I1 UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 9360.8-10 EPA/540/F-94/046 PB94-963285 AUGUST 1994 I 5 1993 OFFICE OF SOLIDWASTE AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE OSWER Directive 9360.8-10 MEMORANDUM SUBJECT: Interim Guidance for the Determination of Significant and Substantial Harm Facilities For o^l Pollution Act Response Plans FROM: Henry L. Longest II, Director Office of Emergency and Remedial TO: Director, Waste Management Division Regions I, IV, V, VII Director, Emergency and Remedial Response Division Region II Director, Hazardous Waste Management Division Regions III, VI, VIII, IX Director, Hazardous Waste Division Region X Director, Environmental Services Division Regions I, VI, VII This transmits the "Interim Guidance for the Determination of Significant and Substantial Harm Facilities." This Interim Guidance supplements the proposed response plan revisions to 40 CFR Part 112 of February 17, 1993. The purpose of this guidance is to assist Agency personnel in determining whether a facility could reasonably be expected to cause "significant and substantial harm to the environment." The Oil Pollution Act (OPA) of 1990 requires that such facilities must have their facility response plans reviewed and approved by the Agency. The Interim Guidance includes a description of the screening process, forms to document the determination process, and an attachment that explains the justification for each criterion. The Interim Guidance was prepared with the input of Regional On-Scene Coordinators (OSCs), the Office of General Counsel (OGC), the Office of Waste Programs Enforcement (OWPE), the US Coast Guard (USCG) and the Research and Special Programs Administration (RSPA) of the Department of Transportation (DOT), the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), and the Minerals Management Service (MMS). Printed on Recycled Paper ------- The Interim Guidance has three screens for use in . determining if a facility poses a risk of significant and substantial harm to the environment. The screens 'are organized according to the ease of obtaining the required information. To evaluate a particular facility, the three screens should be used sequentially. The first two screens evaluate information from the facility plan. The third screen performs two functions: (1) to allow facilities to be designated as significant and substantial risk based on site-specific characteristics that are not captured under the first two screens, and (2) to re-evaluate those facilities that were designated as significant and substantial risk under the first two screens, but that may have unique locational or facility- specific circumstances that mitigate the potential to cause significant and substantial harm. If a facility is not identified by any of the three screens, the facility would not reasonably be expected to cause significant and substantial harm to the environment. To ensure national consistency in making these determinations, I strongly suggest that the screening process described in the guidance be documented on the attached forms for each facility identified as reasonably expected to 9ause significant and substantial harm. Facilities designated as significant and substantial risk should be notified of their status and be requested to provide to EPA by July 18, 1993 a certification of the implementation of resources described in their response plan. This will enable EPA to evaluate a facility's certification prior to the August 18, 1993, statutory deadline. Approval of a facility's certification will allow it to remain in operation until February 18, 1995, or until its response plan is approved prior to February 18, 1995. If you have questions on the use of the criteria, please contact Bobbie Lively-Diebold at (703) 356-8774. Attachment cc: Regional Removal Managers Cecilia Smith, OWPE Tom Beisswenger, OGC Superfund Document center, (OS-245) ------- |