WATER POLLUTION CONTROL RESEARCH SERIES • 18050 EDP 12/71
The  Use of  Fish Movement Patterns
          to Monitor Zinc
    U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

-------
          WATER POLLUTION CONTROL RESEARCH SERIES
The Water Pollution Control Research Series describes the
results and progress in the control and abatement of pollution
in our Nation's waters.  They provide a central source of
information on the research, development and demonstration
activities in the Environmental Protection Agency, through
inhouse research and grants and contracts with Federal, State,
and local agencies, research institutions, and industrial
organizations.

Inquiries pertaining to Water Pollution Control Research
Reports should be directed to the Chief, Publications Branch
(Water), Research Information Division, R&M, Environmental
Protection Agency, Washington, B.C. 20^60.

-------
                THE USE OF  FISH MOVEMENT  PATTERNS

                         TO MONITOR ZINC
                        John  Cairns, Jr.
                                and
                        William T. Waller
      Virgina  Polytechnic  Institute and State University
    Biology  Department and Center for  Environmental Studies
                   Blacksburg, Virginia 24061
                              for the

                 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  AGENCY
                       Project #18050 EDP
                          December 1971
For salo by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 20402 - Price 65 cents

-------
               EPA Review Notice
This report has been reviewed by the Environ-
mental Protection Agency, and approved for
publication.  Approval does not signify that
the contents necessarily reflect the view and
policies of the Environmental Protection
Agency, nor does mention of trade names or
commercial products constitute endorsement or
recommendation for use.
                       ii

-------
                                 ABSTRACT
The feasibility of using fish movement patterns measured by light beam
interruption as a technique for continuous monitoring of the response
of fish to zinc was investigated.  In conjunction with the monitoring
studies the growth and reproductive success of the B luegill sunfish
(Lepomis macrochirus) exposed to various fractions of the lowest
concentration of zinc detected by the monitoring apparatus were studied.

The monitoring apparatus does not in any way interfere with fish move-
ment within the test chamber and allows for the maintenance of fish for
long time periods.  Under the conditions described the system detects
premortal aberrations in fish movement caused by zinc.  The detection of
stress occurs in sufficient time to permit survival of the test fish if
stress conditions are reversed at the time of detection.  The lowest
concentration of zinc detected by the system  during a 96-hour exposure
was between 3.64 and 2,94 mg/1 Zn"*""1".  The system's range of effective
measurement as related to turbidity is discussed.  This method should
detect other toxicity equally well.

The growth and reproductive success of the bluegill was tested in
concentrations approximately equal to 1/10 and 1/100 the lowest
concentration of zinc detected by the monitoring system and 1/100 of
the 96 hour TL50 (median tolerance limit) determined under continuous
flow conditions.  The growth and reproductive success in 1/100 the
lowest detected zinc concentration and 1/100 the 96 hour TL50 value
did not differ appreciably from the controls while a concentration of
approximately 1/10 the lowest detected zinc concentration in effect
eliminated reproduction in the bluegill.
                                   iii

-------
                                 CONTENTS






Section




  I        Conclusions




  II       Recommendations




  III      Introduction




  IV       Effects of Zinc on Fish Movement




  V        Growth and Reproductive Studies




  VI       Acknowledgments




  VII      Literature Cited




  VIII     Publications
Page




  1




  3




  5




  7




 39




 51




 53




 55
                                     V

-------
                                  FIGURE




                                                                   Page




1     Block diagram of monitoring apparatus                        9
                                   VI

-------
                                  TABLES
No.                                                                Page


1      Summary of general fish data:  mean and standard deviation   11
         of wet weight, standard length, and total length.

2      Chemical characteristics of dilution water.                  13

3      Summary of statistical analyses of static experiments 1-4.    17

4      Summary of statistical analyses of static experiments 5-8.    19

5      Summary of statistical analyses of static experiments 9-10.   20

6      Summary of statistical analysis of continuous flow           22
         experiment 11.

7      Summary of statistical analysis of continuous flow           23
         experiment 12.

8      Summary of statistical analysis of continuous flow           24
         experiment 13.

9      Summary of statistical analysis of continuous flow           25
         experiment 14.

10     Summary of statistical analysis of continuous flow           26
         experiment 15.

11     Summary of statistical analysis of continuous flow           27
         experiment 16.

12     Summary of statistical analysis of continuous flow           28
         experiment 17.

13     Summary of statistical analysis of continuous flow           29
         experiment 18.

14-A   Summary of statistical analysis of continuous flow           31
         experiment 19;  days 1-8.

14-B   Summary of statistical analysis of continuous flow           32
         experiment 19;  days 8-10.

15-A   Summary of statistical analysis of continuous flow           34
         experiment 20;  days 1-8.
                                   VII

-------
No.                                                                Page

15-B    Summary  of statistical analysis of continuous flow           35
          experiment 20;  days 8-14.

15-C    Summary  of statistical analysis of continuous flow           36
          experiment 20;  days 14-20.

16      Zinc and dissolved oxygen concentrations, temperatures       43
          in breeding tanks.

17      Survival of adult bluegills and weights, lengths and         44
          condition of gonads of adults at end of breeding
          experiment.

18     Spawning of adult bluegills and percentage hatch of          47
         eggs at four zinc concentrations.

19     Survival and growth of bluegills in four zinc                48
         concentrations.
                                  VIII

-------
                               SECTION I

                              CONCLUSIONS

1.  The monitoring system used in this study detects aberrations in
movement patterns of fish exposed to lethal and sublethal concentrations
of zinc.

2.  The monitoring system does not detect aberrations in movement
patterns of bluegills exposed to concentrations of zinc which effectively
eliminate reproduction.

3.  The system does not require direct contact with the fish being
monitored and therefore allows for the maintenance of the fish for
extended periods of time.

4.  The monitoring system as described is limited in its applicability
to continuously monitor effluents unless turbidity is controlled.

5.  The reproduction of bluegill sunfish under the conditions described
is effectively eliminated at a concentration of approximately .255 mg/1
Zn44".

-------
                               SECTION II

                            RECOMMENDATIONS

This laboratory study was designed to develop the equipment and
precedures necessary to test the hypothesis that fish movement patterns
could be used as a means of detecting premortal aberrations.  This goal
was achieved, and it is recommended that further laboratory studies
using different toxicants and or combinations of stressors be carried
out to refine the techniques developed.

The relationship between the removal of suspended solids and toxicity
should be studied to determine if extending the effective range of
measurement of the instrument by removing the solids in turn alters
the predictability of the system.

In depth statistical evaluations should be undertaken to determine if
the sensitivity and speed of response through analysis can be facilita-
ted.

It is recommended that when growth and reproductive studies are
undertaken utilizing fish of the size range used in these experiments
that larger containers be employed to house the spawning fish.  The
container should probably be at least twice the length of the tanks
employed in these studies.

In growth and reproductive studies several duplicates of each
concentration should be simultaneously analyzed to insure that the
apparent inherent biological differences in behavior and reproductive
potential are not interpreted as absolute differences due to the
toxicant being studied.

In these studies, contrary to that reported elsewhere, spawning was
not generally confined to a certain time interval within the photo-
period.  Therefore checking the nests twice a day once in the morning,
and once in the evening is recommended as a means of eliminating the
loss of some spawnings due to hatching occurring prior to the time of
nest checking.

-------
                               SECTION III

                               INTRODUCTION
As the pollution problems associated with an expanding industrial base
and increasing population size become more acute, the need for an over-
all program of ecosystem management to minimize the adverse effects of
man's activities on the environment must be developed.

The report of the Council on Environmental Quality (1970) repeatedly
stresses the need for the development of predictive, simulative and
management capabilities to combat air and water pollution.  These tech-
niques must be developed if the concept of multiple use set forth in the
Water Quality Act of 1967 (Public Law 89-234) is to succeed and if the
present practice of alteration without comprehension is to be eliminated.

A great deal of progress has been made in determining biologically safe
concentrations for fish (Mount and Stephan, 1967; Mount, 1968; Water
Quality Criteria, 1968; Sprague, 1969; Brungs, 1969; and Eaton, 1970).
There remains, however, at least one critical area of effluent quality
control which must be effectively monitored before the standards for
chronic exposure of fish to toxicants will prove effective.  This
protection should include safeguards against the development of acutely
toxic conditions resulting from either industrial or municipal accidents
or from changes in the total environmental variation and industrial
processes.

If an industry conforms to the predetermined standards for chronic
exposure 363 days out of the year and over a period of two days due to
human error or a combination of human error and changes in the physical
and chemical characteristics of the receiving stream acutely toxic
conditions develop which are not detected in time to prevent deleterious
conditions from developing—then the standards for chronic exposure
alone can not protect the receiving stream.  Also an industrial or
municipal effluent could foreseeably conform to the standards for chronic
exposure all the time and still not insure against the development of
acutely toxic conditions.  For example, if an upstream industry changed
processes resulting in the release of a compound, at a predetermined
biologically safe concentration, which interacted synergistically with
an effluent from a downstream industry, also released at a predetermined
biologically safe concentration for fish, the result could be not only
chronic stresses but the development of acutely toxic conditions.  The
standards for chronic exposure without sufficient protection against
the development of acutely toxic conditions will not maintain a vigor-
ously functioning aquatic ecosystem.

Continuous physical and chemical monitoring systems provide a partial
answer to this problem in that they may be used to detect almost
instantaneously a single environmental variable which has reached a

-------
lethal level.  However, aquatic organisms respond to the collective
effect of the environmental factors and these effects can not be
predicted from the chemical-physical analyses alone without direct
feedback from the organisms.

Cairns (1970) and Cairns (in press) presents a plan for a systems
approach to aquatic ecosystem management on a regional basis.  In order
to implement this plan both instream and inplant systems for continuous
biological monitoring must be developed (Shirer, et al^., 1968; Cairns,
e^al., 1970).

The objective of this study was to determine the feasibility of using
fish movement patterns monitored by light beam interruption as a
technique to detect premortal aberrations.

-------
                                SECTION IV

                    EFFECTS OF ZINC ON FISH MOVEMENTS
Three species of fish were tested under varied environmental conditions
in a total of twenty experiments to determine the feasibility of using
fish movement patterns as a means of detecting acute and chronic expo-
sure to pollutants.

Monitoring Apparatus;  The design philosophy of the monitoring apparatus
was based on technical simplicity and reliability.  Common five-gallon
tropical fish aquaria of about 41 cm length, 21.5 cm width, and 26 cm
height were used as the test tanks.  Basically the monitoring units
consisted of light beams which were arranged to traverse the length of
the tanks near the bottom, middle, and just below the surface (Figure 1).
Photoresistors at the opposite end of the tanks were illuminated solely
by the lamp sources with the aid of collimating baffles.  Interruption
of the light falling on the photoresistors operated relays, via two-
transistor amplifiers, which in turn advanced counters and deflected
pens of an event recorder.  Six tanks, each with three light beam sen-
sors, were used in each experiment.  For a detailed description of the
circuitry see Shirer, Carins, and Waller (1968).

Static Tests;  Ten of the twenty experiments analyzed were carried out
under static test conditions.  In these experiments the test tanks were
housed in a light-tight plywood chamber 2 x 1 x 2.5 meters.  Ambient
illumination within the chamber was provided by a pair of 40 Watt
fluorescent tubes cycled daily for 12 hours darkness and 12 hours light
with a time switch.

Each tank, filled to a calibrated 17 liter mark, was equipped with an
air diffusion stone housed in a perforated plastic cylinder.  The
plastic cylinder was located midway along the length of each tank and
contained the rising air bubbles.  The cylinder served to eliminate any
erroneous signals which might have resulted from bubbles breaking the
light beam.

