ST. CROIX  RIVER

       a study of
 water quality and
benthic conditions
   in the st. croix
  river, grand falls
 to milltown, maine
and new brunswick
                         UNITED STATES
                  ENVIRONMENTAL  PROTECTION AGENCY
                           REGION I
                    BOSTON,  MASSACHUSETTS

-------
             ST. CROIX RIVER STUDY
                  AUGUST 1972
     A STUDY OF WATER QUALITY AND BENTHIC
       CONDITIONS IN THE ST-. CROIX RIVER
GRAND FALLS TO MILLTOWN, MAINE & NEW BRUNSWICK
     U. S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
                   REGION I
             BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS

-------
                    ACKNOWLEDGEMENT






     This report would not have been possible without the




close cooperation of the Canadian Environmental Protection




Service, Canadian Department of National Revenue, the




United States Custom Service, the United Stated Geological




Survey, the town of Woodland, Maine and the Environmental




Protection Agency's National Field Investigation Center,




National Maine Water Quality Laboratory, and Pacific




Northwest Environmental Research Laboratory.

-------
                         ST.  CROIX RIVER STUDY
                               AUGUST 1972
                                           u

                            TABLE OF CONTENTS

                                                    PAGE
  List of Tables                        •>             iv

  List of Figures                                     v

  List of Abbreviations                              vi

  I.   Conclusions                                  viii

 II.   Introduction                                    1.

      A.   Background                                  1.

      B.   Hydrology                                   2.

III.   Waste Sources                                   6.

      A.   Log Floating and Storage                    6.

      B.   The Georgia-Pacific Mill                    8.

      C.   Municipal Wastes                           13.

 IV.   Water Quality Study                            17.

      A.   Physical Parameters                        17.

          1.  Nonfilterable Residue                  17.

          2.  Turbidity                              26.

          3.  Color                                  27.

          4.  Temperature                            28.

      B.   Chemical Parameters                        29.

      C.   Toxicity                                   32.

      D.   Biology                                    37.

      E.   Bacteriology                               38.

  V.   Mathematical Modeling                          40.

  VI.   Discussion                                    43.
                                  ii

-------
                         ST. CROIX RIVER STUDY
                               AUGUST 1972
                     TABLE OF CONTENTS CONTINUED

                                                       PAGE

VII.  Appendices

      A.  Provisional Discharge Records for the         A-l
          St. Croix River at Baring, Maine

      B.  Time of Travel Study                          B-l
          St. Croix River, August 1972

      C.  Summary of Water Quality Data                 C-l
          St. Croix River, August 8-15, 1972

      D.  Isolation of Klebsiella pneumoniae            D-l
          St. Croix River Study

      E.  Qualitiative Biological Survey                E-l
          St. Croix River Study, August 1972

      F.  Report of Subsurface Investigation            F-l
          St. Croix River, Woodland, Maine

      G.  Diving Report                                 G-l
          Woodland Lake and Mill Pond
          Woodland, Maine

      H.  Sediment Oxygen Demand                        H-l
          St. Croix River, Maine - August 1972

      I.  A Study of the Toxicity of the Georgia-       1-1
          Pacific Pulp and Paper Mill Effluent in
          Woodland, Maine

      J.  In-situ Live Caged Fish Studies               J-l
          St. Croix River - August 1972

      K.  Histopathological Study of Atlantic           K-l
          Salmon Used in Bioassays at Georgia-Pacific
          Corporation and St. Croix River.

      L.  Development of a DO Deficit Model for the     L-l
          St. Croix River, Woodland - Milltown, Maine
                                   iii

-------
                        ST. CROIX RIVER STUDY
                             AUGUST 1972
                            LIST OF TABLES
TABLE                 DESCRIPTION                         PAGE

  1          St. Croix River Reservoir System                3
             Percent of Full Water Storage Capacity
             at Month's End.

  2          Quantities of Logs Consumed and Floated         7
             by Georgia-Pacific Corporation
           '  Woodland, Maine.

  3          Production at the Georgia-Pacific               9
             Corporation Mill, Woodland, Maine.

  4          Estimated Waste Flows from the Defoaming       12
             Lagoon at Georgia-Pacific Corporation
             Woodland, Maine.

  5          Summary of Analytical Results for              14
             Defoaming Lagoon's Effluent to the
             St. Croix River.

  6          Summary of Analytical Results for              16
             Baileyville's Municipal Wastes.

  7          Station Locations                           18-21
             St. Croix River Study - August 1972

  8          Summary of Water Quality Data               22-23
             St. Croix River, August 8-15, 1972

  9          The Concentration, Percent Survival and LT5Q   34
             Values for the Georgia-Pacific Effluent
             Using Fingerling Atlantic Salmon.

 10          Concentrations, Percent Survival and LT^Q      35
             Values of the Continuous Flow Bioassays
             Conducted with Georgia-Pacific Mill Effluent
             on August 12, 13 and 15, 1972 Using Atlantic
             Salmon.
                                iv

-------
                      ST.  CROIX RIVER  STUDY
                          AUGUST  1972
                         LIST OF FIGURES
 FIGURE t

    1

    2

    3

    4


    5

    6
    8

Foldout 1

Foldout 2
   DESCRIPTION

Basin Map - St. Croix River

Precipitation vs. Month

Mill Effluent Flow Diagram
FOLLOWING PAGE

        2

        2

       10
Average Total Non-Filterable Residue  26
Concentrations vs. River Miles
Mean Color Units vs. River Mile

Average BOD Concentrations vs.
River Mile
       28
       32
Average DO Concentrations vs. River   32
Mile

Locations of Live Fish Cages          36

Water Quality Stations              L-14

Biology Stations and Transects      L-14

-------
                   ST.  CROIX RIVER STUDY
                        AUGUST  1972
 TERM


 BOD5


 °C


 Cent.


 cfs


 DO


 Diss.


 EPA


 EPS


 Fit.


 Fix.

       O
 gm 62/m^/day


 G-P


 GSS


 IJC



 Jksn


 JTU


 LT50



mg/1
ml/1
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS



                     DEFINITION


   5-day biochemical oxygen demand


   degrees centigrade


   degrees centigrade


   cubic feet per second


   dissolved oxygen


   dissolved


   United States Environmental Protection Agency


   Canadian Environmental Protection Service


   filterable


   fixed


   grams per square meter per day


   Georgia-Pacific Corporation, Woodland, Maine


   Geophysical Survey Systems, North Billerica, MA.


   International Joint Commission (Canada-
   United States)


   Jackson


   Jackson Turbidity Units


   lethal time for 50% of bioassay test organisms,
   the  time in which 50% of the test organisms die.


   milligrams per liter


   million gallons per day


   milliliters per liter
                            vi

-------
                  ST. CROIX RIVER STUDY
                       AUGUST 1972
           LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS CONTINUED
TERM

Nflt.

PH


ppd

///day

Pt-Co. Units

SOD

SU

Temp.

Tot.

ug/1
                  DEFINITION
nonfilterable
the negative logarithm of the hydrogen
ion concentration

pounds per day

pounds per day

Platinum-Cobalt Units

sediment oxygen demand

Standard Units

temperature

total

micrograms per liter
                            vii

-------
                       ST. CROIX RIVER STUDY


                           AUGUST 1972
Conclusions
     1.  During the study the average river flow was approximately 500

         cfs higher than the 1968-1972 mean for August and five times

         higher than the l-in-10 year, 7-day low flow (480 cfs).

     2.  Because of high flows, water quality was much better than could

         normally be expected.

     3.  The practice of log floating and storage increases oxygen demands


         in Woodland Lake and Mill Pond.

     4.  Very little lateral mixing occurs in the St. Croix River from

         Woodland to Baring, Maine, .and wastes from Georgia-Pacific

         Corporation's mill which hug the U. S. bank have caused numerous

         sludge banks and bacterial slimes to develop.

     5.  Sludges in the river exert a substantial sediment oxygen demand,

         emit gases, rise and float on the river's surface.  Left in place


         these wastes continue to exert a demand which is not expected to
                                          A
         decrease to less than 2.0 gm 62/m /day.

     6.  Dilute solutions of mill effluent are chemically toxic to fish and

         toxicity is present many miles downstream from the point of


         discharge.

     7.  The number and kinds of bottom organisms confirm the polluted


         environment in the St. Croix River as a result of the Georgia-


         Pacific discharge.
                               viii

-------
 8.  Georgia-Pacific's effluent causes the temperatures in the




     St. Croix River to exceed the Federally-approved Maine Water




     Quality Standards.  Immediately downstream from the outfall, the




     average increase to ambient river temperature is 8.5 °C and steam




     was observed rising from the U. S. side of the river for approxi-




     mately two miles downstream.




 9.  Considering that the mill was operating at reduced capacity, the




     characteristics of Georgia-Pacific's waste have changed relatively




     little from the 1970 survey.




10.  Georgia-Pacific's effluent increases the color of the St. Croix




     River.




11.  To meet water quality standards for dissolved oxygen, Georgia-




     Pacific should eliminate log floating and log storage in the St.




     Croix River, maintain an instantaneous low flow above 750 cfs at




     Baring, Maine and maintain a maximum daily BOD loading of 10,000




     pounds per day during the four warmest months.
                              ix

-------
                        WATER QUALITY STUDY




                         ST. CROIX RIVER



                           AUGUST 1972






INTRODUCTION



     Background



     During August 1972, the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)




and the Canadian Environmental Protection Service (EPS) conducted a



comprehensive study of the water quality in the St. Croix River and its



effect on aquatic life.  The purpose of the study was to examine the




effects of log rafting, log storage, and pulp and paper making wastes




on the aquatic environment.  The study area was from Spednik Falls to the




international bridge at Milltown, Maine - New Brunswick (See Figure 1).




     On August 4 and 5, EPA conducted dye studies and aerial photography




work on the river to determine the time of travel from Woodland to Milltown.




From August 8 to 16, EPA studied the river water quality, benthos and




sediments and examined the effluent discharging from the Georgia-Pacific



Corporation's (G-P) mill at Woodland.  During the same period, EPS studied




the toxlcity of both the mill effluent and the diluted mill effluent in the




river.  From August 16 to 19, EPA visually examined the bottom conditions,




counted sunken logs, and measured the depth of accumulated debris In Mill



Pond and Woodland Lake.




     During the study period, river flows were approximately 500 cfs




higher than the mean August flow based on five years of record; the




Georgia-Pacific mill was on reduced production; and a construction project

-------
 for  repair of  the Woodland Dam was discharging  sediment  into  the

 Canadian side  of the  river.

 Hydrology

     According to the Water Resources Division,  U.  S.  Geological Survey

 (USGS), above  normal  precipitation fell  during  the  spring  and summer of

 1972.  Nine inches of rainfall were  recorded  at  Woodland in the  three

 month period preceding  the August study  (See  Figure 2).  On August  9,

 showers which  covered nearly all of  the  state moderately increased  flow

 in most streams.  However, because of extensive  stream flow regulation,

 the  St. Croix  River was virtually unaffected.   Excessive runoff  occurred

 in May, June,  and July.  In August runoff  returned  to  normal. The  ground-

 water table followed  a  similar pattern.

     The usable water storage capacity in  the St. Croix  River Basin's

 reservoir system is approximately 24 billion  cubic  feet.    During the

 three months preceding  the survey, the water  in  storage  averaged 91% of

 capacity.  The norm for the three months is 71%  of  capacity.   At the end

 of July, the basin storage capacity  was  84% full and during August  it

 dropped to 62%.  The  mean percentage for the  end of August, based on

 five years of  record, is 51%.  Table 1 is  a comparision  of month's  end

water in storage from May to September 1970-1972.

     Georgia-Pacific  Corporation and its subsidiary, the St.  Croix River

 Company, controls most of the storage in the  St. Croix River  Basin, partic-

ularly Spednik Lake and East Grand Lake.   Georgia-Pacific  Corporation's

Grand Falls Dam controls the storage in  Grand Falls Flowage and  regulated

 the  flow in the study area at all times, except  during freshets  when the
                                           *
 flowage is filled to  capacity.  During the study period, the  Georgia-Pacific

-------
SI  CROIX  RIVER  BASIN
                                            FIGURE

-------
6.0

5.0-



4.0-
§3.0 -

<
jjj
1.0-
fl 6.0-1
y\ /VERAGE MONTHLY PRECIPITATION FOR YEARS OF RECORD
/M 5-° '
//• TOTAL MONTHLY PRECIPITATION

E£J1 y
"4.0 -

















|
<
',
!
I
7 o
' pa r=3.O -
I
r
f
^
f
'
r
r
»<
r
/
r
t
t
,
>< 5
a g
i
4 7.0
^m e.o

MAY JUNE JULY AUGUST °-° '
1966 S
14.0 •
1
J
J5 3.0-
e
IL
£2.o-


1.0 •
6.0-
8.0-

n
E4.0-

1
§3.0-

•J2.0-




1.0-


0.0 -

















I
'/
\
y.
y
'/
y
V
y
\
y,
I
s.

s.
f.
'.
/.
',.
'.

'.
1
y

/
V
V
/
L ?
• X
1 ^
• v
rt rt •





™ K
^ t,
/ s
\ \
X X
,/ o
^ ^
X V
! 1
f-°-
1.0 -
0.0-























|
x
^
^
1

T
/
/
y
>
*
/
>
f
\

ry









MAY JUNE JULY AUGUST
1970



^
X ^
*i
y i ^
^ x
^ ?
' X
\ \ '1
MAY JUNE JULY AUGUST 8-0-
1972
UJ
g4.0-
z
1
:«
^
/
;f
t
',
',.
f
i
/
i
oS.O-

U2.0-




1.0-

ST. CROIX RIVER STUDY

MAY JUNE JULY AUGUST
1969
MAY- AUGUST 1968 TO 1972 °-0'1
PRECIPITATION VS. MONTH







































s
x
^
X
X
X
X
i.
/.

/
7

^




/.

^
X











1
/•
1
^H
-<•
/•
/•
'-1
//•
1
!<•
MAY JUNE JULY AUGUST
1971

-------
                            TABLE  1

                      ST. CROIX RIVER STUDY

                           AUGUST 1972

                ST. CROIX RIVER RESERVOIR SYSTEM*
      Percent of Full Water Storage Capacity at Month's End
                  May to September 1970 - 1972
                100% = 23. 579 billion cubic feet
MAY

JUNE

JULY

AUGUST

SEPTEMBER
 AVERAGE FOR
YEARS OF RECORD

      78

      71

      62

      51

      43
                                      1970
1971
1972
89
83
79
74
62
86
67
47
35
28
94
93
84
62
48
*  Based on "Current Water Resources in Maine".  Water Resources
   Division, U. S. Geological Survey in Cooperation with Maine
   Public Utilities Commission.

-------
 Corporation  could  regulate  the  flow in  the  study  area.


      The  International  Joint  Commission (IJC)  regulates  the  operation of


 the dams  at  East Grand  Lake and Spednik Lake using  broad guidelines  based


 on pool elevations  and  minimum  discharges.  The dam at East  Grand  Lake


 must  discharge water  at a rate  of  at least  75  cubic feet per second  (cfs)


 and Spednik  dam must  maintain a flow of 200 cfs.  No regulatory  require-


 ments have been established at  the downstream  dams.  The lack of strict


 regulatory, guides means that  the operation  of  the dam can randomly effect
          •

 large flow fluctuations in  the  St.  Croix River in a very short time.  Gage


 records show that dam operation, not rainfall, is the most significant


 factor affecting flow within  the study  area.   Taking into account  that


 historical flow records are biased  by dam regulation, the IJC established

                                                     2
 the minimum  l-in-10 year, 7-day low flow at 480 cfs.


      During  the past  five years the daily flow rates in  August ranged from


 868 cfs to 3810 cfs at  Baring.   The 1968 -  1972 mean daily flow  rate for


 August is 1720 cfs.   Because  of a wet spring and  summer  the  Spednik  and


 Grand Falls  Dams were releasing more water  than usual for August.  During


 August 4-16 the average daily flow rates  measured at the USGS  Gage,


 Baring, Maine varied  from 2290  - 2580 cfs with the  arithmetic mean being


 2410  cfs.  These flows  represent a  39%  increase over the same period in


 1971 and  35% more than  that of  1970.  Tables showing the average daily


 flow rates at the Baring gage for May to September  1968  - 1972 are in


Appendix A.


     Dye studies showed that  at a  river flow of approximately 2600 cfs,


wastes discharged by  G-P's  mill required approximately four  hours  to reach


the railroad bridge at  Baring and  a total of 11 hours to reach the Milltown

-------
                                              o
bridge.  Coastal Research Corporation's report  showed that little or no


lateral mixing occurs until the rapids at Baring, Maine.  Turbulent mix-


ing occurs at the Baring rapids and at the Milltown bridge, the dye is


well mixed across the river.  Further time of travel information is avail-


able in Appendix B.

-------
WASTE  SOURCES




     Pollutional  loadings  in  the St. Croix River within  the study area




may be attributed primarily to  three sources:  log  floating and  storage,




G-P's  mill and municipal waste  from Baileyville, Maine.




     Log Floating and  Storage




     The log floating  and  storage problem results  from the dumping of




pulpwood into the St.  Croix River.  The  logs are introduced from the




Canadian bank several  hundred yards downstream from  the  Grand Falls Dam.




The floating logs are  driven by current  and wind approximately  five miles




downstream to river storage sites near G-P's mill  at Woodland.  In addition




to the logs floated to wet storage, logs delivered to the mill site




by truck are transferred to river storage.




     During water transport and storage  the collision of logs abrades bark




and wood fiber.   Debris is removed when  the logs hit the water, and some




bark which may have been loosened before the logs  entered the river, breaks




free as it absorbs moisture.  As these bark particles and some  logs become




water saturated,  "water logged", they settle to the bottom, coat the natural




substrata, and decay.  The degradation of these sunken logs and particulates




creates an oxygen demand on the overlying waters.




     The Woodland mill uses deciduous and conifer  pulpwood for  its paper




production.  From 1968 - 1971, 257,777 cords were  floated from  the log




landings near Grand Falls Dam to the mill.  The floated  logs represent  13%




of the wood used by the mill in the four year  period.  Table 2  gives a




yearly breakdown  of the mill's total log consumption and floated logs.




     Research has shown that during the  log floating process sugars, tannins,




lignin precursors, degradation products, and cellulose like materials are

-------
                            TABLE  2
                      ST. CROIX RIVER STUDY
                           AUGUST 1972
             Quantities of Logs Consumed and Floated
         by Georgia-Pacific Corporation, Woodland, Maine
YEAR

1968

1969

1970

1971
CORDS PROCESSED

   514,540

   490,511

   515,187

   452,584
CORDS FLOATED

  77,559

  65,731

  61,254

  53,234
% FLOATED

   15.1

   13.4

   11.9

   11.8

-------
 leached to the carrying media.  »5  The leached materials  increase  color




 and cause an oxygen demand during degradation.   The  degree  to which



 this occurs is dependent upon multiple factors:   wood  type,  quantity,




 length of time in storage, etc.   The length of time  the logs remain  in




 wet storage varies with the production needs of  the  mill  and the number




 of logs supplied from dry storage,  truck and rail haul.   During the  study




 period, 44,000 cords were estimated to be in wet storage  at  Woodland Lake



 and Mill Pond.




      The Georgia-Pacific Mill




      G-P's mill,  which is located on the west bank of  the St. Croix  River




 at Woodland,  Maine,  produces kraft  pulp,  groundwood  pulp, and paper.  The



 mill uses deciduous  and conifer wood in its  production processes.  The mill




 is reported  to  be capable of processing  1400 cords  of peeled pulpwood and




 1200 cords of wood chips and produce 200  tons of unbleached  groundwood pulp,




 600 tons  of bleached softwood kraft pulp,  and 550 tons of paper daily.




      During most  of  the sampling  period,  the mill was  on  reduced production.




 At  the  start  of  the  sampling period,  reportedly  the  mill was operating at




 60-65 percent capacity  and by the end of  the period  was at full production.




 Table 3 lists production figures  during  the  study period.




     The mill discharges wastes at  two locations.  Waste water from  the




 log  flume  discharges near  the base  of Woodland Dan.  The main effluent,




 however,  is through  a defoaming lagoon located about 500 yards downstream.




     Georgia-Pacific's  main effluent  contains sanitary wastes and  process




wastes from pulp  and paper production.  The  sanitary wastes  receive  second-




ary  treatment in  an activated sludge  "package" plant.  The process wastes
                                  8

-------
                     TABLE  3

                ST. CROIX RIVER STUDY

                     AUGUST 1972

PRODUCTION AT THE GEORGIA-PACIFIC CORPORATION MILL
                  WOODLAND, MAINE
DATE
AUGUST

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
GROUNDWOOD
151
158
198
164
225
229
251
195
156
TONS
KRAFT PULP
561
328
536
553
652
496
488
500
419
NEWSPRINT
217
251
286
311
286
290
222
297
309
PRINTING :
124
	
18
112
99
118
121
122
90

-------
 receive primary clarification and portions of the Kraft mill wastes are




 treated for color removal.   Figure 3 is a schematic of effluent develop-




 ment.   The wastes combine in a catchbasin and are discharged through a




 defoaming lagoon to the St.  Croix River.




     As noted in the schematic,  wastes  from the Kraft mill's first stage




 caustic extraction is returned to the wood mill and then discharged to a




 color  clarifier utilizing lime coagulation.  The effluent is discharged to




 the  defoaming lagoon except  for  a relatively small amount which may be




 returned to a caustic sump.   The sludge from this unit is sent to a lime




 mud  washer for lime recovery.  The remaining liquid process  wastes are sent




 to a primary clarifier before discharge to the defoaming lagoon.  The sludge



 from the clarifier is vacuum filtered and burned in a bark incinerator.  For




 pH control the effluent from the color  clarifier and main clarifier are




 joined  by an acid waste stream prior to entering the defoaming lagoon.




     The term "defoaming lagoon" is  a misnomer.   The defoaming lagoon is a




 diked section of the river.   Its purpose  is to retain the foam which




 develops as  the  waste tumbles  down to the river elevation.   Waste retention




 time in  the  lagoon is estimated  as fourteen minutes and no treatment is




 provided to  remove or neutralize foaming  agents.  The lagoon's sole purpose




 is to retain  floating foam and present  a  more aesthetically  acceptable waste




 stream.  Waste leaves the lagoon via two  submerged 24" pipes.   Although very




 little foam  is visible immediately downstream from the mill, large masses




 of floating  foam attributable to the mill are evident after  the rapids




 downstream from  Milltown bridge  and following the rapids at  Baring.



     During  the  sampling period  the  mill's waste flow ranged between 30.7




and 32.4 million  gallons per  day (mgd).   The average daily rate was






                                 10

-------
FIRST  STAGE  CAUSTIC  EXTRACTION
NOS. 1-1-2
PAPER
MACHINE
»
1

NO. 4 PAPER
MACHINE
GROUNDWOOD
MILL
i - J ' -

i
V f
CAUSTIC
SUMP
^kk

1
  TO LIME
  RECOVERY
VACUUM
FILTER
                         i
                              I
                   MAIN   EFFLUENT
                      CLARIFIER
                                      KRAFT
                                       MILL
               SOLIDS  TO  BARK  DISPOSAL
                                    WATER
                                   TREATMENT
                                    PLANT
CAUSTICIZING
  PLANT
RECOVERY
 PLANT
                                                 ACID
                                                SUMP
                                               GEORGIA   PACIFIC
                                               WOODLAND, MAINE
                                            MILL   EFFLUENT  FLOW
                                                    DIAGRAM
                                           SANITARY
                                            WASTE
                                          TREATMENT
                                            PLANT
                                    LAGOON
      TO ST. CROIX RIVER

-------
 31.6 mp,d.  This represents approximately 2.0% of the average flow in the




 river.  Table 4 shows the daily flox^s as determined by three methods—




 integrator, planimeter, and Parshall flume.




     Initially flows were being measured at a Parshall flume prior to the




 defoaminp lagoon but foam entrainment caused the liquid level recorders to




 malfunction.  Subsequently daily flow readings were based on the amount of




 water entering the plant at G-P's Degremont building and North Filter.




 From flow charts for these intakes, G-P personnel calculated the daily flow




 using an integrator and a planimeter.  The planimeter usually gave the more




 conservative flows.  The flow values above are based on planimeter deter-




 minations.  Although some water is lost to evaporation and paper moisture




 content, the amount is negligible when compared to variations in flow




 measurements.  The daily waste loadings from the mill were calculated using




 the conservative flows.




     To determine the strength of the wastes being discharged, EPA personnel




 sampled the main effluent on a continuous twenty-four hour basis from




 August 8-16.  Sampling crews collected eight, twenty-four hour composite




 samples.  The sample increments were composited proportional to the flow




 recorded by the Parshall flume.  Although these flows were incorrect, the




 changes in flow volume remained proportional to the actual flow.  Thus, the




 volumes composited were proportional to the actual flow.   (A procedure




 agreed upon with mill officials.)  The composite samples were analyzed  for




 5-day biochemical oxygen demand (BOD5 ), k-rate BOD (1-5 days), true  color, and




 residues: total nonfilterable, fixed nonfilterable, total  filterable  and




 fixed filterable.  Dissolved oxygen, temperature, pH, and  settleable  solids




were determined regularly through the day.  In addition one grab sample per







                               11

-------
                               TABLE  A

                        ST. CROIX RIVER STUDY

                             AUGUST 1972

             Estimated Waste Flows From Defoaming Lagoon
          at Georgia-Pacific Corporation, Woodland, Maine
DATE
AUGUST
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
MEAN
INTAKE WATER1
PLANIMETER
30.8
30.7
30.8
31. 72
32. 43
31.4
32.1
32.5
31.6
F
CACULATED BY
INTEGRATOR
32.2
32.1
32.0
31.3
36.5
33.0
33.9
33.2
33.0
                                     FLOWS (MGD)
                                                    EFFLUENT RECORDED AT
                                                        PARSHALL FLUME

                                                            48.4

                                                            41.9

                                                            51.2

                                                            57.3

                                                            75.2

                                                            58.3

                                                            50.0

                                                            48.8

                                                            53.9
1   Sum of intake water at G-P's Degremont Bldg. and North Filter.

2   Includes 4.6 million gallons at North Filter calculated by integrator.

3   Includes 4.7 million gallons at North Filter calculated by integrator.
                                  12

-------
day was collected and analyzed for total and fecal coliforms and



Klebsiella.  A summary of these analyses is presented in Table 5 and



complete analytical results are in Appendix C.  Appendix D contains




Klebsiella data.



     Based upon the recorded daily flows and analytical results, the 6-P




mill discharges an average calculated BOD load of 54,000 pounds per day



(ppd) and 20,000 ppd suspended solids.  The pH was highly variable ranging




from a high of 11.3 to a low of 5.7 with the median being 7.5.  The waste



stream averaged 1350 color units and 33 Jackson turbidity units (JTU).



It also had a strong odor and the volume of foam in the lagoon increased



markedly as the study progressed.



     Municipal Wastes




     During 1972 the town of Baileyville (Woodland village) was constructing




a municipal waste treatment plant and installing new sewers which will




separate storm water runoff from domestic wastes.  At the time of the study,



the treatment plant was approximately 85% complete and not accepting any




wastes.  Many new sewers were completed but were not in use.  Formerly,




Baileyville discharged untreated municipal wastes to the St. Croix River




at three locations.  In August the sewers discharging to one of these




locations had been diverted, thus two outfalls accounted for the entire




untreated municipal combined flow.  The flow from the major portion of




the town was directed through an existing 18" combined sewer to the outfall



located approximately 500• downstream from the defearning lagoon discharge




at Georgia-Pacific Corporation and downstream from sampling station SC2U




(See fold-out map at back of report).  The remaining untreated wastes



were discharged through a 12" combined sever which terminated at an




untreated point farther down*tree*.




                                 13

-------
                      ST. CROIX RIVER STUDY
                           AUGUST 1972

                            TABLE  5

                SUMMARY OF ANALYTICAL RESULTS FOR
          DEFOAMING LAGOON EFFLUENT TO THE ST. CROIX RIVER
                          WOODLAND, MAINE
                          AUGUST 8-16
PARAMETER

Temperature (°C)

Dissolved Oxygen (ing/I)

pH (std. units)

Settleable solids (ml/1)

Color (plat, cobalt units)

Turbidity (JTU)

BOD  (mg/1)

Residues (mg/1)

    Total filterable

    Fixed filterable

    Total nonfilterable

    Fixed nonfilterable

Coliforms (#/100 ml)

    Total

    Fecal
MAXIMUM
43.0
6.7
11.3
3.0
1500
73
240
1249
845
102
56
59,000
16 ,000
MINIMUM
32.0
1.6
5.7
<0.1
1000
2
150
680
431
57
8
1200
100
MEAN
35.7
5.5
7.8
1.1
1375
36
205
912
601
76
30
6,100*
200*
                             *  Median value
                               14

-------
     Since no known industries contribute to the municipal sewers, the




18" sewer was considered representative of both discharges.  Each day,




August 8-11, samplers collected eight, hourly grab samples between 0600




and 1500 hours.  The sampling crew then combined increments of the grab




samples to get a representative composite sample which was analyzed for




BOD5, color, turbitity, and residues:  total nonfilterable, fixed non-




filterable, total filterable, and fixed filterable.  The results of these




analyses are found in Table 6.  In addition, each grab sample was tested




for settleable solids and one daily for total and fecal coliforms and




Klebsiella.




     The flow in each pipe was measured in catchbasins near the discharge




points.  A 90° V-notch weir was constructed for each sewer.  Flow in the




18" sewer was measured around the clock using an automatic liquid level




recorder.  The flow in the 12" sewer was measured hourly during the sampling




period.  Because these are combined sewers, the weirs became surcharged




following periods of intense rainfall, and in one instance, debris fouled




the float of the liquid level recorder.  The average combined waste flow




rate from both pipes approximated 0.25 mgd.




     Assuming that the concentrations in the 18" sewer was representative




of both sewers, the average 3005 loading was 185 ppd and total nonfilterable




residue averaged 16A ppd.  Both are negligible when compared to the




54,000 ppd BOD5 and 20,000 ppd nonfilterable residue from  the mill.  The pH




ranged from 6.3-8.8.  The median total and fecal coliform  densities were




1,300,000/100 ml and 50,000/100 ml, respectively.
                                 15

-------
             ST. CROIX RIVER STUDY
                  AUGUST 1972
                   TABLE  6
         SUMMARY OF ANALYTICAL RESULTS
      FOR BAILEYVILLE'S MUNICIPAL WASTES
PARAMETER                             MEAN VALUE

Temperature (°C)                        15.4

BOD5 (mg/1)                              104

pH (standard units)                      6.6

Turbidity (JTU)                           47

Residues (mg/1)

    Total filterable                   261.5

    Fixed filterable                   195.5

    Total nonfilterable                   59

    Fixed nonfilterable                   31

Coliforms per 100 ml

    Total                          1,000,000

    Fecal                             50,000
                       16

-------
WATER QUALITY STUDY



     Coincident with the sampling at Georgia-Pacific and Baileyville, EPA




personnel conducted a water quality sampling program in the St. Croix




River from Kellyland to Milltown, Maine.  Nine stations were selected




which would duplicate as nearly as possible the locations sampled in 1970




plus a station on the U. S. side of the river downstream from Woodland Dam




and upstream from Georgia-Pacific's main outfall.  Fold-out 1 at the rear




of the report locates the stations and Table 7 describes all stations




sampled.  Each station was sampled at least once every morning during




August 8-15.  Samples collected were analyzed for total and fecal coliforms,




DO, temperature, pH, BOD^, color, turbidity, residue:  total nonfilterable,




fixed nonfilterable, total filterable, and fixed filterable.  A second




sampling run for DO, temperature, and pH was made at most stations down-




stream from Woodland Lake.  Table 8 summarizes the results of those analyses,




Complete tables of results are in Appendix C.




     When discussing water quality, no parameter should be discussed in-




dependently of the others.  The interaction of one parameter with another




determines the quality or health of the water body, therefore, parameters




will be grouped and discussed in three categories:  physical, chemical, and




biological.




Physical Parameters




     Nonfilterable Residue



     Although the terms nonfilterable residue and settleable matter are




often used synonomously, Standard Methods for the Examination of Water




and Wastewater. Thirteenth Edition, differentiates between the two.  For
                                17

-------
                                                       TABLE  7
                                                  STATION LOCATIONS
                                                ST. CROIX RIVER STUDY
                                                      AUGUST 1972
                                                             te
                                               WATER QUALITY STATIONS
00
STATION
SCKU
SC01
SC2C
SC02
SC2U
SC2D
SC4C
SC04
SC4U
SC05
LATITUDE
o ' "
45 16 00
45 10 02
45 09 20
45 09 20
45 09 20
45 09 25
45 08 03
45 08 03
45 08 04
45 10 12
LONGITUDE
0 ' "
67 28 29
67 24 18
67 23 42
67 23 43
67 23 45
67 23 56
67 19 14
67 19 12
67 19 11
67 17 51
                            DESCRIPTION


Downstream from dam at Kellyland, Maine near USGS gage.

Railroad bridge at Woodland Junction, Maine.

500' downstream from defoaming lagoon outfall at Georgia-Pacific
Corp., one-quarter way from Canadian bank opposite Woodland, Maine.

500' downstream from defoaming lagoon outfall at Georgia-Pacific
Corp., midpoint in river, Woodland, Maine.

500* downstream from defoaming lagoon outfall at Georgia-Pacific
Corp., 50* from U.S. bank, Woodland, Maine.

500' upstream from defoaming lagoon outfall at Georgia-Pacific
Corp., 5' from U.S. bank ("Gunite" slope protection for G-P's
defoaming lagoon) Woodland, Maine.

One-quarter way off Canadian bank at railroad bridge, Upper Mill,
New Brunswick.

Midpoint in river at railroad bridge, Baring, Maine.

One-quarter way off U.S.A. bank at railroad bridge, Baring, Maine.

Midpoint in river at bridge Milltown, Maine - Milltown, New Brunswick,

-------
STATION     LATITUDE
            o
 SCB10
SCB11
SCB12*
SCB13C
SCB13U
SCB14C
SCB14M
SCB14U
SCB15C
            45 18 02
            45 17 59
            45 16 28
            45 12 35
SCB13M*     45 12 33
            45 12 32
            45 11 01
            45 10 56
            45 10 51
            45 10 41
LONGITUDE
o

67 27 40
67 28 05
67 29 49
67 25 52
                           67  25  55
67 25 58
67 24 32
67 24 39
67 24 44
67 23 54
                                                  TABLE  7
                                              STATION LOCATIONS
                                            ST. CROIX RIVER STUDY
                                                  AUGUST 1972
                                              BENTHOS STATIONS
                                                                       DESCRIPTION
St. Croix River 1,000' downstream from Landmark 175, three feet from
U.S.A. bank, T1R1, Maine.

St. Croix River 2,000' southwest of Landmark 175 near downstream tip
of island midpoint in river, T1R1, Maine.

Grand Falls Flowage midway between scow Point and point of land north-
west of Kellyland, Maine.

St. Croix River 5,000' downstream from Landmark 188 at log boom, 10'
from Canadian bank, Baileyville, Maine.

St. Croix River 5,000' downstream from Landmark 188, at log boom mid-
point in the river, Baileyville, Maine.

St. Croix River 5,000' downstream from Landmark 188, at log boom, 15'
from U.S.A. bank, Baileyville, Maine.

Woodland Pond 3,000' downstream from Landmark 191 one-quarter way from
Canadian bank.

Woodland Pond 3,000' downstream from Landmark 191 midpoint in river,
Baileyville, Maine.

Woodland Pond 3,000' downstream from Landmark 191 one-quarter way from
U.S.A. bank, Baileyville, Maine.

Woodland Pond 6,000' downstream from Landmark 191 one-quarter way from
Canadian bank.
         *  Benthic respiroaeter station

-------
STATION     LATITUDE
            o   '  "

SCB15M      45 10 36
N)
O
    SCB15U
    SCB16C
    SCB16M
    SCB16U
            45 10 32
            45 09 21
            45 09 21
            45 09 19
    SCB17C*     45 08 53
    SCB17M*     45 08 52
LONGITUDE
«  '  H
                              67 24 07
67 24 22
67 23 40
67 23 38
67 23 38
                          67 22 36
                          67 22 38
    SCB17U      45 08 52      67 22 43

    SCB18C*     45 07 57      67 19 23
                                                      TABLE  7
                                                 STATION LOCATIONS
                                                ST. CROIX RIVER STUDY
                                                     AUGUST 1972
                                                 BENTHOS STATIONS
                                                                              DESCRIPTION
    SCB18M
            45 07 55
67 19 16
Woodland Pond 6,000' downstream from Landmark 191, midpoint in river,
Baileyville, Maine.

Woodland Pond 6,000' downstream from Landmark 191, one-quarter way
from U.S.A. bank, Baileyville, Maine.

500' downstream from defearning lagoon outfall at Georgia-Pacific Corp.,
5' from Canadian bank opposite Woodland, Maine.

500' downstream from defearning lagoon outfall at Georgia-Pacific Corp.,
midpoint in river Woodland, Maine.                          '

700' downstream from defoaming lagoon outfall at Georgia-Pacific Corp.,
5* from U.S.A. bank Woodland, Maine.

1,000* downstream from Landmark 197, 5' from Canadian bank opposite
Baileyville, Maine.

1,000 downstream from Landmark 197, 500' downstream from Landmark 198,
midpoint in river near downstream tip of island, Baileyville,  Maine.

5' from U.S.A. bank opposite Landmark 198, Baileyville, Maine.

700' downstream from Landmarks 205 & 206, 20' from Canadian bank opposite
Baring, Maine.

800' downstream from Landmarks 205 & 206, midpoint in river at Baring,
Maine.
            *  Benthic respirometer station

-------
STATION
SCB18U
SCB19C
SCB19M*
SCB20C*
SCB20U*
SCB21M*
MC10*
GF01*
LATITUDE
o ' "
»
45 07 51
45 09 12
45 09 13
45 10 12
45 10 09
45 08 46
45 09 13
45 14 52
LONGITUDE
0 ' "
67 19 08
67 17 49
67 17 45
67 17 59
67 17 53
67 18 11
67 19 52
67 31 57
SCGP
SCB2
45 08 18
45 08 12
67 23 53


67 23 53
                                                   TABLE _ 7.
                                              STATION LOCATIONS
                                            ST. CROIX RIVER STUDY
                                                  AUGUST 1972
                                              BENTHOS STATIONS
                                                                       DESCRIPTION
 1,400'  east  of Landmark 206, 5'  from U.S.A. bank, Baring, Maine.

 10'  from Canadian bank opposite  Magurrewock Stream, Calais, Maine.

 Midpoint in  river opposite Magurrewock Stream, Calais, Maine.

 200' upstream from bridge at Milltown, Maine - Milltown, New Brunswick,
 5* from Canadian bank.

 200' upstream from bridge at Milltown, Maine - Milltown, New Brunswick,
 5' from U.S.A. bank.

 1700' downstream from Landmark 211 5* from Canadian bank opposite large
 island  in Baring Basin, Baring,  Maine.

 Midpoint in Mohannas Stream at "oxbow" in stream.

 Grand Falls Flowage near southerly tip of island west of Lamb's Place,
 Baileyville, Maine.

 POINT SOURCES

 River side of outfall from defoaming lagoon Georgia-Pacific Corp.,
Woodland, Maine.

