United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Industrial Environmental Research
Laboratory
Cincinnati OH 45268
EPA 600 2-78-215
October 1978
Research and Development
Assessment of
Potential Toxic
Releases from
Leather  Industry
Dyeing Operations

-------
                RESEARCH REPORTING SERIES

Research reports of the Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency,  have been grouped into nine series. These nine broad cate-
gories were established to facilitate further development and application of en-
vironmental technology.  Elimination  of  traditional grouping was consciously
planned to foster technology transfer and a maximum interface in related fields.
The nine series are:

      1.   Environmental Health Effects Research
      2.   Environmental Protection Technology
      3.   Ecological Research
      4.   Environmental Monitoring
      5.   Socioeconomic Environmental Studies
      6.   Scientific and Technical Assessment Reports (STAR)
      7   Interagency Energy-Environment Research and Development
      8.   "Special" Reports
      9.   Miscellaneous Reports

This report has been assigned to the ECOLOGICAL RESEARCH series. This series
describes research on the effects of pollution on humans, plant and animal spe-
cies, and materials. Problems are assessed for their long- and short-term influ-
ences. Investigations include formation, transport, and pathway studies to deter-
mine the fate of pollutants and their effects. This work provides the technical basis
for setting standards to minimize undesirable changes in living organisms in the
aquatic, terrestrial, and atmospheric environments.
 This document is available to the public through the National Technical Informa-
 tion Service, Springfield, Virginia 22161.

-------
                                                EPA-600/2-78-215
                                                October 1978
ASSESSMENT OF POTENTIAL TOXIC RELEASES FROM LEATHER
            INDUSTRY DYEING OPERATIONS
                         by

                   S. B. Radding
                    J. L. Jones
                    W. R. Mabey
                     D. H. Liu
                    N. Bohonos
                 SRI International
           Menlo Park, California 94025
               Grant No. 804642-01-2
                  Project Officer

                  Kenneth Dostal
       Industrial Pollution Control Division
   Industrial Environmental Research Laboratory
              Cincinnati, Ohio 45268
   INDUSTRIAL ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LABORATORY
        OFFICE OF RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
       U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
              CINCINNATI, OHIO 45268

-------
                               DISCLAIMER
     This report has been reviewed by the Industrial Environmental
Research Laboratory, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,  and approved
for publication.  Approval does not signify that the contents necessarily
reflect the views and policies of the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, nor does mention of trade names or commercial products constitute
endorsement or recommendation for use.
                                    ii

-------
                                 FOREWORD
     When energy and material resources are extracted, processed, converted,
and used, the related pollutional impacts on our environment and even on
our health often require that new and increasingly more efficient pollution
control methods be used.  The Industrial Environmental Research Laboratory-
Cincinnati (lERL-Ci) assists in developing and demonstrating new and
improved methodologies that will meet these needs efficiently and
economically.

     The report briefly describes the leather tanning industry including
the various sources of emissions.  An attempt was made to assess the
seriousness of the potential for toxic pollutant releases from the dyeing
of leather.  For further information on this project contact the Food and
Wood Products Branch, Industrial Pollution Control Division, Industrial
Environmental Research Laboratory-Cincinnati.
                                    David G. Stephan
                                        Director
                     Industrial Environmental Research Laboratory
                                      Cincinnati
                                     iii

-------
                               ABSTRACT
     This study focused on the organic dyes released to the environment
in the wastewaters from leather dyeing operations.  Basically, three types
of dyes—acid, basic, and direct—are used, although the number of dif-
ferent dyes are well over 50, and the number of formulations used at a
single tannery over the period of several years can be greater than 100.
Tannery wastewaters are complex mixtures which for the most part are
discharged directly into municipal sewers.  The character of this dis-
charge will differ hourly depending on the operation performed since
tanning operations are batch mode.  Estimates based on information from
suppliers and tanners were made of the probable discharge of dyes in
wastewater.  The literature search revealed little or no data on the
fate of these dyes in the environment.  From consideration of the physical
and chemical properties of the dyes, biosorption (complexing with pro-
teinaceous material) appears to be the most likely mechanism for removal
of dyes in biological wastewater treatment systems.

     This report was submitted in fulfillment of Grant No. R 804642-01-2
by SRI International under the sponsorship of the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency.  This report covers the period 1 June 1977 to
28 April 1978 and was completed as of 28 April 1978.
                                    iv

-------
                              CONTENTS
Foreword	
Abstract   	
Figures    	
Tables  	

     1.  INTRODUCTION  	
     2.  SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS    	
     3.  GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF INDUSTRY 	
     4.  CHARACTERISTICS OF THE INDUSTRY 	
         Size and Structure  .  	
         Environmental Impacts  	
         Beamhouse Process   	
         Tanhouse Process	  .   .
         Retan, Color, Fatliquor Process 	
         Finishing Process   	
         Raw Materials 	
         Pollutant Sources   	
     5.  LEATHER DYEING   	
         The Dyeing Process	
         Data Acquisition 	
         Tannery Effluent Characteristics and Treatment
         Dye Removal in Wastewater Treatment
     6.  TOXICITY AND ENVIRONMENTAL FATE OF DYES  .   .
         Toxicity of Dyes 	
              Toxicity to Aquatic  Organisms ....
              Potential Human Health Effects.
         Environmental Fate  	
              Physical Properties   	
              Chemical Transformation  	
              Physical Transport    	

References 	
Appendices
     A.  DYES USED IN THE LEATHER INDUSTRY  ....
     B.  BIODEGRADATION OF DYES IN BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT
              SYSTEMS  	  	
iii
 iv
 vi
vii

  1
 , 2
  4
  6
  6
  6
 17
 17
 18
 19
 19
 22
 31
 31
 32
 35
 37
 43
 43
 43
 46
 47
 47
 47
 50

 51

 53

 62

-------
                                 FIGURES

1    Flow Diagram for Leather Tanning Process 	        23
2    The Uptake of Dye in Leather as a Function of pH	        33
3    Effluent Treatment for a Complete Chrome Tannery  	        40
4    Estimates of BOD,., COD, and TOC of Effluent Streams
     of Tannery	        41
                                   vi

-------
                                 TABLES
 1    Statistics for Leather Tanning and Finishing Industry ...        7
 2    1976 Production Rates in Equivalent Chrome Grain
      Cattle Hides  	        8
 3    1976 Production Rates in Equivalent Vegetable  Tanned
      Cattle Hides  	        9
 4    1976 Production Rates in Equivalent Sheep Hides 	       10
 5    1976 Production Rates in Equivalent Split Chrome
      Leather Hides 	       11
 6    1976 Production Rates in Equivalent Blue Hides  	       12
 7    1976 Production Rates in Equivalent Retan /Finisher Hides .       13
 8    1976 Production Equivalent Finished Hides 	       14
 9    Suppliers of Chemicals to the Tanning Industry  	       20
10    Suppliers of Hides and Skins	       21
11    Chemicals Used in Leather Processing  ..... 	       24
12    Estimates of Selected Chemical Usage and Losses for
      Leather Tanning and Finishing 	       28
13    Survey of the Leather Industry Tannery  	       34
14    Estimated Effluent Stream Load from a 1000 Cattle Hide/Day
      Tannery (60 Ib Green Salted Cattle Hide)  	       36
15    Concentration of Dyes in Waste Streams	       38
16    Toxicity of Acid, Basic, and Direct Dyes to the Green
      Alga, Selenastrum Capricornutum 	       44
17    Toxicity of Acid, Basic, and Direct Dyes to the Fathead
      Minnow, Pimephales Promelas 	       45
18    Photolysis of Dyes	       49
19    Some Dyes Used in the Leather Industry	       54
                                   vii

-------
                              SECTION 1

                             INTRODUCTION
     This report describes a study undertaken to assess the seriousness
of the potential for toxic pollutant releases from the dyeing of leather.
Heretofore, most studies of pollution problems of this industry have
focused on the problems associated with the high BOD suspended material,
and chrome chemicals in the effluent.  This work focuses only on organic
dyes.

     As background, the report briefly describes the industry structure;
the processing operations; the types of raw materials required; the po-
tential process sources of emissions to air, water, and the land; and
the environmental control practices.

-------
                               SECTION 2

                        SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
     This study focused on the organic dyes released to the environment
in the wastewaters from leather dyeing operations.  These dyes have been
of concern as a health hazard to workers.  A report just released by the
National Institutes of Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH, 1977)
reports a striking increase in bladder cancer among both male and female
leather workers, and previous studies indicate that the disease may be
dye-related.

     The dye types used by the leather industry include acid, basic,
direct, and metallized dyes.  The predominant dyes, however, are the
acid and direct dyes.  As many as 100 different dye formulations can be
used in one plant.  More than 50 dyes have been identified by eight major
suppliers and from inventory lists of tanneries as used by the leather
industry.  Of these, 49 are listed in this report with structural formulas
which indicate the wide range of materials involved.

     Tannery wastewaters are complex mixtures of relatively unknown com-
position.  Until recently, there had been no scientific assessment of the
effluents, and even today, little work is being done to characterize the
waste streams.

     Most tanneries (90% of the tanners and 80% of the industry's waste-
water) discharge their effluent streams directly into municipal sewers.
The character of the waste stream depends on the particular operation
being performed at that time, since tannery operations are batch mode and
vary from day to day.

     The chrome chemicals used in dyeing are a well-documented source of
toxic materials.  However, the industry has made an effort to recover or
remove the chrome chemicals and many effluent streams are now low in
chromium.

     An extensive literature search and contacts with trade associations,
tanners (4 site visits), and dye producers revealed that very little infor-
mation is  available (or known) on the amount of specific leather dyes
released and the biodegradation of such dyes.

     Even without the dyeing operation, the waste streams are highly
colored, and since combinations of dyes are often used, analysis of waste
streams is extremely difficult and costly.

     From SRI estimates of thefitotal dye usage by producers and tanners
CW x 10  Ibs/year or 3.2 x 10  kg/year) and the average uptake for dyes
(60-85%), it was estimated that total leather dye releases may range
from 1.1-2.8 x 10  Ibs/year or 0.5-1.3 x 10  kg/year.  Using typical values
for dye usage per hide and average wastewater flow figures, it was
estimated that the actual concentration of dyes (25-50 mg/£) in a tannery

-------
wastewater stream may be equivalent  to roughly  50-100 mg/£  of  chemical
oxygen demand  (COD) out of a  total raw wastewater  COD of  1000  to  2000 mg/£.
No useful quantitative information was obtained on the  effectiveness for
dye removal of wastewater treatment  processes now  used  in the  industry  or
by municipalities treating leather dyeing wastewaters.  From a review of
the literature on biodegradability of dyes,  it  appears  that biodegradation
of the dyes is unlikely to be a major mechanism for removal.   It  is
generally assumed that performance requirements of permanent dyes is that
they resist degradation under aerobic conditions;  little  is known about
their anaerobic degradation.   The biodegradation of dyes  is further com-
plicated by the batch mode of operation, which  results  in a wide  fluctua-
tion in the concentration of  dye in  the waste stream and  thus  may make  it
difficult to maintain adapted organisms for  the degradation of dyes.
Available data on the biodegradation of dyes have  been  culled  mostly from
the textile industry.


     Removal of dyes by biosorption  (perhaps by reaction  with  proteinaceous
cellular material) may be the major  mechanism for  removal of dyes in
activated sludge or trickling filter treatment  plants.  A similar mechanism
may be responsible for any removal that occurs  in  primary clarifiers where
suspended matter in the wastewater is composed  of  proteinaceous matter
 (hair and hide scraps).  Dyes may thus be disposed of with  the waste
sludges.

     The presence of proteins and chrome chemicals in tannery  wastewater
will most likely lead to changes in  the pattern of biodegradation.  Depend-
ing on the complexing, the toxicology of the dyes  may also  vary.

     The probable fate for the general case  of  dyes introduced into
aquatic environments  is to remain in solution with sorption onto  sediments
and biota eventually  occurring.  Chemical processes or  volatilization of
dyes do not appear to be generally important fate  processes.   Long-term
biodegradation probably does  eventually transform  most  dyes, but  in the
absence of relevant data,  such processes cannot be evaluated quantitatively.

     The lack  of sufficient data on  the types and  concentrations  of dyes
and  the effects of other materials present in tannery effluents on the
 toxicology and degradation of the dyes, indicates  that  considerably more
work will be necessary to  clarify the nature and seriousness of the dye
 release problem from  the leather tanning industry.

     Future EPA research work should address the following:

      •  Effluent streams need to be  analyzed for specific components
        including dyes.

