EPA/SAB/78/001
REPORT OF THE AD HOC STUDY GROUP ON
PENTACHLOROPHENOL CONTAMINANTS
DECEMBER 29, 1978
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH ADVISORY COMMITTEE
SCIENCE ADVISORY BOARD
U,S, ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
WASHINGTON, D,C, 20460
-------
. EPA/SAB/78/001
REPORT OF THE AD HOC STUDY GROUP ON
PENTACHLOROPHENOL CONTAMINANTS
December 29, 1978
Environmental Health Advisory Committee
Science Advisory Board
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Washington, D.C. 20460
-------
EPA NOTICE
This report has been written as part of the activities
of the Environmental Health Committee of the Science
Advisory Board, a public advisory group providing
extramural scientific information to the Administrator and
other officials of the Environmental Protection Agency. The
Board is structured to provide a balanced expert assessment
of the scientific matters related to problems facing the
Agency. This report has not been reviewed for approval by
the Agency, hence its contents do not necessarily represent
the views and policies of the Environmental Protection
Agency, nor does mention of trade names or commerical
products constitute endorsement or recommendation for use.
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
1.1 Background 1
1. 2 Discussion 2
1.3 Conclusions 6
2. SUMMARY OF CHEMISTRY AND ENVIRONMENTAL
BEHAVIOR OF PENTACHLOROPHENOL AND ITS
CONTAMINANTS
2.1 Pentachlorophenol and its Uses 9
2.2 Manufacture of Pentachlorophenol
and its Contaminants 9
2.3 Properties of Pentachlorophenol
and its Contaminants 11
2.4 Detection and Quantification of
PCP and its Contaminants 11
2. 5 Environmental Chemistry 11
3. TOXICOLOGY
3.1 Toxicity of PCP in Laboratory Animals.. 17
3.2 Toxicology of Chlorinated Dioxins
and Dibenzofurans 30
3.3 Human Poisonings Involving PCP 36
3.4 Human Poisonings Involving Exposure
to Chlorinated Dibenzo-p-dioxins 40
4. MECHANISTIC RELATIONSHIPS IN THE
TOXICITY OF COMPOUNDS STRUCTURALLY
RELATED TO THE CHLORINATED DIBENZO-p-
DIOXINS 43
APPENDICES
5. A - Study Group Members and their
Affiliations 47
6. B - Charge to Study Group 48
7. C - Chemistry of Pentachlorophenol
and its Contaminants 49
8. D - Testimony and Comments of
Interested Parties Concerning
Initial Draft Report at EHAC
Review of April 3, 1978 99
111
-------
List of Tables
2.1 Comparison of Composition of Commercial Grade
and Purified Grade Pentachlorophenol 10
2.2 Chlorodioxin Isomer Distributions in Commer-
cial Grade PCP (Dowicide 7) and PCP-Na
Samples 10
2.3 Physical Properties of Pentachlorophenol 12
2.4 Physical Properties of Various Chlorodioxins .... 13
2.5 Solubility of Several Chlorodioxins in Various
Solvents 14
3.1 Pentachlorophenol-Compositions reported for
Some Samples used in Toxicity Testing 18
3.2 Biological Activity Purified vs. Technical
Samples of PCP 22
3.3 Toxicology Data Summary 32
3.4 Distribution of Human Episodes Resulting from
Exposure to Pentachlorophenol by Medical
Attention and Circumstances 39
7.1 Comparison of Composition of Commercial Grade
and Purified Grade Pentachlorophenol 52
7.2 Chlorodioxins and Chlorofurans in Dow PCP
Products 53
7.3 Hexa- and Octachlorodioxins in Domestic PCPs 53
7.4 GC-MS Analyses of Monsanto PCP 54
7.5 Chlorodioxins in a Commercial PCP and PCP-Na
Sampl e 55
7.6 Hexachlorodioxin Isomers in Three Dow Products... 55
7.7 Chlorodibenzofurans in Dow PCP Products 56
7.8 Reactions in Chlorination of Trichlorophenol 57
7.9 Dioxin Congeners in Commercial PCP 58
IV
-------
List of Tables (Cont.)
7.10 Physical Properties of Pentachlorophenol (PCP)... 60
7.11 Physical Properties of Various Chlorodioxins 62
7.12 Solubility of Several Chlorodioxins in Various
Solvents 63
7.13 Properties of Chlorinated Dibenzofurans 64
7.14 Melting Points of Chlorodiphenyl Ethers 65
7.15 Chlorinated Dibenzofurans, GLC Retention Times
Relative to 2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin... 66
7.16 Chlorinated Dibenzo-p-dioxins, GLC Retention Times
Relative to 2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin... 67
7.17 Estimated Half-Lives of Several Chlorodioxins
in Refluxing KOH Solution 71
7.18 Chlorinated Dibenzodioxins and Dibenzofurans
Isomers and Sources 75
7.19 Dibenzo-p-dioxin (D): Approximate Activity of
Congeners in Chick Embryo Assay for Induction
of Aryl Hydrocarbon Hydroxylate 77
7.20 Dibenzofurans (F): Approximate Activity in Chick
Embryo Assay for Induction of Aryl Hydrocarbon
Hydroxylase 78
7.21 Estimated Vapor Density and Rate of Evaporation
of Chlorodioxins 79
7.22 Estimated Vapor Density and Rate of Evaporation
of Chlorinated Dibenzofurans 79
7.23 Major Registered Uses of PCP 86
7.24 Some Potential Sources of Occupation Exposure to
PCP and PCP Impurities 87
7.25 Some Potential Sources of Incidental Exposure
to PCP and PCP Impurities 87
-------
1. SUMMARY and CONCLUSIONS
1.1 Background
In the fall of 1970, the U.S. Department of Agri-
culture (USDA) expressed concern about the presence of
certain chlorodioxins in some "economic poisons." In
January 1971, the USDA held a meeting with industry
officials to discuss the problems of these chlorodioxins in
pentachlorophenol (PCP). At that time the hexa- and
heptachlorodibenzo-p-dioxins (dioxins) were identified as
the contaminants of major concern in PCP. Since that time
the intensity and breadth of concern about the health
implications of polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins have
increased. This concern has no doubt been stimulated by
the development and widespread publication of knowledge of
the extremely high toxicity of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-
p-dioxin (TCDD). Although TCDD is or has been a contaminant
of great concern in several well publicized cases, it
should be noted that TCDD has not been identified as a
contaminant of pentachlorophenol manufactured in the United
States. Frequent references to TCDD in subsequent
discussions are because it is the only polychlorinated
dibenzo-p-dioxin that has been the object of comprehensive
toxicologic research. Several other polychlorinated
dibenzo-p-dioxins and related polychlorinated dibenzofurans
have now, however, been identified as contaminants of
commercial samples of pentachlorophenol. A commercial
process has been developed and patented which enables
production of pentachlorophenol with greatly reduced
concentrations of these contaminants. This development, as
well as the scheduled reregistration procedures required
under the amended Federal Insecticide, Fungicide,
Rodenticide Act (FIFRA), stimulated the EPA to give
extensive consideration to whether or not the
polychlorinated dibenzodioxins present in PCP have
contributed to increased health hazards or environmental
degradation associated with PCP use.
The EPA requested that the Science Advisory Board
(SAB) consider this issue. The request was referred to the
Environmental Health Advisory Committee of the SAB. On
January 12, 1977, the Chairman of the Environmental Health
Advisory Committee appointed an Ad Hoc Study Group on
Pentachlorophenol Contaminants and charged it to review and
report on available information about the chemistry and
toxicology of the chlorinated dibenzodioxins and
-------
dibenzofurans. Additionally, to the extent possible, the
study group was asked to comment on the potential hazard to
humans which could be attributed to registered uses of PCP
and the extent to which this hazard might be mitigated
by use of a commercial process which results in lower
levels of chlorinated dibenzodioxins and related
contaminants (see Charge to Study Group—Appendix B).
Early in its deliberations the Study Group recognized
that the breadth of the charge, as well as the relative
paucity of information on the chemistry and toxicology of
polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and dibenzofurans/
precluded an early or comprehensive response. By
consensus, the Study Group agreed to respond to the charge
by attempting to identify the areas of information needs
required to evaluate the problem of PCP contamination with
dioxins and related compounds. The Study Group would
supply specific information when possible and would attempt
to identify the information gaps which limit conclusions
regarding both specific regulatory questions concerning PCP
and the broad issues of total environmental contamination
by chemically and toxicologically related halogenated
dioxin-like substances.
1.2 Discussion
Pentachlorophenol is produced and used extensively.
Production in the U.S. is estimated at approximately 50
million pounds per year; the vast majority of which is used
as a wood preservative. However, there are other uses
including use as an herbicide, a fungicide, a bacteriocide,
a slimicide and as a preservative for leather.
Numerous contaminants have been identified and
quantified in samples of pentachlorophenol from several
major commercial producers. The quantity and proportions
of the contaminants differ somewhat from batch-to-batch of
the technical grade product and are discussed in more
detail in Appendix C. The contaminants include
tetrachlorophenol (5-10%), trichlorophenol (1%),
chlorinated phenoxyphenols (about 5%) and polychlorinated
dibenzo-p-dioxins and dibenzofurans ranging in
concentration from thousands of ppm in the case of
octachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin to tens to hundreds of ppm for
the hexa- and heptachlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and for the
octa-, hepta- and hexachlorodibenzofurans.
-------
While it is technically feasible to produce
commercially purified PCP that can meet reasonable
regulatory constraints relative to chlorinated dibenzo-p-
dioxins and dibenzofurans, the production of this more
purified product entails increased production costs and,
according to some industry representatives, results in a
product that may be more difficult to handle. A patented
commercial process exists which enables the production of
PCP which contains much lower concentrations of
contaminants reducing the hepta- and octachlorodibenzo-p-
dioxins to 10 to 20 ppm and most of the other
polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxin and dibenzofuran
concentrations to 1 or 2 ppm. However, the production of
the purified product results in another serious problem of
how to safely handle and dispose of the concentrated
residual waste created in the removal of the contaminants.
The matter of disposal has been a subject of serious
consideration by a previous advisory committee and by
industry representatives. (See Appendix D.) There is no
question that the handling, transport and disposal of any
residual toxic product from the purification process must
proceed under the strictest standards. Possible disposal
methods include a suitable licensed disposal site (none is
known according to Reichhold, Appendix D) and either land
or sea incineration. Presently, the Dow Chemical Company's
Midland, Michigan petrochemical complex uses incineration
to destroy the wastes associated with PCP purification.
(See letter of Robert Johnson to Ernst Linde, Appendix D.)
With regard to the possibility of human exposure to
PCP and/or its contaminants, it is useful to consider
certain physico-chemical properties of PCP relative to its
contaminants. The chlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxin and
dibenzofuran contaminants are less volatile and less water-
soluble than the un-ionized form of PCP and are, therefore,
less readily transported by vaporization and air transfer
or by surface water. Furthermore, the dioxins tend to bind
strongly to soil and wood, which further limits their
transport. On the other hand, the contaminants are
generally more persistent than PCP, as they are only slowly
biodegradable with half-lives in soil on the order of a
year or longer. Although there are considerable data on
the environmental persistence of TCDD, for which
photodecomposition on surfaces and microbial metabolism are
major factors in its environmental degradation, data are
very sparse on the environmental persistence and transport
of the chlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxin and dibenzofuran
contaminants of pentachlorophenol.
-------
A key problem to overcome in order to make an adequate
evaluation of the relative hazard of PCP and its
contaminants is the lack of ready availability of suitably
sensitive and specific analytical methods. Although much
progress has been made in developing appropriate analytical
capability, routine analysis has been hampered by the
unavailability of suitable analytical standards for some of
the isomers. In fact, the availability of appropriately
specific analytical methods may be the rate limiting factor
in assessing the. hazard of dioxins and related chemicals.
Thus, when there are several isomers with widely differing
toxicities, as is the case with hexachlorodibenzo-p-
dioxins, analyses of the isomers as a group only permit
assessment of hazard based upon the most toxic isomer. This
approach may, indeed, lead to overestimates of hazard, but,
in the absence of more definitive analyses of specific
toxic chemical species, it is necessary to treat
contamination data on a toxicologically worst-case basis.
The toxicological information necessary to make the
evaluation of relative hazard of purified versus standard
commercial PCP is also deficient. Pentachlorophenol is a
toxic chemical in its own right. A set of signs and
symptoms characteristic of uncouplers of oxidative
phosphorylation has been described in several cases of
accidental or suicidal poisonings. The chlorinated
dibenzo-p-dioxins and dibenzofurans, on the other hand,
have quite a different syndrome in acute poisoning. This
syndrome is characterized by a delayed onset and involves
widespread degenerative changes in several organs, in
particular the liver, thymus, and skin. There are limited
data on the acute toxicity (LD^Q) of the chlorinated
dibenzo-p-dioxin and dibenzofuran contaminants of PCP, but
there are virtually no data on the chronic toxicity of the
contaminants. Although the acute toxicity of purified PCP
is generally less than that of contaminated technical
samples, there are insufficient data to permit such a
comparison for chronic toxicity. Studies of acute toxicity
of technical PCP suggest that some of the effects, e.g.,
liver damage, are more consistent with a dioxin effect than
with purely a PCP effect. Induction of aryl hydrocarbon
hydroxylase (AHH) activity appears to offer a means of
comparing the relative biological activity of poly-
chlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and dibenzofurans and cor-
relates quite well with acute toxicity measurements. How-
ever, a problem is that this test has not been validated
for assessing relative potential for chronic injury from
the contaminants. Recent reports of the induction of
-------
neoplasms by TCDD (Van Miller et al., 1977; Kociba, 1977)
raises the specter that the polychlorinated dibenzo-p-
dioxin contaminants of PCP may also have this potential.
At least some of these contaminants, e.g.,
octachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin, have been started in the
National Cancer Institute's (NCI) carcinogenesis screening
program, but no data have yet been made available from NCI
on PCP itself. (See section 3.1.4 for discussion of
purified PCP.) A paper dealing with long term studies of
TCDD and HCDD was recently presented at the New York
Academy of Sciences Science Week (Holmes et al., 1978).
A recent incident of illness in a herd of cows housed
in a newly constructed barn in Michigan stimulated an
investigation into possible contamination of tissue by
residues of pentachlorophenol and its dioxin contaminants.
Both PCP and some of the polychlorinated dibenzodioxins
were found in tissues of these cows (Moore, 1977, see
section 3.2.3). This finding of low, but detectable,
levels of chlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins in tissues of these
animals is a matter of public health concern; however, the
biological significance of this finding is not presently
known.
There have been reports of occupational exposure to
chlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins resulting in adverse health
effects in man. Usually chloracne has been the predominant
sign of toxicity, although signs and symptoms of systemic
poisoning (some of which are consistent with dioxin
poisoning in laboratory animals) have also been reported in
association with these industrial exposures. There is
insufficient information concerning the identity and dosage
of dioxins involved to allow these observations in man to
be useful in a quantitative assessment of the relative
hazard of purified PCP versus commercial products
containing dioxin contaminants. There are no data that
permit an estimate of the relative susceptibility of humans
to systemic effects of the dioxins and related contaminants
of PCP. The widespread (though of relatively brief
duration) exposure of humans to TCDD in Seveso, Italy
during an industrial accident in 1976 may yet provide
information that will permit some estimates of human dose-
response relationships to that dioxin. As yet, there is no
quantitative information which permits a comparison of the
toxicity of dioxin to humans versus other animals.
-------
1.3 Conclusions
1. Toxic polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxin and
dibenzofuran isomers are known to be present in commercial,
technical pentachlorophenol (PCP). The most toxic dioxin
known, TCDD, has not, however, been found in PCP.
2. Analytical methods and preparation of standards for
analysis of the various isomers of the hexa-, hepta-, and
pentachlorinated dioxins have been developed. The method-
ology and equipment required, however, have limited their
widespread use.
3. Among the chlorinated dioxins there are marked
differences in acute toxicity of the isomers; therefore
when analysis of a PCP sample is expressed in terms of
total isomers, such as hexachlorodibenzo-p-dioxins,
evaluation of potential hazard must be based upon the
most toxic of the hexachlorinated isomers.
4. The polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxin and
dibenzofuran contaminants are more stable and persistent,
but less mobile, in the environment than PCP.
5. There is evidence that the dibenzo-p-dioxin and
dibenzofuran isomers can migrate from PCP-treated wood into
animal tissues and products that are consumed by man. The
toxicological impact of this exposure cannot be quantified
with present data and information, but, conservatively, any
exposure by this route must be considered undesirable and
attempts should be made to prevent exposure.
6. Numerous cases of acute human poisonings with PCP
have occurred, and some occupational exposures to PCP have
resulted in chloracne and other signs suggestive of
dibenzo-p-dioxin or dibenzofuran poisoning. The data and
information related to these reports are inadequate to
assess the toxic hazard of PCP and its contaminants to man.
7. The most probable opportunity for human exposure
to toxic quantities of PCP and its contaminants is in the
PCP production and utilization industries. Any major
changes in the application of PCP must consider the
implication to this high risk occupational group.
Environmental exposures of humans are likely to be limited
and most probably would occur from direct contact with PCP-
treated wood, from exposures through ingestion of food
contaminated by residues, or from occupational exposure
from inhalation of off-gassing vapors from improperly
treated wood.
-------
8. Certain uses of PCP, e.g., application to wood
used in human or animal housing or to wood that may come in
contact with foods or feeds, increases the probability of
exposure to man. Restrictions on such uses might be a
first step in reducing the likelihood of injury from PCP
and its contaminants.
9. There are insufficient quantitative data to rank
the relative contribution of PCP to the overall
environmental contamination with dibenzo-p-dioxins and
dibenzofurans. However, because of PCP's extensive use, it
may be a major source of chlorinated dioxins in the
environment. As regards the dibenzofurans, PCP probably
represents a lesser source. However, the similar
toxicological effects produced by the polychlorinated
dibenzo-p-dioxins, dibenzofurans, and other related
compounds (chloroazobenzenes, chloroazoxybenzenes,
chlorinated napthalenes, and polyhalogenated biphenyls)
suggest the potential for additive hazard from the many
sources of these contaminants. Quantitative data on the
total environmental contaminants, the fractional
contribution of the major sources of these contaminants,
and the toxicological response to mixtures of contaminants
are urgently needed.
10. Technology is now available which could markedly
reduce the levels of dibenzo-p-dioxin and dibenzofuran
contaminants in PCP. It would seem prudent, therefore, to
control the contaminants to the extent possible by best
manufacturing practice. This might best be accomplished by
a phasing in of improved processing. This phasing in of
the use of the more purified product must take into account
the economic impacts as well as the possible trade-offs of
occupational hazards related to residue handling, transport
and disposal.
Addendum; Coincident with the final review of this
report, an" article appeared in Science (Vol. 202, p.
1166-1167, December 15, 1978) suggesting that "Dioxins"
were produced in trace quantities during the combustion of
a wide variety of materials and could be expected to have
ubiquitous distribution in the environment. A preliminary
review of some data that formed the basis of this report
indicated that the quantities produced in most combustion
activities would contribute extremely minute quantities or
no dioxins to the environment. However, combustion of
highly chlorinated materials in improperly fueled
incinerators resulted in sufficient quantities of
chlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins to warrant attention and
further investigation as to a possible source of
environmental contamination.
-------
1.4 References
Holmes, P.A., J.H. Rust, W.R. Richter, and A.M. Shefner
(1978). Long term effects of TCDD and HCDD in mice
and rats. In: Abstracts of N.Y. Academy of Sciences,
Science Week (June 21-30, 1978) on The Scientific
Basis for the Public Control of Environmental Health
Hazards.
Kociba, R.J., Dow Chemical (1977). Letter and attachments
to Thomas Holloway, EPA. September 7, 1977.
Moore, J.A. (1977). Memorandum to Director, NIEHS (March
21, 1977). Subject: Studies on Possible
Pentachlorophenol/Dibenzodioxin Intoxication Progress
Report #2.
Van Miller, J.P., J.J. Lalich, and J.R. Allen (1977).
Increased incidence of neoplasms in rats exposed to
low levels of 2,3,7,8- TCDD. Chemosphere 6^ (9) :
537-544.
-------
2. SUMMARY of CHEMISTRY and ENVIRONMENTAL BEHAVIOR
of PENTACHLOROPHENOL and ITS CONTAMINANTS
2.1 Pentachlorophenol and its Uses
Pentachlorophenol (PCP) is a compound of high and
diversified biological activity. It has been shown to be
an effective contact poison against bacteria, fungi and
higher plants and is also toxic to animals. PCP has been
registered for a wide variety of uses, including as a wood
preservative, an herbicide, a slimicide, a preservative for
hardboard and paper, a leather preservative, an additive
in paints, and a treatment in greenhouses. The principal
use of PCP, however, is in wood treatment as either the
free phenol dissolved in a petroleum carrier or as the
sodium salt in a water based dip treatment. PCP has been
used for over 40 years in wood treatment. The current
level of production and use in the United States is
probably in excess of 50 million pounds per year. The
manufacturing capacity is estimated to be approximately 70
million pounds per year.
2.2 Manufacture of PCP and its Contaminants
PCP in the United States is manufactured from phenol
by a catalytic chlorination process. During chlorination,
the temperature must be maintained above the melting point
of the products formed; this, it is felt, contributes to
the side reaction that gives rise to contaminants.
Commercial technical PCP contains other chlorinated
phenols, among them the 2,3,4,6-tetra isomer, traces of
trichlorophenol, chlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins, chlorinated
dibenzofurans, chlorophenoxy phenols, chlorodiphenyl
ethers, chlorohydroxydiphenyl ethers, and traces of even
more complex reaction products of phenol. Most
chlorobenzodioxins are the by-products about which there
are the greatest concerns. Analyses of PCP have revealed
that the principal chlorodioxin and chlorodibenzofuran
contaminants are those containing six to eight chlorines.
The highly toxic 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD)
has not been identified in any sample of PCP that has been
analyzed. The compositions of a sample of commercial PCP
and of a sample of purified PCP are given in Table 2.1. A
representative distribution of isomers is given in Table
2.2.
-------
TABLE 2.1
Comparison of composition of commercial grade
and purified grade Pentachlorophenol (PCP)
Analytical Results
Component Commercial3 Purified
(Dowicide 7) (Dowicide EC-7)
Pentachlorophenol
Tetrachlorophenol
Trichlorophenol
Chlorinated phenoxyphenols
88.4%
4.4%
0.1%
6.2%
Octachlorodioxins 2500 ppm
Heptachlorodioxins
Hexachlorodioxins
Octachlorodibenzof urans
Heptachlorodibenzof urans
He xachlorodibenzof urans
^Sample 9522 A
Technical grade PCP reduced
125 ppm
4 ppm
80 ppm
80 ppm
30 ppm
by distillation
89.8%
10.1%
0.1%
— __
15.0 ppm
6 . 5 ppm
1.0 ppm
1.0 ppm
1.8 ppm
1.0 ppm
TABLE 2.2
Chlorodioxin isomer distributions in commercial
grade PCP (Dowicide 7) and PCP-Na samples.
(Buser, 1975;1976)
ppm chlorodioxin in
Chlorodioxin PCP PCP-Na
1,2,3,6,7,9-ClgD 1 0.5
1,2,3,6,8,9-ClgD 3 1.6
1,2,3,6,7,8-ClgD 5 1.2
1,2,3,7,8,9-CLgD 0 0.1
1,2,3,4,6,7,9-C17D 63 16.0
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-C17D 171 22.0
l,2,3,4,6,7,8,9-ClgD 250 110.0
10
-------
2.3 Properties of PCP and its Contaminants
The physical properties of a compound play an
important role in how the compound behaves under different
conditions. These properties influence the mobility of a
compound in air or water, its ability to adsorb to
surfaces, and its disappearance due to some type of
degradation. This behavior relates to the route and rate
of exposure by which a compound might be received by man or
other organisms. For these reasons the properties of PCP
and its principal contaminants, dioxins and dibenzofurans,
so far as possible, were evaluated in this report. (See
Tables 2.3-2.5.) From these tables of physical properties
it is ascertained that PCP has a higher vapor pressure, a
higher water solubility, and a lower capacity for
adsorption than the dioxins or dibenzofurans. For these
reasons PCP is likely to be far more mobile than the
dioxins or the dibenzofurans. The dioxins and
dibenzofurans would probably show an enhanced propensity
for adsorption and hence a low availability.
2.4 Detection and Quantification of PCP and its
Contaminants
There are a number of methods that may be used for
analyzing PCP; these include colorimetry, spectro-
photometry, and gas chromatography (GC). Gas
chromatography is probably the most sensitive and widely
used method. It is routinely applied for detection and
quantification of PCP down to the parts per billion range.
Analytical methods employing gas chromatography and mass
spectrometry have been devised for the chlorodibenzodioxins
and chlorodibenzofurans. The current state of the art for
TCDD provides a reliable analysis down to the low parts per
trillion range. Gas chromatography alone is adequate only
for the higher concentrations.
2.5 Environmental Chemistry
PCP has been found in a number of different
environmental samples such as house dust, air, water and
urine of presumably non-exposed humans. Frequently the
appearance of PCP in non-biological samples can be
explained by the proximity of a source of PCP, but in the
case of the urine of presumably non-exposed humans the
explanation is more elusive. It may be that
exposure to treated wood or the use of PCP as a
preservative in certain items affords human exposure, but
another possibility that cannot be ruled out is the
generation of pentachlorophenol in chlorination of water or
perhaps even the generation of PCP by natural processes.
11
-------
TABLE 2.3
Physical Properties of Pentachlorophenol (PCP)
Molecular Weight
Melting Point
Boiling Point
Density
Vapor Pressure
Solubility H20
Solubility of sodium salt,
Partition Coefficient
Molar Refraction
266.35
191°C
3lO°C (decomposes)
1.987
1.6 X I0~4mm Hg (25°)
1.2 X 10~1mm Hg (100°C)
40 mm Hg (211°C)
20 ppm at 30°C
33g/100g
1 X 105'01
53.5
12
-------
TABLE 2.4
Physical Properties of Various Chlorodioxins
Estimated
Chlorodioxin
2,
2,
2,
1,
1,
1,
, 1,
1,
1,
, i'
I *'
\
i,
7,-Cl2
3,7-Cl3
3,7,8,-Cl4
2,4,7,8-015
2,3,7,8-Cl5
2,4,6,7,9-Cig
2,3,6,8,9-Clc
D
2,3,6,7,8-Cl6
2,3,7,3,9-Cl6
2,3,4,6,?,9-Cl7
2,3,4,6,7,8-017
2,3,4,6,7,8,9-Clg
Mol.
253.
287.
321.
356.
356.
390.
390.
390.
390.
425.
425.
459.
Wt.
08
53
87
42
42
86
86
86
86
31
31
75
M.P.
C
__
162
306
206
241
240
--
. 285
243
__
__
331
"P
II
Value va/
0.
0.
0.
-
-
0.
-
-
0.
0.
0.
76
86
51
-
- •
94(di
-
-
9C
90
90
Vapor
(b)
Pressure
6.0 x
3.6 x
1.7 x
—
—
6.6 x
—
—
—
3.0 x
m»m»
1.8 x
ID'6
ID'6
10"6
ID'7
ID'7
ID'7
Molar
Refraction
-_
«• ••
71.
72.
'
81.
85.
90.
4
6
1
9
7
UV Max
(CHCI) nm
302
305
310
307
303
310
--
316
317
—
—
318
(a) Beroza, M. and M.C. Bowman, "p" value determined for dioxin between hexane and acetonitrile,
J. Assoc. Of fie. Anal. Chem. 4_8:358-370 (1965).
(b) Vapor pressure estimated from data of Woolson (Woolson e_t al. f 1973).
'• (c) Estimated by summing atomic refractions.
: (d) "p" value determined for mixture of hexachlorodioxin isomers.
-------
TABLE 2.5
Solubility of Several Chlorodioxins in Various Solvents3
Solubility in rag per liter
Solvent
acetone
anisole
benzene
chloroform
methanol
toluene
o-xylene
water 0.0002
— indicates no data
(a) Firestone observed that 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD is considerably
less soluble in organic solvents than other HxCDD isomers
The solubility of the 1,2,3,6,7,8-isomer in isooctane is
about 20 mg/1.
^b) Dow standard 82-A, a mixture of 71% 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD and
29% 1,2,3,6,7,9-HxCDD and 1,2,3,6,8,9-HxCDD.
TCDD
90
—
470
550
10
—
__
HxCDD(b)
—
2600
1600
—
—
1800
— _
OCDD
5
1700
1000
560
—
1500
3600
14
-------
Additionally, exposure to hexachlorobenzene (HCB) results
in excretion of significant amounts of PCP in urine. Uptake
of PCP by living organisms occurs quite readily, whether by
oral, respiratory, or dermal routes. The material is
excreted in urine either as free phenol or as conjugated
metabolites. The length of time for loss of the ingested
amount varies with the species and ranges up to 90 hours.
The distribution of the dibenzo-p-dioxins and
dibenzofurans in the environment has been less widely
studied. For the most part, in the studies that have been
conducted exposure was likely to have occurred through use
of materials containing these contaminants. Upon direct
exposure, both the chlorinated dibenzodioxins (CDDs) and
the chlorinated dibenzofurans (CDFs) are taken up and
retained in the bodies of experimental animals. CDDs and
CDFs do accumulate in tissues, but not as readily as some
other chlorinated organic compounds such as dieldrin, DDT
and polychlorinated biphenyls. This would be expected on
the basis of the partition coefficients found for one or
two members of the series. TCDD, the most toxic of the
chlorinated dioxins, has been shown to have a half-life in
rats of about 21 days. Analyses of samples of marine
organisms for presence of TCDD were negative, but this may
have been due to the limitation of the method's sensitivity
(parts per billion range).
PCP as a free phenol has been found to adsorb readily
on many surfaces, especially on soil. The adsorption is
greatest when the molecule is un-ionized and least when it
is in the form of a sodium salt or at a higher pH value.
It has been found, at least in water, that even the sodium
salt is readily adsorbed by suspended particulate matter
and carried to the bottom of the water course.
Pentachlorophenol is susceptible to photochemical
degradation, particularly in the presence of other
substances. PCP photodegrades in water and various
solvents to yield a variety of products.
The CDDs and CDFs are relatively less mobile than PCP.
Their vapor pressures are substantially lower and their
propensity for adsorption greater. Degradation of CDDs and
CDFs in the environment, particularly in soil, is
substantially slower than for PCP. Whereas PCP degrades in
30-50 days in moist soil, the half-life of TCDD was found
to be approximately one year. Photodegradation of TCDD,
15
-------
on the other hand, was found to be very rapid in the
presence of hydrogen donors such as oils and 2,4,5-T.
The principal dioxin contaminant of technical
pentachlorophenol is the octachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin, or
OCDD. There is concern that this compound and the other
chlorodioxins might be generated in burning treated paper
or wood. Studies of R.H. Stehl and L.L. Lamparski (1977)
and B. Ahling and L. Johansson (1977) indicate that low
levels of the chlorodioxins might thus be generated under
certain conditions of combustion. The levels are
sufficiently low, however, as probably not to be a serious
source of exposure.
Further discussion and documentation of the chemistry
for PCP and its contaminants may be found in Appendix C,
Section 7.
2.6 References
Ahling, B. and L. Johansson (1977). Combustion experiments
using pentachlorophenol on a pilot scale and
full-scale. Chemosphere 6 (7): 425.
Stehl, R.H. and L.L. Lamparski (1977). Combustion of
several 2,4,5-trichlorophenoxy compounds: formation
of 2,3,7,8-tetrachloro-dibenzo-p-dioxin. Science 197;
1008.
16
-------
3 . TOXICOLOGY
3.1 Toxicity of Pentachlorophenol in Laboratory Animals
The widespread use of pentachlorophenol (PCP) as an
antimicrobial agent and the likelihood of commercial
products being contaminated with certain highly toxic
polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and dibenzofurans
necessitate a review of the toxicological information
currently available. Although this review is primarily
concerned with data on PCP per se , available data on
commercial samples are included for comparative purposes.
Results of acute toxicity studies by oral, dermal,
and injection routes, repeated oral exposures of 3-8
months, a two-year oral test with PCP containing very low
levels of contaminants, mutagenic and teratogenic studies,
and a recent study on the effects of PCP on metabolizing
enzymes are reviewed.
3.1.1 Sample Studies
Table 3.1 lists the composition of the samples used
in the long term studies. The PCP content varies from 85%
to 99%. There is no evidence of the presence of 2,3,7,8-
tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) , the most toxic of the
polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins. The 1,2,3,6,7,8-
hexachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (HxCDD) is the major hexa isomer
(Buser, 1975;1976). The 1, 2, 3 , 7 , 8 ,9-isomer has been
reported to produce chick edema. (Cantrell et al. , 1969).
The octachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (OCDD) has shown little
toxicity, possibly because of its low solubility. The
objective in recent years has been to reduce the levels of
polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and polychlorinated
dibenzofurans to a minimum in the commercial samples.
3.1.2 Acute Toxicity
Oral; The LD^Q for PCP in male rats has been
reported as 78 mgAg (Deichmann et al. , 1942) , 90 mgAg
(Gabrilevskaya and Laskina, 1964), 146 mg/kg (Gaines, 1969)
and 205 mg Ag t the last being Dowicide EC-7 (relatively
pure). For the female rat, it was 135 mg/kg (Dow Chemical
Co. Summary, 1969) and 175 ing/kg (EC-7) (Gaines, 1969).
The LDcg for mice was reported as 130 jf 9.5 mg/kg
(Pleskova and Bencze, 1959); 100-130 mgAg for rabbits
(Deichmann et al. , 1942); for guinea pigs, 250 mgAg
(Gabrilovskaya and Laskina, 1964); and for swine 120 mgAg
17
-------
TABLE 3.1
PENTACIILOROPHENOL - COMPOSITIONS REPORTED FOR SOME SAMPLES USED IN TOXICITY TESTING*
PURIFIED - COMMERCIAL
Pentachlorophehol
Tetrachlorophenol
Trichlorophenol
Higher Chlorophenols
Caustic Insolubles (max)
2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-
dioxins
Pentachlorodibenzo-p-dioxins
Hexachlorodibenzo-p-dioxins
Heptachlorodibenzo-p-dioxins
Octachlorodiberizo-p-dioxin
Tetrachlorodibenzofurans
Pentachlorodibenzofurans
Hexachlorodibenzofurans
Ileptachlorodibenzofurans
Octachlorodibenzofuran
*ppmunless otherwise stated
(1) Analyses by GC-MS - Sensitivity 0.1 ppm
(2) Analyses by GC-MS - Sensitivity 0.05 ppm
(3) J. A. Goldstein et al. (1977)
(4) B. A. Schewtz et al. (1976)
(5) Buser (1975) reported 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD as major isomer (toxic),
(6) R. L. Johnson et al. (1973)
Aldrich
(1) (3)
> 99%
< 0.1
< 0.1
< 0.1
< 0.1
* 0.1
S 0.1
< 0.1
< 0.1
< 0.1
< o.i
< 0.1
Dowicide EC-7
(2) (4)
90.4 ± 1.0%
10.4 + 0.2
< 0.1
< 0.05
1.0 + 0.1
6.5 + 1.0
15.0 + 3.0
3.4 + 0.4
1.8 + 0.3
< 1
Dowicide 7
(6)
85-90%
4-8 %
< 0.1
2-6%
1
None
9.27
575-2510
Detected
Detected
Detected
Monsanto
(1) (3)
84.6%
3 %
< 0.1
< 0.1
8 (5)
520
1380
< 4 •
40
90
400
260
-------
(Harrison, 1959). Dreisbach (1963) has reported an estimated
dose for man to be as low as 29 mg/kg.
These data would suggest that PCP has moderate acute
oral toxicity, but that the LDcQ value may vary with the
quality and quantity of contaminants. Man would appear to
be more susceptible than the rodent and the female to be
more susceptible than the male.
