U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
                                      National Technical Information Service

                                                  PB-248  660
COMPILATION OF STATE DATA FOR EIGHT SELECTED TOXIC
SUBSTANCES
VOLUME  I
MITRE  CORPORATION
PREPARED  FOR
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  AGENCY

SEPTEMBER 1975


-------
                           HILJLI1IE
Comparison  of  Energy  Consumption  Be-
tween West Germany and the United States
PB-245 652/PAT   112 p.  PC$5.50/MF$3.00


A  Comprehensive  Policy  to Ameliorate Ad-
verse Impacts of Transportation Facilities
PB-247 823/PAT   138 p.  PCS6.00/MF $3.00


A  Comprehensive  Policy  to Ameliorate Ad-
verse Impacts of  Transporation  Facilities,
Appendix
PB-247 824/PAT   310 p.  PC$9.75/MF$3.00


Demand for Coal for Electricity Generation
1975-1984
PB-245216/PAT   40 p.   PC$4.00/MF$3.00


A  National Study of Adolescent  Drinking
Behavior, Attitudes and Correlates
PB-246 002/PAT  405 p.  PC$11.00/MF$3.00


Energy from Coal: Guidelines for the Prep-
aration of Environmental Impact Statements
PB-242 960/PAT   258 p.  PC$9.00/MF$3.00
Energy Versus the Environment: The Issues
PB-246 3827 PAT  35 p.  PCS4.00/ M F $3.00

Improving  the  Dissemination  of  Scientific
and Technical Information: A  Practitioner's
Guide to Innovation
PB-247 057/ PAT  203 p.  PC$7.75/MF $3.00

Investigation  and Evaluation of Cracking in
Austenitic  Stainless Steel Piping  of Boiling
Water Reactor Plants
PB-246 645/PAT  123 p.  PC$5.50/MF$3.00

Pipeline Industry's Practices  Using Plastic
Pipe in Gas  Pipeline Facilities and the Re-
sulting Safety Factors
PB-247 301 / PAT 436 p.  PC$11.75/MF $3.00

NOx Combustion Control Methods and Costs
for Stationary Sources. Summary Study.
PB-246 750/PAT   117 p.  PC$5.50/MF$3.00

Reactor Safety Study: An Assessment of Ac-
cident Risks in  U.S. Commercial Nuclear
Power Plants
PB-248 200/SET/ PAT  2,504 p.  8 Volumes
                               PCS61.00
                             NATIONAL
                            TECHNICAL
                        INFORMATION
                                SERVICE

    Report on Sulfur Oxide Control Technology
    PB-246 667/ PAT  89 p.  PC$5.00/MF$3.00
    Research Evaluation of a System of Natural
    Air Conditioning
    PB-243 498/PAT 364 p. PC$10.50/MF$3.00

    Retrofitting a Residence for  Solar Heating
    and Cooling: The Design and Construction
    of the System
    PB-247 482/PAT  101 p.  PC$5.50/MF$3.00
    Saudi Arabia Five-Year Plan, 1975-1980
    PB-246 5727 PAT 683 p.  PC$16.25/MF$3.00
    Shotcrete Practice  in  Underground  Con-
    struction
    PB-248 765/PAT 501 p.  PC$12.75/MF$3.00
    Short-Term Coal Forecast, 1975-1980
    PB-247 073/PAT  120 p.  PC$5.50/MF$3.00
    State Energy Information Systems: A Survey
    PB-247 457/PAT  64 p.  PC$4.50/MF$3.00
    A Study  of  Fixed Capital Requirements of
    the U.S. Business Economy
    PB-248 690/ PAT  84 p.  PCS5.00/ M F $3.00
    Sulfates and the Environment—A Review
    PB-248 122/PAT  155 p.  PC$6.75/MF$3.00
HOW TO ORDER
  When you indicate the method of pay-
ment, please note if a purchase order is not
accompanied by payment, you will be billed
an addition $5.00 ship and bill charge. And
please include the card expiration date when
using American Express.
  Normal delivery time takes three to five
weeks. It is vital that you order by number
or your order will be manually filled, in-
suring  a delay. You can opt for airmail
delivery for a  $2.00 charge  per  item. Just
check the  Airmail Service box.  If you're
really pressed for time, call the NTIS Rush
Order  Service.  (703)  557-4700.  For  a
$10.00 charge per item, your order will be
airmailed  within 48  hours.  Or,  you can
pick up your order in the Washington In-
formation  Center  & Bookstore  or at our
Springfield  Operations  Center  within  24
hours for a $6.00 per item charge.
       You may also place your order by tele-
     phone or TELEX. The order desk number
     is (703) 557-4650 and the TELEX number
     is 89-9405.
       Whenever  a foreign sales price is NOT
     specified in the  listings, all foreign buyers
     must add the  following charges to each or-
     der:  $2.50 for each  paper copy; $1.50 for
     each microfiche; and $10.00 for each Pub-
     lished Search.
       Thank you for your interest in NTIS. We
     appreciate  your order.
 METHOD OF  PAYMENT
 Q  Charge my NTIS deposit account no

 Q  Purchase order no
                 NAME-
    Check enclosed for S ____
    Charge to my American Express Card account number
                                                          ADDRESS.
                               J_L
Card expiration date-

Signature 	
   Airmail Services requested
    Clip and mail to:
    National Technical Information Service
    U.S.  DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
    Springfield. Va. 22161
    (703) 557-4650 TELEX 89-9405
     II
                                                          CITY. STATE, ZIP-
        Item Number
                               Quantity
                         Paper Copy
                            (PC)
Microfiche
  (MF)
             Unit Price*
   ~ All Prices Subject to Change
   8/76
                Sub Total
         Additional Charge
         Enter Grand Total
                                                                                                         Totnl Price

-------
EPA 560/7-75-001-1                          Q
     COMPILATION OF STATE DATA FOR
   EIGHT SELECTED TOXIC SUBSTANCES
                 VOLUME I
              FINAL REPORT
               SEPTEMBER 1975
                FINAL REPORT
           U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
              Office of Toxic Substances
               Washington, D.C. 20460

-------
                                    TECHNICAL REPORT DATA
                            . (I'leasr reail Instructions on the reverse before completing)
 I HI I'l ill I NO.
 LIV\  1)60/7-75-001-1
                               2.
    I LE AND SUBTITLE
 Compilation of State  Data for Eight Selected Toxic
 Substances
                                                             3. RECIPIENT'S ACCESSION>NO.
                                        5. REPORT DATE
                                         September. 1975
                                        6. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE
 7 AUTHOR(S)

 E.  Roberts, R, Spewak,  S.  Stryker, S.  Tracey
                                        8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NO.

                                            75-52 Volume  I
9. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS
                                                             10. PROGRAM ELEMENT NO.
  The  MITRE Corporation
  Westgate Research Park
  McLean,  Virginia  22101
                                                                2LA328
                                        11. CONTRACT/GRANT NO.
                                           68-01-2933
 12. SPONSORING AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS

  Office  of Toxic Substances
  U.S.  Environmental Protection Agency
  Washington, D.C.  20460
                                        13. TYPE OF REPORT AND PERIOD COVERED
                                           Final
                                        14. SPONSORING AGENCY CODE
 15f SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES
 16. ABSTRACT
        In  June 1974, the  Office of Toxic  Substances, EPA,  contracted with MITRE to
  collect  and analyze toxic substances datain the U.S.   In the next 14 months,
  MITRE  contacted agencies  in 20 key states and collected  and analyzed their monitoring
  data.  This report describes that effort and discusses  the amount, type and useful-
  ness of  the data and  the  toxic substances monitoring  capabilities of the state
  agencies contacted.
17.
                                 KEY WORDS AND DOCUMENT ANALYSIS
                   DESCRIPTORS
  Arsenic
  Beryllium
  Cadmium
  Chromium
  Cyanide
  Lead
Mercury
PCB's
Toxic Substances - Data
     Collection
                          b.IDENTIFIERS/OPEN ENDED TERMS
c.  COSATI Held/Group
|I8. LJIbTHISUTION STATEMENT

   Release Unlimited
                          19. SECURITY CLASS (ThisReport)
                            Unclassified
                                                      21. NO. OF PAGES
                                               20. SECURITY CLASS (Thispage)
                                                 Unclassified
EPA Form 2220-1 (9-73)

-------
EPA 560/7-75-001-1
   COMPILATION OF STATE DATA FOR
  EIGHT SELECTED TOXIC SUBSTANCES
                VOLUME I
              FINAL REPORT
                    BY
                 E. ROBERTS
                 R. SPEWAK
                 S. STRYKER
                 S. TRACEY
          EPA CONTRACT NO. 68-01-2933
        EPA PROJECT OFFICER. DORIS J. FINLAY

                    For
            Environmental Protection Agency
              Office of Toxic Substances
              4th and M Streets, S.W.
              Washington, D.C. 20460
               SEPTEMBER 1975
                     ,»*
                     H

-------
                        TABLE OF CONTENTS


                                                          Page

LIST OF TABLES                                              v

LIST OF FIGURES                                           yii

INTRODUCTION                                                1

SUMMARY                                                     7

CONCLUSIONS                                                11

RECOMMENDATIONS                                            21

SECTION 1:   OVERVIEW OF PROJECT RESULTS                    27

      Approach to the Project                              *9

      Overview of Monitoring Capabilities                  ^6

      Overview of State Toxic Substances Problems          ^°

SECTION 2:   DESCRIPTION OF STATE TOXIC SUBSTANCES
            MONITORING CAPABILITIES                        67

      Introduction                                         69

      Arsenic                                              72

      Beryllium                                            77

      Cadmium                                              81

      Chromium                                             86

      Cyanide                                              91

      Lead                                                 96

      Mercury                                             101

      PCB's                               ,                106

      Other Toxic Substances            '
                                iii

-------
                        TABLE OF CONTENTS
                            (continued)
SECTION 3:   TOXIC SUBSTANCES PROBLEMS AS
            PERCEIVED BY STATE AGENCIES                       111

      Introduction                                            113

      Arsenic                                                 114

      Beryllium                                               118

      Cadmium                                                 121

      Chromium            .                                    128

      Cyanide                                                 132

      Lead                                                     134

      Mercury                                                 145

      PCB's                                                   156

      Other Toxic Substances                                  161

-------
 1         Project Scope and Objectives                    5

 2         Key to Codes Used on State Monitoring          33
           Program Capabilities Descriptor Forms

 3         Overall Summary of Monitoring for  Toxic
           Substances in 20 States                       40

 4         Arsenic Monitoring Summary                    48

 5         Beryllium Monitoring Summary                   50

 6         Cadmium Monitoring Summary                    53

 7         Chromium Monitoring Summary                   55

 8         Cyanide Monitoring Summary                    55

 9         Lead Monitoring Summary                       57

10         Mercury Monitoring Summary                    52

11         PCB's Monitoring Summary                      55

12         Capability Descriptors for State Agencies     70

13         Summary of Monitoring Capability for
           Arsenic in 20 States                      .73

14         Summary of Monitoring Capability for
           Beryllium in 20 States                        78

15         Summary of Monitoring Capability for
           Cadmium in 20 States                          82

li         Summary of Monitoring Capability for
           Chromium in 20 States                         °7

17         Summary of Monitoring Capability for
           Cyanide in 20 States                          92

18         Summary of Monitoring Capability for
           Lead in 20 States                             97

19         Summary of Monitoring Capability for
           Mercury in 20 States                         102

-------
                          LIST OF TABLES
                           (continued)


Table Number                                                Page

    20         Summary of Monitoring Capability for
               PCB in 20 States                             107
                                 vi

-------
                         LIST OF FIGURES
Figure Number                                               Page

     • 1         States and EPA Regions Contacted
                During the Toxic Substances Project       .   32

      2         Total Toxic Substances Data Available        35

      3         Monitoring Program Capabilities
                Descriptor Form                              ^7
                               vii

-------
INTRODUCTION




     In line with its responsibility for assessing risks associated




with toxic substances occurring in more than one environmental media,




the Office of Toxic Substances (OTS), Environmental Protection Agency




(EPA), contracted with The MITRE Corporation to obtain available ambient




toxic substances data and information from state agencies.    MITRE




agreed to contact monitoring agencies in as many states as contract




resources allowed.  The objectives of this project were the following:




     •  Assess toxic substances monitoring capabilities of state




        agencies.




     •  Collect available state toxic substances data and assemble




        a data base.




     •  Summarize and analyze the data for basic statistics




        (minimum values, maximum values, annual means, standard




        deviations).




     •  Analyze the data in terms of its' availability, nature, and




        usefulness to EPA.




     In the course of this project, a variety of monitoring agencies




were contacted in 20 spates and available toxic substances data was




collected and analyzed.  This final report discusses the toxic sub-




stances monitoring capabilities of the agencies contacted, describes




the toxic substances data base that was acquired, presents the statistical




summaries and analyses of the available data, and analyzes the availability,




nature and usefulness of the state data to EPA.  Complete, detailed




                                 1

-------
accounts of the meetings with each agency and discussions of the

analysis performed on each portion of toxic substances data re-

ceived is contained in the four Quarterly Technical Summary Re-

      1234
ports, ' ' '  submitted to OTS during the course of the project.

     For the convenience of potential users, MITRE has divided this

final report into five volumes, as follows:

     •  Volume I:  Collection and Analysis of Toxic Substances

        Data from State Agencies - Final Report

     •  Volume II:  A Directory of State Toxic Substances

        Monitoring Agencies

     •  Volume III:  Data and Information Sources Used in the

        Course of the Study - An Annotated Bibliography

     •  Volume IV:  Compilation of the Summaries and Analyses of

        State Data

     •  Volume V:  Monitoring Program Capability Descriptor Tables

     Volume I is the overall discussion of the results of the project,

including the summary, conclusions, recommendations, and main text.

The main text of Volume I is comprised of three principal sections:

Overview of Project Results, Description of State Toxic Substances

Monitoring Capabilities, and Toxic Substances Problems as Perceived
 'Roberts, et al.  Quarterly Technical Summary Report M74-103 (The
2   MITRE Corporation, October 1974
 'Roberts, et al.      Second Quarter Technical Summary Report M75-3
    (The MITRE Corporation, January 1975)
 'Roberts, et al.      Third Quarter Technical Summary Report M75-27
    (The MITRE Corporation, April 1975)
 'Roberts, et al.      Fourth Quarter Technical Summary Report M75-57
    (The MITRE Corporation, August 1975)

-------
by State Agencies.  The first section is a review of the approach




and history of the project.  The second section describes agency




capabilities based on information MITRE obtained from each agency




on 25 key monitoring program descriptors.  Included here are such




items as size of networks, number of samples per year, major equip-




ment available, quality control procedures, amount and nature of




toxic substances data generated, and anticipated future capabilities.




The third section, Toxic Substances Problems as Perceived by State




Agencies, is an overall analysis of what was learned about each of




the toxic substances of interest from a review of MITRE's summary




and analysis of the available data and from discussions with agency




officials in each of the states.




     Volume II of the final report is the Directory of State Toxic




Substances Monitoring Agencies.  For all 20 states MITRE representatives




visited, information is provided on each agency which as been in-




volved in monitoring any of the toxic substances of interest.'  The




information includes official agency name, address, and name and




phone number of the key toxic substances point-of-contact in the agency.




     Volume III is Data and Information Sources Used in the Course




of the Study - An Annotated Bibliography.  This volume contains




references and a brief description of e?iCh piece of toxic substances




data and information collected from agencies in the 20 states visited.




Referenced materials include raw data sheets, computer printouts,




published articles, memos, annual reports, and other documentation.

-------
A cross-reference index is included so that the bibliography may be




entered either by state or by specific toxic substance,.  This




volume serves as the index to the toxic substances data bank turned




over .to OTS at the completion of the project.




     Volume IV is the Compilation of the Summaries and Analyses of




State Data.  This volume includes a discussion, summary, and analysis




of the state agency data collected and processed in the course of




the project.  The detailed information contained in this volume serves




as the statistical analysis data base for the discussion of toxic




substances problems contained in Volume I.




     Volume V contains the Monitoring Program Capability Descriptor




Tables.  This volume comprises 160 tables containing information on




toxic substances monitoring capabilities in 25 areas for each




monitoring agency and each toxic substance monitored.  T,Ue tables




serve two purposes for the final report.'  Individually, each table




provides an evaluation of each agency in a state for monitoring




each toxic substance of interest.  Taken as a whole, the 160 tables




are a data base useful for performing any number of cros.&-~tabulations




and analyses based on the 25 descriptors, geographical areas,




program areas, and toxic substances.  The discussion of agency




capabilities in Volume I is based on summaries and analyaes of the




capability descriptor tables.




     Throughout the following sections of the final report., it is




important to bear in mind the specific scope of the project.  MITRE

-------
is reporting on the toxic substances monitoring capabilities  and

toxic substances data of a variety of non-Federal agencies  in the

20 states contacted.  It was not the purpose of the project to make

a comprehensive assessment of the risks associated with toxic sub-

stances on a national scale based on all available knowledge.  Table 1

summarizes the scope and objectives of the project.

                              Table 1

                   PROJECT SCOPE AND OBJECTIVES
            INCLUDED
          NOT INCLUDED
•  Assess Monitoring Capabilities
   in 20 States

•  Assemble Data Base with Am-
   bient Data from 20 States

•  Summarize and Analyze Data
   Statistically

•  Assess Availability, Nature
   and Usefulness of Data to EPA
•  Assess Total National Moni-
   toring capabilities

•  Collect Emissions Data
•  Collect Data from All Poten-
   tial Data Sources.

•  Perform In-depth Analysis of
   All Data

•  Perform Comprehensive In-
   terpretation of Toxic
   Substances Data

-------
SUMMARY




     OTS contracted with the MITRE Corporation to collect and analyze




post-1970 data on a specified list of toxic substances under a 14-month




contract.  The list was comprised of the following substances:  arsenic,




beryllium, cadmium, chromium, cyanide, lead, mercury, polychlorinated




biphenyls (FCB's), aryl phosphates, benzene, 3,3' dichlorobenzidine,




ethylene glycol, hydrazirie, methyl chloroform, "MOCA" (4,4' methylene




bis 2 chloroanaline, a napthylamine, acrylonitrile.




     In the course of the project MITRE contacted toxic substances




monitoring agencies in 20 states.  As described in the Overview of




Project Results section of the main text, states where agencies were




to be contacted were selected by MITRE in consultation with OTS and




Regional Offices in order to achieve a representative mix of geographical




location, population density, and industrial versus rural economy.  By




contacting agencies within these states MITRE found that a wide variety




of agencies were involved with monitoring some of the toxic substances.




The types of agencies contacted included state departments of environ-




ment (all media), health, agriculture, fish and wildlife, natural




resources, public water supply, and sanitation.




     When MITRE determined that a number of agencies in a state moni-




tored some of the toxic substances of interest, meetings were scheduled




to discuss the agencies' programs and to make arrangements for
         Preceding page blank

-------
acquiring the available toxic substances data.  Copies of the agencies'

data were either obtained during the meetings or arrangements were

made to have the data compiled and mailed to MITRE.  When the data

was received, the MITRE project staff processed it to usable formats

and performed basic statistical summaries and analyses including

minimum values, maximum values, annual means, and standard deviations.

    After contacts had been made with 20 states and data was obtained

from agencies in the 20 states, MITRE began the process of preparing the

final report.  In order to fulfill the project objectives, this included

assessing the monitoring capabilities of the agencies contacted,

assembling the data base from the state data collected, compiling

the statistical summaries and analyses of the state data, and assess-

ing the availability, nature and usefulness of the data to EPA.

     To assess state monitoring capabilities, MITRE in the course of

the project asked each agency to provide information on 25 key

monitoring program descriptors.  This information was assembled on

tables for each state and each toxic substance monitored.  The'

160 tables (one for each of 20 states and each of eight toxic

substances^  have been published as Volume V to this final report.  The

tables were then cross-summarized and analyzed for the monitoring

capabilities discussion in the main text of this volume.  In addition,

Volume II was published as a directory of all agencies and officials

in the 20 states providing toxic substances data and information.
          \
     The toxic substances data base was assembled by state and

includes the agencies' raw data as received, MITRE1s tabulation of

-------
the data in more standardized formats, and computer printouts and




punched cards for the data which was computer-processed.   Volume III




was published as an annotated bibliography of the available state




data,.with a cross-reference to retrieve the data either  by state or




toxic substance.




     Statistical summaries and analyses were performed as data was




received in the course of' the project and has been published in




the four quarterly reports referenced in the introduction.  For the




final report the results of the summaries and analyses of state data




were compiled and published as Volume IV.




     Finally, the availability, nature and usefulness of  the state




data to EPA are discussed in the conclusions, recommendations, and




main text of this volume, with reference to the more detailed in-




formation in Volumes IV and V.

-------
CONCLUSIONS




     In the course of this project, personal contact was made with



officials of nearly 100 agencies in 20 states involved with monitoring




toxic substances.  Additionally, information provided by these




agencies on their monitoring capabilities was analyzed, and the actual




monitoring data they submitted was summarized and analyzed statistically




(see Volumes IV and V).  As a result of these activities, it is possible




to draw certain conclusions regarding the capabilities of the states



in toxic substances monitoring, and regarding the availability, nature



and usefulness to EPA of the data being generated.  This discussion




is presented in terms of overall conclusions, and specific conclusions




by toxic substance monitored and agency.





Overall Conclusions;  Agency Capabilities



    1.  In each of the 20 states visited, one or more agencies have



the present capability to monitor some of the toxic substances of



interest.  Whether or not a particular substance is actually



monitored appears to depend upon two main factors:



    a.  Availability of equipment (atomic absorption unit, mass



        spectrophotometer, or X-ray fluorescence unit for metals,




        and mass spectrophotometer or gas chromatograph for PCB's,



        other organics and exotic compounds).



    b.  A demonstrated need to monitor the substance (such as local




        contamination problems, or state or Federal regulations



        requiring monitoring).
        Preceding page blank

-------
     Where both of these criteria are satisfied, agencies do conduct




monitoring for toxic substances.




     2.  In the 20 states contacted, some monitoring was conducted for




one or more of the following substances:  arsenic, beryllium, cadmium,




chromium, cyanide, lead, mercury, and PCB's.  For the remaining nine




substances on the OTS list of toxic substances of interest, no agency




contacted conducted routine monitoring although several indicated they




had done occassional tests recently.  Those nine substances are aryl




phosphates, benzene, 3,3" dichlorobenzidine, ethylene glycol, hydrazine,




methyl chloroform, "Moca" (4,4* methylene bis 2 chloroanaline)




a napthylamine, and acrylonitrile.




     3.  With regard to future capabilities, over 85 percent of the




agencies contacted felt they had the equipment and trained personnel




to monitor additional toxic substances on the OTS list not presently




monitored if they were required to do so, and if a method of analysis




were available.  Virtually every agency believed, however, that an




additional analytical burden would require additional funds for staff




and equipment.




     4.  In all but a very few agencies, the method of analysis




employed for each toxic substance was referenced to a recognized




standard method.   In areas where EPA has recommended standard methods




and procedures, these were used by most agencies.  In other areas,




agencies referenced the standards as set forth by the American




Public Health Association, the Association of Official Analytical




Chemists, the Food and Drug Administration, and the U.S. Department




of Agriculture.  Based on the information provided by the agencies,
                                  12

-------
it may be concluded that standard methods of analysis are


employed, so that on that basis data from different agencies is


comparable.


     5.  Of  95 agencies contacted in the 20 states, only three had


no active quality control program.  All of the remainder had at


least internal programs, which included regular calibration and


maintenance schedules, standards for checking methods, equipment and


personnel, and the scheduled running of duplicate samples.  In


addition, the majority of the agencies participated in interlaboratory


testing with other state and local agencies and with the appropriate


Federal agencies (EPA, FDA, USDA, etc.).


     6.  Except for fish and wildlife agencies, most agencies operated


their own laboratory facilities, or had control of their own lab-


oratory section within a larger laboratory system.  The majority of


fish and wildlife agencies either relied on other state laboratories


or contracted with private laboratories for toxic substances analysis.


     7.  On the average, for all state laboratories involved with


toxic substances monitoring, there were 38 personnel per laboratory


of whom 16 were degreed chemists.  The ratio per laboratory is one

                                    i
degreed chemist for each 2.5 employees.  While there is no meaning-


ful method of judging the skills and qualifications of the chemists,


the numbers alone suggest a good capability for toxic substances


analysis.
                                 13

-------
     8.  When asked what type of assistance from EPA would be most help-




ful in their toxic substances activities, agency responses were split




fairly evenly into three categories.  These were a.)  standards promul-




gation including both safe limits of a substance in the environment,




and development of standard methods of analysis; b.)  funds for more




personnel and analytical equipment; and c.)  a wide range of other




agency-specific assistance (such as training, enforcement assistance,




etc.)  Other assistance specific agencies mentioned is shown in the




tables of Volume V.





Overall Conclusions;  Data Availability




     1.  While many agencies were sensitive to having additional




requirements put upon them for submitting data, in no case was there




refusal to cooperate with MITRE representatives in providing infor-




mation and data.  Including that data which had already been sub-




mitted to SARDAD, STORET, or directly to another Federal program,




data was available from 95 percent of the agencies which had some




toxic substances data.  In those cases where data was available but




filed in a manner which would require a large amount of the state




agencies' time and resources to retrieve and copy that data, it




was not acquired.  In all such cases, the agencies stated that




if OTS felt it were worth the time and expense, and provided




the necessary resources, they would cpoperate in making the data



available.  (Agencies with data which was not received during the pro-




ject are listed and the data discussed in*Volume III.)




