ORNL
Oak Ridge
National
Laboratory
Operated by
Union Carbide Corporation for the
Department of Energy
Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37830
  ORNL/EIS-85
EPA
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Office of Research and Development
Health Effects Research Laboratory
Cincinnati, Ohio 45268
EPA-600/1-78-050
      REVIEWS OF THE  ENVIRONMENTAL
      EFFECTS OF POLLUTANTS:
      IX.  FLUORIDE

-------
                RESEARCH REPORTING SERIES

Research reports of the Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, have been grouped into nine series. These nine broad cate-
gories were established to facilitate further development and application of en-
vironmental technology.  Elimination  of  traditional grouping was consciously
planned to foster technology transfer and a maximum interface in related fields.
The nine series are:

      1.  Environmental Health Effects Research
      2.  Environmental Protection Technology
      3.  Ecological Research
      4.  Environmental Monitoring
      5.  Socioeconomic Environmental Studies
      6.  Scientific and Technical Assessment Reports (STAR)
      7.  Interagency Energy-Environment Research and Development
      8.  "Special" Reports
      9.  Miscellaneous Reports
 This report has been assigned to the ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH EFFECTS RE-
 SEARCH series. This series describes projects and studies relating to the toler-
 ances  of man for unhealthful  substances or conditions. This work is generally
 assessed from a medical viewpoint, including physiological or psychological
 studies. In addition to toxicology and other medical specialities, study areas in-
 clude biomedical instrumentation and health research techniques utilizing ani-
 mals — but always with intended application to human health measures.
This document is available to the public through the National Technical Informa-
tion Service, Springfield, Virginia  22161.

-------
                                                        ORNL/EIS-85
                                                        EPA-600/1-78-050
 REVIEWS OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS OF POLLUTANTS:   IX.   FLUORIDE

                                 by

John S. Drury, John T. Ensminger, Anna S. Hammons,  James W.  Holleman,
     Eric B. Lewis, Elizabeth L. Preston, Carole R. Shriner, and
                           Leigh E. Towill
          Information Center Complex, Information Division
                    Oak Ridge National Laboratory
                     Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37830

                             operated by
                      Union Carbide Corporation
                               for the
                        Department of Energy
               Reviewers and Assessment Chapter Authors

           James L. Shupe, A. E. Olson, and H.  B.  Peterson
                        Utah State University
                             Logan, Utah
                  Interagency Agreement No. D5-0403
                           Project Officer
                           Jerry F. Stara
                    Office of Program Operations
                 Health Effects Research Laboratory
                       Cincinnati, Ohio 45268
                   Date Published:  September 1980
                            Prepared for
                 HEALTH EFFECTS RESEARCH LABORATORY
                 OFFICE OF RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
                 U.S ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
                       CINCINNATI, OHIO 45268

-------
     This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency
of the United States Government.  Neither the United States Government nor
any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, contractors, subcontractors,
or their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, nor assumes any
legal liability or responsibility for any third party's use or the results
of such use of any information, apparatus, product or process disclosed in
this report, nor represents that its use by such third party would not
infringe privately owned rights.

     This report has been reviewed by the Health Effects Research Labora-
tory, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, and approved for publication.
Approval does not signify that the contents necessarily reflect the views
and policies of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, nor does mention
of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommenda-
tion of use.

-------
                                CONTENTS
Figures	   vii
Tables	xiii
Foreword	   xxi
Acknowledgments 	 xxiii
Abstract	   xxv
1.  Summary	     1
    1.1  Discussion of Findings 	     1
         1.1.1  Chemical and Physical Properties and
                  Analytical Techniques 	     1
         1.1.2  Environmental Occurrence  	     2
         1.1.3  Environmental Cycling and Fate	     3
         1.1.4  Biological Aspects in Microorganisms  	     4
         1.1.5  Biological Aspects in Plants  	     5
         1.1.6  Biological Aspects in Animals 	     6
         1.1.7  Biological Aspects in Humans  	     7
         1.1.8  Food Web Interactions	     8
    1.2  Conclusions  	     9
2.  Chemical and Physical Properties and Analysis 	    12
    2.1  Summary	    12
    2.2  Physical and Chemical Properties 	    13
         2.2.1  Fluorine	    13
         2.2.2  Hydrogen Fluoride 	    16
         2.2.3  Fluorspar, Cryolite, and Fluorapatite 	    20
         2.2.4  Alkali Fluorides  	    23
         2.2.5  Silicon Tetrafluoride and Fluorosilicic Acid  .  .    23
         2.2.6  Halogen Fluorides 	    25
         2.2.7  Group VIA Fluorides	    27
         2.2.8  Organic Fluorides 	    29
         2.2.9  Uranium Hexafluoride	    33
    2.3  Analysis for Fluoride	    35
         2.3.1  Sampling and Sample Preparation	    35
         2.3.2  Separation of Fluoride	    39
         2.3.3  Methods of Analysis	    42
         2.3.4  Comparison of Analytical Procedures 	    49
3.  Biological Aspects in Microorganisms	    59
    3.1  Summary	    59
    3.2  Metabolism	    59
         3.2.1  Uptake and Accumulation	    60
         3.2.2  Biotransformation 	    66
    3.3  Effects	    68
         3.3.1  Toxic Effects	    68
         3.3.2  Metabolic Effects 	    79
    3.4  Prospects for Future Research  	    91
         3.4.1  Inorganic Fluorides 	    91
         3.4.2  Organic Fluorocompounds 	    93
4.  Biological Aspects in Plants  	   106
    4.1  Summary	   106
    4.2  Metabolism	   108
         4.2.1  Uptake and Absorption	   108
                                   iii

-------
         4.2.2  Translocation	   113
         4.2.3  Cellular Metabolism of Fluoride 	   114
         4.2.4  Distribution	   118
         4.2.5  Bioelimination	   135
    4.3  Effects	   137
         4.3.1  Metabolic Effects 	   138
         4.3.2  Symptoms of Fluoride Accumulation 	   146
         4.3.3  Effects of Fluoride on Growth and
                  Productivity  	   152
         4.3.4  Cytogenetic Effects 	   162
5.  Biological Aspects in Domestic and Wild Animals 	   176
    5.1  Summary	   176
    5.2  Insects	   177
         5.2.1  Metabolism	   177
         5.2.2  Effects	   178
    5.3  Aquatic Organisms  	   185
         5.3.1  Metabolism	   185
         5.3.2  Effects	   190
    5.4  Birds	   195
         5.4.1  Metabolism	   195
         5.4.2  Effects	   197
    5.5  Domestic and Wild Mammals	   201
         5.5.1  Metabolism	   201
         5.5.2  Effects	   212
6.  Biological Aspects in Humans  	   242
    6.1  Summary	   242
    6.2  Essentiality of Fluoride	   244
    6.3  Metabolism	   246
         6.3.1  Uptake	   246
         6.3.2  Distribution and Balance	   249
    6.4  Effects	   265
         6.4.1  Effects on Enzymes and Cell Systems	   265
         6.4.2  Fluoride and Teeth	   281
         6.4.3  Toxicity of Fluorine and Fluorine Compounds .  .  .   291
         6.4.4  Teratogenesis, Mutagenesis, and
                  Carcinogenesis  	   320
7.  Environmental Distribution and Transformation 	   349
    7.1  Summary	   349
    7.2  Production and Usage	   350
    7.3  Distribution of Fluoride in the Environment	   350
         7.3.1  Sources of Pollution	   350
         7.3.2  Distribution in Rocks and Soils	   360
         7.3.3  Distribution in Water	   368
         7.3.4  Distribution in Air	   375
    7.4  Environmental Fate	   380
         7.4.1  Mobility and Persistence in Soils	   380
         7.4.2  Mobility and Persistence in Water	   381
         7.4.3  Mobility and Persistence in Air	   382
    7.5  Waste Management	   382
8.  Environmental Interactions and Their Consequences 	   392
    8.1  Summary	   392
    8.2  Environmental Cycling of Fluoride  	   392
                                   iv

-------
8.3  Fluoride in Foods	    393
8.4  Bioaccumulation in Food Chains	    397
Environmental Assessment of Fluoride  	    406
9.1  Introduction	    406
9.2  Properties and Environmental Occurrences 	    406
     9.2.1  Soils	    406
     9.2.2  Water	    407
     9.2.3  Air	    407
9-3  Environmental Interactions 	    408
     9.3.1  Soils	    408
     9.3.2  Water	    409
     9.3.3  Air	    409
     9.3.4  Industrial Effluents  	    409
     9.3.5  General Biological Aspects  	    409
9.4  Microorganisms	    410
9.5  Vegetation	    410
     9.5.1  Sources of Fluorides to Vegetation  	    411
     9.5.2  Fluoroorganic Compounds 	    412
     9.5.3  Symptoms and Susceptibility	    412
     9.5.4  Effects on Vegetation	    412
9.6  Domestic and Wild Animals	    414
     9.6.1  Sources of Fluorides to Animals	    414
     9.6.2  Fluoride Toxicosis  	    415
     9.6.3  Signs and Lesions	    415
     9.6.4  Diagnosis	    421
     9.6.5  Treatment	    423
     9.6.6  Species Tolerances  	    423
     9.6.7  Prevention of Fluoride Toxicosis  	    425
9.7  Humans	    425
9.8  Research Needs	    431
     9.8.1  Properties and Environmental Occurrences  ....    431
     9.8.2  Environmental Interactions  	    431
     9.8.3  Microorganisms	    431
     9.8.4  Vegetation	    432
     9.8.5  Domestic and Wild Animals	    432
     9.8.6  Humans	    434
9.9  Conclusions	    434

-------
                                FIGURES


2.1  Typical wet-impinger collector  	  36

2.2  Types of dry, cascade impingers	37

2.3  Apparatus for distillation of fluoride  	  40

2.4  Diffusion apparatus:  (a) vaseline seal, (2?) acidified
       sample (a) plastic cup, (d) trapping solution, and
       (e) lid	41

2.5  Cross sections of typical selective ion electrodes  	  45

2.6  Potentiometric measuring circuit showing measuring (M)
       and reference (R) electrodes and potentiometers 	  45

3.1  Growth of Pseudomonas sp. on 0.1% p-fluorophenylacetic
       acid	60

3.2  Structures of metabolites isolated from medium after
       incubation of Pseudomonas sp. with p-fluorophenyl-
       acetic acid	66

3.3  Release of F~ ion by a Pseudomonas sp. from racemic
       ert/tTiro-fluorocitric acid in two experiments	67

3.4  The effect of the duration of 50 mftf NaF treatment on
       production of conidia; initial treatment was to
       4-hr-old Neurospora crassa cultures 	  70

3.5  Oxygen uptake during NaF treatment of Neurospora crassa ...  80

3.6  Effect of fluoride at pH 5.2 on photosynthesis (left)
       and on the Hill reaction (right) in Plectonema
       boryanwn cell suspensions 	  81

3.7  Effect of fluoride on an actively synthesizing
       polysaccharide system of Streptococcus mitis  	  84

3.8  Effect of the phosphorylation uncoupler carbonylcyanide-
       p-trifluoromethoxy-phenylhydrazone  (FCCP) on replica-
       tion of RC1 phage in photosynthetically grown cells of
       Rhodopseudomonas capsulata Z-l incubated under photo-
       synthetic conditions	86

3.9  Effect of NaF treatment on protein, RNA, and DNA
       synthesis of Neurospora crassa  	  87
                                 vii

-------
 4.1  Comparison of the amounts of fluoride taken up by Acacia
        georginae from solutions of sodium fluoride, 300 yg/ml
        (15.75 mW)  at pH 6.6 and pH 4.0 (acidification with
        nitric acid)   	 109

 4.2  Fluorine content of washed (solid) and unwashed (shaded)
        leaves of six citrus varieties as affected by gaseous
        hydrogen fluoride exposure  	 130

 4.3  Fluorine content of washed (solid) and unwashed (shaded)
        leaves of six ornamental species as affected by
        gaseous hydrogen fluoride exposure  	 131

 4.4  Comparison of uptake by grass of fluoride from hydrogen
        fluoride and from submicron particulate fluoride  	 133

 4.5  Fluoride accumulation in mixed planting of timothy and
        red clover with intermittent (solid symbols) and
        continuous (open symbols) fumigations 	 134

 4.6  Inhibition of apparent photosynthetic rates of barley
        and oat canopies by 2-hr air pollution fumigations  .... 140

 4.7  Possible effects of fluoride on agriculture 	 152

 4.8  Relation of concentration and duration of exposure to
        effects of atmospheric fluoride on tomato 	 154

 4.9  Relation of concentration and duration of exposure to
        effects of atmospheric fluoride on alfalfa  	 155

4.10  Relation of concentration and duration of exposure to
        effects of atmospheric fluoride on gladiolus  	 156

4.11  Relation of concentration and duration of exposure to
        effects of atmospheric fluoride on sorghum (Milo
        maize)	157

 5.1  The amount of 3SS02F2 present in the eggs of
        Schistocerca gregaria and Tenebrio molitor at
        different stages of embryonic development 	 177

 5.2  Uptake and removal of fluoride from the (a) exoskeleton,
        (b) gills, (
-------
 5.5  Fluorine-18 concentration in blood of lambs following
        oral administration	206

 5.6  Diurnal variation in plasma fluoride in sheep 	  206

 5.7  Fluorine-18 levels in blood from mature cows after
        intravenous dosing  	  207

 5.8  Effect of fluoride source on fluoride deposition
        (expressed as percentage of bone ash) in three
        sections of the metacarpal bones of cattle	208

 5.9  Average fluoride-18 concentration in excreta and
        saliva from mature cows	211

5.10  Relationship of urinary fluoride level to the fluoride
        in dry matter consumed by cows	212

5.11  Variation of incisor classification of 4 or 5 with
        distance from industrial plants in annular segments ....  223

5.12  Calving rate of cows on three levels of fluorine
        intake	229

 6.1  Urinary fluoride excretions during fluoride supplemental
        intake of 45 mg/day	250

 6.2  Skeletal concentrations of fluoride in residents of
        West Hartlepool, South Shields, and Leeds, England,
        and Rochester, New York	252

 6.3  Mobilization of fluoride from the human skeleton	253

 6.4  The compartment-system model and differential equations
        for calculation of bone and urinary 18F clearance
        after a single intravenous injection  	  255

 6.5  Percentage of radiologically detectable calcification
        of abdominal aorta in males and females residing in
        high- and low-fluoride areas	260

 6.6  Maternal-fetal transfer of X8F in the human and in the
        rabbit	261

 6.7  Scatter diagram of the maternal versus the cord serum
        fluoride values taken at the time of delivery	261

 6.8  Inorganic plasma fluoride related to duration of
        pregnancy	263
                                  ix

-------
 6.9  Effect of varying concentrations of ATP and Mga+ on
        adenyl cyclase activity in fat cell ghosts: (a)
        activities are measured at fixed concentration of
        Mg"1"1" (5 mM);  (Z>) activities are measured at fixed
        concentration of ATP (5.84 mW)	270

6.10  Loss of adenyl cyclase activity in a rabbit skeletal
        muscle homogenate at 4°C	271

6.11  Effect of increasing concentrations of sodium fluoride
        on brain adenyl cyclase activity in rats  	 272

6.12  The proposed mechanism of activation of adenylate
        cyclase system  	 274

6.13  A schematic representation of the adenylate cyclase of
        the cyclase-PDE model cyclic AMP generating system  .... 275

6.14  Effect of pyruvate on 22Na release and cellular NAD
        concentration in fluoride-treated and control
        erythrocytes  	 278

6.15  Effect of fluoride at two concentration levels on the
        regeneration of skin in the rabbit ear	280

6.16  Relation between decayed, missing, and filled teeth
        (broken line at left), severity of fluorosis (solid
        lines), and fluoride concentration in water
        (logarithmic scale) 	 282

6.17  Relationship among fluoride levels, fluorosis, and
        ambient temperatures  	 283

6.18  Fluoride concentrations in portions of alveolar bone
        and teeth	286

6.19  The relationship between age and the fluoride content of
        human premolar (a) enamel and (2?) dentin	287

6.20  Communities, water-supply systems, and population served
        with fluoridated water, 1960-1970 	 288

6.21  Relationship between fluoride concentration of public
        water supply and number of dental caries in
        permanent teeth of children 	 288

6.22  Relationship between dental caries prevalence
        (permanent teeth) and fluoride ingestion as
        measured by percentage of children showing dental
        fluorosis in 8576 selected 12- to 14-year-old
        children in 27 cities	289

-------
6.23  Reduction in caries incidence in permanent teeth of
        children from Grand Rapids, Michigan, after 10 and
        15 years of fluoridation	290

6.24  Relationship between fluoride concentration of drinking
        water and fluoride concentration of the urine	296

6.25  Scheme of the effects of fluoride on calcium homeo-
        stasis (osteocytic resorption) and bone metabolism
        (osteoclastic resorption) 	 296

6.26  Effect of Freon 11 on cardiac conduction in dogs	308

6.27  Freon 11 results:  note narrow margin between concen-
        tration eliciting earliest detectable yet reversible
        change and concentration of the first lethal result .... 309

6.28  Serum fluoride and "organic acid—labile fluoride"
        (OALF) concentrations of all samples taken from 15
        patients at various times after the end of
        anesthesia	312

6.29  Mean serum inorganic fluoride levels for all three
        patient groups combined plotted against time in hours .  .  . 314

6.30  Plasma fluoride levels following methoxyflurane
        analgesia for (a) delivery only, (b) for labor and
        delivery, and (c) for caesarean section (* indicates
        significant change from control)  	 315

 7.1  Supply-demand relationships for fluoride (all forms)  .... 353

 7.2  Fluorine concentrations in surficial materials of the
        conterminious United States 	 363

 7.3  Maximum fluoride content of U.S. waters (by counties) .... 374

 7.4  U.S. production and environmental release of
        fluorocarbons 	 379

 8.1  Environmental transfer of fluoride  	 392

 8.2  Dispersion of fluoride in the biosphere	393

 9.1  Routes of fluorides in the environment	408

 9.2  Apricot leaves showing various degrees of necrosis
        caused by excessive levels of atmospheric fluoride  .... 413

 9.3  Classification of representative incisor teeth from
        cattle from 0 to 5 reading left to right in A and B . . .  . 416

-------
9.4  Permanent bovine Incisor teeth  	  417

9.5  Metatarsal bones from two cows of the same breed,  size,
       and age:  left — normal bone; right — severe
       osteofluorosis  	  418

9.6  Cross sections of the two metatarsal bones shown in
       Figure 9.5	419

9.7  Water intake by beef cattle at different ambient air
       temperatures  	  422

9.8  Permanent human teeth of a 55-year-old man	430
                                 xii

-------
                                 TABLES


 2.1  Physical properties of fluorine 	   14

 2.2  Properties of some ionic fluorides	15

 2.3  Properties of some covalent fluorides 	   17

 2.4  Some physical properties of anhydrous hydrogen fluoride ...   18

 2.5  Physical properties of calcium fluoride 	   21

 2.6  Physical properties of cryolite 	   22

 2.7  Some physical properties of silicon tetrafluoride 	   24

 2.8  Solubility of silicon tetrafluoride in various solvents ...   25

 2.9  Physical properties of some inorganic fluorosilicates ....   26

2.10  Halogen fluorides:  types and boiling points  	   27

2.11  Some physical properties of oxygen difluoride 	   28

2.12  Selected physical properties of sulfur tetrafluoride  ....   28

2.13  Some physical properties of disulfur decafluoride 	   29

2.14  Properties of sulfur hexafluoride 	   30

2.15  Some physical properties of aliphatic fluorocarbons 	   32

2.16  Some physical properties of uranium hexafluoride  	   34

2.17  Methods for determining fluoride  	   43

 3.1  Incorporation of 5-fluorouracil into RNA of various
        microbial species 	   61

 3.2  Fluoride concentration in a Streptococcus isolated
        from human plaque and grown on media containing a
        range of fluoride with final pH reached after
        incubation with sucrose for 18 hr	62

 3.3  Accumulation of fluoride by lichens exposed to four
        days of uniform ambient fluoride levels (5 yg of
        fluoride per cubic meter) but under varying relative
        humidity regimes  	   63

 3.4  Fluoride concentrations of transplanted lichens 	   63
                                  xiii

-------
 3.5  Fluoride concentrations in lichens  	  64

 3.6  Fluoride concentrations in washed and unwashed yeast
        after successive fermentation series  	  65

 3.7  Effects of sodium fluoride on growth and sporulation
        of pathogenic fungi 	  71

 3.8  Effects of fluorocarbon aerosol propellants on
        microorganisms  	  73

 3.9  Survival of a coagulase-positive (Giorgio) strain and
        two coagulase-negative strains (Guinn and ATCC 6020)
        of Staphylococcus aureus as determined by colony
        counts after exposing the bacterial cells to 5-min
        gassing treatment (30 ml/min) and a subsequent 24 hr
        in the gaseous atmosphere	76

3.10  Effects of fluoride on respiration of the aquatic fungi
        Allomyces javaniaits and Brevilegnia itnisperma var.
        delioa	80

3.11  Effects of fluoride (NaF) on microbial carbohydrate
        metabolism	82

3.12  Enzyme inhibition by soluble fluorides  	  88

3.13  Effects of fluoride on microbial enzymatic activity 	  89

3.14  Influence of sodium fluoride on the enzymes involved in
        the synthesis and degradation of glycogen in crude
        extracts of Streptococcus salivarius  	  90

3.15  Effects of 5-fluorouracil incorporation of enzymatic
        activity	90

 4.1  Effect of 50 ppm fluorine (as NaF) in nutrient solution
        (series A and B) and of HF fumigation (series C and D)
        on the degree of injury and fluoride levels in tissues
        of tomato plants grown with different levels of
        nitrogen, calcium, and phosphorus 	 Ill

 4.2  Changes in fluoride concentrations in different sections
        of snow princess gladiolus leaves following fumigation
        with hydrogen fluoride  	 112

 4.3  Fluoride content and fresh weights of mature navel orange
        trees grown for 18 months in solution cultures with and
        without fluoride present in the nutrient solutions  .... 114

 4.4  Distribution of fluorine in tropical plants 	 117
                                  xiv

-------
 4.5  Fluoride concentrations in selected plants  	 119

 4.6  Fluoride values in tissues of various plants  	 122

 4.7  Treatments and tissue fluoride concentrations for
        bean experiments	132

 4.8  Concentrations of fluoride in plants near the Anaconda
        Aluminum Company smelter in northwest Montana 	 136

 4.9  Distribution of 19F and *8F in various cellular
        constituents of tomato leaves treated through the
        aerial portions of the plant	 137

4.10  Nature of fluoride-induced effects in plants at
        different levels of biological organization 	 138

4.11  Seasonal effects of fluoride (1 mA/ NaF) on photo-
        synthesis and respiration of foliage from three
        species of pines and six species of hardwood	139

4.12  The Q02 ratio (water infiltrated to fluoride infiltrated)
        of bean seedlings at three growth stages  	 141

4.13  Sensitivity of selected plants to fluoride  	 148

4.14  Effect of fumigation with relatively low concentrations
        of hydrogen fluoride on the photosynthesis of plants  . .  . 161

 5.1  Fluoride levels in control insects  	 178

 5.2  Fluoride levels in test insects	179

 5.3  Sodium fluoride toxicity to selected insect species 	 180

 5.4  LTso values computed for various doses of sodium
        fluoride and development stages of selected
        insect species  	 180

 5.5  Mortality of Cryptotermes brevis exposed to sulfuryl
        fluoride for 3 hr in temperature-controlled
        fumigation chambers 	 181

 5.6  Toxicity of inorganic fluoride compounds to Bonibyx mori
        and Apis mellifera	182

 5.7  Egg production by Tribolium confusion per five-day
        interval after exposure to sodium fluoride levels
        varying from 0 to 0.1%	183

 5.8  Mean values of biological parameter response in
        Drosophila melanogaster to atmospheric contamination
        by hydrogen fluoride  	 183
                                   xv

-------
 5.9  Recessive mutation rate in Drosophila melanogaster
        exposed to perfluorobutene-2 and perfluorobutene-2
        in combination with oxygen, carbon dioxide, nitro-
        gen, and compressed air	184

5.10  Fluoride concentrations in dried tissues of crabs
        from natural, unpolluted waters 	 186

5.11  Fluoride analysis of tissues from aquatic species
        collected from Lynemouth Power Station (England)
        inflow filter and from offshore sites 	 188

5.12  Toxicity of fluorides to aquatic species  	 192

5.13  The effect of increased fluoride (as sodium fluoride)
        in artificial seawater of various marine, intertidal
        animals of the Northumbrian coast 	 194

5.14  Femur fluoride levels in birds collected from
        uncontaminated ecosystems  	 195

5.15  Bone and gizzard fluoride concentrations in birds in
        an uncontaminated area of New Zealand	196

5.16  Tissue fluoride levels of seabirds from the coast of
        Great Britain	197

5.17  Fluoride levels in tissues of turkeys fed various
        amounts of sodium fluoride  	 198

5.18  The effect of dietary fluoride on enzyme systems of
        chicks	199

5.19  Fluoride concentrations in bones of wild and
        domestic animals  	 202

5.20  Fluoride levels in femurs of wild animals	203

5.21  The effect of added dietary increments of fluoride
        (as sodium fluoride) on soft tissue fluoride
        concentrations in dairy cows	210

5.22  Fluoride concentration in metacarpal bones of newborn
        calves	210

5.23  Response of domestic animals to various levels of
        fluoride dosage:  minimal response  	 214

5.24  Response of domestic animals to various levels of
        fluoride dosage:  acute response  	 215

5.25  Response of domestic animals to various levels of
        fluoride dosage:  lethal doses  	 216
                                  xvi

-------
5.26  Dental lesions associated with exposure of livestock
        to elevated fluoride levels 	  219

5.27  Skeletal lesions associated with exposure of livestock
        to elevated fluoride levels 	  224

5.28  The effects of added dietary increments of fluoride
        (as sodium fluoride) on the calcification of bones
        and joints of dairy cows	226

5.29  Lameness associated with exposure of livestock to
        elevated fluoride levels  	  227

5.30  Nutritional signs associated with exposure of
        livestock to elevated fluoride levels 	  230

5.31  Dietary fluoride tolerances for domestic animals  	  232

5.32  Tolerance of animals for fluoride	233

 6.1  Fluoride balances before, during, and after sodium
        fluoride (NaF) supplementation  	  250

 6.2  Fluoride levels in soft tissues of animals	257

 6.3  The concentration of fluoride in human soft tissues
        in relation to that in the water supply	258

 6.4  Concentrations of fluoride in human soft tissues,
        normal deaths 	  258

 6.5  Fluoride content of human tissues following fluoride
        poisoning fatalities  	  259

 6.6  Fluoride concentration in placenta  	  262

 6.7  Fluoride content of ashed fetal bones and teeth 	  263

 6.8  Concentrations of fluoride found in human milk  	  264

 6.9  Calculated distribution of total body fluoride in
        human tissues	265

6.10  Summary of effects of fluoride on enzyme systems	267

6.11  Effects of inorganic fluoride compounds on enzyme
        systems	268

6.12  Effect of epinephrine and fluoride on cyclic AMP
        formation by adipocytes before and after
        homogenization	271
                                  xvii

-------
6.13  Threshold limit values of various fluorine compounds  .... 294

6.14  Olefin toxicities 	 304

6.15  Inhalation toxicity of fluoromethanes 	 305

6.16  Classification of propellants based on toxicity to
        respiratory and circulatory systems 	 306

6.17  Comparative life hazard of gases and vapors	307

6.18  Lethal concentrations of several fire-extinguishing
        agents	317

6.19  Toxicities of various gases encountered in fire
        fighting	318

6.20  Minimal concentrations of halogenated fire-
        extinguishing agents required to produce
        characteristic reactions in rats  	 318

6.21  Toxicities of fire-extinguishing agents 	 319

6.22  Mortality and response of several mammalian species
        to pyrolyzed bromotrifluoromethane (CF3Br)  	 319

 7.1  Uses of selected fluoride compounds	351

 7.2  Summary of forecasts of U.S. and world fluorine demand,
        1973-2000	354

 7.3  Soluble fluoride emissions  	 355

 7.4  Fluorine emissions from processing phosphates 	 358

 7.5  Fluoride concentrations in atmospheric precipitation  .... 361

 7.6  Fluoride content of certain micaceous clays 	 362

 7.7  Fluoride in soils	364

 7.8  Fluoride content of principal German fertilizers  	 368

 7.9  Fluoride in North American waters 	 369

7.10  The occurrence of fluoride in drinking water from
        various countries 	 372

7.11  U.S. Public Health Service recommended limits for
        fluoride concentration  	 373

7.12  Fluoride in particulate matter collected from the
        air of U.S. cities	376
                                  xviii

-------
7.13  The occurrence of fluoride in the atmosphere of some
        U.S. communities	376

7.14  Fluoride in urban and nonurban U.S. air, 1966-1968  	  377

7.15  Fluorides in air near industrial operations	378

7.16  Fluoride retention from 200- and 800-lb applications
        of hydrofluoric acid in four soils	381

7.17  Rates of removal of fluoride from seawater due to
        incorporation into various minerals 	  382

7.18  Fluoride waste treatment processes  	  383

 8.1  Fluoride content of various foods and beverages 	  394

 8.2  Fluoride content of various foods and beverages
        processed in either fluoridated or unfluoridated
        water	396

 8.3  Estimated daily fluoride intake from food and
        drinking water  	  397

 8.4  Daily dietary fluoride intake for various countries 	  398

 8.5  Estimates of total daily fluoride intake in the United
        States, the United Kingdom, Russia, and Japan 	  399

 8.6  Fluoride in diets in North American 	  400

 8.7  Bioaccumulation of fluoride in selected plants and
        animals	401

 9.1  Guide to diagnosis and evaluation of fluoride effects
        in dairy cattle	420

 9.2  Fluoride tolerance levels in feed and water for
        domestic animals based on clinical signs and lesions  .  . .  424

 9.3  Fluoride content of various foods  	  427
                                   xix

-------
                                FOREWORD
     A vast amount of published material is accumulating as numerous
research investigations are conducted to develop a data base on the adverse
effects of environmental pollution.  As this information is amassed, it
becomes continually more critical to focus on pertinent, well-designed
studies.  Research data must be summarized and interpreted in order to
adequately evaluate the potential hazards of these substances to ecosystems
and ultimately to public health.  The Reviews of the Environmental Effects
of Pollutants (REEPs) series represents an extensive compilation of rele-
vant research and forms an up-to-date compendium of the environmental
effect data on selected pollutants.

     Reviews of the Environmental Effects of Pollutants:  IX.  Fluoride
includes information on chemical and physical properties; pertinent ana-
lytical techniques; transport processes to the environment and subsequent
distribution and deposition; impact on microorganisms, plants, and wild-
life; toxicologic data in experimental animals including metabolism, tox-
icity, mutagenicity, teratogenicity, and carcinogenicity; and an assessment
of its health effects in man.  The large volume of factual information
presented in this document is summarized and interpreted in the final
chapter, "Environmental Assessment," which presents an overall evaluation
of the potential hazard resulting from present concentrations of fluoride
in the environment.  This final chapter represents a major contribution by
James L. Shupe, A. E. Olson, and H. B. Peterson of Utah State University.

     The REEPs are intended to serve various technical and administrative
personnel within the Agency in the decision-making processes, i.e., in
the development of criteria documents and environmental standards, and
for other regulatory actions.  The breadth of these documents makes them
a useful resource for public health personnel, environmental specialists,
and control officers.  Upon request these documents will be made available
to any interested individuals or firms, both in and out of the government.
Depending on the supply, the document can be obtained directly by writing
to:

     Dr. Jerry F. Stara
     U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
     Health Effects Research Laboratory
     26 W. St. Clair Street
     Cincinnati, Ohio  45268
                                    R. J. Garner
                                    Director
                                    Health Effects Research Laboratory
                                   xxi

-------
                             ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
     The authors are particularly grateful to W. R. Laing and S. B.
Mclaughlin, Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), for reviewing prelimi-
nary drafts of this report and for offering helpful comments and sugges-
tions.  The advice and support of Helga B. Gerstner, Manager, Information
Center Complex, and Jerry F. Stara, EPA Project Officer, and the coopera-
tion of the Toxicology Information Response Center, the Environmental
Mutagen Information Center, and the Environmental Resource Center of the
Information Center Complex, Information Division, ORNL, are gratefully
acknowledged.  The authors also thank Carol McGlothin and Maureen Hafford,
editors, and Donna Stokes and Patricia Hartman, typists, for preparing
the manuscript for publication.

     Appreciation is also expressed to Bonita M. Smith, Karen L. Blackburn,
and Donna J. Sivulka for EPA in-house reviews and editing and for coordi-
nating contractual arrangements.  The efforts of Allan Susten and Rosa
Raskin in coordinating early processing of the reviews were important in
laying the groundwork for document preparation.  The support of R. John
Garner, Director of Health Effects Research Laboratory, is much appreciated.
Thanks are also expressed to Carol A. Haynes for typing correspondence
and corrected reviews.
                                  xxiii

-------
                                ABSTRACT
     This study is a comprehensive, multidisciplinary review of the health
and environmental effects of fluoride on microorganisms, plants, wild and
domestic animals, and humans.  More than 1000 references are cited.

     Fluoride is widely distributed in the environment, occurring in
igneous rocks (210 to 1000 ppm) , sedimentary rocks (180 to 940 ppm),
normal soils (200 to 300 ppm), surface waters (uncontaminated lakes and
streams, <0.3 ppm), seawater (approximately 1.5 ppm), and air (nonindus-
trial areas, <0.05 ug/m3).  Most fluoride emissions to the atmosphere
occur during the manufacture of phosphorus and phosphate fertilizer, the
operation of aluminum- and steel-producing furnaces,  the production of
brick and tile products, and the combustion of coal.   Liquid-fluoride
wastes are generated primarily during the production of glass products,
pesticides, fertilizers, aluminum, steel and inorganic chemicals, and in
metal-processing industries.

     Human intake of fluoride is chiefly through the diet; drinking water
is normally the largest single source.  Low concentrations of fluoride
in water (approximately 1 ppm) benefit mammalian systems, making bone
and tooth apatite less soluble, but long-term ingestion of water contain-
ing more than 8 ppm fluoride causes fluorosis in humans.  Fluoride salts
are lethal to humans when ingested in doses of about 3 g or more.  At
concentrations normally encountered by the general public, fluoride is
not teratogenic, mutagenic, or carcinogenic to humans, but chronic fluo-
ride toxicosis of both livestock and wildlife is an important problem in
many areas of the United States.  The principal manifestations of chronic
fluoride toxicosis in livestock are dental fluorosis, osteofluorosis,
lameness, and impaired performance.  Among domestic animals, dairy cattle
are the most sensitive to excessive fluoride exposure.

     This report was submitted in partial fulfillment of Interagency
Agreement No. D5-0403 between the Department of Energy and the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency.  The report was completed in December
1979.
                                   XXV

-------
                                SECTION 1

                                 SUMMARY


1.1  DISCUSSION OF FINDINGS

1.1.1  Chemical and Physical Properties and Analytical Techniques

     Fluorine is a pale yellow acrid gas that freezes to a colorless
solid at -219.6°C and boils at -188.2°C; it is a common element, ranking
13th in abundance and constituting 0.06% to 0.09% of the earth's crust.
Fluorine is highly reactive and rarely exists in the elementary state in
nature.  It usually occurs as ionic or covalently bonded fluoride.  The
most common chemical forms are hydrogen fluoride, alkali fluorides, sili-
con tetrafluoride, sodium fluorosilicate, fluorocarbons, uranium hexaflu-
oride, chalcogen and halogen fluorides, and the minerals cryolite,
fluorapatite, and fluorspar (Section 2.2).

     Techniques for sampling environmental sources for fluoride are well
established, except for the partitioning of airborne gaseous and particu-
late fluorides.  A variety of good analytical methods are available for
determining fluoride in environmental media.  The widely used spectrophoto-
metric procedure based on the zirconyl-SPADNS reagent is now being rapidly
superseded by the relatively new fluoride ion electrode.  The latter tech-
nique has comparable, or better, sensitivity (1 to 100 ng/g), precision
(1% to 10%), and accuracy (1% to 5%) and is quicker and more convenient
than other methods for most types of fluoride samples.  Fluoride in envi-
ronmental samples can also be determined by polarographic, enzymatic, and
activation analyses techniques, but these methods are competitive with the
fluoride ion electrode method only under special circumstances (Section
2.3.3).

     The biochemistry of fluorides is complex.  Drinking water concentra-
tions of about 1 ppm fluoride are beneficial to mammals, reducing the dis-
solution of hydroxyapatite crystals in teeth and bone through the formation
of the less soluble fluorapatite.  About 99% of the fluoride retained in
the human body is localized in this fashion.  However, higher levels of
fluoride are toxic to all biological systems.  The manner in which excess
fluoride interferes with biochemical processes is not well understood at
the molecular level.  It is known, nevertheless, that excess fluoride pre-
vents oxidative metabolism by inhibiting the action of enzymes that depend
on polyvalent cations such as magnesium, calcium, iron, and manganese.  In
addition, other body functions that require complexable polyvalent metal
ions (e.g., membrane transport, nerve conduction, muscle contraction, and
blood clotting) are also disrupted.  It is apparent that the fluoride ion,
per se, is responsible for the toxic effects.  Accordingly, soluble inor-
ganic fluoride salts are more toxic than insoluble salts, and most organic
compounds that do not yield free fluoride ions in body fluids have little
or no toxicity.  The naturally occurring organic compounds fluoroacetic
acid and to-fluorooleic acid are exceptions to this rule; their highly toxic
effect is due not to free fluoride ion but to their metabolic conversion

-------
to fluorocitric acid, which interferes with the chemistry of the Krebs
cycle, causing metabolic death of the cell.  Treatment of acute fluoride
intoxication is based on reducing the cellular availability of fluoride
through the formation of complexes or precipitates in the intestinal tract
or in the bloodstream.

1.1.2  Environmental Occurrence

     Fluoride is widely distributed in the environment.  It occurs most
abundantly in ores, such as fluorspar (CaF2); in phosphate and silicate
minerals, such as fluorapatite [CaF2*3Ca3(PO*,)2]; and in topaz [Al2SiOt,
(F,OH)2].  It is also present in lesser amounts in most igneous (210 to
1000 ppm) and sedimentary (180 to 940 ppm) rocks.  Normal mineral soils
average 200 to 300 ppm fluoride.   Generally, sandy soils contain less
than average amounts of fluoride while heavier soils contain more.  Soils
naturally rich in phosphorus tend to contain above-average fluoride con-
centrations — in extreme cases, levels of 7000 to 8000 ppm are observed
(Section 7.3.2.2).

     Fluoride is a normal constituent of natural waters.  The fluoride
content of surface water depends on the water source and the amount of
precipitation received; normally, fluoride in uncontaminated lakes and
streams does not exceed 0.3 ppm.   Seawater usually contains more fluoride
than fresh surface water — about 1.4 to 1.5 ppm in waters of normal salin-
ity.  Highly saline waters have increased concentrations of fluoride; the
Great Salt Lake in Utah and certain lakes in Kenya, Africa, contain 14 and
1600 ppm fluoride respectively.  Fluoride in groundwaters, such as springs,
wells, and infiltration galleries, varies greatly depending on the type
of rock the water flows through.   Groundwaters associated with alkalic
igneous rock, dolomite, phosphorite, and volcanic glasses contain fluoride
concentrations that usually do not exceed 10 ppm but may occasionally reach
60 to 70 ppm.  Large areas of the world have local groundwaters with more
than 1.5 ppm fluoride.  Limits set by the U.S. Public Health Service for
fluoride in drinking water vary from 0.6 to 1.7 mg/liter, depending on
local air temperatures.  Nearly all U.S. public water supply systems meet
this standard (Section 7.3.3).

     Fluorides occur naturally in the atmosphere; soluble gaseous fluorides
and soluble and insoluble dusts are formed as a result of the weathering
of rocks and minerals, volcanic activities, and precipitation.  The concen-
trations of these materials in ambient air depend on the amount of fluoride
emitted, the distance from the source, meteorological conditions, and the
topography of the area.  In both rural and urban areas, atmospheric fluo-
ride concentrations are typically reported as less than 0.05 ug/m3, the
limit of detection of the analytical method used in the survey.  However,
higher localized atmospheric concentrations of fluoride frequently result
from industrial activities, particularly the combustion of coal, the manu-
facturing of aluminum and steel, and the production of phosphate fertil-
izer.  U.S. coals contain about 60 ppm fluoride.  Half of this fluoride
escapes  to the atmosphere during combustion as hydrogen fluoride, silicon
tetrafluoride, or fluoride particulates.  Similar contaminants are released
during phosphate fertilizer production, and average fluoride concentrations

-------
in excess of 3 yg/m3 have been reported in the air near older phosphate
fertilizer manufacturing plants.  These concentrations are well below the
threshold limit values of 2.5 and 0.2 mg/m3 set for fluoride and fluorine
in the workplace, respectively, by the American Conference of Governmental
Industrial Hygienists (Section 7.3.4).

     Hydrogen fluoride is the most important manufactured fluoride; it is
the intermediate from which all other fluorides are prepared.  In 1974,
the U.S. consumption of all forms of fluorides amounted to 625,100 metric
tons (689,000 short tons), computed as fluorine.  About one-third of this
total (32.5%) was consumed in synthesizing organic compounds and products
such as dichlorodifluoromethane, trichlorofluoromethane, tetrafluorometh-
ane, tetrafluoroethylene, vinyl fluoride, and hexafluoropropene, which
were used for aerosol propellants, refrigerants, and fluorinated plastics.
The remaining fluoride was used primarily by metal producing or processing
industries; steel and electrometallurgical fluxing, 44%; nonferrous metal
production, 22%; ceramics and glass manufacture, 1.3%; and other processes,
0.2% (Section 7.2).

     Large quantities of chlorine-containing fluorocarbons released to the
atmosphere in recent years as aerosol propellants or refrigerants raised
questions about destruction of stratospheric ozone and ensuing health haz-
ards from increased ultraviolet radiation.  The extent to which this reac-
tion occurs is uncertain, but studies to establish the significance of the
reaction are in progress.  As a precautionary measure all nonessential
aerosol propellant uses of fluorocarbons were banned by federal regulations
in 1978.

     Consumption of fluorine in the United States is increasing rapidly
and is expected to more than triple by the year 2000 (Section 7.2).

1.1.3  Environmental Cycling and Fate

     Fluoride cycles naturally through the environment.  It moves from the
lithosphere to the atmosphere primarily by volcanism and entrainment of
soil particles (Section 8.2), but manufacturing activities are becoming
increasingly significant.  Volcanism is estimated to transfer 109 kg of
fluoride per year to the atmosphere.  In 1970, emissions from U.S. indus-
trial activities amounted to an additional 1.5 * 10° kg of fluoride.

     Atmospheric fluoride returns to the hydrosphere and lithosphere in
precipitation and by deposition of particulates.  Rainfall, which averages
0 to 0.02 ppm fluoride in uncontaminated areas, contains 0.2 to 14 ppm
fluoride in areas near urban and industrial sources.  In one location where
much coal is burned, rainwater is estimated to add 170 g of fluoride per
hectare annually.  Global precipitation is estimated to deposit 1.2 * 10l°
kg of fluoride per year  (Section 7.3.1.2.2).

     Fluoride tends to persist in most soils.  It is strongly absorbed by
soil colloids and is not easily displaced by common anions.  In alkaline
soils fluoride is usually fixed as the insoluble calcium salt, or, if ade-
quate calcium is not present, as aluminum silicofluoride.  In very alkaline

-------
soils the sodium salt may be formed.  Losses from runoff and leaching are
relatively small averaging 0.5% to 6% annually in typical forest and agri-
cultural areas (Section 7.4.1).

     Dissolved and particulate fluorides from natural and industrial
sources are transported to the sea primarily by flowing water; as a con-
sequence, world rivers average about 0.09 to 0.2 ppm fluoride (Section
7.3.3).  Seawater contains ten times as much fluoride as rivers.  Oceanic
sediments are richer still, averaging about 730 ppm.  Some 4 to 6 * 1011
g of fluoride is withdrawn from the sea annually by incorporation into
calcium carbonate or calcium phosphate.  This removal results in an aver-
age fluoride residence time in the ocean of 2 to 3 million years.  There
is no apparent difference in the fluoride content of sediments from the
Atlantic, Pacific, and Indian oceans (Section 7.4.2).

     Several effective and economical treatments exist for removing
fluoride from gaseous- and liquid-waste streams.  Fluorides are usually
scrubbed from gaseous wastes with water or caustic solutions.  The most
commonly used methods for removing fluoride from liquid wastes involve
precipitation of calcium or aluminum fluoride by addition of lime or alum,
followed by filtration or settling (Section 7.5).  Another frequently used
waste management technique involves absorption of ionic fluoride on ion
exchangers or alumina.  The fluoride sludge resulting from these opera-
tions is normally disposed of as landfill.  Adequate precautions against
acidification of these landfill sites are necessary to avoid inadvertent
release of solubilized or vaporized fluorides.

1.1.4  Biological Aspects in Microorganisms

     Many microorganisms, such as bacteria, fungi, yeast, algae, protozoa,
and viruses, are known to metabolize fluoride or fluoride-containing com-
pounds.  A few strains of bacteria can utilize fluoride compounds as
catabolites.  Microorganisms may contain relatively high concentrations
of fluoride.  Some samples of oral bacteria contain up to 134 ppm, and
accumulations up to 900 ppm fluoride may occur in lichens grown near an
industrial pollution source such as an aluminum smelter.  In most in-
stances, fluoride appears to be only loosely bound to microbe cells and
can be removed or reduced in concentration by washing with water or other
solvents (Section 3.2).  There is no evidence that fluoride is essential
to microorganisms.  In fact, excessive concentrations are toxic, but dif-
ferent species exhibit different tolerances.  Toxic effects of fluoride
on microorganisms include developmental and morphological alterations,
growth inhibition, and reduction in infectivity.  These effects occur
primarily through interference with respiratory, photosynthetic, ionic
transport, and glycolysis processes.  Higher molecular weight compounds
and  compounds containing more chlorine than fluorine seem to be most toxic
to microorganisms.  Dormant bacterial spores are more resistant than vege-
tative cells to fluoride aerosols (Section 3.3).  The laboratory substi-
tution of p-fluorophenylalanine and 5-fluorouracil for their unfluorinated
analogs  in bacterial proteins and nucleic acids interferes with subsequent
vital biological  processes, such as protein reduction, RNA and DNA syn-
 thesis,  and  cell  differentiation; it also causes chromosomal alterations,

-------
changes in ribosomal composition and properties, and modification in func-
tions of messenger RNA.  There is no evidence, however, that mutagenic
effects to microorganisms occur by chance, from simple fluoride compounds
normally encountered in the environment (Section 3.3.1).

1.1.5  Biological Aspects in Plants

     Fluoride is found in virtually all plants.  In unpolluted areas,
fluoride concentrations normally range from about 2 to 20 yg per gram of
dried plant matter.  Near industrial pollution sources, such as aluminum
or phosphate fertilizer producers or in soils of high fluoride content,
concentrations of fluorides in plants may be 10 to 100 times greater
(Section 4.2.4.2).  Although plants can absorb fluoride from soil, levels
of major nutrients in the soil affect the amount of fluoride absorbed
through roots, and there is not necessarily a simple direct relationship
between concentrations of fluoride in soil and plant tissues.  Uptake of
fluoride by plants is strongly pH dependent (Section 4.2.1.1).  Plants
absorb gaseous and airborne particulate fluorides via leaves; in areas
with polluted atmospheres most of the fluoride in the plant is probably
supplied in this manner.  Gaseous fluorides are more effectively absorbed
than particulate forms and lead to greater plant injury.  Tissue fluorides
increase with increased length of exposure and with increased atmospheric
concentrations.  Existing data are inadequate to determine subcellular
sites of localization; however, some evidence suggests that chloroplasts
accumulate fluoride to a greater extent than mitochondria or cell walls.
Mobility of fluoride within the plant is limited — fluoride is translocated
upward from root to shoot, but leaf fluoride is essentially fixed.  Bio-
elimination occurs through loss of leaves, twigs, and roots, leaching by
rain, and in certain plants possibly by volatilization of organofluorides
(Section 4.2.5).

     The metabolism of organic fluoride by plants is not well understood.
Some plant species synthesize and accumulate large amounts of compounds
such as fluoroacetate.  A variety of plants form trace amounts of fluoro-
acetate and fluorocitrate, but no information is available concerning
enzyme systems necessary to synthesize or degrade these organofluorides.
It is also uncertain if all plants can synthesize carbon-fluorine bonds
(Section 4.2.3).

     Although the linear growth of selected plants may be enhanced by
exposure to a few parts per billion of airborne fluoride, the presence of
fluoride in plant tissue in abnormal concentrations is generally detri-
mental.  All plants are not equally susceptible; gladiolus, apricot, and
Douglas fir are exceptionally sensitive while cherry, tomato, and wheat
are resistant.  Excess fluoride causes growth inhibition, tip and marginal
necrosis of foliage, chlorosis, wilting, and eventually death of the plant.
Fruit quality and yield can be impaired.  Inhibition of seed germination
also occurs.  Fluoride causes these effects by altering photosynthesis,
carbohydrate metabolism, respiratory and oxidative processes, RNA metabo-
lism, and calcium nutrition.  The mechanisms involved are complex and
largely unresolved in vivo, but in vitro studies suggest that many effects
result from fluoride inhibition of essential enzymatic reactions or effects
on the structural integrity of the cell (Section 4.3.1).

-------
     Fluoride appears to be mutagenic in plants.  Chromosomal abnormali-
ties, such as breakage, bridging, and stickiness, occur in a variety of
plants after treatment with concentrations of gaseous hydrogen fluoride
or aqueous sodium fluoride too low to induce immediate .visible injury.
The mechanisms by which fluoride induces chromosomal aberrations are not
known (Section 4.3.4).

1.1.6  Biological Aspects in Animals

     Animals are exposed to a variety of forms and concentrations of flu-
oride through ingestion of food and water and from the atmosphere.  Inges-
tion is the principal form of uptake by insects, aquatic and terrestrial
animals, and birds; inhalation and skin absorption contribute only negli-
gible amounts.  Fluorides are metabolized and accumulate in mineralizing
tissues of animals.  Usually, 96% to 98% of the fluoride in the body is
located in bones and teeth.  Although most mammals normally accumulate
fluoride in mineralizing tissues with age, the major portion of that
assimilated is rapidly excreted in urine.  Smaller amounts are eliminated
in feces, saliva, and perspiration (Section 5.5.1.3).

     Tolerance to fluoride differs among various animal species and among
individuals of the same species.  Birds tolerate fluorides better than
mammals (Section 5.4.2.2.4).  Based on performance, growing chicks accept
up to 300 ppm fluoride in their diet without difficulty; turkeys up to
400 ppm.  However, teratogenic effects occur when fluoride-containing
compounds (e.g., 5-fluorouracil, 5-fluoro-2'-deoxyuridine, and 5-fluoro-
orotic acid) are injected into the yolk sac during the first four days
of development of chicken embryos.  Skeletal deformation, microphthalmia,
retardation of growth of extremities, and abnormal bill development are
common malformations caused by intrayolk injections  (Section 5.4.2).

     Fluoride toxicosis of livestock usually occurs only in areas with a
fluoride pollution problem, but significant exposures can result from the
ingestion of excessive raw rock phosphate and geothermal waters rich in
fluorides (Section 5.5.1).  Acute fluoride toxicosis is rare, but chronic
fluoride toxicosis occurs in both livestock and wildlife and is an impor-
tant problem in the United States.  Dental and bone lesions, lameness, and
impaired performance are the principal manifestations of chronic fluoride
toxicosis in livestock.  Sheep and horses are more tolerant to fluoride
than cattle.  Based on chemical signs and lesions, safe levels of fluoride
in the feed of these animals are 60 ppm to 30 ppm, respectively, under
breeding or lactating conditions.  Swine appear to be the most tolerant
among domesticated mammals, tolerating up to 70 ppm fluoride in their feed
 (dry basis) without apparent injury (Section 5.5.2.4).  Feed values should
be reduced proportionally when water contains appreciable amounts of flu-
oride.  Available scientific data do not support carcinogenic effects of
fluorides in wild or domestic animals.  Water characteristics, such as pH,
hardness, and contaminants, influence the tolerance of aquatic animals to
 fluoride; sensitivity is also related to environmental acclimatization
 and  species of animal.  In general, however, concentrations of 1.5 ppm
 fluoride appear not to have harmful effects, although slightly higher
 levels may be detrimental  to some aquatic species.  For example, the 20-day

-------
median tolerance limit for some Salmo flngerlings is 2.7 to 4.7 ppm sodium
fluoride at 12.8°C, under constant-flow conditions.   Filter-feeding mol-
luscs are also very sensitive to fluoride.  Mussels  subjected to seawater
containing 10 ppm fluoride die after five-week exposures.  Growth of crus-
taceans (e.g., the crab) is reduced by exposure to water containing 20
ppm fluoride.  Muscle tissue of such animals can accumulate up to 50 ppm
fluoride — a level potentially hazardous for continual human use.  Since
fluoride concentrations of 20 ppm have been reported in estuaries where
phosphate mining operations occur, such operations can have adverse effects
on the crabbing industry.  It is worth noting, however, that the accumula-
tion of fluoride in crustaceans is reversible:  both hard and soft tissue
concentrations approach near-normal levels following exposure of these
animals to fluoride-free water for a time comparable with the contamina-
tion period (Section 5.3.2.1).

     Both inorganic and organic fluorides produce lethal and sublethal
toxicity in insects.  The LD30 for many different species varies from 100
to 300 mg of sodium fluoride per kilogram of living  weight.  Exposure to
fluoride causes either a stimulation or an inhibition of egg production
in insects, depending on the length of exposure and  concentration of the
poison.  For example, seven-day exposure of some Tribolium larvae to flour
containing 0.01% sodium fluoride stimulated egg production, compared with
controls, but a similar exposure to flour containing 0.1% sodium fluoride
inhibited egg production.  Sublethal exposures of fluoride may also cause
mutagenic effects in some insects; thus increased sex-linked recessive
lethal mutations occur in DrosophiZa melanogas'bev males after exposure
to a mixture of gas containing 10% perfluorobutene-2 and 90% air (Section
5.2.2.1.3).

1.1.7  Biological Aspects in Humans

     The biological response of humans to fluoride depends on many factors,
such as the chemical form and concentrations involved.  At trace levels
ionic fluoride may be essential; at intermediate concentrations (approxi-
mately 1 ppm) it appears beneficial; and at higher levels it is toxic.  The
essentiality of fluoride is difficult to show experimentally because of
its ubiquity and the resulting difficulty in removing fluoride from the
diet; nonetheless, trace levels of this substance may be necessary for
nucleation of crystalline material in bone (Section  6.2).  Although fluo-
ridation of public water supplies has caused controversy, most evidence
indicates that this step is beneficial and is the most cost-effective and
safest procedure of improving dental health (Section 6.4.2).  An even
higher level of fluoride than the 1.0 ppm considered optimum for caries
resistance may enable older persons to better resist osteoporosis (Section
6.4.2.3).