 18" municipal combined sewer for Baileyville, Maine.
            Benthic respirometer station

-------
                                                                         TABLE   8
                                                               SUMMARY  OF WATER QUALITY  DATA
                                                                     ST. CROIX RIVER
                                                                    AUGUST  8-15,  1972
            Station
            SCKU
                                                                                                          Residue  mg/1
                                                                                                        Coliforms per 100 ml
            SC01
to
             SC2D
             SC2C
             SC02

MAX.
MIN.
MEAN
MAX.
MIN.
MEAN
MAX.
MIN.
MEAN
MAX.
MIN.
MEAN
MAX.
MIN.
MEAN
Temp.
°C
22.0
19.0
20.3
22.0
19.5
20.4
21.5
20.5
21.0
21.5
19.5
20.2
21.5
19.5
20.3
DO
mg/1
8.4
6.2
7.9
7.5
5.1
6.7
7.7
6.8
7.2
7.7
6.8
7.0
6.8
5.5
6.0
BOD5 pH
mg/1 standard
units
K 1.2
K 1.2
K 1.2
K 1.2
K 1.2
K 1.2
2.0
K 1.2
1.4
1.2
K 1.2
1.2
1.3
K 1.2
1.2
6.8
6.3
6.5
6.9
6.3
6.6
6.8
6.8

6.9
6.1
6.5
6.9
6.0
6.5
Color
Pt-Co
units
50
45
45
50
45
45
50
30
45
50
40
45
50
45
50
Turbidity
Jackson
Candle
1.0
0.7
0.9
1.1
0.6
0.7
6.5
0.9
2.6
14.0
0.8
5.1
19.0
0.8
4.1
Total
Diss.
45
21
31
52
19
35
55
6
30
68
8
33
50
11
34
Fixed
Diss.
27
2
17
38
4
20
52
1
19
30
1
16
32
9
19
Total
Nflt.
3
0
2
8
0
3
10
1
4
17
1
7
16
2
5
Fixed
Nflt.
3
0
1
3
0
1
10
0
3
16
0
6
16
1
4
Total
2500
560
1600*
2500
420
900*
4900
490
2200*
10,000
800
1300*
3100
920
2800*
Fecal
6
K 2
2*
K 10
K 2
K 2*
56
2
14*
10
K 2
4*
800
K 2
2*
             Mote:  "K" denotes
             * Median value
"less than"

-------
                                                        TABLE  8 CONTINUED
                                                   SUMMARY OF WATER QUALITY DATA
                                                          ST. CROIX RIVER
                                                        AUGUST 8 - 15, 1972
 Station
 SC2U
                                                                                               Residue  mg/1
Coliforms per 100 ml
 SC4C
SC04
SC40
SC05

MAX.
MIN.
MEAN
MAX.
MIN.
MEAN
MAX.
MIN.

MEAN
MAX.
MIN.
MEAN
MAX.
MIN.
MEAN
Temp.
°C
32.0
24.0
28.4
22.0
19.0
20.4
22.5
19.0

20.5
23.0
19.5
21.0
22.0
18.5 ,
19.9
DO
mg/1
7.1
4.1
5.9
7.0
5.6
6.4
7.3
5.8

6.3
6.2
5.1
5.7
6.2
4.9
5.8
BOD.
mg/15
190
40
104
3.5
1.4
2.3
3.5
2.0

2.8
9.0
4.6
6.7
5.2
2.8
3.9
PH
standard
units
9.6
5.9
7.8
6.9
6.3
6.6
6.9
6.3

6.6
7.2
6.4
6.7
6.8
6.0
6.4
Color
Pt-Co
units
500
1250
890
70
60
60
100
60

70
150
100
110
100
70
85
Turbidity
Jackson
Candle
72.5
1.4
21.1
4.6
2.0
3.0
3.8
2.1
*
2.9
4.9
2.8
3.3
7.8
2.3
4.4
Total
Diss.
820
400
540
75
14
45
71
23

53
94
53
76
80
26
57
Fixed
Diss.
570
280
380
58
12
30
36
12

28
67
25
49
53
1
36
Total
Nflt.
64
18
41
5
2
4
6
1

4
8
2
6
7
4
5
Fixed
Nflt.
25
6
17
5
0
2
3
0

2
6
0
2
6
1
3
Total
29,000
4,000
8,000*
6,900
900
32,000*
5,000
1,800

3,000*
7,900
3,100
5,000*
12,000
250
3,300*
Fecal
6,900
20
440*
1,000
K 10
30*
220
22

70*
2,400
80
190*
1,210
60
200*
* Median value

-------
the purpose of  this discussion, nonfilterable  residues  include  all matter

in suspension which will not pass a Gelman  type A  filter  or  equivalent,

and settleable  matter are  those nonfilterable  residues  which will settle

in a quiescent  body of water within one hour.

     Nonfilterable residues have a deleterious effect upon aquatic life.
Although their  chemical constituents may  in themselves  be harmful, the

more universal  danger lies in the deposition of residues  on  the bottom.

When materials  are deposited in sufficient  quanitites,  as in the St.  Croix

River, the bottom is blanketed.  The settling materials clog interstices

in gravel or rubble, ruin  spawning beds,  smother bottom organisms  (benthos),

and choke plant life and fauna.  These effects interrupt  the food chain

and directly eliminate energy sources for fish and higher life  forms.

     High concentrations of nonfilterable residues have an abrasive  action

upon the gill and respiratory passages of fish.  When fish have sustained

damage to their respiratory systems, low  concentrations of dissolved oxygen

and/or toxic substances can destroy fish  life.

     Wood fibers and other nonfilterable  residues abrade  and clog the gills

of fish.  They  interfere with its life processes.  They are  also harmful
                                                             Q
to the extent that they blanket the bottom  and decay.   Ellis0 has

recommended that all cellulose pulps and  sawdust be excluded from streams

and that the stream bottom not be blanketed to a depth  exceeding 0.25 inches.

Other studies have shown fish egg mortalities ranging from 36%  - 75% in

areas covered with fibers from mechanical pulping operations as compared
                                       Q
to 3% - 15% mortality in control areas.

-------
     Nonfilterable residues destroy aesthetic values and upon settling




create sludge beds which can hinder navigation.  Since these residues




contain organic material, the sludge settling to the bottom putrefies




and emits methane and hydrogen sulfide gases.  During the degradation




process, bacterial oxidation exerts a high oxygen demand on the overlying




waters.




     It is significant to note that dissolved or colloidal sized materials




may be synthesized by bacteria to form suspended or settleable sludges in




the form of biological or bacteriological slimes such as Sphaerotilus.




     EPA's 1972 study showed that the total nonfilterable residue in the




river ranged from 0.4-63.9 mg/1.  The average values gradually increased




from Kellyland to Woodland, Maine (See Figure 4).  The average concentration




in the U. S. side of the river increased 900% (4.1 mg/1 at station SC2D to




38.5 mg/1 at SC2U) immediately following G-P's defearning lagoon discharge,




and then declines in the downstream study area.  EPA's biologists noted




that sludge from paper wastes created a toxic environment at a point 700




feet downstream from the mill discharge and observed Sphaerotilus approximately




1.0 mile downstream (See Appendix E).  Coastal Research Corporation's report




provides no specific reference to sludge deposits downstream from the mill




because "the majority of the Maine side of the river has sludge deposits in




it."  The sludge was apparently putrefying because sludge mats had broken




from the bottom and were floating on the surface.  Divers from EPA's




Cincinnati Field Investigation Center observed gas bubbles rising to  the




water surface in Baring Basin.







                                25

-------
      Scuba divers and biologists  reported  that  the  river  bottom  from Spednik




 Falls to Milltown bridge contained  wood  fibers  and  bark which  had  been




 abraded from logs.  Upstream from Kellyland,  the  bottom appeared to  be




 covered with a thin layer of floe and marl but  did  not  contain any logging




 debris.




      In Woodland  Lake and Mill  Pond,  logs, wood fiber,  bark, and a floe




 material littered the bottom.   Gas  bubbles rose from the  sediments.   A




 study by Geophysical Survey  Systems,  Inc.  (GSS) determined  the depth of




 logs  and debris in the log storage  areas (See Appendix  F).  GSS  reported




 logs  layered one  to three feet  thick  over  80% of  the areas  examined.  Some




 log deposits were four to five  feet thick.  Appendix G  is a diving report




 which estimates log layerings and confirms the  GSS  findings.




 Turbidity




      Turbidity is an expression of  the optical  property of  a water to




 absorb  and disperse light.   It  is caused by emulsions and/or suspended




 matter  such  as clays,  silt,  bacteria, plankton, and finely  divided organic




 matter which interrupt  the light  path and  reduce  light  penetration.




      Turbidity levels  in  the St.  Croix River  parallel the nonfilterable




 residue  concentrations.   Average  turbidities  upstream from  the dam at




 Woodland remained less  than  1.0 JTU.  The  analysis  of stations downstream




 from  the dam not  affected by G-P's  main effluent  (SC2D, SC02,  and  SC2C)




 showed Increases  in turbidity.  The increases at  SC02 and SC2C can be




attributed to silt  washing into the river  from  dam  reconstruction  activities




on the Canadian side.  At SC2D  the  increase is  attributable to the log




 flume and the wet  storage area  at the mill.   Downstream from G-P's discharge
                                    26

-------
  10.0 -i
m

o
  9.0
lit
o
  8.0 -
O
u
in
ui
K


hi
6.0 •
  3.0 •
  4.0 -
  3.0 •
  1.0 -
 0.0
          o
          A

          o
CANADA

MIDSTREAM

UNITED STATES
     30
         29     28
                        27     26
                                    23
                                          24
                          23     22     21

                            RIVER MILES
                            R.R. BRIDGE WOODLAND JCT.   MILL WASTE
                                                                     20      19     18
                                                                         R.R BRIDGE BARING ME.
17
                                                                                                 16
15
                                                                                          BRIDGE AT MILLTOWN
                                            ST.  CROIX RIVER STUDY

                                                 AUGUST 1972

              AVERAGE  TOTAL NON-FILTER ABLE  RESIDUE  CONCENTRATION  VS.  RIVER MILES

-------
(station SC2U), the average turbidity on the U. S. side of the river




increased ten-fold.  This is directly attributable to the nonfilterable res-




idues  discharged by the mill.  From the mill downstream to Milltown bridge,




turbidity averaged more than 2.9 JTU at all stations sampled.




     Color



     Color in water may be of organic or mineral origin.  True color is




defined as color caused by dissolved matter and is measured after suspended




materials have been removed.  For purposes of comparison, one standard color




unit has been defined as the color imparted to distilled water by a 1.0 mg/1




dissolved platinum concentration.




     Color affects the ability of certain wave lengths of light to penetrate




water.  Unlike turibidity which also disperses the light rays, colors,




especially browns and grays, absorb the light energy.  In so doing, the




light intensity diminshes and the absorbed energy increases the tempera-




ture of the water.  Color retards photosynthesis and may have a deleterious




effect upon aquatic life, particularly phytoplankton, and the benthos.




     The St. Croix River, even in the control areas, is highly colored,




averaging nearly 50 color units.  The high color can be attributed  to




drainage from swamps and forested areas.  Starting upstream at Kellyland




and coming downstream, the color of the water remained uniform until  the




water passed the G-P mill.  The pulp and paper industry has long  been




recognized as a major contributor of color to the nation's waterways,




and Georgia-Pacific Corporation is no exception.  Downstream  from the




mill (station SC2U) the color averaged 850 units.  Continuing downstream




the highest color values occurred on the U. S. side  of  the river.  At




Milltown bridge the color averaged 85 units.  Figure 5  is a  representation




of mean color units in the study area.




                                27

-------
 Temperature




      Temperature  is  an  important  regulator  of  natural  processes  in aquatic




 ecosystems.   Changes in temperature  control,  the  physiological functions




 within  the  biosystem, both  by  altering  the  physical  and  chemical character




 of  the  environment and  by directly affecting  the  life  organs  of  aquatic




 animals and plants.   Each species has its own  unique thermal  requirements,




 so  that a given change  in water temperature will  have  a  broad range of




 effects upon  the  organisms  within the water body.  Therefore, the thermal




 regime  of a water ecosystem controls the community structure  and food




 chain relationships.11•12




     Elevated  temperature has  the following significant  observable effects:




 (1) decreased  solubility of oxygen;  (2) increased metabolism  and respiration,




 resulting in an increased demand  for the diminished  dissolved oxygen;  (3)




 increased ability for enteric, including pathogenic, bacteria to survive




 in  the  water;  (4) increased toxicity of certain substances;  (5)  inability




 of  certain  species'  organs  to  function properly resulting  in  failure to




 reproduce or death;  (6) increased growth of sewage fungus  and putrefaction




 of  sludge deposits and  (7)  a shift (rejuvenation) of the ecological compo-




 sition  of sludge  deposits in favor of "pollution-tolerant" organisms which




 are better able to compete  for a  given niche in the  aquatic environment.




     Because increased  temperatures  have such  a profound influence on  the




biological support system,  considerable research  has been  done to determine




acceptable  temperature  limits.  Maine has established  a  maximum  temperature




limit of 28.5°C in waters designated to support a warm water  fishery (bass,




pickerel, perch)  and 20.0°C to support a cold  water  fishery  (trout and






                                28

-------
                                                  PEAKS AT 860
t!
§
O
o
<
UJ
   110
   100
   90 -
   60 •
   70  -
   60 •
   50 •
   40  -
   30  -
O
A
D
CANADA
MIDSTREAM
UNITED STATES
   20  -
   10  -
      30     29     28     27
                      26     25
                        24
23      22
  RIVER MILES
21      20
                               R.R. BRIDGE WOODLAND JCT.     MILL WASTE
                                                                   18
                                                                             R.R. BRIDGE BARING ME.
17
                                                                                                           16
                                                                                                                  IS
                                                                                                     BRIDGE AT MILLTOWN
                                                 ST CROIX  RIVER  STUDY
                                                       AUGUST 1972
                                          MEAN COLOR UNITS VS.  RIVER  MILES

-------
salmon).13  Historically, the St.  Croix River is a cold water fishery




and the intent is to continue to operate the river as one.




     Except for the U.  S. side of  the river immediately downstream from




the defoaming lagoon outfall, average river temperatures remained near




20°C.  Immediately downstream from the outfall, the average temperature




jumped to 28°C and ranged from 23°C to 32°C.  Fish studies performed by




the Canadian Environmental Protection Service showed that fish placed in




the river immediately downstream from the mill died in seconds apparently




from thermal shock.  During reconnaissance studies, boat crews observed




steam rising from the U. S. side of the river nearly 2.0 miles downstream




from the mill.




Chemical Parameters




     Dissolved Oxygen (DO), Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD), and Sediment




     Oxygen Demand (SOD)




     Dissolved oxygen,  BOD, and SOD are so interrelated that all must be




treated within the same discussion.




     Biochemical oxygen demand is a laboratory test which measures the




quantity of oxygen consumed by bacteria and interim chemical reactions for




the degradation of organic matter in water under controlled conditions




for a specified time.  Sediment oxygen demand is a measure of the dissolved




oxygen being utilized for the stabilization of organic matter in sediment




deposits.  The numerical values of BOD and SOD are not significant per se,




rather, they are indices of the degradability or "strength" and are  only




important insofar as they relate to oxygen balances in a  stream.
                                29

-------
     Dissolved oxygen may be introduced into a stream by the tumbling of


water over rocks, dams, and riffles, the molecular diffusion of oxygen


from air at the water-air interface, and photosynthesis by plant life.


     Oxygen is important in maintaining a healthy fish population.  It is


also important for the degradation of wastes because aerobic bacteria more


quickly stabilize wastes than anaerobic bacteria.  Also, aerobic digestion


does not produce foul odors.  The amount of oxygen necessary to maintain


fish life varies with the fish species to be maintained.  The recommended


limits may be specified as a percent of the saturation value (which is


temperature dependent) and/or a minimum concentration.  The Federally-


approved Maine Water Quality Standards specify, "The dissolved oxygen


content of such waters (St. Croix River) shall not be less than 5 parts
                                                 »

per million for trout and salmon waters."


     The amount of organic wastes a stream can safely assimilate is


dependent upon maintaining an oxygen balance in the stream.  The amount


of oxygen consumed to satisfy chemical and/or biological demands must


not exceed the reaeration necessary to maintain favorable conditions.


A way to control the rate at which oxygen is consumed is to reduce the


concentration of the waste in the stream.  This may be done by accelerating


the degradation process in a controlled system (waste water treatment) prior



to discharging the waste.


     Examination of BOD and SOD and their affect upon DO in a stream


should be made during low flow conditions.  During low flow conditions,


the dilution factor is minimized, reaeration rates are usually minimized



and the residence time in a reach maximized.  Also, low flow conditions
                                 30

-------
usually occur in the late summer months when water temperatures are at


their maximum.  Maine's criteria13 specifies that the l-in-10-year,


7-day low flow should be used for determining the assimilative capacity


of a stream.

     As stated previously, during the study period flows in the river


averaged 2410 cfs which was approximately 500 cfs higher than that exper-


ienced in 1970 and nearly 2000 cfs more than the l-in-10-year, 7-day low


flow of 480 cfs.


     The BOD5 at the stations upstream from Woodland Dam never exceeded 1.2


mg/1.  On the Canadian side of the river and midstream downstream from the


dam at Woodland, Maine the average BOD5 remained at less than 1.2 mg/1.


However, at station SC2D a slight increase was observed.  Downstream from


the main outfall, the average was 92 mg/1.  Further downstream at the


railroad bridge at Baring, Maine the 8005 on the U. S. side of the river


ranged from 4-6 - 9.0 mg/1.  Figure 6 presents the average BOD5 values in


the river.


     The SOD data collected (Appendix H) show an average oxygen demand of

                                           o
2.3 grams per square meter per day (gm 02/m /day) in the control areas of


the St. Croix River and Grand Falls Flowage.  As a result of photosynthesis


supplying more oxygen than bacteria were consuming a negative demand was


observed in Mohannas Stream.  In the log storage areas, the SOD increased


from 2.3 gm 02/m2/day in the control areas to approximately 2.7 gm 02/m2/day


in Woodland Lake.  Associated with this increase was an average DO reduction


of 1.5 mg/1 from Kellyland to the railroad bridge at Woodland junction.


Approximately 1.25 miles downstream from the mill (transect SCB17) the


sediment oxygen demand jumped from an average of 2.7 gra 02/m2/day  in
                                 31

-------
Woodland Lake (station SCB15M) to an average of 6.7 gm 02/m^/day.


Near Milltown bridge the average SOD dropped to 2.6 gm C^/m^/day or nearly


the same as that which occurs at SCB15M.


     The sunken debris caused by log storage in Woodland Lake and Mill

                                                              f\
Pond represents a substantial pollution load.  The 0.4 gm 02/m /day increase


in SOD when distributed over the downstream portion of Woodland Lake and


Mill Pond removes 2400 pounds of dissolved oxygen from the overlying water


daily.  If the overlying water is not reaerated or exchanged, severe oxygen


depeletions can occur.  Such depletions occur during low stream flow


conditions.  For instance, in August 1970, when the average flow was approx-


imately 1900 cfs, the mean DO under the railroad bridge at Woodland junction

                   2
(SC01) was 4.5 mg/1 , 0.5 mg/1 less than the 5.0 rag/1 established by the


Federally approved Maine Water Quality Standards.


     Analysis of the 1972 data shows that a slight, but significant


depression occurs in Woodland Lake.  The mean DO decreases from 7.9 mg/1


downstream from Grand Falls Dam (SCKU) to 6.7 mg/1 at SC01.  Comparing


DO's at SCKU and SC01 on a day-to-day basis, the DO in Woodland Lake was


consistently lower although the temperatures at the two stations never

                    0
varied more than 0.5 C.


     The most severe DO depression occurred immediately downstream from


Georgia-Pacific's outfall (SC2U).  At this station, the DO's ranged from


4.1 - 7.1 mg/1, and averaged 5.9 mg/1.  The mean DO values at SC4U and SC05


were 5.7 mg/1 and 5.8 mg/1 respectively.  Figure 7 represents the mean DO


concentrations reported during the study.


Toxicity


     To determine the toxicity of G-P's wastes, the Canadian Environmental
                                 32

-------
10.0
 9.0
8.0
7.0
K
z 6.0 -
u
u
o
0 5.0 H
in
d
d
to 4.0 -j
UJ
(9
P. 3.0 H
2.0 •
1.0 -
                                             PEAKS AT 140,0
0.0
          O
          A
          D
CANADA
MIDSTREAM
UNITED STATES
    30     29     28     27
         [       I ,
        26      29
                                               24
23     22     21
  RIVER MILES
                                                                         20
T
19
                                                                                       18
                           RR. BRIDGE WOODLAND JCT.    MILL WASTE
                                                                                              17
                                                                              16
                                                                                                             IS
                                                                        R.R. BRIDGE BARING ME.
                                                                                              BRIDGE AT MILLTOWN
                                             ST.  CROIX  RIVER  STUDY
                                                  AUGUST 1972
                             AVERAGE B.O.Dg CONCENTRATIONS  VS. RIVER  MILES

-------
   8.0
   7.0 •
w

o
(E
yj
o
O
o
o

Q
ui
(9
U
   6.0 H
   5.0
                                                             1D-
                                     5 MG/L  I.J.C.  OBJECTIVE  AND  MAINE STANDARD
  4.0 -
  0.0
                               O 	 CANADA

                               £ 	 MIDSTREAM

                               D 	UNITED STATES
      30     29     28     27      26      29
                                                          24
 I       I      I      I       U      I       I       f

23     22      21      20      19      18      17     16

  RIVER MILES
                              R.R. BRIDGE WOODLAND OCT.    MILL WASTE
                                                                           R.R. BRIDGE BARING ME.
IS
                                                                                                BRIDGE AT MILLTOWN
T]
O
c
3D
m
                                              ST.  CROIX RIVER STUDY
                                                    AUGUST 1972

                               AVERAGE  D.O. CONCENTRATIONS  VS. RIVER MILES

-------
Protection Service (EPS) conducted three kinds of live fish bioassays:




1.  semi-static, 2.  continuous flow, and 3.  in-situ.  All bioassays




showed that G-P's wastes were highly toxic.




     EPS personnel conducted the semi-static and continuous flow bioassays




using effluent from G-P's defoaming lagoon diluted with water taken from Grand




Falls Flowage at Grand Falls Dam.  In the semi-static tests, fish were




placed in tanks containing 100, 56, 32 and 17 percent effluent.  Fish were




also placed in control tanks which contained no effluent.  Every twenty-four




hours, 50 percent of the solution in each tank was removed and replaced with




fresh solution of like concentration.  In this test, all fish subjected to




waters containing 17 percent effluent died in less than eighty-five hours,




while those in higher effluent concentrations died even sooner.  All fish




in the control tanks, zero percent effluent, survived more than the 96




hours alloted for the test.  Table 9 shows the results of the semi-static




bioassay and Appendix I is a detailed report of the bioassays.




     Sets of continuous flow bioassays were run on August 12, 13 and 15.




Fresh river water from Grand Falls Flowage and fresh effluent were continually




pumped into various tanks to make up test solutions containing 75, 65, 50, 35




and 25 percent effluent.  In addition, control tanks were run which received



only river water.




     All fish placed in control tanks survived longer than the 96-hours




specified for the tests.  Only in one other tank did any fish survive more




than 96 hours.  In one of two 25% effluent tanks tested, 8"0% of the fish




survived the test.  In the remaining tanks, 100% mortality occurred in less




than 40 hqurs.  Table 10 summarizes the test results and Appendix I details




the bioassays and results.
                                33

-------
                        Table 9

THE CONCENTRATION, PERCENT SURVIVAL AND LT50 VALUES FOR THE
 GEORGIA-PACIFIC EFFLUENT USING FINGERLING ATLANTIC SALMON
CONCENTRATION (%)
100
100
56
56
56
56
32
32
32
17
17
Control
Control
Control
% SURVIVAL
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
100
100
100
LT50 (HOURS)
12
9.7
22
17
23
34
34
40
62 X
76
37 2
96
96
96
1  No explanation has been presented for the anomolous LT50
   in the 32% concentration.  Since the pH agrees with those
   of the other two 32% tests, it must be assumed that the
   initial concentration was 32%.  The recorded pH at 48 hours,
   however, was lower than that of the other two.

2  In the case of the 17% effluent bioassay, the operator found
   that an air valve was working improperly, thus creating an
   artifact in the toxicity.
                           34

-------
                     TABLE  10

 CONCENTRATIONS, PERCENT SURVIVAL AND LT50 VALUES OF
   THE CONTINUOUS FLOW BIOASSAYS CONDUCTED WITH
  GEORGIA-PACIFIC MILL EFFLUENT ON AUGUST 12, 13
        and 15, 1972 USING ATLANTIC SALMON
CONCENTRATION %	% SURVIVAL	LT50 (HOURS)

     75                       0                  8.2

     50                       0                 12

     25                       0                 18

     75                       0                 20

     50                       0                 27

     25                      80

     65                       0                 17

     35                       0                 27
                        35

-------
      In  addition  to  the bioassays performed on  the mill's  effluent,  live

 fish  cages were placed at  five  locations  in the river  basin  (See  Figure 8).

 All fish placed in cages downstream  from  the mill died in  less  than  80.5

 hours while all those upstream  survived more than 96.0 hours.   An exception

 to this  was a group  of caged  fish which was left without water  when  the

 gates at the Kellyland Dam were closed.   Fish placed in the  St. Croix  River

 on the U. S. side 400 yards downstream from the effluent discharge died in

 seconds  probably  from thermal shock.  At  Bailey Rips 1.5 miles  downstream

 from  the mill, severe toxicity  was indicated.   One-hundred percent mortality

 occurred in 80.5 hours at  Milltown bridge.  Temperature was  not termed a

 limiting factor at Bailey  Rips  nor Milltown bridge.  Appendix J is a more

 descriptive presentation of the insitu fish cage studies.

     The fish which  died during the  bioassay studies were  preserved  and

 transported to EPA's National Marine Water Quality Laboratory at  West

 Kingston, Rhode Island for histopathological examinations.

     The examinations showed  that the olfactory organs (smell)  had lesions

 present.  Salmon exposed for  more than twenty hours were usually  severely

 affected.  Rapid death of  an  organism does not  allow enzymatic  changes to

 occur in cells which will  allor recognition of  cause of death by  microscopy.

This may explain the absence  of lesions in some groups.  As  stated in

Appendix K:

     The prime function of the  chemoreceptive organs are to  convey
     information concerning changes  in the chemical composition of
     the internal and external  environment to the higher centers  of
     the central nervous system for  correlation.  These sensory imputs
     allow the organism to alter behavioral patterns by adjusting their
     internal physiological or  biochemical mechanisms  to cope with a
     changing environment.  Chemoreception in the salmon is  vital to
     their orientation and migration into "home streams",  and therefore,
     is vital to successful reproduction  and propagation of  the species.
                                 36

-------
                                                 MILES
                                          0AM SITES
UNITED STATES
                         WOODLAND
                           ST  CROIX RIVER
                    LOCATION OF LIVE FISH CAGES
                                                                   FIGURE 8

-------
Biology



     EPA's biologists examined portions of the St. Croix River for benthic




invertebrates.  Benthic invertebrates (benthos) are those organisms living




in and crawling on the bottom.  The log covered substratum in the running




water at the upstream end of the log storage area (transect SCB13) did not




exhibit a deterioration of benthic populations when compared to the upstream




control stations.  SCB13U and SCB13C have 9 and 14 kinds of benthos respect-




ively compared to 12-19 kinds at river control stations.  However, decreased




benthos diversities at treansects SCB14 and SCB15 in Woodland Lake indicate




degradation.  Four to seven kinds of organisms were present compared to




seventeen kinds at the Grand Falls Flowage control station.  Organisms found




in Woodland Lake are typified as moderately pollution tolerant.




     The U. S. side of the St. Croix River 700 feet downstream from Georgia-




Pacific's outfall was devoid of benthos, but on the Canadian side bottom




organisms flourished.  This two natured aspect of the river continued for




at least one mile downstream.




     On the U. S. side of the river offensive smelling bacteriological




slime, filamentous bacterium, was accumulating on the bottom (station SCB17U)




approximately 1.0 miles downstream from the mill.  This gray slime thrives




in organically enriched waters and is toxic to clean water organisms.  Only




the pollution tolerant sludgeworm Tubificidae was found at SCB17U.




     Fast water, rapids, and island cause lateral mixing downstream, result-




ing in degradation of benthos midstream and on the Canadian side.  Although




the river begins to recover, degradation still remains present approximately




six miles downstream from the mill.  A more complete presentation of the




biological examinations can be found in Appendix  E.
                                 37

-------
Bacteriology




     Water polluted by wastes from warm-blooded animals and humans frequently



contains pathogenic (disease causing) organisms.  Because of  the difficulty



in identifying pathogens, coliform bacteria are used as indicator organisms.



Their presence indicates that pathogenic organisms are probably present.



The presence of coliforms in sufficient numbers excludes the  use of a water




for drinking, water contact recreation, and, in the case of an estuary,  the



harvesting of shellfish.  Because of  this, the State of Maine in their


                                          12
Federally approved Water Quality Standards   established a maximum limit of




5,000 total coliform per 100 milliliters and 1,000 fecal coliforms per 100




milliliters for the St. Croix River downstream from Woodland.



     Coliform bacteria are generally  analyzed in  two categories:  total



coliforms and fecal coliforms.  Total coliforms may originate in soils as




well as from warm-blooded animals.  Fecal coliforms on the other hand usually




originate in the intestinal tract of warm-blooded animals.  Therefore, the



presence of fecal coliforms is indicative of fecal contamination.  During the



August study, fecal coliforms exceeded the established criteria on one day,




August 10.  On this day, 6,900 and 2,400 fecal coliforms were recorded at




stations SC2U and SC4U respectively.  Station SC2U is downstream from the



defoaming lagoon outfall and upstream from the municipal outfalls.  Station




SC4U is at Baring.  The total coliform standard was generally exceeded at




station SC2U and  occasionally exceeded at stations farther downstream.  At




stations upstream from SC2U coliform  criteria were not exceeded.




     In addition to analyzing for total and fecal coliforms,  analyses were




conducted at selected stations to isolate the coliform genus  Klebsiella.




Research by EPA's Corvallis and Duluth laboratories isolated  members of  the
                                 38

-------
genus Klebsiella in pulp and paper mill effluents.  Klebsiella are not only




an indicator of pathogens but some members of the genus are themselves




pathogenic.  Klebsiella are present in human fecal matter and were used as




indicators of fecal pollution before being replaced by fecal coliforms.




Klebsiella are often the cause of septicemia, pneumonia and post-operative




infections.  They rank second to Escherichia coli, as fecal coliform, as




causative agents in urinary tract infections.  In view of these fects, the




presence of Klebsiella pneumoniae in water has as great a significance as the




presence of Escherichia coli.




     Klebsiella pneumoniae was isolated from the mill effluent in all




effluent samples collected.  Samples from the Baileyville municipal wastes




also contained Klebsiella pneumoniae and Klebsiella were isolated from the




river at Baring and Milltown (stations SC04 and SC05).  Because all samples




collected from the river upstream from the G-P mill failed to isolate this




organism, the river was discounted as a background source of Klebsiella.




     Further testing showed that Baileyville's wastes were not responsible




for the presence of Klebsiella at Baring and Milltown.  Capsular types




isolated at SC04 and SC05 matched capsular types isolated from the mill




effluent and not those from the municipal wastes.  Although the source of




Klebsiella within the mill complex is impossible to determine, their presence




in the river downstream from the mill discharge is attributable to the mill




effluent.




     Appendix D is a more thorough presentation of Klebsiella's significance



and test results.
                                 39

-------
MATHEMATICAL MODELING

     The data from any sampling program are specific.  That is, the

information compiled pertains only to the time, flow, waste strengths,

temperature and all other interrelated factors at the time of collection.

Being an active and vital environment, a water body and its constituents

are constantly changing.  Continually sampling a water body to compile

information for every possible condition is impossible, but duplicating

environmental conditions with matematical equations, which represent known

conditions, can be run on a computer to provide good approximations of what

conditions would be as factors are varied.

     Because the formulation of the model is somewhat complex, only a brief

summary will be presented here and a more complete presentation is in

Appendix L.

     Based on information collected during the August 1972 study, EPA's

Systems Analysis Branch developed a model for approximating dissolved

oxygen concentrations in the portion of the St. Croix River from Woodland

Dam to the Milltown bridge.

     Dissolved oxygen deficits in the stream, waste loadings, sediment

oxygen demand (SOD), stream flow, and dissolved oxygen concentration at

saturated conditions (a function of temperature) are fed to the computer

which projects oxygen deficits at points downstream.                 '?

     Most oxygen deficits in streams are attributable to biological activity
         L
which increases at warmer temperatures (summer conditions).  Conversely,

water's ability to retain oxygen decreases with increasing temperature i.e.

the DO saturation value decreases.  Also, streamflow declines in the late

summer months and incident sunlight increases water temperatures.  Thus at!
                                40

-------
a time when oxygen demands increase,  the  ability  of  the  water to meet




those demands diminishes.  For  this reason models are  usually run to




depict critical conditions which might normally occur  in the later summer




months.



     Data collected have shown  the following:  1.  The DO downstream from




Woodland Dam can drop to less than 5.0 mg/1  during warm  weather and low




flow conditions, 2.  Over the past five years  the average daily flow has




been less than 1000 cfs on seventy days,  3.  Sediment  oxygen demands in




the river reach between Woodland Dam  and  Milltown bridge average between




3.0 and 4.0 gm 02/m2/day and 4.  The  calculated oxygen uptake rate (k-rate)




necessary to satisfy the 5-day  BOD is 0.3 per  day.




     Using the foregoing information  and  the two  dimensional model developed




from the data collected in August 1972, the  model was  run on a matrix of




conditions while holding the river water  temperature constant at 25°C.   The




river flow was varied from 480  cfs to 1000 cfs, G-P's  waste  load from 5000 ppd




to 19,200 ppd BOD5, SOD from 1.0 - 5.0 gm 02/m2/day, initial DO between 5.0




and 6.0 mg/1, uptake rate (k-rate) between 0.2/day and 0.3/day.




     The matrix studied showed  that the DO will exceed the 5.0 mg/1 DO




minimum specified in the Maine  Water  Quality Standards if the mill dis-




charge is 5000 ppd BOD5.  If the BOD5 is  increased to  10,000 ppd, the SOD




must be less than 2.0 gm 02/m2/day and the k-rate less than  0.3 per day to




maintain a satisfactory DO level.  Based  upon  an  SOD of  2.0  gm 02/m2/day and




a k-rate of 0.3 per day, the calculated allowable BODs load  from the mill is




7,500 ppd.  This 8005 loading precludes the  introduction of  any new waste




sources to the St. Croix River  between Woodland and  Milltown.
                                 41

-------
     Increasing the river flow to 750 cfs, greatly improves the river's




assimilative capacity.  At an SOD of 2.0 gm 0 /m /day and a k-rate of




0.2/day, a calculated BOD  of 11,800 ppd will not violate water quality




standards.
                                42

-------
DISCUSSION


     Because of the high streamflow, a direct comparison of the August


1972 water quality data and past water quality data is not possible.  The


increased flow by diluting the waste concentrations, presents a biased


representation of improved water quality conditions.  The higher flows


also increase the potential for reaeration, lateral mixing, and cooling,


all of which will create more favorable oxygen balances in the stream.


Thus, comparison of past and present data will be limited to the data


least influenced by changing river conditions, namely the waste loadings.


     Loadings to the river are attributable to three sources:  the


Baileyville municipal wastes, Georgia-Pacific Corporation mill complex, and


log floating and storage.  The Baileyville wastes may be discounted because


they are negligible when compared to those from the mill.

                                                   2
     Preceding a water quality study in August 1970 , Georgia-Pacific


Coporation had installed a color removal and primary treatment system for


its process wastes, but these were not fully operational at the time of that


study.  With this in mind and the fact that the mill was operating on


reduced capacity during part of the August 1972 study, a comparison of


changes in effluent characteristics can proceed.


     In 1970 the average daily discharge from the defoaming lagoon was


34.75 million gallons of waste which contained 69,000 pounds of 8005.   In


1972 the respective values were 31.6 million gallons and 54,000 pounds  of


6005.  A twenty percent decrease was noted in total suspended matter which


declined from 25,400 pounds in 1970 to 20,000 pounds in 1972.  The color


of the effluent averaged 1350 platinum-cobalt units.  Although a very high


value, it appears to be an improvement.  This judgment is based on a
                                43

-------
 comparison of water quality data immediately downstream from the effluent


 (station SC2U) where dilution is minimized.  In 1970 the color at SC2U


 averaged 1264 color units and in 1972 890 units.  Other notable waste


 characteristics were a strong odor and increasing amounts of foam in the


 lagoon and river as the study progressed.  Both characteristics were also


 noted in the 1971 IJC report.


      Bioassays performed using the mill's effluent indicated severe toxicity.


 In semi-static tests all fish subjected to waters containing 17 percent


 effluent were dead in less than eighty-five hours and those in higher


 effluent concentrations died even sooner.  With the exception of the fish in


 the control tanks and one tank having a 25 percent effluent concentration,


 all fish subjected to continuous flow bioassays died in less than the 40


 hours.  Eighty percent of the fish in one 25 percent effluent tank and all


 the fish in the control tanks survived longer than the 96 hours specified


 for the tests.  The Canadian government has established toxicity standards


 for effluents from pulp and paper mills.  The Canadian standard stipulates


 that 100 percent of the test organisms must survive 96 hours in a test


 dilution containing 65 percent effluent.  The mill effluent did not approach


 compliance with this standard.


      Live caged fish placed in the river showed that the effluent is toxic


 four miles downstream and probably causes death by thermal shock immediately
                                                                      1   1

,downstream from the mill.  Histopathology showed that the toxicants damage
             •ti            '  '                 '                      '

 the olfactory (smell) organs in fish.  Both facts will prevent the re-


 establishment of a salmon fishery in the St. Croix River.


      Log floating and storage practices haye not changed appreciably since


 1970.   Georgia-Pacific Corporation through its subsidiary the St. Croix
                                 44

-------
Pulpvood Ltd. of Canada continues to float logs from the Canadian log


landing near Grand Falls Dam to Woodland Lake.  In so doing, G-P


perpetuates the deposition and leaching of oxygen demanding wastes in


Woodland Lake.  The 1972 study showed that the deposition of these waters


increased the sediment oxygen demand from approximately 2 gm C^/m /day  in


Grand Falls Flowage to more than 3 gm C^/m^/day in Woodland Lake.


Conversely, dissolved oxygen concentrations in Woodland Lake were 1.5 mg/1


less than those in the river at Kellyland.

                                                                     f\
     The 1972 data shows sediment ocygen demand exceeding 6.0 gm 02/m /day


approximately 1.25 miles downstream from the mill.  Farther downstream  at


Baring the average demand was more than 3.5 gm 02/nr/day.  Comparison of


nonfilterable residue values at Baring and Milltown bridge indicates that


little material is settling out.  Therefore, the demand is being exerted


primarily by historical sludge deposits and will exist for several years.


The SOD is not expected to decrease to less than 2.0 gm 02/m^/day, the


approximate value of SOD in upstream control areas.
                                45

-------
                       ST. CROIX RIVER STUDY
                           AUGUST 1972
                            BIBLIOGRAPHY

1.  U. S. Geological Survey.  "Current Water Resources in Maine."
    Water Resources Division, U. S. Geological Survey in cooperation
    with the Maine Public Utilities Commission (August 1972).

2.  Advisory Board on Pollution Control - St. Croix River.   St. Croix
    River.  Summary report submitted to the International Joint
    Commission.  Advisory Board on Pollution Control, March  1971.

3.  Coastal Research Corporation.  "Aerial Photography of Dye Dispersion
    and Characteristics of the St. Croix River".  An interpretation
    report prepared for the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency,
    Region I.  Lincoln, Mass.:  Coastal Research Corporation, September
    1972.

4.  Schaumburg, Frank D.  The Influence of Log Handling on Water Quality.
    Report for the Water Quality Office, Environmental Protection Agency.
    1972.

5.  Sproul, Otis J. and Clifford A. Sharpe.  Water Quality Degradation by
    Wood Bark Pollutants.  Water Resources Center Publication Number 5.
    Orono, Maine:  University of Maine, 1968.

6.  Coopersmith, S. (ed.).  Lockwood's Directory of the Paper and Allied
    Trades.  Ninety-sixth edition.  New York:  Lockwood Publishing
    Company, 1971.

7.  American Public Health Association, AWWA and WPCF.  Standard Methods
    for the Examination of Water and Wastewater.  Thirteenth edition.
    Washington:  American Public Health Association, 1971. pp. 539.

8.  Ellis, M. M.  Water Purity Standards for Fresh Water Fishes.  Special
    scientific report No. 25.  U. S. Department of the Interior, 1948.

9.  Johanson, A.  "The White-Fish Population of Lake Ocke".  Rep. Inst.
    Fresh-Water Res. Drottningholm 31, 1950.  Biology Abstract #26, 1952.

10. National Technical Advisory Committee to the Secretary of the Interior.
    Water Quality Criteria.  Washington:  Federal Water Pollution Control
    Administration, 1968.

