EPA-600/2-75-057
October 1975
Environmental Protection Technology Series
            THE  MAGNESIA
                    PROCESS  AS
                             PLAUT
                                                   Iisiareli Laboritffry
                                           Offic® :• jf Hesearcfc and Develipment
                                           U.S. EnviroimiBgrtal Protecfioi Agency
                                       Research Triable Park. N.C. 27711

-------
                  RESEARCH REPORTING  SERIES
Research reports of the Office  of  Research and Development,
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,  have been grouped into
five series.  These five broad  categories  were established to
facilitate further development  and application of environmental
technology.  Elimination of traditional  grouping was consciously
planned to foster technology transfer  and  a maximum interface in
related fields.  The five series are:

          1.  Environmental Health Effects Research
          2.  Environmental Protection Technology
          3.  Ecological Research
          4.  Environmental Monitoring
          5.  Socioeconomic Environmental  Studies

This report has been assigned to the ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
TECHNOLOGY series.  This series describes  research performed
to develop and demonstrate instrumentation,  equipment and
methodology to repair or prevent environmental degradation from
point and non-point sources of  pollution.   This work provides the
new or improved technology required for  the control and treatment
of pollution sources to meet environmental quality standards.

                      EPA REVIEW NOTICE

This report has been reviewed by the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, and approved for publication.  Approval  does not signify that
the contents necessarily reflect the views and policies of the Agency, nor
does mention of trade names or commercial  products constitute endorse-
ment or recommendation for use.
This document is available to the public  through the National
Technical Information Service,  Springfield,  Virginia  22161.

-------
                              EPA-600/2-75-057
THE  MAGNESIA SCRUBBING  PROCESS

            AS APPLIED  TO

    AN OIL-FIRED POWER PLANT
   George Koehler (Chemical Construction) and
        James A. Burns (Boston Edison)

       Chemical Construction Corporation
               One Penn Plaza
             New York, NY  10001
           Contract No. CPA 70-114
             ROAPNo. 21ADA-004
         Program Element No. 1AB013


      EPA Project Officer: C. J. Chatlynne

  Industrial Environmental Research Laboratory
    Office of Energy, Minerals, and Industry
      Research Triangle Park, NC  27711


                Prepared for

 U.S.  ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
      Office of Research and Development
            Washington,  DC 20460


                October  1975

-------
ABSTRACT
.A  full size demonstration of the magnesia wet-scrubbing
system for Flue Gas Desulfurization was conducted on an
oil  fired, 150 MW generating unit.  The project involved,
first, design and construction of an S02 removal system
based on firing 2.5% sulfur fuel and an MgO regeneration
facility for 50 ton/day acid production, arid then operation
of both plants over a two year period.  Four thousand hours
of operation were logged at the generating station and the
ability of the system to remove 90% of the inlet S02 and
control particulate emissions was shown.  Regenerated
magnesia was recycled successfully and over 5,000 tons
of acid were marketed from the regeneration plant demon-
strating the feasibility of the process,  correlations
were developed to determine SC>2 removal for varying boiler
loads and fuel sulfur content, and to control regeneration
of acceptable alkali.  Several other studies of the process
technology and process chemistry were undertaken as part
of the work.
                          - 111-

-------
INDEX
Page
i.o







2.0
3.0








4.0














5.0
Summary
1.1
1.2

1.3


1.4
Boston Edison SC>2 Recovery System
Essex Chemical - MgO Regeneration
and Sulfuric Acid Production
MgO Losses
1.3.1 Boston Edison
1.3.2 Essex Chemical
General
Background & Introduction
General Process Description
3.1


3.2




Description of Plants
3.1.1 Power Plant
3.1.2 Acid Plant
Description of Installed Facilities
3.2.1. Magnesia SC-2 Absorption
System
3.2.2 Magnesia Regeneration System
3.2.3 Acid Plant Modifications
Description of Work Performed
4.1





4.2





4.3
4.4
SC-2 Absorption Facility Operations
4.1.1 End of Construction Phase
4.1.2 Pre-Start Up Period
4.1.3 Start-up & Break-in Period
4.1.4 Planned Operational Tests
4.1.5 Operational Testing
Regeneration-Recovery Operations
4.2.1 End of Construction Phase
4.2.2 Pre-Start Up Period
4.2.3 Start-Up & Shake-Down Period
4.2.4 Planned Operations Tests
4.2.5 Operational Testing
Summary of System Modifications
System Availability
1
3

9
11
11
11
12
13
19
24
24
28
30

31
36
42
48
48
48
50
53
58
64
66
66
67
68
71
76
77
82
Equipment Arrangement & Material of
Construction


5.1

Absorber System Areas Subject to
Corrosive Attack
87

96
    - IV -

-------
                          INDEX
       5.2   Centrifuge System
       5.3   Stack
       5.4   Regeneration System
       5.5   Corrosion Samples

 6.0   Process Chemistry                         119
       6.1   Effect of MgO Properties on Process 120
             6.1.1   Pulverization               121
             6.1.2   Hydration of MgO            122
       6.2   System pH & S02 Absorption          122
             6.2.1   S02 Absorption              127
       6.3   Centrifugation & Solids Separation  132
       6.4   Regeneration Mechanisms             132
             6.4.1   Magnesium Sulfate Control   139
             6.4.2   Magnesia Activity Control   141
       6.5   MgO Losses & Regeneration Cycles    141

 7.0   Description of Test & Development Program. 146
       7.1   Test Program                        147
             7.1.1   Start Up & Break In Tests   147
             7.1.2   Variables Screening Tests   147
             7.1.3   Long Term Tests             148
       7.2   Statistical Methods                 148

 8.0   Performance Test Results                  154

 9.0   Data                                      159
       9.1   Operating Information               160
       9.2   Range of Significant Variables      169
       9.3   Miscellaneous Data                  197

10.0   Financial Data                            202
       10.1  Systems Cost                        204
       10.2  Operating Costs                     206
       10.3  Process Economics                   206

11.0   References                                216

12.0   List of  Publications                       217

13.0   Conversion From English  to Metric  Units    219
                             - v -

-------
                           INDEX
                                                 Page
 Appendix A - Magnesium Sulfite Hydrates -
               Transition & Formation             220

 Appendix B - Physico - Chemical Data             227

 Appendix C - Analytical Techniques               236


                          FIGURES

 1      S(>2 Removal Efficiency-Effect of A P        4
 2      'Effect of pH on SC>2 Outlet Concentration    5
 3      Calciner - Effect of Mid Kiln Temperature
         on Bulk Density                           10
 4      Fossil Fuel Steam Generating Unit Life
         .Curve  .                                   15
 5      Chemico-Basic Magnesia F.G.D. System -
         Schematic Flow Diagram                    20
 6      Sectional View of Absorber                 21
 7      Mystic #6 Boiler Cross Section             26
 8      Damper Location & Ducts F.G.D. System      27
 9      Process Flow Diagram-Absorber & Centrifuge
         Systems                                   32
10      Process Flow Diagram Drying System         38
11      Process Flow Diagram Calcining System      40
12      Sulfuric Acid Plant Schematic              44
13      Process Flow Diagram Tail Gas Scrubber     46
14      Project Schedule                           49
15      F.G.Do System Operating Periods & Outages
         Jan.  1974 - June 1974                     85
16      General Arrangement Plan F0G.D. System     88
17      General Arrangement Plan Regeneration
         System                                    89
18      Venturi Throat Area Wear                   98
19      Demister Modules                           98
20      Recycle Pump Impeller Wear                 99
21      Recycle Pipe-Upper Section                101
22      "T" Section of Recycle Line               102
23      Cross  Section of Recycle Pipe             103
24      Microstructure of Recycle Pipe I.D.        105
25      Neutralization Curve                      106
                             - vi -

-------
                         FIGURE
26      Centrifuge Conveyor Wear                  109
27      Centrifuge Conveyor Scale                 109
28      Conveyor Wear Plot                        110
29      S02 Removal Efficiency Effect of A P      130
30      Dispersed Liquid Surface Area             131
31      Effect of System pH and MgSC>4 Level on
         Recycle Solids Content                   133
32      Calciner Operation - Effect of Mid-Kiln
         Temperatures & % Carbon on Bulk Density  140
33      MgO Consumption by Operating Period       142
34      Mystic #6 Daily Load Swing                149
35      Mystic #6 Seasonal Load Swing             150
36      Process Data Flow Diagram                 152
37     ' S02 Removal Efficiency                    170
38      S02 Inlet Concentration                   171
39      S02 Inlet Concentration                   172
40      Boiler Load                               173
41      Absorber A P                              174
42      Absorber Inlet Temperature                175
43      MgO Slurry Temperature                    176
44      Dryer Outlet Temperature                  177
45      Dryer Product Temperature                 178
46      Dryer Product Solids Content              179
47      Dryer Product % MgS03                     180
48      Dryer Product % MgS04                     181
49      Dryer Product % MgO                       186
50      Centrifuge Feed Rate                      183
51      Centrifuge Torque                         184
52      Recycle Slurry Flow                       185
53      Recycle Slurry Temperature                186
54      Recycle Slurry Solids                     187
55      Recycle Slurry MgS04.Content              188
56      Recycle Slurry MgO Content                189
57      Recycle Slurry pH                         190
58      Calciner - Mid-Kiln Temperature           191
59      Calciner Feed Rate                        192
60      Calciner Product - % MgO                  193
61      Calciner Product - % MgS04                194
62      Calciner Product Bulk Density             195
63      Calciner Off-Gas % 02                     196
                           - vn -

-------
                        TABLES

 1       Typical Composition at Major Product
          Streams                                    6
 2       Typical Fuel Oil Analyses                  28
 3       Sulfuric Acid Unit Feed Gas                30
 4       Stream Properties & Composition - Absorber
          & Centrifuge System       .                33
 5       Stream Properties & Composition - Drying
          System                                    39
 6       Stream Properties & Composition - MgO
          Regeneration System                       41
 7       Stream Properties & Composition - Tail
          Gas Scrubber                              47
 8       Absorber Gas Flow                          63
 9       F.G.D. System Availability by Test Program
          Phase                                     83
10       F.G.D. System Availability - June 1973 to
          June 1974                                 84
11       Equipment Performance F.G.D. Systems       90
12       Equipment Performance Regeneration System  93
13       Chloride Analyses                          97
14       Centrifuge Operating Hours                108
15       Stack Drainings Analyses                  112
16       Corrosion Test Data                       115
17       Coated Specimen Test Coupons              117
18       Calciner Product Screen Analyses          123
19       Effect of Temperature of Digestion on S02
          Removal Capacity                         124
20       Rate of Hydration of MgO                  125
21       PK Values of Weak Acids                   126
22       Potential Sources of MgO Losses           143
23       S02 Removal - Performance Test Results    155
24       Particulate Removal-Performance Test
          Results                                  156
25       Particulate Removal by Particle Size
          Performance Test Results                 157
26       Oil Analysis During Performance Tests     158
27       F.G.D. System Operating Conditions        161
28       F.G.D. System Stream Analysis             163
29       Regeneration System Operating Conditions  165
30       Regeneration System Stream Analysis       167
31       Mystic #6 Boiler - Fuel Oil % Sulfur      198
                             - vni  -

-------
                           TABLES
32     High Sulfur Oil Ash Analyses                 200
33     Regenerated MgO - Vanadium &  Nickel
         Content                                   201
34     Summary of Financial Data                   203
35     System Cost Details - F0G0D.  Plant  '         204
36     System Cost Details - Regeneration Plant     205
37     Operating Cost - F.G.D.  Plant               207
38     Operating Cost - Regeneration Plant
         plus Testing & Quality Control
         Program                                   208
39     Project Management Costs                    211
40     Summary of Estimated Final Investment  -
         200 MW Coal-Fired Unit                    214
41     Annual Costs - 98% H2S04 From Power
         Plant Stack Gas - 200  MW Coal-Fired
         Unit                                      215
                               -  ix  -

-------
                  ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors wish to acknowledge the contribution of
Boston Edison Co. and Chemico on-site personnel at the
Mystic Station facility, and also the assistance and
contributions of Essex Chemical Co., Basic Chemicals,
and EPA to this program.

The authors are also indebted to Dr. A. Ray and Mr.
E. Dober who assisted in the preparation of this report
and to Mr. M. A. Maxwell of the Environmental Protection
Agency who contributed greatly to the success of the
project.
                            - x -

-------
                     1.0  SUMMARY
       The control of emissions from fossil fuel fired equipment
 has  long been a matter of national concern.  Of these
 pollutants sulfur dioxide  (S02) produced in the combustion
 of coal and oil at power generating plants represents approxi-
 mately 55% of the S02 discharged annually to the natural
 environment in the United States.

       Acting under the impetus of the Clean Air Act to reduce
 S02 emissions and establish air quality standards several
 methods of control for this pollutant were implemented.
 initially, reduction of S02 levels was accomplished through
 the use of low sulfur fuels.  However, because of their
 limited availability and high costs, the significant impact
 on abatement of S02 emissions is expected to come from flue
 gas desulfurization  (F.G.D0) methods.

       The F.G.D. processes are generally divided into two
 categories:  "throw away" and "regenerable".  In the throw
 away processes, flue gas SC>2 is absorbed, precipitated as a
 sulfur containing solid material and the solid is disposed
 of as a waste material.  In the regenerable processes, the
 S02 is absorbed and subsequently recovered in a usable form
 while the absorbent is regenerated and returned to the F.G.D0
 system.

       One regenerable flue' gas desulfurization process is
 based upon the reaction of magnesium oxide (magnesia) with
 S02, forming magnesium sulfite.  The magnesium sulfite solids
 are separated by centrifugation, dried to remove moisture
 and then calcined to regenerate magnesium oxide for recycle
 and S02 for conversion into sulfuric acid.  Once properly
 conditioned, the SO2 can be used by existing as well as new
 sulfuric acid plants.

       Although laboratory and pilot work had been done by
Chemical Construction Corp.  on the absorption and integrated
plant operation and by Basic Chemicals on the regeneration steps
by 1970 several questions on full-scale application of this
method remained.
                               -1-

-------
      1)  The ability to efficiently remove sulfur
          oxides from the flue gases.

      2)  The ability to continually regenerate a
          reactive magnesium oxide.

      3)  The quality of the product sulfuric acid.

      4).  Mechanical and materials reliability.

      5)  Projected construction and operating costs.

      6)  Transport and storage properties of the
          magnesium sulfite and regenerated magnesium
          oxide.

      In 1970, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and
the Boston Edison Company agreed to provide the funds for
the construction and 2-year operation of a large prototype
sulfur dioxide recovery plant based upon magnesia slurry
scrubbing.  The Chemico-Basic magnesia process was chosen.
The SC>2 absorption plant was installed at Boston Edison's
Mystic Station in Everett, Massachusetts, and the regenera-
tion facility at Essex Chemical's Rumford, Rhode Island,
sulfuric acid plant.  The process was scaled up from a small
pilot plant handling 1,500 cubic feet per minute (CFM) of
gas to a full size unit designed to treat the flue gas
(450,000 ACFM) from a 150 MW generator at the station fired
with high sulfur, No. 6 fuel oil.

      A test plan was developed to answer the questions on
full-scale system performance, and to determine the effects
of the numerous control and stream composition variables
on operability and efficiency of the magnesia slurry method
of S02 control. The goals of the program were achieved and
relationships developed to measure the effect of variations
in system operation on both SC^ removal efficiency and
absorbent regenerability.

      The program spanned a 21 month period for construction
of the plants and a 27 month period of operations dividied
into a preliminary pre-startup and shakedown period, planned
operational testing period and an end period for continuous
                            -2-

-------
running at a stable set of conditions,  in all, over 4,000
hours of running time of the F.G.D. system were logged.

1.1   BOSTON EDISON S02 RECOVERY

      The chemical and mechanical performance of the scrub-
ber  itself was excellent.  None of the internal plugging
problems which plagued the early operations of the lime and
limestone processes were encountered.  The plastic lining of
the scrubber was in sound condition after two years of opera-
tion.  Erosion and corrosion were experienced in the carbon
steel recirculating slurry piping. The use of rubber-lined
pumps, valves, and piping in certain areas of this system is
now considered as the most practical solution to this problem.
The S02 removal efficiency was excellent over a wide range
of operation, even during the last six months of the project
when the S02 control system faced frequent boiler outages.
The results of the performance tests which were conducted by
a third party, York Research, gave as an average (four tests) :

           S02 Removal                         91.7%

           Oil Ash Particulate Matter Removal  57%

      A correlation of S02 removal efficiency as a function
of inlet S02 concentration and pressure drop across the
scrubber was developed based on actual performance data and
the correlation is shown graphically in Figure 1.  in this
same figure, the excellent operability range of the system
is shown by the consistently high removal efficiency curves
for pressure drops above 6 inches of water.

      The major control variables used to regulate the scrub-
bing operation were the recycle slurry pH and percent solids.
The effect of pH on S02 concentration is shown in Figure 2.
The effect was controlled by adjusting the rate of MgO addi-
tion. Typical compositions of the recirculating slurry are
shown in Table 1, along with other key streams.  The amount
of solids in the slurry was controlled by adjusting the rate
of bleed from the recycle slurry.

      The majority of the operating problems experienced at
the power plant installation were closely tied to the solids-
handling system.  Many of these problems were due to the
                             -3-

-------
 D_
 D.
 ar>
LI-
LI-
UJ

_j
era.


z:
LU
cn
CO
                     DP=t2 IM.
                     	36	

                     DP=6 IM.
                     DP»2 IN.
 =500
       nbo
ebo
       sbo
1000   1200    1400   1600
     INLET SQ2 - PPM
1800
2000
  502  REMOVRL....EFFICIENCY
  EFFECT
OF DELTfl  P  flND  INLET
                                   502
                            CONC
                        Fig. 1

-------
 o
 o
  •

 o
 C\J.
 o
 o
2:o
Q_o


•—'0_
en
 o
 o
  •
 o.
 00
 o
 o
 o
 r-,
5.00
5.50
6.00
  EFFECT  OF  PH
   -BOSTON  EDISON
                    6.50    7.00    7.50

                            PH
      ON  302  OUTLET
       JUNE 1973
8.00
8.50
9.00
9.50
                               CONC.CPPM)
                             Fig. 2

-------
               TABLE 1
TYPICAL COMPOSITION OF MAJOR PRODUCT STREAMS


Recycle Slurry*
Centrifuge Cake
Calciner Feed
Calciner Product

MgO
0.3
2.2
7.1
87.1
%Of
MgSO3
6.3
37.8
60.3
0
Total Stream
Mgb04
14.4
6.5
10.9
7.7

Water & Inerts
79.0
53.5
21.7
5.1
* Approximately 10% suspended solids in slurry
                     -6-

-------
nature of the magnesium sulfite crystals obtained from the
scrubber.  Although the easily separated magnesium sulfite
hexahydrate  (MgS03.6H20) crystals produced in the pilot
operations were expected, any sustained operation of the
scrubber resulted in the production of the finer magnesium
sulfite trihydrate (MgSC>3.3H20) crystals.

      This unexpected occurrence resulted in crystal pro-
perties different from those used in the design of the solids-
handling system and the dryer, and was the primary process
problem encountered in the project.  Modifications eventually
were required in all of the process areas handling magnesium
sulfite crystals to allow for operation with large amounts
of the trihydrate present.

      The rotary dryer, used for removing free and bound
water from the centrifuge slurry solids, was found to be at
the center of these initial operating problems.  Since this
dryer was designed for operation with the relatively coarse
hexahydrate crystals, the fine trihydrate crystals caused
excessive dusting, buildup of solids, and loss of drying
ability.  The following modifications led to reliable dryings

      1)  The dryer operation and internal configuration
          were modified to allow the dryer to act as a
          granulator for the fine crystals.

      2)  A scalping screen and lump breakers were
          installed at the dryer discharge to handle
          oversize agglomerated granuales of dried
          magnesium sulfite from the dryer.

      3)  High dust losses from the dryer because of
          the fine crystal size were corrected by piping
          the dryer off-gas to the venturi scrubber.

      4)  Hammers were installed on the dryer shell to
          prevent the build-up of solids.

      5)  The dryer conveyor was lengthened to allow
          wet centrifuge cake to be added at a point
          further into the dryer.
                            -7-

-------
       6)  The mixing of the dry material, removed from
           the cyclone dust collector operating on the
           dryer off-gases, with the wet centrifuge solids.
           created a mixture which would "set up" on the
           screw conveyor.  A pneumatic conveyor system
           was installed to transport this material
           directly to the MgSOo silo.

       As the first regenerated magnesium oxide arrived at
the power plant for reuse, other problems in solids handling
developed. The calcined magnesia returned from the acid plant
contained a fraction of a larger-than-desirable particle size
as well as some overturned MgO particles that would not react
with water to form a reactive slaked slurry.  A pulverizer
was installed to grind this oversized MgO to that which was
usable.  This pulverizer was eventually transferred to the
acid plant.  In addition, magnesium oxide returning from the
acid plant initially showed a lower reactivity than expected.
This was corrected by heating the MgO slurry tank to 180°F
to increase the slaking rate of the MgO.

       The combined effects of corrosion and erosion were
experienced in all pumps, valves, and piping that handled
the scrubbing slurry.  Because the prototype plant was de-
signed for only a two year period of operation,  cast iron
and carbon steel were used in these areas and quickly failed.
Rubber or plastic lining is now considered necessary in
slurry-handling applications.

       While centrifuge performance was generally satisfactory,
improved internal washing techniques were required to reduce
wear and improve reliability.

       The availability of the S02 recovery system to the
Boston Edison Unit No. 6 boiler ranged from a low of 13
percent to a high of 87 percent during the April 1972 and
June 1974 operating periods,respectively.  Many of the lower
value  availabilities were caused by the problems discussed
above.  During the last four month period of the recovery
system's operation, the monthly availabilities were 87 percent,
81 percent, 57 percent and 80 percent.  The lowest reported
value was due to the lack of MgO for S02 removal, caused by
problems in the sulfuric acid plant and an intentional
                             -8-

-------
 emptying  of  the MgO  silos during  a  controlled  system  test.

 1.2   ESSEX CHEMICAL  - MgO REGENERATION AND  SULFURIC ACID
                      PRODUCTION

      After solving several  initial  operating problems, which
 are  discussed  in  the following  paragraphs,  the chemical plant
 was  consistently  able to manufacture high quality  98  percent
 sulfuric  acid, which was sold in  the commercial market.
 Over 5,000 tons of H-SO^ were made  from  captured flue gas
 sulfur.   During this same period, 3,000  tons of magnesium
 oxide were regenerated  and  shipped  to the power plant for
 reuse.

      The  continued ability  of the system to operate effi-
ciently with regenerated magnesium oxide was a major variable
investigated during the project.  The occasional formation of
a small amount of less  reactive MgO was  observed.   This  was
generally accompanied by an increase in density of the magnesia.
Data from this test program were correlated by regression
analysis with operating conditions and the  percentage of car-
bon in the feed to predict operating conditions which would
result in a low-bulk-density magnesia.   This correlation is
shown in Figure 3 and indicates that the formation of low-
bulk-density (high reactivity)  magnesia is  favored by low
calciner temperature and an increased amount of carbon in the
calciner feed.

     Mechanical problems at the chemical plant were centered
around the calciner operation,.   One such problem was air leak-
age into the calciner's firing hood0  The calciner must  operate
at very near neutral or reducing conditions in order to  allow
for the reduction of magnesium sulfate to magnesia.  A con-
siderable amount of effort was expended in tightening up seals
and reducing air leakage.  The problem was  finally solved by
the installation of a friction seal.

     Another problem occurred when oil was  fired during  the
startup of the cold calciner.  Hydrocarbon vapors not removed
by the scrubbing equipment entered the sulfuric acid towers,
which immediately caused blackening of the  acid.  This problem
was solved by installing a fan and a short stack,  which  allow-
ed the startup vapors to bypass the sulfuric acid plant.
                            -9-

-------
 V-.
 WJ_
 n
CO
^
LU
_,
<—'
CD
 D.
 nj
O
I
 O.
                                              =2. 0
  700
800
900
1000
II 00
1200
1300
1400
                        M1DKILN TEMP-DEG F
  CRLCINER  OPERRTIGN  -  EFFECT
  MIDKILN  TEMP.  & 7.C. ON BULK  DENSITY
  1500

 OF '
Fig. 3
1600
1700

-------
This system was used only when heating up the calciner and
was never operated during periods of S02 generation.

1.3  MgO LOSSES

     During the early period of operation, magnesium oxide
losses were excessive due primarily to spills and required
cleanouts caused, as previously described, by the solids-
handling problems.

1.3.1  Boston Edison
     In the  final four months of operation, however, the
bulk of these problems were solved and a careful measure-
ment was made of system losses.  During these four months,
1,500,000 Pounds of regenerated material were recycled to
the power plant as scrubber slurry makeup.  A 13-day test
to identify  each specific loss point was also conducted.
The measurements showed a loss over the entire power plant
operation of 0.37 ton per operating day, distributed as
follows :

     Loss to stack             0.13 ton per day

     Scrubber overflow         0.14 ton per day

     Miscellaneous             0.10 ton per day

     Total                     0.37 ton per day

     With an average MgO consumption of 10.61 tons per day
during this  period, this total loss amounted to 3.5 percent
of MgO consumption at the power plant.  The design loss at
this same location was predicted to be 5 percent.

1.302  Essex Chemical

     The greatest losses for this project occurred at the re-
generation plant in Rumford, where 0.5 ton per day was scalped
off the calciner product as large lumps before the pulveriza-
tion process. Future system design will provide for the re-
claiming of  these losses.  In addition, 1.5 tons per day
were lost from the neutralizer overflow.  In subsequent
designs, this large loss can be recovered for recycle by
separation of solids in the neutralizer overflow.  Thus,
                            -11-

-------
almost all of the regeneration plant losses can be reclaimed
by improved design at new regeneration plants.

1.4  GENERAL

     Operation of the full size plant yielded much valuable
information for the design of future plants.  During the
course of this project:
                *
     1)  Studies of the complex physico-chemistry of the
process were undertaken yielding data not previously re-
ported on:

         a)  The kinetics of the MgSC>3 hydrate formation
and transformation.

         b)  The activation phenomena of regenerated MgO
slaking.

         c)  The formation and influence of MgSC>4 in the
system.

     2)  Measurements were made of the physical properties
of the chemical components of the system.

     3)  New analytical methods and techniques were
developed to assure process and quality control at the
plants.

     4)  Observation and testing of the suitability of
the equipment and materials of construction yielded new
recommendations for the design of improved plants.

     Finally,  the accumulation of operating experience and
a large data bank for reference allowed initiation of the
second phase of the overall application of the magnesia
slurry system for S02 control at a coal fired generating
station.

* Work in these areas is still ongoing.
                           -12-

-------
              2.0  BACKGROUND AND INTRODUCTION
     The control of sulfur oxides emitted to the atmosphere
from power plants has become increasingly important in
recent years.  The deleterious effect on human health and
the environment of these substances has been well documen-
ted and needs no review here.  The growing demand for energy
has compounded the problems of pollution abatement.  For
example, total S02 emissions in 1965 were estimated at 25
million tons per year, and it was anticipated that, if no
controls were imposed, these emissions would rise to 75
million tons per year in the United States by 1975.  Of this
amount, two thirds would originate from the products of com-
bustion of fossil fuel fired power stations.

     The national concern for this and other problems
related to air pollution was reflected by the Congress ini-
tially in the authorization of a Federal program of research
for air pollution control in 1955, the later adoption of the
Clean Air Act of 1963, and finally the Air Quality Acts of
1967 and 1970.  All of these acts focused attention on the
environmental problems created by the conversion of fossil
fuels to energy for heat and power.  Also reacting to these
problems, the utilities and chemical industries instituted
numerous programs and studies for environmental protection,
many industries having installed pollution abatement equip-
ment decades before the enactment of the specific legisla-
tion.

     Chemico, a leader in the field of the design and con-
struction of air pollution control equipment and in the
incorporation of environmental protection provisions in the
chemical plants which it also designs and constructs, drew
on its 27 years experience in particulate emissions control
and initiated several in-house studies in means of SO2
control from large boilers.  By 1966 these Chemico marketing
studies indicated that the New England area would become a
high cost area for fuel oil and that low sulfur content
then proposed as the solution for S0_ emissions, would
itself have the highest cost impact.  Engineering studies
had also revealed that alternative schemes for S02 control
which produced waste products were unacceptable in the New
                              -13-

-------
England area due to the lack of disposal sites.  Evaluating
this information, laboratory studies were initiated on
methods of controlling emissions by the use of a regenerable
process.  These studies demonstrated that a process built on
the use of magnesia appeared to be the most practical.  In
addition, the magnesia system provided a means of incorpora-
ting the concept of a separate, self-contained, central
regeneration plant to serve many power plants.  This chemical
plant could then be sized economically for the recovery of
sulfur values, and the design could be based on the longer,
full production capabilities of such plants, rather than the
dimishing power production (Fig.4) experienced in modern
generating stations.

     An incentive for rapidly proceeding to full scale plant
operations of the magnesia process, by-passing the smaller
scale semi-works units normally employed in scale-up,  was
provided by the Panel on Control of Sulfur Dioxide from
Stationary Combustion Sources.  This panel, a committee of
the National Research Council and the National Academy of
Engineering, had recommended funding of prototype facilities
in order to speed the demonstration of the necessary pollu-
tion abatement systems.

     The arrangements for funding the magnesia system proto-
type were concluded in a master contract signed in June,1970.
In it the United States Environmental Protection Agency and
Boston Edison Company agreed to provide the funds for a large
prototype system using the Chemico-Basic MgO Sulfur Recovery
Process for control of SC>2 emissions from power plants.

Capital funds for the absorption system to be installed at
the power plant were provided by the Boston Edison Company,
while E.P.A. furnished funds for the magnesium oxide regen-
eration system to be installed at a small sulfuric acid plant
located in Rumford, R.I.,owned by Essex Chemical Company,as
well as the acid plant modifications necessary to accommodate
a "roaster gas" process.  Operation and maintenance of the
facilities were the responsibility of Essex  Chemical Company
and Boston Edison Company respectively, with reimbursement of
these costs by E.P.A.  However, Boston Edison's reimbursement
was limited by a ceiling.   Chemico was responsible for
Project Management of the total project, with a part of the
                              -14-

-------
                 FIG.4-THE EFFECT OF LOAD FACTOR
                       UPON S02 RECOVERY REVENUE
  100
  80%
en
I
  60%-
  40%
  20%-
   DECLINING LOAD FACTOR CURVE
            OR
       PRODUCT  RECOVERY
         REVENUE  CURVE
                 10
15
20
25
30
35
         FOSSIL FUEL STEAM GENERATING UNIT LIFE- YEARS

-------
cost reimbursed by E.P.A.

     A history of these and the subsequent events  which  led
to the full scale demonstration of the magnesia process  on a
utility boiler is summarized below:
          NEW ENGLAND S02 CONTROL PROJECT HISTORY
          1966  -  Chemico studies showed New England would
                   become a high fuel oil cost area.

          1966  -  Boston Edison was investigating  alterna-
                   tives to the use of low sulfur fuel.

          1967  -  Laboratory studies of 502  removal/regen-
                   eration schemes were initiated by  Chemica

          1967  -  Chemico and Boston Edison  Co.  discussed
                   testing of these schemes at a  Boston
                   Edison Co. generating station.

          1968  -  Pilot plant studies of the magnesia system
                   at generating stations were undertaken  by
                   Chemico.

          1969  -  Chemico and the Environmental  Protection
                   Agency discussed mutual funding  and par-
                   ticipation in a demonstration  project.
          1970  -  1)
The master contract, creating the
New England SO- Control Project was
signed by Chemico, Boston Edison Co.,
and E.P.A.
                   2)   Chemico entered into agreements with
                       Boston Edison Co.  for the  design  and
                       erection of a magnesia system in  their
                       Mystic #6 boiler.

                   3)   Chemico and Essex  Chemical Co. entered
                       an agreement whereby the regeneration
                               -16-

-------
                       section of the magnesia system would
                       be erected at their  Rumford,  R.I.
                       sulfuric acid plant,  and the recovered
                       S02 would be processed into sulfuric
                       acid.

                   4)  Chemico completed process and design
                       engineering for both  plants.

          1971  -  Construction of both plants started.

          1972  -  Construction of both plants completed.

          1972  -  Initiation of the start-up phase of the
                   New England SC>2 Control Project Test and
                   Development Program.

          1973  -  Initiation of the Planned Operational
                   testing phase of the program.

          1974  -  Completion of the program.
     This report covers the period from January 1st,  1972
thru the end of the project on June 30th,  1974.  During the
first few months of this period, construction at Mystic
Station was completed.  This completion had been delayed from
the original forecast date of October 1971 to April 1972 be-
cause of a combination of cold weather, competing maintenance
projects at the same station, and a lower productivity in the
area than had been predicted.

     During the following two year period, the operations and
test work was conducted, again with an altered schedule.

     The pre start-up period originally scheduled for two
weeks was extended to three months as methods were developed
to cope with the different hydrate and crystal size of mag-
nesium sulfite which was produced in the continuous operation,
as this material had not been encountered in the previous
intermittent pilot plant operation.  The Start-up Shakedown
Phase scheduled for a three to six month period was not com-
pleted till the end of April 1973 because of the step-wise
                              -17-

-------
system necessary to solve the numerous operational, mech-
anical and materials handling problems that arose as the
work progressed.

     The planned operational test period was shortened and
concluded by February of 1974.  At this time, performance
tests were run on the system, and these demonstrated satis-
factory compliance with guarantees.  After the performance
tests were completed, the period from March 1974 to the ter-
mination of the project was devoted to longer and steadier
operational periods at both plants.

     Description of the work performed in the previous period
during most of the construction phase, complete engineering
designs of the system, and extensive descriptions of the oper-
ational programs, have been presented in the following
reports:

     1)   Detailed Engineering Report
          Contract CPA 70-114; Chemico Job 1857G

     2)   Detailed Engineering Report
          Contract CPA 70-114; Chemico Job 1858G

     3)   Report for the period 7/1/70 thru 1/1/72
          Contract CPA 70-114

     4)   Test and Development Program
          150 MW Prototype Venturi Scrubbing System

     5)   Planned Operational Test for New England SC>2
          Control Project
                              -18-

-------
              3.0  GENERAL PROCESS DESCRIPTION
     Chemico/Basic's Magnesium Oxide System for the recovery
of sulfur dioxide from power plant flue gases is shown sche-
matically in Figure 5.  This process, which utilizes the
sulfur dioxide absorption characteristics of an aqueous
slurry of magnesium sulfite, magnesium sulfate, and magnes'-
ium oxide, is composed of five primary steps, these are:

                   Absorption
                   Centrifuging
                   Drying
                   Materials Handling
                   Calcination

a) Absorption

     The process chemistry which describes the removal of
   S02 from the flue gas can be most simply explained as the
   diffusion of SO2 through the flue gas to a liquid surface,
   absorption of the SO2 gas in the liquid and the subse-
   quent reaction of S02 with the hydrated form of MgO, i.e.

                   M9°(aq)  +  S02  	*~ M9S03     (3-D

     The MgSOg produced has a low solubility and can be
   separated from the absorbing slurry as a solid.

     In the process the flue gas containing sulfur oxides
   enters a venturi absorber (Figure 6) of special design,
   and contacts the absorbing media which is an aqueous
   slurry of magnesium oxide, magnesium sulfite, magnesium
   sulfate, and a small percentage'of other components
   including fly ash from the fuel oil.  The process of S0_
   removal that occurs is explaned by conventional mass
   transfer principles.

     The venturi absorber can be considered as similar to a
   co-current, packed vessel.  In the venturi the liquid
   slurry is introduced and flows downward on surfaces over
   which pass an accelerating gas stream.  The high velocity
   gas stream flowing over the liquid causes wave motion on
                              -19-

-------
                               MgO ADDITIVE
                     SCRUBBER SYSTEM FOR S02 RECOVERY
                              OIL FIRED BOILER
                          SCHEMATIC PROCESS FLOW SHEET
       MjO FROM ACID PLANT
                        REGENERATION SYSTEM
           MgO RECYCLE PROCESS, FOR PRODUCTION OF 98% SULFURIC ACID
                     SCHEMATIC PROCESS FLOW SHEET
                                                                         ACID PLANT
                                    SO2  GAS CLEANING
                                                      CONCENTRATED SO2 GAS
                                                        SULFURIC ACID PLANT
                                                                      CONVEYOR
CONVEYOR
                               POWER PLANTS              ~~    ""~.   ©MEMICO
  Magnesia Flue  Gas Desulfurization and Regeneration .system
                       Schematic Flow Diagram

                                 Fig.  5
                                    -20-

-------
                                   ANNULUS
                                   SPRAYS
            TANGENTIAL
               WASH
           CLEAN GAS
            OUTLET
    TO STACK
INTERMITTENT
   MIST
 ELIMINATOR
  SPRAYS
                                                                                    CONE
                                                                                    WASH
                                         — NORMAL LIQUOR LEVEL
                                                          PUMP
                                                         SUCTION
                             Sectional view of absorber at Boston Edison Company, Boston. Mass.

                       FIG.  6                    -21-

-------
   the fluid surface, the waves increase in amplitude and
   finally disperse as fine droplets.  Thus, the whole mass
   of liquid can be distributed in the form of atomized drop-
   lets in the gas stream.  In the process described in this
   report, the dispersed droplets generally have a median
   size of 400 micrometers and the surface area available for
   mass transfer averages 13 ft^ per ft^ of gas.

