United States Region 5 Illinois, Indiana
Environmental Protection 77 W. Jackson Blvd. Michigan, Ohio
Agency Chicago, II 60604-3507 Mmesate, Wisconsin
Environmental Sciences 7 November 1992 905-R-92-002
AEPA Project LEAP— Phase 1
Spatial And Numerical
Dimensions of Young
Minority Children Exposed
to Low-Level Environmental
Sources of Lead
Geographic Information
Systems Appendix
-------
SPATIAL AND NUMERICAL DIMENSIONS OF
YOUNG MINORITY CHILDREN EXPOSED TO LOW-LEVEL
ENVIRONMENTAL SOURCES OF LEAD
Geographic Information System
Appendix
BY
Lawrence Lehnnan
Geographic Information Systems Management Office
Environmental Sciences Division
U.S. EPA Region 5
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Region 5, Chicago
Environmental Sciences Division
Project LEAP (Lead Education and Abatement Program)
77 West Jackson Blvd, Chicago, Illinois 60604-3507
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
CHAPTER PAGE
1. INTRODUCTION
2. INDUSTRIAL SOURCE LONG TERM MODEL SUPPORT 2
2.1 OBTAINING METEROLOGICAL DATA 2
22 PROCESSING METEROLOGICAL DATA 3
2.3 CREATING CIS COVERAGES FROM ISCLT MODEL 3
2.4 USING CIS TO COMPARE MODELLED AND MONITORED DATA
3. DEMOGRAPHIC DATA SUPPORT 4
3.1 CHOICES OF DEMOGRAPHIC DATA J6
32 CHOOSING DONNELLEY DATA J6
3.3 CREATING GIS POLYGON COVERAGES FROM POINT DATA .7
3.4 DEFINING LEAP CPMMUNniES ; .7
4. UPTAKE BIOKINETIC MODEL RESULTS 9
4.1 SUMMARIZING THE DEMOGRAPHIC DATA FOR UBK ANALYSIS J9
42 GENERATING GIS COVERAGES FROM FROM THE UBK MODEL RESULTS —.9
5. PRODUCING MAPS OF THE UBK MODEL RESULTS ' 3
5.1 CHOOSING MAP FEATURES 10
52 CHOOSING THE UBK CATEGORIES 10
5.3 DESIGNING THE COLOR SHADES FOR THE COMMUNITIES 10
6. MAPS OF LEAP COMMUNITIES 10
Project LEAP GIS Appendix \ .
-------
LIST OF TABLES
TABLE
I
n
m
rv
V
VI
vn
vm
IX
x
XI
xn
xm
xrv
xv
XVI
xvn
xvra
XIX
xx
XXI
xxn
xxm
xxrv
xxv
XXVI
xxvn
xxvm
XXIX
xxx
XXXI
xxxn
xxxm
xxxrv
xxxv
xxxvi
xxxvn
xxxvrn
XXXIX
1980 CENSUS TRACTS COMPRISING LEAP COMMUNITIES PAGE
CITY, STATE
ROCK ISLAND, ILLINOIS
MOLINE, ILLINOIS
CHICAGO, ILLINIOS
KANKAKEE, ILLINOIS
PEORIA, ILLINOIS
BLOOMINGTON, ILLINOIS
NORMAL, ILLINOIS _
CHAMPAIGN, ILLINOIS —
URBANA, ILLINOIS
SPRINGFIELD, ILLINOIS ~
E. ST. LOUIS, ILLINOIS .-.
GRANITE CITY, ILLINOIS _
ROCKFORD, ILLINOIS
GARY, INDIANA _
HAMMOND, INDIANA ~
E. CHICAGO, INDIANA ~
SOUTH BEND, INDIANA —
MISHAWAKA, INDIANA _
ELKHART, INDIANA
FT. WAYNE, INDIANA
LaFAYETTE, INDIANA _
KOKOMO, INDIANA
ANDERSON, INDIANA ~
MUNCIE, INDIANA _
INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA _
TERRE HAUTE, INDIANA _
BLOOMINGTON, INDIANA
EVANSVILLE, INDIANA _
NEW ALBANY, INDIANA -_
SAGINAW, MICHIGAN
BAY CITY, MICHIGAN ~
MIDLAND, MICHIGAN
MUSKEGON, MICHIGAN
GRAND RAPIDS, MICHIGAN
LANSING, MICHIGAN
EAST LANSING, MICHIGAN
FLINT, MICHIGAN
DETROIT, MICHIGAN
ANN ARBOR, MICHIGAN .
29
.31
.31
—32
—32
—32
32
33
—33
—33
—33
34
34
34
35
35
35
36
36
36
36
37
37
38
.38
39
39
39
39
.40
.40
-40
.41
_42
.43
Project LEAP CIS Appendix
ii .
-------
LIST OF TABLES
TABLE 1980 CENSUS TRACTS COMPRISING LEAP COMMUNITIES PAGE
CITY, STATE
XL BATTLE CREEK, MICHIGAN
XLI JACKSON, MICHIGAN
XLH KALAMAZOO, MICHIGAN
XLHI BENTON HARBOR, MICHIGAN
XLIV MOORHEAD, MINNESOTA
XLV DULUTH, MINNESOTA
XLVI St CLOUD, MINNESOTA
XLVn MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA
XLVm St PAUL, MINNESOTA
XLIX ROCHESTER, MINNESOTA
L TOLEDO, OHIO
LI CLEVELAND, OHIO
LH AKRON, OHIO
Lm LORAIN, OHIO
LIV CANTON, OHIO
LV STEUBENVTLLE, OHIO
LVI YOUNGSTOWN, OHIO
LVn WARREN, OHIO
LVm MANSFIELD, OHIO
LIX LIMA, OHIO
LX DAYTON, OHIO
LXI SPRINGFIELD, OHIO
LXH COLUMBUS, OHIO
LXHI HAMILTON, OHIO
LXTV MTDDLETOWN,OfflO
LXV CINCINNATI!, OHIO
LXVI EAU CLAIRE, WISCONSIN
LXVH WAUSAW, WISCONSIN
LXVm GREEN BAY, WISCONSIN
LXIX OSHKOSH, WISCONSIN
LXX MILWAUKEE, WISCONSIN
LXXI RACINE, WISCONSIN
LXXH KENOSHA, WISCONSIN
LXXHI MADISON, WISCONSIN
LXXTV JANESVILLE, WISCONSIN
LXXV BELOIT, WISCONSIN
LXXVI LaCROSSE, WISCONSIN
LXXVn SHEBOYGAN, WISCONSIN
LXXVH APPLETON, WISCONSIN
LXVm CHICAGO, ILLINOIS (CITY OF CHICAGO COMMUNITIES)
Project LEAP GIS Appendix
iii
-------
LIST OF FIGURES
FIGURE PAGE
1 ISCLT Model Results - Gopher Smelter JS
2 Thiessen Polygon Results - Jackson, Michigan ~.&
3 UBK Model Results - Akron, Ohio 11
4 UBK Model Results - Milwaukee, Wisconsin 12
5 UBK Model Results - Jackson, Michigan „ 13
6 UBK Model Results - Terre Haute, Indiana 14
7 UBK Model Results - Duluth, Minnesota 15
8 UBK Model Results - Minneapolis, Minnesota 16
9 UBK Model Results - Cleveland, Ohio 17
10 UBK Model Results - Battle Creek, Michigan 18
11 UBK Model Results - Detroit, Michigan 19
12 UBK Model Results - SL Paul, Minnesota 20
13 UBK Model Results - Cincinnati, Ohio 21
14 UBK Model Results - Chicago, Illinois (North) 22
15 UBK Model Results - Chicago, Illinois (South) 23
16 UBK Model Results - Indianapolis, Indiana .24
17 UBK Model Results - Toledo, Ohio 25
18 UBK Model Results - Chicago, Illinois (North) - City Communities 26
19 UBK Model Results - Chicago, Illinois (South) - City Communities 27
Project LEAP CIS Appendix jv .
-------
1. INTRODUCTION
The effects of lead toxicity on human health has been extensively researched and recognized for
decades. The insidious effects that lead causes on the health of children has received increased attention
in recent years. Due to mouthing behavior, increased uptake of lead compared to adults, nutrition and
other factors, children under seven years of age present a sub-population at increased risk to the adverse
effects of lead exposure.
This study considers the known environmental sources of lead in 83 cities, estimates the
probability distribution of lead in children under seven years of age in each of the cities, and compares
the numbers at risk. The ultimate objective of the study is to estimate the probability distribution of
blood-lead in childhood populations, and then to compare geographic areas to ascertain severity of the
problem. This appendix describes the support that the Geographic Information Management Systems
Office (GISMO) provided to Project LEAP (Lead Education and Abatement Program). This appendix also
presents maps for the communities in the ten cities with the highest number of children with expected high
blood-lead concentrations, and the ten cities expected to have the highest percentages of children with high
blood concentrations. For all cities, tables are provided to relate community areas - derived for the study -
to U.S. Bureau of Census tract areas.
This project required multiple steps of computer analysis in varying computer architecture
environments. One of the objectives of the study was to demonstrate that many of the processes could
be automated and the varying computer architectures could loosely interact Section 2 describes the
steps necessary to move a library of data from one PC to another and produce a second library of
summary files for input to a dispersion model It also describes the process of using a Geographic
Information System (CIS) to compare the modeled results with monitored data.
Sections 3 and 4 describe transferring data from a CIS to a PC environment, using the data for
input to a Uptake Biokinetic Model and joining the results of the modelling to the GIS.
