United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Office of
Solid Waste and
Emergency Response
Publication 9200.5-4011
January 1992
&EPA CORAS Bulletin
Office of Emergency and Remedial Response
Office of Program Management OS-240
Intermittent Bulletin
Volume 2 Number 1
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT RESPONSIBILITIES
AND AUTHORITIES OF EPA PROGRAM STAFF
Number 6 in a series
In an effort to clarify the roles and responsibilities of EPA staff and facilitate more effective
planning, management, and administration of Superfund contracts, the CORAS Bulletin printed
a series of five articles, address-
ing key aspects of Superfund
contract management. The first
article, "Financial Responsibilities
and Authorities of EPA Program
Staff," which was published in
the December 1988 edition
(Number 2) of the CORAS
Bulletin, introduced the series
and provided a general overview
oftheareasof responsibility and
the types of contracts involved.
The subsequent articles presented
additional details on each of the
major areas of responsibility:
"Review of Contractor Work
Plans"(September 1989,Number
5), "Review and Certification of
Contractor Invoices" (May 1989,
Number 4), "Review of Contractor
Financial Reports and Ongoing
Monitoring" (December 1990,
Number 10), and "Development
of Work Assignment/Task Order
Budgets" (July 1991, Number 11).
This series of articles focused
on financial oversight of Super-
fundcost-reimbursement
contracts,including Remedial
Planning (REM),FieldIhvestigation
Team (FIT), Technical Assistance
Team (TAT), Alternative Remedi-
alContractStrategy(ARCS),andEn-
vironmental Services Assistance
Team (ESAT) contracts as well as
other Superfund cost-reimburse-
ment contracts. The program staff
responsible for the financial
management of these contracts
includes the Project Officer (PO),
the Deputy Project Officer/
Regional Project Officer (DPO/
RPO), the Remedial Project Man-
ager (RPM), and the On-Scene
Coordinator (OSC). These individ-
uals are referred to as "contract
monitors" for the purpose of de-
scribing the financial responsibili-
ties in this series of articles.
The importance of these topics
is emphasized in the October 1991
GAO report, "EPA Has Not
Corrected Long- Standing Contract
MaragpmentProblems.''This report
identified two major areas of
responsibility as problematic:
preparation of independent cost
estimates and reviewof contractors'
monthly invoices. Due to the
importance of these topics and
for the benefit of those who have
not before received the CORAS
Bulletin, this article summarizes
the key aspects of Superfund
financial management presented
in detail in each article of the five-
part series. The specific issue of
the bulletin in which each article
appeared is noted. If you would
like to obtain a copy of one or
more of these articles, please
contact Jalania Ellis FTS 260-8533.
-------
DEVELOPMENT OF WORK ASSIGNMENT /TASK ORDER BUDGETS (JULY 1991, NUMBER 11)
In accordance with the Federal
Acquisition Regulations, the work
assignment budget should be
developed as an independent, in-
house estimate and should not be
obtained from the contractor, private
firms, or other outside sources.
Independent government cost
estimates can be valuable aids in
reviewing the contractor's budget
estimatebecausetheyprovideabasis
for evaluating, negotiating, and
controlling contractor costs.
According to the G AO report, when
prepared,independentcost estimates
were used effectively in negotiations
of thecontractors' proposedbudgets.
In one case, the contractor's proposal
was decreased from $3 million to $1.6
million.
The basic steps in defining the
work and developing the work
assignment or task order budget are
scoping the work, estimating labor
hours, and developing cost estimates.
Each of these steps as well as the tools
available to assist the contract monitor
in performing these activities is
summarized below.
Thefirstandmostimportantstep
in preparing a work assignment or
task order budget is to define the
scope of the work to be performed.
Because the contract monitor's
ability to develop a conceptual
understanding of the work to be
accomplished will have a direct
impact on the accuracy of the cost
estimate, thecontractmonitorshould
prepare the work assignment using
any existing information related to
the assignment, drawing upon
previous experience with similar
assignments to help determine the
magnitude and complexity of the
effort. In defining the scope of work,
the contract monitor should first
break the work into individual tasks,
desaibingeachtaskinasmuchdetail
as possible. The contract monitor
should then evaluate the complexity
of each task and identify specific
requirements and resources for each.
The second step in developing
thebudgetis to determine thelevelof
effort required for each task defined
in the scope of work The contract
monitor should use his/her best
professional judgement to identify
the full range of labor resources
needed to complete this task. While
making this determination may
prove difficult, it is important to
thoroughly assess the technological
skills and hours required in
relationship to the complexity of the
scope of work
Once the contract monitor has
scoped the work and developed
estimates of labor hours for the work
assignment, he/she can develop a
detailed cost estimate, the final step
in the budget development process.
To develop a detailed cost estimate,
the contract monitor uses the specific
labor hour estimates by labor
category developed previously. The
total hours per labor category can be
multiplied by the loaded hourly rate
for that category under the specific
contract The loaded hourly rate has
been adjusted to include costs for
fringebenefits and overhead and can
be obtained from the Project Officer
orContractingOfficerforthe contract
Other direct cost estimates can be
developed by detailing task
requirements, such as the number
and location of trips and the number
and volume of reports. From this
detailed breakdown of estimated
costs, the contract monitor
can compare the independent
government cost estimate with the
contractor's proposed budget in the
work plan, highlighting and
evaluating the reasonableness of any
discrepancies. Comparison of the
two cost estimates provides an
informed basis for evaluating specific
costs and negotiating with the
contractor concerning any cost
discrepancies.