     2.  In all cases where data was submitted, the agencies were




agreeable to providing updating data if required in the future.  The




                                  14

-------
only condition was that in many cases this would require some re-




imbursement for the costs of retrieval and copying.




     3.  Three state air quality agencies (lA percent of those




monitoring some of the toxic substances) submit their data to




SAROAD, and 14 of the water quality agencies contacted (58 percent)




submit their data to STORE!.  An additional six public water supply




agencies (38 percent of those with data) submit their data to STORET.



A large portion of the state air and water toxic substances data is



therefore currently available to OTS directly through EPA channels.






Overall Conclusions;  Nature and Usefulness of State Data to OTS



    1.  One of the most important observations about the state toxic



substances data is that virtually none of it was generated for the



purpose of including it in a national data system and using it for



detailed research and analysis.  As concluded in the discussion



of capabilities, states monitor a toxic substance for one of two



reasons:  either there has been a problem of contamination, or there



is a requirement to monitor because of Federal and/or state regulations.



In the former instance the monitoring is usually after-the-fact and




source-directed.  In the latter case, except where there may be a



real or suspected local problem, monitoring is for the most part in-



frequent.  As a general conclusion, state agencies, because of




inherent limitations on how much they can do, monitor toxic sub-




stances only when, where, and as long as there is a real or
                                15

-------
perceived threat to public health.  Consequently the state data is




of limited use for national trend analysis or establishing background




levels of various substances across the nation.




    2.  With a few notable exceptions, state agencies contacted have not




coordinated monitoring of toxic substances using the data from a




number of environmental media to achieve a more complete appreciation




of toxic substances problems.  Air agencies check levels of a




substance in the air, water agencies check it in water, agricultural




agencies check it in food, etc., but only rarely is the information




coordinated at the state level to assess total environmental threat




and to pinpoint sources most requiring control.  Two exceptions have




been the comprehensive environmental monitoring of lead in El Paso




and the similar coordinated study of arsenic in the Tacoma area.




Without reference to potential sources and to ambient levels in




other media, the state data is generally not very useful for




comprehensive toxic substances analysis.




    3.  While it may be concluded that state agency use of standard




analysis methods and laboratory quality control are strong points,




other factors lessen the usefulness of state data for comparisons




and aggregation for nationwide problem analysis.  Chief among these




factors are frequency of sampling, and number and location of sampling sites




and samples.  Frequency of sampling varied widely in all media for the




toxic substances of interest.  In air sampling, for example, one




agency collects sample filters daily, several collect them for






                                 16

-------
analysis every sixth day, while others analyze monthly and quarterly




composite samples.  In water the range is from daily samples to one




sample every two or three years.  Similarly, the number of sites or




samples ranges from several in some state agencies to several




hundred in others.  Before state toxic substances data can be of



much use to OTS for analysis on a national level, standardization




must go beyond laboratory methods and include frequency of sampling



and number and distribution of sampling sites.






Conelusions;  Arsenic



    As the discussion of substances in Section 3 of this report



indicates, arsenic is generally not regarded by the state agencies




contacted as a significant environmental problem.  The major exceptions



to this conclusion are in specific, localized areas where ore smelting



operations result in known arsenic emissions to the air and water, and




adverse health effects are suspected in the vicinity.  From the states



contacted, these locations were El Paso, Texas; Tacoraa, Washington; and



Kellogg, Idaho.  Additionally, there still remains some concern in agri-




cultural states that lead arsenate spraying in past years may result in



significant arsenic levels in foods.  Environmental contamination of



food with arsenic is found to be rare, however.






Conclusions;  Beryllium



    Beryllium was the least monitored of the toxic substances of



interest and is not generally regarded as an environmental problem by
                                 17

-------
the 20 states.  The only source-oriented monitoring was in Utah, where

beryl ore is mined; and in Pennsylvania, where much of the ore Is

processed.  Low ambient levels were reported in both states.
              >

Conclusions;  Cadmium

    Cadmium is regarded as a potential environmental problem in all

20 states contacted.  The toxic metal has been monitored in all

media; and known or suspected sources include smelting operations,

industrial/municipal effluents, leaching from ceramic utensils,

and plant uptake from naturally-occurring cadmium.


Conclusions;  Chromium

    Chromium is considered a potential environmental problem by all

states contacted, principally in waterways and drinking water supplies.

Where some high levels were detected in waterways and sediments, the

sources were believed to be industrial, especially plating industries.

Chromium in the air was generally below detectable levels.


Conclusions;  Cyanide

    Cyanide is not generally believed to be a major environmental

problem in the 20 states.  Although it is monitored occasionally by

most public water supply agencies, it remains the least monitored of

the toxic substances of interest except for beryllium.  Part of the

difficulty of determining how much of a problem cyanide presents is

that it is difficult to detect in chlorinated water,  (chlorine destroys

the cyanide  ion  in water.)

                                  18

-------
Conclusions;  Lead

    Lead shares with mercury the role of most monitored toxic sub-

stance in the most media.  It is considered an environmental problem

by agencies in all 20 states contacted.  Lead is monitored in air,

waterways, public water supplies, human blood, household paint and

dust, soil, ceramic utensils, fish, wildlife, and food products.

Despite the. widely known effects of lead poisoning, it remains a

major problem because the opportunities for exposure are so widespread

in the environment-


Conclusions;  Mercury

    Because of nationwide public concern over the effects of
                                        i
exposure to mercury in the late 1960's and early 1970's, most of

the agencies in all 20 states contacted have monitored the substance.

It is now regarded as less an environmental threat than initially

feared, but it is still monitored with regularity in areas where

high levels have been reported in the past.  Chief sources are

believed to be industries, especially the chlor-alkalai industry,

and residuals from fungicides with mercury compound constituents.

While sources of mercury contamination are now thought to be well

controlled, concentration of mercury in sediment and sludge from

past releases are seen as a lingering problem by state agencies.


Con cl us ions;  P CB' s


    Although all states contacted were aware of the potential hazards


                                  19

-------
of PCB contamination, PCB's were perceived as an environmental threat




only in- the states where they have been manufactured and/or where




specific incidents of contamination have occurred.  In the latter




states; such as Georgia, North Carolina, Michigan and Massachusetts;




PCB's are monitored fairly regularly in foods and water.  In the




remainder of the 20 states generally, the presence of PCB's is




occasionally detected at low levels in the process of screening




for chlorinated hydrocarbon pesticides.




Conclusion;  Other 'Substances




     While the other nine toxic substances of interest are recognized




by the states as potential problems, many are now seen as highly




localized and specialized problems and consequently are not routinely




monitored by the agencies contacted.  On the other hand, several agencies




have run limited tests in recent months on some of the exotic organics




of interest in water.  These agencies felt that the organic substances




may pose a greater hazard than the more commonly monitored metals,




and they felt research and development of analytical methods in




this area was needed from EPA.
                                 20

-------
RECOMMENDATIONS

     Based upon contact with nearly 100 toxic substances monitoring

agencies in 20 states and aquisition and analysis of most of their

available data, it has been possible to summarize and to draw

general conclusions as to the status of state agencies in monitoring

toxic substances problems.-  Now, based on a knowledge of state

agency capabilities and the availability, nature and usefulness of

their data, recommendations can be made regarding how OTS should .

proceed vis-a-vis the state agencies and what use can be made of the

accumulated data.  Before proceeding with recommendations, it may be

useful to summarize the conclusions regarding state capabilities and

data, by listing the comparative advantages and disadvantages of

state agency programs, as follows:

            Advantages;                       Disadvantages;

- In-depth  knowledge  of  local        - Monitoring  is  problem-response,
   problems                             not systematic

- Quick  response to immediate        - Little anticipation of  future
   problems                             problems

- Base of  trained  people and         - Little integration of
   equipment and networks               monitoring  among media  and
   available for integrated,            across jurisdictions now
   systematic monitoring
   i
     With  these characteristics of  state toxic substances monitoring

programs in mind,  the principal recommendations  follow.
                                  21

-------
      1.  Additional Data Acquisition.




      Because the data acquired from the 20 states is believed to be




representative of the non-Federal toxic substances data which is




available, and because most of the data itself is not particularly




useful for national trends or background analysis, it is recommended




that  additional historical data not be collected from the states at




this  time.  However, analysis of the data collected and the assess-




ment  of state agency capabilities also indicates that there is a




strong monitoring base available that is limited from more systematic




monitoring primarily by lack of resources for more personnel and




equipment.  While most past state data may not be particularly useful




for EPA's purposes,  any plans for future expansion of toxic sub-




stances monitoring should take into account the existing base of state




agencies which could be expanded to an effective, systematic




monitoring network if funding is provided.  It is therefore recommended




that OTS survey the remaining 30 states to determine capabilities




and availability of  toxic substances data so that information will




be available to EPA on which to base funding decisions for any future




expansion of monitoring efforts.




    2.  Acquisition of Information on Federal Monitoring Activity




    While the primary focus of this project was on acquisition of




data from state agencies, it was learned in the course of the state




meetings that a very considerable amount, of environmental toxic  sub-
                                 22

-------
stances data is being generated by Federal agencies such as USGS,  USDA,




FDA, Bureau of Sportfisherics and Wildlife, and others.   Additionally,




a number of other institutions are involved with toxic substances




monitoring under Federal grants.  It is recommended that OTS survey



Federal and Federally-supported organizations to determine the



nature and extent of their toxic substances monitoring capabilities,




the nature and extent of the data available, and the most appropriate




means of accessing the data.



    3.  Develop Information Clearinghouse Capability




     It is recommended that OTS serve as the clearinghouse for




promulgating information to state agencies on such matters as the



latest standard methods of analysis, new analytical equipment de-



velopments, problems encountered and lessons learned in specific



cases which may have wide application, and news of emerging toxic



substances problems which states should be aware of.  There is



presently no such central focus of toxic substances information,



and one clearly would be helpful to the state agencies.



     4.  Analyze  Specific Problems  in Depth




     Since  a broad,  systematic  approach to  analyzing toxic  sub-



 stance problems  across  the  nation  does not seem possible with



 the type of data that is available from the  states, it  is  recommended



 that  OTS concern itself more with  specific problems in  the states



 rather than searching for overall  trends.  For  each specific toxic



 substance,  the available data  can  show where significant levels have
                                  23

-------
been encountered for certain media.  Working with the Regional Offices and




state agencies, OTS should perform a comprehensive analysis in




those areas to determine sources, distribution of contamination,




transport mechanisms, population at risk, documented health effects,




control measures and eventual fate of the substance in the environ-




ment.  This will mean in virtually every case the data available




from the state agencies will have to be supplemented by additional




monitoring and research.  The end result will be a more complete




understanding of the nature of the toxic substance as an environ-




mental problem, with experience and knowledge that can be transferred




to other areas with similar problems.




    5.  Early Warning of New Toxic Substances as EnvironiflefofeAl Problems.




    Toxic substances are generally monitored by state agencies only




after their existence as an environmental problem has tfeen. well




established.  Furthermore, all state monitoring efforts are usually




targeted at existing, known problems with no resources available for




research into potential toxic substance problems.  It is



recommended that OTS fill this gap, through its own resources and




those of other EPA offices where appropriate, by developing screen-




ing methods which will identify those substances most likely to




become environmental problems in the future.  In this way state




agencies can have access to early warning on emerging toxic sub-




stances problems which their own resources could not provide.
                                  24

-------
    6.  Develop and Promulgate Standard Analysis Methods for
                                 V
        Emerging Toxic Substances

    Following logically from the above recommendation, methods will

have to be developed for.monitoring new substances In various media.

Even 1'f states had the resources to dedicate to methods development,

there would be little value in having each laboratory develop Its

own method for each new substance.  It is therefore recommended

that OTS, with its own resources and those of other EPA offices

where appropriate, develop standard methods and procedures for the

analysis of all new environmental toxic substances, and promulgate

these standards for use by all agencies in the states.  As standard

analysis methods are developed and promulgated, standards should be

promulgated for the size and distribution of sampling networks and

the frequency of sampling required to characterize a toxic substance

problem adequately.
                                  25

-------
                     SECTION 1
            OVERVIEW OF PROJECT RESULTS
Preceding page blank
27

-------
Approach to the Project

     In June of 1974 The MITRE Corporation contracted with OTS  to

collect and analyze post 1970 state monitoring data on specified

toxic substances of interest.  The final OTS list included the

following 17 toxic substances.

     arsenic                            benzene
     beryllium           .               3,3' dichlorobenzidine
     cadmium                            ethylene glycol
     chromium                           hydrazine
     cyanide                            methyl chloroform
     lead                               "Moco" (4,4' Methylene
     mercury                             2 Chloroanaline
     polychlorinated biphenyls (PCB)'s  a napthylamine
     aryl phosphates                    acrylonitrile

     OTS guidance regarding how much and what kind of toxic sub-
                         >
stances data and information MITRE should collect included the

following:

     •  Water data submitted to STORET and air data submitted to
        SAROAD is available to OTS through EPA channels, so agencies
        should not be asked to resubmit such data to MITRE.

     •  The priority and emphasis of data collection should be on
        state agency data.   Federal, university, and other data
        should be collected after the states have been contacted
        if contract resources allow.

     •  The data collection emphasis in the states should be on
        ambient data (i.e., levels of the substances detected in
        air, water, tissue, etc.).

      •  In addition to collecting and analyzing available data,  it
         is important that  information be obtained on the general
         monitoring capabilities  of the agencies and supporting
         laboratories.              .

      In the approach to the project,  the contract required a two-

 phased effort.   The first  phase  consisted of  planning and testing

                               29

         Preceding page blank

-------
out collection and analysis techniques in two states.   From that

experience, recommendations were made as to the best way to proceed

with the second phase, which involved applying data collection and

analysis procedures to as many of the remaining states as resources

allowed.  In summary, the data collection approach which was developed

involved the following steps:

      1.  First, MITRE contacted the OTS liaison representative in

          each EPA Region to obtain information on the state agencies

          where the Regional Office is located, and to arrange a

          meeting with Regional program area representatives to

          obtain information on monitoring programs of all states

          in the Region.

      2.  With information supplied by the OTS liason  representative,

                                                    123
          and information from available directories,  ' '  all agencies

          which might monitor toxic substances in the  states where the

          Regional Offices are located were contacted  by telephone.

          Meetings were scheduled with the officials of those agencies

          which indicated they had data, to follow the visit to the

          EPA Regional Offices.
 Directory of State Agencies Engaged in Environmental Monitoring,
 E.P.A. (Office of Research and Development),  December 1973.
2
 Governmental Air Pollution Agencies, Air Pollution Control
 Association, October 1973.

 Environment U.S.A.;  A Guide to Agencies, People,  and Resources,  R.R.
 Bowker Co., 1974.

                                 30

-------
      3.  MITRE representatives met at the Regional Offices with

          program representatives to obtain information on points-

          of-contact and monitoring activity in all the states of

          the Region.

      4.  Following the Regional Office meetings,  MITRE representatives

          met with the agencies in the states where the Regional

          Offices are located to acquire all available toxic sub-

          stances data and to evaluate laboratory capabilities.

      5.  When all- ten Regions and one state in each Region had b'een

          visited, MITRE reviewed the. information on state agency

          programs and selected a priority listing of the remaining

          states to be visited, using as criteria the following:

             amount of toxic substances data available
             seriousness of toxic substances problems
             east and west coast mix
             coastal and inland mix
             industrial and rural mix

      The point of balancing the states in this manner was to ensure

that a representative mix of states would be contacted if it were not

possible to visit all states.  Agencies in a total of 20 states

were contacted in the course of the project.  Figure 1 shows the

states visited.

      In formulating a general plan for processing, summarizing, and

analyzing the state data, a great deal of flexibility had to be

maintained.  The experience of Phase 1 showed that the state agencies

monitor many of the toxic substances in a wide variety of media at


                                  31

-------
        California
        Colorado
        Connecticut
        Delaware
        Florida
Georgia
Idaho
Iowa
Massachusetts
Michigan
Missouri
New Jersey
New York
North Carolina
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Tennessee
Texas
Utah
Washington
                                FIGURE 1
STATES AND EPA REGIONS CONTACTED DURING THE TOXIC SUBSTANCES PROJECT

-------
widely differing frequencies, and that rarely was anything resem-




bling a standard data format used except where the data was reported




to SAROAD or STORE!.  The data analysis plan which evolved called




for the following procedures:




      1.  MITRE processed the state air quality data into SAROAD-




          compatible format; and summarized and analyzed for range of




          observations, mean, and standard deviation by sampling




          station, by toxic substance, and by year.




      2.  Where appropriate, MITRE processed water quality and




          water supply data into a STORET-compatible format; and




          summarized and analyzed for range of observations, mean,




          and standard deviation by sampling station, by toxic




          substance, and by year.




      3.  For the remainder of the data, which included levels of




          toxic substances in hair, blood, fish and animal tissue,




          paint, food, feeds, plants, soil, dust, and sludge;




          MITRE processed the particular data to whatever reasonably




          standard format it was amenable to; and summarized and




          analyzed it as its unique characteristics allowed.




      The plans for data collection and analysis were carried out




through contacts with environmental, health, and other related




agencies in the 20 states.  The types of agencies providing data




included those with responsibility in the area of air pollution,




water pollution, solid waste, drinking water, fish and wildlife,
                                 33

-------
sanitation, agriculture, natural resources, geology, food and drug,




and public health.  So that useful summaries and analyses could be




made of the type and amount of toxic substances monitoring in the




states, the various agencies were aggregated into the media or




program area categories for air, water, solid waste, human health,




fish and wildlife, and agriculture.  In the four quarterly reports




which were submitted to OTS to review the progress on the project,




results of all contacts with the state agencies were summarized in




terms of those categories.  More complete details of data acquisition




meetings were contained in the main texts of the quarterly reports,




as were complete summaries and analyses of the data obtained according




to the data analysis plan.




      Clearly, with the focus of the project on state environmental




toxic substances data, a large amount of the total information




available on toxic substances from other sources was not collected




and analyzed for this project.  Figure 2 illustrates the fraction




of toxic substances data collected for this project and its relation-




ship to the total amount of information and data available.




      As described in the introduction, the objectives of assembling




a toxic substances data base and presenting results of data summaries




and analyses are addressed in Volume III and Volume TV respectively.




The two remaining objectives — describing toxic substances monitoring




capabilities and analyzing the availability, nature and usefulness




of the data to EPA — are addressed in this volume, with reference

-------
                     STATE
                     AGENCIES /
                           (20 STATES
                            .CONTACTED
FEDERAL SOURCES
                              QINT COMMISSIONS
(EPA,  USDA, USGS,
 FDA,  NOAA, DOI,
 CDC,  ETC.)
                          FEDERALLY
                            FUNDED
                              INSTITUTIONS
                FIGURE 2
TOTAL TOXIC SUBSTANCES DATA AVAILABLE
   (For illustration only-proportions estimated)
                   35

-------
to the information contained in Volumes II through V.




      Overview of Monitoring Capabilities




      In order to provide some quantitative measure of state toxic




substances monitoring capabilities, MITRE identified 25 key monitoring




program descriptors and asked each agency to provide information on




them.  Responses from each agency were recorded on a table, by state




and toxic substance, similar to that shown in Figure 3.  Table 2




is a key to the codes which were used in completing the forms.  When




these sheets were completed for all 20 states and all of the eight toxic




substances for which data was available (a total of 160 tables in




all), the matrices were summed and analyzed for each of the descriptors




by state,program,and type of agency.  Highlights of that analysis




are contained in this overview section, and a more complete description




of results by toxic substance is found in the section describing




state agency capabilities.




      Table 3 presents the overall summary of toxic substances




monitoring capabilities of the 95 agencies in 20 states contacted




in the course of this project.  The table was developed from analysis




of information recorded on the 160 monitoring program descriptor




tables, one for each state and for each substance, found in Volume




V of this final report.  This summary discussion is keyed to the




information contained in Table 3.




      1.  Total Sites.  The data received represented over 25,000




sites in the 20 states.  As the chart shows, the overwhelming
                                  36

-------
GJ
vj

STATE
TOXIC SUBSTANCE
MEDIA SAMPLES1
NO. OF SITES
SAMPLING FREQUENCY
EST. OBSERVATIONS PER VR.
INCLUSIVE DATES OF DATA
AMBIENT LEVELS2
MONITORING OBJECTIVE3
DATA STORAGE FORM4
DATA RECORDING LAG
ANALYSIS PERFORMED5
DATA RETENTION PERIOD
SAMPLE RETENTION PERIOD
DATA IN FED. SYSTEM
AVAILABILITY OF UPDATES
LAB USED6
NO. OF LAB PERSONNEL
NO. OF DEGREED CHEMISTS
FORMAL LAB TRAINING PROGRAM
MAJOR EQUIPMENT
METHOD OF ANALYSIS
QUALITY CONTROL PROCEDURES7
OTHER T.S. MON. CAPABILITY
FUTURE FOCUS OF MONITORING8
ASSISTANCE DESIRED FROM EPA9
OTHER COMMENT
MEDIA/PROGRAM AREA
AIR

1.

























2.

























3.

























4.

























WATER
AGENCY
1.

























2.

























3.

























4.

























5.

























SOLID WASTE

1.

























2.

























HUMAN HEALTH

1.

























2.

























FISH
AND WILDLIFE
AGRI-
CULTURE

1.

























2.

























1.

























OTHER

1.

























         NOTE:  Footnotes refer to the key to the codes,  Table  1.
                                                                                    FIGURE 3
                                                                          CAPABILITIES DESCRIPTOR FORM

-------
                             TABLE 2


KEY TO CODES USED ON STATE MONITORING PROGRAM CAPABILITIES DESCRIPTOR FORMS



  N. A.  =  Not Applicable

  N. 0.  =  Information not obtained

  1.        Media Sampled:

            A = Air, dust
            W = Surface and groundwater
            D = Drinking water
            F = Food and consumer products
            T = Animal tissue
            B = Human blood, etc.

  2.        Ambient Levels:

            Page number refers to
            page in Volume IV
            where statistics
            may be found

  3.        Monitoring Objective:

            C/E « Compliance/Enforcement
            RP  = Routine population oriented
            RB  = Routine background
            S   = Scientific research

  4.        Data Storage Form:

            C = Computerized
            S = Report sheets
            R = Periodic compiled report

  5.        Analysis Performed:

            0 - None
            C = Screened for compliance
            S = Basic statistics analysis
            D = Detailed study
                                 38

-------
                            TABLE 2 (continued)


KEY TO CODES USED ON STATE MONITORING PROGRAM CAPABILITIES DESCRIPTOR FORMS


 6.   '     Lab Use:

           A ° Controlled by agency
           S = Shared with other agency(ies)
           C - Contract lab
           U = University lab

 7.        Quality Control Procedures:

           I = Internal (standards, replicate)
           C = Check samples with other labs
          NP » No quality control program

 8.        Future Focus of Monitoring:

           IS = Increase substances monitored
           IN - Increase sampling network
                and/or number of samples
            S • Continue at about present level
           DS = Decrease substances samples
           DN = Decrease network size
                and/or number of samples

 9.        Assistance Desired from EPA:

           $ - Funds for more manpower    .
               and/or equipment

           S = Develop and promulgate standard
               analysis methods for all toxic
               substances

           T - Funded EPA training programs

           0 = Other
                                  39

-------
                         TABLE 3
OVERALL SUMMARY OF MONITORING FOR TOXIC SUBSTANCES IN 20 STATES
PROGRAM ARF.A
PROGRAM
DESCRIPTOR
1. TOTAL SITES
2 TOTAL OBSERVA-
' TIONS PER YEAR
3' PERCENT DATA
RECEIVED
, MONITORING
' OBJECTIVE
5. STORAGE FORM
6. USE OF DATA
7 DATA RETENTION
' TIME
8 SAMPLE RETENTION
' TIME
9. STORET/SAROAD
10. LAB TYPE
j^ AVU. NO. LAS
PERSONNEL/
CHEMISTS
12. TYPE TRAINING
13. LABS WITH
GC t. AA
1*. CAN DO ADDITIONAL
TOXIC SUBSTANCES
15 ANALYSIS METHOD
16 QUALITY CONTROL
1'. FUTURE MONITORING
FOCUS
18. HELP DESIRED
AIR
588
44,906
91
BACKGROUND
DATA SHEET
STATISTICS
10+yrs
10+yrs
4 of 22
OWN LAB
17/7
OJT +
12 of 22
16 of 22
EPA
INT. /EXT.
VAR.
STDS., S
WATER
SUPPLY
15,612
103, 114
81
POPULATION
DATA SHEET
STATISTICS
10+yrs
- 0 -
6 of 16
OWN LAB
18/11
OJT +
14 of 16
13 of 16
APHA
INT. /EXT.
VAR.
S, OTHER
WATER
QUALITY
9,272
254,762
92
COMPLIANCE
COMPUTER
STATISTICS
10+yrs
- 0 -
16 of 25
OWN LAB
17/11
OJT +
22 of 24
22 of 23 .
EPA
INT. /EXT.
VAR.
S
SOLID
WASTE
30
600
100
COMPLIANCE
COMPUTER
STATISTICS
5+yrs
- 0 -
N.A.
CONTRACTED
105/30
OJT +
2 of 2
2 of 2
EPA
INT. /EXT.
MORE T.S.
$

HUMAN
HEALTH
N.A.
12,840
89
POPULATION
DATA SHEET
STUDIES/
CHECKED
10+yrs
VAR.
N.A.
OWN LAB
78/36
OJT +
7 of 9
8 of 9
FDA
INT. /EXT.
VAR.
S, STDS.

