EPA-600/1-76-010a
January 1976
Environmental Health Effects Research Series
                          ASSESSMENT OF TOXICITY  OF
                     AUTOMOTIVE  METALLIC  EMISSIONS
                                                     Volume  I
                                           Health Effects Research Laboratory
                                          Office of Research and Development
                                         U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
                                   Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711

-------
                     RESEARCH REPORTING SERIES
Research reports of the Office of Research and Development,
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, have been grouped into
five series.  These five broad categories were established to
facilitate further development and application of environmental
technology.  Elimination of traditional grouping was consciously
planned to foster technology transfer and a maximum interface in
related fields.  The five series are:

          1.  Environmental Health Effects Research
          2.  Environmental Protection Technology
          3.  Ecological Research
          4.  Environmental Monitoring
          5.  Socioeconomic Environmental Studies

This report has been assigned to the ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH EFFECTS
RESEARCH series.  This series describes projects and studies relating
to the tolerances of man for unhealthful substances or conditions.
This work is generally assessed from a medical viewpoint, including
physiological or psychological studies.  In addition to toxicology
and other medical specialities, study areas include biomedical in-
strumentation and health research techniques utilizing animals -
but always with intended application to human health measures.
This document is available to the public through the National
Technical Information Service, Springfield, Virginia  22161.

-------
                                                EPA-600/l-76-010a
                                                January  1976
ASSESSMENT OF TOXICITY OF AUTOMOTIVE METALLIC EMISSIONS.  VOLUME  I;

  Assessment of Fuel Additives Emission Toxicity  via Selected

          Assays of Nucleic Acid and Protein Synthesis
                              By
                   David J.  Holbrook,  Jr.,  Ph.D.
                    Department  of  Biochemistry
                        School  of  Medicine
                   University of North. Carolina
                Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27514
                      Contract No.  68-02-1205
                         Project  Officer

                     Ms.  Frances P. Duffield
                Catalyst  Research. Program Office
                Health Effects Research Laboratory
           Research  Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711
              U.  S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
               OFFICE OF RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
               HEALTH EFFECTS RESEARCH LABORATORY
           RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK, NORTH CAROLINA 27711

-------
                              DISCLAIMER
     This report has been reviewed by the Health Effects Research
Laboratory, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, and approved for
publication.  Approval does not signify that the contents necessarily
reflect the views and policies of the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, nor does mention of trade names or commercial products
constitute endorsement or recommendation for use.
                                •ii

-------
                               ABSTRACT



      Various  parameters of  toxicity have been studied for salts of manga-

 nese,  lead, palladium and platinum.  Following  intraperitoneal injection,

 the acute  toxicities (LD-50 doses, 14-day observation period, doses ex-

 pressed  in molar quantities) in decreasing order, were:  PtCl, > Pt(SO, )„'

 4H20  (from B. F. Goldsmith) > PdCl^l^O >Pt(S04>2 '4H20  (from K and K Lab-

 oratories), MnCl2'4H20>PdSO, > PtCl2> PbCl-.  Following oral administration,

 the acute toxicities (LD-50 doses), in decreasing order, were:  PtCl, >
Pt(S04)-4H20> PdCl2'2H20, RuCl3> MnCl2.4H20 > PdS04> PtCl2>Pt02> PbO,

PdO, Mn02.

     Following dietary  (via drinking fluid) administration of soluble salts

of Pb2+ (PbCl2) or Pt + (PtCl4 or Pt(SC>4)2'4H20) , the highest concentra-

tions of metallic cations occurred in the kidney, intermediate levels in

the liver, and generally lower levels in the spleen, heart, testes, brain

and blood.  In rats which survived for 14-days following the administration

of approximately the oral LD-50 and intraperitoneal LD-50, the kidneys con-

tained approximately 16 and 37 ugPt/g wet tissue, respectively, and the

livers contained approximately 2 and 34 ug Pt/g wet tissue, respectively.

     Weights of five organs (liver, kidney, spleen, heart, testes) were

measured in rats which had been treated with various metallic salts in the

diet (either drinking fluid or solid feed).  The organ weights were ex-
                                                MnCl2'4H20 at a level of
pressed as a percentage of body weight.  Rats which received.1.6 or 3.7

g/liter (8.3 or 18.6 mmoles/liter) for 90 days did not show statistically

significant changes in  the weights of any organs.  PbCl2> at a level of

1.0 g/liter (3,7 mmole/liter) for 30 or 90 days, consistently increased the

kidney weights of treated rats (17% and 23% above control in the 90-day

experiments).  The use  of saturated solutions of PdCl2'2H20 (8 days) or of

PdSO, (8 or 30 days) as  the drinking fluid did not cause a consistent


                                  ill

-------
 change  in any  of  the  organ weights  of  the  treated rats.



      If PtCl,  was  added  to the drinking fluid at 183 mg/liter  (0.5 mmoles/



 liter)  for 30  or  90 days,  or  at  550 rag/liter  (1.6 nmoles/liter) for 8 days,

                                                                      •

 no  consistent  changes were observed in the organ weights.  If  the concen-



 tration-duration  of PtCl,  was increased to 550 mg/liter  (1.6 mmoles/liter)



 for 30  days  or 825 mg/liter  (2.4 ranoles/liter) for 9 days, the kidneys were



 increased in weight by approximately 6% in each of four  experiments and the



 testes  were  increased by approximately 11% in each of four experiments; how-



 ever, in each  tissue  in  each  individual experiments, the differences between



 control and  metal-treated  animals showed statistically significant differences



 (p<0.05)  or trends (p<0.10) in only  about one-half of  the experiments.



     After experimental  rats  were maintained on metal-containing diets for



 approximately  8, 30 or 90  days, hepatic microsomes were  isolated and the fol-



 lowing  parameters  related  to  in vitro  drug metabolism were measured:  yield



 of  microsomal  protein/g  liver; in vitro activities of aniline hydroxylase



 and aminopyrine demethylase;  content of cytochromes P-450 and b5/mg micro-



 somal protein.  Treatment with MnCl2'4H20, 1.6 g/liter (8.3 mmoles/liter)



 or  3.7  g/liter  (18.6 mmoles/liter)  for 90 days did not alter any of the



 studied  parameters of drug metabolism.  The administeration of low levels


     2+
 of  Pd    (saturated solution of PdCl2'2H20 for 8 days or saturated solution



 of  PdSO, for 8 or  30 days) in the drinking fluid resulted in   somewhat de-



 creased  activities of aniline hydroxylase and aminopyrine demethylase.



 PtCl2 (saturated solution as drinking water) did not produce consistently



 statistically different  levels of aniline hydroxylase or aminopyrine



demethylase.


                                                                4+
     A wide range of dose levels-duration of soluble salts of Pt   did not



cause consistent changes in the levels of aniline hydroxylase or aminopyrine
                                  iv

-------
demethylase in liver tissue; dosages and durations used included 0.5 mmoles/




liter (183 mg PtCl,/liter) for 30 and 90 days; 1.6 mmoles (550 mg PtCl,/




liter or 750 mg Pt(S04>2'4H20/liter for 8 days or for 30 days (PtCl^ only).




     Work has been completed on the development of a rapid and convient




method for the analysis of ribosomal RNA in studies of RNA synthesis.

-------
                         CONTENTS





                                                     Page




Abstract                                              ill




I.   Introduction                                      1




II.  Materials and Methods                             2




III. .Lethal Dose Studies                               3




IV.  Metal Content of Various Tissues                 11




V.   Organ Weights                                    15




VI.  Drug Metabolism In Vitro                         19




VII. Studies on RNA Synthesis In Vivo                 28




VIII.References                                       29




IX.  Appendix:  Data on Lethal Dose Levels            30
                            vi

-------
 I.   INTRODUCTION




      A.   Contract.   These studies were  conducted pursuant to contract  num-




 ber 68-02-1205 and  project number DU-73-B439 with the  Enviornmental  Pro-




 tection  Agency.




      B.   Importance £f  compounds.  Lead salts are an emission product  from




 mobile (or  automotive)  emission Bourses due to  the addition  of  tetraethyl




 lead to  gasoline.   Because of known  toxic properties of  lead salts,  it has




 been proposed  that  alkyl  manganese compounds be substituted  as  a fuel addi-




 tive for tetraethyl lead.   With the  introduction of platinum and palladium




 in  the catalytic converters of 1975-model year  vehicles,  it  is  of concern




 to  determine the quantities of platinum and palladium metal  and salts which




will be  in  emission products and the biological effects of these compounds




on mammalian tissues.




      C.   Studies undertaken.   Consequently, experiments were undertaken




in  this  laboratory  to study the effects  of various metal  salts  on the fol-




lowing:  acute lethal dose  following oral and intraperitoneal administra-




tion, growth of animals receiving the salts in  feed or drinking fluid, the




tissue concentration of some of the metals in various organs, the size of




selected organs, the in vitro activity of two representative microsomal




drug-metabolizing enzymes and the cytochrome P-450 and b5 concentrations




in liver, the activity in vitro of eucaryotic DNA polymerases, and RNA syn-




thesis in vivo.

-------
II.  MATERIALS AND METHODS





           All experimental  studies  were  conducted  With male Sprague-Dawley




      rats.   The  animals  were  received  at 3-3.5  weeks  of age and  were  main-




      tained  for  1-1.5  weeks before  use.   The  mean  body weights were usually




      100-110 g when  the  rats  were used for  the  lethal-dose  experiments  or




      started on  the  diets.




           In the  lethal  dose  experiments, the salts were administered orally




      (via  stomach tube)  or  intraperitoneally.   The rats were observed through




      a  14-day observation period.   In  the completed experiments,  the  LD-50




      values  were  calculated by the  method of  Litchfield and  Wilcoxon  (1).




           In the  diet  experiments,  four  rats  were  maintained per  cage.




      The metallic  salt under  study  was dissolved in the drinking  fluid.




     Animals  consumed  feed  and drinking  fluid ad libitum.  Analyses for




     metals  were  performed  on samples  from  three lots  of  feed (Purina




      Laboratory Chow).  The feed contained  (mean + std. dev.):  56 +  5 rag




     Mn/kg feed and 0.99 + 0.07 rag  Pb/kg feed;  the analyses  of the three




      lots for platinum were 0.09, < 0.02, and ^0.02 rag Pt/kg feed.  Measure-




     ments were made of the body weights of individual  rats  and feed and fluid




     consumption per cage of four rats at 7-day intervals during  the course of




     each diet experiment.




          At  the termination of the dietary experiments, samples  of liver




     were used for the isolation of microsomes.   Aniline hydroxylase was




     measured by the method  of Imai et al. (2),  modified by  the addition of




     HgCl2 (3).  Aminopyrine demethylase  was measured  by the formation of




     formaldehyde (Nash reaction) (4).

-------
      The  analyses  of  the  rat  tissues  for  platinum,  lead and manganese




 were  carried  out by Yoakum, Stewart and Sterrett  (5) of Stewart




 Laboratories,  Inc. by an  emission  spectrochemical method.
III.  LETHAL DOSE STUDIES




     The rats used  in these studies usually had a mean body weight of




 100-110 grams.  The LD-50 values and the 95% confidence limits were




 determined by the method of Litchfield and Wilcoxin  (1).

-------
      A.   Oral administration.   The summary of the  lethel  dose  studies  fol-
 lowing oral administration are  given  in Table 1.
      In  terms of  the  LD-50 (dose  lethal  to 50% of  the  animals  within the
 14-day . observation period),  the acute  toxicities  (expressed  in molar quan-
 tities),  in decreasing  order, were:  PtCl >
                         ,  PtCl2>Pt02>  PbO,  PbCl2>Mh02,  PdO.
                             4+
      Thus,  the  two  soluble Pt    salts were  found  to  be  the most  toxic  salts
 following oral  administration.   As anticipated, the  poorly absorbed, insol-
 uble  salts, namely  PbCl7,  PtCl_,  PbO, PtO,,,  PdO and  MnO», were the  least
         the latter            Z          Z
 toxic.   In ^     named  cases, doses could not be  increased sufficiently to
 attain  50%  lethality  in the experimental  rats and still maintain the volume
 administered  to 2%  or less of the body weight.
      In each  of these cases, the LD-50 dose  is greater  than  the  5,000  mg/kg
 body weight which the National  Institute  for Occupational Safety and Health
 uses as  a criterion for  inclusion as a toxic substance  in the Toxic Substances
 List. 1972 edition;^  '  thus, in terms of  the acute LD-50, the salts PbCl9,
  J ~ ~                                                                    £.
 PbO, PdO, Pt02, and Mn02 would  be considered "non-toxic" by  this  standard.
     Also included  in Table 1 are the LD-10 and LD-90,  i.e., the  doses
which cause the death of 10% and 90%, respectively,  of  the rats  in  the 14-
 days after oral administration.  In those cases where data are available,
 the order of  toxicities  for the oral LD-10, "the  minimal lethal  dose", is
 the same as that given above for the order of the LD-50 values.
     The slopes of  the  toxicity curves can be compared  by the ratio of the
 LD-90 to LD-10  (Table 1).  For  example, MnCl2*4H20 is relative non-toxic
and the oral  LD-10  dose  is 6.3 mmoles/kg  body weight.   However,  if  the dose
was increased 1.4-fold  to  9.0 mmoles/kg,  90% of the  treated rats  died.  In
contrast, PtCl,  was orally the most toxic of the  salts  tested; the ratio
of the LD-90  to LD-10 was  approximately 5.0.  The other soluble  or partially-

-------
     Table 1.




