EPA-650/1-73-004
May 1973
Environmental Health Effects Research Series
-------
EPA-650/1-73-004
'NORMAL' CARBOXYHEMOGLOBIN LEVELS
OF BLOOD DONORS
THE UNITED STATES
by
Richard D. Stewart, M.D.. M.P.H., Edward D. Baretta, M.S.,
Leigh R. Platte, M.T.. A.S.C.P., Elizabeth B. Stewart, M.T., A.S.C.P.,
Hugh C. Dodd, B.S., Karen K. Donohoo, B.S.,
Sally A. Graff, B.S., John H. Kalbfleisch, Ph.D.,
Carl L. Hake, Ph.D., Barbara Van Yserloo, B.S.,
Alfred A. Rimm, Ph.D., and Paul E. Newton, M.S.
Department of Environmental Medicine
The Medical College'of Wisconsin
Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53226
Contract No. 68-02-0080
Project No. CAPM-8-68
Program Element No. 1AA005
EPA Project Officer: John H . Knelson
Human Studies Laboratory
National Environmental Research Center
Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711
Prepared for
Coordinating Research Council, Inc.
30 Rockefeller Plaza
New York, New York 10020
r
and
OFFICE OF RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460
May 1973
-------
This report has been reviewed by the Environmental Protection Agency and
approved for publication. Approval does not signify that the contents
necessarily reflect the views and policies of the Agency, nor does
mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement
or recommendation for use.
ii
-------
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The Department of Environmental Medicine gratefully acknowledges
the splendid cooperation of Tibor .1. Greenwalt, M. D. , Medical Director of
the Blood Program, the American National Red Cross, without whose coop-.
eration this project could not have been conducted. We also wish to thank the
individual medical directors and the staffs of each of the regional blood
centers who participated in this study. The authors gratefully acknowledge
the secretarial efforts of Mrs. Joyce Aasen, Mrs. Pamela Staab, and Miss
Rita Hanson in preparing this manuscript for publication.
iii
-------
SYNOPSIS-ABSTRACT
A national survey was conducted in 1969-1972 for the purpose of
determining the range of carboxyhemoglobin (COHb) in various segments of
the American population. Venous blood samples were obtained from 29>000
adults at arbitrarily chosen blood bank collection sites in the following geo-
graphical areas: Anchorage, Chicago, Denver, Detroit, Honolulu, Houston,
Los Angeles, Miami, Milwaukee, New Orleans, New York City, Phoenix,
j . •
St. Louis, Salt Lake City, San Francisco, Seattle, Washington, D. C. and
small cities in Vermont and New Hampshire. These blood samples were then
analyzed for COHb content. From every tenth participant, an alveolar breath
sample was obtained for CO analysis' and correlation with the COHb. At the
time of blood collection, detailed questionnaires were completed so that the
influence of the following variables could be assessed: age, weight, height,
sex, race, health status, smoking habits, place of residence, occupation,
place of work, meteorological conditions, background CO concentration at
sampling site, and location and time of sampling. For comparative pur-
poses, COHb measurements were also made on samples from 1, 525 blood
donors in 13 smaller communities in Vermont and New Hampshire, and on
samples obtained from volunteers: breathing CO-free air and air with known
concentrations of CO.
There was excellent agreement between the two independent analytical
methods used to analyze COHb. The mean COHb saturation of 0. 45% of the
adults breathing CO-free air demonstrated the sensitivity of the analytical
iv
-------
methods in detecting low concentrations of COHb. The experimental expo-
sures to fluctuating and discontinuous concentrations of CO demonstrated the
accuracy of the analytical methods to measure COHb over the range of satu-
rations most frequently encountered in the study.
Forty-five percent of all the non-smoking blood donors tested had
COHb saturations > 1. 5% and indicated that exposure to CO in excess of that
permitted by the Air Quality Standards is widespread and occurring regularly.
Tobacco smoking was the single most important factor responsible for the
highest COHb saturations observed. The other chief factors influencing the
COHb saturation were the geographical location of the individual, his occu-
pation, and the existing meteorological conditions. None of the large urban
communities had CO concentrations low enough to comply with the EPA
ambient Air Quality Standards for CO.
-------
CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION 1
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURE 3
RESULTS 6
COMMENTS 21
REFERENCES 26
APPENDIX A - MEDIAN COHb AND 90% COHb RANGE FOR NON-SMOKERS AND
CIGARETTE SMOKERS AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS A-l
APPENDIX B - CARBOXYHEMOGLOBIN FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION B-l
APPENDIX C - INFLUENCE OF RACE AND SMOKING ON COHb . C-l
APPENDIX D - WEIGHT (Pounds) D-l
APPENDIX E - HEIGHT (Inches) E-l
APPENDIX F - INFLUENCE OF RACE AND SEX ON COHb F-l
APPENDIX G - BAROMETRIC PRESSURE G-l
APPENDIX H - TIME OF BLOOD SAMPLE (Hour) H-l
APPENDIX I - HEMOGLOBIN CONCENTRATION, GMI 1-1
APPENDIX J - RELATIONSHIP OF HEMOGLOBIN TO COHb J-l
APPENDIX K - RELATIONSHIP OF CARBOXYHEMOGLOBIN TO SMOKING CATEGORY . . K-l
APPENDIX L - COHb: AGE, SEX, AND RACE FOR NONSMOKERS . L-l
APPENDIX M - RELATIONSHIP OF TOBACCO USE TO COHb M-l
APPENDIX N - INFLUENCE OF OCCUPATION ON COHb N-l
APPENDIX 0 - INFLUENCE OF WIND SPEED, SEX, AND RACE ON COHb 0-1
APPENDIX P - INFLUENCE OF OCCUPATION (NONSMOKERS), WIND SPEED,
AND LOCATION ON COHb P-l
-------
"NORMAL" CARBOXYHEMOGLOBIN LEVELS OF BLOOD
DONORS IN THE UNITED STATES
INTRODUCTION
Carbon monoxide (CO) is one of the major air pollutants which has the
potential for adversely affecting human health. To protect the public, the
Clean Air Act's Quality Standards of 1971 limit CO exposure, permitting a
maximum 8-hour exposure of 10 mg/m , not to be exceeded more than once
per year; or a 1-hour exposure of 40 mg/m , not .to be exceeded more than
once per year. Compliance with the 8-hour standard would prevent excur-
sion of blood carboscyhemoglobin (COHb) above 1. 5% saturation in active non-
smokers.
Assuming that the Air Quality Standard for CO is scientifically valid,
and that exposure to CO concentrations-in excess of the standard could be
detrimental to human health, the immediate questions asked are, "Does over-
exposure to-GO occur in any segment of our population?" and "Are the major
metropolitan areas in the United States currently able to comply with the CO
standards?"
The major difficulty in answering these questions is posed by the
horrendous task of adequately analyzing the CO in the breathing zones of
the masses of people placed under surveillance by the Air Quality Standards.
The expense of air monitoring stations so limits their deployment that no
-------
city in the United States has the capability to'accurately measure the concen-
tration of CO that each of its inhabitants breathes. For example, a Los
Angeles monitoring station located 40 feet above an expressway cannot mea-
sure the concentration of CO eight blocks away in the breathing zone of a
policeman directing traffic at a busy intersection, nor that of a clerk on the
twentieth floor of an office building adjacent to the intersection. Therefore,
the magnitude of CO exposure which various segments of the population
experience is not known with any precision and has only been estimated.
Most of the inspired CO is absorbed through the lungs and bound to
the hemoglobin of the red blood cells. It then circulates in the blood as
COHb. The measurement of the concentration of COHb at any point in time
has been shown to be an accurate measurement of the CO exposure occurring
in the previous 15-hour interval, providing a more accurate means for
estimating the magnitude of recent CO exposure than currently is possible
with the limited number of air monitoring stations ' '
This investigation was undertaken to more adequately answer the
questions regarding the magnitude of CO exposure in the major cities of the
United States and determine the range of COHb for various segments of the
population. Venous blood samples were obtained from 29, 000 adults at
arbitrarily chosen blood bank collection sites clustered in or adjacent to
seventeen large cities. These blood samples were then analyzed for COHb
-------
content and the magnitude of CO exposure estimated. For comparative
purposes, COHb measurements were also made on samples from 1,525
blood donors in 13 smaller communities in Vermont and New Hampshire,
and on samples obtained from four adults voluntarily breathing CO-free air.
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURE
Two research associates were trained in interviewing techniques
and from April, 1969, through June, 1972, journeyed across the United
States collecting blood samples from adults at arbitrarily chosen blood
bank collection sites. At the time of blood collection, detailed question-
naires were completed so that the influence of the following variables could
be assessed: age,, weight, height, sex, race, health status, smoking
habits, place of residence, occupation, and place of work. The following
data were also recorded: (1) location and time of sampling; (2) meteoro-
logical conditions; (3) background CO concentration at sampling site. From
every tenth adult, an alveolar breath sample was obtained for CO analysis
^-•» ^
which served as an independent check on the stability of the COHb until
i • <4'5>
time of analysis.
The venous blood samples were collected in 5-ml Vacutainer tubes
containing EDTA as the anticoagulant and alveolar breath samples were
.collected in 35-ml glass pipettes. ' The samples were then air mailed
to the Department of Environmental Medicine laboratory, Milwaukee,
Wisconsin, for analysis. Blood samples were analyzed by the automated
-------
differential spectrophotometric procedure (CO-Oximeter) based on the method
(6 7}
of Malenfant ' and by a gag chromatographic procedure based on the
method of Collison* . Breath samples were analyzed by gas chromatography
(GC) by the method of Porter and Volrnan ^.
Two carboxyhemoglobin calibration standards, < 1% and> 4%, were
used each morning and periodically throughout the analytical day to recheck
the calibration of the two CO-Oximeters employed '. These COHb standards
were prepared from a unit of fresh whole blood obtained from a non-smoker
and another unit from a heavy smoker. The blood was anticoagulated with
either EDTA or citrate. The red blood cells were washed twice with physio-
logic saline and then hemolyzed with distilled water sufficient to produce a
hemoglobin concentration of 12 to 16gm%. The resulting solution was then
filtered to remove cell membrane fragments and blood clots. Sodium
hydrosulfite (Na^S^O^) sufficient to reduce the oxyhemoglobin to less than
5% was added. The COHb solution was placed in a 2-dram sample vials and
frozen until use. The stability of the stored standards was checked peri-
odically by the GC analytical method described later. Frozen COHb standards
were stable for several months and for 30 minutes after thawing.
To determine COHb by gas chromatography ' , 0. 1 ml of anti-
coagulated whole blood was pipetted into a 35-ml glass reactor vial containing
0. 2 ml of distilled water and 0. 3 ml of concentrated sulfuric acid in separate
compartments. After the reactor was sealed, the three constituents were
allowed to react, releasing CO from its hemoglobin-bound state. After 10
-------
minutes the gas was sampled and analyzed by the GC method of Porter and
Volman^ .
To determine the stability of the COHb moiety in venous blood collected
in 5-ml Vacutainer tubes containing EDTA, samples were stored at 72° F and
at 40° F. Tubes from each group were sequentially analyzed to determine
COHb stability.
Each blood sample for COHb determination was analyzed on a properly
calibrated CO-Oximeter. In addition, each tenth sample was analyzed on a
second CO-Oximeter. If the results of the two analyses varied by more than
0. 2% saturation, the instruments' calibration was rechecked and the difficulty
corrected. The final ten blood samples analyzed each day were stored at
40° F and analyzed the next day as an additional calibration check.
To check on the ability of the two COHb analytical methods to accu-
rately measure low concentrations of COHb, four adults, three males and
one female, breathed 100% oxygen delivered through a Scott Aviation Demand
Oxygen face .mask for a period of three and one-half hours following •which
they breathed air for 90 minutes which had been passed through Hopcalite
to remove CO. Venous blood samples were obtained every 30 minutes for
COHb analysis by the two methods listed above.
To check on the ability of the two COHb analytical methods to accurately
measure the predicted COHb saturation of subjects exposed to fluctuating CO
concentrations, 7 volunteers were exposed for 4 hours to carefully controlled
fluctuating concentrations of CO in the controlled-environment chamber .
-------
To determine the precision with which the breath samples were col-
t -
lected, duplicate samples were obtained from every twentieth subject in
Los Angeles.
In the analysis of the data, the median and 90 percent range were used
to describe the distribution of COHb saturation in the various geographical
locations. Mean COHb saturation was used to investigate the effect of the
other variables such as smoking, occupation, etc. The statistical methods
used to assess the observed differences between mean COHb saturations were
the t-test and analysis of variance for two or more means. Multiple regression
techniques were used to investigate-the influence of meteorological variables on
mean COHb saturation. In all cases, a significance level of P _. 01 was used
to declare statistical significance.
RESULTS
The mean COHb saturation of the four adults prior to breathing 100%
oxygen was 0. 65% with a range of 0. 55 to 0. 75%. After two hours of inhaling
100% oxygen, the mean COHb was 0. 36%. Then after 3. 5 hours of oxygen
inhalation, the mean COHb was 0. 38%, with a range of 0. 30 to 0. 40%. After
breathing CO-free air for 90 minutes, the mean COHb saturation was 0.45%,
with a range of 0. 35 to 0. 5%. This COHb saturation is in agreement with that
reported due to endogenous CO production , and demonstrated the sensi-
tivity of the analytical procedures in detecting low concentrations of COHb.
-------
The seven adults exposed to fluctuating concentrations of CO over a
period of 4 hours attained the anticipated COHb saturation predicted by the
Coburn-Forster-Kane equation for CO uptake ' '. The predicted and
actual COHb values are presented in Figure 1. This experiment demonstrated
the accuracy of the COHb analytical methods to measure COHb over the range
of saturations most frequently encountered in this study.
The studies to determine the stability of the COHb moiety in blood
stored at 40 °F and 72 °F revealed no signs of deterioration for periods up to
six weeks in the refrigerated samples and stable COHb in blood samples un-
refrigerated for two weeks
Employing the quality control procedure described, the CO-Oximeter
yielded excellent COHb analytical results. For example, nine repeat-sam-
pling tests performed on the same instrument on the same refrigerated blood
sample over a period of 16 days gave a. mean COHb of 1. 2%, with a standard
error of 0. 13%, and a range of 1. 0 to 1. 4%.
The^analytical agreement between two CO-Oximeters was good with
an average absolute difference of 0. 20% COHb. Since the analytical precision
of the CO-Oximeter was 0. 2% COHb, the differences in analytical results
between instruments was attributed to instrument precision and not to cali-
bration procedures.
The agreement between the alveolar breath CO and the matched blood
COHb collected in the field did not approach the accuracy of the relationship
previously obtained experimentally , however, the agreement was good
-------
o 7.0.
o
tn
o>
o
6.0.
5.O.
4.O.
3.O.
X
o
•e 2.oj
o
o
c
O)
o
k.
0>
Q.
Predicted by CFK equation
(Average of 7 subjects)
V
T^Actuol values
(Average of 7 subjects)
0>
-2OO o
ISO c
.1000
[50
O a
O 3O 6O 9O I2O ISO I8O 2IO 24O 27O
Exposure duration, minutes
Figure 1: Actual COHb saturation of 7 subjects exposed to fluctuating CO
concentrations in the controlled-environment chamber corn-
pared with the theoretical COHb values calculated by using the
CFK equation
(13)
8
-------
34.
32.
30.
^28
fas]
g24
22
20.
I l8
6 16
g 14
« 12
5-10
I 8
§:
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34
% COHb (by CO-OXIMETER)
Figure 2: The good agreement between the two analytical methods for COHb
determination is apparent in this figure. Carboxyhemoglobin
mean and range values obtained from six determinations by each
method on eight different blood samples are plotted.
-------
no
12.0
11.0
10.0
e 8.0
•§ 7.0
8 6.0
O
o
« 4.0.
o
o
20.
I.O.
1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 11.0 I2O
% COHb (by CO-OXIMETER)
Figure 3: Seventy-eight blood samples collected in the field from both
smokers and non-smokers in the Los Angeles area were analyzed
by the two COHb methods. There was no significant difference
(P < . 001) between the analytical results on blood samples con-
taining less than 3% COHb. Carboxyhemoglobin saturations
greater than 3% showed a poorer correlation and a statistical
paired "t" test showed significance at the 5% level.
10
-------
enough to validate the stability of the COHb moiety until time of analysis. A
major factor influencing the poorer results in the field was the variance in
the CO concentration between duplicate breath samples. The average differ-
ence in CO concentrations between duplicate breath samples was 0. 56 ppm.
Since the accuracy of the GC method was 0. 3 ppm , this indicated that
there was a significant difference between the two samples. Whether this
difference was due in part to analytical variation or to problems with the
breath pipettes due to improper filling, leakage, etc. , cannot be determined
from these data.
The dates on which blood samples were collected at each sampling
site are listed below:
Anchorage: 1971: Aug. 10-13, 16-20, 23-25, 27,
30-31;
Sept. 1-2;
Oct. 13, 16-18
Chicago: 1970; Nov. 4-6, 9-14, 16-19
Denver: 1971: April 20-23, 26-30;
May 3-6, 9-14, 17-20, 25
Detroit: 1970: Nov. 18, 20, 23-25, 30;
Dec. 1-4
1971: Sept. 28-30;
Oct. 1, 4-8
Honolulu: 1971: June 1-4, 7-10, 14-19, 21-24,
27
Houston: 1972: April 4-7, 10-14, 17-20
11
-------
Los Angeles:
Miami:
Milwaukee:
New Orleans:
New York City:
Phoenix:
St. Louis:
Salt Lake City:
San Francisco:.
Seattle:
Vermont-New Hampshire:
Washington, D. C.
1972: Jan. 26-28, 31;
Feb. 1-4, 7-11, 14-18, 21-25;
May 31;
June 1-2, 5-9, 12-16, 19-23,
26-28
1971: Jan. 25-26, 28-31;
Feb. 1-5, 9-13
1972: Jan. 11-14, 17-21
1969: April 1 - Dec. 31
1970: Jan. 1 - Dec. 31
1971: April 1-2
1971: Feb. 19-20, 22-27;
Mar. 1-6, 8
1970: Dec. 7, 9-11, 14, 18, 20-21;
1971: Oct. 11-15, 18-22, 25-29;
Nov. 1-5;
Dec. 3, 6-10, 12-16, 20-21
1972; Mar. 21-14, 27-30
1971: Mar. 10-13, 15-16, 18-19,
21-23
1972: Feb. 19;
Mar. 1-3, 6-10, 13-16
1971: June 29-30;
July 1-2, 6-9, 12-14
1971: July 19-23, 26-30;
Aug. 2-5
1971: Nov. 8-12, 15-19, 22-26,
29-30
1971: Jan. 4-8, 11-14, 18-21
12
-------
The median COHb saturations found in the blood donors and the range
in which 90% of them fell are listed for each of the 18 locations in Table 1.
It was immediately apparent that tobacco smoking was associated with a COHb
saturation an order of magnitude greater than was present in non-smokers.
The percentage of non-smoking blood donors at each of the 18 sam-
pling sites who had COHb saturations in excess of 1. 5% is listed in Table 2.
Of these 15,962 persons, 7, 194 or 45% had COHb saturations greater than
1. 5%. Denver and Los Angeles had the highest percentage of persons above
the 1. 5% cut-off — 76%. The smaller towns in Vermont and New Hampshire
had the lowest percentage — 18%.
The relationship of COHb saturation to the variables investigated is
presented in a series of 16 tables each for the 18 geographical sites. Because
of the space required for presentation, these 288 tables are positioned at the
rear of the text (Appendices A through P..)
The median COHb and 90% COHb range for the various locations within
each of the 1J8 sampling sites are presented in the "A" tables. In each sam-
pling area an effort was made to include persons from urban, suburban,
rural, and airport terminal locations. Persons sampled in urban areas with
high automobile density consistently had COHb saturations greater than those-
measured in persons sampled in areas of low automobile density. This was
dramatically evident in the comparison of individuals working on Governor's
Island where the average COHb saturation was 0. 8%, half that of persons
donating blood in adjacent New York City areas.
13
-------
Table 1.
MEDIAN COHb SATURATION AND 90% RANGE
FOR SMOKERS AND NONSMOKERS
Location
Chicago
New York
Washington, D. C.
Ve rmont - New
Hampshire
Nonsmoker
1.7 (1 to 3.2)
1.2 (0. 6 to 2. 5)
1.2 (0. 6.to 2; 5)
1.2 (0. 8 to ,2. 1)
New Orleans
Seattle
San Francisco
Honolulu
Anchorage
Los Angeles
Salt Lake City
Phoenix
Houston
St. Louis
Denver
Miami
Detroit
ivinwaukee
1.6 (1. to 3. )
1. 5 (0.8 to 2.7)
I. 5 (0.8 to 2.7)
1.4 (0.7 to 2. 5)
1. 5 (0. 6 to 3.2)
1.8 (1.0 to 3.0)
1.2 (0.6 to 2.5)
1.2 (0. 5 to 2. 5)
1.2 (0.6 to 3.5)
1.4 (0. 9 to 2. 1)
2.0 (0.9 to 3.7)
1. 2 (0.4 to 3.0)
1.6 (0.7 to 2.7)
1.2 (0. 5 to 2. 5)
Cigarette
Smoker
5.8 (2.0 to 9.9)
4.8 (1.2 to 9. 1)
4. 9 (1. 2 to 8.4)
4. 8 (1.4 to 9.0)
5. 5 (2.0 to 9.6)
5.7 (1.7 to 9. 6)
5.4 (1. 6 to 9.8)
4.9 (1.6 to 9.0)
4.7 (0.9 to 9. 5)
6.2 (2.0 to 10. 3)
5. 1 (1. 5 to 9.5)
4. 1 (0. 9 to 8.7)
3. 2 (1.0 to 7.8)
5. \ n, 7 to Q, ?)
5. 5 (2.0 to 9.8)
5.0 (1.2 to 9.7)
5. 6 (1. 6 to 10.4)
4.2 (1.0 to 8.9)
Other
Smoker
3. 5 (1. 5 to 10.0)
2. 5 (0.9 to 8. 5)
2. 5 (1.0 to 9.8)
2.0 (0.9 to 8. 3)
4.0 (1.7 to 9. 5)
4.0 (1. 2 to 10.4)
3.4 (1. 2 to 10. 5)
3.0 (1.2 to 8. 2)
5. 1 (1.7 to 8. 1)
3. 6 (1.4 to 10. 0)
5. 1 (1.4 to 9.2)
2. 3 (0. 6 to 7.2)
3.2*
4.8 (1. 6 to 10. 1)
2.0 (0.7 to 10. 5)
2. 5 (1. 0 to 10. 5)
2. 3 (0.8 to 10. 3)
#four observations, no range calculated
14
-------
Table 2.
Percentage of Non-Smokers
Having Carboxyhemoglobin Saturations Greater Than 1.5%
City
Anchorage
Chicago
Denver
Detroit
Honolulu
Houston
Los Angeles
Miami
Milwaukee
New Orleans
New York
Phoenix
St. Louis
Salt Lake City
San Francisco
Seattle
Vermont, New Hampshire
Washington, D. C.
Number of
Non-Smokers
COHb> 1.5%
152
401
744
1172
503
240
2886
398
2720
159
2291
147
671
544
660
585
959
850
56%
74%
76%
42%
39%
30%
76%
33%
26%
59%
35%
24%
35%
27%
61%
55%
18%
35%
15
-------
There was a moderately wide range of COHb saturations observed
among donors sampled in the urban areas. These urbanites consistently had
higher COHb saturations than those measured in persons sampled in subur-
ban areas and rural areas.
Both the median and the mean COHb saturation of blood donors from
the urban areas of Denver, Los Angeles and Chicago were higher than those
observed in donors in urban New York and Washington, D. C. This observa-
tion was not proof that the ambient CO levels in Denver, Los Angeles, and
Chicago were higher than in the other two cities, but that the specific locales
sampled had higher average ambient CO levels than the average of the locales
visited in New York City and Washington, D. C.
One observation did, however, suggest that the ambient CO levels in
Denver, Los Angeles, and Chicago were higher than those in New York City.
During the sampling period at the East Blood Center a weather inversion
occurred in New York City, which was associated with COHb saturations
comparable to those observed in the other three cities during fair weather
periods.
The COHb saturations of persons working in the terminals at
J. F. Kennedy and O'Hare International Airports were as high as those from
areas of high automobile density in New York City and Chicago.
The frequency distribution of COHb for the 18 sampling areas is
presented in the "B" tables. A few non-smokers in each city had strikingly
elevated COHb saturations indicating that certain segments of the population
16
-------
are at risk of CO exposure of a magnitude comparable to that experienced by
the tobacco smoker.
The variables of race, sex, height, weight, and barometric pressure
exerted little influence on the COHb saturation of blood donors. These data
are presented in the "C", "D", "E", "F" and "G" tables.
The "H" tables show the influence of the time of blood sampling upon
COHb saturation.
Higher COHb saturations were associated with higher hemoglobin con-
centrations. These data are presented in the "I", MJ" and "K" tables.
While this positive correlation was most striking in the tobacco smoker, it
was minimally, but definitely present in those non-smokers with high COHb
saturations.
The combined influence of age, sex, race, and smoking upon COHb
saturation is shown in the "L" tables. Only tobacco smoking exerted a
demonstrable effect.
The effect of the number of cigarettes smoked and the time since the
last cigarette upon COHb saturation is presented in the "M" tables. These
data are of excellent quality, indicative of the high order of reliability of the
que s tionnai r e.
In the "N" tables occupations are subdivided into 4 categories: home-
oriented, white collar, blue collar, and brown collar (farm). Each category
is further subdivided into three subgroups: sex, age, and smoking habits.
Tobacco smoking in any subgroup was associated with the highest COHb
17
-------
saturations observed. Housewives generally had the lowest COHb satura-
tions.
The effect of the one meteorological condition which influenced COHb
saturation is shown in the "O" and "P" tables. The following meteorological
data were available from the National Weather Service for the sampling sites:
barometric pressure, temperature, visibility and wind speed. Of these
parameters, only wind speed had a positive influence on COHb saturation.
While wind speed was a statistically significant factor influencing COHb satu-
ration, it exerted a relatively minor influence. •
To more completely investigate the influence of occupation upon COHb
saturation, the blood donors were arbitrarily placed in one of six occupational
groupings.
Group 1: Professional, Clerical and Service
Engineering, science, medicine, education, law, religion,
art, entertainment, managers, administrators, secre-
taries, computing and accounting, barbers, miscel-
laneous personal service.
Group 2: Factory Workers
Manufacture of metal, paper, gas, oil, chemical, wood,
stone, glass, and textiles.
Group 3; Vehicle Related
Professional drivers , salesman, protective services ,
18
-------
mechanics, excavating, paving, motor freight and other
transportation occupations.
Group 4: Students
Group 5: Housewives
Group 6: All Others
The "P" tables present the COHb data for the six groups in the four
sub-areas for each of the 18 major sampling sites. Two wind speed categories
have been introduced to further reduce the bias introduced by weather.
Table 3 lists the CQHb saturation in non-smokers by occupation.
There were significant differences between occupational groups. Students
and housewives had the lowest COHb concentrations. Other low COHb groups
included occupations associated with mental health, education, library science,
religion, art, road paving, and entertainment. The vehicle-related occu-
pational groups had higher !COHb saturations than most groups for wind
speeds > 5 mph. Other high COHb groups included those associated with
metal processing, chemical processing, stone and glass processing, printing,
welding, electrical assembly and repair, and graphic art.
Taxicab drivers generally had COHb saturations among the highest
observed in any occupational group. In New York City, 14 non-smokers
were sampled on October 18, 1970. Eight cab drivers coming from work had
a mean COHb of 2. 5% saturation with a range from 1. 3 to 5. 8%. Six, off-
duty cab drivers coming from home had COHb saturations ranging from 1. 0
19
-------
Table 3. CARBOXYHEMOGLOBIN SATURATION IN NON-SMOKERS BY OCCUPATION
All Cities
COHl
Arch. , Engineering
Math, Science 1
Medical, Health (profe VI) 1
Education
Library 1
Law 1
Religion 1
Writing
Art 1
Entertainment
Administration, Managrrs
Profess'L classified)
.71
.60
.48
.41
.40
.59
.41
.53
.47
.36
.73
.64
Secretary . ;1.57
Computing. Account^, ,, _ „
Miscellaneous Clerical
Salesman, Merchandisiig
Building Service
Barbering
Misc. Personal Service
) Apparel Furnishing Seiv.
Protective Service
Plant and Animal Care
Fishing, Hunting
Metal Processing
Mineral Processing
Food Processing
Paper Processing
Oil and Gas Processinc
.63
.67
1.78
1.99
1.68
1.73
.67
1.51
1. 53
1.87
1.75
1.50
1.67
1.69
Chemical Processing 2.22
Wood Processing
1.76
Stone and Glass Processing! . 88
Textile Processing
1.50
Mechanics & Machine R.-pairl. 76
Printing
Processing Occup. , Other
Science Equipment Repair
Welding
1.86
1.74
1.62
2. 14
Electrical Assemb., Repair!!. 85
Painting, Plastering
1.79
Excavating, Paving jl.26
Construction, Other
Motor Freight
Transportation Occup.0,' her
Packaging and Handling
Unable to Classify
Distribution of Utilities
Retired
Graphic Art
Students
Housewives
1.77
1.95
1.89
2.24
1.82
1.92
1.64
2.01
1.41
1.46
No.
285
411
262
567
37
57
57
40
48
46
382
292
531
421
919
337
114
14
68
63
425
65
6
408
25
166
8
11
42
66
24
12
425
151
65
I
27
34
37
9
132
7
204
9<3
240
32
38
4
1466
784
SA
0.76
0.77
0.58
0.75
0.68
0.62
0.40
0.57
0.57
0.96
0.85
0.71
0.76
0.71
0.92
0.93
0.89
0.01
1. 14
0.64
0. °0
0.78
0. 18
0.82
0. 58
0.99
0. 39
0.34
1. 16
0.97
1.08
0.54
0.85
0.81
1.01
0.77
1. 15
0.93
1.03
0.54
0.91
1.04
0.96
1. 37
1.20
1.20
0.52
0.8
0.8
0. 78
age
1.9,!
2.20
1.6"
1.34
--
..
0. 90
2. 00
..
2.40
2.0!
2. 3C
2. 30
1. 33
1.81
2.67
--
--
--
--
1.34
--
1.40
1.60
--
1.75
--
--
--
1.45
--
--
1.94
2. 10
2.35
--
_ _
1.64
..
--
2. 10
--
2. 30
6.25
1. 12
1.40
--
--
1.60
1.08
Chicago
1.90
2.47
1.90
2.90
--
-.
1.90
--
..
1.20
1.98
2.06
1.73
1.84
2.61
2. 18
1.70
--
.-
--
2. 15
2. 10
--
2. 12
2.20
3.97
--
--
--
0.40
--
--
3. 12
--
2. 10
--
_ .
1.92
--
--
--
2. 15
2.36
1.70
2. 31
2. 30
--
--
1.73
1.57
Denver
2.03
1.69
1.92
1.93
..
2.07
1.80
--
..
2.52
2.42
1. 9°
1.91
2. 38
2. 12
2.25
2. 10
2. 97
2.01
--
1.87
2. 14
2. 10
2.64
2.23
2. 16
--
2.35
4.00
1.87
--
--
2.33
1.95
0.75
--
2.00
2.44
2.68
--
2.63
2.38
1.75
2.26
2.44
1.50
1. 30
2.70
1.90
1.97
Detroit
1.57
1.56
1.27
1.10
--
2. 17
--
1. 30
1.86
2.00
1.74
1.59
1. 35
1. 59
1. 59
1.61
1.75.
1.10
1.00
1.77
1. "0
1.80
--
1.78
2.40
1.08
-- .
--
1. 34
1. 56
1.67
--
1.49
1. 50
1.69
2.00
2.65
2. 32
1.52
3.20
1.77
3. 10
0.93
1.42
1.84
2.50
1. 10
--
0.99
1.59
-lonolulu
1.52
1.78
1.86
1.34
-.
2.60
1.40
1.75
..
1.40
1.42
1.26
1.24
1. 58
1.45
1.44
1. 97
--
1.27
1. 10
.1. 54
1.26
-.
1.06
--
1.98
--
--
--
1.05
--
--
1.55
1.80
1. 30
--
1.87
1.58
2.03
1.80
1.66
1.47
1.88
2. 13
1. 37
1.73
1.44
0.75
1.45
1.36
Houston
1.70
1.80
1.48
2.00
--
1.70
1.00
--
..
..
1. 37
.80
. 15
. 58
. 97
.47
..
..
1. 50
--
1 . 1 ^
--
--
1. 58
-•
--
--
--
--
1.40
--
1.40
0.95
--
1. 57
1.20
2.40
1.65
1.00
—
1. 1°
1.40
2.05
1. 25
2.53
1.30
--
2.40
1. 11
1.20
Los
Angeles
1.95
1.95
1.94
1.84
2.30
2.00
1.87
1.99
1.73
1.05
2.04
2. 13
2.00
1.93
2. 10
1. "9
2.01
2.77
1.73
2.40
2. 12
1.00
-.
2.03
2. 4.5
1. 17
-- '
1.83
2. 34
1.98
2.77
1.70
2.06
1.80
2.00
--
2. 01
2.05
2.02
1.40
2.09
2. 14
2. 16
2.81
2. 16
2.27
1.74
2.09
2.02
1.86
Miami
1.79
1. 15
1. 11
1. 31
..
1.48
1.20
1.60
1.60
3.55
1.48
1.45
1. 12
1.00
1.43
1. 11
1.40
--
2.07
--
1. 55
0.70
--
I. 58
--
1.27
--
--
0.80
1. 10
2.40
--
1.43
--
--
--
_ —
1.28
0.43
0.40
1. 18
1.50
1.51
2.20
1.02
--
1.20
2. 10
1. 33
0.92
New
Orleans
0.90
0.00
1.70
3.51
.-
.-
1.20
--
..
..
2.80
1.45
1.00
3.38
1.62
1. 35
--
1. 30
1. 54
2. IT
1.60
1 . t. <
--
1.88
--
'1.42
--
1. 10
1.70
3. 10
1.67
2.50
1.90
2.00
1.90
1.90
1.80
2. 19
1.74
1. 51
2.77
1.89
--
2.20
--
1.61
1.74
New
York
1.38
1. 31
1.34
1. 34
1.67
1.29
1.20
1.55
0.98
0.70
1.57
1.44
1. 38
1. 14
J.23
1.24
1.48
--
1.63
I. 90
0.95
l.t.5
--
l.f.7
I. 90
1. 15
--
2. 10
--
1.00
--
2.07
1.71
1.91
3.40
1.70
1. 54
1.60
--
1.95
2. 15
2.06
1.05
1.59
2.57
3.35
1.73
1. 19
1. 14
Phoenix
1.80
2.00
0.73
1. 12
--
1.40
--
1.20
..
..
1.07
..
1. 10
1.40
1. 11
1. 10
1. 15
-.
1.40
.-
1. 10
1.47
..
2.70
--
1.13
--
--
-.
3.05
1.00
0.40
1.33
--
-.
--
3.80
0.70
1.97
0.80
2. 35
..
1. 37
1.05
--
.-
1. 55
1.23
St.
Louis
1.24
1.26
1.44
1.26
--
1.48
1. 37
1.40
1.48
..
1.43
1. 59
1. 36
1.35
1.43
1.83
1. 55
1.30
..
1.81
1.92
1.15
..
1.82
1.27
1.45
--
.-
. 30
.40
.55
. 30
.60
1.82
1.05
--
1 40
1.58
2.00
.-
1.46
2.00
1.66
1.00
1.62
1.40
1.40
1.80
1. 50
1.44
Salt
Lake
City
1.25
1.59
1.28
1. 14
0.80
1.45
1.40
1.20
..
1.70
1. 19
0.86
1.01
1.52
1.40
1.41
1. 30
0.90
0.85
1.00
1.74
1.09
..
1.42
1.48
1. 16
..
1. 30
--
2.98
0.85
.-
1.84
..
..
..
1 45
1.73
1.80
0.90
1.26
2.84
1.95
1.24
1.46
1.60
.-
--
1.43
1.22
San
Francisco
2.00
1.64
1.33
. 39
.27
.87
.05
. 15
.45
.70
.76
.62
.60
.64
.60
.76
.87
.20
1. 54
..
1.47
..
2.03
..
2.00
1.60
..
..
0. 90
2. 10
1.50
1.92
2.02
2.20
..
1.84
1. 13
-.
1.97
1.73
1.75
2.48
1.61
2. 37
1.72
2.22
2.00
1.43
Seattle
1.62
1.68
1. 34
1.50
1.80
2.60
1. 15
1.00
1.00
1.50
1.87
1.49
1.45
1.53
1.51
1.58
2.00
._
1. 10
..
1.78
0.80
1. 53
1.80
1.80
..
1.23
2.07
1.50
1.67
1.87
0.90
..
1 43
1. 54
3.40
1.70
1.35
1.67
1.92
3.07
1. 55
1. 50
1.5.2
1.49
Vermont
-N. H.
1. 17
1.22
1.32
1.47
1.20
1.20
1. 14
--
1. 12
..
1.49
1.40
1.48
1.25
1.30
1.68
2.03
I. 37
I.2R
..
1.84
2.00
1.73
-.
1. 20
1. (•<*
0.90
1. 30
1.50
1.20
1.46
--
1.20
1. 10
3. 20
1.59
1. 53
1.25
1.87
2. 37
2. 14
1. 36
1. 33
1.70
2.76
1. 18
1. 32
Washington i
D. C.
1.32
1.40
1. 14
1.28
1.14
1.56
1.58
1. 18
1. 37
1.70
1. 55
1.43
1.24
1. 50
1.43
1.79
1. 30
2.00
1.72
1. 39
1. 32
..
.-
1.9Q
..
_.
..
2.20
1.40
1. 10
2.09
1.60
0.90
-.
2.07
1. 10
..
1.97
2.00
1.72
2. 50
1. 50
1.00
1.48
1.90
0.90
1.02
ro
o
-------
to 1. 5% with a mean of 1. 2%. Twelve cigarette-smoking cab drivers coming
from work had a mean COHb saturation of 6. 9% with a range of 3. 0 to 13. 0%.
It was very obvious that tobacco smoking was the single most important
factor responsible for the highest COHb saturations observed, and the COHb
saturations measured in the smoking population as reported here are in excel-
lent agreement with those reported by others ' . However, it appears
that the COHb saturation in smokers was additionally elevated because of non-
tobacco CO sources in the environment. Data from the "M" tables are com-
bined in Table 4 to demonstrate this phenomenon.
In none of the locales studied was there a sufficient quantity of ambient
air CO data to permit correlation with the blood donors' COHb. Furthermore,
there was poor correlation between the CO concentration measured in the
blood bank facilities with the ambient CO concentration outside the facilities.
This discrepancy was due in part to the-location of the air intakes for the
buildings and points to the difficulty in attempting to relate isolated street-
level CO concentrations to. a person's total CO exposure.
COMMENTS
The most relevant finding to come out of this 30-month study was the
astounding observation that 45% of all the non-smoking blood donors tested
had COHb saturations greater than 1. 5%. In the cities of Denver and
Los Angeles, which feature zones of high automobile density, fewer than
21
-------
Table 4.
MEAN COHb SATURATION IN CIGARETTE SMOKERS
ONE-HOUR AFTER LAST CIGARETTE
ro
Milwaukee
New Hampshire-Vermont
New York City
Washington, Da C.
Los Angeles
Chicago
Quantity of Cigarettes Smokes Per Day
Ion-Smoker < 1/2 Pack 1/2-1 Pack 1 Pack 1 1/2 Pack 2 Packs
1,3
1.4
1.4
1.4
2.0
2.0
3.0
3.3
3.1
3.8
4.0
4.8
4.2
4.4
4.3
4.6
5.2
5.4
5.3
5.7
4.7
5.2
6.0
6.3
6,2
6,7
508
5,8
7,4
7.1 '
407
5.3
6.3
6.6
7.5
7.7
-------
one quarter of the non-smoking blood donors had COHb saturations lower than
1. 5%. If current research scientifically validates the Air Quality Standards
for CO, excessive exposure to CO is widespread and occurring regularly.
While it was anticipated that none of the major metropolitan areas surveyed in
1069-1972 would meet the Air Quality Standards for CO, it was surprising to
find that the smaller towns in New Hampshire and Vermont had ambient CO
concentrations above permissible levels.
One reaction to the large number of non-smokers with COHb saturations
greater than 1. 5% is a temptation to deny'the validity of the observation by
questioning the accuracy of the COHb analytical method which was employed.
To answer this charge before it could be seriously considered, the two experi-
%
ments described in the investigation were performed using volunteer subjects.
The two COHb analytical methods employed detected the low COHb saturations
in the volunteers who breathed CO-free air. This demonstrated that the ana-
lytical methods possessed the necessary sensitivity to detect low COHb satu-
rations. Furthermore, the two analytical methods were able to accurately
determine the COHb saturations of the volunteer subjects exposed to discon-
tinuous and fluctuating CO exposures in the controlled environment chamber.
This experiment demonstrated that the methods were accurate over the range
of COHb saturations most critical to the conclusions reached in this study.
Therefore, the authors contend that the COHb saturations reported are accu-
rate and valid.
23
-------
Of the variables examined which influenced COHb saturation, tobacco
smoking was the most dominant. Carboxyhemoglobin saturations in smokers
* j .'
•were proportional to the quantity of tobacco used and placed the smoking
population in an unique group who are experiencing CO exposures an order
of magnitude greater than any other segment of the population. The geo-
graphical location of the individual, his occupation, and the existing meteoro-
logic conditions were the other chief factors influencing the COHb saturation.
Urban dwellers had consistently higher COHb saturations than did their counter-
parts from adjacent rural areas.
Large international airports, O'Hare and J. F. Kennedy, featured
surprisingly high ambient. CO levels attributed in part to jet engine CO pro-
duction and in part to the heavy automobile density near the automatically
opening and closing doors at airport terminal entrances. Persons with
advanced heart or lung disease planning to travel in aircraft pressurized for
6, 000 feet could, as a result of prolonged CO exposure in airport terminals,
unknowingly subject themselves to an additional anoxic stress which could
prove detrimental.
While the stability of the hemoglobin concentration in the blood samples
was unknown for the blood samples analyzed in the investigation, it was of
interest to observe the strong correlation between elevated COHb saturations
and the corresponding elevation of hemoglobin concentration. While it was not
surprising that the segment of the population heavily exposed to CO as a
result of tobacco smoking would demonstrate a compensatory increase in
24
-------
hemoglobin concentration, it was interesting to observe that the non-smoking
segment of the population experiencing the highest CO exposure from non-
tobacco sources also showed significant compensatory increases in COHb
saturation. Should this finding be corroborated, it would appear that man has
the potential for compensating in part for the minor anoxic stress induced by
slightly elevated COHb saturations.
The thought that a recipient of a unit of blood from a heavy tobacco
smoker would have his total body burden of CO increased, raises the question
of the efficacy of the administration of a unit of blood having less oxygen-
carrying capacity than would a unit from a non-smoker. The fact that the
biological half-life of CO in donor blood once it is circulating in the recipient
is approximately 5 hours indicates that the administration of blood from a
tobacco smoker is probably not a serious consideration in the majority of
instances. However, in those cases where the recipient has a seriously
compromised cardiovascular reserve, the administration of blood with a high
carboxyhemoglobin saturation might be unwise as the primary purpose for the
administration is to improve oxygen transport.
The major purpose of this investigation was to establish the range of
CO exposure experienced by the American population in 1969-1972. In
accomplishing this task it has been established that a significant percentage
of the population is chronically exposed to CO concentrations in excess of
those permitted by the Air Quality Standards. These baseline data can now
be used to measure the effectiveness of the anti-pollution measures that we
as a nation develop and employ.
25
-------
REFERENCES
1. W. H. Forbes, F. Sargent, and F. J. W. Roughton: The Rate of Carbon
Monoxide Uptake by Normal Men. Amer. Jr. Phys. 143:594-608
(1945).
2. R. D. Stewart, J. E. Peterson, E. D. Baretta, H. C. Dodd, M. J.
Hosko, and A. A. Herrmann: Experimental Human Exposure to Carbon
Monoxide. Arch. Environ. Health. 2Jjl54-l64 (1970).
3. J. E. Peterson, R. D. Stewart: Absorption and Elirrvnation of Carbon
Monoxide by Inactive Young Men. Arch. Environ. Health. 2^:165-171
(1970).
4. A. Ringold, J. R. Goldsrrvth, H. L. Helwig, R. Finn, and F. Schuette:
Estimating Recent Carbon Monoxide Exposures. Arch. Environ. Health.
2:308-318 (1962).
5. J. E. Peterson: Postexposure Relationship of Carbon Monoxide in Blood
and Expired Air. Arch. Environ. Health. 2J_:172-173 (1970).
6. K. M. Dubowski, and J. L. Luke: Measurement of Carboxyhemoglobin
and Carbon Monoxide in Blood. Annals of Clin. Lab. Sci. 3:53-65
(1973).
7. A. L. Malenfant, S. R. Gambino, A. J. Waraksa, and E. T. Rowe:
Spectrophotometric Determ'nation of Hemoglobin Concentration and
Percent Oxyhemoglobin and Carboxyhemoglobin Saturation. Clin.
Chem. 14:789 (1968).
26
-------
8, Collison, H. A., Rodkey, F. L. and O'Neal, J. D. : Determination
of Carbon Monoxide in Blood by Gas Chromatography. Clin. Chem,
_14:162-171 (1968).
9. K. Porter, and P. H. Volman: Flame lonization Detection of Carbon
Monoxide for Gas Chromatographic Analysis. Analytical Chemistry.
V. _34. No. 7, June (1962).
10. Baretta, E. D. , Graff, S. A., and Donohoo, K. K. Analysis of Carbon
Monoxide in the Blood and Breath of Man. Report No. ENVIR MED
MCW CRC - COHb 73-2. (submitted for publication).
11. Dodd, H. C. , Sytkowski, A. J., Terry, L. C. and Stewart, R. D. :
Analysis of Carboxyhemoglobin with a Helium-Ionization Detector.
Report No. ENVIR MED MCW CRC - COHb 73-3. (submitted for
publication).
12. Peterson, I.E. and Stewart, R. D. : Predicting the Carboxyhemoglobin
Levels Resulting from Carbon Monoxide Exposures. Report No. CRC
APRAC CAPM - 3 - 68 MCOW - ENVM - CO - 73 - 1. (submitted for
publication).
13. R. F. Coburn, R. E. Forster, P. B. Kane: Considerations of the
Physiological Variables that Determine the Blood Carboxyhemoglobin
Concentration in Man. _J. Clin. Invest. J14:1899-1910 (1965).
14. The Health Consequences of Smoking: A Report of the Surgeon General,
1972. U. S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare, Public
Health Service, 1972.
27
-------
15. S. I. Cohen, N. M. Perkins, H. K. Ury, and J. R. Goldsmith: Carbon
Monoxide Uptake in Cigarette Smoking. Arch. Environ. Health.
22:55-60 (1971).
28
-------
APPENDIX A.
Table A-l.
ANCHORAGE
MEDIAN COHb AND 90% COHb RANGE FOR NON-SMOKERS AND
CIGARETTE SMOKERS AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS
Location
Blood Center
Holy Cross
Red Devil
Nikolai
Nonsmokers
103.
1.7
.9-2.8
14.
1.5
.4-2.2
1.0
.6-8.2
insufficient
.7
.5=1.4
Cigarette
Smokers
81.
5.9
.9-9.9
24.
2.3
.9-6.3
12.
4.8
1.2-7.2
insufficient
data
30.
2.5
1.0-4.7
A-l
-------
Table A-2.
CHICAGO
MEDIAN COHb AND 90% COHb RANGE FOR NON-SMOKERS AND
CIGARETTE SMOKERS AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS
Cigarette
Location Nonsmokera Smokera
Loyola Lakeahore 148. 83.
1.5 3.6.
1.0-2.? 1.2-7.8
Michael Reese 41. 163.
2.1 5.9
1.0-3.7 2.3-9.9
A.B. Dick, Nllea 80. 81.
1.7 6.1
1.2-2.7 2.5-9.6
O'Hara (Airport) 32. 16.
2.5 6.6
1.8-3.0 5.2-11.1
Imperial Eastman, 34. 47.
Nlles 2.0 6.8
1.5-2,7 3.2-10.4
Ward* 30. 34.
2.7 6.9
2.2-3.7 3.2-9.3
Palatine 41. 16.
1.4 4.8
.8-4.4 1.5-7.7
A-2
-------
Table A-3.
DENVER
MEDIAN COHb AND 90% COHb RANGE FOR NON-SMOKERS AND
CIGARETTE SMOKERS AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS
Cigarette
Location Nonsmokers Smokers
Blood Center 676. 884.
2.0 5.5
1.0-3.7 2.0-9.9
Boulder 27. 13.
1.2 4.5
.6-2.1 1.2-7.7
Frontier Air Lines 42. 16.
(Airport) 1.5 5.8
.8-2.5 2.7-9.1
A-3
-------
Table A-4.
DETROIT
MKDIAN COHb AND 90% COHb RANGE FOR NON-SMOKERS AND
CIGARETTE SMOKERS AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS
Location
Chrysler
G.M. Tech Center
Formoco
Reefer Mfg Co.
Wynandotte
Binai Britl;
Pius Southj ate
Park Davis
Nonsnokers
23.
i.!>-:L-6
34;,.
I A
.8-2o2
s:s.
H.0
1.0-3.7
20.
I..O
5!*.
1.3
.9-4,6
59.
.7-3.6
4V.
I.. 2
.4-2,0
Cigarette
Smokers Location Nonsmekers
40.
6.3
3.7-9.3
145.
1.7-9.5
7!2
2.7-10,4
30.
6.4
4.5-10.5
40.