Project LEAP GIS Appendix 1
-------
Section 5 describes mapping the results of the UBK model.
2. INDUSTRIAL SOURCE LONG TERM MODEL SUPPORT
Every significant point source of lead did not have an associated ambient air monitoring station,
consequently, the ISCLT model was used to estimate ground level concentrations from stack emissions
and meteorological data.
Geographic Information System Management Office (GISMO) support to Project LEAP consisted
of obtaining a library of meteorological data for input to the model, producing GIS ARC/Info coverages
of the results, and utilizing GIS to compare modelled surrogate concentrations with ambient air
concentrations.
2.1. Meteorological Data Support (Obtaining Data)
The Region 5 GISMO office developed a procedure to interface the National Weather Service
(NWS) data to the EPA ISCLT model. The ISCLT model requires as input surface and upper air
meteorological data. For each of the seventeen facilities modeled, the meteorological data from the closest
surface and upper air station were obtained. The data were available through the Technology Transfer
Network (TTN) of The Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards (OAQPS). OAQPS obtained the
data from the NWS National Climatic Data Center (NCDQ.
A library of raw observations were obtained from Region 5 NWS monitoring stations by
transferring the archived files from the TNN. The IBM-PC environment was subsequently used to process
the data to the format required by the ISCLT model. A second library was produced of all the processed
meteorological data.
22. Meteorological Data Support (Processing data)
Three arrays of meteorological data are necessary to execute the ISCLT model. They are:
1. Joint frequency of occurrence of wind-speed and wind-direction categories classified
according to the Pasquill stability categories. The arrays were created using the STAR
Project LEAP GIS Appendix 2 .
-------
(stability array) program provided by TNN.
2. Array of average ambient air temperatures was classified according to season and
stability category. The array was generated using a procedure written using the Statistical
Analysis System (SAS). SAS Proc Means procedure was used to output the averages to
a second SAS file, which a SAS procediure was used to generate a formatted file required
by the ISCLT model.
3. The same procedure was used to generate an array of median mixing heights classified
according to wind speed, stability and season, except using Proc Univariate instead of
means.
2.3. Create CIS Coverages from ISCLT Modelling Results
The output from the ISCLT model consists of cartesian coordinates and ground level concentrations of
lead. For convenience, we chose Universe Transverse Mercator (UTM) coordinates as output from the
model and input to the Geographic Information System (CIS) software. UTM coordinates were the most
convenient to use because the facilities are located using UTM coordinates, the ISCLT model uses meters,
and the CIS accepts UTM projection data.
The Statistical Analysis System (SAS) was used to pre-process the output from the ISCLT model
prior to input to GIS. SAS also produced contour plots for reviewing the model results.
The GISMO office utilized Dbase in Plus to automate many of the steps necessary to produce a
GIS coverage. From the SAS output, Dbase m files were generated for each of the seventeen modelled
facilities. A Dbase procedure was written to group the data into the three UTM zones in Region S, and
to produce formatted files for input to ARC/INFO. The Dbase procedure also wrote Arc Macro Language
programs (AMLs) that produced the GIS coverages.
Project LEAP GIS Appendix
-------
2.4. Comparing Modelled and Monitored Data
Ambient air quality data were obtained from the Aerometric Information Retrieval System Air
Quality Subsystem (AIRS) and produced into OIS point coverages. The procedure consisted of generating
formatted files from AIRS, transferring the data to the PC environment, creating Dbase files, and executing
a Dbase procedure that wrote an AML that would produce a GIS ARC/INFO point coverage. The Dbase
procedure standardizes the format of latitude and longitude, and verifies the cartesian coordinates arc
within Region 5.
The monitored and modelled data were compared by finding the closest modelled location to the
air monitoring locations. An ARC/INFO file was produced that included the AIRS identification number,
the distance to the nearest modelled point, the name of the facility, the monitored yearly mean and the
modelled yearly mean for 1988. The contours of the modelled results as well as the location of the
monitored site is shown as figure 1.
3. DEMOGRAPHIC DATA SUPPORT
Because children are at elevated risk, project LEAP used a targeted population of children under
seven years of age, and [women of child bearing age as a surrogate for] the fetus. Within this population
group, African-American and Hispanic children were particularly targeted in recognition of increased body
burden susceptibility and thus vulnerability to the uptake and effects of lead exposure. Project LEAP
required demographic data that could provide information concerning ethnicity, age, income, housing age
and location.
3.1. Choices in Demographic Data
EPA has acquired demographic data to support the program offices across the Agency in their risk-
based decision making processes. Most of EPA's demographic data was obtained from the U.S. Census
Bureau; however, some data was obtained from private vendors.
The Census Bureau collects demographic information during a decennial census derived either
Project LEAP GIS Appendix 4
-------
FIGURE 1
ISCLT Model Results
Gopher Smelter
D
ISCLT modeled lead concentration*
units In ug/cublc meter
< .40
.41 to .70
.71 to 110
111 to 150
> 150
Ambient Air Monitoring Site
0 400
Meters
800 1200
Emissions and meterologjcd
data for Input to theTJSCLT
modd are from 1988.
USfM ItCION ¥
ItK*l DMllM
Ct«f raiblc liltnuttoi:
WMMMll OfflM
Minnesota
Dakota Co.
S
I
B
-------
from the Short-Form or Long-Form questionnaire. Short-Form data is referred to as 100 percent data,
because it is asked of the entire population. Long-Form is referred to as sampled data because it is
collected from approximately 1 out of 6 households.
Private vendors provide data not available from the Census Bureau, such as projections of
population counts beyond the current available census. This is estimated data derived from Census Bureau
data and growth indicators.
The National Census structure for urban areas consists of blocks, block groups, tracts, counties,
states, census divisions, census regions and the total United States.
Access to EPA demographic related data products is provided through the Geographic Resources
Information and Data System (GRIDS). During the initial analysis phase of Project LEAP, the
demographic data available through GRIDS consisted of 1980 Bureau of Census data and Donnelley
Marketing Population Data (1970, 1980, 1990 estimated, 1995 estimated).
32. Choosing Donnelley Data
Because Project LEAP used 1988 environmental data, it was necessary to use Donnelley
Marketing Population Data estimated for 1990 as the demographic data most representative of the
exposure period.
Donnelley Marketing Population data contains information on sex, age, race, housing and income. The
geographic data available for the Donnelley data consists of the centroid of the block group.
3 J. Creating Polygon Coverages from Point Data
From the centroid of the block group it was necessary for Project LEAP to produce polygons at
the community level. The first step was to create a point coverage from the centroid of the block groups.
From the block group point coverages thiessen polygons were produced. Thiessen polygons are created
by joining every point to its neighbors, bisecting the resulting lines, drawing perpendicular lines at the
Project LEAF CIS Appendix 6 .
-------
bisected points and creating polygons from the intersected lines. Figure 2 is an example of the generation
of thiessen polygons from block group point data.
3.4. Creating LEAP Communities
The Bureau of Census defines areas by block, block group, tract and place. In general a census
tract has a population of about 4,000 people and a place would be an entire city population. Because
Project LEAP analysis is at the community level, it was necessary to subdivide cites in larger areas than
census tracts. Groups or aggregates of tracts were created to form the LEAP communities.
The procedure developed to define LEAP communities was performed in the PC architecture
environment using DBase m plus. The first step in developing communities was to create Dbase files
of the Donnelley data at the block group level. ARC/INFO files of the Donnelley data were used to
generate formatted files that were subsequently transferred to a PC and appended to a Dbase structure.
The block group data were sorted by county and tract and a simple procedure written to count the tracts
and replace the integer to a new field. Groups of ten census tracts became LEAP communities.
Figure 2 illustrates the entire process of creating the census tract point coverage, the thiessen
polygons of block groups and the dissolving to LEAP communities.
4. UPTAKE BIOKINETIC MODEL RESULTS
The UBK model used environmental concentrations and demographic information to determine
the percentage of exceedance of expected blood-lead for each community. The percentage, applied against
the population data for the community, provided an estimate of children at risk.
4.1. Summarizing the Demographic Data for the UBK Analysis
Dbase m was used to total the demographic data from the block group level to the community
level and write the results to a second Dbase file. Subsequently the Dbase demographic file was imported
into Lotus and used in obtaining input parameters for the UBK model and in determining the number of
children at risk.
Project LEAP CIS Appendix 7 .
-------
FIGURE 2
Thiessen Polygon Results
Jackson, Mi.
JW«»»«n poljfgoraar«Mnarat«d
**K* P*T»
_
pons.
flTbi»«Ct«d.QRd
Inn fl'QWII Ot tM
r. -._
polyoons or
tn* MMCtklQ
ore
lQ blM IDMt.
U\A
Polygora
ConviuiltlM
KaONV
bilrawMflltl SdtKM DhUM
SplNH
(HHu
oo
I
-------
4.2. Creating ARC/INFO CIS Coverages from the UBK Model Results
The analysis to determine the percentage and number of children at risk was calculated using
Lotus and the results exported to a Dbase HI file. Based on the expected percentages of children to have
blood-lead levels greater than 10 pg/dL Pb-B, the LEAP communities were assigned one of five group
numbers. The group numbers were associated with a shade symbol used to create the maps of the cities.
A Dbase m procedure was used to write an AML that created an INFO file of the UBK results. Using
the LEAP community identification number as a relational field, the INFO polygon attribute file was
joined to the file of results of the UBK model.
