FINAL DRAFT
               United Stales                                 FCAO-CIN fiflfi*

               SET""1"
                      ' '   ^^H^^__
&EPA       Research  and

               Development
             HEALTH AND  ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS DOCUMENT
             FOR 2-CHLOROPHENOL
              Prepared  for
             OFFICE OF SOLID WASTE AND
             EMERGENCY RESPONSE
              Prepared by
              Environmental Criteria and Assessment Office
              Office of Health and Environmental Assessment
              U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
              Cincinnati,  OH  45268
                         DRAFT: 00 NOT CITE OR QUOTE
                                NOTICE
              document 1s a preliminary draft.  It has not been formally released
              S. Environmental Protection Agency and should  not at this stage be
               to represent Agency policy.  It 1s being  circulated for comments
              chnlcal accuracy and policy implications.

-------
                                  DISCLAIMER

    This report  Is  an external  draft  for review purposes only  and  does not
constitute  Agency  policy.   Mention of  trade  names  or  commercial  products
does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use.
                                       11

-------
                                    PREFACE


    Health and  Environmental  Effects  Documents (HEEOs) are prepared  for  the
Office of  Solid  Waste  and Emergency Response  (OSWER).  This  document  series
Is Intended to support  listings  under  the  Resource  Conservation  and  Recovery
Act  (RCRA) as  well as  to provide health-related limits and  goals for  emer-
gency  and  remedial actions  under  the Comprehensive  Environmental  Response,
Compensation   and  Liability  Act  (CERCLA).   Both  published  literature  and
Information obtained  for  Agency Program Office  files are evaluated  as  they
pertain to potential human health,  aquatic  life  and environmental  effects of
hazardous waste  constituents.   The  literature searched for 1n  this  document
and  the  dates  searched  are  Included  In  "Appendix:  Literature  Searched."
Literature search  material  Is  current up  to 8 months previous  to the  final
draft  date  listed  on  the front  cover.   Final  draft document  dates  (front
cover) reflect the date the document Is sent to the Program Officer (OSHER).

    Several quantitative  estimates  are  presented  provided  sufficient  data
are available.   For systemic toxicants,  these  Include Reference  doses  (RfDs)
for  chronic   and  subchronlc  exposures  for  both  the Inhalation  and  oral
exposures.  The  subchronlc  or   partial  lifetime RfD Is  an  estimate of  an
exposure  level   that  would not  be expected  to  cause adverse  effects  when
exposure  occurs  during a  limited  time  Interval  I.e., for an  Interval  that
does  not  constitute a  significant portion  of  the  llfespan.  This   type  of
exposure  estimate  has  not been  extensively used,  or rigorously  defined  as
previous risk assessment  efforts  have  focused  primarily on lifetime  exposure
scenarios.   Animal data   used   for  subchronlc  estimates  generally  reflect
exposure  durations of  30-90  days.   The  general methodology  for  estimating
subchronlc RfOs  Is  the  same as  traditionally employed for  chronic estimates,
except that subchronlc data are utilized when available.

    In the case  of suspected carcinogens, RfOs  are  not estimated.   Instead,
a  carcinogenic  potency  factor, or   q-j*   (U.S.  EPA,  1980),   Is  provided.
These  potency  estimates  are  derived  for  both oral  and Inhalation  exposures
where possible.  In addition, unit  risk  estimates for air  and drinking water
are presented based on Inhalation and oral data, respectively.

    Reportable quantities  (RQs)  based on both chronic  toxldty  and  cardno-
genldty are derived.   The RQ  Is  used  to determine  the quantity of a hazard-
ous substance  for  which  notification  1s  required 1n  the event  of a release
as  specified  under  the  Comprehensive  Environmental  Response.  Compensation
and Liability  Act   (CERCLA).    These two RQs  (chronic toxldty  and  cardno-
genldty) represent two of six scores developed  (the remaining  four reflect
1gn1tab1l1tyt   reactivity, aquatic  toxldty,  and acute mammalian  toxldty).
Chemical-specific  RQs  reflect the lowest of  these six primary criteria.   The
methodology for  chronic  toxldty and  cancer  based  RQs  are  defined  In  U.S.
EPA, 1984 and 1986a. respectively.
                                      111

-------
                               EXECUTIVE  SUMMARY

    2-Chlorophenol 1s a colorless  to  yellow-brown  liquid  with  an  unpleasant.
penetrating odor.  It Is  soluble  1n alcohol,  ether  and  water  (Sax and Lewis,
1987;  Weast  et  al., 1988).   A  weak  add,  H  Is  freely  soluble  In  basic
solutions  (Frelter,  1981).  Current production volume data  were  not  located;
however, between  10,000  and 100,000  pounds  was  manufactured  or  Imported  In
the United  States In 1977  (TSCAPP,  1989).   Most of the  2-chloropheno1  pro-
duced  1s either  used directly  1n the synthesis  of  other  chlorinated phenols
or  as  an  Intermediate  In the  production  of   larger  synthetic  molecules.
Approximately IX  of  production 1s Isolated for  use  1n  disinfectants,  resins
and other specialty products (Frelter, 1981; Scow et al.,  1982).
    In  the  atmosphere,  2-chlorophenol Is  expected to  exist almost  entirely
1n  the  vapor  phase  (Suntlo   et  al., 1988).   The  gas-phase  reaction  with
photochemlcally produced  hydroxyl  radicals  1s expected  to  be  rapid,  with  an
estimated half-life  of  1.6 days  (Atkinson,  1985).   Nighttime  degradation  by
the gas-phase  reaction  with nitrate  radicals  1s expected  to  be  significant
In urban areas (Kanno and NoJIma,  1979).   Physical  removal  of  2-chlorophenol
by wet precipitation may also  occur.   In  water,  photolysis  and  mlcroblal
degradation are expected  to be significant.   In  basic waters,  the Ionic form
of 2-chlorophenol  undergoes rapid  photolysis.   The neutral form photollzes
more slowly (Boule et al.. 1982. 1984. 1987).
    Mlcroblal degradation under  aerobic  (Tabak  et  al., 1981;  Balrd  et  al.,
1974;  Lund and  Rodriguez, 1984;  SuflUa  and  Miller,   1985)  and  anaerobic
(Krumme  and  Boyd,  1988;   Battersby  and Wilson. 1989;   SuflUa   and  Miller,
1985)   conditions  has   been   demonstrated.   Bloconcentratlon   In   aquatic
organisms  1s  not  expected  to  be significant.  Volatilization from  water  to
                                      1v