FISH S
WILDLIFE
57
45,174
88
BACKGROUND
DATA SHEET
STATISTICS
10+yrs
- 0 -
N.A.
OWN
CONTRACT
26/19
OJT +
6 of 8
6 of 8
APHA
INT. '/EXT.
VAR.
$

AGRI-
CULTURE
N.A.
63,633
75
POPUIATION
DATA SHEET
CHECKED
10+yrs
- 0 -
N.A.
OWN LAP
28/15
OJT +
11 of 11
11 of 11
AOAC
INT. /EXT.
REMAINS SAME
STDS.
                          40

-------
preponderance of sites were in water monitoring.  No sites are




shown for the areas of human health and agriculture because in those




areas samples were taken of such materials as blood and food and




specific sampling stations were not usually involved.




     2.  Total Observations/Year.  Including all monitoring in all




media, there are 550,000 samples analyzed for toxic substances each




year by agencies in the 20 states contacted.  The chart shows the




breakdown of sampling by program areas.




     3'.  Percent Data Received.  This line shows agencies from whom




data was received as a percent of total number of agencies contacted.




The overall figure for all agencies was 95 percent.  For this summation,




data in SAROAD and STORET or otherwise submitted directly to Federal




agencies was considered data received.  As explained in Volume III for




each specific agency, the reasons data wasn't received from .some agencies




were either that the data was in the process of being compiled, or that




the data could not be readily compiled without a considerable effort on




the part of the agency.




     4.  Monitoring Objective.  Agencies were asked if their main moni-




toring objective was compliance/enforcement oriented, population oriented,




(i.e., checked for levels which may endanger human health), or background




oriented.  Many responses showed combined objectives, but the prevalent




overall response was population oriented.  No agency monitored purely




for research purposes.




     5.  Storage Form.  The entries here concern form of data records




and are either report sheets, compiled periodic reports, or comput-




erized storage.  As the chart shows, the common data storage form




is filed report sheets, except for water quality (where much of the




data is in the STORET system) and solid waste (where only two agencies





                                  41  •'

-------
 contacted have toxic substances data), which were mostly computerized.




     ^m  Use of Data.  This line describes what is done with the




 data once it is generated.  The entries were checking for




 compliance with standardsj basic statistics, and detailed studies.




 The most common use of the data was in basic statistical summaries,




 except the areas of human health and agriculture where the data was




 checked for compliance with standards only.




     7. .Data Retention Time.   The majority of agencies in all media




maintain historical records of their data for at least 10 years.




     8.  Sample Retention Time.  Because of the different nature of




 samples in different media, retention time varies from zero to at




 least  10 years.  In the majority of cases, portions of air sample




 filters are retained by air quality agencies at least 10 years.  Food,




 water, blood, and  other samples are generally not retained after




 analysis unless they show levels in excess of standards, and in those




 cases  samples are  retained where possible until appropriate action




 is taken and the case disposed of.




    9.  Data in STORET/SAROAD.  This line refers to the two major EPA




 data storage systems for water and air respectively.  As shown, three



 of 22  air agencies submit toxic substances data to SAROAD  (although




 this is not as yet a requirement), six of 16 water supply  agencies




 submit data to STORET, and 14 of the 24 water quality agencies




 submit data to STORET.
                                  42

-------
   10.  Lab. Type.  Laboratories used by the various state agencies
were either controlled by the agencies, shared facilities with other
agencies, outside contracted laboratories, university laboratories,
or various combinations.  For most of the program areas, the
majority of agencies used their own laboratories.  The two solid
waste agencies doing toxic substances analysis contracted with other
laboratories, and the fish and wildlife agencies were split between
those that had their own laboratories and those which contracted
for analysis.
    11.  Avg. No. Lab.  Personnel/Chemists.  This line shows the average
number of people working in the laboratories by program area and the
average number of those that are degreed chemists.  For some categories,
personnel with degrees in a related field and strong backgrounds in
chemistry were counted as degreed chemists.  The overall average for
all laboratories in the 20 states was 38. personnel, 16 of whom were
degreed chemists, for an average ratio of one chemist per 2.5 total
personnel.
    12.  Type Training.  For the majority of agencies in all areas,
the prevalent type of training was on-the-job-training  (OJT),
supplemented in a number of cases by occasional outside training
courses when resources allowed.  No full-scale, formal training
programs were reported.
    13.  Labs with GC and AA.  Possession of gas chromatograph
and atomic absorption equipment appears to be one indicator of
                                 43

-------
 the capability of agencies to monitor all the toxic substances of




 interest.  In virtually every agency, atomic absorption equipment




 was available, and in most areas except air and water supply, the




 majority of laboratories had both atomic absorption and gas chroma-




 tograpH equipment. .




     14.  Can Do Additional Toxic Substances.  Agencies were asked if




 they felt they had the equipment and personnel capabilities for monitor-



 ing additional toxic substances if there was a requirement to do so.  A




large majority of agencies responded that they could monitor most toxic sub-



stances on the OTS list if an acceptable method of analysis*were available.




     15.  Analysis Method.  All but five laboratories reported that they



employed the standard analytical method appropriate to the type of




analysis done.  These included standard methods recommended-by EPA,



 the American Public Health Association, the Association.of Official



 Analytical Chemists, the USDA, and FDA.  Where EPA has recommended




 a standard method, the majority of agencies reported that that is



 the method they use.  The other five agencies used manufacturers'




 recommendations for the type of analytical equipment usedy or they




 have developed their own methods.




    16.  Quality Control.  The prevalent type of quality control



 procedures in effect in the majority of agencies includes both



 internal checks with, standards and duplicate samples; and some out-




 side, interlaboratory checking of samples with Federal and: other



 laboratories.
                                  44

-------
    17.  Future Monitoring Focus.  There was a division in most areas



as to whether the future focus of monitoring would result in increasing




the network size and number of samples analyzed, increasing, the number



of substances monitored, .or remaining at about the same level.



     18'.  Help Desired.  When  asked what assistance from EPA would




be most helpful in  carrying out  their toxic substances programs,



the  majority of agencies  responded that the two most needed items



were:  development  and  promulgation  of standards  for acceptable



levels in  the environment and for methods of  analysis; and funding




support for laboratory  equipment and personnel.







     A  more detailed discussion of agency capabilities is found in



the  section Description of State Toxic Substances Monitoring




Capabilities.  The  format of  Table 3 will be  followed there in



describing state  toxic  substances monitoring  capabilities  with



regard to  each  toxic ..aubB.tance_moaltored.
                                  45

-------
Overview of State Toxic Substances Problems




     As is evident from the MITRE summaries and analyses of state




agency data presented in Volume IV, state toxic substances data




has been collected by a variety of agencies within states,, for a




number of reasons, in many media, at different sampling frequencies,




from a variable number of sites, for different lengths of time.




In general, where significant levels of a substance are determined,




the monitoring has been source-specific; and where more widespread




monitoring is done because of administrative requirements ..rather




than because of a problem, sampling is infrequent and values are




consistently low.  Consequently, a quantitative aggregation and




analysis of data from the 20 states contacted would not be very




meaningful.  However, based on the summaries and analyses of data




and on discussions with officials in the states, it is useful to




present a narrative discussion of the environmental problems asso-




ciated with each of the toxic substances of interest as perceived




by agencies in the 20 states.  A more detailed discussion of each




substance is presented in Section 3, Toxic Substance Problems as




Perceived by State Agencies.  The following is a summary of the




Section 3 discussion.

-------
     Arsenic




     Arsenic is a well known toxic element whose compounds have wide-




spread use in agriculture and industry.  All 20 states monitor water




supplies and none except Iowa report any substantial problem.  In the




case of Iowa raw surface water supplies were found to have exceeded




the 0.05 ppm US PHS limit, but, after treatment for the removal of



iron,  the level usually dropped well below that value.




     The most prominent case of arsenic pollution and hazard was




reported in Tacoma, Washington, where the largest production of the




metal in this hemisphere occurs.  Studies have been conducted by state




agencies and their, preliminary results linked stack emissions to




illnesses and high household levels of arsenic.  El Paso, Texas has




also reported high arsenic concentrations in Hi-Vol samples tested




to determine the levels of lead and other trace metals present.




    The agricultural food laboratories in ten states test



routinely for arsenic and five states include arsenic in their trace




metal air programs.




     Outside of the areas of specific source emissions, arsenic is




not viewed by the state agencies contacted as an environmental problem.




Table 4 shows a summary of arsenic monitoring among the 20 states.





    Beryllium




     Beryllium is the least monitored of the toxic substance under




review.  Its toxicity is recognized by state officials but they feel




its main threat to health occurs in the workplace.  A Beryllium
                                  47

-------
                     TABLE  A
             ARSENIC MONITORING SUMMARY

IEGION
i STATE
I CONN.
I MASS.
II N.J.
II N.Y.
Ill DEL.
Ill PA.
IV FLA.
IV GA.
IV N.C.
IV TENN.
V MICH.
VI TEX.
VII IOWA
VII MO.
VIII COLO.
VIII UTAH
IX CAL.
X IDAHO
X OREG.
X WASH.
MEDIA
AIR



•

•



•
•
•







0
WATER
•
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
SOLID
WASTE



0
















HUMAN
HEALTH











0


0
0



0
FISH &
GAME
















0



AGRICULTURE
0


0

8

0
0
0
0




0
0

0

Fairly routine monitoring, more than one-time survey.
                          48

-------
Registry Is maintained by the Massachusetts General Hospital and

discussions with the staff reveal that over 99 percent of more than

800 cases reported over the years were work-related incidents.

    None of the states has reported any current problem in any area

of the environment resulting from beryllium contamination.  It

Is mined in Utah (the only such operation in the US) and air mon-


itoring stations reportedly show low levels there.  Data from this
                                                       I
surveillance was not immediately, available to MITRE.  Pennsylvania,

which is a prime area of processing the ore, monitors air and water

for the metal but has not reported any significant levels.

Additional background monitoring in air occurs in Connecticut, New

York, Tennessee, and Michigan.  It is also monitored in water in

New York as a part of the heavy metals program in cooperation with

the USGS, but was not detected in significant concentrations.

     In spite of the wide industrial use of beryllium and. its

compounds, it was not considered by the state agencies contacted to be

a problem in the ambient environment in any media.  Table 5 shows the

monitoring of beryllium in the States.


    Cadmium


    Cadmium, widely recognized as a toxic substance with suspected

carcinogenic properties, has varied application in Industries

throughout the nation.  It was one of the substances most extensively

monitored by the 20 states.  All states monitor their water supplies

for cadmium content and 17 monitor their wastewater discharges.
                                 49

-------
                          TABLE  5
                BERYLLIUM MONITORING SUMMARY
REGION
& STATE
I CONN.
I MASS.
II N.J.
II N.Y.
Ill DEL.
Ill PA.
IV FLA.
IV GA.
IV N.C.
IV TENN.
V MICH
VI TEX.
VII IOWA
VII MO.
VIII COLO.
VIII UTAH
IX CAL.
X IDAHO
X OREG.
X WASH.
MEDIA
AIR
c


•

•



•
•




•




WATER



•
•
0
•













SOLID
WASTE




















HUMAN
HEALTH




















FISH &
GAME




















AGRICULTURE
0












'






= Fairly routine monitoring, more than one-time survey
                             50

-------
However, cadmium has not been reported by the states as a problem




in public water supplies.




     Cadmium was reported in California in high levels in areas which




were used for the cultivation of spinach and other crops.  It was




traced to naturally occuring deposits in phosphatic rocks which




had weathered and eroded into the Salinas Valley.  Spinach




and other leafy crops were found, to have an affinity for



cadmium which was concentrated in far greater levels than the sur-




rounding soil showed.  This discovery occurred during 1970 and forced




the temporary discontinuation of spinach farming in that area of the




state.




     Agency officials felt other sources of high cadmium levels were




from lead and arsenic smelters in El Paso, Texas; and Tacoma, Washington.




Hi-Vol samples from the vicinity of the smelter in El Paso showed high




concentrations of cadmium.  Lead, which was emitted in greater




concentrations than cadmium, was believed to be the source of. ill-




nesses in the area.   Large volumes of data have been collected by




the El Paso Health Department and most of it was obtained by MITRE.




Air, soil and dust have been analyzed and the analysis is included




in Volume IV.  In Tacoma, Washington, less data was available, but




indications from state health officials were that high levels of




cadmium were also emitted from the smelter.




     The other states monitored for cadmium as a part of their




programs to determine background levels for heavy metals.  There






                                  51

-------
were no reports of elevated levels in any medium other 'than seafood




and sediments.  Samples .from such areas showed the presence of the




metal resulting, according to state agencies, as a fallout from indus-




trial wastes.  These levels were not found in any substantial concentration.




     Outside of California and the environs of the smelters,  cadmium




was not reported by the states contacted as an environmenta1! problem.




Table 6 .illustrates a summary of cadmium monitoring in the states.




     Chromium




     All of the states contacted are concerned about the toxicity of




hexavalent chromium.  Many states monitor for both hexavalent and total




chromium, while some test only for total chromium.  Chromium-is monitored




in drinking water supplies in 15 of the 20 states, and other states mon-




.itor the chromium content of wastewater discharged to streams.  Chromium




has not been reported by the 20 states as a problem in water supplies.




However, some states have reported concern over probable discharge




of chromium waste to streams.  For example, Florida reported the




unconfirmed belief that chromium salts are used in air conditioning




systems as anticorrosive agents and are discharged to surface




waters.




     Five of  the 20 states monitor chromium in their air.network




routinely and  none have noted any problem area.   Five states  have




included the metal in fish surveys and two have been routinely checking




solid waste leachate for it.  Three states report that they check




for chromium in agricultural products regularly.







                                 52

-------
                         TABLE  6
                  CADMIUM MONITORING SUMMARY
REGION
& STATE
I CONN.
I MASS.
II N.J.
II N.Y.
Ill DEL.
Ill PA.
IV FLA.
IV GA.
IV N.C.
IV TENN.
V MICH.
VI TEX.
VII IOWA
VII MO.
VIII COLO.
VIII UTAH
IX CAL.
X IDAHO
X OREG.
X WASH.
MEDIA
•
AIR
•



•
•



•
•
•

•
•

•
•

•
WATER
* •
•
•
•
• •
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
0
•
•
' •
•
•
•
•
SOLID
WASTE



•
















HUMAN
HEALTH








. • .


•


•




•
FISH &
GAME
•
•
•











«

•



AGRICULTURE
•


•

• •

•
9





9

9



9 = Fairly routine monitoring, more than one-time survey
                               53

-------
     The emphasis in chromium monitoring, as can be seen from Table 7,




 is in water.  It continues to have a high priority in all 20 states




 and will undoubtedly remain on the list of heavy metals monitored.





      Cyanide




      The 20 states  contacted  did very  little monitoring  of  cyanide.




 Although it is well recognized as  a  lethal  substance,  state agencies  were




 aware of no health  hazard  from environmental sources.  The  low  level  of




-monitoring  activity might  also be  related to the  instability of the




 substance and hence the difficulty of  detecting it.   It  is  destroyed




 by  chlorine and  other oxidizing substances  and therefore its detection




 in  drinking water would be rendered  difficult, if not  impossible,




 since such  water usually carries a residue  of chlorine.   Nevertheless,




 ten of  the  states monitor  water supplies routinely for cyanide.




The only  other monitoring  occurs in  one state where solid waste




 leachate  is tested, and in two states where it is monitored  in




 agricultural products.  Table 8 shows  the monitoring of  cyanide




 amoung  the  20 states.




    Lead




    Lead is the most widely monitored of all the toxic substances




being considered.  All 20 states monitor it in water and all but four




monitor it in air routinely.  Those that do not have ongoing




programs have generally done preliminary investigations in the past,




and are planning to start regular programs.  In addition, several mon-




itor it in human blood,  in fish and game, and in agriculture.  Table 9






                                  54

-------
                            TABLE 7




                  CHROMIUM MONITORING SUMMARY
REGION
& STATE
I CONN.
I MASS.
II N.J.
II N.Y.
Ill DEL.
Ill PA.
IV FLA.
IV GA.
IV N.C.
IV TENN.
V MICH.
VI TEX.
VII IOWA
VII WD.
VIII COLO.
VIII UTAH
IX CAL.
X IDAHO
X OREG.
X WASH.
MEDIA
AIR
•



•




•

•

•






WATER
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
t
t
•
•
•
- •
•
•
•
•
•
. •
SOLID
WASTE
•


•
















HUMAN
HEALTH




















FISH &
GAME
•
•
•













•



AGRICULTURE
•


•











•
•



• = Fairly routine monitoring, more than one-time survey
                                 55

-------
                         TABLE 8




                CYANIDE MONITORING SUMMARY
REGION
& STATE
I CONN.
I MASS.
II N.J.
II N.Y.
Ill DEL.
Ill PA.
IV FLA.
IV GA.
IV N.C.
IV TENN.
V MICH.
VI TEX.
VII IOWA
VII MO.
VIII COLO.
VIII UTAH
IX CAL.
X IDAHO
X OREG.
X WASH.
MEDIA
AIR




















WATER



•


••
•
•
/
•



•
•
• '
•

•

SOLID
WASTE
•



















HUMAN
HEALTH




















FISH &
GAME




















AGRICULTURE
•














•
•



= Fairly routine monitoring program,  more than one-time sampling
                             56

-------
                            TABLE  9
                    LEAD MONITORING SUMMARY
REGION
& STATE
I CONN.
I MASS.
II N.J.
II N.Y.
Ill DEL.
Ill PA.
IV FLA.
IV GA.
IV N.C.
IV TENN.
V MICH.
VI TEX.
VII IOWA
VII MO.
VIII COLO.
VIII UTAH
IX CAL.
X IDAHO
X OREG.
X WASH.
MEDIA
AIR
•


•
•
•
•
•

•
•
•

•
•

' •
•
•
e
WATER
. •
•
•'
•
•
•
•
0
•
•
• '
• •
•
•
•
o
•
•
f
•
SOLID
WASTE



•
















HUMAN
HEALTH
•


•


•

e

•
•


•
•
i
\

« •
FISH &
GAME
•
•
•











•

•



AGRICULTURE
0


9

0

0
0
0





0
0

0

0 = Fairly routine monitoring, more than one-time sampling
                               57

-------
shows the extent of the monitoring activities among the states.

     The presence of lead in air is widespread throughout the nation

partly because of its use in gasoline, but more serious incidents of

airborne lead pollution concerned the emissions from the stacks of

metal smelters.  The most outstanding case was reported in El Paso,

Texas where city/county officials obtained a court injunction which

barred the smelting company from future emissions of dangerous levels

of toxic substances by 1977.  Epidemiological studies had correlated

illness of residents of immediate areas of the smelter with elevated levels

of lead in their system.  Similar concern over lead contamination was also

reported from Tacoma, Washington, and Kellogg, Idaho, where smelters

are also operated.  Studies were continuing in both locations and re-

ports should be available soon.  The Texas and Washington health agencies

have reported some degree of cooperation with operators of the smelters

in instituting controls on stacks to reduce levels of emissions of

particulate matter.

     Many states are engaged in studies with children to detect ele-

vated levels of lead in the blood so that treatment can be effected.

These programs arise from the problem of pica* in neighborhoods with

old housing which usually has leaded paint.   These programs are

usually sponsored by and coordinated with the Center for Disease

Control (CDC) in Atlanta, Georgia.
*The habit of young children ingesting strange objects such as
 dirt and paint chips.
                                  58

-------
     Lead is usually among the heavy metals monitored in water




supplies.  None of the states report any significant problems with



lead.in water supplies.  The data generally reveal very low levels or



values below levels of detection.




     .Many states have determined lead in pottery and other household




wares.  Such determinations are usually sporadic and are done on the




request of private individuals who might suspect lead contamination.




The vast majority of the tests performed in the states do not show



any lead, and the number of these kinds of samples have diminished




considerably from a peak in the early 1970's.  California officials



indicated that a bill was recently enacted to monitor the movement of




foreign pottery which is believed to be the major source of utensil lead.



     Because of the use of lead in the canning industries as a compo-




nent of solder, occasional contamination might be evidenced.  However,



none of the states reported any significant recent incidents, and dis-^




cussions with officials of the National Canners Association have indi-



cated that close, stringent quality control measures are observed to



prevent possible contamination.



     Although all 20 states seem to be wary of the toxic potential of



lead, only those with metal smelting and refining operations or problems




with lead-based paint in older dwellings have indicated significant



environmental health problems of lead poisoning.




     Mercury



     Mercury is well known to the environmental agencies in the 20
                                 59

-------
states contacted as a potentially hazardous substance.  Probably




because of the publicity which followed from the reported illnesses




and deaths in Japan in the late 1960's, all the states have monitored




mercury in at least one medium.  The predominant emphasis was on sur-




veys in water and fish and wildlife.  Most of these started in about




1969 and were discontinued after several years or were reduced in




scale to intermittent monitoring..




     Much historical data is available from most states, although only




a few states have compiled and analyzed their data.  One of the major




mercury surveys occurred in Massachusetts where there was substantial




pollution from industrial sources, and subsequent contamination of




fish.  In Georgia, Texas, and Idaho, mercury pollution was a major




problem in the fishing and hunting areas.  Fishing areas were closed




and residents were cautioned about excessive consumption of fish and




birds from some locations.  The results from the fish surveys generally




showed that larger and older fish had more mercury than smaller and




younger ones of the same species.  The predominant source of mercury in




Georgia was identified by state officials as a chlor-alkali plant, while




in Texas and Idaho the sources were believed by the agencies to be




industrial wastes and the drainage from natural deposits.  Pheasants in




Idaho, according to the state agency, became contaminated from eating




mercury-treated grains planted during the spring.  The use of mercury




was discontinued in the industrial processes implicated in Massachusetts,




while Georgia and Texas agencies reported that the concentration of







                                  60

-------
mercury in wastes has decreased substantially.  All of the remaining

states except Missouri and Utah also reported surveys over a three to

five-year period, but none revealed findings of similar magnitudes

as those mentioned above.

     At about the same time as the fish surveys, many states also

monitored water systems for mercury.  All 20 states did some testing

for mercury.  The levels reported in water quality data were at or below

limits of detection.  The only exception was in Massachusetts where

surface and ground water in the -Immediate area of specific waste disposal

and discharge was found to have very high levels of mercury.  This

water system was not identified as a source of potable water supply.

     The data available in the 20 states substantiate the statements

made by the states that mercury is not as widespread a problem as initially

believed, at least in their water supplies.  No state reported any

current case of contamination in any area where fishing or hunting

had to be restricted or prohibited, and most have expressed confidence

in the acceptable quality of their fish and game.  Furthermore, none of
                                         i
the 20 states identified any case of human mercury poisoning or

associated illness.  Table 10 illustrates the extent of mercury monitoring

among the 20 states.

     PCB's

     Because of the physical and chemical similarities of PCB's to DDT

and other chlorinated hydrocarbons, there is a strong awareness of po-

tential PCB problems among the environmental agencies in the 20 states


                                   61

-------
                             TABLE 10




                    MERCURY MONITORING SUMMARY
REGION
& STATE
I CONN,
I MASS,
II N.J.
II N.Y.
Ill DEL.
Ill PA.
IV FLA.
IV GA.
IV N.C.
IV TENN.
V MICH.
VI TEX.
VII IOWA
VII MO.
VIII COLO.
VIII UTAH
IX CAL.
X IDAHC
X OREG.
X WASH.
MEDIA
AIR










•
•








WATER
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
1
•
0
•
•
•
•
SOLID
WASTE
•
•

•
•

•













HUMAN
HEALTH
•
•








•




•
•
•


FISH &
GAME
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•

•

•
•
•
•
AGRICULTURE



•


•



•

•



•
•
•

• = Fairly routine monitoring, more than one-time surveys.
                                 62

-------
contacted.  Only Colorado and Missouri did not report any monitoring




activity for PCB's in any medium.




     According to agencies in Massachusetts and Georgia there was a




significant pollution of surface waters and the biota which inhabit




them.' In both states the sources of PCB's were believed by agency




officials to be from electrical component manufacturing operations which




contaminated the streams.  Iowa has reported a localized case of PCB




contamination of two species of rough fish.  Florida reported an earlier




incident in Escambia Bay which was probably the first known case of fish




contamination by PCB's in  the United States.  The Florida incident was




traced by the state agency to leakage from the PCB storage facilities at




the producer's plant.  California and New York have also done fish sur-




veys on a sporadic basis but did not report any significant findings.




Eight of the states — Connecticut, New York, Pennsylvania, North Carolina,




Tennessee, Michigan, Utah, and Oregon —routinely monitor agricultural




products for PCB's as a part of pesticide residue monitoring.  When PCB's




are detected in preliminary tests these states have the capability to




quantify the level of the substance present.   A major agricultural episode




of PCB contamination occurred in a number of  the southern states including




Georgia, North Carolina,  and Tennessee.   This incident involved the death




of a large number of chickens,  and resulted in an extensive survey that




found massive contamination in a wide range of agricultural products,




silage, and compost.



     States generally did not have consistent programs of routine






                                 63

-------
monitoring of water supplies for PCB's.   Several of the states have




checked surface water and groundwater at some time in the past and




those that have done fish surveys usually analyzed water samples.




Most of the water supply laboratories do not have the capability for




analyzing PCB's now, but most states have expressed the view that the




implementation of the Safe Drinking Water Act will result in an in-




crease in agency capability for its routine determination along with




other organic chemicals.





