Energy Research
and Development
Administration
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Division of Biomedical
and Environmental Research
Germantown, Maryland 20767
Office of Research and Development
Office of Energy. Minerals and Industry
Washington, D. C. 20460
EPA-600/7-77-096
August 1977
TROPHIC  STRUCTURE
MODIFICATIONS  BY
PLANKTIVOROUS
FISH IN AQUATIC
MICROCOSMS
Interagency
Energy-Environment
Research and Development
Program Report

-------
                                                         LBL-5978
                 RUNNING HEAD:   Microcosm trophic  structure
            Trophic structure modifications  by  planktivorous  fish
                           in aquatic  microcosms.1
          A. Jassby, J.  Rees, M.  Dudzik,  D.  Levy,  E.  Lapan  and  J.  Harte
                       Energy and Environment Division
                        Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory
                          University of California
                         Berkeley, California  94720
Research supported by the U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration
 and  the  Environmental  Protection Agency D5-E681  through contract #77BCC

-------
                                      -1-
                                  ABSTRACT

     Two of 4 replicate 700-liter aquatic microcosms each were stocked with
2 mosquito fish (Gambusia affinis).   The dominant zooplankter shifted from
the large cladoceran Simooephalus vetulus to the smaller Alona guttata.  The
subsequent release of grazing pressure resulted in a rise in both phytoplankton
and bacteria levels, which in turn were responsible for an increased rotifer
biomass.  Particulate organic carbon was higher and dissolved inorganic nitrogen
was lower in the presence of Gambusia, reflecting a net shift of nutrients
from inorganic to organic form, presumably because of smaller zooplankton
respiratory losses.  Ratios of particulate to dissolved organic carbon and of
phytoplankton carbon to chlorophyll  a_ were unnaturally high in the microcosms
containing fish.  An increase in total nitrogen was deduced for all  4 systems
during the experiment; the increase could be explained by the presence of hetero-
cystous Anabaena sp. and was independent of the presence of fish.

-------
                                     -2-
                                 I INTRODUCTION

     Aquatic microcosms  potentially are valuable tools for dissecting the
 important mechanisms  operating  in natural ecosystesm, as a number of studies
 have suggested  (reviewed by  Cooke, 1971).  Microcosms also may have a central
 role to  play in  predicting the  effects of human-derived disturbances on these
 mechanisms  (Draggan,  1976).  The applicability of microcosms for assessing
 human  impacts on aquatic ecosystems ultimately depends on our ability to demon-
 strate basic analogies between  microcosms and natural water bodies.  Certain size-
 related  differences between  microcosms and natural systems, such as the surface-
 to-volume ratio  of the containing structure, never will be bridged, but the
 usefulness  of microcosms for a  given research problem usually does not require the
 creation of a perfect analog to some naturally-occurring system.  If microcosms
 are to fulfill their  potential,  detailed investigation of both the similarities
 and the  insurmountable discrepancies between laboratory and natural water bodies
 is required.  Only then  can  we  have a basis for accepting or rejecting with
 confidence  a specific prediction derived from research with microcosms.
     Two kinds of experiment can be distinguished in the investigation of
 relationships between synthetic and natural ecosystems.  In the first type of
experiment  the microcosms are allowed to develop without disturbance, the
primary purpose  being to determine whether or not the undisturbed system is
capable of  simulating production cycles or other basic features characteristic
of any naturally-occurring counterpart.  The second type of experiment, consists

-------
                                      ™" ,J™
of an experimental manipulation of the physical, chemical, or biological
characteristics of a microcosm; the response of the microcosm then is com-
pared with the response of natural ecosystems to the same disturbance.  It
is this latter kind of experiment that is a true test of the predictive value
of microcosms.
      The  research  reported  here  summarizes an experiment of the second  kind,
 in  particular,  the addition of planktivorous mosquitofish  (Gambusia affinis)
 to  2 of 4 replicate 700-liter  freshwater microcosms.  A number of studies have
 been published  that document the effects of  increasing or  decreasing  a  plankti-
 vorous  fish  stock  in natural water bodies  (e.g., Hrbacek et al., 1961;  Brooks
 and Dodson,  1965;  Postolkova,  1967; Straskraba, 1967), so  that adequate infor-
 mation  exists to  compare with  the results of a  similar trophic manipulation
 in  aquatic microcosms.  Detailed biological and chemical monitoring of  the
 microcosms in this study permits such a comparison to be made, as well  as
 providing new information on the results of manipulating a planktivorous
 trophic level.