     Human intake of fluoride is chiefly through the diet, drinking water
usually furnishing the largest share.  Absorption of fluoride is largely
passive; the amounts retained depend on the solubility of  the fluoride
compound (Section 6.3.1.2).  Absorbed fluoride is rapidly  distributed
across membranes and into tissues; however, bone is the major storage site.
Bones accumulate fluoride as fluorapatite or possibly, to  a lesser extent,

-------
as magnesium fluoride, throughout the lifetime of an individual.  The rate
decreases with age (Section 6.3.2.2).  Fluoride sequestered by bone during
periods of excess intake is released to the blood and excreted through the
kidneys when the level of intake subsides.  Some fluoride is eliminated in
sweat, and small amounts pass through the mucosa of the intestines into
the gut.

     Long-term ingestion of water containing fluoride at levels above 8
ppm causes skeletal fluorosis osteofluorosis, in about one in ten persons.
In most cases, the skeleton does not deteriorate and functions normally,
both structurally and metabolically.  When fluorosis is severe, bone
changes occur and may be accompanied by crippling, impaired locomotion,
and pain.  Fluoride salts are lethal when taken orally in doses of about
3 g (Section 6.4.3).  Aspects of fluoride poisoning leading to death are
blockage of respiratory enzymes, interference with necessary body functions
controlled by calcium, specific organ damage, and general collapse (Section
6.4.3.2).  Some of these effects are reversible.  If proper prompt treat-
ment is provided, not only may the patient be saved, but recovery without
sequelae is possible.  In the case of exposure to HF or F2, the extremely
corrosive nature of these substances adds further damaging effects to their
general fluoride toxicity (Section 6.4.3.3).  Absorbed as fumes or vapors,
they cause extreme irritation to the lungs, resulting in edema and tissue
damage as well as systemic toxic effects.

     Except for accidental ingestion of fluoride salts, most U.S. residents
are exposed to fluorides chiefly from industrial or occupational contacts.
Usually, threshold limit values have been established for such exposures,
and exposure levels are monitored by air, food, and water sampling, and
urine analyses.  At concentrations normally encountered by the general
public, fluoride is not teratogenic, mutagenic, or carcinogenic (Section
6.4.4).  However, some concern exists over possible teratogenic or other
reproductive effects of fluorinated anesthetics among chronically exposed
persons such as operating room personnel  (Section 6.4.3.6.2).  Continued
study of the risk-benefit factors for such uses appears warranted.

1.1.8  Food Web Interactions

     The movement of natural fluorides in the food chain has been exam-
ined only in a very preliminary manner and is not well established.  The
available data indicate a 20- to 50-fold increase of fluoride in the femurs
of herbivores (e.g., deer mice) relative to forage values, and smaller
increases — perhaps 2- to 5-fold — in skeletons of predators of these
herbivores.  The increased uptake of fluoride in the diets of predators
presumably results from consumption of prey skeletons since only trace
levels  of fluoride occur in the soft tissues.  Because the fractional
consumption of skeletal tissues by predators decreases higher in the food
chain,  localization of fluoride in skeletal tissues effectively limits
the transfer  of  fluoride in most species, and biomagnification is not a
serious problem.  Thus animals grown for human consumption generally do
not significantly increase human uptake of fluoride.

-------
1.2  CONCLUSIONS

      1.  Fluoride occurs in detectable concentrations in most rocks,
          soils, and waters, as well as plant and animal tissues.

      2.  Normal mineral soils contain 200 to 300 ppm fluoride.

      3.  Uncontaminated surface waters usually contain no more than 0.3
          ppm, but seawater of normal salinity averages 1.4 to 1.5 ppm
          fluoride.

      4.  Most urban and almost all nonurban air contains environmentally
          insignificant amounts of fluoride (<0.05 vig/m3).

      5.  Fluorite (CaF2) is the most abundant and economically important
          fluoride mineral.

      6.  Hydrogen fluoride (HF) is the most important manufactured fluo-
          ride and is probably the greatest single industrial fluoride
          contaminant of the atmosphere.

      7.  Most fluoride emissions to the atmosphere occur in the manu-
          facturing of phosphorus and phosphate fertilizer, the operation
          of aluminum- and steel-producing furnaces, the production of
          brick and tile products, and the combustion of coal.

      8.  Liquid-fluoride wastes are generated primarily in the production
          of glass products, pesticides, fertilizers, aluminum,  steel and
          inorganic chemicals, and in metal-processing industries.

      9.  Fluoride is usually removed from aqueous wastes by the addition
          of lime or alum, followed by filtration of the resulting calcium
          or aluminum precipitate, or by absorption on ion exchangers or
          alumina.

     10.  Volatile fluorides are usually fixed by scrubbing gaseous wastes
          with water or caustic solutions.

     11.  Good analytical methods are available for determining fluoride
          in environmental samples at concentrations down to the parts-
          per-billion level.

     12.  Low concentrations of fluoride in water (approximately 1 ppm)
          benefit mammalian systems, making bone and tooth apatite less
          soluble.

     13.  Excess fluoride reacts with some complexable polyvalent cations
          in biological systems, preventing normal enzymatic reactions
          and causing cellular death.

     14.  Ingestion is the principal form of uptake of fluoride by
          insects, aquatic and terrestrial animals, and birds; inhalation
          and skin absorption contribute only negligible amounts.

-------
                              10
15.  Acute fluoride toxicosis of livestock is rare, but chronic
     fluoride toxicosis of both livestock and wildlife is an impor-
     tant problem in many areas of the United States.

16.  The principal manifestations of chronic fluoride toxicosis in
     livestock are dental fluorosis, osteofluorosis, lameness, and
     impaired performance among domestic animals.  Dairy cattle are
     the most sensitive to excessive fluorides.

17.  Fluoride accumulates in the hard tissues of animals — approxi-
     mately 98% of the body burden is incorporated in teeth and bones.

18.  Concentrations of 1.5 ppm fluoride in seawater appear not to
     have harmful effects on marine animals, but higher levels are
     frequently detrimental.

19.  Plants absorb some soluble fluoride from the soil via roots,
     while atmospheric gases and particulates are absorbed in and
     collected on leaves and stems.  The latter mechanism predomi-
     nates in areas near aluminum, steel, and fertilizer manufacturers.

20.  Excess fluoride in or on plants causes growth inhibition, plant
     damage, reduced quality and yield of fruit, and fluoride toxi-
     cosis in grazing animals.

21.  The metabolism of fluoride by plants is not well understood;
     however, it is established that excess fluoride in plants inter-
     feres with photosynthesis, carbohydrate metabolism, respiratory
     and oxidative processes, KNA metabolism, and calcium nutrition.

22.  There is not necessarily a simple, direct correlation of fluo-
     ride in soil and plant tissues.  Uptake is strongly pH dependent.

23.  The LD30 for many species of insects ranges between 100 and 300
     mg of sodium fluoride per kilogram of living weight.

24.  Biomagnification of fluoride occurs at the lower end of the food
     chain but is limited by localization of fluoride in skeletal tis-
     sues.  Therefore, it does not significantly increase human uptake.

25.  Human intake of fluoride is chiefly through the diet (drinking
     water).

26.  Water containing approximately 1 ppm of fluoride appears bene-
     ficial to human life, but higher concentrations may be toxic.

27.  Long-term ingestion of water containing more than 8 ppm of
     fluoride causes fluorosis in humans.

28.  Fluoride salts are lethal to humans when ingested in doses of
     about 3 g.

-------
                              11
29.  Except for accidental ingestion of salts, most U.S. residents
     are exposed to fluorides chiefly from industrial or occupational
     contacts.  However, waters with high fluoride content are impor-
     tant sources of exposure in some countries such as India and
     Africa.

30.  At concentrations normally encountered by the general public,
     fluoride is not teratogenic, mutagenic, or carcinogenic to
     humans.

31.  Continued study of the risk-benefit factors for the use of
     fluorinated anesthetics is warranted.

-------
                                SECTION 2

              CHEMICAL AND PHYSICAL PROPERTIES AND ANALYSIS

2.1  SUMMARY

     Fluorine is a common element, ranking 13th in abundance and consti-
tuting 0.06% to 0.09% of the earth's crust.   Because of its small atomic
radius and large number of electrons, fluorine has the greatest surface
charge density of any element; consequently, it is highly reactive and
only rarely occurs naturally in elemental form.  Fluorine is widely dis-
seminated, however, in ionic or combined forms; it appears in detectable
concentrations in most rocks, soils, waters, and plant and animal tissues.
Even rural air samples normally carry traces of fluoride.

     Fluorine and its derivatives have large and growing uses in many
industrial processes and products, and various fluorides occur as by-
products or wastes.  The chemical forms most frequently encountered are
fluorine gas, hydrogen fluoride, alkali fluorides, silicon tetrafluoride,
sodium fluorosilicate, fluorocarbons, uranium hexafluoride, Group VIA
element fluorides, halogen fluorides, and the minerals cryolite, fluor-
apatite, and fluorspar.

     On the basis of quantity produced, hydrogen fluoride is the most
important manufactured fluoride (292,000 metric tons in 1977); it is the
intermediate from which all other fluoride compounds, including fluorine,
are prepared.  Hydrogen fluoride is obtained by treating the mineral fluor-
spar with sulfuric acid.  Because of its extensive use, hydrogen fluoride
is probably the greatest primary fluoride contaminant of the atmosphere.
Owing to its great reactivity, however, it is unlikely to remain in this
form very long.

     Fluorination of organic compounds and products constitutes the
greatest single use of fluorides in the United States.  In 1977, approx-
imately 108,000 metric tons of hydrogen fluoride was used in the synthesis
of dichlorodifluoromethane, trichlorofluoromethane, tetrafluoromethane,
tetrafluoroethylene, vinyl fluoride, hexafluoropropene, and similar prod-
ucts.  These compounds are used chiefly for aerosol propellants, refriger-
ants, and fluorinated plastics.  In 1978, nonessential uses of fluorocarbon
propellants were banned, and this segment of the fluorocarbon market shrank
to about 2% of its previous value.  Smaller quantities of other fluorocar-
bons find specialized uses as inhalation anesthetics, fire extinguishing
agents, cleaners, and degreasers.  Other large users of hydrogen fluoride
include the aluminum industry, uranium isotope enrichment plants, the
petroleum industry, and stainless steel pickling operations.

     Most fluoride emissions to the atmosphere occur in the manufactur-
ing of fertilizer and phosphorus from rock phosphate^ the operation of
aluminum- and steel-producing furnaces, the*manufacturing of brick and
tile products, and the combustion of coal.  In general, these wastes take
the form of hydrogen fluoride, fluorine, boron trifluoride, fluorosilicic
                                   12

-------
                                   13
acid, sodium fluorosilicate, aluminum fluoride, calcium fluoride, lead
difluoride, fluorapatite, silicon tetrafluoride, and fluoride particulates,
Liquid-waste streams containing appreciable quantities of fluoride are
generated by glass manufacturers, pesticide and fertilizer producers,
steel and aluminum makers, metal processing industries, and inorganic
chemical producers.  Usually this fluoride is in the form of hydrogen
fluoride or fluoride ion, depending on the pH of the waste stream.

     Techniques for sampling environmental sources for fluoride are reason-
ably well established, except for the partitioning of airborne gaseous and
particulate fluorides.  A variety of good analytical methods are available
for determining fluoride in these samples.  The widely used spectrophoto-
metric procedures based on the zirconyl-SPADNS, or similar, reagent are
now being rapidly superseded by the relatively new fluoride ion electrode.
The latter technique has comparable or better precision and accuracy and
is more rapid and convenient than previous analytical methods for most
types of fluoride samples.  Fluoride in environmental samples can also be
determined by polarographic, enzymatic, and activation analysis techniques.
However, these methods are competitive with the electrode technique only
under specialized circumstances.

2.2  PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL PROPERTIES

     Fluorine is unique among the elements in the variety of forms its
compounds can take; many inorganic gases and salts exist, as well as a
large and growing number of organic compounds.  Some of these compounds
interact significantly with the environment (Cholak, 1959a, 19592?) and
are pertinent to this study; the most important of these are fluorine,
hydrogen fluoride, alkali fluorides, fluorspar, cryolite, fluorapatite,
silicon tetrafluoride, sodium fluorosilicate, fluorocarbons, organic
fluorides, and Group VIA fluorides.  Pertinent physical and chemical
properties of these compounds are discussed in the following sections.

2.2.1  Fluorine

     Fluorine ranks 13th in abundance among the elements and constitutes
0.06% to 0.09% of the earth's crust (Leech, 1956, p. 3).  First isolated
in 1886 by Moissan, elemental fluorine remained largely a laboratory curi-
osity until World War II, when nuclear energy requirements stimulated
commerical production (Weast, 1978).  It is now produced in high tonnages.

2.2.1.1  Physical Properties — Fluorine (F2) is a pale yellow acrid gas
that freezes to a colorless solid at -219.6°C and boils at -188.2°C; its
heat of formation and energy of dissociation are 18.9 and 37.7 kcal/mole
respectively (Nikolaev et al., 1972).  The density of the gas is 1.69 g/
liter (15°C, 1 atm); at -188°C, the density of the liquid is 1.51 (Weast,
1978), and the dielectric constant is 1.517 at -189.95°C (Neumark and
Siegmund, 1966).  Physical properties of fluorine are listed in Table 2.1.

-------
                                      14
                     TABLE 2.1.   PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF FLUORINE
                     Property
                  Value
           Melting point (mp)

           Boiling point (bp)

           Transition temperature,  solid

           Critical temperature

           Critical pressure

           Density, solid

           Refractive index, liquid at bp

           Surface tension,  liquid
             At -193.26°C
             At -206.95eC

           Heat of transition, solid

           Heat of fusion

           Heat of vaporization at  bp

           Viscosity, liquid
             At -187.96°C
             At -203.96°C

           Viscosity, vapor
             At 0°C, 760 mm  Hg

           Dielectric constant
             At -189.95eC
             At -215.76"C

           Thermal conductivity, gas
             At 0°C, 760 mm  Hg
      -219.62°C
      -188.14°C
      -227.61°C
      -129.00°C
      55 atm
      1.90 g/cm*
      1.2

      14.81 dynes/cm
      18.85 dynes/cm
      173.90 cal/g-mole
      121.98 cal/g-mole
      1561.3 cal/R-mole

      0.257 cP
      0.414 cP

      0.0218 cP

      1.517 e
      1.567 e

      5.92 x 1Q-3 cal/(sec)(cma)(°C/cm)
                Source:  Adapted from Neumark and Siegmund,  1966, Table 1,
           p. 506.  Reprinted by permission of the publisher.
2.2.1.2  Chemical Properties — Although  the effective nuclear charge of
the  fluorine atom is not  as great  as that  for some other elements,  the
effective surface charge  density of the  fluorine  atoms is  greater  than
that  of any other element because  of its small radius (Durrant and  Durrant,
1962).   As a result, fluorine is the most  electronegative  and reactive of
all  elements (Weast, 1978).

      The standard oxidation potential for  the reaction
2F
                                        F2 +  2e
is -2.85 V vs  the normal hydrogen electrode (Horton, 1961).   Fluorine
combines directly at ordinary or elevated temperatures with  all elements
other than oxygen and nitrogen  (Banks and Goldwhite, 1966).   When  finely
dispersed, water, glass, ceramics, carbon,  and metals all  burn in  fluorine
with a bright  flame  (Weast, 1978).  Fluorine reacts with water to  form
hydrogen fluoride and oxygen difluoride,  with nitric acid  to yield the

-------
                                   15
 explosive gas fluorine nitrate, and with sulfuric acid  to  form fluoro-
 sulfuric acid.  It reacts violently with most organic molecules, usually
 with dissociation (Merck, 1976).

      Because of the low quantum number and the simple electronic config-
 uration of the fluorine atom, its ability to form diverse bond  formations
 is  restricted; the only common states for the fluorine atom in  combination
 are the ionic form, F~, and the covalent tetrahedral form  (Durrant and
 Durrant, 1962).   Some characteristics of these forms are described below.

 2.2.1.2.1  Ionic fluorides — Fluorine reacts with metallic elements to
 form compounds which are usually ionic, both in the crystalline state and
 in  solution; they have characteristically high melting and boiling points
 (Table  2.2).  Most of these salts are readily soluble in water; however,
 lithium, aluminum, strontium, barium, magnesium, calcium, and manganese
 fluorides are sparingly soluble or insoluble (Latimer and Hildebrand,
 1951).   The poor solubility of the last three salts has important phys-
 iological consequences in cases of acute fluorosis.
                    TABLE 2.2. PROPERTIES OF SOME IONIC FLUORIDES
Substance
Aluminum fluoride
Calcium fluoride
Cesium fluoride
Lithium fluoride
Magnesium fluoride
Manganese fluoride
Potassium fluoride
Rubidium fluoride
Sodium fluoride
Sodium fluoroalumlnate
Sodium fluorosllicate
Uranium tetrafluorlde
Formula
A1F,
CaFa
CsF
L1F
MgF,
MnF,
KF
RbF
NaF
NajAlF.
NaaSiF,
UF»
Color
White
White
White
White
White
Red
White
White
White
White
White
Green
Melting
point
<°C)
1040
1360
682
842
1225
856
846
775
988
1000
Decomposes
960
Boiling
point
(°C)
1291
2500
1251
1676
2260

1505
1410
1695



Density,
25eC
(g/ml)
3.07
3.18
4.115
2.601
3.0
3.98
2.48
3.557
2.558
2.90
2.679
6.7
Solubility
In water, 18°C
(g/100 ml)
0.559 (25°C)
0.0016
367
0.133 (25"C)
0.0076
0.66 (40"C)
92.3
130.6
4.22
0.034 (15°C)
0.652 (17eC)
Slightly soluble
     Source: Compiled from Horton, 1961, and Weast, 1978.
     Fluoride ion also has a strong  tendency  to  form complexes with heavy
polyvalent cations in aqueous solution  (Horton,  1961;  Thomas and Alther,
1966):
Fe

Al

Mn

Mn
                             3 +
                             3 +
                             3 +
                             2 +
6F

6F

5F

3F
                                            3-
FeF6-  ,

A1F63- ,

MnF32~ ,
                                       MnF
                                            2-

-------
                                   16
This behavior, and the previously mentioned formation of insoluble fluo-
rides, are chiefly responsible for the biological toxicity of inorganic
fluorides.

2.2.1.2.2  Covalent fluorides — Fluorine and hydrogen fluoride react
with nonmetallic elements to form covalent compounds, such as hydrogen
fluoride, fluorine monoxide, silicon tetrafluoride, sulfur hexafluoride,
organic compounds containing fluorine, and complex anionic forms.  Because
of the small size of the fluorine atom and its high electronegativity,
most elements exhibit their highest oxidation state as fluorides.  When
all valence-shell electrons of such atoms form covalent bonds with fluo-
rine, increase in coordination number by the formation of ionic crystals
is impossible.  Crystals of such compounds consist of simple molecules
held together by van der Waals forces.  Accordingly, in contrast to ionic
fluoride compounds, covalent compounds of fluorine tend to have low melt-
ing points and high volatility (Durrant and Durrant, 1962).  The melting
points, boiling points, and other physical properties of a wide variety
of covalent fluorides are given in Table 2.3.

2.2.1.3  Occurrence and Synthesis — Because of its great reactivity, ele-
mental fluorine does not usually occur free in the environment and, when
introduced, does not long persist unreacted; its occurrence is soon marked
by the formation of fluorinated reaction products.

     Elemental fluorine is produced on a commercial scale by the elec-
trolysis of a molten solution of potassium fluoride in anhydrous hydrogen
fluoride.  Fluorine gas is formed at the anode, and hydrogen is formed
at the cathode:
                             2HF -»• H2
Some fluorocarbons are also produced during the electrolysis because the
anode is made of carbon; however, the main impurity in the product is
normally hydrogen fluoride.  The latter is removed by passing the product
through absorption towers packed with sodium fluoride (National Academy
of Sciences, 1971).

2.2.2  Hydrogen Fluoride

     First prepared in the anhydrous state by Fremy in 1856 (Gall, 1966),
hydrogen fluoride (HF) is now a widely used industrial chemical.  Because
of this extensive use, hydrogen fluoride is probably the greatest single
atmospheric fluoride contaminant.  Due to its great reactivity, however,
hydrogen fluoride is unlikely to remain in its original form very long.

2.2.2.1  Physical Properties — Hydrogen fluoride is a colorless, pungent
liquid or gas that boils at 19.5°C and freezes near -83°C (Weast, 1978).
Its heat of formation and energy of dissociation are 64.5 and 140 kcal/mole
respectively (Nikolaev et al., 1972).  Hydrogen fluoride is highly soluble
in water and alcohol and fumes strongly in contact with the atmosphere.

-------
                         TABLE 2.3.  PROPERTIES OF SOME COVALENT FLUORIDES
Substance
Ammonium fluoride
Chlorine tri fluoride
Dichlorodifluoromethane
Disulfur decafluoride
Fluoroacetic acid
Hexafluoropropene
Hydrogen fluoride
Oxygen di fluoride
Silicon tetrafluoride
Sulfur hexafluoride
Sulfur tetrafluoride
Tetrafluoroethylene
Tetrafluoromethane
Trichlorofluoromethane
Uranium hexafluoride
Vinyl fluoride
Formula
NHi,F
C1F9
CClaFa
SaFio
FCHaCOOH
C9F6
HF
OF a
SiF«,
SF6
SF*
C2F<,
CF<,
CClaF
UF6
CaH3F
Color
White
Colorless
Colorless
Colorless
Colorless
Colorless
Colorless
Colorless
Colorless
Colorless
Colorless
Colorless
Colorless
Colorless
Colorless
Colorless
Melting
point
(°C)
a
-82.6
-158
-92
35.2
-156.2
-83.1
-223.8
-90
-50.4
-125.0
-142.5
-150
-111
69.5
-160.5
Boiling
point
(°c)

12.0
-30
29
165
-29.4
19.5
-144.8
-86
-65a
-40.0
-76.3
-129
23.7
56*
-72.2
Density
(g/ml)
1.009 (25°C)
2.04 (-50°C)
1.75 (-115°C)
2.08 (0°C)
1.369 (36°C)
1.583 (-40°C)
1.0015 (0°C)
1.90 (-233°C)
1.66 (-95°C)
1.88 (-50°C)

1.519 (-76°C)
3.034 (0°C)
1.49 (17°C)
4.68 (21°C)

Solubility
in water
(g/100 ml)
100 (0°C)
Reacts
Soluble
Reacts
Soluble

Miscible
Slightly soluble,
reacts
Reacts
Slightly soluble
Reacts
Insoluble
Slightly soluble
Insoluble
Reacts
Insoluble
a
 Sublimes.
Source:  Compiled from Weast, 1978;  Horton,  1961;  and Merck,  1976.

-------
                                         18
The  density  of the liquid is  1.0015 at  0°C  (Horton, 1961).   The dielectric
constant of  liquid hydrogen fluoride is near  84 at 0°C;  accordingly,  its
solvent  power rivals that of  water (Moeller,  1952).  The formula  weight
of hydrogen  fluoride is  20.006, but hydrogen  bonding between molecules
causes a high degree of  association, and both the  liquid and gas  show
large departures  from  ideal behavior (Gall, 1966).  Other physical prop-
erties of hydrogen fluoride are listed  in Table 2.4.
             TABLE 2.4.  SOME PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF ANHYDROUS HYDROGEN FLUORIDE
                           Property
        Value
            Formula weight, calculated
            Molecular weight
              Saturated vapor at boiling point (bp)
              Saturated vapor at 100°C
            Boiling point at 1 atm
            Melting point (mp)
            Density
              Liquid at 25°C
              Vapor, saturated, at 25°C
            Vapor pressure at 25°C
            Heat of vaporization
              bp at 1 atm

            Heat of fusion at mp
            Heat capacity at constant pressure
              Liquid at bp
              Vapor at 25°C, 1 atm
            Heat of formation, ideal gas at 25°C
            Free energy of formation, ideal gas at 25°C
            Entropy, ideal gas, at 25°C
            Critical temperature
            Critical pressure
            Critical density
            Viscosity at 0"C
            Surface tension at bp
            Refractive index, 5893 A", at 25°C
            Molar refractivity, 5893 X, formula weight
            Conductivity at 0°C
            Dielectric constant at 0°C
            Dipole moment, HF molecule
20.006

78.24
49.08
19.51°C
-83.37°C

0.9576 g/cms
3.553 g/liter
17.8 psia

1609 cal/20.01 gfl
1785*
46.93 cal/g

12.2 cal/(20.01 g)(°C)
143 cal/(20.01 g)(°C)
-64.9 kcal/20.01 g
-65.0 kcal/20.01 g
41.5 cal/(20.01 g)(°C)
188°C
941 psia
0.29 g/cm3
0.26 cP
8.6 dynes/cm
1.1574
2.13 cm3
<1.6 * 10"* mho/cm
83.6
1.83 D
                .From vapor pressure vs temperature.
                 From calorimetry.
                Source:  Adapted  from Gall, 1966,  Table 1, p. 611.  Reprinted by
            permission of the publisher.

-------
                                   19
2.2.2.2  Chemical Properties — Anhydrous hydrogen fluoride is one of the
most acidic substances known (Horton, 1961).  It readily protonates and
dissolves even nonbasic compounds such as alcohols, ketones, and mineral
acids:
                       2HF 4- ROH -v ROH2+ + HF2~ ,

                      2HF + R2CO •*• R2COH+ + HF2~

                      2HF + HN03 -v H2N03+ + HF2
Fluorides of the alkali metals, silver, barium, ammonia, and thallium
dissolve in anhydrous hydrogen fluoride and behave as strong electrolytes.
Other metal salts, such as the halides, cyanides, and azides, react with
anhydrous hydrogen fluoride to form the fluoride and the corresponding
acid.  The latter is insoluble in hydrogen fluoride and is expelled (Banks
and Goldwhite, 1966):
                         NaCl + HF ->• NaF + HC1 .
Anhydrous hydrogen fluoride reacts with metals more positive than hydrogen
in the electromotive series, providing they do not form insoluble fluoride
films, as aluminum does.  Anhydrous hydrogen fluoride is also a strong
dehydrating agent; wood and paper are charred on contact, and aldehydes
undergo condensation by elimination of water (Gall, 1966).

     In dilute aqueous solution, hydrogen fluoride is a weak acid; only
about 10% is ionized in 0.1 M solutions.  This behavior is unusual com-
pared with the other hydrogen halides and is attributed to the high bond
strength in hydrogen fluoride (Banks and Goldwhite, 1966) (bond energies:
hydrogen fluoride, 135; hydrogen chloride, 103; hydrogen bromide, 87;
hydrogen iodide, 71 kcal/mole).  Aqueous hydrogen fluoride (hydrofluoric
acid) is best known for its ability to dissolve glass:
                       4HF + Si02 •* SiFi, + 2H20 .
     Anhydrous hydrogen fluoride, both gaseous and liquid, and higher
concentrations of aqueous hydrofluoric acid are all very corrosive to
skin, eyes, lungs, and mucous membrane; extreme care should be taken to
avoid contact with these materials.  With dilute solutions of hydrofluo-
ric acid, burns of the skin may not be evident when exposure occurs but
may later become apparent by deep-seated ulceration (Gall, 1966).

2.2.2.3  Synthesis and Use — Based on quantity of production, hydrogen
fluoride is the most important manufactured compound of fluorine; it is
used directly or as an intermediate in the preparation of almost every

-------
                                  20
fluoride-containing product (Gall, 1966).  Hydrogen fluoride is made in-
dustrially by treating the mineral fluorspar with concentrated sulfuric
acid:
                      CaF2 + HaSO*. -»• CaSO« + 2HF  .
The volatile gas is condensed, purified by distillation, and stored in
steel tanks and cylinders (Gall, 1966).  About 292,000 metric tons were
produced in the United States in 1977, primarily as anhydrous liquid or
gas (Chemical Marketing Reporter, 1978Z?) .  Approximately 40% of this total
was used to manufacture aluminum, and 37% was converted into fluorocarbon
compounds and products.  The remainder was used chiefly in processing ura-
nium (7%), in alkylation catalysts in petroleum refining (5%), in manufac-
turing fluoride salts (4%), and in stainless steel pickling operations
(4%).  Smaller quantities were used as fluxes in metal casting, welding,
and brazing operations; etching agents in the glass and ceramics indus-
tries; cleaners in metal finishing processes; pesticides; and, of course,
for fluoridation of water, toothpaste, and other products.

2.2.3  Fluorspar, Cryolite, and Fluorapatite

     The principal fluoride-containing minerals are fluorspar (CaF2), cry-
olite (3NaF»AlF3), and fluorapatite [CaF2»3Ca3(P0ll)2].  Their theoretical
fluoride contents are 48.5%, 54.5%, and 3.8% respectively.  Commercially,
fluorspar is the most important mineral with workable deposits occurring
in all major countries.  World production in 1975 exceeded 4,150,000 metric
tons (Quan, 1976).  Almost 29% of this amount (1.2 million metric tons)
was consumed in the United States.  Physical properties of the purified
form of the mineral are listed in Table 2.5.  Cryolite is a relatively
rare mineral which is an essential raw material in the aluminum industry;
its chief physical characteristics are given in Table 2.6.  Commercially
important deposits of this material were found only in Greenland, and these
are now exhausted; present supplies are prepared synthetically (National
Academy of Sciences, 1971).  Fluorapatite is a constituent of rock phos-
phate; it contains only a small percentage of fluoride and is presently
unimportant as a commercial source of fluorine.  Rock phosphate has great
environmental significance, however, as well as potential commercial impor-
tance in the future, because it is mined and consumed in vast quantities
in the production of elemental phosphorus and phosphate fertilizers.  Wood
(1975) estimated the fluorine content of the phosphate rock mined annually
in the United States as 729,000 metric tons.  It is estimated that all
forms of fluoride emissions to the atmosphere from phosphorus and phosphate
fertilizer production in the United States amounted to more than 16,300
metric tons in 1968 (National Academy of Sciences, 1971, p. 9).

     Fluorspar,  cryolite, and fluorapatite are essentially insoluble in
water; accordingly, the mammalian toxicity of these compounds is moderate
to  low.  Their toxicity toward insects is much more pronounced, however,
and  synthetic cryolite is sometimes used as an insecticide for the control
of  chewing  insects, such as the  codling moth, the Mexican bean beetle,
flea beetles, and  tomato worms  (Metcalf, 1966).

-------
                                   21
            TABLE 2.5.  PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF CALCIUM FLUORIDE
                  Property
           Value
Melting point (mp)
Boiling point (bp)
Heat of fusion
Heat of vaporization at bp
Vapor pressure at 2100"C
Specific heat at constant pressure
  Solid at 25°C
  Solid at op
  Liquid at mp
Entropy at 25"C
Heat of formation, solid at 25°C
Free energy of formation, solid at 25"C
Thermal conductivity, crystal at 25°C
Density
  Solid at 25*C
  Liquid at mp
Thermal expansion, average, at 25°C to 300°C
Compressibility at 25°C, 1 atm
Hardness
  Mohs scale
  Knoop, SOO-g load
Solubility In water
  At 25eC
  At 175"C
Refractive index at 24°C, 5893 A
Dielectric constant at 30°C
Electrical conductivity
  Solid at 20°C
  Solid at 650°C
  Solid at mp
1402*C
2513"C
5.5 kcal/mole
80 kcal/mole
7.6 nnn

16.02 cal/(mole)(°C)
30.0 cal/dnoleX'C)
23.9 cal/(mole)(°C)
16.46 cal/(mole)("C)
-290.3 kcal/mole
-278.1 kcal/mole
0.0262 cal/sec(cma)(°C/an)

3.181 g/cms
2.52 g/cm*
22.3 x 10-*/eC
1.24 x lO-'/atm

4
158

0.0017 g/100 g water
0.0018 g/100 g water
1.43382
6.64

1.3 x 1Q-li mho/cm
6 x 10"s mho/cm
3.45 mho/cm
     Source:  Adapted from Gall, 1966, Table 1, p. 574.  Reprinted by
permission of the publisher.

-------
                                     22
                  TABLE 2.6.  PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF CRYOLITE
                      Property
         Value
Formula weight
Composition, calculated
  Fluorine
  Aluminum
  Sodium
Melting point (mp)
Transition temperature
  Monoclinic to cubic
  Second-order
Vapor pressure, liquid, at 1009°C

Heat of fusion at 1009°C
Heat of vaporization at 1009°C

Heat of transition
  Monoclinic to cubic at 560°C
  Second-order at 880°C
Heat capacity
  Monoclinic crystal at 25°C
  Cubic crystal at 560"C
  Liquid at 1009"C
Entropy, monoclinic crystal at 25°C

Heat of formation, monoclinic crystal at 25°C

Free energy of formation, monoclinic crystal at 25°C

Density
  Monoclinic crystal at 25°C
  Cubic crystal from x-ray data, at 560"C
  Solid at 1009"C
  Liquid at 1009°C

Hardness, Mohs scale
Optical properties
  Refractive index
    Alpha form
    Beta form
    Gamma form
  Biaxial character
  Axial plane
  Angle of acute bisectrix to C axis
Electrical conductivity
  Liquid at 1009°C
  Solid at 400°C

Viscosity, liquid, at  1009°C
Surface tension,  liquid in air, at 1019°C

Solubility in water
  At 25°C
  At 100"C
209.94

54.30*
12.85Z
32.85Z
1009

560eC
881 °C

1.9 mm Hg
26.7 kcal/mole
54


2.22 kcal/mole
<0.2 kcal/mole

51.6 cal/(mole)(°C)
65.0 cal/(mole)(eC)
96.8 cal/(mole)(°C)
57.0 cal/(mole)(°C)

-788.9 kcal/mole

-750.1 kcal/mole

2.97 g/cm*
2.77 g/cm*
2.62 g/cms
2.087 g/cms
2.5
1.3385
1.3389
1.3396
Positive
Perpendicular to (010)
43°54'
2.83 IT* cm"1
4.0 x ID'* n" cm'1
6.7 cP
125 dynes/cm

0.042 g/100 g
0.135 g/100 g
     Source:  Adapted from Call, 1966, Table 2, p. 536.  Reprinted by
permission of Che publisher.

-------
                                   23
2.2.4  Alkali Fluorides

     The alkali fluorides have the formula MF, where M represents lithium,
sodium, potassium, rubidium, or cesium.   The alkali fluorides are typical
salts; they have high melting and boiling points and, except for the lith-
ium and sodium compounds, are fairly soluble in water.   Other physical
properties are listed in Table 2.2.   All of the fluorides, except lithium,
absorb hydrogen fluoride to give acid fluorides of the type MHF2 (Banks
and Goldwhite, 1966).  This reaction is  reversible for the sodium and
potassium salts; on strong heating they  dissociate to yield the normal
salt (Durrant and Durrant, 1962):
                             KHF2 = KF + HF .
This reaction is often used to produce small quantities of anhydrous
hydrogen fluoride in the laboratory.

     Sodium fluoride is the most important member of the alkali fluoride
group.  It is a white crystalline powder that melts at 988°C and boils at
1695°C (Weast, 1978).  It is prepared by neutralizing aqueous hydrofluoric
acid with sodium carbonate.  The commercial product is only 90% to 95%
pure because of the presence of fluorosilicates and other impurities
derived from the aqueous hydrofluoric acid (Merck, 1976).

     Sodium fluoride is widely used in fluxes, for fluoridation of water
supplies, and for scrubbing hydrogen fluoride from fluorine; it is also
occasionally used as an insecticide and a wood preservative (Rudge, 1962).

     Documentation of fatalities caused by accidental fluoride poisonings
shows that sodium fluoride, more than any other compound, is the toxic
agent (Eagers, 1969).  To prevent the confusion of sodium fluoride with
common edible materials such as flour, powdered milk, and baking powder,
some states require insecticidal grades of sodium fluoride to be tinted
blue green (Merck, 1976).

2.2.5  Silicon Tetrafluoride and Fluorosilicic Acid

     Silicon tetrafluoride is a colorless gas that melts at -90°C, boils
at -86°C (Weast, 1978), and has a pungent odor reminiscent of hydrogen
chloride (Merck, 1976); it is very toxic (Roholm, 1938).  Other properties
are listed in Tables 2.7 and 2.8.  The gas has little utilitarian value;
its environmental significance is due to its formation in large quantities
during the combustion of coal and the manufacture of normal and triple
superphosphate fertilizers, elemental phosphorus, wet-process phosphoric
acid, aluminum metal, and brick and tile products.  The total fluoride
emission to the atmosphere in the United States in 1968 from the above
sources, was estimated to be nearly 63,500 metric tons  (National Academy
of Sciences, 1971).  The exact fraction of the total attributed to sili-
con tetrafluoride is difficult to determine with certainty, but silicon
tetrafluoride is known to be the chief gaseous pollutant in many of the

-------
                                       24
manufacturing  steps.  For example,  normal  and triple superphosphate  fer-
tilizers are prepared by treating rock phosphate with sulfuric acid  and
phosphoric acid respectively:
    CaF2«3Ca3(PO<,)2 +  7H2SO<, + 3H20 •> 3CaH<,(PO«)2«H20 + 7CaSO<, + 2HF
and
CaF2«3Ca3(PO<,)2  + 14H3PO<,  + 10H20
                                                           2»H20 + 2HF  .
In  each instance, the  resulting  hydrofluoric acid  reacts further with
silica in the  rock phosphate to  produce  silicon tetrafluoride:
                   4HF +  Si0
                                                2H20  .
In  modern production plants, off-gases are scrubbed with water, and most
of  the silicon tetrafluoride is  removed  as fluorosilicic acid (Banks  and
Goldwhite, 1966):
                       3SiF<, + 2H20 -+ 2H2SiF6 + Si02
However, large quantities of silicon tetrafluoride  and hydrogen fluoride
escape to the  atmosphere in older manufacturing plants.
             TABLE 2.7.  SOME PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF SILICON TETRAFLUORIDE
                          Property
                                                   Value
           Melting point (triple point), 1318 mm
           Boiling point
           Density of gas at 0°C and 1 atm
           Molar refraction
           Heat of capacity at constant pressure
           Critical temperature
           Critical pressure
           Heat of formation at 25°C
           Heat of sublimation at 177.7"K and 1 atm
           Heat of fusion at 182.9°K and 1320 mm
           Heat of vaporization at 182.9°K and 1320 nan
           Heat of dissociation
           Vapor pressure, log p, mm
           Sublimation pressure, log p, mm
                                             -90.2°C
                                             -95.0'C
                                             4.69 g/liter
                                             8.40
                                             18.2 cal/(mole)(°C)
                                             14.15 ± 0.02°C
                                             36.66 ± 0.05 atm
                                             -370 kcal/g-mole
                                             6.15 kcal/g-mole
                                             1.69 kcal/g-mole
                                             4.46 kcal/g-mole
                                             232 kcal/g-mole
                                             8.453-957.0/T
                                             10.469-1352.8/T
                Source:  Adapted from Byrns,  1966, Table 1,  p. 651.
           Reprinted by permission of the publisher.

-------
                                    25
                  TABLE 2.8.  SOLUBILITY OF SILICON TETRAFLUORIDE
                              IN VARIOUS SOLVENTS

                                       Silicon tetrafluoride
                        Solvent               content
                                         (g/100 g solvent)


                 Acetic acid                    1.1
                 Acetone                       3.1

                 Butyl alcohol                  23.4

                 Ethyl alcohol,  absolute          36.4

                 Ethyl alcohol,  95X              38.1

                 Glycerol                      5.7
                 Glycol                        26.2

                 Isopropyl alcohol               28.2

                 Methanol                      32.8


                     Source: Adapted from Byrns, 1966, Table 2,
                 p. 651.  Reprinted by permission of the publisher.
     Fluorosilicic acid (H2SiF6), which is formed from the reaction of
silicon tetrafluoride and water, is extremely toxic  (Waldbott, 1963).  The
acid is very water-soluble and is readily absorbed by  vegetation.  Concen-
trated solutions  are corrosive to glass, ceramics, some metals, and metal
oxides (National  Academy of Sciences, 1971).  Fluorosilicic acid is some-
times used  in hardening cement, preserving timber, manufacturing enamels,
and preserving  oil pigments (Merck, 1976).  Small amounts of the sodium
salt of fluorosilicic acid (Na2SiF6) are used as an  insecticide; it is
said to be  more potent as an insecticide and less toxic to higher animals
than sodium fluoride (Metcalf, 1966; Rudge, 1962).   The physical properties
of some inorganic fluorosilicates are shown in Table 2.9.

2.2.6  Halogen  Fluorides

     Fluorine reacts with other halogens to form the interhalogen compounds
shown in Table  2.10.  Although some interhalogen compounds have been known
for well over a hundred years, those containing fluorine are relatively
new and are still the objects of considerable research (Emeleus, 1969).

     The halogen  fluorides are very active compounds that react with
most metals and nonmetals as vigorously as elemental fluorine (Banks and
Goldwhite,  1966); consequently, they are not normally  present in the envi-
ronment.  They  are occasionally released, however, in  chemical laboratories
and in certain  rocket-engine jtest firings (National  Academy of Sciences,
1971).  Such gases are rapidly hydrolyzed by moisture  in the air to form
hydrogen fluoride, oxygen, and other products.

     Halogen fluorides are synthesized in the laboratory by direct union
of the elements,  variations in reaction conditions determining the partic-
ular species formed when alternative combinations are  possible.  Chlorine

-------
                                  TABLE 2.9.  PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF SOME INORGANIC FLUOROSILIGATES
Fluorosillcate
Aluminum
Ammonium
Barium
Calcium
Cuprlc
Ferrous
Lithium
Potassium
Sodium
Formula
Ala(SlF.),.9H,0
(NH*)»S1F.
BaSiF,
CaSiF.«2HaO
CuSiF«-6HjO
FeSiF..6H,0
Li,SiF«.2H,0
K,SiF«
Na,SlF«
Appearance
Hexagonal prisms
Colorless, cubic
Colorless, rhombic needles
White, tetragonal
Blue, rhombic, efflorescent
Pale blue green, trigonal
White, monoclinic
Colorless, cubic
Colorless, hexagonal
Specific
gravity

2.011
4.279
2.662
2.270
1.961
2.33
2.746
2.755
Refractive Index Solubility
u E (g/100 ml)
Very soluble
(cold)
1.3692 18.58 (17.5°C)
0.025 (25eC)
10.58 (22°C),
decomposes
1.4092 1.4080 233 (17"C)
1.3638 1.3848 128.2
1.300 1.296 73 (17°C)
1.339 0.177 (25°C)
1.312 1.309 0.762 (25°C)
Solubility
In alcohol

Soluble
Insoluble
Soluble
Slightly
soluble
Insoluble
Soluble
Insoluble
Insoluble
In acetone

Insoluble
Insoluble


Insoluble
Insoluble


Source:  Adapted from Byrns, 1966, Table 3, p. 658.  Reprinted by permission of the publisher.

-------
                                    27
              TABLE 2.10.  HALOGEN FLUORIDES:  TYPES AND BOILING POINTS


             AB           ABS          AB,              AB7


         C1F (-101°C)   GIF, (12eC)    C1F5         IF7 (277°C, sublimes)

         BrF (20°C)     BrF, (126°C)    BrFs (41°C)
                                   IFS
             Source: Adapted from Emele'us, 1969, p. 11.  Reprinted by
         permission of the publisher.
trifluoride  (C1F3) is probably  the most  frequently used halogen fluoride.
It is colorless as a gas, yellow green as  a liquid, and white as a solid.
Chlorine trifluoride boils near 12°C  and melts at -83°C; its odor is sweet
and suffocating.  The specific  gravity of  chlorine trifluoride is 1.82 at
20°C (Bryce, 1964).  Glass wool and organic matter burst into flames on
contact with chlorine trifluoride, and even quartz is attacked if traces
of moisture are present.  Chlorine trifluoride is used in nuclear reactor
fuel processing, as a fluorinating agent in chemical reactions, and as an
igniter and propellant  for rockets  (Merck,  1976).

2.2.7  Group VIA Fluorides

     Fluorine reacts with the Group VIA  elements  to form a variety of
fluorides.  Most of these compounds are  infrequent contaminants of the
environment.  Only the  following compounds  are of interest here:  oxygen
difluoride, sulfur tetrafluoride, disulfur  decafluoride, and sulfur
hexafluoride.

     Oxygen difluoride  (OF2) is a toxic, colorless gas sometimes used as
a high-energy oxidizer  in rocket-propulsion systems.  Oxygen difluoride
can also occur in laboratory or manufacturing operations when fluorine
reacts with dilute aqueous sodium hydroxide solutions (Emele'us, 1969) or
when halogen fluorides  are hydrolyzed (National Academy of Sciences, 1971).
Oxygen difluoride melts at -223.8°C and  boils at  -145.3°C (Streng, 1963).
It does not attack glass in the cold, reacts only slowly with water, but
corrodes mercury.  Unlike fluorine  and hydrogen fluoride, oxygen difluoride
is not readily detectable by smell  and causes no immediate discomfort even
in potentially lethal concentrations; however, it is considered the most
dangerous of the gaseous inorganic  fluorine compounds (Lester and Adams,
1965).  Other properties of oxygen  difluoride are listed in Table 2.11.

     Sulfur tetrafluoride  (SF*) is  a  colorless gas that reacts violently
with water and attacks  glass but not  quartz or mercury.  It melts at
-121°C, boils at -40.4°C, and  is thermostable to 600°C; other physical
properties are given in Table  2.12.   It  is prepared on an industrial scale
by treating  sodium fluoride with sulfur  dichloride in acetonitrile at 70
to 80°C  (Merck, 1976).   Sulfur  tetrafluoride is a unique fluorinating agent
for organic  compounds;  it directly  replaces carbonyl oxygen with fluorine.
Accordingly, sulfur  tetrafluoride is  mainly used in the laboratory and

-------
                                          28
                        TABLE 2.11.  SOME PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF
                                   OXYGEN DIFLUORIDE
                           Property
                                                     Value
                    Formula
                    Formula weight
                    Color

                    Freezing point
                    Boiling point
                    Critical temperature
                    Critical pressure
                    Critical density
                    Heat of formation
                    Heat of vaporization
                    Dipole moment
                    Density
                      Gas, normal temperature
                       and pressure
                      Liquid at melting point
OFa
54.0
Colorless (gas), pale
  yellow (liquid)
-223.8CC
-145.3°C
-58.0'C
48.9 atm
0.553 g/ml
7.6 kcal/mole
2.65 kcal/mole
0.1759 D
2.41 mg/ml
1.932 g/ml
                         Source:  Adapted from Streng, 1963, Table  I,
                    pp.  608-609.  Reprinted by permission of the
                    publisher.
                        TABLE 2.12.  SELECTED PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF
                                  SULFUR TETRAFLUORIDE
                            Property
                                                      Value
                    Melting point (rap)
                    Boiling point (bp)
                    Critical temperature
                    Surface tension at bp
                    Dipole moment
                    Heat of formation
                    Molar heat of vaporization
                    Trouton's constant
-40.4°C
90.9°C
19.85 dynes/cm
0.632 D
-171.7 i 2.5 kcal/g-mole
6320 cal
27.1
                        Source:  Adapted from Brown, 1966, Table 5, p.
                    671.  Reprinted by permission of the publisher.
chemical  manufacturing operations to prepare gem-d±fluorides  from  aldehydes
and ketones and to  convert carboxylic acids to  trifluoromethyl compounds
(Banks and Goldwhite, 1966).   Sulfur tetrafluoride is very poisonous; its
toxicity  is comparable with that of  phosgene  (Merck, 1976).
      Disulfur  decafluoride (S2F10) is a  dense  colorless  liquid that melts
at  -92°C  and boils  at 29°C (Weast, 1978).   Other physical properties are
listed in Table 2.13.  Disulfur decafluoride  occurs  as a toxic by-product

-------
                                     29
                      TABLE 2.13.  SOME PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF
                             DISULFUR DECAFLUORIDE


                            Property               Value


                  Melting point                  -92°C

                  Boiling point                  29°C

                  Trouton's constant              23.0

                  Surface tension at 0°C           13.9 dynes/cm

                  Liquid density at 0°C           2.08 g/ml

                  Specific electrical conductivity   10"" mho/ml

                  Dielectric constant at 10°C       2.030

                  Heat of vaporization            7 kcal/g-nole


                      Source: Adapted from Brown, 1966, Table 6,
                  p. 673. Reprinted by permission of the publisher.
when sulfur  is  treated with fluorine; it can also  be formed by the partial
decomposition of  sulfur hexafluoride in high-voltage electric discharges
(National Academy of Sciences, 1971).  Disulfur  decafluoride is very reac-
tive and is  considered more toxic than fluorine  (Eagers,  1969).

     Unlike  sulfur tetrafluoride and disulfur decafluoride, sulfur hexaflu-
oride (SF6)  is  nontoxic and chemically inert (Banks  and Goldwhite, 1966).
It is prepared  by burning sulfur in fluorine and washing  the product with
aqueous alkali  to remove the unwanted tetrafluorides and  decafluorides.
The colorless gas, which melts at -50.4°C and sublimes  at -65°C under 2.21
atm absolute pressure, is widely used as a dielectric in  high-voltage elec-
trical equipment  (National Academy of Sciences,  1971).   Several additional
properties of this compound are listed in Table  2.14.

2.2.8  Organic  Fluorides

     Covalently bound fluorine so closely resembles  hydrogen that it
is possible, in principle, to synthesize fluorine  analogs for almost all
of the presently  known hydrocarbons and their derivatives; already, sev-
eral thousand fluorine-containing organic compounds  have  been prepared
(Banks and Goldwhite, 1966).  The chemical and physiological properties
of many of these  compounds differ greatly from those of their hydrocarbon
counterparts.   These differences stem largely from the  greater electro-
negativity of fluorine, compared with hydrogen,  which makes the covalent
carbon-fluorine bond much stronger (approximately  116 kcal/mole) than
the similar  carbon-hydrogen bond (approximately  99 kcal/mole) (Barry and
Norbury, 1974).   Of the many potentially interesting organic fluorides,
this report  can consider.here only two classes:  fluorocarbons and natur-
ally occurring  monofluoro aliphatic compounds.

2.2.8.1  Fluorocarbons — Technically, the term fluorocarbon refers to
compounds containing only carbon and fluorine.   It is used here, however,
in its popular  sense which encompasses, additionally, compounds contain-
ing the other halogens or hydrogen or both.

-------
                                        30
                    TABLE 2. lit.  PROPERTIES OF SULFUR HEXAFLUORIDE
                       Property
          Value
          Chemical formula
          Molecular weight
          Critical temperature
          Critical pressure
          Critical density
          Triple-point  temperature
          Triple-point  pressure
          Boiling point at 1.0133 x 10s N/ma
          Melting point
          Transition temperature
          Density of solid at -91.15°C
          Coefficient of thermal expansion of
            liquid at melting point
          Heat of formation of gas at 25°C
          Free energy of formation of gas at 25°C
          Heat of sublimation at -63.7°C
          Heat of fusion
          Heat of transition
          Entropy of gas at 25°C
          Heat capacity ratio of gas at 25°C
            and 1.0133  x 10s N/m3
          Velocity of sound at 0°C and
            1.0133 x 10s N/ma
          Dielectric constant of gas at 25°C
            and 1.0133  x 10s N/ma
          Refractive index of gas at 2S°C and
            1.0133 x ios N/ma
          Threshold limit value
SF.
146.0504
45.54°C
37.600 x 10s N/ma
736.0 kg/m'
-50.0°C
2.3267 x 10s N/ma
-68.0°C
-50.7°C
-179.15°C
2550.0 kg/ms
-1.2217 x io» J kg-mole"1
-1.1177 x 10' J kg-mole'1
2.2860 x 107 J kg-mole'1
5.0242 x io4 J kg-mole'1
1.6077 x io« J kg-mole"1
2.9187 x io5 J kg-mole'1 C"1

1.29

131.2 m/sec

1.002049

1.000766
1000 ppm (6 x 10~S kg/ms)
               Source: Adapted from Horvath, 1975, Table 9.1, p.  118.  Reprinted
           by permission of the publisher.
      Fluorocarbons  are prepared by  various  techniques.   The most direct
method is based on  fluorination of  a vaporized hydrocarbon using elemental
fluorine.  The reaction is  highly exothermic and  must be performed in  the
presence of  inert gas diluent in a  metal-packed reactor  that can remove
excess heat  before  thermal  dissociation of  the product occurs.   Less ener-
getic reaction conditions are possible in certain instances, by  replacing
the  fluorine gas with less  potent fluorinating agents, such as hydrogen
fluoride, cobalt(III) fluoride, silver(II)  fluoride, antimony(III) fluo-
ride, chlorine monofluoride,  or chlorine trifluoride.  For some  products,
the  method of choice involves an entirely different technique —  the elec-
trolysis between nickel electrodes  of a solution  of the  organic  compound in
anhydrous hydrogen  fluoride.   A potential of 5 to 6 V is usually applied.

-------
                                   31


Hydrogen is evolved at the cathode, and fluorination of the dissolved com-
pound takes place at the anode; no anodic gas is formed.  Usually, all
hydrogen atoms  in the dissolved compound are replaced with fluorine, double
bonds are saturated, fragmentation of the molecule occurs, and functional
groups are retained.  See Banks and Goldwhite (1966), Emeleus (1969), Fed-
eral Task Force on Inadvertant Modification of the Stratosphere  (1975),
Rudge (1962), and Sargent and Seff1 (1970) for extensive discussions of
these preparatory procedures.

     Fluorination of organic compounds and products constituted  the great-
est single use  of hydrogen fluoride in the United States in 1968; about
90,700 metric tons was used that year for that purpose  (National Academy
of Sciences, 1971).  By 1977, U.S. consumption of hydrogen fluoride had
grown to 108,000 metric tons, resulting in the production of 386,000 met-
ric tons of fluorocarbons (Chemical Marketing Reporter, 1978a, 1978£>).
The fluorocarbons, which were used chiefly for aerosol propellants (24%),
refrigerants (39%), solvents (11%), and blowing agents  (12%), included
dichlorodifluoromethane, trichlorofluoromethane, tetrafluoromethane, tet-
rafluoroethene, vinyl fluoride, and hexafluoropropene.  The first three
compounds of this group have high chemical stability, low toxicity, low
boiling points, and vapor pressures suitable for propellants or refriger-
ants.  The last three compounds are unsaturated and can be polymerized into
solids that have exceptionally low coefficients of friction and remarkable
chemical inertness.  The physical properties of these and related compounds
are summarized  in Table 2.15.  In 1978, nonessential uses of fluorocarbon
propellants were banned by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, and
this segment of the fluorocarbon market shrank to about 2% of its former
value.  As a consequence, the total U.S. market for fluorocarbons was
expected to decline to about 309,000 metric tons in 1978 and perhaps even
further in 1979.  However, annual increases of 5% to 6% are projected for
overall fluorocarbon demand from 1980 through 1983 (Chemical Marketing
Reporter, 1978a).

     In addition to the major uses of fluorocarbons cited above, numerous
minor applications also exist such as fire extinguishing agents  (CF3Br,
CF2Br2, and CF2BrCl), inhalation anesthetics (CF3CHBrCl), and specialized
cleaners and degreasers (CF2C1CFC12) (Banks and Goldwhite, 1966; Rudge,
1962).

     Although saturated compounds of carbon and fluorine are neither toxic
nor narcotic, many of the higher unsaturated compounds of carbon and fluo-
rine or of carbon, hydrogen, fluorine, and other halogens are very toxic
(Rudge, 1962).