     There are several advantages in using the venturi as an
   absorber:  The absorption surface is dispersed into and
   flows with the gas stream during the time absorption is
   occurring, thus eliminating the problems of plugging asso-
   ciated  with conventional packed towers  (the surface area
   per unit volume is approximately equivalent to dumped 3
   inch rachig rings).  Due to system dynamics, this surface
   area relation is relatively invarient over wide turn-down
   ratios, and high removal efficiencies can be maintained
   over the normal operating range of the power plant's
   boiler.

     A prediction of system efficiency can be obtained with
   a fair degree of accuracy by assuming a pure diffusion
   phenomena and conventional mass transfer relations.  Using
   this as an estimate, a maximum efficiency of 96% is poss-
   ible for a single stage system.  Deviations from that
   removal efficiency in the demonstration plant and primarily
   caused by equilibrium partial pressures of S02 over the
   droplet surfaces greater than zero in the dynamic system.

b) Centrifuging

     A stream from the absorption system enters the centri-
   fuge where the solids which were formed by the absorption
   reaction in the slurry are separated.  This bleed stream
   is controlled in order to maintain a constant solids con-
   tent in the recycle slurry by removal of product magnesium
   sulfite and unreacted magnesium oxide and any precipitated
   magnesium sulfate.  The system is operated so that the
   absorbed SC^ is removed as an equivalent amount of the
   magnesium sulfur compounds.
                              -22-

-------
c) Dryer System                          ,

     The wet centrifuge cake containing hydrated magnesium
   sulfite, magnesium oxide and magnesium sulfate plus other
   solids removed in the venturi absorber-centrifuge system
   is passed to a rotary dryer to remove both unbound water
   and most of the water of crystallization.   The dry pro-
   duct is easy to store, and the removal of water reduces
   shipping costs.                •

d) Materials Handling

     The anhydrous magnesium sulfite and magnesium sulfate
   produced in the dryer is conveyed to a storage silo for
   transportation by truck to the recovery acid plant.  The
   same transportation equipment is used to return regener-
   ated magnesia to the magnesium oxide silo at the power
   plant on the return trip.  Recycled alkali absorbant from
   the magnesium oxide silo and make-up magnesium oxide are
   fed to an agitated tank with water where a slurry is pre-
   pared for introduction to the recycle system manually on
   pH control.

e) Calcination System

     Calcination is the process for the regeneration, which
   is the reverse of the absorption step.  The magnesium
   sulfite which has been separated and dried is thermally
   decomposed as represented by the following reaction:

                   MgS03 	>-   MgO + S02     (3-2)
                            heat

     The recovered SO2 is used in the production of sulfuric
   acid and the regenerated MgO returned to the process for
   reuse.  The dry product transported to the regeneration
   acid plant from the power plant is received, weighed and
   pneumatically conveyed to a storage silo.   It is fed to a
   direct-fired rotary kiln at a metered rate, and calcined
   to both generate sulfur dioxide gas and regenerate magne-
   sium oxide.  Coke can be added to provide  a reducing
   atmosphere, -as necessary, to reduce the residual magne-
   sium sulfate to the oxide and sulfur dioxide.  The hot
                            -23-

-------
   flue gas containing sulfur dioxide and dust enters a hot
   cyclone where essentially all the dust is removed and
   returned to the calciner.  The flue gas then enters a ven-
   turi scrubber for final dust cleaning.  At the same time,
   the gas is cooled arid adiabatically saturated.

     The saturated flue gas is cooled in a direct contact
   cooler to meet the requirements of the acid plant water
   balance.  The cleaned, cooled flue gas then enters .the
   drying tower of an existing 50T/D acid plant.  At the
   Essex Chemicals installation, the resultant product made
   from the recovery of the sulfur dioxide is 98% sulfuric
   acid.              •                           .

     The regenerated magnesia is cooled,  conveyed to the mag-
   nesia storage silo and recycled back to the power plant.
3.1  DESCRIPTION OF INSTALLATIONS

     The magnesia method of flue gas desulfurization removes
S02 from the products of combustion of fossil-fuel fired
eqiupment by absorption in a slurry containing the alkaline
material, magnesium oxide.  In subsequent steps the S02 is
driven off by a thermal decomposition of the solid products
of absorption regenerating the magnesia for reuse.  Varia-
tions in the process can be used to obtain a range of
strengths of S02 in the gas from the thermal decomposition so
that the products of the recovery operation can vary from
elemental sulfur or sulfur dioxide to sulfuric acid.  In the
work described in this report the flue gas to be treated came
from an oil fired power boiler of an electric generating sta-
tion, and the sulfur dioxide was recovered as sulfuric acid at
a remote sulfuric acid plant.  The power station and the acid
plant are described in the following sections.

3.1.1.  Power Plant

     The flue gas desulfurization system was installed at the
Mystic Station of the Boston Edison Company.  Mystic Station
is located in Everett, Mass, on a 42 acre site on the north
bank of the Mystic River.  The station currently includes six
fossil-fuel steam electric generating units with a total
                             -24-

-------
generating capacity of 618 MW and a seventh unit,  under con-
struction, with a capacity of 600 MW.  The existing 618 MW
capacity is provided by three 50 MW units and three 156 MW
units.  Flue gas from the three 50 MW units is dispersed
through two stacks 278 feet high and the three 156 MW units
have individual stacks 335 feet high.  The units were con-
structed between 1943 and 1961, the last unit (No.6) begin-
ning commercial operation in May 1961.  All units were
initially designed for coal firing and were equipped with
electrostatic precipitators for that fuel.  The station was
completely converted to oil firing by 1966, and the precip-
itators were deenergized because of the inefficiency of
particulate removal resulting from the change.

     The magnesia system was installed on Unit No. 6 at the
station.  This generator is powered by a Combustion Engineer-
ing  controlled  circulation tangentially fired boiler (Fig.
7).  This boiler has a rating of 1,000,000 Ib /hr  of steam
at 1800 PSIG and 1000°F with reheat to 1000°F.

     New ducting was installed at the stack breaching with
dampers in the breaching to divert the flue gas from the
stack to the scrubber system fans; the treated flue gas then
passed back to the stack through a new breaching,  also
equipped with a damper (Fig.8).  During most of the period
of performance when the scrubber was operated it treated all
of the flue gas  (about 40% over design flow at full boiler
loads) which was diverted by fully closing the stack inlet
dampers.  During the last three months of operation, the
damper arrangement allowed the excess flue gas to be by-
passed directly to the stack allowing the scrubber to oper-
ate closer to its design capacity and providing reheat to
the combined stack gas.

     The fuel oil which was burned at Mystic Station in
boilers 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 had a maximum of 0.5% sulfur as
required by Massachusetts Law.  For the purposes of the Test
and Development program,  a special variance was obtained on
October 20, 1970 permitting the use of higher sulfur oil in
the No. 6 unit during the periods of scrubber operation.  A
typical analysis of the higher sulfur oil used during scrub-
ber operating is shown in Table. 2.
                             -25-

-------
                      FIG.   7
         C-E CONTROLLED CIRCULATION BOILER
CAPACItY-.935.000 IB PER MR AI I94O PSI AND IOOO I 1IMP. - RCHEAT IO 1000 F
     D,'i,g,.-..d and Buitt By COMBUSTION ENGINHRINC INC.. New »ock

            1 M^s:!C  STATION-UNITS 445*6
            Boston Ediion Coivpnny  Evcr»M  Mass.
               Jft f.Kr.ON A MOP;: A NO •'••,< - .I-..," fr,. npf,.,

-------
TWO EXISTING
  ID TANS
E-XISTING
 STACK
TWO NEW
F.D FANS
VENTURl
ABSORBER
                                                   SECTION 'A-A'
                                                      FIG. 8
                                 DAMPER LOCATION & DUCTS
                    FLUE GAS DESULFURIZATION SYSTEM
                                    MYSTIC  6 STATION OF
                                          BOSTON EDISON CO.
                                                                                                           MqO STORAGE
                                                                                                           ay.
                                                                                                              SILO
JtlgO SLURRY
   TANK
                                                                                                               TRUCKS

-------
                          TABLE 2

                  TYPICAL FUEL OIL ANALYSIS


                   Sulfur             2.05%

                   Ash                 .07%

                   Carbon            84.39

                   Hydrogen          11.39

                   Nitrogen            .10

                   Oxygen             2.00

                   BTU/lb.          18,350
3.1.2  Acid Plant

     The regeneration system was installed at the Rumford
acid plant of Essex Chemical Company located in Rumford,RI.
The Rumford plant is located 55 miles from the installation
at Mystic Station and haulage of the dryer and calciner pro-
ducts between these two sites was done by truck.  Both
plants were equipped to load their respective products from
elevated silos and receive their feed by pneumatic unloading.
Freight rates for this haulage were established at 21 cent-.s/
cwt on a round trip basis and 35 cents/cwt for one way
transport.

     The plant has been producing sulfuric acid since 1929
when it was build,by Chemical Construction Corporation, and
                             -28-

-------
for the past several years all acid produced was sold in
the merchant market with no captive use.  Markets for the
acid made at this plant are manufacture of detergents, dye-
stuffs, Pharmaceuticals, aluminum sulfate, and tanning
chemicals, steel pickling, boiler water treatment,  lead-acid
batteries, galvanization, etc.  Sales in this market were at
the full.published price, at the time of this program, ap-
proximately $46 per ton based on 100% H-SO^.  No change in
use or pricing was imposed when marketing the acid produced
from MgO regeneration.

     The plant is a contact sulfuric acid plant which uses
sulfur as raw material.  In the  Chemico process the molten
sulfur is injected into the furnace using a spray burner,
with the process air first dried in a tower against 93%
sulfuric acid. The catalyst is vanadium pentoxide.

     When first built in 1928 the Rumford plant was an in-
door plant typical of its time and had a capacity of about
20 tons per day of 100% sulfuric acid.  Substantial modifi-
cations were made to the plant in 1948 by Chemico to in-
crease its capacity to 50 tons per day.  The modifications
included improved converters, a converter heat exchanger,
waste heat boiler and economizer all installed outdoors.
In addition, the cast iron cooling section was enlarged and
moved outside.

     This was the plant that was modified in 1971 to accept
the calciner off gas essentially converting it to a metal-
lurgical  (roaster) gas plant; however, in the modification
the capability to continue to burn sulfur and augment the
SC>2 from the regeneration plant was retained.

     Typical feed gas analyses to the acid unit are shown in
the following table.
                               -29-

-------
                          TABLE 3

                SULFURIC ACID UNIT FEED GAS

                    COMPOSITION, MOLE %

Source of Gas         N_   C02  P_2   H2p_  S_0_2

Regeneration Section  73    6    5    7    9

Sulfur Burning        79        12         9


3.2  DESCRIPTION OF INSTALLED FACILITIES

     The pollution abatement facility, comprising the ab-
sorption, centrifuging and drying section is installed on
the #6 boiler of the Mystic Station, while the regenera-
tion plant  (calcining section) is installed at the acid
plant, located approximately 50 miles away.  By performing
the drying step at the generating station unbound water and
water of crystallization are removed from the solid prior to
transportation in order to reduce shipping costs.

     Transportation of MgSO^ and regenerated MgO between the
two sites was handled by conventional pneumatic discharge
hopper trucks.  Originally two 825 ft  units were in service;
however, this was eventually reduced to one 1200 ft  trailer
hauling MgO from the regeneration facility and MgS03 on the
return trip.  The tractor used had a self-contained blower
for unloading material;  an auxiliary compressor was avail-
able at the calcining facility to allow the trailer to be
dropped completely if necessary.  This compressor was also
used to unload coke brought to the regeneration facility in
a PD  (Pneumatic Discharge) hopper rail car which was leased
for this service.

     During periods of extended operation of the plants,  the
single trailer was unable to transport all the MgSO  pro-
duced.  In order to move the additional material necessary
for uninterrupted plant operations,  a local chemical truck-
ing company provided additional units for the service.  In
addition, make-up MgO shipped by rail was transferred to
                             -30-

-------
this same company's trucks for delivery to the power plant.

     All silos, materials handling, and transport systems
were designed on the '.basis of the bulk densities of MgO and
MgSO3 determined in preceding pilot plant work, those were
25 Ib/ft^ and 50 Ib/ft^ respectively.  The storage facilities
at both sites were sized to ensure that they were adequate
for continued operation in the event of up to a five day in-
terruption in shipments.  This duration was chosen after an
evaluation of information from the Department of Transporta-
tion of both states regarding the frequency and probability
of interruptions due to weather and other circumstances.
Most development work on the chemistry of the process, in-
cluding new analytical  techniques, was conducted by Chemico
personnel in a laboratory facility located at the acid plant;
these chemists and technicians also performed the chemical
analysis for stream assay and quality control.

3.2.1  Magnesia SC>2 Absorption System

     The SC>2 Absorption System Flow Sheet is shown in Fig.9.
In this system magnesia, both regenerated and make-up mat-
erial, is transferred from pneumatic discharge hopper trucks
to the elevated MgO storage bin through a 4 in pneumatic
unloading system.  The MgO bin,  1-101, is 35 ft in diameter
and 42 ft high.  Magnesia is fed from the silo, which is
equipped with a vibrating hopper bottom, 0-102, to a 16,000
gallon capicity MgO make-up tank G-102 by an adjustable weigh
feeder, 0-103, with ratio control of make-up water to make
the desired MgO slurry composition.  A small pre-mix tank is
interposed between the weighing system and the steam heated
make-up tank to act as a vapor seal.  Heated magnesia slurry
is added to the recycle stream by the MgO make-up pump J-101.
The magnesia slurry addition rate is controlled by the oper-
ator to maintain the pH of the absorbing slurry at the de-
sired value.

     The recycle stream for the absorber is circulated at a
rate of 14,000 to 15,000 GPM to provide a slurry dispersion
within the vessel sufficient for the desired S02 removal.
The absorber vessel R-201, 31 ft Dia. x 50 ft overall is
supported from a structural steel tower over the recycle
pumps, J201A,  B and C, and each of these 350 HP pumps had
                             -31-

-------
                                ~\  OUST
                                  cov-x.ec.Tora
    J3aO
CO
to
      CAL.CIMIMO
        SYSTEM
                                  -FKOI^V  DISCH.
                                 OF  EXISTING
                                   I.D.
                                                      FIG-. 9
5O2
                                                                     SYSTEM

-------
            TABLE 4

STREAM PROPERTIES AND COMPOSITION
 ABSORBER AND CENTRIFUGE SYSTEM
STREAM
NUMBERS
Temp. °F

Flow GPM
Solids Content %•
MgO Ib/Min
MgSO . 6H O Ib/Min



0








11
&. SOLID 5
152

174
13. 15
10. 1
181.7
10.1-
2. 32
0. 273
204.5
1352
1556. 5


5

162
0
411,000
22,840
2,692
6.8
148
.64
0.06



>



























12
BREAMS
132


95. 2
10.1
181.7
10.1
2.32
0. 273
204. 5
10.7
213.27















13



161







1342
















14

60

64







531
















16 17

180

68.4



i

i
i
570

63















-------
half the design flow of the recycle stream.

     The recycle stream itself is split into three streams
for distribution before reentering the venturi absorber.
The flow in each stream is adjusted and set by plug valves
to provide a uniform irrigation to a) the converging surfaces
and b) the torroidal section of the throat area.  Distri-
bution of absorbing slurry to the torroidal section is made
by 12, six inch nozzles.  A similar number of tangential
nozzles supply the outer converging section while the inner
cone is supplied by a single central nozzle.

     The slurry enters the upper part of the absorber with
the untreated flue gas, which is diverted from the stack,
using the dampers, through the booster fans K-201 A & B,
each driven by an 800 HP motor,and each designed to handle
283,000 ACFM. at a discharge head of 12 in water.  The gas
and slurry mixture passes through the throat area into a
diverging section, then into a central downcomer to exit the
vessel the flow of the cleaned flue gas turns one hundred
eighty degrees upwards.  In this step most of the larger
liquid droplets are disengaged.from the flowing gas stream
and fall to the slurry pool in the conical base of the ab-
sorber.  The treated flue gas continues upwards through a
slot-type mist eliminator to further remove any entrained
liquid before the gas exits to the stack through the louvre-
type damper.

     A stream of slurry, approximately 1.0% of the total
recycle, is taken from the discharge of the recycle pumps
to the centrifuge, R-301.  This is a 36 in x 72 in hori-
zontal, solid bowl unit driven by a 200 HP motor,and in
normal operations it removes 50% of the solids in the liquid
stream going to it.

     The solids separated in the centrifuge contain an amount
of sulphur (as MgSO3 or MgSC>4) equivalent to the sulfur di-
oxide removal rate in the absorber.  The centrate is discharg-
ed  directly to an agitated tank, G-301 of 3,000 gallon
capacity which serves as a pump tank for this system,and then
is returned to the basin of the absorber by pumps J-301 A&R.

     The additional water, necessary to make up for that lost
                             -34-

-------
by saturation of the incoming flue gas, is also added to the
basin of the absorber,and in normal operation this reservior
contains approximately 15,000 gallons of slurry.  The other
sources of water entering the system are. small amounts added
as pump seal water and an additional quantity used as a mist
eliminator wash; the latter is an intermittent addition.

     The flow, sheet for the centrifugeing and drying section
is shown in Fig. 10.  The centrifuge cake separated in the
centrifuge is fed to a dryer by screw conveyer 0-402, a 34
ft long unit with a 14 in diameter ribbon flight.  The dryer
is a countercurrent, rotary unit 7 ft 6 in in diameter by
60 ft long.  Originally of conventional design, this unit
was modified to suit the process as outlined in a later sec-
tion..  Heat is supplied from an integral 18 ft long oil fired
..combustion chamber at a maximum heat release rate of 25 MM
BTU/hr.

     The dryer off.gas exits through a multiple cyclone array
and the gas is discharged to the entrance of booster fan K-
201 B.  Then, mixed with one-half of the entering flue gas,
it is cleaned of its remaining particulate loading in the
venturi absorber.  The cyclones are designed to remove 90%
of the solids entering in the dryer off gas, and the separa-
ted solids pass through a rotary valve to enter a pneumatic
conveying system discharging to the product silo.  In addi-
tion, some dryer product entering the spill-back bin of the
dryer is transported in the same system to the product silo.

     The dryer product is discharged to MgSO^ conveyer #1,
0-403, a 13 ft long unit with a 9 in diameter, solid flight
screw.  The dried solids pass through a finger-type lump
crusher before entering the boot of the MgSC^ elevator de-
signed to handle 5 TPH of anhydrous MgSO.,.  The product is
finally conveyed by MgS03 conveyor No.2, 0-405;(similar to
0-403, except only 6 ft long) to the MgSCU storage bin 1-401.

     The storage bin, 1-401, was an existing ash storage
silo of tile construction.  This silo, 81 ft high and 25 ft
4 in diameter, houses the MgSCU conveyor, 0-403, and the
pneumatic conveyor blower and dust collector in its top sec-
tion.  The MgSCU screw conveyor unloading system, and the
control room and motor control center are in its bottom sec-
tion.  Approximately a 33 ft high section of the silo, with
                             -35-

-------
a capacity of 16,000 cu ft is used for the temporary storage
of
   .  The flat bottom of this silo has four discharge open-
ings connected in pairs to two parallel discharge screw
conveyors  (0-407 A&B).  Each of the conveyors contain two
short sections of contra -rota ting 14 in  helicoid flight
with a center discharge to a similar unit  (0-407C), which
cross feeds the MgSO^ to a center discharge located over the
our-loading belt, 0-408, MgS03 Conveyer #3.

     This 103 ft long, 18 in wide rubberized belt conveyor
exits the silo into an elevated gallery which carries the
product MgSOo to the truck station where it is gravity load-
ed through a flexible spout to the waiting hopper truck.
Oversize lumps (+3/4 in) of MgS03 are scalped off on an in-
clined screen in the discharge chute and pass to a hammer
mill, MgSO_ recycle crusher, located at grade for size re-
duction.  The milled material is conveyed back to the belt
by a continuous flow conveyor.

3.2.2  Magnesia Regeneration System

     Magnesium sulfite from the absorption system is received
at the regeneration facility, the .regeneration section
flow sheet is shown in Fig. 11.  The salt is unloaded from
hopper trucks to the sulfite silo 1-501 through a 4 in pneu-
matic conveying system similar to that used for MgO at the
power station.  The sulfite silo was an existing tile
structure, 20 ft in diameter x 60 ft high, which was water-
proofed before this use.  Sulfite is unloaded from this silo
through a pair of inclined screw conveyors, MgSO_ conveyors
1 and 2, 0-509 and O-510,  equipped with 12 in diameter heli-
coid flights, which carry the material from the below grade
discharge spout to the boot of the MgSO_ elevator.

     This elevator, O-511, a continuous discharge unit 54 ft
high, is designed to handle 9 TPH of MgSO^.  It discharges
to the MgS03 feed bin, G-506, a 6 ft diameter by 11 ft high
vessel equipped with a vibrating bottom, which also serves
as a surge bin for the weigh feeder O-514.  This weigh feed-
er is continuously variable to a maximum capacity of 3.6 TPH
and discharges to the calciner conveyor 0-512, a 33 ft long
horizontal unit equipped with a 9 in diameter helicoid screw.
                             -36-

-------
Coke is also discharged to this screw which serves to mix
the two components as calciner feed prior to processing.

     The coke is pneumatically conveyed to the coke feed bin
0-505, 9 ft diameter x 19 ft high, which also serves as the
storage bin for this material.  It is metered to the calcin-
er conveyor by a weigh feeder which is also continuously
variable up to a maximum capacity of 2.5 pounds per minute.
The two streams (3 & 4 of Fig. 11) enter at points 9 feet
apart and mix in the remaining 22 ft section of the conveyor
before reaching the calciner elevator 0-513, a 43 ft high
centrifugal discharge unit.  This elevator feeds directly to
the calciner R-501.

     The calciner is a refractory lined, oil fired, rotary
kiln, 7 ft 6 in ID and 120 ft long.  Rotational speed is
variable between 1.5 and 2 RPM using a variable diameter
pulley drive, and the kiln has a slope of 3/8 in per foot.
The calciner product empties into four tube coolers attached
directly to the shell of the kiln.  The tube coolers are
equipped with internal flights to contact the existing hot
regenerated magnesia with incoming air which serves as
secondary combustion air in the calciner, thus cooling the
calciner product before it empties to the MgO conveyor #1,
0-503.

     This is a 9 in diameter helicoid screw conveyor, 54% ft
long, which elevates the product from the calciner tube
cooler discharge seventeen feet to an enclosure housing the
MgO processing equipment..  The regenerated MgO is discharged
from 0-503 to a magnetic pulley for tramp iron separation.
The MgO then passes through a 1 in mesh vibrating screen and
enters a high speed pulverizer which reduces it to the fin-
ished grind shown in Table 18.

     The cleaned,  cooled, and pulverized regenerated magne"-
sia flows by gravity to the MgO elevator 0-504, a contin-
uous discharge design, 89 ft high, which brings the material
to the top of the MgO storage silo where it is loaded by
means of a horizontal screw conveyor (MgO Conveyor #2) O-505
equipped with a 9 in helicoid screw.

     The MgO silo, 1-502, 25 ft in diameter and 45 ft high,
                              -37-

-------
'8
                                   FIG. 10
                              DRYING-  SYSTEM

-------
              TABLE 5

STREAM PROPERTIES AND COMPOSITION
             DRYING SYSTEM
STREAM
NUMBERS
Temp. ° F
Pressure IN WC

Gas Flow ACFM

CO
Dry Gas Ib/Min
HO Vapor Ib/Min
SO2 Ib/Min

SO0PPM (Dry Basis)
2
Fly Ash Ib/Min
Mg+S Compounds Ib/Min
Total Dust Ib/Min
1 . 2
GAS STREAMS
400
+ 1

20, 700

771. 0
124
0.8



0
1.06
1.06



|

70
0

10, 300

769






STREAM
NUMBERS
Temp. °F

Flow GPM

MgO Ib/Min
MgSO.,. 6H O Ib/Min
O ^
MgSO4- 7H2O Ib/Min
MgSO, Ib/Min
MgSO Ib/Min
Inerts Ib/Min
Fly. Ash Ib/Min
3.. 	 	 .!_._ 	 ._.. _:5._..__ 	 	
LIQUID & SOLID STREAMS
132



10. 1
181. 7
. 10. 1


2.32
0. 273
Total Solids Ib/Min : 204. 5
HO Liquid Ib/Min
i Total Flow Ib/Min
10. 7
215. 2
I % Solids 95. 2
i
, Fuel Oil Ib/Min
i
f i
400



10.0


88.0
4.89
2.32
0. 273
105. 5
0
105. 5
100. 0



i ;
.
250

2. 3












18.8
:


-------
                                                                  TO SUL.FUR.IC
                                                              a-HQT^t*^ VIBRATIN&
l\
             SYSTEM
                                  IH^MiCAL CONSTRUCTION  CORPORATION
                                  C'.-.'j\.r}>!r, :-?fS'GNiNG 'V'JO CONTRACTING ENGINEERS
                                                           U 5.A

-------
          TABLE 6

STREAM PROPERTIES AND COMPOSITION
     MgO REGENERATION SYSTEM
STREAM
NUMBERS
Temp :°F
Pressure PSIG
Flow GPM
3 4 56 7.8 9 10
11 12 13
LIQUID & SOLID STREAMS
i 300 250 160 160

1.5 91 2
i
Mg(HSO )2 Ib/Min
•
MgO • Ib/Min 8.24 38.35
MgSO0 Ib/Min 72. 50
0 '
MgSO. Ib/Min
4. 12 :
Inerts Ib/Min 1.89 . 1.81
Fly Ash Ib/Min
0.25 0.25
Total Solids Ib/Min 87.0 : 2 40.41 !
HO Ib/Min !
£i •
Total Flow Ib/Min
87.0 ; 2 40.41 760
Fuel Oil Ib/Min 12
I :
STREAM
NUMBERS
Temp. ° F
Pressure In. W. C.
Flow ACFM
90

119

0.88 |



1.5
0. 1

0.1
13.4
15.88










99. 2


150

125. 5










1045

150

Amb. 80

80 1.5 205
• -'1
















1
65

I - .
1 2 14 . •
12 1708



GAS STREAMS '
100 70 100 i
-45 0 -45
2,980 , 2,140 640
Flow SCFM 2,460 : 2,100 529
Total Dry Gas Ib/Min
HO Vapor . Ib/Min
Total Wet Gas Ib/Min
SO Ib/Min
O Ib/Min
Dry Gas MW

206.2 161 39.0
9.0 j 0.8
215.2 39.8
44. 7 j
1.8 i
34.4 i 29 i 29
i












-------
is equipped with a vibrating hopper bottom, 0-506, and
elevated on a structural steel support for direct gravity
loading of the returning trucks.

     The gas from the calciner, containing SO,, and products
of combustion, as well as a small percentage of excess air,
is first partially cleaned of particulates in the cyclone
dust collectors P-075.  This is a dual cyclone array, design-
ed  for a 1 in pressure drop.  The collected solids are
returned to the calciner with the feed to the unit.

     The partially cleaned calciner gas containing 8-10% SO2
is further cleaned in a venturi scrubber of Chemico's  spec-
ial design, operated at a pressure drop of approximately 25
in of H20 where it is also adiabatically saturated. Next
the gas enters the separator tower section, which is an in-
tegral part of the venturi equipment.  The lower section of
this 4h ft diameter vessel serves as a cyclonic liquid sep-
arator and the upper section, containing eight feet of 3%
in pall rings is irrigated with cooled weak acid to further
reduce the temperature of the gas to 100°F in order to main-
tain the acid plant's water balance.  A slip stream of the
cooling liquor is stripped of dissolved S02 in the weak acid
stripping tower P-502, a small (15 in diameter x 14 ft high)
packed contactor.

     The stripped SO  joins the main gas stream and is duct-
ed to the acid plant in 18 in diameter, FRP pipe.

3.2.3  Acid Plant Modifications

     The regeneration of magnesia, described in the previous
section, produces an off-gas from the calciner approximately
100 fold richer in S02 than the power plant combustion gases
treated in the SO2 Absorption System.  The calciner gas is
of sufficient strength to be used as a feed for the manufac-
ture of sulfuric acid.

     The small, sulfur burning acid plant  (Sec. 3.1.2) re-
quired some modifications to enable it to accept the calcin-
er gas.  Provisions were also made during these modifica-
tions allowing the plant to burn sulfur as an alternative
source of SO , or to operate on a combined feed from both
                            -42-

-------
combustion of sulfur and gas from the regeneration plant.
These modifications are shown in the Process Flow Diagram,
Fig. 12.

     The principal element replaced in the acid plant was
the Main S0,j Blower, K-901.  The original blower handled
only air required for the conversion of SC>2 to 363 and was
not designed to be gas tight (as required when feeding the
acid plant with gas containing 802), or capable of the
required control of suction pressure for operating the
regeneration plant.  The replacement blower is an axial flow
compressor of 5,240 CFM capacity driven by a 200 HP motor;
It is capable of a suctiori pressure of up to 44 in of H2O
for the venturi pressure drop,  duct and equipment losses,
and calciner draft at the regeneration plarit, and a 75 in
H20 discharge pressure for the acid plant.  The unit was
designed to handle either air or a typical feed gas as shown
below:

                    Acid Plant Feed Gas

                    S02       6.8%

                     02       9.4%

                     N2      74. T/o

                    C02       8.1%

                    CO        0.9%

The blower was equipped with an adjustable recycle control
in order to accommodate the variable feed rate of the regen-
eration plant.

     Another important element added to the acid plant was
the Cold Heat  Exchanger E-901.  This piece of equipment
supplies the heat to the incoming cold calciner gas equiva-
lent to that available in the gas when burning sulfur in the
sulfur furnace.  This is necessary to ensure that the gas
entering the first mass of the primary converter is hot
enough to sustain the reaction.  The exchanger, E-901, is a
vertical shell and tube unit 3 ft diameter x 9 ft high con-
taining 1700 sq ft of surface.  Hot gas exiting the secondary
                             -43-

-------

1
\£2
_D
SFfR
'PS


I I ^
r^^
.r--ji_
1

%J

q
'I
                                                                           J»A PRODUCT ACID
                                                                             TO sroBAce:
                                                                              •-TO »8*4 PUUP TANKS
                                                                              -C » RETUBM
                                                                                       TO
                                                                                     ATMOSTMEP.C
                                                       ABSOBFTtOM

                                                         TOWER
                 FIG.  12
SULFURIC  ACID PLANT —  PROCESS FLOW DIAGRAM
      AT ESSEX CHEMICAL CO. RUMFORD. R.I.

-------
converter enters the tube side on E-901 and heats the cal-
ciner gas passing through the shell side to 540°F.

     In the acid plant, calciner gas enters (Stream 1 on
Fig.12) and is diluted with sufficient air through the air
filter for conversion and passes to the acid plant's drying
tower where it is contacted with 93% sulfuric acid to remove
the water from the gas.  Entrained liquid is removed.in F-
901A, the Dry Tower.  Any S02 absorbed by the 93% acid in
these towers is stripped in the new 93% Acid Stripping Tower
(F-903), a 30 in diameter x 15 ft high ceramic tower con-
taining a 10 ft bed of 1^ in saddles,and returned to the
main gas stream.  The small amount of additional air is used
for trim of the oxygen concentration.  The gas is pressuriz-
ed by the SC^ blower and enters the Cold Heat Exchanger,
passes to the Converter Heat Exchanger E-902 and finally
enters the converters H-901 A & B.  The heat balance for the
conversion step is maintained by using the gas from the
second mass of the Primary Converter, H-901A, to heat the
gas from the Cold Exchanger, and the gas leaving the fourth
mass of the secondary converter to heat the incoming feed.

     Next, the stream containing 6.7% SCU is contacted with
98% H2S04 in the Absorption Tower F-902 A & B.  The gas
streams from these towers are first demisted in R-902 A & B,
then the remaining SCU is removed in the Tail Gas Scrubbing
section shown in Fig. 13 to reduce the concentration of SO-
leaving the plant to allowable levels.

     The absorbant used in the Tail Gas Scrubbing section is
NaOH solution.

     In order to allow a rapid change to sulfur burning,
when the plant is operated on 100% calciner gas, the sulfur
furnace was equipped for oil firing.  The combustion pro-
ducts from this operation are vented to the atmosphere
through a short stack which could be bypassed.  In normal
operation, however, sulfur was burned concurrently because
of a low MgSCU feed rate.  This procedure had the advantage
of allowing a rapid change should the calciner gas flow be
interrupted.  The alternative was possible because of the
several dampers which had been incorporated into the
ductwork.
                              -45-

-------
                                                                                    KJOTE.:
                                                                                    * NOt-OH, WATER MAKE-UP TO
                                                                                        	  	  ^.epFUjeNJT
&CIO T*UANT
     IAJATVR
  TAMK.THUCK
  lin.l. iriMw
MAXIMUM f|,gV>J ^

     r=N

                                    COHTi
                                   Y
                                              RCCVC.US
                                           -&?»-s-s
                                           STCAM
                                           ee> IV-
                             OUMP

                     TAIL.  GAS  SCRUBBING SYSTEM

-------
           TABLE 7
STREAM PROPERTIES AND COMPOSITION

    TAIL GAS SCRUBBER SYSTEM
STREAM NUMBERS
Temperature ° F
Pressure IN WC
Flow ACFM

Dry Gas Ib/Min
H2'O Ib/Min
Wet Gas Ib/Min
SO, (Design) Ib/Min
^ SO2 PPM Dry
-1 By Volume

I
160
0
4, 250

279
0
279
3. 0
5000


2
165
14
4140

279
0
279
3. 0
5000


3
77
0
5600

276. 3
5.6
281. 9
0. 3
500


STREAM NUMBERS
Temperature ° F
Flow GPM

NaOH Ib/Min
Na2SO3 Ib/Min


H2O Liquid Ib/Min
Total Solution Ib/Min


4
77
152


299


1266
1565


5
Amb.
0. 6

3.75



3.75
7. 5


6
77
3.0


5. 9


23. 6
29.5


7
Amb.
3.0





24. 6
24. 6

	
8
77
76


149. 5


133
782.5



-------
             4.0  DESCRIPTION OF WORK PERFORMED
     In order to proceed with the development of the process
in the large prototype, the program was organized into a
series of tasks as follows:

                  a)  Construction
                  b)  Pre Start-Up
                  c)  Start-Up and Break-In
                  d)  Planned Operational Tests
                  e)  Operational (Long Term) Tests

     A schedule was established for the completion of these
tasks; however, some slippage.from this schedule was exper-
ienced as outlined in the following sections.  A comparison
of the actual and predicted schedule showing the dates of
initiation and completion of the important tasks is shown
in Fig. 14.
4.1  BOSTON EDISON

4.1.1.  End of Construction Phase

     Labor shortages in some crafts and material delivery
delays were the main problems encountered which resulted in
delaying the construction schedule so that tie-in to the
scrubber could not be made before the end of 1971.  The two
principal items which had to be completed after the tie-in
was made were the precrete work in the ducts and the scrub-
ber lining application.  The precrete work was started to-
wards the end of January 1972.

     The cold weather at that time of year made it necessary
to enclose the absorber vessel in canvas and provide heat in
the enclosure so that the FRP liner.could be applied at the
proper temperatures.  Application of the liner was started
by the middle of February and was completed by the first
week in March.

     The check-out of the dryer, centrifuge and air compres-
sor was completed by the middle of February and installation
of the mist eliminators in the absorber was finished by the
                             -48-

-------
        NEW   ENGLAND  SO,,  CONTROL  PROJECT
                      SCHEDULE  DATE
— SIQ-MIUGj-
OF  COUTRACT
    6-3O-70
            START
          COM5TRLJCTIQM
          	—	
EMD_jCONJ5J_RyCT 10 U
    7-50-71

  PRE  ^>TA_RT UP
  COMPLETION
    IO-I5-TI
-START-UP^
 BREAKIM COMPLETIOk)
              -START
             COMSTRUCTIOM
                I-II-7O
                PRE 5TART-UP
                COMPLETiON)
,PLAMMED  OPERATIONAL
 TESTIW5  COMPLETIOKJ
     f-3 0-73
   OPERATJOWALO-OKJG TERM)
    TESTS COMPLfTJOKJ
          i 2-31-73
PREDICTED -
APT! 1 A 1
/*U 1 UAL














   OPFRATIOKJA
  COMPLFTIOIU
 OF COMTRACT
                                ENJD CONJSTRUCTIOK)
                            START-UP f
                          BREAK1M  COMPLETION)
         PREFORMAMCE
          TESTIIpq-
    6-5O-7O
                                                                   OPERATIONAL
                                                                    TESTS COMPLETIQM

-------
middle of March.

     A mechanical check-out of the dampers prior to the
removal of the  blanking plates isolating the scrubber show-
ed that different linkage and stronger operators were requi-
red before the dampers could be put into service.  This work
was accomplished during the first three weeks in April.  The
initial MgO charge was also received during this period.  By
the end of April  1972 mechanical check-out had been comple-
ted ending the construction phase.