11. Mackenthun, K. M. and L. E. Keup.  "Assuming Temperature Effects with
    Biology".  Proc. Am. Po. Conference, Vol. 31, 1969.

12. McKee, J. E. and H. W. Wolf (ed.).  Water Quality Criteria.  Second
    edition.  Sacramento:  State Water Quality Control Board, 1963. pp. 284.

13. Maine Environmental Improvement Commission.  Revised Statutes of 1964
    Title 38 (as ammended).  Chapter 3 September 23, 1971.
                                46

-------
APPENDIX  A

-------
                                       jrrovi s i oiiaj.  ana ruttc"'. ^ o rov'-^'.on




         01021000  SUMMARY F0 T
! ,710
1,410
1,32.1
I ,430
1,160
:i6?
773
__
-
303 	
31,527 ??.,
1,017
1,710
747
1Q71 T ITAL °
1972 T'JTAL rt
NOV
312
750
690
710
999
742
139
R6-4
736
733
77Q
7? I
9SO
730
*?3
5*1
615
5-30
7J4
7?M.
5V>
4 -T>
5?. 0
5-13
673
o IS
994
9^.0
^1 0
•5 / C
"7 •» ^
-.75
74Q
•; ->•)
405
•r»->,on
3°, 33'
DEC
1,340
1,330
1,390
1,360
1,500
1 ,230
1,250
937
\ ,550
1,630
l,0«iO
095
r 43
63"
<,73
741
7° 3
771.
7b3
7S?
76C
774
725
737
012
! ,050
1.3 5
T 1 i
1 , 07 C
1 rt /» n
i » y**ij
1 ,040
31,446
1 ,014
1 , ^ '. C
07 ft
} '-1EAN
, Mr AN
JAN
1,070
1 ,450
1,330
1 ,040
1,030
1,030
1,030
997
1 ,010
1,140
1 ,270
1,150
1 ,3?0
1,3.30
1,090
1,?70
1,540
1,670
1,620
1 , 59J
1,5?.)
1 , bOO
1,620
1 ,660
1 ,540
I ,710
1 , n 1 0
1 ,"3)0
1,4?0
1 = A "\
i ? ?H J
1-» / . »
, 760
1 ,'37
1 , « 1 0
007
2,3^7
2,293
FEB
1,740
1,710
1,53C
1 , 2 90
1,130
1,120
1,140
1,270
\ ,540
1,110
904
923
9'.?
893
792
924
q 1 1
39?
39C
90-t
*7'3
346
•323
952
7 iU
3-56
366
T I 2
757


30, 164
1,040
1,740
757
MAX 11,300
MAX 12, 103
MAR
726
1,010
1,040
1,210
1 ,260
1.17C
1,200
1 ,430
I ,440
1 ,510
1 ,560
1,550
1,540
1,770
2,010
1,940
1 , 'i 6 C
? ,510
2,360
2,300
?,30Q
2,9*0
3,730
4,130
3,070
?,620
?,°70
? , °4Q
? ,340
"^ £5 Lf. C\
7 ' %n
•36 , 1 66
2,134
4,130
726
MIN
MIN
APR
2,850
2, "60
2,390
2,380
2,920
2,920
2,860
2,HOO
2,790
2,430
2,100
2 , 340
2,460
2,590
2,t9C
?,520
2,^90
2,050
3 , 1^0
3, 100
3,030
3,090
3,150
3,190
3,550
3, "60
4,130
5, nc
5,d50
"? Q JP
t , " ' \*
97,130
? , .2 3 B
' 5,990
2,100
495
495
MAY
7,210
3,340
3,890
10,200
11,300
12,100
11,300
10,500
9,830
8,360
7,310
6,650
5,560
5,270
4,820
5,b'00
5,960
5,760
5,060
4,300
4,350
4,310
4,120
3,610
2,360
3,020
3,060
3,020
2,620
y .", sn
£. , J J\J
2 A ^ n
, O 3 U
191,490
6,177
12,100
2,550


JUN
2,840
4,130
4,500
5,06C
4,810
4,290
3,510
3.47C
3,380
4,100
4,520
4,860
5,550
4,380
3,830
3,900
3.97C
3,880
3,640
3,280
2,900
2,360
2,920
3,050
5,130
6,210
6,100
5,89C
5.37C
4 . 4 3D
^ , •* j \j
127, 26C
4,242
6,210
2,340


JUL
3,640
3,440
2,830
1,440
1,280
1,960
2,510
2,360
2,390
2,320
2,430
2,650
2,630
2,460
2,480
2,530
2,150
2,100
1,950
1,910
1,570
1,320
1,320
1,380
1,890
1,610
1,570
1,750
1,970
7 .450
C, t ^ J w
2 A O f\
f " * \J
66,330
2,156
3,640
1,280


AUG
2,470
2,040
1,700
2,290
2,580
2,470
2,460
2,500
2,410
2,400
2,370
2,360
2.37C
2,360
2,460
2,490
2,410
2,490
2,370
2,330
2,390
2,300
2,350
2,420
2,330
2,190
2,040
2,170
2,260
2 .250
b f b J \f
21 * n
f 1 J U
72,180
2,328
2,580
1 ,700


SEP
2,090
2,090
2,100
2,040
1,760
2,390
2,340
2,410
2,550
2,300
2,510
2,520
2,470
2,230
2,000
2,080
2,110
2,110
2,080
1,790
1,560
1,530
1,780
1 ,870
1,690
1,460
1,390
1,680
1,380
i . ^nn
JL , J OU
59,690
1,990
2,550
1,380


Note.—Not  for publication.

-------
to
               DAY
01021003  SUMMARY FOR JAN*- SEPT 1971    TOTAL:    771162.00,  MAX:    11300.00,  MIN:       721.00




        UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR - GEOLOGICAL SURVEY - WATER RESOURCES DIVISION




               ST. CROIX RIVER AT BARING, MAINE                     NUMBER 01021000




          DISCHARGE, IN CUBIC FEET PER SECOND, WATER YEAR OCTOBER 1970 TO SEPTEMBER 1971




   OCT      NOV      OEC      JAN      FEB      MAR      APR      MAY      JUN      JUL      AUG
SEP
1
2
3
4
5
6
T
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
1 1
»1
TOTAL
MEAN
WX
MIN
CAL YR
WTR YR
1,890 2.990
1.570 2,980
l,7434 2,933
1,870 2,900
1,940 2,470
2.06J 2,360
2,050 1,910
2,040 2,533
1,360 2,180
2,010 1,71)
1,860 2,100
1,653 2,030
1,450 1,970
1,320 2,050
1,200 1,950
1,560 2,02J
1,780 1,850
1,770 2.13Q
1,710 2,^73
1,280 2,360
2,263 2,600
2,470 2,35)
2,270 2,360
2,553 2,763
3,270 2,810
3,090 2,68)
2,910 2,700
2,860 2,640
3,050 ?,600
2,820 2,520
2n r\ r\
64,650 71,810
2,085 2,394
3,270 2,990
1,200 1,710
2,550
2,640
2,520
2,650
2,650
2,520
?,310
2,590
2,500
2,430
2,410
2,490
2,300
2,330
2,560
2,300
1 ,760
1,710
1,533
1,660
1,960
2,650
1,470
632
763
1,1-70
2,133
1,310
1,670
1,620
If i f\
tilJ
64,145
2 , 069
?,650
682
1970 THTAL 1,122,425 MFAN
1971 TOTAL 971,767 MFAN
1,560
1,450
1,800
1,860
1,850
1,900
2,210
2,390
2,400
1,960
1,830
2,063
1,920
1,920
1,340
1,850
1,810
1,810
2,323
2,110
2,15)
1,780
1,670
1,880
1,730
1,750
1,460
1,930
1.690
1,790
If on
, 790
58,020
1,872
2,400
1,340
3,075
2,662
1,790
2,010
1,870
1,740
2,000
1,990
1,590
1,860
1,940
2,140
2,270
2, 200
2,230
2,930
3,220
3,060
3,140
3,110
3,200
3,320
3,220
3,150
3,160
3,140
3,080
3,030
3,010
3,010




72,500
2,589
3 , 320
1,590
MAX 13,
MAX 11,
2,270
2,220
2,180
2,180
2,210
2,160
2,170
2,220
2,030
2,190
2,030
2,140
..',190
2,070
,, 2,220
2,290
2,380
2,390
2,370
2,393
2,353
2,310
2,290
2,280
2,270
2,270
2,150
2,390
2,270
2,280
2-> c/\
, £.J(J
69,410
2,239
2,390
2,030
000 MIN
300 MIN
2,350
2,530
2,830
3,150
3,950
5,600
6,000
5,950
5,850
5,650
5,600
5,600
5,800
6,800
7,700
7,650
7,450
7,150
7,0)0
7,300
3,380
8,860
9,000
8,820
(1,710
3,580
3,340
8,080
7,760
7,540
195,980
6,533
9,000
2,350
682
682
7,460
7,440
7,570
8,040
9.B90
11,000
11,300
10,800
10,200
9,120
3,540
7,000
5,380
4,970
5,220
5,230
5,050
4,020
3,093
2,810
2,843
2,760
2,840
2,900
2,810
2,740
2,980
2,740
2 , 690
2,820
•% n\f\
It'JUl
175,260
5,654
11,300
2,690


2,910
2,820
2,550
2,010
' 2,920
2,740
2,503
2,500
2,320
2,620
2,740
2,540
2,490
2,510
2,550
2,530
2,450
2,320
2,62)
2,670
2,413
2,410
2,413
2,290
2,590
2,740
2,380
2,230
2,300
2.480
75,550
2,518
2,920
2.010


2,720
2,450
2,490
2,460
1,490
1,510
2,360
2,230
2,300
2,520
2,560
2,180
1,890
1,890
1,680
1,630
2,150
1,970
1,450
1,920
1,700
1,920
2,070
2,030
1,980
1,980
2,100
2,290
2,170
1,660
I^c -\
• 33 J
63,100
2,035
2,720
1,353


1,300
1,310
1,190
1.100
868
934
1,060
982
982
982
950
974
1,080
1,060
1,060
1,040
1,010
1,030
1,120
987
976
1,120
1,060
1,090
1,030
1,070
1,040
1,120
1,180
1,020
Q **A
" OD
32,741
1,0,56
1,310
868


1,070
983
990
968
951
897
768
816
980
987
923
919
900
737
979
395
816
664
1 , 020
998
957
825
721
780
1,070
1,290
1,280
1.180
1.040
992
28,601
953
1.290
721


Note. — Not for publication.

-------
                UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT UF INTERIOR - GEOLOGICAL SURVEY - WATER RESOURCES DIVISION

   ST. CROIX  RIVER  AT BARING,  MAINE
                                                                                DRAINAGE AREA
DAY
                                                                                        NO.  01021000
                                                                                        1370.000 SC MI
                  DISCHARGE,  IN CUBIC FEET PER SECOND, HATER YEAR OCTQtiEk 19o9 TO SEPTEMBER 1970
OCT
NOV
DEC
JAN
FEB
MAR
                                              APR
                                                                           MAY
                                                                         JUN
1 2,120
2 2,630
3 2,350
4 2,620
5 2,330
6 * 2,110
7 2,260
3 2,400
9 2,560
10 2,480
11 2,510
12 2,430
13 2,090
14 2,390
15 2,400
16 2,440
17 2,180
18 2,510
19 2.3P.O
20 ' 2,250
21 2,340
22 2,510
23 2*130
24 2,520
25 2,500
26 2,500
27 2,480
28 2,400
29 1,910
30 1.970
1,920
1,910
1,900
2,090
2,490
3,990
5,040
5,160
4,690
4,710
4,090
3,540
3,810
3,220
3,J20
3,370
3,250
3,160
2,660
2,730
2,560
2,790
2,690
2,650
2,c30
2,290
2*490
1,910
1,900
l',900
31 1,960
TOTAL 72,660 90,*>eO
MEAN 2,344
MAX 2,630
MIN 1,910
CAL YR 1969 TOTAL
WTR YR 1970 TOTAL
3*019
5,160
1,900
987,
1*210,
1,790
1,870
1,640
1,870
1,950
1,960
1, 9tO
1,650
1,910
2,730
3,770
6,270
6,240
5,?. 1C
4,100
4,o90
3,750
2,430
2»ri90
2,690
2,970
-,140
•;. ,310
3 , 2^0
4,1<50
4 , 1 f. C
H , 890
3 »C6o
9.39C
8.3PC
7^ n f\
,uOC
125,740
4,C5fc
9,390
I,t40
5,800
4,700
4,000
3,500
?,OOC
2,700
i,6!iO
2,660
2,77C
2,750
2,550
2 *4"iO
2,540
209C
2,710
2,170
t- ,860
2 ,340
2 »*?0
2,390
< ,470
i. i.}<50
'e. , 5 '> 0
2 » 3 4 C
?,200
2,A1C
2,310
2,110
2,230
2,2*0
1-5,760
2 ,766
5,300
2,110
246 MEAN 2,705
HOO "-I
•AN 3,317
2,560
2,360
3,320
9,900
13,000
11,000
1-1,400
7,400
7,030
5,500
4, 100
5,700
7,600
7,600
7,400
6,500
5,400
3,50J
2,460
2,520
2,600
2 t 54 J
2,070
3, 160
2,540
2,500
2,740
2,740




144,910
5,175
13,000
2, Jf'J
MAX 10
MAX 13
2,740
2,410
2,890
2,890
2,490
2,8oO
2,460
2,4?0
2,"r?0
2,970
2,7*0
2,7?0
2,810
?. iZ'jQ
2,9bO
2,900
2,9->0
2 , 9 c C
2,3>-C
2,710
2,9r-0
2 , r>c 0
2,?/C
2,<-0
2, 5 JO
2,440
3,450
4 , 1 2 0
7,100
•',700
;->, 0*1 1
6, ^t»u
'. , o 8 0
••t MC
1«»3,240
4,773
f , ?OC
^,900
.ess
1,100
5,010
4,450
5,030
5,070
5,610
6,070
6,010
6,30')
• 5 , 840
to,,:>frO
3,4; ;i
3,410
0,720
l) , 4 4 (j
lO.A.OO
lo'.Pf'O
10,200
10,1 00
•1,970
7,6<«0
6,190
4',3(.0
'i , 0 7 0
i t Q • : o
3/\ r r.
, • J .' L
19/.220
'i, 201
10,600
2,^0u


3,130
3, 330
3,150
2.S2.0
2,340
2, '.-40
2,710
? , ? h 0
2, MO
2,420
.2,*bC
2, -55';
7,060
6,050
4,'ilO
2.S6C
1, HO
2,^50
? • 250
2,130
2,:»/«w
? , 1 0 "
1,68C
1 , T ? i-1
i , 750
1,(.?C
1.67C
l,7dC
1,730
i,7bC
7d,S70
2,63/>
7,060
1,630


1,740
1,740
1,740
1,290
1,100
1,770
1,690
1,700
1,690
1,680
1,7'jrO
1 , 7G()
2.C40
2, 6VO
2,820
2,?CO
1 ,7 '-10
2, I TO
2,150
?,1«0
1,910
l,7ftO
1,7MO
1,7?0
1,620
l^^O
1,600
1,620
1,600
1,600
1 '\ 7 rt
1 t ^ i U
5f,,070
1,809
^,820
1,100


1,430
1,270
1,720
1,850
1,840
1,670
1,870
1,870
1,850
1,590
1,H30
1,820
1,790
1,830
1,740
1,«30
1,760
1,650
1,P50
1,860
1 , 89-:
1 , 93'1
2,370
1,290
1,290
1,620
1,S50
2 , r> 3 0
2,410
2,2bO
56,300
1,816
2,530
1,270


2,530
2, 6>60
2,660
2,610
2,510
2,620
4,4->U
5,210
3,400
3.72C
3,110
2 , ? 6 0
2,3?0
1 »TJ')
2,210
2.51C
2,0^0
2,170
?,210
2.3SO
2,290
2,350
1,410
1,780
2,360
2,060
2.U60
1,950
1 , ? 0 0
1,74^,
75,6^0
2,522
5,210
1,410



-------
               UNITED  STATES  DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR - GEOLOGICAL SURVEY - fcATER RESOURCES CIVISICH

   ST. CROIX RIVER AT  8ARING,  MAINE
DAY
OCT
                                                               DRAINAGE  AREA

DISCHARGE, IN CUBIC FEET PER SECOND, WATER YEAR OCTOBER  1968  TO  SEPTEMBER  1969

 *  NOV      DEC      JAN      FEB      MR      APR      MAY       JUN      JUL
                                                                                      NO.  1-C210.00
                                                                                        1390.000 SQ MI
                                                                                                      ALG
                                                                                                    SEP
I 1> 1 30
2 1,110
3 1,100
4 1,CRO
5 l.icr
6 93?
7 1,140
8 1 ,000
9 832
10 787
11 863
12 1,100
13 851
14 1,030
15 962
16 738
17 660
iq 791
19 1,220
2* 1,200
21 1,2^
2? 1,150
?3 1,OK
24 l.nic
25 936
26 1,030
27 989
?8 9C5
29 <*82
30 l,*Cr
887
887
937
732
8C8
995
617
1,0?0
•343
855
780
422
974
2.17C
I, 950
2,050
1,77"
1 ,640
2,120
2.C90
2,050
1,80-0
1 ,960
1,97"
2,"> 30
1.65C
I ,990
1,760
1,«4*
I ,720
31 844 	 —
TOTAL 3°,5P3 43,807
MEAN 98:7
"AX 1,300
MIN 660
CAL YP 1968 TOTAL
WTR YP 1969 TOTAL
1 ,460
2,170
617
898,440
861,016
1,660
1,490
1,290
1,320
2,?40
2,630
2,900
3,24?
2,980
2,680
2,460
1,823
?,roo
2,130
3,150
5, ISO
6,410
4,920
4,320
3,560
3,030
2,960
2,<»60
2,440
2,500
2,770
2,690
2,B7C
2,8K
2,640
23 1 *\
, 31"
•38,360
2,850
6,410
1,290


2,460
2,58C
2,48C
2,200
2,360
2,470
2,650
2,680
2,3^0
2,440
2,630
2,630
2,480
2,470
2,520
2,3^0
2,410
1,840
1,920
1,870
1,850
1,540
1,790
1,740
1,940
1 ,55C
1,740
2,040
1,780
1,570
14. Q f*
,oH'
67,00^
2,161
2,6S"
1, 540
MFAN 2,45)5
MEAN 2,359
1,790
1,880
1,660
1.B1*
1,920
1,780
1,67C
1,660
1,720
1,660
1,990
2,160
1,820
1 ,960
1,980
1,9K
1,930
1,990
2,010
1.93C
2,C^r
?, 120
1,890
1,90"
1,930
2,12C
1,930
2.C30




53, 190
1 , 90f,
2,160
1,660
MAX 3,
MAX 10,
1,740
1 ,950
1,890
2,090
2.C30
1,850
1 ,980
1,990
2 ,040
2, 11C
1,790
1 ,9b<^
2,010
1 ,83C
i.aac
1 ,890
2 H080
2,13C
1 ,330
2,0«0
1 ,850
2,060
1 ,72T
2,110
2,200
2 ,690
3,120
3,190
3,430
4,27C
A rt 1 r,
t 1 ' 1U
69,820
2,2!>2
4,270
1,720
170 MIN
50C MIN
3,61C
4,370
3,540
3,920
3,830
3.81C
3,770
3,73C
3,380
4,300
3,310
6,250
6,410
6,h30
7.C9C
7.8SO
3,25C
9,5^0
ir.brc
?,83C
8,080
6,9ir
7,180
8,4 1C
8,74C
8,e>ao
7,53C
6 , 30C
5,730
4,860
188,200
6,273
lessor
3.38C
617
617
4,C9C
3i730
3,52C
3,180
3,150
3,100
2 ,970
2,830
2,760
2,69C
2,U6C
1 ,76C
2,550
?,74C
2,580
2,070
2.23C
1,72C
1,92C
2,r«jO
2,360
•2,160
2,270
2,170
2,28C
2,080
1,930
2,070
1 ,80C
1,820
ID drt
, O S'J
77,300
2,494
4,090
1,720


1.99C
1,930
1,54C
1,810
1,650
U61C
1 , 330
1.73C
1,25C
1,650
1,730
1,640
1,48C
1,690
1,630
1, 5ir
1 ,460
1,62C
1,6K
l,4bG
1,400
1,340
1,530
1,570
1.61C
1,640
1,48C
1,750
1,760
1,510
47,910
1,597
'1,990
1,25C


1,43C
1,860
1,250
698
778
1.45C
1,420
1,44C
1,62C
1,510
i.cer.
1.25C
1,410
2,210
2,36C
1,940
1,970
l,9«C
1,93<:
1,270
1,26C
1 ,2 30
1,310
1,5CO
1,47C
l,TtC
1,9EC
2,010
1,830
l.SCO
1 Q £O
It" Cw
49,086
1,5£3
2.36C
6S8


1,780
1.92C
2,030
2.14C
2,7dC
2.81C
2,7EC
2,420
1.64C
2,07C
1,9£C
2,040
1,780
1,87C
2,120
2, QIC
2,090
l.SCC
1,9«C
1,870
1.9AC
2,05C
1.92C
2,C£C
1,85C
1.7SC
1,970
2,34C
1.8CO
1,960
5 5 "r
£ 1 £. i\j
65,OSC
2, ICC
2, 8 1C
1,78C


1.46C
1,360
2,170
2,230
1,970
l.SSC
2,230
2,090
2,3CO
4, 64C
5.76C
5,030
4,550
3,46C
2, 360
2,4CC
2,460
2,370
2,520
2,560
2.61C
2,460
2,520
2,760
2,480
2.C6C
2,420
2,580
2,360
2,480
80,670
2,689
5,780
1,360


Not for publication

-------
Ul
               ST.  CROIX RIVER AT BARING, MAINF
           DAY
                                                                                           DRAINAGE AREA
                                                                                      NO.   1-0213.DC
                                                                                        1390.000 SU HI
                                      DISCHARGE, IN CFS, HATER YEAR OCTOBER 1967 TO SEPTEMBER 1968
OCT
NOV
DEC
                                                  JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
                                                                MAY
JUN
                                                                         JUL
AUG
SEP
1
2
3
4
5
6 _
7
fc
e
9
1C
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
I
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
TOTAL
MFAN
MAX
MIN
CAL YR
rfTR YR
4,950
5,330
4,220
3,820
3,380
3,220
2,320
2,320
2,050
i,*r?
1,91C
2,180
1,940
2,090
1,620
1,86?
1,60C
U56C
1,650 '
1,210

It290
1,330
1,250
1,060
1,3"0
1 ,480
1,410
1,6"0
1,550
1,510
1,530
1,410
1,380
1,420
1,540
1,810
2,140
1,730
1,490
1,340
1,380
1,410
1,220
1,290
1,33?
1,010
1,?20
1,250
1,330
1,370
1,390

1,230
1,260
1,441
2,750
2,431
2,730
2.5BO
2,680
2,630
2,840


66,240 51,130 K
2,137
5,330
1,160
1967: TOTAL
1968: TOTAL
1,704
2,840
i,no
819,616
959,240
2,410
2,330
1,850
2,520
3,?30
2.P40
2,691
2,B3?
2,61?
2,fl"0
2,420
3,o?o
3,95i
3»fl9i
5,030
6,17?
5,86?
5,190
4,840
A t ^00

4,283
4,1??
3,750
2,760
2,7^0
3,190
? , 5??
2,9*0
2,800
2 ,4*. 3
2,210
5,130
3,393
hi I 7"
1.W50


2,300
2,280
2,710
2,710
2,780
2,94?
3,070
2,130
2,82?
2,980
2.75C
2,740
2 ,65"
3,000
2.82C
2.H20
2,750
3,120
3,040
_ -3 , 1 7?

2,89?
3,-?6?
3,030
?,15?
3,05?
2,990
3 »Cf?O
2,940
2,5*0
3,?0i
2,97?
8'8,30C 1
2,848
3,17?
2,130
MFAN ?,246
MEAN 2,618
3,010
2,840
4,30?
6,180
5,8*o
5,610
5,330
4, 950
4 , ?1O
4, IK
4, "5"
3,530
2 , 711
3,09"
2, 98?
2,890
2,99"
3,110
',780
2
151 M
170 M
5,750
6,20?
5,77?
^ • tt *^ ft
A Q IK ft
5,430
5,160
5,0gi
5 , 1 1?
4,771
5,260
5,^7"
5,?*"
5,330
5,23?
5,970
7,'*2"
3,17i
7,6?i
6,29i

5,760
S,(S7i
5,RK
5,28"
5,*60
7,4H
^,fr?i
6,4B1
5,490
4,240


173, B90
5,706
3,171
4,240
IN 788
IN 743
3,490
3,000
2,690
2,950
2,670
2,94?
2,930
2,891
2,770
2,750
• 2,680
2,20r
2,490
2,350
2,56?
2,59?
2,49?
2,69?
2,760
2,89")

3 j'1?1*
3,12?
?,39C
2,77?
?,65?
2,640
',641
?, 1 11
2,440
2,631
2,45^
84,270
2,718
3,491
2,111


2,fc«n
2,71?
2,710
2,580
2,53?
2,53?
2,5Rf
2»M ?
?,6K
?,540
2,510
2,370
2 ,?60
2,?40
1,97?
1,910
1 ,36?
1,90C
1,73"
1,740

1,93!"
?» 25r
?, IP?
1,37"
ItTir
2, "40
l,9?0
1,790
2 , ifer
1,99?


66,12"
2,2?4
2,71"
l,7K


2,070
1,890
2,033
1,120
1,630
2,160
2,060
1,560
1,490
1,490
1,450
1,300
1,480
1,660
1,453
1,350
1,333
1.26C
1,240
1,233

1,250
1,220
1,320
1,240
1,640
1,500
1,240
1.3CO
1,210
1,210
1,193
45,570
1,470
2.160
1,120


1,460
1,503
1,630
1,620
1,500
1,680
1,360
1,363
1,610
1,613
1,450
1,320
1,413
1,370
l,2bO
1,270
1,290
1,280
1,323
1,343

1.3U3
1,483
913
1,010
1,083
96C
1,353
1,110
974
1,11C
935
43,659
1*312
1,683
913


1,170
818
743
1,120
919
1.1CC
I.C6C
1,C80
1,130
1,120
915
1.1CO
1,060
1,250
1,260
i.cec
1, 11C
1,190
1, 160
1,180

1,210
1.C9C
1.C90
1,C5C
I, CSC
1.04C
1,110
I.C9C
1.C50
996


32,361
1.C79
1,260
743



-------
APPENDIX  B

-------
                          ST. CROIX RIVER
                            AUGUST 1972

                        TIME OF TRAVEL STUDY

                     WOODLAND TO MILLTOWN, MAINE


     On August 5, 1972 EPA Region I personnel and Coastal Research

Coporation, Lincoln, Massachusetts, conducted a time of travel study

on the St. Croix River.  The study area was from the Georgia-Pacific

Coporation mill in Woodland, Maine to the International Bridge at

Milltown, Maine-New Brunswick.  Using fluorometric techniques, EPA

personnel measured dye concentrations at the railroad bridge in Baring,

Maine and Milltown Bridge.  In conjunction with this, Coastal Research

Coporation, Lincoln, Massachusetts, traced the dye path using multispectral

aerial photographic techniques.

     During the study river flows as measured at the Baring gage ranged

from 2480 cubic feet per second (cfs) to 2700 cfs (See Table B-l).  These

flows are approximately 43% higher than the flows encountered during the

1970 study, and 52% higher than the monthly mean August flow based on

five years of record including 1972, and 5.4 times higher than the

established l-in-10-year, 7-day low flow of 480 cfs.

     Also during this time, the dam at Woodland, Maine was being repaired.

The construction activities created a continual sediment discharge into

the Canadian side of the St. Croix River which could be traced many miles

downstream.

     At 0740, hours, the EPA crew injected a ten gallon slug of Rhodamine

B dye 20 feet downstream fro the defoaming lagoon outfall at Georgia-


      Coastal Research Corporation, "Interpretation Report - Aerial
Photography of Dye Dispersion and Characteristics of the St. Croix
River, Lincoln, Mass.:  Coastal Research Corp., 1972 (Xeroxed).


                               B-l

-------
                TABLE  B-l

          ST. CROIX RIVER STUDY
              AUGUST 1972

BI-HOURLY FLOWS AT BARING DURING DYE STUDY
    Time
   (Hours)
    0600

    '0800

    1000

    1200

    1400

    1600

    1800

    2000

    2200
Flow
(cfs)

2470

2480

2480

2620

2700

2700

2700

2690

2700
                  B-2

-------
Pacific Corporation.  Approximately 1.25 hours later, aerial




reconnaissance showed that the leading edge and major concentration




of dye was at Bailey Rips.  Approximately 4.5 hours after the dye was




introduced, the peak concentration passed the railroad bridge at Baring,




Maine.  Aerial photographs showed that at 1400 hours, the leading edge




was leaving Baring Basin.  At 1720 hours, the leading edge arrived at




Milltown Bridge.  The peak arrived at Milltown at 1840 hours.  Figures B-l




and B-2 are representations of the dye patterns.




     The dye and sediment confirmed previous assumptions that the St. Croix




River from Woodland to Baring could be considered three distinct and




separate streams for modeling purposes.  Aerial photographs showed that




the dye hugged the U. S. bank and sediment lay along the Canadian bank




while midstream was relatively unaffected.  These conditions persisted




until Baring Rapids.  At the Baring railroad bridge, the dye was mixing




across the entire river.  Following the rips at Baring, visual observations




indicated rapid lateral mixing.  By the time the dye passed Milltown Bridge,




lateral diffusion was nearly uniform.
                               B-3

-------
   2.5
  2.0 -
OB
O.
O.
ON

CONCENTRAT



b
0

bi


*
  0.0
TJ
o
c
a
m
                                                          a

                                                          O

                                                          A
                                             i

                                             6
                                                               8
                                   TIME IN HOURS
SC4U  UNITED STATES



SC4C  CANADA



SCO 4  MIDSTREAM
                            TIME OF TRAVEL  STUDY

                 GEORGIA-PACIFIC CORP. TO BARING (TRANSECT SC04)

                     DYE CONCENTRATION VS.  ELAPSED TIME
      10

-------
      0.75
      0.60-
    00
    0.
    Q.
    Z 0.45-
    O
    H
    

         0  V
3
5
c
a
m
                                       0
                                       o
                    -  SC5U  UNITED STATES


                   —  SC5C  CANADA

                   —  SCO 5  MIDSTREAM
         10
12
i
13
14
                                         TIME IN HOURS
            TIME OF TRAVEL STUDY
GEORGIA-PACIFIC CORP.  TO MILLTOWN (TRANSECT SC05)
     DYE  CONCENTRATION  VS. ELAPSED TIME
15
fO

-------
APPENDIX  C

-------
NOTE:




       "J" denotes approximate value




       "K" actual value known to be less than value shown




       "L" actual value known to be more than value shown
                    01

-------
                                           \
                                                          SCKU
                                                          s 1(3 00.0 067 2* 25.0
                                                                  ?3 MA IHE
                                                                  NOKTHtAST
                                                                  SI CVUIX
                                                                  llllrft-.il
                                                                  2
                                                                              2111204
                                                                             0999 FEET   DEPTH
                                                                                     i
      PTVF&
      SYSTEM
      0119001
       TI
              III
                             IV
         VI
VII  VIII
IA
XI
               All
                                   FROM DAM AT KFLLYLANf), MAINE NEArt USGS GAGE.
                      0 U 0 1 0
OATF

 TO
7VOP/09
7?/0«/H
7?/01/l4
 OF
DAY  FFFT
                      CtNT
11 ?S 000?
11 IS ooni
10 AS 0001
11 OS 0001
11 IS 0001
11 40 0001
??.o
21 .S
?0.0
.?0.0
r-0.0
20.0
V|070
ru^H
JKSN
• TU
OOOHO
COLOrt
PT-ro
UNITS
00299
UU
PKO^F
M(i/L
• 00310
HUO
S DAY
MVi/L
         10 is ooo?
               19.0
0.7
0.7
O.f
0.9
1.0
0.9

1.0
50
4S
4S
5')
4b
45
50
6.2
7.2
-8.4
8.2
8.2
8.3
8.4
                                                                00400
                                                                 su
                                                J1501
                                              TOT COL I
                                              MF1MENDO
                                               /100ML
1 • 2K
1.2K
1.2K
l.?K
1 «'5?K
l.?K
6.«o
6.50
6. HO
6.30
6.30
6.60


2500
1600
2200
1600
l.i
                                                                          6.40
                                                                             1200
                           31616
                             COL I
                         Mf-M-FCBR
                          /100ML
                                                                                          2
                                                                                          2K
                                                                                          2K
                                                                                          6
                       OublS
  OftTF

   TO
     orpTH
 OF
OAY  FFFT  f Mli/L

1 I ?S 000?
11 IS OOOl       ?1
10 4S O0')l       /?7
11 OS 0001       ?9
11 IS OOOl       ?)
II 46 OOOl       10
10 ^S 000?       39
                             FIX FLT
                               Md/L
                                  00-^30
                                KtSl'lUK
                                TOT uFLT
                                  MG/L
                                                U
                                     11
OOS40
KtSloUK
FIX ,MFLT
*tt/L
U
0.4
1
3
0.4
1
1
OUS45
KF.S1MUE
SET1LMLE
ML/L







0 1027
CwUMlUM
CU»TOT
UG/L




*


                                                01042     01067     01092     01050
                                              COPPE*     NICKFL   ZINC      LEAD
                                              CUtTOT    NI.TOTAL  ZN»TOT    PB»SUSP
                                                UG/L      UG/L      UG/L      UG/L

-------
            PfY/FP
            SYSTFM
            0119001
       II
                                                                          scni
                                                                         4b  10  02.0 067 2<* 18.0
                                                                         23 MA I IMF.
                                                                         NOHTrltttST
                                                                         ST CKUIX
                                                                         llllHtbl
                                                                         2
                        ITI
VII  VIII
IX
XI
                                                                                2111204
                                                                               0999 FEET
                                                                                                   DEPTH
XII
                                                            DESCRIPTION
       OATF
       pu>OM
        TO
OI
                                      H* 1 1 Kit  AT "tfOoDLAND JUNCTION* MAINE.

                                      PIVtH SURVEY.
 OF
HOY
          10  AO  000?
7?/0«/09  10  '*5  000?
          1*  1(0  'Hi'I?
7?/OV10  10* li  "00?
          14  ?5  000?
          10  ?0  000?
          1<*  50  000?
          10  ?5  0{lO?
          i&  <;o  ooo?
7?/Ofl/n  10  15  000?
         '11  00  000?
          10  oo'oi)o?
          lu  IS  TOO?
                              ?0.0
                              ?o.n
                             .^0.0
                           0.6
                           0.6

                           0.6

                           0.9

                           1.1

                           0.6
                           0.7
45


45

45

50

45
45
5
5.1
6.8
6.7
7.0
6.9
7.4
7.5
6.8
6.6
6.4


                                                                         1.2K
                                                                         1.2K
                                                                         1.2K
                                                                         1.2K
                                                                         1.2K
00400
Pn

SU
6.70
6.30
6.30
6.60
6.60
6.bO
6.UO
6.60
0.80
6.bO
6. HO

31501
TOT COL I
MFIMENIV)
/100ML
420


1400

440

900

2500
750
1400
31616
FEC COLI
MFM-FCBR
/100ML
10K


H

2K

2K

2K
2K
2K
                                                             6.6
                                                                   6.90
00515
rtHTf TI'-'F O^Pf1-1 wFSlfnJF (•
F^H''
Tn
7?/0«/OP
73/00/09
7?/0«/10
73/oq/H
7?/0«/l?
7?/0«/ll
7?/OB/l4
OF
OAY
10
to
10
10
10
10
11
nos?5
^•^IOUF. «VK
00=130 OOStO 00545 010?7
SIOUF. KFSli)UE rtESiOUt: CAOMIUM
OTSS-105 FTX FLT TOT "IFLT FIX NFLT SETILBLE CU«TOT
F
40
'45
05
?0
'5
•^5
00
•e-FT C
ooo?
000?
000?
OOP?
ooo?
ooo?
000?
MCi/L
36J
!'•»
41
30
52
41
20
MG/L
11J
S
39
26
30
y
1«
MCi/L
U
H
1
3
1
0.4
1
MG/L


U

0

0
ML/L UG/L
U
0
.2
3
.5
0
.1
01042 01067 01092 01050
COHPtrt NICKFL ZINC LEAD
CU»TOT NItTOTAL ZN»TOT PBtSUSP
UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L








-------
                 7J/OH/1'-)
                                                              HS 09 2b.O  067 23 bo.O

                                                              2.'J MAINE
                                                              NtVTHfcAST
                                                              ST CHOIX
                                                              D
                                                              2
                                                                          2111204
                                                                        0999  FEET  DEPTH
SYST'"'
nil
II
ill
VIM
U
XI
                  h(){) FT IVSrwKAM FKOM THf HF.F04M1NK LAGOON OUTFALL  AT  GEORGIA-PACIFIC

                  COHH.. b  FT  fKU.-l U.S.a. BANK NtAH DU^NSIHEAM tDoE  OF  "GUNME11 SLOPE
                                •Y,
                  PHOTFCTIO,!  f-OK DFFUAMIMR LAGoONt  -WOODLANO* M

                  LMfiOO'-J« U.S.A. HA.vin. •» ng
7?/op/nq 10
7?/0«»/10 10
79/OH/l? 11
7?/oR/i3 in
75>/r»p/i<, fm



FFFT
43
?l
?S
40
10
00
30
SO

F


A3
'1
?S
in
no
30

noo
nno
000
000
000

1
1
1
1
1
00010
••JATF-y
Tc.MP
CtHT
20. S
21. S
21.^
21.0
21. S
20. S
0001 .b S-)
l.rt So
.1.2 <»••>
2.0 S'l
l.r> 4S
0.9 30
2.1 SO
4*
^0^2S OOS30
iVP^lOUK ^hSMUF
HX FLT TOT "iFLT
MG/L Mii/L
1 11
:* 3
52 S
00299
UO
Pr«0»nf
MG/L
7.
7.
ft.
6.




(10540
PF.iiluUt
FIX NFL
MG/L
00310 00400
HUlJ PM
5 UAY
MU/L bU
7 1.2 6.BO
2
9
8 2.0



l.?K #
OnS4b 01027
HtblDUh. CADMIUM
r SFFTL^LF. -Cl)«TOT
ML/L UG/L
31501 31616
TOT COL1 KEC COL I
MFlMENUU MFM-FCBR
/100ML /100ML
2200 20
490 2
2200 56
1000 4
2000 2



01042 010ft7 01092
COPPtK NICKFL ZINC
CU»TOT NltTOTAL 2N»TOT
UG/L UG/L UG/L












01050
LF.AfJ
Prt.SUSP
UG/L
10


0001 3? 12 2
000
000
1
\
3n
37
Ib 1
?2 2
0.

1
3
1
2
1











-------
                  -fare-
                                                                   sc?c
                                                                  4b QV 21.0 067 2.1 42.0

                                                                  ?3 MAINE
                                                                  (19)Sf.CKOlA RIVF.K
                                                                  1U1KLG1
                                                                  2
                                                                              2111204
                                                                             0000 FEET
                                                                                                 DEPTH
                                                      DESCRIPTION

                       STATION  LOCATED 500 YA*n<> HELOW DISCHARGE 1/4 WAY OFF CANAIJIAN BANK.

