EPA-600/2-76-139
   May 1976
Environmental Protection Technology Series
TREATMENT  OF DENIM  TEXTILE MILL  WASTEWATERS:
                 NEUTRALIZATION  AND COLOR REMOVAL
                                     Industrial Environmental Research Laboratory
                                          Office of Research and Development
                                         U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
                                    Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711

-------
                RESEARCH REPORTING SERIES

 Research reports of the Office of Research and Development. U.S. Environmental
 Protection Agency, have been grouped into five series. These five broad
 categories were established to facilitate further development and application of
 environmental technology. Elimination of traditional grouping was consciously
 planned to foster technology transfer and a maximum interface in related fields.
 The five series are:
     1.    Environmental Health Effects Research
     2.    Environmental Protection Technology
     3.    Ecological Research
     4.    Environmental Monitoring
     5.    Socioeccnomic Environmental Studies

 This report  has been assigned to the ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
 TECHNOLOGY series. This series describes research performed to develop and
 demonstrate instrumentation, equipment, and methodology to repair or prevent
 environmental degradation from point and non-point sources of pollution. This
 work provides  the new or improved  technology required for the control and
 treatment of pollution sources to meet environmental quality standards.
                     EPA REVIEW NOTICE

-"'This report has been reviewed by  the U.S.  Environmental
 Protection Agency, and approved for publication.  Approval
 does not signify that the contents necessarily reflect the
 views  and policy of the Agency, nor does mention of trade
 names or  commercial products constitute endorsement or
 recommendation for use.
 This document is available to the public through the National Technical Informa-
 tion Service, Springfield, Virginia 22161.

-------
                                      EPA-600/2-76-139

                                      May 1976
           TREATMENT  OF DENIM

      TEXTILE  MILL  WASTEWATERS:

NEUTRALIZATION AND COLOR REMOVAL
                        by

    Charles R. Froneberger and Michael J. Pollock
         R. S. Noonan, Inc.  of South Carolina
             Greenville, South Carolina

                        for
             Canton Textile Mills, Inc.
                   P.O. Box 827
               Canton, Georgia  30114


                 Grant No. S800852
               ROAPNo. 21AZT-006
           Program Element No. 1BB036
      EPA Project Officer: Thomas N. Sargent

    Industrial Environmental Research Laboratory
      Office of Energy, Minerals, and Industry
         Research Triangle Park, NC  27711
                   Prepared for

   U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
         Office of Research and Development
               Washington, DC 20460

-------
                                CONTENTS
List of Figures                                                     jv

List of Tables                                                     yl

Acknowledgements                                                    IX


SECTIONS

I         Conclusions                                                1

II        Recommendations                                            3

III       Introduction                                               5

IV        Fly Ash Adsorption of Color                               19

V   "      Chemical Destabilization for Removal of Color             43

VI        Neutralization of Caustic Wastewaters Utilizing           63
          Coal-Fired Boiler Flue Gases

VII       References                                                89

VIII      Appendix                                                  93
                                    iii

-------
                                   FIGURES

Number                                                            Page

  1    Canton Textile Mills, Inc.'s manufacturing process            7
       flow diagram

  2    Flow diagram of indigo dyeing process                         8

  3    Flow diagram of sulfur dyeing process                        10

  4    Flow diagram of Canton Textile Mills, Inc.'s                 14
       existing wastewater treatment facility

  5    Flow diagram of Canton Textile Mills, Inc.'s up-             16
       graded wastewater treatment facility

  6    Canton Textile Mills, Inc.'s upgraded wastewater             17
       treatment facility

  7    Fly ash adsorption isotherm with existing effluent           24

  8    Fly ash adsorption isotherm with prefiltered efflu-          25
       ent

  9    Powdered activated carbon isotherm with prefiltered          26
       effluent

 10    Gravity feed, packed-bed fly ash contacting flow             27
       diagram

 11    Pressurized packed-bed fly ash contacting flow               30
       diagram

 12    Pressurized packed-bed fly ash test apparatus                31

 13    Expanded-bed fly ash contacting flow diagram                 33

 14    Buchner Funnel test apparatus                                55

 15    Filter leaf test apparatus                                   55

 16    Flow diagram of treatment system with proposed               58
       chemical coagulation system addition

 17    Neutralization pilot plant                                   68

 18    Pilot plant effluent pH versus liquid/gas ratio              69

 19    FMC/Link-Belt variable throat scrubber                       73
                                  iv

-------
                               FIGURES (Cont'd)

Number                            ,                                 Page

 20    Process flow diagram of scrubber installation                74

 21    Distant view of Canton Textile Mills, Inc.'s scrubber        75
       installation

 22    Close-up view of Canton Textile Mills, Inc.'s                76
       scrubber installation
 23    Percent S02 removal versus pH of scrubbing liquid
84
                                   v

-------
                                    TABLES

Number                                                             Page

  1    Characterization of dye wastewaters                          11

  2    Typical profile of influent wastewater to the                12
       treatment system

  3    Profile of existing treatment system's influent-             13
       effluent wastewater characteristics

  4    Profile of upgraded treatment system's influent-             18
       effluent wastewater characteristics

  5    Typical analysis of Canton Textile Mills' fly ash            20

  6    Typical adsorption isotherm data                             23

  7    Typical results of fly ash packed-column tests with          29
       prefiltered effluent

  8    Typical packed-bed fly ash test results                      32

  9    Results of fly ash expanded-bed test with prefil-            34
       tered effluent

 10    Fly ash slurry contact test results with unfiltered          36
       effluent

 11    Fly ash slurry test results with prefiltered-                37
       effluent

 12    Effect of pH on adsorption capacity of fly ash               38

 13    Effect of temperature on the adsorption capacity of          39
       fly ash

 14    Powdered activated carbon slurry contact results             40

 15    Summary of phase one jar test investigations                 46

 16    Average results of successful jar tests on existing          47
       wastewater treatment plant effluent

 17    Sludge characterization                                      48

 18    Summary of alum sludge reduction investigations              49
                                 vi

-------
                                TABLES (Cont'd)

Number                                                             Page

 19    Typical results of alum regeneration-coagulation             50
       investigation

 20    Relative economics of alum regeneration                      51

 21    Results of filter leaf tests with sludge generated           56
       from lime-Dow A-23 coagulation

 22    Estimated capital costs of chemical coagulation              59
       system addition to Canton Textile Mills, Inc.'s
       existing biological treatment facility

 23    Projected operating and maintenance costs of exist-          60
       ing biological and new chemical coagulation system

 24    Typical profile of existing stack gas                        66

 25    Wastewater characterization across pilot scrubber            71

 26    Typical results of various scrubber operating con-           7,9
       ditions

 27    Typical wastewater characterization across full              81
       scale scrubber

 28    Comparative wastewater treatment characterization            83
       with and without scrubber neutralization of dyeing
       process wastewaters

 29    Capital and operating costs of scrubber system               86

 Al    Design data for existing wastewater facilities               94

 A2    Design data for upgraded wastewater treatment                95
       facilities

 A3    Packed column reactor test with unfiltered ef-               96
       fluent

 A4    Packed column reactor test with prefiltered ef-              97
       fluent

 A5    Typical jar test procedures                                  98

 A6    Buchner Funnel test procedure                                99
                                    vii

-------
                                TABLES (Cont'd)

Number                                                             Page

 A7    Results of Buchner Funnel tests with sludge gen-            100
       erated from alum coagulation

 A8    Results of Buchner Funnel tests With sludge gen-            101
       erated with lime coagulation

 A9    Results of Buchner Funnel tests with sludge gen-            102
       erated with magnesium  carbonate and lime coagu-
       lation

A10    Results of Buchner Funnel tests with sludge gen-            103
       erated with lime-Dow A-23 coagulation

All    Typical coal  analysis
                                   viii

-------
                               ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The research reported herein is a combined effort of Canton Textile
Mills, Inc. of Canton, Georgia and R. S. Noonan, Inc. of South Carolina,
Greenville, South Carolina  (Consulting Engineers).

The cooperation and assistance of Mr. T. E. Brumbeloe, Mr. J. C. Gray,
Mr. J. T. Holbrook, Mr. L.  G. Hobgood, and the maintenance staff of
Canton Textile Mills, Inc., are gratefully acknowledged.

The cooperation of the FMC  Corporation, the Duriron Company, Inc., and
the Allis-Chalmers Company  in providing equipment for the experimental
scrubber phase of this project are gratefully acknowledged.

The technical assistance and support of the project by the United
States Environmental Protection Agency and Mr. T. N. Sargent, the
Grant Project Officer, are  acknowledged with sincere thanks.
                                   ix

-------
                               SECTION I

                              CONCLUSIONS
Over a forty-four month period, a study was .conducted to investigate the
use of fly ash adorption and chemical destabilization techniques of color
removal from indigo and sulfur dyeing wastewaters.  This investigation
also included a feasibility study and subsequent full scale demonstra-
tion of coal-fired boiler flue gas wet scrubbing techniques for neu-
tralization of caustic wastewaters.

Based on the results of these studies conducted at Canton Textile
Mills, Inc., Canton, Georgia, the following conclusions have been
reached:

1.   The fly ash generated in Canton Textile Mills, Inc.'s coal-
     fired boiler is capable of adsorption and subsequent removal
     of color, BOD5, and COD from the biologically treated domestic
     and dyeing process wastewaters.  The adsorption capacity,
     however, is significantly below that of powdered activated
     carbon.

2.   The use of column reactors (expanded or packed-bed) for fly
     ash-wastewater contacjt was found to be impractical due to
     problems related to hydraulic plugging and channeling of flow
     resulting from the extremely fine fly ash and the suspended
     solids present in the wastewater.

3.   The use of slurry fly ash contacting reactors was also demon-
     strated impractical due to the volume of fly ash required in
     excess of that produced at the mill to achieve a significant
     color reduction of the wastewaters.

4.   Chemical destabilization of the effluent from the existing bio-
     logical treatment system was demonstrated to have the ability
     of accomplishing removal of color and the production of a super-
     natant of suitable quality to recycle.

5.   Of eleven destabilizing agent combinations investigated, it was
     proven that alum or lime with an anionic polyelectrolyte could
     successfully accomplish removal of color and the production
     of a supernatant suitable to recycle.

-------
6.   Lime-polyelectolyte coagulation illustrated the ability of producing
     a sludge with good dewatering characteristics which was amenable to
     dewatering with conventional vacuum filtration techniques.  The
     chemical and disposal costs associated with the lime dosages re-
     quired were, however, considered economically impractical for
     present application.

7.   Economically, the use of alum coagulation has the potential of re-
     sulting in a significant savings in chemical cost over that of the
     lime-polyelectrolyte coagulant cost.  The economic advantage of
     alum, however, is contingent upon the cost associated with that of
     overcoming the poor dewatering properties of the alum sludge.
     The alum sludge was not considered to be capable of conventional
     vacuum filtration techniques without further proper conditioning.

8.   The practicability of utilizing coal-fired boiler flue gases to
     neutralize caustic wastewaters was demonstrated.  Caustic waste-
     waters were used in conjunction with a conventional wet scrubber to
     successfully neutralize the wastewaters by carbon dioxide and sul-
     fur dioxide absorption from the flue gas while simultaneously re-
     ducing the particulate emissions.

9.   Neutralization of the wastewaters by flue gas scrubbing appeared to
     improve the efficiency of the subsequent biological treatment system
     by producing a more favorable pH and alkalinity while producing
     relatively insignificant other detrimental effects upon the waste-
     water .

-------
                               SECTION II

                             RECOMMENDATIONS
1.    As a result of the laboratory chemical destabilization investiga-
     tions, it is recommended that future efforts in this area should
     be directed into the use of alum coagulation.

2.    Further investigation of alum coagulation should be concentrated
     on improving the sludge dewatering characteristics.  It is re-
     commended that additional polyelectrolytes and suitable sludge
     conditioners be investigated to improve the amenability of alum
     sludge to conventional vacuum filtration techniques.  Other de-
     watering techniques such as the cyclone or various gravity-type
     filters should also be investigated.

3.    If the investigations, as recommended in 1 and 2 above, prove
     successful, it is further recommended that the alum coagulation
     evaluation be extended to a pilot scale study to provide in-
     dicative chemical cost and operational data for a continuous
     flow system.  Consideration should also be given at this time
     to the possible use of the scrubber installation for producing
     the optimum pH levels required for alum coagulation.  This
     could result in a significant economic savings in a full scale
     installation.

-------
                                SECTION III

                               INTRODUCTION
 High pH and color are often typical characteristics of textile dye-
 house wastewaters.  In addition to the complexity of wastewater treat-
 ment problems, mills presently operating coal-fired boilers or those
 faced with the conversion to coal as a result of fuel shortages, are
 now confronted with tasks of meeting compliance regulations related
 to the control of noxious gases and particulate emissions.  The
 intent of this research project was to investigate an integrated solu-
 tion to both of these problems.  The approach was to combine dye waste-
 waters and combustion by-products of coal to offset the less desirable
 effects of each by utilizing the causticity of the dyehouse wastewater
 and the neutralizing capacity of the scrubbed flue gases.

 Included in this report are the results of a forty-four month research
 project initiated jointly by Canton Textile Mills, Inc. of Canton,
 Georgia and the United States Environmental Protection Agency under
 EPA Grant S800852.  The objectives of the research project as proposed
 were as follows:

 1.   Investigate the practicability of utilizing the caustic waste-
      waters resulting from the dyeing processes, as a scrubbing
      agent in conventional scrubber equipment to accomplish a reduc-
      tion of the particulate matter and noxious gases in the flue
      gas while neutralizing the wastewater causticity.

 2.   Investigate the potential of using the residual carbon adsorp-
      tion value of the fly ash generated from the combustion of coal
      for the adsorption and subsequent removal of the color produc-
      ing dyes from the wastewater.

 3.   Investigate the feasibility of utilizing the fly ash as a fil-
      tration media to remove suspended solids from the wastewater
      while simultaneously removing color by adsorption.

 4.   Utilize the treatment concepts listed in 1, 2, and 3 above in con-
      junction with a conventional biological wastewater treatment system
      to produce a final wastewater quality suitable for recycle to the
      dyeing process.

 The research project was performed in two phases.  The initial phase,
 including bench scale and pilot testing, was conducted to provide
 design information for a full scale application.  Early in the bench
'scale investigation of the fly ash adsorption of color, it was con-
 cluded that this technique of color removal was impractical for this
 application.   As a result, the scope of the project was redefined to
 include an evaluation of the feasibility of utilizing chemical desta-
 bilization techniques of color removal from the dyehouse wastewaters.

-------
The second phase consisted of a demonstration of the full scale scrubber
installation as an integral part of the mill's total wastewater treat-
ment facility.

Simultaneously with the EPA Research and Demonstration Grant, Canton
Textile Mills, Inc. initiated a program to upgrade the existing biological
treatment system in order to obtain compliance with the Georgia Department
of Natural Resources' wastewater treatment regulations.  This necessitated
several major modifications to the existing treatment facility.  These
modifications are described within this report.  Due to the time factor
involved in upgrading the existing biological system (i.e., preliminary
field engineering, submittal of plans for state approval, final design
engineering, equipment purchase, and construction), the bench scale phase
of the fly ash adsorption research was conducted concurrently with this
work.  Therefore, to accomplish the bench scale fly ash investigations,
it was necessary to simulate the expected improvement in the effluent.
This was attempted by simply screening or filtering the existing system's
effluent to reduce the concentration of suspended solids.

The research reported herein is a combined effort of Canton Textile Mills,
Inc., of Canton, Georgia and R. S. Noonan, Inc. of South Carolina, Green-
ville, South Carolina, (Consulting Engineers).

PROJECT SITE

The site of the project is Canton Textile Mills, Inc.'s Mill No. 2 in
Canton, Georgia.  This facility produces an average of 60,000 to 80,000
pounds of finished cotton denim fabric per day with a normal seven-day,
24-hour per day, mill production week and a 5-day per week dyehouse
production week.

Manufacturing Process Description

A number of mechanical operations have to be performed to convert cotton
fibers into fabrics.  The operations performed at this facility to pro-
duce fabric are shown in the flow diagram listed as Figure 1.  Although
several of these processes are wet operations, the primary contributor
in terms of pollution load and volume of wastewater is the dyeing opera-
tion.   Indigo and sulfur dyeing processes are utilized at the mill.

-------
  RAW COTTON]

j   OPENING "~|
     *
j   PICKING   I
     *
j   CARDING   I
     *
j   DRAWING   j

|   SPINNING   |

{   WINDING   j

j
                                  DYEING

                              |  WARPING

                              j  SLASHING  j


                              j  WEAVING   |


                                 SINGEING  |
                                 '  *
                              I  PRINTING  j

                              |  FINISHING  |
                 Figure 1.   Canton Textile Mills, Inc.'s
                   manufacturing process flow diagram
Due to  the  larger number of aqueous rinses, the indigo dyeing process  is
the major contributor of wastewater in terms of volume.  A flow diagram
of the  indigo process is provided in Figure 2.  Dry cotton warp fibers
enter a wetting  out bath containing a penetrant.  The warp fibers are
then rinsed with cold water and processed through a series of five  indi-
go dye  vats containing indigo reduced with sodium hydrosulfite and
caustic soda.  Following each addition of indigo dye, the fiber is  oxi-
dized in air.  Once the dyeing cycle is completed, the dyed cotton  fibers
are given an additional three stage wash consisting of cold, warm,  and
hot water baths  and dried.

-------
00
                                 INDIGO
                                  NoOH
                                  DYE

                                MAKE-UP
                         FRESH WATER
              PENETRANT
COTTON^
 fc • A M^ ^ B ^^^
              YARN
                       1
WET OUT

  BATH
                                    WASHER
                                   \ I
DYE VATS
                                                   t  \
WASHERS
                                                             t  \
                                                   t  \
DRYER
                                               EFFLUENT TO SEWER
                            Figure 2.  Flow diagram of indigo dyeing process.

-------
The sulfur or commonly called sulfur-black process consists of  two  sepa-
rate types of dye applications as  illustrated in Figure  3.  In  this pro-
cess, the sulfur-black dye is applied  in  the initial vat along  with a
formulation of soluble oil, penetrant, and sodium sulfite which is  part
of the purchased dye.  A cold water wash  follows the sulfur dye vat after
which the warp enters a single stage indigo dye bath and is oxidized in
air.  The indigo vat contains indigo dyestuff, sodium hydroxide, sodium
hydrosulfite and dextrose.  The fiber  is  finally rinsed  twice,  once with
cold water and once with hot water, and dried.  Occasionally, this  dye
range is utilized for varying types of sulfur and naphthol colors with
diluted hydrogen peroxide used in  oxidizing the various  colors.  The
relative use of the different dyes varies with production requirements.

During the latter stages of this project  (in January 1975), the sulfur
dye range was modified to reverse  the  points of indigo and sulfur dye
applications.  This was done to produce a more desirable color  in the
final product.  This change also significantly reduced the quantity of
sulfur dye used and as a result, altered  the wastewater characteristics
somewhat.  This process change had no  direct bearing on the major por-
tion of the project except in evaluating  the effect of scrubber neutrali-
zation.  Further discussion has, therefore, been restricted to  that
portion of this report.

Wastewater Characterization

The wastewaters resulting from the dyeing processes contribute  a major
portion of the total volume of wastewater to the mill's treatment facil-
ity.  During production periods, this wastewater stream ranges  from 570
to 850 liters per minute (150-225  gpm).  Normal daily production time
for each dye unit varies greatly from  day to day, ranging from  10 to 24
hours.  The wastewater from each of the dyeing units (indigo and sulfur)
is characterized in Table 1.

The dyeing process wastewaters combine with three additional wastewaters—
sanitary sewage from the mill and  a nearby residential area (96 liters/
minute) and the discharge from a local hospital (36 liters/minute)—to
form a total average weekday volume of 1037 cubic meters (274,000 gal-
lons).  Because of the mill's five-day dyehouse production schedule, the
weekend flow drops off significantly to an average of 273 cubic meters
(72,000 gallons) per day and is almost entirely domestic sewage and
hospital wastes.  A profile of the typical weekday and weekend  wastewater
characteristics is provided in Table 2.

Because the major portion of the total wastewater volume results from
the dyeing processes, the influent wastewater characteristics often
vary quite dramatically as a result of frequent production variations.
In addition to flow variations resulting  from production trends, the
influent is influenced by apparent rainwater infiltration.  This is
quite obvious from the heavy influent  flow rates observed during rainy
periods.

-------
                  SULFUR BLACK    INDIGO
                 i
            DYE

           MAKE-UP
                 FRESH WATER
COTTON  „
 YARN
    NaOH
               1
    DYE
    MAKE
    DOWN
            \ r
           DYE  VAT
WASHER
DYE VAT
                                                v   v
WASHER
DRYER
                                                     EFFLUENT TO SEWER
              Figure 3.  Folw diagram of sulfur dyeing process.