4.1.2  Pre  Start-Up Period                                 :

     The trial operational period was started on April 16,
1972 periodically taking gas to the absorber with the boiler
on low sulfur fuel.  On April 26, the boiler was switched to
high sulfur fuel and, for the first time, solid MgSCU was
removed from the system.  During the following few days sev-
eral new problems were encountered.  The solutions to these
problems were to consume considerable time and effort during
the balance of the year.
                                                        /
     While these problems did cause delays in the demonstra-
tion of the prototype, it had been shown in the first brief
period that the scrubber was capable of performing its pri-.
mary function, removing sulfur dioxide from the power plant
flue gas.  SC>2 removal efficiencies of 90% or greater were
measured during some of these early runs.

     The first and most frustrating of the problems was the
change of crystal type and size in the scrubber slurry which
made subsequent centrifuging and drying difficult.

     Typically, the scrubber would be put on the line when
the solids content built to the concentration for initiation
of centrifuging and the slurry, contained large crystals of
MgSOo.  This, in turn, produced a dry, sandy centrifuge
cake.  After a short period of continuous operation, usually
on the order of 8-12 hours,  the centrifuge cake rapidly
changed from a sandy to a fluid,  creamy consistency.  It was
found that in the initial operational period of the system,
the crystal distribution in the slurry was either larger
than 200 mesh or smaller than 325 mesh with little material
distributed between these two sizes.  (A 200 mesh size was
                            -50-

-------
adopted as the dividing line between describing larger and
smaller crystals.)

     The crystal size found after the change in centrifuge
cake characteristics was generally less than 325 mesh.  This
same change from a coarse to a fine crystal could take place
even though the scrubber was> not in operation.  If the
scrubber was placed on line and then had to be' taken off the
line before centrifuging, it would be found the following
day that most of the crystals in the slurry would be less
than 200 mesh.

     The change also appeared to be associated with temper-
ature, since the crystals appeared to increase in size if
the scrubber slurry were allowed to cool.  There was also
evidence that the level of magnesium sulfate in the system
had some influence on the size of the crystal formed.

     Early investigations indicated that the coarse crystals
were the hexahydrate form of magnesium sulfite, and the
small crystals were the trihydrate form.  Some work was done
in an effort to find a way to keep the crystal mass in the
hexahydrate form, however, the factors that control the
crystal type had not been clearly defined.

     Operating policy was still to "shut down" when the
centrifuge cake consistency changed.  All attempts to con-
trol the system to produce +200 mesh crystals, by lowering
pH, adjusting slurry solids, etc. were unsuccessful.  At
this point conaideration was given to a process change in
which bleed stream to the centrifuge would be cooled and
then retained in a holding tank till  a desired crystal size
was attained.  An air-slurry cooling tower was designed and
installed and a thickener and associated pumps brought to
the site to pilot this operation on a five gallon per minute
scale.  This scheme was never tried, however, principally
because the scrubber would have to operate in some contin-
uous mode to provide a feed for the pilot plant and no more
than a few hours of operation at a time could be attained.
The practical solution to this problem was associated with
the solution to a completely different one which arose in
the first operation.
                              •51-

-------
     When the centrifuge cake was first fed to the dryer it
was found that most of the material could not get through
the dryer, rather, the dried product was entrained and
carried out of the dryer with the off-gas stream.  Through-
out May, June, and early July of 1972 a series of modifica-
tions were made to the dryer design to allow a reduction in
dryer gas velocity while still providing a drying capacity.
The most significant of these was the removal, in a series
of changes, of most of the flights in the dryer drum.  In
addition, the feed end dam was increased in height to re-
duce spill back and the top of the feed screw housing in
the dryer was cut away to allow cake which was adhering
to this housing to fall into the screw and be reconveyed
to the drum.

     As a result of the dryer modifications, all the flights
had been removed from the feed end of the drum,and on some
occasions is was noted that the dryer feed would agglome-
rate in the feed end and pass' through the unit in the form
of lumps.  These lumps ranged from balls about one inch in
diameter, to larger agglomerates up to 18 inches in dia-
meter.  These large agglomerates caused problems in the
material handling equipment after the dryer, and even the
smaller pieces could not be handled by the pneumatic un-
loading system when the magnesium sulfite was shipped to
Rumford so that the policy of shut down of the F.G.D.
system as soon as troubles developed was continued.

     A separate problem which hindered the early runs was a
rapid build-up of solid material on the damper blades and
frames in the fan and outlet ducting.  This build up made
the dampers difficult to open when putting the scrubber on •
the line.  Several minor modifications were made in an at-
tempt to overcome this difficulty, but it was finally neces-
sary to replace the pneumatic operators with more powerful
ones developing sufficient torque to break the dampers loose
from the accumulated material.

     During this first period the dryer burner was still
another problem source as it was subject to frequent flame-
outs and a tendency to coke in the burner block.

     All of these difficulties limited the duration of oper-
ating periods to less than 24 hours and resulted in frequent
                           -52-

-------
"dumping" of the scrubber slurry as attempts were made to
maintain the "sandy" centrifuge cake.

4.1.3  Start-Up and Break-In Period

     By early July 1972 it was evident that the crystal type
and size produced in the absorption step could not be con-
trolled by any simple changes in the equipment or operating
conditions.  The technique of allowing the scrubber slurry
to cool to form larger crystals had had sporadic success and
was not a satisfactory solution.  'Any significant process
changes would have required extensive pilot testing, and
no facility for this testing was available.

     The intermittent operations of the previous month did
indicate that successful operation might be possible if the
centrifuge cake could be made to granulate, if there were no
adherence of the centrifuge cake to the dryer shell, and if
the agglomerates could be handled in the subsequent equip-
ment.

     A test was planned in which the dryer temperature pro-
file would be adjusted to give the maximum feed end skin
temperature possible, consistent with good operation, to see
if the build up problem could be eliminated by the formation
of agglomerates.

     Feed was to continue to the dryer when the consistency
of the cake changed unless there was an indication of heavy
build-up or other serious problems.  This test run was
started on July 18, 1972.

     The operation proved to be successful and the system
ran for three days.  During this time other unrelated prob-
lems were encountered causing two brief interruptions.  The
first was flame-out in the dryer resulting in a 12 hour
interruption.  A breakdown of the MgSO3 weigh feeder in the
materials handling train caused the second six hour stoppage.
During this second stoppage, the flue gas was diverted from
the scrubber using the dampers, but all other equipment was
kept operating to facilitate return to service of the system.
After a temporary chute was installed to bypass the MgSO-j
weigh feeder which had caused the trouble, the unit ran for
an additional thirty hours before a tear in the dryer feed
                             -53-

-------
conveyor trough forced a termination of the test run.  This
breakthrough operation demonstrated that no major changes
in equipment or process would be required to continue with
the planned operational program.  Additional improvements
and modifications were required, however, before the system
could operate for the long durations necessary to determine
availability and commercial applicability.

     Corrosion in areas of the duct was also noted during
this time.  These were temporarily patched while plans were
made to protect the parts of the gas flow system which had
not originally been protected by ceilcoat or precrete.

     These difficulties limited operations to an intermitt-
ent basis for several weeks while corrective action was
taken.

     The scrubber again was put on the line late in August,
and operated continuously for five days,  except for a brief
6 hour period when the boiler was out of service for minor
repairs.  During this run, all equipment functioned satis-
factorily with the exception of the dryer burner.  Although
the burner was no longer subject to flame-outs, now not
enough fuel could be burned to provide enough heat input to
dry the centrifuge cake properly.  In order to compensate
for this the draft through the dryer was increased, and in
turn, resulted in excessive amounts of dust being carried
out of the dryer and into the boiler stack.  The situation
gradually became worse,  and on August 31st, it was decided
to suspend operations until corrective action could be taken.

     During the August run, the scrubber system was shown to
be capable of adapting to the changing boiler load which
typically was about 150 MW in the daylight hours and 30 MW
at night.  The scrubbing efficiency observed during this run
was also consistently high.

     September and part of October were spent in making ca-
pacity checks on the dryer burner, velocity checks on dryer
gas flow, and entrainment checks on the scrubber itself, and
no operations were conducted.  System modifications were
also completed during this period including installation of
a lump breaker for the dryer product, a dust collector for
the magnesium sulfite weight totalizer and installation of
                               -54-

-------
a low sulfur fuel supply to the dryer burner as the burner
capacity checks in early September had shown that the unit
did not burn its rated amount of high sulfur fuel.

     This latter problem was attributed to the properties
of the station's fuel.  Nominally a #6 oil, it contained a
relatively large amount of volatile material so that when
the oil was heated to the temperature necessary to obtain
the proper viscosity for atomization in the dryer burner,
the volatile component would vaporize with the subsequent
flashing restricting the capacity of the burner.  To over-
come this limitation, piping was installed to allow the dry-
er burner to draw upon the station's low sulfur fuel supply.
Later, additional work was done on the burner which allowed
it to operate at a higher pressure, and thus prevent the
flashing of the volatile fraction of the oil to make it
capable of operating at rated capacity on either fuel.

     The dryer gas velocity checks showed that high dryer
draft caused the excessive dust carryover experienced on
the run in late August.  These tests also showed that even
under normal operating conditions the dust carryover was
higher than desirable as the dryer was originally designed
to process a much coarser material than the fine material
which was formed in the prototype system.

     The system was returned to operation in mid-October
following adjustment and debuging the new equipment which
had been installed.  A forty-hour run filled the magnesium
sulfite storage silo.  Magnesium sulfite was hauled to the.
calciner operation in Rumford and the first 74 tons of re-
cycled magnesium oxide was returned to Boston and added to
the magnesium oxide silo.  The scrubber was put back on the
line on October 21st, and within 12 hours, recycled magne-
sium oxide was being fed to the scrubber system.  At that
point, severe plugging occurred in the MgO slurry piping,
and the system had to be taken off the line.

     It was found that this first recycled magnesium oxide
varied considerably in its properties.  Much of the material
was over calcined (hard burned),and the coarse particles did
not slake when the MgO was slurried.  After clearing the
piping system and installing flush-out connections, for fut-
ure use the scrubber was again returned to operation,but
                             -55-

-------
plugging of the MgO slurry system continued to be a problem.

     Plugging of the MgO slurry system continued after the
calciner operating conditions were modified to produce a
softer, satisfactory burn material.  Indications were that a
grinder was required to reduce the particle•size of the cal-
cine, so that a slurry could be produced free of large part-
icles and grit.  Enough data were obtained during this per-
iod to show that the pH of the scrubber slurry could be
maintained at the proper level, and that the pH and free
MgO level was sufficient to remove 90% of the incoming S02-

     During the month of November, a scheduled outage of the
#6 boiler was taken for maintenance and repair.  During the
same period, maintenance was planned for the S02 abatement
system.  Principal items of work done were precreting of the
fan housings to prevent the corrosion caused by condensation
in the duct work.  The recycle pumps were inspected and sev-
ere erosion-corrosion was noted on the impellers and wear
plates.  The impellers were replaced from spare parts and
orders placed for stainless replacements.  All the other
pumps were inspected at this time.  Additional steam tracing
was installed where necessary for freeze protection during
the upcoming cold weather.  A preliminary attempt to heat
the MgO slurry tank was made.  A DuPont S02 analyzer was
added to the system to monitor the inlet and outlet sulfur
dioxide concentrations, as the analyzer installed origin-
ally proved to be unsatisfactory as it plugged up during
brief periods of operation.

     An inspection of the scrubber at this time showed no
heavy deposits, but there was a light build-up of solids in
the vicinity of the tangential nozzles.  The scrubber lining
was found to be intact and in generally good condition ex-
cept for some wear on the vertex of the torus where over-
lapping spray patterns had caused abrasion of the FRP lining.

     A serviceable Micro-Pulverizer was located at the acid
plant and evaluated.  These tests indicated it would produce
a ground product suitable for reuse in the system.  This
unit was a 2D-H model with a 10 HP drive.

     By December, the pulverizer had been installed at the
discharge of the MgO weigh feeder at Mystic Station and an
                             -56-

-------
attempt was made to return the system to operation using
recycled MgO.  The run was aborted after a brief operating
period when the pulverizer plugged.

     This plugging problem was caused by tramp material and
clinkers of calcined MgO.  Most of the tramp material was
uncalcined MgS03 which had not been completely unloaded from
the trucks prior to loading with MgO.

     Vibrating screens were installed to scalp off the tramp
material prior to introduction into the pulverizer feeder,
but because of limited clearances around the MgO feed system
and high maintenance requirements, this was not successful.

     During the few short periods of operation in December,
heavy build-up was also experienced in the dryer drum.  The
dryer feed caked on the walls to the extent that a shut down
of several days duration was required to clean it.

     Also during December, Boston Edison Company asked the
local and state authorities for an extension of the time
limit for the installation of pollution abatement equipment
on their new Mystic #7 unit which was under construction.
The appeal was based on the demonstrated progress of the MgO
process which had been gained in the operations at Mystic
Station since April.  The appeal was granted in January 1973.

     In the first quarter of 1973, several major modifica-
tions were made based on the previous operating experience
to improve the "on stream" time of the system.  In January,
the dryer off-gas was re-routed to the inlet of the scrubber
for particulate matter emissions control after numerous
other schemes had been evaluated and rejected for control.
This selection was based on the conclusion that the 6 inch
pressure drop across the F.G.D. systems venturi scrubber was
sufficient to control the solids carried over from the cyc-
lones of the dryer.  The pulverizer was also moved from
Boston to Rumford and installed at the discharge of the mag-
nesium oxide product conveyor.

     Over-load of the dryer feed screw which had caused some
shut downs was associated with an excess of magnesium oxide
in the centrifuge cake.  Tests showed that slaking of MgO
could be improved by heating the MgO slurry tank.  A steam
                              -57-

-------
sparger was installed in the tank and slurry temperatures up
to 190°F attained.

     Other work undertaken during this period included at-
tempts to remove tramp material recycled to Boston by in-
stalling screens at the MgO weigh feeder discharge.  MgO
proved difficult to screen as it adheres to surfaces and
wires, blocking even the coarsest screens tried, \ inch
mesh.  A pre-mix tank was substituted to allow the grit to
settle while the ground MgO is fed to the slurry tank as
overflow.  As a precaution, a stand-pipe was installed on
the discharge nozzle of the MgO slurry tank allowing agglo-
merates to be blown down on a regular basis.

     The improved operations during this period proved the
efficacy of the modifications; however, dryer build-up con-
tinued as the most frequent cause of shut down.  In April,
a final series' of changes and additions were made to improve
operations.  These were:  installation of "hammers" on the
dryer, a pneumatic conveying system to take the cyclone
underflow and dryer spill-back directly to storage, and lengthen-
ing of the dryer conveyor in the dryer.  A modification
to the pre-mix tank was made to prevent blockages of the
down" comers and new design damper operators were installed
in an attempt to overcome the old sticking damper problem
which had delayed numerous start-ups throughout the program.
In a preliminary run at the end of April most of the old
problems appeared to be corrected,and it was considered pos-
sible to enter into the next phase of the test and develop-
ment program to provide data which would lead to improved
operations and optimization of the system.

4.1.4  Planned Operational Testing

     Initial operations in May 1973 indicated a substantial
improvement in the process reliability.  Slaking of the MgO
slurry at a temperature of 180°F reduced the consumption of
MgO required for pH control and proper S02 removal.  Analy-
sis of the centrifuge product indicated a substantial reduc-
tion in the amount of free MgO indicating a greater utiliza-
tion of the recycled alkali in the absorption step.

     A labor problem at the station in May prevented further
operation of the system during that month.  Upon resumption
                             -58-

-------
of work in June, the dust handling system was completed and
the system was started up.

     During the month of June nine interruptions occurred.
Six of these outages were caused by boiler related problems
but the other three were failures of the F.G.D. System.
These three were:  first, a stalled dryer feed conveyor
caused by neglect to clean the dryer feed screw before the
system was returned to operation; second, a dryer upset
caused by a large agglomerate jamming the dryer product
screw;and finally, a shutdown because of high level in the
dryer product silo.  The latter resulted from insufficient
equipment to transport MgSC>3 at the rate it was being pro-
duced.

     In all, during June, 376 hours of operation were logged
and scrubber availability to the boiler increased to 68%.

     Operations of the system continued into July.  The main
difficulty to operations being the constant attention neces-
sary to prevent the MgO pre-mix tank from plugging.  On the
4th of July, the #6 boiler developed an economizer tube leak
and was shut down.  During this outage leaks in the recycle
piping and valves were patched,and a revised pre-mix tank
was substituted.  A manual valve was also substituted for
FCV-5 controlling the flow to the centrifuge as the pinch
valve, which had been part of the original design, proved
to be unsuitable.  The system was returned to service on the
6th but deposits on the dryer feed screw and in MgO pre-mix
tank which had to be removed on a regular basis by the oper-
ators and leaks which continued to appear in the recycle
piping caused operating difficulty.  In addition, a blockage
(later found to be a plastic bottle) occurred in the centri-
fuge feed line restricting flow.  A boiler tube failure on
the 14th terminated this run.

     A stack inspection was performed at this time, and it
was found that the upper 10 ft of the inner stack was damag-
ed (this damage was unrelated to the F.G.D. system).  The
boiler was returned to service on the 15th, and the F.G.D.
system ran till.the MgO supply was exhausted on July 19th.
When sufficient MgO was received, the plant was returned to
operation and continued in service through the 27th, with
two boiler tube failures and some absorber system related
                             -59-

-------
 problems  causing  a  number  of  short  interruptions during that
 period.   A  scheduled boiler outage  was taken on July  27th
 and maintenance on  the boiler and the absorption system oc-"
 cupied  the  rest of  July and most of August.

     No.  6  boiler was back on the line on August 28th, and
 the absorption system on the  30th;  however, difficulty was
 again encountered with sticking booster  fan dampers which
 was not corrected till September 6th.  A  series of attempts
 to  restart  the system were aborted  by:

          1)  A leaking centrifuge  oil cooler

          2)  Dryer feed screw binding

          3)  MgO feed problems

     On September 15th the system was returned to operation
 and during  the first three day period several minor problems
 were corrected with the F.G.D. system in service switching
 from high to  low  sulfur oil.  Smooth operations were  obtain-
 ed  from the 18th  through 21st but again  a low MgO supply
 forced  a  shut-down  after that time.

     The  inventory  was replenished  and the system restarted
 on  the  24th, but  after a short period it had to be shut down
 because of  a  slurry leak which developed at the centrifuge
 feed port.  The cause was  fractured centrifuge feed pipe,and
 four days were taken to correct this problem as the centri-
 fuge was  also dismantled for  an inspection.

     Operations continued  intermittently during the first
 half of the month of October, with  only  78 hours of system
 operation achieved  by the  15th.  The interruptions were a .
 series  of breakdowns of process equipment interspersed with
 a series  of boiler  related failures.  The F.G.D. problems
 were•debugging the  new cyclone underflow conveying system
 and in  the  MgO pre-mix system.

     A  40 hour run  started on the 16th was shut down because
 of  a boiler tube  failure.  Repairs  to the boiler were made
 but the units' return to operational capacity was limited by
•a failure of  the  refractory in the  dryer burner block which
 prevented firing  it at its full rate.  The system was
                               -60-

-------
switched temporarily to low sulfur fuel to control solids
level but another boiler tube failure on the 18th termin-
ated the run,and the system was idle til the 20th.  From
the 20th until the end of the month, the system operated
for 106 hours with one interruption, a 17 hour outage caused
by depleting the supply of MgO.  After transferring a fresh
supply of MgO the system ran for an additional 87.5 hours,
but was forced to shut down after the MgSO  silo at Mystic
filled to capacity with resultant damage to the materials
handling equipment.

     While the MgSO  was being transferred, the dryer feed
screw gear box and the product bucket elevator were repair-
ed, and operations resumed on November 9  and continued
through the 15th with only a 4.5 hour interruption for lack
of MgO.  From the 16th through the end of the month the unit
was down, as the MgO supply had been exhausted, and as a
result of a shortage of fuel oil for the calciner.  Over-all
utilization for the month was 24% based on available hours;
utilization for the week ending November 16th was 84%.

     During the short operating period in November a stack
testing program was conducted and a second series of scrub-
ber emissions tests was run.  A separate particulate matter
emissions test was also conducted by the Environmental Pro-
tection Agency.

     Operations started again on December 7th after the fuel
oil situation had been resolved, and during the next two
weeks continued sporadically with numerous interruptions
caused by malfunctions of the cyclone overflow conveying .
system and leaks in the main recycle pumps.

     The pump maintenance could not be accomplished because
the plug valves to isolate them were severly eroded, requir-
ing that the system be drained to work on it.  A planned •
outage of the absorber system was taken to replace the pumps
and plug valves and to patch several other leaks which had
developed in the top piping.  This limited plant operations
to 86 hours during the month of December.  The system was
returned to service on January 10, 1974 but again a series
of mechanical problems, including an outage of the boiler,
caused intermittent operation of the absorber and numerous
switches between high and low sulfur fuel oil in the boiler.
                           -61-

-------
By January 25th, most of the new problems were corrected and
testing was resumed, but after 30 hours a boiler tube fail-
ure required a two day repair outage.  When the unit was
started up again difficulty was experienced in controlling
the recycle solids concentration in what appeared to be a
reduction in centrifuge separational efficiency.  Operations
were terminated to investigate this,and the centrifuge was
dismantled for inspection and repair.

     During January, the system was operated an additional
147 hours to give a total for December and January of 233
hours.  During this period inventory control was initiated
and the inventory showed a loss of 80 tons of MgO in the two
months operations.

     The absorber system was not returned to service until  .
the 19th of February, 1974 while the centrifuge was being
repaired.  During this same outage several maintenance items
were completed including the installation of a heavy duty
weigh belt on the MgO weigh feeder, venting the dust collec-
tor in the MgSO  silo, replacement of couplings on the re-
cycle pumps, ana the installation of several sample nozzles
for the stack testing to be conducted later in the month.

     The system was started up again but ran only two days
before depleting the supply of MgO.  The coordination of
shipments of material between the two plants was made the
responsibility of the chief Chemico operator to correct this
recurrent problem.  Because of the decision to use only re-
generated alkali while conducting the performance tests
there were no further operations until the 25th in order to
conserve the MgO inventory.  During this wait the by-pass
dampers were calibrated and tested to prepare for a new mode
of operation in which a part of the flue gas would be bypas-
sed so that the system could be operated at its design gas
flow.  Previous testing had established that the system was
handling as much as 650,000 ACFM when the boiler was being
operated at full load (as compared to the design 440,000
ACFM) because of leakage into the ducts ahead of the boiler
ID Fan (Table 8) .

     Also, for the tests, the dryer off-gas which had been
routed to the absorber system in a corrective modification,
was revented to the stack in order to eliminate this
                              -62-

-------
                          TABLE 8
            FLUE GAS DESULFURIZATION - MYSTIC #6
                     ABSORBER GAS FLOW
Date

ll-25-70(1)

11-27-70^1)

10-11-73

10-11-73
        (2)
10-14-73 (2)

3-5-74(3)

DESIGN GAS FLOW
6-1 Duct
Boiler Total Gas
Load Air Flow
(MW) (%} (ACFM)
142 153
142 163
150
149
149 }
151 335,411
LOW
6-2 Duct Total
Total Gas 6-14
Air Flow 6-2
(%} (ACFM) (ACFM)
153
160
573,000
523,807
645,000
322,796 658,207
440,000
                   (2)

                   (3)
                       Boston Edison Company Communications

                       Custom Stack Analysis Co. Report

                       York Research Corporation Report
                       Y-8419, 4/11/74
                              -63-

-------
additional solids emission load on the scrubber,as it had
not been part of the original design.

     The system was started on February 25th for the first
performance tests of the program, but a boiler tube leak on
March 1st forced a shutdown.

     Also during this period, additional tests were conduct-
ed over two days using humidification sprays to determine if
pre-quenching could influence the hydrate formed, and whether
there would be an improvement in the outlet dust loading
The results obtained from the humidification test indicated
that there was no effect from their use.

     Repairs to the boiler were completed on March 5th.  The
F.G.D. system was put in operation, but again a boiler tube
failure forced termination the following day.  The F.G.D.
system was restarted immediately after boiler repairs were
completed and ran satisfactorily for two days before a third
boiler tube failure forced an outage; however,  the perform-
ance testing was completed.

4.1.5  Operational Testing

     Operations during the test period indicated that reduc-
tion of gas flows nearer to design in the system, coupled
with the extensive repairs and numerous improvements and
modifications, had resulted in a more reliable and control-
lable system.  With the substantial experience and operating
information gained in the preceeding two years, it was deci-
ded to start a period of continuous operations 'at a fixed
set of conditions.  Prepatory to starting this new phase the
blanking plate,  which had been removed from the dryer gas
stack breaching for the test work,  was reinstalled so that
the scrubber controlled this particulate discharge source.

     The F.G.D.  system was returned to operation on March
12th and ran smoothly.  On the 15th another boiler tube
failure occurred, repairs were made and operations resumed
on the 18th but were stopped on the 19th by another failure.
Boiler repairs were completed by the 21st,and the F.G.D.sys-
tem ran through the 26th when again a boiler failure forced
an outage.  The system came on as soon as boiler repairs
were completed on the 28th, but was forced out because of a
                               -64-

-------
boiler tube leak the following day.

     During this period, there were also four malfunctions
of SC>2 abatement system equipment.  The first, on the 18th,
was a broken chain on the cyclone underflow star valve.
These repairs took three hours, and during this time the
system was kept on the line on low sulfur fuel.  The second
was a blockage of the dryer screw conveyor on the 22nd (low
dryer temperature allowed wet material to get into the screw
conveyor).  This was corrected.in 4h hours, again, without
taking the system off the line.  The third incident did
force the unit off the line and was caused by a failure of a
small agitator in the MgO pre-mix tank.  A replacement was
on hand but was found to be defective,and an outage of 11
hours had to be taken to repair the agitator.  The fourth
interruption was a four hour outage to replace a broken
chain on the MgO weigh feeder drive.                   ,

     When the F.G.D. system was being restarted on the 30th
a bearing failure was noted in the MgS03 elevator,and no
operations were conducted for the first four days of April,
while waiting for repair parts.  The system was started on
the evening of the 4th and ran continuously through the llth
A carbon deposit in the dryer burner block caused a hot spot
and the system had to come down for one day for repairs,  but
was again in operation on the 13th.  It ran continuously
through the 19th, when a boiler tube failure forced it o.ff
line.  Boiler related failures on the 22nd, 23rd, 24th, 26th,
and 29th of  April resulted in interrupted operations; how-
ever, they also further demonstrated the capability of the
F.G.D. system to cycle with the boiler.  Despite the afore-
mentioned problems April operations were smoother, and. one
hundred percent availability was achieved for the two week
period from the 6th through the 19th.  In all, during April,
the absorber system operated for 471 hours out of 585 hours
available (because of the numerous boiler failures) for an
81% utilization.

     One hundred percent availability of the system was
again achieved during the first two weeks of May.  Then the
system was forced down on the 14th when the MgO supply was
exhausted because of acid plant outage.  The acid plant
outage necessitated shut down of the regeneration section.
MgO production was resumed in late May after the acid, plant
                              -65-

-------
had been repaired.

     Before starting again three additional days were
taken to clear the system of MgO and MgSCU prior to start-
ing an MgO. Loss Identification and Inventory Control Program,
During the month of May, 1974, boiler tube failures on six
occasions were the major cause of program interruptions.
The boiler and F.G.D,, system were operational from the 4th
through the 5th, the llth through the 14th, and from the
28th through the 30th, a total of 280 hours out of 488
available.

     One hundred percent availability of the system was
again achieved during the first two weeks of June.  The MgO
Loss Identification Program was concluded on June 18, 1974
(the MgO feed bin was deliberately run empty to finish this
test).  S02 addition runs were made on June 13th and June
14th, with the injection of four tons of liquid SO« into
the system to increase inlet concentration to its design
value.  But overall availability for the month was still
.limited because of seven boiler tube failures.  Two hundred
eighty-eight hours of F.G.D. system operation were achieved
in 359 hours of boiler operation for an 80% availability.

     The program contract termination date was June ,30th,
1974 but operations were actually concluded on the 26th
when the dryer feed conveyor failed.

4.2  REGENERATION - RECOVERY OPERATIONS (ESSEX CHEMICAL
     PLANT)

4.2.1  End of Construction Phase

     The plant construction had been completed on December
21, 1971; however, operations could not be initiated as the
magnesium sulfite needed for feed was the product of the yet
to be completed SO2 abatement plant.  In the interim the new
main blower was commissioned for acid plant operations in
January, and instruction of operators and the first firing
of the calciner to "cure" the refractory brick work was done
in March.

     During this preliminary work the first operating prob-
lem uncovered was a low draft at the firing hood caused by
                              -66-

-------
excessive leakage of air through the seals and air intakes
of the calciner.  This was a potential process problem,  as
the calciner had to operate with a neutral or reducing at-
mosphere in order to reduce MgSO. which was produced in the
scrubbing step.' Considerable work was expended in tighten-
ing up seals and reducing the air intake leakage.  (This did
provide some improvement; however, when feed was obtained
for processing excess oxygen content in the calciner atmos.-
phere still remained as a problem).

     Another problem wh ich was uncovered in this period
resulted when firing oil in the cold calciner on start-ups.
Hydrocarbon vapors succeeded in passing through' the scrubb-
ing equipment installed for gas clean-up of particulars
matter and entered the acid plant where the hydrocarbon
caused contamination and blackening of the product sulfuric
acid.  A 1500 CFM fan was obtained, ducted tc the calciner
and a stub stack discharge erected in order to provide a
separate venting system for the calciner on start-up. (This
vent is not used when MgSO-j is decomposing in the calciner}.

     While waiting to receive dryer product from Boston for
actual start up, a high noise level condition from the main
blower air intake was also corrected by relocating the in-
take and erecting a sound baffle around the blower itself.

4.2.2  Pre Start-Up Period

     The first dryer product was transported from Boston on
June 20, 1972.  The necessary coke had been obtained prior
to this time and was stored in the coke silo.

     Pre start-up was limited to testing the conveying sys-
tem with the material on hand.  Some work was undertaken in
matching the elevator capacities as the bulk density and
granulation of the. material produced at Boston was. substan-
tially different from that for which the equipment had been
designed based on the original pilot plant work.

     The presence of lumps in the feed material caused dif-
ficulty in material handling at the regeneration plant in
both the pneumatic conveying system and the weigh feeder.
(The solution to this problem involved the determination of
proper operating conditions for the dryer and was not
                            -67-

-------
implemented til'later in the program).

4.2.3  Start-Up and Shake-Down Period

     Start up of the system was not initiated until suffic-
ient dryer product was in inventory in insure five days of
continuous operation.  Material from the Flue Gas Desulfu-
rization system was first fed to the calciner on August 3,
1972.  Problems of low draft in the unit and high oxygen
concentration in the kiln atmosphere were experienced
immediately.

     Natural draft occurs in the calciner because of its
length and pitch.  This draft resulted in high seal leak-
age at the small gas flows required for proper kiln opera-
tion.  This caused "puffing" at the feed hood and excessive
oxygen content in the off gas.  The new corrections for
leakage included removing and machining the firing hoodseal
to provide minimum clearance on the hot shell.  The draft.,
doors were sealed, all openings closed and the product
discharge ports closed by 50%.  This work was done by early
September and resulted in a lessening but not elimination
of the problem.

     During this same period operating policies were deve-
loped to overcome the problem of contamination of the pro-
duct acid by hydrocarbon vapors from the regeneration sect-
ion.  Principally this was accomplished by shunting the
combustion gases to the vent stack after the mid kiln temp-
erature fell below'1000°F.

     Another serious problem was caused by dusting in the
calciner which obscured the flame from the fire, control
monitors and caused frequent shut down of the kiln on a
false "flame failure" signal.  Several approaches were tried
to overcome the numerous "flame.outs" which occurred because
of this.  These included installation of a second flame
scanner for parallel control,and air purging the sight tube
on the main scanner,  and adding magnifying lenses to it.
These improvements did not eliminate the problem as the long
nose burner used extends deeply into the kiln and the high
level of dust still caused shut down.

     In reviewing the problem it was found that normal
                             -68-

-------
industrial practice for operation of dusty kilns was elim-
ination of flame scanning equipment and substitution of
direct operator observation and control.  Work was initiated
at this time to obtain the necessary authorization to oper-
ate the calciner this way.              '  .

     By late September improvement in draft control was acc-
omplished and product of low MgSO^ content was produced;.-
however, the product MgO was still hard burned.  It was-
found that the MgO slaking method which had been proposed
to analyze the product was unsatisfactory, and a decision to
enlarge the scope of the quality control laboratory at Rum-
ford was made to develop the.necessary new analytical methods
for the operation.

     During the month of October the calciner was operated
for 179 hours.  No coke was added during these runs but the
MgS04 content of the product was. held at a low level by   ••
increasing the calciner temperature.  When this level fell
below 3-4%,however, a drop in the MgO activity was noted,
the result of everburning of the MgO at high kiln tempera-
ture.

     The first shipments of regenerated magnesia produced -in
these operations, was made to Boston in November.  Problems
in feeding the MgO were immediately encountered there (as
described in the previous section).  A factor in the problem
of using the regenerated, recycled MgO was a large percent-
age of grit and coarse particles contained in it.

     A micro pulverizer was located and first installed on
the system at the Mystic Station to control the problems
that resulted from the coarseness of the calciner product.
This location was found to be unsatisfactory primarily be^
cause of space and equipment lay-out limitations.

     The annual shutdown of the  Mystic 6 boiler taken in
early November,  coupled with the infrequent operations in
December,  as solutions were sought to improve the activity
of the recycled MgO, resulted in a lack of feed for the re-
generation plant.  Processing was not resumed until January
13, 1973,  after the initial trials.

     During this two month outage the pulverizer was removed
                              -69-

-------
 from the  Boston  Edison  plant  and  re-installed at  the  regen-
 eration  facility.. .It was  placed  at  the  discharge of  the
 calciner  product screw  conveyor after  first removing  the
 MgO  weigh belt.   (The weigh belt  had been previously  found
 to be very  difficult to keep  in operation and its removal
 did  not affect the project.)   In  addition a magnetic  sep-
 arator and  a  vibratory  screen were installed at the feed
 hopper of the pulverizer to protect  the  unit from tramp
materials.   (This pulverizer, which was-available on  short
 notice, was used throughout the project  despite the severe.
 service it  was required to perform.  Its use has  enabled
 gathering information on size distribution in order to
 specify grinding equipment in the. future.)

      After  restarting the  regeneration plant in mid January
 the  modifications and improvements resulted in longer oper-
 ating periods but a new phenomenon was observed,  the  occur-
rence of  "slides" in 'the calciner.  These slides were evidenced
by a  sudden surge of material at the discharge of the
kiln which  stalled the  material handling equipment and the
 pulverizer.   This phenomenon  was  partially controllable if
 the  feed  rate to the kiln  was limited  to 60-80 Ibs/min.,
 (substantially less than 106  Ibs/min design).  Attempts to
 eliminate the "slides"  were limited  to increasing the rota-
tional speed of the calciner in  order to reduce  the  bed
depth, and  control of the  feed rate  to reduce the throughput.

      Neither  of  these has  been completely successful, and
 increasing  evidence indicates that the dryness and size dis-
 tribution of  the dryer  product are also  important.

      Operating at a 60-70  Ib/min  feed  rate and a  1.56 RPM
kiln speed  reduced the  slide  frequency from 30 .per shift to
 1 per shift.  However,  with each  slide heavy dusting  still
occurred  in the  calciner causing  a flame-out on the false .
 signal previously mentioned.

      After  discussion with the fire underwriters, permission
was  obtained  to  bypass  the flame  scanner if an operator was
 stationed on  the firing platform  to tend the unit.  The
 elimination of the frequent interruptions in operation re-
 sulting from  this change to manual control resulted in a
great improvement in the quality  of the  calciner  product
that could  be obtained.                         ;
                              -70-

-------
     Implementation of the quality control tests for SO
efficiency of the regenerated MgO and operator control Based
on the product bulk density measurements resulted in  impro-
vements in both quality and uniformity of the recycled mag-
nesia.

     Other changes were made during the first months in 1973
to eliminate recurring causes of operating problems.  These
were 1) the redesign and installation of a new firing end
friction seal in order to minimize air infiltration at this
point   2)   rebuilding the gas duct at the calciner exit in
order to provide a better transition to reduce pressure drop
in the system, 3)  overhaul of the MgO elevator, and 4) an
air intake outside the building provided for the calciner's
forced draft fan.  All this work was finished by the end of
April, 1973.

4.2.4  Planned Operational Testing

     Operations were resumed early in May and proceeded
smoothly for a four day period.  Coke was added at several
rates during this period with good results.  During this run
120 tons of feed were processed.  The calciner product MgSO^
content averaged 1-3%; S02 utilization factors between 50
and 65 were measured and bulk density of 25-30 Ib/ft  were
observed, all indicative of high quality magnesia.  These
operations raised questions on the role carbon played in the
process.  There was indication that it smoothed operation
because of the different temperature profile obtained with
the addition of coke which can act as a fuel in the feed
stock.

     Before this question could be investigated a strike at
Boston Edison cut off the feed supply,and operations were
again interrupted for a time.  The system was not restarted
until early June,and at this time it was decided to repro-
cess the dryer product without the addition of coke.  During
the June operations the calciner feed rate averaged 36 tons
per day, and 12 tons per day of product were produced and
recycled to the absorption system.

