EPA-660/2-74-008
February 1974
                       Environmental Protection Technology Series
   Color Removal  And Sludge Dispos
    Process  for Kraft Mill Effluents
                                 Office of Research and Development
                                 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
                                 Washington, D.C. 20460

-------
            RESEARCH REPORTING SERIES
Research reports of the  Office  of  Research  and
Monitoring,  Environmental Protection Agency, have
been grouped into five series.  These  five  broad
categories  were established to facilitate further
development  and  application   of   environmental
technology.   Elimination  of traditional grouping
was  consciously  planned  to  foster   technology
transfer   and  a  maximum  interface  in  related
fields.  The five series are:

   1.  Environmental Health Effects Research
   2.  Environmental Protection Technology
   3.  Ecological Research
   4.  Environmental Monitoring
   5.  Socioeconomic Environmental studies
                              ' , '^v • •
This report has been assigned to the ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION   TECHNOLOGY   series.    This   series
describes   research   performed  to  develop  and
demonstrate   instrumentation,    equipment    and
methodology  to  repair  or  prevent environmental
degradation from point and  -non-point  sources  of
pollution.  This work provides the new or improved
technology  required for the control and treatment
of pollution sources to meet environmental quality
standards.

-------
                                                        EPA-660/2-74-008
                                                        February 1974
                       COLOR REMOVAL AND SLUDGE

                           DISPOSAL PROCESS

                                 FOR

                         KRAFT MILL EFFLUENTS
                                  By

                         Edgar L. Sprtrfll,  Jr.
                           Project 12040  DRY
                        Program Element 1B2037
                            Project Officer

                          Dr.  Richard L. HW
                 Office  of Research and Development
                   Environmental Protection Agency
                          1600 Patterson St.
                         Dallas, Texas  75201
                             Prepared for

                 OFFICE  OF RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
                U.S.  ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
                       MASJUHGION. D.C. 20460
For «al» by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 90402 - Price $1.85

-------
              EPA Review Notice
This report has been reviewed by the Office of
Research and Monitoring, EPA, and approved for
publication.  Approval does not signify that the
contents necessarily reflect the views and policies
of the Environmental Protection Agency, nor does
mention of trade names or commercial products
constitute endorsement or recommendation for use.

-------
                                 ABSTRACT
A treatment plant, removing color by lime addition and recovering
sludges, has been treating over 80% of the effluent of an unbleached
kraft mill for one year.  Using up to 1,100 mg/1 of CaO, with normal
mill fiber loss as a precipitation aid, average color reduction was
80% for all-kraft effluent.  At upper range of lime dosage, when
residual dissolved Ca was above 400 mg/1 as CaO, color removal  was
85 - 93%.  When mill production included 33 - 40% NSSC hardwood pulp,
color reduction averaged only 65%.

About 12% BODc reduction was observed, and average TOC reduction was
nearly 40%.  The chief negative factor is need for emergency protection
against alkaline impact on secondary treatment and receiving stream.

Following centrifuge dewatering, sludge incineration has had minimal
impact on kiln operation; there were some adverse effects on lime
quality.  Lime recovery was 93%.  Mill kiln capacity must be increased
about 25%.

Primary clarification and sludge disposal are included in the process.
Operating costs, exclusive of capital factors, are estimated at $0.50-
$0.80 per ton of paper, or 5.5
-------
                                TABLE OF CONTENTS

SECTION                                                    PAGE
   I       CONCLUSIONS                                        1
  II       RECOMMENDATIONS                                    3
 III       INTRODUCTION                                       4
  IV       DEVELOPING A PLANT DESIGN                         10
   V       EQUIPMENT PERFORMANCE AND CHANGES                 50
  VI       PROCESS PERFORMANCE                               65
 VII       ECONOMIC CONSIDERATIONS                           79
VIII       ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS                                  82
  IX       REFERENCES                                        83
   X       GLOSSARY                                          85
  XI       APPENDICES                                        87

-------
                              FIGURES

                                                                  PAGE
 1       PROCESS FLOW SHEET - EARLY VERSION                           9
 2      EFFECT OF TIME AND LIME DOSAGE ON COLOR (KRAFT)              11
 3      EFFECT OF TIME AND LIME DOSAGE ON COLOR (WITH NSSC)         12
 4      EFFECT OF LIME DOSAGE ON SETTLING RATE                      16
 5      EFFECT OF REACTION TIME ON SETTLING RATE                    17
 6      UNIT AREA FOR SLUDGE THICKENING                             21
 7      EFFECT OF CARBONATION pH ON DISSOLVED CALCIUM               26
 8      EFFECT OF COLOR SLUDGE DEWATERING                           29
 9      FLOW SHEET WITH CENTRIFUGE                                  36
10      FLOW SHEET FOR PLANT DESIGN                                 40
11      GAS DIFFUSER                                                44
12      EMERGENCY FLOW SCHEME FOR EFFLUENT                          49
13      CENTRIFUGE FLOW MODIFICATION                                61
14      FLOW SAMPLER FOR pH PROBE                                   64
15      DAILY DATA WORK SHEET (SAMPLE)                              68
16      SOLUTION CaO VERSUS COLOR REMOVAL (KRAFT)                   70
17      SOLUTION CaO VERSUS COLOR REMOVAL (WITH NSSC)               71
18      SOLUTION CaO VERSUS TOC REDUCTION (KRAFT)                   73
19      SOLUTION CaO VERSUS TOC REDUCTION (WITH NSSC)               74
20      COLOR - TOC RELATIONSHIP (KRAFT)                            75
21      COLOR - TOC RELATIONSHIP (WITH NSSC)                        76
                                VT

-------
                                 TABLES
No.                                                               Page
 1      Effect of Variables on Color Removal  (with NSSC)             13
 2      Effect of Added Black and Brown Liquor on Color Removal
          Efficiency                                                13
 3      Pilot Plant Color Removal Data                              14
 4      Effect of Time and Lime Dosage on Calcium Precipitation      15
 5      Effect of Time and Lime Dosage on Calcium Precipitation
          (with Added Liquor)                                       15
 6      Five-Variable Statistical Study of Process                  18
 7      Estimated Amount of Color Sludge                            19
 8      Color Sludge Thickening Data                                20
 9      Effect on Filtering Rate of Ratio of Mud Solids to
          Sludge Solids                                             22
10      Effect of Sludge Concentration of Filtration Rate           23
11      Average Filtration Rates                                    24
12      Efficiency of Pilot Plant Carbonate Clarifier               27
13      Efficiency of Color Removal from Pulping Area Effluent      27
14      Pilot Centrifuge Data, Factory                              30
15      Pilot Centrifuge Data, Factory                              31
16      Pilot Centrifuge Data, Mill Laboratory                      32
17      Pilot Centrifuge Data, Mill Laboratory                      33
18      Pilot Centrifuge Data, Mill Laboratory                      34
19      Treatment System Up-Time                                    67
20      Color Reduction Before and After Lime Recovery              69
                                vii

-------
                              SECTION I

                             CONCLUSIONS


A treatment process, employing lime in concentrations below the solubil-
ity limits of calcium hydroxide in water, has been developed for removal
of colored matter from unbleached kraft mill effluent and for recovery
of the lime and precipitated organic substances.  A full-scale plant em-
bodying this process has been designed and built at Continental Can Com-
pany's Hodge, Louisiana, mill and operated since August 18, 1971.  Oper-
ation through August 31, 1972 is described in this report, and the fol-
lowing conclusions are drawn:

     1.  Effectiveness of the Process

         - Addition of lime to combined, unclarified kraft pulp and
           paper mill effluent, at rates below 1100 mg/1 as CaO, can
           produce average color reduction of 80% on a continuous,
           mi 11-scale basis.

         - If system reliability can insure uninterrupted lime feed
           at rates which maintain a residual dissolved calcium con-
           centration of at least 400 mg/1, color reduction will ex-
           ceed 85% and range to above 90%.  The required lime addition
           will normally be about 1000 mg/1 as CaO.  (High sodium alka-
           linity may reduce this performance.)

         - A reduction of about 12% in 6005 is realized, and removal
           of solid-phase organic material is virtually 100%.  How-
           ever, BODij may actually increase if lime feed is inadequate
           or intermittent.

         - Where NSSC materials contribute more than half of the color,
           efficiency of color removal may be reduced 15% or more.

         - Sedimentation of calcium carbonate after carbonation is
           adversely affected by incomplete removal of colored sub-
           stances and is influenced by other factors not fully eluci-
           dated in this study.

         - Precipitated color bodies, together with the usual  "primary
           treatment" sludge, can be disposed of by incineration in a
           lime kiln, coincidentally with recovery of the lime utilized
           in the treatment.

     2.  Design and Performance of Equipment

         - Basic concepts and criteria used for design of most equip-
           ment for the project have proved valid.


                                   1

-------
    - Kiln gas flow rate provided for carbonation must reflect
      minimum C02 concentration which is likely to occur, and
      must include the demand imposed by sodium alkalinity of the
      effluent.

    - Rake torque imposed by the carbonation clarifier is below
      expectations based on other calcium carbonate slurries.  A
      greater area and retention time allowance for this clarifier
      may be justified.

    - Centrifuge dewatering of sludges requires careful  choice and
      application of equipment, but the centrifuge appears to re-
      present the method of choice for this operation.

3.  Effects on Kraft Mill Operations

    - For kraft mills treating 10,000 - 15,000 gallons of effluent
      per ton of pulp, lime kiln requirements are increased about
      25%.

    - Where filler clays and similar insolubles are avoided, lime
      contamination will remain within tolerable limits.

    - Requirements for carbon dioxide supplied by lime kiln stack
      gas impose a constraint upon the scheduling of interruptions
      in kiln operation, as do lime supply and sludge disposal.

    - Holding ponds or other emergency alternatives are required
      to prevent alkali damage to secondary treatment operations
      (or to receiving stream) in case of system failure at the
      carbonation stage.

4.  Operating Costs

    - To treat 13 million gallons of effluent per day from a 1,500
      tons-per-day, integrated kraft pulp and paper mill, operating
      costs will be approximately $0.50 per ton of paper (assumed
      fuel cost, 48£ per million Btu).  Costs of depreciation, in-
      surance and taxes are not included.

    - The functions of conventional primary clarification and final
      sludge disposal are provided within the stated costs of the
      process.

-------
                              SECTION II

                            RECOMMENDATIONS
There is evidence that, after color precipitation with lime, the final
effluent may extract color from natural organic materials during and
after secondary treatment.  This phenomenon was outside the scope of
this project, but the mechanisms and magnitude of such color effects
on receiving streams should be explored.

The effect of lime kiln stack gas on color, total organic carbon and
8005 of effluent needs further study.

The effects of the organic components of color sludge on the heat re-
quirements for calcining have not been adequately measured.  Study might
properly include direct establishment of accurate heat and material bal-
ances, as well as examination of pyrolysis products in the exit gases
from the kiln.

It should be ascertained whether moderate further increases in lime dose
have significant effects on reduction of TOC and 8005.

-------
                              SECTION III

                             INTRODUCTION
The Kraft Effluent Color Problem

The spent liquors from wood pulping by alkaline methods,  such  as  the
kraft process, are very dark colored; indeed they are commonly referred
to as "black liquor."  Further delignification procedures involving al-
kalis, such as caustic extraction steps in bleaching, also yield  highly
colored solutions.  The kraft process characteristically  provides for
separation, concentration and combustion of spent liquor  to recover soda
chemicals and heat value; however, existing technology does not prevent
some loss, and effluents from kraft mills are distinctly  colored.

Discharge of substantial ratios of untreated mill effluent into streams
has long been recognized as dangerous to fish and other aquatic life.
The adverse effects are largely alleviated by adaptations of the  con-
ventional processes of "primary" and "secondary" waste treatment.  Al-
though such treatment may be very effective in removal of suspended
solids and reduction of BOD, these procedures are almost  totally  in-
effective in reducing color of the effluent.

Color contributed by paper mill effluent is at least esthetically un-
desirable, and it may make the stream unsuitable for such uses as muni-
cipal water supply or certain recreational purposes.  Residual organic
substances, refractory to bio-oxidation, may represent a  significant COD
(or TOC) value.
Previous Work

In 1952, an investigation and review revealed that much work had been
done to develop means for reducing color of pulping effluents, but that
no practical methodology had resulted, and little technical  literature
on the subject existed.  (!)  It was found that color could be substan-
tially removed from solution by a number of agents, including alum, min-
eral acids, ferric sulfate, lime, barium aluminum silicate, activated
silica, and various heavy metal salts, and by combinations of these
agents.  However, the costs of such treatments, applied to the great
volume of water discharged by a pulp and paper mill, were very high,
and disposition of the residues presented further problems for which
there were no attractive solutions.

This review marked the beginning of a strong and  sustained effort,
supported by the paper industry, to develop technology for elimination
or reduction of color from chemical pulping and bleaching effluents.
Efforts were largely directed toward use of lime, both because that
material is low in cost and because it offers possibilities for recovery

-------
and re-use in the pulping operation.  The ensuing program produced a
number of reports showing that lime could yield a good degree of color
reduction and presenting several attempts at practical recovery of the
lime.  (2,3,4,5,6,7)

The combination of the lime treatment research program of the N.C.S.I.
(National Council for Stream Improvement, more recently changed to
N.C.A.S.I., adding "Air and . .  ."), is a patented process fully re-
ported in their Technical Bulletin No. 157.  (8,9)  That process was
specifically designed for bleachinq system effluents (especially efflu-
ent from caustic extraction stages).  The method involves use of very
large amounts of lime (typically about 20,000 parts, w/w, per million
parts of effluent), and the colored substances are said to be deposited
on suspended, solid-phase calcium hydroxide.  The color laden calcium
hydroxide is sedimented in a clarifier and withdrawn as a heavy sludge.
The treated effluent is carbonated to remove soluble lime, converting
it to calcium carbonate, which is then removed and mixed with the cal-
cium hydroxide sludge.  The mixed sludge is filtered and is then used
to causticize sodium carbonate in the kraft mill liquor-processing sys-
tem.  Color bodies are dissolved into the kraft cooking liquor and ul-
timately arrive with the spent liquor at the recovery furnace, while
the lime is conventionally reburned and re-used.

The N.C.S.I. scheme, called "The Massive Lime Process" for evident rea-
sons, has the advantages of providing a high degree of color removal,
a large reduction in COD, a substantial reduction in 6005 (at least from
bleachery wastes), and a means for disposing of the separated color bod-
ies and recovering the lime.  Its chief disadvantages are:  the very
large amount of lime required and the substantial changes in operation
of the kraft causticizing system.  Since no more lime can be employed
than is needed for causticizing, the volume of water which can be treated
is limited to 3,000 to 5,000 gallons per ton of kraft pulp made.

The Massive Lime Process has been studied under EPA grant 12040 DYD, for
which a comprehensive report has been prepared.  (10)

Considerable work has been done by at least one investigator to develop
a color removal process based on commercial alum.  (11)  Although good
color reduction has been reported and a sludge recovery procedure has
been outlined, economic feasibility does not appear to have been devel-
oped.

The use of activated carbon, especially as a "polishing" treatment to
remove the last traces of color (12,13) has been studied, and the possi-
bilities for re-use of the reclaimed and renovated water has been dis-
cussed.  (14)

Color Precipitation by Below-Saturation Lime Concentrations

Technical personnel at the Hodge, Louisiana mill of Continental Can

-------
Company, Inc. maintained active contact, through corporate membership
in N.C.S.I., with the N.C.S.I, color removal  research efforts.   After
several years consideration of the problem of adapting the Massive Lime
Process to their need to treat a rather large volume of effluent, a
laboratory program was begun exploring lime and other precipitants.

Data developed by Berger and others of N.C.S.I, was subjected by them
to analysis which led them to the conclusion that lime precipitation of
color, as they had practiced it, proceeds by a mechanism wherein adsorp-
tion of color bodies on solid calcium hydroxide is an essential  factor.
(15,16) .

Observations made at Hodge led to the hypothesis that soluble calcium
hydroxide could effect color precipitation at satisfactory rates by
utilizing other solid-phase surfaces for deposition.  It was further
reasoned that such a material, or combination of materials, might confer
needed thickening and dewatering properties.

The ensuing program involved addition of various solids, co-precipitation
of solids, use of flocculation aids, and a variety of mechanical and chem-
ical modifications of treatment.

In the course of the study, it was found that, in the presence of the
amounts of fiber "fines" commonly escaping paper mill reclaim systems
and passing into the sewer, color could be rapidly precipitated with
lime additions well below the normal water solubility of calcium hydrox-
ide.  The economically fortuitous availability of this material  led to
intensive study of the properties of the precipitates as related to the
precipitation conditions and the implications of various flowsheet possi-
bilities.

It was observed that samples representative of total kraft mill  effluent,
when treated with 1,000 to 1,500 mg/1 of CaO, exhibited settling rates
more rapid than simple primary clarification of the original effluent.
The precipitates could be thickened to volumes suitable for further de-
watering by vacuum filtration or centrifugation.  Direct vacuum filtra-
tion proved unpromising.  However, when these same precipitates were
mixed with recausticizing sludge (calcium carbonate) in proportions
approximating the normal availability of each, acceptable filtration
properties were found.  Formation rates from 35 Ibs./sq. ft./hr. to
several times that value were observed, depending upon the amounts of
precipitated lignin and of fiber in the mixture.

Centrifuge dewatering efforts were made, using a laboratory centrifuge
with 50ml glass bottles.  Because of the elastic nature of the fiber-
containing sludge, and because minimum cake volume could not be observed
or measured under dynamic conditions, no consistent or conclusive data
were obtained.

A small (2 g.p.m.) pilot system, providing continuous lime addition,
sedimentation and carbonation, was constructed to test the validity of

-------
bench-scale data against the variations of effluent quality, and to
compare continuous settling with laboratory batch tests.   The results
indicated consistent color reduction of kraft effluents in the range of
80 - 90%.  The presence of NSSC (hardwood) process effluent reduced this
performance, but at reasonably low ratios, the effect was not serious.
Sedimentation experience seemed to support previous estimates of per-
missible rise rates around 1.0 g.p.m./ft.2

Project Definition

Progress of the research work at Hodge had been shared with the Execu-
tive Secretary of the Louisiana Stream Control Commission.  From an
early date, the possibility of a treatment facility to handle total (or
nearly so) mill effluent was envisioned, to deal with the special  color
considerations of Hodge mill discharge into a low-flow stream.

The cost of so expensive a venture with unproven technology was forbid-
ding.  Since the most serious problems lay in the realm of integrating
the system with mill lime processing, a system large enough to establish
practicality -- but too small to serve the mill — seemed even less at-
tractive.  Since a full-scale treatment facility should have wide impli-
cations in the advance of industrial waste treatment technology, a con-
ference was arranged between representatives of Continental Can Company
and the Federal Water Pollution Control Administration (later, Federal
Water Quality Administration, and then incorporated into the Environ-
mental Protection Agency).  The possibility of a demonstration grant for
technical studies, with some participation in construction costs, under
the FWPCA program or technology development, was the subject of this meet-
ing and others to follow.

The ensuing discussions, and the agreement of the Continental Can Company
corporate management to undertake the financial commitment, led to the
offer and acceptance of a demonstration grant with the following plan and
objectives:

Beginning with the tentative flow sheet shown in Figure 1, laboratory
and pilot plant work would be extended and refined, and a facility would
be designed and built, capable of treating the entire process effluent
of the Hodge mi 11.

Upon completion of construction, the system would be placed in opera-
tion, and for a period of one year studies would be carried out and
operational effort would be made to:

     1.  Demonstrate effectiveness of the process in reducing color
         of pulp and paper mill effluents.

     2.  Demonstrate practicability of the process as a means for
         disposal of the fibrous sludge normally separated in paper
         mill primary clarification systems.
                                   7

-------
     3.  Determine effectiveness of the process in reducing oxygen
         demand of pulp and paper mill  effluents.

     4.  Assess the effects on lime calcining of using a lime kiln
         to incinerate the combined sludges (including fiber) from
         the lime treatment system.

     5.  Develop economic parameters related to the process.

It was agreed that a continuous study program would be maintained through-
out the demonstration period to record  related variations of water papa-
meters (pH, color, BOD, COD or TOC, calcium), sludge properties  and lime
kiln operations.  Interpretations would be  developed and the study expan-
ded or modified to gain broader understanding in pertinent areas.
                                   8

-------
<£>
                                LIME KILN
                    LIME
                    STORAGE
                                                    CLARIFIER
                      CAUSTICIZING LIME. MUD
                                                                    I
                                                                    I

                                                                   coz


l_
1





CLA
1<>^
            •"I
CLARIFIER    ' CORRECTION
                                                                CAR8ONATOR
                 TREATED
                 WATER
                  L/ME TO
                  KILN
                                    BELT FILTER
                           PROCESS FLOW SHEET -  EARLY VERSION
           Figure 1

-------
                             SECTION IV

                      DEVELOPING A PLANT DESIGN
Bench Studies
A renewed program of bench-scale study of the process  was instituted to
confirm the applicability and effectiveness  in treating the range of
effluent variations to be expected in plant  operation; to define more
closely the limits of the process; and to provide data for engineering
the system.


Color Removal Efficiency.  A series of jar tests was  conducted to exa-
mine the effect of the lime dosage and reaction time  on color removal
efficiency.  The results are plotted in Figure 2.  It  appears that at a
dosage of 1,000 mg/1 Ca(OH)2 and greater, reaction time is not important.
The benefit of adding amounts of lime greater than 1,000,mg/1 is small,
in this case.  The original color of this effluent was 300 units, which
is fairly low, and the source is a combined  screen room and paper machine
sewer.

A similar series was conducted with additions of kraft black liquor and
NSSC brown liquor to simulate total mill  effluent of  an integrated mill.
The mixture had a color of 550 units, representing the equivalent of a
mill with good pulp washing and low recovery losses.   Treatment with
lime at several concentrations and reaction  times was  employed to gen-
erate the data plotted in Figure 3.  It is apparent that at any level
of lime dosage, the efficiency of color removal is lower than in the
previous series.  The effect of reaction time still appears to be small.
Using 1,500 mg/1 Ca(OH)2 (or 1,135 mg/1 CaO), an 85%  color reduction
was observed.  It will be noted that this curve does  not appear to extra-
polate to zero on the abscissa; this is largely due to carbonates in the
effluent, which precipitate some of the calcium ion.