-------
           Table 1.   CHARACTERIZATION OF DYE WASTEWATERS
Parameter
Tempera-
ture
PH
Color
COD
BOD
TOC
Total
Solids
Suspended
Solids
Iron
Zinc
Calcium
Magnesium
Units
°C
Units
APHA Pt.-Co.
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
Indigo Range
40
10.5-11.5
5500-7500
750-950
400-750
150-300
2500-3300
50-300
0.10-0.5
0.05-0.10
9-13
4-7
Sulfur Range
60
10-11
24000-34000
2500-3500
900-1350
-
-
100-340
-
-
-
-
Modified
Sulfur Range3
60
10-11
-
500-1700
400-750
300-500
1600-3400
200-450
1-1.3
0.3-0.5
6-11
4-8
a Wastewater resulting from the reversal of the sulfur and indigo
  dye application points.  This change took place in January, 1975
  at which time the fly ash adsorption and chemical coagulation
  studies had been completed.
                              11

-------
       Table 2.  TYPICAL PROFILE OF INFLUENT WASTEWATER
                         TO THE TREATMENT SYSTEM
Parameter
Flow
Temperature
Dissolved Oxygen
pH
p Alkalinity
m Alkalinity
Acidity
Color
COD
BOD
TOC
Zinc
Chromium
Copper
Iron
Phosphate, Total
Nitrogen, Total
Kjeldahl
Total Solids
Total Volatile
Solids
Suspended Solids
Dissolved Solids
Units
1pm
°C
mg/1
Units
mg/1 as CaC03
mg/1 as CaC03
mg/1 as CaO>3
APHA Pt. Co.
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1

mg/1
mg/1

mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
Weekday
Influent3
720
25-40
2-5
10.0-11.5
150-350
400-900
-
2800-10,000
500-1800
300-500
250-400
0.2-1.9
0.1-0.4
0.05
0.7-1.8
5-8

5-30
1600-3700

400-800
80-230
600-2200
Weekend .
Influent3
190
14-18
5-8
6.0-7.5
-
50-150
10-40
400-5000
300-600
100-300
80-150
0.1-0.3
0.5-0.09
0.05
0.7-1.4
6-8

15-30
400-800

100-200
60-130
250-350
Average results of analyses performed on 24-hour composite samples.
                               12

-------
Existing Biological Treatment System

The mill's biological treatment facility, as it existed at the beginning
of the research project, is shown in Figure 4.  Constructed in 1960, this
system consisted of screening,  preaeration, extended aeration activated
sludge, and clarification.  Flow monitoring was accomplished at an influ-
ent parshall flume.  Due to the extended aeration nature of the activated
sludge process, the system relied on complete oxidation to prevent sludge
accumulation.  More specific design data for this system is provided in
the Appendix in Table Al.

The results of a routine weekly influent-effluent wastewater monitoring
program conducted during the period of May 1971 through May 1973 are
summarized in Table 3.  As may be observed from this data, the existing
treatment system was characterized by frequent upsets in operation
leading to poor treatment efficiencies.  The instability of the treat-
ment system was attributed to large variations in flow and frequent
changes in the influent wastewater chemical characteristics (e.g., BOD,
COD, and pH).
         Table 3.  PROFILE OF EXISTING TREATMENT SYSTEM'S
           INFLUENT-EFFLUENT WASTEWATER CHARACTERISTICS3
Parameter
BOD5
COD
Total
Solids
Suspended
Solids
PH
Units
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
Units
Influent @
Parshall Flume
Ave. (Std. Deviation)
429 (244)
1045 (474)
1808 (595)
230 (89)
10.3 (1.0)
Effluent (3
Clarifier Overflow
Ave. (Std. Deviation)
163 (88)
547 (339)
1071 (365)
190 (96)
7.8 (0.9)
Average
Removal
%
62
48
41
27
-
  Data taken from routine weekly monitoring - May, 1971 through
  May, 1973.

  NOTE;  This data was taken on weekdays only and does not reflect
         weekend characteristics.
                                 13

-------
                               •INDUSTRIAL WASTEWATER
                               •DOMESTIC WASTEWATER
                               • HOSPITAL WASTEWATER
SLUDGE RETURN (624LPM)
                                          PRE-AERATION
                                            TANK
                       MIXING
                       BOX
                      718 LPM 5 DAYS WK
                      189 LPM 2 DAYS WK
                     BAR SCREEN
                    PARSHALL FLUME
    ACTIVATED
    SLUDGE
    AERATION
    TANK
   tr±3
                                  MANHOLE
             GRIT CHAMBER
                       LEGEND
               CFR) FLOW RECORDER
                    LEVEL ACTUATED SWITCH
                                                                           EXISTING AIRV
                                                                           LIFT
                                                   LIFT STATION
  CLARIFIER

  SLUDGE
  RETURN
 --PUMP
 MANHOLE
—n
                        DISCHARGE
                          TO
                        ETOWAH
                         RIVER
Figure  4.   Flow diagram of Canton  Textile Mills, Inc.'s existing wastewater treatment facility

-------
Upgraded Treatment System

In order to obtain compliance with the Georgia Department of Natural
Resources' treatment requirements, Canton Textile Mills, Inc. initiated
a program to upgrade the existing biological treatment system.  At the
date of the upgrading of the existing facility, the State of Georgia's
Department of Natural Resources specified a treatment equivalent  to
secondary treatment which is defined as approximately eighty-five
percent (85%) removal of the five-day Biochemical Oxygen Demand'-.

The first step in upgrading the existing treatment system was to bring
the system to its highest attainable level of operating efficiency.  Dur-
ing a special maintenance period, all pipes were flushed, excess grit and
sludge were removed from tanks, .air spargers were cleaned, and adjustments
made to the clarifier weir.  In addition, a daily operational log was in-
itiated so that performance trends could be observed and operational ad-
justments made if necessary.

Although the clean-up and operational changes greatly improved the ef-
ficiency of the system, it was concluded that three major modifications
would be necessary to obtain reliable treatment levels on a daily basis.
First, the flow from the grit chamber was diverted to a newly constructed
equalization pond with a nominal capacity of 3785m^ (1,000,000 gallons).
The purpose of this pond was to dampen flow fluctuations and protect the
biomass from shock organic loads resulting from the mill's production
variations.  The second modification consisted of providing additional
clarification, increased sludge recycle capabilities, and provisions for
sludge wasting and aerobic digestion.  Provisions were made in the selec-
tion of new clarifier and aerobic digester to allow those units to be
utilized in a future chemical coagulation system if such a system proved
feasible.  The third addition to the system provided for the chlorination
of the final effluent.  A flow diagram of the upgraded system is provided
in Figure 5 and a photograph of the system is provided in Figure 6 with
more specific design data tabulated in the Appendix in Table A2.

The upgrading work was completed in May, 1974.  The results of a seven-
day monitoring program provided in Table 4 shows the typical treatment
efficiencies resulting from this program.  The effect of equalization
is readily apparent as shown by the reduced standard deviations of the
wastewater's characteristics.  The high concentration of suspended solids
in the effluent is attributed to the presence of colloidal suspensions of
dye which are not biologically destabilized.
                                 15

-------
                      •INDUSTRIAL WASTEWATER
                      •DOMESTIC WASTEWATER
                      •HOSPITAL WASTEWATER
                                                     SLUDGE RETURN (624LPM)
                                               SLUDGE RETURN PUMP
                                               •AIR LIFT PUMPS

                                                 »
                                                          ACTIVATED
                                                          SLUDGE
                                                          AERATION
                                                          TANK
PRE'AERATION TANK i
               7I8LPM5DAYSWK.
               I89LPM 2 DAYS WK.
               BAR SCREEN
                                             BIOLOGICAL
                                             CLARIFIER
               PARSHALL FLUME
                 GRIT CHAMBER
            _        GATES   _

            L3~BYPASS     T   I
                   WET WELL
                                           SUPERNATANT
                                                   CHLORINE
                                                   CONTACT
                                                   BASIN
     LIFT STATION
                                             EMERGENCY DRAIN
                                                                 AEROBIC  XEMERGENCY  DRAIN
                                                                 DIGESTER
                                                           DIGESTED SLUDGE

                                                                    LEGEND
          SLUDGE
          LAGOON
SLUDGE
LAGOON
EQUALIZATION
   BASIN
DISCHARGE
   TO
 ETOWAH
  RIVER
                              SUPERNATANT
                                    FLOW RECORDER  ,
                               £AS)  LEVEL ACTUATED SWITCH

                                    LEVEL TRANSMITTER
                               CV)  AUTOMATIC CONTROLS VALVE
Figure 5,  Flow diagram of Canton  Textile Mills, Inc.'s  upgraded wastewater treatment facility

-------
Figure 6.  Canton Textile Mills, Inc.'s upgraded wastewater treatment facility

-------
                                   Table 4.  PROFILE OF UPGRADED TREATMENT SYSTEM'S
                                    INFLUENT-EFFLUENT WASTEWATER CHARACTERISTICS3
Parameter
BOD5
COD
TOC
Alkalinity, M
Total Solids
Total Vola-
tile Solids
Suspended
Solids
Susp. Volatile
Solids
Settleable
Solids
PH
Units
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1 as CaC03
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
Units
Influent @
Parshall Flumeb
Ave.(Std. Deviation)
392 (158)
884 (266)
241 (62)
431 (168)
1880 (579)
570 (162)
129 (66)
100 (43)
-
10.0 (0.7)
Equalization
Pond Effluent
Ave.(Std. Deviation)
394 (85)
931 (38)
238 (26)
422 (33)
1930 (124)
492 (97)
171 (30)
131 (23)
-
8.6 (0.4)
Final Effluent
Ave.(Std. Deviation)
42 (14)
284 (72)
92 (29)
209 (30)
1634 (102)
254 (68)
175 (50)
181 (90)
0.1
6.9 (0.3)
Removal
%
89
68
62
-
13
-
-
-
-
-
a Data was taken during seven-day monitoring period, August 21-27, 1974.
00
          To allow comparison with previous data, influent averages are for weekdays only.

-------
                                SECTION IV

                        FLY ASH  ADSORPTION OF COLOR
One of the major problems  resulting from the combustion of coal is  the
disposal of  the combustion by-product,  fly ash.   Due to the ever-
increasing demand  for  cleaner  air,  the  quantity  of  fly  ash recovered
from the combustion  of coal in furnace  - boiler  systems has increased
appreciably  over the recent years.   The disposal of this fly ash has now
become an acute solid  waste problem .

It has recently been reported  that  less than ten percent (10%)  of the
fly ash generated  in the United States  is utilized  to any degree3.
Efforts to utilize or  at least recover  disposal  costs have been primarily
directed towards utilization of the pozzolanic properties of fly ash for
a constituent  in concrete  and  concrete  products  .   One  area that has
recently gained recognition involves the utilization of fly ash as  an
adsorbent material .

Due to the residual  carbon value of fly ash and  its relatively  large sur-
face area per  unit volume,  fly ash  exhibits many of the adsorbent charac-
teristics of activated carbon^.  Fly ash has been reported in the litera-
ture to be an  effective adsorbent for the removal of various chemical
constituents such  as refractory organic materials^,  phenols^, and color
resulting from various soluble organic  materials found  in polluted  lake
waters-*.  It is this adsorption characteristic that was used as the
basis for the  investigation of fly  ash  as a mechanism of color  removal
from the wastewaters of Canton Textile  Mills, Inc.

PROPERTIES OF  FLY  ASH

Fly ash consists of  a  heterogeneous material consisting of minute par-
ticles of inert compounds  and  partially burned carbon particles generally
ranging in size from 0.5 to 300 microns.   Chemically, fly ash consists of
unburned carbon and  a  variety  of oxides - aluminum,  magnesium and sulfur -
as well as other trace metals.   The physical size and shape of  fly  ash
particles is largely determined by  the  type of coal,  type of firing equip-
ment, and even the type of  collection system employed.

The source of  fly  ash  used  for the  research was  obtained from Canton
Textile Mills, Inc.'s  27.2  metric ton per hour (60,000  pounds per hour)
spreader stoker-fired  boiler (Combustion Engineering, Inc.'s C-E Verti-
cal Unit).   This installation  utilizes  a Whirlex dust collector to  re-
move approximately 34  to 45 kilograms (75 to 100 Ibs.)  of fly ash per
hour.  A typical analysis of this fly ash is provided in Table  5.
                                   19

-------
                   Table 5.  TYPICAL ANALYSIS OF
                   CANTON TEXTILE MILLS' FLY ASH
 Chemical  Composition                                        By Weight  (%)

   Silica,  Si02                                                  19-72
   Alumina, A1203                                                22.03
   Iron Oxide, Fe203 or Fe304                                     6.00
   Calcium Oxide,  CaO                                             1.72
   Magnesium Oxide, MgO                                           1.11
   Sulfur  Trioxide, 803                                           0.63
   Loss on Ignition, Carbon                                      46.21
   Trace Elements  (By Difference)                                 2.58

 Physical  Properties                                         By Weight  (%)

   Range of Particle Size, Microns                             0.5-2500
   Ave. %  Passing  No. 325 Sieve  (U. S. Standard)                    21
   Bulk Density, gm/cc                                            0.47
   Specific Gravity, gm/cc                                         2.0
LABORATORY  INVESTIGATION

The objective of  the laboratory investigation was to evaluate fly ash as
an adsorption media for the removal of color from Canton Textile Mill,
Inc.'s wastewaters.  Over one hundred tests were performed to determine
optimum parameters for a full scale fly ash color removal system.  These
tests investigated various contacting systems - batch, packed-bed, and
expanded-bed as well as the effects of pH and temperature on the adsorp-
tion capacity.

Adsorption  Isotherms

Prior to initiating the investigation of the various fly ash - wastewater
contacting  systems, a series of jar tests was conducted in order to  de-
velop adsorption  isotherms.  An adsorption isotherm is simply a plot
showing the relationship between the amount of impurities  (color) ad-
sorbed on a unit weight of adsorption media (fly ash) and  the amount of
impurities  (color) remaining in the wastewater.  These isotherms are
useful in:

1.   Providing a general indication of the effectiveness of  the adsorp-
     tion media.
                                  20

-------
2.   Predicting the maximum quantity of impurities  (color) capable of
     being adsorbed onto the media.

The adsorption isotherms were developed by placing various quantities of
fly ash in each of several jars containing a constant volume and concen-
tration of dye wastewaters.  The jars were then shaken simultaneously for
a period of thirty minutes by a mechanical "shaker with the supernatant
color measured both before and after agitation.  The adsorption capacity
was then expressed as an adsorption isotherm in accord with the Freund-
lich Equation®.  The Freundlich Equation has the general form:

                            x/m - k CRn                              (01)

where     x = Amount of residual color reduction due to adsorption
                                t- Co.
          m = Mass Concentration of the Fly Ash, gm/1

          k = Constant  (obtained from graphical plot)

          n = Constant  (obtained from graphical plot)

          CR= Residual  Color of Adsorbate at Equalibrium Expressed in
               APHA Pt. Co.

          Cz= Initial Color  (APHA Pt. Co.)

It is usual practice to take logarithms of both sides of the above expres
sion to obtain:

                    log x/m = log k + n log CR                       (02)

Therefore, a plot of log  (x/m) vs. log (Cr) will be a straight line with
a slope of "n" and an intercept of "log k".  This data was then used in
predicting fly ash requirements for single batch treatment and column sys
tems.

The isotherm plot was also used to provide an indication of the theo-
retical adsorption capacity.  The adsorption capacity was determined by
entering the abscissa with the initial color concentration (Co) and ob-
taining the color reduction per mass concentration of fly ash  (x/m) at
the intersection of the isotherm plot.

In the investigation, adsorption isotherms were determined utilizing the
final effluent from the mill's biological treatment facility.  Three
typical isotherms are shown using the following variations:

1.   Isotherm No. 1 was developed with the treatment plant's final ef-
     fluent and with fly ash from the mill's coal-fired boiler.
                                  21

-------
 2.    Isotherm No.  2 was  derived with  the  final effluent prefiltered
      through  a  12-inch deep  sand  filter for suspended solids removal and
      again with the mill's fly ash.

 3.    Isotherm No.  3 was  determined utilizing the sand filtered effluent
      and Westvaco's Aqua Nuchar A powdered activated carbon.

 The results of  these  investigations are tabulated  in Table  6 with the
 corresponding graphical  plots provided in Figures  7-9.

 The results of  the adsorption isotherm investigations led to the follow-
 ing conclusions:

 1.    Fly ash  was capable of  removing  the  color constituent  from the
      wastewaters.

 2.    Removal  or reduction of suspended solids appears to enhance the
      ability  of the fly  ash  to adsorb color as is  observed  in the in-
      creased  adsorbance  capacity.

 3.    The results of the  isotherm  test indicate that the fly ash require-
      ments to achieve an effluent color of less than 100 APHA Pt. Co.
      color units will be significantly larger than the fly  ash available
      from  the mill's  boiler.  By  utilizing the Freundlich Equation and
      the constants developed in the isotherm plots (Figures 7 - 9), it is
      predicted  that 61 gm of fly  ash  will be required per liter of unfil-
      tered wastewater to reduce the color from 440 to 100 APHA Pt. Co.
      Units while 23 gm of fly ash will be required per liter of the fil-
      tered effluent for  a similar color reduction.  These values dras-
      tically  exceed the  quantity  of fly ash available from  the mill's
      boiler per unit  volume  of wastewater which is 0.8 gm/1.

 4.    Comparatively, powdered activated carbon exhibits a superior adsorp-
      tion  capacity to that of fly ash.  By use of  the Freundlich Equation
      •and data developed  in the isotherm plot  (Figure 8), it is predicted
      that  only  2  gm of activated  carbon will be required per liter of
      filtered effluent to achieve an  effluent with a color  level of  100
      APHA  Pt. Co.  Units.  Therefore,  it appears that the fly ash is only
      approximately 10 percent as  effective as the  powdered  activated  car-
      bon in achieving color  removal.

Packed-Bed Contacting Systems

The first  of  the bench scale investigations of the various  contacting
systems  were  performed with  the test  apparatus illustrated  in  Figure  10.
This  system consisted of a 5.72cm I.D. (2.25  inch  I.D.) plexiglass,  gravity
feed  column containing varying amounts of fly ash. Wire mesh  screen
was used at both fly  ash interfaces of the column  to retain the  fly  ash.
A constant liquid  level  was  maintained in the overhead  feed tank through
the use  of a  sump  pump controlled by  a level  switch.
                                   22

-------
             Table 6.  TYPICAL ADSORPTION ISOTHERM DATA

Isotherm No. la (raw effluent and boiler fly ash)
Fly Ash Dosage (m)
(gm/liter of wastewater)
0
5
20
60
100
170
Residual Color (CR)
(APHA Pt. Co. Units)
440
400
150
125
25
5
Color Removed (x)
(X = CT - CR)
_
40
290
315
415
435
x/m
_
8.0
14.5
5.2
4.2
2.6
Isotherm No. 2b (prefiltered effluent and boiler fly ash)
Fly Ash Dosage (m)
(gm/liter of wastewater)
0
2.50
3.75
5.00
10.00
25.00
Residual Color (CR)
(APHA Pt. Co. Units)
440
400
390
370
300
60
Color Removed (x)
(X = CT - CR)
_
40
50
70
140
380
x/m
_
16.0
13.4
14.0
14.0
15.2
Isotherm No. 3° (prefiltered effluent and Westvaco's Aqua Nuchar A
Powdered Activated Carbon)
Act. Carbon Dosage (m)
(gm/liter of wastewater)
0
1.25
2.50
3.75
5.00
10.00
Residual Color (CR)
(APHA Pt. Co. Units)
420
180
30
10
0
0
Color Removed (x)
(X = Ci - CR)
m,.
240
390
410
420
420
x/m
	
192.0
156.0
109.0
84.0
42.0
a Refer to Figure 7 for graphical plot.

b Refer to Figure 8 for graphical plot.

c Refer to Figure 9 for graphical plot.
                                 23

-------
N>
               50

               40


               30



               20
            CO
                ,o

                !
            o
8

fe

H

1
ADSORPTION  CAPACITY = 7.9
                          1.75


                           I     I    I   I  I  I  11
                        I     I    I  I   I  MM
                                           I
1
                                IO
• cooo        poo oooOo
    —        C3    K>   * in <0 f-®0>
                                                          8O   O  O
                                                          o   o
                                                          m   *
                                                                                      esi
                                               Cr = RESIDUAL COLOR, APHA PT-Ca UNIT

                                                     (ONE LITER SAMPLE)



                              Figure 7.  Fly ash adsorption isotherm with existing effluent.

-------
M
Ul



^
3
u.
o
s
£
UJ

0
**
¥
I
o
u

&
£
§
i
.

50
40
30

20


10

8
7
6
5




3

2

1
1

•••MM
i«MM>
•••MBA*

•M^M*
ADSORPTION CAPACITY = 15.0 g) 0
— f 	 ~~ 	 |n=O.Ol"u&nT1" ^l
•wmv
••••••*
— Crs440
—
_
_ k» 14.0



MM*

•MM*

i 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 | III
CM ro «- ««>NCOO>O § g 0 gggoog | 8 | 8
Cr a RESIDUAL COLOR.APHA PT.-CO. UNIT
                                                   (ONE  LITER SAMPLE)
                           Figure 8.   Fly  ash adsorption isotherm with prefiltered effluent.