-------
                                   METHODS

      Each of the 4 700-liter systems  (designated A,B,C,D) consisted of a
 fiberglass cylinder, 60.9 cm in radius,  filled  to a depth of 60.1 cm with
 denrineralized water.  The water was enriched with a modification of a common
 freshwater algal growth medium (Woods  Hole MBL; Nichols, 1973) and inoculated
 with a 3.5 liter water sample collected  from Lake Anza, a small eutrophic lake
 in the Til den Park area of Berkeley,  Ca.  The enrichment levels of C, N, and
 P were 0.21  mmol liter"1 NaHC03, 1.7  ymol liter"1 NaN03, and 3.4 ymol liter"1
 Na2HP04 • 7H20, respectively, a situation conducive to eventual N limitation
 of algal  growth.  The systems were maintained in a temperature controlled room
 at 19±1  °C, illuminated by a bank of 8  4-ft high-output fluorescent lights
 on a 12:12 light:dark cycle, and aerated at a rate of 1.2 liter min" .  On day
 35 (enrichment was on Day 0), 2 mosquitofish (Gambusia affinis] of length 2.5
 cm were added to each of A and C.
     As demonstrated in  other experiments (Jassby et^ a]_., 1977), the initiation
conditions described above  give  rise to a phytoplankton bloom that is terminated
by zooplankton  grazing within 2  months, after which zooplankton grazing and
phytoplankton growth  remain  loosely balanced for some time.  Regular monitoring
of each parameter  for this  experiment  began sometime between Day 48 and Day 65,
depending on the parameter,  after the  initial bloom had terminated and the
Gambusia were given  the  opportunity to adjust to their new surroundings.  The
following parameters  were measured twice per week:  temperature, Og, pH, inor-
ganic carbon (1C), organic  carbon (OC), NH^, N03 + N02, chlorophyll a_ (Chi a_),
phytoplankton species and numbers, zooplankton  species and numbers, and bacteria

-------
                                     -5-
numbers.  Except for phytoplankton and zoonlankton, all measurements were
duplicated.  Bacteria numbers were obtained with the Standard Plate Count
method  (APHA, 1971), and OC was fractionated into dissolved (DOC) and parti-
culate organic carbon (POC) by measurement before and after filtration through a
precombusted Whatman 6F/C filter.  Remaining analyses and the nutrient composi-
tion of the medium were as described elsewhere (Jassby et^ al_., 1977).  Monitoring
was terminated on Day 100, except for bacterial numbers, which were followed
until Day 117.

-------
                                     -6-
                                    RESULTS
      A detailed  presentation  of  the temporal patterns that can be observed
 in  these  microcosms  appears elsewhere  in conjunction with a different set of
 experiments;  the results of this trophic manipulation experiment thus are
 reported  in  summary  form only.
      The  temperature of the microcosms remained at 18±1 °C or approxi-
 mately 1  °C  below room temperature,  presumably because of evaporative cooling.
                                                              i
 02  concentrations fluctuated  between 0.28 and 0.31 mmol liter  .  Aeration
 apparently was sufficient  to  prevent any significant biological modification
 of  Op levels  and most of the  fluctuations can be ascribed to temperature varia-
 tions in  the  microcosms.   The pH values persisted at approximately pH 7.
      The  presence of Gambusia led  to a significant decrease in the average
 occurence of  the large cladoceran Simoaephalus vetulus (Table 1), the adult
 female form of which reaches  lengths of 2 to 3 mm.  The copepod Cyclops
 vernalis  (adult  females approximately  1.5 mm in length) also decreased in
 concentration, but this decrease was much less significant.  The mean levels
 of  the small  cladoceran Alona gu.tta.ta  (adult females approximately 0.5 mm in
 length) were  similar both  in  the presence and absence of Gambusia.  Among the
 5 rotifers dwelling  in the microcosms, only Leeane sp. responded significantly
 to  the  introduction  of Gambusia, in  the form of an order-of-magnitude increase
 in  individual numbers.  Changes  in Anuraeopsis sp., Keratella ooohleavis,
Keratella quadrata,  and Triohotria sp. were not significant.
     Although Chi  a_  concentrations were unaffected by Gambusia, total phyto-
plankton volume  exhibited  a large  increase in the  systems containing Gambusia
and ratios of phytoplankton carbon to  Chi a_also were higher  (Table 1).  A

