EPA-600/2-76-173
June 1976
Environmental Protection Technology Series
FINE PARTICLE EMISSIONS
INFORMATION SYSTEM REFERENCE MANUAL
Industrial Environmental Research Laboratory
Office of Research and Development
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711
-------
RESEARCH REPORTING SERIES
Research reports of the Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, have been grouped into five series. These five broad
categories were established to facilitate further development and application of
environmental technology. Elimination of traditional grouping was consciously
planned to foster technology transfer and a maximum interface in related fields.
The five series are:
1. Environmental Health Effects Research
2. Environmental Protection Technology
3. Ecological Research
4. Environmental Monitoring
5. Socioeconomic Environmental Studies
This report has been assigned to the ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
TECHNOLOGY series. This series describes research performed to develop and
demonstrate instrumentation, equipment, and methodology to repair or prevent
environmental degradation from point and non-point sources of pollution. This
work provides the new or improved technology required for the control and
treatment of pollution sources to meet environmental quality standards.
EPA RE VIEW NOTICE
This report has been reviewed by the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, and approved for publication. Approval
does not signify that the contents necessarily reflect the
views and policy of the Agency, nor does mention of trade
names or commercial products constitute endorsement or
recommendation for use.
This document is available to the public through the National Technical Informa-
tion Service, Springfield, Virginia 22161.
-------
EPA-600/2-76-173
June 1976
FINE PARTICLE
EMISSIONS INFORMATION SYSTEM
REFERENCE MANUAL
by
M. P. Schrag, A.K. Rao, G.S. McMahon,
and G.L. Johnson (EPA)
Midwest Research Institute
425 Volker Boulevard
Kansas City, Missouri 64110
Contract No. 68-02-1324, Task 47
ROAPNo. 21BJV-023
Program Element No. 1AB012
EPA Task Officer: Gary L. Johnson
Industrial Environmental Research Laboratory
Office of Energy, Minerals, and Industry
Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Prepared for
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Office of Research and Development
Washington, DC 20460
-------
PREFACE
This document was prepared for EPA/IERL-RTP under Contract No. 68-02-1324,
Task 47. The task officer was Mr. Gary L. Johnson.
The work was performed in the Environmental and Materials Sciences Division
of Midwest Research Institute. Dr. L. J. Shannon served as project manager
and Mr. M. P. Schrag, Head, Environmental Systems Section was the project
leader.
The document was written by Mr. Schrag and Dr. A. K. Rao with assistance
from Mr. G. S. McMahon of MRI Systems, Inc., and the task officer.
Approved for:
MIDWEST RESEARCH INSITUTE
L. J. (Shannon, Director
Environmental and Materials
Sciences Division
December 21, 1976
11
-------
CONTENTS
List of Tables,
IV
List of Figures v
Section 1 Introduction RM-1.0-1
Section 2 FPEIS Data Base Description RM-2.0-0
Section 3 FPEIS Data Definitions and Protocol RM-3.0-0
Section 4 User Request Command Abstracts RM-4.0-0
Section 5 Appendix
5.1 Sample FPEIS Data Input Forms RM-5.1-1
5.2 Example of FPEIS Standard Report
Output RM-5.2-1
5.3 Test Series Numbers and References
in the FPEIS RM-5.3-1
111
-------
LIST OF TABLES
Number Title Page
2.2-1 FPEIS Data Elements and Their Levels RM-2.2-2
3.2-1 Data Elements Requiring Standard Nomenclature ..... RM-3.2-2
IV
-------
LIST OF FIGURES
Number Title Page
2.1-1 FPEIS Structure RM-2.1-5
-------
RM-1.0-1
1.0 Introduction
The Fine Particle Emissions Information System (FPEIS) is a computerized
information system containing data on primary fine particle emissions to
the atmosphere from stationary point sources and includes data on control
device performance. The purpose of the system is to provide a centralized
source of fine particle measurement information for use by engineers and
scientists engaged in fine particle control technology development.
The contents of the FPEIS may include source test data with particle size
distributions; chemical, physical, and bioassay testing results from anal-
yses of particulate samples; and design and performance data on any parti-
cle control systems applied. Also included are process descriptions of the
sources, and descriptions of the sampling equipment and techniques employed.
These data and information items are classified and arranged so as to en-
sure some compatibility with other EPA data bases, i.e., NEDS (the Source
Classification Codes)- and the SARDAD/SOTDAT chemical identification sys-
tems.-/
A uniform protocol for units and terminology has been developed along with
standard input forms and definition of each data element for the system.
These standards and definitions will allow all data in the system to be
stored or retrieved on a common basis.
J./ "Guide for Compiling a Comprehensive Emission Inventory," EPA No. APTD-
~ 1135, NTIS No. PB212-231, March 1973.
21 "SOTDAT Final Report," EPA No. 450/3-75-070, July 1975.
-------
KM-1.0-2
The FPEIS has been implemented at the EPA National Computer Center (NCC)
at Research Triangle Park, on the UNIVAC 1110 computer using SYSTEM 2000,
a flexible data base management system. SYSTEM 2000, developed by MRI Sys-
tems, Inc., of Austin, Texas (no relation to Midwest Research Institute),
will provide users with a virtually unlimited potential for data analysis.
Features of SYSTEM 2000 include sorting, comparing, and retrieving informa-
tion from the FPEIS in a variety of arrangements.
This document constitutes a basic Reference Manual for the FPEIS. This re-
port presents a detailed description of the FPEIS data base with definition
of all data types and elements included, a list of available information
request procedures, sample data input forms, output format capabilities,
and an index to the references and literature sources used to compile the
FPEIS data base, in order of unique test series number. A companion docu-
ment, the FPEIS User Guide (EPA-600/2-76-172), contains detailed instruc-
tions for submitting new data to the FPEIS as well as specific procedures
to be used for retrieving information from the data base.
These manuals are designed with discrete segments for major sections and
subsections. As changes, additions, and expansions of the system and the
informational capabilities are made, the manuals will be updated as appro-
priate.
-------
RM-2.0-0
SECTION 2
FPEIS DATA BASE DESCRIPTION
CONTENTS
Number Item Page
2.0 List of Tables RM-2.0-1
List of Figures RM-2.0-2
Introduction. RM-2.0-3
2.1 FPEIS Structure RM-2.1-1
2.2 FPEIS Organization RM-2.2-1
2.2.1 Source and Test Series Related Information. . . . RM-2.2.1-1
2.2.2 Control Device Characteristics and Design
Parameters RM-2.2.2-1
2.2.3 Test Characteristics and Control Device
Operating Parameters RM-2.2.3-1
2.2.4 Biological and Chemical Analyses RM-2.2.4-1
2.2.5 Particle Size Equipment and Data RM-2.2.5-1
2.3 Derivation of Particle Size Distribution Equations. . RM-2.3-1
-------
RM-2.0-1
SECTION 2
LIST OF TABLES
Number Title
Page
2.2-1 FPEIS Data Elements and Their Levels RM-2.2-2
-------
RM-2.0-2
SECTION 2
LIST OF FIGURES
Number Title Page
2.1-1 FPEIS Structure KM-2.1-5
-------
EM-2.0-3
2.0 Introduction
The FPEIS contains industrial source emission test data and novel, pilot
or prototype control device evaluation data. It attempts to describe com-
pletely the aerosol from the point of its generation to the point at which
it leaves the control device. General categories of information include
source characteristics, control system descriptions, test characteristics,
particulate mass train results, physical, biological, and chemical proper-
of the particulates, particulate size measurement equipment/method, and
particulate size distribution data. Each category of information includes
a number of related data elements, each of which is a unique variable es-
sential for the description of the source tested.
The discussion in this section is to introduce a potential FPEIS user to
the data base. This section includes a narrative description of the struc-
ture, organization, and format of the FPEIS. Specific definition of each
data element is contained in Section 3 while encoding instructions are given
in Section 2 of the User Guide.!/
_!/ Fine Particle Emissions Information System User Guide, EPA-600/2-76-
172, June 1976.
-------
RMT2.1-1
2.1 FPEIS Structure
The structure of the FPEIS data base includes data elements sufficient to
provide information and data for source tests where fine particle measure-
ments were made. A data element is defined as a computer variable corre-
sponding to a particular source test data item. The completeness of infor-
mation for any given source test within the data base is limited only by
the availability of such information as contained in the test report or
original reference from which the FPEIS input was derived.
The organization of the FPEIS is shown in Figure 2.1-1. The input data to
the FPEIS have generally been derived from source test reports, published
papers, or FPEIS Data Input Forms as standard practice. Each report or
paper may have test data on one or more source/control device combinations.
(An uncontrolled source is defined as a combination of source and no con-
trol devices.) All the data pertaining to a source/control device combina-
tion obtained at a certain time are given a unique test series number. For
example, all data obtained on the Union Electric Meramec plant, Boiler
Unit 1, as a part of "Refuse Firing Demonstration Study" were given five
test series numbers. They are Test Series Nos. 19, 28, 29, 30, and 31, which
were tests conducted during December 1973, November 1974, March 1975, May
1975, and November 1975, respectively. During each test, coal only and/or
coal-plus-refuse was burned and the boiler was operated at various power
loads. The test series numbers have been assigned a master file number.
-------
RM-2.1-2
Each test series consists of a number of subsets or subseries, which rep-
resent all the data pertaining to a given combination of source and control
device operating parameters. The subseries ties different test runs together
and gives a complete description of the aerosol for the various operating
conditions of the source and control device.
The test run, which is the fundamental unit of the FPEIS system, is defined
as "any test measurement of a specific source/control device combination
for a specific length of time, with specific particle size measuring
equipment/method." For example, one size distribution measurement using
the diffusion battery/condensation nuclei counter constitutes a run. Another
size distribution measurement using an optical particle counter made at about
the same time, with the source and control device operating parameters un-
changed, constitutes another run. The mass train results such as those using
EPA Method 5 are not treated as a test run but are included at the subseries
level.
The test run as defined above has both advantages and disadvantages. The
disadvantages stem from the fact that the test run data being obtained by
a single particle size measuring equipment/method may not cover the entire
size spectrum of the aerosol. Therefore, it may be necessary to group sev-
eral test runs representing data from different instruments to obtain a
complete size distribution. On the other hand, this approach has flexibility,
in that the data obtained by each instrument can be assessed. For example,
if one makes six optical particle counter runs within the time of one impactor
-------
RM-2.1-3
run, one can average all the optical particle counter runs and compare the
average with the impactor run, or treat the six runs of the optical particle
counter separately, getting a time resolution for the optical data.
An advantage of the test run, as defined, is that it simplifies data coding
and verification. Furthermore, editing the data obtained by different in-
struments is also simplified. As an example, the cut points of an impactor
which are found to be off by a factor or two can, at a later date, be
changed very easily.
Groups of test runs are contained within a test subseries. A test subseries
is defined as a group of test runs, utilizing the same or different parti-
cle size measurement techniques at a specified location and under the same
or common source/collector operating characteristics. Significant changes
in source or collector operation as part of the test protocol define a new
subseries. As samples of different subseries, a planned change in the air
to cloth ratio for a fabric filter under test; a change in source feed mate-
rial; or charging cycle, melting cycle, lancing, and pouring for an arc
furnace would each define a different subseries. Similarly, a change in
measurement location, i.e., inlet or outlet of a collector also defines a
new subseries. Associated with each test subseries are the relevant data
for source operating characteristics, control device operating parameters,
test characteristics, sampling conditions and any other information and
data which describe the situation existing during the period of the test
subseries. Supplemental information may be included where available, such
-------
RM-2.1-4
as subsequent chemical analysis or biological testing of the collected
particulate on a total mass basis or as a function of particle size. Addi-
tionally, provisions are also made for narrative comments which can be used
to provide supplementary information, not elsewhere classified. Test sub-
series are numbered on a sequential, arbitrary basis by the encoder when
the data are compiled for entry into the system. This arrangement allows
grouping of simultaneous test runs into a common data set.