A variety of tools are available to assist the contract monitor in
estimating work assignment costs.Each of these tools is outlined below.
^ Beeper's Notes - provides useful assistance in scoping RI/FS tasks and
developing an average range of costs based on site complexity and historical
experience
^ Scheduling and Cost Estimating Expert System (SCEES) - provides a
useful tool for estimating the level of effort and costs for RI/FS tasks at complex
sites
> Cost of Remedial Action (CORA) Model - assists in evaluating remedial
action technologies at a site and computing estimates based on past experience
with the application of these technologies
^ Remedial Action Bid Tabulation database - provides historical data on
remedial action costs at similar sites for comparison purposes
^ Work Assignment Resources Planning (WARP) program - provides
assistance in computing total work assignment cost estimates based on resource
projections and contract specific rates.
A chart, which includes a contact point for each tool, Superfund site*
phase for which each tool is most useful, and the directive/publication
that announced each of these budget development tools, is included with
the original article.
-------
REVIEW OF CONTRACTOR WORK PUNS
EPA remedial contracts,
primarily ARCS and Headquarters
support contracts, require the
submission of a work plan in
response to the work assignment
The contract monitor is responsible
for reviewing, and for some
contracts, formally approving the
work plans within a set number of
days. Inevaluatingacontractorwork
plan, it should be kept in mind that
the work plan is a deliverable and
can be quite expensive to produce.
While some work plans may contain
similar language, there are no
"standard" costs for work plans and
each work plan must be evaluated
individually based upon the actual
work involved.
The review of technical and cost
portions of a work plan is highly
interrelated. The staffing, approach,
and schedule in the technical plan
will drive work assignment costs.
Independent government cost
estimates provide a basis for
comparisonandreviewof contractor
workplans.Ifthe proposed level of
effortdeviatesfromthegovemmenfs
estimate, the contract monitor must
ensure that the deviation is justified.
In addition to using independent
government cost estimates to assist
in work plan reviewand negotiation,
contract monitors should seek
assistance from specialists whose
experience and expertise are
applicable to conditions at a given
site. The monitor should take full
advantage of resources that are
available at the Regional office,
including the contracting officerfe),
experienced technical specialists,and
existing historical data. The ARCS
^REVIEW AND CERTIFICATION OF CONTRACTOR INVOICES
Under the provisions of a cost-reimbursement
contract, the costs incurred by the contractor in per-
forming the work must be allowable, allocable, and
reasonable as defined by Federal Acquisition
Regulations. Of these three, the contract monitor is
responsible for determining the "reasonableness" of
invoice charges. "Reasonable" charges have values
that seem to be justified and legitimate and are what a
prudent person would pay under like circumstances in
the conduct of competitive business. Several tools are
available to assist contract monitors in determining if
charges are reasonable. Individual work assignments,
technical direction documents (TDDs), technical
information documents (TIDs), as well as monthly
progress reports may be useful to contract monitors in
evaluating the reasonableness of contractor charges.
Additionally, contract monitors may review average
historic cost of similar activities to help determine the
reasonableness of contractor charges.
Invoice reviews allow the government to foresee
future problems, such as when contractors' charges are
going to exceed the established budget and to avoid
being charged a higher than reasonable amount.
Therefore, these reviews can reduce the risk of excessive
charges. In its report, GAO identified invoice review
as a continual problem. Additional assistance is
available to RPMs in EPA's new Superfund contract
management course, which includes an invoice review
module.
The contract monitor should use a systematic
(SEPTEMBER 1989, NUMBER 5)
ContractsUsers' Manual (April 1989)
is also a useful resource in reviewing
work plans. The manual contains as
Appendix HI a six-page Work Plan
Checklist which includes questions
on addressing the work assignment,
skill levels/hours, material and
equipment, travel, consulting and
subcontracting effort, computer
effort aprinting, and safety and
contingency and must be completed
and submitted with an approved
ARCS work plan to the Contracting
Officer.
Contract monitors have the right
to reject any unsatisfactory product,
including work plans and any
unnecessary or unreasonable costs
which shouldnotbepaid. Contractor
work plans may be approved,
approved with changes, or
disapproved.
(MAY 1989, ISSUED
checklist of questions to evaluate each invoice prior to
its certification. In evaluating an invoice, the monitor
should examine specific line items, including: direct
labor, travel, equipment, other direct costs, and
subcontractor costs. Each category of cost should be
reviewed separately with key factors being
considered for each. A summary checklist that can be
used by the contract monitor to evaluate each invoice
is presented as an Exhibit following this article. The
invoice reviewer will determine whether the payment
request is commensurate with the items delivered
and/or the services performed by the contractor.
At the completion of each invoice review, Project
Officers are required to complete the Project Officer
Approval form, regardless of who has reviewed the
invoice. Response, including invoice certification, is
required within five working days after receipt.
Despite the short time frame permitted for invoice
review, program staff should seriously examine cost
information. If certain costs do not appear to be
reasonable, the contract monitor should make every
effort to obtain from the contractor the rationale and
back-up supporting the expenditure. The right to
disallow costs can be exercised only by the
Contracting Officer. A cost is disallowed when the
Contracting Officer has made a final determination
that the government will not pay the cost in question.