     Lethal Doses Following Oral Administration
Unit
Compound
ptci4


Pt(S04)2'4H20


PdCl2-2H20


RuCl3


MnCV4H20


PdS04


(per kg body
weight)
mmoles
mg salt
mg cation
mmoles
mg salt
mg cation
mmoles
mg salt
mg cation
mmoles
mg salt
mg cation
mmoles
mg salt
mg cation
mmoles
mg salt
mg cation
LD-50
(957= confidence limits)
0.70 (0.51-0.96)
240 (171-320)
136 (99-188)
2.2 (1.57-3.1)
1010 (720-1400)
430 (310-600)
2.7 (2.2-3.4)
590 (470-730)
290 (240-360)
3.2 (2.4-4.0)
650 (500-830)
310 (240-400)
7.5 (7.0-8.1)
1490 (1380-1610)
410 (380-450)
>7.5
>1500
>790
LD-10
0.31
104
60
1.37
630
270
1.56
330
166
1.78
370
180
6.3
1260
350
--
--
--
LD-90
1.57
530
310
3.5
1620
690
4.8
1030
520
5.4
1130
550
9.0
1780
490
--
--
--
LD-90
LD-10
5.1


2.6


3.1


3.0


1.4


--



-------
                    Table 1 (continued)
    Unit
(per kg body
  weight)
         LD-50
(95% confidence limits)
LD-10
LD-90
LD-90
LD-10
mmoles
mg salt
mg cation
mmoles
mg salt
mg cation
mmoles
mg salt
mg cation
mmoles
mg salt
mg cation
mmoles
mg salt
mg cation
mmoles
mg salt
mg cation
>8
>2,000
>1,400
>35
>8,000
>6,900
>45
>10,000
>9,300
»35
»9,600
>>7,200
» 82
>> 10,000
>> 8,700
(est.) 135
(est.) 12,000
(est.) 7,400
—
--
--
--
--
--
*30
<6,700
<6,200
21-35
5,800-9,600
4,300-7,200
--
--
--
(est.) 60
(est.) 5,200
(est.) 3,300

-------
 soluble  salts  tested had  intermediate LD-90 to LD-10 ratios of 2.5-3.1.
          acute
      If  the^toxicities  following oral administration are expressed as mg

 of cation/kg of body weight,  the LD-50 values were  in the following de-

 creasing order:   PtCl, > PdCl2'2H20, RuCl3>MnCl2'4H20, Pt(S04)2'4H20 >

 PdS04>PtCl2>  Mn02, Pt02,  PbCl2> PbO, PdO.

      Likewise, if the LD-10 values are expressed  in terms of mg of cation/

 kg,  the  acute  toxicities  are  in the following decreasing order:  PtCl,>
PdCl2'2H20, RuCl3>Pt(S04)2-4H20>MnCl2'4H20»Mn02, PbCl2> PbO.
     B.  Intraperitoneal inlection.  The summary of the lethal dose

studies following intraperitoneal injection are given in Table 2.  Values

are given for the LD-50, LD-10 and LD-90 and each parameter is expressed

in terms of mmoles/kg body weight, mg salt/kg body weight, and mg cation/

kg of body weight.

-------
      In terms  of  the  LD-50,  the acute  toxicities  (expressed  in molar




 quantities)  in decreasing order, were:   PtCl, >Pt(SO,)  '4H-0 (Goldsmith) >




   PdCl  -2H20>Pt(S04)2-4H20  (K and K Laboratories), MnCl2'4H20> PdSO, >





 PtCl2>  PbCl2.




      On a molar basis,  the LD-10 are in  the following decreasing order:




 PtCl4>  Pt(S04)2«4H20  (Goldsmith )>PdCl2*2H20>MnCl2-4H20, Pt(S04)2'4H20




 (K and  K)> PdS04> PbCl-.  This was exactly the same order as  the molar




 LD-50 values.




      The limiting dosages differentiating toxic and nontoxic  substances




 used  for inclusion of a substance in the Toxic Substances List (7) is




 2,000 mg/kg  following an intraperitoneal injection in rats.  According




 to this  standard, all of the tested compounds are "toxic" after in-




 traperitoneal  injection.




      If  the  LD-50 following  intraperitoneal injection is expressed in




 terms of mg  cation/kg body weight, the acute toxicities of the compounds




 decrease in  the following order:  PtCl4> MnCl2'4H20> PdCl2'2H20, Pt(S04)2«




 4H20  (Goldsmith)> Pt(S04)2-4H20 (K and K Lab), PdS04> PtCl2> PbCl2.




      The intraperitoneal LD-10 values, expressed in mg cation/kg body




weight, are  in essentially the same sequence as the eight most toxic




 compounds listed for the intraperitoneal LD-50 values.




     C.   Duration £f survival.  The rapidity of death in non-surviving




rats following oral administration varied widely.  For example, rats




receiving approximately the oral LD-50 survived for ^1.0 day, PtCl,,




Pt(S04)2'4H20; 1-2.5 days, RuCl3;  3.5-4 days, MnCl^I^O; or 5 days,




PdCl7*2H70.   For rats which received approximately the intraperitoneal




LD-50, the  non-surviving rats lived for^l.O day, MnCl2'4H20; 3.0-3.5




days, Pt(S04)2'4H20, PdCl2'2H20;  and 4.0-4.5 days,

-------
                        Table  2.
                        Lethal  Doses  Following  Intraperitoneal  Injection
  Compound
PtCl,
4H20
(K and K Lab)
(Goldsmith)
PdCl2'2H20
PdSO,
PbCl,
PtCl,
    Unit
(per kg body
  weight)
 mmoles
 mg salt
 mg cation
 mmoles
 mg salt
 mg cation
 mmoles
 mg salt
 mg cation
 mmoles
 mg salt
 mg cation
 mmoles
 mg salt
 mg cation
 mmoles
 mg salt
 mg cation
 mmoles
 mg salt
 mg cation
 mmoles
 mg salt
 mg cation
         LD-50
(95% confidence limits)
   0.11 (0.09-0.15)
   38 (29-50)
   22 (17-29)
   0.68 (0.60-0.76)
   310 (280-350)
   132 (117-149)
   0.70 (0.61-0.80)
   138 (120-159)
   38 (33-44)
   0.3-0.4
   138-184
   59-78
   0.57 (0.45-0.72)
   121 (95-154)
   60 (48-77)
   1.42 (1.11-1.81)
   290 (220-370)
   151 (118-193)
   8.5 (5.0-14.4)
   240 (1400-4000)
   1760 (1050-3000)
   2.5 (1.58-4.0)
   670 (420-1060)
   490 (310-770)
 LD-10     LD-90
             LD-90
             LD-10
  0.56
   260
   110
  0.56
   111
    31
0.2-0.3
92-138
39-59
  0.39
    84
    42
 (est.)
 (est.)
 (est.)
  1.6
   440
   330
    0.82
     380
     160
    0.87
     172
      48
  0.4-0.6
  184-280
  78-117
    0.82
     175
      87
0.77  1.8
156  370
82  195
    16.8
    4700
    3500
                                                                                 1.5
                                                                                 1.6
 2.1
 2.4
10

-------
     In rats which survived for 7 to 14 days after administration of doses which

were two-thirds or less of the oral or intraperitoneal LD-50, significant lack

of weight gain was noted during days 0-7 in rats receiving most of the compounds.

However, weight gain, (expressed in grams) was approximately the same in the
          the
treated and control rats during days 7-14 of the observation period.

     Two samples of Pt(SO,K'AH-O were tested in the intraperitoneal lethal

dose studies; one was purchased from ICN-K and K Laboratories and a second

sample from D. F. Goldsmith Chemical and Metal Corp.  The two samples differed

in their acute toxicities by approximately 2-fold.  It has not been possible

to identify the cause of the differences.

     Detailed data on the acute toxicities are given in the attached Appendix.

The data include the duration of survival by all animals and non-surviving

animals and the weight gain during the two weeks following metal administration

to the surviving animals.  Also included are the plots of the probits versus

log dose which were used in the method of Litchfield and Wilcoxon.(l) to

evaluate the LD-10 and LD-90 values.
                                   10

-------
IV.  METAL CONTENT OF VARIOUS TISSUES










           Analyses  for lead,  manganese and platinum were conducted by




      Yoakum,  Stewart  and Sterrett (5).  In a series of rats treated for




      90-91 days,  the  control  rats ingested approximately 0.15 g of




      manganese  (from  the solid  feed).   The tissue concentration of Mn




      was  1.4  and  1.0 pg  Mn/g wet  tissue in the liver and kidney,  respect-




      ively.   In Mn-treated  rats,  which received 8.3 mM MnCl .4H 0 as the




      drinking fluid and  ingested  approximately 2.3 g of Mn per rat




      during the 90-91  day interval,  the concentration of Mn was somewhat




      increased, namely 2.8  and  1.6 /ig  Mn/g of  wet tissue in the liver and




      kidney,  respectively.  The Mn concentration in spleen,  heart,  testes




      and blood  was not increased  in  the tissues  of Mn-treated  rats.




          A second group of rats  received  3.6  mM PbCl  in the  drinking




     water for  90-91 days and ingested  approximately 3  g of  lead  per rat




     during the interval; control rats  ingested  < 0.01  g of Pb in the




     solid feed during the same interval.  Kidney showed a marked  accumula-




     tion of Pb (to 11.1 pg Pb/g of wet tissue)  in  the  lead-treated  rats;




     in the same rats the concentration in liver  was  1.2 jig  Pb/g  of  wet




     tissue.   The corresponding levels in the control rats were approximately
                                    11

-------
 0.3 pg Pb/g of wet tissue in both kidney and liver.  The other



 tissues -- spleen, heart, testes and blood -- did not exhibit



 appreciably higher levels of Pb in the Pb-treated rats.



      Soluble Pt   salts were included in the drinking fluid of rats



 for 8-9 day intervals.   The approximate total Pt intake  (rag Pt per



 rat)  and data on the  tissue concentration of Pt in various tissues



 are presented in Table  3 .  Although the Pt concentrations in tissues



 of untreated control  rats often attain levels measurable by the



 technique used by Stewart Laboratories,  Inc.,  the levels are low



 and are generally less  than 0.1 jag Pt/g of wet tissue.   For the higher


             4+
 levels  of Pt   intake in the Pt-treated rats,  the highest tissue



 concentrations of Pt  occurred in the kidney and ranged from 4.5-5



;ug Pt/g of wet tissue.   High levels,  ranging from 0.7-2.5 ;jg Pt/g,



 also  occurred  in  the  liver.   In contrast,  brain showed only a very



 low level  of Pt which may reflect  a contribution from the blood.



 Separate  experiments  were conducted on the tissue concentrations  of



 Pt  in rats  which  received a saturated  solution of PtCl   as the
                                                      2


drinking  fluid  for 30-31  days.   In the PtCl«-treated  rats,  the mean



Pt  concentration  for  liver,  kidney and spleen  were <0.08/jg Pt/g



of wet  tissue.