6.4
3.0-10.7
17.
5.9
2.0-9.6
34.
6.5
2.5-10.7
28.
5.1
.7-8.2
IBM 25
1.4
-.7-2.3
Rouge 42 .
..6-3.6
Warren 74.
1.6
.9-2.7
St. Glair 17.
1.0
.9-3.0
Dye and Machine 86.
Plant 1.4
.6-2.5
Ypsilanti 101.
.9
.6-1.2
Rochester 82.
1.2
.8-2.3
Downtown 57.
1.2
1.0-1.8
Cigarette
Smokers
17.
5.6
2.2-10.5
31.
6.0
i.6-9.6
40.
6.2
1.8-10.3
38.
6.1
2.5-10.5
70.
6.0
3oO-8.5
41.
3.5
1.2-6.1
58.
5.9
2.0-9.4
33.
6.0
2.3-9.0
-------
Table A-5.
HONOLULU
MEDIAN COHb AND 90% COHb RANGE FOR NON-SMOKERS AND
CIGARETTE SMOKERS AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS
Cigarette
Smokers
175. - 160.
io2 4.7
.6-2.5 1.6-9.0
1.4 5o4
1.0-2o7 2.0=9.6
138. 134.
1.4 4.9
.7-2.0 2.0-8.2
-------
I
Ol
Table A- 6.-
HOUSTON
MEDIAN COHb AND 90% COHb RANGE FOR NON-SMOKERS AND
CIGARETTE SMOKERS AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS
Location
Blood Center
Sweeney
Unim Hall
Church
Prairie View
Hobby (Airport)
Nonsmokers
75.
1.2
.6-2.8
7.
.9
*
11.
1.4
*
8.
2.2
*
10.
1.4
*
15.
.9
*
Cigarette
Smokers Location Nonsmokers
4.
2.6
*
insufficient
data
1.
7.4
*
1.
8.2 .
*
4.
2.0
*
2.
4.0
La Porte 14.
.8
*
Hunt s vi lie 15.
.7
<*
Downtown 17.
1.2
*
Jersey Acres 38.
1.2
.8-2.7
Texas City 27.
1.4
1.0-2.7
K-Mart 8.
13.4
* *
Cigarette
Smokers
I.
4.4
*
I.
.7
*
1.
2.1
*
1.
7.8
*
2.
5.5
*
insuffic
dati
* For sample sizes less than 20, the 90% COHb range is not computed.
-------
Table A-7.
LOS ANGELES
MEDIAN COHb AND 90% COHb RANGE FOR NON-SMOKERS AND
CIGARETTE SMOKERS AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS
Location
Burbank
Torrance
Long Beach
El Segundo
Hollywood
Van Nuys
El Toro
El Monte
Blood Center
Reseda
Nonsmokers
419.
1.8
1.0-3.4
58.
1.9
1,5-2.3
105.
1.6
1.2-5.4
172.
11.0
148.
2.2
1.4-3.0
361.
1.8
1.0-2.7
31.
1.8
1.5-6.9
119.
2.0
1.2-3.2
15.
2.7
*
28.
1.8
1.5-2.2
Cigarette
Smokera Location Non smokers
295.
6.5
2.5-10.5
46.
6.3
2.0-10.5
59.
5.2
1.5-9.4
66.
5.9
2.0-9.9
130.
6.2
2.5-10.0
208.
6.8
2.0-10.7
62.
5.3
1.5-7.8
108.
5.9
2.5-10.2
13.
7.5
*
8.
6.2
*
Duarte 51.
1.7
1.5-4.5
Westwood 127.
2.0
1.2-2.8
Eagle Rock 117.
2.0
1.5-2.5
Anaheim 525.
1.7
.6-2.3
Downtown . 166.
2.7
1.0-3.2
Hawthorn 72.
2.2
1.7-2.7
Huntington Beach 72.
1.6
1.2-2.3
Glendale 61.
1.7
1.4-2.0
Airport 213.
1.4
1.0-2.1
Century City 30.
1.4
1.0-1.8
Cigarette
Smokers
39.
6.3
3.4-9.4
62.
6.3
2.2-10.7
16.
4.3
*
212.
6.4
3.2-9.7
108.
6.0
2.0-9.4
39.
7.0
2.5-8.7
37.
6.1
2.0-9.0
27.
6.1
2.0-9.1
75.
5.6
1.2-9.6
21.
6.3
2.0-8.3
For sample sizes less than 20, the 90% COHb range is not computed^
-------
Table A-8.
MIAMI
MEDIAN COHb AND 90% COHb RANGE FOR NON-SMOKERS AND
CIGARETTE SMOKERS AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS
Cigarette
Location Nonsmokera Smokers
Blood Center 285. 559.
1.2 5.2
.4-6.9 1.0-11.2
South 37. 104.
1.0 3.9
.5-3.2 1.2-8.1
Merchandise Mart 21. 14.
1.4 7.3
.8-1.6 *
Downtown 40* 40.
1.0 . 4.1
.4-2.3 .9-9.6
Airport 17• 14.
.9 5.5
* *
*
For sample sizes less than 20, the 90% COHb range is not
computed.
A-8
-------
Table A-9.
MILWAUKEE
MEDIAN COHb AND 90% COHb RANGE FOR NON-SMOKERS AND
CIGARETTE SMOKERS AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS
Location
Milwaukee County
General Hospital
Milwaukee Children's
Hospital
Fewaukee
Milwaukee
Blood Center
Allen Bradley Labs
Brookfield
Brown Deer
V.A. Hospital
Cedarburg
Nonsmokers
1831.
1.2
.4-3.4
193.
1.0
.5-2.5
120.
1.0
.6-2.5
209.
1.4
.4-3.0
102.
1.4
.6-2.7
72
.8
.4-3.2
92.
1.4
.6-3.5
5.
.7
*
121.
1.0
.5-2.1
Cigarette
Smokers
1117.
3.7
.8-9.1
2.
1.2
*
61.
5.3
.9-8.6
180.
5.3
1.0-11.9
72.
5.2
1.2-9.3
31.
5.8
.9-9.5
59.
7.0
1.4-9.8
2.
6.9
*
68.
5.5
1.0-9.5
''" For sample sizes less than 20, the 90% COHb range is not
computerized.
A-9
-------
Table A-10.
NEW ORLEANS
MEDIAN COHb AND 90% COHb RANGE FOR NON-SMOKERS AND
CIGARETTE SMOKERS AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS
Cigarette
Location Nonstnokera Smokers
Charity 142. 324.
1.6 5.3
1.0-3.0 2.0-9.2
Buras 16. 22.
1.4 5.9
* 2.8-9.6
*For sample sizes less than 20, the 907. COHb range is not computed.
A-10
-------
Table A-11. .
NEW YORK CITY
MEDIAN COHb AND 90% COHb RANGE FOR NON-SMOKERS AND
CIGARETTE SMOKERS AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS
Location
Islip
Mat. Life Auditorium
Long Island
Bronx
Manhattan
J.F.K. (Airport)
Brooklyn
Hightstown, N.J.
Non smokes1 @
116.
1.4
.9-2.3
64.
1.2
.5-2,2
440.
1.0
.5-3.4
75.
1.4
.8-2.0
841.
1.4
.8-2.3
38.
2.1
1.5-2.8
8.
2.1
*
46.
1.2
.8-1.7
Cigarote© •
Smoker® Location Nonsmokers
68 o
3,9
1.4=7.2
63.
4.3
1.0-7,6
215.
3.5
1.0-8.8
75.
4,7
1.6-7.6
813.
5,2
1.4=9.2
46.
6.9
2.3-10,9
16.
7.3
*
31.
4.4
1.4-10.4
Governors Island 38.
.8
.4-1.4
East Blood Center 21.
2.0
1.0-2.7
Elizabeth, N.J. 82.
1.5
.5-3.5
Holmdel, 2J.J. 146.
1.0
.6-1.6
East View, N.Y. 54.
1.4
.9-2.0
Croton, N.Y. 197.
1.0
.4-3.7
New Jersey 130.
' 1.2
.4-2.0
N.Y. Law School no samples
Cigarette
Smokers
45.
2.3
..7-4.7
24.
5.4
1.8-7,9
67.
4,6
1.2-7.6
20.
5.1
1.6-8.3
69.
5.8
2.1-8.6
113.
4.1
1.2-8.1
130.
4.9
1.4-8.5
no samp
* For sample sizes less than 20, the 90% COHb range is not computed.
-------
Table A-12.
PHOENIX
MEDIAN COHb AND 90% COHb RANGE FOR NON-SMOKERS AND
CIGARETTE SMOKERS AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS
Cigarette
Location Nonsmokers Smokers
Blood Center 145. 142.
1.2 4.0
.5-2.5 1.0-8.3
Mt. Calvary 2. 8.
.8 5.4
* *
Angel's 8.
no samples 3.7
*
For sample sizes less than 20, the 90% COHb range Is not computed.
A-12
-------
Table A-13.
ST. LOUIS
MEDIAN COHb AND 90% COHb RANGE FOR NON-SMOKERS AND
CIGARETTE SMOKERS AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS
Location Nonsmokers
St. Gen. 69.
1.2
.9-2.5
J» Mary Magdalen 119.
- 1.6
w 1.2-2.2
St. Gabriel 135.
1.2
.7-1.7
Creve Coeur 52.
1.2
.8-1.7
County 29.
1.2
.9-1.6
Aeronautical Chart 44.
1.2
.7-1.7
Cigarette
Smokers Location Nonsmokers
19.
5.4
*
77.
5.3
2.0-8.6
69.
5.7
2.0-9.2
21.
5.1
2.5-7.2
30.
6.0
1.6-7.5
16.
5.2
*
St. Andrews 27.
1.2
.7-2.2
Blood Center 20.
1.6
1.2-2.2
Webster Grove 23.
1.4
1.0-1.5
Soldier's Memorial 72.
1.4
1.0-2.0
Lambert Field 83.
(Airport) 1.5
.6-2.2
Cigarette
Smokers
6.
6.5
8.
6.8
8.
2.5
*
38.
4.8
1.7-7.4
53.
6.0
1.2-10.1
* For sample sizes less than 20, the 907. COHb range is not computed.
-------
Table A-14.
SALT LAKE CITY
MEDIAN COHb AND 90% COHb RANGE FOR NON-SMOKERS AND
CIGARETTE SMOKERS AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS
Location
Price
Helper
Draper
Salt Lake
Montlcello
BlandIng
Moab
Castledale
Tooele
Nonsmokers
40.
1.7
1.4-2.0
50.
1.4
.8-2.3
74.
1.4
.8-4.4
139.
1.2
.7-2.0
53.
.9
.5-1.7
61.
1.0
.6-1.4
33.
.9
.5-2.2
23.
.8
.4-3.9
72.
1.0
.5-2.5
Cigarette
Smoker8.
12.
6.0
*
22.
5.7
2.1-9.5
no samples
40.
4.4
1.4-9.6
6.
1.5
4.
5.8
*
17.
9.7
50.
4.8
1.5-8.4
For sample sizes less than 20, the 90% range is not computed.
A-14
-------
Table A-15.
SAN FRANCISCO
MEDIAN COHb AND 90% COHb RANGE FOR NON-SMOKERS AND
CIGARETTE SMOKERS AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS
Cigarette
Location Nonsmokers Smokers
Blood Center, 461. 301.
San Juan 1.5 5.6
.7-2.7 1.5-8.9
Downtown 119. 60.
1.8 5.1
1.2-2.7 1.7-9.8
Hunters Point 33. 29.
1.8 5.3
1.2-2.7 3.2-7.9
Nob Hill 49. 48.
1.5 4.6
1.0-2.5 2.0-9.8
A-15
-------
Table A-16.
SEATTLE
MEDIAN COHb AND 90% COHb RANGE FOR NON-SMOKERS AND
CIGARETTE SMOKERS AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS
Location Nonsm?kjrs
Boeing Plant. 2 29,
1,5
1.2 4.4
_ Bremerton Si ip Yards 6,
.? 1,4
w *
Blood Center 339,
1,5
Downtown 85.
1.6
1.0-2.3
Campus 11.
1.1
*
Kirkland 5.
Cigarette
Smokers Location Nonsmokege
24.
5.5
2.3-8.6
19.
5.1
*
193.
5.8
1.6-9.9
49.
5.2
2.0-9.6
2.
*
7.
6.0
*
South 7.
1.5
*
Auburn 42.
1.4
.5-4.2
Prince of Peace 12.
1.2
*
Airport 43.
1.4
.8-2.2
South Blood Center 6.
1.0
*
Cigarette
Smokers
6.
3.7
*
27.
7.3
2.5-9.4
5.
8.0
*
27.
5.6
2.8-9.5
2.
*
'•• For sample siz >s less than 20, the 907. COHb range is not computed.
-------
Table A-17.
VERMONT-NEW HAMPSHIRE
MEDIAN COHb AND 90% COHb RANGE FOR NON-SMOKERS AND
CJGARETTE SMOKERS AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS
Location Non smoker 8
Lyndonville, Vt. 23.
1.2
.9-1.8
Hanover, N.H. 395.
1.2
•T .4-2.5
>j
Portsmouth, N.H. 58.
1.2
.8-2.7
Richford, Vt. 28.
1.5
1.0-2.1
Littleton, N.H. 44.
1.4
.9-3.7
Berlin, N.H. 39.
1.4
1.0-2.3
Derbyline, Vt. 13.
1-5
*
Cigarette
Smoker* Location Nonsmokers
14.
4.2
*
83.
2.8
.8-6.3
31,
4.9
1.7-10.4
19.
6.6
2.0-10.4
30.
6.0
1.8-9.1
25.
4.0
1.2-8.4
10.
5.6
*
Rutland, Vt. 40.
1.0
.6-1.5
Arlington, Vt. 54.
1.2
.7-3.7
Brattleboro, Vt. 90.
1.4
1.0-3.0
North fie Id, Vt. 59.
1.2
1.0-4.6
Montpelier, Vt. 52.
1.2
.9-1.8
Whiteriver Junction, Vt. 64.
1.2
1.0-1.8
Cigarette
Smokers
25.
5.9
2.0-8.6
40.
5.4
1.6-8.5
56.
5.5
1.7-9.3
34.
5.4
1.4-8.5
36.
3.9
1.4-8.4
35.
5.6
1.4-10.4
* For sample sizes less than 20, the 90% COHb range is not computed.
-------
Table A-18.
WASHINGTON, D. C.
MEDIAN COHb AND 90% COHb RANGE FOR NON-SMOKERS AND
CIGARETTE SMOKERS AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS
Cigarette
Location Nonsmokers Smokers
Blood Center 54. 50.
1.5 5.4
.7-2.5 1.8-9.7
Maryland 394. 210.
1.2 5.4
.7-2.8 1.4-8.7
V. A. 358. 218.
1.0 4.4
.5-2.2 .9-7.7
Georgetown 27. 25.
1.2 4.0
.8-1.5 1.4-8.6
Sears 20. 23.
2.1 4.2
1.4-2.8 1.6-7.5
A-18
-------
APPENDIX B.
Table B-l.
ANCHORAGE
CARBOXYHEMOGLOBIN FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION
% COHb
0.5 1.5 2:5 3-5 4.5 5.5 6.5 7.5 8.5 9.5 10.5 11.5 25.0
Total Number
Number Non Smokers
Number Smokers
Cigarette
Other
85
66
19
17
2
94
68
26
19
7
36
11
25
21
4
13
0
13
13
0
26
0
26
21
5
20
0
20
15
5
20
1
19
16
3
16
4
12
9
3
9
0
9
7
2
6
1
5
5
0
2
0
2
2
0
1
0
1
1
0
Table B-2.
CHICAGO
CARBOXYHEMOGLOBIN FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION
a. COHb
1.5 ?.:5 3-5 4.5 5.5 6.5 7,5 8,5 9.5 10.5 11.5 25-0
Total Number
Number Non Smokers
Number Smokers
Cigarette
Other
119
104
15
11
4
270
222
48
31
17
117
63
54
43
11
59
7
52
44
8
77
1
76
63
13
75
3
72
67
5
67
1
66
64
2
59
1
58
56
2
32
0
32
30
2
19
1
18
16
2
10
0
10
10
0
8
1
7
4
3
B-]
-------
1 Table B-3.
DENVER
CARBOXYHEMOGLOBIN FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION
% COHb
0.5 1.5 ?.;5 3-.5 4.5 5.5 6.5 7.5 8.5 9.5 10.5 11.5 25.0
Octal Number
Number Non Smokers
Number Smokers
Cigarette
Other
200
179
21
15
6
475
396
79
57
22
246
124
122
104
18
163
23
140
124
16
176
10
166
144
22
156
2
154
140
14
146
4
142
127
15
109
3
106
93
13
53
0
53
48
5
39
0
39
33
6
20
0
20
18
2
16
1
15
10
5
Table B-4.
DETROIT
CARBOXYHEMOGLOBIN FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION
% COHb
0.5 1.5 ?.;5 3-.S 4.5 5.5 6.5 7.5 8.5 9.5 10.5 11.5 25.0
Total Number
Tkt^^v— -» M^-T^ o— "*;-;>-
Number Smokers
Cigarette
Other
747
490
I
/•f.™
V\»±
66
25
41
_»u_»
105
37
68
147
07
78
47
31
124
•n -*•
JLU
108
85
23
120
i
113
97
16
158
e.
156
135
21
120
3
117
106
11
98 | 68
u
98
88
10
a.
67
58
9
26
i
25
15
10
23
24
" T i
0
23
16
7
2
22
14
8
B-2
-------
Table B-5.
HONOLULU
CARBOXYHEMOGLOBIN FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION
% COHb
0.5 1.5 2.5 3.5 4.5 5.5 6.5 7.5 8.5 9.5 10.5 11.5 25.0
Total Number
Number Non Smokers
Number Smokers
Cigarette
Other
337
308
29
14
15
231
160
71
47
24
108
26
82
67
15
94
5
89
81
8
103
0
103
92
11'
94
0
94
82
12
65
3
62
55
7
51
1
50
42
8
25
0
25
24
1
10
0
10
9
1
4
0
4
4
0
6
0
6
4
2
Table B-6.
HOUSTON
CARBOXYHEMOGLOBIN FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION
% COHb
0.5
.5 ?..5 3*5 4.5 5.5 6.5 7,5 8.5 9.5 10.5 11.5 25.0
Total Number
Number Non Smokers
Number Smokers
Cigarette
Other
176
171
5
3
2
53
48
5
5
0
13
11
2
1
1
7
5
2
2
0
2
1
1
1
0
3
1
2
1
1
3
0
3
3
0
2
0
2
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
6
6
0
0
0
B-3
-------
Table B-7.
LOS ANGELES
CARBOXYHEMOGLOBIN FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION
% COHb
0.5 1.5 2.5 3-5 4.5 5.5 6.5 7.5 8.5 9.5 10.5 11.5 25.0
Total Number
Number Non Smokers
Number Smokers
Cigarette
Other
762
698
64
32
32
1858
1652
206
101
105
635
456
179
121
58
244
41
203
157
46
248
12
236
207
29
311
8
303
259
44
292
3
289
265
24
223
3
220
201
19
155
4
151
139
12
89
2
87
79
8
47
1
46
41
5
46
2
44
29
15
Table B-8. :
MIAMI
CARBOXYHEMOGLOBIN FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION
% COHb
°-5 1.5 2.5 3-5 4.5 5.5 6.5 7.5 8.5 9.5 10,5 11.5 25.0
Total Number
Number Non Smokers
Number Smokers
Cigarette
Other
338
256
82
51
31
181
92
89
62
27
117
17
100
92
8
106
S
101
92
9
117
-
9
115
110
5
118
9
116
109
7
87
/,
83
80
3
62
i
61
58
3
24
o
24
24
0
22
n
\j
22
17
5
19
„
\j
19
17
2
19
V
19
14
5
B-4
-------
Table B-9.
MILWAUKEE
CARBOXYHEMOGLOBIN FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION
% COHb
0.5
1.5 2.5 3-.5 4.5 5.5 6.5 7.5 8.5 9.5 10.5 11.5 25.0
Total Number
Number Non Smokers
Number Smokers
Cigarette
Other
2313
2009
304
219
85
798
550
248
186
62
329
92
237
207
30
307
36
271
247
24
269
13
256
234
22
206
5
201
188
13
157
6
151
138
13
95
3
92
83
9
66
0
66
63
3
27
1
26
24
2
19
0
19
12
7
24
2
22
17
5
Table B-10.
NEW ORLEANS
CARBOXYHEMOGLOBIN FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION
% CoHb
0.5
1,5 ?..5 3.5 4.5 5.5 6.5 7.5 8.5 9.5 10.5 11.5 25.0
Total Number
Number Non Smokers
Number Smokers
Cigarette
Other
73
65
8
6
2
105
78
27
22
5
47
12
35
32
}
57
2
55
SO
5
71
0
71
67
4
69
0
69
67
2
42
0
42
42
0
32
1
31
27
4
21
1
20
18
2
13
0
13
11
2
6
0
6
5
1
1
0
1
1
0
B-5
-------
Table B-ll.
NEW YORK CITY
CARBOXYHEMOGLOBIN FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION
% COHb
0.5 l,
?..5 3.5 4.5 5.5 6.5 7.5 8.5 9.5 10.5 11.5 25.0
Total Number
Number Non Smokers
Number Smokers
Cigarette
Other
1687
1452
235
135
100
953
645
308
199
109
356
106
250
201
49
326
16
310
256
54
308
5
303
271
32
269
4
265
249
16
251
5
246
217
29
144
1
143
128
15
70
0
70
64
6
44
0
44
40
4
24
i
23
17
6
18
0
18
10
8
Table B-12.
PHOENIX
CARBOXYHEMOGLOBIN FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION
% COHb
0.5
1.5 ?..5 3,.5 4.5 5.5 6.5 7.5 8.5 9.5 10.5 11.5 25.0
Toeal Number
Number Non Smokers
_
Number Smokers
Cigarette
Other
136
109
27
21
6
50
26
24
21
3
29
4
25
23
2
24
•>
22
20
2
22
0
22
21
1
28
2
26
24
2
10
0
10
9
1
11
**
\r
11
11
0
6
0
6
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
2
1
1
2
'i
1
1
0
B-6'
-------
Table B-13.
ST. LOUIS
CARBOXYHEMOGLOBIN FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION
% COHb
0-5 1.5 2.5 3-5 4.5 5.5 6.5 7.5 8.5 9.5 10.5 11.5 25.0
Total Number
Number Non Smokers
Number Smokers
Cigarette
Other
472
435
37
13
24
281
217
64
31
33
53
13
40
33
7
55
1
54
42
12
65
0
65
52
13
73
1
72
66
6
63
0
63
53
10
29
0
29
25
4
23
1
22
18
4
10
1
9
8
1
4
0
4
2
2
5
0
5
3
2
Table B-14.
SALT LAKE CITY
CARBOXYHEMOGLOBIN FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION
% COHb 0-5 1.5 ?..5 3-.5 4.5 5.5 6.5 7.5 8.5 9.5 10.5 11.5 2!
Total Number
Number Non Smokers
Number Smokers
Cigarette
Other
401
391
10
6
4
134
114
20
15
5
31
18
13
11
2
37
6
31
30
1
22
2
20
19
I
31
1
30
25
5
19
1
18
14
4
17
1
16
16
0
10
1
9
7
2
8
0
8
7
1
1
0
1
1
0
1
0
1
1
0
B-;
-------
Table B-15.
SAN FRANCISCO
CARBOXYHEMOGLOBIN FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION
% COHb
0 = 5 1.5 2.5 3..5 4.5 5.5 6.5 7.5 8.5 9.5 10.5 11.5.25.0
Total Number
Number Non Smokers
Number Smokers
Cigarette
Other
283
254
29
15
14
416
342
74
48
26
104
50
54
43
11
71
7
64
50
14
81
1
80
72
8
82
0
82
74
8
57
0
57
47
10
41
1
40
37
3
25
0
25
24
1
18
0
18
17
1
8
0
8
5
3
9
0
9
6
3
Table B-16.
SEATTLE
CARBOXYHEMOGLOBIN FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION
% COHb
0.5 1.5 2.5 3-5 4.5 5.5 6.5 7.5 8.5 9.5 10.5 11.5 25.0
Total Number
Vl^rnha-ir JIrj»» SlTcUsrO
Number Smokers
Cigarette
Other
277
-------
Table B-17.
VERMONT-NEW HAMPSHIRE
CARBOXYHEMOGLOBIN FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION
% COHb
0.5 1.5 ?..5 3.5 4.5 5.5 6.5 7.5 8.5 9.5 10.5 11.5 25.0
Total Number
Number Non Smokers
Number Smokers
Cigarette
Other
866
787
79
38
*1
209
137
72
43
29
74
10
64
54
10
89
8
81
69
12
64
7
57
<*7
10
78
2
76
67
9
57
1
56
49
7
46
1
45
42
3
18
1
17
15
2
11
0
11
10
1
5
0
5
2
3
3
0
3
3
0
Table B-18.
WASHINGTON, B.C.
CARBOXYHEMOGLOBIN FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION
% COHb °°5 1-5 2.5 3.5 4.5 5.5 6.5 7.5 8.5 9.5 10.5 11.5 25.0
Total Number
Number Non Smokers
Number Smokers
Cigarette
Other
637
545
92
48
44
324
238
86
50
36
112
46
66
50
16
105
8
97
83
14
103
1
102
86
16
100
4
96
91
5
58
0
58
50
8
46
0
46
42
4
24
0
24
16
8
8
0
8
5
3
2
0
2
1
1
11
1
10
4
6
B-9
-------
APPENDIX C.
Table C-l» ,
ANCHORAGE
INFLUENCE OF RACE AND SMOKING ON COHB
Totals
Hem Smoker
Smoker
WHITE BLACK OTHER
246 5 118
N
X0
SD
SEM
N
X.
SD
sac
104
1.92
1.16
0.11
79
5.98
2.69
0.3A
1
1.00
0.0
0.0
2
4.15
0.64
0.45
48
1.75
1.98
0.29
66
3.12
1.69
0.21
Table C-2.
CHICAGO
INFLUENCE OF RACE AND SMOKING ON COHB
WHITE BLACK OTHER
TOTAL NUMBER 709 192 14
N
Non Smoker X.
SD
SEM
N
Smoker X.
SD
SEM
359
2.00
1.05
0.06
281
5.62
2.42
0.14
39
2.38
1.46
0.23
143
6.14
2.39
0.20
4
2.22
0.85
0.43
9
6.26
2.05
0.68
C-l
-------
Table C-3.
DENVER
INFLUENCE OF RACE AND SMOKING ON COHB
WHITE BLACK OTHER
TOTAL NUMBER 1504 70 289
N
Non Smoker X.
SD
SEM
N
Smoker X.
SD
SEM
634
2.04
0.97
0.04
687
5.97
2.33
0.09
20
2.43
1.45
0.32
42
5.31
2.21
0.34
90
2.39
0.95
0.10
178
4.61
2.16
0.16
Table C-4.
DETROIT
INFLUENCE OF RACE AND SMOKING ON COHB
WHITE
BLACK
OTHER
N
Non Smoker X.
SD
SEM
N
Smoker X.
SD
SEM
1132
1.56
0.86
0.03
683
5.99
2.44
0.09
38
1.84
0.91
0.15
37
5.87
2.66
0.44
4
1.47
0.47
0.24
2
3.70
3.25
2.30
C-2
-------
Table C-5.
HONOLULU
INFLUENCE OF RACE AND SMOKING ON COHB
WHITE BLACK OTHER
TOTAL NUMBER 449 10 704
N
Kon Ssseik©}? I,
SD
SEM
S3
Smoker I0
SB
$m
193
1.52
0.70
0.05
183
5o50
2AB
©as
4
2.05
1,23
0.61
6
5o02
20&2
0.99
311
1.56
0.78
0.04
331
4.97
2.10
0,12
Table C-6.
HOUSTON
INFLUENCE OF RACE AND SMOKING ON COHB
WHITE
Totals
OTHER
7
E3
Noa Smoker X.
SB
SEM
N
Smoker X.
SD
SEM
217
1.49
1.37
0.00
11
4.74
2.79
0.84
22
1.40
0.62
0.13
5
3.28
1.87
0.84
3
1.03
0.23
0.13
2
2.20
1.56
1.10
C-3
-------
Table C-7.
LOS ANGELES
INFLUENCE OF RACE AND SMOKING ON COHB
WHITE
BLACK
OTHER
N
Non Smoker X.
SD
SEM
N
Smoker X.
SD
SEM
2548
1.99
0.86
0.02
1375
6.36
2.45
0.07
136
2.13
0.66
0.06
143
5.62
2.21
0.19
203
2.03
0.87
0.06
113
4.74
2.30
0.22
Table C-8.
MIAMI
INFLUENCE OF RACE AND SMOKING ON COHB
WHITE BLACK OTHER
TOTAL NUMBER 1162 353 39
N
Hoi. Ssiioker X.
SD
SEM
N
Smoker X.
SD
SEM
323
1.33
0.89
0.05
504
5.12
2.62
0.12
67
1 -7Q
1.45
0.18
207
5.31
? £6
0.19
10
1 0| A
Jk • t.*-
0.61
0.19
19
4.34
*•• jj
0.58
C-4
-------
Table C-9.
MILWAUKEE
INFLUENCE OF RACE AND SMOKING ON COHB
WHITE
BLACK
OTHER
N
Non Smoker X.
SB
SEM
N
Smoker X»
SB
SEM
1881
1.34
0.90
0.02
1106
4.71
2o50
0.08
805
1.32
0.73
0.03
446
3.90
2o32
Ooll
53
1.28
0.54
0.07
27
3.00
1.62
0.31
Table C-10.
NEW ORLEANS
INFLUENCE OF RACE AND SMOKING ON COHB
WHITE BLACK OTHER
TOTAL NUMBER 182 355 5
N
Non Smoker X.
SD
SEM
N
Smoker X.
SD
SEM
(§3
1.74
1.00
0.13
104
5.75
2.16
0.21
95
1.91
0»89
0.09
242
5.41
2.17
0.14
1
1.40
0.0
0.0
2
5.10
2.40
1.70
C-5
-------
Table Oil.
NEW YORK CITY
INFLUENCE OF RACE AND SMOKING ON COHB
WHITE
BLACK
OTHER
TOTAL NUMBER
N
Non Smoker X.
SD
SEM
N
Smoker X.
SD
SEM
2123
1.42
0.74
0.02
1559
4.96
2.42
0.06
125
1.37
0.74
0.07
174
4.54
2.35
0.18
45
1.54
0.71
0.11
53
4.43
2.52
0.35
Table C-12.
PHOENIX
INFLUENCE OF RACE AND SMOKING ON COHB
WHITE BLACK OTHER
TOTAL NUMBER 495 21 104
N
Non Smoker X.
SD
SEM
N
Smoker X.
SD
SEM
110
1.41
1.48
0.14
126
4.57
2.59
0.23
3
0.97
0.31
0.18
6
3.73
1.47
0.60
34
1.55
1.02
0.18
26
3.47
1.80
0.35 |
C-6
-------
Table C-13.
ST. LOUIS
INFLUENCE OF RACE AND SMOKING ON COHB
WHITE BLACK OTHER
TOTAL NUMBER 1158 30 2
N
Non Smoker X.
SD
SEM
N
Smoker X.
SD
SEM
657
1.48
0.64
0.03
331
5.40
2.32
0.13
14
1.27
0.50
0.13
14
5.55
1.92
0.51
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
1
2.40
0.0
0.0
Table C-14.
SALT LAKE CITY
INFLUENCE OF RACE AND SMOKING ON COHB
WHITE BLACK OTHER
TOTAL NUMBER 750 3 26
N
Non Smoker X.
SD
SEM
N
Smoker X.
SD
SEM
528
1.37
0.82
0.04
140
5.44
2.37
0.20
1
0.70
0.0
0.0
2
6.35
0.64
0.45
16
1.44
0.52
0.13
10
3.78
2.28
0.72
C-7
-------
Table C-15.
SAN FRANCISCO
INFLUENCE OF RACE AND SMOKING ON COHB
WHITE
BLACK
OTHER
N
Non Smoker X.
SD
SEM
N
Smoker X.
SD
SEM
613
1.70
0.62
0.03
387
5.49
2.43
0.12
25
1.60
0.55
0.11
29
5.25
2.72
0.51
22
1.68
0.60
0.13
21
3.67
2.20
0.48
Table C-16.
SEATTLE
INFLUENCE OF RACE AND SMOKING ON COHB
WHITE
BLACK
OTHER
N
Non Smoker X.
SD
SEM
N
Smoker X.
SD
SEM
568
1.67
0.78
0.03
352
5.71
2.41
0.13
3
1.60
0.99
0.57
3
4.33
1.31
0.75
14
1.53
0.41
0.11
6
4.38
2.03
0.83
C-8
-------
Table C-17.
VERMONT-NEW HAMPSHIRE
INFLUENCE OF RACE AND SMOKING ON COHB
WHITE BLACK OTHER
TOTAL NUMBER 1524 7 11
N
Non Smoker X.
SD
SEM
N
Smoker X.
SD
SEM
944
1.36
0.70
0.02
437
4,91
2.42
0.12
7
1.09
0.60
0.23
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
8
0.91
0.34
0.12
1
2.90
0.0
0.0
Table C-18.
WASHINGTON, D. C.
INFLUENCE OF RACE AND SMOKING ON COHB
WHITE BLACK OTHER
TOTAL NUMBER 1529 117 12
N
Non Smoker X.
SD
SEM
N
Smoker X.
SD
SEM
789
1.40
0.72
0.03
472
4.88
2.30
0.11
54
1.61
0.55
0.07
47
4.19
1.78
0.26
8
1.25
0.62
0.22
3
3.33
1.42
0.82
C-9
-------
APPENDIX
Table D-l.
ANCHORAGE
WEIGHT (Pounds)
120
130
140
150
160
170
180
190
200
400
Total Number
74
20
28
39
43
32
42
29
22
39
COHb DATA
N
NON X.
SMOKERS S.D.
SEM
N
CIGARETTE X.
SMOKERS S.D.
SEM
38
1.9(
2.1<
0.3f
33
2.93
1.62
0=28
9
1.78
0.44
0.15
9
6.44
2.70
0,90
7
1.67
0.54
0.20
17
3.35
1.99
0.48
7
1.84
0.74
0.28
23
4.01
2.12
0.44
19
1.83
0.46
0.10
17
6.47
3.34
0.81
13
1.22
0.55
0.15
10
5.51
2.62
0.83
19
1.80
0.57
0.13
13
5.47
2.70
0.75
11
2.65
2.68
0.81
8
5.56
2.79
0.99
12
2.14
1.73
0.50
5
5.26
2.88
1.29
17
1.84
0.69
0.17
11
6.35
2.06
0.62
Table D-2.
CHICAGO
WEIGHT (Pounds)
120
130
140
150
160
170
180
190
200
400
Total Number
T4-
JA
99
....93
113
122
175
83
65
91
COHb DATA
N
NON X.
SMOKERS S.D.
SEM
N
CIGARETTE X.
SMOKERS S.D.
SEM
32
1.62
0.51
0.09
17
5.01
2.44
0.59
33
2.06
1.44
0.25
39
5.03
2.11
0.34
52
1.83
0.66
0.09
45
5.62
2.61
0,39
42
2.07
0.93
0.14
48
5.85
2.51"
0.36
48
1.97
0.50
0.07
48
5.55
^ 2.21
0.32
47
2.01
0.95
0.14
63
5.91
2.30
0.29
58
2.14
1.80
0.24
62
6.11
2.21
0.28
33
2.26
1.46
0.25
42
6.37
2.55
0.39
20
2.26
0.70
0.16
35
6.03
2.69
0.46
2.23
0.79
0.12
39
5.87
2.41
0.39
-------
Table D-3.
DENVER
WEIGHT (Pounds)
120
130
140
150
160
170
180
190
200 400
Total Number
83
131
159 :
258
265
285
224
186
121
156
COHb DATA
N
NON X.
SMOKERS ;S.D.
0— — O SEM
N
CIGARETTE X.
SMOKERS S.D.
• * SEM
48
1.82
0.65
0.09
31
5.83
2.68
0.48
68
1.97
0.67
0.08
56.
5.34
2.23
0.30
55
1.94
1.03
0 . 14
92
5.46
2.44
0.25
78
2.11
1.07
0.12
153
5.62
2.35
0.19
97
2.11
0.90
0.09
' 138
5.60
2.14
0.18
108
2.18
i.04
0. 10
146
5.76
2.48
0.21
90
2.13
0.82
0.09
100
5.61
2.24
0.22
74
2.04
6.76
0.09
86
5.93
2.58
0.28
54
2.21
.1.34
0.18
46
5.71
2.48
0.37
73
2.25
1.36
0.16
62
5.85
2.16
0.27
Table D-4.
DETROIT
WEIGHT (Pounds)
120 130
140
150 160
170
180 190
200 400
Total Number
87
125
122
191
248
310
367
315
219
310
COHb DATA
N
NON X.
SMOKERS S.D.
SEM
N
CIGARETTE X.
SMOKERS S.D.
SEM
45
1.18
0.44
0.07
39
5.26
2.30
0.37
73
1.20
0.45
0.05
44
5.16
2.37
0.36
60
1.34
0.76
0.10
54
5.84
2.35
0.32
108
1.45
0.59
0.06
58
6.06
2.31
0.30
133
1.52
0.84
0.07
74
5.99
2.22
0.26
152
1.62
1.09
0.09
92
6.30
2.50
0.26
187
1.67
0.91
0.07
102
6.21
2.86
0.28
152
1.65
0.92
0.08
98
5.72
2.62
0.27
114
1.64
0.94
0.09
63
6.36
2.37
0.30
150
1.77
0.81
0.07
96
6.06
2.21
0.23
D-2
-------
Table D-5.
HONOLULU
WEIGHT (Pounds)
120
130
140
150
160
170
180
190
200
400
Total Number
13
44
117
136
145
171
133
106
102
196
COHb DATA
N
NON X.
SMOKERS S.D.
O O SEM
N
CIGARETTE X.
SMOKERS S.D.
• • yjai
5
1.40
0.37
0.17
7
4.16
2.40
0.91
18
1.28
0.48
0.11
22
5.52
2.14
0.46
48
1.51
1.02
0.15
61
5.35
2.00
0.26
53
1.51
1.06
0.15
71
5o25
2.31
0.27
62
1.54
0.57
0.07
67
4.57
2.16
0.26
79
1.55
0.77
0.09
68
5.64
2.55
0.31
63
1.58
0.71
0.09
52
5.14
2.25
0.31
45
1.46
0.54
0.08
45
4.99
2.13
0.32
38
1.58
0.57
0.09
53
5.55
2.44
0.34
97
1.64
0.73
0.07
74
4.80
2.06
0.24
Table D-6.
HOUSTON
WEIGHT (Pounds)
120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 400
Total Number -
13
30
20
45
5a
69
73
57
32
67
COHb DATA
N
NON X.
SMOKERS S.D.
SEM
N
CIGARETTE X.
SMOKERS S.D.
SEM
6
3.38
5.17
2.11
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
18
1.16
0.42
0.10
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
20
1.36
0 55
0.12
1
8.20
0.0
0.0
21
1 28
0.55
0.12
1
2.20
0.0
0.0
32
1.37
0.81
0.14
1
1.10
0.0
0.0
33
1.33
0.65
0.11
3
2.27
1.91
1.11 .
36
1.46
1.03
0.17
1
6.^0
0.0
0.0
27
1.52
0.85
0.16
3
6.20
1.44
0.83
15
1.31
0.54
0.14
3
4.50
3.25
1.88
34
1.81
2.08
0.36
5
3.12
1.64
0.73
D-3
-------
Table D-7.
LOS ANGELES
WEIGHT (Pounds)
120
130
140
150
160
170
180
190
200 400
Total Number
235
305
370
490
625
748
687
568
398
523
COHb DATA
N
NON X.
SMOKERS S.D.
SEM
N
CIGARETTE X.
SMOKERS S.D.
SEM
148
1.88
0.63
0.05
84
6.01
2.49
0.27
168
1.87
0.64
0.05
130
5.72
2.58
0.22
i»l2
IL.92
0.65
0.04
137
6.19
2.47
0.21
281
2.03
1.22
0.07
181
6.02
2.31
0.17
369
1.96
0.76
0.04
205
6.40.
2.63
0.18
419
2.00
0.78
0.04
255
6.31
2.49
0.16
402
2.02
0.99
0.05
206
6.27
2.51
0.18
326
2.02
0.94
0.05
170
6.08
2.49
0.19
252
2.05
0.78
0.05
102
6.46
2.40
0.24
311
2.05
0.74
0.04
154
6.15
2.08
0.17
Table D-8.
MIAMI
WEIGHT (Pounds)
120 13(0
140
150
160
170
180
190
200 400
Total Number
24
82
111
150
216
254
195
174
134
207
COHb DATA
N
NON X.
SMOKERS S.D.
SEM
N
CIGARETTE X.
SMOKERS S.D.
SEM
10
l.L
0.5'
0.1'
11
5.0<
3.7i
1.1:
25
1.36
• 1.00
0.20
43
5.00
* 2.69
1 0.41
25
1.19
0.69
'- 0.14
60
5.10
2.65
0.34
31
1.37
1.47
0.27
90 .
4.83
2.49
0.26
48
1.24
0.84
0.12
116
5.46
2.80
0.26
= 53
1.44
1.21
0.17
129
S.Ul
2.67
0.24
61
1.65
1.35
0.17
87
5.48
2.95
0.32
46
1.30
0.57
0.08
70
5.32
2.66
0.32
42
1.34
0.62
0.10
50
5.35
1.97
0.28
56
1.46
0.81
0.11
70
4.87
1.19
0.26
D-4
-------
Table D-9.
MILWAUKEE
WEIGHT (Pounds)
0 120 130 140 150 160 170
180
190
200
400
Total Number
734
438 1 466
509
505
449
450
371
269
577
COHb DATA
N
NON X.
SMOKERS S.D.
SEM
N
CIGARETTE X.
SMOKERS S.D.
SEM
480
1.24
0.75
0.03
202
3.99
2.28
0.16
242
1.29
0.89
0.06
166
4.26
2.56
0.20
249
1.28
0.73
0.05
179
4.46
2.61
0.20
281
1.23
0.63
0.04
183
4.49
2.54
0.19
288
1.35
0.89
0.05
182
4.63
2.26
0.17
244
1.39
1.02
0.07
160
4.84
2.50
0.20
248
1.39
0.75
0.05
141
4.88
2.68
0.23
211
1.36
0.66
0.05
121
4.46
2.47
0.22
144
1.34
0.77
0.06
81
4.70
2.43
0.27
332
1.49
1.14
0.06
175
3.98
2.26
0.17
Table D-10.
NEW ORLEANS
WEIGHT (Pounds)
120
130
140
150
160
170
180
190
200
400
Total Number
13 1 17
43
75
76
78
58
51
49
81
COHb DATA
N
NON X.
SMOKERS S.D.
SEM
N
CIGARETTE X.
SMOKERS S.D.
SEM
6
1.57
0.40
0.17
7
5.36
2.36
0.89
7
1.66
0.32
0.12
10
5.07
1.99
0.63
10
1.60
0.44
0.14
30
5.26
2.42
0.44
16
2.24
1.69
0.42
51
5.18
2.27
0.32
25
1.50
0.45
0.09
47
5.67
1.94
0.28
20
1.88
0.52
0.12
55
5.67
2.05
0.28
16
1.79
0.56
0.14
38
6.12
1.85
0.30
20
2.21
1.66
0.37
30
5.71
2.10
0.38
13
1.68
0.50
0.14
28
4.92
2.61
0.49
26
1.91
0.65
0.13
51
5.55
2.26
0.32
D-5
-------
Table D-ll.
NEW YORK CITY
WEIGHT (Pounds)
120
130
140
150
160
170
180
190
200
400
Total Number
340
380
442
478
543
620
571
514
362
567
COHb DATA
N
NON X.
SMOKERS S.D.
SEM
N
CIGARETTE X.
SMOKERS S.D.
SEM
159
1.21
0.52
0.04
147
4.16
2.29
0.19
L8$
1.18
0.86
0.06
165
4.61
2.30
0.18
203
1.35
0.69
0.48
196
4.26
2.42
0.18
>25
1.32
0.65
0.04
L95
4.71
2.44
0.18
>68
1.45
0.70
0.04
JOS
5.16
2.43
0.17
285
1.45
0.72
0.04
227
5.35
2.71
0.18
>74
1.47
0.78
0.05
L86
5.00
2.33
0.17
241
1.48
0.83
0.05
165
5.02
2.23
0.17
170
1.56
0.58
0.05
120
5.20
2.08
0.19
276
1.61
0.78
0.05
183
5.40
2.37
0.18
Table D-12.
PHOENIX
WEIGHT (Pounds)
120
130
140
150
160
170
180
190
200
400
Total Number
14
36
67
84
79
86
85
65
41
60
COHb DATA
N
NON X.
SMOKERS S.D.
SEM
N
CIGARETTE X.
SMOKERS S.D.
SEM
2
1.25
0.21
0.15
4
3.77
3.74
1.87
10
1.16
0.18
0.06
9
4.83
2.70
0.90
16
1.64
0.97
0.24
23
3.90
2.17
0.45
14
1.61
1.31:
0.35
, 22
4.39
3.29
0.70
20
1.58
1.22
0.27
14
5.14
2.75
0.74
16
2.14
3.40
0.85
22
4.46
1.81
0.39
21
1.15
0.62
0.13
24
4.79
2.62
0.53
16
1.28
0.55
0.14
19
4.54
2.35
0.54
16
0.95
0.34
0.08
7
3.54
2.17
0.82
15
1.42
0.59
0.15
13
3.25
1.71
0.48
D-6
-------
Table D-13.
ST. LOUIS
WEIGHT (Pounds)
120
130
140
150
160
170
180
190
200
400
Total Number
72
68
80
116
132
153
138
147
111
176
COHb DATA
N
NON X.
SMOKERS S.D.
SEM
N
CIGARETTE X.
SMOKERS S.D.
SEM
40
1.24
0.29
0.05
30
4.82
2.44
0.45
45
1.34
0.29
0.04
19
4.91
1.99
0.46
47
1.38
0.47
0.07
22
4.71
2.04
0.43
74
1.47
0.36
0.04
35
6.27
2.23
0.38
56
1.67
1.20
0.16
51
5.66
2.24
0.31
95
1.46
0.54
0.06
43
5.88
2.82
0.43
79
1.48
0.38
0.04
35
5.77
2.44
0.41
90
1.57
0.91
0.10
34
5.10
1.99
0.34
48
1.51
0.46
0.07
37
4.81
2.13
0.35
99
1.45
0.61
0.06
40
5.27
2.06
0.33
Table D-14.
SALT LAKE CITY
WEIGHT (Pounds)
120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 -200 400
Total Number ou"
1 3»
71
84
69
105
104
94
87
54
72
COHb DATA
N
NON X.
SMOKERS S.D.
SEM
N
CIGARETTE X.
SMOKERS S.D.
SEM
26
1.34
0.71
0.14
10
6.04
2.99
0.95
52
1.10
0.46
0.06
17
5.42
1.83
0.44
58
1.20
0.48
0.06
14
4.42
2.65
0.71
47
1.46
1.09
0.16
15
5.67
2.74
0.71
75
1.49
0.77
0.09
23
4.81
1.80
0.38
64
1.19
0.47
0.06
21
5.20
2.65
0.58
66
1.63
1.40
0.17
18
5.80
2.51
0.59
62
1.29
0.55
0.07
14
5.70
2.38
0.64
42
1.50
0.70
0.11
10
6.29
2.59
0.82
53
1.52
0.72
0.10
9
4.48
1.70
0.57
D-7
-------
Table D-15.
SAN FRANCISCO
WEIGHT (Pounds)
120
130
140
150
160
170
180
190
200
400
Total Number
90
98
129 1 144
156
180
163
129
98
90
COHb DATA
N
NON X.
SMOKERS S.D.
SEM
N
CIGARETTE X.
SMOKERS S.D.
SEM
52
1.54
0.60
0.08
35
4.47
2.33
0.39
59
1.57
0.92
0.12
36
5.97
2.53
0.42
54
1.59
0.53
0.07
64
5.06
2.33
0.29
70
1.73
0.52
0.06
59
5.36
2.30
0.30
79
1.71
0.52
0.06
50
5.43
2.58
0.37
102
1.86
0.71
0.07
48
5.60
2.99
0.43
89
1.81
0.59
0.06
47
5.59
1.81
0.26
61
1.65
0.54
0.07
38
5.32
2.20
0.36
48
1.61
0.54
0.08
30
5.61
2.31
0.42
45
1.72
0.48
0.07
2?
5.64
3.07
0.57
Table D-16.
SEATTLE
WEIGHT (Pounds)
120
130 140
150
160
170
180
190
200 400
Total Number
59
87
113 1 108
106
144
156
109
110
105
COHb DATA
N
NON X.
SMOKERS S.D.
SEM
N
CIGARETTE X.
SMOKERS S.D.
SEM
36
1.55
0.45
0.08
20
5.25
2.17
0.49
53
1.62
1.53
0.21
28
4.88
2.42
0.46
65
1.55
0.51
0.06
37
5.26
2.56
0.42
56
1.57
0.54
0.07
37
5.64
1.94
0.32
56
1.56
0.62
0.08
38
6.19
2.75
0.45
71
1.66
0.57
0.07
48
5.89
2.54
0.37
76
1.74
0.66
0.08
56
5.80
2.58
0.35
65
1.73
0.85
0.11
27
6.23
2.24
0.43
54
1.79
0.68
0.09
32
5.64
2.35
0.42
52
1.85
0.81
0.11
37 -
5.63
2.05
0.34
D-8
-------
Table D-17.