Additionally, previously submitted invoices can
always be reexamined. It is never too late to question
contractor charges.
3
-------
EXHIBIT
Checklist for Voucher Review
YES NO N/A
• 1...UIUL I1U--
GENERAL
LABOR
TRAVEL
EQUIPMENT
OTHER DIRECT
COSTS
SUBCONTRACTOR
COSTS
1 The contract number is valid.
2. The account number or work assignment number is valid.
3. The LOE charged is commensurate with progress.
4. The labor mix appears to be appropriate.
5. Hours charged by category are within the ceilings or estimates.
6. Overtime was charged.
6a. Overtime charged was at premium rates.
6b. Overtime charged was approved in advance.
7. Local travel expenses are warranted and reasonable.
8. The purpose of out-of-town travel is known and appears consistent with project
needs.
9. The appropriate number of people traveled.
10. The purchase of equipment received prior Contracting Officer approval.
11 . A lease-versus-purchase analysis was performed and is documented.
12. The quality of the equipment is commensurate with the need.
13. The quantities of equipment purchased are reasonable.
14. EPA Form 1730-1 is attached to the invoice.
15. Photocopying charges are commensurate with magnitude of deliverables.
16. Communications charges are commensurate with need.
17. If present, the amount of "miscellaneous" charges seems reasonable and
commensurate with the work performed.
18. Subcontractors have received appropriate EPA approvals to work on contract.
19. The level of subcontractor effort charged was commensurate with the level of
progress made.
20. The subcontractor's costs are appropriate for the type of activities and progress
made.
21 . If the subcontract is cost reimbursement, the prime contractor has provided a
breakdown of charges by element of cost.
I
I
~|
Comments/action items:
Name:
Date:
-------
REVIEW OF CONTRACTOR FINANCIAL REPORTS AND ONGOING MONITORING (DECEMBER 1990, NUMBER 10)
Cost-reimbursement type
contracts require a great deal of
financial oversight since the
contractorhaslessincentivetocontrol
costs thanunder fixed-price contracts.
Therefore, it is critical on all cost-
reimbursement contracts that the
contract monitors regularly review
the financial progress of the contract
and identify any problems to the
Contracting Officer.
To monitor contractor financial
performance adequately, the contract
monitor should use both the
contractor invoice and monthly
progress reports. There are several
tools which are available to assist the
contract monitor in the comparison
and evaluation of the costs. These
tools include: technical progress
reports, previous monthly financial
reports, estimated costs provided in
the technical direction documents,
technical information documents or
work plans, and knowledge of
comparative or similar costs.
Discussion on the review and
certification of contractor invoices
waspresentedunderthethird section
of this article; therefore, this section
will focus on use of financial
information provided in monthly
progress reports.
In accordance with the EPA
Acquisition Regulation, progress
reports under cost-type contracts
must provide specific information
concerning contract financial status
including the folio wing: actual costs
and direct labor hours expended
during the current reporting month,
cumulative costs and direct labor
hours expended from the effective
data of the contract through the last
dayof the reportingmonth, estimated
costs and direct labor hours to be
expended during the next reporting
period, average cumulative incurred
cost per direct labor hour compared
to average cost per direct labor hour
derived from the estimated cost of
the contract, and actual costs and
direct labor hours incurred for each
work assignment issued and
estimates of costs and staff hours
required to complete each work
assignment Additional reporting
requirements may be specified in the
contract The monitor must request
the minimum reporting information
necessary to adequately determine
the reasonableness of costs.
In reviewing and evaluating the
financial performance of the
contractor, contract monitors should
review costs in relationship to the
technical progress on the contract
Based on the financial data provided
in the progress report, the work
assignment manager can compare
theactual costs and direct labor hours
incurred to the estimates required to
complete the assignment Review of
costs in relationship to technical
progress will help identify any costs
whichdonotappearto besupported
bytechnicalaccomplishmentsduring
thecurrent or anyprevious reporting
period. In reviewing financial
reports,contractmonitorsshouldalso
compare monthly expenditures
against those reported in previous
monthly financial reports. This will
help identify any major fluctuations
in costs.
Through this review, thecontract
monitor may identify several types
of problems that require corrective
actions, such as unauthorized use of
overtime, inefficient use of contractor
resources, and minor growth trends
in expenditures. The type of
corrective action required depends
on the severity of the problem.
Potential problems and the actions
required to correct each were
illustrated in an exhibitto the original
article.
The contract monitor should not
hesitate to request additional
information if he/she does not
understand any of the costs. If the
contract monitor believes that the
contractor is spending more than is
reasonably required to accomplish
certain portions of the work, the
Project Officer should request an
explanation or more backup from
the contractor and can suspend
payment of the amount in question,
if warranted.
The most important thing to
remember in reviewing financial
performance of contracts is that it is
the responsibility of the contract
monitorto identify anyproblems and
to work with the Project Officer and
the Contracting Officer to take
corrective action as soon as possible.
This will prevent waste of public
funds and ensure that EPA obtains
the necessary contractor services
within the required parameters.
If you have future articles or comments for the CORAS Bulletin, please submit them to:
W
Jalania Ellis
USEPA.OS-240
401M Street, SW
Washington, DC 20460
If you are interested in receiving back issues of the CORAS Bulletin, please call
Jalania Ellis, FTS 260-8533.
For any changes to the "Key Regional Personnel in Superfund Contract Manage-
ment" chart, please notify Jalania Ellis, FTS 260-8533.