Subseries data sets for a source/collector test program are contained
within a test series. Again, a test series is defined as all the test runs
and subseries for an identifiable testing program. Measurements of the same
source/collector combination at two or more calendar dates separated in
time will result in different test series just as measurements at other
sources within a site or plant or at separate plants will also define a
different test series. A test series, then, will usually consist of the
information contained in a test report, technical journal, etc., specific
to a given source/collector combination. A table of test series and refer-
ences presently contained in the FPEIS data base is given in Section 5.3.
-------
FPEIS
Test Series
Level
Test Series 1
Test Series 2
Subseries
Level
Subseries 1
Subseries 2
Subseries 3
Subseries 1
Subseries 2
Run
Level
i
NJ
Figure 2.1-1. FPEIS Structure.
i
Ol
-------
RM-2.2-1
2.2 FPEIS Organization
FPEIS data are grouped into five general categories of information. These
include: (a) source and test series related information; (b) control de-
vice characteristics and design parameters; (c) test characteristics and
control device operating parameters; (d) particle size measurement equip-
ment and data; and (e) biological and chemical analyses data.
Each of these categories is described in the following subsections. The
relationship between these general categories of information and the data
base structure discussed in the previous section is shown in Table 2.2-1.
-------
RM-2.2-2
TABLE 2,2-1. FPEIS DATA ELEMENTS AND THEIR LEVELS
Test Series Level
A* Source Characteristics
Source category (SCC I)
Type of operation (SCC II).
Feed material class (SCC III)
Operating mode class (SCC IV)
Site and source name
Source address (street, city,
state, zip code)
UTM zone Location and coordinates
Test series start and finish date
Tested by and reference
Be Test Series Remarks
Subseries Level
C. Control Device(s) Characteristics
Generic device type
Device class and category
Device commercial name
Manufacturer
Description
Design parameter type and value
D. Test Characteristics
Test date, start, and finish
time
Source operating mode
Source operating rate
Percent design capacity
Feed material and its composition
Sampling location and its descrip-
tion
Volume flow rate, velocity tempera-
ture and pressure
Percent isokinet ic samp 1 ing
Orsat gas analysis and trace gas
Compo sit ion
Control Device(s) Operating Parameter
and Value Remarks
E. Particulate Mass Train Results
Front half and total mass concen-
tration
Mass train comments
F. Particulate Physical Properties
Density
Resistivity
Others
G. Bioassay Data
Bioassay test type
Te st comment s
H. Chemical Compo3J.ti.pn
Particle boundary diameters
Sizing instrument calibrated
or calculated
SAROAD chemical and analysis
method ID
Concentration in filter/total
Concentration in Ranges 1 through 9
I.
particulars
Measurement instrument/method name
Size range lower and upper boundary
Collection surface
Dilution factor
Measurement start time and period
Sample flow rate
Sample temperature, pressure, and
moisture content
Comment s
Particulate Size Distribution
Particle diameter basis
(Aerodynamic or Stokes)
Boundary diameter
Concentration basis (mass or number)
Concentration
-------
BM-2.2.1-1
2.2.1 Source and Test Series Related Information
This group of data elements identifies the stationary source that was tested,
the source location, and literature reference of information for the test
series. To enable a general grouping of sources to be made, each source test
series has been described in terms of the NEDS Source Classification Codes
that are applicable. The use of the NEDS codes is by specification of the
word description, not the associated numeric code. The source location is
described by address as well as by Universal Transverse Mercator zone and
X-Y coordinates as defined by the U.S. Geological Survey maps with scales
less than 1:62,500.!/
The name of the testing organization and the reference (report, journal
article, etc.) from which the data have been extracted are included. Addi-
tionally, remarks or data may be included which may be pertinent to the
test series, but for which a specific data type is not available.
\l "Guide for Compiling a Comprehensive Emission Inventory," EPA No. APTD-
1135, NTIS No. PB 212-231, March 1974.
2^1 "Universal Transverse Mercator Grid," U.S. Department of the Army,
Washington, D.C., Publication No. TM5-241-8, July 1958.
-------
RM-2.2.2-1
2.2.2 Control Device Characteristics and Design Parameters
Definition and description of the control system tested (if any) for the
test series as well as pertinent design parameters are contained in this
grouping of data elements. These data elements are described with the use
of standard nomenclature (see Section 3.1 and 3.2) to characterize the de-
vice by category, class, generic type, commercial name and manufacturer.
Additional device descriptive material is provided that may be necessary
for novel or hybrid control systems. The device descriptive elements are
arranged such that maximum flexibility exists for cases where multiple de-
vices are involved. Up to three control devices in series on a given source
may be reported.
Control device design parameters are indicated by type and value, where
known. A tabulation of suggested minimum specification types are provided
as standard nomenclature (see Section 2.1.6 of the User Guide) for the
four most common generic device types: Electrostatic Precipitator, Cyclone,
Wet Scrubber, and Fabric Filter. The units to be used are also given.
-------
KM-2.2.3-1
2.2.3 Test Characteristics and Control Device(s) Operating Parameters
Data contained in this group of data elements identify and define the test
subseries date and time, sampling location description and specific source
operating parameters. Such items as source operating rates, mode, feed mate-
rial, and composition, and stack gas conditions are also included. Ancillary
test results such as mass train, Orsat analysis and physical measurement
of the particulate (density, resistivity, etc.) and trace gas analysis can
be reported. Additional remarks or data pertinent to the test subseries or
test run which may be of use to the FPEIS users are also given.
Control device(s) operating parameters are indicated by type and value,
and are described by standard nomenclature with units to be used also given.
(See Section 3.1.) As in the case of design parameters (see Section 2.2.2),
suggested operating parameters are given for the four most common generic
device types: Electrostatic Precipitator, Cyclone, Wet Scrubber, and Fab-
ric Filter. The user may define and include additional parameters as required.
-------
KM-2.2.4-1
2,2.4 Biological and Chemical Analysis Data
Bioassay and chemical analyses which were performed on collected partic-
ulate are included in this data group. Bioassay tests performed are iden-
tified by using standard nomenclature (see Section 3.1.7). Comments or re-
sults of these tests can be entered in the space provided.
The chemical analysis group utilizes the pollutant chemical coding system
for the SAROAD/SOTDAT' data base system as well as a codification of anal-
ysis methods from the same system (see Section 2.1.6 of the User Guide).
The data are reported in units of concentration as a function of particle
size, where available, with the boundary intervals specified for the par-
ticle size measurement technique used, and whether on a calibrated or cal-
culated basis. The data are also reported on a total mass concentration
basis. Both elements and compounds may be identified and recorded.
A maximum of nine size ranges are available in addition to the category of
mass train filter or pooled stages. The mass train filter chemical composi-
tions are results of analyses performed on the particulate collected by
the mass sampling train. The pooled stages chemical compositions are for
analyses done by pooling collected particulate from several impactor stages
when there was insufficient particulate on individual stages for proper
analysis.
I/ "SOTDAT Final Report," EPA No. 450/3-75-070, July 1975,
-------
RM-2.2.5-1
2.2.5 Particle Size Measurement Equipment and Data
This grouping of data elements provides identification of the measurement
instrument or method, specific run data and sampling conditions. Measurement
instruments are defined in standard nomenclature (see Section 3.1.6, this
document) by generic class and type. Space is also provided for an indica-
tion of the general size range covered by the equipment and, for impactors,
a description of the collection substrate and its specifications. Comments
on the measurement are in text form where details of equipment calibration
methods or protocol can also be included.
Particle size distribution data are entered as mass fractions or number
fractions. The class boundary diameters are given along with whether the
diameters are obtained from calibration or from calculations. Designation
of aerodynamic or Stokes diameters are also provided. The data are given in
terms of mass concentrations per size interval, i.e., micrograms/dry normal
cubic meter or number concentrations per size interval, i.e., number/cubic
centimeter. By assuming the particles to be spherical and by using a given
gas dilution factor and particle density, output may be obtained which in-
cludes calculation of surface, mass, and number size distributions.
-------
RM-2.3-1
2.3 Derivation of Particle Size Distribution Equations
Aerosols can be characterized in a number of different ways. The choice
depends upon the particular need for characterization. For example, in the
field of air pollution one is mainly interested in the concentration and
size distribution based on aerosol mass. An FPEIS output option provides
concentration and size distributions based on particle mass, surface, or
number. Moreover, these distributions are provided on both a differential
and a cumulative basis.
Although there are a variety of data reduction techniques in the litera-
ture, a simple, general and straightforward procedure has been adopted.
Each run consists of several classes or stages. The raw data generally are
mass or number concentrations in each class and the upper and lower aero-
dynamic or Stokes boundary diameters. For example, in the case of impactors,
the mass collected on each stage per unit volume of gas sampled and the ef-
fective cut-off diameter of each stage are available. The upper boundary
for the first stage and lower boundary for the final filter can usually be
estimated.
The following equations are used in the data reduction.
1/2
Diameter midpoints = (upper boundary x lower boundary) (1)
p CD
Aerodynamic diameter, Dae = Dn -ฃ. E (2)
-------
RM-2.3-2
where Dp = particle diameter (Stokes or sedimentation diameter)
p = particle density
Cp = Cunningham slip correction factor [Note that the subscript
p,ae
refers to both Stokes (p) and aerodynamic (ae) diameters]
= 1 + 77 - [1.246 + 0.42 exp(-0.87 D ae/2\]
up,ae v*
\ = mean free path of gas molecules
CD = 1 + 0.162/Dp ae for air at NTP (Dp>ae is in |im, reference
temperature and pressure are 20ฐ C, 760 mm Hg)
Since Dae appears on both sides of Eq. (2), an interative technique is
needed to solve this equation.
The equations and definitions used to describe the mass, number and surface
concentrations are as follows:
Doi = Particle diameter midpoint (M-m)
o
AMjL = mass in ^g/m within the class
= number of particles per cubic centimeter within the class
(no. /cm3)
AS^ = surface area of particles within the class (|j,m /cm^)
= TTDpi2 ANt (4)
The underlying assumption here is that all the particles are spherical which
in many cases is not valid. For nonspherical particles, a shape factor will
enter Eq. (2) whose value depends upon the definition of the diameter of
the nonspherical particle itself.
-------
RM-2.3-3
The differential size distributions are calculated in the following way:
Alog Dae. = log1Q
i
I
Dae upper boundary of class i I ,,-v
Dae lower boundary of class ij
(AX/Alog Dae) . = j (6)
/\ .LO & u
where X is mass, surface or number concentration.
The distributions AM/Alog Dae, AS/Alog Dae or AN/Alog Dae are usually
displayed on a semi-log graph with the distribution function as the ordinate
and log Dae as the abscissa.
The cumulative size distributions are calculated by summing mass, surface
or number concentrations in the classes below the class of interest, and
dividing it by the total concentration.
4- ^
cum % less xฑ = () AX, / > AKk) 100 (7)
/i K /__,
k=l
where X = mass, surface or number
x = particle diameter
j = number of classes + 1
i = class number of interest.
Note that particle sizes decrease with increasing class number.
-------
RM-3.0-0
SECTION 3
FPEIS DATA DEFINITIONS AND PROTOCOL
CONTENTS
Number Item Page
3.0 List of Tables RM-3.0-1
Introduction RM-3.0-2
3.1 Data Elements and Definitions RM-3.1-1
3.1.1 Source Description RM-3.1.1-1
3.1.2 Test Series Remarks RM-3.1.2-1
3.1.3 Control Device Characteristics and Design
Parameters RM-3. 1.3-1
3.1.4 Test Characteristics and Control Device
Operating Parameters RM-3.1.4-1
3.1.5 Subseries Remarks, Mass Train Results and
Physical Properties of the Particulate. ...... RM-3.1.5-1
3.1.6 Particulate Bioassay Data ..... .. RM-3.1.6-1
3.1.7 Particulate Chemical Composition RM-3.1.7-1
3.1.8 Measurements Particulars. ... RM-3.1.8-1
3.1.9 Particulate Size Distribution Data RM-3.1.9-1
3.2 Standard Nomenclature ....... ..... RM-3.2-1
3.3 Use of Metric Units RM-3.3-1
-------
RM-3.0-1
SECTION 3
LIST OF TABLES
Number Title Page
3.2-1 Data Elements Requiring Standard Nomenclature RM-3.2-2
-------
RM-3.0-2
3.0 Introduction
This section provides definitions for all data elements contained in the
FPEIS. Specific data input instructions and encoding criteria are given
in the User Guide.'