-------
                                     -7-
total of 31 phytoplankton species were recorded but no obvious relationship of
community composition to the presence of Gambus-ia could be detected.  The
phytoplankton communities were dominated by 2 forms of Synedra radians, which
was the dominant or second most dominant alga (by volume) in 79% of the 84
samples.  Synedva ulna and a heterocyst-containing Andbaena sp. were next in
importance, being most or second most dominant in 29% and 20% of the samples,
respectively.  In the 84 samples, the dominant and second most dominant algae
accounted for an average of 86% of the community volume.  A light periphytic
growth on the sides of each container appeared by the end of the experiment
and consisted primarily, of Mougeotia sp.
     Bacteria plate counts increased markedly in the systems containing
Gambusia (Table 1).  Tony tarsus larvae were observed first on the container
sides of system C and apparently were present in the initial inoculum for C.
The Tony-tarsus spread via the adult flying stage to the remaining 3 systems
(first to B and D, then to A) where larval populations also become established.
The Gambusia in A and C were observed to feed on the larvae when they detached
from the container sides and swam to the surface in preparation for their
emergence as adults.  The presence of Gambusia, however, did not alter signi-
ficantly the occurrence of the midges within the water column (Table 1).
     Mean levels of 1C and DOC (Table 2) were unaffected by the presence of
fish.  On the other hand, stocking of systems A and C with  Gambusia led to
significant increases in POC and the ratio of POC to DOC, and to significant
decreases in NH4 and N03 + N02-  It should be noted that POC values do not
include the carbon content of Gambusia.  Accordingly, the results of Table  1

-------
                                     -8-
indicate a shift of nitrogen from dissolved inorganic to particulate organic
form upon the addition of a higher planktivorous trophic level.  An increase
in total N over the initial level of 1.7 ymol liter"  NO., also can be deduced
from the results for each treatment.
     The Gambusia individuals in A and C, although starved for 48 h before
addition, remained active and with normal coloration throughout the experiment.
No quantitative observations on their size change were collected,  but qualitative
observation definitely suggested a size increase.

-------
                                     -9-
                                 DISCUSSION
B-Lological effects.  The average levels of the chemical parameters demonstrated
good replicability within treatments (Table 2); this was not the case for the
biological parameters, especially the zooplankton (Table 1).  Part of the
variability within pairs may be ascribable to the variable Tanytarsus coloniza-
tion.  However, other experiments, in which variability remained even when
Tanytapsus larvae were stocked simultaneously in all systems, suggested that
poor replication may result from random deviations of protozoa numbers in the
initial inoculum (Jassby ejt al_., 1977).  Whatever the case, the poor replication
entails that many of the potential treatment effects on zooplankton levels
may not be extractable from the data.
     Nonetheless, certain biological responses to the presence of a planktivore
are" evident (Table 1), and are consistent with the following explanation:
the Gambusia fed on Simocephalus and reduced the average concentration almost
10-fold;  Cyclops vernalis, being of smaller size, was fed on to a lesser extent,
while the smallest crustacean, Alona guttata, appeared to have been ignored by
the mosquitofish.  The dominant zooplankters thus shifted from large cladocerans
and cyclopoid copepods to smaller cladocerans.  Similar transitions have been
observed with heavy stocking of cyprinids in natural ponds (e.g., Hrbacek et al.,
1961) and the introduction of the alewife Alosa  aestivalis into Crystal Lake,
Connecticut (Brooks and Dodson, 1965); and a transition in the opposite direc-
tion was observed when fish were excluded from the littoral areas of small
natural lakes (e.g., PoStolkova, 1967).
     Despite the fact that they are larger than Simocephalus individuals,
the midge largae did not show a significant response to the presence of

-------
                                     -10-
 Gambusia.   Most of the  midge  larvae were on  the container sides where they

 remained free from from Gambusia  predation.  The larval population in the

 water column constantly was losing individuals that emerged from the water

 surface and gaining individuals that  detached from the container sides.  The

 resulting  high turnover rate  for  larvae in the water column probably was

 sufficient to disguise  the effects of Gambusia predation.