-------
the  atmosphere  1s  expected;   however,  this  process  may  be  attenuated  by
adsorption  to  sediment  and  suspended  matter.   In soil,  blodegradatlon  Is
expected  to  be the  dominant   fate  process.   Mlcroblal  degradation  using  a
soil  Inoculum  has  been  demonstrated   under  aerobic   (Alexander  and  Aleem,
1961;  Ingols  et  al.,  1966;   Haller,   1978;  Klncannon  and  Lin,  1985)  and
anaerobic   (Boyd   et  al.,   1983;   Horowitz   et   al.,  1982)   conditions.
Volatilization  from the soil surface to the atmosphere  Is expected;  however,
1t may be attenuated by the process  of  adsorption.
    2-Chlorophenol can enter  the environment as a  result  of  Us  commercial
    •
-------
effect on biueglll or  sea  lamprey,  Petromyzon marlnus. but  produced  death  In
trout, Salmo galrdnerll. within 13  hours  (Applegate et al.t  1957).   Exposure
to  concentrations  <4 mg/l for  30  days  had no  effect  on eggs and larvae  of
fathead minnows  In an early  life  stage toxldty test {LeBlanc,  1983).   The
BCF  determined  In blueglll  was 214;  the elimination half-life  was <1  day
(Barrows  et al.,  1980).  Studies  using  freshwater  Invertebrates  revealed
that  toxic  effects  occurred  at concentrations  similar  to  those found  for
fish.   LC50 and  Immobilization  ECrQ values  In Daphnla  ranged   from  2.6-23
mg/l  (Bazln et al.,  1987; Oevlllers  and Chambon, 1986;  Keen and  Balllod,
1985; Kn1e  et  al.,  1983; Kopperman et  al., 1974; LeBlanc,  1980;  Randall  and
Knopp,  1980;  Tlssot  et  al.,   1985;  Trabalka  and  Bunch,  1978).   The  lethal
threshold  was   5.3  mg/l   1n  the  shrimp,  Crangon  septemsplnosa.  the  only
saltwater animal  studied.  Among  freshwater  algae,  EC5Q  values for  growth
Inhibition  were  70  mg/l  In  Selenastrum caprlcornutum.   and  170  mg/l  In
Chlorella vulgarls  (Shlgeoka   et  al.,  1988).   Effects  In  bacteria  Included
50%  reduction   1n  light  emitted   by  Photobacterlum  phosphoreum  at  14.7-40
mg/l  (Bazln et al.,  1987; Cunningham  et al.,  1986; Curtis  et  al.,  1982;
R1bo  and   Kaiser,   1983),  25-27%  reduction   In  nitrite   utilization   by
Nltrobacter  at  50  mg/l  (Wang and  Reed, 1984),  decreased  ATP  content  In
Escher1ch1a  coll   and  NUrosomonas  europaea  at  100-1000  mg/l   (Parker  and
Prlbyl,  1984)  and 50% reduction  In  bacterial   dehydrogenase  activity 1n  a
mixed bacterial culture  at 700 mg/l.  Among  terrestrial  organisms,  the  oral
LD5Q 1n red-winged blackbirds  was >113 mg/kg  (Schafer  et  al., 1983).
    Chlorophenols  as  a   class are  reportedly  absorbed  readily  from  the
gastrointestinal tract and from parenteral sites of  Injection (Delchmann  and
Kepllnger,  1981).  Orally administered 2-chlorophenol appears to be rapidly
and  almost   completely  absorbed  from  the  gastrointestinal  tracts  of  rats
                                      v1

-------
(Carpenter et  al.,  1985;  Houser, 1983)  and  chinchilla rabbits (Spencer and
Williams,  1950).   In ^n vitro  studies using  human  autopsy skin,  2-chloro-
phenol was  absorbed by the  epidermal  membrane with  a permeability  coeffi-
cient of 5.5lxlO'Vcm/m1n  (Roberts et al.,  1977).
    Following  oral  administration of  2-chlorophenol   to  rats, the  compound
was  found  In  the  liver and  kidney  (Exon  and  Koller, 1982),  but  metabolism
and excretion  occurred so rapidly that  there was  IHtle  distribution to  body
tissues (Carpenter et al., 1985).  Urinary excretion  accounted for  91% of  an
oral  dose  In  rats  wUhln  24 hours  of  treatment  (Carpenter  et al., 1985).
Over  90%  of   the  urinary  excretion  consisted of glucuronlde  and  sulfate  '
conjugates of  the  parent  compound,  and  <2%  consisted  of  unchanged parent
compound  (Carpenter et  al.,  1985).    Other  metabolites  Identified In  the
urine  of  treated   rats  Include  glucuronlde and   sulfate   conjugates  of
2-chlorohydroqu1none (Houser, 1983). an oxidation  product of  2-chlorophenol.
Glucuronlde  and  ethereal  suflate conjugates of  2-chlorophenol In  the  urine
of orally  treated chinchilla rabbits accounted for virtually  100% of an  oral
dose (Spencer and Williams.  1950).
    No Information  was  located  concerning the subchronlc or  chronic Inhala-
tion toxldty of 2-chlorophenol.
    In rats  dosed by gavage with 2-chlorophenol  at  65  or  130 mg/kg for  3
weeks, there were  reductions 1n weight gains  and  Increases  1n liver weights
when  compared  with  controls  (Chung,  1978).   Hematologlcal  effects   and
hepatic degeneration were  also noted at both treatment levels.
    In reports of a  subchronlc  drinking water  study  (Exon and Koller, 1983a,
1985) 1n which rats  were exposed  to  2-chlorophenol pre-,  post-, and pre- and
postnatally by the  dams and  then  In  the drinking  water at levels of 0,  5,  50
and  500  ppm for  <15 weeks,  no 1mmunolog1cal  effects  were observed at any
level.

-------
    In a  chronic  drinking  water  study  (Exon and Roller, 1985) In which rats
were  exposed  to  2-chlorophenol  prenatally  by  their dams  and then  1n  the
drinking  water  at levels of 0,  5,  50  and  500  ppm  for  <2 years, hemoglobin
levels,  R8C counts  and  PCV  were  all  significantly higher   In  the groups
exposed to 500 ppm than In controls.
    Chlorophenols  reportedly   Irritate  the  skin and   eyes,  and  the dusts
Irritate  the  respiratory tract  (FreHer,  1979).   In humans,  2-chlorophenol
causes  severe   burns,   liver  and  kidney   damage,  narcosis  and  respiratory
depression (Davis et al., 1959).
    Oral  l05Qs  of  670,  346-670  and 440  mg/kg  have  been reported  for  the
rat  (Delchmann,  1943),  the mouse  (Borzelleca  et al.,  1985;  Bubnov et al.,
1969) and the  blue fox  (Bubnov  et  al.,  1969),  respectively.   A single oral
dose  of  300  mg/kg  caused  kidney  and  liver  damage   1n  Gunn  rats,  which
appeared  to be  more  sensitive  to  the  compound  than  Sprague-Oawley  rats
(Houser,  1983).   An oral  dose of  63 mg/kg  caused motor  Impairment 1n CO-1
mice  within  5   minutes,  and a dose of  1  mg/kg  produced  behavioral change
after 2  days  (Borzelleca,  1983).   A gavaged dose of 175  mg/kg resulted  In
80% mortality  In  mice,  with a statistically significant  weight loss before
death;  hyperactlvlty  was  seen at   lower  doses  (Kallman et  al.,  1982).    In
rats,  a  median   lethal  IntraperUoneal  dose  of 230  mg/kg  caused  excited
behavior  and  convulsions,  with  a  decrease 1n  body temperature  (Farquharson
et al.. 1958).
    No  Information  on   cardnogenldty  of  2-chlorophenol  from  Inhalation
exposures  could  be  located.   A carc1nogen1c1ty-cocardnogen1c1ty  drinking
water study (Exon and  Roller,  1985) In which rats were exposed  to  2-chloro-
phenol In utero  and  then  In  drinking  water at  concentrations <500 ppm was
negative  for cardnogenlclty after  2 years of exposure.  In  the same study,
2-chlorophenol   appeared to promote  the cardnogenlcHy  of  ENU,  Increasing

