7
9
5
3
7
6
1
4
2
NOXC
1 .
0.
1 .
0.
0.
3.
1 .
3.
2.
2.
3-
1 .
3-
2.
2.
01
76
03
88
89
50
46
18
44
35
52
63
35
54
49
MPG
FUEL
ECON
14.4
14.7
16.8
14.5
15.1
12.2
12.5
14. 1
12 .4
12.8
12.7
13-2
14.6
13-0
13.5
05
-------
ON
LISTING
INDIVIDUAL
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
VEHICLES BEFORE
AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO. YR
0
0
10 75
IHC =
ICO[A
ICO[S
INOX
OTHER
AFTER
11 75
IHC =
ICO[A
MAKE MODL CID
CMC TRUC 350
20 PPM HEXANE
CT] - 0.0 *CO
PEC]= N/A *CO
. 164 PPM
TESTS:
MAINTENANCE
AMMO HORN 258
180 PPM HEXANE
CT] = 1 .0 %CO
ICO[SPEC]= 1 .0 %CQ
0
INOX
OTHER
AFTER
12 75
IHC =
- 106 PPM
TESTS:
MAINTENANCE
BUIC CNTY 350
1 10 PPM HEXANE
TEST TYPE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
HFET MODAL
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
HFET MODAL
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
H
3-
0.
0.
1 .
1 .
KEY
N/
N/
N/
— GR
C
41
32
55
80
02
MODE
A
A
A
AMS
CO
80.
0.
2.
38.
17-
SC
PE
2
3
2
5
3
/3M
R MI
C02
629.
662.
624.
646.
645.
LE-
1
6
3
6
3
NOXC
1.78
1.11
1.78
1.15
1.45
HPG
FUEL
ECOH
11.6
13.1
11.1
12.5
13.1
N/A
N/
3.
1 .
2.
2 .
2.
A
34
91
12
59
26
KEYMODE
3-
1 .
1 .
2.
1 .
3.
2.
2.
39
26
61
28
80
58
51
10
ICOUCT] 0.1 %CQ
ICO[S
INOX
OTHER
AFTER
PEC]= N/A %CO
47 PPM
TESTS-
MAINTENANCE
72 FTP 3
75 FTP
HFET MODAL
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
.02
68.
84.
20.
17-
51 -
32.
9
3
1
2
7
LO/HI
89-
10.
17.
48.
28.
90.
49.
45.
8
3
4
9
2
7
2
2
1
558
2.62 56.5
KEYMODE LO/HI
2.
1 .
1 .
1 .
1 .
96
05
30
97
51
82.
27.
39-
53.
42.
3
9
1
9
1
433-
453-
415.
444.
439.
SC/
491 .
492.
447.
492.
480.
560.
556.
511-
.2
9
2
7
0
0
3M
9
9
5
5
3
4
2
0
1.4
544.7
SC/3M
561.
590.
526.
576.
566.
9
1
4
6
9
2.71
3.66
3.86
3.21
3.52
MTCE
2.22
2.74
2.79
2.49
2.65
1.84
1.08
1.80
4 1
1.43
MTCE
1.72
f n
0.67
1.47
. 4 fl
1 .17
4 f\
1 .10
15.^
18.1
19-8
16.1
1T.8
EFF
13-8
IT-]
18.5
15. k
16.7
12.*
.1 8
I}'8
«r 1
15-'
3-1
41 fi
13-B
EFF
1? 1
it-1
13. f
1 J '
llj.O
1 J
13-3
i j
13-5
i J
C-6
-------
ON
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
N0. YR MAKE MODL CID
013 75 BUIC RIVI 455
IHC= 180 PPM HEXANE
ICOUCT] - 2.2 %CO
ICO[SPEC]= N/A *CO
INOX - 39 PPM
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANCE
TEST
TYPE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
HFET
COLD
MODAL
TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT
TRANS
72 FTP
011 75 BUIC REGA 350
IHC= 240 PPM HEXANE
ICO[ACT] 1 .8 %CO
ICO[SPEC]= N/A %CO
INOX = 26 PPM
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANCE
75 F
COLD
COLD
HOT
72 F
75 F
HFET
COLD
COLD
HOT
TP
TRANS
STAB
TRANS
TP
TP
MODAL
TRANS
STAB
TRANS
72 FTP
015 75 CADI ELDO 500
T \3f*
1HC= 300 PPM HEXANE
ICOUCT] = 3.0 %CO
lSn''SPEC~' = N/A *CO
X = 95 PPM
OTHER TESTS-
AFTER MAINTENANCE
75 F
COLD
COLD
HOT
72 F
TP
TRANS
STAB
TRANS
TP
75 FTP
HFET MODAL
COLD TRANS
COLD
HOT
STAB
TRANS
72 FTP -
75 F
TP
2
2
2
2
2
KE
2
1
1
2
2
3
3
2
3
3
, i
HC
.81
.99
• 31
• 90
.77
GRAMS PER MILE
CO C02
59.
73-
48.
67.
64.
,5
9
4
0
0
687
638,
625.
662.
645.
.5
.7
,6
,0
,2
i
NOXC
2.31
0.75
1 .50
1 .50
1 .28
YMODE LO/HI SC/3M MTCE
.54
• 93
.75
.23
.01
.84
.08
.66
.45
. 12
65.
45.
51 .
55.
51 .
105.
91 -
72.
98.
89.
KEYMODE LO
2
0
1
1
1
9
5
6
7
.64
.99
• 30
.78
.42
.54
.79
• 34
.59
61 .
23.
35.
41 .
34.
212.
134.
181 .
171 .
9
2
7
1
2
5
2
4
0
0
/HI
0
9
7
6
7
8
0
6
7
6.71 163-2
KEYMODE LO/HI
7.49 193.7
4
4
6
5
.72
.54
.04
.24
108.
156.
149.
139.
7
8
4
3
681 .
666.
609.
673-
654.
565.
540.
510.
552.
537.
SC/
60.4
636.
544.
623.
605.
674.
628.
573-
650.
622.
SC/
659-
646.
595.
652.
634.
,4
5
6
6
1
2
5
2
3
3
3M
0
3
3
5
1
6
1
4
8
3M
0
3
0
4
9
1.91
0.82
1.11
1.34
1 . 12
1.41
0.75
1.14
1 .06
0.99
MTCE
1-34
0.49
0.94
0.90
0.79
0.87
1 .47
1.13
1 . 18
1 .25
MTCE
0.84
1.34
0.91
1.10
1.12
MPG
FUEL
ECON
11.2
11.6
12.5
11.4
11.8
EFF
1 1
1 1
12
1 1 .
12
1 1
12
14
12
12
EFF
12
13
14
12
13
8
10
10
9
9
EFF
9
10
10
9
10
.2
.9
.7
6
.0
.9
.8
.0
.4
.9
4
. 1
.7
.8
.4
.5
.3
. 1
.4
.9
.0
.7
.4
.8
.2
C-7
-------
ON
APPENDIX C,COKT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST
INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE
DENVER
PROCEDURE
AND AFTER
RESULTS
MAINTENANCE
VEH
NO. YR MAKE MODL
016 75 CHEV V
IHC= 240 PPM
ICOUCT] -
ICO[SPEC]=
INOX
OTHER TESTS:
EGA
CID
140
HEXANE
6.6
N/A
40
AFTER MAINTENANC
017 75 CHEV NOVA
IHC= 190 PPM
ICO[ACT]
ICO[SPEC]=
INOX
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTEN
*CO
*CO
PPM
E
250
HEXANE
0.3
N/A
62
ANC
018 75 CHEV MONT
IHC= 15 PPM
ICOUCT] =
ICO[SPEC]=
INOX
OTHER TESTS:
$co
$co
PPM
E
350
HEXANE
0.0
N/A
90
AFTER MAINTENANC
*CO
*CO
PPM
E
TEST TYPE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
HFET MODAL
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
HFET MODAL
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
HFET MODAL
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
GRAMS
HC CO
2
0
0
1
1
.06
.90
.89
.45
.14
KEYMODE
3
0
0
1
1
4
0
0
2
1
.41
. 49
.81
.89
.18
.02
.33
.58
. 10
.16
KEYMODE
1
0
0
0
0
2
1
1
1
1
.90
. 1 1
.46
.97
.57
.42
.25
• 13
.81
.46
KEYMODE
2
1
1
2
1
.97
-49
.43
.19
.78
48.
22.
19.
34.
27.
PE
2
7
4
9
0
LO/HI
51 .
15.
18.
32.
23-
47.
2.
10.
23.
13-
LO
34.
0.
6.
16.
8.
65.
39.
37.
51 .
44.
LO
75.
41 .
41 .
57.
48.
6
6
9
8
9
6
1
4
9
7
/HI
0
4
2
5
9
0
4
4
6
1
/HI
1
8
8
8
7
R MI
C02
326.
351 .
300.
339.
332.
SC/
353-
380.
328.
367.
360.
528.
518.
476.
523-
509.
SC/
502.
483-
467.
492.
483.
540.
543-
496.
542.
529-
LE-
2
5
0
4
2
3M
3
1
7
3
6
5
3
8
2
1
3M
6
9
8
9
4
9
0
3
0
8
SC/3M
556.
560.
503-
558.
544.
1
5
5
4
1
NOXC
1.71
1.20
1.68
1.15
1.11
MICE
1.29
0.86
1 .07
1.06
1.01
2.37
2.08
2.26
2.22
2.19
MICE
2.19
2.16
2.10
2.18
2.15
1.96
0.78
1.55
1.35
1.23
MTCE
1.61
__ rt
0.78
1 .39
- ,0
1 .1°
- 4 1
1.12
HPG
FOEL
ECOH
21.?
22 8
*• «« • v
26.6
22.3
23-5
EFF
19-f
21.5
2U
20.5
22.1
1U
17.0
11.5
15.6
16.6
EFF
15.8
18.3
18.5
11.3
17.«
t ji £
ll.o
«r 0
15-'
t i
11-1
A h 7
11.
rtpp
EFr
n 0
\j'v
15*5
13-5
C-8
-------
APPENDIX C ,CONT'D
LISTING OK KKDERAL TEST PROCEDUHE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
N0. YR MAKE MODL CID
019 75 CHEV CAPR 350
IHC= 150 PPM HEXANE
ICOUCT] 0.4 %CO
ICO[SPEC]= N/A %CO
INOX - 18 PPM
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANCE
020 75 CHEV IMPA 350
IHC= 15 PPM HEXANE
ICO[ACT] = 0.1 %CQ
ICO[SPEC]= N/A %CQ 12
INOX - 82 PPM
OTHER TESTS-
AFTER MAINTENANCE
TEST
COLD
COLD
HOT
72 F
75 F
HFET
COLD
COLD
HOT
72 F
75 F
COLD
COLD
HOT
FTP
75 F
HFET
COLD
COLD
HOT
TYPE
TRANS
STAB
TRANS
TP
TP
MODAL
TRANS
STAB
TRANS
TP
TP
TRANS
STAB
TRANS
2
TP
MODAL
TRANS
STAB
TRANS
72 FTP
021 75 CHEV STAW 400
T It f\
1HC= 30 PPM HEXANE
ICO[ACT] = o.1 %CO
JCO[SPEC]a N/A %CO
INOX = 61 PPM
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANCE
75 F
COLD
COLD
HOT
TP
TRANS
STAB
TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
HFET MODAL
COLD TRANS
COLD
HOT
STAB
TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
3
1
1
2
2
r* c
HC
.29
.68
.86
.45
.06
KEYMODE
2
1
1
2
1
3
1
1
. 10
1
.98
.23
.50
.07
.66
.30
.00
.44
67.
.60
KEYMODE
2
0
1
1
1
4
0
2
2
.91
.85
.24
.84
.38
.19 1
.31
.07
. 17
1 .59
KEYMODE
3-07
0
1
1
1
.38
.17
.67
.15
lAMS PER MILE
CO C02
65.
40.
48.
52.
47.
3
4
6
3
8
LO/HI
68.
32.
43-
50.
43-
96.
41 .
49.
9
55.
8
9
6
1
2
3
9
0
597
0
LO/HI
94.
36.
49.
64.
51 .
09.
4.
66.
54.
43-
LO
84.
2.
44.
41 .
30.
7
0
3
1
7
1
9
4
8
1
/HI
0
5
3
5
7
597.
622.
546.
610.
596.
6
4
7
5
6
SC/3M
623.
635.
560.
629.
612.
591 .
602.
548.
. 1
585.
SC/
633-
642.
572.
638.
621.
833-
835.
738.
834.
808.
SC/
788.
815.
740.
802.
789.
1
9
9
8
8
0
7
8
1 .
6
3M
3
9
8
3
8
0
0
0
0
1
3M
2
3
8
3
4
NOXC
1 73
0.71
1 .28
1 .20
1 .08
MTCE
1 .81
0.81
1 .27
1 .29
1.14
1 .70
0.81
1 .66
24 12
1 .23
MTCE
1 . 47
0.69
1 .38
1 .06
1 .04
1 .77
1 .42
1 .56
1 .59
1.53
MTCE
1.66
1 .22
1 .55
1.43
1 .40
MPG
FUEL
ECON
12.
12.
14.
12.
13-
EFF
12.
12.
14.
1 2.
12.
1 1 .
13-
14.
.5
13-
EFF
1 1 .
12.
13-
1 1 .
12 .
8.
10.
10.
9-
10 .
EFF
9-
10.
10.
10.
10.
.5
,8
1
,7
1
0
8
0
4
9
8
2
1
1
2
6
6
9
5
7
5
5
6
1
5
8
9
2
6
C-9
-------
APPENDIX C.CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO. YR
022 75
IHC =
ICOCA
MAKE
CHRY
55 P
CT]
ICO[SPEC]=
INOX
OTHER
AFTER
023 75
IHC =
MODL
NEWP
CID
400
PM HEXANE
0. 1
0.3
41
*CO
%CO
PPM
TESTS:
MAINTENANC
DODG
245 P
CORO
E
318
PM HEXANE
TEST TYPE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
HFET MODAL
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 pxp
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
—
2
0
2
1
1
GR
HC
.83
.40
.90
.56
.58
KEYMODE
3
0
1
1
1
3
3
2
.23 1
.48
.58
.80
• 35
.81
.73
. 1 1
AMS
CO
40. 1
11.2
46.1
25.0
26.7
LO/
10.4
27.8
76.0
67. *»
58.0
72.6
83. 1
32.6
PER MI
C02
723.
749.
662.
736.
719.
HI SC/
781 .
818.
709.
800.
781 .
575.
519.
529-
LE-
0
0
1
6
9
3M
2
9
4
8
2
3
4
2
NOXC
2.98
1.62
2.13
2.2?
2.04
MICE
1.37
1.00
1.39
1.17
1.18
3.26
1.89
3.26
HPO
FOEL
ECOI
1] p
* * * C
11. J
11.5
11. \
ll.i
SFF
9.2
10.3
IOJ
9.7
10.1
12.?
13.1
15.1
ICOUCT] 3 3.8 *CO
ICO[SPEC]= 0.3 %CO 12 FTP
INOX 59 PPM
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANCE
024 75 DODG DART 225
IHC= 380 PPM HEXANE
ICOUCT] = 6.7 *CO
ICO[SPEC]r
INOX =
0-3
37
%CO
PPM
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANCE
75 FTP
HFET MODAL
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
HFET MODAL
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
3.77 78.1 546.1 2.55 13-0
3-31 67.2 533-5 2.55 13.7
KEYMODE LO/HI SC/3M MTCE EFF
2.45 40.9 589.9 3-29 13-»
1U
0.49
0.56
1 .43
0.91
6.8
3.1
23. 1
12.8
593-3
547.7
591.7
580.1
2.06
4.30 16.8
2.65 1M
2.93 M
3-95 73.5
3-47 71.2
3.03 58.4
412.7 3.46
363.7 1.61
355.0 2.59
18,
19-
3-70 72.3 387.2 2.50
K
3
45
EYMODE
2
0
0
1
0
.
.
•
05
28
66
13
75
68
.2
LO/
38
5
20
14
.0
.0
t 4
'.8
. 1
371
HI SC/
462
463
428
463
453
.
.
t
.
,
4
3M
6
7
6
2
9
2.
26
18
^nl?
MTCE B»J
2.
1.
1 •
1.
1.
7b
— f\
09
it *i
43
89
f *i
53
l«
18
1 u
14
( 7
18
C-10
-------
APPENDIX C.CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE
DENVER
PROCEDURE
AND AFTER
RESULTS
MAINTENANCE
VEH
00. YR MAKE MO
DL
CID
025 75 FORD MUST 140
IHC= 20 PPM HEXANE
ICOtACT] - 0
ICO[SPEC]= N
INOX -
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENA
. 1
/A
35
NCE
026 75 FORD TORI
IHC= 32 PPM
ICO[ACT] - 0
ICO[SPEC]= N
INOX
OTHER TESTS:
%CO
%CO
PPM
351
HEXANE
.0
/A
26
%CO
%CO
PPM
AFTER MAINTENANCE
°2? 75 FORD GR
T 1 1 r\
1HC= Ijo PPM
:CO[ACT] = 0
ICO[SPEC]= M
T hi r\ «•
INOX
OTHER TESTS-
AFTER MAINTENA
AN
HEX
.0
/A
46
NCE
250
ANE
*CO
%CQ
PPM
TEST TYPE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
HFET MODAL
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
HFET MODAL
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
HFET MODAL
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
HC CO C02
2
0
1
1
1
.47
.57
.34
.48
.17
28.4
16.4
18.2
22. 1
19.3
KEYMODE LO/H
1
0
1
1
0
2
1
1
1
1
.92
.47
.02
.16
.92
.46
.29
.44
.85
.57
KEYMODE
2
1
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
KE
1
0
0
0
0
.16
.26
.13
.69
.41
.05
.26
.68
.64
.54
YMODE
. 10
.27
.78
.67
.58
18. 1
12.0
14.2
14.9
13-9
38.5
28. 1
27-9
33.1
30.2
LO/H
32.3
26.1
21 .5
29. 1
26.1
18.5
0.4
8.7
9-1
6.4
LO/H
23-8
0.7
5.7
1 1 .8
6.8
447.
472.
407.
460.
449.
3
2
6
3
5
I SC/3M
436.
458.
388.
447.
434.
643-
628.
586.
636.
620.
I SC/
654.
646.
585.
650.
631.
608.
595.
546.
601 .
584.
I SC/
586.
586.
523-
586.
569-
1
0
3
5
5
9
7
6
0
4
3M
3
2
6
1
3
5
7
1
8
8
3M
5
6
3
5
3
NOXC
0.90
0.70
0.88
0.80
0.79
MTCE
1 .05
0.74
1 .03
0.89
0.88
2 .83
1.63
2.49
2.20
2.11
MTCE
3.28
1 .89
2.74
2.56
2.41
1 .30
1 .05
1.17
1.17
1.14
MTCE
1 .30
0.97
1.29
1.13
1.13
r U&L
ECON
17.
17.
20.
17.
18.
EFF
18.
18.
21 .
18.
19.
12.
13-
14.
12.
13-
EFF
12.
12.
14.
12.
13-
13-
14.
15.
14.
14.
EFF
14.
15.
16.
14.
15.
8
8
2
8
4
9
6
4
7
3
5
1
0
8
2
5
8
2
7
1
8
9
8
4
9
1
1
6
6
3
C-ll
-------
APPENDIX C.CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO. YR MAKE MODL CID
028 75 FORD LT
IHC= 100 PPM
ICO[ACT] 0
ICO[SPEC]= N
INOX
OTHER TESTS:
D 351
HEXANE
c ICO
/A *CO
39 PPM
AFTER MAINTENANCE
029 75 FORD LTD 400
IHC= 30 PPM
ICOUCT] - 0
HEXANE
. 3 %CO
ICO[SPEC]= N/A %CQ
INOX
OTHER TESTS:
42 PPM
AFTER MAINTENANCE
030 75 MERC MARQ 400
IHC= 210 PPM
ICOfACT] = 3
ICO[SPECJ= N
INOX
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENA
HEXANE
9 % C 0
/A %CO
60 PPM
NCE
TEST TYPE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
HFET MODAL
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
HFET MODAL
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
HFET MODAL
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
GR
HC
1
1
1
1
1
.80
.52
.61
.65
.60
KEYMODE
2
1
1
1
1
5
1
1
3
2
.31
.60
.64
.94
.76
• 31
. 12
.66
.13
.13
KEYMODE
5
1
1
3
2
3
2
2
2
.17
.07
.50
.04
.03
.15
.67
.65
.90
2.76
KEYMODE
1
0
1
1
1
.78
.87
. 1 1
.31
. 12
AMS
CO
50.
32.
36.
41 .
37.
LO
51 .
29.
33.
40.
35.
71.
42.
42.
56.
48.
LO
66.
38.
39.
51 .
44.
81 .
75.
64.
78.
73.
LO
35.
24.
31 .
29-
28.
4
5
3
1
2
/
6
9
9
3
5
2
6
5
3
4
PER MI
C02
733.
695.
618.
713.
682.
HI SC/
706.
695.
614.
700.
675.
745.
743.
638.
744.
715.
LE-
1
3
1
4
0
3M
3
1
8
5
5
5
3
4
4
1
/HI SC/3M
1
6
9
7
6
0
9
3
3
8
1
3
5
5
5
756.
749-
652.
752.
724.
722.
709.
641 .
715.
5
0
2
6
1
0
7
1
6
693-5
HI SC/3M
817.
812.
728.
814.
790.
5
1
3
7
4
NOXC
2
1
2
1
1
.18
.52
.61
.83
.95
MTCE
2
1
2
2
2
1
0
1
1
1
.42
.66
.60
.02
.07
.60
.87
.47
.22
.19
MTCE
1
0
1
1
1
2
1
2
1
.89
.96
.64
.40
.34
.3*
.24
.21
.77
1.73
MTCE
2
2
2
2
2
.92
.19
n h
.84
*- h
.54
r f\
.52
MFC
FUEL
ECON
10 8
1 v i y
11.8
i i y
13.0
11.3
11.9
EFF
11.2
11.9
13-2
11.5
12.0
10.2
10.9
12.5
10.5
11.1
EFF
10.1
10.5
12.3
10.5
11.1
10.3
. n i
10.6
4 1 fl
11. D
- p
10.5
-------
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO. YR MAKE MODL CID
031 75 MERC MONG 351
IHC= 140 PPM HEXANE
ICOtACT] = 0.5 *CO
ICO[SPEC]= N/A %CO
INOX = 56 PPM
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTEN
ANCE
032 75 OLDS DELT 350
IHC= 405 PPM
ICOtACT] =
ICO[SPEC]=
INOX
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTEN
HEXANE
4.5 $CO
N/A *CO
42 PPM
ANCE
°33 75 OLDS CUTL 350
T U n
IHC= 30 PPM
ICOUCT] -
ICO[SPEC]=
INOX
~ •» \j t\ w
HEXANE
0.1 {CO
w • • ft w w
N/A *CO
58 PPM
OTHER TESTS-
AFTER MAINTENANCE
-*
TEST TYPE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
HFET MODAL
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
HFET MODAL
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
HFET MODAL
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP "
75 FTP
r. i
HC
1 .
1 .
1 .
1 .
1 .
65
33
39
48
41
UMS PER MILE
CO C02
53-
37.
39.
45.
41 .
,8
5
2
.3
3
638.3
630.8
569 .4
634.4
615.6
KEYMODE LO/HI SC/3M
1 .
0.
0.
1 .
1 .
4.
3.
3-
4.
3-
56
79
98
16
00
98 1
45
24
18 1
71
KEYMODE
5.
1 .
2.
3-
2.
4.
2.
2.
3-
3-
KEY
2 .
1 .
1 .
1 .
1 .
41 1
93
60
59
83
1 1
97
85
51
17
MODE
81
15
92
94
70
71 .
28.
35.
48.
39.
21 .
88.
97-
04.
98.
LO
25.
62.
99-
92.
85.
86.
53.
65.
69.
63-
LO
56.
26.
46.
40.
37-
3
0
6
7
0
8
9
4
7
0
/H
5
5
6
7
6
0
8
2
2
5
/H
1
2
2
5
8
751 .
775.
676.
763.
743.
536.
526.
486.
531-
517.
I SC/
537.
543.
487.
540.
526.
527.
489.
468.
507.
491 .
I SC/
566.
545.
497.
555.
536.
2
4
4
8
4
5
8
4
4
8
3M
4
1
6
4
8
6
5
8
7
7
3M
1
5
1
3
5
NOXC
2.30
1 .26
2.29
1 .76
1 .75
MTCE
1 .32
1 .15
1 .55
1 .23
1 .29
1 .74
1 .25
1 .62
1 .49
1 .45
MTCE
1 -73
0.82
1 .32
1 .25
1.14
1 .22
0.72
1.14
0.96
0.94
MTCE
1 -37
0.52
1 .03
0.93
0.83
MPG
FUEL
ECON
12.2
12.8
14.0
12.5
1 3-0
EFF
10
10
12
10
1 1
1 1
13
13
12
13
EFF
1 1
13
13
12
13
13
15
15
14
14
EFF
13
15
15
14
14
.2
.8
. 1
.5
.0
.9
. 1
.7
.5
.0
.8
.7
.6
.7
.2
. 1
.2
• 3
. 1
.8
.4
.0
.4
.2
.8
C-13
-------
APPENDIX C .CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO. YR MAKE MODL C
ID
034 75 OLDS DELT 455
IHC= 130 PPM
ICOCACT] - 0
HEXA
.1 %
NE
CO
ICO[SPEC]= N/A 5&CO
INOX
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENA
54 P
NCE
035 75 PLYM FURY 3
IHC= 50 PPM
ICOUCT] - 1
ICO[SPEC]= 0
INOX
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENA
HEXA
. 1 %
• 3 %
98 P
NCE
PM
18
NE
CO
CO
PM
036 75 PLYM DUST 225
IHC= 70 PPM
ICOCACT] _ 1
ICO[SPEC]= 0
INOX *
HEXA
.6 %
• 3 %
87 P
NE
CO
CO
PM
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANCE
TEST TYPE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
HFET MODAL
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
HFET MODAL
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
HFET MODAL
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
—
2
1
1
2
1
KE
2
0
1
1
1
3
1
1
2
2
GR
HC
.83
.44
.50
. 1 1
.75
YMODE
• 33
.69
.08
.47
.13
.27
.58
.87
.39
.00
KEYMODE
1
0
0
1
0
4
2
3
3
3
.82
.32
.73
.04
.74
.52
.78
.20
.61
.25
KEYMODE
6.05
2
3
3
3
.02
.26
.95
.19
AMS
CO
52.
24.
32.
38.
32.
LO
55.
17.
41 .
35.
31.
98.
36.
28.
66.
47.
8
7
1
1
5
/
4
4
6
6
8
2
9
1
2
1
LO/
31 .
6.
7.
18.
1 1 .
69-
51 .
51 -
60.
55-
LO
65-
49-
43-
57.
51 .
3
7
0
5
8
0
9
2
1
2
2
9
7
2
3
PER MI
C02
656.
616.
547.
635.
605.
HI SC/
660.
610.
554.
634.
605-
549.
606.
537.
579.
575.
HI SC/
595.
623-
548.
609.
596.
409.
429-
356.
419-
405.
LE
NOXC
3
3
7
4
8
3M
1
0
9
0
3
1
6
4
0
9
3M
8
0
1
9
9
5
4
8
9
5
HI SC/3M
399-0
413-
348.
406.
392.
7
0
7
7
1.78
1.10
1.59
1.43
1-37
MTCE
1.16
0.99
1.09
1 .07
1.05
1.64
1 .24
2.46
1.43
1.65
MTCE
2.70
1.32
3.41
1.98
2.17
1.89
1.27
1.68
1.57
1.51
MTCE
2.56
1.57
f i
2.13
_ /* ]i
2 .04
n "5
1 .93
HPG
FUEL
ECON
11.9
* 7
13.5
11.?
12,6
13.1
SFF
11.8
13-9
1U
12. a
13.5
12.1
13-3
15-1
12.9
13-5
EFF
13-6
111.0
A
15-8
. i 0
13.8
iM
16.?
t ft \
IT-'
., B
19.8
16.9
* ft f
1?.'
— nP
EFr
1T-0
if 8
II1
20-8
Cv
If."
C-14
-------
APPENDIX C.CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER
DENVER
RESULTS
MAINTENANCE
VEH
NO. YR MAKE MODL
037 75 PONT CATA
CID
400
IHC= 250 PPM HEXANE
ICOtACT] = 1 .0
ICO[SPEC]= N/A
INOX = 30
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANC
038 75 PONT LEMA
%CO
%CO
PPM
E
350
IHC= 45 PPM HEXANE
ICO[ACT] = 0.1
ICO[SPEC]= N/A
INOX 15
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANC
°39 75 PONT GRNV
%CO
%CO
PPM
E
455
JHC= 60 PPM HEXANE
ICOUCT] H o.O
JCO[SPEC]= N/A
INOX = 5Q
OTHER TESTS-
AFTER MAINTENANC
ico
y w \j
%co
PPM
E
TEST TYPE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
HFET MODAL
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
HFET MODAL
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
HFET MODAL
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP ^
75 FTP
HC CO
3
0
1
2
1
.70
.75
.23
. 16
.49
36.
13.
18.
24.
19.
8
0
2
4
3
KEYMODE LO/
2
0
0
1
1
8
1
2
4
3
.74
.45
.91
.55
.05
.141
.68
.42
.77
.21
KEYMODE
5
0
1
3
1
3
0
1
2
.73
.84
.37
.18
.99
.45
.79
• 97
.06
1 .66
KEYMODE
3-15
1
2
2
1
.31
.20
.19
.93
38.
9-
18.
23.
17.
18.
34.
53-
74.
56.
LO
99.
18.
33.
57.
39.
82.
33.
55.
56.
2
5
4
2
8
0
6
0
5
8
/
2
3
4
1
1
5
4
2
9
r c, n n x LJ c,
C02
626.
624.
577.
625.
611 .
.6
,2
3
4
9
HI SC/3M
644.
687.
601 .
666.
655.
532.
566.
504.
550.
542.
HI SC/
576.
621 .
534.
600.
588.
713-
733.
630.
723-
49.5 701.
LO/HI SC/
91.1 710.
38.
56.
63.
54.
5
1
7
1
743.
639-
727 -
708.
1
4
9
7
2
4
5
8
2
7
3M
6
5
5
0
5
7
0
5
8
1
3M
9
1
8
7
3
NOXC
3-01
1 .92
3-05
2.44
2.45
MTCE
2.78
1 .93
3-58
2 .34
2.55
1.56
1 .08
1 .27
1.31
1 .23
MTCE
2.28
2.58
2.63
2.44
2.53
1.01
0.83
1 .28
0.91
0.99
MTCE
0.92
0.64
1 .01
0.77
0.80
P UfcL
ECON
12.
13-
14.
13-
13.
EFF
12.
12.
14.
12.
12.
1 1 .
14.
14.
13-
13.
EFF
1 1 .
13-
15.
12 .
13-
10.
1 1 .
12.
10.
1 1 .
EFF
10.
11 .
12.
10.
1 1 .
7
7
6
2
7
5
6
0
5
9
9
2
9
0
8
8
6
0
7
5
4
3
3
8
3
3
0
1
6
1
C-15
-------
ON
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORR AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO. YR
040 76
IHC =
ICO[A
MAKE
CAPR
MODL
SEDA
CID
140
300 PPM HEXANE
CT] -
ICO[SPEC]=
INOX
OTHER
AFTER
041 75
IHC =
_
TESTS
MAINTE
DATS
7.7
N/A
65
;
NANCE
B210
%CO
%CO
PPM
85
220 PPM HEXANE
ICO[ACT] =
ICO[SPEC]=
INOX
OTHER
AFTER
042 75
IHC =
_
TESTS
0.8
2.0
41
"
%CO
%CQ
PPM
MAINTENANCE
HOND
SEDA
91
90 PPM HEXANE
ICOCACT] -
ICO[S
INOX
OTHER
AFTER
PEC] =
=
2.2
1 .5
42
%co
%CQ
PPM
TESTS:
MAINTENANCE
TEST TYPE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
HFET MODAL
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
HFET MODAL
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
HFET MODAL
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
--
2
2
0
2
1
GR
HC
.88
.17
.83
.51
.95
KEYMODE
2
5
2
4
3
2
1
1
2
1
KE
2
1
1
2
1
3
1
1
2
.64
.42 1
.02
.09
.92
.71
.73
.91
.20
.98
YMODE
• 90
.62
.65
• 23
.89
.20
.58
.87
• 35
1 .99
KEYMODE
2.24
1
1
1
1
.47
.53
.84
.65
AMS
CO
34.9
57.2
15.7
46.5
41.3
LO/
35.9
11 .9
36.8
75.5
75.7
60.2
33.1
37.8
46.0
39.9
LO/
65.9
34.1
37.6
49.3
41 .6
63.8
46.0
53-9
54.5
51 .8
LO/
51 .9
37.8
45.6
44.6
42.8
PER MI
C02
489.
440.
441 .
464.
450.
HI SC/
425.
280.
355.
349.
331.
279.
258.
259-
268.
263-
HI SC/
304.
262.
266.
282.
272.
246.
297.
231-
273-
LE-
9
5
5
1
9
3M
1
8
8
9
0
2
9
3
6
2
3M
3
1
7
3
0
6
7
7
3
269.2
HI SC/3M
260.2
304.
241 .
283-
278.
6
9
4
4
NOXC
0.75
0.51
0.79
0.63
0.64
MTCE
1.04
0.54
1.00
0.78
0.77
2.26
1.72
2.45
1.98
2.03
MTCE
2.24
1.57
2.23
1.89
1.89
1.13
0.53
1.16
0.82
0.83
MTCE
1.28
/* f\
0.62
_ r\ \\
M y "i
» i
0.93
HPC
FUEL
ECOI
16.0
16.5
18.?
16.3
17.0
EFF
18.1
18.?
21.1
18.4
19.2
23.;
28.1
2?.]
25-5
26.?
EFF
21-3
27.?
f Q
26.8
21.2
, A
25-8
24.5
15 1
23-'
2?.i
, i
21.2
All Q
24..
EFF
25-'
21.1
25.)
f*J
e-16
-------
APPENDIX C.CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE
DENVER
PROCEDURE
AND AFTER
RESULTS
MAINTENANCE
VEH
NO. YR
043 75
IHC =
MAKE MODL C
TOYO CO
35 PPM
ICOtACT] = 1
ICOtSPEC]= N
INOX
OTHER
AFTER
044 75
IHC =
i
TESTS:
RO 1
ID
33
HEXANE
.1 %
/A %
29 P
CO
CO
PM
MAINTENANCE
VOLK SEDA
170 PPM
ICOtACT] - 5
ICO[SPEC]= N
INOX
OTHER
AFTER
045 75
T U /*»
=
TESTS:
MAINTENA
HEXA
.0 %
97
NE
CO
/A $CO
64 P
NCE
VOLK STAW
1HC= 130 PPM
ICOtACT] = o
T P A P n — —
ICOLS
INOX
OTHER
AFTER
PECJ= 1
HEXA
.1 %
•5 %
30 P
PM
90
NE
CO
CO
PM
TESTS:
MAINTENANCE
t
TEST TYPE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
HFET MODAL
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
HFET MODAL
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
HFET MODAL
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
HC CO
3
1
1
2
1
.09
.55
.69
.29
.91
56.9
40.4
28.9
48.3
40.7
KEYMODE LO/
3
1
1
2
1
3
2
2
3
2
.09
.37
.70
.19
.81
.62
.79
.27
.19
.82
KEYMODE
4
2
2
3
2
2
0
0
1
.03
.65
.32
.31
.84
.68
.31
.64
.45
0.89
KEYMODE
2.69
0
0
1
1
.57
.99
.58
.12
58.5
28.8
22.8
43.0
33.3
34.9
35.3
20.6
35.1
31 .2
LO/
35.1
26.3
21.4
30.5
26.8
48.3
7.8
8.5
27-2
r c, n n JL L, C.
C02
364.
339.
325.
. 1
.7
,7
351 .4
340.
.9
HI SC/3M
394.
381.
361 .
387.
378.
288.
294.
268.
291 -
285.
HI SC/
290.
301 .
272.
295.
290.
395.
406.
379.
401 .
16.3 396.
LO/HI SC/
51.2 391.
8.2
13.2
28.8
18.4
384.
369-
387.
381 .
0
7
8
6
8
0
5
0
4
9
3M
4
0
0
9
9
0
6
1
1
7
3M
0
2
6
5
6
NOXC
3.79
1 .28
3.66
2.48
2.45
MTCE
3.89
1 .42
3.95
2.60
2.62
3.53
2.39
3-54
2.94
2.94
MTCE
2.93
2.04
2.90
2.46
2.46
2. 42
1.19
2.13
1 .78
1 .70
MTCE
1 .70
1 .04
1 .79
1 .36
1 .38
f UtL
ECON
19.2
21 .7
23.6
20.4
21 .6
EFF
17-9
20.6
22.0
19-2
20.3
25 .0
24.7
28.9
24.9
25.8
EFF
24.8
25.3
28.4
25.0
26.0
18.5
21 . 1
22.5
19-8
20.9
EFF
18.5
22.2
22.6
20.3
21.4
C-17
-------
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO. YR MAKE MODL
231 75 AMMO GREM
CID
232
IHC= 180 PPM HEXANE
ICOUCT] 4.2
ICO[SPEC]= 1.0
INOX - 70
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANCE
232 75 AMMO HORN
*CO
%CO
PPM
304
IHC= 40 PPM HEXANE
ICOtACT] - 0.1
ICO[SPEC]= N/A
INOX = 53
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANCE
233 75 AMMO MATA
*CO
%CO
PPM
360
IHC= 60 PPM HEXANE
ICO[ACT] - 0.0
ICO[SPEC]= N/A
INOX = 70
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANCE
%co
%co
PPM
TEST TYPE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
GRAMS PER MILE
HC CO C02
3.
2.
1 .
2.
2.
EFF
3.
2.
1 .
2.
2.
2.
0.
0.
1 .
1 .
EFF
2.
0.
1 .
1 .
1 .
1 .
0.
0.
1 .
0. .
09
14
84
59
25
81
05
85
89
36
31
64
78
44
.
02
04
64
1 1
31
06
72
35
75
01
74
EFF
1 .
0.
0.
1 .
0.
90
34
81
09
79
55
29
27
42
34
72
28
34
49
39
40
2
7
20
11
37
3
9
19
12
27
1
9
14
9
27
2
9
14
9
.4
.7
.0
.0
• 3
.4
.3
.4
.4
.0
.0
.6
.4
.5
.6
.9
.2
.5
.8
.0
.8
.3
.9
.0
. 1
.5
. 1
.7
.2
.4
366
437
335
403
395
428
504
394
468
458
585
626
548
606
596
584
576
517
580
562
582
584
551
583
574
577
561
544
569
560
.8
.4
.8
.6
. 1
.3
.6
.5
.1
.9
.7
.0
.7
.7
.6
.3
.7
.4
.3
. 1
.0
.1
.2
.1
.7
-7
.6
.2
.3
.2
NOXC
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
6
5
7
6
6
6
5
7
5
5
.11
.07
.44
.09
.18
.57
.43
.65
.50
.52
.36
.74
.16
.04
.98
.59
.62
.82
.61
.67
.86
.75
.20
.28
.37
.60
. n
.17
n A
.09
oA
.00
— A
.99
HPG
FUEL
EC08
19.1
18.1
23.1
18.6
19.5
16.0
16.0
19.5
16.0
16.8
13-5
1U
15.8
13.6
H.i
13-&
15-2
16.6
1U
15-2
t r 1
15-1
«r (
15.6
i. L
1U
., (1
15.0
i 1
15. 1
\ J
15.8
\ j
1K.9
15-3
f /
018
-------
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
HO. YR MAKE MODL
234 75 BUIC SKYH
IHC= 140 PPM HEX
ICOUCT] 2.5
ICO[SPEC]= N/A
INOX 54
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANCE
235 75 BUIC SKYL
CID
231
ANE
$CO
%CO
PPM
260
IHC= 150 PPM HEXANE
ICOUCT] = 0.1
ICO[SPEC]= N/A
INOX = 65
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANCE
236 75 BUIC REGA
T f| «
%CO
%CO
PPM
350
JHC= 210 PPM HEXANE
ICOUCT] = 4.4 %CQ
ICO[SPEC]= N/A
T IT f\
x = 40
OTHER TESTS-
AFTER MAINTENANCE
••
%CO
PPM
TEST TYPE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP *
75 FTP
2
0
1
1
1
EF
2
0
0
1
0
4
3
2
3
3
EF
3
0
1
2
1
2
2
2
2
2
EF
2
1
1
1
1
r.
HC
.41
.53
.40
.43
. 15
F
.07
.25
.57
. 12
.71
.12
.07
.58
.57
.15
F
.48
-71
.17
.03
.40
.57
.16
.40
.36
.31
F
.17
.15
.48
.64
.45
IRAMS PER MILE
CO C02
46
10
20
27
20
36
2
6
18
10
79
59
60
69
64
66
12
26
38
27
75
55
69
65
63
57
35
41
45
41
.9
.2
.3
.8
.5
.2
.6
.7
.7
.7
.9
.9
. 1
.5
. 1
.6
.5
.9
.4
.6
.6
.9
.9
.3
.8
.8
.0
.2
.9
.4
424,
457
398,
441.
434.
423.
444.
398.
434.
427.
480.
437.
410.
458.
439.
610.
565.
471 .
586.
548.
559.
561.
489.
560.
541.
590.
614.
520.
602.
583.
.8
.2
.4
.7
,5
.3
,9
1
6
7
3
8
5
1
1
0
5
0
8
9
2
0
1
1
0
5
4
8
9
9
i
NOXC
2.54
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
1
0
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
1
.40
.77
.95
.74
.91
.29
.79
.59
.56
.52
.87
• 30
.18
. 12
.79
.89
.14
.32
.15
.51
.78
.04
.13
.00
.57
.68
.20
.10
.00
MPG
FUEL
ECON
17.5
18.7
20.4
18. 1
18.9
18.2
19.7
21.6
19.0
19.9
14.3
16.4
17.3
15.3
16. 1
12.2
15-1
17.2
13-6
14.9
12.9
13.5
14.6
13.2
13.7
12.9
13-2
15.0
13-0
13-6
C-19
-------
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO. YR MAKE MODL
238 75 BUIC STAW
CID
350
IHC= 100 PPM HEXANE
ICOCACT] - 4.8
ICO[SPEC]= N/A
INOX - 22
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANC
240 75 BUIC RIVI
%CO
%CO
PPM
E
455
IHC= 75 PPM HEXANE
ICO[ACT] = 0.2
ICO[SPEC]= N/A
INOX = 3
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANC
244 75 CHEV VEGA
%CO
%CO
PPM
E
140
IHC= 310 PPM HEXANE
ICO[ACT] = 8.4
ICO[SPEC]= N/A
INOX = 26
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANC
%CO
%CO
PPM
E
TEST TYPE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
GRAMS PER MILE
HC CO C02 NOXC
3-
2.
2.
3.
2.
EFF
2.
1 .
1 .
2.
2.
4.
3.
3-
3.
3.
EFF
3.
1 .
1 .
2.
1 .
4.
3.
2.
4.
3.
EFF
4.
2.
2.
3.
3.
75
45
44
07
71
90
92
94
39
13
01
32
61
65
54
36
36
57
32
83
46
96
74
20
73
78
89
17
79
08
84
65
56
74
66
83
53
54
67
60
108
87
107
97
97
41
5
33
22
20
87
70
51
78
69
81
41
39
60
48
.9
.0
. 1
.5
.7
.6
.5
.7
.9
.0
. 1
.8
.6
.5
.4
.7
.3
.2
.7
.4
.8
.7
.6
.9
.0
.2
.0
.5
.2
.9
590
584
539
587
573
627
635
571
631
616
678
660
577
669
641
729
732
630
730
703
304
338
283
322
316
305
335
291
320
317
.6
.2
.2
• 3
.2
.5
.4
.1
.6
.2
.4
.8
.4
.2
.6
.5
. 1
.4
.9
.8
.9
.5
. 1
.4
.5
.0
.5
.6
.9
.2
1
0
1
1
1
2
0
1
1
1
2
0
1
1
1
2
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
.46
.86
• 35
.15
.12
.42
.78
.26
.57
.25
.09
.96
.39
.50
.31
.83
.46
.76
.12
.83
.24
.22
.60
.23
.33
.14
r- 0
.58
1 A
.30
.42
HPG
FUEL
ECO«
12. 1
12. 8
11,0
12.1
12.9
11.6
12.2
13.*
11.9
52.4
10.3
11.0
11.?
10.6
11.0
11.0
11.9
12.9
11.5
12.0
19.«
1 «
? \ t V
« ^
19-3
nn 3
20-3
Q
tQ U
21-f
20-8
fc v
22J
C-20
-------
ON
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
N0. YR MAKE MODL CID
245 75 CHEV MONZ 140
IHC= 255 PPM HEXANE
ICOUCT] - 5-7 *CO
ICO[SPEC]= N/A %CO
INOX - 16 PPM
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANCE
246 75 CHEV MONZ 262
IHC= 45 PPM HEXANE
ICOUCT] = 0.1 *CO
ICO[SPEC]= N/A *CO
INOX 60 PPM
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANCE
247 75 CHEV NOVA 250
JHC= 150 pPM HEXANE
ICOUCT] 2.7 *CO
Tn/\ • » / ft fo \j \J
X = 61 PPM
OTHER TESTS-
AFTER MAINTENANCE
•
TEST TYPE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP ^
75 FTP
2
1
1
2
1
EF
1
0
0
1
1
2
0
0
1
0
EF
2
0
0
1
0
2
0
0
1
0
EF
1
0
0
0
0
HC
.65
-99
.46
.30
.98
F
• 98
.90
.88
.41
. 1 2
.28
.31
.56
.26
.78
F
.41
.43
.73
.38
.92
.12
-34
.72
.19
.81
F
.77
.08
.52
.89
.55
IRAMS PER MILE
CO C02
73
50
34
61
50
53
24
22
37
29
51
0
2
24
1 1
44
0
7
21
1 1
42
3
1 1
22
13
40
0
8
19
10
.2
.8
.3
.5
.9
. 1
.0
.2
.9
.5
.5
.4
.6
.9
.5
.7
.0
.0
.4
. 1
.5
.7
.4
.3
.8
.5
.4
.0
.6
.7
413
371
363
391
378
405
373
353
388
374
531
519
499
525
516
549
503
481
525
507
484
495
444
490
479
511
515
471
513
502
.3
.6
.6
.6
.0
.5
.2
.9
.6
.6
.3
.9
.4
.4
.7
.9
.7
.7
.8
.2
.8
.6
.4
.4
.4
.3
.5
.7
.5
.7
NOXC
1 .
0.
1 .
0.
0.
1 .
0.
1 .
1 .
0.
2.
2.
2.
2.
2.
2.
3.
2.
2.
2.
3-
2.
2.
2.
2.
2.
1 .
2.
2.
2 .
,36
54
04
93
85
52
58
15
03
93
00
41
06
21
23
57
32
39
96
91
03
65
86
83
78
17
99
29
08
1 1
MPG
FUEL
ECON
16.
19.
21 .
17.
19.
17.
21 .
22.
19.
20.
14.
17.
17.
15.
16.
14.
17.
17.
15.
16.
15.
17
19-
16.
17.
15.
17.
18.
16.
17.
.5
,4
0
9
1
9
5
7
6
9
3
0
6
6
5
1
6
9
7
8
9
7
1
8
6
3
2
3
2
0
021
-------
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO. YR MAKE MODL
248 75 CHEV NOVA
CID
262
IHC= 40 PPM HEXANE
ICOUCT] = 0.1
ICO[SPEC]= N/A
INOX - 78
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANC
249 75 CHEV CAMA
%CO
%CO
PPM
E
350
IHC= 255 PPM HEXANE
ICOUCT] - 3-7
ICO[SPEC]= N/A
INOX - 55
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANC
250 75 CHEV NOVA
56CO
$CO
PPM
E
350
IHC= 255 PPM HEXANE
ICOUCTJ s 5.8
ICO[SPEC]= N/A
INOX 4o
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANC
%CO
%CO
PPM
E
TEST TYPE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
GRAMS PER MILE
HC CO C02
3-
0.
0.
1 .
1 .
EFF
3.
0.
0.
1 .
0.
3-
1 .
2.
2.
2.
EFF
2.
0.
1 .
1 .
1 .
3-
3.
2.
3-
3
06
42
79
68
06
06
41
47
68
97
02
66
26
31
10
28
91
70
57
41
49
55
61
52
28
EFF
2.61
1 .
1 .
2.
1 .
85
63
21
95
51
0
2
24
11
55
0
2
26
12
75
47
77
60
61
58
26
62
41
42
88
123
72
106
102
60
46
34
53
46
.5
. 1
.9
.7
.4
.8
.4
.4
.9
• 3
.4
.6
.6
.9
.5
.0
.6
.6
.6
.9
.9
.2
.9
.8
.4
.0
.6
.8
.0
.2
517
539
499
528
524
542
576
525
560
555
536
548
465
543
523
542
558
467
550
530
549
517
490
532
516
573
569
523
571
557
.3
• 3
.8
.8
.0
.2
.6
.6
. 1
.6
.9
.5
.7
.0
.5
.2
.0
.2
.5
,0
.4
.5
.6
.8
.7
.1
.3
.6
.1
.6
NOXC
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
.15
•13
•23
.U
.16
• 93
.86
.92
.89
.89
.51
.01
.82
.75
.56
.62
.04
.70
.80
.54
.73
.49
.45
.08
.01
.57
.69
_ it
.2*1
1 9
. 1 f-
A O
.02
MPG
FUEL
ECON
11.6
16.D
17.5
15.5
16.3
13- f
15.3
16.?
11.6
15.1
13.3
UU
1W
13.?
11.2
13-5
1U
15-5
11.3
1U
12.!
. » <\
12-3
, 1, f
11.5
A C.
12.5
_ ft
12-9
13.'
11 1
i j.(
15.2
f J *
13-'
13-5
i j
C-22
-------
ON
APPENDIX C.CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO. YR MAKE MODL CID
252 75 CHEV MALI 350
IHC= 140 PPM HEXANE
ICOUCT] = 3-1 %CO
ICO[SPEC]= N/A $CO
INOX = 70 PPM
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANCE
253 75 CHEV MALI 350
IHC= 30 PPM HEXANE
ICOUCT] - 0.1 *CO
ICO[SPEC]= N/A *CO
INOX _ 85 PPM
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANCE
258 75 CHEV CAPR 350
IHC= 100 PPM HEXANE
ICOUCT] = -i. 6 %CQ
ICO[SPEC]= M/A *rn
INOX ->
UA - 30 PPM
°THER TESTS-
AFTER MAINTENANCE
TEST TYPE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
2
2
1
2
2
EF
2
1
1
1
1
3
2
2
2
2
EF
2
0
1
1
1
2
2
1
2
2
EF
2
1
1
1
1
r.
HC
.77
.24
.94
.49
.27
F
.16
.16
.40
.64
.43
.53
. 12
.15
.79
.42
F
.62
.88
.38
.72
.38
.80
.61
.95
.70
.47
F
.00
.13
.04
.55
.28
RAMS PER MILE
CO C02
75
59
53
67
61
56
45
44
50
47
63
38
44
50
45
54
23
35
38
33
72
77
58
75
71
60
38
38
48
42
.8
.2
• 3
. 1
.0
.5
.2
.5
.6
.4
• 9
.5
.5
.6
.3
.6
.9
.5
.6
.4
. 1
.7
. 1
.0
.2
.0
.2
.6
.6
.8
534
553
490
544
532
540
536
486
538
523
522
549
488
536
527
564
604
526
585
574
588
571
535
579
565
636
648
583
642
627
.3
.6
.2
.3
.3
.0
.7
.3
.3
.6
.4
.9
.5
.7
.5
.7
.0
.9
.2
.9
.0
.7
.8
.5
.3
.0
.0
.0
.2
.8
NOXC
1
0
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
1
0
1
0
1
1
0
.59
.93
.40
.25
.19
.06
.31
.69
.67
.57
.71
.55
.21
. 10
.97
.29
.37
.84
.81
.69
.88
.52
.22
.17
.99
.57
.53
.08
.03
.89
MPG
FUEL
ECON
13
13
15
13
14
14
14
15
14
14
14
14
15
14
14
13
13
15
13
14
12
12
14
12
13
12
12
13
12
12
.4
.6
-3
.5
.0
.0
.5
.8
.2
.7
.0
.4
.7
.2
.6
.5
.8
. 1
.6
. 1
.5
.6
.0
.6
.0
.0
c
.7
-3
.7
C-23
-------
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO. YR MAKE MODL
260 75 CHEV IMPA
IHC= 60 PPM HEX
ICOUCT] = 0.8
ICO[SPEC]= N/A
INOX - 36
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANCE
261 75 CHEV IMPA
CID
350
ANE
/tco
%CQ
PPM
350
IHC= 270 PPM HEXANE
ICOEACT] = 6.0
ICO[SPEC]= N/A
INOX - 25
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANCE
262 75 CHEV IMPA
%CO
%CO
PPM
350
IHCa 215 PPM HEXANE
ICOUCT] _ 3.5
ICO[SPEC]= N/A
INOX = 117
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANCE
%co
%co
PPM
TEST TYPE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
GRAMS PER MILE
HC CO C02
3.
2.
1 .
2.
2.
EFF
2.
0.
1 .
1 .
1 .
3-
3.
2.
3-
3-
EFF
2.
0.
1 .
1 .
1 .
4.
3-
4.
3.
3.
EFF
3.
1 .
1 .
2.
1 .
04
28
81
64
31
29
80
23
51
22
63
45
73
53
29
63
79
04
67
24
10
34
04
70
69
86
02
32
38
69
85
78
56
82
74
56
24
39
39
35
92
109
72
100
95
76
27
39
50
40
110
91*
58
102
87
116
30
47
71
52
.7
.6
.6
.0
. 1
.9
.0
.3
.7
.0
.0
. 1
.2
• 9
.5
.0
.2
.6
.6
.6
.7
.0
.1
.0
.7
.5
.3
.8
.5
.8
633
629
590
631
619
638
640
571
639
621
543
518
502
530
519
610
659
572
636
625
543
516
504
528
518
578
639
548
610
602
. 1
.2
. 1
. 1
.3
.0
.4
.4
.2
.0
.5
.3
.6
.4
.2
.5
.9
.3
-3
.8
.0
.0
.2
.9
.3
.8
.3
.3
.4
.0
NOXC
1
0
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
1
1
0
2
1
1
1
0
1
0
0
.55
.71
• 30
. 11
.01
.91
.79
.55
.32
.23
.71
.71
.11
.22
.13
.38
,12
.26
.03
.00
.98
.89
.03
.11
.13
.22
fO
. 00
r\ C
.26
A ll
.91
A C
.95
»u u
ECOK
11.1
11.7
* I
13.0
11.6
11.5
12.1
13.0
13-5
12.6
13-1
12.?
12.7
H.2
12.1
13-!
12.0
12.6
13-5
12. ]
_ rt
12.8
12.2
* n
13-2
. ii L
14.6
A 1
12.1
/ 1 3
13-5
11 5
1 !•'
12.?
12-2
12.5
C-24
-------
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO. YR MAKE MODL
263 75 CHEV CAPR
C. V J ' ~
CID
400
IHC= 25 PPM HEXANE
ICOtACT] 0.1
ICO[SPEC]= N/A
INOX - 44
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANC
264 75 CHEV IMPA
%CO
%CO
PPM
E
400
IHC= 45 PPM HEXANE
ICOtACT] 0.1
ICO[SPEC]r N/A
INOX 36
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANC
266 75 CHEV CAPR
T Li r*
%CO
%CO
PPM
E
454
IHC= 25 PPM HEXANE
ICOtACT] = o.O Crn
ICOCSPEC]. N/A
"• *• V A •• l| f™
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANC
f v \j
%co
PPM
E
TEST TYPE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
1
0
0
0
0
EF
1
0
0
1
0
3
0
0
1
1
n
HC
.48
.20
.45
.81
.53
F
.93
.18
.47
.02
.62
.03
.47
.89
.70
.1 1
EFF
2
0
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
EF
1
0
0
1
0
.92
.69
.45
.76
• 35
.74
.24
.53
.96
.63
F
.95
.24
.53
.06
.67
RAMS PER MILE
CO C02
28.
0.
7.
14.
8.
26.
0.
5.
12.
6.
76.
3.
23.
38.
23.
77.
6.
37.
40.
29.
33.
0.
12.
16.
10.
31.
0.
2.
14.
7.
9
4
2
0
1
7
0
2
8
9
1
0
5
0
6
3
4
4
3
5
5
0
2
0
2
0
1
3
9
1
695
678
600
686
660
727
694
629
710
683
754
765
683
760
741
703
744
662
724
713
774
820
713
798
781
771
824
725
799
786
.2
.4
.6
.4
.6
.8
.8
.7
.6
.8
.9
.4
.8
.3
.0
.2
.8
.6
.9
.8
.3
.3
.7
.3
.7
.9
.9
.5
.5
.9
NOXC
2.
1 .
2.
2.
2.
2.
2.
2.
2.
2.
2.
1 .
2.
1.
1 .
2.
1 .
1 .
1 .
1 .
2.
1.
2.
1.
1 .
2.
1 .
2.
2.
2.
34
,85
58
09
15
72
17
98
43
51
47
49
24
96
90
13
34
92
72
66
26
48
26
85
85
66
47
51
04
00
MPG
FUEL
ECON
11.9
13.1
14.5
12.5
13.1
11.4
12.8
13.9
12. 1
12.7
10.0
1 1.5
12.3
10.8
11.4
10.6
11.7
12.2
11 .2
11.6
10.7
10.8
12. 1
10.7
11.1
10.7
10.7
12. 1
10.7
11.1
C-25
-------
APPENDIX C.CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO. YR MAKE MODL
267 75 CHRY CORD
IHC= 140 PPM HEX
ICOUCT] - 2.7
ICO[SPEC]= 0.3
INOX - 70
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANCE
268 75 CHRY IMPE
CID
360
ANE
%CO
%CO
PPM
440
IHC=2000 PPM HEXANE
ICOUCT] - 5.0
ICO[SPEC]= 0.3
INOX = 15
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANCE
270 75 DODG DART
%CO
%CO
PPM
318
IHC= 225 PPM HEXANE
ICOUCT] = 3.1
ICO[SPEC]= N/A
INOX 45
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANCE
$CO
$CO
PPM
TEST TYPE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
GRAMS PER MILE
HC CO C02 NOXC
4 .
2.
3.
3.
3-
EFF
4.
1 .
2.
2.
2 .
5.
2.
2.
4.
3.
EFF
3.
0.
1 .
1 .
1 .
5.
4.
3.
4.
4.
65
98
1 1
77
36
29
57
35
87
34
51
68
23
03
14
32
48
61
84
37
01
30
51
64
23
EFF
2.
1 .
1 .
1 .
1 .
66
08
54
83
53
109
94
93
102
97
95
37
76
65
59
122
89
65
105
89
97
20
57
57
46
65
85
45
75
70
37
17
15
26
20
.9
.8
.0
.0
.4
.3
.3
. 1
. 1
.8
.2
.6
.7
.2
.8
.2
.5
.8
.2
.5
.7
.3
.9
.9
.5
.3
.3
.0
.9
.8
553
572
508
563
551
560
608
524
585
575
663
71 1
637
688
681
776
852
701
815
795
504
484
480
494
487
568
567
514
568
553
.2
.4
.9
.2
. 1
.9
.3
. 1
.6
.6
.5
.2
. 1
.3
.2
,2
.3
.2
.9
.4
.7
.9
.3
.4
.8
.6
.5
.8
.0
.3
2
1
2
2
2
2
1
2
2
2
2
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
2
1
1
2
1
2
1
1
• 57
.611
• 57
.09
.09
.75
.62
.81
.16
.18
.35
.17
.16
.74
.69
.87
.10
.80
.47
.45
.65
.31
.54
.95
.92
.61
f\ f\
.00
ii n
.40
7 1
.71
HPfi
FUEL
ECON
12.0
12.1
13-3
12.1
12.;
12.3
13.2
13.6
12.1
13-1
10.2
10.3
11.9
10.2
10.7
9.i
10.0
11.1
9.7
10.2
14.2
4 It fl
11.0
tf 1
15-1
. i, i
ll.l
4 N -
11-
-------
APPENDIX C.CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
N0< YR MAKE MODL
?7? 75 DODG CHAR
C l *- ' -*
CID
360
IHC= 170 PPM HEXANE
ICOtACT] = 4.3
ICO[SPEC]= N/A
INOX = 62
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANC
273 75 DODG MONA
*CO
/tco
PPM
E
400
IHC= 350 PPM HEXANE
ICOtACT] = 8.3
ICO[SPEC]= 0.3
INOX = 35
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANC
2?5 75 FORD MUST
JCO
5tCO
PPM
E
140
IHC= 45 PPM HEXANE
ICOtACT] = o.4 *CO
ICO[SPEC]= N/A
*. N U X - -> o
Jo
OTHER TESTS-
AFTER MAINTENANC
$CO
PPM
E
TEST TYPE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP %
75 FTP
(
HC
6.
3.
3-
4.
4.
42
68
73
99
26
3RAMS PER MILE
CO C02
124
87
92
104
96
.0
. 1
.9
.8
.3
493
536
457
515
505
.0
.4
.5
.6
.9
t
NOXC
2
1
1
1
1
.01
.57
• 99
.78
.77
MPG
FUEL
ECON
12.5
13-0
14.4
12.8
13.2
EFF
5.
1 .
2.
3.
2.
7-
4 .
3-
5.
4.
EFF
9-
1 .
1 .
5.
2.
2.
1 .
1 .
1 .
1 .
EFF
1 .
0.
1 .
1 .
1 .
16
49
78
25
60
1 1
23
77
61
70
38
17
40
10
92
35
30
71
80
63
58
88
20
21
1 1
77
37
71
56
54
155
148
103
151
137
148
43
42
93
64
65
25
25
44
33
53
16
18
34
24
.9
.4
.0
.8
.9
.6
.0
.0
.7
.3
. 1
.0
.8
.3
.6
.7
.7
.7
.8
.9
.7
.0
.5
. 1
.5
529
618
495
575
566
694
679
608
686
663
737
777
679
758
742
404
374
350
388
374
456
417
387
436,
417
.0
.0
.5
.4
• 3
.2
.6
.8
.6
• 3
.9
.7
.4
.7
.7
. 1
.5
.8
.7
. 1
.0
.6
-3
.0
.2
2
1
1
1
1
2
1
2
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
2
1 .
2 ,
2.
2.
2.
1 .
2.
1 .
1 .
.16
.05
.62
.58
.43
.03
.18
.18
.59
.63
.87
• 30
.56
.57
.76
.46
.73
.47
,08
09
38
51
37
93
93
13-3
13.0
14.4
13.1
13.4
9.2
9.6
11.3
9.4
9-9
8.9
10.5
11 .8
9.6
10.4
17.2
21 .2
22.4
19.1
20.5
16.3
19.9
21.1
18.0
19-3
C-27
-------
APPENDIX C.CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO. YR MAKE MODL CID
277 75 FORD MUST 171
IHC= 40 PPM HEXANE
ICOUCT] = 0.1 %CO
ICO[SPEC]= N/A %CO
INOX - 40 PPM
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANCE
281 75 FORD GRAN 302
IHC= 530 PPM HEXANE
ICO[ACT] = 8.4 %CO
ICO[SPEC]= N/A *CO
INOX 12 PPM
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANCE
282 75 FORD STAW 351
IHC= 225 PPM HEXANE
ICOUCT] = 2.2 $CO
ICO[SPEC]= N/A %CO
INOX * H6 PPM
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANCE
TEST TYPE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
H
2.
0.
1 .
1 .
1 .
EFF
1 .
0.
1 .
1 .
1 .
4.
2.
2.
3.
3.
EFF
2.
0.
1 .
1 .
1 .
1 .
0.
1 .
1 .
1 .
EFF
1 .
1 .
1 .
1 .
1 .
--G
C
91
93
48
88
49
75
72
47
22
14
66
71
46
64
04
05
90
25
45
24
69
97
15
32
17
54
19
17
36
26
RAM,
Ci
37
16
18
26
21
25
8
13
16
13
44
44
24
44
39
16
1
6
8
5
61
33
43
47
42
65
26
42
45
39
S P
0
.1
.2
.8
.2
.2
.7
.8
.4
.9
.5
.2
.8
.8
.5
.2
.6
.4
.4
.7
.9
.4
.9
.6
. 1
.2
.5
.5
.9
.2
.0
ER M
CO
478
535
431
508
495
482
538
441
511
500
592
613
557
603
594
632
616
555
624
603
771
774
689
773
750
759
753
655
756
728
ILE
2
.8
,2
.6
.2
.3
.4
.0
.8
.4
.3
.4
.9
.7
.7
.2
.2
.5
.1
.0
.0
.9
.6
.3
.3
.8
.3
.7
.8
.4
.2
N
2
1
2
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
2
1
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
oxc
.11
• 33
.08
.70
.69
.03
.46
.87
.73
.69
.32
.75
.54
.02
.08
.42
.71
.80
.57
.67
.77
.96
.69
.35
.33
.70
1^
. 3
it i
.73
ii f\
.40
ii 1
.** i
H
PO
EC
16
15
19
16
16
16
16
19
16
16
13
12
111
13
13
13
11
15
13
h
11
10
10
. A
10
. f\
10
1(1
|v
11
1 1
12
1 fc
10
11
PS
EL
01
.2
1
• I
.1
.0
.6
.8
.0
.0
A
,9
.1
.8
.!
,0
.}
i
.]
.i
I
.1
.2
1
.1
7
,1
i
,1
5
,0
.2
.1
.2
.?
,2
028
-------
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VFH
HO. YR MAKE MODL CID
284 75 FORD TORI 40°
IHCs 25 PPM HEXANE
ICOUCT] = 1 .3 %CO
ICO[SPEC]= N/A %CO
INOX - 55 PPM
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANCE
285 75 FORD LTD 351
IHC= 195 PPM HEXANE
ICO[ACT] = 3.9 %CO
ICO[SPEC]= N/A *CO
INOX = 59 PPM
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANCE
286 75 FORD ELIT 351
T U rt
JHC= 100 PPM HEXANE
ICOUCT] - 1 3 JCO
««».«. ,,2$
HUA = 60 PPM
OTHER TESTS-
ApTER MAINTENANCE
TEST TYPE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP >
75 FTP
t
HC
1 .
1 .
1 .
1 .
1 .
50
13
03
31
18
3RAMS PER MILE
CO C02
31
28
19
29
26
.0
.4
.6
.6
.5
751
749
659
750
725
.6
.0
.2
.2
.0
NOXC
3
1
2
2
2
.16
.63
.85
.36
.27
MPG
FUEL
ECON
1 1
1 1
12
1 1
11
.0
.1
.8
.1
.5
EFF
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
4.
3.
3.
3-
3-
EFF
3-
1 .
1 .
2.
2.
5-
3.
3.
4.
3.
EFF
1 .
1 .
0.
1 .
1 .
98
73
83
85
81
33
56
58
93
72
68
51
87
55
06
36
19
39
23
69
80
14
98
46
23
25
17
23
21
20
90
98
77
9^
91
63
33
60
47
46
146
85
104
114
103
55
21
40
38
3^
.5
.8
.0
.5
.8
.9
. 1
.5
.6
.0
.4
. 1
.0
.6
.7
.7
.6
.3
.9
.3
.6
.9
.8
.0
.0
818
833
713
826
797
605
616
544
611
594
735
762
640
750
724
585
627
550
607
597
735
755
673
746
729
.3
.6
-3
• 3
.6
.0
.7
.2
. 1
.5
.9
.9
.7
.0
.0
.6
.3
.0
.4
.6
.8
.6
• 3
. 1
. 1
1
1
1
1
1
2
0
2
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1 ,
.86
-31
.75
.57
.54
• 38
.95
.52
.63
.67
.30
.15
.98
.70
.61
.57
.33
.38
.44
.39
.50
.79
.50
.65
.65
10
10
1 1
10
10
1 1
1 1
13
1 1
1 1
10
10
12
10
11
10
11
12
1 1
1 1
10
1 1
12
1 1
1 1
.3
• 3
.8
.3
.7
.7
.3
. 1
.5
.8
.5
.8
.0
.7
.0
.7
.5
.2
.1
.5
.7
.2
.0
.0
.3
C-29
-------
APPENDIX C.CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO. YR
287 75
IHC =
ICO[A
MAKE MODL
FORD LTD
30 PPM HEX
CT] 0.8
CID
351
ANE
$CO
ICO[SPEC]= N/A %CO
INOX
OTHER
AFTER
288 75
IHC =
ICO[A
48
TESTS:
MAINTENANCE
FORD TORI
PPM
351
400 PPM HEXANE
CT] 9.6
?CO
ICO[SPEC]= N/A %CO
INOX
OTHER
AFTER
289 75
IHC =
ICOCA
22
TESTS:
MAINTENANCE
FORD LTD
PPM
400
600 PPM HEXANE
CT] = 10.0
ICO[SPEC]= N/A
INOX
OTHER
AFTER
17
TESTS :
MAINTENANCE
%CO
%CO
PPM
TEST TYPE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
GRAMS
HC CO
1 .
0.
1 .
1 .
1 .
EFF
2.
0 .
1 .
1 .
1 .
5.
4.
3.
5.
4.
EFF
4.
2.
2.
3-
2.
13.
9.
12.
1 1 .
1 1 .
EFF
2.
1 .
1 .
1 .
1 .
59
92
27
24
16
19
82
22
48
21
87
25
69
03
43
23
56
68
36
94
65
87
46
68
35
48
23
36
83
52
34.
24.
26.
29.
27.
41 .
25.
31.
33.
30.
122.
132.
97.
127-
120.
95.
57.
58.
75.
65.
323.
292.
300.
307.
301 .
96.
41 .
54.
68.
56.
PER MILE
C02
5
5
9
3
2
7
7
3
4
5
5
5
5
8
9
1
8
4
6
6
7
9
5
6
3
4
9
6
0
6
712
71 1
628
711
688
741
758
669
750
730
608
595
556
601
587
647
721
609
685
675
632
625
545
628
605
834
867
738
851
825
.8
. 1
.7
.9
.9
.6
.8
.0
.6
.8
.9
.4
.3
.8
.5
.4
. 1
.2
.8
.4
. 1
.9
.0
.9
. 1
.8
.3
.5
.7
.5
NOXC
2.5H
1.28
2.56
1.88
1 .89
2.19
1.15
2.09
1.65
1.62
2.26
1.01
2.3^
1.61
1.63
2.86
0.97
2.2?
1.88
1.72
0.67
0.60
0.59
0.63
0.61
0.81
n n
0.77
Q C
0.85
A 1 f\
0.79
00 A
. ou
Of u
FUEL
ECOK
11.5
1 * J
11,8
13-1
1U
12.1
10,5
11.1
12.3
11,0
11.3
10,8
10.?
12.3
10,8
11,2
11J
10. «
12,5
10. 9
U5
.3
7.5
7 0
(•'
g I
0.'
i 7
/.I
8n
.i-
8 9
Q *'
9.5
7
ifl.l
1 *
9J
C-30
-------
APPENDIX C.CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
N0. YR MAKE MODL CID
290 75 FORD LTD 400
IHC= 45 PPM HEXANE
ICOtACT] 1 -0 %CO
ICOtSPEC]= N/A %CQ
INOX = 36 PPM
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANCE
293 75 FORD LTD 460
IHC= 75 PPM HEXANE
ICOtACT] 2.2 %CO
ICO[SPEC]= N/A *CO
INOX - 35 PPM
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANCE
2911 75 LINC CONT 460
IHC= 35 PPM HEXANE
ICO[ACT] ^ 1 9 SCO
lCOtSPEC]= N/l I™
INQY , n
UA - 48 PPM
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANCE
•*
TEST TYPE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
GRAMS PER MILE
HC CO C02
2
1
1
1
1
EF
1
0
1
0
0
4
2
2
3
2
1 1
.07
.47
.57
.39
F
.59
.44
. 15
.99
.87
.57
.29
.38
.38
.78
63
39
47
50
46
83
34
53
57
49
85
94
51
90
80
.7
. 1
.8
.9
.5
.4
.6
• 3
.9
.7
.8
.3
-3
.2
.8
790
763
700
776
751
997
1035
862
1017
980
764
777
684
771 ,
749-
.2
.3
.0
. 1
.5
.0
.8
.5
• 3
.6
.2
.8
.2
• 3
,5
i
NOXC
1
I .55
0.85
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
0
2
1
1
.25
.19
.10
.1 1
.03
.08
.07
.06
.68
.96
.35
.78
.69
MPG
FUEL
ECON
9.
10.
1 1 .
10.
10.
7.
8.
9.
8.
8.
9-
9.
1 1 .
9.
10.
,9
. 7
4
3
7
8
1
3
0
4
7
5
5
6
0
EFF
2
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
EF
1
0
1
1
1
.75
.44
.70
.07
.78
.71
.00
.60
• 34
• 31
F
.61
.94
.71
.26
.29
57
29
22
42
33
40
36
29
38
35
32
33
26
33
31
.0
.4
.0
.6
. 1
.0
.6
.2
.2
.3
.9
.9
.2
.4
.6
747-
765.
667.
756.
735-
847.
865.
758.
856.
832.
847.
836.
753-
841 .
816.
,2
7
0
8
0
5
4
1
9
5
6
4
3
8
1
2
1
2
1
1
2
1
2
1
1
2
1
2
1
1
.40
.29
.57
.82
.87
.39
.09
.05
.71
.62
.41
.05
.34
.70
.68
10.
10.
12.
10.
1 1 .
9-
9-
1 1 .
9.
9.
9.
9.
1 1 .
9.
10.
5
9
6
7
2
7
6
0
6
9
8
9
1
9
2
C-31
-------
APPENDIX C.CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO. YR MAKE MODL
295 75 MERC MONA
IHC= 240 PPM
ICOCACT]
ICO[SPEC]=
INOX
OTHER TESTS:
CID
302
HEXANE
5.0
N/A
38
AFTER MAINTENANC
297 75 MERC MONT
IHC= 15 PPM
ICOUCT] =
ICO[SPEC]=
INOX
OTHER TESTS:
%CO
%CO
PPM
E
351
HEXANE
0.2
N/A
46
AFTER MAINTENANC
298 75 MERC C
IHC= 50 PPM
ICOCACT]
ICO[SPEC]=
INOX
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTEN
OUG
HE
0.7
N/A
51
ANC
%CO
%CQ
PPM
E
351
XANE
%co
%co
PPM
E
TEST TYPE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
G
HC
3-
0.
1 .
1 .
1 .
EFF
2.
0.
1 .
1 .
1 .
1 .
1 .
1 .
1 .
1 .
EFF
1 .
1 .
1 .
1 .
1 .
3.
1 .
1 .
2.
1 . .
15
71
29
88
37
90
69
31
75
32
35
07
07
21
13
77
28
15
51
34
00
55
90
24
94
EFF
2.
1 .
1 .
1 .
1 .
62
36
20
97
58
RAMS PER MILE
CO C02 NOXC
62
32
33
46
39
58
14
33
35
28
32
31
30
32
31
35
32
30
33
32
47
50
40
49
47
39
20
27
29
26
.8
.3
.9
.9
.0
.7
.2
.2
.5
.5
.5
.5
.9
.0
.5
.2
.7
.7
.9
.7
.8
.3
.0
. 1
.0
. 1
.2
.6
.3
.1
594
633
547
614
602
578
621
547
600
592
610
688
612
650
651
724
705
629
714
688
710
657
616
682
657
839
803
734
820
791
• 7
.5
.9
• 9
.2
.0
.6
.2
.7
.3
. 1
. 1
. 1
.7
.3
.2
.3
.4
.4
.5
. 1
.8
.7
.8
.3
.1
. 1
.2
.3
.7
0.65
0.43
0.69
0.53
0.54
0.72
0.63
0.66
0.67
0.66
1.97
1.12
2.16
1.53
1.58
3-13
1.42
2.92
2.24
2.18
3.22
1.57
2.78
2.36
2.24
y h
2.64
ft C
2.05
y. 1| 0
O H /
-. *J 0
2.33
„ tl
2-27
HPG
FUEL
ECOH
12. 6
12.5
R?
12.8
13.3
13.1
13. '
11.?
13."
13.8
13.3
12.;
1].-
12.6
12. c
11.3
11.
13.0
11.5
11.5
11.2
12. C
M.i
,
11.:
.
12.'
flj
10.6
| V •
11. ;
ID-'
C-32
-------
APPENDIX C.CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO. YR MAKE MODL CID
300 75 OLDS OMEG 260
IHC= 85 PPM HEXANE
ICOUCT] 0.1 *CO
ICO[SPEC]= N/A *CO
INOX 1 13 PPM
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANCE
303 75 OLDS STAW 350
IHC= 960 PPM HEXANE
ICO[ACT] = 8.0 *CO
ICO[SPEC]= N/A %CO
INOX = 7 PPM
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANCE
3°7 75 PLYM DUST 225
JHC= 170 PPM HEXANE
icoucT] = 4.3 £CO
ICO[SPEC]= 0.3 %CQ
NOX = 49 PPM
OTHER TESTS-
AFTER MAINTENANCE
TEST TYPE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP -
75 FTP
3
1
1
2
2
EF
3
1
1
2
1
4
4
3
4
4
EF
2
0
1
1
1
2
1
1
2
1
EF
2
0
0
1
1
r.
HC
.68
.63
.97
.61
. 1 4
F
.65
.27
.51
. 4 1
.83
.81
. 1 1
.47
.45
.08
F
.57
.76
.64
.63
.37
.43
.92
.75
.16
.98
F
.21
.85
.93
.51
.15
'.RAMS PER MILE
CO C02
96
47
56
70
59
91
37
46
63
50
74
73
70
74
72
52
21
44
36
34
55
51
38
53
48
48
23
29
35
30
.6
.2
.6
.8
.9
.9
.3
.0
.4
.9
.4
.7
. 1
.0
.9
.7
.2
.4
.3
.0
.9
.6
.5
.7
.9
.6
.5
. 1
.6
.2
543
556
494
549
536
558
559
494
559
541
551
502
483
525
507
622
598
545
609
589
440
393
395
416
403
467
453
428
460
449
.3
.0
.4
.9
.6
.6
.9
.0
.3
.7
.0
.4
.0
.7
. 1
• 3
.5
.5
.9
.0
.8
.6
.0
.2
.7
. 1
.6
.0
. 1
.4
i
NOXC
2.07
1
2
1
1
2
0
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
1
1
0
1
0
0
2
1
2
2
2
2
1 ,
1
1
1 ,
.02
.01
.52
.51
.04
.84
.36
.41
.23
• 32
.92
.24
. 1 1
.09
.18
.69
.06
.92
.89
-91
.79
.26
.33
.15
.03
. 12
.59
.55
.43
MPG
FUEL
ECON
12
14.
15.
13.
13-
12.
14.
15.
13.
14.
13-
14.
14.
13-
14.
12.
14.
14.
13-
13-
16.
18.
19.
17.
18.
16.
18.
18.
17.
17-
.6
.0
. 1
.3
.9
.4
3
5
3
1
0
1
7
5
0
4
0
3
2
7
5
5
2
5
2
1
0
6
0
7
C-33
-------
APPENDIX C.CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO. YR MAKE MODL C
308 75 PLYM SCAM 3
IHC= 30 PPM
ICOUCT] - 0
ICO[SPEC]= 0
INOX
OTHER TESTS:
HEXA
.1 %
.3 %
45 P
ID
18
NE
CO
CO
PM
AFTER MAINTENANCE
309 75 PLYM VA
IHC= 240 PPM
ICOUCT] = 10
ICO[SPEC]= 0
INOX
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENA
LI 3
HEXA
.0 %
• 3 %
50 P
NCE
310 75 PLYM FURY 3
IHC= 75 PPM
ICOUCT] = 5
ICO[SPEC]= 0
INOX
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENA
HEXA
• 4 %
• 3 %
18
NE
CO
CO
PM
18
NE
CO
CO
TEST TYPE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
GRAMS PER MILE
HC CO C02
1
0
1
0
0
EF
2
0
0
1
0
2
1
1
1
1
EF
1
0
0
1
0
10
4
3
7
.44
.42
.06
.91
.80
F
.50
.40
.87
.41
.96
.15
.50
.50
.81
.63
F
.65
.74
.87
.18
.96
.20
.96
.21
.47
30 PPM
NCE
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
5
EF
9
1
1
5
2
.56
F
.45
.28
.02
.19
.89
25
13
1 1
19
15
43
15
10
28
19
50
60
31
55
50
27
24
1 1
25
21
187
90
45
136
98
187
22
12
101
53
.0
.8
.6
.2
.5
.8
. 1
.6
.8
.8
.5
.0
.8
.4
.3
.5
. 1
. 1
.8
.3
.4
.4
.5
.8
.1
.0
.9
.9
.4
.9
648
599
543
622
594
619
619
552
619
601
586
561
518
573
555
594
572
533
582
566
482
507
515
495
504
513
590
542
553
561
.7
. 1
.8
.8
.2
.2
• 3
.9
.3
.2
.8
.6
.7
.7
. 1
.2
.3
.7
.8
.3
.2
.0
.9
.2
.3
.5
.9
. H
.8
.7
NOXC
2.24
0.48
1.53
1.32
1.13
1.13
0.32
1.46
0.71
0.80
1.62
0.43
1.61
1.00
1.00
1.91
0.45
1.81
1.15
1.12
1.03
1.08
2.21
1.05
1.37
0.99
0.84
2.19
0.91
- ii
1 .24
HPG
FUEL
ECON
12.8
15.7
13.5
It. 3
12.8
13.;
15.5
13.3
11.0
13.2
13- l
15.5
13.3
13. <
13.3
11.5
16.0
11.2
11.1
11.0
i h
13-'
ill 0
11. j
+ rt 1
12.1
4 1 1
13-'
in fi
1 U-"
15.7
1 J '
12.2
| L. •
13-5
i J
C-34
-------
ON
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO. YR MAKE MODL
cm 75 PLYM FURY
mf
CID
360
IHC= 180 PPM HEXANE
ICOtACT] 4.2
ICOtSPEC]= 0.3
INOX 56
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANC
312 75 PLYM FURY
%CO
%CO
PPM
E
400
IHC= 300 PPM HEXANE
ICOtACT] - 5.0
ICO[SPEC]= 0.3
INOX = 58
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANC
313 75 PLYM FURY
%CO
%CO
PPM
E
360
IHC= 230 PPM HEXANE
ICOtACT] = 11 2 «™
ICO[SPEC]= Q' •*
T 1 1 f\ *. " J
1 NO A I. _
" u A - Jj e
OTHER TESTS-
AFTER MAINTENANC
F* \* \J
PPM
E
TEST TYPE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP -
75 FTP
(
HC
4.
3.
3.
3-
3.
EFF
3.
1 .
2.
2.
2.
8.
4.
4.
6.
5.
EFF
10.
3.
3.
7.
5.
4.
2.
3.
3.
3-
EFF
4.
1 .
2.
2.
1 .
57
03
30
77
42
77
72
65
70
39
27
46
37
28
22
71
72
68
07
15
51
40
02
41
00
24
01
13
55
98
3RAMS PER MILE
CO C02
122.9
82
98
102
95
104
38
93
69
66
1 18
76
85
96
87
127
77
78
101
87
92
60
75
75
71
1 10
29
76
68
58
.8
.0
.0
.2
.2
.3
.3
.8
.8
.8
. 1
.4
.5
.4
.2
. 1
.7
. 1
.8
.8
.5
.2
.9
. 1
.8
.2
.6
.2
.9
514.
562.
475.
539-
529-
546.
621 .
502.
585.
573-
610.
617.
570.
614.
603.
627.
655-
593-
642.
632.
554.
574.
500.
564.
550.
601 .
654.
546.
629.
614.
• 3
,8
3
6
0
0
6
6
5
6
4
4
7
0
2
8
2
4
1
7
1
5
8
7
2
9
6
5
4
3
NOXC
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
1
.48
.20
.74
• 33
.40
.48
.91
-32
.18
.14
.44
.46
.87
.93
.77
.67
.99
.45
• 32
.26
.96
.02
.83
.47
.44
• 33
.88
.26
.10
.08
MPG
FUEL
ECON
12.3
12.6
13-9
12.5
12.9
12.3
12.9
13-5
12.6
12.9
10.8
11.8
12.3
11.3
1 1.7
10.3
1 1 -3
12.2
10.8
11.3
12.4
13.1
14.1
12.8
13-2
11.2
12.6
13-2
1 1 -9
12.4
C-35
-------
ON
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST
INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE
DENVER
PROCEDURE
AND AFTER
RESULTS
MAINTENANCE
VEH
NO. YR MAKE MODL CID
314 75 PONT ASTR 140
IHC= 220 PPM HEXANE
ICOUCT] = 8.8 *CO
ICO[SPEC]= N/A $CO
INOX = 20 PPM
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANCE
316 75 PONT LEMA 350
IHC= 200 PPM HEXANE
ICOUCT] = 4.8 %CO
ICO[SPEC]= N/A %CO
INOX 58 PPM
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANCE
318 75 PONT LEMA 350
IHC= 50 PPM HEXANE
ICOUCT] _ 0.0 *CO
ICO[SPEC]= N/A %CO
INOX . 80 PPM
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANCE
TEST TYPE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
H
7.
3.
2.
5.
3.
EFF
3.
0.
1 .
2.
1 .
4.
0.
1 .
2.
1 .
EFF
4.
0.
1 .
2.
1 .
2.
0.
0.
1 .
0.
EFF
2.
0.
0-
1 .
1 .
— G
C
04
50
52
20
96
31
87
07
04
43
36
97
52
59
82
39
71
35
47
64
14
32
62
19
78
92
46
94
64
10
;RAM,
Ci
127
1 10
78
118
105
89
26
30
56
40
95
29
42
61
46
84
21
39
51
39
48
1
9
24
13
54
4
12
28
16
S P
0
.5
.6
.7
.7
.4
.5
.9
.7
.9
.9
.5
.9
.7
.3
.9
. 1
.6
.0
.5
.2
.2
.7
.6
.0
.4
.8
.3
.3
.4
.9
ER M
CO
341
313
306
326
317
383
403
357
393
386
565
622
532
595
586
578
615
535
597
586
617
625
538
621
600
570
579
511
575
559
ILE
2
. 1
.8
.7
.8
.5
.0
. 1
-7
.5
.6
.8
.8
.2
.5
.4
.0
.6
.5
.6
.0
. 1
.5
.9
.5
. 1
.7
.2
.9
.1
.1
N
1
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
5
5
5
5
5
i»
4
5
4
5
oxc
.07
.44
.00
.74
• 73
.16
.42
.71
.77
.65
.73
.15
.65
.43
.41
.63
.14
.4?
.38
.33
.01
.77
.92
.41
.65
n 1
.73
f\ A
.83
1 0
.72
A A
.02
Hi
Flli
EC(
15,
17,
20,
16.
17.
16.
19.
21.
18.
19.
12.
13.
11.
12.
13.
12.
13.
11.
12,
13.'
12.'
. ii
11.
<£ 1
16. i
i 1
13-'
1)1 I
11.'
;
15. '
1 J '
!«''
15-1
i /
'G
!L
111
,7
1 I
,8
,2
,8
9
1
8
?
1
5
2
I
1
'
3
}
i
A
1
I
\
]
)
\
1
1
)
1
1
C-36
-------
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO. YR MAKE MODL
3,20 75 PONT STAW
J *~
CID
400
IHC= 40 PPM HEXANE
ICOUCT] - 0.0
ICO[SPEC]= N/A
INOX = 69
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANC
321 75 PONT GRNV
%co
%co
PPM
E
455
IHC= 20 PPM HEXANE
ICOtACT] = 0.1
ICO[SPEC]= N/A
INOX = 53
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANC
322 75 AUDI FOX
T U o
*CO
%CO
PPM
E
97
1HC= 90 PPM HEXANE
ICO[ACT] _ 02
JCOtSPEC]^ I'Q
INOX = 30
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANC
*
f r*n
%CO
PPM
E
TEST TYPE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP %
75 FTP
2
0
1
1
1
EF
4
0
2
2
1
3
0
1
1
1
EF
2
0
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
HC
.94
.55
.89
.69
.41
F
.32
.92
.22
.55
.98
.16
.76
.35
.91
.42
F
.52
.58
.15
.51
.14
.08
.49
.60
.77
1 .64
EFF
2.24
1
1
2
1
.81
.70
.01
.87
}RAMS PER MILE
CO C02
91
22
71
55
50
123
30
82
75
63
81
32
40
56
44
63
26
39
44
37
16
5
9
10
8
15
3
4
9
6
.7
.0
.8
.4
.0
.3
.8
.3
.0
.9
.7
.4
.4
.0
.7
.6
.4
.6
.2
.6
.3
.2
.5
.5
.6
.5
.8
.8
.4
.5
670
695
599
683
664
663
693
603
679
662
738
747
660
743
722
755
768
669
762
738
343
393
310
369
360
359
404
322
383
373
.5
• 3
.4
.4
.0
.4
.4
.5
.0
.7
.8
.4
.9
• 3
.0
.7
.9
.0
.6
.9
.2
.4
.6
.4
.5
.5
.6
.8
.0
.0
NOXC
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
1
0
0
1
0
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
1
.62
.65
.69
.64
.66
.67
.18
.42
.41
.34
.35
.60
.32
.96
.95
.30
.80
.41
.04
.07
.61
.89
.36
.23
.17
.88
.93
.70
-38
.33
MPG
FUEL
ECON
10.8
12.1
12.4
11 .4
11 .9
10.2
11.9
12.0
11 .0
11 .5
10. 1
11.1
12.2
10.6
11.1
10.3
10.9
12. 1
10.6
11.1
23-6
21.8
26.8
22.7
23-4
22.7
21 .3
26.4
22.0
22.8
C-37
-------
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE
DENVER
PROCEDURE
AND AFTER
RESULTS
MAINTENANCE
VEH
NO. YR MAKE MODL
323 76 CAPR GHIA
IHC= 200 PPM
ICO[ACT] -
ICO[SPEC]=
INOX
OTHER TESTS:
CID
171
HEXANE
6.5
N/A
78
AFTER MAINTENANC
325 75 COLT SEDA
IHC= 70 PPM
ICO[ACT] -
ICO[SPEC]=
INOX
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTEN
326 75 DATS 7
IHC= 95 PPM
ICOtACT] =
ICO[SPEC]=
INOX
OTHER TESTS:
%CO
%CO
PPM
E
98
HEXANE
3-1
3-0
36
ANC
10
JCO
%CO
PPM
E
119
HEXANE
1 .4
2.0
42
AFTER MAINTENANC
%CO
%CQ
PPM
E
TEST TYPE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
G
HC
3-
2 .
1 .
3.
2.
EFF
2.
0.
0.
1 .
1 .
3.
2.
3.
3.
2.
EFF
3-
1 .
4.
2.
2.
2.
2.
2.
2.
2.
EFF
3-
3.
3.
3-
3.
27
88
1 1
07
48
82
51
86
61
08
97
1 1
10
00
76
82
61
28
67
79
84
1 1
83
46
46
24
47
05
36
31
RAMS
CO
49.
98.
16.
75.
66.
49.
5.
12.
26.
16.
65.
44.
42.
54.
48.
68.
35.
61 .
51 .
49.
56.
43.
45.
49.
46.
50.
40.
40.
45.
42.
PER MILE
C02
4
5
8
0
1
9
6
1
8
5
2
2
8
3
2
2
3
5
1
2
2
3
4
5
5
8
0
3
2
3
491
427
471
458
453
488
573
481
533
531
401
443
360
423
411
380
434
323
408
393
329
338
298
334
325
343
349
300
346
335
.6
.8
.9
.3
.0
.6
.8
.8
.0
.2
.6
. 1
.0
.2
.9
.5
.4
.5
.6
.0
.3
.8
.6
.2
.9
.0
.9
.5
.6
.0
NOXC
1.19
0.61
1.05
1.03
0.91
1.30
0.65
1.00
0.96
0.88
1.22
0.75
1.23
0.98
0.98
1.23
0.85
1.06
1.03
0.99
2.21
1.35
2.19
1.76
1.84
2.00
A C
1 .15
. n rt
1 .89
r- r
1 .55
A Ct
1 .52
HPG
FUEL
BCOI
15 ]
j>i
15 o
J i W
17.1
15.1
15.1
15.;
15.2
17.6
15.]
15.8
17.2
17.1
20.]
17.1
17.5
17.8
17-5
20.5
_ n
17.8
n f
18.5
20.8
nl C
21.5
10 k
23-'
«1 1
2l.i
11 H
21.°
5(1 5
iv->
20.5
23-8
t. J
20.'
fr "
21-5
C-38
-------
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO. YR MAKE MODL
327 75 DATS B210
IHC= 120 PPM HEX
ICOCACT] - 1.4
ICO[SPEC]= 2.0
INOX - 51
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANCE
328 75 DATS SEDA
CID
85
ANE
%CQ
%CO
PPM
119
IHC= 85 PPM HEXANE
ICOCACT] = 1.7
ICO[SPEC]= 2.0
INOX = 48
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANCE
329 75 FIAT STAW
%CQ
%co
PPM
78
JHC=2000 PPM HEXANE
icoucT] = 9.4
L O Zr d I* i» M / A
INOX
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANCE
.
%CO
%CO
PPM
TEST TYPE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP^
75 FTP
HC CO C02 NOXC
2.
1 .
2.
1 .
1 .
40
57
12
96
89
37
27
25
32
29
.4
.6
. 1
.3
.0
292
309
264
301
293
.5
.8
.6
.5
.9
2
1
2
1
1
.47
.06
• 30
.73
.69
f UC.L
ECON
24.7
24.8
28.6
24.8
25.7
EFF
2.
1 .
1 .
1 .
1 .
2.
2.
2.
2.
2.
EFF
2.
1 .
1 .
2.
1 .
3.
1 .
2.
2.
2.
EFF
2.
1 .
1 .
1 .
1 .
36
55
82
94
79
81
04
05
41
20
50
71
57
09
83
12
77
1 1
42
14
46
56
72
99
79
38
25
24
31
27
75
40
39
56
47
73
36
40
54
45
83
34
43
57
47
46
19
25
32
26
.7
.2
. 1
.7
.7
.0
.4
.8
.9
.4
.0
.9
.3
.2
.3
.3
.3
.8
.7
.0
.3
.6
.8
.4
.8
297
327
275
313
307
373
326
326
349
336
413
349
350
380
362
324
342
297
334
326
407
433
358
421
407
.7
.8
.5
.4
.3
.4
.6
.2
.0
.2
.7
.4
.0
. 1
.8
.8
.3
.8
.0
.6
.4
.5
.7
.0
.7
2
1
2
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
2
3
6,
3-
4.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
.64
.18
.55
.87
.85
.05
.02
.39
.04
.13
.52
.43
.63
.47
.50
.77
.45
.33
.13
10
67
76
87
72
77
24.2
23-8
27.8
24.0
24.9
17.7
22.4
22.5
19.9
21 .3
16.5
21 .5
21 .2
18.8
20.2
19.1
22. 1
23-8
20.5
21 .8
18.2
18.9
21.9
18.6
19-5
C-39
-------
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO. YR
330 75
IHC =
ICO[A
MAKE MO
FIAT XI
25 PPM
CT] 0
ICO[SPEC]= 3
INOX
OTHER
AFTER
331 75
IHC =
ICOU
TESTS:
DL CID
-9 79
HEXANE
. 1 %CQ
.5 %CO
65 PPM
MAINTENANCE
HOND CVCC 91
260 PPM
CT] - 1
ICO[SPEC]= 0
INOX
OTHER
AFTER
332 75
IHC =
= 1
TESTS:
MAINTENA
MAZD RX
0 PPM
ICOUCT] = 0
ICO[SPEC]= 0
INOX
OTHER
AFTER
-
TESTS:
MAINTENA
HEXANE
.9 %CO
.4 $CO
31 PPM
NCE
3 70
HEXANE
.0 ?CO
. 1 %CO
29 PPM
NCE
TEST TYPE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
G
HC
2.00
0.31
0.72
1.11
0.77
EFF
1 .60
0.30
0.58
0.93
0.65
2.92
1 .39
1 .48
2.12
1 .73
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
4.29
0.12
1 .81
2. 12
1 .44
EFF
6.80
0.64
4.27
3-59
2.90
RAMS
CO
36.
10.
24.
23-
19.
32.
8.
19.
20.
16.
18.
12.
9.
15.
12.
28.
4.
11 .
16.
1 1 .
29-
6.
16.
17-
14.
PE
9
3
2
0
5
5
8
9
2
7
2
4
4
2
8
6
7
0
1
3
7
7
4
7
0
R MI
C02
396.
414.
342.
405.
391.
384.
407.
348.
396.
386.
288.
303-
254.
296.
287.
658.
714.
564.
688.
662.
521.
655.
500.
591-
585.
LE-
2
8
3
9
2
5
8
7
6
9
6
7
1
5
0
7
9
9
0
4
7
9
6
7
9
NOXC
2
1
1
1
1
2
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.2?
.10
.80
.66
.53
.50
.42
.29
.91
.88
.63
.17
.96
• 39
.48
.81
.45
.80
.64
.63
.80
r* f\
.50
o C.
.86
f r
.65
(.(.
, oo
HPG
FUEL
EC01
!9.3
* j
20.5
* j
23.2
19.?
20.}
20.1
21. C
23.2
20.i
2U
27.2
27.1
32.*
27.1
28.*
12.<
. • i
12.'
*r \
15.'
.1 3
12- 3
ti ii
IP
i? C
!?•"
n.3
i j
10-*
i v
'ii.i
i>.'
C-40
-------
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE
DENVER
PROCEDURE
AND AFTER
RESULTS
MAINTENANCE
VEH
N0. YR MAKE MODL
333 75 MAZD RX3
CID
70
IHC= 10 PPM HEXANE
ICOUCT] - 0.0
ICO[SPEC]= 0.1
INOX - 28
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANC
335 75 MG MGB
%CO
%CO
PPM
E
1 10
IHC= 20 PPM HEXANE
ICO[ACT] = 1.0
ICO[SPEC]= 6.5
INOX = 70
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANC
336 75 OPEL STAW
T F t f\
%CO
%CO
PPM
E
116
1HO= 85 PPM HEXANE
ico [ACT] = p g
ICO[SPEC]= N/A
T hi r\ \»
INOX - QQ
OTHER TESTS-
AFTER MAINTENANC
$CO
%CQ
PPM
E
TEST TYPE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP -
75 FTP
r.
HC
7.
0.
1 1 .
3-
4.
EFF
5.
0.
1 .
2.
1 .
1 .
0.
0.
0.
0.
EFF
1 .
0.
1 .
1 .
0.
3.
2.
2.
3.
2.
EFF
3-
1 .
2.
2.
2.
28
28
19
63
70
69
31
77
89
82
22
51
84
85
75
58
52
26
03
94
90
18
33
00
57
48
82
10
61
24
RAMS PER MILE
CO C02
38
5
71
21
30
36
10
18
22
17
29
14
27
21
21
38
19
33
28
27
50
50
45
50
49
41
31
33
36
33
.2
.4
.8
. 1
.2
.0
. 1
.6
.5
.8
.2
.7
.3
.6
.1
.3
.7
.3
.6
.3
.0
.5
.7
.2
. 1
.2
.2
.0
.0
.7
943
1206
743
1080
1026
587
696
563
644
637
450
486
388
469
452
446
499
403
473
462
425
388
356
406
387
447
411
374
428
408
.6
.8
.7
.9
.3
.7
.4
.4
.4
.8
.7
.5
.4
.4
.4
.3
. 1
.9
.8
.3
.8
.0
.8
. 1
.2
.0
.0
.2
.2
.4
NOXC
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
1 .
0.
0.
0.
0.
1 .
0.
0.
0.
0.
2.
0.
2.
1 .
1 .
3-
1 .
2.
2.
1 .
,87
,47
,87
,66
66
92
55
94
73
73
1 1
64
89
87
81
09
56
81
81
74
87
91
07
85
63
36
05
40
15
89
MPG
FUEL
ECON
8.6
7.3
10.0
7.9
8.2
13.4
12.4
14.8
12.9
13.2
17.7
17.4
20.5
17.5
18.2
17.4
16.7
19-3
17-0
17-5
17 .2
18.7
20.4
17.9
18.8
17.0
19.1
20.5
18.0
18.9
C-41
-------
APPENDIX C.CONT'D
LISTING'OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO. YR MAKE MODL C
338 75 PORS 91 1S 1
IHCs 50 PPM HEXA
ICOUCT] = 2.2 %
ICO[SPEC]= 2.0 %
INOX = 67 P
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANCE
340 75 TOYO CELI 1
ID
64
NE
CO
CO
PM
33
IHCs 190 PPM HEXANE
ICOUCT] = 0.3 %
CO
ICO[SPEC]= N/A %CO
INOX = 75 P
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANCE
341 75 TOYO CORO
IHCs 5 PPM HEXA
ICOUCT] 0.1 %
ICO[SPEC]= N/A %
INOX _: 51 p
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANCE
PM
97
NE
CO
CO
PM
TEST TYPE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
G
HC
4.
1 .
1 .
3.
2.
EFF
4.
1 .
1 .
2.
1 .
3.
1 .
2.
2.
2.
EFF
3.
1 .
1 .
2.
2.
4.
1 .
2.
3-
2.
EFF
3.
1 .
1 .
2.
1 .
44
80
90
07
37
39
17
19
71
84
20
91
28
53
28
43
83
66
60
12
91
52
30
14
43
68
09
68
33
78
RAMS
CO
54.
38.
31 .
46.
40.
52.
32.
29.
42.
36.
37.
24.
15.
30.
24.
47.
28.
21 .
37.
30.
52.
28.
29.
39.
33.
44.
24.
24.
34.
28.
PER MI
C02
5
5
7
2
0
6
7
9
2
0
9
6
3
9
8
6
8
3
8
6
8
0
4
9
5
6
6
2
2
6
420.
469.
385.
445.
436.
456.
526.
433.
492.
486.
395.
411 .
355.
403.
393-
403-
439.
377.
422.
415.
337.
380.
314.
359.
353-
349-
399.
319.
375-
367.
LE
NOXC
0
7
3
9
5
5
0
4
8
4
7
5
6
9
0
9
3
4
3
1
3
6
3
9
6
8
6
9
8
6
1
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
3
1
3
2
2
4
1
3
2
2
3
1
2
2
2
2
1
2
2
1
.64
.86
• 39
.23
.17
.63
.00
.46
.30
.25
.59
.53
.57
.51
.51
.10
.70
.96
.85
.81
.15
.31
.91
.19
.12
.77
- A
.28
i. |>
.44
.00
91
'
HPG
FUEL
ECOK
17.1
16.6
20.1
16.8
17.5
16.0
15.3
18.3
16.2
19-1
19-5
22.5
19-3
20.2
18.1
18.1
21.3
18.1
- A ft
18.9
20.'
nn 1
20.1
21.1
20.5
f. t I
21. '
6
?o'i
?H
A
21J
C-42
-------
ON
APPENDIX C ,CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
N0< YR MAKE MODL C
^42 75 VOLK SEDA
J
IHC= 180 PPM HEXA
ICO[ACT] - 2.2 %
ICO[SPEC]= 2.0 %
INOX - 80 P
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANCE
343 75 VOLK RABB
ID
97
NE
CO
CO
PM
90
IHC= 110 PPM HEXANE
TEST TYPE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
3
2
2
3
2
EF
2
2
2
2
2
12
2
2
r
HC
.40
.87
.86
. 12
.97
F
.88
.39
.18
.62
.43
.57
.55
.26
}RAMS PER MILE
CO C02
35
22
24
28
25
30
14
16
22
18
1 11
42
53
.3
. 1
.0
.4
.3
.5
.7
.0
.3
.3
.4
.3
.4
288
305
267
297
291
303
329
278
317
310
249
295
248
.2
.8
.7
.4
.8
.8
. 1
.3
.0
.0
.8
.7
.0
NOXC
2
1
2
2
1
2
1
2
1
1
0
0
1
.37
.71
.05
.03
.94
.33
.64
.16
.97
.92
.83
.68
.05
MPG
FUEL
ECON
25.0
25 .4
28.2
25.2
26.0
24.6
24.7
28.6
24.6
25.6
19.1
24.0
26.2
ICOtACT] = 2.5 *CO
ICO[SPEC]= 2:5 %
INOX = 42 P
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANCE
315 75 VOLV SEDA 1
T ti /i
IHC= 40 PPM HEXA
ICOtACT] = 1.-, %
INOXSPEC]: 1>1 %
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANCE
•»
CO
PM
21
NE
CO
CO
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP^
75 FTP
7
4
EF
13
3
3
8
5
3
1
2
2
2
EF
3
0
1
1
1
• 35
.53
F
.55
.09
.21
.10
.28
.60
.44
.32
.47
. 12
F
.51
.56
.75
.97
.49
75
59
114
57
64
84
70
92
55
72
73
67
90
38
65
63
56
.4
.5
.0
.3
.4
.5
.9
.5
.7
. 1
.3
.8
.4
.6
.5
.4
.6
273
273
237
273
226
256
253
393
432
356
413
403
486
521
433
504
490
.7
.2
.8
.2
.0
.2
.0
.5
.3
.7
.7
.7
.3
.6
.9
.7
.4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
.75
.81
.84
.58
.83
.70
.70
.53
.64
.27
.07
.00
.1 1
.59
.80
.84
.76
21 .4
23.3
19-3
23-8
26.3
21 .4
23-3
16.1
16.9
18.6
16.5
17.2
13-9
15.2
16.4
14.5
15.2
C-43
-------
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO. YR
511 75
IHC =
ICO[A
ICO[S
INOX
OTHER
AFTER
512 75
IHC =
MAKE MODL
FO
20
CT]
PEC
RD GRAN
CID
200
PPM HEXANE
= 0. 1
]= N/A
30
%CO
%CO
PPM
TESTS:
MAI
ME
30
ICOCACT]
ICOCS
INOX
OTHER
AFTER
513 75
IHC =
PEC
NTENANC
RC MONA
E
250
PPM HEXANE
- 0.0
]= N/A
- 151
*CO
*CO
PPM
TESTS:
MAI
NTENANC
OLDS OMEG
90
ICO[ACT]
ICOtSPEC
INOX
OTHER
AFTER
E
250
PPM HEXANE
0.0
]= N/A
= 156
*CO
*CO
PPM
TESTS:
MAI
NTENANC
E
TEST TYPE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MICE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
2
0
1
1
1
EF
2
0
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
EF
1
0
0
0
0
4
0
1
2
1
EF
2
1
1
2
1
G
HC
.78
.75
.45
.72
.36
F
.90
.79
.48
.80
.41
.87
.27
.93
.56
.57
F
.20
.20
.88
.68
.59
.62
.80
.60
.63
.80
F
.96
.30
.64
.09
.73
RAMS PER MILE
CO C02
33
22
33
27
27
37
32
32
34
33
44
4
34
23
20
52
5
27
27
21
79
10
32
43
30
85
17
47
49
39
.5
.4
.8
.7
.8
.4
.2
.4
.7
.3
.0
.4
.0
.4
.6
.6
.2
.2
.9
.0
.7
.0
.9
.4
.6
.3
.5
.8
.9
.7
527
574
491
552
542
497
510
454
504
492
595
601
559
598
588
668
657
597
662
643
495
539
467
518
511
499
468
449
483
470
.8
.8
.9
.3
.5
.5
.5
.9
.3
.7
.7
.4
.4
.7
.8
.9
.4
.2
.9
.4
.3
.8
.7
.5
.0
.7
.9
.6
.6
.0
F
NOXC E
1.05 1
0.76 1
1.11 1
0.90 1
0.92 1
0.92 1
0.48 1
0.73 1
0.69 1
0.64 1
1.73 1
1.78 1
1.57 1
1.76 1
1.71 1
1.53 1
1.42 1
1.39 1
1.47 1
1.43 1
1.71 i
t
2.45 1
1.94 1
2.10 1
2.16 1
„ 1
1.52
«r 1
1 .95
h O 1
1 .43 '
n ll 1
1 .74
.TO 1
1 .72
C-44
-------
APPENDIX C.CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE
DENVER
PROCEDURE
AND AFTER
RESULTS
MAINTENANCE
VEH
NO. YR MAKE MODL
51ll 75 PLYM GRNF
CID
400
IHC= 400 PPM HEXANE
ICOtACT] = 8.6
ICO[SPEC]= 0.3
INOX - 28
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANC
515 75 PONT VENT
*CO
*CO
PPM
E
250
IHC= 25 PPM HEXANE
ICOtACT] = 0.0
ICOtSPEC]= N/A
INOX = 83
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANC
516 75 BMW SEDA
*CO
%CO
PPM
E
121
IHC = o PPM HEXANE
ICOtACT] = o 1
ICO[SPEC]= 3.0
INOX - no
y o
°THER TESTS:
Af"TER MAINTENANC
ico
V v/ w
PPM
E
TEST TYPE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP^
75 FTP
(
HC
4 .92
4.29
3-45
4.59
4.19
EFF
3.99
0.37
1.15
2.10
1-33
4.39
0.29
0.91
2.25
1 .30
EFF
5.63
0.44
1 .05
2.92
1 .67
1 .98
0.34
0.97
1.12
0.85
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
3RAMS PER MILE
CO C02
131
131
1 10
131
125
1 1 1
26
56
67
52
1 12
4
24
56
32
149
1 1
37
77
46
26
1 1
9
18
14
.6
• 3
.6
.4
.7
.8
.2
.9
.2
.2
.3
.6
.6
.1
.2
.4
.0
.0
.3
.6
.8
.5
.3
.8
. 1
650
.0
650.7
571
650
628
706
775
642
742
725
443
462
430
453
449
475
540
488
509
512
474
528
418
502
487
.6
• 3
.9
.4
.4
.7
.4
.0
. 1
.4
.6
.2
.7
.5
.5
• 3
.4
.9
.9
.4
.9
.7
.5
i
NOXC
1
.42
0.91
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
3
2
2
2
0
1
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
.44
. 15
.16
.82
.64
.90
.73
.75
.78
.01
.45
.42
.60
.81
.20
.22
.01
.12
.08
.60
.94
.83
.79
MPG
FUEL
ECON
10.
10.
11 .
10.
10.
9-
10.
12.
10.
10.
14.
18.
18.
16.
17-
12.
15.
16.
13-
15.
17.
16.
20.
16.
17.
,2
,2
.7
2
6
9
9
1
4
9
0
9
8
2
6
2
9
1
9
0
0
2
3
6
3
C-45
-------
APPENDIX C.CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO. YR
517 75
IHC = 1
MAKE MODL
BMW 5301
340
ICO[ACT]
ICOtSPEC
INOX
OTHER
AFTER
518 75
IHC =
CID
182
PPM HEXANE
= 0.9
]= 3-0
3
JCO
$CO
PPM
TESTS:
MAI
SU
310
ICOtACT]
ICOtSPEC
INOX
OTHER
AFTER
519 75
IHC =
ICO[A
ICO[S
INOX
OTHER
AFTER
NTENANC
BA STAW
E
83
PPM HEXANE
= 1 .4
]= N/A
46
%CO
%CQ
PPM
TESTS:
MAI
ME
70
CT]
PEC
NTENANC
RB 450S
E
276
PPM HEXANE
= 1-3
]= 1.5
31
%CO
%co
PPM
TESTS:
MAI
NTENANC
E
TEST TYPE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
G
HC
2.14
0.44
1 .84
1 .26
1 .17
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
3.53
2.76
2.87
3.13
2.95
EFF
4.15
3.08
2.88
3-59
3.25
2.85
0.71
0.98
1 .73
1 .23
EFF
4 .50
0.84
1 .09
2.59
1 .66
RAMS PER MILE
CO C02
42
29
51
35
38
27
23
25
25
24
31
23
26
27
26
48
10
9
28
18
60
13
9
35
21
.9
.2
.8
.8
.2
.0
.5
.7
.2
.8
.8
.4
.6
.4
.0
.0
.7
.2
.6
.0
.6
. 1
.0
.8
.7
667
756
597
713
694
293
307
267
300
293
281
300
262
291
286
692
717
607
705
682
701
737
616
720
697
.2
.8
.3
.9
.8
.6
.5
.2
.9
.7
.7
.6
. 1
.6
.2
.3
.0
.7
.2
. 1
.8
.9
.4
.6
.3
NOXC
0.90
0.45
0.50
0.66
0.56
3.08
1.61
2.85
2.33
2.26
2.80
1.51
2.65
2.11
2.10
2.50
1.02
2.78
1.73
1.81
2.55
o
1 .08
2.90
__ n
1.78
4 flfl
1 . 00
MPG
FUEL
ECOll
12 0
L. , y
11.0
i i y
13.0
11.5
11.1
25.6
25.1
28.0
25-3
25-5
25.7
25-6
28.*
25-7
-t A
26.3
. . i
12.1
* li 1
11.2
11.7
. n ft
12.'
in 4
ID- J
11 7
i '•'
\\ 0
1 " '
12.11
C-46
-------
ON
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
MPG
VEH
N0. YR MAKE MODL CID
520 75 PORS 91
y *- •**
IHC= 30 PPM
ICOtACT] 0
ICO[SPEC]= 3
INOX
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENA
4 120
HEXANE
.7 %CO
0 2CO
79 PPM
NCE
521 75 SAAB 99LE 121
IHC=1600 PPM
ICOtACT] - 1
ICO[SPEC]= 1
INOX =
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENA
HEXANE
. 1 %CO
2 {CO
70 PPM
NCE
522 75 AMMO HORN 232
T 1 1 *+
IHC= 230 PPM
ICOtACT] = 2
ICO[SPEC]= 1
T H f\ u
INO Y
•* ** w A —
HEXANE
. 5 %CQ
• -S f* W \J
. 0 {CO
90 PPM
OTHER TESTS-
AF?ER MAINTENANCE
,
TEST TYPE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP^
75 FTP
HC
3.19
1 .99
1 .56
2.57
2.12
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
3.46
3.50
2.81
3.48
3-31
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
2.51
2.18
2.14
2.34
2.24
EFF
2.45
1 .96
2.02
2.20
2.08
RATIO r
CO
35
24
24
29
26
12
8
1 1
10
10
46
28
30
37
32
60
34
42
47
42
.7
.0
.7
.6
.6
.9
.7
.2
.7
.2
.5
.5
.7
. 1
.8
.4
.9
.6
. 1
.2
& n ri j. LI c
C02
376
420
330
399
387
362
359
309
361
346
416
386
371
400
388
454
427
402
440
426
.6
.9
. 1
.7
.0
.6
.6
.6
.0
.6
.5
.0
.5
.6
• 3
.9
.4
.5
.6
• 3
NOXC
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
3
2
2
3
3
3
3
3
2
2
1
2
2
.85
.06
.56
.44
.36
.87
.22
.38
.53
.67
.46
.52
.25
.49
.43
.10
.00
.96
.05
.01
r U&L
ECON
20
19
23
19
20
22
23
26
22
23
17.
20.
20.
19.
19.
15.
18.
18.
17.
17.
.0
. 1
.7
.5
.4
.5
. 1
.4
.8
.8
8
3
8
0
9
9
2
7
0
8
047
-------
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO. YR
523 75
IHC =
icou
MAKE MODL
AMMO HO
1 10 PPM
CT] = 3
ICO[SPEC]= 1
INOX
OTHER
AFTER
524 75
IHC =
- 1
TESTS:
MAINTENA
RN
CID
258
HEXANE
. 1
.0
31
NC
DODO MONA
300 PPM
ICO[ACT] 3
ICO[SPEC]= 0
INOX
OTHER
AFTER
525 75
IHC =
ICO[A
ICO[S
INOX
OTHER
AFTER
TESTS:
MAINTENA
MERC MA
25 PPM
CT] * 0
PEC]= N
_
TESTS:
MAINTENA
%CO
%CO
PPM
E
440
HEXANE
.4
• 3
30
NC
RQ
*CO
SCO
PPM
E
460
HEXANE
.4
/A
55
NC
JCO
*CO
PPM
E
TEST TYPE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
GRAMS PER MILE
HC CO C02
4.
2.
2.
3-
2.
EFF
5.
2.
2.
4.
3.
4.
2.
2.
3.
3.
EFF
2 .
0.
0.
1 .
0.
1 .
0.
1 .
1 .
1 .
EFF
2.
0.
1 .
1 .
1 .
47
56
53
48
95
62
66
38
08
19
64
87
27
72
07
23
19
74
17
76
70
94
29
30
19
67
77
36
68
32
138
47
65
90
70
170
63
65
1 14
86
81
59
42
69
59
53
5
20
28
19
37
26
18
31
26
20
16
1 1
18
15
.2
• 3
.2
.8
.9
.8
.5
.2
.8
.0
.2
.6
• 3
.9
.3
.0
.5
.7
.3
.4
.3
.3
.8
.6
.5
. 1
. 1
.4
.0
.7
483
518
472
501
498
477
494
470
486
484
665
649
615
657
643
756
821
710
790
777
832
878
747
856
833
834
879
741
857
832
.0
.0
. 1
.2
.3
.9
.3
.0
.4
.3
.2
.8
.7
.2
.7
.9
.0
.2
.3
.6
.7
.4
.8
.5
.4
.1
.3
.5
.7
.4
NOXC
1.49
2.09
2.12
1.80
1.98
1.13
1.68
2.01
1.11
1.65
2.9?
1.53
2.61
2.22
2.13
1.52
1.19
2.18
1.50
1.69
2.91
1.52
2.77
2.20
2.15
2.68
it f\
1 .19
f *\
2.62
_ f
2-06
ft C.
2.05
C-48
-------
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
ON
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST
INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE
DENVER
PROCEDURE
AND AFTER
RESULTS
MAINTENANCE
VEH
NO. YR MAKE MODL
534 75 AMMO GREM
IHC= 270 PPM HEX
ICOtACT] = 8.0
ICO[SPEC]= 1.0
INOX - 43
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANCE
535 76 AMMO HORN
CID
232
ANE
JCO
JCO
PPM
232
IHC= 140 PPM HEXANE
ICOtACT] = 2.7
ICO[SPEC]= 1.0
INOX = 38
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANCE
536 75 AMMO PACE
JCO
$CO
PPM
258
IHC = 180 PPM HEXANE
ICOtACT] = 6.4
ICO[SPEC]= 1 .0
INOX C n
o u
OTHER TESTS:
ApTER MAINTENANCE
$CO
%CQ
PPM
TEST TYPE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
r.
HC
5.
3.
3.
4.
3-
14
53
25
30
79
RAMS PER MILE
CO C02
75
64
43
69
61
.7
• 3
.9
.8
.1
315
319
299
317
313
.2
.7
.7
.5
.3
NOXC
1
1
.94
.74
2.23
1
1
.84
.91
MPG
FUEL
ECON
19.7
20.5
23.4
20. 1
21.1
EFF
6.
2.
3.
4.
3.
3.
1 .
2.
2.
2.
EFF
3.
1 .
2.
2.
2.
3-
2.
2.
2.
2.
EFF
2.
2.
2.
2.
2.
94
64
00
70
63
06
95
01
48
20
53
87
10
67
28
54
44
73
97
74
56
18
47
36
33
72
32
35
51
41
79
32
38
54
43
95
28
44
60
46
75
78
70
77
75
61
53
47
57
53
.0
.3
. 1
.3
.2
.0
.6
.9
.8
.9
.9
.3
• 3
.7
.6
.9
.1
.2
. 1
.5
.9
.5
.8
.5
.7
331
358
316
345
341
440
416
399
427
416
422
408
379
415
403
515
441
429
477
453
539
459
458
497
475
.1
.3
.8
.3
.4
.4
.4
.4
.9
.7
.0
.7
.7
.0
.5
.7
.9
.3
.2
.7
.2
.3
.3
.6
.5
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
2
2
1
2
1
2
1
1
.55
.27
.56
.41
.41
.22
.88
.81
.56
.72
. 14
.60
.63
.38
.51
.72
.43
.02
.05
.86
.42
.54
.15
.96
.89
19.0
21.3
23.3
20. 1
21 .2
15.5
18.7
19.0
17.0
18.0
15.2
19.3
19.5
17.1
18.3
13-7
15.5
16.2
14.6
15.3
13.8
16.1
16.4
14.9
15.6
C-49
-------
ON
APPENDIX C.CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO. YR MAKE MODL
538 75 AMMO HORN
CID
232
IHC= 30 PPM HEXANE
ICOCACT] 1.5
ICO[SPEC]= N/A
INOX = 42
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANC
540 75 AMMO PACE
%CQ
%CO
PPM
E
258
IHC= 140 PPM HEXANE
ICO[ACT] = 3.0
ICO[SPEC]= 1.0
INOX - 106
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANC
544 75 BUIC LESA
%CQ
%CO
PPM
E
350
IHC= 205 PPM HEXANE
ICOCACT] 5.4
ICO[SPEC]= N/A
INOX _ 24
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANC
%co
%co
PPM
E
TEST TYPE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
GRAMS PER MILE
HC CO C02
2 .
1 .
2.
2.
2.
EFF
2 .
1 .
2.
2.
1 .
2.
1 .
2.
2.
2.
EFF
9.
2.
2.
5.
4.
4.
2.
2.
3-
3.
EFF
1 .
0.
0.
1 .
0.
63
92
36
26
18
86
48
13
14
94
46
99
32
21
18
77
51
68
99
05
39
77
61
55
06
89
22
93
02
76
46
38
43
41
41
49
31
37
40
36
64
44
39
53
47
390
124
128
251
180
101
79
73
89
82
44
9
28
26
21
.0
.0
.0
.8
.0
.9
.2
.8
.2
.9
• 3
.2
.5
.8
.0
.0
.1
.3
.4
.0
. 1
.7
.0
.9
.3
.0
.5
.4
.0
.8
430
428
395
429
419
438
415
395
426
414
489
463
435
475
461
599
561
510
579
555
615
592
552
603
586
688
696
612
692
671
.5
.5
.2
.5
.8
.9
.2
.0
.6
.6
.6
.4
.7
.9
.2
.0
.6
.1
.5
.2
.8
.3
.8
.5
.4
.2
.2
.3
.4
.6
NOXC
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
3
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
1
.18
.72
•93
.91
.87
.75
.76
.69
.75
.71
.19
.17
.91
.66
.59
.15
.11
.05
.13
.10
.91
.91
.51
.39
.28
.75
f L
.66
.20
1 fl
. i °
— o
.03
HPG
FUEL
ECON
~17~i
18 0
• v . y
18.5
17.7
18.1
16.5
18.5
19.2
17.5
18.5
11.8
16.5
11.6
15.fi
16.1
7-1
11.6
12.3
8.5
A n h
10.'
11.3
< 1 1
12.2
tf> 1
13.1
.
-------
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER
DENVER
RESULTS
MAINTENANCE
VEH
NO. YR MAKE MODL
547 75 BUIC REGA
CID
350
IHC= 190 PPM HEXANE
ICOUCT] - 6.7
ICO[SPEC]= N/A
INOX = 37
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANC
549 75 BUIC LESA
%CQ
%CO
PPM
E
350
IHC= 140 PPM HEXANE
ICO[ACT] - 2.5
ICO[SPEC]= N/A
INOX = 29
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANC
550 75 BUIC LESA
%CO
%CO
PPM
E
350
IHC= 270 PPM HEXANE
ICO[ACT] =73
ICO[SpEC]= N/A
INOX = ^
OTHER TESTS-
ApTER MAINTENANC
%co
f> \S \J
PPM
E
TEST TYPE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP *
3
2
2
2
2
EF
2
0
1
1
1
3
1
1
2
1
EF
3
0
0
1
1
4
3
3
3
3
EF
3
2
2
2
2
r
HC
.48
.50
.58
.97
.72
F
.16
.42
.44
.25
.05
.17
.47
.78
.28
.91
F
.67
.24
.87
.88
.12
.36
.58
• 31
.95
.67
F
.97
.07
.04
.98
.45
3RAMS PER MILE
CO C02
100
65
80
81
76
51
13
36
32
27
87
46
50
65
55
86
10
38
47
34
127
120
98
123
115
102
48
62
74
63
.0
.0
.7
.7
.5
.8
.9
.0
.0
.7
.4
.0
.0
.8
.6
.9
.8
.4
.3
.0
.0
. 1
.9
.4
.7
.2
.3
.8
.1
.3
586
600
519
594
575
615
639
547
627
609
681
664
616
672
654
686
726
632
707
692
605
563
529
583
562
635
655
580
646
631
.8
-9
.2
. 1
.7
.4
.3
.2
.9
.3
.5
. 1
.5
.4
.7
.4
. 1
.6
. 1
.4
.2
.8
.2
.6
.9
.6
.8
.7
. 1
. 1
NOXC
2.28
1
1
1
1
2
0
1
1
1
3
0
2
2
1
1
0
1
1
0
2
0
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
.04
.46
.63
.41
.07
.81
.45
.42
.25
.32
.81
.55
.01
.80
.95
.49
.16
.19
.97
.01
.90
.47
.43
.28
.10
.18
.74
.62
.52
MPG
FUEL
ECON
1 1 .8
12.5
13.6
12. 1
12.6
12.6
13-4
14.6
13-0
13.5
10.7
12 .0
12.7
11.3
11 .9
10.6
1 1.9
12.8
11.3
11.8
10.8
11.6
12.8
1 1 .2
1 1.7
11 .0
12.0
12.9
11.5
12.0
C-51
-------
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO. YR MAKE MODL
551 75 BUIC LESA
CID
455
IHC= 200 PPM HEXANE
ICOUCT] = 3-8
ICO[SPEC]= N/A
INOX - 33
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANC
553 75 BUIC RIVI
%CQ
%CO
PPM
E
455
IHC= 195 PPM HEXANE
ICOUCT] = 6.9
ICO[SPEC]= N/A
INOX = 30
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANC
554 75 BUIC STAW
%co
%co
PPM
E
455
IHC= 220 PPM HEXANE
ICOUCT] = 6.8
ICO[SPEC]= N/A
INOX = 32
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANC
%co
%co
PPM
E
TEST TYPE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
GRAMS PER MILE
HC CO C02 NOXC
3.
3.
4.
3-
4.
EFF
3.
2.
0.
2.
2.
3.
3.
2.
3-
3-
EFF
2 .
1 .
2.
1 .
1 .
4.
4.
3-
4.
4.
EFF
9-
1 .
3.
5.
3-
92
70
69
81
01
44
51
57
96
17
37
81
93
60
48
12
20
01
64
61
26
34
88
30
20
02
84
85
28
87
73
85
64
79
77
67
50
56
58
55
87
122
75
105
102
38
27
40
33
33
110
1 11
97
1 1 1
107
139
50
118
92
87
.2
.2
.3
.4
.0
.1
.7
. 1
.5
.5
.0
.3
.9
.4
.4
.8
.9
.3
. 1
.5
.8
.9
. 1
.4
.6
.2
. 1
.9
.7
.2
650
597
567
622
600
687
693
597
690
666
724
665
644
693
672
746
727
656
736
711
673
665
605
669
650
746
755
674
751
731
.6
.6
.2
.9
.2
.5
.7
.8
.7
.2
.7
.5
.7
.9
.0
. 1
.2
. 1
.2
.7
.7
.6
.7
.5
.9
.9
.5
.4
.4
.6
2
0
1
1
1
2
0
1
1
1
2
0
1
1
1
2
0
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
2
0
1
1
1
.64
.8i|
.8H
.70
.^9
.12
.77
.27
.12
.18
.16
.61*
.36
.37
.15
.65
.62
.28
.59
.22
.52
.01
.67
.73
.50
.35
O rt
.89
f L
.50
r (\
.59
n *7
.37
HPG
FUEL
ECOK
in
11 Q
' ' 1
13-0
11.7
12.1
11.0
1U
12.?
11.2
11.7
10.2
10.2
11.5
10.2
10.5
10. y
11.5
12.2
11.2
nr
.5
10.3
_ , k
10.'
, , c
11.5
*
10.1
4 rt ft
10.'
8 9
P»7
10.2
I v *
9'-
/
C-52
-------
ON
APPENDIX C.CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
N0. YR MAKE MODL CID
559 75 CADI ELDO 500
IHC= 580 PPM HEXANE
ICOtACT] - 6.4 %CO
ICO[SPEC]= N/A %CO
INOX - 48 PPM
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANCE
560 75 CADI DEVI 500
IHC= 425 PPM HEXANE
ICOCACT] - 5.0 %CO
ICO[SPEC]= N/A $CO
INOX - 40 PPM
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANCE
565 75 CHEV VEGA 140
IHC = 980 PPM HEXANE
ICOtACT] = 10.0 56CO
ICO[SPEC]= N/A %CQ
INOX = 5 PPM
OTHER TESTS-
AFTER MAINTENANCE
•
TEST TYPE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
6
5
4
5
5
EF
3
1
3
2
2
5
4
3
4
4
HC
.26
.41
.37
.81
.30
F
.68
.07
.01
.32
.13
.02
.36
.61
.68
.29
3RAMS PER MILE
CO C02
168
149
134
158
149
94
21
104
56
59
106
87
68
96
86
.2
.3
.3
.4
. 1
.5
.5
.2
.4
. 1
.0
.9
.4
.6
.3
627
594
554
610
590
752
732
619
742
705
639
587
567
612
592
.8
. 1
.8
.2
.3
.7
.2
.2
.0
.6
. 1
.2
.3
.0
.5
NOXC
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
.19
.57
.35
.39
.43
.33
.84
.96
.60
.50
.54
.90
.77
.73
.79
MPG
FUEL
ECON
9
10
1 1
10
10
9
1 1
1 1
10
1 1
10
12
12
11
12
.7
.5
.4
. 1
.5
.7
.5
.2
.6
.0
.8
.0
.9
.4
.0
EFF
4
2
2
3
3
7
5
3
6
5
EF
6
2
1
4
3
.63
.69
.53
.62
.04
.71
.08
.89
.34
.30
F
.55
.66
.96
.52
.27
81
55
93
68
71
1 12
78
59
94
80
96
34
34
63
47
.7
.4
.3
.0
.2
. 1
.4
.6
.5
.2
. 1
.4
. 1
.9
.0
713
672
603
692
662
297
340
287
319
317
306
392
322
350.
355,
.4
.3
.4
.0
.0
.0
.8
.9
.8
.3
.0
.2
.2
.9
.4
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1 .
1 .
1 .
1 .
1 .
1 .
1 .
.69
.85
• 34
.77
.68
.14
.27
.70
.21
,36
00
15
20
08
13
10
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
17
18
22
18.
19.
18.
19-
23-
19.
20.
.4
.6
.7
.0
.3
.8
.5
.5
,2
3
6
5
2
1
2
C-53
-------
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO. YR MAKE MODL
567 75 CHEV VEGA
CID
140
IHC= 520 PPM HEXANE
ICOCACT] = 8.4
ICO[SPEC]= N/A
INOX = 27
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANC
568 75 CHEV VEGA
*co
%CO
PPM
E
140
IHC= 350 PPM HEXANE
ICOCACT] - 10.0
ICO[SPEC]= N/A
INOX = 8
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANC
569 75 CHEV VEGA
%CO
%CO
PPM
E
140
IHC= 345 PPM HEXANE
ICO[ACT] = 8.4
ICO[SPEC]= N/A
INOX = 15
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANC
%CO
%CO
PPM
E
TEST TYPE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
GRAMS PER MILE
HC CO C02 NOXC
3.
2.
1 .
2.
2.
EFF
2.
0.
0.
1 .
1 .
4.
1 .
1 .
2.
2.
EFF
2.
0.
0.
1 .
0.
3-
1 .
1 .
2.
1 .
EFF
2.
0.
0.
1 .
0.
84
01
88
88
35
61
62
98
58
13
09
94
40
97
23
32
48
84
36
96
25
32
44
24
75
62
27
76
40
89
80
54
43
67
56
60
22
26
40
31
124
55
39
88
65
61
16
18
37
26
80
44
35
61
49
67
14
20
39
26
.9
.5
.3
.2
.9
.0
.9
.7
.6
.6
.6
.3
.8
.5
.4
.3
.3
.5
.9
.2
.2
.6
.5
.6
.4
.6
. 1
.5
.7
.9
424
394
383
409
397
446
437
402
441
429
424
396
396
409
402
459
415
397
436
419
405
384
358
394
381
418
429
389
424
416
.8
.7
.5
. 1
.8
.5
.0
.4
.6
.5
.6
.3
.2
.9
. 1
.1
.6
.0
.4
.5
.5
.8
.7
.7
.9
.0
.6
.6
.0
.3
1
0
1
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
.60
• 57
•13
.06
• 93
.20
.53
• 91
.85
.7?
.11
.11
.68
.76
.63
.16
.10
.78
.76
.66
.61
.58
.88
.08
.88
.99
f i
.53
i-f t
.76
n C
.75
£. rt
.6V
HPG
FUEL
ECOI
15-?
» * I
18 ?
* V » £
19.1
16.9
11.9
16,2
18.?
19,8
17.*
18.*
1U
18.1
19-2
15.5
17-i
15.8
20.8
20.1
M-1
. i
19-'
15.»
- *
19-3
A < 1
21-'
. 0
l7-«
* rt \
19-'
,t i
ID'1
ioJ
17
?oJ
£W>'
18.1
1 J
19-2
i /
C-54
-------
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
HO. YR MAKE MODL
570 75 CHEV MONZ
CID
140
IHC= 300 PPM HEXANE
ICOUCT] = 6.5
ICO[SPEC]= N/A
INOX 25
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANC
571 75 CHEV VEGA
%CO
%CO
PPM
E
140
IHC= 840 PPM HEXANE
ICO[ACT] = 10.0
ICO[SPEC]= N/A
INOX = 13
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANC
580 75 CHEV NOVA
T Tl f\
%CQ
%CQ
PPM
E
350
JHC= 240 PPM HEXANE
ICO[ACT] = 5.9 %CQ
ICO[SPEC]= N/A
INOX
OTHER TESTS-
AFTER MAINTENANC
%CO
PPM
E
TEST TYPE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
3
2
1
3
2
EF
3
0
1
2
1
5
4
3
4
4
(
HC
.87
.29
.98
.05
• 53
F
.41
.89
.20
. 10
.49
.01
.01
.24
.49
.01
}RAMS PER MILE
CO C02
88
63
44
75
63
71
29
25
49
37
81
72
61
76
71
.6
.2
.5
.3
.3
.0
.6
.6
.4
. 1
.0
.7
.5
.7
.3
440,
380,
376,
408,
391 .
456.
429.
399.
442.
426.
314.
334.
282.
324.
316.
. 1
.2
.5
.9
.5
,8
0
5
3
7
8
1
5
9
1
;•
NOXC
1
0
1
1
1
1
0
1
0
0
1
0
1
1
1
.56
.88
• 32
.21
. 14
.28
.47
.25
.86
.85
.10
.90
. 12
.00
.00
MPG
FUEL
ECON
15.0
18.2
19.6
16.5
17.8
15.3
18.6
20.0
16.9
18.1
19.4
19.2
22.8
19.3
20. 1
EFF
7
4
3
6
5
5
3
3
4
3
EF
2
0
1
1
1
.75
.51
.91
.06
.01
.86
.61
• 31
.69
.99
F
.67
.50
.37
.54
.19
100
69
64
84
74
88
98
64
93
86
40
14
27
26
23
.7
.0
.9
.2
.4
.4
.2
.0
.5
.9
. 1
.8
.7
.9
.6
327.
355.
281 .
342.
329-
541.
488.
461 .
513.
492.
605.
607-
528.
606.
585.
7
8
1
3
6
8
4
8
9
1
2
4
8
4
5
1
0,
0,
1 .
0.
2.
0.
1 .
1 .
1 .
1 .
0.
1 .
0.
0.
.06
.94
.99
,00
.98
08
80
90
41
36
26
43
07
83
77
17.4
18.5
22.4
18.0
19-2
12.7
13-6
15.5
13-1
13-8
13- 1
14.0
15.4
13.6
14.2
C-55
-------
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO. YR MAKE MODL CID
581 7
IHC =
ICO[
ICO[
INOX
5 CHEV NOVA 350
240 PPM
ACT] =
SPEC] =
HEXANE
7 . 6 %CQ
N/A %CQ
55 PPM
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER
582 7
IHC =
ICO[
ICO[
INOX
MAINTENANCE
5 CHEV N
170 PPM
ACT] -
SPEC]=
r
OVA 350
HEXANE
2.9 JCO
N/A %CO
78 PPM
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER
MAINTENANCE
583 75 CHEV NOVA 350
IHC =
ICO[
ICO[
INOX
310 PPM
ACT] =
SPEC]=
-
HEXANE
3-8 %CO
N/A %CO
33 PPM
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER
MAINTENANCE
TEST TYPE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
GRAMS PER MILE
HC CO C02
4.
3-
2.
3.
3-
EFF
4.
1 .
2.
3.
2.
2.
2.
1 .
2.
2.
EFF
1 .
0.
1 .
1 .
1 .
5.
4.
4.
4.
4.
EFF
4.
3.
3-
3.
3.
27
41
69
82
39
72
90
49
25
64
37
26
97
31
20
91
49
26
17
00
23
45
15
82
53
17
25
35
69
47
96
125
79
111
106
78
54
49
65
57
54
47
52
50
50
50
17
38
33
30
1 12
88
97
99
95
82
47
65
64
59
.0
.2
.4
.2
.7
.0
.3
.6
.6
.9
.2
. 1
.5
.5
.1
.0
.7
.3
.2
.0
.2
.2
.5
.7
.7
.2
.8
.9
.3
.8
572
571
510
572
555
588
606
539
598
584
561
554
491
558
539
586
592
511
590
569
506
500
453
503
488
520
514
455
517
499
. 1
.9
.8
.0
.3
.5
.6
.8
.0
.7
.6
.7
.9
.0
.0
.8
.9
.2
.0
.3
.1
.5
.5
.2
.8
.7
.7
.9
.6
.9
NOXC
2.42
0.92
2.01
1.64
1-53
1.59
0.60
1.18
1.08
0.97
1.92
0.94
1.55
1.41
1.31
1.53
0.53
1.15
1.01
0.90
1.54
0.88
1.25
1.20
1.12
1 .46
0.75
A ^
1 J3
f\ f\
1 .09
1.00
HPG
FUEL
SCQH
12.]
11.*
13-8
11.7
12.1
12.2
12.?
14.2
12.5
13.0
13,6
14.0
15.3
13.8
14.2
13.2
14.3
t ** *?
13-1
t it 1
14.3
12.?
i 1 (t
13. 6
. ii i
14. 5
13-'
i *\ L
13.°
b
f 3 *
15-6
14.1
1 n '
14-1
056
-------
ON
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
KO. YR MAKE MODL CID
<588 75 CHEV MONT 350
J ^
IHC= 80 PPM HEXANE
ICOUCT] = 1 .4 SCO
ICO[SPEC]= N/A %CO
INOX = 48 PPM
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANCE
589 75 CHEV MALI 350
IHC= 180 PPM HEXANE
ICOUCT] = 8.7 %CQ
ICO[SPEC]= N/A *CO
INOX 10 PPM
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANCE
591 75 CHEV MONT 350
IHC= 500 PPM HEXANE
ICOUCT] . 9.8 jco
ICO[SPEC]= N/A *co
AnuA = 25 PPM
OTHER TESTS-
AFTER MAINTENANCE
«
TEST TYPE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP,
75 FTP
2
2
1
2
2
EF
2
1
1
2
1
4
5
3
4
4
EF
4
2
2
3
2
6
5
5
5
5
EF
5
3
3
3
3
r
HC
.91
.91
.94
.91
.65
F
.26
.76
.26
.00
.73
.54
.31
.27
• 94
.60
F
.13
.47
• 33
.26
.77
.23
.69
.06
.94
.63
F
.05
.00
.02
.98
.43
3RAMS PER MILE
CO C02
76
85
51
81
74
52
45
30
48
42
120
159
97
141
134
115
82
83
98
89
183
169
152
175
167
171
91
129
129
118
.7
.4
.2
.3
-3
.7
.0
.8
.7
.7
.9
.9
• 3
.2
.8
.3
• 3
.8
. 1
.5
.0
.0
.4
.7
.3
. 1
. 1
.8
.4
.1
573
536
518
554
539
559
543
509
551
537
532
454
459
491
472
570
563
517
566
552
476
450
425
462
449
583
613
511
599
579
.5
.9
.9
.4
.5
.9
.0
.9
.1
.4
.0
.6
.9
.7
.0
. 1
.4
.2
.6
.2
.7
.2
.6
.9
.0
.5
.6
.4
.2
.5
i
NOXC
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
1
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.90
.04
.73
.45
.40
.55
.67
.13
.09
.98
.51
.52
.02
.99
.86
.18
.52
.78
.83
.72
.84
.45
.69
.64
.59
.83
.68
.58
.75
.68
MPG
FUEL
ECON
12,
13.
14.
12,
13.
13.
14.
15.
14.
14.
12.
12.
14.
12.
12.
1 1 .
12.
13.
12.
12.
11.
12.
13.
11 .
12.
10.
1 1 .
12.
10.
1 1 .
.6
,0
.7
.8
4
7
3
8
0
5
1
3
2
2
7
6
7
5
1
7
3
1
0
7
2
2
6
2
9
4
C-57
-------
APPENDIX C.CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO. YR MAKE MODL
592 75 CHEV MONT
CID
350
IHC= 340 PPM HEXANE
ICOCACT] 5.7
ICO[SPEC]= N/A
INOX = 27
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANC
593 75 CHEV MALI
56CO
$CO
PPM
E
350
IHC= 470 PPM HEXANE
ICO[ACT] = 9.4
ICO[SPEC]= N/A
INOX - 26
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANC
594 75 CHEV MONT
*CO
*CO
PPM
E
350
IHC= 230 PPM HEXANE
ICOCACT] = 5.2
ICOCSPEC]= N/A
INOX = Ho
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANC
*CO
%CO
PPM
E
TEST TYPE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
GRAMS PER MI
HC CO C02
4.
3-
3.
3.
3-
EFF
2.
0.
0.
1 .
0.
4.
3.
2.
3.
3.
EFF
2 .
0.
0.
1 .
1 .
4.
3.
2.
3.
3-
EFF
2.
0.
0.
1 .
1 .
44
13
02
76
37
28
18
96
18
82
01
42
62
70
32
22
85
98
51
17
47
00
49
70
16
16
71
94
40
07
116
98
75
106
95
81
9
37
44
32
96
93
73
94
88
55
21
34
38
32
91
1 12
66
102
95
67
43
48
55
50
.2
.2
.8
.8
.8
.9
.7
.8
.3
.2
.4
.1
.7
.7
.5
.8
.9
.0
. 1
.2
.0
.6
.5
.3
.6
.6
.9
.8
.2
.1
524.
492.
470.
508.
493-
611.
654.
550.
633-
617.
542.
501 .
488.
521.
506.
599.
603-
550.
601 .
588.
536.
490.
465.
512.
493-
586.
616.
537-
601 .
588.
LE
NOXC
9
7
1
1
2
9
1
5
9
1
9
0
9
0
3
0
1
9
1
0
6
6
2
6
1
0
4
1
8
5
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
•53
.62
.27
.06
.99
.99
.56
.86
.76
.73
.69
.79
.3*
.22
.13
.31
.68
.23
.00
.97
.53
.16
.12
.97
.86
.95
-0
.28
e. i
.6J
.60
54
1
HPG
FUEL
ECOS
12,]
' J
'3.5
11.8
12. f
13.6
1U
13.2
R5
12.6
13.2
12.6
13-5
H.5
13.0
13-5
12.8
13.?
lU
13.3
, i o
13-8
12.8
. * t
13-'
15^
. . ft
13.0
«5 I,
13-"
i? ?
it-1
12.5
1 fr
lU
1
12.8
1 1
If-2
C-58
-------
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
ON
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
N0. YR MAKE MODL
cos 75 CHEV MALI
J y •*
CID
350
IHC= 130 PPM HEXANE
ICOtACT] - 1.3
ICO[SPEC]= N/A
INOX - 42
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANC
596 75 CHEV STAW
%CO
%CO
PPM
E
350
IHC= 190 PPM HEXANE
ICOtACT] - 5.3
ICO[[PEC]= N/A
INOX . 24
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANC
598 75 CHEV NOVA
*CO
%CO
PPM
E
350
IHC= 370 PPM HEXANE
ICOtACT] =54
lCO[SpEC]= N/A
1 NoY _
•«• *1 U A — O Q
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANC
%co
r* w \J
*CO
PPM
E
TEST TYPE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP^
t
HC
3.
2.
2.
2.
2.
45
57
1 1
99
62
3RAMS PER MILE
CO C02
76
55
50
65
58
.6
.4
.2
.6
.3
593
581
529
586
569
. 1
.0
.9
.8
.6
i
NOXC
2.01
1
1
1
1
. 10
.66
.54
.44
MPG
FUEL
ECON
12.3
13-1
14.4
12.7
13.3
EFF
2 .
0.
1 .
1 .
1 .
5.
3.
2.
4.
3.
EFF
3.
1 .
1 .
2.
1 .
5.
4.
3.
4.
4.
EFF
3.
1 .
2.
2.
2.
71
47
26
54
15
62
55
37
54
65
26
09
13
13
55
27
55
97
89
54
29
74
36
48
23
71
17
43
43
35
139
101
73
119
101
103
28
43
64
47
1 19
128
104
124
120
82
54
74
67
65
.6
.5
.3
.4
.6
.9
.6
.8
.9
.9
. 1
.2
. 1
.0
.7
.6
.2
.8
. 1
.0
.2
.3
. 1
.6
.4
582
614
530
599
585
615
582
554
598
581
645
664
597
655
642
484
447
431
464
450
528
531
461
530
512
.7
.9
. 1
.5
.2
.4
.6
.0
.3
.5
.7
• 3
.6
.4
.3
. 1
.0
.5
.8
.4
.7
.7
.6
• 3
.0
1
0
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
.42
.80
.18
.10
.03
.93
.95
.42
.42
.28
.27
.21
.69
.71
.56
.97
.71
.46
• 31
.18
.43
.54
.94
.97
.83
12.6
13-8
14.7
13-2
13-8
10.4
1 1.8
13-1
11.1
1 1.8
10.9
12.5
13-3
11.6
12.3
12.9
13-4
14.6
13-1
13-6
13.3
14.3
15-2
13.8
14.3
C-59
-------
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO. YR MAKE MODL
599 75 CHEV MONT
CID
350
IHC= 300 PPM HEXANE
ICOCACT] = 3.3
ICO[SPEC]= N/A
INOX - 35
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANC
600 75 CHEV MALI
*CO
*CO
PPM
E
350
IHCs 680 PPM HEXANE
ICOUCT] * 8.0
ICO[SPEC]= N/A
INOX - 10
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANC
608 75 CHEV CAPR
%CO
%CO
PPM
E
454
IHC= 410 PPM HEXANE
ICOUCT] = 0.1
ICO[SPEC]= N/A
INOX = 36
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANC
*CO
*CO
PPM
E
TEST TYPE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
GRAMS PER MILE
HC CO C02 NOXC
2 .
2.
1 .
2.
2.
EFF
2.
1 .
1 .
2.
1 .
4.
5.
4.
5.
4.
EFF
3-
1 .
2.
2.
2.
32.
12.
21 .
22.
19-
43
47
78
45
27
54
65
23
08
72
94
12
33
04
87
26
86
17
53
23
49
59
28
1 1
06
EFF
3-
0.
1 .
1 .
1 .
19
63
45
85
38
56
77
38
67
62
56
45
31
50
43
98
130
76
115
109
69
38
46
53
47
101
10
59
53
42
52
0
33
25
20
. 1
.9
.2
.5
.6
. 1
.7
.2
.7
.9
.5
.3
.8
. 1
.2
.7
.7
. 1
.6
. 1
.6
.2
.6
.9
.5
.9
.5
.5
.6
.3
546
480
491
511
496
578
544
525
560
546
495
446
429
469
451
565
565
496
565
546
829
905
774
869
854
851
883
762
868
844
.2
.3
.0
.8
.8
.3
.0
.5
.4
.0
.5
.3
.6
.9
.9
.2
.4
.8
.3
.6
.8
.9
.2
.5
.3
.6
.8
.3
.4
.0
3
1
3
2
2
1
0
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
1
3
2
3
2
2
2
1
2
2
2
.17
.80
.51
.60
.61
.70
.78
.57
.22
.18
.89
.67
.71
.26
.21
.67
.82
.12
.22
.16
.11
.35
.00
.87
.75
/* f
.86
_ f
.50
34
>
4 ft
. 1o
A 9
.03
HPO
FUEL
BCOH
13 8
J ' V
11 5
* ' J
15.5
11.2
11.?
13-2
11.3
15.3
13.?
11.3
13-3
13-3
15.?
13-3
13-5
13-0
11.0
15-*
13.5
.1, t
11.1
8.1
ft 1
9.2
n C
9.7
811
.?
A I)
9.u
o 1
7"'
10. 0
| V ' *
10.8
1 *
9-f
10.'
1 v
C-60
-------
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
N0. YR MAKE MODL C
ID
609 75 CHRY CORD 360
IHC= 80 PPM HEXA
ICOtACT] = 1.6*
ICOtSPEC]= 0.3 %
INOX = 38 P
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANCE
NE
CO
CO
PM
610 75 CHRY CORD 360
IHC= 340 PPM HEXA
ICOtACT] - 8.0 %
ICOtSPEC]= 0.3 %
INOX _, 55 p
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANCE
611 75 CHRY NEWP 4
IHC = U20 PPM HEXA
ICOtACT] = 10.0 %
ICO[SPEC]= o.3 %
!NOX = 14 p
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANCE
NE
CO
CO
PM
00
NE
CO
\s \j
PM
TEST TYPE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP'
i
HC
3.
2.
2.
2.
2.
05
08
42
54
37
3RAMS PER MILE
CO C02
88
63
77
75
72
.4
.5
.2
.4
.4
592.
572.
499-
582.
556.
,4
4
5
0
7
NOXC
1
0
1
1
1
.40
.73
.61
.05
. 1 1
MPG
FUEL
ECON
12.0
13.1
14. 1
12.5
13.1
EFF
2.
0.
1 .
1 .
1 .
5.
1 .
2.
3.
2.
EFF
3.
1 .
1 .
2.
1 .
9.
10.
7.
10.
9.
EFF
3.
1 .
2.
2 .
2.
00
76
92
35
33
29
92
83
53
86
24
17
78
16
76
05
92
89
03
71
69
31
07
45
01
66
30
74
47
49
80
51
70
65
62
72
29
5
49
31
153
185
129
169
163
102
40
66
70
60
.0
.7
.4
.6
.9
.2
.8
.5
.4
.8
.5
.0
.7
.8
.6
.4
.0
.9
.9
.4
.5
.2
.5
.0
.2
625.
667.
549.
647.
626.
590.
596.
525-
593-
576.
618.
659.
566.
639-
625.
589.
534.
508.
560.
538.
703-
751 .
622.
728.
706.
1
9
1
4
7
6
8
8
8
2
5
1
8
7
6
0
1
7
4
5
2
2
7
2
2
0
0
1
0
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
.92
.47
.13
.69
.74
.76
.29
• 71
.52
.50
.66
.19
.70
.41
.43
.70
.90
.54
.28
.24
.32
.07
.36
.19
.20
12. 1
12.4
13-2
12.2
12.5
12.1
13.0
13.7
12.5
13.0
1 1 .9
12.5
15.3
12.2
13-0
10.3
10.3
12 .0
10.3
10.7
10. 1
10.8
12. 1
10.5
11.0
C-61
-------
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO. YR MAKE MODL
613 75 CHRY NEWP
IHC= 370 PPM
ICOUCT] = 6
ICO[SPEC]= 0
INOX
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENA
CID
400
HEXANE
.8
.3
34
NCE
615 75 CHRY NEWY
IHC= 200 PPM
ICO[ACT] - 5
ICO[SPEC]= 0
INOX
OTHER TESTS:
/SCO
%co
PPM
440
HEXANE
.6
.3
42
%CO
%CO
PPM
AFTER MAINTENANCE
616 75 DODG DART
IHC= 220 PPM
ICOUCT] 5
ICO[SPEC]= 0
INOX
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENA
HEX
-3
.3
59
NCE
225
ANE
%co
%co
PPM
TEST TYPE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
GRAMS PER MILE
HC CO C02
4.
4.
4.
4.
4.
EFF
4.
1 .
2.
3-
2.
5.
3.
3-
4.
3-
EFF
3-
0.
0.
1 .
1 .
3-
2.
2.
3.
2.
EFF
3-
2.
2.
2.
2.
61
52
53
56
54
85
41
89
05
52
07
40
02
20
64
18
26
96
66
06
88
45
54
13
77
66
23
40
91
57
1 15
123
122
119
121
141
45
104
91
81
107
98
74
102
93
85
13
37
47
34
66
54
50
60
55
74
52
50
62
56
.7
.6
.0
.8
.5
.5
.6
.6
.5
.'4
.4
.2
.4
.6
.6
.3
. 1
.7
.7
.7
.7
. 1
.3
.1
.7
. 1
.2
.6
.7
.3
697
629
579
661
629
730
758
654
744
724
698
686
655
692
680
789
863
773
827
823
442
406
388
423
408
452
442
402
447
433
.6
.1
.6
.9
.7
.0
• 7
.7
.9
•1
.6
.0
.8
.0
.4
.2
.1
.2
.7
.3
.4
.4
.5
.6
.9
.6
.2
.7
.2
.6
NOXC
1.77
1.20
1.68
1 .47
1.45
1.31
0.73
1.39
1.02
1.03
2.17
1.29
2.36
1.85
1.82
1.19
0.70
1.27
0.91
0.96
3-29
2.13
3.00
2.69
2.61
2.37
. ft "5
1 .73
« f
2.15
_ i*
2.01
. no
1 .9°
HPG
FUEL
ECOH
9 9
' ' I*
10. i
11.3
•i
10.3
lO.i
9,2
10.6
10.!
9.9
10.3
10.0
10. i
11.3
10.2
10. i
9-5
10.0
10.6
A 0
9.8
10.1
15-9
<0 7
18, 1
f 0
16.0
4 n ft
I?."
.
16.?
I v * '
18.1
I v *
16J
C-62
-------
APPENDIX C.CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
HO. YR MAKE MODL C
618 75 DODG DART 3
IHC= 200 PPM HEXA
ICOUCT] = 6.0 %
ICO[SPEC]= 0.3 %
INOX = 10 P
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANCE
620 75 DODG CHAR 3
ID
18
NE
CO
CO
PM
18
IHC= 300 PPM HEXANE
ICOCACT] = 6.9 %
ICO[SPEC]= 0.3 %
INOX = 48 P
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANCE
CO
CO
PM
621 75 DODG CHAR 360
IHC= 200 PPM HEXA
ICOCACT] = 5.0 %
ICO[SPEC]= 0.3 %
INOX = 48 p
OTHER TESTS:
ApTER MAINTENANCE
NE
CO
CO
PM
TEST TYPE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
n
HC
4.
2.
2.
3.
2.
EFF
3.
0.
0.
1 .
0.
3-
2.
1 .
2.
2.
EFF
2.
0.
0.
1 .
1 .
3.
2.
2.
2.
2.
EFF
3.
1 .
1 .
2.
1 .
60
66
35
59
97
02
19
88
55
96
23
70
92
95
60
19
73
94
43
09
06
54
42
79
62
1 1
15
77
09
72
RAMS PER MILE
CO C02
86
75
40
80
68
56
8
13
31
19
49
71
31
61
56
37
24
14
30
24
75
78
75
77
77
67
33
60
49
47
.0
.4
.7
.5
. 1
.5
. 1
.4
.3
.5
.8
.6
.7
.2
.2
.5
.3
.5
.6
.3
. 1
.8
.5
.0
. 1
.6
.4
.4
.8
.8
525
542
493
534
525
576
636
550
607
600
536
504
489
519
506
605
618
549
612
596
525
538
461
532
515
556
634
508
597
584
.8
.6
.5
.6
.8
.9
.3
. 1
.9
.6
.5
.0
. 1
.5
.6
.9
.3
.4
.3
.9
.7
.9
.8
.6
.2
.0
.6
.8
.0
. 1
NOXC
1
0
1
1
1
1
0
0
1
0
3
1
4
2
2
1
0
1
0
1
2
1
2
1
1
1
0
1
0
0
.62
.65
.39
. 1 1
.05
.38
.66
.87
.00
.86
.23
.34
.55
.24
.60
.33
.66
.59
.98
.05
.34
.04
.16
.66
.61
.19
.31
.00
.73
.68
MPG
FUEL
ECON
13.1
13-3
15.7
13.2
13.8
13.1
13.7
15.5
13.4
14.0
14.2
14.2
16.3
14.2
14.7
13.2
13-5
15.4
13.3
13-9
13.6
13-2
15.1
13-4
13-8
13-2
12.8
14.6
13.0
13-4
C-63
-------
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE
DENVER
PROCEDURE
AND AFTER
RESULTS
MAINTENANCE
VEH
NO. YR MAKE MODL CID
622 75 DODG CHAR 400
IHC= 210 PPM
ICOUCT] - 1
ICO[SPEC]= 0
INOX
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENA
HEXANE
.6 $CO
.3 *CO
38 PPM
NCE
623 75 DODG MONA 400
IHC=1300 PPM
ICOUCT] = 10
ICO[SPEC]= 0
INOX =
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENA
624 75 FORD PI
IHC= 40 PPM
ICOUCT] = 0
HEXANE
.0 %CO
.3 *CO
14 PPM
NCE
NT 140
HEXANE
.4 *CO
ICO[SPEC]= N/A %CO
INOX =
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENA
42 PPM
NCE
TEST TYPE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
GRAMS PER MI
HC CO C02
6.
2.
2.
4.
3.
EFF
5.
0.
2.
2.
2.
7.
6.
5.
6.
6.
EFF
4.
1 .
3.
3.
2.
2.
1 .
1 .
2.
1 .
EFF
3.
1 .
1 .
2.
1 .
21
80
81
43
50
22
81
18
92
09
43
29
47
83
30
58
85
62
16
89
77
47
93
09
86
38
20
76
24
80
99
66
50
82
69
97
30
49
62
49
152
172
126
163
156
1 12
63
87
87
80
44
28
27
36
31
47
29
28
38
32
.0
.9
.3
.2
.0
.5
• 3
.9
.5
.5
.8
.7
.6
. 1
.0
.7
.6
• 3
. 1
.2
.8
.6
.3
.4
.6
.2
.6
.2
.0
.8
608.
607.
559.
608.
594.
695.
758.
633-
728.
711.
623.
591 -
527.
607.
580.
659.
681 .
574.
6.71 .
648.
389.
401 .
354.
395-
386.
407.
433-
367-
421 .
410.
LE
NOXC
9
3
9
1
7
5
2
2
2
2
8
6
1
0
6
4
8
9
1
0
1
3
6
5
0
5
9
9
3
4
1
0
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
2
1
2
1
1
1
0
1
1
1
.62
.75
.19
.17
• 13
.03
• 39
.71
.70
.61
.26
.73
.12
.98
.95
.18
.61
.12
.88
.87
.26
.18
.28
.70
.70
.7^
flA
. 00
f A
.69
_ t\
.29
•
HPG
FOEL
ECOl
11 \
1 . j
12.3
13.?
11,8
12.*
10,3
11,11
12.*
10. 6
51.2
10.0
10.1
11.5
10.0
10,5
10. ^
11.3
12,3
10. f
. ft
11.3
19-0
* ft 1
19-1
22,0
19-3
AA 1
20.1
8 0
iB.'j
21.2
£ ! '
19.0
C-64
-------
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
H0. YR MAKE MODL CID
649 75 FORD GRAN 302
IHC= 275 PPM HEXANE
ICOtACT] = 4.8 %CO
ICO[SPEC]= N/A *CO
INOX = 48 PPM
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANCE
653 75 FORD STAW 351
IHC= 60 PPM HEXANE
ICOtACT] 1 .8 %CO
ICO[SPEC]= N/A %CO
INOX - 40 PPM
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANCE
654 75 FORD ELIT 400
lHCr1i50 PPM HEXANE
ICOtACT] . 0.1 *CO
!COtSPEC]= N/A %CO
INOX = 101 PPM
°THER TESTS-
AFTER MAINTENANCE
TEST TYPE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 F TP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP^
(
HC
1 1 .
4.
3-
7-
5.
EFF
5.
3.
3.
4.
3.
3-
1 .
1 .
2.
1 .
EFF
2.
1 .
1 .
2.
1 .
2.
3.
2.
2.
2.
EFF
1 .
0.
0.
1 .
0.
60
16
88
72
62
07
18
89
08
76
52
62
36
53
94
99
21
24
06
58
88
06
51
97
87
58
66
86
10
90
JRAMS PER MILE
CO C02
250
1 10
94
177
135
145
85
1 13
114
105
73
51
42
62
53
62
30
34
45
38
16
8
11
12
10
30
14
22
22
19
.2
.9
.8
.6
.2
.6
.7
. 1
.4
.5
.3
.7
.7
.0
.7
.4
.7
.5
.9
.2
.3
.7
.2
.3
.9
.7
.3
.6
.2
.9
460
522
466
492
494
561
601
512
582
568
665
646
599
655
637
728
741
661
735
716
685
624
580
653
625
784
830
700
808
•785
.8
.4
.5
.9
.5
.9
• 3
.4
.4
.9
.5
.9
.3
.8
.8
.4
• 3
.6
. 1
.9
.0
.9
.7
.6
.2
.0
.5
.5
.3
.5
\
NOXC
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
3.
1 .
3.
2.
2.
2.
1 .
1 .
1 .
1 .
3-
1 .
2.
2.
2.
2.
1 .
1 .
1 .
1 .
30
43
53
37
43
68
31
48
49
43
61
62
86
57
64
72
03
98
84
64
70
67
72
64
38
16
51
80
82
72
MPG
FUEL
ECON
10.
12.
14.
1 1 .
12.
1 1 .
11 .
12.
1 1 .
1 1 .
1 1 .
12.
13-
1 1 .
12.
10.
11 .
12.
10.
11 .
12.
13-
14.
13-
13-
10.
10.
12.
10.
10.
0
5
1
1
2
0
9
6
5
9
2
1
2
7
2
6
2
3
9
3
3
7
6
0
6
6
4
0
5
8
C-65
-------
APPENDIX C.CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO. Y
R MAKE MODL
655 75 FORD LTD
IHC =
ICO[
ICO[
INOX
CID
460
40 PPM HEXANE
ACT] - 1.9
SPEC]= N/A
33
%CO
%CO
PPM
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER
MAINTENANC
656 75 FORD GRAN
IHC =
ICO[
ICO[
INOX
OTHE
AFTER
664 7
IHC =
ICO[
ICO[
INOX
OTHE
AFTER
E
351
85 PPM HEXANE
ACT] - 4.4
SPEC]= N/A
29
R TESTS:
MAINTENANC
5 FORD THND
*CO
$CO
PPM
E
460
220 PPM HEXANE
ACT] = 9.5
SPEC]= N/A
44
R TESTS:
MAINTENANC
%CQ
%CO
PPM
E
TEST TYPE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
GRAMS
HC CO
4.
0.
1 .
2.
1 .
EFF
3.
0.
1 .
2.
1 .
6.
3.
3.
5.
4.
EFF
4.
2.
2.
3-
2.
4.
3.
3-
4.
3.
EFF
1 .
0.
1 .
1 .
1 .
53
93
07
66
71
59
88
51
17
61
75
46
88
03
25
95
44
32
64
93
42
65
1 1
02
66
61
85
01
21
05
44.
41.
25.
42.
37.
30.
23.
15.
26.
22.
109.
117.
69.
113.
102.
43-
20.
17.
31.
24.
147.
152.
104.
150.
138.
49.
41 .
25.
45.
38.
PER MILE
C02 NOXC
1
8
7
9
9
1
7
6
7
8
4
2
8
5
7
6
2
9
4
4
5
4
6
1
4
1
7
5
2
8
768
851
759
81 1
809
785
834
763
81 1
804
587
576
549
581
571
669
677
608
673
656
675
709
638
693
683
858
907
799
883
867
.0
.2
.2
.3
.0
.8
.2
.2
. 1
.9
.2
.4
.7
.6
.3
.8
.0
.5
.6
.8
.3
.6
.7
.2
.2
.4
.0
.1
.7
.6
4.24
1.51
2.09
2.82
2.23
4.99
1.89
2.26
3-37
2.63
3-76
1.27
3.20
2.46
2.31
2.97
1.62
2.71
2.27
2.20
2.17
0.82
1.80
1.47
1.37
_ A
2.38
A 4
1.01
_ AT
2 .07
f n
1 .67
. c a
1 .5°
HPS
FOEL
ECOJ
10 I
1 u * "
M
11.1
10.0
10.2
10,5
10.2
11.2
10.3
10.5
ll.i
11.5
0.2
1U
11.9
ll.i
12.-
13.«
12.1
.A i.
12.6
9.f
93
•l
j rt A
10. f
9'i
•"
A 1
9-'
q >
7'
J.I
10.5
M
/
9.5
C-66
-------
APPENDIX C.CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
H0> YR MAKE MODL CID
665 76 LINC CONT 460
IHC= 40 PPM HEXANE
ICOUCT] - 0.0 %CQ
ICO[SPEC]= N/A %CO
INOX 43 PPM
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANCE
667 75 MERC MONA 200
IHC= 35 PPM HEXANE
ICOUCT] = 0.3 %CO
ICO[SPEC]= N/A %CO
INOX = 28 PPM
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANCE
6?2 75 MERC MONO 351
IHC= UO PPM HEXANE
ICOUCT] = 2.5 *CO
ICO[SPEC]= N/A %CO
• » A ~ O rt ^ T^ kf
£0 PPM
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANCE
TEST TYPE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP^
r.
HC
3-
1 .
1 .
2.
1 .
76
31
17
48
78
(RAMS PER MILE
CO C02
30.
49.
7.
40.
33.
6
0
0
2
7
779
727
706
752
732
.4
.4
.0
• 3
• 3
N
0
0
1
0
0
oxc
.91
.84
.34
.87
.99
MPG
FUEL
ECON
10
1 1
12
10
1 1
.6
.0
• 3
.8
.2
EFF
2.
0.
0.
1 .
0.
5.
1 .
3-
3.
2.
EFF
6.
1 .
2.
3-
2.
3-
1 .
1 .
2.
2.
EFF
3-
1 .
2.
2.
1 .
55
39
67
43
91
39
37
00
30
64
1 1
20
97
55
69
54
79
92
62
18
47
25
00
31
91
24.
3.
6.
13.
8.
23.
20.
15.
22.
19.
24.
20.
18.
22.
20.
61 .
51 .
49.
56.
52.
64.
20.
38.
41 .
34.
3
3
0
4
4
4
6
0
0
7
4
0
5
1
5
6
0
0
1
6
2
3
4
3
3
910
905
851
907
891
480
482
421
481
465
456
471
415
464
453
692
687
604
690
665
714
729
.0
. 1
.9
.4
.6
.7
.0
.0
.4
. 1
.4
.5
.4
.2
. 1
.7
.6
.3
.0
.9
.5
.5
630.4
722
.3
699.4
1
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0,
0,
0.
0.
1 .
0.
1 .
1 .
1 .
1 .
1 .
1 .
1 .
1 .
-38
.43
.84
.41
.53
.79
.44
.61
.61
.56
.76
.44
.64
.59
,56
,85
89
59
35
28
78
18
77
47
47
9
9
10
9
9
16
17
19
16
17
17
17,
19.
17.
18.
1 1 .
1 1.
12.
1 1 .
1 1 .
10.
1 1 .
12.
1 1 .
11 .
.3
.7
.3
.5
.8
.6
. 1
.5
.9
.6
.3
.5
.6
.4
0
1
5
9
3
7
7
6
7
2
7
C-67
-------
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO. YR MAKE MODL
675 75 OLDS OMEG
CID
260
IHC= 285 PPM HEXANE
ICOUCT] 3-8
ICO[SPEC]= N/A
INOX = 49
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANC
689 75 PLYM DUST
%CQ
%CO
PPM
E
225
IHC= 220 PPM HEXANE
ICOUCT] = 6.0
ICQ[SPEC]= 0,3
INOX = 60
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANC
690 75 PLYM VALI
$CO
%CQ
PPM
E
225
IHC= 75 PPM HEXANE
ICOtACT] = 1.8
ICO[SPEC]= 0.3
INOX ^ 83
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANC
5&CO
$CO
PPM
E
TEST TYPE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
H
2.
1 .
1 .
1 .
1 .
EFF
2.
0.
0.
1 .
0.
4.
2.
3-
3.
3.
EFF
3.
2.
2.
2.
2.
4.
3-
3.
3.
3.
EFF
5,
2.
2.
4.
3.
--GRAMS PER MILE
C CO C02
53
45
30
97
63
00
37
78
15
82
78
90
53
80
46
03
13
51
56
42
53
34
43
91
61
71
55
62
07
22
54
40
29
47
40
42
14
21
27
21
61
56
57
58
57
43
33
37
38
36
103
103
88
103
99
114
85
78
99
89
• 3
.6
.5
. 1
.4
.3
. 1
.4
.6
.9
.0
. 1
.4
.5
.5
.7
.5
.4
.4
.7
.3
.4
. 1
.3
.2
.5
. 1
.8
. 1
.4
551
513
482
531
512
625
642
568
634
618
405
426
370
416
406
416
450
391
434
427
458
403
399
429
413
497
449
425
472
453
.8
.2
.1
.7
.7
.4
.0
.6
. 1
.6
.3
.2
.9
.2
.8
.4
.8
.5
.3
.6
.3
.7
.0
.9
.7
.8
.6
.7
.7
.0
NOXC
2
0
2
1
1
2
0
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
.85
• 96
• 59
.86
• 79
.00
.66
.62
• 30
.20
.74
.26
.69
.49
.47
.78
.40
.76
.58
.57
.71
.25
.59
.47
•4"
.52
.13
o 1
.23
1 1
.32
.2
HPO
FUEL
ECON
"ill
15,3
* ' J
16.7
11.5
15.3
12.1
13.3
11.7
13.0
13.5
17.2
16.5
18.8
1T.1
17.5
17-9
17.*
h
19-'
17.T
t fi ft
18.0
14.0
4 C '•
15."
<£ i
ID. 2
1U
15-3
1? 8
\t'v
15 0
i j '
15-5
i j
It?