2.2.8.2  Fluoroacetate and Fluorooleic Acid — Thousands of synthetically
prepared organic compounds containing fluorine are known, but only a few
occur naturally.  Historically and physiologically, the most important of
these are the monofluoroaliphatic compounds, fluoroacetic acid (FCH2COOH)
and u-fluorooleic acid [F(GH2)8CH=CH(CH2)7COOH(<2£s) ].  Fluoroacetic acid
is the toxic principle in the leaves of various species of Dichapetalum,
Acaciat Gastrolobiwn, and Palicourea (Smith, 1970); it melts at  35.2°C,
boils at 165°C, and is soluble in water and alcohol (Weast, 1978).  At
the pH of cell sap, the compound presumably exists as the fluoroacetate.

-------
                                      TABLE 2.15.  SOME PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF ALIPHATIC FLUOROCARBONS
Compound
Trichlorofluoromethane
Dichlorodif luorome thane
Chlorotrlfluoronethane
Dlchlorofluo rone thane
Chlorodif luororae thane
Chlorofluoromethane
Tetraf luorome thane
Tr if luorome thane
Dif luorome thane
Fluoromethane
Hexaf luoroethane
Pen taf luoroethane
1,1,1 ,2-Tetraf luoroethane
1 , 1 ,1-Trif luoroethane
1 ,1-Dif luoroethane
Fluoroethane
Tetraf luoroethene
1,1, 2-Trif luoroethene
1 , 1 -Dif luoroethene
Fluoroethene (vinyl fluoride)
Octafluoropropane
Hezafluoropropene
Formula
CC1,F
CClaF,
CC1F,
CHClaF
CHClFa
CHaCIF
CF.
CHF,
CH,Fa
CHjF
CF»-CF»
CHFa-CF,
CHaF-CF,
CHa-CF,
CHs-CHFa
CHa-CHaF
CFa-CFa
CHF-CFa
CHa~CF»
CHa^HF
CF,-CTa-CF»
CFaCF-CFa
Molecular
weight
137.38
120.93
104.47
102.93
86.48
68.48
88.01
70.02
52.03
34.03
138.02
120.03
102.04
84.04
66.05
48.06
100.02
82.03
64.04
46.05
188.03
150.02
Boiling
point

-------
                                   33
     Unlike inorganic fluorides, fluoroacetic acid is not poisonous, per
se; it has little or no effect on isolated enzymes or those organized in
mitochondria (Bartlett and Barron, 1947).  However, fluoroacetic acid is
readily metabolized to fluorocitric acid.  One of the isomers of fluoro-
citric acid irreversibly complexes aconitase which prevents the conversion
of citric acid to aconitate, disrupts the Krebs cycle, and causes metabolic
death of the cell (Goldman, 1969).  Fluoroethanol (FCH2CH2OH), which also
is not intrinsically toxic, has an apparent odor of toxicity as great as
fluoroacetate because of its metabolic conversion to the latter (Pattison
and Peters, 1966).  The sodium salt of synthetically produced fluoroacetic
acid was formerly used extensively in the United States for the control of
rats and other mammalian pests ("rodenticide 1080").  However, its manu-
facture and use in interstate commerce for predator control was banned by
the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1972).  Accidental ingestion of
this compound has resulted in several human fatalities (Sollmann, 1957)
(see Section 6).

     (D-Fluorooleic acid occurs in the seeds of Dionapetalwn toxicarium,
along with traces of lower u-fluorocarboxylic acids containing an even
number of carbon atoms in their chain.  The presence of these trace com-
pounds suggests that a>-fluorooleic acid is built up in steps of two carbon
atoms from the lower fatty acids, beginning with fluoroacetate (Pattison
and Peters, 1966).  Like fluoroacetate, u-fluorooleic acid inhibits aco-
nitase in kidney mitochondrial preparations, causes citrate accumulation
in the tissues, and is toxic to mammals.  Although the lower odd-numbered
carbon acids show little or no toxicity, all the lower even-numbered car-
bon acids are poisonous.  These circumstances correspond to the Knoop rule
for the degradation of fatty acids and suggest that the toxicity of the
even-numbered carbon compounds is due to their ultimate degradation to
fluoroacetate (Pattison, 1959).

2.2.9  Uranium Hexafluoride

     In the United States, isotopically enriched uranium required for
nuclear reactor fuel and nuclear weapons is obtained by processing uranium
hexafluoride in gaseous diffusion plants (Drury, 1967, p. 85).  Preparation
of the necessary uranium hexafluoride requires large amounts of hydrogen
fluoride; in 1974 about 9000 metric tons was used for this purpose (Ck&n-
iedl and Engineering News, 1975).

     Uranium hexafluoride can be prepared from naturally occurring uranium
oxides by a variety of processes; the method used for large-scale produc-
tion is dictated by economic considerations.  Currently, a series of chem-
ical steps are employed.  The trioxide is first reduced to the dioxide by
treatment with hydrogen gas at 700°C:
                               H2 •* U02 + HaO

-------
                                     34
The  resulting  dioxide is converted to  the  tetrafluoride with hydrogen
fluoride at 500°C:
                          U02 + 4HF •* UFA + 2H20 .
The  latter is  then converted  to the final  product by  treatment with  fluo-
rine at 350°C:
                              UF
F2 -* UF6
The  intermediate  product, uranium tetrafluoride, is a  green crystalline
solid that melts  at 960°C.  It  is only poorly soluble  in water and  is
relatively inert  chemically (Simons, 1964).
      Uranium hexafluoride is  a  colorless,  extremely corrosive, crystal-
line solid that sublimes at 56°C and melts at 69.2°C under 2 atm pressure
(Rudge,  1962).  Other physical  properties  are listed in  Table 2.16.   Ura-
nium hexafluoride is a very reactive, toxic  compound,  a  powerful oxidizer,
and  a strong fluorinating agent (Banks and Goldwhite,  1966;  Eagers,  1969).
Uranium  hexafluoride attacks  glass and quartz,  but not copper, nickel,
aluminum,  or silver; it is also unreactive to oxygen,  nitrogen, chlorine,
bromine, and saturated fluorocarbons (Simons,  1964).
                      TABLE 2.16.  SOME PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF
                              URANIUM HEXAFLUORIDE
                   Formula
                   Formula weight
                   Color
                   Melting point
                   Boiling point
                   Density
                   Dipole moment
                   Dielectric constant
                   Surface tension
                   Heat of formation
                    Solid
                   Heat of vaporization
                   Heat of fusion
                   Heat of sublimation
 UF.
 352.07 g
 Colorless to pale yellow
 69.5°C
 56°C (sublimes)
 4.68 g/ml at 21°C
 0.0 D
 4.2 x 10" e'1
 15.6 dynes/cm at 80eC

 -516 kcal/mole at 25°C
 6.907 kcal/mole at 64"C
 4.588 kcal/mole at 64°C
 11.495 kcal/mole at 64°C
                       Source:  Compiled from Horton, 1961, and
                   Mattson, 1970.

-------
                                   35
     Although large quantities of uranium hexafluoride are handled at
atomic energy installations and industrial plants, stringent control
measures are applied because of the radioactivity of the uranium, and as
a result few emissions to the environment occur (National Academy of
Sciences, 1971).

2.3  ANALYSIS FOR FLUORIDE

2.3.1  Sampling and Sample Preparation

     Fluorides occur in the environment as organic and inorganic gases,
liquids, and solids.  Specialized techniques are required to obtain repre-
sentative samples of the various forms, and certain precautions are neces-
sary to avoid contamination of, or loss of fluoride from, these samples.
The principal requirements for handling the various sample types are dis-
cussed in the following sections.

2.3.1.1  Fluoride in Air — Hydrogen fluoride, silicon tetrafluoride, and
particulates such as sodium and calcium fluorides constitute the chief
inorganic fluoride contaminants of air (National Academy of Sciences,
1971).  Fluorine, because of its great reactivity, is rarely present in
elemental form.  Concentrations of fluoride in excess of 1.5 yg/m3 seldom
occur in nonindustrial atmospheres; the usual range is from less than 0.05
to 0.5 yg/m9 (Katz, 1968; Thompson, McMullen, and Morgan, 1971).  Higher
concentrations are found near facilities manufacturing steel, aluminum,
phosphorus, phosphate fertilizers, bricks, pottery, and ceramics, as well
as near large coal-fired power plants.  Samples may be collected manually
or automatically.  Manual techniques include sorption of fluorides on
beads or tubing coated with sodium bicarbonate or other basis compounds,
or use of a liquid-filled bubbler (Figure 2.1) or impinger-type collector
(Figure 2.2) with or without a prefilter to remove particulate fluorides
(Jacobson and Weinstein, 1977).  Countercurrent scrubbers and spray col-
umns are also utilized.  Usually, at least 1 to 10 m3 of air are processed.
Bubblers and scrubbers normally contain water or a solution of sodium or
potassium hydroxide; the resulting fluoride solution may be further proc-
essed, prior to analysis, as decribed in Section 2.3.1.2.  Automated equip-
ment for determining gaseous fluorides in air are also available.  These
instruments extract gaseous fluoride constituents from air with absorbing
liquids or solids during a specified sampling period, then flush the sample
into a cell where the fluoride ion concentration is measured by a specific
ion electrode whose signal is amplified and displayed on a recording device
(Jacobson and Weinstein, 1977).  Particulate fluorides are prefiltered and
are not determined in presently available instruments.  When it is impor-
tant to determine particulate fractions of the sample, fractionation is
usually accomplished by prefiltering the air sample (Mandl et al., 1971;
Pack et al., 1959).  The partl'culate matter generally requires fusion with
alkali hydroxide to convert it into a soluble form prior to separating the
fluoride for analysis (Intersociety Committee on Methods for Ambient Air
Sampling and Analysis, 1969).  Sampling devices and procedures are dis-
cussed in detail by the American Industrial Hygiene Association  (1972) ,
Hendrickson (1968), Israel (1974), Jacobson and Weinstein (1977), MacDonald
(1970), Marshall and Wood (1968), and Thompson, McMullen, and Morgan  (1971).

-------
                                    36
                                                    ORNL-OWG 77-9689R
         27
         cm
                275ml
225
                  175
                  125
                   75
               5 mm-
                                     BAFFLE
                                    2.3-mm
                                  / HOLE
                    5 mm
                                                    30ml
                                                                 16
                                                                cm
                                                    20
                                      CENTERING
                                        LUGS
                                                    10
                                                     1-mm HOLE

                                        WATER. ETHYL, NORMAL PROPYL. OR
                                        ISOPROPYL ALCOHOL


     Figure  2.1.   Typical wet-impinger collector.   Source:  Adapted from
American  Industrial Hygiene Association, 1972, Figure 9-22, p. 133.
Reprinted by permission of the publisher.

-------
                                     37
                                                              ORHL-DWO 77-12899
AEROSOL
INLET
IMPACT ION
 SLIDES
                                               AEROSOL
                                               INLET
                                               IMPACTION
                                                 SLIDE
                                   CLEANED AIR
                                    OUTLET
                 LARGE JET.
                 LARGE
                 PARTICLE
                                 IMPACTION
                                   SLIDE
                                                            CLEANED AIR
                                                              OUTLET
                                                  SMALL
                                                  'PARTICLE
                                                  SMALL
                                                  'JET

                                                  SMALL
                                                  "PARTICLE
                                 IMPACTION
                                   SLIDE
                                                                      IMPACTION
                                                                       SLIDE
     Figure 2.2.  Types of dry,  cascade Impingers.   Source:  Adapted from
American  Industrial Hygiene Association, 1972, Figure  9-23, p. 134.
Reprinted by permission of the publisher.
2.3.1.2  Fluoride in Water — Fluoride usually  occurs in water in  the ionic
state.   Except for unusual circumstances, the  concentration of  fluoride in
natural waters is low — usually less than 1  ppm (Cholak, 1959a).   However,
the  concentration of fluoride in Industrial  waste streams depends on the
chemical process involved; for example, typical processing solutions from

-------
                                  38
the chemical milling of titanium metal contain about 100,000 ppm fluoride
(Staebler, 1975).  Samples are normally taken in glass or, preferably,
polyethylene containers.  Typically, storage losses are not troublesome
(Sholtes et al., 1973), but acidic samples should be handled in plastic
or other inert containers and should be treated with a known excess of
base or fixative (Horton, 1961).  When interfering ions are absent, the
fluoride determination can be made directly; however, polyvalent complex-
able cations, such as aluminum, silicon(IV), and iron(III), interfere; so
do chloride, sulfate, and phosphate (American Public Health Association,
American Water Works Association, and Water Pollution Control Federation,
1971).   For colorimetric analysis a preliminary acid distillation is rec-
ommended to free the sample of contaminants.  If the resulting distillate
is colored or turbid, the solution is made alkaline, the fluoride is
adsorbed on magnesium oxide which is removed by centrifugation, and the
preliminary distillation step is repeated with the purified product
(American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association,
and Water Pollution Control Federation, 1971).  When fluoride is deter-
mined by the electrode technique, the distillation step can usually be
eliminated [even when the sample contains such ions as aluminum, hexamet-
aphosphate, iron(III), and orthophosphate] if a citrate buffer solution
is added to the sample.  The citrate complexes the interfering cations,
releasing fluoride ion for analysis (American Public Health Association,
American Water Works Association, and Water Pollution Control Federation,
1971).

2.3.1.3  Fluoride in Soils and Minerals — This class of samples often
requires extensive preanalysis preparation, and careful manipulation is
required to avoid loss or contamination of the sample.  Samples are usu-
ally homogenized in ball or hammer mills.  Organic matter, if present,
is removed by ashing.  For soil samples, ashing is normally performed at
about 575°C, using fluoride-free calcium oxide as a fixative (Horton,
1961).   Refractory materials that do not easily dissolve in sulfuric or
perchloric acid are fused with alkali carbonate or hydroxide to convert
them to a soluble form.  Jacobson and Weinstein (1977) and Brewer (1965)
reviewed in detail the various aspects of preparing soil and mineral
samples.

2.3.1.4  Fluoride in Plant Tissues — Representative sampling of plant
material is difficult to accomplish.  Variations in composition occur,
not only in different parts of the plant but also diurnally and season-
ally.  Additionally, it is necessary to distinguish surface fluoride on
the plant from fluoride in the plant.  In general, field errors greatly
exceed laboratory errors in the analysis of plant materials; only by tak-
ing relatively large numbers of samples can the population variability
be adequately measured (Allen et al., 1974; Jacobson and Weinstein, 1977).
When collected, the samples are usually washed, dried, ashed, and fused
with alkali before the fluoride is separated for analysis.  If samples
are not to be processed immediately, they are frequently stored in a
frozen state with fluoride-free calcium oxide added to prevent loss of
fluoride.

-------
                                   39
     Various washing techniques are used.  The Intersociety Committee on
Methods for Ambient Air Sampling and Analysis (1969) recommends a gentle
30-sec bath in a polyethylene vessel containing a solution 0.05% in Alco-
nox and 0.05% in sodium ethylenediaminetetraacetate, followed by 10-sec
rinses in each of three beakers of deionized water.  Typically, drying
is performed in an oven at 70 to 80°C for 24 to 48 hr, usually without a
lime fixative.  Ashing is accomplished by heating the plant material in
a nickel, Inconel, or platinum crucible to 400 to 600°C for 2 hr.  In
many plant samples this ashing step results in refractory fluorides that
do not readily dissolve in subsequent operations; it is therefore good
technique to fuse the ashed sample with alkali carbonate or hydroxide to
ensure solubility of the residue (National Academy of Sciences, 1971).
After fusion, the melt is dissolved and the fluoride is separated for
analysis.  Also see Jacobson and McCune (1969),  Jacobson and Weinstein
(1977), and Kakabadse et al. (1971) for additional discussion of sample
handling techniques.

2.3.1.5  Fluoride in Animal Tissues — The procedures described for plant
samples are generally applicable to animal tissues, except that rapid
freezing prior to storage is desirable because of the lower stability
of animal tissues.  Also, since most soft tissues contain little silica
or aluminum, they seldom form refractory fluorides, and fusing the ashes
of these tissues with alkali carbonate or hydroxide is generally unnec-
essary.  Samples of skeletal tissues are simply  prepared; they are freed
from flesh, dried, and ashed at 500 to 600°C.   The fluoride in the residue
is then ready for separation and analysis.  After gentle evaporation to
dryness, body fluids (e.g., blood,  serum, and  urine) are treated similarly
(National Academy of Sciences, 1971); however, this procedure is not always
necessary if the specific ion electrode or diffusion methods are used to
determine fluoride concentrations.   Venkateswarlu (1975) compared ten dif-
ferent procedures for determining fluoride in  unwashed bovine and human
sera; he found results for nonionic fluoride and total fluoride erratic,
especially by diffusion methods, and recommended ashing such samples prior
to analysis.

     Reagents commonly used in large amounts in preparing plant and animal
tissue for analysis, such as alkaline fixatives, often contain sufficient
fluoride to alter the subsequent analysis drastically.  If realiable assays
are to be obtained, the utmost caution must be exercised to use fluoride-
free materials (Weddle and Maurer,  1954).

2.3.2  Separation of Fluoride

     Substances are present in many analytical samples that interfere
in the subsequent determination of fluoride.  Accordingly, except for
specific ion electrode analysis, it is common  practice to isolate the
fluoride from other constituents of analytical samples (Horton, 1961;
Jacobson and Weinstein, 1977).  Distillation,  diffusion, ion exchange,
and precipitation techniques are most frequently used.

-------
                                   40
2.3.2.1  Distillation - Until  recently, distillation was the most widely
used technique for separating  fluoride from other constituents of analyt-
ical samples  (Jacobson  and Weinstein, 1977; MacDonald, 1970; National Acad-
emy of Sciences, 1971;  Nikolaev et al., 1972).  Many variants of the method
exist, but the basic procedure (Willard and Winter, 1933) consists  of vol-
atilizing hexafluorosilicic acid from an acid solution in the presence of
glass or quartz, with steam vapor as the carrier.  A representative dis-
tillation apparatus is  shown in Figure 2.3.  Recovery of fluoride depends
on the geometry of the  container, temperature, acid, and impurities; gen-
erally, distillation from perchloric acid at 135°C is preferred.  Chloride
in the distillate interferes but can be fixed by addition of a soluble
silver salt.  Similarly, small amounts of interfering sulfate can be fixed
with a soluble barium salt; however, excess barium must be avoided  since
insoluble barium fluoride may  be precipitated (Horton, 1961).
                                              ORNL-DWG 79-20895
                       A - STEAM GENERATOR
                       B - DISTILLING FLASK
                       C - CONDENSER
                       0 - STEAM RELEASE TUBE
                       E - THERMOMETER
                       f - PLATE
                       G - RECEIVER
                       H - SAFETY TUBE
                       I - RUBBER TUBING
                       J- SOFT GLASS BEADS
                       K - BOILING CHIPS
      Figure 2.3.   Apparatus for distillation of fluoride.  Source:
Adapted  from Katz, 1977,  Figure 203.1, p. 388.  Reprinted by permission
of  the publisher.

-------
                                   41


2.3.2.2  Diffusion — The isolation of fluoride in microsamples is often
accomplished by the  diffusion method (National Academy of Sciences, 1971).
In this simple technique, an aliquot of the prepared sample is mixed with
acid and sealed in a vessel containing an alkali, which absorbs the liber-
ated hydrogen fluoride gas.  Typically, the sample aliquot contains 30 yg
of fluoride, or less, in a volume of 1 ml.  It is placed in a polyethylene
container  (Conway diffusion dish) and mixed with 2 ml of concentrated per-
chloric acid.  The microdiffusion dish is then quickly sealed with a lid
on whose inner surface 0.05 ml of alcoholic sodium hydroxide solution has
been deposited and dried.  The sealed dish is heated in a 60°C oven for 16
to 20 hr,  after which the alkaline absorbent is removed for fluoride anal-
ysis by the desired  analytical method.  An alternative arrangement is shown
in Figure  2.4.  Interfering materials that volatilize under the described
conditions must be fixed or eliminated prior to the diffusion process.
Sulfites are converted to nonvolatile sulfates by treatment with hydrogen
peroxide,  and chlorides are fixed by adding silver perchlorate (Intersoci-
ety Committee on Methods for Ambient Air Sampling and Analysis, 1969, p.
72).  Because the required diffusing time increases with fluoride concen-
tration, this method of isolating fluoride from the sample matrix is only
used for samples containing small amounts of fluoride (Horton, 1961).
Obviously, only acid-labile fluoride is collected in the diffusion method.
If other forms of fluoride are present, previously described preanalysis
procedures must be used to convert them to the acid-labile form.  See
Jacobson and Weinstein (1977), MacDonald (1970), Nicholson (1966), Singer
and Armstrong (1965), and Taves (19682?) for further discussion of the
separation of fluoride by the diffusion technique.
                                              ORNL-OWG 79-20894

                          B        .C       ^D       ^E
     Figure 2.4.  Diffusion apparatus:  (a) vaseline seal, (2?) acidified
sample, (0) plastic cup, (d) trapping solution, and (e) lid.  Source:
Adapted from Taves, 19682?, Figure 1, p. 970.  Reprinted by permission of
the publisher.
2.3.2.3  Ion Exchange — Samples may be freed of cationic contaminants by
preferentially absorbing the fluoride species on an ion exchange resin,
followed by desorption in a small volume of eluant (Jacobson and Weinstein,
1977; MacDonald, 1970; Nielsen, 1960; Nikolaev et al., 1972).  A typical

-------
                                   42
chromatographic column consists of a borosilicate tube that has an inside
diameter of 10 mm and is 16 cm long, with a fritted glass disk and a stop-
cock sealed in the base and a 100-ml reservoir attached to the top.  The
column is filled to a height of 10 to 12 cm with preconditioned 60 to 100
mesh anion exchange resin, such as Duolite A-A1, lonac A 302, Permutit A,
or Rexyn 205.  Fluoride is fixed on the resin when the acidified sample is
passed through the column; interfering cations are not absorbed and are
discarded.  The fluoride is eluted from the resin with 0.1 N sodium hydrox-
ide, and the purified fluoride solution is analyzed by a convenient method
(Intersociety Committee on Methods for Ambient Air Sampling and Analysis,
1969).  Ion exchange methods are also useful for concentrating dilute solu-
tions of fluoride.  Despite its usefulness, however, the ion exchange
method of separating fluoride appears to be little used, compared with
the distillation and diffusion techniques.

2.3.2.4  Precipitation — In general, fluoride compounds are more soluble
than salts conventionally used as precipitates in analytical chemistry
(Nikolaev et al., 1972); consequently, precipitation is now used only in-
frequently to isolate fluoride from other elements in the sample.  When
the technique is used, the precipitated species is usually calcium fluoride
or lead chlorofluoride (Horton, 1961; MacDonald, 1970; McKenna, 1951a).

2.3.2.5  Solvent Extraction — Venkateswarlu (1974)  isolated and concen-
trated fluoride from a variety of biological materials by equilibrating
acidified samples with diphenylsilanediol dissolved in toluene; the fluo-
ride is extracted into the immiscible organic solvent as fluorosilane.
The latter is then back-extracted into an aqueous sodium hydroxide solu-
tion as fluoride ion,  which can be analyzed with the fluoride ion elec-
trode or other convenient technique.   Good recoveries are obtained, and
a 30- to 50-fold increase in fluoride concentration is possible by reduc-
ing the volume of the back extract.   However, separation of fluoride by
solvent extraction sometimes yields negatively biased results (Jacobson
and Weinstein, 1977) ,  and the technique does not appear to be used
extensively.

2.3.3  Methods of Analysis

     Fluoride in environmental samples can be determined by a variety
of procedures; those which are currently important  or show promise of
future usefulness are described in this section.   The performance and
limitations of each method are emphasized rather than minute operational
details.  Summaries of the methods are given in Table 2.17.  It is impor-
tant to realize that variations in sensitivity,  precision, and accuracy
occur, not only among different methods but also among various models of
analytical instruments and among different operators (Karasek, 1975):
the tabulated data should therefore be considered representative rather
than definitive.  Performance data obtained from sources interested in
developing a new method usually reflect optimized conditions.   Interlab-
oratory comparisons, when they exist,  offer more realistic comparisons
of the various methods.

-------
                                            TABLE 2.17.  METHODS FOR DETERMINING FLUORIDE
                                                                        Analytical method
                                      SpectrophoCometry
                                              Fluoride ion electrode
                                             Titrimetry
Important application
Limit of detection
Precision (relative
  standard deviation)
Accuracy (relative
  error)
Interfering substances
Selectivity
Comments
Samples from air, water, soil, and
  biological sources
0.2 ug/ml (zirconyl-SPADNS, zirconyl
  eriochrome, cyanine R)a
0.015 ug/ml (lanthanum alizarin
  complexone)a
8.0% (830 ug/liter, zirconyl-SPADNS,
  no Interferants)/
12.8% (680 wg/liter, zirconyl-SPADNS,
  with interferants)/

1.2% (830 ug/liter, zirconyl-SPADNS,
  no interferants)/
5.9% (680 yg/liter, zirconyl-SPADNS,
  with interferants)/

Aluminum, iron(III), silicon(IV),
  chloride, sulfate, and phosphate
Ionic fluoride is determined.
Used extensively in field applica-
  tions and is well seasoned
Natural fresh and saline waters,
  industrial waste solutions,
  atmospheric gases, mists and
  particulates, soils and min-
  erals, biological fluids and
  solids
0.04 ng/ml (rainwater)*
40 ug/g (rock)tf
0.25 ng/g (air)d
0.1 ug/g (water)6
2.9% (900 ug/liter) (water)/
3.4% (1.7 ug/g) (standard
  solution)"
1.0% (684 pg/liter) (seawater)?
9.8% (94 ng/g) (rabbit plasma)1
4.9% (900 pg/liter) (water)/
2.9% (1.7 yg/g) (standard
  solution)"
0.9% (684 yg/llter) (seawater)^
2,6% (94 ng/g) (rabbit plasma)1
Extremes of pH and polyvalent
  cations, such as silicon(IV),
  iron(III), and aluminum
Only ionic fluoride is determined.
Rapidly becoming the method of
  choice for virtually all types
  of fluoride samples
Minerals, water, air, urine,
  and blood
5 to 50 yga
5% to 10% (30

1% (1
10% to 20% (50 ug)
                                                                                                                                              Co
Aluminum, barium, calcium,
  iron(III), thorium,
  titanyl, vanadyl, zirco-
  nium, phosphate, and
  sulfate ions
Only fluoride is determined.
Older method largely super-
  seded by more recent
  techniques
     jjlntersociety Committee on Methods for Ambient Air Sampling and Analysis, 1969.
      Warner and Bressan, 1973.
     ^Ficklin, 1970.
      Elfers and Decker, 1968.
     llJ.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1974.
     •'American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association, and Water Pollution Control Federation, 1971.
     fWdin, 1953.
     ^Warner, 1971.
     *.Hall et al., 1972.
     ?McKenna, 1951a and 1951*.
     *Nikolaev et al., 1972.

-------
                                   44


2.3.3.1  Spectrophotometry — This analytical method is based on the in-
creased or decreased absorbance of monochromatic light by a metal-dye
complex when the metal ion of the dye reacts with fluoride.  The amount
of absorbed light is measured with a spectrophotometer and is compared
with a previously determined calibration plot that relates light absorp-
tion to the concentration of fluoride in the sample.  Various absorption
complexes are used by different analysts; those most commonly used are the
zirconyl alizarin, the zirconyl-SPADNS or the zirconyl Eriochrome Cyanine
R compounds, and the lanthanum or cerium alizarin complexones (Jacobson
and Weinstein, 1977; MacDonald, 1970; National Academy of Sciences, 1971).
The three complexes first mentioned are highly colored initially but are
decolorized by reaction with fluoride; the initially red complexones are
converted to new, stable, blue-colored forms in the presence of fluoride
ion.  The effective range of the zirconyl-SPADNS and the zirconyl Erio-
chrome Cyanine R systems is 0.00 to 1.40 yg of fluoride per milliliter,
and the detection limit is 0.02 yg/ml.  For the lanthanum alizarin com-
plexone, these quantities are 0.00 to 0.5 ug of fluoride per milliliter
and 0.015 yg/ml respectively (Intersociety Committee on Methods for Ambi-
ent Air Sampling and Analysis, 1969, p. 79).  In a comparison involving
53 laboratories, a synthetic unknown sample containing 830 yg/liter of
fluoride and no interfering ions was determined without distillation by
the SPADNS method with a relative standard deviation of 8.0% and a rela-
tive error of 1.2%.  With distillation, the relative standard deviation
increased to 11.0% and the relative error to 2.4%.  In a similar synthetic
sample that contained appreciable quantities of interfering constituents,
the 53 laboratories determined fluoride with a relative standard deviation
of 12.8% and a relative error of 5.9% (American Public Health Association,
American Water Works Association, and Water Pollution Control Federation,
1971).  In general, aluminum, iron, phosphate, and sulfate interfere, and
their effects must be eliminated by one of the preanalysis treatments
discussed in Section 2.3.2.

     The level of precision attainable by the various modifications of the
spectrophotometric method is adequate for most environmental and industrial
applications; consequently, it has been widely used for the analysis of
samples derived from air, water, soil, and biological sources (Ashley,
1960; Bethea, 1974; Hargreaves, Ingram, and Cox, 1970; Megregian, 1954).
Now, however, it is being replaced by the more convenient fluoride ion
electrode technique (Jacobson and Weinstein, 1977; MacDonald, 1970).

2.3.3.2  Fluoride Ion Electrode — Fluoride ion concentrations can be
rapidly and precisely determined in a wide variety of samples, often
without elaborate sample preparation, by means of the fluoride ion elec-
trode.  The fluoride ion electrode (Figure 2.5) is somewhat similar to
the familiar glass pH electrode, except that the membrane is a disk of
single-crystal rare earth fluoride, such as lanthanum, praseodymium, or
neodymium fluoride (Frant and Ross, 1966).  The electrode is filled with
a solution containing both fluoride and chloride ions, and an electrical
contact is provided by a silver-silver chloride wire; it is used with a
pH meter and an external reference electrode, such as the standard satu-
rated potassium chloride-calomel type (Figure 2.6).  The crystal membrane
of the fluoride ion electrode is appreciably permeable only to the fluo-
ride ions, and the cell potential follows the Nernst equation relationship

-------
                                    45
                                                   ORNL-DWG 79-20893
                       INTERNAL
                       FILLING
                       SOLUTION*
                        Ag-Ag Cl
!                        INTERNAL
                        REFERENCE
                        ELECTRODE*
             INTERNAL
             FILLING
             SOLUTION
            »Ag-Ag Cl
             INTERNAL
            REFERENCE
            ELECTRODE
s^-
         GLASS MEMBRANE
LIQUID JUNCTION
    CRYSTALLINE
     MEMBRANE
     Figure 2.5.  Cross sections of typical selective  ion electrodes.
Source:   Babcock and Johnson,  1968, Figure 1, p. 954.  Reprinted from
JOURNAL American Water Works Association Volume 60 by  permission of the
Association.  Copyrighted 1968 by the American Water Works Association,
Inc.,  6666 W.  Quincy Avenue, Denver, Colorado  80235.
                                                       ORNL-DWG 79-2O892
                                MILLIVOLTMETER
            EXTERNAL REFERENCE
                ELECTRODE
                   R
         TEST SOLUTION
              LIQUID
             JUNCTION
                                   INTERNAL
                                  REFERENCE
                                  ELECTRODE
  INTERNAL
  REFERENCE
  SOLUTION
                 ION-SELECTIVE (MEASURING)
                      ELECTRODE
                         M
                                                         ION-
                                                        SELECTIVE
                                                        MEMBRANE
     Figure  2.6.   Potentiometric measuring circuit showing measuring (M)
and reference  (R)  electrodes and potentiometers.  Source:  Adapted from
Light and Cappuccino, 1975, Figure  1,  p.  247.  Reprinted by  permission
of the publisher.

-------
                                  46


over more than five orders of magnitude of fluoride ion activity.  The
electrode is unresponsive to most other common anions; interference by
hydroxide ion occurs, but only at concentrations equal to or greater than
the fluoride ion concentration.  This interference by hydroxide can be
minimized by controlling the pH of the sample; it causes no difficulty
at pH 5.

     The fluoride electrode measures fluoride activity, rather than con-
centration; it is therefore necessary to ensure that samples and reference
solutions are at equal ionic strengths if measurements interpretable in
terms of concentration are to be obtained (Frant and Ross, 1968).  The pH
and ionic strength requirements of the electrode are satisfied by adding
to the samples and standards a high-ionic-strength buffer that also con-
tains citrate ion or other complexing agents to preferentially complex
metal ions such as iron or aluminum, and assure that the fluoride in the
samples is available in the free, uncomplexed form (Light and Cappuccino,
1975).

     The fluoride in a sample is measured by immersing the fluoride and
reference electrodes in a solution of the dissolved sample containing the
total ionic strength adjustment buffer.  When a steady potential is estab-
lished, a meter reading is made and confirmed; if the method of standard
additions is used for calibration (Fuchs et al., 1975; Warner, 1973) addi-
tional spikes are added, new readings are made, and the original sample
concentration is determined from the response curve.  Alternatively, the
electrode potential can be converted to the fluoride concentration in the
sample by use of standard reference solutions or a previously determined
calibration curve.

     The range of the fluoride ion electrode is normally considered to be
from about 0.2 to 2.0 mg of fluoride per liter (American Public Health
Association, American Water Works Association, and Water Pollution Control
Federation, 1971); progressively longer times are required to achieve
steady readings as the lower concentration limit is approached.  However,
with proper electrode conditioning and a specialized technique, the lower
fluoride concentration limit can be reduced to less than a part per bil-
lion (Warner and Bressan, 1973).  In an interlaboratory comparison involv-
ing 111 analysts, a synthetic unknown sample containing 850 yg of fluoride
per liter and no interferants was determined by the electrode method with
an average relative standard deviation of 3.6% and an average relative
error of 0.7%.  A second unknown sample containing 750 yg of fluoride per
liter with added phosphate and carbonate interferants was determined by
the electrode method with a relative standard deviation of 4.8% and a
relative error of 0.2%.  Precision and accuracy are adequate for almost
all environmental and industrial applications.

     Because of its excellent performance, speed, and general convenience,
the fluoride ion electrode is rapidly becoming the method of choice for
determining fluoride in a wide variety of environmental and industrial sam-
ples (Devine and Partington, 1975; Erdmann, 1975; Jacobson and Weinstein,
1977; MacDonald, 1970; Melton, Hoover, and Ayers, 1974; Torma, 1975).  See
Andelman (1968) for an extensive discussion of the theory and application
of ion-selective electrodes in general.

-------
                                   47
2.3.3.3  Titrimetry — In titrimetric methods, a solution containing fluo-
ride ion and an indicating agent is titrated with a standard solution
containing an ion that forms a complex with fluoride.  When the end point
is reached and all of the fluoride is reacted, additional titrant reacts
with the indicator, producing a color change that signals completion of
this titration.  The quantity of fluoride in the sample is determined from
the volume and concentration of the titrant consumed, and the stoichiometry
of the reaction.  Thorium nitrate is the most commonly used titrant for
fluoride ion (Horton, 1961); it is useful in determining microgram to mil-
ligram quantities of fluoride.  Alizarin Red S is the most widely used
indicator for this reaction; it has a light yellow color in dilute acid
solutions that contain only alkali metal ions and fluoride ion but forms
a pink lake in the presence of uncomplexed thorium.  Ions that complex
or form insoluble compounds with fluoride or thorium interfere with the
titration and must be removed in preliminary treatments.  Aluminum, bar-
ium, calcium, iron(III), thorium, vanadyl, zirconium, titanyl, phosphate,
and sulfate ions are the principal offenders (Intersociety Committee on
Methods for Ambient Air Sampling and Analysis, 1969, p. 74).  Zirconium,
iron, aluminum, cerium, silver, and uranium(IV) solutions may also be
used as titrants (Horton, 1961).

     The precision of titrimetric methods varies in different systems;
typically, relative standard deviations of 5% to 10% are obtained with
samples containing about 30 yg of fluoride (Horton, 1961, p. 260).  Rela-
tive errors of 1% to 20% are reported for samples containing 1 to 700 yg
of fluoride (McKenna, 1951a; Nikolaev et al., 1972).

     Formerly, titrimetric methods were used extensively for the deter-
mination of fluoride in all types of samples.  During the last decade,
however, these methods have been largely superseded by the spectrophoto-
metric and fluoride ion electrode techniques.

2.3.3.4  Other Methods — Several analytical methods for determining fluo-
ride are not widely used; some have limited applications while others are
less convenient, precise, or economical than methods now in use.  These
methods are briefly described and referenced below.

     Gravimetric methods are based on the precipitation of fluoride as
the sparingly soluble calcium fluoride or lead chlorofluoride.  The dried
precipitates are weighed, and the fluoride content of the sample is cal-
culated from the weight and gravimetric factor of the precipitate.  The
method is useful for fluoride-rich minerals or compounds but is not suf-
ficiently sensitive for general environmental use.  McKenna  (1951&) dis-
cussed the technique in detail.

     The activity of some enzymes is inhibited by fluoride ion, for exam-
ple, the conversion of ethyl butyrate to butyric acid by liver esterase.
Linde (1951) used this effect to determine fluoride at the microgram  level
in body fluids by adding liver esterase to the sample, incubating it  for
5 hr, and titrating the liberated acid with sodium hydroxide.  He observed
a sensitivity of about 0.1 yg of fluoride per gram and a reproducibility
of about 0.1 to 0.2 yg of fluoride for samples containing 0.5  to  5 yg of

-------
                                   48


fluoride.  The method was later adapted to the determination of nanogram
quantities of fluoride by McGaughey and Stowell (1964).

     Direct polarographic measurement of fluoride is not feasible; how-
ever, several cations that form well-defined fluoride complexes (such as
aluminum and iron) can be determined by this technique and can provide a
basis for indirect determination of fluoride.  MacNulty, Reynolds, and
Terry (1952) developed such a method based on complexing fluoride with
excess aluminum, followed by polarographic determination of the unused
aluminum.  Concentrations of fluoride as low as 0.2 yg/g were satisfac-
torily measured.  Shoemaker (1955) also developed an indirect method of
determining fluoride polarographically, based on the reduction of the
diffusion current of a standard iron solution owing to complexation by
fluoride ion.  The procedure determines 1 yg of fluoride with a relative
error of about 15% (also see Gawargious, Besada, and Faltaoos, 1975).

     Several fluorometric techniques are based on quenching the fluores-
cence of metal-dye complexes by fluoride (Horton, 1961; Taves, 1968a);
although ultrasensitive — their detection limit is about 20 yg of fluo-
ride — they are all seriously affected by extraneous ions and are not
used much today.

     Fluoride can also be determined by indirect atomic absorption spec-
trometry techniques.   Bond and O'Donnell (1968) developed two such methods,
The first is based on depressing the absorption of magnesium in an air-
coal-gas flame with fluoride;  the second depends on enhancing the absorp-
tion of zirconium with fluoride ion.  In the absence of interfering ions,
the first method is useful over the range of 0.2 to 20 yg of fluoride
per milliliter.  The second method is applicable to the concentration
range from 5 to 200 yg of fluoride per milliliter.   Gutsche, Kleinoeder,
and Herrmann (1975) also reported a sensitive indirect atomic absorption
spectrometric method for fluoride; it is based on reacting excess sodium
vapor with the sample and measuring the resulting decrease in atomic
sodium concentration.  A detection limit of 0.8 yg of fluoride is claimed.

     A variety of nuclear activation methods have been developed to
determine fluorine.  Feldman and Battistone (1966)  measured fluoride in
bacteriological media by monitoring the 10.7-sec activity from fluorine-
20 produced in the l9F(o),Y)20F reaction.  The method is applicable to
fluoride concentrations down to about 5 yg/ml.

     Jeffery and Bakes (1967)  analyzed fluorite ores and concentrates by
irradiating samples with fast neutrons and measuring the activity of the
resulting nitrogen-16.  No sample preparation,  other than crushing, is
required.  The technique is not suitable for trace analysis.  Ohno et al.
(1970) used a photonuclear activation technique to measure fluoride in
urine.  They observed a detection limit of about 0.01 yg of fluoride and
a precision of about 10% in the range from 1 to 2 ppm.  Other nuclear
activation methods are discussed by Bressan et al.  (1974), Fiarman and
Schneier (1972), Lauff, Champlin, and Przybylowicz (1973), and Nikolaev
et al. (1972).

-------
                                  49
2.3.4  Comparison of Analytical Procedures

     There are many analytical procedures for determining fluoride; the
standard technique by which other methods are usually judged consists
of isolating the fluoride by a Willard-Winter distillation and analyzing
the resulting solution by the zirconium-SPADNS spectrophotometric method.
This well-seasoned procedure has a detection limit of about 20 yg of flu-
oride per milliliter, a characteristic precision of about 10%, and an
accuracy of about 5%; it is thus quite adequate for use with most envi-
ronmental samples (American Public Health Association, American Water
Works Association, and Water Pollution Control Federation, 1971; Inter-
society Committee on Methods for Ambient Air Sampling and Analysis, 1969:
McFarren, Moorman, and Parker, 1969).

     Despite the attractive features of the standard zirconium-SPADNS
spectrophotometric technique, it is not the method of choice for deter-
mining fluoride in most environmental and industrial samples today.  That
distinction belongs to the fluoride ion electrode method.  The popularity
and effectiveness of the fluoride ion electrode has steadily increased
since it was introduced by Frant and Ross in 1966.  Generally speaking,
no pretreatment is required for dissolved samples other than the addition
of the total-ionic-strength adjustment buffer.  However, care is required
on this point because the electrode monitors only fluoride ion activity —
bound or complexed fluoride is not detected.  The normal detection limit
of the electrode (about 0.2 mg of fluoride per liter) (American Public
Health Association, American Water Works Association, and Water Pollution
Control Federation, 1971) can be extended to less than a part per billion
by special procedures (Warner and Bressan, 1973).  The precision and accu-
racy of the electrode method equal or somewhat exceed those of the spec-
trophotometric or titrimetrie techniques for most samples.  These factors,
along with demonstrated speed and convenience, ensure the future dominance
of this method.

     In earlier years, titrimetric methods were extensively used for
determining fluoride.  In capable and experienced hands, some of the pro-
cedures, especially the thorium nitrate-alizarin Red S titration, still
produce good results.  They are, however, a great deal more time consuming
than the electrode method and are subject to greater operator variance;
consequently, they are infrequently used.

     The remaining methods of determining fluoride are mostly specialized
procedures that are appropriate for selected samples or that make use of
specialized facilities; they seem unlikely to find widespread, generalized
application.

-------
                                  50


                               SECTION 2

                              REFERENCES
 1.   Allen, S.  E.,  H.  M.  Grimshaw,  J.  A.  Parkinson,  and C.  Quarmby.
     1974.  Chemical Analysis of Ecological Materials.   John Wiley and
     Sons, New York.  565 pp.

 2.   American Industrial  Hygiene Association.   1972.   Air Pollution
     Manual, Part 1 — Evaluation, 2nd  ed.  Westmont,  N.J.  259 pp.

 3.   American Public Health Association,  American Water Works Associa-
     tion, and Water Pollution Control Federation.  1971.  Standard
     Methods for the Examination of Water and  Wastewater, 13th ed.
     American Public Health Association,  Washington,  B.C.  874 pp.

 4.   Andelman,  J. B.  1968.  lon-Selective-Electrodes — Theory and
     Applications in Water Analysis.  J.  Water Pollut.  Control Fed.
     40(11):1844-1860.

 5.   Ashley, R. P.   1960.  Zirconyl-Alizarin Chelate in Spectrophoto-
     metric Determination of Trace Amounts of  Fluorine.  Anal. Chem.
     32(7):834-836.

 6.   Babcock, R.  H., and  K. A. Johnson.   1968.   Selective Ion Electrode
     System for Fluoride  Analysis.   J.  Am. Water Works Assoc. 60:953-961.

 7.   Ball, M. C., and  A.  H. Norbury.  1974.  Physical Data for Inorganic
     Chemists.   Longman Group Limited,  London.   175  pp.

 8.   Banks, R.  E.,  and H. Goldwhite.  1966.  Fluorine Chemistry.   In:
     Handbook of Experimental Pharmacology,  Vol. 20,  Part 1, F. A.
     Smith, ed.  Springer-Verlag, New  York.  608 pp.

 9.   Bartlett,  G. R.,  and E.S.G. Barren.   1947.   The Effect of Fluoro-
     acetate on Enzymes and on Tissue  Metabolism — Its Use for the Study
     of the Oxidative  Pathway of Pyruvate Metabolism.  J. Biol. Chem.
     170:67-82.

10.   Bethea, R. M.   1974.  Improvements in Colorimetric Analysis of
     Chlorine and Hydrogen Fluoride by Syringe-Sampling Technique.
     Environ. Sci.  Technol. 8(6):587-588.

11.   Bond, A. M., and  T.  A. O'Donnell.   1968.   Determination of Fluoride
     by Atomic Absorption Spectrometry.   Anal.  Chem.  40(3):560-563.

12.   Bressan, D. J., R. A. Carr, P. J.  Hannan,  and P. E. Wilkniss.
     1974.  The Determination of Trace Metals  and Fluoride in Mineral-
     ogical and Biological Samples from the Marine Environment.  J.
     Radioanal. Chem.  19:373-381.

-------
                                  51


13.   Brewer, R.  F.  1965.  Fluorine.   In:  Methods of Soil Analysis,
     Part II — Chemical and Microbiological Properties, C. A.  Black,
     D.  D.  Evans, J. L. White, L. E.  Ensminger,  and F.  E.  Clark,  eds.
     Agronomy Monograph Series, No.  9.  American Society of Agronomy,
     Madison, Wis.  pp. 1135-1148.

14.   Brown, J. A.  1966.  Sulfur Fluorides.  In:  Kirk-Othmer  Encyclo-
     pedia of Chemical Technology, Vol. 9, 2nd ed.  John Wiley and Sons,
     Interscience Publishers, New York.  pp. 664-676.

15.   Bryce, H. G.  1964.  Industrial and Utilitarian Aspects of Fluorine
     Chemistry.   In:  Fluorine Chemistry, Vol. 5, J. E. Simons, ed.
     Academic Press, New York.  pp.  297-358.

16.   Byrns, A. C.  1966.  Inorganic Fluorine Compounds.  In:  Kirk-Othmer
     Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology, Vol. 9, 2nd ed.   John Wiley
     and Sons, Interscience Publishers, New York.  pp.  651-661.

17.   Chemical and Engineering News.   1975.  Hydrofluoric Acid  Makers
     Enjoy Good Times.  Chem. Eng. News 53:8-9.

18.   Chemical Marketing Reporter.  1978a.  Fluorocarbons.   Chem.  Mark.
     Rep. 14(6):9.

19.   Chemical Marketing Reporter.  19782?.  Hydrofluoric Acid.   Chem.
     Mark.  Rep.  14(8):9.

20.   Cholak, J.   1959a.  Fluorides:   A Critical Review:  I. The Occur-
     rence of Fluoride in Air, Food,  and Water.   J. Occup. Med. 1:501-511.

21.   Cholak, J.   19592?.  Fluorides:   A Critical Review:  II.  Analysis
     of Fluorides.  J. Occup. Med. 1:648-654.

22.   Devine, R.  F., and G. L. Partington.  1975.  Interference of Sulfate
     Ion on SPADNS Colorimetric Determination of Fluoride in Wastewaters.
     Environ. Sci. Technol. 9(7):678-679.

23.   Downing, R. C.  1966.  Fluorinated Hydrocarbons.  In:  Kirk-Othmer
     Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology, Vol. 9, 2nd.  ed.  John Wiley
     and Sons, Interscience Publishers, New York.  pp.  739-751.

24.   Drury, J. S.  1967.  Isotope Separation.  In:  Kirk-Othmer Encyclo-
     pedia of Chemical Technology, Vol. 14, 2nd ed.  John Wiley and Sons,
     Interscience Publishers, New York.  pp. 85-87.

25.   Durrant, P. J., and B. Durrant.   1962.  Introduction to Advanced
     Inorganic Chemistry.  Longman Group Limited, London.  1171 pp.

26.   Eagers, R.  Y.  1969.  Toxic Properties of Inorganic Fluorine Com-
     pounds.  Elsevier Publishing Co., New York.  152 pp.

-------
                                  52
27.  Elfers, L. A., and C. E. Decker.  1968.   Determination of Fluoride
     in Air and Stack Gas Samples by Use of an Ion Specific Electrode.
     Anal. Chem. 40(11):1658-1661.

28.  EmelSus, H. J.  1969.  The Chemistry of Fluorine and Its Compounds.
     Academic Press, New York.  133 pp.

29.  Erdmann, D. E.  1975.  Automated Ion-Selective Electrode Method for
     Determining Fluoride in Natural Waters.   Environ. Sci. Technol.
     9(3):252-253.

30.  Federal Task Force on Inadvertent Modification of the Stratosphere.
     1975.  Fluorocarbons and the Environment.  U.S. Government Printing
     Office, Washington, D.C.  109 pp.

31.  Feldman, M. H., and G. C. Battistone.  1966.  Fluorine Microdeter-
     mination by Neutron Activation Analysis:  Application to Bacterio-
     logical Media.  J. Nucl. Med. 7:140-149.

32.  Fiarman, S., and G. Schneier.  1972.  Proton Activation Analysis
     for Trace Elements.  Environ. Sci. Technol. 6(1):79-81.

33.  Ficklin, W. H.  1970.  A Rapid Method for the Determination of
     Fluoride in Rocks and Soils, Using an Ion-Selective Electrode.  In:
     Geological Survey Research 1970, Chapter C.  U.S. Department of the
     Interior, Washington, D.C.  pp. C186-C188.

34.  Frant, M. S., and J. W. Ross, Jr.  1966.  Electrode for Sensing
     Fluoride Ion Activity in Solution.  Science 154:1553-1554.

35.  Frant, M. S., and J. W. Ross, Jr.  1968.  Use of a Total Ionic
     Strength Adjustment Buffer for Electrode Determination of Fluoride
     in Water Supplies.  Anal. Chem. 40(7):1169-1171.

36.  Fuchs, C., D. Dorn, C. A. Fuchs, H. Henning, C. Mclntosh, and F.
     Scheler.  1975.  Fluoride Determination of Plasma by Ion Selective
     Electrodes:  A Simplified Method for the Clinical Laboratory.  Clin.
     Chim. Acta 60:157-167.

37.  Gall, J. F.  1966.  Hydrogen Fluoride.  In:  Kirk-Othmer Encyclo-
     pedia of Chemical Technology, Vol. 9, 2nd ed.  John Wiley and Sons,
     Interscience Publishers, New York.  pp. 610-625.

38.  Gawargious, Y. A., A. Besada, and B. N. Faltaoos.  1975.  Indirect
     Polarographic Microdetermination of Fluorine in Fluoro-Organic Com-
     pounds After Oxygen-Flask Combustion.  Anal. Chem. 47(3):502-505.

39.  Goldman, P.  1969.  The Carbon-Fluorine Bond in Compounds of Bio-
     logical Interest.  Science 164(3884):1123-1130.

40.  Gutsche, B., H. Kleinoeder, and R. Herrmann.  1975.  Device for
     Trace Analysis for Fluorine in Reaction Tubes by Atomic-Absorption
     Spectroscopy.  Analyst  (London) 100(1188):192-197.

-------
                                  53
41.  Hall, L. L., F. A. Smith, 0. H. De Lopez, and D. E. Gardner.  1972.
     Direct Potentiometric Determination of Total Ionic Fluoride in Bio-
     logical Fluids.  Clin. Chem. 18(12):1455-1458.

42.  Hardin, L. J.  1953.  Report on Fluorine in Soils.  J. Assoc. Off.
     Agric. Chem. 36(2):237-243.

43.  Hargreaves, J. A., G. S. Ingram, and D. L. Cox.  1970.  The Auto-
     matic Determination of Fluoride in Urine.  Analyst (London) 95:
     177-180.

44.  Hendrickson, E. R.  1968.  Air Sampling and Quantity Measurement.
     In:  Air Pollution, 2nd ed., Vol. 2, Analysis, Monitoring, and Sur-
     veying, A. C. Stern, ed.  Academic Press, New York.  pp. 3-51.

45.  Horton, C. A.  1961.  Fluorine.  In:  Treatise on Analytical Chem-
     istry; Part II, Analytical Chemistry of the Elements, Vol. 7, I. M.
     Kolthoff and P. J. Elving, eds.  John Wiley and Sons, Interscience
     Publishers, New York.  pp. 207-334.

46.  Horvath, A. L.  1975.  Physical Properties of Inorganic Compounds.
     Crane, Russak and Co., New York.  pp. 31-130.

47.  Intersociety Committee on Methods for Ambient Air Sampling and
     Analysis.  1969.  Tentative Method for Analysis for Fluoride Con-
     tent of the Atmosphere and Plant Tissues (Manual Methods).  Health
     Lab. Sci. 6(2):64-101.

48.  Israel, G. W.  1974.  Evaluation and Comparison of Three Atmospheric
     Fluoride Monitors Under Field Conditions.  Atmos. Environ. 8:159-166.

49.  Jacobson, J. S., and D. C. McCune.  1969.  Interlaboratory Study of
     Analytical Techniques for Fluorine in Vegetation.  J. Assoc. Off.
     Agric. Chem. 52(5):894-899.

50.  Jacobson, J., and L. Weinstein.  1977.  Sampling and Analysis of
     Fluoride:  Methods for Ambient Air, Plant, and Animal Tissues,
     Water, Soil, and Foods.  J. Occup. Med. 19(1):79-87.

51.  Jeffery, P. G., and J. M. Bakes.  1967.  The Determination of Fluo-
     rine in Fluorite Ores and Concentrates by Isotope-Source  Fast-
     Neutron Activation Analysis.  Analyst  (London) 92:151-155.

52.  Kakabadse, G. J., B. Manohin, J. M. Bather, E. C. Weller, and P.
     Woodbridge.  1971.  Decomposition and  the Determination of Fluorine
     in Biological Materials.  Nature (London) 229:626-627.

53.  Karasek, F. W.  1975.  Detection Limits in Instrumental Analysis.
     Res./Dev. 26(7):20-24.

54.  Katz, M.  1968.  Analysis of Inorganic Gaseous Pollutants.   In:
     Air Pollution, 2nd ed., Vol. 2, Analysis, Monitoring, and Surveying,
     A. C. Stern, ed.  Academic Press, New  York.  pp.  54-104.

-------
                                  54


55.  Katz, M.,  ed.  1977.  Methods of Air Sampling and Analysis.   Ameri-
     can Public Health Association, Washington, B.C.  p. 388.

56.  Latimer, W. M.,  and J. H. Hildebrand.   1951.   Reference Book of
     Inorganic  Chemistry, 3rd ed.   MacMillan Co.,  New York.   625  pp.

57.  Lauff, J.  J., E. R. Champlin, and E. P. Przybylowicz.   1973.
     Determination of Fluorine and Oxygen in the Presence of Fluorine
     by Selective Neutron Activation Using Californium-252 and a  14-
     MeV Generator.  Anal.  Chem.  45(l):52-57.

58.  Leech, H.  R.  1956.  The Occurrence, Preparation, and Manufacture
     of Fluorine.  In:  Supplement to Mellor's Comprehensive Treatise on
     Inorganic  and Theoretical Chemistry, Supplement II, Part I.
     Longmans,  Green and Co., London,  pp.  2-45.

59.  Lester, D., and W. Adams.  1965.  The Inhalation Toxicity of Oxygen
     Difluoride.  Am. Ind.  Hyg. Assoc. J. 26:562-567.