-------
the  tumor  Incidence  and decreasing the  t1me-to-tumor  In  male rats.  Dermal
application  of   2-chlorophenol  following  Initiation  by  DMBA  promoted  the
formation of skin tumors 1n mice (Boutwell  and Bosch, 1959).
    Up  to   1000  yg/plate  2-chlorophenol  was  negative for  mutagenlclty  1n
four  strains  of  Salmonella typhlmurlum. with and without metabolic  activa-
tion  (Haworth et al., 1983).  It did  not  Induce  SCEs or affect  DMA synthesis
In  mice dosed with  75-300  mg/kg   (Borzelleca,  1983).  Chromatld  deletions
were  reported  1n rat bone marrow  cells  from treatment with  130 mg/kg  every
other day for 1  week  (Chung, 1978).
    No  Information on the  teratogenldty of  2-chlorophenol could be located.
Reproductive  effects were  reported  In  rats  exposed to  2-chlorophenol  1n
drinking water from  weaning through breeding  and  lactation  (Exon and  Koller,
1982, 1985).  Reduced  Utter  sizes and Increased number of  stillbirths were
seen  In  rats  exposed to 500 ppm 2-chlorophenol;  these effects  were not seen
at <50 ppm.
    Although drinking water (Exon  and  Koller,  1985)  and dermal  (Boutwell and
Bosch,  1959)  exposure  studies suggested that  2-chlorophenol  may  be  a  tumor
promoting agent,  data were  Inadequate  to Implicate  the chemical  as a  primary
carcinogen.  The chemical was assigned to  U.S.  EPA  Group  0:  not classifiable
as  to cardnogenldty  In  humans.   Ne1th«r  cancer   potencies  nor   a  cancer-
based RQ were derived.
    U.S.  EPA  (1986b)  derived  an   RfO  for  chronic  oral   exposure of  0.005
mg/kg/day  from  the  24-month drinking  water  study  using rats  by Exon  and
Koller  (1985).   This  value  1s  verified  and available  on  IRIS  (U.S.  EPA,
1988).  A chronic  (noncancer) tox1cUy-based  RQ  of  1000 was  calculated  based
on  reproductive  effects  observed  1n rats exposed to drinking water contain-
ing 500 ppm 2-chlorophenol (Exon and Koller, 1982).
                                      1x

-------
                              TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.  INTRODUCTION	'	     1

    1.1.   STRUCTURE AND CAS NUMBER	     1
    1.2.   PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL PROPERTIES 	     1
    1.3.   PRODUCTION DATA	     2
    1.4.   USE DATA	     2
    1.5.   SUMMARY	     3

2.  ENVIRONMENTAL FATE AND TRANSPORT	     4

    2.1.   AIR	     4

           2.1.1.   Reaction with Hydroxyl Radicals  	     4
           2.1.2.   Reaction with Ozone .'..	     4
           2.1.3.   Photolysis	:	     4
           2.1.4.   Physical Removal Processes	     4

    2.2.   WATER	     5

           2.2.1.   Hydrolysis	     5
           2.2.2.   Oxidation 	     5
           2.2.3.   Photolysis	     5
           2.2.4.   M1crob1al Degradation 	     5
           2.2.5.   B1oconcentrat1on	     6
           2.2.6.   Adsorption	     6
           2.2.7.   Volatilization	     6

    2.3.   SOIL"	     7

           2.3.1.   M1crob1al Degradation 	     7
           2.3.2.   Adsorption	     8
           2.3.3.   Volatilization	     8

    2.4.   SUMMARY	     8

3.  EXPOSURE	    10

    3.1.   HATER	    10
    3.2.   FOOD	    11
    3.3.   INHALATION	    11
    3.4.   DERMAL	    11
    3.5.   OTHER	>	    11
    3.6.   SUMMARY	    12

-------
                         TABLE OF CONTENTS (cont.)

                                                                       Page
4.  ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY	    13

    4.1.    AQUATIC TOXICOLOGY 	    13

           4.1.1.   Acute Toxic Effects on Fauna	    13
           4.1.2.   Chronic Effects on Fauna	    16
           4.1.3.   Effects on Flora	    17
           4.1.4.   Effects on Bacteria 	    17

    4.2.    TERRESTRIAL TOXICOLOGY 	    18

           4.2.1.   Effects on Fauna	    18
           4.2.2..J  Effects on Flora	    18

    4.3.    FIELD STUDIES	    18
    4.4.    AQUATIC RISK ASSESSMENT	    19
    4.5.    SUMMARY	    19

5.  PHARMACOKINETCS	    22

    5.1.    ABSORPTION	    22
    5.2.    DISTRIBUTION	    23
    5.3.    METABOLISM	    24
    5.4.    EXCRETION	"	    24
    5.5.    SUMMARY	    25

6.  EFFECTS	    26

    6.1.    SYSTEMIC TOXICITY	    26

           6.1.1.   Inhalation Exposure 	    26
           6.1.2.   Oral Exposure	    26
           6.1.3.   Other Relevant Information	    27

    6.2.    CARCINOGENICITY	    29

           6.2.1.   Inhalation	    29
           6.2.2.   Oral	    29
           6.2.3.   Other Relevant Information	    30

    6.3.    MUTAGENICITY	    32
    6.4.    DEVELOPMENTAL TOXICITY	'	    32
    6.5.    OTHER REPRODUCTIVE EFFECTS  	    34
    6.6.    SUMMARY	    35

7.  EXISTING GUIDELINES AND STANDARDS  	    38

    7.1.    HUMAN	    38
    7.2.    AQUATIC	    38
                                     x1

-------
                           TABLE  OF  CONTENTS  (cont.)



