U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
                       National Technical Information Service
                       PB-285 532
Assessment of the  Hazards of
Polybrominated  Biphenyls
(U.S.) Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D C
Apr 78

-------
                               EPA-560/6-77-037
                               April 1978
ASSESSMENT OF THE HAZARDS OF POLYBROMINATED BIPHENYLS
                          by

                Frederick J. Di Carlo
                   Joseph Seifter
                 Vincent J. DeCarlo
                   In House Report
                   Project Officer
                Frederick J. Di Carlo
                     April 1978
           ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
             OFFICE OF TOXIC SUBSTANCES
               WASHINGTON, D.C.  20460

-------
                                   TECHNICAL REPORT DATA
                            (Please nod Instructions on the reverse before completing)
1. REPORT NO.
EPA-560/6-77-037
4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE
Assessment  of  the Hazai-ds'pf Poiybrominated Biphenyls
                                6. REPORT DATE
                                 .  April 1978
                                                            6. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE
7. AUTHOR(S)
Frederick  J.'Di Carlo, Joseph "Seifter  and
Vincent  J.  DeCarlo        '"  	•'•' : •''
                                                            8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NO.
9. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS
 OTS  IN-HOUSE REPORT
                                                            10. PROGRAM ELEMENT NO.
                                                            11. CONTRACT7GRANT NOT
                                                                   ; IN HOUSE
12. SPONSORING AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS
  .EPAj  Office of Toxic Substances
  Health Review Division, .
  401 M Street, S;W..    '
  Washington, D.C.   20460      .
                                 13. TYPE OF REPORT AND PERIOD COVERED
                                14. SPONSORING AGENCY CODE
                                   EPA/OTS - TS-792
16. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES              .     .

  Project Officer:  Frederick J.'D'j. Carlo
16. ABSTRACT                        .  .
During  their peak use period, PEBs-'-r-epresented under 1% of  the total sales of fire re-
tardant chemicals, and very probably would have escaped intensive study if the had not
been mixed.accidentally with animal.feed preparations.  Instead,  international attention
was drawn' to PBBs by the.state-supervised killing of.-over 35,'000  cattle-which had been
contaminated with PBBs.  Interestingly,  Ipw doses of PBBs exert a broad spectrum'of
toxicological,. pharmacological,-and.tidchemi'cal effects despite low actite toxicity.
These effects .and the intensive  bioaccumulation of PBBs derive .from their structure and
their consequent resistance pf biotransfcarnation and high solubility in fat.  In rodents,
PBBs are teratogenic, iomunosuppressive, 'and potentially carcinogenic. .In bovine, ro-
dent; and avian.species,.PBBs reduce feed intake and induce mixed, function oxidases of
liver•microsdmes.  The latter effect may be responsible for steriod level changes which
underline hormonal.toxicities observed in cows, mink, rats, and chickens.  The effects
of PBBs on humans are controversial, but data'suggestive df immunologies!, skin, and
liver disorders continue to accumulate.'   Concern about the  clinical effects of PBB's
is heightened by the knowledge  that  these.cpmpounds .readily enter the fetus by crossing
the placental barrier "and can be transferred to .newborn children  after -extensive passage
into breast milk.    -.''.'.    ' "•                          . „
17.
                                KEY WORDS AND DOCUMENT ANALYSIS
                  DESCRIPTORS
                   b.lOENTIFIERS/OPEN ENDED TERMS
c. COSATI Fjeld/Croup
 polybrominated. biphenyls
 PBB's         ' .       :  ,
 hexabromob ipheny1
 octabromobiphenyl  '  ..-.,.
 decabromobiphenyl •
 fire retardants   .   /
 industrial sites
 air         ;
soil      •
water, sediment
landfill ••'''.
human exposure .
FDA guidelines
health effects
metabolism
bioaccumulation
18. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT

      RELEASED UNLIMITED
                   INSECURITY CLASS (ThitReport)
                       UNCLASSIFIED
                                               21.
                                               20. SECURITY CLASS (This page)
                                                   UNCLASSIFIED
                                              22. PRICE
EPA Form 2220-1 (R«». 4-77)   PREVIOUS EDITION is oasoLiPre
                                              cn

-------
           (i)-
This document is available through
the National Technical Information
Service (NTIS), 5285 Port Royal Rd,
Springfield VA  22161.  Telephone:
(703) 557-4650.

-------
                   (ii)
This report has been reviewed by the
Office of Toxic Substances, EPA, and
approved for publication.  Approval
does not signify that the contents
necessarily reflect Environmental Pro-
tection Agency views and policies; nor
does mention of trade names or commer-
cial products constitute endorsement
or recommendation for use.

-------
Assessment
Polybrominafed   Biphenyls
by  Frederick J. Di Carlo,*   Joseph
and  Vincent J. DeCarSo*
              During their peak use period, PBBs represented under 1% of the total sales of Tire retardant chemicals,
            and very probably would have escaped intensive study if they had not been mixed accidentally with animal
            feed preparations. Instead, international attention was drawn to PBBs by the state-supervised killing of
            over 35,000 cattle which had been contaminated with PBBs. Interestingly, low doses of PBBs exert a
            broad spectrum of lexicological, pharmacological, and biochemical effects despite low acute toxicity.
            These effects and the intensive bioaccumulation of PBBs derive from their structure and their consequent
            resistance of biotransformation and high solubility in fat. In rodents, PBBs are teratogenic, Immunosup-
            pressive, and potentially carcinogenic. In bovine, rodent, and avian species, PBBs reduce feed intake and
            induce mixed function oxidases of liver microsomes. The latter effev« may be responsible for steroid level
            changes which underline hormonal toxicities observed in cows, mink, rats,  and chickens. The effects of
            PBBs on humans are controversial, but data suggestive of immunological, skin, and liver disorders
            continue to accumulate. Concern about the clinical effects of PBBs is heightened by the knowledge that
            these compounds readily enter the fetus by crossing the placenta! barrier and can be transferred to
            newborn children after extensive passage into breast milk.
Introduction

  Fire safety  legislation during the last decade
greatly stimulated the discovery, production, and
application of fire retardant chemicals (/). By 1975,
production of  these compounds reached approxi-
mately1350 x 106 Ib. At present, more than 60% of
the total production is used to fireproof carpets and
rugs.  The balance is impregnated into  clothing,
home furnishings and a  wide  variety of construc-
tion, electrical  and electronic products. PBBs were
introduced in 1970, and their manufacture increased
100-fold by  1974 (2). Even  in 1974, however, the
sale of PBBs constituted less than 1% of the  total
market for fire retardants, because their application
was  limited  predominantly to incorporation into
thermoplastics used to construct housings for busi-
ness machines and electrical units.
  In 1973, the  accidental addition of 500-1000 Ib of
PBBs, as  FireMaster BP-6, instead of magnesium
oxide to animal feed  in Michigan resulted in wide-
  * Office of Toxic Substances. U. S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Washington, D £• 20460.
spread contamination of farm animals requiring the
destruction of approximately 29,800 cattle, 5,920
hogs, 1,470 sheep, and 1.5 million chickens (3). Also
removed from the commercial market were at least
865 tons of animal feed, 17,790 Ib of cheese, 2630 Ib
of butter, 34,000 Ib of dry milk products, and nearly
5 million eggs. This mixing error has been alleged to
have caused a great number of health problems in
people who consumed the milk and food contam-
inated with PBBs (4-15). As a result of this incident,
the production of FireMaster BP-6 by Michigan
Chemical Corp. was stopped  in 1974.
  The Environmental Protection Agency has con-
tinued to work wjth the State of Michigan and other
Federal Agencies in an effort to bring the PBB prob-
lem in Michigan under control. In addition, in early
1977, when information was received on the pro-
duction  of PBBs in New Jersey, an immediate in-
vestigation was initiated to determine the level and
scope of contamination around the identified man-
ufacturing facilities.  This study is currently under-
way; environmental .and human contamination have
been  found  near plants of the Hexcel Corp.  in
Sayreville, N.J.  and White Chemical  Co. in Bay-
onne, N. J. As a  consequence of the Michigan inci-
dent and the effects of PBBs on animals, the  EPA is

-------
                                          (2)
investigating the need for possible  regulatory ac-
tion.