Skin Absorption; When PCP in an organic solvent was
applied to rabbi.t skin under occlusion for 24 hours, 200
mg/kg was lethal, but 100 mg/kg and 50 mg/kg were not (Dow,
1969). The LD50 for rats has been reported as 96 mg/kg,
105 mg/kg, and 320 mg/kg (Demidenko, 1966; Noakes and
Sanderson, 1969; Gaines, 1969) and that for mice as 261 + 39
mg/kg (Pleskova and Bencze, 1959) .
Subcutaneous Injection; The LDcg for the rat was
100 mg/kg, for the rabbit 70 mgAg (5% in olive oil)
(Deichmann et al., 1942), for mice 63 +_ 3.2 mg/kg (Pleskova
and Bencze, 1959).
Intravenous Injection; The lowest dose of PCP
reported to kill rabbits was 22 mg/kg (Kehoe et al., 1939),
when it was instilled as a 1% aqueous sodium pentachloro-
phenate.
Inhalation; Exposure to 5 mg/1 dust, for one hour did
not kill male and female rats (Reichhold Chemicals, 1974).
Demidenko (1969) reported the LD5Q by inhalation to be 225
mg/kg for rats and 355 mg/kg for mice. The exposure
concentration and the calculations to arrive at the LDcg
dose were not given in the abstract. Workers have reported
that the dust is irritating to the mucous membrane of the
nose and throat.
Irritancy Tests; Rabbit eyes exposed to solid material
showed slight conjunctival and slight iritic congestion in
one of four eyes. Exposure of rabbit skin under occlusion
caused minimal irritation on intact skin and slightly more
on abraded skin (Dow, 1969).
Commercial samples have produced chloracne in the
rabbit ear bioassay, whereas the purified material has not.
Positive reactions could be produced by topical or oral
application (Johnson et al. , 1973) .
Allergic contact dermatitis has not been a problem in
handling the chemical.
19
-------
Clinical Effects; Acute animal exposures have, in
general, caused anorexia, diarrhea, stimulation of the
central nervous system, increase in body temperature,
anuria, paralysis of the hind legs and functional
cardiovascular changes leading to death (Deichmann et al.,
1942; Gabrilevskaya and Laskina, 1964; Pleskova and Bencze,
1959; Demidenko, 1966).
3.1.3 Subchronic Feeding Studies
Johnson et. al. (1973) compared the toxicity of
commercial PCP with improved process PCP and with a purified
PCP. (The commercial sample contained 85-90% PCP, 9-26 ppm
of HxCDD and 575-2150 ppm OCDD and produced chlorance of
rabbit ears and chick edema in bioassays. The improved
process PCP contained 88-93% PCP, 30 ppm OCDD and 1.0 ppm
HxCDD. Neither the improved process PCP nor the chemically
pure PCP produced chloracne or chick edema.) Three, 10 and 30
mg/kg per day (mixed with diet) were fed to Sprague-Dawley,
Spartan strain rats for 90 days. The purified and the
improved process PCP caused increase in liver weight at 30
mg/kg and 10 mg/kg and increased kidney weight at 30 mg/kg.
The commercial sample caused a decrease in hematological
values, an increase in alkaline phosphatase, a decrease in
serum albumin, and an increase in liver weights at all
levels; and focal hepatocellular degeneration and necrosis at
the 30 mg/kg level. The authors concluded that the
impurities causing toxic effects had been eliminated by the
new process.
Knudson et al. (1974) fed PCP (Dynamit-Nobel)
containing 200 ppm OCDD, 82 ppm pre-OCDD and no detectable
TCDD to rats (SPF-Wistar) at levels of 0, 25, 50 and 200 ppm
in the diet. Liver weight was increased in rats fed 50 and
200 ppm PCP and was accompanied by increased activity of
microsomal liver enzymes. There were fewer calcium deposits
in the kidneys of test rats. Twenty-five ppm was considered
the no-effect level.
Kimbrough and Hinder (1975) fed purified PCP to one
group of ten male rats and commercial PCP to a second group
for 90 days. A level of 1000 ppm in the diet, equivalent to
approximately 50 mg/kg per day, was chosen for the purpose of
examining liver changes by light and electron microscopy.
Enlargement of hepatocytes was observed in the livers of rats
fed pure PCP, whereas technical grade PCP caused foamy
20
-------
cytoplasm, vacuoles, inclusions, single hepatocellular
necrosis, slight interstitial fibrosis, and prominent brown
pigment in macrophages and Kupffer cells. By electron
microscopy, there was an increase in the smooth endoplasmic
reticulum in the group fed technical PCP with less change
in the rats fed pure PCP. There were many lipid vacuoles
in the former group and some in the latter. Atypical
mitochondria were observed in the livers of both groups.
Goldstein (1977) subsequently studied the differences
between the hepatic effects produced by commercial and
purified PCP with respect to drug metabolizing enzymes and
presence of porphyria. Chemical analyses of the samples
used are listed in Table 3.1. The technical grade material
contained significant amounts of PCDD's and PCDF's, whereas
the purified material contained less than 0.1 ppm of each
isomer, the level of sensitivity of the method. Groups of
six Sherman female weanling rats were fed pure or technical
PCP at levels of 0, 20, 100 or 500 ppm mixed with Purina
Chow. Animals were sacrificed after eight months and
hepatic enzyme activity and hepatic porphyrins were
determined.
Technical pentachlorophenol produced hepatic porphyria
and increased hepatic aryl hydrocarbon hydroxylase
activity, glucuronyl transferase activity, liver weight,
cytochrome p-450, and microsomal heme, but not N-
demethylase activity. The peak of the CO-difference
spectrum of cytochrome p-450 was shifted to 448 nm, and
there was a dramatic increase in the 455/430 ratios of the
ethyl isocyanide difference spectrum. The enzyme changes
were observed at 20 ppm of technical pentachlorophenol.
Porphyria occurred at 100 and 500 ppm. Pure
pentachlorophenol had no significant effect on aryl
hydrocarbon hydroxylase activity, liver weight, cytochrome
p-450, microsomal heme, the ethyl isocyanide difference
spectrum, or N-demethylase activity at any dose level, but
did increase glucuronyl transferase at 500 ppm. In
contrast, both pure and technical pentachlorophenol
decreased body weight gain comparably at 500 ppm. It was
concluded that technical pentachlorophenol produces a
number of liver changes which cannot be attributed to
pentachlorophenol itself, but which are consistent with the
effects of biologically active chlorinated dibenzo-p-
dioxins and dibenzofurans. See Table 3.2.
21
-------
TABLE 3.2
BIOLOGICAL ACTIVITY
PURIFIED VS TECHNICAL SAMPLES OF PCP
Technical
Pure Grade
Chick edema
Chloracne
Porphyria
Increase in liver weight/body wt.
Increase in liver enzyme activity +
Presence of pigment in liver cells +,-
Liver histopathology less
Depressed body weight +
Embryotoxicity +
- indicates no presence
+ indicates presence
22
-------
3.1.4 Two-year Feeding Study
Schwetz et al. (1976) carried out a two-year oral
study with Dowicide EC-7, a substance which the Johnson 90-
day study had shown to act more like purified material than
commercial preparations. Analyses of the samples used are
given in Table 3.1.
Weanling Sprague-Dawley (Spartan-substrain) rats were
divided into five groups of 25 males and 25 females each.
They were fed a test diet of ground Purina Laboratory Chow
mixed with PCP (dissolved in anisole), the amount being
adjusted on a monthly basis to provide dose levels of 0, 1,
3, 10 or 30 mg/kg per day. The male rats were terminated
after 22 months because of high mortality in both control
and test groups. The female groups were terminated after
24 months. Gross and histopathological examinations were
performed.
Effects, which the authors attributed to ingestion of
PCP at the highest dose level of 30 mg/kg per day, were
(1) a significant decrease in body weight among female
rats; (2) a significant increase in serum glutamic pyruvic
transaminase activity in male and female rats; (3) an
increase in the specific gravity of urine among female rats
at the end of one year but not at two years; (4) an
accumulation of pigment in the liver and kidneys. An
accumulation of pigment in the liver and kidneys was also
observed in females fed 10 mg/kg per day. There were no
other significant differences between test and control
groups with respect to clinical observations, hematological
changes, blood and urine chemistry, terminal organ weights
and pathological changes. There was no evidence of
carcinogenic effect, tumors being similar in number and
kind in both test and control groups, nor was there a life-
shortening effect attributable to the test material.
It was concluded, therefore, that doses of penta-
chlorophenol as high as 30 mg/kg per day fed throughout the
life span produced only mild changes which did not shorten
the life span or alter the incidence of tumors.
The results are consistent with those found by
Goldstein (1977) when doses of approximately 25 mg/kg per
day of purified material fed for eight months caused weight
loss. However, dark pigment in the liver reported by
Schwetz et al. (1976) was observed by Kimbrough (1972)
23
-------
in the livers of rats fed technical materials, but not in
those fed purified PCP at doses of 50 mg/kg. An 18-month
feeding study with mice at 130 ppm did not elevate the
incidence of tumors (Innes, 1969).
3.1.5 Chronic Inhalation Exposures
A Russian study has reported that chronic exposure to
3 mg/M caused threshold changes in an unidentified
organism, but no details are given in the abstract. Based
on this study and on observations in the workplace, maximum
allowable concentrations were determined to be 0.1 mg/M
(Demidenko, 1969).
The American Conference of Governmental Industrial
Hygienists (ACGIH) has established a threshold limit value
(TLV) of 0.5 mg/M3 (0.046 ppm), a level below which
irritation to the nose, throat and eyes is minimal (ACGIH,
1971).
3.1.6 Mutagenic-Cytotoxic Potential
PCP has not shown mutagenic activity in the Ames test
(Anderson et al., 1972), the host-mediated assay
(Buselmaier et al., 1973), or the sex-linked lethal test on
drosophila (Vogel and Chandler, 1974) .
3.1.7 Teratogenic and Embryotoxic Potential
PCP did not cause deformities, but it was highly
embryolethal and embryotoxic following oral administration
to rats of 15,30, or 50 mg/kg per day on days 6-15 of
gestation. No effects were produced at 5 mg/kg (Schwetz
and Gehring, 1973; Schwetz et al., 1974) . Purified PCP,
with its low nonphenolic content, was slightly more toxic
than the commercial grade (Schwetz et al., 1974) .
Oral administration of PCP to the golden Syrian
hamster at levels ranging from 1.25 to 20 mg/kg daily from
days 5 to 10 of gestation resulted in fetal deaths and/or
resorptions in three of six test groups. PCP was found in
the blood and fat of the fetuses (Hinkle, 1973).
Pregnant rats (Charles River-CD Strain) were given
60 mg/kg of labeled PCP on days 8 through 13 of gestation and
were sacrificed on the 20th day. Only a small amount of PCP
crossed the placental barrier and only slight teratogenic
effects were noted (Larsen et al., 1975).
24
-------
3.1.8 Summary
Laboratory studies to evaluate the toxicity of PCP as
a wood preservative or pesticide began in the 1930 's and
have continued to the present time. PCP is considered a
toxic compound, an economic poison, whose toxicity may vary
depending upon the quality and quantity of contaminants
which vary with different manufacturing procedures.
Samples were not adequately characterized until recently
when some insoluble contaminants were recognized to be the
highly toxic polychlorinated dibenzodioxins and furans. Due
to the difficulty of separating the isomers and in
obtaining standards for analyses, there are many gaps in
the toxicity data, creating uncertainty in any evaluation
of the potential hazard.
An attempt must be made to differentiate between the
clinical and pathological effects of PCP, the related
phenols, and its likely contaminants, reported as (1) hexa-,
hepta- and octachlorodibenzodioxins and (2) hexa-, hepta- and
octachlorodibenzofurans . In addition there may be
chlorophenoxyphenols and chlorinated diphenyl ethers
(reported in European samples) whose identification,, amounts,
and toxicity have not been evaluated.
The increasing oral LD^Q values through the years
are probably related to improved process procedures,
being reported in 1942 as 78 mg/kg and in 1969 as 205 mg/kg
for male rats. PCP is easily absorbed through the skin,
the LD5Q for rabbits being similar to that by oral
dosing when the material was applied in a lipid solvent
under occlusion.
In general, acute exposure of animals has led to rapid
development of high body temperature, increased respiratory
rate, moderately elevated blood pressure, hyperglycemia,
and muscle weakness, terminating in asphyxial convulsions
with cardiac arrest, which tends to occur in less than 24
hours. Pathological examinations showed extensive damage
to the cardiovascular system. These changes resemble those
produced by the related phenolic compound dinitro-
orthocresol (DNOC). Barnes (1957) concluded that both DNOC
and PCP interfere with production of high energy phosphate
compounds essential to cell respiration. This interference
causes stimulation of the cell metabolism to the toxic
stage with accompanying fever and the other clinical signs
described above.
25
-------
Most chlorinated dibenzodioxins, on the other hand,
show a very different clinical picture. Oxidative
phosphorylation is not affected. The effects are usually
delayed (several weeks to months) and may be accompanied by
effects on the liver, the hemopoietic system, and the
lymphatic system with thymic atrophy and lymphoid
depletion. There is a marked increase in liver microsomal
enzyme activity and eventual histological change. There is
a striking difference in susceptibility among species, the
guinea pig being the most susceptible and the female being
more susceptible than the male.
Comparative chronic studies with purified and
commercial PCP have been limited. In essence, however,
studies show a marked difference in effect on the liver.
The no-effect level for the relatively pure material in a
90 day test was 3-10 mg/kg; the no-effect level for
commercial material was not established. A life time oral
study was done only with new process material at dose
levels of 3, 10 and 30 mg/kg. The data showed that at
higher levels there were some functional changes which did
not result in a shortening of the life span, higher
incidence of tumors or significant pathology.
3.1.9 Conclusions
1. Experience has shown that dermal absorption is the
primary hazard to man from the use of PCP as a wood
preservative.
2. The chemical has a low vapor pressure and is a
respiratory irritant which has acted as a warning. No
complaints have been noted when the concentration does not
exceed the TLV.
3. In the United States there have been no reports of
chronic injury to those workers exposed for as long as 35
years while manufacturing this material. This conclusion
is supported by Western Electric (Ochrymowych, 1978), whose
utility poles were treated with commercial grade PCP, with
no reports of injury in over two decades of service. Deaths
and injuries have arisen from mishandling of the material
in the wood treatment process. There has been a complaint,
however, when treated wood was used in a home interior
without further finishing, a procedure which is not
recommended.
4. Trace contaminants in the form of chlorinated
dioxins and chlorinated dibenzofurans are present in bio-
logically active amounts. Due to limited knowledge of the
amounts and toxicity of the isomers present, only tentative
conclusions as to their contribution to the total toxicity
picture and the extent of the hazard to the general public
can be made.
26
-------
3.1.10 References
ACGIH (1971). Documentation of TLV's for Substances in
Workroom Air. Third edition.
Amer, S. M. and E.M. Ali (1969). Cytological effects of
pesticides. IV. Mitotic effects of some phenols.
Cytologia _3_4(4): 533-40 (CA 73;24223h).
Anderson, K. J., E.G. Leighty, and M.T.Takahashi
(1972). Evaluation of herbicides for possible mutagenic
properties. >J. Agr. Food Chem. 20; 649-56.
Buselmaier, W. , G. Roehrborn, and P. Propping (1973).
Comparative investigations on the mutagenicity of
pesticides in mammalian test systems. Mutat. Research
J21(l): 25-6.
Buser, H-R (1975). Polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins,
separation and identification of isomers by gas
chromatography - mass spectrometry. J. Chromatog. 114;
95-108.
Buser, H.-R (1976). High resolution gas chromatography of
polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and dibenzofurans. Anal
Chem. _48:1553.
Cantrell, J. S., N.C. Webb, and A.J. Mabis (1969). The
identification and crystal structure of a hydro-
pericardium-producing factor: 1, 2, 3, 7, 8, 9-
hexachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin. Acta Cryst. B25: 150-156.
Deichmann, W. B., W. Machle, K.V. Kitzmiller, and
G. Thomas (1942). Acute and chronic effects of
pentachlorophenol and sodium pentachlorophenate upon
experimental animals. J. Pharm. Exptl. Therap. 76; 104.
Demidenko, N. M. (1966). Toxicological properties of
pentachlorophenol. Gig. Toksikol. Pestits. Klin.
Otravleni, (4): 234-9.
Demidenko, N. M. , (1969). Maximum permissible atmospheric
concentration of pentachlorophenol. Gig. Tr. Prof, ^abol,
_T3 (9): 58-60. ( CA 7 2 :47095M) .
Dow Chemical Co. (1969) Toxicity Summary for Dowicide 7.
27
-------
Dreisbach, R. H. (1963). Handbook of Poisoning; Diagnosis
and Treatment, p. 256.
Fed. Proc. (1943). Fed. Am. Soc. Exp. Biol. 2^:76.
Gabrilevskaya, L. N. and V.P. Laskina (1964). Maximum
permissible concentrations of PCP and Na-pentachloro-
phenolate in water reservoirs. Sanit.Okhrana Vodoemov ot
Zagryazneniya Prom.Stochnymi Vodami,(6):251-272
(CA 62;15304d).
Gaines, T. H. (1969). Acute toxicity of pesticides.
Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. .L4(3): 515-34.
Goldstein, J. A. (1977). Effects of pentachlorophenol on
hepatic drug metabolizing enzymes and porphyria related to
contamination with chlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and
dibenzofurans. (In press).
Grant, W. F. (1973). Cytological effects of environmental
mutagens - pesticides. Mutat. Res. _21(4): 221-2.
Harrison, D. L. (1959). The toxicity of wood preservatives
to stock, Part I: Pentachlorophenol. New Zealand Vet. J^.
!_-. 89-98 (CA 55:23814e).
Hinkle,, D. K. (1973). Fetotoxic effects of pentachloro-
phenol in the golden Syrian Hamster. Tox. and
Appl. Pharmacol. 25^(3): 455 (abstract).
innes, J. R. M. et al. (1969). Bioassay of pesticides and
industrial chemicals for tumorigenicity in mice: A
preliminary note. J. Natl. Cane. Inst. 42; 1101-14.
Johnson, R. L., P.J. Gehring, R.J. Kociba, and B.A. Schwetz
(1973). Chlorinated dibenzodioxins and pentachloro-
phenol. Environ. Health Perspect. 5: 171-5.
Kehoe, R. A., W. Deichmann-Gruebler, K.V. Kitzmiller
(1939). Toxic effects upon rabbits of pentachlorophenol
and sodium pentachlorophenate. J_. Indust. Hyg. & Toxicol.
23.: 160-172.
Kimbrough, R. D. (1972). Toxicity of chlorinated hydro-
carbons and related compounds. Arch. Environ. Health
25(2): 125-31.
28
-------
Kimbrough, R. D. and R.E. Linder (1975). The effect of
technical and 99% pure pentachlorophenol on the rat liver,
Light microscopy and ultrastructure. Toxicol. Appl.
Pharmacol. 3_3: 131-132. (Abstract).
Knudson, I., H.G. Verschuuren, E.M. Den Tonhelaar,
R. Kroes, and P.F.W. Helleman (1974). Short-term
toxicity of pentachlorophenol in rats. Toxicol. 2:
141-152.
Larsen, R. V., G.S. Born, W.V. Kessler, S.M. Shaw,
B.C. Von Sickle (1975). Placental transfer and
teratology of pentachlorophenol in rats. Environ. Lett.
10(2) : 121-8.
Lehman, H. J. (1951) Quart. Bull. Assoc. Food and Drug
Officials 15: 122-33.
Levin, J-O,C. Rappe, and C. -A Nilsson (1976). Use of
chlorophenols as fungicides in sawmills. Scand. J.
Work Environ, and Health 2' 71-81. ~
Noakes, D. N. and D.M. Sanderson (1969). A Method for
determining the dermal toxicity of pesticides.
British J. of Indust. Med. 26; 59-64.
Ochrymowych, J., Western Electric (1978). Personal
communication.
Pleskova, A. and K. Bencze (1959). Toxic properties of
pentachlorophenol. Pracovni lekerstvi 11; 348-54.
Reichold Chemicals (1974). Report of May 28, 1974.
Schwetz, B. A. and P.J. Gehring (1973). The Effect of
tetrachlorophenol and pentachlorophenol on rat
embryonal and fetal development. Toxicol. Appl.
Pharmacol. 25_ (3): 455 (Abstract).
Schwetz, B. A., P.A. Keeler,P.J. Gehring (1974). The
Effect of purified and commercial grade penta-
chlorophenol on rat embryonal and fetal develop-
ment. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 28(1): 151-61.
Schwetz, B. A., J.F. Quast,C.G. Humiston,C.E. Wade,
G.C. Jersey, R.W. Lisowe, and R.J. Kociba (1976).
Results of a toxicological evaluation of pentachloro-
phenol sample XD 8108.OOL administered to rats by the
dietary route on a chronic basis. (Dow Chemical Co.
Report - unpublished).
Vogel, E. and J.L.R. Chandler (1974). Mutagenicity
testing of cyclamate and some pesticides in drosophila
melanogaster. Experientia 30(6): 621-3.
29
-------
3.2 Toxicity of Chlorinated Dioxins and Dibenzofurans
3.2.1 Toxicity of Chlorinated Dibenzo-p-dioxins
It has been reported that hexachlorinated, heptachlor-
inated, and octachlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins are found in
pentachlorophenol. Of the ten hexachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin
isomers theoretically possible, only six are predicted and
have been found in pentachlorophenol (Stehl and Crummett,
1977; Vogel 1977). Of these six, two (1,2,3,7,8,9- and
1,2,3,6,7,8-hexachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin) would be expected
to have marked toxicity given that the 2,3,7,8, positions
are halogenated. Previous toxicity studies have shown that
the single oral LD^Q of these two isomers in guinea pigs
ranges between 60 and 100 ug/kg (McConnell et al. , 1978).
The comparative toxicity of various dibenzodioxin isomers
does show a positive correlation between in vivo toxicity and
the ability of these isomers to induce arylhydrocarbon
hydroxylase (AHH) enzyme systems in chick embryos (Poland
and Glover, 1973). Utilizing AHH induction data to predict
toxicity, one predicts several orders of magnitude decrease
in the toxicity of the other four hexachlorodibenzo-p-
dioxin isomers (1,2,4,6,7,9-, 1,2,4,6,8,9-, 1,2,3,6,7,9-
and 1,2,3,6,8,9-). Specific toxicologic evaluation of the
other isomers has not been performed.
Chronic (two year) toxicity studies of a mixture of
two hexachlorodibenzodioxins is in progress at the Illinois
Institute of Technology Research Institute through an NCI
contract. The two isomers present in this mixture are the
1,2,3,6,7,8 and 1,2,3,7,8,9-hexachlorodibenzodioxins. A
hexa-chlorodibenzodioxin mixture (the specific isomer
composition is unknown) has been found to induce chloracne
in the rabbit ear bioassay as indicated by the formation of
comedones (Schwetz et al., 1973). In teratology studies,
this hexachlorodibenzodioxin mixture was found to cause
maternal toxicity in rats at a dose of 100 ug/kg/day; doses
of 10 or 100 ug/kg/day of hexachlorodibenzo-p-dioxins were
highly lethal to fetuses during late gestation. The weight
and length of surviving fetuses were also significantly
decreased. A significant increase in fetal abnormalities
was observed in offspring from rats that received the 100
ug/kg/day dose. Subcutaneous edema of the fetuses was
observed at a 1 or 10 ug/kg/day dose, whereas the 0.1
ug/kg/day dose did not yield any fetal anomalies. Schwetz
et al. (1973) also produced chick edema in birds treated
with 10 and 100 ug/kg/day of hexachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin.
30
-------
There are two heptachlorinated dibenzodioxin isomers
possible, both of which have been found in pentachloro-
phenol. Of these two, the 1,2,3,4,6,7,8- isomer would be
expected to be the more toxic. Specific toxicity studies
on this isomer are incomplete. In a guinea pig toxicity
study, animals survived a single oral dose of 180 ug/kg
with little or no toxicity observed (McConnell et al. ,
1978). Further studies are currently in progress at the
National Institutes of Environmental Health Sciences
(NIEHS) in which guinea pigs are receiving doses of 200,
400, or 600
The toxicity of octachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin is not
known. Oral doses of 1 g/kg did not cause death in five
female rats or in four male mice that received 4 g/kg
( Schwetz et al. , 1973). In a teratology study with
octachlorodibenzodioxin, no signs of maternal toxicity were
observed in rats that received either 100 or 500 mg/kg/day
of OCDD. No increase in fetal absorptions or fetal
anomalies was observed at the 500 mg/kg dose. The
incidence of subcutaneous edema was significantly
increased. In a chick edema bioassay, edema was not
observed in chicks that were maintained on a diet
containing 0.5% OCDD for 21 days (Schwetz et al. , 1973).
Table 3.3 summarizes relative dibenzo-p-dioxin/
dibenzofuran toxicity where data are available. Comparative
toxicologic data show that the pattern of toxicity caused
by dioxin isomers is the same as that produced by TCDD
(McConnell et al. , 1978). Experiments with carbon 14-
labelled TCDD indicated that dioxins pass the placental
barrier and are secreted in milk (Moore et al. , 1976). It
has been shown that TCDD causes immunosuppression (Vos and
Moore, 1974); increased susceptibility to bacteria (Thigpen
et al. , 1975); and fetal death or birth defects (Courtney
and Moore, 1971) .
3.2.2 Dibenzofurans
Relatively little work has been directed toward the
specific indentif ication of dibenzofuran isomers present in
pentachlorophenol. Preliminary work reported by Stehl and
Crummett (1977) records the presence of the 2,3,6,7- and
2,4,6,7-tetrachlorodibenzofurans and the 2,3,4,6,7-,
1,2,4,7,8- and 2, 3, 4, 7, 8-pentachlorodibenzofurans as well
as the 1, 2, 3, 6,7,8=hexachlorodibenzof uran. Quantification
of the levels of these isomers in pentachlorophenol was not
done due to interferences with other chemicals (chlorinated
diphenyl oxides). Of the isomers reported, the 2,3,4,7,8
31
-------
TABLE 3.3
TOXICOLOGY DATA SUMMARY
(single done)
Guinea Pig
Mice
Rat
Monkey (Rhesus)
A11H Induction In Chick Enbyro
Relative to TCUD
Teratogenic Doae pg/kg
Fetotoxlc Doae
Hlce
Rat
3-Generatlon Study - Rat pg/Kg
Reproduction - Primates
90-Day Study - Rat ug/Kg
2-Year Study
Chloracne
Chick Edema Bloassay (21-day)
Increased Disease
Susceptibility
•
DIBF.NZODIOXINS
Tetra
Ciiloro
W
2
114/283
22
<70
1
1
(mice)
1
0.5
0.01
NE 0.001
500 ppt
toxic
0.01
NE 0.001
In
Progress
Yea
lug/Kg/day
IMS/Kg
1/wk x 4 wka
• Hexnchloro-
Mlxture of
llcxa
loomers
100 .
(rat)
•?.io
• • • ** *
In
Progress
Yes
lOng/Kg/day
1,2,3,
6,7,8
70-100
1250
0.25
*v*
1,2,3,
7,8,9
60-100
>1440
0.25
•
1,2,4.
6,7,9
0.002
1*2,4,
6,8,9
1,2,3,
6,7,9
0.15
•
1,2,3,
6,8,9
lleptachloro-
1.2,3,4,
6,7,8
>180
0.15
•
1,2,3,4,
6,7,9
0.002
Octa
Chloro-
1,2,3,4,
5,6,7.8
>1, 000,000
)4, 000, 000
0.002
500 mg/K|'.
0.5Z in
Diet - Nr
D1BENZOKUKANS
Tetra
Chloro
2,3,7.8
>5<10
>6000
>1000
1000
0.7
lug/Kg/
day
Pcnts
Clilorc
2,3,4,
7.8
>3<-10
0.7
Uc.ia-
Chloro
1,2.3
6,7,3
lo effect
Data taken from references In sa^pion 3.2.4
-------
and 1,2,3,6,7,8 would be of prime toxicologic interest.
Toxicity studies with the 2,3,4,7,8-pentachlorodibenzofuran
have been performed in guinea pigs ( Moore, 1977). A single
oral dose caused death in 6/6 animals that received 30 or
10 ugAg- All animals survived a 30-day observation period
subsequent to receiving 3 or 1 ug/kg. Toxicity was
observed at the 3 ug/kg dose while only an increase in
liver size was seen at the 1 ug/kg dose. The pattern of
the toxic response is similar to that reported in studies
using the 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzofuran (Moore et al.,
1975).
3.2.3 Chlorinated Dibenzo-p-dioxin/Dibenzofuran Toxicity/
Contamination Associated with Exposures to PCP
The dibenzofurans and dibenzo-p-dioxins present in
pentachlorophenol have been responsible for animal health
problems. The chick edema disease problem of the 1950's
and 1960's was in part traceable to pentachlorophenol
contaminants (Firestone,1973).
Recent studies at the National Institute of
Environmental Health Sciences have identified the presence
of hexa-, hepta-, and octachlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins in
tissues from a dairy herd in Michigan. The results of
dioxin analyses of tissue samples taken from the herd are
summarized as follows:
Number of Number of Samples in which Detected
Tissue Samples Octadioxin Heptadioxin Hexadioxin
Liver 15 15 15 9
Fat 77 61
Range (ppb) 0.23-47.0 0.03-12.0 0.01-1.3
A possible source of these tissue contaminants was PCP-
treated wood used in the construction of a new barn in
which the cows were housed and fed (Moore, 1977).
Although the presence of toxic chlorinated dioxins in
tissues of food animals is a matter for serious public
health concern, there is insufficient evidence to conclude
that contaminants from PCP-treated wood were the cause of
illness in the Michigan cows. Van Gelder (1977) concluded
that although the contaminants were more toxic than the PCP
itself, they were not present in sufficient amounts to
cause illness. Controlled dosing experiments, recently
completed, may help answer questions raised by the Michigan
field studies concerning the pharmacokinetics and toxicity
of PCP and its contaminats in cattle (Moore, 1978).
Results of these experiments are expected in late 1978.
-------
3.2.4 References
Courtney, K. D. and J.A. Moore (1971). Teratology studies
with 2,4,S-trichlorophenozyacetic acid and 2,3,4,8-
tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin. Toxicology and Applied
Pharmacology 20; 396-403
Firestone, D. (1973). Etology of chick edema disease.
Environmental Health Perspectives, Experimental Issue
Number 5^:59-66.
McConnell, E. E., J.A. Moore, J.K. Baseman, and M.W. Harris
(1976). The Comparative toxicity of chlorinated
dibenzo-p-dioxin isomers in mice and guinea pigs.
Toxicology &^ Applied Pharmacology 37; 145, abstract
(Manuscript in preparation).
Moore, J. A. (1977). Memorandum to Director, NIEHS (March
21,1977), subject: Studies on Possible Pentachlorophenol/
Dibenzodioxin Intoxication Progress Report #2.
Moore, J.A. (1978). NIEHS. Personal communication. August
1978.
Moore, J. A., B.N. Gupta and J.G. Vox (1975). Toxicity
of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzofuran - - preliminary
results. National Conference on Polychlorinated
Biphenyls, (November 19-21, 1975), Chicago, Illinois,
Conference Proceedings, EPA-560/6-75-004.
Moore, J. A. , M.W. Harris and P.W. Albro (1976). Tissue
distribution of carbon 14 tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin
in pregnant and neonatal rats. Toxicology £ Applied
Pharmacology 37 :146, abstract (Manuscript in
preparation).
Poland, A. and E. Glover (1973). Chlorinated dibenzo-p-
dioxin: Potent inducers of -aminolevulinic acid
synthetase and aryl hydrocarbon hydroxylase. II. A
study of the structure—activity relationship.
Molecular Pharmacology j), 736-747.
Schwetz, B. A., J.M. Norris, G.L. Sparschu, V.K. Rowe
P.J. Gehring, J.L. Emerson, and C.G. Gerbig (1973).
Toxicology of chlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins.
Environmental Health Perspectives, Experimental Issue
Number 5: 87-100.
34
-------
Stehl, R. and W.Crummett (1977). Letter to Dr. Thomas
Bath, EPA.
Thigpen, j. E., R.E. Faith, E.E. McConnell, and J.A. Moore
(1975). Increased susceptibility to bacterial
infection as a sequela of exposure to 2,3,7,8-
tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin. Infection and Immunity
12_ (6): 1319-1324.
Van Gelder, G. A. (1977). Prepared statement on the
toxicity of pentachlorophenol and chlorodioxins in
cattle and laboratory animals and results of field
investigations of dairy farms in Michigan. Statement
presented at administrative hearing, Michigan
Department of Agriculture, Lansing, Michigan
July 18-22, 1977) .
Vogel, S. H. (1977). Presentation to PCP Ad_ Hoc Working
Group (March 3, 1978).
Vos, J. G. and J.A. Moore ( 1974). Suppression of
cellular immunity in rats and mice by maternal
treatment with 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin.
International Archives of Allergy and Applied
Immunology 47': 777-794.
35
-------
3.3 Human Poisoning Involving PCP
The EPA Pesticide Episode Review System Report (PERS)
No. 60 describes poisoning espisodes involving
pentachlorophenol which occurred from 1966 to September 1,
1976. A total of 64 alleged episodes were located, 47 of
which involved humans. Of these, 42 involved adults, four
involved children, and one did not specify the age group.
Three of the episodes involving children occurred at home
and one at a job. site. Eleven episodes involving adults
(over 17 years old) occurred in the home and 28 at various
job sites. Four of the human-related episodes involved
combinations of pentachlorophonel and active ingredients
other than chlorophenols and petroleum distillates.
Twenty-nine episodes involving humans (one a child
less than 6 years old) were associated with occupational
activities. Eight of these occurred at lumber-treating
establishments.
Six episodes occurred during construction activities.
Four of these involved individuals who were painting or
otherwise applying the chemical to structures, and two
involved carpenters who were working with treated lumber.
Five episodes occurred during occupationally-related
agricultural activities. One of these involved a child who
was splashed with the chemical while watching a man apply
it to a post. The remaining four episodes involved adults.
Two episodes involved commercial pest control
operators engaged in application of the chemical. In one
episode, a man sprayed PCP in the crawl space beneath a
house. He developed symptoms of weakness, headache, double
vision, tachycardia, nausea and hyperpyrexia. He recovered
after a short period of hospitalization. In the other
episode, an individual working for a pest control company
accidentally splashed the chemical into his eyes. This was
diagnosed as mild chemical conjunctivitis.
In another job-related incident, an employee at a
greenhouse worked for several weeks around benches which
were treated with the chemical; he subsequently developed
headaches and chronic coughing.
In one incident the affected person was working inside
a school building while pentachlorophenol and bromacil were
being applied nearby. A quantity of the mixture was drawn
into the building through an air intake duct and blew
directly into the face of a teacher. The only symptoms
reported were shortness of breath and weakness.
36
-------
Six episode reports concerning incidents associated
wdth occupationally-related operations did not specify the
type of job the affected individual was engaged in at the
time of the accident. Five of these were minor reactions
to the chemical; however, the remaining episode resulted in
the death of the victim. In this episode the individual
ingested the pesticide which was in an unmarked bottle.
The man mistakenly thought the bottle contained water; he
died enroute to the hospital.
In addition to those episodes which occurred during
job-related activities, 14 others took place in the home.
Of these, 11 involved adults and three involved children.
Of the three episodes involving children, one
occurred when a child spilled the chemical on himself,
resulting in a mild dermatitis; one involved a 5-year old
who took a small amount of the chemical into his mouth
without swallowing and recovered, the only symptoms to
develop were nausea and vomiting; and one in which the
report did not specify the circumstances of the episode.