 8.  RISK ASSESSMENT	   39

     8.1.   CARCINOGENICITY	   39

            8.1.1.   Inhalation	   39
            8.1.2.   Oral	   39
            8.1.3.   Other Routes	   39
            8.1.4.   Weight of Evidence	   39
            8.1.5.   Quantitative Risk Estimates 	   40

     8.?.   SYSTEMIC TOXICITY	   40

            8.2.1.   Inhalation Exposure 	   40
            8.2.2.   Oral Exposure	   40

 9.  REPORTA8LE QUANTITIES 	   43

     9.1.   BASED ON SYSTEMIC TOXICITY .'	   43
     9.2.   BASED ON CARCINOGENICITY	;	   43

10.  REFERENCES	   45

APPENDIX A: LITERATURE  SEARCHED	   63
APPENDIX B: SUMMARY TABLE FOR 2-CHLOROPHENOL 	   66
APPENDIX C: DOSE/DURATION RESPONSE GRAPH(S) FOR EXPOSURE TO
            2-CHLOROPHENOL 	   67

-------
                             LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
ATP                     Adenoslne  tMphosphate
BCF                     B1oconcentrat1on factor
CAS                     Chemical  Abstract Service
CS                      Composite  score
OMBA                    9,lO-d1methy1-l,2-benzath1acene
ONA                     OeoxyMbonuclelc add
OWEL                    Drinking  water  exposure  level
EC5Q                    Concentration  effective  to  50% of  recplents
                        (and all  other  subscripted  dose  levels)
£050                    Effective  dose  to 50% of recipients
ENU                     Ethylnltrosourea
GMAV                    Genus mean  acute value
GMCV                    Genus mean  chronic value
Koc                     Soil sorptlon  coefficient
Kow                     Octanol/water  partition  coefficient
LC5Q                    Concentration  lethal  to  50% of recipients
                        (and all  other  subscripted  dose  levels)
1050                    Dose lethal to  50% of recipients
MATC                    Maximum acceptable toxicant concentration
MED                     Minimum effective dose
LOAEL                   Lowest-observed-adverse-effect level
NOAEL                   No-observed-adverse-effect  level
NOEL                    No-observed-effect level
PCV                     Packed cell volume
pKa                     The negative logarithm  (to  the base  10)  of  the
                        equilibrium constant, K,  for the reaction of
                        chlorophenol with add

-------
                         LIST  OF  ABBREVIATIONS  (cont.)
ppb                     Parts per billion
ppm                     Parts per million
RBC                     Red blood cells
RfO                     Reference dose
RQ                      Reportable quantity
RVd                     Dose-rating value
RVe                     Effect-rating value
SCE                     Sister-chromatld exchange
TLffl                     Median tolerance limit
w/v                     Weight per volume
                                      x1v

-------
                               1.  INTRODUCTION
1.1.   STRUCTURE AND CAS NUMBER
    2-Chlorophenol  1s  also known as  ortho-chlorophenol,  2-chloro-1-hydroxy-
benzene  and  2-hydroxychlorobenzene  (Chemllne,   1989;   SANSS,   1989).   The
structure. Chemical Abstracts  Service Registry number, empirical  formula and
molecular weight are as follows:
CAS number:  95-57-8
Empirical formula:  C.H.C10
                     o b
Molecular weight:  128.56
1.2.   PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL PROPERTIES
    2-Chlorophenol 1s a colorless  to  yellow-brown  liquid with  an  unpleasant,
penetrating odor  (Sax and  Lewis,  1987).  It  Is  soluble 1n alcohol,  ether,
benzene  and water (Sax and  Lewis,  1987; Ueast et  al.,  1988).  A weak  add
(pKa •  8.5 at  25'C),  U Is  freely  soluble  1n alkaline solutions  (Frelter,
1981).    Selected  chemical  and physical properties for 2-chlorophenol  are  as
follows:
    Melting point:
    Boiling point:
    Density at 25'C:
    Vapor pressure at 25'C:
    water solubility at 25'C:
    Kow:
    Conversion factors at 25'C:
8.7'C
175-176'C
1.2573 g/ml
2.35 ram Hg
11,350 mg/i
2.15
1 mg/m» • 0.19 ppm
1 ppm -5.25 mg/m*
Frelter. 1981
Frelter, 1981
Ulndholz et al., 1983
Suntlo et al., 1988
Banerjee et al., 1980
Hansch and Leo, 1985
0220d
  -1-
              09/18/89

-------
1.3.   PRODUCTION DATA
    During  1977,  one  company  manufactured  and   two   companies   Imported
2-chlorophenol  In  the United States.   A plant  operated  by Monsanto Co.  In
Sauget,  IL,   produced between  10,000  and  100,000  pounds  (TSCAPP,  1989).
Current production data  were not  located  In the available  literature  dted
In Appendix A.
    2-Chlorophenol can  be  synthesized  by  several  methods,  some  of  which
produce  either  the   2-chloro  or   the  4-chloro  Isomer   selectively.    The
reaction  of   phenol   with   tert-butylhypochlorlte  1s  more  likely  to  form
2-chlorophenol  than   4-chlorophenol.    Sodium  p-phenol  sulfonate,   prepared
from  phenol,  can  be chlorinated  and  desulfonated  to give  2-chlorophenol.
Hydrolysis of  1,2-d1chlorobenzene  with  strong  bases  1n   the  presence of  a
catalyst produces  2-chlorophenol.  Ortho-chlorocumene  can  be oxidized  to  the
corresponding  peroxide  and converted  to 2-chlorophenol.    2-Chlorophenol  Is
produced,   along  with numerous  other  chlorinated  phenol  Isomers,  by  the
direct  chlorlnatlon   of  phenol   at elevated  temperatures.  Purification  of
this  complex  mixture  Is  one  method  of  obtaining  2-chlorophenol  (Frelter,
1981).
1.4.   USE DATA
    Most  commercially  produced  2-chlorophenol   1s   used  directly  In  the
synthesis  of higher  chlorinated  phenols  or  as  a  chemical  Intermediate  In  the
production of  larger  synthetic molecules.   Approximately  IX of total produc-
tion  Is Isolated  for use as a preservative,  1n  specialized phenolic resins,
as a  specialty  solvent  In  the rubber  Industry,  as a polymer Intermediate In
the   manufacture  of  f1re-retardant varnishes  and  as an amlnlzlng  agent  for
cotton fabric (Frelter,  1981; Scow et al., 1982).
0220d                               -2-                              08/09/89

-------
1.5.   SUMMARY
    2-Chlorophenol 1s a colorless  to  yellow-brown  liquid  with  an  unpleasant,
penetrating odor.  It 1s soluble  1n alcohol,  ether  and water (Sax and Lewis,
1987;  Ueast  et  al., 1988).   A  weak  add,  H  Is  freely  soluble  1n  basic
solutions (Frelter,  1981).  Current production  volume  data  were not located;
however, between  10,000  and 100,000  pounds  was manufactured or  Imported  In
the United States In 1977  (TSCAPP,  1989).   Most of  the  2-chlorophenol  pro-
duced  1s either  used directly  In  the  synthesis  of  other  chlorinated phenols
or  a.s   an  Intermediate  In the  production  of  larger  synthetic  molecules.
    •f
Approximately IX  of  production  Is Isolated for  use  1n  disinfectants,  resins
and other specialty products (Frelter, 1981; Scow et al.,  1982).
0220d                               -3-                              09/18/89