60.  Light, T.  S., and C. C. Cappuccino.  1975.  Determination of Fluo-
     ride in Toothpaste Using an Ion-Selective Electrode.  J.  Chem. Educ.
     52(4):247-250.

61.  Linde, H.  W.  1959.  Estimation of Small Amounts of Fluoride in
     Body Fluids.  Anal. Chem. 31(12):2092-2094.

62.  MacDonald, A.  1970.  Methods of Analysis for Fluorine.  In:  Phar-
     macology of Fluorides, Vol.  20, Part 2, F. Smith, ed.   Springer-
     Verlag, Berlin,   pp. 1-47.

63.  McFarren,  E. F., B. J. Moorman, and J. H. Parker.  1969.   Water
     Fluoride No. 3., Study No. 33.  U.S. Department of Health, Educa-
     tion, and  Welfare, Cincinnati, Ohio.  pp. 23-25.

64.  McGaughey, C., and E.  C. Stowell.  1964.   Estimation of a Few Nano-
     grams of Fluoride in the Presence of Phosphate by the Use of Liver
     Esterase.   Anal. Chem. 36(12):2344-2350.

65.  McKenna, F. E.  1951a.  Methods of Fluorine and Fluoride Analysis —
     I.  Nucleonics 8(6):24-33.

66.  McKenna, F. E.  19512?.  Methods of Fluorine and Fluoride Analysis —
     II.  Nucleonics 9(1):40-49.

67.  MacNulty,  B. J., G. F. Reynolds, and E. A. Terry.  1952.   Polaro-
     graphic Determination of Fluoride.  Nature (London) 169:888-889.

68.  Mandl, R.  H., L. H. Weinstein, G. J. Weiskopf, and J.  L.  Major.
     1971.  The Separation and Collection of Gaseous and Particulate
     Fluorides.  In:  Proceedings of the Second International Clean Air
     Congress,  H. M. Englund and W. T. Beery, eds.  Academic Press, New
     York.  pp. 450-458.

-------
                                  55


69.  Marshall, B. S., and R. Wood.  1968.  A Simple Field Test for the
     Determination of Hydrogen Fluoride in Air.   Analyst (London)  93:
     821-826.

70.  Mattson,  V. L.  1970.  Uranium and Uranium Compounds.   In: Kirk-
     Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology, Vol.  21, 2nd ed.   John
     Wiley and Sons, Interscience Publishers, New York.   pp.  1-36.

71.  Megregian, S.  1954.  Rapid Spectrophotometric Determination  of
     Fluoride with Zirconium-Eriochrome Cyanine R Lake.   Anal. Chem.
     26(7):1161-1166.

72.  Melton, J. R., W. L. Hoover, and J. L. Ayers.  1974.  Known Addi-
     tion Procedure for Determining Fluoride in Feeds  with an Ion-
     Specific Electrode.  J. Assoc. Off. Agric.  Chem.  57(3):508-510.

73.  The Merck Index.  1976.  9th ed.  Merck and Co.,  Rahway, N.J.
     1713 pp.

74.  Metcalf,  R. L.  1966.  Fluorine-Containing Insecticides.  In:
     Handbook of Experimental Pharmacology, Vol. 20, Part 1,  Pharmacol-
     ogy of Fluorides.  Springer-Verlag, New York.  pp.  355-386.

75.  Moeller,  T.  1952.  Inorganic Chemistry.  John Wiley and Sons,
     New York.  966 pp.

76.  National Academy of Sciences.  1971.  Fluorides.   Washington,  D.C.
     295 pp.

77.  Neumark,  H. R., and J. M. Siegmund.  1966.   Fluorine.   In: Kirk-
     Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology, Vol.  9, 2nd. ed.   John
     Wiley and Sons, Interscience Publishers, New York.   pp.  506-526.

78.  Nicholson, C. R.  1966.  Multicell Diffusion Trays for Determining
     Inorganic Fluoride in Physiological Materials. Anal.  Chem. 38(13):
     1966-1967.

79.  Nielsen,  H. M.  1960.  The Determination of Fluoride in Soft  Tissue,
     Bone, and Urine:  Summary of a Report.  A.M.A. Arch. Ind. Health
     21:316-317.

80.  Nikolaev, N. S., S. N. Suvorova, E. I. Gurovich,  I. Peka, and E.  K.
     Korchemnaya.  1972.  Analytical Chemistry of Fluorine, J. Schmorak,
     translator.  John Wiley and Sons, Halsted Press,  New York.  222 pp.

81.  Ohno, S., M. Suzuki, K. Sasajima, and S. Iwata.  1970.  Determina-
     tion of Fluorine in Urine by Photonuclear-Activation Analysis.
     Analyst  (London) 95:260-263.

82.  Pack, M.  R., A. C. Hill, M. D. Thomas, and L. G.  Transtrum.  1959.
     Determination of Gaseous and Particulate Inorganic Fluorides in the
     Atmosphere.  In:  Symposium on Air Pollution Control.  American
     Society for Testing Materials, Philadelphia,  pp. 27-44.

-------
                                  56
83.  Pattison, F.L.M.  1959.  Toxic Aliphatic Fluorine Compounds.
     Elsevier Publishing Co., New York.  227 pp.

84.  Pattison, F.L.M., and R. A. Peters.  1966.  Monofluoro Aliphatic
     Compounds.  In:  Handbook of Experimental Pharmacology, Vol. 20,
     Part 1, Pharmacology of Fluorides.  Springer-Verlag, New York.
     pp. 387-458.

85.  Quan, C. K.  1976.  Fluorspar.  In:  Mineral Yearbook, Vol. 1,
     Metals, Minerals, and Fuels.  U.S. Bureau of Mines, Washington,
     D.C.  pp. 551-575.

86.  Roholm, K.  1938.  Fluoride Intoxication:  A Clinical Hygienic
     Study.  H. K. Lewis and Co., London.

87.  Rudge, A. J.  1962.  The Manufacture and Use of Fluorine and Its
     Compounds.  Oxford University Press, New York.  85 pp.

88.  Sargent, J. W., and R. J. Seffl.  1970.  Properties of Perfluori-
     nated Liquids.  Fed. Proc. Fed. Am. Soc. Exp. Biol. 29(5):1699-1703.

89.  Shoemaker, C. E.  1955.  Polarographic Determination of Traces of
     Fluoride and Iron.  Anal. Chem. 27(4):552-556.

90.  Sholtes, R. S., E. H. Meadows, Jr., and J. B. Koogler.  1973.
     Evaluation and Modification of Fluoride Sampling and Analytical
     Methods.  EPA-650/2-73-007, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
     Washington, D.C.  84 pp.

91.  Simons, J. H., ed.  1964.  General Chemistry of Fluorine-Containing
     Compounds.  In:  Fluorine Chemistry, Vol. 5.  Academic Press, New
     York.  p. 101.

92.  Singer, L., and W. D. Armstrong.  1965.  Determination of Fluoride.
     Anal. Biochem. 10:495-500.

93.  Smith, F.  1970.  Biological Properties of Selected Fluorine-
     Containing Organic Compounds.  In:  Pharmacology of Fluorides, Vol.
     20, Part 2, F. Smith, ed.  Springer-Verlag, New York.  pp. 253-259.

94.  Sollmann, T.  1957.  A Manual of Pharmacology and Its Applications
     to Therapeutics and Toxicology, 8th ed.  W. B. Saunders Co., Phila-
     delphia.  1535 pp.

95.  Staebler, C. J., Jr.  1975.  Treatment and Recovery of Fluoride and
     Nitrate Industrial Wastes.  In:  Proceedings from the Treatment of
     Industrial Wastewaters.  Information Transfer, Inc., February 3-5,
     1975, Washington, D.C.  pp. 99-111.

96.  Streng, A. G.  1963.  The Oxygen Fluorides.  Chem. Rev. 63:607-624.

-------
                                   57
 97.   Taves, D.  1968a.  Determination of Submicromolar Concentrations
      of Fluoride in Biological Samples.  Talanta 15:1015-1023.

 98.   Taves, D.  19682?.  Separation of Fluoride by Rapid Diffusion Using
      Hexamethyldisiloxane.  Talanta 15:969-974.

 99.   Thomas, M. D., and E. W. Alther.  1966.  The Effects of Fluoride
      on Plants.  In:  Handbook of Experimental Pharmacology, Vol. 20,
      Part 1, Pharmacology of Fluorides.  Springer-Verlag, New York.
      pp. 231-306.

100.   Thompson, R. J., T. B. McMullen, and G. B. Morgan.  1971.   Fluoride
      Concentrations in the Ambient Air.  J. Air Pollut. Control Assoc.
      21(8):484-487.

101.   Torma, L.  1975.  Collaborative Study of Ion Selective Electrode
      Method for the Direct Determination of Fluoride in Feeds.   J.
      Assoc. Off. Agric. Chem. 58(3):477-481.

102.   U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.  1972.  Code of Federal Regu-
      lations.  Subchapter E:  Pesticide Programs, Section 162.31, U.S.
      Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.

103.   U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.  1974.  Methods for  Chemical
      Analysis for Water and Wastes.  EPA-625/6-74-003, Cincinnati, Ohio.
      298 pp.

104.   Venkateswarlu, P.  1974.  Reverse Extraction Technique for the
      Determination of Fluoride in Biological Materials.  Anal.  Chem.
      46(7):879-882.

105.   Venkateswarlu, P.  1975.  Fallacies in the Determination of Total
      Fluorine and Nonionic Fluorine in the Diffusates of Unashed Sera
      and Ultrafiltrates.  Biochem. Med. 14:368-377.

106.   Waldblott, G.  1963.  Acute Fluoride Intoxication.  Acta Med.
      Scand. Suppl. 174 400:5-33.

107.   Warner, T. B.  1971.  Electrode Determination of Fluoride  in Ill-
      Characterized Natural Waters.  Water Res. 5(7):459-465.

108.   Warner, T. B.  1973.  Fluoride Analysis in Seawater and in Other
      Complex Natural Waters Using an Ion-Selective Electrode — Techniques,
      Potentialities, Limitations.  In:  Chemical Analysis of the Environ-
      ment and Other Modern Techniques, S. Ahuja, E. M. Cohen, T. J. Kneip,
      J. L. Lambert, and G. Zweig, eds.  Chemical Analysis of the Environ-
      ment and Other Modern Techniques, Series, Vol. 5.  Plenum Press,
      New York.  pp. 229-240.

109.   Warner, T. B., and D. J. Bressan.  1973.  Direct Measurement of
      Less than 1 Part-Per-Billion Fluoride in Rain, Fog, and Aerosols
      with an Ion-Selective Electrode.  Anal. Chim. Acta 63:165-173.

-------
                                   58
110.  Weast, R. C., ed.  1978.  Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 59th
      ed.  Chemical Rubber Co., Cleveland, Ohio.

111.  Weddle, D. A., and R. L. Maurer.  1954.  Method for Preparation of
      Fluorine-Low Calcium Oxide.  Anal. Chem. 26(3):584-585.

112.  Willard, H. H., and 0. B. Winter.  1933.  Volumetric Method for
      Determination of Fluorine.  Ind. Eng. Chem. Anal. Ed. 5(1):7-10.

113.  Wood, H.  1975.  Fluorine.  In:  Mineral Facts and Problems.  U.S.
      Bureau of Mines, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.
      pp. 379-399.

-------
                                SECTION 3

                  BIOLOGICAL ASPECTS IN MICROORGANISMS
3.1  SUMMARY

     Some microorganisms are capable of interacting with fluoride-
containing pollutants in the environment, altering the form, concen-
tration, and potential hazard of the compounds.   The types of fluoride
compounds to which microorganisms are exposed are those used in water
fluorination, dentifrices, aerosols, pesticides, and compounds associated
with industrial air pollution.  Fluoride and fluoroorganic compounds are
also used as a biochemical tool for investigating microbial metabolism.
A few strains of bacteria utilize fluoride compounds as catabolites.  Sev-
eral fluorocarbohydrate intermediates have been isolated.  Up to 900 ppm
fluoride (47.4 micromoles per gram wet weight) has been reported in lichens
and as much as 180 ppm (8.9 micromoles per gram) in oral bacteria.  In
some cases, fluoride accumulation can be reversed by a recuperation per-
iod or by washing the cells.

     Toxic and metabolic effects from fluoride exposure are reported
for bacteria, yeast, fungi, algae, protozoa, and viruses.  Toxic effects
include developmental and morphological alterations, growth inhibition,
and reduction in infectivity.  Dormant bacterial spores are more resist-
ant than vegetative cells to fluoride aerosols;  higher molecular weight
compounds and compounds containing more chlorine than fluoride seem to
be the most toxic to some microorganisms (e.g.,  StaphyloooccuB aweus).
Fluoride acts as a metabolic inhibitor altering such processes as respir-
ation, photosynthesis, carbohydrate metabolism (e.g., sugar uptake, ion
transport, acid production, and glycolysis), and enzyme activity.  A sub-
strate analog of phenylalanine, p-fluorophenylalanine, and an analog of
uracil, 5-fluorouracil, can be incorporated into protein and nucleic acids.
Some effects of these compounds are:  reduction of synthesis of protein,
RNA, and DNA; interference with cell differentiation, chromosomal altera-
tions, and changes in ribosomal composition and properties; and modifica-
tion of messenger RNA functions.

3.2  METABOLISM

     Uptake, accumulation, and biotransformation of fluoride and fluoro-
organic compounds by microorganisms are the subjects of this section.
Studies of microbial metabolism of fluoride compounds have involved sev-
eral types of organisms under diverse sets of objectives.  Strains of
bacteria capable of metabolizing fluoride compounds are important because
of their possible degradation of fluoride-containing pollutants in streams
and soils.  Accumulation of fluoride in microorganisms is discussed in
terms of uptake in laboratory cultures and in natural environments, in-
cluding those in human saliva and dental plaque.
                                   59

-------
                                   60
3.2.1  Uptake and Accumulation

     Several strains of bacteria that can metabolize fluorocarbons have
been isolated.  From creek water, Kelly  (1965) isolated  a gram-negative
rod (National Collection of Industrial Bacteria No. 9562) capable of
growing very slowly with fluoroacetate (40 mW) or  fluoroacetamide (40 mW)
as the sole carbon and fuel source.   (Fluoroacetamide also served as a
nitrogen source.)  The growth was linear rather than exponential, sug-
gesting inhibition due to the accumulation of toxic fluoride by-products.
Goldman (1965) isolated a pseudomonad from Potomac River mud which used
fluoroacetate (50 mW) as its sole carbon source, and Goldman, Milne, and
Pignataro (1967) isolated Pseudomonas species that utilized 2-fluorobenzoic
acid as its sole carbon source.  A Pseudomanas species isolated by Harper
and Blakley (1971) used p-fluorophenylacetic acid  as its sole carbon and
fuel source (Figure 3.1).  However, a Vibrio 01 strain exhibited no growth
in 48 hr in a medium containing p-fluorobenzoate even when inoculated with
cells adapted to benzoate (Ali, Callely, and Hayes, 1962).  Bowman et al.
(1964) and Bowman and Mallette (1966) found that Esoheviohia ooli could
degrade p-fluorophenylamine by a process that involves an initial deami-
nation; products included a number of fluoride-containing compounds in
addition to fluorophenylacetate.

     Examples of microbial incorporation of fluoride compounds into pro-
tein and nucleic acids are numerous.  Effects of such incorporated flu-
oride are given in Section 3.3.2.3.  Fluoride can  be incorporated into
fc  180

o»
£

Z
O  120
                 t-
                 Z
                 UJ
                 o
                 Z  60
                 O
                 O
                 UJ
                 O
                 0:
                 i   o
                                     ORNL-DWG 76-16552R

                                                 0.9

                                                     e
                  FLUORIDE IN
                    MEDIUM
                       I
            I
I
I
                                                 0.6
                                0.3
                                                    <0
                                    OT
                                    UJ
                                    O
                 CL
                 O
                 "-     O    20    40    60    80
                         INCUBATION TIME (hr)

     Figure 3.1.  Growth of PeettdomonoB sp. on 0.1% p-fluorophenylacetic
acid.  Source:  Adapted from Harper and Blakley, 1971, Figure 1, p. 636.
Reproduced by permission of the National Research Council of Canada from
the Canadian Journal of Microbiology, Volume 17.

-------
                                     61
microbial protein via metabolism of fluoridated amino  acids (Browne,
Kenyon,  and Hegeman, 1970; Dunn and Leach, 1967; Pine,  1978;  Rennert and
Anker,  1963).  For example,  a leucine-requiring mutant  of  E.  coli, (strain
B 615 F) substituted 5',5',5'-trifluoroleucine for  leucine in proteins
(Rennert and Anker, 1963).   Similarly, a cell-free  E.  coli (strain Crookes)
system  incorporated p-fluorophenylalanine into protein (Dunn and Leach,
1967) ,  and an E. coli, mutant strain lacking tryptophanase  and tryptophan
synthetase incorporated DL-tryptophan substituted with fluorine in either
the  4,  5, or 6 position (Browne, Kenyon, and Hegeman,  1970).

      5-Fluorouracil (FU) has been used extensively  in  the  study of nucleic
acid metabolism.  Mandel  (1969) reviewed the incorporation of FU into RNA
and  its molecular consequences.  Table 3.1 shows the percent replacement
             TABLE  3.1.  INCORPORATION OF  5-FLUOROURACIL INTO RNA OF
                           VARIOUS MICROBIAL SPECIES
           Species
 Uracil
replaced
                       Comment
                                   Bacteria
Escherichia coli  B                70
Escherichia coli, uracil          25
  auxotroph

Bacillus subtilis                40-60
Bacillus cereus                   15

Staphylococcus aureus             5
Leuconostoc cerevisiae            a
         Partially reversed by uracil
         Essentially unchanged by addition of
           uracil; 5-fluorouracil partially
           replaced uracil requirement

         Reversed by uracil; enhanced by
           deoxythymidine
         Tested only in presence of uracil
         Reversed by uracil
                                     Fungi
Saccharomyces aarlsbergensis      70
Candida utilis                   10
Trichoderma viride
          Reversed by uracil
          Reversed by uracil; incorporation of
           5-fluorouracil, equal to  that of
           uracil
                                     Virus
Tobacco mosaic virus
Polio virus
Phage MS2
Phage R 17
Phage f2
56
36
80
28
c
            Reversed by uridine
            Reversed by uridine

            Reversed by uracil
     ?6.9 wg 5-fluorouracil per milligram dry weight.
      Tritiated 5-fluorouracil incorporated into  RNA.
     ClilC-labeled 5-fluorouracil incorporated into  phage RNA.
     Source:  Adapted from Mandel, 1969, Table 1,  p.
of the publisher.
                   85.  Reprinted by permission

-------
                                     62


of uracil by  FU in several bacteria,  fungi, and viruses.   Kaiser (1969)
reported that E.  coli B grown  in  the  presence of FU-RNA  contained a mix-
ture of normal and FU-containing  transfer ribonucleic  acids  (FU-tRNA).   Up
to 65% to 70% replacement of uracil residues by FU was detected in the
£RNA.  Similarly, Viriyanondha and Baxter (1970) grew  Staphylococcus aureus
ATCC 6538P  in a complex medium with 300 vg per milliliter  of fluoroacetate.
Approximately 50% of the acetate  in #-acylamino sugar-containing uridine
nucleotides,  excreted in response to  penicillin, was substituted with
fluoride.

     Jenkins, Edgar, and Ferguson (1969) reported that plaque bacteria
grown on fluoride-rich media contained high levels  (up to  134 ppm) of flu-
oride (Table  3.2).  (Data are  for a Streptococcus strain;  similar results
were obtained for another Streptococcus and an organism  tentatively iden-
tified as a Staphylococcus.)   Dental  plaque, which  is mainly amassed
bacteria, may contain as much  as  180  ppm fluoride (Hardwick  and Leach,
1963).
           TABLE 3.2.  FLUORIDE CONCENTRATION IN A STREPTOCOCCUS ISOLATED
            FROM HUMAN PLAQUE AND GROWN ON MEDIA CONTAINING A RANGE OF
               FLUORIDE WITH FINAL pH REACHED AFTER INCUBATION WITH
                              SUCROSE FOR 18 hra
Fluoride
added to
media
(ppm)
0
2
5
10
Fluoride in
suspension
(jig/ml)
0.8
2.0
4.5
5.0
Nitrogen in
suspension
(mg/ml)
0.46
0.51
0.58
0.59
Estimated
fluoride
in washed
bacteria
(ppm)
27
62
124
134
pH after
incubation
4.72
5.00
5.16
5.43
              aThese figures on fluoride concentration were obtained before
          the advent of the fluoride electrode and are now thought  to be too
          high; however, later work has  confirmed that bacteria take up
          fluoride and are inhibited as  a result.
              Source:  Adapted from Jenkins, Edgar,  and Ferguson,  1969,
          Table 4, p. 112.  Reprinted by permission of the publisher.
      High levels of fluoride  can also be accumulated by  certain species
 of lichens.   Lichen thalli  accumulated fluoride from exposure to ambient
 fluoride at a level of 4 yg of fluoride per cubic meter  of air (Nash,
 1971).   This ability to accumulate fluoride was thought  to be a function
 of relative humidity as indicated by the data in Table 3.3.  These data
 show that an increase in fluoride levels in two species,  Cladonia cpistat-
 ella and Parmelia caperata, occurred with an increase in relative humidity.
 Concentrations of fluoride  in Cladonia and Paxmelia species,  transplanted
 near a chemical factory known to be a source of ambient  fluoride, ranged

-------
                                       63
                 TABLE 3.3.  ACCUMULATION OF FLUORIDE BY LICHENS
                EXPOSED TO FOUR DAYS OF UNIFORM AMBIENT FLUORIDE
                  LEVELS  (5 gg OF FLUORIDE PER CUBIC METER)  BUT
                     UNDER VARYING RELATIVE HUMIDITY REGIMES
                                (ppm dry weight)


                                              Accumulation at
                                           relative humidity of
                      Species
                                          40%
             63%
      87%
Ctadonia cristatella
Parmelia cccperata
10
11
32
26
82
89
                     Source:  Adapted from Nash, 1971, Table 3,
                p.  105.  Reprinted by permission of the publisher.
from 100 to 200  yg of fluoride per gram dry weight  (100 to 200 ppm), com-
pared with 8  to  28 ppm fluoride in controls (Table  3.4).  Laboratory re-
sults also revealed that  lichens accumulated fluoride:  lichens exposed  to
4 ug of fluoride per cubic meter of  air accumulated 84 to 115  ppm fluoride
after a nine-day exposure period, as compared with  14 to 25 ppm fluoride
accumulated in lichens in control chambers.  Fluoride concentrations noted
in  several other lichens  are given in Table 3.5.
            TABLE 3.4.  FLUORIDE CONCENTRATIONS OF TRANSPLANTED LICHENS*1
                                (ppm dry weight)
             Exposure  time
Species
 Concentration
  at distance
from factory of
                                                        100 m
                        6000 m
One-month exposure
June
July
August
September
October
Three-month exposure
(July to September)

Cladonia criatatella


Cladonia polyaarpoides
Cladonia orietatella
Parmelia plittii
,
138?
164?
180*
220*
100*
>220*
>220J
174°

23
28
24
20
8
18
21
22
              °T)ata are means of  two subsamples.  Values that exceeded  the
          calibration scale are indicated by >.
              ^Significantly different from the control at the 1% level.
              Source: Adapted from Nash,  1971, Table 1, p.  105.  Reprinted
          by permission of the publisher.

-------
                                    64
                  TABLE 3.5.  FLUORIDE CONCENTRATIONS IN LICHENS
Species
Dermatocarpon rtiniatwn

Peltigera rufesaens

Parmelia saxatilis




Uanea aubfloridana




Ramalina fmxinea
Usnea subfloridana
Parmelia sulcata










Sample description
Saxicolous, collected near aluminum
smelter
Terricolous, collected near aluminum
smelter
Saxicolous, collected downwind of
aluminum smelter



Lignicolous , collected downwind of
aluminum smelter



Trees, Invergordon, Scotland, 1969°
Trees, Invergordon, Scotland, 1969
Corticolous, field transplant, E and
NE of smelter, four months




Corticolous , field transplant , E and
NE of smelter, 12 months



Distance
from smelter
(km)




1.6
2.1
3
7
11
1.6
2.1
3
7
12


1
2
4
8
15
40
1
2
4
8
15
Fluoride
content
(ppm)
199

184

47
18
17
19
14
20
7
2
2
<1
0
0
990
750
570
475
190
70
900
700
516
500
134
     Aluminum smelter began operation in spring 1971.

    Source: Adapted from Gilbert, 1973, Table 2, p. 179.
sources.  Reprinted by permission of the publisher.
Data collected from several
     Although fluoride can be accumulated by  some microorganisms, experi-
mental  evidence shows that in some instances  the fluoride-cell bond is weak
and  that  fluoride accumulation can be reversed.   Comeau and LeBlanc (1972)
found that  three weeks after fumigating Hypogymnia physodes with 65 ppb
fluoride  for 2 hr, 36% and 47% of the accumulated fluoride was lost.  No
mechanism for the loss was postulated.  Birkeland and Rolla (1972) found
that StreptocoactiB strains OMZ 52-3, GS 5,  and ATCC 10558 had negligible
or no affinity for fluoride, either when standing in phosphate buffer (10
\iM sodium fluoride) or grown in 5% sucrose  broth containing 10 ]iM fluo-
ride.   This lack of bacterial affinity suggests  that if fluoride is bound
within  oral bacteria, it is probably associated with a low-molecular--weight
compound.   Accumulation of fluoride in a beer culture after successive
fermentations was studied by Klopper and Jongeling-Eijndhoven (1971).
Concentrations up to 29.89 ppm fluoride occurred in SaccharomyeeB caple-
bergensis cells after six successive fermentations when 10 ppm fluoride
was  added to the wort (Table 3.6).  However,  washing the cells removed

-------
                                   65
          TABLE 3.6.  FLUORIDE CONCENTRATIONS IN WASHED AND UNWASHED
                 YEAST AFTER SUCCESSIVE FERMENTATION SERIES
Yeast
preparation

Unwashed





Washed





Series
number

1
2
3
4
5
6
I
2
3
4
5
6
Fluoride content (ppm dry weight)
for added fluoride concentration of

0

0.15
0.11
0.22
2.14
0.76

0.06
0.02
0.00
0.04
0.10

1

1.41
2.23
3.01
2.92
3.89

0.05
0.08
0.42
0.05
0.06

2

1.51
3.72
4.82
5.59
7.26

0.08
0.14
0.43
0.11
0.37

5

7.40
7.83
8.41
10.47
20.53

0.35
0.19
0.66
0.13


10

12.18
24.67
19.79
16.14
29.89

0.12
0.19
0.43
0.12
0.19
             Source:  Adapted from Klopper and Jongeling-Eijndhoven,
         1971, Tables II and III, p. 260.  Reprinted by permission of
         the publisher.
most of the fluoride, suggesting  that  the fluoride was loosely bound to
the cells.  Kashket and Rodriguez (1976)  found that Streptococcus sanguia
could concentrate fluoride  from dilute solutions and that part of the
accumulated fluoride could  be  readily  removed by simple washing of the
cells; however, part of it  was tightly bound.   Because uptake was not
inhibited by iodoacetamide  or  lack of  glucose, they concluded that it
was a passive process.

     It is becoming clear that a  large part  of fluoride uptake by micro-
organisms can be related to the weak-acid character of hydrogen fluoride.
For example, Whitford et al.  (1977)  concluded from their study of fluoride
uptake by Streptococcus mutans strain  6715 that "fluoride uptake occurs
by the diffusion of hydrogen fluoride  and subsequent trapping of ionic
fluoride."  It is well known that bacteria maintain a difference in pH
across the cell membrane during growth and metabolism.  This difference
results from:  (1) the action  of  a membrane  ATPase, which moves protons
out of the cell; and (2) the proton barrier  function of the membrane.
Therefore, when a compound  such as sodium fluoride is added to a bacterial
cell suspension, it will dissociate, and  depending on the pH, some of the
fluoride will be in the form of hydrogen  fluoride, which passes readily
across the membrane.  Since the cell interior is alkaline, the hydrogen
fluoride will dissociate.   The F~ ion  cannot pass back across the membrane,
therefore it is trapped within the cell.   This mechanism for fluoride up-
take is probably the major  basis  for the  common finding that fluoride is
more potent at lower pH values.  Eisenberg et al. (1978) found that fluo-
ride can act as a transmembrane-proton conductor to discharge the pH dif-
ference across the cell membranes of streptococci, thereby rendering them
more acid sensitive.

-------
                                    66
3.2.2  Biotransformation
     Many  oxidation products of fluorocarbohydrates have been identified
from studies of bacterial carbohydrate metabolism.   Several examples of
fluorocarbohydrate biotransformation by Pseudomonas bacteria are cited.

     1.  The following fluorinated intermediates were detected in the
medium of  a Pseudomonas species using p-fluorophenylacetic acid as its
sole carbon source:  (a) D(+)-monofluorosuccinic acid, (b) tvans-3-f.luoro-
3-hexenedioic acid, (c) (-)-4-carboxymethyl-4-fluorobutanolide, (d) 4-
fluoro-2-hydroxyphenylacetic acid, and  (e)  4-fluoro-3-hydroxyphenylacetic
acid  (Harper and Blakley, 1971).  The structures of these compounds are
shown  in Figure 3.2.
                                         ORNL-DWG  76-I6553R
                   COOH


                 HaCHb

                  HCF

                   COOH

                   A
 COOH


 CHz


 CH
 II
FC
 CH2
                                    COOH

                                     B
    COOH
    CH2

    I
CH2
I      >
V
                 0

                 C
                            CHeCOOH
         CH2COOH
                 A - D(+)-monofluorosuccinic acid
                 B — trans-3-f luoro-3-hexenedioic acid
                 C — (—)-4-carboxymethyl-4-fluorobutanolide
                 D — 4-fluoro-3-hydroxyphenylacetic acid
                 E — 4-fluoro-2-hydroxyphenylacetic acid

     Figure 3.2.  Structures of metabolites isolated from medium after
incubation of Pseudomonas sp. with p-fluorophenylacetic acid.   Source:
Adapted from Harper  and Blakley, 1971, Figure 3, p. 638.  Reproduced by
permission of the National Research Council of Canada from  the  Canadian
Journal of Microbiology, Volume 17.

-------
                                    67
     2.  White and Taylor (1970) reported that resting whole-cell suspen-
sions of Pseudomonas fluoveseene would metabolize 3-deoxy-3-fluoro-D-
glucose (3FG) to 3-deoxy-3-fluoro-D-gluconic acid (3FGA).  A further
oxidation product was obtained and tentatively assigned  the structure of
3-deoxy-3-fluoro-2-keto-D-gluconic acid (3F2KGA).  Taylor, White, and
Eisenthal (1972) found that P. fiuoveecens cell-free extracts immediately
oxidized 3FG to 3F2KGA.  Using partially purified enzyme preparations of
P. fluorescens cell-free extracts, Taylor, Hill, and Eisenthal (1975)
found that 3FG and 3FGA were substrates for glucose oxidase and gluconate
dehydrogenase.  Thus it seems that the same enzymes that oxidize glucose
and gluconic acid also oxidize 3FG and 3FGA.

     3.  3-Fluorocatechol, 2-fluoromuconic acid, and fluoride ion were
identified in the growth medium of a Pseudomonas species which was sup-
plied with 2-fluorobenzoic acid as its sole carbon source  (Goldman, Milne,
and Fignataro, 1967).  The presence of the first two oxidation products
suggests the following metabolic pathway:
                                           COOH
     4.  A Pseudomonas species isolated from mud was found to selectively
degrade the enantiomer of fluorocitrate that inhibits the tricarboxylic
acid-cycle enzyme aconitase (Kirk and Goldman, 1970).  Figure 3.3 shows the
course of fluoride release due to the bacterial degradation of fluorocit-
rate.  The concentrations of fluoride (2.1 mM and 2.4 wM in two different
experiments) represent approximately half the amount of racemic evythro-
fluorocitric acid that was added to the medium, suggesting the selective
degradation of one isomer.
                                       ORNL-DWG 76-16554
                               40    60
                                 TIME (hr)

     Figure 3.3.  Release of F~ ion by a Pseudomonas sp. from racemic
eryt/iro-fluorocitric acid in two experiments.  Source:  Adapted from
Kirk and Goldman, 1970, Figure 1, p. 410.  Reprinted by permission of the
publisher.

-------
                                   68


     5.   Washed cells of the actinomycete Noaardia erytkpopolie can oxidize
2-fluoro-4-nitrobenzoate to fluoroacetate, which is enzymatically converted
to fluorocitrate (Cain, Tranter, and Darrah, 1968).

     Although present data make it impossible to assess the relative tox-
icities of these fluorinated carbohydrates and ionic fluorides, organisms
such as the Pseudomonas species discussed in example 4, which can degrade
an inhibitor of aconitase, may play a role in detoxifying fluorine pollut-
ants in the environment.  For additional information on microbial biotrans-
formation of fluorocarbohydrates see Taylor (1972) and Goldman (1972).

3.3  EFFECTS

     Toxic and metabolic effects of fluoride compounds have been observed
in bacteria, yeast, fungi, protozoa, algae, and viruses.  Toxic effects
reported include developmental and morphological alterations, growth in-
hibition, and reduction in infectivity.  Metabolic effects include inhibi-
tion of energy-transferring mechanisms such as respiration, photosynthesis,
and carbohydrate catabolism; inhibition of substrate uptake and transport;
inhibition of many enzymes; and interference with protein synthesis and
nucleic acid metabolism.  Most of the data presented are from studies on
lichen sensitivity to pollutants, the cariostatic activity of fluoride,
the effects of aerosols, and the use of fluoride as an enzymatic and
metabolic probe.

3.3.1  Toxic Effects

     Since many lichens are sensitive to airborne fluorides, they are
frequently used as indicators of fluoride air pollution (Gilbert, 1973;
Hawksworth, 1971).  Injury to lichen flora in the vicinity of aluminum
smelters and chemical factories has been reported by several authors
(LeBlanc, Comeau, and Rao, 1971; LeBlanc and De Sloover, 1970; LeBlanc,
Rao, and Comeau, 1972; Pistit and Lisicka-JelfnkovS, 1974).  Severity of
injury depends on distance from the fluoride source, topography, and wind
direction.  Toxic symptoms resulting from fluoride pollution include:
chlorosis; necrosis; curled margins; white, pink, or gray colors; disin-
tegration of the thallus; microscopically observed plasmolysis; and loss
of color in the algae cells (Comeau and LeBlanc, 1972; Gilbert, 1973;
Nash, 1971).  In a laboratory fumigation experiment, Comeau and LeBlanc
(1972) exposed Hypogymnia phyeodee to concentrations of hydrogen fluoride
ranging from 13 to 130 ppb.  Fumigation with 13 ppb for 8 hr caused no
observable symptoms.  However, 36-, 72-, and 108-hr exposures caused
chlorosis and curling of the margins; so did a 12-hr exposure to 65 ppb.
The authors noted that fluoride was accumulated even when no symptoms
could be observed.  Nash (1971) reported that lichens fumigated with fluo-
ride invariably became chlorotic upon fluoride accumulation, and that a
critical level of F~ in the thallus was 30 to 80 ppm.  He concluded that
the algal component of the lichen was more sensitive to hydrogen fluoride
than the fungal component, since the morphological form of the lichen was
maintained for several weeks after the appearance of total chlorosis.

-------
                                   69

     Some toxic effects of fluorine compounds on protozoa have been
observed; however, exact mechanisms of action are not known.  The amino
acid analog DL-p-fluorophenylalanine  (p-FPhe) inhibits division in cells
selected from exponentially growing populations of Tetrdhymena pyriformis
(Rasmussen and Zeuthen, 1962) and Paramea-iiffn aurelia (Rasmussen, 1967).
In P. aurelia., 16 vcM p-FPhe inhibited cell division when applied up to
4.5 hr after the previous cell division.  After that time (the sensitivity
transition point), p-FPhe did not block cell division.  For both organisms,
this transition point occurred about 1 hr before completion of the cell
cycle (i.e., cytokinesis) and roughly coincided with the termination of
macronuclear DNA synthesis.  In a study of various chemicals associated
with operation and maintenance of nuclear power plants and cooling tower
structures, Becker and Thatcher (1973) reported that although fluoride
ions apparently have direct toxic properties toward aquatic life, concen-
trations of 1.5 ppm fluoride did not appear to be harmful to aquatic orga-
nisms under most conditions.  The toxic threshold of Mierovegma heterostoma
occurred after a 28-hr incubation period at 27°C with 226 ppm fluoride
(Bringmann and Kuhn, 1959, as cited in Becker and Thatcher, 1973).

     Bean plants (Phaseolus vulgaon-s L.) showed increased numbers of
lesions with increasing foliar fluoride concentrations (up to 500 ppm)
after inoculation with tobacco mosaic virus (TMV) (Treshow, Dean, and
Harner, 1967).  Above 500 ppm fluoride the number of lesions decreased.
Although fluoride did increase the virulence of TMV in this controlled
situation, the authors suggested that, due to many environmental factors
(e.g., light, temperature, and moisture) this increased virulence may go
undetected in the field.

     Effects of p-fluorophenylalanine on nitrous acid mutagenesis in bac-
teriophage T* r mutants were studied by Johnson (1975Z>).  The frequency
of nitrous acid-induced forward r mutations was approximately doubled
when the phage-infected E. aoli B cells were held in the presence of p-
FPhe.  However, spontaneous forward mutation frequency and the nitrous
acid specificity were not affected by p-FPhe.  The frequencies of sponta-
neous and nitrous acid-induced reversion of rll transition mutants were
unaffected by p-FPhe when the phage was plated on the restrictive host
after mutagenesis.  However, compared with the control phage, the induced
reversion frequency was approximately tripled when the mutagenized phage
first underwent a cycle of replication in the presence of p-FPhe.  In
contrast, Johnston (1975a) reported that p-FPhe depressed 5-bromouracil—
induced frequencies in both forward and reverse mutation.  Davies and
Parry (1978) found that p-fluorophenylalanine at growth-inhibitory con-
centrations increased the frequency of mitotic gene conversion in haploid
yeast cultures and enhanced the mutagenicity of nitrous oxide, mitomycin
C, ethylmethane-sulphonate, and uv light.  They suggested that p-fluoro-
phenylalanine became incorporated into the enzymes involved in DNA repli-
cation with the net result of lower fidelity of replication and increased
errors in base incorporation.

     Haploidization in yeast can be induced by p-FPhe.  Gutz  (1966) re-
ported that p-FPhe treatment resulted in haploidization of diploid Sehizo-
sacoharomyces parribe strains when plated on yeast extract — glucose agar

-------
                                   70
gradient plates (0.06% to 0.1% p-FPhe).  DL-p-Fluorophenylalanine also
induced haploidization in Aspergillus rriger diploids  (Lhoas, 1961).  Con-
idia were plated onto standard complete medium containing 0.01% p-FPhe.
The viable counts were the same as controls; however, the growth was
slower (reduced colony diameters), and sporulation was poor.

     Fluoride can interfere with fungal sporulation, germination, and
growth.  Lukens and Horsfall (1973), studying effects of several respira-
tory inhibitors on the sporulation process of Alternaria solani, found that
5.96 wM sodium fluoride reduced stalk formation by 50%.  The effective
concentration for 50% inhibition of conidial formation (EDSO) was greater
than 20 voM and for stalk collapse, greater than 100 mW.  Inhibition of
spore germination in the dermatophyte Microsporum gypsewn resulted from
the addition of 0.1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride to the germination
medium (Leighton and Stock, 1970).  No effect on growth occurred if phenyl-
methylsulfonyl fluoride was added after the emergence of the germ tube.
The compound was found to specifically inhibit the release of free amino
nitrogen by the macroconidia.  Sodium fluoride at a concentration of 50
mM and administered to spores which had been cultured for 4 hr at 30°C,
affected conidia production of Neidfospora orassa strain 853 A (Figure 3.4)
(Timberlake and Turian, 1975).  The effects were time-dependent.  Conidia-
tion increased with length of treatment up to 2 hr, stabilized from 2 hr
                                      ORNL-DWG 76-16555
                     75
                   ro
                   CM
                 o: *"
                 uj T
                 °- t
                   $
                       01234
                             NaF TREATMENT (hr)

     Figure 3.4.  The effect of the duration of 50 wM NaF treatment on
production of conidia; initial treatment was to 4-hr-old Neurospora orassa
cultures.  Source:  Adapted from Timberlake and Turian, 1975, Figure 1,
p. 152.  Reprinted by permission of the publisher.

-------
                                        71
to  3 hr,  and then decreased  after 3  hr.   The  growth of the  treated cultures
was as rapid as  that of the  untreated,  until  the 3-hr treatment period.
The inhibition could be reversed by  washing or by  the addition of  magnesium
chloride.   Treshow (1965) found varying effects on fungal growth and spor-
ulation from concentrations  of 0.1 to  50 mM sodium fluoride.   Verticillium
albo-atrum growth was  completely inhibited by 50 mW fluoride, and  Colleto-
trichum lindemuthianum was the only  fungus that grew at all in this con-
centration.   Table 3.7 shows other reported effects  (Treshow, 1965).
Leslie and Parbery (1972) found that VertiailHwn  leaanii grew readily
on  211 roAf fluoride, a  tolerable concentration four times that reported by
Treshow (1965) for V.  albo-atrum.   No  differences  in the morphology of V.
leoani-iy  resulting from growth on fluoride-containing medium, were noted
by  Leslie and Parbery.   However, spore  length increased with  increasing
fluoride  concentrations.   Fluoroamino  acids such as  DL-p-fluorophenyl-
alanine (p-FPhe)  can also inhibit bacterial sporulation (Hardwick  and
Foster, 1952), even at concentrations  that have little effect on growth
(Marquis,  1970).
        TABLE 3.7.  EFFECTS OF SODIUM FLUORIDE ON GROWTH AND SPORULATION OF PATHOGENIC FUNGI
         Species
    NaF
concentration
              Effect on growth rate
                                     Effect on sporulation
Alternaria oleraceae
Botrytis ainerea
Colletotnahum Hndemuthianum


Cytoepora rubescena




Helnrinthoeporium sativum

Pythium debaryanum





VePticillium albo-atrwn
25, 50
2.5
0.1, 0.5, 1
5
10

1
50

1

5

>10
<25

0.5

10

25

25

1
             Significantly suppressed
               at 21'C
             Complete Inhibition
             Significantly suppressed
             Significant stimulation
             Stimulated at 24°C
             Suppressed at 21°C and
               24 "C

             Significantly suppressed
               at 24°C
             Significantly suppressed
               at 21eC
             Complete inhibition

             No effect
             Significantly inhibited
               at 27"C
             Significantly inhibited
               at 24°C
             Significantly Inhibited
               at 21"C

             Significantly inhibited
               at 27"C
             Stimulated at 18°C or
               27°C; not stimulated
               at 21°C or 24"C
                                                             No effect at <1 mW
                                  Reduced sporulation; only
                                    a few conidiospores
                                    matured
                                  Fewer conidiospores
                                    matured than at 5 mW

                                  No effect
                                  No effect
                                  No effect until complete
                                    growth inhibition
    Source:  Adapted from Treshow,  1965, Figure 1, p. 217.  Reprinted with permission from Mycologia
57:216-221, 1965.

-------
                                    72


     With the increased use of aerosol propellants, the amount of fluoro-
carbons in the atmosphere has increased (Section 7.3.4).  It is impor-
tant to know the effects of these propellants on microorganisms and also
to know if these compounds might be useful as disinfectants for use in
foods or for human infections.  Effects of some of these fluorocarbons
on microorganisms are listed in Table 3.8.  Bacterial spores seem to be
more resistant than vegetative cells.  Some treatments have resulted in
increased survival rates or only slight toxicity.  Oujesky and Bhagat
(1973) examined the effects of several Freons and Genetrons on both
coagulase-positive and coagulase-negative strains of S. aureus.  The most
effective gas tested was dichlorofluoromethane (Genetron-21, Freon-21),
which inhibited both coagulase-positive and coagulase-negative strains
(Table 3.9).  The coagulase-negative strains (Guinn and ATCC 6020) were
more sensitive than the coagulase-positive (Giorgio) strain.  There was
no apparent effect on deoxyribonuclease and gelatinase production by the
three strains.  The higher molecular-weight ethane and methane compounds
and those containing more chloride than fluoride appeared to be the most
toxic.  Thus, the toxicity of chloride-containing fluorocarbon propellants
may be enhanced by chloride substitution for fluoride (Section 7.3.4).
From their results, Prior et al. (1975) suggested that the death of E.
aoli, cells, caused by dichlorodifluoromethane, involved increased permea-
bility, leakage of cell constituents, and lysis.  The fluorocarbon liquids
used in experiments on liquid breathing and for formulations of artificial
blood do not appear to be toxic to microorganisms and have been used to
supply oxygen to pressurized cultures (Marquis, 1976).

     The physiological effects on E. aoli of incorporated amino acid anal-
ogues were described by Pine  (1978).  He determined a toxicity series with
canavanine > azetidine-2-carboxylate > p-fluorophenylalanine > ethionine >
norleucine or o-fluorophenylalanine > /n-fluorophenylalanine or 2,5-dihydro-
phenylalanine > selenomethionine.  Kay and Cameron (1978a, 19782?) used the
fluoridated acids fluorocitrate and fluoromalate to isolate transport-
negative mutants of 5. typhirmari-um for citrate and dicarboxylic acids
respectively.

     Gallon, Ul-Haque, and Chaplin  (1978) found that among the pleiotrophic
effects of fluorocitrate on the blue-green bacterium Gloeoaapsa sp. was an
inhibition of nitrogen fixation, especially under aerobic conditions.  Ammo-
nium ion accumulated within the organism apparently because of the reduced
synthesis of ketoglutarate needed for its assimilation.  The lipid content
of the organism was also altered.

     A new fluoroacid, flumequine, has the following structure:
 Greenwood  (1978)  found that flumequine was active against E. coli and
 could  possibly be used in place of nalidixic acid for treatment of urinary
 tract  infections.

-------
                                 TABLE 3.8.   EFFECTS OF FLUOROCARBON AEROSOL PROPELLANTS  ON MICROORGANISMS
      Coapound
        Treatment
                                        Species
                                                                         Effect
                                                                        Reference
Fluorocarbon-12  and
  fluorocarbon-114*
  (mixture)
Fluorocarbon-12,
  fluorocarbon-142b
40/60 propellent blend
  (12/114)
Vapor and liquid states

Vapor state

Vapor state

Vapor and liquid states

Vapor state

Vapor and liquid states

Vapor and liquid states

Vapor state

Vapor and liquid states

Vapor state

Vapor and liquid states

Vapor and liquid states

Vapor and liquid states

Vapor state

Vapor state

Vapor state
Pseudomonas aeruginoaa

StaphyloaoccuB aureua

Streptococcus agalaotiae
  (microaerophlle)
Aepergillua niger (fungus)

Paecilomycea varioti
  (fungus)
StaphlococcuB aureue

MicrocoaouB conglomerate

Streptococcus oremorig

Streptococcus loctia

Leuconoetoc citrovorun

Leuconostoo dextronioum

Bacillus aereue (spores)

Bacillus polymyxa (spores)

Eecheriahia coli

Eecherichia intermedia

Salmonella typhimtrium

Peeudomonae aemginoea

Paeudomonae fluoreaceno

Paeudomonae fragi

Aakfomobacter butyri

Flavobacterium devorane
Growth not affected at 37°C
  for 48 hr
Growth not affected at 37°C
  for 48 hr
Growth inhibited

Growth inhibited

Growth inhibited


Growth inhibited

Growth inhibited

Growth Inhibited

Growth inhibited

Growth inhibited

Growth Inhibited
                                                                                     Growth

                                                                                     Growth

                                                                                     Growth

                                                                                     Growth

                                                                                     Growth

                                                                                     Growth

                                                                                     Growth

                                                                                     Growth
       inhibited

       Inhibited

       inhibited

       inhibited

       inhibited

       inhibited

       Inhibited

       inhibited
Reed and Dychdala,
  1964
Reed and Dychdala,
  1964
Reed and Dychdala,
  1964
Reed and Dychdala,
  1964
Reed and Dychdala,
  1964

Prior, Fennema, and
  Marth, 1970
Prior, Fennema, and
  Marth, 1970
Prior, Fennema, and
  Marth, 1970
Prior, Fennema, and
  Marth, 1970
Prior, Fennema, and
  Marth, 1970
Prior, Fennema, and
  Marth, 1970
Prior, Fennema, and
  Marth, 1970
Prior, Fennema, and
  Marth, 1970
Prior, Fennema, and
  Marth, 1970
Prior, Fennema, and
  Marth, 1970
Prior, Fennema, and
  Marth, 1970
Prior, Fennema, and
  Marth, 1970
Prior, Fennema, and
  Marth, 1970
Prior, Fennema, and
  Marth, 1970
Prior, Fennema, and
  Marth, 1970
Prior, Fennema, and
  Marth, 1970
                                                                                                                                                    U>

-------
                                                           TABLE 3.8 (continued)
      Compound
                                Treatment
                                        Species
                                            Effect
                                                                                                                             Reference
Fluorocarbon-11  and
  fluoYocarbon-12
  (mixture)
Genetron-2r
Genetron-23^
Genetron-152A"
Fluorocarbon-12
Vapor and liquid states

Vapor state


Vapor mixture (60:40)
S-min gassing treatment
  (30 ml/min); then 24 hr
  In gaseous atmosphere
S-min gassing treatment
  (30 mg/min); then 24 hr
  In gaseous atmosphere

S-min gassing treatment
  (30 ml/min); then 24 hr
  In gaseous atmosphere
S-min gassing treatment
  (30 mg/min); then 24 hr
  in gaseous atmosphere

S-min gassing treatment
  (30 ml/min); then 24 hr
  in gaseous atmosphere
5-mln gassing treatment
  (30 mg/min); then 24 hr
  in gaseous atmosphere

S-min gassing treatment
  (30 ml/min); then 24 hr
  in gaseous atmosphere
5-mln gassing treatment
  (30 mg/min); then 24 hr
  in gaseous atmosphere
Liquid, 2 hr, 22°C
Saaoharantyaee cereviaiae

Candida utilia

Eeaheriakia soli.
                                                     Bacillus eubtilie var. niger
Staphylocoacua aureua,
  coagulaae positive strain

Staphylococcue aureua,
  coagulase negative strain

Staphylococcue aureua,
  coagulase positive strain

Stophyloooccue aureua,
  coagulase negative strain

StophylococcuB aureua,
  coagulase positive strain

StophylocoacuB aureua,
  coagulase negative strain

StophylococouB aureua,
  coagulase positive strain

Stophyloooccua aureua,
  coagulase negative strain

Eaoheriohia aoli HS2
Growth inhibited

Growth inhibited


Rate of inactlvation slower
  than Prior et al. (1970)
  results; slowly lethal —
  l.OZ survivors after treat-
  ment for three weeks
Spores more resistant than
  E. coli vegetative cells


Decreased survival rate


Decreased survival rate
                                                                                     Increased survival rate and
                                                                                       coagulase production

                                                                                     Decreased survival rate
                                                                                     Increased survival rate and
                                                                                       coagulase production

                                                                                     Increased cell viability
                                                                                     Increased survival rate and
                                                                                       coagulase production

                                                                                     Increased cell viability
                                                                                     Inactivated young cells more
                                                                                       rapidly than old cells;
                                                                                       clumping; cytoplasm light
                                                                                       and grainy — less dense and
                                                                                       less uniform than control
Prior, Pennema, and
  Marth, 1970
Prior, Fennema, and
  Marth, 1970

Stretton, Gretton,
  and Watson-Walker,
  1971
Stretton, Gretton,
  and Watson-Walker,
  1971
Ouj esky and Bhagat,
  1973

Oujesky and Bhagat,
  1973
                                  Oujesky and Bhagat,
                                    1973

                                  Oujesky and Bhagat,
                                    1973
                                  Oujesky and Bhagat,
                                    1973

                                  Oujesky and Bhagat,
                                    1973
                                  Oujesky and Bhagat,
                                    1973

                                  Oujesky and Bhagat,
                                    1973

                                  Prior, Fennema, and
                                    Pate, 1975

-------
                                                           TABLE 3.8  (continued)
      Compound
                                Treatment
                                        Species
                                            Effect
                                        Reference
Fluoro_carbon-114
Fluorocarbon-21
                        1.25 x saturation for up
                          to 1200 mln, 22°C
5-mln gassing treatment
  (30 ml/min); then 24 hr
  In gaseous atmosphere
5-mln gassing treatment
  (30 rag/rain); then 24 hr
  In gaseous atmosphere

0.5Z to 1.5Z (wt/wt)
                             Eecherichia ooli ML30
Staphylococcua aureua,
  coagulase positive strain

Stophylocoecus aureus,
  coagulase negative strain

Saaoharomyaee cerevisiae
Decreased viability; 50Z loss
  of compounds absorbing at
  260 ran; 32% lysis; most
  changes in first 300 rain

Enhanced coagulase production
  and mannitol fermentation;
  decreased survival rate
Decreased survival rate
Inactivation greatest with (1)
  increasing concentrations,
  (2) increasing volume of
  medium, (3) Increasing tem-
  perature from 7°C to 47°C,
  (4) agitation, (5)  young
  cells (8 hr) rather than old
  (36 hr or 10 days), and (6)
  cells grown without glucose;
  treated cells resistant to
  lysis by sonication
                                                                                               Prior, Pennema, and
                                                                                                 Pate, 1975
Oujesky and Bhagat,
  1973

Oujesky and Bhagat,
  1973
Middleton, Marth,
  and Fennema, 1975
                                                                                                                                                     Ui
     .Freon-12, dichlorodifluoromethane.
      Freon-114, 1,2-dichlorotetrafluoroethane.
      ,1,1-Dif luoro-1-chloroe thane.
      Agitated for 48 hr at 21°C.  Vapor state:  vapor space saturated at 21°C, but amount insufficient to cause condensation.   Liquid
state (partial):  vapor space saturated; at low level, few drops of condensate in medium; at high level enough condensate In medium to bind
all water.
     SXrichlorofluoromethane.
     •'Fluorocarbon-21, dichlorofluoromethane.
     f Trlfluoromethane.
      1,1-Difluoroethane.