Production of PBBs

Chemistry

  The term polybrominated biphenyls (PBBs) re-
fers to a group  of chemicals which  are formed by
substituting bromine for hydrogen in biphenyl. Al-
though theory allows the formation of 209 bromi-
nated biphenyls, only about  40 have been syn-
thesized in pure form even on a laboratory scale
(16).
  Commercial PBB products are mixtures. These
mixtures contain compounds  which differ with re-
gard to  both the extent and positions of bromina-
tion. For example,  18 different components were
detected in coirimercial FireMaster BP-6 (17), al-
though this preparation was commonly identified as
"hexabromobiphenyP' by  the  manufacturer. The
quantity of hexabromobiphenyls in BP-6 varied;
contents of > 60% (18), 63%  (19, 20), about 75%
(2/), and 90% (22) have been reported.  It is clear
that the major  hexabromobiphenyl  in BP-6 is the
2,2',4,4',5,5'  isomer (17, 20,  23).  In addition to
hexabromobiphenyls, BP-6 contains isomeric tetra-
bromobiphenyls, pentabromobiphenyls, heptabro-
mobiphenyls, arid an octabromobiphenyl (17,19,20).
The major heptabromobiphenyl contains bromine at
positions 2,2',3,4,4',5, and 5' (21). FireMaster FF-1
(BP-6 mixed with 2% calcium silicate) was found to
be  contaminated with trace  quantities of  hexa-
bromonaphthalene,  pentabromonaphthalene, and
tetrabromonaphthalene (18, 20), and with at least 23
other   compounds  (20).  Commercial   octa-
bromobiphenyl (OBB) contained at least four com-
pounds; a heptabromobiphenyl,  isomeric  octa-
bromobiphenyls, and a nonabromobiphenyl (24). As-
says of two samples of OBB showed their chemical
composition  to be 1.8% heptabromobiphenyl,
45.2% octabromobiphenyl, 47.4% nonabromo-
biphenyl,  and 5.-7% decabromobiphenyl (25); and
1.0% heptabromobiphenyl,  33.0% octabromo-
biphenyl,  60.0% nonabromobiphenyl,  and 6.0%
decabromobiphenyl  (26). It is noteworthy that the
major component of commercial OBB was  nona-
bromobiphenyl, not octabromobiphenyl. Commer-
cial decabromobiphenyl (DBB) was found to consist
of 96.8%  decabromobiphenyl, 2.9%  nonabromo-
biphenyl, and 0.3% octabromobiphenyl (27).
  BP-6 is a solid which softens at 72°C and decom-
poses above 300°C.  It is extremely  soluble in non-
polar solvents sucjh as toluene and benzene, but dis-
solves only slightly in water. Its solubility in water
has been estimated as 11 ppb (79) and 610 ppb (28).
 Upon  irradiation   with   ultraviolet   light,
 2,2',4,4',5,5'-hexabromobiphenyl in methanol was
 degraded rapidly to less brominated PBBs and to
 small quantities of methoxybiphenyls containing I
 to 5 bromine atoms  (29).  Exposing a methanolic
 solution of BP-6 to ultraviolet irradiation for 45 min
 converted 70% of the material to pentabromo-
 biphenyl and tetrabromobiphenyl (30). OBB dis-
 solved in xylene was also readily photodegraded by
 reductive denomination (25). Further investigation
 of the photochemical reactivity of PBBs containing
 2 to 8 bromine atoms disclosed that denomination
 proceeds most readily in  positions ortho to. the
 biphenyl linkage (31).
  OBB is a solid which melts at 200-250°C and de-
 composes at 435°C. The solubility of OBB in water
 was reported as 20-30 ppb (25). OBB  dissolves
 readily in organic solvents, but is considerably less
 soluble  than  BP-6  (25).  Commercial deca-
 bromobiphenyl is a solid which melts at 380-386°C
 (32).


 Assay

  The original identification of PBBs in animal feed
 by Dr. George F. Fries was performed by gas chro-
 matography (3), and this type of instrumentation
 has  been used in assay methods which were  de-
.veloped  subsequently (32-35). The  increasingly
 stringent FDA guidelines for PBBs in foods and
 animal feeds have  been based upon the sensitivity
 of these  methods,  not upon toxicological findings
 (3). Electron-capture detectors were employed be-
 cause they are highly sensitive to halogenated com-
 pounds. These detectors have disadvantages, how-
 ever. One problem is that they are so easily con-
 taminated that their sensitivity becomes variable,
 and reproducible data can be obtained only by run-
 ning standards frequently and by intervening with
 thorough bakeouts. Two noteworthy  efforts were
 made to minimize  sample  contamination. One in-
 volves gel-permeation chromatOgraphy as a cleanup
 procedure for the assay of PBBs in extracts of fat
 from butter, milk and cheese (33). The other method
 involves cleanup by elution from Florisil columns
 and  was used to determine PBBs in animal feeds
 (34). These procedures can measure PBBs at levels
 as low as 7 ppb in  dairy products and 3 ppb in dry
 animal feeds. Another problem with electron-
 capture detectors is that they are difficult to use
 routinely in conjuction  with temperature pro-
 gramming because they require very good temper-
 ature isolation between the column and detector
 and rigorous control of the purity of the carrier gas
 to preclude the collection of impurities at the head
 of the column whence they elute and produce poor

-------
                                               (3)
baselines. These problems  were circumvented in
the most sophisticated PBB  assay methodology de-
veloped  to date (35).  The method involves gas
chromatography/mass spectrometry/computer
analysis. A wide variety of  environmental soil and
water samples were assayed for PBBs by using the
mass spectrometer in  the multiple  ion detection
mode to attain high sensitivity. This assay system,
unlike the others,  allowed  temperature program-
ming which facilitated the resolution of biphenyls
substituted with one to 10 atoms of bromine.


Manufacture

  The bromination of biphenyls to PBBs was cov-
ered in four patents granted  between  1966 and 1974
(36-39). Two  of the processes involve bromination
in the presence of  large quantities of chlorine (36,
39). The third employs an aluminum halide catalyst
(37) and the fourth involves using bromine dissolved
in chlorosulfonic acid and iodine, aluminum, and
iodide-iron mixtures as catalysts (38).
  The commercial production of PBBs  began in
1970. As shown in Table 1, approximately 13.3 mil-
lion  Ib of PBBs  were produced in the U.S.  from
1970 through 1976 (40). About 11.8 million Ib of this
total was hexabromobiphenyl; the remaining 1.5
million Ib consisted of octabromobiphenyl and
decabromobiphenyl. Michigan Chemical Corp. (St.
Louis, Mich.) produced BP-6, and White Chemical
Co. (Bayonne, N. J.) and Hexcel Corp. (Sayreville,
N. J.) manufactured octabromobiphenyl and deca-
bromobiphenyl. The Michigan Chemical Corp. pro-
duced no BP-6 in 1975, but the other two companies
continued their production of the more highly
brominated biphenyls into 1977. No production fig-
ures for 1977 are available, but 1976 production was
estimated  to consist  of  30,000  Ib  of  octa-
bromobiphenyl . and 775,000  Ib of decabromobi-
phenyl (40).

Import/Export

  At present, no PBBs are being imported in  com-
mercial quantities. On the other hand, the export of
          PBBs from the U. S. to Europe has increased during
          the past several years and totalled 805,000 Ib in 1976
          (40). No information is available on the extent of
          PBB import in the form of finished plastic products.

          Industrial Users

            More than 130 companies in the U. S. used PBBs
          prior to 1976 (41). In 1974, the major user of BP-6
          was the Borg-Warner Corp, producing flame fetar-
          dant resins of acrylonitrile, butadiene, arid styrehe
          for business machine and electrical housings. At
          that time, BP-6 was also used in coatings and lac-
          quers and in polyurethane foam for automobile up-
          holstery (40). All of these uses were discontinued in
          late 1974 as a result of knowledge of the Michigan
          incident. No current users have been identified in
          the United States.

          Pollution from  Manufacture and
          Industrial Users of PBBs

            Losses of PBBs to the environment at sites of its
          manufacture (40) can total 51,000  Ib/million Ib of
          product through: emission to the air from the vents
          of the hydrogen bromide recovery system, losses in
          the waste waters resulting from the  quenching and
          washing of the PBBs as they are recovered from the
          reaction mass, and solid losses to landfills resulting
          from drying, handling of the product, shipping and
          transportation.
            Michigan  Chemical Corp. discontinued  BP-6
          production in 1974, and White Chemical Co. and
          Hexcel Corp. discontinued  their  OBB and  DBB
          production  in early 1977. The following  process
          losses reflect environmental losses that occurred at
          those plants when PBBs were being produced.


          Air

            In 1977, the maximum air losses as particulate
          matter  at production sites were estimated to total
          1125 Ib of PBBs/million Ib manufactured (40).
            In May 1974, air emissions at  the  Michigan
                 Table 1. Commercial production of polybrominated biphenyls in the U. S., 1970-1976.
                                                    Estimated production, ib
Product
                              1970
1971
1972
1973
1974
                         1975
1976
1970-1976
Hexabromobiphenyl0
Octabromobiphenyl and
decabromobiphenyl'
Total P$Bs
20,900

31
51

,000
,900
185,000

31,000
216,000
2,221

32
2,253
,000

,000
,000
3,889,000

359,000
4,248,000
4,882

106
4,988
,000

,000
,000
0

170,000
170,000
0

805,000
805,000
11,800,000

1.544,000
13,344,000
  ° Manufactured by Michigan Chemical Corp.
  * Manufactured by White Chemical Co. and Hexcel Corp. Manufacture was continued in 1977, but production figures are unavail-
able.

-------
Chemical Corp.  showed BP-6 levels of 2-3  x
10~* mg/1. at vents. From these data, the total emis-
sion of BP-6 to the air from  the vents of the hy-
drogen bromide recovery system was estimated as
0.07 Ib/million Ib produced (79, 40).
  Since PBBs were precipitated from the solvent
used during bromination, the reaction mixtures be-
came slurries' from which the products were recov-
ered by centrifugation. Paniculate PBB was lost to
the atmosphere during this centrifugation, but  no
data are available for the Michigan production site.
  After collection by centrifugation, PBBs were
dried and pulverized to a fine powder.  Dust from
this  operation was removed by a bag type filter.
During May and October 1974, atmospheric levels
of BP-6 in the Michigan Chemical Corporation bag-
ger area were 0.016-0.032 mg/1. of air  during the
bagging operation and 0.003 mg/1. of air after bag-
ging was  completed  (41).  Lower levels were de-
tected in other areas of the plant.
  Ambient PBBs were not detected in air samples
collected downwind from the Hexcel Corp. plant
'(42). However, a New Jersey permit application by
this company indicates that some paniculate PBBs
were lost to the atmosphere during centrifugation
and that this loss was less than 0.05% of the product
(43).
  PBBs were detected at the same concentration (6
x 10"" mg/1.) in air samples collected downwind
and crosswind from the White Chemical Co. plant
(42).

