United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Environmental Sciences Research
Laboratory
Research Triangle Park NC 27711
EPA GOO ? 80 070
Apni 1980
Research and Development
Mathematical
Techniques for
X-ray Analyzers

-------
                 RESEARCH REPORTING SERIES


Research reports of the Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, have been grouped into nine series. These nine broad cate-
gories were established to facilitate further development and application of en-
vironmental technology. Elimination  of traditional  grouping was consciously
planned to foster technology transfer and a maximum interface in related fields.
The nine series are:

    1. Environmental Health Effects Research

    2. Environmental Protection Technology

    3. Ecological Research

    4. Environmental Monitoring

    5. Socioeconomic Environmental Studies

    6. Scientific  and Technical Assessment Reports  (STAR)

    7. Interagency Energy-Environment Research and Development

    8. "Special"  Reports

    9. Miscellaneous Reports

This report has been assigned to the  ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION TECH-
NOLOGY series. This series describes research performed to develop and dem-
onstrate  instrumentation,  equipment,  and methodology to repair or prevent en-
vironmental degradation from point and non-point sources of pollution. This work
provides  the new or improved technology required for the control and treatment
of pollution sources to meet environmental quality standards.
This document is available to the public through the National Technical Informa-
tion Service, Springfield, Virginia 22161.

-------
                                                    EPA-600/2-80-070
                                                    April 1980
     MATHEMATICAL TECHNIQUES FOR X-RAY ANALYZERS
                         by
       Robin P. Gardner and Kuruvilla Verghese
Center for Engineering Applications of Radioisotopes
           North Carolina State University
           Raleigh, North Carolina  27650
                 Grant No. R-802759
                   Project Officer
                    T. G. Dzubay
     Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Division
     Environmental Sciences Research Laboratory
        Research Triangle Park, N. C.  27711
     ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES RESEARCH LABORATORY
         OFFICE OF RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
        U. S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
        RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK, N. C.  27711

-------
                                 DISCLAIMER
     This report has been reviewed by the Environmental Sciences Research
Laboratory, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, and approved for publica-
tion*  Approval does not signify that the contents necessarily reflect the
views and policies of the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, nor does
mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or
recommendation for use.
                                     ii

-------
                                  ABSTRACT

     A research program was initiated with the overall objective of develop-
ing mathematical techniques and subsequent computer software to process
energy-dispersive X-ray fluorescence spectra for elemental analyses of air-
borne particulate matter collected on filters.  The research concerned two
areas:  (1) determination of characteristic X-ray intensities and (2)
determination of elemental amounts from the known characteristic X-ray intens-
ities.  In the first area, efforts primarily concentrated on developing and
implementing the library, linear least-squares method and included the two
common non-linear aspects of XRF pulse-height spectra:  excitation source
background and pulse pile up.  A detector response function model was also
developed for Si(Li) detectors to alleviate the necessity for obtaining and
storing the extensive complete library spectra for every element of interest.
This approach gave improved accuracy, greatly reduced the experimental effort
required, and was capable of accounting for variations in detector calibra-
tion and resolution without requiring extensive additional experimental
effort.

     In the second research area, the fundamental parameters method was
developed by Monte Carlo simulation.  Data were collected for several shapes
of particles deposited on filters.  Empirical correction factors for various
practical cases of interest based on these simulations are reported.  In
addition some more general Monte Carlo simulations were performed for a
number of cases.  The conditions treated included monoenergetic photon (radio-
isotope) exciting sources; continuous (X-ray machine) photon exciting sources;
homogeneous samples of arbitrary thickness; primary, secondary, and tertiary
fluorescence in multi-component samples; and the inclusion of source and
characteristic radiation scattering effects.

     This report was submitted in fulfillment of Grant No. R-802759 by North
Carolina State University under the partial sponsorship of the U.S. Environ-
mental Protection Agency.  This report covers a period from May 15, 1974, to
May 14, 1979, and work was completed as of May 14, 1979.
                                     iii

-------
                                    CONTENTS
Abstract	    iii
Figures	     vi
Tables	viii
Acknowledgements  	     ix

     1.   Introduction  	      1
     2.   Conclusions	      2
     3.   Recommendations	      3
     4.   Determination of X-Ray Intensities 	      4
     5.   Determination of Elemental Amounts 	      6

References  	      7

Appendix: List of Reports, Theses, and Publications
          Either  Entirely or Partially Supported by
          this Grant	      7

-------
                                     FIGURES

No.

1    X-ray spectrum containing eight elements  excited with  a
     titanium secondary fluorescer XRF system	
     Residuals obtained from the X-ray "y spectrum shown in
     Figure 1 for various simulated errors  after  least-
     squares analysis 	    6

     Case 1.  Good statistics.   X-ray spectra  and residuals  for
     relative amounts of backscatter, Cr, Mn,  and Fe  in the
     ratios 1.00, 1.00, 0.05, and 1.00 analyzed without the
     Mn library spectrum	    7
     Case 1.   Good statistics.   X-ray spectra and residuals  for
     relative amounts of backscatter, Cr,  Mn, and Fe in the
     ratios 1.00, 1.00, 0.05, and 1.00 analyzed with the
     Mn library spectrum	
     Case 2.   Poor statistics.   X-ray spectra and residuals for
     relative amounts of backscatter, Cr,  Mn, and Fe in the
     ratios 1.00,  1.00,  0.05,  and 1.00 analyzed without the
     Mn library spectrum	    8

     Case 2.   Poor statistics.   X-ray spectra and residuals for
     relative amounts of backscatter, Cr,  Mn, and Fe in the
     ratios 1.00,  1.00,  0.05,  and 1.00 analyzed with the
     Mn library spectrum	    8

     Comparison of an experimental high counting rate spectrum of
     55Fe with that predicted  by parabolic and polynomial
     approximated  pulse  shapes	10

    Monte  Carol-predicted photon spectra  from the Ag K-ot x-ray
     (22.163  keV)  scattered  from a 5  mm thick Al target	11

    Comparison of the observed  backscatter regions of the X-ray
    spectrum from a  1(*9Cd source from a 5 mm thick Al sample
    with that  predicted from Monte Carlo-generated shape
    standards	
                                       VI

-------
                               FIGURES (continued)

10   Illustration of the four major spectral features of the two
     K-0! X rays of gallium in a Si (Li) spectrum	  13

11   The response function model compared to the experimental
     pulse-height spectrum for manganese	  14

12   The response function model compared to the experimental
     pulse-height spectrum for nickel 	  14

13   The response function model compared to the experimental
     pulse-height spectrum for gallium	15

14   The response function model compared to the experimental
     pulse-height spectrum for arsenic	15

15   Variation of sulfur enhancement with layer thickness
     and sphere diameter for various calcium compounds	17

16   Schematic diagram of the arrangement and nomenclative of the
     rectangular secondary source target and circular sample in
     relation to the circular detector and collimator for the
     Monte Carlo simulation of a secondary fluorescer EDXRF
     system	21

17   A typical experimental secondary source intensity
     distribution	21

18   Monte Carlo simulation and experimental results for the
     relative intensities from a pure nickel sample at various
     angles  for the Case l(a) and Case 2(b) system
     parameters given in Table 1	  22

19   Monte Carlo simulation and experimental results for
     the relative intensities from pure nickel, pure iron,
     and pure chromium samples at various angles  for the
     Case 3  system parameters given in Table 1	22

20   Monte Carol simulation and experimental results for the
     relative intensities from a 42 percent nickel - 58 per
     cent iorn binary sample at various angles  for the Case
     3  system parameters given in Table 1	23
                                        VI1

-------
                                     TABLES

No.                                                                   Page

1    Results of a library least-squares analysis on a sample	5

2    Results of a library least-squares analysis for two
     simulated particulate spectra containing chromium,
     manganese, and iron	6

3    Comparison of intensities predicted by the Monte Carlo
     simulation and the explicit analytical relationships 	 19

4    Comparison of relative intensities for Honte Carlo and
     numerical calculations	20
                                     Vlll

-------
                                ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

     R.K.  Stevens,   T.G.   Dzubay  of  the  Environmental  Sciences  Research
Laboratory,  U.S.  Environmental  Protection Agency and  D.  Rickel  of  Northrop
Services, Inc. are gratefully acknowledged for the guidance and help that they
provided during the conduct of this research.