      While  all  the states  seem  to  be fully aware  of  the  potential  for




adverse  effects  from PCB's, only the pesticide  residue laboratories and




a few fish  and wildlife agencies have evolved any significant programs




to monitor  them.   This  will probably change  in  the near  future with the




increased interest  in organic chemicals and  the recently reported




findings  (at the time of writing this report) of  abnormally high




levels in commercial fish  in the state of New York.  Table 11 illustrates




the  extent  of PCB's monitoring  in  the states.




      Other  Toxic Substances




      There  were nine other  toxic substances  on  the list  of those of




interest to OTS.   These were:   aryl  phosphates; benzene; 3,3' dichloro-




benzidine;  ethylene glycol; hydrazine; methyl chloroform; "Moca"




(4,4* methylene bis 2 chloroanaline); a napthylamine; and acrylonitrile.




None of  these nine  substances were routinely monitored by any agencies



contacted in any of  the program areas, and no data was obtained.
                                   64

-------
                            TABLE 1 1
                     PCB's MONITORING SUMMARY
REGION
& STATE
I CONN.
I MASS.
II N.J.
II N.Y.
Ill DEL.
Ill PA.
IV FLA.
IV GA.
IV N.C.
IV TENN.
V MICH.
VI TEX.
VII IOWA
VII MO.
VIII COLO.
VIII UTAH.
IX CAL.
X IDAHO
X OREG.
X WASH.
MEDIA
AIR




















WATER

. •
•

•
•
•
• •
•
•
•
•




•


»
SOLID
WASTE




















HUMAN
HEALTH





•




• •
•

•

•

•


FISH &
GAME

•

•



•








' •



AGRICULTURE
•


•

•
•
•
•
•
•

•


•
•

*

• = Fairly routine monitoring, more than one-time surveys.
                                65

-------
However, the Connecticut Health Department Laboratory and the Iowa




Hygienic Laboratory had recently performed limited testing for benzene




and methyl chloroform in connection with occupational health programs;




and the. Florida Department of Pollution Control had recently been




involved with limited testing for organics in water.
                                 66

-------
            SECTION 2
    DESCRIPTION OF STATE TOXIC
SUBSTANCES MONITORING CAPABILITIES
                67

-------
INTRODUCTION




     One of the main objectives of this project is to report on the




capabilities of the various state agencies in the area of toxic substances




monitoring.  The discussion of agency capabilities should include




items such as size of monitoring network, analysis equipment




available, quality control procedures, amount and type of toxic




substances data generated,-and anticipated future capabilities, for



each agency and each toxic substance of interest.  In order to obtain




the information to describe agencies adequately MITRE defined a set




of 25 key program descriptors and each monitoring agency and/or




laboratory was asked in the course of the project to provide infor-




mation on each descriptor.  Responses from the agencies were recorded




on capabilities descriptor forms such as the one shown as Figure 3




in the proceeding overview section.  Table 12 lists the 25 descriptors




used on the form.




     Once a capability descriptor form had been completed for '




agencies in each of 20 states and for each of eight toxic substances




they monitor, a complete set of 160 forms was available.  These forms




provide a description of the toxic substances monitoring capabilities




of every agency contacted in 20 states which has monitored at least




one of the toxic substances of interest.  Rather than include all




160 basic forms in the body of this final report, the forms have




been published separately as Volume V of the complete report.
         Preceding page blank

-------
                TABLE 12
CAPABILITY DESCRIPTORS FOR STATE AGENCIES
          1.  MEDIA SAMPLED
          2.  NO. OF SITES
          3.  SAMPLING FREQUENCY
          4.  EST. OBSERVATIONS PER YR.
          5.  INCLUSIVE DATES OF DATA
          6.  AMBIENT LEVELS
          7. .  MONITORING OBJECTIVE
          8.  DATA STORAGE FORM
          9.  DATA RECORDING LAG
         10.  ANALYSIS PERFORMED
         11.  DATA RETENTION PERIOD
         12.  SAMPLE RETENTION PERIOD
         13.  DATA IN FED. SYSTEM
         14.  AVAILABILITY OF UPDATES
         15.  LAB USED
         16.  NO. OF LAB PERSONNEL
         17.  NO. OF DEGREED CHEMISTS
         18.  FORMAL LAB TRAINING PROGRAM
         19.  MAJOR EQUIPMENT
         20.  METHOD OF ANALYSIS
         21.  QUALITY CONTROL PROCEDURES
         22.  OTHER T.S. MON. CAPABILITY
         23.  FUTURE FOCUS OF MONITORING
         24.  ASSISTANCE DESIRED FROM EPA
         25.  OTHER COMMENTS
                    70

-------
     In addition to providing detailed information on the toxic
substances monitoring capabilities and the availability and nature
of the toxic substances data for each individual agency contacted,
the descriptor forms contained in Volume V serve as a basic data
base for any number of cross-summaries and analyses that OTS may
find useful to make.  For the overview section of this final report,
MITRE aggregated all states and all toxic substances monitored for
an analysis of overall monitoring capability in each program area
(i.e., air, water supply, water quality, solid waste, human health,
fish and wildlife, and agriculture).  Obviously, analysis is possible
on many other bases, such as geographically, for specific combinations
of substances, for specific types of programs, for agencies with
specific types of equipment, etc.  The ordering scheme MITRE used
in constructing the descriptor tables was the following:
     State
          Substance
               Media/Program Area
                    Specific Agencies.
After the primary ordering were the 25 capabilities descriptors,
describing the monitoring capabilities of the agencies.
With the tables available in Volume V, it is possible to order the
data by any of 24 possible combinations, and then to summarize and
analyze the data according to any combination of the 25 capability
descriptors desired.  For example,  if it were necessary to know the

                                 71

-------
amount of monitoring done for cadmium in surface water by fish and




wildlife agencies on the west coast whose data is not reported to




STORET, this could be found by checking the appropriate descriptor




tables in Volume V.




      In this section of the final report, agency capabilities have




been aggregated for all 20 states and the analysis is by each toxic




substance monitored in each program area.  A detailed summary table




has been constructed for each substance, and the accompanying




discussion is keyed to the capability descriptors shown on the




tables.   A far more detailed discussion of each specific agency




contacted in each state and the arrangements made for data acquisition




may be found in the four quarterly reports submitted to OTS during




the course of the project and referenced in the introduction to




this volume.  The discussion by substance follows.



Arsenic  (See Table 13)




    1.  Arsenic is monitored at a  total of 25,005 sites in  the 20




states in all media, which means that the substance  is monitored




at virtually all  the sites where toxic  substances are monitored.




Most  of  the sites are  in water, with 243  in  air  and  only



30 in solid waste (only  two  solid  waste agencies monitored  toxic




substances).




     2.   There are nearly 83,000 analyses  done  for arsenic -per  year




by agencies in  every program area.  The majority of  analyses are  done




by the water supply and water  quality agencies.







                                  72

-------
                      TABLE 13
SUMMARY OF MONITORING CAPABILITY FOR ARSENIC IN 20 STATES
PROGRAM AREA
PROGRAM
DESCRIPTOR
1. TOTAL SITES
TOTAL 08SERVA-
2- TIONS PER YEAR
3- PERCENT DATA
RECEIVED
MONITORING
4 • OBJECTIVE
5. STORAGE FORM
6. USE OF DATA
DATA RETENTION
7 • TIME
8. SAMPLE RET. TIME
9. STORET/SAROAD
10. LAB TYPE
u AVC. NO. LAB
PERSONNEL/
CHEMISTS
12. TYPE TRAINING
13. LABS WITH
GC & AA
14. CAN DO ADDITIONAL
TOXIC SUBSTANCES
15. ANALYSIS METHOD
16. QUALITY CONTROL
17 FUTURE MONITORING
FOCUS
18. HELP DESIRED
AIR
243
6,388
83
BACKGROUND
VAR.
STATISTICS
10+yrs
10+yrs
- 0 -
OWN LAB
34/8
OJT
3 of 6
4 of 6
EPA
INT. /EXT.
INCR. NET
STDS., VAR.'
WATER
SUPPLY
15,613
17,762
81
POPULATION
DATA SHEETS
STATISTICS
10+yrs
- 0 -
6 of 16
OWN LAB
17/10
OJT
14 of 15
13 of 16
EPA/APHA
INT. /EXT.
MORE T.S.
S, VAR.
WATER
QUALITY
9,119
39,654
94
COMPLIANCE
COMPUTER
STATISTICS
10+yrs
- 0 -
14 of 18
OWN LAB
17/11
OJT
16 of 17
16 of 17
EPA
INT. /EXT.
MORE T.S.
$
SOLID
WASTE
30
120
100
BACKGROUND
DATA SHEETS
STATISTICS
5 yrs
- 0 -
N.A.
CONTRACTED
170/25
OJT +
1 of 1
1 of 1
EPA
EPA Q.C.
MORE T.S.
$
HUMAN
HEALTH
N.A.
1,200
75
POPULATION
DATA SHEETS
STUDIES/
CHECKED
10+yrs
- 0 -
N.A.
OWN LAB
12/5
OJT
3 of 4
3 of 4
EPA
INT. /EXT.
DECR. NET
STDS., $
FISH &
WILDLIFE
N.A.
6,000
- 0 -
BACKGROUND
DATA SHEETS
STUDIES
CHECKED
10+yrs
- 0 -
N.A.
OWN LAB
5/3
OJT +
1 of 1
1 of 1
EPA
INT. /EXT.
MORE T.S.
$
AfiRI-
niLTl'RF
N.A.
11,873
80
POPULATION
DATA SHEETS
CHECKED
10+yrs
- 0 -
N.A.
OWN LAB
36/18
OJT
6 of 9
9 of 9
AOAC
INT. /EXT.
REMAIN SAME
STDS.
                         73

-------
     3.  For all the agencies contacted which had data on arsenic,




data has been received from 84 percent.  This included agencies




which submitted their data directly to SAROAD, STORET, or another




Federal program.  All agencies state that their data could be made




available to EPA on request in the future, although the majority




would require assistance for retrieval and copying.  The specific




reasons some data was not obtained are discussed in Volume III.




    4.  The prevalent reason for monitoring arsenic in the various




program areas was basically the same as the other toxic substances:




population-oriented for water supply,  human health, and agriculture;




background monitoring for air and fish and wildlife; and compliance




for solid waste and water quality.




    5.  From the air programs monitoring arsenic, data was received




in a variety of forms—data sheets, compiled reports, and computer




printouts.  Of the other program areas except for water quality,




where the majority of agencies had computerized data storage, the




prevalent storage form was on data sheets.




     6.  The predominant use made of arsenic data by air, water and




solid waste agencies was basic statistical analysis for their own file




information.  Agricultural agencies would generally only check the data




to see if levels were within tolerances.  In fish and wildlife and




human health areas, arsenic levels were checked for tolerances and




the data was used in detailed studies.




     7.  The only solid waste agency monitoring arsenic retained




data for the current five years.  All other agencies intended to






                                  74

-------
maintain historical data files for at least ten years, although


few had arsenic data going back that far.


    8.  Air agencies monitoring arsenic intended to retain portions


of Hi-Vol filter samples at least ten years.   Some specific human


health samples might be kept for varying lengths of time, but most


were discarded after analysis was completed or were consumed in the


analysis, as was true of all the other program areas.  The only


exceptions were where high levels were detected and the sample


was required for possible litigation.  In these cases, samples


would be retained until the cases were resolved.


    9.  None of the air agencies monitoring arsenic have submitted


the data to SAROAD except Texas, and since no code was available


for Texas' X-ray fluorescence method, that data has not yet been


entered into SAROAD.  Three water supply agencies and 14 water


quality agencies submit arsenic data to STORET.


     10.  All agencies except the one solid waste agency  analyze for


arsenic in the agencies' own laboratories.  In the agency for solid


waste, analysis was done under contract.
                                        f

     11.  In all the laboratories which analyzed for arsenic,


there were an average of 42 laboratory personnel, of whom an average


of 11 were degreed chemists.  The breakdown of average laboratory


personnel and degreed chemists for each program area is shown in


Table 13..
                                 75

-------
     12.  In laboratories where arsenic analysis is performed, the




most common form of training is on-the-job-training, supplemented by




outside training courses when schedules and resources allow.  None of




the laboratories reported having formal training programs.




     13.  In all program areas except air, 83 percent of agencies




had use of atomic absorption and gas chromatograph equipment.  Three




of six air agencies had both units.




     14.  Eighty-five percent of air and water agencies, and all of the




solid waste, human health, fish and wildlife, and agriculture agencies




which monitored arsenic, felt they had the capability in terms of




trained personnel and equipment to monitor almost any toxic substance



that might be required from the OTS list.  The only conditions were




that a method of analysis be available and that the additional analysis




could fit into their work load.




     15.  The prevalent analysis method for arsenic across the board




except for agriculture was that recommended or endorsed by EPA.  For




agricultural agencies the most commonly referenced method was that




recommended by  the Association of Official Analytical Chemists.




     16.  Thirty-three of 52 agencies and laboratories reported that



they employed both internal and external  procedures for quality




control.  Specific procedures varied from laboratory to laboratory,




but generally they included standards and duplicate samples in the




laboratory and  occasional check samples with outside laboratories.
                                  76

-------
     17.  The expected future focus of toxic substances monitoring




varied from program to program.   Air programs monitoring arsenic




expected for the most part to increase network size and number of




samples.  In water 17 of 38 agencies felt that new regulations would




require' monitoring more substances than arsenic and the others they




are currently doing.  More metals and organics on the OTS list were




also expected to be monitored in the areas of solid waste and fish




and wildlife.  Human health agencies expected less widespread analysis




or random analysis for arsenic and more detailed study in specific areas




of concern.  One-half of the agricultural agencies expected the sample




work load to remain about the same for the near future.




      18.   Responses to  the question of what  assistance from  EPA




would be most desirable varied  within and among program areas.




The most common assistance desired was research  and  development  of




standards  for substances, development of methods of  analysis for new




toxic substances,  and funds  for additional  personnel and equipment.




Beryllium  (See  Table 14)




      1.  Beryllium was monitored at a  total of 7,039 sites in the





20 states—the  least number  of  sites of  any of the substances for




which data was  available.  All  but  235 of  these  sites  were water




quality and water supply  sites  in two  states.




      2.  The total of all analyses  for beryllium per year was 16,526,




also  the lowest number for all  substances.
                                   77

-------
                       TABLE 14
SUMMARY OF MONITORING CAPABILITY FOR BERYLLIUM IN 20 STATES
PROGRAM AREA
PROGRAM
DESCRIPTOR
1 . TOTAL SITES
2. TOTAL OBSERVA-
TIONS PER VEAR
3, PERCENT DATA
RECEIVED
4 MONITORING
OBJECTIVE
5. STORAGE FORM
6. USE OF DATA
7 DATA RETENTION
TIME
8 SAMPLE RETENTION
TIME
9. STORET/SAROAD
10. LAB TYPE
H. /\VG. NO. LAB
PERSONNEL/
CHEMISTS
12. TYPE TRAINING
13. LABS WITH
GC & AA
U CAN DO ADDITIONAL
TOXIC SUBSTANCES
15_ ANALYSIS METHOD
16. QUALITY CONTROL
17. FUTURE MONITORING
FOCUS
18. HELP DESIRED
AIR
235
3,526
100
BACKGROUND
COMPUTER
STATISTICS
lOfyrs
104-yrs
1 of 8
OWN LAB
32/11
OJT
5 of 8
6 of 8
EPA
INT. /EXT.
INCR. NET
S, VAR.
WATER
SUPPLY
1,023
1,500
100
POPULATION
COMPUTER
STATISTICS
10+yrs
- 0 -
2 of 3
OWN LAB
20/12
OJT
2 of 2
1 of 2
EPA
INT. /EXT.
MORE T.S.
S
WATER
QUALITY
5,78]
5,500
100
VAR.
COMPUTER
STATISTICS
ICH-yrs
- 0 -
2 of 2
OWN LAB
17/10
OJT
1 of 1
1 of 1
EPA
INT. /EXT.
REMAIN SAME
STDS.
SOLID
WASTE
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
HUMAN
HEALTH
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-'
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
FISH S
WILDLIFE
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ACR1-
CUI.TURE
N.A.
6,0(10
- 0 -
COMPLIANCE
DATA SHEETS
STATISTICS
10+yrs
- 0 -
-
OWN LAB
18/9
OJT
1 of 1
1 of 1
USDA
INT. /EXT.
REMAIN SAME
STDS.
                       78

-------
     3.  Including data in STORET, data was counted as received from

all agencies which monitored beryllium except for the Connecticut

Agricultural Station.  That agency randomly samples food but compiles

no data.

     4.  Objectives of monitoring for beryllium varied.  In air it

was primarily to determine background levels, in water supply it was

population oriented, and for the water quality and agricultural

agencies it was population and compliance oriented.

     5.  The predominant data storage form for 54 percent of air

and water agencies was a computer system, and for the agricultural

agency data sheets were .used.
                                                      •
     6.  In all areas the most common use of the data was to determine

basic statistics for the agencies own information.  Air agencies re-

ported that routine checking was also done to see if levels were

excessive.

     7.  In nearly all cases it was the intention of the agencies

to maintain data records at least'ten years.

     8.  Air sample filters for beryllium-were kept for at least ten

years.  In water and agriculture, samples were generally not retained

beyond analysis except where required for possible litigation.  In

these cases, samples were kept until enforcement litigation was re-

solved.

     9.  Of eight air agencies monitoring beryllium," only Utah submits

the data to SAROAD.  Both of the water supply and water quality agencies

submit beryllium data to STORET.


    10.  All of the agencies monitoring beryllium have control of

their own laboratory, or of their own section within a larger
                                  79

-------
laboratory system.




    11.  For all laboratories monitoring beryllium,  the average




personn-el strength is 22,  10 of whom are degreed chemists.    Table 14




shows the breakdown for each program area.




    12.'  For all program areas, the prevailing form of training is




on-the-job-training.  Some agencies reported that this is occasionally




supplemented by outside training courses when schedules and resources




permit.




    13.  Except for air, all agencies had access to  atomic absorption




and gas chromatograph equipment.  All air agencies had atomic




absorption units, which are required for trace metal analysis, and




five of the eight monitoring beryllium did have gas chromatographs




as well.




    14.  The majority of agencies in the programs where beryllium




was monitored felt they could monitor most additional toxic sub-




stances if required, and all agencies felt they could do at least




some additional ones.  The only conditions were that a method of




analysis be available for the substance, and time and personnel be




available to do the analysis along with all other requirements.




    15.  Except for the agricultural agency, which reported using




a USDA analysis method, all the agencies monitoring beryllium use




the analysis method endorsed or recommended by EPA.




    16.  The most common quality control procedures  reported were
                                  80

-------
both internal (calibration, standards, duplicates)  and external (check




samples with outside laboratories).   Two air agencies (Utah and Wayne




County, Michigan) reported that no formal quality control programs




were being practiced.




     17.-  The agricultural and water quality agencies expected their




toxic substances monitoring to remain at about the same level in the




near future.  About 44 percent of air and 67 percent of water supply




agencies anticipated increased networks and sampling and an increase




in the number of substances sampled.





     18.   The assistance most  desired from EPA varied among the




 agencies  monitoring beryllium,  but  two items  were  prevalent.   One




 was  standards,  both of acceptable levels of substances  in the en-




 vironment,  and  standard 'methods of analysis  for new substances.   The




 other commonly  mentioned item was funding for more personnel  and




 equipment.




 Cadmium (See Table 15)




      1.  For the 20 states contacted, cadmium is monitored at an




 overall total of 25,380 sites.  It  is monitored at all the solid




 waste, water supply, and water quality sites where any toxic




 substances are  monitored, and it is monitored at the majority of




 the air and fish and wildlife sites where metals are analyzed.





      2.   For all media, there are about 93,000 analyses done for




 cadmium per year by all agencies reporting.  The predominant media




 is water, with  a significant  amount of sampling and analysis  also
                                   51

-------
                       TABLE 15
SUMMARY OF MONITORING CAPABILITY FOR CADMIUM IN 20 STATES
PROGRAM AREA
PROGRAM
DESCRIPTOR
1. TOTAL SITES
, TOTAL OBSERVA-
' TIONS PER YEAR
1. PERCENT DATA
RECEIVED
, MONITORING
' OBJECTIVE
5. STORAGE FORM
6. USE OF DATA
7 DATA RETENTION
TIME
8 SAMPLE RETENTION
' TIME
9. STORET/SAROAD
10. LAB TYPE
,, AVU. NO. LAB
' PERSONNEL/
CHEMISTS
12. TYPE TRAINING
13. LABS WITH
GC & AA
14. CAN DO ADDITIONAL
TOXIC SUBSTANCES
15. ANALYSIS METHOD
16. QUALITY CONTROL
17. FUTURE MONITORIHG
FOCUS
18. HELP DESIRED
AIR
427
11,824
100
BACKGROUND
REPORT FORM
STATISTICS
10+yrs
10+yrs
1 of 16
OWN IAB
10/6
OJT +
8 of 16
12 of 15
EPA
INT. /EXT.
VAR.
MORE T.S.
STD, S
WATER
SUPPLY
15,612
20,262
70
POPULATION
REPORT FORM
STATISTICS
10+yrs
- 0 -
6 of 17
OWN LAB
18/10
OJT
14 of 16
13 of 16
EPA
INT. /EXT.
VAR.
MORE T.S.
S, VAR.
WATER
QUALITY
9,272
43,846
96
COMPLIANCE
COMPUTER
STATISTICS
10+yrs
- 0 -
16 of 25
OWN LAB
17/11
OJT
21 of 23
22 of 23
EPA
INT. /EXT.
VAR.
MORE T.S.
S
SOLID
WASTE
30
120
100
COMPLIANCE
COMPUTER
CHECKED
5+yrs
- 0 -
N.A.
CONTRACTED
170/25
OJT +
1 of 1
1 of 1
EPA
INT. /EXT.
MORE T.S.
S
HUMAN
HEALTH
N.A.
780
100
POPULATION
COMPUTER
CHECKED
10+yrs
-.0 -
N.A.
OWN LAB
16/7
OJT
2 of 3
2 of 3
FDA/AOAC
INT. /EXT.
DECREASE
STDS., VAR.
FISH 6
WILDLIFE
39
9,330
80
BACKGROUND
REPORT FORM
STATISTICS
10+yrs
- 0 -
N.A.
VAR.
24/19
OJT +
4 of 5
4 of 5
VAR.
INT. /EXT.
VAR.
S
AGRI-
CULTURE
N.A.
6,705
60
COMPLIANCE
REPORT FORM
CHECKED
var.
- 0 -
N.A.
OWN LAB
37/24
OJT
4 of 4
4 of 4
FDA/AOAC
INT. /EXT.
REMAIN SAME
STDS.
                          82

-------
 done in the air and fish and wildlife areas.




      3.  The overall percentage of data acquisition from all




 agencies with some cadmium data was 86 percent.  This includes those




 agencies sending data directly to SARDAD, STORET,  or another Federal




 program.  All agencies contacted felt that they would be able to send




 future updates if required, although some assistance may be needed




 for retrieving and copying data.




      A.  The objective of monitoring for cadmium varied within and




 among program areas.   Eleven of.22 air agencies monitored to determine




 what background levels were, and at other air agencies the objective




 was population and compliance oriented.   Sixty-eight percent of water




 quality, solid waste, and agricultural monitoring was compliance



 oriented.   The water supply, fish and wildlife, and human health




monitoring was primarily population oriented.




      5.  The predominant form of data storage for water quality,




 solid waste, human health, and 50 percent of water supply agencies,



 was computerization.   For the other agencies, data was maintained




 on some form of data sheets.




      6.  The cadmium data was used in some sort of statistical




 analysis by the majority of agencies in the air, water, and fish




 and wildlife areas.  In solid waste, human health, and agriculture,




 individual levels were checked mainly to determine if they were



 excessive.






                                  83

-------
     7.  Most agencies intended to retain cadmium data a minimum of




ten years.  Solid waste agencies expected to  retain data at least




five years, and the retention period among agricultural agencies




ranged from one year to more than ten years.




     8.  Nine of 16 air agencies retained portions of  filter




samples for at least ten years.  In all other areas, samples were




not retained beyond analysis unless levels were significantly high.




In these cases, samples were usually retained until enforcement



litigation was resolved.




     9.  One of the 16 agencies reporting cadmium data submits the




data to SAROAD.  Six of 17 water supply agencies and 16 of 25




water quality agencies submit their data to STOKET.




    10.  Except in the areas of fish and wildlife and solid waste,




the majority of agencies perform cadmium analysis in their own




laboratory.  The solid waste analysis is done by contract




laboratories, and the six fish and wildlife agencies monitoring




cadmium are split among contract laboratories, shared facilities,




and their own laboratories.




    11.  Overall, for all laboratories performing analyses for




cadmium, there are an average of 42 personnel in the laboratory, of




whom 15 are degreed chemists.  The average proportions for laboratories




in the various program areas are shown in Table 15.





12.  For most laboratories, the primary training of personnel







                                  84

-------
is on-the-job training, with occasional outside courses when schedules




and resources allow.  No laboratory reported having a formal training




program.        ;




    13.  Almost 80 percent of agencies contacted had access to both



atomic absorption and gas chromatograph equipment.  All air agencies




had access to at least atomic absorption units, which are required in




their trace metal analysis*




    14.  Based on the trained personnel and equipment available, 88




percent of the agencies monitoring cadmium felt they had the capability




to monitor most other toxic substances on the OTS list if required.  Every




agency felt it could do at least some additional substances.  The only




conditions were that a method of analysis be available and that




resources be provided for more personnel and equipment if new




analytical burdens interfered with existing work loads.




