EPA-560/5-77-002
    A CONTINUOUS FLOW SYSTEM USING FISH AND
  AMPHIBIAN EGGS FOR BIOASSAY DETERMINATIONS
   ON EMBRYONIC MORTALITY AND TERATOGENESIS
                 FINAL TECHNICAL REPORT
                      APRIL 1977
              U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
                 OFFICE OF TOXIC SUBSTANCES
                   WASHINGTON.D.C. 20460

-------
                       NOTICE
     This report has been reviewed by the Office of Toxic
Substances, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, and
approved for publication.  Approval does not signify that
the contents necessarily reflect the views and policies
of the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency.  Mention of
tradenames or commercial products is for purposes of
clarity only and does not constitute endorsement or
recommendation for use.

-------
EPA-560/5-77-002
     A CONTINUOUS FLOW SYSTEM USING FISH AND AMPHIBIAN EGGS

                 FOR BIOASSAY DETERMINATIONS ON

              EMBRYONIC MORTALITY AND TERATOGENESIS
                               BY
                         Wesley J. Birge
                         Jeffrey A. Black
                  EPA Contract No. 68-01-4321

                      EPA Project Officer
                      I. Eugene Wallen, Ph.D.
                               For

             U. S. Environmental Protection Agency

                   Office of Toxic Substances
                   4th and M Streets,  S. W.
                   Washington, D. C.     20460
                           April  1977

-------
                               TABLE OF CONTENTS
SUBJECT
                                                         PAGE
 INTRODUCTION

 ADVANTAGES OF  FISH AND AMPHIBIAN EMBRYOS AS BIOASSAY TEST ORGANISMS

 BIOASSAY PROCEDURES
     Bioassay  System
     Modifications of Present Bioassay System
     Culture Water
     Test  Conditions and Monitoring Procedures
     Monitoring of Toxicant
     Test  Concentrations and Exposure Time
     Sample Size and Test Responses
     Selection of Animal Test Species

 FIGURES
     Figure 1.  Bioassay Screening of Environmental Pollutants
     Figure 2.  Continuous Flow Bioassay System
TABLES
     Table 1.
     Table 2.

     Table 3.

APPENDIX I:

APPENDIX II:

APPENDIX III:


BIBLIOGRAPHY
Performance of the Continuous Flow System
Syringe Pump and Peristaltic Pump Flow Rates and
Dilution Ratios
Synthetic Culture Water

SUPPORTING DATA (Figures 3-6; Tables 4-19)

SYNOPSIS OF BIOASSAY PROCEDURES

NORMAL AND TERATOGENIC STAGES OF RAINBOW TROUT
ALEVINS AND FRY (Plates I-VI)
                                                          6
                                                          6
                                                         11
                                                         11
                                                         14
                                                         15
                                                         17
                                                         17
                                                         18
                                                          5
                                                          7
 9
10

13

20

42

49


56
                                      ii

-------
                                    INTRODUCTION
     It is becoming increasingly apparent that,  concerning the toxic effects
of many environmental trace contaminants, embryonic and early juvenile stages
constitute the critical "sensitive links" in the life cycles of many animal
species (1, 24).  It appears plausible that reproductive potential  of natural
animal populations may be severely restricted or abolished by trace levels of
toxicants which are harmless or sublethal to most adult organisms.   Accordingly,
protective environmental standards and pollution abatement policies, which have
been based to a considerable extent on tolerances of adult animals, may not
provide adequate protection for embryonic development and reproduction of many
species.
     Numerous organic toxicants are known to inhibit animal  reproduction (1-18).
For example, Bowes et a]_.  (16) have found high levels of DDE and PCB in avian
eggs, with PCB reaching egg concentrations of 300 ppm wet weight, and 3700 ppm in
lipid fraction.  These occurrences were correlated with embryonic death and reduced
hatchability.
     Also, PCB has been shown to adversely affect reproduction of fish and certain
invertebrates.  In continuous flow bioassays, exposure to 1.3 ppm Aroclor 1254
for three weeks produced 50% reproductive impairment in cultures of Daphnia magna
(18), and a concentration of 0.32 ppb reduced survival  of early fry of the sheeps-
head minnow to 62%, compared with 89% for controls (3).  Nebeker et_ al_. (5)
recently investigated the effects of several PCB compounds on survival and
reproduction of the fathead minnow.  Aroclor 1254 at 4.6 ppb produced 100%
mortality of eggs, and 0.52 ppb resulted in 59-67% hatchability, compared to
71-76% in control populations.  Early fry and embryos were the most sensitive
stages in this chronic life cycle study.  Jensen et^ a]_. (6) reported that PCB
residues of 0.4-1.9 ppm in salmon eggs resulted in mortality ranging from 16-100%.
As the accumulation of PCB in fish eggs and tissues may be 75,000-200,000 times
the concentration found in water (1, 19), environmental levels as low as 2-20 parts
per trillion may inhibit egg hatchability in salmonid fishes.
     Though generally less toxic than PCB compounds, DDT is known to concentrate
in fish eggs and sperm, affecting hatchability and survival of fry (1, 7-9,  11-13).
Egg concentrations of 0.4 to 4.75 ppm or more produce high levels of embryonic
mortality in trout and salmon (1, 8, 9), and treatment of early  salmon embryos
with 50-100 ppb DDT retards behavioral development and impairs balance  (1.2).

-------
                                       - 2 -
Furthermore, the exposure of adult flounder to DDT at a sublethal concentration
of 2 ppb reportedly produces appreciable frequencies of anomalies among resulting
offspring  (11).
     Various other chlorinated hydrocarbons, including 2,4-D, dieldrin and
endrin are known to produce mortality of fish eggs and fry (10, 11, 20, 21).
In static tests with bluegill, Hiltibran (10) proposed a threshold for develop-
mental stages of approximately 2 ppm 2,4-D, and in chronic bioassays on the
sailfin molly, 0.75 ppb dieldrin was found to reduce growth rate and reproduction
(22).  Working with endrin, Johnson (23) reported sublethal exposure to adult
fish which resulted in egg concentrations sufficient to produce mortality of
developing fry.  Though many organic toxicants remain to be investigated, it
is evident that animal reproduction is one of the principal target sites of
chlorinated hydrocarbons and numerous other organic pollutants.
     Numerous inorganic toxicants also exert adverse effects on animal repro-
duction, particularly aquatic species.  Eggs, embryos and/or early juvenile
stages of fish are substantially more susceptible than adults to such metals as
cadmium, copper, mercury and zinc (24-30).  For example, continuous flow treat-
ment of rainbow trout eggs with 0.1 ppb inorganic mercury produced 100% embryonic
mortality  in 10-14 days (39).  In the same investigation, trout and channel cat-
fish embryos treated for 5 days at 0.1-3.0 ppb mercury were found to accumulate
tissue mercury at 500-2000 times the exposure levels.  In addition, frog and
chick embryos are up to 1000-10,000 times more sensitive to mercury than are
adult stages (24, 31-34).
     Bioassays with boron compounds provide further evidence that developmental
stages are appreciably more sensitive to environmental toxicants than are adult
organisms.  Working with the adult mosquito fish (Gambusia affinis). Wall en et al.
(35) reported 96-hr TL  values of 3600 and 5600 mg/1 for sodium borate and boric
acid, respectively.  Using the figure given for boric acid, this amounts to an
approximate dosage of 980 ppm boron.  Turnbull et. al_. (36) determined a 24-hr
TL  of 15,000 mg/1 for bluegill treated with boron triflouride administered at
20° C in Philadelphia tap water, and a 48-hr LDgo of 339 ppm boron has been
reported for 15-month old rainbow trout (37, 38).  In addition, Sprague (37) has
given safe limits*of 30 ppm and 33 ppm for largemouth bass and bluegill, respectively.

-------
                                       -  3  -
By comparison, low concentrations  of  boron  produce high frequencies of mortality
and teratogenesis in populations of fish, amphibian and avian embryos (40-45).
Using continuous flow treatment from  fertilization through 4 days posthatching,
we obtained boron threshold  (LC1)  values  of 0.001-0.1  ppm, 0.2-1.4 ppm and 0.2-
5.5 ppm for developmental  stages of the rainbow trout, goldfish, and channel
catfish treated with boric acid or borax  at water hardness levels of 50-200 ppm
CaC03 (45).  Depending on  test conditions,  boron LC5Q  values for developmental
stages ranged from 27-100  ppm for  rainbow trout, 46-75 ppm for goldfish, and 22-155
ppm for catfish.  Concerning avian species, which share a number of developmental
characteristics with piscine forms (.§_• 3.., megalecithal eggs, meroblastic cleavage,
primitive streak gastrulation), embryonic stages also  are impaired by low dosages
of boron compounds (43-45).   Combining  frequencies of  embryonic mortality and
teratogenesis in chick embryos treated  with boric acid and borax, we obtained
boron threshold and LC5Q values of 0.01 ppm and 0.5-1.0 ppm, respectively.
In contrast to the high boron sensitivity of  chick embryos, laying hens have
been found to tolerate a daily ration containing 0.5%  boric acid  (875 ppm boron).
Though egg laying ceased after 6  days of  exposure, normal egg  production resumed
within 2 weeks after treatment was discontinued  (46).
     Operating upon the premise that  environmental quality  standards for trace
contaminants should be established at levels  which are safe for  the most suscep-
tible stages in the life cycles of living organisms,  consistent  with  the  recom-
mendations of the NTAC, NAS-NAE  Committee on  Water Quality  Criteria,  and others
(1, 31, 47-50), we contend that  sensitive developmental  stages should  be  included
among the test organisms used for the bioassay analysis of  environmental  pollutants.
     Under support from the Department  of Interior  (Office  of Water  Research and
Technology), Environmental Protection Agency (Office of Toxic Substances)  and
the National Science Foundation  (RANN), we  have developed a series of bioassay
and bioindicator procedures for use in  evaluating the effects of environmental
toxicants on eggs, embryos and early juvenile stages of fish, amphibian and avian
species.  These test systems include a  yolk sac injection technique for the chick
embryos (33, 34), as well  as static rapid-scan (24,  31, 51),  continuous flow,
and full life-cycle bioassays for aquatic vertebrates (39).  Attention here will
be restricted primarily to a continuous flow procedure for use with developmental
and early juvenile stages of fish and  amphibians, where exposure is maintained
continuously from fertilization through 4-7 days posthatching.  Resulting dose/

-------
                                       - 4 -
response data may be used to define tolerances of sensitive life cycle stages
(£.£., mortality, embryonic anomalies, behavioral impairments) or to screen
compounds for teratogenic properties.

        ADVANTAGES OF  FISH AND AMPHIBIAN EMBRYOS AS BIOASSAY TEST ORGANISMS
     Developmental stages present a broad spectrum of target sites for the toxic
action(s) of trace contaminants, including the biochemical and physiological
mechanisms associated  with fertilization, genie action, cell proliferation and
growth, cellular differentiation, basic metabolism and systemic functions, as
well as the hatching process and the  initial accommodation to a free-living
existence.  As  a consequence, bioassay screening with developmental stages is
unlikely to produce  "false negative"  results, providing exposure to selected
toxicants is maintained  continuously  from fertilization through 4-7 days
posthatching.
     Fish and amphibian  developmental stages also display high levels of sensitivity
to environmental contaminants.  Concerning more toxic elements or compounds (e..g_.,
Hg, Cd, chlorinated hydrocarbons), developmental stages of trout or other
sensitive species usually exhibit irreversible test responses, including mortality,
teratogenesis or locomotor impairment, at ppb to ppt exposure levels.  The
sensitivity of  such bioassays often exceeds analytical detection limits.  Less
toxic substances (£.£.,  boron compounds) generally produce test responses at
ppm to ppb concentrations.  With respect to metallic toxicants (e_.g_., As, Hg,
Pb, Zn), we usually detect mortality  and/or teratogenesis of piscine developmental
stages at exposure levels below those which initiate avoidance or other behavioral
responses in adult fish  (39, 45, 52-54).  As they exhibit both high sensitivity
and clearly detectable test responses, developmental stages are especially
suitable for short-term  bioassay studies.  The schematic in Figure 1 indicates a
possible means  of using  aquatic embryos and larvae for bioassay screening purposes.
     Piscine developmental stages also possess a number of other advantages as
test organisms.  They are less subject than adult fish to physiological or
behavioral  variables induced by crowding or other test conditions.  Also, they
require no feeding and excrete minimal waste products, exerting far less burden
on culture water than adult organisms.  Test populations of 100-200 fish eggs can

-------
                                                    FIGURE 1

                  AQUATIC EMBRYOS AND LARVAE AS SENSITIVE, BROAD SPECTRUM TEST ORGANISMS FOR

                                BIOASSAY SCREENING OF ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTANTS
                                                TEST MATERIALS
MANUFACTURER
   NO GO
Excessive
  Risk
FISH & AMPHIBIAN EMBRYOS,  JUVENILES
  1. Rapid scan static bioassays
  2. Continuous flow bioassays
     (Toxicity, Teratogenesis)
      Minimal
       Risk
MANUFACTURER
     GO
                                                 Probable Risk
                     Appeal
                 Excessive Risk
                                                FURTHER TESTING
                                               WITH OTHER SYSTEMS
                          I
                          BIOLOGICAL IMPACT
                          1. Life cycle bioassays
                          2. Bioaccumulation
                          3. Biomagnification
                          4. Biodegradation
                          5. Environmental half
                             life, etc.
                        I
                                                            Periodic Review
                                                                                                                    t
                                                                                                                    en
Use, Possible Regulations
                                          HEALTH EFFECTS (MAMMALS)
                                          1.  Acute toxicity
                                          2.  Chronic toxicity
                                          3.  Carcinogenesis
                                          4.  Teratogenesis
                                          5.  Mutagenesis
                                          6.  Pharmacodynamics

-------
                                        - 6 -
 be maintained in a compact, closed culture system, providing better control
 of exposure level and mixing pattern of the toxicant, and more precise regulation
 of other test variables (e_.g_., pH, NH3, 02, water hardness, flow rate).   This
 is particularly important in testing compounds of low solubility or high volatility,
 which are difficult to stabilize in open fish tank cultures.  As generous samples
 of fish eggs can be maintained under continuous flow conditions in culture
 chambers of 0.5-1.0 liter capacity, it becomes feasible to use synthetic or
 reconstituted culture water.  This eliminates significant problems with back-
 ground contamination found in many sources of natural water (e..(j.., heavy metals,
 chloramines, phthalates, chlorinated hydrocarbons), and allows formulation
 of desired water quality parameters (e..c[., pH, total alkalinity, water hardness).
      In egg hatchability tests, the use of synthetic culture water and the omission
 of feeding preclude the two major sources of background contamination which plague
 bioassays with adult fish.  For example, in performing chronic bioassays with
 0.1-1.0 ppb cadmium and mercury, one of our principal problems has been to secure
 contaminant-free fish food.  We have analyzed numerous lots of commercial food
 which contained 10,000-20,000 ppb lead, 500-700 ppb cadmium, 20-30 ppb mercury,
 and appreciable levels of other metallic and organic toxicants.
      In recent studies with mercury and cadmium, we have found threshold values
 obtained with trout egg cultures equal or approximate to those determined in
 chronic life cycle bioassays (39).  Also, in an evaluation of 11 Central Kentucky
 streams and rivers, egg hatchability indices for fish and amphibian species
 correlated closely with independent ecological indicators of water quality (51;  Table 19)
 In particular, reductions in egg hatchability closely paralleled decreases in
 density and diversity of piscine populations.  The above findings further emphasized
 the value of the egg culture technique for the initial screening and characteri-
 zation of environmental toxicants.  Due to their simplicity of design and economy
 of maintenance, continuous flow bioassays on egg cultures may be performed in
 many laboratories which lack adequate space, facilities or water supply necessary
 for maintaining and testing populations of adult fish.