     The  following   graduate   students  contributed  significantly  to  this
research:  Alan R.  Hawthorne,  Faruk Arinc, Lucian Wielopolski,  and Joseph M.
Doster.
                                        IX

-------
                                  SECTION  1

                                 INTRODUCTION

     Energy-dispersive X-ray fluorescence  (EDXRF) has only been recently
developed as a tool for elemental analysis.  The use of this principle has
probably become of interest largely due to the advent of the high resolution
Si(Li) detectors.  Combining these detectors with modern multichannel analy-
zers allows one to accumulate characteristic X-ray pulse-height spectra of
many elements simultaneously that are resolved from one another^  Therefore,
the X-ray analyst interested in  EDXRF analysis must be concerned with computational
procedures for determining characteristic  X-ray intensities for pulse-height
energy spectra.

     A technique that was developed some time ago for the determination of
radioisotope amounts in mixtures from their gamma-ray pulse-height spectra is
the library least-squares method (1,2).  The primary difference between the
radioisotope gamma-ray application and the photon-excited, energy-dispersive
X-ray fluorescence intensity application is that the presence of the exciting
source in the X-ray fluorescence case gives rise to spectral features that do
not obey the basic library linear least-squares assumption. This basic assumption
Is that the unknown spectrum is  a linear combination of all the individual or
pure library spectra for the elements involved.  This difference was first
addressed by Trombka and Schmadebeck (3) for the X-ray fluorescence analysis
of thick, homogeneous samples that might be encountered in space exploration
studies.  In the present work (4,5) it is  addressed for the X-ray fluorescence
analysis of airborne particulates collected on filters and the library least-
squares method is developed and  demonstrated for this case.

     One of the major problems associated  with any type of X-ray fluorescence
analysis is that one must often  account for sample matrix effects.  The
intensity of the characteristic  X-ray from a given element is a function of
all the other elements in the sample matrix through the combined phenomena of
enhancement and absorption.  The present research addressed this problem
specifically for airborne particulates collected on filters (6,7) and for
more general cases such as for homogeneous and heterogeneous samples.

     Since most of the work described here has been published in the open
literature, the present report has been shortened by eliminating the details
that can be found there.  All of the published work that has been either
entirely or partially supported  by this grant is listed in the Appendix.

-------
                                  SECTION 2

                                 CONCLUSIONS

     Two major mathematical methods have been developed and tested for the
EDXRF analysis of airborne participates collected on filters:  (1) the library
least-squares analysis of characteristic X-ray pulse-height spectra for
determining pure element intensities and (2) the Monte Carlo simulation of
characteristic X-ray intensities from particulates of various sizes, shape
factors, and compositions for determining elemental amounts from characteristic
X-ray intensities.  As a result of this work the library least-squares analysis
method is now being routinely used by the Environmental Sciences Research
Laboratory in the analysis of about 10,000 samples per year.

     In addition to these two major mathematical methods, other models have
been developed that are useful for certain analysis conditions.  In the
determination of characteristic. X-ray intensities these include:  (1)  Monte
Carlo simulation of the sample scattered exciting photon radiation, (2) a
model and method for accounting for pulse pile up, and (3) a model for simu-
lating pure element characteristic X-ray pulse-height spectra based on a
model for the Si(Li) response function.  In the simulation of characteristic
X-ray intensities from known elemental compositions these include:  (1) Monte
Carlo simulation of discrete photon energy radioisotope exciting sources for
homogeneous samples, (2) Monte Carlo simulation of continous and discrete
energy X-ray machine exciting sources for homogeneous samples, and (3) the
development of a simple semi-empirical model for the prediction of X-ray
intensities from particulate and heterogeneous samples that are simply
 characterized.

-------
                                  SECTION 3

                               RECOMMENDATIONS

     It is recommended that the library least-squares method based on the
simple model of the pure element library spectra obtained via the model of
the Si(Li) response function be implemented for the determination of charac-
teristic X-ray intensities for the EDXRF analysis of airborne participates
collected on filters.

     It is also recommended that matrix correction factors be generated by
Monte Carlo simulation for cases of general interest that can be identified
for the same application.  The methods and subsequent computer programs have
been developed and are available to accomplish these tasks.

     Additional work is required to delineate the fundamental processes that
govern the Si(Li) response function and obtain a more fundamental model for
it.

-------
                                   SECTION 4

                      DETERMINATION OF X-RAY INTENSITIES
      The library least-squares method for the determination of characteristic X-ray
 pulse-height intensities has been developed for photon excitation of airborne
 participates collected on filters (4,5).   In this case the exciting source
 radiation is scattered almost entirely by the filter and can be considered to
 have a constant shape.  Different filter  thicknesses can be assumed to only
 alter the intensity of the exciting source scattered spectrum. Therefore,  the
 exciting source scattered spectrum can be obtained from a clean filter and
 treated as a separate pure library spectrum.  This is shown to be a practical
 and accurate method of treating the exciting source scattered radiation in the
 case of airborne particulates on filters.  For the more general case where the
 shape of the exciting source scattered radiation varies with sample composi-
 tion, Monte Carlo simulation of the scattered portion of the spectrum has  been
 developed and demonstrated for a wide variety of homogeneous samples (8,9).

      There are a number of minor problems associated with applying the library
 least-squares method.  These include:  (1) statistical counting rate fluctu-
 ations, (2) gain shift, (3) zero shift, and (4) missing library spectra.
 These problems have been studied by simulation techniques.  In the first study
 the first three problems were examined for eight elements excited by a titan-
 ium secondary fluorescer XRF system.  The results of this study are given  in
 Table 1 and are shown in Figures 1 and 2.  It is clear from these results  that
 the effect of even small gain and zero shifts are very dramatic and one must
 minimize electronic drifts of this type if the method is to yield accurate
 results.

      In a second study the problem of detecting missing library spectra was ex-
 amined  by simulation methods.   Spectra for the three elements chromium, mangan-
 ese,  and iron in various relative amounts and for various levels of counting
 statistics were simulated by appropriate  use of the existing library least-
 squares  method  with spectra.   The results are given in Table 2 and in Figures
 3  through 6.  From these results one may  conclude that:  (1) the reduced chi-
 square value  is an accurate indicator that elements have been missed if those
 elements  represent about their equal share of the total spectrum, (2) the
 predicted  standard deviations  for each elemental amount are good estimates
 of the errors Involved  if the  controlling source of error is the statistical
 fluctuations of the  counting  rates and the chi-square value is close to unity,
 and (3)  the residuals  of the least-squares analysis are a very sensitive vis-
 ual indicator of missed  elements.   It would probably be quite easy to develop
a quantitative  mathematical  treatment of  the visual indication given by the
 residuals based on the  counting  rate differences in adjacent channels.  How-
ever, a suggested  alternative  (5)  is to first use all available library

-------
spectra in an Initial  "screening" least-squares analysis.  Those library
spectra that give negative amounts or amounts smaller than some prescribed
value are omitted and  the least-squares analysis is performed again.
      TABLE  1.   RESULTS OF A LIBRARY LEAST-SQUARES ANALYSIS OF A SAMPLE
Element
                Amount
             Relative standard deviations (%)
)  Simulation A*
Simulation B*
Reduced  chi—square values:   0.964
                          75.63
Simulation C*
Argon
Aluminum
Silicon
Phosphorus
Sulfur
Chlorine
Potassium
Calcium
Lead
0.434
3.098
6.653
0.028
6.659
0.332
1.001
1.460
11.721
0.508
6.135
1.291
106. 781
1.055
4.989
1.070
0.657
10. 903
0.569
4.476
1.239
11.789
1.525
5.033
1.027
0.732
2. 648
0.512
6.554
1.282
194,391
0.981
4. 284
1.089
0.669
253.989
                        4.75
 *Simulations A,  B, and C are when errors are due only to statistical counting
  rate fluctuations, a 1 percent gain shift, and a 0.2 channel zero shift,
  respectively.
                    •»  te 500 -
                    u  n ooo -
                    a
                    8!
                    3
                       5 500 -
                                 26     51     ?«
                                     CHANNEL NUMBER.
                                                         130
 Figure 1.   X-ray spectrum containing eight elements excited with a titanium
            secondary fluorescer XRF system.