                                 FQ  IN 1970 As PWT OF THf UNITED STATES CANADA JOINT ST. CHOIX

                              SUKVFY.
  O«TF
  F^O*
   TO
          OF
         09 45 0001
         09 JO 0001
7?/0«/lO Ov 09 0001
         09 )S 0001
         09 15 0001
         14 15 0001
         09 40 0001
75>/0«/14 10 05 0001
7?/OP/15 09 05 0001
         14 05 0001
             00010
     OFPTH  WATFW
             TfMP
             CENT
               ?i.s
               xi. o
               20.0
               ?o.o
               19.5
               ?o.o
               ?o.o
               20.5
               20.0
               ?0.»
                                 00070
                                           00(180
                                 JTU
                                   14.0
                                    9.h
                                    4.1
                                    6.6

                                    U.b
                                    l.J
                                    0.9
                          pT-ro
                          UNITS
                                50
                                50
                                40
                                45
                                45
                                                      00
                Mii/L

                 7.7

                 6.8
                 7.0
                 6.8
                 6.6J
                 6.9

                 7.0
                 6.8J
                00310
                HOD
               > DAY
                Mu/L
                   1.2

                   1.2K

                   K2K

                   1.2K
               00400
                Ph

                SU

                 6.60
                 6.10
                 6.10
                 6.90
                 6.20
                 6.MO
                 6.70
                 o.bO
                 6.40
                 6.60
  31501     31616
TOT COLI  FEC COLI
MFIMENDO  MFM-FCB*
 /100ML    /100ML
    1100

   10000
    1000
    1600

    2100
    1300
     940
10K

 2K
 2
 4

 4
10
10
  DAT*
  F"OM
   TO
                      OOS15
         THE OFPTH PFS1IJUF
77/00/09
7P/OP/1?
7J»/Ofl/j4
OAY
         09
         09
         09
         09
         09
         10
         09
   45
   10
   00
   15
   15
   40
   05
   05
0001
OOOI
"001
0001
0001
OOOI
0001
0001
                      Mi»/L
005*5
HFC; I DUE
FIX FLT
MR/L
TOT MFLf
M6/L
00540
RESIDUE
FIX NFLT
M(i/L
                           47
 1

30

23
17
 .1
10

 9
 1
 3
1
9
8
9
0
2
1
                                                Oil545     01027     01042
                                              RESIDUE   CADMIUM   COHHEK
                                              SETILhLE  CD»TOT    CU«TuT
                                                ML/L      UG/L      UG/L
                                                         01067      01092     01050
                                                        NICKF.L    ZINC      LEAD
                                                       NltTOTAL  ZNtTOT     Pd«SUSP
                                                         UG/L       UG/L       UG/L

-------
STOPF.T RETRIEVAL OATF 73/05/15
                                                                   SC02
                                                                  45  09  21.0  067  23  43.0

                                                                  ?3  MAINE
                                                                  (01)NORTHEAST
                                                                  (19)ST.CROIX RIVER
 2111204
0000 FEET
                                                                                                 DEPTH
                                                     DESCRIPTION
                       STATION LOCATED 500 YARDS BELOW DISCHARGE MIDPOINT  IN RIVER.
                       ESTABLISHED  IN 1970 AS PART OF THE UNITED STATES CANADA JOINT ST. CROIX
                       RIVER SURVEY.
DITF
fvOM
TO
7?/OB/0«
75VOP/09
7?/0«/lO
7^/OP/l l
77/00 / l ?

7?/0**/j 1
7?/ 09/1 4
7?/ 03/15


HATF
paow
TO
7?/0 fl/0"
7?/0 Q/09
7''/fll"/l 0
7?/0 q/ 1 1
7?/Oq/l?
72/OR/l 3
TP/OP/ i*»
TJMF rjrpTH
OF
TAY
09
09
09
09
00
14
09
10
09
14

fl'Ji
OF
PAY
09
09
OS»
09
09
09
10

FFET
?o oooi
15 0001
05 "001
17 0001
40
17 0001
44 0001
IT) 0001
Ofl 0001
07 0001

C DFPTH

FCFT
?0 0001
1^ 0001
05 0001
17 0001
40
44 0001
10 0001
oe noo \
00010
WAFER
TtwP
CENT
21.5
21.0
20.0
20 .0
1^.5
20.0
?0.0
21.0
20.0
20.0
00515
DFSII.'UF
OTSS-105
C MG/L
11
21
13
23
44
34
SO
*.ft
00070
JKSN
.ITU
19.0
2.0
3.0
3.3
2.6

0.8
1.3
1.1

00525
RFSIOUF
FIX FLT
MG/L
9
11
32,
25
Ib
13
Tlti
000«0
COLf)R
PT-CO
UNITS
50
50
50
50
45

45
50
45

00510
RESIOUE
TOT NFLT
MG/L
16
2
4
7
4
2
.i
3
00299
uo
PROHE
MG/L
5.5

6.6
6.9J
6.5J
6.1J
7.1J

6.8
6.7J
00540
RESIDUE
FIX NFLT
MG/L
16
1
3
6
4
1
2
2
00310
BOQ
5 DAY
MG/L
1.2K
1.2K
1.2K
1.2K
1 .2K

1.2K
1.3
1.2K

00545
RESIOUE
SETTLHLE .
ML/L







00400
Ph

SU
6.50
6.20
6.00
6.90
6.30
6.60
6.40
6.60
6. SO
6.70
01027
CADMIUM
CDtTOT
UG/L







31501
TOT COLI
MFIMLNDO
/100ML
1600
1800
2900
1000
1000

3100
2800
920

01042
COPPER
CU»TOT
UG/L







31616
FEC COLI
MFM-FCHR
/100ML
10K
2K
800
2
2

2K
2K
12

010ft7 01092
NICKEL ZINC
NI. TOTAL ZN»TOT
UG/L UG/L




















01050
LEAD
PBfSUSP
UG/L








-------
                                                                   SC2U
                                                                  It's 09 20.0 067 23 «S«X>
                                                                  Sf Ct*ti£*
                                                                                        21U20*
                                                                                       4999 FCEf  OEMS*
SVSfFM    II     IH
                                                   vii
XI
XII
                                                      DESCRIPTION
   TO
77/nn/u
                       500  FT  OOv/NSTKEAM FROM THE OEFOAMING* LAGUON OUTFALL  AT  GEORGIA-PACIFIC

                       C&PP.»l\NO 50 FT. Ft»0* THE U.S.A. BANK* HOODLANDt MAlTME.
   TO
OF
^Y FFET
09 10 >1001
IS 10 0001
09 07 10*)1
09 ?0 0001
14 ?0 nnoo
09 45 0001
tb ?i) 0001
09 46 "001
10 IS ftOOJ
09 10 noil
14 10 0001

TT*'F OPPTH
OF
HAY FFT.T
1)9 07 0001
09 9Q OOD1
09 45 0001
09 46 0001
10 15 0001
09 10 0001
00010
TE«P
CiiNT
?6.0
?3.5
31.0
30.0
31. S
32.0
?«.n
32.0
?R.fl
OOS15
OFSIIUIF
OISS-105
r M&/L
5*i ^
4<4V
4^1
0^1
399
526
00070
IKSN
.ITU
35,0
2S.O
3.4

6.6

. J.4
42.0
7*. 5

0052-,
KP'JIOUf-
FI» FLT
MG/L
436
3i£b
?78
570
29*
350
oonso
COLrtR
PT-CO
UNITS
500
750
1250

7SO

1250
750
1000

OOS30
KfcSiOUF
TOT NFLT
MG/L
1H
3>»
42
44
4?
64
00?99
PH04E
6.0
S.2J
€.6
6.0
4.2J
7.1.
5.3J
4.1

5.7
6.2J ,
00540
RF.SIUUE
FIX NFLT
MG/L
7
22
1"9
17
15
25
00310
ttOO
5 OAlf
MU/L
40.0
50.0
RO.O

128.0

190.0
130.0
110.0

00545
RESIOUE
SETILBLE
ML/L






00400
PH
SU
5.90
7.90
6.30
12.30
9.20
9.iO
8.80
9.t>0
7.10
7.20
6.70
01027
CADMIUM
CO t TOT
UG/L






31501
T01 COL1
MF1MENOO
/100MU
5400
13000
8000

27000

29000
4200
4000

01042
COPPER
CUfTOT
tJG/l






31616
FEC COL I
MFM-FCHR
/100ML
440
6900
20

90

50
240
520

01067 61092
NICKFL ZINC
NIi TOTAL ZNtTOT
UG/L UG/L
















01050
LEAD
PBtSUSP
UG/L







-------
       HFT*TF,VAL QATF  7J/OS/IS
                                                                    SC4C
                                                                   4b OS 03.0 067  19

                                                                   J>3 MAINE
                                                                                        £040 FEET  DEPT«
                                                       DESCRI'HJIDN

                        STATION LOCATE-a AT BALING -MAINE*  4)A rt«I00E» I/* MAY  OFF  CANADIAN BANK.

                                    Itl WO AS PAUT  OF THE UNffED STAfCS CANADA  JOINT ST. CKOIX
  f)*7F

   TO
            f; DFPTH
         n? 4-5  ono?
         0* Jfl  0:00?
79/1)«/1-0 07 S5
         11 40 flOO?
         Q-A 10 WflO?
         11 55 r)'*'i?
         f)« 10 000?
         1? S55 "^00?
         0« 45 000?
         0« 55 noo?
         0« 10
         H 15
  nafF   TI»«F fJppTH
  Ft>0u    OF
   TO    n4V  FFFT  r MG/L

7'VflP/Ofl ft7 4s
7?/n«/nq fla 19  nno?
7?/OayiO 07 55  noo?
79/4i<»/]] ns 10  "00?
79/4a/1? OH 10  OQO?
79/OP/n rtft 45  100?
         0* 55  000?
         QH 10  ADO?
010
EW
M»
l«iT
?1.0
?0 . *5
??.'fl
^0.0
^l^n
I'J.O
ifl.S
IV. 0
21.9
?0 . 0
J'O.O
1^-.0
31.0
SIS
UUF
-105
i/L
14
?4
74
ss
hV
41
41
60
TUW1
lit*
?.«
3.2

4.6

3.1

2.3

?«-o
2.«*
(?.H

OOS25
RfTSItlUE
FIX FLT
MG/L
14,
13
5b
40
30
17
36
34
UNITS
*«)
f>n

ffO

70

ftO

60
60
60

OOS30
«*tSII»UE
TOT NFLT
MG/L
2
4
4
5
3
2
4
4
5*
s.s
S.9
SVln7
6.2
-6-.5J
6.4
S.7J
€.6
•
€.9

7,0
7,3J
005^0
RESIDUE '
FIX NFLT
MG/L
0.1
2
2
5
2
1
2
2
00310
800
'a DA*
2-2
1.4

2.1

2.2

2.1

2.7
3.S
2.0

0054S
KES10UE
SETTL8LE
ML/L








00400
P-M
SU
6.30
6-30
6-50
ft. SO
6.60
6-70
ft. 60
6.VO
6. BO
6.90
6.60
6. HO
6.60
01027
CADMIUM
CO»TOT
UG/L








31501
TOT COLi
KFIMEMOO
/100ML

6900

2JOO



900

3600
9000
1100

01042
COPPEN
CUt TOT
UG/L








31616
FEC COLI
MFM-FCBR
/100ML

30

1000



30

50
20
10
-
01067
NICKFL
Nit TOTAL
UG/L








                                                                                                          01092
                                                                                                        2INC
                                                                                                        ZNtTOT
                                                                                                          UG/L
  01050
LEAD
PBtSUSP
  UG/L

-------
WETOTFVAt. OAT*" 73/0«5/15
                                                           SC04
                                                          4b 08  03.0  067  19  12.0

                                                          23 MAINE
                                                          miNUrfTtiEAST
                                                          U9!S» .CRQIX RIVEK
                                                                                2111204
                                                                               OOQO FEET  DEPTH
                                              DESCRIPTION

                STATION LOCATED AT BASING MAINE* AT »« iWIOGE MIDPOINT  IN HIVEH.

                ESTABLISHED IN 1970 AS PAWT OF THE UNITED  STATEb  CANADA JOINT  ST.CROIX

                      SURVEY.
nATF
rw*
TO
7?/o*/oe
7?/0«V09

7?/0«/10

72/0 vi i

7?/oq/i?

7?/o«>/n
7?/0»/14
7?/08/lS


n«TF
F«OM
ro
7?/0»/-0»
7?/no/o<»
7?/n«/10
7?/"o/H
7?/0"/l?

7?/o«/n
7?/Ofl/14
7?/Ofl/lS
TI"F flFpTH
OF
nAY FFFT
08 OS 100?
07 S5 0002
14 ?? 000?
07 40 000?
n is ooo?
07 AS 000?
11 SO flOO?
08 OS 000?
11 03 000?
i)« 40 000?
08 45 000?
OW 05 000?
13 13 000.?

Tp*F OFPTH
OF
nflv FFET
OM OS 000?
07 SS 000?
07 tO 000?
07 45 000?
on (>i lino?
11 OS 000?
on /«o ooo?
Ofl 45 TO*)?
OH OS 000?
00010
mAffW
TEMP
CENT
21.0
21.0
?,?..S
20.0
21.0
19*<)
21.0
19.0
20.0
20.0
?fl.O
19.0
22.0
OOblS
frFSlMUF
niSS-lOS
C Mb/L
SOJ
?1
4<>
66
71
45
39
66
62
00070
TUKH
JKSN
JTU
2.6
3.0

3.H

3.2

2.7
1.0
?.l
?.M
3.0

nos?s
Ht'sinuE
FIX FLT
MG/L
IbJ
12
?.J
3b
36
21
21
31
33
000*0
COLOH
PT-CO
UNITS
70
70

70

100

60

70
60
60

OOS30
KESiQUF
TOT ^IFLT
MG/L
4J
4
<*
6
o.s
0.5
3
3
5
00299
DO
P«0.*r:
MG/L
5.8
5.8
5.2J
6.1
6.5J
6.7
6.0J
6.2

7.3
6.5J
5.9
6.0J
00540
ftFSlOUE
FIX NFLT
MG/L
42
2
3
4
0.3
0.4
1
1
3
00310
«00
5 DAY
MG/L
2.6
£.0

2.8

3.4

2.8

3,&
2.6
2.7

00545
MESIOUE '
SETTLBLE
ML/L









00400
PH

SU
6.30
6.40
6.60
6.60
6.60
6.50
6.tiO
6.90
6.70
6.60
' 6.60
6.90
6.60
010?7
CADMIUM
CD* TOT
UG/L









J1501
TOT COLI
MFIMENOO
/100ML
3000
1800
~!—^ .
3400

2600

2000

2700
5000
4100

01042
COPPER
CUt TOT
UG/L









31616
FEC COLI
MFM-FCBR
/100ML
60
70

170

220

66
*
100
24
22

01067 01092
NICKEL ZINC
M, TOTAL ZN.TOT
UG/L UG/L

























01050
LEAD
P8»SUSP
UG/L










-------
ST03F.T «KT>* OH
7?/flH/0'i 07
14
7?/0,FPT« Wftlf'*
FS>- T CEMT
JS
40
IS
IS
V)
IS
'»S
ss
AS
IS
10
ss
10




IS
40
IS
IS
^5
IS
i°
000^ ?}-.<)
•on n? /• 1 . i
'i o o ** ^* 3 . 0
**0^? I'O.S
njiri? ??.')
Of.:.>» 19. S
'in*.* ?'?.'>
000** l^.S
000? ?y».0
OflO? ' ?II.O
ona? ?.o.o
0 0 0 ? ?i) . 0
000? ??.ft
0051S
^rpfM oKSlliUF
nfSb-lOS
rcFf C MG/L
noo? fSJ
003? 51
000? 77
000? «S
001? 04
100? *>/
no^v^ KO
'lOO^ 7«.
JKSN
.ITU
2.V
1.3

4.V

»?.ri

3.3

2.8
3.2
3.4

noS?S
HFSIOt'K
FIX FLT
MQ/4-
33 J
?.6
51
67
S3
43
2^
COLDH
fT-CO
UNI rs
mo
100

100

ISO

ISO

100
100
lot)

OOH30
KKSIftUF
TOT NFLT
MG/L
7J
4
H
H
2
6
6
00*99
UU
"ii,/i
5*6
5.3
5.1J
5.4
5.4J
€.2
5.4J
5.8

5.9
5.8
6.1
6.0J
00540
HESiOUE
FIX AlFLT
MG/L
4J
1
U
6
0.1 '
2
2
00310
4UO
Mu/L
5.8
4.6

6.3

6.1

8.0

9.0
1.5
5.4

0054b
HESIOUE
SETTLBLE
ML/L







00400
PH
SU
6. HO
6.40
6.60
6. SO
6.60
6.70
7.20
6. HO
6.60
6.70
6.60
6. BO
6.90
01027
CADMIUM
CD, TOT
UG/L







31501
TOT COLT
/100ML
7900
4300

640t)

4600

3100

50V 0
7400
3400

01042
COW£rt
CUfTOT
WG/L







3i^l*
FEC COL I
/iOOML
190
80

2400

210

ISO

700
170
110

01067 01092
NICKEL ZINC
NI* TOTAL ZN.TOT
UG/L UG/L






















01050
LEAD
PBtSUSP
UG/L








-------
                                                                  SCOb
                                                                 45 10 1Z.O 067 17 51.0

                                                                 23 MAINE
                                                                 NOkTHtAST
                                                                 5T CRUIX HIVER
                                                                 1111KEG1             2111204
                                                                 2                   0999 FEET
                                                                                DEPTH
      RIVF.R
      SYSTFM
INDEX 0119001
      001*.?7
II
III
IV
VI
VII  VIII
IX
XI
XII
                                                     DESCRIPTION
       MIDPOINT IN RIVER AT RHIDGE

       *IVF.R SURVEY.
                                                             MAINE - MILLTOWN. NEW BRUNSWICK

OATF
FROM
TD
7P/OP/QP
7?/0«/09

7?/0°/10

79/00/11

79/08/1?

7?/o«/n
7?/08/14
7?/Oa/15


HftTF
fPOM
TO
7?/0«./Oa
7P/OV09
7?/00/10
7?/00,/ll
7?/0»/l2
7P/08/13
7?/08/l4
7?/0«/15

TTMF i
OF



04Y FFFT
07 IS
07 15
13 55
07 05
13 00
07 10
1.3 'IS
07 35
1?~?Q
08 00
OH 10
07 ?S
1? 40

TIMF
OF
DAY
07 IS
07 IS
07 OS
07 10
07 35
OH 00
08 10
07 ?«
ooo?
000?
000?
ooo?
000?
000?
000?
ooo?
ooo?
ooo?
000?
000?
000?

nrprn

FFET
ooo?
000?
ooo?
ooo?
ooo?
000?
000?
ooo?
00010
WATER
TEMP
CENT
?.o.s
20.5
??.o
?o.o
«*0 .5
18.5
?0.0
19.5
19.5
19. S
20.0
18.5
20.0
OOS15
BFSIUUF
oiss-ios
C'MO/L
35
30?
69
53
81
A3
65
65
00070
TUPR
JKSN
JTU
7.b
6.2

5.3

5.4

3.3

2.3
2.4
2.6

00525
RESIDUE
FIX FLT
MG/L
1
244
50
47
43
27
53
39
00080
COLOR
PT-CO
UNITS
90
75

100

70

75

100
100
70

OOS10
RFSinUF
TOT NFLT
MG/L
6
104
7
7
S
4
4
4
00299
DO
PROnE
MG/L
4.9
5.1
5.7
6.2
5.8
6.2
6.2
6.0

5.8
5.7
6.2
6.1
00540
RESIDUE
FIX NFLT
MG/L
2
38
5
6
3
1
2
3
00310
BOO
5 DAY
MG/L
3.4
2.8

3.3

2.8

4.3

5.2
5.2
4.0

00545
RESIDUE"
SETTL4LE
ML/L








00400
PM

SU
6.40
6.00
6.30
0.30
6.30
6. SO
6.40
6.80
6,60
6.60
6.30
6.70
6.6Q
01027
CADMIUM
CDtTOT
UG/L








31b01
TOT COLl
MFlMENDO
/100ML
900
250

4000

2300

3300

2100
5900
12000

01042
COHPER
CU.TOT
UG/L








31616
FEC COL I
MFM-FCHR
/100ML
10K
60

630

200

190

350
320
130

01067
NICKEL
Nlf TOTAL
UG/L

























01092
ZINC
2N.TOT
UG/L








                                                                                                                 01050
                                                                                                               LEAD
                                                                                                               PBtSUSP
                                                                                                                 UG/L

-------
«»FT>MF.VAI.
                                                           4S
                                                           •Jd* I Mr. AS I
                                                           ST C*ul<
                                                           lllHtbl
                                                           t
                                                                            oA!LtYVlLLE2
                                                                 12.0 067 23 S3.0
s
. HAlUEYvILL
00010 00070 00080 00/»99 00310
MAfFM TUkH COL'lM 00 MOU
Tf»P WSN i»:T-rO PKOriE 5 UAV
CUNT JTU UNITS MG/L M(j/L
JS.n
1*.')
i ^ n
i » . f
16.0
Ih.n
16.0
15.0
l*«.o
54.0° 60 lld.i
15. n
14.0
IS'.O
m n
1 7 . "
is.n
16.0
16.0
1»>.0
90.
16.0
1S.O
1S.O
17.0
1»>.0
17.0
16.0
15.0
S2.0
14.0
14. n
15.0
15.0
15.0
16.0
15.0
1*.0
10.0
15.0
15.0
0 >-il 5 •! i-pe, ii'i-ln fii)-i^0
^e-si"i).r KP<:|-iUf ^ h 1 -UF xFSi.|..JF
•"•I'.s-ips F|» r-LT for iFLT FI* uFLT
T " -/L ""/L M-;/L M'J/L
302 244 104 38
306 265 109 48
247 191 74 48
276 2OO 44 13
             2111204
            Of**  FEET   DEPTH
                                                                  00400     31501     31616
                                                                   PM     TOT COL I  FEC COLI
                                                                          MFlMtNDO  MFM-FCRR
                                                                   5U      /100ML    /100ML
                                                                    6.60
6.60


6.40





7.00


6.70
                                                                           1000000     50000
                                       00545
                                     SF.SIDUF.
                                     SF.TTLHLF
                                       ML/L

                                          0.5
                                          0.5
                                            9
                                            4
                                            3
        4
        6
       19
        7
        6
                                                                    6.40

                                                                    6.30
                                                                  OIO?7     01042
                                                                CADMIUM   COH^tR
                                                                COtTOT    CU»TOT
                                                                  UG/L      UG/L
                  01067      01092
                 NICKFL   ZINC
                 MItTOTAL  ZNtTOT
                  UG/L       UG/L
  01050
LEAD
PB.SUSP
  UG/L

-------
       RETRIEVAL OATF 73/05/15
                                                                                  6-P LAGOON
                                                                 45 0« 18.0 067 23 53.0

                                                                 ?3 MAINE
                                                                 NOkThtAST
                                                                 ST CKUIX
                                                                                      2111204
                                                                                     0999 FEET
                                                                                DEPTH
      RTVFR
      SYSTFM
II
III
IV
INOF.X
VI
VII  VIII
IX
XI
XII
                                                     DESCRIPTION
                       'XIMF» SIOP OF OUTFALL FROM OEFOAMING LAGOONt GEOKGIA-PACIFIC COHP.»

                      WOODLAND, "AINE.

-------
                                                                                            G-f LAGOON
                                                                          AS n«  ifl.0 Oft? 23 53.0
                                                                          ST
OflTF
F*OM
 TO
o
                OF
09
10
11
13
n
is
1'-**
17
1*
l^
                  00
17
S*
01
no
l?
10
'•••;
MS
l«i
   onoi
   oo 01
   oooi
no oi
0001
on.) l
                     0 f •'! 1
'?
?3

no
01
0?
01
04
0^
OA
07
OM
OQ
10
11
1?
11
14
IS
1ft
17
1«
Is*
?0
'1
?2
73
OS
OT

OS
00
00
00
00
on
00
no
'oo
OS
oo
0-,
<*?
Oft
Oft
OS
00
I'l
OS
10
is
0^
is
40
oo m
0001
0001
0001
0001
0001
OOn 1
0001
oo o i
o n ri i
=00 n i
onoi
OOQl
oi\ot
0001
o n '.• 1
nr.-'ii
0001
on o i
0001
0001
OOtJl
,0001
"OO'M
000)
0001
0001
              OOM in
             ««TF*
              Th'-'P
              CtMT
                               3ft. <>

                               37.0
                               '1ft. 5
                               "W . 0
                               :i7.n
                               35.0
                               31.0
                               .IS . 0
                               3-..-)
                               3ft . ')
                               3S.U
                               3S.S
                               3S.S
                               3A.O
                                       00070
                               HT-rn
                                        iru
                                                    1000
                                                        ft.l
                                                        -3.7
                                                        b.3
                                                        ft.O
                                                        h.O
                                                        6.5
                                                        ft. 5
                                                        ft. 3
                                                        ft. 3
                                                        5.9
                                                        ft. 5
                                                        h.4
                                                        ft. 4
                                                        4.2
                                                        S.5
                                                        ft.l
                                                        ft. A

                                                        b.H
                                                        S.3
                                                        F..O
                                                        t>.0
                                                        1.8
                                                        ft.O
                                                        S.H
                                                        b.7
llll^tul
2
00310 00400
HUD PM
S DAY
Mli/L SU
6.50
6.30

10.60
6.20
7.70
6.fc!0
7.50
V.20
7.20
7.00
6.30
7.00
6.00
UO.O
6.50
ft. 90
6.00
6.00
5.70
6.20
6.20
b.90
6.30
6.30

7.20
7.50
s.^0
*.BO
H.VO
M.70
7.50
6.50
^ 6.60
7.50
7.20
6.50
b.80
2111204
09V9 FEtT DEPTH
31501 31616 00545
TOf COLl FEC COLI RESIDUE
Mh IMENDU MFM-FCBK jgETTLBLE
/100ML /100ML ML/L
1.5
0.1
59000 2100 1.5
1.2
1.0
1.2
0.5
0.3
0.6
0.3
0.4
O.IK
1.2
1.2

1.0
0.1
0.5
0.5
0.2
0.1
O.IK
0.3

0.1
0.3
0.1
0.1
0.3
0.2
0.4
0.1
0.4'
0.4
0.4
0.6
0.7
0.5
1.0

-------
                  OATF  73/05/15
                                                                  SCGH            G-P LAGOON
                                                                 45 Ott 18.0 067 23 53.0
  DATF
   TO

72/OR/09
72/0 ft/ 10
TTMF
 OF
OAY  FFFT
72/Ofl/lO
72/Ofl/ll
01 PO
0? 0.0
03 00
04 00
05 00
0* 00
07 00
03 00
09 04
10 02
11 06
1? ?7
n oo
14 ??
IS 00
IS S7
17 10
1« 10
19 10
?0 OS
?\ 10
?? OS
?1 IS

00 05
01 00
0? 00
01 no
04 00
OS 00
06 00
n? 04
07 4S
0*» 07
10 ?S
12 no
n 11
is oo
0001
noni
nooi
0001
0001
nooi
0001
0001
0001
ooni
nooi
0001
nooi
nooi
0001
0001
nooi
onoi
nnoi
onoi
onm
0001
nooi
nooi
nnoi
noni
nooi
nooi
0001
onoi
nooi
noni
nooi
nnoi
no 01
noni
nooi
noo]
noni
                      oooio
       TEMP
       CENT
00070
TURrt
JKSN
JTU  •

  72.5
 oon«o
COLOr*
HT-CO
UNITS

   1500
  44.0
   1500
                                     00299
                                      DO
MG/L
   5.9
   6.1
   5.9
   6.1
   6.0
   b.H
   4.2
   4.3
   4.7
   4.5
   4.7
   5.7
   5.H
   4.6
   1.6

   2.6
   5.1
   6.0
   6.2
   5.7
   4.4
   4.b
   4.H
   4.^
   5.0
   5.2
   4.2
   4.3
   4.5
23 MAliME
NOKTHtAST
ST CKOIX
llllKltvil
2
00.310 00400
BOD PH
5 UAY
MG/L SU
190.0
6.40
8.90
H.90
6.HO
6. SO
7.0.0
7.00
6.50-
6.70
6.70
6.70
6.60

7.30
10.70
10.70
10. 00
11.30
11.30
6.10
7.40
H.ttO
9.70
220.0
9.20
7.bO
7.00
7.00
8.90
9.bO
9.40
9.80
9.10
6.60

9.50
9.60
V.20



2111204
0999 FEET DEPTH
31501 31616 00545
TO! COL I FEC COLI RESIDUE
MFIMENOO MFM-FCBR SETTLBLE
/100ML /100ML ML/L

0.1
O.IK
1.0
0.5
O.IK
1.0
0.2

0.2
48000 16000 0.3
0.5
1.5
0.3
2.0
0.4
1.4
1.0
1.0
0.7
1.0
1.0
0.5
1.3

2.1
1.9
2.0
2.1
2.0
2.5
1.8
2.5
2.6
3200 200 1.5
0.5
1.5
1.0


-------
STOOF.T RETRIEVAL  OATF  73/05/15
                                                                    SCKP            G-P LAGOON
                                                                   4S OH 1«J.O 067 23 53.0
DATF
FROM
TO
7?/0
-------
        f?ET«TFVAL
  OATF   TIM
  F«»OM    OF
   TO    n/>Y
               OFRTH
             00
         01  10
         01  00
         04  10
    *    Ofe  00
7?/0«/14 07  10
         0«  OS
         10  T?
11 10
IS 01

1« IS

?\ ilO
•»•> 10
yu oo

01 10
01 oo
04 10
0* 00
07 10
00 01
10 "»!
                OPOl
                "001
      0001
oooi
OPOl
000 1
ooni
npn)
op»l
oooi
000)
0001
OPl'l
1001
OPOl
0001
•10 01
oooi
0"01
oooi
onoi
OOOI

"001
          i ? 07 o o ;i
          11 in
7P/00/1*-  01  10
          01 .00  0001
          nt,  10  nooi
          OA  on  oooi
          07  10  0001
          IA  10 0001
          j M  oo onoi
          19  10 0001
          ?1  T^ 0001
          ??  10 OOOJ
          ?1  co
                       00010
                       TUMP
                       CtNT
                          HS.O
                          JS.ll
                          •4S.O
                            . S
                          36.1
                          36. S
                          36. S
                          16.0
                          36. S
                          31.0
                          11.0
                          31.0
                          MS.S
                          JS.S
                         'IS.')
                         
                         1*),0
                         -«S. >
                         »^.0
                         1«..S

                         .11.0
                         :«j?.o
                         3*.o
                         'Jtt.O
                         34.0
                                                                                      li-H  LAf>0(JN
                                                                        OH 1H.O 067 23  53.0
                                                                     ST  CKOIX
                        00070
                        TijWH
                        .IKSN
                         ITU
                                     2.8
                                            OOOMO
                                       00.299
                                        UO
                           PT-ro
                           UMTS
 00310
 •iUI)
T UAY
                                                       MG/L
                                              1500
                                                         220.0
                                    63.0
                                                                  150.0
                                                                                               FKET  OEHTH
0400
CM

SU
/.70
7.40
•j.hO
H.UO
/.so
6.10
7.10
7.40
b.40
f.OO
9.40
g.^0
V.10
6. MO
7.30
7.40
7.40
/.70
6.40
6.40
b.bO
b.60
6.bO

h.VO
M.SO
7.00
9.bO
H.?0
7.00
6. SMI
6. Ml)
b.bO
6.40
b.bO
7.30
b.bO
6.40
31501 31616 00545
TUT COL I f-EC COL I RESIDUE
HFlMtNOU MFM-FCbH SETTLBLE
X100ML /100ML ML/L
1.5
1.7
1.0
0.9
2.0
1.0
6100 200 1-0
1.5
0.5
1.5
2.0
1.5
1.2
0.8
1.0
0.8
1.0
1.1
0.6
1.0
0.9
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.5
0.5
1.5
2.5.
3.0
2.5
2.0
1.0
0.8
0.7
2.1
1.5
1.8


-------
ST03PT RETRIEVAL OATf  7J/05/15
                                                                                    U-P LAGOON
                                                                   4«s 01 lfl.0 067 23 53.0
                                                                                      2111204
                                                                                     099* fEET
                                                                   ST  0
                                                                                                  DEPTH
r>ATF
Fun>*
 TO
 OF
OAY
                     C rtti/L
7P/OH/15
oool
onoi
1001
no 01
000)
0001
0001
                       11:11
                       I?'**
                        933
                               FIX I-LT
                                    t \t
                                    T-.<>
TOT »jFl
  Mti/L
  010?7
CADMIUM
COtTOT
  UG/L
                                                                     01042      010*7     01092     01050
                                                                  COHPt«      NICKEL   ZINC      LEAD  .
                                                                  CUtTOT     NltTOTAL  2N.TOT    PBfSUSP
                                                                     UG/L       UG/L      UG/L      UG/L
                                    592
                          909
431
534
           S7
           M
          1-V
           73
71
64
35
41
33
31
 8
                                                                            (fOK
                                                                            20K
                                                                               64
                                                                               7h
                                                                               6M
                                                                               /O
                                                                               44
                                                                               36
                                                         40K
                                                         40K
                                                         40K
                                                         40K
                                                         40K
                                                         40K
                                                         40K
                                    200
                                    170
                                    150
                                    100
                                    120
                                    130
                                    110

-------
APPENDIX  D

-------
                         ST. CROIX RIVER STUDY
                              AUGUST 1972
                   ISOLATION OF KLEBSIELLA PN3UMONIAE
    As a result of research conducted by EPA's Duluth and Corvallis

Laboratories, members of the genus Klebsiella had been isolated from the

effluent of paper mills.  Consequently the isolation of this organism

from the effluent of the Georgia Pacific Corporation at Woodland,  Maine

and in samples taken from stations along the St.  Croix was undertaken.

    Members of the genus Klebsiella are included in the family Entero-

bacteriaceae (1,3,8,13) and comprise one of the group of bacteria

commonly referred to as the "coliform" group.  Coliform bacteria are

defined as Gram-negative, rod-shaped, non-sporeforming bacteria capable

of fermenting lactose with the production of gas  within Ij8 hours of

incubation at 3£°C.  Moreover, Klebsiella has the same appearance  as

Type I coliforms on both m-Endo and m-Fc media and can be distinguished

from them only on the basis of a series of biochemical tests referred

to as the IM ViC series.  Furthermore, this group possesses the same

reactions for the IM ViC series as Enterobacter aerogenes (Aerobacter-

aerogenes). and until recently it was difficult to differentiate the

majority of Klebsiella pneumoniae cultures from Aerobacter aerogenes.

The source from which the organism was isolated generally dictated the

classification given to it.  As a result of studies concerned with the

relationships of these two genera, differentiation between these groups

is made on motility, presence of a capsule, and a series of biochemical
                       *                      %
tests (3,7,12,19,21,29,30).  In contrast to the innocuous Enterobacter.

members of Klebsiella were reportedly found in the fecal matter of $%
                                 D-l

-------
of humans (2,6,8,9,15,17,28) but in smaller numbers than the fecal



coliform (Type I) and was used as an indicator of fecal pollution in



the past but was replaced by Escherichia coli.  It can, therefore, be



considered as "normal flora1'.



    While there is no question concerning the significance of the



presence of E. Coli in water, the same is not true for the presence



Kl. pneumoniae.  Its significance in an environment has yet to be



reconciled, and has resulted in research to assess whether any sig-



nificance exists.



    Because this organism was isolated from pulp mill effluents,  the



National Council for Air and Stream Improvement, Inc. (NCASI), the



environmental voice of the pulp and paper industry, engaged in a program



aimed at assessing the sanitary significance of this organism in re-



ceiving waters.  The program included a review of public health litera-



ture on the epidemiology of Klebsiella as they may be related to water



borne incidence and a field investigation of the prevalence of Kl.



pneumoniae in common environmental situations (10,11,11*).



    In the former review, confined almost exclusively to the occur-



rence of klebsiella infection in the hospital environment, the in-



ference is that hospital admission with klebsiella infections is



meager and that there is, at present, no evidence that the presence



of Klebsiella  in waters has been a factor in the epidemiology of Kl.



pneumoniae infections in humans (lU).



    In the latter instance the field investigations were concerned



with the isolation of Klebsiella from a conifer forest.  Samples of
                                  D-2

-------
Water, soil, needles and bark from three different forest environ-



ments and from logs at a paper and pulp mill were examined.   Of 123



isolates, 11% were classified as Klebsiella (11).



    The occurrence of Klebsiella in this forest environment prompted



an investigation of the occurrence of these organisms on fruits and



vegetables, especially those consumed raw in salads. (10)  Radishes,



lettuce, tomatoes, celery, beets, carrots and green onions were pur-



chased from a supermarket and examined.  Klebsiella were isolated from



all samples.



    As a result of these findings, the NCA3I feels that the source



should be considered before any significance is attributed to the iso-



lation of these organisms.  No significance would be attributed to



those organisms isolated from a common environment while those isolated



from a clinical environment would be significant.  In addition, they



would further like serological typing of isolates performed and these



types compared with those that have a clinical history.  If the organ-



ism has no clinical history, then it would be considered innocuous.



      However, other investigations tend to classify Klefasiella as a



pathogen (disease producer) and consider its presence a potential



hazard.  The organism was first isolated by Friedlander in 1682 and



has been recognized as the occasional cause of severe pulmonary pneu-



monia. (6, 8)  While the incidence of Klebsiella pneumonia is small,



the mortality rate is generally higher than is seen is pneumococcal



pneumonia. (12)
                                   D-3

-------
    A wide variety of other types of infections caused by Klebsiella


pneumoniae have been observed.  The second most common cause of urinary


tract infections is Klebsiella pneumoniae (5>).  Other infections caused


by this organism such as post-operative infections, lesion infections


and intra-abdominal sepsis have been observed in hospitalized patients.



In addition Klebsiella bacteremia has been reported in Boston City


Hospital (Ij, 16, 17) and other hospital-acquired Klebsiella pneumoniae


has been reported at 'Johns Hopkins Hospital (27).


    The mortality rate resulting from Klebsiella pneumoniae infection


was high until the advent of antibiotics.  While treatment with anti-


biotic has reduced the mortality, it has also created another problem.


Klebsiella pneumoniae has the propensity to become antibiotic resistant.


Variable resistance to tetracycline, chloramphenicol, streptomycin,


Kanamycin, neomycin, and the cephalosporin drugs have been reported


(Eickhoff).  The penicillins have no useful activity against Klebsiella.


Furthermore, it was shown that hospital acquired infections of Kleb-


siella tend to be more drug resistant than those acquired outside the


hospital.  The epidemiology of Klebsiella infections has not been


established, but studies conducted in regard to this problem tend to


incriminate colonization by this organism as the cause.  This colonr-


zation may occur in the patient, staff, equipment or food of the
                           n

hospital (18> 22, 23).  Because Klebsiella is responsible for many


types of infections, and colonization with this organism seems to be


the foremost incriminating factor associated with infection, then it


seems imperative that this organism should be restricted in our environ-


ment.  In view of this information, the presence of Kl. pneumoniae

-------
in water signifies the presence of a pathogeaic organism.



    Because this organism is associated with pulp mill wastes and is



considered to be of sanitary significance, the isolation of this organ-



ism from the Georgia-Pacific effluent was undertaken.   Samples were



collected at each of the stations listed on the map (Foldout 1) of the



survey area.  The frequency with which each station was tested varied,



but samples from the clear-water station and from the  mill effluent



were tested for six consecutive days.  The presence of Klebsiella



pneumoniae was determined by randomly selecting at least 10$ of the



typical colonies on 2h-hour m-Endo and m-FC plates and running as



many of the tests listed in Table I as were necessary  for  positive



identification.  At least one positive culture from each of the sta-



tions where Klebsiella pneumoniae was isolated was sent to the Center



for Disease Control, Atlanta, Georgia, for confirmation and serolo-



gical typing.  The results of the Klebsiella pneumoniae isolation are



given in Tables II and III and those obtained from CDC in  Table IV.



    To briefly summarize the findings, Klebsiella pneumoniae was not



isolated from the stations located above the effluent  from the mill,



but was isolated from the mill effluent and the stations located down-



stream of the effluent.  While other investigators successfully iso-



lated Kl. pneumoniae from natural environments, which  included fresh



water (2h, 2£, 26), all attempts during this survey were unsuccessful.