     In Table 4 are presented the  Pt concentration of tissues



removed from rats  which had  survived for the  14-day observation



period  in  lethal-dose experiments.  The doses  of  Pt(SO )  .4H 0
                                                      42    2


administered by both  the  oral and  intraperitoneal  routes were



approximately 90% of  the  LD-50 values  by the respective  routes.
                                12

-------
      Table 3.   Pt content of tissues  of  rats  maintained on drinking
 fluid containing Pt salts.	
      Diet (drinking
      fluid)

      Pt salt concn.
        (mg Pt/lit)

      Duration of  diet
        (days)
      Total  Pt  intake    < 0.01
Control     Pt(S04)2.4H20
              106
319
               26
 80
           PtCl,
319
 60
Tissue Tissue concentration of Pt
(ug Pt/g wet tissue)
Liver 4. 0.02
+ 0.02
Kidney < 0.23
+ 0.45
Spleen 4 0.08
+ 0.08
Heart 4. 0.02
+ 0.01
Testes < 0.014
+ 0.010
Brain
Blood 0.10
+ 0.13
0.07
(0.04-
0.09)
0.26
± °-05
0.02
(0.01-
0.01)
0.02
0.04
+ 0.05
-
0.05
0.85
(0.73-
0.97)
4.6
(4.5-
4.7)
0.13
0.25
-
0.015
+ 0.002
0.22
(0.09-
0.36)
2.2
(2.0-
2.5)
4.8
+ 0.5
0.24
-
-
-
0.23
(0.19-
0.27)
     Control rats are those from diet experiments after approximately
8 or 30 days; 5-7 values for blood, spleen and heart, 13-16 values for
liver, kidney and testes..  +, standard deviation is given for means
with 4 values; ranges are indicated in parentheses for means of 2 values,
                                    13

-------
 Table 4.   Pt concentration in rat tissues following the
  administration of single high doses of Pt(SO, )2.4H20
Treatment
Route
Dose of Pt
(mg Pt/kg)
Tissue
Liver
Kidney
Spleen
Controls
Pt(S04)2.4H20
Oral Oral I. p.
382 113
Tissue Concentration of Pt
(ug Pt/g wet weight of tissue)
< 0.01
(0.004-0.006)
< 0.008
(0.004-0.004)
-£ 0.013
(0.007-0.011)
2.3 34
(1.2-3.5) (30-38)
16 37
(13-19) (28-46)
3.3 16
(2.3-4.2) (12-20)
      Heart

      Testes


      Brain


      Blood
    0.02

    0.011
(0.009-0.013)

    0.01
    0.008
    0.8
    0.5
3.0
1.2
(0.4-0.6)  (0.9-1.5)

    0.10      0.6
(0.07-0.14)(0.07-1.1)
    3.3
1.0
Range of 4 values for control liver,  kidney and spleen,
and range of 2-3 values of all other  tissues are given
in parentheses.  Control values are the mean values of
Pt concentration in 2 rats which received orally NaCl.
                                 14

-------
 During the two-week observation period, the rats gained weight at a




 rate from one-third to three-fourths the rate of the control rats.




 In the orally treated rats, the highest concentration of Ft occurred




 in the kidney (approximately 16 ug Pt/g) and appreciable levels of




 Pt also occurred in liver and spleen (range, 1-4 ug Pt/g of wet




 tissue).   In the intraperitoneably treated rats, the kidney, liver




 and spleen showed very high levels of Pt in the range of 10-40 ug




 of Pt/g of wet tissue.




      In a comparable  lethal Hose experiment,  rats were treated




 orally with a dose of MnCl .4H  0 equivalent to 100% of the oral




 LD-50  value and  the tissues were analyzed  in surviving rats at the




 end of the 14-day observation period.   In  contrast  to the  finding




 with the  Pt  salt,  the oral administration  of a single,  large but




 nonlethal  dose of MnCl.  .4H 0 to rats  did not  result in the retention
                      2    2


 after  14 days  of  excess concentrations  of Mn  in any of the  tissues




 analyzed  (Table 5).  Due  to low levels  of absorption and/or a




 high capacity  for  excretion of  the Mn,  the  tissue Mn levels of  the




 experimental rats were approximately equal  to  the levels found  in




 control rats.



                                                             4+
     These studies show that  in  rats treated with soluble  Pt




salts,  appreciable levels of  the metal can  be found  in the  kidney,




 liver and spleen.  Further  studies will  be  necessary  to determine  the




effects of the Pt and  other metals on various biochemical reactions.






 V.  ORGAN WEIGHTS




     Weights of five organs (liver, kidney,  spleen, heart and testes)




 were measured in rats  which had  been treated with various metallic
                               15

-------
         Table 5.  Mn concentrations  in rat tissues  following
     the oral administration of a single large dose  of
         Treatment      Controlsa
         Dose of Mn        —               416
         (rag Mn/kg)
         Tissue      Tissue Concentration of Mn
                     (ug Mn/g wet weight of tissue)
Liver
Kidney
Spleen
Heart
Testes
1.60
+ 0.87
0.75
+ 0.50
1.46
+ 1.99
0.55
+ 0.35
0.44
+ 0.35
1.9
(1.3-2.5)
1.3
(1.0-1.5)
1.3
(1.1-1.5)
0.7
0.5
(0.4-0.5)
         Brain            0.3            0.03

         Blood            0.86           0.4
                        -I- 0.44        (0.2-0.6)
     Control values are from rats treated orally.with NaCl, and rats on
diet experiments for approximately 8 or 30 days.  Means + standard
deviations are given for 6-7 samples of spleen, heart and blood and for
13-18 samples of liver, kidney and testes from control rats; ranges are
given in parentheses where two values are available from Mn-treated rats.
                                   16

-------
 salts  in  the diet  (either drinking fluid or solid feed).  The organ


 weights were expressed as the percentage of the body weight.  In the


 discussions which  follow, no consistent changes in organ weights occurred


 unless specifically noted.  In general, following treatment with most


 metallic  salts  (at the doses used) weight changes were not observed in


 liver, spleen and heart; several metals changed the kidney weight and a


 few salts changed  the testes weight.


     MnCl2'4H20.  MnCl2'4H20,  in the drinking fluid at 8.3 or 18.6


 mmoles/liter (1640 or 3690 mg/liter) for 90 days did not bring about


 major changes in organ weights, although there was some enlargement (12,


 13, and 8% above control; not statistically significant) in the spleen


 of all three experimental groups of animals.  None of the other organs


 of rats receiving MnClj^H^O in the drinking fluid showed consistent


 changes.


     PbCl2.  In rats which received 3.7 mmoles/liter (1022 mg/liter)


 for 30 days or for 90 days, the size of the liver was increased (6-12%


 above control; only one statistically significant) in three of the four


 experiments.  In contrast, the kidney size was increased in both the


 30-day dietary experiments (7% and 6% above control; not statistically


 significant)  and the 90-day experiments (17% and 23% above control;


 each statistically significant.)  Consistent changes in organ weights


were not noted in the cases of spleen, heart and testes although spleen


 showed increased size in two of four experiments.  In a single experi-


ment, PbCl2 (8.3 mmoles/liter or 2300 mg/liter) for 30 days caused 18%


and 25% (neither statistically significant) increases in kidney and


 spleen size, respectively.  The increase in kidney size due to treat-

            2+
ment with Pb   is consistent with the data by Hirsch (6) and by others.



     PdCl2 (anhydrous) and PdCL^^O.   Although the addition of Pdd2


 (anhydrous) to the feed (13.2 mmoles/kg or 2345 mg/kg; 30-days) caused

                                  17

-------
 changes  in several organ weights, the pattern was not consistent to that




 found in a second experiment.  The use of a saturated solution of PdCl.•




 2H«0 as  the drinking fluid  (8-days) also did not cause a consistent change




 in any of the organ weights.




     PdSO,.  The use of a saturated solution of PdSO, as the drinking fluid




 for 8 or 30 days did not cause a consistent pattern of changes in the organ




 weights  of the experimental rats.  In a single experiment in which solid




 PdSO, was added for 30-days to the feed at a level of 5.9 mmoles/kg feed




 (1.19 g  salt/kg feed), no changes were observed in organ weights; each rat




 received a mean of 3.8 mmoles of Pd salt (0.40 g of Pd) during the total




 diet period.




     PtCl,.  When this salt was added to the drinking fluid at 0.5 mmoles/




 liter (183 mg salt/liter) for 30 days or 90 days, or at 1.6 mmoles/liter




 (550 mg  salt/liter) for 8 days, no consistent changes were detected in the




weights of the five organs.  If the concentration was increased to 1.6 mmoles/




 liter (550 mg salt/liter) for 30 days or to 2.4 mmoles/liter (825 mg salt/




 liter) for 9 days, the weight of the kidneys were increased by approximately




 6% in each of 4 experiments but only two experiments gave p<0.1.




     In addition, in rats treated at the higher levels (1.6 mmoles/liter




 for 30 days or 2.4 mmoles/liter for 9 days), the testes were increased in




weight by approximately 11% in each of the 4 experiments but the difference




was statistically significant (p<0.05) in only one experiment.




     Pt(SO, )2'4H_0.  At a concentration of 1.6 mmoles/liter (750 mg salt/




 liter) in the drinking fluid in 8-9 day experiments, increased kidney




weight was observed in only one of 2 experiments and increased testes




weight (approximately 8%) was found in each of the two experiments but none




of the differences were statistically significant.
                                     18

-------
 VI.  DRUG METABOLISM IN VITRO
      Selection  o_f  substrates.  A wide variety of  substrates are metabo-
 lized by the  NADPH-dependent mixed  function oxidase system of hepatic
 microsomes.   The interaction of substrates with the cytochrome P-450
 may  produce one of  several  types of spectral changes.  Various substrates
 produce  a type  I spectrum which is characterized  by a peak at 385-390 nm
 and  a trough  at 419-425 nm; alternatively, other  substrates produce a
 type II  spectrum (trough at: 390-405 nm; peak at 426-435 nm) upon inter-
 action with cytochrome P-450 (8-10).  In the current study, it was con-
 sidered  desirable  to select: one representative substrate for each type
 of interaction with cytochrome P-450.  Consequently, in vitro drug
 metabolism studies  by  isolated hepatic microsomes were conducted with
 two  substrates:  the N-demethylase of aminopyrine, a type I substrate,
 and  the  p-hydroxylase of aniline, a type II substrate\ (11, 12).  How-
 ever,  the removal of one N-methyl group from aminopyrine yields a
 metabolite which has a type II spectrum and which is N-demethylated (11).
      The yield of microsomal protein (mg/g liver) found in this study is
 appreciably greater than the yield of approximately 20 mg/g liver reported
 in various publications for liver of fed rats.  The difference can be at-
 tributed predominantly to the fasting period of approximately 14 hours
 (range 13-15 hours) used before the removal of rat tissues in these
 studies.  For example, McLean and Day (13), using male Wistar rats
weighing approximately 150-250 g, the levels of microsomal protein
 (mg/g  liver) were 25 ± s.d. 2 and 38± s.d. 10 in  fed and 18-hour-fasted
 rats, respectively; the latter value is in close agreement with the
 yield of 40 ± s.d.  5 (15 groups) found in the livers of 14-hour-fasted,
 Sprague-Dawley rats in this study.  The control values obtained in these
experiments for the activities of aniline hydroxylase and aminopyrine
demethylase and for the content of cytochrome P-450 and cytochrome b5
are within the range of control values reported for male rats in various studies.
                                    IP

-------
     After experimental rats were maintained on metal-containing diets

 for approximately 8,  30 or 90 days, hepatic microsomes were  isolated

 and parameters  related to drug metabolism were measured.  Data on pre-

 sented  in Table 6.  Microsomal protein was expressed as mg microsomal

 protein/g liver; aniline hydroxylase activity, nmoles p-aminophenol pro-

 duced/mg microsomal protein/20 min; aminopyrine demethylase, nmoles form-

 aldehyde produced/mg  microsomal protein/ 10 min; cytochrome P-450 and

 cytochrome b5,  nmoles/mg microsomal protein.

     Treatment  with MnCl?-4H70 for approximately 90 days at  either 8.3

 mmoles  (1.6 g salt)/liter or 18.6 mmoles (3.7 g salt)/liter  did not ap-
                                               (Table 6A),
 pear to consistently  change any of the parameters^  Treatment with PbCl?

 at 3.7 mmoles (1.0 g  salt)/liter for 90 days or 8.3 mmoles (2.3 g salt)/

 liter for approximately 30 days did not affect recovery of microsomal

 protein or the  activity of aniline hydroxylase; for the other three para-

 meters, it was  not possible to detect a trend since data were obtained for

 only one experiment each.

     PdCl2'2H-0, a slightly soluble salt, was administered to rats as a

 saturated solution as the drinking fluid for 8 days and a marked decrease

was noted in the activities of aniline hydroxylase and aminopyrine demethy-
    (Table 6B),
       However, caution must be exercised in the interpretation of this
trend.  PdSO, , which is also a slightly soluble salt, was administered

as a saturated solution as the drinking fluid for 8 days or for approxi-

mately 30 days.  In each of these experiments no trend of changes was ob-
                                        (Table 6C),
served in the activities of the two enzymes »  At this time, it is not pos-

sible to explain the apparent differences as a result of the administration
                                    2+
the two slightly soluble salts of Pd
                                    20

-------
Table 6A.