        Experimental  studies  of the  fate of  dyes in various types of
        existing wastewater treatment  systems need to be  undertaken.

      •  An obvious approach to solution of the  potential  dye release
        problem is to  segregate the  wastewater  streams  that contain
        dyes and treat them separately.  The technical  and  economic
        feasibility of this approach needs to be investigated.

-------
                               SECTION 3

                   GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF INDUSTRY
     The leather industry incorporates the tanners, the manufacturers of
leather goods, and the suppliers of materials for both.  The tanners and
suppliers are limited in number, so statistics are aggregated, and much
of the information is proprietary and secret, and, therefore, difficult
to obtain.

     It has been estimated that 25 million hides were processed in 1976,
up from 22 million in 1975.  Artificial leathers are not included in
these numbers.  The number of tanneries has steadily decreased from 7,500
in 1875 to approximately 520 establishments, including firms engaged in
finishing operations on leathers tanned elsewhere.

     The leather tanning and finishing industry consists of a variety of
firms.  Firm ownership ranges from family-owned companies and closely
held corporations to divisions of large conglomerates.  Information re-
garding operating procedures is closely held or combined with other oper-
ating information of the large corporations where segregation of data is
not possible.  Many of the formulations used are proprietary, and a com-
plete breakdown as to product composition is not possible.

     Most of the tanning and finishing firms are located in the North-
eastern region of the country.  Historically, tanneries were located near
the source of hides, and it appears this may hold true for new plants.
The major categories of hides used today are cattle  and calfskins; sheep
and lambskins; goat and kidskins; pigskins; horsehides; and deer and elk
skins.

     Tanners are clustered principally in the New England states, Mid-
Atlantic states, Gloversvilie-Johnstown in New York, and the Chicago-
Milwaukee area, although others are scattered throughout the country.
Most of the establishments are family-owned.  Tanners are classified as:

     (1)  Regular tanneries

     (2)  Converters

-------
     (3)  Contract tanners.

     The export of hides for tanning has steadily increased,  more than
doubling since 1960.  In 1972, over 47 percent of the hides were exported.
These hides are processed to at least a salt-cured stage before shipment.

-------
                               SECTION 4

                   CHARACTERISTICS OF THE INDUSTRY
SIZE AND STRUCTURE

     Of the 517 establishments in the industry in 1972, 223 had 20 or
more employees, and the industry had a total of 25,700 employees.
Table 1 shows several categories of statistics on the industry.  Data
for the 1976 production of leather by U.S. tanneries have been compiled
by states.  Where fewer than three units existed in any one state, the
production rates of several states are then combined (Tables 2 and 3).
The production in equivalent hides of chrome grain leather of all types
and vegetable tanned leather all utilize cattle raw material.  Table 4
shows the production of equivalent sheep hides by state.

     A number of plants do not process the raw hides, but do split,
chrome tan, retan, and/or finish the hides.  Data on these are given in
Tables 5, 6, 7, and 8.  These operations should not be counted in the
total production, since this would result in double counting.

Environmental Impacts

     Processing Operations

     There are four steps in processing hides:  beamhouse; tanhouse;
retan, color, and fatliquor; and finishing.  The beamhouse process is
not used in sheepskins or pigskin tanning and finishing, and the other
processes will vary somewhat.  For example, the fleshing step, which is
performed in the beamhouse process for cattlehides, is carried out in
the tanhouse process for sheepskins.  Sheepskins are not always dehaired,
but they are decreased.  Essentially the processing follows the steps
outlined below.

     Beamhouse Process

     (1)  Receiving - Nearly all cattlehides received at tanneries are
          either cured green salted or brined hides, with brined hides
          predominating.  In a few isolated cases where transit time is
   Source:  "Development Document for Effluent Limitations Guidelines and
   New Source Performance Standards for Leather Tanning and Finishing,"
   EPA-440/l-74-016a, March 1974.

-------
                   TABLE 1.  STATISTICS FOR LEATHER TANNING AND FINISHING INDUSTRY
                                                (1972)

No. of
establishments
With 20
employ-
ees or
Total more
517 223
All employees
Number Payroll
(103) ($106)
25.7 200.0
Production workers Value
Man- added by
Number hours Wages manufacture
(103) (106) ($106) ($106)
22.1 41.9 $151.3 $368.3
Cost of
materials,
fuels, etc.
($106)
$708.0
Value of
industry
shipments
($106)
$1,059.5

Source:  U.S. Department of Commerce, Census of Manufacturers.  1972.

-------
TABLE 2.  1976 PRODUCTION RATES IN EQUIVALENT
             CHROME GRAIN CATTLE HIDES*

States
California
Tennessee
Wisconsin
Illinois
Michigan
Pennsylvania
Massachusetts
New York
New Jersey
Maine
New Hampshire
Oregon
Alaska
Washington
Colorado
Utah
Minnesota
Nebraska
Missouri
Louisiana
Florida
Virginia
Delaware
Ohio
Vermont
Maryland
TOTAL
No. of
plants
7
6
12
6
3
4
11
12
4
5
4
3
1|
2
2)
M
2
if
2/
1)
2
l)
M
1
l|
ll

Production
1,404,114
821,516
3,959,529
772,757
1,449,183
733,627
1,706,850
1,317,530
577,251
2,023,458
1,080,291
95,000

64,000


1,015,638



33,152


437,386


17,491,282

                              2
*  One equivalent hide =» 40 ft  of leather (3.72 sq.m).
Source:  Tanners1 Council of America, Inc., 1977.

-------
TABLE 3.  1976 PRODUCTION BATES IN EQUIVALENT
       VEGETABLE TANNED CATTLE HIDES*
    States
No. of
Plants
Production
Kentucky

Pennsylvania

Indiana
Ohio

Virginia
West Virginia
North Carolina

Georgia
Tennessee
Texas
Oregon

  TOTAL
              490,750

              925,043

              101,841


            1,000,271



              535,371



            3,053,276
*  One equivalent hide =-40 ft  leather (3.72  sq.m).
Source:  Tanners' Council of America, Inc., 1977.

-------
     TABLE 4.  1976 PRODUCTION RATES IN
         EQUIVALENT SHEE? HIDES

No. of
States plants Production
Massachusetts 13
New York 16
New Hampshire 4
Maine 4
Colorado 1
New Jersey 1
Texas 1
Pennsylvania 2
Florida 1
Wisconsin 1 '
TOTAL
850
1,140
416
383

147

2,939
,592
,544
,044
,677

,429

,286

*  One equivalent hide —40 ft  leather (3.72 sq.m)
Source:  Tanners' Council of America, Inc., 1977.
                      10

-------
TABLE 5.  1976 PRODUCTION RATES IN EQUIVALENT SPLIT
             CHROME LEATHER HIDES*

States
Massachusetts
Wisconsin
California
Illinois
New Hamshire
TOTAL
No. of
plants
13
5
il
Production
1,218,183
1,394,605
957,827
3,570,615

                              2
*  One equivalent hide =^40 ft  leather (3.72  sq.m).
Source:  Tanners' Council of America, Inc., 1977.
                        11

-------
TABLE 6.  1976 PRODUCTION RATES IN EQUIVALENT
                BLUE HIDES**
   States
No. of
plants
Production
Colorado
Arizona
Iowa
Minnesota
Missouri
New Jersey
Massachusetts

  TOTAL
   1 ^
   1
   2
   1
   1
   1
   1
2,181,000
            2,181,000
*  One equivalent hide =*• 40 ft  leather (3.72 sq.m),
t  "Blue" usually is applied to hides or skins
   that have been chrome-tanned but not dyed or
   fat-liquored.
Source:  Tanners' Council of America, Inc., 1977.
                      12

-------
TABLE 7.  1976 PRODUCTION RATES IN EQUIVALENT
           RETAN/FINISHER HIDES*"''

States
Pennsylvania
Massachusetts
New York
New Jersey
California
Tennessee
Wisconsin
TOTAL
No. of
plants
3
6
3
3
11
Production
95,000
720,000
255,000
80,000
731,254
1,881,254

*  One equivalent hide =-40  ft2  leather  (3/72  sq.m).
t  Retan/finishers perform only  the  last  retan
   and finishing operations.  The  raw materials
   for these operations are  the  chrome or vege-
   table tanned hides.
Source:  Tanners' Council of America, Inc., 1977.
                       13

-------
    TABLE 8.  1976 PRODUCTION EQUIVALENT
             FINISHED HIDES* t
  States
No. of
plants
Production
Massachusetts
New York
New Jersey
Ohio
California
Tennessee
Delaware
North Carolina
New Hampshire
Wisconsin

  TOTAL
  22

  12

  10

   3

   1
   1
   2
   1
   1
2,550,000
1,075,000
  482,356

   57,981


  615,000
            4,780,337
*  One equivalent hide = 40 ft  leather  (3.72 sq.m).
t  Finishers work only on the surface of
   tanned grain or split leather to give a
   uniform finish to the leather.
Source:  Tanners' Council of America, Inc.,  1977.
                      14

-------
    short, green hides without prior curing have been sent di-
    rectly from a packer to a tannery and processed.  Green hides,
    after trimming and grading, are cured at  the packing house by
    spreading the hides, flesh side up, and covering them with salt.
    This process continues until a pack of hides about 5 to 6 feet
    high is obtained.  A heavy layer of salt  is placed over the top
    layer of hides.  The natural liquid of the hides dissolve a
    portion of the salt to form a brine.  In  this process, salt is
    absorbed and, by diffusion and osmosis, causes a reduction of
    the moisture content in the hide.  After  10 to 30 days from the
    date the pack is closed, the hides are considered adequately
    cured.  Each hide is shaken to get rid of excess salt and is
    folded individually; the hides are shipped in packs, either to
    tanneries or to warehouses for storage.   The size of the pack
    depends on a number of variables, such as size of the packing
    house, size of shipments, and the method  of shipment.  Brined
    hides are prepared at the packing house or at a separate hide
    processing facility by agitating fresh hides in a saturated
    brine solution until the salt has replaced the desired amount
    of moisture within the hide.  In this process, hides are also
    cleaned by removal of manure and other attached foreign matter.
    Hides are then removed, drained, and bundled in a manner simi-
    lar  to that used for green salted hides.  Hides may be fleshed
    before or after brining.  "Safety salt" is usually sprinkled
    on each hide before shipment.  The brining process takes two
    to three days, which makes it attractive  to the packer or hide
    curing establishment, since there is no need to hold a large
    inventory of hides.  The brining process  is preferred by most
    tanners and packers since it tends to produce cleaner hides.

(2)  Storage - Hides are normally stored at the tannery in the pack
    as received.  No special storage conditions are maintained in
    most tanneries other than that required to keep hides at the
    moisture content as received.

(3)  Siding and Trimming - The usual first step in the processing
    of hides from storage at the tanner is to open a folded hide
    and  trim it.  The hides then may be cut in half along the back-
    bone, which is referred to as halving or  siding.  Sometimes
    hides are halved after unhairing or tanning.

    Sides are usually palletized for transporting to the next step
    in the process.  Trimmings are collected  for shipment to glue
    or other by-product manufacturers.
                                15

-------
(4)   Washing and Soaking - Sides (or in some cases whole hides)
     from the siding and trimming operation are placed in vats
     (with or without paddles), drums, or hide processors (con-
     crete mixers with special linings) for washing and soaking
     to restore moisture.  Water usage is generally less with
     hide processors, although some tannery people have expressed
     the opinion that equivalent reduction in water use can be
     achieved with drums.  This process removes dirt, salt, blood,
     manure, and nonfibrous proteins from the hides.  The quan-
     tity of such waste material varies, depending on the time
     of year and the source of the hides.  Depending on the type
     of leather produced, additional washes (rinses) may also
     occur at several other points in the tanning process, in-
     cluding after liming and dehairing, after bating, after tan-
     ning, and prior to and following coloring.

(5)   Fleshing - Fleshing is the removal of attached adipose fatty
     tissue and meat that have been left on the hide at the pack-
     ing house.  It is done on a fleshing machine, in which the
     hide is carried through rolls and across rotating spiral
     blades that remove the flesh from the hide.  Cold water is
     necessary to keep the fat congealed, but the fat represents
     an additional waste disposal load.  Most hides are fleshed
     at the packing house or at a separate hide processing fa-
     cility, particularly in the case of brined hides.  When flesh
     is removed prior to liming it is referred to as green flesh-
     ing; when it is performed after liming it is referred to as
     lime fleshing.  In any case, fleshings are normally recovered
     and sold to plants for rendering or conversion to glue.  If
     fleshings are properly handled, there is very little liquid
     or solid waste contribution from this operation.