Therefore, the conclusion can be drawn that the river  is not the source



of this organism in the mill effluent.  Since this organism was



isolated from the mill effluent every time it was tested,  it appears
                                    D-5

-------
                  TABLE I
*CHARACTERISTICS OF KLEBSIELLA PNEUMONIAE
Test

Gram Stain

Capsule (India Ink)

TSI Slant

TSI Butt

Indol

Methyl Red

Voges - Proskauer
 (Acetylmethyl Carbinol)

Citrate Utilization

Hydrogen Sulfide Production
 (TSI and SIM)

Urease

Motility (SIM and Hanging Drop)

Gelatin

Lysine Decarboxylase

Arginine Dihydrolase

Ornithine Decarboxylase

Phenylalanine Deaminase

Malonate

Glucose Fermentation

Lactose Fermentation

Sucrose Fermentation
                                           Reaction

                                           Negative

                                           Positive

                                           Acid

                                           Acid and Gas

                                           Negative

                                           Negative

                                           Positive


                                           Positive

                                           Negative


                                           Positive

                                           Negative

                                           Negative

                                           Positive

                                           Negative

                                           Negative

                                           Negative

                                           Positive

                                           Positive

                                           Positive

                                           Positive
                      D-6

-------
TABLE II
FREQUENCY OF TESTING SAMPLE STATIONS FOR

Station

SC-KU
SC-01
SC-02
SC-2C
SC-2D
SC-2U
SC-04
SC-4C
SC-4U
SC-05
SCB-1
SCB-2
SCG-P
ISOLATION OF

No. No. of Times

7
1
6
7
6
5
4
4
3
4
1
4
6
KL. PNEUMONIAE

Tested No. of Times
Klebsiella
Isolated

0
0
0
2
1
2
1
1
1
3
1
1
6

% of Time
Klebsiella
Isolated

0%
0%
0%
28.5%
16.7%
40%
25%
25%
33%
75%
100%
25%
100%
       P-7

-------
TABLE III
KLEBSIELLA PNEUMONIAE DATA AS RELATED TO OTHER COLIFORM
Station
Number
SC-2C

SC-2D
SC-2U

SC-04
SC-4C
SC-4U
SC-05


SCB-1
SCB-2
SCG-P





Date
Collected
8/10/72
8/12/72
8/8/72
8/9/72
8/11/72
8/11/72
8/8/72
8/9/72
8/9/72
8/13/72
8/14/72
8/8/72
8/11/72
8/8/72
8/10/72
8/11/72
8/12/72
8/13/72
8/14/72
Total Coli
Count/lOOml
10 , 000
1,600
2,200
5,400
8,000
2,600
3,200
4,300
2,500
2,100
5,900
13,000,000
7,500,000
59,000
48,000
3,200
1,200
9,800
6,100
Fecal Coli
Count/lOOml
4
20
440
20
220
90
80
60
350
320
420,000
90,000
2,100
16,000
200
100
100
200
No. of Kl. % of
DATA
Coli Identified
pneumoniae/lOOml as Kl. pneumonae
10
100
100
400
1,000
500
200
100
100
100
100
100,000
100,000
800
8,000
300
200
200
300
a*
6.25
4.5
7.2
12.5
19.2
6.25
2.3
4
4.8
1.6
0.8
1.3
38
16.7
9.4
6.25
2
5
     D-8

-------
                             TABLE IV

                  Results of *Serological Tyging
              of Klebsiella pneumoniae Isolated from
                       the St. Croix River
Identification
Number of Culture

     EPA-1

     EPA-2

     EPA-3

     EPA-4

     EPA-5

     EPA-6

     EPA-7

     EPA-8

     EPA-9

     EPA-10
Station Number
of Isolation

    SC-4C

    SC-2D

    SCB-1

    SCG-P

    SC-05

    SC-4U

    SC-2U

    SC-04

    SCG-P

    SCG-P
Serological
Type

   Type-24

   Type-31

   Type-6

   Type-66

   Insufficient Capsule

   Type-44

   Type-10

   Type-66

   Type-9

   Type-6
*Performed by Center for Disease Control,

 Atlanta, Georgia.
                                  D-9

-------
then that the source must be the Georgia-Pacific complex.  The per-


sistence of what was identified as A. aerobacter in wood and wood


products was reported in 1931 and the presence and growth of capsu-


lated bacteria, identified as coliforms, was considered to be respon-


sible for pulp slime. (20)  Conceivably, these organisms could have


been Kl. pneumoniae.  The source of the organism could possibly be the


logs used in the pulping process since Kl. pneumoniae was successfully


isolated from bark and logs at pulp mills (11).


    Another source of the organism downstream from the effluent could


also be from the municipal sewage.  Samples of this waste were posi-


tive for Kl. pneumoniae.  However, it is interesting to note that the


capsular types isolated further downstream did not match the capsular


type isolated from the sewage outfall.  The mill effluent, however,


contained the type isolated downstream.


    Regardless of what the ultimate source of these organisms might be,


the significant aspect is that they were isolated from the mill efflu-


ent.  While no evidence exists that incriminates the presence of


Klebsiella pneumoniae in water with Klebsiella infections, there should


be concern with the potential hazard presented by them.  Since "colon-


ization" by this organism is related to its infectivity, every oppor-


tunity to prevent this should be taken.  In the past, this organism was
       »

overlooked because of the lack of methodology for identification.


Today, however, a higher degree of precision in taxonomy is evident,


and for this reason the isolation of this organism from a water en-


vironment is significant.
                                   D-10

-------
*Characteristics compiled from:




 Diagnostic Microbiology




 Bailey/  W. R.  and Scott, E.  G.




 3rd Edition, C. F. Mosby Co.,  St.  Louis,  1970




 Begey's  Manual of Determinative Bacteriology




 The Williams and Wilkins Co.




 Baltimore, Md., 1957




 Bacterial and Mycotic Infections of Man




 Dubos, R. J. and Hirsch, J.  C., 4th Ed.




 J.  B.  Lippincott, Co., 1965
                             D-ll

-------
                             REFERENCES

1.  American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association
Water Pollution Control Federation, 1971.  Standard Methods for the
Examination of Water and Wastewater. 13th Ed. American Public Health Assoc.,
New York.

2.  Baehr, G., G. Schwarteman, and E. B. Greenspan, 1937.  Bacillus
Friedlander Infections.  Ann. of Int. Med. 10;1788-1801.

3.  Bailey, W. R., and E. G. Scott, 1966.  Diagnostic Microbiology
The S. V. Mosby Co., St. Louis.

4.  Barrett, F. F., J. I. Casey, and M. Finland, 1968.  Infections and
Antibiotic use Among Patients at Boston City Hospital, Feb 1967.  New
England J. Med. 278:5.

5.  Blazevic, D. J., J. E. Stemper, and J. M. Madsen, 1972.  Organisms
Encountered in Urine Cultures over a 10-Year Period, Appl. Microbiol.
23; 421-422.

6.  Breed, R. S., E. G. D. Murray, and N. R. Smith, 1957.  Bergey's Manual
of Determinative Bacteriology.  Williams and Wilkins Co., Baltimore.

7.  Cowan, S. T., K. J. Steel, C. Shaw, and J. P. Duguid, 1960.  A
Classification of the Klebsiella Group, J. Gen. Microbiol. 23;601.

8.  Dubos, R. J., and J. G. Hirsen, 1965.  Bacterial and Mycotic Infections
of Man, J. B. Lippincott Co., Philadelphia.

9.  Dudgeon, L. S. 1927.  A Study of Intestinal Flora Under Normal and
Abnormal Conditions, J. of Hyg. 25;119.

10.  Duncan, D. W. 1972.  Occurrence of Klebsiella pneumoniae in Common
Environmental Situations, U. Fruit and Vegetables.  Personal Communication.

11.  Duncan, D. W., and W. E. Razzell, 1972.  Occurrence of Klebsiella
pneumoniae in Common Environmental Situations.  I. Isolates from an Evergreen
Forrest.  Personal Communication.

12.  Edmonson, E. B., and J. P. Sanford, 1967.  The Klebsiella-Enterobacter
(Aerqbacter) - Sefratia Group.  A Clinical and Bacteriologic Evaluation.
Medicine 46:323.

13.  Edwards, P. R., and W. H. Ewing., 1962.  Identification of Entero-
bacteriaceae.  Burgess Publishing Co., Minneapolis.
                                  D-12

-------
14.  A Review with Reference to the Water-Borne Epidemic logic Significance
of 1C. pneumoniae Presence in the Natural Environment.  National Council of
the Paper Industry for Air and Stream Improvement.  Stream Improvement
Technical Bulletin No. 254.

15.  Eller, C. , and F. F. Edwards, 1968.  Nitrogen-Deficient Medium in the
Differential Isolation of Klebsiella and Enterobacter from FECES.  Appl.
Microbiol. 16 ; 896

16.  Kislak, J. W. , T. C. Eickhoff, and M. Finland, 1964.  Hospital-Acquired
Infections and Antibiotic Usage in the Boston City Hospital - January 1964.
New. Eng. J. Med. 271:834.

17.  Leading Article, 1971- Bacteria in Faeces and Food.  Lancet £:

18.  Leading Article, 1971.  Epidemiology of Klebsiella Infections.
Lancet,
19.  Matsen, J. M. 1970.  Ten Minute Test for Differentiating Between
Klebsiella and Enterobacter Isolates.  Appl. Microbiol. 19:438.

20.  Parr, L. W. 1939.  Coliform Bacteria.  Bact. Rev. .3_:.l.

21.  Ramirez, M. J. 1968.  Differentiation of Klebsiella- Enterobacter
(Aerobacter) - Serratia by Biochemical Tests and Antibiotic Susceptibility.
Appl. Microbiol. 16:10:1548.

22.  Selden, R. , S. Lee, W. L. Low, J.V. Bennett, and T. C. Eickhoff, 1971.
Nosocomical Klebsiella Infections:  Intestinal Colonization as a Reservoir.
Ann. Int. Med. 74:657.

23.  Shooter, R. A., E. M. Cooke, M. C. Faires, A. L. Bread en, and S. M.
O'Farrell, 1971.  isolation of Escherichia Coli , Pseudomonas Aeruginosa ,
and Klebsiella from Food in Hospitals, Canteens and Schools.  Lancet. £:416

24.  Taylor, C. B. 1941.  Bacteriology of Fresh Water, II. The Distribution
and Types of Coliform Bacteria in Lakes and Streams.  J. Hyg. 41:17.

25.  Taylor, C. B. 1942.  The Ecology and Significance of the Different Types
of Coliform Bacteria Found in Water, J. Hyg. 42:23.

26.  Taylor, C. B. 1942. Bacteriology of Fresh Water III.  The types of
Bacteria Present in Lakes and Streams and Their Relationship to the Bacterial
Flora of Soil, J. Hyg. 42; 284.

27.  Thoburn, R. , F. -R. Fekety, Jr., L. E. Cluff, and V. B. Melvin, 1968.
Infections Acquired by Hospitalized Patients.  Arch. Intern. Med.
(Chicago).  121:1.
                                   D-13

-------
28.   Thone, B. T.,  1970 - Klebsiella in Faeces, Lancet Zi  1033

29.   Traub, W. H.,  E. A. Raymond, and J. Linehan, 1970 - Identification
     of Enterobacteriaceae in the Clinical Laboratory, Appl. Microbiol.
     20_:  303

30.   Wolfe, M. W.,  and S. Amsterdam, 1968, New Diagnostic System for
     the Identification of Lactose - Fermenting Gram - Negative Rods,
     Appl. Microbiol. 16;  1528
                               D-14

-------
APPENDIX E

-------
                         ST. CROIX RIVHR STUDY
                              AUGUST 1972
                    QUALITATIVE BIOLOGICAL SURVEY"
    During Agusut 1972 personnel from the Environmental Protection

Agency Region I conducted a qualitative biological survey of benthic

invertebrates in the St. Croix River.  Benthic invertebrates are those

organisms living in and crawling on the bottom sediments.  Twenty-

four stations were selected for biological examination.  Three control

stations were selected upstream from Kellyland, Maine and one in

Mohannas S.trean, a clean water tributary to the St. Croix River down-

stream from the Georgia-Pacific mill at Woodland, Maine.  Eight stations

were selected in the wood wet storage area to show the effects of log

ponding, and 12 more were selected downstream from the Georgia-Pacific

mill.  These stations are shown in Foldout 2 at the rear of the report

and described in Table E-l.

    Respectively stations SCB10, SCB11 and SCB12 are representative of

fast flowing, slow flowing and ponded water reaches which have been

free from logging operations for several years.  Station MC10 provides

information about benthic invertebrates which are naturally indigenous

to the area around Baring Basin.  Three transects comprising eight

stations were selected in the wet storage area, and four transects

comprising 12 stations downstream from the mill were selected to obtain

an adequate biological assessment of water quality in the St. Croix

River.
                                  E-l

-------
                                                 TABLE E-l
                                             STATION LOCATIONS
                                           ST. CROIX RIVER STUDY
                                                 AUGUST 1972
                                             BENTHOS STATIONS
STATION
SCB10
SCB11
SCB12*
SCB13C
LATITUDE
o  '  "
'   LONGITUDE
   «  i   »
SCB13U
SCB14C
SCB14M
SCB14U
SCB15C
            45 18 02      67 27 40
            45 17 59
            45 16 28
            45 12 35
SCB13M*     45 12 33
            45 12 32
            45 11 01
            45 10 56
            45 10 51
              67 28 05
              67 29 49
              67 25 52
                          67 25 55
              67 25 58
              67 24 32
              67 24 39
              67 24 44
            45 10 41      67 23 54
                                                                      DESCRIPTION
                   St. Croix River 1,000' downstream from Landmark 175, three feet from
                   U.S.A. bank, T1R1, Maine.

                   St. Croix River 2,000' southwest of Landmark 175 near downstream tip
                   of island midpoint in river, T1R1, Maine.

                   Grand Falls Flowage midway between scow Point and point of land north-
                   west of Kellyland, Maine.

                   St. Croix River 5,000' downstream from Landmark 188 at log boom, 10'
                   from Canadian bank, Baileyville, Maine.

                   St. Croix River 5,000' downstream from Landmark 188, at log boom mid-
                   point in the river, Baileyville, Maine.

                   St. Croix River 5,000' downstream from Landmark 188, at log boom, 15'
                   from U.S.A. bank, Baileyville, Maine.

                   Woodland Pond 3,000' downstream from Landmark 191 one-quarter way from
                   Canadian bank.
                                                                                      ' ;-.'-Jaft«.
                   Woodland Pond 3,000' downstream from Landmark 191 midpoint in river,
                   Baileyville, Maine.

                   Woodland Pond 3,000' downstream from Landmark 191 one-quarter way from
                   U.S.A. bank, Baileyville, Maine.

                   Woodland Pond 6,000* downstream from Landmark 191 one-quarter way from
                   Canadian bank.
          *• Benthic  rcspirometer  station

-------
STATION     LATITUDE
SCB16U
SCHISM
               i  it
SCB1SM      45 10 36
45 09 19
 3 07 5.'5
              LONGITUDE
              o  '   "

              67 24 07
SCB15U      45 10 32      67 24 22
SCB16C      45 09 21      67 23 40
SCB16M      45 09 21      67 23 38
67 23 38
SCB17C*     45 08 53      67 22 36


SCB17M*     45 08 52      67 22 38


SCB17U      45 03 52      67 22 43

SUJICC*     '»5 07 57      67 19 23
67 19 16
                                            TABLE E-l continued
                                             STATION LOCATIONS
                                            ST. CROIX RIVER STUDY
                                                 AUGUST 1972
                                             •BENTHOS STATIONS
                                                DESCRIPTION
Woodland Pond 6,000" downstream from Landmark 191, midpoint in river,
Baileyville, Maine.

Woodland Pond 6,000' downstream from Landmark 191, one-quarter way
from U.S.A. bank, Baileyville, Maine.

500' downstream from defoaming lagoon outfall at Georgia-Pacific Corp.,
5' from Canadian bank opposite Woodland, Maine.

500' downstream from defoaming lagcon outfall at Georgia-Pacific Corp.,
midpoint in river Woodland, Maine.

700' downstream from defoaming lagoon outfall at Georgia-Pacific Corp.,
5' from U.S.A. bank Woodland, Maine.

1,000' downstream from Landmark 197, 5' from Canadian bank opposite
Baileyville, Maine.

1,000 downstream from Landmark 197, 500' downstream from Lau^hiark 198,
midpoint in river near downstream tip of island, Baileyville, Maine.

51 from U.S.A. bank opposite Landmark 198, Baileyville, Maine.

700' downstream from Landmarks 205 & 206, 20' from Canadian bank opposite
Baring, Maine.

800' downstream from Landmarks 205 & 206, midpoint in river at Baring,
Maine.
        '«  IJf.'iiLliic iro.:?pifoneter station

-------
STATION
SCB18U
SCB19C
SCB19M*
SCB20C*
SCB20U*
SCB21M*
MC10*
GF01*
LATITUDE
o ' "
45 07 51
45 09 12
45 09 13
45 10 12
45 10 09
45 08 46
45 09 13
45 14 52
LONGITUDE
0 ' "
67^ 19 08
67 17 49
67^17 45
67 17 59
67 17 53
67 18 11
67 19 52
67 31 57
                                   TABLE E-l continued
                                   STATION  LOCATIONS
                                  ST.  CROIX  RIVER STUDY
                                       AUGUST  1972
                                   BENTHOS  STATIONS
                                                             DESCRIPTION
                                 1,400'  east  of  Landmark  206,  5'  from U.S.A.  bank,  Baring,  llaine.

                                 10'  from Canadian  bank opposite  Magurrcwock  Stream,  Calais,  Maine.

                                 Midpoint In  river  opposite  Magurrcwock Stream,  Calais»  Maine.

                                 200'  upstream from bridge at  Mill town, Maine -  Milltown, NtiW Brunswick,
                                 5*  from Canadian bank.

                                 200'  upstream from .bridge at  Milltown, Maine -  Milltown, New Brunswick,
                                 5*  from U.S.A.  bank.

                                 1700* downstream from Landmark 211 5'  from Canadian  bank opposite large
                                 island  in Baring Basin,  Baring,  Maine.

                                 Midpoint in  Mohannas Stream  at "oxbow" in stream.

                                 Grand Falls  Plowage near southerly tip of island west of Lamb's Place,
                                 Baileyville, Maine.
*  Benthic respirometer station

-------
    Samples were collected with a Petersen dredge.   The  dredge was


placed on the bottom at wading locations  and lowered from  a boat in


deeper water.  However, in certain areas  large debris, i.e.,  bark


and pulp wood, necessitated the use of scuba divers  to place  the


Petersen dredge on the bottom of the wet  storage area.


    A clean water environment is characterized by a  diversity of bottom


dwelling organisms (benthos).  Conversely, degraded  or polluted  areas


are characterized by less benthos diversity and/or a predominance of


pollution tolerant species.  Areas subjected to extreme  pollution or


toxicity are devoid of benthos.


    The substrate of the control stations supported  1? to  19  kinds of


invertebrates associated with clean water environments.  Clean water
                                                                 r

organisms such as mayfly and caddis larvae were found at all  control


stations.  Other clean water forms, found at some but not  all control


stations, were stone fly, alderfly and dobsonfly larvae,  waterpennies,


seedshrimp, waterflea, sponge and copepod.  Identifications of all


organisms found are listed in Table E-2 and population counts at


selected stations are in Table E-3.


    At stations SCB13U and SCB13C respectively, nine and lU kinds of


benthos were present.  These stations compare favorably  with  the con-


trol station SCB11 which had 19 kinds of  invertebrates.  Although the
                                                               9

substrata was overlain with pulp logs, a  deterioration benthic popu-


lation was not observed.  (See Table E-U.)


    Moving downstream to the two other transects in  the  wet storage


area SCBlli and SCBl£; diversities declined to four and seven  kinds of


life.  Glean water organisms such as mayfly and caddis larvae, seed-


shrimp and waterfleas were not present.  The extent  and  density  of



                                   E-5

-------
                    TABLE E-2
      ST. CROIX RIVER STUDY - AUGUST 1972
IDENTIFICATION OF BOTTOM ORGANISMS (QUALITATIVE)
ORGANISMS
PLECOPTERA (STONEFLIES)
EPHEMEROPTERA (MAYFLIES)
TRICHOPTERA (CADDISFLIES)
NEUROPTERA
SIALIDAE (ALDERFLIES)
CORYDALIDAE (DOBSONFLIES)
ODONATA
ANISOPTERA (DRAGONFLY)
ZYGOPTERA (DAMSELFLY)
DIPTERA (FLIES, MIDGES)
TENDIPEDIDAE
CULICIDAE
SIMULIDAE
TABANIDAE
COLEOPTERA (BEETLES)
PSEPHENIDAE
HALIPLIDAE
STATIONS
CONTROL
MC10


X
X




X


X


X



SCB10

X
X
X

X
X

X
X

X

X


X

SCB11

.
X
X

X
X

X


X


X


X
SCB12


X
X

X


X


X






WET STORAGE
SCB13
U

X








X






•»
J

1C


X


X


X






SCB14
U










X
X





M










X






c










X






SCB15
U










X






M




X
X




X






C







X


X






DOWNSTREAM FROM THE
GEORGIA - PACIFIC MILL
SCB16
U

















M


X







X






C

X
X







X

X




SCB17
U

















M










X






C

X
X







X

X




s
U


X







X






B18
j'










X






c










X






SCB19
U








X

X






M










X






c










X







-------
TABLE E-2 continued
ORGANISMS
ELIUDAE
CHRYSOMELIDAE
» *
GASTROPODA (SNAILS)
HYDROBIIDAE
PLANORBIDAE
ANCYLIDAE
VIVIPARIDAE
PHYSIDAE
LYMNAEDIAE
PELECYTODA (CLAM)
3 LIGOCHAETA (WORM)
TUBIFICIDAE
UNIDENTIFIED
HIRUDINEA (LEECH)
NEMATODA (ROUNDWORM)
TRICLADIDA (PLANARIAN) .
AMPHIPODA (SCUD)
STATIONS

MC10

X

X





X


X
X


X
CONTROL
SCB10


X
X





X


X



X
SCB11


X
X
X
X
X
X

X


X
X


X
SCB12




X




X


X
X
X
X
X
WET STORAGE
SCB13
U





X

X
X


X
X

X
X
r»


X
X

X


X


X
X
X
X
X
SCB1A
U





X




X





M


X





X

X


X

X
U








X

X


X
X
X
SCB15
U








X

X

X

X
X
M








*

X




X
c










X



X
X
DOWNSTREAM FROM THE
GEORGIA- PACIFIC MILL
SCB16
U
















M








X



X


X
"1


X
X
X



X



X

X
X
SCB17
U










X





M


X





X

X

X



j
X

X







X

*
X

K
SCB18
U

X

X



X


X

•


X'
M










X

X



*










X


K


SCB19
U


X




X
X

X

X


X
M







X


X





;







X


X

X




-------
TABLE E-2 continued
ORGANISMS
ISOPODA (SOWBUG)
HYDRACARINA (HATER MITE)
OSTRACODA (SEED SHRIMP)
CLADOCERA (WATER FLEA)
PORIFERA (SPONGE)
HYDROZOA (HYDRA)
COEEPODA
TOTAL KINDS
STATIONS
CONTROL
MC10



X




12
SCB10








15
SCB11



X




19
SCB12

X

X
X
X

X
17
WET STORAGE
SCB13
U







9
C •
X






14
SCB14
U







4
M
X






7
C
X






7
SCB15
U
X






7
M
X




.

7
C
X
X





7
DOWNSTREAM FROM THE
GEORGIA - PACIFIC MILL
SCB16
U







0
M
X






6
C
X



X
X

14
s
U







1
:BI?
M
X

X




7
C
X


X



12
SCB18
U







7
M







3
C







3
SCB
U
X






9
M
X






4
9
C
X






5

-------
            TABLE E-3
       ST. CROIX RIVER STUDY
BENTHIC POPULATION PER SQUARE METER

ORGANISMS
EPHEMEROPTER (MAYFLIES)
TRICHOPTERA (CADDISFLIES)
NEUROPTERA (ALDERFLY)
ODONATA (DRAGONFLY)
(DAMSELFLY)
DIPTERA
TENDIPEDIDAE (MIDGE FLY)
SIMULIDAE (BLACK FLY)
COLEOPTERA (BEETLES)
ELMIDAE
HALIPLIDAE
GASTROPODA (SNAILS)
HYDROBIIDAE
PLANORBIDAE
LYMNAEIDAE
VIVIPARIDAE
ANCYLIDAE
PELECYPODA (CLAM)
OLIGOCHAETA (WORM)
NEMATODA (ROUNDWORM)
TRICLADIDA (PLANARIAN)
ISOPODA (SOWBUG)
AMPHIPODA (SCUD)
HIRUDINEA (LEECH)
PORIFERA (SPONGE)
HYDROZOA (HYDRA) .
#
TOTAL NUMBER
TOTAL KINDS
STATIONS
CONTROL

SCB11
56
364
28
252

8988

56
56




448

980
364
112
84

1,876



13,664
13
WET
STORAGE
SCB15M


28


448









112
112


420
168


4,
1,288
6
DOWNSTREAM FROM
GEORGIA-PACIFIC MILL
SCB16C
168
2,744



168
84




70
42


28
154


70
70
84
42
14
14
3,752
14
SCB16U
























0
0
SCB18C





1008










2,380
140






3,528
3
SCB19U



14

560




490

518


420
560


56
126
14


2,758
9
        E-9

-------
                                TABLE 3-U

                            ST. GROIX RIVER
                       BOTTOM ORGANISMS (BENTHOS)
                              August 1972
                                                   Benthos Biological
                          No. of Kinds of            Assessment of
Control Stations          Bottom Organisms            Water Quality

  River
    SCB10                      15                         Clean
    SCB11       .               19                         Clean
    MC10                       12                         Clean
Wet Storage Stations

  River
    SCB13U                      9                         Clean
    SCB13C                     111                         Clean
                                 E-10

-------
pulp logs covering the bottom necessitated the use of a scuba diver



to guide the dredge to soft bottom areas comparable to those found



at SCB12.  Based on the reduction in benthos diversity, the wet



storage area is considered moderately degraded.  (See Table E^?.)



    Downstream from the Georgia-Pacific Corporation's mill, three



kinds of water quality can be observed as one moves laterally across



the river.  The U. S. side is toxic and grossly polluted,  midstream



exhibits moderate degradation, and the Canadian side compares to the



control stations.  These conditions exist at transects SCB16 and



persist down to transect SCB17.  Apparently lateral mixing occurs



between transects SCB17 and SCB18 because the river exhibits a pau-



city of organisms on the Canadian side and mid-stream.  The U. S.



side shows signs of recovery, but the entire area may be defined as



moderately polluted.  (See Table E-6.)



    At transect SCB19, the river is still moderately polluted, but



showing a recovery in water quality from transect SCB18.  Station



SCB19U indicates a better quality of water on the U. S. side of the



river, but this improvement may be attributed to dilution waters from



U. S. tributaries—Stoney Brook, Conic Stream and Magurrewock Stream.



    The most adverse benthic conditions occurred on the U. S. side



of the river.  At station SCB16U which is approximately 700 feet



downstream from Georgia-Pacific Corporation's main discharge, gray



colored biological slimes which included the filamentous bacterium



Sphaerotilus covered the bottom.  Paper waste sludge dredged at this



station was devoid of benthos.            -  "



 (  At station SCB17U sludge worms, pollution tolerant organisms,  were



tike only invertebrates dwelling in the gray sludge covering the bottom.





                                    E-ll

-------
                                TABLE E-5

                            ST. CROIX RIVER
                       BOTTOM ORGANISMS (BENTHOS)
                              August 1972
                                                  Benthos Biological
                         No. of Kinds of            Assessment of
Control Station          Bottom Organisms           Water Quality

  Ponded
    SCB12                      17                      Clean
Wet Storage Stations

  Ponded
    SCBlliU                      U                  Moderate Pollution
    SCBliiM                      7                      "       "
    SCBlUC                      7                      "       "
    SCB15U                      7                      "       "
    SCB15M                      6                      "       "
    SCB1$C                      7                      "       "
                                  E-12

-------
                                TABLE E-6

                            ST. GROIX RIVER
                       BOTTOM ORGANISMS (BENTHOS)
                              August 1972
Control Stations

  River
    SCB10
    SCB11
    MCB10
No. of Kinds of
Bottom Organisms
      19
      12
Benthos Biological
  Assessment of
  Water Quality
      Clean
      Clean
      Clean
Downstream of Georgia-Pacific Mill
  River
    SCB16U
    SCB16M
    SCB16C
    SCB17U
    SCB17M
    SCB17C
    SCB18U
    SCB18M
    SCB18C
    SCB19U
    SCB19M
    SCB19C
       0
       6
      Hi
       1
       7
      12
       7
       3
       3
       9
       U
   Toxic
   Moderate
   Clean
   Polluted
   Moderate
   Clean
   Moderate
   Polluted
   Polluted
   Moderate
   Moderate
   Moderate
Pollution


Pollution

Pollution
Pollution
Pollution
Pollution
                                 E-13

-------
Long strands of Sphaerotilus and other slimes were attached to  a fallen



tree at this station and streaming in the current.  Living in these



smelly masses of slime were sludge worms (tubificidae)  and the  pollu-



tion tolerant specie of midge larvae (Tendipedidae) commonly known



as the bloodworm (Tendipes sp).



    Strands of gray colored slimes were found clinging  to aquatic



vegetation at SCB18U.



    Clean water invertebrates were found on the Canadian side of the



river at station SCB16C and SCB17C.  Twelve and lU kinds of bottom



organisms, including caddisfly and mayfly larvae were found at  the



respective stations.  The substratum did not contain any sludge from



the paper making processes.  The diversity of benthos at these  stations



was typical of that at the control stations.
                                    K-14

-------
APPENDIX  F

-------
 REPORT OF SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION
   ST. CROIX RIVER, WOODLAND, ME.
               For
  Environmental Protection Agency
  Division Surveillance & Analysis
     New England Regional Lab
          Needham, Mass.
               By
 Geophysical Survey Systems, Inc.
        16 Republic Road
North Billerica, Massachusetts 01862
         File No. 0107
         September 1972
            E-l

-------
             REPORT OF SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION
               ST. CROIX RIVER, WOODLAND, ME.

                            For
               Environmental Protection Agency
               Division Surveillance & Analysis
                  New England Regional Lab
                       Needham, Mass.
SCOPE

This report covers electromagnetic subsurface investigations per-

formed by Geophysical Survey Systems, Inc. to determine character-

ization of the log ponding area of the St. Croix River at Woodland,

Maine.  The general purpose is to locate the areas of pulp wood

log deposits on the lake bottom and to determine the quantities

of logs where possible.



Field Work

The field work on this project was performed on September 17, 18

and 19, 1972 on the Woodland Pond Section of the St. Croix River,

Woodland, Maine.  The maps of the survey lines are shown in
       »
Figures 1 and 2.  The survey lines (transects) are lettered

alphabetically from point to point as run in the field.  The
                                                        *
ground truth marks are numbered consecutively, also, as run in

                            F-2

-------
Woodland Junction
             WOODLAND
              FIGURE Fl

-------
Woodland Junction
             WOODLAND
             FIGURE  F2

-------
the field.  The ground truth locations are also plotted on the

maps in Figures 1 and 2.



All the data on this survey was collected utilizing the Geophysical

Survey System's Electromagnetic Subsurface Profiling (ESP) System.

A brief description of this system is contained in Appendix A.



The first day of operation in the field was utilized in setting

up the equipment and making experimental scans.  The data collected

from these scans was played back at the site and was used to direct

a diver in bottom investigations.  This information was used to

determine the characteristic signature of various bottom conditions,



The field operations on the second day were cancelled due to

heavy rain and high wind conditions.



All the transect lines shown in Figures 1 and 2 were surveyed on

the third day of field operations.  The transects were run between

the lettered points shown in Figures 1 and 2.  These were marked

on the site by anchored floats.  As the survey lines were being

scanned, additional marker floats were layed out at 100 ft.
                 *                   ^
intervals.  These 100 ft. interval points were recorded in the data

                            F-3

-------
as the antenna passed each marker float.  At various points along


the transect lines visual observations of the bottom were made


by divers.  These points were marked with anchored buoys and their


locations were recorded in the data as the antenna passed these


points.  The complete logs of these diver observations are con-


tained in Appendix B.





A core sample was collected from the pond bottom and returned '»o


the GSS laboratory for electromagnetic analysis.  This sample


was tagged and identified as Number 30124.
RESULTS


General Background


As noted in the report of diver observations enclosed in Appendix


B, wherever EPA divers conducted operations on Woodland Pond,


sunken logs lying on the bottom were encountered.  The logs


varied in diameter from approximately 3 inches to 24 inches.
              ,     <•

There was no uniformity in character of the logs layered on the


bottom.  The logs lay in an assorted jumble from the phase of


upright through horizontal.  The spaces between the logs varied

                                                   1 1
from a few inches to large gaps of up to 8 ft.  Thevgaps or spaces



                           F-4

-------
between the logs were laden with bark and woody debris inter-

spersed with silt.  Overlying this logging debris was a fine

floe which was easily disturbed and resuspended.  The deposit

thicknesses discussed in the survey results do not differentiate

the logs from the logging debris.  Rather, the deposits are

treated as a composite material.
Laboratory Tests

The core sample taken from the lake bottom was tested in the

laboratory in the standard coaxial tube test used by GSS to


classify materials.  Insertion loss measurements show this

material to have an attenuation characteristic of 55.9db per


meter, which is extremely high.  System penetration into this

material will be negligible.  Based on the results of this test

it is safe to say that the multiple interfaces shown in the ESP

data all occur above this material in the lake bottom and show

the thickness of logs and silt deposits.  The data recorded in

the insertion loss test is included in Appendix C.




Field Data


The response of the ESP system to the conditions in Woodland
               *                  t
                *                   -V
Pond was very good.  Strong reflections from the bottom were

                             F-5

-------
recorded throughout this site.  The maximum depth of operation



was 29 ft.  This was limited only by the time base setting of



the equipment.  The only problem experienced with the equipment



was an instrumentation noise band recorded at a depth of 20



feet.  This is only a problem when the depth to the bottom is



coincident with this noise band.  In some cases information



can be seen within-this noise band but it is extremely difficult



to make a meaningful analysis of this data.








The ESP system performed well in distinguishing between various



characteristics of bottom conditions.  Figures 3 through 8 are



examples of the data collected from different areas.  Note the



difference in bottom signature between areas where the logs .are



flat and stratified and those where the logs are upright and



jumbled.  Also note the difference in the data caused by the



thickness of the log deposits.






                ,

Interpretation of the data for each line was performed to deter-



mine tfce thickness of the log deposits and the general character
        <


of the deposits.  The deposits were generally classified into



two categories: flat and upright.  For the most part, the deposits
                            F-6

-------
R
w
P
1
                                     WATER SURFACE
     0-

        -' I
                      "LAKE BOTTOM
    10	
                  ;..    r- .v ;   ;.:- ,:.;; DEPOSIT CHARACTER -
         '•'••'• 'y:.T'':'--V..'  '*'''?' -.*••. :--^'    Generally flat and
         • iV. -i T J ', ^ ••.'i'.'." ' l '  « '  ;•»• i-  •  •; .           . _.  ,
            '

«,'.
                                               . _.  ,
                                         stratified
                                    -,}«. DEPOSIT THICKNESS -
                                            f nn#.
                                            r°OC
                              FIGURE  F3

-------
                                  WATER SURFACE
H
W
W
3C
H
P*
W
Q
DEPOSIT CHARACTER -
  Jumbled and generally

  upright deposits.
DEPOSIT THICKNESS -
  2 feet
                            ^^^^^;'l^'^^l8>ipv^
                              v";.?A2./*24.- A-1-: '^/Li.j/v.V-.X.t'^vA .^V•v.v-iiL: -XTV.vM-> M... ..••.•)'«.
        gl.-'»***». JW, , .•,•«•!',•:

       M^fe^r

       fliMr r-:e.r;. a
     jsm.,11 : ;.i:i|vJff 2",-••"/. a, ,;
  .ic	»fi^ !>.. * *(fl*^;. -Jt
  1J	CSiP £,'  • <,j;• ^v« '.. .v • >j
                                FIGURE F4

-------
                                  WATER SURFACE
             LAKE BOTTOM  .
         «.'--!c.:.
1'.   ?/,;•. 'y,- '  »'  •'  •  'i-t   •"' v ' *'V' ''•* - ' ,»f'
• "-, ''' i'1- "f «'.•*•' '*«.'• ," ,'f  'P"' i'''.'-'^ •' ;<( ' J  'n
.>^'/>^'^'•»•''v
               "
Flat and  stratified T
deposits              (t1
     .-., .   .. 	  -..--...---.--.  ..       .
^ tf "r'^'il-llvVil/*,'''••'.. 'K-vi"ijiv „ "^.t^/^',11!',;.'1^' ;\r        n,

fe^^
                        FIGURE  F5

-------
x]
g
i
                                               WATER SURFACE

                                                   W'   i  . •••;• ,i •,"•• > MI -,/.'• •, .• ,
                                                   "MU

                                                   Many  upright logs
                                                DEPOSIT  THICKNESS -
                                                   3 feet  to 4 feet
                                                GROUND TRUTH -
A
• A
Tt
                                                   Logs  3 to 4 deep,  lying'*
                                                   in a  jumble.  Coverage  "
                                                   fairly dense, with few  '
                                                   gaps  between logs.      •
                                             ' '''T^TTi »*'^Yr,'"*|Wf j'^^r^w ••'••* -»H ^-"^wfr^M^
                                      FIGURE  F6

-------
                                           WATER SURFACE
w^ •»
Ed
           '5iVa;.,  -. 4.    - *-.-.:   '•  ••-   •«!.;!
                       ^ •  •   -v- .; .yv.'.  >••-  .: ;r^-'.r  ^^i^-,1^
                       T;  , ' .•;  •.'/.••:»  'r'""^".:1"-.-  ;M ;.,« j, ••: « >,'/.»/•» v^». ., / «  '..^i

                            :v^
                         "         '                    "  "
                                                     ' -   '« • " f
                       ^V*vV:'y»'°-.^'.''-i-4 DEPOSIT  CHARACTER  -     j;.
                       • ' •»•*—v.' n ft"	>: •1'';'-i '!•     Generally  flat,  some_!
                                      '
                            -.    -.r '/i j';, «.
                       ..-'".-:---.^^-^.,^.'^
    upright
DEPOSIT THICKNESS -
t;

tt
                        IVl^vV^,t^t''l>^v;,^
-------
                                                    WATER SURFACE
                                                                             m*.-.
                                      LAKE BOTTOM
                     .*».!
"•^     .        • ' «  i  j., , „ In  ^Wi'Ziai *' ,i,  I  A    ,i*.  v«i-»"fi--."nT-'W••••• j.
    . ,<• ,'• lay. «'v.       .i*'.," ,/4- M. » 'Jfijjii!?, ... • <"  ./ •,. '!*•    • W . »  .11.^^^^^^^^^^^
  »  Jl-   ^*J"^  u •    "    a±   * _i«L-    ^Stf "^jtf'rJt*-  i* '  *lv / •      i !'• • j^











 .••m •%••»—~-	-n-vv^-	<-^f~f~-t.—. -jr-r.- •-. — Mf-r-j-^rj-,— ..j^n-iT.*-!^' 4,-4 - -rj-;.-. - jf—lrV.TJl.i.Jl.iJ-,- ../,«.--. -- -i - --...-. .J  - .-

  r      .    ..«.,.•.«. <.•. .  *  .•  .  .   ""S-./i     ...     /   ,T


10-
                   . -.

               •••' '•'•''  '• '^ '.. i' i
                    1
                           ''    '   i  ••''>t'!
                             -
                                             i!^Vv"<-.t-<:»jV)y" '.';'.:.''t '•' ••''..!>'•-. DEPOSIT ' CHARACTER -' Fiat
    r '••  »  » ••' ' *'• .<'*• J'r . 4.v .'«.*.' ••; '^A .....4 M • .  ;,;• V'^-,.. A. * /^S*?V' '"''^ : •'•'. SM'tyVl '-'',.. '"'•  -.; ;"••'  .',it£i:<.     ,/'

    ay " V, ^ftfflti&gZ&fg&SiZV
                                                                         THICKNESS  -  1 Foot ',

                                                             ^ GROUND TRUTH -             k<1

                                                                    Logs lying flat on the ^

                                                                    bottom one layer deep, £\
                                              FIGURE  F8

-------
                                                                                                                                            WATER    SURFACE
0 + 0 0,
                                                      1+00
                                        - -t^-,- -Nvy-Ji (/,,mtv.n~it>^vf»f -.^.j, ,»,-.••
                                           '           i  ' *. '  ~~       '
2+00


                                                                                               £v>d^i^.>-:^;k5*to
                                                                                               l**l4*4^*^^W's£vivJ*/v\^iife^
                                                          i*'Pf^PP>/P7*?^
                                                          .!'"/-%irVs»';i''r^;H'>/i;?'>''  ,  'i't' .. .   >1fi" /A>' ;-<, Jii'tji 1, jK •, '.. v,) i'.'l'..^,,
-------
appeared to be generally flat.  For this reason, notations will



be made only for areas where the logs appear to be upright and



jumbled and all other areas should be considered generally flat.