                                  BIOASSAY PROCEDURES
     Bioassay system.  Our present continuous flow bioassay system is illustrated
in Figures 2 and 3*   Fish eggs are cultured through 4-7 days posthatching in pyrex

-------
                                             FIGURE 2
              DIRECTION OF FLOW
               CULTURE CHAMBER
                                                                             FLOW
                                                                            METER
                                                                                        CULTURE
                                                                                        MEDIUM
                                          PERISTALTIC
                                             PUMP
MIXING CHAMBER
                                                                             FLOW
                                                                            METER
         CONTINUOUS  FLOW  BIOASSAY SYSTEM
                                            SYRINGE
                                              PUMP
                                                                                       TOXICANT
Peristaltic pump delivers culture water to mixing chamber at a prescribed flow rate.
Toxicant is administered to the mixing chamber by graduated flow from a syringe pump,
providing toxicant/culture water mixing ratios down to 1:1000 or less.  The final
mixture, agitated with a teflon-coated stirring bar, is pumped through the egg culture
chamber under positive pressure.  Mixing baffles in the culture chamber facilitate
uniform flow.  High resolution liquid flow meters are used to determine flow rates
from syringe and peristaltic pumps.

-------
                                         -  8 -
 chambers through which test water is perfused  at a prescribed flow rate.  The
 toxicant is administered to a mixing chamber situated  ahead  of  each culture
 dish,  using graduated flow from a syringe  pump.   Synthetic culture water is
 delivered to the mixing chamber by regulated flow from a  peristaltic pump.
 Flow rates from both syringe and peristaltic pumps are monitored by liquid
 flow meters (Figure 3).  Flow rates up to  2000 ml/hr or more are obtainable for
 300-500 ml culture chambers, and syringe/peristaltic pump mixing ratios down
 to 1:1000 or 1:10,000 can be maintained with accuracy.  Syringe and peristaltic
 pumps  are provided with calibrated, continuously variable speed controls.  The
 concentration of toxicant delivered to the mixing chamber is regulated by
 adjusting the mixing ratio from the pumping units and/or  by  varying the concen-
 tration of toxicant delivered from the syringe pump.   For example, a toxicant
 at 0.1  ppm can be delivered from the syringe pump to a mixing chamber at 0.3
 ml/hr,  and diluted to a final test concentration of 0.1 ppb  by  culture water
 metered through the peristaltic pump at 300 ml/hr.   Solutions from the two
 channels are mixed with a teflon-coated magnetic stirring bar,  and delivered to
 the culture chamber under positive pressure.   Culture  chambers  are provided
 with mixing baffles to insure uniform circulation of culture medium.
     We normally maintain cultures in banks of 6 to 8, with  each bank involving
 a  single syringe/peristaltic pump combination  (Figure  3).  Using syringes selected
 for equal  stroke volume, and fitting the peristaltic pump channels with tubing
 of matched diameters, highly consistent performance is obtained.  Two control
 populations are maintained in each culture bank.   Presently, we are using Brinkmann
 (model  131900)  and Gilson (model  HP8)  multichannel  peristaltic  pumps and Sage
 syringe pumps  (model  355).   The latter are fitted with modified syringe holders
 (Figure 3.3), and operated using  10 ml  double-ground,  glass  syringes.  Tuberculin
 1  ml or micro!iter syringes may be used for toxicant delivery when mixing ratios
 above 1:1000 prove necessary.
     We have used methylene blue  dye to check  the accuracy of a 1:1000 syringe/
 peristaltic pump  mixing  ratio,  and to  allow visual  inspection of mixing and flow
 patterns through  the  culture system.   Results  are summarized in Table 1.  Also,
 the reproducibility of  flow rates, dilution ratios  and  exposure levels for several
 boron bioassays  is  treated  in Table 2.   Accuracy of flow  rates  from syringe and
 peristaltic pumps*is  given  in Table 5.   We have  used the  above  system extensively
for bioassay measurements on boron compounds and  on numerous metallic toxicants, using
treatment levels  down to  0.1 ppb.   Monitoring  of culture water  for toxicant levels

-------
                                      - 9 -
                                     TABLE 1


                     PERFORMANCE OF THE CONTINUOUS FLOW SYSTEM


    Reproducebility of 1:1000 Mixing  Ratio  for  an Aqueous Solution  of Methylene
  Blue Dye (1000 ug/ml)  Delivered  at  0.3 ml/hr  by a Sage Syringe Pump to  Culture  ,
Chambers Receiving 300 ml/hr of Culture Water Provided by Gil son Peristaltic  Pump
          CULTURE                         ACTUAL  DYE CONCENTRATION2'3>4
        CHAMBER NO.                                  (ug/ml)


            1                                        1.00 ±0.03

            2                                       0.98 ±0.03

            3                                       0.99 ±0.03

            4                                       1.00 ±0.01

            5                                       0.99 ±0.03

            6                                       0.96 ±0.02


 The pumping rates stated above were  set to  give a final,  theoretical  dye concentra-
 tion of 1 ug/ml culture water.   Dye  concentrations were determined spectrophoto-
 metrically (Gary model  17 recording  spectrophotometer).
2
 Each concentration given as the mean value  ±  standard  error for 20 measurements
 taken at regular intervals over a seven day period of  continuous operation.
3
 A single Sage syringe pump (model 355)  was  used to operate all  six syringes, and
 one multichannel Gil son peristaltic  pump (model HP8) provided  6 separate supply
 lines for culture water.
4
 Sections of tygon tubing used for the different peristaltic pump channels were
 selected for matching diameters.  Six double  ground, 10 cc syringes were mounted
 on the syringe pump,  using a modified syringe holder.

-------
                                                         TABLE  2
                    SYRINGE  PUMP (BORON)  AND PERISTALTIC PUMP  (CULTURE  WATER)  FLOW  RATES WITH  RESULTING
                       DILUTION RATIOS OBTAINED IN TREATMENT OF TROUT EMBRYOS  AT  1  AND  10  PPB  BORONl
TROUT
COMPOUND/HARDNESS
BORIC ACID
50 ppm CaC03
200 ppm CaC03
BORAX
50 ppm CaC03
200 ppm CaCO,
3
BIOASSAYS
NOMINAL BORON
LEVEL (yg/1)
1.0
10.0
1.0
10.0
1.0
10.0
1.0
10.0

FLOW
(pl/hr)
330 ± 3
330 ± 3
318 ± 7
306 ± 1
318 ± 4
325 ± 3
320 ± 1
320 ± 1
SYRINGE PUMP
(BORON)
BORON (uq/1)
THEORETICAL ACTUAL
600 594 ± 4
6000 6050 ± 90
600 614 ± 4
6000 6130 ± 60
600 588 ± 11
6000 5930 ± 80
600 594 ± 4
6000 5870 ± 70
PERISTALTIC PUMP
CCULTURE WATER)
FLOW BORON
(ml/hr) DILUTION RATIO
198 ± 2.4
198 ± 4.8
183 ± 4.0
192 ± 3.7
188 ± 2.9
190 ± 2.8
194 ± 1.9
197 ± 1.3
600 ± 7
600 ± 15
575 ± 13
627 ± 8
591 ± 14
585 ± 11
606 ± 7
616 ± 5
FINAL
BORON
CONCENTRATION^
(yg/D
0.99
10.08
1.07
9.78
0.99
10.14
0.98
9.53
 Mean values ± standard errors, where n was 10 for syringe pump boron analyses  and  20 for  all other determinations.
2
 Final  boron concentration delivered to the culture chamber was determined  as actual syringe pump boron
 concentration/boron dilution ratio.  The latter was calculated as  peristaltic  pump flow rate/syringe pump
 flow rate.

-------
                                       -  11  -
has shown good reproducibility (Tables  2,  6-8).
     Modifications of present bioassay  system.   The  above  system  may be  modified
in several important respects in order  to  accommodate  testing  of  organic chemicals
of low solubility or high volatility.
     A closed culture chamber may be used  to eliminate the air/water interface,
minimizing volatility as a test variable.   Such  culture chambers  may be  constructed
from 3" pyrex pipe provided with clamp-locking,  teflon 0-ring  joints.  Using
standard glass blowing techniques, the  glass pipe  should be cut and  sealed  to
give a capacity of 0.5 liter, and to position  the  0-ring-sealed joint as close
as possible to the "top" of the culture dish.  Access  to the test organisms
may be obtained by opening the watertight  joint  and  removing the  chamber cover.
An outlet port should be annealed to the  cover,  with an inlet  port positioned
near the bottom of the chamber.  The culture chamber may be divided  by a teflon
screen, positioned horizontally at mid-depth.  Test  eggs and embryos should be
maintained above the screen, while a glass or  teflon-coated, magnetic stirring
bar may be used below the screen to provide moderate agitation of the culture  water.
     The second principal modification  concerns  the  mixing chamber shown in
Figure 2.  This unit should be equipped with a high  capacity variable speed
stirring mechanism, suitable to provide a uniform  suspension of insoluble toxicant
in culture water, and flow rate through the culture  system should be adjusted  to
minimize partitioning of the toxicant in the egg chamber.   Some experimentation
may be required to develop an adequate  mixing  technique which  will fulfill  bioassay
requirements,without excessive foaming  or other  conditions unsuitable to the
design of the continuous flow procedure.   Mechanical mixing, if properly adapted
to the system, may eliminate the need for carrier solvents or  emulsifiers which
introduce undesirable test variables.  We are now in the process of testing and
perfecting the above culture modifications, performing bioassays with a series of
organic toxicants which vary in solubility and volatility.
     Culture water.  We have given considerable attention to the development of
a synthetic culture water suitable for bioassays.   Synthetic water  provides more
stable test conditions  than  natural water,  as the latter  is subject to  substantial
geographic and seasonal fluctuations in composition (e_.£.,  total dissolved solids,
hardness, pH).  Also, problems with background contaminants are minimized  when
prepared water is used  for culture purposes.  However,  it  is  essential  to  use a
formulation for synthetic water which gives chemical  and  physical characteristics
similar  to natural water.

-------
                                       - 12 -
     In the event that an ample supply of natural water of high quality is  not
available, the synthetic water described below may be used.  This formulation has
been used extensively during the past 2 years, and is known to give toxicity
responses with metals (e_.g_., Cd, Cu, Hg, Zn) which are closely comparable to
results obtained using natural water of similar composition.   Also, we have
performed hatchability tests with 4 species of fish and 5 species of amphibians,
comparing our synthetic culture water to natural water from Steele's Run, a
local stream  (limestone bed) which supports a healthy aquatic ecosystem.
Frequencies of hatchability were indistinguishable for the two water sources,
averaging 92% for fish and 96% for amphibians.
     Synthetic culture water should be prepared from distilled, double deionized
water, having a conductivity of 0.25 pmhos or less.  Routine monitoring should
be conducted for background contaminants.  Calcium, magnesium, sodium and potassium
salts should be added as given in Table 3.  This basic stock is prepared to give
a water hardness level of 200 ppm CaCOg and a pH of 7.5-8.0.   Different levels
of hardness may be achieved by dilution of the basic stock water, according to
directions given in Appendix II.  Should regulation of pH prove necessary,  adjust-
ments may be made by altering the concentration of sodium bicarbonate and/or by
addition of dilute sulfuric acid or sodium hydroxide (55, 63).
     This basic stock solution (Table 3) has essentially the same pH, conductivity
and water hardness as given for Mount's test water, which consisted of a mixture
of natural spring water (emerging from limestone strata) and carbon-filtered,
deionized tap water (55).  Also, the content of calcium, magnesium and potassium
is  in close agreement.  The concentrations of cations and anions listed in Table
3 fall  within ranges published for freshwater resources in Arizona (56), Kentucky
(57), and other areas of the U.S. (58).  Total chloride content, total dissolved
solids, and the concentration of sodium plus potassium are well under maximum
levels of 170 mg/1, 400 mg/1 and 85 mg/1, observed in 95% of U.S. waters found to
support good, mixed fish fauna (59).  Also, specific conductivity of 300 pmhos
falls within the range of 150-500 recommended for fish propagation (58), and is
typical  of values recorded for freshwater resources in Kentucky (57).  In addition,
osmolarity is well  within the maximum limit of 50 mOsm/Kg water suggested for
freshwaters in the U.S. (47).  Total alkalinity exceeds the minimum recommended
level  of 20 mg/1  CaC03, and closely approaches the range cited as optimum to
support a diversified aquatic life (47, 58).  As maintained in the culture  system

-------
                               - 13 -
                               TABLE 3
                        SYNTHETIC CULTURE WATER
DISSOLVED SALTSl (mg/1 )
CaCl2
MgS04'7H20
NaHC03
KC1
150
150
100
5
CHEMICAL COMPOSITION (mg/1)
Ca
Mg
Na
K
Cl
HC03
so,
Total dissolved solids
54.2
14.8
27.4
2.6
98.2
72.6
58.5
328.3
PHYSICOCHEMICAL CHARACTERISTICS2
Hardness (as mg/1 CaC03)
Total alkalinity (as mg/1 CaC03)
Conductivity (vmhos/cm)
Osmolarity (mOsm/Kg H20)
PH
200.0
82.0
300.0
12.0
7.9
'Prepared in distilled,  deionized  water  (specific  conductivity
 of 0.2 ymhos).