-------
                          3 -
                     UJ
                     10
                     z
                     o
                      UJ
                      o
D


I

Z
                         -3
                         25 -
                        -25
                      in    8
                             SIMULATION A: COUNTING  RATE FLUCTUATIONS,
                4-
4-
       SIMULATION  B:  GAIN  SHIFT
       Of
                                4-
                             SIMULATION  C:  ZERO  SHIFT OF 0.2 CHANNEL.
                                21    42    63   84    105

                                      CHANNEL NUMBER, i
                                      126
 Figure 2.  Residuals  obtained from the X-ray y  spectrum shown in Figure 1
            for various  simulated errors after least-squares analysis.
         TABLE 2.  RESULTS  OF A LIBRARY LEAST-SQUARES  ANALYSIS FOR TWO
    SIMULATED PARTICULATE SPECTRA CONTAINING CHROMIUM, MANGANESE, AND IRON
                                2
         	Amounts (yig/cm )	    Relative standard deviations (%)
Element     Case 1             Case 2        Without Mn Library With Mn  Library
        (Good statistics) (Poor statistics)   Case 1     Case 2  Case 1Case  2
Chromium     13.7

Manganese      0.685

Iron          13.7
            0.274

            0.0274

            0.274
0.34       2.68    0.36     2.80

                   3.46    18.93

0.27       2.15    0.28     2.17
Reduced chi-square values:
                           3.20
           1.37
1.10
1.30

-------
   5.0
                                                            (A)
                                                                       5.0
u
z
<
I
u
 IRON  1.00
                                              T
                                                  T
- EXPERIMENTAL DATA
* LEAST-SQUARES FIT WITH
 MANGANESE  LIBRARY    —
 STANDARD MISSING
                                "1	T
                  «Mn Ko X-ray
   -5.01-
     80
         130    180     230     280    330    380     430     480
                        CHANNEL NUMBFR
                                                                     UJ
                                                                       4.0
X
U
cc
K
in
                                                                     z
                                                                     O
                                                                     <-> 2.0
                                                                     3.0
                                                                     fe
                                                                     8
                                              EXPERIMENTAL DATA
                                              LEAST-SQUARES FIT
                                               WITH ALL LIBRARY
                                                STANDARDS
      Figure  3.   Case 1.   Good  statistics.   X-ray  spectra
                   and residuals  for relative  amounts  of
                   backscatter, Cr, Mn,  and Fe in the  ratios
                   1.00, 1.00, 0.05, and 1.00  analyzed without
                   the Mn  library spectrum.
                                                                     1.0
                                                                     I o
                                                                     I 5.0
o
£t
Q 3.0
1
£ ro
fe
(/)
3-1.0
&
                                                                      :-3.0
<
3
9-5.0
J2    80     130     180     230    280    330    380    430     480
                        "	—  NIIMBFP
                                                                   Figure  4.  Case 1.   Good  statistics.   X-ray  spectra
                                                                               and residuals  for relative  amounts of
                                                                               backscatter, Cr,  Mn,  and Fe in the ratios
                                                                               1.00, 1.00, 0.05, and 1.00  analyzed with
                                                                               the Mn  Library included.
                                                                           ««•••»*        } ,*     ,  .
                                                                        *•*    **   .  *    *,..*••»   •  *. *  •."«•*'
                                                                        »•«»*•   »»>•»«** \   *»*   *»»*•»   •
                                                                        '**,£ V  *A   **^.«»"*T  »**«*" *«.«*  « *•***•»
                                                                        -  »-  •« *  »*»v *^« . •• •*  v   » *.^   ..,.-.
                                                                           *  »»*•  *.V •  ».** '*   *  *»•   *%****  *
                                                                          *     *         *^J"    ** *  *       *    «•
                                                                        •*..  v*    •.      ** *   %. .*•   . ••*
                                                                             +         .    *         4.*     * *
                                                                                J	I
                                                                                                  J	I	I       I

-------
        5.0
00
     UJ
     (£
     UJ
     0.
     z
     o
     o
     o
UJ
o
o
   •   *•**.   •  .  *•*, *
-...'v*V*'  •    \* •*'''•/..'.  '.•••'  . ./•*
     *              *        •            .
                  I
                         I
                                I
                                      I
                                             I
                                               I
     80     130    180    230    280    330     380    430    480

                         CHANNEL NUMBER
                                                                            5.0
                                                                                                         - EXPERIMENTAL DATA
                                                                                                         + LEAST- SQUARES FIT
                                                                                                            WITH ALL  LIBRARY
                                                                                                             STANDARDS
                                                                          05.0
                                                                          £ 3.0
                                                                          I
                                                                          en
                                                                            1.0
                                                                           :-3.o
                                                                          3
*         .*-.'..
X 5.  * **.*; ~*>v. . **   *-*•*
**  ;• .•*...« {.;   **>.**• ".jr.*.**".
                                                                  80     130     180    230    280     330

                                                                                     CHANNEL  NUMBER
                                                                                                                      380
                                                                                                                             "»30
    Figure  5.   Case 2.   Poor  statistics.   X-ray spectra
                and  residuals  for relative  amounts  of
                backscatter, Cr,  Mn, and Fe in the  ratios
                1.00, 0.02, 0.002, and  0.02 analyzed
                without  the Mn library  spectrum.
                                                              Figure 6.   Case 2.   Poor  statistics.   X-ray  spectra
                                                                           and residuals  for relative  amounts  of
                                                                           backscatter, Cr,  Mn,  and Fe in the  ratios
                                                                           1.00, 0.02, 0.002, and 0.02 analyzed with
                                                                           the Mn library included.

-------
     A problem that Is encountered  in  some  cases  in the  application  of  the
library least-squares method  is  that of  the pulse pile-up  phenomenon.   At
high counting rates two  (or more) pulses may be analyzed simultaneously giving
rise to sum pulses of the wrong  magnitude and  correspondingly  fewer  correct
individual pulses.  This phenomenon can  be  partially accounted for by the use
of electronic pile-up rejection  methods.  However,  it  is impossible  to
eliminate all sum pulses by this method  and, therefore,  a  mathematical  model
and correction technique has  been developed and demonstrated (10,12).   It is
found that the model and correction technique  work  quite well  and are parti-
cularly suited to use with detection systems that include  electronic pulse
pile-up rejectors.

     The model for pulse pile up (10-12) is based on assuming  that only two
pulses are analyzed simultaneously  and that the interval probability distribu-
tion applies.  To obtain explicit analytical expressions the pulses are as-
sumed to be either parabolic  in  shape  or to be capable of  approximation by a
low-order polynomial.  Results of model  predictions based  on the parabolic
shape and the polynomial approximated  pulses are  shown in  Figure 7.  It is
obvious that the model is capable of good accuracy  in  either case, but  the
polynomial approximated  pulses give significnatly better results.

     The previously mentioned problem  of obtaining  the shape of the  source
backscattered spectrum for the more general problem of homogeneous samples has
been studied by using Monte Carlo simulation (8,9).  Monte Carlo models were
developed that considered the five  cases:   (1) single  Rayleigh (coherent)
scattering, (2) single Compton (incoherent) scattering,  (3) double Compton
scattering, (4) Compton-Rayleigh scattering, and  (5) Rayleigh-Compton scatter-
ing.  A typical set of predicted results are shown  in  Figure 8 for the last
four cases.  The single  Rayleigh case  (and  multiple Rayleigh scattering) is
trivial since no change  in energy occurs and the  normal  Gaussian-shaped pulse
with the resolution imposed by the  detector is observed.   The  spectra from
these five cases were then used  as  librarXqSpectra  in  a  least-squares program
to fit the experimental  spectrum from  a     Cd  source.  The results of the
predicted least-squares  fit of the  individual  library  spectra  are compared to
experimental results in  Figure 9.   It  is clear that this technique is quite
accurate and should prove useful for homogeneous  samples of known thickness.