    15.  In the air, water, and solid waste areas, the method of




analysis for cadmium most frequently referenced was the atomic




absorption method recommended or endorsed by EPA.  In human health




and agriculture, it was the FDA and Association of Official Analytical




Chemists standard method, and for fish and wildlife agencies a variety




of standard methods were reportedly used, the most common being that




recommended by EPA.




    16.  Except for three air agencies which reported no programs




and several water and agricultural agencies which had only internal
                                  85

-------
programs, 49 percent of the agencies in all areas have both internal




and external quality control programs.   Internal procedures included cal-




ibrations, standards, and duplicate samples; and external procedures usually




included  exchanging check samples with Federal or other laboratories.




    17:  Views of the future focus of monitoring varied considerably




within and among program areas.  Eighteen of 19 air agencies expected




to see more substances monitored and an increase in network size and




number of samples, as was also true of  33 of 44 water supply and




water quality agencies.  Solid waste anticipated that more toxic




substances would be monitored, agriculture expected about the same




level of  effort, human health looked for a decrease in random sampling




with a concentration on problem areas,  and fish and wildlife was




divided among agencies which expected to expand sampling, decrease




sampling, and remain at about the same level.




    18.  As was the case for the aggregate of all agencies monitoring




all substances, of all the areas of assistance from EPA which would




be most useful to agencies monitoring cadmium, two were primary.




These were standards for levels of toxic substances in the environ-




ment and  standard methods for their measurement, and funds for




additional equipment and personnel.  There were also a variety of




individual items mentioned by specific  agencies.  (See Volume V tor




other items mentioned).




Chromium  (See Table 15)




     1.  Chromium is monitored at nearly 25,000 sites in the 20




states contacted.  It is monitored at all solid waste sites where





                                  86

-------
                       TABLE 16
SUMMARY OF MONITORING CAPABILITY FOR CHROMIUM IN 20 STATES
PROGRAM AREA
PROGRAM
DESCRIPTOR
1. TOTAL SITES
2. TOTAL OBSERVA-
TIONS PER YEAR
3. PERCENT DATA
RECEIVED
4 . MONITORING
OBJECTIVE
5. STORAGE FORM
6. USE OF DATA
7. DATA RETENTION
TIME
8. SAMPLE RETENTION
TEIE
9. STORET/SAROAD
10. LAB TYPE
11. AVG. NO. LAB
PERSONNEL/
CHEMISTS
12. TYPE TRAINING
13. LABS WITH
GC 6 AA
14. CAN DO ADDITIONAL
TOXIC SUBSTANCES
15. ANALYSIS METHOD
16. QUALITY CONTROL
17 ' FUTURE MONITORING
FOCUS
IB. HELP DESIRED
AIR
223
4,488
100
BACKGROUND
COMPUTER
STATISTICS
lOfyrs
10+yro
- 0 -
OWN LAB
13/11
OJT +
2 of 5
3 of 5
EPA
INT. /EXT.
VAR.
VAR.
WATER
SUPPLY
15,122
20,012
69
POPULATION
DATA SHEETS
STATISTICS
lOt-yrs
- 0 -
5 of 16
OWN LAB
17/10
OJT
13 of 16
13 of 16
APHA/EPA
INT. /EXT.
VAR.
5, VAR.
WATER
QUALITY
9,255
43,562
91
COMPLIANCE
COMPUTER
STATISTICS
10+yrs
- 0 -
15 of 21
OWN LAB
18/11
OJT
20 of 23
20 of 23
EPA
INT. /EXT.
VAR.
$
SOLID
WASTE
30
120
100
COMPLIANCE
COMPUTER
STATISTICS
5+yrs
- 0 -
-
CONTRACTED
105/.30
OJT +
2 of 2
2 of 2
EPA
INT. /EXT.
MORE T.S.
$
HUMAN
HEALTH
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
FISH &
WILDLIFE
39
6,335
100
BACKGROUND
DATA SHEETS
STATISTICS
10+yrs
- 0 -
-
VAR.
24/20
OJT +
4 of 4
4 of 4
EPA
INT. /EXT.
VAR.
$
AGRI-
CULTURE
-
6,600
33
COMPLIANCE
DATA SHEETS
STATISTICS
104-yrs
- 0 -
-
OWN LAB
27/18
OJT
2 of 3
2 of 3
USDA/AOAC
INT. /EXT.
REMAIN SAME
STDS.
                         87

-------
toxic substances are monitored, at nearly all the water supply and




water quality sites, and the majority of fish and wildlife sites, and




at about half of the air sites.




     2.  Over 81,000 analyses are made for chromium per year by




agencies in all the program areas combined.  Water sample analysis




accounts for about 63,500 of this total.




     3.  For all agencies which conducted chromium analysis, data




was considered received from 83 percent.  This includes agencies




which submitted their chromium data directly to SAROAD, STORE!, or




another Federal program.  For specific reasons some data was not




collected, see Volume III.




     4.  Similar to the situation for other toxic metals, the monitor-




ing objectives varied within and among program areas.  The primary




objective for air and fish and wildlife programs was background




level determination.   In water supply, the objective was primarily




population oriented, while for water quality, solid waste, and




agriculture,it was compliance.




     5.  Computer systems were used for data storage for 53 percent




of agencies in air, water quality, and solid waste which monitor




chromium.  For water supply, fish and wildlife, and agriculture, the




data sheets were used for storage.




     6.  For 65 percent of agencies in all program areas monitoring




chromium, the use made of the data was in basic statistical analyses




for the agencies' own information files.







                                88

-------
     7.  Except for two solid waste agencies,  which reported at least




a five-year data retention period,  39 of 47 agencies in the program




areas where chromium is monitored retain (or intend to retain)  their




data for at least ten years.



     8.  Three of five air agencies retained portions of Hi-Vol




filter samples at least ten years,  and the minimum retention period




for any of them was five years.  In the other areas, agencies



generally do not retain samples after initial analysis unless levels




are significantly high and the samples may be required in litigation.



In those cases, samples are retained until litigation is resolved.




     9.  None of the five air agencies which monitor chromium submit



their data to SAROAD.  Five of 16 water supply agencies and 15 of 21



water quality agencies submit chromium data to STORET.



    10.  Sixty percent of all agencies analyze chromium at their own



laboratory.  The solid waste analysis is done by contracted laboratories,




and the fish and wildlife analysis is divided among contracted laboratories,



shared facilities, and one agency's own laboratory.



    11.  For all laboratories which do analyses for chromium, the



average number of laboratory personnel is 34, 17 of whom are degreed.



chemists.  Breakdowns of average personnel strength and number of



chemists for each program area are shown in Table 16.
                               89

-------
     12.  As was the case for all laboratories generally, the




most common form of training in laboratories which analyze for




chromium is on-the-job-training.  In some agencies this is supple-




mented with outside courses when resources and schedules allow.  None




of the agencies monitoring chromium had formal training programs.




     13.  In all program areas except air, the majority (81 percent) of




agencies had access to both gas chromatograph and atomic absorption




equipment for analysis.  All the air agencies had access to atomic




absorption equipment, which they used for analysis of chromium




and other toxic metals.




     14.  Of all agencies contacted which did analyses for chromium,




85 percent felt they could also monitor most other toxic substances




on the OTS list if a method of analysis were available and if the addi-




tional analytical burden did not interfere with their present work load.




     15.  For air, water, solid waste and fish and wildlife agencies,




the primary methods of analyses employed were standard atomic '




absorption methods recommended or endorsed by EPA.  Agricultural




agencies used standard methods recommended by the USDA and Associa-




tion of Official Analytical Chemists.




     16.  One air agency reported no quality control program, and




three water supply and six water quality agencies reported using




only internal quality control procedures.  All other agencies




monitoring chromium used,a combination of internal and external




quality control procedures in their laboratories.






                                 90

-------
     17.  There was considerable variety in what agencies viewed




as the future focus of toxic substances monitoring.  In general,




most air, water, solid waste, and fish and wildlife agencies ex-




pected to increase network size, number of samples, and number of




substances; although some agencies in each area expected the level




of effort to remain about the same.  Both agricultural agencies




monitoring chromium expected the level of monitoring to remain the




same in the near future.




     18.  Although there were a variety of responses from agencies




in all areas as to what assistance from EPA would be most useful,



two items continued to stand out.  These were that EPA should




develop standards for levels of substances in the environment and




standard methods for measuring the substances; and that EPA should




provide funds for additional manpower and equipment for toxic




substances monitoring.  After these two major items, there were




a variety of specific items mentioned by various agencies. (See Volume




V tables for other items mentioned).




Cyanide (See Table 17)




     1.  In the 20 states contacted cyanide is monitored at 19,647 sites,




All these sites are either water supplied or water quality stations.




     2.  There are on the average about 44,000 analyses done for




cyanide per year by water supply, water quality, fish and wildlife,




and agricultural agencies.  The bulk of these are in the water




media.



                                 91

-------
                       TABLE 17
SUMMARY OF MONITORING CAPABILITY FOR CYANIDE IN 20 STATES
PROGRAM AREA
i'ttuCKAM
l>LSi:Kiri<>K
1 . TOTAL SITES
., TOTAL OIISERVA-
" T1DNS PER YEAH
1. PERCENT DATA
RECEIVED
4. MONITORING
OBJFCTIVE
5. STORAGE FORM
b. USE OF DATA
7. DATA RETENTION
TIME
8. SAMPLE RETENTION
TIME
9. STORET/SAROAD
10. LAB TYPE
H. AVC. NO. LAB
PERSONNEL/
CHEMISTS
11. TYPE TRAINING
1). LABS WITH
GC i AA
1.4 . CAN 1)0 ADDITIONAL
TOXIC SUBSTANCES
15. ANALYSIS METHOD
!(.. QUALITY CONTROL
17. FUTURE MONITOR INC
FOCUS
18. HELP DESIRED
AIR
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
WATER
SUPPLY
12,609
7,322
80
POPULATION
VAR.
STATISTICS
10+yrs
- 0 -
4 of 10
OWN LAB
17/9
OJT +
9 of 10
8 of 10
APHA/EPA
INT./KXT.
VAR.
VAR.
WATKR
DUALITY
7 ,0.'1K
24,880
92
COMPLIANCE
COMPUTER
STATISTICS
10+yrs
- 0 -
11 of 12
OWN LAB
20/11
0.1 T
10 of 12
9 of 12
APHA/EPA
INT. /EXT.
VAR.
VAR.
SOLI 11
WASTK
-
-
100
COMPLIANCE
DATA SHEETS
STATISTICS
5+yrs
- 0 -
-
CONTRACTED
40/35
OJT +
1 of I
1 of 1
EPA
INT. /EXT.
INCR. NET.,
MORE T.S.
$
HUMAN
MKALT11
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- 0 -
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
FISH t,
W1LDI.IFE
-
6,000
- 0 -
BACKGROUND
DATA SHEETS
CHECKED
lOfyrs
- 0 -
-
OWN LAB
5/3
OJT +
1 of 1
1 of 1
EPA
INT. /EXT.
MORE T.S.
$
AI;KI-
('IILTI'KE
-
6,000
- 0 -
COMPLIANCE
DATA SHEETS
STATISTICS
10+yrs
- 0 -
-
OWN LAB
4]/27
OJT
2 of 2
2 of 2
I'SDA/AOAC
INT./FXT.
REMAIN SAME
STDS.
                         92

-------
     3.  For all agencies monitoring cyanide in the 20 states, data




was obtained from 77 percent.  This percentage includes agencies




submitting data to STORET or another Federal program directly.  All




agencies with cyanide data indicated their willingness to submit




updates in the future if required.




     4.  The predominant monitoring objectives were population oriented




for water supply agencies, (i.e., checking levels which may endanger




human health), determination of background levels for fish and wildlife,




and compliance oriented for water quality, solid waste, and agricultural




programs.




     5.  The most commonly data storage form was the computer for



water quality, divided between the computer and data sheets for water




supply, and data sheets for fish and wildlife and agricultural agencies.





     6.  Fish and wildlife cyanide data is checked to see if levels




are significantly high.  For other program areas, the main use of




the data is in some basic statistical analysis.




     7.  The solid waste agency monitoring cyanide retains that




data at least five years.  For all other areas the retention time




is at least 10 years.              .




     8.  No agency contacted keeps samples after they have been




analyzed for cyanide unless high levels ate encountered and the




samples may be needed in litigation.  In these cases the samples




are retained until the litigation is resolved.




     9.  Four of 10 water supply agencies submit cyanide data to




STORET, as do 11 of 12 water quality agencies.  No air agency





                                 93

-------
monitors cyanide.


     10.   Except for solid waste,  where analysis is done by lab-


oratories under contract,  the majority of agencies performed the

analyses in their own laboratory.


     11.  The average number of personnel in laboratories conducting


cyanide analyses in the 20 states is 25, 16 of whom are degreed


chemists.  Table 17 shows -the average breakdown of personnel and

degreed chemists per laboratory in each program area.

     12.  The most common type of training is on-the-job-training,


supplemented in some agencies by outside training courses.  No

laboratory reported a formal training program.

     13.  Of the agencies monitoring cyanide, 89 percent had both

gas chromatograph and atomic absorption equipment.

     14.   Eighty-one  percent  of  the  agencies  monitoring  cyanide

 felt  they had  the  capability for  analyzing most additional toxic  sub-

 stances  on  the OTS list if analysis methods  were available.  -All  the

 agencies  felt  they could  do  at  least some additional substances.

 Resources would be required  in  most cases for more people and equip-
                                       i
 ment  if  analytical requirements were significantly expanded.

      15.  The  primary method used for  determining  cyanide in water

 is  the standard colorimetric method endorsed  by  the  American Public


Health Association and EPA.   For solid waste and fish and wildlife,

EPA's recommended standard method  is reported to be used.  In

agriculture, the standard  method recommended by the USDA and the


                                94

-------
Association of Official Analytical Chemists is used.




     16.  Two water supply and two water quality agencies reported




using only internal quality control procedures in the laboratory.




All other agencies used procedures of quality control that included




both internal checks and interlaboratory testing.



     17.  There were a variety of views as to the future focus of



toxic substances monitoring among the various agencies.  In water



supply and water quality, there was a split among agencies which



expected to increase sampling and network size, increase number of




substances sampled, and maintain about the same level of effort.



The one solid waste agency expected to increase both sampling and



the number of substances monitored.  The one fish and wildlife



agency monitoring cyanide expected to monitor more toxic substances.



Agricultural agencies expected to remain at about the same level



of effort, with perhaps some increase in the number of substances



monitored.




     18.  There were a variety of items that the agencies would



like in the way of assistance from EPA, but again these were in



two primary categories.  The agencies would like EPA to develop



standards for levels of toxic substances in the environment and



standard methods for measuring new substances, and they would like



additional funds for more people and equipment.  There also was



a large variety of specific items mentioned by the agencies.
                                95

-------
Lead (See Table 18)




     1.  Lead is monitored at 25,058 sites in the 20 states, which




is all but 461 of the total toxic substances monitoring sites




reported.  All water supply and solid waste sites are used to monitor




lead, as are most of the sites for air, water quality,  and fish and




wildlife.




     2.  There are about 110,000 analyses done for lead per year by




agencies in the 20 states.  This is more analyses than for any




other single toxic substance.  About 80 percent of the observations




are  in the air and water media.




     3.  For all agencies contacted with lead data, about 90 percent




of the data is counted as received.  This includes agencies reporting




data to the SAROAD and STORET systems and to other Federal programs




directly.  The reasons that some lead data was not received are




discussed in Volume III by agency.




     4.  For 54 percent of agencies in air, solid waste, fish'




and wildlife, and agriculture, the main reason given for monitoring




lead was to determine background levels.  In both air and agriculture




there were also a number of agencies who reported the objective




as population oriented and compliance.  In the areas of water supply




and human health, 20 of 34 agencies considered lead monitoring to




be populatation oriented.  For the 14 of 30 water quality agencies,




monitoring was done to ensure compliance with regulations.
                                 96

-------
                     TABLE 18
SUMMARV OF MONITORING CAPABILITY FOR LEAD IN 20 STATES
PROGRAM AREA
PROGRAM
DESCRIPTOR
1. TOTAL SITES
TOTAL OBSERVA-
2 • TIONS PER YEAR
3 PERCENT DATA
RECEIVED
; MONITORING
OBJECTIVE
5. STORAGE FORM
6. USE OF DATA
, DATA RETENTION
' TIME
8 SAMPLE RETENTION
TIME
9. STORET/SAROAD
10. LAB TYPE
,. AVG. NO. LAB
PERSONNEL/
CHEMISTS
12. TYPE TRAINING
13. LABS WITH
GC ( AA
14. CAN DO ADDITIONAL
TOXIC SUBSTANCES
15. ANALYSIS METHOD
16. QUALITY CONTROL
17. FUTURE MONITORING
FOCUS
18. HELP DESIRED
AIR
565
16,522
95
BACKGROUND
DATA SHEETS
STATISTICS
lOfyrs
10+yrs
3 of 21
OWN LAB
31/13
3JT +
12 of 21
16 of 21
EFA
INT. /EXT.
INCR. NET
TORE T.S.
VAR.
WATER
SUPPLY
15,612
24,262
as
POPULATION
DATA SHEETS
STATISTICS
lOfyrs
- 0 -
6 of 17
OWN LAB
18/10
OJT
14 of 17
12 of 17
APHA/EFA
INT.)EXT.
VAR.
$. VAR.
WATER
QUALITY
8,812
' 43,846
92
COMPLIANCE
COMPUTER
STATISTICS
lOfyrs
- 0 -
15 of 24 .
OWN LAB
18/11
OJT +
20 of 24
22 of 24
EFA/APHA
INT./EJCT.
MORE T.S.
VAR.
$, VAR.
SOLID
WASTE
30
120
100
BACKGROUND
COMPUTER
STATISTICS
5+yrs
- 0 -
N.A.
CONTRACTED
170/25
OJT +
1 of 1
1 of 1
EPA
INT. /EXT.
MORE T.S.
S, VAR.
HUMAN
HEALTH
-
4,230
78
POPULATION
DATA SHEETS
VAR.
lOfyro
VAR.
N.A.
OWN LAB
77/28
OJT
7 of 9
8 of 9
EPA/ FDA
INT. /EXT.
VAR.
$, VAR.
FISH i
WILDLIFE
39
9,330
80
BACKGROUND
DATA SHEETS
STATISTICS
10+yrs
- 0 -
N.A.
VAR.
30/24
OJT >
5 of 5
4 of 5
VAR.
INT. /EXT.
VAR.
STDS., $
ACRI-
C1T.TURE
_
11,748
90
COMPLIANCE.
BACKGROUND
DATA SHEETS
COMPLIANCE
lOfyrs
- 0 -
N.A.
OWN LAB
31/16
OJT
9 of 10
9 of 10
AOAC
INT. /EXT.
REMAIN SAKE
STDS., S
                         97

-------
     5.  For water quality and solid waste agencies monitoring



lead, the most common data storage from is by computer.  For all



other agencies, the most common form is data sheets.



     6.  For most agencies in most program areas, the predominant use



made.of the data after ft is generated is basic statistical analysis



for  the agencies' information files.



     7.  Solid waste agencies report that they maintain data files



for  at least five years.  Eighty-one percent of all other agencies



keep data records for at least 10 years.



     8.  The most common air sample retention time for agencies



monitoring lead is at least 10 years.  Some human health and



agricultural samples are retained for shorter periods of time, but



for  the most part, with the exception of air filters, samples are



not  retained after analyses are completed.  In some agencies,



samples showing high lead levels will be retained for possible use .



in litigation.   These samples would be kept until the cases were



resolved.



 '    9.  Three of 20 air agencies which monitor lead submit their



data to SAROAD.  Six of 17 water supply agencies and 15 of 24 water



quality agencies submit data to STORET.



    10.  Sixty-seven percent of the agencies in all program areas
                                       t


except solid waste and fish and wildlife analyze for lead in their own



laboratories.   In solid waste the analysis is done by a laboratory



under contract, and in fish and wildlife,  agencies use their own


                                        i

laboratories,  contracted laboratories,  and laboratories shared with
                                 98

-------
other agencies.




     11.  For all laboratories where lead is analyzed in the 20 states,




the average number of personnel per laboratory is 54 and an average




of 18 of those are degreed chemists.  The breakdown of average




proportions by program area is shown in Table 18.




     12.  Training in 81 of 84 laboratories where lead is monitored




is on-the-job-training, supplemented by some outside courses when




possible.  None of the laboratories reported having a formal




training program.




     13.  For all program areas, 78 percent of the agencies had




access to both gas chromatograph and atomic absorption equipment.




Fewer air agencies had gas chromatograph equipment than was the case




in other program areas, but lead and all the other toxic substances




presently monitored in air can be analyzed by atomic absorption




methods, and all air agencies had atomic absorption units.




     14.  Of the agencies monitoring lead, 83 percent felt they



were capable of monitoring most additional toxic substances on the




OTS list if required and if a method of analysis existed.  If the




additional analysis burden interfered with their existing work load,




however, many agencies felt they would nee,d more manpower.




     15.  The prevailing standard methods for lead analysis for air




and solid waste agencies are those recommended or endorsed by EPA.




Water agencies, had preference for the .EPA and the American Public




Health Association standard methods.  Human health was divided
                                   99

-------
between FDA and EPA methods,  agricultural agencies primarily used




Association of Official Analytical Chemists recommendations, and




fish and wildlife agencies were divided among methods recommended




by EPA, the American Public Health Association, the Association




of Official Analytical Chemists, and the instrument manufacturer.




     16.  Two air agencies reported no quality control programs in




effect, and 20 agencies across all program areas had only internal




quality control procedures.  The majority of agencies (45 of 82)




in all program areas, however, had programs which included both




internal and external quality control procedures.  Internal checks




included calibration, standards and duplicate samples; and external




procedures ranged from check samples exchanged with other lab-




oratories to certification by the appropraite association or




Federal agency.




     17.  Responses from agencies regarding how they saw the future




focus of toxic substances monitoring varied considerably from




agency to agency.  Most of the air agencies foresaw increases,




either in the amount of sampling or the number of substances




sampled.  In water the prevalent expectation was for more substances




to be monitored, as was the case in solid waste.  In human health,




agencies were almost evenly split among the choices of increasing




amount of sampling, decreasing amount of sampling, increasing




number of substances sampled, and remaining about the same; and
                                   100

-------
a somewhat ainilar split waa found in tha fiah and wildUfa



programs.  The prevalent expectation among agricultural agencies




was that the monitoring level-of-effort would remain about the




same. •



     18.  As was reported for other substances, agencies which




monitor lead had a variety of responses when asked what assistance




from EPA would be most helpful to them.  Nevertheless two themes




continued to predominate.  These were a need for EPA to develop




standards for levels of toxic substances in the environment and



standards for measurement of new substances, and a need for EPA




to provide funds for more personnel and equipment.




Mercury (See Table 19)



      1.  Mercury was monitored at 19,866 sites in the 20 states,



all but 117 of which were water supply or water quality stations




in the 20 states.




      2.  There are about 78,900 analyses done for mercury each year,



and nearly 70 percent of these involved samples analyzed by water



agencies.




      3.  For all agencies contacted in the 20 states which had



mercury data, data was received from 75 percent.  Data which was



not received is discussed in Volume III.




      4.  Monitoring objectives varied by program area.  The primary



objective for air and fish and wildlife agencies monitoring mercury



was to determine background levels.  Compliance and population



orientation (i.e., checking for levels hazardous to human health)



were the main objectives of most agencies in the other program areas.




                                101

-------
                      TABLE 19
SUMMARY OF MONITORING CAPABILITY FQR MERCURY IN 20 STATES
PROGRAM AREA
PWIUKAM
DESCRIPTOR
1. TOTAL SITES
, TOTAL OBSERVA-
' TIONS PER VEAR
3. PERCENT DATA
RECEIVED
4 . MONITORING
OBJECTIVE
5. STORAGE FORM
6. USE OF DATA
, DATA RETENTION
' TIME
8 SAMPLE RETENTION
' TIME
9. STORET/SAROAD
10. LAB TYPE
11. AVG. NO. LAB
PERSONNEL/
CHKMISTS
12. TYPE TRAINING
13. LABS WITH
GC & AA
14 . CAN DO ADDITIONAL
TOXIC SUBSTANCES
15. ANALYSIS METHOD
16. QUALITY CONTROL
17. FUTURE MONITORING
FOCUS
18. HELP DESIRED
AIR
65
2,158
75
BACKGROUND
DATA SHEETS
VAR.
lOfyrs
10+yrs
1 of 4
OWN LAB
40/7
OJT +
3 of 4
4 of 4
EPA
INT. /EXT.
INCR. NET
MORE T.S.
STDS., VAR.
WATER
SUPPLY
10,723
,11,000
62
POPULATION
DATA SHEETS
STATISTICS
lOtyrs
- 0 -
5 of 13
OHN LAB
16/11
OJT +
10 of 13
9 of 13
EPA/APHA
INT. /EXT.
VAR.
$, VAR.
WATER
QUALITY
9,026
43,204
82
COMPLIANCE,
VAR.
COMPUTER
STATISTICS
lOt-yrs
- 0 -
14 of 21
OWN LAB
15/11
OJT +
17 of 22
17 of 22
EPA/APHA.
INT. /EXT.
VAR.
$, VAR.
SOLID
WASTE
30 -
1ZO
100
COMPLIANCE
COMPUTER
STATISTICS
5+yrs
- 0 -
-
CONTRACTED
105/30
OJT +
2 of 2
2 of 2
EPA
INT. /EXT.
INCR. NET
MORE T.S.
S
HUMAN
HEALTH
-
3,530
80
POPULATION
DATA SHEETS
STUDIES
lO+yrs
-0-, VAR.
-
OWN LAB
93/34
OJT
5 of 5
5 of 5
VAR.
TNT. /EXT.
VAR.
VAR.
FISH &
WILDLIFE
22
7,167
80
BACKGROUND
DATA SHEETS
STATISTICS
lOfyrs
- 0 -
-
VAR.
17/12
OJT +
7 of 10
7 of 10
EPA/APHA
INT. /EXT.
INCR. NET
M3RE T.S.
$
AGRI-
CULTURE
-
11,723
67
POPULATION/
COMPLIANCF
DATA SHEETS
CHECKED
VAR.
- 0 -
-
OWN LAB
32/16
OJT
7 of 9
7 of 9
VAR.
INT. /EXT.
REMAIN SAME
STDS., VAR.
                      102

-------
     5.  Except for water quality and solid waste, where most of



the agencies computerized their data, the most common form of




data storage was data sheets.