All of the episodes affecting adults in the home were
the result of application of products containing
pentachlorophenol to the home. Five of these involved
reactions of persons other than the applicator to the
chemical after it was applied. Commonly reported in this
type of involvement was a protracted period of illness
which increased in severity over time. Three episodes were
reported in which individuals who applied the material were
affected. One of these was a minor reaction; however,
those remaining were quite severe and persisted for an
extended period. One involved an individual who applied
the chemical to the exterior of an addition to his home.
The man developed a severe cough persisting from at least
August through November 1974. This was allegedly in
response to an initial period of chemical application, with
more severe symptoms occurring after a second period of
application. The man was hospitalized for an extended
period. In the other incident the subject had a number of
manifestations compatible with poisoning by penta-
chlorophenol or other polychlorinated phenols shortly after
exposure to the product. These included excess
perspiration, nausea without vomiting, abdominal pain, dry
mouth, listlessness, and generalized dermatitis. Shortly
afterwards she also developed generalized pruritus and
several peripheral nerve manifestations, particularly
numbness and pain in the left first dorsal segment,
37
-------
generalized paraesthesia and Herpes Zoster of the tenth
right dorsal segment.
Two additional episodes involved individuals who were
opening cans of the chemical and were sprayed by the
material in the process. Symptom development was not
reported in either case. The final episode report was
submitted with no reference to circumstances of exposure or
the effects therefrom.
Four reports did not specify the episode location.
One of these did not contain information about the circum-
stances of exposure, one involved a can which exploded in a
man's face while he was opening it, one was an attempted
suicide, and one involved a 68 year old man who accident-
ally swallowed a mouthful of 2.5 percent pentachlorophenol
and recovered after hospital treatment.
Table 3.4 presents data showing the degree of
medical attention required in the 47 episodes of alleged
human poisoning from pentachlorophenol along with the
circumstances surrounding the episodes.
A study (.Sato et al. , 1978) conducted in Hawaii from
1967 to 1973 examined the clinical findings in workers
exposed to PCP. The concluding statement reads as
follows:
"The information gathered in this study suggests that
despite high chronic exposures to PCP, individuals in
the wood treatment group of workers had not undergone
any serious health effects from this exposure. The
only evidence of tangible health effects, part of
which could have been caused by exposures to chem-
icals other than PCP, were the low-grade infections
or inflammations of the skin and subcutaneous tissue,
of the protective membrane of the eye, and of the
mucous membrane of the upper respiratory tract. No
long-time (sic) effects could be elicited in the exposed
group."
3.3.1 References
Sato, N.M., H.W. Klemmer, L. Wong, E.L. Reichert, R.J.
Korsak, and N.N. Rashad (1978). Clinical findings in
workers exposed to pentachlorophenol. Draft report
USEPA, Washington, D.C.
38
-------
TABLE 3.4
Distribution of Human Episodes Resulting
from Exposure to Pentachlorophenol by Medical
Attention and Circumstances
(PERS 1966 to September 1, 1976)*+
Medical Attention
Circumstances
Total Number
of Episodes
Hospitalization followed
by death
Hospitalization followed
by recovery
Medical attention at a
doctor's office or
emergency room
Effects not requiring
medical attention
-Ingestion 1
-Chronic Exposure 1
-Unspecified 1
-Treated wood at home 2
-Attempted suicide 1
-Ingestion 1
-Exposed during nearby 1
application
-Contacted chemical during 1
application
-Spill 1
-Reaction to treated home 1
-Unspecified 1
-Contacted chemical during 9
application
-Exposed to treated object 4
-Container exposed 1
-Reaction to treated home 1
-Ingestion 1
-Exposed during nearby 1
application
-Contacted contaminated 1
object
-Unspecified 8
-Opening container 2
-Reaction to treated home 2
-Contacted chemical during 2
application
-Working with treated wood 1
-Unspecified 2
TOTAL ~TT
*A cause-effect relationship has not been confirmed between the
pesticide and reported reactions for all of these episodes.
+From the EPA Pesticide Episode Review System Report No. 60
39
-------
3.4 Human Poisonings Involving Exposure to Chlorinated
Dibenzo-p-dioxins
Over the last 30 years a number of cases of human
poisoning have occurred as a result of industrial exposure
to the chlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins. Although less well
documented, it is also possible that human poisoning has
occurred as a result of industrial and non-industrial
exposure to the chlorinated dibenzofurans. The references
on the next two pages list reports on cases of human
poisoning from industrial exposure to the chlorinated
dibenzo-p-dioxins. Most of these are exposures to TCDD.
Some of these reports (Baader and Bauer, 1951; Jirasek et
al., 1973; Jirasek et al., 1974; Pazderova et al., 1974)
represent dioxin poisoning in factory workers involved in
the manufacture of pentachlorophenol; these would represent
exposures to chlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins other than TCDD.
Chloracne was the predominant sign of toxicity
reported in these workers. However, a number of other
symptoms have been reported. These include emphysema,
myocardial degeneration, toxic nephritis, hypertension,
peripheral edema, anorexia, gastritis, weight loss,
bursitis, peripheral neuropathy, paraesthesia, headaches,
vertigo, coordination disturbances, fatigue, loss of
libido, easy fatigability, emotional instability,
pancreatic necrosis, polyneuritis, encephalomyelitis,
hyperpigmentation, hirsutism, eye irritation, oiliness of
the skin, hyperlipidemia and hypercholesterolemia.
A report recently issued from a January meeting of an
NIEHS/IARC ad hoc Working Group summarizes available
epidemiological and laboratory research on chlorinated
dibenzo-p-dioxins and dibenzofurans (NIEHS/IARC, 1978).
The report includes exposure incidents and discusses
several aspects of toxicity including chloracne, hepa-
toxicity, embryotoxicity and teratogenicity.
40
-------
3.4.1 References
Baader, E.W. and H.J. Bauer (1951). Industrial
intoxication due to pentachlorophenol. Industr. Med.
Surg. ££: 286-290.
Bauer, H. , K.H. Schultz, and U. Spiegelberg (1961).
Beruflich vergiftungen bei der herstellung von
chlorphenol-verbindunge. Arch . f_. Gewerbepath . und
Gewerbehyg. 18 ; 538-555.
Bleiberg, J. , M. Wallen, R. Brodkin, and I.L. Applebaum
(1964). Industrially acquired porphyria. Arch. Dermatol .
£9: 793-798.
Dugois, P. and L. Colomb (1957). Remarques sur 1'acne
chlorique. J. Med. Lyon 38; 899-903.
Goldman, P. J. (1973). Schwerste akute chloracne, eine
Massenintoxikation durch 2, 3, 6, 7-tetrachlorodibenzo-
dioxin. Der Hautarzt 24 ; 149-152.
Jirasek, L. , J. Kalensky, and K. Kubec (1973). Acne chlorina
and porphyria cutanea tarda during the manufacture of
herbicides. Cs Derm. 48; 306-317.
Jirasek, L. , J. Kalensky, K. Kubec, J. Pazderova, and
E. Lukas (1974). Acne chlorina, porphyria cutanea tarda and
other manifestations of general intoxication during the
manufacture of herbicides. Cs Derm. 49; 145-157.
Kimmig, J. and K.H. Schultz (1957). Occupational acne
(so-called chloracne) due to chlorinated aromatic cyclic
ethers. Dermatologica 115; 540-546.
May, G. (1973). Chloracne from the accidential production of
tetrachlorodibenzodioxin. Brit. J. Ind. Med. 30:
276-283. ~ ~
NIEHS/IARC. (1978). Long term hazards of polychlorinated
d ibenzodioxins and polychlorinated dibenzofurans .
Joint NIEHS/IARC Working Group. International
Agency for Research on Cancer. Lyon, France 1978.
Oliver, R. M. (1975). Toxic effects of 2,3,7,8-
tetrachlorodibenzo 1,4 dioxin in laboratory workers.
Brit. J. Ind. Med. 32: 49-53.
41
-------
Pazderova, J., E. Lukas, M. Nemcova, M. Spacilova, L.
Jirasek, J. Kalensky, J. John, A. Jirasek, and J.
Pickova (1974). Chronic intoxication by chlorinated
hydrocarbons produced during the manufacture of sodium
2, 4, 5-trichlorophenoxyacetate. Prac. Lek. 26: 332-
339.
Poland, A. P., D. Smith, G. Metter, and P. Fossick (1971).
A health survey of workers in a 2, 4-D and 2, 4, 5-T plant.
Arch. Environ. Health 22; 316-327.
Schultz, K. H. (1957). Untersuchungen zur atiologie der
Chloracne. Arch. Klin, exp. Derm. 206; 589-596.
Schultz, K. H. (1968). Clinical picture and etiology of
chloracne. Arbeitsmed. - Socialmed. - Arbeitshyg. 3^ 25-29,
Taylor, J. S. (1974). Chloracne - A continuing problem.
Cutis 13: 585-591.
42
-------
4. Mechanistic Relationships in the Toxicity of Compounds
Structurally Related to the Chlorinated
Dibenzo-p-dioxins
The chlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins appear as trace
contaminants in the commercial synthesis of certain
chlorinated phenol products. Clinical-epidemiologic
investigations of industrial and environmental accidents
involving these compounds and laboratory investigations
have established the extraordinary toxic potency of certain
chlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and the potential human
health hazards they pose. Less well appreciated is the
similar spectrum of toxic effects produced by certain
chlorinated dibenzofurans, chlorinated azoxy- and azo-
benzenes, polychlorinated biphenyls and polybrominated
biphenyls. We wish to draw attention to these compounds as
a group: 1) their similar toxic spectrum, 2) their
isosterism in chemical structure, and 3) their similar
biochemical actions.
The prototype dibenzo-p-dioxin, 2,3,7,8-tetra-
chlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD), produces a number of well
defined toxic actions in laboratory animals and human
beings. 1) Lethality - While the cause is unknown there is
an order of species sensitivity—guinea pigs and chickens
are very sensitive, rats and mice much less so. 2) Chlor-
acne and Hyperkeratosis - Reported in humans, rabbits and
hairless mice. 3) Involution of Lymphoid Tissue -
Particularly thymus"also in spleen and lymph nodes. In
young animals this is reported to be accompanied by
suppression of the immune response. Thymic involution has
been seen in guinea pigs, rats and mice. 4) Terato-
genicity, Embryo Toxicity and Fetal Wastage -Has been
demonstrated in rats and mice. 5) Edematous Syndrome-Young
chickens (and occasionally in mice)"6) Liver Toxicity -
Seen in rats, rabbits and mice. Liver necrosis is greatest
in rats and rabbits; distinct histologic damage is seen in
mice. Little or no damage is seen in guinea pigs. 7)
Disturbance in porphyria metabolism - Induction of
aminolevulinic acid (ALA) synthetase in chicken embryos.
Porphyria in mice and chickens and presumably the causative
agent of porphyria cutanea tarda seen in factory workers.
The administration of TCDD and certain other
chlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins to chicken embryos, rats and
mice induces a number of hepatic enzyme activities, the most
well studied of these being aryl hydrocarbon hydroxylases
(AHH) (Poland and Glover, 1973, 1974) and 6 -aminolevulinic
acid (ALA) synthetase (Poland and Glover, 1973). The
capacity of halogenated dibenzo-p-dioxin isomers to induce
43
-------
hepatic ALA synthetase and AHII activities (in the chicken
embryo) was found to have a well-defined, structure activity
relationship: 1) halogens in at least three and preferably
four of the lateral ring positions (positions 2, 3, 7, and
8); 2) the order of potency for substitution was Br> Cl> F>
NO2; and 3) at least one unsubstituted ring position --
octachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin is very weak or inactive.
This structure activity relationship for the
induction of AHH or ALA also corresponds to the structure
activity relationship for the lethality of these compounds
in experimental animals.
Recently, a binding protein has been identified in
the cytosol fraction of mouse liver which binds TCDD
reversibly with a high affinity (Poland and Glover, 1976a).
The binding affinity of other chlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxin
and halogenated aromatic compounds for this protein
corresponds to their biologica.1 potency to induce AHH; this
and other evidence suggest that this cytosolic binding
species is the receptor for the induction of AHH activity.
Recently it has been shown that certain chlorinated
biphenyls show symptoms of toxicity similar to the
chlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins when administered to chickens
and to rats. Thus, 3,4,5,3' ,4' ,5 ' -hexachlorobipnenyl
causes marked involution of the thymus, loss of
subcutaneous and visceral adipose tissues, liver necrosis
and hydropericardium when administered to chickens
(McKinney et al., 1976). Quite similar symptoms are seen
in chickens administered either 2,3,7,8-tetrachloro-
dibenzofuran or 2, 3, 7,3-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin. The
compound 2,3,4,3',4'-pentachlorobiphenyl has an LD^Q of
about 12 mg/kg in the rat with death occurring in about 11
days (Yamamoto et al., 1976). A marked decrease in body
weight, disappearance of fat from adipose tJcsues and liver
necrosis were the primary symptoms of toxicity in these
animals. These symptoms are very similar to those seen
upon administration of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibanzo-p-dioxin,
2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzofuran and other chlorinated
dibenzo-p^dioxins and dibenzofurans to rats.
44
-------
The major symptom of toxicity in man exposed to the
halogenated dibenzo-p-dioxins is chloracne. The outbreak
of chloracne in workers exposed to 3, 4, 3 ' ,4'-tetra-
chloroazoxybenzene and 3,4,3 .4'-tetrachloroazobenzane has
recently been reported (Poland and Glover, 1976b) .
These compounds, like 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-
dioxln and 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzofuran, are potent
inducers of arylhydrocarbon hydroxylase. They also have a
high affinity for a receptor for 2,3,7,8-tetrachloro-
dibenzo-p-dioxin recently described in rat liver by Poland
and Glover (1976-a)'.
Although the data is not extensive at this time,
there appears to be a strong correlation between toxic
symptoms produced by a number of halogenated aromatic
compounds. The prototype compounds are shown below:
2,3,7,8-tetrachloro-
d ibenzo-p-d ioxin
3,4,3',4'-tetrachloro-
azoxybenzene
«-
-------
4.1 References
McKinney, J.D., K. Chae, B.N. Gupta, J.A. Moore, and
J.A. Goldstein, (1976). Toxicology assessment of hexa-
chlorobiphenyl isomers and 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzofuran
in chicks. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 36; 65-80.
Poland , A. and E. Glover (1973). Chlorinated dibenzo-p-
dioxins: Potent inducers of 6 -aminolevulinic acid
synthetase and aryl hydrocarbon hydroxylase. Mol.
Pharmacol. 9^: 736-747.
Poland, A. and E. Glover (1974). Comparison of 2,3,7,8-
tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin, a potent inducer of aryl
hydrocarbon hydroxylase, with 3-methylcholanthrene. Mol.
Pharmacol. 10; 349-359.
Poland, A. and E. Glover (1976a). Stereospecific, high
affinity binding of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin
by hepatic cytosol. J. Biol. Chem. 251; 4936-4946.
Poland, A. and E. Glover (1976b). 3 ,4,3',4'-tetra-
chloroazoxybenzene and azobenzene: Potent inducers of aryl
hydrocarbon hydroxylase. Science 194(4265); 627-630.
Yamamoto, H., H. Yoshimura, A. Fujita, and T. Yamamoto
(1976). Metabolic and toxicological evaluation of
2,3,4,3',4'-pentachlorobiphenyl in rats and mice. Chem.
Pharm. Bull. 24: 2168-2174.
46
-------
5. Appendix A
SCIENCE ADVISORY BOARD
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH ADVISORY COMMITTEE
Ad Hoc Study Group on Pentachlorophenol Contaminants
Chairman;
Dr. Sheldon D. Murphy, Professor of Toxicology, Department
of Pharmacology, University of Texas Medical School at
Houston, P.O. Box 20708, Houston, Texas 77025
Members;
Dr. Donald G. Crosby, Professor and Toxicologist,
Department of Environmental Toxicology, University of
California, Davis, California 95616
Dr. David Firestone, Division of Chemistry and Physics,
HFF-147, Food and Drug Administration, 200 C Street, S.W.,
Washington, D.C. 20204
Dr. Virgil H. Freed, Department of Agricultural Chemistry,
Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon 97331
Ms. Dorothy B. Hood, Consultant, Toxicology, Haskell
Laboratory for Toxicology and Industrial Medicine,
E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company, Wilmington,
Delaware 19898
Dr. John Moore, National Institute of Environmental Health
Sciences, P.O. Box 12233, Research Triangle Park,
North Carolina 27709
Dr. Robert A. Neal, Director, Center in Toxicology,
Department of Biochemistry, Vanderbilt Medical School,
Nashville, Tennessee 37323
Dr. Alan Poland, Assistant Professor, McArdle Laboratory
for Cancer Research, University of Wisconsin, Madison,
Wisconsin 53706
SAB Staff Officers;
Mr. Ernst Linde, Scientist Administrator, Science Advisory
Board, A-101, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
Washington, D.C. 20460 Phone: (703) 557-7720
Mr. A. Robert Flaak, Science Advisory Board, A-101, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C. 20460
47
-------
APPENDIX B
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
WASHINGTON. O.C. 2C460
. ' January 12, 1977
Of r«CC OF THE
ADMINISTRATOR
SUBJECT: Charge to ad hoc Study Group on Pentachlorophenol Contaminants
FROM: Chairmn, Environmental Health Advisory Committee
TO: Study Group Mieisbers • ' .
A recent inquiry from EPA has been referred to the Environmental
Health Advisory Committee (EIAC). The request (attached) asks for
opinion as to the implications regarding hazard to human health of the
observed presence of various chlorinated dibenzcaioxin iscmers iri.
pentachlorophenol (TCP). .
•The Environmental Health Advisory Committee feels that this inquiry
provides a timely opportunity to review, rather more broadly than the
original inquiry implied, the toxicology and analytical methodology
pertinent to both the chlorinated dibenzofurans and the dibenzodicxin
isoraers.
Accordingly, we ask the study group to review and report in summary
form on the available information (with particular emphasis an recent
work) on the chemistry and toxicology of the dibenzodioxins and dibenzo-
furans. . • . .. • . .. •
To the extent possible, it would also be desirable to comment on
the potential hazard to humans which can be attributed to registered
uses of PCP and the extent that this hazard may be mitigated by use of
the commercial process which results in lower levels of the contaminants
of interest. It would be most helpful if you can complete your work by
Jiarch 25 so that the Committee will have an opportunity to study your
report before acting to advise the Agency at its April 19 meeting'.
• • *
•Norton N'elson
cc: Ernst Linde
-------
7. APPENDIX C
7.1 Chemistry of PCP and its Contaminants
7.1.1 Commercial Synthesis of PCP and
Formation of By-products 50
7.1.2 Composition of Commercial PCP 52
7.1.3 Formation of Chlorodioxins and
Chlorofurans During Commercial
Synthesis of PCP 56
7.1.4 Chemical and Physical Properties
of PCP, Chlorodioxins and
Chlorofurans 60
7.1.5 Reactions 65
7.1.6 Methods of Analysis 72
7.2 Environmental Contamination and Exposure
7.2.1 Environmental Behavior of PCP and
its Contaminants 76
7.2.n Occupational Use and Exposure 82
7.2.3 Environmental Transport and Exposure.... 83
7.2.4 Food and Feed 84
7.2.5 Biological Uptake and Concentration 84
7.2.6 Sources of Exposure 86
49
-------
7. Appendix C
7.1 Chemistry of Pentachlorophenol and its Contaminants
•
7.1.1 Commercial Synthesis of PCP and Formation of
By-Products
Chlorinated phenols, including PCP/ are excellent
bactericides and fungicides and have been widely used for
these purposes since the 1930s. Two commerical processes
are available for the manufacture of PCP. One process in-
volves the alkaline hydrolysis of hexachlorobenzene, and
the other process involves direct chlorination of phenol or
a mixture of chlorophenols (Doedens, 1964; Sittig, 1969).
Pentachlorophenol is produced in the United States
solely by the chlorination of phenol (American Wood
Preservers Institute, 1977). The overall reaction
follows:
OH
5 Cl
A1C1, (catalyst)
130°C
•f 5 HC
Cl
The chlorination is carried out at substantially
atmospheric pressure using two reactors. The temperature
of the phenol in the primary reactor at the start is in the
range of 65-130°C (generally 105°C) and is held in this
range until the melting point of the product reaches
95°C. About three to four atoms of chlorine are added at
this point:
OH
50
-------
Cl.
The temperature is progressively increased to maintain
a temperature of about 10°C above the product melting
poinjt, until the reaction is completed in 5-15 hours. The
reaction mixture, containing about 80% PCP is a liquid so
that no solvent is required, but catalyst concentration is
critical. Generally, 0.0075 mol of anhydrous aluminum
chloride is used per mol of phenol.
The off-gas from the primary reactor (largely HC1
initially and chlorine near the end) is sent to a second
reactor (scrubber-reactor system) containing excess phenol.
The reactor is held at such a temperature that the chlorine
is almost completely reacted to yield lower chlorinated
phenols, which may be separated and purified or returned to
the primary PCP reactor. The residual gas is substantially
pure HC1.
In the chlorination of phenol to form PCP, there is a
progressive increase in temperature to keep the reaction
mixture fluid. The higher temperature not only favors the
primary synthetic reaction but also, to some extent favors
formation of the various contaminants found in PCP.
The composition of technical PCP from different
sources varies somewhat. The PCP content is in the range
of 85-90%. Several percent of other chlorophenols are also
present, as well as a number of impurities including
chlorophenoxy chlorophenols, chlorodibenzo-p-dioxins,
chlorodioxins (1500-3000 ppm), chlorofurans (200-600 ppm)
and chlorodiphenyl ethers. The structure of these various
impurities is shown below.
The presence of hydroxydiphenyl ethers in tetra- and
pentachlorophenol has been discussed by Swedish chemists
(Jensen and Renberg, 1972; Nilsson and Renberg, 1974; Rappe
and Nilsson, 1972) .
Chlorophenoxy cMcrophenol
(predioxin)
Cl
Chlorophenoxy chlorophenol
({•sopred toxin)
chlorodipheny! ether
chlorodihydrcxydlphenyl ether
-------
7.1.2 Composition of Commercial PCP
Results of analysis of a commercial PCP (Dowicide 1,
Sample 9522 A), produced by Dow Chemical Company in June
1970 (Dow Chemical Co., 1971), and a purified grade of PCP
prepared by distillation of Dowicide-7 are shown in Table
7.1. '
The results of recent analyses of a number of domestic
(Dow) PCP samples for chlorodioxins and chlorofurans by
Swiss workers (Buser and Bosshardt, 1976) are shown in
Table 7.2.
The results of analyses of hexa- and octachlorodioxin
in various domestic PCPs (Crummett, 1975) are presented in
Table 7.3. . .
TABLE 7.1
Comparison of composition of commercial grade
and purified grade Pentachlorophenol (PCP)
Analytical Results
Component • Commercial8 Purified"
(Dowicide 7) (Dowicide EC-7)
Pentachlorophenol 88.4% 89.8%
Tetrachlorophenol 4.4% 10.1%
Trichlorophenol 0.1% 0.1%
Chlorinated phenoxyphenols 6.2%
Octachlorodioxins 2500 ppm 15.0 ppm
Heptachlorodioxins 125 ppm 6.5 ppm
Hexachlorodioxins 4 ppm 1.0 ppm
Octachlorodibenzofurans 80 ppm ... 1»0 ppm
Heptachlorodibenzofurans 80 ppm 1.8 ppm
Hexachlorodibenzofurans 30 ppm 1.0 ppm
^Sample 9522 A
Technical grade PCP reduced by distillation
52
-------
Table 7.2
Chlorodioxins and Chlorofurans in Dow PCP Products
(Suser and Bosshardt, 1976)
PCDD^Dpm
Samel es
PCP(EC-7)
PCP(EC-7)
PCP(c)
Pcp(c)
PCP-Na^c^
PCP .
PCP
Hexa-
0.15
0.03
9.5
9.1
3.4
10.0
5.4
Hepta-
1.1
0.6
125
180
40
130
130
Oc-2-
5.5
8.0
160
280
115
210
370
Tetra-
0.45
<0.02
<0.02
0.05
<0.02
0.20
0.07
PCDF^oom
Penta-
0.03
<0.03
0.05
• 0.25
0.05
0.20
0,20
Hexa-
0.3
<0.03
15
36 '
11
13
9
Heosa-
0.5
<0.1
95
320
50
70
60
Octa-
0.2
<0.1
105
210
24
55
65
(a) PCDD = Polychlordibenzo-p-dioxin
(b) PCDF - Polychlorod.ibenzofuran
(c) Dow product, supplied by Fluka, a laboratory chemical supplier.
Table 7.3
Hexa- and Octachlorodioxins in'.Domestic PCPs
(Crummett, 1975)
Sample Mfgr Hexachlorodioxin3 Octachlorodioxin
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
(a)
Vulcan
II
II
Reichhold
n
Monsanto
Dow
lOppm
N.D.
15
16
20
17
23
N.D.
15
12
15
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
16
16
21
1700ppm
N.D.
2500
3600
700
600
900
N.D.
1400
1100
1900
2
2
N.D.
1500
1800
3400
Detection limit 0.3 ppm, except for sample 8 which is 2
ppm; N.D. = not detected.
(b) Dection limit 1 ppm, except for sample 8.which is 6
ppm; N.D. = not detected.
-------
A composite lot of PCP (Lot MB-306) was recently
prepared from samples from each of the three domestic
producers of technical PCP. This sample, analyzed by
Monsanto (Vogel et al. , 1976), gave the following results
(see also Table 7.4 below, which gives results of GC-MS
analysis of a sample of Monsanto PCP):
Hexa- Hepta- Octa-
PCDD, ppm 11 199 1170
PCDF, ppm 19 81 137
Since the structure-biological activity relationships
of the individual hexa- and heptachlorodioxin isomers vary
considerably (Poland et al., 1976; McConnell et al. ,
1978), it is also necessry to determine the levels of
individual isomers in PCP samples. However, little
information is available on the levels of individual
chlorodioxin or chlorofuran isomers in PCP. Estimates of
the relative amounts of hexa- and heptachlorodioxin isomers
in PCP (Dowicide 7) and a sodium pentachlorophenate
(PCP-Na) sample examined by Buser (1975, 1976) are given
in Table 7.5. The levels of individual dioxins were
estimated from chromatogram or mass fragmentogram peak
heights and the total recorded concentration of hexa- and
heptachlorodioxins.
Table 7.4
GC-MS Analyses of Monsanto PCP
(Goldstein et al., 1977)
HxCDD 8 ppm
HCDD 520 ppm
OCDD 1380 ppm
PCDF 40 ppm
HCDF 90 ppm
HpCDF 400 ppm
OCDF 260 ppm
The Dow Chemical Co. has been engaged in research
directed towards fractionation and identification of
contaminants present in various grades of PCP (Stehl and
Crummett, 1977). Results of examination of three Dow
products for hexachlorodioxin isomers are shown in Table
7.6.
54
-------
Table 7.5
Chlorodioxins in a Commercial PCP and PCP-Na Sample
(Buser, 1975, 1976)
Chlorodioxin
1,2,3,6,7,9-ClgD
1,2,3,6,8,9-ClgD
1,2,3,6,7,8-ClgD
l'2!3f,4/6',7,9-5l7D
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-C17D
1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9-Clj
ppm Chlorodioxin in
PCP-Dowicide 7 PCP-Na
1
3
5
0
63
171
250
0.5
1.6
1.2
0.1
16
22
110
Table 7.6
Hexachlorodioxin (HxCDD) Isomers in Three Dow Products
as Determined by Gas-Liquid Chromatography (GLC)
(Stehl and Crummett, 1977)
GLC
Peak
B
C
D
Relative Isomer'%, HxCDD Concentration
HxCDD Isomer
1,2,4,6,7,9-
(or 1,2,4,6,8,9-)
1,2,3,6,8,9-
(or 1,2,3,6,7,9-)
1,2,3,6,7,8-
1,2,3,7,8,9-
Dowicide G
-)
_ \
35
43
20
2
Dowicide 7
25
50
25
Trace
Dow Std 82-A
__
29
71
— • ~*
Ratios of 25-50-25 (Dowicide 7) for the A-B-C isomers
compare with Buser's values of 10-35-55.
55
-------
Table 7.7
Chlorodibenzofurans in Dow PCP Products
Tetra Penta Hexa
2,3,6,7- 2,3,4,6,7- 1,2,3,6,7,8-
2,4,6,7- 1,2,4,7,8-
2,3,4,7,8-
A list of Chlorodibenzofurans tentatively identified
by Dow chemists in Dowicide or EC-7 is shown in Table 7.7.
7.1.3 Formation of Chlorodioxins and Chlorofurans during
Commercial Synthesis of PCP
Chlorodioxins may be prepared in condensation
reactions from ortho-substituted chlorophenoxy radicals
(Kulka, 1961) or anions (Pohland and Yang, 1972). Accord-
ing to S.L. Vogel, Monsanto Industrial Chemicals Co.
(Vogel, 1977), dioxin formation occurs during commercial
synthesis of PCP via a series of reactions involving
phenoxy radicals. Phenoxy radicals are produced from
decomposition of polychlorocyclohexadienone produced by
over-chlorination of tri-, tetra-, or pentachlorophenol.
The phenoxy radical (an electrophile) attacks electro-
negative sites (ortho or para positions) on a polychloro-
phenol molecule to form phenoxyphenols which undergo
further reaction to form Chlorodioxins.
The decomposition of tri-, tetra-, or pentachloro-
phenol can also be catalyzed by chlorine (the chlorine
radical is the initiator). The tetrachlorophenol present
in commercial reaction mixtures (very little trichloro-
phenol is present) serves as a substrate for chlorine
radicals, limiting the chain reaction with PCP molecules
which accelerates PCP decomposition. The chlorination is
normally stopped when 3-7% tetrachlorophenol remains.
Further chlorination results in increased decomposition
(Table 7.8).
56
-------
TABLE 7.8
Reactions in Chlorination of Trichlorophenol
OH
ci
cl
a
CM
O Cl
o
o
a
»
o
o
a ci
a
CJ
*
•o
a
o
OH
Ox^a
iQl + CI
oY^
a
•
o
tlx-x,,
* TOT +• HCI
ci
Cl
OH
fc£ - ^;;^c-l6riQ
ci
Ci
a a a o
.C! ,-t ^ « ^ c.j
a
a "*r a CH
a a
J^u*
HCI
C!
OH
ci
'* * IQ
C/
a
ci
t- HCI
ci
Cl
cl
O OH
^%
Cl
Cl
CJ
HCI
Ci
Cl
a
a
ci a
a
a
o
a
57
-------
Rearrangement via a spirocyclic anion (Smiles
rearrangement) can yield additional isomers (Gray et al.,
1975). Highly alkaline conditions are required for
efficient operation of the Smiles rearrangement since the
reaction involves rapid equilibration of the anion forms of
a phenoxyphenol through a spirocyclic intermediate. This
is illustrated by the formation of 1,2,3,6,7,8- and
1,2,3,7,8,9-hexachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin from 2,3,4,6-tetra-
chlorophenol.
In the manufacture of pentachlorophenol a considerable
amount of HC1 is present, so the Smiles rearrangement is
unlikely. Dioxin congeners formed by normal and
spirocyclic rearrangement vs. the levels of individual
dioxin found in PCP (Vogel, 1977) are shown in Table 7.9.
The hexachlorodioxins found agree with those predicted to
form without the Smiles rearrangement.
TABLE 7.9
01oxin Congeners in Commercial FCP
Possible Dioxin Concaners in ?C?
No Smiles
jtearrancement
1,3,5,8 (100%)
1,2,4,7,9 (752)
1,2,3,7,9 (252)
1,2,3,6,3,9 (50%)
1,2,3,5,7,3 (252)
1,2,4,6,7,9 (25JS)
With Smiles
Rearrangement
1,3,6,3 (252)
1,3,7,9 (755)
1,2,4,7,9 (31.252)
1,2,3,7,9 (252)
1,2,4,6,3 (43.752)
1,2,3,6,7,5 (31.252)
1,2,3,6,8,9 (18.75%)
1,2,4,6,7,9 (12.52)
1,2,4,6,8,9 (12.52)-
1,2,3,7,3,9 (13.752)
1,2,3,6,7,8 (6.252)
1.2,3,4,6,7;9 (752) 1,2,3,4,6,7,9 (752)
1,2,3,4,6,7,8 (252) 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 (252)
1.2,3,4,6,7,3,9(1002) 1,2,3,4,6,7,3,9(1002)
(a) PCP producers composite sample.
Relative i
Iscrcers Found
None
None
40-50
20-40
Trace
20-40
ca 60
ca '40'
100
PC? in ppm
(a)
N.O.
N,D.
ca 15
ca 200
ca 1000
-------
Little information is available on the formation of
dibenzofurans during PCP production. Formation of
dibenzofurans can be explained by the production of
polychlorodiphenyl ether intermediates (Kulka, 1961;
Plimmer, 1973; Arsenault, 1976) which can lose chlorine to
yield dibenzofuran.
Cleavage of the polychlorodiphenyl ether in the
presence of HCl yields PCP and hexachlorobenzene.
OH
cirr^ci
ciJ^ci-
Cl
-JU cl
* Cl
Various free radical reactions might also yield a
number of biphenyl compounds.
cin*cr
n-l
n-1
OH
Cl
n
OH
59
-------
Mass spectral data obtained from analysis of contaminants
in PCPs (Firestone et al. , 1972) suggested that
polychlorohydroxybiphenyls were present in these products.
7.1.4 Chemical and Physical Properties of PCP, Chloro-
dioxins and Chlorofurans
7.1.4.1 Pentachlorophenol
The chemical and physical properties of compounds play
an important role in their behavior, persistence in the
environment, and biological effects. Properties of PCP are
given in Table 7.10. PCP is volatile in steam and soluble
in most organic solvents, although of limited solubility in
CCl^ and in paraffinic petroleum oils (British Crop
Protection Council, 1971). Also see Bevenue and Beckman
(1967) for data on solubility in various solvents.
Differential thermal analysis of PCP (Langer et al.,
1973) revealed a solid state transition at 75°C, followed
by melting below 200°C and vaporization above 300°C.
Prolonged heating in bulk above 200°C resulted in
formation of octachlorodioxin in a tar residue. Heating
the PCP in a sealed capillary at 250°C for ten hours
resulted in formation of about 50% polychlorophenoxyphenol
and a small amount of octachlorodioxin. Sodium
pentachlorophenate exhibited a strongly exothermic reaction
at about 360°C; upon cooling, essentially pure octa-
chlorodioxin crystallized.
TABLE 7.10
Physical Properties of Pentachlorophenol (PCP)
Molecular Weight
Melting point
Boiling point
Density
Vapor Pressure
Solubility H2o
Solubility of sodium salt,
Partition Coefficient
Molar Refraction
266.35
191°C
310°C (decomposes)
1.987
1.6 X 10~4mm Hg (25°)
1.2 X lO'-'-mm Hg (100°C)
40 mm Hg (211°C)
20 ppm at 30°C
33g/100g
1 X 105*01
53.5
-------
7.1.4.2 Chlorodioxins
Properties of various chlorodioxin congeners are given
in Table 7.11. The solubilities of 2,3,7,8-tetrachloro-
dibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD), hexachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (HxCDD,
a sample of mixed isomers), and octachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin
(OCDD) in several solvents (Stehl and Crummett, 1977) are
shown in Table 7.12.
The visible absorption spectra and electron spin
resonance spectra and g factors of a number of chlorodioxin
cation radicals have been reported (Pohland et al., 1973) .
The crystal structures of several chlorodioxins have been
determined by x-ray diffraction studies. The compounds
studied included 1,2,3,1,8,9-hexachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin
(Cantrell et al., 1969), and 2,7-dichloro-2,3,7,8,-
tetrachloro- and octachlorodibenzo-p-dioxins (Boer et al.,
1973). The x-ray diffraction data indicate that the
C-C1 distances shorten with increasing chlorine
substitution on the rings. This effect could result from a
reduction in effective electronegativity difference between
Cl and C as more electron density is drawn from the
aromatic ring, which should, in turn, result in increased
covalency of the C-C1 bonds and give shorter distances
(Boer et al., 1973).