Dietary
concn. ,
nxnoles
/liter
or kg
(mg salt
Metallic
Salt
MnCl7-
4H20^





MnCl7-
4H2(T




Dietary
Group
58
Control ,
paired
59
Un-
treated

62
Control,
Paired
63
Mn-
treated
/liter
or ka)



8.29
(1640)
/liter




18.65
(3690)
/liter
Mean
metal
consumption
/rat/
Days on diet
diet period
93 2.6
mmoles

93 40.3
mmoles
(2.2g Mn)

88 2.8
mmoles

88 71.8
mmoles
(3.9g Mn)
Microsomal
protein
(rag/8
liver)
45.9
±2.8

50.3
±3.4
m
109%
36.4
±0.8

36.2
±2.1
ns

Aniline
hydroxylase
14.5
±1.4

13.9
±0.4
ns

22.5
±1.1

24.0
±4.0
ns

Aminopyrine
d erne thy lase
62.2
±5.0

56.5
±6.9
ns

73.7
±6.0

75.0
±8.1
ns

Cytochrome
P-450
0.870
±0.046

0.812
±0.088
ns

0.750
±0.098

0.710
±0.060
ns

Cytochrome
b5
0.369
±0.026

0.326
±0.028
*
887.
0.389
±0.039

0.395
±0.037
ns

-------
Table 6B.


Metallic
Salt
PdCl2'2H20













Dietary
concn. ,
mmoles Mean
/liter metal
or kg consumption
(mg salt /rat/
Dietary /liter Days on diet
Group or kg) diet period
36 8
Control ,
paired
37 (satd. 8
Pd- soln.)
treated

31 8
Control ,
paired
30 . (satd. 8
Pd- soln.)
treated

Microsomal
protein
(mg/g
liver
45.4
±2.6

51.6
±4.1
m
113%
43.6
±3.6

41.8
±1.4
ns



Aniline
hydroxylase
14.2
±2.4

11.0
±1.8
m
77%
14.5
±0.5

9.7
±2.6
*
67%


Aminopyrine Cytochrome
demethylase P-450
57 .8 run
±1.0

52.0 nm
±3.4
*
90%
67 .7 nm
±4.9

44.9 nm
±8.9
**
66%


Cytochrome
b5
nm


nm



nm


nm




-------
  Table 6C.


Metallic
Salt
PdS04
*T







Dietary
Group
68
Control,
paired
69
Pd-
treated

Dietary
concn. ,
mmoles
/liter
or kg
(mg salt
/liter
or kg)



(satd.
soln.)


Mean
metal
consumption
/rat/
Days on diet
diet period
8


8



Microsomal
protein
(mg/g
liver
42.1
±1.9

42.5
±3.5
ns



Aniline
hydroxylase
15.0
±1.5

16,4
±2.1
ns



Aminopyrine Cytochrome
demethylase P-450
56 .3 nm
±3.6

49.4 nm
±6.9
ns
88%


Cytochrome
b5
nm


nm



   PdSO,
ho
U)
  60
Control,
paired

  61
  Pd-
treated
                         (satd.
                         soln.)
31
31
48.4
±2.3
19.1
±1.0
76.8
±8.4
 0.587
±0.083
 0.282
±0.017
47.2
±3.3
ns

17.3
±4.0
ns
90%
73.6
±15.0
ns

0.632
±0.049
ns

0.280
±0.023
ns


-------
                                     2+
     PtCl-, an "insoluble" salt of Pt  , was administered  to  rats as a



saturated solution as the drinking fluid for approximately 30 days.  No



consistent changes were observed  in the activities of aniline hydroxyl-



ase  and aminopyrine demethylase  although the former enzyme showed de-



creased activity in two of the three experiments (Table 6D).


           4+
     The Pt   salts, PtCl, and Pt(SO,)2'4H20, are very soluble and were



included in the drinking water.   A wide range of dosages and  durations



were used in the dietary experiments:  0.54 mmoles (183 mg PtCl,)/liter



for 30 and 90 days, and 1.6 mmoles (550 mg PtCl, or 750 mg Pt(SO,)'4H20/liter)



for 8 days and for 30 days (PtCl,  only).   Under none of the conditions



were consistent changes observed  in the level of the drug metabolizing



enzymes (aniline hydroxylase or aminopyrine demethylase), or  in the re-



covery of microsomal protein in the liver (Tables 6E, 6F).



     It is apparent that the activities of the two representative drug



metabolizing enzymes and amounts  of cytochromes P-450 and b5  are not


                                                 4+2+
extremely sensitive to lower levels of dietary Pt   and Pd  .  In order


                                       4+       2+
to administer in the diet sufficient Pt   and Pd   to affect  these para-



meters of drug metabolism, it will be essential or preferable to administer



the metallic salts in the solid feed rather than in the drinking fluid.



Obviously,  the use of higher doses of the insoluble or slightly soluble



salts will  require administration in the  solid feed.   Such studies are



currently in progress.
                                    24

-------
   Table 6D.
N>
Ui
Dietary
concn. ,
mmoles Mean
/liter metal
or kg consumption
(mg salt /rat/
Metallic Dietary /liter Days on diet
Salt Group or kg) diet period
PtCl2 7 31
Control ,
paired
8 (satd. 31
Pt- soln.)
treated

9 30
Control,
paired
11,12 (satd. 30
Pt- soln.)
treated

29 29
Control,
paired
28 (satd. 29
Pt- soln.)
treated
Microsomal
protein
(mg/g
liver
46.0
±3.2

43.9
±3.0
ns

55.0
±11.3

43.1
±3.0
m
787.
46.5
±3.1

44.6
±1.4
ns


Aniline
hydroxylase
16.3
±2.2

13.5
±1.4
m
83%
11.4
±1.3

8.3
±1.4
*
737,
16 .-0
±3.1

15.9
±2.3
ns


Aminopyrine Cytochrome
demethylase P-450
64 . 3 run
±20.7

63.9 nm
±17.6
ns

55.9
±14.3

81.6 nm
±13.7
*
1467.
80.1 nm
±16.9

73. 1 nm
±7.9
ns


Cytochronw
b5
nm


nm






nm



nm


nm



-------
Table 6E.


Metallic
Salt
ptci4





Dietary
Group
22
Control,
paired
23
Pt-
treated
Dietary
concn. ,
mmoles
/liter
or kg
(mg salt
/liter
or kg)


0.544
(183)
/liter
Mean
Metal
consumption
/rat/
Days on diet
diet period
30 0.00
mmoles

30 0.54
mmoles
(105 mg Pt)


Microsomal
protein
(mg/g
liver
41.1
±4.4

40.2
±3.1
ns


Aniline
hydroxylase
16.5
±3.5

15.5
±0.5
ns


Aminopyrine
demethylase
74.0
±16.1

76.3
±11.2
ns
                                                                                                 Cytochrome   Cytochrome
                                                                                                   P-450      	b5
                                                                                                     nm
                                                                                                     run
                                                                                                                  nm
20
Control ,
paired
21
Pt-
treated

0.544
(183)
/liter
                                  29
                                  29
                                  0.00
                                 mmoles
                                  0.47
                                 mmoles
                               (91 mg Pt)
                         41.7
                         ±3.7
                         40.8
                         ±3.2
                           ns
                              12.8
                              ±3.0
                              13.6
                              ±3.7
                                ns
                          64.8
                         ±10.4
                           70.6
                         ±22.0
                            ns
                                                                                                     nm
                                                                                                     nm
                                                                                                                  nm
                                                                                                                  nm
PtCl,
  52
Control,
paired

  53
  Pt-
treated
                       0.544
                       (183)
                       /liter
91
91
   0.00
  mmoles
   1.97
  mmoles
(384 mg Pt)
49.1
±4.9
46.7
±3.9
  ns
11.6
±1.2
14.3
±2.1
   m
123%
 55.7
±10.6
 63.4
 ±3.4
   ns
 114%
 0.790
±0.140
 0.763
±0.128
    ns
 0.324
±0.044
 0.348
±0.050
    ns

-------
Table 6F.


Metallic
Salt
ptci4








Dietary
Group
46
Control,
paired
47
Pt-
treated

Dietary
concn. ,
tnmoles
/liter
or kg
(mg salt
/liter
or kg)



1.63
(550)
/liter



Days on
diet
29


29



Mean
metal
consumption
/rat/
diet
period
0.00
mmoles

1.63
mmoles
(317 mg Pt)

Microsomal
protein
(mg/g
liver
39.5
±3.6

42.1
±2.7
ns



Aniline
hydroxylase
27.3
±2.0

25.3
±1.6
ns



Aminopyrine
demethylase
105.7
±9.5

104.3
±9.4
ns



Cytochrome
P-450
0.478
±0.031

0.575
±0.107
ns
120%


Cytochrome
b5
0.326
±0.027

0.324
±0.011
ns

N>
38
Control,
paired
39
Pt-
treated


1.63
(550)
/liter
                                  29
                                  29
                      0.00
                     mmoles
                      1.34
                     mmoles
                   (261 mg Pt)
                         45.6
                         ±1.2
                         42.6
                         ±8.4
                           ns
                               25.4
                               ±2.5
                               23.4
                               ±2.6
                                 ns
                           85.8
                           ±6.6
                           86.2
                          ±12.9
                             ns
                                                                                                      nm
                                                                                                      nm
                                                                                                                   nm
                                                                                                                   nm
             27
           Control,
           paired

             26
             Pt-
           treated
1.63
(550)
/liter
            29
29
          0.00
         mmoles
   1.27
  tnmoles
(248 mg Pt)
                  47.9
                  ±3.4
45.6
±2.6
  ns
             14.0
             ±1.3
15.0
±1.4
  ns
              76.6
              ±5.9
77.7
£7.7
  ns
                                                                                nm
                                                                    nm
                                                                                             nm
                                                                                 nm

-------
 VII.  STUDIES ON RNA SYNTHESIS IN VIVO




      Two major rRNA-containing peaks  resulted from centrifugation of




 resuspended hepatic  polysomes on a  sucrose gradient containing 0.1 M




 NaCl  and 0.001 M EDTA.   The  peaks had sedimentation coefficients  of




 approximately 27S and 43S.   ^260^280 ratios  °^  tne isoiated  peaks in-




 dicated  a greater content of protein  than in  corresponding  peaks  pre-




 pared from phenol-SDS or SDS-extracted rRNA.  When compared with  profiles




 of  phenol-SDS or  SDS-extracted rRNA,  material treated with  only EDTA




 and NaCl  exhibited greater homogeniety and/or tighter conformation.




 Increases  in gradient NaCl concentration  (0.25 M or 0.5 M)  resulted in




 additional  peaks, all having S values greater than 27S.  As indicated




 by  labeling studies  for  1 h  and 24 h, the  EDTA-NaCl  procedure was  com-




 parable  to  the  SDS extraction procedure for observation of  rRNA.   Ribo-




 somal RNA from  RNase-treated polysomes (5  mg  or  11 mg RNA/0.1 ug RNase)




 showed greater  structural integrity following EDTA-NaCl treatment  than




 following SDS extraction.  When compared with diethylpyrocarbonate as




a means of  improving  resolution of rRNA following RNase degradation of




polysomes,  the  EDTA-NaCl procedure gave equally  satisfactory results




with significantly greater convenience. A manuscript describing this




 study has been prepared.
                              28

-------
  VIII.   REFERENCES


  1.   Litchfield,  J.  T.,  and Wilcoxon, F.  A simplified method of evaluating
      dose-effect  experiments.   J.  Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 96:  99 (1949).

  2.   Imai,  Y.,  Ito,  A.,  and Sato,  R.   Evidence for biochemically different
      types  of vesicles  in the  hepatic microsomal fraction.   J. Biochem.
      (Tokyo) 6£:   417 (1966).

  3.   Chhabra, R.  S., Gram,  T.  E.,  and Fouts, J.  R.  A comparative study of
      two procedures  used in the determination of hepatic microsomal aniline
      hydroxylation.   Toxicol.  Appl.  Pharmacol.  22;   50 (1972).

  4.   Schenkman, J. B., Remmer,  H., and Estabrook, R. W.  Spectral studies
      of  drug interaction with  hepatic microsomal cytochrome.   Mol.  Pharmacol.
      3:   113 (1967).

  5.   Yoakum, A. M.,  Stewart, P.  L.,  and Sterrett, J. E.  Method development
      and subsequent  survey  analysis  of biological tissues for platinum, lead
      and manganese content.                 Environ.   Health Perspect.   (1975)


  6.   Hirsch, G. H.   Effect  of  chronic lead treatment on renal function.
      Toxicol. Appl.  Pharmacol.   .25:   84 (1973).

  7.   Christensen,  H.  E.   (ed.),  National Institute for Occupational Safety and
      Health Toxic Substances List. 1972 Edition (1972).