     6.  Human health agencies usually used their mercury data in




detailed studies of potential health effects, and agricultural




agencies checked the data to be sure no significantly high levels



were encountered.  For 64 percent of the other agencies, the data




was processed for basic statistics for their own information files.



     7.  In solid waste, data was expected to be kept for at least




five years, and in agriculture the time period varied among agencies



from one year to more than 10 years.-  For most of the remaining



agencies, data records were expected to be kept at least 10 years.



     8.  Air agencies monitoring mercury generally keep portions of



Hi-Vol air filters for 10 or more years, and human health agencies



keep some samples for short periods of time.  Most of the other



agencies, however, do not retain samples after analysis unless



high levels are determined and there may be a need for the sample




in litigation.  In such cases, samples are retained until the




litigation is resolved.



     9.  One of four air agencies monitoring mercury submits the



data to SAROAD.  Five of 13 water supply agencies and 14 of 21




water quality agencies submit data to STORE!.
                                  103

-------
      10.   Forty of 64 agencies  have their own laboratories  for




 mercury analyses.   The solid  waste agencies  contract  their  analyses




 to other  laboratories;  and  of the  seven  fish and wildlife agencies




 monitoring mercury,  three have  their own laboratories,  three  share




 facilities with other agencies,  and one  contracts  for the analyses.




      11.   For  all  laboratories  doing analyses for mercury in  the




 20 states,  the average number of personnel per agency is 45,  17 of




 whom are  degreed chemists.  The average  personnel breakdown by




 agency is shown in Table 19.




      12.   For  all  agencies  contacted,  except one in water supply




 and one in fish and  wildlife  which reported  no program, the train-




 ing carried on in  the laboratories is  primarily on-the-job type




 training.   In  several agencies  this is supplemented by  occasional




 outside training courses.   No agency reported a formal  training




 program.




      13.   As Table 19 shows,  nearly all  agencies in all program




 areas have access  to both gas chromatograph  and atomic  absorption




 equipment.




      14.   Of all agencies monitoring mercury,  79 percent felt they




 were capable  of monitoring most toxic substances on  the OTS  list if




' required.   The conditions  were  that a method of analysis be  available




 and that  no undue additional analytical burden be placed on  their




 staffs unless funds were provided for more  people.






                                 104

-------
     15.  Except in the areas of human health and agriculture, the




prevalent standard methods of analysis for mercury in the various




media were those recommended or endorsed by EPA.  In human health




and agricultural agencies, the standard methods referenced were




those of the FDA, TJSDA, EPA, Association of Official Analytical




Chemists, and American Public Health Association.




     16.  One air agency reported no quality control program, and




nine  agencies  in other program areas  reported  only  internal



quality control  procedures.  For  30 of  a  total of 54  agencies,



quality control procedures included both internal checks and inter-



laboratory testing.




     17.  Views of the anticipated future focus of toxic substances



monitoring differed within and among program areas.   For the most



part,  air, water, solid waste and fish and wildlife agencies



expected Increases in amount of sampling and in number of substances



monitored.  The prevalent expectation for human health and agri-



cultural agencies was that the level of effort would remain about



the same.



     18.  When agencies monitoring mercury were asked what assis-



tance from EPA would be most helpful,  there were a wide variety



of responses.  However, two themes predominated.  The agencies



wanted EPA to develop standards for levels of toxic substances in



the environment and standard methods of measurement for new sub-



stances, and they wanted additional funds for personnel and
                                105

-------
equipment.  After those two principal items, there were a wide range




of other specific items mentioned by individual agencies.




PCB's • (See Table 19)




     1.  In the 20 states contacted, PCB's were monitored at a total




of 3,246 sites.  Most of these were.water supply and water quality sites,




and there was no reported monitoring of PCB's at air or solid waste sites,




     2.  The total number of analyses made for PCB's per year was




36,390.  The largest number of analyses were performed by agricultural




agencies, mainly as a sideline of chlorinated hydrocarbon pesticide




residue analysis.




     3.  For all agencies contacted which had PCB data, data was




counted as received from 87 percent.  This includes agencies which




submitted data to STORET or to another Federal program.  Data which




was not received is discussed in Volume III.




     4.  The main objective of monitoring PCB's in the fish and wild-




life program area was to determine background levels.  Water supply




and human health agencies conducted monitoring for population-




oriented objectives, and the primary objective of water quality and




agricultural agencies was compliance.




     5.  For most water agencies, the computer was the data




storage form.  For most other agencies the data was stored on data




sheets.




     6.  Once generated, the data was used in basic statistical




analysis for their own information by most water agencies.  Most health
                                 106

-------
                      TABLE 20
SUMMARY OF MONITORING CAPABILITY FOR KB IN 20 STATES
PROGRAM AREA
PROGRAM
DESCRIPTOR
1. TOTAL SITES
2 TOTAL OBSERVA-
' TIONS PER YEAR
3. PERCENT DATA
RECEIVED
4 MONITORING
OBJECTIVE
5. STORAGE FORM
6. USE OF DATA
7 DATA RETENTION
' TIME
g SAMPLE RETENTION
' TIME
9. STORET/SAROAD
10. LAB TYPE
,, AVG. NO. LAB
' PERSONNEL/
CHEMISTS
12. TYPE TRAINING
13. LABS WITH
GC & AA
CAN DO ADDITIONAL
14. TOXIC SUBSTANCES
15. ANALYSIS METHOD
16. QUALITY CONTROL
,, FUTURE MONITORING
' FOCUS
18. HELP DESIRED
AIR
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
WATER
SUPPLY
2,535
1,02«
60
POPULATION
COMPUTER
STATISTICS
10+yrs
- 0 -
2 of 5
OWN LAB
10/8
OUT +
3 of 5
2 of 5
VAR.
INT. /EXT.
MORE T.S.
$
WATER
QUALITY
693
10,270
ino
COMPLIANCE
COMPUTER
STATISTICS
10+yrs
- 0 -
5 of 8
OWN LAB
16/12
OJT
8 of 8
8 of 8
EPA/APHA
INT. /EXT.
VAR.
VAR.
SOLID
WASTE
-
-
-
' -
-
-
' -
-
-
• -
-
-
-
-
- i
-
. - ,
-
MllMAN
HEALTH
-
3,100
50
POPULATION
DATA SHEETS
STUDIES
10+yr«
- 0 -
N.A.
OWN LAB
206/80
OJT
2 of 2
2 of 2
PDA/ EPA
INT. /EXT.
INCR. NET
VAR.
FISH &
.WILDLIFE
18
7,012
100
BACKGROUND
DATA SHEETS
STUDIES
10+yrs
- 0 -
N.A.
OWN LAB
13/7
OJT +
3 of 4
3 of 4
EPA
INT. /EXT.
MORE T.S.
$
ACHI-
U'LTURE
-
14,984
91
POPULATION
DATA SHEETS
CHECKED
10+yrs
- 0 -
N.A.
OWN LAB
31/16
OJT
11 of 11
11 of 11
FDA/AOAC
INT. /EXT.
REMAIN SAME
STDS., S
                       107

-------
and fish and wildlife agencies used the data in preparing detailed
studies.  In agriculture, the data was routinely checked for signi-
ficantly high levels.
      7.  For 68 percent of agencies in all program areas, data
on PCB's was expected to be retained at least 10 years.
      8.  Agencies analyzing for PCB's generally did not retain
samples after analysis.  The only exception  was when high levels
were determined and the sample might be needed in litigation.  In
these cases samples were usually retained until the  litigation was
resolved.
      9. Two of five water supply agencies and five of eight water
quality agencies report that they submit their PCS data to STORET.
     10.  All human health, fish and wildlife, and agricultural
agencies monitoring PCB's perform the analysis in their own lab-
oratories,  as do nine of the 14 water agencies.
     11.  For all laboratories analyzing for PCB's, the average
personnel strength is 55, 25 of whom are degreed chemists.  Table 20
shows the breakdown of average personnel strength by program area.
     12.  One fish and wildlife agency reported no training program
in the laboratory.  Otherwise, nearly all agencies conducted on-
the-job-training with occasional outside courses.
      13.  Ninety  percent of  agencies monitoring  PCB's  have  access  to
both atomic absorption and gas chromatograph equipment.  The latter
is used in PCB analysis.
                                108

-------
     14.  Nearly 87 percent of all agencies monitoring PCB's felt


 they had the capability to monitor most additional toxic substances


on the OTS list if they were required to do so.  The only conditions


were that a method of analysis would be available for any new toxic


substance,  and that manpower assistance would be provided if the


additional analytical burden were significant.


      15.  The most common among a variety of analysis methods

 referenced by the agencies were those recommended by the American


 Public Health Association and EPA for water analysis; and the


 recommendations of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists,


 EPA, and FDA for agencies in human health, fish and wildlife, and


 agriculture.


     16.  One agricultural agency reported no quality control


 program, and two water and two agricultural agencies reported having


 only internal quality control procedures.  The remainder of the 30


 agencies monitoring PCB's had both internal and external quality


 control procedures.  Internal procedures .generally included cali-


 brations, standards, and duplicate samples.  External procedures

          i
 involved exchanging check samples with appropriate Federal and


 other laboratories.


     17.  The opinions of the agencies with regard to expected  future


focus of monitoring varied from agency to-agency.   However,  the


prevailing view in the water and fish and wildlife agencies was


that the number of samples and number of toxic substances monitored



                                 109

-------
 would  increase in the  near  future.   The  two human  health agencies




 were divided  between increased  sampling  and remaining  at the  same




 level.  Seven  of  13 agricultural agencies felt monitoring of




 toxic  substances  would remain at about the same  level  as in recent




 years.




     18.   On  the  question of  what assistance  from  EPA  would be most




 helpful, 52 percent of the agencies stated that they could most use




 funds for personnel and equipment.   The second most common




 response  among these agencies was that EPA should  develop  standards




 for levels of toxic  substances  in the environment  and  standard




 methods of analysis  for new toxic substances.  After those two




 common responses, there were  a  variety of specific items mentioned




 by the agencies.




 Other  Toxic Substances




     No agency in the  20 states contacted monitored any of the




 other  toxic substances of interest,  although  in  Connecticut,  Florida,




and Iowa there has been some limited specific  testing for  several




of the  substances  in  recent  months.
                                110

-------
          SECTION 3
  TOXIC SUBSTANCES PROBLEMS
AS PERCEIVED BY STATE AGENCIES
              111

-------
INTRODUCTION




     A detailed discussion and presentation of summaries and analyses




of the state agencies' toxic substances data has been included under  '




separate cover as Volume IV of this final report.  The Volume IV pre-




sentation includes a review of all the data that was made available by




environmental,, health, and various other agencies in 20 states during




the course of this project.  Because of the large volume and very wide



variety of data in many media acquired on a number of the toxic sub-



stances of interest, and lack of consistency in sites, sampling fre-




quency, and type of samples, it has not been possible within the re-



sources of this project to prepare a comprehensive interpretive analy-



sis of the situation with regard to each substance in the United States



today.  Additionally, the problem of analysis of a large amount of dif-



ferent, discrete, ambient data on a nation-wide scale has been com-



pounded by data and information gaps in the areas of source identifica-



tion information, health effects data, and the non-inclusion of ambient



data already submitted to Federal data systems.  Nevertheless, within :



the constraints of using only data provided by the agencies in 20 states



as a base, an overview analysis of each toxic substance can be provided




in terms of:  general background information on the substance; why and



how the state agencies perceive the substance as an environmental prob-



lem; what they believe to be the main sources of the substance in the



environment; what trends their monitoring data show; and how they deal



with any environmental threats posed by the substance.
       Preceding page blank
113

-------
     The remainder of this section consists of narrative overall analy-




sis for each toxic substance based on the state data summaries and




analyses contained in Volume IV.  At the outset of each discussion,




there is a brief background summary describing the substance and its




known and suspected impacts, based on the existing literature familiar




to nearly all the state agency officials contacted.  From that point on,




the discussion for each toxic substance is based on the data and infor-




mation which was provided by the state agency officials themselves and




summarized and analyzed by MITRE.




     Arsenic




     Arsenic compounds have long been known to be highly toxic and to




accumulate readily in the human body.  In addition to acute cases of




ingestion and resulting poisoning, arsenic from the environment may




enter the human body through inhalation, ingestion of food, water,




and dust, and absorption through the skin.  The principal means of




excreting arsenic is through urine, and the body burden is also




lowered through feces, skin, nails and hair.  Ingestion of arsenic




has been shown to cause dermatitis, heratosis, nausea, stomach pain,




diarrhea or constipation, and edema, with the fatal dosage in the range




of 70-180 mg.  Inhalation causes bronchitis, nasal irritation, and in




concentrated exposures, perforation of the nasal septum.  From long




term exposure, arsenic is believed to be carcinogenic, affecting the




skin, lungs, and liver; and there is some evidence that it may be




teratogenic as well.  The potential carcinogenic effect of arsenic






                                 114

-------
Is probably the moit serious from an environmental point of view,



since the arsenic can accumulate in the body over long periods of



low-level exposure in the environment.



     Officials of state agencies, because of familiarity with the



existing literature as well as from their own experiences, were



aware of the principal environmental sources of arsenic.  Besides



trace amounts which are believed to be naturally occurring and which



occasionally are detected in drinking water supplies and surface and



groundwater, there are several widely recognized areas of man-made arsenic


contamination.  Two of these are the processing of gold, copper,  and other



ores, including extraction and smelting; and residues resulting from



pesticides used in the past which contained arsenic compounds such



as lead arsenate.  Besides these main sources, coal combustion is



also believed to release small amounts of arsenic, as are some other



specific Industrial processes, and some phosphate detergents contain



arsenic concentrations which are drained into waterways.



     Because of the types of sources of arsenic, every type of



monitoring agency has been involved in testing for arsenic in the 20



states contacted.  Public drinking water supply agencies have



monitored arsenic in all of the 20 states contacted.  However, except



for one or two localized, temporary problems in a few states, all



water supplies have consistently been determined to be well within



the Public Health Service standard of 0.05 mg/1 for arsenic.  The
                                                                       !


vast majority of drinking water supplies sampled have, In fact, been
                                 115

-------
reported as below the detectable limits of the method of analysis




employed.  Iowa has noted that arsenic levels in raw water supplies




sometimes exceed the standards, but the levels drop after treat-




ment for iron removal.  Several states monitor agricultural foods




routinely for arsenic because of its use in the organic form as




a growth stimulant in feeds and also because of its use in pesticides.




     The most outstanding environmental problems of arsenic pollution




were reported from Tacoma, Washington and from El Paso, Texas.  The




Tacoma problem, according to state officials, arises from a copper




smelter which is the largest source of arsenic in the western hemisphere.




An extensive program of environmental monitoring is being pursued and a




report sould be available soon through EPA Region X.  Preliminary find-




ings indicate a major output of arsenic into the atmosphere.  Samples




have been taken from humans, soil, water and air in the vicinity of the




smelter.  The early results showed that household dust had up to 427 ppm,



hair up to 104 ppm and soil up to 797 ppm arsenic.  The result-s have shown




a correlation between the distance from the smelter and the concentration




of arsenic in samples.  In general, samples from sites and residents near-




est to the smelter showed larger levels of the metal and these levels di-




minish with increasing distance from it.  Arsenic levels in workers in the




smelter were similar to levels in residents of the immediate area of the




smelter.  An examination of death records also revealed an in-




creasing incidence of respiratory cancer among men who worked in the




smelter.  Arsenic was also a major pollutant in the emissions from






                                 116

-------
smelters in El Paso, Texas.  The epidemological studies carried




out in El Paso have not attributed specific cases of illnesses to




arsenic.  The emphasis in the El Paso study was on monitoring lead




to substantiate its role in health effects which were demonstrated




in residents of the immediate area.




     Other states monitoring arsenic in air as a part of their




heavy-metal program are New York, Pennsylvania, Tennessee,  and




Michigan.  None of these states has reported any unusually  high




levels in ambient air and therefore no problems of arsenic  air pol-




lution are thought to exist.  All the states contacted have monitored




their water supplies for arsenic.  It is usually done on the same




frequency as the other metals:  annually,  biennially or triennially.




Iowa is the only state contacted that has reported a localized




problem of contamination, in surface water in Charles City, which




has been traced by state officials to a pharmaceutical laboratory.




New York has monitored solid waste leachate for arsenic from about




30 sites on a quarterly basis since 1973.   From 22 samples  done




over that period from some of the sites, the average values were




relatively low, ranging between 0.0 and 0.19 mg/1.




     To summarize the activities of the states with respect to




arsenic the following were the highlights:




     •  Arsenic is monitored in water by all 20 states.  Iowa was




the only state that report a localized case of arsenic pollution
                                 117

-------
in water.


    •  Six states monitored for arsenic in air:   New York, Pennsylvania,


Tennessee, Michigan, Texas and Washington.  In Texas (El Paso) and


Washington (Tacoma), arsenic from smelters is a probable health hazard.


    •  Human and household samples have been analyzed in Texas,


Colorado, California and Washington.  Vacuum dust from houses in


El Paso and Tacoma showed very concentrated levels of arsenic.


    •  Arsenic is monitored routinely in agricultural products in


about 10 states:  Connecticut, New York, Pennsylvania, Georgia,


North Carolina, Tennessee, Michigan, Utah, California and Oregon.


    •  Arsenic was not viewed by state agencies as a widespread


environmental problem outside of El Paso, Texas, and Tacoma, Washington.


     Beryllium


     Over the past 30 years, the toxicity of beryllium has been


established with regard to industrial exposure.   The most common


route of intoxication is through inhalation of dust or fumes  '


containing beryllium and its compounds.  Some uncertainty remains as


to the pathogenesis of beryllium disease, but the principal effect


is felt in the lungs and respiratory tract.  Acute poisoning causes


inflammation of the upper air passages leading to a pneumonia-like

                                    t
condition with fever, cough, and shortnens of breath.  The disease


may last up to three months if it is not fatal,  and in some cases


chronic effects follow the acute form of the disease.  Additional


acute effects may include contact dermatitis, conjunctivitis, and



                                 118

-------
corneal burns.  The main chronic effects of long term exposure to




beryllium are granulomatous changes in the lungs.  Granulated lesions




are distributed throughout the lungs, which lead to coughing,




progressive shortness of breath, weight loss, and sometimes fever




and nausea.  In some cases, weight loss is so severe that it may




cause death in a matter of months.  As beryllium disease progresses,




granulomatous inflammation .is frequently followed by scarring of




lung tissue and damage to the heart.  Beryllium compounds have




caused carcinoma of the lungs in laboratory rats and monkeys, but



the evidence that beryllium is carcinogenic, to humans is not yet




conclusive.




   State agency officials contacted were generally aware of the




toxicity of beryllium and of the principal sources of the metal and




its compounds in the environment.  Extraction of beryl ore.in Utah




is one potential source.  The bulk of beryllium ore, however, is




imported; and processing of the ore is concentrated in Pennsylvania




and Ohio.  While the chief hazard of exposure in processing plants




has involved the workers, cases of neighborhood contamination have




been reported in the literature.  In these cases it was generally




concluded that exposure resulted not so much from breathing contami-




nated air near processing plants, but rather from contact with




beryllium dust from such sources as workman's clothing and shoes.




   Beryllium has a number of very beneficial properties that make it




useful in a variety of industries.  These properties include stability,






                                 119

-------
high melting point, high strength-to-weight ratio, extreme hardness,




and excellent ductility.  When used as an alloy, it imparts increased




resistance to shock, vibration, and corrosion to other metals.




Because of these and other properties, beryllium and beryllium




compounds have a wide variety of useful applications, ranging from




the aerospace and nuclear industries to the manufacture of bicycle




spokes, jewelry, and spark plugs.  Consequently, there is a wide




dispersion of the potential sources of beryllium contamination.




According to the state agency officials contacted,  however, there




have not been reported cases of environmental contamination from




these potential sources and the known cases involving beryllium




disease resulted from occupational exposure.  This was confirmed in




discussions with staff members at the national Berylium  Case




Registry at Massachusetts General Hospital.  Of more than 800 cases




reported to the Registry, nearly all were the result of occupational




exposure. ..




   Despite its known toxicity, and its known occupational hazards,




beryllium was not generally considered an- environmental threat by




state agency officials.  This is reflected in the fact that it is the




least monitored of all eight toxic substances on which states had




some data.   Because the main threat to human health is through




inhalation,  most of the monitoring that was done was carried on by




air agencies.   These were the agencies for the states of Connecticut,




New York,  Pennsylvania, Tennessee,  Utah,  and Michigan;  and Wayne






                                 120

-------
 County  (Detroit), Michigan.   In Utah, the monitoring was source-




 oriented.   Three  Hi-Vol  samplers were operated near the only known




 beryllium mining  operation in the United States.  Data from Utah was




 in the .process of being validated and compiled, and was not available when




 this report was prepared.  The agency director stated that beryllium levels




 were usually very low, and that monitoring was done to see that they



 remained  that way.  For  the other states beryllium was one of a




 number  of metals analyzed to  determine ambient background levels in




 the air throughout  the state.  In virtually all of this data, levels




 of beryllium were at  or  near  the minimum detectable level.




   Other  than air,  the only agencies with data on beryllium were the




 water quality agencies in Pennsylvania and New York.  In New York,




 one of  the  primary  reasons for monitoring beryllium was that the




 monitoring  program  is operated in cooperation with USGS, and




 beryllium is one of the metals which USGS regularly monitored in an




 extensive five year period.   One of the reasons for monitoring




 beryllium in Pennsylvania water is that that state is a major processor




 of beryl ore.  Since both of these states include their data in the




 STORE! system,  the data was not acquired at MITRE for summary and




 analysis.




     Cadmium



     Cadmium is  one  of the heavy metals which  is  widely used  in




industry for electro-plating and alloying in conjunction with lead,




zinc or nickel.   These uses  expose workers  to  fumes,  and the  products
                                 121

-------
of plating  and alloying are often used in food utensils which can
contaminate food.  The metal is usually manufactured as a by-product
of lead, arsenic and zinc.  Such mining operations release vast
quantities  of fumes and particulates which can further be transported
by water and air to other areas of the environment.  Cadmium is also
released in the environment by crops which feed on phosphatic
fertilizers which are obtained from naturally occurring rocks.  All
20 states have shown a concern for the metal and therefore have
monitored it in at least one media.  The concern over it stems from
its well established severe toxicity and suspected carcinogenic
property.   Much research has been done on its toxicity and the
literature  has many references  of studies and cases indicating the
toxic characteristics and  the concomitant disease from high levels in
animals and humans.  Disease from cadmium poisoning reveals damage
to the kidney, bone and lungs.
     While  none of the states which were visited reported any'
poisoning or disease outbreak as a result of cadmium ingestion, four
have reported its presence in the environment, and surveys were
initiated from the early 1970's to determine its concentration in
different media.   One of the most significant reports was from
California where high levels of cadmium vere found by the State
Department of Agriculture in lettuce and other leafy vegetables
grown in the Salinas Valley of the Monterrey Basin.   A team of
scientists and officials from the state resource and environmental

                                 122

-------
agencies and the Department of Toxicology at the University of

California at Davis was formed to investigate the extent of cadmium

pollution among other objectives.  A monitoring program was set up and

conducted up to the beginning of this year, and the data is now being

validated for inclusion in a forthcoming report by the project team.

Samples were taken from water, plants, soil, indigenous fauna (mainly

rodents and fish).  The preliminary findings indicated large concen-

trations of cadmium in many of the samples.  The results also showed

that levels In lettuce and spinach were several orders of magnitude

above the ambient soil concentration.  This led to the tentative con-

clusion that such leafy crops had an affinity for the metal which was

stored in the leaves and tended to be at higher levels in the older

leaves of the same plant.  Preliminary findings suggest that the source

was naturally occurring deposits of cadmium from phosphatic rocks which

had eroded into the valley in which the vegetables were grown.  This

discovery of high cadmium levels in the Salinas Valley caused the tern-
                     \
porary discontinuation of spinach production from the area.  Independent

studies were conducted by the state's Division of Geology and Mines and

these phosphatic rocks were found to contain levels of cadmium as high

as 625 ppm, as determined from 350 samples taken from 4-6 foot cores.

The details of results from both surveys were not yet available,

although published reports are anticipated soon.