Water and Sediment

  The losses of PBBs to sewers at  manufacturing
sites were estimated  in 1977 to  be  only 0.0046  Ib/
million Ib of product (40).
  In manufacturing PBBs, water was added to the
reaction  mixture when the desired extent of bro-
mination was achieved.  Samples of the Michigan
Chemical Corp. effluent discharges  were  found to
contain the highest PBB levels (98-503 ppm) in 1972
(44).  The company outfalls  assayed in 1974 and
early 1975 were found to have PBB concentrations
as high as 104 ppb. and the total quantity  of PBBs
then being discharged to the  Pine River was esti-
mated as 0.25 Ib daily (44). Unfiltered  Pine River
water collected in mid-1974 showed PBB  levels of
3.2 ppb and  0.01 ppb in specimens  collected 75  yd
and  8 miles, respectively,  downstream from the
plant. The losses of BP-6 to the sanitary sewer sys-
tem  were estimated as 0.0046  Ib/million  Ib of prod-
uct (40).
  PBBs  reached  higher concentrations in stream
sediments. Assays conducted from July 1974 to
April 1975 showed PBB levels up to  77 ppm in near-
shore sediments, and declines in sediment content
to 16.2 ppm one-half mile downstream and  to O.I
ppm 24 miles downstream (44).
  Unfiltered water from an industrial storm  sewer
at the Hexcel Corp. plant contained 92 ppb, mainly
as   decabromobiphenyl  (42).   Hexabromo-,
octabromo-, and  nonabromobiphenyls  were also
measurable. A swamp containing runoff water from
the plant showed the presence  of  135 ppb, again
predominantly as decabromobiphenyl. Reeds in the
swamp contained 25-62 ppm of PBBs, and a turtle
captured  nearby  contained  20  ppb  of  hexa-
bromobiphenyl.
  Liquid effluents  from the White Chemical Co.
plant were  piped to the  head of a dead end canal
called the Platte Kill, This  canal, which acts as a
treatment area, empties into the  Kill  Van Kull
River. Unfiltered water from the head of the  Platte
Kill contained up to 31 ppb of PBBs, while water at
the mouth of the canal contained 7  ppb (42). Sedi-
ment at the head of the Platte Kill contained up to
290 ppm while sediments in the Kill Van Kull con-
tained 20 ppb or  less. Interestingly,  monobromo-
through decabromobiphenyls were  found  in sedi-
ment at the head of the Platte  Kill whereas only
hexabromo- and heptabromobiphenyls were  found
in the Kill Van Kull sediment. Fish  taken from the
Kill Van Kull contained  up  to 160 ppb of PBBs.

Landfill

  A recent estimate of PBB  losses as solid waste to
landfill was 50,000 Ib/million Ib of product (40).
  The Michigan Chemical Corp.  reported that their
solid waste was approximately 59f of the BP-6 pro-
duced and that about  half of this waste (269.000 Ib)
had been deposited in the Gratiot County landfill in
St. Louis, Michigan during  1971-1973 (41). An in-
vestigation of this landfill was initiated in February
1977 (45). Groundwater samples  were found to
contain very low PBB levels (0.1-0.2 pph), bui the
concentrations in  drainage  ditch and catch  basin
specimens were far greater (0.35-1.2 ppm) (4f>).

Soil

  Soil samples from the  bagging and loading  areas
of the Michigan Chemical Corp. contained PBBs at
concentrations of 3500 and 2500  ppm.  respectively
(44).
  PBBs in soil near the Hexcel Corp. plant ranged
from 40 ppb to 3.1  ppm (42). Most of the material
was  decabromobiphenyl, but lower  hrominated
forms down to hexabromobiphenyl were also  pres-
ent.
  Soil near the White Chemical Co. plant  ranged

-------
 from 750 and 2800 ppb in PBBs (42). Again,  al-
 though the decabromo compound was most plenti-
 ful, there were significant levels of the less bromi-
 nated biphenyls down to hexabromobiphenyl.

 Human Exposure

 Air

   Workers involved in {he synthesis of PBBs or the
 manufacture of PBB-containing plastics and plastic
 products can be exposed to PBBs present in air as
 vapor or dust.
   While PBBs are effective fire retardants in  ther-
 moplastics, they can pose a health  hazard because
 flameless combustion of the consumer products
 (e.g., in a garbage dump or an office fire) causes
 volatilization of intact PBBs (47).

 Water

,   There are no data on the direct exposure of hu-
 mans to PBB-containing water.

 Soil

   The useful life of most products containing PBBs
 has been estimated as 5-10 years, at which time
 they are discarded or buried in a sanitary landfill (2,
 19). Adsorption studies show that PBBs are bound
 tightly by clay minerals (45) and various soils (28).
 Thus, PBBs may  remain in soil for  many years be-
 cause they are als.0  nonvolatile and resistant to
 bacterial degradation (17).

 Nonaccidental Entrance into Food Chain

   Grass and  carrots grown in PBB-containing soil
 absorbed  very little of  the  contaminant  (17),
 suggesting no hazard from this source. However,
 the recalcitrance of PBBs to leaching and  bacterial
 degradation indicates that the compounds will be
 present indefinitely in soils where  they can be in-
 gested by farm animals which are used for food.
 Accidental Entrance into Food Chain

   Through the misuse of PBBs in Michigan, several
 farms received feeds containing very high levels of
 the flame retardant. The maximum PBB concentra-
 tions ingested by farm animals ranged from 4,000 to
 13,500 ppm (9). Secondary contamination of animal
 feed  and medicinals occurred  through the use of
 contaminated equipment and facilities. In 1974,68%
 of 1770 feed samples collected  in Michigan con-
tained PBB residues; 60% in the range of trace to
0.99 ppm, and 8% over 1 ppm (48). Resampling in
1975 revealed that 6% of 1208 feed samples were
contaminated and that fewer than 0.16% contained
more than 1 ppm of PBBs. In 1976, only 0.3% of 663
samples analyzed were contaminated; no samples
contained more than 0.1 ppm (48). In 1974 and 1975,
low level feed contamination with PBBs was de-
tected in Indiana and Illinois (49).  Contributing to
the introduction of PBBs into farm animals was the
distribution  of contaminated aureomycin  by the
Farm  Bureau; levels of PBBs in their antibiotics
were as high as 70 ppm (50).
  PBB-containing meats, milk,  butter, eggs and
cheese entered the human food chain before the
cause of the Michigan problem was identified. The
magnitude of the surveys for PBBs in food  is evi-
dent from the report that 29,170 products had been
assayed as of April I, 1977 (5/). In 1974, 14 of 16
milk samples, 4 of 34 butter samples and II of 23
cheese samples collected in Michigan were found to.
exceed FDA guidelines for PBBs (49). Another sur-
vey showed that 24.9% of 272 finished product
samples collected from  May to October 1974 were
contaminated with PBBs and that 15.8% contained
more than 0.3 ppm (52). PBBs were detected even
in beef in Iowa, duck in Wisconsin, chicken in
Alabama, Mississippi, New York and Texas, and
turkey in Indiana: the  levels were extremely low
(52).
  PBB food levels in Michigan decreased in 1975
(49). None of J8  milk samples, 3 of 14 butter sam-
ples, and none of 13 cheese samples exceeded FDA
guidelines (which had been lowered from I  ppm to
0.3 ppm on  a fat basis) (53). Also in  1975,  245 of
2040 meat samples were contaminated with  PBBs;
24 contained more than 0.3 ppm (49).  None of the
meat specimens  collected in 1976  exceeded FDA
guidelines; 96% of  1430 samples were contam-
inated, but only  I sample contained more than 0.6
ppm of PBBs (49). A  market basket survey of meat
in 1976 revealed  detectable  PBBs in only I  of 102
samples in  Michigan (54).  Outside of Michigan,
PBBs were found in  9 of 597 food samples  during
1975'and 1976(52).
  A recent study (55) has confirmed  the early im-
pression that PBB levels in dairy products tend to
be proportional to their fat content. Additionally, it
was found that the spray-drying process apparently
exposed and volatilized PBBs from whole and skim
milk to reduce PBB  levels in the dried products.
  On  nonquarantined farms, 99% of 74 adults and
97% of 30 children  had PBB blood values below
0.019 ppm while, on quarantined farms, only 56% of
82 adults and 29%  of  28 children showed levels
below 0.019 ppm (6, 13). There were 6 adults and 7

-------
                                          (6)
children  with levels between 0.5 and 2.26 ppni.
Levels in fat were consistently higher than those in
plasma. The mean concentration in adipose tissue
was reported as J 965 ±356 ppb in quarantined farm-
ers and 516±92 ppb in nonquarantined farmers (5).
  Breast milk is rich in fat, and serves as a route of
eliminating PBBs.  PBB levels are much  higher in
mijk than in blood serum (13). The  Michigan  De-
partment of Public Health conducted studies in 1976
to learn the percentage of women who were passing
PBBs into breast  milk. Random sampling of 53
women in the lower peninsula showed that 96% of
their  milk samples contained  PBBs; 63% were
below 0.1 ppm, 32% were between 0.1 and 1 ppm,
and 1  sample was above 1 ppm. Similar sampling of
42 women in the upper peninsula disclosed PBBs in
43% of the specimens; 98% were below 0.1 ppm and
1 sample was between 0.1 and 0.5 ppm (7).
  In 1976, PBBs. were still present in 26 of 28 culti-
vated fields which had been highly contaminated
two years  earlier.  Additionally,  soils where con-
taminated milk had been dumped contained PBBs at
levels up to 1 ppm. Stockpiles of decomposing ma-
nure contained about 1.5 ppm, and manured garden
soils contained up to 0.035 ppm  of PBBs  (56).
  PBBs have been identified in the fat of deer, rab-
bits, coyote', ravens, and ducks  (44,  45, 57). They
were also found in herring gull eggs at six different
Michigan locations on the Great Lakes (45) and in
fish taken from the Pine River (44).

FDA Guidelines for PBB Levels in Food and
Animal Feed

  In May 1974, the FDA set guidelines of 1.0 ppm
of PBB in the fat of milk, meat and poultry, 0.1 ppm
in whole  eggs and 0.3 ppm in animal  feeds. In
November 1974,-the FDA reduced the guidelines to
0.3 ppm  in the  fat of milk, meat and poultry, and
0.05 ppm in whole eggs and animal  feeds. In July
1977,  the Michigan state legislature voted to lower
their guidelines for PBBs in cattle to 0.02 ppm, an
action which may require the destruction of 34,000
cows  (55).

Health Effects

Structural Considerations

  The physical'and chemical  characteristics of
PBBs favor long periods of residence in  living or-
ganisms. Their high solubility in fat results in stor-
age, in andipose tissues; their  chemical stability
minimizes change to more water-soluble, more
readily excretable  molecules; their polarity favors
nonspecific adsorption to tissue  macromolecules
and plasma proteins; their molecular weight favors
enterohepatic recirculation; and their polybromina-
tion blocks sites  where  biphenyl would  be
metabolized by hydroxylation.
  Various studies have shown that PBBs concen-
trate in adipose tissue; they would also be expected
to be collected in Kupffer cells of the liver,  and.
perhaps by macrophages. While PBB levels in th?
body would decline slowly  under normal condi-
tions, physiological changes, such as loss of weight,
parturition and  lactation, would  mobilize  PBBs
from tissue  reservoirs with their  release into the
systemic circulation.