(6)   Unhairing - Hair is removed by chemical loosening followed
     by either machine pulling or chemical dissolution of the
     hair.  Machine removal is practiced when the processor de-
     sires to recover the hair.  The dissolving process is referred
     to as "pulping" or "burning."

     For either type of unhairing, the hides are placed in vats
     (with or without paddles), drums, or hide processors with a
     lime slurry to which sharpeners such as sodium sulfide and
     sodium sulfhydrate are added.  When the hair is to be saved,
     the strength of the solution and the time in contact with
     the hide is limited to that necessary to loosen the hair
     sufficiently for mechanical pulling.  If the hair is to be
                                16

-------
     pulped, stronger solutions and/or longer time cycles are
     used and the hair may be totally dissolved.

     Sometimes hides are relimed to make the hide swell for easier
     splitting.  In a save-hair operation, flesh and hair removal
     is sometimes followed by a "scudding" step to ensure removal
     of hair roots and fine hairs.

     The liming and unhairing process is one of the principal
     contributors to the waste effluent.  In a save-hair operation
     with good recovery of hair, the contribution to the effluent
     is substantially lower than in the pulp hair operation.

Tanhouse Process

(1)  Bating - Bating is the first step in preparing the stock for
     the tanning process.  It may be done in either vats (with or
     without paddles), drums, or hide processors.  The hides are
     placed in the processing equipment, which contains a solution
     of ammonium salts and enzymes.  The purpose of this operation
     is to:

     a.  De-lime skins.

     b.  Reduce swelling.

     c.  Peptize fibers.

     d.  Remove protein degradation products.

(2)  Pickling - The pickling subprocess follows the bating step
     and is normally done in the same equipment.  A brine and an
     acid solution is used to bring the hides to an acid condition
     in preparation for subsequent tanning subprocesses.  In addi-
     tion to conditioning the hide for receiving the tanning agent,
     this step prevents precipitation of chromium salts.  Pickling
     is always done before the chrome tanning process and may be
     done before vegetable tanning.

(3)  Tanning - Nearly all cattlehides in this country are either
     chrome or vegetable tanned; very little is tanned with alum
     or other tanning materials.

     Vegetable tanning is the older process, and is performed in
     a solution containing plant extracts such as vegetable tan-
     nings.  This method is usually used for the heavy leathers

                                17

-------
     such as  sole leather,  mechanical leathers, and saddle leathers.
     Shoe upper leathers  and other lighter leathers are usually
     chrome tanned by immersion in a bath containing proprietary
     mixtures of basic chromium sulfate.

     Vegetable tanning is usually done in vats, principally because
     it requires longer process times, while chrome tanning takes
     place in drums or hide processors.

     In some cases, depending on the type of leather being produced,
     hides are tanned in  the tanhouse and later retanned as a part
     of the retan, color, fatliquor process.  Where different tan-
     ning agents are used in the initial  and retan steps, it is re-
     ferred to as combination tanning.

     Waste effluents from the tanning process are substantial.
     Recycle of vegetable tan solutions is becoming more common
     in the industry; that  which cannot be recycled may be used
     for retanning or may be evaporated and recovered.   Recycle and
     recovery of chrome tanning solutions is also practiced at a
     few locations.

(4)  Splitting - The tanned hide is split to produce a  grainside
     piece of essentially constant thickness and a flesh-side layer.
     The flesh-side layer or split can be processed separately or
     sold to split tanners.

Retan. Color. Fatliquor Process

(1)  Retan - Retanning is done principally to impart different
     characteristics in the finished leather that would be lacking
     if tanning were carried out in one step.  Retanning may use
     chrome, vegetable, or  synthetic tanning agents, and it is
     usually done in drums  immediately preceding coloring and fat-
     liquoring.

(2)  Bleaching - Bleaching  hides with sodium bicarbonate and sul-
     furic acid after tanning is commonly practiced in  the sole
     leather industry. Bleaching is done in vats or drums.

(3)  Coloring - Coloring  is done in the same drums as retanning,
     and may be done either before or after fatliquoring.  Natural
     dyes may be used, but  many synthetic products are  now avail-
     able for this purpose.
                                18

-------
     (4)   Fatllquoring is the operation in which oils are added to
          replace the natural oils lost in the beamhouse and tanhouse
          processes and to make the leather pliable.  The amount of oil
          added depends on the end use of the leather.

          Liquid wastes from the retan, color, and fatliquor process
          may be high volume-low strength compared with the other proc-
          esses.

     Finishing Process

     Finishing operations such as drying, wet-in coating, staking or
     tacking, and plating, which follow the wet processes, provide only
     minor contributions to the liquid waste.  These result primarily
     from cleanup of the paster drying plates and from paint spray booth
     water baths.  Trimmings are disposed as solid waste, and dust col-
     lected may be disposed in either wet or dry form.

     Raw Materials

     The production of synthetic tanning materials alone in 1974 was
estimated by the U.S. International Trade Commission at 60,570,000
pounds (27,531, 818 kg) for a total value of $16,031,000.  Table 9 lists
some of the manufacturers of these materials.

     Many of the products used in tanning and dyeing are proprietary
formulations and a complete breakdown as to product composition is not
possible.
                                   19

-------
    TABLE 9.  SUPPLIERS OF CHEMICALS TO THE TANNING INDUSTRY
Allied Chemical Corp.
American Cyanamid Co.
Atlas Refinery, Inc.
Barkey International Corp.
BASF Wyandotte Corp.,
  Carlstadt Leather Fin.
Birko Chemical Corp.
Chemical Coating
  Materials Co.
Ciba-Geigy Corporation
Eastern Industrial Oil Prod.
  Co., Div. of Henkel, Inc.
Industrial Chemical Co.
Kepec Chemical Co.
Kepec Div. of Hendel, Inc.
L. H. Lincoln & Son, Inc.
Marden-Wild Corporation
Diamond Shamrock, Napco
  Chemical Div.
A. J. & J. 0. Pilar, Inc.
Pilar River Plate Corp.
PPG Industries, Inc.
Prime Leather Finishers Co.
K. J. Quinn & Co., Inc.
Rohm & Haas Company
Salem Oil & Grease Co.
Sandoz Colors & Chemicals
Samuel Smidt Chemical
  Corp.
Stahl Finish - Beatrice Chem.
  Div. of Beatrice Foods Co.
Staley Chemical Division
Tac Tannins & Chemicals, Inc.
Arthur C. Trask Corp.
Union Carbide Corp.
Verona Dyestuff Div.,
  Mobay Chem. Corp.
Wayne Chemical Corp.
Weber fie Smith, Inc.
Whittemore-Wright Co., Inc.
Eric C. Baum Assoc., Inc.
Hamblet fie Hayes Co.
The Hine Line
Hooker Chemicals fie Plastics Corp.
Industrial Commodity Corporation
International Advisory Service
Johnson fie Carlson
Korium Associates, Inc.
Norton Co.
Quaker City Hide Co.
Redi-Stac, Inc.
The Roit Corporation
Chas. H. Stehling Co.
Arthur C. Trask Corp.
USM Corp-Turner Tanning
  Machinery Div.
Woburn Machine Co.
Source:  Tanners' Council of America Directory,  "Leather and Suppli-
         ers to the Tanning Industry," July 1975.
                                20

-------
Suppliers of hides and skins are listed in Table 10.  The hides are
usually cured green salted or brined by the supplier unless transit
time is very short.
               TABLE 10.  SUPPLIERS OF HIDES AND SKINS
Andrews Hides, Inc.
M. Aschheim Co., Inc.
G. Bernd Company
Booth Agencies (Boston), Inc.
Harold Braun & Co., Inc.
Harold M. Brodsky, Inc.
Cahen Trading Co., Inc.
George P. Cavanaugh, Inc.
Chilewich Corp.
Herbert A. Cohen Co.,
Denison Hide Co., Inc.
Dietrich Hide Corporation
Eden & Strass, Inc.
H. Elkan & Company, Mass.
H. Elkan & Co., 111.
George H. Elliott Company
Estra Trading Company
Evansville Technical Corp.
Paul Gallagher & Co., Inc.
Fred Gruen Co., Inc.
Hickman & Clark, Inc.
Hide Service, Inc.
J. C. Hodges & Co., Inc.
A. J. Hollander & Co., Inc.
Kaufmann Trading Corp.
The S. J. Kibler & Bros. Co.
M. Lyon & Co.
A. Mindel & Son, Inc.
Muskegon Hide Company
Packerland Packing Co., Inc.
Philadelphia Hide
  Brokerage Corp.
B. N. Ritter & Co.
Rockford Hide Co.
St. Louis Hide Co.
Frank J. Schwab
  Associates, Inc.
Sklut Hide & Fur Co.
Southern Tier Hide & Tallow, Inc.
Southwestern Trading Company
Spencer Foods, Inc.
Swift Fresh Meats Co. - Hide Division
Transcontinental Industrial Co., Inc.
Union Hide Company, Inc.
A. L. Webster Co.
WeCo
Western Hide Co., Inc.
G. A. Wintzer & Son Co.
 Source:   Tanners' Council  of America Directory, "Leather and Suppliers
          to the Tanning  Industry," July  1975.

      Cattlehides constitute the major portion of tanning in the United
 States  and  are estimated to represent 90% of the total.  Sheep and lamb,
 followed  by pigskin,  are the next largest categories, constituting less
 than 10%.  A very small  amount of other  hides tanned include exotic hides
 such as shark, seal,  kangaroo, elk, and  moose.
                                   21

-------
     A flow diagram for the tanning processes is given in Figure 1.
The chemicals used in the processing techniques are outlined in Table  11.
A new process had been proposed (Chem. and Eng. News, 1974) by USDA to
replace the controversial salt curing of the hides.  USDA claims this
process not only reduces pollution but also produces quality leather at
a lower cost.  Cyanides have also been eliminated according to industry
sources, and the use of trichloroethylene is decreasing.  The chemicals
used in tanning listed on the EPA toxic substances list are enclosed in
boxes in Table 11 wherever they can be identified.  In each step of tan-
ning, the potential exists for both water and solid wastes.  Materials
that can appear in tannery wastes are listed below:

               Hair                 Salts
               Hide scraps          Tanning
               Flesh                Soda ash
               Blood                Sugars and starches
               Manure               Oils
               Dirt                 Fats
               Salt                 Grease
               Lime                 Surfactants
               Soluble proteins     Mineral acids
               Sulfides             Dyes
               Amines               Solvents
               Chromium

     Because of the nature of the industry, breakdown of figures for
total sales of tanning materials and dyes cannot be obtained without
revealing information on individual companies.  Estimates of chrome
chemical and dyes usage have been made and are shown in Table 12.  Es-
timates of dye consumption by the leather tanning industry differ greatly
depending on the source.  Dye manufacturers estimate the market at from
3 to 7 x 106 lb dye/yr (1.36 to 3.18 x 1()6 kg/yr); the calculation
based on data from tanning industry representatives indicates use could
be as high as 30 x 106 lb dye/yr (13.6 x 106 kg).  However, it is felt
that an estimate of 7 x 10^ lb (3.18 x 10^ kg) annually is more realistic
based on the number of hides dyed and the average dye loading to the
dyeing operation.

     Pollutant Sources

     The operating parameters (e.g., concentration, temperature) will
vary from tanner to tanner, and since much of the information on formu-
lations is proprietary, the potential loading and composition of waste
streams is difficult to assess.
                                    22

-------
N>
                       BEAMHOUSE
                     RAW MATERIAL
                           Ut
                       RECEIVING,
                       TRIMMING
                      WASHING AND
                        SOAKING
                        FLESHING
                       UNHAIRING
                                                            TANHOUSE
                   *  Nearly all hides received at tanneries
                      are either cured green or brined hides
                   0
                      Solid Waste  .