5. Producing Maps of the UBK Model Results
Maps were produced for the 10 top ranked cities by percentile of children exceeding
lOug/dL Pb-B and for the 10 top ranked cities for number of expected children exceeding 10 ug/dL PB-B.
5.1. Choosing UBK Map Features
The features in the map displays included the LEAP community borders, county borders, state
borders and shading the communities based on the percentage of children with modeled blood-lead
concentrations exceeding lOug/dL Pb-B.
52. Choosing the UBK Categories
The range and distribution of UBK results were used to determine the number of categories and
the break points for the categories. It was decided to have five categories. The highest category was
defined at greater than 21, since few communities had percentages greater than 21. There are two
categories less than the lOug/dL Pb-B and three categories greater than the lOug/dL Pb-B.
5 J Designing the Color Shades for the Communities
The color shades for the communities with greater man lOug/dL Pb-B were done using three
progressively darker shades of red. The two shades less than lOug/dL Pb-B were done in green and
yellow.
Project LEAP CIS Appendix 9 .
-------
6. Maps of LEAP Communities
Figures 3 through 16 consist of maps of Region 5 cities with the highest modelled blood lead
concentrations. The integer within each community indicates its assigned identification number. A table
follows each map listing the census tracts within every community. Following the maps are tables for the
remaining central cities for which the UBK model was run.
Project LEAP CIS Appendix 10
-------
FIGURE 3
UBK Model Results
Akron, Oh.
percent children with modeled
blood lead > 10 ug/DI
5
to 10
to 15
to 20
_ 21
QNot in study area
[7\7] Communities
l/*v71 State Borders
[7^7] County Borders
221 LEAP Community
Environmental data for Input to
the UBK model are from 1988.
Details concerning census tracts
comprising communities * and ,
summaries of demographic data
are included in tables.
USEMIECIONV
bvlroMMtil Sdeicti Dlvlita
Ctographlc lilomtloi Spiral
Miugratit OHIo
-------
FIGURE 4
UBK Model Results
Milwaukee, Wi.
percent children with modeled
blood lead > 10 ug/DI
D< 5
D 6 to 10
H11 to 15
H16 to 20
• > 21
GNot in study area
l/\/l Communities
[7\7\ State Borders
I/VI County Borders
50 LEAP Community
Environmental data for Input to
the UBK model are from^98&
Detail concerning ceneue tracts
comprising communities and
summaries of demographic data
are Included In tables.
OSBAIKION V
brirauntil SdtM«
lilwmittoi
offic«
-------
FIGURE 5
UBK Model Results
Jackson, Mi.
percent children with modeled
blood lead > 10 ug/DI
D< 5
H 6 to 10
^11 to 15
H16 to 20
• > 21
QNot in study area
[ATI Communltiee
[7^7\ State Border*
[7^7\ County Border*
45 LEAP Community
Environmental data for Input to
the UBK model are from 1988.
Detafa concerning ceneue tract*
comprieing communitle* and
tummarlee of demographic data
are included in tablee.
UrirwMMtil Jaiiui
HUM
Offlc*
-------
FIGURE 6
UBK Model Results
Terre Haute, In.
percent children with modeled
blood lead > 10 ug/DI
D< 5
n 6 to 10
H11 to 15
H16 to 20
• > 21
QNot in study area
[7\7\ Communities
[7S71 State Border*
County Bordere
LEAP Community
Environmental data for Input to
the UBK model ore from M988.
Detale concerning ceneue tracts
comprising communltiee and
summaries of demographic data
are included in tables.
(MfntklC
•«i
OTA TOOK V
SdtMu
«i|««trt Offta
DhWM
SfllMl
••a
S
a
-------
FIGURE 7
UBK Model Results
Duluth, Mn.
percent children with modeled
blood lead > 10 ug/DI
D< 5
H6 to 10
H11 to 15
H16 to 20
• > 21
QNot in study area
[7\7\ Communltlee
[7S71 State Border*
[7^71 County Bordere
69 LEAP Community
Environmental data for Input to
the UBK model are fromrt988,
Detail concerning ceneue trocte
comprising communities and
eummarlee of demographic data
are Included In tabbe.
-------
FIGURE 8
UBK Model Results
Minneapolis, Mn.
percent children with modeled
blood lead > 10 ug/DI
D< 5
d 6 to 10
H11 to 15
Q16 to 20
• > 21
QNot jn study area
|/\/| Communities
(TSTI State Borders
l/"»/l County Borders
19 LEAP Community
Environmental data for Input to
the UBK model ore from 1988.
Details concerning census tracts
comprising communities and
summaries of demographic data
are included in tables.
UWA IECION V
Jdncti DlrlilM
Cto|r»klc lilomitloi Jplm
•iMyattt OHIct
•a
s
a
a.
V)
hH
a
a.
-------
FIGURE 9
UBK Model Results
Cleveland, Oh.
percent children with modeled
blood lead > 10 ug/DI
D< 5
n 6 to 10
gl 11 to 15
16 to 20
> 21
Not in study area
Communities
State Borders
County Borders
LEAP Community
Environmental data for Input to
the UBK model are from 1988.
Detala concerning ceneue trocte
comprising communities and
summaries of demographic data
are included in tables.
x
••5
s
o.
a.
-------
FIGURE 10
UBK Model Results
Battle Creek, Mi.
percent children with modeled
blood lead > 10 ug/DI
D< 5
E]6 to 10
^11 to 15
@16 to 20
• > 21
DNot in study area
|/\/| Communities
[TsTl State Borders
I/'*/! County Borders
12 LEAP Community
Environmental data for input to
the UBK model are from 1988.
Detals concerning census tracts
comprising communities and
summaries of demographic data
are included in tables.
WOA UCION V
liriraiMitil Sdnat
tMfmhic liUrvitln Spl»i
lhii|«Mil OlHu
X
=3
a.
a.
O
-------
FIGURE 11
UBK Model Results
Detroit, Mi.
percent children with modeled
blood lead > 10 ug/DI
D< 5
El 6 to 10
H11 to 15
Q16 to 20
• > 21
QNot jn study area
[7^71 Communities
[7S71 State Borders
[7*771 County Borders
152 LEAP Community
Environmental data for input to
the UBK model are from 1988.
Detals concerning census tracts
comprising communities and
summaries of demographic data
are Included In tables.
USOA IfOON V
EirlfOIBClUl SdcKtl DhlllM
Cn>|riihlc lilonitln iptin
iHMyaMi OHIO
X
•-5
5
D.
n.
ITi
3
cu
-------
FIGURE 12
UBK Model Results
St. Paul, Mn.
percent children with modeled
blood lead > 10 ug/DI
D< 5
H6 to K)
H11 to 15
B16 to 20
• > 21
GNot in study area
|/\/l Communities
[ATI State Borders
I/VI County Borders
19 LEAP Community
Environmental data for Input to
the UBK model ore fromrt988.
Detail concerning census tracts
comprising communities and
summaries of demographic data
o
(N
§
a
a.
O
-------
FIGURE 13
UBK Model Results
Cincinnati, Oh.
percent children with modeled
blood lead > 10 ug/DI
D< 5
06 to 10
8811 to 15
El 16 to 20
• > 21
QNot in study area
f7\7] Communities
State Borders
County Borders
LEAP Community
Environmental data for input to
the UBK model are from 1988.
Petals concerning census tracts
comprising communities and
summaries of demographic data
are Included In tables.
USOA IECION V
UilroiBiiUl Jdeicti
CMfrwklc lilomitio Splmi
MiiijWit Otlta
S
a.
Q.
<
83
-------
FIGURE 14
UBK Model Results
Chicago, II. (North)
6
percent children with modeled
blood lead > 10 ug/DI
D< 5
m s to 10
H11 to 15
Q16 to 20
• > 21
QNot in study area
Communities
State Borders
7\ County Border*
1 LEAP Community
Environmental data for Input to
the UBK model are fromr£8&
Delate concerning census tracts
comprising communities and
summaries of demographic data
are Included In tables.
USOAIIOONV
6«*jrtiUc liloautloi SplMl
Ofto
K
'•3
£
a.
a.
a
s
I
•?
£
-------
FIGURE 15
UBK Model Results
Chicago, II. (South
/ v ^~>—J *X / * { ^s *
percent children with modeled
blood lead > 10 ug/DI
D< 5
1)6 to K)
to 15
to 20
^ 11
H16
• > 21
G Not in study
[7\7] Communities
area
State Borders
I County Borders
1 LEAP Community
Environmental data for input to
the UBK model are from 1988.
(totals concerning ceneue tracts
comprising communities and
summaries of demographic data
are induced in tobies.
liiM
OSDAUaON V
MMCM
lilonu u«i
Pita
x
'•3
c-
s
i
I
-------
FIGURE 16
UBK Model Results
Indianapolis, In.
percent children with modeled
blood toad > 10 ug/DI
D< 5
n 6 to 10
1311 to 15
H16 to 20
• > 21
QNot in study area
[7*s71 Communities
(7^71 State Border*
(7^71 County Borders
57 LEAP Community
Environmental data for Input to
the UBK model are frorn19a&
Detail concerning census tracts
comprising communities and
summaries of demographic data
are included In tables.
KBA
IKIONV
MMCM
X
••5
s
Q.
-------
FIGURE 17
UBK Model Results
Toledo, Oh.
percent children with modeled
blood lead > K) ug/CH
D< 5
H 6 to 10
H11 to 15
H16 to 20
• > 21
ONot in study area
f7\71 Communities
[7^71 State Borders
fTTTI County Borders
150 LEAP Community
Environmental data for input to
the UBK model ore from 1988.