Synthetic dilution water was used for all static tests  (Scheier and
Cairns, 1966).  The chemical characteristics of the synthetic dilution
water are based on determinations made at the beginning and end of each
experiment.  Dissolved oxygen was   7.5 mg/1 for all determinations.
The pH was always highest at the beginning of each test ranging from
7.0 - 7.8.  For any given tank pH did not decrease by more than 0.5
during any experiment.  Temperature always increased during an experi-
ment.  Temperature ranged from 20 C - 25 C.  Initial and final hardness
and methyl orange alkalinity values were constant for both factors and
were 51 mg/1 as CaC03 and 68 mg/1 as CaCO^ respectively.

Test Organisms;  Two species of fish, the golden shiner Notemigonus

-------
      Figure 1






  Block diagram of




monitoring apparatus

-------
                Fluorescent light
Lamps
Tank
Photoresistors
                                                           Time
                                                          switch
                                                               Counters      Event recorder
ers



II II II

i


II 1 1 II




II 1 1 II

•



-






T
t
f







-------
  crysoleucas  (Mitchell)  and  the  goldfish Carassius auratus (Linnaeus),
  were tested  under  static  conditions.  Because of the difficulty in main-
  taining  stocks of  golden  shiners under static test conditions only a
  single experiment  using this species was completed.  Test fish were
  acclimated to experimental  dilution water, temperature, and photoperiod
  for  a period of at least  two weeks prior to their use in an experiment.
  During this  period they were fed a commercial food preparation (Tetra-
  Min)  ad  libitum twice daily.  The test fish were not fed during an
  experiment.

  Two  days prior to  the beginning of an experiment a single test fish was
  placed in each of  the six test chambers and allowed to readjust after
  handling.  After the two-day readjustment period recording was started
  at 6:30 a.m. and continued for eight days.  At 6:30 a.m. on the fifth
  day the calculated concentration of toxicant was added in solution to
  each of the  experimental tanks;  the control received the same volume of
  dilution water minus the toxicant.  The gradual addition of the toxicant
 was accomplished by adding the solution via plastic tubing to each tank.
 Mixing was quite rapid due to the air driven circulation of tank water.

 At the beginning of the recording period the counts registered on the
 electric  counters for each of the three photocells  in a single tank were
 recorded  in  a notebook.   Subsequent records were made every three hours
 throughout the test period,  except for a daily interval from 12:30 a.m.
 to 6:30 a.m.  during the dark cycle of the photoperiod.   Cummulative move-
 ment  for  the desired interval was obtained by subtracting two successive
 readings. Upon completion of an experiment,  total  length and wet weight
 was recorded  for  each fish (Table I).   All tanks and  equipment were washed
 in EDTA between experiments.

 Continuous Flow Experiments;  Initial analyses of the movement patterns
 recorded  in  the static  tests revealed a high  level  of variance.   Because
 of the high level of  variance and because  continuous  flow testing  more
 realistically approximated the conditions  under  which this apparatus
 would be  used, a second  series of ten experiments using  the  bluegill
 Lepomis macrochirus (Rafinesque)  as the  test  species  were performed.  All
 procedural changes  incorporated  in the continuous flow  tests were  done
 in an attempt to increase  reliability  and  reduce variance.

 Monitoring Apparatus;  The only  change made in the monitoring  apparatus
 was the addition of red  650  mu filters to  each of the light  paths.
 Although one  can not  say that visual detection of the beams  would  be
 impossible at this  level,  the lighting conditions would provide reason-
 able  "darkness" i.e., at a level which would not  exceed moonlight  nights
 (J. R. Brett, personal communication).

All movement  experiments were carried  out  in an  isolation room.  The
 isolation room was  designed  to reduce  the effects of noise produced  by
normal laboratory traffic.  The experimental and stock tanks housed  in
 the isolation room were  placed on a 35cm deep sand bed.
                                    10

-------
TABLE 1.  SUMMARY OF GENERAL FISH DATA
Expt. Weight
Number (grams)
Mean St. Dev.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
3.4
5.4
5.0
3.2
4.5
4.6
5.3
4.1
3.5
3.9
14.2
15.5
19.6
12.3
13.0
12.3
11.5
12.4
14.3
13.9
0.258
0.854
1.162
0.337
1.001
0.656
0.579
0.544
0.571
0.520
3.023
1.778
2.377
2,053
3.172
2.851
2.317
2.180
1.989
2.234
Standard Length
(cm)
Mean St. Dev.
	
~~
	
- —
	
, — ~
5.5
4.9
4.8
4.9
7.7
8.0
8.7
7.4
7.4
7.6
7.4
7.5
7.9
8.1
, —
—• ™—
w
-,—
— ..
	
0.213
0.233
0.242
0.147
0.432
0.273
0.297
0.322
0.561
0.450
0.404
0.460
0.281
0.368
Total Length
(cm)
Mean St. Dev.
7.9
7.9
8.2
7.2
7.7
7.9
8.2
8.2
7.3
7.6
10.2
10.6
11.3
9.7
9.5
9.9
9.7
9.6
10.2
10.3
0.568
0.531
0.564
0.334
0.606
0.206
0.459
0.729
0.278
0.524
0.567
0.350
0.312
0.436
0.739
0.588
0.470
0.563
0.337
0.444
                  11

-------
 Two pieces of lucite, painted black, were cemented to the side and bottom
 of each 17-liter stock and experimental tank to form the top and outside
 wall of a 14 cm long by 6 cm open chamber.  It was hoped that the chamber
 would provide a refuge for the fish when stressed, thereby magnifying the
 changes in normal movement patterns.

 Both isolation rooms and the stock and growth and reproduction room were
 maintained on the same simulated dawn-dusk photoperiod.  A motor driven
 dimming unit was used to increase light intensity at "sunrise" from zero
 intensity to a maximum intensity of 100 foot candles, measured at the
 water's surface of the experimental tanks.  The increase in light inten-
 sity from zero to full intensity occurred over a thirty-minute period.
 The reverse sequence occurred during the simulated sunset,  Forty-Watt
 vita-lite fluorescent tubes provided the ambient illumination.

 Dechlorinated municipal tap water flowed by gravity from a 500 gallon
 reservoir to two smaller 189-liter reservoir.   The smaller constant head
 reservoir served as the immediate source of water for the movement exper-
 iments,  and final temperature adjustments were accomplished at this point.
 Routine chemical analyses were performed daily on the water in the 189
 liter  reservoir  (Table 2).   Two modified Harvard 1210 variable speed
 peristaltic pumps were used to provide flow to the experimental tanks.
 Three  tanks were serviced by each pump.   A single hose for each tank was
 anchored in the  189-liter reservoir five cm beneath the water surface.
 The water was pumped up through a glass  stopcock and flowmeter after
 which  the line split and passed through  the head of the peristaltic pump.
 After  passing through the pump the line  was rejoined and continued to a
 small  mixing  vessel before continuing  to the appropriate experimental
 tank.  The  continuous flow line to each  tank entered its respective tank
 in one corner, the  flow being released approximately one centimeter from
 the bottom  of the tank.  A 0.64 cm effluent port was drilled through the
 glass wall  of each  tank at  the opposite  end and side of influent  water.
 The effluent  port was drilled at the 17-liter  mark in each tank.   The
 effluent water for  each tank  was returned to the outside of the isolation
 room for sample  collection  and if not  used for that purpose was dis-
 charged .

 Flow rates were  determined  twice daily by collecting the effluent from
 each tank five times  for one-minute intervals.   The mean flow rate for
 this period was  calculated  and  the flow  to each tank adjusted accordingly.
An attempt was made  to maintain all flow rates  at  100 mls/min.

Toxicant introduction was accomplished by  switching from the 189-liter
constant head reservoir to  two  95-liter  constant head containers  in
which a calculated concentration of reagent grade  ZnSO^^I^O had  been
mixed.   Care was taken to avoid  temperature differences  between the
regular dilution water and  the batch mixed zinc  solutions.   The zinc
analyses x*ere determined using  atomic  absorption spectrophotometry made
at least twice daily.  The initial measurement was  made  after nine hours
to insure that 95 - 99% particle  replacement had occurred within  the
test chambers.  At the conclusion of each  experiment  the tanks  and  glass-
                                    12

-------
          TABLE 2.  CHEMICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF DILUTION WATER.
Water Characteristics
Continuous Flow
Experiments
Temperature ( C)
PH
Total Hardness (mg/1 as CaCO )
M.O. Alkalinity (mg/1 as CaCO.,)
Number
of
Analyses
396
397
394
393
Mean
19.7
7.8
51
41.3
S.D.
1.79
0.26
10
8.8
Dissolved Oxygen                       7.5 in all cases

Chlorine                             not detectable unless otherwise
                                     noted
                                    13

-------
  ware were washed with  EDTA and all  tubing was replaced.

  Water  from  the 189 liter reservoir  also flowed into the stock and growth
  and  reproduction room  where it was  pumped to the elevated constant head
  reservoir.  Temperature adjustments were made at this point before the
  water  flowed by gravity to the five 189-liter stock tanks.  Water also
  flowed from the elevated constnat head box back into the isolation room
  where  it was distributed to the six 17-liter stock tanks.

  Fish;  The  bluegill stock used in these experiments were obtained by
  seining a pond located on the property of the Veterans Administration
  Hospital in Salem, Virginia.  In the laboratory the fish were maintained
  under  continuous flow conditions for a period of at least two weeks
  before being moved to isolation room two.   During acclimation fish were
  fed Gordon's formula (Axelrod, 1952) once daily between the hours of
  8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m.  The exact hour of feeding was determined from
 a random number table.  This was done in an attempt to eliminate the
 effect of anticipated feeding which may have developed had the fish been
 fed at the same time each day (Davis and Bardach,  1964).   Experiments 19
 and 20 represent the only tests in which fish were fed.  The methods for
 bioassay fish (A.P.H.A.,  1965) were adhered to as closely as possible.

 Six test fish were moved  from the community stock tanks and placed one
 fish per tank in the 17-liter stock tanks  located in isolation room two.
 The fish were acclimated  to  conditions in  these tanks for a period of at
 least two weeks  before being used in an experiment.  Four days prior to
 the beginning of an experiment the six fish located in the 17-liter
 stock tanks  were transferred to the experimental tanks.   After a four-day
 readjustment period recording  was started  and continued for a period of
 eight days.   At  the beginning  of  the fifth day of  recording the flow was
 switched  from the  189-liter  constant head  reservoir to the constant head
 batch mixed  zinc reservoirs.

 Data  recording was  facilitated by the use  of a 35 mm Ricoh Auto Shot
 spring  advance camera.  The  camera was tripped by a solenoid activated
 by  a  time switch.   Pictures  of the electric  counters (Figure 1)  were
 taken at hourly intervals throughout each  24-hour period  except for the
 hours divided by the simulated sunrise and sunset.   During this period
 pictures were taken on  the half hour.   At  the end of an experiment  the
 fish were killed and wet weight,  standard  length, and total length
 measurements were taken (Table 1).

 Statistical  Analyses;   The statistical test  used to analyze the fish
 movement patterns was a two-sample test for  homogeneity of variance.  A
 computer program written by Sokal  and  Rohlf  (1969)  was used to  facilitate
 handling the large volume of data.   In all analyses each  fish served  as
 its own control.  For the experiments  carried out under the static  test
 conditions day to day comparisons were made  by using  the  six time inter-
vals for which records were made to  obtain an estimate of  the variance
 in movement  patterns for a given day.  The variance for the  data recorded
during day 1 was then compared to  the variance recorded for  day  2,  the
                                    14

-------
the largest variance value being divided by the smaller value.   If the
test for homogeneity of variance was not significant the fish was not
considered to be showing abnormal movement patterns and the variance
estimate for day 2 was then tested for homogeneity against the  variance
for day 3.  If at any time the test for significance indicated  hetero-
geneity the data for the last recorded day was dropped and the  preceding
day was compared to the variance estimate for the next day.  For example,
if the test for homogeneous variance between day 2 and day 3 indicated
the variances were heterogeneous, the variance estimate for day 3 was
dropped from the analysis and day 2 was compared to day 4.  An  analysis
showing heterogeneity was considered to indicate abnormal changes in the
movement patterns.