-------
                     2.  ENVIRONMENTAL FATE  AND  TRANSPORT
2.1.   AIR
    HHh  a  vapor  pressure  at  25*C  of  2.35 mm  Hg (Suntlo  et  al.,  1988),
2-chlorophenol probably  exists almost  entirely  In  the vapor phase 1n  the
atmosphere (E1senr1ch et al.,  1981).
2.1.1.   Reaction with  Hydroxyl Radicals.   An  estimated  rate  constant  for
the  gas-phase  reaction  of  2-chlorophenol  with  photochemically   produced
hydroxyl  radicals  Is   1.03xlO"11   cm'/mol-sec  (Atkinson,  1985).    Assuming
an   average   atmospheric    hydroxyl    radical    concentration   of   5xl09
molecule/cm3  (Atkinson,  1985),  then the half-life  for  this reaction  Is  1.6
days.   2-Chlorophenol  reacts   In  the dark  with  nitrogen  oxides  (Kanno  and
NoJIma,     1979).      The     yields     of      2-chloro-6-n1trophenol     and
                 *
2-chloro-4-n1trophenol   after   5  hours  1n   a  NO   reactor  were 30  and  36X,
respectively,   of  the   original  material.    Thus,  the  nighttime  gas-phase
reaction  of  2-chlorophenol  with nitrate radicals may  be an  Important  fate
process In urban atmospheres.
2.1.2.   Reaction with  Ozone.  The atmospheric  reaction  of  2-chlorophenol
with ozone Is  not expected to  be an Important fate process (Atkinson, 1985).
2.1.3.   Photolysis.   Sufficient   data   are  not  available  to  predict   the
Importance  of  the   photolysis  of  2-chlorophenol  1n   the  atmosphere.   The
un-1on1zed  form  undergoes  photolytlc  breakdown  In  water;  however,  this  1s
believed  to  result  from  stabilization  of   the  polar zwHteMonlc  transition
state by water (Boule et  al.,  1982, 1984.  1987).   This  type of stabilization
Is not possible 1n the gas phase.
2.1.4.   Physical  Removal  Processes.    Based   on  the   water  solubility  of
2-chlorophenol,  11,350  mg/i  at  25'C  (Banerjee et al.,  1980),  wet deposi-
tion may be a significant fate process.

0220d                               -4-                              11/01/89

-------
2.2.   WATER
2.2.1.   Hydrolysis.   2-Chlorophenol  1s not  expected  to undergo  hydrolysis
In water,  as  1t contains no readily hydrolyzable  functional  groups  (Harris,
1982).
2.2.2.   Oxidation.   Pertinent data  regarding  the oxidation  of  2-chloro-
phenol  In  water   were not  located 1n the  available  literature  cited  In
Appendix A.
2.2.3.   Photolysis.   The  laboratory photolysis  of 2-chlorophenol  at a  pH
of 9  (Ionized  form)  at 296 nm rapidly  produced  chloride 1on  and  cyclopenta-  ;
                                                                             •1
                                                                              V
dlene carboxylates,  the .latter dlmerlzlng  under  the reaction  conditions.   In  V
the relatively  dilute concentration expected In  the  environment,  dlmerlza-
tlon  of  the reaction  products Is  not  expected.   Photolysis  of  the  neutral
species (acidic  pH)  produced  both cyclopentadlenlc adds and  catechol,  with
a rate of  disappearance  1  order  of magnitude less  than  that  for  the Ionized
form (Boule et al.. 1982, 1984, 1987).
2.2.4.   M1crob1al  Degradation.    In  a  screening  study,  2-chlorophenol  at
concentrations  of  5 and  10  mg/mi  underwent  86  and 83% aerobic  degradation
In 7  days  using  a  settled  domestic wastewater  Inoculum.   The  second  sub-
culture allowed complete degradation of both  samples  1n  the  same  time period
(Tabak et  al., 1981).   2-Chlorophenol  at a  concentration of 1,  10  and  100
mg/l  underwent  100.  100  and 17% degradation  after  3,  3  and  6  hours,
respectively,  using  a sewage  sludge   seed   under  aerobic  conditions.   The
decrease  1n degradation  at 100 mg/i  Is believed  to  be  due  to  the  toxlclty
of the microbes  to elevated concentrations of this  substrate  (Balrd et  al.,
1974).
    Domestic  sewage  treatment plant  sludge  was  successfully acclimated  to
2-chlorophenol  within 24  days (Lund and  Rodriguez,  1984).   2-Chlorophenol
underwent  aerobic blodegradatlon  using water  from a  pristine  aquifer  and
0220d                               -5-                              09/18/89

-------
when  combined with  acclimated 'organisms  In  groundwater  obtained  near  a
municipal  waste  site;  degradation  was  complete In  9  and  6 days,  respec-
tively.  Using  these same  sources  of  microorganisms under  anaerobic  condi-
tions, degradation occurred only  In aquifers that were  actively  methanogenlc
(Sufllta and Miller,  1985).
    That  the  anaerobic  mineralization of  2-chlorophenol requires  methano-
genlc microorganisms  was also demonstrated using an  upflow bloreactor  and  an
acclimated sludge  Inoculum  (Krumme  and Boyd, 1988).   However, 2-chlorophenol
at  a  concentration  of  50  mg  C/l  did  not   undergo  anaerobic  degradation
under methanogenlc conditions In  a  screening  test using  an  aerobic digester
sludge  (Battersby  and  Wilson.   1989).   The  failure  for 2-chlorophenol  to
undergo degradation  may  be  due  to a high- concentration  of substrate used  In
this study.
2.2.5.   B1oconcentrat1on.  A BCF  of   214 was  determined for  2-chlorophenol
using blueglll  sunflsh,  Lepomls macrochlrus.  1n a continual-flow system for
28 days  of exposure  (Barrows et  al.,  1980).   This  value suggests  that bio-
concentration In fish and aquatic organisms  1s  not an Important fate process.
2.2.6.   Adsorption.   2-Chlorophenol was  found  In  8X of  water  samples taken
from Lake  Ketekmeer  1n  the Netherlands but not  In  sediment  samples from the
lake  (detection   limit,  10  wg/kg)   (Wegman  and   van  den  Broek,  1983).
Adsorption of phenols to  sediment and  suspended  organic matter appears to be
a  complicated  process,  and Its   Importance  can   vary  widely  with  local
conditions (Section 2.3.2.).
2.2.7.   Volatilization.   Based  on a Henry's  Law  constant  of  8.14xlO~»
atncmVmol  at  25°C   (Smith  et  al.,   1983),   an  estimated  volatilization
half-life  for  a  model river  1  m  deep, flowing 1 m/sec with  a wind velocity
of  3 m/sec  Is  5.2  days  (Thomas,  1982).  Volatilization from water  to the