Another series of tests were made using effluent obtained while the mill
was producing and using some NSSC as well as kraft pulp.  The color of
the effluent was 2,820 units, which is in the high range, and the pre-
dominant contribution of color was from the  semi-chemical process.  At
a lime (calcium hydroxide) dosage of 1,600 mg/1, a 68% color removal was
achieved, and at that dosage increasing the  reaction  time from 30 minutes
to 60 minutes had no effect.  These data are shown in  Table 1.
                                   10

-------
  70O

  90

  80

  70
ih60
o
OJ
or 40
030
  10
                                    REACTION TIMES
                                    X   O MINUTES
          D
          A
          V
          O
15 MINUTES
30MINUTES
SO MINUTES
   MINUTES
         Zoo   ^oo   eoo
        LIME ADDITION ,
80O  TOGO  12.00
 /L.  as  CaO
     Hoo
EFFECT OF TIME AND LIME DOSAGE ON COLOR
(KRAFT)
Figure 2

                         11

-------
  TOO
   9o
5
UJ
O
U.
80
70
o  50
ui
g
8  30
                                    REACTION TIMES
                                    X   O MINUTES
                                    O   JS
                                    D   30
                                    A   GO MINUTES
                                    v   90 MINUTES
         200   -f-00   600   800   1000   7200
           LIME ADDITION ,
as
                                         CaO
EFFECT OF TIME AND LIME DOSAGE ON COLOR  (WITH NSSC)
                                                 Figure 3
                          12

-------
                               TABLE 1

                   EFFECT OF VARIABLES  ON % COLOR
                   REMOVAL EFFICIENCY (WITH NSSCj

          Treatment                Lime Addition as Ca(OH)2
          Time, min            1.200 mg/1            1,600 mg/1
             30                   18.4                   68.1
             60                   41.5                   68.0

Several trials were made in which black liquor and brown liquor  were
added to a kraft screen room and paper  mill effluent.   "Normal"  (N)
amounts of these liquors were estimated, to represent proportional waste
inputs of these materials from all mill sources.  Twice-normal amounts
of black and brown liquors were added to determine their effect.   In
these series, the effluent samples were treated with 1,500 mg/1  Ca(OH)2
for 30 minutes.  The results are presented in Table 2.   They  indicate
that about 90% color removal is achieved on effluent to which no additions
were made.  Addition of 2N black liquor had little effect on  the color
removal efficiency.  However, the data  in sets "B" and "C" suggest that
the color of the added brown liquor is  considerably more difficult to
remove, and that black liquor may actually assist in removal  of  NSSC
color.
                               TABLE 2

               EFFECT OF ADDED BLACK AND BROWN LIQUOR
                    ON % COLOR REMOVAL EFFICIENCY
          Samp!e
            A
            A
            B
            B
            C
            C

All of the work described above was done by "jar-test" techniques.  In
addition, a number of runs were made with the 2 g.p.m. pilot plant re-
ferred to in Section III.  One series yielded the data shown in Table 3.
The pilot plant was operated with 20 minutes retention in the reactor and
rise rates of about 1.0 g.p.m./ft.2 in the clarifiers.  Retention time in
each clarifier was also about 20 minutes.  For this series, feed effluent
was stored in a tank, so that feed for each run would be constant in com-
position.  The series contains some feed samples darkly colored due to
the presence of brown liquor.  It appears that color reduction efficien-
cies in excess of 80% are possible if sufficient lime is added.
                                   13
Black
Liquor
none
2N
none
2N
none
2N ,
Brown
None
88
86
92
90
90
89
Liquor Added
2N
85"
82
57
79
49
59

-------
                               TABLE 3

                   PILOT PLANT COLOR REMOVAL  DATA

            Input      Output      % Color       mg/1
            Color      Color       Removal     CaO Added
              850         90         90          1,000
              900         60    v     93          1,000
            4,000      2,300         42          1,000
            4,750        825         83          2,000
            1,950        300         85          2,100
              475        215         55          1,000

Calcium Distribution.   The purpose of the carbonator  and  second  clarifier
(see flow sheet, Figure 1) is to recover lime which remains  soluble  in
the discharge from the first clarifier.  It is  relevant,  therefore,  to
ask how much lime is available for recovery and how much  is  precipitated
in the first clarifier.

Calcium analyses were made on the  supernatant liquid  from a  number of
the jar tests described above.  Calcium data  from the tests  mentioned
above in reference to Figure 2 and Figure 3 are presented in Tables  4
and 5.  These data show that the percentage of  the calcium precipitated
in the reaction is increased when  pulping waste liquors are  added to the
effluent at any level  of calcium dosage.  Further,  they indicate that as
the lime dosage is increased, the  percentage  of the calcium  precipitated
also increases.  In the proposed range of lime  dosage, roughly half  of
the calcium will remain in the effluent leaving the first clarifier.

In any interpretation of the above data, it should be noted  that the sol-
uble carbonate content of the effluent will  react with lime  to form  cal-
cium carbonate, thus reducing the  Ca(OH)2 concentration available to
promote color-reduction mechanisms.   Since the  carbonate  content before
lime addition was not determined,  and carbon  dioxide  absorption  was  not
rigorously avoided during the jar-test procedures, conclusions drawn from
the data should not be over-extended.

Despite the reservations just stated, one clear conclusion is evident
(in addition to the approximate fraction of lime in solution):   the
color-precipitation reaction is not strictly stoichiometric  with respect
to the calcium removed from solution.
                                   14

-------
                               TABLE 4
                   EFFECT OF TIME AND LIME DOSAGE
                      ON CALCIUM PRECIPITATlM

                  Calcium in Supernate, mg/1 as Ca
                            Lime Dosage, mg/1 Ca(OH)2
                               1.000      1.500
                               ~29T~      ~37l~
     Time
     Min.       500
     T~       T3T
      15        148       328        416
      30        168       316        434
      60        260       292        432
      90        138       320        400
Average as
Ca(OH)2         312       574        762

% of Ca
Precipitated     37.6     42.6        49.2
                    2,000
                    "2BT"
                     500
                     460
                     528
                     468

                     892
                                                       55.4
                               TABLE 5

              EFFECT OF TIME AND LIME DOSAGE ON CALCIUM
                    PRECIPITATION (KITH ADDED LIQUOR)~

                    Calcium in Supernate, mg/1  as Ca
      % of Ca
      Precipitated
500
TTF
136
104
148
104

226
                 54.8
                          Lime Dosage
                              1,000
                                 mg/1  Ca(OH)2
                                   1,500
                                260
                                272
                                244
                                296

                                481
51.9
                                     324
                                     368
                                     340
                                     412

                                     638
                      57.5
                   2,000
                   ""SET
                     400
                     456
                     484
                     452

                     797
60.2
Settling of Color Sludge.  The effluent sample treatments used to
generate the data for Figures 2 and 3 were also used to determine set-
tling rates.  The settling rate information is presented in Figure 4
and Figure 5.  All of these rates were greater than 3.5 inches per min-
ute.  On this basis, it appeared that earlier projections of a clarifier
rise rate of 1.0 g.p.m./ft.  were amply justified.   The adequacy of this
design rate was also confirmed by observation of the pilot plant opera-
tion.
                                     15

-------
z

2

DC
ul
D-
to
UJ
X
vj
lu
vD
Z
_J
K

UU
00
X-REGULAR  EFFLUENT
0-UQUOR ADDED
              I
^oo       
-------
                   X-RE6ULAR EFFLl/ENT

                   O-LIQUOR ADDED
                                 -x
                                 -o
    ZO      4-0      60

        REACTION  TIME
   80

MINUTES
loo
EFFECT OF REACTION TIME ON SETTLING
            Figure 5
                 17

-------
Statistical Study.  A half-replicate of a 25 factorial experiment was run
to test the effects of reaction time, lime dosage, temperature, the in-
fluence of brown liquor, and the influence of black liquor.   The response
measured was color reduction.  The data are presented in Table 6.

                               TABLE 6

            FIVE - VARIABLE STATISTICAL STUDY OF PROCESS

     Temp.
      QF.
      100
      120
      100
      120
      100
      120
      100
      120
      100
      120
      100
      120
      100
      120
      100
      120


The analysis was done by a statistical  specialist in Continental  Can
Company's Central Packaging Research Laboratory in Chicago.   She reported
the following results:

     1.   There was no detectable effect of temperature on time
         of reaction.

     2.   Increased lime addition improved the efficiency of  color
         removal (95% confidence).

     3.   As the amount of black liquor was increased, the efficiency
         of color removal was increased (90% confidence).

     4.   As the amount of brown liquor was increased, the efficiency
         of color removal decreased (99% confidence).

The last two conclusions confirm strongly the earlier observations that
the color of black liquor is much more easily removed than the color of
brown liquor.

Sludge Quantities.   The amount of sludge from the color precipitation
(first)  clarifier must be known, to insure provision of adequate  dewater-

                                   18
Ca(OH)2
mg/1
800
800
1,600
1,600
800
800
1,600
1,600
800
800
1,600
1,600
800
800
1,600
1,600
Time,
Min.
30
30
30
30
90
90
90
90
30
30
30
30
90
90
90
90
Black
Liquor
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
3N
3N
3N
3N
3N
3N
3N
3N
Brown
Liquor
3N
N
N •
3N
N
3N
3N
N
N
3N
3N
N
3N
N
N
3N
% Color
Reduction
44.4
63.2
80.0
72.8
56.8
55.0
32.8
92.0
84.6
74.1
80.2
86.3
61.2
75.4
89.7
85.8

-------
ing and kiln capacities.  Although estimates had been made on the basis
of theoretical treatment of data already obtained, further data were
obtained by a direct empirical approach.  This was done using 50-gallon
batches of effluent to which known amounts of lime were added.   The
sludge was allowed to settle and separate, and a dry weight was deter-
mined.  The results are shown in Table 7.  It is seen that the  amount of
sludge is roughly proportional to the amount of lime added, and that at
a lime dosage of 1,200 mg/1, about 5 tons of sludge can be expected from
each million gallons of effluent.  The amount roughly doubles when the
lime dosage is doubled.  From this information normal sludge solids were
projected on the basis of the 1,200 mg/1 data, and peak loads on the basis
of 2,400 mg/1 level.
                                                       f
Obviously, sludge solids values will be affected by variations  in fiber
content of the effluent.
                               TABLE 7

                  ESTIMATED AMOUNT OF COLOR SLUDGE

Sample Date
11/06
11/06
11/07
11/07
11/07
11/09
11/09
11/09
11/10
11/10
11/11
11/11
11/14

CaO, mg/1
1,200
1,200
1,200
1,200
1,200
2,400
2,400
2,400
2,400
2,400
2,400
2,400
1,200
Sludge,
Tons Per Day
55
52
59
59
62
105
138
122
118
120
135
139
78
Trials made with 50-gallon samples.
Calculated to total effluent of 12 million gallons per day.


Thickening of Color Sludge.  Removal of as much water as possible from
the color precipitation sludge prior to filtration or centrifugation is
advantageous because it will reduce the design size of these expensive
devices.  Moreover, if filtration is integrated with that of causticiz-
ing sludge, excessive filtrate volume would increase soda losses in
proportion to the amount of filtrate not usable as weak wash.

The response of color clarifier sludges to the action of a picket-type
thickener was next studied.  If such a thickener should prove effective,
it was felt that either the sludge could be fed to a separate thickener,

                                    19

-------
or the rake mechanism of the first clarifier could be designed to produce
a thickening action.  The second of these alternatives seemed the more
attractive, since it would be less expensive.   Suppliers  were approached
at this time to solicit suggestions concerning suitable mechanisms for
this purpose.

In thickening sludges of this type, the critical  dimension is the area
of the sludge blanket, rather than the depth.   "Unit area" (U.A.) is
defined as the area in square feet required to thicken a  sludge flow of
one ton per day from a given starting consistency to a desired final
consistency.  The units of "U.A." are square feet per ton per day.

A series of laboratory thickening tests was run using sludge produced in
the 2 g.p.m. pilot plant.  One group was run using a lime dosage of 2,400
mg/1 CaO, and another using 1,200 mg/1 lime.  Resultant unit areas re-
quired to achieve 10% solids with 2,400 mg/1 group are shown in Figure 6.
It can be seen that to thicken from 2% to 10% solids will require a unit
area of about 40 square feet per ton per day.   Since it has been esti-
mated that there would be about 10 tons per day of sludge produced at
this lime addition rate, a total thickening area of 400 square feet per
daily million gallons effluent would be necessary.  This  is approximately
half the area which would be provided by the most rapid clarifier rise
rate which was contemplated.

The analysis of the 1,200 mg/1 lime addition group did not yield such
neat figures.  The reason for the scatter was not determined with cer-
tainty, but the data still appeared useful.  (Variable fiber content may
have been involved, and variable carbonate content would  affect the ac-
tive lime concentration, especially at the lower lime dose.)  The data
are shown in Table 8.  The highest unit area shown is 154 square feet
per ton per day.  Since 5 tons of sludge per million gallons are estima-
ted, a total thickening area 770 sauare feet per daily million gallons
is required for this worst case.  (A median value around  60 square feet
per ton per day is indicated.)  A capability prediction of 10% solids
content for thickened sludge seemed reasonable.

                              TABLE 8
                    COLOR SLUDGE THICKENING DATA
Sludge Number
5
5
6
6
8
8
24
25
35
35
*Unit Area (U.A.
Initial Solids /
2.2
4.4
3.2
6.3
2.9
5.8
2.1
1.9
2.0
1.0
), sq. ft./t.p.d.
I Unit Area Required*
67
52
45
34
47
27
99
154
104
114
to obtain 10% final solid:
                                                                   Efflu-
     ent treated with 1,200 mg/1 CaO, except No. 5 treated with 800 mg/1.
                                   20

-------
T5
 Q_
3-40
   20
   10
      X
                                   SLUDGE   No
                                     O - 9
                                     
-------
The calculations used to arrive at the conclusions in Table 8 were based
upon the technique discussed by Rich (17).   The data were also analyzed
by a staff specialist of a major manufacturer of clarification equip-
ment, and he arrived at essentially the same conclusions.

Sludge Filtration.  A program of study was  directed to the fi 1 terabi1ity
of mixtures of primary clarifier sludge and causticizing lime mud.  Mix-
tures of lime mud and effluent sludge were  subjected to filter leaf tests.
The filtering cycle used employed half of the cycle time for filtration,
a quarter of the time for drying and a quarter of the time "dead."  Fil-
ter leaf tests usually were made using 20,  30, and 40-second filtering
durations.  When other times were used, they are noted.

The importance of the relative amount of lime mud and sludge is illus-
trated by the data in Table 9.  For this series, a quantity of effluent
was treated with 800 mg/1 CaO.  The resulting sludge then was mixed with
several amounts of lime mud taken at about  35% solids from the mill's
mud washer.  Lime mud alone will filter at  the rate of 300 - 350 pounds
per hour per square foot.  Examination of the data in the table shows
that when mixed with sludge, the filtering  rates are considerably slower
and that the rate is strongly influenced by the proportion of lime mud
to sludge.

For most of the testing program, 50-gallon  batches of effluent were
treated with appropriate amounts of lime, and the sludge produced was
mixed with a proportional amount of lime mud.  In practice, the sludge
from 50 gallons was mixed with 2.5 pounds (O.D. basis) of lime mud.
This mixture represents the conditions of a mill using 175 tons per day
of CaO for causticizing, and treating 12 million gallons of effluent
daily.

                              TABLE 9

                     EFFECT ON FILTERING RATE OF
                  RATIO OF MUD SOLIDS TO SLUDGE SOLIDS

            Mud/Sludge Ratio*              Filtration Rate**
                  3.0                           29.1
                  4.9                           54.2
                  7.0                           95.2
             *Lbs. mud solids added to sludge from 100 gallons effluent.
            **(Lb.)/(Hr.)(sq.ft.), at 30 second formation time.

Some work was done to demonstrate the effect of the solids content of the
mud-sludge mixture on the filtration rate.   Two sets of data illustrating
the effect are shown in Table 10.  It is apparent that as the solids con-
tent is increased, the filtration rate is improved, and it is concluded
that an effort should be made to provide as much mechanical dewatering
capacity as possible in the system prior to filtration in order to mini-
mize the work required by the filters.  Picket thickeners would seem
suitable devices for this purpose.  These data also illustrate the marked

                                   22

-------
Solids Before
Filtration, %
10.0
10.0
14.3
14.3
9.3
9.3
9.3
12.8
12.8
12.8
Formation Time
Seconds
18
36
18
36
30
45
60
30
45
60
Formation Rate
(lb.)/'(Hr.)(sq. ft.)
44.0
65.5
59.9
82.2
73.4
59.0
51.0
114.0
91.7
82.0
improvement in filtration rate brought about by using a faster cycle.
The negative aspect of this expedient is the thinner cake produced; if
a belt filter were required, separation of cake from the filtering belt
would become a problem if the cake became too thin and flexible.


                              TABLE 10

          EFFECT OF SLUDGE CONCENTRATION ON FILTRATION RATE
 Day
10/10
10/10
10/10
10/10
10/17
10/17
10/17
10/17
10/17
10/17

There are presented in Table 11 average sludge/mud filtration rates for
the days indicated.  The data are arranged in order of increasing fil-
terability, rather than in chronological order.  Where available, the
solids content of the mixture prior to filtration is shown.   These data
are applicable for a drum at 50% submergence, using a 30-second formation
time.  On the average, if a 20-second formation time were used, the fil-
tration rates would be about 20% higher.  It should be noted, too, that
the initial solids content of the sludge mixtures average about 15%.  It
should also be remarked that thickening studies indicate the possibility
that the solids content of material going to the filter might be as high
as 25%, in which case higher filtration rates may be expected.  It is
apparent from the data that there is considerable day-to-day variation in
the filtration rates.  The reason for this variation was not known; per-
haps it is related to the amount of fiber fines in the white water.  Be-
cause of this variability, and because experimental data may never reveal
the full range of possible conditions, considerable judgment must be ex-
ercised in sizing a filter for this application.

In Table 11 are also presented moisture data on the filter cake after
filtration.  An average of 48% solids is noted.  When lime mud alone is
filtered by the same technique, the filter cake is at about 60% solids.
It is felt that in practice, the solids content of the mud/sludge cake
will be about 50 - 52%, which is slightly higher than the laboratory
data indicate, but still considerably lower than normal lime mud.

Carbonation and Carbonate Settling.  Recovery of soluble calcium after
the initial clarification next received some study.  The flow scheme in-
                                   23

-------
                              TABLE 11

                      AVERAGE FILTRATION RATES

          Mud/Sludge Mix       Filtration Rate,     Filter Cake,
   Day       % Solids       (lb.)/(hr.)(sg. ft.)     % Solids
  10/19        --—                 31                  48
  10/21        	                 32                  45
  10/14        14.0                 33
  10/22        13.0                 49                  45
  10/16        	                 54                  52
  10/20        15.3                 57                  50
  11/10        	                 58                  50
  11/07        15.4                 59-1/2              47
  11/09        	                 64                  49
  10/23        	                 66                  46
  11/06        10.4                 67-1/2              49
  11/09        12.2                 71                  47
  11/08        14.5                 72                  47
  11/06        19.1                103                  48
  10/18        	                106                  45
  10/17        	                123                  50
                                          Average       48%
  Formation time - 30 seconds
volves reacting the soluble calcium hydroxide with the carbon dioxide
from lime kiln stack gas; the resulting calcium carbonate is then re-
moved by sedimentation, dewatered, and calcined.   The most important
questions recognized at this point were:

     1.  Design of gas-liquid transfer system to effect reaction of
         the carbon dioxide.

     2.  Determination of the restraints establishing the extent of
         reaction to provide optimum recovery Of calcium.

     3.  Mechanical considerations leading to most rapid and complete
         sedimentation of the calcium carbonate precipitate.

The first question seemed reasonable amenable to established chemical
engineering knowledge and methods.  Calcium carbonate scale formation
and foam generation were recognized as problems.

The pH of the solution was taken as the readily measurable parameter by
which to measure progress of the reactions:

     Ca(OH) + C02         ' > CaCQ3 + H20

     CaCOs  + H20 + C02      » CaH2 (C03)2(Calcium bicarbonate)


                                   24

-------
The pilot plant carbonator was run at different carbon dioxide flow
rates to vary the pH of the carbonated effluent leaving.  The carbon-
ated effluent was centrifuged and an analysis made for dissolved cal-
cium.  The results are presented in Figure 7.  They show a minimum
dissolved calcium content at about pH 9.6.  At lower pH levels, the
dissolved calcium increases because of bicarbonate formation.  Gener-
ally, low levels of dissolved calcium were observed over the pH range
8.5 - 10.5.

These pH values are notably lower than those reported for the "massive
lime" study, (9) where a minimum solubility was indicated above pH 11.
It is probable the difference is due to the fact the NCSI study dealt
with bleach extraction wastes high in sodium alkali.  In the presence
of dissolved lime, this alkali is virtually all NaOH.  Carbonation
yields carbonate, and then bicarbonate -- both soluble.  The carbonate
from this source enters into the solubility product which determines
solubility of calcium carbonate.  It is to be expected, therefore, that
the pH for minimum CaC03 solubility will vary with soda alkalinity of the
starting effluent.

It was noted in the NCSI research that there seemed to be an optimum
pH at which the calcium carbonate flocculated to provide good settling.
Numerous observations were made in the present study, both of jar test
and pilot plant runs; none led to a reproducible flocculating condition.
There were scattered, transient evidences that raised hopes briefly,
however.

The pilot plant system was operated to seek information on recovery
at the post-carbonation clarification step.  The Hodge pilot plant
clarifier had severe limitations for this purpose.  There was almost
no opportunity for floe formation, and mean retention time was less
than 20 minutes.  The total up-flow path was only about two feet, and  ,
the calculated rise rate was about 1.0 g.p.m. per square foot.

The pilot plant was operated using a lime slurry pumping rate a little
above 1,000 mg/1 CaO while carbonation was carried out at three differ-
ent pH levels.  The amount of calcium entering and leaving the clarifier
was measured, so that the clarifier efficiency could be measured.  The
results are shown in Table 12.  About 70% of the calcium entering the
clarifier was recovered; the best result was obtained at pH of 8.5, but
the spread of results was small enough to raise a question whether they
validly indicate a significantly preferable pH.