-------
0>2



               Cr
                                                    O
                                                    10
o  o o p oog
*tf  IO (0 ^* QOO^^'^
888
lO  
                                   RESIDUAL COLOR, APHA PT.-CO. UNIT

                                          (ONE LITER SAMPLE)
            Figure 9.  Powdered activated  carbon isotherm with prefiltered  effluent.

-------
                      LEVEL  CONTROLLER
FEED
TANK
                SAMPLE
                STORAGE
                                  —STOPPER
                                    SCREEN
                                    ASH
                                    PLEXIGLASS
                                    TUBE (5.7cm)
                                    SCREEN

                                    STOPPER
                                    EFFLUENT
                                    STORAGE
    Figure 10. Gravity feed, packed bed contacting test apparatus.
                         27

-------
The objectives of the first series of investigations utilizing the gravity
feed column were as follows:

1.   Determine the adsorption characteristics of the packed-bed fly ash
     column.

2.   Evaluate the feasibility of utilizing the fly ash column for the
     dual purpose of color adsorption and suspended solids removal.

Variables of these tests included the depth of fly ash and the type of
wastewater  (raw effluent or prefiltered effluent).  The prefiltered sam-
ples were obtained by passing the effluent through a 710 micron screen.
This was an attempt to simulate the expected effluent that would result
from the upgrading of the existing treatment plant.  During each test,
samples were withdrawn at periodic intervals for analysis of color, total
solids, and suspended solids.  A color level of less than 100 APHA Pt. Co.
units was arbitrarily established as an acceptable final effluent color.

Data taken during one of the more successful tests utilizing the prefil-
tered efffluent is provided in Table 7.  Also, data representative of
the other investigations with varying filter depths on each of the waste-
water conditions  (raw effluent or prefiltered effluent) is provided in the
Appendix as Tables A3 - A4.  The gravity fed column tests resulted in low
and erratic flow rates leading to the conclusion that a gravity-fed fly
ash column was impractical.  The columns did, however, successfully remove
the majority of the suspended solids.

To overcome the erratic flow rates, the system was modified to provide
for a pressurized feed and a sand filter pretreatment.  This test appa-
ratus is illustrated in Figures 11 and 12.  Data from one of the typical
tests is provided in Table 8.  As may be detected from the data, the
color level after 430 minutes of operation was still below the colorless
level (100 APHA Pt. Co. Units); however, the flow rate had declined
drastically as a result of the plugging and compaction of the fly ash.

It was thus concluded that packed-bed fly ash columns appeared to be  im-
practical due to the inability of the fly ash particles to maintain
their structural integrity.  This resulted in a continuous increase of
head loss through the filter media.  To overcome this difficulty, expan-
ded bed operation was investigated.

Expanded-Bed Contacting System

The principle of operation of the expanded-bed contacting system is  to
feed the wastewater through the bottom of the column at a velocity suf-
ficient to suspend the adsorbent particles.  Unlike the packed-bed sys-
tem,  particulate matter (suspended solids) in the wastewater  is  not  re-
tained in the column.  Thus, due to the expanded nature of the bed,  head
losses do not increase as a function of time.
                                   28

-------
           Table 7.  TYPICAL RESULTS OF FLY ASH PACKED-COLUMN
                     TESTS WITH PREFILTERED EFFLUENT3
Test Conditions;

  Fly Ash Bed Depth
  Fly Ash Weight
  Wastewater

  Mode of Contact
Elapsed Time
   (min.)
Flow Rate
l/min/m^
        25.4 cm (10 inches)
        318 gm (0.70 Ibs.)
        Filtered Effluent
          (710 micron screen)
        Gravity, Downflow

       Color         Total  Solids
(APHA Ft.  Co.  Units)    (mg/1)
Susp. Solids
   (mg/D
Effluent
Filtered
Effluent
0
30
60
90
120
150
180
210


—
33.16
21.88
13.65
13.65
13.65
12.91
9.78
7.82
2150

1895
30
20
35
50
50
60
110
310
1232

977
3974
1377
1173
1197
1240
1225
1406
1203
74

50
6
11
9
9
6
7
9
7
Total volume of effluent with color    100 APHA Pt. Co. Units = 7.6 liters

a Samples were prefiltered with U. S.  Standard Seive No. 325.
                                 29

-------
         5.1cm
         7.6cm

         203cm	1—
                            FILTER
LO
O
-GRAVEL
— <7IO)im
                                 SAMPLE
                                 STORAGE

 -»«**
•V
   *-ASH
    COLUMN I
                          w
               IcLARIFlER-J
                                   •=•.:•
                                   ". • »•*

                                   i
COLUMN 2
                                           EFFLUENT
                                           STORAGE
                        Figure 11.  Pressurized packed bed contacting test apparatus.

-------
                            TEST  IM°
                            NOVEMBER 15,1372
Figure 12.  Pressurized packed-bed fly  ash  test apparatus,
                           I]

-------
            Table  8.  TYPICAL PACKED-BED FLY ASH TEST RESULTS
 Test  Condition;

   Fly Ash Bed Depth
   Fly Ash Weight
   Wastewater
   Operation Mode
Column No. 1 - 25.4cm, Column No. 2 - 25.4cm
Column No. 1 - 454gm, Column No. 2 - 453gm
Prefiltered Effluent (sand filter)
Pressurized Feed, Downflow
 Elapsed  Time    Flow Rate         Color         Total Solids  Susp. Solids
    (min.)      (1/min/m2)   (APHA Pt. Co. Units)     (mg/1)	(mg/1)
Effluent
Filtered
Effluent
0
23
53
90
160
263
430



-
81.89
70.07
63.96
54.59
58.67
52.55
1300

1150
0
0
0
0
0
0
32.59 1 30
I
3706

2952
4291
2710
2898
1145
4590
-
2960

122

15
13
15
14
12
19
13
22

To  investigate  this mode of wastewater - fly ash contact, a test apparatus
as  illustrated  in Figure 13 was utilized.  The principle problem encoun-
tered with  this test set-up was that the fly ash tended to form conglomer-
ated masses.  These masses of fly ash then formed into packed beds at
various points  within the fly ash column depending upon flow rate and  re-
sulted in channeling of flow.  This phenomenon, therefore, negated the
advantage of the expanded-bed mode of operation.  Data from a typical
test with approximately fifty percent bed expansion  is provided in
Table 9.

Due to the  difficulties encountered with the* cohering properties of  the
fly ash in  the  columns and the resulting hydraulic conditions, it was
concluded that  further studies utilizing the column  mode of contact  were
impractical.  At this time, the investigation was directed toward the
use of a slurry contacting system.
                                 32

-------
    £$
          -ASH COLUMN
                                 uil
   o
   LfcJ
   UJ
   It.
              SAMPLE
              STORAGE
•EFFLUENT
STORAGE
Figure 13. Expanded bed contacting test apparatus.
                  33

-------
                 Table  9.   RESULTS OF FLY ASH EXPANDED-BED
                     TEST WITH PREFILTERED EFFLUENT
 Test Conditions;

   Fly Ash Bed Depth
   Fly Ash Weight
   Wastewater

   Mode of Contact
                                  22-28 cm (8.7-11.0  inches)
                                  318 grams (0.7  Ibs.)
                                  Filtered Effluent  (No.  4
                                    Whatman Paper)
                                  Pressurized,  Approximately
                                    50% Bed Expansion
                                     Color
Elapsed Time   Flow Rate     pH    (APHA Pt.   Total  Solids
   (min.)     (1/min/m2)  (Units)   Co.Units)      (mg/1)
Effluent
Filtered
Effluent
5
15
45


-
81.89
74.15
58.67
9.8

9.8
7.4
9.1
9.3
2025

1720
50
125
675
\ 1745

1430
2175
1557
—
84

62
_
-
—
                                                             Susp. Solids
                                                                 (mg/1)
 Total volume of  effluent with  color <100 APHA Pt. Co. Units = 2.84  liters
 Slurry  Contacting  System

 The  slurry  contacting  system employs a  combination of  simple  unit  opera-
 tions consisting of mixing, flocculation, and  settling.  The  results  of
 the  thirty  minute  adsorption isotherms  indicated  that  the  fly ash  was
 capable of  removing color in slurry type systems.  Also, preliminary  data
 obtained concerning settling characteristics of the  fly ash indicated
 that clarification would present no significant problems.  Therefore, a
 series of batch reactor investigations  were undertaken to  determine the
 feasibility of a slurry contact system.

 The bench scale fly ash slurry investigations  were conducted  with  a 30-
 liter batch reactor.   After the desired contact time,  the  slurry was
 filtered through No. 4 Whatman paper (20-25 micron pore size) to remove
 the fly ash granules.  The resulting filtrate  was then analyzed for
residual color and
                                 34

-------
The results of these tests are  shown in  Tables  10  &  11.   These  tests
demonstrate very conclusively that  the quantity of fly ash  available per
volume of wastewater is insufficient to  accomplish a significant color
reduction.  The results also show that the  adsorption reaction  is essen-
tially complete after the initial 30 minute contact  time.

Further studies were conducted  to ascertain the effect of pH and tempera-
ture on the adsorption properties of the fly ash.  These  tests, as tabu-
lated in Tables 12 & 13, show that  the color adsorption is  slightly
greater with increasing temperatures and acidic pH levels.  The increased
adsorption capacity of the fly  ash  at acidic pH ranges corresponds to the
theory that the increased ionization or  increased  hydrogen-ion  concentra-
tion results in the neutralization  of the negative surface  charges found
on the surface of carbon.  Thereby, the  hindrance  to diffusion  is reduced
and more active surface of the  carbon is available for adsorption^.
Further discussion of the interactions of acids and  bases with  activated
carbons is available in the literature9»10»H.   The  increased color
removal accomplished with increasing temperature is  believed to be a
result of an increase in the rate of adsorption rather than in  the adsorp-
tion capacity.  While the rate  of adsorption is directly  related to the
activation energy and therefore a function  of temperature,  the  extent of
adsorption is, however, indirectly  related  to temperature,  thus increases
with decreasing temperature .   The  range of temperatures  investigated
within this study was concluded to  be too small to alter  the extent of ad-
sorption to a significant degree, therefore, the increased  adsorption was
attributed to the increased rate of adsorption.

For comparative purposes, a similar series  of investigations was also
performed utilizing Westvaco's  Aqua Huchar  A -  powdered activated carbon.
During these tests, the powdered activated  carbon  was added in  amounts
equal to the fly ash additions  in the earlier investigations (23, 47, and
71 grams).  This amount is equivalent to one, two  and three times the
amount of fly ash produced on site  per 30 liters of  final effluent waste-
water discharged.  Because this investigation was  for comparative pur-
poses, the test period was limited  to thirty minute  batches only.  The
resulting data from these powdered  activated carbon  investigations is
provided in Table 14.  The results  of the powdered activated carbon
slurry tests show the superiority of the activated carbon to fly ash.
Further study involving activated ca-rbon was beyond  the scope of this
study.
                                   35

-------
                 Table 10.  FLY ASH SLURRY CONTACT TEST
                    RESULTS WITH UNFILTERED EFFLUENT
A.  Wastewater
    Fly Ash Addition
Contact Time
  (Minutes)
       30 liters (Final Effluent)
       23 grams (Equivalent to 75 Ibs/hr at
          a flow rate of 190 gpm)
        Color
(APHA Pt.  Co. Units)
 BODc
(mg/1)
Raw wastewater
30
60
90
3400
2800
2900
2800
1099
208
130
199
B.  Wastewater
    Fly Ash Addition
       30 liters (Final Effluent)     '
       47 grams (Equivalent to 150 Ibs/hr
          at a flow rate of 190 gpm)
Contact Time Color BOD5
(Minutes) (APHA Pt. Co. Units) (mg/1)

Raw wastewater
30
60
90
I
2900
950
950
1000

182
29
16
12
C.  Wastewater
    Fly Ash Addition
       30 liters (Final Effluent)
       71 grams (Equivalent to 225 Ibs/hr at
          a flow rate of 190 gpm)
Contact Time Color BOD5
(Minutes) (APHA Pt. Co. Units) (mg/1)
Raw wastewater
30
60
90
1900
1800
1600
700
95
59
43
40
                                 36

-------
             Table 11.  FLY ASH  SLURRY  CONTACT TEST RESULTS
                        WITH PREFILTERED EFFLUENT
A.  Wastewater

    Fly Ash Addition
30 liters, (Final Effluent Prefiltered
   with No.  4 Whatman Paper)
23 grams (Equivalent to 75 Ibs/hr @ a
   Flow Rate of 190 gpm)
Contact Time Color BOD5
(Minutes) (APHA Pt. Co. Units) (own)
(Prefiltered
Wastewater)
30
60
90
1575
1225
1200
1295
75
52
42
70
B.  Wastewater

    Fly Ash Addition
30 liters (Final Effluent Prefiltered
   with No.  4 Whatman Paper)
47 grams (Equivalent to 150 Ibs/hr @
   a Flow Rate of 190 gpm)
Contact Time Color BOD5
(Minutes) (APHA Pt. Co. Units) (ppm)
(Prefiltered
Wastewater)
30
60
90

1710
1300
1310
1250

85
71
65
54
C.  Wastewater

    Fly Ash Addition
30 liters (Final Effluent Prefiltered
   with No.  4 Whatman Paper)
71 grams (Equivalent to 225 Ibs/hr @
   a Flow Rate of 190 gpm) v
Contact Time Color
(Minutes) (APHA Pt. Co. Units)
(Prefiltered
Wastewater)
30
60
90

1470
990
1100
900
BOD5
(ppm)

73
51
49
65
                                  37

-------
                  Table 12.   EFFECT OF pH ON ADSORPTION
                          CAPACITY OF FLY ASH
Test Data:

  Slurry Contact Reactor
  Fly Ash:  23 grams per 30 liters of wastewater (equivalent to 75 Ibs/hr
            of Fly Ash and 190 gpm)
  Contact Time:  30 minutes
  Wastewater Profile:
    Final Effluent
    Color
    COD
    BOD5
    Suspended Solids
    Temperature
    pH
2950 APHA Pt.
283  mg/1
136  mg/1
84
13° C
8.8
Co. Units
  pH Adjustment Chemicals:  Sulphuric Acid & Sodium Hydroxide

                                Residual
pH
Units
2.7
5.3
7.0
8.9
10.7
Color
(APHA Pt. Co. Units)
1500
1900
2200
2600
2600
COD
(mg/1)
113
140
138
145
168
BOD5
(mg/1)
72
98
63
78
85
Susp. Solids
(mg/1)
160
64
40
48
48
                                 38

-------
                 Table 13.  EFFECT OF TEMPERATURE ON THE
                     ADSORPTION CAPACITY OF FLY ASH
Test Data:

  Slurry Reactor Contact
  Fly Ash:  23 grams per 30 liters of wastewater  (equivalent to 75 Ibs/hr
            of Fly Ash and 190 gpm)
  Contact Time:  30 minutes
  Wastewater Profile:
    Final Effluent
    Color
    COD
    BOD5
    Suspended Solids
    Temperature
3900 APHA Pt.  Co.  Units
566  mg/1
285  mg/1
216  mg/1
13° C
                               Residual
Temperature
(C°)
5
11
18
25
31
Color
(APHA Pt. Co. Units)
3000
2975
2950
2900
2800
COD
(mg/1)
172
249
174
528
197
BOD5
(mB/1)
90
189
98
340
106
Susp. Solids
(m*/l)
76
76
64
' 60
64
                                 39

-------
                  Table  14.  POWDERED ACTIVATED  CARBON
                       SLURRY CONTACT TEST RESULTS
A. Wastewater 30 liters (Final Effluent)
Powdered Activated Carbon Color 8005
(grams) (APHA Pt. Co. Units) (mg/1)
(Raw Wastewater)
23
47
71
220
1200
875
310
53
50
55
27
B.  Wastewater
Powdered Activated Carbon
	(grams)	
30 liters (Final Effluent Prefiltered
   with a 325 mesh screen)
       Color
(APHA Pt. Co. Units)
 BODs
(mg/1)
  (Prefiltered Wastewater)
      23
      47
      71
        1580
        1145
         930
         175
  42
  52
  45
  26
                                 40

-------
SUMMARY OF CONCLUSIONS OF FLY ASH COLOR ADSORPTION STUDY

The results of the preceding fly ash investigations  led to  the following
conclusions:

1.   Fly ash is capable of removing color, BODj,  and COD from the waste-
     waters at Canton Textile Mills, Inc.  The adsorption capacity of fly
     ash, however, is significantly below that of powdered  activated car-
     bon.

2.   Slurry contacting investigations have shown  conclusively that the
     quantity of fly ash produced at Canton Textile  Mills,  Inc. is much
     less than that necessary to accomplish the desired color reduction.

3.   The adsorption capability  of the fly ash can be improved in acidic
     pH ranges in accordance with the dominate theory that  the increased
     ionization effects the surface properties of the adsorbing material.
     A similar adsorption capability improvement  resulting  with increas-
     ing temperatures was concluded to be attributable to an increased
     adsorption rate rather than increased adsorption capacity.

4.   Problems related to hydraulic plugging as a  result of  the fineness
     of the fly ash particles and suspended solids present  in the waste-
     water, led to the conclusion that consideration of column (packed or
     expanded-bed) contacting systems was impractical.
                                   41

-------
                                SECTION V

             CHEMICAL DESTABILIZATION FOR REMOVAL OF COLOR


Until recently, the typical approach utilized for treating textile waste-
waters has resulted in a treatment scheme in'which the total wastestream
was biologically treated by some oxidative process such as the activated
sludge or extended aeration processes12.  Although this treatment ap-
proach is moderately successful in reducing the total organic content, it
has been relatively unsuccessful in removing color.  Typically, textile
dyeing and finishing operations are also subject to interrupted schedules
and wide variations of process chemicals which in turn cause wide fluctu-
ations in the operational performance of these biological systems.  The
presence of toxic dyestuffs, particularly sulfur dyes, as well as toxic
emulsifiers and leveling agents also tax the operating efficiency of
these biological systems1^.  Because of the aforementioned shortcomings
of biological systems and the increasing public pressure to eliminate
color from wastewater discharges, chemical coagulation techniques are now
beginning to gain prominence.

Historically, chemical coagulation techniques have been reported in the
literature to be successfully employed in the textile industry in reduc-
ing the BOD in strong textile wastes1^, as a polishing process on bio-
logically treated effluentlS, and as a complete treatment process for
the removal of toxic materials as well as color from the dyeing and fin-
ishing wastestreamsl^.  Coagulants which have been reported as effec-
tive in treating textile waste effluents include:  calcium hydroxide
(lime), ferrous sulfate, ferric chloride, calcium chloride, and alumi-
num sulfate (alum)13.

CHEMICAL DESTABILIZATION

Chemical clarification or destabilization generally consists of four
steps:  coagulation, flocculation, sedimentation and filtration.  As a
wastewater treatment process, coagulation is defined as the addition of
chemicals (coagulants) to effect destabilization and aggregation of non-
settleable suspended materials, commonly referred to as dispersions.  The
materials generally comprising these dispersions typically range in size
from 0.1 millimicrons to 100 microns and are commonly termed colloids.
The result of the chemical addition is the formation of floe particles
which have the ability to adsorb, entrap, or to aggregate the suspended
colloidal particles.  Most of the flocculated material is then removed
by sedimentation with the remainder removed by filtration.

There are several dominant theories associated with the mechanics of col-
loidal destabilization and the principles governing coagulation.  Discus-
sion of those theories and principles is beyond the scope of this report;
however, it can be found in the literature17'18'19'20.  Likewise, a dis-
cussion of the chemistry and stoichiometry of chemical coagulation reac-
tions is also well documented in the literature18'iy»20, and has, there-
fore, been omitted from this discussion.

                                  43

-------
 Laboratory  investigation of  the applicability of various chemical coagu-
 lants  is  typically  accomplished by  the use of a series of jar tests. This
 test consists  of  a  series of sample containers  (typically six) which may
 be mixed  by individual mechanically-operated stirrers.  The samples to be
 treated are placed  in the containers with the coagulants added while the
 contents  are mixed.  After a period of rapid agitation to ensure complete
 dispersion  of  the coagulant,  the mixing  rate is reduced and a period of
 particle  aggregation  (flocculation) is allowed to continue.  After the
 flocculating period, the mixing is  stopped and the  floe allowed to settle
 for a  selected time at which the supernatant may be withdrawn for
 analysis.   A typical step-by-step procedure description of the jar test
 methods utilized  during this investigation is provided in the Appendix as
 Table  A5.

 The jar test attempts to simulate the full scale coagulation-flocculation
 process under  controlled laboratory conditions.  The use of the jar test
 investigations affords the opportunity for taking a multitude of observa-
 tions  pertaining  to optimization of coagulants, effective pH ranges, and
 characteristics of  supernatant liquids or sludges.  These studies may
 also be employed  as a basis  for treatment plant design, although final
 design must feature flexibility in  mixing and feeding equipment to pro-
 ide for the differences between batch and continuous flow processes.