                      Liquid Waste .
                                                              BATING
 PICKLING
VEGETABLE
 TANNING
CHROME TANNING
                                                                             t?
          VEGETABLE, CHROME,
          OR SYNTHETIC RETAN
                                                                          BLEACHING
                                                                           COLORING
             FATLIQUORING
                                                                                                                           FINISHING
                                                            DRYING, COATING
                                                             AND TRIMMING
                                                                                                                               SA-5619-20
                                               FIGURE 1   FLOW DIAGRAM  FOR  LEATHER  TANNING PROCESS

-------
                                            TABLE  11.  CHEMICALS USED IN LEATHER PROCESSING
N3
•C-    Beamhouse
      Process
                     Soaking
                     Liming  	
                     (Unhairing)
Bating  	—
                     Decreasing	—
 Disinfectants
 Nonionic surfactants   	
 Soda ash (sodium carbonate)
 Sodium polysulfide (tetra)
 Sodium sulfide

 Calcium chloride
 Sharpening agents    	
 Lime
 Proteolytic enzymes

 Nonionic surfactants   	


 Ammonium sulfate
 Ammonium chloride
 Formic acid and salts  	
 Proteolytic enzymes   	
 Nonionic surfactants   	


("sheepskin and pigskin
Idegreased after bating 	
                     Pickling
               paodium chloride
              "(sulfuric acid
                                               . lAlkanol ethoxylate
                                                JAlkylphenyl ethoxylate
                                                Sodium sulfides
                                                Sodium sulfite
                                                Amines     	
                     Sodium hydrosulfide

                     Dimethylamine sulfate
                                                Cyanides {
                                                                     Alkanol ethoxylate
                                                                     Alkylphenyl ethoxylate
Sodium formate
Oropon bates (Rohm & Haas Co.)
Alkanol ethoxylate
Alkylphenyl ethoxylate
                                                Kerosene
                                                Stoddard solvent
                                                Nonionic surfactant	—-
                                                                     Anionic surfactants-
                                                          Alkanol ethoxylate
                                                          Alkylphenyl ethoxylate
                                                          Soaps
                                                          Sulfated oils and alkyl sulfates
                                                          Alkyl benzene sulfonates
                                                                     Triethane (Trichlor-
                                                                       ethylene and perchlor-
                                                                       ethylene)	

-------
                                      TABLE  11    (Continued)
             Chrome
             Tanning
Tanhouse
Process
            |Vegetable_
             Tanning
                             Sodium dichromate
                             Sulfuric acid
                             Glucose or sulfur dioxide
                             Chromium sulfate (basic)   |
                             Borax
                             Nonionic and cationic  surfactants
  [Sodium bichromate]
-!Oxalic acid
 iSodium carbonate
 jSodium hydroxide
 'Potassium hydroxide
 jSodium acetate, diacetate
 jPotassium acetate
 JSodium bicarbonate
                   Barks	—Wattle,  etc.
 [•"                Wood	—Quebracho, etc.
 i Tannins  	"-  Fruits
 '                  Leaves
                   Roots
Alkanol ethoxylate
Alkylphenyl ethoxylate
Cetyl. dimethyl benzyl ammonium chloride
                             Syntans
                                              Condensation  products of
                                                formaldehyde  and:
                                              Nonformaldehyde  condensed
                                                from materials  such as:
                             Anionic
                             Surfactants
                   Soaps
                   Sulfated  oils and alkyl sulfates
                   Alkyl benzene sulfonates
                                                        Naphthalenesulfonic acids
                                                        Phenols and sulfonate phenols
                                                        Diaryl sulfones
                                                       | Urea
                                                       ! Melamine
                                                       j
                                                       jJDicyandiamide

                                                       'Styrenemaleic anhydride
                                                       ' Aryl dilsocyanates
                                                       i Ligninsulfonates

-------
                                                           TABLE 11    (Continued)
                                               Retan -




                                               Color
N>
                        Retan,  color,
                        fatllquor process-
                                              Fatliquor-
                                              Oiling	
                                              Stuffing—
-••-Vegetable  tanning process for chrome tanned hides

    Formic acid
    Syntans	—naphthalene and phenolic synthetic
    All kinds  of surfactants
    Hydrogen peroxide
    Sodium sulfide
    Hydrochloric acid
    •Titanium dioxide
    Ammonium bicarbonate
    Dye  (coal tar)
Acid dyes
Metallized dyes
Mordant dyes
Direct dyes
Developed dyes
                                                             All kinds of surfactants
     Oils.
Neatsfoot
Cod
Sperm
Castor
Coconut
Palm
Wool grease

-------
                                           TABLE 11    (Continued)
               Impregnation-
               Patent
               leathers
Finishing
Process
              I Water or oil
               repellent
Solvents for -
                  Aqueous emulsions  of acrylic  copolymers  - Primal Emulsions  (e.g.)
                  Anionic or nonionic  surfactants

                  Naphtha
                  Boiled linseed oil

                 I Stearato chromic chloride complex
                -Chrome complexes of  perfluro  fatty  acids
                 | Chlorinated hydrocarbons	«-Triethane  (e.g.)
                                                (1,1,1  trichloroethane and  trichloroethylene)
Dyestuffs
Resins
Oils
Lacquers
Varnishes
    J Alcohols
    ; Polyols
——j Glycol - ethers
    ! Esters and ethers
     Ketones
               Nitrocellulose lacquers

               Pigments in water solution containing.
               some hardening protein such as
               shellac or albumin
                                           White   -"titanium dioxide
                                           Black   -  carbon black, bone black, iron oxide
                                           Yellow -  lead chromate, cadmium sulfide-selenides, iron oxide
                                           Orange -  lead chromate
                                           Brown   -  iron oxide
                                           Blue    -  phthalocyanin blue, iron blue, ultra-marine blue
                                           Green   -  phthalocyanin green, chrome green
                                           Red     -  cadmium sulfide-selenide, organic lakes and toners
Note:  Orthodichlorobenzene is recommended for masking odors of decaying  flesh.
       Paradichlorobenzene is used for controlling parasites and mothproofing wool  on  sheepskins.
Source:  SRI International.

-------
               TABIJE 12.  ESTIMATES OF SELECTED CHEMICAL USAGE  AND LOSSES FOR
                                LEATHER TANNING AND FINISHING
Chrome Chemicals (Source:  Dr. Robert Lollar of  the Tanners'  Council of America,  Inc.)
                                          2
     Basis:    One equivalent hide ^40  ft  of leather  (3.72  sq.m).
             ~ 25 x 106 hides to be tanned in 1976
             (~ 22 x 106 hides tanned in  1975)

                 (25 x 106 hides 1 I 50 Ib | _  1.25 x  1Q9  Ib
                      year     f \hide J        year

                                9 ,.\     ,„ „„,*    385 x 106 Ib collagen
 /0.35 Ib collagen^   /1.25 x 1Q9 lb\     (0.88)
 \       Ib       /   \    hide     /

  (0.06 Ib chrome oxide fixed]   ^385 x 10  Ib collagen J
         Ib collagen        /   \          year        /
                                                            year
                                                                   6
                                                            22 x  10   Ib chrome  oxide  fixed
                                                                         year
  23 x 10  Ib chrome oxide/year  _  33 x 10  Ib chrome oxide required    (-10 million  Ib  lost/yr)
   (0.7 of total used is fixed)  ~              year                     (4.55 million kg)

Dyes (Calculated by two different methods)

     A.   Based on estimated dollar value of dye market
          (Source:  Personal communication with representative of dye manufacturers)

          Basis:  Value of dyes sold =• 15 x 10 /year
                  Average price of $3/lb (6.60/kg)
                  Consumption range 5 x 10  Ib/year
                  Estimated sales distribution
                       Acid dyes         $9 million
                       Direct dyes       $3.7 million
                       Basic dyes        $1 million
                       Solvent dyes      $1 million
                       Sulfur dyes       $0.1 million

     B.   Based on production figures for leather and average dye used.
          (Source:  Personal communications with representatives of tanneries)

          Basis:  Percent of dye used ranges from 0.25-27» for most operations.  Industry sources
                  suggest 0.77=, as an average of dye used per pound of hides; approximately 80%
                  of all hides are colored.

          Therefore:

          20 x 106 hides \  /50 Ib \  (0.007)     7 x 1Q6 Ib dye/yr used (3.18 x 106 kg/yr)
          ^—(-(((-—m^ I  I     „,-,  I           ^                                     ^ j
               year      /  \ hide

          Dye loss to sewer may range from 1.1 to 2.8 x 10  Ib/yr for the industry  (0.5  to 1.27 kg/yr).


*  Fraction of leather that is chrome tanned.
Source:  See individual sources listed in table.
                                             28

-------
     Waste streams are identified below as liquid or solid, according to
the unit operation of each process.  Air pollution is limited to odor
problems.
   Beamhouse Process
   Tanhouse Process
   Retan, Color, Fat-
   liquor Process
   Finishing Process
  Unit Operation

Siding and trimming
Washing & soaking
Fleshing
Unhairing
Bating
Pickling
Tanning
Splitting

Retan
Bleaching
Coloring
Fatliquoring

Drying, wet-in
coating tacking,
etc.
                                                 Waste Product
                                                Liquid     Solid
    X
    X
    X
    X

    X
    X
    X
    X
    X
    X
    X

    X
 X
 X
 X
 X
X


X

X
     Waste Streams

     Materials that can appear in tannery wastes include the following:
          Hair
          Hide  scraps
          Pieces  of  flesh
          Blood
          Manure
          Dirt
          Salt
    Lime
    Soluble proteins
    Sulfides
    Amines
    Chromium salts
    Tannin
    Soda ash
Sugars and starches
Oils, fats, and grease
Surface active agents
Mineral acids
Dyes
Solvents
     In the beamhouse process, dirt, salt,  blood, manure and nonfibrous
proteins are removed from the hides.  Depending on  the  time of  the year
and the source of the hides, there is considerable  variation in the
                                   29

-------
quantity of such wastes, and additional rinses may be necessary at sev-
eral points in the beamhouse process, depending on the type of leather
produced.  Fleshings, if properly handled, produce little solid or liquid
wastes.  However, the liming and unhairing steps are principal sources
of waste effluent.  A save-hair operation substantially lowers the waste
effluent.  The tanning process generates substantial wastes.  While re-
cycling of tanning solutions is becoming more common, there is still con-
siderable waste.  Evaporation and recovery is possible, and the waste
solutions can be used in retanning.  Liquid wastes from the retan, color,
and fatliquor process may be high volume-low strength in comparison to the
other processes.  The finishing process generates trimmings as solid wastes,
and dust in either wet or dry form.  The other steps in finishing contrib-
ute only minor amounts to the liquid waste streams.
                                     30

-------
                               SECTION 5

                            LEATHER DYEING
 THE DYEING PROCESS

     Leather dyeing is carried out on chrome or blue hides.  These are
hides that have been through dehairing, washing, soaking, fleshing,
bating, and either a chrome, alum, or vegetable tanning.  Generally, dye-
ing is performed in a batch mode and retan, coloring and fatliquoring
operations are all performed in sequence in the same drum without inter-
mediate steps of washing and drying.

     Hides at the blue stage are placed in drums and retan formulations
are added; at the appropriate time, a designated dye formulation is added
and mixing (by rotation) is continued.  Fatliquoring chemicals are added
at the prescribed time.  Cycle times for this sequence can be as high as
8 hours.

     Three major .types of dyes are used:  acid, basic, and direct.  Acid
dyes are usually azo, triarylmethane, or anthraquinone dyes with acid
substituents such as nitro-, carboxy-, or sulfonic acid.  Basic dyes con-
tain free amino groups.  Direct dyes are principally water-soluble salts
of sulfonic acids of azo dyes.  All the dyes used by the tanning industry
are sufficiently water-soluble and have an affinity for leather; they are
protein-binding dyes.  Both acid and basic dyes at the proper pH values
penetrate deeper into the hide; direct dyes are not penetrating when used
on the blue or vegetable tanned leather.  Acid dyes are fixed more readily
at low pH, but penetrate deeper as the pH increases.  Basic dyes, as the
name implies, are fixed at high pH values.  However, basic dyes have to
be used with a vegetable tanning material or an anionic syntan to dye
chrome leather.  Thus, the uptake of dye in the leather is a function of
the dye used, pH, syntans present, and the float.  High float levels
(ratio of liquor to hides) may be necessary to maintain even coloring.
The end use of the leather also determines how deep the color needs to
be.  For upholstery leather, for example, surface dyeing is suitable be-
cause of the light use.  For shoe or garment leather, deeper penetration
of the dye is required.  Blends of dyes are used in order to obtain the
exact shade desired.
                                    31

-------
     The relationship between pH and uptake of dye is shown in Figure 2.
Thus, in practice, pH adjustments may be made to assure penetration and
fixing of an acid dye, while a basic dye may be added at a later point
in the dyeing process to coprecipitate with the acid dye.