VERMONT- NEW HAMPSHIRE
120
WEIGHT (Pounds)
130 140 150 160
170
180
190
200
400
Total Number
65
119
162
174
220
205
187
172
96
141
COHb DATA
N
NON X.
SMOKERS S.D.
SEM
N
CIGARETTE X.
SMOKERS S.D.
SEM
41
1.21
0.54
0.08
21
4.50
2.26
0.49
79
1.31
0.60
0.07
34
5.21
2.47
0.42
104
1.24
0.43
0.04
46
5.17
2.66
0.39
116
1.30
0.81
0.08
48
4.61
2.32
0.34
146
1.33
0.73
0.06
59
4.41
2.42
0.32
116
1.31
0.57
0.05
63
4.62
2.46
0.31
108
1.42
0.70
0.07
56
5.05
2.46
0.33
111
1.44
0.65
0.06
44
5.34
2.32
0.35
54
1.62
1.31
0.18
28
5.74
1.82
0.34
83
1.44
0.50
0.06
39
4.81
2.56
0.41
Table D-18.
WASHINGTON, D. C.
120 130 140 150 ' 160 170 180 190
200 400
Total Number
133
L74
139
139
L74
212
218
177 p.22 ^71
COHb DATA
N
NON X.
SMOKERS S.D.
77
0.96
0.40
79
0.99
0.62
59
1.24
1.00
77
1.41
O.SQ
86
1.43
0.6T
106
1.44
0.67
113
1.58
0.6S
95
1.64
0.80
65
1.66
n_62
94
1.62
0.64
D-9
-------
APPENDIX E.
Table E-l.
ANCHORAGE
Height (Inches)
Total Number
0-62
57
63,64
100
65,66
0
67,68
0
69,70
169
71,72
0
72+
45
COHb DATA
NON
SMOKERS
CIGARETTE
SMOKERS
N
X.
S.D.
SEM
N
X.
S.D.
SEM
Total Number
36
1.91
2.24
0.37
40
3.01
2.01
0.32
0-62
9
11
1.74
0.70
0.21
13
3.70
2.31
0.64
63,64
238
16
1.50
0.71
0.18
25
4.76
2.42
0.48
Table E-2.
CHICAGO
Height /In.ches
65,66
0
22
1.80
0.42
0.09
12
5.76
2.73
0.79
67,68
0
24
2.05
1.24
0.25
18
5.73
2.59
0.61
69,70
549
22
2.13
1.98
0.42
22
5.98
2.80
0.60
71,72
0
22
1.70
0.66
0.14
17
5.61
2.63
0.64
72+
131
COHb DATA
NON
SMOKERS
CIGARETTE
SMOKERS
N
X.
S.D.
SEM
N
X.
S.D.
SEM
32
2.02
0.66
0.12
21
4.62
1.92
0.42
49
2.03
1.29
0.18
30
5.65
2.47
0.45
53
2.02
0.86
0.12
47
6.09
2.39
0.35
66
2.02
0.83
0.10
91
5.62
2.46
0.26
69
2.13
1.65
0.20
85
6.20
2.42
0.26
7
2.11
1.19
0.14
107
5.90
2.40
0.23
62
1.87
0.52
0.07
58
5.51
2.35
0.31
E-l
-------
Table E-3.
DENVER
HEIGHT (Inches)
Total Number
0-62
18
63,64
456
65,66
0. •
67,68
0
69,70
1120
71,72
0
72T
263
COHb DATA
N
NON X.
SMOKERS S.D.
SEM
N
CIGARETTE X.
SMOKERS S.D.
SEM
37
2.01
0.70
0.11
39
5.06
2.09
0.34
67
1.96
0.99
0.12
66 ;
5.13
2.55
0.31
121
1.91
0;66
0.06
115
5.27
2.41'
0.22
Table E-4.
DETROIT
127
2.24
1.16
0.10
162
5.65
2.44
0.19
147
1.98
0.70
0.06
205
5.64
2.36
0.17
134
2.22
0.99
0.09
200
6.10
2.33
0.17
107
2.27
1.39
0.13
117
5.97
2.00
0.19
HEIGHT (Inches).
Total Number
0-62
13
63,64
463
65,66 67,68
0
0
69,70
1510
71,72
0
72+
309
COHb DATA
N
NON X.
SMOKERS S.D.
SEM
N
CIGARETTE X.
SMOKERS S.D.
SEM
64
1.40
0.58
0.07
.251.-.
5.68
3.16
0.63
79
1.32
0.61
0.07
. 57 . .
5.50
2.07
0.27
,.131
1.49
1.19
0.10
. ... 67.
5.35
2.50
0.31 "
203
1.54
0.73
0.05
140
6.02
2.41'
0.20
268
1.61
0.82
0.05
146
6.13
2.33
0.19
281
1.66
0.86
0.05
181
6.15
2.33
0.17
147
1.65
0.95
0.08
106
6.03
2.76
0.27
E-2
-------
Table E-5.
HONOLULU
HEIGHT (Inches)
Total Number
0-62
7
63,64
387
65,66
0
67,68
0
69,70
654
71,72
0
72^
113
COHb DATA
NON
SMOKERS
CIGARETTE
SMOKERS
N
X.
S.D.
SEM
N
X.
S.D.
SEM
23
1.53
0.65
0.14
25
4.90
2.08
0.42
54
1.34
0.44
0.06
53
5.28
2.63
0.36
101
1.44
0.52
0.05
106
5.08
2.08
0.20
Table E-6.
HOUSTON
121
1.55
0.75
0.07
108
5.14
2.24
0.22
88
1.71
1.08
0.12
95
5.21
2.18
0.22
75
1.46
0.45
0.05
81
5.20
2.37
0.26
45
1.84
1.03
0.15
52
5.16
2.35
0.33
HEIGHT (Inches)
Total Number
0-62
7
63,64
89
65,66
0
67,68
ft
69,70
282
71,72
0
72+
95
COHb DATA
NON
SMOKERS
CIGARETTE
SMOKERS
N
X.
S.D.
SEM
N
X.
S.D.
SEM
10
2.49
4.03
1.27
0
0.00
0.0
0.0
19
1.12
0.43
0.10
1
2.20
0.0
0.0
25
1.28
0.53
0.11
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
48
1.45
0.8"
0.12
2
4.65
5.02
3.55
51
1.24
0.51
0.07
3
3 20
1.25
0.72
46
1.88
1.96
0.20
5
3.28
2.67
1.20
43
1.41
0.66
0.10
6
5.13
2.67
1.09
E-3
-------
Table E-7.
LOS ANGELES
HEIGHT (Inches)
Total Number
0-62
230
63,64
362
65,66
579
67,68
884
69,70
1067
71,72
1148
72
667
COHb DATA
N
NON X.
SMOKERS S.D.
SEM
N
CIGARETTE X.
SMOKERS S.D.
SEM
141
1.99
0.60
0.05
86
6.08
2.23
0.24
216
2.01
0.68
0.05
138
5.92
2.74
0.23
360
1.97
0.81
0.04
189
6.12
2.57
0.19
Table E-8.
MIAMI
515
1.99
0.96
0.04
313
6.05
2.38
0.13
614
2.00
0.85
0.03
325
6.33
2.50
0.14
652
1.95
0.83
0.03
373
6.48
2.43
0.13
385
2.07
0.94
0.05
204
5.85
2.32
0.16
HEIGHT (Inches)-
Total Number
0-62
46
63,64
77
65,66 67,68
147
281
69,70
354
71,72
392
72+
237
COHb DATA
N
NON X.
SMOKERS S.D.
SEM
N
CIGARETTE X.
SMOKERS S.D.
SEM
16
0.89
0.39
0.10
22
4.72
3.26
0.70
25
1.17
0.57
0.12
33
4.16
2.25
0.39
40
1.34
1.14
0.18
78
5.29
2.67
0.30
65
1.31
0.86
0.11
136
5.19
2.56
0.22
96
1.56
1.37
0.14
161
5.30
2.79
0.22
99
1.37
0.70
0.07
172
5.16
2.69
0.21
55
1.55
1.09
0.15
117
5.19
2.30
0.21
E-4
-------
Table E-9.
MILWAUKEE
HEIGHT (Inches)
Total Number
0-62
335
63,64
2244
65,66 67,68
0
0
69,70
1808
71,72
0
72
259
COHb DATA
NON
SMOKERS
CIGARETTE
SMOKERS
N
X.
S.D.
SEM
N
X.
S.D.
SEM
577
1.30
0.76
0.03
239
4.11
2o37
0.15
512
1.27
0.72
0.03
295
4.10
2,31
0.13
510
1.27
0.73
0.03
291
4.16
2.52
0.15
Table E-10.
361
1.37
0.73
0.04
280
4.40
2o67
0.16
264
1,49
1.13
0.07
215
5.04
2.42
0.17
269
1.48
1.25
0.08
167
5.01
2.23
0.17
119
1.39
0.81
0.07
100
5.08
2.40
0.24
NEW ORLEANS
HEIGHT (Inches)
0-62
Total Number 4
63,64
110
65S66
0
67,68
0
69,70
336
71,72
0
72+
91
COHb DATA
NON
SMOKERS
CIGARETTE
SMOKERS
N
X.
S.DO
SEM
N
Xo
S.D.
SEM
S
1»76
0.44
0.16
11
4.25
1.90
0.57
16
1.50
0.38
0.10
19
4.94
2.14
0.49
If
2.24
1.56
0.36
38
5.29
2.07
0.34
27
1.64
0,52
0.10
75
5.52
2.32
0.27
39
1.93
1,28
0.21
83
5.71
2.25
0.25
23
1.89
0.47
0.10
62
5.30
2.16
0.27
27
1.81
0.58
0.11
60
5.99
1.87
0.24
E-b
-------
Table E-ll.
NEW YORK CITY
HEIGHT (Inches)
Total Number
0-62
352
63,64
477
65,66 67,68
678
896
69,70
897
71,72
967
72
'557
COHb DATA
NON
SMOKERS
CIGARETTE
SMOKERS
N
X.
S.D.
SEM
N
X.
S.D.
SEM
187
1.26
0.51
0.04
130
4.33
2.45
0.22
238
1.24
0.53
0.03
202
4.36
2.27
0.16
344
1.37
0.79
0.04
263
4.54
2.32
0.14
Table E-12.
PHOENIX
421
1.50
0.84
0.04
350
5.08
2.55
0.14
386
1.44
0.67
0.03
336
5.21
2.46
0.13
465
1.53
0.80
0.04
320
5.05
2.28
0.13
250
1.41
0.71
0.05
192
5.21
2.39
0.17
HEIGHT (Inches)
Total Number
0-62
22
63,64
39
65,66
80
67,68
134
69,70
149
71,72
118
72+
77
COHb DATA
«vn
SMOKERS
CIGARETTE
bnu^Ha
N
•™
A.
S.D.
SEM
N
X.
s.u.
SEM
7
1.11
0.27
0.10
3
5.03
1,76
1.02
11
1.18
0.53
0.16
9
3.60
2.02
0.67
27
1.29
0.50
0.10
19
5.04
2.63
0.60
23
1.43
0.77
0.16
39
4.31
2.60
0.42
34
1.52
1.27
0.22
36
3.74
2.21
0.37
29
1.32
0.65
0.12
28
5.01
2.72
0.51
16
2.02
3.44
0.86
23
4.18
2.43
0.51
E-6
-------
Table E-13,
ST. LOUIS
HEIGHT (inches)
Total Number
0-62
15
63,64
328
65966
0
67,68
0
69,70
674
71,72
0
72
173
COHb DATA
NON
SMOKERS
CIGARETTE
SMOKERS
N
X.
S.D.
SEM
N
X.
S.D.
SEM
50
1.42
0.44
0.06
23
4.64
1.86
0,39
82
1.46
0.93
0.10
25
4.65
2.26
0.45
95
1.47
0.96
0.10
47
5.37
2.93
98
1.45
0.42
0.04
64
5.46
1.99
111
1.48
0.53
0.05
69
5o38
2.16
0,26
151
1.46
0.40
0.03
69
5.92
2.21
0.27
85
1.53
0.64
0.07
48
5.34
2.52
0.36
Table E-14.
SALT LAKE CITY
HEIGHT (inches)
Total Nui
Babeir
0-62
31
63,64
81
65,66
122
67,68
132
69,70
159
71,72
150
72
102
COHb DATA
NON
SMOKERS
CIGARETTE
SMOKERS
N
X.
S.D.
SEM
N
X.
S.Bo
SEM
29
1.39
0.75
0.14
2
5,40
0.14
0.10
60
1.19
0.38
0.05
13
So 74
3,03
0.84
78
1.22
0.60
0.07
35
5.35
2.04
0.35
93
1.30
0.61
0.06
26
So27
2069
0.53
114
1.37
0.77
0.07
28
5o31
2.77
0.52
105
1.54
1.25
0.12
28
5.62
2.25
0.43
64
1.58
0.71
0.09
20
4.83
1.87
0.42
E-7
-------
Table E-15.
SAN FRANCISCO
HEIGHT (inches)
Total Number
0-62
94
63,64
126
65,66
177
67,68
234
69,70
245
71,72
244
72+
160
COHb DATA
N
NON X.
SMOKERS S.D.
SEM
N
CIGARETTE X.
SMOKERS S.D.
SEM
55
1.60
0.95
0.13
33
4.83
2.34
0.41
61
1.63
0.53
0.07
56
4.96
2.71
0.36
100
1.52
0.51
0.05
65
4.90
2.32
0.29
Table E-16.
SEATTLE
118
1.76
0.55
0.05
86
5.73
2.34
0.25
123
1.82
0.59
0.05
71
5.45
2.29
0.27
125
1.78
0.63
0.06
68
5.86
2.66
0.32
79
1.66
0.59
0.06
57
5.50
2.51
0.33
HEIGHT (inches)
Total Number
CCKb DATA
N
NON X.
SMOKERS S.D.
SEM
N
CIGARETTE X.
SMOKERS S.D.
SEM
0-62
12
46
1.47
0.41
0.06
22
5.75
2.03
0.43
63,64
315
60
1.41
0.53
0.07
30
4.76
2.32
0.42
65,66
0
92
1.65
1.19
0.12
50
5.45
2.42
0.34
67,68
0
3e___==ae=<
81
1.77
0.55
0.06
57
5.55
2.44
0.32
69,70
614
114
1.75
0.69
0.06
77
5.57
2.24
0.26
71,72
0
105
1.76
0.79
0.08
74
6.48
2.52
0.29
72+
158
87
1.63
0.72
0.08
51
5.51
2.43
0.34
E-8
-------
Table E-17.
VERMONT - NEW HAMPSHIRE
HEIGHT (inches)
Total Number
0-62
92
63,64
130
65,66
199
67,68
265
69,70
281
71 , 72
341
72T
224
COHb DATA
NON
SMOKERS
CIGARETTE
SMOKERS
N
X.
S.D.
SEM
N
X.
S.D.
SEM
62
1.19
0.30
0.04
29
4.82
2.26
0.42
87
1.37
0.92
0.10
39
5.01
2.31
0.37
121
1.41
0.93
0.08
70
5.10
2.81
0.34
Table E-18.
WASHINGTON
150
1.41
0.76
0.06
85
4.89
2.39
0,26
B.C.
175
1.35
0.63
0.05
76
4.70
2.46
0.28
207
1.36
0.63
0.04
88
4.85
2.35
0.25
150
1.30
0.57
0.05
48
5.13
2.08
0.30
HEIGHT (inches)
Total Number
0-62
27
63,64
476
65,66
0
67,68
0
69S70
942
71 , 72
0
72+
219
COHb DATA
NON
SMOKERS
CIGARETTE
SMOKERS
N
X.
S.D.
SEM
N
X.
S.D.
SEM
63
1.08
0.73
0.09
19
4.46
2.80
0.64
96
1.09
0.50
0.05
64
4.29
2.37
0.30
118
1.23
0.76
0.07
74
4.01
2.40
0.28
140
1.40
0.60
0.05
98
4.28
2.45
0.25
152
1.57
0.68
0.06
92
5.18
2.01
0.21
174
1.60
0.76
0.06
116
5.47
1.85
0.17
110
1.59
0.67
0.06
63
5.34
2.06
0.26
E-9
-------
APPENDIX F.
Table F-l.
ANCHORAGE
INFLUENCE OF RACE AND SEX ON COHb
WHITE
NON WHITE
N
Hale X,
SD
SEM
N
Female X.
SD
SEM
81
1.98
1.28
0.14
22
1,78
0.55
0,12
17
2.02
2.39
0.58
32
1,57
1.71
0o30
Table F-2,
CHICAGO
INFLUENCE OF RACE AND SEX ON COHb
WHITE
NON WHITE
N
Male X.
SD
SEM
N
Female X.
SD
SIM
237
2.02
1.06
0.07
121
1.95
1.05
0.10
37
2»39
1.50
0.25
6
2.22
0.72
0.29
F-l
-------
Table F-3.
DENVER
INFLUENCE OF RACE AND SEX ON COHb
WHITE
NON WHITE
N
Male X.
SD
SEM
N
Female X.
SD
SEM
446
2.15
1.05
0.05
188
1.80
0.67
0.05
85
2.49
1.09
0.12
25
2.07
0.87
0.17
Table F-4. '
DETROIT
INFLUENCE OF RACE AND SEX ON COHb
WHITE
NON WHITE
N
Male X.
SD
SEM
N
Female X.
SD
SEM
893
1.63
0.83
0.03
237
1.30
0.93
0.06
35
1.90
0.92
0.16
7
1.34
0.53
0.20
F-2
-------
Table F-5.
HONOLULU
INFLUENCE OF RACE AND SEX ON COHb
WHITE
NON WHITE
N
Male X.
SD
SEM
N
Female X.
SD
SEM
163
1.54
0.72
0.06
26
1.29
0.46
0.09
296
1.55
0.73
0.04
18
1.76
1.50
0.35
Table F-6.
HOUSTON
INFLUENCE OF RACE AND SEX ON COHb
WHITE
NON WHITE
N
Male X.
SD
SEM
N
Female X.
SD
SEM
159
1.50
1.22
0.10
56
1.51
1.77
0.24
21
1.39
0.64
0.14
4
1.17
0.22
0.11
F-3
-------
Table F-7.
LOS ANGELES
INFLUENCE OF RACE AND SEX ON COHb
WHITE
NON WHITE
N
Male X.
SD
SEM
N
Female X.
SD
SEM
1948
2.00
0.90
0.02
600
1.94
0.70
0.03
275
2.09
0.83
0.50
63
1.96
0.64
0.08
Table F-8.
MIAMI
INFLUENCE OF RACE AND SEX ON COHb
WHITE
NON WHITE
N
Male X.
SD
SEM
N
Female X.
SD
SEM
— ^— — — — — — — .= - • ^^^j
253
1.40
0.96
0.06
68
1.04
0.48
0.06
68
1.66
1.30
0.16
9
2.08
1.95
0.65
F-4
-------
Table F-9,
MILWAUKEE
INFLUENCE OF RACE AND SEX ON COHb
WHITE
NON WHITE
N
Male X.
SD
SEM
N
Female X.
SD
SM
814
1,45
1.03
0.04
1052
1.25
0,02
163
1,40
0.87
0,07
691
1,30
0,03
Table F-10.
NEW ORLEANS
INFLUENCE OF RACE AND SEX ON COHb
WHITE
KCS3 HHITS
N
Male X.
SB
SEM
N
Female X.
SD
i»
49
1.73
1.10
0.16
14
1.77
0o49
0.13
86
1.95
0.91
0.10
10
1.52
Oo4S
Ool5
F-5
-------
Table F-ll. '
NEW YORK
INFLUENCE OF RACE AND SEX ON COHb
WHITE
NON WHITE
N
Male X.
SD
SEM
N
Female X.
SD
SEM
1457
1.49
0.77
0.02
665
1.26
0.63
0.02
85
1.52
0.66
0.07
84
1.31
0.80
0.09
Table F-12.
PHOENIX
INFLUENCE OF RACE AND SEX ON COHb
WHITE
NON WHITE
N
Male X.
SD
SEM
N
Female X.
SD
SEM
77
1.48
1.74
0.20
33
1.26
0.40
0.07
32
1.59
1.03
0.18
5
0.98
0.55
0.24
F-6
-------
Table F-13.
ST. LOUIS
INFLUENCE OF RACE AND SEX ON COHb
WHITE
NON WHITE
N
Male X,
SD
SEM
N
Female X.
SD
SEM
439
1.52
0.64
0.03
218
Io39
0.64
0.04
11
1.28
0.52
0,16
3
1,23
0.55
Oo32
Table F-14,
SALT LAKE CITY
INFLUENCE OF RACE AND SEX ON COHb
WHITE
NON WHITE
N
Male X.
SD
SEM
N
Female X.
SD
§m
350
Ic46
0.93
0.05
177
1.21
0.52
0,04
10
1.38
0.51
0.16
7
1.43
0.61
0.23
F-7
-------
Table F-15.
SAN FRANCISCO
INFLUENCE OF RACE AND SEX ON COHb
WHITE
NON WHITE
N
Male X.
SD
SEM
N
Female X.
SD
SEM
411
1.78
0.59
0.03
202
1.55
0.65
0.05
29
1.73
0.58
0.11
18
1.49
0.53
0.13
Table F-16.
SEATTLE
INFLUENCE OF RACE AND SEX ON COHb
WHITE
NON WHITE
N
Male X.
SD
SEM
N
Female X.
SD
SEM
345
1.75
0.72
0.04
223
1.55
0.85
0.06
12
1.54
0.61
0.18
5
1.54
0.11
0.05
F-8
-------
Table F-17.
VERMONT - NEW HAMPSHIRE
INFLUENCE OF RACE AND SEX ON coHb
WHITE
NON WHITE
N
Male X.
SD
SEM
N
Female X.
SD
SEM
655
1.38
0.69
0.03
289
1.32
0.74
0.04
14
0.90
0.31
0.08
1
2.30
0.0
0.0
Table F-18.
WASHINGTON D. C.
INFLUENCE OF RACE AND SEX ON COHb
WHITE
NON WHITE
N
Male X.
SD
SEM
N
Female X.
SD
SEM
503
1.59
0.69
0.03
285
1.06
0.63
0.04
39
1.69
0.56
0.90
23
1.34
0.50
0.11
F-9
-------
APPENDIX G.
Table G-l.
ANCHORAGE
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE
29.35 29.45
Total Number (64 ( 14 I
29.55 29.65 29.75 29.85 29.95 30.05
56
I 21 I 115 | 17 I 20 | 27 | 37
COHb DATA
N
NON X.
SMOKERS S.D.
SEM
N
CIGARETTE X.
SMOKERS S.D.
SEM
28
1.71
0.64
0.12
32
3.39
1.52
0.26
3
2.10
0.17
0.10
9
6.64
2.64
0.88
36
2.07
2.22
0.37
15
5.34
2.16
0.56
2
3.20
0.0
0.0
3
5.37
4.00
2.31
45
1.87
1.45
0.22
54
3.97
2.48
0.34
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
14
1.75
1.60
0.43
14
5.79
3.32
0.89
9
1.48
0.51
0.17
7
7.39
3.70
1.39
16
1.76
0.52
0.13
13
5.77
1.79
0.50
Table G-2.
CHICAGO
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE
2S.75
29.85
30.15
8
Total Number
3? S 'ASH
COHb DATA ]
N
NON X.
SMOKERS S.D.
SEM
N
CIGARETTE X.
SMOKERS S.D.
SEM
6
1.92
0.56
0.23
31
5.19
2.77
0.50
85
1.59
0.40
0.04
60
4.27
2.28
©029
31
10
2.52
0.38
0.12
37
6.08
2.17
Oo36
485
.210
2.16
1.30
0.09
231
6.19
2.28
0,15
113
46
2.40
0.66
0.10
58
6.09
2.28
0.30
64
41
1.81
1.21
0.19
16
4.59
2.51
0.63
6-1
-------
Table G-3.
DENVER
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE
29.55 29.65 29.75 29.85 29.95 30.05 30.15
Total Number
207
COHb DATA
N
NON X.
SMOKERS S.D.
SEM
N
CIGARETTE X.
SMOKERS S.D.
SEM
71
2.16
1.22
0.15
102
5.12
2.31
0.23
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0
0.0
0.0
0,0
1
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
I
2.90
0.0
0.0
347
143
1.98
0.96
0.08
175
5.91
2.52
0.19
276
117
1.95
0.60
0.06
127
6.13
2.33
0.21
738
272
2.14
1.13
0.07
322
5.64
2.27
0.13
75
56
2.15
0.95
0.13
77
5.66
2.37
0.27
223
85
2.24
0.79
0.09
108
5.39
2.28
0.22
Table G-4.
DETROIT
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE
29.75
29.85
29.95
30.05
30.15
Total N«j™bsr
n
~
COHb DATA
N
NON X.
SMOKERS S D
0 0 SEM
N
CIGARETTE X.
SMOKERS S.D.
• • SEM
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
632
236
1.67
0.80
0.05
121
6.00
2.39
0.22
220
98
1.32
0.34
0.03
77
6.15
2.16
0.25
739
391
1.50
0.01
0.05
251
5.81
2.62
0.17
228
112
1.72
0.56
0.05
70
6.26
2.29
0.27
578
291
1.47
0.62
0.04
166
5.83
2.49
0.19
G-2
-------
Table G-5.
HONOLULU
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE
29.75
29.85
29.95
30.05
30.15
Total Number
0
COHb DATA
N
NON X.
SMOKERS S.D.
SEM
N
CIGARETTE X.
SMOKERS S.D.
SEM
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
96
40
1.44
0.52
0.08
40
5.28
2.09
0.33
413
102
1.56
0.74
0.07
93
5.28
2.21
0.23
654
365
1.55
0.78
0.04
388
5.11
2.28
0.12
1
1
1.40
0.0
0.0
Q
0.0
0.0
0.0
Table G-6.
HOUSTON
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE
COHb DATA
29.75
29.83
29.51
30.05
30.15
Total Number
4
37
20
1 89
211 1 52
N
NON X.
SMOKERS S.D.
SEM
N
CIGARETTE X.
SMOKERS S.D.
SEM
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
17
0.82
0.28
0.07
1
0.70
0.0
0.0
8
2.32
1.60
0.57
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
44
1.62
2.64
0.40
3
2.57
1.68
0.^7
108
1.46
0.76
0.07
10
4.02
2.68
0.85
28
1.44
0.61
0.12
2
6.65
1.06
0.75
G-3
-------
Table G-7.
LOS ANGELES
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE
29.75
29.85
29.95
30.05
30.15
Total Number
0
COHb DATA
N
NON X.
SMOKERS S.D.
SEM
N
CIGARETTE X.
SMOKERS S.D.
SEM
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
658
332
2.22
0.75
0.04
257
6.37
2.36
0.15
1942
1161
1.94
0.73
0.02
596
6.39
2.48
0.10
1119
588
1.66
0.92
0.04
365
5.67
2.37
0.12
491
376
2.43
0.76
0.04
165
6.60
2.48
0.19
626
358
2.13
1.07
0.06
207
5.98
2.48
0.17
Table G-8.
MIAMI
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE
29.75
29.85
29.95
30.05
30.15
Total Number
0
^ ,O»^« «•>, A f*^ *
ovmu umtt.
N
NON X.
SMOKERS S.D.
SEM
N
CIGARETTE X.
SMOKERS S.D.
SEM
0
0.0
0.0
o.o
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
.
58
12
1.17
0.53
0.15
32
5.73
3.24
0.57
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
107
29
2.31
1.56
0.29
52
6.26
2.98
0.41
503
j
101
1.35
1.10
0.11
233
4.68
2.28
0.15
800
1
228
1.32
0.90
0.06
374
5.27
2.69
0.14
G-4
-------
Table G-9.
MILWAUKEE
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE
29.35 29.45 29.55 29.65 29.75 29.85 29.95 30.05
Total Number
.1916
COHb DATA
N
NON X.
SMOKERS S.D.
SEM
N
CIGARETTE X.
SMOKERS S.D.
SEM
1101
1.29
0.84
0.03
616
3.94
2.2
0.09
717
441
1.38
0.74
0.04
236
4.29
2.39
0.16
372
219
1.44
0.95
0.06
124
3.82
2.22
0.20
448
261
1.29
0.71
0.04
137
4.33
2.26
0.19
176
102
1.16
0.69
0.07
47
5.71
2.76
0.40
29
10
0.79
0.37
0.12
11
2.78
2.22
0.67
318
166
1.65
1.28
0.10
114
5.97
2.62
0.25
336
186
1.34
0.94
0.07
118
5.19
2.47
0.23
530
274
1.28
0.67
0.04
189
5.08
2.48
0.18
Table G-10.
NEW ORLEANS
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE
29.55
29.65
29.75
29.85
29.95
30.05
Total Number
27
COHb DATA
N
NON X.
SMOKERS S.D.
SEM
N
CIGARETTE X.
SMOKERS S.D.
SEM
11
1.75
0.65
0.20
13
5.96
1.86
0.52
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
120
28
1.65
0.51
0.10
88
5.27
1.94
0.21
247
66
1.86
1.05
0.13
131
5.57
2.27
0.20
71
32
1.98
1.23
0.22
65
5.66
2.28
0.28
68
21
1.86
0.53
0.12
43
5.45
2.40
0.37
30.15
G-5
-------
Table G-ll. ,
NEW YORK CITY
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE
29.55 29.65 29.75 29.85 29.95 30.05 30.15
Total Number
187
COHb DATA
N
NON X.
SMOKERS S.D.
SEM
N
CIGARETTE X.
SMOKERS S.D.
SEM
82
1.34
0.51
0.06
85
5.30
2.42
0.26
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
125
76
1.34
0.84
0.10
39
4.08
2.14
0.34
437
183
1.48
0.67
0.05
184
5.39
2.42
0.18
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
1015
412
1.40
0.66
0.03
290
4.60
2.36
0.14
949
585
1.28
0.67
0.03
364
4.23
2.31
0.12
2091
946
1.52
0.81
0.03
822
5.17
2.41
0.08
Table G-12.
PHOENIX
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE
29.75
29.85
29.95
30.05
30.15
Total Number
COHb DATA
N
NON X.
SMOKERS S.D.
SEM
K
CIGARETTE X.
SMOKERS S.D.
SEM
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
(\
0.0
0.0
0.0
125
26
1.41
0.89
0.18
28
3.90
2.18
0.41
'
187
36
1.72
2.34
0.39
50
4.09
2.53
0.36
308
1.32
0.83
0.09
80
4.68
2.52
0.28
0
0
...I
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
BUMBBWM
G-6
-------
Table G-13.
ST. LOUIS
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE
29.55
29.65
29.75
29.85
29.95
30.05 30.15
Total Number
0
COHb DATA
N
NON X.
SMOKERS S.D.
SEM
N
CIGARETTE X.
SMOKERS S.D.
SEM
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
140
71
1.23
0.34
0.04
47
5.50
2.15
0.31
231
135
1.29
0.35
0.03
68
5.72
2.34
0.28
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
166
82
1.62
0.57
0.06
53
5.55
2.43
0.33
552
259
1.63
0.84
0.05
133
5.11
2.17
0.19
0
52
1.24
0.30
0.04
21
5.32
2.58
0.56
97
70
1.46
0.44
0.05
22
5.60
2.86
0.61
Table G-14.
SALT LAKE CITY
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE
29.75
29.85
29.95
30.05
30.15
Total Number
0
COHb DATA
N
NON X.
SMOKERS S.D.
SEM
N
CIGARETTE X.
SMOKERS S.D.
SEM
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
305
240
1.52
0.86
0.06
48
5.23
2.39
0.34
37
27
1.31
0.67
0.13
9
5.37
2.38
0.79
,
437
278
1.26
0.76
0.05
95
5.40
2.40
0.25
G-7
-------
Table G-15.
SAN FRANCISCO
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE
29.75
29.85
29.95
30.05
30.15
Total Number
0
COHb DATA
N
NON X.
SMOKERS S.D.
SEM
N
CIGARETTE X.
SMOKERS S.D.
SEM
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
207
105
1.81
0.63
0.06
68
5.31
2.46
0.30
680
371
1.72
0.53
0.03
240
5.46
2.44
0.16
367
178
1.59
0.74
0.06
116
5.22
2.56
0.24
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Table G-16.
SEATTLE
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE
29.75
29.85
29.95
30.05
30.15
Total Number
0
COHb DATA
N
NON X.
SMOKERS S.D.
SEM
N
CIGARETTE X.
SMOKERS S.D.
SEM
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
236
116
1.58
0.64
0.06
89
5.53
2.57
0.27
697
377
1.75
0.78
0.04
211
5.61
2.24
0.15
143
81
1.46
0.89
0.10
59
6.13
2.70
0.35
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
G-8
-------
Table G-17.
VERMONT - NEW HAMPSHIRE
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE
29.35 29.45 29.55 29.65 29.75 29.85 29.95 30.05
Total Number
82
COHb DATA
N
NON X.
SMOKERS S.D.
SEM
N
CIGARETTE X.
SMOKERS S.D.
SEM
44
1.78
1.37
0.21
30
5.51
2.35
0.43
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
280
210
1.29
0.52
0.04
52
4.78
2.32
0.32
104
59
1.65
1.13
0.15
34
5.23
2.31
0.40
53
28
1.75
0.59
0.11
19
6.70
2.97
0.68
481
316
1.20
0.50
0.03
117
3.69
2.22
0.21
542
302 .
1.41
0.69
0.04
186
5.40
2.24
0.17
Table G-18.
WASHINGTON D. C.
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE
29.75
29.85
29.95
30.05
30.15
Total Number
0
COHb DATA
N
NON X.
SMOKERS S.D.
SEM
N
CIGARETTE X.
SMOKERS S.D.
SEM
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
58
27
1.19
0.27
0.05
26
4.31
2.37
0.47
400
206
1.58
0.80
0.06
129
5.51
2.39
0.21
146
75
1.69
0.75
0.09
51
5.07
2.26
0.32
992
505
1.32
0.67
0.03
304
4.46
2.16
0.12
G-9
-------
APPENDIX H.
Table H-l.
ANCHORAGE
TIME OF BLOOD SAMPLE (HOUR)
9 9+-10 10+-11 11+-12 12+-1 1+-2 2+-3 3+-4 4+5
5 +
Total Number [ 25
49
81 | 82
47
43
22
10
12 1 0
COHb DATA
N
NON X.
SMOKERS S.D.
SEM
N
CIGARETTE X.
SMOKERS S.D.
SEM
7
1.60
0.60
0.23
5
3.3"
2.00
0.89
19
1.60
0.72
0.17
21
3.61
3.25
0.71
22
1.89
0.56
0.12
52
4.30
2.48
0.34
42
1.36
0.66
0.1"
30
4.41
2.04
0.37
28
2.11
1.71
0.32
0
5.64
1.60
0.54
22
2.05
2.06
0.44
17
5.61
2.57
0.62
5
5.08
3.65
1.63
8
7.07
2.52
0.80
4
1.57
0.54
0.27
1
11.10
0.0
0.0
4
1.62
0.17
0.09
4
6.20
4.01
2.00
0
0.0
0.0
Q.O
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
•u
c
0)
u
M
-------
Table H-2.
CHICAGO
TIME OF BLOOD SAMPLE (HOUR)
6-9 9+-10
11+-12 12+-1 1+-2 2+-3 3+-4 4+-5 5+-7
Total Number
.2JL
-ZL
149 I 133 I 136 I
156
-1P_L
JUL.
COHb DATA
N
NON X.
SMOKERS S.D.
SEM
N
CIGARETTE X.
SMOKERS S . D.
SEM
10
1.71
0.35
0.11
13
5.05
2.46
0.68
32
1.87
0.51
0.09
33
5.28
2.47
0.43
58
2.33
1.95
0.26
79
5.57
2.30
0.26
66
2.25
1.32
0.16
53
6.02
2.37
0.33
64
1.97
0.67
0.08
66
6.39
2.54
0.31
72
1.91
0.73
0.09
70
5.. 53
2.56
0.31
46
1.75
0.55
0.08
50
5.83
2.37
0.34
30
2.05
0.77
0.14
45
5.81
2.19
0.33
23
2.24
1.19
0.25
25
6.20
2.31
0.46
4
2.25
0.62
0.31
3
5.23
2.73
1.58
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
1
4.00
0.0
0.0
g
u
H
0)
(X
8
•o
6+ 9+ 10+ 11+ 12+ 1+ 2+
9 10 11 12 1 23
TIME OF BLOOD SAMPLE (HOUR)
4+
5
H-2
-------
Table H-3.
DENVER
TIME OF BLOOD SAMPLE (HOUR)
6-9 9+-10 10+-11 11+-12 12+-1 1+-2 2+-3 3+-4 4+-5 5+-7 7+
Total Number 325
233
228
195
100
199
186
154
114 66 34
COHb DATA
N 157
NON X. 2.08
SMOKERS S.D. 1.19
SEM 0.10
N 131
CIGARETTE X. 5.1
SMOKERS S.D. 2..
SEM 0..
^ 8
4J
g
U
M 7
. .1 |
• •
58
2.25
1.14
0.15
80
5.40
2.21
0.25
. . .
' '•'/
f. . \ .
^ i
'.'.','.
45 28 21
2.11 2.35 1.27
0.69 1.50 0.49
0.10 0.28 0.11
56
6.39
2.71
0.36
1 t • •
• • * '
>«^ ' '
. . ; ,
'. . . ,
'
r~~~^
• 4
32 6
6.16 3.52
2.60 2.12
0.46 0.87
••:.-.
f\:::
\
>
6+ 9+ 10+ 11+ 12+ 1+ 2+ 3+ 4+ 5+ 7+
9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 57
TIME OF BLOOD SAMPLE (HOUR)
H-3
-------
Table H-4.
DETROIT
TIME OF BLOOD SAMPLE (HOUR)
6-9 9+-10 10+-11 11+-12 12+-1 1+-2 2+-3 3+-4 4+-5 5+-7
Total Number
60 | 154
244
206
171
278
298
229 | 136
247
'2l9
COHb DATA
N
NON X.
SMOKERS S.D.
SEM
N
CIGARETTE X.
SMOKERS S.D.
SEM
^ 1
4J
s
CJ
M
0)
(X
v-»
25
1 <
g \
i
t
(
33
1.45
0.41
0.07
3
7
5
*
*
2
L
3
13
6.66
1.78
0.49
•
•<
•
. .
.
74
1.68
0.72
0.08
57
5.65
2.14
0.28
: . .
V
, ^
*""'••*
- t •
• ^-<
- 1
1
136
1.60
0.69
0.06
69
5.58
2.19
0.26
•
. . .
H-
— — <
• • '
114
1.57
0.50
0.05
53
5.82
2.92
0.40
• • • i
• • «
!
82
1.44
0.60
0.07
. .... .
*• * t
. - ..
i t
. t -t i -
'. '. I.;
' ,
•
>_• •• •
. . :
60
5.91
2.48
0.32
•
r^
;
1
. . . ;
: . - .
127
1.70
1.35
0.12
106
6.09
2.41
0.23
:.: :'.
. . .
. . , 7-1
. . . .
....
*"""!""--<
148 111
1.56 1.39
0.75 0.83
0.06 0.08
96 74
5.91 6.14
2.52 2.59
0.26 0.30
^-^
•
•;• •• 1 : : • • ; • [ : | '
. ;
. ... .
»—!-»l.
. ' '
, ,
1
72
1.52
0.87
0.10
48
6.05
2.58
0.37
J 1 . .
>^— es=
•
• •
. . -t i
. 4 i ,
. i . .
ft-*
.....
137 111
1.52 1.61
0.68 0.75
0.06 0.07
73
6.
2.
0.
• •
•
" " f
59
12 6.40
50 2.53
29 0.33
-*•*•»
>
6+ 9+ 10+ 11+ 12+ 1+ 2+ 3+ ' 4+ 5+ 7+
9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 57
TIME OF BLOOD SAMPLE (HOUR)
H-4
-------
Table H-5.
HONOLULU
TIME OF BLOOD SAMPLE (HOUR)
6-9 9+-10 10+-11 11+-12 12+-1 1+-2 2+-3 3+-4 4+-5 5+-7 7+
Total Number
121
85
108
111
129
134
139
106
103
86
« 1
COHb DATA
N
NON X.
SMOKERS S.D.
SEM
N
CIGARETTE X.
SMQKERS S.D.
SEM
56
1.51
0.59
0.08
49
4.40
1.83
0.26
41
1.47
0.50
0.08
31
4.59
1.77
0.32
43
1.43
0.52
0.08
49
5.14
2.69
0.38
50
1.52
0.87
0.12
51
5.00
2.18
0.31
41
1.48
0.43
0.07
69
5.03
2.06
0.25
62
1.57
0.52
0.07
68
5.45
2.33
0.28
66
1.90
1.37
0.17
58
5.25
2.29
0.30
51
1.60
0.70
0.10
48
5.29
2.16
0.31
36
1.39
0.61
0.10
52
5.40
2.52
0.35
37
1.41
0.44
0.07
31
5.86
2.37
0.43
25
1.43
0.61
0.12
15
5.51
2.12
0.55
g
u
M
-------
6 -
Table H-6.
HOUSTON
TIME OF BLOOD SAMPLE (HOUR)
9 9+-10 10+-11 11+-12 12+-1 1+-2 2+-3
3+-4 4+-5 5+-7
Total Number | 26 [22 | 26 | 39 |' 60 j 60 ( 51
51
40
54
COHb DATA
N
NON X.
SMOKERS S.D.
SEM
N
CIGARETTE X.
SMOKERS S.D.
SEM
13
1.27
0.49
0.14
1
4.40
0.0
0.0
16
3.30
4.16
1.04
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
11
1.38
0.49
0,15
1
6.90
0.0
0.0
22
1,32
0.61
0.13
4
3.60
1.90
0.95
20
1.18
0.61
0.11
3
3.13
3.71
2.14
27
1.30
0.52
0.10
2
3.40
1.70
1.20
27
1.25
0.59
0.11
1
6.60
0.0
0.0
24
1.32
0.70
0.14
1
1.70
0.0
0.0
19
1.54
0.69
0.16
1
7.80
0.0
0.0
29
1.67
1.02
0.10
4
3.72
3.12
1.56
25
1.26
0.42
0.0"
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
g
u
g
I
6+ 9+ 10+ n+ 12+ 1+ 2+
9 10 11 12 1 23 4
TIME OF BLOOD SAMPLE (HOUR)
4+ 5+
5 7
H-6
-------
Table H-7.
LOS ANGELES
TIME OF BLOOD SAMPLE (HOUR)
6-9 9+-10 10+-11 11+-12 12+-1 1+-2 2+-3 3+-4 4+-5 5+-7
Total Number I 203 I 365 I 439 I 440 I 448 | 577 | 618 | 546 | 408 | 547 |
367
COHb DATA
N
NON X.
SMOKERS S.D.
SEM
N
CIGARETTE X.
SMOKERS S.D.
SEM
127
1.89
0.77
0.07
53
5.68
2.54
0.35
231
1.98
0.88
0.06
101
5.60
2.17
0.22
274
2.07
0.94
0.06
128
6.09
2.29
0.20
255
2.09
0.89
0.06
135
6.13
2.36
0.20
253
1.92
0.61
0.04
152
6.40
2.46
0.20
354
1.91
0.63
0.03
173
6.41
2.41
0.18
357
2.09
1.20
0.06
210
6.11
2.41
0.17
307
2.11
1.05
0.06
196
5.89
2.53
0.18
250
1.98
0.78
0.05
128
6.32
2.63
0.23
308
1.91
0.57
0.03
197
6.30
2.53
0.18
174
1.92
0.57
0.04
158
6.57
2.54
0.20
percen
:s
M
§
g
s
6+ 9+ 10+ 11+ 12+ 1+ 2+
9 10 11 12 1 2 3
TIME OF BLOOD SAMPLE (HOUR)
4+
5
5
7
H-7
-------
Table H-8.
MIAMI
TIME OF BLOOD SAMPLE (HOUR)
6-9 9+-10 10+-11 11+-12 12+-1 1+-2 2+-3 3+-4 4+-5 5+-7
Total Number
79
139
167
184
179
209 178
192
170
55
COHb DATA
N
NON X.
SMOKERS S.D.
SEM
N
CIGARETTE X.
SMOKERS S.D.
SEM
23
1.57
1.40
0.29
34
4.76
2.26
0.39
36
1.51
1.06
0.18
64
5.27
2.31
0.29
40
1.42
1.06
0.17
75
5.09
2.35
0.27
46
1.50
0.95
0.14
81
5.53
2.38
0.26
49
1.47
1.30
0.19
96
4.91
2.64
0.27
49
1.35
0.99
0.14
115
5.35
2.75
0.26
52
1.22
0.58
0.08
71
4.59
2.83
0.34
51
1.41
1.09
0.15
89
5.38
3.07
0.33
41
1.27
^0.66
0.10
75
5.36
2.52
0.29
13
1.39
1.12
0.31
29
4.51
2.74
0.51
0.0
0.0
~0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
percent
ss
M
§
•J
I
6+ 9+ 10+ 11+ 12+ 1+ 2+
9 10 11 12 1 2 3
TIME OF BLOOD SAMPLE (HOUR)
4+
5
5
7
H-8
-------
Table H-9.
MILWAUKEE
TIME OF BLOOD SAMPLE (HOUR)
6-9 9+-10 10+-11 11+-12 12+-1 1+-2 2+-3 3+-4 4+-5 5+-7 7+
Total Number I 1338 I 1113 I 630 I 297 I 63 I 108 |125 I 121 |204 |274
294
COHb DATA
N
NON X.
SMOKERS S.D.
SEM
N
CIGARETTE X.
SMOKERS S.D.
SEM
804
1.27
0.68
0.02
417
4.03
2.36
0.12
600
1.32
0.83
0.03
395
3.99
2.29
0.12
329
1.31
0.64
0.04
248
4.11
2.14
0.14
162
1.53
0.92
0.07
118
4.35
2.32
0.21
26
1.50
0.74
0.15
28
5.21
2.49
0.47
64
1.38
0.70
0.09
31
5.29
2.18
0.39
66
1.54
1.84
0.23
44
4.69
2.48
0.37
57
1.27
0.99
0.13
47
5.34
3.04
0.44
128
1.45
1.16
0.10
57
5.52
2.85
0.38
148
1.53
1.25
0.10
85
5.74
2.61
0.28
147
1.34
0.72
0.06
103
6.15
2.49
0.25
c
01
o
l-l
HI
a.
8
I
6+
9
9+
10
10+ 11+ 12+ 1+ 2+
11 12 1 23
TIME OF BLOOD SAMPLE (HOUR)
4+
5
5
7
H-9
-------
Table H-10.
NEW ORLEANS
TIME OF BLOOD SAMPLE (HOUR)
6-9 9+-10 10+-11 11+-12 12+-1 1+-2 2+-3 3+-4 4+-5 5+-7 7+
Total Number
60
63
53
66
57
53
49
53
44
38
COHb DATA
N
NON X.
SMOKERS S.D.
SEM
N
CIGARETTE X.
SMOKERS S.D.
SEM
20
1.93
0.59
0.13
32
4.90
1.35
0.24
18
1.98
0.78
0.18
40
5.15
2.48
0.39
11
1.63
0.48
0.14
42
5.22
2.11
0.33
21
1.70
0.64
0.14
41
5.18
2.10
0.33
18
2.01
1.54
0.36
36
6.31
2.05
0.34
23
1.50
0.32
0.07
29
6.11
2.06
0.38
12
2.02
0.90
0.26
33
6.08
2.07
0.36
10
1.85
0.29
0.09
42
5.10
2.46
0.38
15
1.66
0.57
0.15
23
5.13
2.10
0.44
10
2.32
2.20
0.70
25
5.97
2.05
0.41
1
3.00
0.0
0.0
2
8.60
0.28
0.20
g
o
M
§
8
§
6+ 9+
9 10
10+ 11+ 12+ 1+ 2+
11 12 1 23
TIME OF BLOOD SAMPLE (HOUR)
4+
5
5
7
H-10
-------
Table H-ll.
NEW YORK CITY
TIME OF BLOOD SAMPLE (HOUR)
6-9 9+-10 10+-11 11+-12 12+-1 1+-2 2+-3
3+_4
7+
Total Number
222
419
575
498
429
518
510
559
491
382
166
COHb DATA
NON X.
SMOKERS S.D.
sm
N
CIGARETTE X.
SMOKERS S.D.
SEM
100
1.48
Oo47
0.05
87
5.11
2.06
0.22
186
1.52
0.64
0.05
158
4.83
2.32
0.19
257
1.42
0.53
0.03
211
4.87
2.30
0.16
216
1.45
0.81
0.06
212
4.77
2.41
0.17
199
1.49
0.81
0.06
174
4.81
2.14
0.16
244
1.45
0.88
0.06
192
4,84
2.47
0.18
240
1»32
0.64
Oo04
200
5.05
2.45
0.17
291
1.39
0.80
0,05
196
4.71
2.52
0.18
248
1.40
0.64
0.04
183
5.14
2.45
0.18
201
1»38
0.95
0.07
124
4.87
2.75
0.25
79
1.29
0.63
0.07
37
5.27
3.09
0.51
^ 8
4-1
0)
O
£ 7
a,
V V
55
a 6
o
i 5
w
^ 4
0
3
2
I
0
1
- 1
^***>>
....
i
>-• "^
,
.
•
H— — =<
'
. . .
....
i
. . . .
.'.,'.
.
>— *_(
....
: ''.-^
\^^L
>. :
i
6+ 9+ 10+ 11+ 12^ 1+ 2^ 3"^ 4* S^~ 7*
9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 57
TIME OF BLOOD SAMPLE (HOUR)
H-ll
-------
Table H-12.
PHOENIX
TIME OF BLOOD SAMPLE (HOUR)
6-9 9+-10 10+-11 11+-12 12+-1 1+-2 2+-3 3+-4
4+-5 5+-7
Total Number
64
56
82
74
72
72
87
59
21
23
10
COHb DATA
N
NON X.