-------
CORAS BULLETIN BOARD
Hazardous Site Evaluation Division
As of November 20,1991, the FIT contractor offices have officially
closed. In the future, any questions regarding sites that FIT had
worked on should be addressed to the Regional Site Assessment
Section Chiefs. Questions regarding contractual matters should
be addressed to:
Mark Thomas _0i
PCMD
SF/RCRA HQ Operations Branch
Management Section
FTS 260-9172
Steve Caldwell
OERR
Site Assessment Branch
Field Operations Section
FTS 260-8195
Contract Related
Meetings, Conferences, and Training
Meetings & Conferences
CORAS Forum
(tentative)
April 1992
Washington, DC Lynn Beasley 202-4026
CORAS
11th Hazardous Materials Spills Conference April 21 - 24,1992 Philadelphia, PA
co-sponsored by the National Response Team,
the National Governors Association, the
Chemical Manufacturers Association and AIChE
Training
See attachments
Dorothy McManus
260-8606
-------
COMMENT S...
After completing this page, please fold it into three sections so that the return address
appears on the outside. Please staple or tape together. Thank you for taking the time to assist in
future articles for the CORAS Bulletin.
WE WANT YOUR FEEDBACK!
We would appreciate the assistance of the contract management clientele to help with the
selection, writing, and prioritization of the CORAS Bulletin (bulletin) articles. This section will
become a standard feature for the bulletin. To get us started, below is a list of prospective
articles for the bulletin. Please review the list and place your vote by each one using numbers 1 -
8 (1 being high and 8 being low).
Space is also provided for additional articles you believe will interest the contract
management clientele. Please list them and they will be provided in the next bulletin for voting.
Indemnification Report
Property (management)
Guidance on Exercising Program Management Costs (generalize, lessons learned)
Interview Region 3's OSCs and FAOs-Sharing the success of the Program.
Invoice Review
Suspensions
Requirements for Small Business Set Aside and Managing the Program
$50 million Set Aside in RA Budget for Quick Response at NPL Sites
or
I would like to contribute future CORAS Bulletin articles on:
Article(s)
Contact Name:
Address:
Telephone:
would like to read future CORAS Bulletin articles on:
-------
Fold Here
&EPA
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Washington, DC 20460
Official Business
Penalty for Private Use
•300
POUCH
First Class Man
Postage and Fees Paid
EPA
Permit No. G-35
Ms Jalania Ellis
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
OERR/OPM/CORAS
401M Street, S.W.
Mailstop: OS-240
Washington, DC 20460
Fold Here
-------
CERCLA Education Center
In November of this year, OSWER's Technology Innovation Office
began offering training courses through its newly established, state-of-the-art
CERCLA Education Center (CEC). Initially, courses will be taught at the
North Carolina State University and may be offered at other locations in the
future. The CEC course curriculum, which includes classes for both entry-
level and experienced environmental professionals, is designed to build a
firm base of knowledge and facilitate a better understanding of the laws,
regulations, policies, and sciences that make up the Superfund program. The
CEC takes a tiered-structure approach to training, which allows participants to
choose the courses that best meet their needs. To learn more about the CEC
curriculum, schedule of courses, and class locations, please review the
attached fact sheet.
-------
The CERCLA
Education Center
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
OFFICE OF SOLID WASTE AND EMERGENCY
RESPONSE
TECHNOLOGY INNOVATION OFFICE
The CERCLA Education Center (CEC) provides the opportunity
for On-Scene Coordinators (OSCs), Remedial Project Managers
(RPMs), other Superfund staff, and other Federal and State
environmental professionals to build a firm base of knowledge on
the laws, regulations, policies, and sciences that make up the
Superfund program. This unique training forum was created by
the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA's) Technology Innovation
Office (TIO) within the Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response (OSWER).
The CEC begins with the Fundamentals of Superfund tor all
newly hired OSCs and RPMs. This course for entry-level OSCs
and RPMs is organized around the National Contingency Plan
(NCP), Superfund's implementing regulation, to give participants
an understanding of their roles and authorities in the Superfund
program. During the Fundamentals course, participants also will
gain an understanding of their role in the context of a complete
hazardous waste response.
The CEC continues from the Fundamentals of Superfund\n\o
itstiered-structure approach to training. The CEC offers a cafeteria-
style offering of courses where both entry-level and experienced
environmental professionals can tailor a Superfundtraining program
to their needs.
WHAT IS THE CEC'S FUNDAMENTAL CURRICULUM?
The CEC's structure assists Superfund professionals in obtaining
the knowledge and skills that will help ensure that they can
effectively manage all the tasks that make up the Superfund
process. The CEC's tiered training structure begins with a
preparation session known as the Fundamentals of Superfund.
During this Fundamentals session, to be offered quarterly, entry-
level OSCs and RPMs receive an introduction to and overview of
the Superfund cleanup process. This session includes a statutory
and enforcement overview, a discussion of Superfund roles and
responsibilities, basic skills in incident and site management, and
training in communication skills.
WHAT OTHER TRAINING DOES THE CEC OFFER?
Once entry-level OSCs and RPMs have completed the
Fundamentals of Superfund \bey, like more experienced Superfund
professionals, can use the CEC's flexible structure to design a
training program that meets their needs. As mentioned above, the
tiered structure of the CEC moves on from the Fundamentals
training course to more specific program training. For example,
OSCs may enroll in a course on the removal process; RPMs are
eligible for a parallel course on the remedial process. Sessions on
the Superfund enforcement process and community relations are
also offered.