C-68
-------
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
N0t YR MAKE MODL
691 75 PLYM DUST
CID
225
IHC= 325 PPM HEXANE
ICOUCT] = 9-5
ICO[SPEC]= 0.3
INOX = 38
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANCE
691 75 PLYM FURY
*CO
%CO
PPM
360
IHC=1010 PPM HEXANE
ICO[ACT] = 9.7
ICO[SPEC]= 0.3
INOX = 14
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANCE
696 75 PONT FIRE
IHC= 325 PPM HEX
ICOUCT] = 7. •]
ICO[SPEC1= N/A
T \l f\ i»
I M n v
•*• "\J A = p *
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANCE
*CO
%CO
PPM
250
ANE
*CO
%CO
PPM
TEST TYPE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP *
r
HC
3.
2.
2.
3.
2.
EFF
3-
1 .
2.
2.
1 .
6.
5.
5.
6.
5.
EFF
4.
0.
2.
2.
1 .
3-
2.
1 .
2.
2.
EFF
2.
0.
0.
1 .
0.
79
37
28
05
64
44
24
08
29
92
90
32
18
07
61
00
85
00
36
81
46
39
93
90
48
83
18
70
45
87
3RAMS PER MILE
CO C02
60
63
47
61
58
60
40
47
50
46
132
122
102
127
118
89
23
67
55
49
90
71
45
80
68
71
1
18
34
20
.5
. 1
.0
.9
.2
.6
.6
.9
.2
.7
.2
.4
.0
. 1
.9
.6
.2
.7
.0
.0
.2
. 1
.4
.3
.0
. 1
.6
.8
.8
.6
462.
402.
405.
430.
415.
473.
452 .
419.
462.
447.
566.
545.
510.
555.
540.
661 .
684.
583-
673.
652.
426.
409
392.
417.
408.
468.
458.
417-
463-
449.
0
3
3
8
4
8
5
1
7
8
7
5
1
6
2
7
9
2
8
4
2
4
6
4
2
7
7
4
5
5
i
NOXC
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
.13
.66
.89
.88
.82
.98
.48
.83
.72
.68
.95
.09
.94
.50
.50
.45
.95
• 38
.19
.17
.64
.88
.91
.77
.84
.55
.16
.63
.87
.89
MPG
FUEL
ECON
15.6
17.4
18.3
16.5
17.2
15.3
17.1
17.7
16.2
16.8
11.1
11.8
12.9
11 .5
1 1.9
10.9
12.3
12.8
1 1.6
12. 1
15.3
16.8
18.9
16.1
17-0
15.1
19-2
19.8
17.0
18.3
C-69
-------
APPENDIX C.CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO. Y
698 7
IHC =
ICO[
ICOC
INOX
OTHE
AFTER
R MAKE MODL CID
5 PONT F
250 PPM
ACT] -
SPEC]=
-
R TESTS:
IRE 350
HEXANE
8.0 %CO
N/A *CO
25 PPM
MAINTENANCE
699 75 PONT LEMA 350
IHC =
ICO[
ICO[
INOX
OTHE
AFTER
700 7
IHC =
ICO[
ICO[
INOX
350 PPM
ACT] -
SPEC]=
R TESTS:
HEXANE
9-9 %CO
N/A %CQ
20 PPM
MAINTENANCE
5 PONT C
450 PPM
ACT] -
SPEC]=
_
ATA 400
HEXANE
7.5 *CO
N/A %CO
25 PPM
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER
MAINTENANCE
TEST TYPE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
^ C G* *^ D
I 5 r 1 r
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
GRAMS PER MI
HC CO C02
13-
7.
7-
10.
8.
EFF
8.
3-
4.
5.
4.
3-
2.
1 .
2.
2.
EFF
2.
0.
0.
1 .
1 .
17.
5.
4.
1 1 .
7.
EFF
14.
3.
3.
8.
5.
37
56
28
34
68
10
41
36
66
64
13
43
92
77
44
34
52
99
39
02
95
51
43
46
78
20
79
35
77
81
227
163
189
193
183
165
80
133
121
112
80
72
59
76
70
50
13
24
31
24
245
145
128
193
161
252
109
121
177
142
. 1
.4
.5
.9
.7
.5
.9
.4
.4
.6
.5
.9
.0
.5
.7
.0
.9
.7
.2
.3
.2
.8
.8
.4
.6
.0
.9
. 1
.9
.2
483.
476.
405.
479.
458.
493.
506.
416.
500.
479.
548.
573-
498.
561 .
548.
577.
603-
520.
590.
575.
513-
518.
487.
515.
508.
604.
659-
581 .
633-
626.
LE
9
2
4
9
5
9
3
8
3
3
3
8
4
6
0
1
3
2
7
2
6
1
4
9
8
7
4
3
2
9
NOXC
0.63
0.35
0.50
0.18
0.115
0.90
0.77
0.71
0.83
0.78
3.18
2.26
3.48
2.70
2.78
3.08
2.06
3-38
2.55
2.63
1.30
1.11
1.70
1.20
1.31
0.63
_ s r
0.05
n C 11
0.51*
n Cll
Q.54
HPO
FUEL
EGOS
10.0
11 1
I 1 1 1
12.2
10.9
11.5
1U
13.8
13-?
12.5
13.2
13.0
12.1
11.5
12.?
13J
13.;
I1!, i
15-:
. fl
13-8
lU
4 1 r
1U
t n i.
12- »
4 A
10.-
1
8 5
Q,J
10.5
9.'
10-2
C-70
-------
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
N0. YR MAKE MODL CID
701 76 PONT FIRE 400
IHC= 440 PPM HEXANE
ICOCACT] = 5.4 *CO
ICO[SPEC]= N/A *CO
INOX ^ 32 PPM
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANCE
705 75 DATS B210 85
IHC= 85 PPM HEXANE
ICOtACT] = 2.4 %CO
ICO[SPEC]= 2.0 %CO
INOX * 10 PPM
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANCE
7°9 75 OPEL STAW 116
IHC= 130 PPM HEXANE
ICO[ACT] = 6.4 *CO
ICO[SPEC]= 2.0 %CO
NOX = 70 PPM
OTHER TESTS-
AFTER MAINTENANCE >
TEST TYPE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP^
n
HC
3.
3.
3.
3.
3.
EFF
4.
2.
2.
3.
3.
3.
1 .
2.
2.
2.
EFF
3.
1 .
2.
2.
2.
4.
2.
2.
3.
2.
EFF
3-
2 .
2.
3.
2.
76
30
09
52
34
10
77
79
41
05
23
42
28
29
03
35
97
00
63
26
22
52
57
34
89
50
67
50
07
79
iRAMS PER MILE
CO C02
74
68
60
71
67
69
71
56
70
67
44
29
33
36
33
41
30
30
35
32
84
80
67
82
77
67
55
56
61
58
.3
. 1
.0
.0
. 1
.9
.4
.4
.7
.0
.8
.2
.7
.7
.6
. 1
.9
.4
.8
.9
.2
.3
.8
.2
.7
.8
.9
.6
.6
.5
550
554
500
552
539
629
613
551
621
599
291
316
263
304
296
310
319
267
314
303
359
394
328
377
368
373
414
340
394
385
. 1
.6
.8
.5
.0
.8
.0
.8
.0
.7
.5
. 1
.6
• 3
.7
. 1
.3
.6
.9
.3
.5
.0
.0
.5
.9
. 1
.0
.9
.4
.6
NOXC
2.
2.
2.
2.
2.
1 .
0.
1 .
1 .
1 .
2.
0.
1 .
1 .
1 .
2.
1 .
2.
2.
2.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
1 .
0.
0.
0.
0.
,49
,14
,66
31
35
36
85
21
10
06
12
88
93
47
42
88
50
52
16
06
92
70
81
80
77
12
78
96
94
90
MPG
FUEL
ECON
13
13
14
13
13
1 1
12
13
1 1
12
23
24
27
24
24
23
23
27
23
24
17
16
20
17
17
18
17
20,
17,
18,
. 1
.2
.7
. 1
.5
.8
. 1
.7
.9
.4
.8
.2
.4
.0
.9
.0
.7
.6
.4
.5
.6
.8
. 1
.2
.7
. 1
.4
.3
.7
.2
C-71
-------
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VE
NO
71
A
71
A
71
A
H
. YR MAKE MODL CID
3 75 TOYO CORO 134
IHC= 80 PPM HEXANE
ICOCACT] - 1 .2 %CO
ICO[SPEC]= N/A %CO
INOX = 35 PPM
OTHER TESTS:
FTER MAINTENANCE
4 75 VOLK SEDA 97
IHC= 165 PPM HEXANE
ICOUCT] 3.5 *CO
ICO[SPEC]= 2.0 %CQ
INOX 88 PPM
OTHER TESTS:
FTER MAINTENANCE
5 75 VOLK SEDA 97
IHC= 445 PPM HEXANE
ICO[ACT] 7.3 %CO
ICO[SPEC]= 2.0 %CQ
INOX . 40 PPM
OTHER TESTS:
FTER MAINTENANCE
TEST TYPE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
H
2.
1 .
1 .
2.
1 .
EFF
3-
1 .
1 .
2.
2.
3.
2.
2.
3.
2.
EFF
2.
1 .
1 .
2.
1 .
3.
2.
3-
2.
3-
EFF
2.
1 .
2.
2.
2.
--G
C
80
76
66
26
95
48
65
66
53
03
98
30
15
1 1
61
79
53
46
13
77
01
89
92
95
20
62
95
34
27
20
RAMS
CO
46.
32.
30.
39.
34 .
55.
31.
30.
43.
36.
43-
31 .
28.
36.
32.
34.
13-
15.
23.
18.
51 .
55.
48.
53.
52.
41 .
24.
52.
32.
35.
PE
7
5
5
3
8
4
9
0
1
2
0
1
5
8
8
2
7
8
5
5
2
7
0
6
7
5
1
2
4
4
R MI
C02
400.
427.
356.
414.
402.
406.
455.
376.
432.
423.
268.
292.
257.
281 .
278.
344.
398.
324.
372.
366.
262.
265.
236.
263-
256.
299-
323-
271 •
311.
304.
LE
8
7
6
8
8
4
7
0
1
8
6
8
7
2
2
6
1
0
5
9
3
0
0
7
6
0
1
5
6
0
NO
3.
1.
3.
2.
2.
3.
1.
3.
2.
2.
2.
1 .
2.
1.
1.
1 .
1.
1.
1.
1.
1 .
0.
1 .
1 .
1 .
1.
1.
1.
1 .
1 .
xc
65
34
39
15
38
71
38
67
51
19
35
36
03
83
75
98
11
65
52
43
76
99
24
36
22
60
17
f\ f\
09
i Q
3°
oil
24
HPS
FUEL
neon
18 »
' V | ^
18.}
21.7
18.J
19.1
17.6
17.1
20.1
17.5
18,2
25.5
25.^
28.1
25,*
26.]
21.8
20.9
25-1
21.3
-n i
22.1
25.2
, j, r
24.3
11 i
27-'
.b 1
24.'
,»r j
25.'
s
42
?4.6
t ^
A]! ((J
24.2
C-72
-------
ON
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
N0. YR MAKE MODL
CID
716 75 VOLK SEDA 97
IHC= 300 PPM HEXANE
ICOUCT] - 7.0
ICO[SPEC]= 2.5
INOX = 58
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANC
717 75 VOLK TRAN
%CQ
%CO
PPM
E
109
IHC= 480 PPM HEXANE
ICOUCT] - 7.0
ICO[SPEC]= 4.0
INOX _• 43
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANC
046 74 AMMO HORN
%CO
%CO
PPM
E
304
IHC = 225 PPM HEXANE
ICOUCT] . 2.5 *nn
!CO[SPEC]= 1 o
T H ^\ .. *
1 MM Y _
* " u A = 70
OTHER TESTS-
AFTER MAINTENANC
|V V W
%co
PPM
E
TEST TYPE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP%
r.
HC
4.
3.
2.
3-
3.
50
17
68
81
31
:RAMS PER MILE
CO C02
75
79
63
77
74
.4
.5
. 1
.5
.2
264.
292.
247.
279.
274.
.5
,6
.7
, 1
5
;<
NOXC
1 .04
0.67
0.84
0.
0.
.85
79
MPG
FUEL
ECON
22.3
20.8
25.0
21 .5
22. 1
EFF
3-
2.
2.
2.
2.
5.
4.
3-
4.
4.
EFF
3.
2.
3-
2.
2.
6.
4.
5.
5.
5.
EFF
6.
4.
4.
5.
4.
27
22
26
72
45
49
52
94
98
56
61
36
01
96
79
79
92
13
82
36
39
21
90
26
85
62
40
49
51
47
83
64
72
73
70
62
44
48
52
49
78
63
56
70
64
72
34
47
52
46
.8
.7
.5
.3
.7
.7
.5
.0
.7
.5
.2
.5
.9
.9
.3
.7
.6
.3
.8
.7
.6
.6
.6
.8
.0
314.
366.
307-
341.
339.
352.
386.
312.
369.
359.
447.
495.
401 .
472.
459.
492.
482.
452.
486.
475.
518.
554.
482.
537-
527-
2
7
8
5
8
2
0
7
8
0
0
4
1
3
7
0
0
2
8
9
7
5
3
4
5
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
1 .
1 .
0.
1 .
1 .
2.
2.
1 .
2.
1 .
4.
1 .
3.
2.
2.
4.
2.
4.
3.
3-
84
67
76
75
73
09
15
90
12
07
61
14
09
36
95
06
99
88
98
93
10
44
57
23
36
21 .0
20.3
22.6
20.6
21 .0
17.7
17.7
20.2
17.7
18.3
16.0
15.5
18.2
15.7
16.3
13-9
14.9
15.9
14.4
14.9
13-6
14.3
15.5
13.9
14.4
C-73
-------
APPENDIX C ,CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO. YR MAKE MODL CID
047 74 BUIC RIVI 455
IHC= 100 PPM
ICOUCT] 0
ICO[SPEC]= 0
INOX
OTHER TESTS:
HEXANE
.2 %CO
.3 *CO
89 PPM
AFTER MAINTENANCE
048 74 BUIC CENT 350
IHC= 200 PPM
ICO[ACT] = 0
ICO[SPEC]= 0
INOX
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENA
HEXANE
8 It O f\
lib u U
0 t C 0
40 PPM
NCE
049 74 CHEV VEGA 1 40
IHC= 300 PPM
ICO[ACT] = 7
ICO[SPEC]= 0
INOX
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENA
HEXANE
• 7 %CO
.5 *CO
82 PPM
NCE
TEST TYPE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
G
HC
5.
3-
4.
4.
4.
EFF
5.
3-
4.
4.
4.
4.
3.
3-
3.
3.
EFF
2.
1 .
2.
2.
1 .
3-
2.
2.
3-
2.
EFF
4.
2.
2.
3.
2.
32
93
1 1
60
26
34
40
57
33
12
02
19
81
59
53
87
58
10
19
99
65
75
51
18
87
40
49
41
41
86
RAMS P
CO
67
30
31
47
38
78
24
32
50
37
97
79
72
87
80
72
47
56
59
55
77
62
53
69
63
58
52
45
55
51
. 1
.0
.8
.8
. 1
.6
.6
. 1
.5
.8
.4
.0
. 1
.8
.9
.5
.9
.6
.6
.3
.3
.8
.6
.8
.3
.9
.4
.0
.5
.7
ER MI
C02
757.
737.
666.
746.
722.
771 .
774.
682.
773.
748.
558.
527.
484.
542.
522.
698.
695.
590.
696.
667.
395.
321 .
331-
357.
339.
386.
319.
314.
351.
331.
LE
6
0
3
9
0
6
6
4
2
9
0
6
7
2
2
0
8
6
9
6
4
8
8
0
7
4
4
0
5
7
NOXC
4
2
5
3
3
4
2
5
3
3
3
1
3
2
2
1
0
1
1
1
3
2
2
2
2
3
2
2
2
2
• 75
• 75
.27
.71
.85
• 34
.74
.15
.51
.73
.22
.45
.26
.30
.31
.53
.96
.57
.23
.25
.26
.07
.82
.64
.52
.05
.09
r f
.56
_• /"
.55
li n
,42
HPG
FUEL
BCOl
10.1
12.2
10,5
11.2
9.7
10.8
11.5
10.2
10,8
12.3
13.1
11.5
12.8
13.*
10.5
11.*
12.9
11.1
j n
Ml
16.8
..A I
20.1
ft A ft
20.9
. * f.
18, d
-------
APPENDIX C.CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
N0. YR MAKE MODL CID
050 74 CHEV MONT 350
IHC= 90 PPM HEXANE
ICOtACT] 1.3 *CO
ICO[SPEC]= 0.5 *CO
INOX 35 PPM
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANCE
051 74 CHEV NOVA 25.0
IHC= 90 PPM HEXANE
ICOtACT] = 1 .0 %CO
ICO[SPEC]= 0.3 $CO
INOX = 32 PPM
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANCE
°52 74 CHEV CAMA 350
IHC= 50 PPM HEXANE
ICOtACT] = 2.0 %CO
ICO[SPEC]= 0.5 *CO
INOY ~
NUX - 33 PPM
OTHER TESTS:
ApTER MAINTENANCE
TEST TYPE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
HC
62.02
3.67
6 .52
31 .60
16.46
EFF
5.
3-
4.
4.
4.
3.
2.
3.
3-
3-
EFF
5.
1 .
3.
3.
2.
6.
3.
3.
4.
4.
EFF
5.
3-
3-
4.
3-
28
82
78
52
38
78
53
33
13
00
04
98
03
44
89
10
37
71
68
03
57
03
33
25
63
3RAMS PER MILE
CO C02
407.2
85.6
117.3
239.5
160.4
82
29
62
55
49
73
44
57
58
54
84
32
46
57
46
113
91
76
102
91
102
60
68
80
71
.4
.8
. 1
.0
.4
.2
.5
.8
.2
.0
.8
. 1
. 1
.3
.8
.9
. 1
.5
.0
.8
.9
.4
.2
.7
.3
479.4
616.8
499.8
551 .0
556.6
563.5
611
501
588
571
442
498
385
471
456
437
474
393
457
445
634
628
537
631
604
601
621
535
612
594
.8
.0
.7
.6
.7
.6
.7
.9
• 3
.9
.7
.9
. 1
. 1
.2
.1
. 1
.0
.5
.6
.5
.6
.0
.0
r
NOXC
0.32
0.71
0.92
0.52
0.69
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
0
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
1
.40
.07
.36
.23
.22
.88
-34
.80
.60
.58
.71
.19
.05
.44
.53
.73
.77
.41
.23
.14
.45
.76
.17
.09
.01
MPG
FUEL
ECON
6.7
11.6
12.6
8.6
10.3
12
13
14
12
13
15
15
18
15
16
15
16
18
15
16
10
1 1
13
1 1
11
1 1
12
13
1 1
12
.5
.2
.5
.9
•4
.6
.4
.2
.5
. 1
. 1
.7
.6
.9
.8
.7
.3
• 3
.0
.7
.4
.2
.6
.8
.4
C-75
-------
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO. YR MAKE MODL CID
053 74 CHEV CHEL 350
IHC= 75 PPM HEXANE
ICOtACT] = 2.6 *CO
ICO[SPEC]= 0.5 %CO
INOX - 33 PPM
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANCE
054 74 CHEV CAPR 400
IHC= 200 PPM HEXANE
ICO[ACT] = 8.8 $CO
ICO[SPEC]= N/A %CO
INOX = 50 PPM
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANCE
055 74 DODG CHAR 318
IHC= 220 PPM HEXANE
ICOUCT] - 0.2 *CO
ICO[SPEC]= N/A *CO
INOX _ 53 PPM
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANCE
TEST TYPE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
H
3.
2.
3-
2.
2.
EFF
3-
1 .
2.
2.
2.
5.
5.
5.
5.
5.
EFF
5.
3.
4.
4.
4.
16.
10.
10.
13-
1 1 .
EFF
6.
4.
4.
5.
4.
--G
C
70
16
15
90
75
17
87
91
49
42
82
89
23
86
70
16
57
08
33
03
96
61
13
65
79
29
39
73
30
87
rRAMS
CO
117.
69.
84.
92.
83-
111.
39.
77.
73.
64.
155.
181 .
148.
168.
166.
96.
53-
79.
74.
69.
238.
174.
176.
205.
188.
98.
81 .
76.
89.
83.
P
6
9
0
7
6
7
1
2
8
4
4
1
1
8
8
0
8
3
0
4
3
4
2
0
1
7
4
6
7
7
ER M
CO
596
627
529
612
594
661
690
574
676
652
779
709
642
742
705
807
801
671
804
767
436
419
380
427
412
523
523
466
523
507
ILE
2
. 1
.2
.3
• 3
. 1
.4
.7
.1
.6
.8
.4
.3
.7
.8
.5
.5
.8
.9
.5
.5
.6
.0
.8
.4
.2
.8
.0
.1
.4
.6
N
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
1
oxc
•73
•63
.88
.68
.72
.74
.79
.93
.76
.82
.07
.12
.53
.58
.43
.25
.18
.76
.85
.72
.87
.13
.78
.64
.62
.69
f\ £
.95
f o
.53
31
1
?fi
. t 0
H
PO
EC
11
11
13
11
12
10
11
12
11
11
8
8
9
8
9
9
9
11
9
10
10
i f)
12
12
4 4
11
4 1
11
19
It
n
i j
iii
i n
13
i j
13
PC
EL
ON
• *
.1
.5
1 /
.1
.6
.1
.5
.7
.(
.1
.1
.5
.8
.5
.J
.0
.1
.9
,0
.5
A
.0
.]
1
,L
A
.5
9
,L
0
.3
7
i 1
.]
.8
.0
.6
C-76
-------
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
N0. YR MAKE MODL
056 74 DODG DART
CID
225
IHC= 320 PPM HEXANE
ICOtACT] = 7-1
ICOtSPEC]= 0.5
INOX - 52
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANC
057 74 FORD PINT
%CQ
%CO
PPM
E
122
IHC= 170 PPM HEXANE
ICOtACT] - 3.0
ICOtSPEC]= 0.5
INOX r 55
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANC
°58 74 FORD MAVE
%CO
%CO
PPM
E
302
IHC= 240 PPM HEXANE
ICOtACT] = 6.0 *rn
ICO[SPEC]= 0.5
NOX - YO
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANC
*
r* ^ ^
%CO
PPM
E
TEST TYPE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
i
HC
4.
3.
4.
4.
4.
93
63
23
25
06
}RAMS PER MILE
CO C02
86
72
80
79
77
.9
.6
.0
.5
.6
396
364
347
379
366
.2
.5
.6
.7
.4
f
NOXC
1
1
1
1
1
.96
.12
.72
.52
.46
MPG
FUEL
ECON
16.2
18.1
18.2
17. 1
17.7
EFF
4.
2.
3.
3-
3.
5.
4.
3.
4.
4.
EFF
4.
3.
3-
4.
3.
5.
4.
4.
5.
5.
EFF
5.
4.
4.
4.
4.
45
75
86
56
40
68
05
89
83
34
88
45
23
14
69
98
75
74
34
00
60
42
72
98
74
103
58
77
79
72
73
59
46
66
58
63
41
34
52
44
1 17
130
109
124
121
88
84
76
86
83
. 1
• 3
.6
.8
.8
.8
.0
.7
.1
.7
.9
.3
.4
. 1
.0
.2
. 1
.0
.0
.7
.8
.5
.9
.6
.4
444
457
408
451
441
292
308
278,
300.
296.
279.
303-
273-
292.
290.
516.
496.
446.
506.
487.
497.
486.
442.
491 •
476.
. 1
.8
.6
.3
.6
.3
. 1
. 1
,6
7
7
9
4
3
6
8
7
7
3
2
2
0
7
4
5
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
0
1
1
1
2
1
2
1
1
.40
.08
.39
• 23
• 23
.71
.39
.24
.54
.68
.16
.70
.76
.92
.08
.41
.73
.30
.06
.03
.28
.01
.07
.62
.56
14.3
15.9
16.4
15. 1
15.7
20.8
21.5
24.4
21 . 1
22.0
22.4
23-4
26.3
22.9
23.9
12.3
12.4
14.0
12.4
12.8
13-6
14.0
15.3
13.8
14.3
C-77
-------
APPENDIX C.CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO. YR MAKE MODL CID
059 74 FORD MAVE 250
IHC= 300 PPM HEXANE
ICOtACT] 7.9 %CO
ICO[SPEC]= 0.3 *CO
INOX - 38 PPM
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANCE
060 74 FORD LTD 400'
IHC= 320 PPM HEXANE
ICOtACT] - 3.0 %CO
ICO[SPEC]= 0.4 *CO
INOX - 42 PPM
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANCE
061 74 FORD LTD 400
IHC= 80 PPM HEXANE
ICOCACT] - 1 .5 *CO
ICO[SPEC]= 0.4 *CO
INOX = 212 PPM
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANCE
TEST TYPE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
4
3
3
3
3
EF
5
2
3
4
3
5
3
4
4
4
EF
4
2
3
3
3
4
3
3
3
3
EF
4
2
3
3
3
G
HC
.00
.54
.75
.76
.69
F
.97
.86
.86
.35
.77
.68
.77
.28
.68
• 30
F
.32
.84
• 63
.54
.36
.20
.00
.49
.57
.38
F
.51
.97
.38
.71
.40
'RAM;
Ci
72
77
68
75
74
92
63
72
77
71
92
55
65
73
66
100
58
79
79
73
82
51
47
66
56
84
47
46
64
54
S P
0
.5
.7
.5
.2
. 1
. 1
.5
.7
.2
.9
.6
.5
.9
.3
.0
.9
.8
.8
.0
.2
.3
.2
.3
. 1
.5
.2
.0
.9
.8
.6
ER M
CO
422
390
363
406
389
440
469
387
455
441
585
572
514
578
559
622
687
544
656
635
667
687
588
677
656
667
678
597
673
654
ILE
2
.6
.9
.0
.0
.8
.1
.4
.2
.4
.0
• 3
.8
.1
.8
.3
.5
.5
.1
.4
.0
.6
.0
.5
.7
.1
.6
.9
.7
.5
.4
N
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
1
0
0
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
0
1
1
2
1
2
2
2
2
1
2
2
2
oxc
.70
.06
.50
• 37
• 31
.22
.76
.07
.98
.91
.99
.09
.15
.52
.29
.31
.21
.91
.27
.16
.99
.91
.80
.42
.38
.71
.57
r- ll
.51
A /)
.12
nl
.07
H
FU
EC
16
16
18
16
1?
H
15
IT
15
15
11
13
14
12
13
11
11
13
11
11
11
. t
11
13
11
1
in
]U
<1
1 1
13
l J
11
) '
H
PG
El
OR
.2
q
• ;
J
.J
.1
.7
•3
•3
.0
.1
.9
.1
.1
.5
.1
.2
,2
.0
.2
,1
.0
i
,»
.
9
,L
1
,\
_3
j
,0
.]
.8
C-78
-------
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE
DENVER
PROCEDURE
AND AFTER
RESULTS
MAINTENANCE
VEH
N0. YR MAKE MODL
062 74 LINC CONT
CID
460
IHC= 210 PPM HEXANE
ICOtACT] = 5.5
ICO[SPEC]= N/A
INOX - 55
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANCE
063 74 MERC MONT
*CO
%CO
PPM
302
IHC= 225 PPM HEXANE
ICOUCT] = 2.5
ICO[SPEC]= 0.5
INOX - 65
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANCE
064 74 OLDS CUTL
IHC= 170 PPM HEX
ICO[ACT] =22
ICO[SPEC]= o!2
INOY I r>
j- a
-------
APPENDIX C.CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO. YR
065 74
IHC =
ICOU
MAKE MODL CID
OLDS DELT 350
130 PPM
CT] 3
ICO[SPEC]= 0
INOX
OTHER
AFTER
066 74
IHC =
ICOU
TESTS:
HEXANE
.4 %CO
.2 *CO
71 PPM
MAINTENANCE
OLDS 98
175 PPM
CT] = 3
ICO[SPEC]= 0
INOX
OTHER
AFTER
067 74
IHC =
ICO[A
TESTS:
MAINTENA
455
HEXANE
.6 *CO
.5 56CO
57 PPM
NCE
PLYM SATE 318
350 PPM
CT] = 0
ICO[SPEC]= 0
INOX
OTHER
AFTER
—
TESTS:
HEXANE
.8 %CO
.5 ?CO
51 PPM
MAINTENANCE
TEST TYPE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
GRAMS PER MI
HC CO C02
7.
4.
5.
5.
5.
EFF
7.
4.
5.
5.
5.
4.
3.
3.
4.
3-
EFF
4 .
3.
3-
3.
3.
7.
4.
5.
6.
5.
EFF
6.
4 .
4.
5.
4.
18
57
21
82
28
62
26
45
87
28
46
57
63
00
77
41
21
20
78
45
78
54
19
09
38
20
19
28
15
63
176
92
117
132
116
159
43
90
98
80
79
50
46
64
55
59
29
30
43
35
69
47
37
58
49
77
47
40
61
51
.2
.5
.5
.6
.6
.4
.3
.3
.8
.0
. 1
.7
.5
.3
.4
. 1
.3
.3
.6
.7
.6
.9
.0
.3
.4
.2
.4
.6
.6
.7
629.
679.
573.
655.
640.
620.
677-
574.
650.
637.
690.
695.
639.
693-
679.
730.
721 .
649-
726.
703.
539.
537.
490.
538.
525.
578.
565-
530-
571-
558.
LE
8
5
6
7
4
9
3
5
3
6
6
4
2
1
1
8
7
2
1
8
0
4
7
2
0
0
9
2
7
7
NOXC
1.67
1.77
1.81
1.72
1.77
2.17
2.96
2.67
2.58
2.72
4.35
2.44
4.01
3-35
3.26
5-19
3.06
5-07
4.08
4.05
3-59
1.82
3-59
2.67
2.67
2.35
r- 0
1.58
_ rt
2.77
A C
1.95
n £
2.00
HPG
FUEL
EGOS
9.5
> • J
10. i
11.5
10.1
10.6
9.3
11.?
12,1
10, i
11.1
10,1
11.3
12.3
11.0
11. «
10-f
11. •
/
12.6
11.0
t t t
11.5
4 li /
I'M
15.'
., i
13-'
. k i
11J
12>3
13-*
1 J
ii'd
ijj
> j
C-80
-------
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VFH
N0. YR MAKE MODL CID
068 74 PLYM DUST 225
IHC= 270 PPM HEXANE
ICOtACT] = 7.4 *CO
ICO[SPEC]= 0.5 %CO
INOX 73 PPM
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANCE
069 71 PONT BONN 400
IHC= 140 PPM HEXANE
ICOtACT] = 2.6 JCO
ICO[SPEC]= 0.3 %CO
INOX _ 58 PPM
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANCE
°70 74 PONT LEMA 350
IHC= 250 PPM HEXANE
ICOtACT] = 7.0 %CQ
ICO[SPEC]= 0.2 %CO
INO* = 60 PPM
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANCE
TEST TYPE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
r
HC
4.
3.
3-
3-
3.
42
1 1
44
74
47
3RAMS PER MILE
CO C02
78.7
61 .2
57.9
69.6
63.9
438,
410,
391,
424.
411 .
• 3
.8
.0
,0
,1
i
NOXC
3.12
2.11
3.32
2.59
2.65
MPG
FUEL
ECON
15.4
17.2
18.0
16.3
17.0
EFF
4.
2.
4.
3.
3-
5.
4.
4.
5.
4.
EFF
5.
4.
4.
4.
4.
5.
4.
5.
5.
5.
EFF
5.
4.
4.
4.
4.
63
21
10
37
22
67
47
32
04
67
41
27
52
81
57
58
89
23
22
13
46
22
79
82
63
61
32
46
46
42
107
72
40
89
70
127
27
27
75
48
93
71
74
82
76
83
38
42
60
48
.8
.8
. 1
.7
.4
.7
.3
.3
.3
.9
.6
.4
.4
.4
.0
.9
.2
. 1
.0
.7
.2
.7
.5
.0
.9
468.
465.
410.
467.
451 .
701 .
665.
589.
682.
651 .
680.
699.
596.
690.
667.
719.
659.
558.
688.
644.
713.
679-
575.
695.
658.
7
4
4
0
1
2
1
5
4
9
5
7
9
5
7
4
1
3
0
0
0
5
8
5
1
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
2
2
.52
.03
.56
.27
.28
.71
.55
.87
.63
.94
• 37
.71
.86
.55
.96
.50
.21
.98
• 35
.48
.24
.43
.64
.34
.72
15
16
17
16
16
10
1 1
13
10
1 1
9
1 1
13
10
1 1
10
1 1
12
10
1 1
10
11
13
1 1
1 1
.3
.9
.9
. 1
.8
.0
.2
.3
.6
.4
.9
.7
.6
.8
.7
.0
.3
.8
.6
.4
.3
.8
.5
.0
.8
C-81
-------
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO. YR MAKE MODL CID
071 74 DATS 61
IHC=1300 PPM
ICOUCT] - 0
ICO[SPEC]= 3
INOX
OTHER TESTS:
0 119
HEXANE
2i r* n
a ^ \J
0*£ c n
a \s ^J
12 PPM
AFTER MAINTENANCE
072 74 MAZD RX
IHC= 275 PPM
ICOCACT] - 1
ICO[SPECJ= 2
INOX
OTHER TESTS:
3 70
HEXANE
. 3 %CO
.0 %CO
15 PPM
AFTER MAINTENANCE
073 74 TOYO CELI 97
IHC= 350 PPM
ICO[ACT] = 6
ICO[SPEC]= 4
INOX
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENA
HEXANE
.4 %CQ
.0 %CQ
50 PPM
NCE
TEST TYPE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
GRAMS PER MILE
HC CO C02 NOXC
4 .
4.
3.
4.
4.
EFF
5.
3-
4.
4.
4.
9.
5.
9.
7.
7-
EFF
7.
7.
8.
7.
7.
4.
3-
3-
4.
3.
EFF
3-
3-
3-
3.
3-
84
49
55
66
30
27
83
61
52
34
21
40
44
23
29
53
07
15
29
46
71
92
40
30
94
96
49
46
71
58
105
51
63
77
66
1 10
53
67
80
68
74
56
85
65
68
64
65
66
65
65
48
63
31
56
51
38
44
20
41
36
.0
.6
.9
.2
.0
.7
.3
.2
.8
.9
.7
.9
.2
.4
• 3
.6
.3
.8
.0
.6
. 1
.2
.0
.0
.3
. 1
.3
.4
.4
.5
329
331
287
330
318
332
345
290
338
327
502
535
406
519
493
572
532
445
551
517
349
338
327
343
337
359
361
340
360
355
.9
. 1
.2
.5
.9
.2
.1
.8
.9
.6
.4
.0
.4
.4
.2
.4
.8
.7
.7
.2
.5
.0
.7
.5
.5
.5
.8
.9
.7
.6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
1
2
1
1
2
1
2
1
A
1
• 71
.65
.82
.69
.71
.76
.70
.95
.73
.78
.80
.1)0
.86
.59
.61
.79
.37
.78
.57
.57
.00
.26
.11
.62
.61
.29
*I u
A f\
.29
of.
, 00
Of.
, 00
HPG
FUEL
ECON
1? I;
1 I 1 1
20 8
•» v i U
22.2
19.0
20.3
17.0
20.1
21.6
18.5
19.?
13.1
13-6
15.6
13.8
11.2
12.1
13-5
15- *
13-1
* t 0
13-8
20.2
n 1
19.1
Art 0
22. J
19-5
-, L
20. o
,
?0 1
?3.'
t J
20.3
20.9
C-82
-------
APPENDIX C.CONT'D
ON
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST
INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE
DENVER
PROCEDURE
AND AFTER
RESULTS
MAINTENANCE
VEH
NO. YR MAKE MODL CID
07H 74 VOLK SEDA 97
IHC= 225 PPM HEXANE
ICO[ACT] - 3-8 *CO
ICO[SPEC]= 3.0 *CO
INOX - 85 PPM
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANCE
075 74 VOLK SEDA 97
IHC= 1 15 PPM HEXANE
ICOUCT] - 6.0 %CO
ICO[SPEC]= 2.0 *CO
INOX = 52 PPM
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANCE
352 74 CHRY NEWP 400
IHC= 600 PPM HEXANE
ICOUCT] = 8.0 *CO
— -__ ^* • V ff \S ^/
ICO[SPEC]= 0.5 tCO
INOX = 27 PPM
OTHER TESTS:
ApTER MAINTENANCE
TEST TYPE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
HC CO C02 NOXC
5.
3*
3-
4.
4.
EFF
5.
4.
4.
4.
4.
5.
4.
4.
5.
4.
EFF
5.
4.
3-
4.
4.
7.
6.
6.
6.
6.
EFF
7.
3.
3.
5.
4.
34
98
35
63
09
39
43
20
89
56
68
58
09
1 1
67
67
17
54
89
31
36
34
13
83
49
98
43
98
61
52
65
59
53
62
58
61
56
52
58
56
71
65
57
68
64
60
39
42
49
44
121
136
109
129
125
1 10
72
72
90
80
.2
.2
. 1
.1
.8
.2
. 1
.2
.5
.1
.7
.6
.0
.5
.5
.6
.5
. 1
.6
.5
.0
.4
. 1
.0
.8
.5
.8
.4
.8
.4
244
253
234
249
246
268
266
243
267
260
246
249
232
248
244
259
276
242
268
263
649
632
583
640
622
664
704
614
685
671
.2
.9
. 1
.3
.5
.0
. 1
. 1
.0
.2
.6
.3
.2
.0
. 1
.3
.8
.5
.4
.8
.5
.7
. 1
.8
.6
.4
.3
.6
.2
.6
2.31
1 .33
2.21
1
1
.80
.77
2.61
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
2
1
1
2
1
2
2
2
2
1
2
1
1
.18
.22
.87
.76
.92
.08
.56
.48
.39
.09
.42
.02
.74
.72
.50
.73
.56
.10
.1 1
.27
.64
.29
.94
.94
r UC.L
ECON
24.4
24.7
27.0
24
25
23
24
26
23
24
23
24
26
23
24
23
25
27
24
25
10
10
1 1
10
10
10
10
12
10
10
.6
.2
.3
. 1
.2
.7
.5
.5
.2
.5
.9
.6
.8
.2
.7
.5
.5
.3
.2
.5
.3
.6
.3
.7
.0
.5
.9
C-83
-------
APPENDIX C.CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO. YR MAKE MODL CID
354 74 FORD ELIT 351
IHC= 350 PPM
ICOUCT] - 8
ICO[SPEC]= 0
INOX =
OTHER TESTS:
HEXANE
.4 %CQ
.5 *CO
50 PPM
AFTER MAINTENANCE
721 74 AMMO GREM 232
IHC= 180 PPM
ICOUCT] = 10
ICO[SPEC]= 1
INOX
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENA
HEXANE
0 ICO
.5 %CO
21 PPM
NCE
724 74 BUIC APOL 350
IHC= 540 PPM
ICOUCT] = 9
ICO[SPEC]= 0
INOX
OTHER TESTS:
HEXANE
• 9 %CQ
• 3 *CO
28 PPM
AFTER MAINTENANCE
TEST TYPE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
GRAMS PER MI
HC CO C02
8.
6.
7.
7.
6.
EFF
10.
5.
7.
7.
6.
9.
7.
5.
8.
7.
EFF
8.
5.
4.
7.
5.
7.
7.
6.
7.
7.
EFF
3.
2.
3.
3.
3.
20
28
23
20
93
53
16
63
73
94
44
36
60
36
31
78
48
68
06
94
89
02
50
44
06
95
82
24
36
16
112
121
93
117
112
87
57
60
71
64
68
94
53
81
77
73
81
55
77
72
125
162
101
144
138
65
29
35
47
38
.8
.3
.7
.2
.0
.2
.5
.5
.7
.4
.2
.0
.4
.6
.6
.5
.9
.1
.9
.9
.6
.3
.8
.8
.3
.9
.9
.6
. 1
.9
577.
569.
506.
573.
554.
554.
559.
496.
556.
541 .
404.
408.
363.
406.
395.
426.
410.
369.
418.
402.
578.
500.
490.
537.
513-
692.
674.
598.
683-
657.
LE
4
9
0
5
0
3
3
0
9
0
3
6
8
5
5
5
5
9
2
7
0
9
1
8
8
1
7
6
0
5
NOXC
2
1
1
1
1
3
1
2
2
2
2
0
1
1
1
2
1
2
1
1
1
0
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
.21
.24
• 77
.70
.59
.81
• 71
.75
.72
.43
.32
.93
.93
.59
.49
.38
.17
.35
.75
.74
.81
.71
.80
.24
.23
it
.9^
nrt
.09
£ 3
.03
.67
MPG
FUEL
ECON
11. *
1U
13-1
11.*
11.8
12.2
13-3
14.*
12.8
13.4
16.4
15.3
19.1
15.8
16J
15.&
15-9
18.8
* r 0
15.'
.ft
16. &
11.1
1 1 ll
11.1
4 0 1
13«Z
11.3
,, g
ii'0
11 0
II"
12-1
13-3
i j
11.*
12-2
C-84
-------
APPENDIX C.CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE
DENVER
PROCEDURE
AND AFTER
RESULTS
MAINTENANCE
VEH
NO. YR MAKE MODL CID
728 71 CHEV VEGA 140
1 "
IHC= 330 PPM HEXANE
ICOtACT] = 4.0 *CO
ICO[SPEC]= 0.5 *CO
INOX = 99 PPM
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANCE
731 71 CHEV NOVA 350
IHC= 350 PPM HEXANE
ICO[ACT] = 1 .2 *CO
ICO[SPEC]= 0.5 *CO
INOX 50 PPM
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANCE
?32 71 CHEV NOVA 350
IHC=2000 PPM HEXANE
icnr CT] " 10'° *co
INOY PEC-'= °-5 *C0
X - 30 PPM
OTHER
AFTER MAINTENANCE
TEST TYPE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
r
HC
4.
3.
3-
4.
3.
EFF
4.
2.
3.
3.
3.
6.
4.
4.
5.
5.
EFF
5.
4.
4.
4.
4.
1 1 .
16.
10.
14.
14.
EFF
1 1.
12.
8.
11 .
11 .
66
77
70
20
94
87
85
13
81
34
33
77
75
52
08
77
16
61
93
61
60
88
90
35
16
48
19
78^
85
1 1
•RAMS PER MILE
CO C02
100
91
83
96
91
84
43
50
63
53
80
66
62
72
67
72
46
70
59
58
102
149
84
126
122
109
133
103
121
119
.8
.9
.4
.2
.4
.7
.7
• 3
.3
.9
.0
.0
.6
.7
-9
.7
.8
.3
.2
.6
.0
.7
.8
.9
.2
.0
.0
.1
.5
.9
360
307
302
333
317
380
344
329
361
347
558
531
476
544
522
575
594
500
585
565
568
500
505
533
515
577
512
494
543
521
.8
.7
.9
. 1
.3
.2
.6
.7
.7
.9
.6
.8
.7
.6
.3
.7
.7
.6
.6
. 1
. 1
.7
.5
.0
.9
.2
.8
.6
.6
. 1
NOXC
1
0
1
1
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
2
0
2
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
.67
.60
.06
. 12
.95
.88
.13
.46
.49
.37
.12
.46
.02
.77
.75
.04
.62
.97
.82
.80
.26
.80
.40
.50
.53
.70
.46
.29
.05
.94
MPG
FUEL
ECON
16
19
19
17
18
16
21
21
18
20
12
13
15
13
13
12
13
14
12
13
1 1
1 1
13
11
11
1 1
1 1
13
1 1
11
.6
. 1
.9
.8
.7
.8
.0
.2
.8
.0
.6
.6
.0
. 1
.8
.5
.0
.2
.8
.2
.6
.2
.2
.4
.8
.3
.7
.0
.5
.9
C-85
-------
APPENDIX C.CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO. YR MAKE MODL CID
741 74 FORD PINT
122
IHC= 330 PPM HEXANE
ICOUCT] = 3.2
ICO[SPEC]= 0.5
INOX = 28
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANCE
743 74 FORD PINT
*CO
%CQ
PPM
140
IHC= 340 PPM HEXANE
ICOtACT] = 8.0
ICO[SPEC]= 0.1
INOX - 34
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANCE
744 74 FORD PINT
%CQ
%CO
PPM
140
IHC= 300 PPM HEXANE
ICOUCT] - 10.0
ICO[SPEC]= 0.1
INOX . 25
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANCE
%CO
JCO
PPM
TEST TYPE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
G
HC
6.
4.
4.
5.
4.
EFF
6.
4.
4.
5.
4.
9.
7.
6.
8.
7.
EFF
8.
5.
5.
7.
6.
7.
5.
5.
6.
5.
67
57
19
58
90
62
47
12
50
81
45
74
41
56
73
92
98
12
39
35
15
65
06
37
80
EFF
6.
3.
3-
4.
4.
28
62
93
89
25
RAMS PER MILE
CO C02 NOXC
89
51
46
70
58
96
46
49
70
57
134
135
106
134
127
125
105
82
115
103
118
1 11
85
114
105
121
90
83
105
94
.7
.8
.5
.0
.2
.5
.3
.7
.3
.5
.2
.3
.1
.8
.1
.7
.4
.4
.1
.3
.6
.5
.8
.9
.9
. 1
.2
.0
.0
.6
284
284
266
284
279
311
333
297
323
319
284
266
260
275
268
302
308
278
305
298
304
286
263
295
283
355
383
334
369
364
.7
.6
.2
.6
.6
.5
.6
.6
.0
.2
.8
.8
.5
.4
.8
.1
.2
.7
.3
.9
.6
.4
.7
.1
.9
.2
.1
.1
.7
.0
1
1
2
1
1
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.47
.17
.01
.31
.46
.99
.91
.24
.95
.01
.44
.25
.50
.34
.36
.51
.30
.57
.40
.42
.87
.52
.78
.68
.66
.82
54
1
•7 £
.70
AR
'
'if U
FUEL
ECOH
19J
' * /
23.1
«/ • j
25.2
21.5
23.0
18.3
21.1
22.8
19-1
20.9
16.9
17.6
19.8
17.3
18.0
/ fl
16.8
18.0
20.9
* o h
18.'
17-3
-------
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
N0. YR MAKE MODL CID
7118 71 FORD MAVE 302
IHC= 630 PPM HEXANE
ICOtACT] = 3-9 *CO
ICO[SPEC]= 0.5 %CO
INOX = 55 PPM
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANCE
753 74 FORD STAW 400
IHC= 130 PPM HEXANE
ICOUCT] = 1 .3 %CO
ICO[SPEC]= 0.4 *CO
INOX = 72 PPM
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANCE
75? 71 OLDS CUTL 350
IHC = 200 PPM HEXANE
ICOUCT] - 1|.2 %CQ
TJ^SPEC]= 0.5 %CQ
NOX = 56 PPM
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANCE
TEST TYPE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
n
HC
7.
5.
7.
6.
6.
EFF
5.
3-
3.
4.
3-
12.
22.
6.
17.
15.
EFF
9.
7.
6.
8.
7.
5.
5.
4.
5.
5.
EFF
6.
4.
4.
5.
5.
09
10
10
05
05
17
05
76
07
68
88
06
41
67
90
65
56
44
56
68
89
09
64
48
13
81
76
4V
74
09
IRAMS PER MILE
CO C02
31
56
24
44
42
37
31
18
34
29
147
126
117
136
128
105
58
83
80
74
77
85
55
81
75
88
37
54
62
52
.6
.0
. 1
.3
• 3
.3
.7
. 1
.4
.2
.6
.9
.3
.8
.6
. 1
.5
.4
.8
.9
.3
.2
.9
.4
.6
.8
.8
.7
.2
.9
473
455
429
464
452
492
492
446
492
480
672
736
648
706
699
747
788
665
769
746
635
621
564
627
608
709
735
633
722
702
. 1
.8
.4
. 1
. 1
.8
.6
.3
.7
.0
.9
.7
.8
. 1
.6
.7
.6
.0
.0
.5
. 1
. 1
.7
.8
.6
.7
.0
.5
.9
. 1
NOXC
4
2
5
3
3
3
1
3
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
2
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
.99
.13
• 39
.50
.61
.47
.76
.67
.58
.63
.84
.23
• 39
.52
.40
.24
.51
.74
.86
.72
.25
.42
.55
.82
.90
.82
.51
.92
.66
.69
MPG
FUEL
ECON
16
15
18
16
16
15
16
18
15
16
9
8
10
9
9
9
9
10
9
10
1 1
1 1
13
1 1
1 1
10
11
12
10
1 1
.3
.9
. 1
. 1
.5
.6
. 1
.2
.9
.5
.4
.8
.4
. 1
.3
.4
.8
.9
.6
.0
.4
.5
.3
.5
.9
.2
.0
. 1
.6
. 1
C-87
-------
APPENDIX C.CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO. YR MAKE MODL
758 74 OLDS C
IHC= 125 PPM
ICOUCTj =
ICO[SPEC]=
INOX
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTEN
UTL
CID
350
HEXANE
0.6
0.5
48
ANC
760 74 PLYM DUST
IHC= 270 PPM
ICOUCT] =
ICO[SPEC]=
INOX =
OTHER TESTS:
%CO
%CO
PPM
E
225
HEXANE
6.2
0.5
70
AFTER MAINTENANC
761 74 PLYM DUST
IHC= 400 PPM
ICOUCT] =fg,
ICO[SPEC]=
INOX
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTEN
%CO
%CO
PPM
E
318
HEXANE
6.9
0.5
32
ANC
?co
*co
PPM
E
TEST TYPE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
GRAMS PER MI
HC CO C02
6
5
5
5
5
EF
6
6
5
6
6
4
3
4
4
4
EF
4
2
3
3
3
5
4
4
5
4
EF
4
2
3
3
3
.13
.35
.07
.72
.43
F
.59
.12
.46
.34
.04
.95
.94
.36
.42
.26
F
.06
.80
.74
.40
.32
.68
.66
.30
. 15
.77
F
.87
.94
.26
.86
.42
106
36
58
70
57
114
25
66
67
54
86
75
72
80
77
66
40
55
53
49
56
92
44
75
72
73
54
46
63
56
.6
.8
.0
.2
.0
.3
.1
.3
.8
.7
.6
.7
.8
.9
.2
.5
.6
.1
.0
.9
.5
.8
.4
.4
. 1
.9
.4
.3
.7
.2
610.
632.
548.
621.
604.
637.
654.
574.
646.
629.
430.
370.
374.
399.
383-
444.
411 .
389-
427-
412.
546.
486.
478.
515.
496.
568.
575-
507.
572.
555-
LE
1
4
0
7
8
5
5
5
4
2
3
5
3
1
8
7
6
2
4
3
2
9
6
3
8
6
4
5
2
5
NOXC
1.2?
1.23
1.59
1.25
1.31
1.20
1 .21
1.10
1.22
1 .27
6.05
2.19
1.03
4.19
3.61
5.01
2.16
2.81
3-52
2.93
6.52
3-62
6.81
5.01
5.09
* 4
2.11
1 .09
A f\
2.10
. r 0
1 .5°
1 .5
HPG
FUEL
EC0N
11.1
12.5
13-5
11.8
12.5
10.6
12.1
12.8
11.5
12.1
15.2
17-7
17.1
16.1
17-1
15-8
18.3
18.2
nf.
.0
A H 1
17-1
. 1 i
13-|
15-
13.'
ill 7
11.'
12-7
It * '
13.2
' J
15-°
i J
13."
i «•
C-88
-------
APPENDIX C.CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE
DENVER
PROCEDURE
AND AFTER
RESULTS
MAINTENANCE
VEH
N0. YR MAKE MODL CID
762 74 PLYM FRY3 360
| V t-
IHC= 130 PPM HEXANE
ICOUCT] = 2.6 *CO
ICO[SPEC]= 0.5 %CO
INOX = 30 PPM
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANCE
765 74 PONT LEMA 350
IHC= 335 PPM HEXANE
ICOUCT] = 7.9 %CO
ICO[SPEC]= N/A *CO
INOX _ 40 PPM
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANCE
7?0 74 COLT SEDA 98
JHC= 740 PPM HEXANE
XCO[ACT] = 9.8 %co
ICO[SPEC]= 3 s *rn
INOX ~
* = 22 PPM
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANCE
.
TEST TYPE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
r.
HC
7.
5.
5-
6.
6.
EFF
7.
4.
4.
6.
5.
8.
6.
6.
7.
6.
EFF
6.
5 .
6.
5.
5.
3.
3.
2.
3.
3.
EFF
3-
3.
3.
3.
3.
84
91
91
83
31
49
74
98
06
37
78
45
62
56
97
39
24
65
79
86
92
71
93
81
54
90
03
43^
45
32
'RAMS PER MILE
CO C02
133
116
103
124
116
94
65
66
79
71
135
118
94
126
115
86
38
51
61
51
56
62
49
59
57
58
62
51
60
58
• 3
. 1
.0
.3
. 1
.0
.3
.7
.0
.6
.2
.2
.7
.3
.3
.7
• 3
.2
.5
.8
• 3
.7
.4
.7
.8
. 1
.4
.6
.3
.6
605
576
540
590
572
617
644
569
631
618
637
577
520
606
574
663
651
553
657
627
266
267
252
267
263
278
273
249
276
268
.4
.4
.7
• 3
.6
.8
.6
.0
.8
.4
.5
.2
.4
. 1
. 1
.6
.0
.6
.0
.0
.9
.5
.5
.2
.3
.3
.9
.9
.0
.3
NOXC
2
1
2
2
2
2
1
2
2
2
1
1
2
1
2
1
2
3
2
2
2
1
2
2
2
1
0
1
1
1
.54
.59
.82
.05
. 12
.55
.98
.72
.25
.30
.55
.71
.96
.64
.02
.93
. 17
.65
.05
.52
.77
.86
.89
.29
.32
.39
.84
.34
. 10
.09
MPG
FUEL
ECON
10
1 1
12
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
12
1 1
1 1
10
11
12
10
1 1
10
12
13
1 1
12
24
23
26
23
24
23
23
26
23
23
.6
.4
• 3
.0
.5
.2
.6
.9
.4
.9
. 1
-3
.9
.7
.4
.8
.2
.5
.5
.2
. 1
.5
. 1
.8
.3
.2
.3
.0
.2
.9
C-89
-------
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO. YR MAKE MODL
774 74 FIAT 128
CID
79
IHC= 120 PPM HEXANE
ICOCACT] = 2.1
ICO[SPEC]= 1.5
INOX 12
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANC
776 74 TOYO CORO
$CO
%CO
PPM
E
120
IHC= 600 PPM HEXANE
ICO[ACT] = 0.2
ICO[SPEC]= 4.0
INOX = 78
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANC
777 74 TOYO CORO
$CO
%CO
PPM
E
97
IHC= 175 PPM HEXANE
ICO[ACT] = 10.0
ICO[SPEC]= 1.4
INOX = 25
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANC
%CO
%co
PPM
E
TEST TYPE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
GRAMS
HC CO
7.
5.
4.
6.
5.
EFF
7.
2.
3.
5.
4.
4.
3-
3.
4.
3.
EFF
3-
3.
3.
3.
3.
5.
6.
3.
5.
5
00
19
51
05
37
93
98
43
35
12
89
55
75
19
88
95
09
26
50
32
38
05
88
73
32
EFF
3.
3-
2.
3.
3.
95
70
81
82
51
85.
84.
77.
84.
82.
120.
85.
58.
102.
85.
49.
54.
30.
52.
47.
49.
54.
29.
52.
46.
65.
93.
56.
79.
77.
47.
59.
38.
53.
51.
PER MILE
C02 NOXC
0
1
9
5
6
6
2
1
2
1
9
9
7
5
3
4
4
9
0
7
6
1
2
9
4
8
5
4
9
3
279
295
253
287
280
442
459
385
451
435
339
341
321
340
335
349
350
337
349
346
290
287
262
288
281
289
280
258
285
276
.0
.7
.6
.7
.7
.6
.4
.6
.3
.8
.9
.3
.5
.7
.6
.2
.5
.3
.9
.6
.0
.6
.5
.8
.2
.7
.7
.9
.0
.6
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
2
3
2
2
2
1
2
2
2
2
0
2
1
1
3
1
2
2
2
.51
.50
.07
.98
.86
.46
.65
.90
.56
.68
.75
.02
.54
.85
.79
.69
.49
.66
.07
.06
.65
.81
.18
.69
.56
.12
rt C
.75
b
-1
HPG
FUEL
ECOH
20~i
20.0
22.?
20.2
20.8
13-5
14.7
18.2
U.I
15.2
20.5
20.2
23-3
20.3
21.0
20.2
19-9
22.5
A A A
20.0
«A L
20.4
4 f\ n
19. b
21.
_ . r
20.5
01 1
21.1
r
0 4 ^
23-0
27.0
(. \
23-2
C-90
-------
ON
APPENDIX C.CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
N0. YR MAKE MODL
78o 74 VOLV 142
CID
121
IHC= 65 PPM HEXANE
ICOtACT] = 1.7
ICOtSPEC]= 1.5
INOX = 64
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANC
101 73 AMMO HORN
*CO
%CO
PPM
E
232
IHC= 350 PPM HEXANE
ICOtACT] 8.0
ICO[SPEC]= 1.5
INOX 55
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANC
102 73 BUIC ELEC
ICOtACT] !PMQHE
icotspEc]= N;A
^ wux _ c *\
52
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANC
%CO
%CO
PPM
E
455
XANE
*CO
PPM
E
•
TEST TYPE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
H
3-
3-
3-
3-
3.
EFF
3-
3.
2.
3.
3.
4.
3.
3.
3.
3.
EFF
4.
2.
2.
3.
2.
5.
4.
3.
4.
4.
EFF
4.
2.
2.
3.
3-
r
C
83
27
05
54
33
41
08
82
24
08
60
06
15
80
40
35
26
96
26
88
43
1 1
71
74
27
91
86
73"
84
24
JRAMS P
CO
69
76
63
73
71
40
39
38
40
39
53
45
26
49
41
66
30
27
47
36
105
73
67
88
78
96
54
53
74
62
.0
.6
.0
.0
• 3
.0
.9
.6
.0
.6
.0
.3
.6
.0
.8
.7
.0
. 1
.6
.8
.5
.2
.2
.7
.2
.4
.5
• 3
.6
.8
ER MILE
C02
344
344
300
344
332
326
340
292
333
324
432
389
391
410
399
438
438
405
438
429
753
739
636
746
714
717
762
636
741
718
.9
.2
.7
.5
.5
.2
. 1
.6
.5
.3
.5
.5
.9
. 1
.0
.4
.8
.7
.6
.7
.3
.5
.4
. 1
.2
.4
.8
.0
. 1
.9
NOXC
2
1
1
1
1
2
1
2
1
1
7
5
7
6
6
3
2
3
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
2
1
2
1
1
.18
.08
.75
.60
.49
.46
.41
.15
.91
.83
.63
. 10
.70
.31
.33
.66
.01
.63
.80
.79
.16
.10
.99
.61
.56
.29
.40
.29
-83
.83
MPG
FUEL
ECON
19. 1
18.7
21 .7
18 .9
19.5
22.2
21 .5
24.5
21.8
22.4
16.7
18.9
20.0
17 .8
18.7
15.9
18.0
19.4
16.9
17.9
9.5
10.2
1 1 .8
9-9
10.4
10.0
10.4
12.2
10.2
10.7
C-91
-------
APPENDIX C.CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO. YR MAKE MODL CID
103 73 CADI DEVI 472
IHC= 1 10 PPM HEXANE
ICO[ACT] = 2.4 *CO
ICO[SPEC]= 0.5 %CO
INOX - 38 PPM
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANCE
104 73 CHEV VEGA 140
IHC= 320 PPM HEXANE
ICOCACT] = 8.7 %CO
ICO[SPEC]= N/A %CO
INOX = 69 PPM
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANCE
105 73 CHEV MALI 350
IHC= 90 PPM HEXANE
ICOCACT] r 0.8 %CO
ICO[SPEC]= N/A %CQ
INOX = 25 PPM
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANCE
TEST TYPE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
4
2
3
3
3
EF
4
2
3
3
3
7
5
4
6
5
EF
6
5
4
5
5
4
3
3
3
3
EF
4
2
3
3
3
G
HC
.79
.75
.94
.73
.50
F
• 91
.77
.30
.80
.36
.1 1
.78
.73
.42
-77
F
.07
. 10
.57
.56
.15
.74
.18
.38
.93
.56
F
.05
.52
.22
.25
.03
IRAMS
CO
171 .
78.
122.
123.
109.
138.
44.
57.
89.
67.
67.
89.
57-
79.
76.
61 .
73-
51 .
67.
65.
93.
62.
75.
77.
72.
84.
43.
64.
62.
57.
P
8
6
2
2
7
4
6
4
5
4
5
7
3
1
3
4
7
5
8
1
7
5
0
5
3
3
3
7
9
6
ER M:
co;
830
778
703
803
768
815
809
725
812
787
306
359
283
334
327
315
355
286
336
328
517
544
481
531
521
562
590
519
576
565
ILE
2
.8
.0
.4
.3
.5
.9
.2
.5
.4
.8
.8
.5
.5
.3
.9
.7
.7
.4
.5
.5
.2
.7
.0
.6
.7
.6
.0
.2
.9
.0
N
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
2
1
0
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
oxc
.23
• 31
.13
.29
• 31
.80
.88
.15
.81
.02
.80
.85
.91
.31
.31
.61
.79
.83
.20
.25
.50
.05
.67
.26
.31
- Q
.28
n O
.03
4 C
, 1 J
1C
5
H
FO
EC
8
9
9
8
9
8
10
10
9
9
20
1T
22
18
19
20
18
23
19
19
13
4 1
13
4 h
11
. n
13
1 0
13
12
1 *•
13
i J
11
12
13
PG
EL
ON
.0
.8
.8
.8
•3
.5
.0
.?
.2
.a
.\
.1
.8
.5
.0
.6
.2
,2
A
.3
»
,9
.1
i
,0
t
,0
3
J
1
1 1
.5
.3
.1
.9
.3
e-92
-------
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
N0. YR MAKE MODL
106 73 CHEV NOVA
CID
350
IHC= 190 PPM HEXANE
ICO[ACT] = 0.3
ICO[SPEC]= N/A
INOX - 40
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANC
107 73 CHEV IMPA
>co
*co
PPM
E
350
IHC= 250 PPM HEXANE
ICO[ACT] = 0.3
ICO[SPEC]= N/A
INOX 52
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANC
108 73 CHEV IMPA
50 PPM HE
ICO[ACT] - ic;
ico[spEc]= N;A
= 34
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANC
%co
%co
PPM
E
350
XANE
*CO
PPM
E
.
TEST TYPE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
(
HC
4.
2.
3.
3.
3.
EFF
4.
2.
2.
3.
2.
6.
4.
4.
5.
4.
EFF
15-
3-
4.
9.
6.
4.
2.
3-
3-
3-
EFF
4.
3.
3-
3.
3.
97
79
50
83
43
09
29
60
15
74
26
30
68
24
81
78
42
67
34
31
09
70
02
36
07
41
10
74
73
54
3RAMS PER MILE
CO C02
87
78
85
82
82
93
59
56
75
65
106
55
61
79
67
178
54
77
113
86
1 12
72
79
91
82
87
44
* 62
65
58
.6
.5
. 1
.8
.2
.4
. 1
.3
.5
.4
.0
.2
.2
.5
.3
.9
.3
.4
.9
.2
.3
.4
.5
.5
.6
.4
.8
.6
.2
.4
531
571
476
552
537
569
613
523
592
579
563
569
485
566
545
551
614
539
584
581
658
625
567
641
616
612
605
538
608
588
. 1
.3
.0
. 1
.0
.5
.5
.6
.5
.9
.0
. 1
. 1
.2
.0
.7
.7
.0
.6
. 1
. 1
.5
.7
. 1
.5
.3
.7
.8
.9
.8
NOXC
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
1
2
2
3
2
2
0
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
.78
.06
.42
.41
.31
.26
.97
.51
.1 1
.18
.72
.50
.29
.61
.76
.94
.42
.22
.19
.54
.23
.04
.29
.13
.15
.74
.44
.81
.58
.60
MPG
FUEL
ECON
13-0
12.6
14.3
12.8
13- 1
12.2
12.4
14.3
12.3
12.8
11.8
13-3
14.9
12.5
13.3
10. 1
12.5
13-1
11.2
12.0
10.5
11 .9
12.6
1 1 .2
11 .7
11.6
12.9
13.7
12.3
12.8
C-93
-------
APPENDIX C.CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO. YR MAKE MODL C
109 73 CHEV IMPA 4
IHC= 45 PPM HEXA
ID
00
NE
TEST TYPE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
G
HC
5.
2.
2.
02
57
73
RAMS
CO
104.
65.
60.
PE
9
5
4
R MI
C02
640.
683.
587-
LE-
1
6
4
NOXC
1.
1.
2.
67
38
15
HPC
FUEL
ECON
10.8
11.2
12.8
ICOCACT] 1 .8 %CO
ICO[SPEC]= N/A %
INOX - 37 P
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANCE
110 73 DODG DART 2
IHCs 400 PPM HEXA
ICOCACT] = 8.2 %
ICO[SPEC]= 0.5 %
INOX - 52 P
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANCE
111 73 FORD PINT 1
IHC= 230 PPM HEXA
ICOEACT] = 3.0 %
CO
PM
25
NE
CO
CO
PM
22
NE
CO
ICO[SPEC]= N/A %CO
INOX = 60 P
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANCE
PM
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
3-
3-
EFF
4.
2.
2.
3.
2.
5.
4.
4.
4.
4.
EFF
3-
2.
3-
3.
3-
7.
3.
2.
5.
3.
74
12
54
30
64
37
85
51
47
45
97
68
96
66
17
28
07
98
04
79
41
99
EFF
4.
2.
2.
3-
2.
52
42
47
42
86
84.
72.
91 .
43.
58.
66.
57.
108.
104.
102.
106.
104.
78.
32.
63.
54.
50.
109-
76.
60.
92.
78.
72.
46.
31.
59.
47.
4
2
5
7
8
6
7
7
2
2
4
6
9
8
7
9
7
4
5
0
2
8
8
5
1
1
7
662.
648.
660.
688.
598.
675.
658.
351 .
310.
307.
330.
317.
393-
378.
346.
385.
372.
320.
285.
278.
302.
290.
317-
304.
298.
310.
305-
8
4
7
8
2
4
3
6
2
1
0
9
5
0
6
4
6
2
5
7
1
8
7
2
6
6
4
1.
1.
1 .
1.
1.
1.
1.
4.
2.
3-
3.
3-
5.
3-
4.
4.
4.
2.
1 .
2.
1.
1.
2.
1.
2.
2.
2.
52
65
60
35
81
47
53
72
U
81
38
13
79
13
69
56
26
01
53
33
76
85
67
64
1
92
* O
12
4 n
1 7
11.0
11.5
10.8
11.6
12.1
11.2
11.7
16.*
18.2
18.1
17-3
17.5
16.7
20.3
19-1
M ft h
18.1
_ *
19-2
17-2
ft 4 tl
2i,i
-13 1
23-'
,n \
19-'
«A R
20. i
1Q 9
17''
21.1
tj1
ofi.O
CJ'
21-*
22-8
C-94
-------
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
HO. YR MAKE MODL CID
112 73 FORD TORI 351
IHC= 235 PPM HEXANE
ICOUCT] 2.2 *CO
ICO[SPEC]= 0.5 *CO
INOX 46 PPM
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANCE
113 73 FORD MAVE 302
IHC= 300 PPM HEXANE
ICOUCT] = 7.2 %CO
ICO[SPEC]= N/A %CO
INOX _ 35 PPM
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANCE
114 73 FORD CUST 351
JHC= 550 PPM HEXANE
ICOUCT] _ 10.0 ICO
co[SPEC]= M/;;co
INOX = 28 PPM
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANCE
»
TEST TYPE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
t
HC
5-
4.
4.
5.
4.
EFF
5.
3.
4.
4.
3.
9.
4.
5.
7.
5.
EFG
6.
3-
4.
5.
4.
1 1 .
9.
9.
10.
10.
EFF
12.
5.
6.
9.
7.
91
33
84
09
80
03
50
04
23
96
56
91
1 1
14
92
36
93
25
09
52
60
96
08
74
06
83
69
39
1 1
35
3RAMS PER MILE
CO C02
132
94
97
113
103
112
59
74
84
74
102
108
82
105
100
78
65
53
71
64
191
208
175
200
196
255
87
122
167
131
.8
.8
.2
.0
.3
.0
.9
.2
.8
.5
.7
.6
. 1
.8
.2
.5
.7
.0
.8
.9
.4
.4
.7
.3
.0
.0
.5
.4
.7
.5
643
601
528
621
590
729
763
630
747
720
475
463
41 1
468
451
524
543
476
534
521
492
461
427
476
458
503
581
487
543
539
. 1
-5
. 1
.4
.0
.4
.8
.6
• 3
.4
.3
.0
. 1
.9
.4
.7
.3
.4
.4
.2
.6
.9
.6
.6
.9
.0
.4
.8
.9
.7
NOXC
1
0
1
1
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
1
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
2
1
2
1
1
1
2
2
1
2
.19
.87
.04
.02
.98
.42
.41
.54
.42
.45
.23
.65
.16
.93
.91
. 10
.79
.04
.94
.92
.42
.23
.02
.80
.69
.51
.19
.24
.86
.06
MPG
FUEL
ECON
10
1 1
12
10
1 1
9
10
1 1
9
10
13
13
16
13
14
13
13
15
13
13
10
10
12
10
1 1
9
12
12
10
1 1
.2
.6
.7
.9
.6
.6
.2
.7
.9
.4
.3
.7
.0
.5
. 1
.3
.5
.5
.4
.9
.7
.8
. 1
.8
. 1
.4
.0
.7
.6
.5
C-95
-------
APPENDIX C.CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO. YR MAKE MODL
115 73 FORD LTD
CID
400
IHC= 350 PPM HEXANE
ICOCACT] - 5.0
ICO[SPEC]= N/A
INOX = 42
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANC
1 16 73 MERC MONR
56CO
%CQ
PPM
E
400
IHC= 180 PPM HEXANE
ICOCACT] = 3-2
ICOCSPEC]= N/A
INOX - 60
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANC
1 17 73 OLDS 98
%CO
5&CO
PPM
E
455
IHC= 50 PPM HEXANE
ICOCACT] - 0.4
ICO[SPEC]= 0.3
INOX = 90
OTHER TESTS-
AFTER MAINTENANC
%co
%co
PPM
E
TEST TYPE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
GRAMS
HC CO
6.
4.
4.
5-
4.
EFF
4.
3.
3-
3.
3-
6.
4.
4.
5.
4.
EFF
5.
4.
4.
4.
4.
2.
2.
2.
2.
2.
EFF
3.
2.
2.
2.
2.
05
60
29
30
82
58
08
28
79
44
90
24
60
51
89
74
25
18
97
54
73
20
84
45
48
03
68
90
84
81
135-
137.
95.
136.
125.
97.
58.
65.
77.
68.
97.
71 •
75.
83-
77.
97.
51 .
56.
73.
62.
59.
44.
51 •
51 .
49.
51 .
53.
41.
52.
49.
PER MILE
C02 NOXC
9
1
4
5
4
2
4
3
0
3
7
1
7
8
8
5
4
8
5
4
5
1
1
4
2
8
4
8
7
9
634
604
543
618
593
659
667
560
663
636
630
613
548
621
599
605
640
553
623
609
848
854
716
851
815
813
768
683
789
754
.2
.2
.0
.6
.7
.5
.5
.5
.7
.6
.7
.8
.2
.9
.4
.7
.4
.4
.8
.5
.6
.3
.1
.6
.4
.5
.0
.6
.8
.3
3
1
3
2
2
n
2
3
3
3
2
2
1
2
2
2
3
2
2
2
2
1
2
2
1
2
1
2
1
1
• 36
.94
.71
.62
.72
.12
.33
.79
.19
.10
.06
.11
.98
.09
.07
.53
.04
.84
.80
.88
.36
.78
.07
.06
.98
.33
O *7
.37
4 ll
.14
O O
.83
HPG
FUEL
ECON
10 2
w • c.
10.6
12.6
10.il
11.0
10.?
11.5
13.2
11.1
11.8
11.0
12.0
13.0
11.5
12.0
11.1
12.1
13-5
* 0
11.8
12.3
9-3
9r
• 5
nrt
.0
9-'
90
•'
Q «
10.3
| V • *
11-7
i i
10.1
10.5
i "
C-96
-------
ON
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
N0. YR MAKE MODL
118 73 OLDS CUTL
1 I v i ^
CID
350
IHC= 180 PPM HEXANE
ICOtACT] = 3-8
ICO[SPEC]= 0.3
INOX = 62
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANC
119 73 PLYM SATE
%CO
%CO
PPM
E
318
IHC= 230 PPM HEXANE
ICOtACT] = 7.3
ICO[SPEC]= 0.5
INOX - 55
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANC
120 73 PLYM DUST
T tin « A
$CO
%CO
PPM
E
225
JHC= 190 PPM HEXANE
ICOtACT] - o 7 *rn
ICO[SPEC]= o 5
INOX = -,21
OTHER TESTS-
ApTER MAINTENANC
f V V
PPM
E
•
TEST TYPE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
r
HC
13.
3.
4.
8.
5.
EFF
5.
3.
4.
4.
4.
5.
4.
4.
5.
4.
EFF
4.
3-
3.
4.
3.
5.
2.
3.
3.
3-
EFF
5.
2.
2.
3-
3.
39
82
49
40
97
32
54
30
39
12
82
67
46
22
85
79
30
61
01
69
09
69
14
84
30
42
51
97
90
23
JRAMS PER MILE
CO C02
131
54
76
91
76
72
25
51
48
42
129
121
99
125
116
91
47
57
68
59
76
30
43
52
43
94
39
47
65
52
.0
.9
.4
.3
.4
.4
.7
.2
.0
.3
.4
.0
.0
.0
.7
.9
.6
.2
.8
.3
.3
.5
.6
.4
.5
.3
.3
.5
.6
.9
633
666
567
650
632
630
665
564
648
630
542
515
466
528
507
537
565
488
552
539
403
391
367
397
387
410
414
378
412
403
.3
.4
. 1
.5
.5
.6
.7
.3
.9
.8
.4
.0
.0
. 1
.3
.8
.6
.9
.3
.0
.9
.2
.0
• 3
.2
.6
. 1
.9
.4
.8
N
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
2
2
2
2
1
2
1
1
2
1
2
2
2
6
3
5
4
4
4
2
4
3
3
OXC
.34
.45
.57
.40
.46
.23
.88
• 32
.05
.07
.40
.43
.41
.90
.90
.57
.83
.76
.18
.24
.16
.45
.93
.75
.68
.22
.43
.31
.29
.31
MPG
FUEL
ECON
10. 1
11 .6
12.7
10.8
1 1.5
11 .7
12.4
13-5
12.0
12.5
11.6
12.3
14.0
12.0
12.6
12.7
13.6
15.0
13-2
13.8
16.4
19.8
19.9
18.0
19.0
15.4
18.3
19.2
16.8
17.9
C-97
-------
APPENDIX C.CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE
DENVER
PROCEDURE
AND AFTER
RESULTS
MAINTENANCE
VEH
NO. YR
121 73
IHC =
MAKE MODL
CID
PONT CATA 400
200 PPM HEXANE
ICO[ACT] = 3-8
ICO[SPEC]= 0.2
INOX
•
OTHER
AFTER
122 73
IHC =
55
TESTS:
MAINTENANC
PONT LEMA
56CO
*CO
PPM
E
350
175 PPM HEXANE
TEST TYPE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
GRAMS PER MILE
HC CO C02
3.
4.
4.
4.
4.
EFF
6.
6.
5.
6.
6.
4.
4.
4.
87
24
56
07
25
16
77
41
48
27
80
49
54
48
46
29
47
42
50
22
30
36
30
74
62
46
. 1
.6
.9
.3
.4
.6
.6
.0
.0
.4
.8
. 1
.8
725
662
585
692
654
868
749
599
806
732
681
663
564
.1
.0
.7
.2
.2
.0
.0
.8
.0
.8
.8
.8
.3
NOXC
3.70
2.96
6.64
3.31
4.11
6.04
4.69
7.42
5.33
5.71
2.55
1.88
3.54
'H U
FUEL
ECON
10. q
11.9
13.?
1U
12.1
9.2
11.0
13.1
10.1
11.1
10,5
11.1
13.6
ICO[SPEC]=
INOX =
ICO[ACT] = 3.4
0.6 %CQ 72 FTP
95 PPM
75 FTP
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANCE
4.63 68.2 672.4 2.20 11.2
123 73 DATS TRUC 97
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
IHC= 630 PPM HEXANE
ICOtACT] = 0.5 %CO
ICO[SPEC]= 1.5 %CQ 12 FTP
INOX = 70 PPM
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANCE
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
4.
EFF
4.
3-
4.
4.
3.
7.
7.
7-
7.
7-
EFF
7.
7-
7-
7.
7.
56
66
54
26
07
97
54
25
41
39
35
90
39
75
63
59
60.
47.
21 .
26.
33.
28.
57.
47.
46.
52.
49.
67-
56.
55.
61.
58.
6
2
2
5
6
0
0
3
1
0
0
8
0
0
6
2
640
701
679
575
689
655
351
354
305
353
340
344
355
305
350
339
.4
.2
.5
.2
.9
.5
.9
.0
.3
.0
.3
.7
.3
.7
.2
.6
2
2
2
3
2
2
1
0
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
.47
.93
.26
.82
.58
.82
.45
.98
.62
.20
.25
.01
.84
nfl
.U0
f\ O
.92
•^
11.8
11.2
12.3
11.1
11.7
12.5
19-1
4« 7
19.1
TO 1
22.!
19-1
20.1
186
|0>"
19.0
18.8
19-5
C-98
-------
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE
DENVER
PROCEDURE
AND AFTER
RESULTS
MAINTENANCE
VEH
N0. YR MAKE MODL
124 73 OPEL MANT
1 [m • \ •*
CID
116
IHC= 550 PPM HEXANE
ICOtACT] = 10.0
ICO[SPEC]= N/A
INOX - 18
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANC
125 73 TOYO CORO
%CO
%CO
PPM
E
97
IHCs 245 PPM HEXANE
ICO[ACT] = 4.5
ICO[SPEC]= 4.0
INOX = 54
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANC
126 73 VOLK KOMB
%CO
%CO
PPM
E
103
IflCs 4o PPM HEXANE
pOLACT] = 1.7
IHO» EC^ = 3<°
= 60
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANC
%CQ
%CQ
PPM
E
TEST TYPE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
r
HC
7-
6.
5.
7.
6.
EFF
4.
3-
3.
4.
3.
6.
3-
2.
4.
3.
EFF
4.
2.
2.
3.
3.
4.
2.
2.
3.
2.
EFF
4.
1 .
2.
3.
2.
38
83
21
09
50
74
62
42
15
79
05
05
93
49
63
53
67
84
56
10
73
08
20
35
66
34
77
23
00
43
JRAMS PER MILE
CO C02
105
106
82
105
99
82
71
59
76
70
95
63
48
78
65
63
33
32
47
39
70
43
42
56
48
63
28
33
44
36
.2
.1
. 1
.6
.4
.7
.3
.8
.8
.5
.5
.0
.2
.6
.7
.3
.2
.8
.6
.3
.6
.2
.0
.3
.5
.0
.0
.6
.7
.7
278
284
254
281
275
299
317
280
308
303
281
347
281
316
316
289
321
272
306
301
394
484
380
441
437
384
463
352
425
417
.2
.6
.6
.5
. 1
.0
.4
.6
.6
.5
.9
.5
.4
. 1
.0
.7
. 4
.0
.2
.4
.8
.9
.2
.7
.7
.9
.4
.9
.8
. 1
NOXC
1 .
0.
1 .
0.
0.
1 .
0.
1 .
1 .
1 .
1 .
0.
1 .
0.
0.
2.
1 .
2.
1 .
1 .
2.
1 .
2.
1 .
2.
2.
1 .
2.
1 .
1 .
33
68
20
99
96
46
79
36
1 1
08
08
67
35
87
94
17
12
14
63
62
34
62
64
97
05
01
39
10
69
71
MPG
FUEL
ECON
19.0
18.8
22.2
18.9
19.6
20.0
20. 1
23.0
20. 1
20.8
19.7
19.5
24.2
19-6
20.6
22.0
23.2
26.7
22.6
23-8
17.0
15.9
19-6
16.4
17-0
17.8
17.3
21 .5
17.6
18.4
C-99
-------
APPENDIX C.CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
UN INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO. YR
12? 73
IHC =
ICO[A
MAKE MODL CID
VOLK S
190 PPM
CT] -
ICO[SPEC]=
INOX
OTHER
AFTER
375 73
IHCr
ICO[A
TESTS:
EDA 97
HEXANE
6.2 *CO
3.0 %CO
74 PPM
MAINTENANCE
DODG CHAR 318
290 PPM
CT] =
ICO[SPEC]=
INOX
OTHER
AFTER
377 73
IHCr
ICO[A
_
TESTS:
MAINTEN
FORD P
240 PPM
CT] -
ICO[SPEC]=
INOX
OTHER
AFTER
~
TESTS:
HEXANE
6.0 $CO
0.5 %CQ
48 PPM
ANCE
INT 122
HEXANE
9.8 *CO
N/A *CO
52 PPM
MAINTENANCE
TEST TYPE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
GRAMS PER MILE
HC CO C02
5.
4.
3-
4.
4.
EFF
5.
4.
4.
4.
4.
5.
4.
4.
5.
4.
EFF
6.
2.
3-
4.
3.
9.
5.
4.
7.
6.
EFF
7.
4.
4.
5.
5.
37
59
83
96
55
73
30
02
98
52
82
26
04
01
52
69
93
89
73
97
76
48
93
53
21
64
31
45
90
03
70
70
57
70
66
59
62
46
60
57
128
98
81
112
100
128
52
68
88
72
112
99
77
105
96
81
52
53
66
58
.5
.6
.0
.5
.9
. 1
.4
.5
.8
.4
.3
.6
.3
.8
.0
.7
.3
. 1
.9
.3
.5
.6
.1
.8
. 1
.3
.2
.9
. 1
.6
276
283
255
279
274
262
273
240
268
262
495
471
442
483
468
564
563
486
563
542
327
330
309
329
324
300
315
279
308
302
• 3
.3
.6
.9
.3
.3
.5
.4
.2
.2
.5
.7
.3
.1
.6
. 1
.5
.5
.8
.6
.6
.9
.3
.4
.3
.9
.7
.1
.6
.7
NOXC
2.64
1-31
2.19
1.95
1.82
2.?8
1 .24
2.32
1.98
1.85
1.84
1.35
2.28
1.59
1.71
1.44
1.40
1.88
1.42
1.54
1.23
0.9»»
1.40
1.08
1.12
2.47
n ff
1 .87
2 o ^
_ 4 f.
2 .1°
2.26
HPG
FUEL
ECQH
22.0
21.7
— i i |
211.8
21.8
22.5
23.8
23.0
2?. 2
23.1
211.2
12.1
13-9
15.2
13-1
13.9
11.3
13-6
11.7
_ |
12.1
A *
13-3
n£
•"
4 A Q
19-'
nl
-1
4 1 0
17-"
14 I)
17'
23'.$
20-6
21-6
C-100
-------
APPENDIX C.CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
N0. YR MAKE MODL
380 73 FORD THND
CID
460
IHC= 800 PPM HEXANE
ICOUCT] = 10.0
ICO[SPEC]= N/A
INOX = 12
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANC
782 73 AMMO HORN
%CO
%CO
PPM
E
304
IHC= 370 PPM HEXANE
ICO[ACT] = 8.2
ICO[SPEC]= 1.0
INOX - 22
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANC
788 73 CADI DEVI
%CO
%CO
PPM
E
472
JHC = 13QO PPM HEXANE
^OtSPEC]* i'n
INOX a 22
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANC
*UO
%CO
PPM
E
*
TEST TYPE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
(
HC
9.
10.
7.
9.
9.
EFF
5.
3.
5.
4.
4.
1 1 .
8.
7.
10.
8.
EFF
5.
3-
3-
4.
3.
8.
7.
7.
8.
7.
EFF
7.
7.
9.
7.
7.
70
09
97
91
43
27
76
64
48
59
77
43
33
03
82
40
50
71
41
95
63
72
39
15
82
40
18
85
29^
95
3RAMS PER MILE
CO C02
160
194
156
178
177
89
67
98
78
80
163
135
118
148
136
67
27
36
46
38
169
132
106
150
133
137
91
103
113
104
.4
.8
.8
.3
.3
.6
.7
.1
.2
.5
.5
.4
. 1
.9
.5
.5
.3
.7
.5
. 1
.2
.7
.7
. 1
. 1
.0
.6
.6
.3
.2
653.
549.
556.
599.
572.
763.
781 .
657.
772.
743.
546.
580.
524.
564.
558.
522.
562.
507.
543.
539.
693-
630.
625.
660.
642.
732.
701 .
623.
716.
686.
3
6
1
2
7
8
0
1
7
6
2
4
8
0
2
8
6
6
5
4
5
8
0
8
2
5
4
5
3
6
NOXC
1
0
1
1
0
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
3
2
3
3
3
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
.53
.56
. 1 1
.03
.91
.02
.06
.54
.52
.39
.60
.04
• 33
.30
.23
.79
.59
.72
.16
.14
.44
.39
. 1 1
.41
.60
.89
.44
.15
.65
.72
MPG
FUEL
ECON
9.5
10.0
10.7
9.7
10. 1
9.6
9.9
10.7
9.8
10.0
10.6
10.8
12. 1
10.7
11.1
13.7
14.4
15.4
14.1
14.5
9-0
10.3
10.9
9.6
10. 1
9-1
10.2
10.9
9.7
10.1
C-101
-------
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO. YR MAKE MODL CID
790 73 CHEV VEGA 140
IHC=2000 PPM HEXANE
ICO[ACT] - 10.0 %CO
ICO[SPEC]= N/A $CO
INOX - 32 PPM
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANCE
791 73 CHEV VEGA 140
IHC= 100 PPM HEXANE
ICOUCT] = 2.4 $CO
ICO[SPEC]= N/A %CO
INOX - 62 PPM
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANCE
795 73 CHEV NOVA 307
IHC=1450 PPM HEXANE
ICOCACT] = 0.7 56CO
ICO[SPEC]= N/A *CO
INOX = 40 PPM
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANCE
TEST TYPE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
GRAMS PER MILE
HC CO C02 NOXC
10.
13-
7.
11 .
1 1 .
EFF
5.
3.
4.
4.
4.
5.
3-
2.
4.
3-
EFF
4.
2.
2.
3.
3-
10.
7-
8.
9.
8.
06
07
81
63
01
30
88
68
56
39
22
33
91
23
60
32
86
92
56
18
78
37
19
00
29
104
92
74
98
90
83
51
49
67
57
123
93
72
107
93
99
64
53
81
68
101
50
69
74
65
.6
.7
.9
.4
.3
.5
-9
.4
.0
.7
.9
.1
.0
.9
.7
.4
.7
.0
.3
.7
.0
.2
. 1
.5
.8
277
302
267
290
287
300
344
301
323
323
336
296
301
315
306
354
309
310
330
318
456
448
391
452
434
.2
.4
.4
.3
.7
.1
.7
.7
.3
.8
.7
.2
.6
.6
.0
.2
.0
.2
.7
.6
.6
.3
.1
.2
.4
EFF
8.
3-
3.
6.
4.
61
70
98
05
79
133
61
72
95
79
.5
.4
. 1
.9
.2
505
541
469
524
514
.4
.9
.5
.4
.6
1
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
.30
.86
.42
.07
.10
• 37
.08
.72
.22
.31
.47
.03
.73
.24
.31
.61
.29
.81
.45
.50
.95
.72
.02
.83
.85
14
1
/\ C
.05
'nfl
.00
1C
5
MPG
FUEL
ECOH
18
18
21
18
19
19
20
22
20
20
16
19
20
1?
19
16
21
22
f.
18
20
13
. /
16
16
ID
ill
It
15
12
1 *•
ll
12
13
.?
.1
.?
.\
.1
.8
.2
.5
.0
.?
.2
.6
.5
•8
.1
.5
,!
.0
.?
1
,1
0
.7
8
, v
7
. 1
.0
j
5
]s
j
C-102
-------
APPENDIX C.CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
N0- YR MAKE MODL
808 73 CHEV STAW
CID
454
IHC = 1280 PPM HEXANE
ICOtACT] = 1 .8
ICO[SPEC]= N/A
INOX = 45
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANC
809 73 CHRY NEWP
$CO
%co
PPM
E
400
IHC= 340 PPM HEXANE
ICOtACT] 6.8
ICO[SPEC]= 0.5
INOX = 44
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANC
810 73 CHRY NEWY
%co
%co
PPM
E
440
IHC= 330 PPM HEXANE
JCOtACT] , 0.3 %CQ
INOX I °'Q
OTHER TESTS-
AFTER MAINTENANC
$CO
PPM
E
•*
TEST TYPE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
r
HC
19.
13-
12.
16.
14.
EFF
5.
5.
4.
5.
5.
7-
6.
6.
6.
6.
EFF
7.
4.
5.
5.
5.
5-
3.
4.
4.
4.
EFF
4.
2.
2.
3.
2.
20
08
55
01
20
84
93
71
88
58
06
04
48
53
37
25
24
71
68
26
35
87
59
58
37
17
06
55
07
63
JRAMS PER MILE
CO C02
191
145
147
167
155
125
100
100
112
105
118
107
119
1 12
113
122
56
101
87
82
88
33
41
59
46
89
33
37
60
46
.5
.8
.9
.7
.8
.0
.6
. 1
.3
.5
.0
.9
-9
.8
.3
.2
.4
.9
.9
.4
.2
.3
.7
.6
.9
.5
.8
.8
.4
.3
71 1
721
649
716
699
706
709
633
708
688
583
568
497
575
552
583
649
527
617
602
675
707
603
692
672
778
868
715
825
808
.0
.0
.3
.2
.4
.9
.4
.3
.2
. 1
.8
.2
-3
.7
. 1
.4
.5
.3
.9
.6
.6
.7
.5
.3
.7
.2
. 1
.7
. 1
.0
NOXC
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
2
1
1
3
1
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
3
1
3
2
2
2
1
2
1
1
.50
.01
.62
.24
.28
.62
.26
.49
.91
.87
.03
.64
.82
• 31
.25
.87
.23
.99
.54
.57
.19
.84
.68
.49
.62
.20
.58
.35
.87
.92
MPG
FUEL
ECON
8.3
9.0
9.6
8.6
9.0
9.6
10.0
11.0
9.8
10.2
11.2
11 .7
12.6
11 .5
11.8
11.1
11 .8
12.6
11 .5
1 1.9
10.7
11 .5
13-0
11.1
11 .7
9.5
9.6
11.3
9.5
10.0
C-103
-------
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO. YR
811 73
IHC =
MAKE MODL CID
DODG DART 225
260 PPM HEXANE
TEST TYPE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
GRAMS PER MILE
HC CO C02
8.
3.
4.
85
72
18
135
80
92
.2
.6
.6
357
364
320
• 3
.9
.7
NOXC
1
1
1
• 37
.04
.45
ICOUCT] - 5.6 *CO
ICO[S
INOX
OTHER
AFTER
812 73
IHC =
PEC]= 0.5 $CO
24 PPM
TESTS:
MAINTENANCE
DODG DART 318
200 PPM HEXANE
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
6.
4.
EFF
6.
2.
3.
4.
3-
5.
3.
3.
18
90
62
91
69
69
88
15
91
59
106
95
125
52
78
87
74
73
91
58
.7
.1
.5
.3
.7
.3
.6
.5
.7
.8
361
351
377
409
344
394
385
465
462
412
.2
.3
.7
.9
.7
.5
.5
.6
.5
.7
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
.20
.22
.47
.20
.50
.33
.34
.82
.21
.03
HPG
FUEL
ECOH
14.8
17.6
18.5
16.2
17.2
11.9
17.?
18.5
16.2
17.2
11.9
14.3
17.2
ICOUCT] = 5.8 %CQ
ICO[SPEC]= 0.5 %CQ
INOX
OTHER
AFTER
813 73
IHC = 2
ICO[A
ICO[S
INOX
OTHER
AFTER
42 PPM
TESTS:
MAINTENANCE
DODG CHAR 400
000 PPM HEXANE
CT] % 5.2 *CO
PEC]= 0.5 *CO
50 PPM
TESTS:
MAINTENANCE
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
4.
4.
EFF
3.
2.
2.
2.
2.
39.
22.
16.
30.
24.
EFF
46.
21 .
16.
33.
25.
50
08
52
25
68
86
63
00
66
63
48
38
03
88
94
44
50
83
79
53
23
29
37
31
199
146
135
171
154
187
151
135
168
154
.0
.0
.2
.9
.0
.9
-3
. 1
.8
.0
.8
.3
.8
. 1
.0
.7
.3
464
449
487
516
434
502
488
536
592
504
565
557
657
798
603
731
716
.0
.6
.1
.4
.5
.4
.0
.2
.9
.2
.8
.1
.5
.7
.4
.1
.4
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
0
1
0
0
1
0
1
1
1
.50
.56
.75
.25
.02
.49
.57
.26
.66
.32
.95
.96
*\ f
.25
A 0
.9°
/» £
.26
4 1
. 1 1
4 1
. 1 1
11.6
15-1
15-3
A
15-8
18,2
15-5
i t 0
16.3
9-1
90
• J
nc
• 5
n C
9.5
. ft 1
10.1
8.1
u •
8.0
10-2
1 v *
8.1
8.5
C-10A
-------
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO. YR MAKE MODL
Bill 73 DODG DART
U 1 * ' »
CID
318
IHC= 305 PPM HEXANE
ICOtACT] = 8.7
ICOtSPEC]= 0.5
INOX = 45
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANCE
820 73 FORD MAVE
*CO
%CQ
PPM
250
IHC= 230 PPM HEXANE
ICOtACT] = 7.0
ICO[SPEC]= N/A
INOX = 45
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANCE
821 73 FORD MAVE
ICOUCT] =?M8H4X
INOX ~ ,
AKUA - HQ
OTHER TESTS-
AFTER MAINTENANCE
*CO
%CO
PPM
302
ANE
*CO
PPM
.#
TEST TYPE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
r
HC
7.
5.
5.
6.
5.
EFF
5.
3-
4.
4.
4.
5.
3.
4.
4.
4.
EFF
4.
3.
3.
3.
3.
6.
5.
5.
5.
5.
EFF
4.
3.
4.
4.
4.
36
39
09
33
71
57
68
06
58
17
01
78
13
36
12
09
25
73
65
56
41
12
14
74
39
88
93
55
39
30
JRAMS PER MILE
CO C02
123
129
101
126
120
98
50
60
73
63
124
109
97
116
109
86
65
76
75
72
85
97
70
91
87
40
28
30
34
31
.9
.7
.4
.9
.8
.6
. 1
.9
.3
.0
.5
.4
.8
.6
.3
.7
.7
.0
.7
.8
. 1
.5
.9
.6
.7
.3
.5
.7
.1
.5
467.
452.
404.
459.
442.
490.
514.
440.
502.
489.
422.
409.
362.
416.
399.
432.
431.
376.
431.
416.
522.
506.
466.
513.
498.
571.
557.
503-
564.
545.
8
1
5
6
4
2
6
0
9
2
8
9
9
1
7
7
0
7
8
6
4
0
8
9
7
5
3
8
1
6
NOXC
1
0
1
0
0
1
1
1
1
1
2
0
1
1
1
2
1
2
1
1
2
1
2
1
1
2
1
2
2
2
.15
.80
.20
.97
.98
.25
.13
.53
.18
.26
.22
.88
.84
.52
.42
.78
. 1 1
.08
.91
.72
. 1 1
.01
.03
.54
.51
.92
.46
.75
.16
.1 1
MPG
FUEL
ECON
12.9
13-2
15.3
13.1
13-6
13.4
14.7
16.2
14.0
14.8
14.0
14.9
16.8
14.5
15.2
15.3
16.3
17.5
15.8
16.4
13-1
13.1
14.9
13-1
13-6
13-6
14.4
15.7
14. 1
14.6
C-105
-------
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO. YR MAKE MODL CID
822 73 FORD MAVE 250
IHC= 640 PPM HEXANE
ICOCACT] = 4.2 JCO
ICO[SPEC]= N/A $CO
INOX - 59 PPM
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANCE
823 73 FORD MUST 302
IHC=1 120 PPM HEXANE
ICOUCT] = 8.2 *CO
ICO[SPEC]= N/A $CO
INOX = 40 PPM
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANCE
824 73 FORD MAVE 302
IHC= 270 PPM HEXANE
ICO[ACT] = 6.8 *CO
ICO[SPEC]= N/A *CO
INOX - 50 PPM
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANCE
TEST TYPE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
GRAMS PER MI
HC CO C02
3.
3.
2.
3.
3.
EFF
4.
3.
3.
3.
3-
9.
10.
8.
9.
9.
EFF
9.
10.
9.
9.
9.
6.
4.
4.
5.
5.
72
08
97
39
18
89
16
18
99
52
56
27
46
93
63
35
55
01
98
88
61
67
84
60
11
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
51
35
37
M3
39
86
31
41
57
45
25
13
14
19
16
33
09
21
21
17
01
01
81
01
96
. 1
.6
.0
.0
.2
.4
.2
-9
.6
.5
.3
.8
.8
.3
.4
.6
.5
.3
.1
.7
.3
.3
.9
.3
.0
424.
403.
388.
413-
403.
442.
433.
409.
438.
428.
478.
441.
428.
459.
445.
494.
523-
453.
510.
498.
548.
530.
478.
539.
520.
LE
1
8
9
5
9
6
7
4
0
9
2
6
1
1
4
9
9
7
0
8
4
8
4
2
1
NOXC
5
3
4
4
4
1
1
2
1
1
2
1
2
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
1
1
EFF
6.
4.
5.
5.
4.
23
32
23
23
96
79
57
64
68
64
.3
.7
.8
.0
.1
570.
615-
515-
593.
578.
0
1
3
5
6
1
0
1
1
1
.30
.16
.98
.18
.10
.82
.61
.30
.71
.84
.39
.23
.05
.78
.69
.05
.45
.86
.74
.69
.73
.83
.60
.26
.22
ft li
.84
A ll
.94
ll 1
.43
07
.3'
nf.
.20
HPG
FUEL
ECON
17.2
18,9
' /
19.1
18.0
18.?
11.9
18.0
18.3
16.11
17.1
12.6
13-6
11.0
13-1
13-5
12.1
12.2
13.2
12.1
* h
12.1
12.2
.. t
12. &
in 1
11.;
19 4
M>*
o 0
12-J
12.'
\C.'
12.3
1 if • *
11.0
| n
12.«
12-8
0106
-------
APPENDIX C.CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO. YR MAKE MODL CID
826 73 FORD LTD 429
IHC= 200 PPM HEXANE
ICOtACT] - 6.8 *CO
ICO[SPEC]= N/A *CO
INOX = 52 PPM
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANCE
828 73 FORD TORI 351
IHC= 320 PPM HEXANE
ICOtACT] = 6.4 %CQ
ICO[SPEC]= N/A *CO
INOX = 68 PPM
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANCE
831 73 MERC COME 250
_
ICOUCT] =PM7H8XiNE
INOX i. *^u
WUA = 43 PPM
OTHER TESTS-
AFTER MAINTENANCE
*
TEST TYPE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
r
HC
10.
6.
7.
8.
7.
EFF
6.
3.
6.
5.
5.
5.
4.
4.
5.
4.
EFF
6.
3.
4.
5.
4.
4.
3.
4.
4.
4.
EFF
4.
2.
3-
3.
3.
30
46
14
30
44
56
87
92
16
26
30
98
53
14
93
33
93
30
08
53
72
93
74
31
31
65
73
82
64
42
5RAMS PER MILE
CO C02
225
190
167
207
191
122
56
94
87
80
93
113
72
103
98
50
35
36
43
39
114
115
95
114
109
99
71
79
84
79
.6
. 1
.2
. 1
.2
.3
.0
.7
.8
.2
. 1
.7
.8
.8
.3
.8
.8
.7
.0
. 1
.3
.5
.8
.9
.9
.1
.0
.6
.4
. 1
670
671
613
670
655
735
781
650
759
736
627
594
537
610
585
605
608
516
607
582
417
400
357
409
392
466
487
401
477
459
.4
.0
.8
.7
.3
.9
.5
.8
.7
.5
.2
.8
.4
.3
.8
.8
.3
.0
. 1
.6
.9
.7
.7
.0
.5
.7
.8
.2
.7
.8
N
1
0
1
1
1
2
1
2
1
1
2
1
2
1
1
3
1
4
2
2
2
0
2
1
1
2
1
2
1
1
oxc
.78
.89
-99
-32
• 37
.54
-38
.30
.94
.87
.56
.21
.70
.85
.89
.84
.88
.00
.82
.86
.65
.82
.15
.70
.56
.54
.03
.06
.75
.62
MPG
FUEL
ECON
8
9
9
8
9
9
10
10
9
10
1 1
1 1
13
1 1
1 1
12
13
15
12
13
14
14
17
14
15
13
14
16
14
14
.4
.0
.9
.7
. 1
.4
. 1
.8
.7
. 1
.2
.2
.3
.2
.7
.6
. 1
. 1
.8
.5
.5
.9
.0
.7
• 3
.9
.6
.5
.3
.9
0107
-------
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO. YR MAKE MODL
835 73 OLDS CUTL
CID
350
IHC= 210 PPM HEXANE
ICOCACT] - 8.2
ICO[SPEC]= 1.0
INOX = 36
'
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANC
837 73 OLDS CUTL
$CO
%CO
PPM
E
350
IHC= 150 PPM HEXANE
ICO[ACT] = 0.3
ICO[SPEC]= 0.3
INOX = 93
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANC
839 73 PLYM DUST
%CQ
%CO
PPM
E
225
IHC= 235 PPM HEXANE
ICOCACT] = 3.6
ICOtSPEC]= 0.5
INOX = 78
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANC
%CQ
%CO
PPM
E
TEST TYPE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
GRAMS PER MILE
HC CO C02
4.
3-
3-
4.
4.
EFF
3.
2.
3.
2.
2.
5.
1 .
5.
3.
3.
98
97
66
46
09
37
44
35
88
88
92
46
20
59
40
118
106
97
112
106
83
48
72
65
62
68
46
52
56
52
.8
.7
.7
.5
.8
.0
.7
.8
.1
.4
.0
.4
.7
.7
.6
625
639
569
633
617
693
722
613
708
686
582
589
501
586
564
.8
.9
. 1
. 1
.7
.2
.6
. 1
.5
.7
.9
.7
.5
.5
.2
NOXC
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
3
1
3
2
2
• 39
.22
• 38
• 30
• 30
.59
.41
.51
.50
.48
.03
.56
.01
.26
.26
HPG
FUEL
ECON
10.]
10.8
12.1
10.8
11.1
10.6
11.0
12.0
10.8
11.2
12.5
13-3
111.8
12.9
13-5
EFF
5.
3.
4.
4.
4.
5.
3-
4.
4.
3.
71
88
77
76
50
14
30
04
18
88
82
46
57
63
56
104
46
54
74
60
.9
. 1
.2
.7
.7
.2
.5
.4
.1
.5
614
640
543
627
608
378
376
369
377
374
.2
.4
.6
.8
.6
.7
.4
.3
.5
.9
EFF
5.
2.
4.
4.
3.
89
68
30
22
79
97
31
52
63
50
.9
.6
.5
.3
.9
380
401
360
391
386
.2
.9
.6
.5
.2
2
1
2
2
2
3
3
5
3
3
1
2
2
2
2
.56
.51
.57
.01
.02
.71
.22
.02
.46
ft *
.81
- 17
.97
A 4
.31
1C
5
1 0
.33
11.0
12.2
13.1
nn
.9
. .. r
12.5
15-9
. n 1
19-3
4 n fl
19-U
j a C
17.3
18 1
I0.1
16.1
1 V *
19-3
i /
1Q.1
i /
18.6
C-108
-------
ON
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
dENVER
VEH
NO. YR MAKE MODL
840 73 PLYM DUST
CID
318
IHC= 410 PPM HEXANE
ICOUCT] = 9.0
ICO[SPEC]= 0.5
INOX s 34
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANC
842 73 PLYM SATE
*CO
%CO
PPM
E
318
IHC= 175 PPM HEXANE
ICOtACT] = 6.0
ICO[SPEC]= 0.5
INOX = 99
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANC
8I|3 73 PLYM FRY3
T tin ««
*CO
%CO
PPM
E
360
JHC= 220 PPM HEXANE
0 ACT] = 5.8 %CQ
SPEC]= ,.0 %CQ
INOX = 0 PPM
OTUfn m H
uinER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANC
E
TEST TYPE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
r
HC
7.
6.
6.
7.
6.
EFF
6.
3.
4.
4.
4.
8.
6.
7.
7.
7.
EFF
8.
6.
6.
7.
6.
13.
3.
4.
8.
6.
EFF
9.
3.
3.
6.
4.
29
96
01
12
77
47
28
01
81
14
28
82
09
52
19
52
09
85
25
80
58
92
27
54
00
52
61
32
44^
75
JRAMS PER MILE
CO C02
91
121
84
106
104
75
29
42
51
42
206
187
184
196
190
193
140
165
166
158
120
86
70
102
89
98
46
48
71
57
.0
. 1
.5
.7
.9
.7
.5
.6
.6
.6
.4
.3
.0
.4
.3
.6
.7
.3
.0
.3
. 1
.5
.9
.6
.2
.4
.0
.0
.1
.3
454
429
404
441
427
482
531
441
508
496
429
426
375
428
413
436
475
388
456
443
659
608
541
632
600
620
639
539
630
608
. 1
.6
.5
.3
.8
.7
.2
.7
.0
.8
.6
.7
.2
. 1
.3
.7
.0
.6
.7
.5
. 1
.3
.1
.6
.4
.5
.2
.6
.3
.2
i
NOXC
1
0
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
2
4
3
3
4
2
4
3
3
.68
.74
.51
.19
.14
.58
.98
.69
.27
.30
.85
.57
.64
.70
.64
.76
.75
.68
.75
.73
.80
.33
.49
.51
.43
.87
.48
.99
.63
.66
MPG
FUEL
ECON
14.3
13-8
16.0
14. 1
14.5
14.3
15.1
17.0
14.7
15.4
11.4
12.0
12.9
11.7
12.1
1 1.6
12.4
13.2
12.0
12.4
10.0
11.7
13.3
10.8
11.7
11.0
12.3
14.2
11 .6
12.4
C-109
-------
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO. YR MAKE MODL
844 73 PONT VENT
CID
350
IHC= 70 PPM HEXANE
ICO[ACT] = 3-2
ICO[SPEC]= 0.2
INOX 90
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANC
845 73 PONT LEMA
56CO
*CO
PPM
E
350
IHC= 720 PPM HEXANE
ICOCACT] = 9.2
ICO[SPEC]= 0.2
INOX - 39
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANC
846 73 PONT LEMA
*CO
*CO
PPM
E
350
IHC= 440 PPM HEXANE
ICOCACT] = 5.2
ICO[SPEC]= 0.2
INOX _ 26
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANC
*CO
%CO
PPM
E
TEST TYPE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
GRAMS PER MILE
HC CO C02
6.
6.
6.
6.
6.
EFF
5.
5.
5.
5.
5.
7.
6.
5.
7.
6.
EFF
6.
6.
6.
6.
6.
5.
7.
6.
6.
6.
EFF
5.
4.
5.
5.
5.
41
20
53
30
33
44
07
88
25
37
98
16
68
03
40
45
71
10
59
49
26
67
96
52
98
94
75
17
32
11
91
66
57
78
69
69
35
47
51
45
158
80
98
117
101
99
35
50
65
52
71
141
90
107
113
66
41
45
53
47
.8
.7
.6
.7
.4
.2
.0
.6
.4
.5
.2
.6
.5
.8
.5
.1
.2
.0
.8
.4
.4
.2
.8
.8
.1
.4
.4
.6
.4
.7
582
528
484
554
527
630
576
499
602
566
628
615
537
621
596
622
586
511
603
573
614
575
517
594
567
594
604
523
599
580
.8
• 3
.2
.4
.5
.3
• 3
.9
.2
.6
.2
. 1
.7
.3
.7
.4
.6
.8
.7
.5
.9
.3
.6
.3
.7
.8
.3
.1
.8
.2
NOXC
1
1
4
1
2
1
1
3
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
3
3
2
2
4
3
3
3
3
.66
.80
.48
.73
.50
.40
.19
.25
.45
.95
.87
.68
.66
.30
.51
.10
.15
.78
.13
.31
.82
.28
.07
.58
.92
** it
.24
n 0
.08
f\ 1
.92
£ 9
.63
cfi
.5?
MPG
FUEL
ECON
11 o
• i i j
13 (j
• j i v
11.9
12.?
13.5
11.7
13J
15.0
12,7
13-5
9.8
11.1
12.5
10.7
1U
11.1
13-*
i, i
11.6
12.2
. . t
13-'
11.9
.- 0
KM
,1 n
13."
. , 1
11. J
11 f>
1 1."
1? '
it'
13.0
1 J
11.5
12-1
13-2
0110
-------
APPENDIX C ,CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE
DENVER
PROCEDURE
AND AFTER
RESULTS
MAINTENANCE
Jo" YR MAKE MODL CID
849 73 PONT STAW 400
IHC= 225 PPM HEXANE
ICOtACT] = 6.0 *CO
ICO[SPEC]= 0.6 *CO
INOX = 40 PPM
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANCE
850 73 DATS B610 108
IHC= 800 PPM HEXANE
ICOtACT] = 9.0 *CO
ICO[SPEC]= 1 .5 *CO
INOX = 22 PPM
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANCE
851 73 DATS 240Z 146
T UP A
1HC= 85 PPM HEXANE
ICOtACT] = 3.2 %CQ
j?^SPEC]= 2.7 %CO
X - 45 PPM
OTHER TESTS-
AFTER MAINTENANCE
TEST TYPE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
r
HC
6.
4.
4.
5.
4.
EFF
4.
2.
2.
3.
2.
5.
6.
4.
6.
5.
EFF
4.
3.
3.
4.
3.
3.
2.
4.
3.
3.
EFF
3.
2.
6.
3.
3.
07
52
03
26
70
78
32
62
50
91
86
20
92
04
78
59
70
71
12
88
84
99
54
40
59
48
67
27
06
82
JRAMS PER MILE
CO C02
99
82
68
90
82
106
45
56
74
61
66
52
45
59
53
65
38
42
51
44
31
26
33
28
29
35
23
30
29
27
.7
.3
.8
.7
.2
.7
.8
.7
.9
.3
.9
.3
.3
.3
.4
.2
.2
.2
.1
.8
.2
.7
.1
.9
.4
.3
.2
.9
.0
.8
735
702
634
718
690
786
829
701
808
785
308
306
285
307
301
340
359
315
350
343
407
433
338
420
402
418
444
355
431
414
.3
.7
.4
.3
.8
.0
. 1
.7
.5
.5
. 1
.5
.2
.3
.0
.0
.4
.4
. 1
.4
.5
• 3
.0
.9
.0
.2
.2
.9
.8
.7
NOXC
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
-99
.29
.90
.62
.60
.51
.13
.46
.31
.30
.01
.57
.42
.78
.89
.62
.00
.92
-30
.38
.26
.65
.91
.94
.85
.77
.35
.70
.56
.54
MPG
FUEL
ECON
9
10
1 1
10
10
9
9
1 1
9
10
20
21
23
21
22
19
20
22
20
20
18
18
21
18
19
18
18
20
18
18
.7
.5
.7
.1
.6
.2
.8
. 1
.5
.0
.6
.7
.9
.2
.0
.4
.6
.6
.0
.8
.9
.3
-9
.6
.3
.3
.2
.9
.2
.9
C-lll
-------
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO. YR MAKE MODL CID
852 73 BOND CIVI 71
IHCs 270 PPM HEXANE
ICO[ACT] . 4.9 *CO
ICO[SPEC]= 3-0 $CO
INOX - 94 PPM
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANCE
855 73 MG CONV 110
IHC=1050 PPM HEXANE
ICO[ACT] = 2.9 *CO
ICO[SPEC]= 2.5 $CO
INOX = 30 PPM
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANCE
856 73 PORS 914 102
IHC= 430 PPM HEXANE
ICOUCT] = 3.0 %CO
ICO[SPEC]= 3.0 *CO
INOX = 58 PPM
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANCE
TEST TYPE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
G
HC
3-
2.
2.
2.
2.
EFF
3.
2.
2.
2.
2.
3.
2.
2.
3.
2.
EFF
3.
2.
2.
2.
2.
7-
7-
5.
7.
6.
EFF
9,
10.
8.
10.
9.
20
63
17
90
62
06
58
29
81
60
59
51
47
03
72
02
63
56
82
69
57
04
82
29
82
53
58
08
08
68
RAMS PER MILE
CO C02 NOXC
49
49
43
49
47
50
40
38
45
42
64
48
47
56
51
56
58
57
57
58
41
41
37
41
40
44
52
41
48
48
.4
. 1
.5
.3
.7
.0
.7
.5
. 1
.0
.5
.7
.2
.3
.6
.6
.8
.7
.7
.0
.0
. 1
.8
.1
.2
.5
.8
.8
.8
. 1
217
226
203
221
218
240
255
218
248
242
321
358
297
340
334
330
363
302
347
340
384
399
338
392
379
355
345
318
350
340
• 3
.1
.4
.9
.1
.3
.4
.9
. 1
.3
.7
.5
.5
.9
.3
.2
.8
.5
.7
.1
.7
.1
.2
.2
.5
.9
.7
.3
.6
.3
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
1
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
2
1
1
.13
.54
.16
.83
.83
.89
.53
.03
.70
.74
.24
.70
.10
.96
.92
.47
.79
.13
.12
.02
.99
.12
.63
.54
.44
ii f
.45
*} A
.20
nfl
.Oo
rt A
.80
n f\
.70
MPG
FUEL
ECOH
29
28
31
28
29
27
27
31
27
28
20
20
23
20
20
20
19
22
19
20
18
i 0
18
1 1
21
.«
is
in
IS
1Q
19
1 /
19
i /
19
i /
.1
.5
1 j
.8
.8
.5
.0
.1
.0
.1
.0
.*
.0
.11
.2
.9
.T
.1
.1
.
.8
j
.J
o
O
1
, I
5
.2
j
'.]
.9
C-112
-------
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
N0. YR MAKE MODL CID
857 73 TOYO STAW 97
\i j \ • -*
IHC = 1250 PPM HEXANE
ICOtACT] - 10.0 *CO
ICOtSPEC]= 1 .0 %CO
INOX = 14 PPM
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANCE
860 73 SUBA STAW 83
IHC= 380 PPM HEXANE
ICOtACT] = 8.4 %CO
ICO[SPEC]= 3.0 %CO
INOX = 32 PPM
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANCE
863 73 VOLK SEDA 97
TllP \i
1HC= Hio PPM HEXANE
ICOtACT] = 5.6 JCO
ICO[SPEC]= 2 5 *rn
INOX r*
1HUA = 58 PPM
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANCE
TEST TYPE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
n
HC
5.
7.
4.
6.
6.
EFF
3.
3.
2.
3.
3.
7.
4.
3.
5.
4.
EFF
7.
3.
3-
5.
4.
6.
5.
4.
6.
5.
EFF
9.
5.
5.
7.
6.
99
10
65
57
21
97
24
68
59
24
12
31
57
65
68
34
84
65
52
51
75
82
95
27
78
53
82
30
59
44
RAMS PER MILE
CO C02
74
84
58
79
75
55
61
40
59
54
69
65
55
67
63
49
47
46
48
47
76
71
63
74
70
91
67
67
79
72
.3
.5
.6
.6
.3
.9
.9
.9
.0
.9
.3
.0
.0
.1
. 1
.6
.0
.9
• 3
.5
.7
.6
.9
.0
.5
.9
.9
.8
.4
.8
278
267
242
273
263
285
293
258
289
282
265
294
253
280
277
280
314
264
298
294
255
295
252
276
275
273
308
261
291
288
.6
.9
.2
.0
. 1
.2
.7
.7
.7
.4
.8
.6
.9
.8
.5
.9
.6
.7
.5
. 1
.8
.6
.2
.5
.6
.6
.4
.8
.7
.5
NOXC
2
1
2
2
1
1
0
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
.87
.20
.29
.00
.84
.93
.71
.62
.29
.21
.85
.65
.91
.75
.76
.04
.71
.98
.87
.85
.23
.65
.35
.93
.96
.85
.61
.06
.72
.78
MPG
FUEL
ECON
21 .
21 .
25.
21 .
22.
23-
22.
26.
22.
23-
22.
21 .
25.
22.
22.
23-
22.
25.
22.
23-
22.
20.
24.
21 .
21 .
19-
20.
23-
20.
21.
4
0
4
2
1
0
1
8
5
4
3
6
2
0
7
2
2
4
7
2
3
8
1
5
9
8
5
0
1
0
0113
-------
APPENDIX C.CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO. YR MAKE MODL
864 73 VOLV 1
IHC= 760 PPM
ICOCACT] =
ICO[SPEC]=
INOX a
OTHER TESTS:
42S
CID
121
HEXANE
7.8
2.0
48
%CO
%CO
PPM
TEST TYPE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
GRAMS
HC CO
7.
9.
7.
8.
8.
46
99
25
78
72
83.
1 10.
97.
97.
101 .
PER MILE
C02 NOXC
9
6
0
9
4
309
283
260
296
282
.9
.5
. 1
. 1
.5
2.114
0.95
1.17
1.66
1.40
HPG
FUEL
ECOS
"""**».
19 1
y * I
18.1
20.1
18.6
18.?
SC/3M MICE EFF
AFTER MAINTENANCE
076 72 -AMMO G
IHC=2000 PPM
ICOtACT]
ICO[SPEC]=
INOX
OTHER TESTS:
REM
258
HEXANE
7.8
1 .5
40
56CO
*CO
PPM
AFTER MAINTENANCE
077 72 BUIC RIVI
IHC= 160 PPM
ICOCACT] =
ICO[SPEC]=
INOX =
OTHER TESTSr
AFTER MAINTEN
455
HEXANE
4.7
N/A
33
ANCE
$CO
56CO
PPM
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
LO/HI SC/3M
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 pxp
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
LO/HI SC/3M
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
6.
5.
4.
6.
5.
33.
32.
29.
32.
31.
62
81
89
20
73
23
14
63
66
68
MTCE
2.
2.
2.
2.
2.
8.
5.
4.
7-
5.
40
67
43
54
55
78
38
46
01
83
MTCE
6.
4.
3.
5.
4.
67
21
92
39
64
86.
86.
72.
86.
83.
100.
111 .
95-
106.
104.
EFF
57.
49.
39.
53.
48.
119.
99.
60.
109-
92.
EFF
84.
46.
37.
64.
52.
8
8
8
8
0
0
7
4
1
8
5
6
8
4
5
8
2
5
0
9
8
7
7
9
1
314
307
274
310
299
341
300
300
319
308
349
405
340
378
376
683
643
588
662
636
698
680
617
689
667
.4
.5
.5
.8
.9
• 3
.1
.1
.8
.6
.2
.1
.5
.4
.0
.1
.3
.7
.3
.6
.3
.7
.8
.2
.2
2.32
1.17
1.78
1.72
1.57
2.52
0.99
2.20
1.72
1.63
1.50
1.60
2.24
1.55
1.76
7.05
3.99
ft 4
7.81
t f
5. "6
f f.
5.66
f fj ft
6.77
„ (.(,
4.00
_ li n
7.42
c 67
5.01
c A«i
5. op
18,5
19.2
21.}
19.8
19,8
1U
15.1
16.3
15.0
15.5
A
19-8
18. f
- j £
21-5
. Q A
18.5
. . •)
19-5
9-5
4 fl 0
1(M
1? 1
K.I
m (
|U.'
n I
1 1 >
10-'
1 y
11.1
12-5
| fr
11-'
11-1
C-114
-------
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE
DENVER
PROCEDURE
AND AFTER
RESULTS
MAINTENANCE
VEH
HO. YR MAKE MODL
0?8 72 CADI DEVI
CID
472
IHC= 190 PPM HEXANE
ICOtACT] - 5.5
ICO[SPEC]= N/A
INOX = 25
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANC
079 72 CHEV VEGA
*CO
%CO
PPM
E
140
IHC= 80 PPM HEXANE
ICOtACT] = 1 .5
ICO[SPEC]= N/A
INOX = 25
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANC
080 72 CHEV MALI
_
•* n v * t T ^ p o iui u c*
^ • •> ^i fi PI
ICO[SPEC]= N}A
•L NO X •» c c
DO
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANC
*CO
%CO
PPM
E
350
XANE
*CO
PPM
E
-*
TEST TYPE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
LO/HI SC/3M
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
LO/HI SC/3M
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
LO/HI SC/3M
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
i
HC
4.
4.
3.
4.
4.
MT
6.
3.
5.
5.
4.
6.
3.
4.
4.
4.
90
04
71
45
13
CE
71
70
16
14
72
77
18
45
90
27
MTCE
7.
5.
4.
6.
5.
5.
4.
4.
4.
76
46
04
56
55
04
84
18
94
4.70
MTCE
5.68
3.
2.
4.
3.
10
91
34
58
}RAMS PER MILE
CO C02
161
129
97
144
127
EFF
227
137
189
180
170
95
53
67
73
66
EFF
100
74
66
87
77
77
109
68
94
91
EFF
83
54
50
68
59
.4
.8
.8
.9
.5
.3
.5
.2
.5
. 1
.2
.5
.7
.4
.0
.5
.5
.9
.0
.8
.0
.6
.7
.0
.8
.7
.3
.2
.4
.2
742
707
666
724
703
826
805
705
815
782
348
447
311
399
389
363
413
331
389
381
481
430
423
454
438
568
583
501
576
557
.7
.0
.4
. 1
.3
.2
.3
.4
.3
-3
.4
.0
.9
.8
.8
.0
.9
.8
.5
.0
-7
.0
.2
.7
.8
.9
.0
.5
.3
.9
NOXC
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
1
1
0
1
0
0
3
1
3
2
2
2
1
2
1
1
.88
.14
.07
.49
.55
.52
.29
.45
.40
.38
.57
.96
.53
.26
.25
.07
.64
.18
.85
.88
.95
-39
.91
.62
.61
.41
.45
.50
.91
.93
MPG
FUEL
ECON
8.8
9.6
10.7
9.2
9.7
7.4
8.6
8.7
8.0
8.3
17.1
16.4
20.5
16.7
17.5
16.3
16.2
19.7
16.2
17.0
14.3
14.4
16.3
14.4
14.8
12.4
13-1
15.1
12.7
13.4
C-115
-------
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO. YR
081 72
IHC =
ICO[A
icots
INOX
OTHER
AFTER
082 72
IHCs
ICOCA
MAKE MODL
CHEV CHEL
CID
350
90 PPM HEXANE
CT] = 1.6
PEC]= N/A
57
TESTS:
MAINTENANC
CHEV NOVA
$CO
$CO
PPM
E
307
780 PPM HEXANE
CT] - 10.0
ICO[SPEC]= N/A
INOX
OTHER
AFTER
083 72
IHC =
15
TESTS:
MAINTENANC
CHEV IMPA
%CQ
%CO
PPM
E
350
550 PPM HEXANE
TEST TYPE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
LO/HI SC/3M
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
LO/HI SC/3M
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
HC
4.20
3.30
3-40
3-73
3.51
MTCE
4.22
2.91
3.35
3.54
3.30
8.12
8.01
6.90
8.06
7.73
MTCE
5.65
3.87
4.32
4.72
4.36
7.76
5.80
6.16
(RAMS P
CO
68
59
50
63
58
EFF
71
41
41
55
47
83
83
66
83
79
EFF
73
30
47
51
44
116
97
94
.2
.4
.2
.6
.7
-3
.6
.7
.8
.7
.7
.7
.9
.7
. 1
.4
.9
.3
.3
.1
.7
.4
.0
ER MILE
C02 NOXC
521
532
469
527
513
559
582
487
571
551
510
474
455
491
476
582
569
506
575
554
555
585
528
.0
.9
.6
.2
.2
.4
.2
.7
.3
.7
.7
.6
. 1
.9
.7
.5
.1
.9
.5
.9
.1
.0
.8
2.
1.
2.
1.
1.
2.
1.
2.
1.
1.
3-
2.
3-
2.
2.
3-
2.
3-
3-
3-
2.
1.
2.
22
19
01
69
63
32
41
22
84
82
14
16
49
63
73
68
55
79
09
12
39
62
89
ICO[ACT] - 6.5 *CO
ICO[SPEC]= N/A
INOX
OTHER
AFTER
55
TESTS:
MAINTENANC
$CO
PPM
E
72 FTP
75 FTP
LO/HI SC/3M
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
6.74
6.30
MTCE
8.19
5.02
5.41
6.54
5.78
106
100
EFF
104
63
72
83
74
.7
.5
.7
.9
.6
.4
.7
570
563
582
645
547
615
605
.7
.5
.1
.3
.2
.0
.5
1.
2.
2.
1 .
3-
2.
2.
99
13
f i
67
nft
9°
4 T
17
34
1
n c
4!)
HPG
FUEL
ECON
13.8
15.9
13.9
1U
13.0
13.5
15.?
13.2
13.9
13-3
11.1
15.2
13-1
14.2
12.-
U.I
U.J
. f. A
13-2
_ A
13-9
4 t 1
11.1
«0 R
12.0
. . 7
11.'
o fl
12."
11.5
1 I * '
11.'
13-'
* «/
12.0
C-116
-------
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
Jf YR MAKE MODL CID
084 72 CHEV BELA 400
\J V • 1
IHC = 1150 PPM HEXANE
ICOUCT] ^ 6.2 *CO
ICO[SPEC]= N/A %CO
INOX - 45 PPM
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANCE
085 72 DODG CORO 318
IHC= 225 PPM HEXANE
ICOCACT] = 2.2 *CO
ICO[SPEC]= 0.5 %CO
INOX = 67 PPM
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANCE
086 72 FORD PINT 122
JHCs 850 PPM HEXANE
ICOUCT] = 9.0 *CO
ICOI3MCJ. 12,'°°
u* = 42 PPM
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANCE
TEST TYPE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
LO/HI SC/3M
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
LO/HI SC/3M
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
LO/HI SC/3M
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
9
6
5
7
7
HC
.24
.79
.71
.96
.00
MTCE
6
2
3
4
3
4
3
4
4
3
.57
.79
.45
.60
.75
.89
.52
.06
.17
.95
MTCE
5
3
3
4
4
5
5
4
5
.81
.66
.94
.69
.18
.62
.91
.03
.77
5.34
MTCE
4.06
2
2
3
2
.41
.19
.20
.69
3RAMS PER MILE
CO C02
134
78
74
105
89
EFF
117
44
60
79
63
58
28
46
43
39
EFF
82
46
47
63
53
86
73
60
80
72
EFF
71
41
37
56
46
.3
.9
.2
.4
.0
.6
.7
.0
.6
.9
.9
.5
.8
.0
.7
.0
. 1
.4
-3
.9
.7
.9
. 1
.0
.8
.7
.5
.5
.0
.6
578.
589.
530.
584.
571 .
580.
690.
577.
637.
636.
501 .
508.
463.
505.
494.
506.
505.
459.
505.
493-
295.
295.
270.
295.
288.
314.
346.
291 .
331.
324.
8
6
1
4
1
2
3
3
6
8
5
9
0
3
8
1
5
8
8
2
3
7
5
5
8
4
3
3
0
7
NOXC
4
2
4
3
3
3
2
4
3
3
4
3
4
3
3
3
3
4
3
3
4
3
4
3
3
2
1
2
1
1
.25
.67
.94
.43
.61
.85
.84
.76
• 32
.57
. 10
.19
.51
.63
.74
.62
.06
.14
.33
.47
.31
.23
.69
.75
.85
.19
.26
.46
.70
.78
MPG
FUEL
ECON
10.
12.
13.
11 .
12.
1 1 .
11 .
13.
11 .
1 1 .
14.
15.
16.
15.
15.
13.
15.
16.
14.
15.
19.
20.
23.
20.
21 .
20.
21 .
24.
20.
21 .
8
1
4
4
1
3
5
0
4
8
6
7
2
1
6
6
1
2
3
0
8
6
5
2
1
2
2
9
7
8
C-117
-------
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO. YR MAKE MODL CID
087 72 FORD GRNT 351
IHC= 140 PPM HEXANE
ICO[ACT] = 4.0 JCO
ICO[SPEC]= N/A $CO
INOX = 80 PPM
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANCE
088 72 FORD MAVE 200
IHC= 250 PPM HEXANE
ICOCACT] = 3-5 JCO
ICO[SPEC]= N/A %CO
INOX = 78 PPM
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANCE
089 72 FORD GALA 351
IHC= 150 PPM HEXANE
ICOCACT] = 3.5 *CO
ICO[SPEC]= 0.1 *CO
INOX = 103 PPM
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANCE
••
TEST TYPE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
LO/HI SC/3M
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
LO/HI SC/3M
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
LO/HI SC/3M
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
GRAMS PER MI
HC CO C02
6
4
4
4
4
.04
.00
.25
.97
.48
MTCE
7
3
4
5
4
4
3
3
4
3
.59
.51
.00
.47
.49
.95
.59
.60
.24
.87
MTCE
5
3
3
4
3
5
3
6
4
5
.08
.01
.28
.00
.51
.85
.77
.77
.77
.02
MTCE
4
3
4
3
3
.03
.22
.93
.61
.85
102
64
49
82
68
EFF
118
29
37
72
50
81
57
36
68
56
EFF
85
40
34
62
48
67
72
48
70
64
EFF
70
74
60
72
70
.0
.9
.5
.7
.4
.0
.8
.3
.1
.0
.2
• 3
.5
.7
.5
.2
.8
.3
.1
.2
.4
.4
.7
.0
.9
.4
.7
.6
.6
.0
599.
611.
530.
605.
586.
582.
613.
526.
598.
583.
377.
362.
352.
370.
363.
383.
381 .
352.
382.
373.
645.
656.
566.
651 •
629.
705.
715.
605-
710.
683-
LE
NOXC
1|
3
9
6
9
4
8
1
8
4
7
9
1
0
0
6
0
9
2
9
7
7
5
4
8
9
3
6
8
4
3
3
3
3
3
2
3
2
2
5
2
5
3
3
5
3
6
4
4
4
1
4
2
2
3
1
2
2
2
• 91
.06
.53
.47
.64
.00
.48
.52
.73
.87
.14
.12
.47
.56
.65
.62
.10
.55
.31
.56
.09
.90
.25
.95
.99
n Q
.Oo
li rj
.47
Q A
.89
1A
. 9
MPG
FUEL
ECOH
11.
12.
11.
11.
12.
11.
13.
14.
12.
13-
17.
19-
21.
18.
19-
16.
19-
21-
. ft
18.
19-
11.
4 *
11.
13-
4 4
11.
4 1
1 '•
10-
1 "
10-
| V
12-
1 «*
llt
4
I
3
8
5
2
2
9
2
1
0
I
1
1
1
i
5
3
«
3
5
i
3
1
1
.
7
5
«
(j
o
0118
-------
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO. YR MAKE MODL CID
OQO 72 FORD STAW 400
\J J V 1
IHC= 275 PPM HEXANE
ICOUCT] = 5.0 %CQ
ICO[SPEC]= N/A *CO
INOX - 55 PPM
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANCE
091 72 MERC MONO 400
IHC= 120 PPM HEXANE
ICO[ACT] = 1.3 %CO
ICO[SPECJ= 0.1 *CO
INOX _ 68 PPM
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANCE
°92 72 OLDS CUTL 350
T U O
iHCs 325 PPM HEXANE
ICO[ACT] = 8.8 *CO
iSoiSPEC]= N/A *co
INOX = 30 PPM
OTHER TESTS-
AFTER MAINTENANCE
•
TEST TYPE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
LO/HI SC/3M
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
LO/HI SC/3M
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
LO/HI SC/3M
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
5
3
5
4
4
HC
.46
.92
.08
.66
.56
MTCE
4
2
3
3
3
4
2
3
3
3
.22
.52
.87
.33
.24
.93
.79
.91
.82
.54
MTCE
5
1
3
3
3
8
4
5
6
.76
.86
.18
.73
.02
.78
.97
.82
.79
5.99
MTCE
5.16
2
3
3
3
.75
.74
.90
.52
3RAMS PER MILE
CO C02
98.
69.
65.
83.
74.
EFF
85.
34.
50.
59.
49.
68.
18.
32.
42.
32.
EFF
74.
13.
36.
42.
32.
141.
149.
97.
145.
133.
EFF
75.
51 .
60.
63.
58.
3
8
7
4
6
8
8
3
2
5
0
6
5
3
6
2
1
5
4
1
4
9
7
8
9
7
2
2
0
7
653
583
540
616
586
684
692
599
688
665
644
672
595
658
645
734
795
670
766
748
505
446
425
474
452
558
583
481
571
550
.3
.4
.4
.8
. 1
.3
.3
.4
.5
.3
.0
.6
.1
.9
.6
.4
.2
.6
.1
.7
.7
.0
.8
.6
.8
.2
.4
.4
-3
.3
NOXC
5
3
5
4
4
4
3
5
3
3
5
3
6
4
4
4
3
5
3
3
1
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
.40
.78
.85
.56
.68
.16
.25
.05
.69
.93
.26
.38
.1 1
.28
.51
.79
.05
.16
.88
.99
.89
.80
.68
.32
.26
.88
.05
.73
.45
.41
MPG
FUEL
ECON
10
12
13
1 1
12
10
1 1
12
1 1
11
11
12
13
12
12
10
10
12
10
1 1
1 1
12
14
12
13
12
13
15
13
13
.8
.6
.5
.6
.4
.7
.8
.8
.2
.8
.6
.5
.5
.0
.5
.2
.8
.0
.5
.0
.7
.7
.8
.2
.0
.8
.2
.1
.0
.6
C-119
-------
APPENDIX C.CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO. YR MAKE MODL
093 72 PLYM VALI
CID
225
IHC= 900 PPM HEXANE
ICO[ACT] = 10.0
ICO[SPEC]= 0.5
INOX = 1 1
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANC
094 72 PLYM FURY
$CO
%CQ
PPM
E
360
IHC= 245 PPM HEXANE
ICOUCT] = 8.5
ICO[SPEC]= 0.5
INOX = 41
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANC
095 72 PONT CATA
%CO
JCO
PPM
E
400
IHC= 625 PPM HEXANE
ICOCACT] = 4.8
ICO[SPEC]= N/A
INOX = 60
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANC
56CO
JCO
PPM
E
TEST TYPE
COLD TRANS 1
COLD STAB 1
HOT TRANS
72 FTP 1
75 FTP 1
LO/HI SC/3M
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS 1
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP 1
75 FTP
LO/HI SC/3M
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
LO/HI SC/3M
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
r
HC
6
4
9
5
3
.27
.10
.71
.14
.35
MTCE
6
3
4
4
4
1
9
7
0
9
.85
.29
.33
.99
.30
.82
.89
.37
.82
.60
MTCE
7
3
3
5
4
8
5
5
7
6
.14
.42
.99
.20
• 34
.89
.88
.41
.32
.38
MTCE
7
4
5
6
5
.79
.85
.13
.26
.53
IRAMS PER MILE
CO C02
195
196
140
196
181
EFF
126
57
77
90
77
217
224
164
220
206
EFF
119
33
56
74
57
153
92
68
121
98
EFF
123
44
50
82
62
.9
.5
.0
.2
.0
.2
.2
.8
.2
.0
.2
.0
.4
.8
.4
.8
.3
.6
.7
.4
.7
.4
.6
.7
.5
.6
.8
.2
.5
.5
302
260
277
280
273
356
384
343
370
367
510
460
442
484
465
552
601
511
577
566
589
598
532
594
578
625
655
563
640
624
.9
.5
.8
.8
.9
. 1
.5
.1
.9
.3
.8
.0
.8
.3
.8
.0
.7
.0
.9
.8
.0
.7
.9
.1
.8
.1
.1
.9
.7
.1
NOXC
1
0
2
1
1
2
1
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
3
2
3
2
2
3
2
2
2
2
3
2
2
• 72
.96
• 36
• 32
.50
.66
.96
.98
.30
.39
.88
.04
.85
.45
.44
.98
.77
.57
.87
.03
.77
.48
.85
.62
.91
.75
_ 4
.51
.97
f O
.63
f\ K
*1 U
HPG
FUEL
ECON
"n
I'M
16.8
13.9
111.8
15.1
18.3
18.5
16.8
17.T
10.0
10.5
12.3
10.3
10.8
t
11.6
13-3
11.5
12.5
13-2
10.3
. , t
11.'
nc
-'
,, A
11-"
41 fl
ll.o
10 5
|U>'
12. 0
|t'
n.5
i }•'
12-0
C-120
-------
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
HO. YB
096 72
IHC =
MAKE
PONT
MODL CID
LEMA 350
220 PPM HEXANE
ICOtACT] -
ICO[SPEC] =
INOX
OTHER
AFTER
097 72
IHC =
r
TESTS
4.0 %CO
N/A *CO
72 PPM
•
•
MAINTENANCE
DATS
510 97
480 PPM HEXANE
ICOtACT] =
ICO[SPEC]=
INOX
OTHER
AFTER
098 72
ICO[A
icots
ox
OTHER
=
TESTS
8. 1 *CO
2.0 *CO
65 PPM
•
•
MAINTENANCE
TOYO
CT J r
PEC ] =
—
CORO 120
M HEXANE
3^0 *CO
80 PPM
TESTS:
MAINTENANCE
TEST TYPE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
LO/HI SC/3M
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
LO/HI SC/3M
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
LO/HI SC/3M
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
HC
5.50
4.78
4.30
5.13
4.80
MTCE
5.45
3.48
4.43
4.42
4.14
4.69
4.89
3-67
4.79
4.52
MTCE
5.19
4.48
4.06
4.82
4.51
4.09
3.70
3.78
3.88
3.80
MTCE
3.76
3.75
4.16
3.76
3.86
3RAMS PER MILE
CO C02
94
93
71
93
87
EFF
92
38
58
64
55
48
35
28
42
36
EFF
52
39
35
45
41
40
51
31
46
43
EFF
32
49
27
41
40
.5
.2
.9
.8
.7
.5
.7
. 1
.5
. 1
.9
.8
.7
. 1
.5
.4
.5
.8
.7
.2
.5
.6
. 1
.3
.7
. 1
.8
.4
.3
.0
568
557
508
562
546
576
628
515
603
586
320
300
273
310
297
308
299
266
303
292
315
309
285
312
304
301
282
272
291
283
.6
.0
.3
.5
. 1
. 1
.3
.8
.3
.9
.9
.9
.0
.5
.4
.3
.3
. 1
.6
.1
.4
.7
.3
.5
.2
.4
.7
.7
.6
.8
NOXC
2
1
1
1
1
2
1
2
1
1
2
1
2
2
2
2
1
2
1
1
3
2
3
2
2
3
2
4
2
2
.23
.24
• 96
.71
.64
.29
.50
.33
.88
.89
.54
.74
.62
.12
.15
. 12
.55
.25
.82
.85
.74
.02
.89
.84
.89
.89
.02
.02
.91
.95
MPG
FUEL
ECON
12. 1
12.3
14.0
12.2
12.7
12.0
12.7
14.3
12.4
12.9
21 .5
23.8
26.9
22.7
24.0
21 .8
23-6
26.5
22.7
23.9
22.6
22.0
25.6
22.3
23- 1
24.4
23.8
27.0
24.1
24.7
C-121
-------
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO.
099
I
GRAMS PER MILE
YR
72
HC =
MAKE
VOLK
300 P
MODL C
KARM
PM HEXA
ID
97
NE
TEST
COLD
COLD
HOT
TYPE
TRANS
STAB
TRANS
HC
4.76
3-65
3.26
CO
56.8
45.6
44.7
C02
262.7
284.2
243.5
NOXC
2.13
1.17
1.74
HPG
FUEL
scon
21.2
21.2
27.1
ICO[ACT] - 4.6 %CO
ICO[SPEC]= N/A *CO 72 FTP
INOX = 67 PPM
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANCE
100 72 VOLK KOMB 103
75 FTP
LO/HI SC/3M
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
IHC=1520 PPM HEXANE
ICOtACT] - 9.7 %CO
ICO[SPEC]= 3.0 *CO 72 FTP
INOX - 32 PPM
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANCE
396 72 CHEV KING 350
75 FTP
LO/HI SC/3M
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
IHC= 230 PPM HEXANE
ICOtACT] = 7.2 *CO
ICO[SPEC]= N/A *CO 72 FTP
INOX . 36 PPM
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANCE
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
4.18 51.0 273-9 1.63 2!|.2
3
.77
MTCE
5
4
3
4
4
6
5
4
5
5
.22
.10
.86
.64
.26
.45
.06
.63
.73
.23
MTCE
8
6
5
7
6
7
5
5
6
6
EF
7
4
5
5
5
.01
.45
.30
.20
.46
.59
.64
.64
.58
.04
F
.09
.32
.15
.64
.11
47
EFF
55
56
54
56
55
59
58
52
58
56
EFF
48
39
37
43
40
132
105
93
118
107
91
42
66
66
59
.7
.2
.9
.0
. 1
.8
.1
.3
.2
.6
.8
.9
.4
. 1
.9
.7
.4
.4
.5
.3
.7
. 1
.9
.8
.0
.3
268
261
281
240
271
266
381
433
355
408
401
373
412
345
394
386
586
591
538
588
575
618
659
558
640
623
.7
.9
.2
.4
• 9
. 1
.5
.8
. 1
.7
.5
.6
.7
.7
.0
.4
. 1
.0
.7
.7
.7
.9
.6
.5
.1
.6
1
1
0
1
1
1
2
1
2
1
1
2
1
2
2
2
3
2
4
3
3
3
2
4
3
3
.52
.97
.91
.45
.42
.27
.29
.46
.12
.86
.81
.54
.58
.46
.04
.02
.86
.51
.39
.15
.30
— ti
.94
.54
.03
24
1
/K >5
.23
25.0
21.3
23.1
26.3
23-?
21.2
17. §
16.1
19.6
17.!
17.5
18.?
17-5
21.1
t 6 1
18. j
,o o
1o.o
10.8
n i
1 I-'
,, i
12. »
11.2
11.«
11 3
1 1 . j
12.1
13.'
11-f
12.'
i *•
0-122
-------
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO. YR MAKE MODL
398 72 CHRY NEWP
jjv '
CID
400
IHC= 220 PPM HEXANE
ICOUCT] = 4.5
ICO[SPEC]= 0.5
INOX 55
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANCE
100 72 DODG DART
%CO
%CO
PPM
318
IHC= 420 PPM HEXANE
ICOUCT] = 8.4
ICO[SPEC]= 0.5
INOX = 30
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANCE
*01 72 FORD PINT
ICOUCT] !PM3Hirx
JCOtSPEC]- N/A
INOX = 26
OTHER TESTS-
AFTER MAINTENANCE
*CO
%CO
PPM
122
ANE
PPM
TEST TYPE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
t
HC
8.
5.
5.
6.
5.
EFF
8.
3.
4.
6.
5.
12.
6.
6.
9.
7.
EFF
16.
1 1 .
21.
14.
15.
10.
7.
6.
8.
7.
EFF
10.
7-
6.
8.
7.
41
07
17
67
79
94
95
96
34
25
70
31
34
37
64
65
85
92
15
59
10
62
27
81
76
24
33
33
72
66
3RAMS PER MILE
CO C02
123
82
75
102
89
123
33
63
76
60
141
106
84
123
107
137
37
57
85
63
108
61
61
83
71
120
58
61
88
72
.9
.5
.0
.3
.0
.5
.2
.5
.4
.0
.4
.2
.9
.0
.6
.7
.4
.8
.4
.6
.0
.6
.0
.8
.0
. 1
.8
.5
.1
.2
582
605
559
594
588
615
646
570
631
619
402
397
376
399
392
465
499
413
482
468
350
333
310
341
330
336
321
304
328
319
.2
.9
.8
.5
.4
. 1
.6
.4
.5
.3
.0
.0
.3
.4
.4
.0
.0
.3
.8
.6
.6
.5
.8
.7
.8
.0
.1
.4
.2
.6
NOXC
4
2
5
3
3
4
2
4
3
3
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
2
1
2
2
2
2
2
3
2
2
.34
.74
.19
.51
.74
.14
.82
.78
.45
.63
.98
.23
.21
.59
.65
.91
-39
.08
.64
.68
• 39
.74
.79
.05
.16
.69
.48
.32
.58
.75
MPG
FUEL
ECON
11 .0
11 .8
12.8
11 .4
11 .9
10.6
12.5
12.9
11.5
12.2
13.4
15.2
16.8
14.3
15.2
12. 1
14.9
15.5
13-4
14.4
16. 1
19.5
20.8
17-7
19.0
15.9
20.3
21 . 1
18.0
19.4
C-123
-------
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO. YR MAKE MODL CID
404 72 FORD LTD 429
IHC= 430 PPM
ICOtACT]
ICOtSPEC]=
INOX
'
OTHER TESTS:
HEXANE
9.4 %CO
N/A JCO
27 PPM
AFTER MAINTENANCE
410 72 PLYM VALI 318
IHC= 600 PPM
ICOtACT] =
ICO[SPEC]=
INOX
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTEN
865 72 AMMO G
IHC= 480 PPM
ICOtACT] =
ICOtSPEC]=
INOX =
?:
OTHER TESTS:
HEXANE
9 . 8 5&CO
0 .5 %CQ
34 PPM
ANCE
REM 232
HEXANE
4? 1 ro
• £• ft \s\J
1 .5 %CQ
60 PPM
AFTER MAINTENANCE
TEST TYPE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
GRAMS
HC CO
10.
8.
7.
9.
8.
EFF
5.
3.
4.
4.
4.
8.
5.
5.
6.
6.
EFF
6.
3.
4.
4.
4.
9.
7.
5.
8.
7.
37
38
22
33
48
49
35
55
37
12
01
74
93
82
26
58
39
10
92
24
60
56
93
54
54
144.
142.
106.
143.
133.
84.
20.
60.
50.
44.
86.
97.
69-
92.
87.
73.
37.
49.
54.
48.
142.
96.
78.
118.
100.
PER MILE
C02
0
6
9
3
2
0
1
1
7
1
6
0
9
0
4
8
6
1
9
2
0
7
0
3
9
592
533
519
561
541
661
665
577
663
640
427
386
377
406
392
457
484
422
471
461
302
338
293
321
318
.4
.1
.7
.5
.6
.3
.4
.9
.4
.7
.8
.0
.6
.0
.3
.6
.0
.3
.3
.7
.7
.0
.6
.1
.6
NOXC
4
2
4
3
3
3
2
4
3
3
3
1
3
2
2
2
1
2
1
1
0
0
1
0
1
EFF
10.
7.
5.
8.
7.
73
24
81
91
57
152.
114.
83.
132.
113.
8
2
4
7
7
306
334
301
321
319
.1
.6
.7
.0
.8
0
0
1
1
•23
.82
.68
.50
.62
.49
.92
.19
.19
.38
.21
.79
.47
.47
.54
.04
.59
.54
.81
.94
.86
.95
.87
.91
.18
ft O
.83
0 II
.84
rt 1
.97
fill
. OH
4 C
.15
MPG
FUEL
ECOK
10.4
*• * ~
11.3
1 ' J
12.5
10.9
11.1
10.9
12.5
12.9
11.7
12.3
15.1
15.9
17.5
15.5
16.2
11.9
16.0
17-3
* f t
15-5
t t 4
16.1
16.0
no
• 3
n A It
20- 1
. / L
16. d
17 7
ll'l
15.3
ij>j
16-5
| V
1Q.7
1 /
15-9
17.0
C-124
-------
ON
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
N0. YR MAKE MODL CID
8711 72 CHEV VEGA 140
U 1 ' '
IHC= 450 PPM HEXANE
ICOtACT] = 9-2 *CO
ICO[SPEC]= N/A %CO
INOX = 55 PPM
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANCE
877 72 CHEV NOVA 30?
IHC= 1125 PPM HEXANE
ICOtACT] = 6.5 *CO
ICO[SPEC]= N/A %CO
INOX = 50 PPM
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANCE
883 72 CHEV MALI 30?
IHC= 860 PPM HEXANE
ICOtACT] = 10.0 *CO
»-,_-. i w • W ft \S \J
SPEC], ,,4 ,co
inux = 20 PPM
OTHER TESTS-
AFTER MAINTENANCE
«
TEST TYPE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
r
HC
4.
3.
3.
3-
3.
EFF
4.
2.
2.
3-
2.
7.
5.
6.
6.
6.
EFF
6.
4.
4.
5.
4.
6.
7.
6.
7.
7.
EFF
5.
3.
4.
4.
4.
63
10
37
83
49
44
51
40
43
88
45
45
33
40
10
35
18
36
22
68
48
51
90
01
13
02
68
25
32
1 1
JRAMS PER MILE
CO C02
81
63
63
71
67
67
30
40
48
40
102
72
76
87
79
90
36
59
62
53
108
114
110
111
112
72
43
78
57
59
.3
.0
.7
.8
.0
.5
. 1
.7
.0
.7
.4
.9
.5
.0
.9
. 1
.3
.2
.0
.6
.6
.5
.9
.7
.3
.7
.9
.7
.7
.3
267
280
228
274
263
265
294
235
280
272
482
461
422
471
455
517
552
458
535
519
442
396
363
418
397
475
489
396
482
461
.5
.6
.0
• 3
.5
.0
.3
.2
.3
.2
• 3
.4
.5
.4
. 1
.9
.2
.4
.8
.6
.9
.9
.8
.9
.3
.8
.0
.7
.7
. 1
NOXC
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
3
2
3
2
2
2
1
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
.34
.25
.41
.29
.31
.73
.38
.77
.55
.56
.09
.44
.87
.75
.96
.29
.92
.60
.10
.18
.60
.09
.32
.33
.26
.86
.31
.47
.57
.47
MPG
FUEL
ECON
21
22
26
22
23
23
25
28
24
25
13
15
15
14
14
13
14
15
13
14
14
14
15
14
14
14
15
16
15
15
.7
.8
.2
.2
.4
.0
.4
.9
.2
.7
.3
.0
.8
. 1
.8
. 1
.3
.7
.7
.3
.0
.8
.8
.4
.9
.6
.6
.6
. 1
.6
C-125
-------
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO. YR MAKE MODL CID
885 72 CHEV CHEL 350
IHC= 560 PPM HEXANE
ICOUCT] 10.0 %CO
ICO[SPEC]= N/A JCO
INOX = 30 PPM
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANCE
886 72 CHEV MONT 350
IHC= 400 PPM HEXANE
ICOUCT] = 10.0 J&CO
ICO[SPEC]= N/A %CQ
INOX - 30 PPM
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANCE
887 72 CHEV NOVA 350
IHC= 440 PPM HEXANE
ICOUCT] = 9.4 *CO
ICO[SPEC]= N/A *CO
INOX = 35 PPM
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANCE
TEST TYPE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
GRAMS PER MILE
HC CO C02 NOXC
6.
4.
7.
5.
5.
EFF
5.
3.
3.
4.
3.
6.
4.
4.
5.
5.
EFF
5.
3.
4.
4.
4.
7-
7.
7.
7.
j t
96
68
33
77
87
71
00
47
29
68
63
91
82
73
24
84
53
04
63
14
39
32
24
35
31
94
89
60
91
82
88
40
44
63
51
125
108
98
116
109
58
26
44
41
37
104
149
81
127
121
EFF"
6.
3.
4.
5.
4.
33
92
15
07
48
94
47
52
70
58
.0
.8
.8
.8
.8
• 3
.3
.9
.3
.4
.9
. 1
.8
.7
.3
.4
. 1
.6
.6
.8
.0
.7
.7
.8
.7
. 1
.9
.5
.0
.7
500
488
451
494
480
545
577
490
561
546
550
556
482
553
535
563
597
498
580
563
544
488
446
515
488
547
592
492
570
555
.6
.4
.6
.3
.9
.3
.0
.2
.8
.8
.2
.7
.5
.6
.1
.4
.0
.7
.9
.2
.6
.6
. 1
.4
.5
.1
.4
.5
.7
.8
3
1
3
2
2
3
1
3
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
2
2
2
2
0
2
1
1
2
1
2
4
1
1
•73
.76
.75
.70
.71
.08
.90
.43
.47
.56
.50
.27
.70
.38
.44
.75
.96
.80
.34
.35
.68
.98
.56
.79
.76
.30
"l <7
.37
li f\
.49
A 1
, 0 I
.87
til y
FUEL
ECOH
13
13
1 j
15
13
11
12
13
15
13
13
11
12
13
11
12
13
13
15
13
. h
11
12
14
1
11
12
4 0
12
12
it
15
I J
12
13
.3
' (*
.8
.6
.5
.1
.6
.1
.5
.2
.5
.5
.0
.6
.8
.3
.2
.1
_
.1
o
.7
•°
I
, U
.1
.1
.1
.7
J
C-126
-------
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
N0. YR MAKE MODL CID
889 72 CHEV MONT 350
IHC= 270 PPM HEXANE
ICOUCT] = 6.5 *CO
ICO[SPEC]= N/A *CO
INOX = 48 PPM
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANCE
890 72 CHEV NOVA 350
IHC = 1840 PPM HEXANE
ICOtACT] = 2.8 *CO
ICO[SPEC]= N/A JCO
INOX = 40 PPM
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANCE
891 72 CHEV MONT 400
ICO[1?T] = PM 7H5X*NE
ICO[SPEC]= N/A %CQ
NOX = 18 PPM
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANCE
TEST TYPE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
i
HC
6.
5.
5.
5.
5.
EFF
4.
3.
3.
3.
3.
14.
16.
9.
15.
14.
EFF
11 .
15.
9.
13.
12.
5.
6.
5.
6.
6.
EFF
10.
4.
3.
7.
5.
36
30
05
81
45
67
05
84
82
60
98
52
59
78
31
84
41
05
70
94
57
59
76
10
16
32
63
89
35
60
3RAMS PER MILE
CO C02
101
122
79
112
106
90
43
42
66
52
32
51
36
42
43
80
94
72
87
85
81
99
65
90
86
222
67
60
142
97
-3
.0
.4
.1
. 1
.2
.7
.4
.0
.9
.4
.6
.2
.4
.5
.9
. 1
.2
.8
.4
.0
.9
.8
.9
.7
.8
.8
.9
.0
.8
524
505
477
514
501
569
606
516
588
574
597
616
504
607
582
641
659
546
651
625
538
568
477
554
537
535
680
532
610
610
.0
.5
. 1
.3
.5
.5
. 1
.8
.6
.2
.6
.3
.6
.4
.0
.9
.7
.5
.2
.2
.9
.1
.1
.1
.2
.0
.5
.8
.8
.2
NOXC
4
1
4
3
3
2
1
2
2
2
4
2
4
3
3
3
1
2
2
2
2
1
2
1
1
0
0
1
0
1
.63
.72
.33
. 1 1
.03
.71
.51
.50
.09
.03
.48
.04
.34
.21
.17
.02
.44
.76
.19
. 12
.29
.05
.64
.64
.74
.73
.84
.77
.78
.07
MPG
FUEL
ECON
12
12
14
12
12
12
13
14
12
13
12
11
15
12
12
11
10
12
10
11
13
1 1
14
12
12
9
11
13
10
11
.6
.4
.4
.5
.9
.2
.0
.9
.6
• 3
.8
.8
.0
.3
.8
.0
.4
.9
.7
. 1
.0
.9
.8
.4
.8
.7
. 1
.9
.4
.4
C-127
-------
APPENDIX C.CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO. YR MAKE MODL CID
894 72 CHRY NEWP 400
IHCs 250 PPM HEXANE
ICOCACT] = 5.6 %CO
ICO[SPEC]= 0.5 *CO
INOX = 43 PPM
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANCE
895 72 DODG DART 225
IHC= 340 PPM HEXANE
ICOtACT] = 7.7 %CO
ICO[SPEC]= 0.5 $CO
INOX = 58 PPM
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANCE
897 72 DODG DART 318
IHC= 315 PPM HEXANE
ICO[ACT] = 1 .6 $CO
ICO[SPEC]= 0.5 %CQ
INOX . 22 PPM
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANCE
TEST TYPE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
GRAMS
HC CO
10.
5.
6.
7.
6.
EFF
10.
7.
6.
8.
7.
10.
4.
4.
7.
5.
EFF
6.
3-
3-
4.
3-
9-
9.
7.
9.
8.
EFF
6.
3.
4.
4.
4.
14
84
19
90
82
88
04
95
88
80
66
52
63
46
82
25
13
61
62
90
05
32
03
19
64
16
72
18
89
3M
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
85.
48.
29.
66.
50.
01 .
76.
47.
88.
73-
41.
02.
95.
21 .
08.
08.
44.
64.
75.
63-
30.
51 .
93-
41.
31 .
87.
32.
43-
58.
47.
PER MILE
C02 NOXC
4
4
1
1
7
4
2
4
3
5
6
4
0
2
5
4
8
5
3
3
9
2
7
5
4
3
9
8
9
1
536
525
489
531
518
546
560
499
553
541
301
292
293
296
291
327
344
315
336
333
449
421
409
435
424
510
550
475
531
521
.8
.7
.5
.0
.1
.6
.5
.9
.8
.1
.8
.3
.5
.9
.6
.2
.9
.8
.4
.3
.7
.7
.4
.1
.1
.4
.9
.1
.5
.9
2
1
2
1
1
1
0
2
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
2
2
1
2
2
1
3
2
2
2
1
•33
.04
.81
.66
.79
.93
.91
.16
.40
.46
.68
.34
.24
.50
.65
.90
.06
.62
.98
.18
.56
.71
.24
.12
.30
— ft
.37
o ^
.83
of.
. 0°
no
. V 7
5?
. t (•
HPQ
FUEL
ECON
10.3
J
1U
12.5
10.9
1U
9-9
10,3
11.8
10.1
10.6
15.9
19-0
19.*
17.»
18.»
17.2
20.9
20.1
ft *
18.9
19-5
13-0
4 1 fl
U.J
it 5
15-5
. i fl
12.;'
40 $
13-'
1U
i j.'
111.'
1 -i •
15-5
13-5
11.*
C-128
-------
APPENDIX C.CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO. YR MAKE MODL
8Q8 72 DODG POLA
v 7 w '
CID
360
IHC=15MO PPM HEXANE
ICOtACT] = 10.0
ICO[SPEC]= N/A
INOX = 13
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANC
899 72 FORD PINT
%CO
%CO
PPM
E
122
IHC= 330 PPM HEXANE
ICO[ACT] = 7.6
ICO[SPEC]= 1.2
INOX = 67
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANC
900 72 FORD PINT
•LnU™131in D DM UE*
j » v r t n H ci
ICO[ACT] = IK
ICO[SPEC]= M/A
= 1 03
OTHER TESTS-
AFTER MAINTENANC
%CO
%CO
PPM
E
98
XANE
*CO
PPM
E
»
TEST TYPE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
r
HC
13-
15.
1 1.
14.
14.
EFF
9.
4.
5.
6.
5.
5.
4.
4.
4.
4.
EFF
5.
3.
3.
4.
3.
6.
4.
4.
5.
5.
EFF
7-
4.
4.
5-
5.
87
68
71
82
23
04
09
56
46
51
29
47
03
86
52
09
54
74
28
92
12
71
81
39
03
12
51
97
76
17
JRAMS PER MILE
CO C02
229.
190.
142.
209.
185.
195.
70.
131.
130.
113.
86.
58.
47.
72.
61.
78.
30.
34.
53.
41.
90.
33.
59.
60.
52.
1 10.
38.
66.
73.
61.
5
5
4
2
4
9
5
7
5
0
9
9
9
3
6
4
6
0
5
4
0
1
5
3
0
5
7
3
1
0
469.
441 .
415.
455.
440.
570.
626.
513-
600.
584.
297.
294.
280.
296.
291 .
315.
321.
299.
318.
314.
259.
308.
255.
285.
284.
256.
308.
252.
284.
282.
4
9
5
1
4
8
9
9
0
5
2
9
3
0
4
1
5
6
4
2
7
9
7
4
3
8
9
8
0
9
NOXC
1 .
1 .
2.
1 .
1.
1 .
1 .
1 .
1 .
1 .
2.
3.
3.
2.
3.
2.
2.
3.
2.
2.
1.
2.
1 .
1.
2.
1 .
2.
2.
2.
2.
70
32
22
50
64
44
32
61
38
43
70
22
87
97
29
62
74
66
68
97
51
26
97
90
03
55
73
18
16
34
MPG
FUEL
ECON
10.2
11 .2
13.1
10.7
11.4
9.8
11.8
12.0
10.7
11.4
19.7
22. 1
24. 1
20.9
22.0
19.5
23-3
24.3
21.3
22.7
21 . 1
23-6
24.3
22.3
23-2
19.6
23-1
23.8
21.3
22.5
C-129
-------
APPENDIX C.CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO. YR
901 72
IHC =
MAKE MODL CID
FORD P
450 PPM
ICOCACT] -
ICO[S
INpX
OTHER
AFTER
902 72
IHC =
PEC] =
—
TESTS:
INT 98
HEXANE
9.0 $CO
N/A *CO
48 PPM
MAINTENANCE
FORD MAVE 200
130 PPM
HEXANE
TEST TYPE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
GRAMS PER MI
HC CO C02
5.
4.
4.
5.
5.
EFF
5.
4.
3-
4.
4.
7.
4.
4.
80
97
67
37
06
43
07
84
72
29
46
40
62
92
58
70
75
68
84
35
52
58
50
119
153
104
.9
.5
.2
.0
.8
. 1
.7
.7
.9
.3
.9
.0
.7
239.
256.
225.
248.
244.
251 .
287.
242.
270.
267.
327-
395.
293-
LE
NOXC
6
6
5
4
6
6
5
4
3
8
6
0
7
1.86
1.92
2.20
1.89
1.99
2.22
2.64
2.53
2.44
2.52
0.73
0.15
0.61
i« o
FUEL
ECON
22 fl
* w i y
2U
25.3
23.2
21.1
22.1
21). 9
26.3
23.5
21.6
16.1
13.1
18.8
ICO[ACT] = 1.7 %CO
ICO[SPEC]= N/A *CO 72 FTP
INOX = 60 PPM
5.87 137.2 362.8 0.58 11.9
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANCE
903 72 FORD MUST 351
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
IHC= 940 PPM HEXANE
ICOUCT] = 1 .1 JCO
ICO[SPEC]= N/A *CO 72 FTP
INOX = 43 PPM
5.
09
1
33
.0
353-
5
0.
55
15-3
EFF
1
6.
3.
3.
4.
4.
4.
4.
4.
22
56
58
83
1 1
62
64
88
1
1
02
97
63
00
89
202
52
40
.7
.6
.2
. 1
.3
.3
.1
.9
316.
385-
293.
352.
346.
613-
636.
579-
7
4
5
5
2
8
8
3
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
2.
2.
4.
98
52
96
74
73
64
15
40
11.8
16.1
22.0
t f A
16.9
... n
17.»
9-1
- - 4
12.1
., c
13-5
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANCE
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
9.
6.
42
76
1
24.
80.
0
0
625.
616.
8
4
2
2
EFF
2
1
9.
3-
4.
5.
9.
93
10
65
94
04
2
1
43-
47.
50.
41 .
88.
8
3
0
4
5
730.
846.
684.
791-
778.
8
5
1
1
4
2
1
2
1
1
• «J
.86
.00
ii n
.49
f i
.63
n O
.73
A 1
.9'
IU."1
11.«
1 ?
1 "
Q.5
/ *
11.'
1 i *
8.3
9-'
/
C-130
-------
ON
APPENDIX C.CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VFH
N0. YR MAKE MODL CID
004 72 FORD MAVE 302
7 V • 1
IHC=2000 PPM HEXANE
ICOtACT] = 0.9 *CO
ICO[SPEC]= N/A %CO
INOX = 156 PPM
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANCE
906 72 FORD MAVE 250
IHC = 1060 PPM HEXANE
ICOtACT] = 10.0 *CO
ICO[SPEC]= N/A %CO
INOX = 20 PPM
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANCE
9°7 72 FORD GALA 400
T u o
JHC= 300 PPM HEXANE
ICOtACT] = 7.8 %CQ
JCOtSPECjr N/A irn
Inn Y P**\J
u* = 35 PPM
OTHER TESTS -
AFTER MAINTENANCE
TEST TYPE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
t
HC
8.
8.
7-
8.
8.
EFF
5.
4.
4.
4.
4.
5.
7.
6.
6.
6.
EFF
4.
3-
4.
3.
3.
7.
5.
4.
6.
5.
EFF
5.
3.
4.
4.
4.
29
77
36
54
29
48
38
81
91
73
86
15
21
53
63
00
25
18
61
66
10
90
98
48
90
51
48
29
45
12
JRAMS PER MILE
CO C02
52
39
40
45
42
57
51
41
54
50
76
104
69
91
89
47
27
40
36
35
128
100
81
113
101
115
52
66
82
69
.9
.0
.0
.6
. 1
.9
.6
.9
.6
.2
.7
.4
.8
. 1
.2
. 1
.5
.6
.9
. 1
.3
.3
.8
.7
.0
.4
.6
.7
.7
.4
474
460
430
467
455
446
443
444
445
444
393
339
337
365
349
421
420
369
420
406
560
542
500
551
534
626
643
554
635
615
.7
.5
.2
.3
. 1
.5
.7
.5
. 1
.5
.0
.3
. 1
.0
.7
.4
. 1
.1
.7
.5
.3
.8
.8
.2
.9
.4
.0
.0
. 1
.3
NOXC
5.
2.
5.
4.
4.
2.
1 .
3.
2.
2.
5.
2.
4.
4.
3-
5.
3.
5.
4.
4.
3.
2.
4.
3.
3-
2.
2.
3.
2.
2.
61
93
29
21
13
89
20
05
01
05
29
89
49
04
82
99
83
08
86
62
71
75
38
21
39
75
44
48
59
79
MPG
FUEL
ECON
15
16
17
15
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
19
16
17
17
18
19
18
18
11
12
13
1 1
12
10
12
13
1 1
12
.2
.1
.2
.7
.2
.0
.5
-9
.2
.5
.7
.9
.0
.8
.4
.5
.7
.9
. 1
.8
.3
.3
.8
.8
.5
.8
.0
.2
.4
.0
C-131
-------
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE
DENVER
PROCEDURE
AND AFTER
RESULTS
MAINTENANCE
VEH
NO. YR MAKE MODL CID
909 72 FORD LTD 429
IHC= 100 PPM HEXANE
ICO[ACT] = 1 .7 *CO
ICO[SPEC]= N/A %CQ
INOX = 24 PPM
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANCE
91 1 72 FORD GALA 400
IHC= 390 PPM HEXANE
ICOtACT] = 8.2 *CO
ICO[SPEC]= N/A *CO
INOX = 39 PPM
OTHER TESTS-
AFTER MAINTENANCE
912 72 MERC COME 250
IHC= 320 PPM HEXANE
ICO[ACT] = 5.9 *CO
ICO[SPEC]= N/A *CO
INOX = 69 PPM
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANCE
TEST TYPE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
GRAMS
HC CO
7.
3.
4.
5.
4.
EFF
4.
2.
3.
3-
3.
5.
4.
4.
4.
4.
EFF
5.
3.
4.
4.
4.
5.
4.
4.
4.
4.
EFF
4.
3-
4.
4.
4.
22
21
61
13
42
98
58
44
73
31
00
44
65
71
61
92
41
02
61
09
07
56
61
80
68
43
73
28
07
03
123.
28.
69.
73.
59.
1 17.
29.
67.
71 .
58.
72.
76.
54.
74.
69.
68.
38.
33.
52.
43.
85.
85.
59.
85.
78.
64.
39.
41.
51.
45.
PER MI
C02
6
3
0
9
0
3
4
7
5
0
6
2
3
5
5
0
2
2
5
0
0
3
9
1
3
8
6
1
7
2
658.
678.
587.
668.
649.
650.
703.
585.
678.
660.
696.
596.
586.
644.
614.
663-
609-
547-
635.
603-
415-
415-
391-
415-
408.
434.
442.
393-
438.
427.
LE
NOXC
3
7
9
9
7
8
0
5
0
2
8
8
2
7
5
1
8
4
3
7
4
1
7
2
8
5
1
1
5
2
4.
3.
4.
3.
3.
3.
2.
4.
3.
3-
3-
1.
3-
2.
2.
5-
3-
5.
4.
4.
4.
2.
4.
3.
3-
5.
3-
H.
4.
*•
07
17
91
60
83
62
94
26
26
41
02
86
10
42
44
26
36
91
27
45
72
64
63
63
61
ft A
30
A *7
07
rr ft
79
n
0
HPO
FUEL
ECON
10
12
12
11
11
10
11
12
11
11
10
12
12
11
12
11
13
11
12
13
,]
.1
.5
.1
.?
.*
.?
.6
.1
.?
.?
.1
.9
.4
,0
.3
.0
.5
.
A
.0
15-?
ic 7
15-'
17 7
17'
t C
1
15-'
ifi I
ID.'
l6-
I V *
If.
18.
16-
1
2
8
?
4
C-132
-------
ON
APPENDIX C.CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
N0. YR MAKE MODL
019 72 PLYM VALI
7 ' '
CID
198
IHC= 410 PPM HEXANE
ICOtACT] = 8.8
ICO[SPEC]= 0.5
INOX = 46
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANCE
925 72 PONT LEMA
*CO
%CO
PPM
350
IHC= 420 PPM HEXANE
ICOtACT] = 7.8
ICO[SPEC]= N/A
INOX = 48
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANCE
929 72 DATS B110
IHC= 430 PPM HEX
ICO[SPEC]= a'.o
*NOX _ li n
*40
OTHER TESTS-
AFTER MAINTENANCE
*CO
%CO
PPM
72
ANE
*CO
PPM
TEST TYPE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
r
HC
9.
8.
6.
9.
8.
EFF
5.
3.
4.
4.
4.
8.
6.
5.
7.
6.
EFF
8.
3.
4.
6.
4.
4.
3.
4.
4.
3.
EFF
3-
2.
3.
2.
2.
17
88
88
02
40
41
83
55
59
35
06
08
65
03
37
27
98
34
03
96
74
53
16
1 1
95
02
39
27
6^9
76
JRAMS PER MILE
CO C02
99.
99.
85.
99.
95.
68.
33.
58.
50.
47.
130.
119.
80.
124.
1 10.
121 .
61 .
57-
90.
72.
54.
44.
38.
49.
44.
26.
22.
19-
24.
22.