SMOKERS S.D.
SEM
N
CIGARETTE X.
SMOKERS S.D.
SEM
11
2.55
4.09
1.23
19
4.36
2.14
0.49
12
1.08
0.41
0.12
17
3.57
2.49
0.60
18
1.17
0.50
0.12
26
4.09
2.16
0.42
11
1.38
0.96
0.29
24
4.'17
2.18
0.45
15
1.65
1.25
0.32
17
4.06
2.55
0.62
23
1.37
0.43
0.09
10
5.25
2.73
0.86
33
1.38
0.80
0.14
12
5.27
3.98
1.15
13
1.18
0.54
0.15
15
4.33
2.55
0.66
6
1.90
1.93
0.79
10
4.18
2.16
0.68
5
1.00
0.62
0.28
5
6.34
1.92
0.86
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
3
4.90
2.01
1.16
§
o
M
§
I
8
6+
9
9+
10
10+ 11+ 12+ 1+ 2+
11 12 1 23
TIME OF BLOOD SAMPLE (HOUR)
4+
5
51
7
H-12
-------
Table H-13.
ST. LOUIS
TIME OF BLOOD SAMPLE (HOUR)
6-9 9+-10 10+-11 11+-12 12+-1 1+-2 2+-3 3+-4 4+-5 5+-7 7+
Total Number
57
85
102
119
100
122
119
135
99
144
« 1
COHb DATA
N
NON X.
SMOKERS SoD.
SEM
N
CIGARETTE X.
SMOKERS S.D.,
SEM
24
1.42
0,61
0.12
20
5.69
2.06
0,46
56
1.52
0,42
.0.06
18
5.09
2.12
0.50
57
1.52
0,39
0.05
28
5.61
2.94
0.56
66
1 = 44
0,37
0.05
34
4.97
1.84
0.32
58
1.51
0.54
0.07
27
5.89
1.93
0.37
65
1.45
0.40
0.05
40
6.10
2.50
0.40
68
1.42
0.35
0.04
37
5o01
2.25
0.3?
72
1.38
0,43
0.05
37
5.06
2.59
53
1.42
0.53
0.07
36
4.67
1069
0.43 10.28
92
1.64
Io06
0,11
37
5.91
2o50
_ 0.41
61
1.38
1.07
0.14
32
5.39
2.33
0.41
u
M
0)
o,
s
11 12 1 23
TIME OF BLOOD SAMPLE (HOUR)
H-13
-------
Table H-14.
SALT LAKE CITY
TIME OF BLOOD SAMPLE (HOUR)
6-9 9+-10 10+-11 11+-12 12+-1 1+-2 2+-3 3+-4 4+-5 5+-7
Total Number
11
29
40
48
60
62
94
93
97
167
78
COHb DATA
N
NON X.
SMOKERS S.D.
SEM
N
CIGARETTE X.
SMOKERS S.D.
SEM
4
0.90
0.27
0.14
4
5.25
1.05
0.52
22
1.58
0.76
0.16
3
6.30
1.90
1.10
24
1.50
0.47
0.10
12
4.87
1.95
0.56
35
1.34
0.64
0.11
10
4.00
1.46
0.46
37
1.42
0.57
0.09
18
4.36
1.71
0.40
39
1.41
0.72
0.12
18
5.21
2.97
0.70
58
1.62
1.44
0.19
28
5.29
2.89
0.55
66
1.40
0.87
0.11
20
6.31
1.87
0.42
68
1.25
0.60
0.07
10
5.44
2.92
0.92
131
1.23
0.60
0.05
17
5.01
1.56
0.38
61
1.44
0.89
0.11
12
7.32
2.44
0.70
g
u
1-1
0)
o.
PQ
O
6+
9
9+
10
10+ 11+ 12+ 1+ 2+
11 12 1 23
TIME OF BLOOD SAMPLE (HOUR)
4+
5
5
7
H-14
-------
Table H-15.
SAN FRANCISCO
TIME OF BLOOD SAMPLE (HOUR)
6-9 9+-10 10+-11 11+-12 12+-1 1+-2 2+-3
108 | 126 [
7+
Total Number | 111 | 111"
120
123
108
110
123
147
96
COHb DATA
N
NON X.
SMOKERS S.D.
SEM
N
CIGARETTE X,
SMOKERS SoD.
SEM
59
1.81
0.64
0.08
34
4.86
2.02
0«35
63
1.69
0.53
0.07
39
5.73
1.74
0.28
65
1.61
0.54
0.07
39
4o63
2.28
0.37
62
Io66
0.52
0.07
42
5.14
2.36
0.36
58
1.69
0,65
0.09
34
5.56
2.26
0.39
59
1.76
Oo52
0,07
34
5.17
2.22
0.38
70
1.69
Oo63
00<08
37
6.34
3.05
0.50
&S
3U62
0o 52
0.08
44
5,46
2.53
0.38
55
Io64
0,66
Go 09
56
5.63
2.72
0,36
76
io73
Oo90
0,10
40
5.26
2.55
0.40
47
1.82
0.46
0.07
38
5.40
2.85
0.46
4J
C
(a
u
M
0)
(X
§
6
8
10
1 1 "fr1 -fl 9 - -a <
i. .L i c, £,
11 12 1 2
TIME OF BLOOD SAMPLE 0
H-15
-------
Table H-16.
SEATTLE
TIME OF BLOOD SAMPLE (HOUR)
6-9 9+-10 10+-11 11+-12 12+-1 1+-2 2+-3 3+-4 4+-5 5+-7
Total Number
138
131
103
120
122 108
94
75
23
COHb DATA
N
NON X.
SMOKERS S.D.
SEM
N
CIGARETTE X.
SMOKERS S.D.
SEM
55
1.55
0.52
0.07
25
5.28
2.14
0.43
52
1.58
0.61
0.08
28
5.66
2.38
0.45
65
1.78
0.68
0.09
58
5.26
2.51
0.33
68
1.60
0.47
0.06
40
5.14
2.60
0.41
64
1.79
0.62
0.08
28
5.24
2.87
0.54
65
1.74
0.70
0.09
40
6.09
2.50
0.40
59
1.70
0.82
0.11
49
6.45
2.09
0.30
59
1.57
0.85
0.11
34
5.54
2.63
0.45
40
1.83
1.70
0.27
34
5.82
1.87
0.32
42
1.48
0.56
0.09
22
5.88
1.97
0.42
16
1.66
0.34
0.08
3
7.97
2.00
1.16
8
41
g
o
M
tt)
Q.
§
I
I
6+ 9+ 10+ 11+ 12+ 1+ 2+ 3+ 4+ 5H
9 10 11 12 1 23 4 57
TIME OF BLOOD SAMPLE (HOUR)
H-16
-------
Table H-17.
VERMONT-NEW HAMPSHIRE
TIME OF BLOOD SAMPLE (HOUR)
6-9 9+-10 10+-11 11+-12 12+-1 1+-2 2+-3 3+-4 4+-5 5+-7
7+
Total Number
8
41
57
150
163
172
156
194
187
333
81
COHb DATA
N
NON X.
SMOKERS S.D.
SEM
N
CIGARETTE X.
SMOKERS S.D.
SEM
6
1.28
0.12
0.05
1
2.80
0.0
0.0
32
1.26
0.17
0.03
6
3.70
0.76
0.31
44
1.27
0.67
0.10
11
3.55
1.83
0.55
93
1.45
0.91
0.09
47
5.02
2.25
0.33
108
1.50
0.93
0.09
41
5.14
2.17
0.34
109
1.29
0.35
0.03
49
4.59
2.32
0.33
97
1.38
0.63
0.06
44
4.58
2.53
0.38
126
1.28
O.^*
0.03
47
5.02
2.21
0.32
109
1.45
1.03
0.10
63
4.80
2.72
0.34
192
1.35
0.60
0.04
103
5.53
2.24
0.22
43
1.07
0.68
0.10
26
3.95
3.17
0.62
4
8
§
as
.L._ -•._
6+ 9+ 10+ 11+ 12+ l-l
9 10 11 12 1 2
TIME OF BLOOD SAMPLE
H-17
i_.
5
-------
Table H-18.
WASHINGTON, D. C.
TIME OF BLOOD SAMPLE (HOUR)
6-9 9+-10 10+-11 11+-12 12+-1 1+-2 2+-3
Total Number
COHb DATA
N
NON X.
SMOKERS S.D.
SEM
N
CIGARETTE X.
SMOKERS S.D.
SEM
/•^
4J
g
u
M
0)
a.
v_^
z
M
pa
13 I
123
1 204 _
233
8
1.30
0.42
0.15
i
i
*
8
7
6
5.38
2.24
L.OO
•
63
1.43
0.74
0.09
38
4.82
1.78
0.29
97
1.47
0.60
0.06
72
4.32
1.99
0.24
:
110
1.55
0.70
0.07
86
4.49
2.27
0.24
193
108
1.37
0.76
0.07
63
5.14
2.61
0.33
• - ,
• .- -
185
98
1.34
0.59
0.06
52
5.01
2.01
0.28
* •
'
194
102
1.41
0.77
0.08
60
4.37
2.16
0.28
3+-4
232
120
1.43
0.90
0.08
67
5.01
2.59
0.32
T •
4+-5
| 146
71
1.20
0.47
0.06
39
5.07
2.27
0.36
5+-7
99
55
1.37
0.56
0.08
29
5.24
2.25
0.42
.....
...
....
7+
. 3,7 , 1
20
1.75
0.69
0.15
11
5.43
2.76
0.83
H-18
-------
APPENDIX i.
Table 1-1.
ANCHORAGE
HEMOBLOGIN CONCENTRATION, GM %
WHITE NON WHITE
Hale Female Male Female
Totals
N
Non Smokers X.
SD
SEM
N
Cigarette X.
Smokers SD
SEM
N
Totals X.
SD
SEM
103
14.94
1.28
0.13
69
15.62
1.32
0.16
172
15.21
1.33
0.10
30
13.14
1.39
0.25
16
13.72
1.43
0.36
46
13.35
1.42
0.21
18
13.22
1.16
0.27
36
14.02
1.19
0.20
54
13.75
1.23
0.17
32
12.87
1.24
0.22
32
12.66
1.60
0.28
64
12 76
1.43
0.18
183
14.11
1.58
0.12
153
14.43
1.79
0.15
Table 1-2.
CHICAGO
HEMOGLOBIN CONCENTRATION, GM %
WHITE NON WHITE
Male
Female
Male
Female
Totals
N
Non Smokers X.
SD
SEM
N
Cigarette X.
Smokers SD
SEM
N
Totals X.
SD
SEM
240
15.26
1.04
0.07
206
15.43
1.22
0.09
446
15.34
1.13
0.05
125
13.34
0.86
0.08
73
13.61
0.78
0.09
198
13.44
0.84
0.06
38
14.42
1.43
0.23.
141
14.23
1.51
0.13
6
12.97
0.51
0.21
10
13.22
1.45
0.46
- 179 j IS
409
14.56
1.36
0.07
430
14.68
1.48
0.08
j
14.27 | 13.12 j
1.49 ! 1.17 j
ii '
O.II j CL29 jj
1-1
-------
Table 1-3.
DENVER
HEMOGLOBIN CONCENTRATION, CM %
WHITE NON WHITE
Male Female Male Female
Totals
N
Non Smokers X.
SO
SEM
N
Cigarette X.
Smokers
SEM
N
Totals X.
SD
SEM
469
15.91
1.20
0.06
556
16.07
1.38
0.06
1025
15.99
1.30
0.04
203
13.88
1.06
0.08
136
14.26
0.98
0.08
339
14.03
1.05
0.06
86
15.83
1.27
0.14
194
15.76
1.38
0.10
280
15.78
1.34
0.08
25
13.56
1.22
0.24
28
13.76
1.13
0.21
53
13.66
1.17
0.16
783
15.30
1.50
0.05
914
15.66
1.50
0.05
Table 1-4.
DETROIT
HEMOGLOBIN CONCENTRATION, CM %
WHITE NON WHITE
Male Female Male Female Totals
N
Non Smokers X.
-SD
SEM
N
Cigarette X.
Smokers
SD
SEM
N
Totals X.
SD
SEM
992
14.42
1.47
0.05
558
14.83
1.62
0.07
1550
14.57
1.54
0.04
253
12.69
1.42
0.09
132
13.27
1.36
0=7.?
385
12.89
1.43
0.07
38
14.22
1.24
0.20
34
14.34
2.02
v • J j
72
14.27
1.64
0.19
II
7 1290
13.64 f 14.07
1.26
0.47
5
11.44
1.60
o.;i
12
12.72
1.75
0.50
1 , ...
i.Ol
0.05
729
14.50
1.72
0.06
1-2
-------
Table 1-5.
HONOLULU
HEMOGLOBIN CONCENTRATION, GM %
WHITE NON WHITE
Male Female Male Female
Totals
N
Non Smokers X*
SB
SEM
N
Cigarette X.
Smokers cri
oU
SEM
N
Totals X.
SD
SEM
171
15,48
1.03
0.08
171
15.85
1.69
0.13
342
15.66
1.41
O.OS
28
13.35
0,85
0,16
14
14.09
0.70
0.19
42
13.60
Qo86
0=13
315
15o64
1,25
0.07
321
16.11
1030
0.07
636
15o8§
Io29
0.05
18
13o33
1.15
0027
18
14»41
1.03
0.24
36
13o87
1,21
0.20
532
15.39
1.32
0.06
524
15o91
1,48
0.07
-
Table 1-6.
HOUSTON
HEMOGLOBIN CONCENTRATION, GM %
WHITE NON WHITE
Male
Female
Male
Female
Totals
N
Hon Smokers X.
SD
SEM
N
Cigarette X.
Smokers SD
SEM
. N
Totals X.
SD
SEM
162
12.23
1.72
0.14
10
12.39
1.62
0.51
172
12.24
1.71
0.13
59
10.45
1.22
0.16
1
10.00
0.0
0.0
60
10.44
1.21
0.16
21
11.67
1.5®
0.33
7
12'. 34
0.85
0.32
4
9.00
1.15
O.S7
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
2E ; ik •
h
246
11.70
1.79
0.11
18
12.24
1.40
0.33
1
UoB& ' v.m '':
ii "
1.39 , a. 2,5 :'
G.£<5 ,! &.S>7 \
"
-------
Table 1-7.
LOS ANGELES
HEMOGLOBIN CONCENTRATION, CM %
WHITE NON WHITE
Male Female Male Female
Totals
N
Non Smokers X.
SD
SEM
N
Cigarette X.
Smokers
SEM
N
Totals X.
SD
SEM
1967
14.48
1.28
0.03
1023
14.79
1.35
0.04
2990
14.59
1.31
0.02
602
12.73
1.25
0.05
354
13.21
1.55
0.08
956
12.91
1.39
0.05
283
14.45
1.40
0.08
220
14.50
1.01
0.07
503
14.47
1.25
0.06
64
12.52
1.41
0.18
38
12.91
1.10
0.18
102
12.66
1.31
0.13
2916
14.08
1.49
0.03
1635
14.36
1.51
0.04
Table 1-8.
MIAMI
HEMOGLOBIN CONCENTRATION, GM %
WHITE NON WHITE
Kale Female Male Female
Totals
N
Non Smokers X.
SD
SEM
N
Cigarette X,
Smokers gD
(Picm*
N
Totals X.
SD
SEM
17
14.47
1.53
0.08
456
14o94
1.51
r\ r\-t
873
14.72
1.54
0.05
95
13.36
0.93
0.10
86
13.26
1.78
f\ •« «
w • A >
181
13.31
1.40
0.10
101
13.84
1.95
0.19
235
13.95
1.63
V. J.J.
336
13.91
1.73
0.09
14
12.71
n: 7*
0.20
11
12.05
1.80
0.54
25
12.42
1.33
0.27
627
14.16
1 CO
0.06
788
14.42
1.72
0.06
1-4
-------
Table 1-9.
MILWAUKEE
HEMOGLOBIN CONCENTRATION, GM %
WHITE NON WHITE
Male Female Male Female
Totals
N
Non Smokers X.
SD
SEM
N
Cigarette X.
Smokers gD
SEM
N
Totals X.
SD
SEM
851
14.51
2.10
0.07
542
15.39
1.63
0.07
1393
14.85
1.98
0.05
1125
13,22
1.95
0.06
568
13.67
1.78
0.08
1693
13.37
1.91
0.05
166
13*22
2.60
0.20
159
14.07
2.27
0.18
325
13.63
2.48
0.14
733
12.38
1.86
0.07
317
12.75
1.86
0.10
1050
12.50
1. 87
0.06
2875
13.39
2.17
0.04
1586
14.11
2.06
0.05
Table I -10.
NEW ORLEANS
HEMOGLOBIN CONCENTRATION, GM %
WHITE NON WHITE
Male Female Male Female
Totals
N
Non Smokers X.
SD
SEM
N
Cigarette X.
Smokers
SEM
N
Totals X.
SD
SEM
50
15.36
1.12
0.16
94
15.62
1.19
0.12
144
15.53
1.17
0.98
14
13.29
1.79
0.48
10
13.58
1.65
0.52
86 j 10
j
14<,54 12.66
Io06 | 1012
0.11 i 0.35
225 19
14.78 13olS
1.34 1.29
Oo09 0.30
24 [ 3ii j fcS
13.41 | j,4u72 ' 12USB ,
1.70
0.35
T C
160
14.57
1.37
0.11
348
14.88
1.44
Oo08
1
1
loll • :u2ft ';
0.07 j ©023 II
-------
Table I-11.
NEW YORK CITY
HEMOGLOBIN CONCENTRATION, GM %
WHITE NON WHITE
Male Female Male Female
Totals
N
Non Smokers X.
SD
SEM
N
Cigarette X.
Smokers gD
SEM
N
Totals X.
SD
SEM
1597
14.66
1.82
0.05
1031
14.84
2.18
0.07
2628
14.73
1.97
0.04
741
12.81
1.48
0.05
557
13.18
1.62
0.07
1298
12.97
1.55
0.04
89
13.70
2.82
0.30
147
13.65
3.72
0.31
236
13.67
3.40
0.22
93
12.05
2.28
0.24
82
12.37
2.03
0.22
175
12.20
2.17
0.16
2520
13.99
2.01
0.04
1817
14.12
2.35
0.06
Table 1-12.
PHOENIX
HEMOGLOBIN CONCENTRATION, GM %
WHITE NON WHITE
Kale Female Male Female
Totals
. N
Non Smokers X.
£D
SEM
N
Cigarette X.
Smokers cn
&D
SEM
N
Totals X.
SD
SEM
132
12.67
Io33
0.12
107
12.92
1.30
0.13
239
12.80
1.32
0.09
56
11.24
0,89
0.12
27
11.80
1.27
0.25
83
11.42
1.05
0.12
44
12.33
I.e38
U.2l
36
12.66
1.50
0.25
80
12.48
1.44
0.16
7
11.17
0,65
u.2oi
1
11.90
0.0
0.0
8.0
11.26
0.66
0.23
239
12.23
To 37
0.09
171
12.68
1.39
0.11
1-6
-------
Table 1-13.
ST. LOUIS
HEMOGLOBIN CONCENTRATION, CM %
WHITE NON HHITE
Male Female Male Female
Totals
N
Non Smokers X.
SD
SEM
N
Cigarette X.
Smokers gD
SEM
N
Totals X.
SD
SEM
460
14.83
1.42
0.07
238
15.22
1.26
0.09
698
14.97
Io38
0.05
224
12,99
lolO
0.08
95
13.47
1.08
0.11
319
13.14
loll
0.06
11
14.50
1.39
Oo42
13
14.45
Oo68
0.19
24
14047
1.04
0.21
3
13.20
2.62
1.51
3
12.47
0.80
0.46
6
12.83
1.78
0.73
698
14.23
1.58
0.06
349
14.69
1.43
0.08
Table 1-14.
SALT LAKE CITY
WHITE
Male Female
NON WHITE
Male Female
Totals
N
Non Smokers X.
SD
SEM
N
Cigarette X.
Smokers
SEM
N
Totals X.
SD
SEM
391
15.32
0.99
0.05
99
15.54
0.93
0.09
490
15.37
0.98
0.04
192
13.36
0.96
0.07
42
13.93
0.99
0.15
10
15o96
0.99
0.31
11
15.92
0.75
0.23
7
13.57
1.10
0.42
1
12.30
0.0
0.0
234 •' Zl '• fii.w |
13.47 • O0% * 13.411
600
14.69
1.35
0.06
153
15.10
1.21
0.10
" ii 1 '
0.99 ! Oo®5 TLc.II
•1 H
0.06 J S/13 i ®«3§> i(
t D i)
1-7
-------
Table 1-15.
SAN FRANCISCO
HEMOGLOBIN CONCENTRATION, GM %
WHITE NON WHITE
Male Female Male Female
Totals
N
Non Smokers X.
SD
SEM
N
Cigarette X.
Smokers
SEM
N
Totals X.
SD
SEM
448
14.76
1.59
0.08
246
14.96
1.53
0.10
694
14.83
1.57
0.06
214
13.04
1.38
0.10
158
13.46
1.26
0.10
372
13.22
1.35
0.07
34
14.56
1.61
0.28
32
15.16
1.52
0.27
66
14.85
1.58
0.20
21
13.05
1.06
0.23
19
13.17
0.73
0.17
40
13.11
0.91
0.14
717
14.19
1.72
0.06
455
14.38
1.60
0.08
1 Table 1-16.
SEATTLE
HEMOGLOBIN CONCENTRATION, GM %
WHITE NON WHITE
Male Female Male Female
Totals
•N
Non Smokers X.
SD
SEM
N
Cigarette X.
Smokers gD
IPJUl'l
N
Totals X.
SD
SEM
384
15.44
1.12
0.06
243
15.74
1.49
W. iV
627
15.56
1.29
0.05
241
13.47
0.87
0.06
115
13.92
1.00
u,\jy
356
13.61
0.94
0.05
14
15.07
1~0^
0.28
6
15.90
1.06
W.HJ
20
15.32
1.08
0.24
6
13.90
1 . 0':
0.42
3
13.57
0.35
u.zu
9
13.79
0.85
0.29
645
14.68
\ t t.r\
0.06
367
15.15
1.59
O.Ob
1-8
-------
Table 1-17.
VERMONT - NEW HAMPSHIRE
HEMOGLOBIN CONCENTRATION, GM %
WHITE NON WHITE
Male Female Male Female
Totals
N
Non Smokers X.
SD
SEM
N
Cigarette X.
Smokers cn
Dl/
SEM
N
Totals X.
SD
SEM
662
14.98
1.33
0.05
294
15.17
1.69
0.10
956
15.04
1.45
0.05
293
13.04
1.43
0.08
145
13.45
1.37
0.11
438
13.18
1.42
0.07
Table 1-18
14
14.66
1.16
0.31
1
14.90
0.0
0.0
15
14.67
1.12
0.29
1
10.50
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.0
10.50
0.0
0.0
970
14.39
1.63
0.05
440
14.60
1.78
0.09
WASHINGTON D. C.
HEMOGLOBIN CONCENTRATION, GM %
WHITE NON WHITE
Male Female Male Female
Totals
N
Non Smokers X.
SD
SEM
N
Cigarette X.
Smokers
SD
SEM
N
Totals X.
SD
SEM
545
14.78
1.29
0.06
304
15.16
1.42
0.08
849
14.92
1.35
0.05
338
12.65
1.15
0.06
178
13.29
1.09
0.08
516
12.87
1.17
0.05
42
14.64
1.35
0.21
43
14.19
1.26
0.19
85
14.41
1.32
0.14
27
12.14
1.99
0.38
12
12.32
1.11
952
13.95
1.65
0.05
537
14.40
1.58
,1
0.32
39
12.19
1.75
0.28
0.07
1-9
-------
APPENDIX J.
Table J-l. '
ANCHORAGE
RELATIONSHIP OF HEMOGLOBIN TO COHB
. 0-10 10+-11 11+-12 12+-13 13+-14 14^-15 lS^-16 16+-17 17+
Total taaber j 6
7
18
51
73
84
64
57
11
COHb DATA
N
NON X.
SMOKERS S.D.
SEM
N
CIGAREffI X.
SMOKERS S.D.
SEM
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
4
3.85
3 06
1 53
2
1.40
0.0
0.0
2
4.70
0.0
00
9
1.10
0.49
0.16
4
2.45
0.52
0.26
22
1.97
2.10
0.45
19
2.92
2.27
0.52
36
1.82
1.57
0.26
25
3.65
2.04
0.41
13
1.69
0.73
0.13
39
4.00
2.43
0.30
29
1.84
0.60
0.11
23
5.90
2.45
0.51
19
2.57
2.34
0.54
24
6.74
2.35
0.48
3
1.73
0.68
0.39
7
7.14
2 23
0.84
g
u
M
M
§
7
6
4
1
0
0 10+ II4"
10 11 12
j-i
-------
Table J-2.
CHICAGO
RELATIONSHIP OF HEMOGLOBIN TO COHB
0-10 10+-11 11+-12 12+-13 13+-14 14+-15 15+-16 16+-17
171
Total Number
1
6
24
88
189
226
235
119
35
COHb DATA
N
NON X.
SMOKERS S.D.
SEM
N
CIGARETTE X.
SMOKERS S.D.
SEM
1
1.60
0.00
0.00
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
1
1.40
0.00
0.00
5
7.02
2.96
1.32
9
2.28
1.57
0.52
13
5.33
2.47
0.69
38
1.81
0.63
0.10
46
5.23
2.03
0.30
97
1.95
0.84
0.09
85
5.24
2.32
0.25
96
2.01
0.68
0.07
109
5.81
2.33
0.22
104
2.00
0.95
0.09
105
6.20
2.49
0.24
48
2.01
0.57
0.08
56
6.25
2.53
0.34
12
4.03
4.04
1.17
20
5.85
2.55
0.57
» 8
c
0)
u
PQ
O
(J
8
7
6
5
4
3 -
O •-"-•"-
1
0
\\\ :I!IT;I;••;I• t:• i
0
10
10+ 11+ 12+ 13+ 14+ 15+ 16+
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
HEMOGLOBIN
17+
J-2
-------
0-10
Table J-3.
DENVER
RELATIONSHIP OF HEMOGLOBIN TO COHB
10+-11 11+-12 12+-13 13+-14 14+-15 15+-16 16+-17 17+
Total Number
4
3
16
74
212
377
454
437
286
COHb DATA
N
NON X.
SMOKERS S.D.
SEM
N
CIGARETTE X.
SMOKERS S.D.
* SEM
1
2.50
0.00
0.00
1
5.90
0.00
0.00
2
1.55
0.35
0.25
1
1.20
0.00
0.00
5
2.30
2.57
1.15
10
3.70
2.01
0.64
38
1.57
0.56
0.09
24
4.08
2.35
0.48
98
1.77
0.62
0.06
92
4.87
2.26
0.24
162
2.00
0.96
0.08
176
5.06
1.99
0,15
178
2.03
0.76
0.06
229
5.72
2.36
Ool6
166
2.28
0.95
0.07
219
6.32
2.36
0.16
96
2.55
1.46
0.15
161
6.23
2.30
0.18
u
M
-------
Table J-4.
DETROIT
RELATIONSHIP OF HEMOGLOBIN TO COHB
0-10 10+-11 11+-12 12+-13 13+-14 14+-15 15+-16 16+-17 17+
Total Number
43
44
89
243
451
627
559
207 | 37
COHb DATA
N
NON X.
SMOKERS S.D.
SEM
N
CIGARETTE X.
SMOKERS S.D.
SEM
19
2.02
2.64
0.61
16
6.66
3.77
0.94
27
1.37
0.40
0.08
12
6.12
2.16
0.62
55
1.39
0.39
0.05
16
4.81
2.20
0.55
147
1.31
0.61
0.05
58
5.43
2.74
0.36
252
1.56
0.86
0.05
126
5.32
2.28
0.20
337
1.53
0.66
0.04
188
5.69
2.32
0.17
253
1.70
1.01
0.06
200
6.43
2.36
0.07
81
1.85
0.92
0.10
89
6.49
2.49
0.26
5
1.96
0.65
0.29
18
7.84
1.80
0.42
0)
U
M
(1)
a,
§
g
13 14 15
HEMOGLOBIN
J-4
-------
Table J-5.
HONOLULU
RELATIONSHIP OF HEMOGLOBIN TO COHB
0-10 10+-11 11+-12 12+-13 13+-14 14^-15 15+-16 16+-17 17+
Total Number
2
i
8
32
74 1 221
386
283 157 1
COHb DATA
N
NON X.
SMOKERS S.D.
SEM
N
CIGARETTE X.
SMOKERS S.D.
SEM
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
1
14.90
0.00
0.00
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
1
3.30
0.00
0.00
5
2.52
2.55
1.14
3
4.30
2.00
1.15
23
1.15
0.37
0.08
5
4.64
1.33
0.59
38
1.36
0.57
0.09
29
4.64
2.29
0.43
113
1.47
0.83
0.08
80
4.98
2.37
0.27
177
1.51
0.65
0.05
156
5.08
2.03
0.16
104
1.67
0.57
0.06
156
5.23
2.27
0.18
48
1.82
0.99
0.14
90
5.43
2.29
0.24
J=5
-------
Table J-6.
HOUSTON
RELATIONSHIP OF HEMOGLOBIN TO COHB
0-10 10+-11 11+-12 12-+-13 13+-14 14+-15 15+-16 16+-17 17+
Total Number
37
54
53
59
50
15
2
1
0
COHb DATA.
N
NON X.
SMOKERS S.D.
SEM
N
CIGARETTE X.
SMOKERS S.D.
SEM
32
1.84
0.88
0.16
2
4.40
.3.11
2.20
51
1.30
0.56
0.08
2
6.30
2.6-1
1.90
47
1.62
1.17
0.20
5
2.88
1 93
0.86
52
1 48
0.80
0.12
3
3.40
3.48
2.01
43
1.47
1.85
0.28
5
3.82
2.26
1.01
14
0.96
0.24
0.07
1
7.80
0.0
0.0
2
0.80
0.14
0.10
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
1
1 00
0.0
0.0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
tf 8
S
u
Vi
0)
a.
7
6
5
4
2 ,rr
0 10+ 11+ 12+
10 11 12 13
13+ 14+
14 15
HEMOGLOBIN
15+ 16+ 17+
16 17
0-6
-------
Table J-7.
LOS ANGELES
RELATIONSHIP OF HEMOGLOBIN TO COHB
0-10 10+-11 11+-12 12+-13 13+-14 14+-15
15+-16
16+-17 17+
Total Number
67
58
186
605
1082
1534
1058
315
53
COHb' DATA
N
NON X.
SMOKERS S.D.
SEM
N
CIGARETTE X.
SMOKERS S.D.
SEM
47
1.35
0.66
0.10
18
4.92
3.16
0.75
45
1.75
0.70
0.10
11
4.83
1.49
0.45
123
1.82
1.18
0.11
59
5.75
2.80
0.36
400
1.89
0.04
0.04
178
5.24
2.24
0.17
651
2.00
0.91
0.04
346
6.08
2.46
0.13
906
2.00
0.73
0.02
471
6.37
2.33
0.11
552
2.07
0.72
0.03
393
6.37
2.42
0.12
151
2.32
1.31
0.11
124
6.65
2.63
0.24
15
2.40
0.41
0.11
31
7.67
2.39
0.43
4J
C
01
u
M
cu
(X
2 -r
0
10
10+ 11+ 12+ 13+ 14+ 15+
11 12 13 14 15 16
HEMOGLOBIN
16+
17
0-7
-------
0-10
Table J-8.
MIAMI
RELATIONSHIP OF HEMOGLOBIN TO COHB
10+-11 11+-12 12+-13 13+-14 14+-15 15+-16 16+-17 17+
Total Number
24
18
58
189
317
404
310
176
49 ]
COHb DATA
N
NON X.
SMOKERS S.D.
SEM
N
CIGARETTE X.
SMOKERS S.D.
SEM
3
1.37
0.71
0.41
12
6.07
4.20
1.21
5
1.14
0.34
0.15
6
5.98
3.41
1.39
11
1.14
0.53
0.16
19
4.17
2.54
0.58
48
1.26
0.96
0.14
81
4.43
2.90
0.32
87
1.34
1.14
0.12
133
4.80
2.68
0.23
93
1.32
1.05
0.11
204
5.15
2.48
0.17
103
1.52
1.03
0.10
147
5.31
2.40
0.20
39
1.63
0.88
0.14
103
5.69
2.50
0.25
11
1.61
0.72
0.22
26
6.37
2.64
0.52
-------
Table J-9.
MILWAUKEE
RELATIONSHIP OF HEMOGLOBIN TO COHB
0-10 10+-11 11+-12 12+-13 13+-14 14+-15 15+-16 16+-17 17+
Total Number
311
267
399
634
932
963
796
427
168
COHb DATA
N
NON X.
SMOKERS S.D.
SEM
N
CIGARETTE X.
SMOKERS S.D.
SEM
214
1.56
1.02
0.07
66
4.12
2.28
0.28
198
1.39
0.98
0.07
48
3.15
1.72
0.25
260
1.36
1.10
0.07
116
3.64
2.18
0.20
407
1.19
0.63
0.03
191
4.21
2.65
0.19
566
1.20
0.57
0.02
295
.3.93
2.39
0.14
540
1.34
0.87
0.04
328
4.63
2.57
0.14
362
1.36
0.66
0.04
329
5.03
2.38
0T13
187
1.45
0.81
0.06
164
4.79
2.32
0.18
62
1.73
1.80
0.23
79
5.15
2.38
0.27
4J
g
U
n
0)
o.
0
10
10+
11
11+
12
13+ 14+ 15+
13 14 15 16
HEMOGLOBIN
16+
17
J-9
-------
Table J-10.
NEW ORLEANS
RELATIONSHIP OF HEMOGLOBIN TO COHB
0-10 10+-11 11+-12 12+-13 13+-14 14^-15 15+-16 16+-17 17+
Total Number
2
6
10
36
93
146
141
81
23
COHb DATA
N
NON X.
SMOKERS S.D.
SEM
N
CIGARETTE X.
SMOKERS S.D.
SEM
1
2.10
0.00
0.00
1
4.60
0.00
0.00
2
1.90
0.71
0.50
4
6.30
1.41
0.70
2
2.25
1.06
0.75
7
5.77
2.70
1.02
11
1.47
0.38
0.11
24
4.85
1.97
0.40
37
1.85
0.67
0.11
53
5.10
1.96
0.27
48
1.81
0.65
0.09
93
5.51
2.20
0.23
31
1.76
1.22
0.22
96
5.37
2.04
0.21
23
1.80
0.53
0.11
53
6.12
2.44
0.34
4
3.62
3.28
1.64
17
6.44
2.17
0.53
V 8
c
o
O.
N.X
Z
M
O
7
6
5
4
O ..*
2 h
1
0
0
10
10+
11
11+ 12+ 13+ 14+ 15+
12 13 14 15 16
HEMOGLOBIN
16+
17
J-10
-------
Table J-ll.
NEW YORK CITY
RELATIONSHIP OF HEMOGLOBIN TO COHB
0-10 10+-11 11+-12 12+-13 13+-14 14+-15 15+-16 16+-17
Total Number
186
40
181
613
935
1242
1135
391
100
COHb DATA
N
NON X.
SMOKERS S.D.
0 ° SEM
N
CIGARETTE X.
SMOKERS S.D.
• • SKM
81
1.40
0.95
0.11
89
4.35
2.20
0.23
30
1.26
0.44
0.08
18
3.64
1.81
0.43
179
1.27
0.50
0.04
109
3.97
2.35
0.23
419
1.29
0.63
0.03
288
4.18
2.30
0.14
531
1.35
0.69
0.03
360
4.75
2.33
0.12
617
1.51
0.78
0.03
453
5.02
2.32
0.11
346
1.51
0.71
0.04
335
5.36
2.41
0.13
79
1.85
1.18
0.13
118
6.26
2.44
0.22
16
1.66
0.62
0.15
25
7.34
2.09
0.42
« 8
c
m
u
0
10
10+ 11+
11 12
12+ 13+ 14+ 15+ 16+ 17+
13 14 15 16 17
HEMOGLOBIN
J-ll
-------
Table J-12.
PHOENIX
RELATIONSHIP OF HEMOGLOBIN TO COHB
0-10 10+-11 11+-12 12+-13 13+-14
15+-16 16+-17 17+
Total Number
16
44
103
131
88
42
9
2 1 0
COHb DATA
N
NON X.
SMOKERS S.D.
SEM
N
CIGARETTE X.
SMOKERS S.D.
SEM
7
1.67
0.56
0.21
5
5.02
3.72
1.66
24
1.16
0.39
0.08
9
3.50
2.44
0.81
36
1.56
1.12
0.19
33
3.73
2.57
0.45
40
1.17
0.67
0.11
50
4.36
2.42
0.34
21
1.48
0.93
0.20
38
4.72
2.76
0.45
16
1.26
0.54
0.14
16
4.72
1.37
0.34
2
1.15
0.64
0.45
5
5.42
1.92
0.86
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
2
4.25
0.21
0.15
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0
10
10+ 11+
11 12
12+ 13+ 14+ 15+ 16+ IT*
13 14 15 16 17
HEMOGLOBIN
J-12
-------
Table J-13.
ST. LOUIS
RELATIONSHIP OF HEMOGLOBIN TO COHB
0-10
10+-11 11+-12 12+-13 13+-14 14+-15 15+-16 16+-17 17+
^"^^^^"^™^™""^>^^^^^™ i —^^^—---
Total Number
20
28
136
236
313
293
120
24
COHb DATA
N
NON X.
SMOKERS S.D.
SEM
N
CIGARETTE X.
SMOKERS S.D.
SEM
6
1.52
0.45
0.18
1
14.40
0.00
0.00
18
1.42
0.34
0.08
1
1.30
0.00
0.00
20
1.39
0.48
0.11
5
3.12
1.86
0.83
92
1.36
0.39
0.04
33
4.20
1.79
0.31
134
1.39
0.44
0.04
72
5.13
2.22
0.26
187
1.50
0.69
0.05
85
5.52
2.16
0.23
155
1.51
0.44
0.04
89
6.07
2.24
0.24
53
1.62
1.25
0.17
51
5.06
2.14
0.30
8
1.90
1.73
0.61
9
6.63
2.89
0.96
g
o
H
CD
(X
0
10
10+ 11+
11 12
12+ 13* 16* 15+ 16+ 17+
13 14 15 16 17
HEMOGLOBIN
J-13
-------
Table J-14.
SALT LAKE CITY
RELATIONSHIP OF HEMOGLOBIN TO COHB
0-10 10+-11 11+-12 12+-13 13+-14 14+-15 15+-16 16+-17 17H
Total Number
0
1
9
84
121
200
220
123
19
COHb DATA'
N
NON X.
SMOKERS S.D.
SEM
N
CIGARETTE X.
SMOKERS S.D.
SEM
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
2
1.45
0.07
0.50
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
3
1.27
0.15
0.09
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
69
1.23
0.63
0.08
8
4.20
1.60
0.57
77
1.16
0.48
0.05
22
5.10
2.74
0.58
147
1.35
0.92
0.08
34
5.52
2.09
0.36
149
1.47
0.83
0.07
53
5.24
2.45
0.34
85
1.52
0.91
0.10
31
5.51
2.39
0.43
13
1.75
0.90
0.25
4
7.52
2.29
1.15
4J
g
U
M
-------
Table J-15.
SAN FRANCISCO
RELATIONSHIP OF HEMOGLOBIN TO COHB
0-10 10+-11 11+-12 12+-13 13+-14 14+-15 15+-16 16+-17
Total Number
18
23
77
155
268
297
258
150
38
COHb DATA
N
WON X.
SMOKERS S.D.
SEM
N
CIGARETTE X.
SMOKERS S.D.
SEM
16
1.37
0.50
0.13
1
1.00
0.0
0.0
11
1.39
0.57
0.17
7
5.49
2.28
0.86
32
1.57
0.62
0.11
24
5.09
2.59
0.53
79
1.50
0.50
0.06
50
4.86
2.18
0.31
141
1.64
0.72
0.06
94
. 4.49
2.48
0.26
156
1.75
0.59
0.05
96
5.73
2.45
0.25
138
1.82
0.61
0.05
92
5.89
2.25
0.24
72
1.82
0.53
0.06
60
6.02
2.46
0.32
17
1.91
0.61
0.15
14
5.89
2.92
0.78
c
-------
Table J-16.
SEATTLE
RELATIONSHIP OF HEMOGLOBIN TO COHB
0-10 10+-11 11+-12 12+-13 13+-14 14+-15 15+-16 16+-17 17H
Total .Number
2
5
15
90
210
246
269
198
64
COHb DATA
N
NON X.
SMOKERS S.D.
SEM
N
CIGARETTE X.
SMOKERS S.D.
SEM
1
0.70
0.0
0.0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
2
1.15
0.64
0.45
3
4.97
1.88
1.08
10
1.27
0.37
0.12
3
5.33
2.28
1.32
53
1.35
0.45
0.06
20
3.60
1.83
0.41
127
1.56
1.06
0.09
58
4;48
2.22
0.29
130
1.63
0.52
0.05
83
5.64
2.21
0.24
142
1.73
0.71
0.06
88
6.10
2.47
0.26
103
1.93
0.74
0.07
71
6.10
2.46
0.29
17
1.92
0.96
0.23
35
7.05
L.71
0.29
e
0)
u
M
(U
o.
(• ^_ •
0
10
10+ 11+
11 12
12+ 13+ 14+ 15+ 16+ 17+
13 14 15 16 17
HEMOGLOBIN
J-16
-------
Table J-17.
VERMONT-NEW HAMPSHIRE
RELATIONSHIP OF HEMOGLOBIN TO COHB
0-10 10+-11 11+-12 12+-13 13+-14 14+-15 15+-16 16+-17 17+
Total Number
26
21
51
156
266
417
381
175
49
COHb DATA
N
NON X.
SMOKERS S.D.
SEM
N
CIGARETTE X.
SMOKERS S.D.
SEM
15
1.09
0.27
0.07
10
4.54
2.96
0.94
18
1.28
0.46
0.11
1
4.20
0.00
0.00
29
1.20
0.66
0.12
16
4.56
1.51
0.38
109
1.27
0.85
0.08
39
4.70
2.84
0.46
185
1.32
0.63
0.05
69
4.85
2.42
0.29
255
1.33
0.57
0.04
123
4.77
2.52
0.23
227
1.40
0.67
0.05
107
5.12
2.21
0.21
99
1.58
1.04
0.11
53
5.09
2.65
0.36
22
1.35
0.26
0.06
20
5.20
1.76
0.39
O I-1
0 10* 11* 12* 13* 14* 15* IS* 17*
10 11 12 13 U IS 16 17
HEMOGLOBIN
J-17
-------
0-10
Table J-18.
WASHINGTON, D. C.
RELATIONSHIP OF HEMOGLOBIN TO COHB
10+-11 11+-12 12+-13 13+-14 14+--15 15+-16 16+-17 17+
Total Number
21
19
100
256
330
400
373
128
37
COHb DATA
N
NON X.
SMOKERS S.D.
SEM
N
CIGARETTE X.
SMOKERS S.D.
SEM
9
0.97
0.56
0.19
1
1.50
0.00
0.00
7
1.26
0.89
0.33
6
3.97
1.90
0.78
57
0.94
0.38
0.05
19
3.50
2.72
0.63
140
1.07
0.48
0.04
71
3.82
2.34
0.28
183
1.28
0.67
0.05
106
4.06
2.35
0.23
199
1.51
0.79
0.06
130
5.14
2.03
0.18
188
1.73
0.69
0.05
127
5.46
2.10
0.19
60
1.78
0.55
0.07
48
5.54
1.72
0.25
10
1,79
0.39
0.12
18
5.62
2.20
0.52
g
U
H
-------
B
to
3
S
I
APPENDIX. K.
Table K-l.
ANCHORAGE
RELATIONSHIP OF CARBOXYHEMOGLOBIN
TO SMOKING CATEGORY
Cigarettes Cigar Pipe Mixed
N 147 5 7
X- 4.67 3.40 3.33
SD 2.67 1.92 1.94
SEM 0.22 0.86 0.73
7.0
6.0-
5.0
4.0-
3.0
(
i
'
19
5055
2,40
0,55
$
2.0.
1.0
CIGARETTES CIGAR
K-l
-------
Table K-2.
CHICAGO
RELATIONSHIP OF CARBOXYHEMOGLOBIN
TO SMOKING CATEGORY
fj
B3
w
CO
Q
o
o
X
SH
X
N
X.
SD
SEM
Cigarettes
439
5.79
2.40
0.12
Cigar
25
4.41
3.46
0.69
Pipe
17
3.68
1.64
0.40
Mixed
26
4.94
2.86
0.56
7.0
6.0-
5.0
4.0
rs 3.0
2.0
1.0
t
CIGARETTES
CIGAR
PIPE
MIXED
K-2
-------
Table K-3.
DENVER
RELATIONSHIP OF CARBOXYHEMOGLOBIN
TO SMOKING CATEGORY
Cigarettes
Cigar
Pipe
Mixed
N 913 30 25 86
X. 5.67 3.83 3.88 5.94
SD 2.35 2.96 2.09 2.47
SEM 0.08 0.54 0.42 0.27
7.0
•
6.0-
5.0
4.0
a
5=
«
( i
1
(
1
o
3.0-
u 2.0
1.0
CIGARETTES CIGAR
K-3
PIPE
MIXED
-------
Table K-4.
DETROIT
RELATIONSHIP OF CARBOXYHEMOGLOBIN
TO SMOKING CATEGORY
S
CQ
S
O
i
7.0
6.0
5.0
4.0
3.0
2.0
1.0
Cigarettes
Cigar
Pipe
Mixed
N
X.
SD
SEM
723
5.97
2.46
0.09
103
3.54
3.19
0.32
64
3.32
2.36
0.29
89
5.63
3.18
0.34
f
CIGARETTES CIGAR
PIPE
MIXED
K-4
-------
Table K-5.
HONOLULU
a
to
SB
I
2g
o
RELATIONSHIP OF CARBOXYHEMOGLOBIN
TO SMOKING CATEGORY
7.0
6.0
5.0
4.0
3.0
2.0
1.0
Cigarettes
Cigar
Pipe
Mixed
N
X.
SD
SEM
521
5.16
2.25
0.10
25
2.29
1.34
2.7
21
2.31
1.34
0.29
57
5.27
2.48
0.33
CIGARETTES CIJAR
PIPE
MIXED
K-5
-------
Table K-6.
HOUSTON
RELATIONSHIP OF CARBOXYHEMOGLOBIN
TO SMOKING CATEGORY
55
M
PQ
3
CJ
p
u.
§
7.0
6.0
5.0
4.0
3.0
2.0
1.0
Cigarettes
Cigar
Pipe
Mixed
N
X.
SD
SEM
18
4.05
2.54
0.60
2
3.70
3.68
2.60
1
1.30
0.0
0.0
1
3.30
0.0
0.0
CIGARETTES CIGAR
PIPE
MIXED
K-6
-------
Table K-7.
LOS ANGELES
RELATIONSHIP OF CARBOXYHEMOGLOBIN
TO SMOKING CATEGORY
a
a
i—i
«
s
1
0!
S
6.0
5.0i
4.0
3.0
2.0
1.0
Cigarettes
Cigar
Pipe
Mixed
N 1631
X. 6.18
SD 2.46
SEM 0.06
'•« 1
106
3.42
2.44
0.24
161 121
3.45 5.92
1.95 2.72
0.15
«
0.25
i
CIGARETTES CIGAR
K-7
PIPE
MIXED
-------
Table K-8. :
MIAMI
RELATIONSHIP OF CARBOXYHEMOGLOBIN
TO SMOKING CATEGORY
Cigarettes
Cigar
Pipe
Mixed
N
X.
SD
SEM
731
5.16
2.63
0.10
38
3.01
3.55
0.58
20
2.55
1.53
0.34
48
4.62
3.42
0.49
7.0
6.Q
5.0
4.0
w
s
s
O
Q
3.0
i.o-
CIGARETTES
CIGAR
K-8
PIPE
MIXED
-------
Table K-9.
MILWAUKEE
RELATIONSHIP OF CARBOXYHEMOGLOBIN
TO SMOKING CATEGORY
25
M
PQ
s
O
o
1
88
o
7.0
6.0-1
5.0-1
4.0
3.0
2.0
1.0
Cigarettes
Cigar
Pipe
Mixed
N
X.
SD
SEM
1616
4.44
2.46
0.06
89
2.87
2.70
0.29
110
2.88
2.29
0.22
77
4.45
2.93
0.33
CIGARETTES
CIGAR
K-9
PIPF
MIXED
-------
Table K-10. :
NEW ORLEANS
RELATIONSHIP OF CARBOXYHEMOGLOBIN
TO SMOKING CATEGORY
Cigarettes
Cigar
Pipe
Mixed
hJ
g
w
s
O
1
w
>"
X
a
N 348 10 5 15
X. 5.51 4.69 4.40 5.47
SD 2.16 3.47 2.97 2.36
SEM 0.12 1.10 1.33 0.61
7.0
•
6.0-
•
5.0-
4.0-
3.0
1
i
i
>
i
2.0-
1.0
CIGARETTES
CIGAR
K-10
PIPE
MIXED
-------
Table K-ll.
NEW YORK CITY
RELATIONSHIP OF CARBOXYHEMOGLOBIN
TO SMOKING CATEGORY
B
I
7.0
6.0
5.0
4.0
3.0
2.0
1.0
Cigarettes
Cigar
Pipe
Mixed
N
X.
SD
SEM
1795
4.90
2.42
0.06
144
3.15
2.84
0.24
145
2. 62
1.83
0.15
144
4.69
2.74
0.23
CIGARETTES CIGAR
K-n
-------
Table K-12.