 LABORATORY  INVESTIGATION

 The primary objective of the laboratory  investigation was to evaluate the
 applicability  and effectiveness of  several chemical destabilizing agents
 for removing color  from the  various wastestreams of Canton Textile Mills,
 Inc.   The investigation was  carried out  in two phases.  The objective of
 the first phase was to determine the point within the wastewater system
 at  which  chemical destabilization would  be most effective.  The objec-
 tives  of  the second phase of the investigation was  then, to select the
 destabilizing  agent best suited for application on  the wastestream
 selected.   This selection was to be based upon supernatant quality,
 chemical dosage requirements, as well as the various parameters associ-
 ated with sludge  handling and disposal (i.e., sludge volume, sludge
 filterability,  and  chemical  recycle feasibility).

Destabilization Investigations

In  the  first phase  of the chemical  destabilization  investigations, four
wastewater  streams were selected as potential points for chemical addi-
tion.    These four points were:

1.    Wastewater stream from  the indigo dyeing process.
2.    Wastewater stream from  the sulfur dyeing process.
3.    Combined wastewater stream from the two dyeing processes.
4.    Effluent  from  the existing (prior to upgrading) biological
     wastewater treatment plant.
                                  44

-------
Because attention at this stage of the investigation was centered pri-
marily upon color removal, the selection of  the optimum location was
based entirely upon the color quality of the supernatant, relative
chemical dosage requirements, and visual observations related to the
various sludges.  Eight destabilizing agents or combinations thereof
were utilized in the initial screening series of jar tests.  A series
of jar tests wasconducted with each of eleven destabilizing agent
combinations on each of the four wastewater  streams to determine the
optimum color removal.  Various pH ranges were also investigated for
each destabilizing agent to insure optimum chemical dosage.  The re-
sults of these preliminary screening investigations are provided in
Table 15.

These preliminary investigations indicated that chemical destabiliza-
tion of the wastestreams from the dyeing processes, either separate or
combined, would be difficult.  In most cases, regardless of chemical
dosage, the color concentration of these wastestreams could not be brought
below 100 APHA Pt. Co. Units.  In those few  cases where the level of
100 APHA Pt. Co. Units could be reached, the chemical dosages required
were economically impractical.

Chemical destabilization investigations performed on the effluent from
the existing biological system, however, demonstrated that seven of
the destabilizing agents could successfully  reduce the color levels to
or below 100 APHA Pt. Co. Units.  Of these seven, three — concentrated
sulfuric acid, calcium chloride, and ferric  chloride — produced sludges
that were impractical to dewater due to their extreme fineness and ex-
cessive volume.  Aluminum sulfate, magnesium carbonate hydrolyzed with
lime, lime, and lime with an anionic polyelectrolyte visually demon-
strated the ability to produce a supernatant with low color concentra-
tions while producing a sludge with good settling properties.

At this point of the investigation, an additional series of jar tests
was performed on the effluent from the biological treatment system with
each of the four successful coagulants.  These tests were designed to
evaluate the effect of daily fluctuations of the wastewater over a week
period and to establish optimum coagulant dosages.  During these tests,
the quality of the supernatant was analyzed  in terms of BOD5, COD, and
suspended solids.  The results of these tests as summarized in Table 16
reinforced the earlier conclusions regarding the ability of these coagu-
lants to satisfactorily remove color.  They  also demonstrated the
ability of the coagulants to produce a supernatant with low BOD5, COD,
and suspended solids concentrations.

Sludge Characterization

To further evaluate the respective coagulants, the investigations in-
cluded characterizing the various sludges.   Sludge in sufficient
quantities for analysis was obtained through the use of a thirty-liter
batch reactor.  Each of the coagulant sludges were produced by reacting
                                   45

-------
                                 Table  15.   SUMMARY OF PHASE ONE JAR TEST INVESTIGATIONS
Destabilizing
Agent
Initial
H2S04(Conc.)

A12(S04)3-18H20

A12(S04)3-18H20
& Ca(OH)2
Ca(OH)2
Ca(OH)2 &
MgC03-3H20
Ca(OH)2 &
Dow A-23
Ca(OH)2 &
FeS04-7H20
Ca(OH)2 &
FeCl3-6H20
CaCl2
FeCl3'6H20
FeS04-7H20
Indigo Dyeing
Wastewater
Dosage3
-
1.0 ml
(pH=2.0)
33,COO(A1+3)
(pH adj. to 5.5)
25,000(A1+3)
5300
5300
NO TEST

NO TEST

2500
7000
NO TEST

5000
4000
30,000
Colorb
6500
3500
'
750

550






60



780
850
300
Sulfur Dyeing
Wastewater
Dosage3
-
10.0 ml
(PH=0.5)
30,000(A1+3)
(pH adj. to 5.5)
30,000(A1+3)
10,000
25,000
10,000
40
10,000
4
5000
10,000
5000
10,000
5000
5000
3500
Colorb
30,100
100

60

360

500
620

570

, 250

80

30,100
2000
1400
Combined Dyeing
Wastewater
Dosage3
-
6.0
(pH=1.0)
600 (A1+3)
(pH adj. to 5.5)
40(A1+3)
5000
4500
10,000
15
4000
4
2600
5000
3300
4000
4000
380
2000
Colorb
16,000
550

380

400

250
390

425

150

80

600
16,000
150
Biol. Treatment
Plant Effluent
Dosage3
-
40
(pH=1.0)
20(A1+3)
(pH adj. to 5.5)
SO TEST

1500
1500
15
1500
4
NO TEST

NO TEST

5000
250
1000
Colorb
1400
80

30



90
60

100





100
25
280
a Dosage as mg/1 and as destabilizing agent




b Color as APHA Pt. Co. Units
form denoted unless otherwise indicated.

-------
          Table 16.  AVERAGE RESULTS OF  SUCCESSFUL JAR TESTS ON
              EXISTING WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT EFFLUENT3
Parameter
Coagulant
Dosage0 (mg/1)
pH (Units)
Color (APHA Pt.
Co. Units)
BOD5/ (mg/1)
COD (mg/1)
Suspended
Solids (mg/1)
Waste-
Water

-
6.8

1216
57
165

123
A12S04-
18H?0

20(Al+3)
5.5

30
14
39

3
MgC03'3H20
& Ca(OH)?

15 & 1500
12.6

60
11
33

33
Ca(OH)9

2000
12.5

65
15
37

30
Ca(OH)2 & Anionic
Polyelectrolyte

1500 & 4
12.8

30
13
19

19
a Values within Table  respresent  the  average  of  five-days of testing de-
  signed to evaluate the various  coagulants'  effect on the wastestream's
  normal daily deviation resulting  from production variations.

  Coagulant dosage is  in form  denoted unless  otherwise indicated.
thirty liters of wastewater with  the previously established optimum co-
agulant dosages.  Upon  completion of the coagulation, flocculation, and
sedimentation cycles, the  supernatant was  carefully decanted.  The re-
maining sludge was poured  into  a  two-liter graduate and allowed to settle
for sixty minutes.  At  this time, the sludge volume was noted, the super-
natant again decanted,  and the  remaining sludge analyzed for density and
moisture content.  A minimum of three such tests were performed for each
coagulant.  The average of the  test results are tabulated in Table 17.

Alum Sludge Investigations

In reviewing the relative  sludge  characteristics, the primary disadvan-
tages associated with alum coagulation were the excessive sludge volume
and high moisture content.  In  an effort to produce a more favorable alum
sludge, a series of jar tests was performed to investigate the benefits
of several selected polyelectrolytes and coagulant aids.  The results of
these investigations which are  tabulated in Table 18 show an insignificant
improvement in sludge volume derived from  the coagulant aids investigated.
It is recognized, however, that the investigation of polyelectrolytes was
somewhat limited.  Although polyelectrolytes representative of the three
basic types (i.e., cationic, nonionic, and anionic)were investigated, it
must be acknowledged that  there are endless varieties of polyelectrolytes
available from the various manufacturers which might prove much more
beneficial in improving the sludge characteristics.
                                 47

-------
                   Table  17.  SLUDGE CHARACTERIZATION
Coagulant
A12(S04)3-
18H20
MgC03-3H20
& Ca(OH)2
Ca(OH)2
Ca(OH)2
& DOW A-23
	
Sludge Volume
after 60 min.
(% of total)
5.4
2.1
1.7
1.6
—-_______—
Sludge
Density
(gm/cnH)
1.001
1.003
1.027
1.012
Moisture
(%)
99.5
97.3
97.0
95.4
Estimated
Full Scale
Sludge Volume
(m3/hr)
1.85
0.72
0.56
0.56
1
Estimated
Full Scale
Dry Sludge
(kg/hr)
9.26
19.50
17.25
26.07
        Table  18.  SUMMARY OF ALUM SLUDGE REDUCTION INVESTIGATIONS3
Coagulant Aid

Activated Silica
Bentonite
Dow A-23
(Anionic Poly-
electrolyte)
Dow N-20
(Nonionic Poly-
electrolyte)
Dow C-41
(Cationic Poly-
electrolyte)
Fly Ash
(From C.T.M.
Inc. 's Boiler)
Dosage
(mg/1)
_
25
25


4


5


40


930°
.Sludge
Volume
(%Tot^
5.4
4.0
5.0


5.0


b


5.0


4.0
Supernatent
Susp. Solids
(mg/1)
16
2
8


28


80


28


40
COD
(mg/1)
62
80
62


23


47


54


18
Color
(APHA Ft. Co. Units)
30
30
20


30


20


20


80
a Alum Dosage:  20mg/l as Al+3

b Resulted in partial sludge flotation.

c Dosage is equivalent toquantity of fly ash available from mills
  boiler, per volume of wastewatef.
                                 48

-------
Further work in this area was beyond the scope of this phase of the pro-
ject; however, additional investigation is recommended prior to pilot
scale testing.

Coagulant Regeneration

The feasibility of coagulant regeneration and reuse was investigated in
a series of bench scale tests.  The procedures and the resulting conclu-
sions are summarized below:

Aluminum Sulfate (Alum) - Recovery of alum from waste sludge is simply a
     reversal of the precipitation process.  After preliminary thickening
     and/or dewatering, the sludge, consisting mostly of aluminum hydrox-
     ide, is treated with sulfuric acid.  The alum is regenerated accord-
     ing to the following reaction:

                 2A1(OH)3 + 3H2S04	—A12(S04)3 + 6H20              (03)

     Stoichiometrically, by calculating the weights of each of the two
     compounds, it may be determined that approximately 1.9 Ibs. of sul-
     furic acid is required to regenerate each pound of aluminum hydrox-
     ide.  Previous studies conducted on alum recovery^, have reported
     that adjustment of the pH to a range between 1.5 - 2.5 is necessary
     to insure complete conversion of the aluminum hydroxide to aluminum
     sulfate.

     The alum recovery investigations were performed on the sludge re-
     covered from 30 liter batch coagulation tests.  This sludge was
     collected in a two-liter graduate and acidified according to 1.9
     parts concentrated sulfuric acid per each part A1(OH)3 (calculated
     from the quantity of Al+3 present in the sludge) or to a minimum pH
     level of 1.5.  After approximately 15 minutes of agitation, the mix-
     ture was allowed to settle and the resulting supernatant decanted
     and analyzed for aluminum.  This supernatant was then utilized for
     subsequent coagulation tests.  The results of the alum regeneration
     investigations lead to the following discussion and conclusions:

     1.   Acidification of the sludges produced by alum coagulation did
          release alum in sufficient quantities for reuse.  The results
          from one of the more successful series of alum coagulation-
          regeneration investigations are provided in Table 19.  These
          results demonstrate the progressive loss of alum with each re-
          generation.  A mass balance of the aluminum ion (Al+3) present
          at the various stages of the regeneration process indicated
          that varying amounts of the aluminum were irreversibly tied up
          in the sludge.  A range from 15 to 60 percent of the initial
          aluminum addition was lost with each coagulation.  It is felt
          that the percentage of aluminum loss to the sludge is largely
          a function of raw wastewater quality (i.e., pH, hardness, color,
          etc.).  The degree of alum recovery for reuse in these investi-
                                  49

-------
                                      Table 19.  TYPICAL RESULTS OF ALUM REGENERATION —
                                                COAGULATION INVESTIGATIONS

Coagulant
Dosage
(mg/1 as Al+3)
20
20a
(1st Regen.)
20a
(2nd Regen.)
Total
Coagulant
Addition
(mg/as Al+3)
600
198

102

Total Coagulant
in Regenerated
Sludge Supernatant
(rag as AF"3)
297
136

87



% Alum
Recovery'3
49
22

14

Initial Wastewater

COD
(mg/1)
143
132

120


Color (APHA
Pt. Co. Units)
1650
2000

1600

Coagulant Su

PH
(units)
5.5
5.5

5.5


COD
(mg/1)
32
39

58
•r
ernatant

Color (APHA
Pt. Co. Units)
30
40

20

Ln
O
        a The volume of wastewater used for each successive coagulation test was reduced to permit constant
          Al+3 dosage.

        b Based on quantity of Al+3) added initially  (600 mg).

-------
           gations was also partially influenced by the failure to com-
           pletely dewater the final sludges after regeneration.  This
           loss was overcome by reducing the volume of each successive
           coagulation test in order to maintain a constant coagulant
           dosage.

      2.    Although the regenerated alum demonstrated the ability to re-
           move color at efficiencies comparable to that of the fresh alum,
           the settling properties of the sludge produced with each suc-
           cessive coagulation test progressively deteriorated.

      3.    The final sludge remaining after recovery of the alum was visu-
           ally observed to be much more gelatinous than the original alum
           sludge.  This might present problems in final dewatering steps.
           Other potential problem areas include the buildup of impurities
           in the recovered alum solution and operational problems associ-
           ated with acidification.

      4.    In reviewing the relative economics of the chemical costs alone
           as tabulated in Table 20, it appears that alum regeneration
           offers a very insignificant economic advantage.   It is recog-
           nized that there are numerous other economic factors that
           should be considered in evaluating the potential benefits of
           alum regeneration.   The results of the relative chemical costs,
           however,  indicate that regeneration of alum for this applica-
           tion is at best, marginal.   Further pilot scale testing is
           necessary to more closely define the alum recovery,  sludge de-
           watering requirements, and ultimate disposal considerations.
            Table  20.   RELATIVE ECONOMICS OF ALUM REGENERATION

                                                  Cost/m3    Cost/1000 Gal.

Estimated Cost of Aluma without Regeneration     $   1.50           $  5.67

Estimated Chemical  Cost with Regeneration
     Alum3  Cost @ 50%  make-up                       0.75             2.83
     Sulfuric Acidb Required for Regeneration       0.42             1.59
Estimated Chemical Savings with Regeneration
a Liquid Alum  (17% Al^Oa)  @  $68/metric  ton

b Sulfuric Acid (66°Be, 93%  H2S04>  @  $36/metric  ton
                                   51

-------
Magnesium Carbonate - Recovery of magnesium carbonate from waste sludge
     is accomplished by reacting the magnesium hydroxide component of the
     sludge with carbon dioxide.  This solubilizes the magnesium selec-
     tively as magnesium bicarbonate which may then be reclaimed from rh •
     filtrate in the dewatering process and returned for reuse in the co-
     agulation process^, 27,28.  The basic regeneration chemical reaction
     is:

                      Mg(OH)2 + 2C02	~*-Mg(HC03)2                  (04)

     To investigate the potential application of magnesium carbonate re-
     generation, a series of recovery tests was performed.  These inves-
     tigations utilized the sludge recovered from a thirty-liter batch,
     lime-magnesium carbonate coagulation test.  The sludge was collected
     in a graduate cylinder and the volume brought to two-liters with
     distilled water.  During agitation, laboratory grade carbon dioxide
     was introduced at a low rate until a pH level of 7.5 was reached.
     At this point, the remaining sludge was allowed to settle for ap-
     proximately three hours and the supernatant withdrawn for analysis
     and reuse.

     In this investigation, the magnesium source utilized was in the form
     of magnesium carbonate trihydrate (HgCO^- 3H20).  This is a relatively
     new coagulant and is not available commercially.  The basic carbon-
     ate - 4MgCC>3Mg(OH)2-5H20 - which is commercially available has a
     low solubility and is unsatisfactory for practical use as a coagu-
     lant^S.  in a full scale system, recovery of the naturally available
     magnesium from the water would be required for use as a coagulant.

     The results of the series of regeneration investigations indicated
     that approximately 50-70 percent of the magnesium content could be
     recovered through carbonation of the sludge.  The remaining portion
     of the magnesium was either lost in the supernatant or in the waste
     sludge.  The supernatant quality obtained through coagulation with
     regenerated magnesium bicarbonate was found to compare very favorably
     with that obtained utilizing the magnesium concentrations found in
     the wastewaters (1.5 to 3.0 mg/1 as Mg4"*").  It was concluded that
     magnesium bicarbonate regenerated from the sludges, could produce
     sufficient quantities to sustain the optimum coagulation require-
     ments.   Further evaluation of the potential full scale application
     led to consideration of the magnesium available as an impurity in
     commercial hydrated lime.  High purity reagent grade lime was
     utilized in the bench scale investigation.  The commercially avail-
     able hydrated lime utilized by Canton Textile Mills, Inc. for  fresh
     water treatment has a typical magnesium oxide content of 0.73  per-
     cent (by vaight).   Although this content may seem insignificant,  at
     the lime dosages required for this application  (1500 mg/1 as
     Ca(OH)2),  the magnesium addition from the lime  (4.38 mg/1 as Mg++per
     gram of lime)  is adequate to meet the magnesium requirements  for
     optimum coagulation.  Therefore, it was concluded that magnesium
     bicarbonate regeneration would not be required for  this  application.
                                  52

-------
     This magnesium regeneration process, however, might prove beneficial
     at other location^,

Lime - Recovery of waste lime sludges by recalcination has been practiced
     successfully for many years by  the pulp and paper industry.  Recent-
     ly, the lime recalcination process has also found application in the
     recovery of wastewater treatment lime sludges28.  The process of
     recalcination is accomplished by heating  the calcium containing
     sludges to temperatures ranging between 800 and  1100°C
     (1500-2000°F)30.  The basic reaction is as follows:
                       CaC03 -      „  Ca0 + C02                    (05)

     To evaluate the potential use of  lime recovery at Canton Textile
     mills, Inc., a series of batch recalcination tests was performed.
     The test sludge was recovered from thirty-liter batch coagulation
     tests and dewatered by oven drying at 103°C (217°F) for a period of
     24 hours.  The dried sludge was then ground to powder and fired at
     930°C (1700°F) for a period of five minutes.  Stoichiometrically, if
     total recovery of the calcium were possible, the addition of one gram
     of Ca(OH>2 should result in the recovery of 0.76 grams of CaO.  Total
     recovery is not practical and a portion of the final material after
     firing would be expected to be inert material removed from the waste-
     water.  Based only on a weight recovery comparison, the results of
     the batch recovery tests indicated that only 38 percent of the theo-
     retically possible recovery could be accomplished.  Considering the
     fact that a portion of the recovered material was inert matter and
     not CaO, it was concluded that the percentage recovery was actually
     somewhat less than 38 percent.  It was also noted that the super-
     natant water hardness was increased from an original 50 mg/1 as
     CaCC-3 to a final of 1400 mg/1 as  CaC03.  This indicated that much of
     the original calcium addition in  the lime was lost with the super-
     natant rather than precipitated.

     In considering the economic aspects of lime recalcination, it has
     been reported at the South Lake Tahoe wastewater plant that the cost
     of the lime recalcination is slightly greater than the cost of new
     lime29.  At this installation which has a design flow of
     28,4000 m3 per day, approximately seventy percent of the required
     CaO is recovered by recalcination of the lime sludges.  In view of
     these economic aspects, the scale of operation, and the preliminary
     CaO recovery indications, consideration for recalcination was aban-
     doned.

Sludge Filterability

To investigate the filterability of the various sludges, a series of
Buchner funnel tests was performed utilizing the test set-up illustrated
in Figure 14.  These tests were utilized to provide an indication of fil-
                                  53

-------
 tration  times  and  the  effect of various vacuum pressures.  Basically, this
 test  consisted of  applying  a selected vacuum  (25,  38, or  51  centimeters of
 mercury)  to  the funnel apparatus  covered with two  No. 4 Whatman  filter
 papers  (prewetted  to insure a vacuum seal) and containing exactly  200 mil-
 liliters  of  the test sludge.  After applying  a vacuum for a  predetermined
 period of time,  the filtrate was  analyzed for volume, color, pH, and COD.
 The filter cake was also  analyzed for percent solids although  it was
 recognized that the comparative moistures of  the cakes are unobtainable
 due to loss  of vacuum  before normal drying time^O.

 A more detailed description of the test procedure  is provided  in the Ap-
 pendix as Table A6 and the  results of the tests tabulated in Tables A7
 through  A10  also found in the Appendix.