4
1
4
3
4
9
0
4
2
3
2
3
4
5
9
9
0
3
1
5
3
7
0
3
8
7
6
6
5
6
326
304
288
315
304
346
360
312
353
344
541
531
474
536
518
576
617
523
597
583
257
257
237
257
252
251
257
227
254
247
.9
.0
.7
.0
.5
.2
.4
.5
.6
.4
.2
.7
.8
.2
. 1
.1
. 1
. 1
.5
.0
.9
.5
.2
.7
.1
.0
.6
.0
.4
.9
NOXC
2
1
2
2
2
3
2
3
3
3
2
1
3
1
2
2
1
2
1
1
2
1
2
2
2
2
1
2
1
1
.83
.82
• 90
.30
.32
.33
.80
.23
.05
.02
.56
.28
.03
.89
.02
.20
.22
.44
.69
.76
.55
.89
.83
.21
.28
.35
.22
.34
.76
.76
MPG
FUEL
ECON
17.3
18.2
20.0
17.8
18.4
18.8
20.9
21 .2
19.9
20.5
1 1.5
12.0
14.3
11.8
12.5
11.2
12.2
14.2
11.7
12.5
24.8
26.2
28.6
25.5
26.5
29-3
29-5
33-1
29-4
30.4
C-133
-------
APPENDIX C.CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO. YR MAKE MODL
930 72 DATS 510
CID
97
IHC= 600 PPM HEXANE
ICOCACT] - 7-4
ICO[SPEC]= 2.0
INOX = 35
*
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANCE
931 72 OPEL 1900
JCO
%co
PPM
116
IHCa 200 PPM HEXANE
ICOCACT] - 3-4
ICO[SPEC]= N/A
INOX - 72
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANCE
932 72 TOYO CORO
%CQ
%CO
PPM
71
IHC= 960 PPM HEXANE
ICOCACT] = 10.0
ICOtSPEC]= 3.0
INOX = 35
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTENANCE
%co
%co
PPM
TEST TYPE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
H
4.
4.
3-
4.
4.
EFF
4.
4.
3-
4.
4.
4.
3-
3.
3.
3-
EFF
4.
4.
3.
4.
3.
5.
4.
4.
4.
4.
EFF
4.
12.
4.
8.
8.
--GRAMS PER MILE
C CO C02 NOXC
45
16
39
30
01
22
34
50
29
09
05
1 1
08
56
30
98
03
00
48
94
46
54
66
98
76
55
14
56
51
51
35
34
22
34
31
34
35
27
35
33
59
40
23
49
39
48
23
10
35
25
71
65
64
68
66
48
54
39
51
48
. 1
.7
.7
.9
.5
.7
.6
.0
.2
.1
.4
.4
.3
.5
.6
.7
.6
.0
.6
. 1
.4
.4
.4
.3
.4
.2
. 1
.6
.3
.9
298
285
260
292
281
294
268
262
281
272
381
344
348
362
353
399
372
373
385
378
271
302
255
287
283
267
323
257
296
293
.6
.9
. 1
.0
.5
.6
.8
.6
.2
.4
.8
.3
.2
.2
. 1
.0
.4
.5
.2
.2
.2
.6
.9
.6
.4
.5
. 1
.2
.5
.7
3
1
3
2
2
4
2
4
3
3
5
2
5
4
4
5
2
3
4
3
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
.17
.89
.13
.50
.49
.53
.77
.32
.61
.56
.45
.89
.72
.11
.19
.44
.81
.51
.07
.54
.55
.03
.44
.28
.25
n n
.27
r ft
.59
•^
HPC
FUEL
ECOJ
21 1
** • * i
25.1
29.0
21. &
25.8
211.5
26.2
28.1
25.1
26.3
18.2
21.3
22.5
19.7
20.8
18.1
21.0
22.3
. _ p
19-5
.. /
20.6
22.1
A i 1
21.1
Ol 0
23-'
ft (:
21.&
nf\ fl
22. u
zU
U~
19.9
17'
26.6
£V
22.0
ft***
22.3
C-134
-------
ON
APPENDIX C.CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
N0. YR MAKE MODL CID
933 72 TOYO S
/ J J
IHC= 580 PPM
ICOtACT] =
ICO[SPEC]=
INOX
OTHER TESTS:
AFTER MAINTEN
TAW 97
HEXANE
8.0 %CO
3.0 %CQ
40 PPM
ANCE
935 72 VOLK CONV 97
IHC= 380 PPM
ICOtACT] -
ICO[SPEC] =
INOX =
OTHER TESTS:
HEXANE
9.2 %CQ
3.0 %CQ
55 PPM
AFTER MAINTENANCE
TEST TYPE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
SC/3M MTCE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 FTP
75 FTP
n
HC
5.
4.
3.
5.
4.
EFF
4.
3.
3-
4.
3.
8.
6.
5.
7.
6.
EFF
7.
7.
5.
7.
7.
95
32
97
10
56
78
70
39
22
84
93
44
94
63
81
90
98
53
9^
30
RAMS PER MILE
CO C02
82
74
63
78
73
87
75
68
80
75
80
98
75
90
88
58
95
57
77
77
.8
.3
.6
.4
. 1
. 1
.2
.5
.9
.8
.8
.5
.0
.0
.5
.2
.5
.7
.6
.5
290.
250.
255.
269.
259.
323.
299.
283.
311.
300.
332.
341.
302.
337.
329.
312.
299.
283.
305.
297.
0
0
3
1
7
8
1
6
0
0
4
3
8
1
0
5
3
7
6
8
N
2
0
2
1
1
2
0
1
1
1
2
0
1
1
1
2
0
1
1
1
oxc
.42
.98
.25
.67
.62
.06
.73
-90
.36
.32
.05
.95
.44
.48
.31
.19
.85
.81
.49
.39
MPG
FUEL
ECON
20.2
23-3
24. 1
21.7
22.8
18.7
20.7
22. 1
19.7
20.6
18.2
17-2
20.2
17.7
18.1
20.7
18.7
22.6
19.6
20.0
C-135
-------
C-136
-------
APPENDIX D
-------
APPENDIX D - LISTING OF HIGHWAY FUEL ECONOMY AND EMISSION
RESULTS ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES
Legend
VEHICLE - Vehicle Number
YEAR - Model Year
JUKE - Vehicle Make
j*)DEL - Vehicle Model
CID - Engine Displacement in Cubic Inches
HC - Hydrocarbon Emissions in grams per mile
CO - Carbon Monoxide Emissions in grains per mile
C02 - Carbon Dioxide Emissions in grams per mile
NOXC - Oxides of Nitrogen Emissions corrected for humidity in
grams per mile
MPG - Fuel Economy in miles per gallon, Calcaulated Using the
Carbon Balance Method
D-l
-------
APPENDIX D
LISTING OF HIGHWAY FUEL ECONOMY AND EMISSION
RESULTS OF INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES
DENVER
VEHICLE
001
002
003
004
005
006
007
008
009
010
011
012
013
014
015
016
017
018
019
020
021
022
023
024
025
026
027
028
029
030
031
032
033
034
035
036
YEAR
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
MAKE
CHEV
CHEV
CHEV
CHEV
DODG
FORD
FORD
FORD
FORD
CMC
AMMO
BUIC
BUIC
BUIC
CADI
CHEV
CHEV
CHEV
CHEV
CHEV
CHEV
CHRY
DODG
DODG
FORD
FORD
FORD
FORD
FORD
MERC
MERC
OLDS
OLDS
OLDS
PLYM
PLYM
MODEL
TRUC
TRUC
TRUC
TRUC
TRUC
TRUC
TRUC
TRUC
TRUC
TRUC
HORN
CNTY
RIVI
REGA
ELDO
VEGA
NOVA
MONT
CAPR
IMPA
STAW
NEWP
CORO
DART
MUST
TORI
GRAN
LTD
LTD
MARQ
MONO
DELT
CUTL
DELT
FURY
DUST
CID
350
350
350
350
318
302
302
351
351
350
258
350
455
350
500
140
250
350
350
350
400
400
318
225
140
351
250
351
400
400
351
350
350
455
318
225
H
0.
1 .
0 .
0.
0.
0.
0.
1 .
1 .
0.
1 .
0.
0.
1 .
4.
0 .
0.
0.
1 .
1 .
0.
0.
0.
1 .
0.
0.
0.
2.
0.
1 .
0.
1 .
1 .
0.
0.
1 .
--G
C
75
18
51
22
52
44
16
19
U3
19
09
58
76
47
98
46
12
44
50
18
43
28
30
96
17
44
14
04
31
91
82
83
92
50
93
27
RAMS P
CO
18.9
42.2
13.4
2. 1
7-3
25.7
2.0
24.1
21 .2
0.4
8.3
24.9
24.4
41 .0
167. 1
13-3
3-2
20.4
38 .0
52.8
16.8
21 .0
3.7
48.9
5.9
14.7
1.8
55.2
23.4
55.6
38.1
57.5
56.3
11 .8
19.7
23.9
ER MI
C.02
417.
444.
495.
549.
503.
475.
410.
447.
442.
510.
324.
409.
515.
428.
471 .
239-
396.
425.
433-
426.
652.
550.
461 .
298.
329.
499.
454.
435.
535.
503-
467.
413-
390.
451 •
399-
289-
LE-
7
5
8
9
9
2
8
0
1
7
9
6
1
0
1
9
4
3
0
5
4
6
1
4
8
3
0
3
2
6
3
2
1
6
4
5
NOXC
1.66
2.91
1.16
4.58
2.92
0.87
0.89
3.54
3.97
1.72
2.76
1.16
1.38
1.28
0.91
2.08
2.34
2.00
1.55
1.93
1.77
2.57
3-30
2.09
1.25
2.04
1.01
2.86
1.25
_ •—
2.05
4 A
2.10
. o 1
1.3"
0.98
• "3(\
1 .3"
— o H
2.24
. 6ij
1 .0*
HPG
FUEL
ECON
19 7
' ' 1
17.2
17.1
16.0
17.2
17.2
21.11
18.2
18.5
17-3
26.0
19.7
16.0
17.9
11.8
33-8
22.1
19-3
17-8
17-3
13-0
15-2
19.0
, ~ *
23-3
26.1
*i Q
10.7
10 \
19.1
iA 8
1D.°
15-5
111 9
M.'
ifj.8
1 v *
17.'
i i
18.3
18.8
20-5
26-8
D-2
-------
LISTING
APPENDIX D,CONT'D
OF HIGHWAY FUEL ECONOMY AND EMISSION
RESULTS OF INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES
DENVER
VEHICLE
p. f\T1
037
nqQ
U JO
n7Q
u jy
040
041
V • •
042
V ~ w
043
044
045
YEAR
75
I -*
75
75
76
75
75
75
75
75
MAKE
PONT
PONT
PONT
CAPR
DATS
HOND
TOYO
VOLK
VOLK
MODEL
CATA
LEMA
GRNV
SEDA
B210
SEDA
CORO
SEDA
STAW
CID
400
350
455
140
85
91
133
97
90
0
0
0
1
1
1
0
1
0
HC
.20
.75
.32
.72
.14
.05
.93
.73
.32
Rfl M^ P
n ll O r
CO
4.1
23.6
13.0
57.2
19.5
35.8
15.4
20.6
4.2
ER MT
A 11 X
C02
467.
439.
510.
233.
234.
195.
278.
213-
325.
T F
Li £j
6
5
1
8
4
1
8
5
6
NOXC
4.30
1 .28
1 .70
0.66
3.00
1 .74
5.11
3.01
1.61
MPG
V IT IT I
r u HiL.
ECON
18.7
18.5
16.7
27.0
33.0
34.9
29.0
35.3
26.6
D-3
-------
-------
APPENDIX E
-------
APPENDIX E - LISTING OF MODAL RESULTS ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES
Legend
- Vehicle Number
- Model Year
- Vehicle Make
MODL - Vehicle Model
CID - Engine Displacement in Cubic Inches
DDE HO. - Lists the Individual Modes of the Test
1 through 32 - Modes of the Surveillance Driving Sequence
(SDS), listed on the following page
BAG ACT. - Results of the entire SDS as measured using the
CVS
BAG CALC.- Results of entire SDS obtained by combining
individual nodes
33 - Idle Mode
34 - S MPH Steady State
35 - 10 MPH Steady State
36 - 15 MPH Steady State
37 - 30 MPH Steady State
38 - 45 MPH Steady State
39 - 60 MPH Steady State
HC - Hydrocarbon Emissions in grams per mile
CO - Carbon Monoxide Emissions in grams per mile
C02 - Carbon Dioxide Emissions in grams per mile
- Oxides of Nitrogen Emissions in grams per mile (not
Humidity Corrected)
- Fuel Economy in miles per gallon. Calculated Using the
Carbon Balance Method
E-l
-------
SURVEILLANCE DRIVING SEQUENCE
Node
Speed Range
1 Accel
2 Decel
3 Accel
4 Accel
5 Accel
6 Decel
7 Accel
8 Decel
9 Accel
10 Decel
11 Accel
12 Decel
13 Accel
14 Decel
15 Decel
16 Decel
17 Accel
18 Decel
19 Accel
20 Decel
21 Accel
22 Decel
23 Accel
24 Accel
25 Decel
26 Decel
27 Accel
28 Decel
29 Accel
30 Accel
31 Decel
32 Decel
(nph)
0-30
30-0
0-15
15-30
30-45
45-30
30-60
60-45
45-60
60-15
15-60
60-0
0-60
60-30
30-15
15-0
0-45
45-15
15-45
45-0
0-60
60-0
0-30
30-60
60-30
30-0
0-60
60-0
0-30
30-60
60-30
30-0
Tims in Mode
SSS
12
16
8
11
13
12
17
12
14
30
26
21
32
23
9
8
22
16
18
19
25
28
15
25
18
10
38
35
18
21
14
13
Average Accel-
Average Speed oration Rate
18.05
16.66
9.04
23.07
37.65
38.05
45.80
51.48
52.54
40.40
43.42
33.83
37.27
46.86
23.18
7.81
28.85
31.33
30.55
24.72
38.28
33.88
17.73
45.14
47.23
15.99
38.01
33.87
17.73
44.55
46.63
16.40
taph/aec)
2.50
I*1***
.88
1.88
1.36
1.15
-1.25
1.76
-1.25
1.07
-1.50
1.73
-2.86
1.88
-1.30
-1.67
-1.88
2.05
-1.88
1.67
-2.37
2.40
-2.14
2.00
1.20
-1.67
-3.00
1.58
-1.71
1.67
1.43
-2.14
-2.31
. s*own<
1*5
0.0602
0.0741
0.0201
0.0705
0.1360
0.1268
0.2163
0.1716
0.2043
0.3367
0.3136
0.1973
0.3313
0.2994
0.0579
0.0173
0.1759
0.1392
0.1528
0.1304
0.2654
0.2634
0.0737
0.3134
0.2362
0.0444
0.4009
0.3293
0.0886
0.2599
0.1813
0.0592
E-2
-------
APPENDIX E
LISTING OP MODAL RESULTS ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES
DENVER
no.
"l
2
\
1
1
1?
11
12
H
8
9
19
20
21
22
1?
3
11
3
11
BIG
id.
cue.
33
35
JJ
36
37
38
39
u0u YEAR
Von IB****
001 1975
HC CO
i:B '« '
1:3 «:!
2.80 153.Q
0.42 10.6
0.44 6.4
1.53 10.9
3-33 105-3
1.53 10.9
3.12 106.4
1.20 10.7
1.61 32.6
5.25 110.3
5.05 184.6
1.76 16.0
3.8J 72.0
2.12 21.5
?:8 TO
8:8 19W
53 4?:!
f:S I?:8
ffl !S:«
0-68 10.8
2.16 36.9
2.40 46.8
1-96 45.8
0.51 5.9
5.00 94.n
3.99 99.3
3 Oh *«
•84 101.3
1 3T MA
'•37 38.1
1 flt «UB ..
'•0' 27.4
A f\f
0.06 o.O
HAKE
CHEV
C02
813-2
3tO.O
tOOl .2
507.6
590.4
236.2
559.7
225.2
693.3
242.4
IK:*
SIM
112:1
787.6
248.5
687.3
242.2
576:1
211.0
320.7
620.6
242.1
698.2
606.2
III:!
490.7
439.0
89.5
968.0
705.9
682.8
487.9
347.5
471.7
MODL
THOC
NOX
2.07
0.14
1.04
1. 53
2.83
0.33
m
3.01
0.47
fcW
8:ti
0.16
0.49
1.81
0.31
1:11
2.68
0.38
2.50
3.42
8:?8
III
1.85
3.28
0.40
0.18
2.13
1.55
0.02
0.44
0.32
0.60
0.87
1.05
2.70
CID
350
MPG
2tt
tJ:f
lit
58:1
15.5
35.9
10.2
33.6
10.4
37.7
3I:1
38:!
38:!
8.6
32.5
148:1
38.7
22.3
12.0
32. S
i!:l
11:!
15.5
17.2
88.4
7.8
10.1
10.4
16.1
22.5
18.8
VEH YEAR
002 T975
HC CO
4.32 T59.8
3.23 t02.4
7.04 305.4
3.T2 W.O
T.41 42.1
2.21 3t.9
1:tl 2\l:l
0.66 21.7
2.80 30-6
2.32 98.9
3.88 43.2
2.38 112.0
2.92 34.3
1.97 68.4
5.94 231.9
2.35 91-8
2.68 44.3
1.84 84.9
3.55 59.1
4.00 225.6
3.86 49.0
3.26 143.8
1.53 6T. 3
2.81 32.5
2.94 109.9
2.14 88.2
3.26 48.2
3.98 154.5
2.25 117.5
3.01 34.0
3.05 107.1
2.47 76.1
2.46 78.9
0.77 32.5
9.97 350.8
4.97 163.4
3.70 130.0
1.69 62.5
0.14 1.7
1.30 51.3
MAKE
CHEV
C02
t057.1
306.5
1038.8
726.8
662.5
213.3
744.9
241.0
713.9
238.3
804.8
235.8
833.1
223.1
229.6
577.5
853.9
226.7
812.5
260.0
868.1
242.4
917.0
700.2
220.3
329.9
744.4
250.6
817.9
731.5
209.7
313.7
502.7
498.3
71.4
914.7
473.0
386.2
325.3
436.2
466.0
MODL
TRUC
NOX
8:2*
1.13
2.39
m
2.68
t.23
m
S:8
\:ll
0.51
0.71
S:88
0* On
6 • 04
1:11
i:ti
?:Ti
3.02
5.56
1.32
0.91
2.74
2.86
0.05
0.58
0.35
0.29
0.57
1.10
3.66
CID
350
MPG
ttt
1:8
T2-i
32.6
ill
11.8
29.1
Q.2
28.1
8.7
31.0
25.9
9.2
8.8
29.1
*u
2?:§
iT:l
V:l
J8:t
1:1
18:8
14.1
14.1
71.0
5.9
11.9
14.7
20.7
20.2
16.1
VEH YEAR MAKE
003 T975 CHEV
HC CO C02
9.97 270.8 t071.2
f.02 0.0 342.6
T.61 0.0 1369.6
5.7t 107.2 891.6
1.00 14.4 637.1
0.78 0.0 245.5
5.82 405.3 603.9
0.93 3.5 294.1
1.01 50.6 685.0
0.55 2.2 273.9
6.02 351.0 613.9
0.88 4.0 279.0
6.47 316.0 695.4
0.53 2.9 275.4
0.63 o.o 403.3
0.00 0.0 671.0
9.17 326.2 697.6
0.55 0.0 246.6
10.39 354.4 659.3
0.69 0.0 299.4
11.57 508.2 659.2
0.86 4.0 287.3
7.01 133.8 1040-3
1.45 118.0 628.9
0.47 3.8 260.1
0.11 0.0 346.2
6.22 253.7 648.3
0.51 2.6 295.9
5.13 113.3 1041.5
2.96 250.9 597.7
0.53 4.8 273.5
0.11 0.0 337.5
2.40 92.3 512.6
2.36 93.0 511.3
0.05 0.0 74.4
0.72 0.0 876.9
0.34 1.5 1260.8
0.21 0.0 540.9
0.54 1.5 574.6
0.29 1-2 433-3
0.48 17.0 539.9
MODL
TRUC
NOX
§:§!
1:11
Ml
0.74
0.78
2.24
0.60
1.18
0.48
1.55
0.49
0.45
0.59
1.18
0.32
0.90
0.33
0.85
0.44
2.00
1.39
0.44
0.47
1.35
0.43
1.50
0.95
0.46
0.42
1.05
1.05
0.03
0.35
1.03
0.41
0.79
0.99
1.51
CID
350
HPG
5.8
25.7
8:1
11:1
7.0
29.3
11.6
31.8
30:!
T-3
31.5
21.9
13.2
7.2
35.7
2l:l
2i:I
6-9
10.8
§:i
8.3
29.4
7.2
8.9
III
13-3
13-3
119.0
10.1
7.0
16.4
15.3
20.4
15.6
RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE (PER MINUTE FOR IDLE)
FOBL IH "^ PBB Q*LLO" (MINUTES PER GALLON FOR IDLE)
BCONOMt CALCUUTIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
B-3
-------
APPENDIX E.CONT'D
LISTING OF MODAL RESULTS ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES
DENVER
MODE
NO.
1
2
I
I
9
10
11
12
12
15
16
}l
11
21
22
l\
25
26
11
29
30
31
32
VEH YEAR
001 1975
HC CO
0.61 5.5
0.15 0.0
0.86 38.9
0.31 o.o
0.43 8.7
0.20 0.0
6.69 369.1
0.28 0.0
1.96 198.9
0.15 0.0
3.21 331.5
0.18 0.0
1.89 205.1
0.12 0.0
0.07 0.0
0.22 0.0
0.16 12.2
0.15 0.0
0.36 o.o
0.16 0.0
5.55 118.1
0.18 0.0
0.31 1.1
2.23 229.1
0.13 0.0
0.11 0.0
1.18 161.8
0.11 0.0
0.31 o.o
3.63 331.5
0.18 0.0
0.10 0.0
MAKE
CHEV
C02
1228.0
309.8
1368.3
830.1
717.6
215.1
711.2
253.3
655.1
212.1
m
i$.i
232.1
563.8
982.1
215.8
918.7
259.1
813.6
252.7
^IU
231.1
317.7
778.8
263.8
931.7
613.7
228.9
301.5
MODL
TRUC
NOX
6.05
0.28
2.09
1.05
m
1.02
1.30
2.31
1.01
1.62
1.00
2.96
1.20
0.21
0.61
111
I'll
1.18
0.88
?:B
1.00
0.30
3.15
0.95
1.19
1.03
1.20
0.29
CID
350
MPG
2?:I
6.2
10.7
12.1
11.1
6.6
31.9
9.1
36.5
356:?
il:l
38.1
15.7
8.8
11.0
?.-6
35.2
5.8
35.0
8.1
8.6
38.3
27.5
8.6
33.6
9.5
7.5
38.7
29.1
VEH TEAR
005 1975
HC CO
9.05 317.2
3.62 66.9
11.06 277.9
1.77 89.6
2.98 13.6
1.13 8.0
1.78 211.9
0.10 0.5
1.67 10.8
1.71 12.6
5.10 211.3
2.08 11.3
5.65 216.1
1.89 10.9
):?! i»:«
1:18 !IM
1.62 115.3
2.97 35.0
6.57 326.1
1.96 17.3
5.92 130.9
3.22 89.5
1.76 10.2
3.11 68.2
3.72 77.2
2.57 21.8
5.56 125.0
1.17 202.2
1.51 9.8
3.63 68.1
MAKE
DODG
C02
92? -5
271.3
1051.1
705.5
631.1
205.3
18:1
8:1
707.7
239.3
710.9
221.2
225.6
199.1
785.2
205.1
739.1
212.1
763.3
211. 8
923.5
629.0
220.3
283.3
722.6
237.6
796.2
630.2
3:i
HODL
TRUC
NOX
2.03
0.57
l:\l
I'M
1.85
0.77
3$
Ml
2.25
0.71
0.51
0.30
§:*z
3:u
MI
1:8
0.61
0.19
§:72
!:II
W§
CID
318
MPG
6.1
22.7
5.8
10.3
12.5
39.9
8.5
33-3
12.2
35.6
8.1
33.1
8.0
35.9
?!:T
3i:l
&l
6.8
32.2
7.7
11.1
36.7
22.1
10.1
31.2
8.8
9.2
36.1
22.9
VEH YEAR
006 ?975
HC CO
19.29 368.2
0.78 1.1
1.13 2.7
2.39 19.9
0.85 57.5
0.11 0.6
5.52 259.3
0.21 2.1
1.02 52.1
0.12 7.5
6.62 286.2
0.27 3-7
8.19 286.2
0.26 10.7
0.20 1.0
0.10 3-1
10.18 302.6
0.39 0.8
1.91 220.7
0.31 i.o
9.81 311.1
0.10 8.2
10.32 232.5
2.23 116.3
0.19 9.6
0.20 1.5
5.18, 190.3
0.16 1.5
6.86 158.0
1.97 137.9
0.12 1.1
0.19 1-5
MAKE
FORD
C02
822.5
117.5
1531.2
720.3
18:1
590.1
300.5
668.7
292.7
535.1
311.5
605.5
279.5
311.0
859.3
617.1
285.7
616.2
337.5
516.6
315.5
875.6
600.3
m
626.2
321.2
855.5
661.5
261.5
111.2
MODL CID
THUC 302
NOX HPG
oTiPTi
0-25 19)6
1-84 5.8
1.01 11 lo
0.89 12,3
0.37 33.1
1.36 8.7
0.51 29.1
1.79 11.8
0.26 29.1
1.05 8.8
0.39 27.9
1.21 8.2
0.30 29.9
0.24 25.6
0.51 10.3
0.98 7.9
0.29 30.6
Oi'o 2M
0.88 8.1
0.28 26.9
0.77 7.0
0.82 10.6
gilt «*
i:R 279:!
?:S1 IM
8:8 8:1
BAG
ACT. 0.91 80.1 585.1 2.97 12.1
CALC. 0.91 66.0 525.7 2.17 11.0
33 0.02 0.0 81.3 0.02 109.1
31 0.31 0.0 980.9 0.00 9.0
35 0.28 0.0 532.9 0.00 16.6
36 0.21 0.0 192.7 0.12 18.0
37 0.17 0.0 119.1 0.18 21.1
38 0.15 0.0 111.3 2.27 20.0
39 0.20 0.0 578.0 5.56 15.3
2.97 73-7 527.0 2.13 13.6
2.95 72.6 175.1 1.69 11.8
1
12
5
3
0
0
0
.01
.15
.73
.37
.21
.11
.71
22
212
109
53
0
0
8
.5
.6
.2
.7
.5
.0
.1
68
811
172
131
378
118
506
.2
.6
.7
.1
.8
.3
.6
0
0
0
0
1
2
3
.01
.12
• 13
.25
.15
.03
.73
83
7
13
16
23
21
17
.1
.0
.1
.8
.3
.2
.0
2.15 79.2 495.7 0.69 I"-2
2.25 81.3 497.1 0.74 1«.0
0.03 0.0 105.5 0.02 81.1
0.52 0.0 1229.9 0.21 I-2
0.16 0.0 909.6 0.4', '-8
0.11 0.0 562.3 0.26 15-6
0.13 0.0 612.7 0.27 1«
0.13 0.0 108.5 0.77 2'-7
0.31 37.9 529.9 0.95 l5-«
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE (PER MINDTE FOR IDLE)
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON (MINUTES PER GALLON FOR IDLE)
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
E-4
-------
APPENDIX E.CONT'D
LISTING OF MODAL RESULTS OH INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES
DENVER
#»
10.
.x-—
1
2
i
I
I
9
to
11
12
8
!i
IS
19
20
21
22
11
I
S
8
11
BIG
ict.
CHI1
v*w».
33
34
36
38
39
gpa
f on
00?
HC
u»*
15
0.88
0.55
0.53
0.1B
2.15
0.25
0.67
0.12
1.51
0.15
0.96
0.11
0.06
0.2T
0.87
0.12
0.87
0.15
1.57
Q.14
0.58
0.63
o:<)9
0.72
0.13
0.51
0.93
1:11
0.46
0.45
0.05
0.66
0~.
•33
Om
•1>
0 14
Ul'J
0.06
mR
1975
CO
"w"i
o.o
2:5
W
16§:i
6U
°W
102.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
62.0
0.0
88.7
0.0
181.8
0.0
6.6
55.0
0.0
0.0
61.7
0.6
109/1
8:°
30.5
29.7
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
1.1
MAKE
FORD
C02
918-9
339.8
1018.2
613.7
521.9
215.6
511.2
235-9
!?!:§
591.1
237.0
662.8
212.6
258.0
632.1
213^
621.6
263.5
692.0
235.1
§8:?
111:1
610,8
238.1
769.6
566.0
£:i
170.1
126.0
89.9
1088.9
519.8
160.1
316.8
353.2
138.3
MODL
TRUC
NOX
1.65
0.23
i-ii
0.18
0.87
0.20
m
1:8
o:lo
III
§:i§
1.09
0.17
0.85
0.22
i.io
0.27
1.21
0.99
0.28
0.33
1.22
0.27-
1.10
1.06
8:8
0.89
0.71
O.OB
0.72
0.36
0.33
0.36
0.53
1.10
CID
302
MPG
2f:?
8.1
13.7
16.1
11.0
10.9
37.1
11.3
10.8
#:i
ZW
?H:8
10.8
11.5
11.6
33.6
3?:i
10.2
13.9
11.8
25.0
12.5
37.2
11.5
12.0
2l:t
17.1
18.7
98.6
8.1
16.1
19.3
25.6
25.1
20.1
VB1
ooi
HC
i.'il
1:11
1.98
1.60
1:8
1:8
2.51
3.11
2.61
2.16
0.81
2.97
3.11
1.53
2.75
1.79
2.93
2.85
3.12
1.95
2.61
1.23
1:1!
1:8
3.16
1.35
2.08
2.02
0.37
1.22
2.11
1.12
0.56
0.80
1.00
3 YEA
3 197!
CO
W
'8:i
5i:f
'H:J
3f:?
82.6
9.6
71.8
9.2
8.9
32.3
!:*
6H:i
126.1
10.1
82.1
39.6
9.1
12.0
51.5
10.1
76.0
79.1
10.8
13-5
39.0
37.6
3-9
11.1
19.2
12.8
9.9
1.9
23.1
R MAKE
5 FORD
C02
395:!
1018.2
635.5
511.1
212.3
586.5
213.9
530.8
219.0
613.5
263.2
689.6
229.8
301.6
756.5
711-1
257.8
652.9
303.0
276f:l
821.7
555.1
lll.'o
m-.i
»:«
219.6
109.3
502.2
150.2
108.9
1323.5
659.0
111.2
385.3
379.2
117. 2
MODL
TRUC
NOT
1:11
1.60
2.01
2,83
0.36
?:!f
5.60
0.81
1:11
1:11
0.21
0,73
5.00
0.31
1.60
0.39
oJi
3.08
0.93
0.30
5.92
0.87
i:8
0.96
0.35
3.27
2.59
0.12
0.81
0.10
0.25
0.60
1.53
1.26
CID
351
MPG
2l:l
J:3
11.0
31.7
11.1
32.9
15.1
33.2
11.1
30.7
10.9
35.2
%:1
10.1
32.7
11.6
27.6
9.6
30.5
9.2
11.2
31.7
20.1
12.3
29.7
10.3
12.6
is.-!
15.6
17.2
76.3
6.3
12.8
19-1
22.0
22.8
18.2
VEH YEAR MAKE MODL CID
009 1975 FORD TRUC 351
HC CO C02 NOX MPG
1.62 91.5 919-3 6.31 8.0
1.22 21.3 395.5 0.26 20.3
1.93 103.2 1021.2 1.62 7.1
2.89 56.7 606.8 2.81 12.6
2.20 35/1 535.7 3.83 11.8
1.55 1.7 251.1 0.15 33.3
3.10 131.3 670.1 1.11 10.0
1.06 T1.2 211.7 1.31 31-7
2.13 12.1 572-3 5.88 13.7
2.17 10.7 260.9 0.91 31.1
3.31 101.1 697.3 6.29 10.2
fl.37 13-5 273- t 1.00 28.8
3.31 80.9 712.0 7.22 10.1
2.17 11.3 216.1 0.91 32.8
0.88 16.1 301.2 0.19 26.7
3.58 90.9 698.8 0.36 10.1
3.58 67.9 750.6 6.79 10.2
1.15 6.5 269.2 0.39 31.3
3.15 76.1 651.6 5.15 11.3
1.77 10.3 318.6 0.10 26.1
3.90 151.0 801.9 5.93 8.1
2.75 11.2 289.7 1.09 27.7
1.20 103.5 797.6 1.25 9.1
2.31 11.1 602.5 6.17 13-2
3.29 11-3 215.2 1.12 32.5
1.16 28.5 123.8 0.32 18,8
3.11 63.8 658-3 6.98 11.5
2.17 15.2 292.5 0.95 27.6
3.72 83.7 713.0 3.13 10.0
2.69 92.3 632.7 5.85 11.3
3.25 13-0 251.7 1.18 31.1
T.12 26.3 116.6 0.27 19.2
2.51 13.0 519.6 3-88 11.9
2.16 13-8 171-0 3-12 16.1
0.50 8.6 98,8 0.06 77.9
5.89 95.1 1191.2 0.60 6.5
2.97 17.3 595.6 0.25 13-1
2.02 33.1 398.9 0.15 19.1
1.01 11.7 387-8 0.18 21.7
1.05 5.5 391-6 1.11 22.0
1.21 53.1 153-3 3.53 16.1
RESULTS m QHAMS PER MILE (PER MINUTE FOR IDLB)
BCOSOKT IS MLBS PER GALLON (MUTOTBS PER GALLON FOR IDLB)
CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
B-5
-------
APPENDIX E.CONT'D
LISTING OF MODAL RESULTS ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES
DENVER
MODE
NO.
1
2
^
I
I
9
10
11
12
I?
li
iZ
19
20
21
22
H
25
26
11
%
11
BAG
ACT.
CALC.
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
VEH
010
HC
1.31
0.29
0.74
0.42
0.43
0.41
0.80
0.36
0.31
0.23
0.42
0.29
0.37
0.22
0.10
0.24
0.40
0.20
8:11
0.51
0.21
0.31
0.32
0.26
0.15
0.34
0.23
0.34
0.35
0.24
0.15
0.32
0.29
0.03
0.57
0.26
0.17
0.17
0.09
0.17
YEAR MAKE
1975 CMC
CO C02
17.1 1088.7
0.0 372.4
0.0 1221.0
0.0 713.7
0.0 616.5
0.0 240.1
20.1 829.4
0.0 270.4
0.3 655.4
0.0 256.2
5.4 836.9
0.0 278.6
3.5 868.2
0.0 251.8
0.0 281.7
0.0 683.2
0.0 861.1
0.0 253.9
1.0 796.6
0.0 295.5
26.0 1009.9
0.0 285.4
U ®3
0.0 253.0
0.0 385.6
0.4 764.8
0.0 282.5
0,0 855.1
13.3 776.1
o.o 260.7
0.0 376.0
2.6 598.5
2.2 525.7
0.0 97.4
0.0 1152.2
0.0 754.4
0.0 501.1
0.0 413.0
0.0 434.0
0.0 520.3
MODL
TRUC
NOX
3.96
0.24
1.92
2.44
2.96
0.46
4.16
1.25
4-32
0.82
4.30
0.94
4.66
0.88
0.24
0.61
4.49
0.40
3.46
0.45
2.86
0.89
4.40
3.18
0.94
0.30
4.29
0.77
3.00
2.18
1.04
0.29
2.86
2.26
0.00
0.29
0.30
0.26
0.29
1.34
3.76
CID
350
MPG
7.9
23.8
7.3
12.4
14.4
36.8
10.3
32.7
13.5
34.5
10.5
31.7
10.1
35.2
m
10.3
34.9
30 '.0
8.4
31.0
il:3
11:8
11.6
31-3
10.4
11.1
11:1
14.7
16.7
91.1
7.7
11.8
17-7
21.5
20.4
17.0
VEH
011
HC
?:8
4.48
2.49
1.89
0.79
?:8
1.66
0.99
?:S
2.82
0.90
1.00
2.75
1:11
2:ft
\-M
?:«
1.08
1.40
2.16
1.05
2.72
2.79
1.09
1.37
1.56
1.67
0.34
3.77
2.03
1.21
1.04
1.10
0.86
YEAR
1975
CO
50.2
17.3
49.7
15.7
19.0
9.5
170.8
7.6
M:l
120.0
11.1
92.2
7.7
12.5
35.2
41.8
11.1
S:I
Z2\:l
24.6
42.9
1?:?
fcj
18.0
114.9
8.4
17.6
33.7
33.7
3.5
36.4
20.7
11.4
8.8
11.7
3.7
MAKE MODL
AMMO HORN
COS NOX
1004.1 12.48
248.2 1.31
1007.8 0.47
669.0 6.95
562.5 7.97
145.3 1.55
629.9 7.27
159.1 1.16
546.2 9.45
164.3 0.93
644.0 8.61
169.1 0.95
693.5 10.21
154.3 0.95
176.7 1.15
485.5 1.20
760.9 11.08
152.6 1.15
707.0 9.88
184.1 1.20
715.8 7.55
171.7 0.90
847.1 10.20
564.4 9.41
144.7 0.91
244.8 1.52
635.3 9.87
180.2 0.95
754.1 8.42
583.1 7.75
137.2 0.89
238.7 1.24
395.1 4.73
397.1 4.65
65.2 0.21
791.5 2.19
468.5 0.91
266.8 0.69
254.4 2.53
294.5 4.34
364.0 3.52
CID
258
MPG
8.1
31-7
8.1
12.7
14.8
54.5
9.8
50.9
14.8
48.4
10.5
46.6
10.5
52.4
44.5
16.1
10.6
51.4
11.2
42.5
8.2
46.6
9-9
13-9
55-1
32.1
12.6
44.5
11.2
11.5
S:l
19.6
19-5
123.6
10.3
17.5
30.8
32.7
28.1
23.8
VEH YEAR
012 1975
HC CO
2.44 120.3
0.41 13.1
l:ll in
1.61 66.3
0.18 5.8
4.22 301.5
0.21 5.1
1.26 61.7
0.34 6.5
2.95 186.1
0.56 10.5
2.66 123.6
0.39 7.6
0.16 5.6
0.68 22.5
2.61 130.5
0.46 11.3
2.70 98,4
0.61 14.3
4.78 347.0
0.74 13.1
2.06 117.6
2.02 101.0
0.45 10.3
0.28 11.0
2.49 126.3
0.51 11.8
1.80 99.2
2.99 205.5
0.63 11.4
0.41 16.1
1.35 71.2
1.42 72.0
0.01 0.0
0.21 0.0
0.14 0.0
0.13 0.0
0.09 0.0
0.06 0.9
0.13 10.9
MAKE
BOIC
C02
1192.9
328.9
'$:?
646.0
217.1
740.0
241.2
647.0
235.3
£:?
88:3
251.2
661.9
868.9
212.3
822.3
263.1
812.1
237-8
990.9
653.9
215.8
340.1
$:1
881.7
667.1
till
175.0
483-8
88.7
1070.0
695.2
450.6
341.5
375-8
452-2
MODL CID
cm 35*5
NOX HPO
3:8 |j
1:8 itt
§:8 S:?
3:31 357.1
3.11 11.9
6.39 3«.0
3.93 6.4
6.15 31.0
5.69 8.5
0.13 37.<
0.57 3U
0.89 12.7
1.03 8.2
0.32 38.3
5.75 9.0
0.17 30.9
3.18 6.1
5.72 31.0
1:8 ill
!:8 JM
3.86 9.*
6.65 33.1
2.58 8.5
2.82 8.9
0.76 37-1
0.86 25.6
1.60 15-0
1.80 I'-6
0.05 100-0
0.41 8.3
0.30 «••
0.21 19-7
0.31 26-0
0.10 23-5
1.59 I*-9
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE (PER MINUTE FOR IDLE)
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON (MINUTES PER GALLON FOR IDLE)
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
E-6
-------
APPENDIX E.CONT'D
LISTING OP MODAL RESULTS ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES
DENVER
IEAR HAKE HODL CID
W5 BOIC HIVI 455
HODS
10. JjjJ.
1 2.K
CO
C02 HOX MPG
s:i
8:)
§:Si
:5 '*:? 78
1.71 46.8 256.5 0.29 26.5
4.19 121.7 670.1 0.66 10.1
24 279:o
]] ?:S 2lti III:6* d:§i A'\
13 5.70291.2 943.9 3.72 6.3
If \M 24.1 265.1 0.53 29.1
15
16
17 4.26 174.5 995.8 3.80 6.9
« 2.31 34.6 243.9 0.29 29.0
19 4.29 184.8 919.4 3.26 7.3
20 2.58 45.7 292.7 0.31 23.8
21 11.38548.9 934.4 2.76 4.8
22 2.16 32.0 288.8 0.67 25.7
18:1
2:iS
»:8
:2 111:1 2:8 2i:S
Ul 1:1
11 \'\l ?!•? 254.0
K 2-32 So.5 347.5
29 1
19.7
BIG
I"! 2-8510"-1 553.0 1.70 12.2
Cttc- 3.01 110.8 569.7 1.87 11.8
I °-59 8-5 95.5 0.04 80.2
S'« "8.9 1172.7 0.52 6.7
3'« 39.3 591.8 0.26 13.4
2'« 62-2 486.0 0.27 „.„
, ^3 35.5 349.6 0.85 21.6
I '66 ».» "59.5 0.52 18.1
°'77 38.8 538.8 2.42 14>?
VEH YEAR MAKE MODL CID
014 W5 BUIC RBGA 350
HC CO C02 NOX MPG
_„________-_____-__- ----
1.64 43.9 289.2 0.44 24.4
161.2 1235.0 1.86 5.9
79.2 882.3 2.11 8.7
2.71 87.9 705.3 3.11 10.4
1.43 15.7 174.7 5.26 43.5
6.51 479.1 807.9 1.96 5.6
1.25 18.6 198.1 0.70 38.4
4.41 334.2 603.7 1.30 7.8
1.48 20.4 200.7 0.47 37.4
5.73 425.1 720.0 1.64 6.3
2.10 17.7 196.5 0.64 38.4
5.89 457.7 759.9 1.53 5.9
1.47 17.6 204.1 0.56 37.6
1.15 35-.S 206.2 0.35 33.4
3-13 88.2 565.7 0.53 12.4
4.03 189.0 914.6 2.74 7.2
1.48 23.4 187.3 0.23 38.8
4.04 220.5 855.6 2.20 7.3
1.63 31.5 229.6 0.30 31.2
7-34 557.2 864.5 2.08 5.0
1.68 24.3 209.5 0.52 35.1
4.16 150.2 1084.'
4.41 321.7 631.5
2.88
1.46
6.7
7.7
1.68 18.4 179.2 0.52 41.6
1.57 51.4 284. 2 0.31 24.0
3.81 223.5 766.2 2.33 7.9
1.59 23.0 216.9 0.47 34.4
.81 144.6 944.0 2.03 7.5
.3fl 361.7 720.4 2.05 6.8
16- 1§7-6 0-53 *6>9
274.3 0.40 24.8
1.
50.1
2.63 130.6 480.8 1.27 12.8
2.71 132.9 484.1 1.31 12.6
0.27 3.0 76.5 0.02 108.2
3.68 26.7 936.7 0.18 9.0
3.15 66.6 605.8 0.26 12.3
2.12 44.4 343.4 0.15 21.1
1.41 31.7 304.4 0.51 24.7
1.18 26.8 367.0 0.64 21.5
1.03 27.9 287.8 2.48 26.5
VEH YEAR MAKE MODL CID
015 1975 CADI ELDO 500
HC
CO
C02 NOX MPG
14.56 576.1 1226.1 2.04 4.1
3.29 49.6 352.1 1.07 20.2
11.61 233.4 1482.2 3.69 4.]
7.32 245.2 901.4 2.40 6.i
6.74 301.4 732.0 1.94 7.2
1.68 30.1 264.5 0.79 28.0
8.99 514.2 848.9 2.01 5.3
2.41 65.5 281.3 0.78 22.6
6.81 368.4 696.1 1.38 6.8
3.48 62.6 267.8 0.60 23.5
10.18 608.0 819.4 1.32 1.9
4.16 66.5 275.7 0.66 22.6
10.81 619.9 866.7 1.30 4.]
3.10 64.9 261.3 0.60 23-1
>.24 37.6 264.0 1.00 26.9
5.76 117.8 655.7 1.29 10.3
12.22 553-9 945.5 1.66 4.8
2.79 38.0 249.5 0.65 27.9
).60 471.0 921.2
J.73 48-2 285-(
•s.i
1.88 5.2
0.66 23.£
1.69 4.-
0.63 22.:
11.J
7.1
454.5 1095.6
424.4 735.E
2.34
1.39
4.8
6.2
5.15 61.4
5.39 60.2
251.0 0.64 24.8
358.2 1.55 19.1
10.04 510.8 795.5 1.28 5.4
3.86 69.1 283.1 0.62 22.0
1:1
III
6.29 248.6 539.8 1.11 9-3
6.44 252.8 551.2 1.22 9-2
0.83 15.9 79.7 0.01 82.7
11.31 202.8 950.7 0.08 6.8
5.86 95.4 509.9 0.08 13-1
4.20 65.7 498.1 0.64 14.4
2.37 29.4 425.6 2.12 18.5
2.38 57.8 468.9 1.27 15.6
8.06 241.3 466.3 1.25 10.2
RESULTS M GRAMS PER MILE (PER MINUTE FOR IDLE)
ECONOMY IN MILES'PBH GALLON (MINUTES PER GALLON FOR IDLE)
BCOHOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
K-7
-------
APPENDIX E.COMT'D
LISTING OF MODAL RESULTS ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES
DENVER
MODE
NO.
"T
2
I
I
I
9
10
11
12
H
15
17
19
20
21
22
11
26
11
29
30
11
BAG
ACT.
CALC.
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
VEH YEAR
016 1975
HC CO
3.46 125.0
0.26 7.9
3.39 108.6
1.05 30.9
0.55 11- 1
0.30 7.4
1.14 65.4
0.24 4.9
0.89, 35.7
0.18 6.9
1.78 97.5
0.23 9.2
1.97 99.1
0.23 9.5
0.06 1.2
0.19 0.0
2.51 111.6
0.34 10.8
1.61 67.4
0.43 16.1
2.72 112.5
0.37 11-3
2.42 82.9
0.88 40.6
0.23 9.4
0.11 3.6
1.72 78.5
0.30 11.8
2.20 71.6
1.12 67.6
0.23 8.9
0.15 5.3
0.88 36.8
0.89 36.2
0.44 10.9
4.66 139.5
1.68 42.8
0.08 0.0
0.05 0.0
0.56 8.4
0.32 11.6
MAKE
CHEV
C02
625.1
211.2
618.2
458.9
344.2
138.8
340.0
119.9
S:3
88:?
407.7
137.4
144.8
146.8
?P:I
112.5
161.4
375.2
152.1
519.0
360.7
131.5
233.4
377.4
152.1
491.2
369.2
130.4
209.6
276.0
270.5
26.9
667.6
401.3
401.2
187.3
200.6
254.9
MODL
VEGA
NOX
2.16
0.95
2.63
1.90
2.59
0.98
1.90
1.46
»
!:«
2.96
1.16
0.75
1.73
2.21
0.96
2.32
1.09
2.07
1.43
3.15
3-03
1.60
1.24
2.84
1.55
1:18
tti
2.19
2.14
0.01
2.40
0.42
1.04
0.81
2.00
3.86
CID
140
MPG
10.7
39.6
l):l
III
19.9
56.1
21.7
59.7
16.8
53-9
15.6
58.0
60.4
19.8
4h Ji
62 '.2
17.0
47.2
15.8
51.9
12.9
20.8
60.4
37.1
^•s
51.8
14.5
18.5
61.2
40.6
26.4
26.9
195.4
9.8
18.7
22.1
47.4
41.2
32.4
VEH YEAR
017 1975
HC CO
3.16 119.6
6.35 6.2
2.81 43.9
0.87 12.8
1.37 52.2
0.58 0.4
3.34 215.3
0.09 0.0
1.55 82.2
m *w
2.80 164.2
0.26 3.1
0.17 3.8
2.55 45.2
2.39 97-2
0.22 4.7
2,07 87.6
0.35 7.7
S^ 26J:1
\:ll iot.1
0.25 2.8
0.26 7.4
2,02 91.4
0.42 7.4
1.03 24.9
2.85 194.0
S:8 i!:»
1.05 53-3
1.10 50.3
0.01 0.0
0.14 0.0
0.13 0.0
0.27 0.2
0.16 0.1
0.04 0.0
0.02 0.0
MAKE
CHEV
C02
892.2
323.9
956.8
660.0
8?:8
IS:?
536.2
220.4
597.1
238.4
658.0
211.4
238.9
612.5
724.7
211.0
669.6
246.7
682.7
245.6
833.9
541.5
206.1
327.9
632.1
2^1.4
770.3
511.1
215.0
319.8
427.2
432.7
80.3
984.9
484.5
347.6
281.8
344.1
410.2
MODL
NOVA
NOX
Tsi"
1.02
4.15
2.55
Ml
1.89
1.50
3-05
1.07
2.64
1.23
3.63
1.10
1.11
0.78
4.14
0.54
3.85
0.50
2-3.9
1.08
!:I1
1.26
1.51
\:M
?:«
1.47
0.99
2.42
2.32
0.31
1.84
0.84
0.34
1.00
0.83
3-13
CID
250
MPG
2!:5
8.6
13.0
&81
379:73
13.2
39.4
9.6
36.0
9.6
40.9
36.2
12.8
10.0
40.5
10.9
34.1
8.0
34.9
i!:I
8:?
m
10.9
10.8
40.2
25.9
17.3
17.2
110.4
9.0
18.3
25.4
31.4
25.8
21.6
VEH YEAR
018 1975
1:11 '8:1 '
\:& 11:1
2.28 131.6
0.59 16.4
3.69 272.4
0.42 13.5
1.87 148.5
0.31 12.3
3.56 278.8
5.44 14.7
3.38 261.1
0.43 13.8
0.81 22.6
0.43 16.1
2.55 185.5
0.43 15.1
2.17 132.5
0.67 20.2
4.37 357.0
0.42 14.0
0.98 63.1
2.68 185.2
0.41 14. 7
1.03 31.2
2.64 185.9
0.40 14.7
1.01 71.3
3-35 251.3
0.48 17.6
0.90 27.4
1.36 86.1
1.43 88.2
0.09 1.2
0.13 o.o
0.60 4.6
1.30 12.1
1.40 36.7
0.08 0.6
0.11 7.2
MAKE
CHEV
'$:!
'?§!:?
586.6
201.8
675.2
237.7
584.7
234.3
665.6
241.8
728,4
217.7
228.6
620.1
809.1
222.8
785.6
256.7
782.8
247.5
993-1
589.1
212.6
316.6
675.6
246.0
888.3
622.0
206.4
458.1
466.8
78.8
964.5
575.8
374.5
292.8
411.6
486.6
HODL en,
MONT 5~5Q
HOX H?C
olFS
?:8 iK
Ml y-.}
1 -91 8.0
0.62 34.1
1.57 10.8
0.52 31.9
1.52 8.0
0-51 33.3
1.96 7.7
0.57 36.9
0.65 33.3
1.12 13.7
2.21 8.0
0.43 35.8
2.1)2 8.9
0.45 30.5
1.69 6.5
0.53 32.8
2.97 8.1
1.55 10.0
8:8 ft
'0:8 £i
2-1* I1?
1.61 8.6
0.64 37-1
0.91 »•»
1.22 1»-»
1.33 1«-4
0.06 109-5
1.36 «'2
0.23 15-2
0.29 22.3
0.72 25-0
1.19 21-5
2.53 tf'7
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE (PER MUTOTE FOR IDLE)
FUEL BCONOMX IH MILES PER GALLON (MINUTES PER GALLON FOB IDLE)
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBON TO HTOROGEN RATIO
E-8
-------
APPENDIX E.CONT'D
LISTING OP MODAL RESULTS ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES
DENVER
VEH IBM MAKE MODL CID
55 1575 ciiiv CAPR 350
VEH YEAR MAKE MODL CID
020 1975 CHEV IMPA 350
VEH YEAR MAKE MODL CID
021 1975 CHEV STAW 400
NODE
DO.
«-— •
1
2
\
I
I
9
10
11
12
11
15
16
'I
li
19
20
21
22
11
3
3
3
11
BIG
*CI.
Clip
wilfl*.
33
n
Jl
35
36
37
38
39
HC CO C02
1.0" 31"
1% $3 TO
a 'as sw
H? 3fcl 191
1 85 182.7 603.0
til? 26.7 242.9
6.35 367.7 698.8
l!53 26.9 260.8
6.28341.5 772.9
1.33 27.8 218.5
1.85 51.8 232.8
3.7* 47.8 686.1
5.68246.8 847.0
1.75 37.6 226.5
6.32 333.2 746.3
1.30 24.3 280.9
7.48 455.0 821.0
1.29 28.9 254.4
3.97 166.2 1029.5
'.83 254.3 614.5
Mg 31.8 217.9
1.51 34.3 355.0
'•83 2*4.9 697.2
1.60 28.9 265.0
'•90 171.3 897.1
5.75 326.1 650.9
1.62 35.9 217 4
US Jo!? 349:0
3-0» 131.4 466.7
3-15131.5 480.2
0.00 o.O 89.8
°-00 0.0 1120.5
8-te 22.9 663.3
2<18 23.5 438.6
t IM ku _
z-03 44.5 333.0
0 Oft *tb
"•98 24.1 403.4
2-Ol 52.8 450.9
NOX
2.64
0.19
l:«
1.54
0.21
1.72
0.72
2.03
0.49
1.27
0.52
1.67
0.47
0.11
0.31
1 94
o!i8
1.07
0.20
1.23
0.45
2.25
1.24
0.54
0.25
1.76
0.56
1.88
1.20
0.60
0.29
1.26
1.14
0.19
1.27
0.32
0.34
0.80
0.94
2.34
MPG
21.1
1:1
9-7
33.0
2l:l
9.8
30.8
aH
6.7
33-3
27.7
11.5
7.1
30.5
6.Q
27.5
5.7
29.2
1:1
l?:i6
M
77:i
31.8
22.1
13-0
12.7
98.8
7.9
12.6
18.4
21.7
20.0
16.4
HC CO
3.12 217.2
0.90 33.9
1.50 135.8
2.37 109-9
§:jj? Ti.l
?:I2 3Si:l
2.62 214.8
0.77 30.4
4.11 379.4
1.14 37.7
3.98 349.4
6.86 32.4
0.87 34.0
1.22 60.0
4.26 28$*7
0.7^ 23»6
3.25 238.7
0.8? 31.9
4.96 485.1
0.97 37.7
1.84 136.6
3.50 289.1
1.16 38.8
1.12 41.6
?:R ^:l
3.56 191.7
4.00 351.1
1.26 38.3
0.90 28.5
2.03 141.6
2.07 139.5
0.00 0.0
0.10 0.0
0.11 0.0
0.07 0.0
1.28 35.9
0-17 9.7
0.86 45.0
C02
1168.4
364.4
1fI2:l
I%:1
714.9
258.5$
591-3
261.4
714.5
270.7
783.0
245.8
272.7
707.4
828.5
247.0
782.1
295.0
nu
1035.0
597.3
229.2
3§3.1
698.2
276.4
866.9
645.5
m
484.9
492.1
98.4
1212.0
723.9
468.2
367.0
416.3
482.5
NOX
2.78
0.35
0.81
1.44
1.53
0.30
1.08
0.91
J:Zi
J:H
1.63
0.71
0.35
0.49
1.94
0.33
1.69
0.32
0:°6§
2.29
1.02
0.63
0.43
1.57
0.65
2.08
1.07
0.70
0.45
1.10
1.16
0.25
1.80
0.49
0.37
0.19
0.54
2.81
MPG
2K1
\:l
11.0
30.4
M
a*:!
2l:l
6.6
29.6
27.0
11.0
6.9
31.0
7.6
25.5
5.5
25.9
w
?§:§
afc!
7.5
7.3
30.1
20.9
12.1
12.4
90.2
7.3
12.3
18.9
20.8
20.5
16.0
HC CO
4.26 368.2
0.19 0.0
0.84 14.4
0.59 7.5
1.59 147.7
0.16 1/1
5.82 910.2
0.28 1.7
4.52 385.2
0.26 1.0
10.71 754.5
0.38 1.3
10.32 729.2
0.24 0.9
0.10 0.0
0.20 0.0
4.35 390.1
0.19 1.4
4.20 392.9
0.25 1.7
10.13 781.5
0.36 1.3
0.73 37.2
6.17 453.9
0.27 0.9
0.15 0.0
6.21 494.2
0.22 1.3
0.60 29.7
7.57 582.6
0.31 1.8
0.19 2.6
2.47 179.9
2.66 182.8
0.01 0.0
0.35 0.0
0.28 0.0
0.26 0.3
0.13 0.0
0.16 0.1
0.11 0.4
C02
1540.6
377.3
1884.7
1151.6
888.3
284.7
929.9
331.1
686.9
286.3
803.9
293.1
853-0
273-5
283.0
630.0
1064.4
273.0
978.3
305.2
941.4
281.5
1451.8
741.0
280.0
374.3
838.1
289.9
Wd
\IU
629.7
607.4
77-1
908.6
531.1
522.5
497.4
528.6
694.0
NOX
2.15
0.33
1:1]
l-M
l:?l
1.16
0.75
0.98
0.60
0.88
0.65
8:22
1.62
0.37
1.27
1.12
0.62
2.64
0.98
0.71
0.39
1.13
0.62
2.59
0.85
0.68
0.43
1.11
1.09
0.08
0.71
0.50
0.80
0.93
1.32
3.05
MPG
4.2
23-5
4.6
7.6
7.9
30.9
z\:l
6.8
30.7
4.4
30.0
4.4
32.2
«:?
5.2
32.2
2i:l
4.0
31.2
u
31.4
23.7
5.4
30.3
6.3
5.2
31.6
25.3
9.6
9.8
115.0
9.8
16.7
16.9
17.8
16.8
12.8
(PER MINUTE FOR IDLE)
p(JE -— ~—~- (MINUTES PER GALLON FOR IDLE)
ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
B-9
-------
APPENDIX E.CONT'D
LISTING OF MODAL RESULTS ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES
DENVER
NODE
NO.
1
2
2
1
I
9
10
11
12
H
II
K
19
20
21
22
12
il
%
29
30
32
BAG
ACT.
CALC.
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
VEH YEAR
022 1975
HC CO
3.05 145.3
0.32 5.3
0.59 0.0
0.62 36.7
0.54 31-5
0.12 1.2
4.33 266.5
0.43 13.0
0.98 46.4
0.17 5.5
4.18 238.0
0.76 10.5
B:27 10!5
0.06 0.0
0.29 0.0
3.51 172.5
0.24 2.8
2.57 140.8
0.37 1.8
8:8^:8
1:R 11:1
0.42 12.2
0.19 0.0
2.58 119.5
0.25 9.2
0.90 47.8
3.67 225.4
0.74 14.3
0.18 0.0
1.25 65.0
1.30 65.4
0.01 0.0
0.32 0.0
0.21 0.0
0.22 0.0
0.22 0.0
0.07 0.9
1.23 75.0
HAKE 1
CHHY 1
C02
1242.3
449.8
1517.2
873.6
716.0
308.2
794.4
351.2
737.2
317.9
810.8
342.3
871.5
314.3
345.7
772.1
917.2
323.9
861.6
377.4
921.6
355.2
1123.2
755.3
307.3
489.3
840.0
358.1
1?25?:2
m
615.1
597.8
109.2
1346.6
691.4
479.1
451.0
509.8
514.0
HODL i
NEHP '
NOX
7.31
0.64
3.52
2.72
3.61
0.75
Hi1
6.82
0.89
5.25
1.15
5.94
1.05
0.63
0.86
6.54
0.69
5.40
0.78
tt?
ttl
1.18
0.81
7.63
1.06
5.51
3.52
1.21
0.69
3.21
3.28
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.03
0.82
1.40
3.17
CID
1*00
MPG
6.0
19.3
5.8
9.5
ll:l
7.2
23-8
10.9
27.1
*l:t
*tt
25.7
11.5
7.4
27.0
8.1
23.3
5.9
23.6
iZ:i
8:1
8.6
23.8
7.8
8.2
27.0
19.0
12.3
12.6
81.2
6.6
12.8
18.5
19.6
17.4
14.0
VEH YEAR MAKE MODL
023 1975 DODG CORO
HC CO C02 NOX
3.21 50.5 1172.0 11.08
1.61 34.9 306.5 0.82
5.36 124.2 1193-3 2.55
1.52 25.2 816.2 3.96
0.69 2.8 705.6 8.64
0.42 5.1 231.7 1.62
1.28 20.2 872.5 9.15
0.13 1.4 313.4 2.88
0.26 0.0 696.4 10.69
1.10 13-3 261.7 2.26
1.03 12.4 884.3 11.78
1.18 16.3 265.3 2.29
0.76 12.0 919.7 10.94
0.82 7.9 252.4 2.43
1.07 22.5 222.7 0.89
4.12 121.1 548.6 1.47
1.17 17.6 938.5 10.84
0.64 15.2 216.1 1.02
0.91 13.1 871.6 8.68
0.77 19.9 265.8 1.57
1.59 32.2 997.5 10.39
1.08 16.3 269.6 2.29
2.37 49.9 1018.0 7.73
0.35 0.7 734.3 12.11
0.57 6.6 257.4 2.46
1.18 28.9 328.6 1.00
0.6J 7.8 812.2 11.44
0.94 15.0 274.3 2.76
1.69 33.7 930.2 5.67
0.46 2.7 795.1 7.91
0.30 4.1 264.4 2.98
1.10 31. $ 311.7 1.12
0.84 15.5 548.7 5.00
0.85 14.7 546.9 5.84
0.59 15.2 72.5 0.00
6.91 170.5 891.1 0.00
3.50 87.7 458.9 0.00
2.41 57.6 357.7 0.00
0.99 4.2 347.8 2.85
0.13 0.0 381.3 3-86
0.11 0.2 509.0 7.23
CID
318
MPG
7.0
24.2
6.3
10.3
31:1
28:?
12.7
31.0
9.8
30.1
9.4
33.2
m
9.2
36.7
9.9
29.6
8.4
29.7
8.0
12.1
32.9
23.5
10.7
29.5
9.0
11.1
32.6
54.3
15.4
15.5
90.3
7.5
14.6
19.5
24.8
23.2
17.4
VEl
021
HC
!i:tt
8.71
4.17
2.82
1.04
3-75
1.09
2.61
3.54
4.26
3.80
3.90
2.71
2.16
4.77
4.66
3.63
4.21
4.47
4.80
4.09
5.65
2.82
2.34
3.60
3:8
3:3!
1.67
4.85
3.34
3.38
0.84
9.64
3-52
2.56
1.53
0.30
1.81
I YEAR
I 1975
CO
247.8
48.5
196.9
121.0
70.3
12.?
136.4
23-5
70.9
26.9
'8:1
131.8
26.9
36.0
142.5
125.1
17.0
155.2
22.6
192.7
32.8
148.1
84.1
27.2
53.7
106-3
30.6
140.9
166.3
27.6
61.6
70.7
73-7
20.3
229.9
68.4
61.6
20.7
7.2
71.6
MAKE
DODG
C02
698.3
176.8
707.4
496.6
446.2
141.9
536.5
163.9
473.6
147.6
583.2
156.6
600.6
142.9
128.4
293.9
607.3
132.8
529.6
158.9
626.8
159.5
641.0
494.3
139.4
174.9
541.0
157.1
S63.6
490.1
13M
156.6
345.3
340.9
30.7
388.5
K46.1
280.0
227.4
287.5
311-2
MODL
DAW
NOX
m
3:«
1%
5.36
1.33
5.05
0.87
til
6.10
0.83
0.42
0.44
8:8
l:ll
6.44
0.90
3.17
5.15
0.88
0.61
5-82
0.87
2.70
3.19
0.91
0.45
2.70
2.65
0.00
0.10
0.32
0.20
1.15
0.41
2.62
CID
225
HPO
~?1
33.5
i!:l
53-:?
8:1
ft!
10.9
41.2
11
8:1
10.8
51.9
11.3
42.5
9.4
39.6
10.0
14.0
g.1
fti
n.j
11.6
47.2
33.0
19-0
19-0
136-1
11.4
15.7
23-1
33-5
e
29-'
__ If
20.7
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE (PER MINUTE FOR IDLE)
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON (MINUTES PER GALLON FOR IDLE)
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
E-10
-------
APPENDIX E.CONT'D
LISTING OF MODAL RESULTS ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES
DENVER
HOW
no.
"\
I
I
I
,!
11
12
ii
11
11
19
20
21
22
11
3
is
29
30
11
BIG
tcr.
ma YEAR
V50 A*"1"
025 1975
HC 00__
j:§i 9i;5
0.57 22.0
0.58 17.2
1.07 15.2
0.02 0.7
0.39 36.0
0.13 9.2
0.27 24.0
0.00 0.6
2.07 49.2
0.09 5.2
3-35 70.9
0.06 2.1
0.03 1.1
0.08 3.2
5.94 81.0
0.09 0.8
2.48 46.8
0.09 1.0
4.36 67.9
0.24 19.1
1.03 112.6
0.68 38.2
0.05 3 ?
o.oi f:i
2-31 74.7
o.iw 0:7
1.26 95.9
0.84 ll.o
0.09 7.5
0-00 1.5
0-92 34.1
MAKE
FORD
C02
"iST
253.1
986.9
543-4
477.6
165.0
415.6
224.6
477.7
182.1
478.9
202.9
510.9
183.9
172.5
479.1
581.5
164.0
560.6
185.5
468.0
204.2
715.5
459.4
193-3
230.6
502.9
198.2
680.4
450.9
flM
VIS. 1
MODL
MUST
NOX
""T5"
0.29
0.72
1.82
1.13
0.59
8:8
l:l\
0.83
0.41
0.97
0.45
0.21
0.30
1.10
0.36
1 .03
0.40
0.81
0.28
1.06
0.96
0.49
0.28
S:U
Ul
1%
ft fn
CID
140
MPG
"io7i
34.6
8.7
15.5
17.6
53-4
18.7
37.1
17.2
46.5
&8
IW
«:!
5I:1
M
15.1
37.8
9.8
17.0
44.7
38.1
14.1
44.5
10.6
17.1
43.1
41.5
in *r
VEH YEAR MAKE
026 1975 FORD
HC CO C02
i"76~i58.6 Tioi.i
0.44 9.5 386.1
3.52 134.3 1298.4
1.71 40.5 843.7
1.48 46.1 727.6
0.96 6.8 280.5
3.09 156.2 814.0
1.62 5.9 288.0
1.13 42.7 733.0
1.29 5.0 287.9
1.94 107.0 909.6
1.98 5.5 292.0
1.81 93.9 963.4
1.04 5.2 292.6
0.24 8.1 305.4
1.36 29.7 692.0
2.36 111.1 967.3
0.97 6.0 269.1
1 .97 93.7 872.6
1.11 7.0 318.6
3.19 172.8 1004.4
1.33 6.0 311.9
2.73 89.7 1097.4
1.35 67.5 769.0
1.46 5.5 272.7
0.69 9.0 381.6
1.59 72.2 849.8
1.06 6.8 311.9
2.46 94.6 974.6
1.96 106.0 797.0
1.52 6.5 281.1
0.39 12.3 392.7
MODL
TORI
NOX
"OS"
0.41
III
4.20
0.45
6.58
1.17
5.47
0.83
g:8
6.61
0.86
0.26
0.47
2:U
3.90
6.37
7.25
0.92
5.13
4.55
0.87
0.38
5.87
0.75
3-78
5.31
1.07
0.32
CID
351
MPG
"To
22.1
5.8
9.7
11.0
30.2
8.3
29.4
11.0
29.6
8.2
28.9
7.9
29.2
27.8
11.9
7.7
31-5
8.6
26.6
6.9
27.3
7.1
10.1
31.0
22.3
27^
7.8
9.2
30.0
21.5
VE
02
HC
oT 69
0.08
0.49
0.41
0.32
0.06
2.67
0.12
1.17
0.06
3:U
1.53
0.05
0.10
0.27
Ml
1.44
0.12
3.24
0.11
0.37
1.42
0.06
0.13
0.39
0.05
0.31
1.78
0.08
0.14
A y -
:H YEAR
7 1975
CO
"~iiT
0.3
2.2
0.3
2o.1
144.6
0.4
112.1
0.1
170.9
0.2
127.3
0.1
0.2
0.6
30.4
0.2
101.7
0.8
193.0
0.6
0.4
87.5
0.1
0.3
'Z:S
0.3
118.1
0.1
0.3
MAKE
FORD
C02
304:7
1249.6
835.1
696.2
217.2
629.6
289.2
562-3
248.9
689.3
269.0
818.3
247.0
248.4
580.2
1025.4
219.9
789.4
290.9
796.7
278.0
1150.1
640.2
250.9
326.8
836.9
268.6
"&\
246.0
321.5
MODL
GRAN
NOX
0^5
1.92
1.62
2.81
0.69
2.75
0.65
2.64
0.49
l:l\
ffl
0.55
0.35
2.71
0.61
2.52
0.65
2.97
0.51
3.10
2.73
0.46
0.63
2.52
0.47
2.07
1.90
0.48
0.72
4 Ct
CID
250
MPG
29^
io:e
Itt
10-3
30.6
12.0
35.6
9.2
32.9
8.7
35.9
35.6
15.3
8.3
40.3
9-3
30.3
8.0
31-8
7.7
11.3
m
9.7
33.0
8.6
10.8
36.0
27.5
«c ft
33
3<
35
36
37
38
39
L95 35.7 373.6 0.72 20.5
0.01
°-° 49.6 0.01 178.6
19 0.0 636.1 0.17 13.9
•« 0.0 632.7 0.29 14.0
10 0.0 425.4 0.21 20.8
12 »-0 291.1 0.66 30.4
" °-0 260.7 1.61 34.0
02 °'5 390.2 1.36 22.7
1.23 41.1 579.1 3.05 13-7
1.26 41.2 580.7 2.98 13-7
0.26 3.9 94.6 0.08 87.4
2.94 35.7 1172.7 0.79 7.2
0.93 12.9 764.1 0.55 11.3
0.66 5.8 507.6 0.42 17.1
0.43 10.8 408.3 0.78 20.8
0.41 10.9 433.6 1.04 19.6
0.17 12.9 545.0 3.17 15.7
0.61 35.5 502.1 1.53 15.9
0.64 35.8 516.1 1.61 15.5
0.04 0.0 74.9 0.06 118.4
0.48 0.0 861.2 0.63 10.3
0.29 0.0 630.4 0.70 14.1
0.17 0.0 413.0 0.61 21.5
0.18 0.0 312.8 1.88 28.3
0.16 0.0 350.8 1.00 25.3
0.05 0.0 506.8 1.48 17-5
^ SSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE (PER MINUTE FOR IDLE)
BCOHOMI IN MILES'PER GALLON (MINUTES PER GALLON FOR IDLE)
CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
E-ll
-------
APPENDIX E.CONT'D
LISTING OF MODAL RESULTS ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES
DENVER
MODE
NO.
1
2
?
I
I
1*
11
12
H
11
13
19
20
21
22
12
25
26
11
29
30
32
BAG
ACT.
CALC.
33
31
35
36
37
38
39
VEH YEAR
028 1975
HC CO
7.61 287.6
2.76 66.9
9.25 218.0
1.18 115.3
2.98 75.6
2.00 32.6
6.60 120.3
2.21 32.0
\:\i '&?
l:?l IS:?
5.01 275.9
2.73 31-3
2.25 67.2
5.61 159.2
1.95 208.7
2.19 13.9
1.71 221.8
2.81 50.2
7.57 183-0
3.56 16.0
6.52 237.1
1.11 205.0
3.19 33.0
2.78 71.9
1.61 209.0
3.36 18.7
5.57 178.8
5.35 299.5
3.15 32.1
i.oo 103.3
3-52 127.1
3.59 126.9
0.75 16.3
5.20 83.3
1.17 17.0
1-05 11.7
0.52 7.1
0.51 13.0
2.02 5.2
MAKE
FORD
C02
'38:8
1i?I:3
!3:§
802.0
260.8
650.8
251.1
770.0
269.0
820.1
235.6
252.3
677.2
861.5
218.6
757.2
287.3
857.2
253-3
950.8
653-1
225.1
382.1
737.1
260.3
859.5
678. 7
228.3
335. T
505.2
509.1
91.9
1358.9
806.1
520.7
112.0
119.1
161.2
MODL
LTD
NOX
3.10
0.28
1.82
1.95
3.05
0.31
2.28
0.83
3o:i§
g:§g
2.11
0.82
0.31
0.61
2.71
0.30
1.91
0.29
2.17
0.63
2.18
1.98
0.80
0.11
2.11
0.67
1.95
1.90
0.78
0.38
1.12
1.51
0.06
0.82
0.51
0.36
0.72
0.92
3.69
CID
351
MP
18
i
10
30
6
27
2$
2l
35
21
9
27
7
23
26
6
9
8
8
25
7
30
17
12
12
72
5
10
16
20
18
18
G
.5
J
.6
.1
.0
.9
.5
.2
.2
.0
:l
:3
.9
.7
.1
.3
.6
.0
:!
.2
:l
:l
.1
.3
.2
.9
.6
.1
.9
.8
.5
VEH
029
HC
2.11
0.58
?:H
oieo
2.93
1.01
0.78
0.71
1.21
1.21
1.15
0.65
0.25
1.39
1.61
0.32
1.38
0.10
§:ft
1.95
0.88
glH
0.98
0.57
1.55
1.55
0.71
0.13
0.86
0.88
0.27
2.88
1.11
0.96
0.31
0.23
0.25
YEAR
1975
CO
71.3
15.8
160.0
67.9
11.1
8.8
202.9
10.2
7i:?
138:1
13i:?
3f:I
82.2
7.9
69.5
10.0
217.1
10.1
102.2
76.3
8.1
17.1
1:1
81.2
169.8
8.2
16.9
53.1
51.0
3.2
18.9
13.6
10.5
11.1
11.9
17.1
MAKE
FORD
C02
1366.2
191.3
1155.9
879.3
772.3
322.8
853.6
332.7
lltt
l%:\
1007.1
333.6
375.8
911.5
1031.8
310.1
960.1
103.1
1088.8
367.5
1197.1
812.3
310.6
512.1
927.0
372.3
1088.1
875.7
311.1
509.0
632.1
615.1
122.2
1150.1
725.1
198.0
135.7
509.3
551.2
MODL
LTD
NOX
7.01
0.70
1.82
2.21
3:8
2.22
1.18
2.95
0.80
Ul
1$
0.11
1.31
1.75
0.37
1.03
0.11
2.51
0.86
2.80
2.85
2:8
in
1.86
2.03
0.76
0.57
1.92
1.98
0.16
1.68
0.75
0.16
0.66
0.57
2.81
CID
100
MPG
6.0
17.0
S.2
8.9
11:1
25:i
2§:2
7.1
23.9
7.2
25.5
22.7
8.9
7.6
25.1
8.3
21.1
6.0
23.0
6.5
9.2
M:l
£1
?:?
S:i
12.3
12.2
69.3
6.0
11.8
17.1
19.5
16.6
15.3
VEH YEAR MAKE MODL CID
030 1975 MERC HAR$ (£
__ HC co C02 NOX HPG
1:?2 2lll 'ggfi sail
1:8 %§ '8:1 ?:J? j:;
l:o-o B:f ffl:5 §:!! &
1:8 3I3:I &3 ?:8 25J
2.67 93.9 757.3 3.75 97
2.75 25.1 290.5 5.70 26.3
3.98 188.2 931.8 1.16 7.1
3.77 26.1 303.7 0.82 2M
1.21 185-3 971.1 1.52 6.9
3.03 23.7 272.7 0.76 27.8
1.79 71.5 279.2 0.27 22.3
3.86 96.0 751.7 0.50 9.7
1.11 178.0 1027.6 3.18 6.7
2.51 18.5 270.9 0.25 25.0
3.89 156.7 919.1 3-98 7.3
3.15 51.1 320.5 0.25 21.<
5.35 317.0 1071.0 3-96 5.6
3.18 26.1 300.1 0.67 25.2
1.87 161.2 1116.5 2.95 6.3
3.25 111.2 781.9 3-11 8.8
?:8 11:1 i§:8 8:B S:!
1:TJ 'S:? 5S:1 III ti
1:11 111:1 1§2l:I 1:8 H
Wl %* 18:1 8:8 iW
3.01 97.5 581.5 2-0' "•'
3.05 97.3 590.7 2.03 »-8
0.57 16.3 93.9 0.05 73-'
6.63 160.1 1181.7 0.61 6.1
3.01 59.2 616.5 0.30 12-3
1.91 31.5 133.8 0.2i 1»-1
1.21 32.7 161-2 0.51 ".'
1.59 13.6 500.2 0.55 «•«
1.80 19.5 506.8 3-69 «••
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE (PER MINUTE FOR IDLE)
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON (MINUTES PER GALLON FOR IDLE)
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
E-12
-------
VEH IBM HAKE «0_PL C1_D
W m5 MERC MONO 351
APPENDIX E.CONT'D
i; OF MODAL RESULTS ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES
DENVER
VEH YEAR HAKE HODL CID
032 1975 OLDS DELT 350
HJDE HC co C02 NOX MPO HC CO C02 NOX
??; :«TTiS"i"i"5o 67s 7^63" 379'i" i6io. o'TeS"
6.1
,« i»n * 12W 3 081 6.1
\ H2 88:? 79l:i I-" 9.5
L
\
59 2 693.8 2.58 11.2
n:o 275.5 0.27 29.6
«1 6 7320 1.82
M'.l s
. 7.0
lilO 25.1
g 090 55.6 691.6 2.64 11.4
,0 UO 10.3 292.5 0.63 28.3
ffl
II
\l ?:R1k« 282:7 o.
IS 0.54 12.2 311.2 0.31 26.7
15 1.79 47.7 700.3 0.63 11.4
17 1.65 99.9 948.9 3.38 8.0
14 1.29 11.9 292.2 0.26 28.2
19 1.60 79.0 863.2 3.24 8.9
20 1.11 13.3 345.2 0.26 24.0
21 4.11 349.4 901.2 2.24 6.1
22 1.59 12.3 §l6.7 0.75 25.9
8
'8:1
8 i:8 1?:? $13 8:11 III
1:1
6«0
Wt- '-37 63.8 555.9 1.67 13.4
<«•'• '.39 66.4 566.3 1.67 13.1
" °-M 5.1 98.8 0.04 82.4
3.16 61.9 1191.0 0.40 6.8
'•«• 2S.9 791.2 0.35 10.6
3? 1'°3 W.9 397.0 0.15 20.8
J-38 14.6 402.9 0.37 20.8
I °'36 18-0 437.2 0.50 19.0
•« 112.8 404.3 1.59 15.1
HC CO C02 NOX MPO
'.1 299.9 0.89 25.0
7.22 196.0 1244.2 2.43 5.6
5.15 220.4 728.7 1.4? 8.1
2.68 122.2 62J|.0 1.82 10.(
1.20 13.9 216.7 0.33 36.e
5-55 33§.4 744.1 2.88 6.8
1.34 26.3 238.7 0.61 31.2
3.75 246.8 563.8 1.29 9.2
2.19 27.3 224.5 0.45 32.3
6.39 422.3 67.1'0 i-3§ 6-6
2.73 31.2 231.7 0.44 30.7
6.80 437.2 715.9 1.42 6.2
1.96 26.2 222.9 0.44 32.8
0.70 13.1 244.4 1.02 33.2
5.§7 125.6 469.7 0.49 12.6
5.89 342.7 790.0 1.81 6.6
1.79 21.7 210.2 0.30 35.5
5.97 353.4 704.9 1.44 6.9
2.39 30.5 244.8 0.38 29.5
7.17 468.2 819.2 2.42 5.6
2.50 33.3 235.9 0.44 30.0
5.06 188.8 1012.4 3.16 6.7
4.48 294.5 580.0 1.33 8.4
1.81 26.0 212.1 0.45 34.3
1.48 26.8 324.5 1.4? 23.9
fill
30.1
W:T 21!:? ?:« M
12:1 m 1:8 21:?
3.19 145.5 443.9 1.08 13.0
3.31 146.7 461.4 1.13 12.6
0.61 13.4 67.6 0.06 98.0
7.89 146.1 610.9 0.56 6.3
3.97 74.2 419.0 0.34 16.2
2.93 53.5 312.9 0.23 21.6
1.12 6.6 306.1 1.41 27.5
1.02 19.6 376.7 0.51 21.5
1.66 62.3 447.1 1.17 16.1
*HI8810H WSUI.T3 IN OH/U18 PBR MILS (PIR M1NUTB FOR XDLC)
KOMW IN M1UE8 PBR dALLON (HZNUTBS PIR QALLOM P01 IDLB)
tCOWM CW.CULAT10NS ASSOMK A 111.85 CARBOM TO KYDROQBN RATIO
VEH YEAR MAKE MODL CID
033 1975 OLDS CUTL 350
HC CO^ C02 NOX MPG
"r7o"i56Tj~iiooT6""iT55 STi
(5.12 3.6 271.1 0.06 32.0
1.47 94.2 1219.3 0-88 6.S
2.35 77.6 778.6 1.05 9.8
2.01 70.4 6$2.0 1.95 11.5
0.81 13.1 188.7 0.25 41.9
6.50 457.1 641.2 0.72 6.4
1.08 23.5 238.2 0.55 31.9
4.49 273.9 530.1 1.19 9.1
1.43 21.1 225.1 0.41 33.8
6.57 430.5 616.3 0.83 6.8
2.16 25.2 218.1 0.4Q 33.6
6.29 382.1 694.5 1.36 6.7
1.20 20.1 221.8 0.45 34.5
0.54 8.2 213.0 0.58 39.0
0.26 2.1 534.4 0.82 16.5
4.13 196.4 820.3 2.41 7.8
0.85 8.9 202.7 0.30 40.5
3.06 133.4 778.2 2.32 8.9
1.10 9.5 228.0 0.32 36.0
7.13 503.1 726.0 0.99 5.8
1.46 19.9 234.0 0.45 32.9
2.77 101-3 1015.6 2.60 7.5
4.11 261.6 562.5 1.18 9.0
1.10 18.0 210.0 0.46 36.7
0.13 3.7 280.0 0.93 31-0
3.66 180.3 703.1 2.59 8.9
1.05 17.3 244.3 0.55 32.3
2.51 93-4 895.0 1.81 8.5
5.58 361.3 599.0 1.21 7.5
1.08 19.2 202.8 0.50 37.5
0.35 6.3 275.8 0.39 36.9
2.43 116.4 447.5 0.98 13-9
2.56 116.8 460.2 1.03 13.5
0.00 0.0 65.3 0.07 135.8
0.00 0.0 794.3 0.42 11.2
0.03 0.0 563.8 0.38 15.7
0.06 0.0 372.3 0.31 23.8
0.18 0.5 316.6 0.62 27.9
0.68 15.7 378.0 0.40 21.9
1.75 61.1 452.5 1.23 16.0
1-13
-------
APPENDIX E.CONT'D
LISTING OF MODAL RESULTS ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES
DENVER
MODE
NO.
1
2
I
I
I
9
10
11
12
H
ii
i!
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
IS
29
30
tt
BAG
ACT.
CALC.
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
VEH YEAR MAKE MODL CID
034 1975 OLDS DELT 455
HC CO C02 NOX HPG
2.57 104.9 ^327.3 5.69 5.9
0.51 7.9 340.2 0.47 25.1
1.29 4q.1 1392.2 2.02 6.0
1.42 48.5 965.6 2.86 8.5
1.55 49.1 790.7 3.60 10.2
0.27 1.1 182.5 0.35 17.9
1.38 367.5 851.8 2.69 6.2
0.27 0.8 196.1 0.61 14,8
1.79 72.3 779.5 5-09 9.9
0.17 1.1 208.3 0.37 12.2
2'.92 160.1 905.5 5.11 7.6
0.30 2.6 192.1 0.19 15.0
2.95 119.1 950.8 5.10 7.1
0.17 0.9 195.1 0.35 15.0
0.11 1.9 238.7 0.75 36.7
0.23 11.2 679.5 0.71 12.7
2.71 104.4 1006.1 5.25 7.5
0.18 1.4 205.9 0.38 42.5
2.48 90.7 997.7 5.73 1-1
0.19 1.7 253.1 0.38 34.6
4.74 353.1 955.0 3.37 5.8
0.25 2.6 215.4 0.40 40.3
2.41 81.3 1124.1 1.13 7.0
2.08 78.0 789.5 5.00 9.7
0.23 2.8 185.8 0.14 16.5
0.21 2.7 312.8 0.84 25.5
2.42 88.9 862.7 4.85 8.8
0.25 2.6 231.8 0.47 37.5
2.62 88.9 986.6 3.50 7.8
2.82 153.9 844.7 4.72 8.1
0.31 2.8 177.2 0.51 48.6
0.29 5.3 325.6 0.43 26.5
1.11 54.4 538.9 2.20 14.1
1.16 51.2 535.7 2.20 14.3
0.08 0.0 78.0 0.04 113.4
0.81 0.0 973.1 0.48 9.1
0.43 0.0 495.9 0.16 17.8
0.21 0.0 449.6 0.27 19.7
0.11 0.0 361.4 1.08 24.5
0.10 0.0 423.4 0.98 20.9
0.10 0.5 504.7 2.23 17.5
VEH
035
HC
4.98
1-35
4.49
2.55
1.92
0.52
3.02
0.28
0.35
0.23
0.91
0.55
8:1?
?:H
1-59
0.42
1.15
0.36
1.60
0.43
2.08
0.65
0.44
0.61
0.67
0.36
1.74
1.35
0.47
0.71
0.72
0.76
0.39
5.20
2.71
1.75
1.29
0.45
0.62
YEAR
1975
CO
140.4
21.9
128.8
26.2
5.7
"U
1:1
2U
1I:)
12.6
24.2
3i:3
22.6
7.0
3?:l
1:8
if:!
11.6
6.9
48.1
30.8
6.2
21.4
18.3
17.8
9.7
140.3
76.1
46.3
22.0
4.8
12.7
MAKE
PLYM
C02
1122.1
339.2
1295.8
792.9
644.1
210.3
783.3
235.5
686.7
231.8
889.2
235.2
917.3
208. T
249.8
670.1
924.7
220.4
SiH
1018.3
244.5
1027.8
721.4
212.5
356.5
822.3
248.6
925.1
757.8
213.3
353.0
523.0
519.8
88.0
1056.0
620.1
431.2
287.2
339.8
397.4
MODL
FURY
NOX
6.19
0.76
2.02
2.60
5.50
0.58
7.69
0.57
6.57
0.39
7.78
0.72
*:i?
o°:l53
l-\\
5.36
0.45
9.93
0.82
4.02
6.49
0.85
0.80
6.29
0.77
2.99
8.10
0.88
0.82
2.93
2.96
0.07
0.73
0.43
0.30
0.95
0.97
3.05
CID
318
MPG
6.5
23.5
5.9
9.9
12.8
40.2
,u
12.8
37.3
9.6
35.4
39:§
32.8
12.4
9.0
37.7
9.6
31.6
8.2
34.4
7.9
12.0
8:i
10.5
34.1
8.8
10.9
11:1
16.0
16.1
84.9
6.9
11.9
17.4
27.2
25.5
21.2
VEH
036
HC
1?:?i
3:33
2.21
0.7d
2.95
0.69
2.36
1.40
4.26
1.98
5.06
1.45
0.52
1.35
7.24
1.19
3-20
1.23
5-36
1.55
9-67
2.49
1.42
0.85
4.30
1.39
4.09
2.80
1.36
0.83
2.28
2.33
0.22
3.65
3-51
0.75
0.55
0.90
1.19
YEAR
1975
CO
*M:l
87.6
81.7
99.3
7.4
113.1
11.0
95.6
11.1
130.5
11.5
152.1
10.2
2l'.0
176.2
12.8
105.6
13.8
110.1
13.2
185.1
104.0
11.4
11.1
126.1
12.3
108.2
125.8
10.9
14.5
59.1
59.0
4.7
57.2
9.9
7.2
0.9
6.6
26.8
MAKE
PLYM
C02
680.9
247.8
1033.5
525.2
402.9
148.2
431.2
180.5
428.8
168.8
441.2
176.8
501-3
162.8
186.3
530.7
513.5
157.2
470.3
185.9
444.2
188.2
669-9
433-7
148.6
261.3
463-9
179.4
615.7
440.7
152.8
243.7
338.1
338.7
66.6
772.5
505.3
338.7
216.3
244.5
311-6
HODL
DOST
NOX
2.61
0.62
2.99
1.9?
1.93
0.63
4.18
0.81
2.82
0.57
4.07
0.63
4.37
0.61
0.79
0.91
3.26
0.51
1:11
til
2.75
3.1'
0.59
0.79
J.88
0.59
2.07
3.29
0.68
2.05
2.02
0.06
1.60
0.-8
0.55
1.2*
2.08
2.12
CID
225
HPG
ill
S:l
l\:\
li:i
J33:5
4*1
tt
10.9
49.0
ftl
13.0
41.5
9.0
1U
51.9
31.5
13.1
43-7
11.1
13.7
51.0
33-0
20.3
20.2
119-0
10.2
16.7
25.2
40.
34.4
At ft
24.8
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE (PER MINUTE FOR IDLE)
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON (MINUTES PER GALLON FOR IDLE)
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
E-14
-------
APPENDIX E.CONT'D
LISTING OP MODAL RESULTS ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES
DKNVKR
SY
2
1
6
I
''j
11
12
13
14
15
10
ii
19
20
21
22
8
25
V.
V
'A
t't
31
32
Crtj
ACT.
Ill
JH
36
37
36
39
VKII
037
HC
o!o7
0.56
0.«9
1.15
0.05
3.02
0.29
1.30
0.07
2.54
0.10
2.51
0.06
0.02
0.00
i:H
1.81
0.20
3.12
0.08
1.15
1.89
0.09
O.Ofi
2.24
0.08
0.20
2.10
0.19
0.07
0.85
0.89
0.03
0.57
0.39
0-28
0.27
0.10
0 Ofl
VKAR MARK
1975 PONT
CO C02
_ — — — — — — " — "'"
87-3 I2?8-]
2.2 401.6
23.9 1104.0
if. 2 835.6
33.4 688.1
1.0 256.3
162.1 812.3
1.6 282.8
37.9 690.5
0.0 281.4
86.8 888.6
1.1 302.5
89-7 929.7
0.8 268.6
1.6 302.1
0.0 821.6
88.5 935.5
2.6 257.6
60.7 887.1
3-3 309.9
116.0 1045.1
0.0 295.7
50.5 1103.6
66.8 720.5
0.8 257.0
2.3 415.7
81.9 814.9
0.0 300.4
7-1 1017.8
74.0 789.9
1-7 246.3
2.2 393.2
31.0 5118.5
31.0 558.7
0.0 102.3
0.0 1247.5
0.0 663.4
0.0 Jl(l9 3
0.0 378.H
0.0 H15.9
0-0 508.4
MODI.
CATA
NOX
— •—.—» —
5.39
0.57
2.80
4.57
3.81
0.83
5.54
2.69
5.96
1.83
7.50
1.98
V.ll
0.75
0.60
5.60
0.63
5.94
0.6l
9.24
1.71
6.23
5-38
1.82
0.94
5.10
1.50
6.95
6.28
o!4B
3.67
3-79
0.07
0.66
0.17
0.17
0.78
2.60
5.49
CID
400
MPG
6n
.2
21.7
6.1
10.3
11.9
34J
8.2
31.0
11.8
31.5
8.6
29.1
8.2
32.9
29.1
10.8
8.2
33.8
2-°
28.1
7.2
30.0
iZ:?
34.3
21.2
9.3
29.5
8.6
9.7
35.6
22.4
14.8
14.5
86.7
7.1
13-4
20.0
23.4
21.3
17.5
VEH YF.AR
038 1975
HC CO
9Q£ OQ1 n
• 40 cy i . u
O.So 15.7
6.15 128.2
3.49 121.8
3.06 81.5
0.97 12.8
5.30 201.3
0.47 10.3
3.39 116.1
0.63 10.9
5-26 236.1
1.42 19-6
5.89 227.8
0.69 14.2
0.15 1.7
0.16 5.1
5.29 217.5
1.05 18.3
3-92 142.5
1.58 23.3
6.59 274.7
1.13 18.3
4.94 174.6
3.58 137.7
0.70 13.1
0.22 8.1
4.84 187.7
1.00 18.3
4.S5 171.7
3.81 150.2
1.08 15.2
0.35 13-3
2.56 82.3
2.65 85.8
0.00 0.0
0.06 0.0
0.21 0.0
0.18 0.0
0.10 0.0
0.13 6.4
0.13 7.7
MAKE
PONT
C02
IfiCfl ft
1 V JV • O
281.5
'®:l
633.6
206.4
748.5
240.0
598.7
223-6
727.7
230.7
770.5
224.3
222.7
514.9
804.4
193.7
791.1
230.0
842.1
227.4
963-8
631.9
220.3
299.4
23i'.
-------
APPENDIX E.CONT'D
LISTING OP MODAL RESULTS ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES
DENVER
MODE
NO.
1
2
i
I
I
1*
11
12
\t
15
ii
3
21
22
11
Ii
i!
3§
VEH YEAR
010 1976
HC CO
11-36 126.2
3.21 81.1
10.01 331.5
1.22 135.1
3-09 78.7
1.11 35.7
0.81 10.8
1.30 16.3
1.01 16.6
2.26 12.5
2.99 11.5
3.59 11.6
3.08 66.5
2.13 38.6
1.99 66.1
5-33 171.3
6.13 103-5
2.07 19.1
2.55 83.5
2.29 59.2
1-13 57.3
3.05 56.1
7.12 198.8
1.29 51.2
2.19 37.0
2.88 95.2
1.37 75.7
2.63 53-0
7.15 200.2
1.20 51.6
MAKE
CAPR
C02
179il
786.0
119-3
387.2
101.6
110.1
109-0
121.7
117.1
511-9
118.1
557-9
110.6
111-3
310.9
621.1
106.9
535.1
127.1
551.5
116.5
508.2
110.0
13:3
122.6
157.9
116.5
MODL
SEDA
NOX
0.15
1.11
0.65
1.22
0.11
0.91
0.16
1.62
0.18
1.20
0.15
1.11
0.16
0.08
0.19
1.51
0.09
1.15
0.12
1.36
0.10
1.02
1.31
0.19
0.12
1 .27
0.16
0.67
1.11
CID
110
Ii
,!:i
17-8
51.8
18.6
17.7
17.8
16.5
8:8
11:1
10.0
11.1
11.0
16.6
13.2
39.0
j?:i
10.5
16.9
Ii:?
i?:2
16.6
VEH YEAR
011 1975
HC CO
K12 12'.1
6.06 153.2
2.52 65.9
2.19 62.3
0.63 7.7
3.36 127.0
5.63 9.1
2.10 89.7
0.50 7.9
3:3* "11
1:11 "?:1
0.66 8.2
1.20 33-7
3.38 112.1
0.58 7.1
2.12 59.5
0.57 8.3
3-90 161.3
0.51 9.0
3-65 117.3
2.66 101.0
0.17 7.1
0.98 10.9
2.72 95.1
0.47 8.2
2.91 75.7
3.07 123.0
MAKE
DATS
C02
'sosTa™
131.9
138.6
361.3
321.8
125.7
113.3
150.3
323.3
135.8
118.6
133.2
150.1
138.6
122.0
191.8
116.0
122.2
119.8
12$. 5
159-0
135.8
113.8
351.1
135.5
117.9
389.1
135.7
111.1
101.0
MODL
B210
NOX
t'.ti
I'M
?:§!
1.12
1.71
tel
11?
1.39
1.32
0.98
0.29
1.55
O.B2
5.62
0.85
1.22
1.15
1:8
1.38
1.22
1.16
1.20
1:11
CID
"85
MPG
"TTTi
57.1
1§:I
20.8
63.5
11.2
53.3
18.8
59.2
ll:l
&?
61.8
35.3
11.0
65.1
J7-2
62.8
12.2
58.5
M
11:1
16.2
59.1
16.1
11.6
VEH YEAR
012 1975
HC CO
iTie'TsiTg"
0.57 16.6
3-62 133.7
2.33 65.1
2.01 68.5
0.13 13.5
I'M 1{°5:2
2.27 109.6
0.36 11.2
1.01 157.5
0.81 11.2
1.66 171.5
0.19 10.6
0.70 11-3
0.83 22.3
3-Z8 ^s.?
0.15 12.1
2.87 92.9
0.69 13-0
5.39 165.7
0.55 12.5
5.26 121.1
2.11 110.5
0.16 11.8
1.06 15.5
3-28 131-8
0.13 11-6
2.'53 Ill'o
HAKE
BOND
C02
i&f
m-.i
?IU
m
238.1
126.9
256.8
126.9
279.0
122.6
120.6
320.8
ffl:l
m
258. 2
129.5
371.9
252.9
lil:?
275.0
133-5
S:I
HODL CID
HOX HPO
Mi £\
0.52 11.9
1.02 a;?
1.36 23.3
O-'S 6U
?:8 3:1
I'M ft)
?:§5o fij
0.97 15.8
0.96 63.0
0.11) 63.1
0.30 24,8
1.15 17.0
0.13 63.9
1.78 18.5
0.41 59.«
0.81 16.6
0.90 56.8
1.69 15.3
1.2* 20.1
1.05 60.5
0.25 52.T
1.26 18.0
0.90 58.0
1.6< 17.3
1.20 20.6
31 2-51 37.2 103.2 0.17 52.3
32 2.90 95.6 118.0 0.09 28.9
BAG
ACT. 2.16 73.2 315.6 0.75 20.2
CALC. 2.51 71.6 295.3 0.61 21.1
33 0.61 19.5 17.1 0.03 111.2
31 0.68 1.5 953.6 0.10 9.3
35 0.08 0.0 691.9 0.31 12.8
36 0.07 0.0 371.6 0.20 23.7
37 0.03 0.0 311.8 0.33 28.2
38 1.51 18.1 199.4 Q.15 31.7
39 1.72 55.1 217.6 1.05 26.1
0.51 6.9 125.8 1.26 61.2
0.69 8.9 131.1 0.85 59.1
1.55 18.6 261.3 2.88 25.7
1.61 19.3 261.2 2.67 25.6
0.22 1.9 19-2 0.01 321.6
2.35 51-9 291.1 0.11 23.1
1.52 39-3 196.7 0.11 33-7
1.31 31-3 163.7 0.23 10.9
0.98 7.9 182.1 1.91 11.9
1.09 10.7 215.9 2.50 37.6
1.01 12.1 281.3 1.11 29.2
II:!
1.75 65.9 210.1 1.11 27.8
1.82 65.9 207-5 1-09 28-°
0.15 1.0 25.1 0.01275-2
1.89 60.7 328.7 0.08 20.6
0.63 37.9 126-0 0.22 1«
0.31 21.6 275.0 0.1" 2»-6
0.13 19.7 209-0 0.25 *•«
0.67 25.1 175-6 0.85 «-
0.90 28.7 222.9 2-91 **
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE (PER MINUTE FOR IDLE)
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON (MINUTES PER GALLON FOR IDLE)
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
E-16
-------
APPENDIX E.CONT'D
LISTING OF MODAL RESULTS ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES
DENVER
HOPE
DO.
'l
2
VKH TEAK HAKB MODL CID
0»3 H75 TOIO COHO 133
HC CO C02 NOX __MPG
11:8
9
10
I!
\l
BAG
W.
35
36
37
38
39
Jjj f,:?
11 3 25 138.8 443.8 3.47 13.2
12 o!l7 7.2 192.5 1-97 43-2
13 3.38 137.8 467-3 3-85 J2-8
i« 6.37 6.8 177.0 1.95 47.0
15 0.50 16.3 187.4 0.37 41.4
16 0.74 25.8 366.1 0.20 21.7
17 3.08 81.9 488.6 4.63 14.2
1J 0.14 9.7 172.1 0.82 47.0
19 2.41 64.3 473.5 4.72 15.2
20 0.51 11.1 196.8 0.95 41.1
II MS 19l|-2 508-1 3-53 10.7
22 0.47 7.2 195-5 1.99 42.6
|3 2.88 65.5 552.6 3-90 13-4
'' 1-84 57.9 409.7 1.07 17.5
•5 0.41 6.1 172.7 2.23 48.2
16 O-'l 15.3 274.7 0.39 29.6
•1 2.20 57.7 152 9 5 70 16 i
» o.4i '6.5 ;n:f m i|:j
'•36 10.9 311.0 3.13 23.2
'•13 12.0 320.0 3.18 22.7
°'29 9-0 32.5 0.00 186.9
3-01 89.9 110.2 0.00 15.0
'•23 10.1 257.9 0.00 27.3
°-98 35.1 200.7 0.04 31 2
M5 20.8 235.7 0.22 32.9
'•08 18.8 236.1 2.77 33.0
°'66 '2.3 311.0 6.10 26.7
VEH YEAR MAKE MODL CID
044 1975 VOLK SEDA 97
HC
CO
C02 NOX MPG
.._
5.11 103.8 444.6 2
1.59 28.1 159.3 0.73 42.
5.73
3.22
2.39
0.56
2.23
1.04
1.71
1:
3.04
1.35
1.27
2.91
564.5 1.61 10.8
333-8 2.3d 21.3
281.6 2.77 26.7
100.3 1.23 75.3
247.9 2.54 28.0
123.9 1.87 61.5
290.2
115.5
285.9
119.1
308.7
112.6
8:?
66.2
11.7
49.5
14.2
8.4 107.1 1.40
31.2 155.9 0.71
.82
4.81
2.42
1.21
3.82
T.17
2.96
3.26
:K si:
25.0
64.8
24.5
62.3
22.0
67.2
116.4 0.36 55.
309-7 0 "
.36 55.7
.65 20.7
18.
71.
3.04 21.6
0.75 57.8
2.86 50.6 286.7 2.93 23.6
2.06 16.0 125.2 1.32 56.5
5.29 90.6 430.4 3.28 15.1
2.37 34.2 283-0 3.28 25.1
71.0
42.0
21.2
60.3
16.7
25.5
.4 108.5 1.40 69.8
1 147.1 0.50
69.
43.
2.21 33-4 234.8 2.44 30.2
2.28 34.0 230.3 2.44 30.5
0.32 10.8 33-5 0.00 172.4
3-59 131.5 493.0 0.00 12.5
2.85 70.2 400.6 0.19 17.1
1-73 43.0 235.9 0.06 28.7
1.57 24.5 174.7 0.63 40.7
1.48 13.4 185.1 2.11 42.1
1.67 14.4 244.9 3.57 32.5
VEH
045
HC
0:?I
Ul
8:?53
o2:!?
0:?2
2.06
0.16
1.81
0.13
0.12
0.32
1.44
0.11
0.87
0.13
3.22 1
0.19
2.08
1.43
0.18
0.19
1.29
0.11
1.80
1.97
0.19
0.19
YEAR
1975
CO
50.0
1.1
80.1
10.7
16.7
0.5
99.4
2.3
59-2
1.1
82.9
1.3
65.0
2.0
0.8
5.6
**3
16.4
0.7
1 38. 9
2.0
51.1
59-1
2.5
1.1
42.2
2.0
32.5
95.1
2.0
1.1
MAKE
VOLK
C02
712.8
252.2
818.6
517.9
451.7
178.9
513.5
217.4
431.1
195.8
531.5
208.0
541.5
194.0
217.0
529.2
nu
562.1
214.0
567.4
210.4
613.3
447.1
191.4
284.5
515.7
210.4
HM
196.0
277.4
HODL
STAW
NOX
4.47
0.40
0.57
3-11
0.51
4.31
0.90
Ul
4.91
0.64
3.87
0.65
0.29
0.25
4.18
0.42
4.57
0.37
4.71
0.67
3-21
3.11
0.60
0.12
4.70
0.69
2.35
3.59
0.88
0.31
CID
90
MPG
11.1
34.9
itt
18.5
49.3
itt
16.8
44.8
&1
13.6
44.9
40.6
16.5
14.1
48.6
15.0
41.2
11.2
41.4
12.7
16.3
45-3
30.9
15.1
41.5
11.0
13-9
11.1
31.7
0.76 23.5 364.3 2.15 22.0
0.82 25.1 364.6 2.09 21.8
0.19 3.7 56.9 0.00 140.2
0.50 5.1 781.2 0.05 11.2
0.23 0.0 443.2 0.11 20.0
0.14 0.0 283.2 0.05 31-3
0.26 0.2 219.5 0.60 40.2
0.21 0.2 286.6 1.08 30.9
0.19 3.9 360.9 2.02 24.1
RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE (PER MINUTE FOR IDLE)
FUEL OFff IH M1L8S PER GALLOH (HINUTBS PER GALLON POtf IDLE)
ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
E-17
-------
E-18
-------
APPENDIX F
-------
APPENDIX F - LISTING OF CLAYTON KEY MODE AND
REPLICATE EMISSION RESULTS ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES
VEHICLE - Vehicle Number
HAKE - Vehicle Make
MODEL * Vehicle Model
CID - Engine Displacement in Cubic Inches
HP - Dynamometer Horsepower setting as specified in the table below
Following are the three modes of the test High Speed, Low Speed,
and Idle in Drive as specified in the table below. During each
of these modes the following data were taken.
HC - Exhaust Hydrocarbon Concentration in PPM Hexane
CO - Exhaust Carbon Monoxide Concentration in per cent
NOX - Exhaust Oxides of Nitrogen Concentration in PPM
Class of
Vehicle by
Height (NADA)
2000 to
2774 Ib.
2775 to
3774 Ib.
3775 Ib.
and up
1 •
Transmission
Range/Gear
Drive or
Third Gear
Drive or
High Gear
Drive or
High Gear
Meter
Dyno Load
HP@MPH
15(338
24(?46
30350
High Speed
Cruise
(MPH)
36-38
44-46
48-50
Low Speed
Cruise
(MPH)
22-25
29-32
32-35
Idle
Auto-
matic
trans
mission
in
Drive
P-l
-------
APPENDIX
LISTING OF CLAYTON KEY MODE AND REPLICATE
EMISSION RESULTS ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES
DENVER
VKHUH.K MAKE MODEL
001
002
003
004
005
006
007
008
009
010
Oil
012
013
014
015
016
01?
018
019
020
021
022
023
024
025
026
027
028
029
030
CHEV TRUC
REPLICATE TEST
CHEV TRUC
REPLICATE TEST
CHEV TRUC
REPLICATE TEST
CHEV TRUC
REPLICATE TEST
DODG TRUC
REPLICATE TEST
FORD TRUC
REPLICATE TEST
FORD TRUC
REPLICATE TEST
FORD TRUC
REPLICATE TEST
FORD TRUC
REPLICATE TEST
CMC THUC
REPLICATE TEST
A(«0 HORN
REPLICATE TEST
BUIC CNTY
REPLICATE TEST
BUIC RIVI
REPLICATE TEST
BUIC REGA
REPLICATE TEST
CADI ELDO
REPLICATE TEST
CHEV VEGA
REPLICATE TEST
CHEV NOVA
REPLICATE TEST
CHEV MONT
REPLICATE TEST
CHEV CAPR
REPLICATE TEST
CHEV IHPA
REPLICATE TEST
CHEV STAW
REPLICATE TEST
PElCATlE|isT
DODG CORO
REPLICATE TEST
DODG DART
REPLICATE TEST
FORD MUST
REPLICATE TEST
FORD TORI
REPLICATE TEST
FORD GRAN
REPLICATE TEST
FORD LTD
REPLICATE TEST
FORD LTD
REPLICATE TEST
MERC MARQ
REPLICATE TEST
CID
JbU
350
350
350
318
302
302
351
351
350
258
350
455
350
500
140
250
350
350
350
400
400
318
225
140
351
250
351
400
400
HP
24.0
24.0
30.0
24.0
24.0
21.0
21.0
30.0
30.0
30.0
24.0
30.0
30.0
30.0
30.0
15.0
24.0
30.0
30.0
30.0
30 0
30.0
24.0
24.0
15.0
30.0
24.0
30.0
30.0
30.0
— HIGH 3PEED —
HC CO NOX
PPM/HEX % PPH
..
25
50
90
ft
30
35
15
35
20
25
80
70
85
100
25
30
85
95
110
120
90
125
11
360
220
110
110
70
95
100
110
85
110
90
85
15
35
\\
i°5
18
30
29
20
30
li
ig
30
30
90
105
0.20
0.20
1.90
2.00
1.80
1.30
0.02
0.02
0.01
0.05
0.10
0.12
0.12
0.11
0.80
0.85
1.10
1.20
0.03
0.03
Ul
1.50
4.90
2.40
2.90
2.10
1.90
9.80
to. oo
1.60
1.80
1.20
1.75
3.10
4.60
1.60
2.15
3-20
2.90
0.10
0.20
1:18
0.04
0.05
0.10
0.25
0.05
0.05
0.65
0.75
0.03
0.05
3.00
2.90
0.85
0.90
1.10
1.15
593.'82
1003.36
995.15
170.96
119.77
1318.98
1219.13
1045.23
675.73
358.31
368.58
2?f:??
1193.18
1193.18
!8i:8
995.45
895.91
2040.68
1911.11
481.20
378.82
900.97
880.50
819.07
819.07
131.33
101.02
615.02
573.35
972.61
972.61
737.16
470.96
962.40
972.64
726.92
737.16
829.31
573.35
HftSi
*$l:ll
38:tf
Ri:8
ffi:8
665.19
583.59
1015.23
915.68
1015.23
1020.31
900.97
982.88
— LOW SPEED — .. Tn._
HC CO NOX MC rn
PPM/HEX % PPM PPM/HEX ) p01
115
130
150
130
20
25
25
30
10
10
10
25
20
20
80
60
90
100
20
30
160
150
iB
200
220
li
180
160
10
55
22
20
40
60
125
120
85
50
to
20
18
45
50
250
230
20
25
25
20
25
25
130
155
20
20
90
too
4.10
1.00
3-80
3.00
0.05
0.05
0.02
0.02
0.10
0.13
0.04
0.05
0.01
0.01
1.05
0.35
0.90
0.90
0.03
0.03
1.50
0.95
1.10
1.30
1.60
5.10
2.50
2.00
3.10
3-50
0.05
0.05
0.02
0.03
0.90
0.95
1.50
1.30
2.80
1.50
0.05
0.05
0.06
0.08
0.05
0.05
2.80
1.80
0.05
0.05
0.52
0.58
0.03
0.04
3.90
4.20
0.70
0.70
2.40
2.20
202.' 04
116.17
141.43
111:11
307.15
317.39
1119.89
819.07
138.90
156.58
159.11
156.58
1113.11
255.96
327.63
307.15
327.63
307.15
1990.91
1941.14
337.87
327.63
76.16
73.15
174.05
181.29
109.53
389.06
109.53
126.28
2110.23
1990.91
239.92
232.35
217.19
222.24
207.09
169.21
307.15
286.67
U?:32
2488.64
1443.41
819.07
911-93
217.19
266.20
239.92
207.09
!U3:K
133
389.06
368.58
'56-58
181. 8«
110
170
235
230
10
20
30
30
85
10
15
25
60
75
150
150
20
20
215
190
45
140
210
220
150
155
300
280
180
220
210
220
180
20
30
15
50
10
10
is
260
250
520
540
10
10
Is
20
280
290
50
50
190
180
i:lo |?f
f-00 36.07
7.80 50,,0
oil Hil
0.02 128.80
0-02 121.22
i'el I1'15
1-55 62.13
0.0| 41.08
0.03 41.08
0.04 95,20
0.03 «:i9
0.50 245.72
0.65 151.53
2.20 88.18
2.50 82.17
0.03 166.68
0.03 176.79
2.20 307.15
1.20 409.53
0.50 53-11
1.20 67.14
2.20 29.06
1.95 32.07
MO 43.09
1.80 53.11
3.00 95.97
2.80 94.19
5.20 30.06
6.00 15.03
1:8 11!:!?
?:°6o iwJo
0°$ It:!!
?:8 flfcR
1:11 M
8:8? B:B
4 70 80.16
MO 75-15
10.00 2j.«
9.90 22.05
!:8 *J
]il &!»
*:8i W
tt fi
III M
en H6."
0-5° !3«i8
0.60 ""^
3.90 5Ht
l:lo 9«-»
-------
APPENDIX F.CONT'D
LISTING OK CLAYTON KB* MODE AND REPLICATE
EMISSION RESULTS ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES
HAKE
03?
033
034
MODEL CXD
35°
HP
"30.0
30.0
30.0
30.0
DENVER
-- HIGHSPEED.--
HC
PPM/HEX
NOX
PPM
~ LOW SPEED —
HC CO NOX
PPM/HEX % PPM
HC
PPM/HEX I
160
190
90
110
1.10
1.10
3.10
3-70
2.80
2.10
880
798
798.59
593.82
15
50
150
165
180
220
80
10
0.80 121.22
0.90 111.12
2.10
2.10
0.21
0.10
227.30
202.04
3-60 156.58
4.00 151.53
461.20
327.63
95
90
300
320
175
35
150
30
1.30
1.20
4.40
4.80
0.20
0.05
NOX
PPM
72.15
78.16
77.16
0.80 56.12
0.05 126.28
82.17
70.14
035
036
037
038
PLYH FURY
REPLICATE TEST
REPLICATE TEST
REPLICATE TEST
PONT LEMA
REPLICATE TEST
318
225
400
350
24.0
24.0
30.0
30.0
20 0.05 1244.32
30 0.10 995.55
.10 10145.23
.70 1W3.11
IIS
110
115
270
270
2.140
2.90
6.30
6.40
982.88
BH9. 78
307.15
327.63
15
20
110
100
15
20
200
0.05 1592.73
0.05 1642.50
1.30 1269.20
0.30 1393.64
0.30 1003.36
0.30 1003.36
J.OO
(.10
266.20
227.30
25
30
110
100
270
285
0.20
0.15
3.90
2.80
100 1.60
60 0.90
0.60
1.90
42.09
40.08
76.16
80.16
62.13
54.11
16.03
14.03
039
OHO
041
042
PONT CRNV
REPLICATE TEST
CAPR SEDA
REPLICATE TEST
DATS B210
REPLICATE TEST
HOND SEDA
REPLICATE TEST
455
140
85
91
30.0
15.0
15.0
15.0
80
90
180
230
130
160
100
130
3.00
3.60
6.40
90 176
JO 1667
JO 1642
2.70
2.90
655.25
665.49
15
20
310
340
170
180
247.50
186.89
136.38
116.17
0.05
0.05
8.50
9.00
1.10 1269.20
1.10 1194.55
1.70 126.28
1.90 126.28
10
10
260
280
245
260
85
95
0.05 121.22
0.05 136.38
7.30 64.13
7.80 58.12
3.40
3.40
2.20
2.10
66.14
64.13
40.08
43.09
043
044
045
TOYO COHO
REPLICATE TEST
YOLK SEDA
REPLICATE TEST
VOLK STAW
REPLICATE TEST
133
97
90
15.0
15.0
15.0
50
65
215
240
40
45
1.30 839.54
1.05 757.64
1.75 1617.61
1.85
85 1512.95
0.15
0.15
675.7]
675.73
25
35
3.20
330
22
22
1.15
1.15
3.50
3.80
0.05
0.06
1:11
532.39
511.92
217.19
224.77
210
200
170
175
30
115
4.00
3.90
5.00
4.80
0.05
1.20
51.11
53.11
82.17
80.16
16.03
16.03
F-3
-------
F-4
-------
APPENDIX G
-------
APPENDIX G - LISTING OF LOW SPEED CYCLE EMISSIONS AND
FUEL ECONOMY RESULTS ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES
Legend
No - Vehicle Number
YR - Model Year
Vehicle Make
MODL - Vehicle Model
CID - Engine Displacement In Cubic Inches
TEST TYPE - Indicates the Portion of the test or Composite
COLD TRNS1 - First bag of Cold Transient portion
of test. (240 sec - 0.82 miles)
COLD TRNS2 - Second bag of Cold Transient portion
of test. (412 sec - 0.91 miles)
COLD STAB - Cold Stabilised portion of test (658
sec -2.56 miles)
HOT TRANS - Hot Transient portion of test (652
sec - 1.73 miles)
72 WEIGHTING - Composite of Cold Transients and Cold
Stabilized portions (uses same methods
as 1972 Federal Test Procedure)
75 WEIGHTING - Composite of Total Test using same methods
as 1975 Federal Test Procedure
HC - Hydrocarbon Emissions in grams per mile
CO - Carbon Monoxide Emissions in grams per mile
C02 - Carbon Dioxide Emissions in grams per mile
NOXC - Oxides of Nitrogen Emissions Corrected for Humidity in grams
per mile
EL ECON - Fuel Economy Calculated by the Carbon Balance Method in
miles per gallon
G-l
-------
APPENDIX G
LISTING OF LOW SPEED CYCLE EMISSIONS AND FUEL
ECONOMY RESULTS ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES
DENVER
VEH
NO
011
012
013
on
015
016
YR MAKE MODL CID TEST TYPE
75 AMMO HORN 258 COLD TRNS1
COLD TRNS2
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 WEIGHTING
75 WEIGHTING
75 BUIC CNTY 350 COLD TRNS1
COLD TRNS2
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 WEIGHTING
75 WEIGHTING
75 BUIC RIVI 455 COLD TRNS1
COLD TRNS2
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 WEIGHTING
75 WEIGHTING
75 BUIC REGA 350 COLD TRNS1
COLD TRNS2
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 WEIGHTING
75 WEIGHTING
75 CADI ELDO 500 COLD TRNS1
COLD TRNS2
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 WEIGHTING
75 WEIGHTING
75 CHEV VEGA 140 COLD TRNS1
COLD TRNS2
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 WEIGHTING
75 WEIGHTING
GRAMS PER MILE
HC CO C02 NOXC
9.
3.
2.
3.
3.
3.
8.
5.
2.
2.
4.
2.
10.
7.
3.
5.
5.
5.
10.
5.
2.
4.
4.
3-
19.
13.
6.
9.
10.
9.
7.
3.
1 .
2.
2.
2.
32
95
03
30
83
10
81
23
01
34
00
94
25
49
61
98
70
05
43
44
75
18
79
95
86
08
66
72
55
04
52
03
47
50
96
34
232
72
21
22
72
43
193
92
29
38
74
50
217
191
76
101
127
104
T51
112
48
74
81
68
268
261
150
212
196
184
169
73
27
47
64
48
.2
.7
.3
.5
.5
.6
.4
.5
.1
.4
.0
.5
.9
.7
.2
.2
.7
.1
.7
.2
.5
.6
.7
.8
.2
.8
.5
.1
.6
.5
.9
.5
.6
.1
.6
.0
563
748
510
658
570
570
777
912
625
808
715
706
896
1013
722
899
817
803
826
941
616
776
725
700
1029
966
679
851
807
774
434
558
357
448
414
403
.8
.2
.0
.4
.8
.2
.0
.9
.3
.5
.3
.1
.2
.0
.2
.7
.1
.8
.4
.8
.9
.9
.8
.5
.0
.2
.8
.8
.3
.2
.5
.2
.7
.5
.9
.2
1
4
3
4
3
3
2
1
1
1
1
1
3
1
1
1
1
1
2
0
0
0
1
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
4
1
.85
.03
.81
.42
.48
.81
.13
.54
.04
.21
.36
.22
.49
.14
.01
.35
.51
.30
.00
.95
.73
.79
.02
.87
.44
.62
.30
64
1
1 A
.39
ii i
. 41
.59
1 7
.1 1
27
. Jl
22
. iJ
37
O'
36
. Ju
MPG
FUEL
ECON
9
10
16
12
12
13
8
8
13
10
10
11
7
6
10
8
8
9
8
7
12
9
10
. *
10
5
7
1
7
1
8
V
12
13
I J
21
16
16
18
.}
j
.1
.1
.6
.?
J
.0
.3
.1
.1
.5
,2
.0
.6
,\
.2
.6
.0
.1
/
.6
.
.
0
.0
.9
5
J
c
. J
5
• J
.7
.1
.2
.0
.9
.1
.9
,3
G-2
-------
APPENDIX G.CONT'D
LISTING OF LOW SPEED CYCLE EMISSIONS AND FUEL
ECONOMY RESULTS ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES
DENVER
MPG
VEH
NO YR MAKE
017 75 CHEV
018 75 CHEV
019 75 CHEV
020 75 CHEV
°21 75 CHEV
022 75 CHRY
MODL CID TEST TYPE
NOVA 250 COLD TRNS1
COLD TRNS2
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 WEIGHTING
75 WEIGHTING
MONT 350 COLD TRNS1
COLD TRNS2
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 WEIGHTING
75 WEIGHTING
CAPR 350 COLD TRNS1
COLD TRNS2
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 WEIGHTING
75 WEIGHTING
IMPA 350 COLD TRNS1
COLD TRNS2
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 WEIGHTING
75 WEIGHTING
STAW 400 COLD TRNS1
COLD TRNS2
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 WEIGHTING
75 WEIGHTING
NEWP 400 COLD TRNS1
COLD TRNS2
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 WEIGHTING
75 WEIGHTING
7
3
1
1
2
2
7
4
2
2
3
3
7
4
0
2
2
1
8
3
1
2
3
2
11
1
0
1
2
1
30
3
1
2
7
3
HC
.30
• 31
.49
.57
.99
.15
.07
.75
.27
.77
.72
.01
.72
.87
.58
.28
.85
.95
.64
.75
.44
.25
• 30
.43
.81
.31
.69
.57
.95
.86
.34
.21
.10
.39
.14
.99
unnno i
CO
110
30
14
14
36
23
171
112
51
57
87
68
127
77
33
50
61
49
179
81
37
52
73
56
204
17
9
26
48
30
79
35
12
33
30
24
.2
.4
.5
.8
.2
.9
.3
.3
.6
.7
.3
.4
.9
• 3
.7
.0
.0
.2
.1
.5
.5
.6
.9
.6
.7
-9
.3
.1
.4
.0
.6
.6
.3
.7
.1
.9
re. n nx i^c.
C02
689.
872.
569.
720.
656.
641 .
818.
865.
591.
754.
692.
672.
963-
982.
672.
859.
793.
767 .
951 .
1034.
710.
906.
825.
804.
1099.
1211.
843-
1038.
970.
942.
934.
1159.
819.
1019.
913.
906.
3
3
7
8
8
9
3
2
5
2
9
5
9
0
1
8
6
5
7
0
1
9
0
8
1
5
0
5
1
6
8
9
7
1
8
0
NOXC
2.
3.
1 .
2.
2.
2.
1.
1.
1 .
1.
1 .
1.
2.
0.
0.
1 .
1 .
1 .
2.
1 .
0.
0.
1 .
0.
1 .
1 .
1 .
1.
1.
1 .
3-
2.
2.
2.
2.
2.
60
44
86
27
34
16
91
22
21
16
35
26
39
95
94
00
22
08
02
04
79
96
08
95
84
59
45
48
55
50
27
64
26
14
53
35
r UfcL,
ECON
10.
9.
14.
1 1.
12.
12.
8.
8.
13.
10.
10.
11.
7.
7.
12.
9.
9.
10.
7.
7.
1 1 .
8.
9.
9.
6.
7.
10.
8.
8.
8.
7.
7.
10.
8.
9.
9.
0
5
9
8
3
9
0
4
1
4
5
2
5
9
2
4
9
4
0
6
5
9
3
8
1
1
3
2
4
9
7
2
5
2
0
3
G-3
-------
APPENDIX G.CONT'D
LISTING OF LOW SPEED CYCLE EMISSIONS AND FUEL
ECONOMY RESULTS ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES
DENVER
VEH
NO YR MAKE MODL
023 75 DODG CORO
•
024 75 DODG DART
025 75 FORD MUST
026 75 FORD TORI
027 75 FORD GRAN
028 75 FORD LTD
CID TEST TYPE
318 COLD TRNS1
COLD TRNS2
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 WEIGHTING
75 WEIGHTING
225 COLD TRNS1
COLD TRNS2
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 WEIGHTING
75 WEIGHTING
140 COLD TRNS1
COLD TRNS2
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 WEIGHTING
75 WEIGHTING
351 COLD TRNS1
COLD TRNS2
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 WEIGHTING
75 WEIGHTING
250 COLD TRNS1
COLD TRNS2
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 WEIGHTING
75 WEIGHTING
351 COLD TRNS1
COLD TRNS2
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 WEIGHTING
75 WEIGHTING
MPr
GRAMS PER MILE PUJ[
HC C0 C02 NOXC ECON
8.67
7.22
3.44
5.10
5.24
4.60
10.05
7.81
4.23
6.83
6.10
5.63
4.02
0.81
0.37
0.97
1.16
0.85
6.46
3.40
1.76
2.67
3.01
2.51
3.61
0.55
0.37
1 .40
1 .03
0.89
7.70
4.85
2.31
3.73
3.88
3.31
148.9
166.0
78 .2
95.1
110.3
95.9
171 .7
189.4
95.5
146.9
130.0
122.1
33.4
7.3
2.8
7.1
9.6
6.7
86.0
56.8
30.9
36.2
47.0
39.1
59.3
6.4
2.6
5.5
14.3
8.3
116.5
108.3
49.8
74.4
75.0
66.3
851.4
897.1
583.7
737.7
701 .3
669.7
517.1
507.0
387.2
442.8
437.5
421 .6
596.3
736.7
471 .0
603-0
551 .3
535.9
931.6
1066.3
720.5
911.5
834.2
813-3
755.7
948.3
616.0
786.1
713-2
696.9
984.1
1156.0
774.4
970.9
895. *
871 -6
3.19 8.0
2.44 7.5
2.08 12. i|
2-30 9.8
2.37 10.0
2.26 10.6
4.63 10.8
1.41 10.?
1.61 16.1
1.48 12.8
2.14 13.1
1.81 11.1
0.79 13-1
0.70 11.8
0.95 18.6
0.88 11.1
0.87 15.6
0.90 16.2
2.63 8.2
2.26 7-6
1.65 H-5
1 A 1
2.24 9-1
_ rt "?
1.97 9."
* « r \
1.92 10.1
1.95 10-3
/* A fl /
1.09 "•'
it 1 ii 5
1.16 H-j
- AT 1 1 1
1 ,27 l'1'
. - f\ i o 0
1.30 I''"
* » r 1 0 h
1.25 I'-3
2.85 T.J
4 -7K 6.'
];^ 10.3
1 7? 8.'
' 8.7
' 5-°
1 J
G-4
-------
APPENDIX G.CONT'D
LISTING OF LOW SPEED CYCLE EMISSIONS AND FUEL
ECONOMY RESULTS ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES
DENVER
MPG
VEH
NO YR MAKE MODL
029 75 FORD LTD
V *• J * ~
030 75 MERC MARQ
031 75 MERC MONO
032 75 OLDS DELT
°33 75 OLDS CUTL
034 75 OLDS DELT
CID TEST TYPE
400 COLD TRNS1
COLD TRNS2
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 WEIGHTING
75 WEIGHTING
400 COLD TRNS1
COLD TRNS2
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 WEIGHTING
75 WEIGHTING
351 COLD TRNS1
COLD TRNS2
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 WEIGHTING
75 WEIGHTING
350 COLD TRNS1
COLD TRNS2
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 WEIGHTING
75 WEIGHTING
350 COLD TRNS1
COLD TRNS2
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 WEIGHTING
75 WEIGHTING
455 COLD TRNS1
COLD TRNS2
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 WEIGHTING
75 WEIGHTING
9
3
1
3
3
2
7
5
2
4
4
3
5
2
1
2
2
2
9
8
3
5
5
5
7
3
1
2
2
2
7
3
1
2
2
2
HC
.38
.05
.57
.59
.38
.81
.13
.14
.93
.52
.20
.84
.01
.98
.68
.82
.59
.33
.38
.03
.98
.95
.87
.25
.68
.23
.01
.28
.76
.05
.76
.02
.30
.1T
.90
.17
u n n. ri o
CO
90.
76.
39.
53.
57.
50.
158.
117.
57.
85.
89.
77.
96.
87.
36.
51 .
58.
49.
152.
201 .
102.
154.
133.
127.
84.
34.
14.
37.
32.
27.
107.
31-
16.
33.
37.
29.
i
5
8
2
5
0
2
3
7
7
9
7
9
3
7
4
1
7
4
7
4
7
1
2
6
1
7
7
7
2
5
8
7
8
8
4
6
Ci n riJL
C02
1074.
7274.
837.
1046.
975.
944.
1052.
1143.
789.
964.
914.
883.
851.
1066.
734.
880.
827-
808.
749.
791 .
549.
683.
639-
619.
769.
852.
592.
742.
681 .
664.
942.
1046.
636.
837.
782.
745.
L.D
0
2
5
2
3
7
6
2
4
8
7
6
9
5
8
7
6
2
8
7
9
8
4
2
4
4
0
1
1
8
9
2
8
2
1
4
N
2
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
oxc
.62
.38
.16
.58
.48
.40
• 35
.77
.45
.80
.69
.63
.20
.10
.28
.66
.42
.43
.12
.38
.08
.47
-34
.28
.30
.70
.73
.63
.83
.75
.87
.65
.20
.40
.42
.34
r utL
ECON
7.
6.
9.
7.
8.
8.
6.
6.
10.
8.
8.
8.
8.
7.
11.
9.
9.
9.
8.
7.
12.
9.
10.
10.
9.
9.
14.
11.
12.
12.
7.
8.
13.
9-
10.
11.
1
3
8
8
3
6
7
6
0
0
3
7
7
3
1
2
6
9
7
8
3
4
2
6
6
7
4
0
0
4
8
0
3
9
4
7
G-5
-------
APPENDIX G.CONT'D
LISTING OF LOW SPEED CYCLE EMISSIONS AND FUEL
ECONOMY RESULTS ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES
DENVER
VEH
NO
035
036
037
038
039
040
YR MAKE MODL CID TEST TYPE
75 PLYM FURY 318 COLD TRNS1
COLD TRNS2
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 WEIGHTING
75 WEIGHTING
75 PLYM DUST 225 COLD TRNS1
COLD TRNS2
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 WEIGHTING
75 WEIGHTING
75 PONT CATA 400 COLD TRNS1
COLD TRNS2
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 WEIGHTING
75 WEIGHTING
75 PONT LEMA 350 COLD TRNS1
COLD TRNS2
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 WEIGHTING
75 WEIGHTING
75 PONT GRNV 455 COLD TRNS1
COLD TRNS2
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 WEIGHTING
75 WEIGHTING
76 CAPR SEDA 140 COLD TRNS1
COLD TRNS2
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 WEIGHTING
75 WEIGHTING
GRAMS PER MILE
HC CO C02 NOXC
8
4
1
3
3
2
9
4
1
2
3
2
10
6
1
1
4
2
47
7
2
2
11
6
19
3
0
2
4
2
7
7
2
1
4
3
.23
.24
.60
.24
.43
.76
.78
.34
.86
.83
.90
.96
.28
.75
.26
.83
.15
.64
.06
.76
.15
.93
.92
.53
.11
.50
.82
.20
.89
.89
.19
.28
.88
.09
.64
.22
236
89
26
44
79
53
1 16
93
48
68
71
62
102
64
13
20
41
27
448
69
24
40
115
67
88
36
11
30
31
24
58
162
83
17
95
73
.0
.5
.3
.9
.8
.6
.0
.4
.8
.2
.1
.9
.6
.1
.9
.4
.5
-3
.7
.7
.6
.7
.2
.3
.6
.0
.2
.4
.2
.2
.2
.4
.4
.5
.3
.4
816
1008
669
848
769
753
645
726
476
613
561
544
907
1072
705
928
822
806
666
900
613
761
684
677
929
1136
776
925
882
856
839
684
458
729
579
572
.6
.9
.6
.7
.6
.8
.7
.7
.1
.7
.7
.6
.1
• 3
.9
.0
.1
.9
.1
.3
.3
.6
.3
.9
.6
.5
.6
.7
.2
.3
.8
.0
.2
.8
.1
.6
1
2
1
2
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
3
1
1
2
2
2
1
1
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.16
.01
.70
.03
.66
.76
.23
.52
.35
.15
.55
.39
.41
.94
.99
.08
.25
.12
.45
.08
.72
.02
.9*
— A
.88
.12
.73
_ i.
.94
.89
n 0
.93
A 1
.92
.79
r O
.52
e 0
.52
62
. 0'
57
HPG
FUEL
ECOK
f
7
12
9
9
10
10
10
15
12
12
13
8
7
12
9
9
10
5
8
13
10
14
1
7
4 1
1 1
q
7
q
7
9
q
7
ill
I n
11
11
12
"
.6
,1
.5
.8
.5
•3
.0
.9
.2
.9
.6
.1
.1
.1
.2
.9
.3
.8
.6
/
.6
0
,0
.
.9
ll
f H
I
t 1
1
, 1
.1
.8
.3
.2
.8
.7
.9
.7
G-6
-------
APPENDIX G,CONT'D
LISTING OF LOW SPEED CYCLE EMISSIONS AND FUEL
ECONOMY RESULTS ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES
DENVER
VEH
N0 YR MAKE MODL
041 75 DATS B210
042 75 HOND SEDA
013 75 TOYO CORO
0*1 75 VOLK SEDA
Ol<5 75 VOLK STAW
076 72 AMMO GREM
CID
85
72
75
91
72
75
133
72
75
97
72
75
90
72
75
258
72
75
TEST TYPE
COLD TRNS1
COLD TRNS2
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
WEIGHTING
WEIGHTING
COLD TRNS1
COLD TRNS2
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
WEIGHTING
WEIGHTING
COLD TRNS1
COLD TRNS2
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
WEIGHTING
WEIGHTING
COLD TRNS1
COLD TRNS2
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
WEIGHTING
WEIGHTING
COLD TRNS1
COLD TRNS2
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
WEIGHTING
WEIGHTING
COLD TRNS1
COLD TRNS2
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
WEIGHTING
WEIGHTING
4
3
1
2
2
2
3
2
1
2
2
2
6
4
2
3
3
2
8
4
2
4
4
3
13
1
0
1
3
1
52
57
36
46
44
42
HC
.06
.24
.92
.57
.61
.37
.72
.67
.48
.53
.16
.01
.62
.04
.21
.24
.44
.97
.92
.22
.51
.01
.10
.54
.31
.70
.70
.39
• 32
.99
.87
.87
.37
.63
.09
.05
GRAMS PER MILE
CO C02
83
70
35
49
52
46
69
71
46
62
55
54
134
103
54
73
80
70
75
55
29
50
43
40
170
16
5
11
39
21
155
250
129
184
160
155
.4
.8
.6
.9
.2
.0
.4
.2
.2
.1
.9
.0
.9
.8
.5
.7
.3
.0
.9
.4
. 1
.3
.6
.2
.6
.9
.0
. 1
.2
.1
.6
.6
.4
.2
.1
.2
438
383
286
330
335
317
325
412
289
349
322
317
494
506
364
418
419
400
397
517
332
422
384
375
473
690
468
579
516
514
484
451
334
389
387
369
.5
.5
.2
.4
.9
.7
.4
.6
.7
.5
.6
.6
.4
.9
.5
.7
.5
.6
.3
.0
.7
.2
.1
.4
.2
.5
.9
.7
.7
.9
.5
.4
.1
.1
.7
.8
N
2
1
2
1
2
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
2
1
2
2
3
3
2
3
3
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
1
T
oxc
.52
.99
.15
.91
.18
.11
.23
.60
.71
.65
.79
.73
.78
.69
.85
.96
.40
.45
.57
.24
.82
.08
.05
.98
.60
.40
.49
.45
.68
.56
.62
.88
.57
.03
.43
.39
MPG
FUEL
ECON
15.2
17.6
25.5
21.3
20.8
22.3
19.9
16.7
24.2
19.5
21.3
21 .7
12.2
13.0
19.4
16.3
15.9
17.1
16.3
14.4
23-0
17.3
19.1
19.7
11.3
12.3
18.5
14.8
15.1
16.0
9.9
8.6
13-6
10.7
11.4
11.9
G-7
-------
APPENDIX G,CONT'D
LISTING OF LOW SPEED CYCLE EMISSIONS AND FUEL
ECONOMY RESULTS ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES
DENVER
VEH
NO YR MAKE
077 72 BUIC
078 72 CADI
079 72 CHEV
080 72 CHEV
081 72 CHEV
082 72 CHEV
MODL CID
RIVI 455
72
75
DEVI 472
72
75
VEGA 140
72
75
MALI 350
72
75
CHEL 350
72
75
NOVA 307
72
75
TEST TYPE
COLD TRNS1
COLD TRNS2
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
WEIGHTING
WEIGHTING
COLD TRNST
COLD TRNS2
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
WEIGHTING
WEIGHTING
COLD TRNS1
COLD TRNS2
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
WEIGHTING
WEIGHTING
COLD TRNS1
COLD TRNS2
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
WEIGHTING
WEIGHTING
COLD TRNS1
COLD TRNS2
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
WEIGHTING
WEIGHTING
COLD TRNS1
COLD TRNS2
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
WEIGHTING
WEIGHTING
H
40.
9.
6.
9-
13.
9.
11 .
9.
5.
8.
7.
7.
18.
8.
3-
5.
7-
5.
11 .
10.
6.
8.
7.
7-
9.
7-
3.
6.
5.
5.
13.
17.
9.
13-
Tt.
11.
C
76
96
02
20
49
96
26
93
66
67
64
20
52
13
44
94
32
68
13
46
07
19
97
37
67
35
98
2T
78
27
23
96
17
36
81
27
GRAMS
CO
399.
227 .
117.
t75.
194.
164.
313.
319.
168.
245-
228.
2T7.
153.
85.
52.
64.
78.
66.
148.
235.
123.
169.
T52.
146.
135.
151 .
68.
92.
98.
87.
125.
217.
106.
162.
133-
130.
PE
6 1
6 1
3
9
6
0
3 T
5 1
5
3
2
9
7
4
3
2
7
4
9
1
8
1
2
4
0
3
8
7
9
3
4
0
1
7
3
8
R MI
C02
028.
087.
707.
886.
849.
809.
137.
212.
780.
963.
940.
891 .
451.
622.
383.
475.
447.
432.
738.
774.
517.
662.
614.
592.
742.
91T.
612.
783-
701 .
689-
571.
674.
500.
580.
550.
540.
LE-
7
9
0
7
3
5
3
0
2
7
t
1
5
8
8
4
4
2
7
1
8
7
4
6
8
5
9
3
0
9
8
4
3
8
9
5
N
4
4
5
4
4
4
1
1
T
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
OXC
•03
• 31
• 30
.69
.85
.97
.41
.68
.27
.41
.38
.35
.00
.26
.64
.58
.44
.54
.70
.93
.48
.08
.41
.36
.44
.40
ii ii
.44
.57
h 1
.43
it C.
.4o
.91
0 O
.oj
' ]\
50
• & 7
ol
. J 1
MPG
FUEL
ECON
5.0
6.0
9.?
7.4
8J
5.3
5.1
8.3
6.4
6.7
7.1
11.8
11.3
18.6
11.9
11.9
16.0
8.8
7-5
12.1
9 A
.3
A A 1
10.1
t A C
10.5
9.0
19 1
12.1
9.1
to 1
|U- '
10.5
10-9
8.3
12.8
1 *•
10.1
II-1
G-8
-------
APPENDIX G.CONT'D
LISTING OF LOW SPEED CYCLE EMISSIONS AND FUEL
ECONOMY RESULTS ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES
DENVER
VEH
NO YR MAKE
083 72 CHEV
084 72 CHEV
085 72 DODG
086 72 FORD
°8? 72 FORD
088 72 FORD
MODL CID TEST TYPE
IMPA 350 COLD TRNS1
COLD TRNS2
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 WEIGHTING
75 WEIGHTING
BELA 400 COLD TRNS1
COLD TRNS2
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 WEIGHTING
75 WEIGHTING
CORO 318 COLD TRNS1
COLD TRNS2
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 WEIGHTING
75 WEIGHTING
PINT 122 COLD TRNS1
COLD TRNS2
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 WEIGHTING
75 WEIGHTING
GRNT 351 COLD TRNS1
COLD TRNS2
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 WEIGHTING
75 WEIGHTING
MAVE 200 COLD TRNS1
COLD TRNS2
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 WEIGHTING
75 WEIGHTING
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
3
0
6
9
9
8
5
4
8
2
3
1
0
6
4
6
5
5
1
0
5
7
7
6
1
7
4
5
6
5
1
6
3
5
5
5
HC
.69
.92
.82
.44
.00
.36
-78
.67
.46
.80
.09
.45
.41
.64
.01
.01
.79
.23
.64
.52
.28
.78
.61
.85
.17
.49
.13
.76
.19
• 39
.95
.30
.91
.21
.95
.09
GRAMS
\J 11 n i J o
CO
165.
228.
110.
155.
145.
135.
406.
222.
96.
140.
182.
143.
120.
96.
30.
58.
61.
50.
146.
134.
77.
98.
102.
93.
168.
152.
66.
95.
104.
89.
228.
139.
59.
74.
108.
84.
I
Z
0
3
2
6
7
9
7
9
0
4
3
3
1
6
4
0
6
2
1
8
5
9
8
3
5
0
9
0
3
4
4
4
6
1
8
1
3 P R M
. d n 11
CO
745
881
602
775
688
679
915
878
594
755
716
684
760
800
545
685
640
618
391
385
294
344
332
322
975
T060
704
887
831
801
539
586
413
532
474
467
II R
L> Ci
2
.0
.1
.4
.8
.8
.4
.6
.6
.9
.6
.4
.1
.2
.3
.4
.0
.5
.4
.6
.8
.6
.9
.5
.5
.4
.5
.4
.8
.7
.3
.4
.9
.8
.7
.5
.2
N
2
1
2
1
1
1
2
2
3
2
3
3
2
2
3
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
2
3
3
3
3
2
1
3
2
3
3
oxc
.39
.52
.03
.69
.99
.93
.49
.48
.59
.60
.14
.17
.70
.20
.73
.72
.21
.28
.51
.31
.22
.33
.30
.28
.65
.94
.15
.57
.01
.19
.64
.90
.64
.86
.08
.22
MPG
I? IT C1 1
r U CiL
ECON
8.5
7.0
11.1
8.5
9.4
9.7
5.4
7.0
1 1 .5
8.7
8.5
9.4
9.0
9.1
14.6
11 .2
11 .7
12.4
13.5
14.1
20.5
16.9
17.1
18.1
7.0
6.7
10.8
8.4
8.7
9.3
9.5
10.7
17.1
13.3
13.4
14.4
G-9
-------
APPENDIX G,CONT'D
LISTING OF
ECONOMY
LOW SPEED CYCLE EMISSIONS AND FUEL
RESULTS ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES
DENVER
VEH
NO YR MAKE MODL
CID TEST TYPE
GRAMS PER MILE
HC CO C02 NOXC ECOH
089 72 FORD GALA
090 72 FORD STAW
091 72 MERC MONG
092 72 OLDS CUTL
093 72 PLYM VALI
094 72 PLYM FURY
351
72
75
400
72
75
400
72
75
350
72
75
225
72
75
360
72
75
COLD TRNS1
COLD TRNS2
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
WEIGHTING
WEIGHTING
COLD TRNS1
COLD TRNS2
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
WEIGHTING
WEIGHTING
COLD TRNS1
COLD TRNS2
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
WEIGHTING
WEIGHTING
COLD TRNS1
COLD TRNS2
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
WEIGHTING
WEIGHTING
COLD TRNS1
COLD TRNS2
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
WEIGHTING
WEIGHTING
COLD TRNS1
COLD TRNS2
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
WEIGHTING
WEIGHTING
16
7
4
12
7
7
TO
8
4
7
6
6
10
5
5
6
6
6
22
10
6
8
10
8
43
32
16
23
24
21
15
13
6
8
9
8
.58
.96
.24
.97
-39
.60
.58
.92
.58
.85
.65
.22
.88
.90
.22
.40
.44
.02
.72
.99
.06
.49
.29
.44
.81
.18
.20
.99
.87
.72
.40
.15
.40
.86
.55
• 32
181
181
67
132
113
102
128
211
85
130
120
1TO
204
52
64
55
88
72
364
299
164
224
231
207
392
384
194
289
272
249
344
373
169
253
246
22 T
.8
.4
.4
.2
.5
.T
.4
.2
.6
.6
.4
.9
.8
.1
.t
.0
.4
.5
• 3
.4
.5
.8
.3
.1
.0
.5
.2
.5
.4
.7
.6
.6
.5
.7
.3
.8
877
1079
699
913
814
798
1001
814
628
752
739
704
945
1209
801
992
915
894
669
760
499
610
587
563
352
395
285
336
321
313
783
815
553
726
653
636
.1
.1
.6
.8
.1
.1
.9
.5
.1
.8
.1
.5
.8
.7
.8
.6
.8
.7
.8
.0
.7
.9
.4
.0
.8
.7
.7
.7
.8
.0
.3
.8
.4
.7
.0
.1
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
2
4
3
3
3
2
1
4
4
4
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
1
1
1
2
1
2
.86
• 31
.64
.57
.61
.61
.29
.70
.03
.52
.80
.81
.82
.60
.72
.83
.33
.58
.89
.08
.00
.85
.99
.96
.51
.75
. f
.26
.79
f\ A
.01
/\ c
.05
.75
in
.0?
oO
. JJ
OQ
.93
no
. «/
1 3
. 1 J
1,]
1 ' J
6J
10.8
7.6
8.7
9.0
7.2
7.6
11.1
9.0
9-3
9-5
6.8
6.8
9.1
8.1
8.3
8.6
6.8
7-0
tt L
11.*
9.0
9ft
.0
91
.1
8.0
0 1
0. 1
n 8
1 j.°
m ?
10.'
to 7
|U'I
11 5
1 1 •'
6.5
6-1
io.f
7-7
8.3
8.8
G-10
-------
APPENDIX G,CONT'D
LISTING OF LOW SPEED CYCLE EMISSIONS AND FUEL
ECONOMY RESULTS ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES
DENVER
VEH
N0 YR MAKE MODL
095 72 PONT CATA
U 7 J '
096 72 PONT LEMA
097 72 DATS 510
CID
400
72
75
350
72
75
97
72
75
TEST TYPE
COLD TRNS1
COLD TRNS2
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
WEIGHTING
WEIGHTING
COLD TRNS1
COLD TRNS2
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
WEIGHTING
WEIGHTING
COLD TRNS1
COLD TRNS2
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
WEIGHTING
WEIGHTING
21
12
6
10
10
9
10
9
5
8
7
6
8
10
3
8
6
5
HC
.43
.72
.89
. 12
.91
.36
.39
.05
.67
.14
.29
.93
• 33
.42
.85
.50
.10
.88
GRAMS PER MILE
CO C02
354
278
115
165
195
16T
165
177
TtO
139
135
127
72
82
36
65
53
50
.6
.8
.1
.6
.6
.3
.7
.1
.2
.8
.0
.7
.9
.8
.7
.2
.4
.4
875
1020
638
804
764
730
840
927
597
779
713
689
405
412
306
349
347
334
.2
.3
.2
.3
.6
.7
.0
.4
.1
.5
.6
.T
.7
.5
.3
.1
.8
.0
NOXC
1
2
3
2
2
2
2
T
1
T
T
1
T
1
2
1
1
7
-34
.11
.03
.52
.51
.69
.07
.57
.53
-47
.65
.57
.84
.76
.00
.88
.92
.94
MPG
FUEL
ECON
5.9
5.9
10.6
8.1
8.0
8.8
7.8
7.2
11.3
8.7
9.4
9.7
16.2
15.4
23.6
18.5
19.7
20.5
09872 TOYO CORO 120 COLD TRNST
COLD TRNS2
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 WEIGHTING
75 WEIGHTING
72 VOLK KARM 97 COLD TRNS1
COLD TRNS2
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 WEIGHTING
75 WEIGHTING
KOMB 103 COLD TRNST
COLD TRNS2
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 WEIGHTING
75 WEIGHTING
100 72
8
5
2
7
4
4
10
5
3
5
5
4
17
11
5
8
9
7
.19
.00
.86
.40
.33
,54
.30
.99
.1 1
.74
.10
.57
.70
.78
.45
.5^0
.13
.73
50
58
39
45
45
43
84
91
50
77
65
63
117
109
56
94
79
75
.7
.4
.3
.4
.5
.4
.5
.5
.8
.5
.9
.4
.1
.3
.4
.8
.3
.1
407
488
322
402
374
363
353
432
299
376
338
334
505
618
410
545
472
468
.9
.4
.6
.9
.1
.2
.3
.0
.9
.6
.2
.0
.0
.5
.4
.9
.6
.3
3
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
T
T
1
.69
.51
.31
.65
.62
.52
.79
.24
.25
.06
• 35
.25
.87
.69
.64
.64
.69
.66
1
1
7.
4.
22.
t
1
1
T
1
7.
9.
9.
7.
4.
22.
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
7.
9.
9.
1 .
0.
7.
2.
4.
4.
3
9
6
8
3
9
1
9
8
2
4
8
9
7
2
3
2
5
G-ll
-------
G-12
-------
APPENDIX H
-------
APPENDIX H - LISTING OF HIGH SPEED CYCLE EMISSIONS AND
FUEL ECONOMY RESULTS ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES
Legend
VEH NO - Vehicle Number
YR - Model Year
MARE - Vehicle Make
MODL - Vehicle Model
CID - Engine Displacement in Cubic Inches
TEST TYPE - Indicates the Portion of the Test or Composite
COLD TRANS - Cold transient portion of test (520 sec-
3.835 miles)
COLD STAB - Cold stabilized portion of test (878 sec-
9.773 miles)
HOT TRANS - Hot transient portion of test (520 sec-
3.835 miles)
72 WEIGHTING - Composite of cold transient and Cold Stabil-
ized portions (uses same methods as 1972
Federal Test Procedure)
75 WEIGHTING - Composite of Total Test using same methods
of calculation as 1975 Federal Test Procedure.
HC - Hydrocarbon Emissions in grams per mile
CO - Carbon Monoxide Emissions in grams per mile
€02 - Carbon Dioxide Emission in grams per mile
NOXC - Oxides of Nitrogen Emissions Corrected for Humidity in grams
per mile
ECON - Fuel Economy Calculated by the Carbon Balance Method in miles
per gallon
H-l
-------
APPENDIX H
LISTING OF HIGH SPEED CYCLE EMISSIONS AND FUEL
ECONOMY RESULTS ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES
DENVER
VEH
NO YR MAKE MODL CID TEST TYPE
GRAMS
HC CO
PER MILE
002 NOXC ECOH
011 75
012 75
013 75
014 75
015 75
016 75
017 75
AMMO HORN 258 COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 WEIGHTING
75 WEIGHTING
BUIC CNTY 350 COLD' TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 WEIGHTING
75 WEIGHTING
BUIC RIVI 455 COLD TRANS
COLD. STAB
HOT TRANS
72 WEIGHTING
75 WEIGHTING
BUIC REGA 350 COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 WEIGHTING
75 WEIGHTING
CADI ELDO 500 COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 WEIGHTING
75 WEIGHTING
CHEV VEGA 140 COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 WEIGHTING
75 WEIGHTING
CHEV NOVA 250 COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 WEIGHTING
75 WEIGHTING
2
T
t
1
1
3
0
1
1
1
3
1
2
T
1
3
t
2
1
T
7
4
6
5
5
2
0
0
1
0
2
0
0
0
0
.89
.02
.93
.55
.40
.T6
.77
-37
.44
.T6
.05
.06
.70
.62
.56
.48
.35
.1 T
.95
.73
.56
.45
.49
.32
.15
.30
.58
.99
.07
.86
.30
.26
.97
.83
.62
64
8
11
24
15
77
30
33
43
36
6t
34
59
42
41
76
44
52
53
49
180
147
162
156
t53
49
17
24
26
22
39
7
9
16
TT
.1
.8
.2
.4
.9
.0
.8
.6
.8
.8
.0
.7
.0
.1
.8
.9
.5
.8
.6
.7
.5
.3
.6
.7
.8
.7
.1
.2
.3
.2
.1
.0
.2
.0
.2
425
365
396
382
377
516
433
472
456
449
667
538
562
574
558
537
427
466
458
447
598
486
515
517
504
320
253
289
272
267
460
394
431
4T3
408
.0
.7
.2
.4
.8
.2
.0
.0
.4
.3
.3
.7
.3
.9
.1
.8
.7
.4
.8
.3
.7
.1
.2
.8
.4
.3
.5
.9
.4
.5
.9
.5
.4
.2
.4
3
3
l»
3
3
1
1
1
1
1
3
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
T
1
0
0
1
0
0
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
.28
.71
.05
.59
.71
.65
.11
.03
.27
.17
.10
.66
• 32
.07
.78
.3^
.10
.05
.17
.12
.86
.99
.12
.95
.99
.90
.90
_. f
.56
A rt
.90
O r
.85
.08
1 3
. 1 3
f\ A
.20
1 1
. i '
1 3
. i •>
16
23
21
20
21
13
18
16
16
17
11
11
13
13
11
13
17
16
16
16
9
12
11
It
1
It
1
21
11
3'
ofi
20
?8
cO
90
C7
16
21
£> '
10
1 7
20
20
.6
.2
.1
.9
.8
.7
• 3
.8
.8
.i|
.5
.9
.1
.7
.1
.3
.?
.0
.2
.7
.8
.1
ii
,1
(
,0
.9
ii
, i
8
, V
.0
.1
.8
.8
.8
.1
.7
H-2
-------
APPENDIX H,CONT'D
LISTING OF
ECONOMY
HIGH SPEED
RESULTS ON
CYCLE EMISSIONS AND FUEL
INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES
DENVER
MPG
VEH
N0 YR MAKE MODL
Oi8 75 CHEV MONT
V I v i *
019 75 CHEV CAPR
020 75 CHEV IMPA
021 75 CHEV STAW
°22 75 CHRY NEWP
\
023 75 DODG CORO
024 75 DODG DART
CID TEST TYPE
350 COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 WEIGHTING
75 WEIGHTING
350 COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 WEIGHTING
75 WEIGHTING
350 COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 WEIGHTING
75 WEIGHTING
400 COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 WEIGHTING
75 WEIGHTING
400 COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 WEIGHTING
75 WEIGHTING
318 COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 WEIGHTING
75 WEIGHTING
225 COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
, 72 WEIGHTING
75 WEIGHTING
HC
2.83
0.57
0.94
1 .21
0.91
3.51
1 .09
1 .60
1 .78
1 .47
2.68
0.91
1.10
1.41
1.T5
2.71
0.47
2.52
1 .10
1 .07
2.03
0.36
0.56
0.83
0.59
3.58
0.55
1 .47
1 .40
1.06
4.56
2.18
3.76
2.8S
2.72
j rv rt n v-> r
CO
68.7
27. 1
35.2
38.8
33-5
74.4
40.7
53.2
50.2
46.8
90.0
47.5
47.9
59.5
52.7
71 .0
31.5
34.5
42.6
36.8
24 .0
16.3
14.5
18.4
16.9
58.7
10.7
22.8
24.2
18.5
70.9
53.4
64.3
58.3
57.3
£> n n J. ij a
C02
520.0
443.5
474.0
465.1
457.7
570.1
459.6
500.4
490.8
479.6
564.3
468.7
518.8
495.7
488.3
761.9
629.4
675.9
666.8
653.0
744.6
581 .1
639.2
627.2
6T0.2
515-0
454.0
463-8
47T.2
463.0
379.9
3T3.7
318.0
332.4
322.4
NOXC ECON
1.62 13.9
T.42 18.2
1.16 16.7
1.48 16.7
1.41 17.3
1.56 12.7
1 .21 16.8
0.96 15. 1
1 .31 15.4
1 .22 T5.9
1 .49 12.4
1 .54 16.2
1 .12 14.9
1 .52 15.0
1 .46 15.4
T.52 10.1
1.74 13.0
1.45 T2.0
1 .68 12.0
1.67 12.4
3.71 11.3
2.61 14.6
2.44 13-4
2.92 13.5
2.72 t3.9
2.62 t4.3
2.79 T8.8
3.15 17.6
2.74 17.3
2.83 17.9
3.17 17.5
2.24 21 .9
2.11 20.6
2.51 20.5
2.34 21 .1
H-3
-------
APPENDIX H,CONT'D
LISTING OF HIGH SPEED CYCLE EMISSIONS AND FUEL
ECONOMY RESULTS ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES
DENVER
VEH
NO YR
025 75
026 75
027 75
028 75
029 75
030 75
031 75
MAKE MODL CID TEST TYPE
FORD MUST 140 COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 WEIGHTING
75 WEIGHTING
FORD TORI 351 COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 WEIGHTING
75 WEIGHTING
FORD GRAN 250 COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 WEIGHTING
75 WEIGHTING
FORD LTD 351 COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 WEIGHTING
75 WEIGHTING
FORD LTD 400 COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 WEIGHTING
75 WEIGHTING
MERC MARQ 400 COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 WEIGHTING
75 WEIGHTING
MERC MONG 351 COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 WEIGHTING
75 WEIGHTING
-
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
2
0
1
1
1
5
0
1
2
1
3
2
3
2
2
1
0
1
0
0
C
HC
.98
.33
.45
.52
.43
.76
.64
.86
.96
.97
.23
.19
.04
.48
.45
.15
.94
.62
.28
.19
.85
.53
.83
.03
.38
.66
.04
.52
.50
.48
.63
.65
.44
.93
.90
JRAM
C<
16
7
7
10
8
24
13
24
16
16
20
5
8
10
8
38
22
28
27
25
61
27
38
37
33
75
57
76
62
62
41
23
29
28
26
S P
0
.4
.7
.2
.2
.7
.9
.4
.7
.6
.6
.6
.9
.0
.1
.0
.5
.6
.3
.1
.4
.6
.8
.7
• 3
.7
.3
.0
.8
.1
.4
.9
.0
.6
.3
.3
ER M
CO
408
335
376
355
350
614
504
536
535
522
565
464
507
493
483
666
517
572
559
544
694
562
594
599
583
681
524
578
568
552
597
503
537
530
520
ILE
2
.1
.0
.5
.6
.5
.5
.3
.9
.4
.9
.8
.6
.8
.1
.8
.9
.5
.2
.6
.4
.0
.1
.6
.3
.3
.6
.4
.6
.7
.2
.3
.6
.9
.0
.5
N
0
1
0
0
T
3
2
2
2
2
1
T
1
1
1
2
3
2
3
3
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
oxc
.80
.OH
.96
.98
.00
• 35
.49
.59
.73
.61
.43
.10
.15
.20
.15
.19
.21
.52
.02
.03
.71
.52
.52
.57
.55
.21
.17
+
.06
* 0
.1°
4 C
.15
.08
76
. i °
on
.29
en
.57
60
. 0v
H
FU
EC
20
25
22
23
21
13
16
15
15
16
11
18
IT
17
17
12
16
11
11
15
11
11
13
1 1
13
to
1 ii
11
4 1
12
1 1
u
13
I j
13
16
15
1 J
15
1 J
15
PG
EL
Oil
•> •
A
1 J
5
• J
.8
.8
.3
.5
.8
.3
.7
.1
.?
.?
.0
,\
.8
.1
.0
.3
,6
.1
.0
/
.0
it
.1
N
,H
o
.7
.9
i
•j
t
.3
2
, ft
5
* /
.3
.1
.1
,\
.7
H-4
-------
APPENDIX H.CONT'D
LISTING OF HIGH SPEED CYCLE EMISSIONS AND FUEL
ECONOMY RESULTS ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES
DENVER
MPG
VEH
N0 YR MAKE MODL
0« 75 OLDS DELT
y j i- i *
033 75 OLDS CUTL
031 75 OLDS DELT
035 75 PLYM FURY
°36 75 PLYM DUST
°37 75 PONT CATA
038 75 PONT LEMA
CID TEST TYPE
350 COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 WEIGHTING
75 WEIGHTING
350 COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 WEIGHTING
75 WEIGHTING
455 COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 WEIGHTING
75 WEIGHTING
318 COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 WEIGHTING
75 WEIGHTING
225 COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 WEIGHTING
75 WEIGHTING
400 COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 WEIGHTING
75 WEIGHTING
350 COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
. 72 WEIGHTING
75 WEIGHTING
HC
4.81
2.05
2.98
2.83
2.53
3-80
1 .96
2.72
2.48
2.31
2.16
0.75
1 .69
1 .15
1 .07
1 .54
0.32
1 .69
0.67
0.69
4.14
1 .38
3.09
2.16
1.99
2.58
0.45
0.82
1 .05
0.76
6.69
1 .00
3.18
2.60
2.04
\j n n « o r
CO
100 .7
66.8
86.3
76.3
74.0
69.1
55.5
62.2
59.3
58.2
34.0
19.6
38.5
23.7
24.4
33.4
8.6
24.5
15.6
14.2
34.4
28.1
39.0
29-9
30.6
43.5
12.8
14.4
21 .4
T6.8
95.7
32.6
42.2
50.4
41 .8
LJ 11 1 IX l-i LJ
C02
471 .6
409.2
427 .6
426.8
419.7
515.4
405.7
434.9
436.6
423.7
607.6
470.5
492.2
509.1
490.6
562.7
438.8
493.8
473.7
462.6
424.8
296.2
329.5
332.4
3T7.1
636.5
474.8
518.0
520.4
501.3
526.9
460.7
478.8
479.4
471.6
NOXC ECON
1 .52 13-8
1 .54 17.0
1 .41 15.5
1 .54 16.0
1 .52 16.3
T. 15 14.0
0.99 17.8
0.86 T6.4
T.04 16.5
0.99 17.0
1 .58 13.3
1 .39 17.6
1.27 15.9
1 .44 16.1
1 .39 16.7
2.42 14.3
2.08 19.6
2.06 16.5
2.17 T7.7
2.11 18.2
T .85 18.0
1.38 25.7
1 .43 22.2
1 .51 23-0
1 .44 23.9
3.33 12.4
3-76 17.9
3.18 16.3
3.64 15.9
3.61 T6.7
1 .53 12.7
1 .18 17.2
1 .20 T6.0
1.28 T5.7
T.23 T6.3
H-5
-------
APPENDIX H.CONT'D
LISTING OF HIGH SPEED CYCLE EMISSIONS AND FUEL
ECONOMY RESULTS ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES
DENVER
VEH
NO YR
039 75
040 76
041 75
042 75
043 75
044 75
045 75
MAKE MODL CID TEST TYPE
PONT GRNV 455 COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 WEIGHTING
75 WEIGHTING
CAPR SEDA 140 COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 WEIGHTING
75 WEIGHTING
DATS B210 85 COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 WEIGHTING
75 WEIGHTING
HOND SEDA 91 COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 WEIGHTING
75 WEIGHTING
TOYO CORO T33 COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 WEIGHTING
75 WEIGHTING
VOLK SEDA 97 COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 WEIGHTING
75 WEIGHTING
VOLK STAW 90 COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 WEIGHTING
75 WEIGHTING
GRAMS PER MILE pjjjf
HC CO C02 NOXC ECON
3.14
0.71
1 .89
1 .40
1 .20
3.63
2.60
2.56
2.90
2.72
2.32
1 .23
1 .70
1.54
1 .44
2.20
0.99
1 .61
1.33
1 .24
2.61
t .00
1 .53
1.45
1.28
3-76
1 .69
2.22
2.27
2.03
3-34
0.53
1 .24
1.32
0.99
74.4
38.0
56.6
48.2
45.4
75.0
78.4
67.4
77.5
76.2
53.8
31 .4
32.6
37.8
34.3
52.4
3-7
45.7
17.4
16.3
43.3
21.3
2T.O
27-5
23.9
35.0
14.3
20.8
20.1
17.9
51.9
9.0
11.3
21 .1
14.6
669.3
527.4
569.5
567.4
551.3
414.0
247.8
328.0
294.6
280.8
283.6
236.5
240.8
249.7
242.9
246.1
204.2
231-0
216.0
213-6
371.5
306.0
3T9-6
324.4
316.1
270.2
224.8
241.7
237-6
233-0
372.4
323-0
358.9
336.9
334.7
0-97 11,1
1-36 15.1
1.00 13.11
t-25 13.?
1.26 )i|. 2
0.43 16.3
0.16 23.4
0.45 20.1
0.15 20.9
0.45 21.7
2.23 23.6
2.24 30.6
2.05 29.8
2.24 28.3
2.21 29-1
1.16 26.5
1.33 11-6
1.09 28.8
1.28 35-8
1.27 36-5
4.57 19-8
6.14 25-9
* _ i, n
4.62 21.8
. _ A 0
5.69 23-8
_ rt h D
5.70 21.1'
2.58 26.3
A t OC I
3.26 3?-1
_ „« 11 5
2.70 ji-'
nl 991
3.07 y-
- r\Q 11.2
3 .09 J3
1.92t9'J
1 08 26.2
1 ' " « i
4 OK 23-3
1 -95 , 7
« ofi 23-'
1 -9° : t
« Q7 21-11
T .7 '
H-6
-------
APPENDIX H,CONT'D
LISTING OF HIGH SPEED CYCLE EMISSIONS AND FUEL
ECONOMY RESULTS ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES
DENVER
VEH
N0 YR MAKE MODL
076 72 AMMO GREM
VI** '
077 72 BUIC RIVI
078 72 CADI DEVI
079 72 CHEV VEGA
080 72 CHEV MALI
081 72 CHEV CHEL
082 72 CHEV NOVA
CID
258
72
75
455
72
75
472
72
75
140
72
75
350
72
75
350
72
75
307
. 72
75
TEST TYPE
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
WEIGHTING
WEIGHTING
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
WEIGHTING
WEIGHTING
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
WEIGHTING
WEIGHTING
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
WEIGHTING
WEIGHTING
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
WEIGHTING
WEIGHTING
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
WEIGHTING
WEIGHTING
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
WEIGHTING
WEIGHTING
33
24
27
26
25
7
2
4
3
3
4
2
3
2
2
5
2
3
3
2
5
3
3
3
3
4
2
3
2
2
9
4
7
5
5
HC
.70
.30
.65
.95
.97
.10
.72
.24
.96
.50
.87
.04
.91
.84
.69
.43
.09
.06
.03
.65
.34
.07
.97
.7T
.49
.37
.28
.09
.87
.66
.30
.43
.80
. 8-0
.56
GRAMS P
CO
101
72
89
80
78
T04
28
47
50
41
147
66
105
88
82
62
40
42
46
43
73
43
62
52
50
61
39
43
45
43
72
44
56
52
49
.9
.7
.4
.9
.9
.9
.8
.6
.3
.1
.4
.0
.7
.9
.2
.0
.1
.1
.3
.1
.0
.8
.2
.0
.3
.6
.8
.3
.9
.0
.2
.3
.4
.2
.6
ER MILE
C02
332
271
276
288
279
652
509
559
549
534
733
597
597
635
613
316
242
284
263
258
469
369
398
397
386
500
398
447
427
4T8
49T
410
424
433
422
.3
.4
.9
.5
.6
.4
.2
.5
.6
.6
.5
.6
.0
.9
• 9
.6
.3
.2
.3
.0
.8
.4
.3
.7
.2
.5
.4
.1
.2
.6
.9
.2
.0
.2
.3
NOXC
2
2
2
2
2
6
7
7
7
7
1
1
1
T
1
2
2
2
2
2
4
4
4
4
4
2
1
1
1
T
3
4
3
3
3
.57
.76
.22
.71
.65
.38
.50
.24
.19
.32
.66
.87
.64
.81
.80
.21
.32
.21
.29
.29
.37
.67
.02
.59
.53
.08
.81
.92
.88
.86
.44
.07
.55
.89
• 9T
MPG
FUEL
ECON
14.8
19.2
17-6
17.7
18.3
TO. 6
15.8
13.7
13.8
14.5
9.1
12.5
11.4
11-3
11.8
20.6
28.4
24.6
25.7
26.6
14.8
19.8
17.5
18.1
18.6
14.5
19.0
16.9
17.5
17.9
14.0
18.0
16.5
T6.6
17. 1
H-7
-------
APPENDIX H.CONT'D
LISTING OF
ECONOMY
HIGH SPEED
RESULTS ON
CYCLE EMISSIONS AND FUEL
INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES
DENVER
VEH
NO YR MAKE MODL
083 72 CHEV IMPA
084 72 CHEV BELA
085 72 DODG CORO
086 72 FORD PINT
087 72 FORD GRNT
088 72 FORD MAVE
089 72 FORD GALA
CID TEST TYPE
350 COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 WEIGHTING
75 WEIGHTING
400 COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 WEIGHTING
75 WEIGHTING
318 COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 WEIGHTING
75 WEIGHTING
122 COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 WEIGHTING
75 WEIGHTING
351 COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 WEIGHTING
75 WEIGHTING
200 COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 WEIGHTING
75 WEIGHTING
351 COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 WEIGHTING
75 WEIGHTING
GRAMS P
HC CO
10.77
5.69
6.95
7.T2
6.51
8.79
3.83
6.01
5.23
4.78
5.68
2.96
4.25
3-72
3.50
5.06
2.25
3.79
3.04
2.84
5.50
2.68
4.36
3.48
3.29
5.17
2 .65
3.66
3.36
3.T1
5.49
2.4T
6.29
3.27
3.40
155.3
107.8
105.1
121 .2
1T3.T
132.1
57.5
66.6
78.6
68.0
6T.2
26.6
33.1
36.4
31.9
73-9
47 .0
49.5
54.6
50.6
76.9
32.8
53.9
45.2
41.5
83-0
33-2
41 .2
47.3
40.5
67.8
21 .9
48.1
34.8
31.7
ER MILE PJ[[
002 NOXC ECON
588.7
444.2
467.3
484.9
465.4
542.7
435.4
481 .7
465.7
455.8
473.4
373.6
422.4
401 .7
393.5
286.5
238.6
246.4
252.1
245.6
582.5
454.2
506.6
490.4
478.2
360.6
298.5
324.2
316.0
310.2
610.1
462.7
514.3
504.3
488.9
2-23 10.2
2-5? H.i
2-18 13.6
2.17 12.?
2.16 13-it
3.51 1U
5.17 16.5
1.61 1i).|
1.91 11.7
5.09 15.1
3.98 15.1
1.92 20.9
1.16 18.2
1.65 18.9
1.73 19.5
1.8t 21.2
1.78 27.8
4.38 26.1
1.79 25.5
1.72 26.6
3.95 12-3
1.70 17-3
1.19 H-f
1.19 15-5
— * t ft
4.57 1o-°
4.71 17-5
- - — A)I f
6.17 21.1
„. n^ 5
5.30 2<:.<;
— f f\*i 1
5.76 22.
r QC 93.1
5 .03 "
3.60 12-'
I 09 tf.'