     There was a major concern with source emission of cadmium in

El Paso, Texas.  This resulted from a smelting complex which


                                123

-------
is a major source of lead, copper and zinc.  The operators of the


smelter were taken to court and charged with violating the city/


county and state standards for particulates, and they were ordered to


institute the necessary installations for reducing the volume of par-


ticulate emissions.  Particulates were monitored in El Paso with Hi-Vol


sampling apparatus, from which samples were composited and analyzed


for cadmium and other trace metals (see the arsenic and lead discussions) .


High levels of cadmium were found at all the sites throughout the


sampling area.  In 1972, 132 samples were analyzed from 23 sites,


and the average value varied between 0.006 and 1.3 fig/m  of cadmium.


For 1973, 238 samples were analyzed from 20 sites and gave an aver-


age value varying between 0.01 and 0.45 jj.g/m .  The 1974 average

                                       3
values varied between 0.01 and 0.5 fig/m , with the 1975 values

                          3
between 0.03 and 0.32 ng/m  cadmium.   The data generally showed a
decline in levels of cadmium over the 4-year period and reflected


the use of additional controls on the stacks of the smelters. .


A wide range of dust and soil samples were also analyzed and cadmium


levels were unusually high.  Illnesses which developed among residents


in the immediate smelter area were attributed to lead poisoning, which


was the predominant pollutant in the particulate emissions.  No casu-


alties of cadmium toxification were specifically identified, nor was


any synergistic correlation established with lead or the other toxic


metals present.
                                 124

-------
     In Washington and Idaho where copper and lead smelters are operated,




cadmium was also monitored in the samples taken from humans,  water,  air,




dust and soil in the affected areas.  While the thrust of the effort in




Washington concerned arsenic, cadmium was also determined.   The available




data obtained by MITRE includes only five soil samples which were tested




for cadmium in 1972.  A more comprehensive report is being prepared




and will undoubtedly include a wider range of samples.  The five samples




showed a range of 4 to 16 ppm of the metal.  A preliminary conclusion




from the Washington study is that death records showed an increased




incidence of respiratory cancer among men who worked in the smelter.




The cause of this was mainly attributed by state investigators to




arsenic, but since cadmium is also suspected to be carcinogenic its




role cannot be ignored.  The Washington environmental agencies in-




volved anticipate a more extensive investigation of the heavy-metal




problem during which the specific role of single metals might be more




clearly defined.  The monitoring program in Kellogg, Idaho, a-




joint venture involving the State, EPA and CDC, will be a compre-




hensive investigation in the mold of the El Paso study.  Data has




been made available to the EPA Regional Office, and a final report




is in preparation.




     Other states monitoring cadmium in air are Connecticut,




Delaware, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Michigan, Missouri, Colorado and




California.  The values reported of ambient concentration in areas




outside of the smelter influence are very low and range from no






                                 125

-------
detection to hundredths of a microgram per cubic meter.  All the




states report that they monitor water supplies for cadmium.  No




drinking water supply has indicated any appreciable levels and most




record levels below detection limit of the atomic absorption instru-




mentation.




     Connecticut, Massachusetts, New Jersey, and California have mon-




itored cadmium in sea foods.  In Massachusetts, between 1971 and 1973,




there were 141 determinations for cadmium in shellfish, and the aver-




age concentrations ranged from 0.14 to 0.78 ppm.  During the same




period 42 samples of finfish were tested and average values varied




between 0.0 and 0.83 ppm.  Six hundred and twenty two (622) sediment




samples taken from the same waters over the same period revealed




average values of 2.37 to 14.74 ppm.  The results indicated that cadmium




wastes were getting into the waterways, and were thought by the state




agencies to be due primarily to plating industries.  At the same time the




water itself showed average levels of 0.003 to 0.02 ppm from the analyses



of over 400 water samples.  The heavy metal survey in Connecticut from




1970 to 1974 investigated shellfish contamination.  Cadmium was




determined in 78 samples from different water bodies and the average



value varied between 0.5 and 8 ppm.   Six states — Connecticut, New




York, Florida, North Carolina, Colorado and Idaho — reportedly




monitor agricultural products for cadmium.  No state except California




has found any excessive levels in any. of the products tested.




Connecticut has also been doing additional research on the uptake of
                                 126

-------
 cadmium  and other heavy metals from soil fertilized with sanitary

 sludge.   Colorado has done bioaasays with cadmium using fish and other

 aquatic  insects to evaluate tolerance levels, as well as the re-

 sulting  physiological and anatomical defects which might be induced

 by the metal.

     With regard to analytical procedures employed in the states, the

 initial  efforts to analyze samples for cadmium were set back by

 difficulties in developing reproducible analytical procedures among

 the participants from the different agency laboratories.  This was

 of specific relevance in California where the validity of high cadmium

 values concerned the researchers.  Eventually, methods were satis-

 factorily worked out to effect adequate interlaboratory practices
                       i
 which gave confirmatory assurances to the results.  All laboratories

 report that they use atomic absorption spectrophotometry except in
                       t
 California and Texas, where X-ray fluorescence (XRF) is used in air

 analyses.

     All  20 states put cadmium high on their priority list in

monitoring for trace metals.  All have monitored it to some extent

 in water, and most indicate that a more frequent and comprehensive
                                        i
program will emerge with the implementation of the Safe Drinking

Water Act.  In the states where cadmium has been identified as a

pollutant from stationary sources, the indication is that close

monitoring will be continued, and the industries have cooperated

 in the monitoring and further control of emissions with additional
                                 127

-------
equipment.  The data from sediment and biota indicate that cadmium

wastes are getting into waterways, and the states have instituted

additional discharge guidelines and closer surveillance of effluents.

For example, Connecticut has specified that industrial wastes should

contain no more than 0.5 ppm cadmium prior to discharge into the

waterways.  Although there is a US Public Health Service (US PHS)

maximum limit of 0.01 ppm for drinking water, most states have not

imposed local guidelines for water supplies; nor are there any for

air emissions separate from particulate standards.

     Chromium

     Chromium was formerly regarded only as a toxic substance with

no known beneficial value to human biologic activities.  In 1974 the

National Academy of Sciences noted, however, that it was indeed an es-

sential element in minute concentration for plants, animals and man.  A

deficiency of chromium in the body has been known to cause impairment in

glucose metabolism because of an apparent ineffectiveness of insulin.

There is no known incidence of adverse effects from excessive in-

gestion or inhalation of chromium from the ambient environment.  Injuries

and illnesses resulting from the contact with or use of chromium compounds

have occurred through accidents or with workers experiencing con-

tinuous exposure over a period of time.  The respiratory tract and

fat tissues have been found to accumulate it more than other
                       i
tissues, but high levels have also been found in the skin, muscle,  fat

and the pancreas in reported cases.


                                 128

-------
     Chromium is the fourth most abundant essential trace element




and is found occurring in combination with other elements in ores




and other deposits, and is widely used in industry for plating and




alloying.  It is found in soil, plants, air and water and can result




from natural sources, industrial wastes or from the burning of wood




and coal.  The two most significant forms are the trivalent, stable




and nontoxic form;and the water-soluble, corrosive, toxic, hexavalent




form.  Because of its suspected carcinogenic characteristic as well as




the adverse health effects observed among industrial workers in




chrome plating industries, most of the 20 states contacted have




monitored for chromium in at least one media.    Some states have




been monitoring for hexavalent and total chromium, while the majority




only monitor  for total chromium.  None of the states have reported




any incidence of contamination in the water or food industries, but




several have reported cases of chromium wastes getting in water




systems mostly from plating industries.  A summary of the salient




findings from the states follows.




     Connecticut, Tennessee, Texas and Missouri,  were the only



states in which chromium was monitored in the air.  In 1973, 107




composite air samples were analyzed by St. Louis City for chromium.




The average values for all eight sites varied between 0.001 and




0.016 |jg/m .  For the same year 199 quarterly composite air samples




from about 55 sites in Connecticut were analyzed.  These are low




levels and would not seem to indicate any direct source of emission.
                                 129

-------
The average values per site varied between 0.0015 and 0.0120




In Connecticut and New York, chromium has been monitored for




the past two years in ground water from wells in the vicinity




of solid waste disposal areas.  No significant  levels were  reported




in the  results of  chemical  analyses.  Food laboratories under  the




state departments  of  agriculture  in Connecticut, New York and




California  check  food products routinely  and none has reported any




appreciable levels of the metal.  Fish  surveys  for  heavy metals  in




California,  Connecticut and Massachusetts have  checked  different





varieties  of shell and fin fish  for  chromium.   The  results  from  a shell-




fish survey in Connecticut show  low  levels of  chromium.  Eighty  five




samples were analyzed and  gave average  values  of 0.60 to 1.60  ppm.  The




survey  in  Massachusetts included samples of  fish, sludge, core and




sediments.   Between  1971 and 1974, 141  samples  of shellfish were ana-




lyzed for  chromium.   The average values of chromium reported varied




between 0.91 and  2.25 ppm  for the four  years.   Finfish  reported  some-




what lower  levels of  between 0.3 and 0.96 ppm from  60 samples  analyzed




between 1971 and  1973.  Sediment  samples  analyzed between 1971 and 1973




revealed average values of  12.2  to 175.4  ppm.   The  level of the  metal de-



tected  in water was substantially lower and  ranged  between  0.12  and




0.0002  ppm  according  to results of 382  water samples analyzed  between 1971




and  1972.   The high levels  of chromium  noted in these Massachusetts samples




were attributed by the state  agency to  industrial waste from plating




industries.  The  high level in the sediment  and biota with  contrastingly






                                  130

-------
low levels in water further illustrate the build-up  of  trace  contaminants




in the food chain even though levels in the ambient  water  are low.




     All 20 states monitor water systems for chromium.   The systems




chosen are either ones involved in a public water supply or rivers




and streams known or suspected to be receiving industrial  wastes,




which are thus checked for discharge compliance.   Drinking water




sources in 15 states—Connecticut, Missouri, Georgia,  New  York,



Washington, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, Utah, Colorado,  Florida,




Tennessee, Iowa, California and Texas—are monitored routinely for



the metal.  In Missouri and most of the other states,  chromium, like




other trace metals, is determined infrequently—every one,  two, or




three years.  None of the data reveals any appreciable amounts of the



metal in any drinking water supply, and Invariably the levels are




below the APHA's limit of 0.05 ppm hexavalent chromium.  In-many




cases trace amounts are below levels detectable with atomic absorp-



tion spectrophotometry.



     The water pollution agency in the .County/City of Jacksonville,



Florida, monitors chromium in streams that receive waste from plating



industries or from utilities that use chromium salts as anticorrosive



agents in cooling systems.  It was noted that waste water  from air  con-




ditioning equipment is suspected by the agency of containing chromium




salts.  The agency has expressed concern over the difficulty of deter-




mining the chemical constituents of such materials,  as they only carry trade



names without labels indicating their chemical composition.  However, the






                                 1.31

-------
chemical analyses done on water samples from streams receiving the




effluent have not shown any excessive concentration of chromium.




     In review of discussions with state agencies and an assessment of




available state data, there is no  major pollution problem evident




with chromium with regard to reported health effects in any area of the




environment.  Nevertheless, all the states are quite aware of the po-




tential deleterious effects of chromium and have indicated their de-




cision to continue monitoring it in sensitive areas of the environment.





     Cyanide




     Cyanide has been well known as a very potently toxic substance.




Research has shown that the presence of cyanide in water will inhibit




biologic activities.  For example, it was shown that above 0.1 mg/liter




the substance is toxic to fish and above 0.3 mg/liter it inhibits the




activity of the bacteria responsible for self-purification of rivers.




Its toxic effects on the human system are also well recognized.  How-




ever, none of the 20 states visited reported any problem of cyanide




pollution.  Furthermore, most of the states do not monitor for it




routinely.  A common reason raised is that the cyanide ion is very




unstable in the presence of certain chemicals and hence it is not




easily detected.  For example, the ion is destroyed by chlorine




molecules in water.  Since cyanide is most likely to be transported by




waste water or potable water, both of which have a chlorine residual




from treatment, it would not be detected if it were tested for in such



waters.






                                 132

-------
     Cyanide salts may enter the environment as components of In-




dustrial wastes and can therefore be transported by water into aquatic




systems.  Likewise, solid materials containing cyanide disposed in




dumps and landfills could leach into surface or groundwater.  Tennessee




and Florida have ongoing programs to monitor streams in their dis-




charge surveillance networks, and Connecticut and New York have recently



initiated programs to monitor solid waste areas for it.  The data



collected thus far from these states indicates very low levels or




levels  below detection limits.   Other states monitoring water




supplies are Oregon,  Tennessee,  Utah, North Carolina,  Colorado,




Florida, New York,  Georgia,  Missouri, and California.   In every




state there have been no significant values reported.   For example,



the 1972 water quality data  from the state of New York shows that



167 systems were checked for cyanide arid at least 97 percent of them




showed no cyanide.   For those that indicated its presence, none



was above the allowable limit of 0.2 mg/liter.  All of these states



report that they use standard colorimetric methods which are




recommended for waters with low concentrations of cyanide.



     While all the states seem to recognize the very toxic nature



of cyanide, it is not viewed by them as a pollutant which poses any




immediate hazard in any area of the environment and is one of the



least monitored of  the eight toxic substances.
                                 133

-------
     Lead


     For at least several hundred years the health effects of lead



poisoning have been recognized.   More recently,  acute and chronic


lead intoxication from inhalation of fumes or ingestion of food,


drink, or materials containing high levels of lead has been shown



to impair blood-forming mechanisms resulting in  anemia; cause gastro-


intestinal bleeding; damage the kidneys and heart; and, in advanced



cases, attack the nervous system resulting in death or permanent


injury.  Chronic exposure to lead is a serious problem because over



and above a certain body burden level where lead uptake is balanced by


excretion through normal processes, lead tends to accumulate in the


system.  Except in cases of massive and acute exposure, lead



accumulates gradually over time, and the resulting illnesses develop


slowly and are difficult to identify.


     Besides its extreme toxicity, the principal reason lead is of


concern as an environmental contaminant is that it is found in


virtually all media of the environment.  Lead is useful in such a


wide variety of applications that there is consequently more of it
                                      i

produced commercially than any of the other toxic heavy metals.


Some of the more commonly known products with lead as a constituent



are batteries, paints, plastics, stabilizers, ceramic glazes, food


can sealants, and leaded gasoline.  From these kinds of products,


as well as from the basic mining and smelting processes which produce


the metal, and natural lead sources, lead enters all areas of the en-


vironment.  In all 20 states contacted, some lead at least in trace
                                134

-------
amounts had been found in the water,  in air,  and  in ceramics,  food,




and human blood.




     Many of the state agency officials were  aware of the more




familiar cases of acute lead poisoning in the literature.  These




cases involved inhaling lead fumes from burning automobile batteries,




exposure of workers in the smelting industry, and exposure of  workers




in the production of leaded gasoline.  Chronic environmental,  as



opposed to industrial  lead intoxication cases were also known to




the state agencies.  These were generally of  two types:  ingestion




over a period of time of food and drink from ceramic containers




which leached lead, and exposure through pica of young children in




older houses where paint contains high levels of lead.  The latter




type of case was known to be a common problem in large cities with




old housing areas, especially in the east and industrial midvrest.




As regards airborne lead, states were aware of the role of auto




emissions and specific industries such as smelters and refineries;




they were also aware of the difficulty of establishing a clear




cause-and-effect link between levels of lead in the air and adverse




health effects.




     As a'result of public concern, legislative requirements,  and a




widespread awareness among state monitoring agencies of the potential




problems of lead as an environmental toxic substance, lead was




monitored by agencies in one or more media in all 20 states contacted,




The two most prevalent media where lead data was generated were






                                135

-------
drinking water supply and food and food-related materials,  since




these were the areas where human exposure and consumption are direct.




Water supply agencies in all the states included lead among, the




toxic metals which they monitored.  With the exception of several




of the more than 1,000 water supplies analyzed for toxic metals for




the first time in Missouri, reported lead levels in the public




water supplies in the 20 states were below the Public Health Service




standard of 0.05 mg/1.  In the majority of cases, lead levels were




below the detectable limits of the atomic absorption analysis




methods employed.  Because levels were consistently low, and because




of the large number of supplies to be sampled, any given public




supply in the states would generally have lead analysis done only




once every two or three years.  In summary, lead contamination of




public drinking water supplies is not viewed as a general or widespread




problem by the states, but because of the toxicity of lead and the




potential hazard, lead is a substance requiring periodic monitoring.




     Food and food-related materials are monitored sporadically for




lead content by state agricultural agencies, health departments, or




both to some extent .as in the states of California, North Carolina,




and Michigan.  For the most part, samples are analyzed for lead




because of a complaint or request from the public.  According to




agency officials, there is usually a spate of such requests whenever




there is press coverage of the rare occurrences of lead poisoning




from food or utensils.  On the rare occasions where agencies detected







                                 136

-------
high lead levels in food (none of which were reported in the data




for 1971-1974 time frame), the source was believed to be lead used in




solder in the food canning process.  According to a spokesman for




the .National Canners Association contacted during the course of this




project, improved canning techniques have now largely eliminated this




source of lead in food.  Lead from utensils—principally earthenware




cups, pitchers, bowls and casseroles with lead glazes—were more




frequently tested for lead than was food.  In each of the 20 states,




the health and/or agricultural agency has done some analysis of




lead leaching from ceramic samples.  After a high-interest period




in the early 1970's, the number of samples analyzed has now dwindled




to about 10-20 per state per year.  Agencies now report that detection




of lead leaching is rare, and it is even more rare that levels exceed




the 7 mg/1 which the FDA considers the safe limit for use with food




or drink.  State health officials in California indicated that a bill




has been drafted to safeguard against lead contamination from foreign




pottery.  This is expected to be achieved through independent




chemical analyses of materials used in the manufacture of utensils.




The largest amount of data on utensils was obtained from the Colorado




health agency, where 824 samples were analyzed from 1971-1974.  Of




these, 687 resulted in no lead detected.  In cases where the FDA




limit was exceeded, the sample was returned to the owner with the




warning that it should not be used to contain food or drink.




     While the major toxic substances monitoring involvement of state




fish and wildlife agencies has been with mercury analysis, several
                                137

-------
have also monitored other substances including lead.   In Colorado,




bioassays were underway to determine maximum acceptable toxicant




concentrations of lead and several other metals on fish and aquatic




insects.  The objective of that effort was to develop proposed




standards for levels of toxic substances in water, and to determine




if insects could be used as indicators of toxic substances contamina-




tion.  Besides bioassays, ambient samples were also analyzed.  While




insufficient samples were taken for firm conclusions  to be drawn,




the results indicated that organisms tend to accumulate significant




amounts of lead even when the water environment contains only small




amounts of the substance.  A toxic metal survey in Massachusetts,




which included analysis for lead in shellfish and finfish, similarly




indicates that aquatic organisms will tend to accumulate lead at a




higher level than that present in the surrounding water.  Sources




in Colorado were believed to be mine drainage and natural occurrence,




while Massachusetts officials attributed lead contamination to  a




variety of industries and treatment plants discharging into the




state's waterways.  Besides fisheries, another concern with, lead




was poisoning of game birds through ingestion of lead shot. Data




from Washington and Colorado indicate that ingestion of a single




pellet may cause lead poisoning in birds.  The problem was




sufficiently widespread in one area of Colorado that hunters were




required to use steel shot only.




     Lead is monitored by the majority of state water pollution
                                138

-------
control authorities.  Many of the larger water monitoring programs,




such as in Pennsylvania, Mew York,  North Carolina, Tennessee,  Colorado,




Oregon, Utah, and others, report their data on a routine basis to




the Federal STORE! system.  All of that water analysis for lead, con-




sequently, was not acquired by MITRE during this project.  From the




remaining data that was acquired and analyzed on lead in surface




and groundwater, levels were found to be significantly high only




near areas where mine drainage has occurred as in several western




states and the Missouri lead belt; and in areas with industries and




treatment plants discharging into water.  In the Massachusetts toxic




metals survey discussed earlier, river water samples analyzed for lead




in 1972 averaged 1.17 mg/1, with a maximum of 190  mg/1.  For the same




year, sediment samples had a mean of 150.87 mg/kg and a maximum of




2,000 mg/kg, indicating considerable accumulation of lead in bottom




sediments.




     State air quality agencies are presently required to monitor




only those air pollutants for which standards have been established,




and lead is not included among them.   Nevertheless, reflecting




concern with the estimated 180,000 tons of lead emitted annually by




mobile sources and additional emissions from local industrial sources,




many air agencies analyze their total suspended particulate samples




for lead content.  While there is no national standard for airborne




lead as yet, there appears to be consensus, as state agencies see it,




among EPA and other organizations, such as the World Health Organization







                                 139

-------
and the National Academy of Sciences, that lead in the amount of

        3
2-3 ug/m  of air may result in higher than normal blood lead levels in


humans.  Most state air agency lead monitoring consequently is routine


population and background-oriented to determine if existing levels

                     3
are near the 2-3 fig/m  range.  Analyzed results of lead monitoring


in Pennsylvania, Connecticut, Georgia, Tennessee, Texas, California,


Michigan, Florida, Missouri, Oregon, Delaware, and New York reveal


that with the exception of one or two source-oriented sites per state,

                                            3
annual averages are usually less than 2 (ig/m .  Two exceptions to


these lower background levels are evident in the results of data


analysis from specific source-oriented monitoring conducted in


California and in El Paso, Texas.


     The California survey was made following lead poisoning among


horses in the Carquiney Strait area of Northern California.  The con-


cern was that if horses were affected, hazardous levels of lead may


be entering the human food chain from airborne lead as well.  A


several-year study in communities in the northern and southern


areas of the state monitored air concentrations of lead, lead in


food from local groceries and home gardens, and blood lead levels


of children and adults in the study communities.  Air samples from

                                                   3
the southern communities frequently exceeded 2 ^g/m , with a

                          3
maximum level of 10.5 fjig/m ; in the northern communities, where
lead poisoning had been found in the horses, samples never exceeded


                                 140

-------
      o
1 |j.g/m .  From the data on the wide variety of food samples from


all areas, it was concluded that no significant amount of lead would


be ingested through the food chain, and no significant area


differences were, present.  Blood lead levels from the northern


communities were not in the range likely to be clinically important;


and the levels in the southern communities, while somewhat higher,


were well below the 40 p.g/ml considered by the U.S. Surgeon General


to be indicative of undue lead absorption.  In summary, the data


generated was inconclusive and analysis did not tie airborne lead


levels to significant human hazards either from the food chain or


from inhalation.


     In 1971, the El Paso City-County Health Department, in an


 investigation of a  large smelter  preparatory  to a  court .case


brought for violations of Texas sulfur  dioxide and particulate


 regulations, learned that the  smelter had  emitted 1,012 metric tons


 of lead in  the period 1969-1971.   As the  local officials were well


 aware of  the potential health hazards of  exposure  to  lead,  the  scope


 of the  investigation was immediately broadened to  include monitoring


 of human exposure to lead in  the  air.   First, air  filter samples  from


 1969-1971 were analyzed for lead;  then, after consultation with


 several recognized  authorities on the relationship of airborne


 lead to human health, blood lead  levels were determined for a


 sample of  the El Paso population.  Results showed  that 43 percent



                                141

-------
of those tested living within a mile of the smelter had levels exceed-


ing 40 fig/ml, and that this decreased to one percent two miles from


the smelter.  At this point, extensive sampling was undertaken


including air, dust, soil, paint, food, water, and pottery; and the


Center for Disease Control in Atlanta was asked for assistance in


human health effects testing.


     The findings indicate that ambient air near the smelter con-

                                                 3
tained very high concentrations of lead:  92 fig/m  annual mean in

                 3
1971, and 43 pig/m  mean from June 1972-July 1973.  Much of the lead


was in the respirable size range.  No other stationary sources were


found to emit significant amounts of lead, and correlations of lead-


bromine ratios in dustfall data indicated that mobile sources accounted


for only a small portion of the lead content.  Dust analysis also
                                        i

showed a geographical distribution of ,lead content similar to high


blood lead levels, indicating that where highest levels of lead would


be inhaled or ingested, blood lead levels were higher.  The data on


soil analysis was less conclusive and showed no clear relationships.


Paint ingestion could not account for age and geographic distribution


of lead absorption, although there was some evidence that children


did ingest lead-based paint.  Lead in food and water was found to be


negligible, and only 2.8 percent of households had pottery with


potentially dangerous lead content.  On the basis of the data gathered,


the El Paso agency concluded that at least within a one-mile radius


of the smelter, the smelter was the principal source of lead in the
                                142

-------
environment.  The courts have concurred,  and the smelter is enjoined


from discharging hazardous metals and has paid damages and medical


payments for those suffering chronic lead poisoning in the El Paso


area.  At present, except for the area immediately adjacent to the


smelter from which people were relocated, ambient lead levels are


below 2 ^g/m .



                       Blood Level Studies


     Many cities throughout the country have conducted blood lead


screening and,  on occasion, performed studies in attempts to


determine the sources of elevated blood lead levels.   For several


reasons, data from most of these activities was not acquired in the


course of the project.  Most of the meetings with state agency


officials were held at the state capital, and if the capital city or


a state agency had a lead program, then an attempt was made to


acquire that data.   With the priority of getting as much data as


possible on 17 toxic substances from as many state agencies as


possible, however, it was not considered resource- and time-effective


to attempt  to acquire blood lead data from every city in each state


which might perform some lead screening.   There were additional


problems with patient confidentiality, and the situation where the


results of many programs were already being reported directly to the


CDC in Atlanta.  Nevertheless, data on some blood screening was


acquired in the course of the state meetings.  In general, results
                    i                  ,

from California, North Carolina, Washington, Massachusetts, New Jersey,
                                143

-------
St. Louis, Missouri, and Allegheny County, Pennsylvania, indicated




that elevated blood lead levels in children, while still a problem




in the older sections of large cities, is becoming somewhat less




serious than was the case in the 1950*s and 1960fs when lead intoxica-




tion of inner city children was more common.  Then, as now, the




major source of the lead exposure is believed by agency officials




to be a children's habit referred to as pica, which involves eating




such materials as soil, flaking paint, and plaster,  containing




significant amounts of lead.  When agencies' blood lead screening




showed results over the generally accepted threshold of 40 jig/ml,




household inspections were conducted and orders were issued to remove




and/or repaint surfaces where paint was found to have high lead content.