 The results  of the Buchner  filter tests demonstrated the  ability of the
 lime-Dow A23 coagulation  process  to produce a sludge lending itself to
 dewatering by  vacuum filtration.   This was evident by the ability  of
 this  sludge  to form a  defined filter cake in  filtration times  of two
 minutes  or less.   The  other coagulants showed poor cake formation  at
 vacuum periods less than  six to eight minutes.  This was  important be-
 cause most conventional vacuum filtration equipment is manufactured with
 drum  speeds  of 1-10 minutes per revolution with a  typical 25-35  percent
 submergence.   Therefore,  the filter cake formation period is generally
 less  than 2.5  minutes-* 1.  In comparing the relative filter cake  solids
 concentrations,  the lime-Dow A23  coagulant again demonstrated  the  ability
 to produce a filter cake  having solids concentrations as  high  as 11 to
 15% at filtration  periods of two  minutes and  without vacuum  loss.  Alumi-
 num sulfate  produced a very poor  cake at filtration times less than six
 minutes with vacuum loss  soon after cake formation.

 Based upon these conclusions, a series of filter leaf tests  was  performed
 with  the  lime-Dow  A23  sludge.  The purpose of these tests was  to develop
 design data.   The  test leaf as illustrated in Figure 15 has  the  ability  to
 simulate  a vacuum  filter  in operation (i.e.,  submergence, drying,  and  re-
 moval of  the filter cake).  Another advantage of the filter  leaf is  that
 it  is possible to  use  the same filter media as might be utilized on  the
 full  scale vacuum  filter.   Thus,  in short, the results are more  representa-
 tive  of the  operation  of  a  plant  size vacuum  filter-^.

 The filter leaf were performed in accordance  with  the following  proce-
 dure:

 1.    The  filter  leaf assembly was submerged in the prepared  sludge and
      the  desired vacuum applied for a time period  corresponding  to the
     desired form  time (1 minute).

2.   The  leaf was  then removed from the sludge and brought  to  the  verti-
     cal position  for  a time corresponding to the  desired drying time
      (3 minutes).
                                  54

-------
          9cm. BUCHNER
                    O-VACUUM GAUGE
                    _V_
                                   at TO VACUUM PUMP
                             -NEEDLE  VALVE
                FILTER FLASK
        •Figure 14.  Buchner funnel test apparatus.
CLAMP-
                   VACUUM
                    GAUGE
         2 LITER
         BEAKER
   MAGNETIC
    STIRRER
            FILTER
            LEAF
            -CLOTH
               MAGNET
                                       TO VACUUM PUMP
                                      CLAMP
FILTER FLASK
          F.igure 15.  Filter leaf apparatus.
                          55

-------
3.   After drying, the vacuum was released and the filter cake carefully
     removed for analysis.

Based on the results of these filter leaf tests as tabulated in Table 21,
it was concluded that sludge resulting from lime-Dow A23 coagulation
could successfully be dewatered with vacuum filtration equipment having
a total cycle time of four minutes.  The investigations also indicated
that Eimco Filter Media, Style No. PO-801RF or NY-333 is best suited for
this application.
           Table 21.  RESULTS OF FILTER LEAF TEST WITH SLUDGE
                 GENERATED FROM LIME-DOW A23 COAGULATION
Basis of Test:   Sludge from Lime and Dow A-23 tests
                 Vacuum, cm Hg
                 Cycle time, min.
                 Form time, min.
                 Dry time, min.
38.1
4.0
1.0
3.0
                 Medium - all supplied by EIMCO

Medium
Style No.
PO-801RF
PO-802HF
POPR-854F
POPR-925F
NY-384F
NY-333
CO- 3
Initial
% Solids
5.08
7.01
7.36
6.03
5.07
4.24
6.34
Cake
% Solids
25.4
30.1
30.9
31.7
30.1
26.6
25.2
Filter Yield
Dry gm/hr/cm2
1.89
1.06
0.75
0.74
1.11
1.70
1.47
Filtrate
pH,
Units
11.5
11.3
11.3
11.5
11.4
11.5
11.4
Color,
(a )
80
10
30
210
180
120
110
COD,.
mg/1
127
93
108
100
111
203
258
a APHA Pt. Co. Units
                                    56

-------
FULL SCALE COST PROJECTIONS

Results of the bench scale coagulation  investigations  indicated  that co-
agulation of the wastewaters with lime  and Dow A-23 polyelectrolyte was
the most feasible approach due to the sludge dewatering properties.
Based on this treatment concept, preliminary flow diagrams and cost pro-
jections were prepared for incorporating  the,coagulation process into
the present wastewater treatment system.  The preliminary flow schematic
as provided in Figure 16, would require the addition of lime, polyelec-
trolyte, and sulfuric acid feed and storage systems; a vacuum filtration
system; modifications to the existing clarifier and digester; and the
related instrumentation and piping changes.  Preliminary estimates for
this chemical coagulation and sludge dewatering system indicate a capital
cost of $330,000 with a total operating coat (including the operation of
the existing system) of approximately 23.0$ per cubic  meter of raw waste-
water treated.  A breakdown of both capital and operating cost is pro-
vided in Tables 22 and 23.

In evaluating the chemical costs of the lime coagulation system, it was
concluded that the cost of lime and the subsequent sulfuric acid cost
required for final neutralization were  excessive.  Chemical costs alone
for the lime coagulation system would be  approximately 11.9$ per cubic
meter or $35,000 per year.

In considering the use of alum coagulation, the primary disadvantages en-
countered were the excessive sludge volume and related problems of de-
watering.  If a polyelectrolyte or suitable sludge conditioner could be
utilized to improve the alum sludge dewatering properties, a substantial
savings in chemical costs might be realized with alum  coagulation.  This
would be largely dependent on the costs associated with the sludge condi-
tioning agent.  Comparatively, the estimated chemical  cost of alum (at a
dosage of 20 mg/l.,as Al+3) is approximately 1.52)  at an estimated cost
of 5.8$ per cubic meter.  An additional chemical cost  of the alum sys-
tem, however, would be that of the acid (typically sulfuric) required to
adjust the wastewater pH to the optimum coagulation range (5.0-5.5) and
the subsequent readjustment of the pH level to a range of 6.0 to 9.0 for
final discharge or reuse.  The chemical cost associated with the alum
system would most likely still be significantly less than that of the
lime system which would require final pH  adjustment from 12.5 to 9.0 pH
units with sulfuric acid at a cost of approximately 5.6
-------
oo
  J£G£NJL

)PH CONTROLLER

)FLOW RECORDER

) LEVEL TRANSMITTER

) LEVEL ACTUATED SWITCH
                                                      MAKE-UP WATER-
                    WASTEWATER
          •DOMESTIC WASTEWATER
          -HOSPITAL WASTEWATER

                    PRE-AERAT10N TANK
                                                                  POLYMER
                                                                 DAY TANK

                                                    SLUDGE RETURN (624LPM)
                                                                  DRY POLYMER
                                                                  STORAGE (BAGS)
                                                                SLUDGE RET. PUMP
                                                                 IR LFT PUMP
                             AUGER FEED
                              MAKE-UP WATER

                             LIME SLURRY
                             DAY TANK
                                                         ACTIVATED
                                                         SLUDGE
                                                         AERATION
                                                         TANK
               718LPM5DAYSWK.
               I89LPM 2 DAYS WK.
                                                                                                BULK ACID
                                                                                                 STORAGE
 BAR SCREEN

'FftRSHALL FLUME
  GRIT CHAMBER
   SLIDE GATES
 IOLOGICAL
CLARIFIER
                                                               REACTOR

                                                                LARIFER
                                                            SUPERNATANT
                      LIFT STATION
                                                                                       CHLORINE
                                                                            EMERGENCY DRAIN
                                                                         VACUUM
                                                                         "W!
                      EMERGENCY BYBASS
               EQUALIZATION

                 BASIN
                                                          SLUDGE CAKE
                                                         TO LANDFILL
                               DISCHARGE
                              TOETOWAH
                                 RIVER
                             SPERNATANT


              Figure 16.   Flow diagram of treatment system with proposed chemical coagulation addition.

-------
    Table 22.  ESTIMATED CAPITAL COSTS OF.CHEMICAL COAGULATION SYSTEM
            ADDITION TO CANTON TEXTILE MILLS, INC.'S EXISTING
                      BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT FACILITY3
Modifications to Existing Clarifier & Digester                  $  32,500
     (Conversion to Reactor-Clarifier and Thickener)

Vacuum Filter Station                                              85,000
     (6* Dia. x 6' Drum with accessory drive, pumps,
     motors, sludge conveyor, installation, etc.)

Lime Storage and Feed System                                       42,850
     (45 ton bulk lime storage, auger feed, day tank,
     mixer, and slurry metering pump)

Polymer Feed System                                                 4,500
     (2-day tanks, mixer, and metering pump)

Bulk Acid  (H2SO^) Storage and Feed system                           6,000

Instrumentation                                                    15,000
     (pH and Flow)

Sludge Pumps                                                        7,500
     (Clarifier & Thickener)

Site Preparation                                                   15,000

Housing for Vacuum Filter, Polymer, and Lime Systems               37,500

Piping and Electrical                                           	84,150

          TOTAL                                                 $ 330,000
  Engineering News Record Cost Index  (1913 Baseline) = 2275.'
                                  59

-------
             Table 23.  PROJECTED OPERATING AND MAINTENANCE
                    COSTS FOR EXISTING BIOLOGICAL AND
                     NEW CHEMICAL COAGULATION SYSTEM3
 Chemical Costs for Coagulation System
  Hydrated Lime @ 38.6 $/metric ton                               5.8
  Dow A-23 Polyelectrolyte @ 1.10 per kilogram                    0.5
  Sulfuric Acid (66°Be, 93% H2S04) @ 36 $/metric ton              5.5

 Power Costs  (@ 2.5$/Kw-Hr)
  Biological System
  Coagulation System

 Total Operating Personnel and Maintenance Costs
               TOTAL
a Does not include cost for landfill disposal of sludge or value of
  treated effluent for reuse.
SUMMARY OF CHEMICAL DESTABILIZATION CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

The results of the chemical destabilization investigations led to the fol-
lowing conclusions and recommendations:

1.   Chemical destabilization of the effluent from the existing biologi-
     cal treatment system was found to be the most advantageous point of
     coagulant application.  This conclusion was based upon the demon-
     strated ability of the various destabilizing agents in accomplishing
     removal of color and the production of a high quality supernatant at
     practical levels of chemical addition.

2.   Of the eleven destabilizing agent combinations investigated, it was
     concluded that alum or lime with an anionic polyelectrolyte would be
     the two coagulants most feasible for application.

3.   Coagulation of the wastewaters with lime (at 1500 mg/1 as Ca(OH>2)
     and an anionic polyelectrolyte (Dow A-23 at 4 mg/1) demonstrated the
     ability to produce a sludge with superior dewatering characteristics
                                  60

-------
     in comparison to the characteristics of the sludge resulting from
     alum coagulation.  It was also demonstrated that the sludge result-
     ing from lime coagulation was amenable to dewatering with conven-
     tional vacuum filtration techniques.  Results of filter leaf tests
     indicated that vacuum filtration might be expected to produce a
     sludge cake with approximately 25 percent solids and have a filter
     yield of approximately  1.7 gm/hr/cm or 3.5 lbs/hr/ft2 (dry basis).

4.   Coagulation of the wastewater with alum (at 20 mg/1 as Al+3) resulted
     in the formation of a gelatinous sludge with poor dewatering charac-
     teristics.  Comparatively, alum coagulation resulted in a sludge
     volume of 5.4 percent (99.5% moisture) as opposed to a sludge volume
     of 1.6 percent (95.4% moisture) resulting from coagulation with lime
     and polyelectrolyte.  The results of Buchner filtration tests indi-
     cated that the alum sludge was not amenable to conventional vacuum
     filtration techniques.  Several representative polyelectrolyte
     (anionic, nonionic, and cationic) as well as several common coagu-
     lant aids (bentonite, activated silica, and fly ash) were investi-
     gated for use in conjunction with alum coagulation for improving the
     sludge dewatering characteristics.  These investigations proved
     relatively unsuccessful.

5.   The potential of coagulant (lime and alum) regeneration and recycle
     was investigated.  In each case, it was concluded that the percentage
     of coagulant recovery was insufficient to economically justify re-
     covery.

6.   In examining the economic aspects of the application of a full scale
     lime-anionic polyelectrolyte coagulation system, it was projected
     that the capital costs for incorporating the chemical coagulation
     and vacuum filtration processes into the existing biological system
     would require an expenditure of approximately $330,000.   The total
     operating cost including chemicals, power, maintenance,  and operating
     personnel was estimated to be approximately 22.8
-------
It is recommended that a series of bench scale tests be conducted to
examine additional polyelectrolytes and suitable sludge conditioners
that could be utilized to improve the dewatering characteristics of
the alum sludge.  Other dewatering techniques such as the centrifuge
or various gravity-type filters might also be investigated during
this phase of the investigation.  If these tests prove successful,
it is further recommended that the investigation be extended to a
pilot scale study.  The function of the pilot scale phase would then
be to provide indicative chemical cost and operational data for a
continuous flow svstem.
                             62

-------
                               SECTION VI

             NEUTRALIZATION OF CAUSTIC WASTEWATERS UTILIZING
                      COAL-FIRED BOILER FLUE  GASES
A common problem presently facing many  industries utilizing fossil-fired
boilers is that of meeting various compliance  regulations related to the
control of noxious gases and particulate emissions.  Removal of these
fractions of the flue gas through wet scrubbing  techniques often reduces
the air pollution problem only to create a water pollution problem.  The
intent of this phase of the research project was to investigate an inte-
grated solution to this problem whereby the acidic fractions of the flue
gas might be utilized to offset the causticity of the dyeing process
wastewaters.  Neutralization would, as  a result, create a wastewater
more readily amenable to biological degradation.
       »
The pH of a wastewater is a key factor  in the  growth of microorganisms
which are vital to the biological wastewater treatment process. General-
ly, the optimum pH level for biological growth lies between 6.5 and
7.5-".  Most organisms cannot tolerate  pH levels above 9.5 or below 4.0.
There are, however, some instances where wastewaters having pH levels
as high as 12.0 have been successfully  treated biologically due to the
ability of the microorganisms to produce weak  neutralizing acids.  At
Canton Textile Mills, Inc., the influent to the  biological treatment
system generally ranges from 10.0 to 12.0 pH units during dyehouse pro-
duction hours.  The wastestreams from the hospital, a residential section,
and the domestic wastes from the mill provide  much of the biological
life needed to properly seed the dyeing process  wastewaters for subse-
quent treatment.  Although the hospital and domestic wastestreams are
normally within the optimum pH ranges for the  biological growth, the
dyehouse discharge has pH levels in excess of  10.  Thus, when the three
streams are combined, the microorganisms receive a pH shock which either
kills them or greatly retards their ability to function normally. By
adjusting the pH level of the dyehouse  wastewater into the proper range
thereby reducing the pH shock, it was anticipated that the entire sys-
tem's efficiency could be improved.

RESEARCH OBJECTIVES

The primary objective of the research performed  in conjunction with this
phase of the project was to demonstrate the practicability of utilizing
coal-fired boiler flue gases to neutralize the causticity of Canton Tex-
tile Mills, Inc.'s dyeing process wastewaters.   The secondary objectives
included the following:

1.   Evaluate the effect of flue gas scrubbing on the physical and chem-
     ical properties of the wastewaters.

2.   Determine the effect of scrubber neutralization on the subsequent
     biological treatment system.
                                  63

-------
 3.   Appraise  the  efficiency of a  conventional wet  scrubber utilizing
     dyehouse  caustic wastewaters  as  the  scrubbing  media.

 4.   Investigate the feasibility of utilizing the scrubber installation
     to  permit the burning of  low  grade,  high sulfur  coal.

 During the  early stages of the project, the  fourth  objective  concerning
 the  use  of  low grade, high sulfur  coal was dropped  due  to the location of
 the  coal fields supplying high sulfur coal,  the  time  factor involved in
 rail transport, the volume required to be purchased,  and the  cost factor
 involved in obtaining this coal.

 NEUTRALIZATION PRINCIPLES

 The  neutralization technique investigated is based  primarily  upon the
 same principles employed by the conventional "dual  alkali" or "double
 alkali"  processes  of desulfurization.  These processes  utilize soluble
 sodium based alkali in the forms of sodium hydroxide  (NaOH),  sodum sul-
 fite (Na2S03),  sodium carbonate (Na2C03). or sodium bicarbonate  (NaHC03)
 to accomplish  sulfur dioxide absorption-*  .  The  main  overall  absorp-
 tion reactions are described by the following equations:

                2NaOH + S(>2	*-Na2S(>3 + H20                  (06)
                        S02+ H20^   "* 2NaHS03                       (07)
                        2S02 + H20	«- 2NaHS03  + C02                (08)
                Na2HC03 + S02	—*-NaHS03 + C02                  (09)

 Some carbon dioxide removal is also accomplished according to the follow-
 ing  reactions:

                2 NaOH + C02	—Na2C03 + H20                  (10)
                Na2C03 + C02 +  H20	*-2NaHC03                       (11)

 The  absorption of  carbon dioxide results  in  the  production of sodium
 species  capable of further reaction with  the sulfur dioxide fractions of
 the  flue  gas.  When these subsequent  reactions occur  in accordance with
 equations 08 and 09 previously provided,  the carbon dioxide is released.
 Thus, the extent of carbon dioxide absorption depends upon the efficiency
 of the desulfurization process.

 The desulfurization process results in the production of what is commonly
 referred  to as  "inactive sodium" or sodium bisulfite  and the  oxidation ,r
pro'duct sodium sulfate.  Both  of these compounds cannot be further  reac-
 ted with  the sulfur dioxide and must  be either regenerated or removed
 from the system.   This is typically accomplished by reacting  the scrub-
bing effluent with either^lime or  limestone  according to the  following
reactions^. '   -
                                   64

-------
     Lime
           Ca(OH)2 + 2NaHS03	—Na2S03 + CaS03-  ^H20 4 + 3/2 H20   (12)
           Ca(OH)2 + Na2S03 + %H20	*• 2NaOH + CaS02'%H2o4         (13)
           Ca(OH)2 + Na2S04 + H2 0	*• CaS04• 2H20t + 2NaOH         (14)

     Limestone
           CaC03 + 2NaHS03 + 5$H20    Na2S03 + CaS03'%H20^ + C02 + H20 (15)

Upon removal  of the insoluble species resulting from the  regeneration
process, the  regenerated active sodium is returned  to the scrubbing sys-
tem.  A much  more detailed examination of double alkali process is pro-
vided in the  Iiterature34,35,36.

The wastewaters resulting from Canton Textile Mills,  Inc.'s dyeing pro-
cess are particularly suited for use as a scrubbing solution in that they
contain "active sodium"  species present in the form of sodium hydroxide
and sodium sulfite.   Therefore, it  would appear that utilizing these
wastewaters as a scrubbing solution could accomplish the  dual purpose of
neutralization and  flue  gas desulfurization.

EXISTING BOILER SYSTEM

The boiler utilized for  the neutralization investigations was the coal-
fired standby unit  which is normally used during periods  of interrupted
natural gas service.   This boiler is a Combustion Engineering,  Inc.  C-E
Vertical Unit which was  constructed in 1959.   It is a 27  metric ton per
hour (60,000  Ib/hr)  boiler with a maximum pressure  of 14  kilograms per
square  centimeter  (200 psi).   The boiler furnace burns 3.18cm by 0.95cm
(1-1/4" x  3/8") coal fed by a spreader stoker at an approximate rate of
44 metric  tons/day.   A typical coal analysis  is provided  in the Appendix
as Table All.  The  boiler is equipped with a  Whirlex dust collector
which captures approximately 34 to  45 kilograms/hour  (75-100 Ibs/hr)  of
fly ash.   A typical profile of the  existing stack gases discharged to the
atmosphere is provided in Table 24.

The State  of  Georgia's Department of Natural  Resources has established
emission standards  applicable to Canton Textile Mills,  Inc.  for both
particulate and sulfur dioxide emissions.   These standards indicate that
the maximum particulate  emissions for an existing source  (with  a rated
heat input of 3.4 x 105  Kg-cal/min  or 80 x 106 BTU/hr)  shall not equal
or exceed  16.7 Kg/hr  (36.8 Ibs/hr).   The standards  for new sources with
a similar  capacity  is, however, approximately 6.4 Kg/hr (14 Ibs/hr)3?.
With the definite possibility that  more stringent secondary standards may
be adopted in the future,  it  was felt that it would be desirable for the
scrubber system utilized for  neutralization to have the additional capa-
bilities of providing for a 62% reduction of  particulate  emissions,
thereby allowing Canton  Textile Mills,  Inc. to be in  compliance with the
new source regulations.   The  maximum sulfur dioxide emissions applicable
for Canton Textile Mills,  Inc.  required that  sulfur dioxide emission shall
not equal  or  exceed 56.70 Kg/hr (125 Ibs/hr).   With an existing emis-
sion of 20.86 Kg/hr,  it  is evident  that as long as  the 0.8% sulfur coal
                                   65

-------
            Table 24.  TYPICAL PROFILE OF EXISTING STACK GAS



 Temperature, °C                                                       274

 Volume  (at  actual stack temperature), m3/min                         1164

 Volume  (at  standard  temperature and pressure) m3/min                  610

 Molecular Weight of  Flue Gas, grams/mole                            30.02

 Particulates, gm/m3                                                  0.42

 Sulfur  Dioxide, gm/m3                                                0.57

 Carbon  Dioxide, gm/m3                                                 162

 Carbon  Monoxide, gm/m3                                                  3

 Oxygen, gm/m3                                                         157

 Nitrogen Dioxide, mg/m3                                              3.38

 Nitrogen Monoxide, mg/m3                                            10.16

 Fuel Rate (at normal operating conditions), Kg-cal/min x 10°         0.22
is utilized, there should be no problem in meeting the sulfur dioxide reg-
ulations even without any further reduction within the proposed scrubber
system.