Infrared spectra and characteristic frequencies of a
number of chlorodioxins as well as 2,8-dichloro- and
octachlorofuran have been reported by Chen (1973) .
7.1.4.3 Chlorofurans
Little information is available to date on the
physical and chemical properties of chlorofurans. It is
presumed that in the immediate future increased emphasis
will be placed on identification of specific chlorofuran
isomers occurring in commerical PCP and synthesis of these
compounds for chemical and toxicological study. Some
properties of several chlorofurans (Gray et al., 1976;
Page, 1976) are given in Table 7.13.
7.1.4.4 Chlorodiphenyl Ethers and Chlorophenoxy Phenols
Data on the physical and chemical properties of
Chlorophenoxy phenols are limited. Lundstrom and Hutzinger
(1976) prepared several Chlorodiphenyl ethers and also
cited a number of these compounds prepared by other workers
via various routes. The melting points of some of the
Chlorodiphenyl ethers are given in Table 7.14.
61
-------
TABLE 7.11
Physical Properties of Various Chlorodioxins
Estimated
Chlorodioxin
2,
2,
•i ,
1,
1,
I/
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
7,
3,
3,
*• r
2,
2,
2,
2,
2,
2,
2,
2,
-ci2
7-C1
7,
4,
3,
4,
3,
3,
3,
3,
3,
3,
8,
7,
7,
6,
6,
6,
1,
4,
4,
4,
3
:14
8-Cl5
8-C1,.
7,
3,
7,
8,
6,
6,
6,
9-C1
9-C1
8-C1
9-C1
6
6
6
6
7,9-Cl?
7,8-Cl7
7,8,
9-Cl8
Mol.
253.
287.
321.
356.
356.
390.
390.
390.
390.
425.
425.
459.
Wt.
08
53
87
42
42
86
86
86
86
31
31
75
M.P. "P" . « Vapor (b)
C Value13' Pressure
0.76 6.0 x 10~6
162 :. 0.86 3.6 x 10~6
306 0.51 1.7 x 10~&
206
241
240 0.94(d) 6.6 x 10~7
__ —
285
243 —
0.90 3.0 x 10~7
0.90
331 0.90 1.8 x 10~7
Molar UV Max
Refraction i'CHCI) rr\
302
305
71.4 310
72.6 307
308
310
81.1
315
317
85.9
--
90 :i 318
(a) Beroza, M. and M.C. Bov/man, "p" value determined for dioxin between hexane and acetonitrile,
J. Assoc. Offic. Anal. Chem. 4_8:358-370 (.1965).
(b) Vapor pressure estimated from data of Woolson (Woolson e_t al., 1973) .
(c) Estimated by summing atomic refractions.
(d) 1:^* value determined 'for mixture of hexachl^odioxin isomers.
-------
TABLE 7.12
Solubility of Several Chlorodioxins in Various Solvents3
Solubility in mg per liter
Solvent
acetone
anisole
benzene
chloroform
methanol
toluene
o-xylene
water 0.0002
— indicates no data
(a) Firestone observed that 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD is considerably
less soluble in organic solvents than other HxCDD isomers
The solubility of the 1,2,3,6,7,8-isomer in isooctane is
about 20 mg/1.
(b) Dow standard 82-A, a mixture of 71% 1,2,3,6,1,8-HxCDD and
29% 1,2,3,6,1,9-HxCDD and 1,2,3,6,8,9-HxCDD.
TCDD
90
—
470
550
10
—
_ _
HxCDD(b)
—
2600
1600
—
—
1800
_ _
OCDD
5
1700
1000
560
—
1500
3600
63
-------
Octacliloro
TABLE 7.13
Properties of Chlorinated Dibenzofurans
Molecular
Weight
Dichloro 209.1
2,4
3,7
2,0
Trichloro 243.5
2,4,6
2,3,8
2,4,7
2,4,8
Tetrachloro 278.1
1,4,6,8
2,4,6,8
2,3,6,8
2,4,6,7
1,2,7,8
2,3,7,0
2,3,6,7
3,4,6,7
Pentachloro 312.6
1,3,4,7,8
1,2,4,7,8
1,2,3,6,7
2,3,4,7,8
Heptachloro 381.6
Melting Vapor Pressure*3'
Point °C (Estimated) 25°C
/ \
185* /
116-117^}
189-191* '
/ i\
198-200r
202-203iaj
227-228l/d)
234-235^
-6
7.3 x 10 °
7.0 x 10"^
6.8 x 10"°
4.0 x 10"f
3.7 x 10~°
2.5 x 10~£
2.5 x 10"?
2.2 x 10~°
2.1 x 107
2.0 x 10~7
2.0 x 10~£
1.9.x l(f£
1.8 x 10"°
-fi
1.3 x 10 *
1.3 x 10"7
1.1 x 10~£
1.1 x 10
416.1
4.4 x 10
3.6 x 10
3.0 x 10
1.9 x 10
-7
-7
Molar
Refraction
60.2
65.0
(b)
•UV max
(CllCla) nm
69.8
74.6
84.2
89.0
(a) From data supplied by Dr. David Firestone—private communication.
(b) Calculated from Table of Atomic Refraction. ,
(c) II. Gtlman, ^t al.. ±. Am. Cliein. Soc., ^6:2473, 1934.
(d) A.P. Gray, et af., J. Or_a. Chein., 41(147^8, 1976.
256,302,313
257,294,310,323
259,309,316
263,272,297,320
256,266,297
-------
Table 7.14
Melting Points of Chlorodiphenyl Ethers
Diphenyl ether M.P.°C
2,4,4'-
2,2',4,4'-
2,3',4,4'-
3,3',4,4'-
2,3,4,5,6-
2,2' ,4,4*5-
2, 3', 4', 5'-
2,2',4,4',5
2, 3', 4,4', 6-
2, 2', 3, 4, 5,6,6'-
Deca-
51-52
70
oil
oil
132-133
oil
65-67
oil
36
147-148
224-225
7.1.4.5 Gas Liquid Chromatography (GLC) Behavior of
Chlorodioxin and Chlorophenol Congeners
The GLC behavior of various chlorodioxins and
chlorofurans on nonpolar (OV-101) and Polar (Silar 10-C)
columns is recorded in Tables 7.15 and 7.16. Retention
times depend on the number and location of chlorine atoms
in the ring system. Order of elution and retention times
of chlorodioxins on glass capillary columns is reported by
Buser (1975, 1976).
7.1.5 Reactions
7.1.5.1 Pentachlorophenol
PCP is relatively stable and will not decompose when
heated up to its boiling point; however, it is rapidly and
extensively degraded by ultraviolet irradiation in the
laboratory and by sunlight (when PCP is in solution) and is
decomposed by strong oxidizing agents (Bevenue and Beckman,
1967).
Similar to any phenol, the phenolic hydroxyl of PCP
takes part in nucleophilic reactions, e.g., it forms esters
with organic and inorganic acid and ethers with alkylating
agents such as methyl iodide or diazomethane. Electron
withdrawal by the ring-chlorines causes PCP to be unusually
acidic (pK,5,26), roughly comparable to propionic acid
(pK»4.9), and causes it to be a relatively weak nucleo-
phile while stabilizing its salts (sodium pentachloro-
phenate is a stable item of commerce). While the high
degree of chlorination makes the aromatic ring sufficiently
electropositive to form stable charge-transfer complexes
with electron donors, the ring chlorines are as resistant
to nucleophilic displacement under normal conditions as are
those of the chlorinated aromatic hydrocarbons.
65
-------
•TABLE 7.15
Chlorinated Oibertzofurans
GLC Retention Times Relative to
2,3,7,3-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD)
Conqener
2,4,-Clj,
3, 7-01 ^
2,4,6-CU
2,3,8-CH
2,4,7-01^
2,4,8-013
1 .i, 6, 8-01.
2; 4, 5,3-01,
2,3,6,8-Cn
2,4,6,7-01,
1,2,7,8-Ci:
2,3,7,3-017.
2',3,5,7-Cn
3,4,5,7-CIJ
1,3,4,7,8-01,
1,2,4,7,3-01^
1,2,3,6,7-Ci:
2,3,4,7,8-01^
C17
/-•] /
Clj
C18
(1) RRT = retention
(2) Data of O.W. Ph
OV-101(2^
0.24
0.25 ,
0.26
0.44
0.47
—
—
0.70
0.70
0.80
0.82
0.89
0.39
0.93
0.95
1.35
1.35
1.52
1.63
....
—
—
8.3
time relative to TCDD.
illipson, FOA; 2 m x 0.2 cm
Silar lOC^'
0.38
0.40
0.47
0.73
0.83
0.64
0.64
._
--
._.
1.26
1.04
' 1.5Q
1 .56
1.78
1.27
1.27
1.66
—
3.95
4.78
5.87
8.75
i.d. column packed with
3% OV-101; column temperature, 200°C.
(3) Data of O.W. Phillipscn, FDA; 2 m x 0.4 cm i.d.
3/c Silsr IOC; column temperafure, 200°C.
column packed with
66
-------
TABLE 7.16
Chlorinated Dibenzo-p-dioxiris,
GLC Retention Tiines Relative, to
2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorcdibenzc-p-dioxin (TCOO)
o\ c\\
.Conoener OV-101U' Silar 10CU'
2,7,-Cl2D — . 0.30
T,2,4-CUD • .0.49 0.52
2,3,7-Cl^D 0.55 0.54
1,3,6,3-C1,D 0.76 0.62
1,3,7,3-C1,D 0,38 0.78
2,3,7,3-CltO 1.00 1.00
1,2,3,4-ClJO 0.97- 1.01.
1 ,2,3,8-Cl-JD 0.99' . 1.04
1,2,4,7,3-Cl^O 1.57 1.56
1 ,2,3,4, 7-CT:D 1.70 1..76.
l,2,3,7,3-Cl50 1.80 1.82 -
1,2,4,6,739-C1,0 2.48 2.62
1,2,3,6,7,9-C1°0 2.73 2.92
1,2,3,4,7,3-CnO 3.05 3. 11
1,2,3,6,7,3-CHD 3.10 3.23
1,2,3,7,8,9-CUO 3.24 3.56
0
1,2,3,4,6,7,9-C17D 4.75 5.41
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-CUO 5.32 6.20.
CUD 9.1 10.3
o
(1) RRT = retention time relative to 2,3,7,8-Cl^O,
(2) Data of D. Firestone, FDA; glass coil, 2m x'0,4
2% OY-101 on 30-100 mesh Chromosorb WHP; column
(3) Data of 0. Firestone; glass coil, 2m x 0.4 cm i
Silar ICC on 80-100 mesh Chromosorb WHP; column
(4) EC Response = nanograms to give 1/2 full scale
at 16 x attenuation. Hewlett-Packard Model 571
(d.)
EC Response v '
(Silar IOC Column)
0.90
.0.38
0.40
0.32
0.41
0.40
0.25
—
0..41
0.41
0.33
0.23
0..36
0.40
0.37
0.42
0.60
0.70
0.84
cm i.d. , packed with
temperature 210°C.
.d. , packed with 1 .2%
temperature 200°C.
deflection (127 mm)
3A gas chroma tograph.
67
-------
Chlorination of PCP (or overchlorination of phenol
during PCP manufacture) can give rise to a series of
interconvertible nonaromatic cyclic ketones including
hexachloro-2,5-cyclohexadien-l-one, hexachloro-3-
cyclohexen-1-one, heptachloro-3-cyclohexen-l-one, and
octachloro-3-cyclohexen-l-one. Reduction of these
compounds under mild conditions or treatment with base
provides chlorophenols; for example, PCP is formed from
heptachloro-3-cyclohexen-l-one by boiling with aqueous
acetone or from hexachloro-2,5-cyclohexadien-l-one by
reduction with aqueous sulfur dioxide or potassium iodine.
Heat (as in a gas.chromatograph) also generates phenols
(Svec and Kubelka, 1975).
Pentachlorophenol, being a weak acid, reacts with
strong bases to give the corresponding water-soluble salts
at a pH of 5.0; the solubility of the sodium salt is about
79 ppm; at pH 8.0, the solubility is greater than 4000 ppm.
PCP is readily converted to the ether derivative, which is
useful for analysis by gas chromatography. PCP is a
powerful uncoupler of oxidative phosphorylation in various
tissues and apparently reacts with bovine serum albumin
(anion-anion reaction) to form a stable complex from which
the PCP can be liberated with strong base. PCP forms
colored electron acceptor complexes as do other phenol
derivatives (Hutzinger, 1969); these complexes are useful
for chromogenic detection and mass spectrometric
identification.
Treatment of PCP with powerful oxidizing agents
produces pentachlorophenoxyl radicals which combine
reversibly to form "dimers." For example, in the presence
of fuming nitric acid or nitronium fluoroborate, PCP
provides 2,3,4,5,6-pentachloro-4-pentachlorophenoxy-2,5-
cyclohexa-dienone (Chang, 1962). The radicals or their
dimers can be oxidized further to 2,3,5,6-
tetrachlorobenzoquinone (chloranil). Chemical oxidation of
PCP under anhydrous conditions was found to result in
production of the radical dimer 2,3,4,5,6-pentachloro-2-
pentachlorphenoxy-3,5-cyclo-hexadienone (Denivelle and
Fort, 1954).
Pyrolysis of alkali metal salts of PCP (300°C)
results in condensation of two molecules to form OCDD,
1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9-octachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (Sandermann et
al., 1957). The reaction proceeds through an intermediate
phenoxyphenol, now called a "predioxin," which is readily
detectable in technical PCP. Nonvolatile, polymeric
phenylene ethers are formed concurrently by reaction of the
chlorophenol at positions other than ortho. Small amounts
of initiators such as chlorine or hexachloro-2,5-cyclo-
hexadien-1-one allow OCDD formation to take place at
comparatively low temperatures (200°C) in high yield from
PCP rather than its salts (Kulka, 1961); and pyrolysis of
the chlorinated cyclohexenes themselves smoothly provides
OCDD (73% yield from hexachloro-2,5-cyclohexadien-l-one at
270 - 280°C), probably through a pentachlorophenoxy-
pentachlorocyclohexadiene such as 2,3,4,5,6-4-pentachloro-
phenoxy-2,5-cyclohexad ienone.
-------
Results of combusting wood and paper treated with PCP
or PCP-Na indicate that octachlorodioxin was not formed
during combustion with PCP. However, ppm levels of
octachlorodioxin are formed during combustion of paper
treated with PCP-Na (Stehl and Lamparski, 1977; Ahling and
Johansson, 1977).
The absorption of light energy rather than heat allows
PCP to undergo a number of reactions under very mild
.conditions; maximum light absorption lies in the ultra-
violet region (245. and 318 nm) . In either water or organic
solvents, PCP undergoes photochemical reduction to isomeric
tri- and tetrachlorophenols (Crosby and Hamadmad, 1971).
Nucleophiles, such as bromide ion, can displace chloride
from the PCP ring (Crosby and Wong, 1976), and in water the
predominant reaction is replacement of an ortho-, meta-, or
para-chlorine by hydroxyl to provide tetrachlorocatechol,
tetrachlororesorcinol, and tetrachlorohydroquinone,
respectively. The pentachlorophenoxide anion can also
displace chloride in sufficiently concentrated solution
with eventual cyclization to OCDD in water at ambient
temperatures (Crosby and Wong, 1976).
Photoreactions of PCP in organic solvents result
primarily in reductive dechlorination (Zabik et al., 1976).
The sodium salt of PCP in aqueous solutions yields a
variety of colored products when irradiated with sunlight
including phenoxybenzoquinones, chloranilic acid (2,5-
dichloro-3,6-dihydroxybenzoquinone), and 2,4,5,6-tetra-
chlororesorcinol (Munakata and Kuwahara, 1969). Plimmer et
al. (1973) showed that alkaline aqueous solutions of PCP,
irradiated with light in the 300-350 nm region, yielded
octachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin. Although a free radical
mechanism was proposed to account for the observed products
of unsensitized photolysis of PCP-Na (Munakata and
Kuwahara, 1969), Crosby and Wong (1976) demonstrated that
octachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin is generated photochemically
from PCP in dilute aqueous sodium hydroxide by a cycli-
zation process analogous to its generation from PCP by heat
(Sandermann et al., 1957). This mechanism involves
photonucleophilic displacement of chloride ions from PCP by
pentachlorophenoxide ion.
CJ
69
-------
7.1.5.2 Chlorinated Dibenzodioxins
OCDD and related cyclic ethers appear to be rather
stable chemically/ perhaps due to their planar and
electropositive rings. For example, OCDD distills
(sublimes) unchanged at 350°C and can be recovered
quantitatively from hot sulfuric acid (Sandermann et al. ,
1957). However, these polychlorinated ethers share with
PCP the facile photochemical reduction upon ultraviolet
irradiation. For example, in the presence of an organic
solvent as hydrogen donor, 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-
dioxin is rapidly dechlorinated via tri- and dichloro-
dioxins (Crosby et al., 1971); di-and octachloro-dibenzo-
furans are dechlorinated more slowly, and the rate of OCDD
photoreduction is still slower although transient hepta-
and hexachlorodioxins are detectable.
These compounds are relatively stable and only slowly
biodegradable. When dissolved in concentrated sulfuric
acid or trifluoromethanesulfonic acid with oxidizing
agents such as f^C^ or KNO-j or with ultraviolet
irradiation, blue to blue-green colored species are
obtained, due to formation of cation radicals (Pohland et
al., 1973; Yang and Pohland, 1973).
CF,SO,H —-
J J C"~
TCDD (2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin) is quite
stable to 700°C (50% decomposition at this temperature
after 21 second exposure), whereas decomposition is com-
plete at 800°C after 21 second exposure (Stehl et al. ,
1973) .
TCDD is stable in refluxing aqueous alkali solution
(50 ml of 32% aqueous KOH solution plus 20 ml ethanol)
whereas other higher chlorinated dioxins decompose at
varying rates (first-order reaction), presumably due to
hydrolysis (nucleophilic displacement of halogen by
hydroxyl groups) (Firestone, 1977). Estimated half-lives
(t 1/2) of several dioxin congeners in refluxing KOH
solution are shown in Table 7.17.
70
-------
Table 7.17
Estimated Half-Lives (t 1/2) of
Several Chlorodioxins in Refluxing KOH Solution ^a'
Congener t 1/2
1,2,3,5,7,8- and 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD 7 hrs
1,2,4,6,7,9- and 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD 2 hrs
1,2,3,4,6,7,8- HCDD 23 min
1,2,3,4,6,7,9-HCDD 16 min
1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9-OCDD 4.5 min
(a) 10-40 ng chlorodioxin refluxed gently with 50 ml of 32%
aqueous KOH solution and 20 ml ethnol.
Crosby et al. (1971, 1973) found that TCDD is
rapidly photodecomposed (by reductive dechlorination) in
alcohols whereas octachlorodioxin is much more stable. In
either sunlight or simulated sunlight, 2,7-dichloro-,2,
3,7-trichloro- and 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxins (5
mg/1 in methanol) were entirely decomposed in a few hours.
Kim et al. (1975) irradiated various chlorodioxin
congeners in isooctane as well as in methanol. The
photolysis rates of the Chlorodioxins in methanol solvent
were similar to those reported by Crosby et al. (1973).
While photochemical dechlorination is by far the most
rapid known reaction of these compounds, three conditions
are required: the dioxin or dibenzofuran must be accom-
panied by an organic, hydrogen-donating solvent (such as a
pesticide or formulating agent), UV light in the wavelength
region of 290-320 nm must be present, and the light must
penetrate the solvent (Crosby and Wong, 1977). The rate of
photoreduction is inversely proportional to the degree of
chlorination, and, therefore, dechlorinated products do not
accumulate. Unlike PCP and 2,8-dichlorodibenzofuran, pure
OCDD and TCDD do not appear to be photolyzed in water at
appreciable rates due, perhaps, to their very low
solubility.
It has been reported that a hydrogen-donating solvent
is not required for photolysis to occur. There are
indications that a cellulose substrate will permit
photolysis.*
*See Testimony of Robert D. Arsenault, Koppers
Company, Inc., April 3, 1978, in "Testimony of Interested
Parties," section 8.2.3 of this report.
71
-------
It seems probable that the observed hexa- and hepta-
chlorodioxins are formed thermally from o-phenoxyphenols
(predioxins), detectable in technical PCP and originating
in the small proportions of tri- and tetrachlorophenol
present (Jensen and Renburg, 1973). (In environmental
samples, these dioxins can arise by similar ring closure by
photoreduction.) Other phenoxyphenols ("isopredioxins")
are also detectable and may account for the observed
dibenzofurans; dibenzofurans can also be formed photochemi-
cally by rearrangement and subsequent dehydration of £-
phenoxyphenols (Crosby et at., 1973). The original ~
pyrolytic conversion of a PCP salt to OCDD was accompanied
by a large proportion of hexachlorobenzene (Sandermann et
al. , 1957), suggested to arise from decomposition of
decachlorodiphenyl (Kulka, 1961), but this reaction has not
been confirmed.
7.1.6 Methods of Analysis
7.1.6.1 Pentachlorophenol
The review of PCP by Bevenue and Beckman (1967)
discusses a variety of colorimetric and chromatographic
methods of analysis, including gas chromatography.
Colorimetric methods suffer from lack of sensitivity and
from spectral interferences. Gas chromatographic methods
usually involve preparation of the methyl ether derivative
with diazomethane. Argauer (1968) prepared the
chloroacetate for detection of chlorophenols including PCP
by electron-capture gas chromatography (EC-GLC). Rudling
(1970) described a method for determining PCP in tissues
and water by acetylation of extracted PCP and analysis by
EC-GLC. The identity of PCP in sample extracts was con-
firmed by combined gas chromatography-mass spectrometry
(GC-MS). Farrington and Munday (1976) described the pre-
paration of chlorophenyl 2,4-dinitrophenyl ether for EC-GLC
determination of trace amounts of PCP and other
chlorophenols.
Barthel et al. (1969) described a method for deter-
mination of PCP in blood, urine, tissue and on clothing in
which the extracted, underivatized PCP was injected on a
GLC column containing 3% diethylene glycol succinate (DECS)
plus 2% syrupy phosphoric acid.
Fountaine et al. (1975) reported a procedure for
determining PCP in water by ultraviolet ratio spectro-
photometry. Fritz and Willis (1973) described the
chromatographic separation of PCP and other phenols using
an acrylic resin, and Renberg (1974) reported an ion
exchange technique for determination of PCP in fish and
water.
72
-------
Yip (1971) reported a modified method for PCP and
chlorophenoxy acid herbicides in total diet samples
involving extraction of the sample with acetonitrile or
chloroform, methylation, Florisil chroma tography to sep-
arate PCP from the other herbicides, and EC-GLC. analysis .
Modifications, based on Yip's method, are currently used by
FDA for total diet analyses. However, the method suffers
from low and .erratic recoveries, particularly for high-fat
samples at the limits of detection (ca 0.01-0.02 ppm). In
some instances diethyl ether or diethyl ether-petroleum
ether (1:1) have been used as extracting solvents in an
effort to improve recoveries of PCP.
7.1.6.2 Chlorodioxins , Chlorofurans and Other
Contaminants in PCP
PCP contains a number of hexa-, hepta- and octachloro-
dioxins as well as other contaminants (Firestone et al. ,
1972; Woolson et al., 1972; Buser, 1975). Until recently,
EC-GLC had been used mainly for chlorodioxin analysis. But
because of the presence of other components, mass
spectrometry has come into use for specific detection and
confirmation of chlorodioxins as well as chlorof urans.
Villanueva et al . (1975) compared four methods
(Firestone et al. , 1972; Jensen and Renberg, 1973; Crummet
and Stehl, 1973; Rappe and Nilsson, 1972) for analyzing for
chlorodioxins in PCP. The Crummett and Jensen method,
which involved extraction of non-acidic material in PCP
with etherhexane (1:1), gave the best recoveries, although
the Crummett method, employing ion exchange to remove the
acidic components, was simpler than the Jensen method.
Crummett and Stehl (1973) employed GC-MS for
determination of hexa- and octachlorodioxin in PCP. Buser
(1975) developed a specific method for analysis of
chlorodioxins and chlorofurans in PCP and other chloro-
phenols. Phenolic compounds were extracted with alkali and
the neutral material chromatographed on a basic alumina
micro-column to eliminate polychiorinated benzenes and poly
chlorodiphenyl ethers. The fraction containing
chlorodioxins and chlorofurans was then subjected to mass
f ragmentographic (GC-MS) analysis at selected m/e values.
It is important to remove orjbho-phe no xy phenol isomers from
the extract since they can undergo ring closure by
elimination of HC1 upon injection in the gas chromatograph,
resulting in formation of a chlorodioxin (Jensen and
Renberg, 1973) .
73 '
-------
Recoveries were determined with hexachlorodioxin; the
values ranged from 85% at the 0.2 ug level (0.05 ppm) to
over 95% at the 10 ug level (2.5 ppm).
Buser and Bosshardt (1976) employed the GC-MS
procedure to examine a number of commercial PCP and PCP-Na
samples. Chlorodioxins and chlorofurans were detected by
mass fragmentography and their presence confirmed by
complete mass spectral analysis. Hexachlorodioxins were
recovered from PCP and PCP-Na samples with 80-95%
efficiency (0.1-30 ppm), and octachlorodioxins with 95%
efficiency (10-30. ppm).
Buser (1976) prepared glass capillary columns with 0V-
101, OV-17 and Silar IOC stationary phases for high
resolution gas chromatography of chlorodioxins and
chlorofurans. The best separations of hexachlorodioxin
isomers were obtained with the OV-17 glass capillary column.
Sample introduction was effected by a isothermal splitless
injection technique, using n-tetradecane as the solvent for
column temperatures in the range of 205-225°C. The use of
high resolution glass capillary columns permits the
detection and quantization of individual isomers.
Pfeiffer (1976) investigated the use of liquid
chromatography for determination of chlorodioxins in PCP.
The technique was found to be useful for paid examination of
non-phenolic impurities in PCP. Samples could be analyzed
in four hours with detection limits of 0.2 ppm for hexa-
chlorodioxin and 0.1 ppm for octachlorodioxin.
Vogel et al. (1976) evaluated three methods for ana-
lyzing for chlorodioxins in PCP. In method (A) (Blaser et
al., 1976) phenolics are removed by ion-exchange chrom-
atography, and hexa- and octachlorodioxin are determined by
GC-MS. In method (B), proposed by J.P Mieure and 0. Hicks,
Monsanto Industrial Chemical Co., phenolics are removed by
chromatography on slightly deactivated basic alumina, and
chlorobenzenes, chlorobiphenyls and chlorodiphenyl ethers
are removed by activated (super 1) basic alumina. Quant-
ization of chlorodioxins and chlorofurans is accomplished by
GC-MS. In method (C), also proposed by Mieure and Hicks,
chlorodioxins and chlorofurans are isolated by chromato-
graphy on activated basic alumina and examined by GC-MS (or
GLC). Good agreement was obtained between the three methods.
Method (B) was considered the most sensitive when MS
detection was used; methods (A) and (C), however, required
less time for analysis.
74
-------
Hass (1977) reported a procedure for analysis of
chlorodioxins in beef liver and fat samples involving solvent
extraction, 112804 cleanup, chromatography on basic
alumina and mass spectral analysis using either electron
impact (El) mass spectrometry or negative chemical ionization
(NCI) mass spectrometry (Hunt et al., 1975) in the selected
ion monitoring mode. Limits of detection of hexa-, hepta-,
and octachlorodioxin in liver (17-25 g sample) were 0.2-0.5
ng/g (El) and 0.005-0.1 ng/g (NCI); in fat (3-5 g sample) the
respective detection limits were approximately 2 ng/g (El)
and 0.01 ng/g (NCI) .
Firestone (1976) reported detection of 0.1 to 28 ppb of
total chlorodioxins (hexa-, hepta-, and octachlorodioxin) in
commercial gelatin. Samples after extraction and cleanup on
alumina and Florisil columns were examined by EC-GLC. The
presence of hexa-, hepta-, and octachlorodioxin and penta-,
hexa-, and heptachlorofuran in one of the samples (imported
from Mexico) was confirmed by GLC-MS. Photodechlorination was
used to confirm the presence of octachlorodioxin in some of
the samples.
The possible number of positional isomers of
chlorodioxins and chlorofurans are shown in Table 7.18.
Aryl hydrocarbon hydroxylase activity (AHH) for dibenzo-p-
dioxins and dibenzofurans are shown in Tables 7.19 and
7.20 respectively.
TABLE 7.18
Chlorinated Dibenzodioxins and Dibenzofurans
Isomers and Sources
Possible Number of Positional Isomers
No. of Isomers
Cl Substitution Dioxin Furan
Mono- 2 4
Di- 10 16
Tri- 14 28
Tetra- 22 38
Penta- 14 28
Hexa- 10 16
Hepta- 2 4
Octa- 1 l
75 135
75
-------
7.2 Environmental Contamination and Exposure
7.2.1 Environmental Behavior of PGP and its Contaminants
7.2.1.1 Atmospheric Behavior
Most compounds have a measurable vapor pressure at
ambient temperatures. It is this characteristic of the
chemical that gives an indication of the propensity for the
substance to escape into the air. Vapor pressure alone is not
the determining factor in the rate of escape or volatilization
since other factors such as absorption, heat flux, air
movement, i.e., the thickness of diffusion layer, and a number
of other factors are of equal importance (Hartley, 1969; Haque
and Freed, 1974; Plimmer, 1973). It is the rate of escape or
volatilization that is of interest in considering aerial
contamination and transport rather than vapor pressure, per
se. The rate of volatilization may be determined experi-
mentally, but, where constraints make this impractical the
rate of volatilization may be calculated using the vapor
pressure data by the following equation:
Q = 6 P
This equation gives an estimate of the rate of volatilization
in terms of g/cm2/sec when the material is vaporizing from
its own surface. However, when adsorbed on a solid surface or
within a matrix, the rate of volatilization is reduced by a
factor of 10-100 by adsorption forces. Where dealing with
compounds such as pentachlorophenol and its contaminants, a
conservative factor would be about 20 fold. In view of the
apparent strength of adsorption of these materials, this
factor is more likely to overestimate rate of volatilization
than underestimate.
Turning to the consideration of pentachlorophenol, we
observe that it has a vapor pressure of 1.6 x 10" _mm Hg at
25°C and this would yield a vapor density of 2.3 x 10~9
g/cm when evaporating from its own surface. Following
adsorption pn a solid surface, the calculated rate of evapora-
tion would be 1.7 x 10~10 g/cm2/
•/sec.
76
-------
TABLE 7.19
Oibenzo-p-dioxins (0):
Approximate Activity of.Congeners in Chick Embryo Assay
for Induction of Aryl Hydrocarbon Hydroxylate(l)
t~\ Approx. Activity,
Comoound Source^ ' • Relative to TCDD *
1,2,3,4,7-ClJD^
1 ,2,3,7,8-ClHD
1,2,3,6,7,8-01 "0
1,2,3,7,3,9-ClgO
1,2,3,4,6,7,9-CU
1,2,3,4,5,7,3-01^
1-01 0 A Inactive
2-C1 D A
1 ,3-01 0 B .
1,6-ClJD B .
1 ,9-Ci;o B "
2,3-Ci;D B,D
2,7-Ci;0 Af,E '
2,8-01 £0 . A
1,2,3-01 .,0 B ...
1,2,4-CnD A
2,3,7-Clp ' A,B,C 0.001
1,2.,3,4-ClJD A,B Inactive
1,2,6,7-Clp B 0.002
1 ,3,6,8-Cl,0 A Inactive
1,3,7,8-ClJD B 0.1
2,3,7,8-CljD (TCDO) A.B.C.D.E 1,0
A .. O.T
C 0.3
1,2,4,7,8-Cl^O C
1,2,4,6,7,9-01,0 A,C 0.002
1,2,4,6,8,9-CL?0 B
1,2,3,5,7,9-CnO C 0.15
1,2,3,4,7,3-0120 A,0,0 ' 0.3
° C 0.25
C 0.25
0 C 0.002
0 C 0.15
1,2,3',4,6,7,8,9-CLD A,E 0.002
o
2,3-Cl?(UL-U0)0^ 8 Inactive
2,3,7,3-a4(l,6-JH)0 B 1.0
(1) Activity data provided by A. Poland; see also Environmental. Health .
Perspectives (1973) 5:245-251; J. Org. Chem. (1974), 931-937; and
J. Siol. Chem. (19767 251_:4936-4945."
(2) (A) A.£. Pohland (See J. .Ag. Food Chem. (1972) -20:1093-1099); (b)
A.S. Kende (See paper ORGN 130, manuscript in preparation, 167th
Nat. Mtg. ACS, L.A., Cal., April 4, 1974); (C) A, Gray (See Tetra-
hedron Letters (1975) No. 33: 2373-2975 and j. Org. Chem. (1975) 4_1_
2435-2427; (0) J.O. McKinney; and (E) Cow Chemical Co. ,
(3) 2,3,7,3-TCOO is assigned a relative activity of 1.0.
(4) Contains 5% of 1,2,3,4,7,8-ClgO impurity.
-------
TABLE 7.20
Dibenzofurans (F) :
Approximate Activity in Chick- Embryo Assay for Induction of Aryl Hydrocarbon
Hydroxylase.1
Compound
2,4-Cl2F
2,8-Cl F
3'7'ci2F
2,3,4-Cl F
2,3,6-Cl>
2,3,7-Cl^F
2,3,8-Cl^F
2,3,9-Cl F
2,4,6-Clp- .
2,4,8-CljT
1,4,6,8-C1 F
1,2,7,8-C1*F
1,3,6,7-C1>
i,3,7,8-ci>
2,3,6,7-Cl>
2,3,6,8-Cl F
2,3,7,8-ClTF
2,4,6,7-Cl F
2,4,6,8-Clp1
3.4,6,7-Cl*F
1,2.3,6,7-Cl F
1,2,3,7,8-Cl F
1,2,4,7,8-Cl^F
1,3,4,7,8-Cl^F
2,3,4,6,7-Clp
2,3,4,7,8-Cl^F
2,3,4,6,7,8-Cl F
2,3,4,7,8,9-ClgF
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-C17F
1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9-ClgF
Source
D
A,B .:
B
B
B
B,C
B,C
C
C
B
F
C
B
B
B
B,C
B,C
B
B,C
B
B
B
C
C,D
B
B
B,E
B
B
A,B
Approx. Activity Relative to TCDD'
Inactive
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.001
Inactive
0.02
0.01
0.005
0.7
0.01
Inactive
0.01
0.2
0.2
0.005
0.1
0.7
0.2
0.3
0.2
0.002
Activity data provided by A.
251, 4936-4946.
Poland; see also J. Biol. Chem. (1976)
(A) A. E. Pohland: (B) A. S. Kende (See paper ORGN 130. manuscript in
preparation. 167th National Meeting, American Chemical Society, L. A. . Cal. ,
April 4. 1974): (C) A. P. Gray (See J. Org. Chem. (1976) "41, 2428-2434); (D)
I. H. Pomerantz; and (E) J. D. McKinney (in preparation); (F) S.W. Page (See
paper ORGN 63, manuscript in preparation. 172 nd National Meeting, ACS,
San Francisco, Cal, Aug. 30-Sept 3, 1976.)
2,3,7,8-TCDD is assigned a relative activity of 1.0.
78
-------
Table 7.21 presents the estimated vapor density and
rate of evaporation of chlorodioxins. The low vapor pressure
of the chlorodioxins coupled with the strong adsorption to
surfaces, as indicated by the high molar refraction and the
data of Kearney et al. (1972, 1973), lend credibility to the
values.