     While numerous material problems still remain to be
solved, it was apparent that the calciner system could
                             -71-

-------
regenerate the dryer product frcm Boston satisfactorily.
Operation of the regeneration system during July 1973 was
almost continuous; 125 hours the first week, 164 hours the
next week, and a total of 65% utilization during the month
with the longest single outage being 24 hours taken to
shorten the chain in the MgO bucket elevator.  The dusty
nature of the feed from Boston did cause numerous brief
problems, literally hundreds of floods of the MgSCu weigh
feeders, recycling in the MgSOo conveyor, etc.  In addi-
tion the pulverizer motor was found to be too small to
handle high flows and stalled out when slides occurred in
the calciner.  Another new problem that became evident with
longer operations was that the C>2 concentration in the cal-
ciner could fall too low as equilibrium was attained.  (This
was an illustration of the efficiency of the improved fric-
tion seals).  As a result, on several occasions elemental
sulfur formed in the calciner which in turn plugged the
venturi scrubber.

     An acid plant shut down which had been scheduled for
the 28th of July was taken and during this time additional
improvements were made at the regeneration facility.  A 20
HP drive was obtained and installed in place'of the 10 HP
drive originally furnished on the pulverizer.   A variable
speed drive was installed on the calciner in the hope of
controlling slides through speed variation, and the MgSO_
elevator was examined and plans made to convert it to a
continuous rather than a centrifugal unit.

     The acid plant was restarted on August 27th and the
regeneration plant on the 30th.  Problems resulting from
the dusty feed noted earlier limited feed rates to app-
roximately 50 Ib/min.  It was thought that these problems
were caused by a segregation of feed in the Boston silo
caused by the introduction of the cyclone underflow (fine
dust)  and more granular dryer product at diametrically
opposite points in the silo.  During the July-August outage
this had been corrected by rearranging the dryer product
discharge back to the center of the silo.  A program of
gradually increasing the feed rate was undertaken,  and a
75 Ib/min rate achieved by the end of September.  Since
changes in feed rate resulted in problems in control of
calciner atmosphere,  reducing conditions were encountered
and sulfur formation caused blockage in the venturi scrubber
                              -72-

-------
on two occasions.  The oxygen analyzer probe and sampling
system were overhauled to eliminate leaks, and to give better
control.

     A period of low pH operations at Boston resulted in a
feed of high iron content (4-5% Fe203),  and processing the
resulting calciner product resulted in rapid wear in the
micropulverizer, but did not stop the processing.  Opera-
tions were conducted when feed was available with the only
interruption an acid plant leak which terminated a four day
run  (September 14 through 18).  A planned shut down was
taken on the 26th to coincide with the centrifuge repairs at
Boston.

     Operations at this plant continued to improve as a
result of the better mixing of dryer product from the scrub-
ber operation.  A feed rate of 80 Ibs per minute was
achieved in October, With 60% operation of the regeneration
system during the first week and 69% operation during the
third week, with most interruptions caused by a shortage of
feed material from Boston.

     During the week of October 26th, the unit was shut down
for additional improvements.  A new weigh feeder, live bin
bottom, and tapered flight in the calciner product screw
conveyor were installed and these improvements further as-
sisted 'in smoothing the operations so that during the last
week of the month operation at an 84% utilization level was
maintained.

     Operations continued into November,with only one major
difficulty, low air pressure to the feeder controller when
the instrument air pressure dropped below 45 psig.  To cor-
rect this a new compressor,  Sullair Series 10, was ordered
with delivery of the unit scheduled for December.

     A bearing failure on the head shaft of the MgS03 eleva-
tor occurred on November 7th, which shut down the plant.
The plant was not restarted after repairs were completed be-
cause the availability of both MgSO3 from Boston and No.4
fuel oil from Essex Chemical could not be assured.  In all,
a total 152 hours of operation were logged during the month
of November.
                             -73-

-------
     The fuel supply question was resolved and calcinar.ior.
of magnesium sulfite from Boston started again in early Dec-
ember.  During the first and second week of December, the
system was operated for 196 hours at better than 60% avail-
ability, and 140 tons of regenerated magnesium oxide were
produced.  Some mechanical difficulty was encountered when
bolts loosened in the bucket elevator and a flood at the
weigh feeder caused a two day outage during the second week.
Operations were briefly continued during the third week and
an additional 21 tons of magnesia produced prior to shutting
down -the system while the Boston unit was being repaired.
During the first three week period, approximately 430 tons
of magnesium sulfite was processed through the kiln .  Sulfur
formation in the calciner was experienced once during that
period and again attributed to strong reducing conditions in
the calciner because of a low C>2 concentration.  Plans were.
made to further redesign and improve the oxygen analyzer
sampling system in order to provide a better continuous in-
dication of off-gas composition to control the unit.

     Magnesium sulfite was processed through the calcining
system during the last two weeks of the month of January,
1974, 72 tons of MgO were regenerated during 115 hours of
operation.  (Plans to start the system earlier had to be
postponed when a defective control valve was found in the
main SC>2 blower recycle loop.  This was a reoccurrence of
a previous failure of the valve seat in the valve.  A new
seat was obtained and installed.)

     During the latter part of the month of January, the new
tail gas scrubber system was tied into the plant during an
acid plant outage.  After the acid plant was restarted, cal-
cining resumed on the 4th of February, but on the following
day the system was forced down by a trip of the acid plant
blower.  During this brief period of operation, the acid
plant reported that some of the acid produced was cloudy, an
indication of the presence of sulfur in the calciner gas.
The shut down period was extended in order to install the
new oxygen analyzer sample system.

     The bucket elevator was changed from a centrifugal dis-
charge type to a continuous type during the following week.
In addition, the tail shaft of the MgSO3 screw conveyor was
extented and equipped with a second bearing in order to
                               -74-

-------
improve its service life.

     Operations were not resumed until the 26th,  as there '•
had been no operations at Boston to produce feed in the pre-
vious weeks.  When the system was restarted,  problems were
encountered in the materials handling equipment,  principally
flooding and recycling of materials in the bucket elevator.
This recycling was attributed to a dusty feed being receiv-
ed from Boston.

     The interrupted operations resulted in only 100 hours
of operation for the month of February, and the production
of 80 tons of regenerated alkali.

     The calciner continued to operate through the beginn-
ing of month of March, but the dusty feed continued to cause
materials handling problems.  Finally, a bearing failed on
the MgSO-j conveyor,and the system was shut down until the
7th.  When the system was restarted, a slide caused an
overload of the MgO conveyor requiring additional time for
maintenance.

     A shortage of feed further limited operations, and the
plant was not restarted until the 13th of March.

     Operations continued through the 15th, when the run was
terminated again because of a bearing failure on the MgSOo
conveyor.  The low feed inventory was replenished during
this time, and the system restarted on the 18th.   At this
time it was noted that draft control in the calciner had be-
come difficult.  The cause of low draft and inability to
meet'acid plant air requirements were traced to a build-up
of dust in the 18 inch duct from the exit of the calciner
cyclone to the venturi scrubber.  An inspection of this line
showed the duct to be almost completely plugged.

     The build-up of dust in the duct was an accumulation
over approximately 1 % years.  This duct had been inspected
and cleaned at the earlier time of a two to four inch accu-
mulation.  Cleanouts are now scheduled on acid plant turn-
around.  Additional consideration was given to blanking off
one of the cyclones on the calciner in order to increase
dust removal efficiency; however, there is a serious pro-
blem with draft control, and it is felt that blanking the
                             -75-

-------
cyclone could cause the situation to worsen.   (This latter"' i:
problem results from a higher delta P  (35") than expected
across the acid plant's drying and dry towers, which are
presently packed with 3 inch partition rings.)  Regener-
ation operation resumed on the 24th and continued through
the end of the month with a series of interruptions from
both acid plant leaks and new problems arising with the
renovated magnesium sulfite bucket elevator.  Despite the
sporadic outages of the regeneration facility, enough MgO
was produced so that the SC>2 abatement plant had sufficient
inventory to continue operations all during the month.  The
tail gas scrubber was started up on the 25th, and measure-
ments showed that satisfactory S02 removal could be attain-
ed in the unit to reduce the acid plant emissions to acc-
eptable levels.

     Repairs were made to the MgSO^ elevator, and, except
for a few brief interruptions caused by acid plant problems
in the early part of April, the system ran until inventory
was exhausted.  This was replenished over two days,and re-
generation was resumed on the 7th of April, continuing
through the 12th,  when another failure of the tail shaft of
the bucket elevator occurred.

     The shaft was replaced with a heavier one, and no fur-
ther breakage was experienced.  The previous five day oper-
ation had again reduced feed inventory, and this was built-
up over the next two days.

4.2.5  Operational Testing

     Operations were resumed in mid-April for a seven day
period,  only stopping after depleting the feed inventory.
The plant was down from the 21st through the 27th awaiting
a supply of feed.   During this period,  a leaking emergency
water spray in the venturi scrubber which had caused plug-
gage of the upstream duct was repaired.

     Shortly after starting up again on the 28th, it became
apparent that some of the refractory brick in the calciner
had loosened.  However,  MgS03 regeneration continued through
the 3rd of May whe n the plant was shut down when one of the
bricks jammed the product screw conveyor.  The problem was
identified as two rings of brick which had loosened near the
                              -76-

-------
feed end of the calciner.  Spare refractory bricks were on
hand so the repair  were accomplished quickly,and the system
was returned to operation from the 7th through the 14th.  At
this time repair in the acid plant necessitated a shut down
while the waste heat boiler was overhauled and regeneration
did not start again until the 24th.  This outage did result
in a shortage of regenerated MgO for Boston, with operations
limited to 152 hours out of an available 280 hours.

     Again in June, the final month of the program, inter-
rupted operations at Boston eventually resulted in a short-
age of feed for calcination.  Thus, the regeneration plant
operated five days in the first week of June, and another
five days the second week with the interim periods shut down
for lack of feed.  This same shortage had prevented attempts
to achieve design capacity of the calcining facility.

     Feed was accumulated during the third week of the month
to initiate some rate and capacity checks, but the results
obtained were inconclusive.  Operations were ended with the
program termination at Boston; however, the same facility
will be used in a continued program with a coal fired power
plant.

     In the period from March 8th through June 14th, 716
tons of MgO were regenerated in 935 hours of operation.
This can be contrasted with 419 tons of MgO regenerated
during 588 hours in the previous four months period.

4.3  SUMMARY OF SYSTEM MODIFICATIONS

     During the course of the project numerous modifications
were made to both plants.  These ranged from major changes
such as rerouting the dryer duct to the scrubber instead of
the stack,to minor ones such as increasing the size of the
calciner bucket elevator tail shaft by 1/8".  While no major
process changes were made or major new equipment required,
all of the many changes and modifications contributed to
improving the operability of the plants in this first proto-
type installation.

     The purpose of modifications fell in three catagories:
first to allow the integrated plants to operate continuous-
ly; second, to increase the reliability and raise the
                              -77-

-------
capacities nearer design values; and third, to achieve the
desired removal efficiencies and demonstrate the regenera-
tion capability of magnesia.  In the first catagory num-
erous problems at both sites still had to be corrected
during the start up period.  Sound levels from the acid
plant main blower had to be reduced to an acceptable level,
pneumatic operators on the ID booster fan dampers at Boston
needed to be changed to a size capable of opening the
dampers,  and capacity matching of the material handling
equipment was required.

     1.  Other modifications required for operation and
accomplished in the first phases of the program during 1972
were:
         A) Removal of dryer lifter flights in the first
         and last third of the drum and removal of the
         lifter lips in the mid-section of the drum,  re-
         quired because the centrifuge cake produced in
         operation was a much smaller crystal size than
         that formed in the pilot plant operation.  Other
         dryer modifications included increasing the  height
         of the rear (feed end)  dam.

         B) The dryer product that was obtained had large
         agglomerates and was also very dusty.   In order
         to correct this problem,  a "finger" crusher  was
         installed at the dryer  exit  to reduce large  agg-
         lomerates to 2" maximum.   The dust problem took
         some time to bring under control,  and the methods
         are described in a later section.

         C) Corrosion of the fan casings at the 6-1,  6-2
          booster fans was corrected  by installing a  pre-
         crete lining in the lower half of the case.   The
         problem was caused by the condensation of vapors
         in the flue gas in the  ductwork when the absorp-
         tion system was idle.  The ducts themselves  had
         been designed and installed  with a liner, but the
         fans,  identical to the  Mystic 6 ID fans,  had not.
         Installation of the lining corrected this problem.

         D) The seals on the calciner were not adequate to
         prevent in-leakage of air and,  thus,  a reducing
         atmosphere could not be attained.   The firing end
                             -78-

-------
        was modified, all necessary openings closed,
     .   ^2 of the tube cooler air intakes blanked off,
        and the seals reraachined to provide the .min-
        imum clearance.  This work .did reduce air
       'infiltration and MgO .was regenerated for reuse
        in the absorption step  (further.work was done
        on improving the firing end seal later in the
        program).                               .

        E) The dusty nature of the material in the cal-
        ciner created a problem, as the dust continuous-
        ly obscured the flame, tripping the-flame scanners
        on a false "flame out!l signal.  Numerous minor
        modifications were tried to resolve the problem
        such as:
        1) Changing optics on the scanners.
        2) Adding a second scanner.
        3) Installation of an air blown sight tube on the
           scanner.
        None of these provided a permanent solution.

        F) Calcined magnesia leaving the kiln contained
        a significant amount of grit, which would not
        slake when it was recycled to the absorption
        system.  This grit also caused pluggage of the
        MgO slurry lines.  A small pulverizer was ob-
        tained for test purposes in the prototype. .
        Initially installed at the Boston facility it
        was demonstrated to be capable of producing a
        usable grind.

        G) The ground regenerated MgO exhibited a low
        reactivity, causing difficulty with pH control
        and S02 removal.  This was corrected by heating
        the MgO slurry tank to 180°F to activate the
        magnesia.  Heating was accomplished with a direct
        stream sparge to the tank controlled by an appro-
        priate temperature controller.

   2.   In the second category several modifications were
accomplished in 1973:

        A) Re-routing the dryer off gas to the absorber to
        control particulate matter emissions.   The dryer
                             •-79-

-------
had originally been equipped only with cyclones
for dust control of the gas passing to the stack.
It had been predicted earlier that these would
not be suitable, however, as there was no exp-
ience with such a system, the cyclone arrangement
was investigated before arriving at the final
design.  After testing of particulate matter had
revealed a 10 gr./SCFD inlet and 1 gr./SCFD.outlet
from the cyclone, it was decided to use the absor-
ber for the final dust control.  This was accomp-
lished by installing a direct connection to the
6-1 ID Booster Fan inlet or outlet, with a damper
control to select the injection point for absorb-
er in-service or out-of-service application.

B) The pulverizer was relocated to the regenera-
tion facility and installed at the discharge of
the MgO screw conveyor (0-503).  Also installed
at the same time iwere a vibrating screen and a
magnetic separator to remove any tramp material
from the calcined MgO before it entered the
pulverizer.

C) A hammer mill was installed at the truck loading
station at Mystic to reduce oversize lumps scalped
off at the discharge of the belt conveyor (0-408).
MgSOo out-loaded to trucks from this belt contain-
ed a significant percentage of +3/4" size lumps
(10%)  that had, to this point,  been discarded.  A
chute was installed from the scalping screen to the
newly installed hammer mill.  The pulverized MgSO3
discharging from the mill was then returned to the
belt by means of a conveyor installed at the same
time.

D) External hammers were added to the feed section
of the dryer and the feed screw extended into the
dryer to eliminate adherence of material to the
shell in this area.

E) A friction seal to replace the original laby-
rinth seal was designed and installed at the firing
hood of the calciner to further reduce air leak-
age at this point.  This, coupled with the previous
                      -80-

-------
         fixes, allowed the attainment of a reducing atmosphere
         in the calciner.  Additional control of kiln operation
         was provided by the installation of a variable speed
         drive for the range 0.7 to 2 R.P.M.

         F)  A pneumatic dust conveying system to handle the
         cyclone underflow and dryer spill-back was designed and
         installed.  This finally eliminated a problem that
         occurred when adding the dry cyclone dust to the wet
         centrifuge cake being conveyed to the dryer.  These
         two materials when admixed often "set-up" and stalled
         the conveyor.

         G)  The MgO slurry system was further improved by the
         addition of a pre-mix tank at the discharge of the MgO
         weigh belt (0-103) to act as a steam seal between the
         now heated MgO slurry tank  (G-102), and the enclosure
         erected directly over the tank housing the weigh  feeder.
         This eliminated the problems associated with condensing
         water vapors in this dusty area, but created new ones
         because of frequent pluggage of the pre-mix tank.

         H)  The problem of frequent shutdowns of the calciner
         on false flame failure signals, because of the high
         dust level in the calciner, was solved by by-passing
         the flame scanning equipment.  Operator control is
         substituted for this instrumentation after the kiln
         refractory becomes heated to the ignition temperature.

         I)  Additional improvements were made in the calciner
         feed system.  A vibrating bin bottom was installed on
         G-506, and the MgS03 weight belt 0-514 changed to a
         more robust unit with faster response to varying feed
         bulk density.

     3.  in the third category, these other modifications made
were :

         A)  Conversion of the MgS03 bucket elevator (0-511) at
         the regeneration plant from a centrifugal discharge to
         a continuous machine allowing it to handle either dusty
         or granular material.

         B)  Installation of a tail gas scrubber at the acid
         plant to reduce emissions to the new standards was
         completed and the system operated.   The acid plant
                              -81-

-------
          itself  is  of  an  old  design  for  95% conversion,  and
          was  in  the process of being phased out before  the
          program started, because of the  inability of such
          plants  to  meet the new  standards of the Federal
          Clean Air  Act.   In order to continue the program in
          compliance with  these standards, a caustic  (NaOH)
          scrubbing  system incorporating a venturi absorber
          of Chemico's  special design was  installed to treat
          the  acid plant's emissions, reducing the SC>2 from
          3000 ppm to 300  ppm.

4.4. SYSTEM AVAILABILITY

     System availability  for the flue gas desulfurization
system  installed at Mystic Station is given in Table 9 which
summarizes operating time and availability  by program period
and shows the improvement in availability during the 4,127
hours of  operation  logged with the system treating flue  gas
from a  high sulfur  fired  boiler. Table 10 presents the data
on a monthly basis, with  comments on the primary causes  for
reduced availability during the planned operational testing
and continuous operation  phase which comprised the final year
of the  program.

     The  continuous operation phase  was interrupted repeatedly
by boiler outages resulting from numerous tube failures  un-
related to the FGD  system.  Because  of the  problem, the maxi-
mum duration of  continuous gas flow  to the  absorber was  limited
to a week at a time, however,  during April, May and June, two
periods of 35 and 30 days were obtained with essentially  100%
availability despite the  numerous boiler failures.  This
demonstrated the  ability  of the FGD  system  to cycle with both
load  and varying operation of the boiler.  This is shown in
Figure  15 which  depicts periods of FGD system operation,
average load during those periods and causes of absorber system
outage.

     Similar data are  not  presented for the  regeneration plant
as most outages  there  were caused by interruptions  in the Mgo
supply  and these, except  for two cases, resulted from break-
down in the transportation and trucking operation.  In the
other two instances, first the national shortage of petro-
leum products in November 1973 forced the regeneration plant
out of  service for  several weeks until this situation was
resolved and a fuel oil supply for the calciner secured; and
second, a two week  regeneration plant outage was forced by a
failure in a piece  of acid plant equipment  not related to the
calcination system.  Several problems were  encountered and


                              -82-

-------
                            TABLE 9

        FLUE GAS DESULFURIZATION SYSTEM AVAILABILITY
                    BY TEST PROGRAM PHASE
Description
Pre start-up through
Break-in period

Planned Operational
Testing
   Period
April 1972 to
May 1973

June 1973 to
February 1974
Continuous Operation*  March 1974 to
                       June 1974
Operating
  Hours   Availability
  1,127
17%
1,630
1,370
46%
76%
     * During the period 3/1/74 to the end of the
       program,  the Mystic 6 boiler only operated
       at total  of 1,721 hours because of numerous
       boiler tube failures.
                             -83-

-------
                            TABLE 10
        FLUE GAS DESULFURIZATION SYSTEM AVAILABILITY
Month
Availability
June 1973
July
August
September
October
68%
61%
—
38%
60%
              Comment
November
December
   26%
   13%
January 1974    28%
February

March

April

May


June
   25%

   87%

   81%

   57%


   80%
                            Boiler annual overhaul
                            System availability decreased
                            during the last part of the year
                            due to heavy erosion/corrosion
                            attack in the recycle slurry
                            piping syst.em.
               System availability limited by
               boiler related problems which
               caused frequent shut downs in
               January and February
Low availability in May due to
two week acid plant outage

Program termination.
                              -84-

-------



-

CD
o:
o

. -
^
21
"

f j
£-)
•-^^ J-T*-,

cr-."





0.
in









]





r
























B.
1





























~1






























*.-»






























4



{




t
i
i
*


















i





r~
























F'-l





























































—




r

!
I








t






i
|
1







1

I
-



















\
\




E






























•






r























...._
























I
!




A
; /
; \

•
|

"r

















il





BA

!




























1



|
!
1
























\






























— »





































-i
XI
3(1
ill
ill
ill

ill
III
in




i




J 	 L




B -

1
;


•~1
"













j



1





—







"

















!


























(
!
j
i
t
i




«M:







|

1
1
.


j
1





i


1





*-




































-T
























I






'I








j
|







!
|




I
















}

i






i
i



































r*

























































CODE SHUTDOWN CAUSE NO.
A FGD System 7
B Power Plant 25
C MgO Supply 1
A.


























 Jan.
Feb.
March
April
May
June
                     FIG. 15

BOSTON  ED.  OPERRT1SNS  JRN.-JJNii  1974
  FLUE GAS DESULFURIZATION SYSTEM OPERATING PERIODS AND OUTAGES

-------
solved at this plant as detailed in the foregoing section
(Sec. 4.2) on the operation, and in addition the calciner was
never run at its design capacity;  however, the supply of
regenerated magnesia was maintained at satisfactory levels
when the plants were operating as an integrated system,.
                             -86-

-------
          5.0 EQUIPMENT ARRANGEMENT AND MATERIALS
                       OF CONSTRUCTION
     Figure 16 shows the general arrangement plan for the
flue gas desulfurization system installed at Boston Edison
Company's Mystic Station and identifies the location of the
major pieces of equipment.  In the S02 absorption system,
a wide variety of conditions exist in the equipment as the
process streams range from incoming flue gas to saturated
gas streams, liquid and slurry streams, and varieties of
solid chemical compounds.  A range of acidity also exists
throughout the plant.  Figure 17 shows the general arrange-
ment of the regeneration plant at Rumford, R.I. and also
shows major equipment location.  Tables 11 and 12 list the
equipment by category, and material of construction for
both plants, comments are given if problems were encountered
with a particular item.
                             -87-

-------
i
00
00
                                         ROTARY DRYER
                            •It
D
                        Mos
                        STORAGE
                        SILO
                        r"
         -C.-J.,
          I
                                       ,-J-L-.
                                      _J *- T -,—I
                                   c;; j cbs
                                                                                            MOTHER
                                                           FIG.  16
                                                   GENERAL ARRANGEMENT-PLAN
                                SCRUBBING SYSTEM FOR 155 MW  CAPACITY AT MYSTIC  NO 6  STATION OF
                                                      BOSTON  EDISON COMPANY
UJ C
_l 	
u

/ p", BELT CONVEYOR





n
ll








0
I O
L»A
t
                                                                                                           TRUCKS
                                                                                                      \   \
                                                                                                       O
                                                                                                       I

-------
                                                                                                              VENTUPI
                                                                                                              hCRUBBE.R-
                                                                                                              COOLEH      FUEL OIL TANK
 I
00
VD
 I
                                                                                                                                        ACID
                                                                                                                                        PLANT
                                                           GENERAL ARRANGEMENT-PLAN
                                          CALCINER PLANT  AT  ESSEX CHEMICAL co. RUMFORD RHODE ISLAND

-------
                                             TABLE 11
1-101
J-101
                                          EQUIPMENT PERFORMANCE

                                     FLUE GAS DESULFURIZATION SYSTEM
Code
No.       Equipment

D-401     Combustion Chamber
G-102    MgO Makeup Tank
G-301     Mother Liquor Tank
          MgO Makeup Pumps
J-201     Recycle Pumps

J-301     Mother Liquor Pump

K-201     ID Booster Fans


K-401     Dryer ID Fan

K-402     Dryer FD Fan
                                             Material Of
                                             Construction

                                             Refractory Lined
                                             Carbon Steel
                                             Carbon Steel
                                              Carbon Steel
          MgO Storage Bin & Dust Collector    Carbon Steel
Cast Iron
                                              Cast Iron

                                              Cast Iron

                                              Carbon Steel Wheel
                                              Mild Steel Case

                                              Carbon Steel

                                              Carbon Steel
Comment

Two outages resulted from a failure of the
burner block and resultant failure of the
refractory lining adjacent to it.

Steam sparging of the tank and a pre-mix
unit were added; an 18 in. standpipe was
also added at the outlet nozzle after plugging
of the outlet of the vessel by MgO lumps.

Satisfactory Operation

Satisfactory Operation

Severe erosion of impellers and casing was
experienced.

Severe erosion of pumps was experienced.

Some impeller erosion was experienced.

Some corrosion of case was corrected by
precrete lining the lower half of the case.

Satisfactory Operation

Satisfactory Operation

-------
                                              TABLE 11  CONT'D
Code
No.

M-101

M-301

O-101
          Equipment

          MgO Tank Agitator

          Mother Liquor Tank Agitator

          MgO Conveyor
O-102     MgO Vibrating Hopper

O-103     MgO Weighing System


O-401     Dryer



O-402     Dryer Conveyor



O-403    MgSO3 Conveyor #1


O-404     MgSO3 Elevator
Material Of
Construction

304 SS wetted parts

304 SS wetted parts

Aluminum Straight
Tube SS Bend

Carbon Steel
                                             Carbon Steel
                                             Carbon Steel
                                              Carbon Steel
                                              Carbon Steel
Comment

Satisfactory Operation

Satisfactory Operation

A hole developed in the bend after one year
of service.

Satisfactory Operation

Frequent shutdowns caused by jamming of the
weigh control mechanism and belt.

Numerous problems primarily of a process
nature caused by adherance of centrifuge
cake to dryer walls.

Frequent shutdowns caused by hardening  of
centrifuge cake with subsequent jamming
of the unit and wear of the unit.

Occasional large lumps from dryer jammed
conveyor.

Satisfactory service except for one outage
because of a bearing failure on the drive
spocket.

-------
                                             TABLE .IICONT'D
Code
No.

O-405

O-406
Equipment

MgSOg Conveyor #2

MgSO3 Weigh Feeder
O-407     MgSO3 Screw Feeder

O-408     MgSO3 Belt Conveyor



O-409     Dust Feeder


R-402     Dust Collector
                                              Material Of
                                              Construction

                                              Carbon Steel
                                              Carbon Steel

                                              Rubberized Belt,
                                              Conventional drive
                                              mechanism

                                              Carbon Steel
                                              Carbon Steel
Comment

Eliminated from material handling train.

Eliminated from material handling train
after numerous  failures.

Satisfactory Service

Trouble free operation, however, dusty nature
of feed created secondary clean up problem.
                                                           Entire dryer dust handling system was re-
                                                           vised as part of dryer modifications.

                                                           Trouble free operation except for some in-
                                                           stances of packing of collected dust in hopper
                                                           after failure of O-409.
R-301     Centrifuge
                                     Carbon Steel
                                                                    See Sec.  5. 2.

-------
                                                     TABLE  12
   Code"' •-- ;;
   No.

   E=501A,B

   F-502

   G-501
£ G-505
   G-507

   G-508

   1-502

   J-050A, B

   J-501A.B

   J-502A, B
Equipment

Weak Acid Cooler

Weak Acid Stripping Tower

Weak-'Acid Pump Tank


Coke Feed Bin

M;gS'o3:;Feed Bin

 •, ••: • -i f , •• !/>_

Bearing Water Pump Tank
 ' '*•'-.:.  -  i

Air Receiver
 ; :.,--)•,'.••. ."!
MgO Silo

R e cy'cle Water Pumps

Calcirier Fuel Oil Pumps

Weak Acid Circulating Pumps
                                              EQUIPMENT PERFORMANCE

                                              REGENERATION SYSTEM
Material Of
Construction

316 SS

Chemical Stoneware

Reinforced Fiberglass Poly-
ester.

Carbon Steel

Carbon Steel
Carbon Steel

Carbon Steel

Carbon Steel

Alloy 20

Cast Iron

Alloy 20
Comments

Satisfactory Service

Satisfactory Service


Satisfactory Service

Satisfactory Service

Plugging problem corrected by in-
stallation of a vibrating bin bottom.

Satisfactory Service.  •

Satisfactory Service

Satisfactory Service

Satisfactory Service

Satisfactory Service

Satisfactory Service

-------
                                               TABLE 12CONT'D
Code
No.

J-503
J-504

K-501

O-503

O-504
O-505

O-506

O-508
Equipment

Neutralizing Pump


Bearing Water Pump

Calciner F.D. Fan

MgO Conveyor #1

MgO Elevator
MgO Conveyor #2

MgO Vibrating Hopper

MgO Weigh Feeder
O-509,O-510MgSO3 Conveyor #1

0-511       MgS03 Elevator
Material Of
Construction

Natural Rubber Lined
Cast Iron



Carbon Steel

Carbon Steel
Carbon Steel

Carbon Steel
                                  Carbon Steel

                                  Carbon Steel
Comments

Rubber swelled and bound pump
after two years operation.

Satisfactory Service

Satisfactory Service

Frequent hanger bearing failure.

Wear of sprockets and chain
experienced after 18 months unit
converted to continuous discharge
type.

Satisfactory Service^

Satisfactory Service

Eliminated from material handling
train after numerous failures.

Problems limited to bearing failures.

Frequent break downs required shaft
size increase.

-------
                                    TABLE 12CONT'D
Code
No.

O-512

O-513



O-514



O-515

O-516

O-523



P-075

R-401


R-501



R-020
Equipment

Calciner Conveyor

Calciner Elevator



MgSO3 Weigh Feeder



Coke Weigh Feeder

Cyclone Dust Feeder

MgSOg Airveyor



Cyclone Dust Collector

Fuel Oil Supply & Combustion
Equipment.

Calciner



WA Venturi Scrubber
Materials Of
Construction

Carbon Steel

Carbon Steel
Carbon Steel
316 SS
Carbon Steel,  Refractory
lined
316 SS
Comments

Satisfactory  Service

Unit converted to continuous discharge
type, bucket fastening bolts failed due
to corrosion.

Numerous failures, unit replaced by
a BIF unit reducing the  number of
break downs.

Belt tracking problems.

Satisfactory  Service

Frequent  pluggage due to tramp
material and lumps in transported
MgS03.

Satisfactory  Service

Problem of unsuitable flame failure
control.

A two foot wide section  of the re-
fractory lining loosened and failed,
pinion gear failed after  two years.

Occasional pluggage due to formation
of elemental sulfur.

-------
5.1  ABSORBER SYSTEM AREAS SUBJECT TO CORROSIVE ATTACK

     Carbon steel is the principal material of construction of
the unit but because of S02 absorption, the carbon steel must
be protected,  in some cases stainless can be substituted in
the internal structure, but here the corrosion-problem can be
influenced by the amount of chlorides in the recycle stream
 (Table 13).  Since temperatures in the FGD System are normally
low, (the adiabatic saturation temperature of the gas) as long
as scrubbing liquor is present, the carbon steel structural and
other parts of the venturi absorber were protected by about 60
mils of glass reinforced polyester resins.  This material was
chosen over stainless as the concentration of chlorides in the
absorber slurry could increase up to a point where Austenitic
stainless steels are susceptible to stress cracking and sulfuric
attack in the presence of high cloride causes alloys like type
316 to pit excessively.

     Some wear was experienced in the absorber during the
twenty-seven months' operation of the plant.  The extent of
this wear was minor, limited to the erosion of the top coat
of the two layer application of the FRP liner, and the erosion
of the steel apex of the toroidal ring.

     The pattern of the erosion of the torus indicated it
occurred in the areas of over-lap of the adjacent irrigation
sprays.  Repair was easily accomplished by welding an angle
section over the damaged areas of the torus.  This can be seen
in Figure 18 which shows (from left to right) the inner core,
first slot, torus, second slot, part of the converging wall,
and the tips of two spray nozzles.

     The shaded areas on the converging section of inner wall
are the underlayer of the FRP liner.  The patched area of the
torus is visible.

     The polypropylene chevron modules, used for mist elimina-
tors, have shown no corrosion problems, nor have the plastic
beams used to hold them down.  The upper surface of these
modules is shown in Figure 19.

     Recycle pumps and piping have been subject to extensive
wear of an erosive-corrosive type.  This was particularly
serious in areas of high velocity and turbulence.  The recycle
pumps were originally all carbon steel.  Figure 20 shows the
                             -96-

-------
                 TABLE 13
          CHLORIDE ANALYSIS
Scrubber Slurry (11/16/73)




Magnesium, Oxide (New)




Magnesium Oxide (Regenerated)
CHLORIDE %




   0. 21%




   0.16 - 0.18




   0.0
Process Water (Avg. 1972)




Process Water (12/6/73)




Process Water (12/7/73)
   CHLORIDE (PPM)




   10. 4 PPM




   7.8   PPM




   3. 4  PPM
                        -97-

-------
         Fig. 18
VENTURI THROAT AREA WEAR
         Fig. 19
   DE1MISTER MODULES
            -98-

-------
                  Kig.  20
RECYCLE PU.MP IIVIPELI ,ER WEAR

                  -99-

-------
condition of the carbon steel impellers after one year of
service.  The impellers, suction plates, and other parts
of the pumps were replaced in stainless steel, where avail-
able;  however, these were also subject to wear when used
in the slurry service.

     Similar wastage of metal due to abrasion was experienced
in the MgO slurry pumps.  Leaks also developed in sections
of the distribution piping of the recycle lines shown in
Figure 21.  A sample was cut from a larger diameter header
pipe which had welded to it, in a horizontal plane a smaller
4-1/2 inch diameter pipe and sent to L. Pitkin, Inc.,
analysts and metallurgists, for evaluation.  This pipe had
been weld repaired where it had holed through on a prior
occasion.  In the sample submitted there were two holes,
approximately opposite each other near the weld joint, at
an angle of about 45° to the cylindrical axis of the larger
pipe.

     The following is a report of the examination.

     (Figure 22 is a photograph of the T-section sample as
received, viewed so as to show one of the areas where the
smaller pipe had holed through).

     "The outer surface of the."sample showed flaked paint
and rust staining,  and except for the holes,  appeared to be
in sound condition.  The inner surface of the sample was
examined and it was observed that there was extensive, severe
deterioration at the weld .joint.  The deterioration diminshed
proceeding away from the joint towards the flame-cut end of
the small pipe.  Deterioration was concentrated for about
180 degrees on one side.  The other side was, by comparison,
relatively sound.

    "Further examination showed the I.D. of the small pipe
to have thinned rather gradually and uniformly on one side
as revealed by a cross-section cut about five inches from
the weld joint.  There were no accompanying irregularities
as were present near the weld joint.  The cut cross-section
is shown in Figure 23.

    "Microspecimens were prepared through the deteriorated
area of side A of the small pipe.  The material at the I0D.
merely showed smooth undulations with no corrosion penetra-
tion.  The microstructure was comprised of pearlite and
                           -100-

-------
                                            ••'
            Fig. 21
RECYCLE PIPE-UPPER SECTION
               .-101 -

-------
o
•• '

                             r" SECTION OF RECYCLE LINE
                                                FIG.  22.

-------


         Fig. 23
'  CROSS SECTION OF RECYCLE

-------
 ferrite  in  a  slightly  acicular or needle-like pattern  charac-
 teristic of normalized medium carbon  steel  (estimated  0.25%
 carbon).  Figure  24  is a photomicrograph  at  100X  showing  the
 general  microstructure and  I.D. profile in the deteriorated
 area where  the wall  had been considerably reduced.

    "The rust and corrosion product on the I.D0 surface of
 the pipe was  leached with distilled water and checked  for
 acidity  by  acid test paper. The results indicated a pH of
 from 6 to 7 - virtually neutral.  The leachings were further
 checked  for sulfites and sulfates which,  if  present, would
 be acidic in  nature  and, of course, could progressively
 .attack the  carbon steel.  The results were negative -  neither
 sulfates  nor  sulfites  being found.

    "it  would appear that any sulfate or  sulfite  compounds
 that were present on the inner surface had been washed away
 in subsequent operation or  perhaps converted to water  soluble
 compounds and so  not detected.  In any event, the inner ;
 surface  of  the T-sample was in a potentially uncorrosive
 condition with respect to the slurry handled at the time
 it was received.

    "The  deterioration sustained was only in the  small dia-
 meter pipe.   This  was  a thinning on one side of the pipe
 diminishing towards  its. discharge end.  The  large diameter  .
pipe was virtually unaffected.   This condition,  in the
metallurgist's opinion, was the result of inlet end impinge-
ment erosion.   Liquid  flow over the sharp 90-degree change ;
in direction  into  the  smaller diameter discharge pipe  line
causes eddies  and whirls due to the abrupt change in flow
direction and increased velocity.   The result is that there
is a mechanical erosion effect accompanied by differential
aeration of the solution with attendant formation of galvanic
oxygen concentration cells which leads to an accelerated
deterioration as observed."

