oEPA
               United States
               Environmental Protection
               Agency
            Office of
            Solid Waste and
            Emergency Response
DIRECTIVE NUMBER: 9445.02(84)

TITLE: Topics Relating to-RCRA Methodology and Quality
     Assurance (QA) Activities
                APPROVAL DATE: 4-23-84

                EFFECTIVE DATE: *-23-84

                ORIGINATING OFFICE: offlce of Solid Waate

                E FINAL

                D DRAFT

                 STATUS:
            t 1
    A- Pending OMB approval
t  ]  B- Pending AA-OSWER approval
[  3  C- For revlev 4/or comment
[  ]  D- In development or circulating
                REFERENCE (other documents):
                         headquarters
  OSWER      OSWER      OSWER
VE   DIRECTIVE   DIRECTIVE    Dl

-------
PART 261  -  APPENDICES                                       DOC:  9445.02(84)


Key Words:    EP Toxicity Test, QA/QC, Analytic Methods

Regulations:

Subject:      Topics Relating to RCRA Methodology and Quality Assurance (QA)
              Activities

Addressee:    N/C

Originator:   David Friedman, Manager, Methods Program

Source Doc:   #9445.02(84)  '

Date:         4-23-84

Summary:

EP Toxicity Test

     The EP toxicity test requires that pH measurements be made only with a pH
meter.  Frequent calibration of the pH meter is important; pH strips are not
accurate enough and must not be used.

     All extracts must be digested before analyses, unless it was demonstrated,
on similar samples, that digestion is not necessary.  All metal test methods in
SW-846 require this.

     According to the EP toxicity test procedures, a representative sample of
the material tested must be prepared for extraction by crushing, cutting, or
grinding it into pieces which can pass through a 9.5 mm sieve.

     In rare cases, manufactured articles with material inside which presents
an environmental problem, but which is encased in a leak-resistant, non-
destructible container that is an appropriate size, may be tested without
being cut-up pursuant to the Structural Integrity Procedure.

     The Agency has not yet developed standardized EP toxicity test procedures
for structurally strong articles such as batteries which do not disintegrate
after disposal.

-------
                                                             9445.02~( 8"4T
                                               RE:  WCBFR0136


MEMORANDUM

SUBJECTi  Notes on RCRA "Methodology and QA Activities

PROMj     David Friedman
          Manager
          Methods Program  (WH-S65B)

TOt       Addressees

     This menorandum  is an  attempt to  assist  regional,  state
and other interested  persons  in keeping abreast of Agency
RCHA methodology and-Quality  Assurance activities.  I plan  to
send out these brief  memo ran'I 
-------

 ,P Toxiclty Test
/
 Adjustment o f  pH

      Recently,  differences in the results of lead analyses
 between  two  laboratories  resulted in the discovery of a
 problem  in execution of  the EP Toxicity Test.  Upon examination,
 by the Quality Assurance  Officer for Region VI, it was determined
 that  pH  adjustment  was  bein-j performed using pH paper and
 not with a PH  aoter.  Tne E? tost is especially sensitive to
 pH adjustment  and  for that reason the method requires that pH
 measurements be made only with a pH meter.  The pH strips
 are not  accurate enough  *nd must not be used.  In addition,
 frequent calibration of  tho pH meter is important.  (See
 SW-846 "Tost Methods  for  Evaluation Solid Waste," Method
 1310, Step 7.13.1.)
      »
 Extract  Digestion

      Please  remenbec  that all extracts must be digested
 prior to analysis  unless  it has been demonstrated, on similar
 samples, that  d-iges'tion  is not necessary.  All metal test
 methods  in SW-346  explicitly require this (see, for example,
 Method 7040, Step  1.0).

 Testing  Manufactured  Articles
                 T
      The EP  toxicity  test procedure requires that a representative
 sample of the  material  be prepared for extraction by crushing,
 cutting  or grinding into  pioces which can pass through a 9.5
 mm sieve.

      The difficulty arises with manufactured articles when
 the natorial  Inside is  an onvironraental problem but is encased
 in a  leak resistant container designed to be structurally
 resistant to crushing,  cutting or grinding.  In rare cases where
 such  products  are  an  appropriate size, they may be tested
 without  being  cut-up  pursuant to the Structural Integrity
 Procedure.

      Although  sone batteries tend to degrade rapidly when
 placed in a  landfill, certain batteries are manufactured in
 such  a manner  as  to prevent disintegration after disposal.
 However, at  this time the Ayency has not developed standardized,
 EP toxicity  test procedures for structurally strong articles
 such  as  batteries.  EPA is considering proposing amendments
 to the E? Toxicity test which would allow a package designed
 to be structurally resistant to crushing, cutting, or'grinding
 to be evaluated in the  EP Toxicity test without being cut-up.
 One possibility would be to test the corrosion resistance of
 structurally resistant  articles by submerging tha article  in

-------
a 1M salt (HaCl) water solution at an elevated temperature
(60*-30*) for a period of one month.  If no leaks occur the
product can be considered corrosion resistant.   -  ^.

     I would appreciate hearing about any other  suggestions you
may have with respect to this issue.  We hope to be able to develop
a proposed amendment package in the near future.

Methods Evaluation

     The Agency has Initiated an extensive research program
to determine the accuracy and precision of methods currently
in SW-846.  At the present tine, the following methods are
being evaluated.