The data from the continuous flow tests were treated in the same manner
except the time interval for data collection  was reduced from  the day
to day comparisons in the static stest to comparisons made four times
during a 24-hour period.  The level of significance used for all tests
was   = .002.

Results and Discussion;  xhe results presented here represent a progres-
sion from relatively crude static tests to more sophisticated continuous
flow tests.  The results do not include fifteen tests which actually
formed the basis for the methods employed in the tests reported.  The
preliminary studies included experiments in which more than one fish per
test chamber was used, more than three photocells per test chamber were
used, and various periods of acclimation were investigated as well as
different photoperiod regimes.

The criterion used to determine abnormal movement patterns was a positive
test for heterogeneity.  The definition of "stress detection" is arbi-
trary and is based on the results obtained, rather than some pre-con-
ceived idea as to what might constitute "stress" in terms of fish move-
ment patterns as monitored by light beam interruption.  For example, the
results presented in Tables 3-15 represent a series of experiments in
which the total movement of the fish  (the sum of the light beam inter-
ruptions for the three photocells in a given tank) was used to obtain an
estimate of the variance used in the statistical test for heterogeneity.
Based on the results obtained from these experiments the  definition of
"stress detection" is the occurrence of two or more positive tests for
heterogeneity (abnormal movement) during the same  time  interval.

Since light beam interruptions are recorded for  three different photo-
cell levels within each tank there exists seven  possible  combinations of
photocell levels on which the variance estimates used to  determine
abnormal movement can be based.  The results presented  here are based
entirely on the sum of  the light beam interruptions  for all three photo-
cells in a given tank.  The advantages or disadvantages obtained  from
analyzing the light beam interruptions from the  three levels in all
possible combinations has not as yet been established but because there
is an observable tendency for bluegills under stress to increase  activity
at the tops of the test chambers, the continuous flow data have been
                                   15

-------
  analyzed using light  beam interruptions  recorded  for the top photocells
  in each tank.  The analyses in which  the  light beam interruptions re-
  corded  for the top photocells alone  were used agree in general with
  those obtained using  the total  light beam  interruptions from all three
  photocells with one major distinction. The definition for stress detec-
  tion  given for analyses  based on  the total light  beam interruptions from
  all three photocells  does not give consistent or  reliable results when
  the light beam interruptions for  the top photocells in each tank are
  analyzed alone.  It may be that  analyses based on  the- light beam interr-
  uptions  from the six  possible combinations of photocell levels will each
  have  a different set  of  criteria  on  which  stress  detection is based. The
  fact  that the  arbitrarily defined stress detection is dependent on which
  combination of photocells are being  analyzed is not important. What is
  important is that  once the criteria  have been established for stress
  detection using  a  certain combination of photocell levels, the results
  based on  this  combination must give  a consistent  and reliable index of
  premortal  aberrations.

 It should be noted  that the system does not directly monitor the total
 activity of the fish but  rather reflects changes  in the variances of
 movement through the light beams as compared to the variance in light
 beam interruptions recorded for a previous time interval.  The magnitude
 of change in the number of light beam interruptions does not necessarily
 mean that a positive test for heterogeneity will be recorded. What is
 necessary is an increase or decrease in the variance of one of the time
 intervals compared.

 Tables 3, 4, and 5 give the results obtained from static experiments 1
 through  10. These results show that during the first four days of any
 experiment the  variance calculated from the number of  light beam inter-
 ruptions  recorded for  the test fish only periodically  deviated from the
 preceding day giving rise to a positive test  for abnormal movement.  A
 positive  test for abnormal movement is  indicated by an asterisk in the
 tables. The most  important aspect  of  these  analyses is that  during the
 first  four days of these  experiments, in only one special case was there
 ever more than  a single positive test for abnormal movement  recorded dur-
 ing a  given time  interval. For example,  in  Table 3, experiment 1,  the
 comparison of variances in light beam interruption for  day 1  vs day  2,
 fish number six,  indicates a positive test  for abnormal movement as  shown
 by  the asterisk.  During this  same  time  interval  (day 1 vs day 2)  this was
 the  only  analysis in which a positive test  for abnormal movement was
 detected.

 The results  from  the second four days of  experiments 1, 2, and  3 (Table
 3)  show that stress detection (the occurrence of two positive  tests  for
 abnormal movement  during  the same  time  interval) occurred during the
 first day  of exposure  to  7.5 mg/1  Zn*"*"  for  the golden shiner,  and  15.5
mg/1 Zn*"1"  and 7.5 mg/1 Zn4* for  goldfish. For goldfish  these were  acute-
 ly toxic levels as  indicated by  the deaths  recorded on  the following days.
 The fact that stress detection occurred before the onset of death  in both
 cases indicated that the use of  light beam  interruption as a technique
                                    16

-------
TABLE 3.  STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF LIGHT BEAM INTERRUPTIONS  RECORDED
          DURING STATIC EXPERIMENTS 1-4.
Day 1
vs
Day 2

Fish
1
2
3
4
5
6-C


1

2
3
4
5-C
6



1
2
3
4
5-C
6



0
Fish
0
0
0
*


0

0
0
0
0
0



0
0
0
0
0
0

Day 2 Day 3
vs vs
Day 3 Day 4
Experiment

0
No

0
died during day
0
0
0
0(lvs3)

Experiment
0

0
0
0
0
0

Experiment

0
0
0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0

No
0

0
0
0
0
0

No

0
0
0
0
0
0

Experiment No


1
2
3-C
4
5
6


0
0
0
0
0
Leak


0
0
0
0
0
in Tank


0
0
0
0
0
—
D.iy 4 Day 5 Day 6 Day 7
vs vs vs vs
Day 5 Day 6 Day 7 Day 8
. 1

i
i
i "S
TD
•o
<
t.
N
1
. 2
i
T)
0)
TD
t)
4*
+
1
1
. 3
i
i
•a

-------
  for monitoring movement  is  sufficiently sensitive to detect premortal
  signs  of stress.

  In experiments 4  through 10 (Tables 3, 4, and 5) no stress detection
  occurred when  goldfish were exposed to levels of zinc from 5.6 mg/1 to
  1.8 mg/1 except in  the special case recorded during experiment 6
  (Table 4). Experiment 6  represents a weakness in the technique of
  analysis, the  correction of which involves programming a subjective
  decision into  the computer  used for analysis. The statistical analysis
  of the light beam interruptions for fish five revealed a positive test
  for abnormal movement when  day 1 was compared to day 2. This positive
  test continued when day  1 was compared to day 3 and eventually lead to
  stress detection by the  system when day 1 was compared to day 4 for
  fish five and abnormal movement was also recorded for fish 1 during
  the same time interval.  This was a false stress detection which must
  occur only rarely if the system is to function properly. This type of
  response for fish five was perpetuated after the comparison of day 1
  and 2 by the rules governing the handling of data after a positive test
  for abnormal movement had been recorded.  This rule states that when two
 intervals are compared and a positive test for abnormal movement is
 recorded the data for the most recently recorded time interval is
 dropped and the next time interval is compared to the last interval in
 which normal movement was recorded.  Obviously in this case the variance
 calculated from the  data recorded for day 1 was not  in line with those
 recorded for the successive time intervals.  A programmable instruction
 to the  computer to eliminate this weakness would be  based on the follow-
 ing logic.  If a positive  test for heterogeneous variances is recorded
 for a single  fish  for x number of comparisons in a row,  during time
 periods when  no other analyses are indicating positive responses,  then
 re-evaluate  the analysis  in  which the  first  heterogeneous variance was
 recorded. The re-evaluation, in this  case, would mean  instead  of drop-
 ping the  estimate  of variance recorded for day 2 as was  done during
 the original  analysis, drop  the estimate  for variance  for day  1 and
 proceed with  the comparisons.  This was done  for these  data and the
 results showed  homogeneous variances  (normal movement  patterns)  for
 all subsequent  comparisons involving data  from fish number five. As
 noted in  this discussion, x  number of  comparisons was  used as  opposed
 to  some specific number.  Specifying a  number of  comparisons  at this
 point would be  premature  because  of the limited  number of instances in
 which the perpetuation of heterogeneity has  occurred.

 Experiment 8  (Table  4) was carried out  to determine the  effects  of
 maintaining the  test  organisms  for eight days under static test  condi-
 tions without feeding. In this  experiment the  fish were  handled  as  in
 the  zinc  addition experiments except that at  the beginning of  the  fifth
 day, instead of adding zinc  in solution, the equivalent  amount of dilution
water minus zinc was  added to each test chamber. As the  results show  there
 does not  appear  to be any tendency toward increased heterogeneity over
 the eight-day test period.

The results from the continuous flow tests are presented  in Tables  6
                                   18

-------
TABLE 4.   STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF LIGHT BEAM INTERRUPTIONS RECORDED
           DURING STATIC EXPERIMENTS 5-8.



Day 1
vs
Day 2
Day 2
vs
Day 3
Day 3
VK
Day 4
Experiment No. 5
Fish
1
2
3
4
5-C
6


0
0
0
0
0
0


0
0
0
0
0
0


0
0
0
0
0
0

Experiment No. 6

1
2-C
3
4
5
6


0
0
0
0

0


0
0
0
0
*(lvs3)
0


0
0
0
0
*(lvs4)
0

Experiment No. 7

1
2
3
4-C
5
6


0
0
0
0
0
0


*
0
0
0
0
0


0(2vs4)
0
0
0
0
0

Experiment No. 8

1
2
3
4
5
6

0
0
0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0
*
0

0
0
0
0
*(2vs4)
0



Day 4
vs
Day 5
Goldfish 3.
i
i
•a
0)
•a
"O
4!
c
CsJ
1
1

0
0
0
*
0
0

Goldfish 3.
i
i
a)
*o

*fl
I
I

*
0
0
0
*(lvs5)
0

Goldfish 1.
i
•a
0)
•a
-a
_i_
c
N
1
1

0
0
0
0
0
0

Day 5
vs
Day 6
2 mg/1 Zn

0
0
0
0(4vs6)
0
0

2 mg/1 Zn

0(4vs6)
0
0
0
*(lvs6)
0

8 mg/1 Zn

0
*
0
0
0
0

Goldfish All Tanks
i
i
Q)
•o

-------
TABLE 5.     STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF LIGHT  BEAM
            DURING STATIC KXI'liRIMiiNTS 9-30.
INTERRUPTIONS RECORDED



U;ty 1
vs
Day 2
Day 2
vs
Day 3
Day 3
vs
Day 4
Experiment No.
Fish
1
2-C
3
4
5
6

0
0
0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0
0
0

*
0
0
0
0
0
Experiment No.
1-C

2

3
4
5
6
0

0

0
0
0
0
0

0

0
0
0
0
0

0

0
0
0
0



9
i
i
•o
13
•o
t
c
1
10
-o

-------
 through  15. These data are reported as first half day values, second
 half  day values, first half night values, and second half night values.
 The segment referred to as first half day values was from 7:00 a.m. to
 1:00  p.m., but because data were recorded at half hour intervals during
 sunrise  this interval includes seven record units on which the variance
 estimate for this interval was based. Second half day values include the
 time  from 1: p.m. to 7:30 p.m. during which seven record units were made.
 The first half night values include the time from 7:30 p.m. to 1:00 a.m.
 and six  record units, while the second half night values include the time
 from  1:00 a.m. to 7:00 a.m. during which six record units were made.