0220d                               -6-                              09/18/89

-------
atmosphere  may,  therefore,  be  significant.   Adsorption  to  sediment  and
suspended organic matter, however, may attenuate this process.
2.3.   SOIL
2.3.1.   H1crob1al  Degradation.   The  aerobic  degradation of  2-chlorophenol
at  an Initial  concentration  of  100  mg/i was  complete  In  3  days  using  an
activated soil  sludge Inoculum  (Ingols  et al., 1966).   Aerobic  degradation
of  2-chlorophenol  (16 mg/i)  by  unadapted  supernatant from domestic  waste-
water  sludge  was  complete  In  14-25  days.  Using  a soil Inoculum,  aerobic
degradation did not occur In >25 days (Mailer,  1978).
    2-Chlorophenol,  added  as  a  component of  a  complex mixture  to  three
undisturbed soils  (ranging  from  clay  to  sandy)  1n a glass biological  soil
reactor, underwent  aerobic  degradation,  with half-lives  ranging  from  28-228
days  (Klncannon  and Lin, 1985).   2-Chlorophenol  underwent  complete  aerobic
degradation,  using  two  different  soils.  In  14 and  47  days  (Alexander  and
Aleem. 1961).
    2-Chlorophenol was completely  degraded In  3 weeks using a sewage  sludge
seed  under  anaerobic  conditions.   Phenol was Identified  as  an early product
In  this  transformation;  thus, the  first  step  Is  believed to  be  loss  of  the
chlorine  substltuent   (Boyd   et  al.,   1983).   Anaerobic  degradation   of
2-chlorophenol  using  freshwater   sediment  and  a   digester  sludge  Inoculum
occurred In >29 and  >8 weeks,  respectively (Horowitz et  al..  1982).   Aerobic
degradation of  100  pg/g (wet  weight)  2-chlorophenol  1n a  clay soil  loam
was very rapid;  complete degradation was seen  1n 1.5  days.  Under  anaerobic
conditions with the  same  soil,  78% degradation  occurred  after  80 days  (Baker
and Mayfleld, 1980).   2-Chlorophenol  at  an Initial  concentration of  100  ppm
In  a  clay  loam underwent 91  and 94%  degradation under  anaerobic conditions
at  4°C  (6.5 days) and 0°C  (8 days), respectively.   In sediment  from a small
0220d                               -7-                              08/09/89

-------
stream.  It  underwent  100% degradation  In  10-15  days  at  20°C,  and  78%
degradation In 30 days at 0°C (Baker et al.. 1980).
2.3.2.   Adsorption.   Experimental   K    values  obtained  In  sediment   from
Lake  Zoar,  CT,  were  4890  for  fine  samples  and 3990  for coarse  samples
(Isaacson and  F1nk,  1984).  For phenols,  subtle factors such as  pH  and the
organic, mineral or  metal  Ion  content can  drastically  Influence  the  adsorp-
tion  characteristics  of  2-chlorophenol.    The  formation  of hydrogen  bonds
with the organic matter or  the  formation  of complexes  with metallic Ions are
probably more  Important  than hydrophoblc  forces.   2-Chlorophenol  vapors also
strongly  adsorb  to  sediment   (Isaacson,   1985).   An  experimental  K    of
51.15 was  obtained  on a Brookston  clay loam (Boyd, 1982).   Apparently, the
process  of  adsorption Involves  several subtle  factors that  can  vary widely
with the local conditions.
2.3.3.   Volatilization.   Based on  the  vapor   pressure  of  2-chlorophenol,
2.35  mm Hg  at  25°C  (Suntlo et  al.,  1988),  volatilization from  the soil
surface  to  the atmosphere  may  occur.  However,  the rate  of volatilization
may be attenuated due  to adsorption.
2.4.   SUMMARY
    In  the  atmosphere, 2-chlorophenol  Is  expected to  exist  almost entirely
In  the  vapor  phase  (Suntlo et  al.,  1988).  The  gas-phase reaction with
photochemically produced hydroxyl  radicals  1s expected to  be rapid,  with an
estimated half-life  of 1.6 days (Atkinson.  1985).   Nighttime degradation by
the gas-phase  reaction with nitrate  radicals 1s  expected  to be  significant
1n urban areas  (Kanno and  NoJIma,  1979).   Physical removal of 2-chlorophenol
by  wet  precipitation  may  also occur.   In  water, photolysis and microblal
degradation are expected to  be  significant.  In basic  waters, the  Ionic form
of  2-chlorophenol  undergoes rapid  photolysis.   The neutral  form  photollzes

0220d                               -8-                              08/09/89

-------
more  slowly  (Boule  et al.,  1982.  1984,  1987).   H1crob1al degradation  under
aerobic  (Tabak  et  al., 1981; Balrd  et  al.,  1974; Lund and  Rodriguez,  1984;
SuflUa  and  Miller,  1985)  and  anaerobic (Krumme  and  Boyd,  1988;  Battersby
and  Wilson,   1989;  Sufi Ha  and Miller,  1985)   conditions   has  been  demon-
strated.   Bloconcentratlon  In   aquatic  organisms   Is  not  expected  to  be
significant.   Volatilization  from  water  to  the atmosphere Is  expected;  how-
ever, this process may be  attenuated  by  adsorption  to  sediment and suspended
matter.   In   soil,   blodegradatlon  Is   expected  to  be  the  dominant  fate
process.  Mlcroblal  degradation using a  soil Inoculum has been  demonstrated
under aerobic (Alexander and Aleem,  1961; Ingols  et  al.,  1966; Haller, 1978;
Klncannon and Lin, 1985)  and anaerobic   (Boyd et  al.,  1983;  Horowitz  et al..
1982) conditions.  Volatilization  from the soil  surface  to. the atmosphere  1s
expected; however.  It may be attenuated  by  the process  of adsorption.
0220d                               -9-                              08/09/89

-------
                                 3.   EXPOSURE

    2-Chlorophenol  can  enter  the environment  as a  fugitive emission  from
commercial plants  that  synthesize or use  this  compound.  It can  also  enter
the environment  as a product  of the chemical  or biological degradation  of
other  anthropogenic compounds.
    An  estimated  934  workers   are  potentially  exposed  to  2-chlorophenol
(NIOSH,  1984).    Occupational  exposure   may  occur  by  Inhalation  or  dermal
contact  during   the  production,  purification  and  formulation  of  2-chloro-
phenol.   Sufficient  data  are  not  available   to predict  exposure  to  the
general population.
3.1.   WATER
    2-Chlorophenol  has  been qualitatively  Identified  1n  drinking water  In
the United  States  (Kool  et al..  1982; Lucas.  1984)  and  In 1/10  effluent
samples  from Industrial  and  publicly   owned  treatment  plants  In  Illinois
(Ellis et  al.,   1982).  2-Chlorophenol  was found  at  a  concentration  of  <10
wg/l  In   primary  effluent   from publicly  owned  treatment  plants  1n  Los
Angeles,  San Diego  and  Orange  County,  CA  (Young,  1978).   2-Chlorophenol  was
found   In  2% of  48  source  samples,  taken  to  determine  possible  routes  of
contamination to  the  Influent  of two sewage treatment  plants, at  an  average
concentration of 15  ppb  (Callahan  et  al.,  1979).   It  was  Identified as  a
constituent of chlorinated municipal sewage effluent  at a  concentration of 2
ppb (Bourquln  and  Gibson,  1978).   2-Chlorophenol  was  not  detected  1n  raw
water   samples  obtained  at  drinking  water  treatment  plants  In  six  Canadian
cities  and  was  found   1n  one  of  six  samples  of  treated  water  at  a
concentration of  39 ng/i  (SUhole et al., 1986).  It  was also found  In  IX
of  86 samples   taken  from  19  dtles   during  the Nationwide  Urban  Runoff