     The recycle line wall thickness was  gauged using ultra-
sonic testing revealing that there had been general corrosion
throughout  the system.   A possible cause  of  the corrosion is
the presence of the bisulfite ion (HS03)  which persists up to
a pH of 8.3 (Figure 25) i.e.,  above the normal system oper-
ating pH.  Another contributing factor for corrosion were
short periods  of low pH excursion which occurred during the
course of the  program because of control  upset.
                           -104-

-------
                                   March 4, 1974
                                   M-3070
          fi^M^^fM^^^
            V-
                     FIG. 24
           MICROSTRUCTURE AT I.D. SURFACE -
                DETERIORATED AREA
100 X
       Photomicrograph of longitudinal section through deteriorated
area, side A, of small diameter pipe showing general microstructure of
ferrite and pearlite. The I.D. surface profile (top) shows a smooth
undulating profile with no corrosion penetrations and absence of any
oxide scale build-up.
steel.
       The microstructure is normal for a plain medium carbon
                         -105-

-------
                                            CURVE.
en
i
                11
                               MgO
                                          25  30   35   40   45   So
                                                                              2 ^

-------
5.2   CENTRIFUGE  SYSTEM

        Sections of the centrifuge are also subject to wear
and in this case it appeared that abrasion was the cause of
wastage of metal.  The parts of the machine which were most
affected were the replaceable items such as bowl plows, and
conveyor flights. The unit, of carbon steel construction,
had the conveyor flights originally edged with Colmonqy #6.
After the first 14 months of intermittent service, the
machine was disassembled and inspected with the following
observations:

     Conveyor Blades         .                •

     Conveyor blades were found to be worn an average of
3/32" in the cylindrical section to a maximum of an average
1" in the conical section.  Conveyor blades were worn thin -
in the areas adjacent to the feed ports.  Badly worn blade
segments were replaced and the blade areas adjacent to the
feed ports were covered with J alloy.  Conveyor blades were
built up and re-hardsurfaced with Colmonoy #6, which was
the original hardsurfacing alloy.

     Product Build-Up

     It was determined upon inspection that the out-of-balance
problems reported were probably caused by build-up of solids
in the drain compartment of the conveyor hub.  Virtually all
surfaces of the bowl and conveyor had a significant build-up
of hardened solids resembling concrete,  in order to minimize
solids this build-up in the conveyor hub drain compartment,
a tube was installed to blank-off this zone^  All accessible
surfaces of the bowl and conveyor were then covered with
Tropolite plastic coating to provide a smooth corrosion
resistant surface.

     Bowl Head, Bowl Head Plows & Wiper Beads

     Considerable wear was evident in the solids discharge
area.  The hardfaced product wiper beads on the bowl head
periphery were worn off and the bowl head flange had worn
approximately 1/2" radially.  The bowl head solids plows
evidenced considerable wear. The bowl head was repaired and
the wiper beads were replaced and an additional eight (8)
beads were applied.  Two of the solids plows were replaced
                           -107-

-------
by the larger diameter case plows and the remainder of the
bowl head plows were re-hardsurfaced arid reinstalled.

     The above summary while not complete does highlight
the important steps taken to improve the reliability of the
equipment.

     As noted, the conveyor was re-hardsurfaced with the
original (Colmonoy) metal, as were the bowl head plows.
Two of the solid plows were replaced with larger diameter
case plows and the machine returned to service.  The hard-
surfacing was touched up in October 1973, when the machine
was disassembled for repair to its feed pipe and the installa-
tion of additional wash nozzles.

     The machine was again opened and inspected in January
1974 and wear was still evident in the conveyor (Figure 26).
It was hardsurfaced with Stellite II and remained in service
until the end of the program.

     Total time daring which the centrifuge was fed .in the
periods is summarized'in the following table:

                           TABLE 14

Start	      Finish        Hours Fed Equivalent Days

April 1972       June 1973        1127          48.9

August 29,  1973  Sept.  25, 1973    215.5         9

Sept. 30, 1973   Jan. 28, 1974     818.6        34.1

Feb. 19,  1974    June 26, 1974    1448.1        60.3

     A plot of the conveyor wear is given in Figure 28, which
graphically shows the similarity of wear patterns with the
feed to the machine entering between blade 14 and 15.  It is
also evident that the Stellite II applied in the latter part
of the program gave improved service (blade wear would have
to exceed two inches before a significant reduction in
efficiency would be experienced).  Based on the rate of
wear for the period February through June 1974, it appears
that over one year of continuous operation would be obtained
                           -108-

-------
        I
                                     Centrifuge Conveyor
                                         (Jan.,  1974)

                                     Showing Flight Wear
       FIGURE 26
  Centrifuge Conveyor
     (Jan., 1974)

Showing Scale Build-up
      on Flights
                                          FIGURE 27
                         -109-

-------
   BIRD   CENTRIFUGE
 CONVEYOR  BLADE   WEAR
cL
<
LU
LU
D
<
_J
cD
    12.
      O
                   10      15"
                    BLADE MS.
 IS     30     45     fcO     TF
IMCHE5 FROM  50LID3 D15CHARG-E
        Fig. 28
                                  SCALE -
                     -110-

-------
before  the  conveyor would have to be  repaired.

5.3  STACK

     The  existing Mystic #6  stack handled  dryer off gas
for  an  eight month period in addition to the  flue gas.
The  stack was brick lined, with  concrete outer shell,  335'
high with 15' inside  diameter at the  base  of  the inner stack.
It is designed  to withstand  saturated,  acidic gases with  the
inner stack constructed of solid shale brick  laid up  in a
potassium silicate mortar  (Corlock).   The  recommended pH
range of the mortar is 1 to 7 where  there is no submergence,
and  1 to  5.5 where there is  submergence or heavy liquor flow.

     The  stack  was inspected on  several occasions.  The first
inspection, prior to  redirecting the  dryer-off gas to the
absorber, revealed several inches of  build-up of solid mag-^
nesia salts in  the stack.  These were washed  off in a clean-
down of the stack and no significant  deterioration of the
brick work  or mortar  was observed after the washing.  After
the  dryer off-gas was treated in the  absorber with the flue gas
there was no reoccurrence of  the problem.

     On a second occasion, the inner  stack was observed
to be leaning and touching the outer  shell at its top where
a  ten foot  vertical section  of the  inner brick stack had
cracked.   (During this period construction of Unit 7 was
underway, including pile driving in the area  immediately
adjacent  to the absorption plant and  stack).

     After  the  dryer-off gas was redirected to the absorber,
consideration was given to reheating  the treated flue gas.
However,  inspection had shown no evidence  of  deterioration
of the  stack due to the condensing  liquor  (Table 15), and
there was no observation of  "raining" from the stack during
operations  with the S02 Absorption  System.  No reheat was
provided  for the flue gas except for  that  resulting from
the mixing of the small portion of untreated gas during the
last four months of operation.

5.4  REGENERATION SYSTEM

     With few exceptions, the materials of construction
selected  for the calciner installation  proved to be entirely
satisfactory.,   Problems listed below  resulted from operating
                            -111-

-------
                       TABLE 15




              STACK DRAININGS ANALYSIS









               6/13/73           7/17/73            7/18/73




Load           145 MW           145 MW            145 MW




pH             4.1               4.3                3.3




SO4(As MgSO4) 13.3%              7.0%              5.3%




Ni             0.01%         .    0.004%            0.003%




R2O3*         0.12%             0.18%             0.22%
 *R2°3
                      -112-

-------
conditions which were not anticipated in the original de-
sign.

     All material handling equipment for the dry solids,
both feed and product, are of carbon steel.  No corrosion
problems were experienced, with the exception of the coke
bin.  The coke originally purchased contained from 10% to
17% free moisture.  Since coke was seldom used, some scaling
took place on the walls of the coke bin.  Even so, the
problem was not one of deterioration of the bin, but rather
that scale would occasionally break off in large pieces and
cause malfunctions of the coke feeder.

     No corrosion problems were observed in the calciner
elevator despite the fact that it would frequently become
wet with condensate from combustion gases.   This occurred
 when the calciner was not being  fed but. the burner  was
 kept on to maintain.temperature.

     The gas duct between the calciner and the venturi
scrubber was constructed of Type 310 stainless steel in
anticipation of high exit gas temperatures.  The venturi
scrubber itself was constructed of Type 316 stainless steel.
Both these areas were subject to corrosion under certain
conditions.  In places where moist solids would accumulate
there was considerable corrosion.  This was evidenced by
numerous perforations in the convolutions of the Type 310
expansion joints, in the bottom portion of horizontal or
inclined runs of the Type 310 ducts, and in the Type 316
sampling system for the analyzer monitoring the oxygen
content of the calciner exit gas.  However, if the metal
surface was clean and dry, or if it was constantly washed
with a liquid stream as in the scrubber, no corrosion was
experienced.

     The gas duct from the venturi scrubber to the acid
plant drying towers was constructed of fiberglass rein-
forced polyester and was satisfactory.

     The first 40 feet of the calciner was lined with 9 inch
of high alumina (70%) fire brick, and the remaining 80 feet
with 6 inches of high duty kiln block, backed with 2% inches
of insulating brick.  The high alumina brick showed no evi-
dence of degradation.  The kiln block suffered only a few
                           -113-

-------
spalled corners, except in the area located from 25 feet
to 40 feet from the feed end.  In this area, considerable
spalling of the face of the block took place.  It is pos-
sible that in this area, most of the combined moisture is
released from the feed.  In this case, the face of the
lining is subjected to rapid temperature fluctuations as
feed is introduced or stopped, or as the moisture content
of the feed changes.

     The insulating brick behind the block was relatively
soft.  On two occasions, one or more rings of block fell
out and considerable wear was found on the insulating brick,

     This wear allowed the block to move outward toward
the shell.

5.5  CORROSION SAMPLES

     Coupons of various metals and coatings were placed in
the system at the initiation of testing in a program of
evaluation of materials of construction.  Results for two
of these test racks are given below:

     1)    A test rack of various metals was immersed in
          the venturi absorber basin and removed after
          approximately eight months of exposure.  Table
          16 shows the corrosion rates measured.

     2)    A test rack of coupons with various coatings
          was immersed in the mother liquor tank, an
          environment similar to Item 1 above.  The
          results of the test, after the coated speci-
          mens had been immersed for an eight month
          period is given in Table 17.
                            -114-

-------
                        TABLE   16
                CORROSION TEST DATA
Corrosive Media


Location Of Specimens

Type of Test

Temperature


Test Duration
Magnesium oxide slurry scrubbing liquor for SO2
removal from power plant flue gas.

Immersed in venturi scrubber liquid.

Field  Aeration.  Moderate Agitation.  Moderate

F Avg   120    Min   100   Max   140
C Avg     49   Min    38  Max    60    File. 603

From  12/5/72  To 7/31/73   Total Days  238
Material

SS EB 26 1

Incoloy Alloy 825

Inconel Alloy 625

Armco 22-13-5

Allegheny Ludlum 6X

Hastelloy Alloy G

Hastelloy Alloy G

Titanium

SS Type 216

SS Type 317

Carpenter 20 CB-3

Durimet 20
Corrosion
Rate
(MPY)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Maximum
Pit Depth
(MILS)
5







INC IP
INC IP
INC IP
INCIP
                              -115-

-------
                        TABLE 16 (CONT'D)
                 CORROSION TEST DATA
Material

SS Type 316L

Hastelloy Alloy C-276

SS Cast  Grade CF8M

Moriel Alloy 400

Steel HSLA USS COR TEN

Steel AISI Type 1010
Corrosin
Rate
(MPY)

 0.0

 0.0

 0.0

 5.0

20.1

20.2
Maximum
Pit Depth
(MILS)
INC IP



13

PERF 40
                         -116-

-------
               TABLE 17 - RESULTS OF COATED SPECIMENS FROM CORROSION SPOOL
                          IN MOTHER LIQUOR BETWEEN CENTRIFUGE & PUMP
TYPE COATING              GMS

CEILCOTE 103 PRIME       -.20
  +252 T. C.

CEILCOTE 103               0

CEILCOTE 252             -.16

VAL CHEM TAR COAT      -.39
HI BUILD VINYL            -.02
HI BUILD EPOXY           -.19

CARBOGLAS (FIBER
 GLASS & POLYESTER)     -.46
POLYURETHANE           -.35

CARBON STEEL            -16. 28

LOCKPRIME - TUFCHEM    -.38
   MEMBRANE
COMMENTS

EVIDENCE OF ABRASION AND SOME SLIGHT ATTACK, NOT AS
GOOD AS FLAKELINE 103 ALONE.

NO EVIDENCE OF ATTACK

EVIDENCE OF ABRASION AND SOME SLIGHT ATTACK.

COATING PENETRATED ON SIDES OF SPECIMENT BUT NOT ON
END WHERE THEY APPLIED HEAVIER COAT.

VINYL COATING UNATTACKED.  EVIDENCE OF CREVICE
CORROSION UNDER TEFLON SPACERS.

SOME STAINING AND OBVIOUS CORROSION ATTACK.
SOME GLASS OBVIOUSLY MISSING.  SPECIMEN SMOOTH INSTEAD
OF ROUGH LIKE CEILCOTE COATINGS.

COATING SHOWS HEAVY ATTACK.

BADLY SCALED   AND HEAVILY ATTACKED.

SOFT LIKE RUBBER,  COATING CRACKED AND WORN AWAY, ALSO
CREVICE CORROSION.

-------
                   TABLE 17CONTINUED - RESULTS OF COATED SPECIMENS FROM CORROSION SPOOL
                          	IN MOTHER LIQUOR BETWEEN CENTRIFUGE & PUMP	
oo
    TYPE COATING

    PLASITE 4000
    (VINYL ESTER)

    URETHANE
    ELASTOMER
  GMS
+ .29
-.09
    CYANAPRENE ST-4808      +.04
    (ELASTOMERIC URETHANE)
    CARBON STEEL
    GLASS REINFORCED
    VINYL ESTER
-18.33
-.01
COMMENTS

PICKED UP CONSIDERABLE FLY ASH WHICH WOULD NOT
DESTROY COATING.  COATING INTACT.

SOME STAINING AND CHIPPING OF COATING AT EDGES,
REST IN GOOD SHAPE.

EDGES OF SPECIMEN WAS NOT COATED.  COATING NOT
ATTACHED BUT DOES NOT SHOW STAIN.

HEAVY SCALE AND WASTING AWAY OF SPECIMEN. ALMOST
20% MISSING FROM CORROSION.

ATTACK ON ONE SIDE ONLY. OTHER SIDE STILL SHOWS
MACHINING MARKS.

-------
                    6.0  PROCESS CHEMISTRY
     Pulverized solid magnesium oxide  is  introduced into a
mixing tank where water is added  and conversion to the hy-
droxide commences.  The mixture is  added  as  a slurry to the
recycle stream of the venturi  absorber to contact flue gas
containing sulfur oxides and products  of  combustion;  The
reactions between magnesium hydroxide  and sulfur dioxide
produce principally magnesium  sulfite.

     The following series of reactions characterizes the
principal ones of the process:

 MgO Slaking:
 MgO(s)+H20(l) 		*-Mg(OH)2(s)                        (6-1)

 Mg(OH)2(s)  -      3~ Mg(OH)2 (Soln)                    (6-2)
 Mg(OH)2 (Soln)	•*- Mg++ + 2 OH""                      (6-3)
 S02 Absorbtion:
 S02(g) 	-	-  >- S02 (Soln)                         (6-4a)

 S02 (Soln)+H20	 ->• H2S03                             (6-4b)

 S02 (g} +H20 		•>• H2S03                             (6-4)
 Formation of MgSOs
 H2S03   	-	 >-H+ + HS03                         (6-5)

 H S0~              »- H+ + SOf                         (6-6)

 Mg(HS03)2+2H20 •—'••>  Mg++ + 20H~+2H+  + 2HS03          (6~7)

 MgS03xH20+2H20    -^ Mg++ + 20H~ + 2H+ + SOf + XH20   (6-8)

 X = 3 or 6
 Other Reactions:
 C02(g)+H20        >- H2C03                             (6-9)

 H2C03    	  >- H C03~ + H+                    (6-10)

 H C03~		->- COf  + H+                       (6-11)

 Mg C03.5H20	^Mg++ + C0~3 + 5H20              (6-12)

 H20      --         >- H+ + OH~                        (6-13)
                             -119-

-------
     Kerr  (if has presented  the magnesia  system  equilibrium
composition  for  a system  at  125°F  as  follows:

     Component                   Molality

     HS03~                       5.045.x  10~5

     H+                          2.416 x  10~4

     S03=                        2.182 x  10"3

     Mg++                        2.452 x  10~2

     HCO ~                       3.876 x  10~2

     C03=                        2.920 x  10-3

     H S03                       8.370 x  10~12

     H2C03                       1.108 x  10~4

     OH~                         3.808 x  10~5

                                               -11
     Sulfur dioxide partial pressure  1.651 x 10   atm.

     Carbon dioxide partial pressure  6.493 x 10  atm.

     Thus, from reactions  (6-7) and (6-8) the SO,, removal
process is essentially an acid-base reaction, and the re-
action in the liquid phase will be very rapid and almost
quantitative.

     While other side reactions take  place the most signi-
ficant are those which produce magnesium  sulfate:

     MgO+S03+7H20  	»- Mg S04 •7H20  (10-14)
     Mg S03+1/202+7H20	*-  Mg S04 •7H20  (10-15)

6.1  EFFECTS OF THE PROPERTIES OF MgO ON  THE PROCESS

     From equations (6-1) -  (6-8),  it is  seen that the pro-
cess depends on the formation of Mg   and OH  ions and sub-
sequent neutralization of sulfurous acid.  The formation of
Mg++ and OH~ ions, however, is dependent  upon the hydration

    *See Section 11, References.

                            -120-

-------
characteristics of solid MgO.  A recent paper (2) on the
hydration of MgO has shown that the rate controlling step
is the removal of solid Mg(OH)2 particles from the surface
of the solid MgO.  In agreement (3) with the above, both
MgO and Mg(OH)2 of similar surface area have been shown to
react at the same rate with aqueous C02•

     The above conclusion is only valid, however, when the
MgO is in a reasonably active form.  The other factor which
affects the process is the particle size of MgO.  Not only
do the finer particles react faster, but also being smaller,
they remain suspended for longer periods of time and thus
have a better chance to react with S02»

6.1.1  Pulverization

     Early attempts to use calcined magnesia in the absorp-
tion system without any intermediate processing were un-
successful.  The product MgO, as it exited the kiln coolers,
was gritty and contained a small percentage of agglomerates.
When this material was added as a slurry, it settled rapid-
ly with the result that the MgO slurry pumps and lines
plugged.  Finally the lack of a fine dispersion of magnesia
caused further problems with pH control.

     A small, high speed hammermill (Micro Pulverizer 2DH)
was installed first at Boston and, after a brief trial
period, was moved to the regeneration facility where it was
installed to pulverize the calciner product.

     Several varieties of screens and hammers were tried
in this unit and two of the screen types were moderately
successful in producing a satisfactory pulverized product.
There were herringbone pattern screens and jump gap screens.
Neither type had a satisfactory service life as would be
expected with the abrasive regenerated magnesia.

     Herringbone pattern screens had a service life of 4 to
8 hours.  The jump gap screens gave better service as did
hard faced hammers and lined head plates.  Average replace-
ment times are as follows:
                           -121-

-------
          Jump Gap Screens       185 hours

          Hammers                1500 hours

          Head Plates            230 hours

     Table  18 shows the size distribution before and after
pulverization of the regenerated magnesia as well as the
distribution of the unpulverized calciner product.

6.1.2  Hydration of MgO

     Digestion of MgO in water resulted in slaking of the
MgO and formation of Mg(OH)2 which subsequently reacts with
S02 •  The conditions necessary for efficient slaking of re-
generated MgO were investigated in the laboratory using the
S02 utilization test (Appendix C ) developed to monitor
calciner operation.  The effect of digestion temperature
using this same test is given in Table 19, while the rate
of hydration for various samples treated at 180°F in water
given in Table 20.

6.2  SYSTEM pH AND S02  ABSORPTION

     From equations (6-5) and (6-6) it is seen that the for-
mation of solid MgS03 is dependent on the pH of the ab-
sorbing system.  It is also evident from the pK values of
Oo,
~2 i
       Table 21, that sulfurous acid  (considering the
S03~2 ion) is a weaker acid than acetic acid.

     Coupled with this is the fact that alkaline-earth
sulfites dissolve readily (4) in moderately strong acids
(even in sulfurous acid) .  Thus pH values near 7 were select-
ed for operation.

     Because of the weakly acidic character of sulfurous
acid, the salts, especially alkali and alkaline-earths,
are hydrolyzed in solution and consequently the sulfites
are alkaline in nature.

     Titrations of S02 in water by MgO and Mg (OH) 2 suspen-
sions support the above conclusion, i.e., for more than 90%
removal the pH of the final suspension should be above 7.
                           -122-

-------
                             TABLE 18
                     DRY SCREEN ANALYSIS
Screen
Size (Tyler)
+50

+100
Unpulverized
Calciner Product

       A

      30.3

     18.1
Pulverized Calciner Product
Herring Bone
   Screen
     B
    39.1
Jump Gap
 Screen
   C

   5.3

   9.5
+200

+325

-325
      9.4

     13.1

     29.1
     9.4

     3.3

    48.2
   8.8

  49.8

   26.6
                                -123-

-------
                             TABLE 19

        EFFECT OF TEMPERATURE OF DIGESTION OF MgO

                   ON SO2 REMOVAL CAPACITY
Sample
MgO, 97.4%
B/D 46.40#/ft.
MgO, 97. 35%
MgSO4, 0.50
B/D 68#/ft. 3
Treatment
a.  Untreated.
b.  Digested at 160°F
   for 45 mins.
c.  Digested at 180°F
    for 45 mins.

a.  Untreated
b.  Digested at 180°F
    for 1/2  hr.
c.  Digested at 180°F
    for 1 hr.
d.  Digested at 210°F
    for 1/2  hr.
 S02
Efficiency

    20

    50

    72

    22

    42

    49

    45
                               -124-

-------
Time in
Minutes
Ul
I
15


30


45


60


90


120
                                              TABLE  20


                           RATE OF HYDRATION OF MgO at 180°F. in WATER:  10% SLURRY


MgO (AR)
MgO 94.47
SOs, eff. 60.00
% MgO after
Hydration
79.50
74.82
72.32
70.96
69.36
68.65





% of
Hydration
48.20
64.27
71.32
75.70
80.85
83.14
R-1616
B/D 14.00
MgO 88. 36
MgSO4 2. 80
SO 2 eff. 44
% MgO after
Hydration
71.79
67.18
66.36
65.68
64.47
64. 45
o




% of
Hydration
53.35
68.20
70.81
73.03
76.92
76.99
R-1310
B/D 43.00
MgO 90.58
MgSO4 4. 98
SO9 eff. 30.00
% MgO after
Hydration
90.61
90.00
89.34
89.08
88.51
86.55





% of
Hydration
0.00
1.96
4.09
4.93
6.76
13.07

-------
                  TABLE 21

                               Ka            pKa
                                          f-\

H2S03	*- H+ + H S03~       1.54 x  10~   1.82

                      O                   "7
H 803"	*-H+ + S03~         1.02 x  10~   6.91



For comparison the pK values of other  acids  are:

                      _         pKa

H2C03 	*- H  + HC03          6TT7



H C03~		*- H+ + C03~2        10.25



Acetic Acid                     4.75
                      -126-

-------
6.2.1  S02 Absorption

     The absorption of gas in a venturi device follows con-
ventional mass transfer principles.  In the venturi ab-
sorber used in this work, flue gas containing SC>2 enters
the converging section of the vessel and is accelerated
towards the throat area, passing over surfaces which are
irrigated by the absorbant slurry.  The moving gas creates
a wave motion on the liquid surface until, at a critical
velocity, the forces resulting from the frequency and
amplitude of the waves exceeds the cohesive  (surface tension,
etc.) forces of the liquid,  When this occurs, some portion
of the wave is detached and dispersed into the gas stream.

     The liquid, dispersed as droplets into the gas stream,
provides the media for absorption.  The equation for point
efficiency,
 (1-E)  =
             ™
             502 f

= exp
                          -Kg a
             o^
             s°
               2i
                 ~pe
                                     i_
(6-16)
             ( E   = Efficiency
             ( P   = Partial Pressure of the Absorbed Gas
     where   ( Kg  = Overall Mass Transfer Coefficient
                       Ib mole/hr. ft.2
             ( Z   = Axial distance, ft.
             ( G   = Mass Velocity, Ib mole/hr.ft.
             ( a   = Area, ft2
was used in deriving relations for removal efficiency.

     The surface area can be determined from the liquid to
gas ratio in the absorber and the mean liquid drop size.
            S =
where
    3.05 x 10°      Vi

        00          *g

S  = Specific Surface Area, ft. /ft.'

V]_ = Volume of liquid, ft.
Vg = Volume of gas, ft.
Do = Mean drop diameter, microns.
                             (6-17)
                            -127-

-------
     An estimate of Do can be obtained  from the Nukiyama
and Tanasawa equation.
               /	      f  s .1   ~\ 0 A.Z, /      -, IE:
          585  v/CT-  +597.1 -^L—=-\      (1000 VI \     (6-18)
        " ug   nr-      \ ^T )      \    v^J
               V /                 '             /

    where Ug  =  Velocity of the gas, meters/sec.

          /   =  Liquid density, gm/cc

          ^l  =  Liquid viscosity, poise

          0   =  Liquid surface tension, dynes/em

     For cases where gas phase resistance is controlling an
analagous form of equation (6-16) based on system pressure
drop has been used (5) to correlate data as A P is a function
of gas flow and thus dispersed area.  In this form

                       j         i
     I - E = exp       ' -A A PB j            (6-19)

     where AP = differential pressure  (in f^Q)

           A&B are constants

     For other cases other than gas film controlling an
over-all mass transfer co-efficient is defined as:
=  1  +   n  +  n  +  n
  k_a    k^a   ksa   kra
                                             (6-20)
     where n = Henry's Law constant  (Ib mol/ft. )

     (Subscripts refer to the gas film, liquid film,
solubility, and reaction resistances respectively.)

     As the chemical reactions involved in the absorption
are acid-base  (fast) reactions, the final term in  (6-20) is
zero.  Recent investigations  (1) have also determined that
the solids dissolution resistance is zero, and that the
liquid phase and gas phase resistances are each approximate-
ly one-half of the total.  To incorporate the contribution
of liquid film resistance, we have correlated the .data in
                           -128-

-------
the form            -            ~]
        1 - E = exp i  -A APB    _|                     (6-21)
                     (10PH)C(S02)
                                 D;
where the denominator in (6-21) represents the liquid film
resistance.  This correlation is shown graphically in Figure
29, which presents the results obtained using the final form
of the prediction equationI
             r                       -1.014
 1 - E = exp ! 	' 2.666 (A P	)	-3(6-22)
                    3.75 - 0.271 In S02I .  .-6+0.031 pH)


                    E = Fraction S02 Removal

                  /N, P = Pressure Drop, Inches H20

                 S02i = Inlet Concentration S02/ PPM

     This prediction equation was developed from both the data
obtained during the operations at Mystic Station in Boston,
and from some subsequent additional data obtained during
intial operations at an installation on a coal fired boiler.
This latter operation provided data for extension of the
equation to higher pressure drops.

     The correlation also illustrates the relatively small
change in S02 removal efficiency over wide turn down ratios
of the power generator.  The high efficiency of S02 removal
over the ranges of power output of a cycling generating
station is explained by the relative invariance of the
surface area available for mass transfer over that range.
Figure 30 is a plot of surface area, based on uniform drop
size, for a constant liquid rate, which shows only a 33%
reduction is surface area for a 4 to 1 turn down, equivalent
to operations between 40 MW and 150 MW Mystic #6 power
generator.
                            -129-

-------
   CD.
   CD
   CD-
  i
  «
  U_
  u_
  LU
l  CE
CD
I
  LU
   CD
   UD
  CD
  CO
   CD.
   \S)
                              8
—i—
10
12
                          DELTfi P  -  IN-H20
—I—
14
                      502=1000 PPM
                  N INLET 502=700 PPM
                   INLET 502=400 PPM
—i—
16
18
    502  REMOVRL  EFFICIENCY
    EFFECT  OF DELTfl  P RND  INLET SG2 CQNC
                  Fig. 29

-------
  Fl'At
         I7.5--
         15.0-
         195

Surface  Area
Absorber Vol.1


         /e.o
         •7.5
         5.0
            IOO/S6C. GA5
                                                           75/SEC.
                          /
                         2O
                                                    ON PgOPCOTIES
                                             OF Pug£ WATgO
 1
40
 i
80
                                      1.000 CFM)
                                    FIG 30
                                     -131-

-------
     An estimate of the accuracy of the correlation in pre-
 dicting S02  removal  efficiency  is  given below:
          ACCURACY OF SO7 REMOVAL CORRELATION

                                              Standard
         Source of Data        No. of Points  Deviation

         Boston Edison             600      •    4.0
         Coal Fired Boiler           5          2.9

         Boston Test Runs
         Used to Check Corre-
         lation                      5          3.1
6.3  CENTRIFUGATION AND SOLIDS SEPARATION

     The centrifuge was normally capable of separating 50%
of the incoming solids in the recycle slurry, but some in-
stances were encountered in which the centrifuge did not
perform satisfactorily, i.e., solids were not removed at a
rate sufficient to maintain control of recycle solids con-
centration.

     In all, during the entire program, operations were
interrupted three times by inability to control slurry solids
by centrifuging the bleed stream.  An analysis of the con-
ditions prevailing showed that during these periods mag-
nesium sulfate level was higher than normal in the recycle
liquor, an effect which arose because of changes in operating
conditions.  In addition, the concentration of MgO in the
slurry was also shown to have an effect.  These relations
are shown in Figure 31 which relates recycle solids concen-
tration to MgS04 level and pH.

6.4  REGENERATION MECHANISMS

     The principal operation in the regeneration plant is
the calcination of the dryer product from the absorption
system.  This can be most simply described as a thermal
decomposition:

            MgS03 	*-. MgO + S02
                    heat
                                -132-

-------
  o
  o
  CoJ
  O
  o

  CD J
 I — • — •
 O
 Q_
  I
 COO
 0°
u>
1 UJo
 O
 UJ
 cc
  o
  o
  oJ
  o
  o
  "%.SO
6. 00
6.50    7.00
7.SO
8. 00
                                                 M
                                         gS03 . 3H20 Case
8.50
9.00
9-50
10. 00
                             PH
   EFFECT  OF  SYSTEM  PH  RND MGS04  LEVEL
   ON RECY.SOLIDS "CONTENT -DflTfl TO 3/12/74
                                           Fig. 31

-------
     The rate of the decomposition is temperature dependent,
and some decomposition has been observed at temperatures  as
low as 300°C.  For the production of useful product in this
program, the rotary calciner has been operated at mid kiln
temperatures above 1000°F.

     In addition to the simple decomposition of MgS03» the
calcination step also serves the purpose of reducing the
MgS04» a side product in the absorption reaction which is
also present in the feed.  This reaction can be represented
by either of the following equations:

     2MgS04 + C	»- 2MgO + 2S02 + CC>2    (6-24)

      ,XG  iiooop = -3lKCal

     MgS04 + C	 MgO + S02 + CO       (6-25)

      ± G  11000F = ~14 KCal

     Other reactions can also take place in the kiln environ-
ment :

     1/2 MgS04	=— 02 + 1/2 MgS          (6-26)

     MgS04 	>- Mg02 + S02            (6-27)

     2 CO + S02	*~2 C02 +S°             (6-28)

     1/2 02 + S02 —*-S03                   (6-29)

     All of these reactions are both time and temperature
dependent and the calciner is equivalent to a multi-zone
linear reactor.  In the course of the program, in addition
to the production of thousands of tons of acceptable re-
generated MgO, upset conditions have occasionally resulted
in the formation of high concentrations of 803 and at other
times in the formation of elemental sulfur.

     Attempts have been made to study these upset conditions
in the laboratory,  and thermal decomposition studies have
been carried out on a laboratory scale using infrared spec-
troscopic techniques to investigate the phenomenon of sulfur
                             -13.4-

-------
formation by detection of the appearance of its precursors.
Those studies, which are described more fully in Section
6.1, have not as yet yielded any specific information on the
formation of elemental sulfur;  however, they have yielded
information indicating that the decomposition process for
MgSC>3 obtained from the trihydrate form and the hexahydrate
form may be different.

     Retention time in the calciner can be determined from
the following equation:

         6  =  0.19 L
                N D S

     where  0  = time  (min.)
            L  = kiln length  (ft.)
            N  = Rotational Speed (RPM)
            D  = Dryer Diameter (ft.)
            S  = Slope (ft./ft.)

     For most operations undertaken during this project re-
tention time was approximately one hour.  Because of the use
of tube coolers on the calciner, an additional one hour was
required before final discharge to the product conveyors.

     Studies of heat transfer in a rotary kiln (8) have re-
sulted in the formulation of prediction equations for the
solids - gas temperature relations considering the following

     1)     Gas to solid heat transfer.

     2)     Gas to calciner wall heat transfer.

     3)     Calciner wall to solid heat transfer.

     4)     Conduction thru the kiln wall.

     5)     Conduction and convection to ambient air
            from the kiln.

     Such studies have not considered the additional compli-
cations of chemical reaction in the charge or radiation from
the flame at the discharge end.
                            -135-

-------
     The data resulting from the test program phase of this
project were analyzed to provide correlations for both the
percent of MgS04 in the product and the bulk density of the
product. These correlations are given in the following equations
6-31 and 6-32, and provide a means of determing the pro-
cessing condition necessary for the production of an active
magnesia and control of magnesium sulfate concentration.
                            -136-

-------
                               CALCINER OPERATIONS
                     CORRELATION FOR PREDICTION AND CONTROL
                       OF % MgSO^ IN REGENERATED MAGNESIA
% MgS04= -90.2+(T'*A)+(C*B)-2.46  (%MgSO4 in feed) +0.989  (%MgSOa in Feed)
              + 4.1  (%02 in Acid Gas) + 0.28  (Feed Rate, Lb./Min)          (6-31)
I
M
UJ
I
                                                            1/2
             Where    T1 =  (1700 - °F Mid Kiln Temperature)
                      A  = -0.870 + 0.185  (% MgSO4 in Feed)
                      B  =15.7-23.4  (Furnace Draft)  - 2.19  (% O2  in Acid  Gas)
                           -0.61 (% MgSO4 in Feed)
                      C  = % Carbon in Feed
           Statistics:  Standard Deviation = 5.4
                        Multiple Correlation Coefficient =0.77
                        Confidence Level of F Ratio =  99.9%  +
                        No. of Data Points = 207

-------
                                         CALCINER OPERATIONS
                               CORRELATION FOR PREDICTION AND CONTROL
                               OF  BULK DENSITY OF REGENERATED MAGNESIA
u>
00
BD=169.2 +  (T'*A)+(C*B)+0.741  (% MgSO4 in Feed)  -0.744  (% MgSO3 in Feed)
      -4.9(% O2 in Acid Gas)-0.4(Feed Rate, LB./MIN.)-104(Furnace Draft)   (6-32)

                                                   1/2
      Where  T"  =   (1700-°F Mid Kiln Temperature)
             A   =   -0.891+0.166  (C)
             B   =   -28.4+3.44(C)+71.2(Furnace  Draft)+1.95 (% O2 in Acid Gas)
                     -1.24(% MgS04  in Feed)
             C   =   % Carbon in Feed
                                                  3      '
            BD   =   Product Bulk Density, LB./FT0  (Operations @ 1.82 RPM
                     Add 5 to BD for 1.56 RPM)
                 Statistics:
                    Standard Deviation =7.2
                    Multiple Correlation Coefficient = 0.79
                    Confidence Level of F  Ratio  = 99.9% +
                    No. of Data Points = 456

-------
6.4.1.  Magnesium Sulfate Control

     It has been shown  (6-14, 6-15) that magnesium sulfate
formation occurs to some extent in the process due to both
the presence of oxygen and 603 in the flue gas entering the
venturi and some additional conversion of MgSC>3 to MgS04 in
the dryer.

     It is necessary to reduce and control the magnesium
sulfate concentration in the recycled MgO in order to prevent
both:  ultimate conversion of the absorbent to the sulfate
and to prevent centrifugal separational problems associated
with the increasing viscosity of more concentrated MgSC>4
solutions.

     Direct reduction of magnesium sulfate in the calciner
by operation at temperatures sufficient to thermally decom-
pose MgS04  (2000°F) would cause "dead burning" of the
magnesia product and render it useless for absorption of
S02-  It is evident from 6-24 and 6-25 that the presence of
carbon in the calciner feed can result in the reduction of
the MgS04 contained in it at temperatures which still pro-
duce a useful product.