The following is a summary of the conditions recorded for each



of the scan lines.  A complete point to point tabulation of the



interpretation for the scan lines is contained in Appendix D.
TRANSECT A - B




Data on this line was recorded while enroute to Point B.  The




line was run along the channel and the depths in this area are




in the order of 30 feet.  The bottom reflection appears too




close to the end of the equipment time base to show all the




sub-bottom information.
TRANSECT B - C



Data was taken on this line for 1100 linear feet.  Some of the




thickest log deposits were observed on this line.  The general



character of the deposits was flat except that some indication




of upright logs was observed between Station 7+80 and 8+60.
                             F-7

-------
The summary of deposit thicknesses is:
     Thicknesses less than 1 ft.  -   None
     Thicknesses 1 ft. to 2 ft.   -   37%
     Thicknesses 2 ft. to 3 ft.   -   34%
     Thicknesses 3 ft. to 4 ft.   »   25%
     Thicknesses 4 ft. to 5 ft.   -   4%

The ESP data from this line is enclosed in this report as
Figure 9.
TRANSECT C - D
The length of this line is 2100 linear feet including approximately
a 500 foot width of channel which was beyond the depth range of
the system.  The deposits in this line can be generally character-
ized as flat.  Evidence of upright and jumbled deposits appear
between stations 7+60 and 9+00, and stations 15+00 and 18+50.
What appears ,to be a log pile about 5 ft. high is observed at
Station 3+95.  A summary of the observed bottom conditions is:
    •
     Deposits less than 1 ft. -  7%
     Deposit thicknesses 1 ft. to 2 ft. - 20%
     -Deposit thicknesses 2 ft. to 3 ft. - 44%

                             F-8

-------
     Deposit thicknesses 3 ft. to 4 ft. - None



     Deposit thicknesses 4 ft. to 5 ft. - 1%
TRANSECT D - E




This line is 2300 linear feet long.  The character of the log




deposits in this line is generally flat except that evidence




of upright logs was noted between Stat-ons 4+00 and 5+00.  What




could be logs trapped by stumps is observed at Station 2+90.




A log filled depression is observed between station 20+00 and




21+00.  A summary of the deposits in this line is:






     Deposits less than 1 ft. thi,ck - 36%




     Deposit thicknesses 1 ft. to 2 ft. - 59%




     Deposit thicknesses 2 ft. to 3 ft. - 5%




     Deposit thicknesses 3 ft. to 4 ft. - None




     Deposit thicknesses 4 ft. to 5 ft. - None








TRANSECT E - F




The length of this line is 1600 linear feet.  It was run approx-




imately parallel to Transect D-E except closer to the logging boom,
                            F-9

-------
The same general characterization comments apply.  A summary of



the deposits is:




     Deposit thicknesses less than 1 ft. - 23%



     Deposit thicknesses 1 ft. to 2 ft. - 54%



     Deposit thicknesses 2 ft. to 3 ft. - 23%



     Deposit thicknesses 3 ft. to 4 ft. - None



     Deposit thicknesses 4 ft. to 5 ft- - None
TRANSECT F - G



This is a survey line 670 linear feet long which runs from the



opening in the logging boom to point G.  The general characteristics



of the deposits in this line were flat.  No differences from this



character were observed.  A summary of the deposits is:





     Deposits less than 1 ft. thick - None



     Deposit thicknesses 1 ft. to 2 ft. - 66%
                   V


     Deposit thicknesses 2 ft. to 3 ft. - 24%



     peposit thicknesses 3 ft. to 4 ft. - 10%
       «


     Deposit thicknesses 4 ft. to 5 ft. - None
                             F-10

-------
TRANSECT G - H




The length of this line was 400 linear feet.  The general character




of the deposit was flat.  Approximately 70% of this line was in




the noise band and no meaningful information could be extracted.




Deposits of two to three feet in thickness make up 17% of this




line.
TRANSECT H - I




This line length is 950 linear feet.  The general character of




the deposits is flat except that upright indications are shown




from station 6+90 to 9+55.  A summary of the deposits is:






     Deposit thicknesses less than 1 ft. - None




     Deposit thicknesses 1 ft. to 2 ft. - 68%




     Deposit thicknesses 2 ft. to 3 ft. - 32% - Estimated






It should be noted that approximately 310 feet of this line was




within the instrumentation noise band.  The thickness here appears




to be 2 to 3 ft. but was hard to define.  It makes up the 32%




estimated quantity in the summary.
                             F-ll

-------
TRANSECT I - J

The length of this line is 780 linear feet.  The same general

comments as in the H-I transect apply.  A summary of the deposit

thickness is:

     Deposits less than 1 ft. thick - 17%

     Deposits 1 to 2 ft. thick - 38%

     Deposits 2 to 3 ft. thick - 45%

     Deposits 3 to 4 ft. thick - None

     Deposits 4 to 5 ft. thick - None



Figure 9 is a reproduction of the data from the complete scan

line of B to C.  General points of interest are noted such

as the 100 ft. station marks, locations of diver ground truth

information, diver ground truth reports, and the interpreted

location of the actual lake bottom.
CONCLUSIONS

The ESP data collected supports the diver observations of the

extensive deposits of logs on the bottom of Woodland Pond.  The

interpretations of the data collected from Point B through to
                                                  t
Point J indicates that log deposits ranging in thickness from

1 to 3 ft. make up 80% of the lake bottom along these lines.


                             F-12

-------
APPENDIX F-A
    F-13

-------
                          APPENDIX F-A
INTRODUCTION

Geophysical Survey Systems, Inc., has developed an impulse radar

system that makes shallow subsurface investigations.  The tech-

nique is known as Electromagnetic Subsurface Profiling (ESP),

and is the electrical analog of seismic sub-bottom profiling

techniques used in marine geology.  The system is capable of

detecting and graphically displaying subsurface interfaces to

depths of as much as 50 feet.


Broadband, time-limited pulses of electromagnetic energy are

continuously radiated into the earth from a special antenna .

moving along the surface.  The system receives reflections of

these pulses from interfaces between materials that have different

electrical properties.  This data is stored on magnetic tape and

is printed out graphically after an area has been scanned.  The
                       *.
printout displays a close approximation to the interfaces one
     %
would see in the vertical wall of a trench dug along the corres-

ponding scan line.  The printout is produced by printing high
                                                    *
signal levels as black and no signal as white.  Intermediate
     «
signals are in the gray range.

                            F-14

-------
In practice,  scans are made by slowly driving a small truck or

boat containing the impulse radar system over the area of

interest.   A  block diagram of the system is shown in Figure Al.

A sled-mounted antenna is towed behind the survey vehicle.   The

antenna can also be handpulled over an area as much as 100  feet

from the vehicle or towed behind an all-terrain vehicle in  areas

where the  standard vehicle is unsuitable.   Data may be printed

out in the field for immediate interpretation or sent back  to

the laboratory for computer processing and data enhancement.



The impulse radar system has been used successfully to locate ice

wedges in  permafrost,  determine the geologic structure of several

deposits of unconsolidated material, map bottom topography  through

ice on fresh-water lakes, measure fresh-water and sea-ice thickness,
        /
locate buried objects  such as pipes, tunnels, barrels, and  synthetic

foam,  and  profile the  bedrock surface buried beneath unconsolidated

materials.



EXPLANATION OF IMPULSE RADAR THEORY

Impulse propagation through naturally-occurring media, is a  com-

plicated phenomenon.   Physical and chemical properties of a medium

affect the dielectric  constant and conductivity.  These parameters


                           F-15

-------
in turn influence impulse shape and propagation.  The dielectric

constant determines the velocity at which the impulse travels

through the medium.  If the velocity and time of travel are known,

the thickness of the material can be determined.
The impulse radar system emits a pulse that is approximately

Gaussian in shap.e (see Figure A2).  It is possible to express

this time domain impulse through its fourier transform as a

frequency spectrum of components (Ref. 1, 2 and 3).  The

reflection of each of the spectral components and hence the

impulse is determined by the dielectric constant and conductivity

of the medium from which it is reflected.  This is because the

reflected pulse must satisfy the boundary conditions at each

interface.  These boundary conditions are derived from Maxwell's

equations (ReJE. 4).  If the impulse passes through multiple media

it is partially reflected and partially transmitted at each

interface (see Figure A3).  It is the reflected pulse that the
                  i
radar system developed by Geophysical Survey Systems, Inc. will

detect, analyze and record.
                            F-16

-------
                                      Recorder
                                                                   Receiver
          Battery
                                     Fast  Switch
                                       Transmitted Pulse
                                                 Soil and/or
                                                 Rock Strata
Transmit-
Receive
Selector
                                                                I   Antenna  |
            Reflected
            Pulse
            Signals
                                                               Obstacle
FIGURE FA I   Block Diagram of Impulse
           Radar System

-------
r
01
CO
CM
O
I
1
d
1
N

-------
                                     VOLTS
         Ground  Surface
                                                Top Soil

                                 /.^^^^^^r I f i*^^**f t ^^^^^**i^C*
                                                Bedrock
                                                 V °U
                           z  and t
LEGEND
E^  =  Incident Pulse  (Pulse Transmitted by Radar)
Er  =  Reflected Pulse From Interface  (Ground Surface)
Et  =  Transmitted Pulse Into Ground
 z  =  Distance
 t  =  Time
 e  =  Dielectric Constant
 0  =*  Conductivity
              FIGURE  FA3   Multiple Media

-------
                      REFERENCES CITED
1.   Redheffer, R.M.; Sokolnikoff, I.S.; Mathematics of Physics
     and Modern Engineering, pp 175 - 195, McQraw-Hill, Inc. 1958
2.   IBID; Redheffer, R.M.; pp 482 - 488.
3.   Adler, Richard B.; Chu, LanJen; Fano, Robert M.; Electro-
     magnetic Energy Transmission and Radiation, pp 6 - 24,
     John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 1960.
4.   IBID; Adler, Richard B.; pp 189 - 194.
                            F-17

-------
APPENDIX F-B
      F-18

-------
                ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
                Division of Surveillance and Analysis
                         2UO Highland Avenue
                Needham Heights, Massachusetts   0219**

                         September 22, 1972
Geophysical Survey Systems, Inc.
16 Republic Road
North Billerica, Massachusetts   01862

Attention:  Mr. Walter Harrington

Gentlemen:

     Enclosed is the ground truth information requested by GSS  for
the interpretation of ESP data recorded for the Woodland Pond
section of the St. Croix River, Woodland, Maine.   The maps of the
survey lines I (the run from north to south) and  II (the return
run from south to north) are fairly good representations of  those
run in the field.  These will have to serve as temporary lines
until such time as an aerial composite map  can be put together  and
the survey lines more accurately mapped.

     Included are blank maps of the study area.  Suggestions and
changes relative to identifying transects and their locations are
velcome.  If any problems or discrepancies  arise  or if  I can be
of further assistance, do not hesitate to contact me.

FOR THE REGIONAL ADMINISTRATOR:

                                Sincerely yours,
                                Peter M.  Nolan
                                Aquatic Biologist
Enclosure(s)
                         F-19

-------
                          GROUND TRUTHS





General Information



     Wherever EPA divers conducted operations on Woodland Pond, sunken



logs lying on the bottom were encountered.  The logs varied in



diameter from approximately 3 to 2k inches.  A stick of pulpwood



averages k feet in length.  Generally, the pond from the channel east



was more densely laden with logs.  There was no uniformity in character



of the logs layered on the bottom.  The logs lay in an assorted jumble



from upright to horizontal.  The spaces between the logs varied from



a few inches to large gaps of up to eight feet.  The gaps or spaces



between the logs were laden with bark and woody debris interspersed



with silt.  Depending on location, this could be as much as 2k inches



or as little as 1 inch.  This debris was observed to be heaviest in



the downstream end of the study area.  Overlying this logging debris



was a fine floe which was easily disturbed and resuspended.



     The observations stated for ground truth points are considered



by us to be a fair representation of the area in the general vicinity



of the point.



     The layering of logs referred to in this report indicates the



numbers of logs piled on one another re(2 to 3 layers).  Estimates of



depths in feet of log related deposits was not considered reliable.



For example, depending on the size of the logs and configuration on the



bottom, 2 layers of logs could be k to 5 feet deep and conversely k



layers could be only 2 to 3 feet deep, etc.



     The survey lines (transects) are lettered alphabetically from point



to point as run in the field.  The ground truth marks are numbered



consecutively also as run in the field.
                          F-20

-------
Transect A to B
     Although no diving was done along this transect, we were
sufficiently close to shore to observe at visible depths the pre-
sence of sunken logs.  My estimate is that the logs were layered from
1 to 3 deep for most of this survey line.  The logs were positioned on
the bottom in various configurations from upright to horizontal.
Transect B to C
     Ground Truth Point 1 - Logs layered 1 to 2 deep,  some laying
horizontal and others layered or were leaning against  these.  There
were some gaps between the logs of approximately k to  5 feet.  The
gaps are filled in with bark, wood fragments, a light  floe and silt
to a depth of approximately 2 to 6 inches.
     Ground Truth Point 2 - Logs generally layered from 1 to 2 deep
with some logs layered up to U deep.  Logs were fairly uniformly
distributed on the bottom.  The substrate was composed of bark, wood
fragments, silt, etc. to depths of 6 to 12 inches.
     Ground Truth Point 3 - Logs layered 2 to 3 thick with bark, wood
fragments and silt comprising the substrate.  Other observations are
similar to the above.
Transect C to D
     Ground Truth Point U - Considerable logs sunk at visible depths
near the shore with logs layered 3 to h deep, lying in a Jumble on
the bottom.  Coverage is fairly dense with few gaps between logs.
     Ground Truth Points 5 and 6 - Bottom visibility was 6 inches
or less at these points due to log recovery operations being conducted
            4                      "•
by GP.  However, diver verification of the presence of logs was made
                           F-21

-------
faced rocks up to 8 feet across.  Logs were piled on top of the rocks



usually not exceeding 2 layers.



     East side £ of line distance from the Canadian shore, logs



covered the bottom in every direction with fewer in the vicinity of



the channel.  Bottom coverage by logs was fairly dense with logs



layered from 1 to 5 deep.  The logs of largest diameter were observed



to be on the bottom of the piles with the smaller sticks on top.



The logs on the bottom varied from upright, to flat on the bottom.



Bark, wood fragments and debris covered the bottom to depths up to



18 inches deep.  Some logs were buried beneath the substrate.  Near



the shore in some locations more stumps were noticed and the logs



were 1 deep.  One pile of logs was observed to be about 6 to 8 feet



high.



     Relative numbers of logs for 100 feet in 3 different directions



for this area are:



          From point 0 to northeast 330 logs and 279 logs



          From point 0 due south 150 logs



          From point 0 west to channel 78 logs



Transect E to F



     Ground truth from point E to the intersection of the two large
                 y


logging booms.



     This line was surveyed on August 17, 1972, for verification of



the presence of logs.  3 to k layers of logs were observed to be



fairly uniformly covering the bottom along this line.  The bark, wood



debris, etc. was noted to be 6 to 12 inches deep.



Transect F to G



     No truth.
                          F-22

-------
by feeling on the bottom.  At these points, logs are estimated to be


layered 2 to 3 deep with variable gaps up to 5 feet separating some


of the logs.  Bottom materials, such as bark, wood fragments,  floe


and silt are estimated to be about 2 to 12 inches.  Some of this area


is channel.


     Ground Truth 7 - Logs are less dense, 1 to 2 layers with  some


lying horizontal and others laying or leaning against these.  Some


logs protruding out of the water closer to shore.


Transect D to E


     Although ground truth marks per se are not given along this


transect, we conducted a good deal of diving activity along this line


and have a good deal of ground truth available for it.


     On the west side t» of line distance from the American shore, the


bottom was observed to have a good deal of stumps and trees lopped


off at 6 feet.  Many of these stumps were trapping logs and causing


piles to be created, accumulations of which reached 5 layers.   The logs


are not as dense as on the east side with gaps with no logs extending


for up to 8 feet.  Typically, the logs are layered 2 to k deep.  The


substrate encountered typically was comprised of bark, wood fragments


interspersed with silt and floe.


     Lines which divers swam on compass bearings for 100 feet  indicate


relative numbers of logs over which the diver passed.


     From point zero due east 183 logs and 1?8 logs were counted.


     From point zero due west 220 logs were counted.


     At mid-stream the water was up to 25 to 30 feet deep.  Exposed
             ,

portions of the channel indicated the presence of ledge and broad
                         F-23

-------
 faced rocks up to  8 feet across.  Logs were piled on top of the


 rocks usually not  exceeding 2  layers.


      East side £ of line distance from the Canadian shore, U logs


 covered the bottom in  every direction with fewer in the vicinity of


 the  channel.  Bottom coverage  by logs was fairly dense with logs


 layered from 1 to  5 deep.  The logs of largest diameter were observed


 to be on the bottom of the piles with the smaller sticks on top.


 The  logs on the bottom varied  from upright to flat on the bottom.


 Bark, wood' fragments and debris covered the bottom to depths up to


 18 inches deep. Some  logs were buried beneath the substrate.  Near


 shore in some locations more stumps were noticed and the logs were


 1 deep.  One pile  of logs was  observed to be about 6 to 8 feet high.


      Relative numbers  of logs  for 100 feet in 3 different directions

ijr '
 for  this area are:


      From point 0  to northeast 330 logs and 279 logs.


      From point 0  due  south 150 logs.


      From point 0  west to channel 78 logs.


 Transect E to F


      Ground truth  from point E to the intersection of the two large


 logging booms.


      This line was surveyed on August 17, 1972, for verification


 of the presence of logs.  3 to k layers of logs were observed to


 be fairly uniformly covering the bottom along this line.  The bark,


 wood debris, etc.  was  noted to be 6 to 12 inches deep.


 Transect F to G


      No truth.
                         F-24

-------
Transect G to H



     Truth Point 8 - Logs are present on the pond bottom in densities



similar to those for areas on the east side of Woodland Pond.  These



vary from approximately 2 to h layers with fairly uniform bottom



coverage.  Bark, wood fragments and woody debris are present to depths



of 18 inches.



     Truth Point 9 - Similar to above.



     Truth Point 10 - Presence of logs verified average 2 to h layers



with some spots having logs 5 to 6 layers deep.  Logs are lying on the



bottom in a jumble upright to horizontal.  Typical coverage for 100



feet (the number of logs over which the diver passes) was approximately



130 logs.  A divers count for an area estimated to be 10 square feet



was 25 logs.  These logs would be wholly or partially in this area.



     Bark, woody debris and floe was deeper here than in areas previously



noted.  A diver could put his arm to shoulder depth (2k or more inches)



in this area and not feel hard bottom.  Groping beneath this debris



revealed the presence of buried logs.



     Truth Point 11 - The logs were less dense, approximately 1 layer



deep with 2 layers the maximum depth.  The logs were lying flat on the



bottom.  Submerged vegetation was noted to be more abundant.
                        F-25

-------
APPENDIX F-C
   F-26

-------
 I
to

-------
APPENDIX P-D
   F-28

-------
TRANSECT B - C
station
0400 to 1+60
1+60 to 2+40
    to 4+90
4+90 to 5+40
5+40 to 7+40
7-»40 to 7+90
7+80 to 6+$0

8+60 to 11+00
Deposit
Thickness
X1
Water
Depth
2'-3'
3f-4f
4'-5'
3'-4'

2'-3'
                  14 '-15'
                  17'-29+
12 '-15'
12 '
12 '-
15f-17'
Comments
            Gap at 0+80
            2+90 to 4+50
            Ground Truth #1
            Steep Channel
Ground Truth #2
Some Upright
9+00 to 9+50 log
filled depression
After 11+00 bottom
is difficult to define.
Ground Truth #3
                           F-29

-------
TRANSECT C
Station

0+00  to  Q+70
           i

0+70  to  H0p

1+00  to  l+2ty

1+20  to  2+14

2+15  to  fc+$0

2+90  to  3+7$

3+75  to  5+00



5+00  to  7+60

7+60  to  9+00

-9+00  to  1J5+00

15+00 to IMQ

16+20 to ?.8+5Q
             .1


18+50 tp 19+2Q

19+20 to ^l-fOQ
Deposit
Thickness
2f-3'
l',2'
2'~3'
X'-2'
<1
l'-2f
2'-3'
2'
2f-3'
-
lf-2f
2'-3'

-------
TRANSECT D - E
Station

0+00 to 1+00
1+00 to 1+50
1+50 to 2+00
Deposit
Thickness
<1-
l'-2'

-------
TRANSECT E - F
Station
0+00 to 1+60
1+60 to 4+60
4+60 to 5+40
5+40 to 9+00
9+00 to 13+20
13+20 to 14+00
14+00 to 16+00
Deposit
Thickness
l'-2f
2'-3'
Water
Depth
6-20
18-23
Comments

1+70 to
l'-2f
                   ''
2'-3
18-20



17-29+



14-18



17-18




16-19
                                            filled depression
                          Channel/Tree 8+25




                          Some Upright Logs
TRANSECT F - G
0+00 to 1+60




1+60 to 4+50
4+50 to 5+20
5+20 to 6+70
2'-3'



It.2'




3'-4'
16I-20f




20f
                            F-32

-------
TRANSECT G - H
Station
0+00 to 1+30
1+30 to 3+30
3+30 to 4+00
Deposit
Thickness
2'-3!
               Water
               Depth

               18 '-23'
               16 '-20'
                          Comments
                          Ground Truth #8
                          Data in Noise Band

                          Ground Truth #9
TRANSECT H - I
0+00 to 3+10
3+10 to 6+90

6+90 to 9+55
                   I _0 I
2'-3
 I Ol
lf-2
1'
               21
               13t-21I
                          Data in Noise Band
               15'-18'    Upright Logs
TRANSECT I - J
0+00 to 3+55
3+55 to 6+45
6+45 to 7+75
2'-3
               6'-14'


               6'-9'
                          Ground Truth #10

                          Many flat - Mostly
                          about 2'

                          Some Flat
                          Ground Truth #11
                           F-33

-------
APPENDIX  G

-------
                       ST. CROIX RIVER STUDY
                            AUGUST 1972
                           DIVING REPORT
                     WOODLAND LAKE & MILL POND
                          WOODLAND, MAINE
     During the period of August 16 - 19, 1972 an underwater in-

vestigation was performed by EPA Region I divers in the Lop Storage

Pond on the St. Croix River, Woodland, Maine.  The diving operation

was to determine the areal extent of bottom coverage due to sunken

pulp lops, bark and related debris.  Divers mapped, photographed, and

counted sunken logs.  Also, the divers provided assistance and ground

truth data to Geological Survey Systems, North Billerica, Massachusetts

for its use in conducting subsurface investigations.  (See Appendix F).

     Diving activities were conducted in impounded portions of the

St. Croix River known as Mill Pond and a two mile reach of Woodland Lake.

Mill Pond is a small body of water extending from the Woodland Dam north

to the railroad bridge at Woodland Junction.  The two mile reach of

Woodland Lake extended from the railroad bridge in Woodland Junction up-

stream.  These two sections have a combined surface area of approximately

666 acrea (1.04 square miles).

     Woodland Lake and Mill Pond are used by the Georgia-Pacific

Corporation Woodland, for the wet storage of pulp logs.  During the time

of this investigation the southeastern portion of Woodland Lake (locally

known as Hanson Cove) and the entire Mill Pond were being used for log

storage.  Large booms adjacently rigged from north to south for approx-

imately 0.6 mile and east to west for approximately 0.5 mile are used to

keep the logs fn position (see Figure G-l).  Of the 666 acres previously

mentioned, about 266 acres were actively being used for the wet storage

of logs.

                               G-l

-------
     A huge bark pile in Woodland Junction boarded the shore line of




the Woodland Lake for about 0.5 mile  (Figure 6-1).  Several small man-




made boom rigging islands dot the lake surface.




DIVING LOCATIONS




     Diving locations were randomly selected in the field by the EPA




diving coordinator.  The locations were chosen to include as much of the




study area as possible to get representative impressions of bottom con-




ditions.




     Diving in the southeastern portion of the lake was precluded due to




the logs in storage.  Peripheral areas were investigated by swimming under




the logs from open water.  Mill Pond, which was tightly packed with logs,




was examined by diving from shore using life lines.




     Figure G-l shows the diving locations in consecutive numbers from




south to north.  The solid circles indicate the general areas which were




extensively surveyed by divers and the open circles represent areas which




were spot checked for bottom conditions.




GENERAL REMARKS - BOTTOM CONDITIONS




     Wherever EPA divers conducted diving operations in Woodland Lake




and in the adjacent Mill Pond, sunken logs, lying in various config-




urations on the bottom were encountered.  The logs lay in an assorted




jumble of non uniform layers on the bottom.




     The sunken logs were approximately four feet long and varied in




diameter from three inches to 24 inches.




     Generally, the lake bottom from  the channel east to the Canadian




shore was more densely laden with logs than was the west side.  This is




probably due to prevailing winds from a westerly direction or the
                               G-2

-------
       LEGEND

O Dive site - spot check
• Dive site - intense examination

  Pulpwood in storage
          DIVE  LOCATIONS
         ST.  CROIX  RIVER
                                               WOODLAND'
                                                                         FIGURE  G-l

-------
dredging of logs from the pond bottom on the west side of the lake.  The




Mill Pond had the greatest abundance of sunken logs.




     Spaces and gaps did exist between logs lying on the bottom.  The




gaps varied from a few inches up to eight feet across.  The gaps were




heavily laden with bark mixtures, wood fragments and woody debris inter-




spersed with a fine silt.  Depending on location the debris ranged from




one inch to more than two feet deep.  The amount of debris increased in




the downstream portions of the Woodland Lake study area, and Mill Pond




had the heaviest concentrations.




     Overlying the logs and other related matter was a fine flocculent




substance which was easily disturbed and resuspended.  This floe, when




subjected to microscopic examination, resembled a colloidal humus or




humoid substance.




     Core samples taken by the EPA divers showed that a light gray clay




type material underlies the log and debris deposits.  This clay is found




throughout Woodland Lake and Mill Pond.  Exposed areas of the natural river



bed are found in the channel.  These areas contain a high percentage of




rocks, stones and coarse gravel.




     Depths of logs laying on the bottom are made in terms of layers (the




count of logs piled or leaning against one another i.e. 2-3 layers).




     Depths of the bark, woody debris and floe deposits were estimated in




linear measure.  For example, by penetrating the deposit with his hand and




arm a diver can determine relative depth (i.e. penetration to the




wrist - approximately eight inches, elbow - 18 inches and shoulder




24 or more inches).




     Log counts were performed on compass bearings from a selected bottom






                              G-3

-------
 point  for  a  distance  of  about  100  feet.  The  divers  counted  lops  and



 portions of  logs  over which  their  bodies passed.  The width  of  the path




 normally would not be greater  than six  feet,  thus the area of coverage on



 any  compass  bearing from the point selected was approximately equal to 600




 square feet.  Occasionally,  the  logs  lying wholly or partially  within an




 area estimated to be  100 square  feet  were counted.



     The following observations  and results regarding the bottom  conditions




 are  considered to be  a fair  representation of the general dive  locations.



 These  results are compendiums  of the  individual divers'  impressions of




 bottom conditions.




 OBSERVATION  AND RESULTS




 Dive Location 1                  August 16




     The surface  of the  Mill Pond  was tightly packed with floating pulp



 wood.  Much  of the pulpwood  was  partially or  totally debarked.  In many




 cases  the  remaining bark was in  the process of sloughing off.   Access to



 Mill Pond was from the U.S.A.  shore.  Logs partially and totally  sunken




 along  shore  impeded entry into the water.  The divers had to crawl and push



 their way  from shore  until they  reached a water depth which  enabled them to



 dive under the floating  pulpwood.




     The bottom was densely  covered with logs.  The  sunken logs are



 conservatively estimated  to  be four times more plentiful on  the bottom.




     Between the  sunken  logs were  deposits of bark,  woody debris, wood



 fragments and silt.   Overlying the logs and related  deposits was  a fine




 light  floe which was  easily  disturbed and resuspended.   While obtaining a




 core sample of the bottom material, the corer penetrated the deposits its



entire length (30 inches) plus the length of the divers  arm  to  the elbow.






                             G-4

-------
By fanning away the debris, the end of the corer was exposed and retrieved.




These deposits are estimated to exceed three feet.  Logs were encountered




beneath these deposits.




     The bottom of the pond was investigated for  a distance of 100 yards




from shore.  Log coverage was fairly uniform with typical coverage of three




to five layers of logs.




     The log density is characterized as:  Very heavy.




Dive Location 2                  August 17




     The range of this dive extended from areas under the floating pulp-




wood to areas of channel.  Logs were present lying flat on the bottom and




in a jumble from upright to horizontal.  Bottom coverage was fairly uniform




with the logs layered approximately two to four deep.  Gaps between logs of




up to six feet were observed.




     Bark, woody debris, silt and floe deposits were deep here.  A diver




pushed his arm to shoulder level into these deposits.




     A diver, swimming on a north compass bearing for 100 feet from Point 2,




counted the logs over which he passed.




     1.  140 logs



     2.  161 logs




     A diver counted 25 logs in two, 100 square feet areas adjacent to




Point 2.




     The log density in this area is characterized as: Light - Moderate.




Dive Location 3                  August 18




     Logs generally one layer deep with two layers the maximum depth.




The logs were usually lying flat on the bottom.  Depositions of bark,




wood fragments etc. was not as extensive as noted at locations one and  two.






                              6-5

-------
Submerged vegetation was notably more abundant.

     The log density in this area is characterized as:  Light.

Dive Location 4                  August 18

     Bottom fairly uniformly covered with logs.  Logs are layered 2-4

deep with some gaps existing between them.  Sunken bark, wood, fragments

and debris have accumulated to depths up to 18 inches.  Overlying the logs

and debris was the fine flocculent substance previously noted.

     The log density is characterized as:  Moderate.

Dive Location 5                  August 18

     Observations similar to location 4 above with variable gaps up to

five feet between logs.

     The log density is characterized as:  Moderate.

Dive Location 6                  August 17-18

     This location is situated approximately 1/8 mile off the U.S.A.

shore.  The bottom had a good deal of stumps and some trees lopped off at

six feet.  Many of the stumps were trapping sunken logs and submerged dead

heads causing piles to be created, accumulations of which reached five
                                   c
layers.  The logs otherwise are uniformly layered 1-2 deep with some four

layered areas.  Gaps up to eight feet across contained no logs.  The substrate

comprised bark, wood fragments and woody debris interspersed with silt and

floe.  Depth of this debris laden substrate was highly variable.  Eighteen

inches was the maximum observed.

     Logs counted by divers on compass bearings for 100 feet indicate

relative numbers of logs over which the diver passed.

     From Point 6 due east, two counts.

               1.  183 logs


                             8-6

-------
               2.  178 logs




     From Point 6 due west, one count




               1.  220 lops




     Log density is characterized as:  Moderate.




Dive Location 7                  August 16, 17




     Diving activities in this area extended from a location 1/8 mile




from the Canadian shore southward into shallow water (3-5 feet deep) .




westward to river channel and northerly about 100 yards.



     Logs covered the bottom in every direction with fewer in the




vicinity of the channel.




     Layering of the logs was variable with 1-2 layers commonly seen and




3 to 4 layers less frequently observed.  The logs of the largest diameter




were on the bottom of the log piles.




     Bark, wood fragments and debris covered the bottom to depths of up




to 18 inches.  Some logs were totally or partially buried beneath the




substrate.




     Near shore, stumps of trees and larger tree trunks were seen.  Sunken




pulpwood was normally lying flat on the bottom generally one layer




deep.  The logging debris was estimated to be l"-6" deep nearer




shore.




     In the river channel (30 feet deep water) exposed portions of  the river




bed indicated the presence of ledge and broadfaced rocks, etc. one  to two




layers deep with large gaps between logs.




     Approximately 20 feet north from the intersection of the two large




logging booms .was a pile of logs about six or eight feet high.  Divers could




not determine if the pile was a natural outcropping of the bottom covered






                             G- 7

-------
with logs or an acutal pile of logs.



     Logs counted by divers swimming on different compass bearings for 100



feet are:




     From Point 7 northeast, two counts



               1.  330 logs



               2.  279 logs




     From Point 7 due south, one count



               1.  150 logs




     From Point 7 due west toward channel, one count



               1.  78 logs



     Log densities are characterized as:  Moderate - Heavy.



Dive Location 8                  August 18




     Bottom  visibility at this location was hindered due to log recovery




operations being conducted by the Georgia-Pacific Corporation Verification



for the presence of logs was made by feeling and groping on the bottom.



The logs were estimated to be layered 2-3 deep with variable gaps up to




five feet separating the logs.  Bottom materials, bark, wood




fragments etc. are estimated to be no deeper than 12 inches.  Some



of this area is channel.




     Log densities are characterized as:  Light - Moderate.



Dive Location 9                  August 18




     Observations similar to those above with improved visibility.



Logs were either lying flat on the bottom or in assorted jumbles from




upright to horizontal. Logging debris was present.  Some of the area is in




the channel.



     Log density characterized as:  Light - Moderate.






                             6-8

-------
Dive Location 10                 August 18




     Considerable logs were sunken at visible depths near shore with



layers as great as four deep.  Some logs protruded from the water




surface.  Proceeding westerly from shore the logs were fairly uniformly




layered at one to two deep.  The substrate comprised bark, wood fragments



interspersed with silt overlain by a layer of floe.



     Log density characterized as:  Moderate.



Dive Location 11                August 18




     Logs were layered two to three deep.  The substrate comprised silted



bark and wood fragments ranging from four to eight inches deep.  Logs nearly



covered the bottom however some gaps three to four feet existed.




     Log density characterized as:  Moderate.



Dive Location 12                 August 18



     Logs observed on bottom one to two layers deep with accumulations




of four layers frequently encountered.  Logs were tightly packed with



few gaps exceeding one foot.  The logs were situated on the bottom in



a Jumble from horizontal to upright.




     The bottom material was composed of bark, wood fragments and woody




debris interspersed with silt.  The depths of these woody materials were



six to twelve inches.




     Log density characterized as:  Heavy.




Dive Location 13                 August 18




     Logs were layered one to two deep. Some logs lay flat on the bottom




with others lying on or leaning against these.  Some four to five feet



gaps existed between logs.




     Gaps were overlain with bark, woody material, silt, etc. to six






                             G-9

-------
inches in depth.  A light flocculent substance was overlying the benthic

materials.

     Log density characterized as:  Light - Moderate.

Sunken log counts and estimates of total logs sunken

     By utilizing the count data generated in the field and applying

logical assumptions a reasonable estimate of sunken logs in Woodland Lake

can be obtained.

     Previously reported were counts of sunken logs given for 100' x 61 areas

in different parts of Woodland Lake.  These were:

     183, 179, 140, 161, 150, 279, 330, and 78.

     The average of these counts is 187 logs/600 square feet.

     1.  Let count equal 185 logs/600 square feet.

     2.  The study area as previously described is 666 acres.

         At 4.3560X104 square feet/acre

         Total area square feet = 4.3560X104 square feet/acre

                                  X 666 acre	

                                29,010,960 square feet

     3.  Estimate total logs - 185 logs           X 29,010,960 square feet
                               600 square feet

         =  8,945,120 or approximately 9.0 million logs.

         To estimate cords of wood.

         1  cord - 128 cubic feet or 4'X4'X8'

         A  stick of pulpwood averages 4'X8" diameter

         By mathematics 72 logs/cord

         but say 	 80 logs/cord

         9.0 million logs
         80 logs/cord      = approximately 110,000 cords of wood


                            G-10

-------
Allow for 50% error and the possible range is



         55,000 cords to 165,000 cords.




     These estimates are intended to be conservative.  Note that the



figures are for only part of the pulpwood storage and log driving



areas.
                            G-ll

-------
APPENDIX  H

-------
                   SEDIMENT OXYGEN DEMAND STUDIES

                ST. CROIX RIVER, MAINE - AUGUST 1972


                          Allen M. Lucas
                         Aquatic Biologist
                       Water Sciences Branch
        National Field Investigations Center - Cincinnati
            5555 Ridge Avenue, Cincinnati, Ohio  45268


     At the request of the Director, Division of Surveillance and

Analysis, Region I, EPA, oxygen demand rates of bottom sediments were

measured in a 20-mile long reach of the St. Croix River in the vicinity

of Woodland, Maine (Figure H-l).  The study was conducted by the National

Field Investigations Center - Cincinnati during the period of August 8-14,

1972, in support of an overall investigation by EPA, Region I to determine

the effects on the river of pulp and paper making activities of the

Georgia-Pacific Corporation, Woodland, Maine.

     Sediment oxygen demand (SOD) rates were obtained by measuring the

changes in the dissolved oxygen content of water sealed and circulated

in plexiglas chambers (Figure H-2) embedded in the river sediments.

Measurements were made only in areas where the bottom was soft enough to

permit the chamber cutting edge to penetrate and effect a seal.  The

chambers covered 0.186 square meter of river bottom and held 14.5 liters

of river water.  Water was circulated with a 12-volt submersible pump.

Changes in the dissolved oxygen content of the entrapped water were

measured with portable DO meters.  Dissolved oxygen changes were sufficient

within 15 to 90 minutes to estimate the oxygen demand of the sediments.

     The effectiveness of the chamber to river-bottom seal was measured

by adding a concentrated salt (NaCl) solution to the chamber water  to
                              H-l

-------
 increase  its  specific  conductivity  above  the  conductivity  of  the  river

 water.  The increased  conductivity  was  then monitored  during  the  test

 run.  Logs and  large wood  chips  on  the  river  bottom at some locations

 made  it necessary  that SCUBA divers place the chambers on  the river

 bottom to ensure a maximum chamber-to-sediment seal.   Nevertheless,

 effective seals were difficult to obtain  at several locations.  In these

 cases estimates of the oxygen demand rates, based  on changes  in specific

 conductivity,  of the chamber water,  were calculated.

      To determine  if bottom sediments within  the chambers  were disturbed

 during the test runs,  water trapped in  the chamber plumbing after each

 test  run  was  visually  inspected.

      The  SOD  rates were calculated  on an  areal basis using the following

 formula:                SOD - (Ci -  Cf)  V
                                 tA
                                                    f\
      where :  SOD  = sediment uptake rate  in gm 02/m /day
              V   = volume of confined  water  in m^ (0.0145)
              A   = bottom area within  chamber in  m% (.186)
              t   - test period  in  days
              Ci   « initial measured DO of chamber water in mg/1
              Cf   « final  measured  DO of  chamber water in  mg/1


 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

      SOD  rates  measured in the St.  Croix  River in  areas unaffected by

 active logging  or  pulp and paper making operations (Stations  Ic,  2 and

 10) ranged from 0.9 to 2.4 gm 02/m2/day*  (Table H-l). Bottom substrate

 in these  areas  were primarily mud and silt.


 *  A measurement made  with a clear  chamber indicated that  benthic algae
                                           2
 present at Station 10  produced 0.3  gm 02/m /day in excess  of  the  sediment

oxygen demand during at least part  of the daylight hours.
                             H-2

-------
                                              MILES
                                        DAM SITES
UNITED STATES
                       WOODLAND;
                         ST CROIX RIVER
     LOCATIONS USED  TO MEASURE  SEDIMENT  OXYGEN DEMAND
                                                              FIGURE H-l

-------
                                                                                         •0--RING BETWEEN

                                                                                         PUMP * CHAMBER   CMECK VALVB
                                                   DISSOLVED
                                                   °OXVGEN
                                                     PROBE
                                                                     CONDUCTIVITY

                                                                                                                                  STAINLESS STEEL
f
to
                                                                     Sediment oxygen demand chamber.