 The results presented in Table 6 (Experiment 11) indicate stress detec-
 tion  occurred during a time period when no zinc was being added to the
 system,  and would initially appear to be a false detection. However, the
 reason for this detection was traced to a breakdown in the chlorine neu-
 tralizing system. This breakdown probably occurred sometime during the
 morning  or early after noon of day 4 and by early evening the chlorine
 content  in the effluent from the test chambers reached 0.10 mg/1. The
 chlorine neutralizing system was repaired and by 12:00 a.m. on day 4
 the effluents from the test chambers was <• 0.05 mg/1. Because the fish
 had received this short term stress prior to the normal time for zinc
 addition no additional stress was applied. The experiment was run to
 normal termination to determine the recovery patterns of the fish. Once
 the chlorine stress was removed the return to normal movement patterns
was quite rapid as can be seen from the lack of abnormal movement record-
 ed for the second half night comparisons between day 3 and day 4.

 The results presented in Tables 7 through 12 represent a series of exper-
 iments designed to determine the lowest concentration of zinc detected by
 the system under the conditions described. Each table includes a value
 for the  calculated concentration of introduced zinc and in parentheses
 a mean measured concentration (atomic absorption).

The results from this series of experiments indicate that the lowest
 detectable zinc concentration based on measured concentrations is bet-
ween  3.64 (Table 11) and 2.94 mg/1 Zn** for a 96-hour exposure (Table 12).

Some  of  the experiments in this series presented special problems and
 interpretation and need further qualification. Tables 9 and 13 show the
 results obtained from two experiments in which problems with the record-
 ing equipment were encountered. These experiments are not consecutively
numbered but were carried out consecutively. The problem was due to the
 loss  of bias control in the main recorder, resulting in erroneous counts
 in those cells for which no data are given. This equipment malfunction
was due to insufficient cooling in the main recorder, and the addition
of a  fan to cool electrical components eliminated the problem.

The results from experiment 15 (Table 10) indicate that stress detection
occurred during the first half night values when day 4 was compared to
day 5. Comparing this response time to stress detection with that for
                                   21

-------
TABLE  6.     STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF LIGHT BEAM INTERRUPTIONS RECORDED
             DURING CONTINUOUS FLOW EXPERIMENT 11.  iiLUEGILL ALL TANKS
             CONTROLS.




Fish
1
2
3
4
5
6

1
2
3
4
5
6
Day 1
vs
Day 2


0
0
0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0
0
0
Day 2
vs
Day 3


0
0
0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0
0
0
Day 3
vs
Day 4
First

0
0
0
0
0
0
Second
0
0
0
0
0
0
Day 4
vs
Day 5
Day 5
vs
Day 6
Day 6
vs
Day 7
Day 7
vs
Day 8
Half Day Values

0
0
0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0
0
0
Half Day Values
0
0
0
0
0
*
First Half Night
1
2
3
4
5
6

1
2
3
4
5
6
0
0
0
0
0
*

0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0(lvs3)

0
0
0
0
0
0
*
0
*
*
0
*
Second
0
0
0
0
0
0
0(3vs5)
0
0(3vs5)
*(3vs5)
0
0(3vs5)
Half Night
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
*(4vs6)
Values
0
0
0
0(3vs6)
0
0
Values
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0(4vs7)

0
0
0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0
0
*

0
0
0
0
0
0
                                   22

-------
TABLE 7.   STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF LIGHT BEAM INTERRUPTIONS RECORDED
           DURING CONTINUOUS FLOW EXPERIMENT 12.  BLUEGILL
           7.5 mg/1 Zn** (5.93 mg/1 Zn4^).




Fish
1-C
2
3
4
5
6-C


1-C
2
3
4
5
6-C


1-C
2
3
4
5
6-C

1-C
2
3
4
5
6-C
Day 1
vs
Day 2


0
0
0
0
0
0


0
0
0
0
0
0


0
0
0
0
0
*

0
0
0
0
0
0
Day 2
vs
Day 3


0
0
0
0
0
0


0
0
0
0
0
0


0
0
0
0
0
0(lvs3)

0
0
0
0
0
0
Day 3
vs
Day 4
First

0
0
0
0
0
0
Second
i
0 ^
0 
-------
TABLE 8.  STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF LIGHT BEAM INTERRUPTIONS RECORDED
          DURING CONTINUOUS FLOW EXPERIMENT 13.  BLUEGILL
          7.5 mg/1 Zn** (6.33 mg/1 Zn44") .




Fish
1-C
2
3
4
5
6

1-C
2
3
4
5
6


1-C
2
3
4
5
6

1-C
2
3
4
5
6
Day 1
vs
Day 2


0
0
0
0
0
*

0
0
0
0
0
0


0
0
0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0
0
0
Day 2
VB
Day 3


0
0
8
0
0(lvs3)

0
0
0
0
0
0


0
0
0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0
0
0
Day 3
VH
Day 4
First

0
0
8
0
o
Seconc
o !
0 "g
o 5
0 <
0 $
0 N
1
First
0
0
0
0
0
0
Second
0
0
0
0
0
0
Day
VB
Day
Half

0
*
8
0
0
I Hali
0
0
0
0
0
0

Half
0
0
0
0
0
0
Half
0
*
*
0
0
0
4 Day 5
vw
5 Day 6
Day Values

0
0(4vs6)
8
0
0
: Day Values
0
0
*
0
0
0

Night Values
0
0
0
0
*
0
Night Values
0
*(4vs6)
0(4vs6)
*
*
0
Day 6
vs
Day 7


0
0
B
0
*

0
0
*(5vs7)
it
*
0


0
0
0
Dead
Dead
0

0
*(4vs7)
0
Dead
Dead
0
Day 7
vw
Day 8


0
0
0
—
*(6vs8)

0
0
*(5vs8)
-
-
0


0
0
0
-
-
0

0
*(4vs8)
*
-
-
0
                                    24

-------
TABLE 9.   STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF LIGHT BEAM INTERRUPTIONS RECORDED
           DURING CONTINUOUS FLOW EXPERIMENT 14.  BLUEGILL
           5.6 mg/1 Zn++ (4.33 mg/1 Zn4"*").



Day 1
vs
Day 2
Day 2
vs
Day 3
Day 3
vs
Day 4
Day
vs
Day
4 Day 5
vs
5 Day 6
First Half Day Values
Fish
1
2
3
4
5
6-C


1
2
3
4
5
6-C


-
0
0
0
-
0


-
0
0
0
-
0


-
0
0
0
-
0


-
0
0
0
-
0


—
0
0
0
—
0
Second
i
- i
0 1
0 T3
0
+
0 ?
1

—
0
*
0
-
0
Half

-
0
0
0
-
0

First Half
1
2
3
4
5
6-C

1
2
3
4
5
6-C
_
0
0
0
-
0

*.
0
0
0
-
0
_
0
0
0
_
0

_
0
0
0
—
0
—
0
0
0
-
0
Second
_
0
0
0
-
0
_
0
0
0
-
0
Half
_
0
\j
0
-
0

—
0
0(4vs6)
0
—
0
Day Values

—
0
0
0
-
0

Night Values
_
0
0
0
-
0
Night Values
_
*
0
0
-
0
Day 6
vs
Day 7


—
*
*
0
_
0


-
0
0
0
—
0


—
0
0
0
-
0

—
Day 7
vs
Day 8


—
0(6vs8)
0(6vs8)
*
—
0


-
0
0
0
-
0


—
0
*
0
-
0

—
*(5vs7) 0(5vs8)
0
0
-
0
0
0
-
0
                                     25

-------
TABLE 10.   STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF LIGHT BEAM INTERRUPTIONS RECORDED
            DURING CONTINUOUS FLOW EXPERIMENT 15.  BLUEGILL
            5.6 mg/1 Zn++ (3.87 mg/1 En**).




Fish
1-C
2
3
4
5
6

1-C
2
3
4
5
6


1-C
2
3
4
5
6

1-C
2
3
4
5
6
Day 1
vs
Day 2


0
0
0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0
0
0


0
0
*
0
0
0

0
0
0
0
0
0
Day 2
vs
Day 3


0
0
0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0
0
0


0
0
0(lvs3)
0
0
0

0
0
0
0
0
0
Day 3
vs
Day 4
First

0
0
0
0
0
0
Second
i
0 '
o |
o ,
0 c
0 ?
i
First 1
0
0
0
0
0
0
Second
0
0
0
0
0
0
Day
vs
Day
Half

0
0
0
0
0
0
Half
0
0
0
0
0
0

ialf
0
*
0
*
0
0
Half
0
0
0
0
0
0
4 Day 5
vs
5 Day 6
Day Values

0
0
0
0
0
0
Day Values
0
0
0
0
0
0

Night Values
0
0(4vs6)
0
0(4vs6)
0
0
Night Values
0
*
0
0
0
0
Day 6
vs
Day 7


0
0
0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0
0
0


0
0
0
0
0
0

0
0(5vs7)
0
0
0
0
Day 7
vs
Day 8


0
0
0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0
0
0


0
0
0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0
0
0
                                    26

-------
TABLE  11.    STATISTICAL ANALYSTS OF LIGHT BEAM INTERRUPTIONS RECORDED
             DURING CONTINUOUS FLOW EXPERIMENT 16.  BLUEGILL
             4.2 mg/1 Zn4^ (3.65 mg/1 Zn**).




Fish
1
2
3
4-C
5
6

1
2
3
4-C
5
6
Day 1
vs
Day 2


0
0
0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0
0
0
Day 2
vs
Day 3


0
0
0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0
0
0
Day 3
vs
Day 4
First

0
0
0
0
*
0
Second
0 -o
0 -B
0 <
0 +
0 c
o M
Day 4
vs
Day 5
Day 5
vs
Day 6
Half Day Values

0
0
0
0
0(3vs5)
0
Half Day
0
0
0
*
0
0
First Half Night
1
2
3
4-C
•j
''

1
2
3
4-C
5
5
6
0
0
0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
*
0
0
0
0
Second
0
0
0
0
0 i
0
0 '
0
0(3vs5)
0
0
0
0

0
0
*
0
0
0
Values
0
0
0
*(4vs6)
0
0
Values
0
*
0
0
0
I)
Day 6
vs
Day 7


0
0
0(5vs7)
0
0
0

0
0
0
*4vs7)
0
0

0
*(5vs7)
D
0
*
0
Day 7
vs
Day 8


0
0
*
0
0
0

0
0
0















*4vs8)
0
0

0




*(5vs8)
0
0
0((>v
0


!i«)

Half Night Values
0
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 (4vs6) 0
0
0
*
*
*
0
0
0
0
0
0




0(5vs7) 0
0(5vs7)
*(5vs7)
0

*(5vs8)
                                    27

-------
TABLE  12.  STATISTICAL ANALYSIS  OF  LIGHT BEAM INTERRUPTIONS RECORDED
            DURING CONTINUOUS  FLOW EXPERIMENT 17.   BLUEGILL
            3.5 ing/1 Zn"*4"  (2.93 mg/1 Zn++) .




Fish
1
2
3-C
4
5
6


1
2
3-C
4
5
6

Day 1
vs
Day 2


0
0
0
0
0
0


0
0
0
0
0
0

Day 2
vs
Day 3


0
0
0
0
0
0


0
0
0
0
0
0

Day 3
vs
Day 4
First

0
0
0
0
0
*
Second
i
o -o
0 .g
0 <
o t
0 ^c
0 ?
i
Day 4
vs
Day 5
Day 5
vs
Day 6
Half Day Values

0
0
0
0
0
0(3vs5)
Half Day

0
0
0
0
0
0

First Half Night
1
2
3-C
4
5
6

1
2
3-C
4
5
6
0
0
*
0
0
0

0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 (Ivs3)
0
0
0

0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Second
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0

0
0
0
*
0
0
Values

0
0
0
0
0
0

Values
0
0
0
0
0
0
Day 6
vs
Day 7


0
0
0
0(5vs7)
0
0


0
0
0
0
0
0


0
0
0
0
0
0
Day 7
vs
Day 8


0
0
0
0
0
0


0
0
0
0
0
0


0
0
0
0
0
0
Half Night Values
0
A
0
0
0
0
0
0(4vs6)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
                                    28

-------
TABLE 13.   STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF LIGHT BKAM INTERRUPTIONS RECORDED
           DURING CONTINUOUS FLOW EXPERIMENT 18.  BLUEGILL ALL TANKS
           CONTROLS.