Disposition in  Man and Lower Animals

  A wide variety of animal species  have been found
to absorb PBBs. These species include man, cow,
pig,  dog, mink,  guinea pig, rat, mouse, Japanese
quail, gull, chicken, and  fish. The most definitive
quantitative study showed  that rats absorbed at
least 90%  of I4C-labeled  2,2!,4,4',5,5'-hexa-
bromobiphenyl administered by gavage in doses up
to 30 mg/kg even when the material was adminis-
tered on four consecutive days (59). BP-6 blood
levels of 2 /ig/ml were observed  in  children  and
adults on quarantined  farms (6).  Much higher
plasma concentrations (24-41 pig/ml) were reached
in cows given a single 3-gram dose of encapsulated
BP-6 (60).
  Information  on OBB absorption is less clear. A
study in rats showed that  62% of a single oral dose
of I4C- OBB was eliminated in the feces during the
first  day (25).  This  finding may indicate that  the
compound was not completely absorbed.
  No information is available on the extent of ab-
sorption of DBB.
  Studies with radiolabeled PBBs  were' performed
in rats. The levels of radioactivity in adipose tissue,
skin, muscle and liver were measured for 6 weeks
after  intravenous administration of HC-2,2',4,-
4',5,5'-hexabromobiphenyl (59). After 1  day, mus-
cle contained more than 40% of the isotope and the
liver contained more than 10%.  These concentra-
tions fell sharply, and at 7 days muscle retained only
5% and  the liver less than 2% of the administered
radioactivity. Most of this radioactivity was  redis-
tributed to the fat, which contained  about 25% of
the label on day 1 and 60% on day 7. During  the
subsequent 5 weeks, muscle and liver slowly lost
radioactivity while adipose tissue became enriched.
The quantity of 14C in skin was within the range of
15-20%  of the dose  over the entire 6-week period.
Similar  patterns  were observed after the oral ad-
ministration  of  radiolabeled   2,2',4,4',5,5'-
hexabromobiphenyl, indicating that the initial tissue

-------
distribution and subsequent redistribution of this
compound are independent of the route of adminis-
tration (59). Another study showed the presence of
much higher levels of "C in fat, adrenal gland, heart
and skin than in liver, pancreas and spleen 16 days
after administering a single oral dose of "C- OBB
(25). When nonradioactive OBB was fed daily to
rats, the bromine concentration in the adipose tis-
sue and liver  increased steadily,  with no plateau
during the entire' 6 months of the  study (25). The
accumulation of bromine in the fat, liver and muscle
of rats was shown to be related to the concentration
of OBB m the  diet (61,, 62), Bromine from OBB did
not accumulate in rat kidney, skeletal muscle or
testis (25). There are no data on the tissue distribu-
tion of DBB.
  A study in laying chickens  showed the presence
of 12% of the BP-6 does in muscle, 10% in adipose
tissue, and 2% in liver (63).
  A  study in Holstein dairy calves indicated that
PBB  levels  in muscle, fat,  liver,  and kidney in-
creased with the dose (64).  PBB accumulation in
these tissues was especially evident when the dose
was increased  from 10 mg/kg to 100 mg/kg. A study
in lactating cows showed that PBBs entered  the
bone  marrow in a dose-related manner (65).  PBBs
have also been found in the adrenal, brain, heart,
kidney, fiver, mammary gland, muscle, spleen, and
thyroid of cows (60, 64-67) and sheep (66), in the
bile, lung, lymph nodes, ovary, rumen wall, spinal
cord, spleen, synovial fluid, testis, thymus, tongue,
and uterus of cattle (60) and in chicken muscle and
liver (63).
  Humans store PBBs in fat, where concentrations
up to 370 (13) and 15,000 (/5) times higher than the
blood levels have been reported. A study of 16 men
and women, indicated that fat levels of PBB  de-
creased 39% in 6 months (7).
  PBBs are capable of passing through the placenta!
barrier into the developing fetuses of cows (68) and
rats (61, 69).
  The  excretion   of "C-2,2',4,4',5,5'-hexa-
bromotyphenyl by rats was extremely slow (59).
After the intravenous administration of a  single
dose, only 6.6% of the label was excreted in feces
over  a period of 6  weeks and  the  total urinary
excretion was less than 0.1%. Mathematical  ex-
trapolation of the excretion  data "indicates that
only 9.5% of the total PBB dose would ever be ex-
creted in the feces"  (59).
  OBB was eliminated much faster by rats (25).
After a single oral dose of "C- OBB, 65% of the
isotope appeared in the feces in 1 day and a total of
73% was excreted in feces  in 16 days. The extensive
elimination in  24 hr may reflect incomplete absorp-
tion.
  A pig excreted only 1% of a single intraperitoneal
dose of BP-6 in urine and feces in 7 days (70).
  Approximately 58% of the dose fed to laying
chickens was deposited in eggs; 11% was found in
excreta (65). Gulls also transfer PBB to their eggs
(45). Cows excrete far more PBB in feces than in
urine (60); approximately 50% of a single PBB dose
was excreted in feces in 7 days and 24% of the dose
was excreted with the milk over a period of 95 days.
  It is well known that PBBs pass into human milk
(5, 7, 13), but there are no data on the urinary and
fecal excretion of these compounds. Further, there
is  no information on  excretion via the skin; this
route may be important for PBBs because lipids (71)
and halogenated hydrocarbons (72) are excreted by
glands  in the skin, primarily  by  sebaceous glands
associated with hair follicles.

HaBlT-Lif® sund  BiofflcciflinnnuiSaltBOirii

  The  biological  or elimination half-life of a sub-
stance  is determined from a semilogarithmic plot of
the concentration of the substance in blood plasma
(on a logarithmic scale)  against  time (on a linear
scale).  The plot describes a straight line, and the
time required for this concentration at any point on
the line to decrease by one-half is the biological
half-life.  In many cases, plotting tissue levels gives
lines with the same slope as the lines obtained from
plasma levels. In order to obtain reliable  half-life
values, studies are performed over periods of four
to six half-lives.
  Obviously, the repeated exposure of a living or-
ganism to a substance with a long half-life results in
bioaccumulation.
  The  most striking study on this topic dealt with
14C-2,2',4,4',5,5'-hexabromobiphenyl in the rat, and
concluded that "extrapolation of the rate of excre-
tion  to infinity indicates that less than 10% of the
total dose would ever be excreted" (59).  Data ob-
tained in a study of UC- OBB in rats was interpreted
to indicate biphasic fecal excretion; the half-life of
the first  phase  was considered to have been less
than 24 hr, while the half-life of the  second phase
was clearly greater than 16 days (25). However, one
may question the existence of the short  half-life
phase in the absence of data establishing the com-
plete absorption  of OBB by the oral  route. This
point can be clarified by investigating the excretion
of >4C- OBB after intravenous administration. Fur-
ther, this report on OBB is difficult to reconcile with
the observation that bromine levels in the fat of rats
dosed with OBB did not decrease during a period of
18 weeks after cessation of dosing (61, 62).
  PBB excretion in cow milk was observed to  be
biphasic (32). The half-life for the first phase has

-------
                                              (8)
been estimated as 10.5 days (66) and that for the
second phase as 58 days (67). Data from another
study indicated that cow milk would decrease from
200-400 ppm of BP-6 in fat to 0.3 ppm in 120 weeks
(73).
  Eggs laid by hens after cessation of BP-6 feeding
showed decreasing levels of PBBs. From  the data,
the half-life  of PBB elimination by this route was
calculated to be 17 days (63). A more specific report
on this type of PBB elimination placed the half-life
of hexabromobiphenyl at 28 days and the half-life of
heptabromobiphenyl at 20 days (74).
  The half-life of PBBs in man has been estimated
to be in the order of 10-11 months (75),  although
there are  data showing no significant decrease  in
plasma levels for 5 months (13)
  The long biological half-life of PBBs in avian, ro-
dent, bovine, and primate species indicates that
PBB bioconcentration occurred upon repeated in-
gest ion. It has been amply demonstrated that BP-6
accumulates quickly in fish and that the bioconcen-
tration factor can exceed  10,000 (2, 24, 44, 75).
However, the bioaccumulation of OBB  occurred
measurably in rats (23, 60), but not in fish  (25). It is
clear that humans experienced the bioconcentration
of BP-6 due to storage in fat where concentrations
were more than 4000 times the serum levels (5).

Biotransformation

  PBBs are  capable of biotransformations  which
would yield large numbers of isomeric products.  In
general, these biotransformations will  proceed
slowly, but  the stereochemistry varies so widely
among PBBs that some reactions will proceed much
faster  than others. The major expected end prod-
ucts would be sulfates, glucuronides, and mercap-
turic acids. The higher molecular weight metabo-
lites would be excreted slowly due to their entrance
into the enterohepatic circulation whereas  the lower
molecular weight metabolites  would be  excreted
quickly by the kidney.
  Definitive work on the biotransformation of PBBs
has yet to be done. One publication states that ap-
proximately 1% of the BP-6 administered to a pig
w'as excreted as a monohydroxypentabromo-
biphenyl (70). However, it is not clear whether this
metabolite was formed from hexabromobiphenyl
,(by  reductive debromination followed by hy-
droxylation) or directly from pentabromobiphenyl
(by hydroxylation). Similarly, there is a single re-
port which suggests the formation of  monohy-
droxydibromobiphenyl in fish (75). Another paper
implies that fish may debrominate the more highly
brominated components of PBB mixtures (24). No
unconjugated PBBs could be detected in  the urine
of cows given single 3-gram doses of BP-6 (60), and
no metabolites of any kind were found in the feces
of rats dosed intravenously and orally with radioac-
tive 2,2',4,4',5,5'-hexabromobiphenyl (59).