FUNDAMENTALS OF SUPERFUND
NOVEMBER 1991
The Fundamentals of Superfund. the first
session and debut of the CEC, will be held
November 4 through 8,1991, at North Carolina
State University in Raleigh-Durham, North
Carolina.
The November curriculum will include an
introduction to and overview of the Superfund
law, a discussion of roles and responsibilities
for response actions, an enforcement overview,
and training on the remedial and removal
processes. Participants will take part in a case
study that will guide them through the Superfund
process. This case study will provide first-
hand experience in the practical application of
the Superfund law (CERCLA), its implementing
regulations (the NCP), and relevant EPAguidance
and policy. With the aid of this case study,
Superfund professionals understand not only
what must be done but why.
The session starts Monday, November 4,
and will continue through Friday, November 8.
To enroll OSCs and RPMs in the November
session, contact Marlene Suit, U.S. EPA
Technology Innovation Office, OS-110W,
Washington DC, 20460. FTS 398-8847 or
telephone (703) 308-8847 (after November
15, FTS prefix changes to 478).
-------
The CEC's curriculum continues to expand with a series of
specialized training topics. These sessions will enable participants
to acquire specific training in Federal facilities enforcement,
treatment technologies (including innovative technologies),
hydrogeology, and CERCLA's relationship to other laws, to mention
a few. The illustration below shows the possible progress through
the CEC for both entry-level and experienced Superfund professionals.
OSCorRPM
Expnncad 0C>. RFMi.
or Otter MM «mi SUB
WHAT IS THE CEC'S AUDIENCE?
The CEC is intended primarily for OSCs, RPMs, and other
EPA staff involved in the Superfund program. OSCs, RPMs, and
other environmental professionals with less than six months
experience in the Superfund program must begin with the
Fundamentals of Superfund training. Once the Fundamentals
course has been completed they, like their more experienced
counterparts, can take advantage of the CEC's tiered training
approach to design a curriculum most suited to their individual
requirements.
TIO has also designed the CECto be available to environmental
professionals in other Federal agencies and the States. Environmental
professionals frequently interact with EPA OSCs and RPMs
during complex site management tasks. The CEC provides an
opportunity to gain a thorough understanding of the Superfund
process.
WHERE WILL CEC BE HELD?
The CEC will begin in November 1991 at North Carolina State
University (NC State) in Raleigh-Durham, North Carolina. In
January 1992, the CEC will continue at NC State for one week on
a monthly basis. State-of-the-art training techniques and facilities
will be used to ensure that maximum training effectiveness is
achieved. Innovativetraining concepts such as interactive videos,
computer-based training, and multimedia presentations will create
variety in the way training is delivered. Advanced telecommunications
capabilities at NC State will enable participation in CEC courses
from other locations. After a six-month trial period, TIO will
analyze the CEC's effectiveness to determine the feasibility of
establishing the CEC at a second location.
TENTATIVE
CEC SCHEDULE
November: Fundamentals of
Superfund
January: Enforcement
Remedial Response
February: Enforcement
Community Relations
Removal Response
March: Fundamentals of
Superfund
Community Relations
Remedial Response
April: Federal Facilities
Enforcement*
Risk Assessment*
Superfund's Relationship
to Other Laws
May: Enforcement
Community Relations
Treatment Technologies
June: Fundamentals of
Superfund
Remedial Response
Removal Response
July: Hydrogeology
Risk Assessment*
Superfund's Relationship
to Other Laws
'These courses are being developed.
TO OBTAIN MORE INFORMATION
or to enroll in the CEC, contact Marlene
Suit, U.S. EPA Technology Innovation
Office, OS-110W, Washington DC, 20460,
FTS 398-8847 or 703-308-8847 (after
November 15, FTS prefix changes to 478).
-------
KEY PERSONNEL IN SUPERFUND CONTRACT MANAGEMENT |
Contract
REM
ARCS
ERGS
TAT
TCS
ESAT
Headquarters
(PO.DPOif posstote)