     After the dyeing process, the liquid is drained off, the leather is
pressed, and all the effluent is disposed of at one time.
DATA ACQUISITION

     An extensive literature search was made to collect information on
dyeing of leather, but this resulted in little data.  Therefore, on-site
visits were deemed necessary.  Visits were made to four tanneries, which
were chosen from a list recommended by the National Tanners' Council.
Topics for discussion were as follows:

     ®  Number of formulations used in dyeing.
     o  Colors (range, predominant colors)
     o  Types of dyes
     o  Loading

     e  Float
     e  Dye/lb of leather
     o  Dye lost/lb of leather

     o  Cycle times

     o  Effluent characteristics.

     The results of the survey are given in Table 13.  Suppliers were
also contacted to determine which dyes are used by the leather industry.
From all sources, it is apparent that dye formulations are trade secrets
or handed down in family-owned businesses.  In many cases, suppliers
prepare the formulation to meet a specific color demand for one of the
tannery's clients, and the tannery has no knowledge of the exact nature
of this formulation.  All colors are made up on demand and several dif-
ferent colors may be used in any one day.

     The quantity of dye used depends on the color, the type of leather
(split, or grain, cattle, sheep, or other), and even the mix of dyes.
Mixtures of dyes are often used to obtain a specific color.  The uptake
of dye by the leather also depends on the color desired.  Cycle times
are from 4 to 8 hours and only estimates are available on actual dye
                                   32

-------
          90
          80
          70
          60
          50
          40
          30
          20
          10
                                    DIRECT DYE
                                                      ACID DYE
                     / BASIC DYE
             2468
                                         pH
       SOURCE: Thorstensen, T.C., Practical Leather Technology (R.E. Krieger Publishing Co.,
               Huntington. New York, 1976), p. 178.

                                                                    SA-5619-21

FIGURE 2   THE UPTAKE OF  DYE IN LEATHER AS A FUNCTION OF pH
             The acid dyes fix more at low pH. The reverse is true of the basic  dyes. A
             direct dye has high fixation over a wide pH range.

-------
                                             TABLE 13.  SURVEY OF THE LEATHER INDUSTRY  TANNERY
U>

No. of formulations used
in dyeing
Colors (Range, predominant
colors)

Types of dyes

Loading (typical or aver-
age range)
Float
Dye/kg of leather (wet)

Dye lost/kg of leather


Cycle times

Effluent characteristics


Products

Production (average)

Source of hides




A
300, 50 active (some
spray dyed)
Brown, black, cream
white and otherst

Direct, acid, basic,
metallized


2-3/1
A

Unknown ^estimate
50 to 80% dye uptake

4 to 8 hr

0.4 mgd


Garment & shoe leather

~ 1000 hides/day

90% glove chrome-
tanned, full grain
cattle hide, some
deer, elk, sheep, goat

B
15 (all mill dyes)

Yellow, white,
natural*t

Direct, acid
(50/50)


-4/1
typical 6 kg/900
kg or 0.7%
Unknown, estimate
~90% uptake on av.

4.5 - 5 hr

~1 mgd total to
municipal sewer

Chrome tanned up-
holstery leather
10,000 actual hides/
week
Cattle



Tannery
C
60-65

Mostly browns, black,
but some of all
other colors
Acid, direct,
metallized


1-2/1
0.25 - 5%
,-
Estimate uptake
>95% on lighter
dyes
4-9 hr (av. =
7.5 hr)
No data - directly
to municipal sewer

Garment & shoe
leather
?

Cattle




D
50-70

Mostly browns, black, but some
of all other colors

Acid, direct, metallized



1-2/1
0.25 - 2% '

Estimate > 90% to 95% uptake on
i most colors except chocolate
browns
4 to 8 hrs

20 to 40 BOD except when
t < 20 F; then BOD can go up to
200. under severe winter conditions
Shoe leather mainly

3250 hides/day

Cattle,, beef



     ? = unknown  .
     * ~ 50% of output is not dyed—natural color develops during retan and  fatliquoring.
     t £ 10% of production is dyed a variety of red, green or blue colors.
     * Violets, blues, greens, purples.
     A Tan 0.25 to 0.5%, light brown 0.25 - 0.5%, med.  brown 0.5 - 0.75%, dark brown  1  - 2%.

-------
uptake.  Splits take up more  dye  and  therefore more dye is added to the
batch.  Estimates of uptake range from 60-95%.
TANNERY EFFLUENT  CHARACTERISTICS AND TREATMENT

     No data were  obtained  from the  literature or from individual  tanners
on the content  of  dye  in  the  raw or  treated  wastewater.   The  literature
reports that effluents from tanneries are  colored,  but it has not  been
verified  that this results  solely or in part from dyes.

     Currently, wastewater  from about 90%  of the  tanners, accounting
for approximately  80%  of  tannery industry  production,  is  discharged to
municipal systems.  The estimated flow from  a 1,000 hide/day  cattle hide
tannery  (basis:   60 Ib/salted hide)  based  on an average of 12 tanneries
(from a  study by  Thorstensen  Laboratory) is  1.61  x  10  jfc/day  (~ 58.2 4/kg
of salted hide  or 70.8 £/kg of hide).  A study for  the EPA (1974)  is
based on  several  different  volumes,  of which an average of 1.14 x  10^ I/day
appears  to us to  be the 'best  estimate for  a  1000  hide/day tannery.

     A breakdown  of effluent  loadings from the different  operations
 (Table  14) shows  a variation  of BOD  from 22.7 to  1364  kg/day  and total
suspended solids  of 81.8  to 1773 kg/day.  The total flow  rate may  vary
considerably among tanneries, and the color  of the  effluent will vary from
 light yellow-orange to a  brown color.

     Effluent treatment varies with  the relationship of the tannery and
its community.  A small tannery's discharge  in the  sewer  of a large com-
munity may be hardly noticeable, whereas a large  tannery  in a smaller
community would have a greater impact.   Also,  tanning  operations are not
continuous but  are on  a batch basis.   Thus,  effluent composition is likely
to be quite variable if there is no  equalization  or holding basin.

     The  treatment sof  effluent generally follows  several  steps:  screen-
ing, coagulation,  settling, and in some cases,  an activated sludge oper-
ation.  For the four tanneries visited, little  was  known  of the  exact
chemical  characteristics  of the effluent,  and  efforts  are only recently
being made by EPA contractors to identify  specific  compounds  or  constit-
uents.

     Tanneries  are approaching the water pollution  abatement  problem in
different ways.   On-site  activiated  sludge plants have been installed in
some cases and  are completely owned  and operated  by the tannery.   In other
instances, the  activated  sludge operation  is set-up and controlled by the
tannery only until it  is  operational, after  which it is turned over to
the city.   In most instances, waste  streams  are still  fed directly into
                                     35

-------
                   TABLE 14.  ESTIMATED EFFLUENT STREAM LOAD FROM A 1000 CATTLE HIDE/DAY TANNERY
                                          (60 LB GREEN SALTED CATTLE HIDE)
Processing
Steps
Soaking
Unhairing
Liming
Bating
Chrome tanning
Retan, coloring and
fat liquor ing
Finishing
Flow
189
189
379
227
57
379
189
BOD
(kg /day)
409
1,364
273
22.7
10.9
54.5
81.8
Total
suspended
solids
(kg/day)
682
1,773
409
191
136
81.8
136
Total
solids
(kg/day)
5,864
4,090
1,364
545
4,090
545
218
Oil and
grease
(kg/day)
_.
273
136
545
273
45.5
273
Sulfide Chromium
(kg/day) (kg/day) pH
6.0-8.0
205 — 11.0-12.5
273 — 11.0-12.5
7.0-10.0
136 3.5-4.0
27.3 4.0-5.0
5.0-8.0

Source:  Thorstensen, T. C., "Practical Leather Technology", R.  E.  Krieger Publishing Company, Huntington,
         New York, 1976, p. 263.

-------
the municipal system without prior treatment.   Because the effluent
streams can be highly  colored  even iri the  absence of dye,  the tanneries
have been unable  to estimate the  actual  amount of dye in the stream.

     Based on estimates available of  the dye consumed (see Table  13)  and
a water usage of  1.14  x 106 A/day,  calculations were made  of the  concen-
tration of dye in (1)  effluent streams of  the  entire plant operation  at
high, average, and low water usage, and  (2) the dyeing operation  effluent
stream only.  These are shown  in  Table 15.
DYE REMOVAL  IN WASTEWATER TREATMENT

     Our search of the literature and discussions with selected industry
representatives did not result in useful information on dye removal in
wastewater treatment.  However, some extrapolation of the data is possible,
as described below.

     A past EPA study (Thackston, 1973) reported that ". . . color in
the spent dye wastes was not removed or diminished by biological waste
treatment."  The dyes used at the tannery under study were mostly acid
dyes.  Some dye solution reuse was being practiced during the EPA test
program, but is not being done now.  The current operations include al-
most all alum tanning and the activated sludge plant effluent is a "bour-
bon color" (Caldwell Lace, 1977).  Mostly brown dyes are used at the tan-
nery, although some orange dyes are used from time to time.

     Figure 3 shows hypothetical stream compositions based on some typical
data from the literature and estimates of dye concentrations.  A value
of 2 mg COD/mg dye has been calculated for a widely used dye.  As shown
in Figure 3, the dyes would represent less than 2% of the COD of the raw
wastewater to primary treatment.  It is difficult to predict, however,
how much of the soluble COD is contributed by the dyes or what fraction
of the dye is in solution or sorbed on suspended matter.

     In the previously mentioned EPA tannery study, if it is assumed that
the reported dye use is typical of the industry, the dye would be expected
to contribute from ~ 44 to 112 mg/liter of COD or 11 to 28 mg/liter of
TOC.  Results of COD and TOC measurements of filtered samples of raw
waste influent to the treatment plant, primary effluent, and secondary
effluent are plotted in Figure 4 along with BOD  measurements of un-
filtered samples.  Much of the BOD  was attributed to high suspended
solids levels in all three sampling points.  The data show that soluble
organics removal is quite good and that the soluble COD level and TOC
levels possibly contributed by the dyes are low relative to the raw
                                    37

-------
                TABLE 15.  CONCENTRATION OF DYES IN WASTE STREAMS
Float Ratio and Percent Dye Use

     We can calculate the volume of dye waste streams and dye concentrations as
follows:
     Average water use per hide in dyeing
     (float of 2/1; 50#/hide

     Average dye used per hide
     (0.7% of a 50# hide)

Range of Uptake

     Dye Required
     20 x 106 hides J I 50 Ib
           yr       I \hide

     Upper Limit of Dye Fixed
                           2000 Ib water/
                           100 Ib  hides
                        =  0.35 Ib
  [0.007 | =  7.00  x 10   Ib  dye
                    required/yr
           (Dye required, Ib)
    Uptake  of 75% for 10% of hides
    Uptake  of 85% for 90% of hides


                6
           (7.00 x 10)(0.75)(0.10)= 0.53 x 10

           (7.00 x 106)(0.85)(0.90)= 5.36 x 106 Ib
Range of dye
fixed at upper
   limit
                                  = 5.89 x 10  Ib fixed total

     Lower Limit of Dye Fixed

          (7.00 x 106)  (0.60) = 4.2 x 10  Ib fixed

     Dye Loss Range =  (7.00 x 1Q6 - 5.89 x 1Q6) to (7.00 x 1Q6 - 4,2 x 106)

                    =  1.1 x 10  to 2.8 x 10  Ib dye
 Overall  Industry Wastewater Flow Quantities

      Low Flow       2  gal/lb of hide

      Average Flow   6  gal/lb of hide

      High Flow     20  gal/lb of hide

 Concentration Range Based  on Average Flow
      20 x  10  hides x  50  Ib
         year          hide
       1 x  10   Ib x  6 gal
         vear       Ib
   1.0 x 10 /yr
6 x 10  gal (or 50 x 10  Ib H 0/yr)
   year
                                       38

-------
                           TABLE 15.    (Continued)
                                6
     Low Concentration  1.1 x 10  Ib dye/yr  •  22 ppm
                        50 x 109 Ib H 0/yr

     High Concentration 2.8 x 10  Ib dye/vr  -  56 ppm
                        50 x 10s Ib H 0/yr

Dye Concentration Based on Dyeing Operation Only (Float Average  of 2/1)
                                       6
     Low Concentration   	1.1 x 10  Ib
 50 Ib ^ f 20 x 106 hides ^ ( 2 Ib H20 \  -   560 ppm
 hide
                                \ / 20 x 106 hides \ / 2 Ib H-,0 \
                                ) \      yr       ) ^    yr   )
                                       6
     High Concentration  	2.8 x 10  Ib
                                  /20 x 106 hides \  /2 Ib H2
                                  V      yr       M    yr
/ 50_lb \ / 20 x 106 hides \   (2 Ib H?0 \ =  1400 ppm
I hide
Source:  Development Document for Effluent Limitations Guidelines and New
         Source Performance Standards for the Leather Tanning and Finishing
         Point Source Category, EPA-440/l-74-016a,  March 1974 and SRI Inter-
         national.
                                         39

-------
  WASTEWATER     (^
(DYE AND OTHER  	
CONTAMINANTS)
1 — , — t



•MB

(2)
• — CLARIFIER '
- SOLIDS


— »>TO DISPOSAL

1/1^
06 \
/

AIR >^
RECYCLE
WASTE 1
CELLS ?
SECONDARY TREATMENT
                                                                ACTIVATED SLUDGE
                               ESTIMATED STREAM CONCENTRATIONS
(1)
300,000
,, cc.|<112 mg/l
^-oo l OF COD
1,900
5,200
2,800
86
380
190
(2)

t *
1,140 (40%)*
3,800 (27%) §
1,430 (49%) i
13 (63%) §
140 (85%) §

                                                                                    (3)
                                                                                    NA
 FLOW*, gal/day

 DYE, mg/l

 BOD, mg/l

 COD, mg/l

 SS, mg/l

 TOTAL Cr, mg/l

 GREASE, mg/l

 SULFIDES, mg/l

 "Based on 6 gal/lb of hide

 SOURCE: Development Document for Effluent Limitations Guidelines  and New Source
          Performance Standards for the Leather Tannery and Finishing Point Source
          Category, EPA-440/1-74-016a, March 1974.

 tSince the dyes used in the leather industry are protein-binding and the waste streams have a
 high level of protein (hair, flesh, hide), it is probable that much of the dyes could be removed
 with the solids.