-------
                                                                               TABLE H-l
                                                                       SEDIMENT OXYGEN DEMAND RATES
<*>
ST. CROIX
RIVER, MAINE
AUGUST 8-14, 1972







SEDIMENT OXYGEN DEMAND
STATION
1C Midchannel
Midchannel
2 Midchannel
3 ' Midchannel
4 Midchannel
Midchannel
5 Midchannel
Midchannel
7 Midchannel
Midchannel
Canadian
Side
8 Canadian
Side
Canadian
Side
Canadian
Side
DATE . TIME
8/14/72 1140-1235
1155-1240
8/8/72 1820-1905

8/13/72 1550-1605
1510-1605
8/13/72 1740-1815
1750-1820
8/12/72 1235-1250
1335-1350
1445-1500
8/11/72 1610-1700
1656-1700
1750-1755
' BOTTOM TTOE
Mud-silt
Mud-silt
Silt-bark
Bark
Baric-silt
lark-silt
Bark-silt
Bark-silt
Wood fibers • chips
Wood fibers - plant
detritus
Wood fibers & Sawdust
Wood fibers & silt
over sludge
Wood fibers 6 silt
over sludge
Wood fibers & silt
over sludge
DO OF
BOTTOM
WATER
TOR/1
8.0
8.0
7.8

-
-
7.6
7.6
7.8
7.8
7.3
6.0
6.0
6.0
CORRECTION
MEASURED FOR LEAKAGE
RATE AltBIENT DO

2.3
2.4
1.3

4.1
2.5
2.4
2.8
7.1
6.0
6.7
3.7
12.6
6.7
8jB 02 /m*/ day
2.3
*
2.2
No rate
•*
*
2.7
2.9
*
6.3
*
4.0
*
*
BOTTOM CONDITIONS IN
CHAMBER CHAMBER
Black
Clear
Clear

Slightly roiled Black
Clear
Clear
Black
Slightly roiled Black
Clear
Clear
Black.
Moderately roiled Clear
Slightly roiled Black

-------
                                                                TABLE H-l continued
                                                           SEDIMENT OXYGEN DEMAND RATES
ST. CROIX RIVER,
AUGUST 8-14,





MAINE
1972


• SEDIMENT OXYGEN DEMAND
STATION DATE
Canadian
Side
9 Midchannel 8/10/72
10 Midchannel 8/11/72
Midchannel
11 Midchannel 8/10/72
Midchannel 8/10/72
12 U.S. Side 8/14/72
U.S. Side
Canadian
Side
Canadian
Side
TIME
1730-1815
1625-1705
1055-1220
1105-1220
1415-1440
1325-1400
1535-1550
1515-1555
1640-1705
1640-1705
BOTTOM TYPE
Wood fibers & silt
over sludge
Wood chips
Mud-clay-algae
Mud-clay-algae
Wood chips & bark
Wood chips & bark
Wood fiber & sawdust
Wood fiber & sawdust
Wood fiber & sawdust
Wood fiber & sawdust
DO OF
BOTTOM
WATER
6.0
6.4
7.3
7.3
6.1
6.1
5.3
5.3
5.3
5.3
CORRECTION
MEASURED FOR LEAKAGE
RATE AMBIENT DO

3.4
1.3
0.9
- 0.3
4.0
3.7
2.2
2.8
2.5
2.7
gm 02/m2/day
*
4.7
•*
'*'
5.6
4.5
*
3.0
*
2.8
BOTTOM CONDITIONS IN
CHAMBER ** CHAMBER
Clear
Clear
Black
Clear
Black
Clear
Black
Clear
Black
Clear
*  No leakage

**  Based on visual examination of water trapped in chamber plumbing at end of test run; unrolled unless noted.

-------
     Stations 4 and 5, upstream from Georgia-Pacific Corporation, are


areas where active logging operations occur.  Logs destined for the


pulp mill are floated down river to the wood storage area at Woodland.


The river bottom in this reach of the river was strewn with sunken logs.


The SOD chambers were placed by SCUBA divers in pockets among the logs.


The substrate in these pockets, primarily bark fragments with some silt,

                                             *y
had oxygen demand rates of 2.7 to 4.1 gm 02/m /day.  These rates are


similar to rates measured on bark sediments in the Klamath River, Oregon


(Table H-2).


     Downstream from Georgia-Pacific Corporation and the city of Woodland


the bottom sediments contained waste products associated with pulp and


paper making operations.  Bark, wood chips, dust, and fibers were found on


the river bottom.  Depositions of the lighter materials, such as sawdust


and wood fibers, occurred in the more slack water areas.


     SOD rates measured on sediments that contained large amounts of


coarse wood chips and bark (Stations 9 and 11) ranged from 4.5 to 4.7


gm 02/m2/day.  Chamber seals were least effective at these locations.


     Highest oxygen demands by sediments were measured approximately


one mile downstream from the Georgia-Pacific mill  (Station 7).  Sediments


composed primarily of wood fibers and chips had oxygen demand rates of

                  p
6.3 to 7.1 gm 02/m /day.


     Oxygen demand rates measured on wood fiber - silt deposits  (Station


8) and on wood fiber and sawdust banks  (Station 12) were similar and


ranged from 2.8 to 4.0 gm 02/m^/day.  Sawdust deposits in the Klamath


River, Oregon,.had an oxygen demand of 3.0 gm 02/m2/day  (Table H-2).   Silt-


sludge deposits located downstream from pulp and paper mill discharges



                               H-5

-------
                                    TABLE H-2
                       SEDIMENT OXYGEN DEMAND OF VARIOUS
                        RIVERS AND ASSOCIATED POLLUTANTS
 RIVER
  POLLUTANT OR BOTTOM TYPE
  SEDIMENT **
OXYGEN DEMAND
 Hoston River, Tenn.
 (Thomas & Lucas, 1969)
 Klamath River, Oregon
 (Thomas, 1968)
 Licking River, Kentucky
 (Personal Data)

 Mill Creek, Ohio
 (Personal Data)

 .Ohio River, Kentucky
 (Ballentine, Thomas
 & Mathur, 1970)
Incinerator ash

Paper mill wastes               )
Chemical production waste       )
Sewage treatment plant discharge)

Vepetation

Algae

Bark

Sawdust

Agricultural runoff

Silt
Sewage


Sand
        (.

Sewage sludge

Sphaerotilus natans
 Reservoirs—North Carolina Undisturbed lake bed bottom
 (Warner, Ballentine, &
 Keup, 1969)                  Cleared lake bed bottom
 Willamette River, Oregon
 (Thomas, 1970)
Natural substrate (primarily sand)

Pulp and paper mill wastes
(silt-sludge deposits)
     2.3


    16.0


     3.7

     6.7

     2.1

     3.0

     4.4*

     1.2


     4.8


     0.75

     6.1

    12.1

     1.2

     0.9

 0.8-3.7

 5.1-19.5
 *DO very low

** gm 02/nr/day
                                   H-6

-------
on the Willamete River, Oregon, were characterized by SOD rates greater




than 5.1 gm 02/m2/day.




     Thomas (1970) found that the oxygen demand of Willamete River




sediments associated with pulp and paper making wastes were greatest




during early summer when water temperatures were increasing and the amount




of oxidizable materials in the sediments was greatest.  During the cooler




periods of the year, low temperatures inhibited oxygen consuming processes




in the sediments and permitted waste materials to accumulate.  In late




summer, although water temperatures were maximal, the oxygen demand of




the sediments had decreased because oxidizable materials in the sediments




had been partially utilized.




     The effect of sediment resuspension in the St. Croix River caused by




high flow conditions are reflected by rates measured at Stations 4, 7, and




8.  Oxygen demand rates of roiled sediments within the chambers were




approximately 50 to 425 percent greater than rates on undisturbed




sediments.
                               H-7

-------
                           REFERENCES




1.  Ballentine, R. K., Thomas, N. A., and Mathur, S. P.   1970.

    "Water Quality Survey, Ohio River, Louisville, Kentucky -


    Evansville, Indiana."  National Field Investigations Center,

    FWPCA, Dept. of Interior, Cincinnati, Ohio.  Manuscript.

2.  Thomas, N. A.  1968.  "Results From Truckee and Klamath River

    Studies."  Technical Advisory and Investigations Branch, FWPCA,


    Dept. of Interior, Cincinnati, Ohio.  Memorandum Report.

3.  Thomas, N. A. and Lucas, A. M.  1969.  "Benthic Oxygen Demand

    Studies, Holston River — Tennessee."  National Field Investigations

    Center, FWPCA, Dept. of Interior, Cincinnati, Ohio.   Memorandum

    Report.


4.  Thomas, N. A.  1970.  "Sediment Oxygen Demand Investigations  of  the

    Willamette River, Portland, Oregon."  U. S. Dept. of the Interior,


    FWPCA, National Field Investigations Center, Cincinnati, Ohio.   8 pp.
                                (.
5.  Warner, R. W., Ballentine, R. K., and Keup, L. E.  1969.  "Black -


    Water Impoundment Investigations.1   Technical Advisory and

    Investigations Branch, FWPCA, Dept. of Interior, Cincinnati,  Ohio.


    95 pp.
                               H-8

-------
APPENDIX I

-------
                A STUDY OF THE TOXICITY OF

            THE GEORGIA-PACIFIC PULP AND PAPER

             MILL EFFLUENT, IN WOODLAND, MAINE
                        R. P. COTE
WATER SURVEILLANCE UNIT
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION SERVICE
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT
HALIFAX, NOVA SCOTIA

AUGUST, 1972

                           1-1

-------
                       INTRODUCTION
         At the request of the International Joint Commission
and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, the Water
Surveillance Unit of EPS participated in a comprehensive
survey of the St. Croix River in August, 1972.

         The involvement of the Physiological Testing
Laboratory was requested for two primary purposes:

1.  to conduct semi-static (bioassay test solution replaced
    every 24 hours) 96 hr. TLm dilution type bioassays
    according to the APHA Standard Methods manual  (13th
    edition) in the mobile laboratory.

2.  to conduct flow-through fish bioassays using the
    effluent of the Georgia-Pacific pulp and paper mill.

         The purpose of our work was to demonstrate the
effect of the discharge from the mill on Atlantic salmon,
Salmo salar L., a species which once frequented the St. Croix
River.

         After the initial contacts were made by Mr. J. A.
Dalziel, A/Regional Director of EPS Atlantic Region, with
E.P.A. officials, correspondence by mail and telephone led
to a meeting in St. Stephen on August  1 between EPA and EPS
representatives to set down the logistics of our part of the
survey in greater detail.

         The work of the Physiological Testing Laboratory
began on August 7 with the arrival of the Bioassay Trailer
and three lab assistants.  Mr. R. P. Cote, EPS toxicologist,
arrived at Woodland on August 9 and personally supervised
the mobile toxicity laboratory operations.
PROCEDURES;

1.  General

         The bioassay trailer was delivered to the Woodland,
Maine high school site on August 7 and power was connected.
The EPS pickup truck transported river water to the trailer
several times daily to be used as the dilution water for the
bioassays; our vehicle was manned by EPA personnel who had
agreed to provide us with water as well as effluent.  Their
deliveries proceeded smoothly throughout the study period.
Reasonable precautions were taken to ensure that neither
the dilution water, nor the effluent was tampered with.
                           1-2

-------
         The lab assistants worked 8 hour shifts to cover
the 24 hours and thus all tests were well monitored, and
any problems which arose could be handled immediately.

         The Atlantic salmon used in the bioassays were
collected from the St. John Fish Culture Station in
St. John, N.B. and taken to the trailer.  The fish were
placed in aerated holding tanks equiped with filters; the
temperature of the water in these tanks was maintained at
15JD°+1.0°C by regulating the air temperature in an insulated
portion of the trailer which serves as the bioassay lab.
No mortalities occurred in the holding tanks during the 10
day period.  The transfer from hatchery water to St. Croix
River water was done with a dilution series.

2.  Semi-static bioassays with fingerling salmon;

         In these tests, the test-solution is replaced every
24 hours by transferring the fish into fresh solutions.  The
procedures described in the 13th edition of the APHA Standard
Methods were generally followed for the semi-static tests.
This applied to the following points:

a)   Selection of test fish
b)   Preparation of the test fish
c)   Selection of the diluent
d)   Temperature
e)   Dissolved oxygen
f)   Concentrations of toxicants
g)   Controls
h)   Number of test fish
i)   Transfer of test fish
j)   Feeding of fish
k)   Calculation and reporting of results.

         Samples were collected hourly by EPA personnel
and composited in 25 gallon containers.  Before the required
volumes were removed for preparation of the semi-static tests,
the effluent was thoroughly mixed.  Plastic tanks were then
filled with required 20 liter mixtures of effluent and dilution
water.  Slight aeration was applied to each test tank and the
water was allowed to equilibrate to 15.0°C.  When the dissolved
oxygen level reached 6.0 ppm as determined by a YSI oxygen
meter and the temperature reached 15.0°C, the pH was  recorded
and ten Salmo salar fingerlings were introduced to each
bioassay tank.The pH recordings were made with a Fisher
Accumet pH meter.  Screen covers were installed on the tanks
to prevent the escape of fish.
                           1-3

-------
                            rv» ft*
                       •r-t
   Plate 1.  The mobile bioassay laboratory of the
             Environmental Protection Service at
             Woodland, Maine.
         Temperature, D.O. and pH measurements were made
every 8 hours during the test period as well as after the
death of the last fish in each tank.  Dead fish removed from
the tanks, were frozen immediately in dry ice for histological
examination at a later date.  At the end of the study, salmon
from the semi-static and continuous -flow bio as says were placed
in a fixative (Dietrich's solution) and taken to the EPA National
Marine Water Quality Laboratory in Rhode Island.            » -
         Table I lists the mean temperatures, dissolved oxygen,
pH and lengths of fish for all semi-static bioassays.
                              1-4

-------
  Table I.
            Mean temperatures dissolved oxygen levels,  pH and
            fish lengths values  of all tests conducted  with
            Georgia-Pacific mill effluent.
Type of Test   Cone.  (%)   Temperature  D.O.     pH
                                       (ppm)
                                                       Fish
                                                       Length (cm)
Semi static



,





Semi- static
Control


100
100
56
56
56
32
32
17
17

_
-
—
14.5
14.7
14.6
14.5
14.6
14.7
14.6
14.6
14.7

14.5
14.3
14.4
6.2
6.4
6.3
6.3
6.4
6.4
6.4
6.3
6.5
6.4
6.0
6.5
6.7
7.2
7.2
6.9
6.9
6.9
6.7
6.7
6.7
6.5
6.5
6.1
6.6
6.2
4.2
4.6
4.0
4.0
4.1
3.9
4.2
4.1
4.3
4.2
_
-
—
         The mean temperatures listed in Table I demonstrate
that the bioassay trailer temperature control system is able
to maintain a set level within a degree Centigrade.  Dissolved
oxygen levels were maintained at or above 6.0 ppm  (70%
saturation) in all tanks, except in one control tank where
the D.O. concentration dropped to 5.9 for a few hours.  The
mean pH readings were well within the acceptible range for
salmon.

3.  Semi-static bioassays with yearling salmon;

         In an attempt to determine the effect of the G-P mill
effluent on another life stage of Salmo salar, yearling salmon
were obtained from the St. John Fish Culture Station and used
in bioassays.

         For this set of tests, one tank was prepared with 56%
effluent, a second one was set up with 32% effluent and a
third, as a control.  Five salmon only, were introduced to
each tank, creating a ratio of 2 gms of fish per liter of
solution.  This ratio is twice that of the bioassays with the
fingerling salmon.
                            1-5

-------
Table II.  Mean temperatures, dissolved oxygen, pH and lengths
           of yearling Salmo salar in semi-static bioassays.

Concentration   Temperature   D.O. (ppm)    pH     Fish length (cm)
56
32
Control
14.6
14.5
14.5
6.2
6.5
6.6
6.7
6.4
6.0
10.2
10.1
—
4.  Continuous-flow bioassays;

           These tests were conducted according to a procedure
and dilution unit developed at the Physiological Testing
Laboratory.  A proportional diluter was designed (Cote and
Parker, 1972) for use in continuous monitoring of industrial
effluents.  The diluter is based on the principle that in a
tank with a constant head of water, the rate of flow through
open valves is directly proportional to the area of the valve
opening.  Thus valves with holes having areas in a set ratio,
will produce concentrations in test tanks receiving the flowage
from the diluter in the same ratio.  The proportional diluter used,
is able to provide these concentrations of effluent and a control.
The concentrations which can be studied at present are 100%,
75%, 65%, 50%, 35% and 25%.

           The effluent solutions flow into the bioassay tanks
at 400 ml/min and continuously overflow through stand-pipes
into a drain.  In this way, a 90% molecular replacement of
the test solution occurs in approximately 6 hours.
                               t
           The main purpose of a continuous-flow bioassay
system  is to replenish the toxicants (if they are present
in the effluent) which might be degraded  or oxidized in the
test tank during static conditions.  This situation, then, more
closely approaches that of an outfall continuously pouring
effluent into a body of water such as a river.  Previous
studies have led us to expect that the LT50 values in
continuous-flow bioassays would be lower than those in static
or semi-static tests.

           Average temperature, dissolved oxygen, pH and
lengths were calculated and are listed in Table III.
                             1-6

-------
          r
            <. 4

            D
                   X
                   L?
                                 \

Plate 2.  The proportional diluter utilized
          for the continuous-flow bioassays
                             ;}

                                       '•••'
Plate 3.
The test tanks used during the Georgia-
Pacific study.  (Note the difference in color
between the clean river water and Georgia-
Pacific mill effluent.
                            1-7

-------
Table III.  Mean temperatures, dissolved oxygen, pH and
            lengths of fish from the continuous-flow
            bioassays with G-D mill effluent.

Concentration  Temperature   D.O.  (ppm)    pH     Fish Length
     (%)          (°C)                               (cm)
75
75
65
50
50
35
25
25
Control
Control
15.4
14.1
14.4
15.6
14.3
14 . 7
15.2
14.6
14.5
14.5
5.6
5.9
6.2
6.0
6.4
6.2
5.9
6.1
6.1
6.2
8.2
7.3
6.5
8.0
6.7
6.5
7.5
6.4
6.1
6.2
4.5
4.2
3.9
4.0
4.3
4.4
4.2
3.5
-
—
5.  Static bioassays with foam condensates;

          Foam was collected from the effluent cooling tank
in the bioassay trailer and allowed to liquefy.  Anticipating
a more toxic condition, two tanks containing 10% and 5%  foam
condensate respectively, were prepared; a control tank was
also set up.  Ten fingerling salmon were introduced into each
bioassay tank.

Table IV. Mean temperatures, dissolved oxygen, pH and
          lengths of fish from the foam condensate bioassays.

Concentration   Temperature    D.O. (ppm)     pH     Fish Length
    (%)           (°C)                           	(cm)
5
10
Control
14.4
14.3
14.3
6.7
6.7
6.7
€.1
5.9
6.0
-
4.2
-
6.  Samples for Chemical Analysis;

          Frozen samples of the foam, control river water,
100% effluent, river water taken beneath logs above the mill,
and river water taken downstream from the mill were frozen
in dry ice and returned to the EPS Pollution Laboratories in
Halifax for resin acid and lignin analyses.  These samples
were placed in a locked freezer and handled by the staff of
the EPS Chemistry Laboratory.
                              1-8

-------
Results and Discussion;

          The results of the semi static bioassay tests using
fingerling Atlantic salmon are presented in Table V.   The
graphs used to derive the LT50 values are presented in
Figures 1 to 5.

Table V.  The concentrations, percent survival and LT50
          values for the Georgia-Pacific effluent.
Test
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J



Concentration (%)
100
100
56
56
56
32
32
32
17
17
Control
Control
Control
% Survival
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
100
100
100
LT50 (hours)
12
9.7
22
17
23
34
40
62 *
76
37 *
>96
>96
>96
*  In the case of the 17% effluent bioassay, the operator
   found that an air valve was working improperly, thus
   creating an artifact in the toxicity.

         No explanation has been presented for the anomolous
LT50 in the 32% concentration.  Since the pH agrees with those
of the other two 32% tests, it must be assumed that the initial
concentration was 32%.  The recorded pH at 48 hours, however,
was lower than that of the other two.

         Because of these variations, these results have not
been used in the preparation of the toxicity curve.
                                 1-9

-------
Figure 1.  The lethal time  (LT50)  for fingerling salmon
           exposed to 100%  Georgia-Pacific mill effluent
           as derived by semi  static bioassay testing.
           (Tests A, B).
1 W
A.
90
60
70
60
4 SO
LJ
0
30
20
to
0
100
B.
90
* 80
70
60
< 50
Ul
0
30
20
• 10
°







































































-



•












































•6-81 2 345678








































.6 .8










1






























*











,




























2 3 4 ft 6 7 8

1


'


I

12
10
1



i
I
1
I
|
I 19.7
10


















































20 30 4O SO
EXPOSURE HOURS



















' -






























20 30 40 SO










70










70
'






.

•
100


t



























200








































400







\




























•












1
600 1000



»






i
1
I
•
i
i









!






100 200 400 600 «00<
                           EXPOSURE HOURS
                        1-10

-------
             Figure 2.  The  lethal time (LT50)  for fingerling salmon
                         exposed to 56%  Georgia  Pacific mill  effluent
                         as derived by semi static bioassays
                          (Tests C, D).
c.
  too
   90



   BO


   70



   60
  40
  20
   10
      .6  .8  I
                       3  4 S 6 7 8  iO
D.
  too
                 ZO  30 40 SO  70  100
                EXPOSURE HOURS
                                                                   200
4OO 600   IOOO
  90



  80



  TO



  60
 §50
                                                                                    i
  30


  20


  10
      .6  .8  I
-4  6678 10
                                           20   30  40 SO  70  100     200
                                          EXPOSURE HOURS
 400  600   IOOO
                                         1-11

-------
             Figure 3.  The lethal  time  (LT50)  for fingerling  salmon

                         exposed to  56% (Test  E)  and  32% (Test  F)

                         Georgia Pacific mill  effluent.
  too
E.
  90
  80
  70
  60
< 50
w
o
  30
  20
     .6  .8
                                             '73
                       3  4 5 6 7 8  IO
F.
 100
 20   30  40 50  70   100

EXPOSURE HOURS
                                                                    200
       400  600   ICCO
  eo
  70
  60
< 50
LJ
O
  40





  30





  20





 .10
.6  .8  I
                       3  4  S  6 7 8 IG
 20   30  40 50  70  100

EXPOSURE  HOURS
200
400 600   IOCO
                                         1-12

-------
              Figure 4.  The  lethal time  (LT50) for  fingerling  salmon
                         exposed to 56% Georgia Pacific mill effluent
                         as derived by semi static bioassays
                          (Tests G, H).
 _
 G.
  90



  80


  70


  60
 < SO
  30
  20
  to
     .6 .8  I
H:
  100
  90
                                                   40
                       3  4  5678 10
 20  30 40 SO  70  100
EXPOSURE HOURS
                                                                  200
                                      1 i
                                     u
400 600   lOOO
  ao
  70
  60
 < SO
 u
 o
  40
  3O
  20
  10
                                                        u
        .8 I
                       3  4 a s 7 a  10
  20   30 40 50  70  100     200
         MutmH
 40O  600   lOOO
                                        1-13

-------
             Figure 5.   The lethal time  (LT50)  for fingerling salmon

                         exposed to 56% Georgia Pacific mill effluent

                         as derived by semi static bioassays

                         (Tests If J).
I 100
.
90
80
70
60
3 50
ui
0
',0
3.0
20
10
0












.€























.8











1











;











» 2











» 4











5











€











. 7











6























K











>











2(











) 3











0 4(











3 5(











D











7







II
1
1
U
0











100











2











00











•4(











>0











6(











)0



































OC
J.
  100
  90





  80





  70





  60
< 50
ui
o
                                         EXPOSURE HOURS
  20
  10
     .6  .8  I
3  4 & 6 7 8 10
 20  30 40 SO  70  100

EXPOSURE HOURS
200
400 600   1000
                                        1-14

-------
           Figure 6.
A toxicity curve representing the median
survival  time of Atlantic salmon fingerlings at
any concentration of G-P  mill effluent  in a 96
hour bioassay at 14.5°C.
  100.

  «o.

  so.

  70.

  60.


  so*
CO
es.
H-  30.
_(
«t

>
a
=  3
   30
                          i    r   r"i  i
           10
                           20
              30
40
                                                J	1-
                                  111
50
70
100
                       GEORGIA-PACIFIC  EFFLUENT,*
                                     1-15

-------
            F
                   'Ur
 Plate 4.
Fingerling Salmo salar as removed from
100% and 56% Georgia-Pacific mill
effluent during semi-static bioassays.
          The LT50 values demonstrate the classical inverse
toxicity relationship between fish survival and pulp mill
effluent concentration i.e. as the effluent concentration
is halved, the median survival time of the Salmo salar
fingerlings is doubled.

          Figure 6 demonstrates the response pattern of
Atlantic salmon to concentrations of Georgia-Pacific mill
effluent.  This graph demonstrates that the G-P effluent is
not acutely toxic at 14% concentration or less.  This
concentration is referred to as the 96 hour LC50, and
represents that concentration of effluent which allows
50% of the fish to survive 96 hours.

          In the case of certain toxicants, the incipient
lethal, which is used to distinguish acute toxicity from
chronic responses, is essentially the same as the 96 hour
LC50.  There is no evidence to suggest that this is the
case for the G-P effluent.

          It should be pointed out that the Georgia-
Pacific pulp and paper mill was reported to be at 60%
production while EPA personnel collected samples for the
semi-static bioassays.

                           1-16

-------
           The classical nature of the results is also
demonstrated by the increase in slope of the LT50 lines
as concentrations go from high to lower levels.  The
assumption in this case is that in a sample of 10 fish,
the variability in sensitivity of the individual fish to
lower toxicant concentrations will create a greater range
of survival times.  This is generally shown in the LT50
graphs.  There are two possible modifying factors however;
one is that the lines drawn are only the best fit by eye,
the other is that in a hatchery stock such as the one used,
the size differences between the salmon is very small.  In
nature, due to a variety of stresses, one would expect size
differences of a sample of fish to be greater.

           When the continuous-flow tests were started, the
Georgia-Pacific mill was returning to 100% production.
The pulp mill personnel indicated that as the various mill
processes reached optimum operation losses would be reduced
with an expected reduction in toxicity.

Table VI.  Concentrations, percent survival and LT50 values
           of the continuous flow bioassays conducted with
           Georgia-Pacific mill effluent on August 12, 13
           and 15, 1972.
Concentration %
75
50
25
75
50
25
65
35
% Survival
0
0
0
0
,0
80
0
0
LT50 (hours)
8.2
12
18
20
27
-
17
27
         Figures 7 to 10 provide the graphical interpolations
of the LT50 values.

         The first series, as expected, produced significantly
lower LT50 values than those obtained in semi-static
bioassays.  It is not known, however, whether the start-up.
of the extra 40% production contributed to the increase  in
toxicity of samples collected 'on the night of August 11  and
morning of August 12 (see Figure 11).
                           1-17

-------
            Figure 7.  The  lethal time (LT50)  for fingerling salmon

                        exposed to 75%  Georgia  Pacific mill  effluent

                        in continuous  flow bioassays on August 12

                        and  13, 1972 respectively.
 100




  90





  80




  70





  60
o

Ul
o
  30
  20
  to
     .6  .8  I
 100
  90
  80
  70
  60
< 50
u
o
  40
  30
                      3  4  5  6 7 8 10
                    20   30  40 50  70  100

                  EXPOSURE  HOURS
                         200
                                                                         400  600   1000
  20
  10
     .6  .8  I
3  4 6 6 7 8  10
 20   30  40 50  70  KX)

EXPOSURE HOURS
200
400 600   1000
                                       1-18

-------
            Figure 8.  The lethal  time (LT50)  for
                        exposed to  50% Georgia-Pacific  ..— -r-=-~
                        in  continuous flow bioassays on August  12
                        and 13, 1972  respectively.
 100


  90


  80


  70


  60
< 50
kl
0
  40


  30


  20


  to
     .6  .8  I
3  4 5 6 7 8  IO
 100


  90


  80


  70


  60
                                           2O   3O 4O 5O  70  IOO
                                         EXPOSURE HOURS
                         200
      400  60O   IOOO
< so
  40


  30


  20


 .10
                                                              1
     .6 .8
   4  ft 6 7 8 K>
 20   30  40 50  70  JOO
EXPOSURE HOURS
200
400 600   IOOO
                                          1-19

-------
            Figure  9.   The lethal time  (LT50)  for fingerling salmon
                        exposed to 25% Georgia-Pacific mill  effluent
                        in continuous  flow bioassays on August 12 and
                        13, 1972 respectively.
 100



  90




  60



  70




  60
<
  40




  30




  20




  10
     .6  .6
                      3 4  5 6 7 6 IO
 20  30 40 SO  70  100

EXPOSURE HOURS
200
400  600   ICCO
100
90
80
70
60
JSO
i
'40
30
20
10






















.6




















.8










1



























































































2 346678










10




























































20 30 4O 5O 70



'





































'.

























I

i

1



*





1




— -1

100 200 400 600 iCOQ
o
4
U
O
                                     1-20

-------
             Figure 10.
   The lethal time  (LT50)  for  fingerling  salmon

   exposed to 65% and 35% G-P  mill effluent in

   continuous flow  bioassays on August  15,  1972,
 100




  90





  60




  70





  60
< 50
u
0
  30




  20




  10
     .6  .8  I
                      3  4  5  6 7 8 10
 100



  90




  eo



  70



  eo
                   20   30  40 50  70  100

                  EXPOSURE HOURS
                         200
      400  600
         ICOO
< 50
w
Q
  40
  30
  20
  10
                                               ll
                                                                                      I
     .6  .8  I
3  4 & 6 76  10
 20   30  40 SO  70  100

EXPOSURE HOURS
200
400 600   (000
                                       1-21

-------
           Figure 11.
A toxicity curve  representing the median
survival time of  Atlantic Salmon fingerlings a
a number of concentrations of G-P mill effluen
in a continuous-flow bioassay at 14.5°C.
O
S

Ul
o
Ul
                                                1111
                                                       70
                                       100
                      GEORGIA-PACIFIC  EFFLUENT.%
                                        1-22

-------
           Figure 12.   Graphical interpolation of the LT50 values for

                      the semi-static bioassays conducted with

                      yearling salmon at 56% and 32% effluent

                      concentrations respectively.
 too




 90





 80




 70




 60
                                                 I I
< 50
ui
o
 40




 30




 20




 to
    .6  .8  I
               2   3  45678  10
 100




 90





 80




 70





 60
< 50
m
o
  40





  30





  20





  10
                20  30  40 SO  70  100    200    400 600  IOOO

               .EXPOSURE  HOURS
                                                 I
                                                 I I
    .6  .8 I
3 4 S 6 7 8 10
20   30 40 50 70  100
                                                        200
                                                                .Ml
                                           400 600   IOOO
                                1-23

-------
            As suggested by G.P- mill personnel, a reduction
in toxicity did occur when the mill reached 100% production
but the toxic level was probably not raised many percentage
points beyond 25% effluent.  The basis for this conclusion
is three-fold:

1)  50% effluent kills 50% of the salmon in 28 hours and
    100% in 36 hours;

2)  yearling Salmo salar in 32% effluent died in 29 hours;

3)  preliminary static tests conducted in May, 1972 on
    Georgia-Pacific mill effluent indicated an LC50
    between 56% and 32%;

            Figure 12 demonstrates the LT50 values obtained
with yearling Salmo salar.  At 56% effluent 100% mortality
occurred within 15 hours while at a 32% concentration 100%
mortality required 33 hours.  This demonstrates a similar
relationship to that obtained in earlier semi-static bioassays
with fingerlings, i.e. an inverse relation between con-
centration and survival time.

            Studies by Courtright and Bond (1969) have shown
that foam produced by pulp and paper mill effluents con-
centrates resin acid by a factor of 5.  Since a recent
continuous-flow bioassay series run at the Physiological
Testing Laboratory demonstrated an LC50 of 0.6 mg/liter
(ppm) of abietic acid for Atlantic trout, I felt it would
be worthwhile to study the toxicity of the foam condensates.

            Fingerling Atlantic salmon placed in tanks
containing 10% foam condensate survived only 66 hours while
fish in 5% condensate survived 96 hours.

            One 5% foam condensate bioassay was conducted
at the Physiological Testing Laboratory with shrimp, Crangon
septemspinosa, in sea water to obtain some information on the
effect of the foam in the estuary.  Though there was 20%
mortality in the test tank versus no mortality in the control,
no definitive statement can be made, though Courtright and
Bond demonstrated the inhibition of normal development in
mussel embryos at 0.1% foam •
                            1-24

-------
    Table VII.   Analytical  results  for lignin and resin acid
                for some  samples  from the Georgia-Pacific survey.

    SOURCE	LIGNIN* (ppm)   RESIN ACID (ppm)

 1.  Holding tank-100%  effluent              312             5.6

 2.  Continuous  flow-50% effluent             567             4.6
 3.  St.  Croix River 120 yds upstream
                            RR Bridge
 4.  St.  Croix River 120 yds upstream                       <1
                            RR Bridge
 5.  St.  Croix River 500 yds below mill                      5.9
 6.  St.  Croix River 500 yds below mill                      6.2

 7.  Continuous flow-75% effluent            637             5.0
 8.  Holding tank-100% effluent              329             4.8

 9.  Continuous flow-75% effluent            274             4.8
10.  St.  Croix River water (control)
11.  St.  Croix River water (control)
12.  Continuous flow-50% effluent            194             2.1
13.  Foam (Baring,  Maine)                                   19.9


*  Lignin results  are the means of three readings.

          Lignin and resin acid analyses were requested by the
Physiological Testing Laboratory in an attempt to label some
of the toxic constituents of the G-P effluent.

          A recent study by our laboratory had lowered the LC50
of Lignosulfonates for rainbow trout from 1000 ppm to 225 ppm
in continuous-flow situations.  Previous work by other biologists
in EPS Atlantic Region had shown that 1000 ppm was also the
lethal threshold for salmon in static tests as had been reported
for rainbow trout.  It is expected that continuous-flow bioassays
with lignin and salmon would lower the LC50 to a similar level.
The lignin concentrations in 100% and 75% G-P effluent are
sufficient to kill juvenile rainbow trout and probably young
salmon.   In any event, they would contribute to the toxicity.

          The abnormally high lignin readings of 637 ppm and
567 ppm probably resulted from a slug of effluent with a
concentrated lignin content running through the system as the
samples were taken from different, tanks within seconds of each
other.

          The effluent from the mill and the  foam produced
contains toxic concentrations of resin acid.
                                1-25

-------
        The toxic components of kraft mill wastes are very
complex and variable.  Consequently, tests conducted with
the same concentrations of different mill samples may result
in different LC50 values.  This applies even when the same
species is used as test organism (Betts and Wilson, 1966;
Courtright and Bond, 1969).  This variability is important
not only in considering differences in mortality, as
demonstrated in our continuous-flow bioassays, but also
with the possibility that low kraft effluent levels in
pools may create lethal conditions whereas higher con-
centrations of the waste discharge with different compounds
may be non-toxic.

        Servizi et al, (1966) reported an average 4 day
LC50 of bleached kraft mill effluent for fingerling sockeye
salmon of 22% with a range of lethal concentrations from
12-43% effluent.

        Furthermore, Alderdice and Brett (1957) concluded that
neutralized bleached kraft mill effluent had a toxicity for
sockeye salmon  (Oncorhynchus nerka) similar to that reported
by Sprague and McLeese (1968) for Atlantic salmon.

        These results are consistent with those reported by
the Physiological Testing Laboratory for effluent from the
Georgia-Pacific mill.

        Avoidance studies are presently underway and suggest
that yearling Atlantic salmon would avoid effluent concentrations
in the range of 10-25%.  These levels are similar to those found
by Sprague and Drury (1969) with bleached kraft mill effluent.

Conclusions

1.  In semi-static 96 hour bioassays with fingerling
    Atlantic salmon, the LC50 is 14% mill effluent (60%
    production).

2.  In continuous flow bioassays with fingerling Atlantic
    salmon at 60% production, it does not appear that a
    non-toxic effluent can be reached.

3.  In continuous flow bioassays with fingerling Salmo salar
    at 100% production, a reasonable estimate of the LCBT5
    is 30% effluent.

4.  The LC50 for the foam condensate derived from the foaming
    of the efflunet as it mixes in river water lies between
    5 and 10%.

5.  Similar LT50 values are obtained with yearling Atlantic
    salmon as with fingerlings.
                             1-26

-------
6.  Lignin and resin acid are two of the toxic compounds
    present in Georgia-Pacific effluent.

        Some of the people directly and indirectly involved
are listed by way of acknowledgements for their able
assistance and advice.

Environmental Protection Service
    Dr. R. H. Cook - A/Head, Environmental Assessments
    R. P. Cote - Project Leader, Physiological Testing
    W. R. Parker - Senior Technician
    Ron Duggan - Toxicity Lab Assistant
    Gerald Myatt - Toxicity Lab Assistant
    Kenneth Doe - Toxicity Lab Assistant
    R. Crocker - Chemistry Technician

Environmental Protection Agency

    R. Thompson - Program Coordinator
    H. Davis - Microbiologist
    C. Corkin - Attorney
    G. Gardner - Histologist
    as well as many other members of their field staff.
                               1-27

-------
                        BIBLIOGRAPHY
Alderdice, D.F. and J. R. Brett. 1957.  Some effects of
   kraft mill effluent on young Pacific salmon.  J. Fish.
   Res. Bd. Canada, 14(5):  783-785.

Betts, J.L. and G.G. Wilson. 1966.  New methods for
   reducing the toxicity of kraft mill bleachery wastes
   to young salmon. J. Fish. Res. Bd. Can. 23:  813-824.

Cote, R. P. and W.R. Parker. 1972.  Two continuous-flow
   dilution systems for conducting aquatic toxicological
   studies. 'E.P.S. Manuscript Report No. 72-3.

Courtright, R.C. and C.E. Bond. 1969.  Potential toxicity
   of kraft mill effluent after oceanic discharge.  Prog.
   Fish. Cult.  31(4):  207-212.^

Servizi, J.A., E.T. Stone, and R.W. Gordon. 1966.  Toxicity
   and treatment of kraft pulp bleach plant waste. Inter.
   Pac. Salmon Fish. Comm. B.C. Progress Rept. No. 13.

Sprague, J.B. and D.W. McLeese. 1968.  Toxicity of kraft
   pulp mill effluent for larval and adult lobsters, and
   juvenile salmon. Water Res. 2:  753-760.

Sprague, J.B. and D.E. Drury. 1969.  Avoidance reactions of
   salmonid fish to representative pollutants.  Adv. in
   Water Pollut. Res. 4th Int. Conf. Prague.
                                 1-28

-------
APPENDIX J

-------
_^l t VM Oi ti I tOi *h OCki iC»dCi  HZ4 iVu O* II it/fiTjCt ih OOl iC**Jd
                                                Vowr //,e /offe ^•/e/ifr/'.cd


                                        i
                                                GJ/" /-fc- '^^/.'t; /'c-.v/'c-'.te
        Dr.  R.  H.  Cook,  Head
        Water  Surveillance Unit
 FRO.V.:       .     __ n _   _   .     _   n
 &E:    hugn ^..  nail,  Project reader
       Special  Studies
 bJrE-r: '  Caged-fish tests  on St.  Croix River August, 1972


              In  an attempt to evaluate the present condition of
        the  water in the  St. Croix River and the influence of waste
        discharge from the Georgia-Pacific Mill at Woodland , Maine
        on the river condition,  a series of caged-fish tests were
        run  in several locations in the river from August 1 to
        August 16, 1572.

        Test Series No. 1

              Wooden cages were constructed following the design
        descripted in the Environmental Protection Service Methods
        Manual.   The cage dimensions were 18" x 18" x 42".

              Finglering  Atlantic Salmon were supplied by the Fish
        Culture Station in Saint John, N. B.  The fish were transported
        by truck, with continuous aeration, to Woodland, Maine where
        they were acclimated to river water for approximately 12
        hours .

              Test locations were as follows  (see map) :

          1.  St. Croix River below Grand Falls Dam, Canadian
              side.  A control location.

          2.  Mohannas Stream.  A control location.

          3.  400 yds. below Georgia-Pacific Mill, above Baileyville
              sewage plant, -on U. S. side.

          4.  1.5 miles downstream from Baileyville sewage plant
              on  U. S. side.