NEUTRALIZATION PILOT PLANT INVESTIGATIONS

The practicabaility of the neutralization concept was first investigated
in a pilot-scale installation.  The objectives of this phase of the in-
vestigation were as follows:

1.   Establish preliminary projections of the liquid-gas ratio required
     for optimum neutralization of the caustic dyeing wastewaters.

2.   Investigate the potential effects of flue gas scrubbing on the
     characteristics of the wastewater.

3.   Obtain preliminary information related to the efficiency of  flue  gas
     scrubbing with the dyeing process wastewaters.
                                  66

-------
Description of Pilot Plant

The pilot plant investigation was  performed with a wet  scrubber test model
available through Zurn Air Systems.   This  unit  as shown in Figure  17,  is a
medium-energy, impingement type wet  scrubber capable  of handling 56.6
standard cubic meters per minute  (2000 scfm) with a pressure  drop  range of
5 to 24cm (water column).  In this unit, the flue gas is impacted  with the
scrubbing media as the high velocity gases pass through the slat between
the inlet bonnets and collecting  tubes.  The shearing actions of the gases
atomize the liquid into  a dense spray with cyclone spinning and mixing
continuing as the gas-liquid mixture progress up the  collecting tube.
Final separation of the  liquid and gas is  accomplished  by impingement  upon
the flooded surface of a deflector.   The gases  then continue  upward,
exiting through the discharge plenum, while the liquid  is returned to  the
hopper through a sealed  leg.  The  final treated liquid  is discharged from
the bottom of the hopper.
    . .-* •",
     ~*.:'
Pressure drop across the unit is  automatically  maintained by  controlling
the liquid level in the  hopper with  a differential pressure switch which
activates a solenoid valve on the  liquid makeup line.
            ,>  "• • •   •*         > •  i                   z
Neutralization Investigations

In the initial series of pilot scrubber investigations,  the gas  flow was
held relatively constant while varying the liquid wastewater  flow  through
the system.  The pilot scrubber system was allowed to operate continuously
over a period of three to six hours  for each test condition (liquid waste-
water flow rate) to assure attainment of operational  equilibrium.  During
the test period, the pH  of both influent and effluent were monitored to
provide an indication of the degree  of neutralization obtained at  each
liquid to gas ratio.  The degree  of  neutralization (expressed as the pilot
scrubber effluent pH) achieved for various liquid to  gas ratios  is shown
graphically in Figure 18.  Two separate plots over identical  liquid to gas
ratios were developed to demonstrate the changing characteristics  of the
wastewater.  Based on an average  dyeing process wastewater flow of approx-
imately 568 liters per minute (150 gpm) and a typical gas flow rate of
1165 actual cubic meters per minute  (41,130 acfm),  a  full scale  system was
projected to have a liquid to gas  ratio of approximately 0.49 1/m3.  By
interpolation, it was projected that a full scale system under similar •
operating conditions might be expected to  achieve a reduction of the
wastewater pH from a typical pH range of 10.5 to 12.0 units to a final pH
level of approximately 8.0 units.  It was, therefore, concluded that
scrubber neutralization  was  feasible.  Because  it was felt desirable to
have the capacity of achieving a  slightly  greater degree of neutralization
in the full scale system, the decision was made to utilize a  slightly  dif-
ferent scrubber configuration allowing more efficient gas scrubbing.
                                   67

-------
                   GAS OUTLET
                   SCRUBBING MEDIUM
                   DEFLECTOR

                   •TUBE SHEET
                   SEALED LEG
                   COLLECTING TUBE
                   INLET BONNET
                   SCRUBBING MEDIUM
                   INLET
                   SLURRY DRAIN
Figure 17. Neutralization pilot plant
            68

-------
I
CO
CO
      8.5
      8.0
      7.5
7.0
  4
      8.0
      7.0
6.0
      5.0
                 vt. L/G RATIO
                               ©
                          I
      JBBER INFLUENT pH'll-12 UNITS
JGAS FLOW RATE'83.5 ACTUAL
 M7MIN
 PRESSURE DROP' 9cm(W.C.)
 TEST PERIOD'JAN.4-9,1973
      I         I      ,  I
                O.I       0.2      0.3      0.4      0.5      0.6
                 L/G (LITERS PER MIN./ACTUAL M3 PER MIN.)
               pH vs. L/G RATIO
                          SCRUBBER INFLUENT pH-IO.5-11.5
                              FLOW RATE'83.5 ACTUAL
                            INSURE DROP' 9cm(W.C.)
                       TEST PERIOD* JAN.I6 - FEB.J5.I973
                OH      0.2     "03     0.4      0.5
                 L/G (LITERS PER MIN./ACTUAL M5 PER MIN.)
 Figure  18.   Pilot plant effluent pH vs.  liquid/gas ratio.
                                69

-------
 Pilot Scrubber Efficiency Investigations

 To investigate the relative scrubbing efficiencies  with respect to parti-
 culate and sulfur dioxide removals,  a series  of tests  was  performed to
 monitorjthese parameters  across  the  pilot scrubber.  For this investiga-
 tion, a liquid to gas ratio of 0.45  l/rtr was  selected  to closely approxi-
 mate that of the full scale application.   The results  of these tests in-
 dicated that the pilot scrubber  was  capable of achieving; an average of 75%
 reduction of particulate  matter  and  an average sulfur  dioxide removal of
 approximately 40%  at a pressure drop of 9cm  (w.c.).   It was therefore
 concluded that a conventional  wet scrubber on the full scale application
 would be capable of achieving  in excess of the desired particulate reduc-
 tion of 62% necessary to  meet  the new source  emission  standards.
                               " •>,,,
 Effect of Flue Gas Scrubbing on  Wastewater Characteristics
 The potential effects  of  flue  gas••<•<
 Most of  the parameters examined  showed  an increase in concentration    ,
 across the  pilot scrubber.   A  portion of this increase was  attributed to
 vaporization loss in the  effluent  gas stream.  The gas entered the pilot
 scrubber(at approximately 260°C  and exited at approximately 60°C at a
 saturated condition";,.  Several  parameters concentration increases were,
 however,\attributed directly to  the removal of these various  constituents
 from the!flue gas.  Both  the color and  suspended  solids  concentration
 increases were felt to be the  result of fly ash removal  from the flue gas.
 The sulfate increase was  related to the oxidation of theivarious sulfite
 species  present  in the wastestream.   The COD and  BOD^ increases respec-
 tively were believed to be related to the organic carbon present: in the
 fly ash  and the  production of  oxidizable chemical species such as sulfites
which would result in  an  increased oxygen consumption thereby introducing
 error into  the BODq test.              ?l              ~~\v^    /»;
                   •J                      *-.                      -03
         ;                                               •;       ''&
Two metals,  nickel and zinc, showed particularly  large increases in con-
centration  across the  sorubber.  Previous studies related to metals
present  in  desulfurization sludges38 at several much larger installa-
 tions  have  not reported; similar  increases in nickel  and  zinc.  It is
postulated  that  a major portion  of the  increased  concentrations might be
attributed to the. corrosion  of the metals in the  pilot scrubber installa-
tion.  Corrosion of galvanized steel as used for  much of the piping and
duct work of  the pilot unit  results in  the liberation of zinc.  Also, it
is  common for a  galvanic  reaction  to occur between dissimilar metals such
as  galvanized steel of the duct  and piping and stainless steel of the
pilot  scrubber.   This  reaction could possibly release nickel.  In short,
it was concluded that  nickel and zinc concentration  increases of these
levels were not  attributed to  the  flue  gas scrubbing.
                                   70

-------
                 Table 25.   WASTEWATER CHARACTERIZATION
                         /ACROSS PILOT SCRUBBER3
Parameter
pH, Units
Temperature, °C
Total alkalinity, mg/1 as Ca2C03
Total Hardness, mg/1
Color, APHA Pt. Co. Units
COD, mg/1
BOD5, mg/1
Suspended Solids, mg/1
Sulfates, mg/1
Metals
Cadmium, yug/1
Chromium, ^ug/1
Copper , /ig/ 1
Iron, /ig/1
Lead, ,/ug/l
Manganese , yug/ 1
Nickel, yig/1
Zinc, /ig/1
Scrubber Feed
11.2
30.0
710
35
4375
922
259
212
78

35
520
100
550
110
40
330
296
Scrubber Discharge
7.7
42.5
210
25
5187
1046
302
396
400

35
660
230
11700
110
245
1260
2570
a Data developed at a liquid to gas ratio of 0.45 1/m3 (actual)
  corresponding to the possible full scale application.
                                    71

-------
 In  evaluating  the cummulative effects of flue gas scrubbing on the waste-
 water,  there seemed  to be several problems associated with increased con-
 centration  levels of certain parameters.  It was felt, however, that
 these increases were insignificant and would not cause problems in the
 biological  treatment system.

 FULL SCALE  SCRUBBER  INSTALLATION

 In  the  selection of  the full scale scrubber equipment, consideration was
 given to operational flexibility and potential scrubbing efficency as
 well as the relative economics.  The medium energy, impingement type
 scrubber demonstrated the ability to achieve neutralization of the waste-
 waters  to a pH of approximately 8.0 at the liquid to gas ratio equivalent
 to  the  full scale application.  To allow for flexibility of operation and
 provide additional neutralization capacity if required, a scrubber con-
 figuration  more readily lending itself to gas absorption was selected for
 use in  the  full scale application.  As a result, a venturi type, medium
 energy  (15  to  30cm, w.c.) scrubber manufactured by the FMC/Link-Belt Cor-
 poration was purchased.  This system as shown schematically in Figure 19,
 provides a  venturi flow constriction with an adjustable wedge to control
 the pressure drop and particle impaction area.  The scrubbing liquid is
 injected into  the gas stream through spray pipes just ahead of the venturi
 constriction.  As the liquid-gas mixture enters the venturi constriction,
 the gas is  accelerated to a high velocity atomizing the scrubbing liquid
 and causing numerous collisions between the liquid droplets and particulate
 matter  within  the gas stream.  The flooded elbow connecting the venturi and
 liquid  separator sections provides for additional collision, impaction, and
 agglomeration  of the gas-liquid mixture.

 The incorporation of spray pipe liquid injection was of particular impor-
 tance for this application due to the presence of cotton fibers in the
 wastewater  scrubbing liquid.  By utilizing 1.3cm (% inch) diameter spray
 pipes rather than small orifices or spray nozzles typical of many other
 installations, it would be possible to reduce if not eliminate the poten-
 tial plugging  problems.  Another important consideration in this scrubber
 design  was  the operational flexibility afforded by the adjustable wedge
 shaped  throat  insert.  By raising and lowering this wedge, it is pos-
 sible to maintain a constant pressure drop and subsequently a consistent
 operational performance even with greatly reduced boiler loads as is
 often experienced on weekends and third shifts.

 The full scale scrubber process design as shown in the flow diagram pro-
vided as Figure 20 with photographs provided in Figures 21 and 22,
allowed for a potential liquid to gas ratio of 0.97 1/m-*  (actual) at
 the peak gas flows.  This high ratio was achieved by providing the capa-
bility of scrubbing liquid recirculation.  The capability of adjusting
both the percentage of recirculation and the liquid to gas ratio was  pro-
vided to allow additional operational flexibility and to assure achieve-
ment of the desired degree of neutralization.  Another feature incorpora-
ted into the full scale application for flexibility of operation was  the
                                   72

-------
 DIRTY GAS
 SCRUBBING
  LIQUID
    1
                  PARTICAL IMPACTION ON
                  ATOMIZED LIQUID
                  DROPLETS

                  INSERT MOVES
                  UP AND DOWN

                  FUTHER COLLISION AND
                  AGGLOMERIZATION OF
                  LIQUID DROPLETS

                 *-TO LIQUID  GAS
                  SEPARATOR
Figure 19.  FMC/Link Belt variable throat scrubber.
                 73

-------
                                                 FLUE GAS
                                                FROM BOILER
                      MILL
     LEGEND

   PH RECORDER

   LEVEL CONTROLLER

FR)FLOW RECORDER

   FLOW SWITCH

   DAMPER OPERATED

   SOLENOID VALVE
WASTEWATER
FROM DYEING
PROCESS
     WASTEWOTER
     MAKE-UP FROM	
     EQUALIZATION BASIN
     (0-1100 LITERS/MINO
          ExisovE
          COLLECTION
           MANHOLE
            TREATMENT  PLANT
                 Figure  20.   Process flow diagram of scrubber installation

-------
:
                   Figure 21.  Distant
view of canton Textile Hill.. Inc.,s scrubber InstaUatlo,

-------
Figure 22.   Close-up of Canton Textile Mills, Inc.'s
                scrubber installation


-------
capability of utilizing the wastewater  from  the equalization basin as a
scrubbing liquid during the periods of  low dyehouse production and week-
ends.

Prior to the addition of the scrubber system, fresh water was utilized
for sluicing the fly ash collected in the existing Whirlex dust collector
of the coal fired boiler.  Fly ash and  watea were then sent straight to
the receiving stream without treatment.  In  conjunction with the upgrading
work performed on the biological treatment system, this wastewater was
diverted into the waste treatment system providing for the removal of fly
ash within the equalization basin.  To  conserve both fresh water and re-
duce the hydraulic loading on the biological system, provisions were made
within the scrubber system to utilize the scrubber discharge wastewaters
for this purpose.

The potential need for a demister was considered, but concluded -as un-
necessary.  The FMC Corporation indicated that the open design, with no
internal sieve plates, baffles, or demisters present was important in
avoiding potential plugging and scaling problems.  Also, it was felt that
sulfuric acid mist would not be a significant problem for this size ap-
plication.

Upon initial system startup, several operational problems were encoun-
tered.  Below is a brief outline of the basic problems and steps taken to
correct them:

1.   A severe plugging problem was encountered in several of the pumps
     due to the presence of cotton fibers in the wastewater.   This pro-
     blem was temporarily solved by placing  a screen ^basket around the
     initial scrubber system intake pipe in  the dye collection manhole.
     A more permanent solution to this  problem is presently being inves-
     tigated with the possible use of a hydrasieve or mechanically
     cleaned screen prior to the scrubber system.

2.   The presence of surface-active agents in the dyeing wastewaters
     produced an unsightly foaming problem in the scrubber sump.   Other
     than the problem created by the overflowing foam, the foam created
     a false liquid level reading by the capacitance level detector al-
     lowing the sump to be pumped dry and in turn activating the safety
     shower and deactivating the fan.   This problem was solved by util-
     izing a defoamer additive injected into the scrubber feed from the
     dye retention basin.

3.   In the initial design, all pH probes were equipped with ultrasonic
     cleaners to prevent fouling of the probe.   Even with the ultrasonic
     cleaners,  fouling of the various probes has been a continuous
     trouble area.   Another major trouble area experienced with submerged
     pH probe assemblies is that of obtaining a proper liquid seal.  The
     instrument used for this application utilized an 0-ring pressure
     seal which has failed on numerous occasions permitting liquid seep-
                                  77

-------
      age  into  the probe assembly.  In future installations, consideration
      should  be given  to the use of a different type of pH monitoring
      equipment.

 4.    The  initial scrubber installation utilized an existing carbon steel
      stack with no mist eliminator.  Sul^furic acid mist was not felt to
      be problem with  acid mist emissions ranging from 0.04 to 2.27 kilo-
      grams per hour.  A slight temperature change of the gas exiting the
      stack,  however,  resulted in the condensation of water droplets.
      These water droplets then reacted with the remaining sulfur dioxide
      in the  gas to form a severely corrosive liquid.  To solve this pro-
      blem, several alternatives are under consideration.  One common
      method  utilized  to counteract this problem is the use of a flue gas
      reheater.  Reheating of the flue gas is typically accomplished by
      several methods  consisting of direct-fire, flue-gas bypassing, steam
      injection, or recuperative transfer (transfer of heat from inlet gas
      to outlet gas through the use of a heat exchanger).  Another alterna-
      tive and  the one under consideration at present is the selection of
      a corrosion resistant stack.  The use of a fiberglass stack compati-
      ble  to  the material construction of the scrubber separator is felt
      to offer  the most economical alternative for this application.

 FULL  SCALE SCRUBBER EVALUATION

 The full  scale scrubber installation successfully demonstrated the ability
 to neutralize  the wastewater, reduce the particulate and sulfur dioxide
 emissions, and to do  so without any detrimental effect on the biological
 treatment system.

 Neutralization of the wastewaters was readily accomplished with the full
 scale scrubber system.  The scrubber demonstrated the ability of re-
 ducing the wastewater pH to levels as low as 4.5 pH units.  The addition-
 al neutralization capacity of the venture scrubber proved, however, to be
 in excess of the design expectations resulting in the over neutralization
 of the wastewaters into the acidic pH ranges.  Various scrubber opera-
 tional conditions were tested in an attempt to produce higher scrubber
 effluent  pH  levels.   A summary of the various operational variations and
 effects are presented in Table 26.  The results of this testing demon-
 strated that over the feasible system operating variables, it was not pos-
 sible to  consistently maintain a desired scrubber effluent pH of 7.5-8.0
 units.  Thus,  it was  apparent that a reduction must be made in either  the
 volume of gas  processed with the scrubber or the volume of the wastewaters
 neutralized.   Because it was desirable to process the entire gas volume
 to achieve a particulate reduction, the decision was made  to reduce the
 volume of caustic wastewater utilized for scrubbing  thereby allowing  a
 portion of the  caustic wastewaters to be used to readjust  the  scrubber
 effluent  pH.   It was  determined experimentally that by reducing  the
wastewater volume utilized for scrubbing to 230 liters/min (60  gpm) and
 by using  a minimum scrubbing rate of 380 1/min  (100  gpm) or a  recircu-
 lation factor  of approximately 160%, the excess caustic wastewater was
                                   78

-------
                        Table 26.   TYPICAL RESULTS OF VARIOUS SCRUBBER OPERATING CONDITIONS
System
Effluent
Flow
(1/min)
756
756
756
680
680
680
529
529
529
227
227
227
Scrubbing
Liquid
Flow Rate
(1/min)
983
983
756
1096
756
567
945
756
680
983
756
378
Flue Gas
Volumetric Flow
(act. m3/min)
519
598
963
436
452
847
496
673
531
1146
836
925
L/G
(1/m3)
1.66
1.64
0.78
2.54
1.67
0.67
1.90
1.12
1.28
0.86
0.90
0.41
System
Influent pH
(units)
11.2
11.2
11.1
11.0
10.9
10.4
11.0
11.1
11.0
10.8
10.4
10.8
Scrubbing
Liquid pH
(units)
8.9
8.2
8.0
7.8
7.4
"-" 10.0
7.5
7.5
7.9
6.3
6.2
9.6
System
Effluent pH
(units)
7.1
6.6
6.3
6.5
6.6
6.6
**
6.7
6.5
6.8
5.3
4.5
6.0
System
Pressure
Drop
(cm -w.c.)
17.8
25.4
22.6
25.4
24.9
25.4
15.2
25.4
15.2
25.4
25.4
25.4
VO

-------
 capable  of maintaining an influent wastewater treatment system pH of 7.5
 to  8.0.  With  these operating conditions, it was also possible to utilize
 a small  volume of  the neutralized, equalization basin wastewaters as make-
 up  for the scrubber system during short periods of dyehouse non-production
 and without  a  significant decline in the pH levels of the influent of the
 biological system.  It is, however, doubtful that the scrubber operation
 with  the equalization basin wastewaters could be utilized for periods
 extending over a day without a significant decline in the pH level of
 the equalization basin effluent.  With the present production schedule of
 the mill, the  scrubber system could be operated continuously during the
 five  day dyehouse  production period then turned off during the weekend
 period of low  boiler loading.

 Similar  to the pilot study, an evaluation of the wastewaters across the
 scrubber system showed concentration increases for several parameters.
 Typical  profiles of the influent and effluent to the scrubber system at
 two separate operating conditions are provided in Table 27.  In comparing
 the full scale system with the pilot results, the larger increases in
 concentration  were attributed to the increased recirculation rate, higher
 scrubber efficiency, as well as the concentration effect resulting from
 evaporation  loss in the exit gas.  Again, the increased concentration of
 both  COD and TOC was attributed to the unburned organics within the fly
 ash.  This conclusion is substantiated by a comparison of the soluble
 values for COD and TOC.  While the total COD and TOC increased considera-
 bly,  the soluble form (with the fly ash removed) remained relatively con-
 stant.   The  increase in BOD concentrations were again concluded to be the
 result of a  high oxygen demand created by the increased sulfite concen-
 tration.  The  fact that the soluble 8005 values across the scrubber is
 relatively constant was attributed to the increased oxidation of the
 wastewater during  the filtration phase of the soluble test.  Unlike the
 results  of the pilot scale scrubber, the increases in the metal concen-
 trations were  considerably lower.  The nickel and zinc concentrations
 which caused concern in the pilot application were much lower in the full
 scale application.  This supported the previous conclusions regarding the
 release  of nickel  and zinc resulting from galvanic corrosion.  Iron con-
 tinued to show a large increase in concentrations across the scrubber;
 however, these concentrations were not felt to be detrimental to the
 wastewater treatment.