 8.  Schenkman,  J. B., Remmer,  H. and Estabrook,  R. W.  Mol. Pharmacol.,  3_,
     113-123 (1967).

 9.  Mannering,  G. J., Sladek,  N. E.,  Parli, C. J. and Shoeman,  D. W.   In
     Microsomes  and Drug  Oxidations (J. R.  Gillette e_t ajL.,  ed.).  Academic
     Press (1969).

10.  Hayes,  J.  R.  and Campbell,  T.  C.   Biochem. Pharmacol.,  2.3,  1721-1731 (1974).

11.  Correia, M. A. and Mannering,  G.  J. Mol.  Pharmacol., £,  470-485 (1973).

12.  Flynn,  E.  J., Lynch, M. and Zannoni, V. G.  Biochem.  Pharmacol., 21.  2577-
     2590 (1972).

13.  McLean, A.  E. M. and Day,  P. A.   Biochem.  Pharmacol., 23,  1173-1180  (1974).
                                            29

-------
X.  APPENDIX: DATA  ON  LETHAL  DOSE  LEVELS




     Values are the means (or weighted means) ± (upper) standard devia-


tions ± (lower) standard errors; the number of values is given in paren-


theses.  NA, not applicable or not applied.  In the column of "percentage


survival", the underlined values were used for the determination of the


LD-50, LD-10 and LD-90 doses by the method of Litchfield and Wilcoxon.


The standard deviations and standard error in the percentage survival


column are calculated from the products of the percentage survival and


the number of rats  in each experiment in which that dose was tested.


Statistical analyses (student's t-test) were applied only to weekly weight


gains:  ***, p<0.001; **, p<0.01; *, p<0.05; m, 0.05* p< 0.10; no mark-


ing used were p>0.10.  Percentage changes of the weight gains are indi-


cated only where p<0.10 or where the percentage was less than 90% or


more than 110% of the control values.

     a
      "Corrected value from Table 1 of Litchfield and Wilconon for meas-


ured 0% or measured 100% survival.


      "Expected value" was <0.01% or >99.99% by method of Litchfield and


Wilcoxon and not used in determination of lethal doses.

     £
      Value not used in determination of lethal doses.


      Value approximated by assumption of 0.25 survivors/number tested


where 0% survival was measured, and 0.25 non-survivors/number tested


where 100% survival was measured.
                                    30

-------
MnCl '4H20 / Intraperitoneal injection
Dose
(mg salt
/kg
body
weight) Expt.
Controls 21,25,
32,34


400 2,21,
25


200 2,21,
25


141.4 32,34





100 2,21,
25




50 21,25





Number
survivors
/number Percentage
tested survival
10/10 NA
100 .0
±0.0
±0.0
0/11 NA.b
o.'o
±0.0
±0.0
0/10 2.5d
0.0
±0.0
±0.0
4/12 33.3
33.3
±0.0
±0.0


11/11 97. 7d
100.0
±0.0
±0.0


11/11 NAb
lOO.'O
±0.0
+0.0


Duration of
survival (hr)
all
animals
336
±0
±0
(10)
2
±2
±1
(ID
8
±4
±1
(10)
120
±159
±46
(12)


336
±0
±0
(ID


336
±0
±0
(ID


non-
survivors
NA



2
±2
±1
(11)
8
±4
±1
(10)
12
±3
±1
(8)


NA





NA





Body
weight
(g) on
day 0
117
±8
±3
(10)
112
±12
±4
(11)
112
±9
±3
(10)
114
±13
±4
(12)


112
±8
±2
(11)


112
±8
±2
(11)


WL-l«h
days
0-7
63
±11
±3
(10)
NA



NA



18
±34
±17
(4)
*
29%
33
±19
±6
(9)
***
52%
45
±11
±3
(11)
**
71%
t K'-'in
days
0-14
110
±13
±4
(10)
NA



NA .



56
±57
±28
(4)
m
51%
81
±21
±7
(9)
**
74%
96
±15
±4
(ID
*
87%
(K)
days
7-14
48
±9
±3
(10)
NA



NA



38
±25
±12
(4)
ns
79%
48
±12
±4
(9)
ns

51
±12
±4
(11)
ns

                 31

-------
             MnCl_.4H70 / Intraperitoneal injection
                                                                                 ;«
                                                                               4
                                                                                 .  ...
                                                                                 w
                                                                        ±1;
                              tffi.l
                                                                      •:.$
                                                                                   tf
>  «
?  ti
a;  ^
oo
id

^  S
01
o
                                                                         I
                                                                              !!•
                              Efrf
                                                                                 •  B
                                  fti
               t
      :U'
                                                               J
                       ft
                                                                             :Ti
            fl.V
                                                                                 fe
          w
                                                                        ^
                             r
                                                                                   •t
                                                                               fl
                                                  •1
           Uri
           M
            2.0               2.1

    i.HAMri.lN UNI. NCI. C74 - PROBAI1IL ITY X OO
2.2
2.3
                                                                                   .10
                            Dose  (log)(mg salt/kg body weight)

                                          32

-------
/ Oral administration
Dose
(mg salt
/kg
body
weight) Expt.
Controls 5,8,
14,23


2500 1,5,
14,23


2000 5,8,
14,23


1750 8,14,
23


1500 5,8,
14,23




1250 1,8,
14,23




1000 5,8,
14,23




Number
survivors
/number Percentage
tested survival
14/14 NA



1/12 NA°
8.3
±15.1
±4.3
0/12 l.O3
0.0
±0.0
±0.0
2/12 16.7
16.7
±14.7
±4.2
6/12 50.0
50.0
±28.9
±8.3


10/11 90.9
90.9
±12.6
±3.8


12/12 99. 9a
100.0
±0.0
±0.0


Duration of
survival (hr)
all non-
animals survivors
336
±0
±0
(14)
40
±94
±27
(12)
22
±23
±7
(12)
106
±114
±33
(12)
213
±133
±38
(12)


307
±97
±29
(11)


336
±0
±0
(12)


NA



13
±11
±3
(11)
22
±23
±7
(12)
60
±43
±14
(10)
90
±48
±19
(6)


NA





NA





Body
weight
(g) on
day 0
107
±10
±3
(14)
109
±9
±2
(12)
103
±7
±2
(12)
109
±8
±2
(12)
103
±14
±4
(12)


111
±10
±3
(11)


105
±7
±2
(12)


Weight gain (g)
days days days
0-7 0-14 7-14
51
±10
±3
(14)
NA



NA



NA



22
±22
±9
(6)
**
43%
39
±25
±9
(7)
ns
76%
40
±19
±5
(12)
m
78%
100
±31
±8
(14)
NA



NA



NA



84
±26
±10
(6)
ns
84%
103
±26
±10
(7)
ns

99
±20
±6
(12)
ns

49
±23
±6
(14)
NA



NA



NA



62
±9
±3
(6)
m
127%
64
±10
±4
(7)
m
131%
59
±14
±4
(12)
ns
120%
   33

-------
               MnCl_.4H20 / Oral administration
>  "
3
(0
01
00
rt
4J


-------
MnO? / Oral administration
Dose
(mg salt
/kg
body
weight) Expt.
Controls 33,38



10,000 33,38





6,666 38





Number
survivors
/number Percentage
tested survival
6/6 MA
100.0
±0.0
±0.0
6/10 60.0
60.0
±0.0
±0.0


9/11 81.8
81.8




Duration of .
survival (hr) ^
all
animals
336
±0
±0

206
±168
±53
(10)


285
±113
±34
(11)


non- (g) on
survivors day 0
NA 99
±9
±4
(6)
11 103
±8 ±10
±4 ±3
(4) (10)


NA 99
±10
±3
(11)


Weight gain (g)
days
0-7
68
±11
±4
(6)
58
±15
±6
(6)
ns
85%
51
±18
±6
(9)
*
75%
days
0-14
128
±12
±5
(6)
120
±16
±6
(6)
ns

102
±44
±15
(9)
ns
80%
days
7-14
60
±7
±3
(6)
62
±6
±2
(6)
ns

50
±28
±9
(9)
ns
83%
            35

-------
         MnCL  / Oral administration
o





d """
 i M : I ; i i ' i
„ : T 	 j : 	 j i
*EE:TT : " !i .-•7\4.imi-it'--j:i^r^EE
j i [ i t -1 i
1 ! i F T ' 1
..... 	 	 J .+». .1. . ., . 	 	 	
lllLii.l Li ^ 	
X 3.7 3.8 3.9
T




r. '.' T - " : " " " *: r "; . ~ ~ i ;" z '. ~ ' ' ' '. . '. - ~"






\
t~ 1 I '




	 	 .. __ 	 	 	 j 	 _ 	 1 _._I|.. 	
4 -I 1
^ i
__ _ ^_ 4--t- -~TM
1
I i
j. ., _..,._(. a...
T i I X -C
:.::::";" "" :.:: :1"""}-

	 	 ._..„„ _ _ .... _; .. t
. j
._ 	 	 _. _ .j ^..j.....

tt^nTnrWffiif T mrrffii J n rf HI • f ' Fi-FtjlH-'f


	 . ,. j -, .j

4-t"1 1 } f
	 1 ; 1
	 	 	 i'" — !T 4 J
::."_::: 	 	 	 	 ~l .1 * • '" Tt"

- - 1 L 4 -T • i • i L
_ 	 	 . _ 	 l j ._ _l. |_1. .L . .

.. ^, f.j-t -[""'

..•-.-. ..T ;f::-::r"::::+!f--..:"yt }-?; r.
iii'" r'^tt ""^'--"pv-'-t, • > TI '{• ; '


^r 1 i ! ' i
- -^ . . .... - .j.J 1 .- . j. . .I-, ,. | J...

. • 	 T- T f j t ' t ; tj

:.":" ::::::: ""i"'i.f: — " '.:ii:. 1 \\\ d^rj'T
|_4V 	 -1 I J . .j-t— it-li (]1i^r_t

tt-l- l.L-14. |r.'4."4:
! L ^ ' if|

J .i^ ' ' 1 ) * 1


t :-:--t|-.---:::--.::::±-1--ri-iJ- : "t 1t-
• r • --t 	 T- 	 	 L ifij L! 11
" •" 	 " " 	 \'1\^ 	 if
...'.".... '""'.'.'.'.. ""..t; ' ' n I'JI"
•• t :- - -"-4 * 1 '1 4. i Ji^
1 -:::: 1 1 f. t '::- P". . fit j|tj.:
| t
it j 1 • ! . • i 5 T ;
"• : ."• "" f " 	 'i; '\ , !
j r ••- •{*•••*• 1 - - :; '
t \- -} ' '4 i J ' i

S'f- |?|:^r| i • JW-ijEdri::Stt:i||r||"
t L'"'iJ • L 4' ^L'ri
1 |lit; I | ) 1 ! t f ' 1
-it - - 4 i fu 4! U" i trun
t t r r ri --1 j |t trt'-H
1-il-L 1 Jl JLlLl llililL i . . i : I '
4.0 4.1
K




• o>
*i
OO
01















t"
T
1- °

r
i
i.
r




o




o
- *"


ro
"'

t •»
r
|

r *"



L o
t <•-
E
r:
r






:
|

ci
T e i
\
\
i *"*
Ho
1 „
^
l" -'
1
I
i ^
o
CHAMPION 1 INI. NO. U/.l - rK'OnAIMI I TV X 9O
                        Dose (log)(mg  salt/kg body weight)
                                       36

-------
PbCl, / Intraperitoneal injection
Dose
(mg salt
/kg
body
weight)
Controls



2083





1250





750





450





270





Expt.
12,21,
28,41,
48

28,41,
48




21,28,
41,48




12,21,
28,41,
48



12,21,
28,41




21,28





Number
survivors
/number Percentage
tested survival
13/13 NA
100.0
±0.0
±0.0
9/16 56.2
56.2
±14.3
±3.6


11/16 68.8
68.8
±27.1
±6.8


12/16 75.0
75.0
±29.8
±7.5


11/12 91.7
91.7
±12.3
±3.6


7/7 NA
100.0
±0.0
±0.0


Duration of
survival (hr)
all
animals
336
±0
±0
(13)
227
±130 .
±33
(16)


257
±126
±31
(16)


304
±74
±18
(16)


325
±39
±11
(12)


336
±0
±0
(7)


non-
survivors
NA



87
±39
±15
(7)


82
±63
±28
(5)


206
±101
±50
(4)


NA





NA





Body
weight
(g) on
day 0
111
±9
±3
(13)
101
±6
±2
(16)


110
±9
±2
(16)


106
±9
±2
(16)


111
±6
±2
(12)


116
±4
±2
(7)


Weight gain
days
0-7
55
±19
±5
(13)
30
±24
±8
(10)
*
55%
31
±18
±5
(12)
**
56%
27
±18
±5
(15)
fCyCK
49%
29
±25
±7
(12)
**
53%
29
±16
±6
(7)
**
53%
days
0-14
125
±17
±5
(10)
76
±36
±12
(9)
**
61%
63
±37
±11
(11)
***
50%
57
±37
±11
(11)
"K'ffff
46%
54
±44
±16
(8)
***
43%
74
±30
±11
(7)
**
59%
(g)
days
7-14
62
±11
±4
(10)
41
±21
±7
(9)
*
66%
31
±30
±9
(11)
**
50%
32
±16
±5
(11)
***
52%
28
±24
±9
(8)
**
45%
44
±16
±6
(7)
*
71%
             37

-------
          FbCl.  / Intraperitoneal  Injection

o


g " 	 • • • • - ~ 	 ; : _ : ; ; 	

o
CM
O

in
o



















d o I::::::::::..::;:::;:::;:::::;::::::::::;::::

> ::::::::::" 	 ::::::::~~:: :::::::::::::::
•H - 	 	 __
fc o:;:::;::;;::::::::;:::::::;::::::::::::::::::
3 ::::::::::. ::.::::::::::.::.: 	 ::_


M 	 	 __ _:::::: 	 	 	 - - -4
a g .::::.:.::::::::::::::::::::::...:..:::::;•:?