For certain data elements defined, standard nomenclature is specified. For
example, on page 3.1.1-1 the Source Classification Codes from the NEDS Sys-
tem^' are used for source description related information (word descriptions,
not numeric codes). Other standard nomenclature for data are discussed in
detail in Section 3.2. All FPEIS data are reported in metric units. While
every attempt has been made to conform to SI (International System of
Units), for clarity other metric units have been used in some places.
These nomenclature specifications or protocol, and units have been developed
in an attempt to standardize and categorize the input information and data
to the FPEIS. For example, this standardization will allow a user who wants
to receive an output from the FPEIS to be able to (a) specify a particular
device class, if desired; or (b) be able to compare different devices within
a device class knowing that the data are given in common, standardized termi-
nology and units.
_!/ "Fine Particle Emissions Information System User Guide," EPA-600/276-
172, June 1976.
2y "Guide for Compiling a Comprehensive Emission Inventory," EPA No. APTD-
1135, NTIS No. PB 212-231, March 1973.
3/ "Standard Metric Practice Guide," ASTM No. E-380-74, American Society
for Testing and Materials, November 1974.
-------
RM-3.0-3
The standard nomenclature and protocol as discussed above provide a sys-
tem which is extremely flexible, yet standardized. Establishing of these
parameters in this manner will allow expansion, modification, and addi-
tional capabilities for these particular portions of the FPEIS as the sys-
tem grows so that users may obtain the widest possible spectrum of informa-
tion and data in a common format.
-------
KM-3.1-1
3.1 Data Elements and Definitions
Data element definitions are grouped in the following subsections generally
as discussed in Section 2.2. These definitions identify the particular data
element and give an example of a typical value. Data elements which require
the use of FPEIS standard nomenclature are identified in Section 3.2.
-------
RM-3.1.1-1
3.1.1 Source Description
Source Category
Type of Operation
Feed Material Class
Operating Mode Class
Site Name
Source Name
UTM-X
UTM-Y
Zone Location
Address
Source identifier.
Example: EXTCOMB BOILER
Specific operation which was tested.
Example: ELECTRIC GENERATION
Specific type of material used as
fuel feed.
Example: BITUMINOUS COAL
Size and characteristics of opera-
tion.
Example: LARGER THAN 100 MBTU PULV
DRY
Complete and unique name of company
(and, if applicable, plant or sta-
t ion).
Example: UNION ELECTRIC MERAMEC
STATION
Specific source tested within the
site designated in the previous data
element.
Example: MERAMEC UNIT 1
UTM horizontal coordinate as shown
on USGS maps with scales less than
1:62,500.
Example: 473.0
UTM vertical coordinate as shown on
USGS maps with scales less than
1:62,500.
Example: 3921
Universal Transverse Mercator Co-
ordinates (UTM) zone location as
found on United States Geological
Survey (USGS) maps showing UTM Co-
ordinates.
Example: 12 (FOR ROCKY MOUNTAIN STATES)
Street number and street name, ab-
breviated if necessary.
Example: 1234 RIVER RD
-------
SM-3.1.1-2
City
Zip Code
Test Series Number
Test Series Reference
Name of Testing Group
Series Start Date
Series Finish Date
City name, abbreviated if necessary.
Example: ST. LOUIS
Five digit number designating postal
area.
Example: 63102
Numerical identifier for specific
test series. Each test series will
be assigned an identifier from a
master file listing by the data base
administrator as received.
Example: 14
Reference of the report from which
the data have been extracted.
Example: EPA 650/2-74-031, APRIL
1974
Complete and uniquely identifiable
name of testing group.
Example: MIDWEST RESEARCH INSTITUTE
Start date for the series in the for-
mat month/day/year.
example: 05/12/75
Finish date for the test series in
the format month/day/year.
Example: 05/23/75
-------
RM-3.1.2-1
3.1.2 Test Series Remarks
Test Series Remarks
Any comments or data not elsewhere
reported, which are specifically re-
lated to the test series.
Included in these remarks are physi-
cal and/or chemical properties which
may have been measured, such as cor-
rosiveness or solubility, which are
not included elsewhere.
This space may indicate a subjective
judgment of the value of the data,
measurement technique, etc., which
may have a bearing on the general
usefulness of a given test run, sub-
series or test series and the reli-
ability of the data.
-------
RM-3.1.3-1
3.1.3 Control Device Characteristics and Design Parameters
Device Category
Device Class
Generic Device Type
Device Commercial Name
Manufacturer
Device Description
A specific definition of the generic
device. Standard nomenclature will
be used. For the appropriate generic
device, only its name or combination
of words are used.
Example: CONTINUOUSLY CLEANED RE-
VERSE AIR, HI PRESSURE AIR
A designation of the state of develop-
ment of the control device using stan-
dard nomenclature.
Example: PILOT SCALE
General classification of control
device in operation during test. The
generic device types will use stan-
dard nomenclature.
Example: FABRIC FILTER
Commercial or given name of the de-
vice.
Example: STEAM-HYDRO SCRUBBER
Complete name of manufacturer.
Example: RESEARCH COTTRELL
One line qualifier to allow inser-
tion of additional information for
unusual or hybrid devices not com-
pletely described previously.
Example: ATOMIZED SPRAY IS SUBJECTED
TO ELECTRICAL FIELD FOR
CHARGING OF DROPLETS
Design Specification Type
Design Specification
Value
Descriptive word for design specifi-
cation, as appropriate for generic
device type. Additional specifica-
tion types required for more complete
characterization of the device may
be included.
Example: DESIGN VOLUME
The numerical value and units cor-
responding to the design specifica-
tion type.
Example: 20,000 DNM3/MIN
-------
RM-3.1.4-1
3.1.4 Test Characteristics and Control Device Operating Parameters
Subseries Number
Subseries Test Date
Subseries Start Time
Subseries Stop Time
Sample Location
Sampling Location
Description
Source Operating Mode
Sequential) nonzero number assigned
to the group of run numbers compris-
ing the subseries, to be assigned
by the data encoder.
Example: 14
Date of test in format month/day/year.
Example: 05/15/75
Start time of subseries based on 24
hr local standard time.
Example: 1230 (NOTE: NO COLONS)
Stop time of subseries based on 24
hr local standard time.
Example: 1610 (NOTE: NO COLONS)
Location of sampling train for this
run relative to the control device,
either inlet (I) or outlet (0).
Example: I (FOR INLET)
A brief description of the sample
train location relative to signifi-
cant flow disturbances.
Example: TEN DUCT DIAMETERS DOWN-
STREAM FROM 90 DEGREE BEND
Brief description of source opera-
tion at time of run. Most sources
will be steady-state, but for sources
with cyclic operations or specific
disturbances, this information is
required. In the case of an arc fur-
nace such description may include
"oxygen-lancing," "charging," "pouring,"
etc.
Example: OXYGEN-LANCING
-------
RM-3.1.4-2
% Design Capacity
Source Operating Rate
Source Feed Material
Feed Material
Composition
Volumetric Flow Rate
Gas Velocity at Sampling
Location
Gas Temperature at
Sampling Location
Pressure at Sampling
Location
Moisture Content
Percent Isokinetic
Sampling
An estimate of the source operation
rate as a percent of design capacity.
Full load or production rate is defined
as 100%.
Example: 95
Operating rate of source per unit
t ime.
Example: 10 MG/HR
Specific type of fuel or feed mate-
rial used during run.
Example: PULVERIZED BITUMINOUS COAL
Percentage data of feed material for
appropriate constituents.
Example: 4.1% S, 10.2% ASH
Stack gas flow rate (from EPA Method
1) in units of DNm3/S.
Example: 20
Velocity of gas stream at the sam-
pling location for this run in units
of meters per second.
Example: 20.4
Temperature of gas stream at the
sampling location for this run in
ฐC.
Example: 61
Stack pressure at the sampling loca-
tion for this run in mm Hg gauge.
Example: 740
Percent moisture by volume (as from
EPA Method 4).
Example: 17.4
100 Times the ratio of the average
velocity of the gas entering the
sampling nozzle to velocity of the
flue gas streams at the sampling
po int.
Example: 98.7
-------
RM-3.1.4-3
Gas Composition
Trace Gases in PPM
Percent of 002 > ฐ2ป ฐฐป and N2 by
volume dry (as from EPA Method 3)
% C0
Example:
02
00
N2 = 100%.
12 (FOR 002>, 6 (FOR 02),
0.5 (FOR 00), 81.5 (FOR
N2).
Chemical symbol and measured concen-
trations for trace gases measured
during test run in parts per million
(ppm) .
Example: S02 - 300, N02 - 50, Cl -
200
Typical Operating
Parameter Type
Typical Operating
Parameter Value
Descriptive word for typical oper-
ating parameter as appropriate for
generic device type operation. Addi-
tional operating parameter types may
be included as required for more com-
plete description of device operational
characteristics.
Example: RAPPING FREQUENCY
The numerical value and units cor-
responding to the typical operating
parameter.
Example: 2 PER MINUTE
-------
KM-3.1.5-1
3.1.5 Subseries Remarks, Mass Train Results and Physical Properties
Subseries Remarks
Any comments or data not elsewhere
reported, which are specifically re-
lated to the Subseries.
Example: GAS VELOCITY DECREASED
SLIGHTLY WHEN DUCT BY-
PASS VENT WAS CLOSED
Mass Train-Total Mass
Concentrat ion
Mass Train-Front Half
Mass Concentration
Mass Train Comments
Density
Density Determination
Resistivity
Resistivity Determination
The measured value for particulate
concentration from EPA Method 5 in
units of M-g/DNm3.
Example: 4.250 E + 03
The measured value for particulate
concentration for the front half of
the EPA Method 5 train (particulate
filter and probe wash) in units of
Example: 1.240 E + 02
Any comments or data not elsewhere
reported which are specifically re-
lated to the mass train data.
Example: MASS CONCENTRATION UNUSUALLY
LOW DUE TO UNEXPLAINED TRAIN
LEAKAGE BETWEEN FILTER AND
METER
The particle density, in units of
g/cm3.
Example: 1
An indication of whether the density
value was determined experimentally
or assumed. (1 = measured, 0 = assumed),
Examp le : 1
The resistivity of the particle in
units of ohm-centimeter.
Example: 4.11 x 10+11-
An indication of whether the resis-
tivity value was determined experi-
mentally or assumed. (1 = measured,
0 = assumed.)
Examp le : 1
-------
RM-3.1.5-2
Other Physical Properties Space for adding text comments re-
garding other physical properties
of the particulate which may have
been measured such as solubility.
Example: SOLUBILITY OF PARTICU-
LATE IN WATER IS 0.4 G/ML
-------
RM-3.1.6-1
3.1.6 Particulate Bioassay Data
Bioassay Test Type Indication of biological testing,
if done, with the collected partic-
ulate.
Example: NEONATAL-MOUS E
Bioassay Test Remarks Results of the indicated test as
above.
Example: SKIN PAINTING INDICATED
NO CHANGE DUE TO PARTIC-
ULATE USED
-------
RM-3.1.7-1
3.1.7 Particulate Chemical Composition
Particle Boundary
Diameter
Designation of Boundary
Determination
SAKOAD Chemical ID
Analysis Method
Mass Train Filter or
Pooled Stages
Chemical Concentration
(Stage)
The boundary diameter or cut point
for each interval or stage used by
the sampling equipment or method.
Up to nine intervals may be designated
The diameter is in units of p,m.
Example: 3.5
Indication of the basis of whether
the boundary diameter is calculated
from theory or based on calibration.
(1 = calibrated, 0 = calculated.)
Example: 1
The element or compound number from
the SAROAD System of the specific
chemical(s) for which analysis was
performed.
The identification letter of the spe-
cific analysis method used. Standard
nomenclature is used.
Example: B (FOR CHEMILUMINESCENCE)
The total concentration of the chemi-
cal listed as measured for particu-
late from the mass train filter, or
the concentration of the chemical
as measured for particulate combined
from two or more stages. Units are
(ig/DNm3.