Table 7.21
Estimated Vapor Density3 and Rate
of Evaporation*3 (Q) of Chlorodioxins
Compound
2,7-di
2,3,7,8-tetra
penta
hexa
hepta
octa
•5 ^
Vapor Density (g/cm ) Q (g/cm /sec)
8.2 x
2.9 x
1.7 x 10~
1.4 x 10"jf
6.9 x ID"*2
4.5 x 10"12
6.1 x
2.0 x 10
1.1 x 10
8.4 x 10
4.0 x ID
2.5 x 10
~12
~13
(a) Above own surface, (b) from adsorbing surface.
According to Table 7.21, the rate of volatilization of
the chlorodioxins is very low. This low rate of evaporation
compared to pentachlorophenol could very rapidly explain the
findings of Levin et al. (1976).
Table 7.22 presents similar data for the chlorinated
dibenzofurans. The data here indicate a slightly greater
vapor density and evaporative loss for the chloro-
dibenzofurans. This would be expected of compounds of
slightly lower molecular weight, higher vapor pressure, and
lower molar refraction.
TABLE 7.22
Estimated Vapor Density3 and Rate of
*3
Compound
Evaporation*3 (Q) of Chlorinated Dibenzofurans
Vapor Density (g.cm3) Q (g/cm2/sec)
2,4-di
2,4,6-tri
2,3,7,8-tetra
1,4,6,8-tetra
2,3,4,7,8-pen
1,3,4,7,8-pen
penta
penta
8.2 x 10
5.2 x 10
3.0 x 10
3.7 x lO
1.9 x lO
2.2 x 10
4.3 x 10
6.8
4.0 x 10'12
2.1 x 10~^2
2.7 x 10~J-2
'
1.3 x
1.5 x
2.5 x
10~
(a) Above own surface, (b) from adsorbing surface.
79
-------
Although PCP has a relatively high vapor pressure (1.6 x
10"4 torr at 25°C and 3.1 x 10~3 torr at 50°C, the
temperature of a sunlit surface), there is evidence that it
may be slow to volatilize. However, its volatilization from
wood into an enclosed airspace is measurable, and the
atmosphere in a wood-treatment plant has been shown to contain
as much as 1.7 ug/m3 of PCP (Wyllie et al., 1975). PCP has
been detected in rainfall (Bevenue et al., 1972), but the
possibility remains that of this may have been due to its
presence on airborne particles rather than as atmospheric
vapor. Laboratory experiments indicate that PCP vapor is
stable to sunlight.
No evidence exists concerning the presence of dioxins or
dibenzofurans in air. The solubility and vapor pressure of
TCDD and OCDD are roughly similar to those of DDT, and DDT is
known to volatilize readily from soil and rapidly from water.
Neutral PCP impurities might logically be expected to behave
similarly, but their vapor should be stable to light.
7.2.1.2 Behavior in Soil
Three processes are of significance in soil. These are
adsorption, leaching and breakdown (Hamaker, 1975; Haque and
Freed, 1974). Adsorption occurs predominantly on the organic
matter (Hartley, 1969) and clay of soil, though the coarser
mineral particles also adsorb. Laboratory measurements that
have been shown to correlate well with adsorption include
molar refraction, latent heat of solution, and partition
coefficient. Based on this, one would expect that penta-
chlorophenol and its various contaminants would all be
relatively strongly adsorbed by soil.
A number of studies have been performed on the soil
behavior of pentachlorophenol. PCP is adsorbed to a moderate
degree under acidic conditions (as neutral molecules) but
moves quite readily in ionized form (under neutral or alkaline
conditions) (Kuwatsuka, 1972). Adsorption is greatest in a
soil in the pH range of 4.6-5.1, with very little adsorption
above pH 6.8 (Choi and Amoine, 1974). Microbial degradation
is relatively rapid, especially in wet soil where a variety of
tetra-, tri-, and dichlorophenols are formed; meta-chlorines
are the most stable (Ide et al., 1972). In aerated soil,
oxidation and methylation to pentachloroaonisole and 2,3,5,6-
tetrachlorol,4-dimethoxybenzene represent major routes of
degradation. Similarly, Kearney et al. (1973) and others
indicate a strong adsorption of 2,3,7,8-tetrachloro-
dibenzodioxin and octachlorodioxin (Arsenault, 1976).
Neither pentachlorophenol (Bevenue and Beckmen, 1967;
Arsenault, 1976; Kearney et al., 1973) nor the dioxins have
been found to leach readily in soil, largely because of the
strong adsorption.
80
-------
The breakdown of pentachlorophenol and chlorodioxins in
soil have been incompletely studied. In the case of penta-
chlorophenol, it is known that the breakdown is fairly rapid
(5 to 8 weeks in a moist soil at rates up to 20 Ibs/acre).
Kearney et al. (1972, 1973) report a half-life of approxi-
mately one year for 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin in
soil; the number of species of microorganisms attacking the
chemical appears limited (Matsumura and Benezet, 1973).
The fate of PCP and its impurities in or on treated wood
is not known, but practical experiments indicate that PCP
remains fungicidally effective for years (Arsenault, 1976).
PCP conceivably could generate OCDD in sunlight, but the usual
presence of hydrocarbon solvents would tend to promote
eventual dioxin photolysis on the wood surface. The burning
of PCP-treated wood or sawdust generates OCDD which sub-
sequently volatilizes, but the proportion is small in com-
parison to that already present in the wood (Crosby et al.,
1973; Stehl et al., 1973; Jensen and Renberg, 1973). (There
is a report, presently discounted, that TCDD forms similarly
from organic matter containing trichlorophenol derivatives
(Buu-Hoi et al., 1971), but attempts to repeat the observation
have failed.)
7.2.1.3 Behavior in Aquatic Systems
7.2.1.3.1 Physical Behavior
The transport and persistence of PCP and sodium PCP in
aquatic systems has been extensively studied, particularly
where these chemicals had been used as a molluscicide (Strufe,
1968). Here it has been found that the material is rapidly
adsorbed on suspended particulates. Where there is a heavy
load of sediment in the water, the concentration of PCP or
sodium PCP is rapidly reduced in the aqueous phase and the
material settles to the bottom with these particles. PCP,
both as a free phenol and as a sodium salt, has been found to
undergo quite rapid degradation in water, both from sunlight
and anaerobic processes in the bottom mud.
Little information is available on behavior and fate of
the chlorodioxins and the chlorodibenzofurans in aquatic
systems, but it would seem correct to infer that with their
greater propensity for adsorption they would even more rapidly
and tightly bind to sediment than PCP. Since the biological
activity of pentachlorophenol has been shown to be markedly
reduced by the adsorption (Strufe, 1968), it would be presumed
that the same would hold true for the dioxins and dibenzo-
furans.
7.2.1.3.2 Breakdown in Aquatic Systems
In dilute aqueous solutions exposed to sunlight, PCP or
its salts undergo the replacement of ring chlorines by
hydroxyl groups described above. The resulting tetrachloro-
hydroquinone and tetrachlorocatechol are readily oxidized by
air to quinones which in turn are dechlorinated. If the
original PCP solution is sufficiently concentrated (as in the
81
-------
case of a rice-paddy), the tetrachlorodiphenols can react with
the quinones to give a variety of nontoxic minor products.
However, under most circumstances, the quinone solution is
rapidly degraded to dichloromaleic acid which itself is
converted to small fragments within a few days (Wong, 1977).
Considering the similarity between the vapor pressures
and solubilities of TCDD or OCDD and DDT, one might expect
more rapid volatilization of dioxins from water than from
soil. As mentioned, dioxins in water appear stable to light
due, perhaps, to their insolubility. In view of their high
degree of adsorption to particulate matter, the amount in
solution would be expected to be low (Matsumura and Benezet,
1973; Isensee and Jones, 1975).
7.2.2 Occupational Use and Exposure
Pentachlorophenol, both as a free phenol and as a sodium
salt, has been used as a wood preservative, an herbicide, a
fungicide, and a molluscicide. Use as a wood preservative in
recent years has consumed many times more pentachlorophenol than
all of the other uses. In fact, the use of pentachlorophenol or
sodium pentachlorophenate as an herbicide or a fungicide has
markedly declined in recent years as other chemicals have
replaced them.
In the United States pentachlorophenol, in an appropriate
solvent, has been the principal form used in wood preservation.
There are limited uses of the sodium pentachlorophenate for
prevention of the development of "blue mold." However, in some
countries, e.g., Indonesia, sodium pentachlorophenate is the
principal form in which this preservative is used.
There are two principal methods by which pentachlorophenol
may be applied for wood preservation (Arsenault, 1976),
pressure treatment or direct application of a solution of penta-
chlorophenol by painting, dipping or spraying. For the most
part the last three methods are employed by the individual while
the pressure treatment is used by commercial treatment plants.
Another commercial treatment is the thermal process (hot and
cold bath/submersion) which is used to introduce PCP into wood
(Ochrymowych, 1978).
In the pressure treatment with pentachlorohenol, the
phenol, in appropriate solvent, is applied to the pole or lumber
in a pressure retort at somewhat elevated temperatures. The
pressure treatment may be preceeded by a vacuum to increase
penetration, and it may be followed by a flash vacuum to reduce
surface deposits. Occupational exposure of humans, in this case,
may occur during preparation of the treatment solution or when
the retort is opened following treatment and the system is still
hot. Relatively lower levels of exposure would be expected in
handling the treated wood. The greatest exposure comes to the
worker in the immediate area of the treatment operation, whether
by dip, spray, or pressure treatment. In most of these
instances unless there is direct contact with the treatment
mixture or treated materials, the principal route of exposure
appears to be respiratory. This is in contrast to the
experience in Indonesia where the worker handles the freshly
dipped lumber or in herbicide treatment where there may be
direct dermal exposure.
82
-------
7.2.3 Environmental Transport and Exposure
Pentachlorophenol has been found in a number of
different environmental samples (Kutz et al. , 1976), e.g.,
house dust, air, water, and in the urine (Bevenue et al. ,
1972) of presumably non-exposed humans. This would appear
to indicate a rather high environmental mobility for penta-
chlorophenol. However, it must be remembered that
pentachlorophenol may be generated in chlorination of water
and that there is a residual background found upon analyses
of soil that gives analytical results similar to PCP.
However, based on the properties of pentachlorophenol,
namely that of vapor pressure and rate, of volatilization,
measurable quantities would be expected to escape into the
air either from the chemical's own surface or from poorly
adsorbing surfaces to which it had been applied. But based
on pentachlorophenol's propensity for adsorption, one would
expect that a substantial amount of this vaporized material
would be found adsorbed to particulates in air. Another
route of transport to air would be the erosion of
contaminated dust particles.
On the other hand, the chlorodioxins and chlorodi-
benzofurans that occur in pentachlorophenol, having much
lower rates of volatilization, would not be expected to be
found as frequently in air samples. Again, because of the
propensity for adsorption and the low water solubility
(about 3 ppt for OCDD; Arsenault, 1976) one would not
expect to find a great deal of these materials in water. As
indicated earlier, the relative vapor pressures and rate of
evaporation of pentachlorophenol, chlorodioxins and
dibenzofurans would perhaps account for the findings of the
Swedish workers (Levin et al., 1976). Here it appeared
that the ratio of chlorodioxins and chlorodibenzofurans to
pentachlorophenol in wood increased appreciably over the
ratio found in the original treatment solution. It seems
that a reasonable explanation would be the probable greater
loss of pentachlorophenol through vaporization from the
sawdust in contrast to the other two types of chemicals.
Though pentachlorophenol and its contaminants are
probably transported by air and water (probably in the
adsorbed state), their biological activity is probably much
reduced by adsorption, thus attenuating the effect of
exposure. It has been found, for example, that penta-
chlorophenol adsorbed on sediment found in water had low
activity so far as control of snails is concerned (Strufe,
1968). It is likely that the adsorptions of the chloro-
dioxins and chlorodibenzofurans also result in a reduction
of their biological availability.
83
-------
Breakdown is another factor in reducing the concen-
tration and biological effects on these chemicals in
transport.
7.2.4 Food and Feed
PCP is a powerful herbicide, and its intentional use
around food crops would be expected to be negligible.
However, PCP is used as a desiccant on seed alfalfa and seed
clover, and sodium PCP is used in dilute aqueous solution
as a postharvest fungicidal dip. These are considered as
non-food uses, and no tolerance has been established,
although feeding treated forage or threshings to livestock
is not permitted in the United States.
Measurement of total diet residues (FDA Market Basket
Survey) has shown occasional PCP contamination (for example,
nine of 30 composite samples showed 0.01-0.02 ppm of PCP in
1972-3; two dairy products, one legume vegetable, and six of
sugar) (Johnson and Manske, 1976). OCDD and HCDD have not
been reported in food, although Firestone (1976) reported the
presence of dioxins in commercial and "edible" packages of
gelatin. The presence of dioxins (chick edema factors) in
food grade oleic acid and oleic acid derivatives, e.g.,
glyceryl monooleate and a food emulsifier, prompted FDA to
issue a food additive regulation in 1960 (Firestone, 1973).
Chlorinated anisoles, originating in henhouse litter, have
been detected in chicken meat (0.02-0.08 ppm) and have caused
a musty taste (Curtis et al., 1972). PCP was reported to
occur at low ppb levels in fish caught in open water not
expected to contain appreciable levels of PCP (Zitko et al. ,
1974).
7.2.5 Biological Uptake and Concentration
Higher plants do not absorb appreciable amounts of PCP
or TCDD from soil (Miller and Aboul-Ela, 1969; Isensee and
Jones, 1971), and administration of these compounds directly
to leaves resulted in retention rather than translocation.
Algae, however, rapidly absorbed and concentrated TCDD about
10,000 fold from water (Isensee and Jones, 1975), although
they metabolized rather than concentrated PCP (Lu and
Metcalf, 1975) .
Rodents excreted PCP partly unchanged, partly as
glucosonide conjugate, and partly as tetrachlorohydro-
quinone and its conjugates (Jakobson and Yllner, 1971;
Ahlborg et al., 1974). Tetrachlorohydroquinone also was
detected in the urine of human workers occupationally
84
-------
exposed to PCP (Ahlborg et al. , 1974). However, the rhesus
monkey excreted PCP more slowly, and apparently only as
free PCP, with a half-life of about 40 hours in the male
and 90 hours in the female (Braun and Sauerhoff, 1976).
There appear to be no data on organ accumulation of PCP
during chronic exposure, but recovery of PCP and its
conjugates from urine and feces certainly is not quanti-
tative; for example, about 11% of a 10 mg/kg dose of PCP
was still retained by the monkey after 360 hours (1% in
liver, 7% in intestines, and 3% in other organs) (Braun and
Sauerhoff, 1976).
Animals in a model aquatic ecosystem concentrated PCP
as much as 300-fold during 48 hours of continuous exposure
(Lu and Metcalf, 1975), although up to 74% of the applied
dose was metabolized in that period. Fish accumulated the
most PCP after 120 hours of exposure to 0.1 ppm of PCP.
Fish had concentrated it 1000-fold, primarily in the gall-
bladder; return to clean water caused an initially rapid
clearance, mostly in conjugated form. Eventually up to 30%
of the original PCP body burden was retained (Kobayashi and
Akitake, 1975).
Surprisingly, no data were available on the biocon-
centration of dioxins or dibenzofurans in higher animals
during chronic exposure. After a single oral dose of
50 ug/kg, the rat cleared TCDD with a half-life of 17 +_ 6
days (Piper et al., 1973). Retention was primarily in the
liver and secondarily in the fat; the liver still contained
47% of the initial dose after three days and 11% after 21
days. Body burden of TCDD was only determined to 21 days,
at which time it still represented 40% of initial dose;
there is no indication of what terminal residue eventually
might exist, if any. No metabolism of dioxins was evident.
Bioconcentration of TCDD in aquatic model ecosystems
was reported by Matsumura and Benezet (1973) and Isensee
and Jones (1975). Bioconcentration was proportional to the
amount of TCDD in the water; the bioconcentration factor of
approximately 10 in the species included and was rather
independent of the aqueous concentration. Attempts to
detect TCDD and other dioxins in samples from terminal
predators in the environment (gull eggs, eagle fat, and
sea-lion blubber) were unsuccessful, although the
analytical sensitivity was limited to the ppb range
(Woolson et al., 1973; Bowes et al., 1973).
85
-------
While the potential exists for limited bioconcentration of
PGP from food and the environment, its rather effective
metabolism by higher and lower animals suggests that the
effect may not be pronounced. On the other hand, TCDD shows
a bioconcentration potential (104) roughly similar to
that of the more inert chlorinated hydrocarbons (10 ).
7.2.6 Sources of Exposure
Table 7.23 lists major registered uses of PCP.
From these, it is possible to determine a variety of
potential sources of occupational exposure (Table 7.24), but
in only a few instances (primarily in wood treatment
industries) has the exposure of workers been analyzed
(Klemmer, 1972; Ahlborg et al., 1974; and Wyllie et al.,
1975, are typical).
The widespread use of PCP in these applications
likewise provides increasing opportunities for incidental
exposure of the public to PCP and its impurities in the
home, business, and outdoor environment. Table 7.25 lists
a few of the more obvious possibilities. Such instances as
the detection of ppb levels of PCP in rainfall over a
remote island (Bevenue et al., 1972), in freshwater and
marine fish caught in areas remote from direct PCP dis-
charge .(Zitko et al., 1974), and in the urine of random
samples of human populations not exposed occupationally
suggests a continual low-level background of environmental
PCP which requires further investigation.
Table 7.23
Major Registered Uses of PCP
Herbicide and desiccant for forage seed crops
Insecticide for beehives, seed flats, greenhouse use.
Microbiostat for commercial and industrial water cooling
Postharvest wash for fruit
Microbiocide for burlap, canvas, cotton, rope, and twine
Microbiocide for leather
Microbiocide and insecticide for wood treatment
Preservative for oil- and water-based paint
Slime control for pulp and paper
Microbiocide for petroleum drilling mud and flood water
Fumigant for shipping-van interiors
Preservative for hardboard and particle board
Herbicide for non-food vegetation control
86
-------
Table 7.24
Some Potential Sources of Occupational Exposure
to PCP and PCP Impurities
Manufacture and shipping of industrial chlorophenols
Sawmills
Wood-treatment plants
Carpentry and other lumber and wood working
Termite control
Agricultural pesticide application
Greenhouses
Industrial cooling towers and evaporative condensers
Treatment and handling of burlap, canvas, rope, leather
Paper manufacture
Petroleum drilling
Paint manufacture and use
Telephone and electrical line work
Table 7.25
Some Potential Sources of Incidental Exposure
to PCP and PCP Impurities
Smoke from sawmills and burning scrap lumber
Sawdust (fuel, floor covering, particle board, etc.)
Vapor from treated lumber and plywood
Home treatment of lumber for termite control
Burlap, canvas, and rope
Leather products
Paper products
Contact with paint and painted surfaces
Uses of utility and structural poles and railroad ties
Ornamental wood-chips
Dairy products, sugar products, and fish
87
-------
7.3 References
Ahling, B. and L. Johansson (1977). Combustion experi-
ments using pentachlorophenol on a pilot scale
and full-scale. Chemosphere jj (7) : 425.
Ahlborg, V.G., J.E. Lindgren, and M. Mercier (1974).
Metabolism of pentachlorphenol. Arch. Toxicol.
Z2i 271.
American Wood Preservers Institute (1977) Pentachloro-
phenol—A Wood Preservative. Memorandum for the
Office of Pesticide Programs, EPA, McLean, Virginia,
p. 40.
Argauer, R.J. (1968). Rapid procedure for the chloro-
acetylation of microgram quantities of phenols
and detection by electron-capture gas chromato-
graphy. Anal. Chem. 40; 122.
Arsenault, R.D. (1976). Pentachlorophenols and contained
chlorinated dibenzodioxins in the environment.
Proc. Am. Wood Preserv. Assoc. 72; 1.
Barthel, W.F., et al. (1969). Determination of penta-
chlorophenol in blood, urine, tissue, and clothing.
J. Assoc. Offic. Anal. Chem. 52; 294.
Revenue, A., J.N. Ogata, and J.W. Hyline (1972). Organo-
chlorine pesticides in rainwater, Oahu, Hawaii,
1971-1972. B_._ Env. Cont. Tox. 8_: 238.
Bevenue, A., and H. Beckman (1967). Pentachlorophenol:
A discussion of its properties and its occurrence
as residue in human and animal tissues, Residue
Reviews 19; 984.
Blaser, W.W., et al. (1976). Determination of chlorina-
ted dibenzo-p-dioxins in pentachlorophenol by gas
chromatography-mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem.
j4£: 984.
Boer, P.P., et al. (1973). X-ray diffraction studies
of chlorTnated dibenzo-p-dioxins, In: Chloro-
dioxins—Origin and Fate. Adv. Chem. Series 120;
14.
88
-------
Bowes, G.W., et al. (1973). The search for chlorinated
dibenzofurans and chlorinated dibenzodioxins in
wildlife populations showing elevated levels of
embryonic death. Env. Health Perspect. j5:191.
Braun, W.J., and M.W. Sauerhoff (1976). The pharma-
cokinetic profile of pentachlorophenol in monkeys.
Tox. Appl Pharm. 38;525.
British Crop Protection Council (1971). Pesticide Manual,
2nd edition. H. Martin (ed.), Worcester, England
P. 359.
Britton, E.G., and F.N. Alquist (1940). Pentachlorophenol.
U.S. Patent 2,176,417 (October 17, 1940), Chem.
Abstr. 34; 1038.
Buser, H.-R (1975a). Analysis of polychlorinated dibenzo-
p-dioxins and dibenzofurans in chlorinated phenols
by mass fragmentography. J. Chromatog. 107;295.
Buser, H.-R (1975b). Polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins.
separation and identification of isomers by gas
chromatography-mass spectrometry. J.. Chromatog.
L14_:95.
Buser, H.-R. (1976). Higher resolution gas chromatography
of polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and dibenzo-
furans. Anal. Chem. 48:1553.
Buser, H.-R. and H.P. Booshardt (1976). Determination of
polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and dibenzofurans
in commercial PCP's by combined gas chromatography-
mass spectrometry. J. of the ADAC, 59(3);562-569.
Buu-Hoi, N.P., et al. (1971). Preparation, properties, and
identification of "dioxin" (2,3,7,8-tetrachloro-
dibenzodioxin) in the pyrolyzate of defoliants based
on 2,4,5-trichlorophenoxy acetic acid and its esters
and contaminated vegetation. Compt. Rend. Acad.
Sci. Paris 273D;708.
Cantrell, J.S., N.C. Webb, and A.J. Mabis (1969). The
identification and crystal structure of a hydroperi-
cardium-producing factor: 1,2,3,7,8,9- hexachloro-
dibenzo-p-dioxinf Acta Crystallogr. B25;150-156.
Chang, W.-H. (1962). Tetrachloro-o-benzoquinone by direct
oxidation of pentachlorophenol. J. Org. Chem. 27:
2921.
89
-------
Choi, J. and S. Aomine (1974). Adsorption of pentachloro-
phenol by soils. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. Tokyo 20;
135.
Crosby, D.G., K.W. Moilanen, and A.S. Wong (1973).
Environmental generation and degradation of diben-
zodioxins and dibenzofurans. Environ. Health
Perspec. J5:259.
Crosby, D.G., et al. (1971). Photodecomposition of
chlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins. Science 173: 748.
Crosby, D.G., and N. Hamadmad (1971). The photoreduction
of pentachlorobenzenes. J. Agr. Food Chem. 19:1171.
Crosby, D.G., and A.S. Wong (1976). Photochemical gen-
eration of chlorinated dioxins. Chemosphere j>:327.
Crosby, D.G., and A.S. Wong (1977). Environmental degrad-
ation of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD).
Science 195:1337.
Crummett, W. and R.H. Stehl (1973). Determination of
chlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and dibenzofurans
in various materials. Environ. Health Perspect.
Crummett, W.B. (1975). Memo of 7/28/75 to R. Ross, EPA Office
of Pesticide Programs.
Curtis, R.F., e_t al. (1972) 2,3,4,6-tetrachloroanisole
association with musty taint in chickens and micro-
biological formation. Nature 235:223.
Denivelle, L. and R. Fort (1954) Hexachloro-cyclohexa-
diene-1,5-one-3 from pentachlorophenyl pseudohy-
pochlorite, Compt. Rend. Acad. Sci. Paris 238:124.
Doedens, J. D. (1964). Chlorophenols. In: Kirk-Othmer
Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology, 2nd edition
(A. Standen, ed.) Interscience Publishers, J. Wiley
& Sons, New York, pp. 336.
Dow Chemical Company (1971). Private communication.
Dow Chemical Company (1973). Private communication.
90
-------
Farrington, D.S. and J.W. Munday (1976). Determination
of trace amounts of chlorophenols by gas-liquid
chromatography. Analyst 101;639.
Firestone, D. (1977). Report on oils and fats. £. Assoc.
Offic. Anal. Chem. 60;354.
Firestone, D. (1973). Ethology of chick edema disease.
Environ. Health Perspect. _5:59.
Firestone, D. (1976). Determination of polychlorodibenzo-
p-dioxins and polychlorodibenzofurans in commercial
gelatins by gas-liquid chromatography. J. Agric.
Food Chem. 25^:1274. ~~
Firestone, D., et al. (1972). Determination of polychloro-
dibenzo-p-dioxins and related compounds in commercial
chlorophenols. J. Assoc. Offie. Anal. Chem. 55;85.
Firestone, D., M. Clower, A.P. Borsetti, R.H. Teske, and
P.E. Long (1978). Polychlorodibenzo-p-dioxin and PCP
residues in milk and blood of cows fed commercial
PCP. Submitted to J. Agric. Food Chem.
Fountaine, J.E., P.B. Willis (1973). Chromatographic
separation of phenols using an acrylic resin. J.
Chromatog. 79;107.
Fountaine, J.E., P.B. Joshipura, and P.N. Keliher (1975).
Determination of pentachlorophenol by ultraviolet
ratio spectrophotometry. Anal. Chem. 47 ;157.
Fritz, J.S. and R.B. Willis (1973). Chromatographic
separation of phenols using an acrylic resin.
J. Chromatog. 79:107.
Gab, S., e_t al. (1975). Photomineralization of certain
aromatic xenobiotica. Chemosphere 4;251.
Goldstein, J.A., M. Friesen, R.E. Linder, P. Hickman,
J. R. Hass, and H. Bergman (1977). Effects of PCP on
hepatic drug-metabolizing enzymes and porphyria
related to contamination with chlorinated dibenzo-
p-dioxins and dibenzofurans. Biochem. Pharmacol. 26:
1549.
Gray, A.P., S.P. Cepa, and J.S. Cantrell (1975). Inter-
vention of the Smiles rearrangement in synthesis
of dibenzo-p-dioxins 1,2,3,6,7,8- and 1,2,3,7,8,
9-hexachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (HCDD). Tetrahedron
Letters 33:2873.
91
-------
Gray, A.P., V.M. Dipinto, and I.J. Solomon (1976).
Synthesis of specific polychlorinated dibenzo-
furans. J. Org. Chem. 41:2428.
Hamaker, J.W. (1975). In: Environmental Dynamics of
Pesticides, (R. Haque and V.H. Freed, eds.). Plenum
Press, New York.
Haque, R., and V.H. Freed (1974). Residue Reviews 52;89.
Hartley, F.S. (1969). In: Adv. Chem. Series 86:115.
Hass, J.R. (1977). Private communication.
Helling, C.S., e_t al. (1973). J. Env. Qual. _2:171.
Hunt, D.F., T.M. Harvey, and J.W. Russell (1975). Oxygen
as a reagent gas for the analysis of 2,3,7,8-tetra-
chlorodibenzo-p-dioxin by negative ion chemical
ionization mass spectrometry. J_. Chem. Soc. Chem.
Comm. 151.
Hutzinger, e_t _al. (1973). Photochemical degradation of
di- and octachlorodibenzofuran. Environ. Health
Perspect. _5:267.
Ide, A., et al. (1972). Decomposition of pentachloro-
phenoT in a paddy soil. Agric. Biol. Chem. 36;1937.
Isensee, A.R., and G.E. Jones (1975). Distribution of
2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dixon (TCDD) in aquatic
model ecosystem. Environ Sci. Technol. j):669.
Isensee, A.R., and G.E. Jones (1971). Absorption and
translocation of root and foliage applied 2,4-
dichlorophenol, 2,7-dichlorodibenzo-p-dioxin, and
2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin. J Agr. Food
Chem. ,1£:1210.
Jakobson, I., and Yllner (1971). Metabolism of 14C-
pentachlorophenol in the mouse. Acta Pharm. Toxicol.
_29:513.
Jensen, S. and L. Renberg (1972). Contaminants in penta-
chlorophenol: chlorinated dioxins and predioxins
(chlorinated hydroxy-diphenylethers), Ambio 1:62.
Jensen, S. and L. Renberg (1973). Chlorinated dimers
present in several technical chlorophenols used
as fungicides. Environ. Health Perspect. _5:37.
Kearney, P.C., e_t al. (1973). In: Chlorodioxins—Origin
and Fate (E.H. Blair, ed.). ACS Series 120.
92
-------
Kearney, P.C., et. _al. (1973). Environ. Health Perspect.
_5:273.
Kearney, P.C. e± a±. (1972). Environ. Sci. Technol. 6^:1017.
Kende, A.S., et al^ (1974). Regiospecific synthesis and
NMR spectroscopy of toxic polyhalodibenzo-p-dioxins
and dibenzofurans. Paper presented, 167th Ann.
Mtg. Am. Chem. Soc. March 31, 1974 (Abstract ORGN
130) .
Kim, P., et al. (1975). Photochemical dechlorination
of chlorTnated dibenzo-p-dioxins. Paper presented,
1st Chemical Congress of North America, November 30-
December 5, 1975, Mexico City.
Kobayashi, K. and H. Akitake (1975). Studies on the
metabolism of chlorophenols in fish-I. Absorption
and excretion of PCP by goldfish. Bull. Jap. Soc.
Sci. Fish. 41(1);87-92.
Kulka, M. (1961). Octahalogenodibenzo-p-dioxins. Can.
J. Chem. 3_2:1973.
Kutz, F. et al. (1976). In: Air Pollution by Pesticides
and Agricultural Processes (R. Lee, ed.) . Chapter 4,
CRC Press.
Kuwatsuka, S. (1972). Degradation of several herbicides
in soils under different conditions. In: Environmental
Toxicology of Pesticides (F. Matsumara, G.M. Boush,
and T. Misato, eds.). Academic Press, New York, p. 385,
Langer, H.G. , e_t al. (1973). Thermal chemistry in
chlorinated phenols, In: Chlorodioxins—Origin and
Fate. ACS Series 120, Washington, D.C. p. 26.
Leo, £t al. (1971). Chemical Reviews 71:525.
Levin, J. ejt al. (1976) . Scan. J_._ Work Env. Health 2:11.
Lu, P.-Y and R.L. Metcalf (1975). Environmental fate and
biodegradability of benzene derivatives as studied
in a model aquatic ecosystem. Environ. Health
Perspect. 10;269.
Melnikov (1971). Residue Reviews 36.
Matsumura, F. and H.J. Benezet (1973). Studies on the
bioaccumulation and microbial degradation of 2,3,
7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin. Environ. Health
Perspect. 5:253.
93
-------
McConnell, E.E., J.A. Moore, J. Baseman and M. Harris
(1978). The comparative toxicity of chlorinated
dibenzo-p-dioxins isomers in mice and guinea
pigs. Toxicol. Ajppl. Pharmacol. In press.
Miller, C.S. and M.M. Aboul-Ela (1969). Fate of penta-
chlorophenol in cotton. £. agr . Food Chem. 17;1244.
Munakata, K. and M. Kuwahara (1969). Photochemical
degradation products of PCP. Residue Reviews, 25;13-23,
Nilsson, C.-A. and L. Renberg (1974) . Further studies on
impurities in chlorophenols. J Chromatogr. 89 ;325.
Ochrymowych, J. , Western Electric (1978). Personal
commun i ca t i on .
Page, S.W. (1976). Synthesis of chlorinated dibenzofurans,
Paper presented at the 172nd Am. Chem. Soc. Mtg.
San Francisco, California, August 30- September
3, 1976 (Abstract ORGN 63).
Pfeiffer, C.D. (1976). Determination of chlorinated di-
benzo-p-dioxins in pentachlorophenol by liquid chroma-
tography. J^ Chroma tog. Sci. 14; 386.
Pierce, R.H. (1978). Fate and impact of PCP in a fresh-
water ecosystem. U.S. EPA, 600/3-78-063, pp 1-62.
Piper, W.N. , J.Q. Rose, and P.J. Gehring (1973). Excre-
tion and tissue distribution of 2, 3, 7,8-tetrachloro-
dibenzo-p-dioxin in the rat. Env. Health Perspect.
_5:241.
Plimmer, J.R., ejt al . (1973). Photochemistry of dibenzo-
p-dioxins. In: Chlorodioxins: Origin and Fate. ASC
Services 120, pp. 44-54.
Plimmer, J. R. , and U.I. Klingebiel (1971). Riboflavin
photosensitized oxidation of 2,4-dichlorophenol :
assessment of possible chlorinated dioxin formation.
Science 174 ;407.
Plimmer, J.R. (1973). Technical pentachlorophenol: origin
and analysis of base-insoluble contaminants. Environ.
Health Perspect. J5:41.
Pohland, A.E. and G.C. Yang (1972). J. Agric. Food Chem.
Pohland, A.E., G.C. Yang, and N. Brown (1973). Analytical
and confirmative techniques for dibenzo-p-dioxins
based upon their cation radicals. Environ. Health
Perspect. 5:9.
94
-------
Poland, A. and E. Glover (1976). Stereospecif ic high
affinity binding of 2, 3, 7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-
p-dioxins by hepatic cytosol. J. Biol. Chem.
Rappe, C., and C. A. Nilsson (1972). An artifact in the
gas chromatographic determination of impurities
in pentachlorophenol. J. Chromatogr . 67;247.
Renberg, L. (1974) . Ion exchange technique for the
determination of chlorinated phenols and phenoxy
acids in organic tissue. Soil ^ Water Anal. Chem.
46:459.
Rudling, L. (1970). Determination of pentachlorophenol in
organic tissues and water. Water Research ^:533.
Sandermann, W., H. Stockmann, and R. Casten (1957).
Pyrolysis of pentachlorophenol. Chem. Ber . 90;
690.
Sittig, M. (1969). Organic Chemical Process Encyclopedia.
2nd edition. Noyes Development Corp., Park Ridge,
New Jersey, pp. 506.
Stehl, R.H., £t a_l. (1973). The stability of pentachloro-
phenol and chlorinated dioxins to sunlight, heat,
and combustion. In: Chlorodioxins—Origin and
Fate. ACS Series 120, pp. 119-125.
Stehl, R.H., and W.B. Crummett (1977). Letter of 2/15/77
to T.D. Bath.
Stehl, R.H., and L.L. Lamparski (1977). Combustion of
several 2,4,5-trichlorophenoxy compounds: forma-
tion of 2, 3,7,8-tetrachloro-dibenzo-p-dioxin.
Science 197:1008.
Strufe, R. (1968). Residue Reviews 24:79.
Sundstrom, G. , and 0. Hutzinger (1976). The synthesis of
chlorinated diphenyl ethers. Chemo sphere _5:305.
Svec, P. and V. Kubelka (1975). Anomalous behavior of
polychloro alicyclic ketones in gas chromatography
and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. J_. Anal .
Chem. 277:113.
Villanueva, E.G., £t al. (1975). A comparison of analytical
methods for chlorodibenzo-p-dioxins in pentachloro-
phenol. J. Agric. Food Chem. 23:1089.
95
-------
Vogel, S.H., et al. (1976). Determination of chlorinated
dibenzo-p-dlo"xins in pentachlorophenol. Analytical
Methods Review, Report of December 1976.
Vogel, S.H. (1977). Communication of 3/7/77 to T. Atkeson
(edited slides and comments used in discussion
with Science Advisory Board, 3/3/77).
Woolson, E.A., et al. (1973). Dioxin residues in Lakeland
sand and baTd eagle samples. Adv. Chem. Series 120;
112.