11 '22 1!
ii 11 1M
I."' i
I n<5 15-6
11 -05 \i i
n t3 tO-'
1 . i j
H-8
-------
APPENDIX H,CONT'D
LISTING OF HIGH SPEED CYCLE EMISSIONS AND FUEL
ECONOMY RESULTS ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES
DENVER
MPG
VEH
N0 YR MAKE
OQO 72 FORD
y j v 1 •*
091 72 MERC
092 72 OLDS
093 72 PLYM
091 72 PLYM
°95 72 PONT
096 72 PONT
MODL CID TEST TYPE
STAW 400 COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 WEIGHTING
75 WEIGHTING
MONG 400 COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 WEIGHTING
75 WEIGHTING
CUTL 350 COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 WEIGHTING
75 WEIGHTING
VALI 225 COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 WEIGHTING
75 WEIGHTING
FURY 360 COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 WEIGHTING
75 WEIGHTING
CATA 400 COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
72 WEIGHTING
75 WEIGHTING
LEMA 350 COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
. 72 WEIGHTING
75 WEIGHTING
4
2
4
3
3
4
3
4
3
3
6
3
5
4
4
15
5
9
8
7
6
3
3
4
3
9
4
5
5
4
5
3
4
3
3
HC
.73
.80
.47
.34
.30
.71
.22
.47
.64
.60
.39
.62
.00
.40
.T8
.10
.65
.68
• 32
.44
.49
.49
.98
• 34
.94
.38
.03
.83
.54
.97
.46
.38
.08
. 9-7
.75
CO C02 NOXC
t
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
77
43
48
52
48
74
40
48
49
45
12
74
06
85
84
79
02
32
24
16
26
62
72
80
71
42
48
69
75
63
84
52
63
61
57
.4
.2
.1
.8
.1
.1
.4
.8
.9
.8
.6
.5
.4
.2
.2
.7
.5
.6
.3
.7
.3
.5
.8
.5
.9
.8
.9
.9
.4
.6
.6
.2
.5
.3
.9
596
480
495
512
496
628
537
576
563
554
480
356
390
391
376
282
255
258
263
259
535
411
473
446
436
564
459
494
489
477
547
412
460
450
436
.0
.0
.7
.7
.6
.7
.5
.9
.2
.9
.3
.1
.4
.1
.7
.4
.4
.2
.0
. 1
.4
.7
.9
.5
.6
.3
.4
.0
.0
.7
.1
.8
.7
.7
.8
5
5
5
5
5
5
7
6
6
6
1
1
1
T
1
1
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
3
2
3
3
3
3
2
3
2
3
3
.41
.55
.61
.51
.54
.87
.04
.77
.71
.86
.63
.70
.36
.68
.64
.51
.80
.23
.44
.55
.25
.83
.37
.67
.69
.15
.89
.28
.40
.58
.56
.48
.29
.22
.T8
r u CiL>
ECON
12.1
15.9
15.2
14.6
15.2
11 .7
14.5
13.3
13.6
13-9
13.1
18.3
15.5
16.5
17.0
14.5
20.4
17.8
18.3
19.0
11.8
17.0
14.8
15.1
15.8
10.8
16.2
14.3
14.2
15.0
T2.7
T7.6
15.5
15.9
16.4
H-9
-------
APPENDIX H.CONT'D
LISTING OF
ECONOMY
HIGH SPEED
RESULTS ON
CYCLE EMISSIONS AND FUEL
INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES
DENVER
VEH
NO YR MAKE MODL CID TEST TYPE
GRAMS
HC CO
PER MILE
WPG
FUEL
002 NOXC BCOI
097 72 DATS 510
098 '72 TOYO CORO
099 72 VOLK KARM
100 72 VOLK KOMB
97
72
75
120
72
75
97
72
75
103
72
75
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
WEIGHTING
WEIGHTING
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
WEIGHTING
WEIGHTING
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
WEIGHTING
WEIGHTING
COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
HOT TRANS
WEIGHTING
WEIGHTING
4
2
4
2
2
3
1
3
2
2
4
T
2
2
2
9
2
5
U
3
.19
.01
.80
.62
.72
.22
.62
.76
.07
.T6
.11
.75
.54
.41
.16
.18
.58
.39
.44
.83
48
15
27
24
21
31
21
25
24
23
50
36
45
40
39
60
30
53
39
37
.0
.6
.4
.7
.4
.4
.6
.9
.3
.4
.7
.4
.8
.4
.6
.8
.7
.1
.1
.9
300
243
244
259
250
294
233
259
250
245
238
204
221
213
211
376
292
317
315
306
.2
.2
.8
.2
.3
.7
.4
.6
.7
.0
.1
.2
.2
.7
.0
.0
.3
.0
.8
.H
2
3
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
3
1
T
T
1
1
2
2
1
2
2
.47
.15
.56
.96
.97
.61
.71
.68
.68
.69
.81
.72
.33
.75
.67
.35
.30
.86
.31
.24
22,8
32.4
29.3
29.0
30.3
25.1
32.6
28.1
30.0
30.7
26.8
33-3
29.5
31.2
31.T
17.7
25-5
21.3
22.7
23-5
H-10
-------
APPENDIX I
-------
APPENDIX I - LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE,
FEDERAL SHORT TEST, AND FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST EMISSION
RESULTS ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES
VEHICLE NUMBER - Vehicle Number
YEAR - Model Year
MAKE - Vehicle Make
MODEL - Vehicle Model
CID - Engine Displacement in Cubic Inches
TEST TYPE - This is a heading to identify the results being listed
FTP - 1975 Federal Test Procedure composite
SHORT TEST - Results of Federal Short Cycle Test
3 MODE - Results of Federal Three Mode Test
TEST M9DE - Identifies the mode of the Three Mode Test being listed
as shown in the table below
RLHP - Dyno load used in test, FTP and Short Test are as specified
for the Federal Test Procedure; 3 Mode is as specified in the
table below
HC - Hydrocarbon Emissions; grams per mile for FTP and Short
Test; PPM for 3 Mode
CO - Carbon Monoxide Emissions; grams per mile for FTP and
Short Test; Per Cent for 3 Mode
C02 - Carbon Dioxide Emission in grams per mile
NOXC - Oxides of Nitrogen Emissions; grams per mile corrected for
Humidity for FTP and Short Test; PPM for 3 Mode
TIME TO
ABILIZE - The time required to obtain a stable emission reading after
the dynomometer load has been set in each mode of the
Federal Three Mode Test (0: measurement not taken)
I-I
-------
Vehicle
Weight
up to 2500
2501-3500
3501-4500
above 4500
High Spaad (50 MPH)
Actual Load
21
26
31
36
Transmission
High
High
High
High
Low Spaad
Actual Load
9
12
15
18
• — ^
(30 MPH)
— .
Transmission
3rd
High
High
High
Idle Mode: Automatic Transmission in Neutral and Drive
: Manual Transmission in Neutral
1-2
-------
APPENDIX I
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE, FEDERAL SHORT TEST, AND Fl
THREE MODE TEST EMISSION RESULTS ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES
FEDERAL
DENVER
W75
AMMO
015
1975 CADI
016
1975 CHEV
017
1975
CHEV
018
1975
CHEV
019
1975 CHEV
021
1975
DODG
025
1975 FORD
02?
t975 FORD
032
1975 OLDS
MODEL
HORN
ELDO
VEGA
NOVA
MONT
CAPR
DART
MUST
GRAN
DSLT
CID
258
500
140
250
350
350
225
140
250
350
TEST TYPE
FTP
SHORT TEST
3-MODE
FTP
SHORT TEST
3-MODE
FTP
SHORT TEST
3-MODE
FTP
SHORT TEST
3-MODE
FTP
SHORT TEST
3-MODE
FTP
SHORT TEST
3-MODE
FTP
SHORT TEST
3-MODE
FTP
SHORT TEST
3-MODE
FTP
SHORT TEST
3-MODE
FTP
SHORT TEST
3-MODE
TEST MODE
HI SPEED
LOW SPEED
IDLE 75)
IDLE (N)
HI SPEED
LOW SPEED
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
HI SPEED
LOW SPEED
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
HI SPEED
LOW SPEED
IDLE ID)
IDLE (N)
HI SPEED
LOW SPEED
IDLE 75)
IDLE (N)
HI SPEED
LOW SPEED
IDLE 75)
IDLE (N)
HI SPEED
LOW SPEED
IDLE 75)
IDLE (N)
HI SPEED
LOW SPEED
IDLE 76)
IDLE (N)
HI SPEED
LOW SPEED
IDLE 75)
IDLE (N)
HI SPEED
LOW SPEED
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
RLRP
11.2
11.2
26.0
12.0
15-3
15-3
36.0
18. 0
11
21.0
9-0
11.2
11.2
26.0
12.0
13.2
13-2
31.0
15-0
11:1
?5:8
11.2
11.2
26.0
12.0
10.3
10.3
f!:8
11.2
11.2
26.0
12.0
14.7
14.7
31.0
15.0
HC
2.26
1.37
95-00
140.00
210.00
130.00
6.71
4.98
310.00
340.00
700.00
1000.00
1.14
1-25
55.00
50.00
230.00
1.16
0.84
30.00
30.00
35.08
32,00
1.46
1.11
80.00
25.00
30.00
30.00
2.06
2.82
110.00
130.00
30.00
35.00
3-45
2.70
40.00
230.00
530.00
550.00
1.17
0.51
§8:88
30.00
0.54
0.31
5.00
20.00
25.00
30.00
l:Io
160.00
130.00
320.00
460.00
CO
0.70
0.50
1.10
1.30
163-21
103-82
10.00
9-80
9.00
9-00
27-01
17-03
0.50
0.60
4.80
13-70
5.60
0.07
0.02
0.03
0.02
44.10
21.53
1-35
0 04
0^3
0.05
47.76
83-85
2.00
1.20
0.05
0.04
68.20
40.05
0.08
2.00
2.50
9-40
19.34
6.10
2.50
3.20
0.05
6.42
0.74
0.03
0.03
0.02
0.02
8:8
2.90
1.30
4.50
4.20
C02
439.0
364.8
622.8
521.0
332.2
172.1
509.1
410.0
529.8
451-3
596.6
440.3
371.4
291.8
449-5
350.9
584.8
447.4
517.8
425.5
1
NOXC i
3-52
3-75
2463-75
1443.41
470.96
116.17
1.25
1.08
62.13
106.0?
32.07
20.04
1.44
1.56
624.54
491 .44
45-09
2.19
2.05
655-25
696.21
655-25
92.19
1.23
0.93
970.57
511.92
151.53
45.09
1.08
0.44
§89 '.Ob
266.20
80.16
2.26
2.03
829-31
573.35
29.06
23-05
0.79
0.94
266.20
76.16
40.08
1.14
1.49
W.ti
93.19
44.09
l.'ol
522 16
2§6'.20
98.20
33-07
riME TO
STABILIZE
19
20
15
21
18
11
I
0
0
0
4
4
7
4
23
20
19
17
4
1
4
23
17
30
20
18
10
26
24
n
20
23
26
17
*D ?8DEWL SHOHT TEST BaSS108 RESULTS IN GRAMS/MILE
BHISSION RESULTS ARE:HC - PPM/HEX, CO - *,, UNCORRECTED NOX - PPM
IS IN SECONDS
1-3
-------
APPENDIX I.CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE, FEDERAL SHORT TEST, AND FEDERAL
THREE MODE TEST EMISSION RESULTS ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES
DENVER
VEHICLE
NUMBER
033
031
036
038
012
013
Oil
015
231
232
1 YEAR MAKE MODEL CID TEST TYPE
1975 OLDS CUTL 350 g^ ^
3-MODE
1975 OLDS DELT 155 FTP
513 SHORT TEST
3-MODE
1975 PLYM DUST 225 FTP
SHORT TEST
3-MODE
1975 PONT LEMA 350 FTP
SHORT TEST
3-MODE
1975 HOND SEDA 91 FTP
SHORT TEST
3-MODE
1975 TOYO CORO 133 FTP
SHORT TEST
3-MODE
1975 VOLK SEDA 97 FTP
SHORT TEST
3-MODE
1975 VOLK STAW 90 FTP
SHORT TEST
3-MODE
1975 AMMO GREM 232 FTP
SHORT TEST
3-MODE
1975 AMMO HORN 301 FTP
SHORT TEST
3-MODE
TEST MODE
HI SPEED
LOW SPEED
IDLE 76)
IDLE (N)
HI SPEED
LOW SPEED
IDLE TD)
IDLE (N)
HI SPEED
LOW SPEED
IDLE To)
IDLE (N)
HI SPEED
LOW SPEED
IDLE To)
IDLE (N)
HI SPEED
LOW SPEED
IDLE 75)
IDLE (N)
HI SPEED
LOW SPEED
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
HI SPEED
LOW SPEED
IDLE T5)
IDLE (N)
Eh SB
IDLE 75)
IDLE (N)
HI SPEED
LOW SPEED
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
HI SPEED
LOW SPEED
IDLE TD) .
IDLE (N)
RLHP
"liTI"
13.2
31.0
15.0
11.0
11.0
31.0
15.0
11.2
11.2
26.0
12.0
12.0
12.0
31.0
15.0
8.3
8-3
21.0
9.0
10.9
10.9
26.0
12.0
8.8
8.8
21.0
9.0
18:1
29:8
10.3
10.3
26.0
12.0
12.3
12.3
26.0
12.0
HC
U4
135.00
170.00
55.00
15-00
1.75
0.73
90.00
110.00
55.00
110.00
Hi
105.00
110.00
100.00
3.21
1.12
235.00
110.00
30.00
160.00
1.99
1.29
195.00
190.00
130.00
1.91
0.87
68.00
130.00
125.00
15.00
2.82
2.21
165.00
220.00
170.00
0.89
0.61
5:88
110.00
22.00
2.25
1.58
100.00
150.00
180.00
1.02
0.75
60.00
70.00
70.00
50.00
CO
63.55
26.92
2.80
2.10
0.05
0.05
32.19
10.11
1.85
1.80
0.05
0.05
55.21
16.68
2.10
2.10
3.30
56.77
11.11
1.90
1.70
0.50
1.50
51.83
31-32
5.10
3.10
2.60
10.67
31.18
0.38
1.60
Ml
31.22
29.91
1.10
2.20
6.00
16.30
1.81
1.20
0.50
3:8
31.26
21.59
0.90
0.20
1.20
11.63
3 .^^
0.10
0.05
0.05
0.05
C02
191.7
119.4
605.8
180.1
105.5
318.5
512.7
176.9
269.2
217.1
310.9
327.7
285.9
229.5
396.7
327-1
395-1
§28.1
596.6
tta£. Q
186.9
NOXC s
0.94
839.54
ffi:?
50.10
0'$)
532.39
552 87
JK .Of
88.18
1.51
1.16
1816.70
829.31
77.16
oil
430'0?
I-01
10.02
0.83
0.78
358.34
348.10
42.09
2.45
0.84
1592.73
993 • ''
58.12
41.08
2.91
2.10
2190.00
1393-61
76.16
1.70
1.35
?s§:3§
40!08
2.18
1.91
IK
£\JV*VV
an 19
J V- 1 7
1.98
2.01
767-8?
470.96
66 1»
48.10
MB10
•— ——.
15
8
12
22
14
16
13
17
PC
O
)4
21
24
li
17
33
23
2
3
12
9
21
12
35
l!
20
0
0
0
3
25
25
FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE AND FEDERAL SHORT TEST EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS/MILE
FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST EMISSION RESULTS ARE:HC - PPM/HEX, CO - >, UNCOHRECTED NOX - PPM
TIME TO STABILIZE IS IN SECONDS
1-4
-------
APPENDIX i .CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE, FEDERAL SHORT TEST, AHD FEDERAL
THREE MODE TEST EMISSION RESULTS ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES
DENVER
234
235
236
238
2M
2*5
246
217
YEAR «*KE HODEL CID
'1975 *»» "*™ ^°
1975 BOIC SKYH 231
1975 BUIC SKYL 260
1975 BUIC RSGA 350
1975 BUIC STAW 350
1975 BUIC RIVI 455
1975 CHEV VEGA 140
1975 CHEV MONZ 140
1975 CHBV MONZ 262
1975 CHBV NOVA 250
TEST TYPE
FTP
SHORT TEST
3-MODE
FTP
SHORT TEST
3-MODE
FTP
SHORT TEST
3-MODE
FTP
SHORT TEST
3-MODE
FTP
SHORT TEST
3-MODE
FTP
SHORT TEST
3-MODE
FTP
SHORT TEST
3-MODE
FTP
SHORT TEST
3-MODE
FTP
SHORT TEST
3-MODE
FTP
SHORT TEST
3-MODE
TEST MODE
HI SPEED
LOW SPEED
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
HI SPEED
LOW SPEED
IDLE ID)
IDLE (N)
HI SPEED
LOW SPEED
IDLE ID)
IDLE (N)
HI SPEED
LOW SPEED
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
HI SPEED
LOW SPEED
IDLE T5)
IDLE (N)
HI SPEED
LOW SPEED
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
HI SPEED
LOW SPEED
IDLE To)
IDLE (N)
HI SPEED
LOW SPEED
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
HI SPEED
LOW SPEED
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
HI SPEED
LOW SPEED
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
RLHP
"Tl.i
13-2
31.0
15.0
10.3
10.3
26.0
12.0
13.2
13-2
31.0
15.0
13.2
13-2
31.0
15.0
14.0
14.0
31-0
15.0
14.7
14.7
36.0
18.0
9-9
9-9
21.0
9-0
10.3
10.3
?26:§
11.3
11-3
26.0
12.0
11.2
11.2
26.0
12.0
HC
0.74"
0.45
30.00
40.00
35.00
38.00
1.15
0.55
155.00
215.00
230.00
160.00
Ul
180.00
180.00
320.00
470.00
2.31
1.72
80.00
115.00
175.00
170.00
2.71
2.42
65.00
50.00
600.00
520.00
3.54
3.71
§.00
.00
.00
.00
1:1!
120.00
200.00
320.00
1.98
1.82
20.00
130.00
370.00
240.00
0.78
0.33
50.00
50.00
50.00
45.00
0.81
0.19
85.00
40.00
235.00
150.00
CO
iTp"
0.60
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.03
20.52
8.85
4.70
2.80
2.20
2.00
64.07
45.50
5.20
3.05
4.30
4.90
mi
3:18
1.90
2.80
66.68
71.33
4.25
4.90
5.70
6.10
97.41
156.96
5.50
6.50
7.40
7-30
68.99
42.96
2.10
3.00
7.90
18:8
2:88
6.80
5-50
11.53
1.87
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
13-77
2.09
1.35
0.40
3.80
3.00
C02
IsT
434.5
345.0
439.1
355.4
541.0
436.9
573-2
442.4
641.6
450.5
316.5
272.2
378.0
292.8
516.7
427.8
479.4
392.8
TIME TO
NOXC STABILIZE
I'll
5-59
2886.82
2364.20
202.04
65.13
1.74
1.56
819.07
1368.75
409-53
55.11
1.12
0.80
614.30
582-59
307.15
65-13
1.00
0.52
604.06
184.36
92.1Q
40.08
1.12
0.47
307.15
83.34
24.05
20.04
1.31
0.42
80.16
5^1
1.33
1.29
1169.66
962.40
24.05
0.85
0.63
ifrft
10.02
12.02
2.23
1-13
511.92
327.63
103.55
58.12
2.78
2.62
1567.84
995.45
§3.17
54.11
18
20
22
22
25
25
15
15
6
6
26
62
26
21
6
13
15
15
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
n
27
30
0
0
0
0
FB*8»I. THRBB ^ FEDEBAL SHORT TBST MSSION RESULTS IN GRAMS/MILB
TWBIO -W.DT, DB TEST EMISSIOH RESULTS AHE:HC - PPM/HEX, CO - %, ONCORRECTED NOX - PPM
814811428 IS ID SECONDS
1-5
-------
APPENDIX I.CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE, FEDERAL SHORT TEST, AND FEDERAL
THREE MODE TEST EMISSION RESULTS ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES
DENVER
VEHICLE
NUMBER
248
249
250
252
253
263
264
266
267
270
1 YEAR MAKE MODEL CID TEST TYPE
?975 CHEV NOVA 262 FTP
onunl 1 bo 1
3-MODE
1975 CHEV CAMA 350 FTP
OllUltl 1EO1
3-MODE
1975 CHEV NOVA 350 FTP
SHORT TEST
3-MODE
1975 CHEV MALI 350 FTP
SHORT TEST
3-MODE
1975 CHEV MALI 350 FTP
SHORT TEST
3-MODE
1975 CHEV CAPR 400 FTP
SHORT TEST
3-MODE
1975 CHEV IMPA 400 FTP
SHORT TEST
3-MODE
1975 CHEV CAPR 454 FTP
SHORT TEST
3-MODE
1975 CHRY CORD 360 FTP
SHORT TEST
3-MODE
1975 DODG DART 318 FTP
SHORT TEST
3-MODE
TEST MODE
HI SPEED
LOW SPEED
IDLE To)
IDLE (N)
HI SPEED
LOW SPEED
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
HI SPEED
LOW SPEED
IDLE ID)
IDLE (N)
HI SPEED
LOW SPEED
IDLE TD)
IDLE (N)
HI SPEED
LOW SPEED
IDLE ID)
IDLE (N)
HI SPEED
LOW SPEED
IDLE ID)
IDLE (N)
HI SPEED
LOW SPEED
IDLE ID)
IDLE (N)
HI SPEED
LOW SPEED
IDLE TD)
IDLE (N)
HI SPEED
LOW SPEED
IDLE ID)
IDLE (N)
HI SPEED
LOW SPEED
IDLE TD)
IDLE (N)
RLHP
\\:i
26.0
12.0
13-2
13-2
31.0
15.0
12.3
12.3
26.0
12.0
12.0
12.0
31.0
15.0
12.0
12.0
31.0
15.0
12.7
12.7
31.0
15.0
14.7
14.7
36.0
18.0
14.0
14.0
31.0
15.0
14.0
14.0
31.0
15.0
11.2
11.2
26.0
12.0
HC
~06~"
1.21
65.00
65.00
50.00
35.00
2.10
1.72
150.00
190.00
265.00
260.00
45.00
35.00
275.00
280.00
2.2?
1.82
50.00
60.00
170.00
165.00
2.42
1.05
140.00
25.00
50.00
50.00
0.53
0.41
15.00
15.00
20.00
15.00
1.11
0.43
20.00
25.00
40.00
35.00
0.63
0.33
10.00
20.00
30.00
20.00
3.36
2.22
150.00
170.00
200.00
190.00
4.23
1.92
105.00
195.00
290.00
220.00
CO
'J:tt
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
61.50
57.51
4.00
4.40
3.40
3.30
102.39
84.28
0.50
0.30
7.30
6.50
61.00
44.16
1.50
1.80
3.20
3.10
45.34
16.17
2.90
0.05
0.03
0.03
8.09
6.17
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
23.64
1.74
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
10.25
0.94
0.04
0.04
0.05
0.04
97.41
46.06
4.80
3.40
5.20
5.80
70.50
14.83
0.90
1.20
1.80
3.10
C02
524.0
416.0
523.5
395.8
516.7
419.3
SI2:?
C2? c
449.8
660.6
520.4
741.0
623.3
781-1
642.6
551.1
465.9
487.8
435.1
NOXC '
2.16
1.61
1003.16
655.25
368.58
79.16
1.56
0.74
1119.89
409.53
113.95
53.11
1.01
0.66
130.01
119.01
17 10
308
1.19
0.71
911.21
368.58
219.72
39.08
0.97
0.47
614.30
327.63
255.96
76.16
2.15
1.48
1194.55
614.30
121.22
13-09
1.90
1.13
798.59
470.96
44.09
34.07
1.85
1.19
lll'.ll
\Z.V)
2 -®
2.67
'11
5h 12
D. it
-.92
1.95
082.80
56.12
46.09
'iHEtO
WBlJj
0
0
0
0
'?
18
21
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
n
u
A
u
A
u
0
0
0
0
16
8
13
i
4]
11
FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE AND FEDERAL SHORT TEST EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS/MILE
FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST EMISSION RESULTS ARE:HC - PPM/HEX, CO - %, UNCORRECTED NOX - PPM
TIME TO STABILIZE IS IN SECONDS
1-6
-------
APPENDIX I,CONT 'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE, FEDERAL SHORT TEST, AND F
THREE MODE TEST EMISSION RESULTS ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES
FEDERAL
DENVER
VBHICU
8DHBER
IHffuM*"
273
275
277
281
282
284
285
286
287
' YEAR MAKE MODEL CID TEST TYPE
-WT »ODG CHAR 360 FTPRT ^
3-MODE
1975 DODG MONA 100 fl^ m
3-MODE
1975 FORD MUST 110 FTPRT ^
3-MODE
1975 FORD MUST 171 FTP
SHORT TEST
3-MODE
1975 FORD GRAN 302 FTP
SHORT TEST
3-MODE
1975 FORD STAW 351 FTP
SHORT TEST
3-MODE
1975 FORD TORI 100 FTP
SHORT TEST
3-MODE
1975 FORD LTD 351 FTP
SHORT TEST
3-MODE
1975 FORD ELIT 351 FTP
SHORT TEST
3-MODE
1975 FORD LTD 351 FTP
SHORT TEST
3-MODE
TEST MODE
HI SPEED
LOW SPEED
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
HI SPEED
LOW SPEED
IDLE ID)
IDLE (N)
HI SPEED
LOW SPEED
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
HI SPEED
LOW SPEED
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
HI SPEED
LOW SPEED
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
HI SPEED
LOW SPEED
IDLE (Dl
IDLE (N)
HI SPEED
LOW SPEED
IDLE 75)
IDLE (N)
HI SPEED
LOW SPEED
IDLE 75)
IDLE (N)
HI SPEED
LOW SPEED
IDLE 75)
IDLE (N)
HI SPEED
LOW SPEED
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
RLHP
'"TlTo"
12.0
31.0
15-0
11.0
11.0
31.0
?5.0
10.3
10.3
26.0
12.0
10.3
10.3
26.0
12.0
11.2
11.2
26.0
12.0
11.7
11.7
31.0
TS.O
11.0
11.0
31-0
15-0
!!:?
?5:8
11.0
11.0
31.0
15.0
11.0
11.0
31.0
15.0
HC
2)98
185.00
210.00
250.00
235.00
1.70
1.01
85.00
100.00
250.00
390.00
1.63
1.17
10.00
100.00
100.00
70.00
1.19
0.80
52.50
35.00
17-50
3.01
1.79
85-00
90.00
560.00
390.00
1.17
0.81
10.00
35.00
300.00
60.00
1.18
0.83
10.00
10.00
70.00
10.00
3.72
2.57
270! oo
215.00
3-69
2.26
110.00
160.00
190.00
125.00
1.16
0.79
15.00
10.00
110.00
155.00
CO
in?
siio
5.10
137-29
106.09
3.10
2.10
8.00
8.30
mi
2.30
0.35
o'.IS
21.17
8.27
0.21
0.08
0.05
?l:Ii
0.27
0.07
10.00
7.10
12.22
27.95
0.90
1.60
8.20
1.20
26.51
16.67
0.15
0.80
2.10
1.00
91.00
12.17
1:28
3:18
103.28
56.88
1.60
1.30
2.10
1.60
27.25
21.27
0.90
1.20
5.00
1.60
C02
"ioiTg"
137.3
663.3
519.8
371.1
317.0
195-3
395.6
591.2
513-1
750.8
616.8
725-0
607-1
591-5
518.2
§96:3
68§-8
578.8
1
NOXC S
I'M
717.10
1111.77
5b.\2
1.63
1.38
655.25
601.06
11.09
33.07
2.09
1.85
911.93
860.02
66.11
39-08
1.69
1.17
1257.09
552.87
37.58
2.08
1.97
819.07
716.68
6.01
10.02
1.33
0.82
890.71
95.97
103.55
11.08
2.27
1.65
1211.32
221.77
75.15
12.09
1.67
1.00
1f|l
1.39
1.03
583.59
mi
69.11
1.89
1.13
1015.23
161.16
80.16
62.13
'IME TO
STABILIZE
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
5
15
1?
21
0
0
0
0
8
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
SHORT TEST EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS/MILS
EMISSION RESULTS ARE:HC - PPM/HEX, CO *, BNCORRECTED NOX - PPM
1-7
-------
APPENDIX I.CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE, FEDERAL SHORT TEST, AND FEDERAL
THREE MODE TEST EMISSION RESULTS ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES
DENVER
VEHICLE
NUMBER
289
290
293
294
295
297
298
300
308
311
YEAR MAKE MODEL CID TEST TYPE
1Q75 FORD LTD 400 FTP
ly'5 SHORT TEST
3-MODE
1975 FORD LTD 400 FTP
*" SHORT TEST
3-MODE
1975 FORD LTD 460 FTP
* SHORT TEST
3-MODE
1975 LINC CONT 460 FTP
SHORT TEST
3-MODE
1975 MERC MONA 302 FTP
SHORT TEST
3-MODE
1975 MERC MONT 351 FTP
SHORT TEST
3-MODE
1975 MERC COUG 351 FTP
SHORT TEST
3-MODE
1975 OLDS OMEG 260 FTP
SHORT TEST
3-MODE
1975 PLYM SCAM 318 FTP
SHORT TEST
3-MODE
1975 PLYM FURY 360 FTP
SHORT TEST
3-MODE
TEST MODE
HI SPEED
LOW SPEED
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
HI SPEED
LOW SPEED
IDLE To)
IDLE (N)
HI SPEED
LOW SPEED
IDLE ?D)
IDLE (N)
HI SPEED
LOW SPEED
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
HI SPEED
LOW SPEED
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
HI SPEED
LOW SPEED
IDLE (5)
IDLE (N)
HI SPEED
LOW SPEED
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
LOW ip!l>
IDLE T5)
IDLE (N)
HI SPEED
LOW SPEED
IDLE T5)
IDLE (N)
HI SPEED
LOW SPEED
IDLE To)
IDLE (N)
RLHP
12.7
31.0
15.0
14.0
14.0
31-0
15.0
14.0
14.0
31.0
15.0
11:1
36.0
18.0
11.2
11.2
26.0
12.0
14.0
14.0
31.0
15.0
14.0
14.0
31.0
15.0
12.0
12.0
31.0
?5.0
11.2
11.2
26.0
12.0
12.0
12.0
31.0
15. 0
HC
ii~35~~
205.00
195.00
900.00
700.00
1.39
1-32
25.00
30.00
80.00
60.00
2.78
2.05
40.00
70.00
185.00
90.00
l-M
20.00
35.00
95.00
50.00
1.37
0.56
120.00
210.00
300.00
190.00
1.13
0.98
30.00
35.00
80.00
45.00
1.94
1.39
40.00
60.00
160.00
55.00
2.14
1.33
18:88
50.00
70.00
0.80
1.55
60.00
180.00
70.00
35.00
3.42
2.47
130.00
120.00
180.00
185.00
CO
301.30
254.35
7.60
8.80
10.00
10.00
46.55
29.11
1.00
1.60
1.80
1.10
80.81
16.76
1.15
2.10
6.30
1.10
35-28
31.18
1.50
3.00
3.80
2.30
39.00
10.45
3-70
5.40
3:Io
31.53
24.07
0.90
1 • 30
1 10
0.55
47-00
30.82
0.90
1.80
3.40
1.00
59.93
28.93
0:04
0.03
15-50
20.84
1.30
2.20
0.30
0.02
95.19
53-70
4.10
2.00
4.20
4.00
C02
605.1
499.8
111:?
lll:l
832.5
690.9
602.2
509-8
651.3
544.9
657.3
532-3
536.6
438.5
591.2
153-2
529.0
149.4
NOXC ]
0.61
0.49
166.68
lH2
16^3
1.10
0.81
491.44
Qfl 10
yv . 15
44 09
36:07
1.69
1.18
819.07
179.31
29 06
25.05
1.62
0.85
552.87
116.17
59.12
45.09
0.54
0.47
296.91
217.19
48.10
42.09
1.58
0.88
972.64
166.68
64.13
44.09
2.24
1.55
860.02
348.10
27.06
30.06
1.51
1.09
1194.55
290.91
430.01
151.
1.13
1.21
962.40
470.96
1 13 65
45^09
i:B
fli:S
8:1?
jj*
:IKEIO
ittBim
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Q
0
fl
u
0
o
o
0
0
5
5
10
\
0
0
0
0
0
ft
u
0
j
1!
I
0
0
0
0
D
0
0
FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE AND FEDERAL SHORT TEST EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS/MILE
FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST EMISSION RESULTS AHE:HC - PPM/HEX, CO - %, UNCORRECTED NOX - PPM
TIME TO STABILIZE IS IN SECONDS
1-8
-------
APPENDIX I.CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE, FEDERAL SHORT TEST, AND FEDERAL
THREE MODE TEST EMISSION RESULTS ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES
DENVER
313
314
318
320
321
322
325
326
TEAR _M*KE MODEL_
"?975 PL™ FUHY
1975 PLYM FURY
1975 PONT ASTR
1975 PONT LEMA
1975 PONT STAW
1975 PONT GRNV
1975 AUDI FOX
1976 CAPR GHIA
1975 COLT SEDA
1975 DATS 710
CID
400"
360
140
350
400
455
97
171
98
119
TEST TYPE
FTP
SHORT TEST
3-MODE
FTP
SHORT TEST
3-MODE
FTP
SHORT TEST
3-MODE
FTP
SHORT TEST
3-MODE
FTP
SHORT TEST
3-MODE
FTP
SHORT TEST
3-MODE
FTP
SHORT TEST
3-MODE
FTP
SHORT TEST
3-MODE
FTP
SHORT TEST
3-MODE
FTP
SHORT TEST
3-MODE
TEST MODE
HI SPEED
LOW SPEED
IDLE 76)
IDLE (N)
HI SPEED
LOW SPEED
IDLE ID)
IDLE (N)
HI SPEED
LOW SPEED
IDLE 7D)
IDLE (N)
HI SPEED
LOW SPEED
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
HI SPEED
LOW SPEED
IDLE 75)
IDLE (N)
HI SPEED
LOW SPEED
IDLE 75)
IDLE (N)
HI SPEED
LOW SPEED
IDLE 757
IDLE (N)
HI SPEED
LOW SPEED
IDLE 757
IDLE (N)
HI SPEED
LOW SPEED
IDLE ID)
IDLE (N)
HI SPEED
LOW SPEED
IDLE 757
IDLE (N)
RLHP
TiiTo"
14.0
31.0
15.0
14.0
14.0
31.0
T5.0
9.9
9-9
21.0
9.0
13.2
13.2
fl:8
11:1
?86:§
14.7
14.7
»:8
1:1
21.0
9.0
9.9
9.9
26.0
12.0
9.9
9.9
21.0
9.0
9.9
9-9
21.0
9.0
HC
120.00
130.00
260.00
210.00
3-00
1.97
160.00
160.00
260.00
250.00
3.96
2.24
70.00
135.00
320.00
250.00
0.78
0.33
30.00
40.00
45.00
110.00
1.41
0.45
110.00
45.00
50.00
50.00
1.42
0.41
55.00
40.00
40.00
30.00
1.64
1.07
180.00
140.00
90.00
2.48
0.50
215.00
315.00
222^0
2.76
1.60
40.00
85.00
75.00
2.46
1.58
140.00
110.00
90.00
CO
"IjTiiiJ"
46.20
3.00
5. go
2.80
4.10
71.14
31.53
4:60
5.00
105.36
66.37
2.00
3.20
9-90
9.50
11'88
2 .00
0.05
0.20
0.04
0.03
49.95
14.27
2.90
0.50
0.05
0.04
44.74
9.60
2.40
2.10
0.05
0.05
8.64
3.68
1.65
0.40
0.20
66.09
3.14
6.25
8.90
48.17
29.70
1.60
1.00
3.20
46.52
31.20
2.45
2.00
1.20
C02
"ioiTi"
500.0
550.2
458.2
317-5
266.5
600.1
482.7
664.0
546.5
722.0
595.0
360.5
298.9
453-0
453.0
411.9
338.9
325.9
279.7
TIME TO
NOXC STABILIZE
.........
685.97
1418.52
78.16
57.12
1.44
2.05
1045-23
1542.95
54.11
43-09
8:1?
1343.86
196.99
18.04
16.03
5.65
4.15
2115-34
2140.23
161.63
111.12
1.66
1.80
726.92
1B6:89
65.13
8:li
563.11
224.77
101.02
93.19
1.17
0.74
1318.98
583.59
77-16
0.91
0.61
111
0.98
0.76
737.16
337.87
36.07
1.84
1.45
1343.86
563.11
44.09
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
29
30
n
0
0
0
0
25
22
15
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
^"AL
TDffi TO
FBDERAL SHORT
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS/MILE
STAB EMISS^ON RESULTS ARB:HC - PPM/HEX, CO - »,. UNCORRECTED NOX - PPM
1-9
-------
APPENDIX I.CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE, FEDERAL SHORT TEST, AND FEDERAL
THREE MODE TEST EMISSION HESflLTS ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES
DENVER
VEHICLE
NUMBER YEAR MAKE MODEL
327 1975 DATS B210
328 1975 DATS SEDA
329 1975 FIAT STAW
•
330 1975 FIAT X1-9
331 1975 BOND CVCC
332 1975 MAZD RX3
333 1975 MAZD RX3
335 1975 MG MGB
336 1975 OPEL STAW
338 1975 PORS 91 1S
CID TEST TYPE
85 FTP
SHORT TEST
3-MODE
1 19 FTP
SHORT TEST
3-MODE
78 FTP
SHORT TEST
3-MODE
79 FTP
SHORT TEST
3-MODE
91 FTP
SHORT TEST
3-MODE
70 FTP
SHORT TEST
3-MODE
70 FTP
SHORT TEST
3-MODE
110 FTP
SHORT TEST
3-MODE
116 FTP
SHORT TEST
3-MODE
164 FTP
SHORT TEST
3-MODE
TEST MODE
HI SPEED
LOW SPEED
IDLE 7.D)
IDLE (N)
HI SPEED
LOW SPEED
IDLE To)
IDLE (N)
HI SPEED
LOW SPEED
IDLE 75)
IDLE (N)
HI SPEED
LOW SPEED
IDLE (D
IDLE (N)
HI SPEED
LOW SPEED
IDLE 75)
IDLE (N)
HI SPEED
LOW SPEED
IDLE 7.D)
IDLE (N)
HI SPEED
LOW SPEED
IDLE 75)
IDLE (N)
Eiw IPIB
IDLE 75)
IDLE (N)
HI SPEED
LOW SPEED
IDLE 75)
IDLE (N)
HI SPEED
LOW SPEED
IDLE 75)
IDLE (N)
RLHP
8:8
21.0
9.0
9.9
9.9
21.0
9.0
8.8
8.8
21.0
9.0
9.4
9.4
21.0
9.0
1:1
21.0
9.0
10.9
10.9
21.0
9-0
9.9
9-9
21.0
9.0
9.4
9.4
10.3
10.3
21.0
9.0
9.4
9.4
21.0
9.0
HC
1.89
1.43
190.00
135.00
130.00
2.20
1.49
90.00
135.00
275.00
100.00
2.14
1.17
75.00
90.00
2000.00
0.77
0.29
150.00
30.00
30.00
H?
100.00
120.00
265.00
1.44
0.23
0.00
0.00
0.00
4.70
9.98
10.00
10.00
10.00
0.75
0.39
38:88
30.00
2.57
1.98
110.00
140.00
135.00
110.00
2.37
1.97
to. oo
0.00
70.00
CO C02
28.35 293.9
16.80 243.9
2.90
4.20
1.45
47.36 336.2
25.18 178.3
1.80
1.60
3.60
T.80
46.97 326.6
22.50 272.4
2.40
3.00
9.60
1I:iI i9i81i
6.70
0.30
0.08
12.79 287.0
6.62 236.7
1.40
0.90
1.90
11.34 662.4
4.07 555.5
0.05
0.05
0.02
30.22 1026.3
87.09 579.4
0.20
0.05
0.10
21.12 452.4
11.31 375-6
J.j|g
1.00
49.08 387.2
34.79 326.6
2.40
3-10
3.50
2.80
39.36 436.5
26.60 402.5
1.20
1.20
2.10
NOXC
1.69
1.05
15*2.95
675.73
48.10
2.13
1.76
1269.20
839 54
v Jj *j1
41 '.08
4.10
3.73
1592.73
055.25
27.06
1.53
1.74
846.14
796.36
62.13
1.48
1.20
2986.36
1244.32
118.70
0.63
0.40
307.15
80.16
29.06
0.66
0.42
430.01
113-65
24.05
0.81
0.57
158:3?
61.13
1.63
0.9B
.
^?§*?i
10x55
77:18
1:8
88:8
73.15
1 J*
"HE ft
— • — .
8
5
5
0
0
0
0
21
™
30
o
0
0
E
I
6
0
0
0
0
0
n
V
8
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE AND FEDERAL SHORT TEST EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS/MILE
FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST EMISSION RESULTS ARE:HC - PPM/HEX, CO - %, UNCORRECTED NOX - PPM
TIME TO STABILIZE IS IH SECONDS
1-10
-------
APPENDIX I.CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE, FEDERAL SHORT TEST, AND FEDERAL
THREE MODE TEST EMISSION RESULTS ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES
DENVER
reHICLE YEAR MAKE MODEL CID TEST-TYPE TEST MODE RLHP HC
"~i5Tr~T«o--s3isr-pTp--™; T~TfT
3,1 1975 TOYO
CORO
97
1975 VOLK SEDA
97
3,3 1975 VOLK
RABB
90
1975 VOLV SEDA
121
511 1975 FORD
GRAN
200
512 1975 MERC
5'3 1975 OLDS
MONA
250
OMEG
250
1975 PLYM
GRNF
too
515
1975 PONT
VENT
250
TEST TYPE
FTP
SHORT TEST
3-MODE
FTP
SHORT TEST
3-MODE
FTP
SHORT TEST
3-MODE
FTP
SHORT TEST
3-MODE
FTP
SHORT TEST
3-MODE
FTP
SHORT TEST
3-MODE
FTP
SHORT TEST
3-MODE
FTP
SHORT TEST
3-MODE
FTP
SHORT TEST
3-MODE
FTP
SHORT TEST
3-MODE
TEST MODE
HI SPEED
LOW SPEED
IDLE 75]
IDLE (N)
HI SPEED
LOW SPEED
IDLE ID)
IDLE (N)
HI SPEED
LOW SPEED
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
HI SPEED
LOW SPEED
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
HI SPEED
LOW SPEED
IDLE (5)
IDLE (N)
HI SPEED
LOW SPEED
IDLE 75)
IDLE (N)
HI SPEED
LOW SPEED
IDLE 75)
IDLE (N)
LOW SPEED
IDLE 76)
IDLE (N)
HI SPEED
LOW SPEED
IDLE 75)
IDLE (N)
HI SPEED
LOW SPEED
IDLE 75)
IDLE (N)
RLHP
1:9
26.0
12.0
9.4
9.4
21.0
9-0
8.8
8.8
21.0
9-0
8.3
8.3
21.0
9.0
10.3
10.3
26.0
12.0
11.2
11.2
26.0
12.0
11.2
11.2
26.0
12.0
11.2
11.2
?26:8
li:4
ft!
11.2
11.2
26.0
12.0
HC
2.28
2.16
60.00
115-00
900.00
2.43
1.36
188.00
190.00
38.00
2.97
2.03
150.00
190.00
250.00
il:S
170.00
165.00
110.00
2.12
1-31
120.00
90.00
80.00
35.00
1.36
0.62
30.00
45.00
30.00
0.57
0.30
20.00
20.00
25.00
25.00
1.80
0.78
240.' 00
240.00
4.19
4.06
85-00
60.00
315.00
390.00
1-30
0.29
140.00
35.00
40.00
30.00
CO
24.77
20.22
0.25
1.10
0.75
33-48
20.78
0.76
1.68
0.37
fcfl
1.10
0.45
2.70
59.55
43-61
5-10
2.30
2.80
67.75
49.03
3.80
2.80
2.80
0.80
27-82
13-66
1.50
2.90
0.05
20.64
4.60
2.60
0.05
0.05
0.05
30.61
5.77
oonoom
»-ooo
onooo
125.69
90.24
4.00
2.50
8.50
8.50
32.23
7.75
4.30
0.04
0.07
0.03
C02
nu
iS?:f
291.8
244.0
273.2
229.5
403.7
339.1
542.5
434.1
588.8
490.4
511.0
435.5
628.9
522.8
44Q. 7
368.5
T
NOXC £
2.51
1.60
2986.36
1443.41
90.19
2.12
1.93
2289.54
920.80
43.09
1.94
1.32
2015.80
706.45
71.15
0.81
0.59
849.78
645.02
37.08
1.00
0.57
696.21
34! 07
0.92
0.58
186.89
33.07
31.06
1.71
1.49
166.68
430.01
131.33
52.11
2.16
2.44
665.49
1368.75
307.15
146.48
1.16
1.15
634.78
552.87
32.07
25.05
2.60
2.90
798.59
1244.32
307.15
82.17
'IME TO
STABILIZE
20
20
40
11
16
10
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
29
16
11
10
8
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
TIHE TO
ND FEDERAL SHORT TEST SESSION RESULTS IN GRAMS/MILE
TEST EMIS?ON RESULTS ARE:HC - PPM/HEX, co - *> UNCORRECTED NOX - PPM
is IN SECONDS
I-U
-------
APPENDIX I.COHT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE, FEDERAL SHORT TEST, AND FEDERAL
THREE MODE TEST EMISSION RESULTS ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES
DENVER
NUMBER6 YEAR MAKE MODEL
516 1975 BMW SEDA
517 1975 BMW 5301
518 1975 SUBA STAW
519 1975 HERB 450S
520 1975 POHS 914
521 1975 SAAB 99LE
522 1975 AMMO HORN
523 1975 AMMO HORN
524 1975 DODG MONA
525 1975 MERC MARQ
CID TEST TYPE
121 FTP
SHORT TEST
3-MODE
182 FTP
3-MODE
83 FTPRT TEST
3-MODE
276 FTP
SHORT TEST
3-MODE
120 FTP
SHORT TEST
3-MODE
121 FTP
SHORT TEST
3-MODE
232 FTP
SHORT TEST
3-MODE
258 FTP
SHORT TEST
3-MODE
440 FTP
SHORT TEST
3-MODE
460 FTP
SHORT TEST
3-MODE
TEST MODE
HI SPEED
LOW SPEED
IDLE 75)
IDLE (N)
HI SPEED
LOW SPEED
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
HI SPEED
LOW SPEED
IDLE 7D)
IDLE (N)
HI SPEED
LOW SPEED
IDLE 75)
IDLE (N)
HI SPEED
LOW SPEED
IDLE 75)
IDLE (N)
HI SPEED
LOW SPEED
IDLE 75)
IDLE (N)
HI SPEED
LOW SPEED
IDLE 75)
IDLE (N)
L0"w fpf ED
IDLE 75)
IDLE (N)
HI SPEED
LOW SPEED
IDLE 76)
IDLE (N)
HI SPEED
LOW SPEED
IDLE 7D)
IDLE (N)
RLHP
11.2
11.2
26.0
12.0
12.7
12.7
31.0
15.0
9.4
9.4
21.0
9.0
12.7
12.7
31.0
15.0
9.4
9.4
21.0
9.0
1:1
21.0
9.0
10.3
10.3
26.0
12.0
12.0
12.0
ft*
13.4
13-4
?5'0
11:3
HC
0.85
0.25
5.00
5.00
10.00
l:ll
20.00
20.00
2000.00
2.95
2.06
145.00
135.00
290.00
1.23
1.11
40.00
35.00
60.00
45.00
2.12
1.22
40.00
40.00
60.00
1:!5
90.00
120.00
1550.00
2.24
1.66
110.00
135.00
255.00
225.00
2.95
1.76
28-88
60.00
115.00
100.00
3.07
2.70
80.00
100.00
240.00
250.00
1-12
0.88
25.00
25.00
40.00
30.00
CO
14.06
4.30
0.05
0.10
0.10
38.20
46.77
2.00
3.40
5.80
24.83
15.5(5
0.65
1.90
1.50
17.97
7.04
1.15
1.00
2.10
1.00
26.59
20.53
0.30
0.15
0.65
10.23
9.10
0.50
0.50
1.15
32.81
11.20
1.20
0.60
2.50
2.40
70.88
25-43
o:?5
3-30
3.20
59.33
30.14
1.20
0.80
3.70
3.60
26.52
17-47
0.18
0.45
0.95
0.60
C02
"•87-5
384.7
694.8
560.4
293-7
252.5
682.}
548.8
387.0
313.7
346.6
265-0
388.3
323-6
498.3
427-0
643.7
525.7
833-4
670.2
HOXC $
0~79
0.5?
470.96
1HO hi
10S.1l
103.55
0.56
0.38
151.53
33.11
23.05
2.26
1.80
2065.57
583.59
44.09
1.81
1.22
522.16
94.19
35.07
32. Ot
1.36
0.92
952.17
358.34
82.17
2.67
2.14
2588.18
1144.77
82.17
3:»
2090.45
1119-09
195-99
78.16
1.98
2.04
he
552:37
J -2*17
1 10.1 1
2.13
3.01
ta
4 I .uv
30.06
2.15
1.54
1418.52
430.01
80 16
48.10
liS
«lhj
•»»•
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
11
V
0
o
o
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
ft
u
Q
V
g
0
0
0
0
28
%
li
0
0
0
0
FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE AND FEDERAL SHORT TEST EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS/MILE
FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST EMISSION RESULTS ARB:HC - PPM/HEX, CO - %, UNCORRECTED NOX - PPM
TIME TO STABILIZE IS IN SECONDS
1-12
-------
APPENDIX J
-------
APPENDIX J
FR INSPECTION/MAINTENANCE EVALUATION TASK MALADJUSTMENT AND
DISABLEMENT INSPECTION, DIAGNOSTIC AND MAINTENANCE PROCEDURES
This appendix contains the Maladjustment and Disablement Inspection,
i enostic and Maintenance Procedures employed in the Denver Inspection/
aintenance Evaluation Task. These procedures are general. In specific
ituations, the diagnostic and maintenance procedures listed in the
epair manuals were followed.
Major paragraphs contained within this appendix are titled as
ollows:
J-l
-------
APPENDIX J
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
J.I DEFINITION OF MALADJUSTMENT AND DISABLEMENT J-3
J.2 MALADJUSTMENT AND DISABLEMENT INSPECTION J-3
J.2.1 Air Cleaner System j_3
J.2.2 Air Injection System J-4
J.2.3 Exhaust System
J.2.4 Exhaust Gas Recirculation System
J.2.5 Carburetion System j_4
J.2.6 Ignition System j-5
J.2.7 Fuel Evaporation Emission Control System j«5
J.2.8 Crankcase Emission Control System j.g
J.3 OPERATIONAL QUICK CHECKS j-6
J.3.1 Thermostatic Air Cleaners (TAG) j-8
J.3.2 Air Injection Reactors (AIR) j-9
J.3.3 Exhaust System j-10
J.3.3.1 Thermal Reactors j-10
J.3.3.2 Catalytic Converters j-10
J.3.4 Exhaust Gas Recirculation j-11
J.3.5 Fuel System Controls J-12
J.3.6 Ignition System Controls J-13
J.3.6.1 Engine Overheat Protection Controls J-15
J.3.7 Crankcase Emission Control Systems J-17
J.3.7.1 Operational Quick Checks - Tank Caps J-17
J.3.7.2 Operational Quick Checks - Crankcase
Storage J-17
J.3.7.3 Operational Quick Checks - Canister
Storage J-17
J.4 ENGINE DIAGNOSTIC AND MAINTENANCE PROCEDURES J-20
J.4.1 Diagnostic Sequence J-21
J.4.2 Manufacturer's Required Emission Maintenance J"21
J.4.3 Maintenance Cost and Other Limitations J"22
J.4.4 Replacement Parts . J"22
J.4.5 Specifications, Setting and Adjustment
References J~"
J.4.6 Emission Analyzer Utilization J"^
J.4.7 Post-Maintenance Procedure J"^
J.4.8 Cost Accounting J"z
J-2
-------
nrFTMTTTON OF MALADJUSTMENT AND DISABLEMENT
Maladjustment and disablement are defined for application in this
e unrk as any deviation from manufacturer's specifications not
Scope ot wotiv. *» j
normal wear and tear. Maladjustment includes those actions (or
idence thereof) relating to the wrong adjustment of some adjustable
engine parameter such as ignition timing or idle fuel/air mixture.
Disablement includes those actions (or evidence thereof) which can be
construed to be the willful removal, deactivatlon, alteration or
replacement with a part or system which, in essence, does not perform
the same function as the original part or system, of emission related
parts or components. Disablement is to be corrected prior to the
performance of further diagnostic and maintenance work on the vehicle.
J.2 MALADJUSTMENT AND DISABLEMENT INSPECTION
Functional as well as visual checks are to be made on all systems,
subsystems and components relating to the emission controls. The
crankcase, exhaust and evaporative emission controls are to be subjected
to these checks.
It may be necessary to partially disassemble and/or remove some
items to properly determine the operational status.
J'U Air Cleaner Sv*f*na
nspect the air cleaner system for elevated or inverted air cleaner
een>ent housing covers, the removal and/or deactivation of the hot air
Source Mi jj
• tne disablement of the vacuum signal or the modification and/or
dl8>blement of the damper door.
Aiy i
eaner system mounted temperature sensors operate in conjunction
with vario
8 other systems. These sensors are to be checked in
J-3
-------
conjunction with the Inspection of these systems.
Dust and/or oil laden elements are not regarded as disablement-
however, non-standard elements are.
J.2.2 Air Injection System
Inspect the secondary air injection system for proper connection
and operation. Air hoses and pipes, belts, vacuum lines and valves are
to be included in said inspection. Perform the Operation Quick Check (s)
listed in paragraph J.3.2. Do not document low air flow, delayed
diverter valve action or other deficiencies which may be regarded as
normal wear and tear resulting from age or mileage acccumulation as
disablement.
J.2.3 Exhaust System
Inspect the exhaust system for integrity of original equipment
manufacturer (OEM) configuration and components. Document aftermarket
dual exhaust pipes, glass pack mufflers, headers, converter removal,
removal of the heat riser valve and any other non-standard parts or
configurations.
J.2.4 Exhaust Gas Recirculation System
Inspect the exhaust gas recirculation (EGR) system for proper
connection and operation. Perform the Operation Quick Check listed in
paragraph J.3.A.
If the valve does not operate, a check of system components is to
be made to determine if disablement of the vacuum source is the cause.
Stuck valves, relays or sensor due to age or mileage accumulation is
not regarded as disablement.
J-2.5 Carburetion System
Inspect the carburetor for the presence or absence of i<*le f«e
J-4
-------
ent liraiter caps. If present, check if these caps properly limit
travel of the idle fuel/air needle valve.
Check also for additional disablement which may include the instal-
of performance items in the areas of intake manifolds, carburetors,
. cieaners, fuel pumps and pressure regulators. Installation of
nual choke devices, removal of electric assist choking mechanisms or
vacuum delay units and modifications to the bowl venting system are also
to be inspected and regarded as disablement.
j.2.6 Ignition System
Inspect the ignition system for proper connection and operation.
Check in particular the initial timing setting. If not to specifications,
determine if the condition is due to normal wear and tear or to
intentional maladjustment.
The ignition timing controls are to be given a gross check to
Indicate any alterations to both the centrifugal and the vacuum advance
mechanisms. Key points as listed in the specifications for these
mechanisms are to be checked using a timing light (protractor) and a
supplemental vacuum source.
Any missing ignition components are to be documented. Such a
^termination la to be made based on a comparison between the ignition
component application table (or schematic) contained in the repair
"•""I and the subject engine.
Deration of the ignition system is to be checked using the
Rational Quick Check listed in paragraph J.3.6. Whenever the desired
result i«
not obtained a more detailed inspection is to be performed to
establish th
e cause,- be it maladjustment or normal wear and tear. These
J-5
-------
detailed inspections are to be performed in accordance with procedures
listed in the repair manual.
Integrity of the vacuum controls is to be documented. Hoses that
have been disconnected, by-passed, plugged or re-routed to blind
connections are regarded as disablement. Split hoses or hoses that
have deteriorated through exposure to heat, fuel or oil are not.
Any installed ignition controls not listed in the vehicle service
manual are also to be subjected to the connection and operation
inspection as prescribed by the manufacturer of such controls. The
results of this inspection are to be documented.
J.2.7 Fuel Evaporative Emission Control System
Inspect the evaporative emission control system for proper
connection and operation. Note, in particular, the plugging or removal
of hoses, alteration of the fuel tank filler neck and substitution of
the gas tank cap. All of these conditions are regarded as disablement.
Dirt laden fuel loss traps are not.
J.2.8 Crankcase Emission Control System
Inspect the crankcase emission control system for proper connection
and operation. Check, in particular, for obvious positive crankcase
ventilation (PCV) valve substitution (disablement) as may be evident, for
example, by a threaded PCV valve forced into a rubber PCV hose. Assuming
f 1fltf
the valve part number corresponds to the manufacturer's listing, mere
rate departures from specifications are not regarded as disablement.
prescribed part numbers having flow rates different from the prescri e
part is regarded as disablement, however.
J-3 OPERATIONAL QUICK CHECKS
The Operational Quick Checks listed below are to be utilized ln
J-6
-------
nection with the Maladjustment and Disablement Inspection and the
niaRttostic Procedures to Indicate any problems in the corresponding
emission control systems and subsystems. Once these problems have been
indicated, however, procedures listed in the respective repair manual
are to be followed to verify and correct the condition.
J-7
-------
J.3.1 Thermostatic Air Cleaners (TAG)
Purpose - Supply carburetor with properly heated air.
Test
Operation Quick Checks
Results Required
A. TAC - no vac. used,
(door positioned by
thermostat). Engine
below operating temp. ------ See door closed blocking
cold air.
Engine at operating temp. - - - - See door partially open.
Engine above operating
temp. See door full open to
cold air.
B. TAC - Door stat & vac
motor used. Engine
idling See vac at hose end when
removed and all in "A".
C. TAC - Door positioned
by vac. motor (no stat)
Engine off See door in heat "off"
position.
Engine idling and engine
compartment temp, below
85°F See door in heat "on"
position.
Engine idling and engine
compartment temp, above
100°F See door in heat "off"
position.
D. TAC - dual snorkel
Conditions same as in "C" See all in "C".
Accelerate engine rapidly
in neutral Hear sharp "clack" in extra
snorkel when its door moves.
E. TAC - ram air. No checks necessary - driver's option through
cable controls.
J-8
-------
j 3.2 Air Infection Reactors (AIR)
Purpose - Supply additional air to nix with exhaust gases in
exhaust manifold for more complete combustion.
Operation Quick Checks
Pump Test
Results Required
A. System using hoses.
Run engine at steady
1500 RPM. Clamp off
hose (s) to exhaust
manifolds ------
Snap throttle shut from
1500 RPM, (no clamped
Hoses) -------
Hear steady rushing noise
from pressure relief valve,
Hear rushing noise from
diverter valve for 1-3
seconds.
B. System using metal pipes,
Disconnect pipe (s) to
exhaust manifolds, accel-
erate engine to 1500 RPM-
Snap throttle shut from
1500 RPM (all pipes
reconnected)
See air flow increase with
increase of RPM.
Hear rushing noise from
diverter valve for 1-3
seconds.
J-9
-------
J.3.3 Exhaust System
J.3.3.1 Thermal Reactors
Purpose - to allow longer "residence time" of extreme]
hot exhaust gases in a chamber before they are discharged into the
exhaust pipe. This longer residence time allows more complete
outside the engine cylinder than can be attained using a standard
exhaust manifold.
There are no Operational Quick Checks for thermal reactors.
J.3.3.2 Catalytic Converters
Purpose - to continue the combustion process in the
exhaust system.
There are no Operational Quick Checks for catalytic converters.
J-10
-------
j|3>4 Exhaust Gas Recirculation Systems (EGR)
Purpose - Recirculate some of the exhaust gases back into the
intake manifold to aid in reducing NOx emissions.
Operation Quick Checks
Test
Bring engine to operating
temperature: Abruptly
accelerate idling engine to
2000 RPM (NOT OVER 3000 RPM)
several times - - - .
Engine idling: Manually
move EGR valve stem - - -
Results Required
See EGR valve stem move
and return as RPM is
changed.
See RPM drop.
See rough idle.
J-ll
-------
1.3.5 Fuel System Controls (Excludes Evaporative Loss Controls^
Purpose - Help maintain desired air-fuel mixture during different
modes of engine operation, (starting, idle, acceleration, deceleration
etc.).
With carburet ion, specifically named devices or systems are usually
"built in" as part of carburetor construction. Therefore, it is
difficult to perform any "Operational Quick Checks".
Generally, if an engine can be normally started, brought to
operating temperature, and is found to idle at RPM and CO specified,
many of the so called "systems" will have to be functional.
If engine at operating temperature will idle properly, none
of the following units could be malfunctioning.
ACV - Air cut valve Normal Idle
AEC - Auxiliary enrichment carburetor - - - - Normal idle
BCDD - Boost controlled deceleration
device- ---------------- Normal idle
CRV - Coasting richer valve ------- Normal idle
DV - Decel valve (carburetor)- - - Normal idle
FCV - Fuel cut-off valve Normal idle
ISS - Idle stop solenoid Normal idle
MCV - Mixture control valve Normal idle
TP - Throttle positioner Normal idle
TPV - Throttle poppet valve Normal idle
VTM - Vacuum throttle modulator Normal idle
In this area, most of the diagnostician's judgment shall be base
on specified idle conditions and actual HC-CO readings.
J-12
-------
J3 6 Tgi-ttion System Controls
p rpose - Prevent distributor vacuum advance or further retard
Ition timing (idle, in lower forward gears, on deceleration, etc.).
Operation Quick Checks
Test Results Required
DAS (1 wire)
Engine idling, disconnect
lead at bullet connector See no change in RPM.
Use jumper wire from battery
& to solenoid lead --------- See idle increase approxi-
mately 50 RPM.
See 7.5° advance in timing.
DD (2 distributors)
Engine idling at operating
temp., connect timing
light to one coil- Note timing setting.
Now connect timing light
to other coil ----. See a timing setting change
of 8° to 14°.
BDD (2 vac hoses)
(DAD)
Engine idling at operating
temperature, remove advance
vac hose -------------- See no vacuum.
See no RPM change.
Remove retard hose and
block with finger See vacuum at hose.
See RPM change.
Plug retard hose on advance
aide of diaphragm See increased RPM.
Remember to reinstall both
hoses correctly when check
is complete.
g» (Single coil)
fneine idling at operating
temperature, connect jumper
«« from advance to retard
Primary terminals of
stributor See RPM decrease, (approx.
100 RPM).
J-13
-------
Test Results Required
Connect timing light, watch
timing marks and remove
jumper wire _____-_-- See timing advance
approximately 10°.
DRS (2 wires)
Engine idling at operating
temperature, disconnect
vac. hose at distributor
diaphrahm ------------ See no vacuum.
Plug hose, connect timing
light Note timing setting.
Open throttle slightly- - - See timing advance
at least 5°.
DV ("Ignition" decel valve)
Engine idling at operating
temperature, remove advance
hose at distributor diaphragm - - - - See no vacuum.
Plug hose, connect timing
light
Increase speed to 2000 RPM,
hold for 5 seconds Note timing setting.
Snap throttle shut See quick retard of
timing.
Replace hose, increase speed
again to 2000 RPM and hold 5
seconds _____ __ See greater advance.
Snap throttle shut See greater advance
remain for 3 seconds.
PVA (without solenoid)
Engine idling at operating
temperature, disconnect vac.
advance hose at distributor ----- See no vacuum.
Accelerate engine to 1500
RPM Note vacuum at hose end.
PVA (with solenoid)
See TAV for quick checks.
J-14
-------
Teat
scs
ludes KSC, CEC, TCS
jack up rear wheels, USE
SAFETY STANDS. Engine at
operating temperature idling
in neutral, remove vac.
advance hose --------
Automatic Transmissions
Shift transmission into
"Drive", accelerate and
cruise for 30 seconds- -
Standard Transmissions
Shift transmission into
high gear and release
clutch
If no vacuum at hose
accelerate and cruise
for 30 seconds
Results Required
See no vacuum at hose.
See vacuum appear (may
take up to 30 seconds)
at any cruise speed
above 28 mph.
DO NOT EXCEED 40 MPH
See vacuum appear at
hose immediately.
See vacuum appear at
hose any speed above
28 mph,
DO NOT EXCEED 40 MPH
Jt3>6>1 Engine Overheat Protection Controls
Purpose - Aid in cooling engine back down to normal operating
temperature by advancing the ignition timing. (Increased ignition
^ng generally decreases internal engine heat while the resulting
Ceased idle RPM allows greater fan speed and efficiency).
ere are no Operational Quick Checks for most of these devices
8 ema« However, the normal function of other systems is usually
°y a malfunction in overheat protection control systems.
J-15
-------
Operational Quick Checks are for emission systems inspections, s
examples of overheat protection devices or systems are:
CTO - Coolant temperature override
DVCV - Distributor vacuum control valve
PVS - Ported vacuum switch (valve)
TCV - Temperature controlled vacuum valve
TO - Thermal override (switch)
TVBV - Temperature operated vacuum by-pass valve (EGR)
TVS - Thermal vacuum switch
TW - Thermo vacuum valve
J-16
-------
J3<7 F»Tnriitive Loss Control Systems
orative loss of unburned fuel is controlled by only two basic
in a carbon filled canister or (b) storage in the
j a
methods, \*)
nkcase of the engine. Both systems purge these stored fumes by
ing them through the intake manifold during engine operation.
Technicians need only determine if the storage method used seals
the fumes from escaping into the atmosphere and that the method of
purging is operational.
j.3,7.1 Operational Quick Checks - Tank Caps - Fuel tank caps, all
systems: Non-vented tank caps, plain or locking, are required. Note,
do not confuse non-vented caps containing pressure-relief valves with
vented caps.
J.3.7.2 Operational Quick Checks - Crankcase Storage - Crankcase storage
systems shall be visually inspected for:
(a) Vent hoses are required to lead the evaporated fumes into
the crankcase for storage.
(b) Purge is by a routing of hose (s) to either the air cleaner
or to the intake manifold.
(There is no carbon canister in these systems).
J'3'7'3 Operational Quick Checks - Canister Storage - Carbon canister
Sterns shall be visually inspected for:
(a) Canister in good condition, securely mounted, all hoses
attached.
) Vent hose (s) attached to canister for storage and additional
hose (s) shall route the purging of fumes by at least one
°f the following methods.
*• Purge by air cleaner
depression ----------- Purge hose (s) leads
, to air cleaner, snorkel
or both.
J-17
-------
II. Purge by idle vacuum - - - - -
III. Purge by engine speeds
above idle - - - -
IV. Two stage purging-
V. Delay purging
VI. Combination purging-
Purge hose leads to
port sensing manifold
vacuum at idle.
Purge hose leads to
port sensing manifold
vacuum only above idle
speeds.
More than one hose used
arrange to purge minimum
amount at idle speeds
with maximum purging
above idle speeds.
Purge is delayed under
certain engine operating
conditions, i.e.,
ambient air temperature,
operation in lower gears
etc. Purging hoses shall
be traced from canister
to engine ports.
Purge hose is "Teed" into
PCV system and purges
canister fumes whenever
PCV system is purging
crankcase fumes.
J-18
-------
Emission Control Systems
*°
Purpose - Vent crankcase and dispose of blow-by fumes.
Operational Quick Checks
Test Results Required
Type 1 - open
Clamp off PCV hose,
engine idling - - -
Type 2 - open
Clamp off PCV hose,
engine idling - - -
Type 3 - open or closed
Remove PCV hose from
air cleaner, engine
idling. Remove breather
cap and plug opening- - -
Type 4 - closed
Clamp off PCV hose,
engine idling
See 40-80 RPM drop on
tach.
Hear "click" as hose
clamped and released.
See at least 50 RPM
drop on tach.
Hear "thump" as hose
clamped and released.
See blow-by fumes appear
at open end of PCV hose.
See 40-80 RPM drop on
tach.
See NO blow-by fumes
from breather cap.
"Click" as hose clamped
and released.
J-19
-------
J.4 ENGINE DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURES
Diagnostic procedures are to be limited to those customarily
by the private sector repair industry and confined to emission related
aroaa. Instruments and equipment used in these procedures are to be
those commercially available to the repair industry and generally
recognized as routine tools of the trade. Typically included instruments
are:
Ignition analyzer (oscilloscope)
Tach-dwell meter
Vacuum/pressure gauges
Timing light
Compression tester
Vacuum pump
Hot and cold gun
Volt-ohm-arameter
HC/CO emission analyzer
Idle enrichment devices
Thermometers
Stop watch
Auxiliary cooling fan
Excluded specifically are dynamometers, laboratory-grade HC/CO analyze"
and data generated by these analyzers by other personnel. Also aped
cally excluded are practices and "field fixes" known only to a few
technicians and not supported by the manufacturer's reference manual.
Procedures and equipment may be expanded outside of the normal in*"*8
"tune-up" area, however, if they are necessary to perform the oanitf«c
required emission maintenance.
J-20
-------
ad test of the vehicle is allowed in extreme cases but is not
to be employed on a routine basis.
j.4.1 n^ffnoatic Sequence
Engine diagnosis is to be accompanied by complete documentation of
11 emission related "as-received" engine conditions.
Step 1 - Determine the extent of maladjustment and disablement in
the areas indicated on the "Maladjustment and Disablement Information
and Tune-un Data" sheet and state the nature of these alterations.
Use the guidelines and procedures provided under paragraph
J.2 MALADJUSTMENT AND DISABLEMENT INSPECTION and J.3 OPERATIONAL
QUICK CHECKS. Use also the procedures recommended by the manufac-
turer in dealing with specific situations.
Step 2 - Examine vehicle maintenance records and any other related
evidence and assess the need for additional manufacturer's
required service.
Step 3 - Perform an emission-oriented diagnosis as the final task
prior to the repair process. Use the guidelines and procedures
listed under J.3 OPERATIONAL QUICK CHECKS. Use also the procedures
recommended by the manufacturer in dealing with specific situations.
J«4.2 Manufacturer's Required Emission Maintenance
Only those items listed on the "Tune-up Information" sheet are to
be regarded as manufacturer required emission related maintenance. If
any of the items appearing on this sheet do not appear on the manufac-
turer s "required" maintenance schedule, work associated with these items
18 not to be performed. Also, the manufacturer may "suggest" or
recommend" additional services without "requiring" they be performed at
specific interval. Such additional services are not within the scope
project. The manufacturer required maintenance is to be performed
6 vehicle is within 1500 miles of the prescribed interval unless
there is
reasonable amount of evidence, either in the maintenance
'ecords of M.
vehicle or in repair receipts furnished by the owner, to
i n«lj *
e that such maintenance has, in fact, been performed.
J-21
-------
j.4.3 Maintenance Costs and Other Limitations
The nominal cost limit for each vehicle is $100. This limit is to
include; labor costs for both maintenance and any diagnostic costs
which would ordinarily be charged in a commercial garage; and parts.
Labor costs are to reflect flat-rate manual allowances for the specific
job or combinations of jobs and/or a typical commercial charge where
flat-rate allowances do not apply. Labor is to be charged for study
related cost accounting purposes at the current typical labor rate of
$13.50 per hour. Parts are to be charged, also for study related purposes,
at list price.
Any repairs or adjustments charged to the vehicle are to be confined
to the area of emission maintenance. Any repairs necessary to correct
an unsafe vehicle condition or those made in correcting any damage to
the vehicle occurring in the handling process are not to be reported in
connection with this aspect of the study.
J.4.4 Replacement Parts
Only OEM recommended parts are to be utilized. If these parts are
not available through the manufacturer's supply channels, the repairing
technician is to alert the Program Manager.
•J.4.5 Specification. Setting and Adjustment References
All service and adjustments are to be performed in accordance wit
the procedures and specifications prescribed by the vehicle manufacturer.
Reference materials are to be employed in the following order of priority-
1. Vehicle emission sticker
2. Owner * s manual
3. Manufacturer's shop manual
4. Independent service manual
5. Other (specify)
J-22
-------
T46 ?-•"-*<"" Analyzer Utilization
ji1**" .
Tie HC/CO analyzer Is to be used extensively in both the diagnostic
I mlhifltrnpnt oprrntfonw. Hmlnalon dntn g«nerntp
-------
Costs associated solely with disablement restoration are t
specifically indicated as such. e
Costs resulting from the emission-oriented diagnosis but not
related to the required maintenance schedule are to be
specifically indicated as such.
Costs associated with the required maintenance schedule are to
be specifically indicated as such. Work performed in connection
with items needing attention as indicated by both the diagnosti
process and the required maintenance schedule are to be charged°
solely to required maintenance.
J-24
-------
APPENDIX K
-------
APPENDIX K
TISTING OF 1972 FEDERAL HOT START TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
Legend
VEH NO. - Vehicle Number
YR - Model Year
MAKE - Vehicle Make
MODL - Vehicle Model
CID - Engine Displacement in Cubic Inches
TEST TYPE - Indicates the Portion of the Test or Composite
HOT TRANS - Hot transient portion of test
HOT STAB - Hot stabilized portion of test
1972 FTP - Composite of Hot Transient and Hot
Stabilized tests
HC - Hydrocarbon Emissions in grams per mile
CO - Carbon Monoxide Emissions in grams per mile
C02 - Carbon Dioxide Emissions in grams per mile
NOXC - Oxides of Nitrogen Emissions Corrected for Humidity
in grams per mile
FUEL ECON - Fuel Economy Calculated by the Carbon Balance Method
in miles per gallon
MTCE. - Presents the Test Results after maintenance
K-l
-------
APPENDIX K
LISTING OF 1972 FEDERAL HOT START TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO.
001
002
003
004
005
YR MAKE MODL CID TEST TYPE
75 CHEV TRUC 350 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
75 CHEV TRUC 350 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
75 CHEV TRUC 350 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
75 CHEV TRUC 350 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
75 DODG TRUC 318 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
7
5
6
N
N
N
2
3
3
N
N
N
2
1
2
N
N
N
2
0
1
N
N
N
3
3
3
N
N
N
HC
.0
.4
.2
/A
/A
/A
.7
.5
.1
/A
/A
/A
.5
.4
.0
/A
/A
/A
.5
.2
7
0
0
8
3
7
8
9
1
1
8
.34
/A
/A
/A
.6
1
.35
.4
/A
/A
/A
7
IRAMS
CO
66.
90.
79.
78.
121.
100.
58.
17.
37.
11.
0.
5.
48.
68.
58.
P
9
9
4
1
1
5
9
7
4
5
5
8
3
6
9
ER MI
C02
475.
509.
493.
509.
541.
525.
544.
682.
616.
611.
631.
621.
565.
580.
573.
NOXC
9
4
3
3
0
8
7
8
7
8
2
9
4
8
5
1.
0.
1.
2.
0,
1.
0.
1.
0.
3.
1.
2.
2.
1.
2.
55
91
22
28
90
56
83
01
93
39
89
61
60
r O
58
_ «•
07
HPG
FUEL
EC08
1U
13,3
13.9
13.8
12.0
12.8
13.8
12,*
13.0
13.9
UA
,0
Ufl
.0
13,*
12 1
1*1
13 1
i •>>
K-2
-------
APPENDIX K.CONT'D
NG OF 1972 FEDERAL HOT START TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO,
006
007
008
009
010
YR MAKE MODL CID TEST TYPE
75 FORD TRUC 302 HOT
HOT
72
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
72
75 FORD TRUC 302 HOT
HOT
72
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
72
75 FORD TRUC 351 HOT
HOT
72
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
72
75 FORD TRUC 351 HOT
HOT
72
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
72
75 CMC TRUC 350 HOT
HOT
72
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
72
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
HC
3.07
1. 10
2.05
N/A
N/A
N/A
0.73
0.31
0.51
N/A
N/A
N/A
2.02
1.99
2.01
N/A
N/A
N/A
4.13
2.44
3.25
N/A
N/A
N/A
0.53
0.27
0.39
N/A
N/A
N/A
RAMS P
CO
56.
19.
37.
11.
2.
7.
33.
51.
42.
42.
44.
43.
1.
0.
0.
8
8
5
9
4
0
2
4
7
2
6
5
2
0
6
ER MILE
C02
543.
668.
608.
497.
573.
537.
549.
598.
574.
527.
578.
554.
579.
620.
600.
6
9
9
3
6
1
7
0
8
5
9
3
6
2
8
NOXC
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
3.
1.
2.
3.
1.
2.
2.
1.
1.
69
60
64
91
71
81
16
25
16
46
65
52
47
47
95
MPG
FUEL
ECON
13.
12.
13.
17.
15.
16.
14.
13.
13.
14.
13.
14.
15.
14.
14.
8
6
2
1
3
1
6
0
7
6
5
0
2
3
7
K-3
-------
APPENDIX K.CONT'D
LISTING OF 1972 FEDERAL HOT START TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO. YR MAKE MODL CID TEST TYPE
HPG
GRAMS PER MILE Pl)EL
HC CO C02 NOXC ECON
Oil
012
013
014
015
75 AMMO HORN 258 HOT
HOT
72
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
72
75 BUIC CNTY 350 HOT
HOT
72
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
72
75 BUIC RIVI 455 HOT
HOT
72
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
72
75 BUIC REGA 350 HOT
HOT
72
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
72
75 CADI ELDO 500 HOT
HOT
72
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
•7 O
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
TPTO
2.
1.
2.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
0.
1.
3.
3.
3.
1.
2.
2.
2.
2.
2.
1.
0.
1.
7.
5.
6.
4.
4.
/.
34
92
12
70
17
43
61
32
46
37
89
12
19
11
15
92
34
14
84
61
72
27
85
05
84
48
61
94
26
c o
19.
22.
20.
17.
7.
12.
39.
30.
34.
38.
26.
32.
60.
65.
63.
61.
68.
65.
76.
66.
71.
34.
21.
27.
207.
125.
164.
159.
101.
ion
0
3
7
7
7
5
3
3
6
9
9
6
0
9
1
9
2
2
1
7
2
0
6
5
0
0
3
3
5
9
398.
435.
417.
440.
473.
457.
494.
546.
521.
517.
569.
544.
588.
618.
603.
584.
619.
602.
495.
533.
515.
539.
592.
567.
538.
605.
573.
582.
635.
61 n.
0
8
7
2
6
6
6
9
9
6
5
6
4
0
8
4
1
5
3
4
2
4
5
1
7
7
6
7
6
3
3
3
3
2
2
2
1
0
1
1
0
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
1
1
.87
.57
.72
.68
.55
.61
.41
.74
.06
.42
.65
.02
.38
.92
.14
.03
.84
.93
.10
.83
.96
.91
.41
.65
.88
f A
.49
.20
.92
n c
.35
.15
20,4
18,6
19,4
18,?
18,1
18,4
15,8
U,8
15,3
15,2
14,4
14,8
12,8
12,1
12,4
12.9
12.1
12.5
14,2
• A 1
13.7
U«
,0
14,9
t /. i
14.'
u 5
14, '
10,0
10.8
1 v 1
in 4
1U*
ID,5
11. °
A * *
10,'
K-4
-------
APPENDIX K.CONT'D
ING OF 1972 FEDERAL HOT START TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO,
016
017
018
019
020
YR MAKE MODL CID TEST TYPE
75 CHEV VEGA 140 HOT
HOT
72
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
72
75 CHEV NOVA 250 HOT
HOT
72
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
72
75 CHEV MONT 350 HOT
HOT
72
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
72
75 CHEV CAPR 350 HOT
HOT
72
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
72
75 CHEV IMPA 350 HOT
HOT
72
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
72
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
r
HC
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
1.
1.
1.
1.
0.
1.
2.
2.
2.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
83
89
86
84
57
70
86
32
58
53
08
29
79
30
53
30
95
12
18
01
09
51
22
36
46
01
22
52
03
26
RAMS PER MILE
CO C02
23.
23.
23.
21.
20.
20.
13.
2.
7.
6.
0.
3.
49.
43.
46.
41.
31.
36.
59.
53.
56.
45.
32.
38.
58.
43.
50.
58.
47.
52.
2
9
5
9
0
9
3
6
7
4
2
2
9
1
3
9
1
2
5
3
2
1
2
4
0
9
7
8
0
6
305.
341.
324.
320.
369.
346.
466.
485.
476.
450.
464.
458.
473.
513.
494.
493.
538.
517.
522.
586.
555.
558.
613.
587.
526.
584.
556.
561.
604.
583.
8
7
5
9
2
1
5
7
5
6
8
0
2
0
0
3
8
0
4
0
6
0
9
2
1
4
5
0
5
7
NOXC
1.
1.
1.
1.
0.
0.
2.
2.
2.
2.
2.
2.
1.
0.
1.
1.
0.
1.
1.
0.
0.
1.
0.
1.
1.
0.
1.
1.
0.
0.
54
14
33
03
71
86
14
17
15
42
42
42
31
71
00
29
81
04
15
71
92
23
80
01
30
73
00
26
70
97
MPG
FUEL
ECON
25.7
23.2
24.4
24.8
22. 1
23.3
18.1
18. 1
18.1
19.2
19.1
19.1
15.9
15.2
15.5
15.8
15.0
15.4
14.3
13.1
13.6
14.0
13.3
13.6
14.3
13.5
13.9
13.5
13.0
13.2
K-5
-------
APPENDIX K.CONT'D
LI
VEH
NO.
021
•
022
023
024
025
STING OF 1972 FEDERAL HOT START TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
GRAMS PER MILE FJgf
YR MAKE MODL CID TEST TYPE
75 CHEV STAW 400 HOT
HOT
72
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
72
75 CHRY NEWP 400 HOT
HOT
72
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
72
75 DODG CORO 318 HOT
HOT
72
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
72
75 DODG DART 225 HOT
HOT
72
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
72
75 FORD MUST 140 HOT
HOT
72
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
72
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
HC
4.
0.
2.
1.
0.
0.
1.
0.
0.
1.
0.
1.
1.
1.
1.
0.
0.
0.
3.
3.
3.
0.
0.
0.
1.
0.
0.
1.
0.
0.
58
41
41
58
41
97
19
38
77
70
82
24
47
70
59
77
19
47
24
55
40
71
40
55
28
46
85
03
42
71
CO
129.
25.
75.
52.
6.
28.
46.
11.
28.
84.
38.
60.
19.
39.
29.
3.
1.
2.
60.
72.
66.
14.
8.
11.
18.
15.
16.
14.
13.
14.
1
7
2
9
9
9
7
4
3
0
6
3
5
2
8
4
2
3
9
5
9
2
0
0
2
7
9
8
4
1
C02
683.
762.
724.
741.
809.
776.
643.
724.
685.
697.
797.
749.
525.
543.
534.
536.
570.
554.
343.
339.
341.
422.
436.
430.
398.
457.
428.
381.
448.
416.
NOXC
0
3
3
3
6
9
8
3
8
5
2
5
2
9
9
3
3
0
2
2
1
9
7
1
0
3
9
2
4
3
1.
0,
0.
1.
1.
1.
2,
1.
1.
i
1.
0.
1,
4.
1.
3,
4.
2.
3,
2,
1,
1,
1.
1.
1.
0.
0.
0.
1.
0.
•
00
94
97
60
20
39
20
60
89
34
96
14
46
75
05
36
49
38
14
53
82
25
03
13
92
/ 1
67
i rt
79
00
«6
0"
ECON
9,9
11,0
10,4
10,7
10,8
10,8
12,3
11,9
12,1
10,6
10.3
10,5
15,8
14,5
15,1
16.3
15.5
15.9
19.8
« n 1
19,1
* n L
19,4
19.8
i n 7
19,'
10 8
ID,0
20,6
18.4
1 Wl
19,4
1 / '
21,8
18,9
20,1
K-6
-------
APPENDIX K.CONT'D
1ISTING OF 1972 FEDERAL HOT START TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO,
026
027
028
029
030
YR MAKE MODL CID TEST TYPE
75 FORD TORI 351 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
75 FORD GRAN 250 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
75 FORD LTD 351 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
75 FORD LTD 400 HO.T TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
75 MERC MARQ 400 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
r
HC
2.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
3.
1.
2.
2.
0.
1.
3.
2.
2.
1.
0.
1.
09
22
64
50
19
34
96
25
59
92
22
55
76
57
66
55
50
52
73
01
31
33
96
61
27
70
97
72
95
32
RAMS PER MILE
CO C02
46.
28.
36.
28.
21.
24.
16.
0.
8.
10.
2.
6.
38.
35.
37.
28.
23.
26.
72.
42.
56.
45.
31.
38.
82.
82.
82.
41.
32.
36.
1
2
8
1
4
6
6
9
4
1
2
0
8
6
1
9
3
0
2
7
8
9
1
2
5
5
5
2
8
8
566.
612.
590.
573.
629.
602.
514.
566.
541.
533.
585.
560.
606.
669.
639.
610.
681.
647.
620.
706.
665.
639.
708.
675.
609.
666.
638.
715.
800.
760.
1
1
1
9
6
9
4
5
6
0
6
4
8
7
6
3
6
5
3
5
3
7
6
6
1
2
8
6
8
0
NOXC
2.
1.
1.
2.
1.
2.
0.
0.
0.
1.
0.
0.
2.
1.
1.
2.
1.
2.
1.
0.
0.
1.
1.
1.
2.
1.
1.
2.
1.
2.
06
47
75
83
93
36
96
99
98
16
78
96
53
33
90
88
77
30
08
77
92
58
03
30
04
15
57
71
89
28
MPG
FUEL
ECON
13.
13.
13.
14.
13.
13.
16.
15.
15.
16.
15.
15.
13.
12.
12.
13.
12.
12.
11.
11.
11.
12.
11.
12.
11.
11.
11.
11.
10.
10.
8
4
6
3
3
7
3
6
9
1
0
5
2
1
6
4
3
8
9
4
6
3
7
0
8
0
4
3
4
8
K-7
-------
APPENDIX K.CONT'D
LISTING OF 1972 FEDERAL HOT START TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
MPG
VEH
NO.
031
032
033
034
035
YR MAKE MODL CID TEST TYPE
75 MERC MONG 351 HOT
HOT
72
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
72
75 OLDS DELT 350 HOT
HOT
72
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
72
75 OLDS CUTL 350 HOT
HOT
72
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
72
75 OLDS DELT 455 HOT
HOT
72
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
72
75 PLYM FURY 318 HOT
HOT
72
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
72
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
HC
1.
1.
1.
1.
0.
0.
3.
3.
3.
2.
1.
1.
2.
1.
1.
2.
1.
1.
1.
0.
1.
1.
0.
0.
2.
2.
2.
1.
0.
0.
65
34
49
07
84
95
77
24
49
49
43
94
58
20
86
26
12
66
62
99
29
06
67
86
84
25
53
02
32
66
rRAna
CO
61.
47.
54.
37.
33.
35.
106.
74.
89.
97.
53.
74.
54.
26.
39.
48.
26.
36.
42.
21.
31.
41.
16.
28.
68.
66.
67.
9.
6.
8.
r E.K. PI j.
C02
8
5
3
4
4
3
5
7
9
0
1
1
6
1
7
1
4
8
9
1
5
3
9
6
7
2
4
5
6
0
567.
604.
587.
661.
743.
703.
472.
514.
494.
479.
533.
507.
472.
509.
491.
491.
527.
509.
524.
583.
555.
545.
582.
56.4.
483.
553.
519.
537.
600.
570.
LC,
NOXC
7
7
0
0
0
7
8
6
6
7
8
9
5
5
8
0
2
9
7
6
4
7
1
6
4
2
8
5
7
5
1
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
1
1
1
0
1
2
1
1
3
2
.92
.94
.41
.75
.02
.37
.39
.34
.37
.23
.79
.00
.95
.45
.69
.01
.53
.76
.41
.08
.24
.11
.98
.04
.07
1 4
f o
.58
.14
o-J
. t-3
•*
FUEL
ECON
13,2
13.0
13.1
12,3
11.1
11,6
13,6
13,8
13,?
13,9
14,3
14,1
15.7
16.0
15,8
15,5
15,5
15,5
14,9
14,3
14,'
14,5
i / 1
14, •>
14,
14.8
13, <
i -* •
14.0
16,0
14,5
15-2
K-8
-------
APPENDIX K.CONT'D
NG OF 1972 FEDERAL HOT START TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO,
036
037
038
039
040
YR MAKE MODL CID TEST TYPE
75 PLYM DUST 225 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
75 PONT CATA 400 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
75 PONT LEMA 350 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
75 PONT GRNV 455 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
76 CAPR SEDA 140 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
/
HC
3.
1.
2.
2.
1.
2.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
2.
1.
2.
1.
0.
1.
2.
0.
1.
2.
1.
1.
1.
2.
1.
2.
5.
4.
01
95
46
89
93
39
74
30
51
91
38
63
87
48
15
24
79
00
10
67
35
21
43
80
30
37
86
47
42
01
;RAMS p
CO
46.
44.
45.
43.
47.
45.
11.
3.
7.
16.
6.
11.
48.
32.
40.
32.
17.
24.
60.
24.
42.
50.
24.
36.
13.
64.
40.
36.
107.
73.
4
1
2
0
2
2
6
5
4
4
9
5
9
2
2
7
0
5
8
7
0
2
7
9
7
8
4
5
5
5
ER MILE
C02
362.
424.
394.
350.
414.
383.
579.
618.
599.
587.
661.
625.
499.
547.
524.
529.
602.
567.
595.
704.
651.
631.
715.
675.
414.
394.
404.
354.
283.
317.
7
5
9
1
7
7
0
9
8
0
2
7
5
2
3
5
2
4
1
0
9
9
9
7
8
5
2
7
3
5
NOXC
1.
1.
1.
2.
1.
1.
3.
2.
2.
3.
2.
2.
1.
0.
1.
2.
2.
2.
1.
0.
1.
1.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
1.
0.
0.
74
14
43
15
40
76
33
21
74
55
41
96
23
88
05
33
66
50
11
92
01
10
73
91
73
47
59
06
50
77
MPG
FUEL
ECON
19.
17.
18.
20.
17.
19.
14.
14.
14.
14.
13.
13.
15.
14.
14.
15.
14.
14.
12.
11.
12.
12.
11.
12.
20.
17.
18.
21.
18.
19.
9
8
7
8
9
2
8
2
5
4
2
7
2
7
9
2
1
6
7
9
3
4
7
0
1
6
7
1
9
9
K-9
-------
APPENDIX K.CONT'D
LISTING OF 1972 FEDERAL HOT START TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO.
041
042
043
044
045
YR MAKE MODL CID TEST TYPE
75 DATS B210 85 HOT
HOT
72
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
72
75 HOND SEDA 91 HOT
HOT
72
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
72
75 TOYO CORO 133 HOT
HOT
72
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
72
75 VOLK SEDA 97 HOT
HOT
72
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
72
75 VOLK STAW 90 HOT
HOT
72
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
72
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP,
TRANS
STAB
FTP
__r:
^^
HC
2.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
2.
2.
2.
2.
2.
2.
1.
Q.
0,
1.
0,
0,
26
59
91
64
50
57
79
79
79
46
48
47
72
48
59
59
33
46
43
96
70
34
57
46
10
55
81
05
55
79
RAMS
CO
34.
28.
31.
37.
28.
32.
50.
43.
46.
44.
36.
40.
25.
37.
31.
22.
23.
22.
32.
45.
39.
27.
27.
27.
11.
9.
10.
12.
9.
10.
PER MI
C02
0
4
1
0
4
5
1
8
8
1
4
1
2
1
4
0
1
6
2
3
0
9
0
4
4
4
4
9
0
9
257.
251.
254.
267.
255.
261.
235.
278.
257.
242.
295.
270.
313.
324.
319.
353.
371.
362.
249.
281.
265.
261.
292.
277.
370.
388.
379.
367.
373.
370.
LE
4
6
3
5
5
3
4
1
7
7
4
2
2
4
1
5
2
7
0
2
8
5
2
5
2
8
9
2
0
2
NOXC
2,
1.
2.
2.
1.
1.
1.
0.
0.
1.
0.
0.
3.
1.
2.
4.
1.
2.
3.
1.
2.
2.
2.
2.
2.
1.
1.
1.
.
.
60
77
17
26
62
92
23
63
92
26
62
93
77
31
49
11
54
77
06
93
47
82
05
42
07
« /
14
e O
58
79
06
7°
16
J«
HPG
FUEL
ECON
27,9
29,5
28,7
26,8
29,1
28,0
27,7
25,2
26,3
28,0
24,8
26,3
24,8
22,9
23,8
22.6
21, i
22,0
28,9
* i C
24,5
M / L
26.4
28,4
Or 0
25,'
17 0
2/>u
22,7
?l,9
* * *
22,3
*.* •
22,7
22,8
22,8
K-10
-------
APPENDIX K.CONT'D
TING OF 1972 FEDERAL HOT START TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
nw INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO,
231
232
233
231
235
YR MAKE MODL CID TEST TYPE
75 AMMO GREM 232 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
75 AMMO HORN 304 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
75 AMMO MATA 360 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
75 BUIC SKYH 231 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
75 BUIC SKYL 260 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
1
2
2
2
1
2
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
2
2
2
1
0
0
HC
.96
.09
.03
.02
.98
.00
.82
.55
.68
.02
.55
.78
.74
.26
.49
.63
.33
.47
.36
.54
.93
.62
.28
.44
.69
.84
.77
.09
.69
.88
RAMS P
CO
26
29
27
34
28
31
4
1
3
8
2
5
7
1
4
7
1
4
15
9
12
7
4
5
67
62
65
29
12
20
.2
.1
.7
.6
.2
.3
.6
.8
.1
.4
.7
.4
.1
.2
.0
.3
.5
.3
.9
.8
.7
.1
.4
.7
.7
.4
.0
.0
.7
.6
ER MILE
C02
361
424
394
394
480
439
544
615
581
518
563
542
543
562
553
540
558
549
398
427
413
398
427
413
397
417
407
460
499
481
.1
.4
.1
.2
.6
.3
.7
.4
.6
.9
.7
.2
.8
.5
.6
.2
.5
.8
.2
.9
.7
.0
.5
.4
.3
.1
.6
.9
.7
.1
NOXC
2
2
2
1
1
1
2
2
2
1
1
1
7
5
6
7
5
6
2
1
2
2
2
2
1
0
1
1
1
1
.41
.05
.22
.57
.38
.47
.55
.07
.30
.80
.69
.74
.53
.48
.46
.47
.52
.45
.17
.93
.05
.49
.07
.27
.22
.89
.05
.18
.05
.11
MPG
FUEL
ECON
21
18
20
19
16
17
16
14
15
16
15
16
15
15
15
16
15
15
20
19
20
21
20
20
17
16
17
17
17
17
.7
.6
.0
.5
.7
.9
.0
.3
.1
.6
.6
.0
.9
.7
.8
.0
.8
.9
.8
.9
.3
.6
.4
.9
.3
.9
.1
.4
.0
.2
K-ll
-------
APPENDIX K.CONT'D
LISTING OF 1972 FEDERAL HOT START TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
MPG
VEiM
NO.
236
238
240
244
245
YR MAKE MODL CID TEST TYPE
75 BUIC REGA 350 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
75 BUIC STAW 350 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
75 BUIC RIVI 455 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
75 CHEV VEGA 140 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
75 CHEV MONZ 140 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
2
2
2
1
1
1
2
2
2
1
2
1
3
3
3
2
1
1
2
3
3
2
2
2
1
1
1
0
0
0
HC
.29
.26
.28
.54
.20
.36
.73
.30
.50
.84
.12
.99
.47
.87
.68
.03
.30
.65
.81
.72
.28
.17
.69
.44
.33
.65
.50
.95
.65
.80
i n n ri c
cc
66.
62.
64.
44,
40,
42,
58,
60,
59,
52,
58,
55,
117,
138,
128,
48,
22,
35.
51 ,
65.
58,
39.
41 ,
40,
33,
40,
37,
25,
18,
21 ,
> r
)
,0
,3
,0
,9
,0
,3
, 1
,1
, 1
,2
,8
,6
,6
,8
,7
,4
,8
,0
,0
,0
.3
,8
,1
,5
,3
,6
, 1
, 1
,7
,7
c.n n
CO
488
531
511
507
573
542
528
568
549
553
586
570
554
584
570
607
701
656
291
327
310
287
329
309
355
367
361
346
364
355
X
2
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
0
•
L.C,
9
8
3
8
8
2
8
0
2
2
0
3
8
2
1
1
2
1
6
5
3
5
2
3
8
3
8
0
8
8
N
1
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
1
1
0
0
1
0
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
oxc
.05
.70
.87
.12
.63
.86
.33
.72
.01
.17
.77
.96
.23
.64
.92
.79
.18
.47
.71
.31
.50
.61
.40
.50
.90
54
1
.70
.08
_ t
.56
.81
FUEL
ECON
11,8
13,9
15,2
13,9
11,5
11.1
13.3
13,1
13,8
13.0
13,1
11.8
10,9
11,3
12.9
12.0
12.1
23.3
20.1
f\ 4 C
21.5
21.9
OO 1
fct i '
nO 3
23- J
21.5
pn.3
£ v 1 J
2fl(9
22,8
22.1
/
K-12
-------
APPENDIX K.CONT'D
TTNG OF 1972 FEDERAL HOT START TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO.
246
247
2H8
2*9
250
YR MAKE MODL CID TEST TYPE
75 CHEV MONZ 262 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
75 CHEV NOVA 250 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
75 CHEV NOVA 262 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
75 CHEV CAMA 350 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
?5 CHEV NOVA 350 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
2
2
1
1
1
2
3
3
1
2
1
HC
.52
.29
.MO
.41
.35
.38
.48
.80
.12
.52
.19
.35
.50
.39
.44
.58
.39
.48
.83
.62
.72
.84
.36
.59
.72
.61
.18
.56
.19
.89
}RAMS PER MILE
CO C02
4
1
2
2
0
1
18
12
15
9
3
6
1
0
0
3
1
2
85
81
83
70
49
59
73
126
100
37
57
48
.0
.0
.4
.9
.1
.4
.4
.4
.3
.8
.3
.4
.3
.0
.6
.1
.0
.0
.6
.4
.4
.6
.2
.4
.0
.3
.8
.3
.8
.0
492
505
499
487
487
487
439
472
456
463
488
476
491
531
512
517
570
545
449
477
463
460
532
498
480
483
481
515
539
528
.1
.5
.1
.2
.2
.2
.4
.5
.6
.9
.4
.7
.3
.3
.2
.6
.6
.3
.1
.4
.9
.4
.7
.1
.1
.4
.8
.6
.5
.1
NOXC
2
2
2
2
3
2
2
1
2
2
1
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
1
0
0
.10
.21
.16
.63
.10
.87
.63
.87
.23
.18
.86
.01
.26
.19
.22
.54
.46
.50
.64
.88
.25
.72
.84
.26
.41
.58
.98
.12
.73
.92
MPG
FUEL
ECON
17
17
17
18
18
18
18
17
18
18
18
18
17
16
17
16
15
16
15
14
14
15
14
14
14
12
13
15
13
14
.8
.5
.6
.0
.2
.1
.8
.9
.3
.5
.0
.2
.9
.7
.2
.9
.5
. 1
.0
.5
.7
.4
.4
.9
.7
.8
.6
.3
.9
.6
K-13
-------
APPENDIX K.CONT'D
LISTING OF 1972 FEDERAL HOT START TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO.
252
YR MAKE MODL CID TEST TYPE
75 CHEV MALI 350 HOT
HOT
TRANS
STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
TRANS
STAB
72 FTP
253
258
260
261
75 CHEV MALI 350 HOT
HOT
72
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
72
75 CHEV CAPR 350 HOT
HOT
72
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
72
75 CHEV IMPA 350 HOT
HOT
72
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
72
75 CHEV IMPA 350 HOT
HOT
72
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
72
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
n
HC
1
2
1
1
0
1
2
1
1
1
0
0
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
0
1
2
3
2
0
0
0
.80
.10
.96
.45
.88
.15
.00
.47
.72
.22
.66
.92
.12
.59
.36
.10
.20
.15
.71
.00
.86
.09
.95
.02
.52
.35
.95
.89
.46
.66
RAMS P
CO
48
54
51
47
38
42
43
33
38
36
20
28
61
75
68
40
39
40
54
67
61
43
29
36
69
99
85
36
17
.8
.7
.9
.5
.1
.6
.6
.3
.2
.9
.1
.1
.0
.8
.7
.7
.5
.1
.3
.9
.4
.3
.5
.1
.8
.1
.1
.9
.6
.9
ER MILE
C02
488
557
524
485
547
517
481
542
513
520
585
554
529
554
542
580
631
607
583
626
605
562
613
589
497
509
503
565
634
601
.2
.7
.4
.6
.5
.9
.8
.5
.4
.7
.5
.5
.7
.1
.4
.2
.7
.0
.2
.1
.6
.7
.6
.2
.3
.7
.8
.7
.3
.4
NOXC
1
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
.21
.96
.08
.67
,32
.49
.15
.53
.83
.82
.45
.62
.18
.56
.86
.07
.43
.74
.29
.70
.99
.49
.75
.10
.40
ff 4
.71
A ll
.04
.19
TC
,75
flf.
.90
HPG
FUEL
icon
15,6
13,6
11.5
15,?
11,5
15,1
15.9
11,8
15,3
15.2
11,3
14,8
14,0
13,0
13.5
13,?
12.7
13,2
13,2
. f, ft
12,0
ti R
12,3
14,0
'.
'
nli
i J *
13, T
1 J '
I3i'
K-14
-------
APPENDIX K.CONT'D
ITSTING OF 1972 FEDERAL HOT
L nw INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES B
START TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO.
262
263
264
266
26?
YR MAKE MODL CID TEST TYPE
75 CHEV IMPA 350 HOT
HOT
72
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
72
75 CHEV CAPR 400 HOT
HOT
72
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
72
75 CHEV IMPA 400 HOT
HOT
72
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
72
75 CHEV CAPR 454 HOT
HOT
72
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
72
75 CHRY CORD 360 HOT
HOT
72
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
72
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
2
3
3
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
2
3
2
1
2
HC
.72
.52
.14
.47
.39
.43
.32
.18
.25
.44
.18
.31
.27
.44
.83
.14
.50
.80
.52
.24
.38
.42
.22
.32
.31
.92
.11
• *3
.84
.12
RAMS P
CO
49
94
72
58
50
54
3
0
1
10
0
5
31
3
16
33
6
19
4
0
2
2
0
1
93
94
93
76
45
60
.8
.0
.8
.2
.5
.2
.5
.5
.9
.4
. 1
.1
.8
.0
.8
.9
.8
.8
.4
.2
.2
.2
. 1
.1
.1
.2
.7
.2
.8
.4
ER MILE
C02
502
501
501
538
602
571
592
639
617
619
660
640
654
717
687
664
711
688
710
789
751
713
794
755
508
561
536
521
592
558
.5
.2
.8
.3
.2
.6
.7
.7
.2
.1
.4
.6
.5
.7
.5
.3
.3
.8
.5
.8
.9
.3
.5
.7
.3
.8
.2
.9
.9
.9
NOXC
2
0
1
1
0
0
2
1
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
2
1
1
2
1
1
2
1
2
2
1
2
2
1
2
.14
.91
.50
.14
.61
.86
.57
.68
.11
.88
.22
.54
.28
.57
.91
.02
.50
.75
.45
.55
.98
.49
.54
.00
.77
.58
.15
.95
.88
.39
MPG
FUEL
ECON
15.1
13.4
14.2
14.0
12.9
13.4
14.8
13.8
14.3
13.9
13.4
13.7
12.5
12.3
12.4
12.3
12.3
12.3
12.3
11 .2
11 .7
12.4
11 .2
11 .7
13.3
12.3
12.8
13.7
13.2
13.4
K-15
-------
APPENDIX K.CONT'D
LISTING OF 1972 FEDERAL HOT START TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO.
268
270
272
273
275
YR MAKE MODL CID TEST TYPE
75 CHRY IMPE MO HOT
HOT
72
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
72
75 DODG DART 318 HOT
HOT
72
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
72
75 DODG CHAR 360 HOT
HOT
72
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
72
75 DODG MONA 400 HOT
HOT
72
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
72
75 FORD MUST 140 HOT
HOT
72
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72
FTP
n
HC
2
2
2
1
0
0
3
3
3
1
1
1
4
3
3
3
2
2
4
4
4
1
0
0
1
1
1
1
0
0
.23
.07
.14
.44
.55
.98
.49
.13
.30
.78
.64
.71
.05
.23
.62
.28
.52
.88
.34
.80
.58
.24
.56
.88
.42
.19
.30
.10
.87
.98
iRAMS P
CO
66
75
71
62
22
41
37
39
38
15
25
20
96
70
83
88
66
76
107
152
130
40
29
34
23
21
22
18
13
15
.1
.8
.1
.0
.8
.6
.2
.5
.4
.7
.2
.6
.9
.6
.2
.3
.5
.9
.5
.3
.9
.5
.6
.8
.2
.9
.5
.2
.8
.9
ER MILE
C02 NOXC
638
708
674
688
817
755
477
518
498
505
551
529
446
537
493
487
570
530
605
654
630
669
762
717
354
369
362
394
416
405
.9
.0
.9
.1
.4
.5
.8
.3
.9
.1
.9
.5
.4
.2
.7
.4
.3
.6
.2
.1
.7
.5
.0
.7
.1
.9
.4
.2
.1
.6
2
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
2
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
2
1
1
2
1
2
2
1
.22
,38
.78
.69
,16
,41
.70
.29
.97
.22
.78
.47
.•86
.51
.68
.67
.18
,42
.21
.28
,72
.21
I.
.04
f P.
.60
,62
0 II
.84
f\ 4
,21
.34
li rt
.49
00
,7U
HPG
FUEL
ECQK
11,8
10,6
11,2
11.2
10,1
10,8
16,2
15,0
15,6
16,6
11,9
15,6
1H, 5
13,5
1U
13,9
13,0
A h
13."
11,3
A H
9-11
4 A |
KM
12,0
11 0
1 1 1"
11 1
1 ii
22,5
21.7
C. • *
22,1
£6. 1
20,8
20,1
20,5
K-16
-------
APPENDIX K.CONT'D
TNG op 1972 FEDERAL HOT START TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO.
277
281
282
284
285
YR MAKE MODL CID TEST TYPE
75 FORD MUST 171 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
75 FORD GRAN 302 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
75 FORD STAW 351 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
75 FORD TORI 400 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
75 FORD LTD 351 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
1
0
1
1
0
0
2
2
2
1
0
1
1
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
1
3
3
3
1
3
2
HC
.91
.96
.41
.36
.64
.98
.75
.10
.41
.25
.92
.08
.40
.94
.16
.37
.06
.21
.05
.10
.07
.25
.82
.03
.49
.39
.44
.98
.20
.62
3RAMS P
CO
19
16
18
13
8
1 1
27
38
32
6
1
3
45
34
39
44
28
36
18
25
22
29
25
27
77
104
92
66
102
85
.9
.3
.0
.6
.6
.0
.0
.4
.9
. 1
.2
.6
.6
.3
.7
.5
.6
.2
.9
.5
.3
.4
.6
.4
.8
.9
.0
.9
.0
.2
ER MILE
C02
422
517
472
438
53^
488
557
612
585
552
599
576
667
753
712
657
747
704
646
713
681
698
801
751
541
580
562
631
649
640
.8
.9
.4
.3
.9
.7
.5
.0
.9
.5
.1
.8
.0
.5
.1
.7
.7
.6
.5
.3
.3
.3
.1
.9
.8
.9
.2
.5
.1
.6
NOXC
2
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
2
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
1
1
2
1
2
1
1
1
2
0
1
1
0
1
.22
.37
.78
.90
.30
.59
.46
.83
.13
.82
.79
.80
.78
.94
.34
.67
.06
.35
.98
.70
.31
.76
.21
.48
.57
.89
.69
.94
.88
.39
MPG
FUEL
ECON
19
16
17
19
16
17
14
13
13
15
14
15
1 1
11
11
12
11
1 1
13
11
12
1 1
10
11
13
1 1
12
1 1
10
11
.3
.2
.6
.1
.1
.4
.6
.1
.8
.7
.7
.2
.9
.0
.4
.1
.2
.6
.1
.7
.3
.9
.5
.1
.1
.7
.4
.9
.8
.3
K-17
-------
APPENDIX K.CONT'D
LISTING OF 1972 FEDERAL HOT START TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
TT ^ 11
VEH
NO.
286
287
288
289
290
YR MAKE MODL CID TEST TYPE
75 FORD ELIT 351 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
75 FORD LTD 351 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
75 FORD TORI 351 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
75 FORD LTD 400 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
75 FORD LTD 400 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
I
3
2
3
1
0
1
1
1
1
1
0
1
3
3
3
2
2
2
14
11
12
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
1
KG
.89
.82
.33
.27
.91
.08
.87
.78
.82
.22
.81
.01
.78
.81
.80
.61
.39
.50
.49
.35
.85
.52
.27
.39
.76
.99
.36
.89
.45
.14
[RAM
' I\ n 1 1 1
C!
109
70
89
49
22
35
38
62
50
32
30
31
102
130
116
58
56
57
313
317
315
57
44
50
56
37
46
59
39
49
SD
t
0
.5
.3
.1
.2
.0
.0
.0
.6
.9
.9
.3
.6
.3
.0
.7
.9
.3
.5
.2
.0
.2
. 1
.6
.6
.7
.1
.4
.6
.7
.2
ER M'
n n .
co;
525
615
572
676
745
712
617
651
635
646
746
698
543
571
558
605
686
647
536
593
566
730
838
786
674
745
711
850
994
925
IT C1
Lit
2
.2
.6
.3
.6
.6
.6
.1
.5
.1
.6
.4
.7
.8
.7
.3
.3
.6
.7
.7
.6
.3
.9
.4
.9
.3
.6
.5
.6
.6
.7
N
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
2
0
1
2
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
1
0
0
oxc
.25
.36
.31
.45
.73
.59
.50
.11
.78
,97-
.05
.19
,28
,92
.57
.29
.97
.60
.58
.58
.58
.90
.77
.83
.22
A ll
.84
— /*
.02
.03
f\ C
,95
nQ
.99
HI
FU1
EC(
12
12
12
11
11
11
13
11
12
12
11
11
12
11
11
12
11
11
8
7
10
1 n
10
11
1 1
I i
1 1
I i
9
8
8
>G
!L
)N
.5
,1
.3
.7
,3
,5
,0
,7
,3
,6
,1
,8
.4
,3
,8
,6
.3
.9
,3
1
.i
,8
7
• 1
?
,L
,5
0
• v
3
t J
,3
,1
,8
K-18
-------
APPENDIX K.CONT'D
ON
OF 1972 FEDERAL HOT START TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
KO, YR MAKE MODL CID
293 75 FORD LTD 460
AFTER MTCE.
291 75 LINC CONT 460
AFTER MTCE.
295 75 MERC MONA 302
AFTER MTCE.
297 75 MERC MONT 351
AFTER MTCE.
298 75 MERC COUG 351
AFTER MTCE.
*
TEST TYPE
HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
HC
2.56
1 .75
2.14
1 .76
1 .24
1.49
1 .72
0.97
1.33
2.18
0.97
1 .55
2.29
0.84
1.53
1.87
0.79
1.31
1.30
1 .10
1 .20
1 .22
1 .22
1 .22
1 .96
1 .55
1.75
1 .48
1.32
1 .40
R A MQ P
n M n o r
CO
49.0
65.6
57.7
23.0
15.0
18.9
31.5
38.2
35.0
30.5
31.7
31.1
51.1
43.9
47.4
45.9
23.8
34.4
35.7
32.9
34.2
31.0
26.5
28.7
44.7
49.0
46.9
31.3
24.4
27.7
ER MT T P
n n x LI EJ
C02
671 .7
753.0
714.1
663.2
743.8
705.2
743.5
830.7
789.0
737.9
797.4
768.9
513.2
611.4
564.4
525.9
604.9
567.1
604.8
660.4
633.8
624.4
682.2
654.6
599.8
641.4
621 .5
717.7
783.0
751.8
NOXC
2.55
1 .21
1.85
2.60
1 .57
2.06
2.28
1 .04
1.63
2.43'
1 .08
1 .72
0.67
0.39
0.52
0.72
0.47
0.59
1.89
0.94
1 .39
2.98
1 .59
2.25
2.66
1.45
2.03
2.22
1.75
1.98
MPG
KTT PI
r u c. L
ECON
11.7
10.3
10.9
12.6
11 .5
12.0
11.1
9.9
10.5
11 .2
10.4
10.8
14.8
13.0
13.8
14.7
13.8
14.2
13.3
12.4
12.8
13.1
12.2
12.6
13.1
12.3
12.7
11.5
10.8
11.1
K-19
-------
APPENDIX K.CONT'D
LISTING OF 1972 FEDERAL HOT START TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO.
300
303
307
308
309
YR MAKE MODL CID TEST TYPE
75 OLDS OMEG 260 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
75 OLDS STAW 350 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
75 PLYM DUST 225 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
75 PLYM SCAM 318 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
75 PLYM VALI 318 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
n
HC
2
1
1
1
1
1
3
3
3
2
0
1
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
.01
.34
.66
.47
.09
.27
.60
.93
.77
.19
.91
.52
.83
.27
.06
.15
.47
.32
.47
.83
.14
.31
.74
.02
.50
.58
.54
.89
.69
.78
RAMS P
CO
58
39
48
45
31
38
75
76
76
49
24
36
39
64
52
33
37
35
17
23
20
12
23
18
33
59
47
11
20
16
.3
.1
.3
.9
.8
.5
.7
.7
.2
. 1
.7
.4
.9
.4
.6
.7
.4
.6
.8
.5
.8
.8
.9
.6
.7
.2
.0
.8
.2
.2
ER MILE
C02 NOXC
486
540
514
487
523
506
465
476
471
522
568
546
377
372
375
411
423
417
528
568
549
549
584
568
512
539
526
520
559
541
.8
.1
.6
.5
.7
.4
.4
.1
.0
.4
.3
.3
.7
.5
.0
.8
.4
.8
.8
.5
.5
.6
.9
.0
.7
.3
.6
.8
.9
.2
1
0
1
1
0
1
1
0
1
0
0
0
2
1
2
1
1
1
1
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
1
1
0
1
.73
.89
.29
.38
.81
.08
.13
.90
.01
.99'
.68
.83
.17
.84
.00
.42
.13
.27
.18
,29
.71
.33
.29
A
.78
.57
ii ft
.47
.00
.58
ii O
.48
n 1
.01
MPG
FUEL
ECON
15,
11,
11,
15.
15,
15.
11,
11,
11,
11,
11.
11,
19,
18.
19,
19,
18.
18.
15.
11.
4 p
15.
15.
j Ii
11,
1 '
15,
1 j i
in
I1*,
16,
11.
i ^ •
15,
i y •
2
6
9
7
i|
5
9
6
7
6
5
6
9
5
1
0
2
6
8
5
6
9
/
7
(
II
9
6
K-20
-------
APPENDIX K.CONT'D
TSTING OF 1972 FEDERAL HOT START TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO,
310
311
312
313
314
YR MAKE MODL CID TEST TYPE
75 PLYM FURY 318 HOT
HOT
72
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
72
75 PLYM FURY 360 HOT
HOT
72
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
72
75 PLYM FURY 400 HOT
HOT
72
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
72
75 PLYM FURY 360 HOT
HOT
72
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
72
75 PONT ASTR 140 HOT
HOT
72
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
72
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
2
3
3
0
0
0
3
2
2
2
2
2
4
4
4
3
3
3
3
2
2
2
0
1
3
2
3
1
0
1
HC
.67
.75
.23
.79
.80
.80
.38
.43
.88
.80
.04
.41
.39
.35
.37
.79
.52
.65
.02
.30
.64
.48
.89
.65
.44
.84
.12
.52
.98
.24
JRAMS P
CO
38
75
57
9
17
13
100
66
83
104
53
77
82
74
78
82
71
77
76
57
66
84
25
54
69
96
83
39
32
35
.9
.0
.7
.0
.4
.4
.9
.6
.0
.3
.1
.6
.4
.2
.2
.9
.9
.1
.3
.5
.5
.7
.9
.1
.4
.0
.3
.5
.2
.7
ER MILE
C02
499
500
500
550
597
575
469
463
466
495
596
548
573
600
587
592
645
620
497
570
535
542
637
592
317
311
314
346
379
363
.3
.9
.1
.9
.1
.0
.1
.8
.3
.4
.8
.3
.7
.2
.5
.6
.7
.3
.0
.0
.0
.4
.8
.1
.3
.1
.1
.1
.4
.4
NOXC
2
1
1
2
0
1
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
.08
.05
.55
.17
.72
.41
.73
.01
.35
.23
.87
.04
.94
.39
.65
.43
.99
.20
.86
.07
.45
.19
.95
.07
.12
.45
.77
.62
.32
.47
MPG
FUEL
ECON
15.6
14.1
14.8
15.6
14.2
14.8
13.9
15.4
14.6
13.3
12.9
13.1
12.4
12.1
12.3
12.1
11 .5
11.8
14.2
13.3
13.7
13.0
13.0
13.0
20.3
18.8
19.5
21 .5
20.5
21 .0
K-21
-------
APPENDIX K.CONT'D
LISTING OF 1972 FEDERAL HOT START TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO.
316
318
320
321
322
YR MAKE MODL CID TEST TYPE
75 PONT LEMA 350 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
75 PONT LEMA 350 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
75 PONT STAW 400 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
75 PONT GRNV 455 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
75 AUDI FOX 97 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
n
HC
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
1
2
0
1
1
0
0
1
0
0
1
1
1
1
2
1
.47
.87
.16
.28
.56
.90
.71
.28
.48
.75
.40
.57
.10
.58
.31
.27
.60
.40
.52
.41
.94
.11
.43
.75
.63
.48
.55
.71
.05
.89
RAMS P
CO
43
29
35
38
17
27
9
1
5
11
3
7
82
23
51
77
21
48
39
20
29
41
18
29
11
5
8
4
3
4
.1
.3
.9
.5
.4
.5
.1
.4
.1
.3
.3
.1
.8
.3
.8
.8
.7
.5
.7
.5
.7
.2
.8
.5
.0
.4
.1
.8
.3
.0
C02
533
611
573
531
610
572
541
616
580
515
564
540
593
682
639
608
676
644
658
727
694
663
752
709
304
375
341
319
390
356
.1
.0
.7
.9
.4
.8
.6
.3
.5
.0
.4
.8
.0
.0
.4
.7
.4
.0
.4
.4
.3
.2
.1
.5
.2
.0
.1
.5
.4
.4
NOXC
1
1
1
1
1
1
5
5
5
5
4
5
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
1
1
0
1
1
0
1
.62
.13
.36
.57
.48
.52
.93
.32
.61
.82
.70
.23
.68
.84
.76
.42
.36
.39
.33
.82
.06
.44
.95
- Q
.18
.42
O ft
.89
.15
.72
/* t
.97
30
.35
MPG
FUEL
ECOX
11
13
1ft
11
13
11
15
11
15
16
15
16
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
11
11
12
4 4
1 1
\ 1
1 1
27
22
(»(•
26
22
C**
21
,7
.5
.0
.9
.9
,3
,9
,3
,0
,6
,5
,0
,2
.3
,2
,0
,5
,2
,2
.
,1
7
I 1
,2
,9
,7
.7
,1
,1
K-22
-------
APPENDIX K.CONT'D
TSTING OF 1972 FEDERAL HOT START TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO. YR MAKE MODL CID
123 76 CAPR GHIA 171
J»- J '
AFTER MTCE.
325 75 COLT SEDA 98
AFTER MTCE.
326 75 DATS 710 119
AFTER MTCE.
327 75 DATS B210 85
AFTER MTCE.
328 75 DATS SEDA 119
AFTER MTCE.
*
TEST TYPE
HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
HC
1 .82
3.90
2.90
1 .28
0.45
0.85
3.09
1 .80
2.42
2.55
1 .49
2.00
2.77
1.91
2.32
3.07
3.01
3.04
1.86
1 .44
1 .64
1.69
1 .46
1.57
2.11
1.94
2.02
1 .83
1.53
1 .67
;RAM*? P
I II M 1 1O i
CO
46.0
136.8
93.3
11 .5
3.6
7.4
45.1
40.6
42.7
37.1
31.6
34.3
43.4
38.4
40.8
38.9
35.2
37.0
23.1
24.1
23.6
23.4
22.6
23.0
39.4
36.4
37.9
37.3
34.0
35.6
PR MT T p
on 1 1 JL LI EJ
C02
422.3
344.8
381.9
477.6
556.4
518.7
350.1
425.0
389.2
352.7
432.2
394.1
295.7
333.3
315.3
295.7
345.6
321.7
266.8
307.0
287.7
271.9
310.3
291 .9
321.5
312.0
316.6
342.6
335.7
339.0
NOXC
0.85
0.53
0.68
1 .00
0.58
0.78
1.17
0.69
0.92
1.43
0.86
1.13
2.59
1 .46
2.00
1.94
1 .12
1 .51
2.39
1 .06
1 .70
2.52
1.14
1 .80
2.36
1.92
2.13
1.66
1.34
1.49
MPG
PFIPT
r u Hi LI
ECON
17.7
15.5
16.5
17.8
15.7
16.7
20.6
17.9
19.1
21 .2
18.2
19.5
23.8
22.2
22.9
24.2
21.6
22.8
28.7
25.4
26.9
28.3
25.3
26.6
22.8
23.6
23.2
21 .8
22.5
22.2
K-23
-------
APPENDIX K.CONT'D
LISTING OF 1972 FEDERAL HOT START TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO.
YR MAKE MODL CID TEST
TYPE
HC
-GRAMS
CO
PER MILE
C02 NOXC
HPG
FUEL
ECON
329 75 FIAT STAW 78 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
330 75 FIAT X1-9 79 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
331 75 BOND CVCC 91 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
332 75 MAZD RX3
70 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
333 75 MAZD RX3
70 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
2.32 42.8 300.3 6,43 23?
1.62 37.8 340.2 2.71 2H
1.95 40.2 321.1 4,49 22*?
2.01 28.2
1.47 23.1
1.73 25.5
0.66 23.6
0.22 7.3
0.43 15.1
0.54 20.3
0.22 6.5
0.37 13.1
353.5 0.91 22.0
404.2 0,72 19,9
379.9 0.82 20,9
344.1
406.6
376.7
342.5
398.5
371.7
1,75 23,2
1.22 21,2
1,17 22,1
2.24 23,6
1,52 21,7
1,87 22.6
1.50 9.9 262.9 2,06 31,3
1.18 8.6 298.3 1.21 28.1
1.33 9.2 281.3 1.62 29,6
N/A
N/A
N/A
2.17 12.5
0.10 6.6
1.09 9.4
552.3 0,82 15,3
710.8 0,46 •
634.9 0.63 13.»
4.52 17.8 497.5 0.8 •
7.74 54.0 527.8 0,51 -j
6.20 36.7 513.3 0.67 "•
2.82 13.4 951.8 0.84 9^
0.21 3.8 1189.2 0.1J 8|,
1.46 8.4 1075.6 O.o*
2.68 18.8 544.9
0.10 5.7 691.7
1.33 12.0 621.4
0.92 J;
0.5
0.7*
K-24
-------
APPENDIX K.CONT'D
• TSTING OF 1972 FEDERAL
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICL
HOT START TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
LES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
N0l YR MAKE MODL CID
115 75 MG MGB 1 10
J J J '
AFTER MTCE.
336 75 OPEL STAW 1 16
AFTER MTCE.
338 75 PORS 911S 164
AFTER MTCE.
3*0 75 TOYO CELI 133
AFTER MTCE.
341 75 TOYO CORO 97
AFTER MTCE.
•*
TEST TYPE
HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72* FTP
HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
HC
0.94
0.57
0.75
0.97
0.57
0.76
2.30
2.01
2.15
2.10
1 .72
1 .90
2.05
2.06
2.06
1 .01
0.88
0.94
2.13
2.14
2.14
1 .76
1 .84
1 .80
2.12
1.35
1 .72
1 .49
0/92
1.19
RAMS PER MILE
CO C02
27.0
15.3
20.9
30.4
19.5
24.7
44.0
43.6
43.8
32.2
27.2
29.6
25.6
28.8
27.3
28.9
25.6
27.2
15.0
21 .0
18.1
20.4
24.8
22.7
27.2
26.0
26.6
21.9
21.5
21.7
381.8
469.9
427.7
389.2
468.6
430.6
357.0
371 .7
364.6
374.3
393.8
384.5
364.7
453.3
410.9
415.0
504.3
461.5
350.8
402.3
377.7
366.1
427.5
398.1
308.0
366.7
338.6
320.7
378.7
350.9
NOXC
0.87
0.61
0.73
0.81
0.57
0.69
2.05
0.88
1.44
2.43
1 .09
1.73
1.30
0.92
1.11
1 .39
0.97
1.17
3.59
1.53
2.52
3.75
1.67
2.66
2.96
1.21
2.05
2.59
1 .22
1.87
MPG
FUEL
ECON
20.8
17.9
19.2
20.2
17.7
18.8
20.5
19.9
20.2
20.6
20.1
20.3
21.6
17.6
19.3
19.1
16.2
17.5
23.3
20.1
21 .5
22.0
18.8
20.2
24.8
21.6
23.0
24.7
21 .4
22.8
K-25
-------
APPENDIX K.CONT'D
LISTING OF 1972 FEDERAL HOT START TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO. YR MAKE MODL CID TEST TYPE
up/i
GRAMS PER MILE FUEL
HC CO C02 NOXC ECON
342
75 VOLK SEDA 97 HOT
HOT
TRANS
STAB
72 FTP
343
345
511
512
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
72
75 VOLK RABB 90 HOT
HOT
72
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
72
75 VOLV SEDA 121 HOT
HOT
72
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
72
75 FORD GRAN 200 HOT
HOT
72
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
72
75 MERC MONA 250 HOT
HOT
72
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
72
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
2.
2.
2.
2.
3.
2.
2.
2.
2.
3.
3.
3.
2.
1.
1 .
1.
0.
1 .
1 .
0.
0.
1 .
0.
1 .
0.
0.
0.
1 .
0.
0.
46
93
71
31
46
91
33
47
41
48
36
42
38
51
92
87
54
18
03
71
86
87
75
29
99
26
61
01
19
58
22
18
20
14
18
16
53
42
47
65
60
62
71
56
63
68
45
56
31
28
29
38
31
35
33
4
18
27
3
15
.3
.9
.5
.9
.2
.6
.6
.2
.7
.7
.3
.9
.6
.8
.9
.4
.5
.4
.3
.1
.6
.9
.3
.0
.0
'.2
.0
.8
.6
.1
259
300
281
282
314
299
244
289
268
232
259
246
356
416
387
439
514
478
483
565
526
449
507
479
552
592
573
593
635
615
.9
.8
.2
.5
.1
.0
.6
.6
.1
.7
.0
.4
.3
.4
.6
.6
.7
.8
.3
.4
.1
.2
.4
.6
.3
.6
.3
.1
.1
.0
2
1
1
2
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
1
1
1
,00
.59
.79
.12
.61
.85
.95
.70
.82
.82
.51
.66
.21
.56
.87
,76
M
.58
,02
.65
.82
.71
,49
.59
f C
.65
+ «•
.65
.16
r 4
.51
•
29,3
26,1
27,6
28,3
25,1
26,6
26, \
2U
25,3
25,6
2U
2U
18,6
17.1
18,0
16,1
15,1
15,5
16,6
. 1, r
14,5
4 r h
15, "i
17,2
15,''
1 A S
\Vi'
1J'g
ill 1
1 1, i
13-5
13.8
i J *
13-5
K-26
-------
APPENDIX K.CONT'D
TING OF 1972 FEDERAL HOT START TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO.
513
514
515
516
517
YR MAKE MODL CID TEST TYPE
75 OLDS OMEG 250 HOT TRANS
HOT
72
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
72
75 PLYM GRNF 400 HOT
HOT
72
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
72
75 PONT VENT 250 HOT
HOT
72
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
72
75 BMW SEDA 121 HOT
HOT
72
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
72
75 BMW 5301 182 HOT
HOT
72
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
72
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
HC
1.53
0.77
1 .13
1 .84
1 .47
1 .65
3.95
4.59
4.28
1.25
0.51
0.87
0.90
0.28
0.58
1 .00
0.31
0.64
1 .16
0.19
0.65
N/A
N/A
N/A
2.13
4.70
3.47
N/A
N/A
N/A
JRAMS P
CO
33
10
21
55
23
38
118
136
127
62
33
47
29
6
17
34
8
21
9
6
7
46
61
54
.9
.8
.9
.0
.9
.8
.1
.7
.8
.3
.4
.2
.9
.9
.9
.7
.8
.2
.1
.8
.9
.0
.8
.2
ER MILE
C02
463
526
496
432
441
437
563
628
597
641
743
694
415
436
426
493
535
515
413
506
461
602
722
665
.9
.7
.6
.8
.2
.2
.3
.0
.0
.4
.1
.4
.9
.3
.6
.4
.1
.1
.1
.5
.8
.5
.8
.2
NOXC
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
.86
.43
.16
.34
.80
.58
.58
.09
.32
t
.84
.61
.72
.32
.91
.63
.26
.12
.19
.09
.58
.82
.58
.41
.49
MPG
FUEL
ECON
17
16
16
16
18
17
11
10
10
1 1
1 1
1 1
19
19
19
16
16
16
20
17
18
13
10
11
.0
.3
.6
.9
.4
.6
.7
.4
.9
.9
.1
.5
.1
.8
.4
.1
.1
.1
.6
.1
.6
.0
.6
.7
K-27
-------
APPENDIX K.CONT'D
LISTING OF 1972 FEDERAL HOT START TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO.
518
YR MAKE MODL CID TEST TYPE
75 SUBA STAW 83 HOT
HOT
TRANS
STAB
72 FTP
•
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
TRANS
STAB
72 FTP
519
520
521
522
75 MERE 450S 276 HOT
HOT
72
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
72
75 PORS 914 120 HOT
HOT
72
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
72
75 SAAB 99LE 121 HOT
HOT
72
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
72
75 AMMO HORN 232 HOT
HOT
72
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
72
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
GRAMS PER MILE
HC CO C02 NOXC
3
2
2
2
3
3
1
0
0
1
0
0
1
1
1
N
N
.01
.83
.92
.97
.04
.01
.07
.77
.91
.07
.66
.85
.43
.80
.62
/A
/A
25
24
25
27
24
25
9
1 1
10
9
8
9
24
25
24
.2
.8
.0
.2
.5
.8
.9
.5
.7
.7
.5
.0
.3
.5
.9
267
297
283
259
290
276
601
693
649
607
707
659
327
405
367
.4
.6
.2
.9
.7
.0
.4
.5
.4
.5
.0
.4
.4
.1
.9
2
1
2
2
1
1
2
0
1
2
1
1
1
0
1
.96
,52
.21
.55
.12
.96
.72
.91
.79,
.79
.11
.91
.56
.99
.26
MPG
FUEL
ECON
28.0
25,7
26.8
28. i|
26,2
27,2
11,3
12.1
13.3
11.2
12.3
13,1
21,0
19,7
21.5
N/A
2
3
3
.76
.24
.01
17
24
21
.8
.3
.2
298
320
310
.8
.8
.3
3
1
2
.10
.95
.65
26,1
I. A
21,0
/\r 1
25,'
N/A
N
/A
N/A
2
2
2
2
1
2
.37
.12
.24
.20
.84
.01
33
26
30
38
27
32
.7
.9
.1
.2
.4
.6
364
376
370
396
416
407
.5
.0
.5
.9
.3
.0
3
3
3
2
2
2
.27
_ f
.56
.12
.1*
f\ 4
.23
• ' *
20,9
?0,9
£ v t *
on Q
i\i>i
1Q.1
1 J •
19-1
K-28
-------
APPENDIX K.CONT'D
TNG OF 1972 FEDERAL HOT START TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO,
523
524
525
534
535
YR MAKE MODL CID TEST TYPE
75 AMMO HORN 258 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
75 DODG MONA 440 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
75 MERC MARQ 460 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
75 AMMO GREM 232 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
™ AMMO HORN 232 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
0
0
0
1
0
1
1
0
1
3
3
3
3
2
2
2
1
2
2
1
1
HC
.59
.50
.54
.42
.15
.28
.56
.20
.37
.83
.18
.49
.59
.87
.22
.88
.75
.29
.40
.22
.31
.04
.46
.74
.26
.99
.12
.19
.77
.97
RAMS PER MILE
CO C02
61
49
55
58
30
43
46
44
45
20
5
12
18
22
20
13
13
13
43
59
52
37
35
36
41
34
37
40
25
32
.6
.2
.1
.1
.5
.7
.9
.5
.6
.3
.4
.5
.3
.3
.4
.6
.0
.3
.5
.8
.0
.1
.1
.0
.7
.2
.8
.6
.7
.8
472
507
490
475
513
495
609
657
634
697
799
751
740
842
793
719
828
776
301
314
308
313
350
332
384
399
392
374
398
386
.1
.9
.8
.2
.9
.4
.5
. 1
.3
.8
.8
.0
.3
.2
.4
.0
.4
.0
.0
.7
.2
.3
.4
.6
.6
.9
.6
.8
.0
.9
NOXC
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
2
2
1
1
3
1
2
2
1
2
2
1
2
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
.10
.04
.07
.18
.29
.24
.75
.51
.11
.22
.61
.90
.00
.65
.30
.82
.63
.20
.29
.86
.06
.56
.31
-43
.71
.53
.62
.77
.48
.62
MPG
FUEL
ECON
15
15
15
15
15
15
12
12
12
12
1 1
1 1
11
10
10
11
10
11
23
21
22
23
21
22
19
19
19
19
20
20
.4
.0
.2
.5
.6
.5
.8
. 1
.4
.1
.0
.5
.5
.1
.7
.9
.4
.1
.3
.2
.2
.3
.5
.3
.4
.3
.3
.9
.0
.0
K-29
-------
APPENDIX K.CONT'D
LISTING OF 1972 FEDERAL HOT START TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO.
536
•
538
540
544
547
YR MAKE MODL CID TEST TYPE
75 AMMO PACE 258 HOT
HOT
72
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
72
75 AMMO HORN 232 HOT
HOT
72
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
72
75 AMMO PACE 258 HOT
HOT
72
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
72
75 BUIC LESA 350 HOT
HOT
72
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
72
75 BUIC REGA 350 HOT
HOT
72
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
72
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
GRAMS P
HC CO
3.
2.
2.
2.
2.
2.
2.
2.
2.
2.
1 .
1.
2.
2.
2.
3.
2.
2.
2.
2.
2.
0.
0.
0.
2.
2.
2.
1 .
0.
1 .
10
58
83
55
14
34
57
01
28
06
50
77
43
05
23
01
71
85
47
70
59
91
50
70
43
91
68
46
70
06
78
92
86
52
59
56
40
37
38
34
26
30
39
49
44
139
135
137
69
80
75
29
18
23
79
78
78
32
19
25
.9
.9
.2
.7
.0
.0
.1
.4
.7
.5
.3
.2
.8
.3
.8
.9
.6
.7
.6
.2
.1
.5
.8
.9
.0
.5
.7
.5
.3
.7
ER MILE
C02
417
421
419
449
442
446
385
421
404
390
417
404
433
445
439
490
520
506
550
563
557
608
647
629
490
552
522
545
601
574
.8
.0
.5
.8
.7
.1
.1
.8
.2
.4
.1
.3
.5
.2
.6
.6
.2
.0
.6
.1
.1
.7
.7
.0
.2
.8
.8
.6
.8
.9
NOXC
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
2
0
0
0
1
0
1
1
0
0
1
1
1
1
0
1
.71
.07
.38
.01
.39
.69
.88
.71
.80
.66
.81
.71
.98
.91
.11
.93
.95
.91
.51
.73
.12
.19
.55
/\ f
.86
.16
nt.
.06
.25
.32
A f\
.89
• *
HPG
FUEL
ECON
16.1
15. 1
15,?
16, »
16,1
16,11
19,5
18,2
' 18,8
19.1
19.2
19."
17,6
16,8
17,2
12,3
12,0
12.1
13.3
in 1
12,1
1 1 A
13,"
13.5
*'.
1? 0
i )•
13>5
14,8
111,0
I • •
11,3
£-30
-------
APPENDIX K.CONT'D
.TSTING OF 1972 FEDERAL
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICL
HOT START TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
N0. YR MAKE MODL CID
5119 75 BUIC LESA 350
AFTER MTCE.
550 75 BUIC LESA 350
AFTER MTCE.
551 75 BUIC LESA 455
AFTER MTCE.
553 75 BUIC RIVI 455
AFTER MTCE.
554 75 BUIC STAW 455
AFTER MTCE.
-•
TEST TYPE
HOT
HOT
72
HOT
HOT
72
HOT
HOT
72
HOT
HOT
72
HOT
HOT
72
HOT
HOT
72
HOT
HOT
72
HOT
HOT
72
HOT
HOT
72
HOT
HOT
72
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
r
HC
1 .
2.
1 .
1 .
0.
0.
3.
3.
3.
2.
2.
2.
3.
3.
3.
2.
2.
2.
2.
4.
3.
1 .
1 .
1 .
4.
4.
4.
3.
r.
2.
46
17
83
12
21
64
31
44
38
05
07
06
94
94
94
42
19
30
90
27
62
86
63
74>
34
29
31
50
90
66
}RAMS PER MILE
CO C02
50
51
50
39
15
26
102
126
114
67
48
57
69
90
80
52
49
50
76
133
106
39
37
38
103
1 12
108
118
52
84
.7
. 1
.9
.2
.5
.8
.1
.7
.9
.4
.4
.5
.9
.2
.5
.1
.7
.8
.0
.5
.0
.8
.4
.6
.6
.8
.4
.9
.2
.1
609
619
614
614
686
652
524
529
526
571
635
604
550
577
564
605
665
636
635
622
628
655
691
674
610
638
625
663
727
696
.1
.6
.6
.3
.7
.1
.4
.0
.8
.7
.3
.8
.3
.4
.4
.0
.2
.4
.6
.8
.9
.8
.6
.5
.4
.4
.0
.4
.3
.7
NOXC
2
2
2
0
0
0
1
0
1
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
1
0
1
1
0
0
1
0
1
1
0
1
.10
.12
.11
.99
.41
.68
.39
.72
.04 -
.67
.27
.46
.79
.76
.25
.25
.69
.96
.37
.75
.05
.18
.72
.94
.90
.93
.39
.43
.89
.15
MPG
FUEL
ECON
12.8
12.6
12.7
13.1
12.5
12.7
12.8
12.0
12.4
13.0
12.4
12.6
13.2
12.1
12.6
12.8
11.8
12.3
11 .6
10.5
11.0
12.3
11 .7
12.0
11.3
10.7
1 1 .0
10.3
10.9
10.6
K-31
-------
APPENDIX K.CONT'D
LISTING OF 1972 FEDERAL HOT START TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO.
559
YR MAKE MODL CID TEST TYPE
75 CADI ELDO 500 HOT
HOT
TRANS
STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
TRANS
STAB
72 FTP
560
565
567
568
75 CADI DEVI 500 HOT
HOT
72
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
72
75 CHEV VEGA 140 HOT
HOT
72
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
72
75 CHEV VEGA 140 HOT
HOT
72
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
72
\
75 CHEV VEGA 140 HOT
HOT
72
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
72
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
GRAMS P
HC CO
4
5
4
3
1
2
3
4
3
2
1
2
4
5
4
1
2
2
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
2
1
0
0
0
.33
.08
.72
.09
.63
.33
.52
.19
.87
.56
.97
.25
.13
.34
.76
.79
.20
.00
.96
.19
.08
.15
.02
.08
.48
.13
.82
.97
.84
.90
134
134
134
101
37
68
62
79
71
91
59
74
61
82
72
32
31
32
47
59
54
28
29
28
38
59
49
19
23
22
.3
.5
.4
.9
.5
.3
.0
.7
.2
.6
.1
.6
.9
.8
.8
.8
.7
.2
.8
.7
.0
.0
.6
.8
.7
.8
.7
.9
.9
.0
ER MILE
C02 NOXC
546
581
564
599
686
645
570
577
574
594
651
624
276
324
301
320
384
353
374
380
377
387
415
402
381
367
374
388
375
381
.7
.3
.8
.9
.8
.2
.7
.5
.3
.7
.4
.3
.9
.5
.7
.0
.6
.7
.4
.4
.5
.8
.0
.0
.4
.5
.1
.4
.3
.6
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
c
0
0
0
0
0
0
,31
.68
.50
.03
.51
.28
.87
.02
.95
.28
.34
.31
.70
.17
.42
.08
.96
.02
.07
.46
.75
.88
.44
.65
.68
r C
.55
f A
.61
.70
/% A
.22
•
HPG
FUEL
ECON
11,5
11,0
11,2
11,5
11,8
11,?
13,1
12.11
- 12.7
11,9
11,8
11,9
22.9
18,8
20.6
23,5
20,1
/
21,6
19.5
. 0 *
18,1
18,7
10 1
I?,1
10 I
1 J * '
19,9
19,0
1 / '
21,1
21."
(• * •
21-2
K-32
-------
APPENDIX K.CONT'D
tTSTlNG OF 1972 FEDERAL HOT START TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO,
569
570
571
580
581
YR MAKE MODL CID TEST TYPE
75 CHEV VEGA 140 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
75 CHEV MONZ 140 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
75 CHEV VEGA 140 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
75 CHEV NOVA 350 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
75 CHEV NOVA 350 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
1
1
1
1
0
0
2
2
2
1
1
1
3
4
3
4
4
4
3
3
3
1
1
1
2
3
3
4
1
3
HC
.82
.58
.69
.04
.45
.74
.04
.13
.08
.33
.12
.22
.31
.13
.74
.28
.89
.60
.50
.42
.46
.15
.70
.44
.89
.44
.18
.46
.71
.03
}RAMS P
CO
37
52
45
23
18
20
46
57
52
29
27
28
63
82
73
66
70
68
64
88
76
29
40
35
85
122
104
51
50
50
.6
.1
.2
.1
.5
.7
.3
.5
.1
.2
.9
.5
.3
.6
.4
. 1
.7
.5
.0
.7
.9
.0
.7
.1
.2
.2
.5
.5
.3
.8
ER MILE
C02
365
354
359
378
407
393
363
365
364
393
409
401
280
318
299
272
334
304
445
469
458
513
561
538
510
564
538
536
591
565
.1
.4
.5
. 1
.4
.4
.6
.7
.7
.2
.4
.7
.0
.3
.9
.3
.4
.7
.9
.9
.4
.8
.8
.8
.7
.4
.7
.5
.4
.1
NOXC
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
1
0
0
2
1
1
1
0
0
.76
.38
.56
.61
.33
.46
.19
.78
.98.
.15
.43
.78
.05
.76
.90
.92
.80
.86
.77
.80
.27
.08
.54
.80
.18
.01
.57
.12
.59
.85
MPG
FUEL
ECON
20
20
20
21
20
20
20
19
19
20
19
19
22
19
20
22
19
20
15
14
15
15
14
14
13
11
12
14
13
13
.6
,1
.4
.3
.3
.7
.0
.2
.6
.0
.4
.7
.8
.2
.8
.8
.3
.8
.9
.3
.0
.8
. 1
.8
.6
.6
.4
.1
.1
.6
K-33
-------
APPENDIX K.CONT'D
LISTING OF 1972 FEDERAL HOT START TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO.
582
•
583
588
589
591
YR MAKE MODL CID TEST TYPE
75 CHEV NOVA 350 HOT
HOT
72
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
72
75 CHEV NOVA 350 HOT
HOT
72
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
72
75 CHEV MONT 350 HOT
HOT
72
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
72
75 CHEV MALI 350 HOT
HOT
72
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
72
75 CHEV MONT 350 HOT
HOT
72
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
79
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
RTP
GRAMS PER MILE
HC CO C02 NOXC
1
2
2
1
0
1
4
4
4
3
3
3
1
2
2
1
1
1
3
4
4
2
2
2
4
5
4
3
2
9
.90
.27
.09
.33
.71
.01
.10
.35
.23
.46
.21
.33
.84
.71
.29
.58
.35
.46
.17
.93
.08
.29
.27
.28
.81
.06
.94
.08
.21
fi9
50
52
51
42
22
31
96
89
92
71
49
60
50
76
64
29
35
32
95
153
125
87
83
85
147
153
150
133
80
m^
.0
.8
.5
.0
.3
.7
.3
.9
.9
.7
.6
.1
.6
.4
.1
.7
.7
.9
.5
.4
.7
.3
.7
.4
.7
.9
.9
.4
.1
6
490
528
510
506
567
538
444
483
464
447
482
465
511
534
523
501
526
514
446
440
443
511
544
528
423
445
435
513
615
566
.4
.8
.4
.8
.5
.4
.7
.6
.9
.7
.2
.7
.8
.2
.5
.2
.7
.5
.9
.8
.7
.9
.5
.9
.9
.2
.0
.6
.2
.6
1
0
1
1
0
0
1
0
1
1
0
0
1
1
1
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.59
.92
,24
.11
.60
.84
.21
.80
.00
.09
.67
.87
.65
.05
.34
.02
.53
.76
.02
.50
.75
.69
.42
.55
.70
1, ii
,44
_ r
.56
.59
c f\
.50
.54
MPG
FUEL
ECON
15.4
11,3
11,8
15,1
11,1
15,0
11,5
13,9
11,2
15,5
15.6
15.5
11.9
13,^
11.1
16.0
15.1
15,5
A rt 7
12,7
d o ft
13. D
13.5
13-2
13-2
12,6
1 1* *
12,9
iti>
12,1
11.5
12.0
K-34
-------
APPENDIX K.CONT'D
TING op ^72 FEDERAL HOT START TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO, YR MAKE MODL CID
592 75 CHEV MONT 350
AFTER MTCE.
593 75 CHEV MALI 350
AFTER MTCE.
591 75 CHEV MONT 350
AFTER MTCE.
595 75 CHEV MALI 350
AFTER MTCE.
596 75 CHEV STAW 350
AFTER MTCE.
-*
TEST TYPE
HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
r
HC
2.41
2.92
2.68
1.33
0.23
0.75
2.70
3.36
3.05
0.89
0.78
0.83
2.45
2.89
2.68
1 .50
0.54
1 .00
2.00
2.29
2.15
1 .52
0.76
1.12
2.55
3.31
2.94
0.80
0.54
0.66
3D A MQ P
Ii rl ™1 0 r
CO
71.6
88.2
80.2
37.7
9.7
23.1
77.0
87.5
82.5
32.2
18.8
25.2
66.5
101 .9
85.0
43.8
39.0
41.3
50.1
48.5
49.2
55.7
27.1
40.8
83.6
106.2
95.3
33.7
15.4
24.1
ER MT I P
n ii u. LI n
C02
461.8
478.0
470.2
539.4
631.7
587.5
483.2
481.8
482.5
538.0
602.5
571 .6
467.7
479.5
473.9
602.9
650.4
627.7
522.5
571.3
547.9
514.4
582.8
550.0
548.6
557.7
553.4
572.7
629.6
602.3
NOXC
1 .20
0.60
0.89
0.83
0.64
0.74
1.34
0.82
1 .07
1.19
0.77
0.97
0.92
0.50
0.70
0.86
0.39
0.61
1.53
1 .05
1 .28
1 .17
0.76
0.96
1.38
0.88
1.12
1.55
1.34
1.44
MPG
PMC1!
r U Ei JL
ECON
15.2
14.2
14.7
14.7
13.7
14.2
14.5
14.1
14.3
15.0
14.0
14.5
15.3
13.7
14.4
13.1
12.4
12.8
14.6
13.6
14.0
14.6
14.1
14.4
12.9
12.1
12.5
14.1
13.5
13.8
K-35
-------
APPENDIX K.CONT'D
LISTING OF 1972 FEDERAL HOT START TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO. YR MAKE MODL CID TEST TYPE
598 75 CHEV NOVA 350 HOT
HOT
72
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
72
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
3
4
4
2
1
1
GRAMS P
HC CO
.82
.72
.29
.03
.91
.97
98
127
113
76
70
73
.8
.2
.6
.4
.3
.2
ER MILE
C02 NOXC
421
427
424
461
490
476
.9
.7
.9
.1
.1
.2
1
0
1
0
0
0
.43
,60
.00
.91
.36
.64
HPC
FUEL
ECOI
15,1
13,8
11,1
15,1
1U
11,9
599 75 CHEV MONT 350 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE.
HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
600 75 CHEV MALI 350 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
608 75 CHEV CAPR 454 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
609 75 CHRY CORD 360 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
1.63 36.0
2.35 69.5
2.01 53.5
1.72 33.2
1.66 45.2
1.69 39.4
482.8 3.^8 16,3
477.7 1.75 11,9
480.1 2.58 15,6
513.5 1.38 '15,5
535.4 0,71 11,5
524.9 1.03 15,0
2
1
1
3
4
4
2
1
1
2
1
6
1
0
1
2
2
2
1
1
1
.80
.65
.25
.11
.80
.95
.76
.65
.97
.94
.58
.23
.50
.30
.40
.70
.10
.39
74
120
98
46
33
39
87
10
46
42
0
20
82
72
77
72
42
56
.5
.2
.3
.5
.3
.6
.0
.1
.9
.7
.4
.6
.5
.5
.3
.2
.3
.7
434
431
432
489
544
518
778
888
835
747
864
808
491
537
515
536
641
591
.3
.2
.7
.6
.7
.3
.0
.7
.7
.4
.8
.6
.0
.9
.4
.0
.6
.0
1
0
1
1
0
1
2
2
2
2
1
2
1
0
1
0
0
0
.71
.66
.16
41
JO
.09
.72
.58
.64
.39
.81
.09
.63
.84
— /*
.22
.96
.53
.74
15,8
11.0
11,8
15,6
11.1
15.1
9.0
9h
,'
93
,2
10,8
10.2
10.5
11.1
13,5
12*,5
13,J
K-36
-------
APPENDIX K.CONT'D
NG OK 1972 FEDERAL HOT START TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO.
610
611
613
615
616
YR MAKE MODL CID TEST TYPE
75 CHRY CORD 360 HOT
HOT
72
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
72
75 CHRY NEWP MOO HOT
HOT
72
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
72
75 CHRY NEWP 400 HOT
HOT
72
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
72
75 CHRY NEWY 440 HOT
HOT
72
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
72
75 DODG DART 225 HOT
HOT
72
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
72
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
2
2
2
1
1
1
8
10
9
2
1
1
4
4
4
3
1
2
2
2
2
0
0
0
2
2
2
2
2
2
HC
.77
.43
.60
.77
.33
.54
.00
.91
.52
.34
.29
.79
.58
.39
.48
.21
.21
.17
.70
.05
.36
.85
.18
.50
.60
.77
.69
.86
.75
.80
JRAMS P
CO
72
65
69
56
32
43
132
184
159
72
37
54
123
125
124
104
42
72
69
72
71
35
8
21
55
73
64
73
84
79
.6
.8
.1
.1
.4
.7
.8
.0
.5
.6
.9
.5
.7
.3
.6
.6
.2
.0
.6
.7
.2
.4
.9
.6
.4
.0
.6
.4
.9
.4
ER MILE
C02
514
553
534
567
635
602
498
520
510
606
728
670
569
596
583
639
731
687
653
708
682
741
834
790
382
372
377
377
398
388
.6
.2
.7
.0
.5
.7
.8
.4
.0
.9
.7
.4
.5
.5
.6
.5
.8
.6
.4
.6
.2
.6
.4
.0
.1
.4
.0
.5
.8
.6
NOXC
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
0
2
0
1
1
0
0
2
1
2
1
1
1
.78
.49
.63
.78
.36
.56
.52
.90
.20
.34
.12
.22
.67
.15
.40
.30
.70
.99
.15
.65
.37
.17
.72
.93
.90
.69
.27
.70
.07
.37
MPG
FUEL
ECON
13.9
13.4
13.6
13.4
12.9
13.1
12.1
10.5
11.2
12.2
11 .2
11 .7
11 .4
11 .0
11 .2
10.9
11.1
11 .0
11 .5
10.7
11.1
11.1
10.5
10.8
18.6
17.9
18.2
17.7
16.4
17.0
K-37
-------
APPENDIX K.CONT'D
LISTING OF 1972 FEDERAL HOT START TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO. YR MAKE MODL CID TEST TYPE
HPR
GRAMS PER MILE PDEL
HC CO C02 NOXC ECON
618
620
621
622
623
75 DODG DART 318 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
75 DODG CHAR 318 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
75 DODG CHAR 360 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
75 DODG CHAR 400 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
75 DODG MONA 400 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
1
1
1
0
0
0
1
2
2
0
0
0
2
2
2
1
0
1
2
2
2
2
1
1
6
6
6
4
1
3
.40
.91
.67
.88
.35
.60
.86
.30
.09
.76
.45
.59
.34
.59
.47
.55
.90
.21
.87
.67
.77
.24
.00
.59
.10
.37
.24
.34
.90
.07
28
60
45
12
15
14
30
63
47
13
14
13
75
83
79
56
33
44
56
63
59
56
48
52
123
170
148
90
67
78
.4
.2
.0
.8
.8
.4
.5
.7
.8
.0
.0
.5
.0
.1
.2
.9
.3
.6
.4
.0
.9
.0
.3
.0
.6
.6
.1
.2
.0
492
540
517
544
609
578
481
500
491
565
608
587
452
512
483
510
626
570
533
587
561
616
692
656
501
568
536
560
667
.3
.3
.3
.5
.1
.2
.9
.3
.5
.1
.6
.7
.5
.4
.7
.0
.8
.9
.0
.3
.3
.3
.5
.1
.3
.6
.4
.4
.9
.4
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
1
2
1
0
1
2
1
1
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
c
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
.79
.37
.57
.74
.43
.58
.58
.32
,88
.69-
.82
.24
.10
.13
.60
.88
.25
.55
.41
.77
A
.08
.68
.33
.50
.09
ft C
.75
/\ A
.92
.16
£?
.03
.88
16.
13.
15,
15,
11.
11.
16,
11.
15.
15.
11.
11.
15.
13.
11.
11.
13,
13.
11.
12.
13,
12.
4 1
1 ll
4 «.
11.
12.
10
1 v i
11.
1 1 1
12.
11,
11,
ll
8
0
6
0
7
6
6
5
1
0
5
ll
6
1
7
0
1
5
c.
)
q
7
n
\
\
9
K-38
-------
APPENDIX K.CONT'D
TTNG OF 1972 FEDERAL HOT START TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO,
621
649
653
654
655
YR MAKE MODL CID TEST TYPE
75 FORD PINT 140 HOT
HOT
72
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
72
75 FORD GRAN 302 HOT
HOT
72
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
72
75 FORD STAW 351 HOT
HOT
72
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
72
75 FORD ELIT 400 HOT
HOT
72
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
72
75 FORD LTD 460 HOT
HOT
72
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
72
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
r
HC
1 .
1 .
1 .
1 .
1.
1 .
5.
3.
4.
4.
3.
3.
1 .
1.
1 .
1 .
1 .
1 .
2.
3.
2.
1 .
0.
0.
1 .
1.
1.
1.
0.
1 .
84
38
60
78
13
44
10
80
42
49
01
72
22
25
23
12
00
06
37
12
76
25
66
94
37
56
47
82
77
27
JRAMS P
CO
27
21
24
25
25
25
99
102
101
124
87
105
42
48
45
36
31
33
11
7
9
30
20
24
26
61
44
19
11
14
.0
.9
.4
.4
.8
.6
.4
.5
.0
.6
.7
.4
.0
.3
.3
.3
.5
.8
.5
.5
.4
.0
.2
.9
.9
.4
.9
.0
.0
.8
ER MILE
C02
353
384
369
371
406
389
461
506
485
505
589
549
589
625
608
647
719
685
566
583
575
685
792
741
737
804
772
739
803
772
.4
.7
.7
.0
.1
.3
.5
.9
.2
.9
.6
.5
.0
.9
.2
.5
.5
.0
.4
.1
.1
.2
.7
.2
.6
.8
.6
.4
.1
.6
NOXC
2
1
1
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
1
2
2
0
1
2
1
2
1
1
1
2
0
1
1
1
1
.23
.26
.72
.71
.93
.31
.53
.43
.48
.51
.34
.42
.75
.53
.59
.01
.96
.46
.73
.75
.22
.71
.37
.53
.00
.99
.47
.98
.43
.69
MPG
FUEL
ECON
22. 1
21 .0
21.5
21.3
19.7
20.4
14.0
13.1
13.5
12.4
12.0
12.2
13.5
12.6
13.0
12.5
11 .5
12.0
15.0
14.7
14.8
12.1
10.7
11.3
11.3
9.8
10.5
11.5
10.8
11.1
K-39
-------
APPENDIX K.CONT'D
LISTING OF 1972 FEDERAL HOT START TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
MPG
VfcH
NO.
656
•
664
665
667
672
YR MAKE MODL CID TEST TYPE
75 FORD GRAN 351 HOT
HOT
72
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
72
75 FORD THND 460 HOT
HOT
72
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
72
76 LING CONT 460 HOT
HOT
72
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
72
75 MERC MONA 200 HOT
HOT
72
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
72
75 MERC MONO 351 HOT
HOT
72
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOJT
72
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
HC
4
2
3
3
2
2
3
3
3
1
0
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
2
0
1
2
0
1
1
2
1
2
1
1
.73
.93
.79
.37
.26
.79
.04
.28
.17
.54
.68
.09
.14
.96
.04
.31
.53
.91
.78
.95
.83
.08
.90
.47
.76
.11
.95
.01
.20
.59
rnnrio rnn raj.LCi----_
CO C02 NOXC
69
105
88
21
17
19
95
128
112
28
29
28
4
3.2
19
4
3
3
15
18
17
16
18
17
43
62
53
40
17
28
.9
.3
.3
.3
.7
.4
.1
.6
.6
.3
.2
.8
.8
.4
.2
.5
.0
.7
.5
.6
.1
.5
.3
.4
.1
.4
.1
.1
.9
.5
536
567
552
603
654
630
641
684
663
791
862
828
707
708
707
778
841
811
417
455
437
417
457
438
603
660
633
629
705
669
.4
.5
.6
.7
.6
.2
.2
.7
.9
.6
.5
.6
.0
.6
.8
.2
.1
.0
.3
.1
.0
.0
.9
.3
.1
.9
.2
.8
.2
.1
2
1
2
2
1
2
1
0
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
1
1
.96
.27
.08
.73
.64
.16
.91
.84
.35
.15
.07
.59
.37
.01
.18
.00
.92
.96
.60
.44
.51
.57
44
. 1
.49
.71
O A
.80
_ ii
.24
.83
A a
.18
HO
.I?
FUEL
ECOH
13,1
12,0
k. | V
12,6
13,7
12.9
13.3
11.1
9.9
10,1
10,6
9.7
10,1
12,1
11,6
12.0
11,2
10,5
10,8
19,7
ft 4
18,2
.ft fl
18.9
19,7
18 1
1 0. '
ifl 0
10.7
13,1
11 6
1 1 •
12 3
\ilJ
12,7
12,"
i •* •
12,3
K-40
-------
APPENDIX K.CONT'D
TING OF 1972 FEDERAL HOT START TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO,
675
689
690
691
691
YR MAKE MODL CID TEST TYPE
75 OLDS OMEG 260 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
75 PLYM DUST 225 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
75 PLYM VALI 225 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
75 PLYM DUST 225 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
75 PLYM FURY 360 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
1
1
1
0
0
0
3
3
3
2
2
2
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
4
5
5
1
0
1
HC
.14
.41
.28
.99
.46
.71
.95
.77
.85
.59
.48
.53
.48
.39
.43
.38
.27
.32
.44
.57
.51
.03
.33
.67
.60
.45
.04
.67
:97
.30
JRAMS P
CO
27
35
31
25
18
22
82
71
76
34
32
33
85
112
99
65
69
67
48
71
60
50
40
45
98
126
113
60
25
42
.9
.3
.8
.8
.8
.2
.6
.7
.9
.6
.4
.4
.4
.5
.5
.6
.2
.5
.4
.1
.2
.4
.7
.3
.5
.8
.3
.6
.9
.5
ER MILE
C02
471
488
480
555
625
591
434
438
436
387
442
416
399
389
394
419
435
427
403
389
396
408
431
420
497
536
517
578
653
617
.5
.6
.4
.0
.4
.7
.6
.8
.8
.9
.4
.3
.8
.6
.5
.5
.7
.9
.7
.6
.3
.3
.5
.4
.2
.3
.6
.5
.1
.3
NOXC
2
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
.42
.06
.71
.55
.57
.04
.47
.33
.88
.70
.44'
.56
.47
.05
.25
.19
.11
.15
.82
.79
.80
.67
.50
.58
.95
.14
.53
.40
.11
.25
MPG
FUEL
ECON
17
16
16
14
13
14
15
15
15
19
17
18
16
15
15
16
16
16
18
17
17
18
17
17
13
1 1
12
13
12
12
.1
.2
.6
.8
.5
.1
.4
.8
.6
.7
.7
.6
.3
.4
.8
.7
.1
.4
.2
.4
.8
.0
.8
.9
.3
.8
.5
.1
.7
.9
K-A1
-------
APPENDIX K.CONT'D
LISTING OF 1972 FEDERAL HOT START TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO.
696
698
699
700
701
YR MAKE MODL CID TEST TYPE
75 PONT FIRE 250 HOT
HOT
72
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
72
75 PONT FIRE 350 HOT
HOT
72
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
72
75 PONT LEMA 350 HOT
HOT
72
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
72
75 PONT CATA 400 HOT
HOT
72
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
72
76 PONT FIRE 400 HOT
HOT
72
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
72
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
GRAMS P
HC CO
2
2
2
0
0
0
7
7
7
4
3
3
2
2
2
1
0
0
4
5
4
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
.09
.40
.25
.95
.17
.54
.76
.20
.47
.28
.01
.62
.02
.79
.42
.10
.56
.82
.40
.10
.76
.37
.49
.43
.43
.47
.45
.01
.08
.04
46
70
58
21
1
11
198
160
178
140
77
107
61
93
78
28
18
23
123
134
129
119
98
108
72
90
82
73
101
88
.1
.7
.9
.4
.5
.0
.8
.6
.9
.4
.7
.7
.8
.9
.5
.7
.0
.1
.1
.6
.1
.8
.9
.9
.9
.5
.1
.8
.5
.3
ER MILE
C02 NOXC
386
389
387
416
415
416
399
455
428
435
508
473
493
533
514
528
590
561
486
504
495
566
658
614
483
525
505
529
560
545
.2
.5
.9
.5
.9
.2
.5
.3
.6
.1
.0
.1
.8
.7
.6
.6
.8
.0
.2
.8
.9
.9
.4
.6
.9
.9
.8
.2
.6
.6
1
1
1
1
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
1
2
3
2
2
1
1
1
0
C
0
2
1
2
1
0
.67
.55
.61
.68
.02
.86
.46
.34
.40
.75
.97'
.86
.40
.96
.65
.00
.06
.51
.74
.10
.40
.60
It A
.49
_ ii
.54
.39
n c
.75
f\ £
.05
.06
cfl
.50
fl1
.01
MPG
FUEL
ECOH
19,1
17,5
18,2
19,6
21,2
20,1
12,1
12,1
12.1
13.3
13.9
13.6
11,9
12,9
13.1
15.1
11,3
11,8
12,8
. _ j
12,1
0 ll
12,1
11,6
in 8
1 V lv
11 1
1111
11,6
13,1
i j'
11 1
i j'1
13-6
12,2
'A
12.8
K-42
-------
APPENDIX K.CONT'D
TSTING OF 1972 FEDERAL HOT START TEST PROCEDURE
nu TMIUVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINT
ON INDIVIDUAL
RESULTS
NTENANCE
DENVER
MPG
VEH
NO,
705
709
713
71H
715
YR MAKE MODL CID TEST TYPE
75 DATS B210 85 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
75 OPEL STAW 116 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
75 TOYO CORO 134 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
75 VOLK SEDA 97 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
75 VOLK SEDA 97 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
2
1
1
2
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
1
1
1
2
3
3
2
2
2
HC
.25
.37
.79
.05
.83
.93
.62
.50
.56
.31
.41
.36
.78
.47
.62
.70
.20
.44
.05
.48
.28
.40
.88
.65
.81
.58
.21
.39
.22
.30
n « n o r
CO
31
27
29
30
27
29
70
78
74
49
52
51
28
28
28
30
27
28
21
29
25
1 1
9
10
63
79
71
49
22
35
.8
.6
.6
.6
.5
.0
.1
.3
.3
.9
. 1
.0
.4
.7
.5
.2
.6
.9
.6
.1
.5
.8
.7
.7
.1
.8
.8
.6
.0
.2
c. n n j. LI c,
C02
259
305
283
264
311
288
323
379
352
342
399
372
347
409
379
373
443
409
260
299
281
339
415
379
222
239
231
261
318
291
.7
.8
.7
.1
.4
.8
.3
.0
.3
.8
.1
.1
.5
.5
.8
.7
.0
.8
.5
.8
.0
.2
.7
.1
.3
.0
.0
.4
.7
.3
NOXC
2
0
1
2
1
2
0
0
0
1
0
0
3
1
2
3
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
.03
.83
.41
.62
.50
.04
.80
.67
.73
.07
.78
.92
.64
.47
.51
.65
.39
.47
.27
.46
.85
.64
.08
.35
.82
.54
.67
.90
.04
.97
r u ck
ECON
28
25
26
27
24
26
20
17
18
20
18
19
22
19
20
20
18
19
29
25
27
24
20
22
26
23
25
25
24
25
.0
.1
.4
.9
.6
.1
.1
.4
.6
.7
.2
.3
.3
.3
.7
.8
.1
.3
.5
.1
.0
.5
.3
.1
.9
.6
.1
.6
.6
.1
K-43
-------
APPENDIX K.CONT'D
LISTING OF 1972 FEDERAL HOT START TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
HPG
vnn
NO.
716
717
046
047
048
YR MAKE MODL CID TEST TYPE
75 VOLK SEDA 97 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
75 VOLK TRAN 109 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
74 AMMO HORN 304 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
74 BUIC RIVI 455 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
74 BUIC CENT 350 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
]
2
3
2
2
2
2
4
5
4
2
2
2
5
4
4
5
4
4
4
3
4
4
4
4
4
3
3
8
5
6
KG
.54
.20
.88
.02
.17
.10
.16
.18
.69
.92
.41
.66
.15
.69
.91
.10
.36
.71
.45
.60
.00
.95
.18
.55
.55
.02
.75
.51
.25
.81
n n ri i
Cl
60
79
70
48
42
44
72
82
77
48
43
46
59
55
57
53
46
49
32
18
25
49
27
38
65
61
63
180
96
1^6
j r
D
.6
.6
.5
.2
.0
.9
.7
.1
.6
.5
.8
.0
.8
.6
.6
.6
.2
.8
.5
.4
.1
.9
.6
.3
.7
.4
.4
.6
.1
.6
on n
CO
235
271
254
287
352
321
309
351
331
405
472
440
443
471
457
478
534
507
660
723
693
655
706
682
490
526
508
619
670
646
1LC,
2
.8
.7
.5
.0
.3
.0
.2
.1
.0
.3
.1
.1
.2
.1
.7
.2
.3
.5
.9
.9
.8
.5
.3
.0
.1
.0
.8
.6
.6
.2
N
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
3
2
2
4
2
3
5
2
14
4
3
3
3
1
2
0
0
oxc
.79
.58
.68
.67
.61
.64
.95
.75
.84
.03
.94
.98
.65
.02
.80
.36
.15
.21
.48
.97
.17
.79
1 0
A II
.94
.60
C" 1
.52
f i
.52
.71
of.
.0°
7Q
. i"
PU
EC
26
21
23
21
20
22
20
1?
19
18
16
17
16
15
15
15
A \\
11
11
12
1 1
11
11
11
1 1
11
1 1
11
ill
1 ^
9
10
10
EL
ON
,2
,8
,7
,0
,9
,3
.3
,9
,0
,1
,2
,0
,0
.5
,T
,3
A
,3
.
,2
(.
.1
'
,8
'i
t '
g
!o
,3
,5
,1
K-44
-------
APPENDIX K.CONT'D
ITSTING OF 1972 FEDERAL HOT START TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
MPG
VEH
NO,
019
050
051
052
053
YR MAKE MODL CID TEST TYPE
74 CHEV VEGA 140 HOT
HOT
72
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
72
74 CHEV MONT 350 HOT
HOT
72
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
72
74 CHEV NOVA 250 HOT
HOT
72
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
72
74 CHEV CAMA 350 HOT
HOT
72
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
72
™ CHEV CHEL 350 HOT
HOT
72
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
72
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
2
2
2
2
2
2
5
3
4
4
4
4
3
2
2
3
2
2
3
3
3
3
2
3
3
2
3
3
1
2
HC
.53
.69
.61
.57
.66
.62
.54
.49
.47
.88
.06
.46
.41
.29
.83
.20
. 12
.64
.77
.05
.39
.32
.72
.01
.82
.26
.01
.33
.89
.58
i n H ri o i
CO
57
64
60
53
68
61
108
81
94
66
30
47
57
43
50
46
34
40
74
83
78
66
56
61
87
74
80
77
39
57
.1
.0
.7
.5
.2
.2
.2
.8
.5
.3
.4
.6
.5
.4
.2
.4
.9
.4
.0
.5
.9
.5
.3
.2
.0
.1
.3
.3
.3
.5
Ei I\ 1'lJ.LtCi
C02
320
300
310
300
293
296
502
606
556
501
582
543
383
489
438
387
451
421
526
585
557
527
592
561
521
592
558
566
663
616
.2
.7
.0
.5
.2
.7
.1
.9
.8
.8
.3
.8
.4
.5
.7
.5
.6
.0
.2
.4
.1
.9
.7
.7
.0
.9
.5
.2
.2
.8
NOXC
2
1
2
1
1
1
0
0
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.51
.84
.16
.99
.38
.67
.87
.63
.75
.37
.01
.18
.87
.30
.58
.06
.03
.52
.38
.73
.04
.19
.77
.97
.85
.58
.71
.91
.77
.84
r u E,L>
ECON
21 .2
21.7
21.5
22.6
21.7
22. 1
12.9
11.9
12.3
14.3
13.8
14.0
18.3
15.7
16.9
18.9
17.3
18.0
13.6
12.2
12.8
13.8
12.9
13.3
13.2
12.4
12.8
12.7
12.1
12.4
K-45
-------
APPENDIX K.CONT'D
LISTING OF 1972 FEDERAL HOT START TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO. YR MAKE MODL CID TEST TYPE
MPG
GRAMS PER MILE pUEL
HC CO C02 NOXC ECQH
054
•
055
056
057
058
74 CHEV CAPR 400 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
74 DODG CHAR 318 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
74 DODG DART 225 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
74 FORD PINT 122 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
74 FORD MAVE 302 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
T o c>«nn
5
5
5
4
4
4
9
9
9
4
4
4
4
3
4
3
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
4
4
4
4
4
>i
.24
.52
.39
.31
.48
.40
.33
.95
.65
.56
.19
.37
.44
.63
.02
.79
.87
.31
.97
.56
.75
.73
.40
.56
.91
.49
.69
.72
.18
H ii
140
174
158
88
95
92
172
141
156
71
68
69
82
76
79
82
65
73
47
50
48
40
44
42
110
123
117
78
74
*r £
.6
.5
.3
.3
.4
.0
.2
.7
.3
.4
.4
.8
.8
.5
.5
.6
.2
.5
.1
.1
.6
.3
.4
.4
.4
.8
.4
.7
.7
&
634
696
667
654
733
695
390
413
402
466
518
493
354
369
362
395
442
420
281
310
296
263
296
280
438
482
461
435
469
HR3
.4
.9
.0
.0
.3
.3
.0
.9
.5
.8
.5
.7
.9
.0
.3
.5
.7
.1
.6
.1
.5
.7
.0
.5
.9
.7
.8
.6
.5
.3
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
2
1
1
1
0
0
2
1
1
.52
.04
.27
.67
.14
.39
.75
.52
.63
,70
.06
.36
.61
.03
.31
.33
.00
.16
.33
.51
.90
.46
_ I*
.5*
- Q
.98
.23
t r
.65
rt *5
.93
.02
n 1
.01
.19
10
9
9
11
9
10
12
13
13
15
13
11
If
17
17
16
16
16
21
fL ft
22
1*3
23
26
33
i)
?il
t^
11
12
1 *-
13
i J
15
11
15
,2
,0
,5
,0
,9
,1
,9
,3
,1
,0
,9
,*
,8
.?