Example: 47.3
Concentration of the chemical listed
from analysis of the particulate for
the indicated stage or interval. Units
are ^g/DNm .
Example: 2.1+1
-------
EM-3.1.8-1
3.1.8 Measurement Particulars
Run Number
Measurement Instrument/
Method Name
Size Range Lower Limit
Size Range Upper Limit
Sampling Start Time
Collection Surface/Sub-
strate and its Specifi-
cations
Comments on the Measure-
ment
Sampling Duration
Sampling Flow Rate
Dilution Factor
Unique number assigned to each run
within the test series.
Example: 02
Particulate size measuring equipment
(including model type, if applicable).
Example: UW MARK III IMP ACTOR
Lower limit of the size range for
the equipment/method specified in
units of micrometers (|J.m).
Example: 0.40
Upper limit of the size range for
the equipment specified in units of
micrometers (^m).
Example: 10.00
Start time of run based on 24 hr local
standard time.
Example: 1345 (NOTE: NO COLONS)
Identification of the collection
surface or substrate and a brief
description of its specifications,
i.e., model number, type, manufac-r
turer.
Example: GLASS FIBER FILTER, GELMAN,
TYPE A
Additional text comments or data
regarding the run.
Example: SUBSTRATE ON STAGE 1 SHOWED
WEIGHT LOSS OF 0.05 M-G.
The length of time for the measure-
ment in minutes.
Example: 45
Sampling flow rate for this run in
nr/min.
Example: 4.5
Dilution factor used for sampling
methods which require dilution (i.e.,
diffusion battery).
Example: 1.0 (FOR NO DILUTION)
-------
RM-3.1.8-2
Sampling Train Temperature maintained at the saru-
Temperature pling train for the duration of the
run in ฐC.
Example: 42
Pressure at Sample The absolute pressure of the gas at
Train Location the inlet to the sample train in
units of mm Hg.
Example: 750
Percent Moisture The percent water vapor by volume
in the gas sampled by the instrument,
Example: 72.5
-------
KM-3.1.9-1
3.1.9 Particulate Size Distribution Data
Particle Diameter Basis
Concentration Basis
Upper Diameter Boundary
Diameter Boundary
Ca1ibrat ion/Calculat ion
Mass or Number Data
Indication of the type of diameter
specific for this measurement - 1 =
aerodynamic, 0 = Stokes.
Example: 1 (FOR AERODYNAMIC)
Indication of the type of measure-
ment/calculations used in obtaining
concentration for this measurement -
mass or numer (mass = 1; number = 0).
Example: 1 (FOR MASS)
The upper diameter boundary point
in units of micrometers (M-m) for the
specific basis used for particle
measurement.
Example: 20.00
The class interval boundary point
(particle diameter) for the specific
basis used for measurements. Units
are micrometers (fJ-m).
Example: 13.770
Indication of whether the data are
based on calibrated or calculated
diameter boundary. (1 = calibration,
0 = calculation.)
Example: 0 (FOR CALCULATION)
The mass or number measured for the
indicated stage in units of
or number/cm^.
Example: 2.980 + 6
-------
RM-3.2-1
3.2 Standard Nomenclature
Computerized information systems require that some standardization of data
be present in order for specific data selection to be made. Computers search
for and select data by comparing the selected value to a known value. When
alphanumeric characters are used, such as in the name of a control device,
the known value and the selected value must match exactly. For example,
if a search is made for the value "ESP," all entries in the data base
whose value is "ESP" will be selected; however, entries having the value
"ELECTROSTATIC PRECIPITATOR" will not, although it is technically correct.
To ensure that uniform selection criteria are possible, the FPEIS uses stan-
dard nomenclature for certain data elements. The permitted values for these
data elements are given in the FPEIS User Guide (Section 2.1.6). Whenever
data from one of these data elements is requested, it is essential that
correct spelling be used or the request will fail.
Data elements in the FPEIS data base which require the use of standard
nomenclature are given in Table 3.2-1.
-------
RM-3.2-2
TABLE 3.2-1. DATA ELEMENTS REQUIRING STANDARD NOMENCLATURE
Source Description;
Source Category
Type of Operation
Feed Material Class
Operating Mode Class
State
Control Device Characteristics and Design Parameters;
Device Category
Device Class
Generic Device Type
Design Specification
Test Characteristics and Control Device Operating
Parameters;
Sampling Location
Typical Operating Parameter Type
Particulate Bioassay Data;
Bioassay Test Type
Particulate Chemical Composition;
SAROAD Chemical ID
Analysis Method
Measurement Particulars;
Measurement Instrument/Method Name
-------
RM-3.3-1
3.3 Use of Metric Units
It is EPA policy to use metric units in all publications. Consistent with
this policy, the FPEIS uses metric units throughout. Every attempt has been
made to use SI (International System of Units) protocol; however, some data
elements are given in the metric equivalent of their English units for clar-
ity. For example, the SI unit for pressure is the pascal (Pa). The FPEIS
reports pressure in units of millimeters of mercury (mm Hg) which is anal-
ogous to the more common inches of mercury (in. Hg).
The specific units in which a particular data element should be encoded
are given in the FPEIS User Guide (Section 2.1.6).
-------
RM-4.0-0
SECTION 4
USER REQUEST COMMAND ABSTRACTS
CONTENTS
Number Item
4.0 Introduction RM-4.0-1
4ซ1 System Request Command Abstracts
C3000 FPEIS Summary Report - Complete 0 RM-4.1-1
-------
RM-4.0-1
4.0 Introduction
A user feature of the FPEIS is a catalog of pre-defined user request pro-
cedures, called System Request Commands (SRC)* Each SRC defines a partic-
ular task to be performed, and each SRC is identified by a unique number
which may be referenced by the user to request a specific task. The detailed
instructions on the use of the System Request Commands are given in Section
5 of the FPEIS User Guide.
This section contains an abstract of each SRC available. Additional abstracts
will be added as new SRC's are defined and developed in the future.
-------
RM-4.1-1
SRC Number; C3000
Title; FPEIS SUMMARY REPORT - COMPLETE
This SRC results in a complete listing of the contents of the FPEIS data
base in standard report format. The data are ordered by Test Series Num-
ber. The listing will involve several thousand pages of computer output.
A sample output for only one test series is given on the following pages.
-------
FINF PARTICULATE EMISSIONS INFORMATION SYSTEM
FPFIS SUMMARY REPORT
TFST SEWIKS Mซ:
ST Si-PIKS AT SITF FWOM l?/flA/73 TO 12/14/73 BY: MIDWEST RESEARCH INST.. KANSAS CITYt MO.
P.'-iCF: SHf.NNON. L.J.- FT AL.ซ FPA-6SO/?-14-073ซ AUG. 74
E CHAPACTF.HIST ICS-
SCC
OF'F. WAT I ON CLASS :
Fttl.1 MATERIAL CLASS:
F/TCOMH HOII.FR
ELFCTPIC f-iENFMATN
SOLID WASTK/COAL
(JMFHATION MODf CLASS: G.T. 100MMHTU/HR
SITE NAME MF.HAMEC PLANT
SOURCE NAMF ROILFR UNIT 1
ADDRESS nzoo FINE ROAD
ST. LOUIS
IJTM 70NE AND X-Y COORDS: 15
MO 63120
725.0 475.0
CONTROL DEVICF(S) ChARACTFRISTICS-
COMMFRCIAL NAME: ELECTROSTATIC PRECIPITATOR
MANUFACTURER: RESEARCH COTTRELL
UNIT 1
OHMCE KFNEWIC TYPF :
CATtGClWY: PAPALI..FR PLATE FSP
CLASS: CONV^N'TIONAI.
DESCRIPTION: ?-UNITS IN PARALLEL WITH COMMON INLET DUCT AND SEPARATE OUT-
LET DUCTS.
CO'-ITPOL DtVlCF(S) MFSlr.N PAPAMRTEPS - -
1 ) F.LFrTKOIIF ARF.A
?) COMOMA WIPE DIA.
3) PLATF. TO PLATF SPACING
5174.S M?
2.8 MM
?38 MM
TEST SFPItS
CUT POINTS COMPUTED FROM PANZ AND WONG THEORY
-------
TEST SEWIKS NO:
Sii?
STAGE STAGE STAGE STAGE STAGE STAGE STAGE STAGE
2 1 4 5 6 78 9
ATOMIC.
1 )
ATOMIC ft.8*3 2.24*2 8.63*1
4.9 *1 3.7 ป0 3.3 ป0
I
U>
2.27*?
1.32*2 4.91*2
1.32*2
1.68*2
-------
t>) l.tAU
ATOMIC ABSORPTION
7) MANbANtSt
ATOMIC ABSORPTION
B> NICKhL
ATOMIC ABSORPTION
9) TELLURIUM
ATOMIC ABSORPTION
10) THALLIUM
ATOM1C AHbOPPlION
11) TIM
ATOMIC ABSORPTION
1?) VANAOIHM
ATOMIC ABSORPTION
13) ZIMC
ATO'MC ABSORPTION
14) CALCIU.-1
ATOMIC AMSOWPT10N
IS) I PON
ATOMIC AMSORPTION
4.^*1 1.26*1 1.35*1 2.57*1 1.05*1 9.14-1
S.66*? 1.30*? 2.39*? 1.65*2 4.96*2 3.25*1
1.43*3 4. ป? 7.31*2 6. +2 2.14*3
1.1 *1 1.9 *0 1.9 *0 2.6 *0 5.5 *0
3.ซ +0 1. *0 1.? ป0 1.8 *0 4.1 *0
1.1*1 H.lป0 6.6*0 3.7*0 9. *0
1.43*3 4.14*? 7.13*2 5.16*2 6.46*2
3.43*1
8.64-1
5.06-1
3.43*1
6.87*1
2.04*0
1.38*0 2.71*0
2.3 *0 1.63*0
7.71*1 9.79*1
1.35*3 6.89*? 9.66*? 6.80*2 2.32*3 2.29*2 2.03+2
7.3 *4 1.68*4 2.94*4 1.68*4 6.71*4 4.20*3 6.90*3
4.?6*5 1.26*5 1.35*5 ?.57*5 1.05*5 9.14+3 5.06+3
-------
TEST
(fS MO:
PUN NO: 1
DEVICE INLET
MFASUKF"FNT
MEAS. INST/^t.THOI): I MPIMKS "MS-IT
COLLECTION SU^Hftcr/SURST^ATF: STAINLESS STFFL
Ml-4S. STA*T TIM)-: :\'\n SAMPLING PfPIOO: 1S.O MTN
GAS SAMPLI<'''; ('((NOITIONS: TFซP= 1 ft* C
OH T.'t
(UNCALIHHflTEfJ) SI7F. RANGE: .100 TO 15.000 UM
SAMPLING RATE: i.a? LPM DILUTION FACTOR:
PPESSUHt= 7f>0 MMHG HATER VAP %VOL = 9.7
1.0
PAPTICLF SI/F
|i/\TA
AFPO
*
15
7
3
?
]
nYM**U
NO-Y
.000
.500
.HI) 7
,?99
.545
.740
.409
.100
: DI/I (UM)
"in I-M
10.6U7
5.343
2.9SH
] . hMS
1 . 1 (I ^
. b^H
.20?
PaPT ICLF
RNntvY
0.^4
4 .'-(SI
'.son
1.500
1 .000
.soo
* r T> 11
.M54
[II A (I.IM)
Tn PT
7.011
3 . M ฐ
1 . 9 3 ft
1 .225
.707
. 354
. 1 1*.