            1110  Corrosivity Toward Steol
            1120  Polarization Resistance Method
            3030  Acid Digestion of Oils, Greases, or Waxes
            3040  Dissolution Procedure for Oils,  Greases, or Waxes
            3050  Acid Digestion of Sludges
            3010' Acid Digestion Procedure for Flame Atomic
                     Absorption Spectroscopy
            3020  Acid Digestion for Furnace Atoaic Absorption
                     Spec tro 9 copy
            7190  Chroraiun: Acoraic Absorption, Direct Aspiration
            7191  Chromium: Atomic Absorption, Furnace Method
            7195  Hexavalent Chromium: Coprecipitation
            7196  Hexavalent Chroniuw: Cblorisietric
            7197  Hexavalant Chromium: Chelation - Extraction
            7198  Hexavalent Chromium: Differential Pulse
                     Polarography Method
          t XXXX  Hexavalent Chromium: Ion Chroroatography

Method Development

     Our efforts continue with rsapect to the devolopsent of
additional methods for identifying hazardous wastas.  Protocols
are being developed or existing methodology is being modified
to address the following areast

          Ignitable Solids
            *
                  The objective is to develop methods for
               use in the da f In it ion. of  ignitable  solids.
               Protocols have been developed and subjected
               to single Ivr^ratory evaluation using actual
               waste samples.  Test have b

-------
                               -4-
          Hazards Posod by  Liquids with Flash Points belov 60*C
                  The objective  is to- develop a ainple test
               for identifying  those liquids that should
               not be considered as hazardous even though
               they will flash  at a temperature balow 60*C.
               Many such materials will not sustain combustion
               nor release  sufficient ataounts of energy to
               surrounding  materials to spread the fire.
               The evaluation report of this method is also
               scheduled to be  prepared and available for
               regional review  and comment by the end of
               1934.

          Reactive Gases -  Cyanide and Sulfide
                  The objective  is to develop a method for
               determining  when  a waste is a reactive waste
               (40 CPR 261.33)  by reason of potential H2S or
               HCN release.  A  method has been evaluated
               using standards  and actual waste samples.
               Tie test method  is expected to be available for
               Regional review  and cotncaent by June of 1984.
               Work is also progressing on establishing
               reactive waste definition thresholds using
               the oethod.   while it looks like it works
               acceptably woll  for sulfide-boaring wastes,
               further method refining will be necessary
               before it can bo adopted for cyanides.


Haste Analysis Plans Guidance Manual

     Under Section 3004 of  RCRA, EPA promulgated standards
applicable to owners and operators of hazardous waste management
facilities.  These standards govern the issuance of permits
for facilities that treat,  store, or dispose of hazardous
waste.  OSW is currently developing permit Guidance Manuals
to describe the permit application process and to provide
guidance to applicants and permit writers in addressing  the
information requirements.

     As part of the permit application, owners/operators aro
required to submit a Waste Analysis Plan.  The requirement
for a Waste Analysis Plan is to insure that owners or operators
possess sufficient information  on the properties of wastes
so that they will be able to treat, store, or dispose of the
waste in a manner which will not pose a threat to human
health or the environment.

     To assist permit applicants and State and EPA  staff     ~~^
members who review applications and draw up periaits,  the
Office of Solid Waste is in the process of preparing  a  Waste
Analysis Plan Guidance Manual.   This Manual will provide
specific guidance on how to comply with the general waste

-------
analysis requirements of 40 CFR 264.13.  The Manual will
include a discussion of the Wasta Analysis Plan requirements,
model waste Analysis Plans for each of the principal waste
disposal management situations, and'a checklist for reviewers
to use in evaluating permit applications.  We anticipate     .
that a draft of this manual will be available for Regional
review early in Spring 1984.                             '  .."
                                             * *
Reference Standards •  •

     Since 1930, EPA1a Office of Research and Development
has maintained and continues to expand an inventory of standard
compounds for use in analytical efforts.

     Organic standards consist of either s ingle-component
solutions (for instrunent calibration) or raulti-conponent
solutions, containing several chomicals.  Analytical reference
standards can be utilized in several ways to enhance sample
analysis and quality control.  Reference standards can bet

   '  •  added tso media before analysis to check recoveries
        and thus bo used as .3 matrix spike;

     *  added to a sample which has been prepared for
        instrumental analysis, and thus be used as an internal
        standard;

     •  used as a surrogate for a particular compound allowing
        for both sample analysis and recovery verification to
        be done in the sama run, e.g., deuterated or fluorinated
        standards can  thus bo used as surrogates for compounds
        found in hazardous waste.

     •  used for instrunent calibration.

     A single source of standard chemicals of known purity
and reference materials is necessary to assure that data of
known quality are produced.  The Quality Assurance Materials
Bank provides reference standards to analytical laboratories
to support the Agency's pro j rams for no ni to ring hazardous
waste (RCRA/ CERCLA).  Pure ("neat") compounds ara- purchased
and analyzed and low purity compounds are purified.  Once
verified, high purity organic and inorganic  standards are
prepared (standard solutions) and distributed for use by
laboratories in calibration of instruments and for quality
control in sample analysis.  The purity, concentration,
stability and applicability of each standard is evaluated by
the QA Materials Bank.  For information regarding the availability
of specific standards  contact Ed Kantor at BMSL-LV (702-798-2690j
PTS545-2690), Ed Berg  at EMSL-Cinn (513-684-7325; FTS-684-7325),
or Florence Richardson at the office of Solid Waste (202-382-4301;
FTS-382-4801).       ~'                                    '

-------