Biochemical Pharmacology

  PBBs induce oxidative microsomal  enzymes  in
the liver of dogs (76), Japanese quail (77), adult rats
(27, 69, 78-84), and neonatal rats (69, 83) and in the
kidney and  mammary gland of maternal rats (69,
84). PBBs also induce enzymes in liver cytosol and
mitochondria; this was reflected by the elevation  of
serum levels of glutamic-oxalacetic transaminase
(SOOT) in rats (27) and cows (55), and lactic dehy-
drogenase in cows (55). Additionally, these com-
pounds appear to enhance the  catabolism of
thyroxine and male sex hormones in cockerels, and
of estrogens in hens (63) and Japanese quail (21).  It
also  appears that PBBs  may change the estrogen-
progesterone balance in cows (55,  56), mink (57),
and mice (55).
  Test compounds administered to rodents dosed
with BP-6 were cleared  more rapidly from plasma
and excreted more rapidly in bile (59-97). BP-6 de-
creased the toxicity of ouabain in rats by accelerat-
ing the rate of ouabain removal from the blood and
liver (97). This stimulation of hepatic transport was
classified as "a significant drug interaction."


Effects on  Animals
  Acute Effects.  The acute oral LDSO of BP-6 has
been reported to be approximately 21.5 g/kg for rats
(92,  93).  Although  this dose is very high, it  is
noteworthy  that  indications of systemic toxicity
(such as emaciation) occurred after the oral admin-
istration of 10 g/kg (92). The acute oral toxicity of
OBB is greater than 2 g/kg for rats and  greater than
12.5 g/kg for Japanese quail (67). The oral LDSO of
decabromobiphenyl (DBB) is higher than 20 g/kg in
the rat (94).
  BP-6 was more toxic than OBB or DBB when
applied to the skin of rabbits. The approximate le-
thal doses were stated to be 5 g/kg for BP-6 (95),
greater than 10 g/kg for OBB (95) and greater than 8
g/kg for DBB (94). Another study placed the acute
dermal toxicity of BP-6 in the range of 2.15-10.0
g/kg (93).
  Rats did not die as the result of inhaling BP-6 dust
at a concentration of 71.1 mg/1. of air for 1  hr, but
became emaciated after four such  exposures (94).
Rats were unaffected by exposure to OBB dust at a
level of 0.96 mg/1. for 4 hr (26) and by the inhalation
of DBB at a level of 200 mg/1. for 1 hr (94).
  OBB caused  transient irritation  of conjunctiva!

-------
membranes, but not of the cornea, iris, or lens, of
the rabbit eye (27, 94, 95). BP-6 (94) and DBB (94)
were stated to have no irritative effects on these eye
tissues. However,  fats exposed  to 5 mg of DBB
dust/1, air for 6 hr on 5 consecutive days showed mild
dyspnea and eye irritation (27).
  Inspecting the toxicological  data shows that
PBBs act slowly. In the acute oral toxicity study of
BP-6, the first rat to die on the second highest dose
(10 g/kg) did so 13 days after dosing (92). In the
same  study, the first rat to die on the highest dose
(21.5 g/kg) did so 6 days after dosing and the second
rat died on day 9. Deaths were also delayed in the
acute dermal toxicity study of BP-6 in rabbits; four
of the 15 animals died 5, 7,  8, and  14 days after
dosing (92).  There was a similar finding with DBB;
the rabbit which died in the dermal toxicity test did
so on day 14 (94). One report classified this delayed
mortality as "semichronic toxicity" (96). This term
was used to describe the observation that 500 ppm
of BP-6 in the diet  of Japanese quail caused deaths
in 3 weeks whereas no birds died after receiving a
much larger quantity (1 g) as a single oral  dose. A
similar finding was the death of 37% of chicks fed a
diet containing  400 ppm of BP-6 for 15 days (97).
  The administration of single doses  of  BP-6 to
pregnant rats  caused fetal  resorption and two
teratogenic  malformations (cleft palate and dia-
phragmatic hernia) (98). At high doses, the pregnant
rodents ate less and their fetuses weighed less than
normal. Another important toxic effect from single
doses of BP-6  was the formation of liver nodules
indicative of potential carcinogenicity in rats (99).
Administering a single dose of OBB to male rats
enlarged the liver and produced changes in  its  ul-
trastructure (100).  A  single dose of BP-6 induced
mixed function oxidases (MFOs) for prolonged
periods in Japanese quail .(77).
   Chronic Effects.  The chronic administration of
PBBs has been observed to produce a wide variety
of biological  effects in many  animal species.
Perhaps the most  significant adverse .effects were
the expression of teratogenicity  (cleft palate and
exencephaly) in mice (101, 102), the suppression of
humoral immunity in guinea pigs (97), and the sup-
pression of cell-mediated immune mechanisms in
mice and rats (103, 104).
   PBBs adversely affect reproduction by different
 species, These compounds decrease the  comb
 weight of cockerels (63. 97), and decrease the fertil-
 ity of mink  (57), hens (63), and Japanese quail (63).
 They induce fetal  resorption in mice (88, 105) and
 ruts (98), and abortion in cows (85. 86). Addition-
 ally. PBBs reduce the survival  rate of newborn
 calves (88), mink (57), mice  (88), and  chicks (63),
 and reduce  the hatchability of avian eggs (63, 106).
  Other effects of PBBs which have been noted in
different species include: reduced feed consumption
by cows (55,86,55, 707), rats (75,108) and chickens
(63,109); liver enlargement in cows (56), dogs (76),
rats (62, 64, 69, 78, 81, 84, 88, 91, 110), guinea pigs
(97),  mice  (90, 91, 102), chicks (63, 97), and
Japanese quail (21, 63, 96); increased liver micro-
somal enzyme activity in dogs (76), rats (69, 75, 79,
52, 59,707,110), mice (55,101), and Japanese quail
(27); and reduced hematocrit values in chickens (63)
and rats (25). PBBs have also been observed to pro-
duce thyroid and testis weight increases in cock-
erels (63), and kidney weight increases in rats (25).
It is interesting that hyperkeratosis was observed on
the eyelids of cows dosed orally with BP-6 (56) and
on the interior surface of the ears of rabbits after
application of the so-called "polar"  fraction (99).
The term "polar" was used in a relative sense; no
components of the fraction have been identified.
  BP-6 acted synergistically with colchicine to in-
crease the  rate of mitosis in rat bone marrow; no
chromosomal aberrations were observed (777).
Other  noteworthy effects of BP-6 in rats are re-
duced adipose tissue weight,  elevated  plasma
cholesterol  levels,  increased liver lipid and de-
creased liver RNA (707).
  Abnormalities in the synthesis of heme result in
the formation of large quantities of porphyrin. This
disorder,  called porphyria, was produced  in
Japanese quail fed BP-6  (96, 7/2, 113). The ac-
cumulation of porphyrins  was on a macroscopic
scale in the bile, liver, kidney, intestine, and bone of
the birds (96). The accumulation in the liver was
attributed to damage to the mitochondria (7/2).
  Minimum Effective Doses.  Table 2 shows the
lowest doses of PBBs found to have adverse effects
in animals. When possible,  these doses are ex-
pressed as ppm of  either commercial hexa-
bromobiphenyl  (BP-6)  or  commercial  octa-
bromobiphenyl (OBB) in the diet.

Effifecite om Hturaainis

  It is clear that hundreds of thousands (1/6) if not
millions (117,  118) of people have ingested food
products containing PBBs. It is also clear that man,
being at the top of the food chain, has bioconceh-
trated the very slowly excreted PBBs. The effects
of PBBs on human health, however, have  been
clouded by controversy. Following is an effort to
re-evaluate the  information  from  a scientific
standpoint aided by recent findings.
  The expression, short-term effects, connotes a
cause  and  effect relationship which is measurable
within minutes, hours, or days. Review of the avail-
able information indicates that there is no informa-

-------
                              (10)
Table 2. Minimum effective doses of PBBs In diet (or by gavage as noted).
                               BP-6° (Ref.)
OBB" (Ref.)
Cows
Reduced feed intake
Decreased body weight
Liver enlargement
Abortions
Reduced progeny survival
Altered heart, respiratory function
Severe debilitation, death
Kidney, liver, skin pathology
Dogs
Liver enlargement
Induced MFOs
Mink
Reduced litter size
Reduced progeny survival
Nursing rats
Induced MFOs
Rats
Reduced feed intake
Thyroid enlargement
Liver enlargement
Liver histopathology .
Induced MFOs
Kidney enlargement
Reduced fetal weight
Cleft palate in fetus
Reduced hematocrit
Liver nodules
Immunosuppression
Guinea pigs
Liver enlargement
Mice
Liver enlargement
Induced MFOs
Reduced progeny survival
Reduced fetal weight
Cleft palate in fetus
Exencephaly in fetus
Immunosuppression
Nursing mice
Liver enlargement
Induced MFOs
Hens
Reduced feed consumption
Reduced egg production
Reduced egg hatchability
Reduced progeny survival
Reduced progeny growth
Chicks
Reduced weight gain
Reduced body weight
Liver enlargement <
Thyroid enlargement
Decreased comb weight
Increased testis weight
Decreased spleen weight ^
Reduced hematocrit
Reduced hemoglobin
Increased hydropericardium

5,000 ppm (85. 88)
5,000 ppm (85. 88. 114)
5,000 ppm (115)
5,000 ppm (850
10 ppm (88)
5,000 ppm (88, 114)
5,000 ppm (88. 114)
5,000 ppm (88. 115)

1 mg/kg (76 )r
1 mg/kg (76Y

1 ppm (87)
1 ppm (87)

1 ppm (88)

500 ppm (78)
100 ppm (25)
5 ppm (78) 100 ppm (25. 61)
100 ppm (61, 62)
5 ppm (78. 80. 81)
1.000 ppm (25)
100 ppm (102)
200 mg/kg W
10,000 ppm (25)
i g/kg (wr
30 mg/kg (103)

500 ppm (97)

50 ppm (84. W)
50 ppm (84)
200 ppm (105)
50 ppm (102)
50; 1.000 ppm (101. 102)
[00 ppm (101. 102)
30 mg/kg (103)