I1M
OM/ni.OAE
(UG/DNM3)
PARTICLE OFNSITY= 2.27 GM/CC
OS
(UMP/CC)
DS/OLOAE
(UM2/CO
ON
(NO./CO
ON/DLOAE
(NO./CO
p.qcjqf ป05
4 ,5ft4Fป 04
H.202K+03
1 .K54E+04
3.837F+05
2.644E+05
2.869E+04
3.031E+04
1.131Eป05
8.4H9E+04
1.275E*05
9.P51E+04
1.039F+05
6.132E+04
4.237E+05
3.756F+05
2.8ซ3Eป05
5.822E+05
5.707Fป05
3.5ft8F+05
2. 145Eป05
6.926E*05
7.321E*02
2.183E*03
1.082E+04
2.091E+04
6.613Eป04
1.562Eป05
1.008E*07
2.432Eป03
7.413E+03
4.942Eป04
1.211Eป05
a.370Eป05
5.463E+05
1.64BE+07
CUM M
(*,)
TOTAL MASS COMC=
. Of
-------
TEST
MO:
HO:
NO:
CONTROL OEVICE INLFT
MEASUREMENT MARTICUI AKS-
( UMCAL I HRATEO)
SIZE RANGE: .100 TO is.ooo UM
MFซS. [NST/"tHnn: ] wuiNxs UMS-IT
COLLECTION SU^-FACP '/StJHSTRATF : "^TAINLFSS STEEL
"f-AS. STflfcT TIMt: 1030 ซ;AMPlTNr; PERIOO: ?0.0 WIN SAMPLING PATE: 1.87 LPM DILUTION FACTOR:
i.o
C,AS <;AMPL IN
fOMMFNT*. ON
oi r ION<; : TfMp=
MEASUREMENT:
PPESSHRE=
7*0 MMHU
WATER VAP
-------
TF.ST SFRIF.S NO:
'OUTLET
TEST DATE: 12/04/73 FROM oe:*o TO 11:00 HOUR
TF.ST CH4PAC ft-"ISTltb
SOtlPCE OPtRATlN<; Moot": C04|_ปwFFUSF miPNTNn SOURCE OPERATING RATF: 120 MW PCT DESIGN CAPACIT Y: 100,
FfcFP MATKRIAL: O^TFMT ซ. COAI AND MUM. OEFUC.E. FF.EO MATERIAL COMPOSITION: 9* REFUSE
CONTROL, otvrc"-: oim f-i ซ;AMPI. IM^ POIMT DESCRIPTION: SAMPLING PORTS IMMEDIATELY BEHIND AN ELB % ISOKINETIC: 100
PROCF.SS CONDITIONS: VOL FI.Os- 1 < 1 . T ONM1/S VFLOCITY= 15.7 M/S T= 166 C P= 760 MMHG WATER VAP *VOL= R.5
r,Aซ. COMPOS1 T I'ii-i: OOSAT- CO?= 14.SO * C0= .01 * 02= 6.SO * N2= 79.00 *
TPflCF r;ซSSES (PPM) -S0? =
-------
TEST SERIES no:
SlMSFMItS 'JO:
M.IN MO: 1
CONTROL DEVICE OUTLET
HARricuLซiJs-
(UNCALIBRATEO)
SIZE RANGE: .100 TO 15.000 UM
INST/NETHOli: ? ANOEPSFN MOUFL IV
COLLECTION SU*|-ACF/SUHST^ A TF : GLASS FldFP FHTEP
"FAS. STAR! TIMF: "40 SAMPLING PEPTOO: 20.0 MIN SAMPLING PATE: 20.2? LPM DILUTION FACTOR:
1.0
GAS SAMPLING CONDITION":: TFMP =
u,j luf.
PPFSSURE=
7ซSO MMHG
WATEP VAP %VOL = fl.5
PAKTICLH SI7E'OISIKIBUIION DATA
1C 01A (DM) P4RT1CLF OIA (U'*>
M|U Pi MNilWY MIO PT
1 S . 0 0 0
1 1 .500
7.180
3.310
2.120
1 .060
.440
.100
9. Ob?
5.9U?
4.011
2.649
1 .4^^
.830
7.606
4.739
?. 1 M
1 . 381
.679
.408
fl.690
*-.OOT
3."93
1.731
DM
OM/OLDAF-
PARTICLE DENSITY= 2.27 GM/CC
PS
(UMP/CC)
DS/OLDAE
(IJMP/CC)
ON
(NO./CO
DN/DLDAE
(NO./CO
.210
.Ob4
1 .476F+04
1 .3ซ7Fป04
1 .5R?Eซ04
9.097F*03
1 .433E+04
1 .SOOF+04
4.PS3F+03
2.3<ป7K + n3
4.7SOh>03
1 .279E+05
6.780E+04
9.334E*04
S.4S4Eป04
7.406E+04
5.009Eป04
2.00?Eป04
1.414E+04
7.382E+03
4.489Eป03 I
6.107E*03 i
1.074Eป04 t
9.125E+03 <
2. 188E+04
4.117F+04
2.136F+04
1.9Q9E+04
1.044Eป05
J.891E+04
'.985Eป04
>.337E*04
>.470Eป04
.131Eป05
.36HF+05
.006E*05
.126E*05
.623E+05
1.892E+01
5.393E*01
2.255E+02
4.183Eป02
2.323Eป03
1.398E+04
2.456E+04
5.515E*04
2.298E+06
1.640E*02
2.636Eป02
1.331E+03
2.508Eป03
1.201E*04
4.644E+04
1.156Eป05
3.254E*05
3.571E+06
CUM M
TOTAL
COMC=
TOTAL SUPF CONC= ?.3R4E+OS
TOTAL NUM CONC= 2.395E*06
00
-------
TFST SFP1RS MO:
SHM5FP1FS MO:
PON Nil: ? CONTROL OEVICF OUTLFT
MF. ASUHF^F
F.-ioo: 3 CLIVFI MODFL CL-?O* OPC ( CALIHPATF.IM SI?F RANGE: .fiso TO i.soo UM
COLLFCT10M Sil'-'FACF'/SUF'STI'ATP :
"FAS. STflMT Tl-lt:
-------
TFST SF^ItS MO:
- ' If- ^ '-'0 :
MO:
CONTWOL DEVICE OUTLET
MF
MtAS. INST/MFTHOn: 4 CM COl'NTFW/OlFF. HATTFPY
COLL FCTION SU^f-ACF/SunST'iftTF:
''FAS. STAUT TIHF: ioto SAMPLING PEPIOP: o.o MIN
GAS SAMPLING CONDITIONS: TFMP =
COMMFMTS OM 1 H^; M
n
( CALIWPATRO) SIZF RANGE: .010 TO .200 UM
SAMPLING PATE: 0.00 LPM DILUTION FACTOR:
= 0 MMHG WATEP VAP *VOL = 0.0
1.0
PARTICLE Sr/F OISTH IrtUTlON
A(- RClOVtJAM I
HMOH V
C OIA (UM)
MID M r
HAkTICLF OTA dlf")
HM'iPy ป\n PT
DM
DM/OLDAF
H
ns
.PH'J
.117
.02'-*
.0)7
..1"3 .131
,0hซ .OR1
.014 .030
.OOH .011
7-.007Fป0?
1 .972F-01
1.4?HE+03
2.9S6E+01
8.579E-01
PARTICLE OENSITY=
DS/DLDAF
1.576E+03
6.8P3E+04
4.648E+04
2.610E+03
2.143Fป02
ON
2.500E+05
4.200Eป05
5.600E+05
1.400E+05
ON/OLOAE
1.226E+06
2.244E*06
9.273E+05
6.089E+05
CUM M
TOTAL
COMC= 9.HSQFtO?
TOTAL SURF COMC= 2.424E+04
TOTAL MUM CONC= 1.370E*06
I
I1
O
-------
RM-5.0-0
SECTION 5
APPENDIX
CONTENTS
Number Item Page
5.1 Sample FPEIS Data Input Forms . RM-5.1-1
5.2 Example of FPEIS Standard Report Output RM-5.2-1
5.3 Test Series Numbers and Reference in the FPEIS .... RM-5.3-1
-------
RM-5.1-1
5.1 Sample FPEIS Data Input Forms
Standard data input forms have been developed for the FPEIS. Samples of
completed forms are provided in pages RM-5.1-2 through RM-5.1-7. Detailed
instructions for completing the forms are given in the FPEIS User Guide.
-------
STATIONARY POINT SOURCE
Form I 12/76
A
- SOURCE
Telt Serlei
No. j
1
1
1
4
<<
1
3
DESCRIPTION
NP,
f
f
*
Ron
t
to
Cord
No.
II
A
11
0
11
1
Caid
No.'
II
A
u
0
11
2
Card
No.
II
A
1]
0
11
3
14
ft
14
14
Card |
No.i \
II
A
11
0
Card
No.
II
A
11
0
-!aJ5
4\
11
5
ซ~
14
It
If
15
I*
fINE PARTICULAR EMISSDONS INFORMATION SYSTEM
DATA INPUT FORMS
SCC 1 (Soutce Category
14
L
17
(V
ii
z>
B
J
*
ซ
R
a
/
14
A
11
7
16
17
P
11
ft
it
(ti
M
r
11
?
11
,f
SCC IIJT^pe
n
P
14 1
*
SCC IV (Operating Mode Clou)
16
C
17
4
II
A
it
/
10
A
ฃ
a
11
14
13
16
17
11
It
M
11
11
a
14 \1
314
u
/M/*
of Operation)
11
K
19
V
ซ0
ft
[Site Name '
3134
lv
17
f
31
n
It
40
1
Source Name '
16
c
17
<2
it
/?
it
s
Zlpl
14
17
II
It
Reference
16
y
17
(t
II
$
It
7
M
A,
K
y
11
R
u
*
14
M
6
14
17
11
n
UTM Coordi
X
11
u
n
10
11
n
X
n
14
Y
M
14
17
11
n
30
M
11
11
a
14 ]
Toiled By
11
J
11
11
C
14 J
X.
14
U
14
17
f
11
7
ป
I(T
11
n
J4 "
/
15 16
17
It
a
40
41
ฃ
Sh
41
13 14
*#-
17
4
M
m
19
a
40
t
41
5 14
*/?
17
$
31
ฃ
19
/?
40
ฃ
41
S
41
41
4
4]
41
r
44
ฃ
eel
41
41
44
i
44
47
41
43
y
44
47
fe
49
Form Completed by
SCC III (Feed Material Clan)
50
SI
/
31
N
51
C
54
33
5
54
^
57
31
/L
39
7
60
/
61
A/
61
3
61
64
63
64
Tel* Seiies
Stocl Dale
Mo
67
O
61
6
Do
49J70
^M
Yr
71
7
71
3
Flnlili Dole
Mo
-^
Olo
Da
75J76
w
41 4ป
/
^T"1"I*'
rV
"1
Trn
50
c
SI
51
C
S3
<&
54
13
34
57
3t
59
60
10
11
u
51
54
53
54
57
31
59
60
61
61
61
64
65
66
67
61
ซ
70
71
71
71
74
73
Yr
77(71
m
UTM
Zone
TV
7
76
77
7ป
-*
City
61
?
41
L
64
ft
61
e
64|47
$7
61
0
V
70
71
71
71
74
73
41
S
41
r
44
41
ง
41
44
R
43
4
43
e
44
L
47
41
44
47
ป
41
K
4t
50
f>
SI
if
51
/?
11
i>
34
U
55
ฃ
54
57
0
31
H
39
/
60
V
41
4*
61
*
61
s
64
/
65
r
66
V
67
66
69
70
71
71
71
74
75
76
77
l
71
60
^
SloU
TV
P
TlF^
49
f
X
SI
A/
11
S
51
P
54
r
33
A
56
A
37
M
31
/v
59
60
61
C-
61
T
61
_
64
63
S
66
/
67
0
68
A
69
70
71
72
71
74
75/.
n
7t
79
\n
1
60
A
BO
10
B - TEST SERIES REMARKS
Teซl Setlei
No. !
l
l
l
4
1
SiJ
*H*
ปซ
H.
1
ป
M
Cord
No.:
II
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
6
B
B
U
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
11
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
0
M
U
Remarks In Text
It
17
II
It
M
11
-
11
11
14
13
16
17
IB
19
10
11
n
u
M
13
-
16
17
-
H
19
40
41
41
-
4]
-
-
44
_
45
-
44
-
47
4t
49
10
31
51
51
54
55
54
-
37
-
31
J(
-
60
61
-
61
-
6]
64
-
65
66
67
69
49
70
71
71
71
74
75
76
77
71
-
79
-
CO
I
N)
-------
STATIONARY POINT SOURCE
Form 2 12/76
FINE PARTICULATE EMISSIONS
DATA INPUT !
C - CONTROL DEVICE(S) CHARACTERISTICS
Test Series Sub
No. Series
No.