REM 1 & II - Tracy Lay
EMAIL5201, 678-8349
REM III & IV - Steve Chang
EMAIL5644, 678-6348
REM IV - Florence Blair
EMAIL5241, 678-8327
BflZobd
EMAIL5516, 678-6354
Barbara McOonough
EMAIL5236, 678-8347
Zone 1 - Patricia Tidwel
EMAIL5216, 260-2668
Zone 1 - Pat Hawkins
EMAIL5191. 260-2458
Zone 2 - Karen Tombnatsu
EMAIL30026, 260-9861
Zone 1 - Jack Jojokian
EMAIL , 676-8650
Zone 2 - Jean Wright
EMAIL . 678-8659
Zone 3 - Mariene Lemro
EMAIL . 678-8639
Zone 4 - Nancy Deck
EMAIL . 678-8647
Terry Simpson, Actg. PO
EMAIL93018, 260-8607
Zone 1 - Reg. 1 ,2,3, & 5
Zone 2 - Reg. 4,6,10, &
HQs
Region 1
Nancy Baimakian
833-1797, EMAIL9170
Mail Code HCP-CAN7
JFK Federal Building
Boston, MA 02203
Nancy Barmakian
833-1797, EMAIL9170
Diane Keley
833-1672, EMAIL5236
Mail Code HCP-CAN7
JFK Federal Building
Boston, MA 02203
John Carlson
617-860-4624, EMAIL9161
New England Regional Lab
60Westview Street
Lexington. MA 021 73
John Carlson
828-6624, EMAIL9119
JFK Federal Building
Boston, MA 02203
Rick Leighton
833-1654, EMAIL9156
JFK Federal Building
Boston, MA 02203
Scott dflord
828-6631, EMAIL9161
60Westview Street
Lexington, MA 021 73
Region 2
ShaheerAM
264-2221, EMAIL9204
26 Federal Plaza
New York, NY 10278
Jl Hacker
264-4197, EMAIL
Fernando Rosado
264-6130, EMAIL9171
Keith Koter
264-1576, EMAIL
Keith Montino
264-9300, EMAIL
26 Federal Plaza
New York. NY 10278
Norm Vogelsang
342-4346, EMAIL9283
Lisa Guameri
340-6108, EMAIL9490
2890 Woodbridge Ave.
Edison, NJ 08837
Lisa Ckiameki
340-6180, EMAIL
2890 Woodbridge Avenue
Edison, NJ 08837
Cathy Moyik
264-8123, EMAIL9206
Erwin Sieszek
264-4311, EMAIL
26 Federal Plaza
New York, NY 10278
Joseph Hudek
340-6713, EMAIL9252
Woodbridge
Raritan Depot-Bldg. 209
Region 3
James McKenzie
597-3229, EMAIL93035
841 Chestnut Street
Philadelphia, PA 19107
Elaine Spiewak
597-3229, EMAIL
James McKenzie
597-3229, EMAIL93035
841 Chestnut Street
Philadelphia. PA 19107
Rich Fetzer
597-1389. EMAIL9324
Mail Code 3HW30
841 Chestnut Street
Philadelphia, PA 19107
Charfe Kleeman
597-4018. EMAIL9340
841 Chestnut Street
Phildelphia, PA 19107
Donna MoGowan
597-8230, EMAIL
841 Chestnut Street
Philadelphia, PA 19107
Cindy Caporale, Actg.
PO
652-2138, EMAIL
839 Bestgate Road
Annapolis, MD 21401
Region 4
KenMyer
257-2930, EMAIL
345 Courtland St., N.E.
Atlanta, GA 30365
MattRobbhs
257-2930, EMAIL9428
Doug Thompson
257-2234. EMAIL
Charles Swan
257-2234, EMAIL
345 Courtland St., N.E.
Atlanta, GA 30365
Colette Bolts
257-2930, EMAIL
345 Courtland St.. N.E.
Atlanta, GA 30365
Sharon Camp
257-2930. EMAIL
345 Courtland St., N.E.
Atlanta. GA 30365
Ken Meyer
257-2930, EMAIL
345 Courtland St., N.E.
Atlanta, GA 30365
Bobby Carrol
250-3309, EMAIL9434
College Station Road,
ASB
Athens, GA 30613
Page 1
March 24,1992
-------
KEY PERSONNEL IN SUPERFUND CONTRACT MANAGEMENT |
Contract
REM
ARCS
ERGS
TAT
TES
ESAT
Region 5
GalNabasny
353-1056. EMAIL95019
230 South Dearborn St.
Chicago. IL 60604
Steven Nathan
886-5496, EMAIL95019
PatVogtman
886-5496, EMAIL95021
CariNonnan
886-5496. EMAIL95020
230 South Dearborn St.
Chicago. IL 60604
Charles Brasher
353-7625, EMAIL
230 South Dearborn St.
Chicago. IL 60604
Duane Heaton
353-1788. EMAIL
230 South Dearborn St.
Chicago, IL
TES 10 - Gal Nabasny
353-1056, EMAIL95019
TES 9 - Eva Howard
886-7274, EMAIL95019
230 South Dearborn St.
Chicago, IL 60604
JayThakkar
886-1972, EMAIL
Mail Code 5SCRL
77 W. Jackson Blvd.
Chicago, IL 60605
Region 6
TomOiver
255-2240, EMAIL
1445 Ross Avenue
Dallas, TX 75202
Cartene Chambers or
Eve Boss
255-6720,
EMAIL9698
1445 Ross Avenue
Mail Code 6E-E
Dallas. TX 75202
JoAnn Woods
255-2270,
EMAIL9625
1445 Ross Avenue
Dallas, TX 75202
Chris Peterson
255-2277,
EMAIL9625
1445 Ross Avenue
Dallas, TX 75202
Karen Written
255-6720, EMAIL
1445 Ross Avenue
Dallas, TX 75270
Michael Daggett
730-2107, EMAIL
10625 Fallstone
Houston, TX 77099
Region 7
Karen Floumoy
276-7782. EMAIL9722
726 Minnesota Avenue
Kansas City, KS 66101
Debi Moray
276-7593, EMAIL9733
726 Minnesota Avenue
Kansas City, KS 66101
Larry Stafford
276-5102, EMAIL9789
25 Funston Road
Kansas City, KS 66115
PaulDoherty
276-5008. EMAIL9783
726 Minnesota Avenue
Kansas City, KS 66101
Maureen Hunt
276-7722, EMAIL
Nancy Heaty
276-7713, EMAIL
Aaron Zimmerman
276-7333, EMAIL
726 Minnesota Avenue
Kansas City, KS 66101
Harold Brown
276-5127. EMAIL9784
726 Minnesota Avenue
Kansas City, KS 66101
Region 8
Gregg Hargreaves
330-1061,
EMAIL9832
999 18th Street
Denver, CO 80202
Jeff Mashburn
330-7156,
EMAIL98002
Gregg Hargreaves
330-1061.