Fish
1
2
3
4
5
6

1
2
3
4
5
6

1
2
3
4
5
6

1
2
3
4
5
6
Day 1
vs
Day 2


-
0
0
0
0
0

—
0
0
0
0
0

_
0
0
0
0
0

_
0
0
0
0
0
Day 2
vs
Day 3


—
0
0
*
0
0

_
0
0
0
0
0

_
*
0
0
0
0

_
0
0
0
0
0
Day 3 Day 4 Day 5
vs vs vs
Day 4 Day 5 Day 6
First Half Day Values

_ _ _
000
000
*(2vs4) 0(2vs5) 0
000
000
Second Half Day Values
_ _ _
000
000
000
000
000
First Half Night Values
_ _ _
*(2vs4) 0(2vs5) 0
000
000
000
000
Second Half Night Values
_ — —
000
000
000
000
000
Day 6
vs
Day 7


—
-
0
0
0
0

—
-
0
0
0
0

—
-
0
0
-
0

-
-
0
0
-
0
Day 7
vs
Day 8


—
—
0
0
—
0

_
-
0
0
-
0

—
-
-
-
-
^

-
-
-
-
0
-
                                    29

-------
 experiments 12 and 13 (Tables 7 and 8) in which the fish were exposed
 to 7.5 mg/1 Zn~*~*~ shows that stress detection occurred in a shorter
 period of time at the lower concentration. The quicker response time
 at the lower concentration is probably the result of two factors.  The
 resistance of different individuals of the same species of fish are
 known to be highly variable and this may have contributed to the more
 rapid response. However, more than likely it was the result of an
 attempt to meter toxicant into the continuous flow system during this
 experiment. The results of zinc analysis showed that the variance  in
 concentrations reported for this experiment to be about 10 times greater
 than the variances reported for those experiments in which batch mixed
 zinc was used. The high variance in zinc concentrations was probably
 responsible for the comparatively early stress detection reported  in
 this experiment.

 Experiment 18 (13)  shows the effects of maintaining fish under continuous
 flow test conditions for eight days without feeding. Although some data
 were lost near the end of this experiment the results indicate no  ten-
 dency toward increased abnormal movement through time.

 Tables 14-A, 14-B,  15-A, 15-B, and 15-C represent the results from two
 experiments in which the procedures for testing were modified to answer
 specific questions  concerning the practical use of the monitoring  system.
 In experiment 19 (Tables 14-A and 14-B) three basic questions were posed;
 (1)  could the time  period between the transfer of fish to the test cham-
 bers be reduced from the normal four-day period to two  days,  (2) what
 effects would feeding have on the results, and (3)  what effects would a
 short term exposure to zinc over a six and one half hour period have on
 the movement patterns.

 In this experiment  the time interval between fish transfer and initiation
 of data recording was reduced to two days.  The results  show that the two-
 day readjustment period  is probably sufficient.  During  this experiment
 the test  fish were  fed two pellets of Purina Trout  Chow developer  daily
 at 11:00  a.m.  Based  on the results obtained feeding had no detectable
 effect  on  the movement patterns recorded.

 To  answer  the question concerning short term exposure to zinc,  a batch
 mixed  zinc solution  of 10  mg/1 Zn"^" was started  through the system at
 7:00  a*m.  on  day 5 of the  experiment. At  1:00 p.m.  the  flow was  returned
 to  the  normal dilution water.  The  effluent  samples  collected  at  1:00 p.m.
 showed  the following  zinc  concentrations  in mg/1 Zn"^":   Tank  one,  7.88,
 tank  two,  7.91;  tank  three, not  detected;  tank four,  7.88;  tank  five,
 7.96; and  tank six, 7.79.  By  12:00 a.m.  on  day 5 zinc analyses  showed all
 effluents  contained <-0.5 mg/1  Zn*"*".  The results  from this  short  term
 exposure showed  that  during exposure or after there were no abnormal
movement patterns recorded.

 Experiment 20  (Tables 15-A, 15-B,  and 15-C was run  for  a total of  twenty
days during which the effects  of only two days'  adjustment  after handling,
 feeding during the experiment,  and  response  to short  term  stress were
                                   30

-------
TABLE  14-A.  STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF LIGHT BEAM  INTERUPTIONS  RECORDED
              DURING DAYS 1-8 OF CONTINUOUS FLOW  EXPERIMENT  19.
              BLUEGILL INTERMITTENT Zn"*"'"  STRESS.



Fish
1
2
3-C
4
5
6

1
2
3-C
4
5
6

1
2
3-C
4
5
6

1
2
3-C
4
5
6
Day 1
vs
Day 2

0
0
0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0
*
0
Day 2
vs
Day 3

0
0
0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0
0(lvs3)
0
Day 3
vs
Day 4
First
0 -a"
0 -3
0 <
0 +
0 c
0 !
Second
0
0
0
0
0
0
First
0
0
0
0
0
0
Second
0
0
0
0
0
0
Day 4
vs
Day 5
Half Day
~~ 0
0
0
0
0
0

Half Day
0
0
0
0
0
0
Day 5
vs
Day 6
Values
0
0
0
0
0
0
Values
0
0
0
0
0
0
Day 6
vs
Day 7

0
0
0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0
0
0
Day 7
vs
Day 8

0
0
0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0
0
0
Half Night Values
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Half Night Values
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
                                      31

-------
TABLE 14-B.   STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF LIGHT BEAM INTERRUPTIONS RECORDED
              DURING DAYS 8-10 OF CONTINUOUS FLOW EXPERIMENT 19.
              BLUEGILL INTERMITTENT Zn4"1" STRESS.




Fish
1
2
3-C
4
5
6

1
2
3-C
4
5
6

I
2
3-C
4
5
6

1
2
3-C
4
5
6
Day 8
vs
Day 9


0
0
0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0
0
0
Day 9
vs
Day 10


0
0
0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0
0
0



First Half Day Values







Second Half Day Vnlues






First Half Night Values






Second Half Night Values






                                    32

-------
re-examined. In addition, during one segment of the experiment the fish
were exposed to zinc until stress detection occurred. After stress
detection flow was returned to the normal dilution water and percent
survival and recovery patterns were examined.

The results given in Tables 15-A, 15-B, and 15-C agree with those
presented in Tables 14-A and 14-B concerning both feeding during the
experiment and the time between handling and data recording. In both
cases the effects of these changes in procedure were not detected in
the movement patterns. At 1:00 p.m. on day 7 of this experiment zinc
flow was started into the test chambers and continued until 7:30 p.m.
of the same day. The concentrations of zinc in mg/1 recorded in the
effluent at the time flow was returned to the normal dilution water
were: tank one, 13.32; tank two, <.08; tank three, 11.39; tank four,
12.72; tank five, 13.32; and tank six, 12.59. By 8:30 a.m. on day 8
of this experiment the effluent zinc concentrations were less than
0.300 in all cases. As was the case in experiment 19, this short term
stress did not cause stress detection during the period of zinc addition
or for the period following zinc addition.

To determine the percent survival and recovery patterns of the fish once
stress detection occurred, zinc flow was re-initiated at 1:00 p.m. on
day 13 of this experiment (experiment 20). Between 8:00 and 9:00 p.m.
on day 13 the zinc concentration reached a maximum of: 7.51 for tank
one; less than .05 for tank two; 7.49 for tank three; 7.52 for tank four;
7.49 for tank five; and 7.54 for tank six. The concentrations remained
at the above values until the statistical analyses showed stress detec-
tion during the first half night values on day 14. As soon as stress
detection occurred the flow was returned to normal dilution water. At
10:00 a.m. on day 15 zinc analyses showed the following effluent concen-
trations: 0.70 for tank one, 0.09 for tank two; 0.62 for tank three;
0.57 for tank four; 0.67 for tank five; and 0.44 for tank six. Stress
detection continued to be registered for two consecutive time intervals
following the initial detection, but after that no stress detection was
registered and the frequency of abnormal movement patterns returned to
pre-stress levels within 48 hours. To determine how the light beam
interruptions recorded for day 1 compared to those after the two stress
periods, a comparison was made between day 1 and day 20. The results
showed no abnormal movement patterns, indicating a complete recovery to
pre-stress levels. This does not, however, mean that the fish would
respond to a third stress period in the same way, nor does it indicate
an increase or decrease in sensitivity. In practical application after
stress detection the system should probably receive a new set of test
fish, added two a day until a complete exchange of fish had been made.
In this way the system need not be shut down, and the problems of
increased or decreased resistance to stress need not become a serious
consideration.

For the first ten days of experiment 20 from 1:00 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. the
number of light beam interruptions occurring during consecutive ten-
minute intervals was recorded manually for each photocell. The data
                                   33

-------
TABLE  15-A.
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF LIGHT i'.EAM INTERRUPTIONS
RECORDED DURING DAYS 1-8 OF CONTINUOUS FLOW EXPERIMENT
20.  BLUEGTLL (Zn"*4" ADDITION TO STRESS DETECTION).




Fish
1
2-C
3
4
5
6

1
2-C
3
4
5
6
Day 1
vs
Day 2


0
0
0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0
0
*
Day 2
vs
Day 3


0
0
0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0
0
0(lvs3)
Day 3
vs
Day 4
First

0
0
0
0
0
0
Second
0
0
0
0
0
0
Day
vs
Dav
Half

0
0
0
0
*
0
4 Day 5
vs
5 Day 6
Day Values

0
0
0
0
0(4vs6)
0
Day 6
vs
Day 7


0
0
0
0
*
0
Day 7
vs
Day 8


0
0
0
0
*(6vs8)
0
Half Day Values
0
0
0
0
0
0
First Half
1
2-C
3
4
5
6

1
2-C
3
4
5
6
0
0
0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Second
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Half
0
0
0
it
0
0
i —
T3
0 <"
0 3
0 t
0 N
0 { 	
Night Values
0
0
0
0
0
0
Night Values
0
0
0
0(4vs6)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0
0
0

0
0
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
*
0
0

0
0
0
0
0
0

0
0
0(6vs8)
0
*
0
                                   34

-------
TABLE  15-B.
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF LIGHT BEAM INTERRUPTIONS
RECORDED DURING DAYS 8-14 OF CONTINUOUS FLOW EXPERIMENT
20.  BLUEGILL (Zn"*^" ADDITION TO STRESS DETECTION).




Fish
1
2-C
3
4
5
6

1
2-C
3
4
5
6

1
2-C
3
4
5
6



]
;M:
'i
/»
5
h
Day 8
vs
Day 9


0
0
0
0
0(6vs9)
0

0
0
0
0(7vs9)
0
0

0
0
0
0
0
0



0
0
0
0
0(7v:;9)
0
Day 9
vs
Day 10


0
0
0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0
0
0



0
0
0
0
0
0
Day
vs
Day
First

0
0
0
0
0
0
Second
0
0
0
0
0
0
First
0
0
0
0
0
0


Second
0
0
0
0
0
0
10 Day 11
vs
11 Day 12
Half Day Values

0
0
0
0
0
*
Half Day Values
0
*
0
0
0
0
Half Night Values
o !
o -g
o 5
0 <
o t
0 «§
1
1
Half Night Value.
0
0
0
0
0
0
Day 12
vs
Day 13


0
0
0
0
*
0(llvsl3)

*
0(llvsl3)
0
0
0
0

0
0
a
0
0
0


3
0
0
0
0
0
0
Day 13
vs
Day 14


0
0
0
0
0(12vsl4)
0

0(12 vs!4;
0
*
0
0
o

*
0
*
0
0
0



*
0
0
0
*
0
                                     35

-------
TABLE   15-C.   STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF LIGHT BEAM INTERRUPTIONS
               RECORDED DURING DAYS 14-20 OF CONTINUOUS FLOW EXPERIMENT
               20.  BLUEGILL (Zn"*4" ADDITION TO STRESS DETECTION).