-------
                                      76
           TABLE 3.9.  SURVIVAL OF A COAGULASE-POSITIVE (GIORGIO)  STRAIN AND TWO
        COAGULASE-NEGATIVE STRAINS (GUINN AND ATCC 6020) OF STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS AS
       DETERMINED BY COLONY COUNTS AFTER EXPOSING THE BACTERIAL CELLS TO 5-min GASSING
           TREATMENT (30 ml/min) AND A SUBSEQUENT 24 hr IN THE GASEOUS ATMOSPHERE0
Gas used
for treatment

Air , compressed
Genetron-152A
Genetron-23
Genetron-21
Freon-12
Freon-114

Air

Genetron-152A

Genetron-23

Genetron-21

Freon-12

Freon-114

Strain








Guinn
ATCC 6020
Guinn
ATCC 6020
Guinn
ATCC 6020
Guinn
ATCC 6020
Guinn
ATCC 6020
Guinn
ATCC 6020
Untreated
controls
(cells/ml)
Coagulase
1.6 * 10*
1.0 x 10*
0.8 x 10*
1.7 x 10*
1.1 x 10*
1.2 x 10"
Coagulase
1.8 - 10*
1.9 x 107
1.5 x io»
1.9 x io7
1.3 « 10*
1.2 x io7
1.4 x ioa
2.7 x io7
1.0 x 10'
1.9 x io7
1.1 x 10*
1.6 x io7
Viable gas-
treated cells
(cells/ml)
positive
1.8 x 10*
1.0 x 10*
1.4 x io8
0.4 x io6
1.6 x 10*
1.0 x 10"
negative
1.9 x 10"
2.3 x io7
1.8 x io8
1.8 x io7
0.9 x 10'
1.0 x io7
0.3 x 10*
0
1.3 x 10*
2.4 x io7
0.9 x 10*
0.9 x io7
Survivors from
gas-treated cells
(Z i std deviation)

115.0 ± 14.0
106.0 ± 26.0
185.0 ± 19.0
0.2 ± 0.09
148.0 ± 5.0
84.3 ± 4.9

108.0 ± 9.0
121.0 ± 2.8
118.4 ± 13.6
95.0 ± 17.3
71.6 ± 19.4
85.0 ± 12.05
0.0024 i 0.0016
0
126.0 ± 18.4
124.5 ± 5.5
80.0 ± 7.0
55.9 ± 4.1
            Coagulase-posltive organisms were incubated on coagulase mannitol agar for
       24 hr at 37°C; coagulase-negative organisms were incubated on brain heart Infu-
       sion agar for 24 hr at 37°C.
           Source:  Adapted from Oujesky and Bhagat, 1973, Table 3, p. 232, and Table
       6, p. 234. Reprinted by permission of the publisher.
     Some  fluorinated bases are used as  antimicrobial,  and often anti-
tumor,  agents.  For example, 5-trifluoromethyl-2'-deoxyuridine has been
used to treat herpes virus infections.   It appears  (Clough, Wigdahl, and
Parkhurst, 1978) that this compound is hydrolyzed to yield S-carboxy-21-
deoxyuridine, which is  the active agent  that upsets DNA synthesis at the
level of the de novo biosynthetic pathway for pyrimidine biosynthesis.
Fluoridated compounds are also widely used as anesthetics.  Among the
best known ones are halothane (2-bromo-2-chloro-l,l,l  trifluoroethane)
and methoxyflurane (CHC13-CF2-OCH3).  These agents  are active against
microorganisms and microbial responses.   Many of these responses seem to
involve the loss of normal microtubular  structure as shown in the follow-
ing examples:  loss of  motility of Tetrdhymena pyriformis (Nunn, Dixon,
and Moore, 1968); immobilization and stoppage of cytoplasmic streaming
in amoebae (Bruce and Christiansen, 1965); collapse of heliozoan axopods
(Allison et al., 1970);  inhibition of cell division of Tetrahymena
(Kirkness  and MacDonald,  1972); and inhibition of bacterial luminescence
(Halsey and Smith, 1970).

     A  very dramatic bacterial response  to growth in fluoridated media
was described by Lesher,  Bender, and Marquis (1977).   Massive lysis
occurred in cultures of Bacillus subtilis, Neisseria aitbflava, and a
micrococcus called LYT  following growth  in the presence of 5 or 10 mAf
sodium  fluoride.  The action appeared to be the result of activation of

-------
                                   77


autqlytic enzymes rather than to any restriction in the supply of phos-
phoenolpyruvate, the production of the enolase reaction needed for the
synthesis of the cell-wall structural polymer peptidoglycan.  Only bacte-
ria with active autolytic systems underwent lysis, but increased turnover
of peptidoglycan occurred in other organisms during growth in fluoridated
media.  Therefore, in some instances, it is evident that fluoride can be
bactericidal instead of only bacteriostatic.

     It appears also that some fluoride preparations can actually kill
bacteria and serve as deplaquing agents as well as cariostatic agents.
For example, Mtlhlemann and Strub (1975) reported a 21.5% reduction in the
sulcular plaque index due to daily rinsing by human subjects with 0.025%
amine fluoride solution.  Andres, Shaeffer, and Windeler (1974) found
that mouth washing with 0.5% SnF2 solution, but not 0.27% sodium fluoride
solution, reduced the number of viable bacteria in saliva.  Tinanoff,
Brady, and Gross (1976) showed that daily mouth rinsing with SnFa solution
(100 ppm fluoride) reduced early plaque formation, while sodium fluoride
at an equivalent fluoride concentration was ineffective with once-a-day
application but effective when used twice a day.

     The antiplaque activity of topical fluoride preparations apparently
has a number of bases.  For one, it appears that fluoride can inhibit
initial colonization of hydroxyapatite by oral bacteria (Rolla, 1977).
In addition, the counterion for fluoride may cause more damage than the
fluoride itself.  Thus, Sna+, alkyl amines, and a pH of 3.2 are all very
damaging to bacterial cells.  However, it should be pointed out that
sodium fluoride or potassium fluoride solutions can act as deplaquing
agents when they are used frequently, and it seems that it must be the
fluoride in those solutions that is the active agent.

     There has been considerable use in caries prevention of monofluoro-
phosphate, especially in fluoride toothpastes.  However, recent studies
by Pearce and Jenkins  (1976, 1977) indicated that fluorophosphate was no
more effective than sodium fluoride in reducing acid production in human
saliva and that, in fact, it is decomposed by saliva to yield fluoride,
which is probably the active inhibitory agent.

     Many strains of oral bacteria can become acclimatized  to fluoride.
This acclimation process was studied in several oral streptococcal strains
(Williams, 1964, 1967,  1968).  Williams  (1964) found that several strains
of Streptococcus faecalis adapted to sodium fluoride  (concentrations not
reported).  These fluoride-adapted cells  exhibited a longer  lag phase
than control cells, whether in the presence or absence of fluoride.  Five
strains of Lancefield group D streptococci — HT25 and 680  (isolated from
human dental plaque), Streptococcus zymogenes NCIB 8886, Streptococcus
faecalis NCDO 580, and  Streptococcus faecalis NCTC 370 — were  "fluoride
trained" by growing in  2 mW fluoride for  four days,  then  for four days in
10 mW, 33 vM, and 100 mW fluoride successively.   The  adapted cultures grew
more successfully in high fluoride concentrations than control strains in
the absence of fluoride.  If these cultures were  grown for  two to three
days in fluoride-free medium, they lost  their  fluoride resistance.  Using
strain HT25, Williams  (1968) found that both  fluoride-acclimated cells and

-------
                                   78


control cells were quite permeable to fluoride; however, the acclimated
cells appeared to be less permeable.  Perhaps the difference was due to
factors such as differences in culture, pH, and growth phase.  The bacte-
ria were grown overnight in 8.5 ppm fluoride at 37°C, and the volume of
cell protoplasts was estimated using a radioactive sulfate technique.

     Permanent or genotypic resistance to fluoride in S. sdlivarius was
studied by Hamilton (1977).  Hamilton also noted that slowly metabolizing
bacteria are more fluoride resistant than rapidly metabolizing bacteria.
Hamilton and Ellwood (1978) found that cells of 5. mutans strain Ingbritt,
grown anaerobically in a chemostat at pH 5.5, were more fluoride resistant
and had higher glycolytic capacities than cells grown at higher pH values
of 6.0 or 6.5.

     Frostell and Ericsson (1978) stated that bacteria readily became
resistant to fluoride when grown in its presence and that dental-plaque
bacteria in areas with fluoridated water acquired fluoride tolerance.  It
should be noted that fluoride intake in areas of the United States without
water fluoridation may be nearly as great as that in fluoridated areas
because of consumption of foods and beverages processed with fluoridated
water.  Rosen, Frea, and Hsu (1978) indicated that fluoride-resistant var-
iants of 5. nrutans were less cariogenic than parent strains, and that the
carious process produced by the variants could be suppressed by fluoride.
They concluded that their findings favored a mechanism for the anticaries
activity of fluoride that does not involve direct inhibition of bacterial
metabolism.  However, some caution is needed because many fluoride-resist-
ant mutants,  for  example those studied by Hamilton (1977), are resistant
at pH values  near neutrality but are still sensitive at lower pH values.
Clearly, dental-plaque bacteria have had to adapt to the presence of mil-
limolar levels of fluoride.

     Herbison and Handelman  (1975) tested the effects of fluoride on five
antigenic  strains (AHT, BHT, GS-5, LM-7, and SLIR; antigenic types a, b3 c,
d, and E respectively) of Streptococcus mutccns in vitro.  Fluoride  (0.15,
1.5, and 15 ppm)  reduced hydroxyapatite solubility in three strains.  In
combination with  strontium  (1.7, 17.0, and 170 ppm), solubilization was
reduced even  further.  Fluoride at 1.5 ppm reduced acid production in the
five strains.  This reduction was negated by the addition of 17 ppm stron-
tium.  No  significant effect was observed in four strains grown on agar
plates  that were  treated with fluoride at concentrations of 0.15, 1.5,
and  15  ppm.

     The cariogenic K-l strain of S. mutans has been the subject of much
study on the  anticaries effect of fluoride (Luoma, 1972a, 19722?, 1973;
Luoma,  Ranta,  and Turtola, 1971).  The addition of fluoride causes leakage
of potassium  and  phosphorus from both fermenting and nonfermenting cells
and  reduces acid  production.  The current opinion by many researchers is
that fluoride does not directly inhibit the phosphotransferase system for
sugar uptake.  Schachtele and Mayo (1973) found no such inhibition.  How-
ever, fluoride can indirectly inhibit the system by inhibiting the enolase
reaction.  Also,  Marquis  (1977) found that fluoride could inhibit strepto-
coccal membrane ATPase.  This inhibition could reduce potassium uptake by
the  cells.

-------
                                   79


     At pH values of 5.2 and 5.8, 50 ppm fluoride caused leakage of cel-
lular potassium in fermenting systems (Luoma, 1972a).   At higher pH levels
(6.8 and 8.4), 100 ppm fluoride slightly reduced cellular potassium leak-
age.  Twenty-five ppm fluoride, alone or in combination with 6% ethanol,
reduced the cellular potassium and phosphorus levels in nonfermenting
cells.  The concentration of phosphorus was less affected.  Chlorhexidine,
a compound used effectively to remove dental plaque (Gjermo and RSlla,
1971, as cited in Luoma, 19722)), had previously been found to cause leak-
age of cellular phosphorus in micrococci (Rye and Wiseman, 1964, as cited
in Luoma, 1972a).  Luoma (1972Z?) tested the action of fluoride on strain
K-l of S. mutans at concentrations of 25, 50, 75, and 100 ppm alone or
in combination with chlorhexidine (12.5 to 50.0 ppm).   He found reduced
cellular potassium and phosphorus concentrations in fermenting cells.
Sodium levels increased in cells incubated without sucrose at 50 ppm flu-
oride, 12.5 ppm chlorhexidine, or a combination of both.  If the incuba-
tion mixture contained sucrose, cells treated with 50 ppm fluoride or 50
ppm fluoride plus 12.5 ppm chlorhexidine had about the same sodium concen-
tration as untreated systems.  A pretreatment with 50 ppm fluoride had
little effect on acid production by strain K-l; however, 50 ppm fluoride
plus 50 ppm chlorhexidine completely inhibited acid production.  Further
testing  (Luoma, 1973) showed that fluoride in combination with chlorhexi-
dine and propanol produced the greatest reductions in potassium and phos-
phorus concentrations in the cells and the greatest reduction in acid
production.  The results of Luoma1s research are interesting, but they
have not been fully interpreted.

     Loesche et al. (1975) found that acidulated phosphate fluoride gel
may be an effective oral antimicrobial agent.  They compared the percent-
age of S. mutans and S. sanguis present in dental plaque samples before
and after treatment with acidulated phosphate fluoride.  Prior to treat-
ment, 5. mutans comprised about 9% of the colony-forming units in the
occlusal plaque and 1%  in the  approximal plaque.  5. sanguis comprised
about 5% of the colony-forming units in the  approximal plaque and 8% in
the occlusal plaque.  In the test, 10 ml of  gel  containing 1.23% fluoride
ion in 0.1 M phosphoric acid solution at pH  3.2 was applied 8 to 10  times
daily for 8 to 10 days  to 44 boys, 14 to 16  years old.  The acidulated
phosphate fluoride caused reductions of 45%  to  75%  of 5. mutans in occlu-
sal samples but had no  effect  in  approximal  samples.  No  effect was
observed on S. sanguis  populations.

3.3.2  Metabolic Effects

     This discussion on microbial metabolic  effects caused by fluoride
compounds deals with four topics:   (1)  energy  transfer,  (2) carbohydrate
metabolism, (3) protein synthesis and nucleic  acid  metabolism,  and  (4)
enzymatic activity.

3.3.2.1  Energy Transfer —  Inorganic fluoride  can interfere with microbial
energy-transfer processes.   Examples are  inhibition of  respiration,  photo-
synthesis, and  carbohydrate metabolism (Section 3.3.2.2).   Effects  of
sodium fluoride on respiration of the  aquatic  fungi Allomyces  javanicus

-------
                                      80
and Brevilegnia unisperma var. delioa  in the presence and absence of  glu-
cose are shown in Table 3.10 (Thakur and Dayal, 1971);  inhibition was
greatest in the presence of glucose.   A concentration of 10 wM fluoride
caused  95% inhibition  of A. javanicus  respiration.   Studies involving the
green algae Chlorella  vulgaris and Chlorella pyrenoidoea showed that  endog-
enous respiration rates were not decreased by the  individual addition of
40 mW sodium fluoride  or 8 wM copper sulfate.  However, if both agents
were added simultaneously, oxygen uptake was almost  completely inhibited
(Hassall, 1967; Sargent and Taylor, 1972).  Sodium fluoride (50 roAf) treat-
ment of dormant conidia of N. ovassa induced premature conidia germination
and also decreased  the rate of respiration (Figure 3.5) (Timberlake and
Turian, 1975).
              TABLE 3.10. EFFECTS OF FLUORIDE ON RESPIRATION OF THE AQUATIC FUNGI
                  ALLOMYCES JAVANICUS AND BREVTLECNIA UHISPEPHA VAR. DELICA
                               Allomjcee javanicua
              Brevilegnia unieperma
Treatment
Molecular
oxygen
as percent
of control
Percent
inhibition
Molecular
oxygen
as percent
of control
Percent
inhibition
          Control
                                175
                                                     110
In absence of glucose
0.01 M fluoride
0.005 H fluoride
In presence of glucose
0.01 M fluoride
0.005 M fluoride

127
148

80
137

48
27

95
38

80
93

66
83

30
17

44
27
              Source:  Adapted from Thakur and Dayal, 1971, Table 2, p. 467.
          by permission of the publisher.
                        Reprinted
                              90

                              80

                              70
                            3.
                            Q M
                            tu
                            N
                            _J 40
                            I-

                            oN301

                              20

                              10
ORNL-DWG 76-16556R


         /-NoF
          NoF
                               0123
                                NoF TREATMENT (hr)

      Figure  3.5.   Oxygen uptake during NaF treatment of Neurospora
 Source:  Adapted  from Timberlake and Turian, 1975,  Figure 5, p.  153.
 Reprinted by permission of the  publisher.

-------
                                   81


     Fluoride has been used as an inhibitor of photosynthesis in the
green alga Chlorella (Warburg, 1962) and of photosynthesis and the quinone
Hill reaction in the blue-green bacteria Plectonema boryanian and Andbaena
vandbiHs (Vennesland and Turkington, 1966a, 19662>).  Potassium fluoride
at a concentration of 20 mM in the absence of carbon dioxide and at pH 5.8
almost completely inhibited the quinone Hill reaction in washed suspensions
of P. bopyamon and A. variabiHs.  Fluoride inhibition increased with de-
creasing pH.   Figure 3.6 illustrates the effect of fluoride at pH 5.2
on photosynthesis and on the Hill reaction in P.  boryanum cell suspensions.
Photosynthesis was more sensitive to fluoride than was the Hill reaction.
                                      ORNL-DWG 76H6557R
100
_ 80
— 60
o"
40

20
/
/No KF
- /
/ 0.001 M KF
/ ( / ^
./6.003>t/KF
^— / S 1
/ * I ^/«^^^^5 ^n K r
NoKF
/ /O.OOI/l/KF
//. 0.003 A/KF
_ •//. 0.005 MKf
>l ' ' ^
~ ////
:•//'
7 , i
20  40       0  20
       TIME  (min)
                                           40
     Figure 3.6.  Effect of fluoride at pH 5.2 on photosynthesis (left)
and on the Hill reaction (right) in Plectonema boryanum cell suspensions,
Source:  Adapted from Vennesland and Turkington, 1966a, Figure 2, p. 154,
Reprinted by permission of the publisher.
3.3.2.2  Carbohydrate Metabolism — Fluoride influences several aspects
of carbohydrate metabolism,  including  sugar uptake, acid production, and
enzyme activities.  Many  of  these  studies have  involved cariogenic bacteria
and attempts at elucidating  the mode of  action  of  fluoride  in reduction
of caries.  Information indicates  that the effect  of  fluoride on  sugar
metabolism involves bacterial membranes  (Luoma  and Tuompo,  1975;  Schachtele
and Mayo, 1973).  Table 3.11 lists some  effects of fluorides on several
aspects of microbial carbohydrate  metabolism.   The concentrations tested
ranged from 0.01 to 47.5  mW  sodium fluoride.  At low  fluoride concentra-
tions, stimulation of phosphqrylase and  carbon  dioxide formation  in sali-
vary organisms and of glucose fermentation by E. coli are reported  (Table
3.11).

     Weiss et al. (1965)  found that fluoride at concentrations as low as 1
to 10 ppm affected the rate  of synthesis of iodophilic polysaccharides from
glucose, maltose, and sucrose by Streptococcus  mitis; fluoride inhibition
was reversed with time.   Figure 3.7 shows the rapid effect  of fluoride at

-------
                      TABLE 3.11.  EFFECTS OF FLUORIDE (NaF) ON MICROBIAL CARBOHYDRATE METABOLISM
      Organism
Concentration
    (mW)
                    Effect
         Reference
Eacherichia aoli
Yeast
Aepergillua niger
Streptococcus and
  LactobacilluB sp.
Yeast
Streptococcus
  aalivarius
Eaaherichia coli
Salivary sediment
  mixtures
  0.01

  0.05

  0.05

  0.01


  0.1

  2.4


  0.06


  1.2

  2.4
  4.8



  9.6


  50
  1.0

  £0.22
  0.22, 1.0
Activation of glucose fermentation

Activation of fermentation

Inhibition of citric acid production

Inhibition of acid production


Inhibition of pyrophosphatase

Inhibition of glucose uptake; reduction in
  cellular glucose-6-P; inhibition of intra-
  cellular enolase activity
Decrease in cellular glucose-6-P in cells
  metabolizing glucose if added before or
  after substrate
Stimulation of phosphorylase activity

Stimulation of phosphorylase activity; imme-
  diate decrease in cellular glucose-6-P and
  ATP in cells actively degrading glucose;
  complete inhibition of glucose uptake and
  glycogen synthesis
Inhibition of ADPG pyrophosphorylase

Inhibition of ADPG glucan transferase

Inhibition of phosphoglucomutase


Inhibition of phosphatases that hydrolyze
  o-methyl-D-glucose-6-P; inhibition strong
  at acid pH, but no inhibition at alkaline
  pH; in vivo phosphorylation and dephosphor-
  ylation inhibited at acid pH

Stimulation of C02 formation from glucose at
  acid pH
No effect on C0a formation
Inhibition of lactic acid and total acid
  production
Venkateswarlu, 1970

Venkateswarlu, 1970

Venkateswarlu, 1970

Venkateswarlu, 1970


Venkateswarlu, 1970

Kanapka and Hamilton, 1971
                                                                                            Kanapka, Khandelwal, and
                                                                                              Hamilton, 1971

                                                                                            Kanapka, Khandelwal, and
                                                                                              Hamilton, 1971
                                                                                            Kanapka, Khandelwal, and
                                                                                              Hamilton, 1971
Kanapka, Khandelwal, and
  Hamilton, 1971
Kanapka, Khandelwal, and
  Hamilton, 1971
Kanapka, Khandelwal, and
  Hamilton, 1971

Haguenauer and Kepes, 1972
                                 oo
                                 ts>
Sandham and Kleinberg, 1973

Sandham and Kleinberg, 1973
Sandham and Kleinberg, 1973

-------
                                                TABLE 3.11 (continued)
      Organism
Concentration
    (mW)
                    Effect
         Reference
Entamoeba hietolytiaa      25

Bacillus                   a
  atearothermophilus
Streptococcus mutans
  47.5
Blocking of glycolysis; no effect on initial
  transport rate of 10 mW 3-0-methylglucose

Inhibition of a-methyl-D-glucoside accumulation
  in presence of ATP and Embden-Meyerhoff-
  Parnas pathway Intermediates; fluoride plus
  sodium azide almost completely inhibited
  transport of a-methyl-D-glucoside with NADH
  as cosubstrate

Inhibition of sugar uptake, partially allevi-
  ated by potassium; potassium extruded from
  both fermenting and nonfermenting cells —
  accompanied by rapid F~ uptake by ferment-
  ing cells, then immediate release of F"
  back into the medium; intracellular sugar
  changes slight; complete inhibition of acid
  production
                                                                   Serrano and Reeves,  1974


                                                                   O'Leary, Busta, and  McKay,
                                                                     1975
Luoma and Tuorapo, 1975
                                                                                                                              CO
                                                                                                                              co
      Fluoride concentration not given.

-------
                                    84
                   700
                  600
                 GJ 500
                 u
                 o>
                 E 400
                 g 300
                 O
200

100

  0
     FLUORIDE
     ADDITION
  ORNL-OWG 76-I65S8R



        CONTROL
——^_	• 10 ppm F"
                            "~-« 15 ppm F"

                            ~— - 20 ppm F"
                                                  50 ppm F"
                           30    60    90    120
                                   TIME (min)
                             150
     Figure 3.7.  Effect of fluoride on an.  actively synthesizing poly-
saccharide system of Streptococcus mitis.   Source:   Adapted from Weiss
et al., 1965, Figure 3, p. 842.  Reprinted  by  permission of the publisher,
concentrations of 15 ppm and higher on glucose incorporation.  At 50 ppm
fluoride, bacterial incorporation of sugar ceased about 2 hr after fluoride
addition and degradation of intracellular polysaccharide occurred.  Sodium
monofluorophosphate (Na2F09F) was also tested and was found to be less in-
hibitory to polysaccharide synthesis than sodium fluoride.  Inhibition of
polysaccharide synthesis, especially synthesis of capsular dextrans and
levans, also occurred  in the cariogenic bacterium S.  mutccns (Bowen and
Hewitt, 1974).  The production  of dextran (polyglucan) and levan (poly-
fructan) was altered by 70 ppm  fluoride in five different strains of S.
mutone.  The ratio of  fructose  to glucose was significantly higher in cul-
tures grown in the presence of  70 ppm fluoride than in control cultures
grown in the absence of fluoride.  However, Schachtele (1977) was unable
to  show inhibition of  various forms of the enzyme glucosyl transferase,
even at fluoride concentrations as high as 26.3 mW.  He also indicated a
high level of resistance for other enzymes involved in metabolism of dex-
trans and levans.

     Yost and VanDemark (1978)  found that Leuconoatoc mesenteroides,
which does not transport sugars by the phosphoenolpyruvate-requiring
phosphotransferase system, was  less sensitive to fluoride in terms of
growth inhibition than S. mutons, which does have the phosphotransferase
system.

     In addition, Kashket, Rodriguez, and Bunick (1977) found that very
low levels of fluoride inhibit  glucose utilization by oral streptococci
and do not have any stimulatory action.  The whole subject of the effects
of  fluoride on carbohydrate uptake and metabolism was reviewed by Hamilton
 (1977).

-------
                                    85


3.3.2.3  Protein Synthesis and Nucleic Acid Metabolism — Of the fluorinated
compounds that can alter protein synthesis and nucleic acid metabolism of
microorganisms, the substrate analogs p-fluorophenylalanine (p-FPhe), 5-
fluorodeoxyuridine (FdUrd), and 5-fluorouracil (FU) have been the most
widely studied.  Their incorporation into biopolymers and the resulting
metabolic effects were reviewed by Heidelberger (1972) and Fowden (1972).

     Mandel (1969) extensively reviewed data on the incorporation of FU
into RNA.  Table 3.1 (Section 3.2.1) shows that 5% to 80% of the original
uracil in several bacterial and fungal species and viruses can be replaced
by FU.  In most cases the incorporation could be reversed by the addition
of uracil.  Subcellular effects of FU replacement of uracil included alter-
ations in ribosomal composition and properties; changes in the functions,
properties, and base composition of transfer RNA (£RNA); and modifications
in the functions of messenger RNA.  Recently, more work has been done using
E. coli B tRNA.  Lowrie and Bergquist (1968) obtained up to 100% replace-
ment of uracil by FU in tRNA, and Kaiser (1969, 1971) obtained 80% to 84%
replacement.  Lowrie and Bergquist found that the secondary structure of
FU-tRNA was altered.  However, Kaiser (1971) reported that fluorouridine
replacement of uridine and uridine-related minor base components had only
minor effects on secondary and tertiary properties, especially in the pres-
ence of Mg2+.  The FU-tRNA retained about 90% of its ability to accept
amino acids (Kaiser, 1969).

     Cohen et al. (1958) determined that the inhibitory effect of FdUrd
on DNA synthesis in E.  eoli was due to the inhibition of thymidylate syn-
thetase by the phosphorylated 5*-monophosphate of FdUrd.  In this case,
the fluorinated pyrimidine is not incorporated into the nucleic acid but
rather prevents the synthesis of a component (thymidylate) essential for
DNA replication.

     The enzyme thymidylate synthetase can be inhibited in some micro-
organism cells by the fluorinated base 5-fluorocytosine.  The major source
of deoxythymidylate for DNA synthesis is thus suppressed.   Inhibition ap-
pears to result from formation of 5-fluorodeoxyuridylate which can irre-
versibly bind to thymidylate synthetase to inactivate it.   The kinetics
of the reaction with the enzyme from Lactobacillus casei were described
(Danenberg and Danenberg, 1978).

     Mandelbaum-Shavit and Kisliuk (1978) investigated mutants of Pedio-
coccus eerevisiae resistant to FdUrd.  They defined two types:  one with
reduced or absent thymidylate kinase activity, which is thought to be in-
volved in thymidine uptake by bacterial cells; and the other with impaired
permeability to the fluoronucleotide but with normal kinase activity.

     5-Trifluoromethyl-2f-deoxyuridine (F3Thd) at 1 vM irreversibly inhib-
ited replication of vaccinia virus (the W.R. neurotropic strain) in HeLaS3
cell cultures (mycoplasma-free) with selective toxicity to the virus (Umeda
and Heidelberger, 1969).  FdUrd (1 vM) did not selectively inhibit the
virus.  Its inhibition was transient, occurring primarily on the first day.
Umeda and Heidelberger concluded that the major antiviral activity of F3Thd
was probably due to its incorporation into viral DNA.

-------
                                    86
     The incorporation of p-FPhe into microbial protein can cause many
diverse effects.  When incorporated into E. coli B ISj- it blocked cell
division; it also blocked ribonucleic acid polymerase synthesis when  thy-
mine was added at the same time to thymine-starved cultures (Hardy and
Binkley, 1967).  In E. ooli the interference with cell division seemed to
be with the initiation of DNA replication.  Other consequences of p-FPhe
incorporation into microbial protein were discussed by Fowden  (1972).
These include alterations in shape and size of cells, interference with
cell differentiation, and alterations of eukaryotic chromosomes.

     The fluorinated base 5-fluorocytosine, usually in combination with
amphotericin B, has been used for many years for treatment of  infections
caused by yeasts of the genera Candida, Torulcpeie, and Ciyptoeoeeus.  The
mode of action in Candida appears (Polak and Scholer, 1975) to involve met-
abolic conversion to 5-fluorouridylate, which is then incorporated into RNA
with up to 502 replacement of uracil.  The replacement then leads to  dis-
turbances in protein synthesis.  There was no indication  of conversion to
5-fluorodeoxyuridylate in Candida or for inhibition of thymidylate
synthetase.

     An uncoupler of photophosphorylation, carbonylcyanide-p-trifluoro-
methoxyphenylhydrazone (FCCP) at 1.5 * 10~7 M inhibited replication of the
virulent bacteriophage RC1 in the nonsulfur purple photosynthetic bacterium
RhodopBeudomonas oapeulata strain Z-l  (Figure 3.8)  (Schmidt, Ten, and Gest,
1974).  The growth rate of the uninfected control plus 1.5 * 10~7 M FCCP
was substantial, but the infected cells in the presence of FCPP did not
                                          ORNL-OW6 76-4656O
                  UO
                 0.5
- 10*
                  O.I
                    I
                                 2468
                                 INCUBATION TIME (hr)
      Figure 3.8.   Effect of the phosphorylation uncoupler carbonylcyanide-
 p-trifluoromethoxy-phenylhydrazone (FCCP)  on replication of RC1 phage in
 photosynthetically grown cells of Rhodopeeudomonas eapeulata Z-l incubated
 under photosynthetic conditions.   Source:   Adapted from Schmidt, Ten, and
 Gest, 1974, Figure 4, p. 235.   Reprinted by permission of the publisher.

-------
                                   87
show production of progeny phage.  The phage requirement for energy was
more stringent than that of the bacterial host cell.

     Inorganic fluoride can inhibit several reactions involving nucleic
acids.  Effects of sodium fluoride (50 off) on //. c??O33c (protein,  RNA, and
DNA synthesis reduction) are illustrated in Figure 3.9 (Timberlake and
Turian, 1975).  The cultures used were submerged pregerminated conidia.
Leucine incorporation into protein was the most rapidly reduced.   Fluoride
inhibits DNA polymerase activity in the presence of Mg2+ (Hellung-Larsen
and Klenow, 1969; Lehman et al., 1958).  Hellung-Larsen and Klenow reported
that 0.16 M potassium fluoride caused 90% inhibition of DNA polymerase of
E. coli B.  They correlated inhibition with the formation of precipitable
complexes containing Mg2*, substrate phosphatases, and fluoride.
                                      ORNL-DWG 76-16559R
                            123          •<*
                           NoF TREATMENT (hr)

     Figure 3.9.  Effect of NaF treatment on protein, RNA, and DNA
synthesis of Senroapora crassa.  Source:  Adapted from Timberlake and
Turian, 1975, Figure 4, p. 153.  Reprinted by permission of the publisher.
     Fluoride may have important effects on nucleotide metabolism.  For
example, Khandelwal and Hamilton (1971) found that fluoride stimulated the
adenyl cyclase enzyme of S. saHvariuB, and it is possible that this action
may have important effects on the regulatory circuits of microorganisms.
Marquis (1977) found that fluoride inhibited the membrane ATPase of S.
faeealia and suggested that this action could be partly responsible for
the potassium deficiency of cells treated with fluoride.

-------
                                     88


3.3.2.4   Enzyme Activities — Inhibition of  enzymes responsible for acid
production may be especially important in the study of cariogenesis
(Jenkins, 1970).  The enzyme of the Embden-Meyerhof pathway most sensi-
tive  to  fluoride is enolase  (Jenkins, 1970;  Warburg and Christian, 1942),
although the actual site of  enzyme inhibition in saliva seems  to be one
involving glucose uptake by  the cell  (Jenkins, 1970) and ionic transport
(Luoma and Tuompo, 1975).

      Effects of fluorides on a variety of microbial enzyme systems are
given in Tables 3.12 and 3.13.  In general,  varying degrees of inhibition
are indicated, although the  respiration and rate of multiplication of
certain  yeasts are enhanced.  Table 3.14 indicates no inhibitory effects
of fluoride (up to 9.6  nrtf) on the activity  of several enzymes  involved in
the synthesis and degradation of glycogen in crude extracts of Strepto-
coccus salivarius (Kanapka,  Khandelwal, and Hamilton, 1971).   Additional
information concerning  fluoride effects on  carbohydrate metabolism is in
Section  3.3.2.2.  Table 3.15 lists some effects of 5-fluorouracil (FU) on
various  microbial enzymes (Mandel, 1969).   The inhibitory action of FU
seems to involve the fidelity of protein synthesis on FU-substituted mRNA.
              TABLE 3.12.  ENZYME INHIBITION BY SOLUBLE FLUORIDES
                Organism            Enzyme system        Effect*2


             Bacidiomycetes    Acid phosphononoesterase      +-H-
             Yeast            Adaptive fermentation of      -H-
                               galactose
                              Cell permeability            +
                              Fermentation                 -H-
                              Glycogen storage             -H-
                              Multiplication
                              Respiration                  -H-
             Yeast top         Respiration
                              Acetycholinesterase          ?
                              Apozymase + cozymase          +
                              Cytochrome oxidase           0
                              Glucosulphatase              ++•
                              Invertase                   0
                              Phosphatase (in vitro)        +
                              Phosphatase (in vitro)
                               reactivation
                              Succinodehydrogenase
                              Takadiastase on
                               glycerophosphates
                              Takasulphatase


                   0 indicates no effect; + to +-H- indicates vary-
             ing degrees of inhibition; - to — indicates promotion.

                  Source:  Adapted from Eagers, 1969, Table 16,
             pp. 107-108.  Data collected from several sources.
             Reprinted by permission of the publisher.

-------
TABLE 3.13.  EFFECTS OF FLUORIDE ON HICROBIAL ENZYMATIC ACTIVITY
Enzyae
Inorganic pyrophosphatase


B-Galactoaldase






Fungal lactaae A and B




p-Nltrophenylphosphataae

Phytase
Source Compound
Farrobaoillua fgrro- KF
oxidona (ThiobocilluB
ftnooxtdona)
Beoheriohia ooli p-Toluenesulfonyl
fluoride
Phenylatethane sul-
fonyl fluoride



Polyporoue vereioolof F"




Streptococcus mitana NaF

Pseudanonae sp. F"
Concentration
10'1 H


Enough to inhibit
protein breakdown
300 ug/nl




1 equivalent




0.67-1.67 nV

1.0-8.0 vN
Effect
90X inhibition


Blocked Induction in
starving cells
Blocked induction in
starving cells;
slight inhibition In
cells growing on
glycerol
Almost conplete inhi-
bition when bound to
type 2 Cu1*; inhibi-
tion decreased in
presence of substrate
No repressive or
induclve effect
Inhibition varied as
Reference
Howard and Lundgren,
1970

Goldberg, 1971

Goldberg. 1971




Brandon. Malastroai,
and VHnngard, 1973



Knuuttlla and HHklnen,
1973
Irving and Cosgrove,
                                                             the cube of fluoride
                                                             ion concentration
                                                                                       1971
                                                                                                                     00
                                                                                                                     VO

-------
                                           90
           TABLE 3.1A.  INFLUENCE OF SODIUM FLUORIDE ON THE ENZYMES INVOLVED
           IN THE SYNTHESIS AND DEGRADATION OF GLYCOGEN IN CRUDE EXTRACTS OF
                               STREPTOCOCCUS SALIVARIUS
                  Enzyme
                                                Activity of enzyme
                                             at NaF  (mtf) concentration
                                              1.2
                          2.A
            A.8
    7.2
9.6
Phosphoglucomutase
Preincubation
No incubation
ADPG pyrophosphorylase
ADPG glucan transferase
Phosphorylase

lA7a 159
147, 159
8r 90
106j 107
235 363

171
1A7
97
111
A07

1A7
1A7
85
108


171
1A7


450
               .Nanomoles glucose-6-P formed per milligram protein per minute.
                Picomoles ADP-glucose formed per milligram protein per minute.
                •Nanomoles glycogen formed per milligram protein per minute.
               T'icomoles glucose-1-P incorporated into glycogen per milligram
          protein per minute.

               Source:  Adapted from Kanapka, Khandelwal, and Hamilton,  1971,
          Table II, p. 600.  Reprinted by permission of the publisher.
        TABLE 3.15.  EFFECTS OF 5-FLUOROURACIL INCORPORATION ON ENZYMATIC ACTIVITY
        Enzyme
     Source
  Effect
                                             Comments
8-Galactosidase
Succinate dehydrogenase
Catalase
D-Serine dehydrase
8-Glucuronidase
Serine deaminase
Glucose-6-phosphate
  dehydrogenase
Alkaline phosphatase
Ribonuclease

Deoxyribonuclease
Ribonuclease
Alkaline phosphatase
a-Amylase

Aconitase
Malate dehydrogenase
Fumarase
Succinate dehydrogenase
NADH oxidase
Penicillinase
d-Aminolevulinate
  synthetase
Succinate dehydrogenase
ct-Glucosidase

Galactosidase
Eeche-pichia aoli
E. aoli
E. aoli.
E. aoli
E. ooli
E. aoli
E. ooli

E. coli
Staphylococcue
  aureus
S. aureus
Bacillus subtilie
B. Bubtilia
B. aubtilis

Bacillus cereuB
B. cereue
B. cereua
B. aereus
B. cereuB
B. cereus
Rhodopeeudomonae
  apheroidee
P. spheroidea
Soodhoromycee
  carlebergenaiB
S. carlebergenaie
Inhibition
Stimulation
None
Inhibition
Inhibition
None
None

None
Inhibition

None
Inhibition
Inhibition
None

Inhibition
Inhibition
Inhibition
None
None
None
Inhibition

None
None

None
Inducible and constitutive;
  occasionally reversed by
  uracil; decreased enzyme
  specific activity
Constitutive
Constitutive
Inducible
Constitutive (?)
Decreased thermostabillty
Inconclusive

Inconclusive
Exoenzyme
Inducible
Exoenzyme; thermostability
  unchanged
Constitutive
Constitutive
Constitutive
Constitutive
Constitutive
Inducible
Uracil reversed effect
Inducible; no qualitative
  change
Inducible; no qualitative
  change
     Source:  Adapted from Mandel, 1969, Table 6, p.
sources.  Reprinted by permission of the publisher.
                          117.  Data collected from several

-------
                                    91


 3.4  PROSPECTS FOR FUTURE RESEARCH

 3.4.1   Inorganic Fluorides

 3.4.1.1 Dental and Medical Uses — It seems unquestionably clear that there
 will be extensive future use of fluorides as anticaries agents, and since
 they do have antiplaque properties, possible use of them against periodon-
 tal disease.  A study by Erickson (1978) of mortality rates in 24 cities
 with fluoridated water and 22 with nonfluoridated water revealed no signif-
 icant differences between the two.  Therefore, the view that water fluorid-
 ation has no harmful effects was supported.  These findings are encouraging
 for more extensive use of water fluoridation in the United States and other
 industrialized countries.  Of course, this increased use means greater
 exposure of microorganisms, as well as humans, to fluorides.

     There is currently an increasing incidence of dental caries, even in
 developing countries, mainly because of changes in diet.  This increase
 has prompted study by the World Health Organization and others.  The use
 of fluoride seems to be the best way to curb this rise in caries.  How-
 ever, in Third World countries water fluoridation is not always feasible,
 and fluoride may have to be provided in foods or in tablets.  Again, the
 future  seems to hold increased fluoride exposure to people and flora.

     Topical fluorides are likely to become more popular in the United
 States.  In fact, there are new fluoride-containing mouthwashes on the
market  in the United States with approximately 23 millimoles of fluoride.
Of course, topical fluoride preparations used under supervision of a den-
 tist are much more concentrated and cannot reasonably be used by the gen-
 eral public because of the danger of accidental ingestion.   However, the
preparations appear to be so highly effective that their use will become
more widespread.  It is not now clear whether or not it is  best to have a
prophylactic cleaning of the teeth prior to topical fluoride application.
The National Institute of Dental Research is currently funding work on
the question.  There is some feeling that leaving bacteria  in plaque on
teeth helps in fluoride retention.

     Fluoride usage in medicine is not extensive; however,  fluoride is
experimentally used to reduce osteoporosis.   The maximum dosage is usually
about 50 mg/day given with calcium and vitamin D.  If distributed evenly
throughout the body, this dosage would give a level of only about 0.03 mW.
One would not expect this concentration of fluoride to greatly affect  the
normal flora.  However, if fluoride is accumulated by the gut bacteria,  it
is possible that microbiologically significant levels could be attained.
Some 10% of fluoride ingested is excreted in feces.

     Microbiological aspects of fluoride ingestion by man have been
sketchily studied,  and concerns about the safety of increased ingestion
require more thorough investigations.   It has been clearly  shown that
bacteria in dental plaque accumulate rather high levels of  fluoride (mil-
limolar range).   These levels are effective in upsetting microbial phys-
iology, even to the extreme response of lysis shown by certain species of
bacteria.   The concentration of fluoride by plaque would be expected to

-------
                                   92


have effects on the population, favoring the less sensitive types.  In-
direct effects would also be expected.  For example, fluoride reduces acid
production by plaque, and less acid conditions should favor growth and
metabolism of the less aciduric members of the flora.  Reductions in acid
production due to fluoride ingestion could have effects in other parts of
the body, for example, in the vagina where the maintenance of acid condi-
tions through bacterial metabolism is thought to be partly responsible
for resistance to certain infections.

     There is a possibility that the now long-term use of fluoride in
drinking water has contributed to a rise in resistant bacteria, much as
the use of antibiotics has led to a disasterous selection of resistant
bacteria.  There is a need to find out if the use of fluoride does indeed
result in selection of resistant forms, and if the selection occurs in
the normal flora of man.

     Another possible effect of fluoride on normal flora that is being
investigated deals with the natural immune systems in the mouth — specif-
ically lysozyme, lactoperoxidase, and lactoferrin.  It appears that bac-
teria grown in media with plaque levels of fluoride are more susceptible
to lysozyme killing or inactivation by the lactoperoxidase system than
are bacteria from nonfluoridated media.  Fluoride may adversely affect
bacteria indirectly by rendering them more susceptible to normal host
defense mechanisms.  An interest in this research comes from the desire
to formulate more effective anticaries regimens.

     The National Institute of Dental Research has a number of contracts
to assess the interactions of fluoride with other ions and their effects
on dental caries.  There is also a need for research on interactions of
fluoride with other agents used to reduce caries (e.g., chlorhexidine,
calcium phosphate rinses, and alkylamines).

3.4.1.2  Basic Studies of Microbial Responses to Fluoride — The National
Institute of Dental Research has tried to obtain basic information on the
mechanism of the anticaries action of fluoride.  A large component of the
needed information is microbial responses to fluoride.  Recent research
has shown that bacteria have a complex array of responses to fluoride.

     Enolase-action inhibition is the most widely accepted view of how
fluoride inhibits bacterial acid production.  This inhibition results in
diminished supplies of phosphoenolypyruvate and secondary inhibition of
the phosphotransferase sytem for sugar uptake.  However, it appears that
fluoride may also act as a transmembrane proton conductor to acidify
cytoplasm and render cells acid sensitive.  The importance of the latter
action in the inhibition of the metabolism of oral bacteria remains to
be determined.

     There are indications that fluoride is effective in either inhibiting
or changing the production of extracellular polysaccharides by oral bac-
teria.  Since the polymers are thought to play important roles in coloniza-
tion of teeth by bacteria, this action may be involved in the anticaries
effects of fluoride.

-------
                                   93


     The uptake of fluoride by bacteria, especially in relation to fluoride
concentration by dental plaque, is not completely understood.  It is not
known if specific transport systems bring fluoride into the cell or if
fluoride enters only by diffusion of the hydrogen fluoride form.  Research-
ers do not know if the bacterial membrane has a low level of permeability
to the anionic form or what polymers are responsible for binding fluoride
in the cell.  There is still a question of whether this tightly bound fluo-
ride is of any metabolic significance.

     Fluoride has a number of other important actions that may be pertinent
to its effects on plaque bacteria.  For example, it inhibits the membrane
ATPase of streptococci, and presumably other bacteria.  Perhaps this inhi-
bition causes sufficient loss of potassium from cells so that processes
such as glycolysis and protein synthesis are inhibited.  There may be other
metabolic actions of fluoride not currently known.  Certainly, many iso-
lated enzymes are inhibited by fluoride, and a multiplicity of actions are
expected within the cell.  Also, some enzymes (e.g., adenylate synthetase)
can be stimulated by fluoride.  Again,  important metabolic alterations
result.

     Another area likely to receive a great deal of attention is related
to the anticaries action of topical fluorides.  There is evidence to sug-
gest that the action may be different from the anticaries action of fluo-
ride in drinking water.  It is clear that fluoride, especially in concen-
trated solutions, can kill certain bacteria.  However, the mechanism of
this killing and how the killing alters plaque flora are not known.

     Major research during the next decade on the biological actions of
fluoride will probably have a dental orientation.  However, there are many
industrial and environmental problems that should receive attention, some
relating to the use of fluoride as an anticaries agent.  For example, water
used for microbial processes (e.g., brewing or sewage treatment) is fluo-
ridated in many cases, and fluoride may be concentrated by the organisms
with resulting alterations in metabolism.  The major industrial problem
probably comes from emission of fluorides from industrial plants with
resultant pollution of surrounding areas.  The major sector of the biolog-
ical community interacting with these fluorides would be microorganisms.
These microorganisms would metabolize the compounds, and to date there is
little information on the specifics of this process.


3.4.2  Organic Fluorocompounds

3.4.2.1  New Compounds — One major area of future research in the micro-
biological aspects of organic fluorides is the development of antimicrobial
agents.  The most useful compounds should be selectively toxic to micro-
organisms.  Microbial resistance to antibiotics is increasing at an alarm-
ing rate, and there is an imminent need for compounds that can be used in
place of, or in conjunction with, antibiotics.  For example, fluorocytosine
is commonly used with amphotericin B in treating fungal infections caused
by organisms such as C-pyptoQooaus neoformans.  Recently, a new fluoroderiv-
ative, flumequine, was introduced as a substitute for nalidixic acid in the
treatment of urinary tract infections.

-------
                                   94


     Because of its size, fluoride is a good substitute for hydrogen in
organic compounds, and fluoroanalogues are commonly active biologically.
For example, many fluoroamino acids are incorporated into proteins in
place of the natural compounds.  It seems that a rational approach would
be to synthesize fluoroderivatives of metabolites peculiar, or nearly so,
to prokaryotes.  For example, peptidoglycan is a compound that occurs only
in the bacterial cell wall.  Many peptidoglycans contain the unusual amino
acid diaminopimelate.  Perhaps a fluoroderivative of diaminopimelate would
have selective toxicity for prokaryotes.  Nearly all peptidoglycans con-
tain D-amino acids; for example, fluorinated D-alanyl-D-alanine might be
selectively toxic.  Certainly, it seems that imaginative research in this
area is likely to be profitable.  Development of antiviral properties and
further testing of compounds is likely to yield positive results.

     Much research is still to be done in developing fluoroderivatives for
use in basic biochemical studies.  Again, fluoride tends to mimic hydrogen
as a substituent, and fluoroanalogues tend to be active biologically.  Flu-
oride is currently a popular substituent because of the possibility of
analyzing 19F nmr signals.  This field too seems to be one in which imag-
inative research is bound to be successful.

3.4.2.2  Microorganisms for Degradation of Fluoroorganics — Microorganisms
are able to catabolize many fluoroorganic compounds, sometimes resulting
in cleavage of the carbon-fluoride bond.  These organisms should be useful
in cases of dangerous pollution by organic fluoride compounds.  Moreover,
organisms capable of degrading fluoroorganics would be of interest to bio-
chemists studying reaction mechanisms and to tnicrobiologists.  Specific
microbes could be isolated for use in specific pollution problems involv-
ing organic fluorides.

3.4.2.3  Additional Uses for Fluorinated Anesthetics — Recent evidence
suggests that anesthetics, including fluorinated ones, can inhibit the
growth of cells.  The spectrum of inhibition spans all cell types, from
bacteria to mammalian cells.  Microorganisms should prove to be useful
for basic studies of the mechanisms of growth inhibition, although it is
unlikely that fluorinated anesthetics will find use as antiseptics or
disinfectants.

-------
                                  95


                               SECTION 3

                              REFERENCES
 1.  All, D. A., A.  G.  Callely,  and M.  Hayes.   1962.   Ability of a Vibrio
     Grown on Benzoate  to Oxidize pora-Fluorobenzoate.   Nature (London)
     196(4850):194-195.

 2.  Allison, A. C., G. H. Hulands, J.  F.  Nunn,  J.  A.  Kitching,  and A.  C.
     Macdonald.   1970.   The Effect of Inhalation Anaesthetics on the
     Microtubular System in Actinosphaerium nucleofi'licm.  J.  Cell Sci.
     7:483-499.

 3.  Andres, C.  J.,  J.  C. Shaeffer, and A. S.  Windeler, Jr.   1974.  Com-
     parison of  Antibacterial Properties of Stannous  Fluoride and Sodium
     Fluoride Mouthwashes.  J. Dent. Res.  53:457-460.

 4.  Becker, C.  D.,  and T. 0. Thatcher.  1973.   Toxicity of  Power Plant
     Chemicals to Aquatic Life.   WASH-1249, Battelle  Pacific Northwest
     Laboratories, Richland, Wash.  pp. R.1-R.9.

 5.  Birkeland,  J. M.,  and G. Rolla.  1972.  In-Vitro Affinity of Fluoride
     to Proteins, Dextrans, Bacteria and Salivary Components.  Arch. Oral
     Biol. 17:455-463.

 6.  Bowman, W.  H.,  and M. F. Mallette.  1966.   Catabolism of p-Fluoro-
     phenylalanine by Escherichia coli.  Arch.  Biochem. Biophys. 117:
     563-572.

 7.  Bowman, W.  H.,  I.  S. Palmer, C. 0. Clagett, and  M. F. Mallette.
     1964.  Effects of  p-Fluorophenylalanine on Lactose-Induced 3~
     Galactosidase Synthesis in  Resting-Cell Suspensions of  Esoheviohia
     eoli.  Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 108:314-322.

 8.  Brandon, R., B. G. Malmstrbm, and  T.  VSnngard.  1973.  The Effect
     of Fluoride on the Spectral and Catalytic Properties of Three
     Copper-Containing  Oxidases.  Eur.  J.  Biochem.  36:195-200.

 9.  Browne, D.  T.,  G.  L. Kenyon, and G. D. Hegeman.   1970.   Incorpora-
     tion of Monofluorotryptophans into Protein During the Growth of
     Esoheviohia aoli,.   Biochem. Biophys.  Res.  Commun.  39(1): 13-19.

10.  Bruce, D.,  and R.  Christiansen. 1965. Morphologic Changes in the
     Giant Amoeba Chaos chaos Induced by Halothane and Ether.  Exp.
     Cell. Res.  40:544-553.'

11.  Cain, R. B., E. K. Tranter, and J, A. Darrah.  1968. The Utiliza-
     tion of Some Halogenated Aromatic  Acids by Nooardia. Biochem. J.
     106:211-227.

-------
                                  96
12.  Clough, D. W., B. L. Wigdahl, and J. R. Parkhurst.   1978.   Biolog-
     ical Effects of 5-Carboxy-2'-deoxyuridine:  Hydrolysis Product of
     5-Trifluoro-2'-deoxyuridine.  Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 14:
     126-131.

13.  Cohen, S. S., J. G. Flaks, H. D. Earner, M.  R.  Loeb, and J.
     Lichtenstein.  1958.  The Mode of Action of  5-Fluorouracil and
     Its Derivatives.  Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA  44:1004-1012.

14.  Comeau, G., and F. LeBlanc.  1972.  Influence du fluor sur le
     Fimaria Tiygvametvica et 1' Hypogymnia physodes (Influence of Fluo-
     rine on Funaria hygvometrica and Hypogymnia  physodee).  Can. J.
     Bot. 50:847-856.

15.  Danenberg, P. V., and K. D. Danenberg.   1978.  Effect of 5,10 Meth-
     ylenetetrahydrofolate on the Dissociation of 5-Fluoro-2'-deoxyuridy-
     late from Thymidylate Synthetase:  Evidence  for an  Ordered Mechanism.
     Biochemistry 17:4018-4024.

16.  Dunn, T. F., and F. R. Leach.  1967.  Incorporation of p-Fluoro-
     phenylalanine into Protein by a Cell-Free System.   J. Biol. Chem.
     242(11):2693-2699.

17.  Eagers, R. Y.  1969.  Toxic Properties of Inorganic Fluorine Com-
     pounds.  Elsevier Publishing Co.  New York.   pp. 106-139.

18.  Ericsson, Y., ed.  1978.  Progress in Caries Prevention.  Caries
     Res. 12(Suppl. 1):1-112.

19.  Fowden, L.  1972.  Fluoroamino Acids and Protein Synthesis.  In:
     Carbon-Fluorine Compounds:  Chemistry,  Biochemistry and Biological
     Activities.  Elsevier, Excerpta Medica, and  North-Holland, Associ-
     ated Scientific Publishers, Amsterdam,  London,  and  New York.  pp.
     141-159.

20.  Frostell, G., and Y. Ericsson.  1978.  Anti-plaque  Therapeutics in
     Caries Prevention.  Caries Res. 12(Suppl. 1):74-82.

21.  Gallon, J. R., M. I. Ul-Haque, and A. E. Chaplin.   1978.  Fluoro-
     acetate Metabolism in Gloeoaapea sp. LB795 and Its  Relationship to
     Acetylene Reduction (Nitrogen Fixation).  J. Gen. Microbiol. 106:
     329-336.

22.  Gilbert, 0. L.  1973.  The Effect of Airborne Fluorides.  In:  Air
     Pollution and Lichens, B. W. Ferry, M.  S. Baddeley, and D. L.
     Hackworth, eds.  Athlone Press, University of London,  pp. 176-191.

23.  Goldberg, A. L.  1971.  Effects of Protease  Inhibitors on Protein
     Breakdown and Enzyme Induction in Starving Eschevichia ooli.  Nature
     (London) New Biol. 234:51-52.

-------
                                 97


24.  Goldman, P.  1965.  The Enzymatic Cleavage of the Carbon-Fluorine
     Bond in Fluoroacetate.   J. Biol.  Chem.  240(8):3434-3438.

25.  Goldman, P.  1972.  The Use of Microorganisms in the Study of Fluo-
     rinated Compounds.  In:  Carbon-Fluorine Compounds:   Chemistry,
     Biochemistry and Biological Activities.   Elsevier, Excerpta Medica,
     and North-Holland, Associated  Scientific Publishers, Amsterdam,
     London, and New York.   pp. 335-356.

26.  Goldman, P., G.W.A. Milne, and M. T.  Pignataro.   1967.   Fluorine
     Containing Metabolites  Formed  from 2-Fluorobenzoic Acid by Paeudo-
     monas Species.   Arch. Biochem. Biophys.  118:178-184.

27.  Greenwood, D.  1978. Activity of Flumequine Against Esoheriohia
     coti:  In Vitro Comparison with Nalidixic and Oxolinic  Acids.
     Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.  13:479-483.

28.  Gutz, H.  1966.  Induction of  Mitotic Segregation with  p-Fluoro-
     phenylalanine in Schizosaccharomyces  porribe.  J.  Bacteriol. 92(5):
     1567-1568.

29.  Haguenauer, R., and A.  Kepes.   1972.   NaF Inhibition of Phosphory-
     lation and Dephosphorylation Involved in a-Methyl-D-glucoside
     Transport in E. coti K  12:  A  pH  Dependent Phenomenon Sensitive to
     Uncoupling Agents.  Biochimie  54:505-512.

30.  Halsey, M. J.,  and E. B. Smith.   1970.   Effects  of Anaesthetics on
     Luminous Bacteria.  Nature (London)  227:1363-1365.

31.  Hamilton, I. R.  1977.   Effects of Fluoride on Enzymatic Regulation
     of Bacterial Carbohydrate Metabolism.  Caries Res. ll(Suppl.  1):
     262-278.

