SUMMARY
                  of
  WATER QUALITY EVALUATIONS

BOSTON HARBOR AND TRIBUTARIES
           ^••••^••l^^^MH
           JULY & AUGUST 1967
          U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
         PCDIRAL WATIN POLLUTION CONTROL ADMINISTRATION
  Northeast Water Quality  Management Center
            240 Highland Avenue
      Needham Heights , Massachusetts
                  02194

-------
                             INTRODUCTION



   .  The New England River Basins Comprehensive Program of the


Federal Water Pollution Control Administration has completed


extensive water quality investigations of the Charles Pdver and


Boston Harbor.  These investigations were conducted as a joint

      -\,
effort with the Metropolitan District Commission and the Mass-


achusetts Division of Water Pollution Control from July H -


August 18, 1967.  The work is part of an action program for


water quality control and management, and is designed to advance


the pollution control program that is already underway by state


and local agencies.  The goal of this program is to restore


these waters for all legitimate uses including swimming, boating,


and shellfish harvesting.


     Numerous sampling stations were established on the Charles


River and Boston Harbor and their tributaries.  Samples were


collected to test the dissolved oxygen content of the waters,


the number of coliform and salmonella bacteria, the level of


suspended solids, color and turbidity of the waters, and nitrogen


and phosphorus concentrations.  In total, over seven hundred


water samples were taken during the one-month period.  Samples


of bottom material were also analyzed for biological character-


istics.  The resulting data is being used to evaluate existing


water quality and to provide a basis for solutions to the complex


water quality problems in the Charles River Watershed and Boston


Harbor.

-------
                          CR.IRLES  RIVER WATERSHED

Dissolved  Oxygen
     An important indicator of water quality  is  the  dissolved
oxygen level.   It is often used as a general  measure of  clean  or
dirty waters.   Large concentrations of oxygen-demanding  pollutants,
such as sewage  or industrial wastes, reduce the  amount of dissolved
oxygen in  the water causing the loss of desirable aquatic life
and fish population.  Five milligrams  of oxygen  per  liter,  (mg/1),
of water is the accepted  minimum  for maintaining a good  fish
habitat.   If a  complete depletion of the available dissolved
oxygen occurs,  offensive  odors result.
     During the evaluation, the minimum observed dissolved  oxygen
value was  3.1 mg/1 which  occurred upstream of Milford at Station
                                    \.
C-l.  (See Figure 1)  Values less than 5.0 mg/1  were observed  at
eight out  of the 15 stations located on the main river.  Average
and minimum dissolved oxygen contents  are shown  on the attached
Figure 2.                                           „
Bacteria
     Another important indicator  of pollution is the number of
coliform bacteria detected in the samples.  Coliform bacteria
are a group of  several different  kinds  of bacteria,  usually of
intestinal origin, which are detected by a specific  standard test.
These bacteria, while not usually harmful in  themselves, indicate
the probable presence of pathogenic or  disease-causing bacteria.
If ingested, these pathogenic bacteria  can cause gastro-intestinal
disease.

-------
     a count of 1,000 organisms per 100 milliliters is the generally

accepted maximum if swimming is to be permitted.  Counts in excess
                                                            \
of this number were encountered at all sampling points in the

Charles River Watershed.  The.highest counts occurred at the John

Weeks ?oot Bridge (C-16) in Cambridge, which averaged 220,000
      "•*_
organisms per 100 milliliters during the test period.  A graph

showing the average coliform counts at each station is attached

as Figure 3.  Coliform amounts, however, varied widely from day to

day as a result of overflows from combined sewer systems in the area.

     Tests were also made for the presence of Salmonella, which is

.one of the most common disease-producing organisms.  One-half of

the test results were positive indicating the serious nature of

pollution in the watershed.

Biological Studies

    . Analysis of bottom organisms, aquatic plants, nutrients,

bacteriological and chemical factors in the Charles River revealed

water quality degradation from Milford, Massachusetts through

Medfield, Massachusetts, a distance of 32 miles.  Water quality

in the middle reaches of the river from Medfield to Wellesley,

Massachusetts was less degraded, but nutrients from upstream sources

caused dense growths of aquatic plants, including phytoplankton

(suspended algae), in these areas.  An over-abundance of aquatic

plants can cause unsightly conditions, reduce dissolved oxygen

contents and limit water resource potentials.