      Because simocephalus  is  capable  of such high filtering rates (reported

 up to 90 ml ind"  d"  ;  Sushtchenia, 1958), the decrease of approximately 6 ind

 liter   in mean simoeephalus  concentrations  without a corresponding increase in

 other crustaceans  implies  that much of the grazing pressure on phytoplankton and

 bacteria was eliminated with  the  introduction of Gambusia.  Indeed, the bacteria

 plate counts increased  by  a factor of 3, and the phytoplankton community volume

 by a  factor of 5.   According  to one trophic  state classification based upon

 phytoplankton volume  (Vollenweider, 1968), it may be said that the presence of

 Gambusia resulted  in  a  shift  from an  oligotrophic to a mesotrophic system.  A

 change in  mean phytoplankton  cell size was not observed in this study, although

 smaller sizes in the  presence of  planktivores have been reported in some of the

 studies  referred to earlier.

      In  view of the large  increase in mean phytoplankton levels where Gambusia

 were  present,  the  lack  of  any difference in  Chi a_ values may  appear somewhat

 puzzling.   However, these  values  were not corrected for phaeopignment  inter-

 ference  and thus represent the fluorescence  of grazed phytoplankton and other

 forms  of detritus  (Currie, 1962), as  well as of living algae.  Accordingly,

 the proportion  of  the Chi  a_ attributable to  living phytoplankton  is least  in

 B and  D, where  more grazing activity  presumably is taking, place.   For  similar
                                                                     /
 reasons, the  ratio  of phytoplankton carbon to Chi a_ appears to be  lower  in the
                                                                     \
absence of  Gambusia.

-------
                                    -11-
     The increased levels of bacteria and phytoplankton imply a larger food
source for rotifers, competition with crustaceans being ameliorated somewhat
by the smaller Sirhocephalus populations.  Only the numbers of Leoane sp. (Table
1) definitely reflect the increased food supp_ly, but the mean value«.=of the rotifer
community volume increased from 0.013 mm3 liter"1 in  B,C  to 0.062 mm3 liter"1
in  A,C.   These results concur with the general observation from the above
studies with natural systems that rotifers increase with increasing fish stock.
Chemical effects.  Because of the aeration, biological activity in this experi-
ment  was not sufficient to alter the 1C levels after the initial  bloom, either in
the presence or absence of the mosquitofish (Table 2).  DOC also remained
unchanged, suggesting that the dissolved compounds produced were of a labile
nature that were processed quickly by bacteria before differences  could arise
between treatments.  The increase in POC in A,C demonstrates that  the loss
of crustaceans in the presence of Gambusia was more than compensated for by
increases in the rotifer, phytoplankton, and bacterial biomasses.   This is to
be expected, because the lowered grazing rates imply that a smaller amount of
of primary production will be lost to zooplankton respiration and  excretion.
     The POC:DOC ratio of 0.1 in  B,D is more characteristic of natural systems
that the value of 0.3 observed in  A,C  (Wetzel and Rich, 1973).  This probably
is a reflection of the fact that the concentration of Gambusia in A and C was
                  •3       1
approximately 5 mm  liter   wet weight, higher than that for phytoplankton
and a level that would arise only rarely in a natural mesotrophic system.
Similarly, the C:Chl a_ ratio of 21 observed in B, D is much more likely to
be encountered in natural systems (Paerl et_ al_., 1976)  than the value  for  A,C
of over 100.  The abnormal POC:DOC and  C:Chl  a_ ratios  in A,C underline the