12 3 4 5
-------
STATIONARY (POINT SOURCE
Form 3 12/76
D -
FINE PARTICIPATE EMISSIONS INFORMATION SYSTEM
DATA INTUIT FORMS
TEST CHARACTERISTICS
Test Series
No.
1
2
4
3
Sub
Series
No.
/
Run
No,
10
Cord
No.
II
D
12
0
13
1
Cord
No.
II
JD
12
0
13
2
Cord
No.
II
D
12
0
13
3
Card
No.
II
D
12
0
13
4
U
14
14
14
f
IJ
0
t5
W
)i
Control Device Inlet or Outlet (I or
Test Sub Series
Date
Mo
16
o
17
6
Da
It
4
19
/
Yr
20
7
21
.*
Start
Time
22
/
23
*
24
O
IS
0
Stop
Time
26
/
27
*
28
o
29
r>
0)
*
Source Operating Mode
30
r
31
<*
32
*
33
/
34
A/
33
tf
J6
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
43
Feed Material
14
17
16
19
20
21
22
23
24
23
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
33
34
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
ti
46
47
48
49
30
31
a
33
34
55
5*
37
58
59
Form Completed by
Source Operating Rate*
40
4
61
6
42
ft
43
O
44
43
ซc
44
6
47
/
48
H
69
*
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
% Design
Capacity
77
78
ir
79
0,
80
Feed Material Composition*
46
47
48
49
30
31
32
S3
34
33
Sampling Location Description*
16
/
17
2
16
19
b
C02*
16
17
f
18
4
19
20
/
21
A
22
23
b
CO*,
20
21
f)
22
n
24
^
23
-S
26
T
27
1?
02*
24
/
23
/
26
1
27
28
e
29
4
30J3I
ซ
N2*
2ซ
ff
29
/
30
5
31
32
f
33
L
34
0
33
IV
36
37
z>
38
/
39
s
40
7
41
U
42
R
43
ฃ
44J43
4*
4*
c
47
ฃ
48
49
30
31
32
33
34
53
34
57
38
59
40
41
Volume
Flow Rate*
34
37
58
59
40
3
41
&
42
43
44
45
Velocity*
42
4]
44
ฃ
45
,4
44
47
48
49
Temp.
44
47
y
48
O
49
O
70
71
72
73
74
Press*
70
71
72
7
73
6
74
o
75
74
77|78
1
% H2O
75
/
74
/,
77
J
79
80
% Iso ,
Kinetic
78
/
79
O
80
O
Trace Gases in ppm (Text)
32
33
34
33
34
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
49
46
47
48
49
SO
31
52
S3
34
53
34
J7
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
44
47
48
49
70
71
72
7J
74
75
It,
77
78
79
80
CONTROL DEVICE(S) OPERATING PARAMETERS
Test Series
No.
I
Sub
Series
No.
Run
No.
1fl
Card
No.
11
D
D
D
D
D
0
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
12
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
U
0
U
0
0
0
U
0
0
0
13
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
&
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
b
5
5
5
r
14
w
o
M
16
17
-Device No. (1.2 or 3)
Specification
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
23
24
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
34
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
(4
45
44
47
Value*
48
49
50
51
52
S3
54
35
54
57
58
59
40
61
42
43
44
45
44
67
<*
K
70
n
n
n
7*
ป
7ป:
77
71
7>
M
Need not be filled if the preceding subseriei contains the same data.
-------
STATIONARY POINT SOURCE
Form 4 12/76
DATA INPUT FORMS
CONTROL DEVICE(S) OPERATING PARAMETERS (cont'd)
Test Ser
No.
1
}
ies
Sub
Series
No.
8
Run
No,
ป
10
Card
No.
11
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
12
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
13
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
r
14
tJ
0
ซ-?
V/lZ
16
17
Device No. (1,2 or 3)
Spec! Fi cation
18
IV
to
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
44
47
Form Completed by
Value *
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
it
ซ#
KS
\n
n
n
ป
n
u
n
78
79
80
SUBSERIES REMARKS
Test Series
No.
1
2
3
4
5
Sub
Series
No.
6
7
8
Ron
No.
ป
10
Card
No.
11
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
0
D
0
0
D
D
12
0
0
0
0
1
1
2
13
6
7
8
9
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
1
8
9
0
14
t*
Remarks in Text*
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
ปl
62
63
44
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
E - PARTICULATE MASS TRAIN RESULTS
Test Series
No. '
I
2
3
4
4
4
5
4
Sub
Series
No.
6
7
8
/
fcufl
Nn,
9
to
Card
No.
II
E
12
0
13
1
14
tJ
Front Half
16
17
2
18
19
ฃ
20
i
21
ป
E
23
+
24
f?
25
6
Total
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
E
33
+
34
35
Mass Train Comments^Text)
36
s
37
ir*
38
A
39
40
H
41
te
42
7
43
tj
44
*
45
D
46
47
5
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
S9
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
48
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
F - PARTICULATE PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
Test Series
No.
1
2
3
4
?
5
3
Sub
Series
No.
6
7
8
/
Run
No,
7
M
Card
No.
II
F
12
0
13
1
M
15
Density*
16
17
/,
18
19
20
o
Determination
Resistivity
21
/
22
23
5
24
25
+
26
/
27
/
-|
T
28
0
Jy
ซ
Other Physical Properties in Text .
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
SI
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
71
79
80
* Need not be filled if the preceding subseries contains the same data.
-------
STATIONARY POINT SOURCE
FormS 12/76
G
- PARTICIPATE
Test Series
No.
1
H
l
3
FINE PARTICIPATE EMISSIONS INFORMATION SYSTEM
DATA INlPUT FORMS
BIOASSAY DATA
Sub
Series
No.
- CHEMICAL
Test Series
No.
1
1
3
4
0
3
3
(ton
No.
10
Cord
No.
II
G
G
G
G
G
12
0
0
0
0
0
13
lซ
IJ
Bioastoy Test Type
14
17
II
COMPOSITION
Sub
Series
No.
6
7
8
/
Ryn
No.
1
H
Cord
No.
It
H
12
0
13
1
Cord
No.
II
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
12
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
13
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
14
14
IS
19
14
ซ
:)ซ
iซ
19
/
Analysis 1.
Chemical
I.D.
14
ซ?
2
17
/
/
/
/
it
/
2
6
1
IV
0
f?
7
k
20
21
22
13
24
11
14
27
Aerodynamic/Sto
| Colib or Cole ( 1 o
20
o
0.
1
20
A
Upper
Boundary
Diameter
21
i
22
O
23
24
11
26
Mast Train
Filter or
fooled' Stages
21
*
]
22
ป
*
n
24
2}
26
21
??
30
ii
32
33
34
35
-
Bioauay Comments
16
37
38
3V
to
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
4V
50
51
52
53
S4
55
56
Form Completed by
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
44
67
61
6V
70
71
7J
73
74
75
76
77
78
TV
80
)
*
>
65
O
1
fr
66
&
O
1
67
ฑ
*
f
+
68
f
1
. d>
6V
70
71
77
y
73
74
ฎ
ฑ
6V
/
f
7
70
*>
*
71
*
5
6
72
5
J
^
73
?
i!
t
f
74
4
3
4
1
-
(D
75J76
1
77
78
TV
80
ฎ
t
75
76
*
77
78
TV
80
-
Need not be filled if the preceding subseries contains the same data.
-------
STATIONARY POINT SOURCE
Form 6 12/76
I -
FINE PARTICULATE EMISSIONS INFORMATION SYSTEM
DATiA INPUT FORMS
MEASUREMENT PARTICULARS
Test Series
No.
I
4
$
Sub
Series
No.-
/
Run
No.
10
/
Card
No.
11
I
12
0
13
1
Card
No.
II
I
12
0
13
2
Card
No.
II
I
I
I
12
0
0
0
13
3
4
5
T
14
/
W
t*
i-
'
w
w
<*
Measurement Instrument/Method No.
Measurement Instrument/Method Name
14
X)
17
V
18
ฃ
19
e
20
*
21
s
22
ฃ
23
4
24
25
M
*ป
Measurement Size Range
Lower
14
17
18
!?
19
20
Upper
21
*
22
a
23
24
25
26
m
27
5>
28
C
29
/
30
31
I
32
I
33
r
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
Meas.
Start Time
46
/
47
3
41
4
4?
c
Sampling
Period **
50
51
52
53
4
54
Aerosol
Flow Rate**
55
56
57
/
58
ป,
59
4
60
Form Completed by
Gat Conditions at
Measurement Location
Temp.
61
42
9
63
o
64
O
Press .
65
46
67
7
48
*
69
O
%H2O
70
/
71
/,
72
3
n
74
23
Dilution
Factor
76
77
78
79
1,
80
Collection Surface/Substrate and its Specifications**
26
A
27
i
28
A
29
5
30
5
31
32
f
33
/
Mtu
df
36
*
37
38
39 Uo
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
41
62
63
64
u
66
67
6S
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
Comments on the Measurement
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
SI
52
53
54
55
54
57
58
59
60
61
42
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
J - PARTICULATE SIZE DISTRIBUTION DATA
Test Ser
No.
1
es
0
3
Sub
Series
No.
/
Run
No.
10
/
Cord
No.
II
J
J
J
12
0
0
0
13
1
2
3
Card
No.'
II
,J
J
J
12
0
0
0
13
4
5
6
r
14
/
r
14
/
r
15
/
f
15
/
Measurement Instrum
Aerodynamic/Stoke
J*
17
18
$
19
o
Q
20
21
f
22
23
Measurement Instrumc
Most/No- (' or 0)
ฑ
U
17
^
18
*
19
ff
20
o
21
22
f
23
V
ent/Method No.
s Diameter (1 or 0)
24
25
26
2
27
4
28
29
z
30
31
nt/Method No.
ฑ
ft
ฃ:-::
m
25
2
26
9
9
9
27
f
28
ซfr
29
30
+
31
4
32
33
34
/
35
*
36
37
/
38
39
ฑ
&
S*
iฃ
s*
33
.*
34
35
2
36
(.
37
38
4
39
9
Particle '.
40
41
42
/
43
O
44
45
46
47
Mass/Nui
ฑ
to
'-::::"
-:-:'
41
2
42
43
^
44
*
45
46
f
47
v
ize Data**
4*
m
50
51
7
52
53
54
55
nber Data
t
**
49
i
50
51
/
52
7
53
54
f
55
9
t*
w
M
59
4
60
61
6
62
63
ฑ
t*
57
3
58
59
*
60
.*
61
61
4
63
ซ
C
iW
ป
,
66
67
2
68
69
ฃ
70
71
ฑ
ซ*
f:':
65
7
66
67
5
61
4
69
70
4-
71
4
ilib or Cole (1 or 0)-
7i
7J
74
75
/
76
77
4
78
79
t
77
73
/
74
75
$
76
ff
77
78
+
79
ซ?
1
80
V
ft
** Need not be filled if the preceding subseries or run with this instrument/method contains the some data.
-------
RM-5.2-1
5.2 Example of FPEIS Standard Report Output
Both standard and optional formats are available for the output from the
FPEIS data base. An example of the standard FPEIS report format is pro-
vided in pages RM-5.2-2 through KM-5.2-4, as typical of FPEIS output.
-------
FIMF PAKT mil. ATE EMISSIONS INFORMATION SYSTFM
F'PFJS SUMMARY MFPORT
TFST SFPC-'S
IfST SM'tFS M SIH FUIIM n*/?l/73 TO
Cr: YOST. K.J. ซ T AL. .
PY : JACKO.R.B. F. T AL . ซ PURDUE UNIVERSITY
RFPORT NSF(HซNN) r,I
SOURCE CUAf'ftCTEHIST ICS
'JFOS sec cam;
CATI-HOwY! INDUSTRIAL PROOFS
oHM'ArtnN CLASS: PRIMARY MFTALS
I*L CLASS: /INC: SMFLTINP
M(il)F CLASS: COK|^I^,
NFW JERSFY ZINC CO.