-------
     Below Wellesley the river was characterized by a .reduction



of organisms associated with clean water and an increase inxthe



population of sludgeworms which are characteristic of polluted



waters.  In the Lower Gharles River Basin itself, no bottom



organisms were found at the John Weeks Foot, Bridge (C-16), and at



the Longfellow Bridge (C-17).  The absence of such organisms



suggests that toxic conditions have even prevented the establish-



ment of pollution tolerant animal life on the bottom.

-------
             LE6EKD
             IIISTIM I««S

         £l] SAMPLING
             STATION
             LOCATIONS
 CHARLES RIVER WATERSHED
CHAKIES RIVER,      MASSACHUSETTS
             FIGURE  1

-------
  10-
a*
E
UJ
X
o

o  4
UJ
o
CO
CO
   2-
   0





MILFORD




v
0
O
or
m
UJ
i
r i





MEDWAY
Avg.

Min._











I
i
1

i
u






1

I
!
£::
•"•*•".



u










w
y%









i
u




QZ
UJ
E
Q.
O
1-
CO
' 1





CO
_l
["•





^ MEDFIELD
8
^c
o
CO
CO
•^
^ ST. STEPHEI


jc
o
o
o-
ffi
cr
ur
1






< — Minimum to maintain
/ good fish habitat
/
/
/
/
/
/
/






p

:^
i



•_

J
ill
i
1
1






cc
1
u













1

1
i




0

















o

o
7*^


m







U












1










(V
i
u


























i
u














p*1










1
u













-.


.

_





to
1
o

















- i


(fi

o









n*p




N
t
O








80 70 60 50 40 30 2O 10 0
NOTE;

Results are  based on 13 samples

taken of each  station between

July 17 and August 15, 1967
                                              River  Miles
        QUALITY  CONTROL  EVALUATION

   CHARLES  RIVER WATERSHED

      DISSOLVED OXYGEN
               (D.O)
                                                                                                               U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
                                                                                                              FBOMAl. WATEM POLLUTION CONTROL MMWISTMATIOH
                                                                                                                                     •O»TOII.MAt«.


                                                                                                                                      FIGURE 2

-------
cr

t, 000,0003
—


100,000 -
E
o 10,000-
O -

^ :
z
1 _
o
o
o | 000 :
co * :
E I
o
•»-
o
O
roo -
-


10



Ik
a
<
u
:

^
O
•» o
C K
" CD
•• LU
J z
I i
1 ' 1




' >•
MEDWA



CC
>
E
a
c
en
r ^
'



M
I
2

C
U
U
c
u
• _ 2
•
^
:






-













^^










r
u



^












M
i.
U

































u



















=








-------
                             BOSTON HARBOR

     Water quality analyses of Boston Harbor revealed that all
reaches of the Harbor and each of its tributary streams, except
the inland marine reaches of the Weymouth Back and Weir Rivers,
were polluted.  About one-third of the Harbor's area was grossly
polluted by municipal and industrial waste discharges and combined
sewer overflows to the Harbor.  In addition, combined sewers
discharged wastes to the reaches of the Lfystic, Maiden, Chelsea,
Weymouth Fore, and Neponset Rivers nearest the Harbor,  intensive
deposits of decayed organic matter and oil residues covered much
of the Harbor bed.  High bacteria counts, the over-abundance of
pollution-associated organisms, and the near absence of aquatic
life in these tributary streams were indications of severely
polluted waters.
Dissolved Oxygen                                              .
     Dissolved oxygen contents in the Harbor varied widely from
point to point and from day to day.  They ranged from a minimum
of 2.4. mg/1 to a maximum of 16.0 mg/1.  Values less than 5.0 mg/1
occurred at all harbor stations at some time during the evaluation^
With few exceptions, low levels at each station in the Harbor
occurred following rainfall.  This indicates the water of the
Harbor is well mixed and that overflows from combined sewers and
storm runoff exert a strong influence.
     Values in the tributary streams were generally lower ranging
from a minimum of 0.3 mg/1 to a maximum of 9.6 mg/1.   The 1-fystic,

-------
Madden, Chelsea and Neponset Rivers all had minimum values  of

less than 2.5 mg/1.
• '•        .               .    ••"•••'•..'        •        .     • v
Bacteria

     High coliform bacteria counts appeared throughout  the  Harbor

and tributaries with the exception of Hull Bay and  Weymouth Back
      .~-\_
River.  Again wide variations were found at almost  all  locations

with the highest totals occurring in the Mystic  River,  the  Chelsea

River, the Inner Harbor and adjacent to Deer  Island.

     In addition to the tests for total and fecal coliforms, tests

for the detection of Salmonella bacteria were performed by  placing

swabs in the Harbor and selected tributaries.  Of the 12  swabs

that were placed in these waters, 11 were recovered and 6 were

ppsitlve for Salmonella which indicates contamination by  disease^.

producing organisms.