Measurements made at 22° C.   Above  figures  represent  mean
 values for six  measurements.

-------
                                        -  14 -
 described herein (continuous  aeration), the dissolved  oxygen level is approxi-
 mately 10 mg/1  at the culture temperature used  for  trout embryos  (13° C).  A
 minimum of 7 mg/1  has been recommended  for trout  and salmon spawning waters
 (47).   The pH of our culture  medium also  is well  within the range found in
 natural  waters.   Bass Becking et_ al_.  (60) observed  a pH range of 6-8 for 85% of
 347  freshwater rivers and lakes  surveyed, and pH  values of 6.5-8.5 generally
 are  found in the more productive freshwater resources  in the U.S. (47).
      Test conditions and  monitoring procedures.   In the initial characterization
 of an environmental  toxicant, water quality parameters discussed above (Table
 3) should be held  constant, while the concentration of the toxicant is varied
 to determine dose/response data.   Using the bioassay system as recommended, the
 commonphysicochemical parameters of the test water  should fall within ranges
 prevailing for most  U.S.  freshwaters, facilitating  extrapolations from test
 data.   After initial  dose/response studies are  completed for a selected toxicant,
 certain  water quality variables  (e_-g_.,  pH, hardness, temperature) may be manipulated
 independently to determine whether they affect  test responses exerted by the
 toxicant.
      In  initial  investigations,  if only one water hardness level is to be selected,
 we recommend using 100 or 200 ppm CaCOo,  with a pH  of  7.5-8.0 (Table 3; Appendix II).
 Culture  water should  be given continuous  aeration (filtered air) supplied either
 to the mixing chamber or  to the  reservoir serving the  peristaltic pump (Figure 2).
 The  latter is advised when more  volatile  toxicants  are used.  Temperature should
 be maintained within  the  range considered optimum for  development of the selected
 animal test  species,  preferably  holding overall fluctuations to 1° C.  It should be
 noted  that the  rate  of embryonic development for  fish  and amphibians will vary
 with temperature.  Significant increases  in  temperature will shorten hatching
 time,  providing  the tolerance limit of  the species  is  not exceeded.   Concerning
 test species  which we have used most  frequently in  the bioassay system described
 above, average hatching times  with  preferred temperatures are 24 days for rainbow
 trout  (13° C), 6 days  for  channel  catfish (22° C),  5 days for goldfish (19° C),
 4 days for black bass  (18° C)  and  6-3.5 days for  the leopard frog (18-25° C).
 Data for additional species are given in  Table 10.
     Bioassay cultures preferably  should  be maintained in walk-in, temperature
regulated environmental rooms.  All cultures must be monitored once or twice

-------
                                       - 15 -
daily for temperature,  dissolved  oxygen, ammonia, water hardness and pH.  For
these measurements we use a  YSI tele-thermometer with thermocouple, YSI oxygen
meter (model  51 A), Orion  ammonia  and water hardness electrodes, and a Corning
digital  pH meter (model  110, with expanded millivolt scale).  The accuracy with
which general  water parameters may be  regulated within this test system is
illustrated in Table 4,  which summarizes results for a series of 18 bioassays
conducted with boron compounds at water hardness levels of 50 and 200 ppm CaCO^
and pH levels varying from 7.5-8.5.
     Particular attention must be given to trout embryos, especially during the
"green stage."  Harmful  exposure  to artificial light should be precluded (61,
62) and it is advisable to maintain cultures under semi-sterile conditions to
minimize occurrences of soft egg  disease or fungus.  Prior to each use, culture
rooms are disinfected and irradiated with UV for 12 hours, and culture dishes and
other glassware are chemically cleansed and autoclaved.  Culture rooms may be
maintained under positive pressure to  minimize contamination.  In the event of
fungus or soft egg disease,  periodic treatment may be given with formaldehyde
(1/1000 for 10 minutes),  acriflavine  (1/2000 for 20 minutes), or other procedures
given in Appendix II.
     Flow rates from peristaltic  and syringe pumps must be monitored at least
twice daily, and the toxicant exposure level should be analyzed at regular,
12-24-hr intervals, as discussed  below (Monitoring of Toxicant).  Test organisms
must be examined daily to gauge  extent and  frequency of development, and to  remove
dead specimens.  Control  eggs should be cultured simultaneously with experimentals
and under identical conditions,  except for  the omission of the selected toxicant.
     In bioassays with metallic  toxicants,  we  generally have  maintained flow rates
at 200, 300 and 600 ml/hr, giving turnover  times for  300  ml  cultures of  1.5,  1.0  and
0.5 hours, respectively.   As seen in Table  11, we  have  not  found  flow  rate to
constitute a substantial  test variable, providing  it  is  sufficiently  high  to prevent
deterioration of culture water.   For water  soluble toxicants  of  low volatility,
we recommend a flow rate which will provide a  culture turnover time of 0.5-1.0 hour.
However, flow rate requirements  may differ  significantly  for certain  organic
toxicants.  Accordingly, some experimentation may be required to determine effects
of flow rate on selected organics.  In particular, higher flow rates  may be
required to prevent hydrophobic organics from partitioning in the culture chambers.
     Monitoring of toxicant.  It is essential  that actual exposure levels be

-------
                                      - 16 -
determined  by  direct  chemical analysis of culture water.  Each culture,
including controls, should  be analyzed daily, using duplicate or triplicate
samples, and mean  exposure  ± standard error should be determined for the
bioassay treatment period.  The continuous flow test system should be operated
24-72  hours prior  to  the  introduction of test organisms.  During this period,
toxicant exposure  levels  and other test parameters should be stabilized.
     Particular  care  should be given to toxicant levels during the first 24
hours  following  initiation  of the egg cultures.  When toxicants of high
bioaccumulation  potential are administered at ppb levels, the exposure concen-
tration may drop sharply  when eggs are first added to the test system, and
adjustments in the toxicant injection rate may be required.
     The method  of chemical analysis to be used for culture monitoring should be
chosen carefully,  considering detection limits, reproducibility, sample volume
requirements,  and  operational efficiency.  Simultaneous operation of 20-30
bioassay units will impose  a considerable burden on analytical facilities.
However, culture assays are essential on a daily basis, to confirm exposure
levels and  to  provide necessary data for adjustments in the test systems.
Generally,  exposure levels  can be held to an overall variation of 5-10%.
Proficiency in analytical techniques should be achieved before bioassay tests
are undertaken,  and alternative procedures should be used to confirm the reliability
of the chosen  monitoring  method.
     Considering the  vast array of environmental toxicants which may require
screening,  the bioassay technician may have recourse to a wide variety of
analytical  procedures.  Consultation with analytical chemists may help insure
proper choice  and  execution of detection methods.  Two forms of instrumentation
which  we have  used extensively in bioassay studies include atomic absorption
spectrophotometry  and gas chromatography.  The former provides reliable
detection for  a  wide  range  of elements which may appear as trace contaminants
in water used  for  toxicological studies.  In a present investigation on coal
toxicology, a  Perkin-Elmer  model 503 AAS unit, equipped for digital readout
and data recording, is being used to monitor inorganic trace elements.  When
operated with  a  cold-vapor  kit or graphite furnace, low detection limits are
achievable  for mercury, cadmium and many other elements (Table 12).
     In the bioassay evaluation of a series of organic toxicants, we are

-------
                                       -  17 -
using gas chromatography (Packard 7400 with data  integrator)  as  the principal
monitoring technique.   Table 13 gives  detection limits  and recommended  GC
procedures for  several  classes of organics.
     Backup analyses for organic compounds  are performed  by GC-mass spectroscopy
(Finnigan model  3300 F).   The latter is particularly useful for  monitoring
control and experimental  test water for background  contaminants.
     Test concentrations and exposure  time. Depending  upon the  degree  of
anticipated toxicity, solubility and analytical detection limits,  bioassay
tests generally are initiated at 10-100 parts per million (10-100  mg/1)
toxicant and continued at 10-fold dilutions down  to 0.1-1.0 part per billion
(0.1-1.0 yg/1).   If necessary, this range of test concentrations may be extended
to provide adequate delineation of threshold and  LC50 values,  or to reflect
levels of toxicants reported for natural  water resources.   Usually, 5 to 6
test concentrations are sufficient for the  initial  characterization of  a selected
toxicant.  It is often desirable to repeat  the exposure series for two  or more
water hardness levels (.§_.£., 50 and 200 ppm CaCOo).
     Generally, toxicants should be administered  continuously from fertilization
through 4-7 days posthatching.  At 4 days posthatching, using recommended  temper-
atures, exposure periods will approximate 28, 10, 9 and 8 days for trout,  catfish,
goldfish and bass, respectively.  In bioassays with fish eggs, it  appears  that
certain environmental contaminants (e..£., Hg, B)  are more toxic  to early embryos,
while other pollutants (e..c|_., Cu, Zn,  PCB)  are more lethal to late embryonic stages
and/or early fry (3, 5, 24-30, 45).  Exposure times noted above  cover the  full
range of embryonic events, as well as hatching and  the  sensitive early  juvenile
period, and are advisable to adequately evaluate  the effects  of environmental
toxicants on the development and growth of  immature piscine stages.  However,
shorter exposure periods may be used for  initial  rapid-screening procedures.
     Sample size and test responses.  Control  eggs  should be cultured simul-
taneously with experimental and under identical  conditions, except for the
omission of the selected toxicant.  With  proper daily maintenance, viable,
fertilized eggs should give  hatching frequencies in control  populations of 85%
or more (e..£., Table 14).  In the event control  survival drops below 75%,
attention should be given to the source of eggs and  sperm, as well as  to culture
conditions (Appendix II).
     A sample size of 100-150 eggs (2-3 replicates)  is recommended for  both

-------
                                        - 18 -
 experimental  and control  cultures.   Quantification  of  test  responses generally
 should be limited primarily to lethality, teratogenesis  and locomotor impairment,
 expressed in each case as frequency among experimental populations/frequency in
 controls.   Dose/response  data should be plotted for continuous  exposure from
 fertilization through hatching and  4 days posthatching (e..£., Figures 4, 5;
 Table 8).   Threshold and  LC5Q values should be expressed for individual and
 combined test responses for embryonic and postembryonic  stages,  as well as for
 the entire exposure period from fertilization  to 4-7 days posthatching (£.5..,
 Tables 8,  9).   Log-probit analysis  or other statistical  procedures should be
 used to determine significance of test responses (.e.cj..,  Table 9).
      Observations on teratogenesis  may be restricted to  debilitating anomalies
 affecting  those animals which survive the hatching  process.  Examples of normal
 and teratogenic trout alevins are given in Plates I-VI of Appendix III.  In the
 analysis of teratogenic defects, particular attention  should be given to the
 skeletal  system, especially the vertebral  column.  The latter appears to be the
 single most reliable indicator of teratogenic  action in  fish.   This is apparent
 in  Table 15,  where we have summarized frequencies of boron-induced anomalies
 for several  aquatic species.   As seen in Plates 11-IV, development of the vertebral
 column,  probably sclerotomial  differentiation,  also is affected  by a number of
 metallic toxicants (e..5_., Cd,  Hg).   Rainbow trout and  the channel catfish are
 particularly  suitable test species  for screening teratogenic compounds.  As seen
 in  Table 16,  trout embryos exhibit  especially  high  frequencies  of teratogenesis
 for a  wide range of metallic  toxicants.
      Selection  of animal  test species.   Over the past  4  years we have worked with
 approximately 20 fish and amphibian species.   Most  are adaptable for use with
 the bioassay  system described  above.   The fish  which we  have used most extensively
 include  the black bass  (Micropterus salmoides),  goldfish (Carassius auratus).
 channel  catfish (Ictalurus punctatus).  and the  rainbow trout (Salmo gairdneri).
Amphibian  species,  all  of which  are Anurans, include the red-spotted toad
 (Bufo  punctatus),  southern gray  treefrog (Hyla  chrvsocephala),  narrow-mouthed
toad  (Gastrophryne  carolinensis). squirrel  treefrog  (Hyla squirella). pig frog
 (Rana grylio) and the leopard  frog  (Rana pipi ens).  Hatching times, egg production,
seasonal availability and  possible  sources  of supply are summarized in Table 10.
Numerous other  Species also are  suitable for test purposes, including the fat-
head minnow (Pimephales promelas),  bluntnose minnow  (Pimephales  notatus). bluegill

-------
                                       -  19 -
(Lepomis macrochirus) and the zebra  fish  (Brachydanio  rerio).
     In selecting test species,  consideration  should be given  to availability,
ease of handling in the laboratory,  geographical  and ecological  distribution,
pattern of reproduction and development,  and sensitivity to  toxicants.   Sensitivity
of eggs and embryos may vary with hatching  time,  egg yolk volume, and certain
other developmental features.  For example, in rapid-scan bioassays  in  which
culture water and toxicant were renewed at  12-hr  intervals,  we observed up
to 100-fold variations in mercury tolerances of various fish and amphibian eggs
(Figure 6; Tables 17, 18).  Generally,  mercury sensitivity of  fish stages increased
with hatching time and/or egg yolk volume.   However, species sensitivity does  not
remain constant for all classes of toxicants.   Thus, for in-depth bioassay
investigations, we recommend selecting  2  to 3  test species which differ in important
developmental characteristics.  Such tests will provide a more  reliable  and
representative index to the embryopathic  effects  produced by environmental trace
contaminants.
     In comparing the sensitivity of developmental stages of different fish and
amphibian species to particular toxicants,  it  is  important to  regulate exposure
period  to cover essentially the same embryonic and post-embryonic stages.  This
is especially important as both the order and  degree of sensitivity  of different
developmental stages may vary substantially for different toxicants.  The
recommended exposure period largely encompasses all developmental processes from
fertilization through yolk sac resorption,  providing a basis for comparative
toxicological studies.  As developmental  (exposure) time may vary for different
test species, it should be treated appropriately as a  significant test variable.