,8
,5
,0
,3
J
i
,i
\
.1
,2
d
itf
,8
i w
,1
,8
J
,5
,8
,1
K-46
-------
APPENDIX K.CONT'D
iTSTlNG OF 1972 FEDERAL HOT START TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO.
059
060
061
062
063
YR MAKE MODL CID TEST TYPE
74 FORD HAVE 250 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
74 FORD LTD 400 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
74 FORD LTD 400 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
74 LINC CONT 460 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
71 MERC MONT 302 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
4
3
3
3
2
3
5
4
4
5
3
4
4
2
3
3
2
2
7
5
6
5
3
4
5
4
5
5
4
5
HC
.25
.43
.82
.78
.70
.22
.14
.12
.60
.15
.14
.11
.30
.68
.46
.73
.32
.99
.27
.77
.49
.85
.69
.73
.84
.76
.28
.51
.55
.01
JRAMS P
CO
66.
75.
71 .
68.
66.
67.
80.
75.
77.
95.
83.
89.
47.
41.
44.
50.
30.
39.
163.
135.
148.
105.
37.
70.
63.
64.
64.
60.
50.
55.
3
4
1
5
5
4
1
2
5
9
8
6
5
0
1
1
2
7
8
3
9
8
3
1
7
3
0
4
9
4
ER MILE
C02
351
372
362
386
437
412
492
528
511
521
637
582
595
664
631
592
681
639
566
654
612
608
734
674
516
553
535
508
567
539
.9
.2
.5
.2
.4
.9
.7
.4
.3
.7
.8
.2
.2
.0
.1
.8
.4
.0
.2
.7
.4
.8
.6
.4
.5
.3
.7
.5
.8
.5
NOXC
1
0
1
1
0
0
1
1
1
0
1
0
3
2
2
2
1
2
2
1
2
2
2
2
3
2
2
3
2
2
.51
.96
.22
.08
.71
.89
.80
.67
.73
.83
.09
.96
.07
.04
.53
.63
.72
.16
.44
.72
.07
.46
.10
.27
.19
.06
.60
.06
.31
.67
MPG
FUEL
ECON
18
17
18
17
16
16
14
13
13
12
11
12
13
12
12
13
12
12
10
10
10
1 1
11
11
14
13
13
14
13
13
.9
.7
.3
.5
.1
.8
.0
.5
.7
.9
.4
.1
.0
.0
.5
.0
.1
.5
.5
.0
.2
.2
.0
.1
.0
.3
.6
.3
.4
.8
K-47
-------
APPENDIX K.CONT'D
LISTING OF 1972 FEDERAL HOT START TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO.
064
065
066
067
068
YR MAKE MODL CID TEST TYPE
74 OLDS CUTL 350 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
74 OLDS DELT 350 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
74 OLDS 98 455 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
74 PLYM SATE 318 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
74 PLYM DUST 225 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
r.
HC
5
5
5
4
4
4
5
4
4
5
4
4
4
3
3
3
3
3
5
4
5
4
3
3
3
3
3
4
2
3
.43
.04
.23
.91
.75
.83
.45
.51
.96
.73
.11
.88
.07
.63
.84
.25
.17
.20
.97
.72
.31
.13
.83
.97
.67
.06
.35
.61
.27
.-RQ
IRAMS P
CO
81
83
82
81
91
86
119
90
104
98
35
65
48
50
49
36
34
35
38
40
39
39
37
38
51
59
55
48
38
43
.9
.3
.6
.2
.7
.7
.9
.1
.4
.3
.3
.5
.1
.7
.5
.9
.6
.7
.0
.4
.2
.3
.8
.5
.5
.0
.4
.7
.3
.3
ER MILE
C02 NOXC
520
568
545
538
600
570
560
650
607
573
666
622
639
704
673
633
700
668
483
525
505
529
564
547
390
395
393
403
444
.1
.9
.6
.5
.3
.7
.9
.6
.6
.5
.5
.0
.9
.0
.3
.6
.0
.2
.9
.7
.7
.2
.9
.8
.2
.7
.0
.6
.5
.0
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
3
2
4
2
3
4
2
3
3
1
2
2
1
2
3
1
2
2
1
2
.01
.37
.67
.56
.00
,27
.95
.58
,76
.62
.11
,89
,25
.39
.28"
.84
.58
.66
.11
.89
.62
.65
ft 0
.88
f\ C
.25
.30
A 1
.92
i- 0
,58
.50
84
1
MPG
FUEL
ECON
13
12
12
13
11
12
11
11
11
11
12
12
12
11
11
12
11
12
15
4 ll
11
4 r
15
in
a
i ^
18
17
[ 1
18
1 u
17
17
i t
17
,3
J
,8
,0
.7
,3
,6
.0
.3
,9
,1
,0
,2
,2
,6
,6
/
,6
,1
.8
'*
1
,1
9
i 7
3
i J
i«
,1
i
J
,3
K-48
-------
APPENDIX K.CONT'D
ITSTING OF 1972 FEDERAL HOT START TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO,
069
070
071
072
073
YR MAKE MODL CID TEST TYPE
74 PONT BONN MOO HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
74 PONT LEMA 350 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
74 DATS 610 119 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
74 MAZD RX3 70 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
™ TOYO CELI 97 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
4
4
4
4
4
4
5
5
5
5
4
4
3
4
4
5
4
4
8
8
8
7
7
7
3
3
3
3
3
3
HC
.55
.65
.60
.56
.79
.68
.62
.38
.49
.26
.28
.75
.97
.52
.26
.01
.78
.89
.96
.08
.50
.57
.94
.76
.13
.48
.31
.39
.46
.43
JRAMS P
CO
45
71
58
23
22
22
77
100
89
46
44
45
63
43
53
64
48
56
83
80
81
66
71
69
28
57
43
21
39
30
.3
.0
.7
.0
.0
.5
.5
.7
.6
.2
.0
.0
.6
.4
.1
.1
.5
.0
.8
.0
.8
.6
.8
.3
.2
.7
.6
.8
.3
.9
ER MILE
C02
577
633
606
597
670
635
546
605
577
570
656
615
285
329
308
288
333
312
402
467
436
443
490
468
333
335
334
338
352
345
.7
.4
.8
.9
.8
.9
.4
.2
.0
.1
.5
.1
.2
.1
.1
.3
.9
.1
.3
.6
.4
.6
.5
.1
.5
.7
.7
.2
.2
.5
NOXC
2
1
2
2
1
2
2
1
2
3
2
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
1
1
2
1
1
.89
.41
.12
.95
.76
.33
.89
.69
.26
.84
.25
.01
.86
.67
.76
.94
.78
.86
.80
.36
.57
.72
.35
.52
.26
.34
.78
.25
.40
.81
MPG
FUEL
ECON
13
1 1
12
13
12
12
12
11
12
13
12
12
22
21
21
21
20
21
15
14
15
15
14
14
22
20
21
23
20
21
.4
.7
.4
.7
.3
.9
.9
.4
.1
.5
.0
.7
.3
.6
.9
.9
.9
.4
.8
.3
.0
.5
.1
.8
.9
.3
.5
.2
.9
.9
K-49
-------
APPENDIX K.CONT'D
LISTING OF 1972 FEDERAL HOT START TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO.
074
•
075
352
354
721
YR MAKE MODL CID TEST TYPE
74 VOLK SEDA 97 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
74 VOLK SEDA 97 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
74 CHRY NEWP 400 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
74 FORD ELIT 351 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
74 AMMO GREM 232 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
GRAMS P
HC CO
4
6
5
4
4
4
3
4
3
3
4
4
6
5
6
3
3
3
7
5
6
7
4
6
5
6
6
4
4
U
.16
.28
.27
.07
.17
.12
.66
.10
.89
.60
.40
.02
.27
.99
.12
.72
.01
.35
.84
.91
.83
.84
.88
.30
.99
.59
.30
.65
.84
.75
59
70
65
50
49
49
56
60
58
38
33
35
109
125
117
67
49
57
103
116
109
64
46
54
58
86
73
53
64
•59
.6
.5
.3
.3
.5
.9
.6
.4
.6
.1
.6
.8
.1
.3
.5
.2
.4
.9
.2
.1
.9
.1
.4
.9
.6
.7
.3
.5
.7
.3
ER MILE
C02 NOXC
226
249
238
236
258
247
227
243
236
235
268
252
583
628
607
610
707
660
486
542
515
488
551
521
363
405
385
358
420
.7
.8
.7
.5
.2
.8
.9
.9
.2
.1
.0
.3
.5
.8
.1
.3
.1
.7
.9
.0
.6
.7
.4
.4
.1
.3
.1
.5
.2
.7
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
0
1
2
1
1
2
1
2
2
1
2
1
1
1
2
1
2
1
1
1
2
1
1
.99
.09
.52
.12
.11
.60
.54
.98
.25
.09
.43
.75
.52
.98
.24
.37
.85
.10
.73
.32
.51
.53
.79
.15
.96
f\ O
.03
Ii IT
.47
,22
!?3
HPG
FUEL
ECON
26
23
21
27
25
26
27
25
26
29
26
27
11
10
10
12
11
11
13
14
1
4 A
12
H
1 0
1J
ill
It
18
15
J /
17
1 1
19
16
17
.6
,3
• -j
,8
,0
,1
,2
,0
,2
,1
,0
,5
,6
,5
.5
,9
,2
,2
16
,2
.
,H
Q
i 7
1
i '
,1
,8
1
t
',<>
,8
K-50
-------
APPENDIX K.CONT'D
ITSTING OF 1972 FEDERAL HOT START TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTl
:NTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO,
721
728
731
732
Nl
YR MAKE MODL CID TEST TYPE
74 BUIC APOL 350 HOT
HOT
72
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
72
74 CHEV VEGA 140 HOT
HOT
72
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
72
74 CHEV NOVA 350 HOT
HOT
72
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
72
74 CHEV NOVA 350 HOT
HOT
72
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
72
™ FORD PINT 122 HOT
HOT
72
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
72
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
6
6
6
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
3
5
4
5
4
4
4
11
18
15
13
12
12
3
4
4
4
4
4
---(
HC
.36
.82
.60
.77
.08
.41
.99
.75
.86
.39
.73
.05
.90
.43
.13
.92
.29
.59
.01
.72
.03
.62
.37
.97
.88
.58
.25
.10
.31
.21
}RAMS P
CO
104
159
133
38
26
31
87
95
91
54
43
48
71
69
70
69
62
65
84
171
129
137
188
163
46
46
46
50
44
47
.5
.7
.3
.1
.0
.8
.6
.6
.7
.4
.9
.9
.7
.2
.4
.8
.3
.9
.8
.3
.9
.7
.0
.9
.0
.3
.1
.2
.6
.3
ER MILE
C02
480
494
488
581
650
617
289
285
287
319
333
326
463
501
483
496
564
531
506
469
487
615
551
581
258
283
271
293
316
305
.7
.8
.1
.8
.0
.4
.2
.0
.0
.9
.1
.7
.5
.7
.5
.9
.1
.9
.9
.4
.3
.3
.1
.8
.2
.9
.6
.7
.2
.4
NOXC
1
0
1
2
1
1
0
0
0
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
1
2
0
1
1
1
1
1
0
1
.74
.70
.20
.00
.36
.66
.91
.48
.69
.41
.04
.22
.03
.48
.74
.96
.55
.74
.43
.59
.47
.28
.51
.36
.88
.17
.51
.25
.87
.05
MPG
FUEL
ECON
13.3
11 .6
12.4
13.6
12.7
13.1
20.2
19.9
20.0
21.3
21.6
21.5
14.9
14.2
14.5
14.3
13.1
13.7
13.1
11.1
12.0
10. 1
10.0
10.1
25.9
23.9
24.8
23.0
22.2
22.6
K-51
-------
APPENDIX K.CONT'D
LISTING OF 1972 FEDERAL HOT START TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO.
743
744
748
753
757
YR MAKE MODL CID TEST TYPE
74 FORD PINT 140 HOT
HOT
72
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
72
74 FORD PINT 140 HOT
HOT
72
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
72
74 FORD MAVE 302 HOT
HOT
72
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
72
74 FORD STAW 400 HOT
HOT
72
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
72
74 OLDS CUTL 350 HOT
HOT
72
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
GRAMS P
HC CO
6
6
6
5
5
5
4
5
5
3
3
3
7
5
6
3
2
3
5
5
5
5
3
4
4
4
4
.08
.67
.39
.55
.71
.63
.67
.57
.14
.73
.51
.62
.08
.13
.06
.88
.96
.40
.52
.63
.58
.44
.99
.68
.61
.85
.74
102
124
114
94
96
95
85
106
96
76
82
79
23
42
33
16
25
21
105
105
105
85
58
71
56
84
71
.3
.9
.1
.4
.0
.3
.2
.6
.3
.9
.5
.8
.0
.5
.1
.6
.9
.4
.6
.8
.7
.2
.7
.4
.0
.9
.1
ER MILE
C02 NOXC
253
267
260
270
303
287
259
270
265
335
386
361
426
456
442
442
493
469
637
713
677
644
754
701
546
587
567
.3
.4
.7
.8
.5
.8
.3
.3
.0
.5
.1
.9
.2
.9
.2
.6
.9
.4
.4
.5
.0
.3
.0
.5
.0
.4
.6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
2
3
3
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
2
.48
.28
.37
.56
.33
.44
.84
.50
.66
.80
.53
.66
.70
.25
.90
.78
.89
.79
.54
.23
ft
.38
.63
it *>
.43
r~ i
.52
.68
HE
,45
n ll
,04
HPG
FUEL
ECON
20,5
18,3
• j
19,3
20,3
18,8
19,5
21.8
19.5
20,5
19.0
16,8
17.8
18.3
16,1
17.3
18.5
16,3
17.3
10.8
9/1
,9
4fl 5
1U.J
11.2
10 3
I v i J
10 f
1 V I •
13-7
12.1
i *• •
12,8
1 1 '
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
4.01 55.4
3.46 36.3
3.72 45.4
618.3 1.9 ;;;;
712.5 1-J: \\t\
667-4 L71 11-
K-52
-------
APPENDIX K.CONT'D
TING op 1972 FEDERAL HOT START TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO,
758
760
761
762
765
YR MAKE MODL CID TEST TYPE
74 OLDS CUTL 350 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
74 PLYM DUST 225 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
74 PLYM DUST 318 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
74 PLYM FRY3 360 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
71* PONT LEMA 350 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
5
5
5
5
6
5
4
3
4
3
2
3
4
4
4
3
2
3
6
6
6
5
5
5
6
6
6
6
5
6
HC
.36
.26
.30
.33
.44
.91
.23
.78
.00
.85
.62
.21
.68
.15
.40
.92
.78
.32
.25
.18
.21
.29
.52
.41
.64
.33
.48
.80
.48
.11
JRAMS P
CO
55
32
43
63
25
44
73
71
72
52
35
44
41
79
61
53
52
52
103
121
112
67
71
69
89
112
101
45
34
39
.8
.0
.4
.9
.7
.0
.5
.5
.4
.8
.9
.0
.4
.4
.2
.0
.4
.7
.5
.5
.9
.1
.2
.2
.5
.5
.5
.3
.9
.9
ER MILE
C02
540
616
579
567
631
600
369
373
371
379
403
391
471
492
482
496
550
524
539
563
551
565
627
598
517
567
543
553
633
595
.0
.5
.9
.6
.6
.9
.0
.3
.2
.1
.6
.8
.8
.3
.5
.3
.4
.5
.0
.3
.6
.6
.9
.1
.8
.7
.8
.3
.5
.1
NOXC
1
1
1
1
1
1
3
2
2
2
2
2
6
3
5
2
1
1
2
1
2
2
1
2
3
1
2
3
2
3
.56
.33
.44
.40
.22
.30
.16
.19
.66
.74
.16
.44
.47
.84
.10
.05
.12
.57
.91
.75
.31
.86
.94
.38
.14
.68
.38
.97
.29
.09
MPG
FUEL
ECON
13
13
13
13
12
12
17
17
17
18
19
18
16
14
15
15
13
14
12
1 1
1 1
12
1 1
12
13
11
12
13
12
13
.8
.0
.3
.0
.8
.9
.8
.8
.8
.7
.0
.8
.1
.1
.0
.0
.8
.4
.3
.5
.9
.9
.7
.3
.1
.6
.3
.7
.6
.1
K-53
-------
APPENDIX K.CONT'D
LISTING OF 1972 FEDERAL HOT START TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO.
770
YR MAKE MODL CID TEST TYPE
74 COLT SEDA 98 HOT
HOT
TRANS
STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
TRANS
STAB
72 FTP
774
74 FIAT 128 79 HOT
HOT
TRANS
STAB
72 FTP
776
777
780
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
72
74 TOYO CORO 120 HOT
HOT
72
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
72
74 TOYO CORO 97 HOT
HOT
72
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
72
74 VOLV 142 121 HOT
HOT
72
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT
T>
STAB
PTP
n
HC
2
3
3
2
3
3
4
3
4
6
9
8
3
3
3
2
3
2
3
5
4
2
3
3
3
2
3
2
3
9
.77
.42
.11
.88
.11
.00
.82
.99
.39
.47
.71
.16
.93
.17
.53
.71
.03
.87
.87
.63
.79
.98
.51
.25
.08
.95
.01
.76
.07
Q9
RAMS P
CO
47
58
53
47
57
52
80
77
78
62
98
81
28
46
38
29
51
40
55
89
73
39
56
48
61
67
64
36
31
3^
.6
.1
.1
.5
.0
.5
.9
.0
.8
.5
.6
.3
.8
.7
.1
.5
.2
.8
.1
.7
.1
.2
.1
.0
.2
.0
.2
.6
.3
Q
ER MILE
C02 NOXC
246
264
256
248
278
264
256
300
279
394
510
455
314
338
326
329
345
337
260
276
268
256
273
265
299
334
317
287
336
.4
.8
.0
.5
.7
.2
.0
.6
.2
.5
.8
.2
.7
.1
.9
.1
.9
.9
.0
.8
.8
.3
.0
.0
.2
.4
.5
.0
.2
.6
2
1
2
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
3
2
2
2
1
2
2
0
1
2
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
.86
.98
.40
.43
.90
.15
.03
.53
.77
.92
.66
.78
.54
!o3
.75
.59
.50
.03
.11
.78
.42
.60
<ȣ
.36
nf
.90
.78
nto
.08
•
.16
>
MPG
FUEL
ECOH
26,9
21,2
25,1
26,7
23,5
21,9
22,3
20,1
21,3
17.3
12,7
14,6
23.8
21,1
22,3
23,1
_ b
20. *
. . f
21,*
24.1
A A h
20,'!
OO 3
22J
27,1
23,8
25J
£/ tj
21-9
19.8
i / •
20,7
25-1
22.5
23-7
K-54
-------
APPENDIX K.CONT'D
iTSTING OF 1972 FEDERAL HOT START TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO,
101
102
103
104
105
YR MAKE MODL CID TEST TYPE
73 AMMO HORN 232 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
73 BUIC ELEC 455 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
73 CADI DEVI 472 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
73 CHEV VEGA 140 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
73 CHEV MALI 350 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
3
3
3
3
2
2
3
4
3
2
2
2
4
2
3
8
2
5
4
5
5
4
5
4
3
3
3
3
2
2
r
HC
.02
.03
.02
.38
.27
.80
.65
.23
.95
.94
.92
.93
.46
.85
.62
.71
.81
.64
.46
.88
.20
.48
.25
.88
.72
.15
.42
.17
.46
.80
}RAMS P
CO
26
44
35
26
30
28
70
77
74
55
62
59
107
78
92
75
48
61
54
87
72
50
79
65
72
58
65
62
49
55
.5
.3
.8
.7
.3
.6
.7
.5
.3
.4
.2
.0
.6
.7
.6
.0
.3
.1
.9
.9
.1
.3
.5
.5
.2
.7
.2
.0
.4
.4
ER MILE
C02
381
374
377
406
438
423
629
703
667
629
718
675
704
757
731
705
783
746
276
332
305
276
337
308
472
521
498
505
569
538
.3
.7
.9
.6
.6
.3
.0
.5
.9
.6
.4
.9
.0
.0
.7
.1
.6
.0
.7
.3
.7
.1
.8
.3
.8
.7
.3
.4
.4
.8
NOXC
7
5
6
2
1
2
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
2
1
0
1
1
0
1
1
1
1
1
0
1
.07
.12
.05
.89
.98
.42
.73
.13
.41
.15
.27
.69
.56
.29
.42
.23
.79
.00
.98
.85
.39
.79
.74
.24
.60
.04
.31
.24
.89
.06
MPG
FUEL
ECON
20
19
20
19
18
18
1 1
10
11
12
10
1 1
10
10
10
10
10
10
23
18
20
24
18
20
14
14
14
14
13
14
.5
.6
.0
.3
.0
.6
.8
.6
.1
.2
.8
.4
.0
.0
.0
.4
.2
.3
.5
.1
.4
.0
.5
.8
.8
.2
.5
.5
.6
.0
K-55
-------
APPENDIX K.CONT'D
LISTING OF 1972 FEDERAL HOT START TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO. YR MAKE MODL CID TEST TYPE
HPG
GRAMS PER MILE FDEL
HC CO C02 NOXC ECO»
106
73 CHEV NOVA 350 HOT
HOT
TRANS
STAB
72 FTP
•
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
TRANS
STAB
72 FTP
107
73 CHEV IMPA 350 HOT
HOT
TRANS
STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
TRANS
STAB
72 FTP
108
73 CHEV IMPA 350 HOT
HOT
TRANS
STAB
72 FTP
109
110
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
72
73 CHEV IMPA 400 HOT
HOT
72
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
72
73 DODG DART 225 HOT
HOT
72
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
72
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
4
2
3
2
2
2
4
4
4
4
2
3
3
2
2
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
4
4
4
3
2
3
.15
.67
.38
.64
.33
.48
.70
.06
.37
.09
.99
.52
.25
.47
.84
.59
.06
.31
.70
.49
.59
.45
.20
.32
.63
.34
.48
.33
.70
.00
95
65
79
58
67
63
56
35
45
54
28
41
79
67
73
59
39
48
62
62
62
58
45
51
103
102
102
65
38
51
.3
.2
.6
.5
.7
.3
.0
.3
.2
.2
.9
.0
.0
.9
.2
.8
.0
.9
.7
.5
.6
.4
.5
.7
.6
.1
.8
.1
.4
.2
458
517
489
511
598
556
470
535
504
536
605
572
555
606
582
527
588
559
598
685
643
601
680
642
301
299
300
343
361
353
.8
.5
.4
.7
.2
.8
.5
.6
.5
.7
.3
.5
.4
.6
.1
.9
.5
.5
.3
.1
.6
.1
.3
.4
.3
.9
.6
.9
.3
.0
1
0
0
1
0
1
3
2
3
2
1
2
1
0
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
3
1
2
4
2
.14
.84
.98
.45
.82
.12
.30
.78
.03
.75
.90
.31
.23
.96
.09
.81
.40
.60
.11
.43
.75
.82
n y\
.32
t* £
.56
.42
r f
.66
.64
60
'
14,3
« j
14,1
14,2
14,5
12,5
13,1
15,5
14,?
15,1
14,0
13,4
13,?
12,9
12,3
12,6
14,0
13,5
13.T
12,6
« < 1
11,2
11 8
11. '
12,?
11 ?
|li'
12 1
it"
18,5
18,?
19,'
20, f*
20,0
K-56
-------
APPENDIX K.CONT'D
iTSTTNG OF 1972 FEDERAL HOT START TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
N0, YR MAKE MODL CID TEST TYPE
111 73 FORD PINT 122 HOT
HOT
72
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
72
112 73 FORD TORI 351 HOT
HOT
72
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
72
113 73 FORD HAVE 302 HOT
HOT
72
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
72
1111 73 FORD CUST 351 HOT
HOT
72
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
72
115 73 FORD LTD 400 HOT
HOT
72
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
72
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
2
2
2
2
2
2
6
4
5
4
3
3
5
4
5
5
3
4
9
8
8
6
5
5
4
4
4
3
2
3
HC
.79
.80
.80
.59
.52
.56
.24
.19
.17
.42
.33
.85
.36
.66
.00
.91
.78
.80
.00
.87
.94
.60
.32
.93
.06
.00
.03
.58
.78
.16
3RAMS P
CO
58
68
63
27
39
33
94
98
96
70
55
62
83
109
97
57
61
59
172
193
183
124
68
95
89
121
106
61
45
52
.2
.9
.8
.1
.3
.4
.3
.4
.5
.1
.8
.6
.8
.3
.1
.2
.5
.4
.1
.0
.0
.5
.7
.4
.8
.0
.0
.1
.1
.8
ER MILE
C02
274
277
276
299
281
290
528
562
546
619
731
677
403
438
421
466
529
499
426
458
443
486
579
534
535
581
559
556
640
599
.5
.8
.2
.2
.7
.1
.6
.6
.3
.9
.3
.9
.1
.2
.4
.9
.2
.4
.5
.2
.0
.1
.1
.6
.5
.1
.3
.0
.2
.9
NOXC
2
1
1
3
2
2
1
0
0
1
1
1
1
0
0
1
0
0
2
1
1
1
2
2
3
1
2
4
2
3
.35
.58
-95
.59
.01
.77
.03
.76
.89
.64
.53
.58
.09
.55
.81
.06
.75
.90
.24
.21
.70
.96
.32
.15
.86
.96
.87
.17
.44
.27
MPG
FUEL
ECON
23
22
23
25
25
25
12
12
12
11
10
1 1
16
14
15
15
13
14
12
11
11
12
12
12
12
11
12
13
12
12
.7
.5
.0
.4
.3
.3
.7
.1
.4
.9
.7
.3
. 1
.2
.0
.4
.9
.6
.2
.2
.7
.6
.6
.6
.9
.3
.0
.4
.3
.8
K-57
-------
APPENDIX K.CONT'D
LISTING OF 1972 FEDERAL HOT START TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO.
116
•
117
118
V
119
120
YR MAKE MODL CID TEST TYPE
73 MERC MONR 400 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
73 OLDS 98 455 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
73 OLDS CUTL 350 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
73 PLYM SATE 318 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
73 PLYM DUST 225 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
n
HC
4
4
4
4
3
4
3
2
2
3
3
3
4
3
4
4
3
4
4
4
4
3
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
.84
.12
.46
.26
.99
.12
.03
.15
.57
.68
.00
.33
.52
.80
.14
.43
.61
.00
.58
.55
.56
.54
.13
.32
.06
.49
.76
.96
.14
.53
RAMS P
CO
75
69
72
58
48
53
53
31
42
42
42
42
77
57
66
56
26
40
102
123
113
56
43
49
43
26
34
43
25
34
.6
.9
.6
.1
.6
.1
.8
.8
.3
.4
.3
.4
.1
.2
.8
.0
.0
.4
.8
.8
.7
.5
.9
.9
.9
.2
.7
.5
.6
.2
ER MILE
C02 NOXC
537
597
568
541
612
578
699
815
759
672
735
705
571
634
604
555
638
598
454
494
475
484
553
520
364
380
372
379
412
396
.7
.2
.7
.8
.3
.5
.7
.2
.9
.2
.7
.3
.4
.2
.1
.9
.3
.9
.9
.3
.4
.9
.2
.5
.7
.0
.7
.0
.1
.2
2
2
2
2
3
2
2
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
2
2
1
1
2
1
2
6
3
4
4
2
3
.04
.38
.21
.76
.06
.91
.05
.69
.87
.19
.44
.80
.54
.24
.39
.33
.82
.07
.36
.30
.81
.96
O 4
.81
j* £
.36
.04
n II
.04
li ft
.*T
.29
n 3
.23
19
,22
HPG
FUEL
ECOH
13
12
12
13
12
13
11
10
10
11
10
11
12
12
12
13
12
13
11
12
4 O
13
15
ill
n
iD
i"
20
?0
fcu
?0
tw
19
19
i /
19
,2
,3
,?
.1
.?
,1
.2
.2
,6
,8
.9
,3
,6
,1
.3
,5
,9
,1
,1
.
3
J
,2
(0
'j
*v
,0
,?
,1
,1
,3
,»
K-58
-------
APPENDIX K.CONT'D
ITSTING OF 1972 FEDERAL HOT START TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO.
121
122
123
124
125
YR MAKE MODL CID TEST TYPE
73 PONT CATA 400 HOT
HOT
72
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
72
73 PONT LEMA 350 HOT
HOT
72
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
72
73 DATS TRUC 97 HOT
HOT
72
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
72
73 OPEL MANT 1 16 HOT
HOT
72
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
72
73 TOYO CORO 97 HOT
HOT
72
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
72
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
4
4
4
5
4
5
4
4
4
4
3
4
7
6
7
7
8
7
4
6
5
3
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
___n
HC
.57
.85
.71
.19
.87
.02
.93
.55
-73
.50
.84
.16
.56
.93
.23
.77
.00
.89
.96
.00
.50
.33
.70
.52
.06
.04
.53
.72
.23
.46
RAMS P
CO.
30
41
36
23
15
19
52
56
54
27
21
24
44
42
43
54
54
54
77
97
88
59
70
65
46
43
44
30
21
25
.9
.1
.2
.6
.6
.4
.0
.6
.4
.3
.5
.3
.2
.0
.0
.6
.7
.6
.9
.9
.3
.8
.4
.3
.5
.0
.6
.9
.3
.9
ER MILE
C02
586
650
619
598
688
645
554
638
597
566
652
611
303
346
326
303
353
329
255
275
265
279
306
293
283
360
323
268
325
298
.7
.2
.8
.3
.9
.5
.2
.0
.9
.8
.0
.2
.9
.9
.3
.8
.7
.8
.4
.1
.7
.4
.4
.5
.0
.1
.2
.8
.3
.2
NOXC
6
2
4
7
3
5
3
1
2
3
2
2
1
0
1
1
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
1
1
0
1
2
1
1
.82
.92
.79
.10
.26
.10
.54
.90
.69
.84
.20
.99
.51
.97
.23
.03
.83
.93
.25
.73
.98
.42
.71
.05
.38
.73
.04
.14
.20
.65
MPG
FUEL
ECON
13.7
12.2
12.8
13.6
12.2
12.8
13.6
12.0
12.7
14.2
12.7
13.4
»«3
20^4
21.3
21 .4
19.1
20. 1
22.6
19.8
21 .0
23.1
20.7
21 .8
24.3
20.4
22.1
27.2
24.3
25.6
K-59
-------
APPENDIX K.CONT'D
LISTING OF 1972 FEDERAL HOT START TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO. YR MAKE MODL CID TEST TYPE
HPG
GRAMS PER MILE FugL
HC CO C02 NOXC ECON
126
•
127
375
377
380
73 VOLK KOMB 103 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
73 VOLK SEDA 97 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
73 DODG CHAR 318 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
73 FORD PINT 122 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
73 FORD THND 460 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
2
1
2
2
1
1
3
3
3
3
3
3
4
3
4
3
3
3
5
4
5
4
4
4
7
8
8
6
4
5
.38
.70
.03
.30
.43
.84
.43
.97
.71
.91
.87
.89
.18
.97
.07
.92
.00
.44
.31
.87
.08
.17
.00
.08
.75
.30
.04
.04
.60
.29
44
43
44
35
23
29
54
66
60
47
55
51
78
91
85
66
65
65
79
90
85
49
51
50
156
181
169
101
65
82
.7
.6
.2
.6
.3
.2
.6
.2
.7
.1
.0
.2
.2
.2
.0
.6
.3
.9
.8
.4
.3
.7
.6
.7
.0
.5
.3
.1
.2
.4
371
475
426
364
461
414
248
278
264
238
269
254
443
462
453
485
533
510
304
340
323
270
304
288
553
544
548
638
751
697
.9
.6
.0
.3
.2
.8
.1
.9
.1
.1
.0
.2
.5
.0
.2
.7
.7
.7
.6
.4
.3
.9
.8
.6
.1
.2
.5
.8
.9
.7
2
1
2
2
1
1
2
1
1
2
1
1
2
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
2
1
0
0
1
1
.45
.62
.02
.09
.37
.72
.13
.22
.66
.25
.26
.73
.39
.31
.83
.01
.20
.60
.38
.09
.23
.51
.53
.02
.16
r- Q
.58
at.
.86
.51
'07
• *- '
19
16
17
20
17
19
25
22
23
27
21
25
15
11
11
11
13
11
19
17
4 Q
\o
21
00
it-
01
2j
10
10
1 v
10
1 v
10
10
10
,1
,1
,8
.1
.0
,1
,1
.9
,3
,1
.6
,3
,1
,8
,7
,1
,2
,9
.
l?
,5
'«
'
.8
!t
,9
,2
,5
K-60
-------
APPENDIX K.CONT'D
ITSTING OF 1972 FEDERAL HOT START TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO,
782
788
790
791
795
YR MAKE MODL CID TEST TYPE
73 AMMO HORN 304 HOT
HOT
72
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
72
73 CADI DEVI 472 HOT
HOT
72
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
72
73 CHEV VEGA 140 HOT
HOT
72
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
72
73 CHEV VEGA 140 HOT
HOT
72
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
72
73 CHEV NOVA 307 HOT
HOT
72
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
72
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
7
8
8
3
3
3
8
9
9
9
11
10
8
12
10
4
4
4
4
3
3
3
2
3
7
7
7
2
2
2
HC
.78
.27
.03
.79
.23
.50
.92
.12
.02
.18
.85
.57
.04
.26
.24
.65
.26
.45
.41
.10
.73
.44
.77
.09
.32
.84
.59
.90
.29
.58
JRAMS PER MILE
CO C02
124.
141.
133.
38.
29.
33.
107.
126.
117.
95.
112.
104.
77.
92.
85.
52.
58.
55.
74.
88.
81.
60.
66.
63.
70.
43.
56.
63.
45.
54.
2
9
4
0
7
7
1
0
0
5
1
1
1
3
0
0
8
5
2
8
8
1
8
6
3
6
4
4
4
0
519
563
542
494
549
522
614
629
622
629
652
641
260
282
272
283
379
333
299
283
290
317
300
308
386
436
412
507
554
531
.2
.0
.0
.2
.1
.8
.7
.0
.1
.9
.6
.8
.1
.8
.0
.6
.5
.6
.3
.1
.9
.6
.8
.8
.3
.1
.3
.0
.4
.7
NOXC
1
0
1
3
2
2
2
1
1
2
1
1
1
0
1
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
0
.28
.93
.10
.48
.44
.94
.18
.35
.75
.17
.22
.67
.46
.85
.14
.66
.00
.32
.64
.98
.29
.91
.14
.51
.77
.66
.71
.03
.94
.98
MPG
FUEL
ECON
12.0
10.9
11.4
15.7
14.6
15.1
10.9
10.4
10.6
11 .0
10.2
10.6
21 .8
19.0
20.3
23.4
18.3
20.4
20.6
20.5
20.6
21 .0
21 .4
21 .2
17.1
16.8
16.9
14.4
14.0
14.2
K-61
-------
APPENDIX K.CONT'D
LISTING OF 1972 FEDERAL HOT START TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
WPG
V E,n
NO.
808
•
809
810
811
812
YR MAKE MODL CID TEST TYPE
73 CHEV STAW 454 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
73 CHRY NEWP 400 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
73 CHRY NEWY 440 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
73 DODG DART 225 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
73 DODG DART 318 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
HC CO C02 NOXC
12
7
9
5
6
5
6
6
6
5
4
4
4
3
3
2
2
2
4
4
4
4
2
3
3
3
3
2
2
2
.10
.54
.72
.39
.24
.83
.64
.29
.46
.66
.31
.95
.23
.76
.98
.78
.04
.40
.48
.12
.29
.17
.89
.50
.58
.83
.71
.68
.35
.51
147
108
126
101
86
94
126
115
120
103
63
82
37
34
35
37
35
36
99
93
96
81
52
66
59
91
76
28
26
27
.3
.1
.9
.9
.8
.0
.2
.3
.5
.6
.6
.8
.2
.3
.7
.4
.2
.3
.1
.8
.4
.2
.1
.0
.2
.5
.1
.0
.5
.2
638
734
688
611
687
651
483
546
516
525
640
585
586
677
633
706
842
777
314
348
332
337
401
371
407
438
423
432
494
464
.4
.2
.4
.4
.9
.3
.3
.3
.2
.8
.9
.8
.6
.1
.8
.8
.2
.4
.9
.2
.3
.9
.7
.2
.6
.2
.6
.8
.0
.7
1
1
1
2
1
1
2
1
2
2
1
1
3
1
2
2
1
1
1
0
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
2
1
4
1
,51
.14
,31
,13
,39
.89
,71
.61
,13
.15
.19
.65
,79
.81
.76
.47
.47
.95
.35
.76
,04
.42
_ f
.06
*\ i
.23
.03
4 1
.12
r c
.55
.08
ofl
.28
fi6
,00
FUEL
scon
9
9
9
11
10
10
12
11
12
12
11
12
13
11
12
11
9
10
18
17
18
1A
10
18
1 V
1?
ill
1 n
16
ltf
18
16
1?
,8
,6
,?
,3
,5
,9
,6
.9
,2
,6
,8
,1
,5
,9
,6
,5
.
.
,3
.
8
,»
,5
(0
3
i J
,3
,9
,0
,3
,3
,2
K-62
-------
APPENDIX K.CONT'D
ITSTING OF 1972 FEDERAL HOT START TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO,
813
811
820
821
822
YR MAKE MODL CID TEST TYPE
73 DODG CHAR 400 HOT TRANS
HOT
72
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
72
73 DODG DART 318 HOT
HOT
72
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
72
73 FORD MAVE 250 HOT
HOT
72
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
72
73 FORD MAVE 302 HOT
HOT
72
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
72
73 FORD MAVE 250 HOT
HOT
72
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
72
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
20
20
20
16
21
19
5
5
5
4
3
3
3
4
3
4
3
3
5
5
5
4
3
4
3
3
3
3.
3
3
HC
.12
.77
.46
.55
.24
.00
.33
.39
.36
.01
.31
.65
.69
.03
.87
.06
.33
.68
.16
.09
.12
.29
.89
.08
.50
.16
.32
.23
.34
.29
3RAMS PER MILE
CO C02
140
131
135
134
142
138
100
128
115
57
40
48
98
119
109
74
69
71
70
100
86
31
32
32
45
37
41
40
44
42
.0
.2
.4
.9
.6
.9
.8
.9
.4
.6
.1
.5
.2
.6
.3
.3
.5
.8
.8
.2
.2
.7
.4
.1
.7
.2
.3
.4
.8
.7
513
637
578
570
728
652
402
437
420
437
491
465
357
381
370
373
416
395
455
481
469
500
535
519
374
394
384
389
457
424
.9
.7
.4
.7
.4
.9
.2
.5
.6
.8
.5
.8
.5
.6
.1
.0
.8
.8
.8
.8
.3
.8
.6
.0
.1
.0
.5
.4
.1
.7
i
NOXC
1
0
1
1
0
0
1
0
1
1
1
1
1
0
1
2
1
1
1
0
1
2
1
2
4
2
3
2
1
2
.38
.86
.11
.19
.80
.98
.26
.76
.00
.62
.17
.39
.72
.67
.17
.22
.00
.59
.95
.84
.37
.83
.38
.07
.31
.77
.51
.25
.88
.06
MPG
FUEL
ECON
11.1
9.8
10.4
10.6
8.7
9.5
15.4
13.5
14.3
16.4
15.7
16.0
17.0
15.2
16.0
17.7
16.5
17.1
15.2
13.5
14.3
15.7
14.8
15.2
19.4
19.2
19.3
19.2
16.5
17.7
K-63
-------
APPENDIX K.CONT'D
LISTING OF 1972 FEDERAL HOT START TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
MPG
van
NO.
823
•
824
826
828
831
YR MAKE MODL CID TEST TYPE
73 FORD MUST 302 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
73 FORD MAVE 302 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
73 FORD LTD 429 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
73 FORD TORI 351 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
73 MERC COME 250 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
HC
8
10
9
8
10
9
5
4
4
5
4
4
7
5
6
8
4
6
4
4
4
4
3
4
4
3
3
4
2
3
.18
.14
.20
.21
.43
.37
.02
.49
.74
.45
.32
.86
.26
.89
.54
.07
.27
.09
.37
.86
.62
.71
.81
.24
.05
.61
.82
.13
.67
.37
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
jino r
CO
09
12
11
23
09
16
86
97
92
69
67
68
75
57
66
03
33
66
71
09
90
40
35
37
95
08
02
79
72
75
.3
.9
.2
.8
.3
.3
.0
.7
.1
.5
.5
.5
.9
.1
.1
.1
.1
.6
.1
.1
.9
.1
.8
.8
.2
.9
.3
.0
.4
.6
EI n nj.ijCi----._
C02 NOXC
427
449
438
446
526
488
467
507
488
509
590
552
617
680
650
626
754
693
526
569
549
511
584
549
349
383
367
396
465
432
.0
.8
.9
.3
.3
.0
.7
.4
.4
.7
.9
.0
.5
.6
.4
.6
.3
.2
.7
.5
.0
.7
.3
.6
.0
.7
.1
.8
.3
.5
2
1
1
0
0
0
1
0
1
1
0
0
1
1
1
2
1
2
2
1
1
3
1
2
2
0
1
2
0
,10
.22
.64
.81
.43
,61
.43
.70
.05
.19
.75
.96
.96
.02
.47
.45
.63
.02
.72
.16
,91
.84
.97
ft if
.87
,14
„(.
.76
li O
.42
.05
on
.89
IlK
.**"
FUEL
ECOH
11,2
13,5
13,8
13,3
12.1
12,7
11.3
13,1
13,1
13,9
12.5
13,1
9,?
9.1
9,5
10,9
* A 0
10,8
A A
10,9
13.6
4 < 1
11,1
40 &
12, o
15,1
13 6
lj.°
a 1
]H,J
IT,'
15.T
1 J i
16.'
1 v i
16,6
15,1
15.1
K-64
-------
APPENDIX K.CONT'D
TSTING OF 1972 FEDERAL HOT START TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO,
835
w J ~
837
839
840
8H2
YR MAKE MODL CID TEST TYPE
73 OLDS CUTL 350 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
73 OLDS CUTL 350 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
73 PLYM DUST 225 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
73 PLYM DUST 318 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
73 PLYM SATE 318 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
3
3
3
3
2
2
5
4
4
4
3
4
3
3
3
4
2
3
5
6
5
4
3
3
6
6
6
6
6
6
HC
.76
.95
.86
.27
.72
.98
.62
.23
.90
.84
.55
.16
.90
.22
.55
.63
.82
.68
.71
.24
.99
.20
.43
.80
.88
.93
.90
.19
.05
.12
3RAMS PER MILE
CO C02
96
114
105
75
60
67
54
41
47
57
37
46
58
47
52
57
34
45
82
112
98
53
41
47
173
182
178
146
136
141
.1
.7
.8
.6
.9
.9
.7
.8
.9
.1
.1
.6
.7
.3
.7
.6
.6
.6
.6
.5
.2
.3
.5
.1
.8
.3
.2
.0
.8
.2
563
596
580
605
682
645
495
569
533
545
631
590
353
360
357
351
390
371
393
431
412
429
496
464
377
422
400
399
473
437
.3
.6
.7
.6
.2
.5
.3
.3
.9
.9
.7
.6
.1
.6
.0
.4
.8
.9
.1
.2
.9
.8
.6
.6
. 1
.5
.8
.1
.2
.7
NOXC
1
1
1
1
1
1
3
1
2
2
1
2
4
2
3
2
2
2
1
0
1
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
.37
.01
.18
.48
.21
.34
.10
.46
.24
.61
.50
.03
.92
.94
.89
.56
.07
.31
.47
.73
.09
.54
.81
.16
.66
.51
.58
.85
.72
.78
MPG
FUEL
ECON
12
11
11
12
11
11
14
13
14
13
12
13
19
19
19
19
19
19
16
14
15
16
15
16
13
12
12
13
12
13
.2
.2
.7
.1
.3
.7
.8
.7
.2
.6
.7
.1
.4
.9
.7
.4
.5
.5
.4
.1
.1
.8
.5
.1
.2
.1
.6
.7
.5
.1
K-65
-------
APPENDIX K.CONT'D
LISTING OF 1972 FEDERAL HOT START TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO.
843
YR MAKE MODL CID TEST TYPE
73 PLYM FRY3 360 HOT
HOT
TRANS
STAB
72 FTP
•
844
845
846
849
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
72
73 PONT VENT 350 HOT
HOT
72
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
72
73 PONT LEMA 350 HOT
HOT
72
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
72
73 PONT LEMA 350 HOT
HOT
72
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
72
73 PONT STAW 400 HOT
HOT
72
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
72
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
GRAMS PER MILE
HC CO C02 NOXC
4
3
4
3
2
3
6
7
7
6
5
6
6
6
6
6
8
7
6
8
7
5
4
5
4
4
4
2
2
2
.57
.78
.16
.68
.44
.03
.78
.43
.12
.31
.86
.07
.14
.60
.38
.23
.20
.26
.92
.76
.88
.06
.98
.02
.19
.55
.38
.65
.06
.34
77
88
83
56
36
45
55
59
57
50
42
45
109
105
107
44
28
36
85
146
117
43
42
42
68
77
73
51
31
40
.4
.3
.1
.0
.6
.9
.8
.7
.8
.0
.3
.9
.9
.0
.3
.3
.6
.1
.9
.6
.6
.2
.1
.6
.2
.9
.2
.5
.0
.8
522
593
559
542
629
587
472
506
490
481
553
518
532
585
560
517
563
541
511
533
522
525
600
564
618
679
650
697
807
754
.0
.3
.2
.3
.9
.9
.5
.7
.3
.1
.5
.9
.3
.8
.2
.9
.5
.7
.6
.4
.9
.8
.6
.8
.1
.3
.0
.8
.0
.7
4
2
3
4
2
3
4
1
2
3
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
1
2
3
2
3
1
1
1
1
1
,38
.12
.20
.76
.53
.60
.21
.72
.93
.12
.33
.19
.«
.19
.33
.97
.11
.70
.20
.11
.28
.68
n A
.99
.32
.96
— fj
.27
f A
,60
.16
tf.
.1°
on
.3°
MPG
FUEL
ECON
13,5
11.9
* • /
12,6
13,8
12.8
13,3
15,3
11,2
11,7
15,3
13,9
11,5
12,3
11,5
11.8
11,6
11,0
11,3
13.3
.4 1
11,2
in 4
12,1
lU
13 0
i jiu
41 7
Ij'1
12,0
10 9
| V 1 *
11 »
1 1 1
11,3
10,3
10,?
K-66
-------
APPENDIX K.CONT'D
ITSTING OF 1972 FEDERAL HOT START TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
MPG
VEH
NO,
850
851
852
855
856
YR MAKE MODL CID TEST TYPE
73 DATS B610 108 HOT
HOT
72
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
72
73 DATS 240Z 146 HOT
HOT
72
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
72
73 BOND CIVI 71 HOT
HOT
72
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
72
73 MG CONV 110 HOT
HOT
72
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
72
73 PORS 914 102 HOT
HOT
72
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
72
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
5
6
5
4
3
3
4
2
3
4
2
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
5
7
6
9
11
10
HC
.43
.43
.95
.08
.64
.65
.77
.28
.47
.77
.12
.39
.11
.52
.33
.71
.82
.77
.41
.47
.44
.54
.66
.60
.84
.21
.56
.62
.22
.46
n A ri o r
CO
44
53
49
41
38
39
33
27
30
31
25
27
39
46
43
42
43
42
46
44
45
55
55
55
35
42
39
42
51
47
.5
. 1
.0
.5
.1
.7
.2
.9
.4
.0
.1
.9
.9
.5
.3
.2
.1
.7
.7
.5
.6
.9
.4
.6
.6
.2
.0
.9
.1
.2
on rij. LI c
C02
282
303
293
307
340
325
337
397
368
338
430
386
194
231
213
214
243
229
294
356
326
293
353
324
339
373
356
311
340
326
.3
.4
.3
.8
.8
.0
.3
.4
.6
.2
.2
.2
.1
.9
.8
.3
.3
.4
.3
.3
.7
.0
.2
.4
.2
.0
.8
.6
.7
.8
NOXC
2
1
2
1
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
.48
.56
.00
.89
.93
.39
.91
.33
.61
.52
.20
.35
.16
.61
.87
.05
.52
.77
.06
.67
.86
.06
.75
.90
.60
.00
.29
.99
.19
.58
r utij
ECON
24.0
21 .8
22.8
23.0
21.5
22.2
21 .9
19.8
20.8
22.1
18.6
20.1
33.7
28.4
30.7
30.7
27.7
29.1
23.6
20.4
21.9
22.8
19.8
21.1
21 .5
19.2
20.2
21 .7
19.4
20.4
K-67
-------
APPENDIX K.CONT'D
LISTING OF 1972 FEDERAL HOT START TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO.
857
YR MAKE MODL CID TEST TYPE
73 TOYO STAW 97 HOT
HOT
TRANS
STAB
72 FTP
•
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
TRANS
STAB
72 FTP
860
863
864
076
73 SUBA STAW 83 HOT
HOT
72
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
72
73 VOLK SEDA 97 HOT
HOT
72
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
72
73 VOLV 142S 121 HOT
HOT
72
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
72
72 AMMO GREM 258 HOT
HOT
72
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
•7 1
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
i?Tn
r.
HC
4
6
5
2
2
2
3
4
4
3
3
3
4
5
5
5
6
5
7
10
8
4
5
5
28
30
29
2
2
o
.63
.57
.64
.53
.99
.77
.90
.17
.04
.53
.61
.57
.66
.59
.14
.42
.09
.77
.18
.46
.89
.80
.43
.13
.78
.67
.76
.67
.60
C 0
IRAMS P
CO
60
81
71
40
57
49
53
62
58
45
49
47
59
67
63
68
60
64
88
104
97
71
79
75
95
102
99
34
38
o£
.3
.2
.2
.0
.7
.2
.7
.4
.2
.6
.2
.5
.8
.1
.6
.7
.2
.3
;7
.9
.1
.6
.9
.9
.4
.3
.0
.4
.8
•7
ER MILE
C02 NOXC
238
258
248
256
279
268
250
287
269
257
307
283
246
284
266
251
312
283
261
281
272
272
296
285
294
295
295
331
405
QfiQ
.2
.3
.7
.1
.6
.4
.1
.9
.8
.1
.4
.3
.6
.1
.2
.3
.1
.0
.4
.8
.0
.6
.7
.2
.9
.6
.3
.3
.0
.7
2
1
1
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
2
2
.17
.10
.61
.60
.70
.13
.86
.65
.75
.99
.70
,81
.30
.60
.93
.90
.56
.72
.66
.06
.35
.77
* Ii
.11
ii h
.11
.15
nil
.01
r* f
.57
.26
op
,oc.
.03
HPG
FUEL
ECON
25,5
21,8
23,5
27,1
23,1
25,0
25,6
22,2
23,7
26.1
22,1
21,0
25,0
21,8
23,2
23,6
20,8
22,1
21,0
A ft C
18,5
in d
19- b
22,2
on 2
£i/,'
71 1
i I •
16,6
16,0
I * *
16,3
22,5
18,T
20,'
K-68
-------
APPENDIX K.CONT'D
ITSTING OF 1972 FEDERAL HOT START TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO.
077
078
079
080
081
YR MAKE MODL CID TEST TYPE
72 BUIC RIVI 455 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
72 CADI DEVI 472 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
72 CHEV VEGA 140 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
72 CHEV MALI 350 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
72 CHEV CHEL 350 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
t
HC
4.
4.
4.
3.
4.
3.
3.
3.
3.
5.
4.
4.
4.
2.
3.
3.
3.
3.
4.
5.
4.
2.
2.
2.
3.
3.
3.
3.
2.
3.
69
88
79
89
08
99
24
88
58
41
14
75
00
82
39
52
12
31
35
05
72
64
88
77
52
07
28
56
85
19
}RAMS P
CO
57
89
74
38
39
39
102
135
119
205
189
197
59
46
52
55
45
50
75
125
101
47
58
53
49
50
49
40
33
36
.6
.2
.0
.3
.6
.0
.0
.4
.4
.9
.7
.4
.6
.3
.7
.9
.0
.2
.3
.2
.3
.6
.7
.4
.4
.0
.7
.3
.4
.7
ER MILE
C02
581
624
603
610
666
639
653
688
671
691
735
714
311
434
375
330
411
372
409
411
410
493
551
524
440
518
480
486
550
519
.7
.2
.9
.3
.4
.6
.5
.0
.5
.8
.6
.6
.9
.2
.7
.6
.8
.9
.7
.5
.6
.6
.9
.0
.1
.4
.9
.4
.4
.8
NOXC
7
4
6
7
4
6
2
0
1
1
0
1
1
1
1
1
0
1
3
1
2
2
1
2
2
1
1
2
1
1
.93
.32
.04
.65
.91
.23
.01
.91
.43
.27
.83
.04
.77
.15
.45
.35
.91
.12
.72
.28
.45
.65
.43
.01
.45
.18
.79
.30
.49
.88
MPG
FUEL
ECON
12
1 1
12
13
12
12
10
9
10
8
8
8
21
17
18
20
18
19
16
14
15
15
13
14
16
14
15
15
14
15
.9
.4
.1
.0
.0
.4
.8
.7
.2
.6
.5
.5
.2
.2
.9
.7
.0
.2
.4
.2
.2
.4
.6
.4
.8
.6
.6
.8
.5
.1
K-69
-------
APPENDIX K.CONT'D
LISTING OF 1972 FEDERAL HOT START TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO.
082
•
083
084
085
086
YR MAKE MODL CID TEST TYPE
72 CHEV NOVA 307 HOT
HOT
72
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
72
72 CHEV IMPA 350 HOT
HOT
72
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
72
72 CHEV BELA 400 HOT
HOT
72
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
72
72 DODG CORO 318 HOT
HOT
72
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
72
72 FORD PINT 122 HOT
HOT
72
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
72
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
GRAMS PER MILE
HC CO C02 NOXC
6
7
7
4
3
3
6
6
6
5
5
5
5
6
5
3
2
3
4
3
3
4
4
4
3
5
4
2
2
2
;74
.35
.05
.31
.45
.86
.75
.16
.44
.61
.00
.29
.63
.28
.97
.73
.70
.19
.23
.56
.88
.10
.16
.13
.92
.33
.65
.14
.35
.25
65
75
71
43
19
31
98
112
105
75
66
70
70
83
77
61
40
50
56
35
45
59
78
69
58
66
62
36
35
35
.9
.9
.1
.4
.9
.1
.2
.3
.6
.1
.4
.6
.5
.9
.5
.3
.4
.4
.0
.3
.2
.6
.7
.6
.3
.6
.6
.1
.5
.8
442
458
451
499
553
527
518
562
541
538
631
587
519
560
540
570
672
623
446
502
475
444
487
466
272
293
283
286
335
311
.9
.3
.0
.2
.8
.6
.1
.2
.1
.8
.6
.2
.5
.2
.7
.6
.7
.9
.6
.8
.9
.8
.1
.9
.5
.6
.5
.4
.1
.8
3
2
2
4
2
3
2
1
2
3
1
2
4
2
3
4
2
3
4
3
3
3
2
2
4
3
3
2
,57
.12
.81
.09
.69
.36
.70
,43
,03
.09
.91
.19
.82
.90
.82
.77
.71
.71
.05
.01
.52
.61
_ it
.21
.91
.61
«9 A
.30
.92
.53
' 0?
.?*•
MPG
FUEL
ECON
15,6
11,8
15,2
15,3
11,9
15,1
12,8
11,7
12.2
13,2
11,8
12,1
13,7
12,5
13,0
13,1
11.9
12,1
16.2
tc (,
15-0
15,
16,1
.11 9
I1*,'
• c 1
15, '
23,6
21,'
£ ' '
'
25.'
22,3
23,7
K-70
-------
APPENDIX K.CONT'D
TING OF 1972 FEDERAL HOT START TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
«u TMDTVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
ON INDIVIDUAL
DENVER
VEH
NO,
087
088
089
090
091
YR MAKE MODL CID TEST TYPE
72 FORD GRNT 351 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
72 FORD MAVE 200 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
72 FORD GALA 351 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
72 FORD STAW 400 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
72 MERC MONG 400 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
4
3
4
4
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
3
7
3
5
5
3
4
5
4
4
3
2
3
4
2
3
3
1
2
HC
.41
.71
.05
.34
.07
.68
.55
.35
.44
.26
.91
.08
.31
.40
.27
.26
.09
.12
.01
.01
.49
.70
.51
.08
.20
.62
.38
.09
.96
.50
RAMS PER MILE
CO C02
52
56
54
41
18
29
37
55
47
34
40
37
49
65
57
61
76
69
67
73
70
53
42
47
33
19
26
35
20
27
.8
.7
.8
.0
.4
.2
.8
.7
.1
.2
.1
.3
.3
.7
.9
.5
.6
.3
.7
.9
.9
.6
.7
.9
.4
.4
.1
.2
.9
.8
524
590
558
508
599
555
339
350
3*5
354
364
359
565
654
611
603
681
644
533
560
547
588
661
626
590
648
621
658
771
717
-7
.0
.7
.0
.3
.6
.9
.6
.5
.3
.4
.5
.4
.0
.6
.3
.3
.0
.0
.6
.4
.2
.7
.5
.7
.7
.0
.9
.4
.5
NOXC
4
3
3
3
2
2
5
1
3
6
3
4
4
1
3
2
1
2
5
3
4
5
3
3
5
3
4
5
3
4
.72
.21
.93
.39
.58
.97
.21
.99
.53
.55
.18
.80
.38
.94
.11
.76
.38
.04
.79
.67
.69
.04
.03
.99
.94
.05
.44
.34
.08
.16
MPG
FUEL
ECON
14
12
13
15
13
14
21
19
20
21
20
20
13
11
12
12
10
11
13
12
13
13
12
12
13
12
13
12
11
11
.3
.8
.5
. 1
.9
.5
.6
.8
.6
.2
.3
.7
.3
.6
.3
.4
.9
.6
.5
.9
.2
.0
.0
.5
.5
.9
.2
.3
.0
.5
K-71
-------
APPENDIX K.CONT'D
LISTING OF 1972 FEDERAL HOT START TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO.
092
•
093
094
095
096
YR MAKE MODL CID TEST TYPE
72 OLDS CUTL 350 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
72 PLYM VALI 225 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
72 PLYM FURY 360 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
72 PONT CATA 400 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
72 PONT LEMA 350 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
GRAMS PER MILE
HC CO C02 NOXC
5
4
5
3
2
3
9
13
11
4
3
3
8
6
7
3
3
3
5
5
5
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
3
3
.97
.86
.39
.69
.68
.16
.82
.06
.51
.41
.18
.77
.55
.51
.49
.90
.30
.59
.23
;29
.81
.56
.68
.50
.53
.52
.80
.22
.Q8
100
153
128
48
54
52
139
191
167
70
50
59
160
177
169
56
36
45
57
68
63
45
36
40
73
88
81
57
43
•50
.8
.1
.1
.9
.9
.1
.9
.8
.0
.1
.0
.6
.3
.3
.2
.0
.2
.7
.8
.5
.4
.0
.0
.3
.0
.9
.3
.8
.7
.5
419
437
428
486
570
529
278
256
267
343
370
357
445
482
464
511
593
554
536
580
559
567
633
601
481
545
514
514
605
.1
.2
.5
.0
.1
.9
.5
.5
.1
.8
.1
.5
.3
.8
.8
.1
.7
.2
.8
.5
.6
.2
.8
.9
.7
.4
.9
.0
.5
.7
1
0
1
1
0
1
2
0
1
3
1
2
2
1
1
3
2
3
4
2
3
4
2
3
2
1
2
1
.75
.71
.21
.81
.93
.35
.45
.93
,66
.14
.71
.39
.04
.62
.82
.77
.85
.29
.59
.63
.57
.05
.52
— (-
.25
.60
1A
. 9
fifi
.00
.36
111
.1'
.86
HPG
FUEL
ECON
14
12
13
15
13
111
16
14
15
19
19
19
12
11
11
14
13
13
13
4 A
12
4 *5
13
13
i?
14
12
1 *•
13
14
13
13
.5
,8
,4
,3
,3
,8
,8
•1
,0
.3
,2
,3
,3
,8
,5
,1
.9
.8
c
,0
1 *
,6
j
.5
,T
,5
,3
,0
16
K-72
-------
APPENDIX K.CONT'D
ITSTING OF 1972 FEDERAL HOT START TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO,
097
098
099
100
396
YR MAKE MODL CID TEST TYPE
72 DATS 510 97 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
72 TOYO CORO 120 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
72 VOLK KARM 97 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
72 VOLK KOMB 103 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
72 CHEV KING 350 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
3
3
4
3
3
3
3
3
3
4
3
4
5
5
4
6
5
5
5
5
5
4
4
---fi
HC
.20
.62
.42
.54
.35
.44
.04
.49
.75
.30
.37
.82
.12
.52
.33
.89
.02
.96
.30
.90
.13
.95
.42
.72
.48
.42
.45
.03
.20
.60
RAMS P
CO
30
36
33
37
36
37
31
46
39
25
41
34
47
41
44
53
55
54
53
58
56
35
43
39
89
96
93
65
46
55
.2
.2
.3
.8
.7
.2
.5
.0
.1
.8
.9
.2
.8
.6
.6
.4
.6
.5
.9
.4
.3
.1
.1
.3
.8
.1
.1
.0
.0
.1
ER MILE
C02
270
289
280
263
292
278
282
306
295
271
279
275
238
282
261
236
276
257
349
412
382
340
385
363
525
576
552
553
627
591
.1
.1
.0
.5
.7
.7
.9
.3
.1
.3
.4
.5
.4
.9
.6
.7
.0
.2
.0
.6
.1
.0
.6
.8
.6
.4
.1
.1
.1
.7
NOXC
2
1
2
2
1
1
3
1
2
4
2
3
1
1
1
1
0
1
2
1
1
2
1
1
1
2
1
3
2
3
.61
.68
.12
.22
.45
.82
.87
.98
.88
.23
.11
.13
.67
.19
.42
.40
.83
.10
.01
.41
.69
.35
.43
.87
.39
.40
.92
.98
.30
.10
MPG
FUEL
ECON
26
24
25
26
24
25
25
22
24
27
24
26
27
24
25
26
23
25
19
17
18
21
18
20
13
11
12
13
12
12
.8
.6
.6
.3
.4
.3
.7
.8
.1
.3
.9
.0
.4
.7
.9
.7
.6
.0
.8
.0
.2
.6
.7
.0
.0
.9
.4
.2
.5
.8
K-73
-------
APPENDIX K.CONT'D
LISTING OF 1972 FEDERAL HOT START TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO.
398
YR MAKE MODL CID TEST TYPE
72 CHRY NEWP 400 HOT
HOT
TRANS
STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
TRANS
STAB
72 FTP
400
401
404
410
72 DODG DART 318 HOT
HOT
72
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
72
72 FORD PINT 122 HOT
HOT
72
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
72
72 FORD LTD 429 HOT
HOT
72
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
72
72 PLYM VALI 318 HOT
HOT
72
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72
FTP
r.
HC
5
4
5
5
3
4
5
5
5
13
17
15
6
6
6
6
6
6
7
7
7
5
3
4
6
5
5
4
3
3
.31
.92
.11
.33
.93
.60
.88
.75
.81
.84
.29
.64
.15
.24
.20
.42
.74
.59
.41
.63
.52
.10
.31
.16
.09
.33
.69
.15
.44
.78
1RAMS PER MILE
CO C02 NOXC
80
78
79
69
34
51
81
97
89
51
39
45
60
50
55
62
50
56
102
128
116
63
24
43
73
96
85
46
36
41
.7
.2
.4
.6
.2
.1
.8
.1
.8
.3
.4
.1
.5
.5
.2
.2
.6
.2
.2
.6
.0
.7
.5
.2
.3
.9
.6
.9
.4
.4
540
584
563
557
632
596
374
388
382
408
470
440
304
334
320
304
323
314
523
519
521
575
643
611
368
379
373
422
473
449
.6
.1
.3
.6
.6
.7
.7
.7
.0
.3
.2
.6
.4
.6
.2
.9
.5
.6
.6
.6
.5
.8
.9
.3
.0
.0
.7
.8
.7
.3
5
2
3
4
2
3
2
1
1
2
1
1
2
2
2
3
2
2
5
3
4
4
2
3
3
1
2
2
1
,06
.72
.84
.69
.93
.77
.28
.28
.76
.09
.23
.64
.90
.02
.44
.30
.64
.95
.30
.01
.11
.27
o o
.88
.55
.27
f- A
.52
-------
APPENDIX K.CONT'D
ITSTING OF 1972 FEDERAL HOT START TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO,
865
871
877
883
885
YR MAKE MODL CID TEST TYPE
72 AMMO GREM 232 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
72 CHEV VEGA 140 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
72 CHEV NOVA 307 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
72 CHEV MALI 307 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
72 CHEV CHEL 350 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
6
7
6
5
6
5
3
3
3
2
2
2
6
5
5
5
4
4
6
9
8
4
3
4
4
4
4
3
3
3
HC
.53
.34
.95
.61
.14
.89
.23
.18
.20
.67
.61
.64
.05
.48
.75
.07
.88
.97
.95
.32
.19
.42
.85
.12
.74
.91
.83
.45
.69
.57
JRAMS PER MILE
CO C02
80
89
84
83
87
85
64
67
66
38
36
37
76
77
76
81
74
77
113
132
123
81
53
66
64
100
82
51
76
64
.0
.2
.8
.8
.4
.7
.9
.6
.3
.9
.0
.4
.4
.0
.7
.7
.3
.9
.9
.2
.5
.2
.7
.8
.2
.1
.9
.3
.2
.3
295
335
316
296
334
316
226
257
242
224
267
246
407
446
427
437
505
473
347
366
357
395
475
436
438
463
451
478
526
503
.8
.6
.6
.4
.2
.1
.9
.6
.9
.2
.0
.5
.1
.4
.6
.6
.8
.2
.0
.1
.0
.2
.1
.8
.9
.8
.9
.6
.4
.5
NOXC
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
3
2
2
2
1
1
1
0
1
1
1
1
3
1
2
3
1
2
.93
.04
.47
.91
.01
.44
.35
.10
.22
.69
.15
.41
.74
.14
.91
.34
.36
.83
.17
.91
.03
.45
.15
.30
.66
.44
.50
.19
.44
.28
MPG
FUEL
ECON
20
17
18
19
18
18
26
23
24
30
26
28
16
15
15
15
13
14
16
14
15
16
15
16
16
13
14
15
13
14
.1
.8
.8
.9
.1
.9
.2
.7
.8
.2
.7
.3
.2
.2
.7
.3
.9
.5
.2
.7
.4
.5
.5
.0
.0
.9
.9
.6
.5
.4
K-75
-------
APPENDIX K.CONT'D
LISTING OF 1972 FEDERAL HOT START TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
MPG
VEH
NO.
886
YR MAKE MODL CID TEST TYPE
72 CHEV MONT 350 HOT
HOT
TRANS
STAB
72 FTP
•
887
889
890
891
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
72
72 CHEV NOVA 350 HOT
HOT
72
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
72
72 CHEV MONT 350 HOT
HOT
72
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
72
72 CHEV NOVA 350 HOT
HOT
72
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
72
72 CHEV MONT 400 HOT
HOT
72
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
•7 O
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
PTD
G
HC
5
5
5
4
3
3
5
6
6
4
4
4
4
5
4
3
2
2
9
16
13
8
14
11
4
6
5
3
3
o
.15
.83
.51
.03
.61
.81
.41
.62
.04
.10
.33
.22
.57
.09
.84
.26
.55
.89
.90
.46
.32
.74
.18
.58
.84
.65
.78
.65
.71
£fl
[RAMS P
CO
105
135
121
47
35
41
83
144
115
54
67
61
79
116
98
45
33
39
30
34
32
67
103
86
59
95
77
59
58
cR
.8
.1
.1
.7
.6
.4
.6
.1
.1
.6
.6
.3
.9
.4
.9
.4
.1
.0
.6
.3
.5
.4
.4
.2
.1
.1
.8
.3
;2
T
ER MILE
C02 NOXC
474
516
496
489
570
531
440
464
452
480
553
518
472
493
483
501
569
537
508
610
561
542
632
589
489
545
518
506
643
577
.8
.6
.6
.1
.2
.4
.5
.3
.9
.5
.1
.4
.2
.9
.5
.6
.4
.0
.0
.6
.5
.3
.7
.4
.3
.2
.4
.5
.5
.Q
1
1
1
2
1
2
2
0
1
2
1
1
3
1
2
2
1
1
4
2
3
2
1
2
2
1
1
1
0
1
,62
.04
.32
.74
.70
.20
.46
.86
.63
.36
.18
.74
.73
.56
.60
.35
.43
.87
.35
.22
.24
.74
A r
.35
.02
.71
4 o
.13
A A
.89
.78
n n
.77
.25
FUEL
ECON
13,5
11,9
12,6
15,1
13,9
11,6
15,1
12,5
13,6
15,3
13.2
11,1
11,5
12.8
13,6
15,2
11,1
i. t
11,6
15,1
41 1
12,1
13 (i
13.°
13.1
10 6
| U i v
11 7
Hi'
11,9
12,1
1 (• i
n,5
i j '
11,5
11.'
i * •
13-0
K-76
-------
APPENDIX K.CONT'D
TTSTING OF 1972 FEDERAL HOT START TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO, YR MAKE MODL CID TEST TYPE
894 72 CHRY NEWP 400 HOT
HOT
72
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
72
895 72 DODG DART 225 HOT
HOT
72
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
72
897 72 DODG DART 318 HOT
HOT
72
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
72
898 72 DODG POLA 360 HOT
HOT
72
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
72
99 72 FORD PINT 122 HOT
HOT
72
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
72
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
6
5
6
6
6
6
4
4
4
3
3
3
6
8
7
4
3
3
11
14
13
5
4
4
4
4
4
3
3
3
HC
.56
.57
.04
.68
.15
.40
.38
.17
.27
.56
.12
.33
.71
.20
.49
.05
.42
.72
.43
.69
.13
.45
.42
.91
.14
.14
.14
.59
.25
.41
5RAMS PER MILE
CO C02
128
142
136
138
158
148
97
95
96
66
55
60
90
139
115
41
24
32
145
184
165
135
90
112
48
55
52
31
26
29
.9
.6
.0
.1
.5
.7
.1
.9
.4
.1
.1
.4
.2
.3
.8
.0
.8
.5
.8
.0
.7
.8
.8
.3
.9
.1
.1
.9
.7
.2
482
515
500
501
560
532
284
294
289
315
336
326
406
420
413
467
542
506
408
430
419
511
614
565
277
279
278
294
307
300
.9
.6
.0
.4
.2
.0
.4
.4
.6
.5
.2
.3
.8
.3
.8
.9
.8
.9
.2
.2
.6
.6
.9
.4
.1
.7
.4
.0
.2
.9
NOXC
2
1
1
2
1
1
2
1
1
2
1
2
3
1
2
2
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
3
3
3
3
2
3
.89
.13
.97
.28
.00
.61
.06
.39
.71
.61
.62
.09
.30
.88
.56
.90
.89
.38
.06
.25
.64
.57
.19
.37
.73
.04
.37
.63
.45
.02
MPG
FUEL
ECON
12
11
12
12
10
11
19
19
19
20
20
20
15
13
14
16
15
15
13
11
12
12
11
11
24
23
23
25
24
24
.6
.7
.1
.0
.7
.3
.7
.4
.5
.6
.5
.6
.6
.3
.3
.3
.0
.6
.2
.6
.3
.0
.5
.7
.2
.4
.8
.0
.7
.8
K-77
-------
APPENDIX K.CONT'D
LISTING OF 1972 FEDERAL HOT START TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO.
900
901
902
903
904
YR MAKE MODL CID TEST TYPE
72 FORD PINT 98 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
72 FORD PINT 98 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
72 FORD MAVE 200 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
72 FORD MUST 351 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
72 FORD MAVE 302 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
n
HC
4
5
4
5
4
5
4
5
4
3
4
3
4
4
4
3
3
3
5
4
4
5
2
3
7
10
8
4
4
4
.76
.20
.99
.72
.42
.04
.46
.24
.87
.90
.01
.96
.28
.12
.19
.42
.24
.33
.19
.21
.68
.03
.83
.88
.36
.43
.96
.86
.54
.69
RAMS PER MILE
CO C02
57
32
44
61
32
46
67
55
61
52
32
41
100
152
127
61
92
77
42
23
32
53
37
45
48
49
48
47
50
49
.1
.1
.0
.1
.2
.0
.3
.9
.3
.8
.0
.9
.7
.3
.6
.3
.0
.3
.4
.1
.3
.9
.0
.1
.2
.6
.9
.8
.1
.0
254.
306.
281.
248.
307.
279.
229.
261.
246.
240.
281.
261.
293.
382.
339.
290.
382.
338.
573.
63^.
605.
678.
805.
744.
420.
434.
427.
436.
469.
453.
3
0
3
5
1
1
4
5
2
8
0
7
4
7
9
5
0
2
3
3
1
2
1
4
2
0
4
5
6
7
NOXC
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
2
3
2
1
1
5
2
3
2
1
.00
.23
,12
.23
,66
.45
.20
.05
.12
.68
.69
.68
.60
.43
.51
,90
.51
.70
.19
.41
.26
.58
i, it
.44
n 0
.98
.00
4 fl
.19
r II
,54
.59
f\ A
.20
07
.01
MPG
FUEL
ECON
24
23
24
24
23
24
25
24
24
26
25
26
19
14
16
22
16
18
13
4 1
13
4 1
13
11
10
IV
17
16
p v
16
f v
16
15
i /
16
"J
,8
,2
,5
,9
,2
,1
,3
,8
,1
,8
.1
.1
,0
,0
,3
,5
,9
,5
.
•)
,c
,1
tl
'i
1 '
,1
,3
,8
,8
,3
K-78
-------
APPENDIX K.CONT'D
ITSTING OF 1972 FEDERAL HOT START TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO,
906
907
909
911
912
YR MAKE MODL CID TEST TYPE
72 FORD HAVE 250 HOT
HOT
72
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
72
72 FORD GALA 400 HOT
HOT
72
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
72
72 FORD LTD 429 HOT
HOT
72
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
72
72 FORD GALA 400 HOT
HOT
72
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
72
72 MERC COME 250 HOT
HOT
72
AFTER MTCE. HOT
HOT
72
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
TRANS
STAB
FTP
r
HC
6.
7.
7.
4.
3.
3.
5.
5.
5.
4.
3.
3.
5.
3.
4.
3.
2.
2.
5.
4.
5.
4.
3.
3.
4.
4.
4.
4,.
4.
4.
77
26
03
41
28
82
96
12
52
02
15
56
06
68
34
42
45
91
44
62
OT
37
31
82
79
59
68
T4
74
14
JRAMS P
CO
74
111
94
44
35
39
86
103
95
69
50
59
71
35
52
61
26
43
60
88
75
3T
32
32
59
79
70
40
4T
40
.6
.8
.0
.0
.5
.6
.4
.0
.1
.0
.3
.3
.5
.7
.9
.2
.2
.0
.4
.7
.1>
.6
.3
.0
.9
.6
.2
.0
.5
.8
ER MILE
C02
325
308
316
357
393
375
492
511
502
541
626
585
581
658
621
583
681
634
557
562
560
550
584
568
379
398
389
393
427
4TT
.6
.7
.8
.0
.3
.9
.7
.5
.5
.2
.0
.4
.2
.6
.6
.8
.8
.9
.2
.9
.2
.8
.7
.4
.5
.6
.4
.7
.5
.3
NOXC
4
2
3
4
3
4
4
2
3
3
2
2
5
3
4
4
3
3
2
1
2
5
3
4
4
2
3
4
2
3
.16
.28
.18
.99
.20
.05
.30
.37
.29
.30
.19
.72
.13
.43
.24
.55
.14
.81
.95
.70
.30
.95
.21
.52
.58
.46
.47
.57
.78
.64
MPG
FUEL
ECON
19.1
17.5
18.2
20.2
19.3
19.7
13.7
12.9
13.3
13.4
12.4
12.9
12.5
12.2
12.4
12.8
12.1
12.5
13.3
T2.4
T2.8
14.4
T3.7
14.1
T8.2
16.5
T7.2
T8.9
17. 5
18.2
K-79
-------
APPENDIX K.CONT'D
LISTING OF 1972 FEDERAL HOT START TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO.
919
925
929
930
931
YR MAKE MODL CID TEST TYPE
72 PLYM VALI 198 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
72 PONT LEMA 350 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
72 DATS B110 72 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
72 DATS 510 97 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
72 OPEL T900 116 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
GRAMS PER MILE
HC CO C02 NOXC
7
8
7
4
3
4
5
5
5
4
3
3
4
3
3
3
2
2
3
4
3
3
4
4
2
2
2
2
3
2
.21
.12
.68
.74
.75
.22
.85
.65
.75
.20
.47
.82
.25
.63
.93
.07
.74
.89
.66
.08
.88
.65
.49
.09
.99
.98
.98
.75
.12
.94
84
89
87
52
3t
41
77
T14
96
56
50
53
35
42
38
21
27
24
25
34
30
26
37
32
23
37
30
9
T3
If
.8
.2
. 1
.4
.6
.5
.6
.6
.9
.1
.3
.1
.1
.2
.8
.0
.9
.6
.7
,T
.T
.8
.9
.6
.2
.1
.4
.3
.2
.4
292
299
295
306
350
328
477
516
497
519
617
570
234
249
242
224
249
237
255
272
264
252
269
26T
340
333
336
372
375
373
.0
,T
.7
.0
.1
.9
.3
.8
.9
.9
.1
.6
.5
.5
.3
.1
.0
.1
.6
.1
.2
.7
.8
.6
.f
.5
.7
.5
.0
.
2
1
2
3
2
3
3
1
2
2
1
T
2
1
2
2
1
t
3
T
2
4
2
3
5
2
11
3
1
.97
,90
.11
.56
.57
.01
.05
.07
.02
.51
.21
.86
.92
.89
.38
.29
.T3
.68
.01
.72
.35
.23
_ ft
.58
*\ rv
,37
.68
o r
.85
— A
.20
.50
O 1
.87
fi<5
,ov
HPG
FUEL
ECON
19
19
19
22
21
21
14
12
13
n
12
13
29
27
28
33
29
31
28
-/
26
f.ft
21
29
97
£1
23
22
22
21
if '
22
,8
,1
,1
,0
,6
,8
j
J
,3
,3
,6
,3
,3
,1
,1
,3
^
,1
,9
.
i
,0
g
. V
1
I J
,0
,1
i
,5
',9
,1
K-80
-------
APPENDIX K.CONT'D
LISTING OF 1972 FEDERAL HOT START TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO,
932
933
935
YR MAKE MODL CID TEST TYPE
72 TOYO CORO 71 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
72 TOYO STAW 97 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
72 VOLK CONV 97 HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
AFTER MTCE. HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
72 FTP
3
3
3
4
5
5
3
3
3
3
3
3
4
5
5
5
6
5
HC
.80
.76
.78
.76
.63
.27
.87
.76
.8?
.29
.3T
.30
.94
.96
.48
.00
.19
.62
RAMS P
CO
60
57
59
39
41
40
59
61
60
63
62
63
72
94
84
56
88
73
.1
.9
.0
.1
.7
.4
.0
.2
.1
.9
.9
.4
.7
.8
.2
.4
.5
. 1
ER MILE
C02
252
303
279
252
298
276
250
244
247
278
289
284
300
344
323
281
300
291
.5
.8
.3
.8
.4
.6
.9
.6
.6
.6
.7
.4
.3
.2
.2
.4
.4
.3
NOXC
1
0
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
1
1
0
1
.44
.99
.21
.77
.12
.43
.28
.10
.66
.83
.79
.29
.44
.98
.20
.78
.31
.01
MPG
FUEL
ECON
24
27
23
27
23
24
24
25
25
22
22
22
20
77
18
23
79
20
.7
.8
.7
.0
.2
.9
.9
.2
.1
.8
.2
.5
.6
.3
.8
.0
.3
.9
K-81
-------
K-82
-------
APPENDIX L
-------
APPENDIX L
LISTING OF FEDERAL SHORT TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
Legend
VEH NO. - Vehicle Number
YR - Model Year
MAKE - Vehicle Make
MODL - Vehicle Model
CID - Engine Displacement in Cubic Inches
TEST TYPE - Indicates the Type of Test
SHORT TEST - Federal Short Test
REPLICATE - Repeat of Federal Short Test
HC - Hydrocarbon Emissions in grams per mile
CO - Carbon Monoxide Emissions in grams per mile
C02 - Carbon Dioxide Emissions in grams per mile
NOXC - Oxides of Nitrogen Emissions Corrected for Humidity
in grams per mile
FUEL ECON - Fuel Economy Calculated by the Carbon Balance Method
in miles per gallon
AFTER MICE. - Presents test results after vehicle maintenance
L-l
-------
VFH
NO.
APPENDIX L
LISTING OF FEDERAL SHORT TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
GRAMS PER MILE p!!?
YR MAKE MODL CID TEST TYPE HC CO C02 NOXC ECON
001 75 CHEV TRUC 350 SHORT TEST 3.68 54.7 412.7 1 00 174
REPLICATE 3.13 49.1 422.8 Ko? 17*
AFTER MTCE. SHORT TEST N/A
REPLICATE N/A
002 75 CHEV TRUC 350 SHORT TEST 2.87 66.9 463.0 1.59 15 i,
REPLICATE 2.98 68.7 470.7 1.50 15']
AFTER MTCE. SHORT TEST N/A
REPLICATE N/A
003 75 CHEV TRUC 350 SHORT TEST 1.72 22.8 555.3 1.00 11.9
REPLICATE 1.48 13.7 537.0 1.21 15.8
AFTER MTCE. SHORT TEST N/A
REPLICATE N/A
004 75 CHEV TRUC 350 SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE. SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
005 75 DODG TRUC 318 SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE. SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
006 75 FORD TRUC 302 SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE. SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
007 75 FORD TRUC 302 SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE. SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
008 75 FORD TRUC 35T SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE. SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
009 75 FORD TRUC 351 SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE. SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
0
0
N
N
2
1
N
N
0
0
N
N
.31
.53
/A
/A
.60
.88
/A
/A
.62
.93
/A
/A
0
3
27
26
7
10
.0
.0
.8
.2
.4
.4
489
513
509
513
521
527
.8
.7
.6
.1
.2
.5
1
1
3
3
0
0
.50 18.1
.32 17.1
.16 15.8
.311 15.8
.63 16,6
.59 1^2
0.63 5.0 446.6 0.75 J9-
0.54 2.2 449.1 0.79 U
N/A
N/A
2
1
N
N
2
2
N
N
.0
.8
/A
/A
.0
.1
/A
/A
3
0
6
7
1
1
3
2
2
1
0
7
.6
.3
.2
-9
523
516
471
492
.4
.9
.6
.6
1
1
1
1
.71 T0<
.64 "•'
in I6-5
.'62 I6'3
L-2
-------
APPENDIX L.CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL SHORT TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO.
010
V 1 v
on
012
013
014
015
OT6
017
018
YR MAKE MODL CID
75 CMC TRUC 350
AFTER MTCE.
75 AMMO HORN 258
AFTER MTCE.
75 BUIC CNTY 350
AFTER MTCE.
75 BUIC RIVI 455
AFTER MTCE.
75 BUIC REGA 350
AFTER MTCE.
75 CADI ELDO 500
AFTER MTCE.
75 CHEV VEGA 140
AFTER MTCE.
75 CHEV NOVA 250
AFTER MTCE.
75 CHEV MONT 350
•
AFTER MTCE.
TEST TYPE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
1
0
N
N
T
T
7
7
0
0
0
0
3
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
4
4
3
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
T
0^
0
0
_(
HC
.54
.66
/A
/A
.37
.36
.17
.08
.84
.56
.83
.88
.38
.60
.35
.48
.78
.06
.40
.33
.98
.87
.00
.90
.25
.96
.59
.57
.84
. 77
.72
.76
.77
.84
.74
.65
3RAMS PER MILE
CO C02
7
0
11
9
8
6
15
73
79
78
75
39
73
89
45
42
29
32
703
709
70
76
77
72
73
8
5
0
0
0
27
20
76
73
.8
.7
.0
.7
.1
.5
.2
.1
.1
.7
.5
.4
.9
.2
.4
.7
.3
.2
.8
.9
.8
.2
.0
.4
.5
.9
.8
.4
.2
.6
.5
.8
.8
.8
505
519
364
356
378
380
453
448
469
463
494
532
486
475
447
442
462
448
521
491
554
548
272
283
377
376
470
474
392
393
457
438
454
463
.2
.8
.8
.4
.3
.0
.0
.9
.2
.5
.4
.3
.2
.6
.2
.9
.9
.7
.0
.2
.3
.8
. 7
.0
.0
.9
.0
.3
.7
.3
.3
.5
.7
.4
NOXC
1
1
3
3
2
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
2
1
1
7
0
0
0
0
.28
.39
.75
.78
.44
.59
.62
.68
.57
.65
.77
.88
.56
.63
.65
.67
.36
.40
.08
.93
.77
.74
.56
.30
.50
.78
.05
.67
.85
.69
.93
.84
.97
.96
MPG
FUEL
ECON
T7.0
17.0
23.0
23.6
22.5
22.5
18.5
18.8
17.7
17.9
14.2
14.7
14.6
14.2
16.9
17.2
17.3
17.6
12.7
13.7
73.7
73.7
29.3
29.7
26.6
26.7
21 .0
21.4
22.6
22.5
18.2
18.7
18.4
18.2
L-3
-------
APPENDIX L.CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL SHORT TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVKR
VEH
NO .
019
020
021
022
023
024
025
026
027
YR MAKE MODL CID
75 CHEV CAPR 350
AFTER MTCE.
75 CHEV IMPA 350
AFTER MTCE.
75 CHEV STAW 400
AFTER MTCE.
75 CHRY NEWP 400
AFTER MTCE.
75 DODG CORO 318
AFTER MTCE.
75 DODG DART 225
AFTER MTCE.
75 FORD MUST 140
AFTER MTCE.
75 FORD TORI 351
AFTER MTCE.
75 FORD GRAN 250
AFTER MTCE.
TEST TYPE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
2
0
1
2
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
---G
UC
.82
.82
.69
.88
.49
.08
.60
.65
.75
.71
.68
.66
.65
.56
.84
.68
.22
.08
.71
.09
.70
.45
.68
.76
.51
.52
.49
.49
.35
.22
.04
.02
.31
.37
.32
.32
RAM:
Cl
83
76
39
43
51
31
14
21
47
5
3
2
3
3
30
27
25
23
1
3
40
32
9
10
6
4
5
6
40
18
19
13
0
1
0
0
3 P
D
.9
.3
.1
.7
.3
.8
.8
.8
.7
.0
.6
.2
.7
.4
.6
.3
.3
.1
.9
.5
.1
.2
.1
.8
.1
.8
.4
.0
.9
.4
.8
.7
.7
.1
.9
.7
ER M
CO;
440
450
490
490
468
499
536
536
575
663
690
695
592
588
655
654
447
450
459
460
291
290
363
354
350
347
343
333
509
509
522
538
447
442
445
439
ILE
2
.3
.9
.8
.8
.3
.7
.3
.4
.5
.8
.7
.2
.9
.6
.0
.2
.3
.7
.6
.7
.8
.2
.4
.5
.9
.9
.1
.6
.3
.0
.4
.8
.4
.5
.8
.2
N
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
1
2
1
0
0
3
3
3
3
2
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
1
2
t
oxc
.11
.53
.71
.73
.63
.68
.56
.53
.98
.11
.10
.25
.07
.99
.91
.81
.93
.61
.50
.18
.03
.95
.98
.98
.91
.17
.77
__ /\
.78
.81
.18
.73
0 O
.12
.19
rf.
.0°
' 16
. «°
HPG
FUEL
ECON
15 1
* * J
15.3
^ * j
15.9
15.?
16.0
16.0
15.8
15.5
13.5
13.2
12.?
12.?
11.8
11.9
12.6
12.?
18.0
18.0
19.1
18.9
21.1
25.5
y.1 )l
23.1
*. i 7
23-7
21.5
iii fl
24.7
OC 1
25.'
25,8
16J
| V •
15.9
15.7
1 J '
19.7
19-5
19.8
20.1
L-A
-------
APPENDIX L.CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL SHORT TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO. YR
028 75
029 75
030 75
031 75
032 75
033 75
031 75
035 75
036 75
MAKE MODL CID
FORD LTD 357
AFTER MTCE.
FORD LTD 400
AFTER MTCE.
MERC MARQ 400
AFTER MTCE.
MERC MONG 351
AFTER MTCE.
OLDS DELT 350
AFTER MTCE.
OLDS CUTL 350
AFTER MTCE.
OLDS DELT 455
AFTER MTCE.
PLYM FURY 3T8
AFTER MTCE.
PLYM DUST 225
-*
A n •*•
ApTER MTCE.
TEST TYPE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
t
7
7
7
0
0
0
0
2
2
0
0
T
7
0
0
2
2
7
0
7
0
7
7
0
0
0
0
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
HC
.40
.39
.37
.47
.84
.75
.82
.79
.38
.77
.67
.73
.78
.53
.73
.75
.80
.69
.26
.98
.53
.88
.06
.70
.73
.53
.64
.83
.50
.07
.77
.05
.72
.73
.24
.50
'RAMS PER MILE
CO C02
79
23
79
74
27
35
25
27
53
47
22
27
26
20
24
24
45
47
38
35
26
76
23
20
70
9
77
78
20
8
9
6
76
79
24
30
.7
.7
.2
.3
.2
.7
.8
.8
.2
.3
.5
.7
.7
.6
.7
.4
.6
.9
.0
.7
.9
.0
.0
.6
.4
.0
.8
.9
.5
.6
.2
.4
.7
.9
.2
.7
558
563
559
566
580
608
594
588
560
587
643
646
508
497
606
608
425
432
430
454
479
437
437
440
480
484
478
466
457
463
470
460
378
333
320
378
.2
. T
.3
.0
.0
.8
.2
.9
.9
.4
.3
.2
.3
.4
.4
.6
.5
.7
.9
.5
.4
.0
.9
.2
.7
.5
.5
.6
.8
.4
.2
.6
.5
.2
.4
.7
NOXC
7
T
7
T
0
0
0
7
7
7
7
7
0
7
0
0
7
7
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
2
2
2
7
7
7
7
.44
.56
.53
.72
.97
.74
.94
.77
.03
.06
.54
.66
.98
.09
.89
.96
.08
.00
.78
.70
.46
.43
.58
.57
.89
.88
.68
.78
.32
.28
.57
.67
.76
.24
.50
.50
MPG
FUEL
ECON
75.0
74.7
75.0
75.0
14.2
13.3
13.9
14.2
13.6
13.4
13.0
13.0
76.7
76.6
73.7
73.7
17.5
17.5
17.9
17.3
19.0
19.1
18.8
18.6
17.8
17.7
17.8
17.8
78.2
78.5
78.2
78.7
25.5
24.7
24.5
23.9
L-5
-------
APPENDIX L.CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL SHORT TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO.
037
038
039
040
041
042
043
044
045
YR MAKE MODL CID
75 PONT CATA 400
AFTER MTCE.
75 PONT LEMA 350
AFTER MTCE.
75 PONT GRNV 455
AFTER MTCE.
76 CAPR SEDA 140
AFTER MTCE.
75 DATS B210 85
AFTER MTCE.
75 BOND SEDA 91
AFTER MTCE.
75 TOYO CORO 133
AFTER MTCE.
75 VOLK SEDA 97
AFTER MTCE.
75 VOLK STAW 90
AFTER MTCE.
TEST TYPE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
]
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
2
2
0
0
1
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
0
1
1
2
2
1
1
0
0
0
0
G
HC
.41
.39
.36
.34
.12
.69
.66
.55
.85
.62
.04
.42
.48
.57
.00
.44
.59
.59
.52
.47
.29
.25
.21
.21
.87
.95
.18
.18
.24
.17
.88
.75
.61
.68
.54
.55
RAM;
Ci
4
4
5
5
11
14
10
9
25
10
16
18
2
4
8
4
18
16
20
21
34
34
32
32
31
31
17
17
29
28
17
16
4
4
5
6
S P
0
.0
.0
.1
.5
.4
.7
.3
.3
.5
.5
.9
.9
.0
.1
.0
.2
.1
.8
.9
.2
.3
.7
.1
.5
.2
.8
.8
.7
.9
.2
.7
.8
.8
.9
.8
.0
ER M
CO
514
509
538
542
476
479
475
483
567
601
592
588
385
378
342
350
235
234
227
235
217
227
229
235
327
309
324
316
229
235
238
238
327
328
320
313
ILE
2
.9
.6
.9
.8
.9
.6
.5
.8
.5
.2
.4
.1
.9
.9
.5
.9
.2
.5
.4
.4
.4
.3
.7
.4
.7
.6
.4
.9
.5
.6
.6
.3
.4
.7
.9
.5
N
T
1
2
2
0
0
2
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
2
T
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
T
T
2
2
2
2
T
T
oxc
.83
.82
.23
.32
.81
.69
.20
.32
.51
.72
.63
.67
.69
.64
.77
.72
.03
.20
.74
.77
.78
.83
.63
.64
.84
.89
.57
.62
.to
*t
. To
.03
A A
.00
.35
OC
.25
D7
." '
.
HPG
FUEL
ECON
"* — ^ • •
n o
' 1 V
17 2
i » t
H.2
16.1
17.8
17.6
18.0
17.?
U.5
11.3
11,2
11.2
22.?
22.5
21.8
21,7
33.0
33,»
33.5
32.5
32.2
31.1
31.2
MA L
30.6
23.1
on <;
21«'
oil Q
-------
APPENDIX L.CONT'D
IISTING OF FEDERAL SHORT TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
| INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO. YR
231 75
*• j
232 75
233 75
231 75
235 75
236 75
238 75
2HO 75
21)4 ?5
MAKE MODL CID
AMMO GREM 232
AFTER MTCE.
AMMO HORN 304
AFTER MTCE.
AMMO MATA 360
AFTER MTCE.
BUIC SKYH 237
AFTER MTCE.
BUIC SKYL 260
AFTER MTCE.
BUIC REGA 350
AFTER MTCE.
BUIC STAW 350
AFTER MTCE.
BUIC RIVI 455
AFTER MTCE.
CHEV VEGA 740
AFTER MTCE.
TEST TYPE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
7
7
7
7
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
2
7
7
7
7
7
0
2
2
7
2
3
3
7
7
2
2
7
7
HC
.58
.65
.42
.40
.75
.78
.87
.95
.45
.48
.62
.57
.55
.75
.47
.37
.42
.05
.08
.75
.72
.78
.03
.56
.42
.58
.99
.25
.77
.74
.89
.89
.22
.34
.54
.73
3RAMS PER MILE
CO C02
27
22
27
23
3
3
2
3
0
7
0
0
8
72
4
4
45
30
74
77
50
57
26
72
77
89
56
74
757
774
40
39
43
40
24
22
.6
.9
.2
.8
.4
.8
.8
.7
.6
.0
.5
.7
.9
.9
.7
.4
.5
.6
.0
.0
.2
.9
.6
.5
.3
.6
.6
.7
.0
.9
.0
.3
.0
.4
.7
.2
328
327
377
369
486
482
456
450
466
455
456
443
345
345
353
340
355
364
395
394
436
436
475
500
442
475
468
448
450
457
542
544
272
280
266
268
.4
.2
.4
.0
.9
.5
.5
.5
.3
.0
.6
.7
.0
.7
.7
.6
.4
.2
.3
.9
.9
.5
.7
.4
.4
.5
.7
.7
.5
.0
.4
.6
.2
.6
.6
.7
NOXC
7
T
7
7
2
2
7
7
5
5
5
5
7
7
2
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
7
7
7
7
.97
.77
.78
.72
.07
.04
.67
.90
.59
.49
.20
.76
.56
.53
.27
.08
.80
.83
.80
.73
.52
.48
.60
.59
.47
.40
.52
.49
.42
.47
.78
.79
.29
.36
.23
.04
MPG
FUEL
ECON
24.2
24.5
21.4
27.6
77.9
78.1
19.1
19.4
18.9
19.4
19.3
19.9
24.6
24. 1
24.5
25.4
20.4
21.2
21. 1
20.9
17.0
16.6
17.1
17.0
15.8
15.7
15.7
15.5
72.5
73.8
74.5
74.5
25.6
25.3
28.7
28.8
L-7
-------
APPENDIX L.CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL SHORT TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO.
245
246
247
248
249
250
252
253
258
YR MAKE MODL CID
75 CHEV MONZ 140
AFTER MTCE.
75 CHEV MONZ 262
AFTER MTCE.
75 CHEV NOVA 250
AFTER MTCE.
75 CHEV NOVA 262
AFTER MTCE.
75 CHEV CAMA 350
AFTER MTCE.
75 CHEV NOVA 350
AFTER MTCE.
75 CHEV MALI 350
AFTER MTCE.
75 CHEV MALI 350
AFTER MTCE.
75 CHEV CAPR 350
AFTER MTCE.
TEST TYPE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
1
1
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
2
2
1
1
G
HC
.82
.76
.99
.70
.33
.33
.39
.58
.19
.21
.19
.26
.21
.90
.38
.44
.72
.56
.29
.30
.89
.90
.62
.44
.82
.34
.04
.16
.05
.99
.75
.65
.04
.28
.09
.06
RAM;
Ci
36
34
13
10
1
4
0
3
2
1
2
2
6
2
1
0
57
50
40
37
84
82
38
35
44
35
29
31
16
16
12
10
47
52
27
27
S P
0
.5
.2
.7
.2
.9
.5
.4
.2
.1
.4
.9
.1
.4
.5
.1
.1
.5
.7
.1
.5
.3
.9
.2
.8
.2
.2
.8
.7
.2
.1
.7
.7
.6
.1
.8
.8
ER M
CO
292
298
303
307
427
432
409
410
392
394
392
407
416
420
458
463
395
419
426
425
419
415
454
455
451
452
447
446
449
456
485
483
486
465
520
515
ILE
2
.8
.7
.2
.4
.8
.7
.0
.9
.8
.9
.1
.7
.0
.6
.6
.3
.8
.4
.5
.0
.3
.6
.9
.3
.7
.9
.6
.6
.8
.7
.0
.9
.3
.4
.7
.2
N
0
0
0
0
7
1
T
1
2
2
1
1
T
T
T
T
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
oxc
.63
.65
.58
.53
.13
.01
.87
.92
.62
.79
.80
.73
.61
.78
.07
.13
.74
.86
.83
.88
.66
.78
.64
.62
.71
f
.36
.39
h C
.45
/* f\
.39
Ii A
.40
.62
ad
.50
' oil
.I1*
uru
FUEL
ECON
21 Q
1 i 7
21.8
27.1
27.3
20.6
20.1
21.6
21.2
22.1
22.3
22.3
21.6
20.6
20.8
19.2
19.1
18.1
17,6
18.0
18.2
15.8
A f rt
16.0
17.1
nrt
.2
16.9
no
.J
17 8
11 •"
17 7
11 >'
18.5
18 3
| V i J
17,5
1 1 • '
17.7
1 I '
16.0
15>
L-8
-------
APPENDIX L.CONT'D
ITSTING OF FEDERAL. SHORT TF.ST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON'INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO. YR
260 75
26T 75
262 75
263 75
264 75
266 75
267 75
268 75
270 75
MAKE MODL CID
CHEV IMPA 350
AFTER MTCE.
CHEV IMPA 350
AFTER MTCE.
CHEV IMPA 350
AFTER MTCE.
CHEV CAPR 400
AFTER MTCE.
CHEV IMPA 400
AFTER MTCE.
CHEV CAPR 454
AFTER MTCE.
CHRY CORD 360
AFTER MTCE.
CHRY IMPE 440
AFTER MTCE.
DODG DART 3T8
.«
AFTER MTCE.
TEST TYPE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
n
HC
T.
T.
T.
0.
2.
2.
0.
0.
2.
2.
7.
T.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
2.
2.
1.
T.
2.
9.
0.
0.
T.
T.
T.
0.
79
92
03
92
53
53
94
89
86
87
30
33
41
29
25
26
43
67
70
56
33
28
24
36
22
25
47
51
02
65
62
60
92
44
72
82
RAMS PER MILE
CO C02
48
48
19
15
60
60
24
27
56
55
42
41
6
7
0
0
7
2
7
3
0
0
7
6
46
50
27
28
57
39
75
75
74
9
8
6
.9
.9
.4
.4
.0
.7
.6
.2
.1
.7
.7
.8
.2
.7
.7
.3
.7
.5
.7
.7
.9
.8
.5
.2
.7
.4
.6
.5
.7
.9
.7
.6
.8
.5
.0
.3
530
530
573
524
444
439
509
576
435
440
488
475
520
529
555
553
623
609
567
595
642
645
660
654
465
457
483
488
561
605
632
637
435
440
456
461
.9
.8
. 1
.1
.9
.7
.7
.0
.9
.0
.7
.9
.4
.6
.3
.7
.3
.7
.2
.5
.8
.2
.6
.2
.9
.8
.7
.3
.9
.0
.5
.4
.7
.4
.7
.0
i
NOXC
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
T
0
0
T
T
T
T
7
T
T
T
T
T
T
0
2
2
3
3
2
2
7
T
T
T
T
T
.72
.76
.70
.73
.75
.77
.74
.76
.98
.11
.54
.52
.48
.59
.87
.96
.T3
.06
.19
.32
.T9
.18
.03
.98
.67
.73
.09
.03
.55
.16
.16
.15
.95
.85
.83
.63
MPG
FUEL
ECON
14.5
14.5
16. 2
16.1
16.2
16.3
16.1
15.8
16.6
16.5
15.9
16.3
16.7
16.6
16.0
16.0
14.1
14.4
15.3
14.7
13.8
13.7
13.4
13.3
16.3
16.3
16.7
16.5
13.7
12.7
13.5
13.4
19.7
19.3
18.8
78.7
L-9
-------
APPENDIX L.CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL SHORT TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO.
272
273
275
277
281
282
284
285
286
YR MAKE MODL CID
75 DODG CHAR 360
AFTER MTCE.
75 DODG MONA 400
AFTER MTCE.
75 FORD MUST 140
AFTER MTCE.
75 FORD MUST 777
AFTER MTCE.
75 FORD GRAN 302
AFTER MTCE.
75 FORD STAW 357
AFTER MTCE.
75 FORD TORI 400
AFTER MTCE.
75 FORD LTD 357
AFTER MTCE.
75 FORD ELIT 357
AFTER MTCE.
TEST TYPE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT -TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
GRAMS PER MILE
HC CO C02 NOXC
2
2
2
2
4
4
0
0
7
1
0
0
0
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
0
0
7
0
0
0
0
0
2
2
2
7
' 2
2
0
0
.98
.86
.76
.04
.07
.78
.92
.65
.77
.27
.62
.62
.80
.05
.70
.77
.79
.84
.05
.72
.87
.82
.00
.88
.83
.82
.66
.67
.57
.87
.70
.55
.26
.26
.74
.87
58
56
35
34
706
707
78
74
77
72
77
70
8
77
71
12
15
16
1
2
28
28
26
35
16
18
18
16
42
51
63
38
56
55
15
18
.8
.2
.2
.9
.1
.9
.6
.1
.7
.2
.2
.5
.3
.4
.6
.0
.7
.3
.8
.4
.0
.7
.7
.2
.7
.8
.6
.5
.2
.2
.7
.5
.9
.7
.6
.2
437
431
483
482
519
517
617
626
317
309
350
351
395
397
417
422
513
519
476
483
616
614
608
606
607
586
664
670
518
523
544
582
498
499
612
608
.3
.3
.3
.9
.8
.9
.3
.4
.0
.0
.9
.9
.6
.8
.7
.8
.4
.8
.7
.9
.8
.0
.4
.1
.7
.6
.4
.5
.2
.3
.9
.9
.3
.2
.3
.2
2
2
2
T
7
t
1
1
1
T
T
1
T
1
0
0
t
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
7
7
1
T
1
0
0
0
7
7
.16
.07
.16
.51
.38
.48
.49
M
.85
.93
.17
.49
.47
J6
.95
.96
.97
.85
.65
.70
.82
.78
.86
.66
.65
.70
.02
.07
.00
ft rt
.79
O 1
.82
.03
nfi
,uo
nfi
.10
90
.3?
nr\j
FUEL
ECON
16 S
1 u . j
16.8
16 3
v • J
16.3
12.7
12.?
13.7
13.6
26.2
26.7
211.0
24. 0
21.6
21.2
20.2
19.9
16.3
16.1
18J
18.1
13.1
13.1
/
13.6
_ ii
13.1
14.0
t li 0
14. J
to fi
12,1
to 7
12.1
15.0
14.5
13 6
i j.
13.7
1 J '
14,9
14.9
13-9
13-9
L-10
-------
ON
APPENDIX L.CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL SHORT TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO. YR
287 75
u v 1 '
288 75
289 75
290 75
293 75
294 75
295 75
297 75
298 75
MAKE MODL CID
FORD LTD 357
AFTER MTCE.
FORD TORI 35T
AFTER MTCE.
FORD LTD 400
AFTER MTCE.
FORD LTD 400
AFTER MTCE.
FORD LTD 460
AFTER MTCE.
LINC CONT 460
AFTER MTCE.
MERC MONA 302
AFTER MTCE.
MERC MONT 35T
AFTER MTCE.
MERC COUG 35T
*
AFTER MTCE.
TEST TYPE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST'
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
0
0
0
0
4
4
2
2
9
9
T
T
T
T
0
0
2
T
T
T
0
0
t
T
0
T
0
0
0
0
0
0
T
f
T
T
_r
HC
.79
.86
.7T
.69
.69
.68
.75
.26
.74
.76
.06
.05
.32
.28
.48
.49
.05
.99
.36
.36
.88
.83
.TT
.T4
.56
.T3
.73
.72
.98
.9T
-90
.9T
.39
.40
.T6
.26
3RAMS PER MILE
CO C02
27
24
27
20
T09
708
47
57
254
256
33
36
29
33
35
39
46
43
T5
T9
3T
33
23
2T
to
2T
5
6
24
24
T6
T7
30
33
T5
TT
.3
.0
.3
.6
.4
.8
.6
.6
.4
.0
.T
.5
.4
.4
.3
.5
.8
.9
.4
.6
.5
.T
.T
.9
.5
.8
.7
.2
.T
.2
.8
.2
.8
.5
.6
.T
578
582
6T3
606
476
469
563
547
499
495
683
699
636
630
82T
82T
623
624
60T
60T
690
689
670
674
509
502
502
485
544
55T
565
567
532
540
650
642
.8
.2
.6
.7
.6
.4
.T
.2
.8
.7
.4
.5
.T
.7
.3
.7
.9
.3
.5
.2
'.9
.0
.6
.T
.8
.5
.9
.9
.9
.8
.6
.6
.3
.6
.6
.4
NOXC
t
7
7
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
7
T
T
T
0
0
T
7
0
0
0
0
0
0
T
T
T
T
T
T
.73
.08
.00
.96
.82
.80
.85
.94
.49
.46
.62
.55
.87
.85
.73
.73
.78
.25
.47
.37
.85
.85
.06
.04
.47
.55
.79
.72
.88
.96
.57
.59
.55
.50
.64
.70
MPG
FUEL
ECON
74.4
T4.3
73.7
73.8
73.4
73.5
73.8
73.8
9.5
9.6
72.0
77.7
72.9
72.9
70.7
70.0
72.6
72.7
74.7
73.9
77.9
77.9
72.5
72.5
76.8
76.4
77.3
77.8
75.7
75.0
T4.9
T4.9
75.2
74.9
T3.T
T3.4
L-ll
-------
APPENDIX L.CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL SHORT TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO.
300
303
30?
308
309
310
3T1
312
3t3
YR MAKE MODL CID
75 OLDS OMEG 260
AFTER MTCE.
75 OLDS STAW 350
AFTER MTCE.
75 PLYM DUST 225
AFTER MTCE.
75 PLYM SCAM 3T8
AFTER MTCE.
75 PLYM VALI 3T8
AFTER MTCE.
75 PLYM FURY 318
AFTER MTCE.
75 PLYM FURY 360
AFTER MTCE.
75 PLYM FURY 400
AFTER MTCE.
75 PLYM FURY 360
AFTER MTCE.
TEST TYPE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
%
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
GRAMS
HC CO
t
T
T
T
3
4
t
T
T
T
0
0
T
T
T
7
3
3
0
T
3
3
T
T
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
T
2
0
0
.33
.45
.2T
.22
.18
.38
.04
.OT
.87
.88
.75
.7T
.55
.54
.T2
.31
.04
.T4
.8T
.53
.76
.78
.45
.T9
.47
.47
.07
.02
.54
.54
.06
.26
.97
.23
.65
.66
28.
30.
35.
24.
37.
45.
2T.
25.
36.
36.
T4.
T5.
20.
20.
T3.
T6.
75.
9t.
T2.
2T.
56.
54.
T9.
T4.
53.
50.
47.
4t.
46.
47.
50.
52.
3T.
36.
T3.
13.
P
9
6
5
T
3
7
T
3
8
3
8
6
8
9
3
8
5
2
0
8
T
5
2
4
7
7
6
7
2
T
5
5
5
7
3
8
ER MI
C02
438.
435.
400.
4Tt.
425.
395.
47 1.
463.
3T8.
3T9.
350.
353.
453.
457.
479.
480.
393.
38T.
446.
434.
3961.
400.
458.
477.
449.
435.
476.
476.
500.
50T.
524.
5T8.
458.
46T.
5T5.
52T.
LE
5
6
6
2
6
3
0
7
T
7
8
8
2
9
0
7
2
3
9
2
6
4
9
6
4
3
3
7
0
3
3
5
2
5
T
6
NOXC
T
T
0
0
0
0
0
0
T
T
T
T
T
T
0
0
T
T
0
T
T
T
T
T
T
f
T
T
T
T
T
T
2
2
T
t
.09
.T9
.83
.88
.88
.77
.57
.67
.91
.97
.17
.01
.21
.13
.67
.78
.44
.43
.79
.42
.25
.14
.13
.06
.82
.80
.29
.43
.86
.79
A «7
.27
/\ C
.25
.05
n A
.00
* f
.H
1 Q
.1?
MPG
FUEL
ECOH
18 2
' w 1 1
18 2
v 1 U
19.3
' * j
19,6
18.0
18.5
17.5
17.5
23,2
23.2
23.6
23.3
18.1
17.9
17.6
17.1
17.0
16.6
18.9
18.8
77,9
_ A
17.8
18.0
. - /
17.6
76.*
nfl
.u
«e Q
15.'
tfi 2
10. '
15.2
1"5 I
I3>
11.5
1 ~i i '
14.5
1 ~ ' '
T7J
76.9
16.5
16.3
L-12
-------
ON
APPENDIX L.CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL SHORT TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO. YF
314 75
3T6 75
318 75
320 75
32T 75
322 75
323 76
325 75
326 75
MAKE MODL CID
PONT ASTR T40
AFTER MTCE.
PONT LEMA 350
AFTER MTCE.
PONT LEMA 350
AFTER MTCE.
PONT STAW 400
AFTER MTCE.
PONT GRNV 455
AFTER MTCE.
AUDI FOX 97
AFTER MTCE.
CAPR GHIA T7T
AFTER MTCE.
COLT SEDA 98
AFTER MTCE.
°ATS 7TO TT9
*
AFTER MTCE.
TEST TYPE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
r.
HC
2.
2.
0.
T.
T.
2.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
T.
T.
T.
T.
0.
0.
0.
0.
T.
T .
' T.
T.
T.
f.
2.
2.
24
24
78
T6
83
03
86
6T
33
37
86
68
45
45
58
53
4T
39
43
42
07
TT
29
35
50
44
52
89
60
93
57
62
58
56
26
27
;RAMS PER MILE
CO C02
66
66
T6
27
45
52
T5
72
2
T
2
2
T4
TO
22
T6
9
9
TT
TT
3
4
2
2
3
3
2
8
29
28
22
23
3T
3T
27
30
.4
.8
.7
.7
.2
.6
.0
.5
.9
.5
.4
.2
.3
.3
.2
.6
.6
.7
.T
.8
.7
.4
.7
.6
.T
.4
.5
.8
.7
.3
.7
.2
.2
.T
.4
.3
266
26T
324
297
465
462
493
487
482
479
454
454
546
553
548
548
595
595
628
627
298
293
329
32T
453
448
438
43T
338
34T
340
330
279
279
274
276
.5
.2
.3
.T
.6
.7
.9
.9
.7
.6
.2
.0
.5
.6
.6
.5
.0
.8
.9
.3
.9
.3
.9
.8
.0
.9
.4
.6
.9
.T
.7
.2
.7
.5
.7
.7
NOXC
0
0
0
0
T
T
0
0
4
3
4
4
T
T
T
T
0
0
T
T
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
T
T
T
0
.47
.45
.38
.34
.26
.33
.95
.93
.T5
.88
.23
.T4
.80
.75
.T8
.T4
.95
.98
.09
.00
.74
.76
.87
.87
.6T
.53
.7T
.82
.76
.77
.9T
.93
.45
.38
.OT
.98
MPG
FUEL
ECON
23.5
23.8
25. T
25.8
T6.4
T6.T
T7.T
T7.4
T8.2
T8.4
T9.3
T9.3
T5.6
T5.5
T5.2
T5.4
T4.5
T4.5
T3.7
T3.7
28.8
29.2
26.2
26.9
T9.3
T9.5
20.0
T9.8
22.7
22.7
23.3
23.9
26.6
26.6
27.3
26.8
L-13
-------
APPENDIX L.CONT'D
i
LISTING OF FEDERAL SHORT TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO.
327
328
329
330
33t
332
333
335
336
YR MAKE MODL CID
75 DATS B2TO 85
AFTER MTCE.
75 DATS SEDA TT9
AFTER MTCE.
75 FIAT STAW 78
AFTER MTCE.
75 FIAT Xt-9 79
AFTER MTCE.
75 HOND CVCC 9T
AFTER MTCE.
75 MAZD RX3 70
AFTER MTCE.
75 MAZD RX3 70
AFTER MTCE.
75 MG MGB tTO
AFTER MTCE.
75 OPEL STAW TT6
AFTER MTCE.
TEST TYPE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
GRAMS
HC CO
T
T
t
T
T
T
T
t
T
T
0
0
0
0
0
0
T
T
N
.43
.50
.4T
.33
.49
.47
.38
.58
.T7
.29
.66
.68
.29
.37
.43
.49
.T7
.T5
/A
t6.
T3.
t6.
T5.
25.
24.
27.
26.
22.
24.
TT.
t3.
5.
6.
7.
TT.
8.
8.
PER MI
C02
8
9
5
0
2
4
3
8
5
7
0
6
6
5
5
3
6
9
243.
246.
24T.
25T.
278.
28T.
292.
294.
272.
269.
328.
324.
3T8.
3T2.
3TT.
3T5.
236.
227.
LE
NOXC
9
7
9
3
3
8
8
8
4
3
8
9
6
8
9
6
7
4
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
3
3
0
0
T
t
1
T
I
T
.05
.T4
.06
.T8
.76
.85
.18
.25
.73
.59
.82
.75
.71
.87
.8t
.92
.20
.08
MPG
FUEL
ECON
32 1
•"• > j
32 5
•* u i J
32.6
31.8
27.5
27.3
26. t
26.0
28.5
28.1
25.5
25,5
27.0
27. 1
27.3
26.5
31.9
36.2
N/A
0
0
T2
9
9
T
0
0
0
0
0
0
T
t
T
T
.23
.53
.63
.28
.98
.T2
.93
.88
.39
.52
.55
.65
.98
.84
.53
.68
4.
6.
6T.
29.
87.
TT.
8.
8.
TT.
TT.
T4.
T3.
34.
33.
2T.
22.
T
8
5
3
T
T
9
T
3
3
2
4
8
5
4
5
555.
544.
36T.
426.
579.
9T2.
506.
495.
375.
386.
387.
382.
326.
326.
344.
342.
5
2
4
T
4
7
8
5
6
3
0
8
6
4
4
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.40
.45
.16
.46
.42
.43
.56
.5T
.57
c 1
.57
— f
.56
r tj
.57
.98
nt
.01
t Q
. 1 '
on
.<•"
15.8
15.9
— a
17.8
. — a
17."
11.9
n f,
9.3
./ n
16.5
17 4
II.
22,5
21.9
C i ' *
51 6
1 1 lv
21.9
£• ' '
22.9
23.'
23-2
21.2
L-14
-------
ON
APPENDIX L.CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL SHORT TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO. YR
338 75
J J v
310 75
311 75
312 75
313 75
315 75
511 75
512 75
5'3 75
MAKE MODL CID
PORS 977S T64
AFTER MTCE.
TOYO CELI T33
AFTER MTCE.
TOYO CORO 97
AFTER MTCE.
VOLK SEDA 97
AFTER MTCE.
VOLK RABB 90
AFTER MTCE.
VOLV SEDA T2T
AFTER MTCE.
FORD GRAN 200
AFTER MTCE.
MERC MONA 250
AFTER MTCE.
°LDS OMEG 250
*
AFTER MTCE.
TEST TYPE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
T
T
0
0
2
2
T
T
t
T
T
T
2
2
2
2
t
2
2
2
T
T
T
T
0
0
0
7
0
0
0
0
0
6
0
0
HC
.97
.76
.75
.74
.T6
.32
.75
.54
.36
.54
.08
.04
.03
.04
.30
.T5
.92
.09
.5T
.7T
.3T
.27
.53
.40
.62
.62
.69
.00
.30
.33
.25
.27
.78
.69
.88
.72
RAMS P
CO
26
25
T6
T4
20
2T
T9
20
20
2T
T9
T8
T4
T3
T9
9
43
45
58
59
49
44
78
70
73
T5
7
9
4
6
3
3
5
6
8
8
.6
.6
.8
.8
.2
.0
.8
.7
.8
.9
.T
.8
.0
.9
.8
.6
.6
.4
.2
.9
.0
.3
.8
.6
.7
.T
.6
.5
.6
.7
.3
.9
.8
.9
.7
.6
ER MILE
C02
402
400
477
4TT
328
325
357
356
30T
303
298
299
244
246
257
264
229
228
206
203
339
346
4T2
425
434
440
392
40T
490
490
5t9
526
435
43T
38T
387
.5
.3
.9
.7
.9
.7
.T
.6
.2
.4
.7
.8
.0
.0
.3
.5
.5
.8
.9
.6
.1
.8
.6
.9
.T
.4
.5
.3
.4
.5
.8
.5
.5
.3
.3
.7
NOXC
T
T
0
t
T
T
2
2
T
2
T
T
T
T
T
T
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
T
T
T
t
2
2
T
T
.24
.T5
.99
.OT
.60
.66
.07
.09
.93
.03
.56
.75
.32
.43
.45
.35
.59
.53
.44
.42
.57
.67
.32
.34
.58
.54
.50
.56
.49
.42
.32
.45
.44
.48
.62
.50
MPG
FUEL
ECON
T9.7
T9.9
20.7
20.3
24.2
24.2
22.5
22.5
26.2
25.9
26.7
26.7
32.6
32.4
30.0
37.0
29.2
28.9
29.0
29.0
27.1
27.7
76.4
76.4
79-4
79.0
27.8
27.2
77.8
77.7
76.9
76.6
79.9
20.0
22.3
22.0
L-15
-------
APPENDIX L.CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL SHORT TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VC" U
t, n
NO.
5T4
5T5
5T6
5T7
578
5T9
520
521
522
YR MAKE MODL CID
75 PLYM GRNF 400
AFTER MTCE.
75 PONT VENT 250
AFTER MTCE.
75 BMW SEDA T2t
AFTER MTCE.
75 BMW 5301 T82
AFTER MTCE.
75 SUBA STAW 83
AFTER MTCE.
75 MERB 450S 276
AFTER MTCE.
75 PORS 9T4 T20
AFTER MTCE.
75 SAAB 99LE T2T
AFTER MTCE.
75 AMMO HORN 232
AFTER MTCE.
TEST TYPE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
1
4
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
N
N
4
0
N
N
2
2
2
2
T
T
T
t
T
0
N
N
2
2
N
N
T
T
T
T
_ - _n
HC
.06
.58
.56
.83
.29
.28
.32
.23
.25
.28
/A
/A
.22
.97
/A
/A
.06
.T3
.53
.3T
.TT
.T8
.09
.3T
.22
.97
/A
/A
.75
.84
/A
/A
.66
.65
.42
.52
RA M
-------
ON
APPENDIX L.CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL SHORT TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO.
•'""
521
525
531
535
536
538
51o
5M
YR
75
75
75
75
76
75
75
75
75
MAKE MODL CID
AMMO HORN 258
AFTER MTCE.
DODG MONA 440
AFTER MTCE.
MERC MARQ 460
AFTER MTCE.
AMMO GREM 232
AFTER MTCE.
AMMO HORN 232
AFTER MTCE.
AMMO PACE 258
AFTER MTCE.
AMMO HORN 232
AFTER MTCE.
AMMO PACE 258
AFTER MTCE.
fiUlC LESA 350
-•
AFTER MTCE.
TEST TYPE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
r.
HC
T.
T.
T.
1 .
2.
2.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
2.
2.
1 .
1 .
1.
1.
1 .
1 .
2.
2.
2.
2.
2.
1 .
1 .
1 .
1 .
1 .
1.
1 .
2.
2.
1.
1 .
76
69
55
58
70
58
28
30
88
84
82
75
53
50
74
81
54
47
63
59
52
39
31
21
28
39
17
09
71
71
81
58
53
72
25
63
RAMS PER MILE
CO C02
25
24
14
18
30
29
4
5
17
17
7
9
30
33
15
16
23
20
15
14
72
68
61
66
27
21
11
1 1
35
34
76
62
67
70
35
57
.4
.4
.T
.4
.1
.2
.2
.8
.5
.4
.9
.0
.5
.5
.0
.5
.7
.1
.3
.3
.8
.7
.0
.9
.3
.1
.9
.6
.7
.1
.2
.2
.9
.8
.9
.5
427
428
429
424
525
527
613
601
670
676
674
684
273
268
279
284
338
341
340
345
384
361
388
369
334
336
334
333
371
380
463
460
469
463
517
589
.0
.2
.1
.2
.7
.0
.5
.4
.2
.7
.4
.9
.5
.8
.1
.9
.3
.7
.0
.0
.1
.9
.1
.9
.8
.7
.8
.8
.9
.8
.6
.4
.3
.7
.4
.1
NOXC
2.04
T.9T
2.25
2.13
3.01
3.00
2.19
2.26
1.54
1.55
1.39
1 .42
2.12
1.92
1 .28
1.32
2.40
2.48
2.55
2.64
1 .22
1 .04
1.23
1 .02
1 .82
2.21
1 .91
1.90
1 .70
1 .78
1.03
1 .07
0.71
0.58
0.63
1 .09
MPG
FUEL
ECON
T8.8
T8.8
19.5
19.4
15.3
15.3
14.3
14.5
12.7
12.6
12.9
12.7
26.9
26.9
28.8
28.0
23.3
23.5
24.0
23.8
17.5
18.6
18.1
18.4
23.1
23.7
24.8
25.0
20.5
20.2
15.1
15.8
15.2
15.2
15.4
13.0
L-17
-------
APPENDIX L.CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL SHORT TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO.
547
549
550
551
553
554
559
560
565
YR MAKE MODL CID
75 BUIC REGA 350
AFTER MTCE.
75 BUIC LESA 350
AFTER MTCE.
75 BUIC LESA 350
AFTER MTCE.
75 BUIC LESA 455
AFTER MTCE.
75 BUIC RIVI 455
AFTER MTCE.
75 BUIC STAW 455
AFTER MTCE.
75 CADI ELDO 500
AFTER MTCE.
75 CADI DEVI 500
AFTER MTCE.
75 CHEV VEGA 140
AFTER MTCE.
TEST TYPE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
GRAMS P
HC CO
2
2
1
1
1
2
0
0
3
3
2
1
3
3
2
2
3
3
1
1
3
3
2
2
4
4
2
2
3
3
2
2
3
3
1
1
.55
.41
.12
.07
.29
.00
.37
.37
.42
.07
.03
.96
.29
.42
.24
.08
.26
.12
.73
.84
.47
.44
.15
.56
.20
.60
.12
.07
.84
.86
.46
.03
.53
.48
.84
.63
56
57
19
16
27
30
12
12
103
92
44
46
69
68
54
51
87
81
31
29
79
66
46
48
87
102
41
40
66
63
59
53
65
60
24
24
.9
.4
.9
.8
.5
.9
.7
.9
.1
.2
.8
.3
.5
.1
.2
.6
.3
.7
.8
.6
.4
.4
.6
.8
.4
.7
.9
.3
.5
.8
.4
.9
.5
.7
.4
.2
ER MILE
C02 NOXC
466
444
495
474
532
500
583
596
446
443
508
505
496
485
523
537
546
538
579
575
548
557
596
623
502
489
534
554
477
482
520
532
261
242
307
296
.8
.5
.5
.1
.8
.5
.5
.7
.9
.1
.9
.3
.3
.4
.2
.6
.6
.7
.6
.4
.6
.9
.2
.7
.5
.1
.6
.4
.2
.0
.8
.3
.1
.5
.9
.4
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
1
1
1
1
1
0
.89
.86
.85
.85
.87
.73
.27
.24
.68
.64
.85
.93
.65
.67
.50
.51
.82
.74
.69
.82
.92
.96
.77
.93
.42
.20
.88
ft n
.87
.52
54
. 1
<"i C
.25
If
. 5
.00
01
.7 '
7
.9?
MPG
FUEL
ECON
15,7
••/if
16.1
16.7
17.6
15.3
16.0
11.7
11.1
11.3
11.8
15.2
15.2
11.1
11.7
11.1
11.2
12.8
13.1
11.0
11.1
13.0
* A
13.2
i /* 4
13.'
* A C
12.5
13-6
41 7
13- j
4 ll (\
(1.0
111 ?
1 T 1
11.9
11,9
i ' ' '
11,3
1 1 1 J
25."
25-2
26-1
L-18
-------
ON
APPENDIX L.CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL SHORT TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO. YR
567 75
568 75
569 75
570 75
571 75
580 75
581 75
582 75
583 75
MAKE MODL CID
CHEV VEGA 140
AFTER MTCE.
CHEV VEGA 140
AFTER MTCE.
CHEV VEGA 140
AFTER MTCE.
CHEV MONZ 140
AFTER MTCE.
CHEV VEGA 140
AFTER MTCE.
CHEV NOVA 350
AFTER MTCE.
CHEV NOVA 350
AFTER MTCE.
CHEV NOVA 350
AFTER MTCE.
CHEV NOVA 350
.#
AFTER MTCE.
TEST TYPE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
n
HC
1 .
2.
0.
0.
1 .
1 .
0.
0.
1 .
1 .
0.
0.
1 .
1 .
1 .
0.
3.
2.
3.
3.
2.
2.
0.
0.
2.
2.
1 .
1 .
1 .
1 .
0.
0.
3.
3.
2.
2.
97
01
45
34
97
68
53
44
38
26
42
31
87
94
37
89
15
97
96
70
76
67
75
69
95
92
65
46
69
79
93
88
68
97
35
39
RAMS PER MILE
CO C02
26
24
11
9
35
26
5
5
27
27
10
7
36
38
16
9
59
54
55
46
52
57
14
12
91
92
34
33
39
43
24
23
70
79
39
42
.4
.2
.5
.3
.2
.0
.6
.6
.9
.4
.1
.6
.8
.4
.5
.3
.3
.4
.5
.8
.4
.8
.5
.5
.9
.7
.8
.6
.4
.3
.7
.9
.0
.4
.8
.6
362
365
363
358
335
342
355
356
305
318
335
354
310
315
343
356
259
270
262
262
411
390
482
478
469
458
492
490
438
431
469
463
405
405
419
374
.8
.5
.5
.0
.9
.8
.3
.0
.8
.4
.9
.6
.1
.9
.7
.2
.2
.5
.2
.5
.2
.4
.8
.9
.5
.9
.9
.1
.8
.7
.6
.6
.2
.2
.0
.6
NOXC
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.72
.84
.68
.76
.63
.59
.56
.62
.53
.57
.60
.66
.63
.57
.34
.60
.65
.77
.66
.70
.85
.80
.44
.43
.12
.09
.64
.57
.69
.68
.56
.55
.65
.67
.52
.49
MPG
FUEL
ECON
21.6
21.7
23.2
23.8
22.3
22.8
24.3
24.2
25.1
24.3
25.1
24.2
23.7
23.2
23.7
23.8
24.5
24.3
24.5
25.5
17.7
18.1
17.5
17.7
14.2
14.5
16.1
16.2
17.5
17.6
17.4
17.6
16.8
16.4
18.1
19.8
L-19
-------
APPENDIX L.CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL SHORT TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO.
588
589
591
592
593
594
595
596
598
YR MAKE MODL CID
75 CHEV MONT 350
AFTER MTCE.
75 CHEV MALI 350
AFTER MTCE.
75 CHEV MONT 350
AFTER MTCE.
75 CHEV MONT 350
AFTER MTCE.
75 CHEV MALI 350
AFTER MTCE.
75 CHEV MONT 350
AFTER MTCE.
75 CHEV MALI 350
AFTER MTCE.
75 CHEV STAW 350
AFTER MTCE.
75 CHEV NOVA 350
AFTER MTCE.
TEST TYPE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT' TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
GRAMS P
HC CO
2
2
1
1
3
3
2
2
4
3
2
2
2
2
0
1
3
2
0
0
2
2
0
0
2
2
1
1
2
2
0
0
4
4
2
1
.00
.02
.16
.01
.92
.56
.27
.67
.12
.80
.04
.12
.52
.79
.45
.42
.01
.80
.62
.56
.06
.28
.47
.92
.04
.05
.92
.33
.65
.61
.70
.56
.01
.23
.08
.66
45
46
24
21
104
94
75
71
112
108
76
82
69
78
19
43
62
67
11
11
58
65
21
36
42
47
43
35
64
68
9
10
96
99
42
58
.1
.0
.3
.1
.1
.6
.8
.1
.1
.7
.8
.4
.1
.0
.6
.8
.6
.3
.0
.3
.9
.9
.7
.8
.8
.5
.7
.8
.2
.2
.7
.2
.4
.0
.0
.5
ER MILE
C02 NOXC
468
466
460
463
385
396
443
469
378
365
486
484
396
394
517
459
430
399
507
501
419
416
500
486
467
463
469
478
487
492
524
526
364
358
422
407
.2
.9
.5
.5
.7
.1
.8
.0
.8
.9
.6
.0
.7
.3
.5
.4
.6
.0
.6
.7
.8
.2
.2
.6
.9
.2
.5
.5
.4
.4
.7
.3
.6
.6
.6
.6
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
.24
.38
.75
.78
.52
.65
.31
.36
.10
.10
.35
.39
.60
,55
.18
.36
.78
.62
.77
.80
.53
.56
.10
.35
.96
.08
.68
.75
.95
n 0
.88
14
. 1
j A
.10
.59
rl
.57
lift
. ^"
in
.39
MPG
FUEL
ECON
16 1
1 v • j
16.3
• J
17.7
17.8
15.8
16.0
15.6
15.1
15.6
16.2
11.5
11,3
17.3
16.9
16.1
16.7
16.5
17.3
16.8
17.0
17.1
. n
16.8
» f t
16.6
A f 4
16.2
16. 1
At 5
16 J
t C, 3
16. J
l£ ">
10.-'
11.9
ill 6
if."
16 1
1 " •
16 3
| V 1 J
16.8
16.8
17-9
17. *
L-20
-------
APPENDIX L.CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL SHORT TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO.
599
600
608
609
610
611
613
615
616
YR MAKE MODL CID
75 CHEV MONT 350
AFTER MTCE.
75 CHEV MALI 350
AFTER MTCE.
75 CHEV CAPR 154
AFTER MTCE.
75 CHRY CORD 360
AFTER MTCE.
75 CHRY CORD 360
AFTER MTCE.
75 CHRY NEWP 400
AFTER MTCE.
75 CHRY NEWP 400
AFTER MTCE.
75 CHRY NEWY 440
AFTER MTCE.
?5 DODG DART 225
«
AFTER MTCE.
TEST TYPE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
'SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
2
2
1
2
3
4
1
1
11
10
0
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
0
10
9
1
1
3
3
1
1
2
2
0
0
2
1
2
1
HC
.21
.10
.54
.89
.99
.13
.95
.90
.21
.42
.80
.70
.95
.93
.63
.55
.78
.89
.83
.99
.21
.80
.35
.58
.70
.69
.39
.51
.55
.66
.26
.23
.24
.93
.11
.99
JRAMS PER MILE
CO C02
40
39
36
42
85
80
23
20
9
10
1
1
40
44
49
46
30
33
15
19
127
129
34
41
83
74
36
35
52
53
9
7
47
29
46
36
.6
.0
.4
.1
.0
.9
.9
.5
.5
.4
.9
.5
.0
.2
.8
.5
.0
.4
.7
.6
.0
.1
.6
.9
.0
.7
.3
.5
.9
.9
.4
.4
.2
.5
.8
.3
422
417
443
425
368
370
438
453
713
714
695
696
462
460
505
503
490
500
530
516
441
427
575
554
500
501
600
593
568
565
653
661
327
345
325
333
.9
.2
.4
.3
.1
.1
.3
.6
.1
.2
.7
.6
.4
.5
.5
.2
.2
.1
.5
.9
.6
.3
.6
.9
.4
.1
.6
.0
.2
.4
.1
.7
.0
.0
.6
.9
NOXC
2
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
2
1
1
0
0
0
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
0
1
1
0
0
1
2
1
1
.24
.09
.60
.61
.61
.72
.72
.70
.14
.00
.67
.74
.95
.97
.75
.66
.48
.47
.43
.40
.05
.09
.37
.26
.65
.72
.93
.85
.67
.81
.63
.65
.85
.34
.14
.35
MPG
FUEL
ECON
18.0
18.3
17.6
17.7
17.3
17.4
18.4
18.0
11.6
11.6
12.7
12.7
16.7
16.6
15.1
15.3
16.3
15.9
15.9
16.1
13.2
13.4
14.0
14.2
13.8
14.1
13.4
13.6
13.5
13.5
13.3
13.2
21.7
22.3
21 .9
22.3
L-21
-------
APPENDIX L.CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL SHORT TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO.
618
620
.
621
622
623
624
649
653
654
YR MAKE MODL CID
75 DODG DART 318
AFTER MTCE.
75 DODG CHAR 318
AFTER MTCE.
75 DODG CHAR 360
AFTER MTCE.
75 DODG CHAR 400
AFTER MTCE.
75 DODG MONA 400
AFTER MTCE.
75 FORD PINT 140
AFTER MTCE.
75 FORD GRAN 302
AFTER MTCE.
75 FORD STAW 351
AFTER MTCE.
75 FORD ELIT 400
AFTER MTCE.
TEST TYPE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
GRAMS PER MILE
HC CO C02 NOXC
2
2
0
0
2
2
1
1
2
2
0
1
2
2
1
2
4
4
2
2
1
1
1
1
4
3
3
3
1
1
0
0
3
3
0
0
.29
.01
.25
.24
.92
.68
.06
.42
.10
.06
.91
.07
.37
.31
.89
.62
.92
.03
.49
.30
.27
.31
.21
.17
.08
.86
.3*
.02
.35
.25
.97
.77
.18
.67
.68
.63
39
34
1
2
49
49
17
24
51
50
21
26
35
32
66
68
104
99
80
70
15
14
17
16
93
87
96
81
40
41
30
30
9
4
17
18
.6
.8
.8
.2
.8
.0
.6
.0
.9
.3
.6
.6
.9
.9
.8
.0
.4
.6
.1
.8
.5
.6
.9
.4
.6
.3
.5
.8
.8
.0
.3
.2
.9
.3
.6
.0
421
399
497
492
401
401
465
463
428
423
490
479
493
500
523
514
505
476
518
523
319
308
336
322
404
387
434
456
539
542
605
603
582
475
662
652
.7
.4
.8
.7
.1
.7
.0
.4
.4
.5
.1
.9
.2
.3
.6
.9
.0
.4
.4
.4
.4
.6
.8
.9
.4
.4
.2
.0
.4
.0
.0
.6
.3
.1
.4
.8
1
1
1
1
2
2
0
0
2
2
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
3
4
1
1
.85
.72
.70
.55
.66
.90
.78
.89
.01
.05
.59
.6H
.23
.28
.36
.24
.72
.70
.63
.61
.51
.53
.07
.07
.37
.35
.38
.31*
.30
i 0
.38
ft ll
.8*
.76
.08
4 1
. 1 '
u
•'
MPG
FUEL
ECON
18 1
1 v i I
19.3
•* • J
17.7
17.9
18,2
18,2
17.9
17.6
17.2
17.1
16.8
16.9
15.9
15.9
11.0
14,1
13.0
13.T
13.6
13-8
25.5
26.1
_ 1, 4
24.1
_ — n
25.2
15.7
i L C
16.5
4 ll 0
11.7
1 '
14.6
111 5
1 1 •'
11 5
\j>'
13.6
1 J •
14.6
18,0
12.8
13.0
L-22
-------
APPENDIX L.CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL SHORT TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
Vt'H
HO. YH MAKE MODL CID
655~"75 FORD LTD 460
v J J
AFTER MTCE.
656 75 FORD GRAN 351
AFTER MTCE.
661 75 FORD THND 460
AFTER MTCE.
665 76 LINC CONT 460
AFTER MTCE.
667 75 MERC MONA 200
AFTER MTCE.
6?2 75 MERC MONG 351
AFTER MTCE.
6?5 75 OLDS OMEG 260
AFTER MTCE.
689 75 PLYM DUST 225
AFTER MTCE.
690 ?5 PLYM VALI 225
•*
AFTER MTCE.
TEST TYPE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
1
2
2
1
1
0
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
0
2
2
0
1
2
2
1
1
---C
HC
.94
.10
.64
.33
.61
.41
.75
.94
.30
.74
.12
.11
.81
.22
.42
.61
.08
.50
.99
.79
.91
.77
.43
.36
.29
.33
.26
.24
.28
.18
.65
.13
.59
.48
.64
.40
JRAMS PER MILE
CO C02
71
34
11
20
63
59
11
18
67
103
23
30
10
10
0
4
10
11
10
9
47
49
16
16
21
21
3
3
40
35
9
16
56
57
35
32
.9
.0
.7
.9
.4
.3
.5
.3
.7
.3
.2
.3
.4
.4
.6
.8
.2
.3
.5
.0
.5
.7
.5
.5
.6
.2
.4
.5
.8
.7
.7
.5
.6
.6
.3
.0
666
684
685
682
490
494
492
548
595
559
724
711
619
593
694
687
355
356
357
346
528
546
578
569
415
411
517
520
373
336
362
346
351
351
370
376
.7
.7
.4
.9
.0
.2
.1
.8
.9
.6
.6
.3
.3
.3
.8
.0
.3
.8
.5
.9
.0
.0
.3
.5
.1
.1
.3
.2
.7
.0
.0
.8
.1
.0
.2
.6
i
NOXC
0
0
1
0
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
1
1
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
1
1
.69
.85
.07
.96
.45
.55
.23
.34
.90
.76
.98
.93
.20
.45
.18
.58
.44
.40
.43
.48
.59
.55
.06
.92
.49
.46
.71
.83
.56
.44
.45
.35
.65
.63
.29
.43
MPG
FUEL
ECON
11
12
12
12
14
14
17
15
12
12
11
11
13
14
12
12
23
23
23
24
14
14
14
14
19
19
17
16
19
22
23
23
19
19
20
20
.3
.0
.5
.3
.8
.9
.1
.2
.5
.1
.6
.6
.9
.5
.7
.7
.7
.4
.5
.4
.6
.1
.6
.8
.6
.8
.0
.9
.9
.2
.4
.6
.8
.7
.6
.6
L-23
-------
APPENDIX L.CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL SHORT TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO.
691
694
696
698
699
700
701
705
709
YR MAKE MODL CID
75 PLYM DUST 225
AFTER MTCE.
75 PLYM FURY 360
AFTER MTCE.
75 PONT FIRE 250
AFTER MTCE.
75 PONT FIRE 350
AFTER MTCE.
75 PONT LEMA 350
AFTER MTCE.
75 PONT CATA 400
AFTER MTCE.
76 PONT FIRE UOO
,
AFTER MTCE.
75 DATS B210 85
AFTER MTCE.
75 OPEL STAW 116
AFTER MTCE.
TEST TYPE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT-TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
GRAMS P
HC CO
2
2
1
1
5
5
1
0
1
2
0
0
6
6
3
3
2
1
0
0
4
4
3
2
3
3
2
3
1
1
1
1
2
2
1
2
.23
.17
.42
.38
.76
.07
.53
.91
.99
.17
.32
.39
.99
.84
.24
.40
.35
.92
.79
.72
.79
.28
.12
.87
.11
.28
.99
.17
.31
.24
.30
.20
.26
.56
.97
.03
36
32
30
29
95
90
33
20
44
45
3
3
149
116
82
82
73
46
23
13
94
89
96
87
91
101
115
125
21
18
16
14
66
63
48
44
.6
.1
.7
.6
.7
.5
.5
.3
.1
.1
.4
.2
.6
.5
.0
.5
.3
.2
.2
.8
.5
.0
.3
.5
.2
.5
.6
.0
.2
.3
.6
.4
.8
.7
.3
.7
ER MILE
C02 NOXC
327
327
360
352
428
413
526
540
333
329
363
368
352
391
394
403
428
460
460
477
418
431
517
534
419
402
432
424
255
258
235
236
304
306
311
321
.2
.8
,1
.2
.9
.4
.0
.1
.5
.3
.1
.2
.9
.2
.4
.9
.7
.3
.8
.8
.8
.8
.3
.4
.9
.3
.9
.8
.8
.3
.6
.7
.4
.5
.7
.7
1
1
0
0
1
1
1
1
2
2
1
1
0
0
0
0
1
2
1
2
1
1
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
1
1
1
0
0
.30
.32
.74
.8H
.60
.6H
.71
.67
.15
.11
.99
.99
.21
.38
.63
.67
.82
.56
.82
.21
.19
.21
.38
.39
.28
,15
.11
.37
.92
A II
.01
f 1
.63
nt
.80
.53
r r\
.60
(.0
,\J7
on
,0V
MPG
FUEL
ECON
22.7
• I
23.0
21 5
• i j
22.0
14.9
15.5
15.2
15J
21.7
21.8
24.0
23. 7
11,5
11.9
16.6
16J
16.1
16.5
17.8
17.7
15.2
15.2
. fL |
13.1
* i ft
13.0
15.5
AC C
15.5
< i| 5
I'M
111 1
1". '
30J
30.5
jui
« 1
jj'
33.7
j-"
21.3
21.'
22.5
22-3
L-24
-------
APPENDIX L.CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL SHORT TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO.
713
711
715
716
717
046
017
018
019
YR MAKE MODL CID
75 TOYO CORO 134
AFTER MTCE.
75 VOLK SEDA 97
AFTER MTCE.
75 VOLK SEDA 97
AFTER MTCE.
75 VOLK SEDA 97
AFTER MTCE.
75 VOLK TRAN 109
AFTER MTCE.
71 AMMO HORN 304
AFTER MTCE.
74 BUIC RIVI 455
AFTER MTCE.
74 BUIC CENT 350
AFTER MTCE.
71* CHEV VEGA 140
-#
AFTER MTCE.
TEST TYPE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
n
HC
1 .
1.
1.
1 .
1 .
1 .
1 .
1 .
2.
2.
2.
2.
2.
2.
1 .
1 .
2.
3.
1 .
2.
3.
3.
3.
3.
3.
3.
4.
3.
2.
3.
1.
1 .
2.
2\
2.
2.
09
10
13
08
66
77
12
15
52
75
15
13
45
36
99
69
95
09
76
13
77
78
18
33
42
11
83
22
94
21
64
60
06
07
12
04
RAMS PER MILE
CO C02
23
23
21
21
15
18
7
6
55
60
32
18
56
53
31
31
41
46
33
34
29
28
20
19
25
28
29
37
55
66
39
34
42
42
45
41
.2
.4
.2
.8
.9
.4
.3
.5
.6
.0
.1
.1
.9
.9
.0
.3
.6
.7
.7
.5
.7
.5
.2
.1
.6
.0
.9
.8
'.9
.4
.5
.6
.4
.0
.2
.5
325
330
359
357
249
251
340
370
193
199
264
250
219
206
279
282
305
308
367
368
405
404
448
452
605
570
594
581
430
427
517
526
259
260
246
253
.2
.4
.2
.1
.0
.9
.1
.3
.4
.6
.7
.1
.5
.2
.2
.3
.7
.9
.7
.7
.6
.0
.1
.0
.6
.6
.2
.2
.6
.7
.1
.8
.2
.0
.9
.4
NOXC
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
0
0
2
2
1
1
.61
.60
.67
.69
.55
.39
.95
.02
.59
.67
.70
.02
.58
.52
.53
.54
.83
.77
.74
.69
.35
.46
.81
.73
.67
.17
.35
.10
.72
.46
.87
.98
.07
.00
.73
.85
MPG
FUEL
ECON
24.3
23.9
22.4
22.5
31.8
31.0
25.0
23.1
30.7
29.3
27.6
31.1
28.0
29.7
26.6
26.4
23.3
22.6
20.8
20.7
19.1
19.3
18.1
18.0
13.5
14.2
13.5
13.6
16.8
16.4
15.2
15.1
26.7
26.7
27.3
27.3
L-25
-------
APPENDIX L.CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL SHORT TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
/ DENVER
VEH
NO.
050
051
052
053
054
055
056
057
058
YR MAKE MODL CID
74 CHEV MONT 350
AFTER MTCE.
74 CHEV NOVA 250
AFTER MTCE.
74 CHEV CAMA 350
AFTER MTCE.
74 CHEV CHEL 350
AFTER MTCE.
74 CHEV CAPR 400
AFTER MTCE.
74 DODG CHAR 318
AFTER MTCE.
74 DODG DART 225
AFTER MTCE.
74 FORD PINT 122
AFTER MTCE.
74 FORD MAVE 302
AFTER MTCE.
TEST TYPE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
GRAMS PER MILE
HC CO C02
3
3
3
4
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
3
2
1
1
4
3
3
3
7
8
3
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
.55
.67
.71
.27
.92
.97
.92
.98
.73
.85
.52
.44
.09
.92
.70
.77
.29
.97
.75
.48
.56
.01
.59
.54
.56
.73
.33
.33
.84
.89
.38
.51
.59
.53
.11
.23
73
78
30
29
33
34
26
25
58
61
47
49
50
47
31
31
123
110
67
58
124
120
56
53
58
57
44
42
25
23
25
22
83
80
40
45
.9
.7
.4
.3
.9
.3
.9
.3
.8
.9
.8
.0
.3
-9
.7
.4
.4
.2
.2
.7
.9
.4
.6
.7
.1
.9
.4
.8
.2
.6
.1
.8
.1
.1
.7
.0
455
468
456
451
377
379
357
349
481
468
476
454
506
505
540
547
600
604
617
621
310
368
420
417
311
301
357
353
265
268
242
243
408
413
404
408
.0
.0
.5
.8
.0
.6
.3
.4
.0
.9
.9
.7
.6
.2
.0
.1
.3
.5
.6
.0
.1
.5
.7
.0
.5
.2
.6
.9
.0
.2
.4
.3
.2
.5
.1
.1
NOXC
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
1
1
0
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
0
A
1
1
.52
.56
.82
.84
.12
.16
.96
.04
.72
.71
.63
.64
.65
.63
.72
.72
.04
.16
.11
.09
.49
.92
.08
.35
.32
.38
.29
.39
.62
f f
.65
*T It
.7*
.72
r, i
.70
nc
.23
O7
.2(
MPQ
FUEL
ECON
15 2
* S | 4.
14.7
• I
17.2
17.4
'20.3
20.2
21.9
22J
15.2
15.4
15.8
16.5
14.9
15.0
14.9
14.7
11.0
11.2
12.1
12.3
16.7
15.2
nn
.0
nl
.3
21.1
22.J
o/i 7
20. (
28.3
?fi 2
/JO.1-
30.7
30.9
16.1
16.1
18.6
18.1
L-26
-------
APPENDIX L.CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL SHORT TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO.
059
060
061
062
063
064
065
066
06?
YR MAKE MODL CID
74 FORD MAVE 250
AFTER MTCE.
74 FORD LTD 400
AFTER MTCE.
74 FORD LTD 400
AFTER MTCE.
74 LINC CONT 460
AFTER MTCE.
74 MERC MONT 302
AFTER MTCE.
74 OLDS CUTL 350
AFTER MTCE.
74 OLDS DELT 350
AFTER MTCE.
71 OLDS 98 455
AFTER MTCE.
74 PLYM SATE 318
,*
AFTER MTCE.
TEST TYPE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
3
3
2
2
4
4
2
2
2
2
2
2
4
4
3
3
3
3
3
3
4
4
4
4
4
3
4
3
3
3
3
3
5
6
3
3
HC
.00
.02
.54
.49
.26
.06
.96
.91
.21
.22
.45
.53
.87
.73
.98
.90
.83
.71
.69
.78
.28
.46
.02
.04
.08
.90
.01
.83
.34
.29
.19
.49
.48
.17
.41
.49
3RAMS P
CO
50.
47.
61.
60.
49.
45.
71 .
61.
32.
34.
25.
28.
102.
92.
44.
48.
39.
31.
25.
26.
62.
68.
72.
63.
94.
81.
55.
44.
57.
55.
64.
85.
28.
28.
28.
27.
4
5
7
2
3
8
8
5
0
3
2
3
7
4
0
4
7
5
1
7
7
2
6
7
4
8
5
8
8
1
1
2
7
0
5
3
ER MILE
C02
318
328
352
355
447
452
566
520
546
537
570
559
539
540
581
589
468
480
471
472
461
457
486
492
484
497
512
526
535
536
519
502
415
416
459
460
.1
.9
.3
.8
.3
.2
.2
.8
.1
.5
.9
.8
.0
.9
.1
.0
.4
.7
.7
.9
.8
.4
.1
.0
.9
.1
.8
.2
.9
.4
.0
.4
.6
.3
.2
.5
NOXC
0
1
0
0
1
1
1
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
1
1
0
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
1
2
2
1
1
.99
.06
.59
.61
.45
.56
.12
.94
.81
.99
.68
.70
.65
.67
.60
.76
.43
.50
.47
.48
.23
.16
.93
.01
.08
.38
.38
.68
.23
.21
.24
.88
.18
.62
.65
.66
MPG
FUEL
ECON
21.8
21.5
19.4
19.4
16.5
16.5
12.9
14.2
14.7
14.8
14.4
14.5
12.4
12.7
13.4
13.1
16.3
16.4
17.0
16.8
15.5
15.3
14.5
14.7
13.7
13.9
14.5
14.6
13.9
14.0
14.1
13.7
18.6
18.5
17.2
17.3
L-27
-------
APPENDIX L.CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL SHORT TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO.
068
069
070
071
072
073
074
075
352
YR MAKE MODL CID
74 PLYM DUST 225
AFTER MTCE.
74 PONT BONN 400
AFTER MTCE.
74 PONT LEMA 350
AFTER MTCE.
74 DATS 610 119
AFTER MTCE.
74 MAZD RX3 70
AFTER MTCE.
74 TOYO CELI 97
AFTER MTCE.
74 VOLK SEDA 97
AFTER MTCE.
74 VOLK SEDA 97
AFTER MTCE.
74 CHRY NEWP 400
AFTER MTCE.
TEST TYPE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
r
HC
2
2
2
2
4
4
5
5
4
5
4
4
3
3
3
2
5
8
1
2
2
1
1
1
4
3
4
4
3
3
4
4
5
5
2
2
.89
.84
.20
.10
.05
.48
.04
.05
.75
.03
.29
.29
.45
.06
.07
.32
.56
.11
.52
.13
.08
.94
.96
.97
.05
.77
.70
.31
.10
.40
.46
.60
.66
.56
.62
.61
(RAMS
CO
45.
42.
28.
29.
24.
24.
9.
7.
80.
105.
43.
41.
40.
36.
41.
38.
61.
78.
21.
28.
29.
26.
19.
19.
36.
40.
34.
32.
37.
36.
20.
27.
88.
84.
32.
30.
PER MILE
C02
6
2
6
8
6
1
1
0
8
8
9
8
6
5
6
0
3
2
9
1
4
8
6
7
8
8
6
0
2
5
1
9
2
8
5
0
327
329
354
355
540
542
546
544
481
455
513
510
275
277
278
275
394
358
478
474
300
311
308
317
210
207
220
218
212
215
230
226
502
508
565
571
.8
.9
.8
.3
.0
.0
.7
.8
.0
.0
.7
.1
.4
..8
.9
.4
.5
.2
.2
.5
.7
.3
.9
.2
.7
.8
.2
.6
.6
.2
.1
.8
.8
.2
.7
.1
NOXC
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
.58
.69
.17
.21
.66
.79
.83
.81
.75
.30
.19
.34
.70
.77
.78
.76
.35
.40
.38
.39
.38
.41
.32
.43
.51
.43
.35
.36
.31
— /\
.30
f n
.57
- I.
.64
.19
1, £
.45
r f\
.50
fn
.60
MPG
FUEL
ECON
21 7
1 i 1
21.9
1 • /
21.8
21.7
15.0
11.9
15.1
15.5
11.2
13.9
11.9
15.1
25.3
25.7
25.1
25.9
17.5
17.5
17.2
16.9
25.1
21.7
25.7
25.0
31.5
-i< i
31J
•» rt *]
30.)
o1 ll
31, 1
11*3
3'iJ
32.2
ol 1
jl.l
13.5
13.5
1 J '
11.2
1
11.2
L-28
-------
APPENDIX L.CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL SHORT TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO.
354
J *
721
724
728
731
732
711
743
744
YR MAKE MODL CID
74 FORD ELIT 351
AFTER MTCE.
74 AMMO GREM 232
AFTER MTCE.
74 BUIC APOL 350
AFTER MTCE.
71 CHEV VEGA 140
AFTER MTCE.
74 CHEV NOVA 350
AFTER MTCE.
74 CHEV NOVA 350
AFTER MTCE.
74 FORD PINT 122
AFTER MTCE.
74 FORD PINT 140
AFTER MTCE.
™ FORD PINT 140
•
AFTER MTCE.
TEST TYPE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
5
4
4
4
4
3
3
3
6
6
3
4
3
3
2
2
4
4
3
3
16
18
10
10
3
3
3
3
6
4
3
3
4
4
2
2
HC
.04
.89
.80
.50
.16
.98
.15
.23
.67
.32
.50
.08
.36
.45
.58
.68
.38
.08
.60
.69
.45
.14
.86
.11
.72
.77
.48
.10
.19
.94
.77
.76
.21
.22
.78
.95
5RAMS PER MILE
CO C02
85
75
43
44
60
59
43
43
132
126
29
27
60
62
31
30
53
36
53
52
139
154
142
123
31
32
35
29
85
79
59
59
69
67
51
50
.9
.6
.1
.2
.6
.2
.9
.3
.4
.7
.2
.6
.6
.6
.8
.7
.6
.4
.1
.6
.9
.6
.1
.9
.4
.7
.3
.0
.2
.3
.9
.6
.2
.1
.2
.7
456
457
465
445
347
336
337
356
407
410
532
533
252
261
272
280
429
445
464
469
403
391
399
415
241
234
260
268
229
237
258
259
239
241
313
324
.5
.4
.3
.6
.9
.4
.8
.6
.5
.1
.9
.7
.2
.2
.6
.8
.8
.5
.2
.0
.5
.8
.9
.6
.4
.3
.5
.1
.2
.5
.0
.5
.4
.7
.9
.3
NOXC
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
0
0
1
1
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.33
.49
.43
.63
.07
.06
.20
.36
.60
.64
.10
.14
.71
.70
.06
.16
.48
.58
.49
.48
.67
.57
.38
.41
.34
.31
.71
.87
.34
.40
.38
.40
.68
.73
.75
.81
MPG
FUEL
ECON
14.6
15.0
16.2
16.8
19.5
20.1
21.3
20.4
13.9
14.1
15.0
15.0
24.8
24.0
26.8
26.3
16.8
17.2
15.9
15.8
13.1
12.8
13.5
13.8
29.3
29.8
27.1
27.4
23.2
23.5
24.4
24.3
24.6
24.6
22.0
21.5
L-29
-------
APPENDIX L.CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL SHORT TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO.
748
753
,
757
758
760
761
762
765
770
YR MAKE MODL CID
74 FORD MAVE 302
AFTER MTCE.
74 FORD STAW 400
AFTER MTCE.
74 OLDS CUTL 350
AFTER MTCE.
74 OLDS CUTL 350
AFTER MTCE.
74 PLYM DUST 225
AFTER MTCE.
74 PLYM DUST 318
AFTER MTCE.
74 PLYM FRY3 360
AFTER MTCE.
74 PONT LEMA 350
AFTER MTCE.
74 COLT SEDA 98
AFTER MTCE.
TEST TYPE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
G
HC
5
4
2
2
3
3
3
3
4
4
3
3
4
4
5
4
3
3
2
2
3
3
2
2
5
5
7
7
5
6
7
8
2
2
1
1
.83
.58
.29
.48
.57
.76
.19
.58
.82
.75
.77
.55
.57
.76
.01
.91
.67
.31
.59
.53
.52
.27
.96
.86
.89
.73
.37
.83
.99
.24
.09
.74
.66
.19
.71
.68
RAMS PER MILE
CO C02 NOXC
28
20
12
14
57
58
37
30
68
62
37
34
37
31
33
40
50
48
29
27
55
45
47
42
94
88
59
54
72
70
19
22
38
34
26
24
.2
.3
.2
.8
.8
.5
.8
.4
.8
.0
.7
.3
.4
.3
.1
.1
.4
.1
.6
.9
.7
.6
.4
.7
.1
.7
.7
.3
.2
.2
.6
.1
.3
.1
.3
.5
385
397
418
412
572
560
580
590
474
477
539
534
473
476
485
476
314
316
331
334
408
425
441
441
475
469
503
504
470
461
508
490
220
222
228
241
.3
.8
.4
.9
.9
.5
.3
.1
.1
.7
.0
.5
.3
.6
.2
.2
.0
.0
.1
.6
.1
.7
.3
.3
.3
.5
.6
.2
.5
.6
.7
.0
.8
.1
.5
.6
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
3
4
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
3
2
2
1
1
.65
.84
.88
.87
.97
.98
.92
.12
.57
.66
.42
.48
.45
.55
.35
.26
.56
.88
.66
.94
.57
.10
.40
.46
.74
.80
.70
f\ f-
.85
.18
A A
.29
_ /•
.36
** O
.38
.34
h i
.47
19
.22
ill
.31
MPG
FUEL
ECON
19.8
20,0
19 9
y • J
20.0
13.1
13.1
13.7
13.7
11.9
15.0
11.5
11.8
16.2
16.1)
16.0
16.0
21.9
22.1
23.0
23.0
17.5
17.5
. f A
16.9
nA
.2
13.8
4 ll 0
11.2
A ll 3
1H.3
1U 1
in. *
11.7
1"5 0
i j '
1<; 8
15. u
16 1
| U . '
30.7
31.1
J
32.2
I-1
J
L-30
-------
APPENDIX L.CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL SHORT TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO.
11*
l i
776
777
;78o
1101
1102
1103
1IOH
1(05
YR MAKE MODL CID
74 FIAT 128 79
AFTER MTCE.
7H TOYO CORO 120
AFTER MTCE.
74 TOYO CORO 97
AFTER MTCE.
74 VOLV 142 121
AFTER MTCE.
7^ AMMO HORN 232
AFTER MTCE.
73 BUIC ELEC 455
AFTER MTCE.
73 CADI DEVI 472
AFTER MTCE.
73 CHEV VEGA 140
AFTER MTCE.
73 CHEV MALI 350
*
AFTER MTCE.
TEST TYPE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
4
3
1
1
2
2
1
1
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
3
2
2
4
3
3
3
3
3
4
4
3
2
2
2
HC
.10
.84
.13
.30
.29
.38
.91
.91
.68
.84
.35
.42
.47
.37
.06
.04
.66
.83
.38
.16
.24
.99
.76
.65
.06
.94
.70
.82
.92
.59
.22
.05
.11
.92
.16
.68
3RAMS PER MILE
CO C02
60
58
48
43
24
24
22
26
63
64
34
34
50
50
22
21
21
20
20
9
67
59
71
59
103
99
65
68
58
59
58
54
40
36
32
48
.9
.9
.3
.6
.3
.6
.8
.3
.6
.4
.4
.2
.9
.4
.9
.3
.5
.3
.2
.4
.7
.3
.8
.0
.8
.6
.1
.8
.0
.6
.9
.9
.2
.5
.4
.3
245
236
404
375
288
285
309
300
231
236
235
235
278
279
275
280
324
335
366
373
553
569
538
548
585
603
612
609
287
271
265
279
418
410
464
459
.4
.3
.3
.5
.7
.8
.7
.7
.1
.0
.0
.6
.8
.3
.6
.4
.0
.6
.2
.9
.9
.6
.3
.0
.5
.1
.9
.0
.7
.4
.2
.3
.6
.6
.0
.7
NOXC
0.
0.
0.
0.
2.
2.
1.
1.
0.
0.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
5.
5.
2.
2.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
1.
1.
1.
1.
0.
0.
1.
1.
0.
0.
60
69
66
60
20
05
71
57
90
97
60
61
07
07
27
34
55
60
18
56
73
84
78
87
79
82
27
25
20
01
88
92
18
19
88
74
MPG
FUEL
ECON
25.1
26.0
18.3
19.8
26.6
26.7
25.2
25.5
25.9
25.4
29.9
29.9
24.2
24.2
27.9
27.7
24.2
23.6
21.9
22.4
13.2
13.1
13.4
13.7
11.7
11.5
12.2
12.2
22.7
23.6
23.9
23.5
18.1
18.6
17.0
16.3
L-31
-------
APPENDIX L.CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL SHORT TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO.
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
YR MAKE MODL CID
73 CHEV NOVA 350
AFTER MTCE.
73 CHEV IMPA 350
AFTER MTCE.
73 CHEV IMPA 350
AFTER MTCE.
73 CHEV IMPA 400
AFTER MTCE.
73 DODG DART 225
AFTER MTCE.
73 FORD PINT 122
AFTER MTCE.
73 FORD TORI 351
AFTER MTCE.
73 FORD MAVE 302
AFTER MTCE.
73 FORD GUST 351
AFTER MTCE.
TEST TYPE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
r.
HC
2
2
2
1
7
4
2
2
2
2
2
3
2
2
1
1
3
3
2
2
2
3
2
2
3
3
2
2
4
4
2
2
7
7
4
4
.54
.68
.07
.93
.82
.16
.41
.45
.40'
.47
.96
.32
.18
.16
.80
.84
.55
.62
.44
.42
.71
.08
.76
.47
.48
.84
.38
.57
.47
.53
.86
.88
.87
.36
.73
.75
RAMS PER MILE
CO C02 NOXC
57
55
47
48
60
19
13
15
44
43
24
17
36
28
21
19
62
63
35
34
42
41
31
25
60
81
37
46
81
84
37
38
136
131
57
57
.8
.8
.1
.1
.9
.4
.4
.8
.7
.3
.7
.6
.1
.5
.7
.5
.7
.3
.7
.5
.1
.7
.7
.6
.4
.4
.2
.1
.8
.6
.2
.5
.6
.8
.9
.5
425
419
476
469
420
440
499
499
504
509
490
492
521
521
545
540
274
278
303
300
242
243
244
244
490
473
598
581
362
366
447
444
385
392
475
481
.3
.1
.9
.6
.8
.7
.2
.1
.7
.5
.0
.2
.2
.3
.1
.2
.2
.9
.5
.2
.0
.9
.2
.1
.1
.9
.5
.6
.2
.0
.9
.9
.4
.4
.4
.6
0
0
0
0
2
2
1
1
0
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
3
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
1
1
3
.83
.77
.79
.77
.06
.57
.91
.95
.87
.90
.13
.38
.48
.59
.36
.43
.45
.43
.35
.39
.13
.19
.14
.46
.77
.64
.53
..32
.52
li 0
.48
.
.80
£ 1
.62
•j 2
.33
37
.3'
MPG
FUEL
ECON
16,9
• w • y
17.2
' 1 | IB
15.9
+ 9 J
16.1
16.il
18.3
16.8
16.7
15.2
15.2
16.5
16.7
15.2
15.5
15.2
15.1
23.1
22.8
24.2
24.5
28.0
n
27.8
29.3
- * It
30.1
14.9
« li C
14.5
A f\ ll
13- 1
\\ il
U'4
17.6
17 3
1 1 ij
17 2
ii.
17 3
1 1 • J
14.2
14.2
i ' •
15.3
15,1
L-32
-------
APPENDIX L.CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL SHORT TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO.
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
YR MAKE MODL CID
73 FORD LTD 400
AFTER MTCE.
73 MERC MONR 400
AFTER MTCE.
73 OLDS 98 455
AFTER MTCE.
73 OLDS CUTL 350
AFTER MTCE.
73 PLYM SATE 318
AFTER MTCE.
73 PLYM DUST 225
AFTER MTCE.
73 PONT CATA 400
AFTER MTCE.
?3 PONT LEMA 350
AFTER MTCE.
?3 DATS TRUC 97
*
AFTER MTCE.
TEST TYPE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
3
3
2
2
3
3
3
3
2
1
3
2
3
4
3
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
1
1
5
6
6
7
3
3
4
4
4
5
6
7
HC
.37
.51
.41
.40
.48
.44
.43
.41
.29
.75
.19
.80
.81
.10
.67
.65
.86
.67
.68
.60
.39
.27
.99
.95
.82
.35
.63
.41
.47
.54
.41
.73
.84
.23
.89
.06
RAMS PER MILE
CO C02
76
77
29
29
46
41
34
37
32
14
54
41
86
99
34
41
82
74
28
27
13
11
16
18
21
17
7
8
29
31
17
20
24
22
34
34
.8
.5
.9
.9
.5
.0
.6
.0
.4
.7
.0
.0
.7
.1
.9
.1
.4
.8
.4
.0
.9
.7
.8
.2
.5
.5
.7
.4
.4
.5
.9
.5
.0
.9
.7
.6
467
475
496
512
483
493
497
490
619
643
582
589
480
480
483
488
400
403
437
435
331
318
350
343
525
525
549
549
519
522
518
516
292
293
302
303
.9
.2
.8
.2
.4
.9
.7
.6
.4
.4
.5
.6
.4
.1
.6
.9
.7
.3
.6
.0
.2
.0
.5
.0
.1
.2
.7
.4
.9
.4
.3
.3
.7
.6
.6
.0
NOXC
2
2
3
3
2
2
3
2
1
2
1
1
0
0
1
1
1
1
2
2
4
4
3
2
4
4
5
4
2
2
2
2
1
1
0
0
.42
.45
.21
.13
.53
.61
.04
.91
.78
.02
.07
.14
.62
.60
.85
.55
.77
.85
.45
.36
.57
.43
.29
.86
.55
.25
.20
.53
.47
.48
.43
.54
.08
.08
.88
.86
MPG
FUEL
ECON
14.8
14.6
16.1
15.7
15.6
15.6
15.8
15.9
13.1
13.2
13.1
13.4
14.1
13.7
16.1
15.7
16.4
16.7
18.1
18.3
24.6
25.8
23.2
23.5
15.4
15.5
15.2
15.1
15.4
15.2
15.8
15.8
25.7
25.6
23.4
23.4
L-33
-------
APPENDIX L.CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL SHORT TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO.
124
125
126
127
375
377
380
782
788
YR MAKE MODL CID
73 OPEL MANT 116
AFTER MTCE.
73 TOYO CORO 97
AFTER MTCE.
73 VOLK KOMB 103
AFTER MTCE.
73 VOLK SEDA 97
AFTER MTCE;
73 DODG CHAR 318
AFTER MTCE.
73 FORD PINT 122
AFTER MTCE.
73 FORD THND 460
AFTER MTCE.
73 AMMO HORN 304
AFTER MTCE.
73 CADI DEVI 472
AFTER MTCE.
TEST TYPE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
GRAMS PER MILE
HC CO C02 NOXC
4
4
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
0
1
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
3
7
7
5
5
9
8
3
3
7
7
13
14
.09
.32
.71
.48
.28
.42
.87
.99
.37
.35
.97
.04
.29
.47
.28
.00
.56
.29
.35
.03
.53
.49
.81
.18
.87
.12
.35
.03
.12
.51
.49
.44
.96
.79
.61
.33
74
76
54
48
38
42
16
18
36
33
17
17
46
47
35
38
64
60
53
56
54
51
27
27
144
122
58
49
88
83
14
18
108
113
114
130
.2
.8
.6
.9
.2
.3
.9
.2
.7
.4
.3
.6
.8
.9
.2
.2
.7
.6
.0
.3
.1
.5
.4
.3
.6
.7
.5
.7
.0
.2
.9
.6
.3
.9
.2
.4
227
228
254
250
278
274
269
265
367
367
359
356
229
226
225
226
388
367
432
434
292
285
252
256
488
467
622
623
464
481
456
455
510
519
511
503
.3
.7
.6
.8
.5
.3
.5
.3
.8
.7
.9
.1
.7
.5
.8
.0
.3
.5
.6
.8
.9
.2
.1
.7
.7
.6
.5
.9
.6
.8
.3
.6
.0
.2
.6
.5
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
0
0
1
1
0
0
2
2
1
0
0
0
.79
.79
.79
.80
.71
.72
.26
.25
.31
.12
.37
.38
.40
.41
.57
.61
.50
.53
.33
.20
.27
.28
.21
JO
.51
.58
.03
.06
.86
.93
*» *>
.73
p" f\
.52
.01
t\ f\
.99
n9
.93
o c
.85
MPG
FUEL
ECON
24 Q
* 7
24,4
i •
25. 4
26.5
25.?