4) • II T^lb '
y ° II I^^H

(ii M]^ ' 111
QJ fiB I*
^i ^ '

::::"":: "i:::^::::::::::::"::::::::::::

° J^

B
^
1



S •: 	 : 	 : 	 ::::::; 	


$::::::-:--•- 	 ::::::::: 	 3





5 	
8!
«>!



« 	 	 	
8 2.6 2.8 3.0 3.2
8!
	 ' 	 s



. - . 	 	 . . . . . .
	 si

	 	 $



	 	 	 — T: 	
	 .._____ --------i~--------^--^-_- -"2~" 	 »>


	 s

	 _.._ ._ ">




_ m , Q


	 	 	 	 • 	 5-- 	 	 -
„__ 	 _ — __. — 	 _ .. - +. - _...-. 0
] i
*~
" ~ 	 : • ~ 	 • ~ " ^ j. ~t 	 " "


?

	 — j — g

4+-[' 	 	 	 	 T <*
^ ;::::::::::::: ::::::"i:: + :Trh-:-:i-
•H '
l!::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::p::E:E,
i j
: 	 	 : : 	 r • - 1 —
::::: :::: ::::: :..:::::± ::.:: 	 _i:±.:: o


• i
	 	 • • 	 	 	 	 ; vt
	 -i-t--rr}-- s
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 - - - - ..j -j- —
_ __. .__-_ .__ 	 	 	 ... 	 	 	 - ,-I.J - . .-,. 	
	 	 	 --•----• 1- 	
.;;;; .~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~. ;.. 	 L.;J;;;: ;.x.;_;;" =>
	 	 i
.....





i
— 	 - 	 	 	 - 	 	 • • -i —
"; 	 	 ' ~ _. - ; ~ : 	 " 	 ~ • " 	 t" 	
' _£~ '

.
i/>
1 O

_i_ csl
0

• 1 (Tf 1 lllllTfl flfllllll (III lll'IIIIIHflTI8
T

r-»
3.4 3.6 rf
CHAMPION LINE NO. 674 - PROBABILITY X QO
                       Dose (log) (ing salt/kg body weight)
                                      38

-------
PbCl, / Oral administration
Dose
(mg salt
/kg
body
weight) Expt.
Controls 51

9645 51



5787 51



Number
survivors
/number
tested
2/2

9/10



9/10



Duration of .
survival (hr) ^
v ' weight
Percentage
survival
NA
100.0
90.0
90.0

1
90.0
90.0


all
animals
NA

305
±97
±31
(10)
325
±35
±11
(10)
non- (g) on
survivors day 0
NA NA

NA 118
±12
±4
(10)
NA 116
±10
±3
(10)
Weight gain (g)
days
0-7
NA

44
±13
±4
(9)
54
±27
±9
(10)
days
0-14
NA

107
±12
±4
(9)
115
±31
±10
(9)
days
7-14
NA

63
±5
±2
(9)
55
±14
±5
(9)
              39

-------
PbO / Oral administration
Dose
(mg salt
/kg
body
weight) Expt.
Controls 33,39



10,000 33,39





6,666 39





Number
survivors
/number Percentage
tested survival
6/6 NA
100.0
±0.0
±0.0
7/11 63.6
63.6
±15.7
±4.7


6/9 66.7
66.7




Duration of
survival (hr)
all
animals
336
±0
±0
(6)
217
±165
±50
(11)


228
±161
±54
(9)


non-
survivors
NA



9
±4
±2
(4)


13
±4
±2
(3)


Body
weight
(g) on
day 0
105
±6
±2
(6)
103
±10
±3
(11)


97
±4
±1
(9)


Weight gain (g)
days
0-7
64
±15
±6
(6)
32
±19
±7
(7)
**
50%
44
±12
±5
(6)
*
697»
days
0-14
106
±33
±13
(6)
96
±15
±6
(7)
ns

105
±14
±6
(6)
ns

days
7-14
43
±18
±7
(6)
64
±8
±3
(7)
*
149%
61
±12
±5
(6)
m
142%
            40

-------
              PbO  /  Oral administration
0)
o
                                                                                     ..	h_.. o
     CHAMPION LINE
                                3.8
                 NO. 674 - PROBABILITY X 9O
4.0
                              Dose (log)(mg salt/kg body weight)

                                              41

-------
PdCl2'2H20 / Intraperitoneal Injection
Dose
(mg salt
/kg
body
weight) Expt.
Controls 17,24,
37


279 17,24



186 17,24,
37


124 17,24,
37




82.7 24,37




55.1 24,37




Number
survivors
/number Percentage
tested survival
8/8 NA
100.0
±0.0
±0.0
0/5 NA
0.0
±0.0
±0.0
1/11 9.1
9.1
±8.7
±2.6
4/11 36.4
36.4
±19.5
±5.9


11/11 92. 6a
100.0
±0.0
±0.0

11/11 NA
100.0
±0.0
±0.0

Duration of
survival (hr)
all
animals
336
±0
±0
(8)
17
±6
• ±3
(5)
59
±94
±28
(11)
172
±138
±42
(11)


336
±0
.±0
(11)

336
±0
±0
(11)

non-
survivors
NA



17
±6
±3
(5)
32
±22
±7
(10)
78
±58
±22
(7)


336
±0
±0
(11)

336
±0
±0
(11)

Body
weight
(g) on
day 0
97
±7
±2
(8)
95
±6
±2
(5)
96
±5
±2
(ID
101
±4
±1
(11)


98
±8
±2
(11)

97
±5
±2
(11)

Weight gain (g)
days
0-7
60
±8
±3
(8)
NA



NA


*
33
±19
±9
(5)
*
55%
59
±8
±2
(11)
ns
57
±11
±3
(11)
ns
days
0-14
118
±15
±5
(8)
NA



NA



86
±8
±4
(4)
***
73%
119
±11
±3
(11)
ns
116
±21
±6
(ID
ns
days
7-14
57
±9
±3
(8)
NA



NA



46
±6
±3
(4)
*
81%
60
±8
±2
(11)
ns
59
±13
±4
(ID
ns
                  42

-------
               PdCl2.2H-,0  /  Intraperitoneal injection
OJ
c
0)
P..     :::.
                 1.9      2.0

CHAMPION UNIi NO. 074 - PROS AIM I ITY X 9O
                                        2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
                              Dose (log)(mg  salt/kg body weight)

                                           43

-------
PdCl2-2H20 / Oral administration
Dose
(mg salt
/kg
body
weight) Expt.
Controls 15,16,
18,25


1410 16,18,
25


940 15,16,
18,25


627 15,16,
18,25




• 418 15,16,
18,25




279 15,16
18,25




186 15





Number
survivors
/number Percentage
tested survival
9/9 NA
100.0
±0.0
±0.0
0/11 2.2a
0.0
±0.0
±0.0
2/11 18.2
18.2
±31.2
±9.4
5/11 45.5
45.5
±32.6
±9.8


7/10 70.0
70.0
±29.2
±9.2


11/11 96. 2S
100.0
±0.0
±0.0


3/3 NA
100.0




Duration of
survival (hr)
all
animals
336
±0
±0
(9)
58
±57
±17
(ID
125
±108
±32
(11)
213
±130
±39
(ID


276
±100
±32
(10)


336
±0
±0
(11)


336
±0
±0
(3)


non-
survivors
NA



58
±57
±17
(ID
79
±31
±10
(9)
110
±76
±31
(6)


136
±52
±30
(3)


NA





NA





Body
weight
(g) on
day 0
108
±13
±4
(9)
109
±11
±3
(11)
102
±11
±3
(11)
106
±8
' ±3
(11)


103
±8
±3
(10)


107
±11
±3
(11)


98
±5
±3
(3)


Weight gain
days
0-7
57
±8
±3
(9)
NA



NA



14
±23
±9
(6)
***
257,
11
±20
±7
(8)
***
357o
37
±28
±8
(11)
*
65%
49
±10
±6
(3)
ns
86%
days
0-14
115
±13
±4
(9)
NA



NA
•


69
±31
±14
(5)
**
60%
57
±40
±15
(7)
**
50%
89
±30
±9
(11)
*
77%
106
±14
±8
(3)
ns

(8)
days
7-14
59
±9
±3
(9)
NA



NA



51
±13
±6
(5)
ns
86%
42
±23
±9
(7)
m
71%
52
±9
±3
(11)
ns
887,
57
±4
±3
(3)
ns

              44

-------
             PdCl2.2H20 / Oral adminiatration
                                                                               &
                                                                          ;>f
                                -fl
                                                                              iB
                                                                          ±it
5  s
•H


B  o
3  §
ca

-------
PdO / Oral administration
Dose
(mg salt
/kg
body
weight) Expt.
Controls 33,54



10,000 33,54





Number
survivors
/number
tested
5/5



6/6





•
Percentage
survival
NA
100.0
±0.0
±0.0
100.0
100.0
±0.0
±0.0


Duration
survival
- all
of
(hr)
non-
animals survivors
336
±0
±0
<5>
336
±0
±0
(5)


NA



NA





Body
weight
(8) on
day 0
108
±7
±3
(5)
103
±13
±5
(6)
ns

Weight gain
days
0-7
69
±12
±5
(5)
50
±18
±7
(6)
m
72%
days
0-14
130
±10
±4
(5)
98
±35
±14
(6)
m
75%
(8)
days
7-14
62
±7
±3
(5)
48
±17
±7
(6)
ns
77%
           46

-------
PdSO,  / Intraperitoneal injection
Dose
(mg salt Number
/kg survivors
body /number Percentage
weight) Expt. tested survival
Controls 22,40, 9/9 NA
47 100.0
±0.0
±0.0
450 40 0/4 NA
0.0


300 40,47 5/10 50.0
50.0
±21.5
±6.8


245 47 5/9 55.6
55.6




200 22,40, 8/10 80.0
47 80.0
±17.2
±5.4


133.3 22,40 4/4 NA
100.0
±0.0
±0.0


Duration of
survival (hr)
all
animals
336
±0
±0
(9)
52
±52
±26
(4)
219
±127
±40
(10)


245
±114
±38
(9)


294
±88
±28
(10)


336
±0
±0
(4)


non-
survivors
NA



52
±52
±26
(4)
101
±40
±18
(5)


132
±60
±30
(4)


NA





NA





Body
weight
(g) on
day 0
107
±4
±2
(9)
101
±6
;±3
(4)
103
±7
±2
(10)


110
±10
±3
(9)


105
±6
±2
(10)


104
±13
±6
(4)


Weight gain (g)
days
0-7
62
±10
±3
(9)
NA



44
±10
±4
(5)
**
717.
38
±16
±7
(6)
**
61%
31
±16
±6
(8)
***
50%
34
±21
±10
(4)
*
55%
days
0-14
126
±19
±6
(9)
NA



89
±39
±17
(5)
m
71%
86
±33
±15
(5)
*
68%
75
±34
±12
(8)
**
60%
90
±33
±17
(4)
m
71%
days
7-14
64
±12
±4
(9)
NA



45
±30
±13
(5)
ns
70%
46
±18
±8
(5)
m
72%
44
±25
±9
(8)
m
69%
56
±14
±7
(4)
ns
88%
              47

-------
                     / Intraperitoneal injection
3
OJ

-------
Ptd2 / Intraperitoneal injection
Dose
(mg salt
/kg
body
weight) Expt.
Controls 18,52
53