-------
    - 20 -
  APPENDIX I
SUPPORTING DATA
  FIGURES 3-6





  TABLES 4-19

-------
                         - 21 -
                        FIGURE 3


             CONTINUOUS FLOW BIOASSAY  SYSTEM
3.1  Series of egg culture dishes  (A) which  receive toxicant
     and culture water from mixing chamber (B).   Culture water
     is supplied to mixing chambers by  peristaltic  pump (C).
     Liquid flow meters (D) are used to measure  flow rate.

3.2  Enlarged view of culture room showing culture  dishes (A),
     mixing chambers (B), peristaltic pumps  (C), and flow
     meters (D).  Culture dishes exhaust water into plexiglass
     drain troughs which are connected  to waste  reservoirs.

3.3  Syringe pump used to supply toxicant to mixing chamber.
     Syringe pumps are mounted on  outside culture room wall
     to avoid mechanical problems  resulting from culture room
     temperature and humidity.  Note the modified holder which
     supports six 10 ml syringes.   A modified syringe mounting
     bracket is shown inverted on  the syringe drive carriage
     (arrow).

-------

-------
                         FIGURE 4
  100  •'    -
   80
   60
§
   40
   20
       0-01
                                   N
                                         ro
                                         ro
0-1
I
10
100
1000
                  BORON CONCENTRATION (ppm)
           TOXICITY OF BORIC ACID TO GOLDFISH EMBRYOS

-------
                       FIGURE 5
100
 80
 60
 40
 20
        o-
Zn*+

Cd**
   0-001
   0-01
0-1
I
10
               METAL CONCENTRATION (ppm)
                                            ro
                                            CO
100
         TOXICITY OF METALS TO GOLDFISH EMBRYOS

-------
                   FIGURE 6

100
 80
 60
 40
 20
A-
o
      I
•A—2
\

            ^^
            \


                         A-GOLDFISH
                         o-CATFISH
                         •-TROUT
                         A-ALL SPECIES
                                              ro
                                              i
                                 •A—A
                                      A-
   0-001   0-01
              0-1
                  I
10
100
            Hg++ CONCENTRATION  (ppm)
TOXICITY OF INORGANIC MERCURY TO FISH EMBRYOS

-------
                           TABLE 4


TEST PARAMETERS OBSERVED DURING BIOASSAYS  WITH  BORON  COMPOUNDS
(EMBRYONIC &
TEST
SPECIES
CATFISH





BIOASSAYS
POSTEMBRYONIC STAGES)
COMPOUND/WATER HARDNESS
BORIC ACID @
50 ppm CaCOo
200 ppm CaCOo
BORAX @
50 ppm CaCOo
200 ppm CaC03
FOWLER'S TOAD BORIC ACID @


GOLDFISH





LEOPARD FROG





TROUT





50 ppm CaCOo,
200 ppm CaC03
BORIC ACID @
50 ppm CaCOo
200 ppm CaCOa
BORAX @
50 ppm CaC03
200 ppm CaCOa
BORIC ACID @
50 ppm CaCOo
200 ppm CaCOa
BORAX @
50 ppm CaCOa
200 ppm CaCOa
BORIC ACID 0
50 ppm CaCOa
200 ppm CaCOa
BORAX 0
50 ppm CaCOo
200 ppm CaCOa
OBSERVED TEST PARAMETERS (MEAN ± STANDARD ERROR)
TEMPERATURE
(°C)

25.0 ± 0.4
24.7 ± 0.6

29.4 ± 0.3
29.4 ± 0.3

23.7 ± 0.6
23.7 ± 0.6

24.8 ± 0.3
24.8 ± 0.3

27.0 ± 0.4
27.0 ± 0.4

25.0 ± 0.3
25.0 ± 0.3

25.3 ± 0.2
25.3 ± 0.2

13.7 ± 0.1
13.3 ± 0.1

14.0 ± 0.1
13.0 ± 0.1
DISSOLVED
OXYGEN (ppm)

7.3 ± 0.1
7.6 ± 0.1

6.4 ± 0.1
6.5 ± 0.1

6.8 ± 0.1
6.8 ± 0.1

7.4 ± 0.0
7.5 ± 0.0

7.5 ± 0.2
7.5 ± 0.2

7.7 ± 0.2
7.8 ± 0.2

7.7 ± 0.2
7.8 ± 0.2

9.2 ± 0.1
9.6 ± 0.1

10.1 ± 0.2
10.3 ± 0.2
WATER HARDNESS
(ppm CaC03)

51. 8 ± 2.0
212.0 ± 11.0

46.7 ± 2.3
194.7 ± 3.2

57.4 ± 4.2
207.5 ± 10.0

54.4 ± 4.2
207.5 ± 10.0

46.2 ± 1.8
194.8 ± 16.0

52.5 ± 1.4
212.3 ± 5.4

46.2 ± 4.9
203.0 ± 2.3

54.1 ± 3.5
204.0 ± 4.0

49.0 ± 1.4
191.0 ± 4.0
PH

7.5 ± 0.1
7.6 ± 0.0

8.5 ± 0.0
8.2 ± 0.1

7.6 ± 0.1
7.6 ± 0.1

7.9 ± 0.1
7.6 ± 0.1

8.3 ± 0.1
8.1 ± 0.1

7.7 ± 0.0
7.7 ± 0.0

8.3 ± 0.1
8.4 ± 0.1

7.7 ± 0.1
7.9 ± 0.1

7.9 ± 0.1
7.8 ± 0.1
FLOW RATE
(ml/hr)

194.2 ± 4.3
199.7 ± 2.7

188.8 ± 4.1
191.0 ± 1.8

185.3 ± 2.8
189.8 ± 4.6

184.6 ± 5.7
180.4 ± 5.4

208.0 ± 4.5
224.2 ± 3.0

193.4 ± 2.3
189.2 ± 4.4

180.0 ± 4.1
195.6 ± 4.1

195.0 ± 1.2
189.4 ± 2.1

190.4 ± 2.9
189.4 ± 2.1
                                                                                             ro
                                                                                             01

-------
- 26 -
TABLE 5
TABLE 5A. ANALYSIS OF FLOW RATES FOR ,
BRINKMAN PERISTALTIC PUMP (MODEL 131900)1
Flow Rate
(ml/hr)
50
100
150
300
1
49.8*0.3
99.4*0.4
150.8*2.4
299.9*2.0
2
49.5*0.2
97.4*0.5
146.6*1.0
294.6*2.7
Channel
3
49.2*0.1
98.6to.3
150.2*0.8
296.1*2.0
Number^
4
50.0*0.6
101.5*0.4
150.9*0.9
304.6*2.0

5
50.8*0.2
101.6*0.4
149.1*1.2
302.2*2.1

6
50.1*0.2
99.7±0.3
151.4*1.2
297.7*2.3
   1  Tygon  tubing  -  1/16"  ID,  1/8"  OD.

   2  Mean *  standard error;  each  value based on 20  reolicatesover  a  7  day
     period.
                     TABLE  5B. ANALYSIS OF  FLOW RATES FOR
                     GILSON  PERISTALTIC PUMP  (MODEL HP8)1
Flow Rate
(ml/hr)
50
100
175
275
1
48.7*0.4
96.7*0.4
170.4*0.6
267.3*0.8
2
50.4*0.7
100.5*0.5
173.6*0.6
273.9*2.0
Channel
3
50.8*0.6
99.9*0.5
177.2*0.5
278.5*0.9
Number^
4
48.7*0.4
100.1*0.5
173.8*0.6
274.1*0.6

5
48.3*0.0
96.5*0.4
172.4*0.4
268.5*0.7

6
48.3*0.0
96.5*0.4
169.4*0.5
265.5*9.7
  1  Tygon tubing -  1/16" ID, 1/8" OD.

  2  Mean * standard error; each value based on 20 replicates over a 7 day
     period.

                     TABLE  5C. ANALYSIS OF DELIVERY  RATES FOR
                        SARE SYRINGE PUMP (MODEL 355)
  Flow Rate
(ml/hr X 10(
                                    Syrinoe Number^
                 1
   10.002    10.07*0.24  9.80*0.17 10.00*0.16 10.21*0.21  9.53*0.13 10.42*0.19
   30.002    31.40*0.46 31.80*0.48 32.00*0.37 31.50*0.48 31.50*0.50 32.60*0.36
   30.OO3    30.14*0.57 30.09*0.67 32.05*0.76 31.13*0.82 30.50*0.58 30.14*0.61
   60.OO3    64.00*1.24 57.11*2.20 60.38*1.31 63.79*1.24 61.67*2.16 64.00*1.15

1  Mean * standard error; each value based on 20 reolicates over  a  7 day  neriod.

2  10 ml glass syringe (sinale ground).

3  10 ml p!astickdisposable syrinoe.

-------
                                                  TABLE  6
                            CORRELATION OF  PERCENT SURVIVAL WITH EXPOSURE TIME
                FOR TROUT  EMBRYOS TREATED WITH  INORGANIC  MERCURY IN A CONTINUOUS FLOW SYSTEM
CULTURE
NUMBER

i



2


•j

% SURVIVAL

ppb Hg*2
% SURVIVAL



ppb Hg
515 SURVIVAL

ppb Hg
1
100

0.1
100



0.1
100

0.1
2
99

0.1
97



0.1
100

0.1
EXPOSURE TIME IN DAYS
3456
95

0.1
94



0.2
97

0.1
82 59 41

0.1 0.1 0.1
79 55 39



<0.1 0.1 0.1
03 57 49

<0.1 <0.1 0.1
MEAN EXPOSURE1
7 8
23 0

0.1 0.2 0.11 ± 0.01
26 0
i

"" " 	 ro
0.2 0.3 0.14 ± 0.03 ,
26 0

0.2 0.2 0.10 ± 0.03
1
Mean exposure ± standard error for the 8 day period.

-------
                                                       TABLE 7




                           EXPOSURE OF RAINBOW TROUT EMBRYOS AND ALEVINS (SALMO GAIRDNERI)


CONCENTRATION1
CADMIUM (PPB)

5.16 ± 0.44
11.52 ± 0.82
27.95 ± 1.70
50.95 ± 2.51
79.52 ± 3.97
103.20 ± 4.09
254.00 ± 7.00
TO CADMIUM IN WATER OF 100
TEST RESPONSES AT
% HATCHABILITY2

94(2)
93(3)
86(8)
76(9)
72(10)
78(23)
55(100)
PPM CaC03
HATCHING
% NORMAL

H
92
90
79
69
65
60
0
HARDNESS
(H) AND 4 DAYS
SURVIVAL3

PH
92
89
67
63
62
55
0

POSTHATCHING

(PH)
% DEAD OR TERATOGENIC

H
8
10
21
31
35
40
100

PH
8
11
33
37
38
45
100
 Concentration given as mean ± standard error as determined by atomic absorption spectrophotometry.

2
 Percent of surviving population bearing gross teratogenic defects is given parenthetically.


3Percent of initial population surviving with normal morphology.
                                                                                                                      ro
                                                                                                                      oo

-------
                                                     TABLE  8
                              EXPOSURE  OF CATFISH EMBRYOS AND  FRY  (ICTALURUS PUNCTATUS)
                              TO BORON  (BORIC  ACID)  IN  WATER OF  200  PPM CaC03 HARDNESS
                                            TEST  RESPONSES AT HATCHING  (H) AND 4 DAYS POSTHATCHIN6 (PH)
CONCENTRATION
BORON (PPM) i c, uATpHflR
NOMINAL ACTUAL1 * HATCHAB
0.01
0.05
0.50
0.75
1.00
2.50
5.00
7.50
10.00
25.00
50.00
75.00
150.00
300.00
[LITY2 % NORMAL
H
100(2) 98
100(1) 99
0.53 ± 0.02 100(2) 98
0.77 ± 0.01 100(2) 98
0.96 ± 0.01 96(3) 93
2.33 ± 0.12 99(2) 97
4.90 ± 0.07 95 t
7.40 ± 0.10 95 ^
9.43 ± 0.23 94 I
25.10 ± 0.27 90 2
48.30 ± 0.84 83 2
77.70 ± 0.54 71 4
140.00 ± 5.00 57 2
302.00 ±29.00 0
I 91
L 91
J 87
!8) 65
)0 58
\3 40
!2 44
0
SURVIVAL3
PH
98
98
94
98
86
87
82
75
65
40
28
9
2
0
% DEAD OR
H
2
1
2
2
7
3
9
9
13
35
42
60
56
100
TERATOGENIC
PH
2
2
6
2
14
13 ^
18
25
35
60
72
91
98
100
TConcentration given as mean ± standard error as determined by curcumln method.
2Percent of surviving population bearing gross teratogenlc defects is given parenthetically.
3Percent of Initial population surviving with normal morphology.