-------
                                     -12-
 fact that the effects  attributable  to  the  presence of mosquitofish can be
 accepted only in  a  qualitative  manner;  it  is not  possible to stock laboratory
 microcosms with  realistic  concentrations of planktovorous fish and obtain
 effects  that are  acceptable  quantitatively.
      Lower levels of NH4 and NO.,  +  N02  in  A, C  simply reflect, the fact that
 POC (and, presumably,   particulate  organic nitrogen) increased when Gcaribusia was
 stocked  in the microcosms.   However, a  marked increased over the  initial N
 levels of 1.7 ymol  liter"  took place  in all 4  systems.  If we assume a C:N
 molar ratio of 12 for the  POC (typical  of  autochthonous detritus; Wetzel, 1975),
 then the increase in mean  total N ( =  NH.  + NO., + N02 + [POC/12]  - 1.7) was about
 7  ymol liter" in both treatments.  As  mentioned  previously a heterocystous
 Andbaena was the  third most  dominant alga  in the  microcosms and the possibility
 exists that the  additional N was  provided  by algal fixation.  An  average fixation
 rate of  only 0.004  ymol  liter"  h~  is  required to provide an additional 10 ymol
 liter"   N by Day  100.   Such  rates are well within the range observed in nature
 (label 11-3;  Wetzel,  1975).   The  fact  that the  N  increase was identical in
 both  systems  is consistent with this explanation; Andbaena filaments, by virtue
 of  their size and mucilaginous  sheaths, are not very susceptible  to zooplankton
 grazing  and  so their population levels  probably are unaffected by the presence
 of  a  planktivorous  fish.   Indeed, no significant  differences were found in  the
Andbaena concentrations  between treatments.
 Conclusion.   In sum, we  conclude  that  the  response of the microcosms to stocking
of a  planktivorous  trophic level  closely resembled the  response of natural
systems  to the same manipulation.   As  has  been  observed in naturally-occurring

-------
                                    -13-
water bodies, introduction of planktivorous fish led to (i) a shift in the
dominant zooplankters from large to small cladocerans; (ii) an increase in phyto-
plankton resulting from lowered grazing pressure; and (iii) a higher rotifer
biomass in response to the increased phytoplankton.  Additional responses
observed in this study included (iv) an increase in bacteria, presumably for
the same reason as the phytoplankton increase;  (v) higher POC levels reflecting
smaller losses to zooplankton respiration and excretion; (vi) lower inorganic
N levels as the fish  induce a net transition from inorganic to organic form; and
(vii) increased ratios of POC.-DOC and phyto C:Chl a_.  The agreement with
observations  from natural systems and the ability to suggest additional features
of the response to trophic structure manipulation clearly establishes the use-
fulness of these microcosms for research on trophic structure.

-------
                                      -14-
                             REFERENCES

 APHA.  1971.   Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater.
 American  Public  Health Association.

 Brooks, J,L.,  and  S.I. Dodson. 1965. Predation, body size, and composition
 of plankton.   Science 150;28-35.

 Cooke, G.D.  1971.   Aquatic  laboratory microsystems and communities, p. 48-85.
 IQ J.  Cairns  (ed.), The  structure and function of freshwater microbial
 communities.   Virginia Polytechnic  Institute and State University.
 Currie, R.I.  1962.   Pigments in zooplankton faeces.  Nature 193:956-957.
 Draggan,  S.  1976,   The role of microcosms in ecological research.  Intern.
 J.  Environmental Studies  10:1-2.

 Hrbac'ek,  J., M.  Dvotakova,  V. Korinek, and L. Prochazkova. 1961.  Demon-
 stration  of the  effect of the fish  stock on the species composition of
 zooplankton and the intenstiy of metabolism of the whole plankton associa-
 tion.  Verh.  Int.  Ver. Limnol. 1_4:192-195.

 Jassby, A., M. Dudzik, J. Rees, E.  Lapan, D. Levy, and J. Harte, 1977.
 Production cycles  in aquatic microcosms.  Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory
 report LBL-5965. 52 p.
 Nichols,  H.W.  1973.  Growth  media-freshwater, p.7-24.  I_n_J.R.  Stein  (ed.),
 Phycological methods. Cambridge University.

 Paerl, H.W., M.M. Tilzer, and C.R.  Goldman. 1976. Chlorophyll  a_ versus
adenosine triphosphate as algal biomass indicators in  lakes.  J.  Phycol.
12:242-246.

-------
                                -15-
         y
Postolkova, M. 1967.  Comparison of the zooplankton amount and primary
production of the fenced and unfenced littoral regions of Smyslov Pond.
Rozpravy Ceskosl. Akad. Ved, Rada Matern. Pn'r. Ved, 77:63-79.