25.5
29.4
29.6
20.7
20.9
22.7
22.9
28.3
28.4
30.4
30.0
17.7
18.8
16.9
16.7
22.8
23.5
29.2
28.7
12.0
11 fi
3.°
A f\ 4
12.1
40 11
12.1
14.0
13.9
18*1
\0 , '
17 9
11''
12J
1 t- • •*
12.1
i •*
L-34
-------
APPENDIX L.CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL SHORT TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
MPG
VEH GRAMS PER MILE FUEL
N0 YR MAKE MODL CID TEST TYPE HC CO C02 NOXC ECON
790
i *
791
795
808
809
810
811
812
813
73 CHEV VEGA 140
AFTER MTCE.
73 CHEV VEGA 140
AFTER MTCE.
73 CHEV NOVA 307
AFTER MTCE;
.
73 CHEV STAW 454
AFTER MTCE.
73 CHRY NEWP 400
AFTER MTCE.
73 CHRY NEWY 440
AFTER MTCE.
73 DODG DART 225
AFTER MTCE.
73 DODG DART 318
AFTER MTCE.
73 DODG CHAR 400
*
AFTER MTCE.
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
5
6
3
3
2
2
2
2
9
9
2
2
6
4
4
5
5
5
4
4
3
4
2
2
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
1
17
16
16
17
.99
.65
.09
.45
.75
.59
.38
.29
.24
.44
.64
.54
.44
.30
.53
.24
.49
.30
.40
.69
.93
.76
.75
.70
.09
.31
.79
.57
.91
.81
.36
.87
.10
.64
.24
.83
57
59
41
40
72
61
53
50
27
30
29
26
84
91
75
80
75
71
69
71
45
42
59
64
49
52
34
32
49
45
24
12
110
95
118
146
.5
.6
.3
.6
.3
.4
.4
.3
.0
.7
.7
.1
.1
.7
.0
.4
.9
.8
.2
.2
.0
.5
.1
.6
.4
.4
.7
.5
.0
.5
.7
.9
.4
.9
.1
.4
237
236
300
287
251
258
261
265
353
348
457
453
591
595
576
546
459
451
486
480
530
533
612
616
289
259
317
318
372
358
385
391
451
491
539
519
.6
.7
.9
.6
.9
.6
. 1
.5
.4
.7
.1
.2
.0
.7
.2
.3
.9
.2
.6
.6
.7
.0
.4
.9
.2
.1
.2
.3
.5
.1
.5
.4
.5
.8
.4
.2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
0
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
.04
.06
.07
.11
.00
.25
.32
.36
.15
.96
.92
.05
.11
.07
.42
.23
.10
.06
.08
.05
.82
.79
.14
.11
.54
.38
.59
.80
.40
.57
.18
.47
.73
.95
.61
.58
25.6
25.3
23.6
24.5
23.7
24.4
25.2
25.2
20.9
20.8
17.3
17.7
11.9
11.8
12.5
12.9
14.9
15.3
14.6
14.6
14.5
14.4
12.4
12.2
23.6
25.2
23.3
23.5
19.3
20.2
20.6
21.3
13.1
12.8
11.4
11.0
L-35
-------
APPENDIX L.CONT'D
>
LISTING OF FEDERAL SHORT TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO.
814
820
821
822
823
824
826
828
831
YR MAKE MODL CID
73 DODG DART 318
AFTER MTCE.
73 FORD MAVE 250
AFTER MTCE.
73 FORD MAVE 302
AFTER MTCE.
73 FORD MAVE 250
AFTER MTCE.
73 FORD MUST 302
AFTER MTCE.
73 FORD MAVE 302
AFTER MTCE.
73 FORD LTD 429
AFTER MTCE.
73 FORD TORI 351
AFTER MTCE.
73 MERC COME 250
AFTER MTCE.
GRAMS
TEST TYPE HC CO
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
4
4
3
3
3
3
2
2
3
3
2
2
3
3
3
3
8
8
8
8
3
3
3
3
4
5
4
4
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
2
.26
.59
.08
.28
.25
.12
.87
.79
.79
.70
.99
.98
.29
.39
.27
.35
.64
.60
.28
.00
.49
.45
.51
.48
.61
.27
.72
.64
.85
.76
.18
.21
.03
.14
.30
.29
83.
79.
37.
39.
80.
75.
49.
50.
58.
60.
17.
19.
31.
31.
26.
28.
78.
67.
77.
81.
63.
60.
58.
63.
119.
95.
35.
28.
70.
68.
33.
40.
77.
84.
68.
70.
PER MILE
C02 NOXC
8
7
4
7
0
3
8
9
4
3
2
8
5
4
6
8
6
0
8
5
9
2
7
3
5
6
1
9
6
7
2
1
7
0
0
8
386
374
413
400
340
341
346
360
431
422
463
460
327
324
335
339
390
391
439
411
451
443
485
466
469
565
606
593
475
493
468
466
331
326
390
374
.5
.5
.2
.2
.0
.1
.1
.7
.8
.9
.6
.7
.7
.1
.2
.9
.9
.5
.7
.3
.2
.8
.3
.9
.2
.8
.2
.3
.1
.6
.3
.3
.7
.5
.1
.4
0
1
1
1
0
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
.97
.37
.18
.51
.88
.91
.12
.13
.06
.02
.59
.58
.70
.78
.56
.45
.38
.56
.42
JO
.85
.84
.73
.66
.89
.28
.38
..42
.51
ii L
.46
f\ O
.92
ft n
.79
.86
Qf.
.00
86
. 00
O ^
.82
MPQ
FUEL
ECON
16.7
17.3
1 • J
18.it
18.8
18.6
18.9
20.5
19.7
16.6
16.8
17.7
17.7
22.9
23.1
22.9
22.1
16.11
16.9
15.1
15.7
15.8
16.2
j f 4
15.1
. - it
15,*
13.2
40 1
12.1
n)
.1
13 Ii
u."
11.8
-------
APPENDIX L.CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL SHORT TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO.
835
837
839
840
8112
813
84i|
81)5
8H6
YR
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
MAKE MODL CID
OLDS CUTL 350
AFTER MTCE.
OLDS CUTL 350
AFTER MTCE.
PLYM DUST 225
AFTER MTCE.
PLYM DUST 318
AFTER MTCE.
PLYM SATE 318
AFTER MTCE.
PLYM FRY3 360
AFTER MTCE.
PONT VENT 350
AFTER MTCE.
PONT LEMA 350
AFTER MTCE.
PONT LEMA 350
-#
AFTER MTCE.
TEST TYPE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
3
3
2
3
4
4
3
4
2
2
2
2
5
5
3
3
6
5
5
5
3
3
2
2
8
8
6
6
5
5
9
9
8
8
4
4
HC
.53
.25
.95
.08
.57
.56
.98
.29
.64
.65
.44
.20
.22
.28
.70
.24
.12
.45
.63
.39
.97
.89
.79
.70
.52
.27
.23
.81
.94
.27
.46
.31
.56
.09
.55
.58
3RAMS PER MILE
CO C02
95
82
89
106
48
56
63
52
19
15
21
14
88
86
30
31
149
139
127
125
67
68
26
26
33
34
26
24
109
72
21
20
83
85
20
19
.5
.2
.6
.0
.9
.8
.0
.8
.7
.9
.2
.3
.7
.8
.6
.5
.0
.5
.5
.5
.5
.1
.1
.1
.9
.9
.6
.9
.2
.5
.1
.4
.1
.2
.6
A
495
509
518
496
437
427
461
447
316
319
332
330
338
339
385
392
338
350
357
370
476
478
482
507
432
432
447
452
461
496
451
457
428
434
491
486
.3
.4
.6
.6
.4
.2
.6
.2
.1
.7
.2
.2
.8
.5
.6
.9
.5
.5
.3
.2
.3
.2
.8
.0
.4
.9
.3
.1
.9
.0
.8
.7
.3
.3
.2
.5
NOXC
0.90
1.03
0.73
0.61
2.03
1.47
1.14
1.79
4.79
4.88
3.02
3.24
0.69
1.02
1.17
1.14
0.41
0.49
0.52
0.53
2.69
2.62
3.41
3.74
3.24
2.83
2.06
2.24
1.35
2.09
1.97
2.12
2.26
2.16
2.93
2.92
MPG
FUEL
ECON
13.5
13.7
13.3
13.2
16.8
16.7
15.5
16.3
25.0
25.1
23.8
24.7
17.9
18.0
19.9
19.6
15.0
15.1
15.4
15.2
14.9
14.9
16.7
15.9
17.3
17.3
17.4
17.3
13.6
14.2
17.2
17.1
15.1
14.9
16.5
16.7
L-37
-------
APPENDIX L.CONT'D
•»
LISTING OF FEDERAL SHORT TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO.
849
850
851
852
855
856
857
860
863
YR MAKE MODL CID
73 PONT STAW 400
AFTER MTCE.
73 DATS B610 108
AFTER MTCE.
73 DATS 240Z 146
AFTER MTCE.
73 HOND CIVI 71
AFTER MTCE.
73 MG CONV 110
AFTER MTCE.
73 PORS 914 102
AFTER MTCE;
73 TOYO STAW 97
AFTER MTCE.
73 SUBA STAW 83
AFTER MTCE.
73 VOLK SEDA 97
AFTER MTCE.
TEST TYPE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE '
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
n.
HC
3
3
1
2
4
4
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
2
1
2
2
2
2
5
4
6
7
3
3
2
1
3
2
2
2
5
5
5
7
.29
.15
.96
.15
.25
.15
.65
.39
.05
.09
.10
.78
.74
.80
.01
.99
.56
.42
.40
.42
:10
.55
.80
.02
.86
.69
.07
.83
.83
.73
.73
.84
.64
.37
.20
.49
RAMS PER MILE
CO C02 NOXC
52
39
16
45
38
38
30
26
23
24
17
15
29
32
32
29
33
34
41
38
24
26
37
39
58
50
35
30
61
46
37
33
38
36
34
33
.1
.5
.5
.2
.3
.3
.2
.4
.4
.6
.9
.4
.3
.2
.2
.8
.2
.0
.7
.9
.8
.8
.4
.6
.9
.2
.9
.8
.5
.4
.8
.6
.3
.1
.2
.6
563
609
671
635
250
250
284
285
314
311
341
349
194
215
200
200
287
286
283
283
310
295
276
289
221
225
260
250
253
248
244
251
258
246
252
250
.6
.1
.2
.9
.7
.1
.2
.0
.0
.4
.5
.9
.6
.0
.8
.0
.5
.1
.3
.6
.7
.6
.6
.9
.7
.7
.3
.5
.6
.9
.2
.1
.9
.1
.0
.6
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.22
.34
.08
.01
.67
.62
.95
.01
.26
.20
.18
.23
.70
.80
.54
.55
.72
.69
.79
.77
.97
.99
.14
.18
.31
.50
.03
.00
.58
f C
.66
f /\
.60
f O
.68
.96
n ll
.91*
1 \
.7'
n O
.72
MPG
FUEL
ECON
13 5
•J • J
13.0
12.6
12.11
27.1
27.lt
26.1
26.6
24.8
24.9
23.6
23.1
36.1
32.7
34.1
35.1
25.5
25.6
24.9
25.2
24.3
25.2
21.9
23-7
27.2
nO 1
2o.i
07 ll
27. i
on \
29.'
24.5
?6 8
C.V . "
Ofl 1|
C\i >
?8 1
fcu •
26.3
27. 8
d 1 *
27-5
6* 1
27.1
fr i
L-38
-------
APPENDIX L.CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL SHORT TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
HO.
864
076
077
078
079
080
081
082
083
YR MAKE MODL CID
73 VOLV 142S 121
AFTER MTCE.
72 AMMO GREM 258
AFTER MTCE.
72 BUIC RIVI 455
AFTER MTCE.
72 CADI DEVI 472
AFTER MTCE.
72 CHEV VEGA 140
AFTER MTCE.
72 CHEV MALI 350
AFTER MTCE.
72 CHEV CHEL 350
AFTER MTCE.
72 CHEV NOVA 307
AFTER MTCE.
72 CHEV IMPA 350
»
AFTER MTCE.
TEST TYPE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
7
7
4
4
24
23
1
1
5
4
4
3
3
3
4
4
2
3
6
4
4
4
2
2
2
2
3
2
5
5
3
3
5
5
5
4
HC
.41
.33
.72
.39
.57
.86
.93
.82
.03
.84
.00
.89
.64
.59
.41
.42
.60
.22
.47
.83
.57
.31
.35
.08
.53
.60
.01
.80
.29
.14
.36
.23
.65
.27
.10
.82
5RAMS PER MILE
CO C02
76
72
62
63
64
62
20
16
77
74
54
50
131
132
190
186
44
45
67
49
92
82
48
34
33
32
19
18
44
46
16
13
90
87
74
70
.2
.8
.3
.2
.3
.2
.5
.9
.5
.8
.1
.2
.0
.2
.5
.9
.0
.1
.1
.0
.6
.9
.0
.7
.3
.4
.9
.6
.3
.3
.9
.8
.5
.1
.9
.8
233
241
244
250
260
262
352
351
518
516
540
543
545
541
549
563
332
331
308
313
359
361
451
455
424
429
443
449
419
418
476
480
486
480
574
494
.5
.2
.3
.5
.0
.5
.3
.0
.3
.0
.1
.5
.5
.2
.7
.1
.8
.5
.2
.6
.2
.4
.5
.5
.2
.3
.9
.1
.2
.9
.0
.1
.6
.8
.9
.3
NOXC
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
4
3
3
3
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
3
2
1
1
1
1
.13
.25
.10
.19
.55
.63
.09
.13
.20
.99
.94
.99
.76
.77
.51
.56
.18
.16
.87
.04
.66
.85
.42
.61
.51
.63
.79
.93
.55
.54
.25
.88
.50
.48
.63
.56
MPG
FUEL
ECON
23.6
23.4
24.9
24.4
20.2
20.4
22.7
23.2
13.5
13.7
13.9
14.0
11.6
11.7
10.3
10.2
21.6
21.5
20.4
21.9
17.1
17.6
16.6
17.2
18.3
18.2
18.3
18.2
17.6
17.5
17.3
17.3
13.7
14.0
12.5
14.3
L-39
-------
APPENDIX L.CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL SHORT TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO.
084
085
086
087
088
089
090
091
092
YR MAKE MODL CID
72 CHEV BELA 400
AFTER MTCE.
72 DODG CORO 318
AFTER MTCE.
72 FORD PINT 122
AFTER MTCE.
72 FORD GRNT 351
AFTER MTCE.
72 FORD MAVE 200
AFTER MTCE.
72 FORD GALA 351
AFTER MTCE.
72 FORD STAW 400
AFTER MTCE.
72 MERC MONG 400
AFTER MTCE.
72 OLDS CUTL 350
AFTER MTCE.
TEST TYPE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
n
HC
5
6
2
3
2
2
3
3
3
3
1
1
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
2
2
2
3
1
2
4
5
2
2
.69
.14
.73
.12
.94
.93
.33
.58
.53
.32
.51
.49
.08
.16
.88
.82
.89
.82
.46
.37
.79
.96
.49
.93
.94
.38
.34
.34
.71
.01
.91
.03
.86
.07
.43
.55
-RAMS PER MILE
CO C02 NOXC
54
56
42
50
21
17
46
56
44
44
23
25
41
44
15
14
43
38
22
20
41
32
51
52
39
33
27
20
20
20
17
24
112
117
50
45
.3
.8
.9
.9
.0
.6
.6
.4
.8
.0
.9
.7
.8
.7
.4
.6
.3
.7
.1
.2
.2
.1
.8
.3
.7
.5
.5
.8
.4
.1
.1
.4
.9
.9
.0
.5
460
467
533
522
422
420
407
387
244
244
269
263
481
472
490
491
286
296
319
319
533
545
571
570
482
490
546
552
537
535
610
601
352
357
438
441
.3
.6
.8
.1
.3
.6
.0
.7
.8
.8
.5
.5
.0
.0
.8
.8
.8
.6
.5
.7
.7
.5
.2
.6
.1
.7
.7
.4
.5
.6
.4
.1
.7
.7
.1
.8
3
3
3
2
3
3
2
2
3
3
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
4
4
2
2
1
1
3
4
3
3
3
2
2
2
0
0
0
0
.18
.44
.03
.77
.54
.67
.84
.36
.56
.48
.61
.68
.81
.77
.42
.59
.15
.50
.29
.20
.05
.18
.37
.38
.89
.15
.40
,,62
.00
_ o
.98
rt ll
.84
f —
.62
.79
rr rt
.79
OR
.80
o n
.89
MPG
FUEL
ECON
15 7
* \ l
15.4
14.6
14.5
19.1
19.1
18.1
18.2
27.2
27.1
28.5
28.8
16.0
16.1
16.9
16.9
24.1
24.2
24.5
24.7
14.6
14.7
. _. I.
13.1
. • A
13.3
15.9
A £ rt
16.0
14.9
1 '
15. j
13*8
n 1
i j. '
16.3
15.9
16.9
| V
11.0
L-AO
-------
ON
APPENDIX L.CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL SHORT TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO.
093
091
095
096
097
098
099
100
396
YR MAKE MODL CID
72 PLYM VALI 225
AFTER MTCE.
72 PLYM FURY 360
AFTER MTCE.
72 PONT CATA 400
AFTER MTCE.
72 PONT LEMA 350
AFTER MTCE.
72 DATS 510 97
AFTER MTCE.
72 TOYO CORO 120
AFTER MTCE.
72 VOLK KARM 97
AFTER MTCE.
72 VOLK KOMB 103
AFTER MTCE.
72 CHEV KING 350
#
AFTER MTCE.
TEST TYPE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
9
8
2
2
5
4
3
3
4
4
4
4
3
3
3
3
2
2
2
3
2
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
4
4
4
4
4
3
3
HC
.66
.82
.66
.83
.27
.96
.06
.08
.05
.05
.53
.36
.64
.76
.46
.39
.85
.97
.66
.14
.56
.32
.20
.18
.87
.18
.46
.08
.70
.10
.57
.87
.71
.71
.92
.83
}RAMS P
CO
146
129
23
31
118
107
36
21
37
40
26
20
53
46
36
36
22
22
23
22
27
24
26
22
34
38
35
37
40
40
25
24
79
75
51
47
.6
.1
.8
.8
.8
.5
.8
.8
.9
.1
.3
.9
.0
.8
.5
.6
.9
.6
.0
.1
.3
.2
.5
.3
.7
.6
.8
.1
.3
.9
.9
.0
.0
.7
.9
.3
ER MILE
C02
215
226
322
319
401
406
461
477
498
491
522
523
480
477
512
516
241
249
246
248
259
264
245
256
230
222
233
227
331
335
320
314
481
488
512
507
.9
.9
.9
.3
.1
.3
.8
.9
.0
.8
.1
.2
.6
.9
.4
.0
.6
.2
.8
.0
.3
.4
.5
.3
.5
.2
.7
.8
.7
.3
.0
.4
.3
.4
.7
.0
NOXC
0
1
2
2
1
2
2
3
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
.89
.14
.44
.14
.89
.07
.73
.05
.37
.49
.37
.68
-43
.48
.34
.35
.78
.86
.49
.51
.38
.28
.34
.48
.31
.06
.16
.08
.20
.22
.40
.29
.44
.58
.10
.20
MPG
FUEL
ECON
18.6
19.4
24.1
23.5
14.7
15.0
16.8
17.0
15.6
15.6
15.4
15.6
15.4
15.8
15.3
15.2
31.0
30.2
30.5
30.3
28.6
28.7
30.2
29.8
30.2
30.3
29.5
30.0
21.8
21.5
23.7
24.1
14.3
14.3
14.6
15.0
L-41
-------
APPENDIX L.CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL SHORT TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO.
398
400
401
404
410
865
874
877
883
YR MAKE MODL CID
72 CHRY NEWP 400
AFTER MTCE.
72 DODG DART 318
AFTER MTCE.
72 FORD PINT 122
AFTER MTCE.
72 FORD LTD 429
AFTER MTCE.
72 PLYM VALI 318
AFTER MTCE.
72 AMMO GREM 232
AFTER MTCE.
72 CHEV VEGA 140
AFTER MTCE.
72 CHEV NOVA 307
AFTER MTCE.
72 CHEV MALI 307
AFTER MTCE.
TEST TYPE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
StaORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
n
HC
4
4
4
4
5
6
4
3
5
5
5
5
6
7
3
3
4
4
3
3
5
5
3
4
2
3
2
2
4
4
3
3
8
7
3
3
.17
.12
.24
.44
.98
.62
.47
.64
.32
.62
.21
.16
.93
.48
.19
.19
.60
.41
.80
.55
.42
.47
.93
.41
.43
.29
.05
.11
.65
.52
.61
.80
.19
.87
.40
.45
RAMS PER MILE
CO C02 NOXC
56
60
44
37
85
88
40
37
34
34
34
32
84
94
24
22
61
57
21
22
52
50
46
68
50
62
26
29
45
44
40
42
83
80
36
34
.9
.7
.0
.6
.4
.1
.3
.8
.1
.6
.5
.5
.2
.6
.7
.6
.4
.6
.7
.7
.8
.4
.7
.8
.0
.6
.0
.6
.6
.8
.2
.2
.5
.8
.3
.0
494
486
492
502
321
311
379
382
294
284
278
287
438
454
531
527
328
330
388
391
288
285
285
278
202
187
228
229
380
392
420
414
326
317
388
392
.3
.2
.8
.0
.4
.7
.7
.0
.9
.8
.1
.0
.4
.5
.8
.2
.3
.5
.9
.9
.4
.9
.7
.4
.3
.7
.5
.7
.3
.1
.4
.1
.3
.3
.2
.1
3
3
2
2
0
0
1
1
2
2
2
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
0
0
0
1
0
2
2
1
1
1
0
1
1
.14
.04
.75
.84
.98
.95
.04
.10
.46
.42
.98
.00
.34
.22
.69
.74
.01
.00
.02
.12
.29
.28
.45
.99
.76
.78
.09
.98
.61
.75
_ j
.51
ii o
.43
.02
r\ rt
.99
nf
.26
1 4
.31
MPG
FUEL
ECON
11,9
i j
11.9
* j
15. it
15.4
18.7
18.8
19.1
19.6
21.3
21.9
25.1
25.0
15.0
11.2
15.3
15.5
20.2
20.1
20.1
20.2
22.8
23.2
23.9
_ _ n
22.2
30.8
_ — A
29.9
M /» 0
32.2
04 ll
31,*
19,0
ifl 6
| 0 i v
17 Q
1 1 •'
18 0
I U i v
18.1
18.9
| W 1 *
19.5
1 / •
19."
i J
L-42
-------
APPENDIX L.CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL SHORT TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO.
885
886
887
889
890
891
891
895
897
YR
72
72
72
72
72
72
72
72
72
MAKE MODL CID
CHEV CHEL 350
AFTER MTCE.
CHEV MONT 350
AFTER MTCE.
CHEV NOVA 350
AFTER MTCE.
CHEV MONT 350
AFTER MTCE.
CHEV NOVA 350
AFTER MTCE.
CHEV MONT 400
AFTER MTCE.
CHRY NEWP MOO
AFTER MTCE.
DODG DART 225
AFTER MTCE.
DODG DART 318
.»
AFTER MTCE.
TEST TYPE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
4
4
2
2
4
4
2
3
4
5
3
3
3
3
2
2
13
12
10
11
5
5
4
4
5
4
6
5
3
3
3
5
6
£
3
3
HC
.11
.13
.42
.41
-43
.44
.95
.07
.75
.24
.68
.85
.85
.93
.16
.07
.46
.87
.70
.48
.74
.73
.30
.28
.20
.84
.15
.42
.66
.39
.59
.04
;74
.60
.12
.06
}RAMS P
CO
55
57
28
24
85
82
26
31
74
84
55
51
72
84
21
22
22
21
81
76
66
60
31
26
114
101
123
116
60
54
54
78
94
93
21
20
.5
.6
.2
.4
.6
.8
.0
.3
.1
.5
.4
.8
.2
.2
.4
.5
.4
.1
.5
.6
.7
.8
.3
.2
.7
.4
.5
.2
.5
.8
.2
.4
.4
.2
.5
.1
ER MILE
C02
401
402
458
461
436
442
457
459
404
400
453
442
428
414
480
470
497
500
512
514
439
435
509
511
423
429
448
445
267
233
271
256
360
368
443
434
.9
.8
.6
.1
.6
.3
.6
.9
.0
.9
.2
.1
.1
.0
.4
.2
.3
.2
.1
.8
.5
.3
.2
.7
.1
.4
.9
.0
.8
.3
.9
.4
.4
.7
.0
.8
NOXC
2.41
2.14
2.18
2.12
1.05
1 .07
1.72
1.61
1.36
1.31
1.16
1.10
2.06
1.64
1.50
1.58
2.19
2.16
1 .20
1.28
1.19
1 .24
0.99
1.08
1.21
1.34
0.94
0.97
1.96
1.62
1.43
0.88
2.32
2.41
2.09
2.09
MPG
FUEL
ECON
17.7
17.5
17.4
17.5
15.2
15.1
17.5
17.1
16.6
16.1
16.1
16.6
16.0
15.9
17.0
17.3
15.4
15.5
13.2
13.2
15.8
16.2
15.5
15.7
14.3
14.7
13.4
13.8
23.7
26.9
24.1
22.4
16.7
16.6
18.2
18.6
L-43
-------
APPENDIX L.CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL SHORT TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO.
898
899
900
901
902
903
•
904
906
907
YR MAKE MODL CID
72 DODG POLA 360
AFTER MTCE.
72 FORD PINT 122
AFTER MTCE.
72 FORD PINT 98
AFTER MTCE.
72 FORD PINT 98
AFTER MTCE.
72 FORD MAVE 200
AFTER MTCE.
72 FORD MUST 351
AFTER MTCE.
72 FORD MAVE 302
AFTER MTCE.
72 FORD MAVE 250
AFTER MTCE.
72 FORD GALA 400
AFTER MTCE.
TEST TYPE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
GRAMS PER MILE
HC CO C02 NOXC
11
12
4
3
3
3
2
2
4
3
3
3
3
3
4
2
3
3
2
2
4
4
4
3
9
10
3
3
7
5
2
2
5
5
2
3
.99
.14
.08
.80
.45
.71
.78
.81
.09
.82
.77
.51
.42
.62
.14
.93
.76
.59
.55
.28
.72
.28
.04
.89
.84
.13
.78
.88
.12
.80
.67
.46
.04
.17
.83
.02
128
126
56
70
33
32
14
17
22
22
23
24
37
40
30
25
91
98
48
49
21
17
38
29
23
33
31
26
81
72
20
21
74
85
39
40
.6
.8
.8
.1
.2
.7
.1
.7
.1
.6
.6
.6
.4
.2
.9
.6
.3
.3
.4
.0
.2
.9
.6
.9
.6
.9
.4
.6
.2
.9
.7
.8
.1
.7
.9
.3
362
370
493
492
249
252
268
268
246
249
253
247
217
214
211
222
305
302
309
312
566
570
676
678
375
368
377
412
269
281
344
305
433
427
511
508
.5
.1
.8
.4
.2
.7
.1
.3
.2
.1
.3
.2
.5
.5
.6
.4
.7
.1
.2
.8
.0
.3
.5
.6
.8
.1
.7
.1
.5
.0
.2
.6
.8
.8
.6
.5
1
1
1
1
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
0
0
0
0
2
2
2
1
2
2
1
1
1
2
3
2
2
2
2
2
.25
.29
.15
.17
.57
.53
.08
.93
.05
.10
.63
.68
.60
.19
,76
.62
.37
.34
.60
.59
.56
.80
.02
.97
.91
.55
.11
.59
.97
.25
.35
n r
.85
.51
ll C
.15
r\ f\
.20
10
. 2
MPG
FUEL
ECON
11 ?
• I
11.6
11.9
14.1
28.1
28.1
29.7
29.1
30.2
29,9
29.1
29.9
30.9
30.7
32.5
32.6
19.2
19.0
22.6
22.1
11.1
11.5
A A 0
11.8
, _ «
12.0
20.0
4 /\ t,
19.b
f\r\ 3
20. £
In fl
y.u
21-2
01 U
21 •*
5o 0
C J'u
95 5
C.J »J
15,7
15,3
1 J *
15.2
1 *' •
15.3
i •*
L-44
-------
APPENDIX L.CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL SHORT TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO.
909
911
912
919
925
929
930
931
932
YR MAKE MODL CID
72 FORD LTD 429
AFTER MTCE.
72 FORD GALA 400
AFTER MTCE.
72 MERC COME 250
AFTER MTCE.
72 PLYM VALI 198
AFTER MTCE.
72 PONT LEMA 350
AFTER MTCE.
72 DATS B1 10 72
AFTER MTCE.
72 DATS 510 97
AFTER MTCE.
72 OPEL 1900 116
AFTER MTCE.
72 TOYO CORO 71
*
AFTER MTCE.
TEST TYPE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
4
4
2
2
4
4
3
3
3
3
3
2
5
4
2
2
4
4
3
3
2
2
1
1
2
2
3
3
2
2
2
2
3
3
2
2
HC
.77
.11
.11
.24
.04
.00
.32
.25
.48'
.99
.28
.77
.18
.22
.35
.29
.66
.69
.20
.55
.19
.51
.75
.75
.89
.79
.40
.50
.31
.20
.44
.50
.16
.18
.23
.01
RAMS P
CO
17
16
16
19
49
54
22
20
55
53
16
23
53
36
13
12
67
69
28
56
19
20
15
14
21
17
25
23
20
17
5
5
35
39
18
17
.3
.9
.2
.9
.4
.2
.1
.7
.3
.5
.2
.6
.4
.6
.0
.1
.7
.1
.6
.3
.9
.2
.7
.3
.2
.7
.0
.1
.7
.8
.2
.0
.9
.1
.6
.5
ER MILE
C02
544
547
555
557
505
497
500
500
331
337
354
360
264
266
298
286
450
444
527
492
211
216
208
207
236
239
232
237
302
290
357
334
264
261
252
235
.8
.9
.2
.7
.4
.7
.7
.0
.3
.1
.7
.0
.8
.8
.0
.6
.6
.4
.3
.6
.9
.5
.9
.1
.1
.5
.8
.9
.6
.5
.1
.7
.7
.7
.3
.8
NOXC
3
3
3
3
1
1
3
3
2
2
3
3
2
2
3
3
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
2
2
2
2
3
3
1
1
1
1
1
1
.76
.79
.26
.18
.77
.65
.40
.91
.57
.57
.23
.06
.38
.84
.41
.02
.53
.51
.53
.09
.94
.00
.09
.19
.00
.02
.81
.87
.51
.59
.79
.77
.17
.08
.17
;12
MPG
FUEL
ECON
15.1
15.1
15.1
14.9
14.9
14.9
16.3
16.4
20.7
20.5
22.7
21.9
24.3
26.3
27.2
28.4
15.5
15.6
15.2
15.0
35.5
34.7
37.1
37.8
31.8
32.1
31.4
31.1
25.9
27.3
23.8
25.3
26.8
26.6
30.7
32.9
L-45
-------
APPENDIX L.CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL SHORT TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO.
933
935
YR MAKE MODL CID
72 TOYO STAW 97
AFTER MTCE.
72 VOLK CONV 97
AFTER MTCE.
TEST TYPE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
SHORT TEST
REPLICATE
3
3
2
3
4
4
4
5
HC
.38
.35
.84
.00
.43
.94
.86
.11
RAMS PER MILE
CO C02 NOXC
42
37
37
36
54
56
51
53
.9
.3
.1
.0
.8
.4
.7
.8
231
240
267
281
290
288
253
251
.6
.9
.9
.1
.7
.0
.9
.8
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
.34
.52
.15
.29
.13
.13
.06
.03
MPG
FUEL
ECON
28.6
28.6
26.5
25.6
22.7
22.6
25.3
25.2
L-46
-------
APPENDIX M
-------
APPENDIX M
LISTING OF TWO SPEED IDLE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
Legend
NO - Vehicle Number
YR - Model Year
MAKE - Vehicle Make
MODL - Vehicle Model
MODE - Portion of Test
2250(N) - Results of test with engine operation
at 2250 RPM and transmission in neutral
REPLICATE - Repeat of 2250(N) portion of test
IDLE(N) - Results of test with engine at normal idle
and transmission in neutral
REPLICATE - Repeat of IDLE(N) portion of test
ACCEPT - Prescreening test conducted upon acceptance of vehicle
from owner
BEFORE MTCE - Test Conducted During the course of Emission Testing
Before Maintenance
MECH REC - Test Conducted by Mechanic Immediately Prior to Performing
Maintenance
MECH QC - Test Performed by Mechanic Immediately Following Maintenance
AFTER MTCE - Test Conducted During the course of Emission Testing
After Maintenance
During the course of the above tests the following items may be read.
HC - Hydrocarbon Concentration, Measured with Garage-type
Instrumentation in Parts per Million Hexane equivalent.
(-: test not performed)
CO - Carbon Monoxide Concentration, Measured with Garage-type
Instrumentation in Mole Per Cent (-: test not performed)
N°x - Oxidea of Nitrogen Concentration, Measured by the Chemilu-
minescence Method in Parts per Million
M-l
-------
APPENDIX M
LISTING OF TWO SPEED IDLE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
NO
001
002
003
004
005
006
007
008
009
ACCEPT BEFORE MTCE MECH REC
YR MAKE MODL MODE HC CO HC CO NOX HC CO
75 CHEV TRUC 2250(N)
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE -
75 CHEV TRUC 2250(N)
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE -
75 CHEV TRUC 2250(N)
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE -
75 CHEV TRUC 2250(N) -
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE -
75 DODG TRUC 2250(N)
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE -
75 FORD TRUC 2250(N) -
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE -
75 FORD TRUC 2250(N) -
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE -
75 FORD TRUC 2250(N) -
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE -
75 FORD TRUC 2250(N) -
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE -
50
50
- 130
- 120
48
90
- 240
- 275
25
50
60
60
10
20
40
30
60
20
80
80
20
10
30
30
- 5
10
15
10
15
20
20
90
- 140
80
85
l3
2.6
2.2
0.5
1 1
6.2
6 3
0.1
0.5
0.0
0.0
0.1
0 0
0 1
0.0
0.0
0.0
1 4
1.5
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 1
0 0
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.3
0.4
0.9
1.0
146 -
106 -
48 -
36 - -
146 -
118 -
53 -
37 -
1$ : :
43 - -
32 -
136 - -
121 -
28 -
38 - -
419 -
378 -
56 -
46 -
79 -
65 -
39 -
39 -
86 -
82 -
46 -
48 -
111 -
106 -
26 -
22 -
116 - -
106 -
30 -
30 -
MECH CK AFTER MICE
HC CO HC CO NOX
— — _ _
_ _ _ _
-
-
— — - -
_ _ _ _
_____
_ _
_
_ - -
-
-
- ~
I
~
— - ~
_ - - ^
- -
TWO SPEED IDLE TEST RESULTS ARE: HC - PPM/HEXANE, CO - %, UNCORRECTED NOX -
M-2
-------
APPENDIX M,CONT'D
LISTING OF TWO SPEED IDLE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
ACCEPT
NO. YR MAKE MODL MODE HC CO
DENVER
BEFORE MTCE
HC CO NOX
MECH REC MECH CK AFTER MTCE
HC CO HC CO HC CO NOX
010 75 CMC
011 75 AMMO
012 75 BUIC
013 75 BUIC
011 75 BUIC
015 75 CADI
016 75 CHEV
°17 75 CHEV
018 75 CHEV
TRUC 2250(N) -
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE -
HORN 2250(N) -
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE -
CNTY 2250(N) -
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE -
RIVI 2250(N) -
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE -
REGA 2250CN) -
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE -
ELDO 2250CN) -
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE -
VEGA 2250 (N) -
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE -
NOVA 2250(N) -
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE -
MONT 2250(N) -
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE -
10
20
30
30
80
70
- 135
- 110
35
80
80
- 110
- 105
- 140
- 190
- 215
55
- 179
- 130
- 165
- 140
- 180
- 505
- 540
25
50
80
- 230
10
25
12
25
55
55
25
20
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.6
1.2
2.3
1.3
1.6
2.0
1.1
1.0
2.1
3-8
2.4
3-1
2.2
8.5
1.7
1.9
3.6
6.2
4.0
4.6
0.1
0.1
3-5
4.8
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.9
1.5
0.1
0.0
116
88
43
38
552
501
154
123
78
67
34
27
83
47
45
28
106
55
38
28
151
121
52
40
276
239
12
45
212
307
86
90
103
85
75
^75
™
-
80
—
120
-
40
—
90
110
—
270
-
60
-
200
-
200
-
560
-
100
-
290
30
90
140
-
340
•~
-
0.6
—
0.5
-
0.3
—
0.1
-
0.5
—
3-2
0.6
-
2.4
-
2.2
-
3-0
0.3
—
4.2
0.1
0.1
1.1
-
0.2
-
-
90
-
120
-
20
—
15
-
100
—
100
—
30
—
40
-
60
-
210
-
40
—
60
30
85
100
-
90
-
-
0.6
-
0.1
-
0.1
-
0.0
-
0.2
—
0.2
—
0.3
-
0.1
-
2.0
-
0.4
—
0.0
—
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.4
—
0.0
-
-
50
90
65
85
3°
80
80
130
135
160
40
130
80
110
70
40
120
250
380
800
15
10
20
150
15
25
20
20
50
125
85
-
-
1-3
1.8
0.2
0.4
1.1
2.2
0.9
1.5
4.2
5.4
0.1
1.2
2.8
4.9
1.0
0.1
3.6
5.5
1.2
2.0
0.0
0.1
0.1
2.5
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.8
1^
.5
0.0
0.1
-
-
450
409
126
146
40
72
28
37
70
67
41
47
106
59
36
63
136
128
28
79
181
*\f\f\
209
60
18
237
327
64
74
78
84
E
SpEED IDLE TEST RESULTS ARE: HC - PPM/HEXANE, CO - *, UNCORRECTED NOX - PPM
M-3
-------
APPENDIX M,CONT'D
LISTING OF TWO SPEED IDLE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
NO.
019
020
021
022
023
024
025
026
027
ACCEPT BEFORE MTCE
YR MAKE MODL MODE HC CO HC CO NOX
75 CHEV CAPR 2250(N) -
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE -
75 CHEV IMPA 2250(N) -
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE -
75 CHEV STAW 2250(N) -
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE -
75 CHRY NEWP 2250(N) -
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE -
75 DODG CORO 2250(N) -
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE -
75 DODG DART 2250(N) -
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE -
75 FORD MUST 2250(N) -
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE -
75 FORD TORI 2250(N) -
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE -
75 FORD GRAN 2250(N) -
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE -
- 185
- 135
60
35
120
60
35
25
15
20
- 45
15
40
35
55
40
40
- 100
- 210
- 230
- 260
- 350
- 390
- 380
75
30
75
30
15
15
- 45
40
30
20
25
15
4.9
3-3
0.1
0.1
2.4
1.8
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.7
4.4
4.7
0.6
0.8
7-3
6.7
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
80
81
10
30
65
56
70
66
123
146
51
65
237
227
49
48
655
75
34
15
204
219
37
37
i?
62
40
72
72
46
41
146
146
51
19
MECH
HC
40
—
70
—
50
-
30
40
-
60
—
120
—
90
-
320
—
140
-
750
440
40
30
10
-
40
_
30
35
REC
CO
0.3
—
0.1
—
1.2
-
0.1
0.0
-
0.0
-
0.0
-
0.1
-
4.4
-
0.5
-
1.8
-
7.6
0.0
0.0
-
0.2
-
0.1
_
0.0
-
0.0
-
MECH
HC
30
35
40
-
30
40
-
55
-
50
-
140
-
190
-
80
-
175
-
70
45
50
-
10
-
60
—
30
—
30
-
CK
CO
0.2
-
0.0
-
0.1
-
0.0
0.0
-
0.0
—
1.5
—
0.3
-
0.9
—
0.1
-
0.4
-
0.0
0.0
0.0
—
0.2
—
0.5
—
0.0
*"
0.0
"~
AFTER tfTCE
HC CO NOX
110
180
40
70
30
60
15
20
20
10
45
25
30
30
30
20
20
130
20
15
25
60
20
55
30
30
28
OA
30
15
4 A
10
40
2.)
20
2o
20
2U
2-3
3-6
0.1
0.1
1.0
1.9
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.3
1.7
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.9
0.1
0.1
0.0
Of\
.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.1
n 1
U. I
0.2
U.
o.n
0 3
u« J
0*0
U • v
o'.o
v • *•
106
1 v/U
91
101
103
18
18
70
68
88
96
15
16
103
98
19
1?
389
4 At
196
51
rrt
50
232
ooo
Of.
91
61
51
12
37
Ji
106
111
I
I
\\f\
4U
38
TWO SPEED IDLE TEST RESULTS ARE: HC - PPM/HEXANE, CO - $, UNCORRECTED NOX - P
M-4
-------
APPENDIX M,CONT'D
LISTING OF TWO SPEED IDLE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
NO. YB MAKE
028 75 FORD
029 75 FORD
030 75 MERC
031 75 MERC
032 75 OLDS
033 75 OLDS
034 75 OLDS
°35 75 PLYM
°36 75 PLYM
ACCEPT BEFORE MTCE
MODL MODE HC CO HC CO NOX
LTD 2250(N) -
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE -
LTD 2250(N) -
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE -
MARQ 2250CN) -
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE -
MONG 2250CN) -
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE -
DELT 2250(N)
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE -
CUTL 2250(N) -
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE -
DELT 2250(N) -
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE -
FURY 2250(N) -
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE -
DUST 2250(N) -
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE -
25
30
60
50
20
30
40
50
55
72
- 120
- 135
30
4o
110
140
- 140
- 130
- 440
- 430
- 160
- 160
50
60
20
60
30
50
30
15
25
15
- 250
- 250
80
- 120
0.5
0.1
0.6
0.0
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
2.1
1.5
0.8
1-3
0.6
0.7
0.4
0.5
0.7
0.7
4.3
4.5
0.9
1.3
0.1
0.1
0.0
1.5
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.2
0.4
0.5
1.6
2.5
56
64
39
48
54
106
44
42
90
89
63
62
58
48
42
38
64
65
45
42
42
62
58
56
141
108
56
45
154
189
36
35
307
409
106
€0
MECH REC
HC CO
40
80
-
120
-
30
60
—
120
-
60
180
-
100
-
270
-
300
-
100
-
140
-
180
-
100
-
140
-
75
375
0.4
0.4
-
0.3
0.5
-
1.0
—
1.2
-
0.4
0.5
-
0.7
-
3-0
0.2
-
0.1
-
0.2
-
0.1
-
0.5
-
0.7
-
2.0
0.3
MECH CK
HC CO
50
105
-
90
-
30
40
—
45
-
40
50
-
50
-
60
—
70
—
60
-
150
-
170
-
90
-
65
-
40
300
0.3
0.1
-
0.1
-
0.4
-
0.2
—
0.1
-
0.3
0.3
0.0
—
0.0
—
0.1
—
0.0
—
0.1
-
0.0
—
0.6
—
0.0
-
0.1
0.1
AFTER MTCE
HC CO NOX
20
35
50
75
30
18
48
30
10
20
25
25
15
30
28
40
60
185
40
95
150
180
40
55
20
50
30
40
30
25
15
20
270
320
110
100
0.6
0.8
0.2
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.2
0.4
0.5
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.6
0.8
0.7
1.0
0.6
1.7
0.0
0.0
1.0
2.1
0.0
0.0
0.1
2.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.7
0.5
1-9
0.6
70
60
56
50
82
44
44
38
64
76
72
78
47
43
48
48
28
28
11
80
42
f /fc
62
68
_. /•
56
101
n It /N
149
68
f \\
64
138
rjf\
70
66
Qn
00
327
307
95
95
spEED IDLE TEST RESULTS ARE: HC - PPM/HEXANE, CO - %, UNCORRECTED NOX - PPM
M-5
-------
APPENDIX M.CONT'D
LISTING OF TWO SPEED IDLE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
NO.
037
038
039
040
041
042
043
044
045
ACCEPT BEFORE MTCE
YR MAKE MODL MODE HC CO HC CO NOX
75 PONT CATA 2250(N) -
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE -
75 PONT LEMA 2250(N)
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE -
75 PONT GRNV 2250(N) -
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE -
76 CAPR SEDA 2250(N)
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE -
75 DATS B210 2250(N)
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE -
75 HOND SEDA 2250(N)
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE -
75 TOYO CORO 2250(N) -
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE -
75 VOLK SEDA 2250(N) -
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE -
75 VOLK STAW 2250(N) -
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE -
10
45
45
50
25
50
- 300
- 310
10
10
90
50
10
- 260
10
- 270
55
35
- 150
- 120
- 65
60
40
- 120
15
25
40
50
- 160
- 200
- 200
- 240
25
40
25
35
0.0
0.3
0.0
0.2
0.8
1.3
1-3
0.6
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.0
8.9
0.0
7.4
0.6
0.7
2.0
2.1
1-7
1.4
1.6
1.3
0.6
0.6
1.0
1.0
3-2
3.4
5.8
6.0
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
212
176
63
53
14
10
6
12
131
146
72
74
60
79
40
60
184
133
31
38
22
30
24
30
45
63
28
38
219
250
11
60
52
45
40
MECH
HC
100
180
-
70
—
460
-
50
-
100
-
270
-
350
-
90
220
-
140
-
220
-
40
-
70
150
-
160
50
45
-
REG
CO
0.1
1.0
-
0.9
0.4
-
0.0
-
0.0
-
7.5
8.5
-
0.3
0.8
-
1.7
2.3
0.8
-
1.4
-
2.2
-
4.0
0.0
_
0.0
-
MECH
HC
60
100
-
30
30
10
-
30
20
-
50
-
90
-
220
-
150
-
80
-
60
-
120
-
130
_
150
60
-
70
-
CK
CO
0.0
0.0
-
0.2
-
0.0
-
0.1
-
0.0
-
0.0
-
0.0
-
0.3
—
0.8
-
0.7
-
2.1
-
0.6
-
0.4
—
1.5
-
3-2
0.0
—
0.0
—
AFTER MICE
HC CO NOX
20
5
40
30
30
30
25
30
50
25
200
230
10
400
40
200
55
45
155
140
70
65
225
195
10
f f\
60
100
. >/*
160
115
rtA
90
170
170
25
1 C
ID
35
20
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.5
0.8
0.1
0.1
0.0
8.8
0.0
2.8
1.2
1.1
2.8
A f
2.6
1.4
1M
.3
0.9
OA
.9
0.6
0£
.0
0.5
00
.j
2.3
'•
4.6
5-0
0.1
n o
V" W
0.1
0 0
V* v
128
161
72
M
136
i JW
196
68
58
84
73
42
44
I6
82
42
34
111
• ft
98
a
28
32
oc
S3
8
1H
68
f>?
Ut
52
SO
JV
186
101
71
101
82
56
53
TWO SPEED IDLE TEST RESULTS ARE: HC - PPM/HEXANE, CO - %, UNCORRECTED NOX -
M-6
-------
APPENDIX M,CONT'D
LISTING OF TWO SPEED IDLE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
NO YR
n\ 75
C j • \J
232 75
23375
23175
23575
23675
23875
21075
21175
MAKE MODL MODE
AMMO GREM 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
AMMO HORN 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
AMMO MATA 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
BUIC SKYH 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
BUIC SKYL 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
BUIC REGA 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
BUIC STAW 2250CN)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
BUIC RIVI 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
CADI SEVI 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
ACCEPT BEFORE MTCE
HC CO HC CO NOX
50
80
- 180
- 180
30
20
40
40
40
- - 45
25
32
75
- 135
20
- 125
- 192
- 300
- 395
- 450
- 140
- 130
- 150
- 160
- 160
- 170
- 190
- 160
- 240
- 110
- 160
- 130
35 0.0 -
80 0.0 -
1.5
2.2
4.6
4.2
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.9
1.7
0.1
1.5
2.9
7-5
1 3
3".b
5.0
5-4
2.2
3-0
W
3:1
3.8
6.3
3.2
6.7
_
-
—
—
348
266
75
70
UJ
266
4Z
56
450
389
ft
64
68
80
75
45
171
92
89
66
89
80
60
51
11
11
101
3
68
2
^
-
^m
•^
MECH REC
HC CO
70
-
210
-
35
60
—
30
50
-
90
80
-
150
—
230
-
65
-
150
-
70
150
50
50
-
^m
-
—
-
0.8
-
4.0
-
0.0
-
0.0
-
0.0
-
0.0
-
0.2
-
0.1
-
1.2
—
0.1
-
0.5
-
0.6
-
0.6
0.7
0.4
0.0
-
^
—
_
-
MECH CK
HC CO
50
-
150
30
70
-
30
50
95
70
-
150
—
240
-
70
—
35
—
50
40
50
60
-
_
—
_
-
0.4
-
1.1
-
0.0
-
0.0
-
0.0
-
0.0
—
0.2
-
0.1
—
0.5
—
0.1
—
1.3
—
0.1
—
0.3
0.0
0.4
0.0
—
_
~
_
—
AFTER MTCE
HC CO NOX
35
65
135
125
45
15
70
40
100
40
60
20
20
90
15
40
130
180
60
20
70
120
25
90
110
200
40
52
95
140
35
125
—
~
-
—
1.6
4.3
2.4
2.6
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
1.3
0.1
0.4
1.1
3.8
0.1
0.0
1.9
4.8
0.1
1.1
3.7
7.0
2-5
3.6
1.7
5.0
0.1
3x%
.2
-
~
-
™
181
106
74
60
118
151
63
63
430
532
52
68
121
70
78
32
108
_ - s
116
103
4Jt
0
113
8TF
6
72
50
8
80
36
53
57
121
67
11
49
-
-
~
SPEED IDLE TEST RESULTS ARE: HC - PPM/HEXANE, CO - %, UNCORRECTED NOX - PPM
M-7
-------
APPENDIX M.CONT'D
LISTING OF TWO SPEED IDLE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
NO. YR MAKE
242 75 CADI
243 75 CADI
244 75 CHEV
245 75 CHEV
246 75 CHEV
247 75 CHEV
248 75 CHEV
249 75 CHEV
250 75 CHEV
ACCEPT BEFORE MTCE
MODL MODE HC CO HC CO NOX
DEVI 2250(N) 30
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N) 30
REPLICATE -
FLEE 2250(N) 150
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N) 160
REPLICATE -
VEGA 2250(N) -
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE -
MONZ 2250(N)
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE -
MONZ 2250(N) -
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE -
NOVA 2250(N) -
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE -
NOVA 2250CN) -
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE -
CAMA 2250(N) -
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE -
NOVA 2250CN) -
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE -
0.4 -
0.1 -
5.0 -
0.1 -
-
- 160
- 205
- 250
- 320
- 225
- 240
- 205
- 220
20
15
30
15
10
90
20
- 125
50
40
45
35
- 115
- 220
35
- 225
- 110
- 120
- 245
- 250
-
-
5.1
6.5
6.4
8.2
5.4
6.4
3-7
4.4
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.0
1.9
0.1
2.5
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
3-3
5.8
0.0
3-3
3.1
4.0
5 6
5!8
-
-
143
78
61
28
126
72
50
34
83
77
72
61
327
307
72
58
72
73
77
79
118
93
40
56
Q2
O Q
oo
41
42
MECH
HC
-
-
220
-
270
-
130
170
-
45
50
40
-
50
190
-
180
-
160
-
140
-
130
260
REC
CO
_
3.2
4.0
-
2.4
-
1.3
0.0
-
0.0
-
0.1
-
0.0
-
0.4
-
0.2
-
1.7
0.1
-
2.0
4.8
-
MECH
HC
-
-
90
60
-
120
-
150
30
25
-
20
-
40
-
90
-
70
130
-
135
120
90
CK
CO
-
-
1.5
-
0.1
-
2.2
-
0.3
0.0
-
0.0
-
0.1
-
0.1
-
0.1
-
0.0
-
1.5
-
0.0
—
1.5
0.3
—
AFTER MTCE
HC CO NOX
-
-
120
110
110
150
155
200
25
100
30
15
25
10
20
5
10
10
35
15
30
10
115
It n
10
35
/sr~
25
1°
80
1!K
65
-
-
3-3
3-7
0.6
2.1
3-3
5.0
0.0
0.5
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Of\
.0
o.o
On
.0
a'fi
j.o
0.1
n 1
I), l
2.1
3-3
1.2
n 9
U>7
-
-
169
176
32
58
186
91
85
92
81
92
f>f
96
199
2 DC
ob
17
nf.
20
69
01
01
n
Ul
103
103
I vj
63
72
1
1
TWO SPEED IDLE TEST RESULTS ARE: HC - PPM/HEXANE, CO - %, UNCORRECTED NOX -
M-8
-------
APPENDIX M,CONT'D
LISTING OF TWO SPEED IDLE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
NO. YR MAKE
252 75 CHEV
253 75 CHEV
251 75 CHEV
255 75 CHEV
256 75 CHEV
257 75 CHEV
258 75 CHEV
259 75 CHEV
260 75 CHEV
MODL MODE
MALI 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
MALI 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
MALI 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
STAW 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
MONT 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
MONT 2250CN)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
CAPR 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
IMPA 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
IMPA 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
ACCEPT
HC CO
—
—
-
—
-
—
-
150
-
40
-
85
-
50
-
30
40
-
0
-
10
-
150
270
-
45
55
50
180
-
_
^
-
—
-
—
-
4.5
-
0.1
-
1.3
0.0
-
0.0
-
0.0
-
0.0
-
0.0
-
3-0
5.0
-
0.3
0.0
1.7
4.5
BEFORE MTCE
HC CO NOX
75
90
100
165
40
30
15
10
_
-
—
-
—
-
_
-
—
-
—
-
^m
-
—
-
35
40
80
80
_
-
_
_
15
20
45
65
2.6
4.2
1.8
3.1
1.0
1.1
0.1
0.0
_
-
—
-
—
-
—
-
—
-
^
-
^
-
^
-
1.0
1.3
1.5
1.5
_
-
_
0.9
0.9
1.0
0.9
69
64
73
39
58
58
96
92
_
-
M
-
—
-
_
-
—
-
—
-
^m
-
—
-
81
70
46
38
_
-
_
84
74
50
34
MECH REC
HC CO
120 1.5
150 0.9
- -
80 0.2
- -
125 0.1
- -
_ _
- -
_ _
- -
_ _
- -
_ _
- -
— —
- -
M> «
- -
^ ^
- -
•V ^
- -
115 1.8
- -
230 3-2
-
_
- -
_ _
70 1.4
240 3.6
MECH CK
HC CO
100 1.5
5 0.0
- -
70 0.1
- -
90 0.0
- -
_ _
- -
_ _
- -
v _
- -
M mm
- -
— ^
- -
— ^
- -
^m ^
- -
— ^
-
20 0.0
-
50 0.3
_
-
_ _
60 0.7
170 0.1
AFTER MTCE
HC CO NOX
50
50
30
15
15
15
15
5
_
-
_
-
_
-
_
-
—
-
—
-
^
-
^
-
15
30
20
30
-
_
35
80
40
40
1.8
2.5
0.1
0.0
0.5
0.8
0.0
0.0
_
—
^
-
^
-
„
-
—
-
^
-
M
-
^
-
0.6
1.0
0.4
0.5
-
_
1.6
2.7
0.0
0.0
45
84
86
89
30
58
91
99
_
-
..
-
_
-
..
-
—
-
^
-
_
-
^m
-
88
60
48
50
-
_
85
86
54
56
spEED IDLE TEST RESULTS ARE: HC - PPM/HEXANE, CO - %, UNCORRECTED NOX - PPM
M-9
-------
APPENDIX M.CONT'D
LISTING OF TWO SPEED IDLE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
NO YR
261 75
262 75
263 75
264 75
265 75
266 75
267 75
268 75
270 75
MAKE MODL MODE
CHEV IMPA 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
CHEV IMPA 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
CHEV CAPR 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
CHEV IMPA 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
CHEV CAPR 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
CHEV CAPR 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
CHRY CORD 2250CN)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
CHRY IMPE 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
DODG DART 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
ACCEPT BEFORE MTCE
HC CO HC CO NOX
100
—
230
—
235
340
-
—
-
—
-
—
-
—
-
25
-
30
••»
-
^
-
•«•
-
;
500
-
350
•H
-
M»
-
2.4 105
- 150
4.5 195
- 250
6.0 115
145
5.8 215
- 270
20
20
25
15
10
25
50
35
0.0 -
- -
0.0 -
- -
5
5
10
10
- 150
100
- 170
- 170
5.5 20
80
8.5 210
- 2000
42
- 120
- 145
- 175
3-3
4.2
4.8
5.7
2.9
3-7
3-5
3.8
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
—
-
••
-
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
2.0
2.1
4-7
4.6
0.0
0.1
6.2
5.2
0.1
1.0
2.0
1.9
80
55
46
22
94
63
47
20
146
138
40
43
171
97
40
34
_
-
M
-
98
97
42
45
358
327
62
60
389
307
45
15
207
307
42
46
MECH
HC
50
—
200
—
120
-
285
-
10
-
0
-
150
-
130
-
_
-
—
-
30
20
-
60
-
140
120
-
1800
-
100
—
220
-
REG
CO
0.6
—
6.4
—
3.0
6.0
-
0.0
-
0.0
-
0.1
-
0.4
-
_
-
w*
-
0.0
-
0.0
-
0.4
-
2.7
0.1
-
4.0
-
0.1
-
1.3
MECH
HC
100
—
200
—
90
180
-
10
-
0
-
100
-
40
-
_
-
—
-
30
20
-
60
-
50
20
-
30
80
-
200
-
CK
CO
1.2
-
0.1
-
1.2
-
0.0
-
0.0
-
0.0
-
0.0
-
0.0
-
_
-
_
-
0.0
-
0.0
—
0.0
-
0.0
0.1
—
0.0
—
0.0
—
0.9
—
AFTER MICE
HC CO NOX
30
95
35
60
80
90
25
30
15
5
30
25
10
10
40
30
_
—
_
-
10
10
10
20
90
40
80
60
10
*%rt
30
15
f"t\
60
8
nc
35
90
QC
oo
1.6
2.6
0.0
0.0
2.7
2.9
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
-
—
-
—
0.1
Oil
.1
0*
.1
1 t
1.2
0.4
0.4
0.1
n Q
U.7
n'o
U.7
o.o
n 1
y. i
'•1
0 7
V* I
80
vU
82
78
I «
72
74
i *
72
60
64
154
181
45
50
111
143
41
51
-
—
-
—
inR
I DO
46
4i
^
41
33
255
f~j*
p
373
3J
20
TWO SPEED IDLE TEST RESULTS ARE: HC - PPM/HEXANE, CO - *, UNCORRECTED NOX -
M-10
-------
APPENDIX M.CONT'D
LISTING OF TWO SPEED IDLE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
ACCEPT
NO. YR MAKE MODL MODE HC CO
BEFORE MTCE MECH REC MECH CK
HC CO NOX HC CO HC CO
AFTER MTCE
HC CO NOX
272 75 DODG
u f <-* i ^
273 75 DODG
275 75 FORD
276 75 FORD
277 75 FORD
281 75 FORD
282 75 FORD
283 75 FORD
281* 75 FORD
CHAR 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
MONA 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
MUST 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
PINT 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
MUST 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
GRAN 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
STAW 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
TORI 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
TORI 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
70
90
- 160
- - 185
55
50
- 275
- 300
15
10
50
40
40 1.0 -
- - -
60 0.9 -
_ _ _
15
10
25
17
28
70
180
- 3^0
: : ig
50
35
80 4.5 -
_ _ _
100 0.7 -
10
35
20
40
2.1
1.8
4.1
4.4
2.8
3.1
8.0
8.2
0.5
0.5
0.2
0.3
—
-
_
-
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.1
?•§
4.8
0.5
0.7
0.5
0.8
_
-
_
_
0.3
0.9
2.4
1.3
327
286
72
62
I6
181
31
36
50
71
\\
_
-
_
-
46
62
28
38
227
176
18
65
58
57
50
_
-
_
_
81
111
S?
120
-
200
-
70
215
-
50
-
80
_
-
_
-
80
-
70
25
280
40
110
-
_
-
_
_
40
-
25
1.3
-
4.1
-
2.3
7.2
-
0.4
-
0.5
_
-
_
-
0.0
-
0.0
-
0.1
5.2
0.4
0.4
-
.
-
_
_
0.1
0.6
60
—
110
-
60
-
110
-
60
-
50
v
-
M
-
50
140
-
30
130
20
30
_
-
_
_
20
15
0.1
—
1.5
-
2.3
0.3
0.2
-
0.8
M
-
_
-
0.1
-
0.1
-
0.0
0.0
0.4
0.2
-
-
_
0.1
0.2
55
20
90
60
10
25
15
25
15
30
40
45
_
-
—
-
25
23
98
35
30
40
§5
80
20
130
50
60
-
_
15
20
20
35
1.5
1.1
2.5
2.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
_
-
^
-
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.6
3.6
0.5
3.8
-
_
0.3
0.5
0.4
0.4
222
80
37
39
389
266
69
30
50
62
40
49
_
-
—
-
126
65
72
58
,n
n
56
46
54
36
-
_
55
62
58
52
180 SPEED
IDLE TEST RESULTS ARE: HC - PPM/HEXANE, CO - %, UNCORRECTED NOX - PPM
M-ll
-------
APPENDIX M,CONT'D
LISTING OF TWO SPEED IDLE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
NO.
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
YR MAKE MODL MODE
75 FORD LTD 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
75 FORD ELIT 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
75 FORD LTD 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
75 FORD TORI 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
75 FORD LTD 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
75 FORD LTD 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
75 FORD LTD 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
75 FORD LTD 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
75 FORD LTD 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
ACCEPT BEFORE MTCE
HC CO HC CO NOX
-
—
_
-
_
-
—
-
-
156
-
250
-
_
-
—
-
—
-
_
75
-
70
45
-
70
_
_
_
-
90
- 150
190
- 200
60
75
- 85
90
15
20
: IB
4.2 "95
- 135
7.0 290
- 280
- 130
- 185
- 580
- 800
20
20
50
45
3-6 -
0.5 -
0.7 -
1.1 -
— —
20
15
70
75
2.0
3-0
4.4
3.5
3.3
1.7
1.2
0.6
0.5
0.7
0.6
4.3
6.2
8.8
9.0
8.7
9.4
10.0
10.0
0.8
0.7
1.1
0.8
—
-
—
-
_
-
—
-
0.5
0.7
2.1
3.8
111
106
60
58
131
131
23
82
91
54
46
44
84
70
38
36
62
62
18
16
47
51
38
_
-
^
-
M
-
«•
—
106
108
34
29
MECH
HC
100
230
-
100
-
130
40
-
55
190
-
700
-
155
350
40
-
100
_
-
—
-
—
-
^
—
20
_
60
-
REG
CO
1.5
3.5
3.0
1.0
-
0.1
-
0.4
3-0
9.2
4.8
-
8.0
-
0.4
-
0.5
—
-
—
-
«.
-
•»
-
0.4
_
2.4
-
MECH
HC
40
100
—
10
-
30
20
-
30
80
-
120
-
40
-
50
-
50
90
_
-
_
-
_
-
—
-
20
_
30
CK
CO
0.4
0.5
0.1
-
0.1
-
0.4
-
0.5
2.5
-
0.5
-
0.3
0.2
-
0.5
-
0.7
_
—
_
—
-
—
_
-
0.2
-
0.1
—
AFTER MICE
HC CO NOX
20
130
140
250
10
10
20
20
10
25
25
35
70
100
110
110
15
20
25
30
10
10
20
15
-
— •
-
—
-
—
-
••
18
4 O
12
30
/5C
25
0.5
4.8
1.1
7.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.4
0.5
0.6
2.8
3-6
1.0
1.8
0.5
0.6
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.6
0.7
-
-
-
-
0.4
U.->
0.5
o 9
U* 7
60
72
1
113
95
90
72
62
56
8
88
95
60
70
51
50
§
48
'8
5b
151
52
-
-
"
*
$
i
TWO SPEED IDLE TEST RESULTS ARE: HC - PPM/HEXANE, CO - *, UNCORRECTED NOX -
M-12
-------
APPENDIX M,CONT'D
LISTING OF TWO SPEED IDLE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
ACCEPT
N0. YR MAKE MODL MODE
294 75 LING CONT 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
295 75 MERC MONA 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
297 75 MERC MONT 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
298 75 MERC COUG 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
300 75 OLDS OMEG 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
301 75 OLDS CUTL 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
302 75 OLDS CUTL 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
3°3 75 OLDS STAW 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
3011 75 OLDS CUTL 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
HC
_
-
_
-
_
-
—
-
_
-
—
-
_
—
—
-
_
-
-
80
-
250
-
90
40
-
200
-
810
-
10
15
CO
—
-
—
-
—
-
^m
-
—
-
—
-
—
-
—
-
—
-
-
0.2
-
0.6
-
2.3
0.0
-
0.1
-
6.6
-
0.0
0.0
_
BEFORE MTCE
HC
10
10
40
35
30
10
40
20
20
15
60
40
5
20
15
50
55
150
30
60
^m
-
^m
-
^
-
^
-
60
150
960
1000
-
_
_
CO
0.8
1.1
1.1
1.7
0.0
0.6
0.0
1.4
0.5
0.6
0.8
1.0
0.1
0.4
0.3
0.8
0.5
2.7
0.0
0.0
^
-
—
-
^m
-
—
-
1.1
1.0
8.0
7-9
-
_
_
NOX
62
67
46
49
151
126
61
36
62
58
43
40
87
116
33
39
99
90
96
133
—
-
^
-
_
-
—
-
106
123
17
9
-
_
MECH REC
HC
30
40
-
60
-
240
-
50
-
120
-
30
50
110
-
80
—
-
^m
-
—
-
—
-
65
810
—
-
_
_
CO
0.3
0.2
-
0.0
-
1.2
-
0.4
-
0.5
0.3
0.4
-
0.4
-
0.0
_
-
^^
-
_
-
^
-
0.1
-
6.8
_
-
_
MECH CK
HC
20
-
30
35
90
30
50
30
50
105
-
85
—
-
•^
-
_
-
n
-
30
100
_
-
_
CO
0.3
0.3
0.0
-
0.0
-
0.4
-
0.4
-
0.2
-
0.1
-
0.4
-
0.0
^
-
^m
-
_
-
^m
-
0.1
-
0.0
—
-
_
AFTER MTCE
HC
10
10
45
35
25
40
50
60
20
20
40
40
10
20
90
70
110
130
2°
40
—
-
^m
-
_
-
^m
-
60
50
25
15
-
_
CO
0.4
0.6
0.6
1.3
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.4
0.5
0.3
0.6
0.2
0.2
0.1
0.1
1.2
2.7
0.1
0.1
LM_
-
m m
-
_
-
^m
—
0.9
1.6
0.3
0.0
-
_
NOX
71
72
49
47
151
111
60
48
18
61
16
54
103
95
70
77
141
128
68
82
—
-
^m
-
_
-
^
—
44
86
49
57
-
_
^EED IDLE TEST RESULTS ARE: HC - PPM/HEXANE, CO - %, UNCORRECTED NOX - PPM
M-13
-------
APPENDIX M,CONT'D
LISTING OF TWO SPEED IDLE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
NO.
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
TWO
YR MAKE MODL MODE
75 OLDS STAW 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
75 OLDS DELT 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
75 PLYM DUST 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
75 PLYM SCAM 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
75 PLYM VALI 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
75 PLYM FURY 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
75 PLYM FURY 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
75 PLYM FURY 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
75 PLYM FURY 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
ACCEPT
HC CO
90 0.1
80 0.1
40 0.3
30 0.0
- -
300 3-2
- -
400 6.2
- -
• ••
- -
_ M
- -
200 5.0
-
225 6.0
-
80 1.5
- -
435 9.0
» *M
-
• ^
-/
- -
-
- -
.
- -
SPEED IDLE TEST RESULTS ARE: HC
BEFORE MTCE
HC CO NOX
-
-
90
190
160
180
70
30
20
10
125
210
200
200
70
80
430
340
70
270
170
165
40
70
170
210
30
40
240
210
-
-
0.4
0.5
4.2
4.4
1.0
0.9
0.1
0.1
3.9
5.2
8.2
8.4
0.6
0.5
5.8
5.4
1.4
1.0
4.3
4.0
1.4
1.6
3.3
4.1
0.1
0.1
4.8
5.4
-
—
90
121
48
50
164
95
58
82
348
239
60
60
286
307
24
75
327
389
42
59
m
59
57
m
44
46
- PPM/HEXANE,
MECH RBC
HC CO
-
-
170
-
160
-
90
175
140
-
120
-
50
600
45
170
-
90
260
90
250
-
CO -
-
-
0.5
-
3-5
0.4
-
0.2
-
1.2
-
1.6
-
0.8
-
10.0
0.1
-
3.8
2.2
5.0
1.7
5.0
MECH
HC
-
-
30
30
60
-
70
-
30
165
-
20
-
70
10
-
35
-
20
110
50
40
—
etc
CO
-
-
0.0
-
0.0
-
0.9
0.3
-
0.0
-
0.3
0.0
-
0.1
0.0
-
0.3
—
0.5
0.0
0.2
0.0
*
%, UNCORRECTED
AFTEH MICE
HC CO flox
-
-
30
120
§5
80
20
70
20
30
35
145
110
155
25
50
20
30
95
1ii/\
40
95
14 A
10
60
50
175
170
15
20
25
70
I"
NOX-
-
-
0.3 186
1.1 191
1 1 96
U 86
0.2 15
2.0 11
0.1 8T
0.1 10
1.8 36
3.0 30T
2.2 J9
T! A I'll
2.8 61
8§? &
0.7 '5i
0.1 '8
0.1 50
1.6 2g
1 Q 2w
i • /
1-? I
"> \ r
t> J
1 5 27l>
2J 219
2-9 !!
3.0 51
rtrt
o.i »
0.2 1Q1
oi %
PI*
M-14
-------
APPENDIX M,CONT'D
LISTING OF TWO SPEED IDLE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
ACCEPT
NO. YR MAKE MODL MODE HC CO
BEFORE MTCE MECH REC MECH CK
HC CO NOX HC CO HC CO
AFTER MTCE
HC CO NOX
5 75 PONT AST R 2250(N)
J REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
316 75 PONT LEMA 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
317 75 PONT VENT 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
318 75 PONT LEMA 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
319 75 PONT CATA 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
320 75 PONT STAW 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
321 75 PONT GRNV 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
322 75 AUDI FOX 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
323 ?6 CAPR GHIA 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLIGATE
_
-
^
-
60
-
100
-
60
-
70
^
-
^
-
30
50
_
-
-
-
-
-
-
— ,
^
- 200
- 280
- 205
- 290
1.4 180
- 180
5.0 200
180
0.4 -
- -
0.4 -
- -
10
5
75
- 45
0.5 -
0.0 -
- -
40
90
- 45
40
40
50
15
10
40
70
80
70
- 255
- 310
- 195
- 235
5.2
7.2
7.4
9.6
5.2
5.4
4.2
3.4
_
-
irT
-
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
^
-
_
-
0.2
0.6
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.2
9.5
9.9
5.8
7.5
58
24
63
18
86
76
50
57
—
-
-—
-
358
358
74
83
I_1
-
_
-
113
29
72
69
169
164
11
101
93
90
74
90
65
81
75
380
-
270
-
70
160
-
_
-
«M
-
25
120
-
—
-
_
-
130
90
100
35
110
90
50
60
5.0
-
5.0
1.7
2.5
—
-
^m
-
0.0
-
0.1
-
^
-
-
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.2
0.2
0.1
0.3
160
-
20
-
100
-
90
—
-
^
-
40
-
100
-
— ^
-
-
110
90
60
30
110
90
20
30
2.4
-
0.0
-
1.0
-
0.0
-
—
-
lmt
-
0.1
-
0.4
-
^
-
_
-
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.2
0.2
0.1
0.0
160
130
30
80
30
110
10
30
—
-
Jl
-
10
15
110
60
—
-
_
-
70
130
30
240
30
30
10
10
40
80
170
25
15
12
10
3.4
1.3
0.1
1.8
1.4
3.4
0.1
0.1
—
-
jr
-
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.1
_
-
-
2.1
3.8
0.1
0.9
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.0
38
8
40
10
202
191
126
131
—
-
—
-
317
307
52
54
_
-
—
96
80
U
217
219
88
87
80
88
11
65
64
62
59
SPEED IDLE TEST RESULTS ARE:
HC - PPM/HEXANE, CO - %, UNCORRECTED NOX - PPM
M-15
-------
APPENDIX M.CONT'D
LISTING OF TWO SPEED IDLE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
NO.
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
YR MAKE
75 COLT
75 DATS
•
75 DATS
75 DATS
75 FIAT
75 FIAT
75 HOND
75 MAZD
75 MAZD
ACCEPT BEFORE MTCE
MODL MODE HC CO HC CO NOX
SEDA 2250CN) -
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE -
710 2250(N)
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE -
B210 2250(N) -
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE -
SEDA 2250CN) -
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE -
STAW 2250(N)
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE -
X1-9 2250(N) -
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE -
CVCC 2250(N) -
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE -
RX3 2250(N) -
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE -
RX3 2250(N) -
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE -
20
20
60
55
25
45
1°
$5
75
50
- 140
- 135
20
30
80
70
- 45
- 175
90
- 2000
20
10
25
20
75
95
- 225
- 265
0
0
0
0
10
15
10
10
0.4
0.4
3.0
3.0
1.0
1.1
1.4
1.2
1.1
1.0
1 1
1*.4
0.7
0.7
1.9
1.7
0.7
1.0
1.6
7.5
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.7
1.1
1.2
1.6
0.1
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.0
62
64
37
35
82
103
27
42
92
82
35
48
113
131
34
41
126
52
28
13
94
138
61
72
154
146
97
95
40
34
26
26
34
32
22
21
MECH
HC
20
-
80
—
50
—
100
100
-
150
30
140
-
90
1450
-
25
-
40
-
_
-
_
-
20
-
10
_
40
-
10
-
REC
CO
Q.4
-
3.6
—
0.9
—
1.0
0.9
-
1.3
0.8
-
2.8
-
1.2
-
7.6
0.1
-
0.1
-
_
-
_
-
0.0
-
0.0
_
0.1
-
0.3
MECH
HC
20
-
40
—
80
-
150
100
-
230
-
30
110
-
60
-
90
15
-
50
—
.
-
_
-
25
-
10
—
10
—
20
-
CK
CO
0.4
-
1.1
—
1.2
-
0.6
0.9
-
0.7
0.6
—
1.7
-
0.5
-
0.3
-
0.1
-
3.0
—
_
—
-
—
0.0
—
0.0
—
0.1
—
o.o
—
AFTER WTCE
HC CO NOX
15
140
35
150
40
25
120
80
60
60
168
150
15
25
60
75
20
60
50
800
15
25
25
30
-
— *
-
™ *
200
*>r\
7'J
2000
4 f- Art
1500
60
in
lU
30
in
IV
0.5 61
, * •* vi
4.8 95
0.8 113
3.4 57
1.0 126
0.9 103
0.6 63
0.6 61
1.1 83
0.8 106
0.6 36
0.6 42
0.6 106
0.6 103
1.4 40
1.3 42
0.4 53
2.1 50
1.1 37
8* rtA
.1 20
0.1 121
04 102
.1 lo
o-1 &
01 71
.1 i '
-
-
I'l I
u>t
1 7 17
08 20
U.u
0.2 25
o.o 32
\J » V
oio 28
V • "*
TWO SPEED IDLE TEST RESULTS ARE: HC - PPM/HEXANE, CO - %, UNCORRECTED NOX
-PPM
M-16
-------
APPENDIX M.CONT'D
LISTING OF TWO SPEED IDLE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
NO. YR MAKE
335 75 MG
jjj l J
336 75 OPEL
JJ i ^
338 75 PORS
339 75 TOYO
310 75 TOYO
311 75 TOYO
312 75 VOLK
313 75 VOLK
^ 75 VOLK
MODL MODE
MGB 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
STAW 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
911S 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
CORO 2250CN)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
CELI 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
CORO 2250CN)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
SEDA 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
RABB 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
RABB 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
ACCEPT BEFORE MTCE
HC CO HC CO NOX
10
10
20
20
50
45
- - 85
80
35
30
- 135
70
40 0.7 -
_ _ _
50 0.9 -
50
25
- 1200
- 1000
60
10
- - 38
9
- 100
- 115
- 260
- 260
- 250
- 390
- 100
- 150
15 0.0 -
15 0.0 -
0.3
0.3
1.0
1.0
2.0
1.7
3.2
3.0
0.6
0.7
1.7
2.2
—
-
—
-
0.7
0.7
0.6
0.8
1.1
0.6
0.9
0.4
1.4
1.5
2.4
2.7
0.6
0.7
2.5
2.8
-
_
_
111
90
68
56
98
103
77
101
92
73
70
_
-
—
-
55
60
75
90
11
38
63
222
171
11
106
113
34
35
-
.
_
MECH REC
HC CO
10
-
20
-
70
60
-
50
-
80
-
n
-
—
-
70
190
-
5
5
160
-
250
180
350
-
_
_
0.3
1.0
-
1.5
1.1
-
0.9
3.0
—
-
—
-
0.3
0.3
0.1
0.1
1.1
-
2.4
0.9
2.8
-
-
_
MECH CK
HC CO
10
-
20
-
60
-
40
-
50
-
100
-
_
-
—
-
50
140
-
20
20
130
-
210
150
60
-
_
_
0.3
—
1.0
-
1.4
-
0.6
-
0.6
-
1.5
-
_
-
—
-
0.2
-
0.2
-
0.0
0.1
1.0
-
1.7
0.4
1.8
-
-
_
AFTER MTCE
HC CO NOX
10
15
15
80
25
25
50
35
10
20
35
80
_
-
—
-
70
125
900
1020
40
15
22
25
120
110
140
330
260
290
180
650
-
_
0.4
0.4
0.9
2.7
0.4
0.4
1.1
0.9
0.4
0.4
1.1
1.1
—
-
_
-
0.8
0.5
0.6
1.0
0.9
0.6
0.6
0.4
1.2
1.1
1.8
1.6
0.7
0.8
3.6
6.2
-
_
60
63
40
34
234
202
89
79
97
o o
OO
91
90
_
-
_
-
44
113
50
121
57
60
36
46
176
196
ll
108
60
31
12
-
_
_
ISPEED ^LE TEST RESULTS ARE:
HC - PPM/HEXANE, CO - %, UNCORRECTED NOX - PPM
M-17
-------
APPENDIX M,CONT'D
LISTING OF TWO SPEED IDLE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
ACCEPT BEFORE MTCE
NO. YR
345 75
511 75
512 75
513 75
514 75
515 75
516 75
517 75
518 75
TUn <3Pl
MAKE
VOLV
FORD
MERC
OLDS
PLYM
PONT
BMW
BMW
SUBA
irvn T
MODL MODE
SEDA 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
GRAN 2250CN)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
MONA 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
OMEG 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
GRNF 2250CN)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
VENT 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
SEDA 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
5301 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
STAW 2250CN)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
m i? Tt?«5T BPsm •
HC CO HC
10
20
15
20
15
20
20
25
10
15
10
15
65
50
70
95
20
40
- 340
- 350
10
20
15
20
4
5
i\
8
20
30
- 2000
- 2000
40
- - 65
- 190
- 230
r
-------
APPENDIX M.CONT'D
LISTING OF TWO SPEED IDLE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
NO. YR MAKE
519 75 MERE
J iy I ^
520 75 PORS
521 75 SAAB
52275 AMMO
523 75 AMMO
521 75 DODG
525 75 MERC
531 75 AMMO
535 76 AMMO
ACCEPT BEFORE MTCE
MODL MODE HC CO HC CO NOX
450S 2250CN) -
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE -
914 2250(N) -
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE -
99LE 2250(N) -
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE -
HORN 2250(N) -
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE -
HORN 2250(N) -
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE -
MONA 2250(N) -
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE -
MARQ 2250(N) -
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE -
GREM 2250(N) 80
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N) 230
REPLICATE -
HORN 2250(N) 110
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N) 180
REPLICATE -
10
10
20
30
20
20
40
45
40
180
- 1580
- 1680
60
70
- 190
- 200
55
55
- 105
- 110
20
40
- 250
- 170
10
10
25
20
1.3 75
- 115
6.4 270
- 268
1.6 70
80
4.2 130
- 130
0.3
0.3
0.6
0.8
0.4
0.4
0.8
0.8
0.4
0.6
1.1
1.1
0 7
o!6
2.3
2.4
1.9
1.9
3.1
3.1
0.3
1.0
4.0
2.2
0.2
0.2
0.3
0.5
1.6
1.9
8.0
7.8
2.4
3.0
2.3
2.5
45
47
1?
92
88
70
70
151
169
65
65
696
655
94
86
368
450
136
133
171
286
31
34
103
103
58
60
276
266
43
49
72
56
36
36
MECH REC
HC CO
80
-
65
_
-
—
-
_
-
—
-
90
210
-
50
90
30
300
-
40
-
60
-
65
210
100
150
0-2
1.0
—
-
—
-
_
-
—
-
1.1
-
2.0
-
1.4
-
2.5
0.4
-
3-4
0.3
0.5
0.8
-
4.7
1.3
2.5
MECH CK
HC CO
80
-
65
_
-
—
-
_
-
—
-
70
180
-
55
75
20
-
130
30
80
-
45
90
90
110
0.2
-
1.0
_
-
—
-
.
—
—
-
0.4
-
0.7
0.9
0.4
-
0.1
-
0.3
0.3
0.4
-
0.8
-
0.1
1.7
0.3
AFTER MTCE
HC CO NOX
15
15
40
25
_
-
—
-
_
—
_
-
60
95
50
210
55
50
80
55
10
10
20
10
10
10
25
20
65
100
120
135
60
80
100
100
0.2
0.2
0.?
0.4
w
-
—
-
_
—
—
-
0.8
1.3
2.2
3.6
! 7
1.8
0.5
0.4
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.3
0.3
0.6
1.9
2.3
0.4
0.6
1.6
2.0
0.4
0.4
48
45
11
_
-
•
-
_
—
—
-
171
378
98
68
389
389
131
126
286
317
53
61
146
95
67
53
229
204
69
69
250
239
88
84
SpEED IDLE TEST RESULTS ARE: HC - PPM/HEXANE, CO - %, UNCORRECTED NOX - PPM
M-19
-------
APPENDIX M.CQNT'D
LISTING OF TWO SPEED IDLE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
ACCEPT BEFORE MTCE MECH REC MECH CK AFTER wm?
NO. YR MAKE MODL MODE HC CO HC CO NOX HC CO HC CO HC CO m
536 75 AMMO PACE 225000 120 4?8 80~ 5.6 156 300 .?.2~~165~~4T4So'lT'lSi
REPLICATE - - 120 6.8 121 - ,- - - 1*15 7.4 jjj
IDLE(N) 180 4.6 150 6.2 66 460 6.8 200 1.0 800? 106
REPLICATE - - 170 6.0 64 - •- - - 110 0^9 106
537 75 AMMO HORN 2250(N) 50 0.5 ----------
REPLICATE --------____
IDLE(N) 90 0.1- - - - - - - ...
REPLICATE ----------._
538 75 AMMO HORN 2250(N) 40 0.2 10 0.4 50 25 0.2 25 0.2 40 0.3 151
REPLICATE - - 20 0.3 181 - - - - 40 0.3 202
IDLE(N) 170 2.2 20 1.2 40 30 1.5 70 0.5 30 0.9 36
REPLICATE - - 30 1.5 39 - - - - 50 0.6 40
539 75 AMMO HORN 2250(N) 70 1.7 - - - - - - - ---
REPLICATE ------------
IDLE(N) 130 1.5 - - - - - - - - - -
REPLICATE ------------
540 75 AMMO PACE 2250(N) 70 3-7 80 3.0 389 65 1.1 90 2.3 55 3.6 106
REPLICATE - - 100 3-8 286 - - - - 75 O 126
IDLE(N) 100 3.1 130 3.3 111 150 3-0 100 1.0 50 1.J ]M
REPLICATE - - 140 3.2 101 - - - - 70 1.5 171
541 75 AMMO MATA 2250(N) 290 0.0 - - - - - - - - - -
REPLICATE ------------
IDLE(N) 45 0.0 - - - - - - _ - - -
REPLICATE ------------
542 75 BUIC SKYL 2250(N) 25 0.1- - - - - - - - - -
REPLICATE -----------'
IDLE(N) 250 1.0 - - - - - - - - - "
REPLICATE -----------
543 75 BUIC REGA 2250(N) 40 0.6 - - - - - - - - ' I
REPLICATE -----------
IDLE(N) 30 0.1- - - - - - - " ~.
REPLICATE -----------
fti
544 75 BUIC LESA 2250(N) 140 6.5 60 3.0 50 220 1.9 50 1.6 80 3-0 w
REPLICATE - 110 4.8 62 - - - - 12° 5O
IDLE(N) 180 3.8 120 3.2 35 245 4.4 45 0.1 5
REPLICATE - - 170 4.8 26 - - - - 3°
TWO SPEED IDLE TEST RESULTS ARE: HC - PPM/HEXANE, CO - %, UNCORRECTED NOX -
M-20
-------
APPENDIX M.CONT'D
LISTING OF TWO SPEED IDLE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
ACCEPT
NO. YR MAKE MODL MODE HC CO
DENVER
BEFORE MTCE MECH REC MECH CK AFTER MTCE
HC CO NOX HC CO HC CO HC CO NOX
545 75 BUIC
546 75 BUIC
517 75 BUIC
518 75 BUIC
519 75 BUIC
550 75 BUIC
551 75 BUIC
552 75 BUIC
553 75 BUIC
LESA 2250 (N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
REGA 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
REGA 2250CN)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
LESA 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
LESA 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
LESA 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
LESA 2250CN)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
RIVI 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
RIVI 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
140
175
120
30
180
-
240
-
80
-
120
-
70
-
160
-
120
-
220
-
145
225
-
120
-
110
200
225
4.0
1.9
2.8
0.0
-
6.5
-
6.0
-
2.2
-
1.2
-
0.8
-
2.2
-
3-8
4.8
-
2.2
2.6
-
3.2
0.7
3.0
6.2
-
-
115
110
160
200
•»
_
mat
-
55
70
150
150
75
120
200
230
90
100
180
200
_
-
^
_
50
75
150
160
-
-
3.7
4.6
4.7
6.4
_
-
_
-
1.6
2.0
3-0
3-0
4.2
5.4
6.2
6.6
2.2
2.8
?-8
4.4
_
-
_
_
1.9
2.9
U
-
-
92
72
65
40
«.
-
— »
-
209
199
30
34
79
48
42
20
79
67
48
33
_
-
_
_
g
n
-
-
90
155
_
-
w
-
55
150
145
-
270
-
100
180
-
_
-
i_r
_
100
225
-
-
1.6
-
2.5
_. .
-
—
-
0.8
-
2.2
-
4.2
-
7-3
1.4
2.8
-
-
_
_
1.5
7.5
-
-
60
-
30
_
_
— „
-
25
-
15
75
25
85
30
-
_
_
50
25
-
-
1.0
-
0.0
-
«.
-
-w
-
0.4
-
0.0
-
1.3
0.0
-
1.3
0.1
—
-
_
1.2
0.1
-
-
50
60
15
20
_
-
•w
-
25
20
10
10
55
70
65
70
70
90
25
90
-
_
70
60
25
10
-
2.4
2.8
0.0
0.0
—
-
«•»
-
1.0
1.0
0.0
0.0
2.7
3-2
1.1
1.1
2.4
2.2
0.1
0.4
-
_
2.0
2.9
0.1
0.1
-
-
84
83
82
94
—
-
_
-
60
68
60
70
82
57
45
32
84
71
60
52
-
_
72
65
57
60
spEED IDLE TEST RESULTS ARE: HC - PPM/HEXANE, CO - %, UNCORRECTED NOX - PPM
M-21
-------
APPENDIX M.CONT'D
LISTING OF TWO SPEED IDLE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
NO.
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
YR MAKE
75 BUIC
75 CADI
75 CADI
75 CADI
75 CADI
75 CADI
75 CADI
75 CADI
76 CADI
MODL MODE
STAW 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
ELDO 2250CN)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
DEVI 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
ELDO 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
GALA 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
ELDO 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
DEVI 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
GALA 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
SEVI 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
ACCi
HC
160
170
80
100
70
220
100
60
130
60
130
550
210
420
110
240
15
15
EPT
CO
1.8
3.0
2.0
0.0
1.8
0.3
4.0
0.1
2.4
0.0
2.6
7.5
4.6
2.2
3.0
0.4
0.0
0.0
BEFi
HC
70
120
160
200
-
_
-
-
_
-
-
-
100
150
185
640
80
150
400
460
-
-
-
-
ORE M
CO
2.8
3.6
5.0
5.9
_
-
-
-
-
_
-
•»
3.2
3-7
8.8
8.3
2.8
4.0
4.6
4.6
-
•
-
-
TCE
NOX
96
72
65
45
-
_
_
_
_
_
_
-
116
111
42
44
99
90
48
52
-
^
M
-
MECH REG
HC CO
125 4,.0
185 3.8
_ _
_ _
-
_ _
-
_ _
_ _
— ^
170 3.0
710 8.4
140 2.1
520 4.8
-
••> *—
. -
-
MECH CK
HC CO
100 2.0
50 0.1
-
- -
— _
-
-
_ _
- -
•M w
80 1.2
130 0.1
100 2.2
200 0.5
_ _
-
-
^
AFTER MICE
HC CO NOX
70
65
30
20
—
w
-
-
_
-
-
-
70
100
90
110
85
150
2°
40
-
-
—
_
1.6 80
0.9 84
0.1 28
0.1 1)6
-
^ ^
— _
-
-
-
-
-
2.4 90
2.0 95
0.1 14]
0.1 126
3-6 ]6]
5.0 161
0.0 108
0.0 103
—
-
-
-
TWO SPEED IDLE TEST RESULTS ARE: HC - PPM/HEXANE, CO - %, UNCORRECTED NOX -
M-22
-------
APPENDIX M,CONT'D
LISTING OF TWO SPEED IDLE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
ACCEPT
NO. YR MAKE MODL MODE HC CO
DENVER
BEFORE MTCE MECH REC MECH CK AFTER MTCE
HC CO NOX HC CO HC CO HC CO NOX
563 75 CHEV
564 75 CHEV
565 75 CHEV
566 75 CHEV
567 75 CHEV
568 75 CHEV
569 75 CHEV
570 75 CHEV
571 75 CHEV
MONZ 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
VEGA 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
VEGA 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
MONZ 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
VEGA 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
VEGA 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
VEGA 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
MONZ 2250CN)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
VEGA 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
180
130
330
60
370
370
100
40
300
350
170
410
350
340
350
300
27
340
4.2
1.8
5.4
0.0
9.8
9.4
1.8
0.0
6.8
6.0
6.2
9.8
7.8
6.8
8.0
5.2
7-9
6.9
- -
190 8.8
320 10.0
420 10.0
900 10.0
- -
- -
180 3.8
380 8.0
350 4.9
520 8.4
70 ?.0
140 4.3
270 9.0
350 8.8
120 2.3
140 2.8
280 6.4
330 7-3
150 4.2
200 5.6
280 6.0
310 7.6
280 6.8
400 8.4
600 8.2
920 10.0
-
_
86
38
16
10
-
_>
51
35
42
27
58
36
18
8
101
82
3
11
45
17
103
46
?J
-
_
275
370
_
-
800
350
170
275
150
270
140
240
480
840
-
_
4.4
9.0
_
-
2.2
1.0
6.2
9.8
1.0
4.5
1.6
3.4
5.8
6.0
-
-
200
160
_
-
100
200
125
225
100
30
120
25
300
250
-
-
3.4
0.3
_
—
0.1
0.2
2.2
0.5
0.6
0.0
1.5
0.0
4.5
0.0
-
-
115
160
130
160
—
—
100
170
150
160
30
50
80
150
70
20
10
15
180
210
320
350
240
270
440
600
-
_
4.2
5.1
2-J
2.6
•
—
2.0
3.2
3.2
3.0
0.8
1.9
0.5
1.2
1.5
0.9
0.0
0.0
4.8
4.8
1.4
1.4
i:8
U
-
_
166
92
46
26
_
_
53
45
49
46
11
6
12
70
74
111
103
49
30
88
16
141
75
48
20
SpEED IDLE TEST RESULTS ARE: HC - PPM/HEXANE, CO - %, UNCORRECTED NOX - PPM
M-23
-------
APPENDIX M,CONT'D
LISTING OF TWO SPEED IDLE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
ACCEPT BEFORE MTCE MECH REC MECH CK AFTER WTCF
NO. YR MAKE MODL MODE HC CO HC CO NOX HC CO HC CO HC CO NQX
572 75 CHEV MONZ 2250(N) 20 0.0 - - - - - - --II"
REPLICATE ---------___
IDLE(N) 30 o.O--------..
REPLICATE ------_--___
573 75 CHEV NOVA 2250(N) 15 0.1- - - - - - - --.
REPLICATE --------....
IDLE(N) 25 0.0 ----------
REPLICATE ------------
574 75 CHEV CAMA 2250(N) 30 0.0 - - - - - - - ...
REPLICATE ------------
IDLE(N) 40 0.0 - - - - - - - -
REPLICATE ------------
575 75 CHEV NOVA 2250(N) 130 3.2 - - - - - - - -
REPLICATE ------------
IDLE(N) 80 1.2- - - - - - - .--
REPLICATE -----------
576 75 CHEV NOVA 2250(N) 50 0.0 ----------
REPLICATE ------------
IDLE(N) 60 0.0 - - - - - - - -
REPLICATE ------------
577 75 CHEV NOVA 2250(N) 30 0.1- - - - - - - - - "
REPLICATE ------------
IDLE(N) 40 0.3 ----------
REPLICATE ------------
578 75 CHEV MONZ 2250(N) 20 0.0 ----------
REPLICATE ------------
IDLE(N) 32 0.0 - - - - - - ' \
REPLICATE -----------
579 75 CHEV MONZ 2250(N) 10 0.0 --------- ',
REPLICATE -----------
IDLE(N) 30 0.0 -
REPLICATE ------
580 75 CHEV NOVA 2250(N) 220 4.1 60 2.3 116 150
REPLICATE - - 150 4.0 60 -
IDLE(N) 350 6.1 190 4.0 51 270
REPLICATE - - 230 4.2 26 -
3.5
4.8
80 0.3
70 0.4
20
60
15
35
TWO SPEED IDLE TEST RESULTS ARE: HC - PPM/HEXANE, CO - %, UNCORRECTED
NOX
2-5 g
2.2 98
n 1 60
o!o »
- PPM
M-24
-------
APPENDIX M,CONT'D
LISTING OF TWO SPEED IDLE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
NO. YR MAKE
581 75 CHEV
582 75 CHEV
583 75 CHEV
MODL MODE
NOVA 2250CN)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
NOVA 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
NOVA 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
ACCEPT
HC CO
150
375
140
180
250
350
3-8
8.0
3.8
2.2
5.2
5.0
BEFORE MTCE
HC CO NOX
70
120
180
190
85
120
20
125
110
220
260
310
2.4
3.8
5.6
6.2
2.8
3.6
0.1
1.4
3.3
5.3
4.0
3-7
123
96
74
60
121
111
6
74
113
86
47
45
MECH REC
HC CO
25
120
60
150
200
360
0.3
4.1
0.9
1.0
3.0
5.0
MECH CK
HC CO
15
9
50
150
75
60
0.8
0.0
0.9
0.0
2.2
0.2
AFTER MTCE
HC CO NOX
60
70
95
90
30
35
30
30
130
190
110
165
1.0
2.6
2.3
2.2
1.0
2.9
0.0
0.0
3-7
5.4
1.5
0.9
11
36
32
68
98
60
58
113
93
49
70
584 75 CHEV CAMA 2250(N) 30 0.0
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N) 40 0.0
REPLICATE -
585 75 CHEV NOVA 2250(N) 20 0.0
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N) 30 0.0
REPLICATE -
586 75 CHEV NOVA 2250(N) 70 1.3
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N) 40 0.0
REPLICATE -
58? 75 CHEV MALI 2250(N) 140 3-8
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N) 230 0.9
REPLICATE -
588 75 CHEV MONT 2250(N) 190 3-8
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N) 270 4.0
REPLICATE -
589 75 CHEV MALI 2250CN) 180 3.6
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N) 420 7.2
REPLICATE -
85
85
165
200
430
430
0.9
0.9
1.5
1.5
5.0
5.9
8.4
8.4
90
2 -
1.1 110 0.8
6 205
8 -
3.2 190 0.9
200 4.0 120 2.0
550 8.0 90 0.1
100
120
25
20
90
190
75
40
1.7
2.2
0.0
0.0
4.4
5.6
0.1
0.0
76
74
52
68
30
SPEED IDLE TEST RESULTS ARE: HC - PPM/HEXANE, CO - %, UNCORRECTED NOX - PPM
M-25
-------
APPENDIX M.CONT'D
LISTING OF TWO SPEED IDLE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
NO.
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
YR MAKE MODL MODE
75 CHEV MALI 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
75 CHEV MONT 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
75 CHEV MONT 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
75 CHEV MALI 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
75 CHEV MONT 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
75 CHEV MALI 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
75 CHEV STAW 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
75 CHEV STAW 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
75 CHEV NOVA 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
ACCEPT
HC CO
40
50
255
-
400
-
130
230
• -
160
-
330
100
-
215
175
-
180
-
125
215
30
-
40
_
166
-
340
-
0.4
0.6
-
7.0
-
6.9
4.2
-
3-9
3.8
4.3
2.3
4.2
-
4.1
-
3.0
3.3
4.3
0.1
-
0.1
_
3.8
5.4
-
BEFORE MTCE
HC CO NOX
:
-
180
260
400
390
100
210
240
310
50
200
250
390
90
150
215
240
100
150
110
130
80
165
200
240
_
-
_
_
130
200
370
350
:
-
6.2
7.6
Z-6
8.3
4.5
6.4
4.4
5.6
0.9
5.0
4.1
7.8
3.2
4.6
5.2
5.2
2.7
4.1
1.2
1.4
3.6
5.0
U
_
-
_
_
4.4
5.3
?-S
4.8
-
—
83
60
45
38
108
74
58
39
26
83
44
36
85
48
50
32
92
60
56
42
2?
56
20
_
-
_
_
90
80
39
37
MECH
HC
-
-
160
-
360
-
200
-
350
-
130
350
65
-
150
60
-
300
-
160
120
—
-
—
M
165
—
400
-
REG
CO
-
5.0
-
9.0
3.0
-
4.5
-
2.4
-
5.2
0.5
-
1.2
-
1.0
-
1.7
4.8
2.8
_
-
H
—
3.7
5.2
-
MECH
HC
-
-
90
40
-
40
-
30
60
-
120
-
20
-
20
-
50
-
40
-
30
40
_
—
_
—
80
-
30
-
CK
CO
^
-
1.8
-
0.1
-
0.5
-
0.1
-
0.2
—
0.1
-
0.1
-
0.0
-
0.1
—
0.3
-
0.1
0.1
—
•"
-
—
1.9
—
0.1
~
AFTER MICE
HC CO NOX
-
-
145
215
25
40
70
80
30
30
20
15
10
10
30
50
20
30
120
120
40
ii /\
40
15
50
10
20
-
"
-
•"
60
nfi
gu
20
•ac
30
—
-
6.0
7.8
0.1
0.1
0.8
2.5
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.8
2.2
0.1
1.0
4.0
3f\
•2
0.1
04
.1
0.1
1.3
0.0
0.0
-
-
3-5
•3 2
j.t
0.1
0.1
v • *
>»— w
-
75
50
98
56
70
93
9
W
136
126
75
72
84
nC
76
66
liQ
40
85
111
1 1 1
101
mi
1UI
106
176
lol
—
'.
121
126
§6
64
TWO SPEED IDLE TEST RESULTS ARE: HC - PPM/HEXANE, CO - %, UNCORRECTED NOX -
M-26
-------
APPENDIX M,CONT'D
LISTING OF TWO SPEED IDLE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
ACCEPT BEFORE MTCE MECH REC MECH CK AFTER MTCE
NO. YR MAKE MODL MODE HC CO HC CO NOX HC CO HC CO HC CO NOX
^re~CHEvl»NT~2250(N)~~ 50 ~0~5 liTF'^^ 80 1.5 65 1.3 60 3.0 84
REPLICATE - - 115 3.2 164 - - - - 150 4.6 62
IDLE(N) 350 3-5 300 3.3 35 145 1.6 70 0.1 100 0.8 40
REPLICATE - - 350 4.4 35 - - - - 180 2.6 34
600 75 CHEV MALI. 2250(N) 195 3-5 152 3.8 88 150 1.4 120 2.4 700 2.0 94
REPLICATE - - 220 4.8 55 - - - - 130 3-3 80
IDLE(N) 490 5.8 400 7.2 46 450 6.2 130 0.2 190 0.0 49
REPLICATE - - 430 6.2 22 - - - - 155 0.0 60
601 75 CHEV STAW 2250(N) 50 0.1 -
REPLICATE ------------
IDLE(N) 60 0.0 ----------
REPLICATE ------------
602 76 CHEV CAMA 2250CN) 110 1.4 -
REPLICATE ------------
IDLE(N) 180 0.9 ----------
REPLICATE ------------
603 76 CHEV MALI 2250(N) 10 0.0 ----------
REPLICATE ------------
IDLE(N) 10 0.0 ----------
REPLICATE ------------
601 75 CHEV STAW 2250(N) 600.1-
REPLICATE ------------
IDLE(N) 90 0.3 ----------
REPLICATE ------------
605 75 CHEV IMPA 2250CN) 25 0.0 ----------
REPLICATE ------------
IDLE(N) 45 0.0 ----------
REPLICATE ------------
606 75 CHEV STAW 2250CN) 30 0.0 ----------
REPLICATE ------------
IDLE(N) 40 0.0 ----------
REPLICATE ------------
607 75 CHEV IMPA 2250(N) 20 0.0
REPLICATE ------------
IDLE(N) 40 0.0 ----------
REPLICATE ------------
TllA
SpEED IDLE TEST RESULTS ARE: HC - PPM/HEXANE, CO - %, UNCORRECTED NOX - PPM
M-27
-------
APPENDIX M,CONT'D
LISTING OF TWO SPEED IDLE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
ACCEPT
NO.
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
YR MAKE MODL MODE
75 CHEV CAPR 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
75 CHRY CORD 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
75 CHRY CORD 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
75 CHRY NEWP 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
75 CHRY CORD 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
75 CHRY NEWP 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
75 CHRY NEWY 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
75 CHRY NEWY 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
75 DODG DART 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
HC
40
—
350
50
-
160
-
130
320
-
200
-
860
-
95
-
170
-
90
510
-
30
25
-
50
-
175
-
375
240
-
CO
0.0
—
0.0
-
0.8
-
3.6
—
3.1
7.9
5.2
-
10.0
-
2.5
-
1.5
-
2.3
8.0
-
0.1
-
0.0
-
0.4
-
4.5
-
2.2
_
5.2
-
BEFORE MTCE
HC
120
140
350
420
10
20
60
70
20
90
190
230
410
420
1100
1320
.M
-
—
-
60
90
300
270
_
-
_
-
55
50
200
200
410
380
210
230
CO
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.4
0.6
1.6
1.6
0.0
1.8
4.5
6.2
4.0
4.4
10.0
10.0
«•
.
MM
-
1.6
2.2
6.2
6.0
_
-
•M
-
1.2
0.9
5.8
5.4
0.4
0.8
4.0
5.2
NOX
88
82
38
34
146
166
37
36
176
389
45
44
227
174
18
15
—
—
••»
-
307
225
52
50
.
-
_
-
286
389
42
44
542
501
69
62
MECH REG
HC
180
—
560
-
65
-
230
—
80
-
220
—
150
-
930
_
-
_
-
90
370
-
_
-
M
-
50
-
215
-
600
-
90
qo
0.1
-
0.2
-
1.2
-
4.2
—
0.9
4.4
-
3-2
10.0
-
..
-
—
-
2.1
-
6.8
-
«
-
_
-
0.9
4.5
-
0.1
-
3.2
MECH
HC
30
20
-
25
40
-
60
-
100
-
70
70
_
-
M
-
50
-
150
—
_
—
_
-
5
-
12
-
100
-
150
-
CK
CO
0.1
-
0.1
-
0.5
-
0.3
-
0.3
0.3
2.2
-
0.3
_
—
_
—
0.7
—
0.3
—
—
—
_
—
0.1
—
0.0
—
0.1
-
0.8
—
AFTRR tfrrp
HC
0
0
20
20
5
20
15
30
10
65
95
135
70
100
45
95
-
••
-
—
60
50
25
20
-
*""
-
"•
10
f\f\
30
5
5
120
ten
150
150
165
CO
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.6
0.9
0.6
1.0
0.0
0.4
2.3
2.6
2.4
2.7
0.1
0.8
-
«•»
.
""
0.2
Oil
.4
0.1
04
.1
-
-
0.0
10
o
o.o
n 0
\J i V
1.4
•) n
£* V
3-2
\ 6
J *
'* VU
NOX
111
i i 1
121
45
46
146
136
54
54
430
573
56
60
245
232
60
61
-
—
-
—
164
1C1
Ipl
41)
-
-
ll
1J8
$!
1
TWO SPEED IDLE TEST RESULTS ARE: HC - PPM/HEXANE, CO - %, UNCORRECTED NOX -
M-28
-------
APPENDIX M,CONT'D
LISTING OF TWO SPEED IDLE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
NO. YR MAKE MODL MODE
617~76 DODG DART 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
618 75 DODG DART 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
619 75 DODG DART 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
620 75 DODG CHAR 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
621 75 DODG CHAR 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
622 75 DODG CHAR 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
623 75 DODG MONA 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
62I» 75 FORD PINT 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
625 75 FORD PINT 2250(N)
REPLICATE
ACCEPT
HC CO
140
140
-
50
-
210
-
50
-
30
200
-
270
-
400
-
680
-
900
-
215
300
-
1100
-
50
-
275
50
1.8
1.2
-
0.3
5.2
2.7
0.1
-
0.2
-
5.8
3.5
4.6
-
3-4
2.3
7.5
10.0
-
0.5
-
0.1
-
0.6
BEFORE MTCE
HC CO NOX
-
-
20
45
200
200
—
-
—
-
50
75
270
90
300
300
1SO
180
790
930
210
250
85
170
430
790
20
30
50
70
_
-
-
0.0
0.0
6.2
6.0
«
-
—
-
0.4
0.5
7.3
7.0
1.5
2.2
4.0
4.4
0.9
1.9
1.6
1.7
2.8
4.2
9.4
10.0
0.5
0.5
O.S
0.4
_
-
-
358
317
30
10
—
-
_
-
48
80
?6
48
327
460
**l
2B
171
154
38
35
151
111
32
30
42
56
26
36
_
MECH REC
HC CO
-
-
80
-
240
-
— ,
-
»
-
220
-
1100
-
90
200
-
100
-
280
-
120
-
380
—
40
-
200
—
_
-
0.6
-
7.0
_
-
_
-
0.1
-
6.9
1.3
3.3
1.2
-
4.5
2.2
-
7.4
0.5
0.3
_
MECH CK
HC CO
-
-
30
30
—
-
_
-
50
-
130
90
-
90
40
-
20
-
70
55
50
70
_
-
—
0.0
—
0.0
-
_
-
_
-
0.0
-
0.1
-
2.3
0.3
0.1
-
0.1
-
1.7
0.1
—
0.4
-
0.4
—
_
AFTER MTCE
HC CO NOX
-
-
25
15
10
10
_
-
_
-
10
25
200
125
100
60
20
35
80
180
20
75
70
75
100
140
25
30
45
50
_
-
—
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
_
-
_
-
0.0
0.4
1.7
1.2
1.3
1.5
0.1
0.3
3-7
5.2
0.1
0.7
3-2
3.6
1.2
2.6
0.4
0.5
0.9
1.0
_
-
—
419
399
§?
84
_
-
_
-
214
126
26
16
212
227
8
4
106
76
22
10
95
95
46
46
44
52
25
33
—
IDLE(N) 100 0.5
REPLICATE -
spEED IDLE TEST RESULTS ARE: HC - PPM/HEXANE, CO - $, UNCORRECTED NOX - PPM
M-29
-------
APPENDIX M,CONT'D
LISTING OF TWO SPEED IDLE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
NO. YR MAKE MODL MODE
ACCEPT BEFORE MTCE MECH REC MECH CK AFTER OTCF
HC CO HC CO NOX HC CO HC CO HC CO $«
626 75 FORD PINT 2250(N) 20 0.5 -
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N) 20 0.4 -
REPLICATE -
627 75 FORD MUST 2250(N) 30 2.0 -
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N) 50 0.3 -
REPLICATE -
628 75 FORD MUST 2250(N) 65 1.3 -
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N) 110 0.9 -
REPLICATE -
629 75 FORD PINT 2250(N) 20 0.2 -
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N) 30 0.2 -
REPLICATE -
630 75 FORD PINT 2250(N) 30 0.6 -
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
45 0.7
631 75 FORD PINT 2250(N) 50 0.6 -
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
45 0.6 -
632 75 FORD PINT 2250(N) 20 0.0
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
15 0.0
633 75 FORD PINT 2250(N) 35 0.6 -
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
52 0.8
634 75 FORD PINT 2250(N) 25 0.3
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
50 0.7
TWO SPEED IDLE TEST RESULTS ARE: HC - PPM/HEXANE, CO - %, UNCORRECTED NOX -
M-30
-------
APPENDIX M,CONT'D
LISTING OF TWO SPEED IDLE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
ACCEPT BEFORE MTCE MECH REC MECH CK AFTER MTCE
NO. YR MAKE MODL MODE HC CO HC CO NOX HC CO HC CO HC CO NOX
2250?N)80~~T72 --- "--
REPLICATE ------------
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
75 0.0 -
636 75 FORD STAW 2250(N) 35 0.1
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N)
40 0.1
REPLICATE -
637 75 FORD PINT 2250(N) 30 0.1
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
40 0.1
638 75 FORD STAW 2250(N) 30 0.2
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
35 0.1
639 75 FORD MUST 2250(N) 30 0.1
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N)
30 0.0
REPLICATE -
610 75 FORD GRAN 2250(N) 25 0.1
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N) 45 0.0
REPLICATE -
6IH 76 FORD MUST 2250(N) 50 0.0
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
35 0.0 -
6112 75 FORD MAVE 2250(N) 30 0.3 _ _ _ _
REPLICATE -----------
IDLE(N) 80 0.3 ---------
REPLICATE -----------
6I|3 75 FORD GRAN 2250(N) 40 0.3 ---------
REPLICATE -----------
IDLE(N) 25 0.2 ---------
REPLICATE -----------
spEED IDLE TEST RESULTS ARE: HC - PPM/HEXANE, CO - %, UNCORRECTED NOX - PPM
M-31
-------
APPENDIX M,CONT'D
LISTING OF TWO SPEED IDLE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
ACCEPT BEFORE MTCE MECH REC MECH CK AFTER tfrn?
NO. YR MAKE MODL MODE HC CO HC CO NOX HC CO HC CO HC CO NOX
644 75 FORD MAVE 2250?Nj 40 0.5 - - - - - - - I I I"
REPLICATE --------....
IDLE(N) 60 1.5 - - - - - - - --.
REPLICATE ---------...
645 75 FORD GRAN 2250(N) 35 0.1- - - - - - - ...
REPLICATE ----------_.
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
40 0.1
646 75 FORD GRAN 2250(N) 60 0.7 -
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N) 100 0.5 -
REPLICATE -
647 75 FORD GRAN 2250(N) 20 0.1
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N) 10 0.0 -
REPLICATE -
648 75 FORD ELIT 2250(N) 30 0.3 -
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N) 50 0.4 -
REPLICATE -
649 75 FORD GRAN 2250(N) 200 5.0 140 4.7 74 130 3-4 160 4.4 150 J.5 JO
REPLICATE - - 200 5.2 72 - - - - 150 5.4 "3
IDLE(N) 200 3.4 210 4.8 48 180 3.5 80 0.3 120 1.8 22
REPLICATE - - 225 4.2 49 - - - _ 110 1.8 «
650 75 FORD GRAN 2250(N) 40 0.1
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N) 30 0.0 -
REPLICATE -
651 75 FORD GRAN 2250(N) 60 0.1
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N) 60 0.0 -
REPLICATE -
652 75 FORD TORI 2250(N) 100 0.5 -
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N) 80 0.3 -
REPLICATE -
TWO SPEED IDLE TEST RESULTS ARE: HC - PPM/HEXANE, CO - 56, UNCORRECTED NOX -
M-32
-------
APPENDIX M,CONT'D
LISTING OF TWO SPEED IDLE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
NO. YR
653 75
MSJ i »
65475
65575
65675
65776
65875
65975
660 75
661 75
MAKE MODL MODE
FORD STAW 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
FORD ELIT 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
FORD LTD 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
FORD GRAN 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
FORD RANG 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
FORD TORI 2250CN)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
FORD GRAN 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
FORD TORI 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
FORD LTD 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
ACCEPT
HC CO
100
-
200
-
100
-
750
60
-
120
30
60
-
60
-
50
25
70
40
-
150
120
-
170
—
30
63
4.9
6.0
-
0.8
-
0.1
-
2.5
-
3.8
0.3
3-5
0.0
-
0.0
-
0.3
0.3
0.7
-
0.4
-
0.4
-
0.2
-
0.6
-
1.1
BEFORE MTCE
HC CO NOX
10
20
50
65
140
150
720
600
10
20
30
40
30
20
85
60
_
-
_
-
^^
-
—
-
—
-
—
-
^
-
^m
—
_
-
^
-
0.8
0.8
1.2
1.1
°-?
0.4
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.2
0.9
0.8
0.6
0.8
3.2
3.3
_
-
_
-
^
-
_
-
_
-
—
-
^m
-
^m
—
-
—
-
96
84
42
38
72
72
36
34
72
89
41
51
101
116
30
31
_
-
_»
-
mm
-
—
-
_
-
^
-
_r
-
^
-
-
^
-
MECH REC
HC CO
20 0.7
— —
120 1.3
- -
80 0.2
— —
650 0.1
- -
20 0.2
- -
30 0.9
150 5.2
- -
40 2.0
- -
_ _
- -
_ _
-
•^ M*
- -
— ^
- -
_
- -
— ^
-
•• ^
-
^m ^m
- -
- -
— m m
. .
MECH CK
HC CO
30 0.5
— —
80 0.3
- -
10 0.3
— —
50 0.1
- -
10 0.1
- -
20 0.1
40 0.3
- -
125 0.3
- -
_ _
- -
— —
- -
^m ^
- -
— —
- -
_
- -
• —
_
_
-
— t —
- -
- -
• -Mm
- -
AFTER MTCE
HC CO NOX
70
85
105
110
20
20
20
20
10
20
10
25
10
20
70
70
_
-
_
-
^m
-
^
-
_
-
^
-
—
-
^m
—
-
^m
-
0.6
0.9
0.5
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.4
0.5
0.3
1.0
0.3
1.1
0.3
0.3
0.2
0.2
_
-
—
-
^
-
—
-
„
-
^
-
^m
-
^
—
-
^m
—
58
48
52
50
60
54
65
54
80
56
76
50
348
389
72
90
M
-
^ .
-
9m
-
«.
-
_
-
—
-
^^
-
^
—
.
-
^m
-
SPEED IDLE TEST RESULTS ARE: HC - PPM/HEXANE, CO - %, UNCORRECTED NOX - PPM
M-33
-------
APPENDIX M,CONT'D
LISTING OF TWU SPEED IDLE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
NO.
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
YR MAKE MODL MODE
75 FORD LTD 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
75 FORD THND 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
75 FORD THND 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
76 LING CONT 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
75 LINC MRK4 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
75 MERC MONA 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
76 MERC MONA 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
75 MERC MONA 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
75 MERC COUG 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
ACCEPT
HC CO
25
60
40
60
70
130
80
130
30
20
60
255
85
70
35
40
30
50
0.5
0.3
0.8
1.6
3-5
5.1
0.1
5.0
0.8
0.5
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.6
0.6
BEFORE MTCE
HC CO NOX
-
-
40
90
130
165
60
50
40
35
-
-
15
20
60
35
*»
-
-
-
-
-
-
_
3.4
5.2
6.6
9.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
-
m
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
-
-
-
_
-
-
-
_
106
78
64
52
59
60
43
46
-
-
50
50
24
26
-
».
—
««
-
-
MECH REC
HC CO
-
-
100 3.0
160 5.4
250 0.1
200 7.0
_ _
-
50 0.0
270 0.0
-
-
_ _
— _
_ _
-
MECH CK
HC CO
- _
_ _
10 0.3
30 0.3
150 0.1
30 0.1
_ _
•v mm
10 0.0
80 0.0
-
v «
_ -
-
-
-
AFTER KTCE
HC CO NOX
-
-
10
25
30
30
20
25
§
-
-
30
50
110
70
-
-
-
-
-
^
-
-
0.2
0.5
0-3
0.6
1.0
0.7
0.9
0.8
-
-
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
-
-
""
""
— *
™ '
-
-
90
72
62
56
49
52
32
30
-
-
48
44
20
18
-
-"
-
-
-
*
TWO SPEED IDLE TEST RESULTS ARE: HC - PPM/HEXANE, CO - %, UNCORRECTED NOX -
M-34
-------
APPENDIX M,CONT'D
LISTING OF TWO SPEED IDLE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
ACCEPT BEFORE MTCE MECH REC MECH CK AFTER MTCE
NO. YR MAKE MODL MODE HC CO HC CO NOX HC CO HC CO HC CO NOX
6rT75~MERC~MONG 2250(N) 25 0.6 -
REPLICATE ------------
IDLE(N) 30 0.6 ----------
REPLICATE ------------
672 75 MERC MONG 2250(N) 30 1.0 10 0.6 48 110 0.4 20 0.2 8 0.4 18
REPLICATE - - 20 0.6 44 - - - - 10 0.4 28
IDLE(N) 130 2.7 90 2.4 22 155 2.9 60 0.1 125 0.1 50
REPLICATE - - 130 3.0 18 - - - - 80 0.2 65
673 76 MERC MONA 2250(N) 70 0.0 ----------
REPLICATE ------------
IDLE(N) 220 0.3 ----------
REPLICATE ------------
674 75 OLDS OMEG 2250(N) 130 1.2 -
REPLICATE ------------
IDLE(N) 20 0.0 ----------
REPLICATE ------------
675 75 OLDS OMEG 2250(N) 100 0.1 30 0.1 ni 120 0.2 50 0.1 15 0.0 103
REPLICATE - - 60 0.1 141 - - - - 15 0.0 113
IDLE(N) 375 4.0 280 3.6 50 270 2.5 50 0.1 15 0.0 38
REPLICATE - - 290 4.0 48 - - - - 100.0
676 75 OLDS CUTL 2250(N) 30 0.0 ---------
REPLICATE -----------
IDLE(N) 20 0.0 ---------
REPLICATE -----------
677 75 OLDS CUTL 2250(N) 30 0.0 -
REPLICATE -----------
IDLE(N) 20 0.0 ---------
REPLICATE -----------
678 75 OLDS CUTL 2250CN) 60 0.1---------
REPLICATE -----------
IDLE(N) 40 0.1 -
REPLICATE -----------
679 75 OLDS CUTL 2250(N) 10 0.0 ---------
REPLICATE -----------
IDLE(N) 20 0.0 ---------
REPLICATE -----------
TVfi ot\
spEED IDLE TEST RESULTS ARE: HC - PPM/HEXANE, CO - %, UNCORRECTED NOX - PPM
M-35
-------
APPENDIX M,CONT'D
LISTING OF TWO SPEED IDLE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
NO. YR MAKE MODL MODE
ACCEPT BEFORE MTCE MECH REC
HC CO HC CO NOX HC CO
MECH CK
HC CO
IDLE(N)
60 0.1
REPLICATE -
683 75 OLDS DELT 2250(N) 80 1.1
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
55 0.1
684 75 OLDS DELT 2250(N) 40 0.1
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
40 0.0 -
685 75 OLDS CUTL 2250(N) 50 0.4 -
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
40 0.0 -
686 76 OLDS STAW 2250(N) 50 0.0 -
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
40 0.0 -
687 75 OLDS CUTL 2250(N) 40 1.5
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
25 0.0 -
688 75 OLDS DELT 2250(N) 40 0.4 -
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE -
60 0.0 -
AFTER MTCP
HC CO NQX
680 75 OLDS CUTL 2250(N) 35 0.1
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N) 50 0.0 -
REPLICATE -
681 75 OLDS CUTL 2250(N) 80 0.0 -
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N) 60 0.0 -
REPLICATE -
682 75 OLDS CUTL 2250(N) 100 2.1
REPLICATE -
TWO SPEED IDLE TEST RESULTS ARE: HC - PPM/HEXANE, CO - $, UNCORRECTED NOX -
H-36
-------
APPENDIX M,CONT'D
LISTING OF TWO SPEED IDLE TEST PRXEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
NO. YR MAKE
689 75 PLYM
690 75 PLYM
691 75 PLYM
692 75 PLYM
693 75 PLYM
694 75 PLYM
695 76 PLYM
696 75 PONT
697 75 PONT
MODL MODE
DUST 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
VALI 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
DUST 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
DUST 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
FURY 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
FURY 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
STAW 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
FIRE 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
VENT 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
ACCEPT
HC CO
120
150
120
250
100
250
100
140
30
40
80
420
50
200
60
260
45
20
3.0
4.5
0.5
4.4
1.5
5.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.5
8.5
1.9
1.8
0.2
4.8
0.1
0.1
BEFORE MTCE
HC CO NOX
25
30
190
160
30
40
1°
80
60
150
260
290
-
-
_
-
85
90
460
650
—
-
15
100
325
550
-
-
0.1
0.4
5.0
4.2
0.1
0.2
1.7
1.9
1.6
2.4
8.1
7.2
_
-
-
-
2.3
2.7
8.2
8.4
-
-
0.1
0.9
7.1
9.2
_
-
106
50
36
31
450
491
80
85
222
327
29
31
-
-
-
_
378
307
21
20
—
-
296
286
21
20
-
-
MECH REC
HC CO
150
190
110
215
120
345
_
-
_
-
120
800
-
-
40
440
_
-
Q.1
3-1
0.4
3.9
0.6
6.3
_
-
_
-
2.6
9.8
—
-
0.3
8.2
_
-
MECH CK AFTER MTCE
HC CO HC CO NOX
60
40
56
95
100
40
_
-
_
-
70
30
—
-
40
140
-
-
0.1 15
15
0.3 10
10
0.1 30
50
0.8 90
80
0.6 20
90
0.1 15
40
_ _
- -
_ _
- -
1.3 10
- 45
0.1 15
30
_ _
-
0.1 5
- 140
0.1 15
- 210
- -
-
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.1
1.1
0.4
1.0
1.0
0.1
0.1
-
-
-
_
0.3
1.1
0.0
0.4
-
-
0.0
4.3
0.0
2.4
v
-
186
212
83
90
307
327
85
90
286
126
116
116
-
-
-
_
111
337
60
45
-
-
179
151
143
40
-
-
SPEED IDLE TEST RESULTS ARE: HC - PPM/HEXANE, CO - %, UNCORRECTED NOX - PPM
M-37
-------
APPENDIX M.CONT'D
LISTING OF TWO SPEED IDLE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
ACCEPT
NO.
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
YR MAKE MODL MODE
75 PONT FIRE 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
75 PONT LEMA 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
75 PONT CATA 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
76 PONT FIRE 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
75 PONT STAW 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
75 PONT GRNV 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
75 AUDI 100L 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
75 DATS B210 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
75 DATS B210 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
HC
410
—
700
-
130
-
180
-
220
-
800
-
150
-
320
40
-
50
—
130
70
-
50
-
80
-
0
-
50
70
100
-
CO
5.5
—
7.0
-
1.2
-
5.2
-
6.3
-
8.2
-
2.1
-
1.5
0.1
-
0.0
—
3.2
0.1
-
0.6
-
1.8
-
1.1
-
2.2
—
1.2
-
0.9
BEFORE MTCE
HC
790
140
370
190
100
160
200
250
110
170
460
345
150
220
38
mm
mm
mm
—
M
-
M
-
_
-
w.
-
50
60
110
110
mm
-
*•
—
CO
9.0
9.8
8.4
7.8
4.6
6.2
6.4
7.6
3.5
4.0
8.2
6.4
5.6
7.1
4.2
5.4
_
-
^
-
—
-
mm
-
mm
-
—
-
1.1
1.2
2.7
2.4
—
-
mm
-
NOX
60
60
61
38
176
126
156
176
146
131
28
32
71
50
31
29
mm
-
— ,
—
—
-
—
-
^
-
—
-
30
52
20
10
mm
-
mm
*
MECH
HC
350
—
450
-
30
190
-
200
-
355
70
160
mm
-
mm
-
—
-
—
-
„
-
•»
-
75
230
-
^
-
^
—
REC
CO
8.4
—
6.8
-
0.1
-
3-2
4.8
-
5.1
-
2.4
-
2.2
mm
-
«•
-
—
-
_
-
_
-
—
-
0.8
-
4.2
—
_
-
—
-
MECH
HC
260
—
230
-
20
-
45
100
-
170
-
50
-
65
_
-
_
-
_
-
_
-
M
-
_
-
100
-
180
—
_
-
_
-
CK AFTER HTTP
CO HC
6.4 250
- 320
0.1 80
- 470
0.1 40
40
0.0 20
20
5.0 95
- 110
1.6 135
- 190
1.6 120
- 140
0.5 220
- 230
_ —
- -
^ M
— —
_ _
- -
_ _
— -
- -
— ••
_ —
- -
1.0 10
10
2.0 40
40
- -
•m* mm
— —
— ~
CO NOX
8.0
7.4
0.1
1.5
0.5
1.2
0.1
0.1
4.8
5.2
2.8
3.4
7.0
7.3
5.8
6.0
-
—
-
—
-
•"
-
mm
-
~
-
^
0.3
00
o
0.4
n it
U.'»
-
-
60
i"
85
52
18
389
$6
64
80
65
56
34
26
68
64
i
-
—
-
*"
-
"
-
-
-
136
179
1 1 J
I
**
-------
APPENDIX M,CONT'D
LISTING OF TWO SPEED IDLE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
NO. YR MAKE MODL MODE HC CO
707"75~MGMIDG 225000 10 0.4
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N) 1(
REPLICATE -
708 75 OPEL 1900 2250(N) 50 0.5
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N) 100 1.9
REPLICATE -
709 75 OPEL STAW 2250(N) 100 4.0
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N) 120 5.0
REPLICATE -
710 75 TOYO STAW 2250(N) 20 0.1
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N) 25 0.1
REPLICATE -
711 75 TOYO CORO 2250(N) 30 0.6
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N) 140 0.9
REPLICATE -
712 75 TOYO CORO 2250(N) 25 0.7
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N) 20 0.7
REPLICATE -
713 75 TOYO CORO 2250(N) 60 0.8
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N) 150 2.1
REPLICATE -
™ 75 VOLK SEDA 2250(N) 190 4.4
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N) 270 5.6
REPLICATE -
715 75 VOLK SEDA 2250(N) 170 4.5
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N) 350 6.0
REPLICATE -
DENVER
:PT
CO
0.4
0.4
0.5
1.9
4.0
5.0
BEFORE MTCE MECH REC
HC CO NOX HC CO
1
-
-
80
10
120
130
4
5
6
6
-
-
.6
.2
.2
.7
_ _ _
_
161 80 3-6
179 -
101 125 4.8
111 -
MECH CK AFTER MTCE
HC CO HC CO NOX
_
_ _ _
65 1.9 30
40
80 1.6 100
50
1
1
1
1
-
-
.6
.4
.6
.4
\
-
136
136
§5
85
25
25
60
80
150
135
0.8
0.7
1.1
1.2
3-1
2.4
195 4.
170 4.i
190
220
445
165
6.0
4.7
65
56
26
28
171
204
68
80
116
121
40
42
70
150
120
180
200
1.3
3.0
3.4
3.9
3.6
30
40
70
80
1.0
0.6
1.9
2.0
110 2.0
145 2.1 150 1.0
10
10
5
9
125
100
690
300
65
105
165
190
0.4
0.6
0.3
0.3
0.2
0.2
0-.3
0.3
2.2
3.6
1.4
1.3
60
56
30
34
138
151
161
25
136
72
78
56
SPEED IDLE TEST RESULTS ARE: HC - PPM/HEXANE, CO - %, UNCORRECTED NOX - PPM
M-39
-------
APPENDIX M,CONT'D
LISTING OF TWO SPEED IDLE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
ACCEPT
NO. YR
716 75
717 75
718 75
719 75
720 75
046 74
047 74
048 74
049 74
MAKE MODL MODE
VOLK SEDA 2250CN)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
VOLK TRAN 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
VOLK RABB 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
VOLK RABB 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
VOLV 242G 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
AMMO HORN 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
BUIC RIVI 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
BUIC CENT 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
CHEV VEGA 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
HC
220
-
260
-
150
320
-
10
-
30
150
-
80
—
40
-
60
-
^
-
—
-
-
-
—
-
^
-
—
-
-
CO
6.0
-
7.5
-
4.4
6.0
-
0.1
-
0.1
-
0.3
1.5
-
0.6
-
1.2
-
^m
-
^
-
-
-
_
-
^
•
_
-
-
BEFORE MTCE
HC
195
200
325
300
130
180
480
540
_
-
_
-
_
-
_
-
_
-
_
-
105
130
220
220
60
75
80
1510
1480
210
205
220
265
260
260
CO
6.0
5.9
7.0
7.2
4.9
5.2
7.0
8.2
—
-
_
-
_
-
_
-
_
-
—
-
1.3
2.2
2.4
2.6
0.4
0.4
0.3
0.3
1.0
1.0
0.8
0.7
4.7
6.1
5-7
6.5
NOX
96
94
54
55
92
79
43
39
_
-
_
-
_
-
_
-
_
-
_
-
348
348
I2
80
222
222
64
89
207
307
40
42
860
634
£
MECH
HC
170
-
215
-
180
350
-
—
-
_
-
—
-
_
-
_
-
—
-
120
-
180
-
125
80
1500
-
210
-
140
-
250
REC
CO
4.5
-
7.4
-
4.8
6.0
-
_
-
_
-
—
-
_
-
_
-
—
-
1.5
1.1
-
0.2
0.3
0.4
-
0.7
0.4
—
6.0
MECH CK
HC CO
180 3.2
- -
160 2.8
- -
80 2.5
65 2.0
- -
— ^
-
— —
- -
_ _
- -
_ _
- -
_ _
- -
v .
- -
110 1.3
-
250 0.5
-
90 0.2
60 0.3
10 0.3
— —
20 0.3
- -
210 2.5
- -
180 1.5
AFTER MTn?
HC
80
90
180
195
70
60
140
110
—
-
_
-
•
-
_
—
_
-
—
—
90
120
140
150
80
75
70
100
20
25
35
35
150
10 f\
80
170
200
CO
3.0
3.0
2.7
2.6
2.7
3.2
3-0
3-2
^
-
—
-
_
-
_
-
-
—
-
—
1.5
1.8
1.4
1^
.3
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.5
Cc
.0
0.3
Ot
.3
3-6
C Q
3-3
«*• Vl_l
NOX
98
75
68
126
108
101
87
_
-
_
-
_
-
_
—
-
—
-
—
307
OllT
2^7
106
m£
1UO
202
222
80
83
81
68
Vv
s
552
222
116
87
TWO SPEED IDLE TEST RESULTS ARE: HC - PPM/HEXANE, CO - %, UNCORRECTED NOX -
M-40
-------
APPENDIX M,CONT'D
LISTING OF TWO SPEED IDLE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
NO. YR MAKE
050 7^ CHEV
051 74 CHEV
052 74 CHEV
053 74 CHEV
054 74 CHEV
055 74 DODG
056 74 DODG
°57 74 FORD
°58 74 FORD
ACCEPT BEFORE MTCE
MODL MODE HC CO HC CO NOX
MONT 2250CN) -
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE -
NOVA 2250(N) -
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE -
CAMA 2250CN) -
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE -
CHEL 2250CN) -
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE -
CAPR 2250(N)
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE -
CHAR 2250CN) -
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE -
DART 2250(N) -
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE -
PINT 2250(N) -
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE -
MAVE 2250(N) -
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE -
25
20
70
60
35
50
70
70
?°
45
55
60
60
25
80
- 65
75
80
- 165
- 178
- 320
- 335
- 190
- 270
90
- 130
- 300
- 355
- 130
- 140
- 155
- 165
- 100
- 105
- 220
- 225
0.6
0.7
1.0
1.1
0.4
0.4
1.2
1.4
0.7
0.9
1.6
1.6
0.4
0.4
2.2
2.1
3.2
3.6
7.8
8.6
4.6
8.0
0.4
0.2
1.5
1.5
7.1
7.5
3.8
3.9
3.1
2.9
4.2
4.9
5.4
5.9
72
79
35
38
202
189
25
28
67
64
38
80
83
82
34
33
101
103
54
55
212
176
70
42
212
186
54
49
108
113
62
59
136
151
66
75
MECH REC
HC CO
50
80
70
90
45
60
30
100
65
170
250
280
160
400
130
150
80
240
0.4
I ""
0.6
0.4
1.0
0.6
1.6
0.2
2.2
2.4
7.2
3-6
0.2
1.1
7.0
2.9
1.8
2.2
6.0
MECH CK
HC CO
70
130
70
120
70
120
30
90
60
55
140
130
100
80
80
130
100
150
0.2
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.1
0.1
0.7
0.1
1.8
0.6
0.8
0.5
2.4
0.6
2.0
0.9
AFTER MTCE
HC CO NOX
45
25
220
210
25
30
70
70
%
80
75
30
20
75
65
TO
55
100
60
190
130
150
105
80
80
115
110
90
200
180
120
160
180
190
0.1
0.4
0.2
0.2
°-?
0.4
0.4
0.5
0.7
0.7
0.8
1.0
0.3
0.3
0.1
0.2
2.2
2.8
1.6
2.0
3-2
3-2
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.0
0.4
0.4
2.4
2.6
3.7
3-2
3.6
4.2
1.7
2.2
68
86
32
39
202
196
27
30
63
72
42
45
81
78
52
53
111
96
64
62
327
266
65
62
440
266
149
103
136
136
53
57
III
11
SPEED IDLE TEST RESULTS ARE: HC - PPM/HEXANE, CO - %, UNCORRECTED NOX - PPM
M-41
-------
APPENDIX M.CONT'D
LISTING OF TWO SPEED IDLE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
ACCEPT BEFORE MTCE
NO. YR
059 74
060 74
061 74
062 74
063 74
064 74
065 74
066 74
067 74
MAKE MODL MODE HC
FORD MAVE 2250(N)
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE -
FORD LTD 2250(N)
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE -
FORD LTD 2250(N) -
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE -
LING CONT 2250(N)
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE -
MERC MONT 2250(N) -
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE -
OLDS CUTL 2250(N) -
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE -
OLDS DELT 2250(N)
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE -
OLDS 98 2250(N) -
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE -
PLYM SATE 2250CN) -
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE -
CO HC
- 105
- 120
- 400
- 330
- 100
- 120
- 315
- 340
60
50
80
70
- 140
- 125
- 210
- 190
- 100
- 115
- 195
- 220
- 100
- 130
- 160
- 180
- 160
- 130
- 130
- 110
- 130
- 170
- 140
- 165
- 140
- 150
- 390
- 320
CO
3.1
3.5
8.6
8.6
1.5
2.3
3.2
3.0
2.2
2.2
2.0
1.2
4.3
4.2
6.2
5.0
1.5
1.9
2.5
2.6
3.6
3.1
2.4
1.8
1.4
3.2
1.0
2.7
2 7
3.8
2.3
2.8
2.3
2.0
0.9
0.7
NOX
191
212
40
35
266
222
44
40
196
196
80
80
138
207
52
62
222
191
64
65
116
103
52
46
39
171
74
71
255
266
57
61
286
409
51
54
MECH
HC
120
-
360
-
160
-
520
-
40
-
100
-
150
-
240
-
90
200
-
130
225
-
110
-
120
-
50
150
—
100
_
700
-
REC
CO
0.0
-
2.8
-
0.6
-
1.7
1.5
-
0.9
3-4
6.2
-
0.7
3-0
2.6
-
3.7
1.6
-
3-8
0.5
1.8
—
1.6
-
0.5
MECH
HC
140
-
125
60
-
70
40
-
100
-
140
-
120
-
70
170
-
140
-
170
-
100
-
70
-
100
-
160
-
60
—
90
-
CK
CO
4.5
2.1
-
1.6
-
0.6
-
1.0
-
0.4
-
2.6
-
0.3
0.6
-
1.5
3.3
0.4
-
0.8
-
0.3
-
0.7
-
0.1
-
1.4
-
0.5
—
AFTRR MTn?
HC
115
145
95
120
60
100
75
110
40
60
80
85
120
110
75
60
90
90
210
190
95
105
125
100
260
130
240
^ r r*
160
160
230
90
170
85
105
90
4 O/>
120
— «•• | a A A \flj
CO NOX
4.7
5.6
2.2
3.0
4.2
1.2
0.8
2.0
1.6
2.5
0.4
1.8
3-1
2.9
0.3
0.4
1.2
1.3
1.8
1.7
3.2
•j ^
3.6
H
0.4
1.1
2rt
.9
1.0
Oo
.3
3.2
7 h
0.1
°'l
2.1
1.8
Of.
.0
0.3
03
• J
"~
116
68
wv
63
95
JJ
121
85
80
225
229
I6
80
179
1%
82
72
212
176
60
—f
56
111
lir
45
57
56
59
222
63
67
u|
266
80
Uv
60
50
./v
225
78
71
TWO SPEED IDLE TEST RESULTS ARE: HC - PPM/HEXANE, CO - $, UNCORRECTED NOX -
M-42
-------
APPENDIX M,CONT'D
LISTING OF TWO SPEED IDLE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
NO. YR MAKE
068 74 PLYM
069 74 PONT
070 74 PONT
071 74 DATS
072 74 MAZD
073 74 TOYO
-------
APPENDIX M,CONT'D
LISTING OF TWO SPEED IDLE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
ACCEPT BEFORE MTCE MECH REC MECH CK AFTER MTCF
NO. YR MAKE MODL MODE HC CO HC CO NOX HC CO HC CO HC CO NOX
3M7~74~CADI~DEVI~i256(N)50~~578------"-I7
REPLICATE ---------___
IDLE(N) 100 1.6 - - - - - - - - .
REPLICATE ----------__
348 74 CHEV MALI 2250(N) 20 0.5 - - - - - - - - - -
REPLICATE ---------_._
IDLE(N) 40 1.2 - - -'- - - - - --
REPLICATE ------------
350 74 CHEV IMPA 2250(N) 50 1.0 - - - - - - - --.
REPLICATE ------------
IDLE(N) 110 1.6 - - - - - - - - --
REPLICATE ------------
351 74 CHEV IMPA 2250(N) 30 0.5- - - - - - - ---
REPLICATE ------------
IDLE(N) 60 1.5- - - - - - - ---
REPLICATE ------------
352 74 CHRY NEWP 2250(N) 150 4.0 335 2.3 222 450 6.5 50 1.2 50 1.3 266
REPLICATE - - 350 2.1 202 - - - - 40 1.1 202
IDLE(N) 475 7.5 580 8.1 31 600 8.0 150 1.5 100 1.1 jjj!
REPLICATE - - 440 7.8 32 - - - - 100 0.9 w
354 74 FORD ELIT 2250(N) 250 4.0 210 2.8 368 150 1.8 175 1.5 250 2.6 225
REPLICATE - - 230 3.6 225 - 220 3-0 131
IDLE(N) 350 6.8 300 8.2 50 280 6.2 225 0.7 260 1.J 50
REPLICATE - - 290 7.6 50 - - - - 260 1.1 ^
355 74 FORD LTD 2250(N) 60 1.1- - - - - - - - - '
REPLICATE ------------
IDLE(N) 250 4.0 ----------
REPLICATE -----------
357 74 MERC COUG 2250(N) 70 0.6- -------'I
REPLICATE -----------
IDLE(N) 50 0.2- - - - - - - ' '
REPLICATE -----------
358 74 OLDS CUTL 2250(N) 60 0.4 - - - - - - - - ~ '.
REPLICATE -----------
IDLE(N) 80 0.7 - - - - - - - " -
REPLICATE ----------
TWO SPEED IDLE TEST RESULTS ARE: HC - PPM/HEXANE, CO - %, UNCORRECTED NOX -
M-44
-------
APPENDIX M,CONT'D
LISTING OF TWO SPEED IDLE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
HO. YR MAKE
721 74 AMMO
722 74 AMMO
723 74 AMMO
724 74 BUIC
725 74 BUIC
726 74 BUIC
MODL MODE
GREM 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
GREM 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
MATA 2250CN)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
APOL 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
LASA 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
ELEC 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
ACCEPT
HC CO
160
540
40
70
70
170
300
720
40
60
45
75
4.6
9.6
0.2
0.5
1.0
2.0
5.2
10.0
0.1
0.5
0.4
0.6
BEFORE MTCE MECH REC
HC CO NOX HC CO
90
130
460
110
M
-
-
_
130
230
380
540
_
-
-
-
4.0
4.2
9.8
9.6
w
-
..
-
4.6
4.8
9.0
9.6
_
-
-
-
126 120 3-8
131 -
24 700 10.0
21
« • •»
- - -
» _ _
-
78 195 4.2
72 -
35 400 9.8
29 -
-
_
_ — _
_ _ _
MECH CK AFTER MTCE
HC CO HC CO NOX
60 2.5 115 3-8
- 140 4.0
140 1.5 140 1.4
- 140 1.7
_
_ _ _ _
— ~ •» *~
_ _ _ _
20 0.5 40 0.4
35 0.5
85 0.3 200 0.2
- 170 0.2
_ _ _ _
— _ —
_ _ _ _
-
171
141
54
49
-
-
-
_
84
86
5S
58
-
—
-
-
727 74 CADI DEVI 2250(N) 20 0.6
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
50 0.6 -
72874 CHEV VEGA 2250(N) 300 8.0
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N) 700 1.1
REPLICATE -
729 74 CHEV VEGA 2250(N) 100 3.0
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N) 140 2.2
REPLICATE -
240
320
600
330
6.2
7.2
1.7
3.7
126 260
106 -
90 1000
75 -
3.0 245 1.8
0.6 275 0.9
120
170
200
210
0.7
1.0
SPEED IDLE TEST RESULTS ARE: HC - PPM/HEXANE, CO - %, UNCORRECTED NOX - PPM
171
106
68
78
M-45
-------
APPENDIX M,CONT'D
LISTING OF TWO SPEED IDLE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
ACCEPT BEFORE MTCE MECH REC MECH CK AFTER MICE
NO. YR MAKE MODL MODE HC CO HC CO NOX HC CO HC CO HC CO NOX
730~74~CHEV~NOVA 2250(N) 30 "57?--- - - ----I"
REPLICATE ---------___
IDLE(N) 60 2.2- - - - - - - --_
REPLICATE ---------___
731 74 CHEV NOVA 2250(N) 70 0.9 20 0.7 65 120 0.6 50 0.4 140 0.6 64
REPLICATE - - 50 0.9 62 - - - - 50 1.0 56
IDLE(N) 440 0.4 300 0.2 37 750 0.4 265 0.2 225 0.5 39
REPLICATE - - 375 0.3 36 - - - - 300 0.8 27
732 74 CHEV NOVA 2250(N) 500 3-0 370 4.5 82 110 2.0 260 3-3 240 5.6 66
REPLICATE - - 600 6.2 33 - - - - 400 6.4 62
IDLE(N) 2000 9.0 2000 9.5 16 2000 9.0 1900 2.7 2000 4.2 36
REPLICATE - - 2000 10.0 34 - 2000 4.7 34
733 74 CHEV MONT 2250(N) 40 1.2- - - - - - - _-.
REPLICATE ------------
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
70 1.4 -
734 74 CHEV MALI 2250(N) 175 1.5 -
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N) 145 1.2 -
REPLICATE -
735 74 CHEV NOVA 2250(N) 28 0.6 -
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
55 0.7 -
736 74 CHEV NOVA 2250(N) 15 0.3 -
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
60 1.2 -
737 74 CHEV IMPA 2250(N) 30 0.4 -
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
70 1.3 -
738 74 DODG CHAL 2250(N) 250 4.0 -
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N) 230 3.6 -
REPLICATE -
TWO SPEED IDLE TEST RESULTS ARE: HC - PPM/HEXANE, CO - %, UNCORRECTED NOX -
M-46
-------
APPENDIX M,CONT'D
LISTING OF TWO SPEED IDLE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
NO. YR MAKE
739 74 DODG
740 74 DODG
741 74 FORD
712 74 FORD
713 74 FORD
711 74 FORD
715 74 FORD
716 74 FORD
^ 74 FORD
MODL MODE
CHAR 2250 (N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
DART 2250 (N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
PINT 2250 (N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
PINT 2250 (N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
PINT 2250 (N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
PINT 2250 (N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
MUST 2250 (N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
MAVE 2250 (N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
MUST 2250 (N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
ACCEPT
HC CO
180
220
110
215
210
405
230
290
275
350
250
400
150
80
100
210
100
90
4.2
3.7
1.4
4.8
2.9
0.4
5.5
4.8
8.5
9.0
8.5
10.0
2.0
1.6
2.5
4.9
2.0
2.2
BEFORE MTCE
HC CO NOX
-
_
170
250
280
350
w
—
300
330
310
340
170
70
300
300
^
—
-
urn
-
-
-
-
4.2
3.9
3.0
3.0
•
••
l-Q
8.2
I-6
8.0
7.0
7.0
10.0
10.0
-
—
-
-
^
-
-
_
32
25
25
25
_
-
48
60
P
72
70
25
25
_
-
-
-
M.
^
MECH REC
HC CO
_
_ _
160 2.5
270 2.2
-
-
270 7.2
310 7.0
100 7.3
320 10.0
-
-
_ _
— —
_
: :
MECH CK AFTER MTCE
HC CO HC CO NOX
-
-
175
145
-
-
350
230
150
220
-
-
-
-
•»
-
-
- -
2.5 180
- 180
0.3 210
- 220
_ .
-
6.3 200
- 250
1.5 180
- 180
3.5 105
- 135
0.7 100
- 110
-
- -
-
-
-
<« ^
-
-
4.8
4.6
1.5
1.4
_
-
7.0
6.7
3.6
3.0
?.4
4.2
3.4
3.8
«*
-
-
MW
•»
-
-
-
45
35
31
24
-
_
73
78
45
51
106
92
i
-
-
-
-
-
im
IDLE TEST RESULTS ARE: HC - PPM/HEXANE, CO - %, UNCORRECTED NOX - PPM
M-47
-------
APPENDIX M,CONT'D
LISTING OF TWO SPEED IDLE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
ACCEPT BEFORE MTCE MECH REC MECH CK AFTER MICE
NO. YR MAKE MODL MODE HC CO HC CO NOX HC CO HC CO HC CO NOX
748 7FORDMAv250(N)80oo6oo o. 645500q4
REPLICATE - - 2000 0.4 593 - - - - 920 0.6 389
IDLE(N) 1000 4.1 630 3.9 55 500 4.1 260 1.9 400 2.5 62
REPLICATE - - 960 3.9 53 - - - - 320 2.6 7$
749 74 FORD TORI 2250(N) 100 1.0- - - - - - - --_
• REPLICATE ----------__
IDLE(N) 150 0.7 - - - - - - - - -
REPLICATE ------------
750 74 FORD TORI 2250(N) 135 3-5 - - - - - - - - -
REPLICATE ------------
IDLE(N) 135 1.5 ----------
REPLICATE ------------
751 74 FORD TORI 2250(N) 110 3.2 ----------
REPLICATE ------------
IDLE(N) 50 0.4 - - - - - - - ---
REPLICATE ------------
752 74 FORD LTD 2250(N) 110 1.4- - - - - - - - --
REPLICATE ------------
IDLE(N) 140 1.6- - - - - - - - - -
REPLICATE ------------
753 74 FORD STAW 2250(N) 740 1.7 100 0.5 3891150 2.0 350 1.1 610 1.8 3§9
REPLICATE - - 95 0.6 348 - - - - 210 2.8 286
IDLE(N) 480 3-3 60 1.2 74 550 5.5 180 0.4 115 0.4 84
REPLICATE - - 90 1.3 70 - - - - 180 0.6 86
754 74 MERC COME 2250(N) 170 2.5 - - - - - - - - - '
REPLICATE ------------
IDLE(N) 330 0.5 - - - - - - - - "
REPLICATE ------------
755 74 MERC COUG 2250(N) 20 0.5- - - - - - - - - '
REPLICATE ------------
IDLE(N) 85 0.3- - - - - - - ~ ~ I
REPLICATE -----------
756 74 OLDS CUTL 2250(N) 80 0.9- --------I
REPLICATE -----------
IDLE(N) 180 3.2 - - - - - - - - " I
REPLICATE -----------
TWO SPEED IDLE TEST RESULTS ARE: HC - PPM/HEXANE, CO - 56, UNCORRECTED NOX -
M-48
-------
APPENDIX M,CONT'D
LISTING OF TWO SPEED IDLE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
NO. YR
75774
75874
75974
76074
761 74
762 74
76374
76H7H
76574
MAKE MODL MODE
OLDS CUTL 2250 (N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
OLDS CUTL 2250 (N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
PLYM DUST 2250 (N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
PLYM DUST 2250 (N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
PLYM DUST 2250 (N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
PLYM FRY3 2250 (N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
PLYM FURY 2250 (N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
PONT FIRE 2250 (N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
PONT LEMA 2250 (N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
ACCEPT
HC CO
110
280
100
410
190
270
130
405
2000
500
90
340
120
210
100
230
80
300
1.0
5.6
0.3
0.4
1.7
3.6
2.2
5.2
0.5
8.2
1.8
7.0
2.0
2.4
4.0
5.0
3.4
7.8
BEFORE MTCE
HC CO NOX
90
100
220
230
40
140
300
370
_
_
155
190
240
265
2000
2000
450
400
125
140
110
130
—
-
-
-
75
110
305
320
1.3
1.1
4.9
4.6
1.2
1.7
1.5
1.6
-
_
1.9
2.5
5.4
5.9
1.7
1.5
7.0
6.8
0.8
1.1
2.4
2.4
— ,
-
^
-
3.1
3.4
8.2
8.4
161
149
53
52
156
54
60
22
_
_
655
593
g
266
409
34
32
245
212
36
34
—
-
-
-
86
78
40
38
MECH REC
HC CO
50
310
50
200
_
_
225
310
50
250
750
445
—
-
-
-
140
400
Q.4
5.4
0.6
0.8
_
_
2.0
5.8
0.7
7.0
2.2
9.6
—
-
m ,
-
2.5
8.7
MECH CK
HC CO
90
200
40
130
-
_
150
130
140
110
300
150
—
-
—
-
110
180
0.8
0.4
0.5
0.2
_
_
1.0
0.6
2.8
0.6
1.0
1.7
—
-
-
-
2.3
0.4
AFTER MTCE
HC CO NOX
70
100
75
90
25
50
120
150
_
_
110
130
150
200
180
150
80
110
780
790
450
480
_
-
—
-
80
130
160
210
1.2
2.0
0.6
0.4
0.5
0.9
0.1
0.1
_
_
1.1
1.5
0.8
0.8
3.0
3.6
0.5
0.6
2.9
3.1
2.1
2.6
-
-
-
:
2.7
3.5
0.3
0.4
136
121
62
62
146
164
44
53
-
_
634
481
116
92
239
255
66
52
199
164
40
41
-
-
-
-
101
84
58
50
0 SPEED IDLE TEST RESULTS ARE: HC - PPM/HEXANE, CO - %, UNCORRECTED NOX - PPM
M-49
-------
APPENDIX M,CONT'D ,
LISTING OF TWO SPEED IDLE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
NO. YR MAKE MODL MODE
ACCEPT BEFORE MTCE MECH REC MECH CK AFTER MTCE
HC CO HC CO NOX HC CO HC CO HC CO MOX
766 74 PONT CATA 2250(N) 100 3-9
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N) 230 5.3
REPLICATE -
767 74 PONT LEMA 2250(N) 50 0.5
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N) 150 2.0
REPLICATE -
768 74 AUDI 100L 2250(N) 90 1.6
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N) 60 4.0
REPLICATE -
769 74 CAPR SPOR 2250(N) 30 0.8
REPLICATE -
770
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
74 COLT SEDA 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
60
-
75
475
0.1
-
4.8
-
8.1
-
_
-
140
220
470
560
_
-
4.8
5.0
9.2
9.2
_
-
85
80
26
26
_
-
185
-
470
-
_
-
4.0
-
8.4
-
_
-
135
250
-
_
-
4.0
-
3-5
—
-
85
130
60
225
-
-
3.4
4.2
4.2
_ /•
5.6
-
—
88
rt h
74
48
12
771 74 DATS SEDA 2250(N) 190 2.4
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N) 280 4.0
REPLICATE -
772 74 DATS 710 2250(N) 180 2.2
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N) 290 3-2
REPLICATE -
773 74 FIAT 128 2250(N) 60 2.8
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N) 130 3.2
REPLICATE -
774 74 FIAT 128 2250(N) 500 3.3 60 0.8 48 100 2.2 45 4.2 0 2.0
REPLICATE -
60 1.0 30 -
120
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
700 9.3 150 2.3 20 300 5.5 80 1.7 65 j-jj \\
- - 170 2.2 15 - - - - 65° '
TWO SPEED IDLE TEST RESULTS ARE: HC - PPM/HEXANE, CO - %, UNCORRECTED NOX - ?™
M-50
-------
APPENDIX M,CONT'D
LISTING OF TWO SPEED IDLE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
ACCEPT BEFORE MTCE MECH REC MECH CK
NO. YR MAKE MODL MODE HC CO HC CO NOX HC CO HC CO
775 74 MERE 280 2250(N) 100 1.1 -
REPLICATE ---------
IDLE(N) 280 5.0 -
REPLICATE ---------
776 74 TOYO CORO 2250(N) 280 5.6 220 6.0 138 295 5.5 240 4.7
REPLICATE - - 230 5.8 141
IDLE(N) 650 0.2 300 0.3 87 300 1.5 310 1.0
REPLICATE - - 330 0.3 8$ -
777 74 TOYO CORO 2250(N) 240 8.0 255 8.1 60 200 3-1 200 2.5
REPLICATE - - 260 8.0 63 -
IDLE(N) 780 10.0 710 10.0 21 330 5.4 200 1.4
REPLICATE - - 750 10.0 26 -
778 74 VOLK SEDA 2250CN) 280 3-2 -
REPLICATE ---------
IDLE(N) 130 2.3 -
REPLICATE ---------
779 74 VOLK 412 2250(N) 100 2.0 -
REPLICATE ---------
IDLE(N) 220 2.4 -
REPLICATE ---------
78074VOLV142 2250(N) 150 4.5 40 1.3 126 160 4.0 120 2.2
REPLICATE - - 50 1.2 106 -
IDLE(N) 190 5.6 50 1.6 78 180 5.5 150 1.5
REPLICATE -
55 1.5 70 -
101 73 AMMO HORN 2250(N) -
REPLICATE - - 1160
900 0.9 634 1350 0.8 40 1.0
"- 1.4 511 -
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE -
1Q2 73 BUIC ELEC 2250(N) -
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE -
103 73 CADI DEVI 2250(N) -
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE -
305 6.1 63 360 7.2 150 1.2
350 7.0 63 -
45 0.6 94 70 0.3 80 0.4
45 0.6 101 -
80 0.5 50 90 0.6 70 0.5
85 0.5 56 -
25 1.4 70 30 0.2 100 0.5
15 1.1 78 -
95 1.9 31 140 2.2 130 0.4
90 2.5 34 -
AFTER MTCE
HC CO NOX
155
190
230
240
260
270
350
5.6 118
5.4 121
2.0
1.6
5.4
6.0
3.6
3.7
100 0.9
110 0.9
150 0.8
140 1.3
0 0.4
0 0.6
SPEED IDLE TEST RESULTS ARE: HC - PPM/HEXANE, CO - %, UNCORRECTED NOX - PPM
60
60
46
38
28
65 2.0 141
90 2.0 113
80 2.1 196
60 1.9 22
73
7
25 0.5 106
40 0.6 90
45 0.6
50 0.4
0 0.7 111
8 0.9 94
42
43
M-51
-------
APPENDIX M,CONT'D
LISTING OF TWO SPEED IDLE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
NO. YR
104 73
105 73
106 73
107 73
108 73
109 73
110 73
111 73
112 73
ACCEPT
MAKE MODL MODE HC CO
CHEV VEGA 2250(N) -
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE -
CHEV MALI 2250(N)
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE -
CHEV NOVA 2250(N) -
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE -
CHEV IMPA 2250(N) -
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE -
CHEV IMPA 2250(N) -
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE -
CHEV IMPA 2250(N)
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE -
DODG DART 2250(N) -
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE -
FORD PINT 2250(N) -
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE -
FORD TORI 2250(N) -
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE -
BEFORE MTCE
HC
150
150
260
270
25
25
80
75
30
40
100
100
100
115
210
380
20
20
50
50
30
20
48
35
240
230
400
400
215
270
250
250
105
160
250
260
CO
4.5
5.5
6.6
7.4
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.9
0.9
1.0
0.6
0.6
0.8
0.4
0.3
0.3
0.4
0.5
1.4
1.4
0.3
0.4
1.4
1.6
3-6
3.9
8.4
8.1
6.5
7.4
6.0
6.0
2.5
3.4
2".8
NOX
138
131
78
78
49
76
29
30
0
64
66
44
43
i*y Q
i O
86
52
58
9
73
32
36
111
103
38
42
450
522
ii
136
106
58
55
181
171
47
48
MECH
HC
180
-
280
—
30
70
50
-
115
100
-
150
30
60
-
20
50
200
-
350
200
-
230
-
70
250
REC
CO
5-0
6.6
—
0.6
-
0.4
-
0.6
—
0.4
-
0.2
-
0.3
0.4
-
1.1
-
0.5
1.6
-
3.0
0.7
6.2
-
5.8
1.3
2.0
MECH
HC
130
-
110
-
30
-
50
-
60
-
90
20
-
70
35
70
20
55
150
-
150
320
-
270
-
50
110
CK
CO
3.6
0.8
-
0.3
0.4
-
0.4
-
0.4
-
0.3
0.4
-
0.3
-
0.3
0.3
0.5
—
0.7
-
0.2
5.0
—
1.2
-
1.0
0.1
AFTRR MTri?
HC
120
125
145
155
25
35
45
45
25
20
50
35
50
30
90
70
30
35
80
80
25
20
50
50
145
155
90
100
260
290
160
155
60
130
60
85
CO NOX
5.2
6.2
2.2
1.0
0.6
0.7
0.9
1.1
0.6
0.6
0.9
1.0
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.6
0.6
0.3
0.3
0.9
1.0
2.2
2f*
.3
0.3
0.3
6.0
74
• 1
0.3
00
o
1:8
1.3
2.3
138
146
88
113
76
73
46
63
70
46
48
108
73
69
79
11
88
40
ii/t
42
13]
116
46
46
788
71b
103
91
296
ill
l*t i
s
146
81
73
TWO SPEED IDLE TEST RESULTS ARE: HC - PPM/HEXANE, CO - %, UNCORRECTED NOX -
M-52
-------
APPENDIX M,CONT'D
LISTING OF TWO SPEED IDLE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
NO. YR MAKE
113 73 FORD
114 73 FORD
115 73 FORD
116 73 MERC
117 73 OLDS
118 73 OLDS
119 73 PLYM
120 73 PLYM
121 73 PONT
ACCEPT BEFORE MTCE
MODL MODE HC CO HC CO NOX
MAVE 2250(N) -
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE -
GUST 2250(N) -
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE -
LTD 2250CN) -
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE -
MONR 2250(N) -
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE -
98 2250(N) -
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE -
CUTL 2250(N) -
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE -
SATE 2250(N) -
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE -
DUST 2250(N) -
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE -
CATA 2250(N)
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE -
- 120
- 130
- 260
- 390
- 170
- 260
- 510
- 600
- 110
100
- 250
- 270
- 120
- 100
- 165
- 155
60
- 65
42
60
90
- 110
120
- 140
- 130
- 100
- 220
- 205
75
- 110
- 165
160
30
30
- 170
- 160
?-8
4.7
6.3
7.5
^•5
4.8
10.0
10.0
1.7
2.0
8.9
9.4
1.4
1.9
3-2
3.4
1.6
1.6
0.4
0.3
4.2
3.9
1.6
2.2
2.4
3.1
7.1
7.6
0.3
0.1
2.5
2.1
0.4
0.4
2.7
2.8
99
92
11
161
166
29
32
430
327
8
368
368
63
66
229
255
a
131
84
88
86
247
154
53
57
871
1219
64
72
128
89
57
§2
MECH REG
HC CO
120
290
300
620
60
280
90
160
40
70
50
160
70
230
100
170
50
185
2.2
6.0
5.0
10.0
1.2
5.0
0.8
1.7
0.7
1.2
0.8
2.3
1.1
7.0
0.2
2.0
0.6
2.6
MECH CK
HC CO
110
180
120
140
20
10
200
130
85
200
60
90
60
50
80
70
80
100
1.5
1.0
3.0
0.7
0.7
0.4
0.8
0.4
1.8
0.3
0.6
0.5
0.7
0.3
0.2
0.5
0.2
0.3
AFTER MTCE
HC CO NOX
70
130
130
200
160
120
150
140
25
390
110
100
250
250
115
110
50
75
120
110
120
115
80
90
75
90
90
210
g
90
90
60
15
120
100
2.0
4.1
2.6
5.5
2.8
3-2
1.4
1.1
2.1
2.1
0.6
1.4
1.8
1.9
1.5
1.3
2.5
3.2
0.2
0.5
1.7
2.2
0.3
0.2
1.8
1.8
°-l
0.8
0.3
0.3
0.7
0.7
1.0
0.4
0.4
0.9
573
123
59
327
186
93
93
242
430
78
90
23li
51
70
121
111
58
60
199
224
6?
66
161
266
70
66
522
563
$4
143
151
68
67
SPEED IDLE TEST RESULTS ARE: HC - PPM/HEXANE, CO - 56, UNCORRECTED NOX - PPM
M-53
-------
APPENDIX M.CONT'D
LISTING OF TWO SPEED IDLE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
NO.
122
123
124
125
126
127
366
368
371
YR MAKE MODL MODE
73 PONT LEMA 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
73 DATS TRUC 2250(N)
' REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
73 OPEL MANT 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
73 TOYO CORO 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
73 VOLK KOMB 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
73 VOLK SEDA 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
73 BUIC CENT 2250CN)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
73 BUIC ELEC 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
73 CHEV MALI 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
ACCEPT BEFORE MTCE
HC CO HC CO NOX
75
90
- 150
140
- 205
- 230
- 600
- 880
- 180
- 180
- 390
- 340
- I 65
- 230
- 240
20
10
30
20
- 115
- 115
- 200
- 190
90 0.4 -
110 1.2 -
40 1.6 -
120 2.3 -
30 0.6 -
60 1.5 -
2.6
2.7
3.0
2.9
2.1
2.1
0.5
0.5
4.8
5.3
10.0
9.9
1.8
2.6
5.6
4.4
1.4
1.2
1.7
1.5
2.4
3.2
5.5
5.6
-
-
-
-
-
-
116
99
11
161
121
71
59
93
101
40
23
116
103
53
53
70
77
59
61
164
154
69
75
-
_
_
_
_
-
MECH REC
HC CO
70 3.0
155 3.2
150 2.2
430 1.2
180 4.4
230 9.6
120 2.8
550 9.8
0 0.7
30 1.4
180 2.0
140 2.2
-
_ _
-
-
_ _
-
MECH
HC
100
170
200
320
110
80
160
260
0
20
120
100
-
_
_
_
-
-
CK
CO
2.5
0.3
3-0
1.5
2.6
2.2
1.8
1.4
0.4
1.0
1.2
1.4
—
-
—
-
-
-
AFTER MTCE
HC CO NOX
85
100
180
210
345
365
730
620
145
140
100
90
11
460
450
10
10
40
55
120
240
310
370
-
-
-
-
—
-
2.
2.
0.
0.
3.
0.
0.
4.
4.
1.
2.
1.
2.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
1.
?:
-
—
-
-
-
-
4
8
1
2
2
1
9
0
2
8
2
9
3
4
4
5
4
3
6
6
8
0
103
85
S8
47
66
84
30
48
92
108
60
60
128
128
57
57
98
103
95
106
176
70
60
146
"
-
-
-
-
-
TWO SPEED IDLE TEST RESULTS ARE: HC - PPM/HEXANE, CO - %, UNCORRECTED NOX -
M-54
-------
APPENDIX M,CONT'D
LISTING OF TWO SPEED IDLE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
ACCEPT
NO. YR MAKE MODL MODE HC CO
DENVER
BEFORE MTCE
HC CO NOX
MECH REC MECH CK AFTER MTCE
HC CO HC CO HC CO NOX
375 73 DODG
377 73 FORD
379 73 FORD
380 73 FORD
CHAR 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
PINT 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
LTD 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
THND 2250CN)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
150
300
110
170
60
80
100
230
4.2 220
- 220
5.6 250
- 260
4.0 120
185
7.0 220
- 250
1.0 -
0.3 -
3-6 950
- 600
6.9 1800
- 1500
2.2
2.9
4.8
5.0
6.8
6.9
9.6
9.8
-
-
4.2
1.4
9-0
9.0
232
156
45
53
103
96
56
49
_
_
101
85
20
22
240
240
170
200
—
«
250
1000
1.7
3.9
4.3
8.1
-
_
4.0
10.0
80
150
250
110
_
«
100
220
0.9
0.3
2.5
0.3
-
-
4.0
0.2
120
145
100
120
260
300
130
115
_
_
55
85
190
175
2.2
2.6
1.0
1.3
4.9
5.8
0.4
0.4
-
-
2.6
3.7
0.2
0.2
242
161
62
59
181
146
58
65
-
-
101
94
48
48
382 73 OLDS CUTL 2250(N) 150 2.0
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N) 350 0.3
REPLICATE -
383 73 OLDS 98 2250(N) 50 0.7
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N) 90 0.2
REPLICATE -
387 73 CAPR 2000 2250(N) 100 3.3
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N) 200 2.1
REPLICATE -
781 73 AMMO HORN 2250(N) 400 6.0
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N) 190 4.5
REPLICATE -
782 73 AMMO HORN 2250(N) 60 0.7
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N) 240 7.4
REPLICATE -
30 0.5 68 40 0.3 60 0.4 30 0.4 136
60 0.5 64 - - - - 60 0.4 131
175 5.2 24 170 5.6 280 0.5 235 0.5 58
225 6.1 22 - - - - 210 0.4 62
SPEED IDLE TEST RESULTS ARE: HC - PPM/HEXANE, CO - %, UNCORRECTED NOX - PPM
M-55
-------
APPENDIX M,CONT'D
LISTING OF TWO SPEED IDLE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
NO.
783
784
785
786
787
788
789
790
791
YR MAKE MODL MODE
73 AMMO MATA 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
73 BUIC CENT 2250(N)
• REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
73 BUIC CENT 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
73 BUIC LESA 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
73 BUIC LESA 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
73 CADI DEVI 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
73 CADI DEVI 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
73 CHEV VEGA 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
73 CHEV VEGA 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
ACCEPT
HC CO
45
120
80
80
50
65
30
70
70
85
380
1400
80
170
250
750
1000
620
3-2
2.4
0.8
0.9
0.4
1.4
0.8
1.0
0.7
2.1
1.8
3.6
1.8
4.6
3.8
10.0
8.2
4.2
BEFORE MTCE
HC CO NOX
-
—
160
160
530
11bO
-
-
150
270
720
2000
120
145
110
100
-
-
1.1
1.1
3.6
3.2
-
-
4.5
5.2
10.0
10.0
3-8
3.3
2.6
2.3
-
-
81
89
20
23
-
:
11
38
32
11
MECH REC
HC CO
•• -»
100 1.4
780 7.0
- -
-
280 5.6
970 10.0
210 6.4
150 1.6
MECH
HC
—
90
200
-
-
135
320
260
110
CK AFTER MICE
CO HC CO NO)
-
-
1.0 190
- 370
1.0 2000
- 2000
- -
— w
3.2 100
- 130
0.9 130
- 150
6.2 £0
-
_
1.8
1.7
0.5
0.6
-
-
3.2
3-8
2.2
4.2
2-2
2.3
0.2
0.5
-
69
76
99
126
-
—
121
113
I
141
111
106
96
TWO SPEED IDLE TEST RESULTS ARE: HC - PPM/HEXANE, CO - %, UNCORRECTED NOX -
M-56
-------
APPENDIX M,CONT'D
LISTING OF TWO SPEED IDLE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
ACCEPT BEFORE MTCE MECH REC MECH CK AFTER MTCE
NO. YR MAKE MODL MODE HC CO HC CO NOX HC CO HC CO HC CO NOX
ToT^'cHEV VEGA 2250(N) 1400 9.0 -
REPLICATE ------------
IDLE(N) 320 2.6 ----------
REPLICATE ------------
793 73 CHEV NOVA 2250(N) 50 0.9 ----------
REPLICATE ------------
IDLE(N) 100 1.4 -
REPLICATE ------------
79^ 73 CHEV NOVA 2250(N) 60 0.5 ----------
REPLICATE ------------
IDLE(N) 100 0.6 ----------
REPLICATE ------------
795 73 CHEV NOVA 2250(N) 500 0.2 220 0.4 106 400 0.3 40 0.3 30 0.3 103
REPLICATE - - 380 0.4 85 - - - - 30 0.4 68
IDLE(N) 950 0.3 1660 0.8 46 1700 0.5 150 1.0 120 0.8 36
REPLICATE - - 1360 0.7 34 - - - - 60 1.4 33
796 73 CHEV NOVA 2250(N) 50 0.6 ----------
REPLICATE ------------
IDLE(N) 50 1.9 -
REPLICATE ------------
797 73 CHEV CAPR 2250(N) 30 0.5 ----------
REPLICATE ------------
IDLE(N) 50 1.0 ----------
REPLICATE ------------
798 73 CHEV CHEL 2250(N) 15 0.2 ----------
REPLICATE ------------
IDLE(N) 350 0.1 -
REPLICATE ------------
799 73 CHEV NOVA 2250(N) 30 0.1----------
REPLICATE ------------
IDLE(N) 100 3.0 ----------
REPLICATE ------------
800 73 CHEV MALI 2250(N) 90 0.2 ----------
REPLICATE ------------
IDLE(N) 150 0.5 ----------
REPLICATE ------------
0 SPEED IDLE TEST RESULTS ARE: HC - PPM/HEXANE, CO - %, UNCORRECTED NOX - PPM
M-57
-------
APPENDIX M,CONT'D
LISTING OF TWO SPEED IDLE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
NO. YR MAKE MODL MODE
801 73 CHEV LAGU 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
802 73 CHEV IMPA 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
803 73 CHEV IMPA 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
804 73 CHEV IMPA 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
805 73 CHEV MONT 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
806 73 CHEV IMPA 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
807 73 CHEV IMPA 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
808 73 CHEV STAW 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
809 73 CHRY NEWP 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
ACCEPT BEFORE MTCE MECH REC MECH CK
HC CO HC CO NOX HC CO HC CO
AFTER MTCE
HC CO NOX
50 0.2 - - - - - - - - _
80 0.1---- -----.