 This is an average of two values from souce in (a)-

^SOURCE:  E. Weisberg, 1975. Development of a Waste Treatment System for a Tannery,
           AlChE Proc. of Workshop, Ind. Proc. Design on Pollution Control 7, 44-48 .
                                                                                          SA-5619-23
         FIGURE 3 .   EFFLUENT TREATMENT  FOR A COMPLETE CHROME  TANNERY
                                                 40

-------
        Tf\2113
  1400 -


  1300


  1200


  1100


  1000


„ 900

-I
Z 800
g
H-
tr

          m
   700
 111
 O

 8
   600
       -     -I-
   500
   400
   300
   200
    100

             SAMPLES
          NOT FILTERED
             (BOD5)
 'Mean .
 tEffluent from activated sludge
                                                                   Raw Wastewater
                                                                   Primary Effluent
                                                                   Secondary Effluent
                                                                     POSSIBLE     _
                                                                       DYE
                                                                       COD
                                                                       -.-, POSSIBLE
                                                                       |||]  DYE ~~
                                                                       ill  TOC
                            SAMPLES FILTERED    SAMPLES FILTERED
                                  (COD)               (TOO
  Possible Dye
  Contribution
to COD and TOC
  in Influent
                                                                           SA-5619-22

FIGURE 4 .  ESTIMATES OF BOD5, COD, AND TOC OF EFFLUENT STREAMS OF TANNERY
                                         41

-------
wastewater; however, if these organics are not removed in treatment, they
could represent a significant portion of the soluble COD or TOG in the
effluent.

     From a review of the literature on biodegradability of dyes included
in Appendix B to this report, it appears that biodegradation of the dyes
is unlikely to be a mechanism for removal.  Because of the high concentra-
tions of other degradable organic compounds, however, it is possible to
maintain a large population of viable microorganisms.  Removal of dyes
by biosorption (perhaps by reaction with proteinaceous cellular material)
may be the major mechanism for removal of the dyes in the activated sludge
unit.  A similar mechanism may be responsible for any removal that occurs
in the primary treatment unit where a portion of the suspended matter is
composed of proteinaceous material (hair and hide scapes).

     A large percentage of the dyes may be removed from the tannery in
combination with waste primary and secondary sludge solids.
                                  42

-------
                               SECTION  6

              TOXICITY AND ENVIRONMENTAL FATE  OF DYES
TOXICITY OF DYES

     Because no data  are  available  on the  actual  extent of removal of
dyes in treatment plants  (industrial  or  combined  municipal/industrial)
from tannery wastewaters,  the  next  logical step in  the analysis is to
consider the toxicity of  the dyes and the  possible  fate of the dyes
in the environment.

Toxicity to Acquatic  Organisms

     In a study sponsored  by the American  Dye Manufacturers Institute,
Inc (ADMI 1974), more than 50  dyes  were  screened  for toxicity to the
single-celled green algae,  Selenastrum capricornutum. and the fathead
minnow (Pimephales promelas).  This is probably the most comprehensive
study yet performed in the United States to assess  the potential haz-
ards of dyes to aquatic life.  We understand that a considerable data
base on the environmental  effects of  dyeis  has been  developed in Japan;
however, we were unable to obtain the data in time  for this report.

     The ADMI study showed that the basic  dyes are  generally more toxic
than the acid  or direct dyes.  Table  16  shows that  of 15 basic dyes
tested, 13 inhibited  the  growth of  £5.  capricornutum by at least 80% at
1 mg/liter in 7 days.  All 5 of the basic  dyes screened with minnows
had 96-hour LC50 concentrations of  less  than 6 mg/liter, as shown in
Table 17.  Basic Green 4  and Basic  Violet  1 had 96-hour LCSOs of less
than 1 mg/liter.

     Some of the acid dyes exhibited  relatively high toxicity to minnows,
Most toxic of all  11  dyes  tested were Acid Blue 113, Acid Green 25,
Acid Black 7, and Acid Yellows 38 and 151.  The 96-hour LCSOs for these
dyes ranged from 4 to 29  mg/liter.

     Of the three kinds of dyes, direct  dyes were the least toxic to
minnows.  Of 14 direct dyes tested, none had a 96-hour LC50 less than
125 mg/liter, and most had LCSOs greater than 180 mg/liter.  Direct
Blacks 38 and 80 inhibited algal growth  by at least 80% at 10 mg/liter.
                                    43

-------
           TABLE  16.  TOXICITY   OF  ACID, BASIC,  AND DIRECT
          DYES  TO THE GREEN  ALGA, SELENASTRUM CAPRICORNUTUM
      Dye
Concentration  producing
at least 50% inhibition
Concentration producing
at least 80% inhibition
Acid Black
Acid Blue
Acid Blue
Acid Green
Basic Blue
Basic Blue
Basic Blue
Basic Violet
Basic Violet
Basic Violet
Basic Brown
Basic Orange
Basic Orange
Basic Red
Basic Red
Basic Yellow
Basic Yellow
Basic Yellow
Basic Green
Direct Blue
Direct Blue
Direct Brown
Direct Black
Direct Black
1
25
113
25
39
9
21
1
6
10
4
2
21
2
18
11
13
37
4
6
218
95
38
80
10
10
10
10
1
1
1
1
1
10
10
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
10
10
10
10
10
>10
>10
>10
10
1
1
1
1
1
>10
10
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
>10
>10
>io
10
10

* Based on biomass.
t In me/lite
:r.


Source:   American Dye Manufacturers Institute,  Inc.  "Dyes  and  the
         Environment", Reports on Selected  Dyes and  Their  Effects,
         Vol 2,  Sept. 1974.
                                44

-------
       TABLE 17.  TOXICITY OF ACID, BASIC, AND
DIRECT DYES TO THE FATHEAD MINNOW, PIMEPHALES PROMELAS



Dye
Acid Orange
Acid Orange
Acid Yellow
Acid Yellow
Acid Yellow
Acid Black
Acid Black
Acid Blue
Acid Blue
Acid Blue
Acid Green
Basic Brown
Basic Green
Basic Violet
Basic Yellow
Basic Blue
Direct Yellow
Direct Yellow
Direct Yellow
Direct Yellow
Direct Yellow
Direct Yellow
Direct Blue
Direct Blue
Direct Blue
Direct Red
Direct Red
Direct Brown
Direct Black
Direct Black


7
24
17
38
151
1
52
25
45
113
25
4
4
1
11
3
4
11
12
28
50
106
6
86
218
23
81
95
38
80
9 6 -Hour LC50
(mg/liter)
165
130
>180
23
29
>180
7
12
>180
4
6.2
5.6
0.12
0.047
3.2
4.0
>180
>180
125
>180
>180
>180
>180
>180
>180
>180
>180
>180
>180
>180

           Source:   American Dye Manufacturers  Institute,
                    Inc.,  "Dyes and  the Environment," Reports
                    on Selected Dyes and Their  Effects, Vol. 2,
                    Sept.  1974.

                            45

-------
     The toxicity of dyes could be related  to chemical structure; how-
ever, preliminary inspection of the structures did not reveal any obvious
relationships.  A more comprehensive evaluation is beyond the scope of
this project.

     Effluent from the leather industry contains, among other substances,
a mixture of dyes.  We estimate that prior to treatment, the effluent
contains about 22 to 56 mg/liter of total dyestuffs.   It is difficult to
determine how toxic this concentration range will be  to aquatic organ-
isms if it remains unchanged after treatment.  The toxicity will depend
on the kinds of dyes in the mixture and the interaction among the dyes
and with other compounds in the effluent.  We would expect the effluent
to be acutely toxic to aquatic organisms if the mixture contained pri-
marily basic dyes.

     Before a meaningful hazard evaluation of the effluent can be made,
information would have to be obtained regarding the interactive effects
of the various dyes in the mixture.   Furthermore, only acute toxicity
data have been generated to date; chronic toxicity data are also needed.

     We found only a limited amount of information on the bioaccumulation
potential of dyes.  We understand that this kind of information has been
developed extensively in Japan.  We do not anticipate high bioaccumulation
potentials for the more polar dyes;  however, since these dyes are used
in the leather industry, and leather is composed primarily of proteins,
some bioaccumulation is expected in aquatic animals.

     The log P (octanol-water partition coefficient values) for some azo
dyes are relatively high, indicating high lipophilicity and therefore a
tendency to bioaccumulate.  For azobenzene, 4-aminoazobenzene, 4-dimethyl-
aminoazobenzene, and 2-methyl-4-[(2-methylphenyl)azo] benzenamide, the
log P values are 3.82, 3.50, 4.58, and 4.24, respectively.  Other non-
polar dyes may have a high bioaccumulation potential  also.

Potential Human Health Effects

     Few toxicological studies with laboratory mammals have been per-
formed on dyes specific to the leather industry; hence, no positive
conclusions can be made concerning the impact of these dyes on human
health.  However, many of the dyes are aromatic amines, a class of com-
pounds comprising a large number of suspected carcinogens.  Other dyes
possess diazo groups, which, if cleaved, could be converted to aromatic
amines.  Still others contain aromatic nitro groups that are character-
istic of compounds with carcinogenic potential.
                                   46

-------
     Dyes that have been  shown to be carcinogenic  in rodents  include
Basic Orange  2 and Direct Blue 14 (IARC,  1975).  Information  reported
in the IARC Monograph  indicates that Direct  Blue 53  may be carcinogenic
and teratogenic.  Studies have been performed  on Acid Red 2 and Acid
Orange 20, but the data are  inadequate  for judging the potential of
these dyes to produce  cancer.
ENVIRONMENTAL FATE

     There are  few data  on which  to base an environmental fate assess-
ment for dyes introduced into waters by the leather industry.  This is
due in part to  the large number of dyes used, which may be complexed by
any of several metal  ion species  either in the dyeing plant or later in
the aquatic environment.  The mixtures of dyes also contain impurities,
which adds to the complexity of the assessment.*  Additionally, the in-
dustry itself has had no facilities for determining the composition of
the effluent streams.  Most of the dyes used in the leather industry
are protein-binding dyes and the  waste streams in a tannery containing
hair, flesh, trimmings,  and other materials are high in protein and
could be expected to  bind many of the dyes and thus remove them from
the stream.  This process, however, would probably depend on the pH and
chemical composition  of  the effluent stream.

Physical Properties

     No physical properties were  available, in part probably because
the impurities in dyes themselves make measurements of data  question-
able.  From the general  structure of various dyes, some of which contain
phenolic, amine, sulfonic acid, and other ionic groups, these dyes
should be moderately  soluble in water; no quantitative information  was
found.

Chemical Transformation

     Hydrolysis

     Dyes contain no common group that is subject  to hydrolytic  reactions.
Some dyes do contain acetylated amine groups on aromatic  rings,  and such
can be hydrolyzed at pH 7 at ~ 20°C with half-lives of a  year or more
   Ecological and Toxicological Association of the Dyestuff Manufactur-
   ing Industry (ETAD), based in Switzerland,  apparently has  data on
   the environmental fate of some dyes which may provide information.
   This information is being sought.