PHOENIX
RELATIONSHIP OF CARBOXYHEMOGLOBIN
TO SMOKING CATEGORY
a
S
pa
o
o
><
§
7.0
6.0'
5.0'
4.0
3.0
2.0
1.0
Cigarettes
Cigar
Pipe
Mixed
N
X.
SO
SEM
158
4.36
2.48
0.20
2
1.60
0.28
0.20
8
3.14
2.57
0.91
8
3.92
3.30
1.17
CIGARETTES
CIGAR
PIPE
MIXED
K-12
-------
Table K-13.
ST. LOUIS
RELATIONSHIP OF CARBOXYHEMOGLOBIN
TO SMOKING CATEGORY
7.0
6.0
5.0.
4.0
3.0
2.0
1.0
Cigarettes
Cigar
Pipe
Mixed
N
X.
SD
SEM
346
5.39
2.31
0.12
29
3.15
3.08
0.57
36
3.00
1.78
0.30
51
4.45
2.57
0.36
CIGARETTES CIGAR
PIPE
MIXED
K-13
-------
Table K.-I4.
SALT LAKE CITY
RELATIONSHIP OF CARBOXYHEMOGLOBIN
TO SMOKING CATEGORY
N
X.
SD
SEM
Cigarettes
152
5.34
2.38
0.19
Cigar
6
3.10
2.45
1.00
Pipe
9
3.44
2.90
0.97
Mixed
10
6.44
1.92
0.61
7.0
6.0
5.0-
4.0
•J
1 -
z:
^~^
PQ
3 3.0-
o
o
X
1 -
(
2.0-
1.0
CIGARETTES CIGAR
PIPE
MIXED
K-H
-------
Table K-15.
SAN FRANCISCO
RELATIONSHIP OF CARBOXYHEMOGLOBIN
TO SMOKING CATEGORY
Cigarettes
Cigar
Pipe
Mixed
N
X.
SD
SEM
438
5.39
2.47
0.12
21
3.60
3.31
0.72
32
2.80
2.00
0.35
48
5.07
2.49
0.36
7.0
6.0
5.0
4.0
g '• '
a • •
g
i"^
«
S 3.0
(
2.0
1.0
CIGARETTES CIGAR PIPE MHED
K-15
-------
Table K-16.
SEATTLE
RELATIONSHIP OF CARBOXYHEMOGLOBIN
TO SMOKING CATEGORY
w
z
i—i
pa
s
O
pa
sg
t>
Cigarettes Cigar Pipe Mixed
N 361 16 24 36
X. 5.67 4.03 3.51 6.00
SD 2.40 3.81 2.15 2.71
SEM 0.13 0.95 0.44 0.45
7.0
•
6.0
5.0'
•
4.0
3.0'
•
1
<
I
•1 >
2.0
1.0
CIGARETTES
CIGAR
PIPE
MIXED
K-16
-------
Table K-17.
VERMONT - NEW HAMPSHIRE
RELATIONSHIP OF CARBOXYHEMOGLOBIN
TO SMOKING CATEGORY
3
a
ra
s
o
o
&1
i
Cigarettes
Cigar
Pipe
Mixed
N
X.
SD
SEM
438
4.90
2.42
0.12
28 58 42
3o69 2»27 4o36
3o5l Io70 2,18
0,66 ©o22 0.34
7.0
6.0
5.0
4.0
3.0
2.0
1.0
I
CIGARETTES CIGAR
B5ESEB
K-17
-------
Table K-18.
WASHINGTON D. C.
RELATIONSHIP OF CARBOXYHEMOGLOBIN
TO SMOKING CATEGORY
Cigarettes
Cigar
Pipe
Mixed
N 526 55 58 47
X. 4.80 3.71 2.83 5.06
SD 2.27 3.84 1.79 3.13
SEM 0.10 0.52 0.24 0.46
7.0
6.0-
5.0-
4.0-
tJ
£
a
*-v
»
M
pa
3 3-°"
\
i
( i
i
< i
2.0
1.0
CIGARETTES CIGAR PIPE MIXED
K-18.
-------
APPENDIX
L.
Table L-l.
ANCHORAGE
MALE
FEMALE
MALE
AND
FEMALE
COHb: AGE
AGE
WHITE
NONWHITE
RACES COMBINED
WHITE
NONWHITE
RACES COMBINED
WHITE
NONWHITE
RACES COMBINED
1-9
0.0
(0)
1.70
(2)
1.70
(2)
0.0
(0)
0.87
(6)
0.87
(6)
0.0
(0)
1.07
(8)
1.07
(8)
, SEX
10-19
0.0
(0)
2.57
(8)
2.57
(8)
0.0
(0)
2.34-
(14)
2.34
(14)
0.0
(0)
2.43
(22)
2.43
(22)
, AND RACE FOR
20-29
1.89
(23)
1.00
(1)
1.85
(24)
1.96
0.0
(0)
1.96
(7)
1.91
(30)
1.00
(1)
1.88
(31)
30-39
1.99
(23)
1.10
(2)
1.92'
(25)
1.45
(4)
0.50
(2)
1.13
(6)
1.91
(27)
0.80
(4)
1.76
(31)
NONSMOKERS
40-49
2.18
(22)
(0)
2.18
(22)
1.77
(7)
1.30.
(2)
1.67
(9)
2.08
(29)
(2).
2.03
(31)
50-59
1.79
(13).
1.40
(2).
1.74
(15)
1.80 .
(4)
0.70
(2)
1.43
(6)
1.79
(17)
1.05
(4)
1.65
(21)
60-69
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
1.23
(6)
1.23
(6)
0.0
(0)
1.23
(6)
1.23
(6)
ALL
70+ | AGES
0.0
(0)
2.20
(2)
2.20
(2)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
2.20
(2)
2.20
(2)
1.98
(81)
2.02
(17)
1.99
(98)
1.78
(22)
1.57
(32)
1.66
(54)
1.94
(103)
1.73
(49)
1.87
(152)
COHb: AGE, SEX, AND RACE FOR SMOKERS
MALI
FEMALE
MALE
AND
FEMALE
AGE
WHITE
NONWHITE
RACES COMBINED
WHITE
NONWHITE
RACES COMBINED
WHITE
NONWHITE
RACES COMBINED
1-9
0.0
(Q)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0,0
(0)
0;90
(2)
0.90
(2)
0.0
(0)
0.90
(2)
0.90
(2)
10-19
3,67'
(4)
1.66
(10)
2.24
(14)
0.0
(0)
1.65
(8)
1.65
(8)
3.67
(4)
1.66
(18)
2.02
(22)
20-29
5.50
(27)
3.07
(7)
5.00
(34)
4.52
(6)
3.90
(4)
4.27
(10)
5.32
(33)
3.37
(11)
4.83
(44)
30-39
5.48
(25)
4.67
(12)
5.22
(37)
4.12
(5)
3d7
(6)
3.60
(11)
5,25
00)
4=1?
CIS)
^.85
(4i5
40-49
6.50
(22)
4.91
(7)
6»12
(29)
7. 4Q.
(4)
4.35
(4)
5,87
•<8>
@oS4
(26)
4o71
(flUTl
^af
6.0?
(37)
50-59
4.95
(10)
3.73
(3)
4o6?
(13)
7.20
(1)
3.90
(6)
4.37
(7)
5.15
(11)
3084
(f)
&c.SS
C2@)
60-69
6.90
(1)
7.50
(2)
7.30
(3)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
CO)
6.90
CD
7.50
(2)
?U3©
(3)
ALL
70+
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
1.70
(2)
1.70
(2)
0.0
(0)
1.70
(2)
1.70
(2)
AGES
5.61
(89)
3.77
(41)
5.03
(130
5.28
(16)
2.93
(32)
3.71
(48)
5.56
(ios;
3.40'
(73)
4.68
(178!
L-l
-------
Table L-2.
CHICAGO
COHb: AGE, SEX, AND RACE FOR NONSMOKERS
AGE
MALE
FEMALE
MALE
AND
FEMALE
WHITE
NONWHITE
RACES COMBINED
WHITE
NONWHITE
RACES COMBINED
WHITE
NONWHITE
RACES COMBINED
1-9
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
10-19
2.17
(46)
1.43
(3)
2.13
(49)
1.52
(29)
1.60
(1)
1.52
(30)
1.92
(75)
1.47
(4)
1.90
(79)
20-29
1.77
(82)
2.27
(15)
1.85
(97)
1.87
(30)
1.80
(2)
1.86
(32)
1.80
(112)
2.21
(17)
1.85
(129)
30-39
2.10
(43)
2.18
(6)
2.11
(49)
1.73
(12)
3.40
(1)
1.86 .
(13)
2.02
(55)
2.36
(7)
2.06
C62)
40-49
2.08
(41)
3.07
(10)
2.27
(51)
2.39
(28)
1.90
(1)
2.37
(29)
2.20
(69)
2.96
(11)
2.31
(80)
50-59
2.33
(24)
2.10
(3)
2.31
(27)
2.08
(18)
2.80
(1)
2.12
(19)
2.22
(42)
2.27
(4)
2.23
(46)
60-69
2.70
(1)
0.0
(0)
2.70
(1)
2.65
(4)
0.0
(0)
2.65
(4)
2.66
(5)
0.0
(0)
2.66
(5)
70+
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
<0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
ALL
AGES
2.02
(237)
2.39
(37)
2.07
2.74
1.95
(121)
2.22
(6)
1.96
(127)
2.00
(358)
2.37
(43)
2.04
(401)
COHb: AGE, SEX, AND RACE FOR SMOKERS
•^•••••^••^^H
MALE
FEMALE
MATT?
AND
FEMALE
AGE
^•^^^•MHMMMM^B^MMHMHMMi
WHITE
NONWHITE
RACES COMBINED
WHITE
NONWHITE
RACES COMBINED
WHITE
NONWHITE
RACES COMBINED
1-9
••••••••••M
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
10-19
••••MMMMMi
3.55
(25)
4.43
(3)
3.64
(28)
3.25
(13)
6.60
(1)
3.49
(14)
3.44
'38)
4.97
(4)
3.59
(42)
20-29
5.33
(91)
6.17
(40)
5.59
(131)
4.94
(25)
5.90
(2)
5.01
(27)
5.25
ai6)
6.16
(42)
5.49
(158)
30-39
5.79
r52)
6.24
(51)
6.01
(103)
5.00
(11)
7.10
(5)
5.66
(16)
5.66
(63)
6.31
(56)
5.96
(119)
40-49
6.13
(58)
6.15
(42)
6.14
(100)
6.13
(14)
11.10
(1)
6.46
(15)
6.13
(72)
6.27
(43)
6.18
(115)
50-59
6.24
(36)
5.57
(11)
6.09
(47)
5.25
(8)
2.80
(1)
4.98
(9)
6.06
(44)
5.34
(12)
5.91
(56)
60-69
0.0
(0)
2.20
(1)
2.20
a)
3.10
(1)
0.0
(0)
3.10
(1)
3.10
(1)
2.20
(1)
2.65
(2)
ALL
70+
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
ro)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
ACE'i
5.56
(262)
6.08
(148)
5.75
(410)
4.88
(72)
6.78
(10)
5.12
(82)
5.41
(334)
6.13
(158)
5.64
(492)
L-2 -
-------
Table L-3.
DENVER
COHb: AGE, SEX, AND RACE FOR NONSMOKERS
MALE
FEMALE
MALE
AND
FEMALE
AGE
WHITE
NONWHITE
RACES COMBINED
WHITE
NONWHITE
RACES COMBINED
WHITE
NONWHITE
RACES COMBINED
1-9
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
10-19
1.88
(11)
3.00
(3)
2.12
(14)
1.66
(18)
0.0
(0)
1.66
(18)
1.74
(29)
3.00
(3)
1.86
(32)
20-29
2.22
(165)
2.54
(45)
2.29
(210)
1.83
(73)
2.15
(17)
1.89
(90)
2.10
(238)
2.44
(62)
2.17
(300)
30-39
2.09
(124)
2.29
(26)
2.12
(150)
1.80
(49)
1.72
(5)
1.79
(54)
2.01
(173)
2.20
(31)
2.04
(204)
40-49
2.05
(91)
2.52
(8)
2.09
(99)
1.82
'32)
2.23
(3)
1.85
(35)
1.99
(123)
2.45
(ID
2.03
(134)
50-59
2.23
(52)
S. 80
(3)
2.27
(55)
1.75
(15)
0.0
(0)
1.75
(16)
2.13
(67)
2.80
(3)
2.16
(70)
60-69
2.27
(3)
0.0
(0)
2.27
(3)
2.00
(1)
0.0
(0)
2.00
(1)
2.20
(4)
0.0
(0)
2.20
(4)
ALL
70+
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
AGES
2.15
(446)
2.49
(85)
2.20
(531)
1.80
(188)
2.07
(25)
1.83
(213)
2.04
(634)
2.40
(110)
2.09
(744)
COHb: AGE, SEX, AND RACE FOR SMOKERS
AGE
1-9
10-19 20-29 30-39 40-49 50-59 60-69
70+
Air,
••••••••••MM
MALE
FEMALE
MALE
AND
FEMALE
••••^•^•••^••••••••••••••M
WHITE
NONWHITE
RACES COMBINED
WHITE
NONWHITE
RACES COMBINED
WHITE
NONWHITE
RACES COMBINED
•••MMMMBMH
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
4.78
(29)
4.06
(7)
4.64
(36)
4.16
(7)
5.80
(3)
4.65
(10)
4.66
(36)
4.58
(10)
4.64
(46)
5.61
(288)
4.74
(112)
5.37
(400)
5.03
(59)
3.26
(17)
4.64
(76)
5.55
(347)
4.55
(129)
5.25
(476)
6.30
(164)
4.84
(56)
5.93
(220)
4.89
(35)
5.03
(6)
4.91
(41)
6.05
0199)
4. 86
(62>)
5.111
(2S1)
6.35
(137)
5.94
(27)
6.28
(164)
6.64
(28)
3.55
(2)
6.43
(30)
6 ,,4©
ass)
5.78
(29)
(So 3©
a»4}
6.81
(48)
4.06
(8)
(5.42
(56)
4.06
(5)
0.0
ro)
4.06
(5)
6.55
(S3)
4. @6
(8)
(5,23
C6JL)
5.66
(5)
2.80
(1)
5.18
(6)
2.20
(1)
©.0
(0)
2.20
(1)
5.08
(6)
2.80
a)
4,76
cn
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
5.98
(671)
4.87
(211)
5.71
(882)
5.23
(135)
3.94
(28)
5.00
(163)
5.85
(806)
4.76 '
(239)
5.60
(1045)
L-3
-------
Table L-4.
DETROIT
COHb: AGE, SEX, AND RACE FOR NONSMOKERS
MALE
FEMALE
MALE
AND
FEMALK
AGE
WHITE
'NONWHITE
RACES COMBINED
WHITE
NONWHITE
RACES COMBINED
WHITE
NONWHITE
RACES COMBINED
1-9
0
(0)
0
(0)
0
(0)
0
(0)
0
(0)
0
(0)
0
(0)
0
(0)
0
(0)
10-19
1.26
(23)
1.40
(3)
1.28
(26)
0.94
(36)
0
(0)
0.94
(36)
1.06
(59)
1.40
(3)
1.08
(62)
20-29
1.70
(182)
1.86
(19)
1.71
(201)
1.35
(67)
1.33
(6)
1.35
(73)
1.60
(249)
1.73
(25)
1.61
(274)
30-39
1.58
(248)
1.93
(9)
1.59
(257)
1.25
(49)
0
(0)
1.95-
(49)
1.03
(297)
1.93
(9)
1.54
(306)
40-49
1.68
(286)
2.40
(4)
1.69
(290)
1.25
(50)
1.40
(1)
1.25
(51)
1.62
(336)
2.20
(5)
1.60
(341)
50-59
1.62
(138)
0
(0)
1.62
(138)
1.72
(33)
0
(0)
1.75
(33)
1.64
(171)
0
(0)
1.64
(171)
60-69
1.37
(16)
0
(0)
1.37
(16)
1.35
(2)
0
(0)
1.35
(2)
1.37
(18)
0
(0)
1.37
(18)
ALL
70+
0
(0)
0
(0)
0
(0)
0
(0)
0
(0)
0
(0)
0
(0)
0
(0)
0
AGES
1.63
(893)
1.90
(35)
1.64
(928)
1.30
(237)
1.34
(7)
1.30
(244)
1.56
(1130)
1.81
(42)
1.57
(0) | (1172)
COHb: AGE, SEX, AND RACE FOR SMOKERS
MALE
FEMALE
MALE
AND
FEMALE
AGE
WHITE
NONWHITE
RACES COMBINED
WHITE
NONWHITE
RACES COMBINED
WHITE
NONWHITE
RACES COMBINED
1-9
0
(0)
0
(0)
0
(0)
0
(0)
0
(0)
0
(0)
0
(0)
0
(0)
0
(0)
10-19
4.26
(12)
4.00
(1)
4.24
(13)
3.27
(12)
0
(0)
3.27
(12)
3.76
(24)
4.0
(1)
3.77
(25)
20-29
5.17
(188)
5.40
(16)
5.19
(204)
4.52
(41)
4.10
(4)
4.48
(45)
5.05
(229)
5.14
(20)
5.06
(249)
30-39
5.91
(233)
6.22
(8)
5.92
(241)
5.41
(33)
3.20
(1)
5.34
(34)
5.85
(266)
5.89
(9)
5.85
(275)
40-49
5.80
(261)
5.81
(11)
5.80
(272)
5.49
(28)
0
(0)
5.49
(28)
5.77
(289)
5.81
(11)
5.77
(300)
50-59
5.38
(94)
6.20
(4)
5.41
(98)
6.25
(16)
0
(0)
6.25
(16)
5.50
(110)
6.20
(4)
5.53
(114)
60-69
5.82
(6)
3.70
(1)
5.51
(7)
0
(0)
0
(0)
0
(0)
5.82
(6)
3.70
(1)
5.51
(7)
ALL
70+
0
(0)
0
(0)
0
(0)
0
(0)
0
(0)
0
(0)
0
(0)
0
(0)
0
(0)
AGFS
5.61
(794)
5.67
(41)
5.61
(835)
5.05
(130)
3.92
(5)
5.01
(135)
5.53
(924)
5.48
(46)
5.53
(970)
L-4
-------
Table L-5.
HONOLULU
COHb: AGE, SEX, AND RACE FOR NONSMOKERS
MALE
FEMALE
MALE
AND
FEMALE
AGE
WHITE
NONWHITE
RACES COMBINED
WHITE
NONWHITE
RACES COMBINED
WHITE
NONWHITE
RACES COMBINED
1-9
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
10-19
1.25
(2)
1.90
(2)
1.57
(4)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
1.25
(2)
1.90
(2)
1.57
(4)
ALL
20-29 30-39 40-49 50-59 60-69 704- AGES
1.63 1.45 1.49 1.62 1.42 0.0 1.54
(58) (47) (29) (22) (5) (0) (163)
1.51 1.45 1.72 1.44 1.51 0.0 1.55
(64) (101) (90) (32) (7) (0) (296)
1.57 1.45 1.66 1.51 1.47 0.0 1.55
(122) (148) (119) (54) (12) (0) (459)
1.26 1.23 1.27 1.90 0.90 0.0 1.29 '
(8) (7) (8) (2) (1) (0) (26)
1.43 2.38 1.64 1.44 0.0 0.0 1.76
(3) (5) (5) (5) (0) (0) (18)
1.31 1.71 1.42 1.57 0.90 0.0 1.48
(11) (12) (13) (7) (1) (0) (44)
1.59 1.42 1.45 1.64 1.33 0.0 1.51
(66) (54) (37) (24) (6) (0) (189)
1.51 1.50 1.71 1.44 1.51 0.0 1.56
(67) (106) (95) (37) (7) (0) (314)
1.55 1.47 1.64 1.52 1.43 0.0 1.54
(133) (160) (132) (61) (13) (0) (503)
COHb: AGE, SEX, AND RACE FOR SMOKERS
AGE
MALE
FEMALE
MALE
AND
FEMALE
WHITE
NONWHITE
RACES COMBINED
WHITE
NONWHITE
RACES COMBINED
WHITE
NONWHITE
RACES COMBINED
1-9
•MMBMMVH
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
10-19
MVMMII
2,70
(2)
3.00
(3)
2.88
(5)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
2.70
(2)
3.00
(3)
2.88
(5)
20-29
••••••••MMM
5.19
(97)
4.52
(124)
4.82
(221)
4.02
(6)
4.21
(8)
4.13
(14)
5.12
(103)
4.51
(132)
4.77
(235)
30-39
IVMMBBMMIMM
5.12
(49)
4.99
(116)
5.03
(165)
7.44
(5)
4.60
(5)
6.02
(10)
5.34
(54)
4.98
(121)
5.09
(175)
40-49
Wlfmmmtmmmi^mm
4.95
(43)
5.16
(87)
5.09
(130)
4.93
(3)
7.30
(4)
6.29
(7)
4o95
(46)
5.2S
(91)
5.15
(137)
50-59
iMMMMMMMM
5.06
(31)
4.46
(27)
4.78
(58)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
5,06
(31)
4.46
(27)
4*78
(58)
60-69
5.69
(7)
1.00
(1)
5.10
(8)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
5.69
(7)
1.00
(1)
5.10
(3)
70+
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
'0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
ALL
AGE;J
5.11
(229)
4.80
(358)
4.92
(587)
5.44
(14)
5.05
(17)
5.23
nn
i.rj
(243)
4.81 '
(375)
4.94
(618)
L-5
-------
Table L-6.
HOUSTON
COHb: AGE, SEX, AND RACE FOR NONSMOKERS
MALE
FEMALE
MALE
AND
FEMALE
AGE
WHITE
NONWHITE
*
RACES COMBINED
WHITE
NONWHITE
RACES COMBINED
WHITE
NONWHITE
RACES COMBINED
1-9
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
10-19
0.98
(6)
2.10
(1)
1.14
(7)
0.65
(4)
0.0
(0)
0.65
(41
0.85
(10)
2.10
(1)
0.96
(11)
20-29
1.22
(59)
1.36
(18)
1.25
(77)
2.09
(18)
1.17
(4)
1.93
(22)
1.43
(77)
1.33
(22)
1.40
(99)
30-39
1.55
(34)
1.30
(2)
1.53
(36)
1.31
(14)
0.0
(0)
1.31
(141
1.48
(48)
1.30
(2)
1.47
(50)
40-49
2.03
(39)
0.0
(0)
2.03
(39)
1.38
(13)
0.0
(0)
1.38
(131
1.87
(52)
0.0
(0)
1.87
(52)
50-59
1.37
(19)
0.0
(0)
1.37
(19)
1.11
(7)
0.0
(0)
1.11
(7)
1.30
(26)
0.0
(0)
1.30
(26)
60-69
1.00
(2)
0.0
(0)
1.00
(2)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
1.00
(2)
0.0
(0)
1.00
(2)
ALL
70+
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0}
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
AGES i
1.50
(159)
1.39
(21)
1.48
(180)
1.51
(56)
1.17
(4)
1.48
(fiON
1.50
(215)
1.36
(25)
1.48
(240)
COHb: AGE, SEX, AND RACE FOR SMOKERS
AGE
MALE
FEMALE
MAT T?
AND
FEMALE
WHITE
NONWHITE
RACES COMBINED
WHITE
NONWHITE
RACES COMBINED
WHITE
NONWHITE
RACES COMBINED
1-9
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
10-19
6.90
(1)
3.30
(1)
5.10
(2)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
6.90
(1)
3.30
(1)
5.10
(2)
20-29
3.20
(6)
2.32
(5)
2.80
(11)
2.20
(1)
0.0
(0)
2.20
(1)
3.06
(7)
2.32
(5)
2.75
(12)
30-39
4.40
(2)
5.90
(1)
4.90
(3)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
4.40
(2)
5.90
(1)
4.90
(3)
40-49
5.55
(2)
0.0
(0)
5.55
(2)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
5.55
(2)
0.0
(0)
5.55
(2)
50-59
5.30
(3)
0.0
(0)
5.30
(3)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
5.30
(3)
0.0
(0)
5.30
(3)
60-69
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(O1)
0.0
(0)
0.0
Hi)
70+
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
ALL
a CM:;
4.42
(14).
2.97
(7)
3.94
(21)
2.20
(1)
0.0
(0)
2.20
(1)
4.27
as)
2.97
(7)
3.86
(22)
L-6;
-------
Table L-7.
LOS ANGELES
COHb: AGE, SEX, AND RACE FOR NONSMOKERS
AGE
MALE
FEMALE
MALE
AND
FEMALE
WHITE
NONWHITE
RACES COMBINED
WHITE
NONWHITE
RACES COMBINED
WHITE
NONWHITE
RACES COMBINED
1-9
I^MMMMMmHBMH
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
ALL
10-19 20-29 30-39 40-49 50-59 60-69 70+ AGES
2.24 2.01 2.03 1.96 1.96 1.97 0.0 2.00
(62) (476) (482) (474) (398) (56) (0) (1948
2.22 2.29 2.04 1*99 1.79 1.60 0.0 2.09
(8) (90) (91) (62) (23) (1) (0) (275)
2.23 2.05 2.03 1,97 1.96 1.96 0.0 2.01
(70) (566) (573) (536) (421) (57) (0) (2223
1.81 1.92 1.97 1.91 2,06 2.37 0.0 1.94
(63) (203) (106) (126) (96) (6) (0) (600)
1.82 1.95 2.01 1.77 2.29 0.0 0.0 1.96
(13) (26) (13) (4) (7) (0) (0) (63)
1.81 1.93 1.97 1.91 2.07 2.37 0.0 1.94
(76) (229) (119) (130) (103) (6) (0} r6631
2.02 1.98 2.02 1.95 1.98 2.01 0.0 1.99
(125) (679) (588) (600) (494) (62) (0) (2548;
1.97 2.22 2.03 1.98 1=91 1,60 0.0 2.07
(21) (116) (104) (66) (30) (1) (0) (338)
2.02 2.02 2.02 1.95 1.98 2,00 0.0 2.00
(146) (795) (692) (666) (524) (63) (0) (2886]
COHb: AGE, SEX", AND RACE FOR SMOKERS
AGE
MALE
FEMALE
MALE
AND
FEMALE
WHITE
NONWHITE
••' RACES COMBINED
WHITE
NONWHITE
RACES COMBINED
WHITE
NONWHITE
RACES COMBINED
ALL
1-9 10-19 20-29 30-39 40-49 50-59 60-69 70+ AGKS
0.0 4.56 5.45 6.21 6.26 5.97 5.27 0.0 5.90
(0) (44) (388) (332) (357) (237) (18) (0) (1376
0.0 3.85 4.62 5.21 5.39 6.05 2.40 0.0 5.00
(0) (10) (95) (77) (46) (16) (1) (0) (245)
0.0 4.43 5.29 6.02 6.16 5.97 5.12 0.0 5.77
(0) (54) (483) (409) (403) (253) (IS) (0) (1621
0.0 5.66 5.55 6.35 6.42 5.96 6.53 0.0 6.02
(0) (9) (124) (82) (88) (48) (6) (0) (357)
0.0 5.15 4.63 4.80 7.37 5.25 0.0 0.0 5.37
(0) (2) (18) (7) (9) (2) (0) (0) (38)
0.0 5.56 5.44 6.23 6,51 5.93 6.53 0.0 5.96
(0) (11) (142) (89) (97) (50) (6) (0) (395)
0.0 4.75 5.48 6»24 6029 5.97 5.55 0.0 5.93
(0) (53) (512) (414) (445) fJB^> (24) (0) (1733
0.0 4.07 4.62 5.17 5.71 5<,96 2<,40 0.0 5.05
(0) (12) (113) (84) (55) (?J5) (1) (0) (283)
0.0 4.62 5.32 6.06
-------
Table L-8.
MIAMI
COHb: AGE, SEX, AND RACE FOR NONSMOKERS
MALE
FEMALE
MALE
AND
FEMALE
1-9
WHITE
NONWHITE
RACES COMBINED
WHITE
NONWHITE
RACES COMBINED
WHITE
NONWHITE
RACES COMBINED
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
10-19
1.69
(9)
2.30
(1)
1.75
(10)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
1.69
(9)
2.30
(1)
1.75
(10)
20-29
1.36
(80)
1.80
(42)
1.51
(122)
1.03
(20)
2.22
(6)
1.30
(26)
1.29
(100)
1.86
(48)
1.48
(148)
30-39
1.59
(57)
1.14
(14)
1.50
(71)
1.18
(6)
1.80
(3)
1.39
(9)
1.55
(63)
1.26
(17)
1.49
(80)
40-49
1.23
(60)
1.90
(8)
1.31
(68)
1.13
(24)
0.0
(0)
1.13
(24)
1.20
(84)
1.90
(8)
1.26
(92)
50-59
1.44
(39)
1.30
(3)
1.43
(42)
0.85
(17)
0.0
(0)
0.85
(17)
1.26
(56)
1.30
(3)
1.26
(59)
60-69
1.31
(8)
0.0
(0)
1.31
(8)
1.50
(1)
0.0
(0)
1.50
(1)
1.33
(9)
0.0
(0)
1.33
(9)
ALL
70+
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
AGES
1.40
(253)
1.66
(68)
1.46
(321)
1.04
(68)
2.08
(9)
1.16
(77)
1.33
(321)
1.71
(77)
1.40
(398)
COHb: AGE, SEX, AND RACE FOR SMOKERS
MALE
FEMALE
MALE
AND
FEMALE
i
AGE
WHITE
NONWHITE
RACES COMBINED
WHITE
NONWHITE
RACES COMBINED
WHITE
NONWHITE
RACES COMBINED
1-9
••••••^••H
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
10-19
mmmmmmm^mmmm
4.08
(20)
3.27
(6)
3.90
(26)
2.64
(8)
3.20
(1)
2.70
(9)
3.67
(28)
3.26
(7)
3.59
(35)
20-29
IVMBVBB^HMViWi
4.41
(215)
5.00
(131)
4.63
(346)
4.13
(23)
2.90
(6)
3.87
(29)
4.38
(238)
4.91
(137)
4.57
(375)
30-39
5.44
(110)
5.54
(68)
5.47
(178)
5.40
(14)
4.50
(3)
5.24
(17)
5.43
(124)
5.49
(71)
5.45
(195)
40-49
5.69
(109)
5.49
(29)
5.65
(138)
5.52
(18)
0.0
(0)
5.52
(18)
5.67
(127)
5.49
(29)
5.63
(156)
50-59
4.73
(54)
0.0
(0)
4.73
(54)
5.46
(13)
7.40
(1)
5.60
(14)
4.87
(67)
7.40
(1)
4.91
(68)
60-69
5.52
(6)
0.0
(0)
5.52
(6)
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
5.52
(6)
0.0
(0)
5.52
(6)
ALL
70+
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
AGES
4.93
(514)
5.17
(234)
5.01
(748)
4. 76
(76)
3.77
(11)
4.64
(87)
4.91
(590)
1
5.11
(245)
4.97
(835)
L-8
-------
Table L-9.
MILWAUKEE
COHb: AGE, SEX, AND RACE FOR NONSMOKERS
AGE
1-9
10-19 20-29 30-39 40-49 50-59 60-69 70+
ALL
AGES
MALE
FEMALE
MALE
AND
FEMALE
WHITE
NONWHITE
RACES COMBINED
WHITE
NONWHITE
RACES COMBINED
WHITE
NONWHITE
RACES COMBINED
•M^BMMMMMOMMi
1.12
(55)
1.23
(16)
1.15
((71)
1.21
(48)
1.28
(13)
1.23
(61)
1.16
(103)
1.26
(29)
1.18
(132)
1.24
'64)
1.22
(26)
1.24
(90)
1.29
(89)
1.44
(89)
1.35
1.25
(153)
1.39
(115)
1.31
(268)
1.36
1.64
(18)
1.39
(165)
1.15
(179)
1.28
(119)
1.20
(298)
1.25
(326)
1.33
(137)
1.27
(463)
1.57
(161)
1.17
(22)
1.52
(183)
1.05
(116)
1.31
(81)
1,16
(197)
1.35
(277)
1.28
(103)
1.33
(380)
1.39
(162)
1.21
'19)
1.52
(181)
1.26
(147)
1.27
(96)
1.26
(243)
1.33
(309)
1.26
(115)
1.31
(424)
1.56
(83)
1.70
(21)
1.59
(104)
1.39
(138)
1.20
(125)
1.36
(263)
1.45
(221)
1.27
(146)
1.38
r367)
MB_*MB««BMMUI
1.71
(74)
1.45
(32)
1.64
(106)
1.26
(176)
1.37
(123)
1.31
(299)
1.40
(250)
Jl.39
(155)
1.39
(405)
1.50
(68)
1.82
(9)
1.54
(77)
1.35
(159)
1.16
(45)
1.31
(204)
1.40
(227)
1.27
(54)
1.37
(281)
1.45
(814)
1.40
(163)
1.44
(977)
1.25
(1052)
1.30
r691)
1.27
f!743)
1.33
(1866)
1.32
(854)
1.33
(2720)
COHb: AGE, SEX, "AND RACE FOR SMOKERS
AGE
1-9
10-19 20-29 30-39 40-49 50-59 60-69 70+
ALL
AGES
MALE
FEMALE
MALE
AND
FEMALE
WHITE
NONWHITE
RACES COMBINED
WHITE
NONWHITE
RACES COMBINED
WHITE
NONWHITE
RACES COMBINED
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
ro)
4.34
(39)
3.05
(12)
4.03
(51)
2.97
(40)
2.76
(47)
2.86
(87)
3.65
(79)
2.82
(59)
3.29
(138)
4.47
(148)
4.95
(26)
4.54
(174)
3.91
(149)
3.53
(68)
3.79
(217)
4.19
C297)
3.93
(94)
4.12
(391)
5.26
(168)
5.30
(24)
5.26
(192)
4.64
(90)
3.57
(65)
4.19
(155)
5.04
(£58)
4.04
(89)
4.79
(34?)
5.42
'170)
4.12
(39)
5.18
(209)
5.12
(117)
4.25
(63)
4.82
(180)
5.30
(28/5
4 = 20
(102)
Soffll
(3i5S)
4.48
(102)
4.25
(44)
4.41
(146)
4.75
(99)
3.43
(47)
4.33
(146)
>V» Oi
aei)
3.83
(51)
<£• . 31'
^3£>
3.34
(85)
3.38
(46)
3o35
(131)
3.«y
(58)
3.78
(18)
3.87
(76)
3,56
a*3>
3° 5v5
(64)
(26V)
2.39
(41)
2.74
(13)
2.48
(54)
3.10
(12)
3.04
(7)
3.08
(19)
2.55
(53)
2.84
C20)
2.63
(73)
4.61
(753)
4.08
(204)
4.50
(957)
4.34
(565)
3.56
(315)
4.06
(880)
4.50
(1318)
3.76
(519)
4.29
(1837)
L-9
-------
Table L-10.
NEW ORLEANS
COHb: AGE, SEX, AND RACE FOR NONSMOKERS
MALE
FEMALE
.
MALE
AND
FEMATJE
AGE
WHITE
NONWHITE
RACES COMBINED
WHITE
NONWHITE
RACES COMBINED
WHITE
NONWHITE
RACES COMBINED
1-9
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
10-19
1.16
(5)
1.76
(19)
1.64
(24)
2.20
(2)
1.10
(2)
1.65
(4)
1.46
(7)
1.70
(21)
1.64
(28)
: COHb: AGE, SEX,
MALE
FEMALE
MALE
AND
FEMALE
AGE
WHITE
NONWHITE
RACES COMBINED
WHITE
NONWHITE
RACES COMBINED
1-9
0.0
, (0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
WHITE | 0.0
NONWHITE
RACES COMBINED
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
10-19
4.85
(13)
4.47
(26)
4.60
(39)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
4.85
(13)
4.47
(26)
4.60
(39)
20-29
1.88
(22)
1.98
(39)
1.94
(61)
1.70
(4)
1.60
(2)
1.67
(6)
1.85
(26)
1.96
(41)
1.92
(67)
30-39
1.72
(8)
2.06
(16)
1.95
(24)
1.60
(4)
1.85
(2)
1.68
(6)
1.68
(12)
2.03
(18)
1.89
(30)
40-49
1.54
(10)
1.84
(8)
1.67
(18)
0.0
(0)
1.73
(3)
1.73
(3)
1.54
(10)
1.81
(11)
1.68
(21)
50-59
2.10
(4)
2.63
(3)
2.33
(7)
1.67
(3)
0.90
(1)
1.47
(4)
1.91
(7)
2.20
(4)
2.02
(11)
60-69
0.0
(0)
1.50
(1)
1.50
(1)
(1)
0.0
(0)
2.20
(1)
2.20
(1)
1.50
(1)
1.85
(2)
ALL
70+
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
AGES
1.73
(49)
1.95
(86)
1.87
(135)
(14)
1.52
(10)
1.67
(24)
1.74
(63)
1.90
(96)
1.84
(159)
AND RACE FOR SMOKERS
20-29
5.38
(43)
5.46
(129)
5.44
(172)
3.00
(4)
5.39
(9)
4.65
(13)
5.18
(47)
5.45
(138)
5.38
(185)
30-39
6.58
(38)
6.33
(49)
6.44
(87)
6.12
(5)
4.52
(4)
5.41
(9)
6.52
(43)
6.20
(53)
6.34
(96)
40-49
6.01
(10)
4.97
(26)
5.26
(36)
2.90
(1)
3.47
(4)
3.36
(5)
5.73
(11)
ft. 77
(30)
5.03
(41)
50-59
4.53
(3)
4.74
(11)
4.69
(14)
0.0
(0)
4.40
(2)
4.40
(2)
4.53
(3)
4.68
(13)
4.66
(16)
60-69
4.20
(1)
0.0
(0)
4.20
(1)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
4.20
(1)
0.0
(0)
4.20
(1)
ALL
70+ AGES
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
5.76
(108)
5.44
(241)
5.54
(349)
4.55
(10) .
4.70
(19)
4.65
(29)
5.66
(118)
5.39
(260)
5.47
(378)
L-10
-------
Table L-ll.
NEW YORK CITY
COHb: AGE, SEX, AND RACE FOR NONSMOKERS
AGE
MALE
FEMALE
MALE
AND
FEMALE
WHITE
NONWHITE
RACES COMBINED
WHITE
NONWHITE
RACES COMBINED
WHITE
NONWHITE
RACES COMBINED
1-9
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
ALL
10-19 20-29 30-39 40-49 50-59 60-69 70+ AGES
1.11 1.45 1.47 1.58 1.55 1.76 0.0 1.49
(80) (400) (353) (347) (235) (42) (0) (1457
0.97 1.48 1.56 1.72 1.64 1,00 0.0 1.52
(6) (25) (27) (16) (9) (2) (0) (85)
1.10 1.45 1.48 1.59 1.55 1.72 0.0 1.49 .
(86) (425) (380) (363) (244) (44) (0) (1542
1.21 1.28 1.25 1.22 1.28 1.64 0.0 1.26
(60) (204) (114) (171) (103) (13) (0) (665)
1.07 1.39 1.08 1.39 1.40 0.0 0.0 1.31
(11) (29) (10) (27) (7) (0) (0) (84)
1.19 1.29 1.24 1.25 1.29 1.64 0.0 1.27
(71) (233) (124) (198) (110) (13) (0) (749)
1.16 1.39 1.42 1.46 1.47 1.73 0.0 1.42
(140) (604) (467) (518) (338) (55) (0) (2122
1.04 1.43 1.43 1.51 1.54 ^.00 0.0 1.42
(17) (54) (37) (43) (16) (2) (0) (169)
1.14 1.39 1.42 1.47 1.47 1»70 0.0 1.42
(157) (658) (504) (561) (354) (57) (0) (2291^
COHb: AGE, SEX, AND RACE FOR SMOKERS
AGE
1-9
10-19 20-29 30-39 40-49 50-59 60-69 70+
MALE
FEMALE
MALE
AND
FEMALE
WHITE
NONWHITE
RACES COMBINED
WHITE
NONWHITE
RACES COMBINED
WHITE
NONWHITE
RACES COMBINED
0.0 3.38 4.49 4.95 5.14 4.75 4.84 0.0 4.76
(0) (70) (415) (361) (366) (182) (24) (0) (1418
0.0 3.14 4.15 5.22 4.92 4.94 12.00 0.0 4.57
(0) (9) (80) (36) (30) (13) (1) (0) (160)
0.0 3.35 4.43 4.98 5.13 4.77 5,13 0.0 4.74
(0) (79) (495) (397) (196) (195) (25) (0) (1587
0.0 3.46 4.30 4.75 4.45 4.40 5.19 0.0 4.37
. (0) (47) (193) (92) (125) (82) (8) (0) (547)
0.0 3.13 4.27 4.59 3.92 4.27 0.0 0.0 4.17
(0) (10) (29) (23) (12> (7) (0) (0) (81)
0.0 3.40 4.30 4o72 4.40 4.39 5ol9 0.0 4.34
(0) (57) (222) (115) (137) (89) (8) (0) (628)
0.0 3.41 4.43 4.91 4.97 4.64 4US3 0,0 4.65
(0) (117) (608) (453) (49?) (26£) .:,£} (0) (1965
0.0 3.14 4.18 4.-.J8 6.64 4.K* &.'^ 0.0 4.44
(0) (19) (109) (59) (42) (20) (i) (0) (250)
0.0 3.37 4.39 4.92 4.94 4.65 S~i4 0.0 4.63
(0) (136) (717) (512) (533) (234) ;3l) (0) (2215
L-n
-------
Table L-12.
PHOENIX
COHb: AGE, SEX, AND RACE FOR NONSMOKERS
AGE
MALE
FEMALE
MALE
AND
FEMALE
WHITE
NONWHITE
RACES COMBINED
WHITE
NONWHITE
RACES COMBINED
WHITE
NONWHITE
RACES COMBINED
1-9
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
10-19
1.37
(4)
1..53
(3)
1.44
(7)
2.10
(1)
0.0
(0)
2.10
(1)
1.52
(5)
1.53
(3)
1.52
(8)
20-29
1.78
(27)
1.76
(12)
1.77
(39)
1.16
(14)
0.40
(1)
1.11
(15)
1.57
(41)
1.65
(13)
1.59
(54)
30-39
0.89
(8)
1.45
(10)
1.20
(18)
1.18
(9)
1.20
(2)
1.18
(11)
1.04
(17)
1.41
(12)
1.19
(29)
40-49
1.50
(25)
1.00
(3)
1.45
(28)
1.40
(6)
1.05
(2)
1.31
(8)
1.48
(31)
1.02
(5)
1.42
(36)
50-59
1.22
(12)
1.90
(4)
1.39
(16)
1.37
(3)
0.0
(0)
1.37
(3)
1.25
(15)
1.90
(4)
1.38
(19)
60-69
1.00
(1)
0.0
(0)
1.00
(1)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
1.00
(1)
0.0
(0)
1.00
(1)
70+
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
ALL
AGES
1.48
(77)
1.59
(32)
1.51
(109)
1.26
(33)
0.98
(5)
1.22
(38)
1.41
(110)
1.51
(37)
1.43
(147)|
COHb: AGE, SEX, AND RACE FOR SMOKERS
MALE
FEMALE
MALE
AND
FEMALE
AGE
WHITE
NONWHITE
RACES COMBINED
WHITE
NONWHITE
RACES COMBINED
WHITE
¥V il J. X t-t
NONWHITE
RACES COMBINED
1-9
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
10-19
3.63
(3)
2.30
(6)
2.74
(9)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
3.63
(3)
2.30
(6)
2.74
(9)
20-29
4.08
(30)
2.99
(12)
3.77
(42)
3.26
(12)
0.0
(0)
3.26
(12)
3.85
(42)
2.99
(12)
3.66
(54)
30-39
5.04
(40)
5.00
(9)
5.04
(49)
-sTsT"
(8)
2.70
(1)
3.49
(9)
4.80
(48)
4.77
(10)
4.80
(58)
40-49
4.52
(30)
3.43
(3)
4.42
(33)
"""02
(4)
0.0
(0)
4.12
(4)
4.47
(34)
3.43
(3)
4.39
(37)
50-59
4.83
(15)
4.10
(2)
4.74
(17)
0.0 "
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
4.83
(15)
4.10
(2)
4.74
(17)
60-69
4.60
(1)
0.0
(0)
4.60
(1)
0.0 '"
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
4.60
(1)
0.0
(0)
4.60
(1)
ALL
70+
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
HTTO
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
AGES
4.60
(119)
3.54
(32)
4.38
(151)
3.51
(24)
2.70
(1)
3.48
(25)
4.42
(143)
3.51
(33)
4.25
(176)
L-12
-------
Table L-13.
ST. LOUIS
COHb: AGE, SEX, AND RACE FOR NONSMOKERS
AGE
MALE
FEMALE
MALE
AND
FEMALE
WHITE
NONWHITE
RACES COMBINED
WHITE
NONWHITE
RACES COMBINED
WHITE
NONWHITE
RACES COMBINED
1-9
0
(0)
0
(0)
0
(0)
0
(0)
0
(0)
0
(0)
0
(0)
0
(0)
0
(0)
10-19
1.51
(11)
0
(0)
1.51
(11)
1.46
(10)
0
(0)
1.46
(10)
1.49
(21)
0
(0)
1.49
(21)
20-29
1.60
(109)
0.70
(1)
1.59
(110)
1.33
(63)
0.95
(2)
1.32
(65)
1.50
(172)
0.87
(3)
1.49
(175)
30-39
1.48
(134)
1.30
(5)
1.47
(139)
1.31
(36)
0
(0)
1.31
(36)
1.44
(170)
1.30
(5)
1.44
(175)
40-49
1.50
(137)
1.77
(3)
1.51
(140)
1.49
(58)
1.80
(1)
1.49
(59)
1.50
(195)
1.77
(4)
1.50
(199)
50-59
1.49
(41)
0.80
(2)
1.46
(43)
1.33
(40)
0
(0)
1.33
(40)
1.41
(81)
0,80
(2)
1.40
(83)
60-69
1.54
(7)
0
(0)
1.54
(7)
1.61
(11)
0
(0)
1.61
(11)
1,58
(18)
0
(0)
1.58
(18)
ALL
70+ j AGES
0
(0)
0
(0)
0
(0)
0
(0)
0
(0)
0
(0)
0
(0)
0
(0)
0
(0)
1.52
(439)
1.28
(11)
1.51
(450)
1.39
(218)
1.23
(3)
1.39
(221)
1.48
(657)
1.27
(14)
1.47
(671)
COHb: AGE, SEX, AND RACE FOR SMOKERS
AGE
1-9
10-19 20-29 30-39 40-49 50-59 60-69 70-!-
MALE
FEMALE
MALE
AND
FEMALE
WHITE
NONWHITE
RACES COMBINED
WHITE
NONWHITE
RACES COMBINED
WHITE
NONWHITE
RACES COMBINED
0
(0)
0
(0)
0
(0)
0
(0)
0
(0)
0
(0)
0
(0)
0
(0)
0
(0)
4.12
(6)
0
(0)
4.12
(6)
4.23
(3)
0
(0)
4.23
(3)
4.16
(9)
0
(0)
4.16
(9)
4.49
(103)
4.30
(5)
4.48
(108)
4.11
(31)
5.90
(1)
4.17
(32)
4.40
(134)
4.57
(6)
4.41
(140)
5.10
(108)
5.68
(5)
5.13
(113)
5.02
(21)
3.70
(1)
4.96
(22)
5.09
(129)
5.35
(6)
5.10
(135)
5.43
(89)
6.85
(2)
5.46
(91)
5.89
(19)
5.80
(1)
5.89
(20)
5.08
(108)
6.50
(3)
5.54
(111)
5.07
(40)
2.40
(1)
5.01
(41)
5.09
(18)
0
(0)
5.09
(18)
5n08
(58)
2_40
(1)
5oG3
(59)
4.92
(5)
0
(0)
4,92
(3)
3.05
(2)
0
(0)
3.05
(2)
4,:. 5)
cr«
0
(«>
->• ^, V
-. -,\
-» '• #
0
(0)
0
(0)
0
(0)
0
(0)
0
(0)
0
(0)
0
(0)
0
(0)
0
(0)
4.98
(351)
5.08
(13)
4.99
(364)
4.84
(94)
5.13
(3)
4.85
(97)
4.95
(445)
5.09
(16)
4.96
(461)
. L-13
-------
Table L-14.
SALT LAKE CITY
COHb: AGE, SEX, AND RACE FOR NONSMOKERS
AGE
1-9
10-19 20-29 30-39 40-49 50-59 60-69 70+ |
ALL
AGES
MALE
FEMALE
MALE
AND
FEMALE
WHITE
NONWHITE
RACES COMBINED
WHITE
NONWHITE
RACES COMBINED
WHITE
NONWHITE
RACES COMBINED
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
1.90
(23)
0.0
(0)
1.90
(23)
1.31
(34)
1.20
(2)
1.30
(36)
1.54
(57)
1.20
(2)
1.53
(59)
1.52
(97)
1.48
(5^
1.52
(102)
1.22
(42)
1.67
(3)
1.25
(45)
1.43
(139)
1.55
(8)
1.43
(147)
1.44
(95)
1.28
(5)
1.43
(100)
1.20
(36)
1.90
(1)
1.22
(37)
1.38
(131)
1.38
(6)
1.38
(137)
1.34
(75)
0.0
(0)
1.34
(75)
1.01
(38)
0.70
(1)
1.00
(39)
1.23
(113)
0.70
(1)
1.22
(114)
1.42
(49)
0.0
(0)
1.42
(49)
1.36
(24)
0.0
(0)
1.36
(24)
1.40
(73)
0.0
(0)
1.40
(73)
1.13
(11)
0.0
(0)
1.13
(11)
1.50
(3)
0.0
(0)
1.50
(3)
1.21
(14)
0.0
(0)
1.21
(14)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
1.46
(350)
1.38
(10)
1.46
(360)
1.21
(177)
1.43
(7)
1.22
(184)
1.37
(527)
1 40
X • ^T \J
(17)
1.38
(544)j
COHb: AGE, SEX, AND RACE FOR SMOKERS
AGE
I 1-9 10-19 20-29 30-39 40-49 50-59 60-69 70+ |
ALL
AGK'.i
MALE
FEMALE
MALE
AND
FEMALE
WHITE
NONWHITE
RACES COMBINED
WHITE
NONWHITE
RACES COMRTNKD
WHITE
NONWHITE
RACES COMBINED
0.0
(0)
0.0
/ r\\
V.W
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0 n
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
4.02
(5)
3.65
xo N
v2/
3.91
(7)
3.56
(5)
0.0
(0)
VSfi
(5)
3.79
(10)
3.65
(2)
3.77
(12)
4.87
(44)
2.90
/ / \
\4/
4.71
(48)
5.01
(10)
4.90
(1)
s = on
(11)
4.90
(54)
3.30
(5)
4.76
(59)
4.96
(25)
5.34
f r.N
(->/
5.02
(30)
6.52
(14)
0.0
(0)
fi.s?