50 ppm (VI )
1 ppm (88)

125 ppm (63)
20 ppm (10V)
10 ppm 1/06)
30 ppm (63)
45 ppm (63)

10 ppm (106)
75 ppm (6J)
50 ppm (63)
100 ppm (63)
50 ppm (63):
200 ppm (63)
100 ppm (63)
75ppm(6J)
75 ppm (63)
75 ppm (63)

-------
                                               (11)
Table 2 (Continued)
                                                BP-6° (Ref.)
                                  OBB" (Ref.)
Japanese quail
  Reduced feed consumption
  Reduced egg production
  Reduced egg hatchability
  Induced MFCs
SCOppma/)
ICOppm(2/)
100ppm(2/)
 20ppm(2/)
  • Commercial hexabromobiphenyl
  * Commercial octabromobiphenyl.
 / Administered by gavage.
 tion on the effects of PBBs in man within this time
 frame.
   The first effects of PBBs were observed in cattle
 in September 1973 (116) as a result of feeding Farm
 Bureau pellets purchased during July and fed to the
 animals in  August  1973  (119). Another version of
 the  timetable states  that sick cows were noticed
 after one week of feeding the contaminated pellets
 (119). In any  case, it is  evident that the Michigan
 Department of Public Health began its  study of
 pe'ople exposed to PBBs during the summer of 1974
 (119) and presented their report on March 19, 1975.
 Thus, their findings reflect the health of people who
 ingested  PBBs for periods up to 20 months, and
 cannot be considered to have been short term.
   The 189 adults investigated by  the Michigan De-
 partment of Public Health presented the following
 list  of  complaints: numbness, balance problems,
 nausea,  stomach pain, appetite change,  weight
 change, liver  trouble, hepatitis, fainting, loss of
 power,  blurred vision,  light sensitivity, thyroid
 trouble, headache,  fatigue, irritability,  anxiety,  de-
 pression, pink eye,  rash,  sores, acne, skin color
 change, and hair/fingernail change.
   After conducting physical examination and lab-
 oratory tests, the department concluded: ".
 there has been no  consistent pattern of illness or
 symptoms which occurred excessively in exposed
 persons."
   The  preceding conclusion  was challenged, and
 one well-qualified medical research director (116)
 wrote a critique stating that the study was "poorly
 planned, does not conform  to  the standards of
 adequate scientific medical  and epidemiological
 evaluation, was incomplete,  probably biased and
 does not support the  conclusions reached and pub-
 lished by the lay press. The study has not been pub-
 lished in the scientific literature, and it  probably
 would not be accepted for publication in a bona-fide
 scientific journal with a competent and  unbiased
 editorial review board,"
   A study was made of lymphocytes from 75 New
 York City residents, 46 Wisconsin dairy farmers
 and 45 Michigan residents (720). With one excep-
 tion, the lymphocytes i of all of the New York  and
 Wisconsin subjects showed normal T and B  cell
 counts and immunological activities. Of the Michi-
 gan people, 27 had similarly  normal lymphocytes.
  Lymphocytes from the other 18 Michigan subjects
  were low in T cells. Further, their T cells contained
  a high proportion of null (immunologically incom-
  petent) cells. The total number of effective T cells in
  these 18 people was only 5-10% of normal.
    A dermatological study was made of 1029 people
  from Grand Rapids, Michigan and a control group
  of 221  people from Wisconsin (121). The incidence
  of halogenacne (21/1029) and of unexplained hair
  loss (23/1029)  in the Michigan group were highly
  significant  because none of the Wisconsin group
  showed these conditions.
     In November 1976, a group of 343 children (ages
  0-16) from rural Michigan were studied for possible
  PBB effects (722).  In March 1977, 72 children (ages
  0-16) from Wisconsin dairy farms were investigated
  similarly. Rather arbitrarily, the children were di-
  vided  into three groups; namely,  Michigan
  symptomatic (120), Michigan asymptomatic (223)
  and Wisconsin asymptomatic (71) groups. The
  Michigan asymptomatic group differed significantly
  from the Wisconsin asymptomatic group by greater
  prevalence of tiredness, decreased appetite and
  diarrhea.  It was concluded that: "There  exists a
  reasonable basis to suspect that ingested PBBs do
  have acute adverse  effects on the health of chil-
  dren" and that "symptoms of ill health can be in-
  distinguishably produced by acute,  high-level in-
  gestion and  by chronic,  low-level  ingestion of
  PBBs."
     In five liver function tests, at least five times as
  many  Michigan as Wisconsin residents showed ab-
  normalities (123). The incidence of abnormalities in
  the Michigan group (who had been exposed to
  PBBs) was 5-1 \% in the various tests. Abnormal
  liver function  tests had been reported earlier by a
  private physician treating patients exposed to PBBs
  (124).
     Among the hazardous effects of PBBs on animals
   are teratogenicity, immunosuppression, and poten-
   tial carcinogenicity in rodents.  Other distinctly un-
   toward effects are hypothyroidism in rats and chick-
   ens, testosterone destruction in cockerels, inanition
   in bovine, rodent, and avian species, and porphyria,
   reduced egg production, reduced egg hatchability,

-------
                                                         (12)
and reduced progeny survival in birds. The enlarged
livers and high levels of liver enzymes induced by
PBBs in bovine, canine, rodent and avian species
appear to be relevant to man, but this matter has not
been pursued in the clinic.
  It is not  surprising that the  information gained
from PBB studies fails to answer a host of important
questions and therefore precludes extrapolation of
findings  in  lower species to expectations  in man.
There are two underlying reasons for this situation.
First, commercial PBBs are mixtures of many com-
pounds and these  compounds  have seldom been
studied individually. Thus, it is impossible to draw
structure/activity  relationships.  Indeed,  specific
toxic effects cannot  be  assigned  to  specific
molecules.  This disadvantage  is  worsened by the
fact that similar chemical compounds may act addi-
tively, antagonistically or synergistically.  Second,
the metabolism of PBBs remains almost totally un-
known. This means that the various components of
PBBs may  be converted to metabolites which are
also capable of additive, antagonistic or synergistic
activities in different experimental and clinical set-
tings.
  The resistance of at least  some PBBs to enzymic
attack, coupled with their long biological half-life,
assures, the bioconcentration  of these compounds
by  man. This process of accumulation is now con-
tinuing  and may produce some manifestation of
toxicity at any time, possibly in Michigan residents
of some  specific genetic description.
  The authors are grateful for the competent assistance of Mr.
William A. Coniglio, Mr. Thomas Kopp, Ms. Cindy McMillin,
Dr. George Parris, and Mr. Michael J. Weaver.
                    REFERENCES
  1. Anderson, E. V. Government rules: Problems, oppor-
    tunities. Chem. Eng. News, 54: p. 12 (Mar. 22. 1976).
  2. Mumma, C. E., and Wallace,  D. D. Survey of industrial
    processing data. Task ,11—Pollution potential of polybrom-
    inated biphenyls. EPA-560/3-75-004, June 1975.
  3. Carter, L.  J. Michigan's PBB  incident: Chemical mix-up
    leads to disaster. Science 192: 240 (1976).
  4. Anonymous. Is PBB a human health hazard? Mich. Med.
    75: 560 (1976).  '
  5. Meester, W. D., and McCoy, D. J. Human toxicology of
    polybrominated biphenyls. Paper presented at Symposium
    on Environmental Toxicology, Seattle, Washington, Aug.
    4, 1976.      _.
  6. Isbister, J. L. The short term effects of PBB  on health.
    Michigan Dept. of Public Health report, Feb. 23, 1977.
  7. Eyster, J. T. Breast milk studies. Michigan Dept. of Public
    Health,  Nov. 18, 1976.
    Selikoff, I. J., qt al. Health effects of exposure to poly-
    brominated biphenyls. Results of a clinical field survey.
    Nov. 4-10, 1976. Interim summary report to National In-
    stitute of Environmental Health Sciences ES 00928.
8.
 9.  Kay, K. Polybrominated biphenyls (PBB) environmental
    contamination in Michigan, 1973-1976. Environmental Res.
    13:74(1977).
10.  Corbett, T. H. The FireMaster incident.  In: Cancer and
    Chemicals. Nelson-Hall, Chicago, 1977, pp. 121-145.
II.  Meester, W. D., and McCoy, D. J. Human toxicology of
    polybrominated biphenyls. Clin. Toxicol. 10: 474 (1977).
12.  Wallach, D. P. Livestock poisoning. Chem. Eng. News 55:
    43 (July II, 1977).
13.  Humphrey, H. E. B., and Hayner, N. S.  Polybrominated
    biphenyls: An agricultural incident and its consequences.
    II.  An epidemiological investigation of human exposure.
    Trace Subst. Environ. Health 9: 57 (1975).
14.  Anonymous. Polybrominated biphenyls,  polychlorinated
    biphenyls, pentachlorophenyl—and all that. Lancet, 00: 19
    (July 2, 1977).
15.  Isbister, J. L. PBBs in human health. Clin. Med. 84:  22
    (1977).
16.  Sundstrom, G.,  et al. The  synthesis and gas chromato-
    graphic properties of bromobiphenyls. Sci. Total Environ.
    6: 15 (1976).
17.  Jacobs, L. W., Chou, S. F., and Tiedje, J. M. Fate of poly-
    brominated biphenyls (PBBs) in soils: Persistence and plant
    uptake. J. Agr. Food Chem. 24: 1198 (1976).
18.  O'Keefe, P. W. Preliminary report.. Analysis of environ-
    mental samples for trace components from polybrominated
    biphenyl fire retardants. Presented to the Subcommittee on
    Conservation and Credit,  Committee on Agriculture,
    United States House of Representatives. April 30, 1976.
19.  Kerst, A. F. Polybrominated biphenyls. Technical presen-
    tation concerning operations of Michigan Chemical Corpo-
    ration, St.  Louis, Michigan, to Michigan Environmental
    Review Board, Sept. 23, 1974.
20.  Hass, J. R., McConnell, E. E., and Harvan, D. J. Chemical
    and toxicologic  evaluation  of FireMaster BP-6. J. Agr.
    Food Chem. 26: 94 (1978).
21.  Babish. J. G., Gutenmann, W. H., and Stoewsand, G. S.
    Polybrominated biphenyls: tissue distribution and effect on
    hepatic microsomal enzymes in Japanese quail. J. Agr.
    Food Chem. 23:879(1975);
22.  Norstrom, A., Anderson, K., and Rappe, C. Major compo-
    nents of some brominated aromatics used as fire retardants.
    Chemosphere 4:  255 (1976).
23.  Sundstrom, G., Hutzinger, O., and Safe, S. Identification
    of 2,2',4,4',5,5'-hexabromobiphenyl as the major compo-
    nent of flame retardant FireMaster BP*6. Chemosphere 5:
    11(1976).
24.  Zitko, V. The accumulation of polybrominated biphenyls
    by fish. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 17: 285 (1977).
25.  Norris, J. M., et al. Toxicology and environmental factors
    involved in the selection of decabromodiphenyl oxide as a
    fire retardant chemical.  Appl. Polymer  Symp. 22: 195
    (1973).
26.  Warifz, R. S., et al.  Toxicological evaluations of  some
    brominated biphenyls. Am. Ind. Hyg. Assoc. J. 38: 307
    (1977).
27.  Huntingdon Research Centre. Subacute inhalation toxicity
    to the rat of Flammex B 10. Jan. 12, 1973.
28.  Filonow, A. B., Jacobs, L. W., and Mortland. M. M. Fate
    of polybrominated biphenyls (PBBs) in soils. Retention of
    hexabromobiphenyl in four Michigan soils. J. Agr.  Food
    Chem. 24: 1201 (1976).
29.  Andersson, K., et al. Photochemical degradation of PCB.
    PBB and other flame retardants. In: Environmental Quality
    and Safety, F. Coulston and F. Korte, Eds., Suppl. Vol
    111, Georg Thieme Stullgart, 1975, p. 798.
30.  Ruzo, L. O., and Zabik, M. J. Polyhalogenated biphenyls.
    Photolysis of hexabromo and hexachlorobiphenyls.  Bull.