Woolson, E.A., R.F. Thomas, and P.D.J. Ensor (1972)
Survey of polychlorodibenzo-p-dioxin content in
selected pesticides. J. Agr. Food Chem. 20;351.
Wong, A.S. (1977). The environmental degradation of penta-
chlorophenol. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Calfornia
(Davis).
Wyllie, J.A., et al. (1975). Exposure and contamination
of the air ancl employees of a pentachlorophenol
plant, Idaho-1972. Pestic. Monit. J. 2:150.
Yang, G.C., and A.E., Pohland (1973). Cation radicals of
chlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins. In: Chlorodioxins—
Origin and Fate. ACS Series 120, pp. 33.
Zabik, M.J., R.A. Leavitt, and G.C.C. Su (1976). Photo-
chemistry of bioactive compounds. A review of
pesticides photochemistry. In: Annual Review of
Entomology 21;61.
Zitko, V., O. Hutzinger, and P.M.K. Choi (1974). Deter-
mination of pentachlorophenol and chlorobiphenyls
in biological samples. B_. Env. Cont. Tox. 12:649.
96
-------
8. APPENDIX D
8.1 Agenda of April 3-4, 1978 Meeting of
EHAC 100
8.2 Testimony of Interested Parties
8.2.1 Mr. Dennis Lindsay (AWPI) 103
8.2.2 Mr. Dennis Lindsay (VMI) 107
8.2.3 Mr. Robert Arsenault (Koppers) 109
8.2.4 Dr. Gary A. van Gelder 129
8.2.5 Mr. Fred Shelton (Reichhold) 140
8.2.6 Dr. Robert L. Johnson (Dow).. 153
8.3 Comments of Interested Parties
8.3.1 Mr. Paul. E. des Rosiers (EPA)... 158
8.3.2 Dr. Gary A. van Gelder 161
8.3.3 Dr. Robert L. Johnson (Dow) 165
97
-------
8.1 Agenda of Environmental Health Advisory Committee
Meeting of April 3-4, 1978.
-------
FINAL
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
SCIENCE ADVISORY BOARD
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH ADVISORY COMMITTEE
Conference Room A (Room 1112)
Crystal Mall Building No. 2
Arlington, Virginia
April 3-4, 1973
AGENDA
Monday, April 3, 1973
9:00 a.m. 1. Introductions and Opening Remarks Dr. Whittenberger
2. Draft Report of Study Group on Pentachlorophenol
Contaminants TDraft dated March 1978)
- Introductory Remarks Dr. Murphy
9:30 a.m. 3. Statements by Members of the Public
- Mr. Dennis Lindsay, Chairman, PCP Committee
American Wood Preservers Institute
- Mr. Robert Arsenault, Director, New Product Development
Koppers Company
- Mr. Dennis Lindsay, Technical Services
Vulcan Materials Company
- Dr. Gary A. van Gelder, Veterinary Toxicologist,
College of Veterinary Medicine
University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri
- Mr. Fred Shelton, Vice President, Science and Technology
Reichhold Chemicals
- Dr. Robert L. Johnson, Senior Research Analyst
Dow Chemical Company
11:00 a.m. ***BREAK***
100
-------
April 3. 1978
11:15 a.m. 4.
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH ADVISORY COMMITTEE
April 3-4, 1978
AGENDA
(Continued)
Comments and Discussion
by Members of Committee and Study Group
Dr. Whittenberger
***
12:30 p.m. ***LUNCH
1:30 p.m. 5. Comments and Discussion (Cont'd) and
Development of Committee Recommendations
3:00 p.m. 6. Informational Items
- Publication of
"Noise - A Health Problem"
- Status of Benzene Assessment Reports
3:30 p.m. 7. Concluding Remarks
Dr. Whittenberger
Mr. Marrazzo
Dr. Saz
Dr. Whittenberflgr
***RECESS***
Agenda Notes:
Dr. James L. Whittenberger, Professor of Physiology, James Stevens Simmons
Professor of Public Health, School of Public Health, Harvard University,
Boston, Massachusetts
Dr. Sheldon D. Murphy, Professor of Toxicology, Department of Pharmacology,
University of Texas Medical School at Houston, Houston, Texas
Mr. Rudy Marrazzo, Science Advisor, Office of Noise Abatement and Control ,
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D. C.
Dr. Arthur K. Saz, Criteria Development and Special Studies Division,
Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Washington, D. C.
101
-------
8.2 Testimony of Interested Parties
102'
-------
8.2.1 SAB Meeting - April 3, 1978
Statement as AWPI Committee Chairman
My name is Dennis Lindsay. I am employed by Vulcan
Materials Company, a pentachlorophenol producer. The remarks
I wish to make now are on the behalf of the American Wood
Preservers' Institute, also known as AWPI. Approximately three
years ago the wood preserving industry organized an Environmental
Programs Task Group within the AWPI, a pre-existing trade associa-
tion. The purpose and goal of the task group was and still is
to make possible the survival of the wood preserving industry
during this time of extensive governmental regulation. We monitor
the governmental regulatory agencies and comment when appropriate
upon proposed regulation. We frequently offer our assistance
in helping the agencies understand what it is they are attempting
to regulate. Our task group chairman appoints subcommitties and
assigns to them various responsibilities.
I am Chairman of EPTG subcommittee #6, on pentachlorophenol
which was formed about two years ago with the primary purpose
being to defend penta during the anticipated RPAR process and
eventually get it reregistered under FIFRA.
Our subcommittee appeared before your study group on penta
contaminants at a meeting they held 13 months ago today. We
made comments and supplied information which I trust was somewhat
useful to them. Your study group has worked diligently as
evidenced by their draft report. It is by far the most
-------
comprehensive document to date and does an excellent job of
explaining the many facets of this complex problem.
Our subcommittee has also been very active during these
past 13 months, both as a group and as individual companies.
I wish to point out some of our activities and inform you of
certain facts.
/
First of all I wish to call to your attention the fact
that we, as penta producers, are one less in number than we
were a year ago. In the fall of 1970, when the U.S. Department
of Agriculture first expressed concern about the presence of
chloro-dioxins in some "economic poisons", that now missing
producer was the greatest among us. Their production and sales.
j-f ptnJ'Q'
Exceeded that of any other producer.
Thirteen months ago, I reported to your study committee
that we had been negotiating with the Pacific Bio-Medical Research
Center at the University of Hawaii concerning the retrieval and
statistical analysis of data generated in a long term project
known as the Community Studies on Pesticides. This study deals
QC.t Kjgg-/*''** * (
with chronic/sexposure to technical penta. We did fund that project,
We had hoped for an earlier report; however, it is due within
the next two or three months. We will make it available to
your study group and would hope that they at least consider the
report before writing their final draft and recommendations.
This committee has also made possible the generation of
other data relevant to the charge of your study group. Most of
the work done during the past year by Dr. Gary Van Gelder,
University of Missouri, concerning Michigan dairy herds was funded
104
-------
by this committee. It was largely Dr. Van Gelder's work which
led the hearing officer, Dr. Gilbert H. Wise, D.V.M. to conclude:
"The evidence, while not removing all possibility of
hazard, does not support a finding of any measurable
magnitude of risk or likelihood of harm to the human
food chain from exposure of food animals to CDD in
technical penta." (Page 16 of hearing officer's report).
I have attached a copy of Dr. Wise's full report and findings
for your information. The underlining and notations are my own.
Next, I would like to call your attention to the current
draft report. Under in, Section 2, "Toxicology of Chlorinated
Dioxins and Dibenzofurans"; page 5, the last sentence states,
"Controlled dosing experiments, recently initiated,
may help answer questions raised by the Michigan field
studies concerning the pharmacokinetics and toxicity
of PCP and its contaminants in cattle."
It is hoped that that report, when completed, would also
be considered by your study group prior to their reaching a
conclusion and recommendation.
In addition, we are aware of a study by Dr, Firestone in
which he fed technical penta to lactating cows. Any information
relevant to this problem should be considered prior to a final
report by this committee.
Our committee is currently considering the funding of a
180-day calf feeding study using varying doses of different kinds
of pentachlorophenol which would be done by Dr. Van Gelder.
105
-------
We are presently waiting upon the results of the Firestone
and Moore studies to help us decide what questions remain
unanswered.
At the request of AWPI, the American Wood Preservers'
Association, AWPA, the standards writing organization for our
industry, has appointed a special committee to establish
standards for treating wood intended for use in housing food
producing animals. My point is to show you that we are attempting
to act responsibly in dealing with these problems.
3/28/78
-------
SAB Meeting - April 3, 1978
Statement as VMC Representative
Gentlemen, I am changing hats now. The remarks I will
make from here on are as a representative of Vulcan Materials
Company.
I would first like to direct your attention to the draft
report, I, page 4. The last sentence of the top paragraph reads
as follows:
"Of course, the production of this more purified
product entails increased production costs, and some
representatives of industry felt this would result
in a product which may be more difficult to handle."
That statement is not strong enough. I am convinced that
this would result in a product which is more difficult to handle.
I know of three separate cases where it was attempted to use
Dowicide EC-7 in conventional bulk handling systems. All were
considered failures in the eyes of the customer, and one resulted
in considerable damage to the equipment.
Dow has apparently acknowledged this fact, since they
recently announced that they will now produce penta only in the
block form. That action has caused a large number of smaller
consumers of penta who have been Dow customers to come to the
other producers for a source. They (the smaller consumers)
cannot afford to purchase the block dissolving equipment.
Vulcan introduced bulk handling of penta ten years ago, and
we believe it to be unequaled in convenience, flexibility and
107
-------
reducing exposure to plant personnel. Blocks may be a
useful manner of handling penta, but blocks or bulk handling
simply will not serve the purpose of everyone in the industry.
Thirteen months ago our greatest concern with penta was
that of its contaminants. Today we hear concern expressed over
fetotoxicity, teratogenicity and even mutagenicity. In the
face of these concerns, it is difficult for a producer to justify
the capital expenditure in purification facilities for a product
with an environmentally doubtful future. One producer has ceased
production; and while environmental considerations were not the
underlying reasons, you can be sure that the uncertain future
for this product helped tip the scale in their decision-making
process.
I would like to propose what I believe is a common sense
solution to this problem. It is not a new idea. Others have
proposed it before, but in my opinion, it has merit.
After studying the draft report of your study group, I
conclude that sufficient scientific evidence upon which to base
a decision is lacking. Further, since technical penta has been
used for 40 years with only minor and controllable incidents,
I believe that this study group should direct their attention
to outlining the testing which would enable them to make a
decision. Such testing might be accomplished on a cooperative
basis by the chemical producers. In this way the wood treaters
would be spared the cost of different handling equipment until
such time as it was necessary, if at all.
3/30/78 >:-..
108
-------
Forest Products Division. Koppers Company, Inc.
Pittsburgh, PA 15219, Telephone 412-S3UOTOO 227-2460
8.2.3
Robert 0. Arsenault
Manager
Product Development
Architectural and
Construction Materials
Dear Mr. Linde:
April 13, 1978
Mr. Ernst Linde
Scientist Administrator
Science Advisory Board, A-101
Environmental Protection Agency
Washington, D. C. 20460
Attached is the written statement of essentially what I said at thai
SAB Meeting.
Sincerely yours,
Robert D. Arsenault
RDA/mz
enclosures
109
-------
Testimony to the EPA Science Advisory Board
Environmental Health Advisory Committee on Pentachlorophenol
April 3, 1978
My name is Robert D. Arsenault. I am Manager of Product Development,
Forest Products Group, Koppers Company, Inc. I was formerly associated
with Monsanto Company, Paper & Wood Chemicals Group, as Market
Manager for pentachlorophenol and as such I had considerable working
knowledge of pentachlorophenol chemistry and use in wood preservation.
Koppers Company uses considerable quantities of PCP in its wood treating
facilities and in formulating blended products for millwork, sapstain control
and other uses. In addition, Koppers sells PCP as a broker, formerly for
Monsanto and now for Reichhold and Vulcan.
I appreciate the opportunity to speak to the Environmental Health Advisory
Committee today. I will restrict my comments to the draft report of the
Study Group on PCP Contaminants. I will first make some general com-
ments followed by specific comments.
On the whole I feel that the study group has done an excellent job in reviewing
the current knowledge on PCP contaminants. Their conclusions concerning
the potential hazards are especially noteworthy, but these conclusions are
inconsistent with the bottom line conclusion.
For example, on page 1-5 the statement reads, "there is really very little
data on the environmental persistence and transport of the dioxin and dibenzo-
furan contaminents of pentachlorophenol". On page 1-6 the paper reads,
"The toxicological information necessary to make the evaluation of relative
hazard of purified versus standard commercial PCP is also deficient.
Pentachlorophenol itself is a toxic chemical in its own right.." On page 1-7
the paper reads, "This finding of low, but detectable, levels of chlorinated
dioxins in tissues of these animals is a matter of public health concern,
however, the biological significance of this finding is not presently known. "
And, "There is insufficient information concerning the identity and dosage
of dioxins involved to allow these observations in man to be useful in a
quantitative assessment of the relative hazard of purified PCP versus com-
mercial products containing dioxin contaminants. There are no data that
permit an estimate of the relative susceptibility of humans to systemic
effects of the dioxins and related contaminants of PCP. " "As yet, there is
no quantitative information which permits a comparison of the toxicity of
dioxin to humans versus other animals. "
110
-------
-2-
All these statements reinforce our consistent opinion that there are no
known significant hazards related to the current levels of impurities in
PCP, and there are no data to set any target level judged to be "safe".
Yet, these conclusions were the result of a review of all known data on
hazardse No such review was made of the costs associated with gaining
these unstated "benefits" from removing the impurities; yet, the state-
ment is made on page 1-4, "Of course, the production of this more
purified product entails increased production costs and some represen-
tatives of industry felt this would result in a product which may be more
difficult to handle". A thorough study of the "costs" would have shown
that not only are they huge, but the costs would include an increase in
exposure to PCP due to the product being more dusty. Also, the costs
would include disposal problems with dioxin still bottoms and difficulty
in using the purer grade in some industry solvents such as Koppers
Cellon process.
Despite all the above mentioned lack of information, the Study Group wrote
conclusion 10 which simply states that since technology is available to clean
up PCP, "it would seem prudent" to do so. This statement seems to us to
be unjustified, though it is politically expedient.
On pages II-7 and V-3-35 acknowledgement is made that some of the PCP
in the environment may come from generation of PCP by chlorinaticn of
water or creation by natural processes,, However, the implication is that
PCP in the environment, found in urine of non-exposed humans, and in
tissue comes from exposure to treated wood in the environment.
One of the problems that has arisen is that pentachlorophenol in the environ-
ment seems to be ubiquitous. It is found in samples taken from the environ-
ment, from animals, and from humans. For example, the March 1st issue
of Pesticide & Toxic Chemicals News reports that the "Environmental
Protection Agency's national human monitoring program has found in the
400 samples of human urine analyzed that nearly 85% of the samples show
'quantifiable amounts of pentachlorophenol', a constituent of many wood
preservatives and a contact herbicide". Also, the June 30, 1976 issue of
Pesticide Chemical News contained an article that stated, "hexachloroben-
zene residues have been found in 75% of mother's milk samples and 95% of
human adipose tissue samples collected in the U.S. by the EPA". Attached
is a copy of the entire text of this article. It also states that HCB contami-
nation of meat is increasing and breast fed infants, in a worst case situation,
could be exposed to HCB levels approaching those demonstrating adverse
effects in laboratory animals.
Ill
-------
-3-
Tying these two findings together in order to show that PCP and HCB are
interrelated one would only have to prove that pentachlorophenol is a metab-
olite of hexachlorobenzene, or vice-versa. Since pentachlorophenol is used
in small quantities as a wood preservative compared to hexachlorobenzene
production in the chemical industry, one would have to agree that pentachloro-
phenol could be a metabolite of hexachlorobenzene in humans, if shown in
laboratory animals. In fact, it was shown in monkeys that hexachlorobenzene
metabolized to pentachlorophenol. I am attaching a copy of a paper by Yang,
et al entitled, "Chromatographic Methods for the Analysis of Hexachloroben-
zene and Possible Metabolites in Monkey Fecal Samples".
Another paper by Engst, et al, "The Metabolism of Hexachlorobenzene in
Rats", confirmed earlier findings by Mahendale in 1975 that pentachloro-
phenol was a metabolite of hexachlorobenzene in animals. I am also
attaching a copy of a paper by Rourke, et al entitled, "Identification of
Hexachlorobenzene as a Contaminant in Laboratory Plastic Wash Bottles",
which references three papers by Yang, et al on the metabolism of hexa-
chlorobenzene in Rhesus monkeys. I have given you a copy of the paper by
Renner entitled, "2, 4, 5-trichlorophenol, A New Urinary Metabolite of
Hexachlorobenzene".
Now how does the hexachlorobenzene get in the environment? To answer
that question I am enclosing a copy of a paper written for the Hazardous
Waste Management Division of EPA entitled, "Sources, Characteristics,
and Treatment and Disposal of Industrial Waste Containing Hexachloro-
benzene". According to the paper there are 23,665 tons per year of
hexachlorobenzene containing waste materials from chlorinated solvent
production alone plus 2,650 tons of hexachlorobenzene from chlorinated
solvents which were presumably removed from the chlorinated solvents
before the sale of the solvents. It is also known that many of the chlori-
nated solvents used for dry cleaning contained traces of hexachlorobenzene
and this could be another reason why humans are exposed to hexachloro-
benzene everywhere.
Another paper which was sent to us from the Office of Toxic Substances
entitled, "Hexachlorobenzene, A Man Made Pollutant", is attached for
your information.
It is apparent also that this is not a one-way proposition. Fentachloro-
phenol could conceivably degrade to hexachlorobenzene under certain
conditions,, Dr. Donald Crosby in his paper to the EPA Science Advisory
Board, "Reactions and Environmental Fate of Pentachlorophenol and its
112
-------
-4-
Impurities", stated, "the original pyrolytic conversion of a PCP salt to
OCDD was accompanied by a large portion of hexachlorobenzene, sug-
gested to arise from decomposition of decachlorodiphenyl, but this has
not been confirmed". Hexachlorobenzene also appears to be a byproduct
of UV light degradation of pentachlorophenol on the surface of wood. It
is my impression that hexachlorobenzene contamination of the environ-
ment is caused from the hexachlorobenzene impurities in chlorinated
chemicals as well as the over 26 million tons per year of HCB containing
waste which are dumped.
Also attached are two articles which appeared in J. Environ. Sci. Health
in 1976, both covering another source of penta in the environment. The
use of lindane as an insecticide on lettuce and endives resulted in the
lindane to convert to trichlorophenol, tetrachlorophenol, pentachlorophenol,
and conjugates of tetra and pentachlorophenols. Non-polar compounds
including hexachlorobenzene were also formed. In the top soil was also
some penta. While the article calls these breakdown products metabolites
from the crop, I think it more likely that they are UV light breakdown
products.
The other article covers the metabolism of lindane in rats. Pentachloro-
phenol is shown to be one of the metabolites. Other metabolites include
2, 3, 4, 6-tetrachlorophenol, 2, 3, 5S 6-tetrachlorophenol, and 2, 4,6-tri-
chlorophenol. Minor metabolites were gamma E, 3, 4, 5, 6-pentachloro-
cyclohexene and its metabolite, tetrachlorocyclohexanol.
This work also shows other chemicals which have penta as a metabolite.
They are pentachlorobenzene and 2, 3, 4, 5, 6-pentachlorocyclohexene-(2)-
ol-(l) and gamma 2,3,4,5,6 pentachlorocyclohexene.
It is beginning to look like there are many ways for penta to end up in
the food chain, both as metabolites and as breakdown products of other
commonly used pesticides, including hexachlorobenzene and lindane.
We at Koppers feel so strongly about this issue of pentachlorophenol
being a universal contaminant "caused by use in wood preservation" that
I asked R. S. Detrick of Koppers to present a paper which appeared in
the Forest Products Journal in 1977. Attached is a copy of the paper.
It refers to many of the items which I have already discussed, but in
summary it shows that pentachlorophenol in the ppb level can be caused
from other factors than pentachlorophenol exposure.
There is another area of concern which I feel must be dealt with in the
Report. Photolysis of PCP can create OCDD and hexachlorobenzene in
113
-------
-5-
the environment. Since both of these contaminants are already present
in technical PCP, we question why take them out if they are only going to
form again from sunlight. However, they also rapidly break down in the
same sunlight.
The paper on page II-8 states that PCP photodegrades in water and various
solvents. This is covered again briefly on pages V-3-17, V-3-19, V-3-20,
V-3-22, and V-3-32. However, on page V-3-22 the Report states that
organic, hydrogen-donating solvent must be present for photolysis of
dioxins or dibenzofuran to occur. This is not true. We have demonstrated
repeatedly that photolysis and rapid degradation occurs when dioxins are
present on cellulose substrate without solvent. We have extensive infor-
mation to EPA with a letter to Mr. Edwin Johnson dated June 1, 1977 on
the degradation of PCP and OCDD by sunlight and artificial UV light. None
of these data are referenced in this report.
I am attaching a copy of that June 1st letter and also a copy of a letter
written to Dr. Donald Islib as part of the Michigan Hearing Record. These
documents show that both technical PCP and EC-7 PCP reach the same
maximum of OCDD level in micrograms per unit surface area after one
day irradiation by UV light. This maximum was then depleted as the OCDD
photodegraded and there is no difference in the rate of buildup or the rate
of breakdown between commercial PCP and EC-7 PCP. The OCDD con-
centration on the surface reached 3060 ppm on the basis of initial PCP
concentration regardless whether the initial PCP started with commercial
PCP (1600 ppm OCDD) or EC-7 PCP (60 ppm OCDD).
Hexachlorobenzene also is a degradation byproduct of photolysis of PCP.
However, HCB is also a contaminant of PCP. In fact, we found a sample
of EC-7 PCP contained approximately four times the HCB level (170 ppm)
as Monsanto's PCP (45 ppm). In wipe tests of wood utility poles exposed
to sunlight for less than one week, poles treated with EC-7 PCP in oil had
approximately ten times the level of HCB on the surface of the poles as
expected based on the amount of PCP present. When compared to poles
treated with commercial PCP in oil after three years exposure in Ohio
(different oil), the EC-7 treated poles had about four times the level of
HCB on the surface as the commercial PCP treated poles. While these
levels are not judged to be an environmental hazard (levels of 0.001 to
0.02 ug/in.^ HCB), they do indicate that there is no benefit from the
environmental standpoint of reducing the contaminants in PCP.
We are continuing our work on photolysis of PCP, OCDD, and HCB using
wood as a substrate. As more information is generated, we are finding
that UV light degradation eliminates these products from the environment.
114
-------
-6-
Therefore, although the grade of PCP makes no difference in quantitative
amount of impurities formed, in reality the impurities are not a hazard,
whether in the PCP initially or formed from UV light.
115
-------
June 1, 1977
Mr.- Edwin L,. Johnson
Deputy Assintant Administrator
for Pesticide Programs
Environmental Protection Agency
Washington, D. C. Z0460
Dear Mr. Johnson:
In the past we have submitted information to you on the environmental
fate of peatachlorophcnol (PCP) Including information on degradation of
PCP in soil and the degradation of octachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (OCDD)
in soil. This was a part of the package which was submitted by Ron
Drear to the Science Advisory Board Ad Hoc Panel studying the dioxin
question.
We understand that the Science Advisory Board will shortly be completing
their report and recommendations. One part of the Draft copy of the
report, written by Dr. Crosby, referred to pcntachlorophcnoxide-ion
undergoing cycllr.ation to OCDD in water, and also photodegradation of
OCDD by ultraviolet (UV) light in the presence of a hydrogen donor such
as alcohol. Dr. Cronby wrote that, "the rate of photo-reduction is
inversely proportional to the degree of chlorination", indicating that the
lower chlorinated dioxina degrade faster than the higher chlorinated
dioxins. lie further wrote that, "PCP could conceivably generate OCDD
.in sunlight, but the usual presence of hydrocarbon solvents would tend
to promote eventual dioxin photolysis on the wood surface".
A« pA rt of our continuing program of environmental and health studies
with wood pr eservat Ives, we have been in vest igating the photochemistry
of pentachloroplu nol And the contained dioxins. Thus far, this work
Rupportn the fltatrmenlfl made by Dr. Cronby, and thr reHults emphasize
that dioxind that may be generated from PCP irradiation on the surface
of the wood are themsrlves degraded. A hydrogen donor solvent, however,
is not n.ecessary. Ccllulosic material can act as the hydrogen donor.
116
-------
Mr. FMwln L. Johnson
Page 2
June 1, 1977
From an environmental point of view the surface of the treated wood la
Important because It constitutes an avenue of exposure to man and the
environment. In order to simulate the surface of the wood without having
interactions such as bleeding, variability, and analytical difficulty, we
have done most of our work with filter paper Impregnated with a solution
of PCP or OCDD.
We have conducted several experiments exposing technical PCP, purified
PCP, Dowicide EC-7 PCP, and OCDD on filter paper and technical PCP
and Dowicide EC-7 PCP on wood, with and without oil present, in artifi-
cial UV light and In sunlight. Our experiments are continuing, but we
have preliminary results that we feel are meaningful even though we have
not yet completed these studies.
Working with filter paper, our studios show that when PCP Is exposed to
UV light, photodegradatlon occurs and OCDD Is one of the products formed.
Continued exposure to UV light degrades the OCDD. These chemical
reactions occur whether the PCP being exposed to UV light is of the EC-7
grade or the technical grade. What surprised us In our studies, however,
wao that regardless of the original OCDD content of the PCP, the ultimate
level to which the OCDD builds up Is about the same.
The EC-7 sample we used contained 13 ppm of OCDD. The commercial
PCP sample contained 1,466 ppm of OCDD. When 15 mg of EC-7 grade
PCP was irradiated for two days, the dioxin level on the filter paper rose
from the initial 0.2 ug to 58 ug of OCDD. When 15 mg of commercial PCP
was irradiated, the dioxin level rose from the Initial 22 ug to 64 ug. . The
EC-7 grade PC P generated 58 ug in the same time that commercial PCP
generated 42 ug, and both grades of PCP developed approximately the
same level of OCDD. Once a critical level of OCDD was reached, the
OCDD photodegradcd to lower levels.
After seven days only 3% of the original PCP remained and the OCDD
level had dropped about 33% from the peak value. After ten days the
OCDD level had dropped to about 50% of the peak value.
In our te«ts,-a large part of the PCP wan lost due to volatilization rather
than photolysis. Working without UV light, but keeping all other condi-
tions constant, f'2% of a 7. 5 mg sample volatilized In three dnys' exposure.
Similar studies hnvc n.ot been conducted an yet on OCDD. However, Inas-
much as OCDD has a vapor pressure less than 1/800 that of PCP, It Is
117
-------
Mr. I'd win L. Joltnncm
r.ip.e 3
June 1. 1977
aflaumcd that nlgnificant Ions by volatlt Izat lou does not occur. V.'e would .
expect hiphcr chlorinated dloxlns to degrade on the surface by UV light
rather than vaporize into the environment.
Our work with PCP treated v/ood polos han not reached the point today
that we can prove conclusively that dtoxins are formed from the PCP
on the surface of wood that in exposed to sunlight. V/e believe, however,
that such IB the case. The work docs Indicate that there is a breakdown
of dioxlns that are originally present or which may be formed oa the aur-
face of the wood.
Wipe teats conducted on three commercial PCP/Cellon treated poles
which were in place for three years in California, show lower PCP and
OCDD concentratlone on the ounny south side of the pole than on the north
shaded side. The PCP content on the south side of these poles averaged
0.34 ug/sq. in. and on the north side averaged 2. 08 ug/sq. in. The
corresponding OCDD levels were 0.010 ug/sq. in. on the south side and
0.024 ug/oq. in. on the north side. The lower OCDD content on the south
side of the pole, as compared to the north side reflects the effect of UV
light on OCDD. V/e interpret the higher ratio of OCDD to PCP on the
south side of the pole as compared to the north side of the pole to reflect
both the effect of UV light on the degradation of PCP aud vaporization of
PCP..
We have found somewhat the same relationship when PCP/oil treated
polos were tested. Thene also had been In service three years. On the
south aide of thene poles the PCP level wan 0.7 ug/nq. in. and on the
north side the PCP level \vas 3.1 ug/sq. in^ The OCDD levels respec-
tively were 0. 01 3 and 0. 032 ug/sq. in. These data substantiate that
even though dioxtns m ight form from PCP In wood exposed to the sun,
they also arc eventually destroyed by the sun.
"\Ve have indications that these fjame phenomena occur on poles treated
with EC-7/oil solution. The wood inside thene poles was extracted and
analyzed to confirm that (he polen were. In fact, treated with FC-7.
The PCP contained the average of 22. 5 ppm of CCDD. The. wood con-
tained an average of 1 . 1 ?"/'• TCP. However, on the surface of the poles,
wipe testa showed from 0.001 to 0. 008 ug/oq. in. of OCDD on poles
which were two week.i to two months old. V>'c have found substantially
the same levela of OCDD (.001 to .008 ug/oq. In.) on the surface of
118
-------
Mr. J'-lwln JL. Jolinnon
r.->«r -t
June 1, 1977
Ccllon polca treated with the technical pradr of PC P after 15 weeks'
c-xponurc to the oun In Pennsylvania. Whether thcoc numbers reflect
rcaulta from bleeding, PCP loaa or sunlight generation is unconfirmed.
•
We feel that thcor rcaulta nupport the conclualona drawn from the
laboratory testa thnt (1) FC-7 grade PCP on a cellulone aubatratc
exposed to UV lipht photodegrades to OCDD, reaching the same OCDD
concentration level an technical grade PCP exposed under the same
conditlona, and (2) after reaching some critical level, the OCDD con-
centration dccreaacs due to photodcgra.datl.on.. -...__
It Is Important to note that we have not found any tctrachlorodibenzo- p-
dioxin formed, due to photolysis of PCP or OCDD, cither in the
laboratory or field studies. Much of the work reported here are the
preliminary results In a continuing study,
We will keep you informed aa new Information \a generated. We will
appreciate the opportunity to visit with you to discuss the results of
our work In more detail.
Sincerely youra,
Robert D. Araenault
RDA/mz
bcc: H. 1". S|>;>(•/.
I), lj, I);ivir
D. G. n.-illn
119
-------
July 20, 1977
Mr. Donald R. Islib
Chief Deputy .Director
Michigan Dept. of Agriculture
Louis Cass Bldg.
P. 0. Box 30017
Lansing, Michigan 48909
Subject: Effect of UV Light on
Pentachlorophenol (PCP)
Dear Mr. Islib:
At the Public Hearing on Proposed Regulation No. 637 on May 26, 1977, our
Mr. R.. D. Arsenault mentioned that studies by Koppers Company had shown
that pentachlorophenol deposited on cellulosic.filter paper and exposed
to UV light was decomposed and one of the products of decomposition was
octachlorodibenzodioxin (OCDD) which in turn was also decomposed by the.
UV light. At the continuation of the hearing on July 12, the validity of
the Koppers data was questioned on the basis that the artificial Tight
used by Koppers was substantially different from sunlight. The purpose
of this letter is to provide you with additional information and comments
on these subjects.
Even though pentachlorophenol is toxic in its own right, much of the
discussion of risks before the hearing board has focused on the chloro-
dibenzodioxins that are impurities in commercial grades of pentachloro-
phenol. Octachlorodibenzodioxin (OCDD) is the most prevalent chloro-
dibenzodioxin in commercial grades of pentachlorophenol and i^s analysis
is subject to fewer uncertainties. Therefore, much of the following
discussion will focus on octachlorodibenzodioxin (OCDD). Tetrachlorodi-
benzodioxin (TCDD) was not detected as a degradation product of either
OCDD or pentachlorophenol. Hexa- and heptachlorodibenzodioxins were
detected, but not quantified.
Octa- and tetrachlorodibenzodioxins (OCDD and TCDD) deposited on filter
paper, are readily degraded by UV light from both sunlight and artificial
light sources. Experimental data are summarized in the attached tables
I and II. These tables include long and short wavelength intensities of
the artificial light source and Pittsburgh sunlight and are shown to be
similar. The calculated velocity constants, assuming first order reactions,
are shown in Table III. The experimental procedure by which these data were
obtained is also attached.
120
-------
Mr. Donald R. Islib
July 20, 1977
2.
Pentachlorophenol (PCP) (both commercial grade and Dow EC-7 grade) deposited
on filter paper is readily degraded by UV light. Experiments were confined
to artificial light, because this light source was considered to be a
reasonable facsimile of sunlight, it is uniform from hour to hour while
sunlight is not, and the degradation of pentachlorophenol by sunlight had
already been demonstrated by other investigators.
The attached paper entitled "Weathering and Stabilization of Polyolefins" by
J. A. Melchore (I&EC Product Research & Development, Vol.1, No. 4 pp 232-235
(1962) describes the artificial light source used in our work. The wave-
lengths of light in sunlight and the artificial light are shown in Figure 1.
Both sources emit light at wavelengths below 350 my which is the wavelength
below which pentachlorophenol (PCP) absorbes UV light. Pentachlorophenol
(PCP) absorbes UV light strongly at wavelengths below about 310 my.
Presumably, these are the v/avelengths that provide the energy for the
observed degradation of PCP.
Experimental data for the UV degradation of pentachlorophenol (PCP)
obtained in recent weeks are summarized in Table IV and V, for commercial
grade and EC-7 grade PCP, respectively. Starting at 7500 yg PCP, about
the same concentration on the filter paper that would be used for the
treatment of wood, more than 90% of the PCP had degraded in seven days.
In both cases, OCDD was produced as a degradation product at a peak value
of 23 yg OCDD regardless of the initial concentration of OCDD in the PCP.
The same data are shown in Tables VI and VII, in which the OCDD on the UV
exposed paper is expressed in parts per million (ppm) of the initial
quantity of PCP that v/as applied to the paper. On this basis, the OCDD
concentration reached 3060 ppm in both cases.
In assessing the risks of exposure of either humans or animals to treated
wood, chemicals on the surface of the wood should be the principal concern,
not the chemicals embedded in the internal structure of the wood. From
this point of view, the foregoing experiments on filter paper strongly
suggest that exposure of either humans or animals to either commercial
grade or EC-7 grade of Pentachlorophenol would not be significantly
different.
Yours truly,
9
f\
.^'.
P.. S. Detrick, Manager
Environmental Health and Safety Section
RSD:mjt
Attachments
bcc: !r. 15. fc.
Hr. D. 1.. Dr;'/1f!S
121
-------
EFFECT OF UV LIGHT ON PtLNTACIILORQPHENQL (PCP)
AND SELECTED CHLOKODIBEKZODIOXlffiS
1. Experimental Procedure
Standards of OCDD and 1,2,3,4-TCDD were obtained from Analabs, and the
2,3,7,8-TCDD from D. Firestone of the FDA. All dioxins were used without
further purification. All stock solutions were prepared in reagent
grade benzene, and stored in aluminum foil covered bottles in the dark.
All work concerning the TCDD was done on the 1,2,3,4-TCDD isomer unless
noted.
Dioxins to be irradiated by UV were applied in benzene solutions via a
2 cc pipet onto a 2-inch by 5-inch strip of Whatman No. 42 ashless filter
paper. The weight of a strip of filter paper was 0.72 gram, and the
concentrations of the OCDD were calculated to be in the same ratio as
they exist on a typical penta-treated pole.
The UV degradation rates of OCDD and TCDD in various sample systems
were determined in both sunlight and artifically produced UV light. The
description and operation of the artificial UV exposure system is
discussed by Melchore.3 The UV radiation was measured at the surface
of the samples by an Ultra-Violet Products UV Meter at both short and
long wavelengths. The average intensities for the unit were 1.02 milli-
watts/cm for the short wavelength (254 nm peak), and 0.63 mwatts/cm
for the long wavelength (365 nm peak) detector.