Detale concerning census tracts
comprising communities and
summaries of demographic data
are induced in tables.
USBAUaONV
briraMMttl MMCU
fiMfntklc Ulonutioi
•
-------
FIGURE 18
UBK Model Results
Chicago, II. (North)
_ - - " '
percent children with modeled
blood lead > 10 ug/DI
D< 5
06 to 10
^11 to 15
Q16 to 20
• > 21
QNot in study area
f7\7l Communities
[ATI State Borders
[7\7] County Borders
1 Community
Environmental data for input to
the UBK model are from 1988.
Detals concerning census tracts
comprising communities and
summaries of demographic data
are included in tables.
CN
IUEM IKION V
UrirMMitil Jdeicti DUblM
C*»|uthlc liloniilloi SpttM
lli»iy»Ml Oflta
x
=3
a.
a.
B
o
c-
w
I
'51
-------
FIGURE 19
UBK Model Results
Chicago, II. (S
percent children with modeled
blood lead > K) ug/DI
D< 5
136 to K)
H11 to 15
@16 to 20
• > 21
QNot in study area
[7\7\ Communities
[7^71 State Borders
[7^71 County Borders
1 Community
Environmental data for Input to
the UBK model are from^988.
Detols concerning censue tracts
comprising communities and
summaries of demographic data
are included in tables.
IBOAUSIOM V
OlrUU.
IbMIM
Otk»
0.
0.
-------
193
22600
22800
22900
23200
194
23300
23400
23500
23600
23700
191
21100
192
21300
21400
21500
21600
21700
21800
21900
22000
22100
22200
TABLE I
Rock Island, Illinois
1980 Census Tracts comprising
LEAP Communities
195
24400
TABLE II
Moline, Illinois
1980 Census Tracts Comprising
LEAP Communities
193
22300
22400
22500
Project LEAP CIS Appendix
28
-------
TABLE III
Chicago, Illinois
1980 Census Tracts Comprising
LEAP Communities
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
201
17
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
25
10
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
301
302
18
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
701
702
26
11
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
19
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
27
12
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
401
20
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
801
802
28
13
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
501
21
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
29
14
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
22
30
33
34
35
36
37
38
15
512
513
514
515
601
602
603
604
605
606
23
31
39
16
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
24
813
814
815
816
817
818
819
901
902
903
1001
1002
1003
1004
1005
1006
1007
1101
1102
1103
1104
1105
1201
1202
1203
1204
1301
1302
1303
1304
32
1305
1401
1402
1403
1404
1405
1406
1407
1408
1501
1502
1503
1504
1505
1506
1507
1508
1509
1510
1511
1512
1601
1602
1603
1604
1605
1606
1607
1608
1609
1610
1611
1612
1613
1701
1702
1703
1704
1705
1706
1707
1708
1709
1710
1711
1801
1802
1803
1901
1902
1903
1904
1905
1906
1907
1908
1909
1910
1911
1912
1913
1914
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2101
2102
2103
2104
2105
2106
2107
2108
2109
2201
2202
2203
40
2204
2205
2206
2207
2208
2209
2210
2211
2212
2213
2214
2215
2216
2217
2218
2219
2220
2221
2222
2223
2224
2225
2226
2227
2228
2229
2301
2302
2303
2304
2305
2306
2307
2308
2309
2310
2311
2312
2313
2314
2315
2316
2317
2318
2401
2402
2403
2404
2405
2406
2407
2408
2409
2410
2411
2412
2413
2414
2415
2416
2417
2418
2419
2420
2421
2422
2423
2424
2425
2426
2427
2428
2429
2430
2431
2432
2433
2434
2435
2436
Project LEAP CIS Appendix
29
-------
49
57
65
73
50
58
66
Chicago, Illinois
1980 Census Tracts Comprising
LEAP Communities
43
44
45
46
51
52
53
54
59
60
61
62
67
68
69
70
75
76
77
78
47
55
63
71
79
48
2501
2502
2503
2504
2505
2506
2507
2506
2509
2510
'2511
2512
2513
2514
2515
2516
2517
2518
2519
2520
2521
2522
2523
2524
2601
2602
2603
2604
2605
2606
2607
2608
2609
2610
2701
2702
2703
2704
2705
2706
2707
2708
2709
2710
2711
2712
2713
2714
2715
2716
2717
2718
2719
2801
2802
2803
2804
2805
2806
2807
2808
2809
2810
2811
2812
2813
2814
2815
2816
2817
2818
2819
2820
2821
2822
2823
2824
2825
2826
2827
56
2828
2829
2830
2831
2832
2833
2834
2835
2836
2837
2838
2839
2840
2841
2842
2843
2901
2902
2903
2904
2905
2906
2907
2908
2909
2910
2911
2912
2913
2914
2915
2916
2917
2918
2919
2920
2921
2922
2923
2924
2925
2926
2927
3001
3002
3003
3004
3005
3006
3007
3008
3009
3010
3011
3012
3013
3014
3015
3016
3017
3018
3019
3020
3101
3102
3103
3104
3105
3106
3107
3108
3109
3110
3111
3112
3113
3114
3115
3201
3202
64
3202
3203
3204
3205
3206
3301
3302
3303
3304
3305
3401
3402
3403
3404
3405
3406
3501
3502
3503
3504
3505
3506
3507
3508
3509
3510
3511
3512
3513
3514
3515
3601
3602
3603
3604
3605
3701
3702
3703
3704
3801
3802
3803
3804
3805
3806
3807
3808
3809
3810
3811
3812
3813
3814
3815
3816
3817
3818
3819
3820
3901
3902
3903
3904
3905
3906
3907
4001
4002
4003
4004
4005
4006
4007
4008
4101
4102
4103
4104
4105
72
4106
4107
4108
4109
4110
4111
4112
4113
4114
4201
4202
4203
4204
4205
4206
4207
4208
4209
4210
4211
4212
4301
4302
4303
4304
4305
4306
4307
4308
4309
4310
4311
4312
4313
4314
4401
4402
4403
4404
4405
4406
4407
4408
4409
4501
4502
4503
4601
4602
4603
4604
4605
4606
4607
4608
4609
4610
4701
4801
4802
4803
4804
4805
4901
4902
4903
4904
4905
4906
4907
4908
4909
4910
4911
4912
4913
4914
5001
5002
5003
80
5101
5102
5103
5104
5105
5105
5201
5202
5203
5203
5204
5205
5206
5301
5302
5303
5304
5305
5306
5401
5501
5502
5601
5602
5603
5604
5605
5606
5607
5608
5609
5610
5611
5612
5613
5701
5702
5703
5704
5705
5801
5802
5803
5804
5805
5806
5807
5808
5809
5810
5811
5901
5902
5903
5904
5905
5906
5907
6001
6002
6003
6004
6005
6006
6007
6008
6009
6010
6011
6012
6013
6014
6015
6016
6101
6102
6103
6104
6105
6106
Project LEAP CIS Appendix
30
-------
Chicago, Illinois
1980 Census Tracts Comprising
LEAP Communities
81
6107
6108
6109
6110
6111
6112
6113
6114
6115
6116
89
6808
6809
6810
6811
6812
6813
6814
6901
6902
6903
82
6117
6118
6119
6120
6121
6122
6201
6202
6203
6204
90
6904
6905
6906
6907
6908
6909
6910
6911
6912
6913
83
6301
6302
6303
6304
6305
6306
6307
6308
6309
6401
91
6914
6915
7001
7002
7003
7004
7005
7101
7102
7103
84
6402
6403
6404
6405
6406
6407
6408
6501
6502
6503
92
7104
7105
7106
7107
7108
7109
7110
7111
7112
7113
85
6504
6505
6601
6602
6603
6604
6605
6606
6607
6608
93
7114
7115
7201
7202
7203
7204
7205
7206
7207
7301
86
6609
6610
6611
6701
6702
6703
6704
6705
6706
6707
94
7302
7303
7304
7305
7306
7307
7401
7402
7403
7404
87
6708
6709
6710
6711
6712
6713
6714
6715
6716
6717
95
7501
7502
7503
7504
7505
7506
7608
88
6718
6719
6720
6601
6802
6803
6804
6805
6806
6807
133
8408
TABLE IV
Kankakee, Illinois
1980 Census Tracts Comprising
LEAP Communities
155
11500
11600
11700
11800
156
12200
12300
12400
12500
TABLE V
Peoria, Illinios
1980 Census Tracts Comprising
LEAP Communities
185
100
200
300
400
500
186
600
700
800
900
1000
1100
1200
1300
1400
1500
187
1600
1700
1800
1900
2000
2100
2200
2300
2400
2500
188
2600
2700
2800
2900
3000
3200
3300
190
4400
Project LEAP CIS Appendix
31.