-------
    Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 13: 181 (1975).
31. Ruzo, L. O., et al. Environmental chemistry of flame retar-
    dants. 4. Photodegradation of polybrominated biphenyls     52.
    (PBB). J. Agr. Food Chem. 24:  1062 (1976).
32. Fries, G. F., and Marrow, G. S. Excretion of polybrom-
    inated biphenyls into the milk of cows. J. Dairy Sci. 58:947
    (1975).                                                   53.
33. Fehringer,  N. V.  Determination of polybrominated
    biphenyl residues in dairy products. J. Assoc. Off. Anal.
    Chem. 58: 978 (1975).
34. Fehringer,  N. V.  Determination of polybrominated
    biphenyl residues in dry animal feeds. J. Assoc. Off. Anal.     54.
    Chem, 58: 1206 (1975).
35. Erickson, M. D., Zweidinger, R. A., and Pellizzari, E. D.
    Analysis of a series of samples of polybrominated biphenyls
    (PBBs).  EPA-560/6-77-020.  Aug. 1977.
36. Jenker, H. Process for the production of bromine deriva-     55.
    lives of aromatic compounds. U. S. Pat. 3,285,965 assigned
    to Chemische Fabrik Kalk G. m.b.H., Cologne-Kalk, Ger-
    many (Nov.  15. 1966).                                     56.
37. Mitchell, L.  C. Process for production  of polybrominated
    aromatics. U. S. Pat 3,763,248 (assigned to Ethyl Corp.)
    (Oc,t. 2,  1973).                                            57.
38. Fujii, H., and Ohno, I. Highly brominated  biphenyls.
    Japan. Pat. 74-11,689 (assigned to Toyo Soda Mfg. Co.,
    Ltd.) (Mar. 19, 1974).
39. Moore, D. E., Mills, J. F., and  Schneider, J. A. Bromina-     58.
    don  with bromine chloride under pressure. U. S. Pat.
    3,845,146 (assigned to Dow Chemical Co.) (Oct. 29, 1974).      59.
40. Neufeld, M.  L., Sittenfield, M., and Wolk, K. F.  Market
    input/output  studies, task IV: polybrominated biphenyls.
    EPA-560/6-77-017. Aug. 1977.                               60.
41. Kerst, A. F.  Letter to D. S. Bryson, EPA Region V. Nov.
    11, 1976.
42. Environmental Science and Engineering,  Inc. Survey of     61.
    polybrominated biphenyls (PBBs) near sites of manufacture
    and use  in northeastern New Jersey. EPA Contact No. 68-
    01-3248. Dec. 1977.                                        62.
43. Fine Organics, Inc., Subsidiary of Hexcel Corp. Applica-
    tion for  certificate to operate control apparatus or equip-
    ment. New  Jersey State Department  of  Environmental     63.
    Protection. Certificate No.  CT 20396 (Jan.  29, 1976).
44. Hesse, J.  L. Water pollution aspects of polybrominated
    biphenyl production: results of surveys in the Pine River in     64.
    the vicinity of St. Louis, Michigan. Presented at the Second
    National Conference on Complete Water Reuse. Water's
    Interface with Energy, Air and Solids. Chicago, May 4-8,     65.
    1975.
45. Tanner,  H.  A. Testimony  on polybrominated biphenyls,
    Senate Commerce Committee Hearings, Mar. 30, 1977.        66.
46. Hesse, J. L.  Michigan Dept. of Natural Resources. Review
    of Gratiot County landfill leaching, Mar. 1, 1977.
47. Benbow, A.  W., and Cullis, C. F. The formation of toxic     67.
    products' during the combustion of halogen-containing
    polymer. Eur. Polym. J. 11: 723 (1975).
48. Michigan Department of Agriculture. Feed and ingredient     68.
    samples tabulation.  Enclosure with letter from  G. L.
    Whitehead, Deputy Director, Bureau of Consumer Protec-     69.
    tion, May 5, 1977.
49. HEW-FDA Division of Chemical Technology. Polybrom-
    inated biphenyls in fish, milk, eggs and cheese. Summary
    report of polybrominated biphenyl  findings. 11/10/74 Ad-     70.
    dendum to FY75 pesticide program (CP 7320.07). April 26,
    1977.                                                    71.
50. Michigan  Department of  Agriculture Laboratory files:
    Polybrominated biphenyl contamination. June 1977.           72.
51. Whitehead, G. L. Statement on polybrominated biphenyls
    (PBBs),  Science and Space Subcommittee of the U. S. Sen-
ate Commerce Committee, Lansing, Michigan, Mar. 31,
1977.
Michigan Department of Agriculture. Finished product
samples for PBB analysis. May 1974-June 1976. Enclosure
with letter from G. L. Whitehead, Deputy Director, Bureau
of Consumer Protection, May 5, 1977.
USDA, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service. Meat
and poultry inspection program. Objective residue sampling
program. Laboratory log sheets from USDA-APH1S Lab-
oratory,  1815  North University,  Peoria, Illinois 61604.
September/October,  1974.
Michigan Department of Agriculture, Food Inspection Divi-
sion. "Market Basket" meat, survey (purchased in Michigan
retail stores). Enclosure with letter from G.  L. Whitehead,
Deputy Director, Bureau of Consumer  Protection, May 5,
1977.
Murata, T., Zabik, M. £., and Zabik, M. Polybrominated
biphenyls in raw milk and processed dairy products. J. Dairy
Sci. 60:516(1977).
Michigan State University. MSU confirms little or no threat
from PBB in soils. News release, Department of Information
Services, East  Lansing, Michigan, Feb.  8, 1977.
Fay, L. D.  Summary of results of analyses for PBB in
wildlife. Memorandum to R. I. Blouch, Michigan  Depart-
ment of Agriculture, Wildlife Pathology Laboratory, Sept.
20,1976.
Anonymous. Michigan lowers action  level; Moss  plans
hearing. Food  Chem. News, 19(18): (July 18, 1977).
Matthews, H.  B.,  et al.  Distribution and excretion of
component of FireMaster BP-6. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health
3: 629 (1977).
Willett, L. B., and Irving, H. A. Distribution and clearance of
polybrominated biphenyls in cows and calves. J.  Dairy Sci.
59: 1429 (1976).
Aftosmis, J. G., et al. Toxicology of brominated biphenyls. I.
Oral toxicity and embryotoxicity. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol.
22:316(1972).
Lee, K. P., et  al. Bromine tissue residues and hepatotoxic
effects of octabromobiphenyl in rats. Toxicol. Appl. Phar-
macol. 34: 115 (1975).
Ringer, R. K.,  and Polin, D. The biological effects of poly-
brominated biphenyls in avian species. Fed. Proc. 36: 1894
(1977).
Industrial Biotest Laboratories, Inc. Toxicity and tissue
residue study  with FireMaster FF-1 in dairy calves. IBT
No. 651-06733, Nov. 5, 1975.
Industrial Biotest Laboratories, Inc. Meat and milk residue
study with FireMaster FF-1 in dairy cattle. IBT No. 651-
06336, June 7, 1976.
Gutenmann, W. H., and Lisk, D. J. Tissue storage and
excretion in milk of polybrominated  biphenyls in  rumi-
nants.  J. Agr.  Food Chem. 23: 1005 (1975).
Fries, G. F., et al. Distribution of polybrominated biphenyl
residues in tissues of dairy cattle. J.  Dairy Sci.  58: 764
(1975).
Detering, C. N., et al. Placenta! transfer of polybrominated
biphenyls by Holstein cows. J. Dairy Sci. 58: 764 (1975).
Dent, J. G., et al. Microsomal enzyme  induction in mater-
nal liver, kidney, mammary glands and neonatal liver fol-
lowing polybrominated biphenyls. Fed.  Proc. 36:  1009
(1977).
Kohli, J., and  Safe, S. The metabolism of brominated aro-
matic compounds. Chemosphere 6: 433 (1976).
Nicolaides, S. Skin lipids: Their biochemical uniqueness.
Science 186: 19 (1974).
Matthews, H. B., Domanski, J. J., and  Guthrie, F. E. Hair
and its associated lipids as an excretory pathway for chlori-
nated hydrocarbons. Xenobiotica 6: 425 (1976).