          5.  Railway bridge at Baring, Maine,  (U. S.  side).

              Fine mesh screen was installed inside the cages .when  it
        was  discovered fingerlings could escape through the normal
        cage mesh.
                                                  August  29,    1072

-------
       Results of Run £1 were as follows:

Station #1

       -  10 salmon fingerlings placed in  cage at 1700,
          Aug. 9, 1972.
       -  all fish survived 96 hrs. in excellent condition,
       -  water temperature 20°C.   $>§*&
Station #2
          10 salmon fingerlings placed in cage at 1745,
          Aug. 9, 1972.
          all fish in excellent condition after 43 hrs.
          Site eliminated.            0
          water temerature 17°C.  ^- 6 f
Station £3
       -  10 salmon fingerlings'^ placed in cage at 2000,
          Aug. 9, 1972.
       -  100% mortality in less than 5 minutes.
       -  water temperature 35°C.
   b.  -  10 more salmon fingerlings added at 2010,
          Aug. 9, 1972.
       -  100% mortality in 30 seconds.
       -  water temperature 35°C.  fa**

   c.  -  10 more salmon fingerlings added at 2025,
          Aug. 9, 1972.
       -  100% mortality in 40 seconds.

   d.  -  10 more salmon fingerlings added at 0010,
          Aug. 10, 1972.
       -  100% mortality in 40 seconds.

       Temperatures above and below the pulp mill on the
U. S. side were then checked.

0730, 10/8/72.  Above Mill  20.5°C  Station #3  35.0°C
0830, 10/8/72.  Above Mill  20.0°C  Station #3  35.0°C
0630, 11/8/72.  Above Mill  20.QOC  Station #3  34.QOC

Station #4

       -  10 salmon fingerlings placed in cages in the
          river at 1400, 10/8/72.
       -  40% mortality  10 hr. 20 min.
          100% mortality 16 hr. 30 min.
       -  water temperature 21°C.
                        J-2

-------
Station #5

          10 salmon fingerlings placed in river at 1930,
          S/8/72.

       Mortality (%)                  Exposure Time (hrs . )

            10                               30.5
            20                               40.25
            30                               41.75
            40                               48.0
            60                               53.0
            70                               62.0
            80                               65.0
            90                               69.5
           100                               76.0

       A new series of cagad-fish tests were run during
August 14-18, 1972.  For these tests Atlantic Salmon
yearlings were used.  They were supplied by the Saint John
Fish Culture Station.  These fish were treated in a simils
manner to the fingerlings of the week previous.  For these
tesus Station f2 was not used.

Statio'n #
       This test had been in operation for 51.5 hours when
at 1230, 17/8/72 the cage was found out of the water.  It
had been left high and dry when the gates at the dam were
closed thereby decreasing the volume of water below the dam.
It is estimated that the fish had been out of the water
1 to 2 hours.  All fish were in excellent condition prior
to the decrease of flow.  '

       Water temperature average 22.0°C.

Station 13

       -  10 salmon yearlings added to the cage at 0920,
          15/8/72.
       -  100% mortality in 40 seconds.
       -  water temperature that day averaged 37.0^C.

Station £
       -  10 salmon yearlings added to the cage at 2400,
          14/8/72 (0000, 15/8/72)
                       J-3

-------
       Xortc:lity (%)                  Exposure time  Chrs.

           10                                  45.5
           ',0           ~s                      48. C
           50                                  70.5
          100                                  30.5
  a.  -  10 salmon yearlings placed in the cage
         at 1130, 15/8/72.
      -  100% mortality in 12.0 hrs.

  b.  -  10 salmon yearlings placed in cage at 0030,
         16/8/72
      -  100% mortality in 11.5 hrs.

      -  watar temera-cure in a. and b. 24°C.   «•** '^'
           the tests cor-ducted in the St. Croix River
at Station £1 (control station) it can be seen that water
at this location is non-toxic.  Tests at the second control
location  (Station #2} , although of limited duration,
confirmed the suspicion that this stream continues to be
suitable for fish.  Mohannas Stream has been used several
times in previous years as a control location when testing
the St. Croix River toxicity.

      Station #3 showed rapid and total mortality.  How-
ever, it is not possible to distinguish between toxicity
resulting from chemical pulp mill effluent and death due
to heat shock.  Brett  (1956) suggests that Salmonidae
have a low thermal tolerance with maximum upper lethal
temperatures barely exceeding 25.0°C.1^ Alabaster  (1967)
testing salmon  (Salmo solar L.) and trout  (Salmo trutta L.)
in the River Axe established the lethal temperature of
smolts and parr at between 23.9 and 2v6.0°C. while Bishai
(1960) established that Salmo solar alevins die if subjected
to temperatures above 25°C.  Since the water temperature
at Station #3 was between 34°C and 37OC during the tests,
heat death could mask any effluent chemical toxicity.

      Station #4, although 1.5 miles downstream of the
pulp mill indicated severe toxicity.  Yearling salmon lived
no more than 12.0 hours.  Temperature was not a limiting
factor at this station downstream of the pulpmill.
                        J-4

-------
      Station #5, which is some 3 miles downstream of
the pulp mill produced mortalities of 100% in 76 hours with
fingerling salmon and in 80.5 hours with the larger
(yearling) salmon.  Again, temperature was not a limiting
factor here.
References Cited

1.  Alabaster, J. S. 19S7.  The survival of salmon
      (S.almo solar L.) and sea trout (Salmo tvutta L.)
      in fresh and saline water at high temperature.   Water
      Research 1(10), 717-730.

2.  Bishai, H. M. 1960.  Upper lethal temperatures for
      larval salmonids.  J. Cons. perm. int. Explor.  Mer.
      25(2), 129-133.

3.  Brett, J. R. 1956.  Some principles in the thermal
      requirements of fishes.  Rev. Biol. 31(2), 75-87.
                                  ''
                              Hugh A.  Hall
                              Project Leader
                              Special Studies
HAHrjy
                     J-5

-------
                      ST. CROIX RIVER
                           0  1   2  3 mi.
                            ®) STATION
WOODLAND
                         ST. STEPHEN
                           CALAU
                        :BARINGI
                                                        FIGURE Jl

-------
APPENDIX K

-------
                         ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
REPLY TO
 ATTNOF:
 SUBJECT:
George R. Gardner
Research Aquatic Biologist, NMWQL

Environmental Protection Agency vs Georgia Pacific
DATE: October  20,  1972
TO:
"Director, NMWQL
          One hundred seventy eight Atlantic Salmon (Salmo salar) submitted to
          the National Marine Water Quality Laboratory, Technical Operations
          Branch, by Dr. Raymond Cot& representing the Canadian Environmental
          Protection Service were recieved and recorded on the 16th of August,
          1972.   The specimens consisted of previously frozen and fresh year-
          ling and fingerling salnon.   These fishes were immediately fixed in
          Dietrich's Fixative upon receipt; the yearlings were trimmed of excess
          tissues at the time to insure proper fixation.

          All specimens were processed in accordance with routine clinical
          methods adopted by the NMWQL, and stained with Harris1 Heinatoxylin
          and Eosin for histopathological elimination.   The results of the
          examination are as follows:

          Gross Anatomy;

          No gross lesions were evident at autopsy.

          Microscopic Anatomy:

          Lesions were present in the olfactory organs of both fingerling and
          yearling salmon.   Morphological alterations were associated with the
          basal, neurosensory, and sustentacular cells of the chemoreceptive
          sites; in some instances the epithelium comprising the lining of the
          olfactory pits nas affected.   Cytolysis of the above cellular elements
          was indicated by various degrees of nuclear and cytoplasmic degenera-
          tion.   Due to the mature of the alteration, the lesions appeared to
          have origin near the barement membrane.   The nuclei of altered cells
          had increased basophilia, chromatin condensed near the nuclear mem-
          brane, were pyknotic, and finally karyorrhexsis (rupture of the nuc-
          lear membrane and fragmentation of the chromatin) had occured.   The
          cytoplasmic ratio.was generally reduced and was either clear  or lack-
          ing in severly afflicted cells.

          Migration of sensory cell nuclei from their usual basal to an apical
          position followed the initial cellular changes near the basement mem-
          brane.   Normally the apicaJ portions of sensory cells are free of
          nuclei and form a marginal  "zone of cytoplasm".   The marginal  zone
          of' cytoplasm was reduced or eliminated in exposed fishes having severe
          lesions, due to migration of the nuclei into the apical area  of  the
          cells.   Mucous cells usually present in the marginal  zone of cyto-
          plasm were lacking.
     EPA Form 1330-6 (11-71)
                                K-l

-------
Lesions were found in the intestine of some fishes; they were remin-
escent of cadmium poisoning in the estuarine teleost Fundulus
heteroclitus-.-   However, the lesion was inconsistant.   There were
no lesions associated with other major tissues, including the res-
piratory epithelium.

Conclusions;

A table is included in the report to represent the NMWQL pathology
numbers as recorded, the treatments, and the exposure groups having
the lesion.   Salmon exposed for periods of 20 hr or more were usu-
ally severly affected (ex- 32% G.P. effluent; 26.5 hr) (Figures).
Cellular alterations would not be expected to occur after exposures
to high concentrations that were rapidly lethal (ex- 40 second sur-
vival at station #4).   Rapid death of an organism does not permit
enzymatic changes to occur in cells that will allow recognition of
their death by the light microscope.   This may explain the absence
of lesions in some groups.   Approximately 49% of the specimens were
of no value in the evaluation due to autolytic or post mortem change.
These changes occured as the result of improper preservation prior
to procurement by the NMWQL.

The prime function of the chemoreceptive organs are to convey infor-
mation concerning changes in the chemical composition of the internal
and external environment to the higher centers of the central nervous
system for correlation.   These sensory imputs allow the organism to
alter behavioral patterns by adjusting their internal physiological
or biochemical mechanisms to cope with a changing environment.   Chem6-
reception in the salmon is vital to their orientation and migration
into "home Streams", and therefore, is vital to successful repro-
duction and propagation of the species.

Recent investigations have reported the occurence of lesions in the
olfactory organs of other marine teleosts of both an experimental and
a spontaneous character (Gardner and LaRoche, 1973 a, b) .   The exper-
imentally induced lesions in the above instances were caused by cer-
tain heavy metals, a^pesticide, and a whole crude oil and the soluble
and insoluble fractions of th=> crude oil.   There preliminary invest-
igations have indicated the characteristics of lesions in the olfact-
ory organs to vary dependant upon the t-ype of toxicant exposure.
Plausibly, these changes in the olfactory organ may in time lend
themselves to categorization.   Research to date has shown the sensory
system of the teleost to be very vulnerable to a variety of water poll-
utants, a fact which has been further substantiated by the effects of
pulp mill effluents in the present case.

a) Gardner. G.R. and G. LaRoche. 1973.  Copper induced lesions in
   estuarine teleosts.   J. Fish. Res. Bd. Canada  (In Press).
b) Gardner,.:G.R. and G. LaRoche. 1973.  Chemically induced lesions
   in estuarine or marine teleosts.  Presented at Armed Forces .Institute
   of Pathology, Fish Pathology Symposium, Aug. 6-8, 1972. (In Press).
                                            George R. Gardner

                           K-2

-------
       TECHNICAL OPERATIONS BRANCH
NATIONAL MARINE WATER QUALITY LABORATORY
•ft1"2 Fingerling
athology Yearli (
umbers ° J
(838-3844
1845-3854
1855-3858
1859-3862
1863
1864-3871
B72-3878
879-3884
885-3890
891-3892
893-3894
895-3912
J13-3916
U7
119
J20-3928
J29-3937
938-3953
J54-3963
964-3966
967
968
969-3976
977-3980
981-3985
986-3995
996-4000
001-4008
009-4013
014-4015
)IAL
y
y
f
y
y
f
f
f
f
f
f
f
f
f
f
f
f
f
y
f
f
y
y
f
?
y
y
y
y
y
y
*
,f. Exposure Data
5 Tank # or
' Station #
Cont flow (1760 hr)
Tank #9
Tank #2
Tank #2
Tank #3
Tank #10
Tank #10
• Tank #11
Tank #11
Tank #11
Tank #11
Tank #12
	
	
	
	
	
	
Sta. #1
Sta. #1
Sta. #3
Tank #3
Sta. #3
Sta. #3
Sta. #3
Sta. #4
Sta. #5
Sta. #5
Sta. #5
Sta. #5
Treatment
Control
Control - river H20
75% G.P. eff.
32% G.P. eff. 26.5 hr
56% G.P. eff.
25% eff.
25% eff.
35% eff.
50%'
32% 25 hrs
50%
75%
50%
25% eff. 75 hrs
35% eff. 29 hrs
62% eff. 20 hrs
5% foam cone.
10% foam 66 hrs
Control
Control
Control
70 hrs
56% eff.
Baring
Baring
Dead or moribund
40 sec.
12 hr dead
7.5 hr dead
12 hr dead
11.5 hr moribund
„ , PM L
Number pogt Mortem Leslon
Animals Change Present
7
10
4
4
1
8
7
6
6
2
2
18
4
1
1
1
9
9
16
10
3
1
1
8
4
5
10
5
8 .
5
2
178
PM
-
PM
-
PM
-
PM
-
PM
-
PM
PM
PM
-
-
-
-
PM
-
-
PM
PM
—
—
PM
PM
PM
PM
"
-
-
-
L
-
-
-
L
-
L
-
-
-
L
L
L
-
-
-
-
—
-
-
. .. _
—
1+(L)
_
_
.
•.
L
                  K-3

-------
                                    >.--i   .,»!•<" ••«•.'.•  •   •••
                                    . -v ---"(-t't -•" V* *•'• ^ - -'
                                   •!'.?. v- =."»  »  ^ »^* •'-"•  . \

                                      •"         '            -
                                                                             CONTROl

                                                                             (X 156)
                                                                             32% G.P.

                                                                             Effluent

                                                                             26.5 hr

                                                                          j   (X 156)
#*•
W'*
/iiU.<
  ^'•••tt.-^y   .-
_f.~   V^%  v
                   :s  i.
 •.•*. .-  «-

<•>-'."•'
*-. ^-.
                                         K-4

-------
                                                          CO.mOL (X 625)
                                                          M-niuco«a
                                                          SM-»ub«ucosa
                                                          BM-ba«enent
                                                            nwiabrane
                                                          NS-n«uroscnaory
                                                          ZOkonc of
                                                            cytoplasm
                                                          NOmucous cell
£ •? :->•« -^ -A  »*.
&•*••-*£'
fto - »-..,   ajjiSt.«*£.»
                                                         32ZG.P.
                              K-5

-------
APPENDIX  L

-------
                      ST. CROIX RIVER STUDY
                          AUGUST 1972

                DEVELOPMENT OF A DO DEFICIT MODEL
                     FOR THE ST. CROIX RIVER
                   WOODLAND - MiLLTOWN, MAINE
     The St. Croix River between the Georgia-Pacific effluent and

Militown Bridge was modeled for biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) and

dissolved oxygen (DO) response under specified sets of conditions.

     Modeling a river may be a physical or analytical process.

EPA chose to employ the analytical approach.  This is based on mathe-

matical formulations of the physical, chemical and biological phenomena

occurring in the system and may be summarized simply as:

     1.  The quantity of material entering a system is equal to the

         amount leaving plus the amount lost by various processes,

         plus the buildup of the material in that system.

     2.  Organic pollution, measured in terms of BOD, is oxidized at

         a rate proportional to its quantity.

     3.  Dissolved oxygen is added to a system by natural processes of

         reaeration in proportion to its deficit from saturation.

     As a result of the modeling program, we can expect the response of

the St. Croix River to be as shown in Figure 1  for all combinations of

input variables.  This shows the maximum deficit in the river as  a function

of the various environmental and imposed conditions.

     One of the runs has been extracted and illustrated fully for DO and

BOD as a function of river distance.  This was done for a flow of 1000 cfs,

a load of 8680 pounds per day, a benthic demand of 3 gm 02/m2/day, and a

deoxygenation rate of 0.3/day (see Figure 2).
                              L-l

-------
     A detailed description of the model, calibration and application

will now be discussed.

     The reliability of the results are subject to some question in terms

of data available and modeling techniques, but the analysis was undertaken

with  the intention of obtaining meaningful results and filling in data

gaps with the best engineering analysis we could employ.  The problems

inherent in any modeling endeavor arise from the following:

     1.  Range   of values for dissolved oxygen and BOD were recordprf

         at high flow.  Ranges of parameters must be selected to represent

         the system at all flows.

     2.  Some parameters have more significant economic impact than

         others in terms of treatment requirements.  These significant

         parameters have been analyzed and their values narrowed to a

         small range of probable and representative values.

     3.  The BOD - DO interaction model used has historically been

         accepted as the basis for economic decisions, although analysts

         realize the actual system is more complex.

     4.  A closed form solution of the system is not available, so we

         rely on discrete segmentation.

     Formalizing the equations to make the concepts compatible with a

computing scheme we obtain:

     Vk /Cfc - r [Qkj 0* kj Ck + 0kj Cj) + E'kj (Cj - Ck)] - VkCkKk + Wk
        v ^    J

     where k is an element under consideration

     J  is any contiguous element

                              L-2

-------
            ST. CROIX RIVER STUDY
                  AUGUST 1972

PROJECTED DISSOLVED OXYGEN CONCENTRATIONS
             AT MILLTOWN BRIDGE

       ( Water Temperature - 25 C )









FIGURE L-
H*


- ^^
5,000
2 3
5.0 5.0
0.3 0.2
59 51




1
5.0
0.2 0.3
480 River Flow 7
^-"*""' """"^-^ Cfa J—— -""""
10,000 15,000 Plajt,,i;nad 10,000
12313 Benthic Load 234
, gm 02/m^/day
en en en en en DO at Woodland 'e/i e/\ en * t\ f n
5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 ^ mg/1 5.0 5.0 6.0 5.0 6.0
0.3 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.2 Reaction Rate Q>2 Q Q
days •*•
Bridge, mg/1

1,000 	
8,680 10,000
3 5 34
6.0 5.0 6.0 5.0 6.0 5.0 6.0 5.0 6.0
0.2 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3
50
19,200
234
5.0 5.0 6.0 5.0 6.0
0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3
4.7 4.1 3.3 3.1 2.7 2.8

River Flow
cfs
19 200 Plant Load
-i- __ rr^ BOP-
3 4 Benthic Load
gm 02/ic2/day
5.0 6.0 5.0 6.0 D0 at Woodlan
Dam, mg/1
0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 Reaction Rate
days~l
4.9 5.1 4.3 4.5 D0 at Milltow
                                                                                 Bridge, mg/1

-------
    3.0-
    2.5-
 in
o
s
    2.0-
 DAM-0
    7.0-1
G  6>5~
e
m
CM
    6.0-
    5.5-
DAM—0
                   LOAD = 8680 ppd BOD5


                      B= 3gm./m2/doy


                      K = 0.3 day'1


                   D.O. deficit over dam- 14000ppd

                       based on a deficit of 3mg/l

                       over dam.


                      0 = 1000 cfs
                              BARING R.R. BRIDGE
                             MILLTOWN BRIDGE
                   100
  200          300


STATION (ft. xlOO)
400
500
                              BARING R.R. BRIDGE
                                                          MILLTOWN BRIDGE
                  100
  200         300

 STATION  (ft. xlOO)
400
500
            TYPICAL  RESULT  OF A MODEL  RUN
                                                               FIGURE  L2

-------
    V is the volume of the element

    C is BOD concentration (or any other substance subject  to
      first order kinetics)

    E' is the effective diffusion coefficient

    k is the first order decay rate of the material under
      consideration

    W is the input (or release of waste matter)

     <* , p are weighting terms , such that PC + p = 1

    Qkj is flow from j to k

The equation says, in words, "the change in the amount of material  in

section k [V^yc^] is equal to the sum of all the material  entering by
advection [XQ^i C00 ^4 ck "*" Pkj C1^ where oc and p define  the  relative

weight each section contributes, plus the sum of the the  material  entering

by diffusion [•?£',   (C. - Cu ) ] plus the input waste [W^J , minus  the  mass
              j  KJ   J
destroyed by decay or utilization  [V^ K^ C^] .

    Rewriting for a steady state case, where no temporal  concentrations

change exists we obtain:
wk * ck If ^kjQkj + E'kj> 4         A
         J                            j
    Allowing a,, to be the coefficient of C^, and a^j  the  coefficient of C..,

We can simplify by writing W. » akk^k + ^ akl *M •

    Note that the equations in this form lend themselves to  a  matrix

formulation, namely:  (W) =  [A] (C)

where (W) represents the known vector of waste  inputs,  [A] represents the

known matrix of coefficients as shown above, and  (C)  represents the vector

of concentrations for each segment.

    The resulting systems can be solved as   (C) =  [A]    (W), however
                              L-3

-------
cumbersome the matrix inversion happens  to be.


     There are, however, methods available which ease  this  computation.


The model  uses a relaxation  technique which  converges quite  rapidly.


     At a boundary the equation takes the form


Wk - f [Qkj  <~kjCl + pkj Ck) + E'kj  (Ck - Cj)] + VkKkCk +  E'kk  (Ck  -  Cb)
where C,  represents the concentration of material  at  the  boundary


     In order to retain the standard form, we must redefine  the


follov/ing terms at boundary segments:


     Hew V^  = Wh + Cb (K'kk - Q


     New akk - akk

     Hew a
     so that


     wk -

Note:  the boundary conditions were incorporated in such a way  as  to


be made a part of the source load vector.


     The deficit solution takes on the same form as the above,  except  a


deficit coefficient (kj) is substituted for "k", (assuming both BOD and


DO deficit decay by a first order reaction) , and the  term V^K^L^  is added


to the deficit loadings to account for the oxygen uptake of  the BOD removal


process.  Also considered are bent hie uptakes S^V^/H.  where  S is the rate

          f\
in pm 02 /m /day and Vk/Hk represents the area under consideration, and


(Vk) (Pk) the deficit (positive or negative) arising  from photosynthetic


effects.
                              L-A

-------
W
     akk
                     akj Dj - VkkkCk + Vk
                                            -
     Because the BOD and deficit solutions have similar formulations,

there is one main program to solve both.  The flow chart of this program

is illustrated below.
     Start
  FDSA or FDSOP
reads in values for
physical conditions
       optional
     FDSAA
reads in revisions of
above values
                                   FDSA2
                                reads in boundary
                                conditions
                                   FDSB
                                sets up "A" matrix
FDSC
reads in loadings


FDSD
solves "A" matrix


FDSE
outputs data

                                                                done j
                                   recycles for deficit run

More specifically the following data is needed for each subroutine:

FDSA:

     TITLE, any 80 characters

     N, number of segments

     SCALE, scaling factors for area, dispersion, flow and length,
     respectively.

         ICOL:  contiguous segment number, (up to six per segment
         including a^k* e^, Q.,  at end points of model)
                       2
         A:  area in ft

         E:  dispersion in mi2/day (E1 = AE)
                                          L

         Q:  flow in cfs

         L:  length in feet
         *                      •%
         VOL:  volume in million cubic feet for each segment.

     Note:  lengths need not be a representative side of the polygonal
     segment, as its only application is in computation of the  E1  values
                              L-5

-------
FDSA2;

     NUMB:  number of segments having boundary conditions

     BC, I COL:  the boundary value and corresponding segment.

FDSC;

     LOAD, ISEC:  the waste or deficit load in pounds per day and
     corresponding segment number.

     k:  the array of reaction coefficients for segments, (values in
      €; the degree of accuracy of the numerical solution desired

     OMEGA: (jJ , the relaxation factor for the iteration scheme of
     matrix solution.  lSU/^2, with one value in particular giving
     an optimal convergence pattern.

     FL:  the ratio of BOD to BOD5.  This should be (l-e"5^!)'1
     according to our assumption of first order kinetics, but since
     k varies throughout, and only one FL is desired, a reasonable
     value must be selected.

     Note:  Although ultimate BOD decays at a constant rate k, it
     can be shown that the 5-day BOD decays at the same rate.  By
     definition, the oxygen utilized in stabilizing the organic matter
     per day must be (k) (BOD5) (FL) (VOL)

     H, depth of segment, (feet) used in calculating bottom areas
     only, so need not be accurate physically, as long as

                     Hi=VOLi/AREAi

     Note:  area of bottom not input directly

FDSE:

     k:  reaction coefficients, days' , for deficit kinetics.

     P:  net oxygen transfer to water from phytoplankton, mg/l/day.
                                       2
     S:  benthic oxygen uptake, gm Oo/m /day.
                              L-6

-------
IIAIH PROGRAM




     A set of data switch settings which determine the formats and




presentation of output data will not be discussed here.




     A sample, annotated input and output is illustrated:




     Schematically, this represents the system of four sections as shown




along with the results for BOD and deficit concentrations  (See Figure 3).




     The analyst must be aware of the time span and frequency over which




the field data was collected and how these data fit into the concept of




the steady-state.  Long tern records can sometimes reflect seasonal trends.




Their use will often average out irregular conditions and provide good




results when compared to mathematical formulae.  Short term records require




a higher intensity survey at many points such as that run on the St. Croix




River in August 1972.  The analyst must be aware of these data and be able




to make appropriate adjustments when calibrating and analyzing the system




under various conditions.




     Another (purely academic) consideration when modeling is to be aware




of the "black box" concept.  Once the model is assembled and ready, the




user must not forget the physical realities of the system.  He simply




inputs a source load vector and obtains a concentration vector output in




a matter of seconds and, perhaps, feels that the computer has done the




simulation.  It is imperative to keep in mind that the sole reason a




computer is used at all is because the user does not like  to invert large




matrices by hand.
                              L-7

-------
              Application of Model to the St. Croix River


     The sampling survey conducted by the Environmental Protection Agency


in August 1972 was the main source of the initial data used in the model.


Along with aerial photographs^, USGS maps, Corps of Engineers cross-


sections and former reports-*>  , the maximum amount of data was compiled.


     Because the Corps of Engineers cross-section study was conducted at


flows lower than those of the  survey, a backwater analysis was performed


to determine water depths at the time of the survey.  The river was divided


in two separate reaches:  the  pooled reach from the rapids below Baring


Bridge to the rapids below Milltown Bridge, and the faster flowing, more


turbulent reach from the Georgia-Pacific effluent discharge downstream to



the rapids downstream from the railroad bridge at Baring.


     In order to compute river depths at low flows, approximations to


Manning's (n) were computed based on energy loss considerations.  Elevations


in the lower reach did not change significantly, but those in the upper



reach exhibited typical backwater profile characteristics.


     The assumptions relied upon in the backwater analysis were:



1.  Manning's Equation    (Q - 1*^9 K3 S & A)     is valid for the steady-
                                n



state conditions where S is the slope of the total energy line, R is


hydraulic radius, A is cross-sectional area;  2.  Total energy was the


elevation of the water surface (the velocity head V /2g was found to be


negligible in comparison);  3.  Control points exist at the rapids de-


fining the downstream end of each major reach.  R, the hydraulic radius,



was taken as cross-sectional area divided by top width, except in deep



narrow sections below Baring Bridge.




                              L-8

-------
1
SCHEMATICALLY THIS REPRESENTS A SYSTEM AS SHOWN:
1
3
2
4
0.8 0.6
I
4C
0.9
10
1.0
i.O
0.8
5.0
1.0
1001 90,
1
\
10
90 I
1
\
10
1
1
X
100,
i
X
1
f80 tilO
0.01 O.OI
0.01
0.01
0.1
0.01
O.I
0.01
SEGMENT NO.
AREA,IOOOft2
FLOW, cfs
DISPERSION
COEFFICIENT
Mi2/day
.25
1.5
.30
1.0
.25
1.5
.30
1.0

0.5
1.0
0.6
1.0

!
500
1
1
1000
1
t
500
\
1000
1
9.28 18.56 -
2000
X

/ 2000,

ki days'1
kz days'1
VOLUME, IO6cu.ft.
LENGTH, ft.
^BOD BOUNDARY
CONDITIONS, mg/l
DEFICIT IMPUTS,
pounds/day
RESULTS OF MODEL ON HYPOTHETICAL DATA
12.4
M. 1
*
13.7
11.3
BOD
mg/l
^
3.2
2.8
3.3
2.6
D.O DEFICIT
mg/l
TYPICAL SCHEMATIC REPRESENTATION
TWO DEMENTIONAL RIVER MODEL
FIGURE L3

-------
     A calculated water-surface elevation profile is shown in Figure A.

The station used are the same as in the Corps of Engineers report.

     Figures 5-10 are schematics of the river which represents the physical

conditions observed on the survey.  Although the numbering sequence is

out of order, this raises no problem in our computing scheme.  The two

segments (29 & 30) were appended at a later stage of this development to

facilitate input loadings of waste and deficit.

     The hydraulics of the river represent a highly complicated system

which can not be expressed exactly.  Lacking a large number of available

cross-sections and velocity profiles, the flow distribution at any given

station was approximated.  For this reason, no islands are shown in the

schematic.  Where they do exist, they have been "placed" on the interface

of two adjoining segments, and flows, cross-sectional areas and dispersion

coefficients have been adjusted accordingly.

     The more difficult problem at this point arose in the assignment of the

interfacial dispersion factors and flows.  There is no way to know whether

a particular phenomena is the result of a flow (net transfer of water) or a

dispersive process (random turbulent mixing), and moreover, it is not

required to be known in such an analysis.  Values were assigned such that a

reasonable representation of the system was simulated.  This was accomplish-

ed in the following manner:

     1.  Volume, area, depth were assigned to each section.

     2.  Flow rates were assigned and distributed.

     3.  Dispersion rates were assigned similarly.

     4.  An."artificial dye" was injected at the upstream sections
         of the model, and an arbitrarily high and uniform decay rate


                              L-9

-------
         was attributed  to each section.  The  ratio  of mass  rate  (Ibs/
         day) at selected points was used to verify  for  time of travel
         accuracy  (Wa/Wb«r < ~kt, where  "k" was  the decay  rate,  and "T"
         the time  of  travel, and "W" the mass  rate at "a" or "b").

     5.  From another independent, one-dimensional program,  values  of

         k-rates for various points in  the  river were used to  verify the

         first order decay model.  The  input data were taken from the

         survey records, and data from  the  latter part of the  week  were

         used to give a  better insight  into the processes.   A  background

         input BOD of 1.2 mg/1 and a waste  load of 54,000 pounds  per day

         in the effluent, along with the above-computed  K,A,E,Q values

         gave results compatable with survey-time data.

     6.  Verification of the deficit model  involved  the  use  of the  Dobbins-

         0'Conner  formula for the reaeration coefficient which states "kj

                                      I")             —"\lJ
         is proportional to (velocity)7  and (depth)  '.  Net oxygen

         transfer by photosynthesis was taken  as zero, and bottom demand
                               f\
         as a uniform 4  gra 02/m /day.  With an input dissolved oxygen

         deficit of 37,000 Ibs/day (2.7 mg/1)  in the main region  of the

         stream (section 29) and 350 Ibs/day in the  effluent stream (section

         30), we felt that a reasonable model  of deficits had  been  estab-

         lished .

     These results are summarized in Figure 10.

     At this point we have assembled the "A" matrices such that at  survey

time they represent the  observed conditions for our  "n"  segments.   Examining

this more closely, we note that we have "n  " terms to be found but  only

"n" equations.  This leaves us n(n-l) degrees  of freedom, or possible

combinations of parameters which satisfy the system.  For this reason


                             L-10

-------
    1001
    90'
  Ir-
  UJ
  UJ
  U.
    70'
    60
WOODLAND
  DAM
                        BAHIMO M.M. •MIDOC
                too
 200       300

STATION (ft. a 100}
                                             MILLTOWN BMIDCC
400
500
               CALCULATED  WATER  SURFACE
            ELEVATION  PROFILE AT  2500 CFS
                                                   FIGURE L4

-------
GEORGIA
PACIFIC
EFFLUENT
  BRIDGE*
  in
  UJ
  I-
  cn

"•IT











5 R.R-
Ei i
1 T











-30



29

3

6
9
12
2


5

8


1


14
	 _JX-< 	
1


4

7


10

13

+ 	 -16 — —

19
21
23
25
27
— 	 -15 	 	


18


20


22


24


26

28

20

70

MO
1 1 V/
160

2IO
bIW
26O
	 — 1
280

300

330

370

420

AfiO
•f Ow
inn
                           DOWNSTREAM
                                                       WOODLAND
                                                           DAM
      o
      <
      z
                                        STATION (ft. xlOO)
J
               SECTION  AND  STATION  NUMBERS
                                                       FIGURE  L5

-------
GEORGIA
EFFLUENT
BARING R.R.
BRIDGE* 	 >-
V)
Ul
^-
\-
V)
o
Ul
z
5O
i

f
____^_^SJ
°45O
fc^*'v WOODLAND
1

* 2(>6 ^ 2(
X
1 / 1 \
* 5) * 5
* ic6 * 2(
I i
T
^ "0

>0
-•XS.XX. ^^.xs.
___}___ ^i_ 	 i—
innn °RO ^co
i t




1
• AC- A

l&B%XV^
1
' -.
ww
_^ 	 4, 	 	
e*r\r\
i^%f XN
*
*

1
1
rk^\
DOWNSTREAM
^
INTERFACIAL FLOWS, CFS
	 1
o
z
o
FIGURE L6

-------
GEORGIA
PACIFIC
EFFLUENT
 BARING R.R
 BRIDGE
  v>
  uj
  \-
  0
  UJ
                          DOWNSTREAM
                                                     WOODLAND
                                                         DAM
      VERTICAL  CROSS  SECTIONAL AREAS, 100 FT.2
                                                          o
                                                     FIGURE L7

-------
GEORGIA
EFFLUENT
BARING R.R.
BRIDGE' 	 •-
tn
UJ
H-
o
UJ
Z
0ni 001 	
WOODLAND

o 01 o 01 o 01
0 01 0.
nni nni
0, 01 0
OOI OOI
OOI 0.
GOI O Ol
0, 01 0.
0IO O IO i ^ ir>
0,
01
r\ e^
. 	 , 	 a 10 — . 	 •— t
OOI QOI rkrkl
0.
Goi „.. 	
0.
Goi 	
0.
001
0.
OOI
0,
OOI
0
0
0
0
10
f\r\t
O Ol
01
01
OOI
01
O Ol
01
OOI

9- 	 • 	 	
O Ol
9OI
©Ol
©Ol
©Ol
O Ol

,-
i
o
Z
o
^0 m^^ 9
DOWNSTREAM
* ^
*
DISPERSION COEFFICIENTS, Ml2/ DAY
FIGURE L8

-------
GEORGIA
EFFLUENT
BARING R.R-
BRIDGE' 	 •-
CO
UJ
1-
<
1-
CO
0
UJ
H
z
r>
WOODLAND



333
.5 3.75 1.5
333
.2 3.0 1.2
444
3.0 3.0 3.0
444
3.0 3.0 3.0
4
6.0
4 '
0.8 0,
4
2.4
5
9.0
5
10.0
8
10.0
8
8.0
4
4.0
* 4
,8 0.8
4
2.4
5
9.0
5
10.0
8
10.0
8
8.0
8
14.0
i
<
0
<
z
<
u
DOWNSTREAM
DEPTH (ft) - 0
VOLUME (I06 ft.)- 0.0
SECTIONAL DEPTHS AND VOLUMES
FIGURE L9

-------
54000 pp<
350 pp
GEORGIA
EFFLUENT
BARING R.R-
BRIDGE' 	 •-
t/>
Ul
i-
<
H

O
UJ
H
Z
I)
-j 	
d-.
1 '
i t

WOODLAND
16000 ppd (l.2mg/l)
37000 ppd (2.7mg/l)
18.6 1.3
2.7 2.7
13.8 1.3
2.7 2.6
12.8 1.4
2.8 2.6
12.5 2.3
2.9 2.6
8.1
2.8

7.7 3.1
"~O" "* 2.6
€.5
2.8
6.0
3.0
5.6
3.1
5.2
3.3
4.9
3.4

1.2
2.7
1.2
2.6
1.2
2.5
1.2
2.5
1.9
2.5
_^ 	 ££ 	 >-
2.5
3.1
2.6
3.4
2.8
3.5
2.9
3.7
3.1
3.8
3.2
4.2
3.4
, 	 1
<
o
4
Z
<
O
DOWNSTREAM
BOD5 (mg/l)-0.0
DEFICITS (mg/D- 0.0
RIVER CONDITIONS AT HIGH FLOW
FIGURE  LIO

-------
the predicted results may vary from future observed values, although




the selection of values for "A" closely represent physical reality.




     For the given flow conditions of 480; 750 and 1,000 cfs in the




river, and waste loading of 8,680 Ibs/day BOD in the plant's effluent,




the above model was used for predicting downstream BOD and dissolved




oxygen deficit concentrations.




     First, new backwater curves were calculated based on the same




assumptions as previously mentioned for hiph flow.  Depth vs. station




and accumulative time of travel vs. station for various flows are shown




in Figure 11.




     Appropriate modifications were made in cross-sectional areas, volumes,




depths, and flows of each section either by directly altering the values,




by altering the scale factors, or by a combination of the two.




     Deficit reaction coefficients were kept constant, but reaeration




coefficients were adjusted according to the formula of Dobbins-O'Connor.




Table 1 shows the ranpe of k  's used.  Background values of 1.2 mp/1 BOD




were used in the main body of the river.  Trials were run for oxygen deficits




in the main body of the river upstream of the effluent using loading,




values of 1.4-3.2 mg/1 BOD.




Conclusions




     Because of the uncertainties in the values of several parameters,




many runs were tried.  A schematic tree of the various inputs and values




of the parameters is given in Figure 1.




     The structure of the tree is such that the more important variables




are situated above those of lesser value.  It can be seen from this




figure that flow and plant loading (which can be controlled) have






                             L-ll

-------
                            TABLE  2
                   RANGE OF K2 VALUES BASED ON
                    DOBBINS-O'CONNOR FORMULA
FLOW, cfs                    UPPER REACH              LOWER REACH
   480                       4.9 - 16.3               0.26 - 0.73
   750                       4.1 - 10.1               0.32 - 0.91
  1000                       3.4 - 8.6                0.37 - 1.05
  2500                       1.6 - 3.4                0.59 - 1.19
                         ALL VALUES IN DAYS"1
                              L-12

-------
      8



      7



      6-



  ?   5
  P   «
  0.
  LU
  O   3
tSOOo
         IOPO ef •

         760*


         4M>efl
WOODLAND
   DAM
  S 2.0-
  Ul
  o

  Ul
WOODUAND
   DAM
                           •AftIN* M.M. •MtMR
                                           MILLTOWN •MlOtC
                  100
                    200         300

                   STATION (ft. xlOO)
400
500
                                                    MH.LTOVH Ml'MI
                                                              4*0 «f>
                                                              TBOeta
                                                               1000 eft
                                                              tBOOtfi
                  100
                    200        300

                   STATION (ft. xlOO)
400
500
        DEPTH  AND  TIME  OF TRAVEL  FLOW STUDY
                                                          FIGURE  Lll

-------
significant impacts on the downstream deficits.  Benthic demand has  a

large impact also, but is not a variable of the system.

     Based on the analysis to date, at a flow of 1000 cfs and a high

benthic demand of 4 gm 02/m^/day, a BOD load of 19,200 ppd would not

be acceptable.  However, with a demand of 3 gm 02/m^/day, it would.
                ,-Jtv
     At a lower flow of 750 cfs, a BOD load of 19,000 ppd is not
                                                             2
acceptable even if the benthic demand is reduced to 2 gm O^/m /day.

A BOD load of 10,000 ppd, however, would be acceptable if the benthic
                          o
demand is indeed 2 gm 02/m /day.

     At a flow of 480 cfs, it is very doubtful that even a BOD load  of

10,000 ppd would achieve stream standards.
                               L-l3

-------
                            REFERENCES
1.  Hydroscience, Inc.  "Development of Water Quality Model of
    Boston Harbor".  Final Report.  Hydroscience, Inc., July 1971.

2.  Advisory Board on Pollution Control - St. Croix River.  St. Croix
    River.  Summary Report submitted to the International Joint
    Commission.  Advisory Board on Pollution Control, March, 1971.

3.  U. S. Army Corps of Engineers.  Report on Cross Sections and
    Sampling Survey, St. Croix River, Maine-New Brunswick.  Waltham,
    Mass.:  U. -S. Corps of Engineers, January, 1968.
                               L-14

-------
UNITED SI
      ITES
                        WOODLAND

                          SCGP
                          ST  CROIX RIVER
                     WATER QUALITY STATIONS

-------
                                                MILES
                                          DAM SITES
UNITED STATES
                        WOODLAND
                          ST CROIX RIVER
                  BIOLOGY STATIONS AND TRANSECTS
                                                                FOLDOUT  2

-------