     At the outset of the program carbon, in the form of
coke, was added to the process.  However, difficulty in
obtaining a grade of coke sufficiently low in ash prevented
a controlled program of carbon addition.  After the initial
operations of the F0G.D. System it was noted that the in-
coming calciner feed contained some carbon which had been
removed in the venturi as uncombusted fuel or "oil smut"
from the flue gas.  A number of analyses of the calciner
feed revealed that the feed had an average carbon content
between 0.5% and 1% which was sufficient for control of the
magnesium sulfate in the product.  Normally, the calciner
was operated to reduce the MgS04 content from 11% in the
feed to 5% to 8% in the products, i.e., reduction of 50% to
70% of the incoming sulfate.

     Equation 6-31 provides the empirical relationship between
the control variables and the MgS04 content in the regenerated
product. This is presented graphically in Figure 32.
                            •139-

-------
 o.
 OJ
 tO-
Q
O
CO co
C)
 ^00
900
1000
1100    1200    1300    UOO
  MIDKILN TEMP-DEG F
1500
1600
1700
  CRLCINER OPERRTION  - EFFECT  OF
  MIDKILN TEMP. & 7.C GN XMG504  IN  PRODUCT
                              32

-------
6.4.2  Magnesia Activity Control

     The principal control parameter in the calciner opera-
tion has been the bulk density of the regenerated MgO. Values
of calciner product bulk density between 20 and 25 lb/ft3
have resulted in better performance in the F.G0D. System,
and the property can be readily measured by the calciner
operator using several commercially available devices.  In
this work a "paint pigment volumeter" was used.

     The effect of carbon content and mid-kiln temperature
on the product bulk density, developed from equation 6-32,
has been shown in Figure 1.

6.5  MgO LOSSES AND REGENERATION CYCLES

     A)  Losses

     In early operation of the system, losses of MgO were
high.  The main losses resulted from:  frequent clean out of
plugged equipment, discarding both oversize materials and
any spilled solids, entrainment to the stack, overflows, and
cleaning the absorber when the system was shut down.

     By June 1973, the installation of lump crushers and re-
routing the dryer off gas to the absorber, reduced the loss
substantially but did not eliminate it.  Spills were still
discarded and the venturi absorber was still drained on shut
down.  Another continuing contributor to  the loss of
alkali was the higher than design gas flow, which resulted
in excessive entrainment of absorber slurry.

     In the final period of operation, from March 1974,
controls were imposed to eliminate many of the loss points.
During part of this period a careful measurement of system
losses were made in order to identify the sources which
could not be eliminated in the current program for future
design improvements.

     The loss history for the entire operating period is
accounted for on a rate basis in Figure 33.

     In the initial operations, startup and shakedown,
system losses averaged 1075 Ib/hr. of operation or a total
                            -141-

-------
  -1
  OO
CQ
- I O.
  UD

CO
D_
rvj
    PRE-STARTUP
       AND
    SHAKEDOWN
                                  AVERAGE LOSS PER PERIOD
                       TEST
                       AND
                       DEVELOPMENT
                                         OPERATING
   U/72
               6/73
        500
1000    1500   2000    2500    3000
               OPERATING HOURS
                                            . 3500
   PROCESS   MGG  CONSUMPTION
   BY  OPtRRTING  PERIODS
                                                       MYSTIC STATION
                                                       REGENERATION
4000
U500
                                    Fig. 33

-------
of 606 tons as MgO in the 1127 hours logged from initial
startup in April 1972 to the completion of the first phase
in June 1973.

     The second period, the test and development program,
had an average MgO loss rate of 415 Ib/hr. of operation.
The total loss in the 1350 hours logged from July 1973 to
February. 1974 for this phase of operations was 151 tons as
MgO.

     Similarly, in the final period from March to the end
of the program, losses averaged 234 Ib/hr. as MgO;  a total
of 151 tons of MgO lost in 1293 hours logged.

     A comparison of the measured losses at Mystic Station
(cross hatched) and the losses from the regeneration plant
for the March through June 1974 period are also shown in
this figure.  It should be noted that the regeneration plant
losses were approximately constant during the entire program.

     In the final operating period at Mystic Station, gas
flow to the absorber was maintained at the design rate and
the system was run as a closed loop with no vessel drainage,
returning the small spills back to the process.  Measurements
were made at the following 14 loss points (Table 22) at
Boston for the continuous operations period and the silos
were emptied and the contents weighed before and after the
run for accuracy of inventory measurements.

                          Table 22
     Potential Sources of MgO Losses at Mystic Station

     1)  Stack
     2)  Centrifuge Washing
     3)  Centrifuge Case Leaks
     4)  Pump Packing Gland Leaks
     5)  Absorber Overflow
     6)  MgO Slurry Tank Blow-Down
     7)  MgO Slurry Tank Overflow
     8)  Centrate Tank Overflow
     9)  Solids Loss at Dryer Feed End
    10)  Dust Loss at Dryer I.D. Fan
    11)  Dust Loss at Expansion Joints
                             -143-

-------
     12)  Spillage at MgO Feeder
     13)  Spillage in MgS03 Belt Gallery
     14)  Spillage at Truck Loading Point

     The tests, conducted over 13 days, in which 336,470 Ibs.
of regenerated material were fed  (an additional 2,504 Ibs. of
MgO added with the fuel oil was also accounted for), showed
a loss of 0.37 tons/operating day at the absorber system,
distributed as follows:
                                    Ton/Day
     Loss to Stack                   0.13
     Absorber Overflow               0.14
     Misc. Measured Loss             0.07
     Unmeasured Loss (by difference) 0.03
                                     0.37
With an average MgO consumption in the process of 10.61
tons/day during the period, the 0.37 tons/day loss represents
a 3.5% loss rate at the F.G.D. System.

     The greatest losses were found however, to occur at the
regeneration plant.  Here 1.5 tons/day of equivalent MgO is
lost from the neutralizer system overflow and another 0.5
tons per day is scalped off, for future reclamation, before
being pulverized.

     Both of these losses would be virtually eliminated in a
full size regeneration plant.

     B)  Regeneration Cycles

         The information on total losses has been combined
with the other inventory records including the receiving
records for virgin MgO shipments to evaluate the number of
regenerations.  In the start-up and shake-down period,  losses
were 606 tons of MgO, with 559 tons of regenerated MgO re-
cycled to the Mystic #6 System. This rate of loss limited
the number of recycles from 2 to 3 before the material was
lost from the system.
                              -144-

-------
      During the test and development period, 1717 tons of
regenerated MgO were returned to the system, while 338 tons
of MgO equivalent were lost.  This corresponds to 5.1 cycles
for the magnesia before it is lost from the system.

      During the final period, 151 tons of magnesia were
lost, while 875 tons of regenerated alkali was shipped back
to Boston.  This would correspond to 5.8 cycles;  however,
during this same period there was an inventory build-up
with 80 tons of equivalent MgO inventory at the beginning,
and 214 tons remaining at the close of the program so that
only five regeneration cycles can be accounted for.
                           -145-

-------
    7.0  DESCRIPTION OF THE TEST AND DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM
     A test program was developed for the "New England
S02 Control Project" on the basis of two years operation
of the system.

     This planned program was divided into three phases,
first a period of start-up and break in operations of the
integrated plants carried out over a three to six months
period.  Then a twelve month period in which several
variables, considered to be most important for successful
operation of the system, were to be investigated by operat-
ing the plant setting the variables to evaluate perfor-
mance and determine the best methods of overall system
control.  A final period of three to six months of opera-
tion at optimized conditions was planned to demonstrate
the long term capability of the project and provide
further information on the results of continuous "on stream"
running.

     The actual operating periods for the Start-Up and
Break-In Tests and the Variables Screening Tests deviated
considerably from the proposed plan to conform to the
situations which are described in the previous sections.
A further complication to controlled operation arose
because of the economic-dispatch method of setting boiler
load which favored maximum load on the Mystic 6 unit when
it was fired with high sulfur fuel.  For this reason, the
F.G0D. system treated a higher than average gas flow based
on the load data supplied by Boston Edison Company. Except
for disruption  of any test plan, the effect on operation
was not serious as the F.G.D. System had been designed for
continuous full load operation although complications were
introduced by the greater than design gas flow.

     It was not till the last six months of the program,
after approval was obtained from local authorities for a
partial gas bypass, that the F.G.D. System could be
operated at its design gas flow while the boiler was fired
at its maximum rating.
                          -146-

-------
7.1  TEST PROGRAM

     While the time schedule of the program was changed,
the goals of the three periods remained the same and the
test plan is summarized to show the scope of the project.

7.1.1 Start-Up and Break-In Tests

      An initial period of testing started after mechanical
completion of the plant had been accomplished.  A prestart
period was included which was limited to the accumulation
of 2 days production of MgSC>3 at the. Boston Edison site.

     This initial period was to demonstrate the operability
of all equipment at Boston Edison as well as the integrity
of the piping and equipment.  After pre-start-up, the start-
up and break-in period continued under Chemico supervision
and shipment of MgS03 to the calcining facility was ini-
tiated to begin integrated operation at both sites.

     During this period operating, testing and analytical
procedures were tried and evaluated;  equipment tested,
and additional training completed.  In addition, the first
phase of testing started in order to find the conditions
necessary to achieve even a limited level of system opera-
bility.

     This initial period provided wide ranging operating
conditions as flows and equipment settings were adjusted
to and modifications made to obtain a satisfactory level
of semi-continuous performance of the recovery-regenera-
tion facilities.  All data collected during this period
were accumulated for use in the statistical analysis pro-
grams used to assess the program.

7.1.2 Variables Screening Tests

     Following the Start-up and Shake-down period, a test
and development program, designed to investigate the effects
of primary process variables on the overall operation was
initiated.  After determining conditions which made the
plants functional during the first period, certain pro-
cess variables were chosen for study and the effect on
plant operation gauged.
                          -147-

-------
     The program was to establish a model of the principal
process mechanisms from which the effect of changes in
operating conditions could be evaluated.  From this model
 (and consideration of pilot plant results), preliminary
values for the parameter excursions were chosen, and experi-
mental sets planned so that the data collected could be
used for optimization of the process.  After initial tests
to evaluate the effect of the variable excursions, and to
determine if modifications to the scheme are necessary,
further optimization followed an evolutionary plan in order
to minimize system upset.  That is, the range allowed to
the parameters under examination were regulated in order
to insure minimum system upset and negligible effect on
power plant operation.

     Information was collected at these operating conditions
for a sufficient length of time to insure that the effects
could be determined with sufficient reliability by the use
of statistical methods.  Other variables or combinations
of variables were then selected and the process repeated
to provide information for the data file in order to es-
tablish regression equations to determine variable effects
and interactions at levels not specifically tested.

7.1.3 Long Term Tests

     During the design of the variables screening portion
of the Operational Tests Program the assumption of careful
control of all variables was assumed.  For any test the
boiler load was to be held within specified narrow limits
for the test period in order to evaluate the performance
of the associated flue gas scrubbing equipment under the
controlled conditions.  The long term tests were to follow
the normal operating ranges of the power boiler.  Figure 34
shows seasonal load variation based on data supplied by
Boston Edison Company and Figure 35 shows average daily
load swings for both spring and summer operation.  By
following the load swings the effect on F.G.D. System
operation could be determined.

7.2  STATISTICAL 'METHODS

     Throughout the term of operation of the program,  large
amounts of process data were generated.  In order to effi-
                           -148-

-------





— 1
1
LOAD [_
IU
ac
<



1 50
1 4O
I 30
1 2.0
1 1 0
1 00
90
SO
70
60
50
40
3.0
20
10
                           AVERAGE"
                         	SPRING
                         	 SUMMER
    MYSTIC
DAILY  LOAD  SWING
     FIG . 34
I  2 3 4 5 6 789 10 II 12 \  2
                A 56789 IO II 12
                              MIDNIGHT
        TIME
           -149-

-------
                    MYSTIC 6


              SEASONAL LOAD SWING
Q


O
_l


LJ
      90
      85
      80
      75
      70
      65
     60
>    55
      50
         JFMAMJJA50
                         -150-

-------
ciently assimilate, disseminate, analyze, and store this in-
formation, a computerized, statistical method of handling
the data was employed.  As a result, it was possible to
effect a real-time feedback to the process of correlated
and trend results at the time they would be most useful,
along with accumulating a permanent data bank available for
analysis and retrieval.  The statistical computer program
package utilized permitted the use of the same format data
file as input to a wide range of sub-programs, including
regression calculations, x-y plotting, file listings, trend
plots, etc.  This flexibility reduced the number of files
which needed to be maintained, in addition to the evident
speed advantages.

     Figure 36 illustrates the flow of information between
both the scrubber and calciner operating systems and the
computer data bank.  Operating conditions and analyses were
entered on punch cards on a daily basis for primary storage
and transferred to computer disk files for further pro-
cessing.  At monthly intervals the following statistics
were generated for all variables:  average, maximum, mini-
mum, standard deviation, and a percent change relative to
a base period.  The final stage in the data flow was the
integration of the operating log and analysis files, plus
the inclusion of appropriate time lags for the scrubber
and regeneration facilities to form single disk files suit-
able for input to correlation and plotter computer programs.
This process data bank is now a source of rapid retrieval
of process information for continued analysis and for com-
parison with results from other installations.

     The process correlations presented in previous sections
were developed primarily using the data bank as input to a
stepwise multiple linear regression program. This approach
minimizes the number of computer runs required to determine
equations which are statistically significant, and which
have been evaluated for consistency with observed data.
F ratio tests are employed to establish significance levels
for testing of equation variables, and coefficients are
calculated by least squares techniques. With respect to the
S02 removal efficiency correlation, log transformations
were required by the regression program.  Continued investi-
gation of mass transfer coefficients may lead to the use of
non-linear programs.
                           -151-

-------
                                               DATA.  FLOW
01
to
I
      SCRUBBED
      CALCIM&R.
                             LOO
                                                                    FIL&-:
                                             DATA,
                                                                     FILE-
DISPLAY
                                                                                           FILE-
                                              FIG.  36

-------
     As discussed in Section 7.0,  Description of the Test
and Development Program,  normal excursions in the process
variables were sufficient to satisfy the required scope of
the test program variation in levels of operating data.
                           -153- :

-------
              8.0 PERFORMANCE TEST RESULTS
     Performance tests on the Chemico Basic Magnesia System
installed at the Mystic Station were conducted by York Re-
search Corporation for Boston Edison Company.  The testing
period extended from February 27, 1974 through March 9, 1974
following a preliminary period in early February for equip-
ment set-up, familiarization, establishing gas velocity
profiles and gas flow measurement.

     The performance testing used the methods detailed in
the Federal Register, Vol. 36, No. 247, 1971 for:

     a.)   Gas analyses by Method 3

     b)   Particulate removal efficiency by Method 5

     c)   SC-2 removal efficiency by Method 6

     in addition, particulate removal efficiency for a range
of particle sizes was done using the method developed by
J. A. Brink (9).  The results are presented for S02 removal
efficiency in Table 23, for overall particulate removal
efficiency in Table 24, and for particle size removal
efficiency in Table 25.  Oil analyses data for the test
period are presented in Table 26.  These data has been
abstracted from the York Research Corporation's report
No. Y-8419 dated April 11, 1974.
                           -154-

-------
                                TABLE 23


                       S00  REMOVAL  - TEST  RESULTS
       BOILER
TEST   LOAD:    INLET GAS    S02 IN       S0'2 OUT      % S02     SO? OUT
NO.    MW       RATE: ACFM   PPM - VOL.   PPM - VOL.   REMOVAL   LB/106 BTU


1
M
Ul
(j\
\

1


2

1
146

1
144


446


486


,953


,991


926


1004


-.1


.5


71.


89.


1


0


92


.91


.3.


.1


0


0


.125.


.199

            2
        151     658,207        983.9        63.3         93.6      0.201



        148 1    503,233        833.3        86.6         89.6      0.243
          1)  Flue gas partially bypassed  to  stack  to  attain  design  gas  flow.

          2)  No  flue gas bypass.

-------
                                  TAB Li.' 24
                   PARTICIPATE REMOVAL - TEST RESULTS
       BOILER
TEST   LOAD:    INLET GAS    PARTICIPATES: LB/HR       %       PARTICULATES

1
U1
1




NO.
1'


2.

3
4
MW
146 -1

1
144
2
151
148 l
RATE :
446


486

658
503
,9


,9

5


ACFM
3


91

,20
,2
3

7
3

3


2

IN . OUT
80 116

*
32 11"5

399 150
1
51 82
REMOVAL
69. 5


50.4

62.4
45.7.
LB/106 BTU
0


0

0
0
.072


.084

.111
.068
      1)  Flue gas partially bypassed to  stack  to  attain design gas flow.
      2)  No flue gas bypass.

-------
                          TABLE 25

                   PARTICLE SIZE RESULTS



Test     Removal Efficiency         Removal Efficiency         Overall
No.      Above 1 Micron          >-  Below 1 Micron            Efficiency

1            89.5                       53.6                    85.5

2            89.5                       57.6                    85.8

3            80.75                      64.6                    74.4

4            94.4                       57.2                    88.9
                               -157-

-------
                         TABLE 26
                      OIL ANALYSIS
Parameter
BTU/lb
Specific Gravity
% Sulfur
% Ash
% Carbon
% Hydrogen
% Nitrogen
% Oxygen
Test #1
2/27/74
18,284
A
.9431
2.15
0.09
84.77
11.34
0.2
1.45
Test #2
2/28/74
18,348
A
.9433
2.10
0.10
84.79
11.42
0.2
1.39
Test #3
3/5/74
19,083
B
.9316
1.89
0.07
84.54
11.24
0.1
2.16
Test #4
3/9/74
19,145
B
.9366
2.04
0.07
84.39
11.39
0.1
2.01
A - Taken at 126°F, B - Taken at 130°F
                             -158-

-------
                        9.0  DATA
9.1  OPERATING RESULTS

     Operating data are summarized and presented as monthly
averages for the period from the initiation of Planned
Operational Testing through the end of the program.  Includ-
ed in this information are:

     Table 27,     Operating Conditions for the FGD System

     Table 28,     Stream Compositions for the FGD System

     Table 29,     Operating Conditions for the Regeneration
                   Unit

     Table 30,     Stream Composition for the Regeneration
                   Unit

9.2  RANGE OF SIGNIFICANT VARIABLES

     Frequency distribution and the range of the important
variables measured in this study are presented in Figures
37 through 63.

9.3  MISCELLANEOUS DATA

     Table 31,     Sulfur Content of High Sulfur Oil for
                   Mystic #6 Boiler

     Table 32,     Oil Ash Analyses

     Table 33,     Regenerated MgO Vanadium and Nickel
                   Content
                            -159-

-------
           9.1




OPERATING RESULTS
           -16,0-

-------
              TABLE  27




FLUE GAS DESULFURIZATION SYSTEM




       OPERATING CONDITIONS
VARIARLF
5+6/73
MONTHLY DATA AVERAGES
7/73 8+9/73 10/73
11
/73
12/73
SO? (PPM)



IN
OUT
SRF.MHV
PM
603
78
87
6
• 01
.65
.07
.86
789
106
86
7
.45
.50
.24
.02 7.14
734.
86.
67.
7.
45
53
03
?1
741
107
84
7
.80
'.31
'.24
.13
594
91
83
7
.83
.05
.89
.18
POWER Pt:ANT
R
0
(



ATFO-tvO
IFF. PRESSURES
IN.H20)
TOTAL
MIST
DR/FR
132


q
«
0
.02


.79
.89
.07
127


10
5
0
.26 116.59


.05 9loi
.06 2.63
.04 0.07
123.


9.
?.
0.
6?


0?
49
07
106


7
1
0
. 16


.25
.40
".08
124


9
0
0
.02


.30
.92
.07
TF.MPFRATHrtESCF)
— ARCritJDf-U







INI.FTq
GASOUT
SLURRl
•MGSLUR
-ORYF.K
GASOUT
PROO.
311
113
123
186

483
295
.30
.87
.60
.83

.13
.06
306
116
128
188

469
315
.93 293.46
.73 117.43
.00 123.01
.93 173.16

.51 469.04
.77 350.0?
300.
121 .
124.
177.

449.
339.
69
17
61
08

89
8?
294
124
1.23
184

443
332
.97
.08
.25
.26

.16
.13
288
120
131
172

441
340
.12
.98
.96
.43

.08
.68
FLOWS(GPM)



CTRC. 14
CF.NTFO
MGSLUR
748
118
5?
. 10
.62
.29
14458
110
.67 13778.52
.57 102191
44.94 49.98
13484.
114.
39.
79
1?
??
12688
128
58
'.96
.27
.69
14185
120
45
.61
.60
.59
CFNTRTFllGE
TORO.(G>S)


15

.58

23.22 15.48

-161-
23.

16

24

.71

22

.82


-------
              TABLE 27 (CONT'D)




FLUE GAS DESULFURIZATION SYSTEM




        OPERATING CONDITIONS

VARIABLE 1/74
s n 2 ( p p M )
IN 634.77
OUT 114.81
*REMOV ai.27
P H . 7.24
POWER PLANT
RATE(yW) 11.3.35
DTEE. PRESSURES
( IN.M20)
TOTAL 8.23
MIST 1.44
DRYER 0.05
TEMPERATllRES(E)
-ARSnR»ER
IMLETn 293.55
GASmiT 124.70
SLURR. 129.30
MGSLUR • 176.27
-ORYER
GASOUT 4P0.83
PRnn. 341.62
FLOWS(GPM)
CIRC. 14971.15
CEMTEn 120.55
MGSLUP ' 23.55
CENTRIFUGE
TORR.'CG>S) 22.81

MONTHLY DATA AVERAGES

2/74 3/74 '4/74 5/74 6/74
8.30.12 763.36 667.60 634.10 563.
107.61 125.
82.58 76.
7.20 7.13 7.01 6.94 6.
136.05 138.33 130.10 136.36 127.
7.02 6.47 5.90 5.53 6.
0.50 0.61 0.85 Ol77 1 .
0.05 0.06 0.07 Ol07 0.
299.63 287.88 2fM.96 287.04 287.
129.40 129.25 127.1/4 129.59 130.
128.26 128.87 130.88 130.32 130.
173.79 177177 179. ?4 176.74 177.
426.30 426.02 408.77 400.37 394.
349.96 334.36 120. «7 321.86 3l«.
14274.07 15492.71 15421.59 15245.29 1fl725.
123.68 130.12 129.42 130.01 130.
17.67 14.65 13.96 20.19 16.
16.90 13.36 12.97 10.87 7.
-162-
31
19
98
98
59
25
14
08
23
39
16
10
82
27
40
90
98
15


-------
              TABLE 28




FLUE GAS DESULFURIZATION SYSTEM




         STREAM ANALYSIS
MHMTHLY DATA AVERAGES
VARTARI.F 5*6/73
HRYE*
* SPL. 81.79
XM'ISm 60. ?5
*MGMI4 11.56
*MGp 3.58
CFNTPTFnGE
? S;H. . . 75.68
.3 M G S (1 3 5 3 . 0 7
SMGsn/4 7.47
*MGO ?.01
RECYCLE
? StlL. 10.49
PH 6.95
-FILTRATE
SMGS03 1.05
' KMGSD4 16.56
-CAKF
%MGf,03 5?. 67
*MGsn
-------
                           TABLE 28 (CONT'D)

              FLUE GAS DESULFURIZATION SYSTEM

                       STREAM ANALYSIS
VARIABLE
        MONTHLY  DATA  AVERAGES

 1/74       ?/74       3/74       4/7/1
                1.73
MOTHER LTOUnP
  % SOL.        8.37

 -CAKF
1 .82


3.53
                    3.03
                                    4.6?
                    3.0ft
                              6.57
                                                         5/74
2.97


3.13
                                         6/74
ORYF.R
* sni.
SMGSD3
XMGP.
C F N T R T F 1 ! ft E
* SHL.
'*Mr,5un
fcMGsna
*MGH
RECYCLE
* SOI.'.
PH
-FILTRATE
•XMGS04
-CAKE
* M G S 0 1
88.57 87.61 85.41 87. si 09^3 86.78
65.00 65.89 64.05 60.70 63^98 59.93
16.36 11.61 10.32 11.10 11.68 14.77
2.78 3.47 3.39 5.75 4.09 3.44
86.01 81.27 82.20 79.^0 79.17 78.57
46.61 48.64 . 46.93 4ft. ?n 47'.56 45.84
lf>. 13 6.75 6.86 /.33 8.07 10.47
'•21 1.47 1.70 3.61. 2.43 2.06

11.90 7.54 8.39 10.37 8.24 7.86
7.11 7.18 7.19 7.?1 7.n 7.17

15.83 12.41 13.73 15.08 16.69 18.58

• „ n
                                                                  2.26
                                        3.12
 XMGH
2.10
2.25
                                    3.75
                    4.00
4.93
4.03
                                  -164-

-------
                            TABLE  29




                    REGENERATION SYSTEM




                    OPERATING CONDITIONS
VARTAHLF 54.4/73
c a L c T M E R
-



•


TEMPERATIIPES(F)
M 0 K T L M 122J./2
GASnUT 650.27
P R n D F Y 159. n 1
SOLID FLnwS(PPM)
M G S n 3 * 3 . 8 7
COKE 0.84
NEUT. PH Llo. 5.64
AC
FE

in PLANT
r.n GAsrS)
Cn n.io
MONTHLY DATA AVERAGES
7/73 84-9/73 10/73

12?8.00 1189.51
665.56 588.73
1.'8.80 H7;i?

59.89 66.35
0.97 0.25
5.25 5.51


0.17 n. a.

1091 .74
569. *1
161.33

7?. 05
0.0
5.94


n. a.
11/73

1001 .
555.
202.

76.
0.
5.


n. ;

24
66
57

81
0
75


l.
12/73

983
563
149

65
0.
5


n

.28
.23
.07

.47
0
.53


.a.
r'2             *.96       5.20     10.?5       4.43       4.?9      3.69




sn;?            3.5fl       n. a.        n. a.        n. a.        n. a.       n. a.
                                 -165-

-------
  TABLE 29(C6NT'D)




REGENERATION SYSTEM




OPERATING CONDITIONS
MONTHLY DATA AVERAGES
VARIABLE
C A L C T N E R
-TFMPFRATUPES
MCKTLN
GASH u T
p R n n F v
-SOLin FLOWSf
MGSH3
COKE
NPUT. PM LIO.
ACID PLAMT
FEED GASTX)
en
n?
sn?
1/74 2/74

(F)
958.45 1045.89
53*. 55 571.68
154.7? 19?.? 3
PPM)
62.60 76.81
0.0 0.0.
5.72 5.11


n. a. n. a.
5.01 5.36
n. a. n. a.
3/74


1005.60
546.98
168.95

76.45
0.0
5.19


n. a.
5.31
n. a.
4/74 5/74


1019. *5 1072.56
550.53 560.16
165.4? 179.00

77.80 77.00
0.0 0.0
5.A8 5.7?


n. a. n. a.
4 . n 9 4.97
n. a. n. a.
6/74


1052.75
538.03
172.61

78.94
0.0
5.66


n. a.
4.66
n. a.
           -166-

-------
        TABLE 30
REGENERATION SYSTEM
  STREAM ANALYSIS
VART ARLF
FFFO
* H?f]
t M G S H 3
* M G s n a
*Mr,n
?! C A * R M
CALCTMF.P
PRODUCT
% M G S fl 3
x M G s n a
* M G (1
S02FFF
RLKDFN
5+6/73 7/73

16.47 1.7.79
58.94 5B.92
10.31, 10.93
7.56 7.S2
n. a, n. a.


0,06 0.02
5.38 6.05
91.24 89.59
52.27 47.33
28.30 31.33
fl-t-9/73 10/73

16.86 14.88
57.30 59. tn
1 1 .59 12.63
8.59 6 . *9
n.a. 1 .n5


0.0 O.na
8.71 10.47
93.38 85^6
23.43
40.18 34.08
11/73 12/73

15.56 13.20
59.09 61.53
12.54 12.38
7.28 7.78
0 ". fl 1 0.45


Oi.0 0.01
10.91 B.2fl
84".04 86.11

34.04 49.46
           -167-

-------
V ft « I A R L F
       TABLE 30(CONT'D)




REGENERATION SYSTEM




 STREAM ANALYSIS
   MONTHLY DATA AVERAGES




      ?/74
5/74
6/74
C A L f T :\l F p
FFF.D
% H?H
XMGS0.3
*Mr,Sn« '
x M G :i
9; CAROM
CALCTNJFR
PRODUCT
XMGsm
X M G S PI 4
*MGn
S02F.FF
B 1, K n E M


1?
' 65
10
s
1


0
17
84

,7


.MR
.31
.95
.36
.65


.00
.5?.
. 1 3

.65


Q
6/1
1 0
6
1


0
16
R6
3/4
?7


.86
.64
.13
.88
.02


.02
.75
.93
.00
.76


13.33 15.06
64.13 5 R . 3 R
6.9? 9. QP
6.79 7.RO
2.05 1 .06


0.37 0.0
4.37 4.0?
8 R . ? 1 90.10

24.0? 3?.SR


1?
61
11
4
1


0
1?
83

20


.70
.97
.95
.7ft
.04


.0
.4?
.80

.85


15.
58.
1 1.
5.
1.


0.
7.
86.

25.


20
66
87
75
1 3


12
60
69

80
           -168-

-------
                 9.2




RANGE OF SIGNIFICANT VARIABLES
              -169-

-------
 CO
 I—

 °-<
  I

.'. ED"
o
i
  "o
  0_
  o_
  1/7
  °60
     65
70
—r~
75
—I	f—
80     85

   PCT.
90
—i—
95
100
105
BOSTON  ED.OPERRTI0N  -  502
  FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION
                      RFMOVR
                                              EFF.

                                               Fig. 37

-------
 CJ_
CO
       ^oo
moo
soa
1000
120O   14 GO
1600
1800
                         PPM
  BOSTON ED.QPERRTIQN
   FREQUENCY  DI SIR I BUT I ON
                S02 INLET CONC
                                   Fig. 38

-------
 o
 o_
 \r>
 o
 0_
CO
       50
100
                150
200
                          PPM
BOSTON  ED.OPERRTI3N -
  FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION
250
                S02
300
350
400
450
                                  OUTLET CONC
                                                 Fig. 39

-------
 f—
OJ
I
  ^
  C.J
  un
V
         /w
            LOO
I SO
2OO
25O
3OG
   BOSTON ED.OPERflTION
    FREQUENCY  DiSTRiBUTiON
             L_ c ri U
                         Fig. 40

-------
°0
                      IN. H2G
 BOSTON ED-OPERRTION - TOTflL DELTfl
   FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION
P
  Fig. 41

-------
   o
   o

   oT
  O
  O
  O
  OJ
 CD
LT
I
  O
  o.
  o
  0_
  \n
        240
260
280
300    320
 DEG. F
340
360
380
400
   BOSTON ED.OPERRTION
     FREQUENCY  DISTRIBUTION
                 RBSOR6.INLET  TEMP
                                      Fig.42

-------
     CD
     in.
     CD
     CD
   LT>
   (SD
en
I
     CD
        0
I MO
20O .
220
       R n s T n M   F n   n p F p^ p T  T n IM
       LJ L v J 1  l_y I 'J   •	 L..' a ^__; |  	 I ) II  !  i >_/ 1 VJ
        FREQUENCY  iJ I SIR 1 BUT I ON
                                                                          Fig. 43,

-------
 o
 o
 CD.
 o.
 oo
CO
 o.
U_co
CD.
 CD
 CD.
 0_
 C\)
       300
350
400
450
                             F
500
550
600
650
700
  BOSTON  ED-OPERRTION
    FREQUENCY  DISTRIBUTION
                 DRYER  GRS  OUT  TEMP
                                      Fig. 44

-------
                                        600
                    650
                        F
BOSTON  ED-OPERRTION
  FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION
DRYER  PRODUCT  TFMP
                    Fig. 45

-------
   CD.

   BO
  CO


  I—


  Q_
VD
I
   CD.
   zr
         70
              LOO
I OS
U O
                             -"; ."n I i n ^;
                             ..'vj L. j U --
    BOSTON  ED.OPERRTION
     FREQUENCY  DISTRIBUTION
-  DRYER PRODUCT
                        Fig. 46

-------
 Q_,
(-• ED
00 .
O
I
SO     7O      SO
     PCT- MG-503
                                               100
                                                  l 10
180
BOSTON  EDaOPERRTION  -  DRYER
 FREQUENCY  DISTRIBUTION
                                            PRODUCT
                                                           Fig. 47

-------
 Q__ i
00
M
I
  LT7 I
               LQ
 20
PCT-
25
- —r' ~
30
   BOSTON  ED-0PERRTI3N
     FREQUENCY DISTRIBUT ION
nR Y PR  p Rnr;1
!_• I > i '	 1 i  1 i i < J !	' l_-
                       r
                    Fig. 48

-------
   cr> i

   LO 4
  in
00
to
I
                                                      —i
                                                      45
10
15    ^o
    PCT- MGO
    BOSTON  ED.OPERflTION
     FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION
                 DRYER  PRODUC1
                                     Fig. 4;9

-------
CO
oo
                                      30O
                    4OO
    BOSTON  EDoOPERHTION
     FREQUENCY  DISTFU BUT ION
- CENTRIFUGE  PEED
                        Fig. 50

-------
en
CD-
rr
      10
                    •-40     50
                     Ft.-Lb. /32
     60
 BO
STON ED.OPERflTlON
CENTRIFUGE
TORQUE
  FREQUENCY  DISTRIBUT13M
                                                Fig. 51

-------
00
Ul
i
  ST.)
  O  i
    CD

    r\i
                                   ISOOO
                                     GTM
     BOSTON  ED.OPERflTI Oh
      FREQiJENCY  D I SIR I BUT I ON
l 60OO
p p" r- Y
    V
I 70OO
i Boaa
'DOOO
                          Fig. 52

-------
   j 1
   '
CX)

CTi

I

                                            ISO
                                              •i 55
           ED.OPERflTION
BOSTON

 FREQUENCY  DI3TRIBUT I ON
- RECY-  SLUR
T r M P
! L_ I I i
                                                 Fig. 53

-------
00
^J
I
  u_ —
  ED

   en
   CD-
           /
                lO
t 5
25
                             PCT.
                               40
    BOSTON,  ED.OPERflTION  -  RECYCLE  SOLID!
     FREQUENCY  DISTRIBUTION
                                   Fig. 54

-------
   ii
oo
I
  ca-
  ui
                   I
I


\
                         \
                          \
              10
                          PCT-
   BOSTON  ED.OPERflTION
    FREQUENCY  DISTRIBUTION
     -  RECYCLE  MGS04
                             Fig. 55

-------
I-.
00
kO
I
   Q_

     C3
   ' i CO
                                                              —i—
                                                              12
fen
                                                10
                            lG
                                             PCT.
  BOSTON   ED.OPERRtlON
   FRtQUENCY  DI3TRIBUT 1 ON
f
                                                                       \ I ,- i  !
                                                                                    Fig. 56

-------
   en
   en.
   CD
   C3.
   OO
  Q-.
   i
  U_i
O ED
   5.50
6-00
e. so
7.OQ
7.50
 TH
                       s.oo
S.50
                                             -OO
                                                  3-50
                                               to.oo
    BOSTON  ED-OPERRTION
     FREQUENCY  DISTRIBUTION
                     - RECY.  PH
                                                  Fig. 57

-------
   CD
   CD
   CD
   CD.
   00
   CD.
I  U_CO

UD  °

I
   .CD
   CD.
   CD

   CM
         600
80O
LOOO
1200
 DEG.
1400
ISOO
1800
2000
2200
                                F
     CflLClNER  OPERflTION
      FREQUENCY  DISTRIBUTION
               -  MIDKILN  TEMP.
                                        Fig. 58

-------
10
N)
I
                        80     90
                        LB./MIN.
     100
110
120
130
     CRLCINER  OPERRTI0N  -
     FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION
MG503 FEED  RflTE
                    Fig. 59

-------
»u
                   SO     90
                   PCT. MG-Q
     LOO
                                               130
CRLCINER  OPERRTION
 FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION
PRODUCT flNflLYSI
                    Fig. 60

-------
                   40    50
                   PCT. MGS04
60
70
80
90
CRLCINER  0PERRTION - PRODUCT
 FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION
    RNRLYSIS
               Fig. 61

-------
Ul
I
                           X
                               \
                                    \
                           yo     so
                           B./CU-P"T.
        60
,x

	f -

 70
80
90
     CflLCINER  OPERflTION
      FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION
-  PRODUCT  BULK  DENS
                         Fig. -62

-------

o
10
20
                           PCT.
  CPLCINER QPERflTIQN
   FREQUENCY DISTRIBUT ION
                   flCID
                FEED GPS  02
                                           Fig. 63.