60 0.4 ----------
80 0.6 - - - - - - - -..
180 3.8 - - - - - - - --.
350 4.6 ----------
60 0.8--- -------
100 1.9 - - - - - - - - - -
40 0.2 ----------
70 4.8 - - - - - - - - - -
30 0.3 ------- - - -
85 1.7 -------- - -
140 0.6 --------- -
220 0.4 - - - - - - - - '_
20 0.8 30 0.6 86 300 0.6 60 1.8 100 0.8 88
20 0.8 83 - 105 O-8 "
800 1.8 1250 1.8 12 1200 1.8 220 1.3 1380 ]•? $
- 1280 1.8 15 - - - - 840 M *
100 2.0 420 2.0 348 70 1.3 180 1.2 130 2.6 2
- 450 2.5 389 - l65 3<
i.f
310 6.7 330 6.4 46 235 4.2 220 0.5 175 O.g 50
- - 340 6.8 26- - - - i f u •
TWO SPEED IDLE TEST RESULTS ARE: HC - PPM/HEXANE, CO - %, UNCORRECTED NOX -
M-58
-------
APPENDIX M,CONT'D
LISTING OF TWO SPEED IDLE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
NO. YR MAKE MODL MODE
810 73 CHRY NEWY 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
811 73 DODG DART 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
812 73 DODG DART 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
813 73 DODG CHAR 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
814 73 DODG DART 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
815 73 FORD PINT 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
W 73 FORD PINT 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
817 73 FORD STAW 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
818 73 FORD PINT 2250CN)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
ACCEPT
HC CO
300
1100
400
440
80
210
700
1600
200
275
230
230
200
195
250
170
280
100
4.4
0.3
6.0
6.4
0.8
7.2
8.0
6.4
4.2
8.2
5.4
3.4
7.5
4.5
5.5
3.6
4.2
0.3
BEFORE MTCE
HC CO NOX
140
300
350
320
1500
170
200
210
100
130
30
200
620
740
2000
2000
120
160
280
290
-
—
-
—
-
-
-
-
3.2
4.2
0.3
0.3
0.9
1.3
2.8
5.2
1-2
1.8
0.3
5.8
3.6
5.0
4.4
6.8
2.6
3.1
?:?
-
-
_
^
-
;
-
-
348
225
46
36
60
542
20
20
245
69
16
42
176
166
50
52
358
296
11
—
-
_
-
—
^
_
-
MECH REC MECH CK
HC CO HC CO
200
700
160
300
150
250
520
1520
100
310
„.
-
-
-
_
-
_
-
2.4 100
2.0 120
0.5 150
2.5 110
1.8 140
7.5 110
2.0 500
2.6 1200
2.4 175
8.0 150
-
- -
- -
-
-
- -
_ „
- -
2.5
1.5
0.7
0.5
1.7
0.4
2.0
0.5
1.5
0.5
-
_
-
_
-
—
-
-
AFTER MTCE
HC CO NOX
80
100
100
110
130
180
120
160
100
110
80
265
480
1260
1200
155
140
130
120
_
„
_
_
-
—
-
-
3.2
3.8
2.4
3.6
0.8
1.5
0.4
1.5
1.6
1.9
0.2
0.3
3.4
3.4
3.0
3.0
2.6
2.9
0.6
0.6
_
-
_
-
_
_
-
:
245
111
60
44
593
614
75
75
337
327
S
95
90
42
52
169
286
72
77
_
_
_
-
_
-
-
:
spEED IDLE TEST RESULTS ARE: HC - PPM/HEXANE, CO - %, UNCORRECTED NOX - PPM
M-59
-------
APPENDIX M,CONT'D
LISTING OF TWO SPEED IDLE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
NO.
819
820
821
822
823
824
825
826
827
YR MAKE MODL MODE
73 FORD MAVE 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
73 FORD MAVE 2250(N)
. REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
73 FORD MAVE 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
73 FORD MAVE 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
73 FORD MUST 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
73 FORD MAVE 2250 (N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
73 FORD MAVE 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
73 FORD LTD 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
73 FORD LTD 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
ACCEPT
HC CO
135
230
150
210
60
255
220
490
1000
1050
120
230
120
100
80
180
100
250
1.6
4.4
5.2
5.9
1.5
7.6
2.0
2.5
3-2
6.2
4.0
5.6
7.0
4.2
2.8
6.0
3.0
4.2
BEFORE MTCE
HC CO NOX
-
-
120
175
210
240
140
140
245
280
160
215
820
610
820
820
1020
1180
90
90
230
205
-
-
80
90
220
210
-
-
_
-
6.0
6.6
6.6
7.2
2.8
3.0
7.2
7.5
3-2
5-3
2.4
4.2
2.1
3.3
?:?
3.2
3.7
5.8
6.1
-
-
3.0
3.0
7.6
7.2
-
-
_
_
111
74
ft
81
79
?i
46
327
378
§7
62
242
196
38
38
126
121
50
52
_
-
146
121
51
50
_
-
MECH
HC
—
•»
120
80
130
335
165
500
900
800
100
250
_
-
100
270
-
-
REG MECH
CO HC
- -
_ _
3.0 80
2.8 100
2.2 70
8.0 110
1.9 160
1.9 270
1.7 1100
5.7 980
2.3 90
5.0 220
_ _
-
3.2 80
9.0 130
_ _
-
CK
CO
—
_
0.7
3.0
0.6
0.5
2.4
2.2
2.2
2.9
2.0
0.3
—
^
3-0
0.3
-
— ,
AFTER WTCE
HC CO NOX
-
—
150
190
200
180
90
120
180
170
140
240
280
260
960
920
980
980
100
140
130
150
-
«
20
20
40
50
—
—
-
m
5.6
6.5
1.8
2.8
1.8
1.5
1.0
0.4
3.8
5.8
1.2
1.8
2.4
3.0
4.2
4.4
3.6
4.6
4.0
4.2
—
—
0.8
0.7
0.1
0.1
-
-
-
-
138
101
62
54
181
131
68
60
286
176
60
62
76
72
W
50
106
85
60
55
-
" *
181
126
48
10
-
-
TWO SPEED IDLE TEST RESULTS ARE: HC - PPM/HEXANE, CO - $, UNCORRECTED NOX -
M-60
-------
APPENDIX M,CONT'D
LISTING OF TWO SPEED IDLE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
NO. YR MAKE
828 73 FORD
829 73 FORD
830 73 LINC
831 73 MERC
832 73 MERC
833 73 MERC
831 73 OLDS
835 73 OLDS
836 73 OLDS
MODL MODE
TORI 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
GALA 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
CONT 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
COME 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
MONO 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
MONT 2250CN)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
CUTL 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
CUTL 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
CUTL 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
ACCEPT
HC CO
50
80
200
120
60
70
190
260
70
330
120
120
75
175
100
210
160
100
5.0
7.0
3-9
0.9
1.0
1.3
6.0
7.0
2.3
4.9
1.4
1.0
2.4
4.1
4.6
7.5
4.0
1.6
BEFORE MTCE
HC CO NOX
80 2.1
100 2.6
200 7.2
230 7.5
- -
- -
-
. _
150 6.1
145 6.6
250 6.5
240 7.0
- -
-
•• «•
_ ^
- -
: :
25 1.7
40 2.1
190 7.6
210 8.0
- -
- -
186
176
55
55
_
_
_
_
106
106
80
54
_
-
-
-
-
-
118
101
48
38
-
-
MECH REG
HC CO
225 1.2
200 5.2
_ _
_ _
- -
M mm
155 5.6
260 7-8
_ _
- _
_ _
^ ^
-
: :
50 1.0
260 9.4
-
-
MECH CK
HC CO
50
AFTER MTCE
HC CO NOX
60 1.0 200 1.8 186
- 190 2.8 176
40 0.9 170 1.3 66
- 150 1.4 60
140 6.1 100 5.4 121
- 130 7.0 103
80 0.6 90 0.8 78
90 1.3 70
1.7 70
- 110
90 1.5
80
110
4.3
5.2
2.
106
94
SPEED IDLE TEST RESULTS ARE: HC - PPM/HEXANE, CO - $, UNCORRECTED NOX - PPM
M-61
-------
APPENDIX M,CONT'D
LISTING OF TWO SPEED IDLE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
ACCEPT
NO. YR
837 73
838 73
839 73
840 73
841 73
842 73
843 73
844 73
845 73
MAKE MODL MODE
OLDS CUTL 2250 (N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
PLYM DUST 2250 (N)
• REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
PLYM DUST 2250 (N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
PLYM DUST 2250 (N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
PLYM SATA 2250 (N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
PLYM SATE 2250 (N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
PLYM FRY3 2250 (N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
PONT VENT 2250 (N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
PONT LEMA 2250 (N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
HC
40
-
600
-
160
-
250
-
330
340
-
200
-
420
-
70
-
85
-
250
380
-
120
230
-
150
-
300
180
-
405
-
CO
1.5
-
0.4
—
1.5
-
1.6
-
8.7
7.5
-
4.5
9.6
1.4
-
0.6
-
5.0
6.0
-
3.5
7.5
4.8
-
7.0
0.6
-
3.2
BEFORE MTCE
HC
150
200
130
170
M
-
—
-
105
85
200
190
250
250
380
410
—
-
—
-
260
300
250
100
160
160
210
240
40
170
70
355
320
360
620
760
CO
2.8
3.M
0.4
0.2
_
-
_
-
0.6
0.6
2.9
3.1
4.2
4.2
9.0
9.0
_
-
••
-
8.4
8.4
5.7
6.2
2.6
3.2
5.4
6.2
3.4
5.0
3.2
7.8
4.3
6.2
7.8
9.9
NOX
389
389
95
90
_
-
«.
-
767
639
7§
78
52
58
35
34
_
-
—
-
25
85
54
50
348
307
54
70
156
76
8
207
219
43
32
MECH
HC
100
-
150
-
_
-
«.
-
125
195
—
240
-
580
-
—
-
_
-
150
260
—
900
235
280
-
600
120
-
350
-
REC
CO
1.0
'-
0.3
—
_
-
_
-
0.3
2.0
—
4.2
-
9.8
—
M
-
_
-
1.8
5.2
-
4.2
5.1
-
5.5
2.8
2.5
—
5.2
-
MECH CK
HC
100
-
120
—
_
-
_
-
100
120
-
180
-
180
—
m
—
_
-
145
200
-
95
110
-
70
-
170
170
-
1600
-
CO
1.2
-
0.3
_
-
M
-
0.5
0.5
-
3.6
0.5
-
_
—
_
—
1.6
0.5
—
1.4
1.0
-
2.0
-
0.2
3.4
-
0.3
-
AFTER MTPR
HC
130
150
90
100
_
-
_
-
80
150
100
120
150
160
175
190
_
—
_
—
375
360
195
145
60
90
120
130
95
1bO
215
190
180
270
2000
2000
CO
2.8
3.0
0.6
0.6
^
-
—
-
0.8
1.2
0.5
0.7
?'°
4.2
0.6
0.6
-
••
-
••
8.2
9.0
1-i
In
.0
1.1
1.4
1.5
1.6
3.2
c Jl
?•"
1.5
2.4
3.4
0 1
d. I
O.J
n U
u.^
• «• vu
NOX
225
196
66
58
_
-
—
-
532
511
95
90
128
317
g
56
-
— '
-
"*
106
101
62
70
0
470
3118
62
c;8
3°
86
70
iu
55
52
20«
116
161
146
TWO SPEED IDLE TEST RESULTS ARE: HC - PPM/HEXANE, CO - %, UNCORRECTED NOX -
M-62
-------
APPENDIX M,CONT'D
LISTING OF TWO SPEED IDLE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
ACCEPT
NO. YR MAKE MODL MODE HC CO
DENVER
BEFORE MTCE
HC CO NOX
MECH REC MECH CK AFTER MTCE
HC CO HC CO HC CO NOX
846 73 PONT LEMA 2250CN) 1300 1.7
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N) 700 9.5
REPLICATE -
847 73 PONT CATA 2250(N) 115 0.8
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N) 250 2.6
REPLICATE -
848 73 PONT CATA 2250(N) 35 1.2
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N) 145 3-2
REPLICATE -
849 73 PONT STAW 2250(N) 35 0.4
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N) 320 6.3
REPLICATE -
850 73 DATS B610 2250(N) 260 4.0
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N) 940 9.2
REPLICATE -
851 73 DATS 240Z 2250(N) 40 4.4
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N) 360 8.4
REPLICATE -
852 73 HOND CIVI 2250(N) 220 6.4
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N) 430 8.2
REPLICATE -
853 73 MAZD RX2 2250(N) 80 3-5
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N) 40 1.8
REPLICATE -
^ 73 MAZD RX2 2250(N) 80 0.2
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N) 20 0.1
REPLICATE -
410 1.1 116 80 2.0 100 3-0 320 2.0 146
350 1.9 204 - - - - 300 3.8 186
370 4.3 21 470 9-6 175 0.6 420 0.4 131
620 5.8 12 - - - - 360 0.8 90
30
60
220
230
150
170
800
800
40
40
100
80
140
180
225
270
0.4
0.9
6.0
6.0
3.4
3.1
8.8
8.8
0.5
0.6
2.6
2.9
2.8
3-5
4.2
4.2
95
95
40
42
86
80
17
17
136
149
38
40
133
133
80
78
50
300
180
820
75
85
200
310
0.3
7.2
2.3
9.0
0.3
3-2
3-2
4.0
40
200
150
320
60
170
175
350
0.3
1.3
2.1
1.5
0.2
2.7
2.8
1.5
35
65
80
100
80
130
260
280
8
120
90
175
125
320
450
1.1
4.1
2.3
3.7
2.4
3.0
2.4
2.8
0.4
0.5
2.6
3.0
3-6
3.2
2.5
1.0
96
73
55
53
106
86
42
85
118
95
32
40
101
113
63
68
™ SPEED IDLE TEST RESULTS ARE: HC - PPM/HEXANE, CO - %, UNCORRECTED NOX - PPM
M-63
-------
APPENDIX M,CONT'D
LISTING OF TWO SPEED IDLE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
NO.
855
856
857
ACCEPT
YR MAKE MODL MODE HC CO
73 MG CONV 2250(N) 150
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N) 1600
REPLICATE -
73 PORS 914 2250(N) 500
. REPLICATE -
IDLE(N) 410
REPLICATE -
73 TOYO STAW 2250(N) 300
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N) 1000
REPLICATE -
3.0
1.6
0.3
2.9
7.2
10.0
BEFORE MTCE
HC CO NOX
15
75
790
1250
100
150
430
460
260
1000
1200
1300
1.1
1.4
1.9
2.0
0.6
0.7
3.0
3-2
6.0
5.8
10.0
10.0
Z§
11
116
113
55
50
101
176
12
18
MECH REC
HC CO
35
1300
500
470
420
1550
1.3
0.9
0.3
3.8
5.2
10.0
MECH
HC
110
420
60
200
250
300
CK
CO
1.0
2.5
1.1
5.6
5.0
1.0
AFTER MICE
HC CO NOX
30
110
660
960
100
170
720
620
138
155
220
235
1.3 63
1.5 66
3.4 30
3.6 30
2.3 106
2.0 95
5.6 46
6.2 40
4.3 116
4.5 108
1.4 68
1.1 81
858 73 TOYO CORO 2250(N) 170 1.1
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N) 350 1.5
REPLICATE -
859 73 TOYO STAW 2250(N) 235 5.4
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N) 315 2.9
REPLICATE -
860 73 SUBA STAW 2250(N) 360 5.0
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N) 470 9.1
REPLICATE -
861 73 VOLK SEDA 2250(N) 60 1.3
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N) 70 1.4
REPLICATE -
862 73 VOLK SEDA 2250(N) 150 1.6
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N) 160 2.5
REPLICATE -
863 73 VOLK SEDA 2250(N) 500 3.4
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N) 900 3.7
REPLICATE -
100
140
360
400
4.
3.
8.
8.
2
6
4
4
95
95
34
32
90
260
1.8
4.8
110
220
2.6
-
1.5
100
120
270
270
3
3
I
.8
.5
.1
.0
106
f\f
96
vjivn
-Crvo
270 3-6
290 3-6
1220 4.3
620 4.8
75
79
43
51
520 4.4
1400 4.6
210 3-4
0.6 1«
™ 3:° iggg Si 8
TWO SPEED IDLE TEST RESULTS ARE: HC - PPM/HEXANE, CO - %, UNCORRECTED NOX -
tt-64
-------
APPENDIX M,CONT'D
LISTING OF TWO SPEED IDLE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
ACCEPT
NO. YR MAKE MODL MODE HC CO
864 73 VOLV 142S 2250(N) 600
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N) 850
REPLICATE -
076 72 AMMO GREM 2250(N)
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE -
077 72 BUIC RIVI 2250(N) -
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE -
078 72 CADI DEVI 2250(N) -
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE -
079 72 CHEV VEGA 2250(N) -
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE -
080 72 CHEV MALI 2250(N) -
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE -
081 72 CHEV CHEL 2250(N) -
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE -
082 72 CHEV NOVA 2250(N) -
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE -
°83 72 CHEV IMPA 2250(N) -
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE -
8.9
8.4
_
_
_
_
_
-
-
-
w
—
-
—
-
:
—
-
BEFORE MTCE
HC CO NOX
345
500
600
940
2000
2000
2000
2000
20
20
120
135
45
35
165
170
?i
60
70
135
140
340
430
11
110
120
55
135
740
760
120
160
290
390
7.2
7.0
7.0
6.8
3.6
3.4
8.0
8.4
0.5
0.6
4.5
4.6
1.8
1.8
4.6
4.4
0.5
0.6
1.0
1.1
4-Z
4.6
7.6
9.0
2.0
3.1
0.6
0.7
1.4
1.4
10.0
10.0
5.0
4.8
5-!i
7.8
101
94
42
42
450
440
47
45
151
154
11
106
94
31
31
^9
38
24
22
128
121
56
38
161
103
43
47
181
171
15
10
116
101
11
MECH REG
HC CO
950
2000
2000
2000
60
250
50
150
190
350
100
200
60
200
100
660
30
60
10.0
10.0
2.6
7.0
0.2
6.0
1.8
4.6
3.2
6.2
3.0
4.0
0.4
1.3
0.8
9.2
0.3
0.6
MECH CK
HC CO
250
700
130
140
60
70
30
70
70
100
60
140
40
150
70
120
15
20
5.8
2.5
1.8
1.0
0.3
1.0
0.9
2.8
0.3
0.5
1.5
2.0
0.4
1.4
0.6
0.7
0.3
0.3
AFTER MTCE
HC CO NOX
180
225
400
400
130
120
155
145
15
20
40
40
35
30
130
130
25
80
130
85
60
80
125
150
85
65
175
125
40
60
130
130
80
105
180
230
5.6
6.0
3.5
3.5
2.6
2.6
2.4
2.4
0.4
0.4
0.6
0.6
3.3
2.8
3-2
3.0
°d
1:8
3.6
4.4
3.9
4.5
2.0
2.5
1.0
1.1
0.8
1.0
0.9
0.8
1.1
4.0
1.0
6.0
92
80
46
42
348
450
92
106
212
266
53
57
65
66
30
32
85
73
31
36
111
116
58
103
95
39
40
126
133
70
49
164
176
83
83
spEED IDLE TEST RESULTS ARE: HC - PPM/HEXANE, CO - %, UNCORRECTED NOX - PPM
M-65
-------
APPENDIX M,CONT'D
LISTING OF TWO SPEED IDLE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
ACCEPT BEFORE MTCE
NO.
084
085
086
087
088
089
090
091
092
YR MAKE MODL MODE
72 CHEV BELA 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
72 DODG CORO 2250(N)
• REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
72 FORD PINT 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
72 FORD GRNT 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
72 FORD MAVE 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
72 FORD GALA 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
72 FORD STAW 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
72 MERC MONG 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
72 OLDS CUTL 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
HC CO HC
- 210
- 330
- 1150
- 1160
- 85
- 100
- 190
- 210
- 2000
- 2000
- 820
- 1040
- 45
55
- 150
- 130
- 180
- 175
- 220
- 250
- 740
- 700
- 160
- 175
- 460
- 400
- 240
- 240
- 650
- 425
- 175
- 260
90
- 100
- 220
- - 345
CO
1.2
1.6
6.0
6.2
0.6
1.1
1.5
1.7
3.5
3.2
8.4
8.9
0.8
0.9
3.8
4.1
3.2
3.1
3.1
4.3
1.1
0.9
§:«
0.9
1.7
4-3
4.8
0.8
1.1
1.0
0.6
4.6
5.3
8.2
8.8
NOX
266
217
49
51
470
235
72
75
511
941
41
48
247
219
TQ
70
Q
266
222
83
64
655
675
111
103
491
542
55
60
348
77
67
131
123
36
29
MECH
HC
120
-
900
—
60
-
200
-
1700
-
460
-
25
-
140
—
180
-
270
-
130
600
250
-
240
-
300
225
200
—
300
-
REC
CO
2.0
-
6.0
—
0.1
-
0.2
-
1.8
-
6.8
-
0.3
3.8
2.7
3.5
2.5
-
0.6
0.3
5.0
0.3
0.2
5.6
7.6
MECH CK
HC
30
90
50
-
60
-
60
-
95
30
90
100
-
150
80
-
350
70
60
-
30
35
70
340
-
CO
0.7
1.3
0.1
-
0.6
-
0.9
-
1.0
-
0.3
0.7
-
1.3
1.2
-
0.5
-
0.1
0.3
0.4
-
0.2
0.1
1.6
-
1.2
-
AFTER MTCR
HC
30
45
100
120
65
130
150
160
95
115
125
130
30
40
105
110
125
215
180
220
30
30
180
90
90
60
50
50
50
70
20
50
40
50
60
> f— •
65
CO
0.8
1.6
1.4
0.9
0.9
2.2
4.7
4.9
3.1
3-3
2.6
2.7
0.6
0.8
1.4
1.4
1.8
4.4
1.6
3-1
0.6
0.6
0.4
0.3
H
1.6
0.5
I*
.1
0.3
1.5
0.2
0.8
2.1
3 li
*
1.1
1 1
l.i
NOX
227
*»*~ i
176
80
63
378
m
63
55
276
276
57
59
307
266
106
101
296
181
80
75
202
A Qrt
189
I
430
430
91
on
yu
511
430
141
136
118
62
65
TWO SPEED IDLE TEST RESULTS ARE: HC - PPM/HEXANE, CO - %, UNCORRECTED NOX - PPM
M-66
-------
APPENDIX M,CONT'D
LISTING OF TWO SPEED IDLE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
NO. YR MAKE
093 72 PLYM
094 72 PLYM
095 72 PONT
096 72 PONT
097 72 DATS
098 72 TOYO
099 72 VOLK
1°0 72 VOLK
ACCEPT BEFORE MTCE
MODL MODE HC CO HC CO NOX
VALI 2250(N) -
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE -
FURY 2250(N) -
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE -
CATA 2250(N)
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE -
LEMA 2250(N)
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE -
510 2250(N) -
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE -
CORO 2250CN) -
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE -
KARM 2250(N) -
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE -
KOMB 2250(N) -
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE -
- 270
- 210
- 920
- 820
- 135
- 135
- 250
- 235
40
50
- 640
- 600
55
65
- 190
- 210
- 130
- 140
- 490
- 480
- 110
- 120
- 200
- 220
- 85
90
- 270
- 230
75
60
- 1400
- 550
5.9
4.7
10.0
10.0
2Q
• y
2Q
. o
§•9
8.9
1.3
1.5
4.0
4.4
1.4
2.0
3.5
4.2
2.3
2.7
U
3:?
°'?
0.4
1.3
1.9
3.3
3-2
0.8
1.0
?:?
337
470
11
11
266
255
?8
40
186
176
64
72
217
207
73
70
164
191
54
71
209
146
57
65
128
59
60
25
146
149
81
78
MECH REG
HC CO
600
1400
160
180
40
250
140
290
150
350
165
385
130
220
240
1400
7.0
10.0
3-0
6.0
1.1
5.0
3.0
7.0
1.9
5.2
3.2
0.3
1.1
2.5
0.6
5.4
MECH CK
HC CO
130
145
100
80
80
270
30
190
70
170
160
230
135
150
640
160
1.2
1.4
0.6
0.5
0.8
0.6
1.3
0.8
2.2
3.5
2.8
2.4
1.4
3-0
0.2
0.4
AFTER MTCE
HC CO NOX
135
135
700
320
105
120
90
75
40
40
520
520
100
80
210
170
110
70
390
400
140
135
240
235
80
65
350
330
1750
1370
1750
700
0.6
1.5
0.3
0.8
0.3
0.3
0.4
0.6
1.1
1.3
1-3
1.8
4.4
3-4
0.2
0.2
2.2
2.2
3.6
3.4
3Q
• "7
3ft
.0
2-?
2.4
1.0
1.5
2.6
2.6
0.3
0.3
0.6
0.8
276
232
48
51
348
399
61
70
307
214
126
202
138
159
48
52
196
199
72
75
171
1$6
32
36
95
98
50
56
54
40
48
38
72 BUIC SKYL 2250(N) 120 1.2 -
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N) 330 3.7 -
REPLICATE -
0 spEED IDLE TEST RESULTS ARE: HC - PPM/HEXANE, CO - %, UNCORRECTED NOX - PPM
M-67
-------
APPENDIX M,CONT'D
LISTING OF TWO SPEED IDLE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
NO.
395
396
398
400
401
402
403
404
405
YR MAKE MODL MODE
72 CHEV CHEL 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
72 CHEV KING 2250(N)
• REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
72 CHRY NEWP 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
72 DODG DART 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
72 FORD PINT 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
72 FORD MAVE 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
72 FORD GALA 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
72 FORD LTD 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
72 LING CONT 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
ACCEPT
HC CO
30
200
160
280
300
380
420
350
830
1000
245
280
140
290
1900
490
70
190
0.6
4.6
3-8
7.6
2.6
7.8
6.0
8.4
7.9
6.3
2.0
4.5
3.0
4.2
2.2
8.5
0.3
4.9
BEFORE MTCE
HC CO NOX
-
_
2°
85
220
230
165
240
180
210
270
260
390
400
450
430
860
760
-
_
-
-
490
345
430
690
_
-
—
_
2.0
2.2
6.6
7.2
1.7
2.2
3.2
3.2
4.7
4.4
8.2
8.0
4.7
4.4
3.8
3-2
-
_
_
-
1:1
9.4
10.0
-
-
-
_
52
54
40
36
389
368
53
53
149
138
34
35
164
186
56
66
_
_
-
:
430
296
27
21
-
-
MECH REC
HC CO
- -
- -
90 0.1
325 7.2
300 1.3
200 2.5
145 3.1
420 10.0
650 3-2
950 2.5
_ _
_ _
- -
: :
150 0.8
400 6.3
-
- -
MECH
HC
—
_
110
150
150
170
75
150
750
1080
_
-
_
-
70
95
_
-
CK
CO
-
_
2.0
0.3
0.5
0.5
1.6
0.5
3-6
1.2
-
-
-
-
0.6
0.3
-
—
AFTER MTCE
HC CO NOX
_
_
115
105
110
110
110
150
130
200
170
320
&>
390
520
1020
1100
—
-
-
-
50
100
60
85
—
-
—
—
3.8
3.3
0.9
0.8
0.9
1.7
0.3
0.3
3-5
3-7
1.8
0.6
3.6
4.3
4.2
5.8
-
-
-
-
1.7
1.5
0.8
0.7
-
«•
:
:
ii
8
511
389
S
166
116
62
62
389
286
49
52
-
—
—
—
419
450
67
62
-
-
TWO SPEED IDLE TEST RESULTS ARE: HC - PPM/HEXANE, CO - %, UNCORRECTED NOX -
M-68
-------
APPENDIX M,CONT'D
LISTING OF TWO SPEED IDLE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
ACCEPT BEFORE MTCE MECH REC MECH CK AFTER MTCE
NO. YR MAKE MODL MODE HC CO HC CO NOX HC CO HC CO HC CO NOX
406 72 MERC MONT 2250(N) 80 3.2 ----------
REPLICATE ------------
IDLE(N) 200 4.5 ----------
REPLICATE ------------
409 72 OLDS NNTY 2250(N) 50 0.5 ----------
REPLICATE ------------
IDLE(N) 220 5.0 ----------
REPLICATE ------------
410 72 PLYM VALI 2250(N) 1600 1.81500 2.0 307 450 2.0 150 1.4 90 1.3 247
REPLICATE - - 1200 3-2 131 - 130 1.5 255
IDLE(N) 350 5.8 430 7-3 46 590 10.0 170 0.5 380 0.4 52
REPLICATE - - 600 9.8 34 - - - - 310 0.3 56
411 72 PONT GRNV 2250(N) 50 1.5 -
REPLICATE ------------
IDLE(N) 240 2.4 ----------
REPLICATE ------------
865 72 AMMO GREM 2250(N) 1200 4.21400 3-0 348 100 1.0 340 0.7 330 3-6 307
REPLICATE - - 1200 4.2 266 - 195 3.6 307
IDLE(N) 800 3-5 1500 2.0 85 1300 2.5 220 1.1 270 4.8 59
REPLICATE - - 900 3.6 64 - - - - 235 4.4 61
866 72 AMMO HORN 2250(N) 170 2.1 -
REPLICATE ------------
IDLE(N) 180 1.7-
REPLICATE ------------
867 72 BUIC SKYL 2250(N) 40 2.2 ----------
REPLICATE ------------
IDLE(N) 200 1.0 ----------
REPLICATE ------------
868 72 BUIC LASA 2250(N) 90 2.0 ----------
REPLICATE ------------
IDLE(N) 100 0.4 ----------
REPLICATE ------------
869 72 BUIC LASA 2250(N) 100 5.0 - -
REPLICATE ------------
IDLE(N) 150 5.0 -----
REPLICATE ------------
^0 SPEED IDLE TEST RESULTS ARE: HC - PPM/HEXANE, CO - %, UNCORRECTED NOX - PPM
M-69
-------
APPENDIX M,CONT'D
LISTING OF TWO SPEED IDLE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
ACCEPT BEFORE MTCE MECH REC MECH CK AFTER WTCE
NO. YR MAKE MODL MODE HC CO HC CO NOX HC CO HC CO HC CO NOX
870 72 BUIC
871 72 CADI
872 72 CADI
873 72 CHEV
LASA 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
DEVI 2250(N)
• REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
DEVI 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
VEGA 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
60
140
40
30
40
115
80
80
0.4 -
2.3 -
0.4 -
0.6 -
0.4 -
3.6 - - - -
2.1 -
1.0 -
------
— — — — — —
______
_
------
_ — _ _ _ _
_
------
874 72 CHEV VEGA 2250(N) 170 4.0 80 4.2 128 50 1.5 20 0.2 70 2.5 17
REPLICATE - - 110 5.8 103 - - - - 130 4.0 20
IDLE(N) 220 6.2 210 7.4 72 160 3-7 70 1.3 170 2.5 15
REPLICATE - - 330 9.0 59 - - - - 235 4.8 20
875 72 CHEV VEGA 2250(N) 30 0.4- - - - - - - - - -
REPLICATE ------------
IDLE(N) 80 1.5- - - - - - - - - '
REPLICATE ------------
876 72 CHEV VEGA 2250(N) 40 0.3 - - - - - - - -
REPLICATE ------------
IDLE(N) 80 1.6- - - - - - - ---
REPLICATE ------------
877 72 CHEV NOVA 2250(N) 130 1.3 110 2.0 266 75 0.8 80 0.6 120 3-J ]2
REPLICATE - - 230 3-0 247 - 180 4.9 w
IDLE(N) 400 5.7 400 6.0 58 360 .5.6 170 0.6 250 4.3 jjj
REPLICATE - - 480 7.6 45 - - - - 220 4.4 •»
878 72 CHEV NOVA 2250(N) 300 2.5 - - - - - - - - - I
REPLICATE -----------
IDLE(N) 200 3.5 - - - - - - - " I
REPLICATE -----------
TWO SPEED IDLE TEST RESULTS ARE: HC - PPM/HEXANE, CO - %, UNCORRECTED NOX -
M-70
-------
APPENDIX M.CONT'D
LISTING OF TWO SPEED IDLE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
NO. YR MAKE MODL MODE
879 72 CHEV CAMA 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
880 72 CHEV NOVA 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
881 72 CHEV NOVA 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
882 72 CHEV MALI 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
883 72 CHEV MALI 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
881 72 CHEV MALI 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
885 72 CHEV CHEL 2250 (N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
886 72 CHEV MONT 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
887 72 CHEV NOVA 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
ACCEPT
HC CO
150
340
50
150
110
225
130
320
210
1000
100
250
60
360
190
310
180
340
0.4
2.5
0.2
2.8
2.8
5.2
0.8
2.1
4.5
10.0
1.0
2.8
0.2
8.4
1.9
6.3
3.8
8.2
BEFORE MTCE
HC CO NOX
-
_
110
210
800
790
-
-
30
100
340
520
60
130
360
460
105
90
355
400
-
-
4.0
4.4
10.0
10.0
_
^
0.6
4.6
8.5
10.0
2.8
4.8
10.0
10.0
3.2
2.1
8.6
9-6
-
_
28
21
18
13
-
-
154
121
34
29
151
111
28
126
151
39
MECH REC
HC CO
-
-
150
500
-
—
40
360
60
290
100
330
-
_
3.0
9.0
-
-
0.3
8.2
2.0
7.5
2.0
6.6
MECH CK
HC CO
-
_
100
300
_
-
40
200
50
100
90
150
-
_
2.5
1.0
_
_
0.4
1.3
1.3
0.2
1.4
0.7
AFTER MTCE
HC CO NOX
-
-
75
100
200
170
-
-
50
30
125
135
70
94
130
150
110
160
175
265
-
_
3.0
3.0
0.6
1.0
-
-
2.8
1.0
3.4
3.9
2.2
2.5
1.2
1.7
3.6
5.0
4.2
6.8
-
_
138
121
60
64
-
-
131
133
56
60
108
76
48
42
146
111
66
55
SPEED IDLE TEST RESULTS ARE: HC - PPM/HEXANE, CO - %, UNCORRECTED NOX - PPM
M-71
-------
APPENDIX M,CONT'D
LISTING OF TWO SPEED IDLE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
NO.
888
889
890
891
892
893
894
895
896
YR MAKE MODL MODE
72 CHEV IMPA 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
72 CHEV MONT 2250(N)
• REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
72 CHEV NOVA 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
72 CHEV MONT 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
72 CHEV IMPA 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
72 CHEV CHEL 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
72 CHRY NEWP 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
72 DODG DART 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
72 DODG DART 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
ACCEPT
HC CO
40
200
240
420
825
1750
130
1300
30
70
250
60
150
290
300
370
300
200
0.7
4.2
5.0
7.0
0.3
0.8
0.8
6.0
0.7
2.0
0.5
2.1
2.3
6.6
5.5
8.0
5.5
2.3
BEFORE MTCE
HC CO NOX
-
-
30
50
200
230
800
920
1680
1800
15
90
905
1000
-
-
-
-
95
170
210
250
160
240
300
310
-
-
-
_
0.4
0.4
5i6
0.5
1.0
1.2
1.8
0.4
0.4
Z-6
8.0
-
-
_
-
2.5
3.8
5.0
5.6
2.9
4.0
7.4
7.2
_
-
-
_
227
191
56
49
191
141
40
33
101
90
16
16
-
-
_
-
358
255
43
43
227
286
37
65
-
-
MECH
HC
-
_
45
220
850
1025
50
900
-
_
_
^
150
350
180
290
-
-
REC MECH
CO HC
-
_ _
0.4 50
5.3 75
0.4 1025
0.3 1250
2.2 50
6.3 700
_ _
_ _
_ _
^ m m
3.0 175
6.0 225
2.5 180
6.0 130
_ _
- -
CK
CO
-
_
1.7
0.4
3.5
4.8
0.2
1.2
-
_
-
—
4.0
3.2
1.2
0.5
-
-
AFTER WTCE
HC CO NOX
_
M
45
95
90
110
600
640
810
1020
20
30
400
600
-
-
-
-
110
130
290
95
180
260
120
120
-
—
^
— _
1.2 146
3.0 128
0.4 60
0.3 56
1.8 133
1.8 136
5.5 45
1.6 41
0.3 126
0.3 116
1.4 36
1.7 35
-
-
-
_ -
3i9 266
J:8 S
1:- $
fct 8
~
—
TWO SPEED IDLE TEST RESULTS ARE: HC - PPM/HEXANE, CO - %, UNCORRECTED NOX -
M-72
-------
APPENDIX M,CONT'D
LISTING OF TWO SPEED IDLE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
NO. YR
897 72
898 72
899 72
900 72
901 72
902 72
903 72
901 72
90572
ACCEPT
MAKE MODL MODE HC CO
DODG DART 2250(N) 250 4.0
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N) 500 10.0
REPLICATE -
DODG POLA 2250(N) 390 5.8
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N) 800 10.0
REPLICATE -
FORD PINT 2250CN) 420 3.8
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N) 310 6.8
REPLICATE -
FORD PINT 2250(N) 1000 0.6
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N) 1800 0.9
REPLICATE -
FORD PINT 2250(N) 200 3.0
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N) 500 10.0
REPLICATE -
FORD MAVE 2250(N) 160 8.8
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N) 800 0.7
REPLICATE -
FORD MUST 2250(N) 220 0.3
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N) 700 0.4
REPLICATE -
FORD MAVE 2250(N) 1875 2.2
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N) 2000 0.2
REPLICATE -
FORD MAVE 2250(N) 120 1.5
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N) 240 2.5
REPLICATE -
BEFORE MTCE
HC CO NOX
80
110
290
275
180
300
1440
1770
260
315
290
330
700
600
1680
1480
150
150
660
440
100
120
120
70
170
110
455
800
1950
1950
2000
2000
-
-
1.4
1.4
6.0
5.6
4.6
4.4
10.0
10.0
3.0
3.2
6.8
7.0
0.9
1.1
1.7
1.5
2.1
2.5
10.0
8.6
7-5
7.8
1.3
1.0
0.9
0.8
1.5
0.6
1.3
3-2
0.6
0.5
—
-
245
232
24
24
146
151
12
11
245
247
64
60
156
232
$
121
116
30
46
7X
38
84
46
ill
41
47
38
181
1
-
-
MECH REC
HC CO
145
450
270
1100
305
310
475
1300
120
350
120
200
145
650
700
2000
-
-
1.7
10.0
4.8
10.0
2.0
6.6
0.4
1.0
1.9
8.5
7.0
0.8
1.2
0.6
1.8
0.8
M
-
MECH CK
HC CO
80
110
80
120
250
150
180
300
200
400
55
50
90
350
100
270
-
-
0.3
0.5
0.9
1.6
1.6
0.8
1.0
1.7
0.8
3-2
3-0
0.6
0.7
0.4
0.8
1.4
-
-
AFTER MTCE
HC CO NOX
$
50
50
40
70
120
100
227
245
200
200
255
210
400
350
120
110
370
540
S5
80
60
90
30
30
290
310
140
200
70
300
_
-
°'?
0.4
0.5
0.7
0.4
0.4
0.6
0.8
2.0
2.0
1.3
2.0
1.0
1.2
2.2
2.7
0.9
0.9
5.0
6.1
2.9
3-5
0.9
1.5
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.6
1.9
2.3
2.2
3.0
—
:
307
191
74
50
234
227
57
62
368
286
11
196
166
26
86
146
106
I5
18
30
29
31
247
239
51
53
204
141
SO
44
-
:
SPEED IDLE TEST RESULTS ARE: HC - PPM/HEXANE, CO - %, UNCORRECTED NOX - PPM
M-73
-------
APPENDIX M,CONT'D
LISTING OF TWO SPEED IDLE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
NO.
906
907
908
909
910
911
912
913
914
ACCEPT
YR MAKE MODL MODE HC CO
72 FORD MAVE 2250(N) 500
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N) 1190
REPLICATE -
72 FORD GALA 2250(N) 2000
• REPLICATE -
IDLE(N) 2000
REPLICATE -
72 FORD STAW 2250(N) 70
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N) 200
REPLICATE -
72 FORD LTD 2250(N) 120
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N) 1350
REPLICATE -
72 FORD LTD 2250(N) 1850
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N) 180
REPLICATE -
72 FORD GALA 2250(N) 80
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N) 290
REPLICATE -
72 MERC COME 2250(N) 800
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N) 525
REPLICATE -
72 MERC MONT 2250(N) 80
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N) 110
REPLICATE -
72 OLDS CUTL 2250(N) 160
REPLICATE -
IDLE(N) 180
REPLICATE -
6.0
10.0
2.6
1.1
0.7
3.8
0.6
0.3
0.6
1.5
0.3
5.7
5.5
4.5
2.2
3.6
2.4
1.1
BEFORE MTCE
HC CO NOX
270
390
1000
990
270
580
350
290
-
-
310
270
420
140
_
«•
30
40
300
360
1180
920
320
320
-
-
_
-
4.8
5.2
10.0
10.0
2.1
4.8
7.5
4.9
-
-
1.9
2.2
1.9
1.7
_
-
1.0
1.7
6.8
8.0
4.0
4.6
5.4
5.9
*»
«*
-
-
399
276
24
22
222
149
3!
_
_
430
72
72
32
—
«w
222
219
45
44
18
146
63
72
^
,„
-
-
MECH REC
HC CO
310
1100
700
220
_
_
1300
2000
-
—
40
325
1900
210
-
-
-
-
1.8
10.0
0.6
4.0
-
_
0.4
0.5
—
•
0.4
6.5
2.7
3.5
—
«*
-
-
MECH
HC
300
150
140
180
-
-
90
45
-
-
135
230
190
120
_
_
_
-
CK
CO
4.0
0.8
0.8
3.0
-
-
0.6
0.6
_
_
0.3
1.7
2.1
1.5
-
_
-
:
AFTER MICE
HC CO NOX
240
300
120
170
130
130
110
110
_
-
80
90
60
70
-
-
120
135
155
150
200
290
150
200
-
-
-
—
3-8 573
4.8 450
1.1 79
3-0 72
2.0 327
3.2 214
2.3 83
2.2 75
—. —
- -
0.9 235
1.6 286
0.6 77
1.5 72
-
_ -
0.6 W
0.6 409
2.2 63
2.3 W
3.6 317
4.8 239
2.1 86
2.3 79
-
-
-
-
TWO SPEED IDLE TEST RESULTS ARE: HC - PPM/HEXANE, CO - %, UNCORRECTED NOX -
M-74
-------
APPENDIX M,CONT'D
LISTING OF TWO SPEED IDLE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
ACCEPT BEFORE MTCE MECH REC MECH CK AFTER MTCE
NO. YR MAKE MODL MODE HC CO HC CO NOX HC CO HC CO HC CO NOX
9?5~72~OLDS CUTL 2250(N~ 110 3.8 - "- -"" -~ - ~--- -~
REPLICATE ------------
IDLE(N) 150 3.6 ----------
REPLICATE ------------
916 72 OLDS DELT 2250(N) 140 1.2--- -------
REPLICATE ------------
IDLE(N) 360 4.5 ----------
REPLICATE ------------
917 72 OLDS CUTL 2250(N) 130 5.0 ----------
REPLICATE ------------
IDLE(N) 160 2.4 ----------
REPLICATE ------------
918 72 OLDS DELT 2250(N) 10 0.1 -
REPLICATE ------------
IDLE(N) 60 0.4 ----------
REPLICATE ------------
919 72 PLYM VALI 2250(N) 240 3-0 120 1.5 296 160 1.7 70 0.2 80 0.9 327
REPLICATE - - 160 2.0 245 - - - - 110 1.1 307
IDLE(N) 400 8.6 315 7.7 50 350 8.2 90 0.5 105 0.6 76
REPLICATE - - 325 6.0 40 - - - - 110 0.8 76
920 72 PLYM DUST 2250(N) 100 0.6 ----------
REPLICATE ------------
IDLE(N) 130 2.8 ----------
REPLICATE ------------
921 72 PLYM SATE 2250(N) 220 2.3 -
REPLICATE ------------
IDLE(N) 285 2.5 ----------
REPLICATE ------------
922 72 PLYM SCAM 2250(N) 70 0.5 ----------
REPLICATE ------------
IDLE(N) 90 0.6 ----------
REPLICATE ------------
923 72 PONT VENT 2250(N) 70 0.8 ----------
REPLICATE ------------
IDLE(N) 280 3.1----------
REPLICATE ------------
^0 SPEED IDLE TEST RESULTS ARE: HC - PPM/HEXANE, CO - %, UNCORRECTED NOX - PPM
M-75
-------
APPENDIX M,CONT'D
LISTING OF TWO SPEED IDLE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
NO. YR
924 72
925 72
926 72
927 72
928 72
929 72
930 72
931 72
932 72
MAKE MODL MODE
PONT STAW 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
PONT LEMA 2250CN)
• REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
PONT LEMA 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
PONT CATA 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
CAPR COUP 2250CN)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
DATS B110 2250CN)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
DATS 510 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
OPEL 1900 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
TOYO CORO 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
ACCEPT
HC CO
90
250
-
80
-
260
-
120
—
200
-
60
-
205
-
150
-
200
-
270
-
600
200
750
100
-
230
-
175
-
720
2.0
5.0
-
1.8
-
6.0
-
4.0
—
5.0
-
0.8
-
3.2
-
1.0
-
1.8
-
4.2
-
6.8
2.8
9.5
0.6
-
5.8
-
3.8
-
8.0
BEFORE MTCE
HC CO NOX
-
-
70
110
400
440
_
—
_
-
_
—
_
-
_
-
«.
-
180
235
380
430
200
145
560
680
110
100
200
200
120
135
360
360
-
-
1.9
2.8
7.8
7.9
_
—
_
-
_
—
_
—
_
-
_
-
3 6
4\2
5.2
5.2
1.8
2.3
6.4
6.9
0.9
0.7
3.2
3.4
2.6
3.2
9.4
9.4
-
-
199
181
53
48
_
—
..
-
_
—
_
—
_
-
_
-
46
53
33
31
161
154
11
286
307
70
72
141
131
40
38
MECH REC
HC CO
- -
- -
100 1.5
— -
380 9.0
- -
_ _
— —
_ _
- -
_ _
- -
_ _
- -
_ _
- -
— .
- -
200 2.0
-
410 3.2
155 1.3
630 5.8
175 1.6
- -
200 4.6
- -
220 2.1
- -
960 10.0
MECH CK
HC CO
- -
- -
40 0.8
- —
120 0.5
- -
_ _
— —
_ —
- -
_ _
— —
_ _
— —
_ _
- -
. _
- -
180 1.9
- -
400 0.2
300 2.0
600 2.0
140 1.0
-
180 1.0
- -
210 2.4
- -
530 2.3
AFTER KTCE
HC CO NOX
;
-
80
80
130
155
_
—
_
-
«
—
_
—
_
—
_
—
120
180
200
210
130
200
310
320
35
60
175
210
160
170
360
380
™
-
4.3
3.2
0.8
0.9
_
-
—
-
_
—
_
—
—
—
-
.*
2.8
4.2
0.8
0.8
2.5
2.5
1.7
2.1
0.2
0*5
.2
0.2
OO
.£
3.3
3."
1.7
3.3
—
-
156
146
71
62
_
-
_
-
_
-
-
~
-
—
-
—
22
10
32
31
26
286
229
t— CM
VOVO
202
iftQ
I Oj
68
62
ut-
116
94
7
45
44
TWO SPEED IDLE TEST RESULTS ARE: HC - PPM/HEXANE, CO - %, UNCORRECTED NOX -
M-76
-------
APPENDIX M,CONT'D
LISTING OF TWO SPEED IDLE TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
NO. YR
93372
934 72
935 72
93672
MAKE MODL MODE
TOYO STAW 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
VOLK SEDA 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
VOLK CONV 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
VOLK STAW 2250(N)
REPLICATE
IDLE(N)
REPLICATE
ACCEPT
HC CO
330
580
100
130
100
180
200
50
5.8
7.0
1.7
3.2
3.0
5.6
5.6
0.4
BEFORE MTCE MECH REC
HC CO NOX HC CO
220
260
395
510
-
-
120
125
300
310
-
-
4.7
5.0
7i8
-
_
4.7
4.8
8.8
9.0
_
-
111 300 5.2
95 -
46 540 8.6
38 - -
_
_
95 200 4.6
53 340 9.0
_ _ -
_
MECH CK
HC CO
100 5.0
420 2.0
- -
_ —
85 3-6
350 2.6
-
- -
AFTER MTCE
HC CO NOX
140
200
310
290
-
_
90
130
32°
480
-
-
4
2
4
4
4
10
10
:l
.6
.4
—
-
:l
.0
.0
-
:
m
217
98
—
_
116
106
41
42
-
:
SPEED IDLE TEST RESULTS ARE: HC - PPM/HEXANE, CO - %, UNCORRECTED NOX - PPM
M-77
-------
M-78
-------
APPENDIX N
-------
APPENDIX N
LISTING OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST EMISSION RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
Legend
VEH NO. - Vehicle Number
YEAR - Model Year
MAKE - Vehicle Make
MODL - Vehicle Model
CID - Engine Displacement in Cubic Inches
H.P. - Dynamometer Load used During Test, Applied
as Specified in Following Table
RIGHT EXHAUST
LEFT EXHAUST - These Headings Identify the Various Measurement Points
Depending on the Exhaust System of the Vehicle
RIGHT EXHAUST - From right engine exhaust before passing
through converter or with no converter
RT AFTER CONV - From right engine exhaust after passing
through converter
LEFT EXHAUST - From engine exhaust before converter or
with no converter
LFT AFTER CONV - From left engine exhaust after passing
through converter
T.P. COMPOSITE - Mixture of exhaust from both sides of
exhaust system
The diagrams on the following pages show the measurement points on various
exhaust systems. The following measurements were taken.
HC - Hydrocarbon Emissions in Parts per Million
Hexane (-: Not Applicable)
CO - Carbon Monoxide Emissions in Mole Per Cent
(-: Not Applicable)
NOx - Oxides of Nitrogen Emissions in Parts per
Million (-: Not Applicable)
02 - Oxygen Emissions in Per Cent (-: Not Applicable)
N-l
-------
Each test consists of measurements at four different conditions.
50 MPH - Vehicle Operating on Dynamometer at 50 Miles
Per Hour with Load Set as Specified
30 MPH - Vehicle Operating on Dynamometer at 30 Miles
Per Hour with Load Set as Specified
IDLE (D) - Vehicle at Normal Idle with Transmission in Drive
IDLE (N) - Vehicle at Normal Idle with Transmission in Neutral
Various tests that may be performed in the testing sequence are as
follows.
BEFORE MTCE -
The Initial Federal Three Mode Test Performed
Before Maintenance
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
- Repeat of Before Maintenance Test
- The Federal Three Mode Test Conducted After
Maintenance Was Performed on the Vehicle
REPLICATE - Repeat of After Maintenance Test
Vehicle
Weight
up to 2500
2501-3500
3501-4500
above 4500
High Speed (50 MPH)
Actual Load
21
26
31
36
Transmission
High
High
High
High
Low Speed (30 MPH)
Actual Load
9
12
15
18
Transmission
3rd
High
High
High
Idle Mode: Automatic Transmission in Neutral and Drive
: Manual Transmission in Neutral
N-2
-------
TT KlUHT AFTFR CONVFHTKRl L. NA
EXHAUST 3. TAILPIPK COMPOSITE |(Z\JUCHT ENGINE EXHAUST
NA
UCHT AFTER CONVERTER
LPIPE COMPOSITE
\
NA ?T LEFT AFTER CONVERTER
LEFT ENGINE EXHAUST 3. TAILPIPE COMPOSITE
1
(D NA
NA 7. LEFT AFTER CONVERTER
LEFT ENGINE EXHAUST 3. TAILPIPE COMPOSITK
NA
NA 2T RIGHT AFTBR CONVERTER
RIGHT ENGINE EXHAUST 3. TAILPIPE COMPOSITE
NA
NA ?". RIGHT AFTER CONVERTER
RIGHT ENGINE EXHAUST 3- TAILPIPE COMPOSITE
,. LEFT AFTER CONVERTER
LEFT ENGINE EXHAUST 3. TAILPIPE COMPOSITE
r
AFTER CONVERTER
TAILPIPE COMPOSITE
*L NA
NA (2} RIGHT AFTER CONVERTER
RIGHT ENGINE EXHAUST TJT TAILPIPE COMPOSITE
1. NA
. RIGHT AFTER CONVERTER
TAILPIPE COMPOSITE
,-_„ M. AFTER CONVERTER
LEFT ENGINE EXHAUST OVTAILPIPE COMPOSITE
LEFT AFTER CONVERTER
TAILPIPE COMPOSITE
RIGHT ENGINE EXHAUST
EFT ENGINE EXHAUST
NA C23 RIGHT AFTER CONVERTER
RIGHT ENGINE EXHAUST TT^TAILPIPE COMPOSITE
I
RIGHT AFTER CONVERTER
TAILPIPE COMPOSITE
Jtt NA
-------
O
1 . NA
'•A -i. H1GHT AFTER CONVEHTER
MOHT EMIINE EXHAUST m TAILPIPE COMPOSITE
\ I
NA
RIGHT AFTER CONVERTER
TAILPIPE COMPOSITE
r
^ CD NA
OJ) '.-A 2. LtFT AFTKR CONVERTER
l.r.rT L,v;iNK EXHAUST 3. TAILHIPt COMPOSITE
HICHT ENGINE EXHAUST
- -rh^<- +-
LEFT AFTER CONVEHTtR
TAILPIPE COHHOSITK
NA
PIGHT AFTER CONVF.RTER
TAILPIPE COMPOSITE
-IJHT ENGINE EXHAUST
\ i
1. NA
JL NA 2. RIGHT AFTER CONVERTER
(g) RIGHT ENGINE EXHAUST (Jj^AILPlPE COMPOSITE
1 . NA
AFTER CONVERTER
ENGINE EXHAUST nVTAILPIPE COMPOSITE ,
LEFT AFTER CONVERTER
'LEFT ENGINE EXHAUST T. TAILPIPE COMPOSITE
NA
,»A (Z> RIGHT AFTtR CONVERTER
PIGHT ENGINE EXHAUST 3. TAILPIPE COMPOSITE
1. NA
RIGHT AFTER CONVERTER
TAILPIPE COMPOSITE
RIGHT ENGINE EXHAUST
1. NA
KfT AFTER CONVERTER
-AlLPIPE COMPOSITE
CD LEFT AFTER CONVERTER
fFT -ENGINE EXHAUST X TAILPIPE COMPOSITE
F.IGHT ENGINE EXHAUST
NA
RIGHT AFTER CONVERTER
~ ILP1PE COMPOSITE
1 NA
1. NA 2! RIGHT AFTER CONVERTER
2. RIGHT-ENGINE EXHAUST 3. TAILPIPE COMPOSITE
r
\.
^ NA
;.A 7. LEFT AFTER CONVERTER
LEFT ENGINE EXHAUST 3. TAILPIPE COMPOSITE
I
1 NA I! LEFT AFTER CONVERTBH
2. LEFT ENGINE EXHAUST 3- TAILPIPE COMPOSITE
N-4
-------
APPENDIX N
LISTING OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST EMISSION RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
von
NO.
001
„
003
004
YEAR MAKE MODL CIS)
1975 CHEV TRUC 350
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
1975 CHEV TRUC 350
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
1975 CHEV TRUC 350
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
1975 CHEV TRUC 350
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
30MPH 50MPH
(15) (3D
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
on upu
j\j nrn
IDLE CD)
IDLE (N)
(15) (31)
50 MPH
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
IDLE $> )
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
IDLE (N;
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
£(3D
MPH
MPH
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
TTW tf ir\\
IDUS \O)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
IDLE u>)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE CD)
IDLE (N)
(15) (3D
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
HC
—
—
M
—
™
—
.»_
—
„_
—
_rf_
—
™
_
_
_.
_
~
~
—
^^
—
_
__
«
—
—
—
_
KlUtt
CO NQX
H/l ._,
_
— _.
—
_
—
_
— M m __ m
—
„ .
—
.. ...
_ -__
— ~—
—
—
— —
.. _
_ _
.. ...
—
N/A —
— —
— —
— —
_ —
— —
.. -
_ —
.. ...
.. ...
.. ...
— —
N/A —
— —
_ —
_ —
I CJUU
02
—
~™
H
—
—
—
—
^
—
—
_
_
— —
—
—
—
_
_
..
—
_
—
—
—
—
—
, r
~
H
_
_ .
- -
—
_
_
win a
HC
—
*"~
._
—
—
—
—
zz
—
—
_
_
••—
—
—
—
..
_
,..
—
_
—
—
—
—
—
,__
__
_
__
—
"*
—
__
_
ISTEM '••
CO NOX 02
_ _
_w ir _M
-M JLI^ «>
_ _
_ _
_ _
^^ _,— „ _,__,
_
M/» _ . . _.
_ ... ..
_ ~
— — —
_ _
— — —
... _
_ _ _
_ _— ..
N/A
— — —
_ — _
— —
_ — —
— — —
± _ ^ „ —x.
— _— —
— — _
— — — _
— _«. «
tf/A
— — —
« ^_. __
— —
HC CO
I PITT I?
35 0.50
100 1.50
?30 1740
45 0.50
80 1.20
__ — -•
125 2.40
_ _
— —
— —
zz zz
— _
__ _,
75 1.65
75 0.55
280 7.90
320 7.30
80 1.70
75 0.50
250 7.90
310 7.20
— —
— —
_
_ _
_ _
— —
— LEFT El
110~.00
130 3.90
Tso oTso
110 4.25
130 3.00
Tio TToo
— —
_--,. __
—
— —
— __
— —
UStS I
NOX
XHAUST
1070
460
12i4
593
~48
—
—
—
zzz
—
KHAUST
45
1468
665
52
—
—
__
...
—
CHAUST
542
399
If
399
~32
—
_
—
— —
— .
exHAu;
02
4.3
5.3
5i2
sTg
—
—
—
zz
—
0.6
0.8
0.2
0.3
0.6
0.8
0.2
0.3
—
—
..
_
..
—
^_
3.7
4.3
3-9
4.5
eTs
—
__
_
..
..
..
—
— LEFT EXHAUST —
60 0.45
18 ?:B
150 1.10
65 0.50
90 0.30
145 1.80
140 1.10
— —
1791
i|
fe
32
—
5.1
5.2
I'.l
5.0
5.4
7.4
8.6
—
SI 5ISTH1
HC CO NOX 02
- LFT AFTER CONV -
20 0.03 1119 3.1
90 1.80 501 2.9
T40 aToo ~~37 T.o
30 0.03 1244 2.9
100 1.80 645 2.7
« *«. m_ - —
150 2.80 42 2.7
— — — —
— — — —
_ _ — _
zz zz zzz n
_ _ — _
r on* APTPP C(\UU
H LtT 1 nr iCM \JJni ~
60 1.60 1318 0.3
45 0.05 430 0.2
255 7.60 35 0.1
300 6.80 26 0.1
55 1.45 1219 0.2
35 0.07 450 0.2
260 7.40 3§ 0.0
305 6.90 29 0.0
_ _ — _
— — — __
_ __ ._
— _ _ _
_ ..
— — — _
- LFT AFTER CONV -
75 1.00 501 1.0
50 0.06 409 2.5
~40 0?02 ~~31 8?5
50 2.80 460 1.3
50 1.00 327 1.9
35 0.02 26 8.6
_ _ — _
_ M ... _
—
.. .. ... _
_ ... _
_ ...
_
- LFT AFTER CONV -
30 0.03 1542 4.1
40 0.02 726 4.3
40 0.02 101 5.6
45 0.02 31 7.4
30 0.02 1542 4.0
30 0.02 890 4.4
40 0.02 108 5.5
35 0.02 31 7.4
— — — —
D
IDLE (N)
REPLICATE 50 MPH
°05 1975 DODG TRUC 318 (15) (3D
BEFORE MTCE 50 MPH
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
N/A
N/A
— LEFT EXHAUST
20 0.15 10
30 0.15 11.
90 1.55 59
90 1.45 46
20 1.40 111
35 2.10 11
85 1.50
90 1.50
— - LFT AFTER CONV -
1194 0.9
1244 0.7
60 0.7
THREE MODE TEST EMISSION RESULTS ARE: HC - PPM/HEX, CO - %, UHCOHRECTED NOX - PPM
H-5
-------
APPENDIX N.CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST EMISSION RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
*U11
NO.
006
007
rtnfl
Ul/O
009
010
fEAR MAKE MODL CID
1975 FORD TRUC 302
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
1975 FORD TRUC 302
BEFORE MICE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
1QV5 FORI5 TRW V»1
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
1975 FORD TRUC 351
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
1975 CMC TRUC 350
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
30MPH*50MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D}
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
(15) (3D
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
-._, /Q«\
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
LMPH
MPH
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
(15) (31)
pu Pirn
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
IDLE IN)
50 MPH
OQ hPH
MM
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
LMPH
(D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
IDLE IN)
50 MPH
HC CO NOX 02 HC CO NOX
- RIGHT EXHAUST -
170 4.00 440 3.8
175 3.90 131 3.9
55 1.80 20 4.0
150 4.00 430 3.7
155 3.90 118 3.8
— — _ __ j _
40 1.75 18 4.0
.. .. ... -
_ .. ... ..
_ ... ... ..
_ _ _ —
_ — . ... — _
_. .. ... _
- RIGHT EXHAUST -
65 2.80 ^89 5.4
80 o:&0 22 &:5
70 2.70 409 5.3
90 2.80 164 5.7
90 1.70 60 7.9
75 0.55 20 8.9
— — — —
_ _ _ _
.. _ ... _
_ _ ... ..
_ _ _ _
STOUT RVHIIIST
"21 0.40 1045 4To
25 0.35 716 6.0
25 0.25 111 8.9
20 0.15 22 10.2
25 0.30 1393 4.1
25 0.20 696 5.9
20 0.30 116 9.2
15 0.17 24 10.1
_ _ — _
_
_ .. ... _
— — — —
_ ... _
— _ — —
- RIGHT EXHAUST -
95 1.10 1194 3.8
110 0.30 655 4.5
1JO 2.40 80 5.2
80 2.00 28 6.0
95 1.00 1294 4.0
110 0.50 737 4.5
130 2.30 88 5.5
80 2.00 32 6.3
_ _ — _
_ _ „ _
— — — —
~ ~ ~ ~
— — — —
_. _ ... _
__ _ — _
_ _ — _
_ _ — _
— — — —
- RT
1
_
20
—
_
_
__
~~
- RT
10
20
20
10
25
—
—
...
^.
_
..
(_
_
_
—
™~
—
_
_
—
__
—
_
_
_
~"~
—
—
—
—
—
_
—
—
—
—
AFTER CONV
0.25 450
0.06 161
0 04 38
0.23 450
0.03 159
.. ••—
0.03 40
__ ___
z z:
_ ...
_ _
.. ...
— —
AFTER CONV
0.20 491
0.06 207
0.04 80
0.03 42
0.20 511
0.05 227
0.02 101
0.02 42
— —
— —
_ ...
._ __
— —
U/JI
.. ._
_ -
_ ...
z ~
— —
— —
_ ....
._
— —
.. ...
— —
— N/A
_ __
_ ._
_ ...
— —
— —
_ _
— —
N/A —
,_ j _,
— —
— —
—
— —
02
oTg
3:1
1.1
_
3.6
_,_
—
_
—
_
H
2*.0
?:1
—
—
«
^_
~—
_^_
_
_
_
—
•W
—
_
_
„-„
—
_
_
..
~~
—
—
—
—
..
—
—
»
—
11 LiATJ. (UUU1UOA OlOlCn
HC CO NOX 02 HC CO
N/A
— —
w — — —
— — —
... _ .--
— .— ...
— — __
— — —
.. .. •-•
— — —
• • ™™™™™ Pi/ A ~"~~~
_ _ —
_ _ —
_ _ —
Z Z ~
_ _ __
__ -,, __^__
— ~~ ™—
U/A
_ — «-«.
_ _ ...
_ — ...
Z Z ~
.. .. •••
_ _ —
.. — ...
_ .. ...
— — __
.. _ ...
— — —
N/A
_ _ —
.. .. —
_ ...
_ _ —
_ _ —
.. .. ...
— —
— LEFT EXHAUST
30 0.21 1045
60 0.40 511
60 o:lo 36
80 0:50 573
60 0.50 38
_ _ —
.. _ ...
— — —
—
—
_
—-L
z
..
_
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
_
w-
—
__
..
..
..
—
—
—
..
_
—
_
—
—
_
..
_
—
—
••
—
—
I:l
S:8
7.5
.
— —
— _
_ _
— ..
— ~
— .
.. _
— —
— —.
— —
_ ..
— —
—
— — .
— . K_
— —
_ ~~
_ ..
_ ..
— ..
Z Z
- -
_ —
.. —
— —
.. —
_ —
~
.. .-
— —
— . —
— —
_ —
~ -
— • •"•
""LFT"AI
•• •
NOX
N/A —
—
___
—
—
ml
,
_m _
N/A —
—
—
—
—
...
_„_
—
N/A
— .
.—
...
— '-•
—
_ __
.—
—
•—
—
— -
N/A —
—
— •
— •
—
—
—
~"
?TERO»
«A min
1 II I
1 i 1
30 o.r
'* IJW
02
—
__
^
—
^
_
—
—
—
—
—
_
__
—
—
—
—
—
,
—
—
—
—
•*~
^
*~
—
—
~"
~~
—
—
—
__
—
6:0
a
lj.lt
8.5 30 o.oj y '"
—
_
—
— —
__
— —
.. • "
— "
—
_ - —
-
-
—
IDLE (N) __ — _ __ — _ __ — — —
FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST EMISSION RESULTS ARE: HC - PPM/HEX, CO - %, UNCORRECTED NOX - PPM
N-6
-------
APPENDIX N.CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST EMISSION RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
VEH H.P. —
NO. YEAR MAKE MODL CID 30MPH 50MPH
HC
DENVER
RIGHT EXHAUST SYSTEM
CO NOX 02 HC CO NOX 02
LEFT EXHAUST SYSTEM
HC CO NOX 02 HC 00 NOX
02
011 1975 AMD HORN 258 (12) (26)
BEFORE MTCE 50 MPH
N/A
N/A
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
012 1975 BUIC CNTY 350
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
(D
IDLE (N
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
(15) (3D
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
" PB
- - M
IDLE (N)
AFTER MTCE 50 MPH
REPLICATE
013 1975 BUIC HIVI 455
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
Oil 1975 BUIC REGA 350
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
015 1975 CADI ELDO 500
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
IDLE
(18) (36)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
(15) (3D
50 MPH
" MPH
(D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
(D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
(18) (36)
50 MPH
MPH
50 MPH
30 MPfl
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
IDLE
60
- RIGHT EXHAUST -
340 10.00 "
370 9.60
740 10.00
1200 9.50
100 10.00
ISO 10.00
7.00
9.C
1000 9.00
.00
.00
1.50
550 2.00
— 10.00
7-QO
240
240
420
1.70
2.70
- T.P. COMPOSITE -
10 10.00 62 0.1
" 9.80 106 0.0
00 9.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
8.60
— LEFT EXHAUST
95 0.70 2463
140 0.50 1443
210 1.10 470
130 1.30 116
70 0.70 2115
140 1.10 1343
215 2.25 307
155 2.40 106
39 0.65 1692
50 0.49 757
100 0.65 "~
80 0.75 r
70 15$
— 13
0.3 — •— —- —
0.
0.
i:3
N/A
N/A
N/A
10 10.00
22
2.50
10.00
7.40
2:8
— LEFT EXHAUST —
101
111
280 10.00
260 7.20
2.50
._- 2.90
190 10.00
190 7.00
210 2.50
320 2.90
N/A
N/A
N/A —
N/A
THREE MODE TEST EMISSION RESULTS ARE: HC - PPH/HEX, CO - %, UNCORRECTED NOX - PPM
N-7
-------
APPENDIX N.CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST EMISSION RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
NO. YEAR MAKE MODL CID
016 1975 CHEV VEGA 140
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
30MPH 50MPH
( 9) (21)
50 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE
50
IDLE
IDLE
50
30
IDLE
IDLE
(N)
MPH
MPH
(D)
(N)
MPH
MPH
(D)
(N)
HC
CO
- RIGHT E
90 0.80
130 0.80
240 5.10
90 0.80
120 0.50
170
50
60
^
45
._
150
3.40
1.35
1.20
2.00
1.05
1.10
_.
2.10
NOX
02 HC CO
XHAUST -
849 1.1
890 2.0
Is TTe
829 1.0
849 2.3
73
1219
522
64
1294
511
65
1.8
?•"
4.6
5.0
1:1
_ _
5.1
- RT
55
50
230
k
170
40
60
160
40
45
170
NOX
AFTER CONV
0.50 624
0.60 491
4.80 45
0.50 4Q1
0.40 309
3.20
1.20
1.70
2.30
1:8
2.30
44
1443
542
1$
583
43
02 HC CO NOK 02 HC CO NOX 02
•» ... . N/A ^«-
8:1 ~ ~ — z
0 I)
0.6 — — — —
0,5 — — — — »™ -•-
Qslj w _
0.3 — — — —
0,5 — — __ _
Q*3 __. __ ___ _._
•M — ~_ __. .»
0.3 — — — —
— — ^_^ ^^
~ — — _
— — -.-.
— — — —
— — — _
— — — »—— __
— — —
017 1975 CHEV
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
018 1975 CHEV MONT 350
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
019 1975 CHEV CAPR 350
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
020 1975 CHEV IMPA 350
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
IDLE
IDLE
IDLE (N
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (DJ
IDLE (N)
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
IDLE CD;
IDLE (N
- RIGHT
85 0.68 1368 0.9
Q'.
- RT AFTER CONV —
30 0.07 655 1.6
30 0.02 696 3.5
28 o'.55 696 ll§
20 0.02 962 3.2
25 0.03 1244
35 0.04
- RT AFTER CONV —
7ixw ••,;
470 0.8
179 0.9
30 0.6
880 0.1
573 0.8
317 0.8
2.00
0.06
0.06
0.06
2.10
0.04
0.04
0.03
- RIGHT EXHAUST - - RT AFTER CONV ~
220
250
100
1i "
1.70 119
1.40
0.40
0.50
2.10
8:1 *&
2.00 ig
0.20 ..,
0.55 88
2.20 1045
1.20 491
0.40 348
0.10 90
0.6
0.4
1.1
1.1
0.4
0.5
0.9
1.0
145
80
1 WT./
%l
0.17
2.00
1.00
0.50
0.90
- RIGHT EXHAUST -
70
73
0.7
0.6
35
IDLE
40
50 1.00
g 8:51
N/A
N/A —
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A —
N/A --
N/A
FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST EMISSION RESULTS ARE: HC - PPM/HEX, CO - %, UNCORRECTED NOX - PPM
M-8
-------
APPENDIX N.CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST EMISSION RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
YEAR MAKE MODL CID
H.P.
30MPH 50MPH
HC
DENVER
RIGHT EXHAUST SYSTEM
CO NOX 02 HC CO NOX
02 HC CO
LEFT EXHAUST SYSTEM
NQX 02 HC CO NOX
02
021 1975 CHEV STAW 100
BEFORE MICE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
022 1975 CHRY NEWP 100
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
023 1975 DODG CORO 318
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
024 1975 DODG DART 225
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
°25 1975 FORD MUST 110
BEFORE MICE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
(18) (36)
(15) (3D
50 MPH
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
—
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
(12) (26)
"50 MPH
MPH
- RIGHT EXHAUST -
50 0.80 1070 1.6
1555°
RT AFTER CONV
0.05 1015
N/A ~
N/A —
- RIGHT EXHAUST -
- RT AFTER CONV
25 1.00 717
30 0.05 63
180 O.C
3.00 378 0.8
1.70 317 0.9
90 1.
1.6
RIGHT
30 1.10 1J|
75 2.60 6_.
60 2.30 11
30 10.00 27
50 0.75 1617
80 2.00 778
70 9-50 11
30 9-70 30
35 1.00 11H
00 1.65 583
80 0.90 151
10 1.25 93
90 1.00 1211
?8 1:J8 ft
30 1.80 93
0.9
0.5
0.8
0."8
0.1
0.8
0.8
- HT AFTER CONV —
10 0.08 829 0.8
" 2.00 573 0.6
2.50 29 1.7
9.10 23 2.2
0.20 522 0.6
530 9.5Q 25 2.Q
60 0.32
180 1.90
200 I.JO
110 0.60
- RIGHT EXHAUST -
160 §.20 307 3.0
126
.00
- RT AFTER CONV —
2.50 266 0.8
0 3.20 76 0.6
90
200
300
150
210
290
100 1.75
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A —
N/A —
N/A —
THREE MODE TEST EMISSION RESULTS ARE: HC - PPM/HEX, CO - J, UNCORRECTED NOX - PPM
H-9
-------
APPENDIX N.CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST EMISSION RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
VEH
NO. YEAR
MAKE MODL CID
H.P. —
30MPH 50MPH
HC CO
DENVER
RIGHT EXHAUST SYSTEM
NOX 02 HC CO NOX 02
HC CO
LEFT EXHAUST SYSTEM
NOX 02 HC CO NOX 02
0?6 1975
027 1975
FORD TORI 351
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
FORD GRAN 250
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
(15) (3D
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
(12) (26)
50 MPH
(D
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDL
IDLE
IDLE (D)
(N)
AFTER MTCE 50 MPH
IDLE
028 1975
REPLICATE
FORD LTD 351
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
029 1975
030 1975
D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
(15) (3D
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE D)
IDLE (N)
AFTER MTCE 50 MPH
REPLICATE
FORD LTD 400
BEFORE MICE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
MERC MARQ 400
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
(18) (36)
- RIGHT EXHAUST -
0.70 624 8.5
9.9
11.7
12.4
8.4
9.4
28 11.0
14 12.0
- T
:TE - — LEFT EXHAUST — - LFT AFTER CONV -
1.00 1003
125
II
70
125
60
- RIGHT EXHAUST -
30 1.55 696 2.4
115 1.80 222 4.9
60 7.6
12 8.9
655 2.7
1.70 247 4.9
2.20 67 7.8
~ 11 9.0
120 1.20
55 0.50
40 1.00
50 1.30
110 1.20
55 0.50
- RIGHT EXHAUST -
65 2.15 819 3.0
4.00 90
2.80 45
100 2.
80
"
45 4.
18 6.
1.70 18 6.5
2.20 921 2.9
.00 111 2.7
20 6.7
542 7.5
72 7.4
33 10.0
15 11.0
18 "
53 10.1
17 10.9
- RIGHT EXHAUST -
85 0.68 1095 0.6
110 1.70 276 0.3
195 4.00 108 0.4
IDLE
0 0.60
0 1.70
110 1.
0 1.
0 0.55
5 1.30 1
2.
48 5.9
P. COMP
0.45
0.80
0.75
28 0.1
0.0
0 0.04
583 7.
204 11.
42 12.9
23 13-7
501 10.
209 11.
12.2
13-3
3.10 61
K40 1144
1.50 634
2.20 87
1.50 14
- RT AFTER CONV
COMPOSITE -
40 860 0.2
60 176
61
0
921
207
— LEFT EXHAUST —
150 3.40 921 0.
4.70 186 0.
8.50 50 0.
0.90 15 7.
1070 6.
.20 227 0.
310 7.80 66 0.
75 1.
- LFT AFTER CONV -
66 0.90 11
1.30
70
100 0.90
65 0.60
50 0.80 11
50 1.10
90 0.70
60 0.60
0.15 156
0.10 54
0.40 1194
0.30 368
0.20
0.09 56
LFT AFTER CONV -
0.50 614
T.P.
40 1.10
0 2.20
2.00
0.70
1.10
1.60
1.40
0.75
— LEFT EXHAUST
•25 72
2.80 8
2.90
1.
1.
2.20 106
2.90 50
1.00 20
542 5.6
70 6.7
56 12.6
I
,7 6.1)
54 12.0
28 12.0
0.48
0.45
0.02
0.01
0.4
0.7
0.6
0.0
1.00 614 4.4
1.50 76 4.2
AFTER CONV -
.48 945
307
1.90 7«
0.48 50
0.50 114
8:i Si
0. _
0.05
0.15
0.80 1
1.40
2.30 10
1.00
20 0.20
25 0.-
15 0.
40 0.50 870 2.
40 1.00 222 2.
~ 1.30 118 4.
3-6
25 0.90 202 2.5
\1
80 .
50 0.70 72
25 0.40 941
25 0.90 202
70 1.50 113
30 0.90 80
FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST EMISSION RESULTS ARE: HC - PPM/HEX, CO - >, UNCORRECTED NOX - PPM
N-10
-------
APPENDIX N.CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST EMISSION RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
mi
YEAR MAKE MODL CID
DENVER
H.P. — RIGHT EXHAUST SXSTEM
30MPH 50MPH HC CO NOX 02 HC CO NOX 02
LEFT EXHAUST SYSTS4 —
HC CO NOX 02 HC CO NOX 02
«1 1975 MERC M3NG 351
M1 BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
032 1975 OLDS DELT 350
BEFORE MICE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
033 1975 OLDS CUTL 350
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
03* 1975 OLDS DELT 455
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
1975 PL1M FURX 318
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
(15) (31)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
" MPH
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
(15) (3D
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
(D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
'f 1
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
KPH
MPH
IDLE
MPH
MPH
(D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
MPH
ISLE (D)
IDLE (N)
- RIGHT EXHAUST -
60 2.10 696 2.7
85 2.40 138 2.8
160 2.40 38 4.6
135 1.40 14 5.8
50 2.00 614 2.6
70 2.60 146 2.7
150 2.40 40 4.J
- T.P. COMPOSITE - - LEFT EXHAUST - - LPT AFTER CONV -
130 1.50
5.e
40 1.40 430 1.8
50 2.20 §7 2.1
100 3.00 42 4.0
8 '•"
.50
1.70 4i
50
105 3.20
50 1.50
- RIGHT EXHAUST -
155 2.90 573 0.
190 1.70 317 0.
360 4.40 103 0.
430 4.40 45 0.
160 2.
240
RIGHT EXHABST -
2.60
2.00
266
280 0.90 131 3-0
1000 0.80 37 4.4
- RIGHT
100
140
210 0.
490 0.50 36
100 2.00 675
150 1.50 43"
200 0.40
520 0.55
- RT AFTER CONV
160 2.90 522
1.30 266
4.50 98
34
0.7 135
0.4 170
- RT AFTER CONV
2.80 839 0.5
125 2.
170 3.
25 0.
70 0.0
130 2.30
190 3.40
40 0.04
25 0.03
- RT AFTER
90 1.85
140 1.80
55 0.
1*5° I:..
140 2.10
50 0.05
90 0.05
CONV —
- RT AFTER CONV
25 0.05 1443 1-0
30 0.05 737 0.6
70 0.55 60 0.4
25 0.10
20 0.05 1
30 0.05 - -
30 0.20 4
0.5
0.
919 0.
45
40 1.30 593
2.40 -'-
60
70 1.90
1.20
1.50 614
3-2
2.5
12 2.3
16 5.*
131
65 2.00
50 1.40
N/A —
N/A
N/A
N/A —
., 0.4 — —
0.05 63 0.7 — —
30 0.0
40 0.0
25 0.0. _
30 0.05 71
20 0.05 1
30 0.05
20 0.05 1-
25 0.05 78
— N/A —
N/A
N/A
THREE MODE TEST EMISSION RESULTS ARE: HC - PPM/HEX, CO - J, UNCORRBCTED NOX - PPM
H-ll
-------
APPENDIX N.CONT'D
LISTING OP FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST EMISSION RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
VEH
NO. YEAR MAKE MODL CID
DENVER
RIGHT EXHAUST SYSTEM
3QMPH 50MPH HC CO NOX 02 HC CO NOX 02
LEFT EXHAUST SYSTEM
HC CO NOX 02 HC CO NOX
02
036 1975 PLYM DUST 225
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
037 1975 PONT CATA 400
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MICE
REPLICATE
038 1975 PONT LEMA 350
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
039 1975 PONT GRNV 455
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
040 1976 CAPR SEDA 140
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MICE
REPLICATE
(I?)
M/ft
n/A
N/A
n/jt
IDLE (N)
50 HfH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
(15) (3D
50 MPH
IDLE (N
50
IDLE
50 MPH
MPH
MPH
81
(N)
(12) (26)
50 MPH
50
30
fiL
IDLE
MPH
"B
L^BO
fma
IDLE (N)
LMPH
MU
(D)
IDLE (N)
100 YM 15V
90 1.50 522
— — — — ~ ~ — s 3720
230 4.60 491 "0.8
0 614 2.7
2'.40 T49
*p jsj ^
300 8.40 55
190 4.70 995
280 7.50 227
420 4?90 ~32
180 4.80 120
270 7.30 337
370 6720 ~~48
- RT AFTER CONV —
150
50
150
4.10
0.60
0.03
0.04
- RT AFTER CONV —
120
100
80
2.7
1.80 151
0.05 101
0.05 64
2.30 409
1.50 176
0.05 111
0.05 57
- HT AFTER
10 0.45
250 7.40
115 1.85 1518
130 2.10 655
120 §780 ~~63
110 1.60 1791
120 2.25 634
125 4.60 68 3.8
N/A
120
N/A
N/A
0.1 — —
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST EMISSION RESULTS ARE: HC - PPM/HEX, CO - >, UNCORRECTED NOX - PPM
H-12
-------
APPENDIX N.CONT'D
LISTIHG OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST EMISSION RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
80? YEAR MAKE MODL CID
DENVER
H.P. — RIGHT EXHAUST SYSTEM
30MPH 50MPH HC CO NOX 02 HC CO NOX
02 HC CO
LEFT EXHAUST SYSTEM
NOX 02 HC CO
NOX 02
1975 MIS ». H?CE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
a"21"5 HOW) B^OREMTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
043 1975 TOYO CORO 133
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
1975
VOLK SEDA
BEFORE
1975
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
VOLK STAW 90
BEFORE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
( 9) (21)
50 MPH
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50
30
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
N/A —
(12) (26)
50 MPH
IDLE
IDLE (N)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
MPH
W
IDLE (N)
MPH
LEFT EXHAUST —
5 3.80 1542 3.1
5 1.20 1144 4.2
N/A —
N/A
N/A —
N/A
N/A
N/A —
1592 5.0
j< W
1667 5.0
_. ... 1020 5.1
190 4.00 61 6.1
50 1.15 43 6.2
N/A —
__ ___ ___ _ ^
50 1.50 1294
95 0.95 945
110 0.30 161
0.29 54
4.6
n
- RIGHT EXHAUST -
230
155
1.40 2190
2.20 1393
1.50 258
2.00 116
0.8
-------
APPENDIX N.CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL THBEE MODE TEST EMISSION RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
VEH
NO. YEAR MAKE MODL CID
— H P —~
30MPH*5CMPH
HC CO
DENVER
RIGHT EXHAUST SYSTEM
NOX 02 HC CO NOX
02 HC CO
LEFT EXHAUST SYSTEM
NOX 02 HC CO NOX
02
231 1975 AMMO GREM 232 (12) (26)
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
232 1975 AMMO HORN 304 (12) (26)
BEFORE MTCE 50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
REPLICATE 50 MPH
' 30 MPl
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
233 1975 AMMO
N/A
N/A --
— LEFT EXHAUST —
100 0.90 2:
150 0.20 2
— T80 i»T20
1.20 1
0.30 1
"Z~Z ~ — — ~ 170 4?40 "
N/A
N/A
(15) (31)
N/A
N/A
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
234 1975 BUIC SOH 231
BEFORE P-
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
235 1975 BUIC SKYL 260
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
- RT AFTER CONV —
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50
175
190
170
150
2.60 1269
1.25 I"'
2.10 12'
1.70
3.10 1
IDLE
IDLE
50
70
2.50
2.10
— 1
120 3.40 56
60 2.10 819
90 1.50 645
120 1770 ~ll
— LEFT EXHAUST —
90 0.90
120 0.60
145 2.40
100 1.50 _
110 1.00 81
125 O.r "
150 2.
115 1.
N/A —
LFT AFTER CONV -
60 0.10 767 3.0
0 0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.0
60 0.
110 0.51
0.
180 0.
65 0.
105 0.
195 0.72
0.10
0.04
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.05
0.04
0.05
0.00
0.00 219
0.00 7
0.00 4
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
N/A —
N/A —
FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST EMISSION RESULTS ARE: HC - PPM/HEX, CO - %, UNCORRECTED NOX - PPM
N-U
-------
APPENDIX N,CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST EMISSION RESULTS
OS INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
Foa WAR
236 1975
23
2W 1975
2« 1975
245 1975
MAKE MODL CID
BUIC REGA 350
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER HTCS
REPLICATE
BUIC STAW 350
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
BUIC RIVI 455
nnpj fft.lpp
H&ruLlsftle>
AFTER MTCS
CHEV VEGA 140
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
CHEV MONZ 140
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
H.P. --
30MPH 50MPH
(15) (3D
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
(15) (31)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
on upu
f m p (n\
Tn? p /MI
50 MPH
on upu
IDLE (D)
TT1T R f H i
30 MPH
Tni v tn}
TT1I R i Ml
en IfPii
?n MPH
fni o (T)\
Tf\i p fn\
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
rni R fNi
on upu
( 9) (21)
50 MPH
30 MPH
T|\l P /|\\
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
IDLE (N)
(12) (36)
en UDU
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
50 MPH
30 Urn
IDLE IDJ
IDLE (N)
50 Mrn
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
TTW p run
RIGHT EXHAUST SYSTEM
HC CO NOX 02 HC CO NOX 02
- RIGHT EXHAUST -
80 3.10 634 1.0
110 4.10 189, 0.9
180 1.70 128 1.4
170 2.50 53 1.3
70 3.20 614 0.9
105 4.00 212 0.9
190 3.20 111 1.3
195 4.00 55 1.2
85 2.20 870 0.4
100 3.00 286 0.3
140 0.80 166 2.3
120 1.60 63 1.5
60 1 60 962 0.4
100 3 00 276 0 2
90 0.80 128 2 3
100 1 50 50 15
- RIGHT EXHAUST -
110 3.70 4Q1 0.9
60 5 20 146 0 8
330 5 50 84 0 9
520 7 50 57 0 9
65 4 80 307 0 5
75 5.40 121 0*8
150 4 50 81 10
ion _ "Bo 53 l"o
60 3 40 511 02
110 4 60 186 0*1
?oo 9*50 UB n"?
2nn o fin fin n o
60 3 60 466 0 1
105
190 3.80 870 0.2
205 tf.50 161 0.2
205 2.80 133 0.3
175 3 1m hn n 5
iRn ii on i
-------
APPENDIX N.CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST EMISSION RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
VEH
NO. YEAR MAKE MODL CID
H.P. —
30HPH 50MPH
HC CO
DENVER
RIGHT EXHAUST SYSTEM
NOX 02 HC CO NOX
02
HC CO
LEFT EXHAUST SYSTEM
NOX 02 HC CO NOX
02
246 1975 CHEV MONZ 262
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
247 1975 CHEV NOVA 250
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
248 1975 CHEV NOVA 262
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
249 1975 CHEV CAMA 350
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
250 1975 CHEV NOVA 350 (12) (26)
BEFOREMICE 50 MPH
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
- RIGHT
160 1.70
180 3.10
300 4.80
1.35 1567 0.4
0.40 995 0.2
1.40
1.20
1.10
0.30
1.60
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE CD)
IDLE (N)
- RIGHT
155 4.00 1
195 4.20
2
270 4
155 5-00 1
200 5.60
4.30 1
4.00
- RT AFTER CONV
150 4.00 111
.70 1045
.00 450
'
- RIGHT EXHAUST -
- RT AFTER CONV
100
250 6.80 "77 0.3
270 6.60 53 0.4
N/A —
N/A ~
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A —
N/A
N/A
FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST EMISSION RESULTS ARE: HC - PPM/HEX, CO - %, UNCORRECTED NOX - PPM
H-16
-------
APPENDIX N.CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL THREE HODE TEST EMISSION RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
VEH
NO. YEAR MAKE MODL CID
DENVER
H.P. ~ RIGHT EXHAUST SYSTEM
30MPH 50MPH HC CO NOX 02 HC CO NOX
02 HC CO
LEFT EXHAUST SYSTEM
NOX 02 HC CO NOX
02
252 1975 CHEV
MALI 350 (15) (3D
BEFORE MICE 50 MPH
IDLE ....
REPLICATE 50 MPH
AFTER MICE
REPLICATE
253 1975 CHEV MALI 350
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
258 1975 CHEV CAPR 350
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
260 1975 CHEV IMPA 350
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
261 1975 CHEV IMPA 350 (15) (3D
BEFORE MICE 50 MPH
MPH
REPLICATE
AFTER MICE
REPLICATE
160 2.50 1003 0.5
90 0.58 491 2.5
160 0.25
IS
(15) (3D
50 MPH
RIGHT EXHAUST -
5 0.45 1045 2.
0.15
1.20
1.25 44 4.3
0.42 1045 2.4
0.18 430 3.3
82 4.6
43 4.3
- RT AFTER CONV
15 0.05 491
IQ o.o
0.12
0.08
o!65 146
0.40
0.20
0.40
0.55
(15) (3D
50 MPH
- RIGHT EXHAUST -
10 0.31 696 3.2
20 0.09 307 4.
0.
0.70
10
50 0.88
60 0.75
- RT AFTER CONV
1.50 1003
1.00 460
6.00
FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST EMISSION RESULTS ARE: HC - PPM/HEX, CO - %, UNCORRECTED NOX - PPM
H-17
-------
APPENDIX N.CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST EMISSION RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
VEH
NO. YEAR MAKE MODL CID
H.P. —
30MPH 50MPH
HC CO
DENVER
RIGHT EXHAUST SYSTEM
NOX 02 HC CO NOX
02 HC CO
LEFT EXHAUST SYSTEM .
NOX 02 HC CO NOX 02
262 1975 CHEV M>A 350
BEFORE MICE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
263 1975 CHEV CAPR 400
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
264 1975 CHEV IMPA 400
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
266 1975 CHEV CAPR 1
BEFORE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
267 1975 CHRY CORD 360
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MICE
REPLICATE
- RT AFTER CONV —
80 1.60 266 0.
0.03 141 0.
0.
70 2.
100 2.00
25 0.10
20 0.05
N/A —
N/A
MPH
ms (N)
- RIGHT EXHAUST -
5.0
0.70
0.25
0.50
0.15
1.00
0.50
8:8
150 4.00
i 1:8 ffl I:6
.50 56 5.7
5.5
- RT AFTER CONV —
15 0.05 1194 2.3
614 3.2
- RT AFTER
20 0.05
25 0.05
40 0.05
0.05
0.10
0.05
RT AFTp
10 0.04
20 0.04
0.05
0.04
0.03
0.04
0.04
0.04
30
20
10
20
4.80 819 0.4
.40 1244 O.g
..20 65 0."5
5.80 56
5.00 7J8
3.10 1343
4.40 70 0.5
5.00 60 0.4
0.5
0.2
0.2
N/A —
N/A —
N/A
N/A —
1:1 - -
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A —
FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST EMISSION RESULTS ARE: HC - PPM/HEX, CO - %, UNCORRECTBD NOX - PPM
N-18
-------
APPENDIX N.CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL THREE HODE TEST EMISSION RESULTS
OK INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
^ YEAH MAKE MODL CID
H.P. —
30MPH 50MPH
HC CO
DENVER
RIGHT EXHAUST SYSTEM
NOX 02 HC CO NOX
02
LEFT EXHAUST
HC CO NOX 02 HC
CO NOX 02
268 1975 CHRY
™MPH
(D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
270 1975 DODG
fflPE 440
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE 50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
REPLICATE 50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
DART 318 (12) (26)
BEFORE MTCE 50 MPH
- RIGHT EXHAUST -
1490 3.60 634 3.
1500 5.9Q 829 4.
4[4
- RT AFTER COOT —
2000
2000
1650 4.20
1720 0
2000
2000
-- N/A
N/A
IDLE
IDLE
30 MPH — —
IDLE (D) - ~
REPLICATE
(D
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 ?B
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
' ?H
P
IDLE (N
DODG CHAR 360 (15)
BEFORE MTCE 50
30
REPLICATE
AFTER MICE
REPLICATE
273 1975 DODG MONA 400
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
215 1975 FORD MUST 140
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
IDLE
REPLICATE 50
IDLE
- RIGHT EXHAUST -
170 4.30 970
220 3-40 119
240 4.20 "
210 4.60 _
160 4.20 14$
200 2.90 146
220 4.20 12
185 4.30 "
2.90 .
3.70 931 ...
.00 1294 0.1
26 1.4
62 1.2
N/A
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE 50 MPH ~ — — — — ~
- HT AFTER
185
240
250
5.
N/A
N/A
— LEFT EXHAUST —
135 0.68 1617 5.2
- LFT AFTER CONV -
N/A
N/A --
THREE MODE TEST EMISSION RESULTS ARE: HC - PPM/HEX, CO - %, ONCORRBCTED NOX - PPM
N-19
-------
APPENDIX N.CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST EMISSION RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
VEH
H.P. —
NO. YEAR MAKE MODL CID 30MPH 50KPH HC CO
DENVER
RIGHT EXHAUST SYSTEM
NOX 02 HC CO NOX
02
HC CO
LEFT EXHAUST SYSTEM —
NOX 02 HC CO NOX
02
277 1975 FORD MUST 171
BEFORE MICE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
281 1975 FORD GRAN 302
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
282 1975 FORD STAW 351
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
284 1975 FORD TORI 400
BEFORE MICE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
285 1975 FORD LTD 351
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
— LEFT EXHAUST —
140
- LFT AFTER CONV -
"~
- RIGHT
150
230
- RT AFTER CONV
2.60 1493 4.
4.40 460
0.05
0.11 1
0.10
0.05 52
0.25 11
0.20
- RT AFTER CONV
85 0.
- LFT AFTER CONV -
COMPOSITE -
0.90 890 2.9
1.60 95 2
8.20 10
— LEFT EXHAUST
1.40 941
3.00 614 2.5
7.00 116 1.
20 2.50 593
00 11
160 7-60
!00 614 2.
.00 50 5.0
.20 10 6.5
-LFT AFTER CONV -
0.12 1144
0.08
0.0
0.02 50
0.12 126
0.10
0.04
0.03
T.P. COMPOSHB -
40 0.45 1244 3.7
40 0.80 224 3.2
70 2.10 75 2.1
40 1.
40 0.45 1
40 0.80 239
101
50 5.4
IDLE
50 MPH
0 MPH
0 1.30 214 3.3
3.40 63 3.7
50 1.75 32 4.9
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D
IDLE (N
0
25 0.10 207
0.06 85
- LFT AFTER CONV -
- T.P. COMPOSITE -
140
150
250
210
150
170
400 10.00
620 10.00
900 2.
123 2.
FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST EMISSION RESULTS ARE: HC - PPM/HEX, CO - t, UNCORRBCTED NOX - PPM
M-20
-------
APPENDIX N.CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST EMISSION RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
von
HO. YEAR MAKE MODL CID
286 1975 FORD ELIT 351
REPLICATE
AFTER MICE
REPLICATE
SOMPH'SOMPH
(15) (3D
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
HC
— --•• IU.UTII OAIIAUOA oxoicn —
CO NOX 02 HC CO
- RIGHT EXHAUST -
120 1.20 593 0.6
160 1.20 327 0.7
190 2.00 136 1.6
110 1.90 61 1.7
115
li
100
30
30
120
10
1$
1$
1.20
3.60
1.50
2.20
2.05
i:$
0.35
4. '6o
2.50
0.15
511
m
72
501
in
ill
116
0.5
0.7
1.6
1.1
2.2
2.9
J:Z
2.0
0.7
1.1
7.1
- T.
110
160
!i
i'S
155
120
20
110
120
il
110
60
35
NOX
02
P. COMPOSITE -
1.60 583 0.3
1.30 327 0.2
2.10 116 0.5
1.60 69 0.6
1.10
l.-6§
1.50
1.20
1.50
0.50
0.18
1.20
1.60
0.30
0.15
532
138
72
119
221
202
'»
0.2
0.2
0.5
0.6
1.0
0.2
1:1
1.0
0.2
I:)
HC
USTT
CO NOX
— LEFT EXHAUST
135 5.00 552
160 5.20 327
185 2.90 126
105 1.10 6tt
125
110
110
100
11
100
15
55
P
10
1.60
1.00
2.60
1.25
3-50
3.00
2.00
§:S
1.90
o!io
512
ffi
70
110
255
121
51
103
211
133
EXHAUST SISTB1 —
02 HC CO NOX
°~3
0.1
1.2
1.2
0.3
0.5
1.2
1.2
1:1
1:1
2.3
0.3
6.5
02
- LPT AFTER CONV -
110 1.35 532 0.1
155 1.10 327 0.2
180 2.30 131 0.8
90 1-fin isn 1 1
125
ii
80
10
15
130
10
15
125
50
1.60
3.80
1.50
0.90
0.50
0.10
2.20
0.03
0.50
1.80
0.05
0.01
511
368
116
11
119
™
i
0.1
0.2
0.7
1.5
°d
'4
0.6
0.3
5.0
6.5
287 1975 FORD LTD 351
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MICE
REPLICATE
288 1975 FORD TORI 351
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
1975 FORD LTD 100
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MICE
REPLICATE
1975 FORD LTD 100
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
(15) (3D
~ MPH
- RIGHT EXHAUST -
55 1.50 1119 3-5
il
9-5- U
1.00
5.00
5.00
- T.P. COMPOSITE -
— LEFT EXHAUST —
15 1.10 962 3.9
10 1.80 116 - -
- LFT AFTER COOT -
25 0.20 982 3-1
10 1.50 ~
150 5.00
'8
10 60
0.15 1070
5.00 189
5.00 85
5.80 69
0.90 1015
1.20 165
~
55 1.50
120 3.80
1.
1020 2.
159 0.
00 80 1.
1.80 56 1.
1.60 962
(15) (3D
50 MPH
- RIGHT EXHAUST -
80 3.20 1211 1.0
IDLE (N
50 MPH
MPH
(D)
IDLE (N)
.10°
.20
100 10.00
310 10.00
.20 116 0.
.80 21 0.9
15 0.9
— LEFT EXHAUST —
200 8.00 181 0.1
215 8.10 81
1100 10.00 10
10.00
8.60
- LFT AFTER CONV -
0.10
2.00
0.05
0.05
0.10
2.00
- RIGHT EXHAUST -
0 1.10 501 2.1
.60 92 1.8
. COMPOSITE -
1.00 191 3.1
1.60 90
1.80 11
1.10 36 1.
1.10 389 2.5
2.20 70 1.5
2.20 32 1.8
1.20 36 1.1
0.80
1.10
0.10
0.10
0.90
1.50
0.50
0.10
15 2.00 1
20 2.10
0.
1.
10 0.
10 1.
30 2.80
15 1.60
IDLE
PH*ML THREE MODE TEST EMISSION RESULTS ARE: HC - PPM/HEX, CO - %, UNCORRECTED NOX - PPM
N-21
-------
APPENDIX N.CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST EMISSION RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
VEH
NO. YEAR MAKE MODL CID
H.P. —
30MPH 50MPH
DENVER
RIGHT EXHAOST SYSTEM
HC CO NOX 02 HC CO NCK 02 HC CO
LEFT EXHAOST SYSTEM
NCK 02 HC CO NOX 02
293 1975 FORD LTD 460
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
294 1975 LDK CONT 460
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
295 1975 MERC MONA 302
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
297 1975 MERC MONT 351
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MICE
REPLICATE
298 1975 MERC COUG 351
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
18
IDLE ....
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
(12) (26)
50 MPH
MPH
2.
2.
- RIGHT EXHAUST -
55 1.45 972 2.5
90 2.90 161 2.6
170 5.60 26 1.5
110 3.90 26 1.4
40 1.30 972
85 2.90 141 _
440 10.00 20 0.
560 10.00 17 0.
155 4.60 76'
205 6.60 ~
270 6.90
60 2.r-
2J6 6.90 12
280 7.20 ~
65 2.25 2
- RIGHT EXHADST -
20 1.05 655 2.0
" 3.20 101 1.4
- T.P. COMPOSITE -
40 1.15 819 3.7
90 t'.IO 25 2.2
30 1.05 941 4.C
60 2.20 —
425 10.00
490 10.00 18 1.9
_ LEFT
- T.P. COMPOSITE -
20 1.50 552 1.0
116 0.7
20 0.80 757 2.6
40 2.10 156 1.~
80 ^.lO 49 2.
65 2.40 28 3.
15 1.20 6'
45 2.90 128 1.3
B 1:1 II 1:1
- RIGHT EXHAOST -
130 2:8 m '•*
1.7
IDLE
25 0.
35 1..
120 1.70 151
100 0.45 "'
20 0.55
110 1
70 0.55
15 0.3!
25 0.8
coNv-
747 1.1
171 O.I)
0.3
0.1
195 4.70 37I
205 5.50 101
105 3.40
N/A —
N/A
— LEFT EXHAUST
SO 1.75 ?!
£•<
2.
- LPT AFTER COW -
20 0.
§0 0.70
60 0.
FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST EMISSION RESULTS ARE: HC - PPM/HEX, CO - J, UNCORRBCTED NOX - PPM
M-22
-------
APPENDIX N.CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST EMISSION RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
van
NO. YEAR
300 1975
303 1975
307 1975
308 1975
309 1975
MAKE MODL CID
OLDS OMEG 260
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
OLDS STAW 350
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
PLYM DUST 225
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
PLYM SCAM 318
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
PLYM VALI 318
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
30MPH 50MPH
(15) (3D
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
(15) (3D
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
(12) (26)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
(12) (26)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
(12) (26)
50 M?H
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
HC
CO NOX 02 HC CO NOX
- RIGHT EXHAUST -
150 3.20 1443 0.3
l|
130
155
285
120
110
140
240
125
160
3.00 307 0.2
0.12 450 2.8
0.25 156 2.3
3.40 1045 0.3
3.30 250 0.2
0.12 440 2.8
0.23 156 2.6
2.00 1194 1.2
2.30 276 2.1
0.10 317 5-3
0.20 101 4.5
Oi40 440 5.5
0.50 106 5.2
- RIGHT EXHAUST -
110 2.90 583 0.2
290
700
1060
110
280
620
1150
Wo
145
110
170
m
._«
..
..
—
__
__
_ .
..
..
__
—
—
__
__
__
—
_
. .
..
..
„_
—
^—
__
—
—_
— —
._
__
__
_—
__
~
—
3-90 227 0.2
8.90 20 0.5
7 80 17 11
2.80 573 0.3
4.00 215 0.2
9.00 20 0.5
8.00 15 1.1
2.30 532 0.3
3.80 202 0.2
0.25 146 1.4
0.40 126 2.4
4.00 409 0.1
4.40 202 0.2
0.25 106 1.3
0.40 141 2.1
— N/A
__ _ — _—
__ — __
_ — _.
_„ _^_. __
.. ._ —
__ — __
_ ... _
„ __ „
._ ... ..
.. — _.
N/A
— -,_ _.
.. ... —
__ __— __
—
._ ..
.. —
._ ... ..
.. •— ..
.. ._ —
— _
H/A
^M ... ..
.. — — .
.. ._ __
^— ... M—
— . ... ..
— — ... ..
.. -,-n,, ..
— .._ ..
—
- RT
160
130
145
40
70
115
125
125
140
35
40
- RT
280
700
970
120
leo
1175
40
12
110
150
40
15
„
—
~
_^
._
__
„
_
_
~~
~
__
M
__
—
—
__
__
__
__
—
_
__
—
__
_ _
—
.. .
__
__
__
—
—
AFTER CONV
3.50 1194
3.50 296
0.04 430
0.03 151
3.60 1020
3.70 232
0.03 501
0.04 156
2.20 1219
2.40 255
0.05 389
0.05 101
3-50 819
4.00 146
0.05 552
0.05 121
AFTER CONV
4.'20 169
7 20 9
3.20 430
4.20 166
i:D§ I
2.30 430
3.20 191
0.02 48
0.02 57
3.20 409
4.20 111
0.02 46
0.02 60
— N/A
__ «_
» ~
_ —
__. ___
_ «
_. ._
__
_ -—
— _-
N/A
.. ...
_ — —
.. ...
_.
__ __
-,
.. — —
_ __
—
.__ H/A .
.. ...
—
__ _—
.. ... .
_. ...
MM _r |
— ...
__ ._
_
.. —
— —
02
0.2
0.1
1:1
0.2
0.1
2.1
2.3
0.3
0.2
B!2
0.1
1.2
1.2
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.2
1.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
HC
__
~
__
__
__
—
__
—
™*~
—
__
__
_
__
__
__
~~
—
__
—
— —
LEFT EXHAUST SYSTEM
CO NOX 02 HC CO NOX 02
N/A
—
— — ——_
_ —_—
— . _.-
— — ...
—
—
N/fl
« — — —
__ _.
__
__
— — ._—
_ —
_ -,_,^
» - — .
— —
—
__
__
—
_
—
—
—
__
__
—
™
__
__
~"~
--
—
—
— — LEFT EXHAUST —
—
~
—
— —
«
_
_
—
—
_
»
—
-.
__
__
—
__
__
..
—J
___
__
__
_
—
70
140
210
220
70
140
215
225
50
110
125
100
50
115
120
90
L
100
210
140
120
100
185
140
120
95
170
100
75
100
170
130
110
^
120
190
240
125
190
260
250
80
190
170
95
160
210
175
1.00 1144
2.50 573
6.50 52
6.80 40
0.90 1194
2.60 573
0.90 1443
2.60 655
2.60 121
2.40 85
1.00 1169
2.60 573
2.50 121
2.00 83
EFT EXHAUST
0.85 1766
3.60 911
0.60 136
1.10 70
0.55 1941
1.60 1194
0.20 151
0.40 80
0.80 1194
1.60 757
0.30 126
0 50 66
1.20 1294
1 .80 829
0.80 146
1.30 76
EFT EXHAUST
3.00 1642
4.20 1045
9.40 65
9.30 55
2.90 1692
4.00 1169
9.40 63
9.60 55
1.70 1294
1.75 1393
4.60 111
4.00 72
2.00 1443
2.40 1393
3.20 80
2.7
2.6
i:t
3.3
3.3
1.1
0.9
0.9
1.0
1 2
0.8
1.0
1.1
oTj
0.4
1 6
1.1
0.5
2.2
1.0
0.6
2,4
0.9
0.5
1.5
oTe
0.7
0.9
0.7
0.5
0.7
0.9
0.8
1.0
1.0
0.3
0.2
0.8
0.7
0.3
0.3
H fn
— — ~
__
~ ~~ ~
„
— — —
— _»
— __ _
_ _
— T_l — — «
__ ___ J
„ — „ _
~— .» ___ »
— ~ —
_
— — — _«_ H
_— -». __
- LFT AFTER CONV -
20 1.00 491 0.2
160 3-20 614 0.4
240 7.20 48 1.5
215 6.80 42 1.7
20 0.90 450 0.2
160 3.20 593 0-3
250 7.40 48 1.4
220 6.60 44 1.6
10 0.50 501 0.3
100 2.00 430 0.3
110 1.80 111 1.5
80 1.70 86 1.4
20 0.59 378 0.2
90 2.00 430 0.3
120 2.30 103 1.5
85 1.70 82 1.5
- LFT AFTER CONV -
60 1.30 962 2.8
180 2.20 470 2.8
70 0.30 113 3-3
35 0.02 45 3.4
30 0.05 1617 2.9
110 1.00 542 2.6
30 0.04 113 4.0
30 0.05 45 3.5
30 0.05 737 0.5
90 0.90 286 0.2
40 0.05 113 1.5
30 0.05 40 1.3
40 0.90 542 0.2
150 1.80 522 0.2
50 0.05 101 1.1
55 0.20 38 0.6
- LFT AFTER CONV -
80 2.50 1343 0.3
210 4.50 1095 0.2
245 9.20 70 0.9
245 10.00 50 0.7
100 2.50 1542 0.3
200 4.40 1294 0.1
245 9.20 70 0.8
240 10.00 50 0.8
40 0.50 1095 0.4
80 1.60 716 0.1
70 3.00 131 1.2
80 3.00 60 0.2
30 1.00 1269 0.3
30 2.30 1045 0.1
70 3.20 103 0.3
80 3-20 65 0.3
THREE MODE TEST EMISSION RESULTS ARE: HC - PPM/HEX, CO - %, UNCORRECTED NOX - PPM
N-23
-------
APPENDIX N.CONT'D
LISTING OP FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST EMISSION RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH H.P. —
NO. YEAR MAKE MODL CID 30MPH 5QHPH
RIGHT EXHAUST SYSTEM
HCOONOX02 HCOONOX02 HCCONOX02 HCCONOX02
LEFT EXHAUST SYSTEM
IDLE
(5f(&
IDLE H>
IDLE (N
310 1975 PLTW FOOT 318
BEFORE MICE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
311 1975 PLTM FUR* 360
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
312 1975 PLXM FOR! 400
BEFORE MICE
REPLICATE
AFTER MICE
REPLICATE
313 1975 PLXM FOBS 360
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
314 1975 PONT ASTR 140 ( 9) (21)
BEFORE MICE 50 MPH
REPLICATE
IDLE
AFTER MICE 50 MPH
IDLE _
REPLICATE 50 MPH
N/A
N/A
IDLE
50 0.40 1368 1.0
125 1.00 1070 1.1
oifs t
0.65 1
- RIGHT EXHAUST -
iP "
"Si!8
- RIGHT EXHAUST -
100 2.80 532 3.0
1.00 1119 3.6
2.0
110
170
210
210
110
150
210
225
- RIGHT.
RT AFTER CONV
4.10
2.00
4.20
4.00
3:~
_ „ 491 0.1
2.80 911 0.1
.10 61 0.4
.40 55 0.3
.80 440 0.1
.40 890 0.1
.60 66 0.4
.90 57 0.3
- RT AFTER
120 3.00
130 0.90 1
260- 2.BO
210 4.10
125 3.20
230
110
150
215
1.00 1219
4.70 53
4.90 43
w*w^
3.40
T.'
50
20
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
70 0.50
FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST EMISSION RESULTS ARE: HC - PPM/HEX, CO - %, UNCOHRECTED NOX - PPM
N-24
-------
APPENDIX N.CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST EMISSION RESULTS
OH INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
»on
NO. YEAR
316 1975
318 1975
320 1975
321 1975
322 1975
MAKE MODL CID
PONT LEMA 350
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MICE
REPLICATE
PONT LEMA 350
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MICE
REPLICATE
PONT STAW 400
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MICE
REPLICATE
PONT GRNV 455
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MICE
REPLICATE
AUDI FOX 97
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
30MPH 50MPH
(15) (3D
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
LMPH
MPH
(D)
IDLE (N)
(15) (3D
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 HPH
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
(18) (36)
LMPH
MPH
(D)
IDLE (N)
LMPH
(D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
IDLE (N)
(18) (36)
50 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
( 9) (21)
50 MPH
ZDUS (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
jfdj% CD}
IDLE (N)
HC CO NOX 02 HC CO NOX 02
- RIGHT EXHAUST -
205 6.00 399 0.2
240 3.95 501 0.3
160 3.70 113 0.1
180 3-80 49 0.1
180 6.80 317 0.2
190 4.50 491 0.2
230 3-40 116 0.1
255 4.20 52 0.2
150 4.20 1045 0.3
120 1.00 1393 2.4
170 0.30 245 5.1
140 0.70 90 4.1
160 4.80 895 0.2
160 2.60 1144 1.8
160 0.50 245 4.7
130 1.40 90 3-5
- RIGHT EXHAUST -
55 0.65 1866 1.8
105 0.502787 1.2
180 0.15 181 4.7
410 0.25 94 4.4
55 0.45 2438 1.5
105 0.80 3185 0.8
180 0.15 199 4.6
360 0.25 131 3-9
55 0.202339 1.6,
115 0.85 2687 0.8
300 0.15 317 3.3
325 0.30 78 2.2
50 0.20 2190 2.1
120 1.30 2687 0.7
200 0.15 409 3-0
180 0.45 85 1.8
H/A
~ — — - —
_I H ~ 1.
— —
— •. __ _ «
__ — — __
_. __ — _
— — — —
— — — —
- RIGHT EXHAUST -
50 2.00 563 0.4
60 2.20 229 1.6
90 0.15 98 4.8
170 0.30 §9 4.6
50 2.50 491 0.4
50 2.10 204 2.1
90 0.15 89 4.8
160 0.35 47 4.6
55 2.60 624 1.6
50 1.90 247 2.4
75 0.24 81 4.2
180 0.22 60 5 4
55 2.60 552 1.5
50 1.75 266 2.6
110 0.13 103 5.0
190 0.21 39 5.6
H/A
— M. — —
MM — •— _ _
— — — — .
M-. _.. — _ _.
... — -» — _ _»—
MM _«. — _ _-,
— — — —
: _ _ ___ __
— _ ~ — —
•— — -— ~
— _ _~ __ _ _
— __ ___ __
_« _ - -
— — — —
- RT
170
200
170
220
180
200
140
30
30
150
140
30
20
- RT
30
40
45
110
25
35
95
25
40
60
20
35
25
35
_»
— -
—
__
—
—
—
_
- RT
55
40
40
30
50
40
30
20
60
50
1
50
40
.e
AFTER CONV ~
7.00 430 0.1
3.80 51 1 0.1
3.40 108 0.2
4.20 50 0.0
6.80 307 0.2
4.60 409 0.2
2.60 121 0.0
4.80 53 0.1
3.80 1045 0.1
0.20 746 0.2
0.05 327 1.4
0.05 116 0.3
4.80 846 0.1
0.80 995 0.1
0.05 245 0.4
0.05 80 0.1
AFTER CONV
0.05 2115 1.2
0.20 2140 0.3
0.04 161 3.9
0.03 111 3.2
0.032588 1.1
0.70 2015 0.2
0.03 685 3-4
0.03 141 3.1
0.05 2314 1.5
0.35 2165 0.3
0.05 368 3.1
0.05 93 1.4
0.052787 1.5
0.90 2438 0.2
0.05 501 2.7
0.05 106 1.4
— H/A
~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~
— — —
__
— — —
_ — _
— — —
— — —
.„__ fyajtf
2!^ 5-3 0.2
2.10 224 0.3
0.05 101 2.2
0.05 93 1.8
2.50 409 0.4
2.40 154 0.2
0.05 94 2.1
0.05 61 1.5
2.90 624 0.2
2.50 212 0.1
0.03 81 2.8
0 04 77 3-0
2.60 583 0.1
2.00 196 0.1
0.02 123 3.5
0.02 53 3.4
- T.P. COMPOSITE -
180 1.65 1318 0.6
140
-,*.
90
150
110
__„,
70
105
80
TlO
95
70
-MH
160
0.40 583 1.0
MM — 11.111- MM
0.20 77 1.5
1.90 1493 0.6
0.40 593 1-0
«.„ •mi.ji M—
0.25 83 1.7
0.60 1518 3-4
0.15 399 4.2
5Tl8 ~66 476
0.48 1542 3.6
0.15 430 4.3
-._ •-•• M-.
0,18 79 4-8
HC
—
—
—
—
___
__
—
—
_,_
_,_
MM
— _
M_
__
.
_w
E
— -
™—
LEFT EXHAUST SYSTEM - —
00 NOX 02 HC CO NOX
N/A
MM
— —
—
..
^^ ___
_ _____
— —
— — ,J,
— - MMM
N/A -
__. -T^_
MM — -_
_-__
— ._
— T-C_
— -—
_M ^^n_.
E E
~ ~
M— -I"
—
_
—
,—
—
WM
MM
E
«~
MM
—
—
—
—
-M
.....-,
—
~
—
— LEFT EXHAUST —
120
110
215
250
110
100
140
210
95
115
240
-_^
MM
MM
_f^j
MM
*._
__
—
MM
M_
—
— M
__
—
__
^^m
MM
—
MM
2.90 716
1.10 624
0.15 169
0.60 51
2.60 839
1.05 747
0.15 181
1 .00 57
4.00 614
1.65 675
0.95 186
2.20 52
3.80 655
1.70 747
1 .25 181
2.35 56
H/A
_ —MM
— — _
— ^ — —
M* — _
M* —
.
__. — —
—
_.
,,,, H/A
_»
MM — _
—
MM
_ -*_-_
__. _____
—
_M
—
__. — _
— M —
-«.
— M -* — —
0.2
1.8
4.7
3.7
0.2
1.5
4.2
3-5
1.5
2.1
2'.2
3.2
2.7
__
«—
»—
~~
—
—
—
—
—
—
__
—
_—
—
—
—
•_
—
__
—
__
__
—
__
—
—
—
__
—
._
—
_ i
E
___
— .
^~.
w.
-_-
—
-«.
—
___
E
—
*~™
u /•
— —
-
_
— —
— — ___
E E
— - N/A
— — •-.
— —„„-,
— — «,-
— —
MM _,_
— —
.
_J|||;_
E E
~ ~
__ —
02
—
—
__.
___
—
___
E
___
._
__
__
__
—
—
—
__
E
—
•*•
- LFT AFTER CONV -
110
45
50
50
95
50
35
40
120
105
100
255
90
110
170
260
__.
— M
MM
MM
MM
__.
—
— .
_
_
_
«
__.
M-.
.
— .
—
—
_..
^_.
—.
M*
2.90 726
0.50 358
0.05 186
0.04 65
3.20 747
0.20 348
0.05 199
0.05 58
6.80 337
1.70 716
0.60 96
1 .90 4o
4.40 614
1.80 737
1 .20 108
2.90 42
-•-- N/A
— _»_
__ _»_
__ -
« __
— - —
— —
— _
__ —
__
__ —
— __
__ ___
— —
— —
— ___
__ •
— —
— —
— —
__ ^^~
__ »_
— —
__ _«_
— —
0.1
0.3
2.1
1.1
0.1
0.1
1.6
0.7
0.1
0.2
0.6
0.5
0.1
0.2
0.6
0.6
—
—
—
~~
—
—
—
—
—
—
~
—
—
__
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
THREE MODE TEST EMISSION RESULTS ARE: HC - PPM/HEX, CO - J, UNCORRECTED NOX - PPM
N-25
-------
APPENDIX N.CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST EMISSION RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
VEH
NO. YEAR
H.P. —
30MPH 50MPH
DENVER
RIGHT EXHAUST SYSTEM
NOX 02 HC CO
LEFT EXHAUST SISTB1
326 1975
MAKE MODL CID
(12) (26)
50 MPH
MPH
D
IDLE (N
50
30
IDLE (D
IDLE (N
CAPR GHIA 171
BEFORE MICE
EXHAUST -
.00 460 0.6
.60
.00
.00
.20
.80
— LEFT EXHAUST —
190 5.50 WO 0.9
8.90 154 1.0
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
MPH
MPH
(D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
COLT SEDA 98
BEFORE MTCE
( 9) (21)
50 MPH
IDLE (D}
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
DATS 710 119
BEFORE MTCE
— LEFT EXHAUST
140 2.45 1
110 2.00
1.20 44
2.35 1418
1.85 604
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
1.50 1144
1.50 522
DATS B210 85
MTCE
2.20 1617 3.0
1.00 685 4.1
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
D
IDLE N
50 MPH
30 »H
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
0.80 52
2.40 2090
1.25 655
MPR
(D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
327 1975
328 1975
DATS SEDA 11
BEFORE
REPLICATE
AFTER MICE
REPLICATE
FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST EMISSION RESULTS ARE: HC - PPM/HEX, CO - %, UNCORHECTED NOX - PPM
H-26
-------
APPENDIX N.CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST EMISSION RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
J YEAR MAKE
"M 1975 FIAT
330 1975 FIAT
MI lore unim
H" lytj n(M]}
332 1975 HAZD
® 1975 MAZD
MODL CID
STAW 78
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
X1-9 79
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
ever 01
\*1\t\t y 1
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
MQ 7f»
3 f U
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
RX3 70
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
30MPH 50MPH
( 9) (21)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
LMPH
MPH
(D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
§0 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
( 9) (21)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
TDitB CD)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
( 9) (21)
50 MPH
JDLB CD)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
. . ,-,\
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
"fp^Bj (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (N)
( 9) (21)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (DJ
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
39 "P?
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
————— nxuni uuiw
HC CO NOX 02
- RIGHT EXHAUST -
75 2.10 1592 2.8
90 3.00 655 2.1
.— — -,___ __
2000 9.60 27 8.5
80 2.10 1617 3.2
70 2.50 839 2.9
2000 9.30 26 Til
20 1.15 798 1.1
25 0.55 207 1.6
?0 0.50 10 1.2
0 1.50 716 1.0
35 2.20 138 0.3
__ » — .— ••
2000 9.80 11 1.1
- RIGHT EXHAUST -
170 6.10 796 2.5
80 3-10 816 3-5
-» •. _i _
115 2.00 10 1.5
165 6.30 307 2.5
80 2.60 819 3.1
» _T. • .. ••
100 1.80 12 1.6
115 1.80 1269 2.7
150 3.80 921 2.5
— — «. ... ..
110 2.00 51 1.5
130 1.10 1113 2.6
75 2.10 890 3.6
— — «. ... ..
90 1.70 57 1.6
N/A
_ __ _
__ __ — « «_
_ _ _
_ __ -!-• _
— — —
« _,_ ... __
._ _ —— ._
._ _ - _
__ .. --- _
_ — —
_ _J» — • __
__ — T-^ _
HT/*ITP i?vn Arrant
~ RIGHT EXHAUST —
0 0.05 307 1.8
0 0.05 80 1.7
._ i_. «... _
0 0.02 29 5.6
10 0.10 307 2.2
0 0.05 75 2.0
_. _,. -r.-n _
0 0.02 28 5.1
10 0.25 169 2.1
20 0.05 88 3.1
250 0.50 28 7.8
25 0.20 207 2.1
15 0.05 90 3.3
300 0.90 21 7.9
- RIGHT EXHAUST -
10 0.20 130 2.6
10 0.05 113 1.7
"To oTio ~~ii iTi
10 0.10 170 2.8
10 0.15 108 1.0
"To o7o5 ~~28 T.I
10 0.08 109 3.1
10 0.05 108 3.6
.. .M- IM-IMIM _
10 0.05 27 2.1
5 0.06 150 3.3
5 0.06 106 3.5
» — • •— _
10 0.05 26 2.3
UO1 Oli
HC
_»
«
__
_
~—
_
...
_
—
- RT
150
30
fT-,1
ll
30
^ — r
25
110
70
100
30
„
25
_
—
*~
—
_
—
llr
_
_
_
—
_.-,
•—
_,M
__
.—
_
— ..
—
_r_
—
—
—
—
—
_
_-
_
—
__
E
_
—
ainn — —
CO NOX
N/A —
— ...
« — .—
— ...
— —
..
_ __
_ —
__ ...
_ —
_ — ,-
— ...
_ .—
— —
AFTER COmi
6.70 816
0.30 796
_ --.
0.08 62
5.90 880
0.30 900
^^ — ^^
0.06 73
5.30 1070
1.10 726
.. ...
0 . 07 73
4.30 746
0.25 993
.. -- ..
0.05 83
... H/ft
_ _
_ --—
_ —
_ -••
— —
t __M
_ ..•
.. _L._.
_ „_
_
.. _^n__m
_ —
H/*
...
.. n.»-
_ ...
_ ...
_
.. ---
—
— __.
—
—
—
U/A
— — -
« _.
___
_ ___
~ • ...
—
« ___
02
"__
__
__
„
*_
_
__
_
..
__
—
r _ ^
1.2
2.1
_
1.1
1.1
2.2
— ._
3.3
1.1
1.1
-,—
?'2
2il
_,-
1.0
HC
_"
_
^ _
__
_
_
__
_ _
__
—
—
-„-_
—
^—
—
__
—
_
—
__
—
— — — L.tr i
CO NOX
N/A —
__ --
— ^ _^_
__ --,
.. --
— -
—
— ___--
__ ...
_ ..
_ -j-i-
— -_
_
N/A —
_ _i_—
_ ._.—
^— m m^_
— —
^— — _ ^_
_
— _ -- -.
.
.. __ —
__ —
CAHAU
02
__
_
__
__
_
—
__
__
_^
_
—
^^
—
—
_„
—
— mi
—
_
__
—
—
__
—
I PET IPYWAfl^T
— 100 1.10 2986
-,-r-
—
.^
—
_„
_
..
..
_
—
_—
— -
_
-^
.*
_^
—
__-
—
—
—
—
~
_
^.
—
_
—
•M.
—
120
_
265
90
135
260
M_
—
..
_
.-
— „
—
__
_
_
..
—
_
__
—
—
— ^
—
_
_-
_
—
— —
—
0.90 1211
.. 11 -i
1.90 118
1.20 2986
1.55 1211
.. M_l_-
1.90 131
_ .. ^
.. __^-
«. U.J. -
.— ..r-
—
_ ._r-
— — —
U/A
._ __j-
— ...-
— _—
—
_ -r-n-M-
— —
_ __^-
_ —
— —
— —
— — —
— — ...
— —
_ .-..-
_ _
.. .—
— —
.. ...
— —
0.9
0.7
_
0.3
0.5
0.5
..
0.1
__
..
_
_
__
__
—
..
__
„
_
..
_
—
—
—
__
—
-
—
—
—
E
—
—
isi sisim
HC CO NOX
~_ _ N/A_
_ -._- «^_
_ _ —-in
_ .
_L_ __. ._
i -r^ _,-
— — '
— — .. ---
— , J_t_
— . --- — - -
— _
_ _ ...
— --- ___
_ _
N/A —
_ -- .
— —
— — __
_ _
_ _
__ _ __
— —
— —
— _ __ _ _ -
— —
U/A
—
_ _ LI._.J
**** ~~ ~ ™" *
.. -- --,_
_ _
__ ___
— — ...
_ — — -.—
— _ —
...
_ __ —- .
N/A ---
.. — —
— .. -— —
_ _ —
— _ —
— — ——
— — — — -
— — —
— _ —
— — —
z z in
— _ —
_ __ — —
Z _ —
_ — —
— — —
_ ... — .
_ _ —
_ _ - • -
— — — —
02
^—
^
—
__
..
^t—
__
__
__
—
—
__^
—
__
—
_
_ _
—
—
__
—
_
__
_
^^
..
—
..
..
_
«
_
_
..
__
—
..
__
—
—
_.
—
—
—
Z
—
~~
— —
—
—
-.
..
—
~~
™~
MODE TEST EMISSION RESULTS ARE: HC - PPM/HEX, CO - %, UNCORRECTED NOX - PPM
M-27
-------
APPENDIX N.CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST EMISSION RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
VEH
NO. YEAR MAKE MODL CID
H.P. —
DENVER
RIGHT EXHAUST SYSTEM
LEFT EXHAUST
30MPH 50MPH HC CO NOX 02 HC CO NOX 02 HC CO NOX 02 HC CO
335 1975 M3 MSB 110
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
336 1975 OPEL STAW 116
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MICE
REPLICATE
1975
911S 164
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER KTCE
REPLICATE
340 1975 TOYO CELI 1
BEFORE
REPLICATE
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
( 9) (21)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
MPH
IDLE
(12) (26)
50 MPH
IDLE (N
N/A
- RIGHT
110
140
135
110
110
130
1TO
85
110
110
'8
40
EXHAUST -
2.40 2190 0.6
3.10 563
3.50 103
2.80 77
2.40 2115
J.10
h
0.80
2.10
2.60
1.10
0.55
61
123
78
N/A
N/A
.
0.3
0.4
0.4
0.8
0.3
0.4
0.4
0.6
0.4
0.9
0.8
0.6
0.4
1.0
0.9
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
— LEFT
— LEFT __
50 1.20
80 1.20
~70 2^10
50 1.20
BO 1.20
2.20 71
o!ao
— 70 1.05 92
1.10
N/A
N/A ~
N/A
AFTER MICE
REPLICATE
341 1975 TOYO CORO 97
BEFORE MICE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
( 9) (21)
50
1300 0 95
40 0.25
95 1.60
136 10.6
2886 5.0
1244 5.2
— — — _ — — — — 1080 1.30 111
N/A
N/A
tare
190 1.6
— 10
— — — 20
N/A
1-7 H - -~ "
32
FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST EMISSION RESULTS ARE: HC - PPM/HEX, CO - J, UNCORRECTED NOX - PPM
U-28
-------
APPENDIX N.CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST HUSSION RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
lEUt HAKE MODL CID
H.P. —
30MPH 50MPH
HC CO
RIGHT
NOX 02
HC CO NOX 02 HC CO
LEFT
NOX
02
HC CO NOX 02
VOLK SEDA 97
BEFORE ""•
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
3*5 1975 VOLV SEDA 121
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MICE
REPLICATE
5" 1975 FORD GRAN 200
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
512
MDNA 250
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
HBPLICATB
( 9) (21)
50 MPH
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE CD)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (N)
( 9) (21)
50 MPH
30
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
MPH
(D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
MPH
IDLE (N)
(12) (26)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
MPH
(D)
IDLE 00
(12) (26)
0 MPH
0
IDLE (N
MPH
MPH
- RIGHT EXHAUST -
150 1.10 2015 1.
190 0.45 70
N/A
1.5 — —
250
120
150
2.70 71 0.7
0.90 1617 1.4
-
g
- RT AFTER CONV
' 5.10 849
2.30 645
110 2.80 37
155 4.90 1020
155 3.10 583
80 2.60 43 4.4 — —
230 7.40 430 2.8 — —
250 7.20 136 3.8 — —
240
220
300
250
- RIGHT EXHAUST -
130 3.60 737 4.2
100 2.80 327 4.8
80 2.80 4
50
700
300
840
7.80
8.50
409
111
4.9
3.6
2000 10.00
- RT
120
CONV —
80 696 4.0
- RIGHT EXHAUST -
2.40 232 5.5
3.20 62 5-5
RT AFTER CONV —
1.50 186 3.4
2.90 33 3.3
N/A
N/A
N/A
WSSION RESULTS ARE: HC - PPM/HEX, CO - %, UNCORRECTED NOX - PPM
N-29
-------
APPENDIX N.CONT'D
LISTING CP FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST EMISSION RESULTS
OK INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
VEH
NO. YEAR MAKE MODL CID
n P —
30MPH'50HPH
DENVER
RIGHT EXHAUST SYSTEM
HCCONOX02 HCOONOX02 HCOO
LEFT
NOX
EXHAUST SYSTEM
02 HC CO
NOX 02
513 1975 OLDS OMEG 250
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
1975 PLYM GRNF 400
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
515 1975 PONT VENT 250
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
516 1975 EMU SEQA 121
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
(12) (26)
50 MPH
- RIGHT EXHAUST -
517 1975 BMW
- RT AFTER
3-10
0.03
... 0.03
240 0.03
'" 3.10
0.02
0.02
0.03
2.0
182
MICE
REPLICATE
AFTER MICE
REPLICATE
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
IDLE
FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST EMISSION RESULTS ARE: BC - PPM/HEX, CO - %, ONCORRECTED NOX - PPM
N-30
-------
APPENDIX N.CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST EMISSION RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO. YEAR
518 1975
519 1975
520 1975
521 1975
522 1975
MAKE MODL CID
SUBA STAH 83
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
HERB 450S 276
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
PORS 914 120
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
SAAB 99LE 121
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
AMMO HORN 232
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
30MPH 50MPH
( 9) (21)
50 MPH
30 MPH
THT J? (T\}
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
(15) (3D
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
IDLE M
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
LMPH
MPH
(D)
IDLE (N)
( 9) (21)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
( 9) (21)
50 MPH
IDLE (N)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
(12) (26)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
an MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
IDLE (N)
HC
__
—
—
—
__
—
— —
__
—
__
—
__
—
—
—
—
—
—
_
—
__
__
— —
—
—
—
__
~~
— —
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
CO NOX
M/A
___
—
„ _^.,
__
-- -—
"
... _-
__ _ _ _.
—
__ ___
___
— —
Z ~
—
jj/A . _
—
—
__ — -
.. _—
z iz
— ___
__ ___
— _ —
__ —
__ —
__ ___
__ _
— —
__ ___
__ —
~™ — —
_ _••
«
—
— — -
02 HC CO NOX
__
—
—
~
__
— —
„
— ~
__
___
~~
—
—
__
—
—
—
__
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
__
~~*
—
—
—
—
—
__
—
__
- T
145
135
290
140
125
310
190
140
320
290
400
__
—
__
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
^ ._
—
—
—
z
—
—
__
__
--
— -
E
—
—
_
__
—
__
02
.P. COMPOSITE -
0.652065 4.2
1.90 583
1 .50 44
1.25 1841
1 .80 624
~.HO ~~46
2.60 45
1 .50 542
1.30 69
1 .60 93
1.60 450
1 .50 68
1J/A _
__ _-
__
~ ~
__
~ ZI
M— — — —
N/A , .
— —
—
—
__
__ ___
« _-»
— — -
_— ___
— — —
M/A _ _
__ —
__
—
_,_.-,
— - —
— —
_ —
U/A ___
__ ___
- ___
__
— - — —
b.1
6.5
4.0
4.9
676
4.1
4.9
3^4
4.8
?7l
__
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
~~
—
—
—
—
_
—
—
— —
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Z
__
~~
—
—
HC CO NOX 02 HC CO NOX 02
jj/^ ___
— — — —
__ __ — __
— — — —
__ __ ___ «
Z Z ZI Z
Z Z ZI Z
__ __ ™ ....
„ _ — __
I PPT PTfHAII^T -_
40 1.15 522 1.6
35 1.00 94 1.3
60 2.10 35 1.0
45 1-00 32 1.5
40 1.20 634 1.7
30 1.00 88 1.3
75 2.60 35 1.0
70 1.30 31 1.5
50 0.70 593 2.0
35 0.6o 90 1.4
40 0.90 37 1.6
25 0.35 36 1.9
45 0.70 542 2.3
40 0.70 93 1.7
45 1.00 36 1.9
30 0.40 35 2.4
LEFT EXHAUST -
40 0.30 952 4.0
40 0.15 358 5.9
60 0.65 82 3.1
40 0.30 .726 4.3
40 0.15 450 6.0
40 0.65 83 3-0
— — — __
— __ — _ —
__ — ___ __
— — — —
— — — —
__ — ___ _
N/A
— — —
— — —
— __ _-
— — —
— — — - —
__ __ — .
— — _
LEFT EXHAUST
110 1.20 2090 0.8
135 0.60 1119 1.0
255 2.50 196 0.7
225 2.40 78 0.6
115 1.20 2413 0.7
130 0.40 1269 1.0
275 3-00 266 0.6
230 2.60 96 0.5
95 2.30 1343 0.5
115 1.80 511 0.4
250 3.70 118 0.7
210 3.60 68 0.7
90 2.20 1244 0.4
110 1.70 563 0.4
245 3.80 118 0.7
210 4.00 68 0.6
—
—
—
z
— —
—
—
__
—
—
—
z
—
—
—
^^
—
—
—
—
— .
-•—
—
—
"^
- T.
l8
1?.8
180
2000
—
—
—
•"•
—
—
E
—
—
—
—
M/A
— —
__ __
-~ — - ,_
~ ™ —
— - ™ —
__ __ ...
— — __-. ...
.__,. "/A
— — __
__ ___ —
— —
Z ™ Z
— — —
__ — _
— " — ~
_ — „
H/A
~~ «— -—
— _
~ —
— —
— — —
Z ~ Z
— — —
— — - ~
—~ """*• ""^
P. COMPOSITE -
0.50 2588 2.g
0.50 1144 2.8
?7l5 ^2 6.5
0.50 2438 2.7
0.30 1518 3-0
1.00 95 7.1
— _
__ — __
__ ___ __
__ ___ __
___ —
- N/A
__ ___ __
__ ___ —
— — —
__ — —
Z — —
PEDBR*L THREE MODE TEST EMISSION RESULTS ARE: HC - PPM/HEX, CO - >, UNCORRECTED NOX - PPM
N-31
-------
APPENDIX N.CONT'D
LISTING GP FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST EMISSION RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
VEH
NO. YEAR MAKE MODL CID
DENVER
H.P. — RIGHT EXHAUST SYSTEM
30HPH 50MPH HC CO NOX 02 HC CO NOX 02
LEFT EXHAUST SYSTEM
HC CO NOX 02 HC CO NOX 02
523 1975 AMMD HORN 258
BEFORE MICE
REPLICATE
AFTER MICE
REPLICATE
524 1975 DODG MONA 440
BEFORE MICE
REPLICATE
AFTER MICE
REPLICATE
525 1975 MERC MARQ 460
BEFORE MICE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
534 1975 AMHD GREM 232
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
535 1976 AMMO HORN 232
BEFORE MICE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
(12) (26)
50 MPH
30
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
~ MPH
N/A —
N/A -
N/A
-3T.P. COMPOSITE -
"" Oifi
*« 1B? °-7
18 ill $ M
.50 0.80 655 0.7
1.60 1219
0.55 501
(15) (3D
50 MPH
IDLE (D
IDLE (N
50
- RIGHT
90 1.00
110 1.20
4.20
3.60
0 0.40
0.40
0.70
0.50
70 0.
90 0.50
- RIGHT EXHAUST -
40 0.50 1
40 1.10
2.50
40 o!60 1
- T.P. COMPOSITE -
0.181418 2.6
-LFT AFTER CONV -
20 0.05 1518 3.1
20 0.05 419 2.5
0.05 76 2.7
0.04 52 4.
0.05 141
£8 3
0.05 51
0.45
8:8
0.22 1
.20
.40
0.50
40 0.
45 0.
60 1.90
D
IDLE (N
50 MPH
30
IDLE (D
IDLE (N
0.80 11
0.29 15
— LEFT EXHAUST
2.40
190 1.10 1
140 0.35 1
110 0.
1.
o!
40 1642 0.
140 0.30 219 1-
105 0.25 90 1.
FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST EMISSION RESULTS ARE: HC - PPM/HEX, CO - %, UNCORRBCTED NOX - PPM
N-32
-------
APPENDIX N.OONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST EMISSION RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE" AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
VEH
NO. YEAR
536 1975
538 1975
sun IQTC
(.I,.. «ftf»K
19/5
517 1975
MAKE MODL CID
AMMO PACE 258
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
AMMO HORN 232
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
AKMTI PAPE ?£ft
ninu cnvu csyj
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
WITT* r IpQJk 3CA
DU.LU UsoA yyj
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
BUIC REGA 350
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
— H P
30MPH 50MPH
(12) (26)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
(12) (26)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D )
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
t.n\ tff.\
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 K?H
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
HC
_- —
_..
__
—
_M
__
—
—
_—
__
__
__
_,»
__
—
__
...
__
_..
__
—
»«.
—
__
_
_v
„
—
__
—
_ _
~
__
_-
—
^^
~
__
__
—
i RTom
CO NOX
N/A —
__
— _ —
— —
.» -
— —
—
—
__ - ^
— —
— __
—
H/A -
— __
— —
__
__ —
.». — — _
__ —
__ » *
__ _
__
* M/A _
E E
__ _-_
— _ — .
— — —
—
__ --._
— —
—
w
—
DENVER
1 EXHAUST SY
02 HC
—
—
__
_
__
—
_ —
__
__
—
—
__
—
—
__
»
—
__
—
__
__
—
__
—
__
»
__
_
__
—
—
— _
—
OC \ f 0 1 \ DTVOT* I7VU AI IO*i*
j) Oi/ — llLtinT bUlAUhf
50 MPH 5 0.65 368
30 MPH
IDLE CD)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
(15) (3D
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
IDLE (N)
50 MPR
IDLE W
50 MPH
30 M>H
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
80
110
110
30
90
115
175
15
50
90
50
50
90
70
2.20 161
3-3° 36
1.00 150
2.60 156
2.70 56
3.60 38
0.70 399
1.50 171
0.35 77
0.35 37
11 A 3Cm
.10 399
2.20 151
0.55 80
0.15 12
6~8
H
8:3
6.8
fi
5.2
I-1
6.9
6i2
6.8
6.8
- RIGHT EXHAUST -
55 3-60 532 1.3
95 2.10 327 2.2
60
100
170
170
15
90
90
60
85
1
1.70 96
5.10 58
3.80 573
2.80 307
5.30 87
6.10 57
1.10 1020
1.30 110
0.12 307
0.15 62
1.50 931
2.20 358
0.15 317
0.27 66
2.6
u
2.3
2.7
2.5
3-8
3.9
5.0
1.9
ll5
„
__
__
__
_
—
__
r
__
__
™
__
»_
__
__
__
__
.._
—
— .
__
__
__
—
—
—
_,,
—
—
—
—
—
lr_
E
_
v«
—
DT
•" n*
5
90
160
200
100
170
205
15
90
20
lin
HU
80
20
- RT
60
105
200
17J
110
210
185
15
60
1
90
20
20
^TFM . -
OlDn — — a —
CO NOX 02
(j/A
__ __
_« ___
— ___
_. «_ «
— —
—
__ _» __
__ ___ __
._
— __
__
_ _ —
—
* N/A
__
—
— ___
— _
— _«— «
—
_ — _ __
— — __
— «_ —
—
— — —
— ~ _ _
— —
H/ft
E E E
__ —_ —
„ ___ __
— ___ __
— —
— JM_ __
E E E
__ — —
— .—« —
— — . —
&I7*PI7D rnuu
0.90 511 0.3
2.90 207 0.0
1.00 31 0.2
1.80 21 0.2
1.50 655 0.1
3.90 166 0.1
1.10 36 0.2
5.10 21 0.2
0.05 511 0.5
2.30 2J2 0.1
0.05 138 1.0
0 05 60 0 7
Inn ii&n n o
.UU **DU U.C
3.00 191 0.1
0.50 138 0.6
0.05 12 0.2
mmvt Mnftnr
AFTER COHV — •
3.80 593 0.1
2.70 28b 0.1
5.50 51 0.3
6.10 36 0.2
3.90 593 0.2
3.10 286 0.1
6.50 51 0.3
6.80 37 0.2
1.90 970 0.1
1.50 389 0.1
0.02 358 1.1
0.02 81 1.3
2.20 911 0.1
2.80 307 0.0
0.02 368 1.2
0.02 87 1.1
f ripm pVUlkli
HC CO NOX 02
— LEFT EXHAUST —
50 2.30 962 0.2
100 3.50 286 0.1
180 6.20 81 0.1
170 6.10 62 0.3
80 3.20 757 0.2
150 1.20 227 0.1
200 6.60 80 0.3
180 6.10 60 0.3
65 1.15 982 0.1
135 3.20 286 0.2
120 0.82 181 0.7
100 0.68 106 0.8
70 2.20 816 0.3
160 3.60 266 0.2
130 6.80 191 0.7
120 1.10 106 0.7
___ RyU«l|CT-
10 1.30 1095 1.1
60 0.20 970 5.7
25 1.10 10 3.7
35 1.20 1020 1.2
70 0.20 911 5.7
— — — ™ __
30 1.50 12 3-7
20 1.10 611 2.9
60 0.50 593 5.2
__ __ _«__ _
50 0.70 16 8.3
30 1.00 631 2.8
50 0.10 573 1.9
50 5T50 ~6 i7l
LEFT EXHAUST
60 0.70 1291 0.8
100 1.10 552 0-3
130 3-20 237 0.6
150 3.00 101 0.1
50 0.80 1692 0.7
90 1.50 611 0.2
120 3.50 255 0.6
110 3.20 108 0.1
35 3.80 563 0.2
55 1.00 307 0.1
90 1.70 296 0.6
95 2.60 113 1.0
35 3.90 1518 0.2
55 5.10 318 0.2
85 1.25 337 0.7
100 2.15 119 1.0
N/A -
— — ._ — »— _T
— — ~
__ —
— ~ "*— "•""' " *
— — —
-_« —
U/A
_ —
_ _ _
_. —
— — —
__ —
— — ——
' — — —
__ _ _
— — —
1ST SI
HC
_ ,
__
__ f
„
—
__
_
__
__
— .
__
__
_^
__
__
__
„»
—
„
—
__
__
—
—
__
__
~
__
~ ^
__
__
—
—
—
—
— ~
~
—
~
—
—
-_
—
^^
—
--
'QTCU
CO NOX
N/A —
— —
— —
— —
— — —
— ,,.__
— - --
__
— mi, --
. »—
— _ ,.„„
— I...I--
— —
—
u /«
— —
— III.--
— — —
„__
— _
— V
_
— _ Ml--
— _
__ ^^^
— _ _ —
~ ~
_„
.
____ M/A __
E E
— —
— , —
— —
— —
— ___
— —
— —
__ mi.—
— —
H/A __ .
"™"~ ™ ri~r
— — -
—
"•* **"""
— •*—
—
i— ^. _,,-.-.
-m. H/A
— —
— —
~™ — —
— —
_ —
— — —
_
_ —
_ —
02
—
»—
«
_____
—
«
—
—
____
_____
— «.
—
__
—
—
—
—
__
—
— »
—
_
_—
—
—
— «.
—
— -
—
_.
WdW
—
_—
_
—
_«.
—
__
_•
—
—
—
—
__
—
—
__
—
— '
—
»
—
—
_>
—
—
PBDBRAL THREE MODE TEST EMISSION RESULTS ARE: HC - PPM/HEX, CO - %, UNCORRECTED NOX - PPM
H-33
-------
APPENDIX N.CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST EMISSION RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
VEH
NO. YEAR MAKE MODL CID
H.P. ~
30MPH 50MPH
HC CO
DENVER
RIGHT EXHAUST SYSTEM
NOX 02 HC CO NOX
02
LEFT EXHAUST SYSTEM __
HC CO NOX 02 HC CO NOX 02
549 1975 BUIC LESA 350
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MICE
REPLICATE
550 1975 BUIC LESA 350
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
551 1975 BUIC LESA 455
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
553 1975 BUIC RIVI 455
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
554 1975 BUIC STAW 155
BEFORE MICE
REPLICATE
AFTER MICE
REPLICATE
(15) (3D
50 MPH
- RIGHT EXHAUST -
IDLE
50
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
(15) (3D
50 MPH
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
(18) (36)
(18) (36)
50 —
0.80 1
1.10 1;
2.60
2.20 ..
1.50 839
1.20 1244
2.00 138
2.00 45
111
40
40 0.90 583 5.6
50 1.05 21? 5-3
O
110 0.30
4*0 8:*
N/A
N/A --
.1
- RT AFTER CONV —
50 2.30
110 4.20
225 6.90
28 _:°°
511 0.4
0.3
120
100
- RIGHT EXHAUST -
110 1.60 1070 0.8
190 2.30 234 0.8
260 4.50 44 ;.~
220 3.90 34 0.
120 1.50 10
- RT AFTER CONV —
1.30 1045 0.4
2.20 ""
4.1P
N/A —
N/A —
N/A —
N/A
N/A
N/A —
— LEFT
COHV-
— _ — ___ — __ 50 1.30 715 6.5
— — — — — — — — 110 2.50 214 6.7
— „ — _ _ _ — __ igg 4.50 40 6.4
— 1
— 1
___ __ -L __ ___ _ ™Q
FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST EMISSION RESULTS ARE: HC - PPM/HEX, CO - %, UNCORRECTED NOX - PPM
H-34
-------
APPENDIX N.CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL THHEE MODE TEST EMISSION RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
van
NO.
ccg
jjy
cgn
JW
"5fi
-------
APPENDIX N.CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL THREE NODE TEST EMISSION RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
VEH H.P. —
NO. YEAR MAKE MODL CID 30MPH 50MPH
DENVER
RIGHT EXHAUST SYSTEM
HC CO NOX 02 HC CO NOX 02
LEFT EXHAUST SYSTEM
HC CO NOX 02 HC CO NOX 02
569 1975 CHEV VEGA 140
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MICE
REPLICATE
N/A
N/A
IDLE
570 1975 CHEV MONZ 140 (12) (26)
BEFORE MTCB 50 MPH
36 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
REPLICATE 50 MPH
N/A
N/A
AFTER HTCE 50 MPH — — — — — —
REPLICATE
571 1975 CHEV VEGA 140
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
N/A
U/A
IDLE
MPH — — — — —
IDLE (N)
AFTER MTCB 50 MPH
REPLICATE
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
IDLE (N) — — — — —
580 1975 CHEV NOVA 350 (12) (26)
BEFORE MTCE 50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
REPLICATE 50 MPH
AFTER MTCB
REPLICATE
- RIGHT EXHAUST - - RT AFTER CONV —
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
80 1.60 726 2.0
100 1.10 286 2.7
95 0.15 196 4.1
150 0.25 51 4.
50 2.30 737 1.
70 1.05 286 2.
1.40 79
0.80 16
0.05 202
0.04 68
M"
O.S
0.3
0.3
ll7
0.2
0.1
581 1975 CHEV NOVA 350 (15) (3D
BEFORE MICE 50 MPH
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCB 50 MPH
REPLICATE
- RT AFTER
65 1.40 11
75 1.10
240 7.20
240 7.40
90 2.30
2.20
— LEFT EXHAUST „
50 1.201493 2.8
70 0.28
310
310 .
1.30 141
0.50
7.7Q
LFT AFTER CONV -
0 0.55 1045 0.2
0.02
9.10 1
8.10 1
0.90 104
0.30
9.40 11
.40 16
- LFT AFTER
420 6.00
430 4.40 450
N/A
N/A
FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST EMISSION RESULTS ARE: HC - PPM/HEX, CO - %, UNCORRBCTBD NCK - PPM
H-36
-------
APPENDIX N.CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST EMISSION RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
VEH
NO. YEAR MAKE MODL CID
H.P. ~
30MPH 50MPH
DENVER
RIGHT EXHAUST SYSTEM
LEFT EXHAUST SYSTEM
HC CO NQX 02 HC CO NOX 02 HC CO NOX 02 HC CO NOX 02
582 1975 CHEV NOVA 350
BEFORE MICE
REPLICATE
AFTER MICE
REPLICATE
583 1975 CHEV NOVA 350
BEFORE MICE
REPLICATE
AFTER MICE
REPLICATE
588 1975 CHEV MONT 350
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
589 1975 CHEV MALI 350
BEFORE MICE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
591 1975 CHEV MDNT 350
(50°
MPH
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
(12) (26)
~ MPH
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 ,
IDLE (D
IDLE (N
IDLE
BEFORE'MTCE 50 MPH
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
- RIGHT EXHAUST -
100 2.45 778 6.1
6.2
.- ._ 5.
125 1.60 52 5.
110 3.70 614 ~
125 1.00 286
2.15 212
115 1.
180 1.
- RT AFTER CONV —
120 3.80 1045 0.1
.35 450 0.1
145 2.30
N/A
- RIGHT
215 4.6
240 3.4
400 5.00
220 S.'OO
250 4.00
604 0.
286 1.
232 2.
71 2.
450 0.
237 1.
227 2.
72 2.6
- RT AFTER CONV
210 4.80 675 0.2
250 ' ' —
400
- RT AFTER CONV —
10 0.05 798 0.3
N/A
0 — —
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
110 0.90 22 0.1 — — — — __ — —
- RIGHT EXHAUST - - RT AFTER CONV —_
N/A
N/A
FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST EMISSION RESULTS ARE: HC - PPM/HEX, CO - %, UNCORHECTfiD NOX - PPM
N-37
-------
APPENDIX N.CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST EMISSION RESULTS
W INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
VEH
NO. YEAR
MAKE MODL CD)
H.P. —
3GMPH 50MPH
DENVER
RIGHT EXHAUST SYSTEM
LEFT EXHAUST SYSTEM
HC CO NOX 02 HC CO NQX 02 HC CO NOX 02 HC CO NOX 02
592 1975
593 1975
591 1975
595 1975
596 1975
CHEV MONT 350
BEFORE MICE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
CHEV MALI 350
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
CHEV MONT 350
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
CHEV MALI 350
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCB
REPLICATE
CHEV STAW 350
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
(15) (3D
50 MPH
IDLE (D
IDLE ....
50 MPH
(15) (3D
~- MPH
- HT AFTER CONV —
-RIGHT. EXHAUST -
- RT AFTER CONV
60 2.80 716 0.2
- RIGHT EXHAUST -
§0 0.50 1045 1.1
- RT AFTER CONV
20 0.0
5Q- 1.6
l'.20
0.10
2.40
-.RIGHT EXHAUST -
- RT AFTER CONV
55 1.60
19*0 1
0 0.92 30
1.90 696
2J»5 131
1.25
85 2.30 W9 0.
115 1.40
200 1.
150 1.
95 1.
125 2.
200 1.
150 1.85
75 2.60 655 0.
180 2.30 737 0.
220 1.00 358 1.
180 1 10 106 2.
3.30 665 0.
IDLE
50 MPH
30
IDLE CD
IDLE (N
3.70 522 0.
240 0.70 3
- RT AFTER CONV
0.1
0
0.03
0.02 191
0.90 1742
0.20
0.02 675
0.02 202
N/A
N/A
N/A —
N/A
N/A —
N/A —
N/A —
N/A
N/A
N/A
IDLE (N)
FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST EMISSION RESULTS ARE: HC - PPM/HEX, CO - %, DNCORRECTED NQX - PPM
N-38
-------
APPENDIX N.CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST EMISSION RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
VEH
NO. YEAR MAKE MODL CID
— H.P. —
30MPH 50MPH
HC CO
DENVER
RIGHT EXHAUST SYSTEM
NOX 02 HC CO NOX
02
598 1975 CHEV NOVA 350
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
599 1975 CHEV MONT 350
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
600 1975 CHEV MALI 350
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
608 1975 CHEV CAPR 451
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MICE
REPLICATE
609 1975 CHHY CORD 360
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
(12) (26)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
39
- RIGHT
130 3.50
285 1.00
IDLE (N
(15) (3D
50 MPH
PH
3.80
4.20
1.00
0.90
5.00
4.40
1.40
1.50
176 0.
61
1.
- RIGHT EXHAUST -
50 MPH
MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
MPH
30 MPH
(D)
IDLE (N)
LMPH
MPH
(D)
IDLE (N)
IDLE
IDLE
(15) (3D
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE iN)
AFTER MICE 50 MPH
REPLICATE
- RT AFTER CONV —
25 0.05 18Q1 1.
25 0.04 1244 1.
" 3.10
2.00
0.05 18
0.02
2.00
2.10
20 0.70
40 0.80
160
140
170 2.30
160 1.80
- RIGHT EXHAUST -
0 1.00 1118 0.7
1:3
8:H
1.
i!io
1.10
1.10
i!8o
150
150
- RT AFTER CONV ~
80
110
1.15
1.13
170 0.11
310 0.19
80 1.60
110
170
97
34
150 0.18
ilsT31
2000
1600
1900
1.90
0.11
P
60
70
70
I
?:§8
1.20
0 65
2.80
0.25
1.25
0.70
880 2.4
450 3.1
34 1.7
26 50
880 2.2
511 1.2
15
25
1
15
1.10
0.10
0.05
0 03
1.00
0.06
0.01
0.03
15
890
562
12
!i
1.5
3.9
3:1
RT AFTER CONV —
941 0.2
0.1
30 0.90
20 0.60
30 0.90
30 1.00
25 0.90
40 1.00
30 1.10
HC CO NOX 02 HC CO NOX 02
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A —
N/A —
N/A —
FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST EMISSION RESULTS ARE: HC - PPM/HEX, CO - %, UNCORRECTED NOX - PPM
H-39
-------
APPENDIX N.CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST EMISSION RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
VEH
NO. YEAR MAKE MODL CH>
H.P. —
30MPH 50MPH
DENVER
RIGHT EXHAUST SYSTEM
HC CO NOX 02 HC CO NOX 02
LEFT EXHAUST SYSTEM .
HC CO NOX 02 HC CO NOX 02
610 1975 CHRY CORD 360
BEFORE MICE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
611 1975 CHRY NEHP 400
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
613 1975 CHRY
(15) (3D
50 MPH
30
[OLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
- RIGHT EXHAUST - - RT AFTER CONV —
110 1.00
N/A
NEHP 400
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
615 1975 CHRY NEHY 440
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
616 1975 DODG DART 225
BEFORE MICE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
120
105
175
150
110
115
200
175
- RIGHT
140 4.40
2
- RT AFTER
140 4.40
230 4.20
1160 10.00
1550 10.00
140 4.20
4.40
10.00
1420 10.00
10.00
5.20
4.30
10.00
10.00
- RT AFTER CONV
2.50
2.20
0.40
0.40
2.20
2.00
- LFT AFTER CONV -
120 2.00 Igj 0.1
(12) (26)
50 MPH
_ LEFT
110 1.40 1
.90
1.70 121
3.00 47
4.00
4.90
FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST EMISSION RESULTS ARE: HC - PPM/HEX, CO - %, UNCORRECTED NOX - PPM
H-40
-------
APPENDIX N.CONT'D
LISTING OP FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST EMISSION RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
ICttl
NO.
618
620
621
622
623
YEAR MAKE MODL CID
1975 DODG DART 318
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
1975 DODG CHAR 318
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MICE
REPLICATE
1975 DODG CHAR 360
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
1975 DODG CHAR 400
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MICE
REPLICATE
1975 DODG NONA 400
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
30MPH 50MPH
(12) (26)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
(15) (3D
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
(1C) 1-3-1)
\ 'JJ \ J 1 /
50 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
(15) (3D
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE fD)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
(15) (3D
50 MPH
faljg (0)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
fi)ifjg (0S
IDLE (N)
LMPH
MPH
(D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
IDLE (H)
— ..-...„ niutu uuuuoi oioicn — — —
HC CO NOX 02 HC CO NOX
— —
II ~ ~ ~
-- — — —
—
- RIGHT EXHAUST -
80 0.35 2090 1.2
130 0.50 2588 2.2
250 6.80 60 2.9
270 6.40 48 2.8
90 0.30 3583 1.2
145 0.§2 2090 2.4
250 6.60 70 2.9
250 6.60 50 2.9
70 0.42 1592 1.3
120 0.50 962 1.9
175 2.30 88 2.2
250 2.25 54 2.1
80 0.56 1742 0.9
150 0.90 1144 1.4
170 2.30 84 2.1
230 2.20 54 2.0
~ HTCtTT EQ1AQST •
130 4.00 1194 0.3
150 2.60 1941 0.4
220 5.20 66 0.4
200 5.40 55 0.2
140 4.00 1119 0.3
140 2.60 1592 0.3
215 5.60 64 0.3
190 5.60 55 0.3
130 4.30 706 5.5
130 2.20 1294 5.4
110 0.30 50 5.7
75 0.70 38 5.8
110 4.30 696 5.5
105 2.70 675 5.3
90 1.40 50 5.7
115 0.91 38 5.9
- RIGHT EXHAUST -
60 1.80 78T 0.4
120 3.20 450 0.1
240 4.00 54 0.2
270 4.00 42 0.2
70 1.50 675 0.3
120 2.00 491 0.1
200 3-70 50 0.2
250 3.10 38 0.2
85 3.60 266 0.2
140 4.80 113 0.1
125 2.10 60 0.6
120 2.20 64 0.6
100 4.40 232 0.3
140 5.40 113 0.1
140 3.60 66 0.4
150 1.90 44 0.4
- RIGHT EXHAUST -
100 3.80 491 0.2
105 3.00 276 0.2
800 10.00 22 0.7
820 10.00 19 0.9
105 4.40 389 0.3
120 4.40 207 0.2
1100 10.00 12 0.9
1260 10.00 14 1.2
90 3.60 430 0.2
90 3.00 225 0.2
130 2.40 75 0.4
130 2.70 52 0.3
90 3.60 409 0.2
§0 3.20 225 0.2
140 2.60 80 0.3
130 3.00 56 0.3
—
— •
—
—
— N/A —
_ _
— —
_ —
02
HC
CO NOX
C-AttflU
02
— — LEFT EXHAUST —
— 80 0.80 1791 0.6
— 140 1.00 1393 1.6
220 5.80 64 1.7
— 200 5.60 56 1.6
— 90 0.85 1617 0.7
— 150 1.10 1269 1.6
— 215 5.80 63 1.7
— 195 5.80 54 1.8
— 75 0.90 14?3 0.7
— 130 1.15 1045 1.3
—
—
~~
90
70
80
125
90
70
- RT AFTER CONV —
25 0.05 3782
30 0.07 238?
320 7.60 54
310 6.80 46
25 0.04 3782
50 0.24 450
300
f-70 58
5.90 48
15 0.04 1642
35 0.05 1194
90 1 .90 56
130 1.10 28
20 0.04 1791
30 0.05 665
90
155
- BT /
— n* i
120
150
200
200
125
150
190
1 .75 52
.15 28
iinvp rfaa
tf A&n \A4n«
.60 1070
.00 1393
.40 57
.00 51
.60 945
.00 1318
.90 57
200 5.00 48
1$ !
!:lo 778"
110 0.18 30
90
.20 28
125 4.00 532
130 2.90 860
100
125 1
- RTI
60 1
.30 42
.40 32
IFTER CONV
.80 645
120 2.60 430
240 3.60 48
270 2.80 40
70 1.60 624
120 2.20 399
210 3.70 45
260 2.70 30
80 ;
125 !
120 1
1.30 266
i.BO 95
.50 30
70 0.65 8
90 ;
130 I
140 ;
80 I
1.80 227
.40 85
.60 40
i.70 15
0.8
0.3
0.4
0.4
0.5
0.1
0.3
0.3
0.5
0.8
0.3
0.3
0.4
0.2
0.3
0.3
0.1
0.1
0.4
0.3
0.1
0.1
0.4
0-3
0.8
0.2
0.6
0.6
0.4
0.4
0.7
0.8
0.3
0.2
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.2
0.5
0.4
0.2
0.1
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.1
0.5
0.4
—
™"~
"*~
_„_
„ _
•B—
...
_,_,
—
—
--
—
—
—
__
__
_
"~
_
—
—
Jl^_
m_
_
-_
__
_„
»—
- RT AFTER CONV —
100 •
105 ;
780 1Z
850 11
100 «
1.50 511
.00 266
'.00 21
.00 19
1.10 378
120 4.40 166
1080 10.00 20
1300 10.00 14
90 3.80 368
90 2.80 225
130 2.20 60
lto i
'.40 50
I.OO 368
.20 225
.80 75
130 2.70 54
0.1
0.0
0.1
0.3
0.2
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.1
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.1
0.1
—
_«.
—*.
~m
—
~m
—
~
™*
—
0.65 131
0.90 76
0.95 1592
1.30 1244
0.65 128
0.90 77
— N/A —
_
*_ ""^~~
— —
— —
_^ ^
— —
— —
__ _
— ___
— —
.-- »/A
— _ .._
— —
— —
—
_
_
__ --
—
—
U/A
_
_
w. ._ -, -
•— __—
__ _
__ _
_ _
«_ -
— — "•
N/A
— ~
— . •••
— ~
— «...
.— ._—
— -^J.
«. ...
— — —
— ---
"~" — —
13
0.7
1.2
1:3
—
—
—
— «.
—
—•
_
—~
—
—
-_
—
—
—
_
__
__
__
__
—
-
—
—
.«.
— .
—
—
_
_
__
—
—
—
—
— _
—
—
— ,
— .
»
m,^
**~
—
£1 31,
HC
CO NOX 02
- LFT AFTER CONV -
10 0.15 348 0.1
25 0.05 547 0.2
190 6.40 41 0.8
220 1.50 41 0.8
20 0.05 327 0.1
35 0.09 358 0.1
170 6.30 38 0.8
210 5.70 38 0.8
30 0.60 593 0.0
30 0.60 133 0.0
25
40
30
i
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
_
«
—
—
....
—
—
~
—
_
__
—
—
__
—
_-
^ ^
*_
—
—
_
«_
_
_
_
^^
— _
_
—
_
— —
— —
—~*
__
—
0.05 118 1.4
O.Q3 64 1.3
0.85 808 0.1
0.40 141 0.0
0.02 123 1.8
0.02 59 1.2
N/A
« umirt w_
—
— ___ — .
_„_ • •JIB ^^
— -T-—T- __.
~*~ ™~Jl ~""
« — • —_
_J_ ••.• „_
— —
n/«
__ ^_
— —
— — — —
— _
_ _
— _ _
— __ __
.« ..»_ «
_ _
— —
-- N/A * -
_ — _
_m _ Tm-^-m .—
— . j.-^. —
«h_ «_* — «.
__ _ :
__ _ _
„ „ __
_ -— — .
~~ — . ™
— N/A
_— —•• ••!
-», _— —
«. -, :- , •—
__ — —
— — —
~ -~
_ _
— — — —
— — — —
•_ I»P_B —
_ _ —
— •"— ~—
THREE MODE TEST EMISSION RESULTS ARE: HC - PPM/HEX, CO - J, UNCORRECTED NOX - PPM
N-41
-------
APPENDIX N.CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL THREE NODE TEST EMISSION RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
VEH
NO. YEAR MAKE HODL
CID
H.P. —
30NPH 50MPH
DENVER
RIGHT EXHAUST SYSTEM
HC CO NOX 02 HC CO NOX 02
LEFT EXHAUST SYSTEM _
HC 00 NOX 02 HC 00 NOX 02
624 1975 FORD PUTT 140
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
649 1975 FORD GRAN 302
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
653 1975 FORD STAW 351
BEFORE MICE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
654 1975 FORD ELTT 400
BEFORE MICE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
655 1975 FORD LTD 460
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
N/A —
- RIGHT EXHAUST -
0 0.50 1791
0.75 995
- RIGHT EXHAUST —
- T.P. COMPOSITE -
— LEFT EXHAUST
-LFT AFTER CONV -
1J5 W 6
20 1.40 1443 3.1
1QO 3i20 30 5 '.3
1.70 20 6.0
0.90 860
1.
150 1.
100 0.4
20 0.
25 1.
45 0.92 880
120 1.1" ""
145 1.
105 0.35
1.00
1.15
80 1.90
40 0-75
D
IDLE N
50 MPH
30 MPH
- RIGHT EXHAUST -
- T.P. COMPOSITE -
80 1.70 941 0.2
0.1
FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST EMISSION RESULTS ARE: HC - PPM/HEX, CO - f, UNCORRECTED NOX - PPM
-------
APPENDIX N.CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST EMISSION RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
VEH
NO. YEAR MAKE MODL CID
H.P. —
30MPH 50MPH
HC CO
DENVER
RIGHT EXHAUST SYSTEM
NOX 02 HC CO NOX
02
HC CO
LEFT EXHAUST
NOX 02 HC
CO NOX 02
656 1975 FORD GRAN 351
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MICE
REPLICATE
664 1975 FORD THND 460
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
665 1976 LINC CONT 460
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
667
BEFORE MICE
REPLICATE
AFTER MICE
REPLICATE
672 1975 MERC MONG 351
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
(12) (26)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPR
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50
30
ID
MPH
MPH
DLE (D)
(N)
(18) (36)
50 MPH
IDLE HO
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
LMPH
MPH
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
MPH
. MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 HPH
IDLE , UNCORRECTED NOX - PPM
N-43
-------
VEH
NO. YEAR MAKE MODL CID
APPENDIX N.CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST EMISSION RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
— H.P. — RIGHT EXHAUST SYSTEM —
3QMPH 50MPH HC CO NOX 02 HC CO NOX C
HC CO
LEFT EXHAUST SYSTEM
NOX 02 HC CO NOX
02
675 1975 OLDS OMEG 260 (15) (3J
BEFORE MTCE 50
REPLICATE
AFTER MICE
REPLICATE
30 L_.
(D
IDLE (N)
689 1975 PLYM DUST 225 (12) (26)
BEFORE MTCE 50 MPH
REPLICATE•
AFTER MICE
REPLICATE
690 1975 PLYM VALI 225 (12) (26)
BEFORE MTCE 50 MPB
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
691 1975 PLYM DOST 225
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
IDLE (N)
(12) (26)
50 MPB
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
694 1975 PLYM FURY 360 (15)
BEFORE MTCE 50
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
- RIGHT _.
80 0.65 1
100 ' "
2.
- RT AFTER CONV
HO 0.15 1617 0.4
N/A —
i».20 o.
1.10 181
0.50 511
{1.50 82
4.70 51
N/A
N/A
N/A —
N/A
N/A --
MPH — — — __ — —
N/A
N/A
- RT AFTER CONV
90 2.50
160
- RIGHT .
105 2.80
160 2.60 1
.40
.10
— LEFT EXHAUST —
110 2.80 1144 0.7
185 4.40 552 0.7
220 6.30 8:
170 1.90 116!
210 3.50 7'
200 6.80 76 0.8
90 1.70 941 OJ
170 2.40 716 0.
- LFT AFTER CONV -
" - " "- 0.1
0.1
50 2.70
200 4.40
-LFT
240 2.
240 5.00
400 10.00
400 10.
90
— LEFT EXHAUST —
110 2.40 614 0.6
FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST EMISSION RESULTS ARE: HC - PPM/HEX, CO - %, UNCORRECTED NOX - PPM
N-44
-------
APPENDIX N.CONT'D
LISTING OP FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST EMISSION RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
VEH
NO. YEAR MAKE MODI CID
H.P. —
30MPH 50MPH
HC CO
DENVER
RIGHT EXHAUST SYSTEM
NOX 02 HC CO NOX
02
LEFT EXHAUST SYSTEM
HC CO NOX 02 HC CO NOX 02
696 1975 PONT FIRE 250
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
698 1975 PONT FIRE 350
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
699 1975 PONT LEMA 350
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
700 1975 PONT CATA 400
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MICE
REPLICATE
701 1976 PONT FIRE 400
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MICE
REPLICATE
(12) (26)
50 MPH
30
IDLE
IDLE
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
"" MPH
N/A —
N/A
IS!