COKfH NO.ft
SITE NAMF
SOURCE NAMF
ADDRESS
PALMERTON
UTM ?ONF AND X-Y COORDS: is
PA
-0.0
-0.0
CONTROL UFV1CMS) CHAWACTFH 1 ST ITS
UNrONTi'OLt.FD
TFST SFRItS
to
-------
TEST
NO:
SII"ShRTFS MO: 1
Lt T
TEST DATE: 06/21/73 FROM 13:00 TO 15:00 HOUR
TEST CHARACTERISTIC;,
SOUHCt OPEnATlNN MOOt: COKING SOURCE OPERATING RATE: 46HO Kfi/HR PCT DESIGN CAPACITY: 80.
FFFH MATt-HlAI.: FEED MATERIAL COMPOSITION:
CONTROL OKVICf IMLtT SAMPLING POINT ItFSCR t P T I ON: \? OIA ONSfPEAM FLOW DISTURBANCE * ISOKINETIC: 100
PROCESS CONDITIONS: VOL FLOw= 3.1 DNM3/S VH.OCITY= H.4 M/S T= Sป00 C P= 760 HMHG WATER VAP *VOL= 11.3
fi/vs COMPOSITION: OPSAT- CO/= 7.30 * C0= 0.00 % Q?= 11.20 * N3= 81.50 %
TPACF liASSFS (PPM)-
CONTHOL IHVICF.(S) OPt>.\riMfi PAHAMF.TF^S
PAPTICUl.ATt MASSTHAIN '-(KSIILTS
FrtONT MAL>= ?.J30FปOf. IJR/DNM3 TOTAI.=-0. COMMENTS: LPA MFTHOO 5
PARTICULATF PHYSICAL P^OPFHTIES
UKNSITY= 1.00 I'iM/CC ASSUMED HFSI ST I V I T Y = l.SOF+11 OHM-CM ASSUMED
CHFMICAI COMPOSITION OATA
Th SAHPl.Fw IJNCAt. I RปA TFO
12
?<*.? 1S.1
SAMPtFP STAfiF CUT POINTS (UM)
14567
10. 7. 4.6 2.4 1.4
8
.9
NAMf
ANAL YS1S
CHEMICAL CONCENTRATION IN (UM/ONM3)
MAS TปN STAfiF. STAGE STAGE STAGE STAGE STAGE STAGE STAGF STAGE
/POOI 0 1 2 3 4 S ft 7 89
I) CADMIUM
ATOMIC Aijsoopi ION
?} I FAD
ATOMIC AHSI.IUPTTON
3) 7 IMC
A TO"1C ftHSOPPT [ON
ซ> coppf- y
ATOMIC Al-isO^PI (ON
l.S *3
0.
*.*.?ป1
4.0M+1
I.H4ป3 1.32+3 l.OP+3
0.
1.20*3
0.
7.^3*3
4.0H+1
6.11*1
4.16 + 3
0.
1.63*3 6.06*3 1.45*4
8.20*2 2.63*3 5.57*3
9.13*3 3.10*4 6.5fl*4
0. 4.89*1 7.69*1
N>
Co
SUHSEPIFS HtMARKS-
-------
TFST SFMIKS MO:
4 j
NO:
no:
CONTKOL OEVFCF. INIFT
HAWT
"FAS. (NST/Mfc ft-lim: I ซNlปFปSFN MODFL 11 F
COLLECTION SU"I-AOF/SUHSTHATF : fiLASS FFNF
MFftS. MAHT TIMt-: 1 3<ปo SAMPLING PK.ป|OI>:
liAS SAMPLING CONDITIONS: TFMP= 400 C
COMMENTS UH THh
(UWCAL IHHATEDl SI7E RANRE: .900 TO 30.000 UM
?.0 MIN SAMPLING RATE: 18.40 LPM DILUTION FACTOR: 1.0
PPFSSUWf:= 760 MMHG WATER VAP %VOL = 11.3
PAWTICLF SI7F ItlSTtvIH'JTIOM H/1TA
AFRUDYNAM I(; OFA (UM)
RNOrtY MIL) PT
30.000
?4.?00 ?h.V44
IS. 100 14. 1 lh
10.000 1 ? . ? H n
7.000 H..1t. f
4.^00 S.h7S
i?.400 3.323
1.400 l.H.n
."00 1.1?.?
HAPF ICLF
SNOWY
30.000
?4.?00
1^.100
10.000
7.000
4.600
?.400
1.400
.'JtlO
OFA (t|M)
M i n p T
?6 . 044
1 *^ 1 1 6
!?.?ซซ
H . 3h 7
S.67S
3. 3? 3
1 . H 3 T
1.1??
OM
it ii' yiUkHtil k
3.HOOEป04
?.990Eซ04
3.?60E*04
?.4<^OFป04
?.170E*04
3.530Eป04
7.340Eป04
1 .SHOF*05
OM/OLOAF
1 1 ifi /ntvjM 1 1
I U\J/Url~-J I
4.073E+05
1 .460E + OS
1 .H?.1Eป05
1.58?E*OS
1 . ltปOEปOB
l.?49EปOS
3.13hE*05
8.234E+OS
f* ซrt i
OS
liiU^ yfr*l
8.4h?Fป03
9.385Eป03
1 .S9?F+04
1.7S7Eป04
2.?94Fซ04
6.374Eป04
?.403EปOS
B.44SE*05
1 1 i-l_C UC. M~ป 1 1
OS/DLOAE
f i iu9 / rr* k
\ UWr / i*Vป 1
9.0IS9E + 04
4.58?Eซ04
8.894Fป04
1.13*Eซ05
1 .25HE*05
2.256Eป05
1.0?6Eป06
4.401E+06
I 1 U u ป j n /^ v. v
ON
i wn /rr \
\ ft\J m / \f\f 9
3.710Eป00
8.17SEป00
3.355E*01
7.989Eป01
2.26flEป02
1.838Eป03
2.276E*04
2.134E*05
DN/OLDAE CUM M
1 NO /CC \ 1 * I
t nu . ^ \*\* i < Tป i
3.976Eป01
3.991E*01
1.875Eซ02
5.158E*02
1.244E+03
6.505E+03
9.723Eซ04
1.112E+06
TOTAL MASS CONC= 4.114EปOS
TOTAL SUHF COMC= 1.2?3Eป06
TOTAL NUM CONC= ?.383E+OS
Oi
ro
t
-P-
-------
RM-5.3-1
5.3 Test Series Numbers and References in the FPEIS
This section provides a master listing of Test Series Numbers and refer-
ences for the data in the FPEIS data base. As new test data are added to
the FPEIS, this list will be updated.
-------
Test Series
No.
Report's Author and Name
Testing Equipment
Source
Control Equipment
No. of Runs
Harris, D. B., and D. C.
Drehmel, "Fractional Effi-
ciency of Metal Fume Con-
trol as Determined by
Brink Impactor," EPA/CSL
(1973).
Harris, D. B., and D. C.
Drehmel, "Fractional Effi-
ciency of Metal Fume Con-
trol as Determined by
Brink Impactor," EPA/CSL
(1973).
Harris, D. B., and D. C.
Drehmel, "Fractional Effi-
ciency of Metal Fume Con-
trol as Determined by
Brink Impactor," EPA/CSL
(1973).
Harris, D. B., and D. C.
Drehmel, "Fractional Effi-
ciency of Metal Fume Con-
trol as Determined by
Brink Impactor," EPA/CSL
(1973).
Harris, D. B., and D. C.
Drehmel, "Fractional Effi-
ciency of Metal Fume Con-
trol as Determined by
Brink Impactor," EPA/CSL
(1973).
Statnlck, R. M., "Measurement
of S02, Partlculate, and
Trace Elements In a Copper
Smelter Converter and
Roaster/Reverberatory Gas
Streams," EPA/CSL
Brink Impactor Model B, 5-stage,
Gelman type "A" final filter
flow rate = 2.83 Ipm
Ap = 10"Hg
Brink Impactor Model B, 5-stage,
Celman type "A" final filter
flow rate = 2.83 1pm
Ap 10'llg
Brink Impactor Model B, 5-stage,
Celman type "A" final filter
flow rate = 2.83 1pm
Ap = 10"Hg
Brink Impactor Model B, 5-stage,
Gelman Type "A" final filter
flow rate = 2.83 1pm
Ap 10"Hg
Brink Impactor Model B, 5-ptage,
Gelman type "A" final filter
flow rate = 2.83 1pm
Ap = 10"Hg
Brink Impactor (Model B) at
Inleta, Andersen Sampler
(Mark III) at outlets
Brink flow rate ป 2.83 1pm
Andersen flow rate = 23.8 1pm
Zn Roaster
Wet ESP
Cu Converter
Wet ESP
Zn Sintering
Dry ESP
Pb Sintering
Baghouae (Orion)
Pb Blast Furnace
Baghouse (wool felt)
Cu Roaster and
Reverberatory Furnace
(ASARCO)
Dry ESP (pipe) and
parallel type ESP
-------
Test Series
No.
Report s Author and Namo
Testing; Equipment
Source
Control Equipment
No. of Run s
Statnlck, R. M., "Measurement
of S(K, Particulate, and
Trace Elements in a Copper
Smelter Converter and
Roaster/Reverheratory Gas
Streams," EPA/CSL
Brink Impactor (Model B) at
Inlets, Andersen Sampler
(Mark III) at outlets
Brink Clow rate = 2.83 1pm
Andersen flow rate. ~ 23.8 Ipm
Cu Converter
Plate type ESP
McCain, J. D., and W. B.
Smith, "Lone Star Steel
Steam-Hydro Air Cleaning
System Evaluation," EPA-
650/2-74-028 (197/.)-
Brink Impactor at inlet and
Andersen Sampler at outlet.
Optical particle counter
and diffusion battery.
Method 5 technique.
Open Hearth Furnace
Lone Star Steel Steam-
Hydro Scrubber
38
Cooper, D. W., and D. P.
Andersen, "Dynactor Scrub-
ber Evaluation," GCA Cor-
poration (1976)
Andersen (Mark III) Mt 1pm
Test Aerosol from
Dust Feeder
Dynactor Scrubber
50
10 Harris, D. B., "Tests Per-
formed at Celotex Corpora-
tion, Goldsboro, North
Carol Ina
Pll.it Impactor
Asphalt Roofing
Afterburner
Harris, D. B., and J. A.
Turner, "Particulate and
50.,/SO., Measurement Around
an Anthracite Steam Genera-
tor Baghouse." EPA/CSL (1973)
Brink tmpactor
flov rate = <+.7 1pm
Ap = 10"11R
Pulverized Coal-Fired
Boiler (anthracite)
Pennsylvania Power
and Light Company
Baghouse
bulked weave, glas
fiber bags with a
Teflon finish
12 McKenna, J. D., "Applying
Fabric Filtration to Co.il-
Flred Industrial Boilers:
A Preliminary Pilot Scale
Investigation," Enviro-
Systems and Research, Inc.
(197/4)
Andersen Sampler
Coal-Fired Industrial Nomex
Boiler Kerr Industries, Baghouse
Concord, North Carolina
13 Cowherd, C., et al., "Hazard-
ous Emission Characterization
of Utility Boilers," EPA-650/
2-75-066
Brink tmpactor
Utility Boiler
Cyclone
I
t_n
I
U)
-------
Test Series
No.
Report's Author and Name
Testing Equipment
Source
Control Equipment
No. of Buns
15 Statnick, R. M., and D. C.
Drehmel, "Fine Partlculate
Control Using S0_ Scrubbers,
EPA (1974).
16 Statnick, R. M., and D. C.
Drehmel, "Fine Partlculate
Control Using SOj Scrubbers,"
EPA (1974).
17 Statnick, R. M., and D. C.
Drehmel, "Fine Partlculate
Control Using SO2 Scrubbers,"
EPA (1974).
18 Riggenbach, J. D., E. D.
Johnson and M. K. Hamlln,
"Measurement of Partlculate
Grain Loadings, Particle Size
Distribution, and Sulfur Gas
Concentrations at Hoerner
Waldorf's Pulp and Papermlll
No. 3 Recovery System, Vola.
I, II, and III, Environmental
Science and Engineering, Inc.
19 Shannon, L. J., et al.,
"St. Louis/Union Electric
Refuse Firing Demonstration
Air Pollution Test Report."