Considering the crude design of the pilot plant clarifier, this effi-
ciency didn't seem bad.  Since a similar process in municipal softening
systems is operated routinely without difficulty, it was felt that 90%
recovery in a properly designed, full-scale unit was not an unrealistic
expectation.  Because more than half the feed calcium would be recovered
in the first clarifier, the indicated overall recovery would amount to
about 95%.
                                   25

-------
   1GO
O
   no
   100
I 80
 o
iij
 a
   60
   40
   20
          11        10        9        8
              CARBONATION   pH
 EFFECT OF CARBONATION pH ON DISSOLVED CALCIUM
Figure 7
                           26

-------
                              TABLE 12

            EFFICIENCY OF PILOT PLANT CARBONATE CLARIFIER

                 Carbonation              Efficiency
                     PH                       %
                     TO                    66.6
                      9.5                    67.6
                      8.5                    70.6

         The calcium concentration to clarifier = 554 mg/1  as CaO.


Treatment Suitability of Various Wastes.  Samples from various branch
sewers of the mill effluent system were collected to evaluate their
relative color contributions and to provide a basis for determining
which should not be (or need not be) treated by the proposed system.
It was concluded that effluent from bag plant, power plant, water treat-
ment and causticizing areas need not be treated.  Tall oil plant sewer
waste was judged undesirable because of the occasional release of a
batch of sodium sulfate brine.  At high sulfate concentration, calcium
sulfate will be precipitated, reducing the calcium hydroxide available
for color precipitation, and contaminating the kiln product when the
sludge is calcined.  If a holding pond were available to distribute the
impact over a suitable dilution of other effluent, a different choice
might be made.

During examination of the various component subdivisions of sewer flow,
it was noted that no tests were recorded in which the raw waste was
primarily from a waste liquor source not modified by papermaking pro-
cesses.  Samples from the sewer of the digester and washer area were
treated at two lime dosage levels.  The results are shown in Table 13.
They show that, on these generally dark samples, the treatment was able
to remove in excess of 80% of the color, even at relatively low levels
of addition.

                              TABLE 13
                               ._
                     FROM PULPING AREA EFFLUENT

                                      Color Removal Efficiency. %
                      Effl. Color,    Lime AddedLime Added
     Day     NSSC*     APHA Units      760 mg/1        1,520 mg/1
    1T708    "Yes"        27BT3857886.7
    11/10     No         1,500           66.7            91.7
    11/11     Yes        3,500           71.4            78.6
    11/12     No         1,950           76.4            	
    11/13     No    r-    3,190           81.8            91.9

    *0n "Yes" days, about 3Q% of pulp produced was NSSC (remainder, kraft).

                                   27

-------
Centrifuge Dewatering.  Although the accumulated data indicated that an
acceptable dewatering of color sludge could be accomplished by mixing
with causticizing mud washer underflow and filtering with a belt filter,
two disadvantages were recognized:

     1.  Soda removal from causticizing mud would be hindered,
         resulting in higher soda input to the kiln.

     2.  The belt filter requires closer attention than con-
         ventional, precoat-type mud filters.

Solid-bowl centrifuge dewatering of combined sludges had be,en considered
earlier as an alternative to belt filtration, but was deemed unfeasible
because of a tendency to leave lighter portions of the solids (e.g., pre-
cipitated color bodies) in the liquid discharge.  Separate centrifuging
of the first clarifier sludge had not received much serious consideration
because of the low solids levels obtained in laboratory trials.

A fresh examination of process material balances, as well as the promise
of better adaptability to remote operation control, led to further con-
sideration of this technique.  It became apparent that, since caustici-
zing mud is commonly discharged at 65% solids from a conventional  precoat
filter, the separate concentration of first clarifier sludge to slightly
over 20% solids would be comparable to the belt filter dewatering of com-
bined sludges to 50% solids.  Figure 8 shows the effect of increased
sludge dewatering.  Pilot-plant samples of sludge were prepared for test-
ing by centrifuge manufacturers.

Two 5-gallon samples were tested by one manufacturer in specialized test
apparatus with discouraging results.  Their data indicated an assured
solids concentration of only 15%, with appreciable solids carry-over in
the centrate liquid.

A 55-gallon sample sent to another company was processed through a very
small commercial type solid-bowl continuous centrifuge with quite promis-
ing results.  Discharge cake solids contents of 20 - 25% were achieved;
solids removal, as high as 98% was found feasible by use of a flocculant.
The data from this series of trial runs appear in Tables 14 and 15.  Ar-
rangements were made to rent a similar centrifuge both to conduct further
tests and to prepare sludge for other experimental purposes.

A rented centrifuge was delivered to the mill, where pilot lots of sludge
had been prepared for processing.  The Sharpies Model 600 centrifuge has
a normal volumetric throughput maximum of about 6 gallons per minute.
Standard rotational speed is 5,000 r.p.m., representing a relative cen-
trifugal force of about 2,100 times gravity.  Operating variables include:

 .    1.  Pond depth.
                                                   i
     2.  Speed differential of internal conveyor screw.
                                   28

-------
  •££0
z
y
Of
111
I
tn
O
  •400
  350
               CAUSTICIZING FILTER
                @ 68 %  SOLIDS
               COLOR  SLUDGE  CAKE
         CAKE
          AS SHOWN
COM PAR 150 N-
COMBINED SLUDGES
BELT HLTfR @ <5O %
                18     ZO     22    24
              SOLIDS,  COLOR  SLUDGE  CAKE
        EFFECT OF COLOR SLUDGE DEWATERING
                   Figure 8
                          29

-------
     3.   Feed slurry solids concentration.
     4.   Feed slurry flow rate.

     5.   Additives to aid flocculation and  drainage.

The Model 600 is a small  unit -- a choice made  necessary by the diffi-
culty in preparing large quantities of representative sludge.   The inlet
ports are small, and a small  feed pump is required.   As  a result of these
dimensions, (together with the fibrous nature of the  sludge) high sludge
concentrations were difficult to pump, and  flow rate  was difficult to
adjust.

                              TABLE 14
     Test No.
                     CENTRIFUGE TRIALS (FACTORY)
  1
                                          8
 Feed:
   Code
   Rate, #/Hr.
   % Insols.
   Insols, #/Hr.

 Centrate:
   Rate, #/Hr.
   % Insols.
   Insols, #/Hr.

 Cake:
   Rate, #/Hr.
   % Water
   Water, #/Hr.

 % of Solids
 Unsedimented

 Flocculant:
   Sol 'n, gph
   Dose, #/T, s/s

 RCF x g.

 Pond

 Convr.  diff.
 A     A
322  736
  A     A
1315  1411
                          A
                        2400
 B      B      B
432  1171  2215
3.25  3.25  3.25  3.25  3.25  2.93  2.93  2.93
10.4  23.9  42.6  45.9  78.0  12.7  34.3  65.0
 240   618  1120  1210  2160   390  1065  2040
.005  .027  .157  .189  .695  .088  .387  .600
0.01  0.17  1.80  2.30  15.0  0.34  4.10  12.3
  82   118   195   201    240    42   106   175
87.2  80.0  79.1  78.2   73.8  70.5  71.5  69.7
71.6  94.3   154   157    177   29.6 75.8   122
0.10  0.71  4.20  5.00  19.2  2.70  12.0  19.0


zero


2100

   3
50rpm
                             20rpm
                                   30

-------
                              TABLE 15
      Test No.
 Feed:
   Code
   Rate, #/Hr.
   % Insols.
   Insols, #/Hr.

 Centrate:
   Rate, |/Hr.
   % Insols.
   Insols, f/Hr.

 Cake:
   Rate, #/Hr.
   % Water
   Water, #/Hr.

 % of Solids
 Unsedimented

 Flocculant:
   Sol'n, gph
   Dose, f/T, s/s

 RCF x g

 Pond

 Convr. d-iff.,  rpm
CENTRIFUGE TRIALS (FACTORY)

   9       10      11       12
 1347    1347
 .037    .040
 0.50    0.54
 15.0
  6.4

 2100'

    4

   20
1336    1345
0.040   .177
0.54    2.4
 183     183     194     185
79.0    79.5    80.2    80.2
 145     145     156     148
 1.3     1.4     1.4     6.2
7.50    3.75    1.50
 3.2     1.6     0.6
                 13
                                2770
                                .146
                                4.1
                                  290
                                 74.5
                                  216
                                  5.3
                7.50
                 1.6
                                         14
C
1530
2.55
39.0
C
1530
2.55
39.0
C
1530
2.55
39.0
C
1530
2.55
39.0
C
3060
2.55
78.0
C
3060
2.55
78.0
                                2754
                                .088
                                2.4
                         306
                        75.3
                         230
                         3.1
                                        75.0
                                         3.2
As shown by Tables 16, 17, and 18, adjustment to comparatively  low  pond
depth and differential speed resulted in cake densities  in  the  range of
22 - 25%.  Excellent recovery percentages were obtained  with  the  use of
a polymeric flocculant, and fairly satisfactory ones  were achieved  with-
out such additives.  It was considered likely that part-time  use  of a
flocculant would suffice to prevent excessive buildup of "fines"  in the
system.

The potential advantage of separate sludge dewatering to such levels,  as
compared to the belt filter, was estimated by the following calculations:
     Basis of calculations:
          Causticizing mud solids
          Color clarifier solids
          Attainable % solids, conventional
             mud filtration
                          367 tons/day
                           63 tons/day

                           65 - 70%
                                   31

-------
                                                  TABLE 16
co
ro
Run No.
Centri f uge :
Diff. , rpm
Pond
Torque
Effl. gpm
Solids, %:
Feed
Cake
Effl uent
Recov. , %
Flocculant,
*/T, D.S.
1 2

51 51
3 3
1.0 1.5
0.80 3.32

2.55 2.47
24.0 23.1
0.15 0.49
94.1 80.0
none 	 ^
CENTRIFUGE TRIALS (MILL LAB)
3456

51 51 51 51
3 3.5 3.5 3.5
1.2 0.5
2.1.4 0.50 0.84 2.14

4.00 2.77 2.84 2.98
22.9 26.3 17.3 18.5
0.74 .048 0.19 0.39
81.4 98.4 93.4 86.0

7 8

51 51
3,5 3.5
1.0
3.36 3.80

2.87 2.84
19.9 21.4
0.52 0.52
84.0 83.6

9 10

51 51
3.5 4
1.2
1.14 0.83

3.14 3.23
20.4 6.53
0.26 0.27
93.0 56.1

11

51
4
2.00

3.24
6.94
0.59
89.3

    RCF x g
2100

-------
                                             TABLE 17
CENTRIFUGE
14
51
3.5
1.2
15
51
3.5

16
51
3.5
2.0
TRIALS
17
51
3.5
1.2
(MILL LAB)
18 19 20 21 22 23
51 51 51 51 51 51
3.5 3.5 3 3 3 3

       Run No.     12    13

    Centri fuge:

      Diff.,  rpm   51     51
      Pond          4    3.5
      Torque             1.5

"   Effl.  gpm     2.2   0.89    1.33  2.50  4.35    0.87   4.00    2.40    0.75    2.14   3.16     4.92


    Solids, %:

      Feed       3.24   5.42    5.52  5.52  5.52    6.96   7.17    7.17    5.13    5.13   5.24     5.22
      Cake       6.92   16.9    17.9  19.9  22.5    14.0   19.4    19.1    18.7    16.3   20.2     19.5
      Effluent   0.57   0.46    0.61  1.31   1.48    2.18   2.00    2.00    0.26    0.91   0.95     1.35


    Recov., %    89.7   94.2    92.2  81.7  78.5    73.1   0.5     80.5    96.4    86.8   86.7     80.0


    Flocculant,
    #/T,  D.S.     none

    RCF x  g      2100

-------
                                                TABLE 18
CO
Run No.
Centrifuge:
Diff., rpm
Pond
Torque
Ef f 1 . gpm
Solids, 55:
Feed
Cake
Effluent
Recov., %
Flocculant,
#/T, D.S.
RCF x g
CENTRIFUGE TRIALS (MILL LAB)
24 25 26 27 28 29 30

30.6 30.6 30.6 30.6 30.6 30.6 30.6
3333333
0.77 1.30 4.00 1.59 0.72 0.86 1.46
'
4.73 4.82 4.68 4.66 4.75 4.80 4.88
20.5 20.0 25.0 24.1 22.3 25.4 25.2
0.56 0.31 0.86 0.32 .014 .029 .020
98.9 95.2 84.6 93.8 99.8 99.6 99.7
none > 0.97 1.70 0.97
2100 L
31 32 33 34

30.6 30.6 30.6 30.6
3333
2.00 4.00 2.00 1.50
-
5.0 4.61 4.68 5.02
22.2 23.5 22.3 25.6
.047 .497 .017 .018
99.4 91.2 99.5 99.9
0.82 0.73 1.44 1.81


-------
          Attainable % solids, combined mud
             and sludge, belt filter            50%

          Attainable % solids, color sludge,
             centrifuge                         22 - 25%
Water Content:
430 tons combined sludge, 50% solids       430 tons water
(a) 367 tons caust. mud, 65% solids        197.6
(b) 367 tons caust. mud, 70% solids        157.3
(c) 63 tons color sludge, 22% solids       223.4
  )
     (d) 63 tons color sludge, 25% solids       189.0
            (a) plus (c)                        421.0
            (a) plus (d)                        386.6
            (b) plus (c)                        380.7
            (b) plus (d)                        346.3
It can be seen that reduction in water to be evaporated in the lime  kiln
may range from 18,000 to 167^000 pounds daily.

It was felt that the belt filter would be much  more difficult to  adapt
to remote control and minimum manpower requirements.   Moreover, main-
tenance considerations appeared to favor the centrifuge over the  belt
filter.  A flow sheet incorporating the centrifuge alternate is shown in
Figure 9.

Sludge Calcining.  During consultations with rotary kiln manufacturers
concerning special design and operational considerations for sludge
calcining, a warning was voiced.  Engineers for one manufacturer  noted
that small increases in free lime content of lime kiln feed have  caused
serious problems of ball and ring formation in  a number of kilns.

The question of whether the primary sludge of this process contains  appre-
ciable Ca(OH)2 had received much attention.  Solubility considerations
would seem to cast doubt upon such occurrence,  because the surrounding
liquid is not saturated with calcium hydroxide.  However, the sludge will
provide hydroxyl ions to causticize a solution  of sodium carbonate,  and
(as has been previously noted) the calcium content of the sludge  does not
follow a definite stoichiometric relationship to identifiable calcium-
precipitating anions.

Discussions of the problem with engineers of two kiln manufacturers  raised
the following questions, among others:
                                      !
     1.  Will the associated organic materials, co-precipitated with
         the calcium and hydroxyl ions, alter the effect, compared
         to calcium hydroxide?

     2.  Will the fiber content serve to reduce the balling and
         ringing tendency?

                                   35

-------
                                                        CARBON DIOXIDE
                                                       JU "
                                              KJLN
    MILL EFFLUENT
CO
                                              FIRST
                                            CLARIFIER
        SECOND
       CLARIFIER
                                                        CARBONATOR
            TO  KILN  «*
CAU5TICIZ./NG
      MUD
                          PH
                       ADJUSTMENT
                                                                                            DECOLORIZEP
                                                                                            EFFL^EfVT   TO
                                                                                            OXIDATION  PONDS
                                 FLOW SHEET WITH CENTRIFUGE
                            Figure 9

-------
     3.  Are there operational correctives which would allow
         successful calcining in the presence of free lime?

The first two questions attracted no firm opinions, and'the third elicited
disagreement among the experts.

Laboratory calcining had established the satisfactory chemical  composi-
tion of lime made from the process sludge, but such procedures  offered
little guidance to physical behavior in a rotary kiln.  Further confer-
ences with a kiln maker dealt with the possibility of pilot-scale calcin-
ing as a means of resolving the questions.  A pilot-plant kiln, I1  dia-
meter by 10' long, was available which would require some 50 pounds per
hour of feed (recausticizing  sludge with proportional color-removal
sludge).  It was felt provision should be made to run up to 20  hours.
With our small-scale facilities, and the problems of thickening, the
accumulation of sufficient color-removal sludge was tedious, but the
availability of the small, solid-bowl continuous centrifuge made it
possible to concentrate it properly.

A quantity of the centrifuged sludge containing about 200 pounds of solids
was mixed with causticizing sludge filter cake containing about 1,500
pounds of solids.  This mixture was subsequently calcined, with encour-
aging  results.  This operation was conducted and observed by a  group ex-
perienced in interpretation of miniature kiln performance.  Their report
was that a slight tendency toward ring formation was evident, but that
the rings were rather fragile.  Their opinion was that, in a comparatively
large  kiln, stable and troublesome rings were not likely.

Meanwhile, alternative flow sheet modifications were developed  to elimin-
ate the free lime before calcining, if such a course should become neces-
sary.  The first clarifier sludge would be carbonated before dewatering.
In the case of centrifuge dewatering, the centrate might be used for lime
mud washing if color release  presented barriers to recycling to the clari-
fier.

Color  Changes after Lime Treatment.  As the project was approaching the
point  of major construction commitment, there were several warnings of
"color reversion" or "color pick-up" possibilities.  The warnings were
investigated, and several experiments were conducted.  The following
conclusions were reached:

     1.  Colored substances are removed and incinerated by the
         process; this color  cannot return.

     2.  Due to soda alkalinity, color can be extracted by effluent
         from woody and other plant materials in lagoons or streams.

     3.  Biological processes may increase or decrease color of
         effluent after lime  treatment.  Some quite varied obser-
         vations were made, inviting further study for which time
         was not immediately  available.

                                   37

-------
     4.  Although the effects noted in (2)  and (3)  might
         affect ultimate color effects in receiving waters,
         they do not negate the effects of the treatment.

Published Information.  Work done in the bench and  pilot phases  of the
project has been the subject of a published paper.   (18) The theoretical
considerations upon which the project conception was based has  received
support in studies directed by Dence and Luner.   (19)

Plant Design

Before entering into specifics of unit designs,  several  basic decisions
were necessary to establish the working flow sheet.   It  was  determined
that:

     1.  The sludge produced in the color precipitation  step would be
         dewatered by a continuous, solid-bowl  centrifuge.   The  oper-
         ational and economic considerations bearing upon  this  choice
         have been noted previously in the  discussion  of the centrifu-
         gation studies.

     2.  A separate reaction vessel would not be used  for  color  precipi-
         tation.  Instead, lime would be added in the  feed pipe  to the
         clarifier center flocculation well, which  would be  designed  for
         maximum reaction time.

     3.  A sewer conduit from the mill would deliver waste water to a
         lift station which would pump to a first clarifier  which would
         be at such a level that gravity flow would suffice  for  further
         transportation of the main waste stream.  There had been earlier
         hopes that gravity flow could be maintained throughout, but  the
         only feasible sites presented unacceptable sewer problems.

     4.  To provide for a then-current need for an  average daily capacity
         of 12 million gallons and a 50% reserve capability  for  peak  rates
         and for possible changes, the principal system  units would be
         designed for a maximum flow of 12,500 gallons per minute.

     5.  Provision would be made for removal of trash  and grit  from the
         waste water before adding lime.  Previous  experience with primary
         clarification of effluent had pointed out  the frequent  appearance
         of such foreign materials as sticks, rags, and  pieces  of string,
         rope, and gasketing.  These had caused serious  problems in a simple
         clarifier system; the complex system now proposed would be far more
         vulnerable to debris.  Moreover, the centrifuge would  present a
         special sensitivity to gritty, abrasive materials.

     6.  Use of lime, whether freshly purchased or  re-calcined,  would be
         common to causticizing and waste treatment, without separation
         or distinction.
                                                                       *
                                                            »

                                   38

-------
     7.  Calcium carbonate sludge, obtained by carbonation of the
         first clarifier effluent, would be mixed and filtered with
         the recausticizing "lime mud", using conventional kraft
         mill equipment.

     8.  Carbonation for lime recovery would be accomplished by use
         of lime kiln stack gas after "scrubbing" for dust removal.

Upon reviewing these decisions, along with the laboratory and pilot
plant work, the flow sheet was drawn in the form shown in Figure 10.
As a basis for preparing detailed cost estimates and for soliciting
bids, equipment needs were defined and specified.  The following sum-
mary deals with equipment in process flow sequence, rather than in the
chronological order of actual consideration.

Grit and Trash Removal.  Earliest consideration of the removal of trou-
blesome solids from the raw waste had envisioned a traveling bar screen
followed by a small basin for collection of grit and other small, dense
solids.  Further consideration of specific materials found in the efflu-
ent soon revealed need for more complex design.  It could be seen that
a bar screen would not protect adequately against strings, bits of rope,
or slender pieces of wood, all of which would then pass through pumps,
control valves, and the entrance ports of a centrifuge.  Although expected
grit volume was not large, it was apparent that other materials, such as
woody rejects from cleaners and screens, and water-logged bark would  also
settle and would comprise sufficient volume (at least occasionally) to
demand a well-designed removal and disposal system.  When a centrifuge
of very high centrifugal force was chosen for sludge processing, it was
noted that grit content of the sludge might be a prime factor in mainten-
ance costs; obviously, effective grit removal assumed added importance.

After consideration of several devices, our choice finally settled upon
a revolving disc screen.  Specifications were prepared for a unit 14  feet
in diameter with screen plates of Type 304 stainless steel, with 1/2  inch
diameter holes.  A solids-collection drag conveyor was required to gather,
dewater, and deliver solids to a container, and a spray system was pro-
vided to flush debris from the screen onto the conveyor.

The grit settling capacity was calculated upon a minimum capability,  at
peak flow, to remove all grit above about 65 mesh.  A chamber 10 feet
wide (bottom sloped to 5-foot recessed channel) and 60 feet in effective
length was provided, with a normal water depth of 7 feet 6 inches.  Con-
struction details include an overflow weir in the grit channel and a  dis-
charge weir after the disc screen, so proportioned that differential  level
across the disc screen cannot exceed about 18 inches.  (Because of the
large screen radius, drastic forces might otherwise develop in case of
screen "blinding.")

The grit collector is designed to rake a bottom channel 5 feet wide,
with buckets approximately 8 feet apart, and at a speed not exceeding
8 feet per minute.  The mechanism is specified to be capable of pulling

                                   39

-------
MILL
EFFLUENT
                                       COLOR
                                      CLARIFIER
                  I-
                 CO2
             GRIT
            CHAMBER
                                                       CARBONATiOH
                                                         BASIN
                          COLOR SLUDGE
                           CENTRIFUGE
COLOR. SLUDGE
STORAGE  TANK
                 LIME N\UD
                               CARBONATION
                                CLARIFIER
   CAUST\C MOD
STORAGE TANK
                                                                VACUUM
                                                                FILTER.
                    I
                   A
                                                  OUTLET
                                                  BASIN
                 TO  K»LN
                      FLOW SHEET FOR PLANT DESIGN
                                        Figure 10

-------
through a 9 Inch grit accumulation at the bottom of the grit channel,
dewatering and elevating the sediment to discharge into a container.