     The location of sampling stations, and data on dissolved

oxygen and coliform bacteria are shown on Figure 4-.

Nutrients

     High concentrations of nutrients such as ammonia,  nitrogen

and soluble phosphorous caused by the discharge  of  waste  waters,

were found throughout the Harbor including the Weymouth Back and

Fore Rivers and salt water reaches of the Chelsea,  Charles, Maiden

and Mystic Rivers.  This condition caused an  over-enrichment of

the water which stimulated the growth and development of  dense

populations of undesirable aquatic organisms  such as algae  growths

-------
and sea lettuce.  These organisms cause noxious conditions in

parts of the Harbor which prevent swimming, cause unsightly growths
                                                           \
at marine facilities and increase maintenance costs associated

with buoys and piers.

-------
  WINTHROP HXRBOR
X  ----- eosrq/Y--
          OUTER	
            HARBOR
Di^oLVjti o.-TfCS.' ,jzj
TOTAL UJLI/UX: v.xuj^

Sanple
Station
ai-i
K.,-1
CH-l
I.HJ
K-l
H-2
K-3
'--4

B-6
K-7
K-S

H-10
B-U
Ii-12
H-13

K-15
11-16
K-17
H-18
H-l
H-2
•J-l
.B-l
•—1



ilissolvod Ujcycer. (nt/1)
:!njtllnun
9.2
9.5
8.6
9.4
?.o
12.3
9.S
9.8
10.0
10.4
11.0
11.7
13.3
15.5
13.3
12.6
12.0
16.0
15.6
13.8
11.6
11.2
1.2
5.6
8.2
8.8
9.6
.'Inijnuo
1.6
2.3
2.4
1.4
3.2
3.1
3.4
4.1
2.6

2.4
2.8
2.5
2.6
2.3
3.1
3.2
2.8
2.4
2.9
2.4
4.8
0.3
1.8
5.4
5.3
6.3
Average
3.9
5.1
5.2
5.0
5.0
7.3
6.9
6.9
6.9
6.2
6.2
6.9
7.5
7.5
7.4
7.9
7.4
8.5
• e.7
3.4
8.2
7.7
0.8
3.8
7.0
7.7
8.2



Total Oollforms ter 100 ml.
Cwbrane FllWr l*thod)
taxlmm
1,700,000
140,000
1,500,000
3V.OOO
520,000
330,000
6>, 000
46,000
01,000
250,000
36,000
3,600
4,300
C',300
7,500
C4O
GSO
2,300
1,600
52,000
1,750,000
110,000
110,000
53,000
22,000
470
1,800
-.dnimrn.
1,100
1,000
9,200
3,000
1,300
3,000
< 100
300
•:,ooo
1,600
100
< 2
< 2
70
16
<10
2
6
20
500
2,500
2.900
700
3,800
<100
8
180
«vorag«
33,700
20,000
91,300
21,700
33,100
27,500
6,400
2.70C
31,700
22,600
4,700
50
130
940
400'
90
6O
240
280
6,400
44,000
22,400
8,500
14,200
. 1,300
90
360
                                                                                           NOTE :
                                                                                           Results are  based  on 13  samples
                                                                                           at  each  station taken  between
                                                                                           July  17, and  August 18,  1967.
                                                                                              WATEH QOALllf  CUNTHOL  tVALUATION
                                                                                                  BOSTON    HARBOR
                                                                                            STATION  LOCATIONS ft SELECTED
                                                                                                  WATER QUALITY DATA
                                                                                               U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
                                                                                             FEDERAL WATER POLLUTION CONTROL ADMINISTRATION
                                                                                           NORTHEAST MECIOH               BOSTON,MASS.
                                                                                                                      FIGURE 4

-------
                              CONCLUSION


     The degraded water quality of the Charles River and Boston
                                                            \
Harbpr significantly reduces the use and value of these waters

which must serve a surrounding metropolitan area.

     Th? data gathered through this investigation on water quality

in the Charles River and Boston Harbor have provided much needed

information for the development of an effective and adequate pol-

lution control program.  Mathematical models will be developed

to help dominate a framework for action.  The models will simulate

the response of the waters to various pollutional loads, tidal and

flow variations and temperatures.  They will be used to project

future conditions, evaluate alternates and to help determine the

additional measures necessary to restore the quality of the waters

of the Charles River and Boston Harbor for total community use

jLncluding recreational, educational and commercial purposes.

-------