Straskraba, M. 1967. Quantitative study on the littoral zooplankton of the
Poltruba Backwater with an attempt to disclose the effect on fish.  Roz-
pravy Ceskosl. Akad.Ved, Rada Matem. Prfr. Ved, 77:7-34.
Vollenwider,  R.A. 1968.  Scientific fundamentals of the eutrophication of
lakes and flowing waters, with particualr reference to nitrogen and phos-
phorous as factors  in eutrophication.  OECD,  Rep. DAS/CSI/68.27.  192 p.
Wetzel, R.G.  1975.  Limnology. Saunders.
Wetzel, R.6., and P.M. Rich. 1973.  Carbon in freshwater systems, p.241-263.
Jn^ 6.M. Woodwell and E.V. Pecan  (eds.), Carbon and the biosphere.  Proc.
Brookhaven Symp. in Biol. 24.

-------
                                     -16-
                                TABLE HEADINGS
Table 1.  Biological parameters monitored in the microcosms.  N is the number
          of times measurements of the parameters were taken in each system. Chi a_
          and  bacteria counts were duplicated.  The entry for each pair of
          systems (A,C  and B,D) is the mean ± standard error of the average
          value of the parameter for each member of the pair.  The value of
          t is the t-statistic for the null hypothesis that the 2 pairs of
          systems (A,C with Gcaribusia and B,D  without Gambusia} have equal
          means.

Table 2.  Chemical parameters monitored in the microcosms.  N is the number
          of times duplicate measurements of the parameter were taken in each
          system.  The entry for each pair of systems (A,C  and B,D) is the
          mean ± standard error of the average value of the parameter for each
          member of the pair.  The value of t is the t-statistic for the null
          hypothesis that the 2 pairs of systems (A,C with Gambusia and B,D
          without Gambusia} have equal means.

-------
Parameter
(units)
bacteria
(104 ml"1)
Phytoplankton
3 1
(mm liter )
Chi a.
(yg liter" )
phyto CrChl a1
Rotifera
(ind liter'1)
Ama>aeopsis sp.
Keratella cochleayis
Keratella quadrata
Lecane sp.
Triehotria sp.
Cladocera
(ind liter"1)
Alona guttata
Simoaevhalus vetulus
N
17
14
11
11

14
14
14
14
14

14
14
Mean ± Standard
A,C
16±4
3,4±0.1
5.4 ±2.0
113±27

0.12 ±0.00
4.5±4.4
130 ±120
42 ±3
23 ±31

20 ±4
0.80±0.71
Error
B,D
5.0±1.4
0.69 ±0.37
5.1 ±0.7
21 ± 7

0.59 ±0.83
66 ±93
6.2±6.7
6.4±6.4
0.60 ±0.85

15±7
6.8±1.0
t
3.90*
10.05**
0.20
4.68*

1.00
0.94
1.48
7.15**
1.00

0.82
6.96**
 Copepoda
 (ind liter"1)
    Cyclops ve-malis       14    1.7±0.1       7.2±3.3          2.39
 Diptera
 (ind liter"1)
    Tanytarsus  sp.         14    0.59±0.83     1.8±0.8          1-41

 * Null hypothesis  rejected at  the  80%  level of significance
** Null hypothesis  rejected at  the  90%  level of significance
   Assuming that phyto C is 10% of wet weight
                                 Table 1

-------
                               -18-
Parameter N Mean ± Standard error
(units) A,C B,D
1C , 12 0.21 ±0.04 0.23 ±0.04
(mmol 1 i ter~ )
DOC _, 11 0.32 ±0.01 0.31+0.01
(mmol liter" )
POC n 11 0.76 ±0.011 0.022 ±0.001
t
0.57
1.34
6.70**
  (mmol liter" )
  POCrDOC           11    0.29 ±0.01      0.090 ±0.003     19.61***
  NH.               14    2.2±0.2        5.6±1.5          3.21*
    i         -i
  (ymol liter)
  NO, + N00         12    0.50±0.05      0.90 + 0.14        3.82*
             -1
  (ymol liter" )
  * Null hypothesis rejected at the 80% level of significance
 ** Null hypothesis rejected at the 90% level of significance
*** Null hypothesis rejected at the 95% level of significance
                              Table 2

-------