To minimize wear, neither the screening system nor the grit removal mech-
anism is operated constantly.  Operation of the screen and its  discharge
conveyor are initiated whenever head loss across the screen exceeds 2
or 3 inches, and the ensuing timer-controlled cycle is set for  a  minimum
of 3 minutes duration.  The grit conveyor operates under an adjustable
timer control, commonly set for 10 minutes running time each 60 - 120
minutes.

Lift Station.  To collect accepted effluent from the disc screen, a pump-
ing pit 18 feet in diameter by 17 feet deep was designed.   Construction
consisted of a circle of sheet piling, which was excavated deep enough
for a ballasting bottom of mass concrete.

Pump specifications provide three pumps, with 16 feet tube length, each
with capacity for 9,000 GPM at 30 feet head and 6,500 GPM at 45 feet head.
These are intended to accommodate peak flow with two units running, thus
allowing one as a spare in case of failure or routine maintenance of any
unit.

The pumps, through check valves, discharge into a manifold connecting to
a 24-inch pipe.  It is in this pipe that lime slurry is mixed with the
raw waste.

Lime Slurry System.  Lime for the treatment process is withdrawn  from a
"day bin" which is shared with the kraft causticizing system.  A  screw
conveyor with manually-controlled, variable-speed drive regulates lime
flow into a fixed-speed transfer conveyor (also screw type) which delivers
into the slaker inlet.  The variable-speed conveyor has a screw 14" in
diameter with a speed range of 1 - 3 RPM.  The transfer conveyor  screw is
also 14 inches in diameter.

The lime slaker is a. renovated unit originally used for kraft liquor
causticizing-.  It has a reaction bowl 9 feet in diameter by 7 feet deep,
supplied with a 15 HP paddle-blade mixer.  The grit classifier  is of the
oscillating rake type, with a 2 HP motor.

The slaker overflows into a slurry tank 12 feet in diameter by  10 feet
deep.  The slurry is kept tn suspension by a 7.5 HP vertical mixer.

Two slurry pumps (one a spare) are provided to deliver the lime suspen-
sion from the slurry tank to the raw waste lift pump discharge.  The
pumps are specified as rubber-lined (replaceable liners) for resistance
to abrasion.  The required performance capability is 180 GPM at 55 feet
head, with a maximum pump speed of 1,200 RPM.  The pumps discharge through
a pipe about 1,100 feet long, and no flow throttling is provided. Water
is supplied to the slurry tank to maintain a constant level; thus, the
pump delivers full discharge pressure, maintaining a velocity which should


                                   41

-------
preclude deposition on the pipe walls.   An automatic flushing (water)
cycle is initiated whenever the pump is de-energized.

Waste Clarifiers.  Since design criteria for both clarifiers  were based
on maximum rise rates of 1.0 GPM per square foot, it was possible to de-
sign them for identical internal mechanism.  (In addition to  maintenance
advantages, it would be possible to assure one primary clarifier in case
of failure of the other unit.)

The mechanisms were specified for a clarifier 135 feet in diameter, having
15 foot side water depth.  A flocculation zone equivalent to  a center  well
of 40 feet diameter was required.  Thickening-type mechanisms capable  of
developing 7% (w/w) minimum (first clarifier) sludge consistency, based
on pilot plant solids quality data, were specified.   Since shear proper-
ties and maximum consistencies,of both  sludges represented first-of-a-kind
design problems, it was determined that torque capabilities should be  the
highest competitively available in standard manufacture.  This proved  to
be a continuous rating of 1,200,000 ft-lbs., with peak load design of
1,800,000 ft-lbs.  Two long (full clarifier radius)  and two short arms
(25% minimum radius) were designed for  sludge raking.   Sludge is raked
into an annular central well, within which full  raking was required.   A
torque indicator, with transmitter for  continuous, remote recording of
rake torque, was included in the specification.   Side  or top  entry of
raw waste feed was specified; the final choice was for over-the-top entry,
with feed pipe suspended below an access walkway bridge.

The clarifier basin designs were for concrete construction.  Bottom slope
to the center was one inch per foot. Clear liquid discharge  at the upper
periphery is through 66 equally-spaced, submerged orifices 6  inches in
diameter.  An integrally-cast, external, concrete collection  trough, 3
feet wide and 6 feet deep, delivers the effluent to a  discharge box.

Sludge withdrawal is accomplished through two stainless steel pipes cast
in concrete beneath the clarifier floors.  Because of the clarifier ele-
vation, the color clarifier discharge pipes (8 inches  nominal diameter)
are essentially straight, and the ground-level pumps are only slightly
above the elevation of the inner slope  of the clarifier floor.  The car-
bonation clarifier is slightly lower; the sludge pipes (6 inches diameter)
lie parallel to the clarifier bottom and have slight bends up to pumps at
ground level (clarifier water level is  12 feet above pump suctions).

Carbonation System.  To provide for proper contacting  of color clarifier
effluent with kiln stack gas (source of carbon dioxide), a tank 30 feet
in diameter by 12 feet deep was designed.  Water from the color precipi-
tation clarifier enters just below the  water level of the carbonation
tank and flows out near the bottom.

Proposals were considered for one, three, and four agitators.  The final
choice was for four 40 HP units with turbine-type impellers driven at
85 RPM.  Considerations leading to this selection included; a more desir-
able subdivision of gas entrance points, ability to withstand temporary

                                    42

-------
outage of a unit, and avoidance of sidewall baffles which would affect
static pressures at entrance and exit openings.

It was considered probable that impellers of these agitators would accu-
mulate deposits of calcium carbonate, and various expedients were consi-
dered for protection.  Highly-polished surfaces, various alloys, elasto-
meric coatings, and repellent materials such as the fluorocarbon polymers,
were among the proposals.  None was found to give enough promise to justify
the cost, and, since there seemed to be no serious corrosion problems,
ordinary steel was specified.

Pilot plant experience and reports of related experience elsewhere had
indicated that perforated-pipe distribution of carbonation gas would re-
sult in closure of the pipe openings by scale formation.  It was also
felt that gas pipes entering through the tank bottom would be subject to
occasional back-up of water which might tend to be trapped, increasing
back-pressure.  (Required gas pressure is a substantial  factor in cost
of supplying carbonation gas.)  The final design of the  gas diffuser is
sketched in Figure 11.  Each diffuser discharges two 36-inch curtains of
gas bubbles beneath one of the agitators.  Stainless steel supply pipes,
6 inches in diameter, enter from the top of the tank. The diffusers con-
sist of half-cylinders of 6 inch radius, 36 inches long, with 1-inch, 60°
serrations on the long edges.

Outlet Basin.  The carbonation clarifier discharges into a basin about 21
feet by 27 feet, and 12 feet deep.  More kiln gas is added to adjust pH.
Horizontal, perforated pipes are used for gas diffusion; as pH drops
below 9.0, calcium carbonate solubility increases, so scaling should not
be a serious problem.  The basin also receives any overflow from the color
clarifier or carbonator.  From the basin, water can be discharged over
adjustable weirS to either the secondary treatment system or to a holding
pond.  Provision is made for vertical pumps by means of  which the "de-
colorized" water can be returned to the mill for selective re-use.

Sludge Pumps.  To withdraw sludge from the color clarifier, specifica-
tions were based upon a sludge of 7% consistency in which fiber comprised
20% of the total solids weight (dry basis).  Stated pump requirement was
for a horizontal centrifugal pump capable of handling a  10% solids content,
delivering 300 GPM at 170 feet total discharge head, with a maximum pump
speed of 1,200 RPM.

For carbonation clarifier sludge, a sludge consistency of 10%, comprised
essentially of calcium carbonate, was assumed.  A capacity of 100 GPM
at 120 feet total discharge head was required, with a maximum pump speed
of 1,200 RPM.

Changes were made in both pumps after start-up, as will  be explained
later.  The changes were dictated by the composition and properties of
the sludges.

Color Sludge Storage.  To receive sludge from the color  clarifier, a 30
                                   43

-------
GAS DIFFUSER
Figure 11

-------
foot diameter tank 20 feet deep was provided.  The tank was identical to
one specified for causticizing lime mud, and similar 15 HP agitation mech-
anism was provided.  (Supplementary agitation was added later, as will  be
noted.)  This tank provides surge capacity between the clarifier and the
centrifuge.

Color Mud Pump.  To deliver color sludge to the centrifuge, a rubber-lined
centrifugal pump, similar to those for lime slurry, was specified.  The re-
quired rate was 185 GPM at 80 feet discharge head.

Color Sludge Centrifuge.  Considerations in centrifuge requirements have
been discussed previously, especially as relates to dewatering capability.
Specifications were based upon observations which indicated that optimum
input consistency of sludge might be about 8%.  Stated solids capacity  was
70 tons per day.  Automatic protective devices, to protect against torque
overload and other probable sources of equipment hazard, were specified.

As a consequence of the required degree of dewatering, the only supplier
offering to meet the specifications was one who offered a high "G-force"
unit.  Relative centrifugal force was 1,880, at a bowl speed of 2,300 RPM.
The backdrive spindle of the planetary gear system rotating the internal
conveyor was provided with an eddy-current electric brake which permits
variation of conveyor differential speed by a ratio of two to one (approx-
imately 25 to 50 RPM).  The protective alarm system includes a signal to
discontinue feed and/or provide flushing at a preset level of conveyor
torque, and trip-out for low oil pressure, low oil flow (either bearing),
high bearing temperature (either bearing), excessive torque, low brake-
cooling water pressure, or high brake-cooling water outlet temperature.
A fault detector display panel indicates trip-out cause.

The centrifuge solids are delivered by a screw conveyor into the lime
kiln feed screw hopper, along with discharge cake from the kraft causti-
cizing mud filter.  Filtrate flows to the lift pump station to be repro-
cessed.

Carbonation Sludge Recovery.  Piping was arranged to deliver the recovered
calcium carbonate underflow from the carbonation clarifier to the causti-
cizing "mud" storage tank.  This would permit the combined calcium carbon-
ate sludges to be dewatered by the lime mud filter, which was generously
sized to provide the needed capacity to prepare the materials for calcin-
ing.

The Lime Kiln.  Design of the lime kiln was based upon the expected re-
quirements of the color removal system, combined with those for liquor
recausticizing for about 600 tons of kraft pulp production.  Kiln speci-
fications required a capacity of 235 tons of lime per day at 85% avail-
able calcium oxide.  Conditions for this performance included 45.2%
sludge solids, and a total dry solids load, including fiber and recir-
culated dust load, of 422 tons per day.  The indicated moisture load was
well above the expected level, to insure adequate chain section provision.
The kiln size was set at 290 feet by 12 feet inside shell diameter, with

                                   45

-------
6 inch refractory lining.   The successful  bidder provided a 58 foot chain
system, weighing 130,700 pounds.   Included was a venturi  scrubber for
stack gas, rated at 99% dust recovery, and an induced draft fan designed
to provide a 25 inch (water) pressure, while handling 101,500 ACFM at
400bF.

Kiln Gas Blower.  To supply lime  kiln stack gas to the carbonation system,
specifications were drawn  for a compressor having a capacity of 4,000 ACFM
at 160°F, at a discharge pressure of 10 psig. =Gas is received from the
discharge of the venturi scrubber system at a pressure of 1.0 atmosphere.

Since scrubber specifications indicated a CaC03 content of only 0.08%
by weight, bids were offered by manufacturers of rotary lobe-type compres-
sors, who represented their units as suitable.  These units were priced
lower than the "water-piston" type compressors, which the development en-
gineers had considered most suitable for the service.

Attention is called to subsequent findings concerning both the equipment
performance and the required gas  volume.

Instrumentation.  The needs for process instrumentation are largely in-
fluenced by three important considerations.  First, the system is an added
responsibility of the operator of another process, and the demands upon
his time should be limited.  Second, much of the equipment is relatively
remote from the normal location of operating people.  Third, the system
is ponderous and slow with respect to most functions and  responses.   The
last factor mitigates considerably the sophistication which might other-
wise be necessitated by the first two.

Control of the grit conveyor and disc screen system by a  timer and differ-
ential level sensor, respectively, has already been explained.

A level recorder in the control room, together with a "high level" annun-
ciator light, inform the operator concerning lift station performance.
The same level measurement is used to actuate a pump discharge valve so
as to maintain a constant level in the pit, maintaining pace with the
amount of effluent arriving.

Lime feed to the slaker is controlled by a manually-set speed control
governing the feed conveyor; the speed is monitored by an indicating
tachometer on the control  panel.   Water supply to the slaker is regulated
by an indicating flow controller.  Recording thermometers are provided for
water input and slurry overflow from the slakerj temperature rise .is a
measure of calcium hydroxide concentration of the product slurry.  (Con-
version of one pound of CaO to Ca(OH)2 releases 486 Btu.   Thus, production
of a 10% calcium hydroxide slurry is accompanied by a temperature rise of
about 380F.)  (20)
                                                                      ?
The lime slurry tank is provided with a level indicator-controller.  The
controller actuates a water valve to maintain a predetermined level in
the tank (usually about 6  feet).   Low water level will activate a relay  -

                                   46

-------
to shut off the slurry pump.  (The slurry pumps are also interlocked to
prevent function if all lift pumps are inactivated.)  Upon trip-out of
the slurry pump, a switch and timer provide flush-out of the slurry pip-
ing.

Torque exerted upon the rake of the color clarifier is recorded at the
control panel.  A separate limit switch is connected to an annuciator
light to signal "high torque."  Identical signals are provided at the
carbonation clarifier, and torque for both units is recorded on the same
2-pen instrument.

At the carbonation tank, pH measurement is indicated locally and trans-
mitted to a recorder-controller at the control panel.  A signal from the
controller actuates the control valve admitting kiln gas to the carbon-
ation system.  Both pH and valve position ("% open") are recorded on the
2-pen recorder.

Constant pressure in the kiln gas supply line, as well as protection
(pressure relief) of the compressor, are provided by a pressure controller
and vent valve.  A control panel station permits adjustment of pressure
and observation of valve position.

Control of pH at the outlet basin is facilitated by pH instrumentation
substantially identical to that for the carbonation vessel.

Control and recording of sludge flow from each clarifier to storage is
provided.  In each system, a magnetic flow meter signal is recorded, and
control action is supplied to a valve designed for precise flow control.
Because of the plugging hazard inherent in the sludge properties, a paral-
lel valve circuit with full pipe diameter, pneumatically-actuated plug
valve is installed; this unit can be positioned by a manual control on
the main panel.

The storage tank for color clarifier sludge is equipped with level mea-
surement.  This measurement is recorded, and connections to the annuncia-
tor panel activate alarms to warn of high or low levels.  A recorder to
display torque loading of the tank agitator paddles was planned, but a
suitable sensing element was not available.

Flow of sludge to the centrifuge is controlled and recorded by instrumen-
tation at the main panel.  To provide maximum uniformity of flow to the
centrifuge, a concentrically constricted, elastomer-sleeved valve ("sphinc-
ter valve") was desired.  Vendors were hesitant, lest the sludge prove too
abrasive for this type valve, so a stainless steel V-ball unit was used.

Torque load required to drive the internal conveyor to the centrifuge is
continuously recorded.  The signal for this measurement is an electrical
measurement of "percent excitation" of the eddy-current brake system pre-
viously ventioned.  A manually-set percent-excitation value (commonly 60 -
65%) will serve to interrupt sludge feed and flush the centrifuge, and at


                                   47

-------
95% of brake rating, the centrifuge motor would trip out.   Further details
of protective devices have been noted in description of the centrifuge.

Emergency Provisions.  To provide for short-term malfunctions  of the sys-
tem, including equipment failures or capacity overloads, as well  as for
shutdowns for changes, the arrangement shown in Figure 12  was  designed.
Flow in excess of pump capacity, or total flow if pumps are shut down,
can overflow to a holding pond.  Unacceptable product can  be diverted to
the same pond, as well as the contents of the clarifiers if they must be
emptied for maintenance activities.
                                   48

-------
-£>
VO
                              HOLDING
                              POND
                     OVERFLOW
                               GRIT
                               BASIN
                         f
          RAW  WASTE
                                                          DRAINS
COLOR REMOVAL
   PROCESS
                                                                                          TO
                                                                                          STREAM
BIO-
OXIDWON
SYSTEM
                            EMERGENCY FLOW SCHEME FOR  EFFLUENT
                                       Figure 12

-------
                               SECTION V

                   EQUIPMENT PERFORMANCE AND CHANGES
Grit and Trash Removal

The grit conveying system, as delivered by the vendor, had several  obvious
operational shortcomings.   Joints in the conveyor drag flight guides were
vulnerable to firm hanging against the ends of conveyor drags.   At  the
downstream extremity, these guides lacked the clearances necessitated by
the lateral movement permitted by the chain tracking variations. Shape
of these members encouraged jamming by sticks or large chips in the efflu-
ent.

During the early hours of trial running with low water levels (to facil-
itate visual operation), these deficiencies were identified.  The parts
were trimmed, shaped and bent to obtain suitable spacing and self-clearing
characteristics.

The conveyor flights are bolted to conveyor chain lugs, and a number of
loosened bolts were noted during early weeks of operation.  All nuts were
welded to the bolts to eliminate the obvious hazard involved.

After a few weeks of operation, conveyor drag flights exhibited notice-
able wear at the points of contact with steel wear strips in the bottom
of the grit basin.  A welded overlay of hard alloy was applied, and wear
has been reduced to an acceptable level.  It appears that several years
may elapse before these drag members must be replaced.

Subsequent performance has been largely trouble-free.  On occasion, the
over-night collection of settled material has exceeded considerably the
capacity of the 6 cu. yd.  refuse container.  Most of this material  would
have been harmless to the process system.  The most common type of  mater-
ial has been woody fragments which have been cut into granules  (rather
than defibered) by pulp refiners.  Even some defibered pulp settles out
under the conditions required for grit sedimentation.  Good in-plant
operation has usually been sufficient to keep the volume of settled ma-
terial below troublesome levels.

The disc screen, after some initial problems in correcting a badly-formed
seat for the rubber seal strip, has performed satisfactorily.  The  timing
control was designed to provide a minimum 3-minute cycle for the screen
and a longer period for the carry-off conveyor.  It was found that, after
the screen stopped, head loss across the screen would sometimes reach
switch-on point before the carry-off conveyor had completed its cycle.
Under such conditions, the timer system would not function until the man-
ual stop-start was actuated.  An electrical solution to the problem was
found.  However, it is felt the longer cycle for the conveyor is super-
flous, since the quantity of material on the conveyor would be  insuffi-


                                   50

-------
cient (after three minutes of screen rotation) to cause difficulty, even
under freezing conditions.

The disc screen has exhibited adequate hydraulic capacity, the one-half
inch drilling has provided the needed system protection, and the quantity
of debris collected has been so small as to present no problems.

Lift Station

The pumping station, as engineered, seems to be an adequate design.  How-
ever, experience with the pumps has emphasized the importance of stringent
and detailed specifications when low-bid acceptance is mandatory.  In par-
ticular, the pumps have required excessive maintenance attention to shaft
seals and to lower bearings.  The seals have been extensively modified to
counteract their tendency to loosen by turning in the direction of pump
rotation.

Lime Slurry System

The lime slaking and feeding system started without difficulty and oper-
ated as expected.  At first, the temperature rise of water from input to
output did not seem to correspond to the expected relation between volu-
metric flow rate and weight of lime added.  Analyses of slurry samples
yielded results which corresponded to the temperature rise but not to the
lime found in the receiving process; however, reproducibility of these
data was poor.  After several weeks of operation, it was discovered that
the water flow meter scale was incorrect.  The indicating scale was lin-
ear, while the instrument characteristic was logarithmic; also, full-
scale flow was twice the maximum scale indication.

When the correct scale was used, agreement was found between temperature
rise and hydrated lime content.  For the reaction,

                    CaO + HgO     » Ca(OH)2

heat release is 486 Btu per pound of CaO reacted.  (20)  Thus, slaking
lime to produce a slurry containing 10% calcium hydroxide (7.6% CaO)
will lead to a temperature rise of about 38°F.  If twelve million gallons
of effluent per day (8,333 g.p.m.) are to be treated with 1,000 mg/1 (w/w)
of CaO, the required slurry would be about 98 g.p.m. at a temperature rise
of 38°F.  It should be remembered that temperature differential reflects
CaO actually slaked, not lime feed to the slaker.

Control of lime feed to the slaker has been affected by two types of
mechanical problems.  The first was choking of the feed conveyor with
metal debris.  The chief source of such material was broken and detached
buckets from the lime bucket elevators, which were not adequate to the
demands of the heavy, hot-lime service, due to specifications which were
not sufficiently stringent in writing and/or interpretation.  The other
problem was performance of the variable-speed control on the feed screw.
This control functioned by shifting effective diameters of pulleys in a

                                   51

-------
belt-driven speed reducer.  Failures occurred in the small  motor which
controls the drive ratio.  Two solutions to the latter are:  (1) use of
a simple, manual-crank adjustment, or (2) a different or heavier-duty
speed controller (both more expensive).   Experience with this system
suggests the cheaper, manual system.  Only rarely have feed rates been
changed more than once during an 8-hour  operating shift.

During the early months of operation, little difficulty resulted from
omission of any device for heating the slaker water supply.  This might
be partially due to the frequent availability of recovered  process water
at about 140°F.; however, water at 80°F. was also used part of the time.
Later, periods occurred when slaking the incomplete and substantial
amounts of lime were rejected by the classifier rate.  It was usually
confirmed by other evidence that lime reactivity was low on these occa-
sions; commonly, the lime appeared "overburned", with hard, glazed pel-
lets.  Since such conditions will arise  occasionally, it was found de-
sirable to add a steam injection heater  ahead of the water  temperature
measurement.  By so controlling the heater that final slurry temperature
is kept below boiling, the temperature rise can still be used to monitor
lime feed.  (Obviously, at higher temperatures, heat loss will increase.)

There had been concern that the long lime slurry delivery pipe would be
plugged by solid lime deposits, since such experiences have been reported
from other milk-of-lime pumping systems.  However, the maintenance of
good flow velocity has apparently produced the designed effect; no plug-
ging of the main line has been observed.  Deposition has occurred at
three points in the slurry system:  in the gravity overflow pipe from
slaker to slurry tank, in the short suction piping to the slurry pumps,
and at the point of slurry introduction  into the mill effluent.  The
first two points represent low-velocity  conditions (one pump is normally
idle, with slurry in its suction pipe),  and the third is a  point at which
calcium carbonate formation occurs.  In  all three, the periods between
clean-outs has generally been three to five months.  Piping has been
arranged to facilitate quick punching out of the deposits.   On one occa-
sion, when there was a prolonged problem with low-reactivity lime, the
classifier compartment of the slaker became plugged.