     Another problem in  the application  of  the library least-squares method is
the necessity for preparing samples and  obtaining the  response from all the
pure elements of interest to  the analyst to obtain  library spectra.  This is a
tedious and frustrating  procedure and  has the  disadvantages that:  (1)  a large
amount of experimental work is required, (2) a large amount of computer
storage is necessary, (3) inaccuracies arise due  to impurities in the samples
and the analyzer system, and  (4) any change in the  analyzer system (particu-
larly the detector) requires  that the  library  spectra  be accumulated again.
To alleviate this problem a model of pure element library  spectra has been
constructed based on first obtaining a model for  the Si(Li) detector response
function (13,14).  This  approach has been demonstrated for two Si(Li) detec-
tion systems of varying  complexity  and for  a range  of  elements from manganese
to arsenic for excitation with molybdenum K X  rays.  All of the disadvantages
previously listed are alleviated and,  in addition,  one has the advantage with
this method that ratios  of the K-a  and K-g  X rays need not be  fixed.  One

-------
                      IP        60
                      CHANNEL NUMBER
                                         80
                                                  100
                           60
                       CHANNEL NUMBER
Figure 7.    Comparison of an experimental high
             counting rate spectrum of 55Fe with
             that predicted by parabolic and
             polynomial approximated pulse shapes.
                       10

-------
          3.2x10
          1.0x10
              .-6
              .-8
          4x10'
        w  2x10"8
        I 24x10 9
        •o

        u
        c


        in
        c
        O      Q

              ~
o
L-
*


t

c
              .-8
        o 12x10
           6x10
                             19.5
                             19.5
                              nil
                            —r

                             19.5
                             19.5
                                          Single Complon
                                                 22.5
                                           Compton - Compton
                                                 22.5
Compton -Raylsigh
      22.5
                                           Rayteigh- Compton
      22.5

  Energy (keV )
Figure  8.     Monte  Carlo-predicted photon spectra  from  the

                Ag K-a X ray (22.163  keV)  scattered from a

                5  mm thick  Al target.
                                 11

-------
                                                  — Experiment
                                                  ++ LSQ fit using
                                                    Monte  Carlo shape standards
                          315
                                330
345
      360
                                                   375
390     «05
 Channel number
 Figure 9.   Comparison of the observed backscatter region of the X-ray
            spectrum from a    Cd source from a 5mm thick Al sample wit
            that predicted from Monte Carlo-generated shape standards.
 only has to have available a few standards containing known amounts of a
 mixture of elements to utilize the Si(Li) response function model for
 producing pure element standard libraries*

      The Si(Li) response function model for photons up to about 30 keV
 exhibits five major spectral features*  The lowest energy feature results  from
 Compton scattering within the detector.  In most cases this occurs at pulse-
 height energies lower than the lower level discriminator of the spectrometer
 and. therefore, has no practical importance.  The second feature is a flat
 continuum from the lowest energy up to the center of the main photopeak.   The
 third feature is a truncated exponential tail to the low-energy side of each
 photopeak.   The fourth feature is a Gaussian-shaped silicon X-ray escape peak.
 The  fifth and final feature is the main photopeak which is also Gaussian-
 Shaped.   The last four of these features are illustrated for the two K-ex
 X rays of gallium in Figure 10.

      The  four parameters required in the response function were obtained for
 13 pure element spectra for a double guard-ring Si(Li) detector system.  The
experimental  and model pulse-height spectra for four representative elements
are  shown  in  Figures 11 through 14.  This data had to be manipulated some-
what  since  contaminants were present in almost all of the original spectra.
In many cases unwanted photopeaks were stripped from the original data.  As a
result of this some of the  model spectra do not correspond to experimental
results as  well  as  others.   Of the four spectra given two are representative

                                      12

-------
                                                ..
                      OftLLIUM
     
-------
   o
   o
        10'
                    MflNGRNESE
        10'
        10'
10'
        10*
              I
           80        131        182

                    CHflNNEL NUMBER
                                233
 335
 386
Figure  11.   The  response function model compared  to the experimental

             pulse-height spectrum for manganese.
                   NICKEL
  v>
  o
  o
       10
                   131       182

                   CHflNNEL NUMBER
                               233
335
386
Figure 12.  The  response function model  compared to the experimental

            pulse-height spectrum with nickel.
                                       14

-------
                     GflLLIUM
    o
    o
                      131       182
                      CHflNNEL NUMBER
                              233
28*
335
386
 Figure 13.   The response  function model compared to the experimental
             pulse-height  spectrum for gallium.
                     flRSENIC
    I
80
                      131        182
                     CHflNNEL NUMBER
                             233
                                                             335
                   386
Figure 14.  The  response function model compared  to  the  experimental
            pulse-height spectrum for arsenic.
                                      15

-------
                                  SECTION 5

                     DETERMINATION OF ELEMENTAL AMOUNTS

     For the determination of elemental amounts from characteristic X-ray
intensities a Monte Carlo simulation for various sample matrices has been
developed (6,7).  Results were obtained for participates deposited on filters
excited by photons.  Idealized particle shapes such as spheres and right
circular cylinders of various lengths were considered.  Empirical correction
factors for typical cases of practical interest were reported.  Secondary
fluorescence effects were included in the simulation.  This appears to be a
useful approach for correcting for sample matrix effects when characteristics
of the particulates in the sample are fairly well known.

     An example result is shown in Figure 15 for the case of sulfur enhance-
ment by calcium in the form of either CaO, CaCO_, or CaSO,.2(H20) as calcula-
ted for the idealized cases of uniform spheres or uniform layers.  In the
case of the CaO and the CaCO  the sulfur is assumed to be in trace quantities
that are uniformly distributed.  It is obvious that a significant amount of
enhancement occurs in these practical cases of interest and that it must be
taken into account if good accuracy is to be obtained.

     In addition to this application of primary interest other cases of
practical interest have also been treated by Monte Carlo simulation.  These
include:  monoenergetic wide-angle photon excitation of homogeneous
samples (15,16), monoenergetic and continuous narrow-beam photon excitation of
homogeneous samples (17), and monoenergetic, secondary-fluorescer photon
excitation of homogeneous samples (18).  Recently a simple model based on
Monte Carlo simulated results has been developed for particulate powder
samples (19).

     The fundamental parameters method consists of using the fundamental
parameters of X-ray fluorescence such as photoelectric cross-sections and
fluorescence yields in rigorous mathematical relationships for predicting the
characteristic X-ray intensities from the elemental amounts in samples.  These
rigorous mathematical relationships can only be obtained in explicit analyti-
cal form for the simple case of a thick homogeneous sample with a constant
angle of entrance of the monoenergetic photon exciting source radiation and a
constant angle of exit of the characteristic X rays.  However, one may obtain
primary, secondary, and tertiary fluorescence in these rigorous relationships
for this specific case.  Primary, secondary, and tertiary fluorescence are
defined as the characteristic X rays produced from the element of interest,
either directly from the exciting radiation (primary), indirectly through the
characteristic X rays from a second element (secondary) or indirectly through
the characteristic X rays from a third element, which in turn was produced by
the characteristic X rays of a second element (tertiary).