Day 14
vs
Day 15
Day 15
vs
Day 16
Day 16 Day 17
vs
vs
Day 17 Day 18
First Half Day
Fish
1
2-C
3
4
5
6

*
0
*
0
*
0

0(l4vsl6)
0
0(14vsl6)
0
0(l4vsl6)
*

0
0
0
0
0
*(15vsl7)
Values

0
0
0
0
0
0(15vsl8)
Day 18
vs
Day 19


0
0
0
0
0
0
Day 19
vs
Day 20


0
0
0
0
0
0
Second Half Day Values
1
2-C
3
4
5
6
*
0
0(13vsl5)
0
0
0
*(14vsl6)
0
0
0
0
0
*!4vsl7)
0
0
0
0
0
0(14vsl8)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
First Half Night Values
1
2-C
3
4
5
6
0(13vsl5)
0
0(13vsl5)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Second Half Night Values
1
2-C
3
4
5
6
0(13vsl5)
0
0
0
0(13vsl5)
*
0
0
0
0
0
*(14vsl6)
0
0
0
0
0
*(!4vsl7)
0
0
0
0
*
0(14vsl8)
0
0
0
0
0(17vsl9)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
                                    36

-------
collected during this ten-day period were used to indicate the desir-
ability of reducing the time lag from the minimum five and one half
hour period used in the previous analyses to one hour. The results of
this initial limited analysis are sufficiently promising to warrant
further study. The monitoring system as it presently exists is not
sophisticated enough to monitor time intervals less than the hourly
intervals readily handled by the camera recording system. However,
plans are presently under way to completely automate the data acqui-
sition and analysis components of the system through direct interfacing
with a mini-computer. When complete automation is completed all time
intervals and photocell levels can be thoroughly investigated.

The monitoring equipment used in these experiments is limited by tur-
bidity. Turbidimetric determinations made under normal operating condi-
tions showed that arroneous counts were registered when the turbidity
of the water reached 15 APHA units with the 650 mu filters in place and
27 APHA units without the filters. This limited operating range presented
no problems in the laboratory studies but would require careful consid-
eration in field studies. The levels of turbidity over which the system
could operate can be increased significantly by increasing the lamp out-
put and providing better light beam-photocell alignment. Even with a
significant increase in operating range there would be conditions under
which effective measurements could not be made. The advantages gained
from continuous monitoring by this method would have to be weighed
against the potential loss of toxicity resulting from the reduction
or removal of suspended material.
                                   37

-------
                             SECTION V

                   FISH REPRODUCTION AND GROWTH

Methods and materials;  Bluegill sunfish were seined from a local pond
and held for several months in the laboratory in the same dilution
water, with the same photoperiod and water temperatures, as for the
experiments described in Section IV.

Starting April 13, approximately 200 fish (approximate total lengths:
8-15 cm; weights: 10-80 gms.) were brought into breeding condition by
exposing them to a photoperiod of 16 1/2 hours of light, water tempera-
tures of 31-32°C, and by feeding them twice daily with frozen Gordon
Formula (Axelrod, 1952) and once daily with live mealworms.  The dim-
ming system described earlier simulated a 1/2 hour dawn starting at
6 a.m. and a 1/2 hour dusk starting at 10 p.m.

On May 4 most of the fish could be sexed by gently squeezing the sides
and observing whether eggs of milt was extruded, and three females and
one male were placed in each of twenty 20-gallon tanks (standard
aquaria, long type, Ramfab Aquarium Products cat. no. RA-20L).

One standard clay flowerpot (upper rim-to-rim diameter = 6 inches) was
placed on its side in each tank for the females to hide from the ag-
gressive attacks of the males.  An artificial nest, described by Eaton
(1970) was also placed in each tank and five smooth pebbles, 2-3 cm in
diameter, were scattered on the bottom of each nest.

One toxicant delivery apparatus was used for each set of five tanks
receiving one concentration, and one water delivery apparatus was used
for five control tanks which received no added zinc.  The toxicant
delivery apparatus combined a toxicant dipper and needle valve des-
cribed by Mount and Brungs (1967) with a water delivery system des-
cribed by Brungs and Mount (1970).  The dilution water was the same as
that used in the experiments described in Section IV.  The zinc con-
centrations for the reproduction study were based on the lowest con-
centration used in the fish breathing experiments; i.e. 2.5 mg/1.  Tanks
6-10 received .250 mg/1 zinc (1/10 of 2.5 mg/1), tanks 16-20 received
.025 mg/1 zinc (1/100 of 2.5), tanks 11-15 received no added zinc and
served as controls.  In addition, tanks 1-5 received 1/100 the 96-hour
TL50 (median tolerance limit) for adult bluegill sunfish exposed to
zinc in municipal tapwater:  .075 mg/1.  The initial zinc concentration
used in the stock jug of each toxicant delivery apparatus was calculated
to yield the desired concentration in the tanks.  The concentrations in
the tanks were measured by atomic absorption spectropho tome try and were
lower than desired, so the concentrations of the stock solutions were
adjusted until the correct concentrations were obtained in the tanks.

The flow rate to each tank was approximately 100 ml/min.  The water
entered at the top and front of the tank and was removed from the
                                   39

-------
 bottom carrying some detritus with it, by means of a sheathed standpipe
 at the rear of the tank.

 A plastic egg hatching box (20.5 cm long, 7.0 cm wide, and 15.5 cm
 deep) hung on the front of each aquarium and was large enough to accept
 three egg cups.  The egg cups were made from Turtox plastic jars (5.5
 cm o.d., 6.8 cm tall), with the bottoms removed.  In use, each end of
 the cup was covered with a piece of ladies' woven nylon hose held in
 place with rubber bands.  Each cup rested on an airstone cemented to
 the bottom of the hatching box.  A piece of plexiglas (20 cm long, 6.3
 cm wide,  and 0.6 cm thick) fit into grooves in the hatching box and
 rested on top of the cups to keep them from floating.

 Water siphoned from each tank into the hatching boxes and was returned
 to the tank by an air lift.   Another air lift delivered water from the
 hatching box to a plastic rearing chamber (38.0 cm long, 30.5 cm wide,
 and 17.5 cm deep) for rearing newly-hatched fry.  Thus the eggs were
 hatched and the fry reared in the same water as their parents.   Water
 drained from each rearing chamber through a rectangular opening (8.8 cm
 wide,  1.8 cm high)  into a trough.  The bottom of the opening was 14.5
 cm from the bottom of the pan, and the opening was covered by .8 mm
 mesh nylon netting.

 The fish  in each tank were fed two grams of frozen Gordon Formula
 (Axelrod, 1952)  twice a day  and eight live mealworms once a day.  The
 tanks  were cleaned  once a week by siphoning detritus from the bottom.

 At  1 p.m. every day,  the pebbles in each nest were removed and  examined
 closely for eggs.   If eggs were present, a plastic chamber (same dimen-
 sions  as  above) was filled with water from the tank and the nest was
 removed from the  tank and placed upside down in the chamber over an
 airstone.   A new nest was substituted immediately for the old one.

 A subsample of  200 eggs  was  removed from the nest and placed in  a
 hatching  cup, which in  turn was placed in the hatching box.   After 48
 hours, the number of  fry in both the  egg cup and the chamber were
 counted,  by  pipetting them into petri dishes and using a Dazor model
 M209 fluorescent magnifier and a hand tally  counter.   The hatch  in  the
 subsample of eggs in  the cup was assumed to  be proportional  to the  hatch
 in the nest, and the  numbers of fry and eggs in the  cup  were  used to
 back-calculate  the number  of eggs  spawned in the nest:

 Total No. Eggs  _ No. Fry  X  (No.  Eggs  in Cup   No. Fry  in Cup) + No. Eggs
    In Nest       In Nest                                         In Cup

When less than 200 eggs were spawned,  the number of  eggs  in  the nest and
 the number of fry in  the hatching  chamber were counted directly, with-
out removing a subsample.
                                   40

-------
Fish that were dead or that had lost their equilibrium were removed as
soon as they were noticed.  In addition, six fish had an eye disease
that started as a white spot and gradually consumed the entire eye, and
these fish were also removed.  Fish that were removed before the end of
the experiment were weighed, measured and sexed—unless they were too
decomposed.  Fish that were removed and could be sexed were replaced by
a fish of the same sex from a stock of ripe fish kept in dechlorinated
tapwater containing no added zinc, until July 20, when no further re-
placements were made.  The breeding portion of the experiment termina-
ted August 19, when all the remaining adult fish were killed, weighed,
measured and sexed.  The condition and weight of the genads was also
recorded.

Fifty fry from the first spawning in each tank were placed in the
rearing chamber for that tank.  Newly-hatched brine shrimp were rinsed
in dechlorinated tapwater and placed in each rearing chamber twice a
day for the fish to feed upon.

A census of the rearing chambers of July 8 revealed that very few fish
were surviving, so changes were made in the apparatus and methods.
Some of the fry may have washed through the netting of the rearing
chambers, so the chambers were modified by drilling five 1.1 cm holes
on centers 11.5 cm above the bottom of the chambers and covering them
with a piece of woven nylon.  All surviving bluegills were transferred
to the modified chambers on July 8 and 9, and all fry hatched after
July 9 were placed in chambers of the new design.

In addition, we learned that brine shrimp were too large for bluegill
fry and that the National Water Quality Laboratory, Duluth, Minnesota,
was successfully feeding plankton to baby bluegills (James M. McKim, III,
personal communication).  Consequently, starting July 23, plankton was
obtained regularly from nearby ponds, and fed, after straining through
a 0.8 mm mesh net, twice a day to the fish.  Samples of the plankton
were examined regularly under the microscope and never appeared to be
very rich, so the diet was supplemented with a pinch of TetraMin pow-
dered baby fish food twice a day.  Newly-hatched brine shrimp were fed
to the fish starting approximately the third week of growth.

Since no spawnings ever occurred in some tanks, the rearing chambers
for these tanks received fry from other tanks.  In addition to transfers
of fry made within chambers at the same zinc concentration, some fry
were taken from high zinc concentrations and put into chambers con-
taining low concentrations, and vice-versa.

The fry in each chamber were counted and total lengths determined 30,
60 and 90 days after introduction to the rearing chamber.  Total lengths
were determined by placing each fish in a glass petri dish over a metric
ruler.

Dissolved oxygen concentrations in the breeding tanks were determined
by a YSI oxygen meter, and temperatures by a mercury thermometer.  Since
                                 41

-------
 water from the breeding tanks was delivered directly to the rearing
 chambers by air lifts, we assumed that the water characteristics in the
 tanks and chambers were the same.  This assumption was confirmed for
 zinc by measuring zinc concentrations in the tanks and chambers at
 random intervals, but D.O. and temperature were not measured in the
 rearing chambers.

 Results and discussion;  Zinc concentrations, dissolved oxygen concen-
 trations (D.O.), and temperatures in the breeding tanks are shown in
 Table 16.  On August 4, 1971, a new central air conditioning system be-
 gan operating, and the room temperature was lowered 5.6°C in 12 hours.
 As a result,  the temperatures in the breeding tanks reached a new
 steady state, approximately 4°C lower than the mean temperatures re-
 corded earlier.   Since a spawning occurred for the first time in tank 9
 after the drop in temperature, and six additional spawnings occurred
 in other tanks,  the temperature drop did not seem to affect spawning.
 However, eggs from a spawning on August 4 that were exposed to a drop
 in water temperature of 12°C showed a very low percentage hatch (2%)
 and were not  included in the results.