Color Clarifier

The "primary" or "color" clarifier mechanism functioned with virtually
no difficulty, and with no outage for malfunction, throughout the 15
months service covered by this report.  (It was used for 3  months as a
conventional "primary" clarifier for mill effluent before start of the
year of color removal demonstration.) This was true despite a much
higher degree of sludge thickening and amount of sludge retention than
contemplated in design.  On one occasion, the torque switch, which was
set low at about 1,000,000 ft.-lbs. torque, was  tripped due to heavy
sludge load.  After about two hours, during which the torque switch was
reset, the mechanism re-started and remained in service.

Distribution and flocculation in the input compartment ("center well")

                                   52

-------
was satisfactory.  At the close of the demonstration period, head loss
measurements indicated some fouling of the inlet pipe, but the unit had
not been shut down for inspection.

The clarifier shell, with discharge ports, collection launder, and over-
flow control dams, displayed satisfactory hydraulic capacity and control.
Some fouling of discharge ports had required cleaning on two occasions.
The material involved in the fouling was soft (easily removed) and ap-
peared to be related to periods of inadequate lime dose, and to NSSC
components and dried foam from the carbonation system.  (This foam is
discussed elsewhere.)

Carbonation Tank

When the carbonation tank was filled and the gas flow began, the four
agitators were started, and the drive motors were found to be severely
overloaded.  The supplier of the agitators had warned that the motors
would overload if the agitators were run in ungassed water, but should
be within rating at normal gas flow.  Trials were made with various gas
flow rates to individual gas diffusers, and no condition was found which
effected any considerable reduction in motor load.  Each agitator had six
blades which were bolted to a hub.  By removing each alternate blade, the
unit was left with three symmetrically located blades.  With this change,
the motor load was found to be within a few percent of full horsepower
rating.  Little difference was found between gassed and ungassed oper-
ation.  Because of this last observation, it was possible to eliminate
an electrical interlock between agitator motors and gas blower.

After the first three days of operation (interrupted at this point for
other reasons), it was found that three of the four gas diffusers had
broken loose at the welded "legs" which had secured them to the tank
bottom.  This occurrence is an indication of the violent turbulence
which exists in the carbonator.  Each diffuser was then welded to four
new legs made of 3" x 3" heavy angle iron.  The legs were full-perimeter
welded to the tank bottom, and each was double-welded along a 3-inch
contact with the diffuser.  No further trouble was experienced with these
anchors.

After about 50 - 60 days of actual operation, the interior of the carbon-
ator was inspected.  The agitator blades were covered with a hard scale
of calcium carbonate which ranged up to more than one inch thickness.
The diffusers were also coated with about one-half inch of scale along
the lower edges, so that the serrations in the metal edges were largely
rounded over.  Scale on the agitator's shaft (steel) and gas supply pipe
(stainless steel) was rather thin and showed evidence of intermittent
flaking.  The vertical tank wall had a deposit about 3/4" thick, which
was soft enough to be scraped away with a thumb nail.  Scale on the agi-
tator blades and diffuser edges was hammered off in about twenty minutes.
It was subsequently found desirable to repeat this removal about once
per month.  Other deposits in the tank proved self-limiting and have
caused no serious trouble.

                                   53

-------
The tank was originally provided with two round vent stacks of 24" dia-
meter.  Soon after operation began, it became apparent that the exit
gas velocity was sufficient to entrain any froth, with scant opportunity
for water showers to break the bubbles.   Substituting two 30" square
stacks (approximately doubling the cross-sectional area)  improved the
situation, but at times foam emission was still a nuisance.  The possi-
bility of foam problems had been foreseen prior to construction, and
there had been discussion of a mechanical foam breaker or a foam tower
as potential devices to deal with foam.   The expelled foam was observed
to be heavy, wet and laden with calcium carbonate.  A temporary expedient,
which would give opportunity to examine behavior of the foam, was decided
upon.  A horizontal, 20" diameter pipe was run from the lower portion of
one vent stack (total height,.8 feet) across the outer wall of the color
clarifier.  Water level was more than a foot below the top of the clari-
fier, providing capacity for a substantial volume of foam.  It was found
that the foam spread and decayed rapidly in contact with  air.  Any cal-
cium carbonate or other solid matter was trapped and recovered by the
clarifier.  Although the partially-dried foam residue was unattractive
in appearance, an adequate foam disposal was provided, and the usage has
been continued.

After about four months service, a blade-mount stub on one agitator hub
broke, apparently as a result of metal fatigue.  A similar breakage was
experienced the following month; this time, the break occurred at night,
and before it was discovered, the resulting vibration wrecked the reduc-
tion gear housing.  One additional hub failure was recorded during the
first year of operation.  During this period, there were  two gear replace-
ments due to broken gear teeth.

Toward the close of the year of operation covered by this report, some
limitations in hydraulic flow capacity of the carbonator  were observed.
One observation indicated a change in the system; another resulted from
increased volume handled, revealing a latent problem.  In the first in-
stance, it was found that scale formation in the discharge pipe was re-
stricting outflow from the carbonator.  The other case involved input
flow:  at higher throughput, an unexpectedly high liquid  level was de-
veloped in the color clarifier outlet compartment.  It appears that de-
sign was based upon liquid entry at the surface of water (specific gra-
vity = 1.0), whereas in operation the liquid is gassed to a density of
about 0.8 and rises some two feet higher.  (Introducing flow at bottom
of the carbonator would obviate the effect of gassing.)

Gas Blowers

The carbonation tank is supplied with lime kiln stack gas by a Rbots-
Connersville blower (or compressor -- output pressure is  5 - 10 psig)
rated at 4,000 ACFM.  Within the first several days of operation, this
unit became the object of two serious concerns.

The first concern related to suitability of the equipment to the service
demands.  Bearings and seals required replacement at this time.  Although

                                   54

-------
examination indicated the failure was due to corrosion damage while the
unit was idle between manufacture and start-up, several maintenance pro-
blems could be seen.  Dust and scale accumulations fapparently calcium
carbonate, chiefly) were already evident, and the seals seemed quite
vulnerable to the effect of such solid material.  Replacement of seals
requires almost complete dismantling of the machine, and we have found
it preferable (based on outage time) to move the entire unit to the plant
machine shop.
                             i
Other seal failures have occurred, signalled by the appearance of water
in the oil circulating system, with subsequent trip-out of the oil pres-
sure switch.  On one occasion, one of the head castings was cracked by
pressure exerted by dust accumulations.  There have also been problems
re-starting the blower after it has been shut down for a short time; this
was attributed to scale accumulations on the rotor lobes and housing.
(Cooling reduced clearance below that required for free rotation.)  Occa-
sional injection of light fuel oil into the blower intake has reduced the
scaling problem somewhat.

The second concern about the blower had to do with capacity.  Even though
effluent throughput during early operation was far below design flow rate,
the gas supply was barely sufficient for carbonation at peak demand.  This
raised questions about the adequacy of design specifications.

To test the needs versus performance of the system, chemical analyses of
gas and liquid flows were studied.  During the early months of operation,
it was found that the kiln gas was being diluted by air intrusion through
a defective labyrinth seal between the kiln and the feed-end housing.   The
result was a C02 concentration of only 9 - 12% (dry basis).  When the kiln
seal.was repaired, in the closing days of 1971, C02 concentration rose to
a level of 16 - 17% (at minimum ratios of combustion air to the kiln).
Exit gases from the carbonation varied in C02 concentration, depending
upon pH of the liquid phase; however, the concentration was normally below
1.5% for pH above 10.0.

Carbon dioxide demand involves one factor which was not weighed adequately
in design considerations.  Much of the sodium content of raw waste is pre-
sent as sodium-organic materials or sodium bicarbonate, which are involved
in calcium precipitation reactions which produce sodium hydroxide, which
in turn consumes carbon dioxide to reach normal carbonation pH; even more
is needed for neutralization prior to bio-oxidation.

Review of the calculations of required kiln gas flow rate indicates three
contributors to a low estimate.  Soda alkalinity was one.  Variations of
calcium alkalinity above average estimates were not provided for.  The
third, and most serious, appears to be the assumption of kiln gfas composi-
tion based upon fuel oil (carbon.-hydrogen ratio of 1:2) instead of natural
gas (carbon:hydrogen ratio of 1:4); no provision was made for variations
from optimum sludge loading or fuel:air ratios.

Arrangements have been made to replace the blower with two  units  of the

                                    55

-------
"water piston" type, having a combined capacity of 6,000 ACFM.   The
choice of type is based upon generally lower maintenance requirement
and up-time as well as a lower vulnerability to dust content of the
gas.  In the latter regard, it should be noted that the normal  dust
content is very low because of the excellent venturi scrubber;  however,
momentary interruptions of scrubber function will  entail  substantial
dust loadings.

One further note on the kiln gas supply system has to do with the pres-
sure requirements for carbonation.  The system was designed for a working
pressure of 10 psig, with the expectation that normal back-pressure of
the system would approach 80% of this value.  Actual performance has in-
volved full-flow pressure of about 5 psig.   The cloud of gas bubbles
above the gas diffusers, coupled with the flow induction of the turbine
agitators, appear to result in discharge conditions more favorable than
the calculated static pressure of the carbonation  vessel.

Carbonation Clarifier        ,

The second clarifier has functioned with no mechanical  difficulties and
no maintenance attention except routine lubrication.  It had been ex-
pected that considerable torque would be developed if sludge withdrawal
were not so controlled as to avoid large accumulations  of sludge.  It
was assumed that the calcium carbonate produced in the  carbonation step
would behave similarly to that from kraft mill recausticizing;  caustici-
zing "mud" will settle to a dense cake which (at consistencies  around
50% solids) can immobilize clarifier mechanisms.  On the other  hand, the
sludge collected in the carbonation clarifier has  not readily thickened
beyond 25% consistency4 and has poured from a sample container  after
sitting overnight.  As a result of the sludge properties, torque devel-
oped by the clarifier drive mechanism has never exceeded 15% of the de-
sign rating.

Clarification performance of the unit has been less uniformly satisfac-
tory.  Losses of calcium carbonate in the clarifier effluent have ranged
from 2% to 70%.  The highest values have been associated with the pre-
sence of organic compounds high in ratio of NSSC-to-kraft origin, or
with inadequate lime treatment.  However, not all  poor performance has
been readily explainable in this manner.  Efforts  to improve retention
by sludge recirculation -- either into the carbonator or into the clari-
fier influent — have not yielded significant results.   Flocculation
tests with polyelectrolytes by "jar test" techniques, using samples from
the clarifier center well, have not provided a solution to the  problem.
Visual observation of these tests does not indicate that the problem
would have been eliminated by a moderate reduction in design rise rate.

Some scaling of the input pipe to the clarifier has been noted.  It is
believed this deposition is due largely to the frequently marginal com-
pleteness of carbonation, due to inadequate carbon dioxide supply.
                                   56

-------
Outlet Basin

The outlet basin receives the output flow from the carbonation clarifier,
and the connecting pipe has caused some minor annoyance which suggests
an improvement in piping design.  Liquid level in the outlet basin is
more than ten feet below that at the clarifier outlet; from the clarifier,
the pipe extends several feet horizontally and then the effluent passes
through a standard pipe elbow bend into a vertical pipe to another ell
which directs flow into the basin below normal water level.  Such a pipe
configuration entrains large amounts of air and causes considerable splash-
ing and may produce foam.

A chief function of the basin is to provide post-carbonation of effluent
to reduce pH to a level compatible with subsequent bio-oxidation or in-
plant re-use.  The perforated pipe gas diffuser functioned well for a few
weeks while enough C02 was provided for adequate carbonation plus pH ad-
justment.  When carbonation became marginal, scaling of holes in the pipe
began.  It is felt the diffuser will be generally satisfactory when the
gas supply problem is resolved.

Sludge Pumps

The pumps originally purchased to handle color clarifier underflow sludge
were Morris Model 3JC14, a high-head sludge pump represented as capable
of handling 1-1/4 inch spherical solids.  When the clarifier (with the
pumps) was put in service as a conventional primary clarifier, before the
start of lime treatment of the installation of the disc screen, the pump
intake quickly clogged with bark, wood slivers and pulp.  A Morris 4 HS
pump was borrowed to substitute for one of the original pumps and worked
well in this interim, moderate-head service.  The 4 HS pump as an impeller
deeply recessed from the head (a style often described in the industry as
a "trash pump"), providing high tolerance to rough solids, with a sacri-
fice of horsepower efficiency.  The working head rating is 140', compared
with 170' for the original pump.

When the entire system was completed and lime treatment begun, the re-
maining 3JC14 pump was again tried.  When sludge consistency rose to a
desirable range, recurrent choking at the pump suction was observed.  The
difficulty no longer seemed to be with coarse debris, but with rheological
properties of the normal process sludge, which offered excessive flow
resistance at the restricted inlet opening and led to cavitation at the
impeller.  On the other hand, the Model 4 HS pump worked quite satisfac-
torily, even though the sludge consistency averaged (contrary to earlier
expectations) above 15% solids for monthly periods and exceeded 20% for
several consecutive days.  Often, the sludge required shaking to empty
it from a 4-inch diameter cylindrical sample cup.  (The pumping distance
is over 650' through 6" pipe, terminating through a 4" magnetic flowmeter
and 3" control valve.  Intake is through about 90' of 8" pipe, with about
19'  static suction head.)
                                   57

-------
The 1-1/2 JC14 pumps provided for the carbonation clarifier were also
the source of some problems.  When sludge accumulated in the clarifier,
consistency would increase to about 20% solids; under this condition,
the pumps would frequently fail to pump.  Only by dilution could flow
be maintained, although the concentrated sludge appeared very fluid;
apparently the slurry is somewhat dilatant, and effective viscosity
rises sharply at high shear rates at the restricted intake orifice of
the pump.  A 3JC14 unit removed from color sludge service was substituted
for one of the pumps and has been used satisfactorily whenever sludge con-
sistency was high.

The rubber-lined Galigher pumps which deliver color sludge to the centri-
fuge have worked reasonably well.  The pumping system, which includes
flow-control instrumentation with V-ball control  valve, has been subject
to flow-rate oscillations which are not desirable in a centrifuge oper-
ation.  It is uncertain whether pump or valve is  chiefly responsible; it
has been suggested that a positive, progressing-cavity pump might provide
better performance.  However, there have not been enough difficulties to
justify a change.

Carbonation Sludge Disposition

When lime treatment was begun and initial sludge  pump problems resolved,
some carbonation sludge was pumped to the recausticizing mud tank.  There
was no clear evidence that the new sludge altered filtration character-
istics of the "mud" (nor certainty that it did not).  Due to impurity
load already in the system, in combination with causticizing equipment
difficulties, the precoat filter was already unable to handle the existing
load.  The new liquid volume simply added to system losses.

To relieve this situation, at least temporarily,  the carbonation sludge
was diverted to the color clarifier input pipe.  As expected, there was
no noticeable change in clarification or color reduction.  The change did
involve an increase by 50 - 100% in the insolubles mass imposed upon the
centrifuge, and the sludge thickened to a greater density.  Torque load-
ing on the color clarifier rakes was not markedly increased, and the cen-
trifuge was able to tolerate the total sludge load.  Since the arrangement
proved workable and filter limitations continued, the change has remained
in use.

Color Sludge Storage

The agitator mechanism of the color sludge storage tank was soon found to
be much less effective in the sludge suspension than an identical unit
handling recausticizing mud.  When the tank was more than half full, a
watery surface layer appeared, and when the tank was held 75% filled, with
no addition or withdrawal, the torque increased until the drive mechanism
overloaded.  Even at low levels (30 - 40% full),  solids caked along the
lower walls of the tank, and performance of the withdrawal pumping system
(to centrifuge) gave evidence of dense masses occasionally breaking loose.
                                   .58

-------
After a consultation with mixing specialists, a supplementary, side-
entering propeller mixer was installed at a level which did not interfere
with the radial arms of the original agitator.  The new mixer fully loaded
a 20 HP motor.  Located almost directly above the outlet pipe, the mixer
has largely eliminated trouble from sludge lumps (although some deposits
form on other areas of the tank periphery), and the tank can be filled
without agitator overload or appreciable stratification of sludge.

Centrifuge

At start of operations, dewatering effectiveness of the Sharpies solid-
bowl centrifuge surpassed expectations.  Since pilot-plant work indicated
that every effort would be required to attain 25 - 28% consistency in the
discharge cake, a low pond setting was employed.  At some sacrifice of
liquid retention time (expecting a consequent loss of centrate clarity),
this setting provides a maximum drainage time for cake as it emerges from
the liquid and is transported (by conveyor scroll action) up the "beach"
comprising the conical discharge section of the centrifuge bowl.  The
first days of operation yielded cake at more than 40% solids.

After less than three days of operation, a centrifuge universal joint
broke.  Two universal joints connect the eddy-current brake with the
differential spindle of the conveyor planetary gear box.  (By controlled
restraint of spindle rotation, the eddy-current brake regulates speed
differential between the centrifuge bowl and the internal screw conveyor.)
With failure of the universal joint, conveyor action ceased.  The failure
was not immediately detected, so sludge feed continued, with water being
expelled while sludge solids accumulated within the bowl.  Because of
operator inexperience in detecting and diagnosing this type of occurrence,
and failure to initiate prompt flushing and cleaning action, the conveyor
became so tightly jammed that a screw flight was bent before removal was
finally effected.  During the next few weeks of intermittent system oper-
ation, two more universal joints failed, and there were a number of cen-
trifuge trip-outs because of transient peaks in conveyor torque.  By
means of a drive pulley change, the centrifuge was slowed from 2,450 to
2,300 RPM; plate dams were changed to increasd "pond" level within the
bowl; and a 5-second time delay was introduced into the high-torque trip-
out switch wiring.  With these changes, together with improved operator
skills, satisfactory operation was soon established and continued for
over two months before another universal joint failure.

During the following five months, universal joint failures gradually grew
in frequency.  It was noted that the difficulties were related to periods
of high pulp fiber content in the sludge.  Representatives of the centri-
fuge manufacturer, who worked closely with project personnel, had analyzed
the problem as a "chattering" effect, involving rapid variations in con-
veyor torque, which result in metal fatigue.  This conclusion was dra-
matically confirmed when a direct torque-arm restraint eliminating the
cushioning effect of the eddy-current brake, was temporarily installed on
the spindle shaft.  Violent (and frighteningly loud) vibration quickly
tripped the safety release.

                                    59

-------
The manufacturer's engineers now concluded that consolidation of the cake
in the centrifuge bowl was leading to a situation in which large areas
were alternately seizing and releasing as a unit, instead of rolling up
locally along the edges of the conveyor scroll.  They arranged to ex-
change the original conveyor for a new one with an altered scroll config-
uration.  The effect of the change was a dramatic improvement.  Torque
indication dropped substantially and improved in uniformity.  During the
following three months, which concluded the demonstration period here
reported, there were no further mechanical failures attributed to this
problem.

The original feed tube design provided with the centrifuge was a double-
wall stainless steel unit which would permit use of flocculating additives
(such use was never found necessary).  There were several occasions of
brittle fracture of these tubes.  Substitution  of a simplified tube design
of mild steel seems to have avoided further failures.

The numerous protective circuits provided for the centrifuge (previously
listed) have been the source of frequent interruptions of centrifuge oper-
ation.  Some of the interruptions have been legitimate warnings of hazards,
such as an unreliable cooling water supply pressure to serve the eddy-
current brake.  The high-torque trip was found  to be responding to tran-
sient peaks for which its response was not helpful; a time delay provided
a better control.  However, there have been many spurious alarm signals.
Trouble-shooting efforts have not clarified all of the problems; it appears
that much can be attributed to a sophisticated  and sensitive system oper-
ated in a humid and dirty environment,  Relocation and protection of com-
ponents is planned.

One control need which was not provided was a protective response in case
conveyor action is interrupted, either by brake failure or by mechanical
failure in the back-drive train (such as a universal joint).  A planned
addition is a relay to discontinue sludge feed whenever torque approaches
zero.

One of the most commonly activated protective systems has been one to
respond to rising torque load to interrupt sludge feed and inject flush
water to prevent reaching the trip-out point.  Since sludge feed rate is
automatically controlled, an over-riding flow interruption distorts con-
trol action so that, when flow resumes, a brief period of cyclic over-
response occurs.  This has often triggered a repetition of the high-torque
condition.  To replace the use of a blocking valve to stop flow, a new
piping arrangement has been designed to switch  flow to a recirculation
line; thus constant flow rate is maintained through the control loop.  The
new flow system is shown in Figure 13.

Centrifuge performance includes, in addition to cake dewatering, the
clarity of the centrate.  Since centrate is returned to the raw waste
input, solids are not lost.  However, if large proportions of the most
troublesome solids are discharged with the centrate, they may be repeat-
edly recirculated until they accumulate to a quantity which cannot be

                                   60

-------
                   -M-
                         COLOR
                         SLUDGE
                         TANK
CENTRIFUGE FLOW MODIFICATION
Figure 13
                  61

-------
contained.  It was therefore a matter of some concern when it was first
observed that centrate consistency was sometimes more than 25% of the
feed sludge consistency.  At best, it was feared that polyelectrolyte
flocculation aids would be required.  However, no serious problem
has arisen.  Solids recovery by the centrifuge varied from 70% to
98% in a rather random time frame, with no evident cyclic pattern.

Successful sludge dewatering was one of the most critical engineering
risks undertaken in embarking on the project.  It now seems that the
centrifuge application was a sound concept, and that persistent effort
and cooperation by supplier and user have achieved a creditable
working application.

Lime Kiln

Introduction of centrifuge sludge cake into the lime kiln has produced
no evident problems except the obvious load limitations due to the
moisture demands upon fuel and capacity.  When the waste treatment
sludge addition is started or stopped, there are no conspicuous
differences in appearance of the product.  When the kiln has been
operated with this sludge alone for several hours, there have been  no
unusual observations.  There have been a variety of problems in kiln
operation, but all seem independent of whether waste treatment sludge
was being processed.  The original chain system installed in the kiln
appears to have been more than adequate; it has now been shortened
by burning back at the hot end.  There has been some feeling that dust
recirculation is higher with the effluent treatment sludge, but no  data
have yet shown clearly that this is so.