                                    47

-------
(Mabey and Mill, 1978).  Since such reactions are slow, and only affect
a minor part of the dye structure, hydrolysis should not be considered
an important fate.

     Oxidation

     No information on the environmental oxidation of any dye was avail-
able.

     Photolysis

     Porter (1973) has conducted photolyses of dyes in neutral water
solutions.   Most photolyses were performed using a carbon-arc light
source, which partially simulates the wavelengths and distribution of
the solar spectrum.  The photolyses were followed by decreases in ab-
sorbance at wavelengths in the visible region.  The data were plotted
by Porter as (concentration) versus (time); a straight-line plotted in
this manner indicates a zero-order kinetic law behavior.  Most of the
plots were not linear, however, and showed curved lines, a few of which
may be first order if replotted as 4n (concentration) versus (time).
Photolyses were also conducted with the dyes Basic Green 4 and Direct
Blue 76 in sunlight.  The photolysis data for the sunlight and carbon-
arc light experiements are summarized in Table 18.

     Meaningful half-life data cannot be obtained from this data since
no coherent kinetic law behavior was found; this could have been due to
a number of reasons, including the impurity of the dyes themselves with
the compounds present reacting at different rates and possibly also with
each other and/or products.  The analytical method must also be respon-
sible for the failure to get good kinetic plots for some dyes since
only the total absorbance at a wavelength was measured, which included
absorbances of the dye, impurities, and products.  Moreover, since the
leather dye process often uses metal ions other than those used in the
textile processes, some photochemical rates may be different due to dif-
ferent metal ions present; Porter's work used the textile dyes.  Porter
states that the carbon arc light gives photolysis rates that are at
least 10 times faster than those in sunlight.  Using this rough rule of
thumb, and assuming that the photolysis rate varies linearly with light
intensity, the amount of reaction indicated in Table 18 with the car-'
bon arc lamp corresponds to about 6 months of sunlight (at 12 hours of
sunlight per day).  As seen in Table 18, most dyes will be resistant
to photodegradation with half-lives of at least a few months or more.
It appears that the basic dyes are most photodegradable, the acid dyes
are of varying reactivity, and the direct dyes are the least photoreact-
ive.
                                   48

-------
    TABLE  18.   PHOTOLYSIS OF DYES





Basic Dyes
Basic Violet
Basic Blue
Basic Green
Basic Green
Basic Red
Acid Dyes
Acid Red
Acid Violet
Acid Orange
Acid Red
Acid Black
Acid Violet
Acid Blue
Direct Dyes
Direct Red
Direct Green
Direct Black
Direct Blue
Direct Blue
Direct Red
Direct Brown
Direct Blue






3
9
1
4
2

1
3
10
37
52
43
40

80
6
80
76
98
83
95
86
% Reaction
after
200 hr
with
carbon
*
arc lamp
78
58
90*
92f
71

30
92
>95
>95
< 8
50

-------
Physical Transport

     Volatilization

     Volatilization should not be an important fate for dyes since they
should be quite soluble in water and have low vapor pressures.

     Sorption by Particulate Matter and Biota

     Since dyes seem to have long half-lives in relation to other en-
vironmental processes, sorption may be an important fate in spite of
the expected moderate water solubility of the general class of dyes.

     Biodegradation in the Environment

     The amine and phenolic groups in many of the dyes suggest a poten-
tial for facile aerobic biodegradation.  However, our discussions with
Dr. Samuel Boyd of Du Pont and Dr. J. J. Porter of Clemson University
have led us to conclude that biodegradation is not rapid.  One factor
influencing the biodegradation may be metal ions that complex the vari-
ous functional groups.  In any event biodegradation rates are difficult
to predict for any chemical in the aquatic environment since the season
and characteristics of the discharge-receiving water will vary consider-
ably and affect its biodegrading capability.

     The probable fate for dyes introduced into aquatic environments is
to remain in solution in the water system, with sorption onto sediments
and biota eventually occurring.  Chemical processes or volatilization
of dyes do not appear to be important fate processes for most dyes.
Long-term biodegradation in sediment probably does eventually transform
most dyes, but the absence of relevant data prevents quantitative evalu-
ation  of such processes.
                                   50

-------
                              REFERENCES
American Dye Manufacturers Institute, Inc., 1974.  Dyes and the Environ-
     ment, Reports on Selected Dyes and Their Effects, Vol. 2.

Caldwell Lace Leather Co., 1977.  Private Communications.

Environmental Protection Agency, 1974.  Development Document for
     Effluent Limitations Guidelines and New Source Performance Stand-
     ards for the Leather Tanning and Finishing Point Source Category,
     EPA-440/l-74-016a.

Etzel, J. E., and C.P.L. Grady, Jr., 1973.  Effects of Dyes on the
     Anaerobic Digestion of Primary Sewage Sludge.  In:  Dyes and the
     Environment-Report on Selected Dyes and Their Effects, report for
     the American Dye Manufacturers Institute, Vol. 1, Chap. VII.

Fung, D.Y.C., and R.D. Miller, 1973.  Effects of Dyes on Bacterial
     Growth, Appl. Microbiol. 25:793-799.

Hunter, J.V., 1973.  The Effect of Dyes on Aerobic Systems.  In:   Dyes
     and the Environment-Report on Selected Dyes and Their Effects,
     report for the American Dye Manufacturers Institute, Vol. 1,
     Chap. VI.

International Agency for Research on Cancer, 1975.  IARC Monographs  on
     the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risk of Chemicals to Man, Vol. 8,
     Lyon.

Mabey, W., and T. Mill, in press.  J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data

Porter, J. J., 1973.  A Study of the Photodegradation of Commercial
     Dyes, PB-221483.

Porter, J. J., and E. H. Snider, 1976.  Long-Term Biodegradability of
     Textile Chemicals, J.W.P.C.F.  48:2198-2210.

Porter, J. J., and E. H. Snider, 1975.  Thirty-Day Biodegradability  of
     Textile Chemicals and Dyes.  In:  Amer. Assoc. of Textile Chemists
     and Colorists, Tech. Papers of the Nat'l. Tech. Conf., October  15,
     pp. 427-36.
                                   51

-------
Thackston, E. L., 1973.  Secondary Waste Treatment for a Small Diversified
     Tannery.  EPA-R2-73-209.
                                   52

-------
                             APPENDIX A

                 DYES USED IN THE LEATHER INDUSTRY
     Inventory lists from two tanneries showed a variety of dyes in
stock, including several not usually listed by suppliers as being used
in the leather industry.  The major suppliers are Ciba-Geigy, Sandoz,
Crompton & Knowles, Verona, GAF, BASF, American Cyanamid, and American
Color.  Dyes used are acid, basic, direct, and some solvent dyes.
Metallized dyes are also used to obtain a specific product.  Some of
the dyes used are given in Table 19.
                                 53

-------
                                                          TABLE 19.   SOME DYES  USED  IN THE LEATHER INDUSTRY
         C.I. Name
     Acid Black 1
                              CAS No.
3121-74-2 (Free)
1064-48-8 (Na+salt)
                                                               Structural Formula
                                                                                                    Emolral Formula
                                                                                                    C22H14N6°9S2
                                                                                                                                             Remarks
     Acid Black 2
U1
     Acid Black 52
     Acid Blue 9
                         8005-03-6;
                         12227-81-5
5610-64-0(Na salt)
  11 I
Cr'''complex

10279-69-3
2650-18-2
(NH4)2 salt
                                                       >- C
                                                              -        252
                                                                                                    C37H43N4°6S2
                                                                                                                          50420
                                                                                                                          15711
                                                                                                                          42090
                                                                     Sulfonate of compounds
                                                                     formed by heating nitro-
                                                                     benzene, aniline and aniline
                                                                     hydrochloride with Fe or Cu
                                                                     at 180-200°C or using nitro-
                                                                     phenol or nitrocresols in-
                                                                     stead of nitrobenzene
                                                                         11
                                                                     2 Cr   to 3 molecules of
                                                                     the monoozodye
     Acid Blue 83
                         25305-85-5
                         6104-59-2(Na salt)
                                                  NaO
 \2"5                   V°2H5
2-n- {y- e-  (/- N-cHz ~\y C45'

,      ~"  f*^ ~"           ^°5
,H.,N.07S2
                                                                                                42660

-------
                                                          TABLE  19.    (Continued)
          C.I. Same
                             CAS No.
                                                              Structural Formula
                                                                                                   Empirical Formula   C.I. No,
                                                                                                                                          Remarks
      Acid Brown 14
                                                                      OH
                                                NaO S -('   \
                                                                        C26H16N4Na2°8S2    2°195
Ui
Ui
       Acid Brown 354
       Acid Green 35
       Acid Orange 7
573-89-7
(Mono Na  salt,
 633-96-5)
                                                 NaO
                                                                                             S03Na  C30H20N6Na2°12S2  20177
                                                                                                  C16H9N5Na°8S       13361       Cr   complex Is used
C16HllN2NaV      1551°
       Acid Orange 8
18524-46-4;
5850-86-2
                                                 NaO.
C17H13N2NaV      1557S
       Acid Orange  10      1936-15-8
                                                            -N=N-
                                                           NaO 9-
                                                                        C16H10N2Na2°7S2    1623°

-------
                                                     TABLE 19.   (Continued)
    C.I. Name          CAS No.
Acid Orange 24      1320-07-6
                                                        Structural Formula
                                                           OH
                                                       CH,
                                                               OH
                                                                         Empirical Formula    C.I. Ho.

                                                                         C__H, _N,KaO,S       20170
                                                                                                                                   Remarks
Acid Orange 61
Acid Orange 63
Acid Orange 74      10127-27-2
                                                    -N=N
                                                                          Na
                                                  OH
                                           NO,,
                                                          \ /
                                                           c
                                                                         C  H  N NaO.S       19320       CR   conplex is  used
                                                                                                               22870
                                                                                                       SO Na
                                                                         C

                                                                         CH3


                                                                         C16HllV°"6'
S        18745      Cr   complex is used
Acid Red 1
25317-20-8
3734-67-6
                                                          HO  NH • CO • CH.
                                                          /    I         3
                                                                 SO Na
Acid Red 14
13613-55-3
3567-69-9
                                                             OH
                                      NaO,
                                                             k
                                                                                                                14720

-------
                                                          TABLE  19.    (Continued)
C.I. Name CAS No. Structural Formula
OH
1
Acid Red 73 5413-75-2 /==\ /==\— = ^~"\
Na°3S-O
Empirical Formula C.I. No. Remarks
C-.,H, ,N,Na 0 S,, 27290
22 14 4 272
     Acid Red 97
                                                              SO Na           S°3Na
                                                                3  SO.Na
                                                     N-N —
                                                                                             C32H2oVa2°8S2     2289°
Ln
     Acid Red 151
     Acid Violet 3        1681-60-3
                                                                          OH
                                          NaO S-
                                                      - H»N -
                                                             HO   OH

                                                              I    1
                                                      -N-N —
                                                       NaO S
                                                                                                                26900
                                                                                                               16580
     Acid Yellow 1
                                                       ONa
                                          NaO
                                                         -N00
C10H4N2Na2°8S      10316

-------
                                                          TABLE 19.   (Continued)
         C.I. Name
                            CAS No.
                                                            Structural Formula
                                                                                                Empirical Formula   C.I. No.
                                                                                                                                       Remarks
      Acid Yellow 23
                         38-
      Acid Yellow 24
NaojHx   X>_N.N-CN   N
                                         v-
                                                            COONa

                                                    (NH4,Na, or Ca/2)
                                                                                                C10H6N2°5          10315
                                                                                                   ,  orCa/2)
Acid Yellow 36
                         4005-68-9;

                         587-98-4
                                               S03Na
                                                                                          C  H  N NaO S      13065
                                                                                          C'HNNa0S
co
      Acid Yellow 40      6372-96-9
                                                                                 S03H.
                                                       ~S°
                                                                                                                  1895°
      Acid Yellow 42       24382-22-7
                                                                        SO.Na
Acid Yellow 99      10343-58-5
                                                                                                C32H24N8Na2°8S2
                                                                                                C16H13\Na°8S
                                                                                                              2291°
                                                                                                              1390°
                                                                                                                                     used