32.  Hamilton, I. R., and D. C. Ellwood.   1978.  Effects  of  Fluoride on
     Carbohydrate Metabolism by Washed Cells  of Streptococcus  rmtans
     Grown at Various pH Values in  a Chemostat.  Infect.  Iiranun. 19:
     434-442.

33.  Hardwick, J. L., and S. A. Leach.  1963.   Advances in Fluorine
     Research and Dental Caries Prevention.   Pergamon Press, Oxford.
     pp. 151-158.

34.  Hardwick, W. A., and J. W. Foster.  1952.   Nature of Sporogenesis
     in Some Aerobic Bacteria.  J.  Gen. Physiol. 35:907-927.

35.  Hardy, C., and  S. B. Binkley.   1967.   The Effect of  p-Fluorophenyl-
     alanine on Nucleic Acid Biosynthesis  and Cell Division  in Eacherichia
     coli.  Biochemistry 6(7):1892-1898.

36.  Harper, D. B.,  and E. R. Blakley.  1971.   The Metabolism of p-Fluoro-
     phenylacetic Acid by a  Pseudomonae sp.:   I.  Isolation  and Identifi-
     cation of Intermediates in Degradation.   Can. J. Microbiol. 17:
     635-644.

-------
                                  98


37.  Hassall, K. A.  1967.  Inhibition of Respiration of Chlovella vul-
     garis by Simultaneous Application of Cupric and Fluoride Ions.
     Nature (London) 215:521.

38.  Hawksworth, D. L.  1971.  Lichens as Litmus for Air Pollution:   A
     Historical Review.  Int. J. Environ. Stud. 1:281-296.

39.  Heidelberger, C.  1972.  The Nucleotides of Fluorinated Pyrimidines
     and Their Biological Activities.  In:  Carbon-Fluorine Compounds:
     Chemistry, Biochemistry and Biological Activities.   Elsevier,
     Excerpta Medica, and North-Holland, Associated Scientific Publishers,
     Amsterdam, London, and New York.  pp. 125-140.

40.  Hellung-Larsen, P., and H. Klenow.  1969.   On the Mechanism of  Inhi-
     bition by Fluoride Ions of the DNA Polymerase Reaction.  Biochim.
     Biophys. Acta 190:434-441.

41.  Herbison, R. J., and S. L. Handelman.  1975.  Effect of Trace Ele-
     ments on Dissolution of Hydroxyapatite by Cariogenic Streptococci.
     J. Dent. Res. 54(6):1107-1114.

42.  Howard, A., and D. G. Lundgren.  1970.  Inorganic Pyrophosphatase
     f rom Ferrobaaillus fewooxidans (Thiobadllus ferrooxidans).  Can.
     J. Biochem. 48:1302-1307.

43.  Irving, G.C.J., and D. J. Cosgrove.  1971.  Inositol Phosphate
     Phosphatases of Microbiological Origin:  Some Properties of a Par-
     tially Purified Bacterial (Pseudomonas sp.) Phytase.  Aust. J.  Biol.
     Sci. 24:547-557.

44.  Jenkins, G. N.  1970.  Mechanism of Effects in the Mouth.  In:
     Fluorides and Human Health.  World Health Organization, Geneva.
     pp. 201-213.

45.  Jenkins, G. N., W. M. Edgar, and D. B. Ferguson.  1969.  The Dis-
     tribution and Metabolic Effects of Human Plaque Fluorine.  Arch.
     Oral Biol. 14:105-119.

46.  Johnston, A.W.B.  1975a.  Effects of p-Fluorophenylalanine on the
     Induction of Mutations in Bacteriophage T*:  I.  5-Bromouracil
     Mutagenesis.  Mutat. Res. 27(1):7-16.

47.  Johnston, A.W.B.  1975&.  Effects of p-Fluorophenylalanine on the
     Induction of Mutations in Bacteriophage T*:  II.  Nitrous Acid
     Mutagenesis.  Mutat. Res. 27(1):17-26.

48.  Kaiser, I. I.  1969.  Studies on 5-Fluorouracil-Containing Ribo-
     nucleic Acid:  I.  Separation and Partial Characterization of
     Fluorouracil-Containing Transfer Ribonucleic Acids from Escherickia
     aoli.  Biochemistry 8(1):231-238.

-------
                                  99


49.  Kaiser, I. I.  1971.   Structural Properties of 5-Fluorouracil-
     Containing Transfer Ribonucleic Acids from Escherichia coli.
     Biochemistry 10(9):1540-1545.

50.  Kanapka, J. A., and I. R. Hamilton.   1971.   Fluoride Inhibition of
     Enolase Activity In Vivo and Its Relationship to the Inhibition of
     Glucose-6-P Formation in Streptococcus salivarius.   Arch.  Biochem.
     Biophys. 146:167-174.

51.  Kanapka, J. A., R. L. Khandelwal, and I.  R. Hamilton.   1971.   Fluo-
     ride Inhibition of Glucose-6-P Formation  in Streptococcus  salivarius:
     Relation to Glycogen Synthesis and Degradation.   Arch.  Biochem.
     Biophys. 144:596-602.

52.  Kashket, S., V. M. Rodriguez,  and F.  J. Bunick.   1977.   Inhibition
     of Glucose Utilization in Oral Streptococci by Low  Concentrations
     of Fluoride.  Caries Res. 11:301-307.

53.  Kay, W. W., and M. Cameron.   1978a.   Citrate Transport in  Salmonella
     typhimurium.  Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 190:270-280.

54.  Kay, W. W., and M. Cameron.   1978&.   Transport of C/,-Dicarboxylic
     Acids in Salmonella typhimurium.  Arch. Biochem. Biophys.  190:
     281-289.

55.  Kelly, M.  1965.  Isolation  of Bacteria Able to Metabolize Fluoro-
     acetate or Fluoroacetamide.   Nature (London) 208(5012):809-810.

56.  Khandelwal, R. L., and I. R. Hamilton. 1971.  Purification and
     Properties of Adenyl Cyclase from Streptococcus salivarius.  J.
     Biol. Chem. 246:3297-3304.

57.  Kirk, K., and P. Goldman.  1970.  Fluorocitric Acid:  Selective
     Microbial Degradation of the Inhibitory Isomer.   Biochem.  J.
     117:409-410.

58.  Kirkness, C. M., and A. G. Macdonald.  1972.  Interaction  Between
     Anaesthetics and Hydrostatic Pressure in  the Division of Tetrdhymena
     pyriformis W.  Exp. Cell Res.  75:329-336.

59.  Klopper, W. J., and J. Jongeling-Eijndhoven.  1971.  Accumulation
     of Fluoride by Yeast.  J. Inst. Brew. London 77(3):259-260.

60.  Knuuttila, M.L.E., and K. K. MSkinen.  1973.  The Inhibition of a
     p-Nitrophenylphosphatase of  Streptococcus mutans by Fluoride Ions.
     Acta Chem. Scand. 27 (2)": 605-612.

61.  LeBlanc, F., G. Comeau, and  D. N. Rao. 1971.  Fluoride Injury
     Symptoms in Epiphytic Lichens and Mosses.  Can.  J.  Bot.  49:1691-
     1698.

-------
                                100
62.  LeBlanc, F., and J. De Sloover.  1970.  Relation Between Industrial-
     ization and the Distribution and Growth of Epiphytic Lichens and
     Mosses in Montreal.  Can. J. Bot. 48:1485-1496.

63.  LeBlanc, F., D. N. Rao, and G. Comeau.  1972.  Indices of Atmos-
     pheric Purity and Fluoride Pollution Pattern in Arvida, Quebec.
     Can. J. Bot. 50:991-998.

64.  Lehman, I. R., M. J. Bessman, E. S. Simms, and A. Koraberg.   1958.
     Enzymatic Synthesis of Deoxyribonucleic Acid:  I.  Preparation of
     Substrates and Partial Purification of an Enzyme from Esohevichia
     coli.  J. Biol. Chem. 233:163-170.

65.  Leigh ton, T. J., and J. J. Stock.  1970.  Biochemical Changes During
     Fungal Sporulation and Spore Germination:  I.  Phenyl Methyl Sulfonyl
     Fluoride Inhibition of Macroconidial Germination in Miorosporum
     gypseum.  J. Bacteriol. 101 (3): 931-940.

66.  Lesher, R. J., G. R. Bender, and R. E. Marquis.   1977.  Bacteriolytic
     Action of Fluoride Ions.  Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 12:339-345.
67.  Leslie, R. , and D. G. Parbery.  1972.  Growth of V&rticill'iwn
     on Medium Containing Sodium Fluoride.  Trans. Br. Mycol. Soc. 58(2):
     351-352.

68.  Lhoas, P.  1961.  Mitotic Haploidization by Treatment of Aspergillus
     niger Diploids with pora-Fluorophenylalanine.  Nature (London)
     190:744.

69.  Loesche, W. J., S. A. Syed, R. J. Murray, and J. R. Mellberg.  1975.
     Effect of Topical Acidulated Phosphate Fluoride on Percentage of
     Streptococcus mutans and Streptococcus sanguis in Plaque:  II.
     Pooled Occlusal and Pooled Approximal Samples.  Caries Res. 9:
     139-155.

70.  Lowrie, R. J., and P. L. Bergquist.  1968.  Transfer Ribonucleic
     Acids from Escherichia coli Treated with 5-Fluorouracil.  Biochem-
     istry 7 (5): 1761-1770.

71.  Lukens, R. J., and J. G. Ho rs fall.  1973.  Processes of Sporulation
     in Altemaria solani- and Their Response to Metabolic Inhibitors.
     Phytopathology 63:176-182.

72.  Luoma, H.  1972a.  Potassium Content of Cariogenic Streptococci
     Influenced by pH, Fluoride, Molybdenum, and Ethanol.  Scad. J.
     Dent. Res. 80:18-25.

73.  Luoma, H.  19722?.  The Effects of Chlorhexidine and Fluoride Combi-
     nations on the Potassium, Sodium and Phosphorus Content and Acid
     Production of Cariogenic Streptococci.  Arch. Oral Biol. 17:
     1431-1437.

-------
                                 101


74.  Luoma, H.  1973.  The Effects of Propanol, Butanol, Chlorohexidine,
     Fluoride and Combinations on the Potassium and Phosphate Transloca-
     tion and Acid Production by Streptococcus wutane.  Arch. Oral Biol.
     18:1497-1507.

75.  Luoma, H., H. Ranta, and L. Turtola.  1971.  The Potassium and
     Phosphorus Content of a Cariogenic Streptococcus Modified by Fluo-
     ride and Selenium.  Caries. Res. 5:96-99.

76.  Luoma, H., and H. Tuompo.  1975.  .The Relationship Between Sugar
     Metabolism and Potassium Translocation by Caries-Inducing Strepto-
     cocci and the Inhibitory Role of Fluoride.  Arch. Oral Biol. 20:
     749-755.

77.  Mandel, H. G.  1969.  The Incorporation of 5-Fluorouracil into RNA
     and Its Molecular Consequences.  In:  Progress in Molecular and
     Subcellular Biology, Vol. 1.,  F. E. Hahn, ed.  Springer-Verlag,
     New York.  pp. 82-135.

78.  Mandelbaum-Shavit, F., and R.  L. Risliuk.  1978.  Mechanism of
     Resistance of Pediococcus cevevisiae to 5-Fluorodeoxyuridine.
     Biochim. Biophys. Acta 543:1-9.

79.  Marquis, R. E.  1970.  Fluoroamino Acids and Microorganisms.  Handb.
     Exp. Pharmacol. 20(2):166-192.

80.  Marquis, R. E.  1976.  High Pressure Microbial Physiology.  Adv.
     Microb. Physiol. 14:159-241.

81.  Marquis, R. E.  1977.  Inhibition of Streptococcal Adenosine Tri-
     phosphatase by Fluoride.  J. Dent. Res. 56:704.

82.  Middleton, J. L., E. H. Marth, and 0. Fennema.  1975.  Dichloro-
     fluoromethane Inactivates Saccharomyces cerewisiae.  Appl. Microbiol.
     29(2):195-200.

83.  MUhlemann, H. R., and J. R. Strub.  1975.  Inhibition of Plaque
     Growth with Taurolin, Vantocil, and Amine Fluoride.  Helv. Odontol.
     Acta 19:57-60.

84.  Nash, T. H., III.  1971.  Lichen Sensitivity to Hydrogen Fluoride.
     Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 98(2):103-106.

85.  Nunn, J. F., K. L. Dixon, and  J. R. Moore.  1968.  Effect of Halo-
     thane on Tetvahymena pyriformis.  Br. J. Anaesth. 40:145.

86.  O'Leary, J., F. F. Busta, and  L. L. McKay.  1975.  Glucose Trans-
     port Systems in Bacillus stearothermopkilus (abstract).  Abstr.
     Annu. Meet. Am. Soc. Microbiol.  p. 156.

87.  Oujesky, H., and I. Bhagat.  1973.  Response of Stccphylococcus
     cn&eus to Atmospheres of Freons and Genetrons.  Dev. Ind. Microbiol.
     14:229-237.

-------
                                  102


 88.  Pearce, E.I.F., and G. N. Jenkins.  1976.   The Inhibition of Acid
      Production in Human Saliva by Monofluorophosphate.   Arch. Oral
      Biol. 21:617-621.

 89.  Pearce, E.I.F., and G. N. Jenkins.  1977.   The Decomposition of
      Monofluorophosphate by Enzymes in Whole Human Saliva.   Arch. Oral
      Biol. 22:405-407.

 90.  Pine, M. J.  1978.  Comparative Physiological Effects  of Incorpor-
      ated Amino Acid Analogs in Esaheviohia Goli.  Antimicrob. Agents
      Chemother. 13(4):676-685.

 91.  Pisut, I., and E. Lisicka'-Jellnkov£.  1974.  Epiphytische Flechten
      in der umgebung Einer Aluminiumhutte in der Mittelslowakei (Epiphytic
      Lichens in the Vicinity of an Aluminum Factory in Middle Slovakia).
      Biologia (Bratislava) 29(1):29-38.

 92.  Polak, A., and H. J. Scholer.  1975.  Mode of Action of 5-Fluoro-
      cytosine and Mechanisms of Resistance.  Chemotherapy 21:113-130.

 93.  Prior, B. A., 0. Fennema, and E. H. Marth.  1970.  Effect of Gas
      Hydrate Formers on Microorganisms.  Appl.  Microbiol. 20(1):139-144.

 94.  Prior, B. A., 0. Fennema, and J. Pate.  1975.  Effect  of Dichloro-
      difluoromethane on the Appearance, Viability, and Integrity of
      Eseherichia ooH.  Appl. Microbiol. 29(5):685-691.

 95.  Rasmussen, L.  1967.  Effects of DL-p-Fluorophenylalanine on Para-
      mecium aurelia During the Cell Generation Cycle.  Exp. Cell Res.
      45:501-504.

 96.  Rasmussen, L., and E. Zeuthen.  1962.  Cell Division and Protein
      Synthesis in Tetrahymena, as Studied with p-Fluorophenylalanine.
      C. R. Trav. Lab. Carlsberg 32(21):333-358.

 97.  Reed, A. B., Jr., and G. R. Dychdala.  1964.  Microbiological
      Activity of Aerosol Propellants.  Soap Chem. Spec.  40:204, 208,
      210, 290.

 98.  Rennert, 0. M., and H. S. Anker.  1963.  On the Incorporation of
      5*,5',5'-Trifluoroleucine into Proteins of E. coli. Biochemistry
      2(3):471-476.

 99.  RSlla, G.  1977.  Effects of Fluoride on Inhibition of Plaque For-
      mation.  Caries Res. ll(Suppl. 1):243-252.

100.  Rosen, S., J. I. Frea, and S. M. Hsu.  1978.  Effect of Fluoride-
      Resistant Microorganisms on Dental Caries.  J. Dent. Res. 57:180.

101.  Sandham, H. J., and I. Kleinberg.  1973.  Effect of Fluoride on
      Carbon Dioxide and Acid Formation in Salivary Sediment Mixtures
      Incubated with Glucose.  Arch. Oral Biol.  18:211-225.

-------
                                  103
102.  Sargent, D. F., and C.P.S. Taylor.   1972.  The Effect of Cupric
      and Fluoride Ions on the Respiration of Chlovella.  Can. J. Bot.
      50:905-907.

103.  Schachtele, C. F.  1977.  Discussion by C.  F.  Schachtele.  Caries
      Res. ll(Suppl. 1):278-287.

104.  Schachtele, C. F., and J. A. Mayo.   1973.  Phosphoenolpyruvate-
      Dependent Glucose Transport in Oral Streptococci.   J. Dent. Res.
      52:1209-1215.

105.  Schmidt, L. S., H.-C. Yen, and H.  Gest.  1974.  Bioenergetic
      Aspects of Bacteriophage Replication in the Photosynthetic Bac-
      terium Rhodopseudomonae capsulata.   Arch. Biochem. Biophys.
      165(1):229-239.

106.  Serrano, R., and R. E. Reeves.  1974.  Glucose Transport in Enta-
      moeba hietolytiaa.  Biochem. J. 144:43-48.

107.  Stretton, R. J., W. R. Gretton, and J. Watson-Walker.  1971.  The
      Effects of Halocarbon Aerosol Propellents on Bacteria.  J. Appl.
      Bacteriol. 34(4):773-777.

108.  Taylor, N. F.  1972.  The Metabolism and Enzymology of Fluorocarbo-
      hydrates and Related Compounds.  In:  Carbon-Fluorine Compounds:
      Chemistry, Biochemistry and Biological Activities.  Elsevier,
      Excerpta Medica, and North-Holland, Associated Scientific Publishers,
      Amsterdam, London, and New York.  pp. 215-238.

109.  Taylor, N. F., L. Hill, and R. Eisenthal.  1975.  The Specificity
      of Oxidase and Kinase Preparations from Pseudomonas fluoreBcens
      Towards Deoxyfluoromonosaccharides.  Can. J. Biochem. 53(1):57-64.

110.  Taylor, N. F., F. H. White, and R.  Eisenthal.   1972.  Oxidation of
      3-Deoxy-3-fluoro-D-glucose by Cell-Free Extracts of Pseudamonas
      fluorescens.  Biochem. Pharmacol.  21:347-353.

111.  Thakur, J., and R. Dayal.  1971.  Studies in Aquatic Fungi of
      Varanasi:  VIII.  Effects of Certain Substances upon the Respira-
      tion .  Indian Phytopathol. 24(3):462-470.

112.  Timberlake, W. E., and G. Turian.   1975. Conidiation of Neurospora
      arassa Induced by Treatment with Natrium Fluoride in Submerged Cul-
      ture.  Arch. Microbiol. 104:151-154.

113.  Tinanoff, N., J. M. Brady, and A.  Gross. 1976.  The Effect of NaF
      and SnF2 Mouthrinses on Bacterial Colonization of Tooth Enamel:  TEM
      and SEM Studies.  Caries Res. 10:415-426.

114.  Treshow, M.  1965.  Response of Some Pathogenic Fungi to Sodium
      Fluoride.  Mycologia 57:216-221.

-------
                                  104
115.  Treshow, M., G. Dean, and F. M. Harner.  1967.  Stimulation of
      Tobacco Mosaic Virus-Induced Lesions on Bean by Fluoride.   Phyto-
      pathology 57:756-758.

116.  Umeda, M., and C. Heidelberger.  1969.  Fluorinated Pyrimidines:
      XXXI.  Mechanisms of Inhibition of Vaccinia Virus Replication in
      HeLa Cells by Pyrimidine Nucleosides.  Proc. Soc. Exp.  Biol. Med.
      130:24-29.

117.  Venkateswarlu, P.  1970.  Effects on Body-Fluids and Soft  Tissues.
      In:  Fluorides and Human Health.  World Health Organization, Geneva.
      pp. 163-184.

118.  Vennesland, B., and E. 0. Turkington.  1966a.  Effect of Fluoride
      on the Quinone-Hill Reaction with Blue-Green Algae (abstract). Fed.
      Proc. Fed. Am. Soc. Exp. Biol. 25:226.

119.  Vennesland, B., and E. 0. Turkington.  1966i.  The Relationship of
      the Hill Reaction to Photosynthesis:  Studies with Fluoride-Poisoned
      Blue-Green Algae.  Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 116:153-161.

120.  Viriyanondha, P., and R. M. Baxter.  1970.  Incorporation of Fluoro-
      acetate into Uridine Nucleotides of Staphyloooeaus aureuB.  Biochim.
      Biophys. Acta 201:495-496.

121.  Warburg, 0.  1962.  New Methods of Cell Physiology:  Applied to
      Cancer, Photosynthesis, and Mechanism of X-Ray Action.   John Wiley
      and Sons, Interscience Publishers, New York.  641 pp.

122.  Warburg, 0., and W. Christian.  1942.  Isolierung und Kristallisation
      des Garungsferments Enolase (Isolation and Crystallization of the
      Fementing Agent Enolase).  Biochem. Z. 310:384-421.

123.  Weiss, S., W. J. King, R. C. Kestenbaum, and J. J. Donohue.  1965.
      Influence of Various Factors on Polysaccharide Synthesis in S. mitis.
      Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 131:839-850.

124.  White, F. H., and N. F. Taylor.  1970.  Metabolism of 3-Deoxy-3-
      fluoro-D-glucose by Paeudomonae fluoreseens.  FEBS Lett. 11(4):
      268-272.

125.  Williams, R.A.D.  1964.  Biochemical Aspect of the Adaptation to
      Fluoride by a Microorganism Isolated from Dental Plaque (abstract).
      J. Dent. Res. 43(5):946-947.

126.  Williams, R.A.D.  1967.  The Growth of Lancefield Group D Strepto-
      cocci in the Presence of Sodium Fluoride.  Arch. Oral Biol. 12:
      109-117.

-------
                                  105
127.  Williams, R.A.D.  1968.  Permeability of Fluoride-Trained Strepto-
      cocci to Fluoride.  Arch. Oral Biol. 13:1031-1033.

128.  Yost, K. G., and P. J. VanDemark.   1978.  Growth Inhibition of
      Streptococcus mutans and Leuconoetoc mee&ntevoides by Sodium Fluo-
      ride and Ionic Tin.  Appl. Environ. Microbiol.  35:920-924.

-------
                                SECTION 4

                      BIOLOGICAL ASPECTS IN PLANTS
     Fluoride is a well-studied pollutant in the ecosystem, and consider-
able data exist on its effects on plant systems.  For some of the earlier
work in the field, several good literature reviews may be consulted (Adams,
1956; Brewer, 1966; Chang, 1975; National Academy of Sciences, 1971; Thomas
and Alther, 1966; Treshow and Pack, 1970).

4.1  SUMMARY

     The metabolism and effects of fluorides in plants have been well stud-
ied, but important information is still lacking.  Although soils contain a
high fluoride content (10 to 1000 ppm) , most is in a form not absorbed by
plants.  Acid soils tend to have a higher available fluoride content; lim-
ing decreases this availability.  The levels of major nutrients in the soil
affect the amount of fluoride absorbed through the root.  Fluoride is trans-
located from root to shoot, and fluoride in the leaf moves to the tips and
edges of the leaves but not out of the leaves.

     In polluted areas, most fluoride is probably absorbed by leaves.
Leaves of plants found in the vicinity of known sources of atmospheric
fluoride pollution, such as aluminum and phosphate fertilizer industries,
have high fluoride concentrations.  Fluoride fumigation at night, when
stomates are closed, produces less accumulation of fluoride in tissues
than fumigation during the day.  Little downward translocation of fluoride
from shoots to roots has been found.  Gaseous fluorides are more effec-
tively absorbed than particulate fluorides and lead to greater injury.
Cryolite, even when present at high levels, produces few injury symptoms
in plants.

     Fluoride metabolism in plants is not well understood.  Some plants
have the ability to synthesize relatively large quantities of carbon-
fluorine compounds.  These plants are toxic to animals, and the toxic
principle is usually monofluoroacetate.  Whether all plants can synthe-
size carbon-fluorine bonds is uncertain.  There is some evidence that a
variety of plants can form small amounts of fluoroacetate and fluoroci-
trate.  No information is available on the enzyme system(s) necessary to
synthesize or degrade the organofluorides.  Why fluoroacetate is not
toxic to these plants is not known.

     Fluoride is found in virtually all plants.  In unpolluted areas,
fluoride concentrations range from about 2 to 20 ppm.  Except for certain
species (e.g., Camellia), plants are not able to concentrate fluoride much
above these levels from the soil.  There is no apparent relationship be-
tween soil concentration of fluoride and tissue concentration of fluoride.
However, exposure to even low concentrations of atmospheric fluoride can
lead to significant accumulation of foliage.  Significant amounts of fluo-
ride can be removed from leaves by washing with distilled water or deter-
gents.  Tissue fluorides increase as length of exposure and atmospheric


                                   106

-------
                                   107
concentrations increase.  Data are inadequate to determine subcellular
sites of localization; however, some evidence suggests that chloroplasts
accumulate fluoride to a greater extent than mitochondria or cell walls.

     Fluoride is eliminated from plants by loss of leaves, twigs, and
roots; by rain; and, although evidence for this is meager, perhaps
through volatilization of organofluorides.

     Fluorides affect cells in an undefined manner.  Eventually, the
altered metabolism of the cell is expressed as visible symptoms, which
ultimately can cause death of the plant or plant organ.  The buildup of
fluorides in plant material increases the availability of fluoride to
other components of the ecosystem, which may, for example, increase the
incidence of fluorosis in animals.

     Although fluorides are known to be in vitro inhibitors of a variety
of enzymes, it is difficult to establish whether inhibition of these
enzymes also occurs in vivo and which inhibition is directly responsible
for the altered metabolism.  It is known, however, that fluorides alter
photosynthesis, carbohydrate metabolism, respiratory and oxidative proc-
esses, RNA metabolism, and calcium nutrition.

     Fluoride injury to foliage usually involves tip or marginal necrosis,
sometimes preceded by chlorosis; however, other environmental stresses
can duplicate these symptoms.  Wilting is observed with higher doses of
fluorides.  Not all plants are equally sensitive to fluorides; gladiolus,
apricot, and Douglas fir are examples of sensitive plants, whereas cherry,
tomato, and wheat are resistant plants.  Fruits can also be injured by
fluoride exposure.  The most common example of injury is the soft suture
disease in peaches; fruit yield can be decreased by fluoride exposure.
High fluoride concentrations in solutions can inhibit germination of seeds
and restrict growth, although at low concentrations some enhancement of
linear growth may occur.  Growth inhibition is usually accompanied by vis-
ible injury symptoms, but hidden injury (growth inhibition without visible
injury) has been reported when plants were exposed to relatively high
concentrations of fluoride.

     From an agricultural point of view, permissible fluoride exposures
are difficult to determine.  Interacting factors include the species
diversity of the community, the sensitivity of each species, and the
nature and pattern of fluoride exposure.  Data are insufficient to rec-
ommend air quality concentrations at the present time.  Few data also
exist on the effects of interactions of fluoride with other pollutants
or with parasitic organisms.

     Fluorides apparently can be mutagenic; cytological abnormalities
have been observed in a variety of plants exposed to either hydrogen
fluoride or sodium fluoride.

-------
                                  108


4.2  METABOLISM

     Fluorine, a rather abundant element, occurs naturally in all soils.
It is released to the environment by a number of industrial processes.
Fluoride contamination of plants has been extensively investigated because
exposure to fluorides can induce disease.  Although greater emphasis has
been placed on symptomatology, there is considerable information concern-
ing the metabolism of fluoride in plants.  However, information gaps do
exist, particularly with respect to the fate and effect(s) of fluoride
at the cellular and molecular level.

     Based on the generally accepted criteria of Arnon and Stout (1939),
fluoride is not considered essential for plant nutrition.  Although some
reports show that in certain plants (Douglas fir, citrus, rose, alfalfa,
and beans) fluoride can stimulate growth, this increased growth rate does
not normally result in a better adapted plant (Thomas and Alther, 1966).

4.2.1  Uptake and Absorption

     Because fluoride can be absorbed by most plant organs, the major
route of entry depends on the source of fluoride.  For example, atmos-
pheric pollution from aluminum and phosphate industries is the major
source of fluoride for many plants, entry occurring through stems and
leaves.  Soils, however, contain considerable amounts of fluoride, and
absorption from soil occurs if the fluoride is in an available state.
No information was found on the uptake mechanism for any cell type.

4.2.1.1  Exposure to Fluoride in Soil — Most soils contain from 10 to
1000 ppm fluoride.  In alkaline soils, much of this is bound in clays,
but in acid soils some fluoride is soluble and can be absorbed by the
plant.

     Sand and water culture experiments with added sodium fluoride show
that plant roots will absorb fluoride, the amount absorbed depending on
external concentration and exposure time.  For example, after addition
of isotopically labeled sodium fluoride to soil, fluorine-18 was detected
in roots, stems, and leaves of tomato plants (Lyoapereican eaaul&ntum),
indicating both absorption and translocation (Ledbetter, Mavrodineanu,
and Weiss, 1960).  Furthermore, uptake of fluoride by whole grass seed-
lings grown in water containing 5.25 to 21.00 mM fluoride increased from
28 to 51 ppm (wet weight) after 1-hr exposure, from 30 to 62 ppm after
4-hr exposure, and from 58 to 282 ppm after 16-hr exposure (Peters and
Shorthouse, 1964).  Plants grown in 1.05 mW fluoride contained only 3.4
ppm after a 4-hr exposure.

     Acacia geovginae grown in water culture and then exposed for 18 hr
to an aqueous solution containing 10 ppm fluoride accumulated 3.6 ppm
inorganic fluoride (wet-weight basis) in the aerial parts and 10.3 ppm
in the roots (Peters, Murray, and Shorthouse, 1965).  When exposed to
20 ppm fluoride for 120 hr, the Inorganic fluoride in the aerial parts
increased from 1.2 to 5.5 ppm, and the root content increased from 1.4
to 16.2 ppm.  With higher concentrations of fluoride in the growth solu-
tion (200 to 300 ppm) , large amounts of fluoride were taken up (Figure

-------
                                   109
4.1).  Considerable variation among plants was  observed in these experi-
ments.  For example, four plants grown in water culture and exposed to 10
ppm fluoride for eight days contained from 10 to 25.2 ppm fluoride.  In
pot experiments where fluoride was supplied  as  a saturated solution of
calcium fluoride for 54 days, the aerial portions contained from 0 to 82
ppm inorganic fluoride.
                                            ORNL-DWG 77-2427)
                 PH
                6.6
                                               T
         A  AERIAL PARTS
         R  ROOTS
         •  INORGANIC FLUORIDE
         O  ORGANIC FLUORIDE
                 4.0
                     • A
                               J_
                                    _L
                 _L
J_
                                                     I
800
                              4600  2400
                                 FLUORIDE
                                         3200  4000  4BOO
     Figure 4.1.  Comparison of  the amounts  of  fluoride taken up by Acacia
geovginae from solutions of sodium fluoride,  300 pg/ml (15.75 mW) at pH 6.6
and pH 4.0 (acidification with nitric acid).  Experiment 3 was also exposed
to dipotassium hydrogen phosphate.  Source:   Adapted from Peters, Murray,
and Shorthouse, 1965, Figure 2,  p. 727.  Reprinted  by permission of the
publisher.
     Liming soil decreases the available fluoride  content.   Studies by
Maclntire et al. (1949) showed that tops of plants do  not  accumulate fluo-
ride from soils amended with calcium fluoride,  rock phosphate,  or hydro-
gen fluoride when the soils were adequately limed.   In further  studies,
Maclntire et al. (1951) increased the fluoride  content of  clover by adding
hydrofluoric acid to Hartsells-fine sandy  loam  and Clarksville  silt loam.
Treating the soil with lime reduced the fluoride content of clover to con-
trol values (about 20 ppm).  Similarly, Hansen, Wiebe, and Thome (1958)
reported that sodium fluoride additions to soil increased  the plant-
fluoride content of turnips and alfalfa grown in Orem  loamy soil (low
lime, low clay, and low organic content) to a much greater extent than
those grown in soils higher in lime or clay.  Additions of sodium fluoro-
silicate produced similar results, although less fluoride  was absorbed

-------
                                   110


than with sodium fluoride additions.  In other studies, increasing the
pH of loam and sandy loam soils supplemented with fluoride from 4.5 to
6.5 decreased the amount of fluoride  in the leaves of tomato and buck-
wheat (Prince et al., 1949).  Similar percentage decreases in leaf fluo-
ride concentration were observed with either hydrogen fluoride or sodium
fluoride added to Sassafrass loam or  to sandy loam soils.  Hurd-Karrer
(1950) found that liming decreased the uptake of fluoride in collards,
buckwheat, and barley.  In unlimed plots with added sodium fluoride,
uptake was greater from loamy sand soils than from sandy loam soils.

     Because soil fluoride may be unavailable to plants, a direct relation-
ship between soil fluoride content and plant fluoride content does not
necessarily exist.  However, Israel (1974a) found a positive statistical
correlation between soil fluoride content and alfalfa fluoride content.
Under his experimental conditions, a  soil concentration of 120 ppm fluo-
ride was necessary to produce the same tissue level of fluoride (1 ppm)
as is produced by exposure to only 0.007 yg/m3 of hydrogen fluoride.  These
data illustrate the difficulty of trying to correlate tissue fluoride con-
tent with soil fluoride content in field studies where small, but measur-
able, atmospheric concentrations of fluoride may be present.  These data
also support the argument that airborne fluorides do not add enough fluo-
ride to soils to increase plant uptake from the soil.

     In a German industrial area, yearly additions to soil by fallout
from the atmosphere were approximately 2.1 kg of fluoride per hectare,
and additions by fertilization were between 8 and 20 kg of fluoride per
hectare (Oelschlager, 1972).  Of this amount, only about 0.1% to 0.4% is
removed by harvesting crops.

     Levels of nutrients in the soil  can also affect the amount of fluo-
ride taken up by plants.  The data of Brennan, Leone, and Daines (1950)
(Table 4.1) suggest that levels of nitrogen, calcium, and phosphorus
affect the concentration of fluoride  in tomato roots and leaves when flu-
oride is supplied to soil as sodium fluoride.  However, the fluoride con-
centrations in roots and leaves are not greatly affected when fluoride is
supplied in gaseous form (hydrogen fluoride) to the plant.  On the other
hand, MacLean et al. (1969) found an  effect of mineral nutrition on the
response of tomato plants to gaseous hydrogen fluoride.  Exposure to hydro-
gen fluoride increased the extent of  foliar injury in plants grown in
either a calcium-deficient or magnesium-deficient medium.  Fluoride uptake
was greater in plants grown on potassium-deficient medium and was less in
plants grown on calcium- or magnesium-deficient media.  McCune, Hitchcock,
and Weinstein (1966) found that nutrient levels did not affect fluoride
accumulation in gladiolus, but the extent of necrosis was affected.  Low
levels of nitrogen or calcium reduced necrosis, whereas low levels of
potassium, phosphorus, or magnesium increased necrosis.  Necrosis was not
affected by either iron or magnesium deficiencies.  Pea plants grown in
low-calcium solution showed more injury (reductions in number and weight
of seeds) from fluoride fumigation than when grown in standard solution
(Pack and Sulzbach, 1976).  Pepper, however, showed the opposite response.
Several types of mineral-deficient bean plants were tested, and only the
nitrogen-deficient plants developed necrosis upon exposure to gaseous
hydrogen fluoride (Adams and Sulzbach, 1961).

-------
TABLE A.I.  EFFECT Of 50 ppa FLUORINE (AS NaP) IN NUTRIENT SOLUTIONS (SERIES A AND B) AND OF HP FUMIGATION (SERIES C AND D) ON THE DEGREE OF INJURY
                 AND FLUORIDE LEVELS IN TISSUES OF TOMATO PLANTS GROWN WITH DIFFERENT l.KVFI.S OF NITROGEN, CALCIUM, AND PHOSPHORUS
Serlea A
(13 day* treatment)
Nu*n«,t Concentration
Nuttltnt (PP.) Degree
of


Nitrogen



Calclim




Phoaphoru*





1A
56
112
AA8
10
AO
80
2AO

0
0.8
IS. 5
62
injury

None
None
Moderate
None
None
Moderate
None
None

Trace
Slight
Slight
Moderate
Fluoride
in tlaaue
(PP»)
Leave*

7A
96
SAO
160
170
950
116
62

27A
A 80
A6A
1010
Root*

280
3010
2000
1800
A60
1290
3610
A 360

2739
2305
1050
970
Series
,eo Day* of
injury <"«••«<


None
Moderate
Moderate
None
None
Moderate
Moderate
None

Trace
Slight
Moderate
Severe


11
2A
11
31
31
6
fl
11

31
31
13
13
B

Fluoride
in tlaau*
(PP«)
Leave*

250
1000
500
430
A35
1000
850
161

A21
620
890
672
Roots

1310
3AAO
1185
1220
A80
750
1300
39AS

6585
2305
2080
1340
(A8
Series C
ppb HF. A
Fluoride
in leave*11
(pp.)
1 day

AO
A3
35
A7
AS
55
AO
45

43
AO
23
AO
7 day*

51
AO
32
30
SO
30
AO
30

AO
40
28
35
.5 hr)
(A70
""root0 Flw
7-day (l
average .

18
13
23
IS
14
22
18
14

30
11
10
1A

375
655
500
SAO
460
435
550
A05

385
375
A 70
57 S
Series D
ppb HF, 3.
5 hr)
>rtde """"I
>>»>" l;4S
7 days
i,
415"
360'.
465^
360
355^
405;

255
K
4201
365
A 20',
280''
average
(PP»)

19
13
22
16
15
32
25
27

13
32
17
16
   ?No leaf Injury In Series C.
   ^Slight leaf Injury.
   ^Moderate leaf Injury.
    Severe leaf Injury.
   Source:  Adapted from Brannan, Leone, and Dalnei, 1950, Tables III, IV, and V, pp. 739-7A2.  Reprinted bv permission of the publisher.

-------
                                    112


      Bovay (1969) observed that certain  fertilizers containing boron
produced symptoms of fluoride damage  in  crops.   Field and pot studies
demonstrated that apricot trees, grapevines,  and forage plants took up
more  fluoride from boron-enriched fertilizers than from fertilizers with-
out boron, even though the fluoride content  in the two types of fertiliz-
ers was similar.  About 57% of the fluoride  in the boron fertilizer was
fluoroborate.  Apparently boron can increase plant uptake of fluoride.

4.2.1.2  Exposure of Plants to Fluoride  in Air — It has long been recog-
nized that exposure of plants to gaseous and particulate fluorides in the
atmosphere results in fluoride accumulation  and eventual injury (National
Academy of Sciences, 1971; Thomas and Alther, 1966; Treshow, 1971).

      The data of Hill (1969) illustrate  the  rate and extent of uptake of
hydrogen fluoride by gladiolus leaves (Table 4.2).  This general trend
is observed by most researchers.  Additional data on the relationships
among length of exposure, air concentration,  and tissue concentration of
fluoride are presented in Section 4.2.4.
                     TABLE 4.2.  CHANGES IN FLUORIDE CONCENTRATIONS IN
                    DIFFERENT SECTIONS OF SNOW PRINCESS GLADIOLUS LEAVES
                       FOLLOWING FUMIGATION WITH HYDROGEN FLUORIDE

Fluoride
treatment

890 ug/m*
for 1 hr

40 ug/m*
for 24 hr


Time after
beginning
treatment

2 hr
5 hr
45 hr
1 day
2 days
10 days


Tip
4 in.
71
94
159
132
188
224
Fluoride
(ppm dry
Next
4 in
87
115
104
97
83
71
content
weight)
Remainder
of leaf
92
68
45
34
26
27
                      Source: Adapted from Hill, 1969, Table 1, p. 332.
                   Reprinted by permission of the publisher.
     A significant  portion of the fluoride associated with  plants is not
absorbed but  is merely bound to the leaf or stem surface.   The amount
bound is highly variable and can be as high as 75%  (Thomas  and Alther,
1966).  Exposure  of plants to airborne cryolite increases the  tissue flu-
oride concentration;  however, a considerable portion of this can be removed
by washing  the tissue (up to 70% in tomato and gladiolus) (Ledbetter,
Mavrodineanu, and Weiss, 1960; McCune et al., 1965).  As usual, tissue
content depends on  the fluoride concentration and exposure  time, but few
fluoride symptoms occur with cryolite, even at relatively high tissue
fluoride concentrations.

     As might be  expected, soybean plants accumulate considerably less
fluoride when exposed to nighttime fumigation with hydrogen fluoride as
compared with daytime fumigations, presumably because of stomatal closure
(Poovaiah and Wiebe,  1973).  Plants exposed to nighttime fumigations were

-------
                                   113


only slightly injured.  On the other hand, Adams, Hendrix, and Applegate
(1957) found that with the same extent of injury the foliar fluoride con-
centration was less in nighttime-fumigated plants than in daytime-fumigated
plants.  However, with nighttime fumigations, longer exposures at equiva-
lent fumigant concentrations were required to produce injury.

4.2.2  Translocation

     The amount of fluoride translocation occurring in plants depends on
the site of absorption.  For example, root absorption of fluoride by mature
navel orange trees led to large increases in the fluoride content of roots
and a small but significant increase in leaf fluoride content (Brewer et
al., 1959) (Table 4.3).  Growth was depressed when trees were grown in
solutions containing 25 ppm fluoride.  The large amount of fluoride found
in small roots was perhaps due to the formation of insoluble calcium fluo-
ride in the soil and its adherence to the root surface.

     Peach seedlings exposed to 10 and 25 ppm fluoride in nutrient solu-
tion accumulated fluoride in leaf tissue to 220 and 261 ppm, respectively,
whereas control leaf tissue contained only 6 ppm fluoride (Leone et al.,
1948).  Exposure of Rutgers tomatoes to nutrient solutions containing 10
and 25 ppm fluoride resulted in the accumulation of 82 and 277 ppm fluo-
ride, respectively, in leaf tissue.  Thus fluoride supplied to the root
can be translocated (presumably by the transpiration stream) to aerial
portions of the plant.

     However, exposure of the aerial portion of the plant to fluoride does
not lead to increases in the fluoride content of roots.  Fumigation of
tomato plants with 0.048 and 0.47 ppm fluoride (4.5- and 3.5-hr exposures
respectively), which elevated fluoride levels in leaves, did not increase
the root fluoride content above control values (Brennan, Leone, and Daines,
1950).  Thus no significant fluoride translocation from shoots to roots
occurred.  Continuous fumigation with about 1 pg/m3 of fluoride did not
produce injury symptoms in alfalfa, orchard grass, chard, and romain let-
tuce, and most of the fluoride was found in the leaves, again indicating
little translocation to roots (Benedict, Ross, and Wade, 1964).

     Leaf margins and tips often have higher fluoride concentrations than
the rest of the leaf blade (Benedict, Ross, and Wade, 1964; Garrec, Plebin,
and Lhoste, 1975; Hitchcock, Zimmerman, and Coe, 1962).  Movement within
the leaf probably occurs through the transpiration stream (Zimmerman and
Hitchcock, 1956).  Fluoride is taken up and distributed mainly to the tip
when cut leaves are placed in aqueous fluoride solutions (Davison, Marsland,
and Betts, 1974).  When the plant is exposed to particulate fluorides, lit-
tle translocation is observed.-  McCune et al. (1965) found that gladiolus
leaves exposed to cryolite contained the same tissue concentration in all
portions of the leaf; exposure to gaseous hydrogen fluoride resulted in
accumulation of considerably more fluoride in the tip region.  New leaves
of potted elm and black locust that had been exposed to atmospheric flu-
orides during the winter contained higher fluoride levels than control
leaves, suggesting mobilization and translocation of fluoride from bark
and buds to the new leaves (Keller, 1974).

-------
                                     114
   TABLE 4. 1.   FLUORIDE  CONTENT AND FRESH WEIGHTS  OF MATURE NAVEL ORANGE TREES
       GROWN FOR 18 MONTHS  IN SOLUTION CULTURES WITH AND WITHOUT FLUORIDE
                        PRESENT IN THE NUTRIENT SOLUTIONS
         Tissue analyzed
                                     Fluoride content
                                          (pp«n)a
                                    25 ppm
                                   fluoride
                                    added"
               No
             fluoride
             added0
                          Fresh weight  (kg)
            25 ppm
           fluoride
            added
            No
          fluoride
           added
Spring flush leaves,  1-year-old

Branches, whole cross sections
  Large  (over 1 in.)
  Intermediate (*j-l in.)
  Twigs

Trunk
  Old xylem
  New xylem
  Phloem and bark
  Whole cross section

Roots
  Large roots, whole
    Center wood, old  xylem
    Intermediate wood,  new  xylem
    Epidermis
  Small roots

Fruit
  Rind
  Pulp, Juice
    34


     5.5
     6.0
    10.0


     3.0
     3.5
     8.3
     7.0
    67
     9
    13
   641
20,000
     1.70
     6.14*
 5.5


 2.0
 2.5
 5.0


 1.0
 2.0
 4.0
 3.0


 6
13
 4
 3
46


 0.271;
 0.09
3.49
3.58
2.98
                          8.13
6.18

4.49
5.06
           6.31
     ^On an 80°C dry weight.
      Average of two trees.
      .Average of four trees.
     ^Fresh weight.
     Source:  Adapted from Brewer et al., 1959,  Table  2, p. 185, and Table 4,
   187.  Reprinted by permission of the publisher.
4.2.3  Cellular Metabolism of  Fluoride

     Fluoride ions are very  reactive and can be expected to combine with
various molecular species within cells.  Fluoride  Is an Inhibitor of var-
ious metalloenzymes (Hewitt  and Nicholas, 1963); the mechanisms of Inhibi-
tion are  discussed more fully  in Section 4.3.1.6.

     The  observation In the  1940s that fluoroacetate Is the toxic Ingre-
dient  In  the South African plant Didhapetalum aymoew demonstrated that
certain plants have the ability to synthesize covalently bonded carbon-
fluorine  compounds (Peters,  1972a).   Approximately 36 species and varie-
ties,  found mainly in Africa,  Australia, and Brazil, are now known to

-------
                                   115


synthesize fluoroacetate.  Oxylobiwn pawiflorwn and Gaetvoldbiwn bilobum
have been reported to have fluoroacetate concentrations as high as 12,500
ppm.  Monofluoroacetate has been shown to be the toxic principle In GaBtvo-
lobiw gpandiflovum (McEwan, 1964), Aaaoia georginae (Oelrichs and McEwan,
1961), and Palioourea rrwogvavii (de Ollveira, 1963), three plants
extremely poisonous to livestock.

     Analysis of many other species, however, has failed to detect fluo-
roacetate or other organofluorldes.  The presence of specific organoflu-
orides In plant tissues can be established by the use of extraction and
analytical techniques that can cope with interfering substances.  Vickery,
Vickery, and Ashu (1973) discussed the interference of iron and pigments
with the detection of monofluoroacetate in Diahapetalum heudelotti, a spe-
cies in which organofluorldes had not previously been detected.  Peters
and Shorthouse (1964) expressed the opinion that synthesis of the carbon-
fluorine bond is not a general property of all plants.  Kakabadse et al.
(1971) supported this statement with the observation that Darjeeling tea,
which has a high fluorine content, contains only inorganic fluoride.
Peters (19722?), however, later acknowledged that many plants possess trace
amounts of fluoroacetate and fluorocltrate and commented that they had
detected fluorocltrate in commercial tea (about 30 yg per gram tea) by
gas chromatography.  Cheng et al.  (1968) observed that soybeans grown in
nutrient solution with sodium fluoride or with hydrogen fluoride fumiga-
tion also synthesized fluoroacetate and fluorocitrate.  These compounds
were identified by paper chromatography.  Lovelace, Miller, and Welkle
(1968) found both fluoroacetate (179 ug per gram leaf dry weight) and
fluorocltrate (896 ug per gram leaf dry weight) in forage crops (pasture
mix of Medioago eativa and Agvapyvon orietatum) grown near a phosphate
plant.  Control area crops contained no detectable fluoroacetate or flu-
orocltrate.  In the above studies, additional support for the occurrence
of fluorocltrate was established by experiments demonstrating the .inhibi-
tion of purified aconltase.  Later work by Yu and Miller (1970) produced
gas chromatographic evidence for fluoroacetate and fluorocltrate in A.
ovietatum, although these compounds were not detected in all samples.
Miller (1972) could not detect any fluoroorganic acids in grass samples
from several locations.  Ward and Huskisson (1969) reported that lettuce
could convert fluoroacetate to fluorocltrate, but later work (Ward, 1972)
showed the amount converted to be quite small (about 2%).  There are not
enough data to conclude that all plants have the ability to synthesize
fluoroorganic acids, but the results with soybean and forage plants
suggest this possibility.

     Organofluorides have been extensively studied in species of Diahape-
talum and A.  georginae.  No organic or inorganic fluorides were detected
in D,  aymoewn seeds, but the leaves contained fluoroacetic acid.  However,
Diohapetalum toxiaavium seeds, which are toxic, contained iD-fluoroolelc
acid and another long chain fatty acid, but the leaves contained no fluo-
rides (Peters and Hall, 1960).  Ward et al. (1964) later found a number
of fatty acids (e.g., u-fluoropalmitic acid) in D. toaeioarium seeds and
suggested that longer chain u-fluoro acids were produced by additions of
malonyl coenzyme A to shorter chain u-fluoro acids.  Vickery and Vickery

-------
                                  116


(1972), however, reported that D. toxiaarium plants contain both fluoro-
acetate (450 ppm in young leaves, 60 ppm in mature leaves, and 1100 ppm
in leaves adnate to flowers) and inorganic fluoride (65 ppm in young
leaves, 14 ppm in mature leaves, and 85 ppm in leaves adnate to flowers).
Tap and lateral roots contained 23 and <1 ppm fluoroacetate and 30 and
38 ppm inorganic fluoride respectively.  The high fluoride content prob-
ably was not related to fluoride pollution because fluoride concentrations
in the soil and water were low, and other plants in the vicinity did not
contain more than 2 ppm fluoride.

     Hall (1974) exposed cultured A. geovginae (in either quartz or soil)
to solutions of sodium monofluoroacetate or ammonium fluoride.  In all
cases, most of the fluoride found in the roots and leaves was inorganic
(Table 4.4).  No biosynthesis of fluoroacetate was detected in the plants.
Indeed, the plants apparently metabolized the added monofluoroacetate to
inorganic fluoride, although the existence of microbial degradation prior
to uptake was not experimentally tested.  Thus while the toxic principle
of A. georginae is fluoroacetate (Oelrichs and McEwan, 1961), in vivo for-
mation of fluoroacetate is not easily induced in cultured plants.  Preuss,
Birkhahn, and Bergmann (1970), however, did detect fluoroacetate in tissue
cultures from A. georginae stem sections.

     Metabolism of 1*C-labeled fluoroacetate in A. georginae, peanut, cas-
tor bean, and pinto bean produced labeled carbon dioxide (indicating cleav-
age of the carbon-fluorine bond) and radioactivity in neutral lipids and
water-soluble fractions (Preuss, Lemmens, and Weinstein, 1968).  Preuss and
Weinstein (1969) later showed that germinating peanut seeds could cleave
the carbon-fluorine bond in fluoroacetate.  No fluorine was detected in
fatty acids, and only inorganic fluoride was detected in the seedlings.
No information was found concerning enzyme systems in plants which cleave
the carbon-fluorine bond.

     Hall (1972) and Hall and Cain (1972) collected and studied a variety
of toxic plants and the soils in which they grew.  Organofluorides were
detected in soils, perhaps mainly as fluoroacetate, but no relation to
organic fluoride content in the plant could be demonstrated.  Hall (1972)
reported data on total and organic fluoride content in portions of toxic
plants  (Table 4.4) and concluded that there were wide variations in leaf
fluoride content in all species, that high total fluoride content does
not necessarily mean a high organic fluoride content, and that differences
in distribution within the plant existed in members of the same species
growing in Africa and Australia.

     In plants that contain fluoroacetate as the toxic ingredient, lit-
tle is known about the specific environmental or physiological conditions
that determine the amounts or distribution of organofluorides formed.
Similarly, there is little information on why fluoroacetate is not toxic
to those plants possessing measurable amounts of it.  Fluoroacetate and
fluoroacetamide have also been used as systemic insecticides for plants.
Injury  to plants occurred at doses 50 to 100 times that required to kill
Aphis fdbae  (David and Gardiner, as cited in Treble, Lamport, and Peters,

-------
                        117
TABLE 4.4.   DISTRIBUTION OF FLUORINE IN TROPICAL PLANTS
Fluorine (ppm in
Species
Aoaoia georginae
(toxic)

A. georginae (experi-
mentally cultivated)
Diohapetalum aymoeum



D, gieinaenae



D. moeaambicerwe

D. etuhlmannii









D. toxiaanum





GaBtrolobium bilobum




G. aalliataahye



G. aalycinum



G, grondiflontn


G. miarooarpion

G. apinoeum
G. villoeun
Tissue
Seed
Leaf
Root
Leaf
Root
Leaf
Stem
Small root
Large root
Seed
Leaf
Stem
Root
Leaf
Stem
Seed (1)
Seed (2)
Seed shell
(endocarp)
Leaf
Thin stem
Thick stem
Root (without
bark)
Root bark
Seed
Leaf
Stem
Root
Seed shell
(endocarp)
Seed
Seed pod
Leaf
Stem
Root
Seed
Leaf
Stem
Root
Seed
Leaf
Stem
Root
Seed
Leaf
Stem
Leaf
Root
Seed
Leaf
Total
4
42
11
33
36
111
341
162
196
19
9
13
38
11
72
870
1470
223

142
321
265
1916

385
1980
145
75
127
19

1292
163
175
34
15
473
35
27
12
760
8
77
19
488
11
15
27
35
65
26
Acid-
labile
4
19
5
15
29
6
23
48
139
12
7
4
16
6
70
622
1360
218

55
164
73
1440

337
192
55
59
33
9

38
10
9
10
2
21
4
1
2
35
4
6
4
10
6
4
8
35
1
8
air-dried
tissue)
Organic
soluble
Total
<1
14
6
<1
<1
99
242
92
17
10
2
2
2
4
2
292
93
8

50
126
144
22

19
1800
32
16
66
8

1230
128
160
7
9
443
30
18
9
669
4
51
16
256
2
4
3

7
18
Acid-
labile
<1
2
1
<1
<1
2
2
4
2
3
2
1
2
2
1
42
13
3

3
3
1
4

16
169
3
1
12
1

42
4
4
<1
3
6
2
1
1
7
1
3
3
2
1
1
<1

3
1

-------
                                    118
                             TABLE 4.4 (continued)
                                        Fluorine (ppm in air-dried tissue)
•Organic^
Species
Oxylobium parviflorum









Palicourea maragnwii




Tissue
Seed
Calyx (flower
head)
Corolla
(petals)
Mature leaf
Young leaves
and steins
Thin stem
Small root
Seed
Fruit stalk
Leaf
Stem
Root
Total
1400
877

206

116
465

67
10
1228
1216
455
118
41
Acid-
labile
44
34

6

9
23

2
2
30
52
146
11
10
soluble"
Total
1090
744

119

110
440

59
7
1136
1010
278
117
31
Acid-
labile
3
6

1

3
20

1
3
15
6
8
1
4
            '^Defined as extractable in alkaline 902 propanol.