-------
                                                      (14)
73. Deleting, C. N., et al. On the rate of excretion of poly-      94.
    brominated biphenyls by lactating Holstein. J. Animal Sci.
    41:265(1975).                                             95.
74. Pries, G. F., et al. Retention and excretion of polybrom-
    inated biphenyls by hens. Environ.  Contam. Toxicol. 15:
    278 (1976).
75. Zitko, V., and Hutzinger, 0.  Uptake  of chloro- and      %.
    bromobiphenyls, hexachloro- and hexabromobenzene by
    fish. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 16: 665 (1976).
76. Farber, T. M., et al. The influence of microsomal induction      97.
    on serum alkaline phosphatase activity in dogs. Fed. Proc.
    35: 376 (1976).
77. Cecil, H. C.,  Harris,  S. J., and Bitman,  J; Effects of
    polychlorinated biphenyls and terphenyls and polybrom-      98.
    inated biphenyls on pentobarbital sleeping time of Japanese
    quail. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 3: 183 (1975).          99.
78. Farber, T. M., and Baker, A. Microsomal enzyme induc-
    tion by hexabromobiphenyl. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 29:
    102(1974).
79. Dent, J. G., Netter, K. J., and Gibson, J. E. Characterize-     100.
    tion of various parameters of rat hepatic microsomal mixed
    function oxidase after  induction by polybrominated
    biphenyls. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 37: 147 (1976).          101.
80. Dent, J. G., Netter, K. J., and Gibson, J. E. Spectral prop-
    erties of hepatic cytochrome P-450 induced  by polybrom-
    inated biphenyls. Arch.  Pharmacol. 293  (suppl.); 205     102.
    (1976).
81. Dent, J. G., Netter, K. J., and Gibson, J. E. The induction     103.
    of hepatic microsomal metabolism in rats following acute
    administration of a mixture of polybrominated biphenyls.
    Toxicol. Appl.  Pharmacol. 38: 237 (1976).
82. Dent, J. G., Netter, K. J., and  Gibson, J.  E. Effects of     104.
    chronic administration of polybrominated biphenyls on pa-
    rameters  associated  with  hepatic drug metabolism. Res.
    Commun. Chem. Pathol.  Pharmacol. 13: 75 (1976).
83. Moore, R. W., Dannan, G., and Aust, S.  D. Induction of     105.
    drug metabolizing enzymes in rats nursing from mothers
    fed polybrominated biphenyls. Fed. Proc.  35: 709 (1976).
84. Dent, J. G., Cagen, S. Z.. and McCormack, K. M. Liver
    and mammary  arylhydrocarbon hydroxylase and epoxide     106.
    hydratase in lactating rats fed polybrominated biphenyls.
    Life Sci. 20:2075(1977).
85. Moorhead,  P. p., et al.  Pathology  of experimentally in-     107.
    duced polybrominated biphenyl toxicosis in pregnant heif-
    ers. J. Amer. Vet. Med. Assoc.  170: 307 (1977).
86. Jackson, T. F., and Halbert, F. L. Toxic syndrome associ-     108.
    ated with the feeding of polybrominated biphenyl-contam-
    inated protein concentrate to dairy  cattle. J. Amer. Vet.
    Med. Assoc. 165: 437 (1974).                               109.
87. Michigan Science in Action. MSU research on  PBBs.
    Michigan State University Agricultural Experimental Sta-
    tion. May 1976.
88. PBB Scientific Advisory Panel Report to William G.
    Millken, Governor, State of Michigan, May 24. 1976.         110.
89. Cagen, S. Z., and Gibson, J. E. Stimulation of biliary func-
    tion following  polybrominated biphenyls. Toxicol. Appl.
    Pharmacol. 41: 147(1977).
90. Cagen, S. Z.,Preache, M. M., and Gibson, J. E. Enhanced     111.
    disappearance of drugs from plasma following polybrom-
    inated biphenyls. Toxicol, Appl. Pharmacol. 40:317 (1977).
91. Cagen, S. Z., and Gibson, J. E. Ouabain lethality as a mea-     112.
    sure  of biliary function in developing mice and rats and
    effect of polybrominated biphenyls. Toxicol. Appl. Phar-     113.
    macol. 40: 327 (1977).
92. Hill Top Research, Inc. Acute toxicity and irritation studies
    with FireMaster BP-6 hexabromobiphenyl. 1970.              114.
93. Anonymous. FireMaster BP-6. A new flame retardant ad-
    ditive from Michigan Chemical Corp. Second revision.
    April 26,  1971.
Consumer Product Testing Co., Inc. Final report to
Hexcel-Fine Organics. Mar. 10, 1977.
Aftomis, J. G., et al. Toxicology of brominated biphenyls.
II. Skin, eye, and an acute test method for evaluating
hepatotoxicity and accumulation in body fat.  Toxicol.
Appl. Pharmacol. 22: 316(1972).
Strik, J.J.T.W.A. Toxicity of hexachlorobenzene (HCB)
and hexabromobiphenyl (HBB). Med. Fac. Landbouw-
wetensch. 38:709(1973).
Vos, J. G., and van Gendern, H. lexicological aspects of
ihununosuppression. In: Pesticides and the Environment,
W.  B. Deichmann,  Ed. Intercontinental Medical Book
Corp., New York, 1973, pp. 527-545.
Beaudoin, A. R. Teratogenicity of polybrominated
biphenyls in rats. Environ, Res.  14: 81 (1977).
Kimbrough,  R.  D., et al.  Toxicity of polybrominated
biphenyl,  FF-1 in rats and rabbits: persistence, hepatic.
porphyria, hepatic neoplasia. hyperkeratosis. Lancet, 8038:
602 (Sept. 17, 1977).
Lee, K. P., et al. Octabromobiphenyl-induced ultrastruc-
tural changes in rat  liver. Arch. Environ. Health 30: 465
(1975),
Corbett, T. H., Beaudoin, A.  R., and  Cornell,  R. G.
Teratogenicity of polybrominated  biphenyls. Teratology
11:  I5A(I975).
Corbett, T. H., et al. Toxicity of polybrominated biphenyls
(FireMaster BP-6) in rodents. Environ. Res. 10:390 (1975).
Luster, M. Effects of PBBs on immunocompetence in lab-
oratory animals. Presentation to DHEW Committee to
Coordinate Toxicology and Related Programs, NIH, July
26,  1977:
Moore, J.  A.  Testimony before House of Representatives
Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations of the
Committee on  Interstate and  Foreign  Commerce,
Washington, D. C., Aug. 2, 1977.
Preache, M. M., Cagen, S. Z., and Gibson, J. E. Perinatal
toxicity in mice  following maternal dietary exposure to
polybrominated biphenyls. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 37:
171  (1976).
Lillis, R. J., et al. Toxicity of certain polychlorinated and
polybrominated biphenyls on  reproductive efficiency of
caged chickens. Poultry Sci. 54:  1550 (1975).
Prewitt, L. R., Cook, R. M., and Fries, G. F. Field obser-
vations of Michigan dairy cattle contaminated with poly-
brominated biphenyl. J. Dairy Sci. 58: 763 (1975).
Garthoff, L. H., et al. Biochemical and cytogenic effects in
rats caused by short-term ingestion of Aroclor 1254 or
FireMaster BP-6. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health 3:  1 (1977).
Cecil, H.  C., and Bitman, J. Toxicity of polybromjnated
biphenyl and its effects on reproduction of White Leghorn
hens. Paper presented to section of Pesticides Chemistry,
190th Natl. Mtg., American Chemical Society, August
1975, paper 122.
Babish, J. G., Stoewsand, G. S., and Lisk, D. J. Induction
of tissue microsomal enzymes  and polybrominated
biphenyl metabolism in Brassica fed rats. Fed.  Proc. 35:
376(1976).
Ficsor, G., and Wertz, G.  F. Polybrominated biphenyl non
teratogenic, c-mitosis synergist in rat.  Mutation Res. 38:
388 (1976).
Strik, J.J.T.W.A. Chemical porphyria  in Japanese quail
(Colurnit c. Japonic a). Enzyme  16: 221 (1973).
Strik, J.J.T.W.A. Species differences in experimental por-
phyria caused by polyhalogenated aromatic compounds.
Enzyme 16: 224 (1973).
Irving, H. A.,  et al. The effects of polybrominated
biphenyls  on growth, feed intake, and health of pregnant
heifers. Paper presented at meeting of American Dairy Sci-
ence Association, Raleigh, N. C.. June  1976.

-------
 115. Willett, L. B., et al. The effects of polybrominated
     biphenyls on body organs and changes in blood and urine
     chemistry of pregnant heifers. Paper presented at meeting
     of American Dairy Science Association, Raleigh, N. C.,
     June 1976.
 116. Stadtfeld, C. K. Cheap chemicals and dumb luck. Audu-
     bon, Jan. 1976, p. 110.
 117. Halbert, F. Testimony before Senate Subcommittee on
     Health. April 8, 1976.
118. McGuire, A. Statement before House of Representatives
     Subcommittee  on  Oversight  and  Investigations of the
     Committee on Interstate and Foreign Commerce.
     Washington, D. C., Aug. 2, 1977.
119. Senate Special Investigating Committee on Polybrominated
     Biphenyls. The contamination crisis in Michigan. July,
 .    1975.
12°' tnKrn' J> d- Testimony before House of Representatives
    Subcommittee on Oversight arid Investigations of the
                                   Foreign c°mmerce-
            J: TeStim°ny    on Hous«  of Representatives
                e °n Oversi«hi and Investigations of the
                                   Foreign Commerce>
              .iw
    SlJl" •/; Testimony before House of Representatives
                     Oversi8ht  and Investigations of the
                                   Forei8n  Commerce-
                                     D. Albosta, Mar. 4,
                     ,   Investi8ati«8 Committee on Poly-
             i975            contamination crisis in Michi-

-------