-------
TABLE VI
Bloomington, Illinois
1980 Census Tracts comprising
LEAP Communities
171 172
1101 1301
1102 1302
1200 1303
1400
1500
1600
1700
1800
1900
2000
TABLE VII
Normal, Illinois
1980 Census Tracts Comprising
LEAP Communities
170 171
101 200
102 301
103 302
400
501
502
503
TABLE VIII
Champaign, Illinois
1980 Census Tracts Comprising
LEAP Communities
234
100 300 1400
200 400
500
600
1000
1100
1201
TABLE IX
Urbana, Illinois
1980 Census Tracts Comprising
LEAP Communities
5100 5800
5200 5900
5600 6000
5700
Project LEAP CIS Appendix 32
-------
TABLE X
201
300
400
202
500
800
900
1000
1100
1200
1300
1400
203
1500
1600
1700
1800
1900
2100
2200
2300
Springfield, Illinois
1980 Census Tracts Comprising
LEAP Communities
204
2500
2600
2800
2900
3000
3100
TABLE XI
E. St. Louis, Illinois
1980 Census Tracts Comprising
LEAP Communities
195
500400
500500
500600
500800
500900
501000
501100
501200
196
501300
501400
200
504201
504202
TABLE XII
Granite City, Illinois
1980 Census Tracts Comprising
LEAP Communities
177
400101
400102
400300
400400
178
400500
400802
TABLE XIII
Rockford, Illinois
1980 Census Tracts Comprising
LEAP Communities
218
401
403
501
219
502
504
506
507
600
700
800
1000
220
1100
1200
1300
1400
1500
1600
1700
1800
1900
221
2100
2301
2400
2500
2600
2700
2800
2900
222
3000
3100
3200
3300
3400
3500
3601
3603
3604
223
3703
Project LEAP CIS Appendix
33
-------
36
10100
10200
10299
37
40
20100
20200
20300
20400
20500
20600
20700
20800
41
20900
21000
21100
21200
21300
21400
21500
21600
21700
21800
TABLE XIV
Gary, Indiana
1980 Census Tracts Comprising
LEAP Communities
38
39
10300
10400
10500
10600
10700
10800
10900
11000
11100
11200
11300
11400
11500
11600
11700
11800
11900
12000
12100
12200
12300
12400
12500
12600
12700
12800
12900
13000
13100
13200
40
13300
13400
44
41100
41200
41301
TABLE XV
Hammond, Indiana
1980 Census Tracts Comprising
LEAP Communities
42
30100
30200
30300
30399
30400
30499
30500
30600
30700
30800
43
30900
31000
TABLE XVI
E. Chicago, Indiana
1980 Census Tracts Comprising
LEAP Communities
Project LEAP CIS Appendix
34.
-------
TABLE XVII
81
100
200
301
302
400
500
600
700
800
82
900
1000
1100
1200
1300
1400
1500
1600
1700
1800
South Bend, Indiana
1980 Census Tracts Comprising
LEAP Communities
83
1900
2000
2100
2200
2300
2400
2500
2600
2700
2800
84
2900
3000
3100
3200
3300
3400
3500
85
11100
87
11900
84
10100
10200
10300
85
10400
10500
10600
10700
20
1500
21
1600
1800
2200
2300
2400
2500
TABLE XVIII
Mishawaka, Indiana
1980 Census Tracts Comprising
LEAP Communities
86
11501
11502
11503
11701
TABLE XIX
Elkhart, Indiana
1980 Census Tracts Comprising
LEAP Communities
22
2600
2700
2800
TABLE XX
Ft. Wayne, Indiana
1980 Census Tracts Comprising
LEAP Communities
100
300
400
500
600
701
702
800
900
1000
1100
1200
1300
1400
1500
1600
1700
1800
1900
2000
2100
2200
2300
2400
2500
2600
2700
2800
3000
3100
3200
3301
3302
3303
3400
3500
3600
3700
3800
3901
3902
4000
4101
4102
4200
10701
10702
10805
11302
11303
11304
Project LEAP CIS Appendix
35
-------
TABLE XXI
89
100
200
300
400
600
700
31
100
200
300
500
700
800
50
100
200
300
400
500
600
16
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
901
90
800
900
1000
1100
1200
1400
1500
1600
32
900
1000
1100
1200
51
700
800
900
1000
1100
1200
1500
1600
17
902
1000
1100
1200
1300
1400
1500
1600
1700
1901
LaFayette, Indiana
1980 Census Tracts Comprising
LEAP Communities
91
1900
TABLE XXII
Kokomo, Indiana
1980 Census Tracts Comprising
LEAP Communities
TABLE XXIII
Anderson, Indiana
1980 Census Tracts Comprising
LEAP Communities
52
1700
1800
1900
2000
TABU XXIV
Muncie, Indiana
1989 Census Tracts Comprising
LEAP Communities
IB
1902
2000
Project LEAP CIS Appendix
36
-------
TABLE XXV
98
100
200
300
Indianapolis, Indiana
1980 Census Tracts Comprising
LEAP Communities
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
310101
310102
310200
310301
310302
320101
320102
320103
62
342400
342500
342600
350100
350200
350300
350400
350500
350600
350700
70
361100
361200
361300
361400
370100
370201
370202
370300
380100
320104
320201
320202
320301
320302
320400
320500
320600
320700
320800
63
350800
350900
351000
351100
351200
351500
351600
351700
351900
352100
71
380200
380300
380501
380502
380600
380700
380800
380900
320901
320902
320903
321001
321002
321100
321200
321300
321400
321600
64
352300
352400
352500
352600
352700
352800
353100
353200
353300
353500
72
381001
381002
381101
381102
381201
381202
390100
390200
390300
390400
321700
321800
321900
322000
322100
322200
322300
322400
322500
322600
65
353600
353800
353900
354100
354200
354400
354500
354700
354800
354900
322700
330101
330102
330402
330500
66
355000
355100
355300
355400
355500
355600
355700
355900
356200
356300
330801
330802
330900
331000
340101
340102
340104
340200
67
356400
356900
357000
357100
357200
357300
357400
357600
357800
•
340300
340400
340500
340600
340700
341100
341200
68
357900
358000
358100
360101
360102
360201
360202
360301
360302
360401
341400
341500
341600
341700
341901
341902
342000
342100
342200
342300
69
360402
360403
360502
360601
360602
360800
360900
361000
TABLE XXVI
Terre Haute, Indiana
1980 Census Tracts Comprising
LEAP Communities
99
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
1100
1200
1300
100
1400
1500
1600
1700
1800
1900
Project LEAP CIS Appendix
37 •
-------
TABLE XXVII
Bloomington, Indiana
1980 Census Tracts Comprising
LEAP Communities
74
100
201
202
301
75
302
400
500
600
901
902
TABLE XXVIII
Evansvilie, Indiana
1980 Census Tracts Comprising
LEAP Communities
93
100
202
300
400
500
600
800
94
900
1000
1100
1200
1300
1400
1500
1600
1700
1800
95
1900
2000
2100
2200
2300
2400
2500
2600
2700
2800
96
2900
3000
3100
3200
3300
3400
350.0
3600
3701
3702
97
3900
10202
TABLE »»'«
New Albany, Indiana
1980 Census Tracts Comprising
LEAP Communities
22
70200
70301
23
70302
70400
70500
70600
70700
70801
70802
70900
Project LEAP CIS Appendix
38
-------
TABLE XXX
Saginaw, Michigan
1980 Census Tracts Comprising
LEAP Communities
124 125 126
100 300 1300
200 400 1400
500 1500
600 1600
700 1700
800 1800
900 1900
1000 2000
1100 2100
1200
TABLE XXXI
Bay City, Michigan
Census Tracts Comprising
LEAP Communities
345
100 300 1300
200 400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
1100
1200
TABLE XXXII
Midland, Michigan
1980 Census Tracts Comprising
LEAP Communities
88
100
200
300
400
700
TABLE XXXIII
Muskegon, Michigan
1980 Census Tracts Comprising
LEAP Communities
93 94 96
200 400 2100
300 500
601
602
700
800
900
1000
1099
Project LEAP CIS Appendix 39 .