Although several agencies (e.g., Allegheny County) attempted to deter-




mine sources of high blood lead levels other than ingestion of paint,




all studies except the El Paso case discussed above were inconclusive




in their results.  While agencies involved generally believed that




airborne lead in particulate and in settled dust contributed to




elevated blood levels, actionable data was only available on lead-




based paint ingestion.  Another study, also involving a lead smelting




complex, is underway in Kellogg, Idaho, with a joint task force involv-




ing the state, EPA, and CDC.  A similar comprehensive monitoring




approach to that used in El Paso is being employed,  and data on the




results of analysis should be available from EPA in the near future.
                                144

-------
     Mercury



     The problem of mercury pollution has been recurring in the United



States'during the last thirty years ever since mercury poisoning was



first reported in 1935 by the American Medical Association.  In that



instance a study was made of 529 workers in the fur cutting industry



where a mercury solution was used.  It was found that about 42 of the



workers were chronically poisoned with mercury.  Between 1953 and 1960,



111 persons in Japan were severely disabled and A3 were killed as a



result of consuming fish taken from Minamata Bay which had been con-



taminated with mercury from industrial wastes.  In addition, 19 babies



born to families from the same region had congenital defects even



though their mothers showed minimal or no symptoms of mercury poisoning.



Another episode of mercury poisoning was reported in the Japanese



island of Ron Shu in 1965.  In that instance 26 persons were poisoned and



five subsequently died.  The source of mercury was determined to be



fish containing 5 to 20 ppm mercury which was derived from industrial

                                       i    i

waste discharged in water and consumed by the fish.  One of the first



reports of mercury poisoning in the United States was made by the
                                       i


Center for Disease Control (CDC) in Atlanta in 1970.  The case concerned



the consumption of pork by a family in New Mexico from hogs which had



eaten mercury-treated grains.  High mercury levels were found in the



home-butchered hog and in the treated grain which had been fed to it.



Abnormally high concentrations were also found in human samples taken



from three of the ill family members as well as three other members who
                                  145

-------
 had not become ill.   In the  reported  cases where  mercury toxicity  has




 been established  in  humans,  the  hair  and  kidneys  are  found  to  have the




 highest levels.   The damages associated with  it include  brain  damage,




 kidney'malfunction and  muscular  atrophy.  It  has  also been  established




 that pregnant  mothers transmit the  substance  rapidly  to  fetuses  and




 many congenital damages to infants  have been  linked to mercury poisoning.




      Because of the  deleterious  effects of mercury, many of its  uses in




 medicine,  agriculture and industry  have been  banned and/or  curtailed.




 The activities of states in  monitoring mercury have involved most  media




 and have essentially been confined  to areas where pollution is known




 or  suspected.  Monitoring activities  were somewhat set back by the




 uncertainty of analytical methods in  more unconventional media such as




 .fish and animal tissue.  Initially, interlaboratory testing provided




 poor reproducibility of data in  some  states, but with  improved  instru-




 mentation  and  specially trained  laboratory personnel, most  state labo-




 ratories have  achieved  acceptable analysis for mercury in many media.




     Mercury was of concern to the health and environmental agencies




 in all of the 20 states contacted.  The results from the  surveys showed




 that in  those states that identified mercury pollution,  the source was




usually  believed by agencies to be from industrial wastes.  In Massachu-




 setts, mercury entering  surface and  ground water  systems was believed




by state officials to originate from a dye manufacturing  industry that




used mercury.   In Georgia,  mercury wastes were traced by  state agency




officials to caustic soda and chlorine manufacture (chlor-alkali




 industry).   Texas agencies reported  mercury  pollution from the aluminium
                                  146

-------
industry as well as from mercury smelting operations in areas of nat-




urally occurring mercury deposits.  The pollution in the state of New




York has been linked by officials there to the decomposition of nat-




urally occurring rocks.  In Tacoma, Washington, airborne particulates




from a copper smelter were believed to be the cause of mercury deposits




found in nearby soil samples.




     Mercury can enter the environment as liquid industrial waste,




airborne emissions from mining operations, or from other sources where




it is used, such as hospitals and agricultural processes.  The chemical




form (organic, inorganic, or elemental) present varies according to the




source.  It exists as inorganic chemical compounds in the waste from




chlor-alkali industry; it vaporizes from hospitals and other labora-




tories as elemental mercury; and it is found in agriculture, where  it is



used as a fungicide, as organic mercury (ethyl, methyl or phenyl)




derivatives.  In any of these forms, the substance is transported by




air or water or soil and may cause contamination in any of these forms.




The organic species are considerably more soluble in water arid are also




determined to be more toxic to organisms.  In water systems—rivers,




ponds or lakes—mercury travels rapidly to the bottom because of its




high density and insolubility.  From the sediments, it is picked up by




aquatic fauna and flora.  Fish may ingest it directly through their




gills or from other food such as planktons or smaller fish.  Further,




mercury tends to adhere to organic material from which bacterial




activity catalyzes its transformation into organic forms.  When mercury
                                147

-------
enters the body of an organism, it tends to accumulate as it seems to




be eliminated slowly.




     •The publicity resulting from the reported episodes of mercury




poisoning prompted environmental agencies in all 20 states to




initiate surveys to determine the extent of mercury contamination.




Monitoring in those states contacted has been concentrated on water




supplies, seafoods and agricultural products.  The ambient levels




reported vary greatly from state to state as well as within states.




A summary of the most significant programs follows.




     In Massachusetts, one industry used mercury in its process of




manufacturing dye.  Consequently, very large concentrations were




present in the effluents that left the plant and ended up in the




Sudbury River system by way of a small brook.  A survey conducted to




investigate the mercury problem in the state estimated that over a




30-year period in excess of 100,000 pounds of mercury were carried




into the river from this plant.  It was further estimated that




between 25,000 and 35,000 pounds of,the metal are presently contained




in sludge deposits on property in the vicinity of the plant.  Levels




as high as 4,985 ppm were recorded in 6-18 inch core samples taken




from the property.  Surface water samples analyzed recorded as much as




57 ppm mercury.  Sediment samples taken from a pond which received




water from the contaminated brook showed as much as 1,500 ppm mercury.




Over 90 percent of this concentration was in the top 12 inches,  The




levels of mercury discussed above were reported as total mercury, and
                                 L48

-------
methyl mercury was estimated by the state agency to be less than one




percent of the total value.  Groundwater samples taken from test wells




in the vicinity of mercury disposal sites showed high levels of as much




as 4,300 ppm as total mercury and 3,300 ppm as dissolved mercury from




a 41-foot well.  The concentration was somewhat lower for a shallower




well (12-feet deep), where values as high as 148 ppm and 118 ppm were




found for total dissolved mercury respectively.  One disconcerting impli-




cation of this data is that an area which was a recharge zone for the




underlying aquifer was overlain with concentrated mercury deposits




which were contaminating the groundwater.  These waters apparently




were not used for drinking and would be totally unsuitable for that




purpose as US PHS standards would not allow more than 0.05 ppm




mercury in drinking water supplies.




     Another survey was done on the Taunton River system in




Massachusetts which receives mercury wastes from another industrial




user of mercury.  Samples taken from sections of the river bed showed




levels which were as high as 173 ppm mercury,  and other samples from an




estuarine area showed total mercury as high as 131 ppm.  In another




trace metal investigation of the Boston Harbor, sediment analyses




showed mercury concentration of 0.92 to 5.70 ppm mercury.  The




Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Game conducted two mercury




surveys between July 1970 and March 1972.  in the first one




fifty-nine (59) fish from seven species taken from 27 random




statewide sites, were analyzed and showed mercury between




0.03 and 1.36 ppm.  Twenty-two fish had concentrations greater than






                                  149

-------
the F,D.A.'s limit of 0,5 ppnu  In the second survey, 148 fish made

up of yellow perch And largemouth bass, were analyzed,  The results

varied between 0.0 and 12.43 ppm.  The data from this as well as

others in the different states established a direct relationship

between the concentration in a fish and its size, weight, length, and

age.  The data from 211 shellfish analyses over four years (1971-1974)

showed mean levels between. 0.33 and 0»39 ppm mercury.  Between 1971

and 1972, 413 statewide water samples were analyzed for mercury with

mean values between 0.0002 and 0.012 ppm mercury.


     Mercury investigation in Georgia between 1971 and 1974 revealed

significant contamination of biota from two major river systems in

the state.  In 1971, 143 fish representing 20 species of finfish were

analyzed from the Savannah River with mean values between 0.07 and

1.54 ppm.  During this same period 14 species of shellfish and finfish

(97 fish) from the Brunswick River indicated mean values between 0.08

and 1.57 ppm.  For 1972, 136 samples from 16 species of finfish from

the Savannah River were analyzed, and mean values varied between 0.23 and

1.45 ppm mercury.  From the Brunswick River, 140 samples from 14 mixed

species (fin and shellfish) gave mean values between 0.21 and 1,79 ppm

mercury.  For 1973 and 1974 over 200 samples from 27 species of finfish

were do'ne and mean levels varied between 0.21 and 1.35 ppm of the metal.

These results indicate substantial contamination from two rivers that
                     \
were the recipients of mercury waste from two chlor-alkali industries.
                                 150

-------
Both rivers were closed to fishing for human consumption.  In

addition, water fowl and their food were analyzed for mercury.  Sixty-

three bird samples showed level'- between 0.01 and 9.45 with a mean of

1.72 ppm,  while 48 samples of food gave between 0.12 and 16.8 with a

mean of 1.88 ppm mercury.

     In Texas, a mercury survey was concentrated around estuarine areas

as a result of mercury wastes discharged into Lavaca Bay from aluminum

operations.  This bay showed the highest levels in the biota sampled.  Be-

tween 1971 and 1974, over 200 samples of fin and shellfish were analyzed

and mean values ranged from 0.02 to 1.0 ppm mercury.  In addition, fish

samples were taken from the Concho and Rio Grande Rivers and analyzed for

mercury.  The five species sampled from the Concho varied between 0.11

and 0.55 ppm.  In over 135 samples taken from nine species of finfish

recorded mean values were between 0.16 and 0.84 ppm.  These two river

systems were thought to receive drainage from areas with natural

deposits of mercury from which the metal is mined.


     In California, an Interagency Committee was formed in 1970 to

investigate mercury levels in the environment with samples from fish,

game birds, water, and sediments.  The fish data derived from 151

samples from 18 species indicate a range of 0.0 to 1.27 ppm,with over

30 percent exceeding the 0.5 ppm tolerance limit.  Of 20 samples of

harbor seals analyzed, a range of 0.23 to 3.10 ppm and a mean of 1.1 ppm
                           i
mercury was determined.  As in most states, water supplies were
                                 151

-------
generally below detectable limits.  The biota showed significant


mercury concentration, further substantiating the concept of bio-


magnification through the food chain from low ambient levels in water


and substantial concentrations in sediments.



     The Wildlife Division of the Michigan Department of Natural Re-


sources monitored birds and mammals for mercury.  Included were ducks,


pheasants, miscellaneous mammals, and birds.  Over 267 samples were


analyzed but only two varieties of ducks showed levels in excess of the


F.D.A.fs 0.5 ppm.  One set of 39 samples had a range of 0.01 to 1.76


ppm with mean of 0.65 and the other set of 32 samples ranged from 0.18 to


1.76 ppm with a mean of 0.76 ppm mercury.  Wayne County in Michigan


is one of the few jurisdictions in the nation which tests for mercury in


Hi-Vol particulate samples.  Quarterly composite samples for 1972

                                       3
revealed values of 0.05 to 2.03 of (ig/m  of mercury in the atmosphere.




      Fourteen  (14) samples of sediment from estuarine areas  in Washington


were  analyzed  for mercury.  Levels of mercury revealed a range of  0.9  to


7.8 ppm.  Thirty-seven wild pheasants were sampled and the results


showed only five birds had levels in excess of 0.5 ppm mercury, with
                                   i

high values of 4.8 and 4.6 in liver and breast tissues respectively.


In a study of metals emitted from the Tacoma smelter, five soil


samples were analyzed for mercury and results ranged from 2 to 10 ppm.


The samples were taken from the vicinity of the smelter so the source


of the metal was linked by state officials to the deposition of
                                152

-------
of airborne participates from the smelter.



     A shellfish survey for heavy metals showed very low levels of


mercury in Connecticut.  In over 85 samples analyzed, values ranged


from 0.0 to 0.18 ppm mercury.



     A study was conducted to determine mercury levels in food


samples in various areas o'f Idaho.  The samples included beef.


pork, poultry, grain, eggs, dry cereals, and a variety of other foods.


The results showed that none of the foods tested which were consumed


by humans contained organic mercury in excess of the 0.5 ppm FDA


limit.  The highest level observed was 0.4 ppm in a sample of chicken


liver.  Generally, all the foods with the exception of poultry and red


meat (pork and beef) were negative or contained very low mercury
                           i

levels.


     In a survey using 246 nheasants over a one-year period, it was


found that the highest levels of mercury contamination occurred in the


spring.  This indicated that the pheasants ate mercury treated grains


planted during the spring.  One set of 90 birds was collected in June


and July of 1970.  It was found that 80 percent contained detectable


mercury residues.  The mean level was 1.12 ppm and the range was from


0.05 to 7.6 ppm.  Forty-three (43) percent exceeded the 0.5 ppm limit.
(

These findings prompted the Idaho Department of Health to make certain


recommendations regarding the consumption of pheasants.  These included
                                 153

-------
a caution not to eat more than one meal of pheasant per week, a sug-




gestion to discard the back and giblets, and a warning that pregnant




women should avoid eating foods with suspected quantities of mercury.




Farmers were also advised to clean up treated grains and to use phenyl-




mercury instead of methyl- or ethyl-mercury treated grains.




     In 1970 a total of 160 fish samples from 19 species were




collected and analyzed.  Ninety-eight (98) percent showed detectable




levels of mercury with the highest level of 1.7 ppm in squawfish,  A




total of 19.3 percent exceeded the 0.5 ppm limit,  The data suggested




that channel catfish, yellow perch and suckers accumulate higher




mercury levels than other species from the same waters.  Fish from




reservoir sections of Snake River contained higher mercury concen-




trations than those from the free-flowing sections of the river.  The




contamination of Idaho waters with mercury has been traced to naturally




occurring mercury ores and to massive spills of mercury during mining




operations of the late 1800's.  These findings also resulted in the




State Health Department promulgating guidelines to citizens similar to




those for pheasants.  In addition, fishermen were advised to practice




"catch and release" in the Jordan Creek and Snake River reservoir which




were determined to be contaminated with mercury.




Conclusion




    The other states from whom data is available did some surveys,  but




none reported any serious contamination from mercury.   New York had
                                  154

-------
a localized problem of contamination from natural sources of mercury,



but studies have not become available as of the time of this writing.



In summary, the examples cited above show that mercury pollution has



been strongly evidenced in the aquatic eco-systems and has affected



the fauna from those systems more than any other facet of the



environment.



     One result of the series of surveys and investigations which



were initiated throughout the country in the early 1970's was the


reassurance that mercury was not as widespread in water and food in



the public marketplace as initially feared.  Invariably, all water



supply systems revealed none or exceedingly low amounts of mercury in



water that was being publicly consumed.  On the other hand, the find-



ings did delineate some features of mercury pollution.  For example,



contamination of fish in areas receiving mercury pollution was found



to vary directly with length, size and, less clearly, with the age.  It



is also related to positions in the food chain—those fish highest in



the chain tend to have larger amounts of mercury than was true

                            i
of those that feed among the bottom layers.



     In states that identified high levels of the substance in
                            i

commercial fishing areas, those areas were closed and/or closely



monitored.  In Georgia, sections of the Savannah River and the Brunswick



River were closed and when the sections were reopened, residents were



cautioned to avoid excessive consumption of fish from those areas.  In



Texas, the oyster industry was adversely affected by the identification



of mercury in Lavaca Bay.  Such occurrences resulted in economic loss
                                  155

-------
to the local fishing industries but the extent of such losses have not


been documented.  Whereas the toxic nature of different forms of mercury
           i
           I
has been documented in several publications based on research done

throughout the world, none of the state agencies contacted have noted

any human fatalities or cases of poisoning resulting from the consump-

tion of mercury-contaminated foods or from industrial exposure to the

metal or its compounds.  This, however, might only reveal a lack of

correlation of data between medical examiners' offices, hospitals and

clinics and other agencies rather than substantiate the absence of  mercury-

related illnesses or deaths.


      Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB's)

      Polychlorinated biphenyls were introduced in the United States

of America in the 1930's and their production was rapidly increased

to about 34,000 tons in 1970.  Up to that time they were widely used

in industry for many purposes such as platicizers, insulating

fluid in electrical devices  (transformers and capacitors), and as
          >
solvents.  It was not until 1968 that PCB's were identified as ?

injurious to human health.  This came about as the result of the

outbreak of Yusho disease in Japan.  The cause was traced to the

consumption of food which had been contaminated with a PCB chemical.

Although no incidents of poisoning in humans have been reported in


this nation, many states have been aware of the potential hazard of

PCB's and have been quick to investigate episodes of contamination

of agricultural foods and fish.  The concern over PCB's resulted
                                 156

-------
from the similar biochemical characteristics which they exhibit with




DDT and its other analogs.   These include toxicity to many organisms




and wildlife (0.1 ppm has been shown to be toxic to shrimp);  biomagni-




fication in the food chain;  and pervasive persistence in the  environment.




The literature on PCB's estimates that over 4,000 tons of these sub-




stances entered the nation's waterways annually up to 1970.




     The laboratory determination of PCB's in the states visited is




relatively new and resulted  from an almost inadvertent discovery of




interferences in pesticide residue analyses in the late 1960's.  Most of




the states worked closely with the FDA on the methodology for PCB sepa-




ration and identification and are now capable of making the determination




routinely, although a few states have indicated the need for  more




sophisticated gas chromatograph instrumentation.




     One of the first episodes of contamination reported in the U.S. was




the identification of PCB's  in oysters from Escambia Bay, Florida, in




April of 1969.  A survey revealed contamination of sediment,  water and




shellfish.  This incident was traced to leakage from an industrial plant




6 miles upstream from the Bay.  The leak was stopped but PCB's continued




to be present in the bay although in decreasing amounts.  At  the time




of the Florida visit many environmental agencies referred to  this episode,




which was published in the Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and




Toxicology in 1970.  Fishing was suspended in the bay but has since been




resumed.  Because of the past problem of PCB contamination cited in




Florida, the state Department of Pollution Control (DPC) has  noted that
                                 157

-------
efforts are being made to discourage the use of PCB's in old electrical




equipment and new installations are being required not to use PCB's in




their systems.  PCB's are currently monitored in water and sediments by




the DPC and in foods by the Pesticide Residue Laboratory, state




Department of Agriculture.




     In Massachusetts there was a survey between 1971 and 1973 to deter-




mine PCB's in fish from rivers throughout the state, and also to use




mussels as indicators of PCB pollution.  In the first study, levels of




PCB's as high as 32.8 ppm were determined in fish from one of the rivers.




A second survey revealed levels of PCB's as high as 79.5 ppm in fish,




while uncontaminated mussels introduced in suspected areas showed PCB's




as high as 36.5 ppm.  This presence of PCB's was traced by state officials




to an electrical components manufacturer adjacent to the area of the




stream found to have fish with the highest concentration of PCB's.  The




sediment from this area was also high in PCB's.  The study also served




to test laboratory methodology for the identification and quantification




of PCB's and other chlorinated hydrocarbons.




     The Georgia and North Carolina Departments of Agriculture reported




a major incident of PCB contamination of chickenswhich occurred in 1970.




A number of chickens had died and there was an evident thin-egg-shell




phenomenon which threatened chicken farmers in several states in the




region.  The contamination was traced to affected feed eaten by the




chickens.  In an extensive survey which followed, PCB's were detected  in




a wide variety of chicken and other farm products including eggs, tissue,
                                158

-------
milk, silage, feed, nesting material and compost.  Very large values of




PCB's were recorded in many of the media tested.  The highest was found




in nesting paper (shredded IBM paper), which had up to 32,000 ppm PCB.




A water survey was also carried out in 1973 from 39 stations on streams




from 11 river basins to determine PCB's.  Fifteen samples showed signif-




icant levels of PCB's ranging between 0.009 and 1.800 ppm.  The source of




this was also traced to an electrical components manufacturer.  In Texas




two surveys were made for PCB's.  The first one done by the Health Depart-




ment in the Rio Grande area between 1969 and 1972 dealt with 221 samples




of human fatty tissue obtained from elective surgery.  Seven percent of




the samples (15) showed PCB's ranging from 0.0 to 10 ppm and a mean of




0.1 ppm.  In the second, the Department of Agriculture analyzed 433 sed-




iment samples over a 23-month period which began in 1970.  The samples




were taken from 50 stations on eight major Texas rivers and three smaller




streams.  A total of 40 samples showed PCB's with a mean of 0.16 ppm.




The source of PCB's in the rivers was not identified,  but it was believed by




state officials to be an industrial discharger.




     The Iowa Pesticide Residue laboratory of the Department of Agricul-




ture picked up PCB's in fish and fishmeal.  Further studies were done




and some samples of fish (carp and buffalo fish)were found to have sig-




nificant levels of PCB's.  These kinds of fish had been used to manufac-




ture fishmeal which was also found to have correspondingly high levels




of PCB's.  Iowa has established a maximum allowable level of PCB's in




food of 2.0 ppm.  Analyses of 20 samples of fish showed PCB values be-
                                159

-------
tween (h!8 and 10.26 with a mean of 2.15 ppm.  Further investigation




was occurring but the source of the contamination was not determined




at the time of the visit.




     The monitoring activities for PCB's in the twenty states have been




centered around four areas.  They are agricultural products; fish and




other animal tissue; water and sediments from water bodies; and human




tissues.  Most states report their findings as aroclor, specifically




Aroclor 1248, 1250, or 1260.  These designations are references to the




manufacturer's trade names, and refer to the percentage composition of




chlorine and the aromatic constituent of the PCB's.  Aroclor 1248 denotes




12 percent of the aromatic constituent and 48 percent chlorine, while




1260 would likewise denote 12 percent aromatic and 60 percent chlorine.




None of the states indicated any differences in toxicity of the various




forms and seemed to have treated each with equal concern and attention.




The PCB's reported most frequently from the surveys were 1260 and 1248 or




were just reported as PCB's.  Apart from known or suspected cases of PCB




pollution the agencies do not monitor routinely for PCB's in fish or water,




and no case of PCB monitoring in air was reported by any state.  This is




surprising in view of the emissions reported in the literature of over




1,000 tons of the substance to the air, primarily from plasticizing in-




dustries.  The state agency which usually screens routinely for PCB's is




the pesticide residue laboratory which iu most states comes under the




state department of agriculture.  This laboratory functions primarily as a




pesticide regulating body.  A wide range of substances, including fruits,
                                 160

-------
vegetables, dairy and poultry products, are examined frequently to ensure

safety from pesticides.  PCB's can be identified qualitatively on the gas

chromatograph  when analysis is done for pesticides.  When this identifi-

cation occurs most of the states further check samples to quantify the

amount of PCB's present.  The states with such capability are Connecticut,

Georgia, New York, Florida, Tennessee, Oregon, North Carolina, Michigan,

Utah, Pennsylvania, California and Iowa.  States that did a survey for

PCB's in fish are Michigan, Massachusetts, Georgia, New York, Florida,

and California.  Most states do not monitor their water supplies for

the biphenyls, but whenever they are suspected analyses are carried
                              t
out.  Twelve states have tested water and sediments for PCB's (see

Table 11).

     PCB's continue to be of interest to these states.  Where industrial

contamination was identified, as in Florida, Georgia and Massachusetts,

agencies were able to get the industries to curtail or discontinue their

use of the substances.  Although PCB's have been found in fatty tissues

(in which they have been found to accumulate) from humans, there have

been no reported cases of poisoning or illness in any of the 20 states.

Only Iowa among these 20 states has an "action limit" on PCB's of 2 ppm.

The others have reacted to episodes of contamination of food products

by closing fishing areas or taking foods off the market.

     Other Toxic Substances   j

     There were nine other toxic substances on the list of those of in-

terest to OTS.  These were:  aryl phosphates; benzene; 3,3' dichloro-
                                161

-------
benzidlne; ethylene glycol; hydrazine; methyl chloroform; "Moca"




(4,4* methylene bis 2 chloroanaline); a napthylamine; and acrylonitrile.




None of these nine substances were routinely monitored by any agencies




contacted in any of the program areas.  However, several agencies




had done limited testing for benzene and methyl chloroform in water




recently.  These were specifically the Connecticut Health Department




and the Iowa Hygienic Laboratory, which analyzed some samples in




connection with occupational health programs; and the Florida Depart-




ment of Pollution Control, which conducted some limited analysis of




water samples for organics.  In none of the three instances was




data available for inclusion in this report.
                                162

-------