0220d                                -10-                             09/18/89

-------
Program  at  a  concentration  of  2  yg/l  (Cole  et   al.,   1984).    In   the
Netherlands,  U  was  found  at  concentrations <21  yg/l In  the effluent  of
the following  Industries,  none  of  which  produced 2-chlorophenol:  herbicides,
organic dyes  and  agrochemlcals  (Berbee,  1986).   It Is a known component  of
pulp mill  effluent (Suntlo et al.,  1988).
    2-Chlorophenol was found  In groundwater  samples obtained  near  a  chemical
manufacturing plant  1n Australia  (Stepan et al., 1981).  It  was  found  In  2X
of 1976 samples  taken In 1976  from  the  Rhine River 1n the Netherlands  at  a
maximum concentration  of  2.3  yg/l;  U  was  not  found  In  any  samples  taken
from the same river In 1987 (Wegman and Hoestee,  1979).
3.2.   FOOD
    Pertinent  data  regarding exposure.to  2-chlorophenol  through food  were
not located In the available literature cited In  Appendix A.
3.3.   INHALATION
    Data on the atmospheric  concentration of 2-chlorophenol  are lacking.  It
was Identified In  effluent from waste Incinerators In  three  of five samples
at concentrations ranging from 6.9-13 yg/mi  (James et  al..  1984).
3.4.   DERMAL
    Pertinent  data  regarding  dermal  exposure  to 2-chlorophenol  were  not
located 1n the available literature dted In Appendix  A.
3.5.   OTHER
    2-Chlorophenol may be  formed In  the  atmosphere  by  the  sequential, photo-
Initiated  degradation of  chlorobenzene  or  2-n1trochlorobenzene  (Kanno and
NoJIma, 1979).   It  can also  be  formed by the chlorlnatlon of  phenol  In the
disinfection  of   drinking  water  (Carlson  and   Caples,  1975;  Joshlpura  and
Kellher, 1980).   It  Is formed  In  water  by  the  photo1nU1ated  hydrolysis  of
l,4-d1chlorobenzene  (Boule  et  al.,   1985).   Thermolysis  of  two  different

0220d                               -11-                             09/18/89

-------
vinyl1dene chloride  polymers  at 200-600'C  produced  an average  of  13.5 and
11.3 yg of 2-chlorophenol/g of polymer  (Yasuhara  and  Morlta,  1988).
3.6.   SUMMARY
    2-Chlorophenol  can enter  the  environment as  a  result of  Us commercial
synthesis or  use.  2-Chlorophenol  may be released to  the  environment  through
Us  formation  by chemical  transformations  on other  anthropogenic  compounds
(Kanno and NoJIma,  1979;  Carlson  and  Caples, 1975;  Joshlpura and  Kellher,
1980; Boule et al.,  1985; Yasuhara  and  Morlta, 1988).
    Data on the occurrence of 2-chlorophfcnol  1n?the  environment  are lacking.
                                        •:!f
The  compound  has been   qualitatively  Identified In  drinking water  In  the
United States  (Kool  et  al..  1982;  Lucas,  1984)  and  quantified  1n  effluents
from  publicly owned  treatment plants  (Ellis  et al.,   1982;  Young,  1978;
Callahan et al.,  1979; Bourquln and Gibson,  1978).
0220d                               -12-                             09/18/89

-------
                         4.  ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY
4.1.   AQUATIC TOXICOLOGY
4.1.1.   Acute  Toxic  Effects  on  Fauna.  Many  studies  regarding  the  acute
toxldty  of  2-chlorophenol   to   cladoceran   Invertebrates  have  been  done.
Studies  on  daphnlds   Included mostly   static  48-hour  tests  conducted  In
18-22'C  water   with  Daphnla  magna  that  were <24  hours  old.   The  48-hour
EC50  values reported  for  Immobilization of  Daphnla  varied  from  2.6-7.43
mg/l  In  these  tests.  Details  of  the  Individual  studies  are  presented  In
Table 4-1.
    The toxldty of 2-chlorophenol  has  been  examined  In two species  of  salt-
water  Invertebrates: the  shrimp,  Cranqon  septemsplnosa. and the  soft-shelled
clam,  Hya  arenaMa (HcLeese  et  al.,  1979).   Three  members of each  species
were  exposed  simultaneously  to each concentration  for 96  hours at  10*C.   A
lethal threshold was  determined  based  on the time to  SOX  mortality  at each
chemical  concentration.    The  96-hour   lethal  threshold  (geometric  mean  of
highest concentration  with no mortality  and  next  highest  concentration with
100X  mortality) In  shrimp  was   5.3  mg/l.    The  data  were Insufficient  to
generate a   lethal threshold for clams.
    Pickering  and   Henderson   (1966)  performed  acute  toxldty  tests  on  a
series of  freshwater fish,  Including bluegllls,  Lepomls macrochlrus.  fathead
minnows,  Plmephales promelas,   goldfish,  Carasslus  auratus.  and  gupples,
PoedHa retlculata.   Ten  of  each spedes (two groups  of  five)  were exposed
to  nominal  concentrations  of  2-chlorophenol  under static  conditions  1n soft
water  (pH«7.5;  alkalinity-IB mg/l;  hardness-20  mg/l)  at 25°C.   Toxldty
was  similar In  three  of  these  species,  with 96-hour  LC5Q values  of  10.00
mg/l   In  bluegllls,  11.63  mg/l   1n  fathead minnows,  and  12.37  mg/l  In
goldfish.   Gupples, which  were slightly  less  susceptible to 2-chlorophenol,


0220d                               -13-                             09/18/89

-------
0
ro
r\j
o
ex









1
^^
1













Acute loxtclty Studies
Species Age lest experimental Design
lype
Oaphnla magna <24 hours static >S nonlnal concentrations
3 replicates/concentration
n • S/repltcate
0. magna <24 hours static 2 replicates/concentration

0. magna <24 hours static 2 tests

0. reagna >24 hours static >3 tests
4 concentrations/test
4 replicates/concentration
n - S/repllcate
0. magna NR Nfi 3 tests
0. magna NR ' NR NR

0. magna <72 hours static 3 tests
4 replicates/concentration
n • 5/repllcate
0. aagna NR NR NR