The dioxins were recovered from the filter paper by cutting the paper into
small strips and placing them in a small bottle along with a 25 cc
aliquot of benzene. The samples were shaken on a wrist action shaker
for 30 minutes, and the benzene solution was analyzed by a gas chromato-
graphlc technique.
Gas chromatographic analyses (GC) were carried out on a Hewlett-Packard
Instrument (Model 5701A) using a 3.' x 1/4" glass column packed with 10%
OV-101 on 60/80-mesh Chrom Q, a si lane-treated diatomaceous earth support.
Programmed temperature gas chromatography was used for the analysis of
allsamples containing OCDD. Samples containing only TCDD were analyzed
isothermally at 250°C. The temperature program consisted of holding
at 250°C for 8 minutes, raising the temperature to 2CQOC at S^C/min.
and holding at that temperature for an additional 8 minutes. Under
these conditions the TCDD eluted at 4.4 minutes and the OCDD at 17.0
minutes. A Ni63 electron capture detector was used because of its
sensitivity to halogenated compounds. The carriar gis was a 90/10
mixture of argon/methane, and its flow rate was 40 cc per minute. Samples
were analyzed quantitatively for either TCDD or OCOD by using band area
measurements (the height x width at half-height method) and abso1ut2
standards.
3. "Weathering and Stabilization of Polyolefins," Melchore, J.A.,
I&EC Product Research and Development. Vol. 1_ No. 4, pp 232-235,
December, 1962,
-------
2. Clean-up Procedures
a. Monsanto Method No. 70-20
This method provided by Monsanto is designed to remove from the sample
phenolic compounds which might interfere with the analysis of the
various chlorodioxins. In this method, the sample, which has been
dissolved in benzene, is extracted three times with 20-cc portions of
5% Na"OH, and backwashed twice with 20-cc portions of distilled water
containing about 0.2 gram NaCl. The benzene solution is then passed
through clean cotton in the tip of the separatory funnel. This benzene
solution is either analyzed directly or further purified by the alumina
column described below.
b. Alumina "Mini" Columns
The "mini" columns were prepared from 5 mm I.D. glass tubing which was
drawn to a fine tip. A small plug of glass wool was inserted, and the
column filled with Alcoa F-20 alumina heated for 16 hours at 400°C. The
height of the alumina was approximately 200 mm. A 5-cc aliquot of the
sample solution was placed on the column. Since some of the sample
solution was absorbed on the column, additional benzene was added until
exactly 5 cc was eluted from the column. This was done by placing the tip
of the column into a 5-cc volumetric flask and filling it to the mark as
the benzene solution eluted from the column.
3. Recovery of OCDD and TCDD from Filter Paper Strips
Standard solutions of OCDD and TCDD, were applied to the filter paper
strips and recovered as previously described. The recovery was determined
for various periods of time. These included: (a) immediately after the
benzene had evaporated, (b) after 18 hours in the dark, and (c) after
67 hours in the dark.. The results show that the recovery of OCDD was
at least 95% with or without oil; the recovery of TCDD averaged 92%
with or without oil.
4. Recovery of OCDD from Alumina "Mini" Columns
Since the alumina "mini" columns were used to clean up the wood extracts,
the recovery of the OCDD was determined to insure that no OCDD was being
adsorbed by the columns. A 5-cc aliquot of an OCDD standard, treated
as previously described, gave 100% recovery.
5. Degradation Rates of OCDD and TCDD by Artificial UV Light
Standards of OCDD, 1,2,3,4-TCDD, and 2,3,7,8-TCDD were applied to filter
paper strips and exposed to artificial I'V light for varying periods of
time. The data which is shown in Table I can be summarized as follows:
a) the degradation of TCDD is faster than OCDD, b) the degradation of
OCDD is faster in systems containing oil (P-9 or Nujol) than in systems
not contain'inq oil, c) the degradation of OCDD is faster in systems containing
Nujol than systems containing P-9 oil, and d) the degradation of 2,3,7,8-TCDD
is faster than that of 1,2,3,4-TCDD. The UV degradation of both OCDD
and TCDD on cellulose appears to occur at a faster rate than in solution.1
1. "Photo Decomposition of Chlorinated Dibenzo-p-Dioxins," Plimmer, J. R.,
and Woolson, E. A., Science. August 1971.
123
-------
J.
6. Degradation- Rat^-s _o_f p^D_d'id_ H,hJ by_.S
Standards of OCDD, with an without oil, and TCDD were applied to filter
paper strips and exposed to sunlight for varying periods of time. The
8-hour and 16-hour exposure tests were run over a period of 2 to 3 days,
and were stored in a darl< cupboard overniyht. The UV intensity during
exposure was measured quite frequently because of the extreme variation that
was observed. The intensity data was intc-grated over the exposure time
to measure total exposure. The degradation data which can be seen in Table IV
showed the same trends observed for the samples exposed to artificial UV
light, except that the rates in sunlight were slower than those observed in
the artificial light. The first order velocity constants were calculated
for all samples to further substantiate the observations noted above and
can be seen in Table III.
124
-------
Table 1
Degradation nf OCDD and TCDD by Artificial UV Light
Dloxin
OCDD
TCDD
None
TCDD
I/
OCDD
None
Nujol
P-9
Exposure
.. (hrs.)
1
2
4
6
16
67
1
2
4
6
16
4
8
16
6
16
67
Exposure Intensity
(mwntts/cm'")
Long Wavelength Short Wavelength
0.63
1.26
2.52
3.78
10.1
42.1
0.63
1.26
2.52
3.78
10.1
2.52
5.04
10.1
3.78.
10. L
42.1
1.02
2.04
4.08
6.12
16.3
68.3
1.02.
2.04
4.08
6.12
16.3
4.08
8.16
16.3
6.12
16.3
68.3
Remaining
94
88
85
77
60
33
86
81
69
58
20
38
28
6
' 2
< O.f
8
I/ This TCDD is the -2,3,7,8 isomer.
125
-------
Tahle It
Degradation p_f. Of: DP ami 1C DP b v _ fei tu r a_i_Sj i uj. i£h_
Dioxin Oil
•
OCDD None
OCDD P-9
OCDD Nujol
TCDD None
Exposure
(hrs.)
5.5
a
16
5
8.8
16
5
3.8
16
5.5
8.8
16
Exposure Intensity
(mwatts/cm~)
Long Wavelength Short Wavelength
2.26
3.86
6.88
2.26
3.86
fr.88
2.26
3.86
6.88
2.26
3.86
6.88
4.19
6.78
12.1
4.19
6.78
12.1
4.1.9
6.78
12.1
4.19
6.78
12.1
7, Remaining
89
91
83
47
47
34
48
42
18
82
77
57
Table III
Velocity Constants for the Decomposition
of OCDD and TCDD
Dioxin
OCDD
2 ,3,7,8-TCDD
OCDD
1,2,3,4 -TCDD
2,3,7,8-TCDD
OCDD
OCDD
OCDD
1,2,3,4-TCDD
UV Source
Oil
Velocity Constant, Hrs.
-i
Artificial
Art if icial
Art if ic ial.
Art if icial
Artificial
Sunlight
Sun light
Sunlight
Sunlight
-
-
Mont?
Nor. 2
None
N<;n2
P-9
Nujol
None
.002--'
. 140*
.039
.100
-215
.012
.081
.108
.035
"•''These reaction velocity constants vere calcul.it-'d by the Mathematics Group
from data presented in the papor "Photo Decomposition of Chlorinated
Dibenzo-p-Dtoxins t" PI i rimer, J. R. and W.»olson, K. A., which appeared in the
August 1971 issue oL' Sc ience. Rate studies were done in methanol solutions.
r-
-------
Tahlu IV I
Effect of UV Light on
Commercial Pentachlorophenol (PCP)
on Filter Paper
(7.5 mg PCP)
Exposure OCDD PCP
Time Found Remaining
Days ug ug
0 12 7500
1 23 2540
2 23 1800
3 19 1350
7 15 450
14 7.8 150
Table V
Effect of UV Light on"
EC-7 Pentachlorophenol (PCP)
on Filter Paper
(7.5 mg PCP)
Exposure OCDD PCP
Time Found Remaining
Days yg yg
0 0.45 7500
1 23 2100
2 23 . 1420
3 21 1350
7 18 6<30
14 8.5 180
127
-------
Table VI
Effect of UV Light on
Commercial.Pentachlorophenol (PCP)
on Filter Paper
OCDD Relative to Initial PCP
Exposure OCDO as
Time ppm of starting
Days PCP
0 1600
1 3060
2 3060
3 . 2530
7 2000
14 1040
Table VII
Effect of UV Light on
EC-7 Pentachlorophenol (PCP)
on Filter Paper
OCDD Relative to Initial PCP
Exposure OCDD as
Time ppm of starting
Days PCP
0 60
1 3060
2 3060
3 2800
7 2400
14 1130
128
-------
8.2.4
March 24, 1978
TO: Environmental Health Advisory Committee
Science Advisory Board
U.S. EPA
' Washington, D.C. 20460
FROM: 6. A. Van Gelder
Veterinary lexicologist
College of Veterinary Medicine
University of Missouri
Columbia, Missouri 65201
Telephone 314-882-7011
i
RE: Draft Report on Pentachlorophenol
Introduction:
During the past year I have served as a consultant to FDA, the
American Wood Preserver's Institute, Reichhold Chemical Company and
Vulcan Materials Company in matters relating to pentachlorophenol
and animal health. My reports have been made a matter of public
record.
THIS STATEMENT WAS PREPARED AT MY OWN INITIATIVE AND EXPENSE.
IT REPRESENTS MY PERSONAL OPINIONS IN THIS MATTER AND NOT NECESSARILY
THOSE OF ANY OTHER INDIVIDUAL OR ORGANIZATION.
In the interest of your and my time this statement will be brief.
In summarizing complex issues there is a risk of being imcomplete or
misunderstood. If any of the committee have questions please feel free
to call or write. A copy of a letter I wrote earlier is attached as an
appendix. This discusses in more detail some of the animal health
aspects.
Background:
1) I have visited most of the farms, including those in Michigan,
in which pentachlorophenol related health problems were alleged.
2) I have conducted limited studies with pentachlorophenol and related
concentrated contaminants.
3) I have reviewed the available chronic rodent studies with penta-
chlorophenol including inhouse reports submitted as part of the
Michigan hearings.
4) I set through and heard all testimony at all the Michigan Penta-
chlorophenol Hearings except for the one day Dow Hearing on the proposed
rule.
5) I reviewed all material available under freedom of information
in. the files of the Michigan Department of Agriculture related
to the alleged pentachlorophenol related herd health problems.
129
-------
Page 2
6) I have studied in detail the medical and diagnostic records related
to the herds in question.
Opinions and Conclusions:
1) The statement on page III-2-4 which in part states ". . . dioxins in
tissues from a dairy herd in Michigan in which there were undiagnosed
health problems of chronic duration.", is not an accurate statement of
the facts in this case. Serious communication and decision making
process related problems existed within the diverse group of people
handling this herd. In fact, a number of diagnoses were made. The
problem was one of poor communication. To the best of my knowledge
not a single person involved in that case had all of the information
in front of him. Investigator A was not aware of what investigator B
had found previously. The regulatory people acted without a
careful review and understanding of the .situations on the several
farms. Politics played a larger role than sttence. The problems
existing on the Lemunyon farm based on information in the Michigan
Department of Agriculture files included:
a) fatty cow syndrome related to feeding of high energy ration
in excess of milk production.
b) a random culturing of cows showed a 50% incidence of infectious
mastitis, including bacteria that are more resistent to usual
treatment.
c) infectious diseases in the calves of a type that are associated
with severe early calf losses.
d) a serious ventilation problem in the barn.
e) at times a lack of adequate bedding that contributed to the
mastitis problem.
A complete serious study of the multiple herd health findings in
the Lemunyon herd does not support the statement of "undiagnosed health
problems." Some of the problems went unmanaged, others received
partial attention.
The second part of the statement that needs amplification is ". . .
problems of chronic duration." The problems were persistent in that
mastitis, calf losses and cow losses continued over a two year period.
However, this does not mean that individual cows were sick for extended
periods. In fact, a careful review of the history shows that cows
became ill during the 21 day post-calving period, loss body condition and
in many cases died. This is generally recognized as part of the fatty
cow syndrome.
Continuing calf losses due to infectious diarrhea and respiratory
diseases in calves maintained in a totally unventilated, unheated calf
room are not unexpected.
It is my opinion that the allegation of undiagnosed health problems
should be deleted from the draft report. There is no need to perpetuate
this unfounded statement any further than has already been done.
130
-------
Page 3
The problems in the Lemunyon herd do not provide acceptable
scientific data on which decisions related to potential adverse health
effects of pentachlorophenol can be based. In my opinion, the Lemunyon
herd represents a pentachlorophenol and dioxin chemical residue problem
and not a toxicologic problem.
2) As an example of the decision making process occurring at the time,
it is pointed out that one of the herds included in the pentachlorophenol
related quarantine had blood penta levels reported as 2 parts per billion.
This is consistent with the fact they were not being housed in a penta
treated facility.
3) Two toxicologists have estimated the daily penta exposure in the
Lemunyon cattle. One estimate was 0.12 mg/kg and my estimate was 0.3 mg/kg.
Both levels are less than the no significant effect levels in long term
rodent feeding studies with technical or purified pentachlorophenol.
t
No one has shown by experimental studies or by calculations that
there is any reason to believe that the levels of exposure occurring in the
cattle could account for death or even illness.
4) In my opinion, the principle source of dioxin exposure for the Lemunyon
cattle was the sludge residue on the 2x6's used to construct the sides
of the feedbunk. I have been in numerous penta treated pole barns and
wood eating is something you just do not see with cattle. It did not
occur even in the herd that was not being fed an adequate diet.
The sludge was present as dry residue on the wood that could be
scrapped off with a knife. The residue was' pretty much gone from both
sides of the feedbunk by February 1977.
5) The data in the table at the bottom of page III-2-4 means next to
nothing to a toxicologist. What the toxicologist wants to know is:
a) what were the levels?
b) what were the "recoveries for-the method and,
c) what was the repeatability?
If the levels of HxCDD were 10-60 ppt then it should be so stated.
Few readers of this report are likely to have access to the actual data
unless it is included.
6) Page III-2-5 refers to my work on this problem. The pertinent
findings were:
a) injections of extracts of the surface residue did not affect
the health of mice at doses estimated to be equivalent to the
cattle consumming all of the material in 1-2 days.
b) Extracts of the residue did not cause skin lesions when
injected subcutaneously in albino rabbits.
c) Guinea pigs fed finely ground wood obtained from the Lemunyon
barn were unaffected during the 64 day exposure to wood,
solvent, penta and whatever else was in the wood. Exposure
was at a level comparable to the cattle eating the barn in
180 days. - - '
131
-------
Page 4
7) I am incompleteaV quoted on page III-2-5 where the statement
"... Van Gelder concluded . . . that the PCP contaminants in the treated
wood were less toxic than PCP itself." Certainly, HxCDD is more toxic
than penta. But when one is exposed to technical penta, for each gram
of material there is much more penta present than HxCDD. My position
has been and continues- to'be that if one eat3 technical pentachlorophenol
the level of penta exposure will kill you several times over before the
HxCDD exposure gets to a significant level.
8) Regulations and standards are needed relative to where treated wood
should and should not be used and also specifications should be
developed on the type of treatment and surface characteristics that are
acceptable for various end uses.
9) -I am unconvinced that low non-phenolic pentachlorophenol solves any
significant actual real world, problems. I follow the arguement on a
theoretical basis; but on a realistic basis the hazard to people and
animals is greater for pentachlorophenol than> for the contaminants when
considered from the viewpoint of relative exposures.
TO) One must keep in mind that reported laboratory studies with technical
pentachlorophenol do shed light on the relative toxicity of the contaminants,
Statements like "minimal focal hepatocellular degeneration" in rats
fed 30 mg/kg technical pentachlorophenol for 90 days is hardly alarming.
11) Considerations of chloroacne In industrial workers is a mixed bag.
Most of these people are also exposed to other chemicals, some including
TCDD. A process of producing low non-phenolic penta from technical
penta does not eliminate the industrial exposure. Workers are still
needed to operate, clean and maintain the technical penta manufacturing
equipment. In addition, individuals involved in the distillation of
technical penta to produce the Tow non-phenolic product are also
potentially exposed. Arguements based on industrial considerations must
include full consideration of the entire process.
12) The overall hazard of accumulating concentrated penta related
contaminants in barrels, tanks or flasks for later off-line incineration
or other form of disposal needs to be weighed against the low magnitude
of problems generated by technical pentachlorophenol manufacture and
usage over the past 40 years. One judgement error in handling.^ barrel of
contaminants could have great environmental and/or health" impact.
132
-------
UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI-COLUMBIA
December 13, 1977
College of Veterinary Medicine
Veterinary Anatomy-^-Physiok
Veterinary Sen
Columbia. Missouri 65201
Telephone (314) 882-7011
Dr. B. A. Schwetz .
Research Manager
Toxicology Research Laboratory
Health S*Environmental Research
1803 Building
Dow Chemical U.S.A.
Midland, Michigan 48640 '
Dear Bern:
Thank you for your letter of December 3. I certainly agree that
cousnuni cations are needed in this entire matter. Unfortunately,
your letter catches me at a rather busy time. Consequently I will not
be able to generate a detailed assessment of tha Michigan PCP-D1oxin
situation with cross references to testimony and laboratory reports.
A complete description of my appraisal and analyses of the Michirjan
dairy herd health situation would require a minimum of 50 pages.
1) Statistical Analysis:
As I stated in our October 13 meeting, I quite agree that Dunnett 1s
an appropriate test for comparing treatment means against a coimon control
group. (Dunnett, J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 50: 1096-1121, 1955). My
point is that Dunnett should also be used on the data from the first
study. See Steel and Torrie (1960) pages 101-112 for a discussion
of the various multiple comparison tests and their relative sensitivity.
I disagree that the Dunnetts t would have detected more differences
than a blanket application of student t tests. If you make 78 comparisons
at the 5% level, 4 of than by chance alone will appear significant.
Dunnetts is a more conservative test. Dunnetts will discover more 'Veal"
differences in your data, that is differences due to treatment as
compared to differences due to treatment and chance.
My concern 1s not that you would declare EC-7 similar to 95/5 on the
basis of your analyses, but rather that by using the multiple "t" tests
on the Dow-7, 95/5 data you would ba led Into declaring differences
which may be due to chance. Whether or not you or your management
makes those decisions 1s your business. I hardly think decisions costing
minions of dollars based on less than appropriate available statistical
procedures 1s an academic matter. I do not know 1f the results would
change if you used Dunnett on the original data. You will have to run
the analysis to find out. Check me to see 1f I am wrong, but 1f you use
the multiple t test on the EC-7, 83 day data, I believe you .would find
133; -
-------
Van Gelder
Page 2
December 13, 1977
that 1 mg/kg has a statistically significant effect on absolute liver
weight. In other words, multiple t finds differences that Dunnetts
more conservative test which takes Into consideration the number of
treatment levels keeps the investigator from declaring significantly
different.
My other points regarding the 83 and 2 year studies not addressed
in your summary are included here. There ara 2 biological changes occurring
in the Dow-7 groups that do not fit the overall response pattern. The
first is the depression in RBC (and coupled PCV, Hb) at 30 no/kg.
This effect at the high dose (1/4 - 1/5 the acute LD^Q) has been found
by others and not found by others. Since it is a relatively small change
and occurs at such a high dose it can be described as interesting but
not very exciting. ,
The other effect was the change in albumin levels with Dow-7. My question
was why you did not follow that up in the EC-7 studies? Since the
EC-7 studies, do not include this measure one cannot say much about it.
The other responses fit a common pattern although there are differences
in dose-response. But my point is that before one can completely
compare the results one v/ould like to see the data analyzed with a
uniformly applied method.
2) Communication:
It is my opinion that had MDA personnel been communicating with each
other and with tha MSU faculty a lot of the present situation v/ould have
been avoided. For example, it was very clear from my first visit to
Michigan in February, 1977, that the MDA-MSU people were not comtnunicatinn
in a 2-way manner. One person would say the problem was XYZ and another
would later say 1t was ABC. Consequently, my first report recommended
"I think all those involved should reconsider the evidence upon which
they are making various decisions. Hy concern is that we not chase
after something v/hich may turn out to be present but only as a
secondary or tertiary factor and not related to the cause of the
problem. Those parties involved are encouraged to go back and review
the information upon v/hich they are making decisions to ensure that each
decision is being made on cold, hard facts and not on isolated comments
or observations." My report also pointed out "there also seems to be a
number of different ideas amoung the people who have been Involved In
the problems associated with this farm (Lemunyon). I am not sure who
is responsible ta try and pull all these people together with all the
information that each one has and present some kind of debate or discussion
as to what the problem(s) really is(are). Further"as a start it would
seem appropriate for someone to obtain or prepare a detailed history as
to when the death losses occurred, how long the cows were in the barn
before dying, when.did deaths occur relative to calving and what
diagnostic services were actually conducted on each of the animals that
died."
134
-------
Van Gelder
Page 3
December 13, 1977
3) Regarding the Herd Health Problems in Michigan:
You need to decide whether you are going to be in or out on this matter.
In the past, Dow has maintained the posture of "non-involvement". If
now you want to get involved then please do your homework. Read all the
transcripts, study the laboratory reports, go to the farms, look at
the cattle, look at the management, get a herd history, look at the
entire picture.
Furthermore, separate out the conditions on the various farms, each one
was different in one aspect or another. I did not intend to leave
the impression that the only problem on the Lemunyon farm was Fat Cow
disease. He had other problems as well. Certainly all of these
disease problems can interact. The diagnosis of fatty cow was not mine,
it was made by Dr. Coy in a Tetter to Lemunyon on August 24, 1976,
and by Phase III team in a report on October 27, 1976, and by Dr. Davis
in a visit to the farm in Hay 1975> at which time he necropsied a cow
that had just died. The other piece of information to consider is the
herd history. The problem as defined by MDA occurred during the early
post parturo period which is all part of the fatty cow syndrome. Your
summary table on body weight changes is confused because you did not
separate acute from chronic effects in ths fatty cow syndrome. Reread
the paper by Morrow, p. 1626 - "1,'hen recovery from the fat cci.v syndrome
does occur there is frequently a delay in.the onset of post partum
estrus and conception due to retained fetal membranes and metritis,
and a marked loss in weight in severely affected cows".
By way of explanation one needs to sort some things out in this complex
situation. First, one rarely finds only one problem present in a herd
health situation with dairy cattle. One often finds a number of
problems including mastitis, metritis, some foot/joint problems
especially with cattle on concrete 24 hours/day and compounded by deficient
bedding, some calf problems and some nutritional problems. If I left
the impression that the only problem v/as fatty cow than I was too brief
in my consnents since my findings in this matter from the very beginning
have Identified a number of problems.
One must also sort out the clinical workups and necropsies done on
animals submitted live versus those done on animals dying on the farm.
The diagnosis of fatty cow was based on animals necropsied at the
farm. The clinical workup reported by Dr. Ellis et^al_was on chronically
ill, live cows submitted to the University
I also seriously question the purported observation of "general
debilitation" in the Michigan dairy cattle. I observed the cattle
on the Lemunyon farm as well as four other involved farms. Even in
Lemunyon's case one could not say there was a general debilitation. The
herd I saw in February was in average condition. There were some thin •
135
-------
Van Gelder
Page 4
December 13, 1977
cows as well as some very fat cows. They were bright, alert, active.
The alleged chloracne simply was not present. The few skin lesions I
observed on the dorsal neck were typical of skin rubbing lesions seen
1n cattle that have an opportunity to rub the top board on the manger.
In the casa of Leinunyon, this was a 2x6 with tongue down. The tongue
was worn smooth. To conclude that chloracna was present without
substanting histopathology is unwarranted In my opinion. Consequently,
since I have personally observed the cattle, looking specifically for
significant skin lesions and not finding them I must conclude that they
did not exist. I do not know who actually made such a diagnosis. The
discussions I attended alluded to open abscesses or bleeding skin ulcers
on the legs. ,Again, I did not see these when I examined the cattle.
What I did see were some hemotomas on the legs which often result from
cattle getting banged around against free stalls and other corners
or protrusions. On occasion these become infected, abscess and ulcerate.
You might be interested in noting that some Michigan farmers were
blaming the hemotomas on PBBVs as they stood and talked to you while
leaning on a sharp ended pipe jutting out in the main alley way*
The herd in the worst shape was the Dale Mice herd in which he- had
been quarantined for unsanitary conditions because of a deep accumulation
of manure and several dead cows being found in the barn by the milk
Inspector. Hardly a usual situation. He v/as quite frankly, by his own
admission, not providing adequate caro for tha cows. Consequently,
he lost his inilk market, then ran out of feed, was broke and
could not buy feed, and his cattle, as per the Michigan Veterinary
Diagnostic Laboratory report of February 28, 1977, suffered from
malnutrition secondary to poor quality faed; suppurative mastitis.
I saw the Hies herd in March, they "were uniformly thin, but alert and
active. They were receiving a minimal amount of hay as their total diet.
Anyone wanting more information on the management and operation of this
farm can obtain access to other reports in MDA files under the Michigan
sunshine law. I have read them and as a result concur with the opinion
of Dr. Davis, MDA that the problems on the Mice farm were caused by factors
other than PCP or dioxins. If cattle are being fed a grossly inadequate diet
one does net need to look under rocks to determine the cause for loss
of body flesh.
The diagnoses of mastitis and calf viruses were made by MDA or MSU
veterinarians. The remarkable conclusion Is that the mastitis was
claimed to be caused by bacteria which were allegedly cleared up by
antibiotics but cell counts persisted. This conclusion was reached
1n the light of 1) there is nothing concrete in the. record that any cows
were cultered after treatment to see if in fact the infection v/as
eliminated. This in the light of a 50% infection rate that included not
only strep, but also staph. A background staph problem is more difficult
to eliminate than the strep and furthermore, a background staph problem
may become n-ore-severe when the strep infection is cleared up.
136
-------
Van Gelder
Page 5 :
December 13» 1977
A great deal was being made about immune suppression based on this
mastitis situation. One must seriously question such an implication
based on the above workup. The other factors not accounted for in the
workup as testified to included lack of evidence that milking equipment
was, in fact, checked to make sure it was in proper working condition,
the stage of lactation was not considered in the evaluation of cell counts
and other stress factors such as bedding were either Ignored or not
considered.
Other information on the Lemunyon herd was obtained which showed that cow
death losses were occurring primarily in tha period of 21 days post partum.
This fits the fatty cow syndrome. This coupled with the feeding pattern
and radical changes in diet, to advice given Mr. Lemunyon to feed dry
cows separately from lactatinn cows plus the HQA diagnosis of fatty cow
syndrome cannot be Ignored.
If one reads the paper of Morrow one finds that narked loss of weight
1s seen in severely affected cattle. What one needs to differentiate is
pre-partum condition from post partum condition. Consequently, the
initial recommendation to MDA was to get a good herd history. This
was never done by MDA to the best of tr.y knowledge. Others have
done more in this area.
A similar restraint 1s warranted in the interpretation of clinical
pathology data. Are tha samples from acutely ill cows? Chronic cows?
Cows with systemic Infections? These are important factors because
fatty cow syndrome is not a simple pathologic condition.
Regarding your conanent about white blood cell counts the following is
offered. Cows have WBC counts ranging from 7-10,000 with aged dairy
cows having counts as low as 5,000. Cattle normally have (approximate)
25-3G£ neutrophils, 60-652 lymphocytes, 5% monocytes and 2-5" eosinophils.
If you look at the blood picture for the 13 Lemunyon cows obtained by HSU
in March, 1977 you will find two cows with elevated WBC counts both of
which have greatly increased neutrophil counts' which indicates an
active infectious process. The remaining cows have WBC counts
within published normal ranges. Furthermore, if one looks closely at
the chlorodioxln immune suppression data one gets a picture of immune
suppression coupled with a decrease in absolute lymphocyte counts. If
you carefully analyze the Lemunyon blood data you will find that absolute
lymphocyte counts are within normal ranges with the exception of the
two cows with a left shift Indicating an active Infection.
The above comments hold for the blood picture on the other farms as I
remember them. It has been some time since I carefully studied those.
Consequently, I do not know what data your summary table is referring to
when it makes the suirsnary statement of "WBC count markedly increased".
13-7-
-------
Van Gelder
Page 6
December 13, 1977
Dr. Coy mentioned an eoslnophelia in six cows. I would guess you were
as surprised as I was when he did not follow that up with a diagnostic
check for Internal parasites. You may recall the response from Dr. Wise
the hearing officer. ,
As an aside we also found a marked eosinophelta in the Mice cattle we
necropsled. The intestinal parasitic lesions fit the usual pattern.
I would suggest a bottom line along this avenue. Both Dow toxicologists
and myself have estimated the PCP dose for Lemunyon's cov/s to be 0.12-0.3
mg/kg per day. Your group analyzed the lumber and as I interpret the
results the dioxin levels found indicate a typical technical PCP. Based
on all your studies on PCP and on all the literature do you really
think there is any perceptible risk to the health of a cow with 10 ppt
HxCDD or 1.4 ppb HxCDD in liver in light of the published work on
larger TCDD liver residues in rats at levels claimed to be no effect?
I appreciate the fact one can alv;ays say "We do not know because we
have not tested it", but as a toxicologist one often uses his total data
base in making interpretations subject to experimental verification.
I feel much more confident about accepting the t1DA diagnosis of fatty
cow, mastitis and viral infections and questioning the totally unsubstantiated
diagnosis of ch'Ioracne than I would be by accepting the chloracne diagnoses
and rejecting the other diagnoses mace by MDA. At least I know MDA
veterinarians have seen the other conditions on numerous occasions.
I doubt if they ever saw chloracne or ever heard of it before. Add staph
to your list of causes of infectious mastitis. It is an important
consideration in view of the way the situation was handled.
Also, differentiate between the acute phase of fatty cow and the chronic
sequalea. Cows may take one entire lactation to recover. If appropriate
management changes are not made then the syndrome can be more severe
in the second and third lactations.
Dr. Davis's primary reservation with the fatty cow diagnosis as the primary
factor was because he had not seen such large death losses previously. Yet
has published on such a high mortality. More recent studies out of
Tennessee support the finding of high morbidity and high mortality with
this disease.
I am a little bit confused by your reference to the gross and histopath data
on the various PCP studies as being the primary concern. In the production
grade study of November 1971, on page 10 of the report it is stated
"Gross examination at necropsy revealed no compound related changes.
Minimal focal hepatocellular degeneration and necrosis were observed upon
microscopic examination of Hvers from rats maintained on diets containing
the top dosage level of sample 9822A; these changes were not observed
1n rats maintained on a diet containing 95/5 which provided a similar dosage
of PCP." In view of the apparent minimal nature of the changes at a
dally dose equivalent to 1/4 - 1/5 the acuts LD5Q one can also come to the
conclusion that there is not much of a hazard associated with low level
(fractions of mg's) exposure to technical PCP.
-------
Van Gelder
Page 7
December 13, 1977
I quite agree with the findings of Dr. Wise that sensible use restrictions
and use guidelines will do more to reduce the hazard associated with POP.
Alone that line has Dow come up with a recommendation on the use of EC-7
to treat feed bunks?
I quite agree with your statement "also because the dioxin content of PCP
could be reduced, we have consistently recommended that the nonphenolic
content of PCP be reduced, etc.". If I was a corporate manager and had
just invested a million dollars in a thermal oxidizer(incinerator) and
saw an opportunity to get dual use by cleaning up 2,4,5-T and PCP
at the same time, I would do it also. It is a neat marketing manuver.
Unfortunately, the toxicologic picture is less clear because of the
difference in opinion on the actual hazard associated with technical
penta. Is Dow aware of any problems encountered in livestock related
to the non-phenolic content in Dowicide-7? Or did that product have a
clean use record for 30 years except for the obvious occasional misuse?
Sincerely yours,
Gary A. Van Gelder, D.V.M., Ph.D.
Professor and Chairman
GAVGrnc
cc: Dennis Lindsay
139
-------
8.2.5
REICHHOLD CHEMICALS, INC.
Creative. Oic/TTU&fcr
ru
RCI BUILDING, WHITE PLAINS, N. Y. 10603
April 18, 1978
Address Reply To
REICHHOLD CHEMICALS. INC.
P.O. Box 1482
Tacoma. Washington 98401
Telephone 206-572-5500
Teletype 910-449-2355
Dr. Sheldon D. Murphy
Professor of Toxicology
Department of Pharmacology
University of Texas Medical School at Houston
P.O. Box 20708
Houston, Texas 77025
Dear Dr. Murphy:
SCIENCE ADVISORY BOARD
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH ADVISORY COMMITTEE
Ad Hoc Study Group on Pentachlorophenol Contaminants
Draft Report — Public Hearing April 3, 1978
The purpose of this communication is to amplify. Reichhold's testimony pre-
sented to the Committee April 3, 1978.
On page k of our testimony. I made reference to the Committee's draft report,
page 1-10, paragraph 10, where it is concluded that technology is now available
which could markedly reduce the levels of chlorodioxin and dibenzofuran
contaminants in pentachlorophenoi (PCP). I pointed out that consideration must
be given to the question of trade-off of occupational hazards. It is assumed
that the process referred to in the draft report is the facility designed to
produce low-dioxin content pentachlorophenoi at Dow Chemicals' Midland,
Michigan complex. It has been known for some time, to those skilled in the art,
that the dibenzo-p-dioxin and dibenzofuran contaminants can be separated from
pentachlorophenoi and tetrachlorophenol by various methods. The problem
arises in how to safely handle and safely dispose of the concentrated residual
waste streams created by removing these contaminants. We have been
informed by Dow that they destroy these contaminants by diluting them with
large quantities of other liquid wastes and then incinerating thiii large quantity
of highly contaminated material.
Reichhold has considered a number of possible ways of handling and disposing of
the waste streams, which would result from removing and concentrating these
contaminants, and have discarded each because of potentially insurmountable
problems. Some of the disposal methods which we have considered include:
1. Collecting and shipping to a suitable disposal site. No disposal site is
known which is licensed to accept these wastes. In addition, permits to
transport these hazardous wastes would have to be obtained from various
governmental agencies. Also, transportation requirements would have to
be set out.
140
-------
Dr. SheJdon D. Murphy
April 18, 1978
Page 2
2. Incineration. It has been suggested in the report that technology to
dispose of these waste streams exists -- presumably this means by
incineration. Construction of a suitable incinerator designed to handle
this highly toxic chlorinated material, as the principal material to be
incinerated, is a very expensive and difficult proposition. Experts advise
us that these highly chlorinated refractory materials require temperatures
in the order of 1200°C to assure complete conversion to HC1, CCu and
H-O. Because of the presence of HC1 and other corrosive by-prodUcts,
the materials of construction are critical and expensive. Operating costs
to achieve and hold the necessary temperatures are high.
To the best of our knowledge, there is no licensed incinerator in operation
that will accept these materials for incineration. Therefore, we must
conclude that the technology is not available to satisfactorily dispose of
these waste streams with the confidence that the chlorinated materials
will be completely destroyed. We are aware of work performed by various
departments of government which have addressed this problem. Reichhold
strongly suggests that before the assumption is made that technology is
available to safely dispose of the hazardous waste streams created by
removing and concentrating the contaminants in PCP, that the Technology
Assessment Pollution Control Advisory Committee of the Science Advi-
sory Board be requested to review this entire question. The secretary of
this Committee is Lloyd Taylor.
We have applied substantial resources to the investigation of the chlorination of
phenol without the formation of chlorodioxins and have, as a result of this
study, substantially reduced the chlorodioxin and dibenzofuran content. This
reduction yields a technical grade PCP with a total dioxin content in the range
of 1200 ppm.
The ideal solution would be to produce pentachlorophenol without co-producing
any toxic contaminants. The technology to do this is not known. We believe
that the years of experience with technical grade pentachlorophenoi has
indicated that it is far better to widely distribute a less than no effect
concentration of the contaminants than to have them separated and exist in one
highly concentrated stream at several widely dispersed manufacturing sites.