1111 52,53



741 52,53





578 52,53





450 18,53





250 18,53





Number
survivors
/number Percentage
tested survival
6/6 NA
100.0
±0.0
±0.0
1/4 NA
25.0
±16.6
±8.3
3/9 33.3
33.3
±18.9
±6.3


3/6 50.0
50.0
±38.7
±15.8


9/10 90.0
90.0
±5.3
±1.7


8/10 80.0
80.0
±10.5
±3.3


Duration of
survival (hr)
all
animals
336
±0
±0
(6)
89
±165
±82
(4)
151
±167
±56
(9)


175
±177
±72
(6)


307
±91
±29
(10)


329
±18
±6
(10)


non-
survivors
NA



7
±6
±3
(3)
58
±118
±48
(6)


13
±21
±12
(3)


NA





NA





Body
weight
(g) on
day 0
104
±24
±10
(6)
108
±21
±11
(4)
112
±12
±4
(9)


107
±8
±3
(6)


117
±12
±4
(10)


117
±16
±5
(10)


Weight gain (g)
days
0-7
66
±18
±7
(6)
NA



6
±23
±12
(4)
**
97,
16
±12
±7
(3)
**
24%
39
±16
±5
(9)
**
59%
53
±11
±3
(10)
ns
80%
days
0-14
124
±17
±7
(6)
NA



53
±52
±30
(3)
m
43%
58
±27
±15
(3)
**
47%
100
±25
±8
(9)
*
81%
107
±21
±7
(8)
ns
86%
days
7-14
57
±4
±2
(6)
NA



46
±24
±14
(3)
ns
81%
43
±15
±9
(3)
ns
75%
61
±12
±4
(9)
ns

56
±12
±4
(8)
ns

             49

-------
PtCl,  / Intraperltoneal Injection
Dose
(mg salt
/kg
body
weight) Expt.
Controls 42,45,
50


108 42,45



64.8 42,45,
50


38.9 45,50



23.3 45,50





14.0 45





Number
survivors
/number Percentage
tested survival
6/6 NA
100.0
±0.0
±0.0
0/6 NA
0.0
±0.0
±0.0
1/10 10.00
10.0
±12.2
±4.1
2/10 20.00
20.0
±0.0
±0.0
10/10 97. 5d
100.0
±0.0
±0.0


5/5 NA
100.0
±0.0
±0.0


Duration of
survival (hr)
all
animals
336
±0
±0
(6)
0
±0
±0
(6)
34
±106
±34
(10)
107
±123
±39
(10)
336
±0
±0
(10)


336
±0
±0
(10)


non-
survivors
NA



0
±0
±0
(6)
1
±0
±0
(9)
50
±29
±10
(8)
NA





NA





Body
weight
(g) on
day 0
95
±12
±5
(6)
105
±7
±3
(6)
101
±9
±3
(10)
100
±6
±2
(10)
100
±9
±3
(10)


102
±8
±3
(5)


Weight gain
days
0-7
61
±6
±3
(6)
NA



NA



NA



22
±22
±7
(10)
***

57
±11
±5
(5)
ns

days
0-14
120
±11
±5
(6)
NA



NA



NA



87
±26
±8
(10)
**
73%
96
±6
±3
(5)
**
80%
(8)
days
7-14
59
±7
±3
(6)
NA



NA



NA



62
±14
±4
(10)
ns

38
±11
±5
(5)
**
647,
               50

-------
PtCl,  / Oral administration
Dose
(mg salt
/kg
body
weight) Expt.
Controls 31,43,
46


660 29



440 29,46



293,3 31,43,
46




195.6 31,43,



130.4 31,43,
46


36.9 31,43



Number
survivors
/number Percentage
tested survival
7/8 NA
87.5
±23.1
±8.2
0/6 NA
0.0


1/9 11.11
11.1
±10.5
±3.5
4/10 40.0
40.0
±22.0
±6.9


8/10 80.0
80.0
±18.3
±5.8
7/10 70.0
70.0
±31.6
±10.0
2/3 NA
66.7


Duration of
survival (hr)
all
animals
310
±72
±26
(8)
0
±0
±0
(6)
38
±112
±37
(9)
140
±170
±53
(10)


270
±138
±44
(10)
236
±162
±51
(10)
240
±166
±96
(3)
non-
survivors
NA



0
±0
±0
(6)
1
±3
±1
(8)
9
±10
±4
(6)


NA



1
±0
±0
(3)
NA



Body
weight
(g) on
day 0
100
±15
±5
(8)
98
±9
±4
(6)
100
±6
±2
(9)
109
±10
±3
(10)


103
±12
±4
(10)
102
±9
±3
(10)
106
±15
±9
(3)
Weight gain (g)
days
0-7
65
±18
±7
(7)
NA



NA



16
±38
±19
(4)
*
25%
NA



57
±13
±5
(7)
NA



days
0-14
108
±35
±13
(7)
NA



NA



81
±34
±17
(4)
ns
75%
NA



115
±22
±8
(7)
NA



days
7-14
44
±29
±11
(7)
NA



NA



65
±14
±7
(4)
ns
148%
NA



58
±22
±8
(7).
NA



             51

-------
               PtCl,  /  Oral administration
O 1


in 	 " — - - - - - — — -_, _
0 - 	 	 	 	 	 	 -.._-__
o -1 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 •- 	 	
0
N T
o

« '
c .

- J~ • -I t - - " • - 	 	 - 	 • - • 	 ~
— 	 	 	 	 	 -X-. 	 . . 	


	 	 . _ 	



j


j
O ._ _ «.___ . -Bnv-r.n.




8 -£---»- 	






~~i i

O m _ _ _ ._._ _..__-.__-_
^ 	 .. _. ,. . . -J 	 	 . 	 	 J 	 	

0 - t- - 	 - - - - \~ 	 	 	 - - - 	 	 f- - - -J 	
10 - • , *~-..--- — — • • ~tl • • •» ~ ~ 	
- - — - - - 	 • + - - 	 - - 	 —
S " • • f • •' ' 1_ " i


0 - -- - • - j 	 i" i £~ ' ~ " _>'* —
.- - : .lit:. "'--•Ju,!*' :i-::|-
o \ 	 > i - - - 4 ----- ^ j^fl 	 J
t- -- - 	 	 fl 	 - - t - --£
.i. . 1 ^'. 	 	 	 	

„
01 ' i
i "
» 	 1 	 j 	 _-j 	 	 J 	 	



en

..... . ......
........ ... . . .
»!
& 1
---..,[_. ~ . . . . _ . . _
-------



* 1
8 2.0 2.1 2.2 2



	 ... . _ „ 	 	 ..-_.._ 	 _ 	
"•" ri




L. __ L _i

• - - 4- 	 	 	 ._.-.. 	 T . _| ..__...... j. i
. 	 ....._. 	 	 	 ~F~~ i? — — "1" ' i ' •
T . ^ T ! | 1 i i

	 	 .. 	 	 _., 	 	 , 	 .... lj~ . 	 	 . , -I. }. L
al
it 1 1
-...L:.
i Ti

|| {
11 T T~L • 4 ^
i \ II [ i



:::::: ::::::-;_;:i|.:l:;;i::.:±±g|. ^Iti
IHttllttffrrm
1 ^ ' i • 1 1
! ' "* ' ! i
.* * i r i
1 ^ ! 1 !


{ > ^ .

.._-,._ __ . r 4 3| j . -1-. _I .._„.( |
	 -_^c_JEB__ 	 j 	 .. .. — I 	 1 -i
^1 i
	 .>' 	 	 -4- ------ 	 	 ±4 i
:::::;^::-;-::--::----Hr 	 \L\ ---ti "
::;ef:-::- 	 	 ].:|4::.tti. ...... .1 u. j: j

i 	 	 	 	 i -| 	 J. .-) I . j. j- . . _ L 1 4. . ».
.'.'.'i'.." .. ~~ — t r T ' ' "t 't ' ' • r "r ~ "
-— ••- 	 p--:.-::jr:jj±- -ft n J 4. -

J - 	 	 - - 	 	 -l\ - -J4T1- - - -j-t| i-| i .. ;-
:r:C:Er:::EEE:EL = ETr-ji-±4±f:.-'f nf[ ' r
-- •-- 	 I'li^'jl j T
i. : ....".-. ....IE 	 ~:. "- ". *
1. tr r- -I
	 	 	 	 . 	 	 	 , i!
-t -i i- 4-i '
I I 1 1 1 _4 IL IT ]


., 	 . 	 L .( -j-- • 	 1 	 j - ---H-
- 	 - ...^.. -. --- .4 -j__.| 	 j-(. . .4 4 . . . j-i-j.

•-•- 	 - 	 F- 	 4- 444 -•-••} ^t-f- 41-,-
— 	 1 - ---t^-fr -- ..' u 	
i 	 	 iii . . j . i ;

..-(.. 4 - 4 144- J- -144- - 4 .14.. .1
t_i

. 4. L
i ^ i
i i * t
.. _ ^ 	 	
^- ->L- i i i t
.3 2.4 2.5 2.6 2.7











i !





i


1

1











1 1


| 1
"1

i-.4



-j j

•• H
:.(-;
.l|i
•*-• -f
- • • i
txt
*

i 1
M
i|
d-:+
T •-


ffi
-M

ii!
•j
1 1
. -





o>



-: o>
00
0,








_ -
-- S

*n




-.0




O



r p^
J ' '"*

"T

"1"



T •"
I
4- o


+' 0

L
4:
"•" o



!
i
4-



^
t- «
T c
i
!
I -
-I °
t *!
T •

I
„
°
3
to
4J
C
01
u
     CHAMPION LINE NO  674 - PROBABILITY

                              Dose
X 90

 (log)(mg salt/kg body weight)

          52

-------
PtO« / Oral administration
Dose
(mg salt
/kg
body
weight) Expt.
Controls 9,20,
33,51


8000 9,33,
51,52



4444 20,52





Number
survivors
/number Percentage
tested survival
9/9 NA
100.0
±0.0
±0.0
5/7 71.4
71.4
±48.8
±18.4

5/6 83.3
83.3
±12.9
±5.3


Duration of ,
survival (hr) . ^
v weight
all
animals
336
±0
±0
(9)
253
±143
±54
(7)

326
±25
±10
(6)


non- (g) on
survivors day 0
NA 106
±16
±5
(9)
NA 118
±11
±4
(7)

NA 115
±21
±9



Weight gain
days
0-7
66
±20
±7
(9)
68
±15
±7
(5)
ns
62
±18
±7
(6)
ns

days
0-14
117
±35
±12
(9)
114
±17
±8
(5)
ns
106
±36
±16
(5)
ns
90%
(g)
days
7-14
ril
±18
±6
(9)
47
±10
±4
(5)
ns
37
±28
±13
(5)
ns
7370
             53

-------
                 Pt(SO,)2'4H20 /  Intraperitoneal  Injection
Dose
(mg salt
/kg
body
weight)
Controls



600



400



326.6



267





178





Expt.
14,22,
24,32,


14,22,
24


14,22,
24


32, 3'4



14,22,
24




14,22,
24




Number
survivors
/number Percentage
tested survival
16/16 NA
100.0
±0.0
±0.0
0/10 NAb
0.0
±0.0
±0.0
1/11 9.1
9.1
±20.2
±6.1
2/12 16.7
16.7
±0.0
±0.0
10/11 90.9"
90.9
±8.7
±2.6


11/11 NAb
100.0
±0.0
±0.0


Duration of
survival (hr)
all
animals
336
±0
±0
(16)
28
±16
±5
(10)
67
±92
±28
(11)
117
±106
±31
(12)
308
±93
±28
(11)


336
±0
±0
(11)


non-
survivors
NA



28
±16
±5.
(10)
41
±23
±7
(10)
73
±31
±10
(10)
NA





NA





Body
weight
(g) on
day 0
106
±10
±3
(16)
100
±4
±1
(10)
102
±11
±3
(11)
108
±11
±3
(12)
101
±8
±2
(11)


104
±11
±3
(11)


Weight gain (g)
days
0-7
59
±7
±2
(16)
NA



NA



NA



39
±17
±5
(10)
**
66%
36
±14
±4
(11)
***
61%
days
0-14
114
±14
±4
(16)
NA



NA



NA



96
±26
±8
(10)
m
84%
94
±32
±10
(11)
m
82%
days
7-14
55
±13
±3
(16)
NA



NA



NA



56
±11
±3
(10)
ns

58
±21
±6
(11)
ns

  4+
Ft   salt obtained from ICN/K and K Laboratories
                                   54

-------
               Pt(SO,)2.4H-0 / InfcrapiBsritoneal injaction
                                                                                      T
3
0)
0)
60
CO
4-1

V

a
                                                                                  1 M