 The dechlorinated tapwater delivered to the control tanks (tanks 11-15)
 contained a zinc concentration ranging from .002 - .062 mg/1.   The mean
 zinc concentrations and the standard diviations in all the tanks are
 shown in Table 16.   Nominal zinc concentrations will be used in the
 rest of  the text.

 Data on  the adult bluegills used as breeders are shown in Table 17 .
 Although males and  females were approximately the same size when they
 were introduced  to  the breeding tanks on  May 4,  Table 17  shows that the
 surviving males  were generally heavier and longer than the surviving
 females when  the breeding  portion of the  experiment terminated August 19.
 Also, mortality  among females  was proportionally greater than  it was
 among males.   The disparity in growth and survival between males  and
 females was probably due to biting and butting  attacks  by the  males.
 Most of  the dead females had tattered fins  and  scales missing  from their
 sides.  Females  that were  in tanks with very aggressive males  would feed
 hesitantly, even when food was placed near  their flowerpot shelters.
 Most of  the fish at  all zinc concentrations were still  ripe on August
 19,  and  there  were no trends  in adult fish  weights,  lengths, survival,
 or gonad weights that could be attributed to the effects of zinc.

 The  variation  in female mortality from tank to  tank probably indicates
 some variation in aggressiveness  from male  to male,  and variation in
 aggressiveness among  males may explain why  there were some tanks  at  all
 concentrations where  no spawning  occurred (Table 18).   For example,  the
male in tank 17  (a tank receiving .025 mg/1 zinc) killed,  or contribu-
 ted  to the death of eight females  in  succession,  and no  spawning  ever
occurred in this tank.  Once a spawning did occur in  a  tank, it was  high-
ly likely that several more would occur.  In contrast to  the multiple
spawnings obtained in the control  tanks and tanks receiving  zinc  con-
                                   42

-------
 1
 2
 3
 4
 5

 6
 7
 8
 9
10

11
12
13
14
15

16
17
18
19
20
       Table 16. Zinc and dissolved oxygen concentrations,
                 and temperatures in breeding  tanks
Tank  Zn*
.075
.075
.075
.075
.075

.250
.250
.250
.250
.250

.000
.000
.000
.000
.000

.025
.025
.025
.025
.025
              Measured zinc con-
              centrations (mq/1)
N
14
14
14
14
14
15
15
15
15
15
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
Mean
.071
.081
.079
.076
.074
.231
.232
.230
.234
.249
.028
.019
.019
.020
.017
.028
.040
.041
.035
.033
S.D.
.043
.047
.039
.032
.028
.055
.048
.045
.043
.044
.023
.007
.010
.014
.011
.012
.019
.018
.017
.012
                                P.O.  (mg/1)
N
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
Mean
6.1
6.3
5.9
6.0
5.8
5.5
5.3
5.4
5.1
5.3
5.5
5.7
5.5
5.7
5.4
5.6
5.4
5.8
5.7
5.4
S.D.
0.5
0.2
0.7
0.7
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.7
0.9
0.8
0.6
0.5
0.6
0.5
0.8
0.7
0.7
0.5
0.5
0.7
Temperature ( C)
4
4
4
4
4

4
4
4
4
4

4
4
4
4
4

4
4
4
4
4
Mean

30.8
31.2
31.6
31.6
31.6

31.0
30,
30.
30,
30.1
30.
30.
30.
30.
30.4

30.5
30.4
30.4
30.4
29.9
S.D.

1.0
0
0
0
0.5
.5
.5
.5
0.4
0.8
0.8
0.9
0.8

0.9
0.6
0.7
0.9
0.9

0.6
0,
0,
0.8
0.5
* Nominal zinc concentrations (mg/1)

N-number of readings
                                    43

-------
 Table 17Survival of adult bluegills and weights, lengths,
         and  condition of gonads of adults at end of
         breeding experiment
Tank
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
Zn
(mg/1 )
.071
.081
.079
.076
.074
.231
.232
.230
.234
.249
.028
.019
.019
.020
.017
.028
.040
.041
.035
.033
°No. males
removed be-
fore end of
experiment
0
0
*1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
°No. females
removed be-
fore end of
experiment
*3
4
0
*1
1
5
0
2
3
0
4
1
3
*2
*2
0
*9
2
2
5




Wts. Standard
(gms) lengths (cm)
61.8
69.6
48.2
60.9
37.6
69.7
71.7
34.0
62.7
26.1
61.3

78.4
67.6
72.6
72.5
70.0
93.4
84.8
31.6
11.5
11.5
10.5
11.6
10.2
12.1
12.0
10.0
11.7
8.9
11.7

11.9
12.1
12.3
12.3
11.8
12.9
13.0
9.6

Males
No.
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
 One fish removed because eye was diseased.
 per tank contracted this disease.
No more than one fish
aFish with eye disease, dead fish, and fish that had  lost their
 equilibrium were removed immediately.  A ratio of three  females
 and one male was maintained per tank by replacement  of fish  until
 July 20, 1971.
      values (with ranges in parentheses)  are shown  for  tanks
 containing more than one female.
                                44

-------
 Fish removed at end of experiment
                                          Females
Gonads
Wt(gms)
1.2
1.5
0.9
1.7
< .1
1.0
1.2
0.2
0.9
0.5
0.8

0.9
1.6
1.0
0.8
2.1
1.0
1.0
< .1
Wts. Standard
Condition*- (gms) lengths(cm) No.
R



N



R

R

R

R
R
R
R

N
13.1 7.2 1
0
24.2 16.6-33.6) 9.1(8.5-9.8) 3
31.2 23.0-39.4) 9.6(8.9-10.2) 2
29.4 23.7-35.0) 9.6(9.4-9.7) 2
0
29.1(22.0-35.4) 9.4(8.3-10.0) 3
44.6(38.3-51 .0)10.4(10.0-10.8)2
35.2(29.2-41.3 9.9(9.5-10.3) 2
36.2(25.2-46.4) 9.7(9.0-10.3) 3
0
31.7(24.6-35.2) 9.5(9.0-9.8) 4
38.4(34.2-42.7)10.1(9.6-10.6) 2
39.1 10.3 1
21.6 8.7 1
28.6(28.1-29.0) 9.5(9.3-9.7) 2
0
13.4 7.7 1
26.8 9.3 1
20.6(7.8-32.1) 8.5(6.6-9.7) 4
Gonads

Wt(gms) Condition*-
!./>

1.6(0.1-2.6)
2.3(1.3-3.3)
2.8(1.5-4.1)

1.3(0.5-2.2)
2.7(0.6-4.8)
2.4(2.3-2.6)
3.2(2.4-4.1)

2.6(2.0-3.3)
3.0(3.0-3.1)
1.7
0.6
1.6(1.3-1.9)

0.1
2.9
1.6(0.4-3.5)
1R

2R, IN
2R
2R

3R
1R, IN
2R
3R
j
4Rd
2R
1R
1R
2R

IN
1R
4Rd
CR = ripe, and indicates that milt was extruded when the sides of the
 males were squeezed;  or in the case of females,  that the ovaries were
 swollen and filled with pinhead-size eggs.  N = not ripe, and indicates
 that the testes weighed less than .1 gtn and no milt was extruded from
 males;  in the case of females, no eggs were visible.  The number of
 ripe and unripe females in each tank is shown.

 An extra female was added to tanks 11 and 20.
                                    45

-------
 centrations of  .075 and .025 mg/1, however, only a single spawning in
 one tank occurred at a concentration  of .250 mg/1 zinc (Table 18).  Since
 eggs or milt could be extruded from all the breeders at the beginning
 of the experiment, and since most of the fish had ripe gonads when the
 experiment terminated, the results in Table 18 indicate that a zinc
 concentration of .250 inhibits spawning in ripe fish.

 Table 18 also shows the percentage hatch in each tank. Where more than
 one hatching was used, the mean percentage hatch is shown, with the
 range in parentheses. Hatching data from eight spawnings were not used
 because some of the eggs were hatching in the breeding tanks in less
 than 24 hours at temperatures of 30-31 C. Attempts to remove eggs from
 these nests by pipetting generally caused the egg membranes to rupture,
 releasing the fry.  In these cases, the percentage hatch in 48 hours  of
 the eggs that were transferred without repturing was confounded with
 the 48-hour survival of the fry that were also unavoidably transferred
 to the egg hatching cups.  A hatch of 21% from one spawning in tank 16
 that was heavily fungused was also excluded.  The hatch obtained from
 the one spawning at the highest zinc concentration was low (43%) , but
 within the range of values in the other zinc  concentrations.

 The number of fry introduced to the old rearing chambers with 0.8 mm
 mesh outlets  and the number introduced to the modified chambers with
 smaller mesh  outlets are shown in Table 19. The introductions are
 shown in chronological sequence from left to  right across the rows.
 For example,  two introductions of fry were made to rearing chamber 4:
 one introduction of 50 fry from tank 4, and a later introduction of
 51 fry from tank 1,  after  inspection revealed that there were no sur-
 vivors from the  first introduction.  Growth and survival data in the
 right-hand portion  of the  table were always obtained on fish from the
 last  introduction reported in the left side of the table.  Survival of
 young  bluegills  at  all zinc concentrations  was poor.  Mortality was
 highest  during the  first weeks, and  can probably be attributed to
 starvation. The  plankton collections that were fed to the  young blue-
 gills  starting August  24 were never  very rich, and the powdered baby
 fish food may not have  been utilized.  Once  the young were  large enough
 to  feed  on  brine shrimp, survival improved  as shown by the reduction
 in mortality between 30, 60 and 90 days as  compared to the mortality
 between  day 0 and day  30.  At a zinc  concentration of .250  mg/1,  however,
 no bluegills survived  longer than 30 days.  Fry obtained from eggs
 spawned  in  a zinc concentration of .250 mg/1  and fry obtained  from eggs
 spawned  in  other zinc  concentrations were placed in .250 mg/1  zinc.
Most of  the fry  from all these  sources  died within three days  in 250 mg/1
 zinc and were visible on the bottom  of  the  rearing chambers.  In  addition,
 fry taken from .250 mg/1 zinc and placed  in control tank 11 showed poor
 survival: only four  fish survived for 30 days,  one for 60  days,  and
none for 90 days.

An experiment on  the effects  on young bluegill  of momentary exposure
 to a high zinc concentration was  inadvertently  conducted when  a  hose
                                    46

-------
  Table 18.     Spawning of adult bluegills and percentage
               hatch of eggs at four zinc concentrations
Tank
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
Mean
zinc
concen-
tration
.071
.081
.079
.076
.074
.231
.232
.230
.234
.249
.028
.019
.019
.020
.017
.028
.040
.041
.035
.033
Total
no. of
eggs
spawned3
8414
0
10647
4736
0
0
0
0
1009
0
7188
0
0
227
5849
4274
0
0
10202
0
Total
no. of
spawnings
3
0
8
5
0
0
0
0
1
0
4
0
0
2
7
3
0
0
5
0
Mean no.
of eggs
per
spawning0
2805
0
1331
1184
0
0
0
0
1009
0
:i797
0
0
114
985
1425
0
0
2040
0
Percen-
tage a h
hatch3' b
72 (71-72)
0
66 (49-78)
57 (44-68)
0
0
0
0
43
0
62 (35-76)
0
0
33
73 (47-96)
86


78 (65-90)

aNumber of eggs and percentage hatch were not determined for all
 spawnings because of premature hatching, fungus infestation,
 etc. (see text).