(14)
5.52
(39)
5.34
(5)
5.50
(44)
5.52
(32)
0.0
/ A\
V"/
5.52
(32)
6.22
(5)
0.0
(0)
fi.7?
(5)
5.62
(37)
0.0
(0)
5.62
(37)
6.14
(17)
0.0
/ A\
V"/
6.14
(17)
5.53
(7)
0.0
(0)
s.s?
(7)
5.96
(24)
0.0
(0)
5.96
(24)
7.30
(1)
0.0
/ n\
\."/
7.30
(1)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
7.30
(1)
0.0
(0)
7.30
(1)
0.0
(0)
0.0
/p\
V "/
0.0
(0)
o.o
(0)
0.0
(0)
0,0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
5.22
(124)
4.15
/"11N
V •"• •»•/
5.13
(135)
5.59
(41)
4.90
(1)
S.S7
<-42)
5.31
(165)
4.21
(12)
5.23
(177;
L-14;
-------
Table L-15.
SAN FRANCISCO
COHb: AGE, SEX, AND RACE FOR NONSMOKERS
AGE
MALE
FEMALE
MALE
AND
FEMALE
WHITE
NONWHITE
RACES COMBINED
WHITE
NONWHITE
RACES COMBINED
WHITE
NONWHITE
RACES COMBINED
ALL
1-9 10-19 20-29 30-39 40-49 50-59 60-69 70+ AGES
0.0 1.62 1.71 1.84 1.85 1.77 1.65 1.80 1.78
(0) (14) (122) (97) (96) (66) (15) (1) (411)
0.0 1.55 1.64 1.83 1.93 1.53 0.0 0.0 1.73
(0) (2) (11) (7) (6) (3) (0) (0) (29)
0.0 1.61 1.71 1.84 1.85 1.76 1.65 1.80 1.77
(0) (16) (133) (104) (102) (69) (15) (1) (440)
0.0 1.62 1.59 1.39 1.55 1.51 1.89 0.0 1.55
(0) (12) (95) (35) (20) (33) (7) (0) (202)
0.0 1.20 1.67 1.75 1.45 0.70 0.0 0.0 1.49
(0) (2) (10) (2) (2) (2) (0) (0) (18)
0.0 1.56 1.60 1.41 1.54 1.47 1.89 0.0 1.55
(0) (14) (105) (37) (22) (35) (7) (0) (220)
0.0 1.62 1.66 1.72 1.80 1.68 1.73 1.80 1.70
(0) (26^ (217) (132) (116) (99) (22) (1) (613)
0.0 1.37 1.65 1.81 1.81 1.20 0.0 0.0 1.64
(0) (4) (21) (9) (8) (5) (0) (0) (47)
0.0 1.59 1.66 1.73 1.80 1.66 1.73 1.80 1.70
(0) (30) (238) (141) (124) (104) (22) (1) (660)
COHb: AGE, SEX, AND RACE FOR SMOKERS
AGE
1-9
10-19 20-29 30-39 40-49 50-59 60-69 70+
ALL
MALE
FEMALE
MALE
AND
FEMALE
WHITE
NONWHITE
RACES COMBINED
WHITE
NONWHITE
RACES COMBINED
WHITE
NONWHITE
RACES COMBINED
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
4.33
(17)
0.0
(0)
4.33
(17)
3.74
(13)
3.20
(1)
3.70
(14)
4.07
(30)
3.20
(1)
4.05
(31)
4.96
(103)
4.56
(10)
4.92
(113)
4.82
(65)
3.30
(12)
4.58
(77)
4.91
(168)
3.87
(22)
4.79
(190)
5.42
(80)
5.11
(10)
5.39
(90)
5.01
(31)
3.87
(3)
4.91
(34)
5.31
(111)
4.82
(13)
5.26
(124)
5.99
(81)
4.98
(13)
5.85
(94)
5.87
(23)
6.60
(2)
5.93
(25)
5.97
(104)
5.20
(15)
5.87
(119)
4.71
(39)
4.30
(1)
4.69
(40)
6.32
(20)
4.10
(1)
6.22
(21)
5.25
(59)
4.20
(2)
5.22
(61)
4.34
(7)
2.60
(1)
4.12
(8)
5.60
(2)
0.0
(0)
5.60
(2)
4,62
<9V
2.60
(1)
4,«
(19)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
o:'o
(0)
0.0
(0)
5.25
(327)
4.81
(35)
5.21
(362)
5.13
(154)
3.77
(19)
4.98
(173)
5.21
(481)
4.45
(54)
5.14
(535)
L-15
-------
Table L-16.
SEATTLE
COHb: AGE, SEX, AND RACE FOR NONSMOKERS
MALE
FEMALE
MALE
Avr,
FEMALE
AGE
WHITE
. NONWHITE
RACES COMBINED
WHITE
NONWHITE
RACES COMBINED
WHITE
NONWHITE
RACES COMBINED
1-9
0
(0)
0
(0)
0
(0)
0
(0)
0
(0.)
0
(0)
0
(0)
0
(0)
0
(0)
10-19
1.41
(10)
1.60
(2)
1.44
(12)
1.40
(7)
0
(0)
1.40
(7)
1.41
(17)
1.60
(2)
1.43
(19)
20-29
1.75
(82)
1.12
(4)
1.73
(86)
1.60
(92)
1.50
(1)
1.60
(93)
1.67
(174)
1.20
(5)
1.66
(179)
30-39
1.82
(104)
1.70
(2)
1.82
(106)
1.53
(32)
1.40
(1)
1.53
(33)
1.75
(136)
1.60
(3)
1.75
(139)
40-49
1.75
(86)
1.10
(1)
1.74
(87)
1.57
(49)
1.60
(3)
1.57
(52)
1.68
(135)
1.47
(4)
1.67
(139)
50-59
1.65
(50)
2.10
(3)
1.68
(53)
1.41
(38)
0
(0)
1.41
(38)
1.55
(88)
2.10
(3)
1.57
(91)
60-69
1.70
(13)
0
(0)
1.70
(13)
1.98
(5)
0
(0)
1.98
(5)
1.78
(18)
0
(0)
1.78
(18)
ALL
70+
0
(0)
0
(0)
0
(0)
0
(0)
c
(0)
0
(0)
0
(0)
0
(0)
0
(0)
ACES
1.75
(345)
1.54
(12)
1.74
(357)
1.55
(223)
1.54
(5)
1.55
(228)
1.67
(568)
1.54
(17)
1.67
(585)
COHb: AGE, SEX, AND RACE FOR SMOKERS
MALE
FEMALE
MALE
AND
FEMALE
AGE
WHITE
NONWHITE
RACES COMBINED
WHITE
NONWHITE
RACES COMBINED
WHITE
NONWHITE
RACES COMBINED
1-9
0
.(0)
0
(0)
0
(0)
0
(0)
0
(0)
0
(0)
0
(0)
0
(0)
0
(0)
10-13
4.56
(5)
0.60
(1)
3.90
(6)
2.88
(5)
0
(0)
2.88
(5)
3.72
(10)
0.60
(1)
3.44
(11)
20-29
5.41
(5)
4.27
(4)
5.36
(88)
4.55
(52)
3.77
(3)
4.51
(55)
5.08
(136)
4.06
(7)
5.03
(143)
30-39
6.0
(84)
0
(0)
6.0
(84)
5.56
(14)
0
(0)
5.56
(14)
5.94
(98)
0
(0)
5.94
(98)
40-49
6.11
(84)
5.66
(7)
6.08
(91)
5.27
(24)
0
(0)
5.27
(24)
5.92
(108)
5.66
(7)
5.91
(115)
50-59
5.74
(43)
0
(0)
5.74
(43)
5.30
(18)
0
(0)
5.30
(18)
5.61
(61)
0
(0)
5.61
(61)
60-69
5.55
(8)
0
(0)
5.55
(8)
7.0
(1)
0
(0)
7.0
(1)
5.71
(9)
0
(0)
5.71
(9)
ALL
70+
0
(0)
0
(0)
0
(0)
0
(0)
0
(0)
0
(0)
0
(0)
0
(0)
0
(0)
ACES
5.80
(308) .
4.77
(12)
5.76
(320)
4.89
(114)
3.77
(3)
4.86
(117)
5.55
(422)
4.57
(15)
5.52
(437)
L-16
-------
Table L-17.
VERMONT- NEW HAMPSHIRE
COHb: AGE, SEX, AND RACE FOR NONSMOKERS
MALE
FEMALE
MALE
AND
FEMALE
AGE
WHITE
NONWHITE
RACES COMBINED
WHITE
NONWHITE
RACES COMBINED
WHITE
NONWHITE
RACES COMBINED
1-9
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
10-19
1.20
(163)
0.88
(5)
1.19
(168)
1.24
(23)
2.30
(1)
1.28
(24)
1.20
(186)
1.12
(6)
1.20
(192)
20-29
1.28
(231)
0.89
(8)
1.27
(239)
1.38
(80)
0.0
(0)
1.38
(80)
1.31
(311)
0.89
(8)
1.30
(319)
30-39
1.53
(90)
1.10
(1)
1.52
(91)
1.27
(61).
0.0
(0)
1.27
(61)
1.42
(151)
1.10
(1)
1.42
(152)
40-49
1.59
(95)
0.0
(0)
1.59
(95)
1.21
(57)
0.0
(0)
1.21
(57)
1.45
(152)
0.0
(0)
1.45
(152)
50-59
1.67
(68)
0.0
(0)
1.67
(68)
1.36
(53)
0.0
(0)
1.36
(53)
1.54
(121)
0.0
(0)
1.54
(121)
60-69
1.51
(8)
0.0
(0)
1.51
(8)
1.55
(15)
0.0
(0)
1.55
(15)
1.53
(23)
0.0
(0)
1.53
(23)
ALL
70+ | AGES
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
1.38
(655)
0.90
(14)
1.37
(669")
1.32
(289)
2.30
(1)
1.32
(290)
1.36
(944)
0 9Q
v/ • j y
(15)
1.36
(959)
COHb: AGE, SEX, AND RACE FOR SMOKERS
AGE j
MALE
FEMALE
MALE
AND
FEMALE
WHITE
NONWHITE
RACES COMBINED
WHITE
NONWHITE
RACES COMBINED
WHITE
NONWHITE
RACES COMBINED
ALL
1-9 10-19 20-29 30-39 40-49 50-59 60-69 70+ | AGES
0.0 2.88 3.99 5.32 5.06 4.81 5.42 0.0 4.44
(0) (46) (162) (72) (80) (41) (16) (0) (417)
0.0 0.0 2.90 1.30 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.83
<°> (0) (1) (2) (0) (0) (0) (0) (3)
0.0 2.88 3.98 5.21 5.06 4.81 5.42 0.0 4.42
(0) (46) (163) (74) (80) (41) (16) (0) (420)
0.0 3.87 4.37 5.32 5.58 5.29 3.70 0.0 4.86
(0) (13) (51) (34) (27) (17) (4) (0) (146)
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
(°) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0> (0) (0) (0)
0.0 3.87 4.37 5.32 5.58 5.29 3.70 0.0 4.86
(0) (13) (51) (34) (27) (17) f4> CO'* n/^
0.0 3.10 4.08 5.32 5.19 4.96 5.07 0.0 4.55
(0) (59) (213) (106) (107) (58) (20) (0) (563)
0.0 0.0 2.90 1.30 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.83
«» (0) (1) (2) (0) (0) (0) (0) (3)
0.0 3.10 4.08 5.24 5.19 4.96 5.07 0.0 4.53
(0) (59) (214) (108) (107) (58) (20) (0) (566)
L-17
-------
Table L-18.
WASHINGTON D. C.
COHb: AGE, SEX, AND RACE FOR NONSMOKERS
AGE
MALF
FEKAL2
MALE
AND
FE11ALE
WHITE
NONWHITE
RACES COMBINED
WHITE
NONWHITE
RACES COMBINED
WHITE
NONWHITE
RACES COMBINED
1-9
0
(0)
0
(0)
0
(0)
0
(0)
0
(0)
0
(0)
0
(0)
0
(0)
0
(0)
io-:i9
1.7:5
(9)
1.90
(1)
1.74
(10)
0.87
(77)
0.50
(2)
0.8'S
(79)
0.93
(86)
0.97
(3)
0.95
(89)
20-29
1.62
(200)
1.71
(17)
1.62
(217)
1.06
(108)
1.37
(11)
1.09
(119)
1.42
(308)
1.58
(28)
1.43
(336)
30-39
1.54
(130)
1.72
(14)
1.56
(144)
1.14
(28)
1.60
(3)
1.19
(31)
1.47
(158)
1.70
(17)
1.49
(175)
40-49
1.60
(103)
1.60
(4)
1.60
(107)
1.18
(33)
1.62
(4)
1.23
(37)
1.50
(136)
1.61
(8)
1.51
(144)
50-59
1.55
(48)
1.53
(3)
1.55
(51)
1.27
(37)
1.13
(3)
1.26
(40)
1.43
(85)
1.33
(6)
1.42
(91)
60-69
1.68
(13)
0
(0)
1.68
(13)
1.75
(2)
0
(0)
1.75
(2)
1.69
(15)
0
(0)
1.69
(151)
70+
0
(0)
0
(0)
0
(0)
0
(0)
0
(0)
0
(0)
0
(0)
0
(0)
0
(0)
ALL
AGES
1.59
(503)
1.69
(39)
1.60
(542)
1.06
(285)
4.85
(456)
1.08
(308)
1.40
(788)
1.56
(62)
1.41
(850)
AGE
COHb: AGE, SEX, AND RACE FOR SMOKERS
| 1-9 10-19 20-29 30-39 40-49 50-59 60-69 70+ |
ALL
AGES
MALE
FEMALE
MALE
^ND
FEMALE
WHITE
NONWHITE
: RACES COMBINED
WHITE
NONWHITE
RACES COMBINED
WHITE
NONWHITE
RACES COMBINED
0
(0)
0
(0)
0
(0)
0
(0)
0
(0)
0
(0)
0
(0)
0
(0)
0
.(0)
4.
-------
APPENDIX M.
Table M-l.
ANCHORAGE
RELATIONSHIP OF TOBACCO USE TO COHb
AGE GROUPS
SMOKING CATEGORIES
<1
.5 pack 1
2-3
^4
<1
.5 to 1 1
pack
2-3
*4
< 1
1 pack 1
2-3
?4
< 1
1.5 packs 1
2r3
>4
<1
2 packs 1
or more
2-3
£4
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
1-19
0.0
(0)
1.85
(4)
2.40
(4)
1.18
(9)
0.0
(0)
0.90
(2)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
3.75
(2)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
20-29
5.55
(2)
4.50
(3)
0.0
(0)
1.70
(1)
3.81
(7)
5.05
(2)
0.0
(0)
2.00
(1)
5.59
(9)
2.73
(3)
0.0
(0)
0.90
(1)
7.21
(7)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
8.60
(1)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
30-39
0.0
(0)
2.60
(1)
4.80
(2)
2.65
(2)
3.00
(3)
4.82
(5)
2.00
(2)
0.0
(0)
7.60
(7)
5.60
(1)
4.80
(2)
0.0
(0)
3.97
(4)
6.00
(1)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
5.57
(7)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
40-49
5.73
(3)
0.0
(0)
3.40
(2)
0.0
(0)
7.00
(1)
0.0 .
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
6.08
(12)
5.80
(1)
0.0
(0)
2.20
(2)
8.00
(1)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
8.33
(9)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
50-59
3.30
(1)
2.20
(2)
4.30
(2)
0.0
(0)
0.70
(1)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
6.13
(3)
4.20
(3)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
6.20
(3)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
60+
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
1.70
(2)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
'(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
ALL
AGES
5.27
(6)
2.79
(10)
3.17
(12)
1.47
(12)
3.62
(12)
4.00
(9)
2.00
(2)
2.00
(1)
6.13
(33)
4.02
(8)
4.80
(2)
1.77
(3)
6.20
(15)
6.00
(1)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
7.21
(17)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
INHALE
No
^•••MIM
•mum
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.60
(1)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
4.70
(2)
2.70
(2)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0,0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
000
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
Yes
aMvanMHi
•vnemBB
5.27
(6)
2.79
(10)
3.17
(12)
1.89
(7)
3.62
(12)
4.00
(9)
2.00
(2)
2.00
(1)
6.23
(31)
4.47
(6)
4.80
(2)
1.77
(3)
6.20
(15)
6.00
(1)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
7.21
(17)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
-------
CHICAGO
RELATIONSHIP OF TOBACCO USE TO COHb
. AGE GROUPS |
SMOKING CATEGORIES
<1
.5 pack 1
1 2-3
£4
<1
.5 to 1 1
pack
2-3
£4
< 1
1 pack 1
2-3
^4
< 1
1.5 packs 1
2-3
^4
< I
2 packs l
or more
2-3
£4
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
1-19
3.19
(8)
0.0
(0)
3.60
(4)
1.78
(5)
4.22
(4)
3.20
(1)
5.80
(1)
0.0
(0)
5.67
(8)
3.50
(11
1.80
(1)
0.0
(0)
4.70
(2)
0.0
(0)
2.20
(1)
0.0
(0)
2.60
(1)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
20-29
6.12
(17)
4.16
(5)
3.49
(8)
3.34
(9)
6.23
(20)
4.60
(3)
6.20
(3)
2.60
(2)
6.56
(44)
5.47
(8)
3.97
(3)
5.30
(1)
7.70
(5)
7.30
(1)
6.20
(1)
0.0
(0)
6.27
(7)
8.60
(1)
4.60
(1)
0.0
(0)
30-39
7.68
(13)
6.90
(11
2.80
(11
2.90
(9)
5.90
(131
5.74
(51
5.80
(3)
4.45
(2)
5.80
(24)
7.15
(6) .
4.22
(4)
0.0
(0)
7.49
(151
7.20
(1)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
8.59
(7)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
40-49
5.88
(6)
0.0
(0)
3.90
(2)
3.61
(7)
6.25
(11)
5.49
(10) .
5.40
(2)
2.40
(11
7.20
(27)
0.0
(0)
7.23 •
(3)
0.0
(0)
8.02
(ID
7.80
(1)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
8.39
(9)
6.80
(1)
0.0
(0)
0.0
u (0)
M-2
50-59
8.63
(3)
5.20
(2)
0.0
(0)
1.80
(1)
4.76
(5)
5.95
(2)
5.20
(1)
0.0
(0)
6.12
(i2>
7.90
(31
5.00
(1)
0.0
(0)
6.80
(4)
6.00
(1)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
6.50
(4)
0.0
(0)
5.90
(1)
0.0
(0)
60+
3.10
(1)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(01
0.0
(01
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
ALL
AGES
6.12
(48)
4.76
(8)
3.53
(15)
2.97
(31)
5.86
(53)
5.36
(21)
5.78
(10)
3.30
(5)
6.44
(115)
6.33
(18)
4.77
(12)
5.30
(1)
7.45
(37)
7.07
(4)
4.20
(2)
0.0
(0)
7.43
(28)
7.70
(2)
5.25
(2)
0.0
(0)
INHALE
No
4.76
(5)
2.65
(2)
3.60
(5)
3.66
(10)
5.83
(3)
0.0
(0)
6.10
(1)
3.20
u>
6.23
(6)
0.0
(0)
1.90
(11
0.0
(0)
8.40
(1)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(01
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
Yes
6.28
(43)
5.47
(6)
3.49
(io:
2.65
(21:
5.87
(50!
5.36
(21:
5.74
(9)
3.32
(4)
6.43
(10*
6.33
(18)
5.04
(ID
5.30
(1)
7.42
(36)
7.07
(4)
4.20
(2)
0.0
(0)
7.31
(29)
7.70
(2)
5.25
(2)
0.0
(0V
-------
Table M-3.
DENVER
RELATIONSHIP OF TOBACCO USE TO COHb
AGE GROUPS
SMOKING CATEGORIES
<1
.5 pack 1
2-3
>4
<1
.5 to 1 1
pack
2-3
>4
< 1
1 pack 1
2-3
5*4
< 1
1.5 packs 1
2r3
>4
<1
2 packs 1
or more
2-3
£4
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
1-19
3.87
(3)
5.70
(3)
4.83
(3)
3.60
(7)
5.55
(4)
6.60
(2)
2.75
(2)
2.65
(2)
4.97
(3)
5.00
(2)
4.50
(3)
5.30
(1)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
4.10
(1)
13.50
(I1*
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
20-29
5.03
(37)
5.32
(17)
4.78
(23)
3.43
(52)
5.91
(39)
5.77
(30)
5.28
(23)
3.76
(13)
6.05
(75)
5.55
(32)
4.73
(18)
5.12
(8)
6.75
(17)
4.42
(4)
4.50
(2)
5.70
(2)
6.19
(15)
7.24
(5)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
30-39
4.16
(ID
4.82
(12)
3.82
(13)
3.29
(16)
6.83
(21)
5.83
(20)
5.05
(4)
3.47
(3)
7.04
(50)
6.79
(13)
3.82
(6)
7.40
(1)
7.71
(24)
6.40
(1)
6.85
(2)
0.0
(0)
7.56
(14)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
4.30
(3)
11
40-49
7.18
(5)
5.80
(1)
3.97
(3)
3.46
(9)
6.70
(11)
5.99
(8)
4.60
(4)
1.70
(1)
7.09
(30)
6.78
(21)
4.83
(3)
6.40
(3)
8.11
(12)
7.80
(41
5.05
(2)
0.0
(0)
7.72
(25)
6.93
(6)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
^
50-59
5.53
(3)
3.20
(2)
8.60
(1)
2.70
(1)
6.80
(2)
6.36
(5)
6.40
(2)
4.00
(1)
6.86
(16)
7.44
(5)
4.35
(2)
0.0
(0)
7.05
(4)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
8.20
(4)
7.40
(H
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
60+
0.0
(0)
2.20
! ( ^
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
6.00
(3)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
o.o
(0)
ALL
AGES
5.02
(59)
5.00
(36)
4.53
(43)
3.41
(85)
6.28
(77)
5.89
(65)
5.09
(35)
3.51
(20)
6.56
(177)
6.24
(73)
4.52
(32)
5.61
(13)
7.46
(57)
6.14
(9)
5.47
(6)
5.70
(2)
7.26
(59)
7.59
(13)
0.0
(0)
4.30
(3)
INHALE
No Yes
5.25
(2)
2.80
(1)
5,40
(2)
3,33
(12)
4,60
(2)
3.87
(3)
0.0
(0)
1.00
(1)
4,90
(3)
5,77
(3)
3.40
(1)
0,0
(01
8,10
(11
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0,0
(01
0,0
(0)
0.0
(0)
5.01
(57:
5.06
(35;
4.48
(41:
3.43
(73;
6.31
(75:
5.99
(62;
5.09
(35;
3.56
(18-
6.59
(17<
6.26
(70:
4.56
(31)
5.79
(14:
7.45
(56;
6,14
(9)
5.47
(6)
5.70
(21
7.26
(59)
7.59
(13)
0.0
(0)
4.30
(31
-------
Table M-4.
DETROIT
RELATIONSHIP OF TOBACCO USE TO COHb
SMOKING
CATEGORIES
1-19
20-29
30-39
/ur o
40-49
50-59
604-
iUjlj
AGES
jl No
UVLiE,
VfS
<1 hour
.5 pack 1 hour
2-3 hour
>4 hour
< 1 hour
.5 to 1 1 hour
pack
2-3 hour
^4 hour
< 1 hour
1 pack 1 hour
2-3 hour
^ 4 hour
. < 1 hour
1.5 packs 1 hour
2. -3 hour
^ 4 hour
< 1 hour
2 packs l hour
or more
2-3 hour
^4 hour
1.20
(3)
2.30
(1)
4.10
(1)
0.90
(2^
4.:>b
(5)
6.40
(2)
0.0
(0)
1.80
(1)
4.57
(3)
5.10
(3)
5.40
(1)
0.0
(0)
4.00
(1)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
4.77
(12)
3.63
(7)
2.52
(5)
1.61
(7)
4.85
(26)
3.83
(9)
4.3:'.
(4)
2.80
(4)
6. If
(6C)
4.68
(20)
1.30
(1)
3.60
(1)
6.88
(26)
4.70
(7)
5.60
(1)
0.0
(0)
7.22
(12)
7.80
(1)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
5.57
(4)
2.80
(1)
4.2-8
(5)
2.23
(6)
5.96
(16)
5.21
(8)
5.25
(2)
2.90
(1)
6.85
(62)
6.81
(16)
6.60
(1)
0.0
(0)
7.06
(36)
4.80
(7)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
7.52
(31)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
4/90
(3)
3.75
(2)
1.80
(2)
2.20
(5)
5.89
(15)
4.26
(10)
3.88
(5)
4.65
(2)
6.55
(55)
5.79
(14)
5.00
(2)
3.30
(1)
6.82
(45)
7.20
(5)
8.20
(2)
0.0
(0)
8.03
(30)
7.43
(3)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
M-4
5.' 80
(3)
0.0
(0)
4.40
(1)
3.10
(3)
6.44
(9)
6.37
(4)
5.80
(3)
2.40
(1)
6.85
(19)
6.80
(5)
6.80
(1)
0.0
(0)
6.65
(10)
5.00
(3)
7.75
(2)
0.0
(0)
7.14
(7)
9.47
(3)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
BtiMB*. t * -MBIiHH* * 4, >*Jm^H»
0.0 4.6i
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
4.80
(1)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
4.40
(1)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
7.70
(1)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
(25)
3.45
(ID
3.29
(14)
2.03
(23)
5.51
(71)
4.76
(33)
4.61
(14)
3.07
(9)
6.51
(200)
5.74
(58)
5.02
(6)
3.45
(2)
6.87
(118)
5.30
(23)
7.50
(5)
0.0
(0)
7.64
(8i)
8.36
(7)
0.0
(0)
0.0
to)
—
rO(T4746-
(1) (24)
4.30 3.27
(2) (9)
1.40 3.44
(1) (13)
1.93 2.05
(3^ (20)
3.40 5.50
(1) (68)
3.95 4.85
(2) (30)
3.60 4.69
(1) (13)
0.0 3.07
(0) (9)
5.85 6.51
(6) (193'
0.0 5.74
(0) (57)
0.0 5.02
(0) (6)
0.0 3.77
(0) (3)
2.35 6.93
(2) (117
5.85 5.30
(2) (20)
0.0 7.50
(0) (5)
0.0 0.0
(0) (0)
8.60 7.61
(1) (81)
0.0 8.36
(0) (7)
0.0 0.0
(0) (0)
0.0 0.0
(0) (0)
-------
Table M-5.
HONOLULU
RELATIONSHIP OF TOBACCO USE TO COHb
AGE GROUPS
SMOKING CATEGORIES
<1
.5 pack 1
2-3
£4
<1
.5 to 1 1
pack
2-3
*4
X 1
^ JL
1 pack 1
2-3
»4
< 1
1.5 packs 1
2-3
>4
< 1
2 packs *
or more
2-3
£4
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
1-19
4.10
(1)
0.0
(0)
3.30
(1)
0.0
(0)
2.10
(1)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
Hrtui™
llwUL
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
20-29
4.04
(23)
4.61
(7)
3.00
(3)
2.39
(8)
4.83
(32)
4.39
(14)
4.00
(4)
2.17
(3)
5.33
(64)
4.42
(9)
4.32
(6)
2.20
(2)
6.04
(14)
0.0
. (0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
6.92
(10)
7.60
(1)
0.0
(0)
1.80
(1)
30-39
4.31
(18)
3.12
(6)
1.75
(2)
2.00
(4)
4.84
(16)
5.70
(3)
2.35
(2)
1.80
(1)
5.72
(50)
5.77
(9)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
6.41
(17)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
7.55
(12)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
I
40-49
2.95
(6)
2.97
(4)
0.0
(0)
3.60
(1)
4.99
(14)
6.35
(2)
4.90
(1)
0.0
(0)
6.22
(31)
5.82
(6)
4.13
(3)
2.20
(1)
6.24
(12)
0.0
(0)
5.60
(1)
4.70
(1)
7.80
(13)
0.0
(0)
8.10
(1)
0.0
(0)
A-5
50-59
4.80
(4)
2.20
(1)
3.20
(1)
3.70
(2)
4.55
(2)
3.75
(2)
5.00
(1)
0.0
(0)
5.83
(11)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
6.62
(4)
5.00
(1)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
7.16
(5)
0.0
(0)
3.00
(1)
0.0
(0)
60+
4.00
(1)
0.0
(0)
2.80
(1)
0.0
(0)
4.70
(1)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
4.80
(1)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
10.30
(1)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
ALL
AGES
4.07
(53)
3.62
(18)
2.72
(8)
2.54
(15)
4.82
(66)
4.70
(21)
3.82
(8)
2.07
(4)
5.67
(156)
5.26
(25)
4.26
(9)
2.20
(3)
6.36
(48)
5.00
(1)
5.60
(1)
4.70
(1)
7.42
(40)
7.60
(1)
5.55
(2)
1.80
(1)
INHALE
No
Mtmnm
1.70
(3)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
1.80
(1)
5.00
(2)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
3.35
(2)
0.0
(0)
3.20
(1)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
Yes
MKSnBBMMi
4.21
(50)
3.41
(17)
2.72
(8)
2.59
(14)
4.82
(63!
4.70
(21:
3.82
(8)
2.07
(4)
5.71
(155)
5.28
(26)
4.39
(8)
2.20
(3)
6.41
(49)
5.00
(1)
5.60
(1)
4.70
(1)
7.44
(41)
7.60
(1)
5.55
(2)
1.80
(1)
-------
Table M-6.;
HOUSTON
RELATIONSHIP OF TOBACCO USE TO COHb
SMOKING CATEGORIES
1-19 20-29
AGE GROUPS
30-39 40-49
50-59
60+
ALL
AGES
INHALE
No Yof?
< 1 hour
.5 pack L hour
2-3 hour
^4 hour
< 1 hour
.5 to 1 1 hour
pack
2-3 hour
^4 hour
< 1 hour
1 pack 1 hour
2-3 hour
54 hour
< 1 hour
1.5 packs 1 hour
2. -3 hour
^ 4 hour
0.0
(0)
3.30
(1)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
6.90
(1)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
•< \ hour !
2 packs l hour
or more
2-3 hour
^4 hour
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
1.60
(2)
0.0
(0)
3.15
(2)
0.90
(2)
0.0
(0)
2.20
(1)
0.0
(0)
2.3C
(1)
4.80
(2)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
4.40
(1)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
5.90
(1)
4.40
(1)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
7.80
(1)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
• (0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
6.60
(1)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
8.20
(1)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
M-6
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
1.60
(2)
3.30
(1)
3.15
(2)
0.90
(2)
4.40
(1)
2.20
(1)
0.0
CO)
2.30
(1)
5.17
(3)
4.40
(1)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
7.10
(3)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
8.20
(1)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
mB£T~zm*
1.60
(2)
3.30
(1)
3.15
(2)
0.90
(2)
4.40
(1)
2.20
CD
0.0
(0)
2.30
(1)
6.65
(2)
4.40
(1)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
7.10
(3)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0) .
3.20
(1)
3.0
(0)
3.0
(0)
).0
(0)
'
•Jill II I Hi
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0,0
(0)
0.0
CO)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
-------
Table M-7.
LOS ANGELES
RELATIONSHIP OF TOBACCO USE TO COHb
AGE GROUPS
SMOKING CATEGORIES
<1 hour
.5 pack 1 hour
2-3 hour
^4 hour
<1 hour
.5 eo i 1 hour
pack
2-3 hour
>4 hour
< 1 hour
1 pack 1 hour
2-3 hour
^4 hour
< 1 hour
IoS packs 1 hour
2. -3 hour
> 4 hour
< 1 hour
2 packs l houg
os mor©
2-3 hour
^4 hour
1-19
4.70
(4)
3.97
(6)
2.45
(2)
4.10
(4)
5.36
(11)
4.53
(3)
3.37
(3)
0.0
(0)
5.34
(19)
3.95
(2)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
5.05
(2)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
1.60
(1)
OoO
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
20-29
4.48
(46)
4.16
(20)
4.16
(23)
2.65
(32)
5.43
(87)
4.35
(21)
5.26
(13)
2.96
(7)
6.30
(170)
5.96
(14)
4.85
(8)
3.00
(3)
7.44
(52)
7.30
(2)
0.0
(0)
5.70
(1)
6.99
(27)
7o35
(2)
0.0
(0)
OoO
(0)
30-39
5.98
(18)
3.72
(9)
4.40
(10)
2.42
(28)
6.06
(45)
5.25
(15)
5.20
(11)
4.95
(2)
6.76
(119)
6.59
(23)
4.20
(4)
0.0
(0)
8.22
(56)
6.90
(3)
0.0
(0)
4.00
(1)
7.44
(59)
7.55
(4)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
40-49
5.46
(18)
3.70
(9)
3.23
(3)
2o37
(18)
6.18
(26)
5.77
(12)
4.17
(3)
3.90
(1)
7.13
(116)
5.57
.(25)
6.55
(2)
0.0
(0)
8.05
(58)
8.27
(3)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
8.46
(65)
8.60
(2)
7.90
(1)
0.0
(0)
50-59
5.95
(11)
3.78
(6)
4.49
(7)
2.32
(10)
5o85
(18)
5.93
(12)
3.72
(5)
7.60
(1)
7.10
(56)
6.17
(10)
6.30
(1)
0.0
(0)
7.07
(32)
7.15
(2)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
8.17
(42)
6.60
(2)
0.0
(0)
OoO
(0)
60+
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
6.20
(2)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
7.67
(7)
5.95
(2)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
OoO
(0)
0.0
(0)
4oOO
(1)
0.0
(0)
5.70
(1)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
ALL
AGES
5.12
(97)
3.93
(50)
4.12
(45)
2.55
(92)
5.73
(189)
5.15
(63)
4.77
(35)
3.83
(11)
6.69
(487)
6.00
(76)
5?00
(15)
3.00
(3)
7.75
(200)
7.44
(10)
4.00
(1)
4.85
(2)
7.84
(195)
7.53
(10)
7.90
(1)
0.0
(0)
INHALE
No Yes
5.79 5.07
(9) (87)
3.42 3.98
(4) (46)
3.90 4.14
(3) (42)
1.89 2.69
(15) (76)
6.30 5.69
(11) (177;
5.35 5.06
(4) (58)
10.20 4.61
(1) (34)
0.0 3.83
(0) (11)
6.51 6.70
(13) (472
4.25 6.12
(4) (71)
4.50 5.04
(1) (14)
0.0 3.00
(0) (3)
8.65 7.76
(2) (197
OoO 7.44
(0) (10)
4.00 0.0
(1) (0)
0.0 4.85
(0) (2)
5.50 7.91
(5) (189
6.90 7.60
(1) (9)
0.0 7.90
(0) (1)
0.0 0.0
(0) (0)
M-7
-------
Table M-8.
MIAMI
RELATIONSHIP OF TOBACCO USE TO COHb
AGE GROUPS
SMOKING CATEGORIES
"" <1
.5 pack 1
2-3
^4
<1
.5 to 1 1
pack
2-3
£4
< 1
1 pack 1
2-3
^4
< 1
1.5 packs 1
2r3
^4
< i
2 packs l
or more
2-3
£4
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
1-19
3.42
(4)
3.30
(2)
3.67
(3)
1.37
(3)
3.51
(7)
3.30
(2)
2.70
(1)
3.20
(1)
3.83
(6)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
4.60
(IV
4.45
(2)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
5.53
(3)
0.0
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
20-29
3.82
(32)
2.63
(9)
5.19
(11)
2.66
(27)
5.07
(45)
4.10
(23>
4.90
(6)
2.82
(4)
5.58
(89)
4.35
(19)
4.63
(11)
3.42
(6)
5.83
(27)
4.70
(4>
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
5.33
(26)
4.20
(1)
0.0
(0)
3.10
(1)
30-39
3.47
(6)
4.79
(7)
3.24
(5)
1.71
(7)
6.57
(13)
4.12
(4)
9.07
(4)
1.80
(2)
6.16
(60)
5.06
(9)
5.33
(3)
7.60
(1)
6.49
(20)
8.55
(2)
0.0
(O'*
2.70'
(n
7.59
(12)
4.97
(3)
5.40
(1)
0.0
(0)
40-49
4.72
(4)
1.10
(1)
7.20
(1)
2.73
(3)
5.26
(9)
4.43
(7)
4.27
(3)
5.80
(1)
5.83
(34)
6.96
(10)-
5.15
(2)
1.70
(1)
6.34
(16)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
7.23
(28)
5.90
(4)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
50-59
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
4.40
(2)
6.40
(2)
0.0
(0)
3.50
(2)
2.40
(1)
5.20
(21)
5.52
(4)
3.40
(1)
0.0
(0)
6.30
(5)
O.Q
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
7.31
(15)
6.70
(1)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
60+
••MMtKmw
o.o
(0)
0.0
(0)
o.o
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
4.00
(1)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0^
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
o.o
(0">
0.0
(0)
7.80
(1)
0.0
(0)
0.0
«r
0.0
(0)
M-8
ALL
AGES
3.82
(46)
3.42
(19)
4.57
(20)
2.50
(42)
5.24
(76)
4.12
(36)
5.51
(16)
2.92
(9)
5.69
(211)
5.23
(42)
4.74
(17)
3.82
(9)
6.13
(70)
5.98
(6
0.0
(0)
2.70
(1)
6.66
(85)
5.49
(9)
5.40
(1)
3.10
(I)
INHALE
No
3.10
(3)
6.70
(2)
10.70
(2)
3.74
(5)
2.65
(2)
2.10
(2)
7.55
(2)
0.0
(0)
6.12
(4)
3.70
(2)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
4.33
(3)
0.0
(0>
0.0
(0)
0.0
(01
0.0
(0)
8.50
(1)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(01
Yes
3.93
(42;
3.19
(16;
3.81
(17;
2.37
(36}
5.31
(74)
4.24
(34)
5.48
(13)
2.97
(8)
5.70
(204
5.30
(39)
4.74
(17)
3.82
(9)
6.21
(67)
5.98
(6)
0.0
(0)
2.70
(1)
6.66
(85)
5.11
(8)
5.40
(!">
3.10
(1)
-------
Table M-9.
MILWAUKEE
RELATIONSHIP OF TOBACCO USE TO COHb
AGE GROUPS
SMOKING CATEGORIES
<1
<>5 pack 1
2-3
>4
4
<1
•a
2 packs
©£• SOS®
2-3
M
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
)
hour
hour
hour
hour
hous
hour
1-19
3.21
(16)
3..15
(6)
3.83
(9)
1.78
(20)
3.58
(17)
3.88
(6)
2.90
(1)
1.95
(12)
4.92
(24)
3,74
(5)
3.54
(5)
1.62
(4)
4,40
(3)
6.35
(2)
0,0
(0)
0.0
(0)
4=72
(4)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
20-29
4.10
(21)
2»27
(9)
3.42
(19)
1.42
(44)
4.68
(39)
3.81
(22)
3.54
(10)
1.47
(9)
5.45
(96)
4.50
(14)
3.82
(8)
2.42
(9)
6.37
(24)
4.73
(3)
2.10
(1)
2.90
(2)
7.12
(16)
6.90
(2)
0.0
(0)
Io70
(1)
30-39
5.33
(13)
2.79
(8)
2.62
(14)
1.77
(32)
5.23
(32)
4.77
(10)
4.24
(7)
2.66
(5)
5.80
(75)
4.83
(13)
3.57
(3)
3.45
(4)
6.84
(34)
6.40
(2)
6.75
(2)
0.0
(0)
6.52
(29)
1.80
(I)
6.75
(2)
0.0
(0)
40-49
4.28
(10)
2.58
(6)
3.66
(11)
1.70
(29)
5.53
(41)
4.71
(18)
4.06
(14)
2.70
(8)
6.12
(70)
7.43
(16)
4.42
(12)
2.13
(3)
7.52
(29)
8.02
(5)
5.05
(2)
2.60
(1)
7.20
(32)
5..04
(5)
0.0
(0)
4.43
(3)
50-59
3.98
(14)
4.25
(10)
2.80
(12)
2.31
(24)
4.69
(40)
3.88
(15)
3.32
(13)
2.67
(15)
6.01
(48)
5.56
(18)
4.79
(11)
8.90
(3)
4.99
(11)
4.80
(2)
5.65
(2)
0.0
(0)
6.61
(9)
2.95
(2)
0.0
(0)
1.70
(1)
60+
3.75
(17)
2.64
(9)
3.33
(15)
1.89
(25)
4.01
(17)
3.89
(11)
3.82
(13)
1.97
(7)
4.40
(44)
4.54
(18)
3.70
(6)
2.95
(4)
5.78
(5)
5.72
(5)
5.50
(2)
2.40
(2)
3.80
(9)
0.0
(0)
4.05
(2)
0.0
(0)
ALL
AGES
4.05
(91)
2.99
(48)
3.25
(80)
1.76
(174)
4.80
(186)
4.15
(82)
3.75
(58)
2.24
(56)
5.56
(357)
5.30
(84)
4.16
(45)
3.22
(27)
6.61
(106)
6.21
(19)
5.33
(9)
2.64
(5)
>.53
(99)
k.67
(10)
5o40
(4)
L 34
(5)
INHALE
No Yes
3.51 4.10
(7) (84)
2.84 3.05
(7) (40)
2.65 3.43
(19) (62)
1.83 1.73
(50) (124)
3.35 4.87
(12) (171)
3.17 4.26
(8) (74)
2.56 3.97
(9) (49)
2.67 2.22
(6) (49)
6.12 5.56
(5) (353)
4.37 5.37
(6) (78)
3.60 4.21
(4) (41)
2.65 3.27
(2) (25)
6.10 6.64
(6) (100)
5.40 6.26
(1) (18)
5.00 5.37
(1) (8)
0.0 2.64
(0) (5)
4.72 6.61
(4) (94)
3.60 4.79
(1) (9)
0.0 5.40
(0) (4)
3.40 3.32
(1) (4)
M-9
-------
Table M-10.
NEW ORLEANS
RELATIONSHIP OF TOBACCO USE TO COHb
SMOKING CATEGORIES
1-19 20-29
AGE GROUPS
30-39 40-49
50-59
60+
ALL
AGES
INHALE
No Yos
4
<1
.5 to 1 1
pack
2-3
•
3*4
< 1
- pack 1
2-3
2*4
< 1
1.5 packs 1
2r3
>4
< 1
2 packs
or more
2-3
£4
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
5.34
(7)
5.35
(2)
0.0
(0)
2.70
(4)
4.63
(6)
4.20
(2)
5.20
(1)
4.10
(2)
5.58
(6)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
3.20
(1)
5.80
(1)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
3.10
(1)
4.77
(3)
0.0
(0)
4.70
(1)
0.0
(0)
5.24
(11)
5.19
(8)
4.82
(9)
3.75
(15)
5.70
(25)
5.39
Ufr)
3.67
(3)
4.10
(3)
5.83
(33)
5.7L
(17)
5.67
(7)
6.45
(2)
5.5:2
(6)
5-5.5
(2)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
5.83
(11)
6.17
(3>
0.0
(0)
0.0
(o;>
6.17
(3)
6.55
(2)
2.45
(2)
6.37
(4)
5.56
(10)
6.90
(3)
6.63
(7)
6.05
(2)
6.11
(18)
5.39
(8)
9.67
(3)
0.0
(0)
8.79
(7)
0.0
(0)
6.90
(2)
0.0
(0)
6.92
(12)
5.83
(3)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
7.00
(2)
0.0
(0)
3.20
(1)
2.50
(4)
3.65
(4)
5.77
(3).
3.90
(1)
6.40
(1)
5.68
(10)
0.0
(0)
6.83"
(3)
1.80
(1)
2.90
(1)
5.70
(1)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
7.45
(4)
0.0
(0)
6.60
(1)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
6.25
(2)
2.40
(3)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
4.75
(2)
0.0
(0)
6.10
(2)
5.00
(2)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
5.70
(2)
4.20
(1)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0 5.54
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
4.20
(1)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(Q)
(23)
5.44
(12)
4.57
(14)
3.66
(30)
5.32
(46)
5.54
(22)
5.43
(14)
4.87
(8)
5.89
(69)
5.56
(27)
6.86
(13)
4.47
(4)
6.75
(17)
5.25
(4)
6.90
(2)
3.10
(1)
6.38
(30)
6.00
(6)
5.65
(2)
0.0
(0)
M-10
'2 "so"'
(2)
4.60
(1)
0.0
(0)
2.18
(6)
2.97
(3)
0.0
(0)
5.70
(2)
0.0
(0)
4.60
(2)
3.40
(1)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
4.00
(1)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
5.10
(3)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
5.83
(21)
5.46
(10)
4.57
(14)
4.03
(24)
5.48
(43)
5.54
(22)
5.38
(12)
4.87
(8)
5.93
(67)
5.65
(26)
6.86
(13)
4.47
(4)
6.92
(16)
5.25
(4)
6.90
(2)
3.10
(1)
6.52
(27)
6.00
(6)
5.65
(2)
0.0
(0)
-------
Table M-ll.
NEW YORK
RELATIONSHIP OF TOBACCO USE TO COHb
AGE GROUPS
SMOKING CATEGORIES
<1
.5 pack 1
2-3
5>4
<1
.5 to 1 1
pack
2-3
*4
< 1
1 pack 1
2-3
»4
< 1
1.5 packs 1
2r3
>4
<1
2 packs *
or more
2-3
»4
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
1-19
3.35
(11)
2.15
(6)
2.42
(9)
1.35
(10)
4.04
(13)
3.77
(11)
3.27
(7)
1.10
(1)
3.90
(26)
4.66
(5)
3.65
(4)
2.30
(1)
4.78
(9)
4.65
(2)
3.30
(1)
0.0
(0)
5.62
(6)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
20-29
3.62
(38)
2.87
(21)
2.70
(28)
1.82
(38)
4.20
(52)
3.91
(19)
2.95
(16)
1.84
(8)
5.35
(155)
4.37
(48)
4.33
(19)
4.10
(1)
6.38
(75)
5.41
(20)
5.55
(4)
0.0
(0)
6.36
(44)
7.01
(7)
4.83
(3)
0.0
(0)
30-39
4.19
(14)
4.66
(5)
2.13
(3)
2.11
(29)
5.13
(36)
4.62
(18)
3.88
(5)
1.75
(4)
5.78
(91)
4.87
(40)
4.27
(9)
4.10
(4)
7.09
(56)
5.95
(ID
7.85
(4)
0.50
(1)
6.81
(48)
7.17
(4)
4.40
(2)
0.0
(0)
40-49
4.00
(24)
3.08
(10)
2.47
(ID
1.79
(29)
4.63
(28)
5.39
(15)
4.11
(8)
2.55
(2)
6.12
(91)
4.87
(26)
4.91
(14)
2.50
(1)
6.51
(42)
6.66
(18)
7.87
(3)
0.0
(0)
7.07
(54)
5.66
(7)
5.64
(5)
0.0
(0)
50-59
4.07
(6)
3.80
(5)
3.56
(9)
2.44
(18)
5.91
(8)
3.61
(12)
3.87
(6)
3.28
(6)
5.87
(33)
5.15
(12)
5.63
(9)
4.03
(3)
6.72
(19)
4.92
(9)
4.15
(2)
3.55
(2)
7.21
(31)
5.10
(3)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
60+
3.20
(1)
3.30
(1)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
4.70
(2)
0.0
(0)
4.20
(1)
0.0
(0)
6.67
(4)
4.72
(4)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
6.00
(1)
0.0
(0)
8.20
(1)
0.0
CO)
7.77
(3)
0.0
(0)
4.50
(1)
0.0
(0)
ALL
AGES
3.79
(94)
3.11
(48)
2.72
(60)
1.93
(124)
4.62
(139)
4.31
(75)
3.48
(43)
2.27
(21)
5.58
(400)
4.71
(135)
4.63
(55)
3.74
(10)
6.56
(202)
5.79
(60)
6.47
(15)
2.53
(3)
6.82
(186)
6.32
(21)
5.09
(11)
0.0
(0)
INHALE
No
•HJBnptBMI
3.20
(5)
2.42
(4)
2.04
(7)
1.83
(21)
4.99
(14)
3.33
(3)
2.70
(5)
2.20
(1)
5.22
(15)
3.22
(5)
4.40
(4)
0.0
(0)
8.75
(4)
2.20
(1)
2.40
(1)
0.0
(0)
5^8
(5)
4.70
(1)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
Yes
•0HBM
3.83
(88)
3.18
(44)
2.81
(53)
1.95
(100)
4.59
(122)
4.27
(70)
3.59
(38)
2.27
(20)
5.62
(380)
4.77
(127)
4.65
(51)
3.74
(10)
6.54
(195)
5.85
(59)
6.76
(14)
2.53
(3)
6.85
(176)
6.40
(20)
5.09
(11)
0.0
(0)
M-n
-------
Table M-12.