-------
            9.3




MISCELLANEOUS DATA
             -197-

-------
                                TABLE 31

                             MYSTIC STATION
                                 UNIT #6
                           SULFUR - #6 FUEL OIL
                     7. S                                           % S

April 72             1.72                      Jan.  73             2.04
                                                                   2.08
May 72               1.86                                         V2.11
                     1.86                                          2.05
                     1.93
                     1.88                      Feb.  73             2.08
                                                                   2.07
June 72              1.93                                          2.17
                     1.91                                          2.17
                     1.91
                     2.05                      March 73             2.11
                                                                   2.13
July 72              2.05                                          2.11
                     2.03                                          2.12
                     2.08
                     2.05                      April 73             2.08
                                                                   2.10
Aug. 72              2.00                                          2.05
                     2.14
                     2^09                      May  73              2.10
                     2.09                                          2.06
                     1.99                                          2.09

Sept. 72             2.03                      June  73             2.10
                     2.10                                          2.06
                     2.04                                          2.05
                     2.01                                          1.73

Oct. 72              2.01                      July  73             2.04
                     2.01                                          2.08
                     1.81                                          1.95
                     1.97                                          2.13

Nov. 72              2.00                      Aug.  73             2.00
                     2.04                                          2.08
                     1.96                                          2.10
                     2.04                                          2.11
                     2.02                                          2.08

Dec. 72              1.96                      Sept. 73             2.03
                     2.01                                          2.05
                     2.10                                          2.07
                     2.09                                          2.02
                              ..  -198-

-------
                            TABLE 31 (CONT'D)
                         STATION #200  - UNIT .#6
Oct. 73
Nov. 73
Dec. 73
Jan. 74
Feb. 74
March 74
April 74
May 74
June 74
2.10
2.07
1.95
2.15

2.25
2.13
2.19
2.11
2.13

2.16
2.25
2.19
2.18

2.23
2.13
2.15
2.03
2.03

1.92
2.02
2.02
2.11
2.02

2.05
1.97
1.88
1.90
  96
  86
  60
  81

  98
  85
  65
1.67

1.60
1.58
1.88
1.91
                                -199-.

-------
                        TABLE 32

           HIGH SULFUR OIL ASH ANALYSIS


METHOD OF TEST:          Emission Spectroscopy

SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION:   Sample #1235


     Ash, %                                    0.046

     Semi-Quantitative Spectrographic Analysis of Ash:

     Vanadium                                  A
     Nickel                                    3B
     Sodium                                    B
     Tin                                       3C
     Silicon                                    3C

     Calcium                                    C
     Iron                                       C
     Magnesium                                 C
     Aluminum                                 3D
     Boron                                     3D

     Barium                                   3D
     Cobalt                                    3D
     Cadmium                                 3D
     Copper                                    D
     Chromium                                  D

     Molybdenum                                D
     Lead                                       D
     Strontium                                  D
     Titanium                                   D
     Manganese                                3E
     Silver                                      E
     Key:   A = Greater Than 10%      E = .001 - .01%
            B = 1 - 10%               F = .0001 - .001%
            C = . 1 - 1. 0%             G = Less Than . 0001%
            D = . 01 - . 1%            3B = Three Times  Letter Value
                           -200-

-------
                          TABLE  33
 REGENERATED MgO VANADIUM AND NICKEL CONTENT
Date                      % Vanadium                % Nickel
6-12-73
7-3-73
7-19-73
7-27-73
9-12-73
11-5-73
11-6-73
12-4-73
12-5-73
0.43
0.55
0.69
1.55
0.45
1.00
0.80
0.83
0.83
0.085
0.100
0.093
0.374
0.136
0.134
0.170
0.08
0.08
                             -201-

-------
              10.0  FINANCIAL DATA
          Project costs are presented in this section for the plants
construction and for their operation, this data is summarized in Table
34.  A description of some guide lines and recommendations for the
operating requirements of future plants is also presented and used in a
comparison with cost data developed in a separate study to provide a
basis for economic evaluation of the process.
                                  -202-

-------
     10.1      Systems Cost

               Chemico - Basic Magnesia
               F. G.D. System at Mystic Station

               Regeneration Plant and Acid
               Plant Modification

               Tail Gas Scrubber
                   Total System Cost
     10. 2  '    System Operation
l
NJ
O
U)
F. G.D. System Operation &
Maintenance

Regeneration Plant Operation
and Maintenance

Project Management

   TOTAL OPERATIONS COST
                                                 TABLE 34

                                        SUMMARY OF FI NANC1AL DATA




                                     S3,635,000

                                      2,294,220


                                        238,110
                                     $6,167,330
 Pre Start Up
   Through
Break In Period

 $ 573,591
                                                       747,717


                                                       488,872

                                                   $1, 810, 180
                                                         pi "
                                                                                          PERIOD

                                                                           --, eel Operational     Continuous
                                                                            Testing            Operations
$ 619,418


   578,716


   260,800

$1,458,934
$326,116


 391,564


  94,500

$812,260
                                       Project
                                     Termination
                                                                                                                 Total
$ 89,843      $1,608,968


               1, 717, 997


  34,582          878,834

$124,425      $4,205,799

-------
10.1      SYSTEMS COST

          The costs of the prototype plants are presented for the
F. G. D. System in Table 35 and for the regeneration system plus
the cost of modifications to the acid plant in Table 36.

          These are broken down to show total costs by specific
catagories identified by Chemico standard codes.  (The equipment
included in each of these sections has been listed in Tables  11 and
12 of Section 5).

10.1.1    System Cost Details

                          Table 35

                 MAGNESIA F. G. D. SYSTEM
Chemico
Cost Code
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
Q


Description
Foundations
Buildings
Structural Steel
Ductwork
Tanks
Storage Bins
Pumps
Fans
Machinery
Material Handling Equipment
Special Equipment
Insulation
Piping
Instruments
Electrical
Painting
Sitework
Sub Total

Cost *
$ 229,456
17,351
303,338
522,751
29,798
22,138
86,938
151,973
1,826
261,053
462,102
52,578
271,960
166,838
153,581
28,942
205,646
$2,979,415
          Site clearance and preparation)
          Initial MgO charge, etc.       )              655,585
                         Total System Cost          $3, 635, 000

                    * Includes Engineering Cost
                                -204-

-------
                          TABLE 36
10.1.2  System Cost Details
           Regeneration Plant and Acid Plant
                     Modifications
Chemico
Cost Code
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
I
J
K
0
P
R
S
T
U
V
W
X
Y
Z


Description
Foundations $
Buildings
Structural Steel
Ductwork
Heat Exchangers
Tower
Tanks
Storage Bins
Pumps
Fans
Material Handling Equipment
Dust Collection
Calciner
Insulation
Piping
Instruments
Electrical
Catalyst
Painting
Sitework
Leasing
Total $2

Cost *
176,942
57,342
166,342
24,774
40,803
6,611
16,888
52,487
13,579
38,096
86,743
9,970
584,811
44,447
424,791
72,994
179,433
1,926
23,018
55,357
216,866
,294,220
          *  Includes  Engineering  Costs
                         - 205 -

-------
10.2      OPERATING COSTS

          Operating costs for the F. G.D. installation at Mystic
Station are shown in Table 37.   These costs are separated to show ex-
penses for operating labor, utilities and maintenance as  well as costs
that can be identified as specific to the test program. A further
separation is provided to show the costs incurred during the three
principal periods of the test program.

          Similar information is shown in Table 36 for the regenera-
tion section. Included in this table is  the expense for maintaining the
laboratory and testing facilities at both sites and field administration
costs. Because modifications and maintenance of the calciner and
material handling equipment constitutes the largest percentage of the
maintenance costs these areas have been identified  separately in this
section.

          Table 37 presents the project management cost details as
a separate item.   Almost all of these costs are specific to operation
of a prototype system, administration of the test and development
effort, data handling and report preparation.

10. 3      PEOCESS ECONOMICS

          The program described in this report combined elements
of process development and pilot plant work with normal start-up
procedures for the prototype system.  Similarly, maintenance work
on the unit was often in the form of modifications to pieces of its
equipment.  Because  of these aspects,  it is not possible  to determine
operating costs directly from the data.  Instead, the information
contained in this section has been combined with the observations and
findings of the program to provide guidelines for establishing speci-
fications for future plants and required quantities of materials for
plant  operations.

          A source of data on process economics for the MgO slurry
F. G. D. System is the Environmental Protection Agency  Report,
"Conceptual Design and Cost Study-Sulfur Oxide Removal from Power
Plant Stack Gas-Magnesia Scrubbing-Regeneration" (10) which pre-
sents economics for a variety of plant sizes and configurations.
                                  -206-

-------
   10. 2. 1       Operating & Maintenance Cost Details
                F. G.D.  System - Boston Edison Co.
                                                              TABLE 37
NJ
O
Operations
  Labor* (Incl.  Supv. )
  Electricity
  Fuel Oil (for dryer)
  Water
  Steam

Maintenance
  Labor*
  Supplies*
  Spare Parts*

Subtotal O&M

Test Program Costs
  Training Program*
  Cleanup*

Subtotal Test Program

Termination & Mothballing Costs*

TOTAL F. G. D. SYSTEM COSTS
Pre-Startup
Thru Break-In
Period
$232, 324
26,421
13, 806
3,476
6, 858
134,090
67, 842
- 0 -
484,817
6,401
82, 373
88,774

$573,591
Planned
Operational
Testing
$212, 169
33, 195
15, 980
3, 958
2, 599
180, 955
55, 213
50, 947
555,016
64, 402
64,402

$619,418
Continuous Project
Operations Termination
SI 15, 408
45,743
25,024
4,740
2, 756
59,881
52,742
- 0 -
306, 294
19,822
19,822
$89,843
$326,116 $89,843
Total
$ 559,901
105,359
54,810
12,174
12, 213
374, 926
175,797
' 50, 947
1, 346,127
6,401
166,597
172, 998
89,843
$1, 608, 968
                               *Incl. 50% General Overhead or Mark-Up

-------
        10. 2. 2      Regeneration Plant Operations Cost Details
                    Including Maintenance & Modification Plus
                    Testing and Quality Control Program
                                                                   TABLE 38
O
03
I
Administrative Costs
  Field Office (1)
  Field Transportation (Boston & Rumford)

  Home Office
   Salaries (Incl. Overhead)
   Miscellaneous (Incl.  Communication &
                  Reproduction           )

  Payroll Taxes & Insurance

  Travel & Living Expense

Subtotal Administration
                     Operations Costs
                       Essex Chemical Leasing Fees

                       Operating Costs
                         Operating Labor (Incl. Overhead)
                         Downtime
Pre-Startup Planned
Thru Break- In Operational
Period Period
$ 52,
5,
41,
2,
4,
3,
$110,
262
400
649
712
970
928
924
head for Field
152
98
,372(2)
,297
468
$33,
3,
33,
6,
3,
3,
$83,
466
200
893
016
890
435
900
Continuous
Operations
$16,512
1,000
13,
2,
1,
2,
$37,
019
756
992
486
761
Total
$102,
9,
88,
11,
240
600
561
480
10,852
9,
$232,
849
585
Accountant
72
60
,398
, 300
383
55
37
,600
,704
144
280
196
,370
,301
995

-------
                                                             TABLE 38
                                                             (Continued)
10. 2. 2
 (Cont'd)
 l
 10
 o
 kD
 I
   Utility Costs
    Fuel Oil
    Cooling Water
    Electricity

                       (3)
   Operating Chemicals
    MgO (makeup)
    Coke
    Other Chemicals

•   Transportation (MgO &

Subtotal Operations
Pre-Startup
Thru Break-In
Period"
22, 081
2, 538
21, 508
47,629
5,430
1,474
13, 807
$365, 604
Planned
Operational
Period
23,914
2, 983
15, 386
64,152
5, 827
904
25,964
$272,211
Continuous
Operations
30,814
2,046
10,951
41,073
2, 192
3, 294(4)
23,017
$206,835
Total
76,809
7,568
47, 845
152,854
13,449
5, 672
62,788
$844,651
                          (2)
                          (3)

                          (4)
                                         Includes leasing costs from 10/71
                                         Includes freight
                                         Includes $2, 928 caustic for tail gas scrubber system
             Maintenance Costs
               Spare Parts

               Plant Maintenance Labor
               Essex Supplied Material

               Outside Maintenance' '
                Routine Maintenance & Supplies
               Code O  Bins/Mat'l Handling/Pulverizer
               Code R  Calciner Modifications
                                                   21,354
21,354
30, 631
17, 133
21,557
13,259
13,271
9,238
2,483
23,066
17,676
11, 292
3, 654
3,731
8,061
13,369
6,404
43, 523
23, 347
52, 684
44, 304
30, 967

-------
           10.2.2
NJ
!-•
O
TABLE 38
(Continued)
(Cont'd)
Pre-Startup Planned
Thru Break-In Operational
Period Period
Miscellaneous Tools & Supplies 8, 504
Subtotal Maintenance $1 25, 709
(5)
Includes Subcontract Labor
Quality Control & Testing Costs
Salaries (Incl. Supervision & Overhead)
F. G. D. Plant at Mystic Station 983
Regeneration Plant 131,807
Material and Supplies 11,660
Laboratory Trailer (F. G. D. Plant) 1,030
Special Test Work
Stack Analyses (F. G. D. Plant)
Spectrometric Characterization
Metallurgical Testing
Subtotal $145,480
TOTAL REGENERATION PLANT COSTS $747, 717
6, 913
$ 70,668
& Shipping Costs
55, 218
69, 799
5, 531
1., 030
20,359

$151, 937
$578,716
Continuous
Operations
4, 631
$ 39,850

41, 298
39,709
10, 974
734

11,682
2,720
$107, 117
$391,564
Total
20,
$ 236,
-
97,
241,
28,
2,
20,
11,
2,
$ 404
$1,717
048
227

499
315
315
794
359
682
720
, 534
, 997

-------
                                                              TABLE 39
          10. 2. 3
Project Management Cost Details
i
ro

Direct Salaries ,, >
Field Costs, (Incl. Operating Supvr. )
Home Office, (Incl. Engineering)^ )
Outside Engineering & Inspection
Miscellaneous (Incl. communication &
Reproduction )
Payroll Taxes & Insurance
Travel & Living Expense
TOTAL PROJECT MANAGEMENT
PrerStartup
Thru Break-In
Period
$106, 212
275,732
33,360
13,239
10,297
50,032
$488,872
Planned
Operational
Testing
$ 84, 265
117,190
11, 156
15, 121
5,436
27,632
$260,800
Continuous Project
Operation Termination
$43,520 $ -0-
25,978 34,582
799
9,895
2,925
11,463
$94,580 $34,582
Total
$233, 997
453,482
45,315
38,255
18, 658
89,127
$878,834
              (1) Includes Overhead

-------
          In order to apply the findings of this study to improving
economic predictions for the magnesia slurry F. G. D.  process, a
comparison of costs is made for one case presented in the "Conceptual
Design and Cost Study" using costs developed from the guidelines re-
sulting from this work.

          The case chosen is a Magnesia Slurry Absorption-Regenera-
tion System for a 200 MW, coal fired unit,  3. 5% S in fuel and a 150
TPD sulfuric acid plant.  (11)  An advantage  of this case is that it in-
tegrates all of the facilities from the boiler to the  acid plant  at a sin-
gle site which eliminates the uncertainty associated with estimating
transportation and  storage costs.

          Following are some of the significant aspects used in de-
veloping the manufacturing costs:

          A.  Delivered Raw Material  - Measurement of system
losses during the controlled run  indicate an MgO makeup rate
equal to 5% of the feed is reasonable.

          B.  Conversion Costs  - Labor- Successful operation of
the F. G. D.  System was attained with the assignment of one control
operator and one auxiliary operator per shift. It should  be noted
that this  staff could handle two trains of equipment.
Regeneration plant and acid plant operation is accomplished with
two operators plus  one roving operator per shift.

          Utilities  - Fuel Oil - The higher fuel consumption of the
dryer in the study was related to the reduced efficiency caused by
the modification noted.  Future installations would employ properly
designed dryers, therefore fuel consumption  can oe estimated by
conventional  methods.  No provision is made for reheat as no
separate reheat was used in the prototype operation.

          Steam - MgO slaking at 180 F is provided by direct
steam  sparging.
                                 -212-

-------
         C.  Maintenance - Despite the high costs normally associated
with maintenance and modifications of a prototype system,  actual
maintenance costs incurred were only 5|% of erected value for the
F. G. D. unit and 4-3/4% for the regeneration plant.  Using this basis,
a 5% maintenance charge appears conservative.

         D.  Analysis - Reliance on wet chemical methods for criti-
cal control characteristics of the F. G. D.  and regeneration system
plus the normal requirements of the  acid plant mandate close analyti-
cal support.  One chemist per shift plus supervision and supplies  are
included.

         Table 40 summarizes the fixed investment costs using the
format developed in the E. P. A.  study.  In both cases the design
parameters are as follows:

                       200 MW coal fired unit
                       3|% sulfur in the coal
                SO2 removal                  90%
                Plant on  stream time          80%
                Coal consumption             554, 200 T/Yr.
                Heat rate                     9, 500 BTU/kwh

         The E. P. A. study noted the inclusion of stack reheat by steam
to 175 F though no costs  were included for operation.  No  reheat is
included in our comparison as the prototype plant did not employ reheat.

         Table 41 summarizes the manufacturing costs,  again using
the E. P. A. format.  It should be noted that only the direct costs are
listed,  no  allowance is made for revenue from the sale of sulfuric
acid or for depreciation and other indirect costs as these will vary
from the viewpoint of either the  utility or chemical manufacturer.

         Other arrangements for processing the products from this
F. G. D. system have been proposed.   In one of these a tariff is paid
by the power plant to an acid manufacturer to regenerate the absorbent.
A study* of the plan, based on a  $15/ton differential cost between high
and low sulfur coal, has shown a saving to the utility of 1. 6 mills/kwh
while paying a processing fee sufficient to provide a 25% before-tax
return on investment to the chemical company.  Similar economics
obtain for  a fuel oil fired power plant at a $3/bbl differential between
high and low sulfur fuel.

        * Additional information is presented in the E. P. A.  Capsule
         Report on Magnesia Scrubbing (EPA 625/2-75-007).
                               -213-

-------
                                                                  TABLE 40
                                               SUMMARY OF ESTIMATED FIXED INVESTMENT
                                          MAGNESIA SLURRY SCRUBBING-REGENERATION PROCESS^
                                      (200-MW New Coal-Fired Power Unit,  3. 5%S in Fuef;T50~TPD~H~2SO4)


                                                                                           From EPA Cost Study        From This Study
                                                                                           	Investment, $ ^'	        Investment, $'2'

Land, site clearance,  excavation, landscaping, roads, railways, walkways                           200, 000                        -0-
Particulate scrubbers (2 scrubbers with surge tanks,  agitators, pumps, and fly
  ash neutralization and disposal facilities)                                                       1, 445, 000                  3, 790, 000
Sulfur dioxide scrubbers.(2 scrubbers with surge  tanks, agitators,  pumps,
  mist eliminators and fans)                                                                     1, 602, 000                  4, 360, 000
Optional bypass duct around scrubbers                                          •                    209,000                        -0-
Slurry processing (screens, tanks, pumps, agitators  and heating coils,
  purification facilities, centrifuges,  and conveyors)                                                 416,000                 (2,510,000
Drying (drying system, dust collectors, conveyors and MgSOs  storage hopper)                        470, 000                 (
Calcining (calcining system, fans,  MgO and coke  storage hoppers,
  feeders,  conveyors,  elevators, waste heat boiler, dust collectors)                                  635,000                  1,830,000
Magnesium oxide slurrying (MgO unloading and storage facilities,  feeders,
  conveyors,  elevators, slurry tank,  agitator, and pumps)                                            140,000                    410,000
Sulfuric  acid plant (complete contact  unit for sulfuric  acid production,
  dry gas purification system)                                                                    1, 495,000                  4, 500, 000'4^
Sulfuric  acid storage  (storage and shipping facilities for 30 days
  production of H2SO4)                                                                              108,000                        -0-
Fuel oil  storage (fuel oil storage and distribution  system including storage
  tank, hold tanks, heat exchanger, transfer and feed  pumps)                                          94, 000                        -0-
Control room building,  including motor controls,  laboratory, and lockers                             150,000                 Included Above
Service facilities and buildings allocation for maintenance, shops, and offices                         410, 000                        -0-
     Subtotal direct investment                                                                  7, 374, 000                 17,400, 000

Engineering design and supervision                                                                  664,000                (
Construction expense                                                                               811,000                (Included Above
Contractor fees                                                                                    442,000                (
Contingency                                                                                        959, 000                (
     Subtotal fixed capital investment                                                          10, 250, 000                 17,400, 000

Allowance  for startup and  modifications                                                          1, 025,000                 Included Above
Interest  during construction (8%/annum rate)                                                        410, OOP                        -0-
      Total fixed capital investment                                                              11, 685, 000                 17,400, 000
(1) 1972 Costs
(2) 1975 Costs
(3) "Dry" Sulfuric Acid Plant & Tail-Gas Scrubber
(4) Double Absorption Sulfuric Acid Plant

-------
                                                                      TABLE 41

                           ANNUAL MANUFACTURING COSTS FOR 98% H2SO4 FROM SCRUBBED POWER PLANT STACK GAS
                           	MAGNESIA SLURRY SCRUBBING-REGENERATION	
                                               "T200-MW Existing Coal-Fired"~Power Unit,  3. 5%TrTn Fuel)
                                                           From EPA Cost Study
                                                                                 (10)
                                                  Annual
                                                  Quantity
Delivered raw material
   Lime
   Magnesium oxide (98%)
   Coke
   Catalyst
      Sub-Total raw material

Conversion Costs
   Operating labor and supervision

   Utilities
      Fuel Oil
      Steam
   Heat Credit
   Process Water
   Electricity

Maintenance
   Labor and Material, . 07 x $13, 083, 000

Analyses
   Sub-Total conversion costs
   Total direct costs

(1)1972 Costs
(2)1975 Costs
       56. 6 tons
      463 tons
      322 tons
      760 liters
   30, 440 man-hr
3, 166, 000 gal
        -- M Ib
    8, 600 MM Btu
      931 MM gal
        28. 2 MM kwh
                                                                            Unit Cost
 16. 00/ton
102. 40/ton
 23.50/ton
  1. 51/liter
                            6. 00/mh
  0. 09/gal
  0. 60/M Ib
  0. 40/MM Btu
  0. 05/M gal
  0. 007/kwh
5. 5%S in Fuel)
Total*1 >
Annual
Cost
$
900
47,400
7,600
1, 100
~57,000
182, 600
284, 900
(3,400)
46,600
197,300
915,800
45,000
1, 668, 800
1, 725,800
From
Annual Quantity .
-0-
875 tons
490 tons
2, 700 liters
50, 000 man-hr.
2, 890, 000 gal.
4MM Ib
-0-
400 MM gal
34 MM kwh
. 05x$17, 400, 000



This Study .
Unit Cost(c)
$
150/ton
80/ton
1. 25 'liter
8. 00/mh
0. 298/gal
2/M Ib
0. 25/M gal
0. 01 /kwh





Total(2)
Annual
Cost
S
-0-
131, 250
39, 200
3, 375
173.T25
400, 000
861. 220
8,000
-0-
100, 000
340, 000
870, 000
100, 000
2, 679, 220
2, 853, 045
                                                                    Note:  Direct cost 2 mills/kwh (80% rating^
                                                                                      8
-------
 H.O                    REFERENCES


 1)  Kerr,  C. P.  Sulfur Dioxide Removal in Venturi Scrubbers.  I & EC,
          Process Design 1_3, No.  3, 222 (1974).       :

 2)  Smithson,  G. L. and Bakhshi.  Kinetics and Mechanism of the Hydration
          of Magnesium Oxide in a Batch Reactor.  Canadian Journal of Chemical
          Engineering, 47, 10,508      (1969).

 3)  Evans,  R.L. and St. Clair, H.W. Carbonation of Aqueous Suspensions
          Containing Magnesium Oxides and Hydroxides.  I & EC, 41, 2814 (1969).

 4)  Yost, D. M. and Russel,  H. Systematic Inorganic Chemistry.  New  York:
          Prentice Hall,  Inc. (1946^

 5)  Epstein, M.  E.P. A. Alkali Scrubbing Test Facility:  Sodium Carbonate
          and Limestone Test  Results.  .EPA - 650/2-73-013,  (August  1973).

 6)  Kovache,  T., Bakalov, V. and Trendafelov, D.  Attempts to Obtain Lower
          Hydrates of MgSOq and the Anhydrous Salt.  Khimiya i Industriya
          Sofia, 4_2,  5, 209 (1970).

 7)  Hagesawa, H.  On Magnesium Sulfite.  Bull.  Inst. Phy. Chem.  Research
          (Tokyo) 12, 976 (1933).

 8)  Sass, Allan.  Simulation of the Heat Transfer Phenomena in a Rotary Kiln.
          I & EC Process Design and Development  6, No.  4, 532 (1967).

 9)  Brink, J.  A.  Cascade Impactor for Adeabatic Measurements.  I  &  EC,
          5£, No.  4, 645 (1958).

10)  McGlamery,  G. G. et al, Conceptual Design and Cost Study - Sulfur
          Oxide Removal from Power Plant Stack Gas  - Magnesia Scrubbing.
          Regeneration.  EPA-R2-73-244 (May 1973)

11)  Op cit,  pg 206.
                                 -216-

-------
    12.0            LIST OF PUBLICATIONS
 1)  Sulfuric Acid from the Stack.  Chemical Week,  197 (3) (1970).

 2)  Shah, I. S.,  Wechselblatt, .P.M., Radway, J.E.  SOp  Recovery from
         Smelters with Magnesium Base SO? Recovery Process.  AIME
         Environmental Quality Conference,  Washington, D.C. (June 1971)

 3)  Shah, I. S.  Removing SO9 and Acid Mist with Venturi  Scrubbers.  CEP,
         (May 1971) Vol.  67,  No. 5.

 4)  Kleiman,  G. and Willett, H.  Relative Economics of Stack Gas Scrubbing
         US Residual Oil  Desulfurization.  API Session on  Desulfurization and
         SO2 Recovery San Francisco,  Calif.,  (May 12,  1971).

 5)  Shah, I. S.,  Quigley, C.P.  Magnesium  Base SO? Recovery Process, A
         Prototype Installation.  70th AIChE  National Meeting, (August 1971).

 6)  Wechselblatt,  P.M., Quig,  R.H.  Magnesium Base SO? Recovery Scrubbing
         Systems.  71st AIChE National Meeting,  (February 1972).

 7)  Maxwell, M. A., Koehler, G. R.   The Magnesia Slurry SO? Recovery
         Process with a Large Prototype System. 65th AIChE Annual Meeting,
         (November 1972)

 8)  Quigley, C.P.  Progress Report - Magnesium Oxide System at Boston
         Edison Company's Mystic Station.  Electrical Worlds Technical
         Conference, Chicago, (October 1972).

 9)  Houston, P. and Koehler, G.  Application of Magnesia SOo Control System
         to a 150 MW Power Plant.  International Conference on SO2 Control,
         Manchester,  England (April 1973).

10)  Koehler, G. R.  (Part I) and Quigley,  C.P. (Part II)  Operational Performance
         of the Chemico Basic Magnesium Oxide System at the Boston Edison
         Company     Flue Gas Desulfurization Symposium.  New Orleans,
         (May 1973).  (EPA-650/2-73-038, December 1973).

11)  Radway,  J.E.  and Rohrbach, R.R.  Progress Report  on the Chemico-Basic
         Magnesium Oxide Flue Gas Desulfurization System at the Boston Edison
         Company.  Presented at the 30th  Annual Meeting,  East Central Section
         APCA,  Cleveland, Ohio (September 26,  1973).
                                 -217-

-------
                  LIST OF PUBLICATIONS (CONT'D)
12)  Maxwell,  M.A.  Application of the Magnesia Slurry SO? Recovery Process
         to Stack Gas Desulfurization.  Paper presented at 25th Southeastern
         Regional Meeting, American Chemical Society, Charleston, S. C.
         (November 8,  1973).

13)  Koehler, G. R.   New England SO2 Recovery  Project - System Performance.
         66th AIChE  Annual Meeting, Philadelphia (November 1973).

14)  Koehler, G. R.   Alkaline Scrubbing Removes Sulfur Dioxide.  Chemical
         Engineering Progress, 70, No. 6, 74.

15)  Koehler, G.R. and Dober,  E.  Magnesia SO2 Absorption,  Process Develop-
         ment .  Flue Gas Desulfurization Symposium,  Atlanta, Ga.
         (November 1974) (EPA-650/2-74-126).

16)  Quigley, C.P. and Burns, J. A.  Assessment of Prototype Operation and
         Future Expansion Study - Magnesia Scrubbing Mystic  Generating Station
         Boston, Massachusetts (Ibid).

17)  Erdman, D.A.   Mag-Ox Scrubbing Experience at the Coal-Fired Dickerson
         Station. Ptomac Electric Power Company.   Washington, D.C. (Ibid).

18)  Zonis, I. S., Olmsted, F. , Hoist, K. A. and Cunningham,  D.M.
         The Production and Marketing of Sulfuric Acid From the Magnesium
         Oxide Flue Gas Desulfurization Process.(Ibid).

19)  Koehler, G.  Report of Operation of a Magnesia FGD System on and Oil
         Fired Boiler.  AIChE Symposium Series, No.  148,  (July 1975).
                                -218-

-------
13.  CONVERSION FROM ENGLISH TO METRIC UNITS
 To Convert from
 atmosphere (normal)
 atmosphere (normal)
 barrel (42 US gallons)
 British thermal unit (Btu)
 Btu/hour
 Btu/pound mass
 Btu/pound mass - °F
 foot
 foot2
 foot3
 foot /minute
 foot-pound force
 gallon (US)
 gallon (US)/minute
 grain
 horsepower
 inch
 inch H2O (60°F)
 pound force
 pound mass av
 pound mass av
 pound force/inch
 pound mass/foot^
 °Rankine
 ton mass (US short)
 ton mass (US long)
 To
.bar
 pascal
 meter^
 joule
 watt
 joules/gram
 joules/gram - °K
 meter
      O
 meter
 meter
 meter ^/minute
 joule
 meter^
 meter'3/hour
 milligram
 kilowatt
 centimeter
 kilopascal
 newton
 kilogram
 metric ton (tonne)
 kilopascal
 kilograms /meter
 °Kelvin
 kilogram
 kilogram
Multiply by
1.01325
101,325
0.15899
1055.1
0.29307
2.32600
4.18680
0.30480
0.09290
0.02832
0.02832
1.35582
0.00379
0.22712
64.7989 '
0.74570
2.5400
0.24884
4.44822
0.45359
0.0004536
6.89476
16.0185
0.55556
907.185
1016.05
                          -219-

-------
                      APPENDIX "A"
              MAGNESIUM SULFITE HYDRATES
                TRANSITION & FORMATION
      Process considerations  are given  to  the  existence  of
the two hydrates of MgS03 which have differing physico-
chemical properties as the absorption processes are normally
operated near the transition  temperature region for these
hydrates.
      MgS03*3H?0 - MqS03'6H20 Transition
      It has been observed  (6) that the transition of
MgS03-6H20 to MgS03-3H2 at 40°C  (104°F) is negligible.  A
measurable, although still slow  transition can be observed
at 65°  (149°F) and at 70°C  (158°F) the transition is completed
in 10 hours.
      Further studies (7) indicated that at 15°C  (59°F) and
at 35°C  (95 °F) no transformation of MgS03«6H2O to MgS03.3H20
occurred.  Also in this work, the concentration of MgS04 in
solution was varied from 0 to 30%.  With high MgS04 concentra-
tion in the solution the sulfite crystals were highly contami-
nated (to the extend of 40%) MgS04-  At 55°C  (141°F) and at
75°C (167°F) rapid transformation of the hexahydrate to tri-
hydrate occurred.  These authors were of the opinion that
MgS04 solutions aid in the transformation of hexahydrate to
trihydrate.
      Since the temperature of the absorber at Boston is 135°F
and no such rapid transformation of the hydrates was observed,
a study of the transition of the two hydrates was undertaken
using the following procedure :
                            220

-------
      Slurries were prepared with a composition similar to
that obtained in normal operation and were placed in glass-
stoppered bottles.  The bottles were placed in a constant
temperature bath.  After a predetermined period of time
the bottles were taken out and the contents filtered
immediately, washed with methanol and dried in air and at
40°C.  The crystals were analyzed for sulfite, sulfate,
and MgO content.
      The ratio of the two hydrates in the crystals was
analyzed using a chemical method developed at Chemico's
laboratory.  This method is discussed in Appendix C,
Analytical Techniques.

      RESULTS
      At room temperature  (in contact with water) the tri-
hydrate is converted to the hexahydrate.  This transforma-
tion also takes place in 8% MgSO^ solution.  But when the
concentration of MgSC>4 in solution reaches 15% or above,
no further transition to hexahydrate occurs.  In this
transition the crystal size of the resultant hexahydrate
becomes 8 to 10 fold larger than the original trihydrate
crystals tending to support the hypothesis that the crystals
first dissolve in the solvent and then crystallize out in
the other form.  In contrast to the trihydrate, the hexa-
hydrate appeared to change over to the trihydrate with the
rise in concentration of MgS04 in solution.  However, con-
flicting results were obtained in this study and, consequent-
ly, no firm conclusions could be drawn.  Table A-l summarizes
the room temperature data.
                         221

-------
      In our study, no transition of the hexahydrate to
trihydrate was observed at 135°F  (57°C), even after 48
hours, nor was the catalytic effect of MgS04 claimed by
Kbvachev and others observed.  The transition temperature
of MgS03-6H20 to MgS03«3H20 appears to be a few degrees
above 135°F and most probably at 138°F.  The pH of the
medium seems to have some effect on the rate of transition
of the hydrates.  It appears (Table A-2) that alkaline pH
retards while acid pH favors the rate of transition.  In
summary, the major factor in the transition of the hexa-
hydrate to trihydrate appears to be temperature.  The
transition temperature is 138°F (59°c).  MgSC>4 does not
appear to play a significant role in the transition.  On
the other hand, pH and presence of trihydrate do have some
effect on the rate and temperature of transition.
                         222

-------
                         Table A-l

                     MAGNESIUM SULFITE
          HYDRATE TRANSITION AT ROOM TEMPERATURE
Conditions for Digestion   Trihydrate
1. in 8% MgSC>4 solution    All
   for 24 hrs.             Hexahydrate
               Hexahydrate
               No change
2. In 15% MgSO4
   a.  20 Hrs.

   b.  64 Hrs.

   c.  97 Hrs.
No Change

No Change
Mostly hexa with
some trihydrate
40% 6H20
60% 3H20
No change
3. In 20% MgS04
   a.  20 Hrs.

   b.  64 Hrs.

   c.  72 Hrs.
   d.  97 Hrs.
No Change

No Change
80% 6H20
20% 3H20
40% 6H20
60% 3H20
No change
No change
                           223

-------
                      TABLE A-2

              TRANSITION OF MgS03.6H20

              pH ADJUSTED BY OIL. H2S04
Conditions for Digestion
1.  pH 7.00: 138°F.
    45 mins. in water
2. pH 7.00: 135°F.
   45 mins. in water

3. pH 7.10: 140-146°F.
   45 mins. in water

4. pH 7.00: 134-135°F.
   45 mins.; 15% MgS04

5. pH 7.00: 132-134°F.
   45 mins. in water

6. pH 7.15: 134-136°F.
   45 mins. in water

7. pH 7.40: 138-141°F.
   45 mins. in water
                                      Results
                                      All trihydrate
                                      Hexahydrate with few
                                      percent Trihydrate

                                      All trihydrate
                                      All hexahydrate
                                      All hexahydrate
                                      All trihydrate
                                      A little trihydrate
                                      10%:  90% Hexahydrate
                         224

-------
      Magnesium Sulfite Hydrate Formation.      .
      Magnesium sulfite trihydrate  (MgS03.3H20) is formed
in the prototype FGD system after equilibrium is attained.
Laboratory studies were undertaken in an effort to determine
the conditions which led to the formation of each of the
hydrates and the influence of the systems components on
crystal type.  These experiments including the effort to
simulate the reaction occuring in the venturi absorber, were
unsuccessful in duplicating the hydrate formed in the pro-
totype system.
      Two experimental conditions were used:  a) SQ2 at
room temperature was reacted with MgO slurry in (i) water
and in (ii) MgSQ4 solution at 135°F and at a pH of 6.8 to
7.20;  b) SC>2 at 300°F was reacted with MgO slurry in water
at 135°F;  and a pH of 6.80 to 7.20.  The reaction period
in both cases was of 75 minutes and 862 gas (pure) at .a
rate of 200 ml./min. and air at a rate of 3 liters/minute
were added through a glass T-tube connected to a Vycortube
wrapped with heating tape.
      The gas was bubbled through 400 ml. of water containing
1-2 gm. of MgO maintained at a temperature of 135°F in a 600
ml. beaker.  The temperatue of the reaction-beaker was con-
trolled at 135°F by a water-bath.
      The pH of the reaction medium was kept at 6.8-7.2 by
controlled addition of MgO slurry (10% in water).   The whole
reaction lasted 75 minutes.
      After reaction the slurry was filtered and the coke
and filter analyzed.  In all cases the exclusive product
was MgS03.6H20 as shown in Table A-3.
                         225

-------
                                                   TABLE  A-3




                                           REACTION OF SOo with .' MgO
Slurry
Slurry
Temp. (°F) pH
MgS04(%)
S02
Reaction Products
Temp. (°F) Filtrate
Cake
%MgSO4 MgSO3 Hydrate
130-136
130-136
135
135
135
6.8
6.8
6.8
6.8
6.8
-7.2
-7.2
-7.2
-7.2
- 7.2
0
15%
0
0.5
1.4
Amb.
Amb.
300°
300°
300°
0.43
12.1
0.5
1.4
1.3
Hexahydrate
Hexahydrate
Hexahydrate
Hexahydrate
Hexahydrate
Composition %
MgSO3
48.6
46.4
47.9
48.8
48.3
MgSQ4
0.2
1.9
0.3
1.0
0.6
MgO
0.6
1.0
0.7
0.7
1.2
to

-------
                     APPENDIX  B


               PHYSICO-CHEMICAL DATA



It. is well known that magnesium sulfite exists in two forms:  MgSOg


and MgSO3. 3H2O.  A third form (MgSO3. H2O) has been reported but no


evidence of its existence has been found in this study.