 As  expected, the full scale scrubber proved to have a much higher effi-
 ciency than  the pilot scrubber for both sulfur dioxide and particulate
 removal.  The  scrubber demonstrated the ability to successfully remove
 from 80 to 90% of  the incoming particulate.  This resulted in exit
 gas particulate emission ranging from 0.9 to 3.0 Kg/hr.  (2 to 6.6 Ibs/hr.)
which is well  below the Georgia Department of Natural Resource's new
 source standard of approximately 6.4 kg/hr (14 Ibs/hr.).  Liquid to gas
 ratios ranging from 2.5 to 15.4 l/m^ (actual) were evaluated as to their
effect on particulate removal; however, there seems to be no correlation
readily evident.   It is estimated that the total particulate removal  in-
cluding that of the Whirlex dust collector is approximately 94-98%.
                                  80

-------
                                    Table 27.  TYPICAL WASTEWATER CHARACTERIZATIONS
                                              ACROSS FULL SCALE SCRUBBER
Scrubber Operating Conditions

  Scrubber Effluent Flow Rate, liters/min
  Scrubbing Liquid Flow Rate, liters/min
  Pressure Drop, en (w.c.)
605
850
 23
Parameter
pH, units
Phenol. Alkalinity
Total Alkalinity
Acidity
COD
COD (soluble)
BOD 5
BOD5 (soluble)
TOC
TOC (soluble)
Total Solids
Total Volatile Solids
Suspended Solids
Suspended Volatile Solids
Calcium
Chromium
Copper
Iron
Manganese
Magnesium
Nickel
Zinc
Units

mg/1 as CaCO<}
mg/1 as CaCOj
mg/1 as CaC03
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
/ig/1
>JgA
JUg/1
Alg/1
JUg/1
/lg/1
^/lg/1
yUg/1
Scrubber
Influent
11.2
640
957
0
1338
1239
579
629
720
450
3681
614
117
1 91
8.1
-
-
527
-
3.68
—
351
Scrubber
Effluent
6.3
0
342
520
1732
1372
824
666
1167
437
4128
801
180
115
4.9
-
-
7833
-
4.43
—
332
Scrubber
Influent
10.4
260
584
0
1067
-
482
-
170
-
:;
72
158
72
9850
BDLa
58
412
40
230
70
78
Scrubber
Effluent
5.7
0
110
520
4603
-
1815
-
610
-
-
872
2347
648
11725
91
355
28175
150
370
205
378
227
378
 25
 a BDL - Below atonic adsorption spectrophotometer detection limit.

-------
The  scrubber was capable of achieving as high as 76% sulfur dioxide re-
moval while reducing the scrubber effluent pH to a level of 4.5 to 5.0.
In order to achieve the desired neutralization effect  (pH >7), it was,
however, necessary to reduce the sulfur dioxide removal efficiency to
approximately 29%.  The full scale scrubber's capacity for sulfur diox-
ide  removal was found to be a function of the scrubbing liquid's pH
level as shown in Figure 23 and also indirectly a function of  alkalinity.
                    ij ^\                                                 ^
It has been reportedjy that S02 removal is also a function of  the liquid
to gas ratio.  Attempts to derive a correlation between scrubber dis-
charge pH and scrubbing liquid to gas ratios as was found with the pilot
system were impractical due to the numerous variables influencing the
absorption of sulfur and carbon dioxide.  Frequent variations  in the
alkalinities of the wastewater resulted in a wide scrubber effluent pH
range at constant wastewater conditions.  Also it was found that the
flue gas flow was subject to wide variations of both flow rate and com-
position.  With the excess air of the flue gas ranging to as high as
200% (typical excess air for this type of boiler is normally 30-50%),
the  concentration of both carbon dioxide and sulfur dioxide were observed
to vary quite dramatically.  This variation of concentration in turn has
a quite pronounced effect on the efficiency of the absorption  reaction.
Another factor contributing to the system variables is the degree of oxi-
dation of the wastewater prior to scrubbing. The concentration of one of
the  "active sodium" species (^2803) is inversely related to the degree
of oxidation of the wastewaters prior to scrubbing.

Effect Of Neutralization On The Biological Treatment System

Assessment of the true effects of neutralization on the performance of
the  biological treatment system was somewhat hindered by frequent incon-
sistencies of the wastewater characteristics resulting from dyehouse pro-
duction trends and the influence of heavy rainwater infiltration.  Evalu-
ation of the relative effects of neutralization on a daily basis proved
erratic and relatively unsuccessful; however, when averaged over several
weeks of monitoring, it was observed that neutralization did aid the bio-
logical treatment process.  The comparative averages of the monitoring
results of the system with and without neutralization as provided in
Table 28 led to the following conclusions:

1.   Other than in the parameters directly related to flue gas scrubbing
     (pH, alkalinity, and the various solids parameters), it appears that
     the effect of flue gas scrubbing on the total influent wastewater  is
     relatively insignificant.  In most cases, it is extremely difficult
     to attribute any change of the average influent wastewater parameters
     directly to flue gas scrubbing.

2.   Neutralization did increase the efficiency of the biological treat-
     ment system with respect to BODs, COD, and TOG removal.   This  in-
     creased efficiency was directly related to an increased mixed  liquor
     volatile suspended solids concentration (MLVSS).  With neutraliza-
     tion,  it was possible to maintain a maximum MLVSS concentration
     within the aeration basin of approximately 2400 mg/1 as opposed  to
                                  82

-------
                                           Table 28.  COMPARATIVE WASTEWATER TREATMENT CHARACTERIZATION WITH

                                           AND WITHOUT SCRUBBER NEUTRALIZATION OF DYEING PROCESS WASTEWATERS
Parameter
pH (units)
P. Alkalinity
M. Alkalinity
Acidity
Hardness
COD
BOD
TOC
Sulfate
Total Solids
Total Volatile Solids
Suspended Solids
Volatile Suspended
Solids
Dissolved Solids
Iron
Zinc
Calcium
Magnesium
Units

(mg/1 as CaO>3)
feg/1 as CaC03)
(mg/1 as CaCOj)
(mg/1 as CaCOo)
(mg/1)
(mg/1)
(mg/1)
(ng/1)
(mg/1)
(mg/1)
(mg/1)
(mg/1)

(mg/1)
(mg/1)
(mg/1)
(mg/1)
(mg/1)
Influent to Treatment Plant
W/0 Scrubber*
Neutral.
9.6
172
486
0
' 50
585
305
179
53
1241
195
115
81

90
1.35
0.082
12.0
3.6
W/Scrubberb
Neutral.
7.1
0
206
86
26
696
264
191
248
992
220
256
150

736
2.34
0.09
4.44
2.52
Effluent From Equal. Basin
W/0 Scrubber
Neutral.
8.6
14
351
0
50
479
281
137
184
987
171
90
65

897
1.69
0.12
13.5
3.2
W/Scrubber
Neutral.
7.1
0
210
39
31
439
205
115
152
823
170
100
66

751
1.64
0.11
7.34
2.34
Final Treat. Plant Efflu.
W/0 Sc.rubber
Neutral .
7.4
0
220
14
29
226
87
84
482
985
125
104
68

881
0.84
0.13
13.3
3.1 '
W/ Scrubber
Neutral.
6.8
0
82
18
25
188
42
54
389
801
158
85
70

678
1.17
0.15
5.23
2.38
09
U>
Flow (liters/min)
Average Daily Indigo Dye Range Production During Sample Period
Average Daily Sulfur Dye Range Production During Sample Period
Average Daily Total Dyehouse Production During Sample Period

(Kg/day)
(Kg/day)
(Kg/day)
945
20,040
4,320
24,360
1085
18,820
8,390
27,210
           All  analyses were  performed on 24  hour  composite samples.


           a Average results  of  dally monitoring performed during period April 9-15, 1975 on system without neutralization


           b Average results  of  daily monitoring performed during the period March 5-18 and April 24- May 1, 1975 on system with scrubber
             neutralization during 5-day dyehouse  production.

-------
oo
   90h


   80


   70


   60


   50


§  40

LJ
^  30
 M
8   20


     10


     0
                                                                 L/G*0.67*
                                                 APi25cm.(W.C.)
                                                 * LITERS/ACTUAL CUBIC
                                                  METERS PER MIN.
                                                1
                              67        8        9        10
                                   SCRUBBING LIQUID pH (UNITS)
                                                      II
                         Figure 23.  Percent S02 removal vs. pH of scrubbing liquid.

-------
                               *
      1800 mg/1 without.  It was concluded that the neutralized wastewaters
      produced a more favorable climate for biomass growth and reproduc-
      tion.

 3.    With neutralization, the final effluent wastewaters were less buf-
      fered as measured by the alkalinity and acidity.  Being less buf-
      fered is advantageous because this reduces the chance of influencing
      tha pH level of the receiving streamf  "              '      ;\

 4.    The removal of particulates from the flue gas resulted' in elevated
      suspended solids levels in the influent.  These suspended solids,
      however, are removed within the equalization basin  and do not in-
      fluence the biological system.  These solids primarily consist of
      fly ash which will eventually necessitate removal from the 'equali-
      zation basin.
        --.                                                       ' •

 Scrubber Economics

 The total cost of the scrubber installation was approximately $138,000
 with an estimated operating cost of approximately $30,000 per year.   A
 breakdown of these costs is provided in Table 29.  It should be pointed
 out, however, that many of the material costs are somewhat depressed as
 a result of cooperation among many of the equipment vendors in supplying
 equipment for a research-demonstration oriented project.

 SUMMARY OF SCRUBBER NEUTRALIZATION CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

 The results of the scrubber neutralization,  demonstration phase of this
 project lead to the following conclusions:

 1.    The practicability of utilizing coal-fired boiler flue gases to
      neutralize caustic wastewaters was proven.  Caustic wastewater re-
      sulting from Canton Textile Mills, Inc.'s dyeing operation were
      utilized in conjunction with a conventional wet scrubber to remove
      a portion of the carbon dioxide and sulfur dioxide fractions of the
      c'oal-fired boiler flue gas to successfully reduce the pH level of
      these wastewaters.
"•> '•-
 2.    Neutralization of the wastewaters by flue gas scrubbing was shown
      to improve the efficiency of the subsequent biological treatment
      system by producing a more favorable influent pH and alkalinity
      while producing relatively insignificant effects upon the other
      characteristics of the wastewater influent.

 3.    The scrubber installation demonstrated the ability to achieve in
      excess of 80% particulate removal from the exit gas stream of a
      mechanical dust collector reducing the particulate emissions to as
      low as 0.9 to 3.0 kilograms per hour.
                                   85

-------
                 Table  29.  CAPITAL AND OPERATING  COSTS
                           OF  SCRUBBER SYSTEM
                              CAPITAL COSTS

 Item Description                                                  $   Cost

   FMC/Link Belt Scrubber System  (with Fiberglass                     17,000
        separator and sump)
   I.D.  Fan and Motor                                                 8,500
   Pumps and Motors                                                   7,500
   Instrumentation ,                                                   15,000
   Ductwork                                                           16,200
   Electrical                                                         15,300
   Foundations and Concrete Work                                      10,700
   Erection                                                           9,600
   Piping                                                             20.200

        Total Capital Costs                                        $120,000
Engineering Construction Supervision, Start-up,
       and other Contingencies                                       18,000
       GRAND TOTAL                                                $138.000


                             OPERATING COSTS*

Item Description                                             Yearly  $ Cost

  Power                                                              18,500
  Operating Personnel                                                5,500
  Maintenance                                                        10,000

       Total      ,                                                $  34.000


a Does not include the cost of dredging fly ash from equalization basin
  or landfill disposal.
                                   86

-------
While it was demonstrated possible  to  achieve up  to  76% removal of
sulfur dioxide from the  flue  gas, it was  found  necessary  to optimize
the sulfur dioxide removal  to achieve  the desired neutralization
effect.  By utilizing a  sulfur dioxide removal  of approximately 29%,
it was possible to produce  a  neutralized  total  dyestream  having a pH
of approximately  7.2 units.

The ability of the scrubber system  to  acidify the entire  volume of
wastewater might  prove especially advantageous  should  the decision
be made to incorporate alum coagulation into the  treatment system.
Since the optimum pH for alum coagulation occurs  at  a  pH  of 5.5
units, the scrubber system  might be utilized to produce this pH
level and achieve significant savings  in  chemical costs.  Likewise,
should the decision be made to proceed with a lime coagulation addi-
tion, the scrubber system might be  utilized in  the final  wastewater
pH adjustment step.  The excess calcium from the  lime  coagulation
process might, however,  result in serious scaling problems.  In
either case, lime or alum coagulation; economics  might be signifi-
cantly improved by incorporation of scrubber neutralization. Further
investigation is  recommended  in this  area of application.
                              87

-------
                              SECTION VIII

                               REFERENCES
1.   Georgia Department of Natural Resources  (Meeting with Mr. W. Jd.
     Jerrigan).  Definition of Secondary "treatment.  R. S. Noonan, Inc.
     of South Carolina History No. 008, September  15, 1972.
     v '               .                     •                            '
2.   fenney, M. W. and T. G. Cole.  The Use of ' Fly Ash in Conditioning
     Biological Sludges for Vacuum Filtration.  Journal of ^Waiter Pol-
     lution Control Federation.  40(8) :R281-R302, August 1968.
     • :  :   , •••^-     /   •     .     —   -              °     .-.
3.   National Lime Association.  Ash  at Work.  1(2): 1-4, 1969.

4.   Minnick, L. J. Investigations Relating to the Use of Fly Ash as a
     Pozzolanic Material and as an Admixture in the Portland Cement
     Concrete.  Proceedings American  Society of Testing and -Materials .
     3411129-1158, 1958.
5.   Tenny, M. W. and W. F. Echelberger, Jr.  Fly Ash Utilizing in
     Abatement of Polluted Waters.  Bureau of Mines Information Circu-
     lar.  .8488:237-265, 1970.
                                                              -••••>,.
6.   Johnson, G. E., L. M. Kunka, A. J. Forney, and J. H. Field.  The
   *  Use of Coal and Modified Coals as Adsorbents for Removing Organic
     Contaminants from Wastewater.  Bureau of Mines, Report of Inven-
     tions.  6884. 1966.

7,   Lorenz, K.  Secondary Treatment of Power Plant Phenol Waste With
     Fly Ash and Cinders.  Gesundheitsingenieur.  _75: 189-194, 1954.

8.   Weber, W. J. , Jr.  Physicochemical Processes for Water Quality
     Control.  John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York.  1972.  p 199-259.

9.   Boehm, H. P.  Chemical Identification of Surface Groups.  Advances
     in Catalysis.  Eley, D. D., H. Pine, and P. B. Weisz (Editors),
     Academic Press, New York.  j.6_:179, 1966.

10.  Garten, V. A., D. E. Weiss, ad J. B. Willis.  A New Interpretation
     of the Acid and Base Structure of Carbons.  Austrailian Journal of
     Chemistry.  ^0:295, 1957.

11.  Snoeyink, V. L., and W. J. Beber, Jr.  The Surface Chemistry of
     Active Carbon:  A Discussion of Structure and Surface Functional
     Groups.  Environmental Science and Technology.  J[:228, 1967.
                                  89

-------
12.  Kelnath, T. M. and P. D. Holcombe.  Process Technology for the Treat-
     ment of Textile Finishing Wastewaters - IV, Treatment of Dyeing and
     Finishing Wastewaters.  Department of Environmental Systems Engineer-
     ing, Clemson University* Clemson, South Carolina.  1972.  p 4-9.

13.  Porter, J. C.» A. R. Abernathy, J. C. Ford, and D. W. Lyons.  State
     of the Art of Textile Wastewater Treatment.  Clemson University,
     Clemson, South Carolina.

14.  Lumb, C.  Pollution by Textile Effluents in the Mersey Basin.  The
     Cotton, Silk, and Man-Made Fibers Research Association, Shirley In-
     stitute, Manchester, England, Pamphlet Ho. 92.  1966.

IS.  United States Public Health Service.  An Industrial Waste Guide to
     the Cotton Textile Industry.  U. S. Government Printing Office,
     Washington, D. C.  Publication No. 667.  1959.

16.  Parsons, W. A.  Chemical Treatment of Sewage and Industrial Wastes.
     National Lime Association, Washington, D. C.  £15:1-32, 1965.

17.  Mysels, K. J.  Introduction to Chemistry.  Intersclence Publishers,
     Inc., New York.  1959.

18.  Stumn, W. and J. J. Morgan.  Chemical Aspects of Coagulation.
     Journal of American Water Works Association.  54:971, 1962.

19.  O'Mella, C. R.  A Review of the Coagulation Process.  Public Works
     Journal.  100;87. 1969.

20.  Kruyt, H. R. (Editor).  Colloidal Science, Volume I.  Elsevier
     Publishing Company, New York.  1952.

21.  Stumn, W, and C. R. O'Mella.  Stoichiometry of Coagulation.  Jour-
     nal of American Water Works Association.  60:514-539, 1962.

22.  EPA Process Design Manual for Suspended Solids Removal, EPA Tech-
     nology Transfer Program 17030 GNO, Contract No. 14*12-930.
     October, 1971.

23.  Roberts, J. M. and C. P. Roddy.  Recovery and Reuse of Alum Sludge.
     Journal of American Water Works Association.  58(7):857-865, 1960.

24.  Thompson, C. G., J. E. Singley, and A. P. Black.  Magnesium Carbo-
     nate:   A Recycled Coagulant - Part I.  Journal of American Water
     Works Association.  64(1):11-19, 1972.
                                  90

-------
25.  Thompson, C. G., J. E. Singley, and A. P. Black.  Magnesium Carbo-
     nate:  A Recycled Coagulant - Part II.  Journal of American Water
     Works Association.  64.(2) :93-99,  1972.

26.  Environmental Science and Technology.  Recyclable Coagulants Look
     Promising for Drinking Water Treatment.  Environmental Science
     and Technology.  74(4):304-305, 1973.

27.  South Lake Tahoe Public Utility District.  Advanced Wastewater
     Treatment as Practiced at South Lake Tahoe.  EPA Report 17010
     ELQ 80/71.  1971.

28.  Evans, D. R. and J. C. Wilson.  Capital and Operating Cost - AWT.
     Journal Water Pollution Control Federation.  44(1):1-13, 1972.

29.  Kram, D. J.  Selection and Use of the Rotary Lime Kiln and Its
     Auxiliaries.  Paper Trade Journal.  July, 1972.

30.  Beck, A. J., E. N. Sakellariou, and M. Krup.  A Method for Evalu-
     ating the Variables in Vacuum Filtration of Sludge.  Sewage and
     Industrial Wastes Association.  27(6):689-701, 1965.

31.  Vesilind, P. A.  Treatment and Disposal of Wastewater Sludges.
     Ann Arbor Science Publishers, Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan.  1974.
     p 109-112.

32.  Schepman, B. A. and C. F. Cornell.  Fundamental Operating Variables
     in Sewage Sludge Filtration.  (A  paper presented at 1955 Annual
     Meeting of Pacific Northwest Sewage and Industrial Wastes Associa-
     tion, Vicoria,  B. C.  October 27-29, 1955).

33.  Metcalf & Eddy, Inc.  Wastewater  Engineering:  Collection, Treat-
     ment, Disposal.  McGraw Hill, Inc., New York.  1972.  p 376-377.

34.  Kaplan, N.  An  Overview of Double Alkali Process for Flue Gas De-
     sulfurization,  Atlanta, Georgia.  EPA-650/2-74-126-b.  November,
     1974.  p 445-517.

35.  Lamantia, C. F., R. R. Lunt, J. E. Oberhaltzer, E. L. Field, and
     N. Kaplan.  EPA-ADL Dual Alkali Program - Interium Results.  Pro-
     ceedings:  Symposijm on Flue Gas  Desulfurization, Atlant, Georgia.
     EPA-650/2-74-126-b.  November, 1974.  p 549-564.

36.  Elliott, T. C.  S02 Removal From  Stack Gases.  Power.  118(9);51-524,
     1974.
                                   91

-------
37.  Georgia Department of Natural Resources.  Rules and Regulations for
     Air Quality Control.   Chapter 390-3-1.  September, 1973 (Rev.).
     p 203-242.

38*  Rossoff, J., R. C. Rossi, and L.  J. Barnstein.  Disposal of By-
     products from Non-Regenerable Flue Gas Desulfurization Systems.
     Proceedings:  Symposijm on Flue Gas Desulfurization, Atlanta,
     Georgia.  EPA-650/2-74-126-b.  November, 1974.  p 401-443.