PHOENIX
RELATIONSHIP OF TOBACCO USE TO COHb
AGE GROUPS
SMOKING CATEGORIES
4
< 1
1.5 packs 1
2.-3
^ b.
-• t
< 1
2 packs l
or more
2-3
£4
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
Vk f** < «M
nout
hour
hour
hour
hour
1-19
3.93
(3)
4.10
(1)
1.80
(1)
0.0
(0)
1.10
(1)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
2.40
(2)
1.10
(1)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
20-29
3.26
(5)
2.65
(2)
0.0
(0)
2.57
(6)
3.00
(9)
3.73
(3)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
4.42
(Hi)
1.60
(1)
2.60
(1)
0.70
(1)
4.90
(1)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
5.10
(1)
5.10
(1)
1.40
(1)
30-39
• •••t '^••a
5.70
(1)
0.0
(0)
0.60
(1)
1.90
(3)
3.36
(5)
3.97
(3)
7.70
(1)
4.30
(1)
5.80
(19)
3.45
(2)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
5.55
(10)
1.10
(1)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
7.67
(3)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
M_l
40-49
1.00
(2)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
1.75
(2)
7.10
(3)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
1.00
(1)
5.87
(11)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
2.40
(1)
0.0
(0)
3.40
(1)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
5.80
(6)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
9
50-59
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
1.30
(1)
0.0
(0)
7.50
(1)
3.30
(1)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
4.75
(4)
0.0
(0)
6.90
(1)
0.0
(0)
6.20
(3)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
4.05
(2)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
1.10
(1)
60+
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
4.60
(1)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
ALL
ACES
3.25
(11)
3.13
(3)
1.23
(3)
2.24
(11)
3.88
(19)
3.77
(7)
7.70
(1)
2.52
(4)
5.21
(51)
2.83
(3)
4.75
(2)
1.55
(2)
5.64
(14)
2.25
(2)
o
-------
Table M-13.
ST. LOUIS
RELATIONSHIP OF TOBACCO USE TO COHb
AGE CROUPS
SMOKING CATEGORIES
<1
.5 pack 1
2-3
£4
<1
.5 to 1 1
pack
2-3
£4
< 1
1 pack 1
2-3
>4
< 1
1.5 packs 1
2r3
^4
<1
2 packs l
or more
2-3
£4
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
houK
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
1-19
4.00
(1).
0.0
(0)
5.40
(1)
4.00
(1)
0.0
(P)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
3.90
(4)
4.20
(2)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
20-29
3.61
(8)
2.98
(6)
4.02
(5)
2.05
(2)
3.95
(8)
3.32
(5)
3.00
(2)
4.10
(1)
5.84
(36)
5.27
(7)
9.00
(1)
0.0
(0)
6.73
(9)
6,25
(2)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
6.21
(7)
4.80
(1)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
30-39
2.25
(2)
3.50
(2)
2.53
(3)
1.77
(7)
5.30
(9)
3.95
(2)
3.55
(2)
4.10
(1)
6.18
(29)
6.00
(4)
3.30
(2)
5.20
(1)
7.03
(15)
6.50
(1)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
7.49
(13)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
40-49
4.50
(3)
5.10
(2^
5.60
(1)
2.07
(4)
6.10
(3)
5.00
(2)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
6.69
(29)
5.91
(7)
5.65
(2)
0.0
(0)
6.85
(11)
0.0
(0)
2.70
(1)
0.0
(0)
6.30
(11)
9.10
(3)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
50-59
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
2.63
(31
5.27
(4)
2.40
(1)
2.00
(1)
0.0
(0)
6.06
(13)
6.89
(7)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
6.86
(5)
0.0
(0)
4.20
(1)
0.0
(0)
5.27
(3)
5.40
(1)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
60+
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
6.80
(^
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
5.30
(3)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
ALL || INHALE
AGES I) No
3.64
(14)
3.51
(10)
3.87
(10)
2.16
(17)
5.02
(25)
3.69
(101
3.02
(5^
4.10
(2)
6.09
(114)
5.89
(27)
5.38
(5)
5.20
(1)
6.89
(40)
6.33
(3)
3.45
(2)
0.0
(0)
6.65
(34)
7.50
(5)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
6.50
(1^
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
2.00
(1)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(01
2.00
(1)
0.0
(0)
4.40
(2)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
Yes
•••••MB
3.42
(13
3.59
(9)
3.87
(10
2.20
(15
5.11
(24
3.69
(10
3.27
(4)
4.10
(2)
6.12
(112
5.89
(27)
5.38
(5)
5.20
(1)
6.89
(40)
6.33
(3)
3.45
(2)
0.0
(0)
6.56
(33)
7.50
(5)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
M-13
-------
Table M-14.
SALT LAKE CITY
RELATIONSHIP OF TOBACCO USE TO COHb
AGE GROUPS
SMOKING CATEGORIES
<1 hour
.5 pack 1 hour
2-3 hour
^4 hour
< 1 hour
.5 to 1 1 hour
pack
2-3 hour
.
^4 hour
< 1 hour
1 pack 1 hour
'
2-3 hour
>4 hour
< 1 hour
1.5 packs 1 hour
2. -3 hour
> 4 hour
< 1 hour
2 packs l hour
or more
2-3 hour
£4 hour
1-19
4.30
(1)
0.0
(0)
2.25
(2)
2.10
(4)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
6.80
(1)
0.0
(0)
4.65
(2^
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
5.90
(1)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
20-29
3.25
(2)
0.0
(0)
3.17
(4)
2.47
(4)
5.57
(3)
3.30
(4)
4.78
(5)
0.0
(0)
5.60
(15)
5.70
(7)
4.85
(4)
0.0
(0)
4.80
(2"\
5.55
(2)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
30-39
4.08
(5)
2.62
(4)
4.47
(3)
6.20
(1)
8.50
(2-)
6.15
(2)
6.00
(1)
2.50
(2)
5.72
(6)
6.05
(4)
5.66
(5)
0.0
(0)
10.00
(1)
0.0
(0)
4.30
(1)
0.0
(0)
8.40
(3)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
40-49
6.20
(1)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
5.50
(1)
5.35
(2)
5.40
(1).
3.60
(1)
0.0
(0)
6.20
(8)
9.20
(1)
4.00
(2)
0.0
(0)
7.52
(4)
6.70
(3)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
7.80
(3)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
50-59
6.00
(1)
0.0
(0)
4.20
(1)
3.77
(4)
0,0
(0)
7.70
(1)
6.70
(U
0.0
(0)
6.78
(5)
5.63
(3)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
9.35
(2)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
9.90
(1)
10.70
(1)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
60+
•••BiK^aaK
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
ALL
AGES
HB9BC5T23HB1
4.34
(10)
2.62
(4)
3.48
(10)
3.22
(14)
0.0 6.34
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(V
(7^
4.82
(8)
5.02
(8)
2.50
(2)
5.96
(35)
6.01
(15)
5.00
(131*
0.0
(0)
7.60
(9)
6.24
(5)
4.30
(1)
0.0
(0)
8.05
(8)
10.70
(1)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
INHALE
No Yes
3.70 4.41
(n (9)
1.00 3.17
(1) (3)
0.0 3.48
(0) (10)
2.13 3.52
(3) (11)
0.0 6.34
(0) (7)
0.0 4.82
(0) (8)
0.0 5.02
(0) (8)
0.0 2.50
(0) (2)
0.0 5.96
(0) (35)
0.0 6.17
(0) (14)
0.0 5.00
(V (13)
0.0 0.0
(0) (0)
0.0 7.60
(0) (9)
0.0 6.24
(0) (5)
0.0 4.30
(0) (1)
0.0 OlO
(0V (0>
0.0 8.05
(0) (8)
0.0 10.70
(0) (1)
0.0 0.0
(0) (0)
0.0 0.0
(0) (0)
M-14
-------
Table M-15.
SAN FRANCISCO
RELATIONSHIP
OF TOBACCO
USE TO
AGE GROUPS
SMOKING CATEGORIES
4
< I
1 pack 1
2-3
>4
< 1
1.5 packs 1
2r3
>4
<1
2 packs *
or more
2-3
£4
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
1-19
2.07
W
4.30
(2)
0.0
(0)
2.25
(2)
3.96
(5)
4.60
(1)
4.30
(1)
0.0
(0)
4.39
(9)
6.70
(1)
0.0
(0)
1.50
(1)
0.0
(0)
6.20
(1)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
4.80
(1)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
20-29
4.60
(16)
1.70
(1)
3.20
(5)
2.09
(17)
4.45
(20)
3.91
(7)
4.04
(8)
2.00
(1)
5.47
(41)
6.25
(11)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
7.01
(17)
6.07
(3)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
8.21
(9)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
30-39
3.76
(9)
1.85
(2^
4.06
(5)
1.84
(7)
5.41
(8)
5.60
(4)
0.0
CO)
2.57
(3)
6.02
(20)
6.67
(3)
0..0
(0)
0.0
(0)
6.84
(18)
8.30
(1)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
7.29
(14)
5.90
CD
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
11
40-49
4.. 70
(1)
10.00
(1)
2.30
(2)
1.90
(3)
5.73
(9)
4.97
(4)
0.0
CO)
4.80
(1)
6.61
(32)
7.95
(4)
4.60
CD
0.0
(0)
6.82
(10)
3.57
(3)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
7.62
(16)
2.70
(1)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
i r
50-. 59
4.00
(4)
5.65
(2)
1.30
(1)
1.4.7
(3)
4.46
(5)
6.70
(2)
4.40
(2)
0.0
(0)
5.88
(12)
6.10
(1)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
7.63
(7)
7.90
(1)
0.0
(0)
0.0
<0)
7.07
(3)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
COHb
ALL INHALE
60+
AGES
0.0 4.07
(0)
5.60
(1)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
5.60
(1)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(Q)
8.35
(2)
0.0
CO)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
3.25
(2)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
(33)
4.54
(9)
3.25
(13)
1.97
(32>
4.81
(47)
4.91
(19)
4.13
(ID
2.90
(5)
5.89
(116)
6.67
(20)
4.60
(1)
1.50
(1)
7.00
(52)
5.70
(9)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
7.34
(45)
4.30
(2)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
No Yes
~3.60 4.07
(2) (30)
3.10 5.27
(3) (6)
3.25 3.25
(2) (11)
2.25 1.94
(2) (27)
4.10 4.82
(1) (46)
0.0 4.91
(0) (19)
1.80 4.11
(1) (8)
0.0 2.90
(0) (5)
6.00 5.89
(1) (115
3.70 6.83
(1) (19)
0.0 4.60
(0) (1)
0.0 0.0
(0) (0.)
0.0 7.01
(0) (50)
2.40 6.83
(1) (7)
0.0 0.0
(0) (0)
0.0 0.0
(0) (0)
6.94 7.40
(5) (40)
0.0 4.30
(0) (2)
0.0 0.0
(0) (0)
0.0 0.0
(0) (0)
-------
Table M-16.
SEATTLE
RELATIONSHIP OF TOBACCO USE TO COHb
AGE GROUPS
SMOKING CATEGORIES
<1 hour
.5 pack 1 hour
2-3 hour
^4 hour
< 1 hour
.5 to 1 1 hour
pack
2-3 hour
^4 hour
< 1 hour
1 pack 1 hour
2-3 hour
>4 hour
< 1 hour
1.5 packs 1 hour
2r3 hour
^ 4 hour
< 1 hour
2 packs l hour
or more
2-3 hour
£4 hour
1-19
2.95
(2)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
1.30
(3)
4.63
(3)
3.40
(1)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
5.35
(2)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
20-29
4.48
(18)
3.25
(2)
2.78
(6)
2.67
(9)
5.00
(25)
4.48
(5)
4.43
(6)
3.60
(1)
6.74
(28)
4.3!)
(6)
6.87
(3)
4.10
(1)
6.71
(9)
0.0
(0)
2. 20
(1)
0.0
(0)
5.65
(8)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
30-39
4.36
(7)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
2.82
(4)
5.16
(7)
5.70
(3)
10.20
(1)
2.80
(1)
6.73
(24)
6.32-
(5)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(n)
6.66
(9)
5.75
(2)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
8.28
(13)
4.70
(1)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
40-49
3.70
(3)
2.70
(1)
4.65
(2)
1.50
(1)
5.51
(7)
6.22 .
(8)
3.83
(3)
1.70
(1)
6.77
(25)
6.60
(11)
5.30
(1)
0.0
(0)
7.11
(15)
4.70
(1)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
7.76
(7)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
50-59
1.55
(2)
3.20
(1)
1.90
(3)
3.93
(3)
5.10
(4)
5.25
(2)
7.07
(3)
3.70
(2)
5.52
(8)
5.00
(2)
4.30
(2)
0.0
(0)
8.14
(5)
8.87
(3)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
7.34
(7)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
j ALL
60+ 1 AGES
0.0 4.10
(0)
2.80
(1)
0.0
(0)
2.50
(1)
7.00
(1)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
7.70
(1)
6.90
(1)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
6.75
(2)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
10.00
(1)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
(32)
3.04
(5)
2.88
(ID
2.62
(21)
5.12
(48)
5.43
(19)
5.35
(13)
3.10
(5)
6.62
(88)
5.88
(25)
5.75
(6)
4.10
(1)
7.03
(40)
7.13
(6)
2.20
(1)
0.0
(0)
7.46
(36)
4.70
(1)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
INHALE
No
TTo's"
(6)
3.00
(2)
2.00
(1)
1.50
(1)
0.0
(0)
7.00
(1)
7.65
(2)
4.60
(1)
0.0
(0)
5.30
(1)
4.20
(1)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
4.30
(1)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
Vos
TTsV
(26
3.07
(3)
2.97
(10
2.67
(20
5.12
(48)
5.34
(18)
4.93
(11)
2.72
(4)
6.62
(88)
5.91
(24)
6.06
(5)
4.10
(1)
7.03
(40)
7.13
(6)
2.20
(1)
0.0
(0)
7.60
(34)
4.70
(1)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
M-16
-------
Table M-17.
VERMONT - NEW HAMPSHIRE
RELATIONSHIP
OF TOBACCO
USE TO
COHb
AGE GROUPS
SMOKING CATEGORIES
<1
.5 pack 1
2-3
»4
<1
.5 to 1 1
pack
2-3
*4
< 1
1 pack 1
2-3
£4
< 1
1.5 packs 1
2r3
J&4
<1
2 packs l
or more
2-3
>4
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
1-19
3.77
(3)
2.65
(4)
2.67
(4)
1.53
(10)
6.10
(3)
4.15
(2)
3.23
(3)
2.20
(1)
4.47
(8)
6.17
(3)
2.55
(2)
0.0
(0)
8.30
(1)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
20-29
4.14
(7)
3.27
(6)
1.97
(7)
1.71
(19)
4.78
(20)
4.90
(10)
4.10
(10)
2.50
(3)
5.20
(44)
3.78
(9)
4.31
(8)
3.00
(1)
6.53
(15)
6.60
(1)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
5.73
(7)
4.85
(2)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0>
30-39
7.20
(2)
4.42
(4)
3.03
(3)
1.67
(7)
5.66
X9)
3.87
(3^
5.00
<2>
0.0
(0)
6.29
(22)
8.28
(6)
3.30
(1)
0.0
(0)
7.25
(4)
5.85
(4)
3.40
(1)
0.0
(0)
8.10
(10)
5.30
(2>
0.0
(0)
0.0
<0> H-l
40-49
8.50
(1)
1.70
(2)
0.0
(0)
1.89
(10)
5.15
(2)
5.20
(1)
4.4t)
(1)
0.0
(0)
6.70
(23)
6.37
(6)
4.25
(2)
0.0
(0)
6.94
(14)
10.40
(1)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
6.89
(11)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
7(o,
50-59
2.30
(2)
3.93
(3)
0.0
(0)
1.50
(2)
7.40
(1)
2.25
(2)
6.20
(2)
1.70
(1)
5.91
(9)
5.54
(5)
6.15
(2)
2.60
(1)
7.60
(5)
0.0
(0)
8.10
(1)
0.0
(0)
5.80
(7)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
60+
2.20
(1)
0.0
(0)
3.90
(1)
2.00
(1)
8.00
(1)
0.0
(0)
5.00
(1)
0.0
(0)
4.80
(2)
5.00
(3)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
5.50
(2)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
6.40
(1)
0.0
(0)
0,0
(0)
ALL
AGES
4.37
(16)
3.32
(19)
2.50
(15)
1.70
(49)
5.29
(36)
4.37
(18)
4.34
(19)
2.28
(5)
5.74
(108)
5.72
(32)
4.25
(15)
2.80
(2)
6.86
(41)
6.73
(6)
5.75
(2)
0.0
(0)
6.79
(35)
5.34
(5^
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
INHALE
Nn
2.35
(2)
3.64
(5)
2.80
(1)
1.44
(5)
0.0
(0)
3.40
(1)
3.20
(2)
0.0
(0)
7.17
(3)
3.40
(1)
3.30
(1)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
5.90
(2)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
Yes
4.66
(14
3.21
(14)
2.48
(14)
1.73
(44)
5.29
(36)
4.42
(17)
4.39
(16)
2.28
(5)
5.70
(105
5.80
(31)
4.31
(14)
2.80
(2N
6.86
(41)
6.73
(6)
5.75
(2)
0.0
(0)
6.84
(33)
5.34
(5)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
-------
Table M-18.
WASHINGTON D. C.
RELATIONSHIP OF TOBACCO USE TO COHb
AGE GROUPS
SMOKING CATEGORIES
§
^«f
< 1
1.5 packs 1
2r3
2> 4
< 1
2 packs 1
or more
2-3
-
£4
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
!<«*«•• M
nour
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
hour
1-19
3.80
(41
4.30
(2)
1.80
(D
1.12
(11)
4.61
(7)
3.83
(3)
4.05
(4)
1.67
(3)
4.88
(6)
7.30
(2)
4.80
(D
1.90
(D
6.50
(21
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(01
0.0
(0)
0.0
(01
4.40
(D
20-29
2.92
(10)
3.18
(6)
2.34
(10)
1.52
(10)
, 4.21
(27)
4.94
(12)
4.23
(9)
3.65
(2)
5.54
(72)
4.77
(24)
4.52
(9)
1.60
(4)
5.81
(22)
5.39
' (7)
4.20
(D
0.0
(0)
5.71
(14)
6.40
(D
0.0
(0)
:o.o
(0)
30-39
4.10
(3)
3.83
(6)
2.57
(31
3.17
(4)
4.80
(10)
3.77
(3)
6.15
(4)
0.0
(0)
6.20
(28)
5.77
(3)
4.50
(2^
0.0
(0)
7.39
(15)
6.35
(2)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(01
7.63
(15)
5.80
(D
0.0
(0)
0.0
<0) M ,
M-l
40-49
2.05
(2)
4.83
(3)
1.40
(11
2.45
(41
4.62
(9)
5.33
(3)
5.23
(3)
0.0
(0)
6.06
(16)
3.90
(D
3.90
(2)
0.0
(0)
6.95
(8)
6.67
(4)
7.50
(D
0.0
(0)
5.67
(7)
6.80
(D
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
8
50-59
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
2.90
(D
2.55
(4)
2.00
(3)
4.30
(2)
2.75
(2)
1.80
(D
6.07
(7)
7.55
(2)
3.60
(D
0.0
(0)
7.10
(D
5.15
(2)
0.0
(0)
1.90
(D
7.96
(5)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
60+
4.20
(1)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
: (0)
0.0
(01
5.30
(D
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(01
0.0
(0)
ALL
ACES
3.25
(20)
3.84
(17)
2.32
(16)
1.82
(33)
4.31
(56)
4.64
(23)
4.55
(22)
2.20
(7)
5.74
(129)
5.17
(32)
4.39
(15)
1.66
(5)
6.55
(48)
5.83
(15)
5.85
(21
1.90
(D
0.0 16.68
(0)
7.50
(1)
0.0
(0)
o.o
(ro)
(41)
6.62
(41
0.0
(0)
4.40
(D
INHALE
No
1.20
(D
6.10
(D
4.50
(D
0.65
(4)
2.82
(5)
0.0
(0)
7.80
(D
1.70
(1)
4.70
(2)
6.20
(11
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0,0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
5,25
(21
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(1)
Yes
3.56
(17:
3.78
(14:
2.21
(14:
1.97
(28:
4.41
(50:
4.79
(20)
4.40
(21)
1.68
(5)
5.76
(126
5.10
(301
4.39
(15)
1.66
(51
6.55
(48)
5.8^
(15)
4.20
(D
1.90
(11
fi 75
(39)
6.62
(41
0.0
(0)
4. .40
(11
-------
APPENDIX N.
Table N-l.
ANCHORAGE
INFLUENCE OF OCCUPATION ON COHb
AGE GROUPS °-19 2°-29 30-39 40-49 50-59
60+
ALL
AGES
Male
Non Smoke
Coming Female
from
Home
Male
Smoke
Female
Male
Non Smoke
Coming Female
from
Work
(White
Collar) Male
Smoke
Female
Male
Non Smoke
Coining »„__! _
0 rentaie
from
Work
(Blue
Collar) Male
Smoke
Female
Male
vACIAC
Non Smoke
Coming
from Female
Work
(Brown
Collar) M*16
Smoke
Female
Totals
2.57
(8)
1.60
(6)
4.65
(8)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
1.10
(2)
1.40
(2)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
2.70
(2)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
6.30
(2)
0.0
(0)
3.01
(30)
1.65
(2)
2.20
(2)
4.60
(5)
2.87
(7)
2.01
(11)
1.97
(3)
7.26
(7)
4.00
(1)
2.30
(3)
0.0
(0)
5.18
(13)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
1.10
(2)
0.0
(0)
3.75
(56)
0.0
(0)
0.90
(1)
5.90
CD
0.0
(0)
2.39
(10)
1.80
(2)
4.90
(4)
7.92
(4)
1:40
(5)
0.0
(0)
4.32
(4)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
3.55
(31)
1.37
(4)
2.10
(2)
3.70
(4)
0.0
(0)
1.87
(7)
1.72
(4)
2.90
(7)
2.53
(3)
2.92
(9)
0.0
(0)
6.67
(8)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
3.17
(48)
^••••^••^•••••^v
1.22
(4)
1.50
(2)
4.45
(2)
0.0
(0)
1.95
(4)
2.40
(1)
6.30
(5)
0.0
(0)
2.15
(4)
0.0
(0)
6.83
(3)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
3.50
(25)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
1.91
(18)
1.70
(13)
4.49
(20)
2.87
(7)
2.09
(32)
1.75
(12)
5.00
(25)
5.41
(8)
2.32
(21)
0.0
(0)
5.47
(30)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
3.70
(4)
0.0
(0)
N-l
-------
Table N-2.
CHICAGO
INFLUENCE OF OCCUPATION ON COHb
AGE .GROUPS 0-19 20-29 30-39 40-49 50-59
60+
ALL
AGES
Male
Non Smoke
Coming Female
from
Home
Male
Smoke
Female
Male
Non Smoke
Coming . Female
from
Work
(White , M .
Collar) Male
Smoke
Female
Male
Non Smoke
Coming „ ,
E ema x e
from
Work
(Blue
Collar) Male "'
Smoke
Female
Male
Non Smoke
Coming
from Female
Work
(Brown
Collar) "ale
Smoke
Female
Totals
••MBMMMMHMM
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
2.07
(3)
0.0
(0)
5.50
(1)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
•••••••••••••••^•H
1.60
(1)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
d.o
(0)
2.14
(19)
2.58
(ID
6.39
(15)
6.87
(6)
1.75
(6)
1.70
(1)
6.66 .
(9)
0.0
(0)
MMBBi^MM^HI^H^M
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
2.01
(16)
2.40
(2)
6.46
(10)
4.60
(2'
2.17
(6) .
2.20
(1)
7.46
(16)
5.80
(I)
^^^^•MPH^MM^HMM
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
2.18
(15)
2.47
(11)
6.57
(22)
6.21
(12)
2.21
(12)
0.0
(0)
6.53
(7)
0.0
(0)
•mMHBH^M^HHHff
2.20
(1)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
2.17
'(7)
2.03
(11)
6.15
(13)
5.01
(7)
2.33
(7)
0.0
(0)
7.25
(ID
7.80
(3)
•PVNM^MM^^M^^v
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
4.10
(1)
0.0
(0)
2.70
(1)
3.30
(2)
6.47
6.65
(2)
0.0
(0)
2.00
(1)
8.07
(4)
0.0
(0)
i i i i i
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
o.o
(0)
0.0
(0)
2.92
(4)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(o;
0.0
(0)
4.11
(68)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
4.65
(54)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
4.45
(79)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
4.57
(60)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
^•••••iHM^HMMBM
5.79
(15)
^^^•MHMMM^HMMMV
1.90
(2)
0.0
(0)
4.10
(1)
0.0
(0)
2.13
(58)
2.39
(40)
6.42
5.96
(30)
2.14
(31)
1.97
(3)
7.17
(47)
7.30
(4)
0.0
(0)
0,0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
N-2
-------
Table N-3.
DENVER
INFLUENCE OF OCCUPATION ON COHb
AGE GROUPS 0-19 20-29 30-39 .40-49 50-59
60+
ALL
AGES
Male
Non Smoke
Coming Female
from
Home
Male
Smoke
Female
Male
Non Smoke
Coming Female
from
Work
(White
Collar) Male
Smoke
Female
Male
Non Smoke
Coming Female
from
Work
(Blue
Collar) Male
Smoke
Female
Male
Non Smoke
Coming
from Female
Work
(Brown
Collar) Mai6
Smoke
Female
Totals
1.75
(2)
2.25
(4)
5.93
(3)
0.0
(0)
2.04
(5)
1.19
(11)
.4.20
.(3)
3.85
(2)
0.0
0.0
(0)
6.87
(3)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
2.86
(33)
2.28
(66)
1.75
(19)
5.90
(125)
5.09
(14)
2.04
(70)
1.77
(40)
5.90
(61)
5.00
(23)
2.37
(21)
1.80
(1)
6.57
(57)
3.00
(1)
2.80
(1)
0.0
(0)
5.60
(2)
0.0
(0)
4.24
(501)
2.42
(51)
2.00
(8)
.6.29
(62)
4.38
(5)
1.95
(43)
1.47
(10)
6.32
(26)
3.86
(5)
1.95
(33)
1.53
(3)
6.36
(27)
0.0
(0)
3.60
(1)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
3.93
(274)
2.07
(40)
1.80
(6)
5.51
(55)
6.92
(12)
1.95
(30)
1.73
(6)
5. .4.4
(18)
5.05
(4)
1.99
(21)
1.60
(1)
6.34
(22)
0.0
(0)
2.10
(1)
0.0
(0)
5.65
(2)
0.0
(0)
3.96
(218^
2.55
(17)
1.80
(4)
4.95
(23)
5.04
(8)
2.59
(20)
2.00
(2)
5.47
(10)
5.00
(4)
1.65
(12)
1.55
(2)
7.01
(9)
0.0
(0)
1.90
(1)
0.0
(0)
4.70
(2)
0.0
(0)
3.79
(114)
1.10
(1)
2.00
(1)
4.40
(1)
4.30
(1)
2.40
(1)
0.0
(0)
6.00
. (1)
0.0
(0)
3.30
(1)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
.(0)
3.36
(7)
2.29
(177)
1.86
(42)
5.82
(269)
5.52
(40)
2.07
(169)
1.64
(69)
5.84
(119)
4.79
(38)
2.03
(88)
1.59
(7)
6.52
(118)
3.00
(1)
2.60
(4)
0.0
(0)
5.32
(6)
0.0
(0)
N-3
-------
. Table N-4.
DETROIT
INFLUENCE OF OCCUPATION ON COHb
AGE GROUPS
0-19
20-29
30-39
40-49
50-59
60+
ALL
AGES
Male
Non Smoke
Coming Female
from
Home
Male
Smoke
Female
Male
Non Smoke
Coming Female
from
Work
(White
Collar) **le
Smoke
Female
Male
Non Smoke
<;orain8 Female
xirorn
Work
(Blue
Collar) Male
Smoke
Female
Male
Non Smoke
Coming
from Female
Work
(Brown
Collar) **le
Smoke
Female
Totals
1.40
(10)
0.90
(1)
7.70
(4)
5.80
(2)
1.13
(14)
0.93
(34)
6.11
(11)
2.28
(6)
1.70
(2)
0.0
(0)
•f-
4.82
(10)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
2.52
(94)
1.79
(13)
1.64
(14)
6.08
(13)
4.67
(3)
1.63
(147)
1.22
(48)
5.74
(81)
4.32
(24)
1.97
(31)
1.13
(3)
6.27
(38)
5.03
(7)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
3.18
(422)
1.73
(30)
1.30
(6)
6.04
(12)
3.66
(5)
1.53
(163)
1.19
(21)
6.46
(53)
5.02
(16)
1.70
(55)
1.00
(1)
5.98
(37)
0.0
<0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
2.92
(399)
1.97
(33)
0.87
(3)
7.83
(23)
4.59
(7)
1.68
(170)
1.21
(20)
6.18
(83)
4.05
(11)
1.78
' (74)
1.08
(6)
5.94
(74)
4.10
(1)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
O.G
(0)
0.0
(0)
3.42
(505)
2.02
(18)
1.06
. (5)
6.27
(15)
5.. 30
(3)
1.61
(78)
1.37
(12)
6.76
(40)
4.44
(5)
1.40
(37)
1.45
(8)
6.48
(37)
6.20
(1)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0. 0
(0)
0.0
(0)
3.46
(259)
1.45
(2)
0.0
(0)
6.10
(1)
0.0
(0)
1.46
(5)
0.0
(0)
5.50
(5)
0.0
(0)
1.29
(7)
0.0
(0)
6.00
(4)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
3.20
(24)
1.83
(106)
1.37
(29)
6.80
(681
4.59
(20)
1.60
(577)
1.15
(135)
6.17
(273)
4.27
(62)
1.70
(206)
1.25
(18)
6.05
(200)
5.06
(9)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
N-4
-------
Table N-5.
AGE GROUPS
HONOLULU
INFLUENCE OF OCCUPATION ON COHb
0-19 20-29 30-39 40-49 50-59
60+
ALL
AGES
Male
Non Smoke
Coming Female
from .
Home
Male
Smoke
Female
Male
Non Smoke
Coming Female
from
Work
(White
Collar) **le
Smoke
Female
Male
Non Smoke
Coming Female
from
Work
(Blue
Collar) Male
Smoke
Female
Male
Non Smoke
Coming
from Female
Work
(Brown
Collar) M*16
Smoke
Female
Totals
1.50
(1)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
1.20
(1)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
2.60
(1)
0.0
(0)
3.90
(1)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
2.30
(4)
1.67
(23)
1.30
(3)
5.31
(29)
9.05
(2)
1.51
(37)
0.70
(2)
5.36
(33)
0.0
(0)
1.63
(28)
2.10
(1)
5.05
(33)
0.0
(0)
1.10
(1)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
3.46
(192)
1.50
(50)
1.13
(3)
4.70
(46)
3.50
(3)
1.44
(44)
1.25
(6)
5.75
(39)
4.54
(7)
1.47
(34)
0.0
(0)
5.77
(49)
0.0
(0)
1.00
(1)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
3.43
(282)
1.69
(31)
1.54
(5)
4.19
(27)
4.27
(4)
1.54
(34)
1.27
(4)
4.85
(37)
8.23
(3)
1.84
(43)
0.0
(0)
5.20
(34)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
7.50
(1)
0.0
(0)
3.21
(223)
1.54
(16)
1.80
(1)
4.53
(11)
3.50
(1)
1.55
(19)
1.10
(1)
3.57
(12)
3.50
(2)
1.51
(10)
1.10
(1)
6.35
(8)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
8.60
(1)
0.0
(0)
2.84
(83)
1.33
(3)
0.90
(1)
3.70
(1)
0.0
(0)
1.40
(3)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
1.75
(2)
0.0
(0)
5.23
(3)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
2.46
(13)
1.58
(124)
1.36
(13)
4.71
(114)
4.92
(10)
1.49
(138)
1.16
(13)
5.15
(121)
. 5.29
(12N
1.66
(118)
1.60
(2)
5.44
(128)
0.0
(0)
1.05
(2)
0.0
(0)
8.05
(2)
0.0
(0)
N-5
-------
Table N-6.
HOUSTON
INFLUENCE OF OCCUPATION ON COHb
AGE GROUPS 0-19 20-29 30-39 40-49 50-59
60+
ALL
AGES
W^ »^ •"• — •-"
Male
Non Smoke
Coming Female
from
Home
Male
Smoke
Female
Male
Non Smoke
Coming Female
from
Work
Collar) Male
Smoke
Female
Male
Non Smoke
Coming p,™ „ i _
° remale
from
Work
(Blue
Collar) Male
Smoke
Female
Male
Non Smoke
Coming
from Female
Work
(Brown
Collar) **le
Smoke
Female
Totals
MHMVMMI^Hi^BM
0.0
(0)
0.70
(1)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
1.27
(4)
0.63
(3)
0.70
0.0
(0)
0.97
(3)
0.0
(0)
b.o
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
fen
0.94
(12)
1.32
(16)
0.95
(2)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
2.25
(33)
2.06
(16)
2.62
(4)
0.0
(0)
1.21
(21)
0.0
(0)
6.90
(1)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
1.86
(93)
1.68
(12)
0.95
(2)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
1.49
(12)
1.63
(3)
4.93
(3)
0.0
(0)
1.40
(11)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
1.75
(43)
2.1-1
(8)
2.10
(2)
3.50
(2)
0.0
(0)
1.75
(23)
9.60
(2)
5.50
(2)
0.0
(0)
1.38
(6)
0.0
(0)
7.40
(1)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
. _
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
2.48
(46)
0.97
(3)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
1.36
(14)
1.35
(4)
0.0
(0)
2.20
(1)
2.05
(2)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
1.40
(24)
1.00
(2)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
1.00
(2)
1.54
(41)
1.24
(7)
3.50
(2)
0.0
(0)
1.82
(86)
2.30
(28)
3.70
(10)
2.20
(1)
1.30
(43)
0.0
(0)
7.15
(2)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
N-6
-------
Table N-7.
LOS ANGELES
INFLUENCE OF OCCUPATION ON COHb
AGE GROUPS 0-19 20-29 30-39 40-49 50-59
60"1
ALL
AGES
Male
Non Smoke
Coming Female
from
Home
Male
Smoke
Female
Male
Non Smoke
Coming Female
from
Work
(White
Collar) K"1"
Smoke
Female
Male
Non Smoke
C°min8 Female
from
Work
(Blue
Collar) Male
Smoke
Female
Male
Non Smoke
Coming
from Female
Work
(Brown
Collar) M*16
Smoke
Female
Totals
1.80
(6)
1.74
(7)
5.93
(3)
7.30
(1)
2.32
(43)
1.96
(58)
5.96
(18)
6.01.
(13)
1.51
(14-)
0.99
(8)
5.95
(10)
7.20
(1)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
2.98
(182)
2.11
(40)
1.90
(22"*
6.68-
(28)
6.69
(10)
2.00
(301)
2.00
(166)
6.12
(143)
5.86
(73)
2.03
(186)
1.42.
(25)
5.90
(159)
5.82
(15)
1.00
(!>
0.0
(0)
6.60
(1)
0.0
(0)
3.47
(1170)
1.99
(55)
1.98
(12)
6.77
(19)
6.46
(9)
2.01
(378)
2.08
(54)
6.30
(135)
5.69
(49)
2.14
(124)
2.16
(7)
6.30
(95)
5.37
(12)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
3.44
(949)
2.06
(47)
2.07
(14)
6.68
(19)
7.80
(8)
1.96
(356)
1.80
(70)
6.57
(128)
5.83
(62)
1.97
(120)
2.16
(18.)
6.42
(105)
6.69
(14)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
6.40
(1^
0.0
(0)
3.52
(962)
2.02
(27)
2.00
(10)
6. 98
(19)
4.06
(5>
1.95
(261)
2 . 09-
(54)
6.58
(110)
5.87
(42)
1 . 96
(112)
2.02
(21)
6.29
(99)
6.78
(13)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
3.61
(773)
1.50
(2)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0,
1.96
(29)
2.57
(4)
6.55
(13)
5.25
(2)
1.78
(15)
1.95
(2)
5.92
(17)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0>
F '-'
3.53
(84)
2.03
(177)
1.95
(65)
6.74
(88)
6.52
(331)
1.99
(1368;
1.99
(406)
6.37
(547)
5.82
(241)
2.01
(571)
1.77
(81)
6.17
(485)
6.20
(55)
1.00
(1)
0.0
(0)
6.50
(2)
0.0
(0)
N-7
-------
Table N-8.
AGE GROUPS
MIAMI
INFLUENCE OF OCCUPATION ON COHb
0-19 20-29 30-39 40-49 50-59
60+
ALL
AGES
Male
Non Smoke
Coming Female
from
Home
Male
Smoke
Female
Male
Non Smoke
Coming Female
from
Work
(White
Collar) M*16
Smoke
Female
Male
Non Smoke
Coming pemale
from
Work
(Blue
Collar) Male
Smoke
Female
Male
Non Smoke
Coining
from Female
Work
(Brown
Collar) M316
Smoke
Female
—
Totals
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
7.16
(8)
2.10
(1)
2.09
(7)
0.0
(0)
4.59
(9)
1.40
(1)
0.90
(1)
0.0
(0)
4.82
(4)
0.0
(0)
1.92
(34)
1.30
(1)
4.93
(85)
2.30
(3)
1.09
(37)
1.04
(19)
4.19
(47)
5.41
(IS'*
1.46
(21)
0.0
(0)
4.66
(4)
0.0
(0^
1.66
(18)
1.80
(3)
5.78
(40)
5.25
(2)
1.41
(31)
1.32
(4)
5.16
(22)
5.48
(12)
1.12
(13)
0.0
(0)
5.99
(38)
5.85
(2)
1.50
(27)
1.13
(3)
5.21
(49)
4.40
(1)
1.39
(16)
1.16
(15)
5.13
(23)
5.39
(8)
1.01
(16)
0.0
(0)
5.42
(26)
6.25
(2)
1.43
(11)
0.0
(0)
5.31
(26)
5.75
(2)
1.47
(20)
0.85
(8)
5.32
(19)
3.05
(12)
1.36
(10)
0.0
(0)
6.40
48)
0.0
(0)
1.10
(4)
0.50
(1)
1.66
(94)
1.45
! (8)
o.o •_.:';
(0) ''I.'*,
0.0
(0)
1.80
(2)
0.0
(0)
6.19
(7)
0.0
(0)
1.25
(2)
0.0
(0)
5.87
(3)
0.0
(0)
* i | I |
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(u)
0.0
(0>
4.42
(31)
0.0
(0)
0.0
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0) , (0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0>
3.48
(303)
0.0
(0)
0.0
4.10
(185)
O.u
(0>
0.0
(0)
6.40
(1)
0.0
((»
3.64
(187)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
3.71
(126)
0.0
(0)
•0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
3.84
(19>
3.93
(9)
1.36
(113)
1.07
(46)
4.84
(127)
4,79
(51)
1.24
(63)
0.0
(0)
5.49
(127)
6.05
(4)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
6.40
(1)
0.0
/o\
1 \J J
N-8
-------
AGE GROUPS
Table N-9.
MILWAUKEE
INFLUENCE OF OCCUPATION ON COHb
0-19 20-29 30-39 40-49 50-59
60-*
ALL
AGES
Male
Non Smoke
Coming. Female
from
Home
Male
Smoke
Female
Male
Non Smoke
Coming Female
from
Work
(White
Collar) Kale
Smoke
Female
Male
Non Smoke
Coming „ ,
female
from
Work
(Blue
Collar) Male
Smoke
Female
Male
Non Smoke
Coming
from Female
Work
(Brown
Collar) M*16
Smoke
Female
Totals
0.70
(1)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.70
(1)
0.92
(6)
1.16
(7)
7.48
(5)
0.0
(0)
1.07
(4)
0.87
(3)
6.55
(2)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
7.30
(1)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
2.80
(28)
i^H^HMMMMAMMMHHi^
1.48
(13)
0.87
(3)
4.05
(6)
7.50
(1)
1.46
(5)
0.60
(1)
5.00
(5)
1.40
(2)
1.80
(3)
0.0
(0)
3.70
(1)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
2.46
(40)
MMMMM^^MMMM^
1.28
(14)
0.70
(2)
6.58
(5)
5.17
(4)
1.35
(6)
0.85
(2)
6.87
(4)
0.0
(0)
1.37
(4)
0.0
(0)
5.60
(1)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
2.89
(42)
1.45
(6)
1.10
(1)
2.90
(1)
4.75
(2)
0.97
(3)
0.0
(0)
4.40
(3)
5.20
-------
AGE GROUPS
Table N-10.
NEW ORLEANS
INFLUENCE OF OCCUPATION ON COHb
0-19 .20-29 30-39 40-49 50-59
60H
ALL
AGES
Male
Non Smoke
Coming Female
from
Home
Male
Smoke
Female
Male
Non Smoke
Coming Female
from
Work
(White „ ,
Collar) **le
Smoke
Female
Male
Non Smoke
Coming Female
xirom
Work
(Blue
Collar) Male
Smoke
Female
Male
Non Smoke
doming
from Female
•fork
(Brown
dollar) M*16
Smoke
Female
Totals
1.49
(10)
2.05
(2)
4.69
(28)
4.10
(1)
1.55
(2)
1.40
(1)
6.00
(1)
6.30
(1)
1.65
(2)
0.0
(0)
4.80
(2)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
5.95
(2)
0.0
(0)
3.77
(52)
2.09
(33)
0.0
(0)
5,,47
C64)
5.70
(4)
1.37
(4)
0.0
(0)
7.1)3
00
5. £10
0)
1.69
(8)
0.0
(0)
5.66
(1<0
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
4.52
(142)
UMMVMMMJMMW
2.21
(12)
1.30
(1)
5.99
(13)
0.0
(0)
1.85
(2)
0.0
(0)
8.00
(1)
0.0
(0)
1.90
(2)
0.0
(0)
5.20
(4)
0.0
(0)
1.50
(1)
0.0
(0)
8.50
(1)
0.0
(0)
4.11
(37)
1.62
(13)
1.80
(1)
5.69
(41)
1.90
(1)
1.70
(2)
0.0
(0)
5.36
(5)
4.00
(1)
1.80
' (2)
0.0
(0)
5.90
(7)
9.30
(1)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
6.20
(1)
0.0
(0)
4.70
(75)
2.45
(6)
0.0
(0)
6.51
(14)
5.20
(1)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
6.80
(1)
0.0
(0)
1.60
(1)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
5.20
(23)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
1.50
(1)
0.0
(0)
4.30
(2)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
3.37
(3)
1.98
(74)
1.80
(4)
5.52
(160)
4.86
(7)
1.57
(10)
1.40
(1)
6.79
(17)
5.37
(3)
1.71
(16)
0.0
(0)
5.53
(34)
9.30
(1)
1.50
(1)
0.0
(0)
6.65
(4)
0.0
(0)
N-10
-------
Table N-ll.
NEW YORK CITY
INFLUENCE OF OCCUPATION ON COHb
AGE GROUPS 0-19 20-29 30-39 40-49 50-59
60-*
ALL
AGES
Male
Non Smoke
Coming Female
from
Home
Male
Smoke
Female
Male.
Non Smoke
Coming Female
from
Work
(White M.IO
Collar) Hale
Smoke
Female
Male
Non Smoke
C°mln8 Female
rirom
Work
(Blue
Collar) Male
Smoke
Female
Male
Non Smoke
Coming
from Female
Work
(Brown
Collar) tele
' Smoke
Female
Totals
1.62
(4)
1.40
(1)
5.70
(3)
1.50
(3)'
1.12
(59)
1.15
(70)
3.25
(26)
3.87
(37)
1.10
(14)
4.20
(1)
4.85
(20)
4.85
(2)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
2.21
(240)
1.62
(48)
2.19
(16),
5.73
(54)
3.52
(6)
1.39
(284)
1.23
(200)
5 . 11
(197)
4.22
(166)
1,61
(76)
1 . 50
(2)
4. 72
(84).
3.72
(5)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
2.93
(1138)
1.69
(60)
1..11
(11)
5.33
(40)
4.85
(10)
1.3.8
(261)
1.31
(78)
5.33
(126)
4.38
(112)
1.81
(45)
.90
(1)
5.76
(83)
5.57
(7)
.90
(1)
0.0
(0)
4.50
(1)
0.0
(0)
3.12
(836)
1..51
(78)
1.23
(23)
5.32
(53)
3.51
(16)
1.54
(211)
1.25
(124)
5.06
(139)
4.49
(121)
1.79
(59)
1.44
(14)
5. 51
(74)
5.07
(3)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
3.02
(915)
1.65
(50)
1.25
(18)
5.87
(39)
5.47
(8)
1.44
(130)
1.34
(77)
5.18
(85)
4.80
(58)
1.74
(52)
1.23
(3)
5.02
(49)
2.50
(4)
2.40
(1)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
3.03
(574)
2.09
(7)
2.00
(1)
6.10
(9)
4.30
(1)
1.44
(23)
1.48
(10)
5.29
(16)
4.08
(ID
1.86
(10)
0.0
(0)
5.14
(12)
3.60
(1)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
3.34— ^
(101)
1.62
(247)
1.45
(70)
5.58
(198)
4.05
(44)
1.41
(968)
1.25
(559)
5.08
(589)
4.36
(505)
1.69
(256)
1.52
(21)
5.24
(322)
4.37
(22)
1.65
(2)
0.0
(0)
4.50
(1)
0.0
(0)
N-ll
-------
Table N-12.
PHOENIX
INFLUENCE OF OCCUPATION ON COHb
AGE GROUPS 0-19 20-29 30-39 40-49 50-59
ALL
AGES
Male
Non Smoke
Coming Female
from
Home
Male
Smoke
Female
Male
Non Smoke
Coming Female
from
Work
(White
Collar) Male
Smoke
Female
Male
Non Smoke
C°mln8 Female
from
T T 1
Work
(Blue
Collar) Male
Smoke
Female
Male
Non Smoke
Coming
from Female
Work
(Brown
r,o i .._\ Male
~ ' f'
Smoke
Female
Totals
^••MHM^H^^^M
1.25
(2)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
1.40
(2)
0.0
(0)
0.80
(1)
0.0
(0)
1.0
(1)
2.10
(1)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
•^••^^•MMMB^^BVH
1.58
(13)
0.93
(6)
4.83
(6)
2.55
(2)
1.53
(11)
1.17
(4)
4.82
(16)
3.60
(1)
1.50
(4)
.90
(1)
5.47
(3)
.60
MMMiMMMiHHH^M
1.30
(8)
0.90
(1)
4.70
(14)
6.20
(1)
1.06
(5)
1.15
(2)
4.31
(7)
4.60
(2)
0.0
(0) -
0.0
(0)
4.94
(5)
0.0
(1) (0)
•••••^•MMHMM
1.14
(10)
1.33
(3)
5.23
(9)
7.60
(2)
1.16
(5)
0.0
(0)
3.05
(4)
1.00
(2)
2.15
(8)
0.0
(0)
4.05
(4)
0.0
(0)
NHMI^HHHiHMMMHniM
1.53
(3)
0.0
(0)
4.02
(5)
0.0
(0)
1.11
(8)
1.37
(3)
5.27
(3)
0.0
(0)
2.0
(1)
0.0
(0)
4.40
(1)
0.0
(0)
^••••••IMM^^^MK
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
5.03
(3)
0.0
(0)
1.00
(1)
0.0
(0)
6.40
(1)
3.75
(2)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
1.37
(36)
1.05
(10)
4.79
(37)
5.30
(5)
1.27
(32)
1.23
(9)
4.46
(32)
3.19
(7)
1.87
(14)
1.50
(2)
4.75
(13)
.60
(0) (1)
t 1
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(6)
1.31
(7)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
3.0
(1)
0.0
(0)
2.75
(69)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
3.44
(45)
' 0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
2.79
(47)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
to)
0.0
(0)
2.50
(24)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(u)
0.0
(0)
4.29
(7)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
3.0
CO
0.0
fOI
N-12
-------
AGE GROUPS
Table N-13.
ST. LOUIS
INFLUENCE OF OCCUPATION ON COHb
0-19 20-29 30-39 40-49 50-59
60"1
ALL
AGES
Male
Non Smoke
Coming Female
from
Home
Male
Smoke
Female
Male
Non Smoke
Coming Female
from
Work
(White
Collar) Male
Smoke
Female
Male
Non Smoke
Female
from
«7ork
(Blue
Collar) Male
Smoke
Female
Male
Non Smoke
Coming
from Female
•Jork
(Brown
Collar) M3!6
Smoke
Female
Totals
1.64
(9)
1.51
(7)
5.97
(3)
5.00
(1)
0.90
(2)
1.40
(1)
5.93
(3)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
1.40
(1)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
2.62
(27)
1.62
(28)
1.54
(14)
5.41
(14)
4.34
(8)
1.41
(59)
1.23
(39)
5.48
(29)
3.97
(16)
2.15
(17)
0.0
(0)
5.53
(21)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
2.79
(245)
1.72
(30)
1.20
(1)
6.13
(24)
4.57
(8)
1.37
(80)
1.34
(14)
5.47
(21)
4.64
(13)
1.46
(23)
0.0
(0)
5.77
(7)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
2.78
(221)
1.65
(37)
1.46
(5)
5.21
(26)
4.23
(6)
1.40
(65)
1.38
(17)
5.48
(29)
6.30
(6)
1.57
(27)
1.53
(3)
5.94
(17)
0.0
(0)
1.40
(1)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
2.89
(239)
1.50
(9)
1.67
(3)
5.12
(5)
2.30
(2)
1.33
(15)
1.09
(12)
6.70
(12)
4.87
(3)
1.49
(11)
1.20
(2)
5.48
(12)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
(0)
0.0
(0)
3.04
(86)
1.63
(3)
1.50
(3)
4.22
(4)
0.0
(0)
1.40
(1)
1.63
(3)
2.80
(2)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
(0)
OoO
(0)
2.39
(16)
1.65
(116)
1.52
(33)
5.51
(76)
4.25
(25)
1.39
(222)
1.28
(86)
5.59
(96)
4.64
(38)
1.65
(78)
1.40
(6)
5.67
(57)
0.0
(0)
1.40
(1)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
N-13
-------
Table N-14.