             2.4                2.5

     CHAMPION LINE NO. 674 - PROBABILITY X 9O
2.6
                             Dose (log)(mg  salt/kg body weight)

-------
           pt(so4).
•4H20 (Goldsmith) / Intraperitoneal injection
Dose
(mg salt
/kg
body
weight) Expt.
Controls 56,57



400 55



267 55,56
57


119 56,57





52.7 56





Number
survivors
/number Percentage
tested survival
4/4 NA
100.0
±0.0
±0.0
1/3 NA
33.3


0/7 3.6d
0.0
±0.0
±0.0
6/7 85.7
85.7
±17.8
±6.7


4/4 NA
100.0




Duration of
survival (hr)
all
animals
336
±0
±0

114
±167
±96
(3)
76
±13
±5
(7)
307
±78
±29
(7)


336
±0
±0
(4)


non-
survivors
NA



NA



76
±13
±5
(7)
NA





NA





Body
weight
(g) on
day 0
105
±18
±9
(4)
121
±16
±9
(3)
112
±13
±5
(7)
114
±7
±3
(6)


120
±18
±9
(4)


Weight gain (g)
days
0-7
52
±12
±6
(4)
NA



NA



8
±31
±13
(6)
*
16%
56
±16
±8
(4)
ns

days
0-14
106
±15
±8
(4)
NA



NA



56
±34
±14
(6)
*
52%
117
±24
±12
(4)
ns

days
7-14
54
±5
±2
(4)
NA



NA



47
±19
±8
(6)
ns
88%
61
±9
±4
(4)
ns
113%
  4+
Ft   salt obtained from D. F. Goldsmith Chemical and Metal Corp.
                                 56

-------
/ Oral administration
Dose
(mg salt
/kg
body
we igh t )
Controls



2025



1350



900





600





400





Expt.
14,16,
23,25


14,16,
23,25


14,16,
23,25


14,16,
23,25




14,16,
23,25




14,16,
23




Number
survivors
/number Percentage
tested survival
11/11 NA
100.0
±0.0
±0.0
1/10 10.0
10.0
±31.6
±10.0
1/10 10.0
10.0
±31.6
±10.0
5/10 50.0
50.0
±45.1
±14.3


9/10 90.0
90.0
±16.1
±5.1


7/7 99. 83
100.0
±0.0
±0.0


Duration of
survival (hr)
all
animals
336
±0
±0
(ID
46
±104
±33
(10)
43
±103
±33
(10)
172
±173
±55
(10)


307
±92
±29
(10)


336
±0
±0
(7)


non-
survivors
NA



13
±24
±8
(9)
11
±10
±3
(9)
8
±4
±2
(5)


NA





NA





Body
weight
(g) on
day 0
106
±12
±3
(ID
109
±13
±4
(10)
109
±11
±3
(10)
109
±10
±3
(10)


108
±11
±3
(10)


109
±7
±3
(7)


Weight gain
days
0-7
50
±8
±2
(11)
NA



NA



27
±33
±15
(5)
ns
54%
37
±25
±8
(9)
ns
74%
52
±15
±6
(7)
ns

days
0-14
108
±16
±5
(11)
NA



NA



78
±48
±21
(5)
ns
72%
106
±17
±6
(9)
ns

116
±20
±8
(7)
ns

(8)
days
7-14
58
±11
±3
(ID
NA



NA



51
±19
±8
(5)
ns
88%
70
±29
±10
(9)
ns

64
±6
±2
(7)
ns
110%
 57

-------
            Pt(SO^)2.4H20 / Oral administration

                                                               t-

                                                                   ft
                                                                        •!t-
                                                                        ii:
CO

•H
01
00
cd
                                         1 .
                                                                ITffii
                                                                     -m
                                                                uit
                                                               tnr
                                                           t
                                                            •t-
                                                                       41 r
                                                                       t ti:
       --
         •fir
                                                                 I
                                                                       :Hi
                                                                ™
                                                                        i .t:
                                                                       -4-l-t
                                                               •i-rf-

                                                               *T
                                                                   + :Hllif.
                                                                -h^
                                                                 rr
                                                                    tit
                                                                       i\
                                                                   iR
s       2.6     2.7     2.8

 CHAMPION LINE NO. 674 - PROBABILITY X 90
                                  2.9
                                          3.0
3.1
3.2
3.3
                         Dose (log)(mg salt/kg body weight)

                                    58

-------
RuCl, / Oral administration
Dose
(mg salt
/kg
body
weight) Expt.
Controls 4,7,
35,36


1350 35,36



900 35,36





600 7,35,
36




400 4,7,
35,36




200 4

Number
survivors
/number Percentage
tested survival
8/9 NA
88.9
±22.0
±7.3
0/11 4.8a
0.0
±0.0
±0.0
3/11 27.3
27.3
±12.2
±3.7


5/12 41.7
41.7
±28.9
±8.3


12/12 90. la
100.0
±0.0
±0.0


2/2 NA
100.0
Duration of
survival (hr)
all
animals
335
±4
±1
(9)
36
±16
±5
(11)
139
±132
±40
(11)


150
±164
±47
(12)


336
±0
±0
(12)


336

non-
survivors
NA



36
±16
±5
(11)
65
±45
±16
(8)


18
±17
±7
(7)


NA





NA

Body
weight
(8) on
day 0
114
±16
±5
(9)
110
±11
±3
(ID
109
±7
±2
(11)


102
±10
±3
(12)


114
±13
±4
(12)


132

Weight gain (g)
days
0-7
57
±11
±4
(8)
NA



NA





44
±7
±4
(3)
*
77%
45
±12
±5
(6)
m
79%
NA

days
0-14
113
±16
±6
(8)
NA



10
±31
±18
(3)
***
9%
102
±19
±8
(5)
ns
90%
101
±26
±7
(12)
ns
89%
NA

days
7-14
52
±17
dbS
(7)
NA



NA





71
±4
±2
(3)
*
137%
56
±11
±5
(6)
ns

NA

         59

-------
         RuCl,  / Oral administration
                                                                              $
                                                                              8
                                                                ...I.
                                                                     -ifi
m
                                                                       t
                                                                     .r
                                                                     itt-ty
                                                                       m"

                                                -i.j-
                                                                  1TT
                                                                  j.. •
                                                                      Lp:
                2.6
                    2.7
2.8
2.9     3.0
3.1
CHAMPION' I.INT NO. 074 - PROBABILITY X 90
                       Dose  (log)(mg salt/kg body weight)

                                   60

-------
TECHNICAL REPORT DATA
(Please read Instructions on the reverse before completing)
1. REPORT NO.
EPA-600/l-76-010a
2.
4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE
ASSESSMENT Of TOXfCITY OF AUTOMOTIVE METALl
Volume Ij Assessment of Fuel Additives Emis
yia Selected Assays of Nucleic Actd and Prc
7. AUTHOR(S)
David J, Hoi brook, Jr,
3. RECIPIENT'S ACCESSION-NO.
5. REPORT DATE
.1C EMISSIONS January 1976
>sion Toxicit'P'PERFORMINGORQANIZATION CODE
)tein Syrithes s
8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NO.
9. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS
Department of Biochemistry
School of Medicine
University of North. Carolina
Chapel Hill, N.C. Z7514
12. SPONSORING AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS
Heal th Effects Research Laboratory 	
Office of Research and Development
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Research Trianqle Park, N.C. 27711
10. PROGRAM ELEMENT NO.
1AA601
11. CONTRACT/G'RANT NO. •
68-02^1 Z05
13. TYPE OF REPORT AND PERIOD COVERED
Final
14. SPONSORING AGENCY CODE
EPA-ORD
15. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES
'\
16. ABSTRACT
Various parameters of toxic
palladium, and platinum. A
intraperitoneal injection a
PtCl4, Pt (5041.2, PdCl2., MnC
Concentrations of metallic
as are effects on weights o
Also following dietary admi
following parameters relate
microsomal protein/g livery
aminopyrtne deroethylase; co
protein.
Development of a rapid and
in studies of RNA synthesis
17.
ity have been studied for salts of manganese, lead,
cute toxicities (LD^50. doses I are reported for both
n.d oral administration for the, following salts j
lz., PdS04, PtCl2., RuCla, PtOz» PH), PdO, and MnOz-
ions following dietary^ administration are reported,
f five organs Giver, kidney, spleen, heart, testes).
nistration, hepatic microsomes were isolated and the
d to^in^vltro drug metabolism were measured: yield of
^tn VHrb" activities of aniline hydroxylase and
nteht of ' cytochromes Pr45Q and 55/mg microsomal
convenient method for the analysis of ribosomal RNA
is reported..
KEY WORDS AND DOCUMENT ANALYSIS
a. DESCRIPTORS
Toxlcity Metabolism
Manganese
Lead (metal I
palladium
platinum
Exhaust emissionsRihonucleic acids
Ribonucleic acids
18. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT
RELEASE TO PUBLIC
b.lDENTIFIERS/OPEN ENDED TERMS

19. SECURITY CLASS (This Report)'
UNCLASSIFIED
20. SECURITY CLASS (This page)
UNCLASSIFIED
c. COS AT I Field/Group
06 F, T
21 D
21. NO. OF PAGES
67
22. PRtCE
EPA Form 2220-1 (9-73)
                                                            61

-------
                                                         INSTRUCTIONS

    1.   REPORT NUMBER
         Insert the EPA report number as it appears on the cover of the publication.

    2.   LEAVE BLANK

    3.   RECIPIENTS ACCESSION NUMBER
         Reserved for use by each report recipient.

    4.   TITLE AND SUBTITLE
         Title should indicate clearly and briefly the subject coverage of the report, and be displayed prominently.  Set subtitle, if used, in smaller
         type or otherwise subordinate it to main title. When a report is prepared in more than one volume, repeat the primary title, add volume
         number and include subtitle for the specific title.

    5.   REPORT DATE
         Each report shall carry a date indicating at least month and year. Indicate the basis on which it was selected (e.g., date of issue, date of
         approval, date of preparation, etc.).

    6.   PERFORMING  ORGANIZATION CODE
         Leave blank.

    7.   AUTHOR(S)
         Give name(s) in  conventional order (John R. Doe, J. Robert Doe, etc.).  List author's affiliation if it differs from the performing organi-
         zation.

    8.   PERFORMING  ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBER
         Insert if performing organization wishes to assign this number.

    9.   PERFORMING  ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS
         Give name, street, city, state, and ZIP code.  List no more than two levels of an organizational hirearchy.

    10.  PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER
         Use the program element number under which the report was prepared. Subordinate numbers may be included in parentheses.

    11.  CONTRACT/GRANT NUMBER
         Insert contract or grant number under which report was prepared.

    12.  SPONSORING AGENCY  NAME AND ADDRESS
         Include ZIP code.

    13.  TYPE OF REPORT AND PERIOD COVERED
         Indicate interim final, etc., and if applicable, dates covered.

    14.  SPONSORING AGENCY  CODE
         Leave blank.

    15.  SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES
         Enter information not included elsewhere but useful, such as:  Prepared in cooperation with, Translation of, Presented at conference of,
         To be published in, Supersedes, Supplements, etc.

    16.  ABSTRACT
         Include a brief (200 words or less) factual summary of the most significant information contained in the report. If the report contains a
         significant bibliography or literature survey, mention it here.

    17.  KEY WORDS AND DOCUMENT ANALYSIS
         (a) DESCRIPTORS - Select from the Thesaurus of Engineering and Scientific Terms the proper authorized terms that  identify the major
         concept of the research and are sufficiently specific and precise to be used as index entries for cataloging.

         (b) IDENTIFIERS AND OPEN-ENDED TERMS - Use identifiers for project names, code names, equipment designators, etc. Use open-
         ended terms written in descriptor form for those subjects for which no descriptor exists.

         (c) COSATI FIELD GROUP - Field and group assignments are to be taken from the 1965 COSATI Subject Category List.  Since the ma-
        jority of documents are multidisciplinary in nature, the Primary Field/Group assignment(s) will be specific discipline, area of human
         endeavor, or type of physical object. The application(s) will be cross-referenced with secondary Field/Group assignments that will follow
         the primary posting(s).

    18.  DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT
         Denote reusability to the public or limitation for reasons other than security for example "Release Unlimited." Cite any availability to
         the public, with  address and price.

    19. &20.  SECURITY CLASSIFICATION
         DO NOT submit classified reports to the National Technical Information service.

    21. NUMBER OF PAGES
        Insert the total number of pages, including this one and unnumbered pages, but exclude distribution list, if any.

    22. PRICE
         Insert the price set by the  National Technical Information Service or the Government Printing Office, if known.
EPA Form 2220-1 (9-73) (Reverse)

-------