IDLE
(15) (3D
50 MPH
MPH
MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
0 MPH
MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
(15) (3D
50 MPH
50
30
IDLE (N)
(&
-------
APPENDIX N.CONT'D
LISTING OP FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST EMISSION RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
VEH
H.P. —
DENVER
RIGHT EXHAUST SYSTEM
LEFT EXHAUST SYSTEM
NO. YEAR MAKE MODL CH> BOTH 50MPH HC CO NOX 02 HC CO NOX 02 HC CO NOX 02 HC CO
NOX 02
705 1975 DATS B210 85
BEFORE MICE
REPLICATE
AFTER MICE
REPLICATE
709 1975 OPEL STAW 116
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE.
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
713 1975 TOYO CORO 13J»
BEFORE '
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
711 1975 VOUC SBDA 97
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
715 1975 VOLK SEDA 97
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
( 9) (21)
50 MPH
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
IDLE
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50
IDLE
50
MPH
N/A
N/A
- RIGHT EXHAUST -
4.60
5.8
0.3
0.2
N/A
6.40 111 0.2
4.80 839 0.4
6.20 430 0.2
130
110
110
N/A
MPH — — — _ __ — _
- RIGHT
130 1.702588 0.7
180 1.502140 0.6
N/A
50
70
300
50
70
1.30 1020
pjlo
0~28 176
1.20 1045
0.55 542
250 0.25
0.4
491 Kb
T.5
1*
176 2.4
( 9) (21) - RIGHT EXHAUST -
170
220
480
125
195
280
5.20
.90
(Tso ""
1.75 2
2.40 1
0.8 - -
N/A
— LEFT EXHAUST —
160 3.40 12" ' -
110 1.50
— LEFT EXHAUST —
75 0.75 1841 4.5
155 2.00 819 4.9
"60 7725 ~4 4~7o
70 C
155 2
__ — ___ — _ 70 0.85
_
~34
500
"120
— 100
- 115
— ~20
0.75 1095
1.70 _747
0.25 .37
1.
696
5729 ~~46
N/A —
4:9
4.4
4.6
4J
U'.6
i»7o
N/A
0.6 — - — - - -
0.8 — — — — — —
0.6 — — — _
o7e ~ - — — - -
100 2.60 900 0.7 — — — — — —
120 1.40 348 0.6 — — — — — —
N/A —
N/A
N/A
FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST EMISSION RESULTS ARE: HC - PPM/HEX, CO - %, UNCORRECTED NOX - PPM
N-46
-------
APPENDIX N.CONT'D
LISTING OP FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST EMISSION RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO.
716
717
nufi
v*tO
047
048
YEAR MAKE MODL CID
1975 VOUC SSDA 97
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
1975 VOLK THAN 109
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
1Q7U AbMTl itfTOti 3nll
ty f H nmj njnn jUH
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
1974 BUIC RIVI 455
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
1974 BUIC CENT 350
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
H.P. —
30MPH 50MPH
( 9) (21)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
Xnff|% (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
(12) (26)
\ i^/ \twy
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE D
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
TTIF.f^ (D)
IDLE (N)
,.-» (yf.)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (N)
LMPH
(D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
XPI^i? to)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
(18) (36)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
§0 MPH
IDLE (D}
IDLE UO
50 MPH
IDLE ?D )
IDLE (N)
(15) (3D
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
en upu
jv nsst
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
TM P fv\
HC
RICH!
CO NOX
' EXHAI
02
- RIGOT EXHAUST -
160 3.10 w_
__ __
— —
__ ___
^ ^ -
— —
_- N/ft
-_. — —
— -_— .
— . — T_»
— — .
_. __»
— —
--— __„
«-» — i
— — , i.
— — ._
— —
N/A
__ -
— — _
__ ___
__ — __
—
—
z ~
_ —
fmtm _ _
0.4
ST4
0.4
0.3
574
0.5
0.3
574
0.4
0.3
0.3
—
»
_
—
__
__
=
__
I,- „
—
„,._
—
^
—
«—
—
—
j,_
--T-
«
—
—
•>_
*—
..-- —
—
—
m_
—
~
•—
—
- RIGHT EXHAUST -
120 2.60 1393 3.2
205 2.50 945 3.5
200 1.90 70 4.4
180 0.70 38 4.8
140
200
200
150
45
I
\l
90
II
3.00 1244
2.90 796
2.00 70
0.75 38
1.80 645
2.40 276
0.42 8§
0.29 ,44
1.70 624
2.30 307
0.40 96
n 5R en
3.2
3.5
4l7
2.7
3.3
4.7
1:1
3-11
4.7
K 1
HC CO NOX 02
_
— — —
. — . — —
— __ __ «
^-l- — _ J^L. _.
— — __- -_
.»_ « Jill— «
— _ _^ _^ _mr
— __ J.-- 1 —
— — — _ —
«_ • - J — •
_ _ _
T P COMPOSITE
150* 6.60 204 0.4
180 3.00 276 0.3
« •_ •r,— «.
370 8.10 43 0.3
1J5 6.10 255 0.3
180 3.40 266 0.3
340 7760 "~46 573
80 6.00 409 0.5
105 4.00 470 0.2
~70 2.90 "Til 0~.2
80 6.80 389 0.4
140 3.30 430 0.3
_«. _ __| - n -1,-m
80 2.70 136 0.2
-1 ' N/A
— » _— _
~ ~ ~ ~
— .» •„,.— _—
— __ _„-_. __
_ — — - —
_
_» — _m_, __
-H. » jt-m.— — rr
— . — _ -- __
— — _w« —
— ~ —
—.
- T.P. COMPOSITE -
140 1.50 1742 4.0
200 1.45 911 4.5
190 0»30 255 6.0
105 0.25 o4 7.3
ifc 2*00 1393 3*«
215 1.60 829 4.5
190 0.45 266 5.6
110 0.30 89 7.2
160 1.85 1393 2.5
200 1.35 839 2.7
165 0.22 229 4.8
100 0.20 77 5.7
140 1.80 1468 2.5
190 1.40 839 2.7
155 0.20 276 4.8
105 0.22 103 5.6
______ H/Jk __—__—
_ — __ — _
__ __ — — —
^™" ^^ i ^^
_ — — _
— — — —
_ — — _— —
— — _— —
HC
—
—
—
__
—
__
__
—
__
—
—
_-.
^ _
—
__»
m_
—
=
—
_»_,
—
f
245
Iso
250
380
400
230
2rO
2oO
210
240
270
245
200
__
„
__
—
—
—
„_,
—
__
—
—
=
—
-
— —
I PFT
CO NOX
. iii. •_ N/ft
— —
—
— ——
____ ^—wr
—
-»-. ••«-
j__ — w.m-
_-._,-
— _
_,-_ __„„.
« —
M/A ...
_*-. — — mr
—. - L,,;
— „•
—
_ ^ ^
_- ___
_
— ___
__ _JH
—
17PT BTfHAn*5n
-OT 1 EU-DAUOJ
1.50 2986
1.55 1493
2.90 103
4.00 65
1.40 2886
1.50 1468
3.20 96
4.70 80
1.40 2364
1.60 1095
1 .80 171
2.20 80
1.50 2364
1.40 1119
1.90 171
2.30 95
N/A —
_~ — _
_w ___
_
— ___
— —
— —
_. - —
_«. «
— -- .-
-— N/A_—
— — -
-_. _
~ —
— —
_ —
— —
— —__
EXHAUST SY
02 HC
~~
—
— •
__
_
-
__
__
__
—
—
__
—
—
«_-_
._^
—
=
__
^ _
—
F
1.0
0.8
0.5
0.4
0.8
0.7
0.5
0.6
0.8
0.7
0.5
0.4
0.8
0.6
0.5
0.4
«—
«-_.
__
__
—
~
~~
—
__
—
—
—
—
—
_
—
~~
—
—
__
_
_
— _
^ _
_ _
__
_ _
—
—
.11,—
_
—
—
—
^ ^
__
—
__
__
—
JJI,,
—
—
_
—
.-
—
_—
«-
_«.
—
_^ r
—
—
«
— -*
__»
—
~
__
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
~~~*
cn*cu
CO NOX 02
M /K
— — — —
— —
— •— _
_ ___
— •— — _,
— . — -•
__ J.__ _
rlm _„.•_ __
« •-,• __
—V -J — — -.11
.
-* N/A
— — — _ j
_ _ ^j.^ __
— —
— „_- — _
— _
___
__ — _ —
— —
— _ __
— —mi.- --
— —
M/» „
__ -«_ —
— — —
— ___ _
— ••-- —
__ — - __
—
— — _j._ —
— _ — _
— __n- — . .
—
— — —
__ _ __
N/A
— — —
. ••• — .
— — - —
__ — —
_ —
- ~ ~
~ - —
— — —
_ — _
N/A
— * — ™ —
— — — —
_ — —
_ — —
_ — —
_ — —
FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST EMISSION RESULTS ARE: HC - PPM/HEX, CO - %, UNCORRECTED NOX - PPM
H-47
-------
APPENDIX N.CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST EMISSION RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
RIGHT EXHAUST SYSTEM LEFT EXHAUST SYSTEM
NO. YEAR MAKE MODL CID 30MPH 50MPH HC CO NOX 02 HC CO NOX 02 HC CO NOX 02 HC CO
VEH
H.P. —
NOX 02
019 1971 CHEV VEGA 140
BEFORE HTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MICE
REPLICATE
050 1974 CHEV MONT 350
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE .
AFTER MICE
REPLICATE
051 1974 CHEV NOVA 250
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
052 1974 CHEV CAMA 3!
BEFORE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
053 1974 CHEV CHEL 350
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
( 9) (2J)
MPH — —
(D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
IDLE (N)
(12) (26)
50 MPH
IDLE
MPH
IDLE
IDLE
N/A
N/A
N/A
- RIGHT .
185 1.65
170
N/A
- T.P.
N/A
— LEFT _
75 1.00
250 5.30
N/A
_ LEFT EXHAUST
160
230
2.
30 1G
00 2
1.20
3.00
3.10
55 1.15 32
110
.160
_ — _ 170
— HI — "go
N/A
2.10 1020
2.40 229
3.10 1
bTeo "35
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A --
3»7 •""• -**• ••"""* "—"
Q Q mrm. —i- r- •_.. * mm
3,9 «*. •- —- —
eTo Z Z ZZ Z
N/A
N/A
FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST EMISSION RESULTS ARE: HC - PPM/HEX, CO - %, UNCORRECTED NOX - PPM
B-48
-------
APPENDIX N.CONT'D
LISTING OP FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST EMISSION RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
VEH
NO. YEAR
HAKE MDDL CID
H.P. —
30MPH 50MPH
HC CO
DENVER
RIGHT EXHAUST SYSTEM
NOX 02 HC 00 NOX
02
HC CO
LEFT EXHAUST SYSTEM
NOX 02 HC CO NOX
02
054 1971
055 1974
056 1971
057 1971
058 1974
CHEV CAPR 400
BEFORE MICE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
DODG CHAR 318
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER KTCE
REPLICATE
DODG DART 225
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
FORD PINT 122
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
FORD HAVE 302
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MICE
REPLICATE
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30
IDLE
IDLE
50 MPH
30 KPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
(15) (31)
(D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 KPH
IDLE (N)
(12) (26)
50 MPH
(D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
(D)
IDLE (N)
50 KPH
30
IDLE
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
(12) (26)
50 MPH
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
IDLE (D
IDLE (N
-RIGHT
68 2.40
100 2.70
245 8.60
240 9.10
80 2.
m
300
EXHAUST -
I 624 0.4
317 0.3
N/A
N/A —
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A —
— 280
= P8
— LEFT EXHAUST —
170 3.30 665 3-1
300 3.30 399 5.9
400 8.10 50 1.9
335 7:i I 1:8
.10 327 2.8
.80 56 3.0
.00 46 3.1
N/A
140
200
130
110
160
180
180
140
3.60
3.00
2.00
1.00
4.00
3.40
2.40
2.30
235
170
N/A
N/A
819
y I __ — - __ —« __ ___ __ __ ™u
0.6 — — - - _____ — — — _-
N/A
3.40 61 0.3
. S.JO 1418 0.7
210 1.60 737 " ~
160 2.40 62
0.5
(K2
155 2.30 1592 1.0 — — — — — — — — — — — —
240 1.85 1269 0.6 — — — — — — — — — — — —
230 3~10 ~~57 0~3 — — — — — — — - — _ — —
190 1.80 1816 1.0 — — — — — — — — — — — —
260 1.50 1443 0.7 — — — — — — — — ~~~H
iTs iTeo 59 0.2 — — — — — — — — — — — —
- RIGHT EXHAUST -
N/A
N/A —
N/A
FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST EMISSION RESULTS ARE: HC - PPM/HEX, CO - %, UNCORRECTED NOX - PPM
N-49
-------
APPENDIX N CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST EMISSION RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
VEH
NO. YEAR MAKE
MODL CID
H.P. —
30MPH 50MPH
HC CO
DENVER
RIGHT EXHAUST SYSTEM
NOX 02 HC CO NOX
02 HC
LEFT EXHAUST SYSTEM
CO NOX 02 HC CO
NOX 02
059 1974 FORD
060 1974 FORD
HAVE 250
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
LTD 400
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
(12) (26)
~" MPH
061 1974 FORD
062 1974 LINC
063 1974 MERC
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
(15) (3D
50 MPH
LTD 400
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
CONT 460
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
IDLE (D
IDLE (N
50 MPH
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
(18) (36)
50 - —
MONT 302
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
N/A
- RIGHT EXHAUST -
150 2.30 819 0.4
- RIGHT EXHAUST -
215 3-80 1443 O.jj
'
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A —
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST EMISSION RESULTS ARE. HC - PPM/HEX, CO - », UNCORRECTED NOX - PPM
H-50
-------
APPENDIX H CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST EMISSION RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO
064
065
066
067
nfift
uoo
YEAR MAKE MODL CID
1974 OLDS CUTL 350
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
1974 OLDS DELT 350
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
1974 OLDS 98 455
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
1974 PLYM SATE 318
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
KVTli 01 vu mion* ooc
IV71 rLIM DUST 225
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
HP —
30MPH 50MPH
(15) (3D
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE D
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 KPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
(15) (11)
\ 1 Jt \ J 1 /
50 MPH
H)LE CD)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
(18) (16)
\ »u/ \jw/
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
10 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
(15) (3D
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE CD)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
JP^xE \Dj
IDLE (N)
/ «OA f oA^
1 12; I2b;
50 MPH
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
10 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
IDLE (N)
LMPH
KPH
(D)
IDLE (N)
HIGH! EXHAUST S
HC CO NOX 02 HC
- RIGHT EXHAUST -
180 1.20 921 1.6
230 2.10 532 3.4
230 2.00 70 3.1
170 2.10 46 3.3
170 1.20 962 1.8
ig f:ie hi -j
160 1.50 40 3-4
150 1.20 941 2.3
215 2.60 481 2.2
165 0.35 88 2.8
110 0.45 51 2.7
160 1.65 819 111
220 2.60 409 1.9
160 0.20 82 2.2
100 0 40 62 2.3
•" RIGHT E3CHAOST **
160 2.40 706 0.6
240 2.00 767 0.5
140 1.80 128 0.3
130 3-50 76 0 2
140 2.20 665 0.6
240 2.20 624 0.5
140 1.60 118 0 3
130 3-40 71 0 2
165 1.40 1219 0.7
300 1.40 1294 0.6
110 0.20 81 1.1
100 0.20 61 2.1
180 2.20 941 0.4
290 1.50 1070 0.6
150 0.20 71 3.5
140 0.25 57 2.5
— RTRHT P3THAn*VP -»
•* IUUu4 CWUlnUOX "*
105 0.70 1642 1.0
190 1.60 1194 0.9
215 2-30 85 1.3
175 3.10 52 1.5
110 1.00 1742 0.9
185 1.70 1617 0.9
210 2.60 88 1.1
190 3-50 59 1.0
110 1.00 1791 0.8
230 3-20 921 0.8
210 2.80 106 3-3
190 3-80 49 3.2
140 2.10 1493 0.6
250 4.60 798 0.8
250 4.10 90 3.3
220 4.60 48 3.2
- RIGHT EXHAUST -
220 1.40 1667 0.9
320 1.80 900 1.0
230 1.20 85 3.2
450 0.70 52 3.8
220 1.20 1393 0.9
310 1.70 767 1.1
230 1.10 72 1.3
450 0.70 48 4.1
150 1 50 1194 0 8
200 2 00 532 0 6
170 0.50 131 1.8
100 0.10 78 19
140 1.40 1045 0.9
200 2.10 440 0.6
170 0.60 lib 1.7
100 0.40 70 1.8
U/A
—
_«. *»•_ • • — jji»
« *._ ___ __
— — —
— "— ~~ ~ ~~
~
__
—
„
__
__
__
_«
__
— —
—
—
.»
—.—
...
—
__^
«
——
— —
—
—
«
—
__
—
-- .
—
„._
—
—
~
—
—
~
_
«._
«._
—
*™
—
»
~_
v«
—
—
~
—
— _
__
~
—
""~
M
fSTEM -
CO NOX
...... H/i ...
— -«_»
__ _.
—
_
— --^jm
— — _ . — 1m
__ • „.
_ —
_ _ •»_••
__.„
U/A
__ __„
—
__ ___
« ••_•
—
_
— — •
— —
„„ __„,
— — — If
— . __
_ — _,
—
..... N/fl --.
— __w
—
_— —
— ___
— — — _
— ___
— -
— __
— _—
— _— ,
—
U/A
_— »
-- -.•
— . __
— ___
— — —
_ _ — "
— — j^.
— __^
_ —
» •! 1 .1
N/fl
—
_ _
... .-.
_ ___
-- — —
_
—— ' — -iw
—
02
«
jUj
—
—
—
—
ja—
^^
^_
__
_—
—
—
__
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
_—
—
—
_.
—
__
~"~
—
—
— .
—
—
_-
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
z
—
—
«-
_
««~
—
iic
—
__
—
—
__
__
__
__
^_
«
__
—
—
__
—
__
^_
—
__
__
__
__
__
__
—
__
~™
—
«
__
— .
__
_
_
—
_—
—
__
«
__
—
—
—
__
«
—
_.
—
LEFT
CO NOX
. .-- N/A .
_
— _ -I,,
—
—
__
_— -.»»
J— — ,„„
— -•-,
_ _m^
« _jm
— ^ J_M-r-.
--
.- H/A
— — __..v_
—
« — •!„
— _ -mmi.—
—
— ^ ^^^
— — —
— -„ ,
__, -,.i|,.^
— . -,M«^
— -,.«•
__ -,_ll,.—
--
N/A
—
— — —
— »*-
— -•-m-
« —
_ — -m-
— -
— —
—
— , —
—
N/A
— —
— . -.^r
_ —
—
— —
_^ iravi
— --.IT
—_-.
_
_ — _~
—
EXHAUST SY
02 HC
—
__
—
—
_
_-,
m _,
— .
__
— —
__
—
—
__
,,
_
—
__
—
__
— .
~
m_
—
m-_
"~~
—
_-
—
~_
—
—
—
—
—
— .
—
_
__
"*"•
—
—
—
—
—
—
_ _
—
—
_
«.
_^
_|_
n^
^_
.^—
—
—
_^_
_,_
^_^
—
— »
—
__
^,_
^_
^_
—
__
—
—
__
_„
_
—
—
—
-n^^.
—
—
—
—
~~
~
__
—
—
—
«
— 120 2.20 1966
250 3.80 1045
—
_
—
—
M
— "
350
320
270
370
330
140
138
18
220
195
150
8.80 75
8.80 61
2.50 1592
3.80 788
9.00 67
8.60 60
2.10 1567
1-00 941
4.20 116
1.10 84
2.10 1368
3.00 972
1.70 106
3.90 73
0.5
0.9
0.9
0.5
0.4
0.8
0.8
0.7
0.5
0-8
0.8
0.5
0.9
0.7
—
__
—
"•—
—
»
—
—
—
STEM
CO NOK
_ »/a
_ —
^^ ••^
—
—
__ «»
— » »—- .
-«, __^
— m — ,^ — _
__ _— »
^_Br _ __ ^ i
— — .
M/4
^v. • •-.
—
_ _^_^
—_ — ••.
_ —
— ^ — — ^
— ••*
„
_.„ _^
_-. _»,- .
_,„.•
_«, _W4
— —
_ —
—
_ —
__ •«,-.
__ vw—
__ — ™—
_ —
__ —
— — — .
__ _
— —
N/A —
__ _»—
— — *-
__ —
— —
__ —
~ ~~
__ _-
_ __
_ —
— — —
« —
N/A
~~ —
— — •
-------
APPENDIX N.OONT'D
LISTING OP FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST EMISSION RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH HP.— RIGHT EXHAUST SKTEM
NO YEAR MAKE MQDL CID 30MPH 50MPH HC CO NOX 02 HC CO NOX 02
LEFT EXHAUST SXSTEM
HC CO NOX 02 HC CO
NOX 02
IDLE (D
IDLE (N
(15) (3D
50 MPH
- RIGHT EXHAUST -
190 2.80 920 0.5
"flO 4.20 450 0.4
".00 80 0."
.60 .75 0.'
•70
069 1974 PONT BONN 400
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
070 1974 PONT LEMA 350
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MICE
REPLICATE
071 1974 DATS 610 119
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
072 1971 MAZD RX3 70 (9) (21) N/A
BEFORE MICE 50 MPH — —
REPLICATE
AFTER MICE
REPLICATE
EXHAUST -
( 9) (21)
50 HPH
N/A
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
IDLE (N)
073 1974 TOXO CELI 97 (9) (21)
BEFORE MTCE ~
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
— N/A
N/A
- T.P.
110 4
135 2
110
165
800
180
160
.16 13 11.2
.20 368 3.3
.60 430 4.4
.07 27 10.2
.60 266 3.4
.60 255 5.3
- RIGHT EXHAUST - N/A
60 0.70 1717 1.7 — — —
130 0.40 870 1.5 ~ — —
~ ~ 57? — — —
2.4 — — —
1.5 — — —
340 6^20 52 0.7 — — —
350
50
110
6.60 50
o!40 839
70
120
210
0.50 1518
0.40 716
0.40 50
0.30 1343
0.40 665
I;)
Fi
3.3
250 0 50 52 3-8 —
N/A —
N/A
N/A
N/A —
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST EMISSION RESULTS ARE- HC - PPM/HEX, CO - >. UNCOHRECTED NOX - PPM
M-52
-------
APPENDIX N.CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST EMISSION RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
NO
074
V t~
075
352
354
721
YEAR MAKE MODL CID
1974 VOLK SEDA 97
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
1974 VOLK SEDA 97
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
1974 CHRY NEW 400
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
1974 FORD ELIT 351
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
1974 AMMO GREM 232
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
30MPH 50MPH
( q) (21)
\ 71 \f- 1 /
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
LMPH
MPH
(D)
IDLE (N)
( 9) (21)
50 MPH
^PLE CD)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
Tnfjr (D)
IDLE (N)
LMPH
MPH
IDLE (N)
(15) (3D
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPR
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MFH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE D
IDLE (N)
(15) (3D
50 MPH
30 MPH
Tn[.R mj
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
TPIJR (nj
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE D
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
IDLE $j
IDLE (N)
(12) (26)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
IDLE (N)
HC
__
__
—
__
__
—
—
—
_-
—
CO NOX 02 HC CO NOX
M/A
— _ __— __
— _ ___ __
— — __
» __
__ ___ __
-_ — __
— __
— _ __
— T
115
215
195
110
70
"60
140
370
345
110
320
290
- RIGHT EXHAUST -
95 1.25 2687 0.9 —
280 3-50 1219 0.5 —
-___
105
2*8
...
335
160
190
_.
350
u°
180
ino
— ___
6.30 58 0.8
1.25 3085 0.9
3.30 1667 0.5
6720 ~~64 677
0.90 3384 1.9
2.202364 1.5
__ _.„.. ___
2.60 77 1.8
1.702364 1.6
2.30 1567 1.8
T7go "73 -74
- RIGHT EXHAUST -
140 3.20 645 0.4
190
400
600
140
195
420
600
135
110
120
130
150
110
120
2.00 1095 0.5
7.80 38 1.0
7.80 30 0.8
3.20 614 0.4
I'M 29 oil
8.00 27 0.7
2.80 511 0.4
1.20 900 0.6
1.00 74 1.4
1.30 46 1.2
3.00 450 0.3
1.40 1045 0.6
0.75 72 1.5
1.30 48 1.1
- RIGHT EXHAUST -
270 1.70 1244 0.8
340
340
280
430
440
400
400
350
t
—
E
—
—
—
__
2.60 796 0.7
7.40 126 0.5
8.80 52 0.5
1.90 1194 0.7
3-00 1045 0.6
8 80 80 0.7
8.40 50 0.5
2 20 945 0 9.
2 40 1244 0 8
1.40 121 1.2
1.60 95 1.0
2.40 1045 0.7
2.60 1194 0.7
1.60 634 1.0
2.20 75 0.9
H/*
E E E
— __
._ ... ..
— — —
— — ..
__.
__
—
__
~
~
_.__
__
—
—
— —
—
-._.
-.«.
—
— ~
~
--
—.
_
__
_-_
__
—•
_.-.
~
—
—
~
—
—
~
—
—
__
P/YMPO.QT1
* lAjnTUOXJ
1 .50 2986
2.50 1742
4720 ~79
1 .60 2986
3.00 1443
_._. »-.
4.30 95
0.80 2787
3-10 995
3.60 64
0.90 2588
2.90 1070
§740 ~64
N/A —
___ ,_-,
.-. — __—
_—
__ —
__ —
__ •-.—
-.« —
— — ~—
...
,__- H/fl .....
_-— MMH-l
—
... M^nrr
.. ___.
_. »«
__
__. --------.--
—
.. - —
— ---—
U/A
-_— -r— n-
__ ...
— — .
— ~
_. .......
__
—
— — —
II
H/A
_ —
_ —
_ —
—
__ —
02
0.7
1.6
..^
0.7
2.3
1.7
o7s
1 2
0.8
o79
0'.7
o7g
HC
— _
.—
__
_
__.
—
_M
__
E
_
...
• ' ' L_E-T J.
CO NOX
N/A
— —
„_ ,_„__
—
— — -
_ __
—
_ j.»_.
— —
—
— ____
__ _.
ctfuuiu*?* •_>.**? J.&TI — — — — —
02 HC CO NOX
- N/A
— — . __ --_
_ _ _ __. — — —
— — — —
~ _ — . ™
— — — ...
— — — —
— — — — — — »«••
— .... —
E E E E
— «... — -
— — — —
02
^—
__
_._
—
—
___
—
_
—
—
—
— —
. _ _ jj/A -— - —-.—__ jj/A
__
^ _
—
__
—
—
_,-,
..
—
__
,„,„,
....
-.,-.,
__
—
^^
—
—
..
__
__
__
—
—
__
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
_
__
^^
—
__
—
~
,,,_,
_
._..
_,_
„,_„,
—
miMi
^ _
^_
—
—
«.
..
—
„_
—
..
^^
—
__.
—
—
—
—
i
80
230
18
270
180
80
215
140
90
220
160
» — .
— — J— —
—
— _• ___
— —
— —
-,j-
„ _„
— " — " —
— _
U/A aam „
mm mm,m
—
MM. TO-Hiim
_ _*__.
«
_-
—
— —-rr
— — -.
—
N/A
— —
— «„«-
«-. ,u.......
— —
_. --.-.
_ —
_ —
~ ~
— —
.EFT EXHAUST
0.35 1766
1.95 430
10.00 20
0.45 1592
2.00 460
1o7oo ~~21
0.70 1642
2.80 655
2~.50 ~~50
0.90 1742
2.80 655
3.00 55
-.I-, __ ^ _ ^___
™ i ^— — — ^i^mj*
—
— — — — — ___
— — —
— — ~
— — — „„ ___
.. -— «. „„„
— — — — " —
_
_
-™. __ »_, .....!,..!
— . «H» _ rn.-n.TB
— . __ — ^^.nn
™— __ „ _^_
— — —
_
— — —
_ —
__ __ __
— — —
„..
_
„. __
„
_ ^. __
— ~ —
_ » ~~ —
— — —
_____
__ __ — _—
z ~ ~ ~
. , . N/A
__' E E E
1.0 — — —
0.9 — — —
0.5 — — —
o7g — — —
1.0 — — —
Oc —arr-
.3 «•"" •*"•
oTe - — —
o!s — — —
0.6 — — —
__
—
__
—
—
mlnl
_^
___
__„
—
— _
_^
—
— ^^
—
—
_-.
__
...
__
__
_-__
_
—
__
=
—
_
—
—
~™
—
THREE MODE TEST EMISSION RESULTS ARE: HC - PPM/HEX. CO - %, UNCORRECTED NOX - PPM
M-53
-------
APPENDIX N.CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST EMISSION RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
VEH
NO YEAR
HP —
MAKE MODL CID 30MPH 50MPH
HC CO
DENVER
RIGHT EXHAUST SYSTEM
NOX 02 HC CO NOX 02
LEFT EXHAUST SYSTEM
HC CO NOX 02 HC CO NOX 02
724 1974
BUIC APOL 350 (12) (26)
BEFORE MTCE 50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
REPLICATE
50
3°
IDLE
IDLE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
728 1971
731 1974
732 1974
741 1974
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
IDLE (N)
CHEV VEGA 140 (12) (26)
BEFORE MICE 50 MPH
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
CHEV NOVA 350
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
CHEV NOVA 3!
BEFORE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
FORD PINT 122 ( 9) (21)
BEFORE MICE 50 MPH
(12) (26)
LMPH
MPH
(D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
N)
(12) (26)
50 MPH
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
MPH
; CD)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
N/A
N/A
MPH — — — — —
MPH — —
N/A
N/A --
- RIGHT EXHAUST -
1.00 819 3-0
1.50
1.10
165
410
450
120
200
4;
4<
N/A
N/A
- T.P. COMPOSITE -
205 2.00 726 1.1
350 4.00 151 1.0
2000 10.00
2000 10.00
265 3.80
440 6.00
2000 10.00
2000 10.00
200
325
1000
- RIGHT EXHAUST -
210 4.00 151 0.4
8!
— N/A ~
350 2.60
3.80
4.20
3.00
B5
26
350
220
100
330 3.20 28
180 4.20 227
250 2.00 113
25
230 1.80
220 4.00
290 2.00
260 2.00 29 0.2 — —
0.5 — —
-------
APPENDIX N.CONT'D
LISTING Or FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST EMISSION RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
w&n
NO.
713
711
718
753
757
YEAR MAKE MODL CID
1971 FORD PUTT 110
BEFORE MICE
REPLICATE
AFTER MICE
REPLICATE
1971 FORD PINT 110
BEFORE MICE
REPLICATE
AFTER MICE
REPLICATE
1971 FORD MAVE 302
BEFORE MICE
REPLICATE
AFTER MICE
REPLICATE
1971 FORD STAN 100
BEFORE MICE
REPLICATE
AFTER MICE
REPLICATE
1971 OLDS CUTL 350
BEFORE MICE
REPLICATE
AFTER MICE
DVDf T/*kVP
REPLICATE
30MPH 50MPH
(12) (26)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (H)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE D)
IDLE (N)
(12) (26)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 HPH
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
TiXfS CD)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
( 9) (21)
50 MPH
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
(18) (36)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
IMiB iD )
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
LHPH
MPH
(D)
IDLE (N)
(15) (3D
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
LUDtl
HPH
UDU
Mrs
(D)
IDLE (N)
HC CO NOX 02 HC CO NOX
- RIGHT EXHAUST -
350 8.20 131 0.6
700 9.20 85 0.6
-» «•> -, . _ n «_„
110 8.80 30 0.8
380 8.10 166 0.6
900 9 50 91 0.6
» — — -— • w—
150 9-50 28 0.7
310 7-60 171 0.5
150 5-20 317 0.8
— — _• _w _
210 1.00 50 0.7
320 7.80 191 0.5
100 5.00 337 0.6
230 iToo "50 oT?
- RIGHT EXHAUST -
250 7-10 250 0.1
100 3-00 757 0.3
350 1oT(X) ~21 0~3
270 7.60 266 0,1
300 3.10 631 0.1
350 10700 ~25 0~3
210 6.10 327 0.8
205 3-10 150 0.8
~\75 iTio ~?o oTe
230 6.20 255 0.8
230 1.90 995 0.8
130 1.60 ~~80 0.6
- RIGHT EXHAUST -
280 0.20 328% 2.2
110 0.19 1816 2.0
120 3-80 73 0.7
610 3.70 52 0.8
250 0.21 3285 2.2
175 0.20 1592 1.9
110 3-90 57 0.6
600 3.60 13 0.8
210 0.15 911 1.3
260 0.35 716 1.1
300 3.00 75 0.7
300 3.10 70 0.1
220 0.10 1211 1.3
300 0.38 1015 1.0
320 3.50 126 0.7
32) 2.70 75 0.7
- RIGHT EXHAUST -
50 0.50 778 0.5
15 0 56 286 0 3
75 1.22 106 0.6
100 1.15 72 0.5
60 0.56 819 0.1
65 0.68 266 0.3
120 1.27 106 0.7
130 1.25 72 0.9
180 1.60 1095 0 1
210 2 10 286 0 1
205 0.18 222 1.8
220 0.65 60 1.8
155 1 .61 995 0.1
195 2.15 215 0.1
125 Oil! 281 ill
. RIGHT EXHAUST -
130 0.30 1095 1.3
275 1.50 70 0.0
235 1.70 52 0.0
105 0.38 1095 1.3
190 0.10 911 1.1
210 1.30 69 0.1
190 1.20 51 0.1
120 1.00 819 0.8
180 0.50 593 1.1
120 0.30 96 2.1
100 0.36 60 1.7
100 0.80 915 0.7
115 o!30 16 2^1
100 0.11 30 1.5
—
•w
—
__
_*_,
—
~
_..
— -.
—
__
;;
--
—
~
^m
...»
...»
— «.
~"*
—
_m
_ a.
—
— ..
«
J-L
™
—
—
»
—
— ,
__
— .
«.
«
__
—
_-.
-*«
~~"
— ~
»
•m *
_„,
»->
—
—
"™*
—
N/A —
__ —— .
— —
_ _~_
~
_ —
« _--••
— . _J,T,
—
N/A —
— —
__ __
_
— ^ _...-- —
— •••
__ ...n.-
_» ij.il.-
_
__ —
. — N/A — .
___
__ _ j -
__ _ j
— — ~~—
^_B>
__ _
_
— —
N/A —
— ••-,-
_ _
__ _
— „•,-
™— ---
«.— —
« •-UI-
-.— - —
—
— —
w _— —
*"~ —
N/A —
— — —
__ __
.— ««
«. _ . n
_-
•*" -™™1™r
— _ -,-rn
02
—
vw
~
__
^.
—
—
VM.
- ,
—
__
—
—
—
—
_mfm
^_
-__^
^,_
—
—
,^—
L^
—
__
^_
—
_m^
—
—
—
^_
»_
^_
*_
_
»_
— _
—
— m
«.
—
_
—~
—~
,_.-._.
z
—
»_
^.
..^
—
—
—
HC
~
«_
—
—
_ ^
—
—
__
^^
—
_
—
—
—
—
_Km_
_
_,
_ —
—
—
,_,,_
...._
__
__
~~
— ,_
__
—
—
.
— —
—
—
—
—
—
«
__
—
—
~
"—
—
—
«_
•—
—
—
—
LJUfl
CO NOX
N/A —
•— - • T
— ...»
-~_ - - _r -
_
_
_~ --•
•— -—.mi
_
N/A —
— — —
— —
—
_ —
— — — —_
M ___
»~ _
— ™ —~—
—
— * ______
—
_• —
_» —
~* ~ ™~
^.^ m
— —
™ ~* — ^"^
— ~
fl/£
_ .ir^L
— II— r-
— . „-•._
— —
— -nr--
« •.—
— —
. • —
— Jr
—
— —
«. ••—
« i ™ "•
N/A
— —
— —
_ «_
— . •—
— »
— —
— —
— —
EJUUUOI o:
02 HC
-
__
—
-_
—
—
— .
,-„
—
_
—
—
—
^^
—
j
M_
«
—
„„ ^
j^
—
—
—
_ _
_
—
—
—
«.
«.
—
—
_—
—
—
—
m.
—
-
_
_
"™*
.
—
_
-_
—
—
—
~
•v
.
_-.
«~.
—
—
•—
«.•*
_
_
~
—
—
—
— ^
—
— m
—
~~
_
,__,„
_
—
—
—
~**
^mtm
_
—
_*
«.
— .
—
__
__
..
__
z
—
—
—
__
—
_
—
—
—
~~
— ^
u>ien —
00 NOX 02
N/A
— — -,imr
.
_«
______ •.»._ -,„,
— _
_ _
— — — — — .
— — •— -ma.
— — _
H/A
— — —
— — —
_ _
_ _
— ^ ^m ^
— _,_ ^^
„_ _ r _, ^^
__ —a._ _,_
— ^
— __
— _4ml_ .._
— «,-., _._
— ._.„ __
... —
^^ — J— __
— — .
— _
~ —
H/A
*. — —
— — —
«~ — —
— — _ —
__ — __
*. « —
««. — . — .
— — —
— — • —
__ _ —
BI._I — mrm — M
.._ __ — .
•« — •• — »
— — —
N/A
mr-~ — •->-. ""*
— ~ —
— — • "^
— — — "
-. —
Z . — —
•*• """" """
— — —
FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST EMISSION RESULTS ARE.- HC - PPM/HEX, co - %, UNCORRECTED NOX - PPM
H-55
-------
VEH
NO. YEAR MAKE MODL CID
APPENDIX N.CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST EMISSION RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
H.P. — RIGHT EXHAUST SYSTEM
30MPH 50MPH HC CO NOX 02 HC CO NOX
02 HC CO
LEFT EXHAUST SYSTEM
NOX 02 HC CO
NOX 02
(15) (3D
50 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
" MPH
IDLE
IS!
MPH
50
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
(12) (26)
50 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
(12) (26)
50 MPH
758 1974 OLDS CUTL 350
BEFORE MICE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
760 1974 PLYM DUST 225
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MICE
REPLICATE
761 1971 PLYM DUST 318
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
762 1971 PLYM FRY3 360 (15) (3D
BEFORE MTCE 50 MPH
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
765 1971 PONT LEMA 350
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
- RIGHT EXHAUST -
172§
195
0.22
0.07
0.10
N/A
MPH — —
N/A
- RIGHT .
70 1.16
110 0.90
N/A
N/A
N/A —
N/A
N/A
- T.P. COMPOSITE -
IDLE (N) ~ — —
N/A
— LEFT EXHAUST —
1.20 9
.20 139
.40 101
.40 181
1.30 92
210
120
260
220
155 2.00 „.
230 3.00 829 0.5
130 0.50 101 1.5
115 0.60 67 O.E
155 2.15 1070 0.5
230 2.80 788 0.5
140 1.80 103 0.9
120 0.60 69 1.0
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST EMISSION RESULTS ARE: HC - PPM/HEX, CO - %, UNCORRECTED NOX - PPM
N-56
-------
APPENDIX N.CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST EMISSION RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VDI1
NO.
«77n
If"
774
776
777
780
YEAR MAKE MODL CID 30MPH'50MPH
1O7U PTtt T 9PT1A Oft
\y ft lAJul OCu/ft JO
BEFORE MTCE
HEPUCATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
1974 FIAT 128 79
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
1974 TOYO CORO 120
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MICE
REPLICATE
1974 TOYO CORO 97
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
1974 VOLV 142 121
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
HC
•— •— — j\j.uni
CO NOX
02 HC CO NOX 02
( 9) (21) ~ DTrair cnmnrtCT
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
( 9) (21)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
IDLE (N)
LMPH
MPH
(D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
( 9) (21)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
( 9) (21)
50 MPH
IDLE ID )
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
IDLE (N)
(12) (26)
50 MPH
TDT..R (p)
IDLE (N)
30 MPH
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N
120 2.50 2140
225
— _
620
180
250
— .
740
110
190
240
110
170
.—
210
3.00 1717
.. ...
9.40 28
3.20 1742
3.80 1542
.-_ — -.-.
9.80 22
2.30 1368
2.(5o 1045
5.30 45
2.30 1343
2.50 1169
.. __
4.60 47
0.4
0.3
577
0.3
0.3
..
0.7
0.4
0-3
574
0.4
0.4
__
0.3
- RIGHT EXHAUST -
140
150
__
140
150
120
45
80
375
J
~90
__
~-
_.
—
--
...
-.
..
__._,
..
..
_.
_.
—
—
.-•
—
—
_ ^
_.
_..,
—
__
•*•'
__
—
—
.__
2.10 675
1.80 276
— — — .—
2.20 15
2.10 747
1.80 276
2.10 12
3.20 327
3.10 176
7.90 55
1.15 511
2.60 227
2.20 74
N/A
-_ —
__ ___
—
__
— — _
— _— _
__ —
__ »»
M/A
__ —
__
__
__ — __
__
_
.. ———
._
N/A
.. -—
__,_ ...
— —
— __
» _ ««
—
__ —
__ ..,.
2.7
3.5
2-7
3.4
2.8
0.7
0.7
i7s
2.0
0.7
i7e
— —
__
_ _
—
—
—
—
__
-_
__
—
__
__
—
__
—
~
..
—
—
—
__
__
—
—
__
_
—
—
—
N/A
— -_ —
__ _« ___ w_
_ _ __ ___
_ . ...
— — __ ~
•t« — — — « «—
~ — — —
__ _- — __
—
— — — --
__ r- ___ _H
__ __
}J/J _____
__ — — _
__ — - -_
__ __ ___ __
__
__ __ —
__ __ __
__ -»-» —-». «
~ — —
N/A
— — ___ —
— _ __ ___ __
— -- -— —
—
__ __ __
— — —
__ __
— __ ___ —
__ __ ___ __
—
N/A ^.«-
_^ __ ___ ^^
__ __ — —
__ — — - _
— — « — _—
«_. __ ___ _»
— — —
__ _ — —
— — _. .... -_.
.. — _ ... — -»
._ _-_,
... .. — .-
... — -_-_>. —
~ ~ ~ ~
__ — — —
— — — —
__ __ ___ __
— —
Z_ __ — -_
__ ._ ... .—
HC CO NOX 02 HC CO NOX 02
H/* _____
__ — — —
__ — _ ___ — _
__ — __
__ __ _
__ __
__ __ .— __
— — —
__ _ _
_— __ __— __
__ __ __
_
M/A.
— __ —
— __ — __
_ __ ... —
___ __
— — — ~
~ — — —
.. _— . .. ..
— — —
f EFT RYHAFRT
— — [j^.f i CJUuiUOl ™~
185 2.00 2486 0.9
200 1.05 1567 0.7
_ — __._!_- _
300 0.60 73 1.2
160 1.602485 0.8
170 0.80 1642 0.8
250 5725 ~~78 i72
130 2.50 1443 0.6
170 2.10 921 0.5
230 T20 ~0 57s
120 2.50 1318 0.5
120 1.20 900 0.6
.. __ ... _
230 1.90 57 0.5
I PPT PYHATIST
— i.r^ x UulAUwl ™~
200 1.70 2115 0.6
pon 5 ?n inns o 3
CUV J.CU lv*»3 U.J
175 l57oo ~~24 574
190 1.55 1941 0.6
200 3.20 399 0.3
__ ». — . _
180 10.00 25 0.4
200 1.60 737 0.7
260 3 20 276 0 4
__ _-. ... -»
240 2.30 29 0.4
200 1.70 542 0.7
270 3.20 199 0.4
250 T780 ~~26 0.5
LEFT EXHAUST
65 1.11 1642 0.4
75 1.09 511 0.4
_ _.. ... _
70 2.00 72 0.5
60 1.12 1493 0.4
70 1.02 532 0.4
~65 T769 ~~64 57s
163 2.70 1642 0.8
200 2.40 634 0.6
135 1.30 46 1.1
173 2.70 1443 0.7
185 2.50 552 0.6
120 T720 42 1.1
__
—
__
__
__
—
__
—
—
__
~
__
—
—
—
__
~
—
~~
—
_
~
_
—
—
—
~
—
—
__
—
__
__
—
—
__
__
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
•~
—
—
N/A
— _
__ __— __
__ ___ _
— _
__ ___ __
__ ••- ._
__
— —
__ —
__ _^
__ _•— __
— —
N/A
_ __
_ —
_— _•.. __
__ __
— —
— —
_ ... _
— —
M/A «__.
— —
__ __- __
— — —
— —
_ _
— —
— __— —
_ __- —
__ --— — —
— —
H/A
—
__ _
-_ __— —
— —
__ . —
«_. - . - —
— —
_ _
.-» -.-..•» —
_ —
__ . —
N/A -
— —^ ~"
— — —
_» _«v —
— . — — —
H — —
__ — —
__.-. ™ J™
Z — —
1. — —
FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST EMISSION RESULTS ARE: HC - PPM/HEX, CO - %, UNCORRECTED NOX - PPM
H-57
-------
APPENDIX N.CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST EMISSION RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
VEH
NO. YEAR MAKE MODL CID
HP —
3QHPH 50MPH
HC CO
DENVER
RIGHT EXHAUST SYSTEM
NOX 02 HC CO NOX
02 HC
LEFT EXHAUST SYSTEM
CO NOX 02 HC CO
NOX 02
101 1973 AMMO HORN 232
BEFORE MICE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
102 1973 BUIC ELEC 455
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
103 1973 CADI DEVI 172
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
104 1973 CHEV VEGA 140
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
105 1973 CHEV MALI 350
BEFORE MICE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
(12) (26)
50 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
IDLE (N)
(18) (36)
50 MPH
(18) (36)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
"" MPH
(D)
IDLE ....
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
MPH
MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
(15) (3D
50 MPH
" MPH
60
150
N/A
N/A
— LEFT EXHAI
N/A
110
200
150
1.70
0.40
0.45
1.40
1.60
0.9
0.
0.6
N/A
247
116
- T.P. COMPOSITE -
105 1.90 532 2.5
100 1.35 247 2-8
190 1.10
100 0.5
110 2.5
110 ;
185 1.10
.40
N/A
N/A
. EXHAUST -
.80 141 1.0
.50 126 2.3
.40 207 3.4
1:18 .
3.30 111
2.20 40
2.70 36
1.6
i*
1:1
1.2
N/A
N/A
N/A —
N/A
N/A
_ 245
— LEFT EXHAUST ~
0.45 2015 0.9
3.40 1119 0.4
N/A —
_ __ — __ __ __ — _ 280 7.60 78 0.3 — — — —
— — — ___ — _ 70 0.45 2140 0.8 — — — —
_ __ — _ _ _ — _ 260 3.95 242 0.3 — — — —
3.95
8.70
69
gg
0 80 1542
4 40 860
16
- RIGHT
0 2.00
0 1.90
90
1.50 ^
0.90 25
2.00 1020
2.00 604
1.35 71
1.10 34
N/A
280 6.7
70 0.45
220 4jZ
260 iTlO ~~85
N/A
0.3 - -
0.9 — —
574 — ^
574 — ~
N/A
5.9
2-S
190 3.50 21
140 2.70 156 3.3
55 1.15 45 4.-
FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST EMISSION RESULTS ARE: HC - PPM/HEX, CO - %, UNCORRECTED NOX - PPM
H-58
-------
APPENDIX N.CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST EMISSION RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
NO.
106
107
108
109
110
YEAR MAKE MODL CID
1973 CHEV NOVA 350
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MICE
REPLICATE
1973 CHEV IMPA 350
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
1973 CHEV IMPA 350
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
1973 CHEV IMPA 400
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
1973 DODG DART 225
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MICE
REPLICATE
SOMPH'SOMPH
(12) (26)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 HPH
IDLfB (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
TPkE (D)
IDLE (N)
(15) (311
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
ypf^ (p)
IDLE (N)
(15) (3D
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
(15) (3D
50 MPH
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
IDLE (N)
(12) (26)
50 MPH
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 HPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
HC CO NOX 02 HC CO NOX
- RIGHT EXHAUST -
150 3.00 604 3.4
190 3.50 151 3.6
190 1.30 80 6.0
150 0.50 40 7.1
170 2.80 778 3.3
190 3.50 136 3.5
190 1.30 74 6.1
140 0.60 40 7.0
90 1.20 716 3.6
120 2.10 179 3-8
120 3.10 64 4.0
50 1.00 44 4.5
85 1.30 624 3.5
115 2.20 156 3.8
120 3.00 68 4.2
40 1.00 44 4.7
- BTRHT RHIIIST -.
CUUUA UUUtUwl *
210 2.10 1244 3.4
205 0.80 972 4.2
280 0.55 70 6.4
260 0.30 65 7.5
200 1.50 1194 3.6
220 0.70 900 4.3
200 0.30 56 7.3
290 0.35 136 6.8
120 1.30 604 3.5
140 0.60 307 4.2
140 0.35 133 5.7
80 0.25 69 6.7
170 1140 209 |!j
120 0.60 156 5.4
60 0.70 103 5.8
- RIGHT EXHAUST -
55 1.70 573 2.8
95 0.70 389 3.6
150 3.20 50 3.0
60 1.75 32 3-3
60 1.80 604 2.6
100 0.70 491 3-7
140 3.10 60 3.2
60 1.70 35 3-6
110 1.70 696 3.0
140 0.60 532 3.9
170 1.10 106 5.5
120 0.50 38 6.4
115 2.10 737 2.5
145 0.70 593 3.5
175 0.90 121 5.0
100 0.60 40 5.9
- RIGHT EXHAUST -
45 1.45 675 2.0
90 1.10 409 3.0
125 3.70 50 1.8
40 1.75 41 2.7
40 1.10 890 2.3
100 1.00 593 3.2
120 3.60 48 2.2
45 1.80 37 2.8
30 1.20 593 1.8
60 0 50 409 35
140 1.90 75 4.5
50 1.00 45 4.9
35 2.00 368 1.2
50 1'.15 47 4i3
______ N/A '"-'•-•
_ — _
— — —
._ __ JI.-E- __
_H _ _ _ __
_ _ _ „.
•* « - _..
_. — — «_ — *
™ -- — — —
— —
__
„_
__
__
^^
«—
—
—
..
m_
...
..
._
—
. .
—
__
—
_
__
—
_
—
—
_
~_
—
._
—
--
_
~
—
T__
*_
—
«
II
—
__
—
_,_
«._
--
«.—
"—
—
— - N/A —
««. —
— I,,- _ .,-
_ ,_ ,„-„„-
_ —
— _,_m
_.— jn^ju
_. «.«
_. _w
-- .
__.._ H/ft -_,
-_ ^-^
._ „••
—
_ —IT
— —
_-
._ ---n
—
— -n-_r
-.-- H/ft ...
— .«—.
z :z
— ._.,!-•
._ -.11...
—
__ ___
__ _•—
_ ___
— _ -»_
N/A —
— —
_ __
— — —
— —
_ ___
__ ___
~ —
__ — _-
~ ~
N/A —
«. —
~ ~
"— — —
-— .••Jir
•_. ::r-, ::r
-_ _
.- —
H "
— -—
02
— _
,_,
_„
—
—
_•.
_
„,-
_,,.
-«.
_,.
_„
...
—
«
_
..
..
— '
..
-._
_
_
—
__
«.
«
E
__
—
—
_
—
—
•_
HC
_«
_
_ _
—
—
—.
„_
—
i _
—
__
^^
_j,^
—
—
—
-,—
—
__
— —
—
__
E
—
_
_
__
«
—
—
__
—
—
_ _
—
~
— _
«_
CO NOX
N/A —
. _
r- _ |
_ _
—
^^ ^^^
— . — —
mm_ j_m
«
«— —
— _„••
^.^ _, _, ,„-
— '
j^ __^
.
— —
_r-l ^__
.-. _«^
— —
~ ~
— —
___ _ j- _
—
_ —
— — .
— —
__ _*-
N/A —
E E
_ _
~ ~
— —
_ —
.,. __
_._ T,^^
— _ —
— . J-.H-
— LEFT EXHAUST
— 190 3-70 2214
- 320 4.20 1542
- 430 9.00 64
—
—
_
__
—
—
_•
—
410
175
3!
125
210
170
105
210
165
100
9.60 48
3.60 2140
3.70 1816
§.00 79
§.60 54
3.00 2787
3,00 196S
0.18 317
0*50 ITO
2i85 2214
0.15 348
0.36 108
02 HC CO NOX 02
__
__
»
—
—
^ _
—
-^ar
—
— _^
—
__„.
—
—J
—
—
-*_
—
— _
—
...
—
— •
—
_
—
_
— .
_-
—
_
—
__
—
—
^^
—
_
.—
__
oTs
0.5
1.5
0.7
0.5
1:1
0-8
0.6
2.4
OM
.7
0.5
2.5
_ „
__
^_
«
_
«.»
*™~
_
—
—
_M-
.,_
—
_^—
— —
-TT
—
-,.—
—
_-
_
—
_—
_„
-.
—
— »
_-
—
"™*
—
—
—
_
~
__
•—
—
~
—
__
—
"—
~"~
__
—
N/A
— J-,_J_ ,_. -,
w_ -.-. - —
•W— 1. ^__^, — _
— — —
_ •-„, -•
_._ •.» _
*— ... ...
— •»«. ...
— — —
., „ w/*
... •..«. — —
mj^ — — ^ ltll _
— — —
_^ . _
— — — —
_ — _
^^ .— _• III-—
— — _
-_ J, ^^^ „_
— — —
„..
~_ __* ._
— — ~ —
« _ _
- T ^_
_ — _
— _. _
_ « —
__ ~ _
_ ~_ —
_ — —
N/A
_ — __
_ — —
_t _.
— — —
— ___ —
— — —
~~ j ' - ~ *"
_ _^ __
~ — —
N/A
_ _ —
Z ~ -
~ — —
— — —
™~* •Tl'~lr ^*"
— ~"~ ~~
~™ "^ ""*
__ — —
H — —
FKDBRAL THREE MODE TEST EMISSION RESULTS ARE: HC - PPM/HEX, co - j, UNCORRBCTED NOX - PPM
N-59
-------
VEH
NO. YEAR MAKE MODL CID
APPENDIX N.CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST EMISSION RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
H.P. — RIGHT EXHAUST SYSTEM
3GNPH 50MPH HC CO NOX 02 HC CO NOX 02
LEFT EXHAUST SYSTEM
HC CO NOX 02 HC CO NOX 02
111 1973 FORD PINT 122
BEFORE HTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
112 1973 FORD TORI 351
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
113 1973 FORD MAVE 302
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MICE
REPLICATE
111 1973 FORD COST 351
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
115 1973 FORD LTD 100
BEFORE MtCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
( 9) (21)
50 MPH
- RIGHT
MPH
MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
EXHAUST -
343 0.
N/A —
N/A
N/A —
N/A
N/A —
l»50
430
290
160
4'
880 159 0.7
3 00 1742 0 6
0.80 296 0.8
1.25 81
.00 1
1
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST EMISSION RESULTS ARE: HC - PPM/HEX, CO - %, UNCORRECTED NOX - PPM
N-fiO
-------
APPENDIX N.CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST EMISSION RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
NO. YEAR MAKE
116 1973 MERC
117 1973 OLDS
118 1973 OLDS
mi 073 or vu
lyij rUXM
*
120 1973 PLYM
.
MODL CID
MONR 400
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
98 455
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
CUTL 350
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
o
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
DUST 225
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
SOMPH'SOMPH
MO (31}
\ I7/ \ J 1 /
50 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
(1C) (31)
\ 1 J f \J'f
50 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
35 MPH
IDLE CD)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
(15) (3D
50 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
IDLE (N)
^ . . .
50 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
JDLE (Jo?
IDLE (N)
(12) (26)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE CD)
IDLE (N)
LMPH
MPH
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
TRIE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
— — — " nxuni EUUIHUOI oxoiui — — —
HC CO NOX 02 HC CO NOX
DTP1TP EnniMIOT
— nJ.unl cJulAUol —
130 1.50 532 0.6
240 1.50 1567 0.8
21S 3.05 89 0.4
178 2.90 58 0.4
128 1.50 593 0.5
255 1.25 1493 0.7
225 3.20 96 0.4
185 3.30 64 0.3
160 1.70 624 0.6
270 1.90 1169 0.8
185 1.25 123 1.0
120 1.30 68 0.8
180 1.90 460 0.6
280 1.60 1095 0.7
190 1.10 113 0.5
150 1.20 66 1.0
- RIGHT EXHAUST -
25 0.30 696 0.8
75 1.05 542 0.5
55 0.20 121 1.9
40 0.45 63 1.4
35 0.40 737 0.7
95 1.20 470 0.4
60 0.18 116 1.9
50 0.40 71 1.4
60 0.80 716 0.6
115 1.60 409 0.3
90 0.20 106 2.0
110 0.60 60 1.3
70 1.20 706 0.4
130 2.30 337 0.3
105 0.35 101 1.1
95 1.10 64 0,9
N/A
— — — — ——
__ __ __
.»_ „ _ _
_ — _ __
__ ___ . —
__ « «— -.„
— - — — —
— — — . —
_
__ — — —
— — —
BTPHT PYH ATTEST
— tuuni &AHAUDI —
190 4.30 849 0.5
270 2.40 1244 0.5
300 8.00 61 0.9
250 8.40 50 0.7
215 4.60 829 0.4
230 2.70 1045 0.5
290 7.80 62 0.8
250 8.40 48 0.6
215 4.30 995 0.7
220 2.30 1045 0.7
170 0.90 101 1.0
115 1.40 68 0.9
190 3.40 1294 0.5
200 2.20 119{j 0.6
100 o'.go 66 ol9
N/A
_ — — — .
— — — —
__ ___ __
•_ — _ — —
E E E E
_ _ — _
___ __ ___
_ _ — _
— _ __ ___ __
—
__
„_
_
—
__
—
__
™*
—
—
—
__
__
__
—
_
—
—
—
- T.
170
180
180
195
205
180
205
245
150
95
200
275
150
110
—
„
— -
_
~ ~
—
~
—
—
_—
—
—
—
— _
—
___
—
__
•I/* _
__ ., _,
— — —
,- _^_
— —
~_ ••—
™"" ~™~
— —
,, U/A _,-
__ — __
— _ __
« ___
— —
_ ___
— -
— —
—
02
~
^^
_^
—
—
_^
—
_^ .
"^
—
—
—
__
—
_ _
—
_ _
,^_
—
~
HC
—
__
__
—
__
__
__
—
—
—
—
—
« _
^ _
_,„
~
» _
«*
—
—
P. COMPOSITE -
5.00 266 4.1 —
2.80 286
2.00 84
3.20 60
5.80 106
4.00 101
3-20 70
3.80 62
2.20 1020
1.00 104g
0.20 88
0.25 55
2.50 962
1.30 911
0.20 106
0.20 60
>i /A
_ -_
— —
_ — «_
_ —
_— .
__ __
— —
__ _ _ _
— —
— —
— N/A —
_ —
v_ —
_ — —
_,_ _„„
_ —
^^ ^^^
— —
— —
1'?
\'.2
3.2
2.9
2.6
2.6
0 7
0'.8
2.2
1 »9
0.6
0.7
1.9
2.5
—
__
—
«.
—
__
—
~~
««
_ _
—
-
—
—
™-
«—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
— .
"™—"
—
»*.
.H>
—
~*
• ••••• UEiT A
CO NOX
.__ H/fl ...
__ -— —
__ -— -
— — -
__ — _
__ ___
—
__ „__
_ —
_ —
.
__ —
— —
__ —
— —
«_ __
Z ~
... — .-„
— — ,•
— — •
N/A —
— — —
•. •••
.«, rni-ma
—
"""* — — -
— ___
— ' — **
_— . ~™
«_ ™
— ——
„ — _
~ ~
— —
_^ J-"
—
__ ._—
_— —
— _!••
— —
— _LEFT_pHAyST
—
~~
—
— —
_
—
—
—
115
210
3^0
f§S
130
M
ii
200
135
145
190
270
170
1.90 3105
*:8 l8ii
1.85 48
1 . 50 5375
0.35 5275
3.40 202
0.74 121
1.80 2389
0.65 2239
2.00 116
1.90 §3
2.30 1567
0.90 460
4.20 14
3.40 11
02 HC CO NOX 02
—
__
__
__
—
__
—
—
—
—
—
__
—
_
__
—
•_
««.
— «
—
—
__
~
—
—
~
— .
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
0.9
l!4
1.3
1 .0
2.0
1.5
1.5
0.9
1.5
2.1
1.5
0.8
1.4
1.9
1.2
—
_,_
^^
__
_,_
—
_,_u
^^
—
—
—
_
^
_«
—
„,_
—
~—
—
~
— ,
—
—
™*
—
—
^_
~
-*.
—
—
—
-
-™
rl
«.
—
—
—
"^
—
^^
—
—
„
—
~~
—
—
—
—
—
N /A
— --• —
M— a ^^
— --._.- _
_— — __
— - — - -__
_ — _
— •— - »»
— — —
— — —
N/A •
— — —
__ _-
_ _ ^ _
_ _ _
— — —
J— — ^—
_
« ^__ __
__ „__ __
— — — — -
— — ~ —
— N/lr~z
— — - —
— . ___ _
— mi— —
—^ ^H—
"~" •— — —
W -„, _
~ n ~
— . — _ — ,
— »— __
*~* —"~ —
— •— —
__ ... —
__
— — *— —
Z " -
_ — _
— — —
~ ~ ~
— — —
~ ~ —
•*• ~L~'~ ~~
N/A
__ -__- —
— -_L_- —
— — —
^"~ ~™"~ ^*"
_ —
__ _- 1 _«
« — — —
__ w_
_ —
FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST EMISSION RESULTS ARE: HC - PPM/HEX, CO - %, UNCORRECTED NOX - PPM
N-61
-------
APPENDIX N.CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST EMISSION RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
VEH
NO. YEAR MAKE MODL CID
CO
DENVER
RIGHT EXHAUST SYSTEM
NOX 02 HC CO NOX
02
HC
LEFT EXHAUST SYSTEM
CO NOX 02 HC CO
NOX 02
121 1973 PONT CATA 400
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
122 1973 PONT LEMA 350
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
123 1973 DATS TRUC 97
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
124 1973 OPEL MANT 116
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
125 1973 TOYO CORO 97
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
(15) (3D
50 MPH
" MPH
(D)
IDLE (N)
0 MPH
MPH
( 9) (21)
50 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
N/A
- T.P. COMPOSITE -
0.30 1667 1.6
N/A —
N/A —
N/A
— N/A
N/A
— LEFT EXHAUST —
430 3.50 1003 0.7
360 1.00 511 1.3
N/A —
—
—
__
E
—
—
—
E
- RIGHT I
205 4.40
400 4.80
520
215
370
560
190
Too
190
300
10.00
4.40
4.60
loToo
3.80
4 20
}:B
3.20
—
3HAUS
1i?l
18
1144
552
~~16
1045
"lo
1244
532
—
—
__
—
oTa
0.7
TTg
0.7
0.7
iTo
U
i-i
1.0
— — — —
— —
— — — —
__ E ~ =
, U/A
__ _ — _
— — — —
1300
450
650
490
1580
415
370
1360
0.50
i .10
5770
3.50
3.10
(K85
3.40
1.95
68
Q41
624
~~75
266
116
~~17
4^
1.00 ~~72
U/A
2.7
~8
8:1
1:1
0.9
2.0
—
—
—
—
—
—
E
~
—
—
— — — —
_ _ — _
~ — — —
_ _ — _
"/» ...
^ , — _
__ _ — ~
— — — —
_ _ — —
o
2.80 66
— N/A
1 •> -- __ __ ______
i fj —_ __ ___ __ __ ....
N/A
— LEFT
170 5.30 4"60" 1.6
N/A
_ __ — _ 170 1.8
— ~ I_ — 280 5.50
_ _ — __ 160 4.40
__ _ — _ 170 2.00
__ ~ — Z 250 47-0
— — — — 250 3.80 1
__ __ — _ 220 1.10 T
__ Q»TC
_ _ _ 2*45
— — — 220
819
0.40
70
1.7
52 1.4
•93 1.7
125 ^.9
57 1.6
0.8
1.1
TA
i.o
1.3
~ 320 1.30 54 2.0 — —
FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST EMISSION RESULTS ARE: HC - PPM/HEX, CO - %, UNCORHECTED NOX - PPM
H-62
-------
APPENDIX N.CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL THHEE MODE TEST EMISSION RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
von
NO. YEAR
126 1973
197 1Q7Q
lt( tyf j
375 1973
377 1973
380 1973
MAKE MODL CID
VOUC KOMB 103
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
irni v cpnfl Q7
VULA Oal/fi 7 /
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
DODG CHAR 318
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
FORD PINT 122
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
FORD THND 460
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MICE
REPLICATE
30MPH 50MPH
(12) (26)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
I n\ (?t\
\ y/ \c 17
50 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
(12) (26)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
(12) (26)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
IDLE CD/
IDLE (N)
(18) (36)
50 MPH
rnr p /^ i
IDLc »^c
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
LMPH
MPH
(D)
IDLE (N)
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
HC CO NOX 02 HC CO NOX
- RIGHT EXHAUST -
160 5.50 839 2.5
170 1.40 1343 4.0
w » •I-T.J — —
60 2.00 64 4.5
120 4.50 995 2.7
140 1.20 1095 4.1
H « ••— «
462 2.00 40 4.3
100 3.20 1169 2.7
110 0.60 604 4.5
"SO o7?5 ~146 i72
85 2.60 1070 J.O
100 0.70 1095 4.5
__ — _!_• w
35 0.75 136 5.1
H//I _ .
__ __ __
__ _• __— «.
— — —
w«. _• — —
— — —
«• , — •.- ««
— __ — —
:: E E E
„ _ _ —
_. __ — •• _ _
__ _• — _
- RIGHT EXHAUST -
220 4.00 737 0.6
290 2.40 665 0.6
340 6.60 54 1.0
280 6.00 48 0.9
235 4.00 757 0.6
310 2.60 737 0.6
290 liOQ 48 Q\9
210 4.10 675 0.5
280 3.00 808 0.4
185 1.60 80 0.7
120 1.20 57 0.7
230 4.80 532 0.5
310 3.30 798 0.5
270 1.60 90 0.7
120 1.10 52 0.6
- RIGHT EXHAUST -
220 6.20 1003 0.6
390 8.00 207 0.4
290 ibToO ~~49 0~-3
180 5.30 1219 0.6
345 8.10 232 0.4
260 10.00 53 0.3
290 6.50 1020 0.6
380 3 50 921 0 6
^60 5735 63 0.9
290 6.20 1020 0.6
490 8.40 266 0.5
w — . •— —
170 0.70 57 0.6
u/A
"™ ~"~ ~*~ ™~
— "" ~~ — ""~
— —
_» « — —
M « — — —
» M --"I- —
« — — - —
— — — —"•" ~—
» «. «— —
— — ~ —
— — — —
_^_^
m^
_
j^^
—
___
—
—
™ ' "
— _
—
— T
150"
250
?75
260
-.«
185
210
215
220
240
300
_«
260
—
—
— .
«
__
__
— .
__
— .
—
_._
__
^^f
—
_
—
~
__
—
—
—
—
* ™
•M.
W
— —
—
— —
— ~
N/A —
__ •» —
— __^,
— —
_«_
-«_ — ••
__ —
— —
_ —
__
- _^_
—
02
—
__
__
H
__
,_
—
—
^™
—
M
—
HC
::
__
_
_.
__
__
—
—
—
__
««
—
2.20 2314 0.6 —
2.40 1592
_» _v
6.00 79
4.40 1443
2.30 1244
~~ — »
6.20 76
3.80 2090
2.00 1493
4720 ~~66
2.80 2239
1.70 1592
.. -— •
4.60 70
M/A
__ ___.
_ ..-•
"*~ «— .
— MJ._
— _ ——
__ — _
— _
— — _
— —
11 /A
__ — — _
—
—
— —
« — -
^— ^^—
«_ _—-
_ ___
M/fl «-
—
__ _—
*""* "*— ^
» _••
—
^MM *"~
_
w— __«
« . — 1—
« ' — ~~
0.5
_,-
0.3
0.7
0.5
••
0.3
0.5
0.6
o7s
0.5
0.5
_«
0.3
—
—
_
^^
__
—
— _
—
—
—
__
~™
^^
—
—
—
~ ~
—
—
—
—
—
*~~
~"
—
~~
—
~~
""**
^^
_
v_
—
»
—
_-
—
—
—
__
—
—
—
— •
™"—
__
— •
-»
—
—
—
_ _
"*™
—
—
™
__
—
— —
—
—
™~
—
~~
—
""—
™~
~~
— — •• LiBT J.
CO NOX
N/A —
— — ~—
__ «_ «
_ —
__
__ ___
w_
— —
— —
_ —
__ ___
_ •, •
— —
M/4 _
_ ___
_ ~*~
__
.. — .—
_„ -_
— — -
—
— . _—
» •— •
.__- W/fl ^T
— -—
— . •••
_ —
— . —
__
— _ .»
__ ~
— — _
_ —
H/a
~~ -
— —
_ —
—
__ »
^ _
— — —
~ ••
— —
N/A
^M m ^
_ •-
_ —
__
_ —
--
CWUUtUiJA *Jl*JLCfl ~ — •-— •— •— .
02 HC CO NOX a
—
_
__
__
__
««
—
—
—
—
__
—
^_
—
— •
—
_
—
-
—
—
—
««
—
—
—
~_
—
_
—
—
—
—
—
—
~*~
"
—
—
— .
_
— ~
— ~
"~
—
_—
^^
^"~
—
___
—
_
—
"•"
_w
—
— .
—
«v
—
—
—
—
«
—
__
—
«_
—
«.
—
_ _
—
—
—
«
—
—
—
—
z
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
w
—
~~
"^
"" ~
- T
170
220
700
1400
190
500
800
175
105
1TO
300
N/A
— — . —
— _ ._. _
— ... _
— . — — ,
— _
_ _».. —
„
— -
— *
_- ___ _
— _«_ «
— -
_ __ H/A
_- _
— — —V— —
_ — _
» • «.
— —
—w — V— M
— ___ _
— -
— —
— •> — » — .
_
— N/A --
_ — —
_ i «
~ — ~
— — —
_ — _ —
«_ »_ —
— _ __ — .
— — —
— — -
~ ~ -
_ — _
_ — _
_ — _
.•m — — -. »—
— —
M_ BM_ — —
« _« —
*^~ ™" ""*
.P. COMPOSITE -
4.60 191 0.
5.20 151 0.
9.40 24 0.'
10.00 12 1.
460 166 o'i
9.*20 22 O'.
10.00 12 0.'
4.20 491 0.-
4.30 176 O.j
0.15 106 2.)
0.17 48 2.1
4.30 491 0.;
3.80 212 0.
0.14 111 3-1
0 12 54 2.8
THREE MODE TEST EMISSION RESULTS ARE: HC - PPM/HEX, CO - %, UNCORHECTED NOX - PPM
N-63
-------
VEH
NO. YEAR MAKE
APPENDIX N.CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST EMISSION RESULTS !
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
H.P. — RIGHT EXHAUST SXSTEM LEFT EXHAUST SXSTEM
MODL CID 30MPH 50MPH HC CO NOX 02 HC CO NOX 02 HC CO NOX 02 HC CO
NOX 02
782 1973 AMMO
788 1973 CADI
790 1973 CHEV
791 1973 CHEV
HORN 304
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
DEVI 172
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MICE
REPLICATE
VEGA 140
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
VEGA 140
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
795 1973 CHEV
(12) (26)
50 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
(18) (36)
50
LMPH
MPH
(D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
" MPH
IDLE
( 9) (21)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
IDLE (N
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
- ?H
(D)
IDLE (N)
( 9) (21)
50 MPH
N/A
N/A
- RIGHT EXHAUST -
155 3.20
275 3.60
N/A
CD) 1300
(N) 2000
N/A
N/A
N/A
__ *JI
I__ ___~Z 4{
NOVA 307
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MICE
REPLICATE
N/A
N/A
IDLE (D
IDLE (N
— LEFT EXHAUST —
— LEFT EXHAUST ~
150
270
1.75
3-50
0.3
0,
2000 10.00
180 2.00
520 3.60
2000 ibToo
593
~52
120
240
280
120
240
1.30 839
2.30 1194
T.50 ~~78
4.20 911
2.40 1294
0.71 1144 0.3
1 00 1194 0.3
0.40 286 0.1
0.46 106 0.3
.._ - _
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
C _^ —<_ __^ _^
0
0^5 _ _
57? — —
0.2 — —
0.3 — -
0.4 — —
— 270 1.60 78 0.4 —
— LEFT EXHAUST
— 40 1.05
N/A
N/A
FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST EMISSION RESULTS ARE: HC - PPM/HEX, CO - %, UNCORRECTED NOX - PPM
N-64
-------
APPENDIX N.CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST EMISSION RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VCO1
NO.
flnfl
ouo
Rno
009
810
811
812
YEAR MAKE MODL CID 30HPH'50MPH
1Q73 rHTJV ^TAU Jl.
_„ __ — _
— -, — — —
_-» — .— —
___> M— — ^— ^^
_. __ — —
— — — —
~ ~ m ~
_«. «>« — w-
— — ~ —
.. — -— —
— • "*™ — —
_____ N/A_----
_ _ — _
__ _ — —
— — — —
__ _ — _
__ _
_ __ - - 1- —
— — — —
— "•" ~~~ ~~
aimm_ u /* m,..
__ ~- .-- —
— — — " ~~
••• • "•" ^-»*» ^^
Z — — —
— _ — —
__ ___ _
— — — —
— ——---•——— LtCtT A uuuiWfcjA uj.h»j.fi« — — — —
HC CO NOX 02 HC CO NOX 02
«/* M/« _
__ _ — _ _ — _ —
zzmz ~ ~ ~~ ~
— — — — — — __ —
_ _ _ _v - ___ _
__ _ __ — _ __ __ —
— — _ — — — —
— — — — — — — —
_-» _ !___ -•— -»*" *"** -»-*—
_ -.-, TTT^ _*>. — -J-
__ _ _ — — — —
— _ « _— — — — —
— Jjml _.._ _„ _ _ -.a-,- _-.
.•• _ II. «• — 11— """ """ J^ ™' ~L~
— _«. « — — — — — — —
— _ —_ — — -— — —
~_ __ — _-. — — — —
— — — — — — — —
_ — — - — — — —
.„ « _— — — «— — —
— -. — -— — — «— — — ~
—
_ — _ — - — — — - —
— «_ *__ — — — — — —
n n in _ __-_ — —
•*^ _^ -«•—— •-*• ~~ **^ ^-^«- —
ir~z N/__I~TI IT~II M/li~ii
« «. •— — • — — •- - r ~—
— — — — — — — - —
MM _ -*™1" •""" ~~ "*~ ~~"" *~~
~ ~ ~ — Z_ — _
_ — ___ _ — — — - —
— — — — — — — —
— ~ ~ — — — — —
_ _ —
_____ N/A_— - - -— - N/A_-— -
__ __ - ~* •" j~ —_— •-.
•_ ~^ ~" ^~~ ^^ ™*~
__ . _ ___
— _ — — — — — —
__ — — _ — — —
_
_ — — - _____ — - —
_._ — — _ — — —
FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST EMISSION RESULTS ARE: HC - PPM/HEX, CO - %, ONCORRECTED NOX - PPM
H-65
-------
APPENDIX N.CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST EMISSION RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
H.P.
NO. YEAR MAKE MODL CID 30MPH 50MPH HC CO
RIGHT EXHAUST SYSTEM -
NOX 02 HC CO NOX 02
HC
LEFT EXHAUST SYSTEM
CO NOX 02 HC CO
NOX 02
813 1973 DODG CHAH 100
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
814 1973 DODG DART 318
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
820 1973 FORD HAVE 250
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
821 1973 FORD HAVE 302
BEFORE MICE
REPLICATE
AFTER MICE
REPLICATE
822 1973 FORD MAVE 250
BEFORE MICE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
(15) (31)
N/A
- T.P.
(12) (26)
50 MPH
(12) (26)
50 MPH
- MPH
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
COMPOSITE -
80 1453 0.7
1.0
N/A
N/A
N/A
- RIGHT EXHAUST -
195 3.40 1567 0.4
240 4.00 307 0.3
0.4
IDLE
50 MPH
30
IDLE (D
IDLE (N
(12) (26)
50 MPH
IDLE (D
IDLE (N
50
N/A
N/A
N/A
— LEFT EXHAUST —
,0 4.00 542 0.8
40 2.70 460 0.9
— 44 1.3
0.9
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST EMISSION RESULTS ARE: HC - PPM/HEX, CO - %, UNCORRBCTED NOX - PPM
H-66
-------
APPENDIX N.CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST EMISSION RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO.
823
824
826
828
uco
831
YEAR MAKE MODL CID
1973 FORD MUST 302
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
1973 FORD MAVE 302
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
1973 FORD LTD 429
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
1073 POBH THRT 3^1
*y t j K\jmj miu yj i
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
1973 MERC COME 250
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
— H.P. —
30MPH 50MPH
(12) (26)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
(12) (26)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
T_T_,__ CD)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
MB) (^6)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
IDLE CD)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
Ms) (31)
50 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 I^H
TTff. B Q)T
IDLE (N)
(12) (26)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE p)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
RIGHT EXHAUST SYSTH
HC CO NOX 02 HC CO
- RIGHT EXHAUST -
290 2.90 655 0.7
505 2.70 121 0.6
1120 8.60 38 1.0
1180 8.40 29 1.2
300 2.90 716 0.6
525 3.00 161 0.6
1140 8.80 45 1.0
1180 8.50 30 1.2
460 8.20 126 0.7
410 6.80 80 0.6
980 4.00 60 1.2
1000 5.00 48 1.2
410 7.40 131 0.7
440 8.00 66 0.6
980 4.00 60 1.4
960 4.40 48 1.5
- RIGHT EXHAUST -
230 3.20 941 0.4
220 2.70 409 0.3
285 5*90 5o 0 3
255 o 20 46 0*3
230 3i 10 1003 o!5
215 2.80 409 0.5
330 6.oO 54 0.3
275 6.70 48 o'.3
240 3.40 470 0.6
260 3.80 237 0.4
310 4.40 68 0.3
180 5.00 55 0.2
250 3.40 491 0.6
260 l80 232 0.4
290 4.20 78 0.3
170 5.20 57 0.2
_i PTRHT KX HAHST —
™ luuni. CAnAUOA
160 2.00 1617 0.8
140 2.00 491 0.6
300 6.80 63 0.5
220 7 00 49 05
160 2.20 1468 0.8
130 2.30 491 0.6
290 6.40 66 0.5
200 6.80 52 0.5
40 0.50 1294 0.7
40 0.50 450 0.5
90 0.05 74 4.1
190 0.10 38 4.9
40 0.50 1592 0.7
40 0.50 552 0.5
80 0.05 62 4.3
220 0.10 38 5.0
PTfiHT PYUAnST
— luuni uuiAUMi ~
120 1.25 1343 0.8
165 1.40 73? 0.5
290 6.20 76 0.3
250 6.50 58 0.3
120 1.50 1119 0.7
160 1.80 593 0.4
290 6.80 72 0.3
320 6.40 68 0.3
180 2.20 1368 0.8
275 2 30 1045 0.5
750 1.00 111 0.4
150- 1.30 61 0.3
205 2.60 1269 0.8
300 2.90 962 0.4
215 1.70 94 0.4
150 1.70 62 0.3
- RIGHT EXHAUST -
230 4.40 1368 0.4
360 1'io 42 O'l
340 B'.OO 36 Q~.3
240 4.25 1542 0.4
230 5.20 307 0.3
355 8.20 45 0.3
300 7.80 43 0.3
180 4.10 1617 0.4
180 5.70 296 0.3
180 2.30 98 0.3
90 1.60 72 0.4
205 4.50 1269 0.4
210 6.20 219 0.3
180 2.70 95 0.2
115 2.20 65 0.3
—
__
_
_
_—
—
—
__
— M
_^__.
—
—
_._
__
__
__
__
—
—
__
—
— —
—
_
—
—
_
_
__
z
__
__
—
__
_
__
_
—
_
—
—
—
«
^^
—
—
—
~
»
__
—
_»
—
—
— -
—
—
—
_^
__
^_
^—
—
—
__
— ^
—
_»
—
—
^,_
._„
__
__
„_
—
—
__
—
—
—
—
—
..
__
—
—
..
—
_.
._
—
_
—
_
_
—
—
=
__>
__
—
—
—
—
—
__
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
^
NOX 02
N/A
—
___ __
— ,,— — ^
mi_ j_ — —
— — — — m
— _
— —
— _,„ __
__^^ __
—
— —— __
— _
N/»
_
— — „ — —
— .mt^ — —
^_M —
___ — _
___ «_
_
_
ajljt _ _
—
—
H/A
—
- .__
_—_ «.
— —
—
__ _ ^M
„• __
___ —
~ Z
.... —
___ —
— —
N/A _-.._
__- __
_— —
___ ~
—
_^,. _„
„_ _.»
—
—
—
— •• —
,,_ __
—
N/A
— «_>
—— ~~
—
™~-™ "^ *
_— —
— . —
«, — .
_ —
... —
— —
— —
— —
LET!
HC CO NQX
H/A
— , -. „._
— ^ _J — _ IBI
— — «
_» — — .
_ — —
— _ —
« __> -
^_ r
— — —
— — — ^ — ^^
__ — —
__ ^^ ___
__ — ___
__ ^^ ___
_« __. ___
__ i. . ___
— — —
_ _ —
^^ ^— — — ^
__ — ___>
— — — — -
..... N/A
,,_ _^ m
— — ___
— -
__ — ...
— — __-_
— — _
Z Z ~
— — — _
— — — _
— — —
...... N/A
_— — •___
— — _
— — —
— — _
.»_ _«. »
« — —
— —
— —
_ _
__ — — ___
__ __ •-•
— —
N/A —
« — —
„ __ _„_
_ —
Z — —
— — —
_— — —
— — — —
— _ — —
— ™ "— ~
— — "• — —
— — —
__ — —
' EXHAUST S
02 HC
—
_
—
~
_^
^^
—
—
~
^—
__
M_
_
__
—
—
__
—
~~
—
__
_
—
—
.__
—
z
_
—
—
..
—
_—
—
...
...
—
—
—
—
— —
—
—
z
__.
—
—
~~
—
_
""
~™
•^
—
_
__^
___
—
—
— ^_
___
—
^ _
—
—
_H—
^^
_ _.
__
_ _
—
—
^J_
—
—
—
__
__
—
—
__
—
_-
—
_-
__
—
__
__
—
—
—
_
—
—
—
—
— —
—
—
—
—
— —
—
—
"•""
~~'
~~
™* ™ *
™*™*
^^
FGVBU
CO NOX
U/A
Z - -~
— ,.-
— —
— —
— ^ ^^__
— —
— ....
— —
H/A
— — -—
— —
^— _,__,__.
« — _
_>_ ...
_ —
_ —
__
_ —
_ ».»
N/4
_
_
__ ....
— —
—
.. .«
— -_
~ ~
— _
—
—
, H/A .. ,
... .._
— —
—
_ _
.. ...
._
— — —
_
_
— — — —
— — — —
— — — —
N/A —
_ _. ..
. .^^
—
-_
— —
__ —
_ -—
™~ —
—
~~
02
—
~
—
~
—
—
—
__
_«
__
__
««_
—
—
—
—
—
__
—
—
_
..
—
^^
_
-M.
—
_
—
—
—
—
—
..—
—
—
—
~~
•_
^^
~~
—
._.
~
—
THREE MODE TEST EMISSION RESULTS ARE: HC - PPM/HEX, CO - %, UNCOHRECTED NOX - PPM
N-67
-------
APPENDIX N.CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST EMISSION RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
VEH
NO. YEAR MAKE MODL
CID
H.P. —
30MPH 50NPH
DENVER
RIGHT EXHAUST SYSTEM
LEFT EXHAUST SYSTEM
HC CO NOX 02 HC CO NOX 02 HC CO NOX 02 HC CO NOX 02
835 1973 OLDS CUTL 350
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MICE
REPLICATE
837 1973 OLDS CUTL 350
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
839 1973 PLYM DUST 225
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
30 U
IDLE (N.
REPLICATE 50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
8110 1973 PLYM DUST 318 (12) (26)
BEFORE MTCE 50
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
842 1973 PLYM SATE 318
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
N/A
50 MPH
0 MPH
(D)
IDLE (N)
0 MPH
.20
.00
110 1.30
110 2.40
120 4.00
1542
0
0.20
0.50
0.90 134
1.80 69
0.20
0.50
2.00 1294
1.50 1841
1.70
1.10
1.70 1
1.30 1742
0.70 181
1.20 90
MPH
MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
IDLE (N)
(15) (3D
50 MPH
EXHAUST -
.00 101 0.5
82 0.6
0.8
0.9
0.6
0.6
0.9
N/A
N/A
N/A
1.0 — —
- RIGHT EXHAUST -
7.80 266 1.0
8.60 217 " ~
N/A
N/A
N/A
FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST EMISSION RESULTS ARE: HC - PPM/HEX, CO - %, UNCORRECTED NOX - PPM
K-68
-------
VEH
NO. YEAR
MAKE MODL CID
APPENDIX N.CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST EMISSION RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
_- H.p. _ RIGHT EXHAUST SYSTEM LEFT EXHAUST SYSTEM
30MPH 50MPH HC CO NOX 02 HC CO NOX 02 HC CO NOX 02 HC CO NOX 02
843 1973
844 1973
845 1973
846 1973
849 1973
PLYM FRY3 360
BEFORE MICE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
PONT VENT 350
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
PONT LENA 350
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
PONT LEMA 350
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
PONT STAW 400
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
IDLE (N)
(12) (26)
50 MPH
MPH
(15) (31)
50 MPH
50 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
IDLE (N)
(1?) 1g
$
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
MPH
„ MPH
IDLE (D)
(N)
(18) (36)
50 MPH
- RIGHT EXHAUST - N/A
160 3.00 2190 0.8 — — —
210
N/A —
N/A —
1542
290 7.00 60
" 8.40 60
.1 — —
.0 — —
.1
260
270 7.00 55
270 7.20 55 0.6
2.80 1941
1.80 14Q3
1.80 66
2.40
3.50 21.
1.70 1219
4.50 70
3.50
- RIGHT EXHAUST -
80
2.70 2115
5.20 941
7.40 60
7.10 51
2.20 1841
4.00 1095
2.00 90
3.20 50
3.40 1468
4.80 655
3.60 69
3.40 50
- RIGHT EXHAUST -
280 10.00 131 0.4
240 3.40 7' ~
610 ~
720 9.7Q 34 0.5
0.4
0.4
0.5
3.40
7.40
- 9.70
270 10.00
245 * -
9.
220
fci
2.40
1.60
0.20 212 6.2
O.JO 176 7.8
2.40 1144 0.4
1.80 995 0.7
0.20 266 5.6
0.30 121 7.0
- RIGHT EXHAUST -
20
12
510
0.
1.60
5.30
5.80
0.50
1.10 1742
5.00 42
5.20 26
1.00 1990
2 00 1343
0.30 511
0.70 409
1.30 1941
2.40 1294
0.40 470
0.90
— N/A
0.6
0.4
0.5
0.9
1.0
0.5
0.4
0.7
N/A
N/A —
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A —
0.5 - —
0.4 — —
N/A --
N/A
— N/A
N/A —
_ LEFT
60 0.30
90 0.40
210
N/A
FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST EMISSION RESULTS ARE: HC - PPM/HEX, CO - %, UNCORRECTED NOX - PPM
N-69
-------
APPENDIX N.CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST EMISSION RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
VEH
H.P. —
NO. YEAR MAKE MODL CID 30MPH 50HPH HC CO NOX
DENVER
EXHAUST SYSTEM
02 HC CO NOX
LEFT
02 HC CO NOX 02
SYSTEM
HC CO
NOX 02
850 1973 DATS B610 108
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
851 1973 DATS 240Z 146
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
852 1973 BOND CIVI 71
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MICE
REPLICATE
855 1973 MS CONV 110
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
856 1973 PORS 914 102
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
( 9) (21)
50 MPH
30
._ MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
(D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
( 9) (21)
0
N/A —
N/A
MPH — —
- RIGHT .
1B °>:8
.
145 0.
N/A
130 3.60 42
110 0.45 1144
.90
__°
Too
- RIGHT EXHAUST -
300 10.00 593
200 3.60 1194
~ ~~80
280 1
220
270
190
210
420
190
210
3'.60 1244
4*790 ~~94
941
511
~~65
819
614
460 1.20 65
4.30
3.40
TTl5
5.80
3-30
0.2 —
0.3 - _
0.6 - -
oTe — —
0.2 — —
2_3 ~ ~
1 2 — —
o!2 — —
0.3 - -
N/A
N/A
— LEFT
— 290
840 9-00 17
150 2.50 1493
250 2.00 870
800 gToO ~~22
170 3.50 1003
160 1.60 491
310 JTOO ~~42
130 3.00 1194
160 1.40 593
~~ ~~ 10 ~~44
N/A
0.6 — —
0.5 — —
0.4 ~ ~
oTe — ~
bTs — ~
0.4 — —
—* — ~
oTs — —
1567 4.0 —
7fi7 il 7 __ ___ __ __
I w| ~ • I ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^
7fl 9 fift .13 1 Q __ — __ __ _._.
IU -. • UU *t J I • J ~-^ ^^ ~"~ ^^ ^*^ ^"^
150 0.62 1692 3.8 — — — ~ _ _
140 1.00 716 4.6 — — — — _ _
85 3.20 45 1.1 — — — — __ H
110 0.40 995 4.2 — — — — — —
85 0.50 470 4.7 — — — — — _
2?2 — — ~ — — —
640 — — —- —
_ _5J3 J_-5 ~ ~ ~ — — ~
3.80 ~46 1.7 — — — — — —
N/A —
— LEFT „
170 3.90 78
145 3.00 337
N/A ~
N/A —
N/A —
N/A
FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST EMISSION RESULTS ARE: HC - PPM/HEX, CO - %, UNCORRECTED NOX - PPM
M-70
-------
APPENDIX N.CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST EMISSION RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO.
857
860
863
864
076
YEAR MAKE MODL CID
1973 TOYO STAW 97
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
1973 SUBA STAW 83
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
1973 VOLK SEDA 97
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MICE
REPLICATE
1973 VOLV 142S 121
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
1972 AMMO GREM 258
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
— H.P. —
30MPH 50MPH
( 9) (21)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
LMPH
MPH
(D)
IDLE (N)
LMPH
MPH
(T>\
\vf
IDLE (N)
( 9) (21)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
XDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
( 9) (21)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
(12) (26)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
IDLE (N)
( 9) (21)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
TDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
LMPH
MPH
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
HC
—
__
—
—
—
—
—
. RTRH1
CO NOX
- N/A -
—— -...-
— — — —
— —
— __.
— __ _
— —
— —
r EXHA
02
—
_._
~—
—
_
—
~
~
- RIGHT EXHAUST -
230 7.20 176 0.4
210
__
460
230
190
__
400
'260
230
280
260
240
__
285
2.60 409
» ...
8.20 32
7.60 181
2.80 470
— — — __
9-00 26
8.00 266
3-50 532
4.00 ~~55
7.90 296
3.60 552
JiToO ~57
0.3
0.4
0.3
0.3
574
0.5
0.3
oTs
0.5
0.4
oTs
- RIGHT EXHAUST -
250 8.20 378 0.5
250 1.30 1393 0.4
620
220
230
iiTo
205
132
2000
210
145
2000
— __
— —
—
—
—
__
__
—
—
—
__
—
—
—
..
—
4.80 56
5.20 1020
0.80 1244
iTeo ~~s8
8.20 399
0.43 1244
0?62 "~74
8.10 399
0.18 1318
« — __
0.29 72
N/A —
— —
•_. _ __
— —
__ —
— ^ _^ _
— ...
—
— — —
—
N/A
.. —
— —
»
— —
__ —
__
— —
0.9
0.4
0.5
-------
APPENDIX N.CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST EMISSION RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
VEH H.P. —
NO. YEAR MAKE MODL CID 30MPH 50MPH HC CO
DENVER
RIGHT EXHAUST SYSTEM
NOX 02 HC CO NOX
02 HC CO
LEFT EXHAUST SYSTEM
NOX 02 HC CO
NOX 02
077 1972 BUIC RIVI l»55
BEFORE MICE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
078 1972 CADI DEVI 472
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
079 1972 CHEV VEGA 110
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
080 1972 CHEV MALI 350
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
081 1972 CHEV CHEL 350
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
(15) (3D
0 MPH
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50
(18) (36)
50 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
( 9) (21)
50 MPH
MPH
(D)
IDLE (N)
0 MPH
(12) (26)
50 MPH
MPH
MPH
IDLE
MPH
(12) (26)
50 MPH
N/A
- RIGHT EXHAUST -
N/A
- RIGHT .
180 1.60
4.50
3-90
- RIGHT EXHAUST -
105 0.60 1742 4.2
140 0.35 102$) 4.1
220 2.10 98 3-8
110 olbO 1866
150 0.17 1119
230 0.70 113
140 0.70 54
0.85 1468
0.40 849
1.10 97
Q'.T5 1244
0.30 614
O.L_
0.80
106
31
- T.P. COMPOSITE -
100 0.8
220 1.80 13
N/A
N/A —
220 5.
165 4.
100
210
255
31
1.10 2140
.00 1393
I:!
.20 41
220 5.80 28
100 0.90 2214 5.1 — — — — __ — _
205 2.50 " "
120 1.10
60 0.85
105 1.40 171
200 1.60 1:
130 1.30 1
70 1.10
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
5 *7 ,„ „„
2*9 —— •-
0.9 •- ••
£• 1 «•• ™"
l!7 — —
2.6 — —
2.1 — —
N/A
N/A
— LEFT EXHAUST ~
140 3.80 563 3.9
200 2.70 542 5.9
N/A —
3.00
— 80 1.35
70
150
160
~75
542
552
2.65
1.90
~70
2.75
2.10
1.70 40
— N/A
25 6.8
2
5
2.8
o y __ __
U/A
n/n -
N/A --
N/A
FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST EMISSION RESULTS ARE: HC - PPM/HEX, CO - *, UNCORRECTED NOX - PPM
N-72
-------
APPENDIX N.CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST EMISSION RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
VEH
NO. TEAR MAKE MODL CID
H.P. —
30MPH 50MPH
HC CO
DENVER
RIGHT EXHAUST
NOX 02 HC
CO NOX 02 HC CO
LEFT EXHAUST SYSTEM
NOX 02 HC CO NOX 02
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
083 1972 CHEV DffA 350
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
084 1972 CHEV BELA 400
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
085 1972 DODG COHO 318
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
086 1972 FORD PINT 122
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
MPH
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 HPH
IDLE D
IDLE (N)
(15) (3D
MPB
IDLE (N)
(12) (26)
50 MPH
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D
IDLE (N
50
IDLE (D)
00
- RIGHT EXHAUST -
170 1.75 1742 0.7
3.35 1.20 1518 0.6
780 10.00 28 0.5
840 10.00
165
" 10.00
11
1.60 1791
1.00 1443
160
270
|
10.00 27
1.50 1592
0.70 1219
0.80 239
0.90 71
1.60 1169
0.70 1045
0.80 242
0.90 75
0.6
1.1
1.1
0.7
0.7
1.0
!:!
1.2
N/A
MPH ~ —
- RIGHT EXHAUST -
180 2.20 1766 0.8
1.1
1.2
1.5
2.80 1468
1.30 1493
4.60 7J
.00 56
.40 57T
:» H!
- RIGHT EXHAUST -
120 7.60 1443 0.6
70 2.60 3085 1.1
9.20 42
7.90 1269
2.40 3484
2.6
0.7
1.0
700 9-90 40
'0 _
0 1592 0.5
& 1:1. ?Q?? g'5
140 3-20 63
1.1
0.5
.„ 5.90201. _
160 2.20 1567 0.
140 _TlO 66 1.3
N/A —
N/A —
- T.
170
P. COMPOSITE -
3.80 1443 0.6
0.90 1816
.50
N/A
N/A
N/A —
N/A
N/A —
N/A
N/A
N/A
THREE MODE TEST EMISSION RESULTS ARE: HC - PPM/HEX, CO - %, UNCORRECTED NOX - PPM
B-73
-------
VEH
NO. YEAR HAKE MODL CID
APPENDIX N.CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST EMISSION RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
H.P. — RIGHT EXHAUST SYSTEM LEFT EXHAUST SYSTEM
30MPH 50MPH HC CO NOX 02 HC CO NOX 02 HC CO NOX 02 HC CO NOX 02
087 1972 FORD GRNT 351
BEFORE MICE
REPLICATE
AFTER MICE
REPLICATE
088 1972 FORD HAVE 200
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MICE
REPLICATE
089 1972 FORD GALA 351
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
090 1972 FORD STAW 400
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
091 1972 MERC MONG 400
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
(12) (26)
50 MPH
IDLE
(.9) (21)
IDLE
- RIGHT
- RIGHT EXHAUST -
195 0.50 4081 1.1
" 1.80 2190 0.7
3.70 151
- RIGHT EXHAUST -
140 1.65 2190 0.7
195 1.40 1468 0.8
151
65
1.4
1.6
0.7
N/A
N/A —
N/A —
N/A
N/A
M/4
af n ~-a -^
N/A ~~™j»»™
N/A
N/A —
N/A —
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A —
1 7 — — —- — -t_ __ „, —_ , _ ,._•
FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST EMISSION RESULTS ARE: HC - PPM/HEX, CO - %, UNCORRECTED NOX - PPM
H-74
-------
APPENDIX N.CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST EMISSION RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VKH
NO.
092
093
094
095
nn£
09o
H.P. --
YEAR MAKE MODL CID 30MPH 50MPH
1972 OLDS CUTL 350
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
1972 PLYM VALI 225
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
1972 PLYM FURY 360
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MICE
REPLICATE
1972 PONT CATA 400
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
1972 PONT LEMA 350
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
(12) (26)
50 HPH
IDLE^D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
xDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
LMPH
MPH
(D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
(12) (26)
50 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
LMPH
(D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
jfB.^ CD)
IDLE (N)
50 HPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
(15) (3D
50 MPH
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
IDLE (of
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
(15) (3D
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
20LB $$
IDLE (N)
/ **%\ /»l£\
(12) (26)
50 MPH
QQ MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
HC
RIGHT EXHAUST SY
CO NOX 02 HC
- RIGHT EXHAUST -
130 1.40 1518 0.7
270
340
145
260
340
290
190
100
140
210
120
70
~
—
...
z
—
—
__
—
—
4.20 389 0.4
8.80 34 1.4
9.10 28 1.5
1.90 1318 0.5
4.70 §68 0.4
9.20 30 1.6
8.60 32 1.6
1.30 1169 3.0
2.10 450 3.4
0.95 89 4.3
1.30 56 3.8
2.00 900 3.3
l!50 tOI i',5
2.00 63 2.9
»/«
— — * — _
— __* __
__ ._ T __
__ __
« •-,• --
"**"" — .»- ~™
..
—
— ^
«-.
._
*•_
—
—
*».
—
— .
—
—
«*.
~H>
—
—
-*-»
—
- RIGHT EXHAUST -
180
k
i
180
245
90
100
170
240
100
80
3.60 1169 0.4
2.90 1119 0.5
9.00 43 0.8
9-20 35 0.7
2.80 1343 0.5
2.90 1169 0.5
8.90 43 0.9
9.10 32 0.8
3.10 2065 0.6
1.80 1742 0.7
0.30 84 1.9
0.55 66 1.6
2.80 1617 0.6
1.90 1617 0.7
0.30 89 1.7
0.45 66 1.7
- RIGHT EXHAUST -
140 0.70 1841 1.0
§20
650
140
290
700
600
135
280
loo
150
iis
680
__
__
_
™
—
«
„„
—
_ _
—
2.00 1169 0.9
4.40 111 1.6
4.60 48 1.3
0.80 149| 0.6
liso 45 i!s
1.30 1891 0.9
1 50 1244 0 8
2.30 307 1 .0
2.40 214 1.1
1.40 1841 0.8
1.70 1343 0.7
2.40 348 0.9
2.90 138 1.2
U/A
__, • -.— ..
w. ---. «»
^tm •.. m—
_ ._ —
_ — —
— — —
_ H.-L- —
~~* — —
_» .!.-.— —
— „ —
_ ..
—
—
»
..
—
—_
—
—
—
—
__
—
_
— .
~
—
_
— "
T
140
240
270
ft
270
275
280
180
190
220
270
170
160
STEM
CO NOX
— u/« __
— —
«— .•••
__ •——
— JII
.. Jllll...
__ —
— —
n ..-.-.
— —
— , •—
-» .—.
—
_,_ H/fl ._
__ -___
_ ••-
_ —
—
_ —
_ ---
™~ ™"~~
_
N/A —
— —
~ HI
_ —
_ _^,_
~ ~
_ —
— —
._
_ _
— —
H/4
— —
_ __
__ .««
«. .»«.
--
z ~
_ — —
__ ~*~
—
PorMDfVQTn
. UJHrUod.]
2.'bO 1642
3.60 106
4.20 68
1.75 1841
3.80 151§
3.70 108
4.00 78
2.30 1692
1.40 1393
0.15 53
0.30 57
2.60 1418
1.40 1468
0.15 95
0.20 58
02
m^~
— n
iW
—M.
•^
—
—
_„
—
..
—
—
—
—
— •
— ^
—
—
_ „,
«-«
«
__
—
— -
—
_ _,
—
__
__
__
—
_
—
_
— «
~
—
"-•
—
~~
—
Vi
1.1
1.1
0.8
0.7
0.9
1.0
0.9
0.7
0.9
4.5
2.1
Ol8
3-5
2.7
HC
^».
—
»
_«
__
~
—
_ _
_
__
—
-.
_—
™~
—
—
^^
^^
—
__
~
z
__
«
z
__
—
__
.«
—
__
—
—
— -
—
tm ^
—
—
—
—
—
__
„
—
—
—
—
—
—
, I PPT P¥H*I1
CO NOX 02
-.,._ H/4 ........
.
— •„„ —
^^ |— — ^ — ._
«.« »— • -•
«._ --ill. —
_ _
— —
— -•«- — _
—
«_ •j.j. «.
«~— -T_mrt ^_
—
u/»
„ — —
_— ._«. —
« «.« —
__ — _
— ~ —
-- — —
_„_ -,,_llll _
_W— . Ul «B^
__
N/A
— . •_
— — —
Z ~ —
— — —
_ --• «->
•— — — "—
_- — - _
„. __ _ —
_ ... _
-*. ... —
— . — . —
.... H/A
z z: z
_ _ —
__ •_ —
__ — _ —
«4 1 - «w
_« _*
_ ~ —
__ _
— — ~
H/i _____
_ — —
— •••' ~"
_ __- — -
— — —
__ «_— -_•
— — ~ ~~
— — —
— — —
Z E Z
_ _ — —
__ _— —
ST SYSTEM
HC CO NOX 02
__
—
__
__
__
^_
—
—
^^
~
—
- T
$
960
1290
550
165
260
185
170
155
255
in
«..
z
z
—
_
z
—
__
— _
~
—
_
I
~
—
—
__
—
__
~~
—
~~
—
—
—
^^
...
~~
__
"^
1J /•
_ __
— — __
Z '*"' Z
__ 3 _
— — —
_- — __
_
— — —
^^ _ mi_
— . _•!- — —
.P. COMPOSITE -
3.40 2090 0.8
5.00 941 0.6
10.00 9 2.0
10.00 10 2.1
3.50 2190 0.8
4.90 1045 0.6
10.00 39 1.2
10.00 35 1.1
3.40 1567 0.5
4.30 931 0.5
2.25 65 1.2
3.60 55 1.0
3.00 1816 0.8
4.10 993 0.5
1.50 70 1.2
2.20 60 1.1
N/A
__ ___
— — —
~ ~ ~
— — —
— _ __— —_
— — __
_ __- __
~ — —
w— _ — _
«_ _«_ —
— — —
.... N/A -
__
_ —— —
_ -__ —
_ — —
___ —
__ — —
— — — — ™~
— — —
__ — • ~
N/A
__ — —
_w ^m-— __
— ~~ ~ ~~
_ —
Z — —
_ —
— — — —
.. m^-r "**
_ — —
_ — . —
THREE MODE TEST EMISSION RESULTS ARE: HC - PPM/HEX, CO - %, UNCOHRECTED NOX - PPM
N-75
-------
APPENDIX N.CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST EMISSION RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
VEH
NO. YEAR MAKE
- H.P. — --
MODL CID 30HPH 50MPH HC CO
DENVER
RIGHT EXHAUST SYSTEM
NOX 02 HC CO NOX 02
LEFT EXHAUST SYSTEM
HC CO NOX 02 HC CO NOX
02
097 1972 DATS
510 97
BEFORE MICE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
098 1972 TOYO
( 9) (21)
50 M?H
099 1972 VOLK
100 1972 VOLK
CORO 120
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
KARM 97
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
KDMB 103
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
396 1972 CHEV
KING 350
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
50
30
IDLE (D
IDLE (N
50 MPH
0 MPH
(D)
IDLE (N)
0 MPH
MPH
( 9) (21)
50 MPH
MPH
(D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
— LEFT EXHAUST ~
( 9) (21)
50 MPH
COMPOSITE -
40 460 0.3
40 706 -0.4
(12) (26)
50 MPH
— LEFT EXHAUST
125 3.80 941 1.2
215 2.00 1990 0.9
3.70 1194
1 75 1020
IDLE
50
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST EMISSION RESULTS ARE: HC - PPM/HEX, CO - %, UNCORRECTED NOX - PPM
N-76
-------
APPENDIX N.CONT'D
LISTING CF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST EMISSION RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO. YEAR MAKE MODL CID
NOX 02 HC CO
LEFT EXHAUST SYSTEM
NOX 02 HC CO NOX
02
398 1972 CHRY NEWP 400
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MICE
REPLICATE
400 1972 DODG DART 318
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MICE
REPLICATE
401 1972 FORD PINT 122
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
404 1972 FORD LTD 429
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
410 1972 PLYM VALI 318
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
(15) (3D
50 MPH
MPH
MPH
IDLE (D)
N)
(12) (26)
0 MPH
0
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
75
~
- RlfflT EXHAUST -
170 3.20 1592 0.6
" 1.80 1617 0.7
- - - 0.6
0.7
0.5
0.7
0.8
0.7
3.50 1169
2.00 1119
0.20 74
0.25 40
1194
.20
.20
0.20
- RIGHT EXHAUST -
155 2.50 2090 0.9
]00 2.80 1070 " ~
10.00 26
700 10.00
160 2.70
3.60
10.00
N/A
MPH — ~
N/A ~
N/A
N/A
N/A —
— LEFT EXHAUST
?.80 470 0.6
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A —
N/A
N/A —
N/A
N/A
_ LEFT EXHAUST ,
280 4.40 767 0.6
2.80 880 0.7
9.80 38 0.9
9.80 36 0.9
5.40 849 0.7
3.05 880 0.6
9.40 34 0.9
9.60 30 0.9
N/A
FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST EMISSION RESULTS ARE: HC - PPM/HEX, CO - >, UNCORRECTED NOX - PPM
H-77
-------
APPENDIX N.CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST EMISSION RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
VEH H.P. ~
NO. YEAR MAKE MODL CID 30MPH 50MPH
HC
DENVER
RIGHT EXHAUST SYSTEM
CO NOX 02 HC CO NOX
LEFT EXHAUST SYSTEM
HC CO NOX 02 HC CO
NOX 02
865 1972 AMC GREM 232
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
871 1972 CHEV VEGA 140
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
877 1972 CHEV NOVA 307
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
883 1972 CHEV MALI 307
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
885 1972 CHEV CHEL 350
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
<59) (21)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50
30
IDLE
IDLE
( 9) (21)
50 MPH
(12) (26)
50 MPH
IDLE
MPH
IDLE (N
MPH
IDLE
MPH
IDLE
N/A —
N/A —
— LEFT EXHAUST
- 230 5.00
230
150
170
220
500
iToo
1.
,00 10
3.10 6
919
62
0.5
0.6
~2
0.5
0.6
215
395
1.30 101
3.70
5.80
J.60 1
3.20
706
61
0.5
0.6
oTs
0.5
0.6
_ _ _ — _ 295 4-80 63 0.6
N/A -
N/A —
— LEFT EXHAUST —
„: 2.20 1193 0.9
285 5.10 130 0.6
200 3.20
280 2.30
300 1.50
230 1.40
220 1.20
'10 2.
70
RIGHT EXHAUST -
" 1.20 1712 1.2
0.50 1617 1.5
10.00 29 0.9
32 0.8
1518 1.0
1667 1.3
10.00 38
10.00 32
N/A
N/A —
. 10
. 1518
0.60 1667
N/A
— 180 1.20 60 1.2 —
N/A
M/A
N/A —
N/A
1.00 1118
0.30 1015
2.90 111
lioo 1443
5.60 88
5.00 72
0.8 — — — — — —
ti
1.1
1.1
1.5
1.4
1.1
1.1
FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST EMISSION RESULTS ARE: HC - PPM/HEX, CO - >, UNCORRECTED NOX - PPM
N-78
-------
APPENDIX N.CONT'D
LISTING OP FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST EMISSION RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
VEH
NO. YEAR MAKE MODL CID
H.P. —
30MPH 50MPH
HC
DENVER
RIGHT EXHAUST SYSTEM
CO NOX 02 HC CO NOX
02 HC
LEFT HCHAOST
00 NOX 02 HC
CO NOX 02
886 1972 CHEV MONT 350
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MICE
REPLICATE
887 1972 CHEV NOVA 350
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
889
CHEV
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
890
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MICE
REPLICATE
891 1972 CHEV MONT 400
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MICE
REPLICATE
(15) (3D
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDU^
IDLE .
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
(15) (3D
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
MPH
MPH
(D)
IDLE CN)
50 MPH
50 MPH
30 KPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50
30
MPH
MPH
IDLE D
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
IDLE (N)
(15) (3D
50 MPH
12
- RIGHT EXHAUST -
140 3.00 665 0.7
220 2.60 207 0.
440 10.00 "~
425 10.00
50 4.40
100 4.70
130 10.00
140 10.00
170
275
310
160
180
280
2.30
2.00
1:8
330 1.50
150 1.60
- RIGHT
180 0.90
430
170
9.00
1.00 13
2.60 E
IP
.40
.60
2^0
4.90
- RIGHT
100
145
170
110
110
1ll§
120
6.50 48
0.60 1343
1.30 532
0.50 126
0.80 46
0.80 1219
2.20 491
0.90 121
1.50 56
— N/A —
N/A
1.9
1.8
2.1
!;i
— N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A —
1.0 —
N/A
COMPOSITE-.
N/A —
N/A —
1300 4.90 44 3.9
125 1.50 1891 1.2
580 0.70 1045 2.5
1380 5770 ~~46 57o
N/A
N/A
490 8.00 22 3.7
— 18 4.0
— 1020 7.50
1.00 11
1.20 6:
0.50
1.10
1.10
0.80
1.00
1.70
'1 - -
FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST EMISSION RESULTS ARE: HC - PPM/HEX, CO - %, UNCORRECTED NOX - PPM
N-79
-------
APPENDIX N.CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST EMISSION RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
VEH
NO. YEAR MAKE MODL CID
H P —
SOMPH'SOMPH
DENVER
RIGHT EXHAUST SYSTEM
HC CO NOX 02 HC CO NOX 02 HC CO
LEFT EXHAUST SYSTEM
NOX 02 HC CO NOX
02
894 1972 CHRY NEW 400
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
895 1972 DODG DART 225
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
897 1972 DODS DART 318
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
898 1972 DODG TOLA 360
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
899 1972 FORD PINT 122
BEFORE MICE
REPLICATE
AFTER MICE
REPLICATE
MPH
(15)
50
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50
30
MPH
MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
30
ID
:DLE (D)
IDLE (N)
LHPH
MPH
(D)
IDLE (N)
(12) (26)
50 MPH
(D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE
!°o
(D)
(N)
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
MPH
MPH
IDLE |Dj
(_?) (21)
- RIGHT
185
220
305
f05
N/A —
N/A
MPH —
nr n ~™ ~™
- RIGHT EXHAUST -
340 6.50
460 5.60
1480 10.00
1800 10.00
320 6.90
430 6.00
1260 10.00
1490 10.00
330
300 5.80 1443 0.
255 0.35 2090 1.
245 2.20 94 0.
190 1.90 70 0.3
300 5.80 1119 0.5
235 0.35 1941 1.2
250 2.95 70 0.3
200 2.05 68 - -
__ N/A —
N/A
LEFT EXHAUST —
180 2.40 880 0.7
195 0.95 1343 0.8
320 5.80
95
90
- l°0
70
50
1.50 716
0.50 860
0.62 74
0.46 50
i% m
wi IH
88
0.5
0.7
1.0
0.9
0.5
0.7
0.9
0.8
N/A
N/A
N/A —
N/A
N/A ~
N/A —
0.3 —
0.4 —
N/A
N/A
N/A
0.3 - -
FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST EMISSION RESULTS ARE: HC - PPM/HEX, CO - J, UNCORRECTED NOX - PPM
H-80
-------
APPENDIX N.CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST BffSSIOH RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
— H.P. ~
NO. YEAR
900 1972
901 1972
902 1972
QAO 1O*7O
3U3 Vjie.
9
904 1972
MAKE MODL CID
FORD PINT 98
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MICE
REPLICATE
FORD PINT 98
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
FORD HAVE 200
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
FORD MUST 351
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MICE
REPLICATE
FORD HAVE 302
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
30MPH 50MPH
( 9) (21)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (H)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
( 9) (21)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
1^1,1? \D)
IDLE W)
50 MPH
IDLE (N)
( 9) (21)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPR
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
IDLE (N)
(12) (26)
50 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
XDLB (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
SLE$>)
IDLE (N)
__ 4JJ.1JH44. ufUAni
HC CO NOX 02
• RXGfft &CHAUST —
360 7.60 399 2.1
300 0.60 1493 3.2
920 2.00 90 4.0
340 7.60 368 2.1
270 0.60 1294 3.1
1340 1.50 "103 iTe
390 8.40 430 0.4
280 0.70 2090 1.0
275 IT40 ~101 TTo
390 8.60 430 0.5
290 0.802090 1.2
230 iTio "Tie oTg
- RIGHT EXHAUST -
280 6.80 624 0.4
300 0.85 2886 1.2
~. ...» .» „
450 9.00 48 0.5
260 6.60 706 0.4
300 0.70 3185 1.1
430 iTgo ~~ii oTs
250 6.20 767 0.4
250 0.402364 1.5
» «M> •_• —
450 5.00 44 0.3
310 6.20 819 0.3
315 0.45 3384 1.1
510 sTeo ~~62 oTs
- RIGHT EXHAUST -
260 5.80 191 0.5
320 9.50 51 0.5
Too TTso ~o TTo
260 5.90 95 0.8
320 9.60 40 0.5
— — »« — • —
120 1.30 45 1.5
220 2.90 101 0.4
250 3.90 46 0.3
• _ *M ••JH. — —
80 1.30 30 1.0
220 2.80 131 0.5
260 4.00 48 0.4
90 1.50 30 1.0
N/A
._ _ — _
__ _ — —
— _ ^^. 1 t^mf
~ ~ —
:: z ~ z
— _* — — —
_ _ — —
-IH — _
- RIGHT EXHAUST -
340 2.00 1070 1.3
480 2.60 655 1.3
2000 2.50 166 3.5
2000 0.70 78 4.9
360 3.10 2787 1.6
580 3.80 1194 1.6
2000 1.80 348 4.6
2000 0.90 156 4.9
260 1.40 1343 2.1
300 1.40 757 1.7
450 2.20 72 1.5
300 3.20 42 1.5
280 1.80 1393 1.8
290 2.00 fee 1.3
410 3.00 65 1.1
290 4.50 32 1.0
WWA W
HC
—
~
—
.
—
^^
m_
_ _
—
—
__
— .
H
»
—
—
m^
—
ji,.^
«.
—
— .
—
«
Z
_
—
—
*_
— T
170
'm
940
175
190
580
920
120
370
130
115
118
—
«
—
—
~~"
—
—
__
—
J.UACA1 — — — — — •
CO NOX
N/A —
_
~ in
— —
^^ •••
_ —
_ *
_ IIN ___
_«
«» -
_
__ —
N/A
»
—
_
_
__ ___
« —
— »••_
— jm-._
— ~ ~—
__
N/A —
_ _m_._
— —
— jj-.—
— —
_ — —
— —
_ —
_
— —
PfYUPfYOTI
. (AjnryolJ
2.20 1692
0.80 1095
2i30 1742
0.90 1070
0.85 52
1.20 43
2.00 1294
0.70 716
0.20 45
.§0 1^68
0.60 849
0.20 45
0.45 49
it/*
__
— ~
— — —
*» »
*"^ ~™L'*
_ —
^^ — — m
~ ~
— —
02
—
—
_
—
«
^^
_|l—
«
__
—
—
«-
^^
—
—
^^^
w.
~«-
— «.
~"
_
—
— •
—
-
—
—
_4
—
—
' oTs
0.7
1.5
1.9
0.5
0.7
1.0
1.2
u
3.4
2.4
1 .2
f"^
.7
—
—
—
*" ~
—
_ _
—
•• ~
HC
—
—
mm
—
_^
^ ^
.^
.^
__
__
__
—
—
—
^—
_
__
__
~ ~
—
__
—
__
—
«
—
—
„
—
—
__
—
—
-
~~
—
*™~
—
—
—
""•
^^
—
__
—
^~~
— •— • jb&r i
CO NOX
___- H/* _
_ —
H IH
__ —
__ —
w — ^h-_—
». •••
__ "^^
« • —
— --m-
— —
-..« H/A ._
— —
m_ ^^^
_ —
_ —
_ —
^^ rr^Tf
»— _-,.n
«_ _-• .j
». _>• JIT
-~ *— '
^
N/A —
— —
— _. i
~ ~
__ _._ _
__ —
_ —
_ ——
— — -
. H/A -m-
_
_ —
_
_
» JUIHB
— — ~
~~ *"
_
_
__ -
__ —
_
n —
~ —
_
. DAUM
02
—
~~
—
—
~
~~
_
_
^^
—
—
—
_
__
,
^ ^
—
—
__
—
^_
—
__
—
—
•m~m
~
_
_
—
—
—
,,,111,
™*»
— *
_^«
—
—
—
~~
—
—
—
UO1 OJ
HC
—
"^
—
—
H
™
"
m tff
—
J._
____
—
—
—
_
__
_
^ _
_
—
—
^_
—
«»
—
_
„
-
—
__
—
—
—
_
—
~~
~~
—
—
—
~~
—
—
—
L31U1 — -
CO NOX 02
u /•
— —
~~ «•— — *«•
^ ^
IZ "* H
__ K^m __
— —
N/A
•— — .•• — —
— -..-- --
_ — _
~ — _
— — —
_
— _ ._
_ _ _ _ _. __
_ _^
~ __ —
— — _
N/A
— — —
_ _ «_
z in z
— __
__ — —
— — —
«M M —
*— —
H/A
_ — _
— — —
Z — _
__ — _ — .
_ — —
_** • - ~
_ __ —
— —— —
_ — —
_ — —
Z ZI —
V— _ _»
__ - - —
^^
— — ~
Z — —
— — —
FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST EMISSION RESULTS ARE: HC - PPM/HEX, CO - J, UNCORRECTED NOX - PPM
H-81
-------
APPENDIX N.CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST EMISSION RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
VEH
NO. YEAR MAKE MODL CID
H.P. —
30MPH 50MPH
HC CO
DENVER
RIGHT EXHAUST SYSTEM
NOX 02 HC CO NOX
02
HC CO
LEFT EXHAUST SYSTEM
NOX 02 HC CO NOX
02
906 1972 FORD HAVE 250
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MICE
REPLICATE
907 1972 FORD GALA 400
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
909 1972 FORD LTD 429
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
911 1972 FORD GALA 400
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
912 1972
- RIGHT
200
... KHAUST -
3^90 1144 o!;
10.00 771 "
25
1020 10.
180 2.
440 5.30
920 10.00
1060 10.00
50
BL
IDLE
MPH
MPH
DLE (D)
(N)
MPH
(15) ..
50 MPH
30 MP|
IDLE (D
IDLE (N
50 MPH,
30
IDL
IDLE (D
IDLE (N
50 MPH
IDLE
IDLE
(15) (3D
50 MPH
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
(12) (26)
50 MPH
IDLE (N)
MPH
MPH
(D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
220
2.60 2787
":§§ ^
•*aB
..-- 945
4.00 101
3.60 60
0.4
0.7
0.5
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.5
0.6
o.u
0.6
0.5
0.6
0.4
- RIGHT
160
220
220
140
150
190
200
100
- RIGHT EXHAUST -
120 2.00 1592 0.9
155 1.7Q 3PT 0.7
16
150
120 2.30 18
175 2.50 156
175 1.90
1.70
EXHAUST -
140
190
38
l_5o
1.10 2486
§:B15£
*3 4
0.70 1667
- RIGHT EXHAUST -
185 1.80 1144 1.4
310 3.60 778 0.9
300 7.00 88 0.2
250 6.20 70 0.2
220 2.40 1493 0.8
330 4.00 870 0.8
300 7.00 90 0.2
248 6.50 72 0.2
1.60
2.40
2.70
2.70
23
3.10
__ (j/A ______ _______ N/A _—__—_
-- N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A —
N/A
0.6 — —
o!4 ~ ~ ™
0*7 __ __. _„
03 — - «
N/A--
__ N/A —
0.6 — —
— N/A
N/A
N/A
0.4 — —
FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST EMISSION RESULTS ARE: HC - PPM/HEX, CO - J, UNCORRECTED NOX - PPM
N-82
-------
APPENDIX N.CONT'D
LISTING OP FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST EMISSION RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
DENVER
VEH
NO.
919
02"5
929
930
931
YEAR HAKE MODL CID
1972 PLYM VALI 198
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER HTCE
REPLICATE
1O79 PfiHT IJiMft ^50
l^fC tVni uGftlA JJV
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
1972 DATS B110 72
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
1972 DATS 510 97
BEFORE HTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
1972 OPEL 1900 116
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MICE
REPLICATE
H.P. ~
30MPH 50MPH
(12) (26)
50 MPH
ypififr (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
IDLE (D/
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
(12) (26)
\ te.i \eo/
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
( 9) (21)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
LMPH
MPH
IDLE IN)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
( 9) (21)
50 MPH
30 MPH
TftJ-E (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
IDLE (N)
( 9) (21)
50 MPH
30 ^JP$
iiSiBi CD/
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
iic "
--— .
— .
»..
— .
«
«**
_
— *
— .
—
—
255
420
520
i
520
450
190
275
1
k
__
—
__
~~
__
— —
—
—
~
~
—
~
—
--
—
—
«
~~
«
__
—
_
•»
^^
w«
—
—
RIGHT
CO NOX
— N/A
^^ -»_ii_i_
« -m~—
— — -.•-
« Tm.iM.^
— • ••
_
—
— .»—
— * __
_ __
— —
—
/nrr tnfUAfrc'
vmi uiuiAuo.
2.30 1692
2.30 1294
7.80 48
jjilO 995
8.80 41
1.95 1443
1 .90 819
0.42 18Q
0.70 56
2.00 1343
1.25 1194
0.40 217
0.86 60
— H/A
— . *__
—
__ __
_— ___
_ —
N/A
Z ZI
— —
— _
_ —
— —
»— «~
N/A
— — *
— •— •
— _—
» _ IM--HT
— ••«•
— — «
— —
— — -
•« -n« UN
"•" -""
w — ••
_ — .
— —
EXHAUST SXST31
02 HC CO KOX 02
™
__
«,_
—
*_
~
~
__
_
—
—
—
°~z
0.6
0.8
0.6
0.7
0.6
O.B
0.6
0.6
0.6
1.6
oil
1'.3
w
— •
—
_~
~~
__
—
—
—
^^
—
—
—
—
_
—
~ —
—
z
— »
—
—"
~*
— .
«—
—
— .
ml_m
•H.
«~W
^j.
«*•
—
_
—
-*
—
—
—
*.
—
—
—
—
^^
—
— —
...
~
_
»—
_
_
—
—
^^
•w
«
—
—
—
—
~~
—
—
—
—
~~
^^
z
— ~
—
«MB
N/A
*_ ••- ..
w ••— ••
— — —
— .*_ _—
« — —
« — «
_ —- . «
w. — _
—. — —
— — • —
-. — —
H — _.
— . WWT *.
— ...-I- —
— — ^
— — —
« •-•••- —
_ — _
_ — _
N/A
— «— ~ —
•— — — —
_ — _
__ ..w «
*_ ^~™" .*"
« _ _
~ ~ — ~
__ _
N/A
m_ I,, _
— — —
_ — _
— — —
Z — —
M -1-™"-' ™"r
N/A
M ~~"" -1"™
~"™ w™™ -"^
V. — —
H — —
— — — —
"• — «•" ""~
"""" ~^* H
~™ — ™"
_ — . —
«*• "*""' ~"~
M -LJJ™~ ^"~
~™* """"
LEFT EXHAUST SYSTEM
HC 00 NOX 02 HC CO NOX
— LEFT EXHAUST —
165 2.40 1791 1.4
340 2.60 1542 1.2
— _w ™ «.
375 8.60 40 1.7
180 2.50 1891 1.3
390 2.40 1692 1.2
•m.^ H __ __
410 8.80 46 1.6
160 2.202065 1.8
280 1.302214 1.7
135 1 20 92 15
150 2^20 21W 1>
280 1.50 2040 1.6
Tio TTao ^i? TTs
-j - «• ' H/A -••"
_ — ••• _*.
— — ...-• — .
— — __« ^»
— — — —
— — — —
_ ««. •_ • — ™
— — — ~
^^ _ .. _^
~ LEFT EXHAUST —
180 1.80 1070 0.4
200 1.20 665 0.6
420 5T80 ~~36 oTs
190 1.90 1095 0.5
200 1.40 665 0.5
430 iT20 ~40 0.3
140 1.80 276 0.4
130 1.30 171 0.5
200 1.50 28 0.3
140 1.60 276 0.4
140 1.20 156 0.5
200 TToO ~30 0^4
— LEFT EXHAUST —
120 0.25 3185 1.6
180 0.50 1542 1.1
610 7-00 36 0.8
130 0.19 2986 1.7
185 0.42 1567 1.1
600 7.40 35 0.8
140 0.50 2389 0.8
215 0.80 2214 0.8
365 FTSO 61 0.6
120 0.30 3185 0.9
230 0.90 2389 0.7
TTo iTso ~7 0.6
^^ H/A ujjin---
~" ~™ II- —
""*
"** ~™* m
Z _ — —
^™* ™™ I"™™
"~ H 1__- — I
^ f^ r mj
J_ ^ m_lm
— — — —
™~ ^ ^^
^ Jm j u,^
..
__
Z
».
—
—
J,_
J._
—
—
—
.M
—
—
—
—
«
—
—
_ ^
—
—
—
__
—
—
—
—
—
_
—
li
330
OCA
125
150
300
250
50
70
195
120
140
110
- - H/A —
» — ••
~ —
— —
*.. _—
_ —
— —
— ~ — •
^— — —m
•M _^j.
—
—
«/*
— —
__ -••,
— —-
_*_ «••«
— ~
W ^JBU.
_
— • *«.
N/A —
.• — «
«w ~-«.
_ _-
_« ..—
_ —
— — .
~- — »
_ —
N/A —
_ —
_ —
__ —
_ —
_ —
Z —
.P. COMPOSE
0.452787
0.30 1891
6.80 K
5.00 74
0.40 2986
0.20 1841
6.00 90
4.80 86
0.25 1095
0.22 491
0.30 116
0.40 68
0.25 1294
0.30 12W
0.42 151
0.50 80
02
—
—
~
•_
—
—
_—
—
»
—
—
—
„„
„,
™
*-
—
•H-
—
—
w-
~~
—
—
—
~~
—
__
—
—
~
—
—
—
'a
1.1
1.0
ili
1.0
4.3
4.5
1.3
3.0
1:1
1.0
2.4
FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST EMISSION RESULTS ARE: HC - PPM/HEX, CO - %, UNCORRECTED NOX - PPM
N-83
-------
APPENDIX N.CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL THREE MODE TEST EMISSION RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES BEFORE AND AFTER MAINTENANCE
VEH
NO. YEAR MAKE MODL CID
H P —
SOMPH'SOMPH
HC CO
DENVER
RIGHT EXHAUST
NOX 02 HC
CO NOX 02 HC CO
LEFT EXHAUST
NOX 02 HC
CO NOX 02
932 1972 TOYO CORO 71
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
1972 TOYO STAW 97
BEFORE MTCE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
935 1972 VOLK CONV
BEFORE
REPLICATE
AFTER MTCE
REPLICATE
( 9) (21)
50 MPH
30
IDLE
IDLE
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
LMPH
MPH
(D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
(D)
IDLE (N)
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE (D)
IDLE (N)
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A —
- T.P. COMPOSITE -
240
170
320
240
200
3.
1.
.80
20
MO
J.80 1L..
1.20 94
0.3
0.2
0.1
— LEFT EXHAUST —
280 6.90 757 0.4
250
395
6.40 798
265 0.42 1493
430 ibToo "35
230
250
210
260
2.60 1493
0.30 1567
iTeo ""49
2.40 1642
0.30 1592
— LEFT EXHAUST ~
250 4.30 1244 0.5
290 1.80 1294 0.6
580 7.90 46 0.4
550 8.00 38 0.3
320 6.40 716 0.4
280 1.80 1343 0.6
480 7.90 48 0.3
580 8.00 40 0.3
0.2 — —
O.fl — —
100
210
0.8
1.6
1990
941
390 10.00 38
100 1.30 2115
170 1.60 1045
340 ibToo ~~48
1.0 — — — —
0.4 __ ___ ._
n c
°:6 _ _ _ _
0.4 — • — — —
OE __ ___ __
• J ~~ ~~ •••
N/A
1393 1.2 — —
0.6 - - — -
Q_H __ __ ___
oTe " ~ " —
1. f - __ __
— 480 3.80 56 1.1 — —
N/A —
N/A
— 380 9.20 55 0.3 — — — — — —
FEDERAL THESE MODE TEST EMISSION RESULTS ARE HC'- PPM/HEX, CO - %, UNCORRECTED NOX - PPM
N-M
-------
APPENDIX 0
-------
APPENDIX 0
LISTING OF FUEL LEAD CONTENT TEST RESULTS
AND NUMBER OF CATALYTIC CONVERTERS ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES
Legend
VEH NO. - Vehicle Number
YEAR - Model Year
MAKE - Vehicle Make
MODEL - Vehicle Model
CID - Engine Displacement in Cubic Inches
CATALYST - Number of Catatytic Converters on Vehicle
LEAD CONTENT - Lead Content of Fuel in Vehicle when accepted from
owner, in Grains per Gallon (values over 0.1 are
off scale readings, 0.1 grams/gallon is upper limit
of instrumentation)
0-1
-------
APPENDIX 0
LISTING OF FUEL LEAD CONTENT TEST RESULTS
AND NUMBER OF CATALYTIC CONVERTERS ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES
DENVER
VEH
NO.
001
002
003
004
005
006
007
008
009
010
011
012
013
on
.015
016
017
018
019
020
021
022
023
024
025
026
027
028
029
030
031
032
033
034
035
YEAR
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
MAKE
CHEV
CHEV
CHEV
CHEV
DODG •
FORD
FORD
FORD
FORD
CMC
AMMO
BUIC
BUIC
BUIC
CADI
CHEV
CHEV
CHEV
CHEV
CHEV
CHEV
CHRY
DODG
DODG
FORD
FORD
FORD
FORD
FORD
MERC
MERC
OLDS
OLDS
OLDS
PLYM
MODEL
TRUC
TRUC
TRUC
TRUC
TRUC
TRUC
TRUC
TRUC
TRUC
TRUC
HORN
CNTY
RIVI
REGA
ELDO
VEGA
NOVA
MONT
CAPR
IMPA
STAW
NEWP
CORO
DART
MUST
TORI
GRAN
LTD
LTD
MARQ
MONO
DELT
CUTL
DELT
FURY
CID
350
350
350
350
318
302
302
351
351
350
258
350
455
350
500
140
250
350
350
350
400
400
318
225
140
351
250
351
400
400
351
350
350
455
318
C
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
NO
NO
1
NO
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
CATALYST
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CDNVERTER
CONVERTER
.LEAD CONTENT
0.019
0.016
0.021
0.005
0.017
0.072
0.022
0.023
0.039
0.020
0.072
0.013
0.010
0.018
0.029
0.004
0.021
0.070
0.038
0.018
0.015
0.008
0.019
0.017
0.012
0.016
0.022
0.018
0.019
0.016
0.010
0.013
0.015
0.017
0.013
0-2
-------
APPENDIX 0,CONT'D
LISTING OF FUEL LEAD CONTENT TEST RESULTS
AND NUMBER OF CATALYTIC CONVERTERS ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES
DENVER
VEH
NO.
036
037
038
039
040
041
042
043
044
045
231
2-32
233
234
235
236
238
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
YEAR
1975
1975
1975
1975
1976
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1976
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
MAKE
PLYM
PONT
PONT
PONT
CAPR
DATS
BOND
TOYO
VOLK
VOLK
AMMO
AMMO
AMMO
BUIC
BUIC
BUIC
BUIC
BUIC
CADI
CADI
CADI
CHEV
CHEV
CHEV
CHEV
CHEV
CHEV
CHEV
CHEV
CHEV
CHEV
CHEV
CHEV
CHEV
CHEV
MODEL
DUST
CATA
LEMA
GRNV
SEDA
B210
SEDA
CORO
SEDA
STAW
GREM
HORN
MATA
SKYH
SKYL
REGA
STAW
RIVI
SEVI
DEVI
FLEE
VEGA
MONZ
MONZ
NOVA
NOVA
CAMA
NOVA
MALI
MALI
MALI
STAW
• MONT
MONT
CAPR
CID
225
400
350
455
140
85
91
133
97
90
232
304
360
231
260
350
350
455
350
500
500
140
140
262
250
262
350
350
350
350
350
350
400
400
350
(
1
1
1
1
1
NO
NO
NO
NO
1
NO
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
NO
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
;ATALYST
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
LEAD CONTENT
0.023
0.015
0.015
0.010
0.023
1 .000
1 .100
0.970
0.990
0.016
0.012
0.013
0.013
0.010
0.010
0.021
0.031
0.970
0.021
0.026
0.013
0.030
0.013
0.046
0.058
0.014
0.005
0.020
0.007
0.009
0.019
0.021
0.016
0.018
0.052
0-3
-------
APPENDIX 0,CONT'D
LISTING OF FUEL LEAD CONTENT TEST RESULTS
AND NUMBER OF CATALYTIC CONVERTERS ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES
DENVER
VEH
NO.
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
270
272
273
275
276
277
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
297
298
300
301
YEAR
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
MAKE
CHEV
CHEV
CHEV
CHEV
CHEV •
CHEV
CHEV
CHEV
CHRY
CHRY
DODG
DODG
DODG
FORD
FORD
FORD
FORD
FORD
FORD
FORD
FORD
FORD
FORD
FORD
FORD
FORD
FORD
FORD
FORD
LINC
MERC
MERC
MERC
OLDS
OLDS
MODEL
IMPA
IMPA
IMPA
IMPA
CAPR
IMPA
CAPR
CAPR
CORD
IMPE
DART
CHAR
MONA
MUST
PINT
MUST
GRAN
STAW
TORI
TORI
LTD
ELIT
LTD
TORI
LTD
LTD
LTD
LTD
LTD
CONT
MONA
MONT
COUG
OMEG
CUTL
CID
350
350
350
350
400
400
454
454
360
440
318
360
400
140
140
171
302
351
351
400
351
351
351
351
400
400
400
400
460
460
302
351
351
260
350
C
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
NO
NO
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
:ATALYST
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
LEAD CONTENT
0.021
0.004
0.017
0.027
0.010
0.021
0.008
0.000
0.090
0.033
0.080
0.015
0.014
0.090
0.035
0.033
0.041
0.013
0.019
0.015
0.03^
0.018
0.020
0.013
0.010
0.010
0.020
0.015
0.015
0.019
0.014
0.016
0.020
0.040
0. 031*
0-4
-------
APPENDIX 0,CONT'D
LISTING OF FUEL LEAD CONTENT TEST RESULTS
AND NUMBER OF CATALYTIC CONVERTERS ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES
DENVER
VEH
NO.
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
335
336
338
339
340
YEAR
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1976
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
MAKE
OLDS
OLDS
OLDS
OLDS
OLDS
PLYM
PLYM
PLYM
PLYM
PLYM
PLYM
PLYM
PONT
PONT
PONT
PONT
PONT
PONT
PONT
AUDI
CAPR
COLT
DATS
DATS
DATS
FIAT
FIAT
BOND
MAZD
MAZD
MG
OPEL
PORS
TOYO
TOYO
MODEL
CUTL
STAW
CUTL
STAW
DELT
DUST
SCAM
VALI
FURY
FURY
FURY
FURY
ASTR
LEMA
VENT
LEMA
CATA
STAW
GRNV
FOX
GHIA
SEDA
710
B210
SEDA
STAW
X1-9
CVCC
RX3
RX3
MGB
STAW
• 911S
CORO
CELI
CID
350
350
455
455
455
225
318
318
318
360
400
360
140
350
350
350
400
400
455
97
171
98
119
85
119
78
79
91*
70
70
110
116
164
97
133
CATALYST
1 CONVERTER
1 CONVERTER
1 CONVERTER
1 CONVERTER
1 CONVERTER
1 CONVERTER
1 CONVERTER
1 CONVERTER
1 CONVERTER
1 CONVERTER
1 CONVERTER
1 CONVERTER
1 CONVERTER
1 CONVERTER
1 CONVERTER
1 CONVERTER
1 CONVERTER
1 CONVERTER
1 CONVERTER
NO CONVERTER
2 CONVERTER
NO CONVERTER
NO CONVERTER
NO CONVERTER
NO CONVERTER
NO CONVERTER
1 CONVERTER
NO CONVERTER
NO CONVERTER
NO CONVERTER
NO CONVERTER
NO CONVERTER
NO CONVERTER
NO CONVERTER
NO CONVERTER
LEAD CONTENT
0.011
0.011
0.031
0.012
0.080
0.010
0.030
0.018
0.980
0.026
0.020
0.017
0.046
0.018
0.014
0.015
0.015
0.090
0.009
1 .000
0.071
1.000
1.000
0.950
1.100
0.940
0.021
1 .000
0.019
«* f* A £
0.016
1.000
0.023
0.950
1.000
0.065
0-5
-------
APPENDIX 0,CONT'D
LISTING OF FUEL LEAD CONTENT TEST RESULTS
AND NUMBER OF CATALYTIC CONVERTERS ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES
DENVER
VEH
NO.
341
342
343
344
345
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
YEAR
1975
1975
1975-
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1976
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
MAKE
TOYO
VOLK
VOLK
VOLK
VOLV •
FORD
MERC
OLDS
PLYM
PONT
BMW
BMW
SUBA
MERE
PORS
SAAB
AMMO
AMMO
DODG
MERC
AMMO
AMMO
AMMO
AMMO
AMMO
AMMO
AMMO
AMMO
BUIC
BUIC
BUIC
BUIC
BUIC
BUIC
BUIC
MODEL
CORO
SEDA
RABB
RABB
SEDA
GRAN
MONA
OMEG
GRNF
VENT
SEDA
5301
STAW
450S
914
99LE
HORN
HORN
MONA
MARQ
GREM
HORN
PACE
HORN
HORN
HORN
PACE
MATA
SKYL
REGA
LESA
LESA
REGA
REGA
LESA
CID
97
97
90
90
121
200
250
250
400
250
121
182
83
276
120
121
232
258
440
460
232
232
258
258
232
258
258
304
260
350
350
350
350
350
350
C
NO
NO
1
1
1
NO
1
1
1
1
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
1
1
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
IATALYST
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER^
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
LEAD
1.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
1 .
1 .
1.
0.
1.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
CONTENT
000
970
017
020
950
014
020
005
009
033
000
300
100
057
000
950
010
031
018
026
100
005
019
020
017
011
035
004
020
020
220
021
043
021
006
0-6
-------
APPENDIX 0,CONT'D
LISTING OF FUEL LEAD CONTENT TEST RESULTS
AND NUMBER OF CATALYTIC CONVERTERS ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES
DENVER
VEH
NO.
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
YEAR
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1976
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
MAKE
BUIC
BUIC
BUIC
BUIC
BUIC
BUIC
CADI
CADI
CADI
CADI
CADI
CADI
CADI
CADI
CHEV
CHEV
CHEV
CHEV
CHEV
CHEV
CHEV
CHEV
CHEV
CHEV
CHEV
CHEV
CHEV
CHEV
CHEV
CHEV
CHEV
CHEV
CHEV
CHEV
CHEV
MODEL
LESA
LESA
LESA
RIVI
RIVI
STAW
ELDO
DEVI
ELDO
CALA
ELDO
DEVI
CALA
SEVI
MONZ
VEGA
VEGA
MONZ
VEGA
VEGA
VEGA
MONZ
VEGA
MONZ
NOVA
CAMA
NOVA
NOVA
NOVA
MONZ
MONZ
NOVA
• NOVA
NOVA
NOVA
CID
350
350
455
455
455
455
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
350
140
140
140
140
140
140
140
140
140
262
250
350
250
262
262
262
262
350
350
350
350
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
CATALYST
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
LEAD CONTENT
0.027
0.017
0.040
0.021
0.008
0.025
0.018
0.027
0.018
0.048
0.024
0.010
0.004
0.022
0.017
0.027
0.060
0.010
0.045
1 .000
0.014
0.020
0.021
0.010
0.020
0.027
0.019
0.900
0.010
0.005
0.021
0.028
0.039
0.018
0.023
0-7
-------
APPENDIX 0,CONT'D
LISTING OF FUEL LEAD CONTENT TEST RESULTS
AND NUMBER OF CATALYTIC CONVERTERS ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES
DENVER
VEH
NO.
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
YEAR
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1976
1976
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1976
1975
MAKE
CHEV
CHEV
CHEV
CHEV
CHEV
CHEV
CHEV
CHEV
CHEV
CHEV
CHEV
CHEV
CHEV
CHEV
CHEV
CHEV
CHEV
CHEV
CHEV
CHEV
CHEV
CHEV
CHEV
CHEV
CHEV
CHRY
CHRY
CHRY
CHRY
CHRY
CHRY
CHRY
DODG
DODG
DODG
MODEL
CAMA
NOVA
NOVA
MALI
• MONT
MALI
MALI
MONT
MONT
MALI
MONT
MALI
STAW
STAW
NOVA
MONT
MALI
STAW
CAMA
MALI
STAW
IMPA
STAW
IMPA
CAPR
CORD
CORD
NEWP
CORD
NEWP
NEWY
NEWY
DART
DART
DART
CID
350
350
250
350
350
350
350
350
350
350
350
350
350
454
350
350
350
350
350
305
400
400
400
400
454
360
360
400
360
400
440
440
225
225
318
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
CATALYST
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
LEAD
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
CONTENT
021
017
018
022
028
013
022
033
012
036
025
017
019
015
018
021
014
026
014
012
015
008
060
018
004
019
011
020
021
013
015
026
026
009
042
0-8
-------
APPENDIX 0,CONT'D
LISTING OF FUEL LEAD CONTENT TEST RESULTS
AND NUMBER OF CATALYTIC CONVERTERS ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES
DENVER
VEH
NO.
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
63^
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
YEAR
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1976
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
MAKE
DODG
DODG
DODG
DODG
DODG
FORD
FORD
FORD
FORD
FORD
FORD
FORD
FORD
FORD
FORD
FORD
FORD
FORD
FORD
FORD
FORD
FORD
FORD
FORD
FORD
FORD
FORD
FORD
FORD
FORD
FORD
FORD
FORD
FORD
FORD
MODEL
DART
CHAR
CHAR
CHAR
MONA
PINT
PINT
PINT
MUST
MUST
PINT
PINT
PINT
PINT
PINT
PINT
PINT
STAW
PINT
STAW
MUST
GRAN
MUST
MAVE
GRAN
MAVE
GRAN
GRAN
GRAN
ELIT
GRAN
GRAN
• GRAN
TORI
STAW
CID
318
318
360
400
400
140
140
140
140
140
140
140
140
140
140
140
171
171
171
171
171
200
302
250
250
250
302
351
302
351
302
302
302
351
351
(
1
1
1
1
1
NO
1
1
NO
NO
NO
NO
1
1
NO
NO
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
NO
1
NO
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
3ATALYST
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
LEAD CONTENT
0.014
0.008
0.012
1 .000
0.021
0.023
0.018
0.025
0.200
0.021
0.008
0.027
0.014
0.014
0.007
0.019
0.013
0.090
0.008
0.016
0.080
0.018
0.018
0.012
0.023
0.014
0.027
0.080
0. 008
0.005
0.008
0.050
0.019
0.014
0.000
0-9
-------
APPENDIX 0,CONT'D
LISTING OF FUEL LEAD CONTENT TEST RESULTS
AND NUMBER OF CATALYTIC CONVERTERS ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES
DENVER
VEH
NO.
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
YEAR
1975
1975
1975
1976
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1976
1975
1975
1976
1975
1975
1975
1975
1976
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1976
1975
1975
MAKE
FORD
FORD
FORD
FORD
FORD
FORD
FORD
FORD
FORD
FORD
FORD
LINC
LINC
MERC
MERC
MERC
MERC
MERC
MERC
MERC
OLDS
OLDS
OLDS
OLDS
OLDS
OLDS
OLDS
OLDS
OLDS
OLDS
OLDS
OLDS
OLDS
OLDS
OLDS
MODEL
ELIT
LTD
GRAN
RANG
• TORI
GRAN
TORI
LTD
LTD
THND
THND
CONT
MRK4
MONA
MONA
MONA
COUG
MONG
MONG
MONA
OMEG
OMEG
CUTL
CUTL
CUTL
CUTL
CUTL
CUTL
CUTL
DELT
DELT
CUTL
STAW
CUTL
DELT
CID
400
460
351
351
351
351
351
400
400
460
460
460
460
200
250
302
351
351
351
351
260
260
260
260
260
260
260
350
350
350
350
350
350
455
455
1
1
NO
1
1
NO
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
CATALYST
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
LEAD CONTENT
0.054
0.013
0.009
0.180
0.008
0.018
0.015
0.019
0.039
0.021
1 .000
0.014
0.031
0.004
0.024
0.019
0.013
0.020
0.011
0.017
0.019
0.026
0.018
0.019
0.024
0.015
0.058
0.013
0.016
0.018
0.029
0.025
0.011
0.024
0.015
0-10
-------
APPENDIX O.CONT'D
LISTING OF FUEL LEAD CONTENT TEST RESULTS
AND NUMBER OF CATALYTIC CONVERTERS ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES
DENVER
VEH
NO.
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
046
047
048
YEAR
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1976
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1976
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1975
1974
1974
1974
MAKE
PLYM
PLYM
PLYM
PLYM
PLYM
PLYM
PLYM
PONT
PONT
PONT
PONT
PONT
PONT
PONT
PONT
AUDI
DATS
DATS
MG
OPEL
OPEL
TOYO
TOYO
TOYO
TOYO
VOLK
VOLK
VOLK
VOLK
VOLK
VOLK
VOLV
AMMO
BUIC
BUIC
MODEL
DUST
VALI
DUST
DUST
FURY
FURY
STAW
FIRE
VENT
FIRE
LEMA
CATA
FIRE
STAW
GRNV
100L
B210
B210
MIDG
1900
STAW
STAW
CORO
CORO
CORO
SEDA
SEDA
SEDA
TRAN
RABB
RABB
242G
-HORN
RIVI
CENT
CID
225
225
225
318
318
360
400
250
260
350
350
400
400
400
400
114
85
85
91
116
116
97
97
133
134
97
97
97
109
90
90
121
304
455
350
•
CATALYST
1 CONVERTER
1 CONVERTER
1 CONVERTER
1 CONVERTER
1 CONVERTER
1 CONVERTER
1 CONVERTER
1 CONVERTER
1 CONVERTER
1 CONVERTER
1 CONVERTER
1 CONVERTER
1 CONVERTER
1 CONVERTER
1 CONVERTER
NO CONVERTER
NO CONVERTER
NO CONVERTER
NO CONVERTER
NO CONVERTER
NO CONVERTER
NO CONVERTER
NO CONVERTER
NO CONVERTER
NO CONVERTER
NO CONVERTER
NO CONVERTER
NO CONVERTER
NO CONVERTER
1 CONVERTER
1 CONVERTER
NO CONVERTER
NO CONVERTER
NO CONVERTER
NO CONVERTER
LEAD CONTENT
0.012
0.020
0.031
0.010
0.070
0.021
0.021
0.019
0.023
0.034
0.013
0.010
0.023
0.021
0.022
1 .000
1.000
1 .000
1 .200
0.040
0.028
1.100
1 .300
1.200
1.000
1.100
0.970
0.028
1 .000
_ t* *\ £
0.006
0.018
0.980
1.000
0.980
1.000
0-11
-------
APPENDIX 0,CONT'D
LISTING OF FUEL LEAD CONTENT TEST RESULTS
AND NUMBER OF CATALYTIC CONVERTERS ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES
DENVER
VEH
NO.
049
050
051
052
053
054
055
056
057
058
059
060
061
062
063
064
065
066
067
068
069
070
071
072
073
074
075
346
347
348
350
351
352
354
355
YEAR
1974
1974
1974
1974
1974
1974
1974
1974
1974
1974
1974
1974
1974
1974
1974
1974
1974
1974
1974
1974
1974
1974
1974
1974
1974
1974
1974
1974
1974
1974
1974
1974
1974
1974
1974
MAKE
CHEV
CHEV
CHEV
CHEV
CHEV
CHEV
DODG
DODG
FORD
FORD
FORD
FORD
FORD
LING
MERC
OLDS
OLDS
OLDS
PLYM
PLYM
PONT
PONT
DATS
MAZD
TOYO
VOLK
VOLK
BUIC
CADI
CHEV
CHEV
CHEV
CHRY
FORD
FORD
MODEL
VEGA
MONT
NOVA
CAMA
CHEL
CAPR
CHAR
DART
PINT
MAVE
MAVE
LTD
LTD
CONT
MONT
CUTL
DELT
98
SATE
DUST
BONN
LEMA
610
RX3
CELI
SEDA
SEDA
REGA
DEVI
MALI
IMPA
IMPA
NEWP
ELIT
LTD
CID
140
350
250
350
350
400
318
225
122
302
250
400
400
460
302
350
350
455
318
225
400
350
119
70
97
97
97
455
472
350
350
400
400
351
400
CATALYST
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
LEAD CONTENT
0
1
1
0
0
1
0
0
1
1
0
1
0
1
0
1
1
0
0
1
1
1
1
0
1
0
0
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
.930
.000
.000
.930
.033
.000
.019
.940
.000
.500
.090
.000
.960
.000
.970
.000
.000
.950
.920
.100
.000
.000
.000
.007
.000
.940
.150
.019
.100
.100
.200
.000
.000
.000
.100
0-12
-------
APPENDIX 0,CONT'D
LISTING OF FUEL LEAD CONTENT TEST RESULTS
AND NUMBER OF CATALYTIC CONVERTERS ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES
DENVER
VEH
NO.
357
358
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
YEAR
1974
1974
1974
1974
1974
1974
1974
1974
1974
1974
1974
1974
1974
1974
1974
1974
1974
1974
1974
1974
1974
1974
1974
1974
1974
1974
1974
1974
1974
1974
1974
1974
1974
1974
1974
MAKE
MERC
OLDS
AMMO
AMMO
AMMO
BUIC
BUIC
BUIC
CADI
CHEV
CHEV
CHEV
CHEV
CHEV
CHEV
CHEV
CHEV
CHEV
CHEV
DODG
DODG
DODG
FORD
FORD
FORD
FORD
FORD
FORD
FORD
FORD
FORD
FORD
FORD '
FORD
FORD
MODEL
COUG
CUTL
GREM
GREM
MATA
APOL
LASA
ELEC
DEVI
VEGA
VEGA
NOVA
NOVA
NOVA
MONT
MALI
NOVA
NOVA
IMPA
CHAL
CHAR
DART
PINT
PINT
PINT
PINT
MUST
MAVE
MUST
MAVE
TORI
TORI
TORI
LTD
STAW
CID
400
350
232
258
304
350
350
455
472
140
140
350
350
350
350
350
350
350
400
318
318
225
122
122
140
140
171
250
171
302
400
351
351
351
400
C
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
CATALYST
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
LEAD
1 .
0.
1 .
1 .
1 .
1 .
1 .
1 .
1 .
1 .
0.
0.
0.
1 .
1.
0.
1 .
1 .
1.
0.
1 .
0.
1 .
1 .
1 .
0.
1 .
0.
0.
1 .
1 .
1 .
0.
1 .
0.
CONTENT
300
960
200
000
200
300
200
100
200
200
027
990
980
100
000
970
100
000
000
100
500
950
000
000
000
990
000
990
960
000
400
000
990
200
980
0-13
-------
APPENDIX 0,CONT'D
LISTING OF FUEL LEAD CONTENT TEST RESULTS
AND NUMBER OF CATALYTIC CONVERTERS ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES
DENVER
VEH
NO.
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
767
768
769
770
771
772
773
774
775
776
777
778
779
780
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
YEAR
1974
1974
1974
1974
1974
1974
1974
1974
1974
1974
1974
1974
1974
1974
1974
1974
1974
1974
1974
1974
1974
1974
1974
1974
1974
1974
1974
1973
1973
1973
1973
1973
1973
1973
1973
MAKE
MERC
MERC
OLDS
OLDS
OLDS
PLYM
PLYM
PLYM
PLYM
PLYM
PONT
PONT
PONT
PONT
AUDI
CAPR
COLT
DATS
DATS
FIAT
FIAT
MERE
TOYO
TOYO
VOLK
VOLK
VOLV
AMMO
BUIC
CADI
CHEV
CHEV
CHEV
CHEV
CHEV
MODEL
COME
COUG
CUTL
CUTL
CUTL
DUST
DUST
DUST
FRY3
FURY
FIRE
LEMA
CATA
LEMA
100L
SPOR
SEDA
SEDA
710
128
128
280
CORO
CORO
SEDA
412
142
HORN
ELEC
DEVI
VEGA
MALI
NOVA
IMPA
IMPA
CID
200
351
350
350
350
198
225
318
360
400
350
350
400
400
114
171
98
78
119
79
79
168
120
97
97
109
121
232
455
472
140
350
350
350
350
CATALYST
NO CONVERTER
NO CONVERTER
NO CONVERTER
NO CONVERTER
NO CONVERTER
NO CONVERTER
NO CONVERTER
NO CONVERTER
NO CONVERTER
NO CONVERTER
NO CONVERTER
NO CONVERTER
NO CONVERTER
NO CONVERTER
NO CONVERTER
NO CONVERTER
NO CONVERTER
NO CONVERTER
NO CONVERTER
NO CONVERTER
NO CONVERTER
NO CONVERTER
NO CONVERTER
NO CONVERTER
NO CONVERTER
NO CONVERTER
NO CONVERTER
NO CONVERTER
NO CONVERTER
NO CONVERTER
NO CONVERTER
NO CONVERTER
NO CONVERTER
NO CONVERTER
NO CONVERTER
LEAD CONTENT
0.990
0.990
1 .000
1 .100
1 .000
1 .000
1 .000
1 .100
0.980
1 .000
0.022
1 .200
0.990
1 .000
1 .100
1 .000
1 .000
1 .000
1 .000
0.990
0.990
0.960
1 .000
1 .000
1 .400
1 .000
1.000
0.017
0.015
0.960
0.920
0.970
0.950
0.950
0.980
0-14
-------
APPENDIX 0,CONT'D
LISTING OF FUEL LEAD CONTENT TEST RESULTS
AND NUMBER OF CATALYTIC CONVERTERS ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES
DENVER
VEH
NO.
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
366
368
371
375
377
379
380
382
383
387
781
782
783
784
785
786
YEAR
1973
1973
1973
1973
1973
1973
1973
1973
1973
1973
1973
1973
1973
1973
1973
1973
1973
1973
1973
1973
1973
1973
1973
1973
1973
1973
1973
1973
1973
1973
1973
1973
1973
1973
1973
MAKE
CHEV
DODG
FORD
FORD
FORD
FORD
FORD
MERC
OLDS
OLDS
PLYM
PLYM
PONT
PONT
DATS
OPEL
TOYO
VOLK
VOLK
BUIC
BUIC
CHEV
DODG
FORD
FORD
FORD
OLDS
OLDS
CAPR
AMMO
AMMO
AMMO
BUIC
BUIC
BUIC
MODEL
IMPA
DART
PINT
TORI
MAVE
CUST
LTD
MONR
98
CUTL
SATE
DUST
CATA
LEMA
TRUC
MANT
CORO
KOMB
SEDA
CENT
ELEC
MALI
CHAR
PINT
LTD
THND
CUTL
98
2000
HORN
HORN
MATA
'CENT
CENT
LESA
CID
400
225
122
351
302
351
400
400
455
350
318
225
400
350
97
116
97
103
97
350
455
350
318
122
400
460
350
455
122
232
304
258
350
350
350
CATALYST
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
LEAD CONTENT
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
1
0
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
.100
.900
.950
.000
.950
.990
.098
.100
.000
.020
.000
.500
.000
.970
.990
.970
.095
.940
.960
.300
.000
.000
.990
.100
.000
.010
.100
.100
.200
.000
.100
.000
.000
.000
.000
0-15
-------
APPENDIX 0,CONT'D
LISTING OF FUEL LEAD CONTENT TEST RESULTS
AND NUMBER OF CATALYTIC CONVERTERS ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES
DENVER
VEH
NO.
787
788
789
790
791
792
793
794
795
796
797
798
799
800
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
813
814
815
816
817
818
819
820
821
YEAR
1973
1973
1973
1973
1973
1973
1973
1973
1973
1973
1973
1973
1973
1973
1973
1973
1973
1973
1973
1973
1973
1973
1973
1973
1973
1973
1973
1973
1973
1973
1973
1973
1973
1973
1973
MAKE
BUIC
CADI
CADI
CHEV
CHEV
CHEV
CHEV
CHEV
CHEV
CHEV
CHEV
CHEV
CHEV
CHEV
CHEV
CHEV
CHEV
CHEV
CHEV
CHEV
CHEV
CHEV
CHRY
CHRY
DODG
DODG
DODG
DODG
FORD
FORD
FORD
FORD
FORD
FORD
FORD
MODEL
LESA
DEVI
DEVI
VEGA
VEGA
VEGA
NOVA
NOVA
NOVA
NOVA
CAPR
CHEL
NOVA
MALI
LAGU
IMPA
IMPA
IMPA
MONT
IMPA
IMPA
STAW
NEWP
NEWY
DART
DART
CHAR
DART
PINT
PINT
STAW
PINT
MAVE
MAVE
MAVE
CID
455
472
472
140
140
140
250
307
307
350
400
350
307
350
350
350
350
350
350
400
350
454
400
440
225
318
400
318
122
122
122
122
200
250
302
CATALYST
NO CONVERTER
NO CONVERTER
NO CONVERTER
NO CONVERTER
NO CONVERTER
NO CONVERTER
NO .CONVERTER
NO CONVERTER
NO CONVERTER
NO CONVERTER
NO CONVERTER
NO CONVERTER
NO CONVERTER
NO CONVERTER
NO CONVERTER
NO CONVERTER
NO CONVERTER
NO CONVERTER
NO CONVERTER
NO CONVERTER
NO CONVERTER
NO CONVERTER
NO CONVERTER
NO CONVERTER
NO CONVERTER
NO CONVERTER
NO CONVERTER
NO CONVERTER
NO CONVERTER
NO CONVERTER
NO CONVERTER
NO CONVERTER
NO CONVERTER
NO CONVERTER
NO CONVERTER
LEAD CONTENT
0.011
1.100
1 .300
1 .000
1 .200
1 .100
1 .200
1 .000
1 .200
1 .100
1 .200
0.029
0.950
1 .100
1 .100
N,
1 .100
1 .200
1 .000
0.950
1 .200
1 .200
0.900
1 .000
1 .000
1 .000
0.990
1 .100
1 .000
1 .100
1 .000
0.080
1 .100
1 .200
1 .100
1 .000
0-16
-------
APPENDIX 0,CONT'D
LISTING OF FUEL LEAD CONTENT TEST RESULTS
AND NUMBER OF CATALYTIC CONVERTERS ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES
DENVER
VEH
NO.
822
823
824
825
826
827
828
829
830
831
832
833
834
835
836
837
838
839
840
841
842
843
844
845
846
847
848
849
850
851
852
853
854
855
856
YEAR
1973
1973
1973
1973
1973
1973
1973
1973
1973
1973
1973
1973
1973
1973
1973
1973
1973
1973
1973
1973
1973
1973
1973
1973
1973
1973
1973
1973
1973
1973
1973
1973
1973
1973
1973
MAKE
FORD
FORD
FORD
FORD
FORD
FORD
FORD
FORD
LINC
MERC
MERC
MERC
OLDS
OLDS
OLDS
OLDS
PLYM
PLYM
PLYM
PLYM
PLYM
PLYM
PONT
PONT
PONT
PONT
PONT
PONT
DATS
DATS
BOND
MAZD
MAZD
MG
PORS
MODEL
MAVE
MUST
MAVE
MAVE
LTD
LTD
TORI
GALA
CONT
COME
MONO
MONT
CUTL
CUTL
CUTL
CUTL
DUST
DUST
DUST
SATA
SATE
FRY3
VENT
LEMA
LEMA
CATA
CATA
STAW
B610
240Z
CIVI
RX2
-RX2
CONV
914
CID
250
302
302
250
429
400
351
400
460
250
351
400
350
350
350
350
225
225
318
318
318
360
350
350
350
400
400
400
108
146
71
70
70
110
102
C
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
CATALYST
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
LEA
0
0
0
1
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
1
0
1
0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
1
1
1
1
0
D CONTENT
.990
.950
.980
.000
.990
.000
.100
.100
.000
.100
.200
.200
.900
.028
.990
.100
.990
.980
-100
.000
.990
.200
.990
-100
.100
.100
.990
.100
.000
.980
.000
.000
.000
.100
.970
0-17
-------
APPENDIX 0,CONT'D
LISTING OF FUEL LEAD CONTENT TEST RESULTS
AND NUMBER OF CATALYTIC CONVERTERS ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES
DENVER
VEH
NO.
857
858
859
860
861
862
863
864
076
077
078
079
080
081
082
083
084
085
086
087
088
089
090
091
092
093
094
095
096
097
098
099
100
390
395
YEAR
1973
1973
1973
1973
1973
1973
1973
1973
1972
1972
1972
1972
1972
1972
1972
1972
1972
1972
1972
1972
1972
1972
1972
1972
1972
1972
1972
1972
1972
1972
1972
1972
1972
1972
1972
MAKE
TOYO
TOYO
TOYO
SUBA
VOLK
VOLK
VOLK
VOLV
AMMO
BUIC
CADI
CHEV
CHEV
CHEV
CHEV
CHEV
CHEV
DODG
FORD
FORD
FORD
FORD
FORD
MERC
OLDS
PLYM
PLYM
PONT
PONT
DATS
TOYO
VOLK
VOLK
BUIC
CHEV
MODEL
STAW
CORO
STAW
STAW
.SEDA
SEDA
SEDA
142S
GREM
RIVI
DEVI
VEGA
MALI
CHEL
NOVA
IMPA
BELA
CORO
PINT
GRNT
MAVE
GALA
STAW
MONO
CUTL
VALI
FURY
CATA
LEMA
510
CORO
KARM
KOMB
SKYL
CHEL
CID
97
71
120
83
97
97
97
121
258
455
472
140
350
350
307
350
400
318
122
351
200
351
400
400
350
225
360
400
350
97
120
97
103
350
350
CATALYST
NO CONVERTER
NO CONVERTER
NO CONVERTER
NO CONVERTER
NO CONVERTER
NO CONVERTER
NO CONVERTER
NO CONVERTER
NO CONVERTER
NO CONVERTER
NO CONVERTER
NO CONVERTER
NO CONVERTER
NO CONVERTER
NO CONVERTER
NO CONVERTER
NO CONVERTER
NO CONVERTER
NO CONVERTER
NO CONVERTER
NO CONVERTER
NO CONVERTER
NO CONVERTER
NO CONVERTER
NO CONVERTER
NO CONVERTER
NO CONVERTER
NO CONVERTER
NO CONVERTER
NO CONVERTER
NO CONVERTER
NO CONVERTER
NO CONVERTER
NO CONVERTER
NO CONVERTER
LEAD CONTENT
1 .000
1 .000
0.980
1 .000
0.990
1 .200
1 .000
1 .000
0.960
0.950
1 .000
1 .000
1 .000
0.950
1 .200
0.920
0.950
1 .000
1 .200
1 .000
0.950
0.980
0.970
1 .000
0.150
1 .000
1 .000
0.970
0.027
0.950
0.980
1 .100
1 .100
1 .200
1 .000
0-18
-------
APPENDIX 0,CONT'D
LISTING OF FUEL LEAD CONTENT TEST RESULTS
AND NUMBER OF CATALYTIC CONVERTERS ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES
DENVER
VEH
NO.
396
398
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
409
410
411
865
866
867
868
869
870
871
872
873
874
875
876
877
878
879
880
881
882
883
884
885
886
887
YEAR
1972
1972
1972
1972
1972
1972
1972
1972
1972
1972
1972
1972
1972
1972
1972
1972
1972
1972
1972
1972
1972
1972
1972
1972
1972
1972
1972
1972
1972
1972
1972
1972
1972
1972
1972
MAKE
CHEV
CHRY
DODG
FORD
FORD
FORD
FORD
LINC
MERC
OLDS
PLYM
PONT
AMMO
AMMO
BUIC
BUIC
BUIC
BUIC
CADI
CADI
CHEV
CHEV
CHEV
CHEV
CHEV
CHEV
CHEV
CHEV
CHEV
CHEV
CHEV
CHEV
CHEV
CHEV
CHEV
MODEL
KING
NEWP
DART
PINT
MAVE
GALA
LTD
CONT
MONT
NNTY
VALI
GRNV
GREM
HORN
SKYL
LASA
LASA
LASA
DEVI
DEVI
VEGA
VEGA
VEGA
VEGA
NOVA
NOVA
CAMA
NOVA
NOVA
MALI
MALI
MALI
*. CHEL
MONT
NOVA
CID
350
400
318
122
302
351
429
460
351
455
318
455
232
232
350
350
350
455
472
472
140
140
140
140
307
250
307
350
350
307
307
307
350
350
350
(
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
CATALYST
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
LEA
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
1
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
D CONTENT
.000
.200
.000
.000
.100
.200
.990
.100
.980
.000
.000
.200
.100
.100
.000
.300
.200
.300
.000
.100
.000
.400
.200
.000
.000
.100
.950
.200
.100
.300
.100
.100
.000
.000
.000
0-19
-------
APPENDIX 0,CONT'D
LISTING OF FUEL LEAD CONTENT TEST RESULTS
AND NUMBER OF CATALYTIC CONVERTERS ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES
DENVER
VEH
NO.
888
889
890
891
892
893
894
895
896
897
898
899
900
901
902
903
904
905
906
907
908
909
910
911
912
913
914
915
916
917
918
919
920
921
922
YEAR
1972
1972
1972
1972
1972
1972
1972
1972
1972
1972
1972
1972
1972
1972
1972
1972
1972
1972
1972
1972
1972
1972
1972
1972
1972
1972
1972
1972
1972
1972
1972
1972
1972
1972
1972
MAKE
CHEV
CHEV
CHEV
CHEV
CHEV
CHEV
CHRY
DODG
DODG
DODG
DODG
FORD
FORD
FORD
FORD
FORD
FORD
FORD
FORD
FORD
FORD
FORD
FORD
FORD
MERC
MERC
OLDS
OLDS
OLDS
OLDS
OLDS
PLYM
PLYM
PLYM
PLYM
MODEL
IMPA
MONT
NOVA
MONT
JMPA
CHEL
NEWP
DART
DART
DART
POLA
PINT
PINT
PINT
MAVE
MUST
MAVE
MAVE
MAVE
GALA
STAW
LTD
LTD
GALA
COME
MONT
CUTL
CUTL
DELT
CUTL
DELT
VALI
DUST
SATE
SCAM
CID
400
350
350
400
400
454
400
225
225
318
360
122
98
98
200
351
302
302
250
400
351
429
400
400
250
351
350
350
350
350
455
198
225
318
318
CATALYST
NO CONVERTER
NO CONVERTER
NO CONVERTER
NO CONVERTER
NO CONVERTER
NO CONVERTER
NO CONVERTER
NO CONVERTER
NO CONVERTER
NO CONVERTER
NO CONVERTER
NO CONVERTER
NO CONVERTER
NO CONVERTER
NO CONVERTER
NO CONVERTER
NO CONVERTER
NO CONVERTER
NO CONVERTER
NO CONVERTER
NO CONVERTER
NO CONVERTER
NO CONVERTER
NO CONVERTER
NO CONVERTER
NO CONVERTER
NO CONVERTER
NO CONVERTER
NO CONVERTER
NO CONVERTER
NO CONVERTER
NO CONVERTER
NO CONVERTER
NO CONVERTER
NO CONVERTER
LEAD CONTENT
1.100
0.990
1 .100
1.100
1 .000
1 .200
1 .000
0.990
1 .200
1.100
0.990
1 .200
1 .100
1 .200
1 .200
0.990
1.500
1 .000
0.990
1 .200
1 .500
1 .000
1 .400
1 .100
0.990
1 .000
1 .500
0.019
1 .200
0.990
1 .000
1 .000
1.500
1 .000
1 .100
0-20
-------
APPENDIX 0,CONT'D
LISTING OF FUEL LEAD CONTENT TEST RESULTS
AND NUMBER OF CATALYTIC CONVERTERS ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES
DENVER
VEH
NO.
923
924
925
926
927
928
929.
930
931
932
933
934
935
936
YEAR
1972
1972
1972
1972
1972
1972
1972
1972
1972
1972
1972
1972
1972
1972
MAKE
PONT
PONT
PONT
PONT
PONT
CAPR
DATS
DATS
OPEL
TOYO
TOYO
VOLK
VOLK
VOLK
MODEL
VENT
STAW
LEMA
LEMA
CATA
COUP
B110
510
1900
CORO
STAW
SEDA
CONV
STAW
CID
350
350
350
400
400
98
72
97
116
71
97
97
97
103
CATALYST
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
1
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
CONVERTER
LEAD CONTENT
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
1
1
1
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.100
.000
.960
.200
.000
.960
.100
.000
.000
0-21
-------
0-22
------- |