SALT LAKE CITY
INFLUENCE OF OCCUPATION ON COHh
AGE GROUPS 0-19 20-29 30-39 40-49 50-59
60+
ALL
AGES
Male
Non Smoke
Coming Female
from
Home
Male
Smoke
Female
Male
Non Smoke
Coming Female
from
Work
(White „ ,
Collar) Male
Smoke
Female
Male
Non Smoke
<;omin8 Female
from
Work
(Blue
Collar) Male
Smoke
Female
Male
Non Smoke
Coming
from Female
Work
(Brown
Collar) M316
Smoke
Female
Totals
2.40
(3)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
2.30
(1)
1.63
(13)
1.36
(32)
3.87
(4)
2.60
(1)
3.10
(3)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
1.50
(1)
0.0
(0)
0. 0
(0)
0.0
(0)
1.78
(58)
1.78
(13)
0.94
(8)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
1.44
(60)
1.26
(26)
3.94
(10)
4.95
(6)
1.66
(22)
1.45
(2)
5.11
(11)
6.90
(3)
1.15
(2)
0.0
(0)
G.O
(0)
0.0
(0)
2.07
(163)
1.36
(28)
0.92
(5)
4.70
(5)
0.0
(0)
1.25
(41)
1.16
(7)
4.99
(17)
3.67
(3)
1.88
(26)-
1.57
(3)
4.82
(18)
0.0
(0)
0.65
(2)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
2.34
(155)
1.26
(14)
0.90
(9)
6.80
(1)
5.30
(1)
1.24
(32)
1.00
(16)
4.82
(8)
5.67
(3)
1.50
(26)
1.10
(2)
7.37
(7)
0.0
(0)
1.15
(2)
0.0
(0)
u . u
(0)
0.0
(0)
2.02
(121)
1.41
(20)
0.88
(5)
6.38
(6)
6.85
(2)
1.76
(10)
1.59
(8)
6.96
(7)
2.80
(2)
1.29
(14)
1.90
(3)
5.77
(6)
s\ r\
o.O
fn\
CO
1.25
(2)
0.0
(0)
(j • v/
(0)
0.0
(0)
2.71
(85)
1.05
(4)
1.50
(1)
0.0
(0)
3.80
(1)
1.07
(4)
0.0
(0)
3.75
(2)
0.0
(0)
1.40
(2)
0.0
(0)
j
6.20
(1)
0.0
1
1.45
(82)
0.93
(28)
5.72
(12)
5.02
(5)
1.38
(160)
1.27
(89)
4.89
(48)
4.39
(15)
1.66
(93)
1.55
(10)
5.47
(43)
6.90
(0) j! (3)
0.0
(0)
1
I
0.0
(Q) i
1.10
(9)
0.0
(0)
ji
o.o ;
(0) i
f\ f\
~(0)
I
0.0 i 0.0
(0) J (0)
2.02
(15)
N-14
-------
Table N-15.
SAN FRANCISCO
INFLUENCE OF OCCUPATION ON COHb
AGE GROUPS
0-19
20-29
30-39
40-49
50-59
60+
ALL
AGES
Male
Non Smoke
Coming Female
from
Home
Male
Smoke
Female
Male
Non Smoke
Coming Female
from
Work
(White „ ,
Collar) **le
Smoke
Female
Male
Non Smoke
Coming Ffimale
iTTim
i» L \JUl
rfork
(Blue
Collar) Male
Smoke
Female
Male
Non Smoke
doming
from Female
•Jork
(Brown
3ollar) M*le
Smoke
Female
Totals
1.55
(2)
1.34
(5)
7.90
(1)
0.0
(0)
1.75
(2)
1.70
(7)
6.90
(1)
7.30
(2)
1.70
(1)
1.60
(1)
5.00
(1)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
2.73
(23)
1.53
(32)
1.43
(14)
5.63
(15)
4.38
(10)
1.76
(53)
1.69
(75)
6.37
(45)
4.92
(48)
2.06
(21)
0.0
(0)
5.89
(24)
1.75
(2)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
3.33
(339)
1.81
(15)
1.53
(6)
5.64
(7)
4.17
(4)
1.85
(65).
1.33
(21)
5.57
(26)
6.16
(24)
1.93
(18)
0.0
(0)
5.11
(9)
6.50
(1)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
3.17
(196)
1.64
(22)
1.22
(4)
6.09
(14)
6.43
(3)
1.91
(60)
1.64
(13)
5.94
(24)
4.73
(20)
i . yb
(17)
0.0
(0)
5.87
(9)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0>
3.25
(186)
1.43
(10)
1.55
(4)
5.45
(4)
0.0
(0)
1.83
(40)
1.51
(19)
5.55
(25)
5.03
(26)
1.92
(15)
0.0
(0)
5.52
(13)
7.30
(2)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
11.30
(1)
0.0
(0)
3.40
(159)
1.60
(2^
1.10
(1)
4.80
(1)
4.30
(2)
1.56
(5)
2.06
(5)
2.17
(3)
3.57
(3)
1.80
(1)
0.0
(0)
5.05
(2)
5.40
(1)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
2.70
(26)
1.60
(83)
1.41
(34)
5.80
(42)
4.65
(19)
1.83
(225)
1.62
(140)
5.86
(124)
5.16
(123)
1.97
(73)
1.60
(1)
5.64
(58)
5.00
(6)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(O')
11.30
(1)
0.0
(0")
N-15
-------
Table N-16.
SEATTLE
INFLUENCE OF OCCUPATION ON COHb
AGE GROUPS 0-19 20-29 30-39 40-49 50-59
ALL
AGES
Male
Non Smoke
Coming Female
from
Home
Male
Smoke
Female
Male
Non Smoke
Coming Female
from
Work
(White „ ,
Collar) H*16
Smoke
Female
Male
Non Smoke
C°minS Female
trorn
Work
(Blue
Collar) Male
Smoke
t-« . ,v _ -i
«.
(6)
0.80
(1)
0.0
(0)
5.70
(1)
0.0
(0)
N-16
-------
Table N-17.
VERMONT - NEW HAMPSHIRE
INFLUENCE OF OCCUPATION ON COHb
AGE GROUPS 0-19 20-29 30-39 40-49 50-59
60+
ALL
AGES
Male
Non Smoke
Coming Female
from
Home
Male
Smoke
Female
Male
Non Smoke
Coming Female
from
Work
(White M.I
Collar) "*le
Smoke
Female
Male
Non Smoke
Coming Female
fvf\m
rrom
Work
(Blue
Collar) Male
Smoke
Female
Male
Non Smoke
Coming
from Female
Work
(Brown
Collar) M3!6
Smoke
Female
Totals
1.53
(3)
1.20
(2)
1.30
(1)
3.30
(1)
1 . 15
(159)
1.22
(18)
3.13
(33)
3.28
(5)
4.10
(1)
0.0
(0)
2.93
(3)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
1.00
(1)
0.0
(0)
1.54
(227)
1.40
(10)
1.13
(9)
3.80
(1)
4.00
(5)
1.21
(191)
1.39
(45)
4.54
(61)
4.55
(24)
1.47
(25)
1.30
(2)
5.76
(26)
2.60
(1)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
6.50
(1)
0.0
(0)
2.31
(401)
1.21
(7)
1.29
(9)
3.97
(7)
4.44
(5)
1.44
(54)
1.34
(19)
4.92
(22)
5.26
(13)
1.65
(22)
1.02
(4)
5.85
(15)
6.43
(3)
4.60
(1)
0.0
(0)
5.35
(2)
0.0
(0)
2.80
(183)
1.97
(12)
1.12
(6)
3.96
(5)
0.0
(0)
1.50
(48)
1.28
(20)
6.16
(28)
4.56
(13)
1.64
(22)
1.30
(7)
5.53
(14)
2.95
(2)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
2.87
(177)
1.39
(9)
1.10
(4)
3.74
(5)
8.85
(2)
1.60
(29)
1.55
(24)
4.79
(17)
5.06
(16)
1.88
(18)
1.28
(5)
6.26
(20)
5.50
(3)
1.15
(2)
0.0
(0)
.80
(1)
0.0
(0)
3.13
(155)
1.50
(1)
1.60
(1)
0.0
(0)
2.50
(2)
1.43
(3)
1.16
(5)
1.90
(1)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
5.90
(1)
7.63
(3)
4.80
(1)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
2.98
(18)
1.54
(42)
1.19
(31)
3.76
(19)
4.55
(15)
1 = 27
(484)
1.36
(131)
4.60
(162)
4.71
(71)
1.67
(88)
1.48
(19)
5.83
(81)
4.91
(10)
2.30
(3)
0.0
(0)
3.80
(5)
0.0
(0)
-_ -.., .__.
N-17
-------
WASHINGTON I). C.
INFLUENCE OF OCCUPATION OF COlIb
AGE GROUPS 0-19 20-29 30-39 40-49 50-59
60"1
ALL
AGES
Male
Non Smoke
Coming Female
from
Home
Male
Smoke
Female
Male
Non Smoke
Coming Female
from
Wbrk
(White „ ,
Collar) N*16
Smoke
Female
Male
Non Smoke
C°mln8 Female
from
Work
(Blue
Collar) Male
Smoke
Female
Male
Non Smoke
Coming
from Female
Work
(Brown
Collar) M*16
Smoke
Female
Totals
1.80
(1)
0.81
(8)
0.0
(0)
5.60
(2)
1.75
(4)
.87
(71)
4.25
(2)
2.51
(40)
2.20
(1)
0.0
(0)
3.57
1.72
(9)
0.97
(9)
7.55
(4)
1.83
(6)
1.40
(107)
1.07
(92)
5.18
(61)
4.38
(49)
1.99
(58)
1.24
(8)
5.76
(6) (61)
1.20 5.55
(2) (4)
0.0 1.10
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
1.63
(137)
(2)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0) j
2.86
(470)
4.68
(5)
1.05
(2)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
1.46
(103)
1.27
(16)
4.97
(32)
4.33
(23)
1.87
(23).
1.70
(1)
5.13
(18)
2.40
(1)
1.30
(3)
0.0
(0)
5.45
(2)
0.0
(0)
2.66
(229)
2.37
(4)
1.00
(2)
4.00
(2)
6.60
(1)
1.51
(75)
1.21
(26)
5.16
(45)
4.74
(21)
1.94
(19)
.40
(1)
5.25
(28)
2.10
(1)
1.05
(2)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
3.04
(227)
1.82
(4)
1.37
(4)
6.80
(3)
1.50
(1)
1.51
(29)
1.38
(25)
5.16
(19)
5.22
(8)
1.66
(12)
1.20
(2)
5.42
(6)
0.0
(0)
1.10
(1)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
2.71
(114)
1.90
(1)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
1.47
(3)
2.30
(1)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
1.50
(1)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
1.30
(2)
, 0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
. (0)
1.59
(8)
2.47
(24)
0.99
(25)
6.51
(9)
3.03
(10)
1.46
(321)
1.08
(231)
5.12
(159)
3.95
(141)
1.92
(114)
1.20
(12)
5.41
(119)
3.64
(8)
1.19
(10)
0.0
(0)
5.45
(2)
0.0
(0)
N-18
-------
APPENDIX 0.
Table 0-1.
ANCHORAGE
INFLUENCE OF WIND SPEED, SEX, AND RACE ON COHb
Wind
Speed
1-5 mph
6-9 mph
10-12 mph
> 12 mph
White Non white White Nonwhite
Males Males Females Females
1.94 1.27 1.75 0.77
(46) (3) (10) (6)
2.14 3.30 1.95 1.77
(26) (6) (8) (20)
1.62 1.35 1.00 1.73
(8) (8) (2) (6)
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
{"} (0.) ,, , . .<0) ,.
Both
Sexes
1.77
(65)
2.11
(60)
1.51
(24)
0.0
— W
Table 0-2.
CHICAGO.
INFLUENCE OF WIND SPEED, SEX, AND RACE ON COHb
Wind
Speed
1-5 mph
6-9 mph
10-12 mph
^>i-2jnph
White Nonwhite White Nonwhite
Males Males Females Females
n.O 0.0 0.0 0.0
(0) (0) (0) (0)
2.12 2.44 1.88 2.60
(153) (20) (74) (3)
1.91 2.45 2.16 1.70
(27) (13) (18) (1)
1.82 1.90 1.99 1.90
(57) (4) (29) (2)
Males Females
o.o o.o
(0) (0)
2.15 1.91
(175) (77)
2.09 2.14
(41) (19)
1.82 1.98
(62) (11)
Both
Sexes
0 0
(0)
2 08
(252)
2 06
(51)
1 92
(102)
0-1
-------
Table 0-3.
DENVER
INFLUENCE OF WIND SPEED, SEX, AND RACE ON COHb
Wind
Speed
1-5 mph
6-9 mph
10-12 mph
> 12 mph
White Nonwhite White Nonwhite
Males Males Females Females
i i •• • — ' '
1.94 2.19 1.87 2.07
(95) (15) (40) (3)
2.06 2.31 1.86 1.79
(79) (15) (37) (7)
2.30 2.41 1.80 2.63
(83) (24) (31) (7)
2.34 2.90 1.77 1.94
(158) (28) (71) (7)
Males Females
1.97 1.88
(110) (43)
2.10 1.85
(95) (44)
2.32 1.96
(107) (38)
2.42 1.79
(187) (78)
Both
Sexes
1.95
(153)
2.02
(139)
2.05
(74)
2.27
(336)
Table 0-4.
DETROIT
INFLUENCE OF WIND SPEED, SEX, AND RACE ON COHb
Wind
Speed
1-5 mph
6-9 mph
10-12 mph
> 12 mph
1
White Nonwhite White Nonwhite
Males Males Females Females
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
(f>) (0) (0) (C>
1.76 1.70 0.0 0.0
(72) (3) (0) (0)
1.56 1.87 1.50 1.47
(478) (12) (124) (4)
1.74 1.95 1.08 1.17
(3<*4) (icu) U-o)
Males Females
0.0 0.0
(** V / rt\
-•; (w)
1.76 0.0
(75) (0)
1.57 1.50
(490) (128)
1.75 1.08
\JOOJ V-*-",
Both
Sexes
0.0
f n\
W/
1.76
(75)
1.62
(467)
1.53
1 v«-»-»/
0-2
-------
Table 0-5.
HONOLULU
INFLUENCE OF WIND SPEED, SEX, AND RACE ON COHb
Wind
Speed
1-5 mph
6-9 mph
10-12 mph
> 12 mph
White Npnwhite White Nonwhite
Males Males Females Females
1.37 1.97 0.70 0.0
(4) (6) (2) (0)
2.22 1.86 2.30 0.0
(4) (9) (1) (0)
1.65 1.54 1.30 1.32
(46) (75) (7) (4)
1.48 1.53 1.30 1.88
(109) (206) (16) (14)
Males Females
1.73 0.70
(10) (2)
1.97 2.30
(13) (1)
1 . 58 1 . 31
(121) (11)
1.51 1.57
(315) (30)
Both
Sexes
1.56
(12)
1.99
(14)
1.53
(73)
1.53
(404)
Table 0-6.
HOUSTON
INFLUENCE OF WIND SPEED, SEX, AND RACE ON COHb
Wind
Speed
1-5 mph
6-9 mph
10-12 raph
> 12 mph
Whipe Nonwhite White Nonwhite
Males Males Females Females
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
(0) (0) (0) (0)
1.53 1.50 1.34 1.10
(35) (3) (33) (2)
1.56 1.41 1.48 1.25
(59) (14) (10) (2)
1.90 1.22 4.14 0.0
(67) (4) (15) (0)
Males Females
0.0 0.0
(0) (0)
1.53 1.33
(38) (35)
1.53 1.44
(73) (12)
1.86 4.14
(71) (15)
Both
Sexes
0.0
(0)
1.43
(73)
1.79
(55)
1.93
(117)
0-3
-------
Table 0-7.
LOS ANGELES
INFLUENCE OF WIND SPEED, SEX, AND RACE ON COHb
Wind
Speed
1-5 mph
6-9 mph
10-12 mph
> 12 mph
White Nonwhite White Nonwhite
Males Males Females Females
2.40 2.50 2.27 2.16
(467) (60) (133) (14)
2.21 2.29 2.07 1.93
(525) (59) (239) (18)
1.68 1.85 1.52 1.43
(520) (63) (169) (10)
1.59 1.86 1.84 2.16
(294) (77) (42) (17)
Males Females
2.42 2.26
(527) (147)
2.22 2.06
(585) (257)
1.69 1.51
(583) (179)
1.65 1.92
(372) (60) _
Both
Sexes
2.38
(674)
2.17
(842)
1.64
(701)
1.70
(493}
Table 0-8.
MIAMI
INFLUENCE OF WIND SPEED, SEX, AND RACE ON COHb
1-5 mph
1
ll
6-9 mph
10-12 mph
> 12 mph
H
1.10 2.44 1.13 6.90
(2) (5) (3) (1)
1.35 1.39 1.03 l.*3
(131) (28) (28) (3)
1.41 1.35 0.80 0.0
(17) (2) (1) (0)
1.48 1.80 1.05 1.50
(103) (33) (36) (5)
2.06 2.57
(7^ (4)
i.3i i.U/
(159) (31)
1.40 0.80
(19) (1)
1.56 1.10
(136) (41)
2.25
(11)
i.3i
(190)
1.37
(20)
1.45
(177)
0-4
-------
Table 0-9.
MILWAUKEE
INFLUENCE OF WIND SPEED, SEX, AND RACE ON COHb
Wind
Speed
1-5 mph
6-9 mph
10-12 mph
> 12 mph
White Nonwhite White Nonwhite
Males Males Females Females
1.29 1.33 1.23 1.43
(84) (6^ (86) (51)
1.43 1.58 1.22 1.37
(224) (54) (302) (210)
1.60 1.18 1.26 1.19
(226) (43) (321) (215)
1.41 1.40 1.32 1.30
(204) (60) (296) (215)
Males Females
1.29 1.31
(91) (140)
1.46 1.28
(282) (516)
1.54 1.23
(270) (541)
1 . 41 1 . 31
(270) (515)
Both
Sexes
1.30
(232)
1.34
(800)
1.43
(555)
1.29
(1044)
Table 0-10.
NEW ORLEANS
INFLUENCE OF WIND SPEED, SEX, AND RACE ON COHb
Wind
Speed
1-5 mph
6-9 mph
10-12 mph
> 12 mph
White Nonwhite White Nonwhite
Males Males Females Females
2.05 1.86 1.85 0.0
(6) (17) (2) (0)
1.50 2.18 1.50 1.80
(16) (23) (6) (3)
1.80 1.87 2.10 1.40
(25) (44) (5) (7)
1.70 1.60 1.60 0.0
(2) (2) (1) (0>
Males Females
1.91 1.85
(23) (2)
1.90 1.60
(39) (9)
1.85 1.69
(69) (12)
1.65 1.60
(4) (1)
Both
Sexes
1.91
(25)
1.85
(48)
1.89
(69)
1.52
(17)
0-5
-------
Table 0-11.
NEW YORK CITY
INFLUENCE OF WIND SPEED, SEX, AND RACE ON COHb
Wind
Speed
1-5 mph
6-9 mph
10-12 mpb
> 12 mph
White Nonwhite White Nonwhite
Males Males Females Females
1.71 1.60 1.66 1.65
(166) (10) (33) (6)
1.55 1.42 1.22 1.34
(585) (41) (254) (28)
1.26 1.38 1.15 0.98
(222) (9) (93) (9)
1.45 1.70 1.29 1.32
(483) (25) (284) (41)
Males Females
1.71 1.66
(178) (39)
1.55 1-24
(628) (282)
1.27 1.14
(231) (102)
1.46 1.29
(509) (326)
Both
Sexes
1.70
(217)
1.45
(910)
1.30
(146)
1.35
(10221
Table 0-12.
PHOENIX
INFLUENCE OF WIND SPEED, SEX, AND RACE ON COHb
Wind
Speed
1-5 mph
6-9 mph
10-12 mph
> 12 mph
i -j
White Nonwhite White Nonwhite
Males Males Females Females
1.20 1.98 1.27 1.70
(12) (5) (8) (1)
1.66 1.62 1.29 0.55
(46) (17) (15) (2)
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
(C» (0) (0) (0)
1.21 1.34 1.20 1.05
<"m (10) (10) (2)
1 i i ~ i 'i ' • •• i . i - . . — , —
Males Females
1.43 1.32
(17) (9)
1.65 1.20
(63) (17)
0.0 0.0
(0) (0)
1.25 1.17
(29) (12)
Both
Sexes
1.39
(26)
i.bi
(80)
0.0
(0)
1.23
(41)
0-6
-------
Table 0-13.
ST. LOUIS
INFLUENCE OF WIND SPEED, SEX, AND RACE ON COHb
Wind
Speed
1-5 mph
6-9 mph
10-12 mph
> 12 mph
White Nonwhite White Nonwhite
Males Males Females Females
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
(0) (0^ (0) (0)
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
(0) (0) (ON (0)
1.73 1.57 1.52 1.80
(209) (3) (113) (1)
1.33 1.17 1.25 0.95
(230) (8) (105) (2)
Males Females
0.0 0.0
(0) (0)
0.0 0.0
(0) (0)
1.72 1.52
(212) (115)
1.33 1.24
(238) (108)
Both
Sexes
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
1.70
(215)
1.36
(458)
Table 0-14.
SALT LAKE CITY
INFLUENCE OF WIND SPEED, SEX, AND RACE ON COHb
Wind
Speed
1-5 mph
6-9 mph
10-12 mph
> 12 mph
White Nonwhite White Nonwhite
Males Males Females Females
1.38 1.70 1.33 1.10
(101) (1) (70) (1)
1.25 1.35 0.96 0.80
(49) (2) (31) (1)
1.53 1.25 1.39 2.15
(12) (2) (8) (2)
1.55 1.38 1.18 1.27
(188) (5) (68) (3)
Males Females
1.39 1.33
(102) (71)
1.26 0.96
(51) (32)
1 . 49 1 . 54
(14) (10)
1.54 1.18
(193) (71)
Both
Sexes
1.36
(173)
1.14
(83)
1.51
(24)
1.45
(264)
0-7
-------
Table 0-15.
SAN FRANCISCO
INFLUENCE OF WIND SPEED, SEX, AND RACE ON COHb
Wind
Speed
1-5 mph
6-9 mph
10-12 mph
> 12 mph
White Nonwhite White Nonwhite
Males Males Females Females
1.94 1-90 1.66 1.85
(44) (1) (20) (2)
1.62 1.82 1.38 1.60
(60) (5) (4D (*>
1.70 1.79 1.54 1.52
(183) (17) (71) . (5)
1.92 1.45 1.64 1.31
(124) (6) (70) (7)
Males Females
1.94 1.68
(45) (22)
1.63 1.40
(65) (45)
1.71 1.54
(202) (76)
1.89 1.61
(130) (77)
Both
Sexes
1.86
(67)
1.54
(110)
1.61 .
(188)
1.78
(297)
Table 0-16.
SEATTLE
INFLUENCE OF WIND SPEED, SEX, AND RACE ON COHb
Wind
Speed
1-5 mph
6-9 mph
10-12 mph
> 12 mph
White Nonwhite White Nonwhite
Males Males Females Females
1.88 2.06 1.63 0.0
(98) (5) (55) (0)
1.62 1.04 1.21 1.55
(191) (5) (86) (2)
1.97 1.50 1.71 1.40
C40') m r?9^ (I-)
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 j
(0) (0) (0) (0)
M-lcs Fcissles
1.89 1.63
(103) (55)
1.61 1.22
(196) (88)
1.95 1.70
f/.r>\ /1/"l\
0.0 0.0
(0) (0)
Both
Sexes -
1.80
(158)
1.49
(284)
1.83
/ c r\\
\ — ' S
1.94
(13)
i
0-8
-------
Table 0-17.
VERMONT - NEW HAMPSHIRE
INFLUENCE OF WIND SPEED, SEX, AND RACE ON COHb
Wind
Speed
1-5 mph
6-9 mph
10-12 mph
> 12 mph
White Nonwhite White Nonwhite
Males Males Females Females
1.55 0.0 1.17 0.0
(53) (0) (41) (0)
1.43 1.30 1.31 0.0
(267) (3) (112) (0)
1.32 0.79 1.37 2.30
(335) (11) (136) (1)
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
(0^ (0) (0) (0)
Males Females
1.55 1.17
(53) (41)
1 . 43 1 . 31
(270) (112)
1.30 1.38
(346) (137)
0.0 0.0
(0) (0)
Both
Sexes
1.38
(94)
1.39
(382)
1.66
(83)
1.25
(400)
Table 0-18.
WASHINGTON D. C.
INFLUENCE OF WIND SPEED, SEX, AND RACE ON COHb
Wind
Speed
1-5 mph
6-9 mph
10-12 mph
> 12 mph
White Nonwhite White Nonwhite
Males Males Females Females
2.23 1.50 1.36 2.00
(62) (1) (16) (4)
1.74 1.50 0.93 0.80
(77) (3) (153) (4)
1-30 1.72 1.52 1.70
(105) (16) (20) (2)
1-57 1.71 1.13 1.25
(260) (19) (96) (13)
Males Females
2.22 1.48
(63) (20)
1.73 0.93
(80) (157)
1 . 36 1 . 54
(123) (22)
1.58 1.14
(279) (109)
Both
Sexes
1.04
(83)
1.20
(237)
0.0
(0)
1.44
(534)
0-9
-------
Table P-l.
ANCHORAGE
INFLUENCE OF OCCUPATION (NONSMOKERS),
WIND SPEED, AND LOCATION ON COHb
Location and Wind Speed
Professional, Clerical
and Service Occupations
Occupations in Factories
Occupations near High
Levels of CO
Students
Housewives
Other Occupations
Airports
1-5 mph >5 mph
0.0 0.0
(0) (0)
0.0 0.0
(0) (0)
0.0 0.0
(0) (0)
0.0 0.0
(0) (0)
0.0 0.0
(0) (0)
0.0 0.0
(0) (0)
Urban
1-5 mph > 5 mph
0.0 0.0
(0) (0)
0.0 0.0
(0) (0)
2.60 0.0
(1) (0)
0.0 0.0
(0) (0)
0.0 1.80
(0) (1)
0.0 0.0
(0) (0)
Suburban
1-5 mph > 5 mph
1.64 1.92
(21) (13)
0.70 2.20
(1) (1)
1.77 1.15
(6) (2)
0.0 1.60
(0) (1)
0.0 0.0
(0) (0)
2.00 3.44
(7) (5)
Rural
1-5 mph > 5 mph
2.09 1.88
(7) (9)
1.60 2.35
(1) (2)
2.07 1.57
(7) (6)
1.10 1.65
(2) (22)
0.74 1.20
(5) (8)
1.42 3.22
(4) (8)
X
-------
Table P-2.
CHICAGO
INFLUENCE OF OCCUPATION (NONSMOKERS),
WIND SPEED, AND LOCATION ON COHb
Location and Wind Speed
ro
Professional, Clerical
and Service Occupations
Occupations in Factories
Occupations near High
Levels o : CO
Students
Housewives
Other Occupations
Airports
1-5 mph >5 mph.
0.0 2.35
(0) (17)
0.0 0.0
(0) (0)
0.0 2.46
(0) (10)
0.0 0.0
(0) (0)
0.0 0.0
(0) (0)
0.0 2.72
(0) (5)
Urban
1-5 mph >5 mph
0.0 2.48
(0) (45)
0.0 1.40
(0) (2)
0.0 2.34
(0) (8)
0.0 1.74
(0) (133)
0.0 1.85
(0) (2)
0.0 2.68
(0) (18)
Suburban
1-5 mph > 5 mph
0.0 2.04
(0) (73)
0.0 2.09
(0) (18)
0.0 1.90
(0) (6)
0.0 1.00
(0) (2)
0.0 1.59
(0) (15)
0.0 2.07
(0) (23)
Rural
1-5 nph > 5 mph
0.0 0.0
(0) (0)
0.0 0.0
(0) (0)
0.0 0.0
(0) (0)
0.0 0.0
(0) (0)
0.0 0.0
(0) (0)
0.0 0.0
(0) (0)
-------
Table P-3.
DENVER
INFLUENCE OF OCCUPATION (NONSMOKERS),
WIND SPEED, AND LOCATION ON COHb
Location and Wind Speed
Professional, Clerical
and Service Occupations
Occupations in Factories
Occupations near High
Levels of CO
Students
Housewives
Other Occupations
Airports
1-5 mph >5 mph
1.27 0.40
(3) (1)
0.0 0.0
(0) (0)
1.69 1.68
(33) (5)
0.0 0.0
(0) (0)
0.0 0.0
(0) (0)
0.0 0.0
(0) (0)
Urban
1-5 mph >5 mph
2.10 2.17
(31) (104)
3.15 2.56
(4) (16)
1.99 2.27
(14) (38)
2.34 2.23
(5) (35)
1.75 2.15
(13) (35)
1.85 2.47
(12) (93)
Suburban
1-5 mph > 5 mph
1.79 2.23
(8) (38)
1.90 1.62
(1) (5)
1.80 1.74
(1) (41)
2.70 1.52
(1) (41)
1.33 1.86
(3) (29)
2.32 2.03
(4) (11)
Rural t
1-5 mph > 5 mph 1
2.20 1.97
(1) (3)
0.0 1.50
(0) (1)
3.20 1.55
(1) (4)
0.0 0.0
(0) (0)
0.0 2.22
(0) (6)
1.97 2.04
(3) (9)
-------
Table P-4.
DETROIT
INFLUENCE OF OCCUPATION (NONSMOKERS),
WIND SPEED, AND LOCATION ON COHb
Location and Wind Speed
Professic nal, Clerical
and Servi ce Occupations
Occupations in Factories
Occupaticns near High
Levels of CO
Students
Housewives
Other Occupations
Airports
1-5 mph >5 mph
*
•1
0.0 0.0
;o> (0)
0.0 0.0
(0) (0)
0.0 0.0
(0) (0)
0.0 0.0
(0) (0)
0.0 0.0
(0) (0)
0.0 0.0
(0) (0)
Urban
1-5 mph >5 mph
0.0 1.76
(0) (250)
0.0 1.66
(0) (100)
0.0 2.04
(0) (30)
0.0 1.25
(0) (2)
0.0 0.0
(0) (0)
0.0 1.70
(0) (31)
Suburban
1-5 mph > 5 mph
0.0 1.45
(0) (415)
0.0 1.57
(0) (76)
0.0 1.62
(0) (33)
0.0 0.98
(0) (83)
0.0 1.66
(0) (49)
0.0 1.82
(0) (53)
Rural
1-5 nph > 5 mph
0.0 0.80
(0) (1)
0.0 0.0
(0) (0)
0.0 0.0
(0) (0)
0.0 0.0
(0) (0)
0.0 0.92
(0) (4)
0.0 1.45
(0) (2)
-o
-------
Table P-5.
HONOLULU
INFLUENCE OF OCCUPATION (NONSMOKERS),
WIND SPEED, AND LOCATION ON COHb
Location and Wind Speed
Professional, Clerical
and Service Occupations
Occupations in Factories
Occupations near High
Levels of CO
Students
Housewives
Other Occupations
Airports
1-5 mph >5 mph
0.0 0.0
(0) (0)
0.0 0.0
(0) (0)
0.0 0.0
(0) (0)
0.0 0.0
(0) (0)
0.0 0.0
(0) (0)
0.0 0.0
(0) (0)
Urban
1-5 mph >5 mph
1.50 1.57
(4) (99)
0.0 1.07
(0) (10)
1.43 1.67
(3) (90)
0.0 1.47
(0) (21)
0.0 1.24
(0) (5)
1.95 1.88
(2) (48)
Suburban
1-5 mph > 5 mph
1.00 1.48
(1) (42)
0.0 1.22
(0) (5)
1.70 1.35
(1) (32)
0.0 1.32
(0) (4)
0.0 1.30
(0) (4)
0.0 1.44
(0) (31)
Rural
1-5 mph > 5 tnph
0.0 1.26
(0) (13)
0.0 1.42
(0) (4)
0.0 1.69
(0) (15)
0.0 0.0
(0) (0)
0.0 1.43
(0) (3)
0.0 1.56
(0) (16)
01
-------
Table P-6.
HOUSTON
INFLUENCE OF OCCUPATION (NONSMOKERS),
WIND SPEED, AND LOCATION ON COHb
Location and Wind Speed
-o
i
cr>
Professional, Clerical
and Service Occupations
Occupaticns in Factories
Occupatic ns near High
Levels oi CO
Students
Housewivc s
Other Occupations
Airports
1-5 mph >5 mph
0.0 0.0
(0) (0)
0.0 0.0
(0) (0)
0.0 0.95
(0) (15)
3.0 0.0
(0) (0)
0.0 0.0
(0) (0)
0.0 0.0
(0) (0)
Urban
1-5 mph > 5 mph
0.0 1.70
(0) (81)
0.0 1.56
(0) (9)
0.0 1.68
(0) (18)
0.0 1.12
(0) (4)
0.0 1.01
(0) (7)
0.0 2.23
(0) (20)
Suburban
1-5 mph > 5 mph
0.0 1.76
(0) (11)
0.0 1.40
(0) (1)
0.0 1.20
(0) (1)
0.0 0.78
(0) (15)
0.0 1.25
(0) (17)
0.0 0.0
(0) (0)
Rural
1-5 ciph > 5 mph
0.0 0.86
(0) (9)
0.0 0.70
(0) (1)
0.0 1.20
(0) (1)
0.0 1.65
(0) (10)
0.0 0.0
(0) (0)
0.0 0.93
(0) (7)
-------
Table P-7.
LOS ANGELES
INFLUENCE OF OCCUPATION (NONSMOKERS),
WIND SPEED, AND LOCATION ON COHb
Location and Wind Speed
Professional, Clerical
and Service Occupations
Occupations in Factories
Occupations near High
Levels of CO
Students
Housewives
Other Occupations
Airports
1-5 mph >5 .mph
0.0 1.57
(0) (184)
0.0 1.64
(0) (11) '
0.0 1.70
(0) (7)
0.0 0.0
(0) (0)
0.0 0.0
(0) (0)
0.0 1.41
(0) (11)
Urban
1-5 mph > 5 mph
2.43 1.85
(364) (478)
2.85 1.83
(66) (146) .
2.11 2.09
(58) (63)
0.0 2.12
(0) (16)
0.0 1.91
(0) (40)
2.31 1.82
(68) (173)
Suburban
1-5 mph > 5 mph
2.05 1.87
(53) (434)
2.03 1.79
(11) (49)
1.91 2.13
(15) (27)
2.10 2.01
(3) (150)
2.25 1.78
(6) (56)
2.60 2.02
(21) (113)
Rural
1-5 mph > 5 mph
0.0 1.80
(0) (4)
0.0 0.0
(0) (0)
0.0 3.00
(0) (27)
0.0 0.0
(0) (0)
0.0 0.0
(0) (0)
2.90 0.0
(1) (0)
-------
Table P-8.
MIAMI
INFLUENCE OF OCCUPATION (NONSMOKERS) ,
WIND SPEED, AND LOCATION ON COHb
Location and Wind Speed
Professional, Clerical
and Service Occupations
Occupations in Factories
Occupations near High
Levels of CO
Students
Housewive ;
Other Occipations
Airports
T.-5 mph >5 mph
0.0 1.30
(0) (2)
C.O 0.0
(0) (0)
C.O 0.83.
(0) (15)
C.O 0.0
(0) (0)
C.O 0.0
(0) (0)
0.0 0.0
(0) (0)
Urban
1-5 mph >5 mph
3.07 1.35
(3) (107)
0.0 1.63
(0) (6)
1.40 1.65
(2) (67)
0.0 1.51
(0) (15)
0.0 1.08
(0) (5)
3.30 1.36
(3) (45)
Suburban
1-5 mph > 5 mph
0.0 1.45
(0) (26)
0.0 0.0
(0) (0)
0.0 1.19
(0) (10)
0.0 1.20
(0) (22)
0.80 0.84
(1) (9)
0.40 1.14
(1) (13)
Rural
1-5 mph > 5 mph
0.0 0.0
(0) (0)
0.0 0.0
(0) (0)
0.0 0.85
(0) (2)
0.0 0.0
(0) (0)
0.0 0.90
(0) (1)
0.0 0.0
(0) (0)
f
00
-------
Table P-9.
MILWAUKEE
INFLUENCE OF OCCUPATION (NONSMOKERS),
WIND SPEED, AND LOCATION ON COHb
Location and Wind Speed
Professional, Clerical
and Service Occupations
Occupations in Factories
Occupations near High
Levels of CO
Students
Housewives
Other Occupations
Airports
1-5 mph >5 mph
0.0 0.0
(0) (0)
0.0 0.0
(0) (0)
0.0 0.0
(0) (0)
0.0 0.0
(0) (0)
0.0 0.0
(0) (0)
0.0 0.0
(0) (0)
Urban
1-5 mph >5 mph
0.0 0.0
(0) (0)
0.0 0.0
(0) (0)
0.0 0.0
(0) (0)
0.0 0.0
(0) (0)
0.0 0.0
(0) (0)
1.45 1.41
(51) (603)
Suburban
1-5 mph > 5 mph
0.0 0.0
(0) (0)
0.0 0.0
(0) (0)
0.0 0.0
(0) (0)
0.0 0.0
(0) (0)
0.0 0.0
(0) (0)
0.93 1.31
(43) (255)
Rural
1-5 mph > 5 mph
0.0 0.0
(0) (0)
0.0 0.0
(0) (0)
0.0 0.0
(0) (0)
0.0 0.0
(0) (0)
0.0 0.0
(0) (0)
2.00 1.50
(1) (24)
-------
Table P-10.
NEW ORLEANS
INFLUENCE OF OCCUPATION (NONSMOKERS),
WIND SPEED, AND LOCATION ON COHb
Location and Wind Speed
-o
i
Professional, Clerical
and Ser 'ice Occupations
Occupations in Factories
Occupations near High
Levels of CO
Student:
Housewives
Other 0< cupations
Airports
1-5 mph >5 mph
0.0 0.0
(0) (0)
0.0 0.0
(0) (0)
0.0 0.0
(0) (0)'
0.0 0.0
(0) (0)
0.0 0.0
(0) (0)
0.0 0.0
(0) (0)
Urban
1-5 mph >5 mph
2.05 1.68
(2) (6)
1.40 1.82
(l) (4)
2.20 1.54
(1) (16)-
0.0 1.76
(0) (9)
1.85 1.75
(2) (4)
1.99 1.92
(7) (20)
Suburban
1-5 mph > 5 mph
2.00 1.70
(1) (4)
1.60 1.57
(1) (4)
2.00 1.75
(2) (2)
0.0 1.55
(0) (2)
0.0 1.43
(0) (3)
1.95 1.87
(2) (12)
Rural
1-5 mph > 5 inph
0.0 3.05
(0) (4)
0.0 1.37
(0) (4)
0.0 1.37
(0) (4)
0.0 0.60
(0) (1)
0.0 1.97
(0) (3)
1.90 2.06
(2) (14)
-------
Table P-ll.
NEW YORK CITY
INFLUENCE OF OCCUPATION (NONSMOKERS),
WIND SPEED, AND LOCATION ON COHb
Location and Wind Speed
Professional, Clerical
and Service Occupations
Occupations in Factories
Occupations near High
Levels of CO
Students
Housewives
Other Occupations
Airports
1-5 mph >5 mph
0.0 2.35
(0) (11)
0.0 2.10
(0) (1)
0.0 2.40
(0) (23)
0.0 0.0
(0) (0)
0.0 0.0
(0) (0)
0.0 1.90
(0) (3)
Urban
1-5 mph >5 mph
1.70 1.39
(156) (628)
1.40 1.75
(1) (56)
1.68 1.36
(16) (102)
3.00 1.22
(1) (5)
1.40 1.60
(1) (3)
1.66 1.87
(13) (196)
Suburban
1-5 mph > 5 mph
1.61 1.27
(17) (576)
1.70 1.66
(1) (10)
0.0 1.22
(0) (62)
0.0 1.18
(0) (146)
0.0 1.12
(0) (83)
1.80 1.27
(8) (135)
Rural
1-5 ciph > 5 nph
0.0 0.0
(0) (0)
0.0 0.0
(0) (0)
0.0 0.0
(0) (0)
0.0 0.0
(0) (0)
0.0 0.0
(0) (0)
0.0 0.0
(0) (0)
-------
Table P-12.
PHOENIX
INFLUENCE OF OCCUPATION (NONSMOKERS),
WIND SPEED, AND LOCATION ON COHb
Location and Wind Speed
Professional, Clerical
and Servi ce Occupations
Occupations in Factories
Occupations near High
Levels of CO
Students
Housewives
Other Occupations
1-5
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
Airports
mph >5 mph
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)'
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
Urban
1-5 mph >5 mph
1.11
(8)
1.00
(1)
1.20
(1)
3.25
(2)
1.47
(3)
1.40
(2)
1.18
(22)
2.04
(5)
1.39
(15)
1.40
(8)
1.15
(8)
2.07
(25)
Suburban
1-5 mph > 5 mph
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
1.70
(1)
1.50
(2)
1.17
(3)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
1.23
(7)
0.0
(0)
0.90
(1)
Rural
1-5 inph >
0.80
(1)
0.0
(0)
0.70
(1)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
1.10
(1)
5 inph
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.80
(1)
0.0
(0)
0.70
(1)
1.64
(5)
-------
TabJe P-13.
ST. LOUIS
INFLUENCE OF OCCUPATION (NONSMOKERS),
WIND SPEED, AND LOCATION ON COHb
Location and Wind Speed
I
GO
Professional, Clerical
and Service Occupations
Occupations in Factories
Occupations near High
Levels of CO
Students
Housewives
Other Occupations
Airports
1-5 mph >5 mph
0.0 1.49
(0) (22)
0.0 0.0
(0) (0)
0.0 1.67
(0) (34)
0.0 0.0
(0) (0)
0.0 0.0
(0) (0)
0.0 1.66
(0) (27)
Urban
I- 5 mph > 5 mph
0.0 1.37
(0) (154)
0.0 1.45
(0) (10)
0.0 1.61
(0) (26)
0.0 1.54
(0) (18)
0.0 1.83
(0) (3)
0.0 1.49
(0) (40)
Suburban
1-5 mph > 5 mph
0.0 1.33
(0) (119)
0.0 1.81
(0) (10)
0.0 2.46
(0) (12)
0.0 1.45
(0) (18)
0,0 1.45
(0) (84)
0.0 1.42
(0) (24)
Rural
1-5 mph > 5 nph
0.0 0.0
(0) (0)
0.0 0.0
(0) (0)
0.0 1.25
(0) (2)
0.0 0.0
(0) (0)
0.0 1.35
(0) (8)
0.0 1.00
(0) (2)
-------
Table P-14. '
SALT LAKE CITY
INFLUENCE OF OCCUPATION (NONSMOKERS),
WIND SPEED, AND LOCATION ON COHb
Location and Wind Speed
Professional, Clerical
and Service Occupations
Occupations in Factories
Occupations near High
Levels of CO
Students
Housewives
Other Occupations
Airports
1-5 mph >5 mph
0.0 0.0
(0) (0)
0.0 0.0
(0) (0)
o.o o.o •
(0) (0)
0.0 0.0
(0) (0)
0.0 0.0
(0) (0)
0.0 0.0
(0) (0)
Urban
1-5 mph > 5 mph
1.59 1.33
(10) (33)
1.35 1.70
(2) (6)
3.20 2.00
(2) (8)
1.37 1.15
(71) (6)
2.10 1.55
(1) (4)
0.85 1.44
(2) (5)
Suburban
1-5 mph > 5 mph
0.94 1.69
(17) (13)
0.0 1.20
(0) (1)
1.45 2.80
(2) (1)
0.0 1.75
(0) (26)
1.00 1.60
(5) (2)
1.07 1.70
(8) (3)
Rural
1-5 mph > 5 mph
1.36 1.14
(9) (98)
0.75 2.05
(2) (13)
1.51 1.89
(10) (37)
0.0 0.63
(0) (3)
1.50 1.05
(12) (27)
1.50 1.17
(18) (72)
-o
I
-------
Table P-15.
SAN FRANCISCO
INFLUENCE OF OCCUPATION (NONSMOKERS),
WIND SPEED, AND LOCATION ON COHb
Location and Wind Speed
Professional, Clerical
and Service Occupations
Occupations in Factories
Occupations near High
Levels of CO
Students
Housewives
Other Occupations
Airports
1-5 mph >5 mph
0.0 0.0
(0) (0)
0.0 0.0
(0) (0)
0.0 0.0
(0) (0)
0.0 0.0
(0) (0)
0.0 0.0
(0) (0)
0.0 0,0
(0) (0)
Urban
1-5 mph >5 mph
1.77 1.66
(30) (345)
0.0 1.99
(0) (23)
1.91 1.69
(14) (74)
1.96 2.15
(8) (19)
1.90 1.29
(3) (23)
2.25 1.86
(4) (64)
Suburban
1-5 mph > 5 mph
1.70 1.71
(2) (7)
1.50 1.10
(1) (1)
1.00 1.11
(1) (12)
0.0 1.37
(0) (4)
1.70 1.93
(1) (3)
0.0 1.30
(0) (3)
Rural
1-5 ciph > 5 tnph
0.0 0.0
(0) (0)
0.0 0.0
(0) (0)
0.0 0.0
(0) (0)
0.0 0.0
(0) (0)
0.0 0.0
(0) (0)
0.0 1.40
(0) (1)
I
Ol
-------
Table P-16.
SEATTLE
INFLUENCE OF OCCUPATION (NONSMOKERS),
WIND SPEED, AND LOCATION ON COHb
Location and Wind Speed
Professional, Clerical
and Service Occupations
Occupations in Factories
Occupations near High
Levels of CO
Students
Housewives
Other Occupations
Airports
1-5 mph >5 mph
0.0 1.70
(0) (9)
0.0 1.20
(0) (1)
0.0 1.47
(0) (32)
0.0 0.0
(0) (0)
0.0 0.0
(0) (0)
0.0 1.10
(0) (1)
Urban
1-5 mph >5 mph
1.84 1.62
(58) (119)
1.55 1.62
(4) (8)
2.09 1.67.
(14) (35)
1.95 1.48
(6) (23)
1.59 1.48
(16) (13)
1.97 1.35
(26) (20)
Suburban
1-5 mph > 5 tnph
1.50 1.24
(16) (35)
0.60 1.44
(1) (5)
1.80 1.63
(1) (7)
0.0 1.30
(0) (2)
1.30 1.20
(2) (4)
1.93 2.07
(3) (21)
Rural
1-5 mph > 5 inph
1.80 0.0
(1) (0)
0.0 0.0
(0) (0)
0.0 1.80
(0) (2)
0.0 0.60
(0) (1)
0.0 0.0
(0) (0)
0.0 0.0
(0) (0)
-------
Table P-17.
VERMONT - NEW HAMPSHIRE
INFLUENCE OF OCCUPATION (NONSMOKERS),
WIND SPEED, AND LOCATION ON COHb
Location and Wind Speed
Professional, Clerical
and Service Occupations
Occupations in Factories
Occupations near High
Levels of CO
Students
Housewives
Other Occupations
Airports
1-5 mph >5 mph
0.0 0.0
(0) (0)
0.0 0.0
(0) (0)
0.0 0.0
(0) (0)
0.0 0.0
(0) (0)
0.0 0.0
(0) (0)
0.0 0.0
(0) (0)
Urban
1-5 mph >5 mph
1.17 1.65
(26) (74)
0.0 1.94
(0) (11)
2.19 1.54
(9) (7)
0.0 1.12
(0) (11)
1.00 1.26
(3) (13)
1.47 1.57
(H) (13)
Suburban
1-5 mph > 5 mph
1.25 1.27
(2) (100)
0.0 1.27
(0) (6)
0.0 1.55
(0) (13)
1.00 1.17
(1) (341)
1.02 1.23
(4) (34)
1.50 1.49
(1) (30)
Rural
1-5 mph > 5 mph
1.38 1.32
(13) (58)
1.52 1.42
(4) (H)
1.75 2.06
(4) (5)
1.25 1.72
(2) (9)
1.27 1.44
(6) (46)
Io36 1.82
(5) (30)
-o
I
-------
Table P-18.
WASHINGTON D. C.
INFLUENCE OF OCCUPATION (NONSMOKERS),
WIND SPEED, AND LOCATION ON COHb
Location and Wind Speed
-o
i
«j
oo
Professioi al, Clerical
and Service Occupations
Occupatiors in Factories
Occupations near High
Levels of CO
Students
Housewives
Other Occupations
Airports
'.,-5 mph >5 mph
0.0
CO)
0.0
(0)
c.o
(0)
c.o
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
Urban
1-5 mph >
1.93
(11)
0.0
(0)
3.00
(2)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
2.12
(6)
5 mph
1.41
(183)
1.20
(1)
2.11
(13)
1.80
(D
0.90
(D
1.49
(14)
Suburban
1-5 mph > 5 mph
1.39
(14)
0.90
(D
1.50
(1)
0.0
(0)
1.50
(2)
2.30
(42)
1.44
(283)
1.66
(12)
1.60
(36)
0.89
(130)
1.00
(23)
1.37
(44)
1-5
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
0.0
(0)
Rural
mph > 5 mph
0.90
(2)
1.10
(D
1.70
(1)
0.0
(0)
0.98
(5)
1.56
(10)
------- |