^Where more than one hatch was used, the mean percentage hatch
 is shown, with the range in parentheses.
                                   47

-------
       Table 19.  Survival  and growth  of  bluegills in four
                 zinc concentrations
Rearing
chamber
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
Zn
mg/1
.071
.081
.079
.076
.074
.231
.232
.230
.234
.249
.028
.019
.019
.020
.017
.028
.040
.041
.035
.033
No. of fry
introduced
to old
rearing
chambers
50[l]a
50[3]
50[4]

50[15],51[15]

5o[n]
50[1 1]
50[15]
50[11]


No. of fry
introduced
to new
rearing
chambers
50[1]
50[4"
50f3"
51fT
,45[19]

50[3]
53[9]
58[9"
50[1"
51 [9!

50[11



,58[19]


],51[9]


50[15],40[14]
50[15]
50[16]


50[19]



56[16]

51 [19
50[19


]
]

Mean total lengths
30
21.8(5)b
13.2(4
(0)
21.0(4)
12.2(19)c
(0)
(0)
(0)
(0)
(0)
6.8(4)


9.5(2)
	 d
(0)

(0)
14.4(7)

Days
60
28.8(5)
20.3(3
(0)
24.5(4)
19.2(18)
(0)
(0)
(0)
(0)
(0)
10.0(1)

•
21.2(2)
20.0(2)
(0)

(0)
19.3(6)

(mm)
90
38.8(5)
34.3(3)
(0)
36.6(4)
26.9(14)
(0)
(0)
(0)
(0)
(0)
(0)


27.8(2)
33.0(1)
(0)

(o)
30.6(6)

a Numbers in brackets indicate the number of the tank where  the  fry
    were obtained.
b Numbers in parentheses indicate the number of fish.
c At least 2 fish died as a result of a zinc soil!  on day  22 (see
    text).
d The fish in chamber 15 were not counted or weighed on day  30.
                                  48

-------
separated from a connector and fell into rearing chamber 5 while a
stock bottle was being filled with concentrated zinc solution. The
hose was removed from the tank in a fraction of a second and the young
bluegill were transferred to the proper zinc concentration within two
minutes, but two of the 21 fish died within 15 minutes. During the
two minute period, the 22-day-old bluegills had been exposed to a zinc
concentration of 9.18 mg/1, although the concentration initially may
have been higher in portions of the chamber. There were 19 survivors
on day 30, 18 on day 60, and 14 on day 90. After the initial deaths,
survival in chamber 5 was comparable to survival in other tanks at
the same concentrations.

In summary, it appears that a zinc concentration of .250 mg/1 inhibits
spawning in adult bluegills brought into breeding condition in dechlor-
inated municipal water containing no added zinc, and causes complete
mortality of bluegill fry. Water containing no added zinc and zinc
concentrations of .075 and .025 mg/1 do not have these effects.

The lowest zinc concentration tested in the apparatus for monitoring
fish breathing was 2.55 mg-1. This concentration was detected by the
monitoring method, and the reproduction and growth experiment shows
that 1/100 or 1/34 of this concentration might be safe for chronic
exposure of bluegills, but that 1/10 of this concentration certainly
is not.
                                   49

-------
                              SECTION VI

                           ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This research was carried out in the Aquatic Biology Laboratory of
the Biology Department and Center for Environmental Studies,  Virginia
Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg,  Virginia,  24061.

The guidance and help provided by Dr. Clyde Y. Kramer, of the Statistics
Department, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University is
gratefully acknowledged. Dr. Richard E. Sparks, Virginia Polytechnic
Institute and State University, worked on the reproduction and growth
studies. The cooperation and suggestions of the Environmental Protection
Agency Project Officer, Dr. James M. McKim, III, were greatly appreciated.
                                   51

-------
                             SECTION VII

                           LITERATURE CITED


American Public Health Association.  1965.  Standard Methods  for  the
     Examination of Water and Wastewater. 12th ed.,  769  pp. New York.

Axelrod, J. H. R.  1952.  Tropical Fish as a Hobby.  George Allen
     and Unwin, Ltd.  London.  264 pp.

Brett, J. R.  1968.  Personal communication.

Brungs, William A.  1969.  Chronic toxicity of zinc  to the fathead
     minnow, Pimephales promelas Rafinesque.  Trans. Amer. Fish.
     Soc.  98(2):  272-279.

Brungs, W. A., and D. I. Mount.  1970.  A water delivery system for small
     fish-holding tanks.  Trans. Amer. Fish. Soc.  99(4):  799-802.

Cairns, J., Jr.  1970.  New concepts for managing  aquatic life
     systems.  Jour. Water Poll. Contr. Fed.  42(1): 77-82.

Cairns, J., Jr., K. L. Dickson, Richard E. Sparks, and William T.
     Waller.  1970.  A preliminary report on rapid biological
     information systems for water pollution control. Jour. Water
     Poll. Contr. Fed.  42(5):  685-703.

Cairns, Jr., Jr.  (in press).  Management problems in multiple use
     of aquatic ecosystems.  River Ecology and the Impact of  Man.
     Clarence A. Carlson (Ed.).

Davis, R. E. and J. E. Bardach.  1964.  Time co-opdinated prefeeding
     activity in fish. Animal Behaviour XIII  (1):  154-162.

Eaton, S. G.  1970.  Chronic malathion toxicity to the bluegill
     (Lepomis macrochirus Rafinesque). Water Research.   4:  673-684.

Moore, J. G., Jr., Commissioner.  1968.  Water Quality Criteria.
     Report of the National Technical Advisory Committee to the
     Secretary of the Interior.  U.S. Govt. Printing Office.   234 pp.

Mount, Donald I. and Charles E. Stephen.  1967. A method for
     establishing acceptable toxicant limits for fish- Malathion
     and the butoxyethanol ester of 2,4-D.  Trans. Amer. Fish.
     Soc.,  96(2):  185-193.

Mount, D. I., and W. A. Brungs.  1967.  A simplified dosing apparatus
     for fish toxicology studies. Water Research.  1:  21-29.
                                   53

-------
 Mount,  Donald  I.   1968.  Chronic toxicity of copper to fathead
      minnows  (Pimephales promelas Rafinesque). Water Research,
      2:   215-223.

 Scheier,  A. and J. Cairns, Jr.  1966.  Persistence of gill damage in
      Lepomis gibbosus  following a brief exposure to alkyl benzene
      sulfonate.  Not.  Nat. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia, No. 391:
      1-7.

 Shirer, H. W., J. Cairns, Jr., and William T. Waller.  1968. A
      simple apparatus  for measuring activity patterns of fishes.
     Water Resources Bull.  4(3):  27-43.

 Sokal, R. R. and F. James Rohlf.  1969.  Biometry. W. H. Freeman
     and  Co.  776 pp.

 Sprague, J. B.  1969.  Measurement of pollutant toxicity to fish I.
     Bioassay methods  for acute toxicity.  Water Research.  3:   793-
     821.

 Sparks, Richard E.  (in prep.).  Using the respiratory and cardiac
     responses of bluegills (Lepomis macrochirus Rafinesque) to
     monitor zinc concentrations in water.

 Spoor, W. A., T. W. Neiheisel, and R. A. Drummond.  1971.  An
     electrode chamber for recording respiratory and other move-
     ments of free-swimming animals.  Trans.  Amer. Fish.  Soc.
     100(1):  22-28.

Train, R. E. (Ed.).  1970.   The First Annual Report of the Council
     on Environmental Quality.  U.S.  Govt. Printing Office.  326  pp.
                                   54

-------
                             SECTION VIII

                             PUBLICATIONS
Sparks, R. E., W. T. Waller, J. Cairns, Jr.  and A.  G. Heath.  1970.
     Diurnal variation in the behavior and physiology of bluegills
     (Lepomis macrochirus Rafinesque). The ASB Bulletin.   17(3):
     90 (Abstract).

Cairns, J., Jr., R. E. Sparks and W. T. Waller.  1971.  The relation-
     ship between continuous biological monitoring  and water  quality
     standards for chronic exposure. American Chemical Society,
     Division of Water, Air and Waste Chemistry. Preprints of
     Papers Presented at the 162nd National Meeting.  11(2):  55-62.

Cairns, J., Jr., R. E. Sparks and W. T. Waller.  1971.  The relation-
     ship between continuous biological monitoring  and water  quality
     standards for chronic exposure. Abstracts of Papers.  162nd
     National Meeting, September 12-17, 1971.  Washington, D. C.
     WATR division, abstract no. 19.

Cairns, J., Jr., R. E. Sparks and W. T. Waller.  1971.   (manuscript
     in press)  The relationship between continuous biological
     monitoring and water quality standards for chronic exposure.

Cairns, J., Jr., R. E. Sparks and W. T. Waller.  1971.   (manuscript
     in press)  The use of fish as sensors in industrial waste lines
     to prevent fish kills.
                                   55

-------
   SELECTED WATER
   RESOURCES ABSTRACTS
   INPUT TRANSACTION FORM
                     1. Report No.
                   2.
   4. Title
     THE USE OF FISH MOVEMENT PATTERNS  TO MONITOR ZINC
   7. Autbor(s)
                Cairns, John, Jr.
                Waller, William T.
   9. Organization

     Virginia Polytechnic Institute  and  State University
     Biology Department and Center for Environmental Studies

  12. Sponsoring Organization

  15. Supplementary Notes
3. Accession No.

w

5. Report Date
6.
8. Performing Organization
   Report No.
10. Project No.
                                         11. Contract I Grant No.
                                            18050 6bp
                                         13. Type of Report and
                                            Period Covered
  16. Abstract    -j^g feasibility of using fish movement patterns measured by light beam
 interruption as a technique for continuous monitoring of the response of fish to zinc
 was investigated. In conjunction with the monitoring studies the  growth and reproductive
 success  of  the Bluegill sunfish (Lepomis macrochirus) exposed  to  various fractions of
 the lowest  concentration of zinc detected by the monitoring apparatus were studied.
 The monitoring apparatus does not  in any way interfere with fish  movement within the
 test chamber and allows for the maintenance of fish for long time periods. Under the
 conditions  described the system detects premortal aberrations  in  fish movement caused
 by zinc.  The detection of stress occurs in sufficient time to  permit survival of the
 test fish if stress conditions are reversed at the time of detection. The lowest
 concentration of zinc detected by  the system during a 96-hour  exposure was between
 3.64 and 2.94 mg/1 Zri*"1". The system's range of effective measurement as related to
 turbidity is discussed. This method should detect other toxicity  equally well. The
 growth and  reproductive success of the bluegill was tested in  concentrations
 approximately equal to 1/10 and 1/100 the lowest concentration of zinc detected by
 the monitoring system and 1/100 of the 96 hour TL50 (median tolerance limit) determined
 under continuous flow conditions.  The growth and reproductive  success in 1/100 the
 lowest detected zinc concentration and 1/100 the 96 hour TL50  value did not differ
 appreciably from the controls while a concentration of approximately 1/10 the lowest
           vine- f*rmrf*nl"rat-i nn "in pf-Fprt" pin tninafpfl rppTndiir t"i nn  in  the bluegill. _
  17 a. Descriptors

     *Water pollution control, industrial wastes , *Bioindicators , Fishkill, Fish
      physiology
  776. Identifiers
     *Biological monitoring, Bluegill, Zinc, Lepomis macrochirus Rafinesque
  17c. COWRR Field & Croup    Q5G  Q5C
  18. Availability
19. Security Class.
   (Report)

20. Security Class.
   (Page)
  Abstractor
    21. No. of
       Pages

    22. Price

Institution
                                                        Send To:
                                                       WATER RESOURCES SCIENTIFIC INFORMATION CENTER
                                                       U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
                                                       WASHINGTON. D. C. 2O24O
WRSIC 102 (REV. JUNE 1971)
                                                                                  CPO 913.261

-------