                                     16

-------
                 X
                 I—
                 O
                 LU
                 LU
                 O
            LU
            x
                 UJ
                 z
                 It
                  I
                 x
                  a
I
w
u_
o
g
cc
                     1.0
                    1.5
                         5       10      15     20
                           SPHERE DIAMETER (urn)
                 t   1.4
                    1.3
                     1.2
                    '0
                        a - CoO
                        a - CoCO.
                              5      10      15
                                LAYER THICKNESS (j/m)
                                             20
Figure 15.  Variation of sulfur enhancement  with layer thickness and sphere
            diameter for various calcium  compounds.   For CaO and CaCO  It is
            assumed that sulfur as a  trace element is uniformly dispersed
            throughout the sphere or  layer.
In a series of
                            Gardner and  Hawthorne (15-18) have extended the
of infinite  thickness ^J * '^^f^^ that symmetry exists  about  the
cular problem is fortunately  two  a            circular detector.   This  makes
                                       17

-------
It is possible in treating this problem to accomplish complete variance reduction
on the basis of physical principles.  This means that the resulting computer
program designed to make the Monte Carlo calculations is as efficient as possible
and that this is attained without the fear of introducing bias.  Typical calculation
times for the computer program on an IBM 360/165 computer are 15 seconds to
obtain relative standard deviations of 2% or better for three components in
one sample when primary, secondary and tertiary fluorescence are considered.
The FORTRAN statements for the computer program XRAY designed to accomplish
this calculation are available from the authors.

     The Monte Carlo simulation was verified by making calculations for an
extreme analyzer geometry, which was chosen to approximate the conditions of
fixed angle of exciting source entry and fixed angle of characteristic X-ray
exit so that the explicit analytical solution derived by Sherman (20,21) is
also valid.  A comparison of the results obtained by the two methods is given
in Table 3.  Note that there is no statistical difference between the Monte
Carlo results and those from the analytical relationships.  Note also that
verification of the Monte Carlo simulation with the explicit analytical solution
has the advantage over the use of experimental results in that while only the
total intensities could be checked by experiment, the explicit analytical solutions
provide verification of the primary, secondary and tertiary fluorescence contributions
as well.

     Reference 17 described the adaptation of this Monte Carlo simulation to
the continuous and discrete exciting source photon spectra from conventional
X-ray tubes.  This is accomplished by obtaining a probability distribution of
the X-ray tube exciting source spectrum and sampling from the cumulative dis-
tribution constructed from it to begin each Monte Carlo history.  The Monte
Carlo simulation was verified in this case with the results given by Shiraiwa
and Fujino (22,23).  They used the analytical relationships for primary, secondary
and tertiary fluorescence in homogeneous thick samples for the fixed entrance
and exit angles and discrete photon spectra with numerical integration to obtain
results for a continuous spectra of exciting photons as would be obtained with
a conventional X-ray tube.  By using the identical fundamental parameters and
form of the X-ray tube spectrum that they used in the Monte Carlo simulation
the results are directly comparable.  These results are given in Table 4.  Note
that the average relative error for all results was only 0.95%, while the average
Monte Carlo predicted relative standard deviation was 1.47%.  This indicates
that the Monte Carlo simulation is well within the experimental accuracy attain-
able with XRF analyses.  The computer times required for these calculations were
about 45 seconds per case.

     Reference 18 describes the extension of the Monte Carlo method to secondary
fluorescer X-ray machines.  This was accomplished by assuming that a distribu-
tion of X-ray intensities from all positions on the secondary fluorescer could
be obtained.  A simple experimental method for accomplishing this was developed
and demonstrated.  It consisted of placing a small piece of the fluorescer of
interest at known locations on the target and measuring the resulting intensity
with a detector located at a fixed distance above the target.  The general
secondary fluorescer geometry assumed is shown in Figure*16.,
                                     18

-------
TABLE 3.  COMPARISON OF INTENSITIES PREDICTED BY THE MONTE  CARLO  SIMULATION AND THE EXPLICIT ANALYTICAL
          RELATIONSHIPS

Component
Primary Ni
Primary Fe
Primary Cr
Secondary Ni-Fe
Secondary Ni-Cr
Secondary Fe-Cr
Tertiary Ni-Fe-Cr

Intensity
0.086829
0.33410
0.19167
0.023921
0.014772
0.062348
0.0052
Sam pi e 1
Error in
Monte Carlo
prediction
(%)
+2.27
+0.03
-1.91
+0.75
-1.16
-0.08
-1.92

Monte Carlo
predicted
standard
deviation
«)
2.37
1. 87
1.65
1.91
1.68
1.79
1.95

Intensity
0.59657
0.042168
0.096741
0.022259
0. 052694
0.0039275
0.0026
Sample 2
Error in
Monte Carlo
prediction
(%)
-0.31
-0. 64
-1.80
-0.71
-1.70
+1.84
-7. 69

Monte Carlo
predicted
standard
deviation
a)
1.47
1,66
1.70
1.96
1.98
1.92
2.49

-------
         TABLE  4.    COMPARISON  OF  RELATIVE  INTENSITIES3  FOR  MONTE  CARLO AND NUMERICAL  CALCULATIONS



        Composition     HI  X-rays                       Fe X-rays                                                     Cr X-rays
        <%>

        XI  Fe  Cr      Primary         Primary         Secondary       Total           Primary        Secondary-Nl    Secondary-Fe    Tertiary        Total


        15  70  15
        (Monte Carlo)    0.0651(2.04%)  0.5277(1.34%)   0.0220(1.51%)  0.5497(1.28%)  0.1525(1.57%)  0.0042(1.40%)  0.0473(1.43%)  0.0023(1.60%)  0.2063(1.19%)
        (::u.-erieaa)c    0.064           0.532           0.022           0.558           0.155          0.004           0.047          0.0021          0.2C3

        15  35  50
        (Monte Carlo)    0.0694 (2.04%)  0.1753 (1.74%)   0.0068 (1.98%)  0.1821  (1.67%)  0.4788 (1.18%)  0.0164 (1.39%)  0.0527  (1.28%)  0.0027 (1.48%)  0.5'3r>5 (l.C3%)
        (Xa-aerical)     O.C6S           0.175           0.007           0.182           0.489          0.016           0.052          0.0025          0.559

        20  55  25
        Olor.ta Carlo)    0.0914 (1.99%)  0.3614 (1.47%)   0.0201 (1.66%)  0.3815  (1.39%)  0.2458 (1.41%)  0.0101 (1.41%)  0.0530  (1.38%)  0.0036 (1.56%)  0.3124 (1.122)
        (Numerical)     0.090           0.363           0.020           0.383           0.250          0.010           0.052          0.0033          0.315
fo
°      25  65  10
        (Monte Carlo)    0.1152 (1.94%)  0.5279 (1.30%)   0.0396 (1.46%)  0.5675  (1.21%)  0.1018 (1.69%)  0.0048 (1.42%)  0.0312  (1.49%)  0.0027 (1.65%)  C. 14C4 (1.25;;)
        (N-Jserical)     0.114           0.533           0.040           0.573           0.103          0.005.          0.031          0.0025          0.141

        25  25  50
        (Monte Carlo}    0.1246 (1.94%)  0.1253 (1.77%)   0.0086 (2.00%)  0.1339  (1.65%)  0.4733 (1.19%)  0.0288 (1.41%)  0.0369  (1.31%)  0.0033 (1.50%)  0.5422 (1.04%)
        (Xuserical)     0.123           0.125           0.009           0.134           0.483          0.029           0.037          0.0031          0.552

        40  50  10
        (Monte Carlo)    0.2064 (1.80%)  0.4061 (1.35%)   0.0539 (1.48%)  0.4600  (1.20%)  0.0097 (1.69%)  0.0085 (1.45%)  0.0035  (1.54%)  0.0035 (1.69%)  0.1350 (1.26%)
                        0.205           0.410           0.053           0.463           0.101          0.009           0.023          0.0033          0.135
                                                               |i
        40  30  30
        (Mante Carlo)    0.2155(1.80%)  0.1859(1.60%)   0.0234(1.77%)  0.2093(1.42%)  0.2853(1.37%)  0.0278(1.45%)  0.0316(1.43%)  0.0048(1.59%)  0.3495(1.11%)
        (Nuaerlcal)     0.213           0.187           0.024           0.210           0.290          0.028           0.031          0.0046          0.354

        70  20  10
        (Monte Carlo)    0.4766 (1.53%)  0.1659 (1.57%)   0.0497 (1.59%)  0.2156  (1.25%)  0.0972 (1.73%)  0.0191 (1.58%)  0.0091  (1.78%)  0.0031 (1.82%)  0.1235 (1.31%)
        (Munerlcal)     0.478           0.167           0.043-           0.210           0.098          0.019           0.009          0.0029          0.129

        80  1C  10
        (Xonte Carlo)    0.6116 (1.43%)  0.0842 (1.72%)   0.0324 (1.66%)  0.1166  (1.31%)  0.0969 (1.77%)  0.0246 (1.66%)  0.0046  (1.98%)  0.0019 (1.90%)  0.1280 (1.36X)
        (Xunerical)     0.615           0.085           0.033           0.118           0.097          0.025           0.005          0.0019          0.128

        aAverage predicted relative standard deviation for all the total Intensities » 1.47%.  Average most probable relative error  for
        .all the total Intensities • 0.95%.
         Predicted relative standard deviations given in parentheses.
        c:."ucerical results taken fron Ref.  [6].