-------
                                                      TABLE  19.   (Continued)
    C. I.  Name	CAS Ho.
                                                        Structural Formula
                                                                        Empirical Formula    C.I. No.
                                                                                                                                    Remarks
Acid Yellow  151     12715-61-6
Basic Blue 6        7057-57-0
                                        H2N  " °2S
                                                   OH         fa
                                                              C OH
                                                    ,/-N = N - C -CO-HN-     a
                                                   V                    Yk  ff
                                                       0 -
                                                       +
                                                     ^^*fnm~
                                                      -Cl
                                                                        C16H16\°5S
                                                                        C18H13C1N2°
                                                                                                                 51175
Zinc double  chloride
complex
Basic Blue 9        61-73-4
(Methylene blue)
                                                    _+_
                                                     -Cl
                                                                                                                 52015
 Basic Brown 1       1052-38-6
                                                    NH
                                                                  N = N -/
                                                                                            C18H18H8
                                                                                                                 21010
 Basic Brown 4       4482-25-1
                                          H2N-
                                                                              CH
                                                                                            C15H24N8
                                                                                             21010
 Basic Green 4
 (Malachite
  Green)
569-64-2
                                                                                             42000

-------
                                                      TABLE 19.    (Continued)
    C.I.  Name
                       CAS No.
Basic Orange   1     5042-54-6
                   4438-16-8
                                                       Structural Formula

                                                                                            Empirical Formula    C.I. Wo.
                                                         U320
                                                                                                                                   Remarks
Basic Orange  2     493*54-5;
(Chrysoidine)       532-82-1
                                                     NH,
         Cl
                                                         11270
Basic Violet  1     8004-87-3
(Methyl violet)
                                                                                                                 42535
Basic Violet  3     548-62-9
(Crystal violet)
            2

            N  (CH3)2 I Cl
                                      C25H30C1N3
Basic Violet 10     81-88-9
0 -f
C
I
                                                                            Cl
                                                                                                                 4517°
Basic Violet 11     2390-63-8
                                        (H5C2)2N~
- 0
  c
                                                                             Cl
                                    C30H35CIN203         45175

-------
                                                        TABLE 19.    (Continued)
    C.I. Na
                       CAS No.
Basic Yellow 2       2465-27-2
                                                        Structural Formula
                                           HC1 • HN - C

                                         Empirical Formula    C.I.
                                         C17H22CW3
                                                                                                                                     Remarks
Basic Yellow 37     6358-36-7
                                                                                                                 41001
                                           HC1 •  HN • C
NH_
NHn
Direct Black 38     1937-37-7
Direct Blue  1      2610-05-1
 Direct Red   23      3441-14-3
 Direct Red 81       2610-11-9
 Direct Yellow 12    2870-32-8
                                         H2N-(V   />H»-N-<
                                                                        NaO.
                                                                                             C34H25N91'a207S2
                                        ,N-1
                                                                                                                 30235
                                       <3»*
                                                    NH
                                            NaO S -
                                                                               OCH3       OH  NH2
                                                                                 N - N
                                                     SO.Na
   •N
 Na03Sx'
                                                            OH
                                                                                                   S03Na
                                                                    -NH-COHBI -
                                                                        OH
                                                             C33H22N68a4°15S4
                                                             24410
                                                                                                                 29160
                                        NaO.
                                                                                  HH-OC-
                                                     )- N
                                                         NaO.S
                                          C2H5

                                         C30H26N4Ha2°8S2
                                                                                                                 28160
                                                                                                                 2ft895

-------
                               Appendix B'

         BIODEGRADATION OF DYES IN BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT SYSTEMS
     Very little information on biodegradation is available; hence, this
appendix is primarily a discussion of the potential for dyes to biodegrade
in biological treatment systems.

     Most of the dyes used in the leather industry contain sulfonic acid,
sulfonamide, phenolic, and azo and/or nitro functions.  Their colors are
attributed to the characteristics of the conjugated unsaturated struc-
tures, and the dyeing characteristics are attributed to the binding ca-
pacities of these compounds to the protein in the leather, particularly
with the sulfonic acid functions.  Proprietary mixtures are frequently
used to obtain the desired colors.  The preparation of these dyes fre-
quently requires the use of chemicals that are considered toxic and some
of the dyes must themselves be regarded as potential toxic substances.
All living cells contain proteins in their wall membranes, and if stain-
ing takes place, it indicates combination of the pigmented product with
the protein.  This may interfere with the physiological processes of the
cell.  Fortunately, not all products used in coloring are toxic and some
are actually essential for physiological functions; such products include
riboflavin, vitamin A and the carotenoids, the cytochromes, the heme pig-
ments, chlorophyll, vitamin B   analogues, and many other compounds.
Other dyes are useful indicators of oxidation-reduction or pH and are not
in themselves toxic.  Sulfonates such as di-sodium-phenol-tetrabromophthalein
disulfonate (Bromsulfalein) have been used in protein analysis because,
under acid conditions, they readily precipitate proteins.

     There are biological counterparts to the above chemicals that contain
enzymes that can reduce such chromophoric structures as azo, quinone,  and
nitro compounds; however, these enzymatic reactions are highly specific
to the structures of susceptible substrates.  If novel substrates are ex-
amined for biodegradability or persistence, by aerobic or anaerobic proc-
esses, periods of acclimation of a large microbial population are required.
These are complex processes that are not adequately understood, but with
some relatively simple compounds co-metabolism or diauvic growth phenomena
have been observed.  Even under seemingly oxidative conditions, reductive
processes such as the transformations of R-NO_ to R-NH  or R'ci to R'H
can take place.   These reductions occur because of the availability of
reduced coenzymes from other oxidative processes.  If the dyes used
                                     62

-------
in the leather tanning industry  are  decomposed,  the nitro  and  azo  functions
are reduced to finally yield  amino compounds.  These amino compounds  are
then deaminated to  form ammonium ions  and  the  nitrogen  is  finally  oxidized
to nitrate.  Aromatic nuclei  are oxidized  to catechols  and the ring struc-
tures are subsequently ruptured  to yield products  that  are generally  more
readily metabolized.

     It is also possible  that residual dyes  in the wastewaters from dyeing
processes may stain or combine to some extent  with the  organisms in an ac-
tivated sludge plant, trickle filter plant,  or anaerobic digesters, at con-
centrations that do not seriously affect waste treatment organisms, and by
this means dyes can be removed from  the plant  effluents.

     Fung and Miller  (1973)  studied  the effects  of 42 dyes on  the growth
of 30 bacteria in solid media, and it  is apparent  that  the gram-negative
bacteria they used  were more  resistant that  the  gram-positive  bacteria.
Biodegradation studies conducted in  other  laboratories  and in  SRI labora-
tories have resulted  in the development of enrichment cultures  that con-
tain mostly gram-negative bacteria,  but gram-positive bacteria  and fungi
have also been found  to be excellent degraders or  transformers  of some
compounds.  One of  the problems  the  tanneries  have to cope with is the
sporadic use of some  dyes, and if extensive  acclimation periods are nec-
essary to develop biodegrading flora to degrade  the  dyes,  the  degrading
organisms are lost  by microbial  interaction  and  a  fresh charge  of a dye
may not be decomposed.  If the dye concentration is  initia/lly  too high to
facilitate the development of the necessary  flora,  the  dye might even des-
troy some of the existing organisms.   If too much  readily  metabolizable
material (e.g., proteins, particles, fats  and  oils)  is  present  in the in-
fluent to the treatment plant after  the customary  pretreatments, the resi-
dence time of the dye in  the  treatment plant may not be sufficiently  long
if a diauxic phenomenon exists,  or the dye may be  recalcitrant  by custom-
ary parameters.

     The shortcomings of  the  5-day BOD test  are  clearly discussed in pub-
lications by Porter and Snider (1975,  1976).   However,  other factors may
be involved because of the presence  of fats, oils,  surfactants, proteins
and peptides that are present in larger amounts  and  are more rapidly me-
tabolized than the  dyes.

     J. V. Hunter  (1973)  studied the effect  of dyes  on  aerobic  waste  treatr
ment systems and concluded that  17 out of  46 dyes  inhibited action of ac-
tivated sludge in aerobic processes  conducted  in Warburg flasks with ac-
tivated sludge, river water organic  matter,  and  the  dyes.   This report
did not imply that  the processes had ceased, but it  indicated  that some
activity continued  at a reduced  rate.   Small samples and relatively high
levels of dyes (25  mg/liter)  were used in  this work.  With some dyes,

                                    63

-------
inhibition of digestion was observed only with sewage-dye-activated-
sludge.  In the same publication, Etzel and Grady (1973) reported that two
anthraquinone dyes had strong enough activity to cause failures in labora-
tory scale anaerobic digesters.  The concentration of dye added was 150 mg/
liter  .  The dispersing agent Tamo-SN also had a similar acute effect.
Other dyes showed some effects, but these were not sufficiently serious
to cause disruption of the anaerobic processes.  Decolorization was ob-
served with all but two dyes.

     In an EPA report on leather tanning and finishing and numerous other
publications, reference is made to the use of activated carbon to remove
residual dyes and the problems of the application of such adsorption
processes to tannery-plant effluents containing other products that inter-
fere with color removal.  If tannery effluents with dye are highly diluted
with municipal wastewaters, it is possible that they are eliminated by
adsorption on activated sludge and may escape attention because of this
high dilution.

     The current literature reviewed in this brief survey is too indefinite
to form a basis for a conclusion on the best procedures to handle dyes
present in tannery wastes.  Longer biological treatment periods, or re-
cycling trickling filter units for specific dyes may improve some of the
current biological treatment facilities.  It may also be necessary to
treat effluents more extensively or to change some processes or chemicals
before activated carbon can be economically and efficiently used.  A more
extensive literature and field analysis is necessary and experimental
verification of control technology will undoubtedly be required.
                                   64

-------
                                  TECHNICAL REPORT DATA
                           (Please read Instructions on the reverse before completing)
 REPORT NO.
 EPA-600/2-78-215
                            2.
                                                          3. RECIPIENT'S ACCESSION-NO.
 TITLE AND SUBTITLE
    Assessment of Potential Toxic Releases From Leather
    Industry Dyeing Operations
                                                          5. REPORT DATE
                                                              October 1978  issuing  date
                                                          6. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE
 AUTHOR(S)
    S.B. Radding, I.E. Jones, W.R.  Matey, D. H. Liu,
    N. Bohonos
                                                          8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NO.
 PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS
    SRI International
    333 Ravenswood Avenue
    Menlo Park, CA 9U025
                                                           10. PROGRAM ELEMENT NO.
                                                            1BB610
                                                          11. CONTRACT/GRANT NO.

                                                            R 80^6^2-01-2
2. SPONSORING AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS
  Industrial Environmental Research Lab.
  Office of Research and Development
  U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
  Cincinnati, Ohio 45268
                                           - Cinn,  OH
                                                           13. TYPE OF REPORT AND PERIOD COVERED
                                                             Final Report 6/77 - V78
                                                           14. SPONSORING AGENCY CODE
                                                                EPA/600/12
15. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES
16. ABSTRACT
           This study focused on the organic dyes Released to the  environment in
    the wastewaters from leather dyeing operations.  Basically, three types of
    dyes—acid, basic, and direct—are used, although the number  of different
    dyes are well over 50, and  the number of formulations used at a single
    tannery over the period of  several years can be greater than  100.  Tannery
    wastewaters are complex mixtures which for the most part are  discharged
    directly into municipal sewers.  The character of this discharge will
    differ hourly depending on  the operation performed since tanning operations
    are batch mode.  Estimates  based on information from suppliers and tanners
    were made of the probable discharge of dyes in wastewater.  The literature
    search revealed little or no data on the fate of these dyes in the environ-
    ment.   From consideration of the physical and chemical properties of the
    dyes,  biosorption (complexing with proteinaceous material) appears to be
    the most likely mechanism for removal of dyes in biological wastewater
    treatment systems.

           This report covers the period 1 June 1977 to 28 April 1978 and was
    completed as of 28 April 1978.
17.
                                KEY WORDS AND DOCUMENT ANALYSIS
                  DESCRIPTORS
                                              b.lDENTIFIERS/OPEN ENDED TERMS
                                                                           COS AT I Field/Group
    Industrial  Wastes, Wastewater,
    Toxicity, Organic Compounds,
    Dyeing
                                                 Leather Tanning
13B
18. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT

      Release to  Public
                                              19. SECURITY CLASS (ThisReport)
                                                Unclassified
   73
                                              20. SECURITY CLASS (Thispage)

                                                Unclassified
                                                                        22. PRICE
EPA Form 2220-1 (9-73)
                                                     U. S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1978-657-060/1512 Region No. 5-11

-------