Instrumentation

In general, the instrument scheme has been found conceptually valid with
the exception of some details of the centrifuge protective provisions
and the disc screen control, both of which have been discussed in
connection with the operation of the respective process equipment units.

One deficiency might be noted in the sizing of the control valve for
sludge flow from the color clarifier to the color sludge storage tank
(FV-014 on the instrument loop sheets).  This 3" valve body with 2"
trim has a very high pressure drop for a lengthy piping system which
already presents a difficult pumping load, and there is no severe demand
for narrow flow deviation.  A standard 4" V-ball control valve would seem
preferable and should avoid the frequent choke-ups which have required
use of the 6" by-pass valve, which is too large for convenient manual
control.  (However, it has worked!)

One disappointing area of performance has been the pH instrumentation.
Although some of the problems were due to calcium carbonate scaling of
electrodes in the carbonation control system (see below), the pH measur-
ing circuits themselves have performed rather poorly.  The problems


                                   62          '

-------
include standardization drift, non-linear response, and generally erratic
behavior.  In addition there has been frequent non-agreement between pri-
mary (transmitter) and remote indications.

As previously noted, calcium carbonate scaling -- of electrodes and of
sample piping -- have been a problem in the carbonation pH system.   The
problem has been controlled by piping which can be easily, quickly and
regularly rodded free of deposits.  The electrode assembly, provided
with flexible cable, can be readily lifted out of the chamber so that
the electrodes can be cleaned with hydrochloric acid squirted from a
squeeze-bottle.  The sampling configuration is shown in Figure 14.
                                    63

-------
                    pH ELECTRODE
                        ASSEMBLY
                        CLEAN-OUT  CKPS
CARBONATION  TANK
FLOW SAMPLER FOR pH PROBE
Figure 14

                64

-------
                               SECTION VI

                           PROCESS PERFORMANCE

General Operating Considerations.

The Continental Can Company mill at Hodge, Louisiana produces unbleached
kraft pulp (primarily pine) and a smaller amount of neutral sulfite semi-
chemical (NSSC) hardwood pulp with "cross-recovery" whereby spent NSSC
liquors are processed in the kraft recovery system.  During the demonstra-
tion period covered by this report, paper machine output averaged about
750 tons per day.  Typically, NSSC corrugating medium (79% NSSC, 21%
kraft) was produced at about 300 tons per day during three periods each
month, totaling 10 days.  Thus, a month might include 8 days (rarely over
3 consecutive days) of 30 - 40% NSSC pulp consumption, 17 days (seldom
over 7 consecutive days) of all-kraft production, and 5 days involving
transition.  Because of the varied product mix of the mill, daily pro-
duction varied widely between 600 and 900 tons.

Effects of NSSC pulping upon effluent properties has been accentuated
by the fact that, while kraft pulp washing performance at the Hodge mill
was well above industry average, the NSSC washing facilities were much
less effective.  (Improvements were under construction, but not completed
during this period.)  As a result, NSSC contributions to effluent color
were disproportionately large, compared to tonnage ratios.  The varied
production rates of the mill (noted above) also result in variations in
the concentration of kraft components of the effluent.

Mill water use averaged around 12 million gallons daily (8,300 g.p.m.).
Throughput of the color removal system was typically 6,000 - 7,000 g.p.m.
Wastes from power plant, causticizing area, bag manufacturing and by-
products processing were excluded from plans for the system.  Some waste
water from the evaporator and recovery furnace area was not treated be-
cause needed sewer changes had not been completed.  Liquid contents of
each of the clarifiers is about 1,600,000 gallons above the settled
sludge, so that the theoretical total detention time of the two clari-
fiers was around eight hours.  However, in these deep clarifiers, the
characteristic liquid travel is far from "plug" flow, and this fact will
have sybstantial effects on concentration/time gradients through the
system.

After some early attempts to establish a program of sampling to follow
time lag through the system, a uniform daily sampling procedure (based
on convenience) was adopted.  Raw waste, and the overflow effluents from
the two clarifiers were sampled by three continuous samplers from which
24-hour composites were gathered at the start of each working day.  The
raw waste was sampled by a 75ml dipper which was energized at flow-
proportional  intervals; this type sampler was chosen .to assure true sam-
pling of fiber content and to minimize interference of trash.  The clari-
fier outputs  were sampled with diaphragm-type metering pumps.  "Grab"
                                   65

-------
samples of sludges, lime and lime slurry were gathered at the same time,
as were process instrument data.

The operational project, as just outlined, offers  some impressive ad-
vantages, and also presents some limitations  for conducting a technical
evaluation study.  Among the advantages:

     1.  The plant's operational  and waste disposal  programs were
         firmly committed to the project, assuring motivation for
         successful operation.

     2.  The day-to-day variability of the effluent tested the
         capabilities of the process under a  very wide variety of
         conditions.

     3.  Unpredictability of some process demands  placed many problems
         in the hands of operating crews revealing adaptability to
         "real world" resources.

     4.  The scale of the operation and the length of the demonstration
         period eliminated many of the questions commonly inherent in
         experimental operations.

Among the limitations encountered:

     1.  It was not possible to develop fixed experimental  programs
         under constant conditions to afford  ideal statistical  bases
         for evaluation.  Indeed, the variability  of conditions
         necessitates much selectivity in data handling to determine
         some of the desired relationships.  The time lag and mixing
         effects (for example)  necessitate consideration of the
         previous day's parameters in evaluating an item of output
         quality data.

     2.  Capacity of equipment, and the necessity of handling all mill
         output, sometimes limit the exploration of significant ranges
         of key variables.

     3.  Because of the size and cost of some equipment components,
         system alterations require much time.  Even with the most
         expeditious handling,  procurement of some large items
         may require several months.

     4.  Some transient input parameters cannot be evaluated because
         the response peaks are so greatly attenuated by in-process
         mixing.

Start-Up and Operation.

Full-scale lime treatment was begun on August 18,  1971 and continued


                                    66

-------
in promising fashion for three days before it was  interrupted  for more
than a week by a mechanical  failure (which has been discussed  elsewhere)
Reasonably continuous operation was established in very early  October.
Except for 10 days for holidays and repairs and alteration  work  in
December, and 7 days lost in January because of lime kiln problems,
general system up-time has been above 93%. 'The great majority of the
lost time has been due to problems with lime kiln, lime conveyors and
(to a lesser degree) kiln gas compressor.

During operation of the system, lime feed to the slaker has been
maintained almost 93% of the time.  The lime interruptions  involved  in
this calculation ranged from several minutes to a few hours, and they
were largely due to conveyor problems and to clogging at the outlet  of
the lime supply bin.  The record by months is shown in Table 19.

During all of this operating period a comprehensive monitoring program
was maintained.  A sample of the daily data sheet is pictured  in Figure
15.  Monthly tabulations of raw data are presented in Appendix D.  The
test methods are found in Appendix C.  A preliminary summary of  the
early months of operation has been published previously.  (21)

                                TABLE 19

                       TREATMENT SYSTEM UP-TIME

                                                 Lime Feed, %  of
         Month              Flow Up-Time, %       Flow Up-Time

     October 1971 (29 days)      100                   91
     November                    100                   96
     December (21 days)          100                   96
     January 1972 (24 days)       86                   83
     February        '             99                   95
     March                        85                   88
     April                        91                   93
     May                          82                   97
     June                         95                   93
     July                         91                   96
     August                       95                   91

Effluent Effects.
Reduction of effluent color, as measured in daily composite samples,
has varied widely, ranging up to above 95% reduction.  Although some
of the occasions of poor color removal have not been associated with
any recognized process aberration, most of the data can be explained
by identifiable factors.  The two most conspicuous factors have been
inadequate lime addition and the presence of a high ratio of color
derived from NSSC process wastes.  There have been a few occasions when
color sludge appeared in the overflow of the color clarifier and was


                                    67

-------
                               MILL OPERATIONS DIVISION of
                              CONTINENTAL CAN COMPANY, INC.
                                    HOD3S, LOUISIANA
                                   COLOR REMOVAL DATA
Date
                                                                9"/"
PH
Color
TOG
Alk.
CaO
Na*
S3
Flow
Haw 'waste
s,z
840

2.2>J
c/Mo
i
3 XX
11, °i
l.Lt<\
To Final Primary
Carbonator Clarifier Centerwell
/£.5L 1C. 4 J&.Z
$2 /06s-
/37
/% JO4O
pnm Na^SOf^ 7'«^" weq/1
Fiber, Hi* DS I RAW
Turb
From
Carbonator
10.$
340

WASTS, Hrs.j

Outlet
Basin
9-f

&3  Spindle RPM /flgjQ  Fiber ^

         Kick-offs & V«'hy
  UyJS FrSD: Hour s ^JLJ. Avg . Flov /S'j. Ft . Stor . ? AM    •_, Sewered?
SLUD3S SOLIDS: FoedJJ^S. CakejS'.l $1  Ash.Sy.Oj8. Centrate^- i.J. Scrub Water32, g/1.

pH RECORD3KS: Carbonation pH /Q.£.  Valve  Pos.'yoJa. Hours over 11 Z.  i below 9.5.V

             Outlet Basin pH /fi^,,  Valve  Pos.  Q  ..
              «.4
E1.S 6/?2a
             DAILY  DATA WORK  SHEET   (Sample)

                                           68
                   Figure  15

-------
partially re-dissolved.  There appear to be a larger number of days on
which lime feed was interrupted one or more times and, although the
average lime feed was adequate, some of the color clarifier output dur-
ing the day had received lower dosages.

Average color reduction for all days of system operation during the last
eleven months of the demonstration period was 70%.  If only the days
of 100% kraft production (i.e., when no NSSC effluent was involved) are
considered, the average color reduction was 80%.

Direct measurement of lime addition to the system was not precise enough
for proper evaluation, so the selected indicator of lime treatment has
been the soluble calcium content of the liquid overflowing the color
clarifier.  Indeed, theoretical considerations support the conclusion
that this parameter is the prime determinant of color precipitation.  Upon
examining the data representing 40 days on which color reduction was above
88%, it was observed that, in virtually every case, the soluble calcium
at the color clarifier had been 400 mg/1 or more.  Separate tabulations
of data for kraft effluent and effluent including NSSC wastes were plotted
to show the relation between percent color reduction and calcium ion con-
centration.  A most-probable curve was then drawn for each set.  These
curves are shown in Figure 16 and 17.

Throughout the demonstration period, it has been noted that the average
color of water samples taken at the color clarifier outlet has been lower
than that of samples taken at the carbonation clarifier outlet.  For the
total period, this difference has amounted to an increase of about 25% in
color after the first clarifier.  The effect on this color difference
on calculated color removal efficiency, for both all-kraft and NSSC-
containing effluent is shown in the monthly averages listed in Table 20.

                               TABLE 20

          COLOR REDUCTION BEFORE AND AFTER LIME RECOVERY

                       All-Kraft               With NSSC
       Month      Beforea      Afterb      Beforea      Afterb
     October       83.3%       WM        70.0%       64.8%
     November      85.1        82.1         61.7        58.6
     December      85.7        83.1         64.3        57.9
     January       78.0        73.5         67.7        64.1
     February      89.6        82.1         69.2        64.0
     March         84.6        76.6         73.6        67.7
     April         87.9        79.4         78.6        70.7
     May           82.0        79.2         73.6        63.2
     June          88.6        85.9         71.2        65.5
     July          86.1        84.0         75.8        68.1
     August        83.4        74.3         71.3        66.8
aSampled at outlet of color clarifier.
bSampled at outlet of carbonation clarifier.
Percentage based on raw waste color.

                                   69

-------
   fOOI-
o

t~
o
ZD
O
LLJ
CL
60-
O 40
                     200
                          3oo
      DISSOLVED
                                    CaO
     SOLUTION CaO versus COLOR REMOVAL (KRAFT)
                                           Figure 16
                          70

-------
   •joo
2
o

n
OJ
u
100
                      200      300



                   DISSOLVED CA, ^/JL CaO
  SOLUTION CaO versus COLOR REMOVAL (WITH NSSC)
                                      Figure 17
                             71

-------
There has been much speculation about the cause of this color increase.

Possibilities suggested have included:

     1.  Difference in chemistry of pH adjustment.

     2.  Sample storage at different pH and calcium levels.

     3.  Effect of unknown component of kiln gas.

The first possibility has been ruled out, but the  cause is still  not
known.  Further work is planned.

The reduction in total organic carbon (TOC) content of the effluent
has appeared subject to the same factors as color  reduction.   When per-
cent reduction is plotted against soluble calcium, there is much  more
scatter of data points.  The scatter is believed to reflect a variable
ratio of lignin to saccharides in the effluent. The low molecular weight
soluble saccharides are largely unaffected by lime treatment.  Curves re-
presenting data plots for all-kraft and NSSC-containing effluents are
shown in Figure 18 and Figure 19.  The data suggest  that increased sol-
uble calcium concentrations beyond 400 mg/1 CaO will effect a greater
proportional reduction in TOC than in color.  Average reduction in TOC
for eleven months was 37%.

In correlating data on color and TOC, it was assumed at first that graphs
relating the two would pass through zero on both co-ordinate axes.  On
this basis, it appeared the data yielded different slope lines for efflu-
ents with NSSC, as compared to all-kraft.  However, closer examination
indicated an intercept on the TOC axis at a value  between 50 and  100 for
the average of the data compiled in this project.   Treating the data
according to this hypothesis yielded an equation:

                 TOC = K + 0.19 (Color Units),

which would apply to both groups.  This positive,  minimum value for TOC
seems to reflect the fact that some lignin is precipitated by alum in
kraft papermaking.  Graphs reflecting project data for TOC and color
are shown in Figure 20 and Figure 21.

The effect of lime treatment on BODs was one which did not bear out the
promise of bench scale and pilot studies.  A reduction of about 30 - 35%
in BODs nad been expected, but no more than about  12% has been indicated
by plant data.  Meaningful information is not available for the full
demonstration period, since sample collection during early months was
found to be accompanied by enough bio-oxidation before testing to distort
the results.

Fiber content of the raw waste ranged upward from  125 mg/1 {24-hour
average), and averaged about 300 mg/1.  No levels  were encountered which
appeared to have any adverse effect on color removal.

                                   72

-------
  100
  8o
§
u
13
Q
UJ
  40-
0
o
.0*0
              I
I
I
             too


             DISSOLVED
        300


   Ca   MS/L  as
   SOLUTION Cad versus TOC  REDUCTION  (KRAFT)
                          Figure  18
                          73

-------
   40
z
o
h-

^0
               I
I
              fOO       200      3OO



               DISSOLVED     Ca
                  400      50O


                 L   as   Ca0
    SOLUTION CaO versus TOC REDUCTION  (WITH NSSC)
                            'Figure 19
                               74

-------
   ,500
I
U
O
   2 oo
   ICQ
                         I
                        jooo
<20oo
                    COLOR, APHA   UNITS
        .COLOR - TOC RELATIONSHIP (KRAFT)
           Figure 20
                             75

-------
   •JOOO-
   300
   (BOO
o
H
   2.00
             JQOO    2,000    3®°°     4000


                COLOR,  APHA  UNITS
     COLOR - TOC RELATIONSHIP (WITH NSSC)
Figure 21
                           76

-------
Clarification, Carbonatlon and Sludge Handling.

Clarity of color clarifier effluent has been excellent when adequate
lime has been applied to kraft wastes.  NSSC effluents sometimes have
a slightly turbid appearance, although they are free of settleable solids,
The only evidences of solids carry-over have been due to accumulation of
excessive sludge volume in the clarifier.  These occasions have resulted
from sludges which did not thicken to the usual degree; the low rake
torque which resulted was misinterpreted as indicating low sludge level,
and sludge withdrawal rate was not adequate.

Sludge withdrawn from the color clarifier has averaged above 14% solids
and has ranged from 9% to above 22%.  The highest consistencies have
been associated with high ratios of calcium carbonate, while the lowest
consistencies have usually been related to high fiber ratio.  Some of
the variation has not been explained by such simple explanations, and
there appear to be some more complex factors affecting sludge bulk and
also influencing the rake torque developed at a given consistency.

Except for the mechanical limitations noted in the previous section,
carbonation has proceeded in accordance with expectations.  Sampling
difficulties have limited the precision of estimates of gas absorption
efficiency.  However, it appears that the efficiency has been above 85%
for pH values above 10.0.  Efficiency will increase with pH.  Automatic
control of pH has required some careful instrument adjustment to compen-
sate for the equilibration time of the system.  However, control to
within +.0.2 pH units has been accomplished whenever proper instrument
performance and steady kiln operation (uniform gas composition) were
achieved.

Carbonation clarifier effluent clarity has been variable.  Calcium
losses in the clarifier overflow have ranged from 20 mg/1 to over
200 mg/1 as CaO; in the later months of operation, the average loss has
been slightly above 100 mg/1 as CaO, about twice the content of the raw
waste.  The most important adverse factors contributing to higher losses
have been high quantities of NSSC components, and low lime dose.  It
appears that all-kraft effluent with adequate lime treatment would halve
this loss.  It is also believed that uniform pH control would assist
settling of the calcium carbonate, although no pH has been established
as best for,this purpose.

Since underflow sludge from the carbonation clarifier is delivered to
the color clarifier input, consistency is not critical, and a high
pumping rate is normally maintained.  Thus, there is usually no sub-
stantial sludge accumulation in the clarifier except in case of pump
failure.  As noted elsewhere, the limiting settled consistency has been
about 25% solids, with surprisingly good fluidity.  (See discussion in
Section V.)
            I
Centrifuge discharge cake has averaged about 33% solids over the full
demonstration period.  Since installation of the new design conveyor

                                   77

-------
screw, the average consistency has been 35%, with a range of 30% to
40%.  Centrate discharge has ranged from 1% to 7% solids, with an average
consistency of 3.5%.  At the average values of 14%, 35% and 3.5% for feed
sludge, cake and centrate, respectively, the solids recovery of the cen-
trifuge is 83.3%.  It had been believed that, if average percent recovery
fell so low, a retention aid would be required to avoid occasionally ex-
cessive accumulation of small-particle material.  However, no additives
have been used at any time.

Effects on Lime Burning.

The greatest uncertanties which had been felt about the effect of color
sludge on lime burning were on two points:   the possibility of forming
rings or balls in the kiln, and the physical characteristics of the lime.
In both cases, no effects have been noted.   The kiln has formed ballst
but the most serious were when no color sludge had been introduced.  The
product lime does not look different; there is no evident difference in
fragility of pellets; reactivity in the slaker does not change when
color sludge is added or omitted.

Although it seems certain that lime impurities are contributed by the
color sludge, the amounts have been less than those involved in changes
in the kraft mill system (specifically, changes in green liquor dregs
handling).  At most, the impurity level has risen to slightly over 10%
(defined as the sum of acid insolubles and  RO^)-  There does seem to be
some adverse affect on filtration of causticizfng mud,  but problems
with green liquor quality have complicated  evaluation.

The impact of color sludge on kiln capacity and fuel use has (at worst)
not exceeded the calculated difference based on water content of the
sludge.  Precision of data on lime output has not been  good enough to
indicate whether the organic matter in the  sludge makes a useful fuel
contribution.  However, observations at the time of fuel (natural gas)
trip-outs have shown flame in kiln regions  which should represent effec-
tive heat input.
Note:

A U. S. Patent (No. 3,639,206)  has been issued, covering the process
involved in this project.  (22)
                                   78

-------
                                SECTION VII

                          ECONOMIC CONSIDERATIONS

Capital Cost.

Capital costs related to the color removal process may be divided
into three categories:  (a) process facilities used exclusively for
carrying out the process, (b) cost of a proportion of lime-burning
and related system for incineration and lime recovery, and (c)  other
costs, including land, sewer additions and alterations, holding reser-
voirs, access roads, etc.  We shall deal here with only the first two.

The color removal process facilities are considered to include  all
effluent handling from inlet piping to the grit basin to the discharge
piping of the outlet basin, including overflow and by-pass structures;
and further to include lime supply and recovery, beginning at the lime
feed conveyor to the color removal slaker and ending at the certrifuge
discharge conveyor.  An approximate subdivision of cost is as follows:

          Lime Input                                 $   35,602
          Inlet Control; Grit & Trash System            121,319
          Lift Station                                   55,170
          Color Clarifier                               274,335
          Carbonation                                    95,994
          Carbonation Clarifier                         277,082
          Outlet Basin                                   40,880
          Sludge Storage & Dewatering                   135,627
          Instruments & Controls                        115,015
          Process Piping                                256,278
          Motor Controls                                 24,805
          Electrical Wiring & Lighting                   80,146
          Pipe Bridge                                    51,547
          Painting & Misc.                               38,122
          Spare Parts                                    59.393
               Total Direct                           1,661,315
          Engineering, Plans & Specifications            87,825
          Construction Supervision                       12,421
               Total Cost - Color Removal            $1,761,561
                 (Excluding Lime Kiln Cost)

It is economically significant that the process performs the function
of the conventional primary clarifier and provides complete and final
sludge disposal by incineration.  The color clarifier is actually
smaller than the primary clarifier which would be needed for the same
effluent.  Thus, a new mill would require no other expenditures for these
purposes, and an existing mill might adapt an existing  clarifier to serve
in the color removal process.

The lime kiln requirement to meet peak needs for effluent  treatment amounts
to at least 25% of total kraft mill lime supply.  The cost of  the 12' by

                                   79

-------
290' kiln totalled $2,667,000, Including conveying and storage equipment.
The effluent treatment share of cost would amount to $533,391.  If addi-
tional calcining capacity necessitates an additional kiln,  costs will  be
much greater.

Operating Costs.

During the demonstration period, the volume of waste treated was slightly
below the acticipated flow rate, because of water use economies and
because it was not possible to transfer some desired flows  to the sys-
tem.  Cost factors have been developed for a flow rate of 9 million
gallons per day and calculated for an average production of 750 tons
of paper per day.  The chief cost components are:  lime loss, fuel  use,
electric power consumption and maintenance.

Lime loss has been calculated from the difference in calcium concen-
tration between input and output water, and from sludge lost to sewer.
During the last 7 months of the demonstration period, average lime loss
was 85 tons per month.  The data indicate that effluent losses have
been high because of NSSC effects which have been previously discussed.
There have been some sludge losses to sewer; with operational improve-
ments, these losses should become rare.  Costs have been calculated on
the basis of purchased quicklime make-up at $22 per ton. Lime loss of
85 tons per month is equivalent to 7.5 pounds per ton of paper, or 630
pounds per million gallons.  The costs are $0.0825 per ton, or $6.93  per
million gallons.