-------
                                                     RECTANGULAR
                                                     SECONDARY SOURCE
                                                     —TARGET
                             (0.0,0)
 Figure 16.  Schematic  diagram of the arrangement and nomenclative of the
             rectangular secondary source  target and circular sample in
             relation  to the circular detector  and collimator for the
             Monte  Carlo simulation of a secondary fluorescer EDXRF system.
      A typical experimental secondary source  intensity distribution is shown
in  Figure 17.  Typical  Monte Carlo results as compared to experimental data
are shown in Figures  18,  19, and 20.  It is clear from these results that
the method is quite accurate.
            -0             5             10            '5            03
                DISTANCE ALONG THE SECONDARY FLUORESCER TARGET FROM  ONE END (mm)


Figure  17.   A typical experimental secondary source  intensity distribution.


                                       21

-------
               1.3 T-
NJ
                04
                                         o CALCULATION MONTE CARLO

                                         I EXPERIMENTAL
                                       O PURE Ni  MONTE CARLO
                                       a PURE Fe  MONTE CARLO
                                       6 PURE Cr  MONTE CARLO
                                        EXPERIMENTAL Ni
                                                                            04
                       ,0.    20°    30°    40'   50°    60°    70°
                       ANGLE OF SAMPLE WITH HORIZONTAL PLANE, e, (degrees)
                   10°    20°    30°    40°    50°   60°    70°
                  ANGLE OF SAMPLE WITH HORIZONTAL PLANE ,es,(degrees)
     Figure 18.  Monte Carlo simulation and  experimental
                  results  for the relative  intensities
                  from a pure nickel  sample at various
                  angles for the Case l(a)  and Case  2(b)
                  system parameters given in  Table  I.
Figure  19.  Monte Carlo  simulation and  experi-
             mental results for  the relative in-
             tensities from pure nickel,  pure
             iron, and pure chromium samples at
             various angles for  the Case  3 system
              parameters  given in Table  I.

-------
                     t.s-r
                     1.2 -
                                              O Ni 42 % MONTE CARLO
                                              D Ft 58 % MONTE CARLO
                                              • EXPERIMENTAL NI
                                              • EXPERIMENTAL Fe
   Kf    30°    30°    40*   50°    60°
WWLE Of SAMPLE WITH HORIZONTAL PL ANE , 6S ,
                                                          70°
 Figure 20.   Monte Carlo simulation and  experimental  results for the
             relative intensities  from a 42 percent nickel  - 58 per-
             cent iron binary  sample at  various angles for  the Case
             3 system parameters given in Table 1.
      The primary anticipated use  of  the  Monte Carlo simulation is in the
 calibration of EDXRF analyzer  systems.   Although the calibration could  be
 performed in a number of ways, the primary use of the Monte Carlo simulation
 would almost always be in providing  "bench mark" responses for samples  of
 known composition and other pertinent properties.  If one adopts the usual
 experimental technique of obtaining  responses as the response  from the  sample
 of  interest divided by the response  from a pure sample of the  appropriate
 element,  then Monte Carlo simulations could be used to provide accurate
 "synthetic" standards of this  type.  -These could be used  instead of actual
 standards with experimental responses for preparing empirical  calibration
 relationships.  The advantages of this procedure include:  (1) being able  to
 obtain better accuracy since alternate elemental analyses are  not required,
 (2) eliminating the expense and time-consuming process of preparing actual
 standards and obtaining experimental responses, and (3) being  able to select
 the range of standard compositions and other properties pertinent to the
 analyses  to be performed without  physical  limitations.

      Another second order use of  the Monte Carlo simulation is in the optimum
geometrical  design of secondary fluorescer EDXRF analyzer systems.   In  order to
use the Monte Carlo simulation in this way it is desirable to  modify it to
include the  scatter of the exciting  radiation (Compton and Rayleigh) so that
                                      23

-------
one will be able to evaluate what is usually taken as either the signal-to-
noise or signal-to-background ratios.  This modification should be relatively
easy to make in principle, but in practice some of the pertinent interaction
cross sections may be inaccurate or unavailable.

     This brings up the additional point of interest to the authors which is
to provide predictions of complete spectral responses from EDXRF analyzer
systems so that more of the available information can be used for analysis
purposes.  While it is true that much more elemental analysis information is
contained in the characteristic X-ray responses than in the scattered response,
nevertheless additional useful information is available from this latter
source.  The approach of utilizing all of the available spectral information
is presently being investigated.

     While the present Monte Carlo simulations are very efficient since essen-
tially complete variance reduction techniques have been employed, the calcula-
tions are still quite time consuming and expensive.  Therefore, the Monte Carlo
simulation will probably not often be used in routine calculation such as in
the small computers association with EDXRF analyzer systems or even in off-line
computations on large computers for individual sample data processing.  There
is a need for the development of simple approximate models to replace the Monte
Carlo simulation for routine use.  It appears that one very promising approach
is to use either the average angle approach (6,7) directly or a suitable modi-
fication of it.  This approach essentially consists of obtaining the average
entrance and exit angles for a given EDXRF analyzer system by Monte Carlo
simulation.  Then with these average angles one may use either the explicit
analytical equations originally derived by Sherman (20,21) for thick homogen-
eous samples or a suitable equation like that derived by Dzubay and Nelson (24)
for other types of samples to simulate sample responses.  One modification of
this would be to use two or more different radiation paths at fixed entrance
and exit angles within the range of these angles that exist in the EDXRF
analyzer system.  This approximation is presently under study.
                                     24

-------
                                  REFERENCES

1.   Salmon, L.   Analysis of Gamma-Ray Scintillation  Spectra by the Method of
     Least-Squares.   Nuclear Instruments and Methods,  14:193-198,  1961.

2.   Schonfeld,  E.,  A.  H. Kibbey, and W. Davis, Jr.   Determination of Nuclide
     Concentrations  in Solutions Containing Low Levels of Radioactivity by
     Least-Squares  Resolution of the Gamma-Ray Spectra*  Nuclear Instruments
     and Methods,  45:1-21, 1966.

3.   Trombka,  J.  I., and R. L. Schmadebeck.  A Numerical Least-Square Method
     for Resolving  Complex Pulse-Height Spectra.  NASA SP-3044, National
     Aeronautics and Space Administration, Gbddard Space Center, Washington,
     D. C.,  1968.  170 pp.

4.   Arinc,  F*,  R.  P. Gardner, L. Wielopolski, and A. R. Stiles.  Application
     of the  Least-Squares Method to the Analysis of XRF Spectral Intensities
     from Atmospheric Participates Collected on Filters.  Advances in X-Ray
     Analysis,  19:367-380, 1976.

5.   Arinc,  F.,  L. Wielopolski, and R.  P.  Gardner.  The Linear Least-Squares
     Analysis  of X-Ray Fluorescence Spectra of Aerosol Samples Using Pure
     Element Library Standards and Photon Excitation.  In:  X-Ray Fluorescence
     Analysis  of Environmental Samples, T.  G.  Dzubay, ed.  Ann Arbor Science
     Publishers,  Inc.,  Ann Arbor, Michigan, 1977.   pp. 227-240.