-------
54
35
37
2901
55
36
39
3801
3802
3901
3902
4000
4100
4200
TABLE XXXIV
Grand Rapids, Michigan
1980 Census Tracts Comprising
LEAP Communities
56
57
SB
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
1200
1300
1400
1500
1600
1700
1800
1900
2000
2100
2200
2300
2400
2500
2600
2700
2800
2900
3000
3100
3200
3300
3400
3500
3600
3700
3800
3900
4000
4100
4200
4300
4400
4500
4600
TABLE XXXV
Lansing, Michigan
1980 Census Tracts Comprising
LEAP Communities
37
38
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
1100
1200
1300
1400
1500
1600
1701
1702
1900
2000
2100
2200
2300
2400
2500
2600
2700
2800
2902
3000
3102
3200
3301
3302
3400
3601
39
3602
3700
41
5100
5200
5303
TABLE XXXVI
East Lansing, Michigan
1980 Census Tracts Comprising
LEAP Communities
40
4302
4401
4402
4403
4500
Project LEAF CIS Appendix
40
-------
TABLE XXXVII
Flint, Michigan
1980 Census Tracts Comprising
LEAP Communities
22 23 24 25 26 27
100 300 1300 2300 3300 4200
200 400 1400 2400 3401 4300
500 1500 2500 3402 4400
600 1600 2600 3500 4500
700 1700 2700 3600 4600
800 1800 2800 3700 4700
900 1900 2900 3800
1000 2000 3000 3900
1100 2100 3100 4000
1200 2200 3200 4100
Project LEAP CIS Appendix 41
-------
145
TABLE XXXVIII
Detroit, Michigan
1980 Census Tracts Comprising
LEAP Communities
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
500100
500200
500300
500400
153
511400
511500
511600
511700
512100
512200
512300
512400
512500
512600
161
521100
521200
521300
521400
521500
521600
521700
521800
521900
522000
169
533100
533200
533300
533400
533500
533600
533700
534100
534200
534300
500500
500600
500700
500800
500900
501000
501100
501200
501300
501400
154
512700
512800
512900
513000
513100
513200
513300
513400
513500
513600
162
522100
522200
522300
522400
523100
523200
523300
523400
523500
523600
170
534400
534500
534600
534700
534800
534900
535000
535100
535200
535300
501500
501600
501700
501800
501900
502000
503100
503200
503300
503400
155
513700
513800
513900
514000
514100
514200
514300
514400
514500
514600
163
523700
523800
523900
524000
524100
524200
524300
524400
524500
524599
171
535400
535500
536100
536200
536300
536400
536500
536600
536700
536800
503500
503600
503700
503800
503900
504000
504100
504200
504300
504400
156
514700
514800
514900
515000
515100
515200
515300
515400
515500
515600
164
524600
524699
524700
524800
525100
525200
525300
525400
525500
525600
172
536900
537000
537100
537200
537300
537400
537500
537600
538100
538200
504500
504600
504700
504800
504900
505000
505100
506100
506200
506300
157
515700
516100
516200
516300
516400
516500
516599
516600
516700
516800
165
525700
525800
525900
526000
526100
526200
526300
526400
526500
526600
173
538300
538400
538500
538600
538700
538800
538900
539000
539100
539200
506400
506500
506600
506700
506800
506900
507000
507100
507200
507300
15 B
516900
517000
517100
517200
517300
517400
517500
517600
517700
517800
166
530100
530200
530300
530400
530500
530600
530700
530800
530900
531000
174
539300
539400
539500
539600
539700
540100
540200
540300
540400
540500
507400
507500
507600
507700
507800
507900
508000
510100
510200
510300
159
517900
518000
518100
518200
518300
518400
518500
518600
518700
518800
167
531100
531200
531300
531400
531500
531600
531700
531800
531900
532000
175
540600
540700
540800
540900
541000
541100
541200
541300
541400
541500
510400
510500
510600
510700
510800
510900
511000
511100
511200
511300
160
520100
520200
520300
520400
520500
520600
520700
520800
520900
521000
16 B
532100
532200
532300
532400
532500
532600
532700
532800
532900
533000
176
541600
542100
542200
542300
542400
542500
542600
542700
542800
542900
Project LEAP CIS Appendix
42
-------
Detroit, Michigan
1980 Genius Tract* Comprising
LEAP Conmunitias
177
543000
543100
543200
543300
543400
543500
543600
543700
543800
543900
178
544000
544100
544200
544300
545100
545200
545300
545400
545500
545600
137
100
200
300
400
500
138
600
700
800
901
1101
1104
12
100
200
300
400
500
600
13
900
1300
179
545700
545800
545900
546000
546100
546200
546300
546400
546500
546600
180
546700
546800
546900
TABLE XXZZX
Ann Arbor, Michigan
1980 Census Tracts Comprising
LEAP Communities
139
1200
1305
1401
1402
140
1502
1600
1701
1801
1802
1903
TABLE XL
Battle Creek, Michigan
1980 Census Tracts Comprising
LEAP Communities
14
2600
TABLE ZLX
Jackson, Michigan
1980 Census Tracts Comprising
LEAP Communities
44
100
200
300
45
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
1100
1200
1300
Project LEAP CIS Appendix
43
-------
TABLE XLII
47
100
48
201
202
300
401
402
500
600
700
801
802
Kalamazoo, Michigan
1980 Census Tracts Comprising
LEAP Communities
49 50
900 1504
1000 1506
1100 1507
1200 1601
1401 1603
1604
1701
1702
1801
1802
TABLE XLIII
Benton Harbor, Michigan
1980 Census Tracts Comprising
LEAP Communities
6
300
400
500
600
TABLE XLXV
Moorhead, Minnesota
1980 Census Tracts Comprising
LEAP Communities
20100
10
20201
20202
20300
20400
20500
20600
TABLE XLV
Duluth, Minnesota
1980 Census Tracts Comprising
LEAP Communities
6B
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
69
1000
1100
1200
1300
1400
1600
1700
1800
1900
1999
70
2000
2200
2299
2300
2400
2500
2599
2600
2700
2800
71
2899
2900
3000
3100
3200
3299
3300
3400
3600
3700
72
3800
Project LEAP CIS Appendix
44
-------
6
21200
18
26
54
77
31400
100
19
55
TABLE XLVT
St. Cloud, Minnesota
1980 Census Tracts Comprising
LEAP Communities
78
200
300
400
600
700
800
1000
TABLE XLVII
Minneapolis, Minnesota
1980 Census Tracts Comprising
LEAP Communities
20
21
22
23
28
29
30
7500
7600
7700
7800
7900
8000
8100
8200
8300
8400
8500
8600
8700
8800
8900
9000
9100
9200
9300
9400
9500
9600
9700
9800
9900
10000
10100
10200
10300
10400
10500
10600
10700
10800
10900
11000
11100
11200
11300
11400
11500
11600
11701
11702
11800
11900
12001
12002
12101
12102
TABLE ZLVHI
St. Paul, Minnesota
1980 Census Tracts Comprising
LEAP Communities
56
57
58
59
24
60
25
101
102
200
300
400
500
601
602
700
800
900
1000
1100
1200
1300
1400
1500
1600
1700
1800
1900
2000
2100
2200
2300
2400
2500
2600
2700
2800
2900
3000
3100
3200
3300
3400
3500
3600
3700
3800
3900
4000
4100
4200
4300
4400
4500
4601
4602
4700
4800
4900
5000
5100
5200
5300
5400
5500
5600
5700
5800
5900
6000
6100
6200
6300
6400
6500
6600
6700
6800
6900
7000
7100
7200
7300
7400
61
30100
30200
30300
30400
30500
30601
30602
30702
30703
30704
30800
30900
31000
31100
31200
31300
31400
31500
31600
31700
31801
31802
31900
32000
32100
32200
32300
32400
32500
32600
32700
32800
32900
33000
33100
33200
33300
33400
33500
33600
33700
33800
33900
34000
34200
34400
34500
34601
34602
34701
34702
34800
34900
35000
35100
35200
35300
35400
35500
35600
35700
35800
35900
36000
36100
36200
36300
36400
36500
36600
36700
36800
36900
37000
37100
Project LEAP CIS Appendix
45
-------
St. Paul, Minnesota
1980 Census Tracts Comprising
LEAP Communities
62
37200
37401
37402
37500
37601
37602
TABLE XLXX
Rochester, Minnesota
1980 Census Tracts Comprising
LEAP Communities
50
100
200
300
400
500
600
51
800
1000
1100
148
200
300
400
600
700
800
149
900
1000
1100
1201
1202
1301
1302
1303
1304
1400
TABLE L
Toledo, Ohio
1980 Census Tracts Comprising
LEAP Communities
150
1500
1600
1700
1800
1900
2000
2100
2200
2300
2401
151
2402
2500
2600
2700
2800
2900
3000
3100
3200
3300
152
3400
3500
3600
3700
3800
3900
4000
4100
4200
4301
153
4302
4400
4501
4503
4504
4600
4699
4701
4702
4799
154
4800
4899
4900
5000
5100
5200
5300
5400
5501
5502
155
5503
5599
5600
5701
5702
5703
5801
5802
5901
5902
156
6000
6100
6200
6300
6400
6500
6600
6700
6800
6900
157
7202
7203
7205
7300
7400
158
7500
7700
7800
7901
7902
159
8301
8500
8600
Project LEAP CIS Appendix
46
-------
26
215
TABLE LI
Cleveland, Ohio
1980 Census Tracts Comprising
LEAP Communities
27
29
30
31
32
TABLE LII
Akron, Ohio
1980 Census Tracts Comprising
LEAP Communities
216
217
218
219
220
221
501100
501200
501301
501302
501400
501500
501600
501700
501800
501900
502101
502102