20 McCain, J. D., "Evaluation of
Aronetics Two-Phase Jet
Scrubber," EPA-650/2-74-129
21 Bosch, J. C., M. J. Pllat,
and B. F. Hrutfiord, "Size
Distribution of Aerosols
From a Kraft Mill Recovery
Furnace," Tappl 54(11):1871
(1971).
Brink Impactor and Andersen
Sampler. Total Partlculates
using EPA Method 5.
Brink Impactor and Andersen
Sampler. Total Partlcutates
using EPA Method 5.
Brink Impactor and Andersen
Sampler. Total Partlculates
using EPA Method 5.
Brink Impactor
Total Mass by EPA Method 5
Brink Impactor and Andersen
Sampler
Brink Impactor, Andersen
Sampler Method 5, Optical
Particle Counter, Diffu-
sion Battery + CNC
Pilat Impactor
Coal-Fired Power Boiler
(TVA, Shawnee)
Coal-Fired Pover Boiler
(TVA, Shawnee)
No. 6 Fuel Oil Flrnd
Power Boiler (Mystic)
Pulp and Papeml 11 Re-
covery Bller
TCA Scrubber
Venturl Scrubber
Venturl MgO Scrubber
ESP
38
Coal-Fired Utility
Boiler Refuse Firing
Demon s t ra t ion,
St. Louis/Union Electric
Ferro-AHoy Electric Arc
Furnace
Kraft Mill Recovery
Furnace
ESP
Aronetics Two-Phase
Jet Scrubber
ESP
26
41
Test Series Nos. 14 and 47 has missing or invalid data and will be coded when test data are available,
-------
Test Series
No. ____
Report's Author and Name
Testing Equipment
Source
Control Equipment
No. of Runs
22 McGarry, F. J., and C. J.
Gregory, "A Comparison of
the Size Distribution of
Particulates Emitted From
Air, Mechanical, and Steam
Atomized Oil-Fired Burners,"
JAPCA, 22(8):636 (1972).
Andersen Sampler
Air Atomized Otl-Fired
Boiler
23 McGarry, F. J., and C. J.
Gregory, "A Comparison of
the Size Distribution of
Particulates Emitted From
Air, Mechanical, and Steam
Atomized Oil-Fired Burners,
JAPCA, 22(8):636 (1972).
Andersen Sampler
Mechanical Atomized Oil-
Fired Boiler
24 McGarry, F. J., and C. J.
Gregory, "A Comparison of
the Size Distribution of
Particulates Emitted From
Air, Mechanical, and Steam
Atomized Oil-Ftred Burners,
JAPCA, 22(8):636 (1972).
Andersen Sampler
Steam Atomized Oil-Fired
Boiler
ESP
25 Lee, R. E. , Jr., H. L. Crist, IIW Mark 111 Sampler
A. E. Rlley, and K. E. MacLeod,
"Concentration and Size of
Trace Metal Emissions From a
Power Plant, a Steel Plant,
and a Cotton Gin," Env. Sci.
and Tech., 9(7):643 (1975).
Emissions from a Power
Plant
ESP
26
Lee, R. E., Jr., H. L. Crist, UW Mark III Sampler
A. E. Riley, and K. E. MncLeod,
"Concentration and Size of
Trace Metal Emissions From a
Power Plant, a Steel Plant,
and a Cotton Gin," Env. Scl.
and Tech., 9(7):643 (1975).
Emissions from a Steel
Plant
Baghouse
I
(Ji
t_n
-------
Test Series
No.
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
Report's Author and Name Testing Equipment
Lee, R. E., Jr., H. L. Crist, UW Mark III Sampler
A. E. Rlley, and K. E.
MacLeod, "Concentration and
Size of Trace Metal Emissions
from a Power Plant, a Steel
Plant, and a Cotton Gin," Env.
Scl. and Tech. , 9/7)643 (1975).
"St. Louis-Union Electric Refuse Brink and Andersen Impactors
Fuel Project," MRI Project
No. 3821-C(4), January 1975
"St. Louis-Union Electric Refuse
Fuel Project," MRI Project
No. 4033-C, Monthly Report
No. 1
"Test and Evaluation Program
for St. Louis-Union Electric
Refuse Fuel Project," MRI
Project No. 4033-C, Monthly
Report No. 4
"Test and Evaluation Program
for St. Louis-Union Electric
Refuse Fuel Project," MRI
Project No. 4033-C, Monthly
Report No. 11
Toca, F. M., "Lead and Cadmium
Distribution in the Partlcu-
late Effluent from a Coal-
Fired Boiler," Ph.D. Thesis,
University of Iowa, Ames,
Iowa, July 1972
Baladl, E., "Particle Size Dis-
tribution Tests for Beker
Industries Corporation," MRI
Project No. 5-1379-C
Brink and Andersen Impactors
Brink and Andersen Impactors
Brink and Andersen Impactors
Andersen Ambient Sampler
Brinks Impactor
Source
F.mlssionp from a Cotton
Gin
Control Equipment
No. of Runs
Coal-Fired Boiler
Phosphate Rock Calciner
Wet Scrubber
Coal-Fired Utility Boiler ESP
Refuse Firing Demonstra-
tion
Coal-Fired Utility Boiler ESP
Refuse Firing Demonstra-
tion
Coal-Fired Utility Boiler ESP
Refuse Firing Demonstra-
tion
Coal-Fired Utility Boiler ESP
Refuse Firing Demonstra-
tion
ESP
67
12
43
19
Venturl Scrubber
I
(Ji
-------
r Series
No.
Report's Autlior and Name
34 Gooch, J. P., ami .1. D. McCain,
"Partlculate Collection F.f-
ficiency Measurements on a
Wot lilectrostatic Precipi-
tator," EPA-f.50/2-75-031
Tcst'liiR E'|lii|inient
Source
Control Equipment
Brink Andersen Samplers Optical
Particle Counter, Diffusion
Battery nnH CN Counter
Aluniinum Reduction Cells
ESP Preceded l>y Spray
Towers
Ho. of Huns
17
.35 1)railway, K. H. , and U. W.
Oaso, "Fractional F,ฃ f icicncy
of a Utility Boiler BaR-
htMise," EPA-600/2-75-(in-.i
fmpHctor
Coal-Fire.! Roller
Uagliouse
36
McKcnna, J. D., .1. C. Mylock,
and W. O. Mnscomh, "Apply-
ing Fabric Filtration Co
Coal-Fired Industrial Boil-
ers," KPA-650/2-74-058-a
Andetnon tmpactor
Coal-Fired Boiler
Noniey Baglionse
28
McKcnna, J. 0., J. C. Mylock,
and W. O. Lipscomh, "Apply-
ing Fabric Filtration to
Coal-Flreil Industrial Boi 1 -
cis," KPA-6AO/2-7/,-0'i8-a
Andersen Imp.'ictor
Co.il-Firod llol I or
Teflon Ft-lL (Style 1)
Bap, house
30 McKenna, J. D., J. C. Mylock,
and W. 0. Llpscotnb, "Apply-
Ins Fabric Filtration to
Coal-Fired Industrial Boil-
ers," EPA-ft50/2-7A-OS8-a
39 McKenna, J. D. , .1. C. My lock,
and W, O. Lipscomb, "Apply-
ing Fabric Filtration to
Coal-Fired Industrial Boil-
ers," F.PA-C.50/2-7/i-058-a
40 McKenna, J. I). , .1. C. Mylock,
and W. O. Llpsronib, "Apply-
ing Fabric Filtration to
Coal-FlreJ Industrial Boil-
ers," EPA-650/2-74-058-a
Andersen tmpactor
Andersen Impactor
Andersen finpactor
Coal-Fired Boiler
Coal-Fired Boiler
Coal-Fired Boiler
Teฃlon Frit (Style 2)
Core-Tex/Nomcx Bagliouoe
Oralon Raghousc
11
u>
I
-------
Test Series
No.
Report's Author and Na
Testing Equipment
Control Equipment Ho. of Runs
41 McCain, J. D., "Evaluation of
Centrifiel
-------
Test Series
No.
Report's Author and Name
Testing Equipment
Source
Control Equipment No. of Runs
49 Calvert, S., N. J. Jhaveri,
and S. Yung, "Fine Parti-
cle Scrubber Performance
Tests," EPA-650/2-74-093
50 Calvert, S., N. J. Jhaverl,
and S. Yung, "Fine Parti-
cle Scrubber Performance
Tests," EPA-650/2-74-093
UW Mark lit and Andersen
Impactors
UW Mark III and Andersen
Impactors
Potash Dryer
Coal-Fired Boiler
Scrubber
TCA Scrubber
17
51 Calvert, S., N. J. Jhaverl,
and S. Yung, "Fine Parti-
cle Scrubber Performance
Tests," EPA-650/2-74-093
UW Mark III and Andersen
Impactors
Coal-Fired Boiler
Venturl Scrubber
52
Calvert, S., N. J. Jhaverl,
and S. Yung, "Fine Parti-
cle Scrubber Performance
Tests," EPA-650/2-74-093
IM Mark III and Andersen
Impactors
Salt Drver
Wetted Fiber Scrubber
16
53 Calvert, S., N. J. Jhaveri,
and S. Yung, "Fine Parti-
cle Scrubber Performance
Tests," EPA-650/2-74-093
UW Mark III and Andersen
Impactors
Salt Dryer
Impingment Plate
Scrubber
12
54 Calvert, S., N. J. Jhaveri,
and S. Yung, "Fine Parti-
cle Scrubber Performance
Tests," EPA-650/2-74-093
UW Mark III and Andersen
Impactors
Iron Wetting Cupola
Venturi Rod Scrubber
18
-------
TECHNICAL REPORT DATA
(Please read laitnictions on the reverse before compte(ing)
1. REPORT NO.
EPA-600/2-76-173
4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE
Fine Particle Emissions Information System
Reference Manual
3. RECIPIENT'S ACCESSION NO.
5. REPORT DATE
June 1976
6. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE
7. AUTHOR(S)
M.P.Schrag, A.K.Rao, G. S. McMahon, and
G. L.Johnson
8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NO.
9. PERFORMING ORQANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS
Midwest Research Institute
425 Volker Boulevard
Kansas City, Missouri 64110
10. PROGRAM ELEMENT NO.
1AB012; ROAP 21BJV-023
11. CONTRACT/GRANT NO.
68-02-1324, Task 47
12. SPONSORING AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS
EPA, Office of Research and Development
Industrial Environmental Research Laboratory
Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
13. TYPE OF REPORT AND PERIOD COVERED
Reference Manual; 3-5/76
14. SPONSORING AGENCY CODE
EPA-ORD
15. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTEsTask officer for this repOrt is G.L. Johnson, mail drop 63,
919/549-8411, ext 2815.
6. ABSTRACT
The report is a basic reference manual on the Fine Particle Emissions
Information System (FPETJS), a computerized database on primary fine particle
emissions to the atmosphere from stationary sources, designed to assist engineers
and scientists engaged in fine particle control technology development. The FPEIS
will contain source test data including particle size distributions; chemical, physical,
and bioassay testing results performed on particulate samples; design and typical
operating data on particle control systems applied; process descriptions of the sour-
ces; and descriptions of the sampling equipment and techniques employed. The FPEIS
a successor to the MRI Fine Particle Inventory developed in 1971, report describes
in detail the data types contained in the database. It identifies and discusses the
input data requirements and protocol. For reference, it includes a list of available
information request procedures, and describes the general database management
system used to implement the FPEIS.
KEY WORDS AND DOCUMENT ANALYSIS
DESCRIPTORS
Air Pollution
Standards
Dust
Data Storage
Sampling
Size Determination
Environmental
Biology
b.lDENTIFIERS/OPEN ENDED TERMS
Air Pollution Control
Stationary Sources
Reference Manual
Fine Particle Emissions
Information System
FPEIS
c. COSATl Field/Group
13B
11G
09B,05B
14B
06F
8. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT
Unlimited
19. SECURITY CLASS (This Report)
Unclassified
21. NO. OF PAGES
82
20. SECURITY CLASS (Thispage)
Unclassified
22. PRICE
EPA Form 2220-1 (9-73)
------- |