X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHIC DATA


X-ray crystallographic study of samples submitted for analyses showed


the hexahydrate is  rhombohedral with space group R3, with three molecules


per unit cell with the following dimensions:


                         a  = 8.820 A

                                  o
                         c  = 9.052 A


The calculated density is 1. 724 gm. /ml. while the measured value is 1. 730


gm. /ml.


The trihydrate is orthorhombic with space group Pbn^.   There are four mole-

                                               o
cules per unit cell:  a,  9.36; b, 9.45;  and c, 5.51 A.  The calculated and


measured densities are  2.138 gm. /ml.  and 2.180, respectively.


The major X-ray spectra for the hydrates are given in Table  B-l.


IR & RAMAN SPECTRAL DATA

                                             -1
          Laser Raman Spectrum. (Solid) in CM


     MgSO3.6H2O                        MgSO3.3H2O


     962 (s)    )                         967.7  (s) triplet
               ) doublet

     944 (s)    )                         477 (m) with shoulder


     482 (m)
                             227

-------
                                          O                          -1
The .laser used was Argon excitation at 4880 A with scanning from 200 cm

          _ i                   '  c   - •           •  '
to 1400 cm  .  (Because of low solubility in water no sharp spectrum could


be obtained in  aqueous medium)..               . .


The infrared study of the two hydrates of MgSOg was conducted in:  KBr


pellet, nujol mull, as well as MIR with KRS-5 plate.  IR spectra of the two


hydrates vs. temperature were also studied and an attempt was .made to cor-


relate the high temperature IR spectra with a DTA study of the-two hydrates.
    ROOM TEMPERATURE SPECTRA OF THE HYDRATES

                                                -1
       IN THE SOLID STATE (KBr PELLET) IN cm
Assignment
'- 1
i 2
'< 3
"' 4
' 5
' 6
Na9SO3
1010
633
941
496


MgSOQ.6H0O
950 (s)
640 (m)
925 (s)
490 (w)


MgSO3. 3H0O
950 (s)
900 (s)
640 (m, sh
400 (m)
450 (w)
850 (ms)
                                                    320 (ms)


                                700 (m)              700 (s)


                                260 (ms)             260 (w)


The 700 cm'1 band in MgSOg. 6H2O and in MgSOg. 3H2O is assigned to


coordinated water.
                             228

-------
From the IR spectrum it appears that the sulfite ion in the hexahydrate has


C3 symmetry while in the trihydrate this symmetry is lowered to Cg.  The


correlation between the  two are as follows:

                                V;      N)
        €3           - 1  ' 2      *  3      Y 4
                      i   ..:  v  /  o  y/   ,\
        Cs          ' 1  ' 3   2    * 5   4   > X6



From the IR data,  as also from chemical reactions and DTA work, two hy-

drates can  be represented structurally  as follows:


        MgSO3.6H2Q                    Mg (H20)6 SO3


        MgS03- 3H20                    Mg (H20)3S03


The two hydrates can be easily distinguished from their  IR s.pectrum by the


320 cm" ,  450 cm"1, and 850 cm'1, bands.  Also, in the hexahydrate the 700


and 640 cm  bands appear as a doublet, but in the trihydrate only the 700


cm   band  is pronounced.  The presence of more bands  in the trihydrate spec-

trum than expected is probably due to the coordination and crystal field effects.



The previous representation of the two  hydrates is also supported by their

reactions with AgNO3 solutions:  (The difference in reaction of the two hy-

drates was  discovered during this work and used as a method of analysis for

them)


        2 Mg(H20)6 S03 + AgNOg	•*-  Mg^ g Ag(SO3)2 + 1/2 Mg(NO3)  +12H2O
        cf .  2Na2SQ3 + AgN03	*~Na3 Ag(SO3)2

                   -2
showing that the SO3   ion is present in the hexahydrate as a salt-like ion.


With the trihydrate the reaction is:


        Mg(H20)3 S03 + 2AgN03	*-Ag2SO3 + Mg(NO3>2 + 3H2O


                              229

-------
                              — p
Because of the presence of SO    inside the coordination sphere and the low
                            o

                                                            -2
ionisation constant of such complexes, the concentration of SOg   ion in solu-


                                       +
tion is too low to form complexes with Ag  and only the insoluble AggSOo salt



is formed.



DTA of the hexahydrate shows two prominent endotherms - one at



130°C, and the other at 240  c,  while the trihydrate gives only one



endotherm  at 240 c.



The two hydrates were heated at 130°c  and 160°C, for extended periods of



time (24 hours or more) in an oven.  The  results are as follows:



         Temperature °c            Tri- _    Hexa- _



         130°C for 7 days            Wt. loss 24%       Wt. loss 44%

                                    Composition       Composition

                                    MgSO3.H2o
         160°C for 94 hrs.           Wt. loss 29.5%      Wt. loss 47%

                                    Composition        Composition

                                    MgSO3.0.5H2O      MgSO3.0.5H2O



IR spectrum of the two hydrates (Table B-2)were taken while being heated at



130°C and 160°c in a heated cell.  After 24 hours  of heating the two hydrates



gave essentially identical  spectrum for the same heating temperature.   The



160°C spectrum contained bands due to sulfate ion present in a complex en-



vironment.  This  suggests that at least up to  160°C the SOg    ion in the tri-



hydrate is still present inside the coordination sphere.  As for the hexahydrate,


           O          9
at about 130 C the SOo   ion enters the  coordination sphere displacing water



and remains there at least up to 160°C,  at which temperature partial oxidation



of sulfite ion takes place.
                              230

-------
PHYSICAL PROPERTIES

The specific gravities of the two hydrates were measured with a pycnometer,

in 2-methyl butanol, in which neither of the hydrates dissolve.

        Hydrate                                   Sp. Gravity

        Magnesium Sulfite Hexahydrate             1. 730 gm. /ml.

        Magnesium Sulfite Trihydrate               2. 18  gm. /ml.

The solubility of the two hydrates in water was also found to be different:

      Hydrate                          %MgSOq In Water      g. /liter

      Magnesium Sulfite Hexahydrate          0.42                8.56

      Magnesium Sulfite Trihydrate           0.76              11.55

Additional data is given in Table B-3.

The solubility of MgSC>3.6H2O increases with the rise in concentration of

MgSC>4 in solution as well as with temperature.

     SOLUBILITY OF MgSO3. 6H2O in MgSO4 SOLUTION

        Cone, of MgSO4 in                      MgSO3
        Soln. (as  %)	                  (in gm. /liter)

                5                                  7.5

               10                                  8.5

               15                                  9.0

               20                                  9.20

               25                                  8.90

NOTE:  At  25% MgSO4 solution the  solubility starts  to decrease.
                             231

-------
    SOLUBILITY OF THE HEXAHYDRATE IN WATER AND




        IN 25% MgSQ4 SOLUTION vs. TEMPERATURE




                                          % MgSOg in
      Temperature °F               Water            25% MgSO4




            70                       0. 75                0. 94




           110                       0.99                1.43




           135                       1.42                2.63




           180                       1.75                5.99




(Since at 180  F the hexahydrate changes over to trihydrate, the solubi-





 lities at 180°F  are probably those of the trihydrate).




  SOLUBILITY  OF THE TWO HYDRATES IN MgSO4 SOLUTION




                                      in Solution
      %MgSO4                Tri-           Hexa-




         15                   1.22           1.02




         25                   1.14           0.94
                             232

-------
                       TABLE B-l




         X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHIC DATA
MgSO3.3H2O                d() 3.35    6.71     4.27     6.71




                           I/I0  100       80       60       80







MgSO3.6H2O                d    3.87    2.74  .   4.40     5.7




                           I/I0  100     100         80       4
                        233

-------
                        TABLE B-2
IR SPECTRA OF THE HYDRATES AT HIGH TEMPERATURE
 Temperature (°c)
 130°
 160°
     Ionic
              -2
     1104 (vs)

     613 (s)
 Band Intensity
 s - strong
 m - medium
 w - weak
vw - very weak
 Hexahydrate

 990 )
     ) (s)
 960 ) triplet
     )
 900 )

 690 (m)

 400 (w)

 320 (s)
 260 (w)

1050 (m)

 900 (s)

 700 (m)

 670 (m)

 390 (m)
 Trihydrate ,

 950 (s) (broad)
 690 (m)

 400 (w)

 350 (sh)

 320 (m)

 260 (vw)

1050 (m)

 900 (s)

 700 (m)

 640 (m)

 390 (m)

 300 (w)
         Complex
         1032 - 1044 (s)

         1117 - 1143 (s)

         970 (m)
         645 (s)
         604 (s)
         438 (m)
    234 -

-------
                      TABLE  B-3




                 SOLUBILITY IN HgO







MgSO3.6H2Q                            MgSO3.3H2o





Temp. °C     % MgSO3                   Temp. °C       % MgSO3





(320F)   o     0.338                     (100.4 °F)  38   1.034




(59°F)   15    0.497                     (107.6°F)  42   0.937




(77°F)   25    0.646                     (122 °F) 50      0.844




(95°F)   35    0.846                     (131 °F) 55      0.817





(113°F)  45    1.116                     (144 °F) 62.5    0.748




(131°F)  55    1.456                 .    (167 °F) 75      0.664




(144°F)  62.5  1.95                      (185 °F) 85      0.623




                                       (203 °F) 95      0.615
                        235

-------
                               APPENDIX  C




        ANALYTICAL TECHNIQUES FOR MAGNESIA MATERIAL









A.  MgO is analyzed by acid-base titration.




    1.   Reagents




         (a)  Standard sulfuric acid 0. 5N.  Reagent grade acid is diluted as:  1 ml.




             of acid is added to 71 ml. of distilled water.  Concentration checked




             by titrating against standard alkali.




         (b)  Standard NaOH 0. 5N solution.  Dissolve 20 gin.  of reagent grade alkali




             in a liter of distilled water.  Concentration is checked by titrating against




             standard potassium hydrogen phthalate.




         (c)  Potassium hydrogen phthalate (0. IN solution). Dissolve 20.4230 gm.




             of reagent grade salt in 1 liter of distilled water.




         (d)  Indicator (mixed).   Dissolve 1.25 gm. of methyl red and 0.825 gm.  of




             methylene blue in 1 liter of 95% alcohol.  The indicator is pink in acid




             and green in alkaline solution.   It is colorless or gray in neutral media.




             Use 10 drops for each titration.




    2.   Apparatus




         (a)  Two 50 ml. automatic burettes attached to plastic'bottles of 15 to 20




             liters capacity.




         (b)  Beakers,  250 and 400 ml.




         (c)  Pipettes,  25 and 50 ml.
                                     236

-------
    (d)  Teflon coated stirring bars.

    (e)  Analytical balance.

    (f)  Magnetic  stirrer.

    (g)  Hot plate.

    (h)  Weighing  paper.



3.   Standardization of Acid and Alkali

    Transfer 50 ml. of standard potassium hydrogen phthalate solution into a

    250 ml. beaker.  Add 100  - 125 ml. distilled water and 10 drops of indica-

    tor.   Put a magnetic  stirring bar inside the beaker and place it on the stir-

    rer and titrate with NaOH.  End point is reached when the indicator changes

    from  pink to green.   Repeat the process.

    Determine the normality of H2SO4 using NaOH as the standard.  Take 25

    ml. of H2SO4  and titrate against NaOH using the above procedure.

        Calculation

        Normality of KHCsH4O4

                  Sample Weight = N
                    20.4230

        Normality of NaOH

                   = 50 x normality of KH4C8H4O4
                              ml.  of NaOH

                   = N (alkali)

        Normality of H2SO4

                   =  	25	  = N (acid)
                     ml. of NaOH x N alkali


                                 237

-------
     4.   Percentage of MgO in the sample

         Weigh accurately 1 gm. of sample for centrifuge cakes, dryer products

         and calciner feeds, but 0. 25 gm. for calciner products, in a 400 ml.

         beaker.   Add 150  - 200 ml. of distilled water and 5-10 ml. of 30% H2O2.

         Heat and boil for one-half hour.  To the hot solution (not boiling) add 50

         ml. of standard  0. 5N I^SC^,  heat for another one-half hour.  Cool to

         room temperature and titrate  with 0. 5N NaOH using the above indicator.

             Calculation

         % MgO = 2.02         (50 x normality of H2SC>4 - ml.  of alkali x normality of)
                 sample weight                                            alkali     )

B.   MgSOs in Samples

     This is determined idiometrically.

    Dissolve 25 gm.  of KI in as little water as possible.  Weigh about 12. 70 gm.  of

    iodine (AE) and dissolve completely in the KI solution.  Any insoluble can be

    filtered through a glass Gooch crucible.  Dilute the clear solution to a liter by

    distilled water.  Store  in a dark bottle.

    Standardize the iodine solution as follows:

         Weight accurately,  as  close as possible, 0. 2 gm. of AR grade As2Og in

         a beaker.  Dissolve in the smallest amount of 40% NaOH solution.  Dilute

         to 200 ml., add a drop of phenolphthalein indicator.  Add, dropwise, 1:1

         H2SOA until the pink color disappears.  Add about 5 gm. of NaHCOs to the

         solution, stir with a magnetic  stirrer and titrate with 0. IN iodine solution

         with starch indicator.
                                     238

-------
         Calculation
              Wt. of AS^OS taken = A
                  0.04948

              Normality of iodine -  _ A
                                   ml. of  12 solution

1.   0. IN Na2S2O3 solution:
    Dissolve 25 gm.  of ^28203. SIH^O per liter.  Add 0. 1 gm. of Borax per

    liter to stabilize the solution.

    Sodium, thiosulfate is standardized titrating against I2 solution with starch

    as indicator.  Take 25 ml.  of Na2S2Oq solution in a 250 ml. beaker, add

    100 - 125 ml. of water and a few drops (10) of starch indicator.  Titrate

    until the blue color persists for  1 minute.

        Normality of ^28203 Solution

               = Normality of Iodine x ml. of 1 2
                    ml. of Na2S2Og Solution

2.  Starch Indicator

    Make a thin paste of about 9 gms. of soluble  starch-in cold water,  then

    add it to one liter of boiling water with constant stirring.  Boil for 2 to

    3 minutes after all the starch has been added.  Cool, add 2 ml. of

    Chloroform to preserve the solution.
                                239

-------
3.   Phenolphthalein Indicator

    Dissolve 1 gm.  of phenolphthalein in 50 ml. of alcohol and add 50 ml. of

    water.  Filter off any insolubles.

    Apparatus

    1.  A brown bottle (1 liter) fitted with a brown automatic burette

        (50ml.).

    2.  An automatic burette attached to a ^28203 reservoir (10 -  15

        liters).

    3.  Pipettes: 10, 25 and 50 ml.

    4.  Magnetic stirring bars.

    5.  Magnetic stirrer.

    Procedure

    Weigh out accurately about 0. 25 gm. of the material.  Add to a beaker con-

    taining 50 ml. of standardized iodine solution.  Stir with a magnetic stirrer,

    add 10 ml. of 1:1  HC1 and titrate immediately with standard sodium thiosul-

    fate solution.  Add 5 ml.  of starch indicator to the beaker as  soon as the

    color of the mixture becomes pale yellow.  Continue titrating until the blue

    color disappears and the solution remains colorless for 30 seconds.

    Calculation

    % SC<2 = 3. 22	x (ml.  of 12 solution x Normality  - ml. of Na2S2C>3
           sample weight                             solution x Normality)

               % MgSO3 = % SO2 x 1. 625
                                240 -

-------
C.  Determination of MgSQ4                                                 ;

    This is determined nephelometrically.  A Hach colorimeter (DRA) was used for

    this determination.

    Apparatus

    1.  Hach Colorimeter (DRA)

    2.  Pipettes: 1, 2, 5 and 10 ml.

    3.  Volumetric flasks.

    4.  Beakers.

    Procedure

    Weigh about  2. 50 gm. of sample accurately in a beaker (250 ml.).  Add 100 ml.  of

    water and 25 ml. of 1:1 HC1.  Boil for one-half hour.  Filter off any insolubles.

    Dilute to 250 ml. in a volumetric flask.

    Take  appropriate volume (1, 2, or 5 ml.) in the bottle provided with the Colori-

    meter.  Add the reagent supplied by Hach, dilute to mark and then read p. p. m.

    from,  the card in the Colorimeter.  (The solution concentration is manipulated in

    such a way that p. p.m. reading is  between 0  - 75).

    Calculation                      •

        % 804 = p.p.m x *'  = A
                 sample weight

        % MgSO4   = 1.  253 x A
                /   = 0.05 for 5 ml. of the original solution
                    = 0.10 for 2. 5 ml. of the original solution
                    = 0.125  for 2.0 ml. of the original solution
                    = 0. 25 for 1 ml. of the original solution
                                   - 241:

-------
D.  Carbon

    Carbon in the sample is determined in Leco semiautomatic combustion fur-

    nace (#572-100).  Follow the procedure described in the Leco instruction

    booklet.

E.  Moisture Analysis

    Two varieties of moisture are recognized in the centrifuge cakes:

                     (1) free or absorbed water

                      (2) combined or chemically bound water

    1.  Free or absorbed water:

        Weigh out a beaker (250 ml.) and record weight.   Add about 50 gm. of

        sample and record weight.  Weigh a filter-paper and a clean watch-glass

        (large  enough to accommodate the filter paper).  Add approximately 70

        ml. of acetone to the sample in the beaker and mix well.  Transfer all the

        slurry (add more acetone if necessary) to the filter paper in a Buchner

        funnel,  and filter under suction.  Wash twice with acetone.   Air-dry the

        sample.  Transfer the paper to the watch-glass and dry in an oven at 40°c

        for one-half hour. Re-weigh the sample and watch-glass and filter paper

        to get the weight of the oven dried sample.

        Calculation

        % Solid = Wt.  of oven dried sample  x 100
                  Wt.  of original sample

        % Free water = 100 - % Solid
                                    242

-------
    2.  Combined Water

        Ground the oven dried sample in a mortar. Place sample (10 g.) on the

        aluminum pan of the Ohaus balance (#610). Adjust the wattage and the

        height of the lamp so  that a temperature of 160  - 165 C is attained at

        the center of the pan.  Heat for 50 minutes.

        Calculation

           % combined water = scale reading.

F.  Other Analyses

    1.  Iron

        Determined colorimetrically using Hatch.  Follow the procedure given in

        water  analysis Handbook by Hatch Chemical Company.  For calculation and

        sample preparation:  Weigh accurately about  1 g. of the sample.  Transfer

        to a 250 ml.  beaker,  add 50 ml. water and 5  ml. of concentrated HC1.

        Boil for 15 minutes.   Filter off insolubles and dilute to 1000 ml.  Take

        suitable aliquots to give a reading of 2 p. p. m. or lower.

        Calculation

           Reading in (p. p. m.) x 25 = mgs. /1000 ml.  = A
                 aliquot

           0.1 A       = % Fe
          sample wt.

        Note:  The pH of the iron solution should be between 3 and 6.

                If too acidic,  adjust pH by adding alkali.
                                     243

-------
2.  Nickel
    Weigh accurately about 1 gm. of sample in a 250 ml. beaker.  Add concen-

    trated HC1 (10 ml.) and 100 ml. of water.  Boil until solution is complete.

    Add 5 ml.  of 30% H2O2 and boil for 15 minutes.  Add NH4C1 (2 gm.) and

    then add NH^OH until it just smells of NHg.  Filter hot, wash the precipi-

    tate with hot water.  Add a few drops of concentrated HC1 until acid.  To

    the hot solution add 25 to 50 ml.  of dimethyl glyoxime solution and then 3

    gms. of solid sodium acetate.  Keep on low heat for at least 1 hour.  Filter

    through a weighed No. 4 glass Gooch crucible - wash with hot water  - dry

    at 110°c. for 1 hour - cool in a desiccator.  Weigh.  The difference in the

    two weights is the weight of Nickel dimethyl glyoxime  complex.

            % Ni = Wt.  of Ni-complex x 0. 2031 x 100
                      Wt.  of sample taken

    Dimethyl glyoxime solution

    Dissolve 0. 6 gm. of dimethyl glyoxime (solid) in 100 ml. of 95% ethyl

    alcohol.  Filter if necessary.

3.   Vanadium

    Weigh accurately about 1 gm. of the sample in a 100 ml.  beaker.  Add

    5 to 10 ml. of concentrated HC1,  heat to dryness, cool,  add 3-5 ml.

    of concentrated H2SC>4 and heat again to dryness (fumes of 803).  Cool.

    Add 50 ml. of water,  boil for one-half hour.  'Filter, wash  and dilute to

    100 ml.
                                244

-------
    Take 10 ml. of the stock solution in a 100 ml.  flask, add 5 ml. of 3%

    H2O2 and 0. 25 g.  of NaF.  Make up to the mark with 2N H2SO4.

    Transfer the solution to the cell and read absorption at 450 m/w.  Then

    determine the p.p.m.  from the graph.

    Calculation

       % V = p. p.m.  x 0.1
            sample wt.

    NOTE:  For 20 ml. of stock solution

       % V = p.p.m.  x 0.05
            sample wt.

    Construction of graph

    Weigh accurately analytical grade ammonium vanadate to make a stock

    solution of 1 mg. of V/ml. (1000 p. p.m.) in 5N Ir^SO^..  Make up solutions

    of 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80,  90 and 100  p. p. m. vanadium content by

    proper dilution.  Proceed as above and plot p. p.m. vs. absorbance curve.

4.  Chloride

    The chloride is determined by AgNC>3 titration.

    Weigh accurately about 1  gm. of the sample in a 250 ml. beaker.  Add 100

    ml.  of distilled water  and 5 ml. of concentrated HNC>3.  Boil until the solu-

    tion is reduced to half its original volume. Filter off any insolubles.  Dilute

    to 200 ml. in a beaker or Erlynmeyer flask, add 5 ml. of 1:1 HNO3, 25 ml.

    of standard AgNC>3,  1-2 ml.  of ferric alum indicator and titrate with stand-

    ard NH^CNS solution until the reddish-brown  color persists on stirring (use

    a magnetic stirring-bar during titration).
                                245

-------
Calculation

ml. of AgNO3 x N of AgNO3 -ml. of NH4CNS x N of NH4CNS = A

% Cl = 0.03546A    x 100
       wt.  of sample

For liquid  samples use the above procedure.  Take 25 to 100 ml. of

liquid sample depending upon chloride content.

mg.  of Cl/liter = 35.46 A	x 1000
                vol. of sample taken

Standard AgNOcj Solution

Dissolve 16. 9870 gm. of reagent grade AgNOo per liter.  Store in a

dark bottle away from direct light.

         Normality of AgNO3  = Wt.  of AgNO3 taken
                                   16.9870

Standard NH4CNS Solution

Dissolve 7. 6  gm. of NH^CNS per liter.  Standardize against AgNO3 solu-

tion.  Take 25 ml. of standard AgNO3 solution in a 250 ml. beaker.  Add

100 ml. of distilled water and  5 ml.  of 1:1 HNO3.  Add 1 ml. of ferric

alum indicator and titrate to reddish-brown  endpoint with NH4CNS.

Calculation

   Normality of NH4 CNS = 25 x Normality  of AgNO3
                            ml. of NH4CNS

Ferric alum indicator

Dissolve 140  gm. of ferric ammonium sulfate (pure) in 400 ml. of water.

Add 10 ml. of 6N HNO3  (390 ml.  of concentrated HNO3 diluted to 1 liter).

Heat if necessary.  Filter off any insoluble.  Cool. Dilute to 500 ml. with

6N HNO3.
                            246

-------
Magnesium and Calcium by EDTA



Preparation of EDTA Solution



Dissolve 37. 2240 gm.  of reagent grade disodium dihydrate salt of EDTA



in 1 liter of water - 0.1M EDTA.  Standardize against AR CaCOg or Mg



salt.  Store in a plastic bottle.



          1 ml.  of 0.1M EDTA = 2. 4320 mg.  of Mg+2




                              = 4. 0080 mg.  of Ca+2




Buffer



Dissolve 67. 50 gm.  of NH4C1 in distilled water.   Add 570 ml. of NH4OH



and dilute to 1 liter.



Indicator

                                            \,.


Dissolve 0. 5 gm. of Eriochrome Black T in 100 ml. of ethyl alcohol.



Add 1 gm.  of  Murexide to 100 gm.  of pure NaCl,  mix well in a mortar.



Store in a bottle.



Ammonium Sulfide  Solution



Saturate 200 ml. of concentrated NH4OH with E^S (keep the solution cold



while passing H2S).  Add 200 ml. of concentrated NH4OH and dilute to 1



liter.



Standardization of EDTA using Ca+2



Weigh any  Ca compound (pure) accurately so that  no more than 0. 5 gm.



of Ca*2 is  present per liter.


                            +2
Take  100 ml.  of standard Ca  solution, add NaOH  solution (4 gm. of NaOH



per liter) until the solution has a pH 12 (check with  pH paper).  At this point



precipitation might take place.  Add a small amount of solid Murexide - NaCl



indicator and titrate with EDTA to a color change of orange to violet.



                               247

-------
Calculation



Molality of EDTA = ml. of EDTA x gm.  of Ca+2 in 100 ml.

                              0.04008



Standardization of EDTA by Mg

                       +2
Weigh any AR grade Mg  salt accurately so that no more than 1 gm. of



Mg+2 is present in 1000 ml.



To 100 ml. of nearly neutral solution add 10 ml.  of buffer and 1 ml.  of



the Black T indicator and titrate from red to clear blue color.



1 ml. of 0.1M EDTA = 0.002432 gm. Mg+2

                   i p        -|_2
Determination of Ca * and Mg  in centrifuge cake, dryer product,  etc.


Weigh accurately 1.5 to 2 gm. of the sample in a 250 ml. beaker.  Add



10 ml. of concentrated HC1 and 10 ml. of water.  Cover the beaker with



a watch glass and heat (on low heat) almost  to dryness.  Add 100 - 150 ml.


distilled water, boil until solution (a few ml. of concentrated HC1 may be



added).  Add 5  gm. of NH4.C1 and NH4OH dropwise  until ammoniacal.  Add


10 ml. of (NH^S solution.  Filter off any precipitate, wash with hot water



and dilute to  1 liter.


         Total Ca+2 and Mg+2



For Mg+2
To 25 ml. of the solution (almost neutral) add 5 ml. of buffer and 10 drops


of Eriochrome Black T indicator.  Titrate (with stirring) to blue endpoint.


Note the ml.  of EDTA  used = 'A1.


For Ca+2
To 25 ml. of stock solution add enough IN NaOH until the pH of the solution


reaches at least 12  (check with pH paper).  Add 0.1 gm. of Murexide - NaCl



                             248

-------
    indicator.  Titrate to violet end point with EDTA.   A mount of EDTA
    consumed  = 'B1 ml.
    Calculation
    For Mg+2
                  A - B = 'C' ml.
    Amount of Mg+2 in 25 ml.
                    = C x molality of EDTA x 0. 02432
                    = C gm.
    In 1000 ml.  = C  x 40 = C gm.
    % Mg+2 =       C	   x 100
                wt.  of sample
    For Ca+2
                +2
    Amount of Ca    in 25 ml.
                = B x molality of EDTA x 0. 04008 = b gm.
                +2                        f
    Amount of Ca    in 1000 ml. = b x 40 = b gm.
    % Ca+2 =        b          x 100
              wt. of sample
6.   Degree of Hydration of MgO
    Determine the percentage of MgO in the sample using the procedure A.
    Place sufficient  amount of the sample in a beaker, add water  to make a
    10-15% slurry.  Place the beaker inside an oil bath (set at the desired tem-
    perature level).   Stir the contents of the beaker with  a stirrer.  Keep the
    beaker in the bath for the desired  period of time.  Filter under suction,
    wash the sample with acetone, dry in an oven at 45 -  50°C  for 1 hour.
    Analyze again for MgO content by procedure  A.
                                249 ~

-------
    Calculation

       % MgO in the sample before hydration = A

       % MgO after hydration = B                                  .

       % Hydration = (A - B) x 3. 22

7.   Determination of the Ratio of MgSO3. 6H2O and MgSO3. 3H9Q in the
               Centrifuge Cake

    The two hydrates of magnesium sulfite behave differently towards silver

    nitrate solutions:

                1 gm. of MgSO3. 3H2O = 2.1450 gm. of AgNO3

                1 gm. of MgSO3.6H2O = 0.4000 gm. of AgNO3

    Reagents

    1.  0. 5N AgNOs solution

    2.  0. IN NH4CNS solution

    3.  Ferric alum indicator

    Procedure

    Analyze the cake for H2O,  MgO, MgSO4 and MgSO3 contents in the usual

    way.

                (a) amount of MgSO4 less than 5%

                               and

                (b) amount of MgSO4 more than 5%.

                For (a) no treatment is necessary.

                For (b) add about  3 gm. of powdered centrifuge cake
                                250

-------
to 200 ml.  of absolute alcohol while stirring.  Stir for one-half hour,

filter under suction, wash with acetone and dry in air.  Repeat the process

until the amount of MgSO4 is below 5%.  (Solubility of MgSO4, 0. 2 gm. /100

ml. of alcohol).

To 25 ml.  of 0. 5N AgNO3 solution in a clean 100 ml. beaker add exactly

1 gm. of sample.  Stir the mixture with a Teflon coated magnetic  stirrer

for 5  minutes.  Filter through a clean sintered glass Gooch crucible (fine).

Wash the precipitate twice with 5 ml.  (each)  of 50/50 methanol-water mix-

ture.

'Dilute the filtrate to 100 ml. in a volumetric flask.  The total amount of

AgNQ3 is determined by titration with standard NH^CNS using ferric alum

as indicator,.

Calculation

100 - (%H20 + % MgSO3 + %MgSO4 + %MgO) = X

% MgO + (%MgSO4 x 2. 05) = Y

Amount of  AgNO3 consumed per 1 gm. of sample = C

Corrected  amount of AgNC>3 consumed = C +  C (X + Y) = D
                                            "Too

Determine  the ratio of MgSO3. 3H2O:  MgSO3. 6H2O from the graph.

Construction of graph

Draw a graph from the data in the following Table.  Plot along X-axis the

ratio  of the two hydrates and the amount of AgNO3 consumed on the Y-axis.
                            •251

-------
Ratio of 3HpQ
	6H2O                     gms. of AgNQ3 consumed

    100/0                                 2.1450

    80/20                                 1.7960

    60/40                                 1.4470

    50/50                                 1.2725

    40/60                                 1.0980

    20/80                                 0.7490

    0/100                                 0.4000

    Note: The following, elements interfere  with this method:

           Sulfide, all Halogens (except Fluoride), Cyanides,

           Thiosulfate.
                      -  252

-------
REACTIVITY TESTS


None of the procedures practiced in the Magnesia   industry e. g. surface

area measurements (by iodine method) or degree of hydration is applicable

to this project.  Hence, the following method was developed in order to

measure the  quality of regenerated MgO.


Magnesium oxide, in aqueous suspension, reacts with sulfur dioxide as:

              MgO + XH20 + S02 	*- MgS03.XH2Q

Magnesium sulfite, being insoluble,  precipitates out of the solution.


From the above  equation:

         40. 31 gm. of MgO reacts with 64. 06 gms. of SO2.

         Thus, the theoretical SO2 removal capacity of MgO is

                        64.06 X-f - 100
                        40.31

The value of  ' T ' being 62. 93.  In this procedure it is assumed that

MgSOo is completely insoluble in water and no  side reactions  occur.


APPARATUS
Pure SO2 gas-cylinder with single stage regulator (Model No. 71) from

Matheson.


Flow meter (Roger Gilmore Industries, Inc.) No.  12 (Cat. No. F-2260A)
                             253

-------
         Two 3 - necked glass flasks (500 ml.)


         Two gas purgers  (sintered glass  extra coarse porosity)


         Magnetic stirrer  (bar and plate)


         500 ml.  Volumetric flasks


         Burettes (50 ml. )


         Pipettes (5 ml. and 2 ml.)
REAGENTS
         Caustic soda


         Starch indicator


         Standard iodine solution


         Standard sodium thiosulfate solution
PROCEDURE
    gas flow is adjusted in such a manner that about 24 gms. of SC>2 pass


through the purger in 20 minutes.  The equipment arrangement for this


test is shown in Fig.  1.




The amount of SC>2 passing through the system for any particular setting


of the rotometer,  is measured by absorption in 50% NaOH and subsequent

                                              i
titration of the sulfite by iodine solution.




From the  amount of SO2 passing  through the system the theoretical amount


of MgO necessary is calculated as follows:
                             254

-------
        Amount of SO2 in grams X 0. 6292 = amount of MgO (in gm. ) required.


The required amount of MgO, calculated as above, is placed in flask No. 1.

The 300 ml. of standard iodine solution,  in the second flask, absorbs any

SO2 that escaped from flask No.  1.


After the passage of SO2 through the system, the whole system is purged

with air or nitrogen to remove any SO2 in the line and transfer it into the

two absorbers.  The pH of the MgSOg-MgO slurry is measured.


The magnesium sulfite slurry is filtered under suction,  washed twice with

water.  The filtrate is diluted to 500 ml. and the  SO2 content determined

idiometrically.  The cake is washed with acetone, air and oven (40°c. ) dried

and analyzed (if desired) for MgO,  MgSO4, MgSO3 and H2O content.  The con-

tents  of iodine flask is also diluted to 500 ml. and the SO2 content is determined.


CALCULATIONS

        Amount of SO2 passed               'a1 gm.

        Amount of MgO taken                'b1 gm.
        (for 'a' gm. of SO2)

        Amount of SO2 in MgSO3 filtrate     'c' gm.

        Amount of SO2 in iodine flask        'd' gm.
                              255

-------
         SO9 removal capacity of MgO = a - (c + d) x 62.93
           I                              b



N.B.  For routine purposes the iodine flask can be discarded,  as


      only a small amount of SO2 escapes from flask No.  1.




REMARKS


The SO2 removal capacity is a pure and arbitrary number.




Because of the nature of assumptions made, e. g. insolubility of MgSC>3


in the slurry, no side reactions, disregarding bisulfite formation,  etc.,


the results obtained are low.  Thus, a value of 40 - 50 is considered to be


good.  Even virgin  MgO, under these circumstances, gives a value of 60 - 65.
                              256

-------
TECHNICAL REPORT DATA . .
(Please read Instructions on the reverse before completing) ': .'"V, ',.. ,-• ,
. REPORT NO. 2.
EPA-600/2-75-057
I. TITLE AND SUBTITLE
The i Magnesia Scrubbing Process as Applied to an
Oil- Fired Power Plant
AUTHORS George Koehler (Chemical Construction) and
James A. Burns (Boston Edison)
3. PERFORMING OR3ANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS
Chemical Construction Corp.
One Penn Plaza
New York, NY 10001
12. SPONSORING AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS
EPA, Office of Research and Development
Industrial Environmental Research Laboratory
Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
3. RECIPIENT'S ACCESSION NO.
5. REPORT DATE
October 1975
6. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE
8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NO.
10. PROGRAM ELEMENT NO.
1AB013; ROAP 21ADA-004
11. CONTRACT/GRANT NO.
CPA 70-114
13. TYPE OF REPORT AND PERIOD COVERED
Final; 6/70-6/74
14. SPONSORING AGENCY CODE
'15. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES
 is. ABSTRACT The rep0r£ gjves results of B. full size demonstration of the magnesia wet-
 scrubbing system for flue gas desulfurization on an oil fired, 150 MW generating
 unit.  The project involved:  design and construction of both an SO2 removal system
 (based on firing 2. 5% sulfur fuel) and an MgO regeneration facility for 50 ton/day
I acid production; and operation of both plants over a 2 year period.  The report shows
 that the system removed  90% of the inlet SO2 and controlled particulate emissions
 from the generating station,  where 4000 hours of operation were logged.  Regener-
 ated magnesia was  recycled successfully and over 5000 tons of acid was marketed
 from the regeneration plant, demonstrating the feasibility of the process.  Corre-
 lations were developed both to determine SO2 removal for varying boiler loads and
 fuel sulfur content, and to control regeneration of acceptable alkali.   Several other
 studies of the process technology and chemistry were undertaken as  part of the work.
17.
                             KEY WORDS AND DOCUMENT ANALYSIS
                 DESCRIPTORS
                                          b.lDENTIFIERS/OPEN ENDED TERMS
                                                c. COSATI Field/Group
 Air Pollution
 Magnesium Oxides
 Regeneration
  (Engineering)
 Fuel Oil
 Scrubbers
Combustion
  Products
Flue Gases
Desulfurization
Sulfur Dioxide
Sulfuric Acid
Air Pollution Control
Stationary Sources
Magnesia Scrubbing
Particulate
13B
07B
                         2 ID
                         07A
2 IB

07D
18. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT

 Unlimited
                       19. SECURITY CLASS (Tliis Report/
                       Unclassified
                         21. NO. OF PAGES
                             267
                       20. SECURITY CLASS (Thispage)
                       Unclassified
                                                22. PRICE
£PA Form 2220-1 (9-73)
                                          257

-------