6.   Hawthofne,  A.  R.,  R. P*  Gardner, and T.  G.  Dzubay.  Monte Carlo Simulation
     of Self-Absorption Effects in Elemental  XRF Analysis of Atmospheric
     Participates Collected on Filters.  Advances  in X-Ray Analysis,  19:323-337,
     1976.

7.   Hawthorne,  A.  R.,  and R.  P. Gardner.   Monte Carlo Applications to the
     X-Ray Fluorescence Analysis of Aerosol Samples.   In:  X-Ray Fluorescence
     Analysis  of  Environmental Samples, T.  G.  Dzubay, ed.  Ann Arbor Science
     Publishers,  Inc.,  Ann Arbor, Michigan, 1977.   pp. 209-220.
                               N
8.   Arinc, S. Faruk.  Mathematical Methods for Energy Dispersive X-Ray
     Fluorescence Analysis.   Ph.D.  Thesis,  North Carolina State University,
     Raleigh, North  Carolina,  1976.   164 pp.

9.   Arinc  F., and  R.  P. Gardner.   Models  for Correcting Backscatter Non-
     linearities  in  XRF Pulse-Height Spectra.   Transactions  of  the  American
     Nuclear Society, Supplement No. 3,  21:37-38,  1975.

10.   Wielopolski, Lucian, and  Robin P.  Gardner.  Prediction  of  the  Pulse-
     Height Spectral  Distortion Caused  by the  Peak Pile-Up Effect.   Nuclear

                                      25

-------
     Instruments and Methods,  133:303-309,  1976.

11.  Gardner, Robin P., and Lucian Wielopolski.   A Generalized Method for
     Correcting Pulse-Height Spectra  for  the  Peak Pile-Up Effect Due to
     Double Sum Pulses.   Part  I.  Predicting  Spectral  Distortion for Arbitrary
     Pulse Shapes.  Nuclear Instruments and Methods,  140:289-296, 1977.

12.  Wielopolski, Lucian, and  Robin P. Gardner.   A Generalized Method for
     Correcting Pulse-Height Spectra  for  the  Peak Pile-Up Effect Due to
     Double Sum Pulses.   Part  II.  The Inverse  Calculation for Obtaining
     True from Observed Spectra.  Nuclear Instruments  and Methods,  140:297-
     303, 1977.

13.  Wielopolski, L., and R. P.  Gardner*   Development  of the Detector Response
     Function Approach for the Library Least-Squares Analysis of Energy-
     Dispersive X-Ray Fluorescence Spectra.   Advances  in X-Ray Analysis,
     22:317-323, 1979.

14.  Wielopolski, L., and R. P.  Gardner,   Development  of the Detector Response
     Function Approach in the  Least-Squares Analysis of X-Ray Fluorescence
     Spectra.  Nuclear Instruments and Methods,  165:297-306, 1979.

15.  Gardner, Robin  P., and Alan R. Hawthorne.  Monte  Carlo Simulation of the
     X-Ray Fluorescence Excited by Discrete Energy Photons in Homogeneous
     Samples  Including Tertiary Inter-Element Effects.   X-Ray Spectrometry,
     4:138-148,  1975.

 16.  Hawthorne, Alan  R.,  and Robin P. Gardner.  Fundamental Parameters
     Solution to  the  X-Ray Fluorescence Analysis  of Nickel-Iron-Chromium
     Alloys  Including Tertiary Corrections.   Analytical Chemistry,  48:2130-
     2135, 1976.

17.  Hawthorne, Alan  R. ,  and Robin P. Gardner.  Monte  Carlo Simulation of
     X-Ray Fluorescence from Homogeneous  Multielement  Samples Excited by
     Continuous and  Discrete Energy Photons from  X-Ray Tubes.  Analytical
     Chemistry, 47:2220-2225,  1975.

18.  Gardner, R.  P.,  L. Wielopolski,  and  J. M.  Doster.   Adaptation of the
     Fundamental  Parameters Monte Carlo  Simulation to  EDXRF Analysis with
     Secondary Fluorescer X-Ray Machines. Advances in X-Ray Analysis,
     21:129-142,, 1978.

19.  Hawthorne, Alan  R.,  and Robin P. Gardner.  A Proposed Model for
     Particle-Size Effects in  the X-Ray  Fluorescence Analysis of Heterogeneous
     Powders that  Includes Incidence  Angle and  Non-Random Packing Effects.
     X-Ray Spectrometry,  7(4):198-205, 1978.

20.  Sherman, J.  The Theoretical Derivation  of Fluorescent X-ray Intensities
     from Mixtures.   Spectrochimica Acta, 7:283-306,  1955.

21.  Sherman, J.  Simplication of a Formula in  the Correlation of Fluorescent
     X-ray Intensities from Mixtures.   Spectrochimica  Acta,  15:466-470,  1959.

                                      26

-------
22.  Shiraiwa, T., and  N.  Fujino.  Theoretical Calculation of Fluorescent
     X-ray Intensities  in Fluorescent X-ray Spectrochemical Analysis.
     Japanese Journal of  Applied Physics, 5(10), 886-899, 1966.

23.  Shiraiwa, T., and  N.  Fujino.  Theoretical Calculation of Fluorescent
     X-ray Intensities  of Nickel-Iron-Chromium Ternary Alloys.  Bulletin of
     the Chemical  Society of Japan, 40:2289-2296, 1967.

24.  Dzubay, T.  G.,  and R. 0. Nelson.  Self Absorption Corrections for X-Say
     Fluorescence Analysis of Aerosols.  Advances in X-Ray Analysis, 18:619-631,
     1974.
                                       27

-------
                                  APPENDIX

              List of Reports, Theses, and  Publications  Either
                Entirely or Partially Supported  by  this  Grant

                                   Reports

Gardner, R. P., F. Arinc, E.  Efird, L. Wielopolski,  A. R.  Hawthorne,  and
K. Verghese.  Mathematical Techniques for X-Ray  Analyzers,  Technical  Progress
Report, U.S.E.P.A. Grant No.  R-802759, for  period May 15,  1974,  to  May 14,
1975.

Gardner, R. P., F. Arinc, A.  R. Hawthorne,  L. Wielopolski,  G. R.  Beam, and
K. Verghese.  Mathematical Techniques for X-Ray  Analyzers,  Technical  Progress
Report, U.S.E.P.A. Grant No.  R-802759, for  period May 15,  1975,  to  May 14,
1976.

                                   Theses

Arinc, S.  Faruk.  Mathematical Methods for  Energy Dispersive X-Ray  Fluores-
cence Analysis.   Ph.D.  Thesis, North Carolina State  University,  Raleigh,
North Carolina, 1976.   164 pp.

Beam, George R.   Gamma-Ray Transport and X-Ray Fluorescence Calculations by
Invariant  Imbedding.  M.S. Thesis, North Carolina State  University, Raleigh,
North Carolina, 1977.   136 pp.

Hawthorne, Alan R.  Mathematical Models for Interelement and Matrix Effects
in X-Ray Fluorescence Analysis.  Ph.D. Thesis, North Carolina State
University, Raleigh, North Carolina, 1977.   185  pp.

Wielopolski, Lucian.  Utilization of Si(Li) Detector Response Function and
Pile-Up Model in  the Analysis of X-Ray Spectra.  Ph.D. Thesis,  North  Carolina
State University, Raleigh, North Carolina,  1979.  85 pp.

                              Journal Articles

Arinc, F., and R. P. Gardner.  Models for Correcting Backscatter Nonlinear-
ities in XRF Pulse-Height Spectra.  Transactions of  the  American Nuclear
Society, Supplement No. 3, 21:37-38, 1975.

Arinc, F., R. P.  Gardner, L.  Wielopolski, and A. R.  Stiles. Application of
the Least-Squares Method to the Analysis of XRF  Spectral Intensities  from
Atmospheric Particulates Collected on Filters.   Advances in X-Ray Analysis,
19:367-380, 1976.