502200
502300
502400
502500
502600
502700
502800
503100
503200
503300
503400
503500
503600
503701
503702
503800
504100
504200
504300
504400
504500
504600
504700
504800
505100
505200
505300
505400
505500
505600
505700
505800
505900
506100
506200
506302
506303
506304
506400
506500
506600
506700
506800
506900
507101
507102
507201
507202
507203
507300
507400
507500
507600
33
101100
101200
101300
101400
101500
101600
101700
34
109199
109200
109300
109600
109700
109800
109900
110100
110200
110300
42
118200
118300
118400
118500
118600
118700
118800
118900
119100
119200
101800
101900
102100
102200
102300
102400
102500
102600
102700
102800
35
110400
110500
110600
110700
110800
110900
111100
111200
111300
111400
43
119300
119400
119500
119600
119700
119800
119900
120100
120200
120300
102900
103100
103200
103299
103300
103399
103400
103500
103600
103700
36
111500
111600
111700
111800
111900
112100
112200
112300
112400
112500
44
120400
120500
120600
120700
120800
120900
121100
121200
121300
121400
103800
103900
104100
104200
104299
104300
104400
104500
104600
104700
37
112600
112700
112800
112900
113100
113200
113300
113400
113500
113600
45
121500
121600
121700
121800
121900
122100
122200
122300
123100
123200
104799
104800
104900
105100
105200
105300
105400
105500
105600
105700
38
113700
113800
113900
114100
114200
114300
114400
114500
114600
114700
46
123300
123400
123500
123600
123700
123800
123900
124100
124200
124300
105800
105900
106100
106200
106300
106400
106500
106600
106700
107100
39
114800
114900
115100
115200
115300
115400
115500
115600
115700
115800
47
124400
124500
124600
126100
107199
107200
107300
107400
107500
107600
107699
107700
107800
107900
40
115900
116100
116200
116300
116400
116500
116600
116700
116800
116900
108100
108200
108300
108400
108500
108600
108700
108800
108900
109100
41
117100
117200
117300
117400
117500
117600
117700
117800
117900
118100
Project LEAP CIS Appendix
47
-------
TABLE LXII
141
22100
22200
22299
142
22300
22399
22400
22500
22601
22800
22900
23000
206
700100
700200
700300
700400
207
700500
700600
700700
700800
701000
701100
701200
701300
701400
127
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
12 8
900
1000
Lorain, Ohio
1980 Census Tracts Comprising
LEAP Communities
143
23099
23100
23199
23200
23300
23400
23500
23600
23700
23800
144
23000
24000
24100
24200
TABLE LXV
Canton, Ohio
1980 Census Tracts Comprising
LEAP Communities
208
701500
701600
701700
701800
701900
702000
702100
702400
209
702500
702600
TABLE LV
Steubenville, Ohio
1980 Census Tracts Comprising
LEAP Communities
Project LEAP CIS Appendix
48
-------
TABLE LVI
162
800100
800200
800300
163
800400
800500
800600
800700
800800
800900
801000
801100
801200
801300
226
920100
920200
227
920400
920600
920800
920900
921000
921100
Youngstown, Ohio
1980 Census Tracts Comprising
LEAP Communities
164
801400
801500
801600
801700
801800
801900
802000
802100
802200
802300
165
802400
802500
802600
802701
802702
802800
802900
803000
803100
803200
166
803300
803400
803500
803600
803700
803800
803900
804000
804100
804200
167
804300
230
931800
TABLE LVIZ
Warren, Ohio
1980 Census Tracts Comprising
LEAP Communities
228
921600
231
932900
933100
TABLE LVIII
Mansfield, Ohio
1980 Census Tracts Comprising
LEAP Communities
200
100
2QO
300
400
500
201
600
700
800
900
1000
1100
1200
1300
1400
Project LEAP CIS Appendix
49
-------
TABLE LIX
Lima, Ohio
1980 Census Tracts Comprising
LEAP Communities
10900
11800
12200
12300
12500
12600
12700
12800
177
100
200
178
190
eoioo
60300
18
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
901
902
191
70202
70300
19
1000
1101
1102
1200
1400
1500
1600
1800
12900
13100
13200
13300
13400
13500
13600
13700
13800
TABLE LX
Dayton, Ohio
1980 Census Tracts Comprising
LEAP Communities
179
180
181
182
183
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
1100
1200
1300
1402
1500
1600
1700
1900
2000
2200
2300
2400
2500
2600
2700
2800
2900
3000
3100
3200
3300
3400
3500
3600
3700
3800
3900
4000
4100
4200
4300
4400
4600
4700
4800
4900
5000
5100
5200
5300
5401
5402
5500
5600
5700
5900
6000
6100
6300
184
6400
6500
6600
192
80700
90300
90400
90600
TABLE LXC
Springfield, Ohio
1980 Census Tracts Comprising
LEAP Communities
20
2100
Project LEAP CIS Appendix
50
-------
TABLE LXII
72
110
120
210
220
320
73
COLUMBUS, OHIO
1980 Census Tracts Comprising
LEAP Communities
74
75
76
77
78
79
330
410
420
500
600
710
720
730
810
820
910
920
1000
1110
1120
1200
1300
1400
1500
1600
1700
1810
1820
1900
2000
2100
2200
2300
2400
2520
2710
2720
2730
2740
2750
2760
2770
2780
2800
2900
3000
3100
3200
3300
3400
3500
3600
3700
3800
3900
4000
4100
4200
4300
4400
4610
4620
4700
4810
4820
4900
5000
5100
5200
5300
5410
5420
80
5500
5610
5620
5700
5810
5820
5900
6000
6100
81
6321
6352
6353
6360
82
6370
6392
83
6821
6822
6823
6830
6921
6923
84
6924
6931
6932
6933
6941
6942
6943
85
7130
86
7410
7490
7511
7512
87
7520
7533
7710
7721
88
7722
7730
7820
89
8130
90
91
92
93
94
95
8291
8312
8321
8322
8340
8350
8360
8391
8710
8720
8730
8740
8811
8812
8813
8814
8821
8824
8825
9210
9311
9312
9321
9322
9323
9325
9326
9331
9332
9333
9334
9336
9337
9361
9371
9372
9373
9381
88
7722
7730
7820
89
8130
90
91
92
93
94
95
8291
8312
8321
8322
8340
8350
8360
8391
8710
8720
8730
8740
8811
8812
8813
8814
8821
8824
8825
9210
9311
9312
9321
9322
9323
9325
9326
9331
9332
9333
9334
9336
9337
9361
9371
9372
9373
9381
96
9386
9410
9430
97
9750
Project LEAP CIS Appendix
51
-------
TABLE LZIII
9
100
14
11300
12200
12300
12400
104
112
10
200
300
400
500
600
701
702
800
900
1001
15
12500
12600
12700
12800
12900
13000
13100
13200
13300
13400
105
113
Hamilton, Ohio
1980 Census Tracts Comprising
LEAP Communities
11
1002
1100
1200
1300
1400
TABLE LXXV
Middletown, Ohio
1980 Census Tracts Comprising
LEAP Communities
16
13500
13800
TABLE LXV
Cincinnati, Ohio
1980 Census Tracts Comprising
LEAP Communities
106
107
108
109
110
111
100
200
301
302
400
600
700
800
900
1000
1100
1200
1300
1400
1500
1600
1700
1800
1900
2000
2100
2200
2300
2500
2600
2700
2800
2900
3000
3200
3300
3400
3500
3600
3700
3800
3900
4000
4100
4200
4300
4400
4500
4603
4701
4702
4800
4900
5000
5100
5200
5300
5400
5500
5600
5701
5800
5900
6000
6100
6201
6202
6300
6400
6500
6600
6700
6800
6900
7000
114
115
116
7100
7200
7300
7400
7500
7700
7800
7900
8000
8201
8202
8300
8400
8501
8502
8601
8700
8800
8900
9100
9200
9300
9400
9500
9600
9700
9800
9901
9902
10001
10002
10201
10202
10300
10400
10500
10600
10700
10800
10900
11000
11100
119
21401
120
22200
Project LEAP CIS Appendix
52
-------
TABLE LXVI
Eau Claire, Wisconsin
1980 Census Tracts Comprising
LEAP Communities
6 19 20
10100 500 1400
700 1500
800
1000
1100
1200
1300
TABLE LXVXI
Wausaw, Wisconsin
1980 Census Tracts Comprising
LEAP Communities
32 33
100 700
200 800
500
TABLE LZVUI
Greenbay, Wisconsin
1980 Census Tracts Comprising
LEAP Communities
100 200 900 1900
301 1000 2000
302 1100
303 1200
401 1300
402 1400
500 1500
600 1600
700 1700
800 1801
TABLE LUX
Oshkosh, Wisconsin
1980 Census Tracts Comprising
LEAP Communities
91 92
100 1000
200 1100
300 1200
400 1300
500 1400
600 1500
700
800
900
Project LEAF CIS Appendix 53
-------
35
36
44
TABLE LXX
Milwaukee, Wisconsin
1980 Census Tracts Comprising
LEAP Communities
37
38
39
45
46
47
48
41
49
42
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
1100
1200
1300
1400
1500
1600
1700
1800
1900
2000
2100
2200
2300
2400
2500
2600
2700
2800
2900
3000
3100
3200
3300
3400
3500
3600
3700
3800
3900
4000
4100
4200
4300
4400
4500
4600
4700
4800
4900
5000
5100
5200
5300
5400
5500
5600
5700
5800
5900
6000
6100
6200
6300
6400
6500
6600
6700
6800
6900
7000
7100
7200
7300
7400
7500
7600
50
7700
7800
7900
8000
8100
8200
8300
8400
8500
8600
8700
8800
8900
9000
9100
9200
9300
9400
9500
9600
9700
9800
9900
10000
10100
10200
10300
10400
10500
10600
10700
10800
10900
11000
11100
11200
11300
11400
11500
11600
11700
11800
11900
12000
12100
12200
12300
12400
12500
12600