            Source:  Adapted from Hall, 1972, Table 5, p. 861.
        permission of the publisher.
Reprinted by
1962).  Trebel, Lamport,  and Peters (1962) found that fluoroacetate  in-
hibited the aconitate hydratase (aconitase) of Acer pseudoplatanus tissue
culture cells  to  a much lesser extent than pig heart aconitate hydratase.
Inhibition by  fluoroacetate was largely reversible by the  addition of
isocitrate.  Louw, de Villiers, and Grobbelaar (1970) also observed  that
the aconitase  of  D.  oymosum and of Pcari-nariton capense was  less sensitive
than pig heart aconitase to fluoroacetate.  Since 50 mW fluoroacetate did
not cause citrate to accumulate in leaf discs of D. cymosum but  did  cause
accumulation in the  disc of P. oapense, they suggested that D. cymosum
did not convert fluoroacetate to fluorocitrate while P. oapenee  did.

4.2.4  Distribution

4.2.4.1  Concentration in Tissues — For plants growing in  unpolluted areas,
the concentration of fluoride in tissues is usually between 2 and 20 ppm
(National Academy of Sciences, 1971).  The exact concentration depends on
many factors such as species, organ examined, age, and physiological con-
dition.  Table 4.5 is a compilation of fluoride concentrations found in
selected crop  plants and a few noncrop plants grown in unpolluted areas
or used as controls  in fumigation experiments.  The concentration of
fluoride in most  of  these plants is between 0.4 and 30 ppm.

     There are few data on the fluoride content of noncrop plants growing
in unpolluted  areas.   Most plants do not accumulate fluoride from soil;
however, some  members of the Theaceae family are accumulator species.
Thus leaves of camellia and tea contain extremely high concentrations of
fluoride (Brewer, 1966; Thomas and Alther, 1966).

-------
                          119
TABLE 4.5.   FLUORIDE CONCENTRATIONS IN SELECTED PLANTS*
Plant

Alfalfa





Orchard grass

Red clover, timothy

Clover

Grass, hay
Lucerne
Beet

Corn


Rutabaga

Wheat

Rye

Barley

Oats

Corn
Rice

Potato


Sugar beet


Endive

Lettuce


Spinach


Cabbage

Cauliflower

Cress
Parsley
Celery





Part

Tops







Tops





Roots
Leaves
Cobs
Stalk and
leaves


Grain
Straw
Grain
Straw
Grain
Straw
Grain
Straw
Grain
Grain

Tuber
Leaves
Peel
Root
Leaves

Leaves

Leaves





Outer leaves
Edible part
Flowers
Leaves


Leaves
Leaflets

Stalks

Heart
Fluoride
concentration „
(pp. dry CoamentB
weight)
Forage and feed plants
0.8-36.5 (3.6 Area free of Indus-
mean) trial pollution
7-15 Controls

10 Controls

10 Controls

10 Mixed planting

6-13 Controls

1-6
2-4
2.9
7
1.6
2.2-6.3

4-7
Grains
1
2.3-6.4
1.5
1.2
1.7
9.0
0.5
6.8
0.15-0.38
0.76
Root crops
1.5-3.0
9-30
5.0-22.5
3.3-6.0
12
Vegetables
51 Controls

23 Controls

4.4-11.3
35 Controls

1.3-28.3
9.5
1.5
0'.9
0.8
4.4
9.0
5.7
10

2

4
Reference

Suttie, cited In
Israel, 19742?
Zimmerman and
Hitchcock, 1956
Benedict, Ross,
and Wade, 1964
Benedict, Ross,
and Wade, 1964
MacLean and
Schneider, 1973
Gislger, cited in
Groth, 1975
Garber, 1967
Garber, 1967
Garber, 1967
Garber, 1967
Garber, 1967
Garber, 1967

Garber, 1967

Garber, 1967
Garber, 1967
Garber, 1967
Garber, 1967
Garber, 1967
Garber, 1967
Garber, 1967
Garber, 1967
Garber, 1967
Garber, 1967

Garber, 1967
Garber, 1967
Garber, 1967
Garber, 1967
Garber, 1967

Benedict , Ross ,
and Wade, 1964
Benedict, Ross,
and Wade, 1964
Garber, 1967
Benedict , Ross ,
and Wade, 1964
Garber, 1967
Garber, 1967
Garber, 1967
Garber, 1967
Garber, 1967
Garber, 1967
Garber, 1967
Garber, 1967
Zimmerman and
Hitchcock, 1956
Zimmerman and
Hitchcock, 1956
Garber, 1967

-------
                                    120
                             TABLE 4.5 (continued)
Plant
Carrots

Radishes

Onions
Beans






Tomato








Red beets
Part
Roots
Tops
Roots
Tops


Tendergreen
leaves

Pinto leaves


Leaves


Leaves

Stem

Fruit


Fluoride
concentration .
(ppm dry Comments
weight)
0.4-8.4
40
1
2
3.0
3.2
13.2 Controls


13.1 Controls


8.0 Controls


8-13

2

2

2.8
Reference
Carter, 1967
Garber, 1967
Garter, 1967
Garber, 1967
Garber, 1967
Garber, 1967
McCune, Weinsteln,
and Mancinl,
1970
McCune, Welnstein,
and Mancinl,
1970
McCune, Weinsteln,
and Mancinl,
1970
Zimmerman and
Hitchcock, 1956
Zimmerman and
Hitchcock, 1956
Zimmerman and
Hitchcock, 1956
Garter, 1967
                               Noncrop plants
Peach


Aeaoulus hippoaaetanea
SambuouB nigra
Acer sp.
Trig germmiaa
Taxue baoaata
Pinue eilvestria
Water hyacinth


Leaves


Leaves
Leaves




Leaf
Petiole

28


3.4
2.5
2.0
2.1
0.4
0.7
25
60

Unpolluted area








Growing naturally
in water contain-
ing 1 ppm fluoride
Drovley, Rayner,
and Jephcott,
1963
Garber, 1967
Garber, 1967
Garber, 1967
Garber, 1967
Garber, 1967
Garber, 1967
Ras et al. , cited
In Groth, 1975

    ^Plants either growing wild not near obvious fluoride pollution sources or plants used as
controls in fumigation experiments.
     Table 4.4  lists the fluoride content of  some toxic tropical plants.
The indicated fluoride concentrations are relatively high.  Since these
plants were grown in soils low in fluoride, accumulation in these species
is significant.   No comments were made on the possibilities of fluoride
air pollution in the areas of collection.

     The National Academy of Sciences (1971)  listed several conclusions
about the relationship between environmental  fluoride concentrations and
plant fluoride  concentrations:  (1) Soil is the  main source of fluoride
in vegetation which is not exposed to air pollution.  (2) There is not
necessarily a direct relationship between soil fluoride concentration and
plant fluoride  concentration, but plants in acid soils generally have
higher fluoride concentrations than plants in alkaline soils.  (3) Indus-
trial air pollution exposes plants to both particulate and gaseous fluo-
rides which are taken up (or surface bound) by aerial portions of the

-------
                                   121


plant.  The amount of fluoride deposited on soil does not increase the
soil content enough to significantly increase root absorption of fluoride
(and thus concentration in the plant) .

     If it is assumed that plants are passive accumulators of fluoride,
a useful relationship may be expressed by the equation AF = KCT , where
AF is the change in tissue fluoride content due to atmospheric fluoride
exposure, K is the apparent accumulation coefficient, C is the concentra-
tion of fluoride in air, and T is the time of exposure (National Academy
of Sciences, 1971).  Complicating circumstances arise, however, in apply-
ing this equation.  K is not constant and is usually reported only for
gaseous hydrogen fluoride exposures.  Moreover, particulate fluorides
are common in the atmosphere and could affect the determination of K in
field studies.  In fact, there is a lack of field data relating plant
fluoride levels to atmospheric fluoride levels (Israel, 1974a; National
Academy of Sciences, 1971).  Such information is needed, however, to
assess fluoride movement via feeds to animals.  With the use of limed
filter papers to measure airborne fluorides, Israel (1974a) found an
average K value of 3.8 for field crops of alfalfa and orchard grass.
This is about two times the value found by other researchers for gaseous
hydrogen fluoride exposures.  Israel's overall conclusion was that "fac-
tors governing the accumulation of gaseous and particulate fluorides are
not well enough understood at this time to allow a rational interpreta-
tion of the field results."

     Only limited data exist on deposition velocities (vg) for gaseous
fluorides.  Israel (1974a) reported values of 16 and 31 ppm/sec for gas-
eous fumigation experiments with alfalfa and field exposures with alfalfa
and orchard grass.  The corresponding velocities related to the leaf
surface area (v^ were 3.2 and 6.2 ppm/sec.
     In general, plants exposed to high levels of atmospheric fluorides
have elevated fluoride levels.  Table 4.6 gives the range of fluoride con-
centrations found in organs of different species exposed to varying concen-
trations of fluorides and the range of concentrations in those tissues
which show toxicity symptoms.  Fluoride accumulates primarily in leaves
of fumigated plants, while fruits and seeds generally accumulate little
fluoride (Pack and Sulzbach, 1976).  Oat seeds may be an exception.  There
are many other examples of increased fluoride contents in plants sprayed
or fumigated with fluorides.  Additional data presented in greater detail
are given in Figures 4.2 and 4.3 and Table 4.7.

     The experiments cited used relatively high fluoride concentrations,
but the data of Pack (1971i) showed that even with lower fumigation con-
centrations, bean leaves accumulated fluoride in amounts roughly propor-
tional to the concentration of fumigating gas.  For instance, tendergreen
beans accumulated 260, 700, and 1200 ppm fluoride when exposed to fumiga-
tion concentrations of 2.2, 6.6, and 13.9 yg of fluoride per cubic meter
respectively.  Stem, petioles, and fruit also showed proportional increases
with increased fumigant concentration; the absolute amounts were consider-
ably smaller, however.  In controlled exposures, the fluorine content of
grass was found to be proportional to the fluoride concentration in air

-------
TABLE 4.6.  FLUORIDE VALUES IN TISSUES OF VARIOUS PLANTS
Plant
Alfalfa (Medicago eativa)








Apple (Mains spp.)




Apricot (Primus armeniaaa)














Avocado (Peraea amerieana)


Bean (Phaseolue spp.)

Blueberry (Vacainium spp.)


Type of culture
Exposed to 1.5 ppb F°
Exposed to 5.0 ppb F
Exposed to 10.0 ppb F
Field


Field


Exposed to 1.5 ppb F
Exposed to 5.0 ppb F
Exposed to 10.0 ppb F
Before and after
exposure to HF gas
Orchard, near Al
reduction plant
Exposed to 1.5 ppb F
Exposed to 5.0 ppb F
Exposed to 10.0 ppb F
Field


Field


Field near steel
plant
Field near steel
plant
Exposed to 5.0 ppb F
aa HF, 5 to 17
weeks
Grown In soil to
which NaF was added
Exposed to 1.5 ppb F
Exposed to 5.0 ppb F
Exposed to 10.0 ppb F
Tissue
sampled
Leaves
Leaves
Leaves
Leaves


Leaves


Leaves
Leaves
Leaves
Leaves

Leaves

Leaves
Leaves
Leaves
Leaves


Fruit


Leaves

Leaves

Leaves


Leaves

Leaves
Leaves
Leaves
Fluoride concentration in dry matter (ppm)a
Sample description Internedlate
range* Hlgh range
Not specified 25.00-149.00
Not specified 132.00-203.00
Not specified 182.00
From industrial and 3.00-9.00 13.00-52.00
nonlndus trial
areas (washed)
From industrial and 5.00-15.00 19.00-65.00
nonlndustrlal
areas (unwashed)
Not specified 35.00-18.00
Not specified 37.00
Not specified
Not specified 24.00 56.00

Not specified

Not specified
Not specified
Not specified
From industrial and 1.00-6.00 15.00-30.00
nonindustrial
areas (washed)
From industrial and 0.04-0.25
nonindustrial
areas (washed)
Mature (washed)

Mature (unwashed)

Washed 5.00-17.00


Not specified 19.00

Not specified
Not specified
Not specified
Showing toxlclty
symptoms









72.00-234.00
79.00-259.00
142.00-194.00


247.00-403.00

58.00-130.00
83.00-84.00
107.00
32.00-640.00


1.35


168.00

336.00

195.00-1027.00


<310.00

34.00-53.00
72.00-103.00
64.00

-------
                             TABLE 4.6 (continued)
Plant
Buckwheat (Fagopyrum spp.)










Carrot (Dauaus aarota
eativa)

Cherry (Primus oeraeue)




Grapefruit (Citrue
paradiei)

Lemon (Citrus limon)


Mandarin (Citrue
retioulatd)

Orange (Citrue eineneie)






Type of culture
Soil with and without
F added (limed)
Soil with and without
F added (unllmed)
Grown In soil to
which NaF was added
Grown In acid soil;
exposed to HF gas
Grown In limed soil
to which HF was
added
Exposed to 1.5 ppb F
Exposed to 5.0 ppb F
Exposed to 10.0 ppb F
Before and after
exposure to HF gas
Exposed to 1.5 ppb F
Exposed to 5.0 ppb F
Exposed to 10.0 ppb F
Exposed to 2.0 to 5.0
ppb F as HF for 6
months
Exposed to 2.0 to 5.0
ppb F as HF for 6
months
Exposed to 2.0 to 5.0
ppb F as HF for 6
months
Exposed to 2.0 to 5.0
ppb F as HF for 6
months
Field


Cultures with about
Tissue
sampled
Leaves

Leaves

Leaves

Leaves

Leaves


Leaves
Leaves
Leaves
Leaves

Leaves
Leaves
Leaves
Leaves


Leaves


Leaves


Leaves


Leaves


Leaves
Fluoride concentration in dry matter (ppm)a
Sample description
Not specified

Not specified

Not specified

Not specified

Not specified


Not specified
Not specified
Not specified
Not specified

Not specified
Not specified
Not specified
Washed


Washed


Washed


Washed


From industrial and
nonindustrial
areas (washed)
Washed
Intermediate ... .
range* Hlgh range
10.00 87.00-900.00

59.00

16.00-62.00 101.00

37.00-98.00

10.00 900.00





20.00




2.00-8.00 24.00-48.00


5.00-9.00 16.00-24.00


3.00-6.00 40.00-59.00


8.00-11.00 20.00-116.00


1.00-6.00 7.00-211.00


2.00-5.50 34.00-60.00
Showing toxiclty
symptoms
2450.00-9900.00



533.00-1910.00

594.00-1388.00




250.00-323.00
309.00-723.00
307.00
112.00

51.00-62.00
51.00-53.00
126.00
163.00-365.00


72.00-146.00


85.00-345.00


158.00-334.00






                                                                                                                      to
                                                                                                                      to
1.0 and 25.0 ppm F

-------
TABLE 4.6 (continued)
Plant




Corn (Zea may a)




Sweet corn














Cotton (Goaaypivm spp.)


Douglas fir (Pseudotauga
taxifoUa)

Elm, English (tfZmua
prooara)

Fig (Fiaue spp.)

Type of culture
Cultures with about
1.0 and 25.0 ppm F
Cultures with about
1.0 and 25.0 ppm F
Before and after
exposure to HF gas
Exposed to 1.5 ppb F
Exposed to 5.0 ppb F
Exposed to 10.0 ppb F
Exposed to 0.0 and
2.0 to 3.0 ppb F as
HF in atmosphere
Exposed to 0.0 and
2.0 to 3.0 ppb F as
HF in atmosphere
Exposed to 0.0 and
2.0 to 3.0 ppb F as
HF in atmosphere
Exposed to 0.0 and
2.0 to 3.0 ppb F as
HF in atmosphere
Exposed to 0.0 and
2.0 to 3.0 ppb F as
HF in atmosphere
Grown in neutral
soil; exposed to
HF gas
Exposed to 1.5 ppb F
Exposed to 5.0 ppb F
Exposed to 10.0 ppb F
Exposed to 1.5 ppb F
Exposed to 5.0 ppb F
Exposed to 10.0 ppb F
Orchard near Al
reduction plant
Tissue
sampled
Hood

Feeder roots

Leaves

Leaves
Leaves
Leaves
Leaves


Husks


Kernels


Cobs


Stalks


Leaves


Needles
Needles
Needles
Leaves
Leaves
Leaves
Leaves

Fluoride concentration in dry matter (ppm)a
Sample description
Hashed

Hashed

Not specified

Not specified
Not specified
Not specified
Nature (washed)


Hashed


Unwashed


Unwashed


Hashed


Unwashed


Not specified
Not specified
Not specified
Not specified
Not specified
Not specified
Not specified

Intermediate
range0 6 6
1.00-5.00 3.00-10.00

3.00-46.00 9.00-20,000.00

8.00

151.00
99.00-133.00
85.00
5.00-14.00 29.00-67.00


9.00 12.00


2.00 10.00


3.00 3.00


6.00 15.00


5000.00


102.00-238.00
103.00-200.00
212.00





Showing toxicity
symptoms




302.00


178.00
147.00
48.00-491.00




















18.00-265.00
72.00
160.00
247.00-403.00

                                                                                         ro

-------
TABLE 4.6 (continued)
Plant
Fir (Abiea grmckia)


Gladiolus (Gladiolus spp.)









'


Grape (Vitie spp.)


Wine grapea






Hemlock (Teuga aanadeneie)
Kale or collard (Braaeiaa
oleraaea aoephala)


Larch (Larix spp.)


Type of culture
Exposed to 1.5 ppb F
Exposed to 5.0 ppb F
Exposed to 10.0 ppb F
Near fluoride-
emitting factory
Near fluoride-
emitting factory
Exposed to HF gas
Grown in soil to
which NaF was added
Exposed to 1.5 ppb F
Exposed to 5.0 ppb F
Exposed to 10.0 ppb F
Exposed to 0.0 and
5.0 ppb F as HF for
several months
Exposed to 1.5 ppb F
Exposed to 5.0 ppb F
Exposed to 10.0 ppb F
Field


Field near steel
plant
Field near steel
plant
Exposed to 5.0 ppb F
Soil (limed) with and
without F added
Soil (unllmed) with
and without F added
Exposed to 1.5 ppb F
Exposed to 5.0 ppb F
Exposed to 10.0 ppb F
Tissue
sampled
Needles
Needles
Needles
Leaves

Leaves

Leaves
Leaves

Leaves
Leaves
Leaves
Whole leaves


Leaves
Leaves
Leaves
Leaves


Leaves

Leaves

Needles
Leaves

Leaves

Needles
Needles
Needles
Fluoride concentration in dry matter (ppm)a
Sample description _
intermediate
Not specified
Not specified
Not specified
Mature (washed)

Mature (unwashed)

Not specified 7.00-10.00
Not specified 7.00-10.00

Not specified
Not specified
Not specified
Washed 2.00-28.00


Not specified
Not specified
Not specified
From industrial and 2.00-8.00
nonlndustrial
areas (washed)
Unwashed

Washed

Not specified
Not specified 3.00-3.20

Not specified 3.70-37.00

Not specified
Not specified
Not specified
_. . Showing toxicity
nigh range
symptoms
43.00-71.00
41.00-155.00
140.00
149.00-275.00

279.00-284.00

30.00-50.00
20.00-141.00

37.00-59.00
44.00-46.00
57.00
129.00-733.00


51.00-117.00
84.00-138.00
122.00
12.00-27.00 22.00-462.00


336.00

168.00

133.00
18.00-45.00

20.60-96.00 96.00-262.00

53.00-62.00
73.00-147.00
106.00
                                                                                          K
                                                                                          Ul

-------
                              TABLE 4.6  (continued)
Plant
Lilac (Syringa vulgarie)


Locust, black (ftcbinia
paeudoaaaoia)

Haple (Acer spp.)


Marigold (Tagatea spp.)

Mountain laurel (Kalmia
latifolid)

Mulberry (Home spp.)

Nasturtium (Tropaeolum
spp.)
Parsnip (Paatinaaa gatira)


Peach (Prumca persied)













Type of culture
Exposed to 1.5 ppb F
Exposed to 5.0 ppb F
Exposed to 10.0 ppb F
Exposed to 1.5 ppb F
Exposed to 5.0 ppb F
Exposed to 10.0 ppb F
Exposed to 1.5 ppb F
Exposed to 5.0 ppb F
Exposed to 10.0 ppb F
Grown in soil to
which NaF was added
Exposed to 1.5 ppb F
Exposed to 5.0 ppb F
Exposed to 10.0 ppb F
Exposed to 1.5 ppb F
Exposed to 5.0 ppb F
Grown in soil to
which NaF was added
Exposed to 1.5 ppb F
Exposed to 5.0 ppb F
Exposed to 10.0 ppb F
Before and after
exposure to RF gas
Exposed to HF gas
Grown in soil to
which NaF was added
Exposed to 1.5 ppb F
Exposed to 5.0 ppb F
Exposed to 10.0 ppb F
Near Al reduction
plant



Near Al reduction
Tissue
sampled
Leaves
Leaves
Leaves
Leaves
Leaves
Leaves
Leaves
Leaves
Leaves
Leaves

Leaves
Leaves
Leaves
Leaves
Leaves
Leaves

Leaves
Leaves
Leaves
Leaves

Leaves
Leaves

Leaves
Leaves
Leaves
Leaves




Fruit peel
Fluoride concentration In dry matter (ppm)a
Sample description
Not specified
Not specified
Not specified
Not specified
Not specified
Not specified
Not specified
Not specified
Not specified
Not specified

Not specified
Not specified
Not specified
Not specified
Not specified
Not specified

Not specified
Not specified
Not specified
Not specified

Not specified
Not specified

Not specified
Not specified
Not specified
Not specified




Not specified
intermediate Hlgh ^


123.00
113.00
153.00
80.00
80.00
209.00
129.00
200.00-600.00

34.00-35.00
21.00-42.00
58.00
129.00
128.00-144.00
42.00-60.00

177.00-218.00
146.00-470.00
208.00
6.00-16.00 30.00

6.00-15.00
6.00




2.00-8.00




2.00-5.00
Showing toxicity
symptoms
123.00
216.00












122.00-273.00
213.00




172.00
77.00-390.00

30.00-50.00
220.00-1442.00

54.00-92.00
89.00-101.00
94.00
44.00-112.00
(fruit was
damaged but
leaves were
not)
19.00-34.00
                                                                                                                        I-1
                                                                                                                        N>
plant

-------
TABLE 4.6 (continued)
Plant
Pepper (Capsicum spp.)


Petunia (Petunia spp.)




Pine (Pinua ponderoea and
other species)













Pine, eastern white (Pinua
etfobus)

Potato (Solomon tvberoaum)



Prune (Pmana domeetiaa)








Type of culture
Exposed to 1.5 ppb F
Exposed to 5.0 ppb F
Exposed to 10.0 ppb F
Grown in soil to
which NaF was added
Exposed to 1.5 ppb F
Exposed to 5.0 ppb F
Exposed to 10.0 ppb F
Field
Field
Field
Exposed to 1.5 ppb F
Exposed to 5.0 ppb F
Exposed to 10.0 ppb F
Near Al reduction
plant
Near Al reduction
plant
Near Al reduction
plant
Exposed to 1.5 ppb F
Exposed to 5.0 ppb F
Exposed to 10.0 ppb F
Exposed to 1.5 ppb F
Exposed to 5.0 ppb F
Exposed to 10.0 ppb F
Exposed to 0.0 and
and 3.0 ppb as HF
Exposed to 0.0 and
and 3.0 ppb as HF
Near fluoride-
emitting factory
Near Al plants and
90 miles away
Near Al plants and
90 miles away
Exposed to 1.5 ppb F
Exposed to 5.0 ppb F
Exposed to 10.0 ppb F
Tissue
sampled
Leaves
Leaves
Leaves
Leaves

Leaves
Leaves
Leaves
Needles
Needles
Needles
Needles
Needles
Needles
Needles

Needles

Needles

Needles
Needles
Needles
Needles
Needles
Needles
Leaves

Tubers

Leaves

Leaves

Twigs

Leaves
Leaves
Leaves
Fluoride concentration in dry matter (ppm)a
Sample description
Not specified
Not specified
Not specified
Not specified

Not specified
Not specified
Not specified
Young
1 year old
2 years old
Not specified
Not specified
Not specified
Partially expanded

Newly expanded

Expanded 3 months

Not specified
Not specified
Not specified
Not specified
Not specified
Not specified
Washed

Washed

Not specified

Not specified

Not specified

Not specified
Not specified
Not specified
intermediate Hlgh range


154.00
200.00-600.00

66.00-84.00
273.00-362.00
148.00
2.00-3.00
2.00-3.00
3.00-4.00
26.00
32.00
106.00






19.00-46.00


70.00-136.00
138.00
67.00
19.00-27.00 163.00-267.00

4.00-17.00 10.00-34.00

9.00-20.00 43.00

6.00-15.00 25.00

0.70-1.00




Showing toxiclty
symptoms
136.00-449.00
203.00
244.0





129.00
229.00-330.00
462.00
39.00
55.00-73.00
70.00
15.00-20.00

30.00-35.00

80.00

83.00
54.00-72.00
80.00

73.00
41.00




121.00-496.00

30.00-1400.00

2.20-17.00

42.00-64.00
60.00-90.00
107.00
                                                                                         to

-------
TABLE 4.6 (continued)
Plant
Raspberry (Rubua spp.)


Rhododendron (Rhododendron
spp.)

Rose (Rosa spp.)











Spanish moss (Tillandela
luneoidge)

Spinach (Spinaoia aleraoea)

Spruce, Engelnann (Pieoa
6ngBUficovti)

Squash (Cuaufbita spp.)


Sweet pea (LattyruB
odoKttua)

Sweet potato (Tpomoea
batatas)

Type of culture
Exposed to 1.5 ppb F
Exposed to 5.0 ppb F
Exposed to 10.0 ppb F
Exposed to 1 , 5 ppb F
Exposed to 5.0 ppb F
Exposed to 10.0 ppb F
Exposed to 1.5 ppb F
Exposed to 5.0 ppb F
Exposed to 10.0 ppb F
Exposed to 0.0 and
3.0 ppb F for 6
months
Exposed to 0.0 and
3.0 ppb F for 6
months
Exposed to 0.0 and
3.0 ppb F for 6
months
Exposed In areas
where air was
contaminated with F
Grown In soil to
which MaF was added
Exposed to 1.5 ppb F
Exposed to 5.0 ppb F
Exposed to 10.0 ppb F
Exposed to 1.5 ppb F
Exposed to 5.0 ppb F
Exposed to 10.0 ppb F
Exposed to 1.5 ppb F
Exposed to 5.0 ppb F
Exposed to 10.0 ppb F
Exposed to 0.0 and
3.0 ppb F as HF in
atmosphere
Tissue
sampled
Leaves
Leaves
Leaves
Leaves
Leaves
Leaves
Leaves
Leaves
Leaves
Leaves


Branches


Flowers


Whole plant


Leaves

Needles
Needles
Needles
Leaves
Leaves
Leaves
Leaves
Leaves
Leaves
Leaves


Fluoride concentration in dry matter (ppm)a
Sample description
Not specified
Not specified
Not specified
Not specified
Not specified
Not specified
Not specified
Not specified
Not specified
Mature (washed)


Mixed, young and
old (washed)

Mature (rinsed)


Unwashed


Not specified

Not specified
Not specified
Not specified
Not specified
Not specified
Not specified
Not specified
Not specified
Not specified
Washed


intermediate Hlgh rjmge

104.00-176.00

44.00-55.00

30.00
80.00-120.00
64.00-244.00
175.00
4.00-8.00


3.00-5.00 24.00


4.00 13.00


22.00-27.00 32.00-2418.00


49.00 200.00-600.00

80.00
31.00
149.00
114.00
85.00
99.00

118.00-144.00

8.00-25.00


Showing toxicity
symptoms
88.00-243.00
216.00
162.00

85.00




118.00-323.00











803.00-857.00

57.00
210.00-245.00


134.00
179.00
327.00
148.00
141.00



                                                                                         00

-------
                                                             TABLE 4.6 (continued)
Plant



Tomato (Lyaopevaiaon
eeaul«ntvm)








•


Willow (Salix spp.)


Type of culture
Exposed to 0.0 and
3.0 ppb F as HF In
atmosphere
Before and after
exposure to HF gas
Before and after
exposure to HF gas
Grown In soil to
which NaF was added
Exposed to 1.5 ppb F
Exposed to 5.0 ppb F
Exposed to 10.0 ppb F
Exposed to 10.0 ppb F
as HF In greenhouse
Exposed to 10.0 ppb F
as HF In greenhouse
Exposed to 1.5 ppb F
Exposed to 5.0 ppb F
Exposed to 10.0 ppb F
Tissue
sampled
Tubers


Leaves

Fruit

Leaves

Leaves
Leaves
Leaves
Leaves

Leaves

Leaves
Leaves
Leaves
Fluoride concentration in dry matter (ppa)a
Sample description
Washed


Not specified

Not specified

Not specified

Not specified
Not specified
Not specified
New (washed)

Old (washed)

Not specified
Not specified
Not specified
Intermediate
range6
3.10


28.00-54.00

6.00

10.00-14.00




3.00-25.00

5.00-36.00




High range Showln* «=°^clty
• ** symptoms
91.00-146.00 220.00-319.00


289.00-780.00



26.00-82.00 277.00-2179.00

231.00-247.00
123.00-291.00 278.00
171.00 207.00


241.00 294.00-1365.00

65.00-144.00
98.00-271.00
270.00
     ?There were no values showing deficiency symptoms or low ranges.
      Data derived from fumigation experiments are values found when no fluorine was present In the air.  Otherwise, data in this column are
from culture controls or nonindustrial areas.
     "Refers to concentration of fluorine as hydrogen fluoride Introduced into greenhouse fumigation chambers.

     Source:  Adapted from Brewer, 1966, Table 1, pp. 184-194.  Data collected from several sources.  Reprinted by permission of the publisher.
                                                                                                                                                     I-*
                                                                                                                                                     10
                                                                                                                                                     vo

-------
                                130
  600


  400


  200
a   °
                                              ORNL- DWG 79-20891
  400
O
   200
OC
O
3   °
"" 600
  400
   200
                VALENCIA
                HAMLIN
                MARSH SEEDLESS
             PINEAPPLE
             TEMPLE
                                          Ml,,
               JUk
             TANGELO
        844281 4218.52.51.5
        4844181 24.5 81422
       3232 168884 444 4222 1
 844281 424 8.5 2.51.5
 48441 81  24.5 81422
3232168 88444442221 ppm hr
                                                              ppm
                                                              hr
     Figure 4.2.   Fluorine content of washed  (solid) and unwashed
(shaded) leaves of six citrus varieties as affected by gaseous hydrogen
fluoride exposure.  Source:  Adapted from Maclean et al., 1968, Figure
2, p.  448.  Reprinted by permission of the publisher.

-------
                                 131
                                               ORNL-DWG 79-20890
   600
   400
   200
 a.
 a.
   1200
UJ
8
   800
E  400
o
   1500


   1000


   500


     0
                IXORA
                MELALEUCA
                HIBISCUS
1
MUlJki
                             CARISSA
                             CROTON
                          Illlhl,
                             AZALEA
I
J
tfiJiJi-
• IIIIIIIIIIIIHIIIJIIIrfldlJlJi I •IIIIIIIIIIIIHIIIIIIItfui j
844281 421 8.5 2.51.5 844281421 8.5 2.5 1.~
484418 124.5 81422 48441 8124.5 81422
 I 321  88844444222 1  |32|888444442221
32  16                    32  16
                          E
                          Q.
                          Q.
                                                    600
                                                        UJ
                                     400 §
                                         o
                                         LJ
                                     200 1
                                         o
                                                              ppm
                                                              hr
                                                              ppm hr
     Figure  4.3.  Fluorine content of washed (solid)  and  unwashed
(shaded)  leaves of six ornamental species as affected by  gaseous hydrogen
fluoride  exposure.  Source:   Adapted from MacLean et  al.,  1968, Figure
3, p. 448.   Reprinted by permission of the publisher.

-------
                          TABLE 4.7.  TREATMENTS AND TISSUE FLUORIDE CONCENTRATIONS FOR BEAN EXPERIMENTS
Bean
variety
RK
RK
RK
PPW
TC
FCL
TG
RK
TG
TG
PPW
RK
TG
TC
PPW
RK
TG
TG
TG
TG
TG
TG
Nutrient.
solution
S
S
S
S
S
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
S
L
S
S
S
Day
length
(hr)
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
13
14
16
10
16
Days
exposed
to HF
7
7
7
9
14
7
69
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
82
92
84
92
74
Average HF
concentration
Pg F/m8
4.8
5.3
8.0
8.0
7.8
4.5
5.4
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
6.6
6.6
6.6
6.6
13.9
13.9
10.5
9.1
2.1
0.60
0.58
F content of plant tissue
When
exposed
A
E
B
BE
BE
BE
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
Leaflets
Control
3.2
1.1
2.7
1.2
2.5
3.0
3.5
1.0
1.5
1.0
0.3
0.3
0.3
0
1.0
3.6
2.4
4.5
4.5
3.0
4.0
3.5
HF
160d
120*
270
180
330j
52
880
260
260
340
220
710
700
710
540
1670
1220
690
775
140
54
49
Stems,
Control
0.3
0
0.2
0.6
0.7
2.0
1.7
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1.4
1.8
1.5
0.8
0.5
1.5
0.9
petioles
HF
2.4*
2.0*
26
12
20 d
3.3d
39
8.3
10
24
19
25
29
26
31
59
49 ,
28*
30
14
3.0
2.5
(ppm)

Fruit
Control
0.1
0.2
0
0.3
0.2
2.1
0.9
0.7
0.3
0.5
0.3
0
0
0
0
2.4
2.2
0
0.5e
0
0
Qe
HF
4 Ud
o'.7d
/J
0.6*
0.3*
3.1*
33
4.2
13
21
21
29
46
47
34
66
80,
13 '
20e
14e
4.0e
3.6e
     rRK — red kidney; PPW — pencil pod wax; TC — tendercrop; TG — tendergreen;  FCL — fordhook concentrated  lima.
      S — standard nutrient solution containing 200 ppm Ca; L — low Ca nutrient  solution containing 40 ppm Ca.
      A — directly after flowering; E — during early flowering; B — directly before flowering;  BE — beginning before  flowering and
extending into early flowering; C — continuously, from seeding to harvest.
     "Samples for F analysis collected some time after HF treatment, when plants were harvested.  All other  F analyses of  fumigated
plants apply to samples collected at end of HF treatment.
     ^Mature seed only.

     Source:  Adapted from Pack, 1971b, Table I, p. 1129.  Reprinted by permission of the publisher.
                                                                                                                                        to

-------
                                   133
(Less et al., 1975).  Gaseous hydrogen fluoride was more  easily  absorbed
than particulate matter, and absorption was greater during wet cool
weather (Figure 4.4).
                                                ORNL-DWG 79-20889
                       I        I
                     HF (WINTER)
        I
                        HF (SUMMER, RAIN)
                          HF (SUMMER)
                                          SUBMICRON PARTICULATE
                                          FLUORIDE (SUMMER)
                               10
20
25
30
                    MEAN CONCENTRATION OF FLUORIDE IN AIR (pg/md)
     Figure 4.4.  Comparison of uptake by grass of  fluoride  from hydrogen
fluoride and from submicron particulate  fluoride.   Source:   Adapted from
Less et al., 1975, Figure  8, p. 159.  Reprinted by  permission  of the
publisher.
     Continuous exposure to fluoride is more harmful to plants  than  inter-
mittent exposure.  For example, the intermittent spraying of  citrus  with
either sodium fluoride or hydrogen fluoride was less injurious  than  con-
tinuous exposure to gaseous hydrogen fluoride.  With intermittent  exposure
there is a chance for the absorbed fluoride to be "chemically fixed" be-
tween exposures, whereas there is no "rest period" with continuous exposure
(Brewer, Sutherland, and Guillemet, 1969; Chang, 1975).  Toxicity  symptoms
were the same with either treatment.  Fluoride accumulation in  foliage  of
timothy (Fhleum pvatense L.) and red clover (.Trifolium pratense L.)  was
greater with continuous exposure (10 days, 2.3 and 5.0 yg of  fluoride per
cubic meter) than with intermittent exposures (same concentrations,  2-day
exposure to fluoride alternated with a 2-day exposure to filtered  ambient
air; total fluoride exposure time was 10 days) (Figure 4.5) (MacLean and
Schneider, 1973).  However, intermittent exposure yielded larger fluoride
accumulation when total time was held constant and fumigant concentration
was increased (MacLean, Schneider, and Weinstein, 1969).  In  all cases,
plants were exposed to the same dose (defined as the product  of fumigation
concentration and the days of fumigation).  The data illustrate the  diffi-
culty in predicting fluoride accumulation in field crops when only the

-------
                                   134
            60
                                               ORNL-DWG 79-20888
         o>
         5  40
         IU
         to
         O
         o
         u.
         u
         >  20
         o
             0
           200
                                                        I
          Q.
          0.
         u
         o
                                   10        15
                                   TIME (days)
20
     Figure 4.5.  Fluoride accumulation in mixed planting  of  timothy  and
red clover with intermittent  (solid symbols) and continuous  (open symbols)
fumigations.  Source:  Adapted from MacLean and Schneider, 1973,  JOURNAL
OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, Volume 2, page 501, by permission of  the American
Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America  and Soil Science
Society of America.
average air concentration is known.  In field situations, airborne  fluoride
concentrations and duration of exposure vary.  Moreover, rain  leaches  flu-
oride from vegetation.  Volatilization of organofluorides may  also  occur
(Section 4.2.5).  Exposure times and concentrations required to  produce
injury symptoms for several species are presented  in  Section 4.3.2.
4.2.4.2  Concentration in Plants Near ...Pollution Sources — Proximity to a
fluoride pollution source usually increases  the plant  fluoride content.

-------
                                   135


Plants growing in the vicinity of a phosphorus extraction facility at
Silverbow, Montana, contained much higher fluoride contents than control
area plants (van Hook, 1974).  Bluebunch wheatgrass contained average
concentrations of 200 to 350 ppm fluoride in areas adjacent to the indus-
try, while concentrations decreased to less than 50 ppm 1 to 2 miles away.
Similarly, concentrations in juniper decreased from about 400 to 20 ppm
fluoride.  The rate of change in tissue fluoride concentrations with dis-
tance from the pollution source depended on the prevailing air currents.

     Table 4.8 shows fluoride content of grasses, herbs, shrubs, and
conifers found on plots surrounding the Anaconda Aluminum Company smelter
in northwestern Montana (Carlson, 1973).  Correlation of fluoride content
with an index of injury implicated fluoride as the cause of injury.  Fluo-
ride concentrations in the lichen Parmelia eulaata decreased with distance
from an aluminum factory; concentrations were about 900 ppm at 1 km, 870
ppm at 4 km, 500 ppm at 8 km, 340 ppm at 9 km, and 120 ppm at 15 km
(LeBlanc, Rao, and Comeau, 1972).  Fluoride levels increased significantly
in Spanish moss placed in areas of known fluoride air pollution.  Fluoride
concentrations increased with exposure time and were indicative of the
proximity of fluoride sources.  The highest concentration detected was
2418 ppm, an increase from an initial concentration of 27 ppm.  However,
fluoride levels in the moss fluctuated with rainfall.  A collection from
the site that contained 2418 ppm was decreased to 1760 ppm after a rain-
fall of 2.89 in. (Maclntire, Hardin, and Hester, 1952).  Ivos et al. (1970)
reported high fluoride concentrations in plants near aluminum factories
in Lozovac and Razine, Yugoslavia.  Pine needles contained as much as
1806 ppm fluoride and "dusty" oleander leaves, 2747 ppm fluoride.

4.2.4.3  Subcellular Distribution — The subcellular distribution of
fluorine-18 and fluorine-19 in tomato leaves after long and short fumiga-
tion exposures is presented in Table 4.9.  Cell walls, chloroplasts, and
soluble proteins contained the largest quantities of label.  Chang and
Thompson (1965) obtained similar results in cellular fractions from fumi-
gated citrus leaves; however, because of cross contamination in organelle
separation and preparation, they reasoned that accumulation was greatest
in the chloroplasts, less in the cell-wall-nuclei fraction, and least in
the mitochondria fraction.  Some 60% of the fluoride was in the supernat-
ant, rather than the organelle, fraction.

4.2.5  Bioelimination

     There are few data on fluoride elimination from plant materials.
Evidence for volatile organofluorides in homogenates of several plant
species has been presented, but whether any loss of volatile fluorides
occurs in vivo is unknown (Peters and Shorthouse, 1967).  Monofluoroace-
tone was identified as the volatile fluoride lost from homogenates of A.
georginae, but since it accounted for only about 13% of the total fluo-
ride lost, other volatile compounds must exist (Peters and Shorthouse,
1971).  Washing leaves of plants with distilled water can remove signif-
icant amounts of fluoride from plants previously exposed to either atmos-
pheric fluoride or soil fluoride (Section 4.2.1.2) (Jacobsen et al., 1966).
In the former case, the water probably removes airborne pollutants that

-------
         TABLE 4.8.  CONCENTRATIONS OF FLUORIDE IN PLANTS NEAR THE ANACONDA ALUMINUM COMPANY
                                    SMELTER IN NORTHWEST MONTANA
Average fluoride content (ppm dry wt)
Plot No.a
Control No. 1-6
R1-P1-7
R2-P1-7
R3-P1-7
R4-P1-10
R5-P1-10
R6-P1-10
R7-P1-7
R8-P1-7
R9-P1-7
R10-P1-7
Shrubs
4. 77-11. 4&
3-108.5
3.6-112.7
10-1166.6
8-778
11.05-1719
7.5-1125.3
4.8-1073
11.8-399.8
5.6-108.7
6.8-76.5
Conifers
1969
3.5-10
5.8-300
5.5-143.5
7-637
8.93-681.5
10.1-341
13.5-1950
10-168
14.2-119.8
7.8-110
9.2-133
1970
3-11
9-40.8
2.3-20
8-229
4-116.5
4.1-68.6
6-33
4.5-22.3
9.2-175
10-39.5
3.5-42.5
Herbs
5-12
12.5-188
5.5-93.8
3.3-875.5
5.7-628
8.28-1038
11-431
7-600
13.3-235
6.5-51.5
10-45
Grasses
1.3-16
2.5-70
2.5-83.3
2.1-775
5.8-234
5.5-600
24.5-581
20.5-338
8-110
5-41
6.5-38.5
Grand
average
4.79-10.36
6.8-122.36
3.7-91.21
8.2-1004.3
6.88-604.14
7.46-1181.5
11.75-877.6
10.87-871.7
12.6-409.8
7.72-70.97
7.54-66.3
     ?R — radius; P — plot.
      Samples were on transects radiating from the smelter.  These values represent the range of
fluoride concentrations found in all plots on the radius.  Lower values were associated with plots
distal from the fluoride source.

     Source:  Adapted from Carlson, 1973, Table la, p.  131.  Reprinted by permission of the publisher.

-------
                                    137
                    TABLE 4.9.  DISTRIBUTION OF '*F AND "F IN VARIOUS
                      CELLULAR CONSTITUENTS OF TOMATO LEAVES TREATED
                        THROUGH THE AERIAL PORTIONS OF THE PLANT
"F after 2-hr

Cellular
constituent

"F at the
end of 10-day
fumigation
(ppn dry wt)
fumigation
(counts rain'1
dry wt)



»g"



Nonvashed Washed
Cell walls
Chloroplasts
Mitochondria
Microaomes
Soluble proteins
Supernatant
168S
693
99
21
371

142
176
78

592
82*
155
145
34

662
37°
                      the concentration of "F is expressed for this
                  fraction in counts mln"1 mg~* of fresh leaf tissue.
                      Source: Adapted from Ledbetter, Mavrodineanu, and
                  Weiss, 1960, Table V, p. 346.  Reprinted by permission
                  of the publisher.
have settled on the leaves and any  surface-extruded fluorides.   The latter
case implies that some of the fluoride that has been translocated to the
leaf may  eventually be deposited on the surface of the leaf and,  thus,
easily removed by brief water washings.  Therefore, rainfall may be ex-
pected to remove a portion of the fluoride from the crown portion of the
plant.

     Loss of fluoride in plants also occurs through the seasonal loss of
leaves, twigs, and roots.  Hitchcock et al. (1971) suggested that the post-
fumigation loss of fluoride from alfalfa plants was due mainly  to leaf
abscission and "weathering."  Growth dilution (biomass added after fumiga-
tion) also leads to a decrease in tissue concentration of fluoride, but
it is not an elimination mechanism.   Weinstein (1961) observed  a signifi-
cant decrease in fluoride content of stem and leaf tissue from  bean and
tomato during a postfumigation period.  The reason for this decrease could
not be explained, but it was not due to growth dilution.

4.3  EFFECTS

     Fluorides affect plants through chemical interactions that occur once
the plant has taken up a quantity of fluoride.  These effects can occur at
various levels of organization, and ultimately all effects should be expli-
cable in  molecular terms.  Table 4.10 summarizes some of the effects of
fluoride  observed at different levels of organization.

     Fluorinated analogues of a variety of natural constituents have been
used as inhibitors in numerous biological and biochemical studies.   For
example,  fluorophenylalanine is an  analogue of the amino acid phenylala-
nine; incorporation of this analogue into enzymes often results in reduced
enzymatic activity.  Since few data exist on the natural occurrence of
formation of these analogues when plants are exposed to fluorides,  their

-------
                                     138
              TABLE 4.10.  NATURE OF FLUORIDE-INDUCED EFFECTS IN PLANTS
                  AT DIFFERENT LEVELS OF BIOLOGICAL ORGANIZATION
       Cell
  Tissue or organ
   Organism
     Ecosystem
Altered cell milieu?
Effects on enzymes
  and metabolites
Modification of cell
  organelles and
  metabolism

Pathway disruption
Cellular modification
Disruption and death
  of cell
Decreased
  assimilation
Altered respiration

Altered growth and
  development


Chlorotic lesions
Necrotic lesions

Death or abscission
  of leaf
Modified growth
Reduced
  reproduction
Decreased fitness
  for environment
Death of plant
Increased  fluoride
  in ecosystem


Increase in fluoride
  burden of animals


Fluorosis  in animals
Change in plant
  community
Desolation
     Source:  Adapted from Weinstein and McCune, 1971, Table 1, p. 411. Reprinted by
permission of the publisher.
effects are not discussed in this section.   An exception  is fluorocitrate,
which can be formed  from fluoroacetate.   Production of fluorocitrate and
fluoroacetate is discussed in Section  4.2.3.

4.3.1  Metabolic Effects

4.3.1.1  Photosynthesis  — Although inhibition of photosynthesis by fluo-
ride  is well documented  (Bennett and Hill,  1974; Chang, 1975;  Thomas and
Alther, 1966), the mechanisms by which it occurs have not been unequivo-
cally determined.  Suggested mechanisms  include enzymatic inhibitions,
loss  of subcellular  organization, and  granulation of chloroplasts.  Photo-
synthesis in sensitive plants (e.g., gladiolus and apricot) can be inhib-
ited  by a few parts-per-billion fluoride, whereas more resistant plants
may require several  hundred parts-per-billion fluoride to attain similar
results.

      Chlorosis is a  common effect of exposure to fluorides (Chang, 1975).
Newman (as cited in  Wallis et al., 1974)  found that fluoride decreased the
chlorophyll content  of bush bean leaves  and suggested that fluoride inhib-
its photosynthesis by affecting chlorophyll synthesis.  Both fluoride and
chloride at 0.1 vM to 10 mW inhibited  the in vivo production of chlorophyll
and pheophytin a from 1*C-6-aminolevulinic acid (ALA) in  tobacco leaf discs
(Wallis et al., 1974).   Fumigation with  12.4 ppb hydrogen fluoride for
nine  days slightly decreased chlorophyll a and chlorophyll b contents of
tomato and bean leaves,  although recovery occurred in the postfumigation
period (Weinstein, 1961).

      Potassium fluoride  (35 mftf) inhibited oxygen evolution (Hill reaction)
at pH 4.8 to 5.7 in  isolated chloroplasts from bush beans (Ballantyne,

-------
                                     139
1972).   Inhibition was overcome by increasing the pH above  5.6 and inject-
ing magnesium and potassium salts into a  chloroplast preparation.  Inhibi-
tion did not occur with  monofluoroacetate.   The threshold for inhibition
was 2 mV fluoride.  Other examples of the fluoride inhibition of the Hill
reaction are given in Chang (1975).

     Apparent photosynthesis in barley and  alfalfa was inhibited about  5%
with 2-hr hydrogen fluoride exposures at  40 ppb fluoride and about 40%  at
200 ppb  fluoride  (Bennett and Hill, 1973).   Below about 150 ppb no detect-
able tissue necrosis occurred.  At 40 and 100 ppb fluoride, carbon dioxide
uptake decreased over the 2-hr fumigation period; recovery  occurred after
the end  of the fumigation period, and near  normal rates were observed the
next day.   At equivalent concentrations,  inhibition of photosynthesis by
hydrogen fluoride was 2  times as effective  as ozone or chlorine, 4 times as
effective as sulfur dioxide, 25 times as  effective as nitrogen dioxide, and
40 times as effective as nitric oxide.  Photosynthesis in detached leaves
of three pine and six hardwood species was  inhibited significantly when
placed in 1 mW to 10 mW  sodium fluoride solutions for 24 hr (Mclaughlin and
Barnes,  1975).  Table 4.11 shows the decrease in apparent photosynthesis
observed after exposure  of samples collected on the given dates.  In gen-
eral, pines were more sensitive than hardwoods, and new needles more sen-
sitive than old.  Inglis and Hill (1974)  observed that a 24-hr exposure to
50 mW fluoride almost completely inhibited  carbon dioxide fixation (photo-
synthesis) in three moss species.  At 25  mAf fluoride, inhibition was 1% in
Tovtula  muralie,  72% in  Hypnum cupressiforme, and 90% in Brywn argenteum.
     TABLE 4.11.  SEASONAL EFFECTS OF FLUORIDE (1 mtf NaP) ON PHOTOSYNTHESIS AND RESPIRATION OF FOLIAGE FROM
                      THREE SPECIES OF PINES AND SIX SPECIES OF HARDWOOD
    Species
                                      Change from control (!)
                      Apparent photosynthesis*
Dark respiration"
                                             Pines


Loblolly pine
New needles
One-year needles
White pine
New needlea
One-year needles
Shortleaf pine
One-year needles
28
May

ND
-44

-86
-100

-80
9
June

-67
-40

-100
-89

-90
23
June

-79
-30

-85
-55

-33
7
July

-85
-75

-79
-59

-94
21
July

-69
-50

-71
-52

-57
7
Aug.

-45
-54

-74
-46

-60
28
May

+8
+20

-27
+21

+41
9
June

+8
+10

-36
+40

+13
23 7
June July

-9 -9
0 +38

+30 +33
+43 +67

+75 +15
21
July

0
+20

+100
+109

+67
7
Aug.

+18
+55

+50
+136

+23
Hardwoods


Red maple
Sycamore
Yellow poplar
Red gun
Dogwood
Sourwood
3
June
+22
-17
-81
0
-27
-83
17
June
-85
-18
-30
ND°
-16
+29
1
July
-66
-48
-30
-12
-35
-50








15
July
-47
+1
-38
-31
-7
-3
29
July
-57
-11
-80
-22
-9
-55
3
June
+14
+19
+21
+5
+5
-6
17
June
-13
+22
+71
ND°
+22
+48
1
July
+43
+2
+49
+28
+15
-34
IS
July
+51
+29
+47
+52
+22
+5
29
July
+44
+16
+110
+53
+5
+10
    Samples were collected at the dates listed and lanersed In fluoride solutions for 24 hr.  Measurements were
performed after this exposure.
    Source:  Adapted from McLaughlln and Barnes, 1975, Table 2, p. 95.  Reprinted by permission of the publisher.

-------
                                   140
     A summary of the study by  Bennett  and  Hill (1974)  of the inhibition
of photosynthesis by several  air pollutants is  shown in Figure 4.6.   The
relative order of inhibition  of equal concentrations of these pollutants
for barley and oats is HF  > C12 ^  03 >  S0a  > N02  >  NO.   Although hydrogen
fluoride can also induce stomatal  closure and thus  restrict carbon dioxide
entry, inhibition of biochemical processes  within the leaf is thought to
be the major inhibitory mode.   Recovery from hydrogen fluoride exposure
occurs but is slower than  that  from other pollutants.   Hill (1969) reported
that a 24-hr average concentration of 48 ppb caused a 50% reduction of
photosynthesis in strawberries; complete recovery required three weeks.
                                                 ORNL-DWG 79-20899
           100
         £  75
         z
         o
         ffi
                              UJ
< z
I?
                              o
-100

 80

   4

 100

 80

 60
               _HF CI2
^X^

NO
"FUMIGATION
^ I
^^^O% .»•••••***
f V* ,fl%**** ^^
RECOVERY
I <
                                                2     3
                                             TIME (hr)
                             100             200
                              CONCENTRATION (pphm)
                               300
     Figure 4.6.  Inhibition of apparent photosynthetic rates of barley
and oat canopies by 2-hr air pollution fumigations.  Source:  Adapted from
Bennett and Hill, 1974, Figure 1, p. 118, in Air Pollution Effects on
Plant Growth.  Reprinted by permission of the publisher.
     Although fluoride can inhibit photosynthesis in  the  field,  it  is
difficult to determine if ambient fluoride  levels are responsible for  the
observed damage.  Ambient air pollution in  the Los Angeles  Basin reduced
transpiration and apparent photosynthesis of lemon and navel  orange trees.
However, atmospheric levels of fluoride (averages of  about  0.32  to  0.77
Vg/ta3) were apparently not responsible, since controlled  experiments
designed to simulate ambient conditions failed to detect  significant
decreases in transpiration and photosynthesis (Thompson et  al.,  1967).

-------
                                    141


     Inhibition of photosynthesis leading  to yield depression without the
formation of  chlorosis or necrosis has been termed hidden injury and is
discussed in  Section 4.3.3.3.

4.3.1.2  Respiration and Oxidative Processes — Many reports provide evi-
dence that exposure of plants to fluoride  alters  respiration (Chang, 1975).
Generally, low  concentrations stimulate respiration while higher concentra-
tions inhibit respiration.  The exact concentrations causing these effects
depend on the species, exposure period, age of the plant material, and con-
centration of fluoride in the sensitive part of the cell (Weinstein, 1961).
For example,  exposure of detached leaves of three pine species and six
hardwood species to 1 roM sodium fluoride increased respiration in most
cases (Mclaughlin and Barnes, 1975).  However, the extent of stimulation
varied considerably with species and with  the age of the leaf (Table
4.11).  Exposure of tomato and bean plants to fumigation with 1.6 ppb
hydrogen fluoride increased respiration 67% and 72%, respectively, over
control values  (Weinstein, 1961).  The data of Applegate, Adams, and
Carriker (1960)  (Table 4.12) showed that distinct inhibition of 02 uptake
by bush bean  seedlings infiltrated with fluoride  solutions occurred at
sodium fluoride concentrations of 10 wM or greater.   At the oldest devel-
opmental stage  examined (five days "of germination"), 0.1 wM sodium flu-
oride stimulated respiration.  Growing conditions (light or dark) and C02
concentration in the atmosphere in which 02 uptake was measured affected
the respiration rate.   In the fluoride-sensitive  plant Chenopodium morale
24- and 48-hr exposures of detached leaves to 1 tsM KF decreased respira-
tion, whereas in soybean, a fluoride-resistant species, similar exposure
           TABLE 4.12. THE Q0a RATIO (WATER INFILTRATED TO FLUORIDE INFILTRATED)
                      OF BEAN SEEDLINGS AT THREE GROWTH STAGES
Fluoride
concentration
in Infiltration
solution
(mW)
100



10



1



0.1



Light
or dark
germinated
Light

Dark

Light

Dark

Light

Dark

Light

Dark

C0a In
Warburg
flask
«)
0
0.6
0
0.6
0
0.6
0
0.6
0
0.6
0
0.6
0
0.6
0
0.6

Stage 1
1.539
1.784
1.625
2.420
1.049
1.254
1.118
1.287
1.048
1.168
1.116
1.199
1.047
1.164
1.146
1.196
QOj ratio**
Stage 2
2.089
3.188
2.779
3.428
1.209
1.921
1.454
1.910
0.941
1.327
1.111
1.469
0.903
0.918
1.015
1.122

Stage 3
1.459
3.406
1.769
2.214
1.085
1.912
1.253
1.299
0.920
0.994
0.944
1.007
0.703
0.789
0.829
0.818
              aQOs — microliters of Oa uptake per milligram dry weight.
              Source: Adapted from Applegate, Adams, and Carriker, 1960, Table 2,
            341. Reprinted by permission of the publisher.