Average operating electrical horsepower has been about 1,000, for which
the cost of electricity is estimated at $100 per day.  This amounts to
$0.13 per ton of paper.

Fuel requirements attributable to color sludge processing have been
equivalent to 17,500 million Btu per month.  This calculates to 0.77
million Btu per ton, or 65 million Btu per million gallons  of effluent.
If a value of $0.48 per million Btu is assigned, the above  requirements
amount to $0.37 per ton of paper, or $31.12 per million gallons.

Maintenance costs are estimated at $50,000 per year; this is equiva-
lent to $0.19 per ton, or $15.63 per million gallons.

Summarizing, operating cost (not including depreciation, taxes or
insurance) under these particular conditions would be:

                               Per Ton     Per Million Gallons
     Lime Make-Up               $0.08            $ 6.93
     Fuel                        0.37             31.12
     Electric Power              0.13             11,11
     Maintenance                 0.19             15.63
         Total                  WT77            $64.79

Obviously, these costs will be much affected by mill tonnage and water

                                   80

-------
use.  To illustrate, we have assumed a mill expansion to 1,500 tons per
day with water economies to yield a total water use of 15 million gal-
lons daily, of which 13 million gallons requires lime treatment.  Pro-
cess balance and pulp washing are assumed adequate to avoid the NSSC
effects on calcium carbonate recovery which applied to the previous
case.  Lime make-up needs are taken as 5,400 pounds per day.  Treatment
dosage and fiber loss are assumed to be in the same ratio to effluent
volume as in the first case, resulting in a fuel demand of 25,280 mil-
lion Btu per month (0.56 million Btu/ton).  Electrical load is increased
by use of an additional kiln gas blower and a second centrifuge which
must operate at least half time, so that operating load is 1j350 HP.  Total
maintenance cost is essentially unchanged.

The resulting cost, based on the same unit prices as in the previous
case are:

                                 Per Ton     Per Million Gallons

     Lime Make-Up                 $0.04            $ 4.57
   v Fuel                          0.27             31.12
     Electric Power                0.09             10.38
     Maintenance                   0.10             11.75
          Total                   3OO            $57.82

It should be noted that the fuel pricing has a substantial effect on
the total cost.
                                    81

-------
                                SECTION VIII

                              ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

During a period of more than four years, many Continental  people
contributed to the successful completion of the project.   Among
them:

   - Mr. S. Bruce Smart, Paper Group Executive Vice-President,
     headed the Continental management team,  including Mr. E. A.
     Henry {Division General Manager) and Mr. J.  G.  Lee (Division
     Mgr. of Mfg.), which provided the leadership for a large com-
     mitment of corporate funds in a pioneering effort.

   - Mr. C. C. Kunz, Plant Manager at Hodge,  by insistent  assertion
     of project priority, assured the needed  team effort despite
     competing demands for time.

   - Mr. W. Leroy Coker, Assistant Plant Manager of  the Hodge mill,
     served as project manager during the major portion of the  period.

   - Mr. Edgar L. Spruill conceived the project, participated in the
     plant design and construction, and provided technical super-
     vision of the operation and evaluation program.

   - Mr. Fred Turner, research technician, performed much  of the basic
     laboratory and pilot plant work which defined the project.

   - Dr. John Schulz supervised process studies for  the final plant
     design.

   - Mr. Bobby Sammons supervised the departmental operating crews.

   - Mr. Ross F. Miller co-ordinated the major efforts of  plant
     design and construction.

The advice and support of Mr. Herbert Berger, of the National Council
for Air and Stream Improvement, is appreciatively acknowledged.

The efforts of Mr. Dick Moll, Pennwalt Corporation,  in helping
establish satisfactory centrifuge dewatering  are noted with thanks.

The encouragement and help of Mr. Robert A. Lafleur, Executive  Secretary
of the Louisiana Stream Control Commission, is gratefully  acknowledged.

The support of the project by the Environmental Protection Agency,
and the assistance provided by Mr. George Webster, Dr. James D.
Gallup, Mr. Robert Hi Her and the Grant Project Officers,  Mr. George
Putnicki and Dr. Richard Hill, are acknowledged with sincere thanks.
                                   82

-------
                           SECTION IX

                           REFERENCES
 1.   Moggio, W. A., "Experimental Chemical  Treatments for Kraft Mill
     Wastes," Tech. Bull. No. 50, National  Council  for Stream Improve-
     ment, New York, N. Y. (1952).

 2.   Moggio, W. A., "Kraft Mill Wastes Research," Tech.  Bull.  No.  57,
     National Council for Stream Improvement, New York,  N.  Y.  (1953).

 3.   Moggio, W. A. and Freeman, L., "Treatment of Calcium-Organic  Sludges
     Obtained from Lime Treatment of Kraft  Mill  Effluents,  Part I," Tech.
     Bull.. No. 62, National Council for Stream Improvement, New York,
     N. Y. (1953).

 4.   Moggio, W. A., "Color Removal from Kraft Mill  Effluent,"  TAPPI
     XXXVII, (1955) 564-567.

 5.   Moggio, W. A., "Development Studies on the Removal  of Color from
     Caustic Extract Bleaching Effluent by  the Surface Reaction Process,
     Part I," Tech. Bull. No. 107, National Council  for Stream Improve-
     ment, New York, N. Y. (1958).

 6.   Berger, H. F. and Brown, R. I., "The Surface Reaction Method  for
     Color Removal from Kraft Bleachery Effluents,"  TAPPI XLII. (1959)
     245-248.
                                                             i'

 7.   Berger, H. F., "Removal of Color Bodies from Bleachery Effluents
     Through Modification of Kraft Recovery Process," Tech. Bull.  No. 131,
     National Council for Stream Improvement, New York,  N.  Y.  (1960).

 8.   Berger, H. F., Gehm, H. W., and Herbet, A.  J.,  "Decolorizing  Kraft
     Waste Liquors," U. S. Patent 3,120,464 (February 4, 1964).

 9.   Herbet, A. J., "A Process for Removal  of Color from Bleached  Kraft
     Effluents Through Modification of the  Chemical  Recovery System,"
     Tech. Bull. No. 157, National Council  for Stream Improvement, New
     York, N. Y. (1962).

10.   "Evaluation and Demonstration of Massive Lime Process for Color
     Removal;" Project No. 12040 D4D, Office of Research and Monitoring,
     Environmental Protection Agency, January, 1972.

11.   Fuller, R. R., "Color Removal from Kraft Effluents," Southern Pulp
     and Paper Manufacturer, September 10,  1971.   (Also U.  S.  Patent
     3,627,679.)
                                   83

-------
12.  Fuchs, R.  E.,  "Decolorization of Pulp  Mill  Bleaching  Effluents  Using
     Activated Carbon," Tech.  Bull. No.  181,  National  Council  for  Stream
     Improvement, New York, N.  Y.  (1965).

13.  McGlasson, W.  G., Thibodeaux, L.  J., and Berger,  H. F.,  "Potential
     Uses of Activated Carbon  for  Wastewater  Renovation,"  TAPPI  XLIX,
     (1966) 521-526.

14.  Berger, H. F., "Evaluating Water Reclamation  Against  Rising Costs
     of Water and Effluent Treatment," TAPPI  XLIX, (1966,  No.  8) 79A-82A.

15.  Thibodeaux, L. J., Smith,  D.  R.,  and Berger,  H.  F., "Wastewater
     Renovation Possibilities  in the Pulp and Paper Industry," Chemical
     Engineering Progress Symposium Series, No.  90, Chemical  Engineering
     Progress, 64:178.

16.  Smith  D.  R.,  M.S. thesis, Louisiana State  University,  Baton  Rouge
     (1968).

17.  Rich, L. G., "Unit Operations of Sanitary Engineering,"  John  Wiley  &
     Sons, New York.

18.  Spruill, E. L.,  "Color Removal from Paper Mill  Waste,"  Proceedings
     of the 25th Purdue Industrial Waste Conference,  p. 761.   "Paper Mill
     Waste; Treatment for Color Removal," Water  and Sewage (Industrial
     Wastes supplement), 118:(No.  4)IW/15 TJJIrTh7A"pH 1, 1971T

19.  Bennett, D. J.,  Dence, C.  W., Kung, F. -L., Luner,, P.,  and  Ota, M.,
     "The Mechanism of Color Removal in the Treatment  of Spent Bleaching
     Liquors with Lime," TAPPI  54(12):2019  (1971).

20.  McDonald, R. G.  (Ed.), "Pulp  and Paper Manufacture,"  Second Edition,
     Vol. I, p. 533.

21.  Spruill, E. L.,  "Color Removal and Sludge Recovery from Total Mill
     Effluent," TAPPI 56(4).

22.  Spruill, E. 1.,  U. S. Patent 3,639,206 (Feb.  1,  1972),  assigned to
     Continental Can  Company,  Inc.
                                   84

-------
                              SECTION X

                              GLOSSARY


ACFM - Actual cubic feet per minute; volume (including water vapor)
at the existing pressure and temperature.

Black Liquor - Spent liquor from wood pulping by the kraft process,
including dissolved organic matter and other products of cooking liquor
reactions.   (The organic content comprises about half the original dry
weight of wood.)

BOD - Biochemical oxygen demand; BODc refers to measurement of demand
iuring a five-day period under specified conditions.  (See Appendix  C.)

Brown Liquor - Spent liquor from wood pulping by the NSSC process.

Carbonatlon - Treatment with carbon dioxide.  In this paper, refers
especially to neutralization of alkalinity and/or precipitation of
calcium carbonate with carbon dioxide.

Caustic Extraction - A processing stage, in pulp bleaching practice,
wherein lignin previously treated with chlorine or other oxidants is
solubilized with alkali (usually sodium hydroxide) and separated from
the pulp.

Causticizing - (Sometimes "recausticizing") - Conversion of sodium
carbonate to sodium hydroxide by reaction with lime (N32C03 + CaO +
H20 = 2 NaOH + CaC03); especially applied with reference to sodium car-
bonate recovered by incineration of kraft black liquor.

Clarifier- A device, usually continuous in operation, in which
suspended matter is separated from a liquid by sedimentation, per-
mitting withdrawal of a clear liquid a relatively concentrated
slurry of the solid matter.

COD - Chemical oxygen demand, generally considered to represent the
oxygen required to convert most organic substances to carbon dioxide,
water and other fully oxidized compounds; commonly measured by di-
chromate consumption.  (See Appendix C.)

Kraft - A widely-used wood pulping process employing sodium hydroxide
with sodium sulfide to dissolve lignin.  Also called "sulfate process,"
because sodium sulfate is used as a make-up chemical; carbon char in
black liquor incineration reduces the sulfate to sulfide.

Mud (or "Lime Mud") - A common kraft pulping usage to designate the
concentrated calcium carbonate slurry separated in the causticizing
process.  Used in this report to help distinguish from sludges or slurries
generated by the waste water treatments described.

                                   85

-------
mg/1 - Mllligrams per liter; for dilute acqueous solutions, this value
is approximately identical to parts per million by weight.

NSSC - Neutral sulfite semi-chemical, a pulping process employing sod-
ium sulfite with (usually) sodium carbonate; hardwoods are commonly
pulped at 70 - 80% yields for production of corrugating medium.

Recovery System (kraft pulping) - A process wherein kraft black  liquor
is concentrated by evaporation, burned in a furnace to recover heat
value of organic substances (for steam generation) and chemical  value
of inorganic materials (which are ashed, dissolved and causticized to
make fresh "cooking" liquor).

TOC - Total organic carbon, a measure of the carbon contained in the
organic compounds in a waste water, for a given waste water source,
this measurement may provide a useful index to chemical oxygen demand,
or otherwise constitute a measure of pollution potential.  This  para-
meter is susceptible to a standard instrumental procedure.  (See Appen-
dix C.)
                                  86

-------
                             SECTION XI
                             APPENDICES

                                                              Page No.
A.  Equipment List for Demonstration Plant 	   88-91
B.  Instrument Loops - Color Removal Plant
    - List of Instrument Loops   	   92-94
    - Instrument Loop Diagrams   	   95-118
C.  Sampling, Analytical and Testing Methods
    - Tests on Liquid Effluents  	       119
    - Tests on Lime and Sludges  	 119-120
D.  Monthly Data Tabulations, Typical Month	121-124
                                   87

-------
                                               APPENDIX A

                                              EQUIPMENT LIST
00
00
      Equipment No.

      0420
      0421
      0422
      0430
      0431
      0440

      0441
      0010
      0020

      0030

      0040

      0021
      0031
      0041
      0050
        •%

      0060
      0061
      0062
Name of Equipment

Grit Collector, with Chain Drive
Motor
Speed Reducer
Disc Screen, Chain Drive &
  Reducer

Motor
Conveyor, Screen Discharge
  w/dri ve
Motor
Raw Waste Lift Station
Raw Waste Lift Pump #1

Raw Waste Lift Pump #2

Raw Waste Lift Pump #3

Motor, Lift Pump #1
Motor, Lift Pump #2
Motor, Lift Pump #3
Color Clarifier/Thickener

Clarifier Mechanism
Motor, Rake Drive, 41
Motor, Rake Drive, #2
Mfr. & Model

Jeffrey Mfg. Co.
(Included)
(Incl.) Falk 6K24
Jeffrey Mfg. Co.
  (Steel exc. 31655
  screen pi.)
(Included)
Jeffrey Mfg. Co.

(Included)
Field Erected
  Sheet pile &
  concrete
Goulds Pump, Inc.
  VIM-14
Goulds Pump, Inc.
  VIM-14
Goulds Pump, Inc.
  VIM-14
General Electric
General Electric
General Electric
Shell field erected
  concrete
Eimco Corp.
  CXXT Extra
  Heavy Duty
General Electric
General Electric
Capacity, HP, etc.


3 HP @ 1800 RPM

14' 0 w/0.5" holes


1 HP @ 1800 RPM
1 HP @ 1800 RPM
18 0, 17' deep


6500 GPM 
-------
CO
to
     Equipment  No.

     0070


     0080
     0071
     0081
     0100

     0110

     0111
     0120
0130


0121
0131
0140

0141

0142
0150

0160

0170

0180
0181
                  Name of Equipment

                  Color Clarifier Sludge
                    Pump #1

                  Color Clarifier Sludge
                    Pump #2

                  Motor, Sludge Pump #1
                  Motor, Sludge Pump #2
                  Color Sludge Storage Tank

                  Tank Mechanism

                  Motor
                  Color Mud Pump #1
Color Mud Pump #2


Motor
Motor
Centrifuge

Motor

Eddy-Current Brake
Filtrate Hopper

Sludge Hopper

Centrate Head Tank

Lime Feeder with v.s. Reducer
Motor
Mfr. & Model

Morris Men. Works
  3JC14 (V-belt
         drive)
Morris Mch. Works
  3JC14 (V-belt
         drive)
General Electric
General Electric
Rothschild Boiler
  & Tank Works
Eimco Corp.
  Type BRM
General Electric
Galigher 2VRG200
  2 x 2-1/2, belt-
  dri ven
Galigher 2VRG200
  2 x 2-1/2, belt-
  driven
General Electric
General Electric
Pennwalt; Sharpies
  P-5400
General Electric
  (Spec. Winding)

Rothschild Boiler
  & Tank Works
Rothschild Boiler
  & Tank Works
Rothschild Boiler
  & Tank Works
Screw Conveyor Corp.
(Incl. with reducer)
                                                            Capacity. HP, etc.

                                                            300 GPM (3 170'
                                                              (500 GPM @ 40')

                                                            300 GPM @ 170'
                                                              (500 GPM @ 40')

                                                            40 HP @ 1800 RPM
                                                            40 HP £ 1800 RPM
                                                            30 0 x 20'  Steel
                                                            15 HP 9 1800 RPM
                                                            185 GPM (P 80'
185 GPM e 80'
                                                                                  15 HP @ 1800 RPM
                                                                                  15 HP @ 1800 RPM
                                                                                       "x"
                                                                                  285  GPM
                                                                                  200  HP @ 1800 RPM

                                                                                  40 HP
                                                                                  14" 0 x 16'
                                                                                  5 HP (P 1800 RPM

-------
ID
o
Equipment Ncr.

0200

0201
0210

0211
0212
0220

0230

0240

0250

0251
0260

0270

0261
0271
0280

0290

0300

0310

0400

0291
Name of Equipment

Lime Slaker Conveyor with
  Reducer
Motor
Lime Slaker, with Rake
  Classifier
Agitator, Motor
Classifier Motor
Vent Stack

Grits Chute

Lime Slurry Tank

Agitator, Slurry Tank

Motor
Lime Slurry Pump #1

Lime Slurry Pump #2

Motor
Motor
Carbonation Tank

Agitator #1, Carbonation Tank

Agitator #2, Carbonation Tank

Agitator #3, Carbonation Tank

Agitator #4, Carbonation Tank

Motor, Agitator #1
                                                              Mfr.  & Model
                      Capacity, HP, etc.
                                                              Screw Conveyor Corp.  15" 0 x 16'
                                                                Falk  323  EX II
                                                              (Included above)      3 HP @ 1800 RPM
                                                              Dorr-Oliver No. 7
General Electric
General Electric
Rothschild Boiler
  & Tank Works
Rothschild Boiler
  & Tank Works
Rothschild Boiler
  & Tank Works
Cleveland Mixer Co
  Heavy Duty Model AL
General Electric
Galigher Vac-Seal
  2 x 2-1/2
Galigher Vac-Seal
  2 x 2-1/2
General Electric
General Electric
Rothschild Boiler
  & Tank Works
Chemineer, Inc.
  MDP-400-721
Chemineer, Inc.
  MDP-400-721
Chemineer, Inc.
  MDP-400-721
Chemineer, Inc.
  MDP-400-721
General Electric
  324 T
                                                                                   15 HP @  1800  RPM
                                                                                   2 HP 
-------
Equipment No.

0301

0311

0401

0320

0321
0322
0330

0340

0341
0342
0350


0360
0351
0361
0370
0380
0381
0382
4000
6000
6010
Name of Equipment

Motor, Agitator #2

Motor, Agitator #3

Motor, Agitator #4

Compressor, Kiln Gas with
  Lube Oil System
Motor, Compressor
Motor, Oil Pump
Carbonation Clarifier

Clarifier Mechanism

Motor, Rake Drive, #1
Motor, Rake Drive, #2
Carbonation Sludge Pump #1


Carbonation Sludge Pump #2
Motor, Sludge Pump #1
Motor, Sludge Pump #2
Outlet Basin
A/C Unit, Motor Control Room
Motor, Compressor
Motor, Fan
Motor Controls
Instruments & Process Controls
Instrument Panel, Control  Room
Mfr. & Model

General Electric
  324 T
General Electric
  324 T
General Electric
  324 T
Roots-Connersvi11 e
  1421, RGVS
General Electric
(with Compressor)
Tank, field-erected
  concrete
Eimco Corp., CXXT
  Extra heavy duty
General Electric
General Electric
Morris Mch. Works
  1-1/2 OCL4 (Belt
             drive)
Morris Mch. Works
  1-1/2 JCL4 (Belt
             drive)
General Electric
General Electric
Concrete, field-
  erected with gas
  diffuser piping
Carrier Corp.
(Included)
(Included)
General Electric
Foxboro Company
Foxboro Company
Capacity, HP, etc.