EMAIL9832
999 18th Street
Denver, CO 80202
Mice Zimmerman
564-1723,
EMAIL9873
Mail Code 8HWN-ER
999 18th Street
Denver, CO 80202
Karen Mooar
330-7063. EMAIL
999 18th Street
Denver, CO 80202
Sam Marquez
330-7151,
EMAIL9826
999 18th Street
Denver, CO 80202
Steve Caio
330-1056,
EMAIL98014
999 18th Street
Denver, CO 80202
Region 9
Rob Stem
484-2339, EMAIL99039
75 Hawthorne Street
San Francisco, CA 94103
Rob Stem
484-2339, EMAIL99039
MattMitguard
484-2335, EMAIL2333
Sherry Nkzat
484-9984, EMAIL99103
Doug Frazier
484-2338. EMAIL99173
75 Hawthorne Street
San Francisco. CA 94103
Chris Weden
484-2291, EMAIL99026
75 Hawthorne Street
San Francisco, CA 94103
VvUam Lewis
484-2292, EMAIL99086
Mail Code T-4-8
75 Hawthorne Street
San Francisco, CA 94103
JudyWaker
484-2334, EMAIL
Mail Code T-4-8
75 Hawthorne Street
San Francisco, CA 94103
Terry Stumph
484-1522, EMAIL9957
Mail Code P-3
75 Hawthorne Street
San Francisco, CA 94103
Region 10
Joanne LaBaw
399-2594,
EMAIL9069
1200 6th Street
Seattle, WA 98101
Joanne LaBaw
399-2594.
EMAIL9069
12006th Street
Seattle. WA 98101
WBam Longston
399-1679.
EMAIL9043
1200 6th Street
Mail Code HW093
Seattle, WA 98101
Chris Held
399- . EMAIL
1200 6th Street
Seattle, WA 98101
Mice Slater
399-0455. EMAIL
1200 6th Street
Seattle. WA 98101
Gerald Muth
390-1282. EMAIL
7411 Beach Drive
Port Orchard. WA
98366
March 24. iaa?
-------
ATTACHMENT
BASIC PROJECT OFFICER COURSE
FY 1992 SCHEDULE
LOCATION
DATE
POINT OF CONTACT
Washington
Research Triangle
Park, NC
Cincinnati. OH
Ann Arbor, MI
Region II
(New York, NY)
Region III
(Philadelphia. PA)
Jan. 28 - 31
Feb. 11-14
Feb. 25 - 28
March 17- 20
April 21 - 24
May 12 - 15
June 23 - 26
July 21 -24
July 28 - 31
Aug. 11-14
May 5-8
June 2-5
July 14- 17
April 7 - 10
July 21-24
April 21 - 24
July 21 -24
May 19 - 22
Aug. 25 - 28
Tina Scott
The Federal Group, Inc.
3918 Prosperity Ave.
Fairfax, VA 22031
(703)204-4660
Kay Harward
EPA - Personnel (MD 29)
(FTS) 629-4350
Jessica Barron
EPA - Personnel
26 W. M. L. King Drive
Cincinnati. OH 45268
(FTS) 684-7807
Jeanine Heinrich
EPA - M.V.E. Lab.
2565 Plymouth Road
Ann Arbor. MI 48105
(FTS) 374-8220
Vicky Borkowsky
EPA - Region II
26 Federal Plaza
New York, N.Y. 10278
(FTS) 264-1760
Monica Maio
EPA - Region III (3PM-42)
841 Chestnut Street
Philadelphia. PA 19107
(FTS) 597-1899
-------
LOCATION
DATE
POINT OF CONTACT
Region IV
(Atlanta, GA)
June 9-12
Aug. 4-7
Region V
(Chicago, ID
April 28 - May 1
Region VI
(Dallas, TX)
May 19 - 22
July 14 - 17
Region VII
(Kansas City, KS)
Aug. 18-21
Region VIII
Penver, CO)
June 9-12
Region DC
(San Francisco, CA)
May 12 - 15
Region X
(Seattle, WA)
July 28 - 31
Ralph Armstrong
EPA - Region IV
Personnel
345 Courtland St., NE
Atlanta, GA 30365
(FTS) 257-3486
Pat Easley
EPA - Region V
230 S. Dearborn Street
Chicago, IL 60604
(FTS) 886-7535
Cindy Singletary
EPA - Region VI (6M-AP)
1445 Ross Avenue
Dallas, TX 75270
(FTS) 255-6560
Marian Hess
EPA - Region VII
726 Minnesota Avenue
Kansas City, KS 66101
(FTS) 276-7041
Pat Smedley
EPA - Region VIII
999 18th Street, Suite 500
Denver, CO 80202-2413
(FTS) 330-1404
Maria Lesley
EPA - Region DC
75 Hawthorne St.
San Francisco, CA 94105
(FTS) 484-1544
Diane RuthrufF
EPA - Region X
1200 Sixth Avenue
Seattle, WA 98101
(FTS) 399-5139
-------
ATTACHMENT
CONTRACT ADMINSTRATION
FY 92 SCHEDULE
LOCATION
Washington. D.C.