-------
                                        TABLE  9
                   LOG  PROBIT ANALYSIS OF THRESHOLD  (LC^ VALUES IN PPM
                       FOR AQUATIC  EMBRYOS EXPOSED TO BORON COMPOUNDS
                                                                    1
BORIC ACID
TEST
SPECIES
CATFISH
FOWLER'S TOAD
GOLDFISH
LEOPARD FROG
TROUT
50 ppm
H
1.0
25.0
0.6
26.0
0.1
CaC03
PH
0.5
25.0
0.6
13.0
0.1
200 ppm
H
0.3
5.0
0,2
23.0
0.001
CaC03
PH
0.2
5.0
0.2
22.0
0.001
50 ppm
H
5.5
-
1.4
6.0
0.07
BORAX
CaC03
PH
5.5
-
1.4
5.0
0.07
200 ppm
H
1.7
-
0.9
3.0
0.07
CaC03
PH
1.7
-
0.9
3.0
0.07
threshold values were calculated at hatching (H)  and 4 days  posthatching  (PH) for two
 water hardness levels (50 ppm CaC03, 200 ppm CaC03).  Grossly anomalous survivors were
 counted as lethals.
                                                                                                       to
                                                                                                       o

-------
                                                     TABLE 10



                                SPECIES SELECTED FOR USE AS EMBRYONIC BIOINDICATORS
SPECIES
Largemouth Bass
(Micropterus salmoides)
Goldfish
(Carassius auratus)
Channel Catfish
(Ictalurus punctatus)
Rainbow Trout
(Sal mo gairdneri)
Pig Frog
(Rana grylio)
Leopard Frog
(Rana pi pi ens)
Red-spotted Toad
(Bufo punctatus)
Narrow-mouthed Toad
(Gastrophryne carol inensis)
Southern Gray Treefrog
(Hyla chrysocephala)
Squirrel Treefrog
(Hyla squirella)

Developmental
Time in Days
4 (Hft)
5 (19°C)
6 (22°C)
24 (13°C)
6 (22°C)
6 (19°C)
3 (22°C)
3 (22°C)
3 (22°C)
3 (22°C)
Number of Eggs*
Per Female
10,000-15,000
15,000-25,000
10,000-15,000
6,000-8,000
6,000-10,000
2,000-4,000
2,000-4,000
1,000-3,000
100-500
80-150
Breeder's
Availability
April -June
March-July
May-August
Sept. -April
March-June
Dec. -May
April -August
May-August
May-June
May-August
Source
National Fish Hatchery
Frankfort, Kentucky
National Fish Hatchery
Frankfort, Kentucky
National Fish Hatcheries
Frankfort, Ky. and
Senacaville, Ohio
National Fish Hatchery
Wytheville, Virginia
Charles D. Sullivan
Nashville, Tennessee
Amphibian Facility,
Univ. Michigan, Ann Arbor
Charles D. Sullivan
Nashville, Tennessee
Charles D. Sullivan
Nashville, Tennessee
Charles D. Sullivan
Nashville, Tennessee
Charles D. Sullivan
Nashville, Tennessee
                                                                                                                  CO
                                                                                                                  __1


                                                                                                                  I
''Egg  production dependent upon size and maturity.

-------
                                            TABLE 11



                                    EFFECT OF FLOW  RATE ON


                         METAL TOXICITY TO CATFISH  EMBRYOS AND ALEVINS
FLOW RATE
(ml/hr)
50
125
250
400
TURNOVER RATE PERCENT SURVIVAL AT HATCHING (H)
(per hour)1 AND 4 DAYS POSTHATCHING (PH) FOR METAL CONCENTRATIONS IN PPM
Hg+2 H PH Cd*2 H PH Zn+2 H PH
0.2 0.0021 36 17 0.23 40 13 0.42 57 40
0.5 0.0027 45 23 0.25 48 22 0.50 59 38
1.0 0.0025 46 25 0.29 54 32 0.50 60 34
1.6 0.0024 43 25 0.30 50 27 0.59 61 35
Values represent fraction of a 250 ml culture chamber renewed per hour.
                                                                                                        CO
                                                                                                        ro

-------
                                   - 33 -
                                  TABLE 12
             COAL  TRACE  ELEMENTS SELECTED  FOR BIOASSAY EVALUATIONS
Trace
El ement
Al umi num
Antimony
Arsenic
Cadmium
Cobalt
Chromium
Copper
Germanium
Lanthanum
Lead
Manganese
Mercury

(Al)
(Sb)
(As)
(Cd)
(Co)
(Cr)
(Cu)
(Ge)
(La)
(Pb)
(Mn)
(Hg)
Molybdenum (Mo)
Nickel
Silver
Selenium
Strontium
Thallium
Tin
Tungsten
Vanadium
Zinc
(HI)
(Ag)
(Se)
(Sr)
(Tl)
(Sn)
(W)
(V)
(Zn)
Concentration
in Coal (ppm)
10,440-12,900
0.50-1.26
4.45-14.02
0.47-2.52
2.90-9.57
13.75-18.00
8.30-15.16
1.00-6.59
3.80-10.00
4.90-34.78
33.80-49.40
0.12-0.20
5.00-7.54
16.00-21.07
0.03-0.12
2.08-2.20
10.00-23.00
0.29-2.00
0.03-4.79
0.10-3.00
28.50-32.71
46-272
Bioassay
Test Compound
AlClg
SbCl3
NaAs02
CdCl2
CoCl3
CrCl2
CuCl2
Ge02
LaCl3
PbCl2
MnCl2
HgCl2
Mo02Cl2
NiCl2
AgN03
Na2Se04
SrCl2
T1C13
SnCl2
wo2ci2
V2°5
ZnCl2
Detection
Limit (AAS)
0.20 ppb
2.00 ppb
0.80 ppb
0. 01 ppb
1 . 60 ppb
0.40 ppb
0.20 ppb
0.20 ppm
2.00 ppm
0.20 ppb
0.04 ppb
0.10 ppb
2.00 ppb
2.00 ppb
0.02 ppb
2.00 ppb
1 . 00 ppb
0.40 ppb
4.00 ppb
1 . 00 ppm
0.02 ppm
0.004 ppb
1
 The majority of values are from Ruch et. a]_. (9), Fulkerson et. al_. (10), and
 Carter (11), and represent means for multiple coal samples taken largely
 from Western Kentucky and Southern Illinois.  Lower means for Ag, Tl, Sn
 and W are from Lloyd (39), and the upper mean  for Ag is from Vaughan et al_.
 (4).

-------
    TABLE 13. PHYSICAL-CHEMICAL CHARACTERISTICS AND ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES FOR SELECTED ORGANIC CHEMICALS
ORGANIC COMPOUND
Aniline *
Atrazine
Benzidine
Chlorobenzene
Chloroform
2,4-D
Dieldrin
D1-2-ethylhexyl-
phthalate
Endrin
Hexachloro-
benzene
Malathion
Phenol
Toxaphene
CLASS OF SOLUBILITY
COMPOUND mg/1
aromatic amine
chlorinated
hydrocarbon
aromatic amine
chlorinated
hydrocarbon
chlorinated
hydrocarbon
chlorinated
hydrocarbon
chlorinated
hydrocarbon
carboxylic acid
chlorinated
hydrocarbon
chlorinated
hydrocarbon
organic phosphate
aromatic
hydrocarbon
chlorinated
hydrocarbon
35000
33
400
Insol.
7.2
620
pract.
Insol .
Insol.
0.23
pract.
Insol.
144
67000
pract.
insol.
VAPOR PRESSURE
mm Hg @ (°C)
1.0 (34)
3xlO-7 (20)
1.0 (126)
10.0 (22)
100.0 (10.4)
0.4 (160)
3x1 O"6 (20)
1.3 (200)
2x10-7 (25)
IxlO"5 (20)
4x1 O"5 (30)
1.0 (40)
0.2-0.4 (25)
ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES
EXTRACTION DETECTION1
SOLVENT METHOD
acetone, benzene
methyl ene chloride,
hexane
chloroform, hexane,
acetone
methyl ene chloride,
hexane
cyclohexane, ether,
hexane
methyl ene chloride,
hexane
chloroform, hexane,
acetone
methyl ene chloride,
hexane
methyl ene chloride,
hexane, acetone
methyl ene chloride,
hexane
ethyl acetate, hexane
chloroform
methyl ene chloride,
hexane, acetone
A
B,C
D
B
E,F
B
B
B
B
B
G
H
B
DETECTION
LIMIT ug/1
0.01-.1
0.01-.1
0.01-.1
0.01-.1
0.01-.1
0.01-.1
0.01-.1
0.01-.1
0.01-.1
0.01-.1
0.01-.1
2
0.01-.1
REFERENCES2
1,2,3,5
4,6,9,12,14,15
2,7,8
1,6,7,9,14,15
2,7,10
CO
4,6,9,14,15 '
3,4,6,9,12,14,15
6,7,13
3,4,6,9,11,12,14
4,6,9,12,14,15
4,9,12,14,15
1,9
4,6,9,12,14,15
following page.

-------
                                       -  35 -

                                  TABLE 13 CONTINUED


 Key to Organic Detection Methods

 A.  GC Flame ionization detector              E.  GC Electron capture detector
        Column - 1% SE-30                            Column - 20% Carbowax, 20M with
 B.  GC Electron capture detector                     microcoulometric detector
        Column - 10% DC-200 Anakrom ABS        F-  GC Electron capture detector
 C.  GC Flame ionization detector                     Column - 3% OV-17
        Carbowax 20M on Gas-chromosorb Q       G.  GC Electron capture detector
 D.  GC Alkali flame ionization  detector              Column - 4% SE-30 and 6% QF-1
        Column - 3% OV-17                     H.  Colorimetric-spectrophotometric
                                                     technique- 4-aminoantipyrine reaction

^References to Methods of Organic  Analysis

 1.  The Merck Index, 8th Edition.  1968.  (P.G. Stecher, ed., M. Windholz, D.S. Leahy,
        assoc. eds.), Merck and  Company,  Inc., Rahway, N.J.  p. 84.
 2.  Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 55th Edition.  1974-1975.  (R.C. Weast, ed.),
        Chemical Rubber Company, Cleveland, Ohio.
 3.  Chesters, G., H.B. Pionke,  and T.C.  Daniel.  1974.  Ir[  Pesticides in Soil and
        Water.  University of Wisconsin,  Madison, WisconsTff.  pp. 451-550.
 4.  Martin, Hubert and Charles  R. Worthing.  1974.  Pesticide Manual, 4th Edition.
        British Crop Protection  Council,  Boots Company Ltd., Nottingham, Eng.  565pp.
 5.  Fales, Henry M. and John J. Pisano.   1964.  In  Biomedical Applications of Gas
        Chromatography.  (H.A. Szymanski,  ed.), Plenum Press, N.Y.  pp.31-87.
 6.  Hurley, John T.  1974.  American Water Works Association Journal, 66: 27-31
 7.  Condensed Chemical Dictionary, 8th Edition.  1971.  (G.C. Hawley, ed.),
        Van Nostrand Reinhold Company,  N.Y.  971 pp.
 8.  Bruser, D.  1976.  Department of Chemistry, University of Kentucky, Personal
        Communication.
 9.  Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 13th Edition.
        1971.  APHA, AWWA, WPCF, Washington, D.C.  pp. 100-107.
10.  Cuopra, N.M. and L.R. Sherman.  1972.  Anal. Chem. 44(6): 1036-1038.
11.  Veith, G.D. and V.M. Comstock.  1975.  J. Fish. Res. Bd. Canada 32(10): 1849-1851.
12.  Official Methods of Analysis  of the  Association of Official Analytical Chemists,
        12th Edition.  1975.  (W.  Horwitz, ed.), Association of Official Analytical
        Chemists, Washington, D.C.  1094  pp.
13.  Bryant, H.  1976.  Department of Entomology, University of Kentucky,  Personal
        Communication.
14.  Pesticide Analytical Manual,  Vol.  1.  1975.   (B.M. McMahon and L.D. Sawyer,  eds.),
        U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare.  Food and Drug  Administration,
        Rockville, Md.
15.  Pesticide Analytical Manual,  Vol.  2. 1974.   (J.R. Markus and B.  Pumz,  eds.),
        U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare.  Food and Drug  Administration,
        Rockville, Md.

-------
                                              TABLE 14

                   SURVIVAL  FREQUENCIES  FOR CONTROL  POPULATIONS OF AQUATIC EMBRYOS
EMBRYONIC BIOASSAYS
TEST SPECIES
CATFISH
#




FOWLER'S TOAD


GOLDFISH




LEOPARD FROG





TROUT





COMPOUND/WATER HARDNESS
BORIC ACID @
50 ppm CaC03
200 ppm CaCCh
BORAX @
50 ppm CaCO*
200 ppm CaC03
BORIC ACID 0
50 ppm CaCO?
200 ppm CaC03
BORIC ACID 0 ^~
50 ppm CaC(h
200 ppm CaCOs
BORAX @
50 ppm CaCOo
200 ppm CaCOs
BORIC ACID @
50 ppm CaCOo
200 ppm CaCOa
BORAX @
50 ppm CaCOs
200 ppm CaC03
BORIC ACID @
50 ppm CaCOo
200 ppm CaCOs
BORAX @
50 ppm CaCOo
200 ppm CaC03
COMBINED
POPULATION SIZE

304
258

371
368

443
410

294
294

249
249

268
233

268
233

242
242

252
252
%
AT HATCHING

93
94

97
98

92
94

94
93

93
93

90
89

90
89

91
91

92
92
CONTROL SURVIVAL1
AT 4 DAYS POSTHATCHING

91
93

97
98

92
94

94
93

92
92

89
87

89
87

91
91

87
87
                                                                                                              CO
                                                                                                              0>
«,,fc.^ tests at the two water hardness levels (50 and 200 ppm CaCOa) were conducted simultaneously,
experimental results were gauged against the same populations of control animals.