40 HP @ 1800 RPM

40 HP @ 1800 RPM

40 HP @ 1800 RPM

4000 ACFM

250 HP @ 900 RPM
1 HP (3 1800 RPM
135' 0 15' side-
  wall depth
1,200,000 ft.-lbs.
  working torque
10 HP @ 1800 RPM
10 HP (3 1800 RPM
100 GPM @ 120'


100 GPM (3 120'
10 HP (3 1800 RPM
10 HP (3 1800 RPM
21'  x 27' x 12' D.
10 HP
1-1/2 HP

-------
                           APPENDIX B

                        INSTRUMENT LOOPS
Loop 001      Level, Raw Waste Pump Station
LIC-001       Controller, 0 - 15 ft.;  Proportional  & Reset
LR-001       Recorder; 4 in. strip; 0-15 Scale
LT-001       Transmitter; 0 - 180 in.  I-^O; output  10-5 MADC
LV-001A      Control  Valve; 24" Butterfly; 316 SS  Trim; Cyl.  Op.  w/
               positioner
LV-001B      Control  Valve, alternate flow -  Sec.  Clarifier;  same as
               LV-001A
LAH-001       Annunciator - High Level

Loop 002     Flow,  Raw Waste to Color Clarifier
FE-002       Orifice Plate, radius taps;  50"  we at 15,000 GPM

Loop 003     Speed  Control, Lime Feeder
HS-003       Switch
SC-003       Speed  Control

Loop 004     Speed, Lime Feeder
SI-004       Indicator, 0-30 RPM
ST-004       Transmitter

Loop 006     Dilution to Slaker
FI-006       Indicator, 0 - 200 GPM
FV-006       Control  Valve, 2.5" CI Globe; w/positioner
FE-006       Orifice Plate, flange taps;  100" we at 200 GPM
FT-006       Transmitter
FC-006       Controller
FAL-006      Annunciator - Low Flow

Loop 007     Temperature, Slaker Dilution
TE-007       Resistance Bulb, 0 - 300°F.
TR-007       Recorder, 4" strip; 0 -  300; 2 pen (with  TR-008)

Loop 008     Temperature, Slaker
TE-008       Resistance Bulb, 0 - 30QOF.
TR-008       Recorder, 4" strip; 0 -  300; 2 pen (with  TR-007)

Loop 009     Lime Slurry Tank Level
LT-009       Transmitter, 0 - 120" water
LIC-009      Level  Controller
LV-009       Control  Valve, 2" CI Globe;  diaphragm operator
FV-009       Flush  Valve, Slurry Line; 2" DI  Ball; Elec. 2-pos.  operator

Loop 010     Color  Clarifier Rake Torque
XT-010       Torque Transmitter

                                   92

-------
XR-010     Torque Recorder, 4" strip; scale 0-2 (with XR-011)
XS-010     Clarifier Rake Switch
XAH-010    Annunciator, High Torque

Loop Oil   Carbonation Clarifier Rake Torque
XT-Oil     Torque Transmitter
XR-011     Torque Recorder, 4" strip; scale 0-2 (with XR-010)
XS-011     Clarifier Rake Switch
XAH-011    Annunciator, High Torque

Loop 012   Carbonation pH
AE-012     pH Element, Glass/calomel
AIT-012    Transmitter, pH, 0 - 14
AIC-012    Controller, with proportional and reset functions
AV-012     Control valve, 8", 316 SS Butterfly; diaphragm oper., w/
             positioner
AR-012     Recorder, pH, 0 - 14; 4" strip (2 pen, with ZR-012)
ZR-012     Recorder, valve position; with AR-012

Loop 013   Outlet Basin pH
AE-013     pH Element, 014
AIT-013    Transmitter, pH, 0 - 14
AIC-013    Controller, with proportional and reset functions
AV-013     Control Valve, 3", 316 SS Butterfly; diaphragm oper., w/
             positioner
AR-013     Recorder, pH, 0 - ,14; 4" strip (2 pen, with ZR-013)
ZR-013     Recorder, Valve Position, with AR-013

Loop 014   Color Clarifier Sludge Flow
FE-014     Magnetic Flow Meter, 4", 304 SS Tube, Teflon Liner
FIC-014    Flow Controller, 0 - 300 6PM; Proportional  & Reset Functions
FR-014     Recorder, 0 - 300, 4" strip; 3 pen, with FR-015 &  018
FT-014     Transmitter, 0 - 300 GPM; 10-50 MADC
FV-014     Control Valve, ball, 3" body, 2" SS Trim; Diaph. Op. w/
             positioner
FV-014A    Control Valve, ball, 6", 316 SS Trim; cyl.  operator
FAL-014    Annunciator, low flow

Loop 015   Carbonation Clarifier Sludge Flow
FE-015     Magnetic Flow Meter, 2", 304 SS Tube, Teflon Liner
FIC-015    Flow Controller, 0 - 150 GPM; proportional  & reset
FR-015     Recorder, 0 - 150; 4" strip; 3 pen, with FR-014 &  -018
FT-015     Transmitter, 0 - 150 GPM; 10-50 MADC
FV-015     Control Valve, 3" ball, 316 SS Trim; diaph. op.; w/
             positioner
FV-015A    Control Valve, 4" ball, 316 SS Trim; cyl. operator
HIC-015A   Controller, hand loader, 0 - 100%

Loop 017   Color Sludge Storage Tank Level
I-T-Q3Z     Transmitter, 0 - 240" water; 10-50 MADC
LR-017     Recorder, 0-20 ft.; 4n strip

                                   93

-------
LAH-017    Annunciator,  high  level
LAL-017    Annunciator,  low level

Loop 018   Flow, Color Sludge to Centrifuge
FE-018     Magnetic Flow Meter,  4";  304 SS tube,  Teflon  liner
FIC-018    Flow Controller, 0 -  200  6PM; proportional  &  reset
FR-018     Recorder, 0 - 200; 4" strip; 3 pen, with  FR-014  & -015
FT-018     Transmitter,  0 - 200  GPM; 10-50 MADC
FV-018     Control  Valve, 4"  ball, 2"  SS trim; diaph.  op.,  w/
             positioner

Loop 019   Annunciator
ANN-019    Annunciator,  4 wide x 3 high; horn &  flasher

Loop 020   C02 Compressor Relief
PIC-020    Controller, 0-15; proportional  & reset
PT-020     Transmitter,  0-15 psig; 10-50 MADC
PCV-020    Control  Valve, 6"  Butterfly, 316  SS;  diaphragm oper., w/
             positioner

Loop 021   Torque - Centrifuge
XR-021     Recorder, 0 - 100%, 4" strip
XT-021     Transmitter 0 - 50 mv to  10-50 MADC
XAH-021    Annunciator,  high  torque

Loop 023   Slaker Agitator Motor
QA-023     Annunciator,  agitator stopped

Loop 026   Flush, Color Sludge Pump  and Lines
FV-026     Control  Valve,'!"  ball, 316 SS Trim;  diaphragm oper., w/
             solenoid, 3 ways
FV-026A    Control  Valve, 10" ball,  316 SS trim;  cyl.  oper., w/hand
             jack
HS-026     Switch

Loop 027   Flush, Centrifuge
FV-027     Control  Valve, 3"  globe,  316 SS trim;  diaph.  oper., w/
             solenoid
HS-027     Switch

Loop 028   Carbonation Sludge Recirculation
FV-028     Control  Valve, 3"  ball, 316 SS Trim;  cyl. oper.; w/
             positioner
HIC-028    Controller, hand loader,  0  - 100%
                                  94

-------
ES.
E.5. nia  VAC)
                                                                          BY-PASS TO
                                                                             . CLARIF.
                                                                            *•
                                                                         TO COLOR
                                                                         CLARIF.
                    LEVEL, RAW WASTE PUMP STATION
                          Loop 001

-------
                               PE-002
RAW WASTE  PUMP
STATION EFFLUENT
                    NOTE: QFUFiCE FOR FUTURE RECORDING
              RAW WASTE FLOW TO COLOR CLARIFIER
Loop 002

-------
   LIME FEEDER
   G7.3-OT8O
      — — \\
LIME FEEDER SPEED CONTROL
Loop 003

-------
00
                                                         LIME

                                                       DAY   BIN
                                                       27.8-OOEO
                                     PESJER
                                    GT.3 -O18O
LIME
FEEDER
SPEED
Loop
004


-------
VO
<£>
    VZ 304 S3. TUBING
       167.3-006-PI
'/£" 304 55. TUBING
 |£7.3-00€>-P2
IG73-OQ6-A1
                            A.S. C    P5I6)
                                                   	C  ES.C118 YAC.)
DILUTION  WATER
TO  SLAKER
67-3 - O210
SLAKER
DILUTION WATER
FLOW
Loop
006


-------
                E.5.018 VAC.)  *	
o
o
                                            R/I

                                             	^ E.S. 018 YA.C)
DILUTION WATER TO

SLAKER ,
                       TEMPERATURE, WATER TO SLAKER
                   Loop 007

-------
                       R/I
                      	5  E.S. 018 VAC.)
                              SLURRY   FROM   LIME
                              SLAKER  673-OZ1O
TEMPERATURE, SLURRY FROM SLAKER
Loop 008

-------
                             r
                             I   67.3-00
                                                    <>  FLUSH  WATER
                                            TO PR|.  CLARlF.
                         LEVEL, LIME SLURRY TANK
                         Loop 009

-------
                              E.S. (MS VAC.)  V-
o
CO
                                    FWE
                                                            \
                                                                  :* TORQUE
                                                           4  E S.  (63- 95  Y.D.C, )
                           FWE
NOTE:  SEE EIMCO  DWGS.  7276 IC4
                                                                           7Z76IC5
                           COLOR CLARIFIER RAKE TORQUE
                                                  Loop 010

-------
           OCR
            \ O1Q
  PWE
                              X=TORQUE
                    	4  E.S. (63-95 V.D-C.)
FWE
NOTE:  SEf  EIMCO  DVVGS.   72.7&tC^
CARBONATION
CLARIFIER
RAKE
TORQUE
Loop
01
1


-------
      E.S. (118 VAC.)  
-------
       E.S. 018 V.A.C) V--
o
en
                                                                    pH
                                  67.3-013-Afl


                                  A-S. (40  PS»G)
	1>  E.S-018 VAO
                                                                                    VAC.)
                                 OUTLET pH
      Loop 013

-------
            t	^, __^_ ^_ -
E.S. 018V.A.C)    ES. ms VA.C.)
 NOTE:  /A/STALL  BY' PASS         |
    FV-OI4A     A80VE  FV-01-^
VA.C.) 
-------
                                                     e.s. me  VA.C.)
O
00

                                          ij
                                         ill
                                                                                      18 V.AC.)
J61.3 -Q)5"-AE|
                                                                 SLUDGE FROM CARB.  CLAR1F.
                                                                 TO  MUD  STORAGE  TANK
                         CARBONATION SLUDGE  FLOW TO STORAGE
          Loop 015

-------
                                                           .S.  ma
                                                 	-4  E. S. (63-95 VD.C.
o

-------
	1
E.S.
                            4 E.S.  (118 tfAC.)
                           I67-3-Q18-A1
                                           T
                                           *
                                                   COLOR SLUDGE STOR.
                                                   TK, TO CENTRIFUGE
FLOW, SLUDGE TO CENTRIFUGE
                                                         Loop 018

-------
HIGH LEVEL
RAW WASTE
LIFT STATION
HIGH TORQUE
CENTRIFUGE
*1
LOW FLOW
DJLUTION
TO SLAKER
HIGH TORQUE
CO4.&R
CLARIF. RAKE
Hl&H TORQUE
CENTRIFUGE
*Z
MOTOR STOPPED
SLAKER
AGITATOR
HIGH TORQUE
CARS- CLARIF.
RAKE
HJGH TORQUE
COLOR SLUDGE
TANK AGITATOR
LOW FLOW
PR I. CLAR\F.
SLUDGE
HIGH LEVEL
COLOR SLU06ET
STORAGE TAWK
LOW LEVEL
COLOR SLUDGE
STORAGE TANK
SPARE
ANNUNCIATOR ENGRAVING
Loop 019

-------
VENT TO  STACK
       167.3-020-A1
   A.S. H-O PSD
                          r
                                                             ^  E.S. I H8 VAC)
        COZ  COMPRESSOR
        67.3 -03ZO
COMPRESSED GAS  TO
CARBONATION  BASIN
4 AFTER   CLAR1F
            C02 COMPRESSOR RELIEF CONTROL
                     Loop 020

-------
<*>
COLOR SLUDGE
FROM
STORAGE PUMPS
                                         PUT.
                               X-TORQUE
                                           FWE
\ \  \  \  \  \ \
  \  \  \ \  \ \  \
                                       COLOR  SLUDGE
                                       CENTRIFUGE
                                       EQ. No. OHO
                       CENTRIFUGE HIGH TORQUE ALARM
                                                            Loop 021

-------
                     AGITATOR
                            LIME SLAKER
                            EQ.  NO.  OE10
SLAKER AGITATOR STOPPED ALARM
Loop 023

-------
          DILUTION  WATER TO  SLAKER
          SERVICE N* 734
PRESSURE, SLAKER DILUTION WATER
Loop 025

-------
             67.3-026-A1
                 A.S.<
        FLUSH WATER
TO  CENTRIFUGE
                                                    SPECIFIED  ON PANEL DWG
                        COLOR  SLUDGE

                            PUMPS
COLOR SLUDGE
STORAGE  TK.
67-3 -O!00
                     COLOR SLUDGE PUMP & LINES FLUSH
                Loop 026

-------
[6T3-027-A1
AS. (
       *)
         EV-027
                              FLUSH  WATER
                              - 027

OLOR SLUDGE TO CENTRIFUGE
           CENTRIFUGE FLUSH
                                                         Loop 027

-------
00
                                              FROM  CARBONATE  SLUDGE
                                              PUMPS  TO  CARBONATION BASIN

                                           -* A.S.
                        CARBONATION SLUDGE RECIRCULATION
Loop 028

-------
                                 APPENDIX C

                           SAMPLING, ANALYTICAL AND
                             TESTING METHODS USED
Tests on Liquid Effluents
     1.  Alkalinity was determined by a modification of the standard
         methods to adapt to the high alkalinity and color encountered
         in some of the samples.  Titrant acid was 0.1 normal, end-
         points were taken at pH 8.8 and 4.25, using a standard poten-
         tiometric instrument.  Sample size was adjusted to obtain
         titrations between 10 and 25 ml.  Results were calculated to
         mg/1 as CaC03.

     2.  Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD5) was determined by the azide
         modification described in "Standard Methods for the Examination
         of Water and Wastewater," 12th Edition, and dissolved oxygen
         was determined by the probe method, using a 451 temperature-
         compensated probe with electric stirrer.

     3.  Calcium was determined by EDTA titration, using Chrome Black T
         indicator.  Samples were acidified with a few drops of HC1;
         highly colored samples were then treated briefly with activated
         carbon and filtered; one ml of cone. NH*OH was added to obtain
         suitable pH.  (Samples from the color cTarifier were obtained
         from clear, supernatant liquid, since dissolved calcium was
         desired.)

     4.  Color determinations were made after filtering the sample through
         an 0.8 micron membrane filter, diluting as needed to bring below
         500 color value, adjusting pH to 7.6, and reading absorbance
         with a Spectronic 70 spectrophotometer with round, 19mm cu-
         vettes, cgmparing with a curve developed against a standard
         APHA platinum-cobalt solution.

     5.  Total organic carbon (TOC) was determined with a Beckman 915
         analyzer using the procedures described in the EPA manual,
         "Methods for Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastes," 1971,
         p. 221.

     6.  Sodium was determined by an Instrumentation Laboratories
    !     Model 143 flame photometer and reported as equivalent
         in mg/1.

Tests on Lime and Sludges.

     1.  Solids content of sludges, including centrate  liquid, were
         determined by weighing about 25 grams into an  aluminum, dis-


                                   119

-------
    posable dish, drying overnight at 105°C.  and reweighing.
    Dissolved solids are included in this measurement, commonly
    amounting to about 0.1% to 0.2%.  Because of the solids ranges
    involved in this study, the error was considered acceptable.
    (For more dilute slurries, a parallel determination of dissolved
    solids would be required for correction.)

2.  Available lime was determined by a modified Scaife method,
    whereby:

    (a) 1.42 grams of finely ground lime is weighed into a 500ml
        volumetric flask and a duplicate sample into a 400ml  beaker.

    (b) 200ml of distilled water is added to  each and boiled  for
        5-10 minutes.

    >(c) The contents of the beaker are titrated with 1.0 Normal
        HC1 and the acid volume noted.  5ml less of the same  acid
        is added to the  volumetric  flask, which is then diluted  to
        the mark and settled.

    (d) From the clear supernate in the flask, 200ml is withdrawn
        and titrated against 0.2 Normal HC1.

        2 (ml 1.0 N acid) + (ml 0.2 N)  =  %  Available CaO

3.  Causticizing value of lime is determined  as follows:

    (a) Dissolve 190 grams of soda ash in 1,800ml of distilled
        water in a 2-liter beaker and bring to a boil.

    (b) Cool slightly, and slowly add 100 grams of the lime
        sample.  Boil for 15 minutes, adding  water to maintain
        the level in the beaker.

    (c) Remove the beaker from heat, stir briefly, reverse
        stirring motion to stop swirling, and allow to settle.
        Record time to reach 50% of depth.

    (d) When well settled, pipette 5ml of supernatant liquid
        into a flask and titrate with 1.0 N HC1 to the phenol-
        phthalein and methyl orange end-points ("P" and "M").
    (e) Calculate:
                   % Causticizing Value  =  2 P"M
                                            0.01M
                              120

-------
                                                                 APPENDIX D

                                            MONTHLY  DATA TABULATIONS (TYPICAL  MONTH)
                                               1.  WATER QIUUTX MIA
                                                                      «*«'  Jo/rtF,
                                                                                    "'«"'
                                                                                     DCPT
                         AUMLDOTI
                 m
               P-H
           TO CARB'N
            P-M
              OUT
             P-M
                                                     COLOR
                                              JB_
        TO
      CAHB'M
                                                           OOT
                                                                     T.O.C.
                                                                  _ffi_
                                                                                       OPT
                                                                                              COD
                          HI/OPT
 FINAL
EFFLUQtT

  TDS
(13)
 KMhOh
 DEKAND

 M!SSL
SDLPATB


 IB/OW
                                                            JA.
                                                    ^ft
               «- tie
                                             */«*o
                                                                        _io_
              -0-^.gP
                        To -
                           ±i
                                       ••<^o
                                                            >f-j.ao
                      IfS-
       ^£_
/ft/
                                                                  /gJ~
              0 - f±/>
                                    160 -A A a
                                                                  ife
               L- fflg
          770 -
              ^
y/p
                      i
                                         1 o
                                                                   IAI
                                                                                /n
                                                                                       16
                                        3fe
                                                                                zt
                        4,3.0 -  lfO
                                    -30-.
                                                       ""
                                                                                       yjTP
                              13 O
                                                           II IO
              zU
                                     7e -&tg
                                                            ^JO
                        & /A - 12. D
                                       -JLTO
                                                      140
                                                                         IAO
               o -a.au
                                      i -.370
                                                            t&
                                                                          I4D
ro
               O-A/O
                                                                                       /ZT
 HHi
                                     IIO-tK>O
                                                                          '
^go -i
                                     fn-S-tO
                                                                                      J /J*
                         7J/J -
                                     to-tlo
                                                     IAD
                                                            •760
                                                                  SSI
                                                                                       418
               0 -3-
                         •Jfe- IIto
                                     la -J.
                                              /jrt/o
                                                      J« e
                                                                                      fttf
                                     J. 6 -SJ-O
                                                     ^AJ-
                                                                         /£*,
                                                                                      333
               g-
              -JSj^
                         y^<> -^
                                       /4^Q
                                       "To"
                                    ae
                     LtZi
                                                    ^A4L
               o - AaO
                                     ItO -
                                                            Aid
                                                                         It 
-------
ro
                                                                           COLOR REMOVAL PROCESS DATA
                                     RAW WASTE
                            KLLLIOK
                            GALLONS
                             -
                     .2.3..
                                                             7, c/
                      tf-l-
                                                            e. .!•£>
                                                                     J.C
                                                                     //f
                                                                      n.i
                                                                            Carb'n
                                                                              //. c
                                                                              ic.S
                                                                              ID.tl
                                                                              lt.«
                                                                             n-o
                                                                              //.a
                                                                             • i.f
                              f-
                             ^t
                                                                              /O.
                                                                             J±£
                                                                              1. /
                                                                              Jt.'J
                                                                              11.3
                                                                                     Otttlat
                                                                                                    Ca+ «£ CaO
                                               Raw
                                              Wast.
                                                                                              VO
  To
Carb'n
 To
5atlai_
                                                                                                         lt.
                                                                                                      JLS6
                                                                                                      Afk
                                                                                                      -3«*
                                                               t*jf
                                                                                                               /so
                                                                                                               too
                                                                                                               >Z2-
                                                                                                               tAS
                                                                                                               Il
                                                                                                               //O
KRAFT
Paper

 Tons
  NSSC
Cor. M«d.

  Tons
                                                                                 VI
                   Iff
                   eii-
                                                                                                                        110
                                                                                                                        Aft
                                                                                                                       jj2_
                                                                                                                       fttf
                                                                                                                       4&Z
                                                                                                                       fOtf
                                                                                                                        131-
                                                                                                                       ^Kr
                                                                                         A
-------
ro
CO
SCREW

 SM
                    10
                   _/!_
                                                      jr. UMS RED AKD CKNTHTOS DATA
                                                                                             MONTH
SLAKER

£8L
                          .££_
                           qj
                           *f
                           3£
                           -3JCL.
^
                           
-------
ro
                                                              KILN OPERATION BATA
                                                                                                                                        ' ' *«•'
                                                                                                                                         DEPt
SLUDGE FILTER COS
     H*** A BH
4 SOLIDS I
                     6,1,0  I   f.&O
                  &
                  »
                                      Free CaO
                                        , SCI
                     ii.C
                              £.£   '•   ,CO;S
                              a.7
                     fe/.o
                     5"7.C     A.SJ"
                                        ,p^5'
                    -J2.
                        ;i  i   5i&   i  :
                                         M.7
                      ^.e
                      SS.S
                                    AVAIL.
                                   CaO. i
                                                             7.1.
                                                            Ti.O
                                                            80.0
                                                            s/.c
                                                                         KILN PRODUCT ANALYSIS
CAUST'G
EFF'Y.4
sem,.
 RATE
> ACID
IHSOL.
> LOSS
ON ION.
                                                                                                              LDIB
                                                                                                              LOSS.
                                                                                                              LBS.
n>

 GRITS
DISCARD
 CU.FT.
                                                                                                    .^aoji.
GAS
US3D
MCF
                                                                                                                              ;aj-i
                                                                                                                             AS-iO
                                                                                                                              it^g
                                                                                                                              s-lio
                                                                                                                              AIJ.O
 SCRD3
 WATER
GPL S.S.
                                                                                                                                      ¥7,0
                                                                                                                                         . *•
                                                                                                                                          0
                                                                                                                                                             -"-\

-------
  SELECTED WATER
  RESOURCES ABSTRACTS

  INPUT TRANSACTION FORM
1. Rept ft No.
3.  Accession No.
                    w
  4.  Title
           COLOR REMOVAL AND SLUDGE  DISPOSAL
           PROCESS FOR KRAFT MILL  EFFLUENTS
  7. Author(s)
                    5.  Report D&tt

                    6,

                    S.  Performing
                       Report No.
           Edgar L. Spruill, Jr.
  9.  Organization
                    10.  Project No.

                       12040  DRY
           Continental Can Company,  Inc.
           Mill Operations Division
           Hodge, Louisiana  71247
                                                                  11.  Contract/Grant No.
                   H3.  Type ef Report and
                   )    Period Covered
  12. Sponsoring Organization
  IS.  Supplementary Notes

      Environmental Protection Agency report  number, EPA-660/2-7^-008, February
 '16.  Abstract
     A treatment plant,  removing color by lime addition and recovering  sludges,  has been
treating over 80% of the effluent of an unbleached kraft mill for one year.   Using up to
1,100 mg/1 of CaO, with  normal  mill  fiber loss as a precipitation aid,  average color
reduction was 80% for  all-kraft effluent.  At upper range of lime dosage,  when residual
dissolved Ca was above 400  mg/1  as CaO, color removal was 85-93%.  When mill  production
included 33-40% NSSC hardwood pulp,  color reduction averaged only 65%.
     About 12% BODg reduction was observed, and average TOC reduction was  nearly 40%.
The chief negative factor is  need for emergency protection against alkaline  impact on
secondary treatment and  receiving stream.
     Following centrifuge dewatering, sludge incineration has had minimal  impact on
kiln operation; there  were  some adverse effects on lime quality.  Lime  recovery was 93%.
Mill kiln capacity must  be  increased about 25%.
     Primary clarification  and sludge disposal are included in the process.   Operating
costs, exclusive of capital  factors, are estimated at $0.50-$0.80 per ton  of paper, or
5.5$ to 6.5$ per thousand gallons, depending on fiber losses and water  usage.
  17a. Descriptors
           *Pulp  and  Paper Industry, *Waste water treatment, *Chemical  Precipitation,
           *Lime, *Color,  *Sludge Disposal, Physical Properties, Centrifugation,
            Dewatering,  Incineration ..'Ultimate Disposal, Costs.
  17b. Identifiers
           *Lime Treatment,  *Color Removal, Kraft Effluent,
            Kraft Sludge  Disposal
  17 c. COWRR Field & Group
IS. Availability
19. * Sf'ittrity Class..
(Keport)
20. Security Class. •
•
-------