                                       28

-------
Arinc, F.  L. Wielopolski, and R. P. Gardner.  The Linear Least-Squares
Analysis of X-Ray  Fluorescence Spectra of Aerosol Samples Using Pure Element
Library Stanrdards and Photon Excitation.  In:  X-Ray Fluorescence Analysis of
Environmental Samples  T.  G. Dzubay, ed.  Ann Arbor Science Publishers, Inc.,
Ann Arbor, Michigan,  1977.  pp. 227-240.

Gardner. Robin  P., and Alan R. Hawthorne.  Monte Carlo Simulation of the
X-Ray Fluorescence Excited by Discrete Energy Photons in Homogeneous Samples
Including Tertiary Inter-Element Effects.  X-Ray Spectrometry, 4:138-148,
1975.

Gardner, R. P., L. Wielopolski, and K. Verghese.  Application of,Selected
Mathematical  Techniques to Energy-Dispersive X-Ray Fluorescence Analysis.
Atomic Energy Review, 15(4):701-754, 1977.

Gardner, R. P., L. Wielopolski, and J. M. Doster.  Adaptation of the Funda-
mental Parameters  Monte Carlo Simulation to EDXRF Analysis with Secondary
Fluorescer  X-Ray Machines.  Advances in X-Ray Analysis, 21:129-142, 1978.

Gardner, R. P., L. Wielopolski, and K. Verghese.  Mathematical Techniques
for  Quantitative Elemental Analysis by Energy Dispersive X-Ray Fluorescence.
Journal  of  Radioanalytical Chemistry, 43:611-643, 1978.

Gardner, R. P., and J. M.  Doster.  The Reduction of Matrix Effects in X-Ray
Fluorescence  Analysis by the Monte Carlo, Fundamental Parameters Method.
Advances in X-Ray  Analysis, 22:343-356, 1979.

Hawthorne,  Alan R., and Robin P. Gardner.  Monte Carlo Models for the Inverse
Calculation of  Multielement Amounts in XRF Analysis.  Transactions of the
American Nuclear Society,  Supplement No. 3, 21:38-39, 1975.

Hawthorne,  Alan R., and Robin P. Gardner.  Monte Carloa Simulation of X-Ray
Fluorescence  from  Homogeneous Multielement Samples Excited by Continuous
and  Discrete  Energy Photons from X-Ray Tubes.  Analytical Chemistry,
47:2220-2225, 1975.

Hawthorne,  A. R.,  R.  P. Gardner, and T. G. Dzubay.  Monte Carlo Simulation of
Self-Absorption Effects in Elemental XRF Analysis of Atmospheric Particulates
Collected on  Filters.  Advances in X-Ray Analysis, 19:323-337, 1976.

Hawthorne,  Alan R., and Robin P. Gardner.  Fundamental Parameters  Solution
to the X-Ray  Fluorescence  Analysis of Nickel-Iron-Chromium Alloys  Including
Tertiary Corrections.  Analytical Chemistry, 48:2130-2135,  1976.

Hawthorne,  A. R.,  and R. P. Gardner.  Monte Carlo Applications to  the X-Ray
Fluorescence  Analysis of Aerosol Samples.  In:  X-Ray Fluorescence Analysis
of Environmental Samples,  T. G. Dzubay, ed.  Ann Arbor Science Publishers,
Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan, 1977.  pp. 209-220.

Hawthorne,  Alan R., and Robin P. Gardner.  A Proposed Model for Particle-
Size Effectsin the X-Ray  Fluorescence Analysis of Heterogeneous Powders that
Includef Incidence A^le'and Non-Random Racking Effects.   X-Ray Spectrometry,


                                       29

-------
7(4):198-205, 1978.

Wielopolski, Lucian, and Robin P. Gardner.  A  Simple  Accurate  Model  for
Correcting XRF Pulse-Height Spectra for Pulse  Pileup.   Transactions  of the
American Nuclear Society, Supplement No.  3, 21:  39-41,  1975.

Wielopolski, Lucian, and Robin P. Gardner.  Prediction  of  the  Pulse-Height
Spectral Distortion Caused by the Peak Pile-Up Effect.   Nuclear Instruments
and Methods, 133:303-309, 1976.

Wielopolski, Lucian, and Robin P. Gardner.  A  Generalized  Method  for Correct-
ing Pulse-Height Spectra for the Peak Pile-Up  Effect  Due to Double  Sum Pulses.
Part II.  The Inverse Calculation for Obtaining  True  from  Observed  Spectra.
Nuclear Instruments and Methods, 140:297-303,  1977.

Wielopolski, L., and R. P. Gardner*  Development of the Detector  Response
Function Approach for the Library Least-Squares  Analysis of Energy-Dispersive
X-Ray Fluorescence Spectra.  Advances in  X-Ray Analysis, 22:317-323,  1979.

Wielopolski, L., and R. P. Gardner.  Development of the Detector  Response
Function Approach in the Least-Squares Analysis  of X-Ray Fluorescence Spectra.
Nuclear Instruments and Methods, 165:297-306,  1979.
                                      30

-------
                                  TECHNICAL REPORT DATA
                           (Please read Instructions on the reverse before completing)
 REPORT NO.
   EPA-600/2-80-070
                                                            RECIPIENT'S ACCESSION-NO.
 TITLE AND SUBTITLE
   MATHEMATICAL TECHNIQUES FOR X-RAY ANALYZERS
              REPORT DATE
                April  1980
                                                            PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE
 AUTHOR(S)                 ~~~  ~  '        ~
   Robin P. Gardner and Kuruvilla Verghese
              PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NO.
. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS
   Center for Engineering Applications of Radioisotopes
   North Carolina State University
   Raleigh, N.C.  27650
                                                           0. PROGRAM ELEMENT NO.
                                                              1AD712B BB-041 FY-79
             1. CONTRACT/GRANT NO.
                                                              R-802759
12. SPONSORING AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS
   Environmental Sciences Research Laboratory — RTF, NC
   Office of Research and Development
   U.S. Environmental Protection  Agency
   Research Triangle Park, N.C. 27711
            13. TYPE OF REPORT AND PERIOD COVERED
                Final. S-7A — S-7Q	
            14. SPONSORING AGENCY CODE
                EPA/600/09
15. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES
        Mathematical techniques  and subsequent computer software were developed  to
   process energy-dispersive x-ray fluorescence spectra for elemental analysis of
   airborne particulate matter collected on filters.
        The research concerned two areas: (1) determination of characteristic x-ray
   intensities  and (2) determination of elemental amounts from the known  characteristic
   x-ray intensities.  In the first area, efforts  primarily concentrated on developing
   and implementating of the library, linear least-squares method and included the two
   common non-linear aspects of  XRF pulse-height spectra:  excitation source background
   and pulse  pile up.  A detector  response function model was also developed for Si(Li)
   detectors  to alleviate the necessity for obtaining and storing extensive complete
   library spectra for every element of interest.  This approach gives  improved  accurac
   greatly reduces the experimental effort required, and is capable of  accounting  for
   variations in detector calibration and resolution without requiring  extensive
   additional experimental effort.
        In the  second research area the fundamental parameters method was developed by
   by Monte Carol simulation.  Data were collected for several shapes of  particles
   deposited  on filters. Empirical correction factors for various practical cases  of
   interest based on these simulations are reported.

                               ^^^^^^^^^^•^^•^^^••^^••"•""•"^^^^•••^^^^^^"ffBfflW^W""1""
                                KEY WORDS AND DOCUMENT ANALYSIS
                  DESCRIPTORS
                                              b.lDENTIFIERS/OPEN ENDED TERMS.
                                                                           COS/
    Air pollution
   *Particles
   *x-ray fluorescence
   *Chemical elements
   *Applications  of mathematics
   *Compter systems programs
113. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT

   RELEASE TO PUBLIC
   'HI
   •••MM
EPA Form 2220-1 (9-73)
19. SECURITY CLASS (ThisReport)
    UNCLASSIFIED
                               13B
                               20F
                               07B
                               12A
                               09A
21. NO. OF PAGES
     41
20. SECURITY CLASS (Thispage)

    UNC
                          22. PRICE
                                             31

-------