-------
                                                        TABLE  15
                       TERATOGENESIS  IN AQUATIC  EMBRYOS SURVIVING TREATMENT WITH BORIC ACID AND BORAX
BIOASSAYS
SPECIES
CATFISH





GOLDFISH






TROUT




FOWLER'S
TOAD


LEOPARD
FROG




TOXICANT &
HARDNESS
BORIC ACID @
50 ppm CaCOo
200 ppm CaC03
BORAX @
50 ppm CaC0.3
200 ppm CaCOs
BORIC ACID @
50 ppm CaCOo,
200 ppm CaC03
BORAX @
50 ppm CaOh
200 ppm CaC03

BORIC ACID (<>
50 ppm CaCO?
200 ppm CaC03
BORAX @
50 ppm CaCOg
200 ppm CaC03

BORIC ACID @
50 ppm CaC03
200 ppm CaC03

BORIC ACID @
50 ppm CaCOg
200 ppm CaC03
BORAX G>
50 ppm CaCOo
200 ppm CaCO 3
NO. ANIMALS
ANOMALOUS1

77
125

84
107

65
26

44
68


58
278

40
33


810
544


209
190

155
151
PERCENT DISTRIBUTION OF
DWARFED
BODY

6
2

38
21

-
-

2
-


2
3

10
3


-
-


-

-

CRANIUM

3
5

2
2

2
-

-
-


10
8

25
13


1
1


-

1
1
VERTEBRAL
COLUMN

53
93

55
75

93
100

93
91


84
80

40
63


16
12


6
33

49
92
ANOMALIES
FINS

38
-

-
-

5
-

-
2


-
2

3
6


-
-


-

-
1
BY AREAS AFFECTED
NERVOUS YOLK SAC &
SYSTEM ABDOMEN

-
_

5
2

-
-

5 ^
7 ^
i

4
2 5

5 17
15


83
87


94
67

50
6
"'includes anomalous survivors for all exposure levels

-------
                                            TABLE 16
                         TERATOGENIC EFFECTS OF METALS ON TROUT EMBRYOS
                                          PERCENT SURVIVAL AT HATCHING1
:ORCEN
in
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
1.
2.
5.
7.
10.
TRATION*
ppm CHoHg Hg ^
001 90 3) 90 2
002 75 9) 72 8
005 57 10) 59 11
_LO -4-O .LO
Cd ^ Cu As ^
) 98(2) 97(4)
1 94 2)
?) 97 7 90(10)
Zn+2*
99
-
100(1)
007 46(17) 46 19) 97(4)
010 33(20) 34(22) 97(6) 92(7) 100
025 29(35) 24(4.
050 0 0
075
100 0 0
250
500 0 0
750
000
500
000
500
000
3) 96 7) 82(8) 100(2)
91 9) 65(11) 99(1)
82 6) 65(5) 98
58(11) 63(4) 96 5)
38(32) 45(9) 83 11)
32(28) 24(31) 67 8)
28(26) 0 47(18)
5 0 30(27)
002
0 - 1
0
0 - 0
TL50 0.005 0.005 0.10 0.10-0.25 0.50-0.75
98(1)
-
98(3)
98(3)
99(7)
-
91(2)
-
56(4)
25(8)
1(100)
0
—
1.00
Se+6
99(2)*
-
99(1)*
-
90(2)*
-
91(1)*
-
90(2)*
-
85(4)
-
82(7)
75(6)
52(11)
50(10)
41(15)
5.00
                                                                                                         GJ
                                                                                                         00
 Percent survival includes all embryos which completed hatching.  Frequencies of survivors
 exhibiting gross anomalies are given parenthetically.

^Concentrations based on content of metal added to Holtfreter's culture water.
 Asterisks designate cultures where NaCl content was reduced to 0.1 g/1.

-------
                                        TABLE 17
                   TOXICITY  OF INORGANIC MERCURY  (HgCl2) TO FISH EMBRYOS


                                     PERCENT SURVIVAL AT HATCHING1
CONCENTRATION
(ppm)
0.001
0.002
0.005
0.007
0.010
0.025
0.050
0.075
0.100
0.250
0.500
1.000
5.000
10.000
Ti-50

TROUT (24)
89
66
51
37
26
13
0
-
0
-
0
0
0
0
0.005

CATFISH (6)
100
97
92
91
84
60
30
26
20
14
1
0
0
0
0.025

GOLDFISH(3)
100
100
99
99
98
96
94
66
50
25
13
0
0
0
0.10

BASS (4)
99
96
95
92
86
83
81
70
68
39
14
0
0
0
0.10-0.25
                                                                                                     I
                                                                                                    co
Hatching time in days is given parenthetically.

-------
                                                      TABLE 18
                                 TOXICITY OF INORGANIC MERCURY TO AMPHIBIAN EMBRYOS


PERCENT SURVIVAL AT HATCHING
CONCLNIRAI10N
(ppm) Gastrophryne Hyla
carol inensis[3] squirel!
0.001
0.002
0.005
0.007
0.010
0.025
0.050
0.075
0.100
0.250
0.500
0.750
1.000

51
35
22
0
0
0
0
0
-
-
-
_
—

80
-
44
-
0
_
0
-
0
_
_
-
—
Hyla chr
a|_3] cephala[

82
64
44
13
0
0
0
0
_
_
_
_
-
yso- Rana
3] pipiens

96
87
72
62
47
34
9
1
0
_
0
_
0
Bufo
;[6] fowl eri [

99
100
100
100
98
79
18
8
0
0
0
-
0
Bufo
.3] punctatu;

100
100
100
99
92
83
35
9
0
0
0
_
0
Rana Rana
;[3] gryTTo[6] heckscheri[6]

100
_
99
96
94
89
75
56
17
0
0
0
0

100
-
100
100
94
90
64
48
23
0
0
0
0






1
.£»
O
1





TL
  50
0.001
0.005
0.005
0.010   0.025-0.05   0.025-0.05
0.075
0.075

-------
                                                    TABLE  19


                                  CORRELATION OF PERCENT EGG  HATCHABILITY WITH
                            POLLUTION-INDUCED REDUCTION IN DIVERSITY OF PISCINE FAUNA
MONITORING
SITE1
Cane Run
Town Branch
Wolf Run
East Hickman Creek
West Hickman Creek
Gainesway Branch
Hickman Creek
Shelby Branch
Kentucky River
Elkhorn Creek
Steel e's Run

FISH
0
0
40
56
63
70
74
81
83
86
91
PERCENT EGG
AMPHIBIANS
0
0
18
45
58
74
82
90
89
92
97
HATCHABILITY2
FISH & AMPHIBIANS
0
0
24
48
60
73
80
87
87
89
94
DIVERSITY OF
I SPECIES/EXPECTED^
0/15
0/15
2/15
8/17
11/16
7/10
15/22
14/17
21/25
43/48
15/15
FISH FAUNA3
% SPECIES REMAINING
0
0
13
47
69
70
68
82
84
90
100
 ''streams and rivers selected to represent various levels of water pollution resulting from recent increases
 in urbanization and industrialization in the Kentucky Bluegrass region.
2Egg hatchability data combined and averaged for four species of fish (rainbow trout, largemouth bass, goldfish,
 channel catfish) and five species of amphibians (squirrel treefrog, gray treefrog, narrow-mouthed toad,
.pig frog, red-spotted toad).
3Data on fish fauna for past 22 years taken from Carter (70), Jones (71), Kuehne (72), Laflin (73), MacGregor
.and Andre (74), Westerman and Westerman (75), and Small (76).
^Number species persisting at monitoring sites/number of species reported in earlier censuses.

-------
           - 42 -
         APPENDIX II
SYNOPSIS OF BIOASSAY PROCEDURES

-------
                                      - 43 -
I.  Preparation of Culture Water.
       If an adequate supply of natural  water free of background contamination  is
not available, reconstituted water may be used.   A synthetic culture water which
has been found satisfactory for bioassay procedures is given in Table 3,  and
possesses ionic composition and physicochemical  characteristics similar  to Mount's
spring water (55).   Synthetic culture water should be prepared from charcoal
filtered, distilled-deionized or double deionized water having a conductivity of
0.25 ymhos or less.   Routine monitoring should be conducted for possible  background
contaminants (.6.3..,  heavy metals,  chlorinated hydrocarbons).
       Culture water may be prepared from the following three stock solutions.
Reagent grade chemicals should be used.
       1.  NaHC03             100 g/1
           KC1                  5 g/1
       2.  CaCl2               60 g/1
       3. MgS04-7H20           60 g/1
       To prepare culture water with hardness levels of 50-200 ppm CaCOs, stock
solutions should be blended in the following ratios and diluted to a final volume
of 20 liters using distilled-deionized water.

       Stock Reagent               Water Hardness Level (ppm CaC03)
                                      50         100        200
       NaHC03 + KC1                 20.0 ml      20 ml      20 ml
       CaCl2                        12.5 ml      25 ml      50 ml
       MgS04-7H20                   12.5 ml      25 ml      50 ml
II.  Setup of Bioassay System.
       Continuous flow bioassays should be set up and operating at least 24-72 hours
prior to introducing test organisms, allowing sufficient time for adjustments and
stabilization of toxicant level and other parameters (.§_.£., temperature, dissolved
oxygen, pH).  During this period all test parameters should be monitored at regular
8-12 hour intervals.

-------
                                      - 44 -
A.   Preparation  for  testing.
        Bioassays preferably should be conducted in walk-in, temperature-controlled
environmental  rooms,  disinfected  before use with a microbicide and 12-24 hours of
ultra-violet  irradiation.  Bioassay glassware should be chemically cleaned using
the  procedure given  below or  some suitable alternative.

        1.   Rinse toxicant solutions from all glassware.
        2.   Scrub with Alconox detergent and rinse with tap water.
        3.   Rinse thoroughly in tap distilled water and allow to dry.
        4.   Soak  in acetone for 15-20 minutes and allow to dry.
        5.   Rinse and  soak in  tap  distilled water.
        6.   Soak  in concentrated nitric acid for 15-30 minutes.
        7.   Rinse in  glass-distilled water.
        8.   Soak  for  several hours in glass-distilled or deionized water.
        9.   Dry at 300°  F or autoclave.
       10.   Allow cooling to room  temperature and cover with parafilm.
       11.   Store in  closed dust-free cabinet.

B.   Installation of  peristaltic and syringe pumps.
        Prior  to  performing bioassays, tests should be conducted on all pumping units
to calibrate  and evaluate reproducibility of flow rates.  The variable speed
Brinkmann  (model  131900) and  Gilson (models HP 8 and HP 16) peristaltic pumps.fitted
with tygon  tubing, generally give  satisfactory performance.  Periodic adjustments
should  be made in pumping rate to offset effects of wear on tubing.  Tygon tubing
should  be replaced after 2-3  weeks of operation.
        Syringe pumps  should be equipped with up to six double-ground glass syringes.
For this purpose we have used a model 355 Sage syringe pump equipped with a modified
holder  (Fig.  3).  Generally,  more satisfactory performance is obtained when syringe
pumps are mounted outside the environmental room, obviating effects of reduced
temperature and/or high humidity.  Each set of syringes should be matched for equal
diameter and  stroke volume.
C.  Setup of mixing and culture chambers.
        Each cultuVe chamber (e..£., 300 ml modified deep  etri dish) is connected to
a mixing chamber  (e.&., 250 ml sidearm Erlenmeyer flask) using 1/4" i.d. polyethylene
or teflon tubing.  A  separate peristaltic pump channel should be connected to each

-------
                                      -  45  -
mixing flask, using tygon tubing.   A liquid flowmeter  (size  no.  12,  Roger  Gilmont
Instruments, Great Neck,  N.Y.)  should be installed  in  each line  to calibrate  and
monitor flow.  Each mixing flask should  receive its own  syringe  pump line.  Teflon
tubing (e_.£., McMaster-Carr Co., Chicago, 111.) should be used for this  purpose,  and
a flowmeter (Gilmont Microflowmeter) should be inserted  in each  syringe  pump  line.
Teflon rapid-disconnects  may be used in  connecting  pumping lines to  flow meters.
       Culture water should receive continuous aeration  supplied either  to the
mixing chamber or the culture water reservoir which feeds the peristaltic  pump.
The latter is advised when testing more  volatile toxicants.   The air line  to  the
culture room should be equipped with a filter and moisture trap  (e_.£., McMaster-
Carr Co., 40 y or less).
D.  Maintenance of syringe pumps.
       While syringes may be removed individually from the pump  and  replaced  with
a fresh set, it is generally more expeditious to leave them  mounted, retract  the
drive carriage and refill them in place.  In either case,  the syringe lines must
be clamped securely to prevent toxicant discharge into the mixing chambers.  Solutions
used to fill syringes should be analyzed to confirm concentration of the toxicant
to be delivered to the mixing flask.  The rate of toxicant injection should be
calculated to dilute culture water to desired exposure levels.