39.  Weir, A., J. M. Johnson, D. G. Jones, and S. T. Carlisle.   The
     Horizontal Cross Flow Scurbber.  Proceedings:  Symposium of Flue
     Gas Desulfurization,  Atlanta, Georgia.  EPA-650/2-74-126-b.
     November, 1974.  p 357-400.
                                  92

-------
APPENDIX
   93

-------
                    Table Al.   DESIGN  DATA FOR EXISTING
                          WASTEWATER  FACILITIES
 A.   Mix Box,  Bar  Screen  & Parshall  Flume

      1.   No mechanical or baffle-type mixing  provided.
     2.   Bar  Screen is manually  cleaned.
     3.   Parshall Flume  (6") with continuous  read  out flow recorder.

 B.   Pre-Aeration  Tank

     1.   Modified Imhoff Tank with  provisions for  diffused air
     2.   Three  sections  having total volume of 42,400 gallons
          (30' x 7'  x 9')
     3.   Air  delivery regulated  manually with no flow measuring devices
          on air lines.

 C.   Lift Station

     1.   Provides for transfer of wastewater  from  pre-aeration tank
          to aeration tank.
     2.   Three  pumps - 175, 275, 400 gpm capacities

 D.   Biological  Aeration  Tank

     1.   Volume - 272,000 gallons (90' x 27'  x 15')
     2.   Air  diffusers 3-28* headers with  14  spargers per  header  for
          a total  of  42 spargers.
     3.   Two  (2)  blowers (485 cfm @ 6 psi  rated capacities)

 E.   Secondary Clarifier

     1.   Volume 39,600 gallons
     2.   Effluent Weir Length 54.3  feet
     3.   Sludge return to Aeration  Basin (Pump) -  165 gpm  capacity
     4.   No skimmer
     5.   Overflow Rate - 1820 gpd/ft2
NOTE;  Existing System Designed by R. H.  Souther,  1960.
                                  94

-------
                   Table A2.   DESIGN DATA FOR UPGRADED
                     WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITIES
A.   Equalization Pond Lift  Station      '•'•
     1.   Two pumps - 420  gpm @ 33 feet of  water (Head)
     2.   Mechanical alternator,  float controlled

B.   Equalization Pond
     1.   Nominal Capacity 1 million gallons
     2.   Dimensions - 300'  x 60'  (top) & 270'  x 35'  (bottom)

C.   Biological Aeration Basin
     1.   Reduced air spargers from 42 to 28  to improve mixing effect.
     2.   Blowers - changes  motor  sheaves to  achieve maximum rpm rating
          (680 cfm @ 6 psi & 910  cfm @ 6 psi).

D.   Lift Station (to No.  2  Clarifier)
     1.   Provides for transfer of wastewater exiting existing clarifier
          to new No. 2 Clarifier,
     2.   Two (2) pumps -  each 300 gpm @ 30 ft.  head  (water).
     3.   Mechanical alternator,  float controlled.

E.   No. 2 Clarifier
     1.   Volume - 74,800  gallons  (40* dia. x 8f  S.W.D.)
     2.   Skimmer provided
     3.   Design Overflow  Rate -  350 gpd/ft2.
     4.   Sludge return to Aeration Basin (via  gravity) - 0 to 300 gpm
          manually controlled.
     5.   Weir Length - 122  feet.

F.   Aerobic Digester
     1.   Volume 74,100 gallons (35'  dia. x 10'  S.W.D.)..
     2.   Aerator - 20 HP.  (30cfm).
     3.   Gravity Drain to Sludge  Lagoons.

G.   Sludge Lagoons (2)
     1.   Volume - 1 @ 142,620 gallons and  1  @  131,215 gallons.

H.   Chlorine Contact Basin
     T   Volume - 2872 gallons (Based on 15  minute retention time @ 190

     2.   Chlorine solution  feed  (C12 gas + H20)  - 100 Ibs. Cl2/day
          capacity.
     3.   90° V-notch weir with flow recorder and totalizer.
                                   95

-------
                              Table  A3.   PACKED COLUMN REACTOR TEST
                                     WITH  UNFILTERED EFFLUENT
A.     Test Conditions:
       Fly Ash Bed Depth:
       Fly Ash Weight:
       Mode of Contact:
          16.5 cm
          200 gm    ;
          Gravity, Downflow
Elapsed Time Flow Rate Color (AP11A Total Solids Susp. Solids
(Min.) (1/min/m2) Pt.Co. Units) (mg/l) ' (mg/1)
Prefiltered Effl.
0
10
20
30
_
55.00
48.08
43.19
39.93
4375
85
165
1350
2000
1845
3739
1713
1659
1732
123
137
1
2
2
B.     Test Conditions:
       Fly Ash Bed Depth:
       Fly Ash Weight:
       Mode of Contact:
Elapsed Time
    (Min.)
Flow Rate
25.4 cm
318 gm
Gravity, Downflow

       Color (APHA
      Pt.Co. Units)
Total Solids
   (me/I)
Susp. Solids
   (mg/1)
Raw Effluent
3
33
63
123
153
Total Volume of Ef flue

28.11.
15.28
13.73
13.73
13.73
it with color (1
3400
30
15
20
1400
1600
10 APHA Pt. Co. Unit
1939
4072
1769
1771
1763
1733 16
i = 3.59 liters
78
6
7
5
19
16

C.     Test Conditions:
       Fly Ash Bed Depth:
       Fly Ash Height;
       Mode of Contact:
Elapsed Time
   (Min.)
Flow Rate
42 cm
504 gm
Gravity, Downflow

       Color (APHA
      Pt.Co. Units)
Total Solids
   fag/1)
Susp. Solids
   (mg/1)
Raw Effluent
3
33
63
93
124
159
183
213
243
Total Volume of Ef flue

15.12
14.30
12.63
11.53
11.82
12.10
11.82
10.43
7.99
it with color (1
1550
10
10
25
30
50
40
75
200
370
10 APHA Pt. Co. Unit
1654
3647
1523
1464
1468
1477
1540
1483
1506
1518
i - 7.60 liters)
50
26
24
16
13
15
16
21
21
20

                                               96

-------
                  Table A4.   PACKED COLUMN REACTOR TEST WITH PREFILTERED EFFLUENT8
 A.      Test Conditions:
        Fly Ash Bed Depth:
        Fly Ash Weight:
        Mode of Contact:
          16.5 cm
          200 gm
          Gravity. Downflow
Elapsed Time Flow Rate Color (APHA Total Solids Susp. Solids
(Min.) (l/min/n/) Pt.Co. Units) (me/1) frne/n
Raw Effluent
Prefiltered Effl.
0
10
20 .v
30
67,63
63.56
50.52
48.48
4375
3050
15
860
2150
2700
1845
1699
3600
1665
1615
1753
123
120
247
17
24
30
B. Test Conditions:
Fly Ash Bed Depth: 25.4 cm
Fly Ash Weight: 318 gm
""' Mode of Contact: Gravity, Down flow
Elapsed Time Flow Rate Color (APHA Total Solids Susp. Solids
(Min.) (1/min/m2) Pt.Co. Units) (mg/1) (mg/1)
Raw Effluent
Prefiltered Effl.
0
30
60
90
120
150
180
210

-
25.95
17.11
10.67 "
10.67
10.67
9.78
7.62
6.11
3400
1895
30
20
35
50
50
60
110
310
1939
977
3974
1377
1173
1197
1240
1225
1406
1230
78
50
6
11
9
9
6
7
9
17
 C.     Test  Conditions:
       Fly Ash  Bed  Depth:
       Fly Ash  Weight:
       Mode  of  Contact:
          40 gm
          481 gm
          Gravity, Downflow
Elapsed Time
Flow Rate
                                                              Total Solids
                                                      Susp. Solids
yru.ii. j
Raw Effluent
3
15
29
50
76
142
157
172
Total Volume of Efflut
23.88
20.82
15.60
14.10
12.87
13.16
13.49
12.55
nt with color (1
8125
10
20
20
20
20
40
100
200
310
00 APHA Pt. Co. Uni
1488
3544
1665
1404
. 1380
1385
1361
1366
1355
1366
ts - 5.6 liters
46
19
9
19
15
11
11
11
7
9

a Effluent was "filtered  through  710 micron  screen
                                                97

-------
                  Table A5.  TYPICAL JAR TEST PROCEDURE
Test Apparatus:    Phipps and Bird (Six Unit) Multiple Stirrer

Procedure

1.   1.0 liter of wastewater was measured into each jar.

2.   Approximately 150 ml. of the 1.0 liter total was placed in a
     separate 250 beaker.

3.   Dry chemicals to be added were weighed on an analytical balance.

4.   Dry chemicals were slurried with portions from the 150 ml. volume.

5.   Rapid mixing of the wastewater was begun.

6.   Chemical slurries were added to the jar; slurry beakers were rinsed
     thoroughly with the wastewater that remained in the 250 ml. beaker.
     (Total wastewater volume in each jar was 1.0 liter).

7.   Wastewater was rapid mixed at 100 rpm for 2 minutes.

8.   Wastewater was flocculated at 20-24 rpm for 15 minutes.

9.   Floes were allowed to settle for 30 minutes.

10.  After settling, supernatant was siphoned off for analyses.

11.  The low dosage of coagulant that yielded good results in terms of
     the subject parameter (color) was selected and a second jar series
     was run with the optimum dosage in all beakers.  The pH level of
     the coagulation was then varied by employing various dosages of
     acid (H2S04) or alkali (NaOH).  Similar procedure was again utilized
     through the mixing, flocculation, settling steps above and the   .
     optimum pH range for the desired effect was selected.
                                  98

-------
                Table A6.  BUCHNER FUNNEL TEST PROCEDURE
1.   Thirty liters of wastewater were coagulated using the predetermined
     optimum coagulant dosage.  After a period of settling, the sludge
     was carefully withdrawn.  This procedure was repeated until a min-
     imum of four liters of sludge was collected.

2.   The combined sludge sample was then analyzed for percent solids.

3.   The Buchner funnel apparatus was arranged as illustrated in
     Figure 12 with two No. 4 Whatman Filters placed in the 9-cm funnel.

4.   The filter paper was moistened, vacuum applied, and the water drawn
     through the filter discarded.

5.   Exactly 200 milliliters of the sludge was then poured over the pre-
     pared funnel and the vacuum applied.

6.   Various vacuums were then applied for selected time periods.

7.   At the end of the selected filtration time or upon loss of vacuum,
     the filtrate and filter cake were analyzed.
                                  99

-------
             Table A7.  RESULTS OF BUCHNER FUNNEL TESTS WITH
                 SLUDGE GENERATED FROM ALUM COAGULATION
Test No. 1;  2.0 Minute Filtration
             Initial Sludge - 200 ml @ 0.40% Solids
Vacuum Filtrate
Vacuum Sludge Cake Break
(in. of Hg) (% Solids) (min. )
10
15
20
Poor Cake
Poor Cake
Poor Cake
ma
-
**
Volume
(ml.)
102
108
120
COD
(mg/1)
1]f
-
«.
Color r (APHA
Pt.Co. Units)
-u-
-
™"
PH
(Units)
_
-
*
Test No. 2;  4.0 Minute Filtration
             Initial Sludge - 200 ml @ 0.40% Solids
Vacuum Filtrate
Vacuum Sludge Cake Break
(in. of Hg) (% Solids) (min.)
10
15
20
Poor Cake
Poor Cake
Poor Cake
^
-
~
Volume
(ml.)
152
156
158
COD
(mg/1)
<0>
- .
a.
Color (APHA
Pt.Co. Units)
«*'
.••* <
•»
PH
(Units)
^
: -
*™
Test No. 3;  6.0 Minute Filtration
             Initial Sludge - 200 ml @ 0.29% Solids
Vacuum Filtrate
Vacuum Sludge Cake Break
(in. of Hg) {% Solids) (min.)
10
15
20

Poor Cake
Poor Cake
Poor Cake

1 1
—
. -

Volume
(ml.)
176
184
188

COD
(ffig/1)
mm
-
• -
' '.
Color (APHA
Pt.Ca. Units)
1 «• t • '
( — -d
•*•• ;' ; . '. '
• • • J 1 - ' . *'
PH
(Units)
•V
-
-

Test No. 4:
8.0 Minute Filtration
Initial Sludge - 200 ml @ 0.29% Solids
Vacuum Filtrate
Vacuum Sludge Cake Break
(in. of Hg) (% Solids) (min.)
10
15
20
55.7
60.0
67.5
7.25
6.75
6.50
Volume
(ml.)
188
190
195
COD
(mg/1)
24
28
20
Color (APHA
Pt.Co. Units)
60
70
80
PH
(Units)
4.4
4.3
4.5
                                   100

-------
             Table A8.  RESULTS OF BUGHNER FUNNEL TESTS WITH
                 SLUDGE GENERATED WITH LIME COAGULATION
Test No. 1;  2.0 Minute Filtration
             Initial Sludge - 200 ml @ 2.97% Solids
Vacuum Filtrate
Vacuum Sludge Cake Break

-------
    Table A9.  RESULTS OF BUCHNER FUNNEL TESTS WITH SLUDGE GENERATED
              WITH MAGNESIUM CARBONATE AND LIME COAGULATION
Test No.  1:
2.0 Minute Filtration
Initial Sludge - 200 ml @ 3.01% Solids
Vacuum Filtrate
Vacuum Sludge Cake Break
(in. of Hg) (% Solids) (min.)
10
15
20
Poor Cake
Poor Cake
Poor Cake
_
-
"•
Volume
(ml.)
80
82
86
COD
(mg/1)
^
-
™
Color (APHA
Pt.Co. Units)
•«•
-
mm
PH
(Units)
_
_
~
Test No. 2:
4.0 Minute Filtration
Initial Sludge - 200 ml @ 3.01% Solids
Vacuum
Vacuum Sludge Cake Break
(in. of Hg) (% Solids) (min.)
10
15
20
Poor Cake
Poor Cake
Poor Cake
-
—
Filtrate
Volume
(ml.)
114
118
122
COD
(mg/1)
-
~
Color (APHA
Pt.Co. Units)
-
•*•
pH
(Units)
<
—
Test No. 3:
6.0 Minute Filtration
Initial Sludge - 200 ml @ 2.03% Solids
Vacuum Filtrate
Vacuum Sludge Cake Break
(in. of Hg) (% Solids) (min.)
10
15
20
Poor Cake
16.4
19.8
_
-
—
Volume
(ml.)
180
182
184
COD
(mg/1)
_
46
50
Color (APHA
Pt.Co. Units)
^
10
30
PH
(Units)
_
11.5
11.5
Test No. 4:
8.0 Minute Filtration
Initial Sludge - 200 ml <§ 3.57% Solids
Vacuum Filtrate
Vacuum Sludge Cake Break
(in. of Hg) (% Solids) (min.)
10
15
20
26.4
28.8
29.9
7.25
6.75
6.00
Volume
(ml.)
178
180
182
COD
(mg/1)
39
31
23
Color (APHA
Pt.Co. Units)
10
10
10
PH
(Units)
11.5
11.5
11.5
                                    102

-------
    Table A10.  RESULTS OF BUCHNER FUNNEL TESTS WITH SLUDGE GENERATED
                     FROM LIME-DOW A-23 COAGULATION
Test No. 1:
2.0 Minute Filtration
Initial Sludge - 200 ml @ 3.84% Solids
Vacuum
Vacuum Sludge Cake Break
(in. of Hg) (% Solids) (min.)
10
15
20
11.1
14.9
15.7
•V
-
~
Filtrate
Volume
(ml.)
126
130
144
COD
(mg/1)
71
60
40
Color (APHA
Pt.Co. Units)
20
15
15
PH
(Units)
11.2
11.2
11.2
Test No. 2:
4.0 Minute Filtration
Initial Sludge - 200 ml @ 4.33% Solids
Vacuum Filtrate
Vacuum Sludge Cake Break
(in. of Hg) (% Solids) (min.)
10
15
20
24.8
29.3
28.1

3.83
3.75
Volume
(ml.)
164
180
180
COD
(mg/1)
44
36
32
Color (APHA)
Pt.Co. Units)
30
20
20
pH
(Units)
11.3
11.4
11.4
Test No. 3:
6.0 Minute Filtration
Initial Sludge - 200 ml @ 6.48% Solids
Vacuum Filtrate
Vacuum Sludge Cake Break
(in. of Hg
10
15
20
(% Solids) (min.)
24.8
29.3
28.1
4.00
3.75
3.50
Volume
(ml.)
148
160
170
COD
(mg/1)
63
31
67
Color (APHA
Pt.Co. Units)
30
20
20
PH
(Units)
11.4
11.5
11.4
Test No. 4:
8.0 Minute Filtration
Initial Sludge - 200 ml <§ 5.83% Solids
Vannim Filtrate
Vacuum Sludge Cake Break
(in. of Hg'i (Z Solids') (min.)
10
15
20
•••••••^••^^•••••^••••••^^•••••A
28,2
28.0
28.4
_.._! ' 	
5.30
4.75
4.25
___••.••—• — — —
Volume
(ml.)
156
158
164
	
COD
(mg/1)
56
62
59
.•••. • n ••
Color (APHA
Pt.Co. Units)
15
20
20
_— — — i— ^— — — — —

PH
(Units)
11.4
Uj
.4
nt
.4
^^•••BHH^^H^BI-^HI^^^
                                     103

-------
                    Table All.  TYPICAL COAL ANALYSIS
Size

Moisture

Ash (%)

Volatile (%)

Fixed Carbon

Sulfur (%)

Fusion Temperature of Ash  (AST)

Grindability (Hardgrove)

Free Swelling Index (A.S.T.M.)
     Coke Button

Heat Valve (as received)
                              ;
Heat Valve (dry)
3.2cm x 1.0cm (1-1/4 x 3/8 inch)

2.76

5.98

40.39

50.87

0.80

1454°C (2650°F)

60
7562 Kg.-Cal/Kg. (13,600 BTU/lb)

7840 Kg.-Cal/Kg. (14,100 BTU/lb)
                                    104

-------
  EPA- 600/2 -76-139
 4'T1TLEANOSUBT1TLE Treatment of
 Wastewaters : Neutralization and Color Removal
                                 TECHNICAL REPORT DATA
              3. RECIPIENT'S ACCESSION NO.

              5. REPORT DATE
              May 1976
                                                       6. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE
          Charles R.  Froneberger and
          MichaelJ. Pollock
              8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NO.
 R.S. Noonan, Inc. of South Carolina
 P.O. Box 1388
 Greenville, South Carolina 29602
              1O. PROGRAM ELEMENT NO.
              1BB036; ROAP 21AZT-006
               1. CONTRACT/GRANT NO.

              Grant S800852*
 12. SPONSORING AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS
  EPA, Office of Research and Development
  Industrial Environmental Research Laboratory
  Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
              13. TYPE OF REPORT AND PERIOD COVERED
              Final; 4/72-7/75
              14. SPONSORING AGENCY CODE
               EPA-ORD
 15. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES (*) Grantee is Canton Textile Mills, Inc.  Project officer for this
 report is T.N.Sargent, EPA, Cincinnati, Ohio 45268.
 16. ABSTRACT
               repOr|; des cribes a bench scale investigation using fly ash adsorption
 and chemical destabilization techniques to remove color from indigo and sulfur dyeing
 wastewaters from a denim textile mill. The investigation included a feasibility study
 and subsequent full scale demonstration flue gas wet scrubbing techniques for neutra-
 lizing caustic wastewaters.  The fly ash adsorption studies demonstrated that fly ash
 from a coal-fired boiler can adsorb and subsequently remove color, BOD5, and COD
 from biologically treated domestic and dyeing process wastewaters. The limited
 adsorbtion capacity of the fly ash and problems related to fly ash/wastewater contact
 made full scale application impractical.  The chemical destabilization studies inclu-
 ded investigation of 11 destabilizing agent combinations , chemical recycle ,  and var-
 ious parameters associated with sludge handling and disposal. The studies  concluded
 that calcium hydroxide or aluminum sulfate could successfully remove color and
 produce a supernatant of suitable quality to recycle. The practicability of using coal-
 fired boiler flue gases to neutralize caustic wastewaters was demonstrated on full
 scale.  Caustic wastewaters were used with a conventional wet scrubber to success-
 fully neutralize the wastewaters by SO2 and CO2 absorption from the flue gas while
 simultaneously reducing the particulate emissions.
 7.
                              KEY WORDS AND DOCUMENT ANALYSIS
                 DESCRIPTORS
                                           b.lDENTIFIERS/OPEN ENDED TERMS
                          c. COSATI Field/Gioup
 Pollution, Textile Processes,  Textiles,
 Waste Water, Neutralizing, Decoloring,
 Fly Ash, Adsorption, Sulfur,  Flue Gases,
 Scrubbers, Sludge, Calcium Hydroxides,
 Aluminum Sulfate, Sulfur Dioxide,
  arbon Dioxide
  Pollution Control
  Stationary Sources
  Denim
  Chemical Destabilization
13B, 13H, HE
   07A/07D
21B,07B
 8. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT

 Unlimited
  19. SECURITY CLASS (ThisReport)
  Unclassified   	.
•1. NO. OF PAGES
   114
  20. SECURITY CLASS (Thispage)
  Unclassified
                          22. PRICE
EPA Form 2220-1 (9-73)
105

-------