12700
12800
12900
13000
13100
13200
13300
13400
13500
13600
13700
13800
13900
14000
14100
14200
14300
14400
14500
14600
14700
14800
14900
15000
15100
15200
15300
15400
15499
15500
51
52
53
54
55
56
15600
15700
15800
15900
16000
16100
16200
16300
16400
16500
16600
16700
16800
16900
17000
17100
17200
17300
17400
17500
17600
17700
17800
17900
18000
18100
18200
18300
18400
18500
18600
18700
18800
18900
19000
19100
19200
19300
19400
19500
19600
19700
19800
19900
20000
20100
20200
20300
20400
20500
20600
20700
20800
20900
21000
21100
21200
21300
21400
21500
57
21600
21700
21800
71
100
200
72
300
400
500
600
700
901
902
1000
TABLE UOCI
Racine, Wisconsin
1980 Census Tracts Comprising
LEAP Communities
73
1300
Project LEAP CIS Appendix
54
-------
TABLE LXXII
24
200
400
25
700
800
900
1000
1100
1200
1300
1400
1500
75
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
76
1000
1100
76
1500
1600
1700
1800
1900
77
2500
Kenosha, Wisconsin
1980 Census Tracts Comprising
LEAP Communities
26
1600
1700
1800
1900
2000
2100
2200
2300
TABLE LXXIII
Madison, Wisconsin
1980 Census Tracts Comprising
LEAP Communities
10
11
12
100
201
202
300
401
402
403
501
600
700
800
900
1000
1100
1200
1300
1401
1501
1502
1601
1602
1700
1900
2000
2100
2200
2301
2302
2401
2402
2500
2601
2700
2800
2900
3000
3100
3200
10200
TABLE UQCIV
Janesville, Wisconsin
1980 Census Tracts Comprising
LEAP Communities
TABLE LXXV
Beloit, Wisconsin
1980 Census Tracts Comprising
LEAP Communities
Project LEAP CIS Appendix
55
-------
TABLE LXXVI
Lacrosse, Wisconsin
1980 Census Tracts comprising
LEAP Communities
27
100
200
300
400
28
500
600
700
800
900
1000
1100
1200
TABLE LXXVXI
Sheboygan, Wisconsin
1980 Census Tracts Comprising
LEAP Communities
80
200
300
400
500
600
700
BOO
900
81
1000
1100
10700
TABLE LXXVXI
Appletown, Wisconsin
1980 Census Tracts Comprising
LEAP Comnranlti**
5
20301
65
10100
10200
10300
66
10400
10500
10600
10700
10800
10900
11000
11100
11200
11300
67
11400
11501
11502
93
2500
Project LEAP CIS Appendix
-------
LXXVIIZ
1980 Census Tracts Comprising
City of Chicago Communities
12345678
Rogers Park Uptown North Center Lincoln Park
West Ridge Lincoln Square Lake View Near North Side
101 201 310 401 501 601 701 801
102 202 311 402 502 602 702 802
103 203 312 403 503 603 703 803
104 204 313 404 504 604 704 804
105 205 314 405 505 605 705 805
106 206 315 406 506 606 706 806
107 207 316 407 507 607 707 807
108 208 317 408 508 608 708 808
109 209 318 409 509 609 709 809
319 410 510 610 710 810
320 511 611 711 811
321 512 612 712 812
513 613 713 813
514 614 714 814
515 615 715 815
616 716 816
617 717 817
618 718 818
619 719 819
620 720
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Edison Park Jefferson Park North Park Portage Park
Norwood Park Forest Glen Albany Park Irving Park
901 1001 1101 1201 1301 1401 1501 1601
902 1002 1102 1202 1302 1402 1502 1602
903 1003 1103 1203 1303 1403 1503 1603
1004 1104 1204 1304 1404 1504 1604
1005 1105 1305 1405 1505 1605
1006 1406 1506 1606
1007 1407 1507 1607
1408 1508 1608
1509 1609
1510 1610
1511 1611
1512 1612
1613
Project LEAP CIS Appendix 57
-------
1980 Census Tracts Comprising
City of Chicago Communities
17 IB 19
Dunning Bnlmont Cragin
1701
1702
1703
1704
1705
1706
1707
1708
1709
1710
1711
Hontclare
1801
1802
1803
21 22 23 24
Avondale Humbolt Park
Harmoaa
Logan Squara
West Town
1901
1902
1903
1904
1905
1906
1907
1908
1909
1910
1911
1912
1913
1914
2001
2002 •
2003
2004
2005
2006
2101
2102
2103
2104
2105
2106
2107
2108
2109
2201
2202
2203
2204
2205
2206
2207
2208
2209
2210
2211
2212
2213
2214
2215
2216
2217
2218
2219
2220
2221
2222
2223
2224
2225
2226
2227
2228
2229
2301
2302
2303
2304
2305
2306
2307
2308
2309
2310
2311
2312
2313
2314
2315
2316
2317
2318
2401
2402
2403
2404
2405
2406
2407
2408
2409
2410
2411
2412
2413
2414
2415
2416
2417
2418
2419
2420
2421
2422
2423
2424
2425
2426
2427
2428
2429
2430
2431
2432
2433
2434
2435
2436
Project LEAP CIS Appendix
58
-------
1980 Census Tracts Comprising
City of Chicago Communities
25
Austin
26
27
East Oarfield
West Oar£ield
28 29
North Lawndale
30 31 32
Lower West Side
Near West Side
South Lawndale
Loop
2501
2502
2503
2504
2505
2506
2507
2508
2509
2510
2511
2512
2513
2514
2515
2516
2517
2518
2519
2520
2521
2522
2523
2524
2601
2602
2603
2604
2605
2606
2607
2608
2609
2610
2701
2702
2703
2704
2705
2706
2707
2708
2709
2710
2711
2712
2713
2714
2715
2716
2717
2718
2719
2801
2802
2803
2804
2805
2806
2807
2808
2809
2810
2811
2812
2813
2814
2815
2816
2817
2818
2819
2820
2821
2822
2823
2824
2825
2826
2827
2828
2829
2830
2831
2832
2833
2834
2835
2836
2837
2838
2839
2840
2841
2842
2843
2901
2902
2903
2904
2905
2906
2907
2908
2909
2910
2911
2912
2913
2914
2915
2916
2917
2918
2919
2920
2921
2922
2923
2924
2925
2926
2927
3001
3002
3003
3004
3005
3006
3007
3008
3009
3010
3011
3012
3013
3014
3015
3016
3017
3018
3019
3020
3101
3102
3103
3104
3105
3106
3107
3108
3109
3110
3111
3112
3113
3114
3115
3201
3201
3202
3203
3204
3205
3206
Project LEAP CIS Appendix
59
-------
1980 Census Tracts Comprising
City of Chicago Communities
33
Near South Side
34
Armour Square
3301 3401
3302 3402
3303 3403
3304 3404
3305 3405
3406
35
Douglas
3501
3502
3503
3504
3505
3506
3507
3508
3509
3510
3511
3512
3513
3514
3515
36
Oakland
3601
3602
3603
3604
3605
37 38 39 40
Puller Park Kenwood
Grand Boulevard Washington Park
3701
3702
3703
3704
41
42
Hyde Park
4101
4102
4103
4104
4105
4106
4107
4108
4109
4110
4111
4112
4113
4114
Woodlawn
4201
4202
4203
4204
4205
4206
4207
4208
4209
4210
4211
4212
43
South Shore
r
4301
4302
4303
4304
4305
4306
4307
4308
4309
4310
4311
4312
4313
4314
44
ViAf ViMin
4401
4402
4403
4404
4405
4406
4407
4408
4409
3801
3802
3803
3804
3805
3806
3807
3808
3809
3810
3811
3812
3813
3814
3815
3816
3817
3818
3819
3820
46
3901
3902
3903
3904
3905
3906
3907
4001
4002
4003
4004
4005
4006
4007
4008
4B
45 46 47
Avalon Park Burnside
South Chicago Calumet Heights
4501
4502
4503
49
Roseland
4901
4902
4903
4904
4905
4906
4907
4908
4909
4910
4911
4912
4913
4914
50 51
South Deerlng
53
Nest Pullman
4601
4602
4603
4604
4605
4606
4607
4608
4609
4610
54
4701
4801
4802
4803
4804
4805
Pullman
5001
5002
5003
5101
5102
5103
5104
5104
5105
Base Side
5201
5202
5202
5203
5204
5205
5206
5301
5302
5303
5304
5305
5306
Riverdale
5401
55 56
Hedwisch
Oarfield Ridge
5501
5502
5601
5602
5603
5604
5605
5606
5607
5608
5609
5610
5611
5612
5613
Project LEAP CIS Appendix
60
-------
1980 Census Tracts Comprising
City of Chicago Communities
57
Archer Heights
58 59
Mckinley Park
60
Brighton Park
Bridgeport
61
New City
62
West Elsdon
63
Oage Park
64
Clearing
5701
5702
5703
5704
5705
5801
5802
5803
5804
5805
5806
5807
5808
5809
5810
5811
5901
5902
5903
5904
5905
5906
5907
6001
6002
6003
6004
6005
6006
6007
6008
6009
6010
6011
6012
6013
6014
6015
6016
6101
6102
6103
6104
6105
6106
6107
6108
6109
6110
6111
6112
6113
6114
6115
6116
6117
6118
6119
6120
6121
6122
6201
6202
6203
6204
6301
6302
6303
6304
6305
6306
6307
6308
6309
6401
6402
6403
6404
6405
6406
6407
6408
65 66 67 68 69 70
West Lawn Nest Bnglewood Greater Grand Crossing
Chicago Lawn Englewood Ashburn
71 72
Auburn Oresham
Beverly
6501
6502
6503
6504
6505
6601
6602
6603
6604
6605
6606
6607
6608
6609
6610
6611
6701
6702
6703
6704
6705
6706
6707
6708
6709
6710
6711
6712
6713
6714
6715
6716
6717
6718
6719
6720
6801
6802
6803
6804
6805
6806
6807
6808
6809
6810
6811
6812
6813
6814
6901
6902
6903
6904
6905
6906
6907
6908
6909
6910
6911
6912
6913
6914
6915
7001
7002
7003
7004
7005
7101
7102
7103
7104
7105
7106
7107
7108
7109
7110
7111
7112
7113
7114
7115
7201
7202
7203
7204
7205
7206
7207
Project LEAF GIS Appendix
61
-------
1980 Census Tracts Comprising
City of Chicago Communities
73 74 75 76 77
Washington Heights Morgan Park Edgewater
Mount Greenwood O'bare
7301 7401 7501 7608 301
7302 7402 7502 302
7303 7403 7503 303
7304 7404 7504 304
7305 7505 305
7306 7506 306
7307 307
308
309
Project LEAP CIS Appendix 62
------- |