III.  Acquisition and Care of Test Animals.
       The investigator should be familiar with the basic  biology of his selected
test species, including some knowledge of (1) taxonomy,  (2)  geographical distribution,
(3) ecology and natural history, (4) life cycle and reproductive behavior  (e_.c[.,
optimum spawning temperature, hatching time), and (5)  embryonic development
(e_.c[., cleavage, gastrulation, organogenesis).  Such background information is
essential to the selection of test species and the use of developmental  stages for
bioassay purposes.
A.  Selection of animal test species.
       As noted above, we have found sensitivity to toxicants to vary substantially
for eggs of different fish and amphibian species.  Therefore, where  possible, we
recommend the use of 2-3 test species,  selected for different developmental  character-
istics (e_.£., egg type, yolk volume, hatching  time, cleavage pattern).    The fish
and amphibian species we have used most extensively are listed  in Table 10,  together

-------
                                       -  46 -
 with  data on hatching time,  egg production, seasonal  availability and source of
 supply.
 B.  Obtaining gravid animals.
        Gravid animals should be collected from sources  reasonably free of environmental
 contaminants.  Particular consideration  should be given to  chlorinated hydrocarbons
 and other toxicants with high  bioaccumulation potential  and which may concentrate
 to  high  levels in eggs and gonadal  tissues, affecting hatchability.  Federally
 supported investigators may coordinate through the Director of  Sport Fisheries and
 Wildlife to obtain gravid animals from a number of Federal  Hatcheries.
 C.  Maintenance of adult animals.
        Once obtained, gravid animals  may be maintained  for  short periods of time in
 large capacity non-flow, temperature-regulated fish tanks (e_.£., 100 gal Living
 Stream fiberglass tank, Frigid Units, Toledo, Ohio).  However,  for longer storage,
 150-300  gal  flow-through, temperature-regulated, fiberglass tanks should be used.
 If  an adequate supply of well  or spring  water is not available, charcoal filtered
 dechlorinated tap water generally proves satisfactory.   The source of water should
 be  monitored for possible background  contaminants.   If  available water supply will
 not support an adequate flow-through  culture, fish  tanks may be equipped with
 high  capacity recirculating  filters (e_.£., activated charcoal,  filter floss).  Such
 filters  are particularly useful  for removing  food debris and other particulates
 from  the culture water.  Adequate aeration should be supplied to all fish tanks.
       A high quality fish food should be used to support fish  populations (e_.£.,
 Purina;  Silver Cup).   However, as certain lots of food  may  contain high levels of
 trace contaminants,  it is advisable to analyze for  suspected toxicants (£.£., heavy
 metals,  chlorinated  hydrocarbons).
 D.  Egg  spawning techniques.
       In the event  freshly  spawned eggs cannot be  obtained in  the laboratory or from
 local  hatcheries,  artificial spawning may be  used.   Animals should be selected in
 optimum  spawning condition,  as underripe or overripe  eggs may exhibit substantially
 reduced  hatchability  (64,  65).   The general appearance  of the eggs and external
 features  of  the  adult animal (.§.£., body size and shape, breeding color, extension
 of  the urogenital  papilla) may be used as indicators  of optimum spawning conditions.
 For best  results,*eggs  maintained in  control  cultures should give at least 75%
 hatchability.  Lower  hatching  frequencies generally indicate an inadequate source
of eggs and  sperm  or  faulty culture technique.

-------
                                      -  47  -
       Egg and sperm collecting techniques  vary with  different  test  species.   Using
the method of Leitritz (64),  the artificial stripping technique works well  for the
rainbow trout.  Gravid females should be artificially spawned as  soon as  eggs  can
be obtained with a gentle to  moderate stripping action.   Males, which are usually
ripe concurrent with the females, may be spawned  several  times  during the breeding
season.  Eggs from the goldfish and numerous  other species  may  be collected by
similar procedures.  Temperature change  and/or hormonal  injection (300  IU HCG/454 g
body weight, administered I.P.) may be used to initiate  spawning  in  such  species as
the goldfish.  When artificial stripping is not feasible, eggs  sometimes  can be
collected by the incision method (64).  We  have used  the latter satisfactorily for
both channel catfish and largemouth bass, despite a modest  reduction in egg hatchability.
       Once eggs and sperm have been collected, they  should be  mixed in spawning
trays or large glass finger bowls for 10-15 minutes,  avoiding exposure  to fluorescent
light.  Preferably, eggs from several females should  be  mixed prior  to  setting up
test sub-samples, to minimize individual variations in hatchability  or  sensitivity  to
toxicants.
       It should be noted that eyed trout eggs (i_.£., 12-15 developmental days) can
be obtained by air express from a number of hatcheries and  are  particularly useful
for initial bioassay screening studies.   In addition, fresh catfish  spawn can  be
successfully shipped by air express.  It should be noted, however, that sensitivity
of the bioassay may be somewhat diminished  if early developmental stages  are omitted
from the test.

IV.  Performance of Bioassay Tests.
A.  Introduction of eggs to chambers.
       Egg samples (100-150)  should be introduced into each culture chamber, using a
graduated beaker or measuring scoop.  Final egg tallies  may be delayed until all
bioassay cultures have been established.  Care should be taken not to overcrowd
or unnecessarily contaminate cultures.
B.  Monitoring of bioassay cultures.
       Toxicant exposure levels  should be confirmed by direct  chemical analyses
performed on all bioassay cultures at regular daily intervals.    It  is particularly
important to stabilize toxicant  concentration before  introduction of eggs  into the
bioassay system, and to monitor  exposure levels carefully  during the first 24-48 hours
after egg treatment is initiated.

-------
                                      - 48 -
       Cultures also should be monitored daily for the following test parameters:
temperature, pH, alkalinity, conductivity, dissolved oxygen, water hardness, and
ammonia.  Also, flow rates from both the syringe and peristaltic pumps should be
measured at least twice daily.
C.  Observation of test animals.
       Test animals and culture conditions should be observed daily to gauge extent
of development and remove dead specimens.  Lack of embryonic development, discoloration
of eggs and vascular degeneration are useful criteria for early recognition of
embryonic mortality.  Where necessary, reference may be made to standard embryological
staging guides (64, 66-69).
       Contamination of the cultures should be minimized by maintaining semi-sterile
test conditions.  In the event of soft egg disease or fungus, cultures may be treated
according to the procedures recommended below:
       1.  Malachite green procedure.
           a. Prepare stock solution of malachite green by dissolving 100 g of
              dye in 100 ml distilled water.
           b. Dilute stock solution 1:15,000 (v/v) with distilled water.
           c. Decant the culture water from the exposure chamber.
           d. Add 100 ml of malachite green solution to the dish and let stand
              for 30 seconds.
           e. Decant malachite green solution.
           f. Rinse eggs carefully with fresh culture water to remove excess dye.
       2.  Betadine procedure.
           A 1:5 solution of Betadine (povidone-iodine, Purdue Frederick Co., Norwalk,
           Conn.) may be substituted for malachite green and used as given above.
       3.  Formaldehyde (1/1000 for 10 minutes) or acriflavine (1/2000 for 20 minutes)
           may be used as alternative methods of treatment.
As such treatment may introduce undesirable test variables, the most practical course
may be to discard contaminated cultures and repeat the bioassay experiment.

-------
                   - 49 -
                 APPENDIX III
NORMAL AND TERATOGENIC STAGES OF RAINBOW TROUT
                ALEVINS AND FRY
                  PLATES I-VI

-------
                        - 50 -
                         PLATE I


         NORMAL STAGES OF TROUT ALEVINS AND FRY
   Trout alevin at 1  week posthatching, showing heart
   (A), lateral line (B), dorsal  soft-ray fin (C),
   caudal  fin (D), mandible (E),  iris of eye (F), yolk
   sac with vitelline vessels (6), and urogenital
   papilla (H).  7.5X.
2.  Normal  trout fry at 21 days posthatching, showing
   external  nares (A), operculum (B), dorsal soft-
   ray fin (C), adipose fin (D), caudal  fin (E),
   mandible (F), pectoral fin (G), parr marks (H),
   pelvic fin (I), urogenital  papilla (J), anal  fin
   (K), and caudal peduncle (L).  Parr marks represent
   a characteristic pattern of skin pigmentation
   appearing in juvenile stages at about 2 weeks.
   10X.

-------
E   F
H
                                   J   K  L

-------
                                  - 51 -
                                  PLATE II


                   CADMIUM-INDUCED TERATOGENESIS IN TROUT


     Figures 1-6 show congenital deformities induced in trout embryos  by
cadmium treatment.  Photographs were taken 1-2 weeks subsequent to hatching
at a magnification of 7.5-10X.  The anomalies shown illustrate various
degrees of Siamese twinning and other defects (e_.£., immovable lower jaw,
anomalous or absent eyes, truncated upper jaw).

          1.  Twinning of head and trunk extends to posterior border
              of dorsal fin (arrow).  Left eye of lower twin is reduced.

          2.  Dorsal view of dicephalous alevin.  Partial twinning
              extends to dorsal fin (arrow).

          3.  Twinning with partial duplication of yolk sac (arrow).
              The upper jaws are truncated, with immobile lower jaws.

          4.  Complete Siamese twins conjoined only by the yolk sac
              (right arrow).  The upper twin displays relatively
              normal morphology, while the lower twin possesses a
              truncated upper jaw and immobile lower jaw (left arrow).

          5.  Conjoined assymetrical twins, with the upper arrow
              Indicating the host.  The parasite head (lower arrow)
              is defective, lacking normal eyes, upper jaw, and
              operculum.  Both partial twins possess dorsal fins.

          6.  A further example of partial twinning.   The less
              developed head has defective eyes (arrow).

-------

-------
                                  - 52 -
                                  PLATE III


                  TERATOGENIC DEVELOPMENT IN TROUT ALEVINS
     Figures 1-6 show teratogenic development induced by boron compounds
and heavy metals.   Figures 1-4 show various degrees of acute, inflexible
curvatures of the spinal column.   Photographs were taken 1-2 weeks  sub-
sequent to hatching at a magnification of 7.5-1 OX.

          1. Acute curvature of the spine (arrow) and reduced upper
             and lower jaws resulting from boron treatment.

          2. Defective curvature of the spine produced by a 1:1
             mercury-copper mixture.

          3. Anomalous cephalic and spinal structure induced by
             exposure to a mercury-selenium mixture.

          4. Cadmium-induced anomalies including a truncate upper
             jaw (arrow), curvature of the spine and defective iris
             of the eye.

          5. Treatment with a 1:1 mercury-cadmium mixture resulting in
             a grossly reduced caudal peduncle (upper arrow),
             truncated upper jaw, immobile lower jaw (lower arrow)
             and a dwarfed trunk.

          6. Boron-induced congenital defects including a reduced
             scoliotic caudal peduncle (upper arrow), defective
             eyes  (lower arrow),  absent upper jaw and immobile
             lower jaw.

-------
         0

•'.  '•$!

                                                                                                                    ©


-------
                                   -  53  -
                                  PLATE IV


                  TERATOGENIC DEVELOPMENT IN TROUT ALEVINS
     Figures 1-6 show teratogenic defects produced by boron and heavy
metals.  Photographs were taken 1-2 weeks posthatching at a magnification
of 7.5-10X.

           1. Acute ventral flexion of spinal column
             induced by treatment with boron.

           2. Acute lateral flexion of spinal column (scoliosis)
             produced by a mercury-copper mixture.

           3. Cadmium-induced flexion  of the spinal column.

           4. Acute, inflexible curvature and irregular structure
             of spinal column resulting from treatment with
             cadmium.

           5. Kyphosis of the spine (arrow) and dwarfed trunk
             resulting from an exposure to a mercury-selenium
             mixture.

           6. Anomalous spinal column and dwarfed trunk (arrow)
             produced by treatment with a mercury-copper mixture.

-------



-------
                                  - 54 -
                                   PLATE V


                   MERCURY-INDUCED TERATOGENESIS IN TROUT
     Photographs 1-7 show congenital  deformities frequently observed  in
trout alevins.  Photographs were taken 1-2 weeks subsequent to  hatching
at a magnification of 7.5-10X.  The anomalies most frequently encountered
included defective vertebral columns, immovable lower jaw,  absent  or
reduced fins, absent eyes, hydrocephalous brain development,  Siamese
twinning, and retarded yolk sac reabsorption.

          1. Twinning of head and anterior trunk, ventral view.
             Single yolk sac (arrow)  possesses paired yolk  stalks,
             one serving each partial twin.

          2. Dorsal view of dicephalous alevin.  Twinning extends
             to anterior border of dorsal fin (arrow).

          3. Inflexible C-shaped curvature of tail, accompanied  by
             hydrocephaly (arrow).

          4. Skeletal anomalies including an acute lordotic spine
             and a defective, immovable lower jaw (arrow).   Yolk
             sac reabsorption also is retarded (YS).

          5. Acute flexion of spinal  column, resulting from defective
             vertebral  development.   Retarded yolk sac reabsorption
             also is evident (YS).

          6. Anomalous, immobile curvature of spinal  column (arrows).

          7. Defective dorsal  fin and sharp angular flexion of  spinal
             column.

-------
YS

-------
                                  - 55 -
                                   PLATE VI


                    BORON-INDUCED TERATOGENESIS IN TROUT


     Photographs 1-6 show congenital deformities frequently observed
in trout alevins which survived treatment with boron compounds.   Photo-
graphs were taken 1-2 weeks subsequent to hatching at a magnification of
7.5-10X.  The anomalies most frequently encountered included various acute
defects of the vertebral column, amphiarthrotic (immobile)  jaw articulation,
absent or reduced fins, anomalous or absent eyes, dwarfed or irregular trunk
morphology, Siamese twinning, and retarded yolk sac resorption.

          1. Skeletal anomalies including an acute, lordotic
             spine, attenuated tail fin, and a defective,
             immobile lower jaw (arrow).

          2. Twinning of head and trunk, with a single tail.  A
             single yolk sac possesses paired yolk stalks,  one
             serving each partial twin.

          3. Acute scoliosis of the vertebral column and cephalic
             twinning.  Secondary head (arrow) is only partially
             formed.

          4. Kyphosis of the vertebral column with irregular,
             dwarfed trunk structure.

          5. Anomalous, inflexible curvature of spinal column,
             irregular, truncate upper jaw, immobile lower  jaw,
             and retarded yolk sac resorption.  Also, as seen
             in Figures 1 and 6, incomplete closure of the  choroid
             fissure has resulted in coloboma of the retina.  This
             condition is discernible as a vertical cleft at the
             mid-inferior border of the eye.