North Conference
Center (Near WIC)
Room #3
Cincinnati, Ohio
Gulf Breeze, FL
Athens. GA
Research Triangle Park,
North Carolina
DATES
Oct 01-03
Nov. 05 - 07
Dec. 03 - 05
Jan. 07 - 09
Feb. 04-06
Mar. 03 - 05
Apr. 07 - 09
May 05 - 07
June 02-04
July 07 - 09
Aug. 04 - 06
Sep. 01 - 03
Oct. 08 - 10
*Oct. 11
Apr. 07-09
•Apr. 10
Mar. 31 -Apr. 2
•Apr. 3
May 12 - 14
••May 15
Dec. 03 - 05
•Dec. 06
Apr. 21-23
•Apr. 24
POINT OF CONTACT
Shirley Green, EPA
Training Operations Branch
Institute Division, OHRM
(PM-224) (202) 260-2594
Al Anderson, EPA Personnel
26 W. Martin Luther King Dr.
Cincinnati, OH 45268
FTS 8 -684-7823
Connie Shoemaker
Environmental Research
Laboratory (ORD)
Sabine Island
Gulf Breeze. FL 32561-5299
FTS 8-220-9200
Maxine Kellum
Environmental Research
Laboratory (ORD)
College Station Road
Athens, GA 30613
FTS 8-250-3134
Millard Thacker and
KayHarward
U.S. EPA (MD-29)
Res. Triangle Park, NC 27711
FTS 8-629-4356 and
6.°.9-4350
• Supervisors Course
•* Re-Certification Course
-------
CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION
FT 92 SCHEDULE (Cont'd)
LOCATION
Ann Arbor, MI
Las Vegas, NV
Region I
(Boston, MA)
Region II
(New York, NY)
Region III
(Philadelphia, PA)
Region IV
(Atlanta, GA)
Region V
(Chichago, ID
DATES
Sep. 15 - 17
•Sep. 18
June 16 -18
•June 19
May 10 - 12
•May 13
July 14 - 16
•July 17
Feb. 11-13
•Feb. 14
Jan. 14 - 17
•Jan. 18
Apr. 21-23
•Apr. 24
Sep. 01 - 03
•Sep. 04
Feb. 11-13
•Feb. 14
Jan. 28 - 30
•Jan. 31
Aug. 11-13
•Aug. 14
POINT OF CONTACT
Jeanine Heinrlch
U.S. EPA - M.V.E. Lab
2565 Plymouth Road
Ann Arbor. MI 48105
FTS 8-374-8220
Llzabeth Cervera-Iler, EPA
P.O. Box 98516
Las Vegas. NV 89193-8516
FTS 8-545-2404
Pauline Callahan
EPA - Region I
J.F.K. Federal Bldg.
Boston, MA 02203
FTS 8-835-3624
Vicky Borkowsky
EPA - Region II
26 Federal Plaza
New York, NY 10278
FTS 8-264-1760
Monica Maio
EPA - Region III (3PM-42)
841 Chestnut Building
Philadelphia, PA 19107
FTS 8-597-1899
Ralph Armstrong
EPA-Region IV
345 Courtland Street, N.E.
Atlanta. GA 30365
FTS 8-257-3486
Patricia E?.sley
EPA - Region V (5MP)
230 South Dearborn Street
Chicago, IL 60604
FTS 8-886-7535
* Supervisors Course
-------
ATTACHMENT
CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION
FT 92 SCHEDULE (Cont'd)
LOCATION
Region VI
Pallas, TX)
Region VII
(Kansas City, KS)
Region VIII
penver, CO)
Region IX
(San Francisco, CA)
Region X
(Seattle, WA)
DATES
Nov. 05 - 07
•Nov. 08
May 05 - 07
•May 08
May 19 - 21
•May 22
Oct. 29-31
•Nov. 01
Jan. 07-09
•Jan. 10
July 21-23
•July 24
Mar. 17 - 19
•Mar 20
POINT OF CONTACT
Cindy Singletary
EPA - Region VI
1445 Ross Avenue. 12th Floor
Dallas. TX 75202
FTS 8-255-6560
Marian Hess
EPA-Region VII
726 Minnesota Avenue
Kansas City, KS 66101
FTS 8-276-7041
Pat Smedley
EPA-Region VHI
999 18th Street. Suite 500
Denver. CO 80202-2405
FTS 8-330-1404
Maria Lesley
EPA - Region IX
75 Hawthorne Steet
San Francisco, CA 94105
FTS 8-484-1544
Diane Ruthrufif
EPA - Region X
1200 Sixth Avenue
Seattle. WA 98101
FTS 8-399-7844
HEADQUARTERS SCHEDULE
for
FT 92/SUPERVISORS & MANAGERS
North Conference
Center, Room #3
(Near WIC)
Oct. 04
Nov. 08
Dec. 06
Jan. 10
Feb. 07
Shirley Green (PM-224)
EPA Institute Division
401 M Street. S.W.
Washington. D.C. 20460
(202) 260-2594
Supervisors Course
-------
CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION
FY 92 SCHEDULE (Cont'd)
HEADQUARTERS SCHEDULE
FY 92/SUPERVISORS & MANAGER fCont'dl
Mar. 06
Apr. 10
May 08
June 05
July 10
Aug. 07
Sep. 04
------- |