These highly concentrated streams would be subject to possible catastrophic
error in handling which would result in a major hazard to the immediate
surroundings. The handling and disposing of these highly toxic waste materials
is subject to all of the hazards of transportation — broken pipelines, leaking
drums, derailed rail cars, etc.
If they are ultimately conveyed safely to an incinerator, then the safe operation
of the incinerator is of paramount importance. The incinerator must be
constantly monitored or the contaminants will merely be made airborne and
dispersed over a substantial area in more than toxic effect concentrations. An
improperly operated incinerator could contaminate large areas of land and
create an incident of the magnitude comparable to that which occurred at
141
-------
Dr. Sheldon D. Murphy
April 18, 1978
Page 3
Seveso, Italy. We feel that the question of safe disposal of the highly
contaminated waste streams created by removing the impurities from technical
grade PCP must be thoroughly addressed by experts before industry is forced to
create a dangerous waste for which there is currently no acceptable means of
disposal.
We would appreciate your communicating this addendum of our testimony to the
Committee members for consideration.
Again, thank you for the opportunity to appear before your Committee. We
deeply appreciate the many hours of concentrated effort that the members
applied in bringing the facts to light regarding pentachiorophenol.
Very truly yours,
REICHHOLD CHEMICALS, INC.
F. J. Shelton
Vice President
Science
-------
TESTIMONY ON PENTACHLOROPHENOL TO THE
SCIENCE ADVISORY BOARD ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
ADVISORY COMMITTEE
April 3, 1978
My name is Frederic J. Shelton. I am Vice President, Science
-------
to assess the safety of commercial grade PCP. As a result of the work which
Reichhold has conducted, the company is not aware of any studies or reports which
support the premise that commercial grade PCP containing trace quantities of
contaminants, including chlorodibenzo-p-dioxins (CDD's) and chlorodibenzofurans
(CDF's),, present any significant hazard to man and the environment when properly
used. The results of these studies and investigations have been presented to the
Federal EPA as well as to various state regulatory bodies.
Reichhold conducts physical examinations on each of its production
employees on an annual basis, and more often if the man requests. No unusual physical
conditions have ever been reported for these men. Reichhold field personnel have had
more than twenty years of contact with its PCP users and are unaware of any human
or animal health problems attributable to properly used PCP. PCP finds commercal
use in the wood treating and preservation industries because of its toxic properties. It
must be handled and treated with respect because of its innate toxicity. The handling
and treatment afforded PCP and PCP containing products, because of the toxicity of
PCP itself, is sufficient to protect the users, and others who come into contact with
PCP treated wood, from any hazards due to the chlorodioxins contained in the product.
In the early 1950's, PCP was used and recommended for a broad spectrum
of pesticide uses. In most of these uses, PCP was applied from a solution prepared by
dissolving the PCP in a petroleum distillate. If a water solution was required, the
alkali salt of PCP was prepared by reacting the PCP with aqueous sodium or potassium
hydroxide. Early uses of PCP included all phases of wood preservation and protection,
both against microorganisms and insect attack. The preservation of water based paints
and adhesives, and the preservations of textiles and cordage, as well as weed control,
were also significant uses of PCP. In addition, PCP was used in red mite control in
1.4%-
-------
poultry houses. Reichhold felt that many of these historical uses of PCP presented the
possibility of excess user exposure to the irritationai and toxicological properties of
PCP itself. Although Reichhold has had a large number of registrations covering a
wide variety of PCP uses, it currently maintains a registration for the use of PCP for
manufacturing purposes (wood preservation) only. Reichhold's PCP is sold to
commercial wood treaters and is used in the industrial treatment of wood by a variety
$i
of processes. We believe that commercial grade PCP, as manufactured by Reichhold
and others, does not pose undue hazard to man, livestock and the environment, when
properly used.
We would like to now comment specifically on several portions of the
draft report of the Ad Hoc Study Group on pentachlorophenoi contaminants, dated
March 1978. On page 1-8, under Item 3, Conclusions, paragraph 1, Reichhold confirms
that it has not detected any TCDD (2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-para-dioxin) in any
samples of PCP which it has analyzed. On page 1-9, paragraph 5, the conclusion is
drawn that exposure to man and animals to CCD's migrating from PCP treated wood
should be prevented. Reichhold supports this conclusion and suggests that consider-
ation be given to promulgating appropriate rules and regulations to prevent contact of
human foodstuffs or animal feeds directly with PCP treated wood. In addition, we
think it would be desirable to restrict the use of uncoated PCP treated wood from
certain portions of decorative fencing, porches and other recreational structures where
direct human contact could be anticipated.
Reichhold agrees with the conclusion drawn in paragraph 7 that the most
probable opportunity for excess human exposure to PCP is in the PCP production and
utilization industries. Reichhold would like to emphasize the point that any proposed
significant changes in manufacturing or application of PCP must consider the effect
-------
that these changes would have on the workers involved.
A number of alternative methods for producing various grades of PCP
have been proposed. Some of these processes present the possibility of increased
worker exposure to PCP and/or PCP contaminants because of the characteristics of
the final PCP produced. Reichhold has examined its process for the production of
PCP, as well as the handling characteristics of its finished product, and feels that
presently it cannot suggest a reasonable alternate to its PCP product. Reichhoid urges
that before any action is taken, that all aspects of the production and utilization of
any new PCP product be thoroughly examined. We feel that particular emphasis should
be placed upon the physical characteristics of the final PCP product, as well as the.
creation and disposal of any waste or by-products caused by its production.
On page I-1Q, paragraph 9, Reichhoid certainly agrees that certain uses of.
PCP be objectively examined and that regulation be considered to reduce those
applications of PCP treated wood which may come in contact with humans or animals,
or food products. However, as we have repeatedly stated, we believe that there is an
absolute need for PCP treated wood for use in and around farm buildings and
structures where degradation by microbial attack from soib and other materials is
critical.
Paragraph 10, on the same page, states that certain technology has been
disclosed which is designed to reduce the levels of CDD's and CDF's in PCP through
distillation of technical PCP. However, we do not totally agree with the statement,
"It would seem prudent to control the contaminants to the extent possible by best
manufacturing practice." We would like to emphasize that consideration must be given
to the question of trade-off of occupational hazards. Reichhoid feels that there are
significant occupational hazards associated with the use and handling of the PCP
146
-------
products which it has seen on the market which are claimed to have reduced levels of
CDD's and CDF's. Reichhold, furthermore, is very concerned about the concentration
of CDD's and CDF's in waste streams generated by the distillation process used for the
cleanup of the technical PC P. The economic impact evaluation would have to take
into consideration the distillation process and cleanup of PCP as well as the
incineration of the waste stream generated. It would also have to take into account
the automation of the process which would then minimize exposure to the waste
stream. The commercial process used by Reichhold to produce PCP does not produce a
concentrated waste stream containing CDD's and CDF's. We urge the Science
Advisory Board Environmental Health Advisory Committee to very seriously consider
this possible route of exposure to concentrated CDD's and CDF's streams produced in a
PCP distillation process when considering possible hazard trade-offs.
Continuing, on page II-3, a chart is given exemplifying the composition of
a purified grade of PCP, labeled Dowcide EC-7. It is noted that only certain
chlorinated CDD's are listed, namely the octachloro, the heptachloro and hexachloro
dibenzo-para-dioxins. However, on referring to Section V-3, page 52, Appendix No. 4,
it is indicated that the possible number of CDD's are listed as being 75 in number. The
hexa, hepta and octa CDD's would account for approximately 13 of the possible 75.
This would appear to leave 61 additional CDD's which could be present since it has
been established that no 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-para-dioxin has been detected in
any domestic grade of PCP commercially available today. Since the purpose of this Ad
Hoc Study Group is to examine and report on all of the CDD contaminants in PCP, we
feel that comment is needed relative to the presence or absence of one or more of
these other possible CDD's. We feel that the study should be thorough and complete
before any regulatory action is taken. It would be extremely disruptive to the industry
147
-------
if considerable sums of money and technical development were expended to reduce
certain CDD's only to learn at some later date that certain remaining CDD's were
present at levels which were then determined to be environmentally undesirable. It is
Reichhoid's position that prior to any regulatory action mandating a reduction in
chlorodioxins, that consideration should be given to all of the chlorodioxins which
might be present.
*,'.
On page III-l, the report states that octochlorodibenzo-para-dioxin, or
OCDD, has shown little toxicity. Reichhold would like to point out that the
commercial technical grade of PCP which it manufactures, as well as material
manufactured by other companies, contains as the major CDD contaminant, OCDD.
Typically, the amount of OCDD present is on the order of five to seven times greater
than the amount of hepta and hexa CDD's.
On page III-3, one reference was cited which detailed an experiment pro-
ducing chloracne in rabbit ears. This test indicated that commercial samples of PCP
have produced chloracne in the rabbit ear bioassay tests wherein purified PCP did not
produce chloracne. Reichhold conducted similar tests at IBR-US Laboratories, in
Miamisville, Ohio. The results of these tests indicated that no significant differences
could be discerned in the results obtained using either commercial, analytical or
purified commercial grades of PCP. The results obtained from one material were
comparable to results obtained with another. This information was submitted to the
Science Advisory Board Ad Hoc Group,.and the results of this tests have not been
included in this report.
On page III-9, paragraph 4, reference is made to work done by Kimbrough
in 1972. Reichhold has reviewed all referenced articles authored by Renate
Kimbrough, dated 1972 and has not seen any report implicating technical grade PCP in
148
-------
causing teratogenic effects in women. We suggest that this reference be verified.
On page III-12, Conclusion 4, Reichhold agrees that all commercial grades,
technical and purified, of PGP contain quantifiable amounts of CDD's; however, we are
not convinced, nor are we aware of any studies which conclusively demonstrate that
&af^t-4^^ze A*<
the concentrations of CDD's present in technical PCP are sufficient to*.bo-biologically
-------
allegedly connected with PCP exposure, has resulted in a number of papers being
published which define and describe the herd health problems in these Michigan dairy
herds. As a result of this work, it was concluded that these dairy herd problems were
not related to exposure to PCP or CDD contaminants. All of these data and reports
have been previously submitted to the National Institute of Environmental Health
Sciences, Environmental Protection Agency, as well as to the Food and Drug
Administration, and to the Ad Hoc Study Group on pentachlorophenol contaminants.
In addition, the Michigan Department of Agriculture conducted a
hearing on the application of Reichhold for reinstatement of its state PCP registration
which was summarily suspended during the dairy herd incident. Dr. Gilbert H. Wise,
DVM, the hearing officer appointed by the Department concluded, after the week-long
hearing, that the cancelled registrations should be reinstated. Dr. Wise, in an 18-page
decision, found in part as follows:
"No evidence was developed showing that wood preser-
vative formulations containing penta have presented demon-
strable risk to the food chain through exposure of food
animals to CDD (chlorodioxins) in penta. . .
"The evidence, while not removing all possibility of
hazard, does not support a finding of any measurable
magnitude of risk or liklihood of harm to the human food
chain from exposure of food animals to CDD in technical
penta."
On page IV-5, a hypothesis has been put forth which suggests that chlorin-
ated dioxoins, chlorinated dibenzofurans, polychlorinated biphenyls, polybrominated
biphenyls, and chlorinated azoxy benzenes should be considered as a class from the
150
-------
toxicological standpoint. Reichhold disagrees with this premise because it has been
repeatly demonstrated that specific members of a class of compounds may have vastly
different biological activities. One needs only to review the work done in the drug
industry to realize that it is dependent upon these variations in activity, relative to
structure, to produce drugs which minimize pain and suffering. We think it would be
extremely risky and unsupportable to regulate various individual readily identifiable
•f
chemical compounds as a class rather than as individuals. .
There are numerous reports that PCP has been found in many parts of the
environment, including in man and animals. It has generally been assumed that this
PCP has been coming from the wide-spread commercial use of PCP as a wood
preservative or pesticide. It should be noted that it has been reported that PCP may
/'«
be formed as a. metabolite from animals and microorganisms. Furthermore, it is re-
ported that PCP may be formed in the environment from other chemicals such as
hexachlorobenzene and LINDANE and from the chlorination of drinking water.
The source of CDD's in the environment is not exclusively from PCP.
Other chemicals such as hexachlorophene and polychlorinated biphenyls also contribute
CDD's. Other widely used pesticides such as 2,4,5-T are recognized as containing
CDD's.
PCP has a number of registered uses for which there are reasonable
alternatives. Reichhold would urge consideration of these registered uses of PCP and
that an effort be made to determine where proven alternative materials are available.
Perhaps this concern over a wide-spread use of PCP can be more easily regulated by
restricting the registered uses of PCP to those for which there is no reasonable
alternative, such as for wood preservation.
On the whole, Reichhold applauds the work which has gone into the pre-
151
-------
paration of this draft report. We feel that much effort has been made to factually
evaluate and report on the data and literature which is available; however, we would
appreciate consideration of the points which we have raised today.
Again, thank you for this opportunity to appear here today.
152
-------
8.2.6 Testimony of Dr. Robert L. Johnson
•The Dow Chemical Company's position with respect to the non-
phenolic impurities in PCP has been and continues to be:
1. that pentachlorophenol containing such impurities above
certain levels manifests enhanced toxicological responses
as demonstrated by laboratory test animal experiments.
2. that these non-phenolic impurities should be minimized by
the manufacture and use of a PCP containing the least
amount of these impurities technically possible.
3. that it would not be possible to assess adequately the hazard
of the many individual non-phenolic impurities in PCP.
Therefore, it was logical and prudent to reduce these impuri-
ties to the lowest possible level for commercial PCP and,
thereby minimize the risk to the producer, the users, and
the environment.
4. that readily identified adaptable technology is available
to separate the non-phenolic impurities from PCP and that.
disposal of such impurities can be dealt with at the pro-
ducing site where acknowledged risk can be minimized.
5, that a pentachlorophenol can be manufactured in commercial
quantities that mimics chemically purs PCP in both acute
and subchronic toxicological studies. With the urging of
the EPA and at reasonable expense to Dow, such a commercial
facility has been constructed and is being operated.
The ad hoc committee draft report represents a significant and
worthwhile effort to compile all the available information per-
tinent to the presence of non-phenolic impurities in technical
PCP. The report is thorough in pointing out that:
153
-------
1. Suitable analytical methods for the specific dioxin and
' furan isomers present in technical PCP are lacking.
2. There are very little data on the environmental persistence
and transport of the dioxin and furan contaminants of PC?.
3. The comparative chronic toxicological information on purified
versus standard commercial PCP is limited. (Sub-chronic
studies have revealed toxicological differences between
these two grades of PCP, especially in the liver.)
4. There are virtually no data on the chronic toxicity of the
non-phenolic contaminants of PCP.
5. The biological significance of the finding of low, but
detectable, levels of chlorinated dioxins. in tissues of
farm animals is not presently known.
6, There is insufficient information on occupational exposure
of man to these PCP contaminants by manufacturers or users
to allow quantitative assessment of the relative hazard of
«.
purified PCP versus commercial products containing dioxin
contaminants.
These information deficiencies are used in the draft report to
explain why an ultimatum to the wood treating industry to manu-
facture and use only purified grades of pentachlorophenol cannot
be issued.
154
-------
On the other hand, the draft report, without exception, describes
the. constant concern associated with the presence of the non-
phenolic impurities in PCP. For example:
1. The toxicity of the polychlorinated dibenzodioxins and
dibenzofurans is recognized.
2. The recent reports of induction of neoplasms by TCDD raise
the specter that the polychlorinated dibenzodioxin contami-
nants in PCP may also have this potential.
3. The finding of low but detectable levels of chlorinated
dioxins in tissues of farm animals is a matter of public
health concern.
4. Reports of occupational exposure to chlorinated dibenzo-
dioxins, which resulted in adverse health effects in man,
were mentioned.
All these references and comments clearly indicate the relevenc^
of conclusion, No. 10, which reads in part,
"Tec/mo£og«/ -ci now ava-c£a6£e u)ki.c.h. dou.id ma.A.ke.d£y
reduce tkt £ivzt& o
-------
The PGP producers were initially urged by federal regulatory
agencies to reduce the non-phenolic impurities content in 1971,
and again advised to proceed in that direction in 1973. It is
now 1978; specific timing as to when all commercial PCP should
be of a purified grade, or the specific reasons as to why a
purified PCP grade is no longer necessary, is urgently needed.
The original charge to the ad hoc committee was to comment, to
the extent possible, on the potential hazard to humans which
can be attributed to registered uses of PCP and the extent that
this hazard may be mitigated by the use of the commercial pro-
cess which results in lower levels of the contaminants of
interest.. We urge that this charge be completely satisfied as
soon as possible in a less ambiguous manner and without
encumbrances of" economic constraints which have created ambiguity
in the present conclusions.
156
-------
8.3 COMMENTS OF INTERESTED PARTIES
157
-------
8.3.1
SUBJECT: Comments on EPA Science Advisory Board Environmental Health
Advisory Committee Meeting: Pentachlorophenol Contaminants
(April 3, 1978)
TO : Ernst Linde, Executive Secretary, Science Advisory Board (RD-673)
FROM : Paul E. des Rosiergf'Senior Staff Engineer, Industrial and
Extractive Division (RD-681)
I believe it is important that the Science Advisory Board (SAB)
be made aware of certain facts in order that all aspects of the
pentachlorophenol (PCP) contaminants issue are addressed correctly.
As you know, I was present during the session held on
Monday, April 3, 1978, during which time current producers of PCP,
namely, Dow Chemical Company, Reichhold Chemicals, and Vulcan
Materials Company presented their respective statements to the
SAB Environmental Health Advisory Committee. I am considered an
Agency expert on the treatment and control of organochlorine
chemicals, have in-depth experience with military defoliants
dating back to 1967, and as a result, am thoroughly familiar with
disposal/detoxification methods for Herbicide Orange and its teratogenic
artifact, tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD).
In this respect, I was a member of the EPA Herbicide Orange
Disposition Advisory Panel to the U. S. Air Force/Defense Supply
Agency, provided technical consultation to the State of Missouri
Department of Health concerning the Verona, MO TCDD episode, and was
interviewed by the British Broadcasting Corporation regarding the
Seveso Icmesa plant TCDD incident in Italy.
In retrospect, I was particularly impressed at the meeting by
the perception of Dr. Van Gelder, a veterinarian, who in his
testimony, alluded to the fact that disposal of concentrated
quantities of PCP contaminants might prove to be more of a problem
than maintaining the status quo.
At this time, I wish to delineate some pertinent historical
facts relating to significant dioxin-type incidents:.
(1) 2.3 million gallons (24 million Ibs) of Herbicide Orange
with approximately 2 rag/kg TCDD (about 49 Ibs) could not be disposed
of by incineration either in Illinois (Monsanto's Sauget facility)
or in Texas (Rollins contract facility), or by land assimilation
-------
in Utah or In Oregon.
(2) Chemical detoxification of Herbicide Orange was proposed to
the U. S. Air Force by the Velsicol Chemical Corporation, which entailed
deesterification via alkaline hydrolysis/solvent extraction/UV-photo-
chemical decomposition/reformulation; however, Velsicol withdrew its
proposal. Agent Chemical Incorporated was selected by the Air Force
to demonstrate at pilot scale, an activated coconut charcoal method
for "stoichiometric" selective removal of TCDD from Herbicide Orange;
however, disposal of spent charcoal cartridges containing high concen-
trations of_ TCDD presented a significantly greater environmental risk,
and the project was officially curtailed.
(3) The M/T Vulcanus incinerator ship was employed to combust
Herbicide Orange at sea some 200 miles southwest of Johnston Island
in the South Pacific. Incineration of the defoliant was accomplished
at 1250-1450°C with a dwell/retention time of 1.3 second, at a cost
exceeding $3 million. Subsequent to the successful incineration,
the M/T Vulcanus has been unable to obtain recertification because
of contamination of the ship's storage tanks/deck with miniscule
amounts of TCDD (ppt).
(4) There also exists today in Verona, MO, approximately 4600
gallons of highly contaminated (300-350 ppm TCDD) chlorinated still
bottoms from previous hexachlorophene manufacture. Systex Agribusiness,
the present owners of the industrial site, and the State of Missouri
have been unable to secure an environmentally acceptable method for
the ultimate disposition of the waste residue.
(5) Presently, for every 5000 Ibs/hr of PCP manufactured,
approximately 10 percent or 500 Ibs/hr of still bottom residues
are produced, which may contain, at varying concentrations: octa-,
hepta-, hexa- chlorodibenzodioxins and chlorodibenzofurans, tetra-
chlorophenol, trichlorophenol, chlorophenoxyphenols, hydroxydiphenyl
ethers, hexachlorobenzene, chlorinated biphenyls, chlorinated polymers,
etc. This residue production would be equivalent to roughly a 2000
tons/year quantity requiring disposal.
Specifications for the first at-sea incineration of Shell Chemical
Company organochlorine waste residues by the M/T Vulcanus were based
on Mississippi State University Prof. B. J. Stojanovic's muffle
furnace data obtained with analytical grade TCDD.v%He found TCDD
completely combusted between 980-1000°C.
From the foregoing, it becomes obvious that public awareness and
anxiety play important roles as to how, when, where, and by which
method a "dioxin" contaminated material/waste, is to be treated.
159
-------
Should the SAB Environmental Health Advisory Committee recommend that
technical grade PCP be purified to reduce contaminant levels to less
than 0.1 percent, then EPA is faced with a predicament - the question
of trade-off of occupational hazards.
There is no doubt that it is technically feasible, although at a
higher cost, to produce commercially purified grade PCP that can meet
reasonable regulatory constraints relative to chlorinated dioxins and
dibenzofurans. Furthermore, I have doubt concerning Dow's contention
that it possesses incineration capability to "destroy" the waste
residues therefrom. Nevertheless, the Dow case is unique - the Midland,
MI facility represents probably the largest integrated petrochemical
complex in the U. S. and large volumes of waste residues are admixed
with relatively small volumes of PCP wastes, the latter essentially
losing its identity through volumetric dilution before incineration
commences.>
Such is not the case with Reichhold and Vulcan, however. Special
incinerators would have to be designed, parts ordered, constructed,
and subsequently evaluated prior to application for an operating
permit. Such a permit request would undoubtedly require a public
hearing because "dioxins" are present in the wastes. Based on my
experience, I can assure you.that the resulting permit requirements
will be severely restrictive (e.g., exhaustive monitoring, operational
constraints, etc.) and quite possibly could eliminate land-based
incineration as a technology option. (Since both Reichhold and
Vulcan would solicit strong guarantees from EPA that, once equipment
was on order, they would indeed be allowed to proceed with full-scale
construction and be able to operate the incineration units without
undue harassment from environmental groups. Naturally, EPA would be
in no position, legally or otherwise, to honor such requests.)
In my opinion, there are but four alternatives available for
consideration by the SAB regarding this matter:
(1) At-sea incineration aboard a vessel similar to the M/T
Vulcanus.
(2) Privately owned/contractor operated incineration facility
(e.g., Marquardt's high efficiency SUE incineration unit.)
(3) In-process change/process modification (i.e., catalyst
substitution) to minimize dioxin/dibenzofuran byproduct
production - to include analysis of feedstock (phenol)
quality.
(4) Encouragement of accelerated R&D into incorporation of PCP
waste residues as feedstocks to cement kilns.
All options could be explored should the SAB desire.
160
-------
8.3.2
UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI-COLUMBIA
April 24, 1978
College of Veterinary Medicir
Veterinary Anatomy—P|^»lo
Columbia. Missouri 65*
Telephone (314) 382-7C
Mr. Ernst Linde
Executive Secretary
Environmental Health Advisory Committee
Science Advisory Board A-101
Washington, D.C. 20460
Dear Mr. Linde:
Enclosed are 20 copies of a report containing my additional comments
on the draft report on pentachlorophenol contaminants.
Please distribute these to the proper persons.
Sincerely yours,
'.£/£.
Gary A. Van Gelder, D.V.M., Ph.D.
Veterinary lexicologist
GAVGrnc
161
-------
April 15, 1978
Part II (part I dated
3/24/78)
TO: Mr. Ernst Linde
FROM: Dr. Gary Van Gelder
RE: Comments on Draft Report on Pentachlorophenol
The following additional comments are made relative to the draft report.
1) The charge to the committee was to assess the hazard to humans due
to contaminants in pentachlorophenol. Other than industrial
chloracne resulting in all probability from exposures to mixtures
of various 'chemicals the document fails to document any significant
human health hazard that has resulted from 40 years of use and
exposure. This statement is made with the acknowledged exception
of reported instances of gross negligence or intentional ingestion
resulting in illness and death.
The report fails to clearly elucidate the point that the present
methods of producing low non-phenolic content PCP will still
possess the presently alleged chloracne hazard since the starting
reactions are similar for both processes. The report implies
that obtaining concentrates of the contaminants is less hazardous
than working with very diluted concentrations. The above implication
is made in the report without any evidence that there was any
attempt to assess the risk involved. Additionally, comments made
at the hearing clearly demonstrated the lack of unanimous agreement.
among waste disposal specialists on the reliability of incineration.
Critical issues are:
a) frequency of stack monitoring
b) levels of detection
c) location of stack relative to wind direction and population
d) presence of fail/safe devices
t
Without such information and risk assessment data, how can a
responsible decision be made to move from technology A to technology
B, especially when technology A has not been shown to be associated
with any significant, isolatable problem? Risk assessment involves
more than simply saying since process B exists we should use it.
2) Page 1-7 of the report refers to dioxins being found in milk from
Michigan cattle but no data are presented. The report later refers
to dioxins in liver and fat. This point needs clarification.
3) Page 111-14, Table II - The data are summarized in such a way as to
ignore dose. An important part of risk assessment is consideration of
dose and evaluation of dose-response patterns.
162
-------
In one sense the draft report begins to pull together the available
information. The next steps are evaluation and interpretation.
In my opinion, the last steps remain as uncompleted tasks for the
committee.
4) Page II1-9 - states "technical grade PCP has been implicated in
causing teratogenic effects in women - Kimbrough, 1972." The
report by Kimbrough does not make this statement. Stillbirths with
PCB's are reported.
5) Page II1-9 - The Larsen study cited is inadequate to address the
question of placenta! transfer. Based on information presented
it is likely that placenta/fetal PCP levels are comparable to
maternal blood levels.
6) Statistical methods used to evaluate the various 90-720 day studies
are not consistent. See my letter to Dr. Schwetz of Dow Chemical
which was attached to my comments dated March 24.
7) While I appreciate the comments of several members of the committee
that their concern is not animal health, I need to point out that
there are people in the public sector who, based on their understanding
of comments made by members of this committee believe that low level
exposures to technical PCP kills cows. I am satisfied with the
progress being made to resolve that-misconception.
8) The remaining issue is one of safety/hazard evaluation. It is
amazing that an EPA sponsored committee was not provided or did not
review the results of studies sponsored by EPA to evaluate the human
health effects of PCP. Why this body of information has been ignored
is unexplainable.
One cannot prove safety for any product or process, what one does
is evaluate toxicity and assess risk (hazard). Consequently,
studies done where technical PCP was fed to animals provide information
on the toxicity of the PCP related contaminants.
Furthermore, evaluation of worker related health problems or the
lack of problems are also important items to consider in risk assessment.
9) My principle concern in this entire matter has been based on a
broad view of the entire situation. First, PCP is an economic
poison. Fortunately, it's toxicologic characteristics are such that
it does not present a large hazard. But PCP residues have been
found in food products of animal origin. To the extent -that those
residues can be reduced or eliminated without causing a major
economic effect is a worthwhile goal. Additionally, PCP constitutes
only 5% of what is put into wood to preserve it. The toxicity and
residue characteristics of the other 95% of the material has not
been determined. What is found as residues are generally those things
that excite an electron capture detector.
These considerations plus my own observations of over use and
unnecessary use of PCP treated wood in places that facilitate
animal exposure leads me to a broad based recommendation that addresses
• ....... 163" , .
-------
the entire problem. Namely, the need to develop sensible use
restrictions to reduce animal exposure. The casual rubbing
against a post or occasional lick of a post is of no concern to
me. The issue is one of feed bunks, bunker silos and use of
treated wood in above grade, dry locations. The concern expressed
in item 10 below is also a part of my decision information base.
10) I have reason to believe that .the level of dioxin formation on the
surface of treated wood exposed to light is higher than that felt/to
occur as expressed in the committee discussion. It is of sufficient
concern that Dow has conducted and has expressed their intent to
conduct additional studies in this regard.
164
-------
DOW CHEMICAL U.S.A.
May 9, 1978 P. o. BOX
2040 DOW CENTER
MIDLAND, MICHIGAN 48640
Mr. Ernst Linde
Executive Secretary
Environmental Health Advisory Committee
Science Advisory Board
U. S. Environmental Protection Agency
Washington, D. C. 20460
Dear Mr. Linde:
Attached is the requested description of the general procedures
utilized by Dow Chemical U.S.A. to contain and destroy the con-
taminants resulting from the production of DOWICIDE* EC-7
Antimicrobial grade of pentachlorophenol. We believe this is
the kind of additional information that was needed by the
Environmental Health Advisory Committee Study Group on Penta-
chlorophenol Contaminants to assure itself that these impurities
can be feasibly handled.
As Dow has repeatedly stated, we contend that disposal of the
toxic impurities inherent to commercial pentachlorophenol
should be dealt with at the producing site where acknowledged
risk, would be minimized. The fact that we produce and market
a grade of pentachlorophenol with significantly reduced non-
phenolic impurity content supports this position.
We have included 10 copies of the requested information. If
additional copies are required for distribution, for example,
to members of the Environmental Health Advisory Committee,
please do not hesitate to let us know.
Very truly yours,
Robert L. Johpson
Designed Pro&ucts Department
Technical Service & Development
517/636-1524
mbh
attach.
*Trademark of The Dow Chemical Company
AN OPERATING UNIT OF THE DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY
-------
DISPOSAL OF PENTACHLOROPHENOL IMPURITIES
Dow Chemical U.S.A.
The product known as DOWICIDE* EC-7 Antimicrobial grade of.
pentachlorophenol (PCP) differs in chemical assay from the
older form of PCP. Numerous publications describe the com-
mercial process utilized in the U.S. to make PCP. As noted
in these publications, the process reaction mixture is main-
tained as a liquid (approximately 10°C above the product
melting point); no solvent is used or required. The commer-
cial process utilises final chlorination and the necessary
temperatures to produce a product with a pentachlorophenol. ~ —
content in the range of about 85-90% . These production con-
ditions also result in the formation of the various contaminants:
found in PCP.
The finished reaction mixture/ in the Dow process, is distilled.
to yield a grade of PCP which meets the imposed specifications
for DOWICIDE EC-7. A copy of the DOWICIDE EC-7 technical.
bulletin, which describes the composition, is attached.
The still bottoms resulting from this additional PCP processing
contain the non-phenolic contaminants identified as chlorinated
dibenzo-p-dioxins and chlorinated dibenzofurans.. Other materials
included in the still bottom residue, or tars, are the chloro-
phenoxyphenols, chlorodiphenyl ethers, and even a percentage of
higher phenols such as pentachlorophenol itself.
These tars are handled, stored and transported to the Dow
tar burner in closed systems. Eye protection, rubber gloves
and protective clothing are routinely used by all personnel
*Trademark of The Dow Chemical Company
-------
-2-
involved in these operations. A rigorous industrial hygiene
and health monitoring program is and has been in effect for
these personnel. Anytime that work on contaminated equipment
is needed/ extreme protective measures are taken including
full rubber suits and self-contained breathing apparatus.
Normal operating conditions in the tar burner are maintained
to achieve a minimum 1.8-second residence time at temperatures
of 900-1000°C. The temperature is continuously monitored with
appropriate warning alarms and shut-off devices. Combustion
gases go through a three-stage scrubbing system before discharge
to. the atmosphere. The scrubber water is treated in the waste
water treatment plant before recycle and/or discharge to the ..
Tittabawassee River.
5/9/78
167
-------
technical data
DOWICIDE, EC-7 ANTIMICROBIAL
GENERAL '
DOWICIDE EC-7.Antimicrobial is Daw's designation for pentachlorp-
phenol, purified grade. This., antimicrobial is designed to comple-
ment DOWICIDE 7 Antimicrobial in all industrial uses that require
the control of bacteria and fungi, particularly in the area of
wood preservation. " - . " ': . =• •
PHYSICAL PROPERTIES. '
(These are laboratory or literature-data typical of the product ~
and are not to' be considered as, or. confused with, specifications".)!
STRUCTURE " ':
Formula ...... -....-. . . . .,...;.. .-, . . .. .. . . . .
Molecular Weight. ........ .. ... .. . .... . . .. .. 266.
Flash Point, °F ................... ..... Non
Fire Point, °F .............. ...... . .. None-
Specific Gravity, 25/25°C ........ ....... .1.9
Solubility, approx. g/100 g solvent at 25 °C
Acetone . . ...... . ..... ......... 52
Methanol ................... .... 175
Ethanol (F30) ............... ..... 125
Isopropanol .......... . . . . ....... 80
Diacetone Alcohol . . ................ 145
DOWANOL TPM Glycol Ether ......... ...... 115
Ethylene Glycol ...... ............. 12
Methylene Chloride ..... . ...... ...... 7
o-Xylene .... ...... 7 ...... ...... 18
Turpentine ........ ......... . ,..; .... 7
NOTICE: This information is presented in good faith, but no warranty, express or implied, is given
nor is freedom from any patent owned by The Dow Chemical Company or by others to be inferred.
THE DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY
DESIGNED PRODUCTS DEPARTMENT • MIDLAND. MICHIGAN 48640
-------
DOWICIDE EC-7 ANTIMICROBIAL
Page 2
PRODUCT DESCRIPTION
DOWICIDE EC-7 Antimicrobial has. the following composition:
Active ingredients 100%
Pentachlorophenol 88%
2,3,4f6-Tetrachlorophenol 12%
Chlorinated Dioxins
Octachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin 30 ppm, max.
Hexachlorodibenzo-p-dioxins 1 ppm, max.
Description Off-white te
light yellow
prills.
EPA Reg. No. 464-431
PACKAGES
Prilled and pelleted forms of DOWICIDE EC-7 Antimicrobial are
sold in multiwall paper bags having a net weight of 50 pounds,
in fiber drums having a net weight of 300 pounds/ in wire-bound
boxes having a net weight of 2500 pounds and in bulk to be
transported in tank trucks and rail cars. The block form is
sold in units, having a net weight of 2000 pounds.
(Typical Laboratory Data)
% DOWICIDE EC-7
Test Organism for Inhibition
Trichoderma. viride, ATCC#8678 0.0025-0.005
Trichoderma sp., Madison P-42 0.001-0.0025
Ceratocystls pilifera, ATCC215457 0.0005-0.001
PolyporusTullpirerae, ATCC211245 <0.0001
Rhi2opus"gtolonifer/ ATCC#6227a '0.0001-0.00025
Lenzxtes trabea, Madison 617 0.0001-0.00025
Ceratocystis ips, ATCC#12860 0.001-0.0025
Chaetomxum qloEosum, ATCC#6205 0.0001-0.00025
Aspergillus nigefT"ATCC#6275 0.001-0.0025
Bacillus cereus var. mycoides, ATCCf11778 0.0005-0.001
Bacillus subtilis, ATCCS8473 0.005-0.01
Escherichia coli, ATCCS11229 0.025-0.05
Pseudomonas aeruginosa, ATCC#15442 0.1-0.25
Enterobacter aerogenes, ATCCf13048 0.05-0.1
Streptomyces griseus, ATCC^10137 O.OOOS-OJOOl
FlavobactirTum arborescens, ATCCS4358 0.00025-0.0005
Formulators may be required to develop their own efficacy data
well as use and precautionary labeling based on the represented
properties and intended uses of their finished formulations, anc
in accordance with all pertinent laws and regulations.
—169
------- |