          6. Irregular, fixed curvature of the vertebral column
             similar to that shown in Figure 5.

-------

©


-------
                                       - 56 -
                                     BIBLIOGRAPHY
  1.  NAS-NAE Committee on  Water Quality Criteria.  1972.  Water Quality Criteria
         1972.   U.S.  Govt.  Print. Off., Washington, D.C.  593 pp.
  2.  Nelson, N.   1972.   Panel  on  Hazardous Trace Substances.  Environ. Res.,
         5:  249-362.
  3.  Schimmel, S.C.,  D.J.  Hansen  and J. Forester.  1974.  Trans. Amer. Fish.
         Soc., 103:  582-586.
  4.  Hansen, D.J., S.C.  Schimmel  and J. Forester.  1975.  Trans. Amer. Fish.
         Soc., 104:  584-588.
  5.  Nebeker, A.V.,  F.A. Puglisi  and D.L. DeFoe.  1974.  Trans. Amer. Fish.
         Soc., 103:  562-568.
  6.  Jensen, S.,  N.  Johansson  and M. Olsson.  1970.  Report LFI MEDD of the
         Swedish Salmon Research  Institute.
  7.  Locke,  D.O.  and  K.  Havey.  1972.  Trans. Amer. Fish Soc., 101: 638-643.
  8.  Cuerrier, J.P.,  J.A.  Keith and E. Stone.  1967.  Naturaliste Can., 94:
         315-320.
  9.  Burdick, G.E.,  E.J. Harris,  H.J. Dean, T.M. Walker, J. Skea and D. Colby.
         1964.   Trans.  Amer. Fish Soc., 93: 127-135.
10.  Hiltibran,  R.C.   1967.  Trans. Amer. Fish. Soc., 96: 414-416.
11.  Smith,  R.M.  and  C.F.  Cole.   1975.  J. Fish. Res. Board Can., 30 (12,
         part  1): 1894-1898.
12.  Dill, P.A.  and R.C. Saunders.  1974.  J. Fish. Res. Board Can., 31:
         1936-1938.
13.  Macek,  K.J.  1968.  J. Fish. Res. Board Can., 25: 1787-1796.
14.  Allison, D.B., J.  Kallman, O.B. Cope and C.C. Van Valin.  1963.
        .Science, 142:  958-961.
15.  Sterling, T.D.   1971.  Science, 174: 1358-1359.
16.  Bowes,  G.W., B.R. Simoneit, A.L. Burlingame, B.W. de Lappe and
        R.W. Risebrough.  1973.  Environ. Health Perspec., 2: 191-198.
17. Aulerich, R.J.,  R.K. Ringer, H.L. Seagran and W.G. Youatt.  1971.
        Can. J.  Zool., 49: 611-616.
                %
18. Nebeker, A.V. and F.A. Puglisi.  1974.  Trans. Amer. Fish. Soc.,
        103: 722-728.
19. Hansen,  D.J., P.R. Parrish, J.I. Lowe, A.J. Wilson, Jr. and P.O. Wilson.
        1971.  Bull. Environ.  Contam. Toxicol., 6(2): 113-119.

-------
                                       -  57  -
20. Johnson, D.W.   1968.   Trans.  Atner.  Fish.  Socl.,  97: 398-424.
21. Johnson, H.E.  and C.  Pecor.   1969.   Trans.  N. Amer. Wildl. Natur.
        Resour.  Conf., 34: 159-166.
22. Lane, C.E. and R.E.  Livingston.   1970.  Trans. Amer.  Fish. Soc.,
        99: 489-495.
23. Johnson, H.E.   1967.   The Effects of Endrin on the Reproduction of a
        Fresh Water Fish (Oryzias latipes).   Ph.D. dissertation,  University
        of Washington, Seattle.   149 pp.
24. Birge, W.J., A.G. Westerman and  O.W. Roberts.  1974.  In. 2nd  Annual
        NSF-RANN Trace Contaminants  Conference, Trace  Contaminants  in the
        Environment, 3: 316-320.
25. Pickering, Q.H. and W.N. Vigor.   1965.  Progve.  Fish  Cult., 27: 153-157.
26. Skidmore, J.F.  1965.  J. Fish.  Res. Board  Can., 23:  1037-1041.
27. 	.  1965.   Ann. Appl. Bio!., 56: 47-53.
28. Brungs, W.A.  1969.  Trans.  Amer. Fish. Soc.,  98:  272-279.
29. Hazel, G.R.  and S.J.  Meith.   1970.   Calif.  Fish  Game, 56: 121-124.
30. McKim, J.M., G. Christensen and  E.  Hunt.   1970.  J.  Fish. Res.  Board
        Can., 27:  1883-1889.
31. Birge, W.J.  and J.J.  Just.  1975.  U.S. Dept.  Interior, Res.  Report
        #84.  36 pp.
32. 	and J.J. Just.   1974.   U.S. Dept. Interior,  Res.  Report
        #71.  33 pp.
33. 	and O.W. Roberts.  1976.  Bull. Environ.  Contam.  Toxicol.,
        16(3): 319-324.
34. 	, O.W.  Roberts and J.A.  Black.  1976.   Bull.  Environ. Contam.
        Toxicol.,  16(3):  314-318.
35. Wallen, I.E.,  W.C. Greer and R.  Lasater.   1957.   Sew. Ind. Waste, 29:
        695.
36. Turnbull, H.,  J.G. DeMann and R.F. Weston.   1954.   Symposium on Waste
        Disposal in the Petroleum Industry, Ind. Eng.  Chem., 46:  324.
37. Sprague, R.W.   1972.   The Ecological Significance of Boron.  U.S. Borax
        Research Corporation, Anaheim, Calif.  58 pp.
38. Alabaster, J.S. 1957.  Proc. Brit. Weed Contr. Conf., 3: 807.

-------
                                        -  58  -
 39.  Birge,  W.J.,  J.A.  Black, A.G.  Westerman, J.E. Hudson and R.A. Freeman.
         1976.   Lehtal  and  Teratogenic  Effects of Metallic Pollutants on
         Embryogenesis  and  use  of Vertebrate  Embryos as Sensitive Indicators
         of  Environmental Quality.   Completion Report, NSF (RANN).
 40.  Takeuchi,  T.   1958.  Sci., Rep. Tohoku Univ. Ser. 4, Biol. 24 (1):
         33-43.
 41.  Hermanni,  H.H.   1972.   Wilhelm Roux1  Archiv., 171: 200-222.
 42.  Goldie,  M.  and  H.  Stierholz.   1964.   J. Amer. Osteo. Assoc., 63 (9):
         879-880.
 43.  Landauer,  W.   1952.  J. Exptl.  Zool., 120 (3): 469-507.
 44.  	.   1953.   Genetics, 38: 216-228.
 45.  Birge,  W.J. and J.A. Black.  1976.  Sensitivity of Vertebrate Embryos
         to  Boron  Compounds.  Completion Report, EPA.  pp. 1-62.
 46.  Hove, E.,  C.A.  Elvehjem and  E.B. Hart.   1939.  Amer. J. Physiol.,
         127: 689-701.
 47.  National Technical Advisory  Committee on Water Quality Criteria, U.S.
         Dept.  Interior.  1968.   234 pp.
 48.  Hynes,  H.B.N.   1960.   The  Biology  of  Polluted Waters.  Liverpool
         University  Press,  Liverpool.   202 pp.
 49.  Tarzwell,  C.M.   1971.   Proc. Roy.  Soc. Lond. B., 177: 279-285.
 50.  Warren,  C.E.  1971.  Biology and Water Pollution Control.  W.B.
         Saunders  Co.,  Philadelphia.  434  pp.
 51.  Birge, W.J.,  A.G.  Westerman  and J.A.  Black. 1975.  U.S. Dept. Interior,
         Res. Report #91.   27 pp.
 52.  Waller,  W.T.  and J. Cairns,  Jr.  1972.  Wat. Res., 6: 257-269.
 53.  Sparks,  R.E., J. Cairns, Jr.,  and  A.G. Heath.   1972.  Wat. Res.,
         6: 895-911.
 54.  LeClerc,  E. and F. Devlaminck.  1955.  Bull, de Beige. Condument
         Eaux., 28:  11.
55. Mount, D.I.  1968.  Wat. Res., 2(3):  215-223.
56. Dutt, G.R.  and T.W. McCreary.  1970.  Univ.  Arizona Ag. Exper.
        Station, Report #256.   83 pp.

-------
                                       - 59 -


57.  Water Resources  Data  for  Kentucky, Part 2.  1970.  U.S. Dept.
        Interior Geol.  Survey.  173 pp.

58.  McKee, J.E.  and  H.W.  Wolf.  1963.  Water Quality Criteria.  The
        Resource Agency of  Calif.   (2nd  ed.).  State Water Quality
        Control  Board,  Pub!.  #3A.   548 pp.

59.  Hart, W.B.,  P. Doudoroff, and J. Greenbank.  1945.  Evaluation of
        Toxidty of  Industrial  Wastes, Chemicals and Other Substances
        to Freshwater Fishes.  Water Control Lab., Atlantic Refining
        Co., Philadelphia.

60.   Bass Becking, L.G.M.,  I.R. Kaplan and D. Moore.  1960.  J. Geol.,
        68: 243-284.

61.  MacCrimmon,  H.R. and  W.H. Kwain.  1969.   Can. J. Zool., 47: 631-637.

62.  Eisler, R.  1957-  Trans. Amer.  Fish. Soc., 87: 151-162.

63.  Roberts, R.F. and H.E.  Allen.   1972. Trans. Amer.  Fish. Soc.,
        101 (4): 752-756.

64.  Leitritz, E.  1959.  Trout and  Salmon Culture.  State  of  California,
        Department of Fish and Game.   Fish  Bulletin No.  107,  169pp.

65.  Fish, G.R. and G.D. Ginnelly.   1966. Trans. Am.  Fish.  Soc.,  95:  104-107.

66.  Rugh, R.  1962.   Experimental  Embryological Techniques and Procedures.
        3rd Ed.  Burgess Publishing  Co.,  Minneapolis,  Minn.   501pp.

67.  Knight, A.E.  1963.  Trans. Am. Fish. Soc., 92:  344-355.

68.  Volpe, E.P., M.A. Wilkens, and  J.L.  Dobie.  1961.   Copeia tNo.  3):  340-349.

69.  Blaylock, B.G.  and N.A. Griffith.   1971.   Prog.  Fish-Cult., 33: 48.

70.  Carter, B.T.  1954.  Trans. Ky. Acad. Sci.,  15(3):  48-56.

71.  Jones, A.R.   1973.  Ky.  Fish.  Bull., No. 56.   108 pp.

72.  Kuehne, R.A.  1975.  U.S. Dept. Interior, Research Report #85.  33 pp.

73.  Laflin, B.D.  1970.  Ky. Fish.  Bull., No. 55.   46 pp.

74.  MacGregor, J.R.  and C.A. Andre.  1975.   Environmental  Impact Statement for
        Lexington, Kentucky.  Unpublished Report.

75.  Westerman, A.G.  and D.J. Westerman.  1975.  Unpublished data.

76.  Small, J., Jr.  1975.  Ecology, 56  (4): 827-840.

-------
1. REPORT NO.             ""    |:
  EPA- 5 6 O/S^TTjJK) 2	[
                                   fECHNICAL REPORT DATA
                            ,/ ,'fjsi nvJ Imuritciiwis on the revets l>t lor-1 i'i
                                                          J. RECIPIENT'S ACCf SSION-NO.
4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE
  "A Continuous Flow System Using  F1sh  and Amphibian
  Eggs  for Bioassay Determinations  on Embryonic Mortal
  and Teratogenesis."
                                                          5 REPORT DATE
                                                              APRIL 1977
7. AUTHOR(S)
  Wesley J. B1rge  and  Jeffrey A.  Black
OTPERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAML AND ADDRESS
  University of Kentucky
  Lexington, Kentucky
                                                          8 I tHFOHMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NO.
                                                           10. PROGRAM ELEMENT NO.
 12. SPONSORING AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS

  Office of Toxic Substances
  U.S. Environmental  Protection Agency
  Washington, D.  C.   20460
                                                                      ORGANISATION CODE
                                                           11. CONTRACT/GRANT NO.
                                                             EPA 68-01-4321
                                                          13, TYPt OF REPORT AND PERIOD COVERED

                                                          _.£!MALJECUIiICAL.REEflRI	I
                                                          14. SPONSORING AGENCY CODE
 16. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES
 16. ABSTRACT
       A procedure  is  described for continuous  flow bioassays on sensitive develop-
  mental stages  of  fish and other aquatic species.   Environmental toxicants may  be
  screened for teratogenic and other embryopathic  effects (e_.g_., mortality, locomotor
  impairment) on eggs, embryos, and early juvenile stages.   Toxicant concentration
  may be regulated  down to 1.0-0.1 ppb for an exposure period extending from  fertili-
  zation through 4-7 days posthatchlng.  Bioassays may be performed with either  natural
  or synthetic water,  and standard physlcochemical  parameters (e.g., temperature,
  water hardness, pH)  can be manipulated independently to determine effects on  toxicity
  The procedure  1s  suitable for use with a wide range of fish and amphibian species,
  including  rainbow trout, channel catfish,  largemouth bass, leopard frog and others.

       Concerning the  toxic effects of many  environmental trace contaminants, embryonic
  and early  juvenile stages constitute the critical "sensitive links"  in the  life
  cycles of  many aquatic animal species.  Reproductive potential of acquatic  animals
  may be severly restricted or abolished by  trace  levels of toxicants  which are harm-
  less or sublethal  to most adult organisms.
17.
                                KEY WORDS AND DOCUMENT ANALYSIS
                  DESCRIPTORS
  Bioassay
  Aquatic Pollutants
  F1sh Eggs
  Embryonic Mortality
  Teratogenesis
                                             b.lDENTIFIERS/OPCN ENDED TERM:,
                                                                        C.  COSATI I irlil/Ciroup
19. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT


  UNLIMITED
                                              Hi. SECURITY CLASS (Ihi* Hepiirt)
                                             _  UNCLASSIFIED   	
                                              20. SECURITY CLAGC jrV/ii'i page/

                                                UNCLASSIFIED
21. NO. OF PAGES



22TPR7CE
EPA Form 2220-1 (9-73)

-------