-------
                                   142


slightly increased respiration  (Yu and Miller, 1967).  Except at one-day
exposures, younger leaves showed more fluoride-induced respiration than
older leaves.  They also showed the greatest inhibition after four to
five days of exposure.  In general, respiration was not inhibited until
visible necrotic injury was severe.  In Cetvaria islandicd (lichen), expo-
sure to 5 mM sodium fluoride increased respiration over a 5-hr exposure
period, but respiration decreased after a 24-hr exposure to 70% of control
(Vainshtein, 1973).  Higher concentrations were inhibitory over the whole
24-hr exposure period.

     Although the reason for fluoride-stimulated respiration is not known,
observations in Chlorella pyrenoidosa indicated that stimulation may be
related to the amount of undissociated hydrogen fluoride in the medium
(McNulty and Lords, 1960).  Higher concentrations of phosphorylated nucle-
otides occurred in fluoride-treated cells, and since respiration rate is
thought to be governed by the ADP levels  (or the ATP/ADP ratio), high ADP
levels might stimulate respiration.

     Dinitrophenol, an uncoupler of mitochondrial phosphorylation from
electron transport, increased the rate of respiration in fluoride-treated
soybean leaves to a lesser extent than in untreated tissues (Yu and
Miller, 1967).  This suggests that fluoride-induced respiration results
from increased utilization of ATP, providing higher ADP pools in the cell.
Heatherbell, Howard, and Wicken (1966) found that sodium fluoride slightly
decreased oxygen consumption and phosphorylation in mitochondria isolated
from etiolated pea seedlings.

     Leaf tissue isolated from soybean plants fumigated for 48 hr with
9 to 12 yg/m3 hydrogen fluoride showed increased respiration, mitochondrial
succinate oxidation with ATPase activity, and decreased mitochondrial phos-
phorylation (Miller and Miller, 1974).  After a 96-hr exposure, all the
above activities were less than control values.  Tightly coupled mitochon-
dria, isolated from etiolated soybean hypocotyl and then exposed to con-
centrations of from 0 to 67 wM potassium fluoride, showed no increase in
respiration when succinate, malate, or NADH was used as the substrate.
Exposure of hypocotyl tissue itself to 10 wM potassium fluoride produced
no stimulation in respiration.  The osmotic properties of corn shoot mito-
chondria treated with potassium fluoride suggested that fluoride altered
the permeability of the mitochondrial membranes.  The authors concluded
that fluoride may be acting at the membrane level, leading to an altered
mitochondrial metabolism.  The higher ATPase activity in fluoride-treated
green tissues would increase ADP concentration, thus stimulating respira-
tion.  At longer periods of exposure to fluoride, higher internal concen-
trations of fluoride would occur and could, therefore, inhibit respiratory
enzymes.

     Miller and Miller (1974) discussed evidence that fluoride inhibits a
variety of respiratory enzymes:  succinic, malic, and NADH dehydrogenases;
enolase; phosphoglucomutase; hexokinase; and ascorbic acid oxidase (Section
4.3.1.3).  Levels of several enzymes were examined in soybeans fumigated
with hydrogen fluoride.  Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase, cytochrome
oxidase, peroxidase, and catalase activities increased in the fumigated

-------
                                   143


leaves (Lee, Miller, and Welkie, 1966).  Exposure of isolated enzymes to
fluoride, however, showed glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase, cytochrome
oxidase, and catalase to be unaffected while peroxidase was inhibited.
There are no data on the turnover of  these enzymes in fluoride-treated
tissues.  Peroxidase and cytochrome oxidase activities determined by histo-
chemical procedures were highest in the phloem near the necrotic areas of
Pelargonium zonale leaves fumigated with hydrogen fluoride (Poovaiah and
Wiebe, 1971).  This study provides in vivo evidence to support the above
in vitro findings of Lee, Miller, and Welkie (1966).  However, observed
increased respiration is apparently not due to direct stimulation of enz-
ymatic activity.  The manner and site in which fluoride initiates injury
are unknown.

4.3.1.3  Carbohydrate Metabolism — Fluoride is known to inhibit glucose
catabolism in isolated plant tissues  (National Academy of Sciences, 1971).
The manner in which this occurs in vivo is unknown.  In vitro, fluoride
can inhibit enolase, the enzyme in the glycolysis pathway that converts
D-2-phosphoglyceric acid to phosphoenolpyruvic acid (Lehniger, 1975;
Miller, 1958).  Inhibition occurs through the formation of a magnesium
fluorophosphate complex.

     The use of the pentose phosphate pathway would bypass inhibition of
enolase and thus confer a selective advantage (increased fluoride resist-
ance) to varieties using this pathway to a larger extent.  Ross et al.
(1968) examined this possibility by studying the release of labeled carbon
dioxide from glucose containing 1AC in the 6 position (6-C02) and in the
1 position (1-C02).  These studies were made on leaf discs from varieties
of gladiolus that differed in their susceptibility to fluorides.  Although
there were considerable differences, varieties with increased resistance
to fluoride generally had lower 6-C02/l-COa ratios, suggesting that there
might be a correlation between resistance and the increased use of the
pentose phosphate pathway.  Multiple  correlation analysis showed that the
6-C02/l-C02 ratio accounted for 16% of the variation in leaf injury, flower
color accounted for 32%, and leaf area for 15%.

     While fluoride does inhibit growth, there is little proof that the
growth inhibitory mechanism is through enolase, because other enzymes are
also inhibited by fluoride.  Ordin and co-workers demonstrated fluoride
inhibition of the incorporation of X*C glucose into cellulose and other
components of the aqueous and acid-soluble cell wall fraction of oat cole-
optile (Ordin and Skoe, 1963).  From  studies using glucose labeled with
1I§C in several positions, they concluded that enolase was not inhibited
in vivo.

     In vitro, fluoride also inhibits phosphoglucomutase, the enzyme
converting glucose-6-phosphate to glucose-1-phosphate (Yang and Miller,
1963Z>).  Ordin and Alt man (1965) demonstrated that oat coleoptile phospho-
glucomutase was inhibited by fluoride in vitro and suggested that this was
"the major cause of fluoride-induced  inhibition of cellulose biosyntheses."
Later, however, glucose-6-phosphate and glucose-1-phosphate pools were
observed not to change with fluoride  treatment (Gordon and Ordin, 1972).
UDP-glucose pools did decrease after  fluoride treatment.  Thus inhibition

-------
                                   144


in this system appears not to be related to phosphoglucomutase inhibition
but to some other process that reduces incorporation of glucose into wall
materials.  Other researchers report that phosphoglucomutase is not inhib-
ited by fluoride.  De Moura, Le Tourneau, and Wiese (1973) found that
potato tuber phosphoglucomutase was relatively insensitive to fluoride
in vitro, and their preliminary data suggested that it also was not sus-
ceptible in vivo.  Fluoride at 0.5 wM and 1.25 mW does not inhibit corn
phosphoglucomutase in vitro, but at 0.5 mW and 1 mW it does inhibit corn
seedling root growth 20% and 40% respectively (Chang, 1968).  These stud-
ies provide further evidence that growth inhibition is not due to the in
vivo inhibition of phosphoglucomutase.

     Yang and Miller (1963a, 19632?) examined the metabolic effects of
fluoride fumigation on soybean plants.  After three- to five-day expo-
sures to 0.03 ppm hydrogen fluoride, the fluoride content in the leaves
was about 200 yg/g (on a fresh-weight basis).  Fumigated leaves contained
less sucrose and increased levels of reducing sugars and organic acids.
Respiration increased 30% and 100% above controls (Yang and Miller, 1963a).
Pipecolic acid accumulated in necrotic regions of the leaf.  These data
suggest that sucrose synthesis is inhibited by fluoride.  The four known
enzymes that convert glucose-6-phosphate to sucrose (phosphoglucomutase,
UDP-glucose pyrophosphorylase, UDP-glucose-fructose transglucosylase, and
UDP-glucose-fructose 6-phosphate transglucosylase) differ in vitro in their
sensitivity to fluoride (Yang and Miller, 1963i).  Soybean phosphoglucomu-
tase is very sensitive to fluoride, while UDP-glucose-fructose transglu-
cosylase is only slightly sensitive.  UDP-glucose pyrophosphorylase is
completely insensitive to fluoride.  Increased dark carbon dioxide fixa-
tion occurs in fluoride-treated leaves and may explain the elevated levels
of organic and amino acids found in necrotic leaves (Yang and Miller,
1963c).

     The metabolism of phosphorus compounds is intimately related to carbo-
hydrate metabolism.  Pack and Wilson (1967) cited references showing that
the enzymes enolase, phosphoglucomutase, phosphatases, and phosphorylases
(all concerned with phosphorus metabolism) are inhibited by fluorides.
They also showed, however, that levels of some 20 phosphorus metabolites
in bean seedlings are not altered by exposure to 14 yg of hydrogen fluoride
per cubic meter — exposure that produced no injury but produced 275 ppm
fluoride in tissue.  Thus, inhibition of enzymes concerned with acid-
soluble phosphorus compounds did not occur in vivo.

     McCune, Weinstein, and Mancini (1970) reported that there was "no
consistent effect on the levels or composition of acid-soluble nucleotides"
in fluoride-fumigated leaves of beans, tomatoes, and corn (4.8 to 10.7 yg
of fluoride per cubic meter, 4 to 12 days).  However, fumigated leaves did
show reduced incorporation of phosphorus-32 into nucleotides, possibly
because of decreased uptake of translocation of phosphorus.

     Phytase from germinating pea seeds was inhibited 80% with 1 wM fluo-
ride (Hauskrecht, 1972).  Phytase activity in seeds increased with germi-
nation, presumably supplying phosphate for activation of various processes.
Although conclusive experimental evidence is lacking, this may provide an

-------
                                   145


alternative explanation for inhibition of germination by fluoride.  Chang
(1973) also observed that fluoride  (0.1 vM to 10 mW) inhibited phytase
activity in vitro (13% to 54% inhibition respectively).

4.3.1.4  Effects of Fluoride on Ribosomes with RNA Metabolism — The growth
rate of corn seedlirig roots was decreased by treatment before germination
with 0.01 M sodium fluoride for 1.5 to 7 hr.  After exposure, the seeds
were washed with deionized distilled water, treated lightly with a fungi-
cide, then allowed to germinate and grow to a standard size of 12 ± 3 mm
in a moist chamber containing deionized distilled water.  Control seedling
roots grew 0.36 mm/hr, whereas treated seedling roots grew only 0.28 mm/hr
after 1.5-hr exposure, 0.24 mm/hr after 3-hr exposure, 0.20 mm/hr after
5-hr exposure, and 0.17 mm/hr after 7-hr exposure (Chang and Thompson,
1966).  The RNA content of the 3 mm root tips was directly correlated with
growth rates, but the DNA content was not.  Since the RNA content per cell
was correlated with the growth rate for different fluoride exposures, an
effect of fluoride on RNA metabolism was postulated.  Inhibition of both
cell elongation and cell division occurred.

     Fluoride-induced changes in acid-soluble nucleotides were observed
in roots produced from fluoride-treated corn seeds  (Chang, 1968).  The
triphosphate nucleotides increased  the most.  The base composition of RNA
was also altered by fluoride treatment.  Further studies showed that fluo-
ride reduced the amounts of both free and bound ribosomes (Chang, 1970a,
1970Z>)» and ribonuclease activity increased in plastids, mitochondria,
the soluble fraction, and to the greatest extent in microsomes.  A review
of some of the biochemical changes  in ribosomal metabolism and changes
in cellular RNA content that occur  during fluoride  inhibition of root
growth can be found in Chang (1973, 1975).

4.3.1.5  Fluorides and Calcium Nutrition — Some data suggest that fluoride
injury is due to a calcium deficiency caused by precipitation of calcium
as calcium fluoride.  Since the calcium content of  the cell is usually
much larger than the fluoride concentration observed after exposure to
fluoride pollutants, it is necessary to postulate that much of the calcium
is present as chelates or as insoluble complexes and that the actual free
ionic calcium content is quite small.  Thus buildup of fluoride could
precipitate the small concentration of ionic calcium required for normal
metabolism.

     Ramagopal, Welkie, and Miller  (1969) observed  that 5-min fluoride
treatments of wheat seedling roots  produced the same response as calcium
deficiency and that potassium oxalate, sodium ethylenediaminetetraacetate,
and sodium monofluoroacetate additions all elicited a similar response.
Garrec et al. (1974) found that both fluoride and calcium accumulated in
the injured tips of fir needles, presumably as calcium fluoride.  However,
although fluoride increased the total calcium level and the amount of cal-
cium oxalate in these needles, other insoluble calcium salts  (e.g., carbo-
nates and phosphates) were only slightly increased.  Brennan, Leone, and
Daines (1950) reported that increased calcium in nutrient solutions led
to increased fluoride content "in and about" tomato roots, apparently
due to calcium fluoride precipitation.

-------
                                  146


     In support of the idea that the mechanism of fluoride injury occurs
through interference with calcium metabolism, Pack (1966) observed that
injury to foliage from hydrogen fluoride fumigation was greatest when
tomatoes were grown at the lowest calcium level (40 ppm calcium).  At
calcium levels of 40, 80, 120, and 200 ppm, hydrogen fluoride treatment
caused significant decreases in total fruit weight per plant and in average
fruit weight.  A seedless condition of fruit was also more prevalent for
hydrogen fluoride treatments at the 40 ppm calcium level.  These effects
were observed at the "high" hydrogen fluoride level of fumigation (6 yg
of fluoride per cubic meter, 21 weeks), but not at the "low" level (2.9
yg of fluoride per cubic meter, 21 weeks); both levels are considerably
higher than expected for outdoor areas.  In other studies, the decreased
sensitivity of mandarin leaves to atmospheric fluoride compared with glad-
iolus leaves, was attributed to the increased calcium and decreased sili-
con contents of mandarin leaves (Suketa and Yamamoto, 1975).

4.3.1.6  Mechanisms of Enzyme Inhibition — Fluoride inhibition of most
enzymes probably occurs by complex formation with the polyvalent cations
(iron, calcium, and magnesium) of metalloenzymes, making the ions unavail-
able for their role as cofactors.  A discussion of the effects of fluoride
on enzyme activity is given by Hewitt and Nicholas (1963).  Enolase inhi-
bition by fluoride occurs by the formation of a magnesium fluorophosphate
complex that is inactive as a cofactor.  A complex of fluoride, magnesium,
and glucose-1-phosphate inhibits phosphoglucomutase activity.  Several
other enzymes requiring magnesium are also inhibited, to a varying extent,
by fluoride.  Similar examples exist for enzymes containing iron.  The
observed inhibition kinetics are often complex, and the extent of inhibi-
tion for different divalent metalloenzymes varies considerably.  Most of
these studies involve enzymes isolated from animal or microbial systems.

     A variety of enzymes are inhibited in vitro by fluorides, but the
relationship between the inhibition of specific enzymes and the physio-
logical disorders and symptoms that occur is poorly understood (Section
4.3.1.3).  For example, adenosine diphosphate sulfurylase, isolated from
yeast or spinach leaves, is inhibited by fluorides (Burnell and Anderson,
1973).  However, data are not available to determine if such inhibition
occurs in vivo, and no information on aberrant sulfur metabolism in
fluoride-treated plants was found.

4.3.2  Symptoms of Fluoride Accumulation

4.3.2.1  Foliar Symptoms — The best described symptoms of fluoride expo-
sure relate to foliage.  On monocotyledonous plants, marginal chlorosis
and subsequent marginal necrosis often occur (Weinstein and McCune, 1971).
On dicotyledonous plants, fluoride exposure results in leaf tip chlorosis,
which develops downward along the margins with subsequent necrosis.  In
both types of plants, necrosis usually occurs without prior chlorosis and
is prevalent in the tip and margin regions, areas where tissue fluoride
concentrations are the highest (Treshow and Pack, 1970).  Depending on
the species, the necrotic zone may become yellow, brown, violet, or red.
Interveinal chlorosis also occurs in some species, (maize, some citrus,
and rose) exposed to low fluoride concentrations for a short period of
time (Brewer, 1966).

-------
                                   147


     There is wide variation in the susceptibility of different plant
species (Table 4.13).  Some ornamental and forest conifers are highly
susceptible, while many broadleaf forest and ornamental deciduous plants
are intermediate to resistant.  Most important fruits and berries are at
least moderately susceptible, and some (e.g., peaches and blueberries)
are very susceptible to fluoride injury.  There is disagreement on the
degree of susceptibility of some species or varieties (National Academy
of Sciences, 1971).

     Common agricultural species used as indicators of fluoride pollution
include gladiolus, wine grapes, apricots, and ponderosa pines (Brewer,
1966).  Nettle-leaf goosefoot (Chenopodium murale), chickweed (Stellaria
media), pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus), and annual bluegrass (Poo. annua)
are weed species useful as indicators.

     The concentration of fluoride in tissues showing toxic symptoms
varies with species (Table 4.6) (Brewer, 1966).  With some exceptions,
little injury is expected in plants containing less than 20 ppm fluoride
or plants exposed to less than 0.2 ppb fluoride in air (Hill, 1969).  In-
jury is shown in many species containing tissue levels of 20 to 200 ppm
fluoride and in species exposed to fumigation concentrations of 0.2 to 4
ppb fluoride.  Some plants are not damaged at tissue fluoride concentra-
tions greater than 500 ppm (National Academy of Sciences, 1971).  Various
factors determine the exact response occurring under field conditions;
these include environmental factors (light, water, and temperature), pol-
lutant form, and biological factors (species, developmental stage, and
age).

     Severity of injury is not necessarily related to the fluoride content
of the tissue, although a certain minimum level of fluoride is required
before visible injury occurs.  Examination of many species shows that there
is no relationship between the number of stomata per leaf and the suscept-
ibility of the species to hydrogen fluoride (Zimmerman and Hitchcock, 1956).
The leaf-fluoride content of different rose varieties exposed to 1 to 3
ppb hydrogen fluoride is not related to the severity of chlorosis or necro-
sis that develops (Brewer, Sutherland, and Guillemet, 1967).  Extensive
work on the effects of fluorides on gladiolus showed that more resistant
varieties accumulate more fluoride in the leaves than susceptible varie-
ties (Hitchcock et al., 1971; Hitchcock, Zimmerman, and Coe, 1962).  For
a given variety, a significant linear relationship exists between the
extent of tip burn and the concentration of fluoride.  In mixed plantings
of the forage crops timothy (Phleum pratense L.) and red clover (TrifoHum
pvatense L.), high continuous hydrogen fluoride treatment produces severe
tip burn, marginal necrosis, chlorosis, and high tissue content of fluo-
ride.  Intermittent exposure to hydrogen fluoride results in high tissue
levels of fluoride; however, tissue damage is not as extensive as with
continuous exposure to the same concentration.  This suggests that detox-
ification might occur during the nonfumigation period.  Injury, therefore,
is related to the manner of exposure and the concentrations experienced
during the life cycle.

-------
                                                148
                      TABLE 4.13.  SENSITIVITY OF SELECTED PLANTS TO FLUORIDE
Apricot, Chinese and Royal
  Prunue armeniaca L.
Box elder
  Acer negundo L.
Blueberry
  Vaecinium sp.
Corn, sweet
  Zea may a L.
Fir, Douglas
  Paeudotauga taxi folia Brit.
Gladiolus
  Gladiolus sp.
Apple, Delicious
  Malue eylveetria Mill.
Apricot, Moorpark and Tilton
  Prunua armeniaca L.
Arborvitae
  Thuia sp.
Ash, green
  FraxinuB penneylvanica var.
  lanceolata Borkh.
Aspen, quaking
  Populus tremuloidee Michx.
Aster
  Aster sp.
Barley (young plants)
  Hordewn vulgare L.
Cherry, Bing, Royal Ann
  Prunua avium L.
Cherry, choke
  Prunua virginiana L.
Chickweed
  Ceraetium sp.
Clover, yellow
  Melilotiia oflieinalia Lam.
Citrus (lemon, tangerine)
  Citrus sp.
Geranium
  Geranium sp.
Goldenrod
  Solidago ap.
Ash, European mountain
  Sorbue causuparia L.
Ash, Modesto
  Fraxinue velutina Torr.
Asparagus
  Aeparague sp.
Birch,  cutleaf
  Betula pendula var.
  graoilie Roth.
Bridal  wreath
  Spiraea prunifolia Sieb.
  and Zucc.
Burdock
  Arctium sp.
Cherry, flowering
  Prunua aerrata L.
Cotton
  Goeaypium hirautum L.
           Sensitive

Grape, European
  Vitie vinifera L.
Grape, Oregon
  Mahonia repene Don.
Larch, western
  Larix occidantalie Nutt.
Peach (fruit)
  Prunue peraioa Sieb. and
  Zucc.
Pine, Eastern white, lodgepole.
  Scotch, Mugho
  Pinna atrobua L.,
  Pinua contorta Dougl.,

         Intermediate

Grape, Concord
  Vitie lobrueca L.
Grapefruit (fruit)
  Citrus paradiai Mact.
Grass, crab
  Digitoria eanguinalia L. Scop.
Lamb's-quarters
  Chenopodium album L.
Lilac
  Syringa vulgarie L.
Linden, European
  Filia cordata Mill.
Maple, hedge
  Acer oampeetre L.
Maple, silver
  Acer aaoaharinum L.
Mulberry, red
  Mofua mbra L.
Narcissus
  Narcioeue sp.
Nettle-leaf goosefoot
  Chenopodium sp.
Orange
  Citrus eineneia Oabeck
Peony
  Poeonia sp.
           Resistant

Current
  Ptibee sp.
Elderberry
  SambucuB sp.
Elm, American
  UlmuB ameriaana L.
Juniper, most species
  Juniperue sp.
Linden, American
  Tilia americana L.
Pear
  Pyrue aormunie L.
Pigweed
  Amaranthua retroflexua L.
Plane tree
  Platonua sp.
Plum, flowering
  Prunue oeroeifera Enrh.
  Pinua aylveatria L.,
  Pinue mugho Turra.
Pine, ponderosa
  Pinus ponderoaa Laws.
Plum, Bradshaw
  Prunua domeatioa L.
Prune, Italian
  Prunua domeatiea L.
Spruce, blue
  Picca pungene Englm.
Tulip
  Tulipa geeneriana L.
Poplar, Lombardy and Carolina
  Populua nigra L. and Populua
  eugenei Simon-Louis
Raspberry
  Rubua idaaue t.
Rhododendron
  Rhododendron sp.
Rose
  Rosa odorata Sweet
Serviceberry
  Amlanohier alnifolia Nutt
Sorghum
  Sorghum vulgare Pera.
Spruce, white (young needles)
  Picea glanca Moench, Voss.
Sumac, smooth
  Rhua glabra L.
Sunflower
  tielianthuB sp.
Violet
  Viola sp.
Walnut, black
  Juglans nigra L.
Walnut, English
  Juglane regia L.
Yew
  Taxue auepidata Sieb. and
  Zucc.
Pyracantha
  Pyraaantha sp.
Squash, summer
  Curourbita pepo L.
Strawberry
  Fragaria sp.
Tomato
  Lycopersiaon eseulentum Mill.
Tree of heaven
  Ailanthue altiseima L.
Virginia creeper
  Parthenooieeue quinquefolia
  Planch.
Willow, several species
  Salix sp.
Wheat
  Triticum sp.
      Source:   Adapted  from Treshow and  Pack,  1970,  Table  D-l,  p.
 the  publisher.
                               D-3.  Reprinted by permission of

-------
                                   149


     Atmospheric fluorides and root-absorbed fluorides can produce the
same symptoms (Brennan, Leone, and Daines, 1950).  Brewer, Sutherland,
and Guillemet (1969) reported that sprays of sodium fluoride and hydrogen
fluoride produced toxic symptoms in citrus trees indistinguishable from
those produced by fumigations with hydrogen fluoride gas.  Detached leaves
placed in fluoride solutions developed symptoms similar to those developed
through exposure to gaseous fluorides (Davison, Marsland, and Betts, 1974).
The percent of the leaf area injured was proportional to the fluoride con-
centration in the aqueous solution.  The authors are currently evaluating
this method at the University of Newcastle (England) as a technique to
determine relative susceptibility among various species.

     While specific symptoms produced by excessive fluoride exposure are
quite similar in many species, they are not unique and can be induced in
some species by disease or environmental stress (National Academy of Sci-
ences, 1971).  For example, moisture stress can cause necrosis in leaf
margins, and manganese deficiency in peach, cherry, and citrus can cause
marginal chlorosis and necrosis.  Treshow and Pack (1970) listed other
examples that mimic fluoride injury.  It is difficult to prove that a
particular injury is due to fluoride exposure, especially in the field.
Adams (1963) discussed the problem of relating injury symptoms to causal
agents and presented modifications of Koch's postulates (originally used
to relate disease to a causal agent) as a guide for experiments designed
to determine causes of injuries.

     Fluorides affect the water balance of plants.  Tomato, buckwheat,
and peach wilt when treated with high concentrations of fluoride (50 to
400 ppm) in nutrient solutions (Leone et al., 1948; Prince et al., 1949).
At moderate fluoride levels (10 to 50 ppm), tip and marginal scorching
(necrosis) occurs.  Citrus trees wilt when exposed to 100 ppm fluoride
in nutrient solution (Brewer et al., 1959).  High fumigation concentra-
tions produce extensive abscission of leaves and young fruits of citrus
plants (MacLean et al., 1968).  Wilting of the succulent portions of new
growth also occurs.

     Poovaiah and Wiebe (1973) found that hydrogen fluoride fumigation
greatly reduces transpiration in soybean, producing partial stomatal
closure in 1 hr and complete closure within 4 hr.  The transpiration rate
was greatly reduced by fumigation, whereas leaf temperature increased.
Halbwachs (1970) found that trees  injured by fluoride exhibit a decrease
in suction tension with increasing leaf or needle injury.  The suction
tension in trees with an uneven water balance declines abruptly in the
upper regions of the crown.  Garrec, Plebin, and Lhoste (1975) demon-
strated that increased transpiration occurs in the region of corn leaves
undergoing necrosis.  This effect is not unexpected, however, since
necrosis results in tissue disruption, including plasmolysis, leading to
decreased ability of tissues to regulate water loss.

     Water status can affect the response of the plant to hydrogen fluo-
ride (Zimmerman and Hitchcock, 1956).  Exposure to periodic wilting con-
ditions allowed tomato and sweet potato plants to be more resistant to
fluoride injury even though there was an ample water supply during the

-------
                                   150


fumigation period.  This result was not due to the amount of fluoride
absorbed, since tomato and corn plants exposed to periodic wilting con-
tained higher fluoride concentrations than the watered controls.

     Fluoride-induced injury symptoms in plants are discussed further in
a report on injury symptoms observed in ten common crop species (Pack and
Sulzbach, 1976).  Injury symptoms caused by other agents resembling fluo-
ride injury are discussed in Treshow and Pack (1970).

4.3.2.2  Histological Observations — Microscopic observations of fluoride
injury are rare, and of the few observations made, most are of tissue
with extreme damage rather than tissue just beginning to show toxicity
symptoms.  Treshow, Anderson, and Harner (1967) summarized Solberg's data
on the histological changes that occur in pine needles showing fluoride
injury.  Phloem and xylem parenchyma become enlarged and distorted, fol-
lowed by granulation, vacuolation, and eventual collapse of the protoplasm.
The advancing region of collapsing mesophyll next to the necrotic zone is
only a few cells in thickness.  Carlson (1973) observed that fluoride in-
jury in pine needles caused hypertrophy in phloem and transfusion paren-
chyma which led to collapse of xylem and phloem.  Nuclear enlargement and
chlorophyll destruction also occurred.  Pine needles from trees growing
near fluoride pollution sources or from low-dose fumigation experiments
showed hyperplasia and hypertrophy of phloem cells and resin duct occlu-
sion (Stewart, Treshow, and Harner, 1973).  However, several other envi-
ronmental stresses can also produce similar histological responses.

     In cotton (Gossypium hirsutum), fewer chloroplasts occur in mesophyll
cells of fluoride-treated leaves; the effect is more pronounced in spongy
than in palisade mesophyll cells  (Timmermann, Applegate, and Engleman,
1970).  Electron microscopy of Rubus hispidus explants cultured in the
presence of fluoride showed elongation of mitochondrial cristae and in-
creased density of the stroma  (Pilet and Roland, 1972).  The number of
free ribosomes diminished, and the endoplasmic reticulum dilated causing
formation of vesicles.

4.3.2.3  Fruit Disorders — Fluoride exposure affects fruit production in
a number of species.  Peaches exposed to atmospheric fluoride concentra-
tions too low to produce foliar symptoms developed a soft "suture red spot"
syndrome (Facteau and Wang, 1972; Treshow and Pack, 1970).  The extent of
fruit injury is influenced by calcium and boron nutrition.  Lime sprays
are effective in reducing the occurrence of soft suture (Thomas and Alther,
1966).

     Exposure of strawberry plants to 0.55 to 10.4 yg of fluoride per
cubic meter produced deformed fruit, decreased the average fruit weight,
and reduced the proportion of flowers that set fruit (Pack, 1972).  No
effect was found on the number of flowers formed.  The data support the
author's contention that hydrogen fluoride affects fruiting in plants by
interfering with fertilization or seed development.

     Tendergreen beans showed no foliar injury or consistent effects on
fruiting with continuous exposures (60 to 92 days) of 2.2 yg of hydrogen

-------
                                   151


fluoride per cubic meter  (Pack, 197l£>) .  Chlorosis was observed with con-
tinuous exposures of 6.6 and 13.9 yg of fluoride per cubic meter.  At 13.9
pg of fluoride per cubic meter, dry and wet weights of bean tops were not
affected; however, the number of fruits per plant, number of seeds per
fruit, and dry weight of fruit were all significantly decreased.  Contin-
uous exposure to 2.1 yg of fluoride per cubic meter did not produce foli-
age symptoms but did increase the amount of starch found in a seed.  Beans
grown in an atmosphere containing 2.1, 9.1, and 10.5 yg of fluoride per
cubic meter produced Fj. progeny that were less vigorous than controls
and had increased abnormalities of early trifoliate leaves (Pack, 1971a).
These effects appear related to the decreased starch content per seed or
decreased seed size.  Fewer F3 generation plants had abnormalities; con-
sequently, the inheritability of such  characteristics is in doubt.

     Tomato plants exposed to high concentrations of hydrogen fluoride
produce small partially or completely  seedless fruit.  Plants on low cal-
cium budgets respond similarly.  The combined effects of hydrogen fluoride
and low calcium appear additive; thus, fluoride apparently functions by
interfering with calcium metabolism.   Supporting evidence is found in
experiments concerning the effects of  hydrogen fluoride and low calcium
on germination of tomato and cucumber  pollen (Sulzbach and Pack, 1972).
With low calcium (.15 mA/), 2.6 and 10.5 raM sodium fluoride inhibits tomato
pollen germination, but no fluoride inhibition is observed with higher
calcium concentrations.  Similar observations occur with pollen from fumi-
gated plants.  However, cucumber pollen germination is not inhibited at
concentrations of fluoride lower than  10.2 yg/m3, regardless of calcium
nutrition.

     Fruit production decreased in citrus trees sprayed with aqueous
sodium fluoride, but no significant effects on fruit quality occurred
at doses designed to yield foliar fluoride concentrations of 75 and 150
ppm (Brewer, Sutherland, and Guillemet, 1969).  Fluoride exposure also
caused necrosis, decreased tree growth, and smaller fruit yield.  Most
reduction in yield probably resulted from fluoride exposure during spring
bloom and growth flush (Leonard and Graves, 1970, 1972).  Extensive injury
decreased the fruit yield the next year even though the tree was not
exposed to additional atmospheric fluorides.

     Examination of the fruiting response of ten important crop species
exposed to hydrogen fluoride in growth chambers showed that soybean was
the most sensitive (no seeds produced  with continuous exposure of 0.64 yg
of fluoride per cubic meter) and cotton the least sensitive (no effects
at 8.0 yg of fluoride per cubic meter) (Pack and Sulzbach, 1976).  The
order of decreasing sensitivity was soybean, bell pepper, sweet corn,
cucumber, pea, grain, sorghum, oat, wheat, barley, and cotton.  Common
responses included fewer seeds per plant and smaller seed size.  The
authors suggested that reduced seed production was due to the inhibition
of pollen germination or pollen tube growth.

     Fewer data are available on fluoride injury to flowers (National
Academy of Sciences, 1971).  Fluoride  may reduce the number of flower buds
and size of the flower, change the flower color, and produce necrotic zones

-------
                                    152
(lonescu,  Serbanescu, and Pal, 1972).   Treshow and Pack (1970) stated  that
"flower  petals are rarely injured  in  the field."  However, petunia and
cyclamen flowers were cited as exceptions.   Gladiolus flowers are resist-
ant  to fluoride, even though their leaves are extremely sensitive.   Cut
gladiolus flowers developed injury symptoms when exposed to about 1  ppm
fluoride in reservoir water (Marousky and Woltz, 1971).  Flower develop-
ment was inhibited by hydrogen fluoride in pepper (4.5 yg/m3) and corn
(8.7 yg/m3) (Pack and Sulzbach, 1976).

4.3.2.4   Germination — The effects of fluoride on seed germination are
reviewed by Thomas and Alther (1966).   Germination is inhibited at higher
fluoride concentrations, although  the extent of inhibition depends on
species  and exposure time.  For example, a 72-hr exposure of lentil  seeds
to 1 mW  and 10 wM sodium fluoride  reduced germination to 75% and 5%  of
control  respectively.  In some field  experiments, increased germination
was  observed after application of  fluorides to the soil.

4.3.3  Effects of Fluoride on Growth  and Productivity

4.3.3.1   Implications of Agriculture  — Weinstein and McCune (1971) dis-
cussed the effects of fluoride on  agriculture (Figure 4.7).  They noted
that effects on the quality of agricultural produce are easier to establish
than effects on quantity and that  fluoride damage not only affects the
product  directly but affects production costs as well.  Even if product
quality  or quantity is not affected,  increased fluoride content in plants
                                                      ORNL-DWG 79-20900
                  EFFECT ON AGRICULTURE
                                 I
                                DECREASED VALUE
                                  OF PRODUCT
                      INCREASED COST ,
                      OF PRODUCTION
                          I
                          I
                          t
                                           I
                                          JL
             EFFECTS ON QUANTITY
                OF PRODUCT
             EFFECTS ON QUALITY
                OF PRODUCT
                                                EFFECTS ON MARKETING
                                                    OF PRODUCT
                                     INCREASED UNIT COST
 INDIRECT EFFECTS OF
    POLLUTANT
COST OF AMELIORATION
  OR PREVENTION
           DECREASED VALUE OF FACILITIES
                 AND EQUIPMENT
     Figure  4.7.   Possible effects of fluoride on agriculture.  Source:
Adapted from Weinstein and McCune, 1971, Figure 1,  p.  412.  Reprinted by
permission of the publisher.

-------
                                   153


may lead to fluorosis in animals  consuming  these plants.  These concerns
are the impetus for studies relating  atmospheric fluoride concentrations
to tissue fluoride concentrations, growth inhibition, and visible damage
symptoms — symptoms that might decrease  the quality of  the plant product
or decrease plant productivity.   Ultimately,  such  data  could be used to
recommend air quality criteria.

     In establishing air quality  standards  for  fluoride, three different
criteria can be used:   (1) the fluoride  content of vegetation, (2) the
fluoride content of the atmosphere, and  (3) vegetation  markings (necrosis,
chlorosis, and other symptoms)  (Hill,  1969).  One  should also consider that
(1) fluoride is an accumulative toxicant, and injury  is usually associated
with long-term exposure; (2)  gaseous  and particulate  fluorides differ in
their phytotoxicity; (3) plant species and  varieties  differ greatly in
susceptibility to fluoride; and (4) extremely low  concentrations can cause
damage to sensitive species (Hill, 1969).   Hill discussed the advantages
and problems of each approach and concluded that analysis for necrosis or
chlorosis (damage assessment) is  the  best approach because this reflects
the fluoride content in air.  For a given area, species diversity, sensi-
tivity, and air-concentration-time relationships are  all manifest in such
an assessment.  However, Weinstein (1969) pointed  out that examining the
extent of fluoride damage is  a useful  procedure for evaluating and recti-
fying the proposed standard,  not  implementing it.  He believes that more
constant vigilance is necessary and that this could best be accomplished
through "use of a series of provisional  time  concentration values for
atmospheric fluorides which reasonably reflect  the state of our present
knowledge, in conjunction with appropriate  atmospheric  sampling stations,
vegetation analysis, and periodic vegetation  surveys."  Obviously, air
standards cannot be determined without adequate information relating air
concentrations of fluoride to markings and  fluoride accumulation in plants.
By considering the factors listed by  Hill (1969) and  accumulating data
concerning the relation of fluoride time-concentration  exposure to injury
(growth reduction and visible symptoms), a  set  of  air quality criteria
could be established for a given  area with  known species diversity.  There
is consensus that such data are lacking  at  the  present  time.  Treshow and
Pack (1970) noted the inability of investigators quantitatively to relate
the degree of injury in plants to fluoride  concentrations in plant tissue
or in the air.  Thus crop loss and injury can only be observed in the field
(i.e., after the fact).  They concluded  that  knowledge  of vegetation fluo-
ride levels is only useful to determine  the effectiveness of air pollution
control programs.  Considerable disagreement  thus  exists concerning what
criteria should be used to establish  air quality standards.  Furthermore,
the adopted concepts should not be restricted to agricultural systems but
should be extended to natural ecosystems as well.

     Fluoride is an accumulative  toxicant and injury  in the field is
usually caused by the accumulation of fluoride  over a period of several
weeks to several months.  Unfortunately  few long-term fumigation studies
have been conducted to determine  the  relationship  between long-term expo-
sure and injury.  Hill  (1969) summarized his  long-term  exposure studies
as follows:  "In the greenhouse,  continuous exposure  to hydrogen fluoride

-------
                                   154
in the concentration range 0.4 to 0.6 ppb for several months will cause
severe injury to sensitive varieties of gladiolus, apricots, peaches,
and corn."

     To summarize relationships between atmospheric fluoride concentrations
and injury, McCune (1969) presented log-log plots of the data from many
literature reports.  For each species, mean concentrations of fluoride in
air are plotted on the ordinate and the duration of exposure is plotted on
the abscissa; in addition, an indication is made at each point whether
visible injury occurred, whether growth or yield was affected, and what
tissue fluoride concentrations were found.  Figures 4.8-4.11 give results
for tomato, alfalfa, gladiolus, and sorghum respectively.  Since the data
were gathered from diverse literature sources, a number of factors contrib-
ute to the uncertainty of establishing permissible air concentrations of
                                                       ORNL-DWG 79-20882
l\J
lO
o^
3"
uj 103
Q
DC
O

U.
u
01 402
I
Q.

0
5

. .
O ^0
z
o
2j
tr
i—
§ 10°
z
o
u
z
UJ


5!
—
•^~

	 •
HI
w«
~
mmmlf

^__
=



—


—
—
	
—
^3-
^~
^^
—
— —
^~
1

1 1 1 1 III 1 1 1 1 1 1 III) 1 1 1 1 1 III l-=
0 NO FOLIAR MARKINGS OBSERVED =
• MARKINGS PRESENT -
D THRESHOLD OR POINT AT WHICH MARKINGS
* FIRST APPEAR _
^L^ A NO EFFECT ON YIELD =

••• "^^.^ A SIGNIFICANT REDUCTION IN Z
(°)\± r**^^^ YIELD
\^ *^»». ~~
O Nl "^"^
o x\ • ^*^a 1
\ >» o —
. ^^. ^™
^^ ^s
x^ x\ -
D O^ 1 \
O^* •l*Q^i>O o ^v 	
D CD 3 """"^"•QO N^ —
• U "^^-^-. ^ =
O ^ D """""Ci^ ~
00 ~
A° _
«
•••
—
_
II ^^
I 1 1 1 Mill 1
10*



103


~
^
^
ex
z
o
t-
<
tr
z
1O^ o
z
o
0
u.
I
«p





,
10 10 100
                           DURATION OF EXPOSURE

     Figure 4.8.  Relation of concentration and duration of exposure to
effects of atmospheric  fluoride on tomato.  Adapted from McCune, 1969,
Figure 2, p.  15.  Reprinted by permission of the publisher.

-------
                                   155
*i
6 .~«« URNL-DWG 79-2088C
O>
Ul
O
CC
O
3 100
u.
o
(T
Ul
0.
i 10

u.
o
z
o
K 1.0
H
Ul
o
o
u
< 0.1
5
~ 1 1 1 1 1 Ml| 1 1 1111111) I 1 1 1 1 1 ll|


„

_
—
— (/>)^.
^*--*.^
•»•
*^^
""""•^^.^ 1943
•*^l
*~

I —
—


—

-=
—
— b-*^ —
__

—
~

"™
^
^
N^x
^Q "^Q— 7Q X—*
j^ oo 
-------
                                    156
                                                           ORNL-DWG 79-20901

20
10
E
Ll_ ^^
o 51
z 3 5
Q uj
b °
2 *
z§ 2
8 ^
is i
UJ
Z I
< Q-
uj to 0.5
si
^

0.2

0 1
J ' " I I
" °\
	 50>
—
^—

__
—


—
	
—



- * NO EFFECT
III]
26
V
\
x
X
N

3
*
2
0.7
*



1 "
35 47
45
* 22


^° f=<5
S*3 *2
*T^W
7^V
6 *
• ?:
2 3



MINI; | i
53 52

38 44


22
3 V 44
3. • 33
E 26 *
si**31 4S.72«
v ?5~* !• * «52
V^ 46 *,e 2.°
"^Vv ^ «6 3.°
a" 28f >• 4
M- ~^A^fc^25
• 42* 9 ^"^
6 a A ^X^
1 | 1 1 1 1
—


-
—
—
___


— _
45
• —
46 ^^
—
* 	
ON FLOWERING — I
OR CORM PRODUCTION




6
0.2
~ - SIGNIFICANT REDUCTION OBSERVED J _
I I I I I
0.1 0.2 0.5
Mil
1
| |
2
I I I Mil I I
5 10 20
1 1 1 III

20

mf\ -^
\

A
r>
5 3^

?
3 I
^
UJ
1 z
o
o
0.5 £



0.2
r\ i
\^« 1
50 100
                          DURATION OF EXPOSURE (days)

     Figure  4.10.   Relation of concentration and  duration  of  exposure  to
effects of atmospheric  fluoride on gladiolus.   The numbers at indicated
points represent percent  of leaf area necrosis  induced by  atmospheric
fluoride.  Source:  Adapted from McCune,  1969,  Figure 6, p. 19.   Reprinted
by permission of the publisher.

-------
                                   157
                                                         ORNL-DWG 79-20881
1UW
^
p
v 50
o>

3*
UJ
a
0 20
3
u
E 10
UJ
Q.
(/>
o 5
^
U.
O
2
O 9
i
4
ce
H-
UJ 1
O
o
2 0.5
UJ

I I I I ' I ' I
— 0 NO FOLIAR MARKINGS OBSERVED -
— • FOLIAR MARKINGS PRESENT Z
D THRESHOLD -
^ __
A NO EFFECT ON GROWTH OR YIELD _
~ ft A SIGNIFICANT REDUCTION IN GROWTH
_ • OR YIELD
A 	
... ^
— """"^-^
— """"^-.^ f _
~~ f/*l "^""^ ~"
- (A)X\ A A ^\ I
— x\ ^x _
>^ | Xxs -
r^ ><-*^ X. 	
	 n V ^^-^S A 4 XNA
A A Q fc ^?^^ — 	 	 ^ ^ ^l
v "^"~*^ — «^^E ^^ —
^. — ^fc
(^ ) •*» ^ * A

~ ^-^^ §. A
— A "^ * V. *
1— A """-s. ^^. • —
	 ^^ ^»,^ - —
— ^"*--*.^_ ^*sA^ —
_ A * 	 A 	 -
II 1 1 1 1 1 1
iuw



50



20 ^
V-
f\
10 3

o
K
(E
5 B
o
o
o
2 u.
I


1


0.5

                         345       8   10
                        DURATION OF EXPOSURE (doys)
20
30
     Figure 4.11.  Relation of concentration and duration of  exposure to
effects of atmospheric fluoride on sorghum  (Milo maize). Source:   Adapted
from McCune, 1969, Figure 4, p. 17.  Reprinted by permission  of  the
publisher.

-------
                                   158


 fluoride below which no effects are observed  (McCune, 1969; National Acad-
 emy of Sciences, 1971).  In Figures 4.8-4.11, the dashed lines represent
 maximum air concentrations of fluoride that cannot be exceeded during spe-
 cified time intervals without causing plant injury.  For tomato  (Figure
 4.8), line a represents limits above which foliar markings occur, whereas
 line b represents limits above which reduction in quality or quantity of
 tomato fruits occurs.  For alfalfa (Figure 4.9), line a represents fluo-
 ride concentrations in air above which leaf markings occur; line b repre-
 sents concentrations which, if exceeded, would lead to the accumulation
 of tissue fluoride greater than 35 ppm.  (At the time of publication, 35
 ppm was used as an air quality standard in Montana and New York.)  For
 gladiolus (Figure 4.10), a plant very susceptible to fluoride injury, the
 line represents concentrations in air which, if exceeded, damage more than
 5% of the leaf area.  If damage greater than 10% occurs, there is a sig-
 nificant reduction in flower and corn yields.  The data plotted for sorghum
 (Figure 4.11) illustrate the difficulty in establishing criteria.  Lines
 a and c represent levels in air that define vegetative markings and reduc-
 tions in yield, respectively, in a fluoride-susceptible variety.  Lines
 b and d are similarly defined for a resistant variety.
     *                                > '•
     One problem with the graphs presented by McCune is that the duration
 of the exposure periods used for intermittent exposures is the sum of the
 periods in which treatment took place, not the length of the entire expo-
 sure period.  It is difficult to use these curves for establishing stand-
 dards or determining the relationship between ambient concentrations and
 injury because the relationship in the field has to be based on average
 concentrations (not just when the pollutant is blowing from the source)
 over the total duration of the exposure period.

     Modern studies of the effects of fluoride on growth and productivity
 of agricultural plants are usually extrapolations of the results of exper-
 imental fumigations to field situations.   Large-scale field studies are
 seldom made because of the difficulties of controlling variables, the un-
 certainties of applying the results to other sites and crops, and the exces-
 sive cost (Weinstein and McCune, 1971).  However, field studies are still
 occasionally performed to evaluate special environmental circumstances,
 such as the presence of a fluoride-emitting factory.  In one such study
 made near Dresden, DMssler (1971) measured the yield of winter wheat as a
 function of distance from a hydrofluoric acid factory.  He observed reduc-
 tions in yield of 12.5%, 21.6%, and 25.5% at distances of 2000 m, 1700 m,
 and 1100 m, respectively, from the factory, compared with the yield at
 2700 m.   Emissions from the factory varied during the test but frequently
 exceeded 10 ug of fluoride per cubic meter and occasionally exceeded 50 yg
 of fluoride per cubic meter.   Decreased yields or damaged fruit were also
 observed at distances up to 6 km for fruit trees (particularly pear, sweet
 cherry,  apple,  and plum) and tomatoes.

 4.3.3.2   Fluorides and Pollution — Fluoride content is increased in plants
 growing in the vicinity of fluoride pollution sources, and as a result,
 growth and productivity of these plants are inhibited.  Because of the
extensive mining of large phosphate deposits in Florida (over 30 years)
and the  subsequent release of fluoride to the atmosphere, vast citrus and

-------
                                   159


gladiolus crops, as well as the truck crops in the area, have been damaged
(Thomas and Alther, 1966).  The expansion of the aluminum industry in the
western United States and Canada has, likewise, produced significant fluo-
ride pollution in the surrounding area.  Thomas and Alther (1966) cited
cases in California of industrial fluoride pollution damage to citrus
fruits and wine grapes.  Pines and gladiolus in the northwestern United
States also have been damaged by fluorides produced from aluminum factor-
ies.  Fluoride pollution from a phosphate reduction plant in Georgetown
Canyon, Idaho, killed about 200 acres of Douglas fir trees (Treshow,
Anderson, and Haraer, 1967).  Needles from trees that eventually died
contained an average of 274 ppm fluoride, while needles from trees with
no visible symptoms of injury contained 150 ppm fluoride.  Needles from
control area trees contained only 24 ppm fluoride.

     Fluoride injury can occur over an extensive area.  Conifers in an
area of about 69,000 acres in northwestern Montana showed fluoride damage
and contained greater than control levels of fluoride (Carlson, 1973).
Emissions from the Anaconda Aluminum Company smelter were determined to
be the source of the fluoride.
                                                                 -
     Gilbert (1973) reviewed the sensitivity of lichens to fluoride pol-
lution and documented several instances where industrial point squrces of
fluoride pollution resulted in the loss of lichen flora.  Fluoride contents
of lichens may vary considerably, and the content can be decreased by wash-
ing or by rains.  Toxicity symptoms include chlorosis and necrosis.

     Only a few literature comments are available concerning the recovery
of woody plants after field exposure to high fluoride concentrations.
After a spill-related release of fluoride in New Jersey in May, peach trees
(completely defoliated) and Douglas firs recovered and appeared near normal
by August.  Norway and blue spruce showed necrosis and abscission and did
not show regrowth; the buds did not emerge from their already dormant con-
dition.  Needles of Austrian and Scotch pine did not abscise, but new
growth did not appear (Rhoads and Brennan, 1975) .

4.3.3.3  Growth Effects — Concentrations of fluoride producing high tissue
fluoride concentrations and extensive leaf damage will also reduce the
growth of the plant (Thomas and Alther, 1966; Treshow, 1971).  Numerous
examples of this behavior are reported.  Linear growth enhancement occurs
in some plants at low fluoride concentrations.  Fumigation of Koethen sweet
orange trees increased linear growth with no increase in leaf number, in-
dicating spindly growth (Matsushima and Brewer, 1972).  Stimulation of
shoot growth with hydrogen fluoride fumigation (2 ppb) occurs in some rose
varieties; however, the stems were weak and therefore the plants were more
fragile (Brewer, Sutherland, and Guillemet, 1967).  Hitchcock et al. (1971)
found that both the wet and dry weight of alfalfa and orchard grass in-
creased with fluoride exposure (six to eight days at the relatively high
levels of 16 to 17 yg of fluoride per cubic meter).  Benedict, Ross, and
Wade (1964), however, found that alfalfa, orchard grass, chard, and romaine
lettuce showed no injury symptoms, no significant growth reduction, and no
enhancement when continuously fumigated at <1 yg/m3 for 80 to 120 days.
Treshow and Harner (1968) found significant increases in bean weight with

-------
                                   160


 fumigations of 2.3 yg of fluoride per cubic meter for 21 days.  The prob-
 lems of intermittent versus continuous exposure, exposure duration, and
 species variability are discussed in Sections 4.2.4.1 and 4.3.3.1.

     Another somewhat controversial type of injury discussed in the lit-
 erature is hidden injury.  Hidden or invisible injury to a plant caused
 by  a pollutant is defined as interference with growth and normal function-
 ing without the appearance of visible lesions or symptoms (Thomas, 1958,
 1961).  This concept is of direct concern to agriculturalists interested
 in  optimizing plant yield because data must be obtained to determine if
 such injury occurs with the levels of fluoride found in the environment.
 Data supporting the hidden injury concept for fluorides are rare, however.

     Hill (1969) summarized long-term studies as follows:  in a ten-year-
 greenhouse study, orchard grass, brome grass, alta fescue, alfalfa, red
 clover, barley, onions, gladioli, celery, and other species were grown to
 the normal harvest stage in filtered air, the ambient air near an indus-
 trial plant, and hydrogen fluoride at concentrations well above those of
 the ambient air.  No growth reductions were measured except for gladiolus
 where leaf destruction was severe.  In similar studies with raspberries,
 strawberries, corn, tomatoes, prunes, apricots, and peaches, insufficient
 fruit was produced for reliable yield measurements, but determinations
 were made of the overall plant growth, dry weight, terminal growth, girth,
 number of runners, and other growth indices.  The ambient atmosphere had
 no  effect on growth of these crops and hydrogen fluoride caused an effect
 only when visible injury was produced.

     Exposure of gladiolus, a sensitive plant, to low levels of fluoride
 caused visible injury at the same rate as photosynthesis decreased (Table
 4.14) (Thomas, 1958).  Fumigation with higher concentrations of fluoride
 produced a larger decrease in photosynthesis, but recovery occurred after
 exposure, and the final decrease in photosynthesis was proportional to the
 damaged leaf area.  Fluorides that accumulated in the uninjured portions
 of  the leaf during exposure were translocated to the margins of the leaf
 during the recovery period.  Estimates of the extent of decrease in photo-
 synthesis during high-exposure periods, not accountable by leaf area dam-
 age, were only a few percent of the total photosynthesis of the crop.
 Thus it appears that hidden injury does not occur in gladiolus.  Hill
 (1969)  presented similar data for gladioli, strawberries, tomatoes, apri-
 cots, and corn.  He concluded that the treatment either did not have any
 significant effect on apparent photosynthesis or the effect could be
 accounted for by an equal amount of leaf necrosis.  With corn, chlorotic
mottling developed rather than necrosis, and the measured reduction in
 photosynthesis was attributed to reduced photosynthesis in the chlorotic
 tissue.   Hill et al. (1958) exposed tomatoes, a crop relatively resistant
 to fluoride, to rather high airborne fluoride concentrations (1.8 to 6.5
yg/m9 for the Moscow variety and 3.4 to 73 yg/m9 for the Loran Blood vari-
 ety) .  This exposure caused high tissue levels of fluoride.   No leaf symp-
 toms were observed in Moscow tomatoes and only a trace to 2% leaf area
 damage in the Loran Blood variety.  No difference in respiration or in
 average carbon dioxide assimilated per hour per plot was detected between
 treatment and control plots.  Consequently, the authors concluded that no
hidden injury occurred even with the high fluoride concentrations used.

-------
                                    161
              TABLE 4.14.  EFFECT OF FUMIGATION WITH RELATIVELY LOW CONCENTRATIONS
                    OF HYDROGEN FLUORIDE ON THE PHOTOSYNTHESIS OF PLANTS
HF fumigation
Plane

Fruit trees


Gladiolus
Surfside



Alladin
Algonquin
Commander Koehl
Mixed grain
Cotton

Duration0