Daphnla pulen <24 hours static 10 replicates/concentration
n * 2/repltcate
1ABK 4-1

In Qaphnla


Using 2-Chlorophenot
Icnperature Ourat lon/tndpolnt
CC)
22


18

22

IB



NR
20

20


NR


20

24 -hour lC$o
46-hour tC«,o
48 hour IC0
48 -hour 1C 1,0
(liwobl Miatton)
48 -hour ECso
(tmoblltialton)
48 hour tC^o



24 -hour (€50
(lonobl Itiatton)
24 -hour lC«,o
(lowobl 11 ration)
24 -hour tC^o
(Innobtlt/alton)

"50
fC0
tc)00
96 -hour IC^Q




Concentration
>22 »g/l
2.6 (2.1 3.2)«g/t
1.0 MJ/I
3.91(3.31-4.91) *g/l

6.20 rog/l

7.43 ng/t



8 ng/1
11.7 ng/i

17.95 (16.6-19.3) *g/t


23 mg/l
10 mg/t
64 rog/l
6.9 mg/l




Reference
LeBlanc. I960


Keen and
Balllod. 1985
Randall and
Knopp. 1980
Koppernan
et al.. 1974


Baitn et al.,
1987
llssot
et al.. 1985
Devi Hers and
Chambon. 1986

Knle et al.,
1983

Irabalka and
Burch. 1978
o
00
NR -- Not reported
CD
CD

-------
had  a  96-hour  LC5Q  of  20.17  mg/i.   In  a  second  assay,  performed only
with  fathead  minnows,  a hard  dilution  water  was  used with higher pH  (8.2),
alkalinity  (300 mg/i)  and  hardness  (360  mg/l)   than  the soft  water;  the
96-hour  LC-g  1n  hard  water  (14.48 mg/i)  was not  significantly different
from  that obtained  using  soft  water  (11.63  mg/l).   This  Indicates  that
these water quality  variables  did  not  affect  the  toxldty  of  2-chlorophenol
In this  study.   The 24-hour KL.  values  for  blueglll, goldfish  and  gupples
were  slightly higher  than the 96-hour  values  for these  species,  Indicating
that  most  deaths  occurred early In  the study.  Only In  fathead  minnows  was
the  96-hour  LC5Q  (11.63  mg/l)  significantly  lower  than  the 24-hour  value
(21.96  mg/l),  suggesting  the  occurrence  of   significant  mortality  during
the second and third days of the study.
    Acute  toxldty  studies  by  other authors have  generally reported  similar
results.   Buccafusco et  al.  (1981) examined the acute  toxldty  of  2-chloro-
phenol  1n  blueglll, L.  macrochlrus.   One  group  of  10  fish  was exposed  to
each  nominal  concentration  under   static  conditions at  22°C.    The  24-  and
96-hour  LCcQ  values  were  7.2  and  6.6  mg/l, respectively.  Lammerlng  and
Burbank  (1961),  also working  on blueglll,  L. macrochlrus. reported  24-  and
48-hour  LCgo  values  of  8.2  and  8.1   mg/l,   respectively, based on  static
tests  (water  renewed after  24  hours)  conducted   on  groups of  10  fish  per
concentration at   20*C.   Phlpps et al.  (1981)  performed both  static  and
flowthrough tests  of  the toxldty  of  2-chlorophenol  to  fathead  minnows,  P.
promelas.   In  the  static   test,   fish  were  exposed  1n  groups of  20  to
different  concentrations  of the chemical  at  21.6-25.4*C.  The  48-hour  LC5Q
was  9.7  mg/l.  In  the  flowthrough tests, 100  fish  (two groups  of 50)  were
exposed  to each measured concentration at  25'C.   The  96- and  192-hour  LCrQ
values  were  12  and  6.3  mg/l,  respectively.   Kobayashl  et  al.   (1979)
0220d                               -15-                             09/18/89

-------
reported  a  24-hour LC5Q  of 16  ppm (mg/i)  In  goldfish,  Carasslus  auratus.
In  a  static  renewal test conducted  at  20°C using  10  fish at each  exposure
concentration.  Konemann  and Husch  (1981) conducted  static  acute  toxldty
tests  on  gupples,  Poecllla retlculata.   Eight  fish  were   tested  at  each
concentration;  the  tests were  conducted  at  22°C  for  7-14  days.   The  LC5fl
decreased  from 13.46  mg/i   at  pH  7.8-11.2  mg/i  at  pH  7.3 and 7.06  mg/i
at pH  6.1, suggesting  that  the toxldty of 2-chlorophenol was  Influenced  by
pH  In  this study.   In a screening-type  study  conducted  on  two members  of
three  different  fish  species,  Applegate  et  al.  (1957)  found   that  24-hour
static  exposure  to  a  nominal  concentration, of  5   ppm  (mg/i)   of  2-chloro-
phenol at 13°C had  no  effect on  bluegllls  or  larval sea lampreys, Petromyzon
marlnus.   2-Chlorophenol  at this  exposure concentration  produced  death  In
rainbow trout, Salmo qalrdnerll.  after  13 hours.
4.1.2.   Chronic Effects on  Fauna.
    4.1.2.1.    TOXICITY —An early  life  stage  toxldty  test was  conducted
on  fathead minnows, £.  promelas.  by LeBlanc  (1983).   The eggs  (and  larvae
after  hatching)  were exposed under  flowthrough conditions to mean  measured
concentrations  of   0.78,  1.1,  1.7,  2.6  and   4.0   mg/i  of  2-chlorophenol.
Untreated and  solvent  controls  were also  Included.   Endpolnts  examined  were
percent hatch  of  eggs  and  percent  survival,  length and weight  of  larvae  at
30 days post-hatch.  No effects were reported at any concentration.
    4.1.2.2.    BIOACCUHJLATION/8IOCONCENTRATION — The      tendency      of
2-chlorophenol  to   bloconcentrate  In  fish was studied  by  Barrows et  al.
(1980).  A total of 100 blueglll sunflsh, L.. macrochlrus. were  exposed  to a
mean  measured  concentration  of  9.2   yg/i  of radlolabeled  2-chlorophenol
for  28  days  under  flowthrough  conditions.   A  7-day  depuration  period
followed.  The  equilibrium  BCF  measured at  28  days was  214.   The half-life

Q220d                               -16-                             08/09/89

-------
 for  elimination  of 2-chloropheno!  from the tissues  was  <1  day.  The  rela-
 tively  low BCF and  short  biological  half-life  Indicate  that  this compound Is
 not concentrated or retained significantly by blueglll.
 4.1.3.   Effects on Flora.
    4.1.3.1.    TOXICITY — Two  studies  have  Investigated  the  toxldty  of
 2-chlorophenol to  aquatic plants.   Static  96-hour  assays were  conducted by
 Shlgeoka et al.  (1988) on  two  species  of green algae, Selenastrum capricorn-
 11 turn  and  Chlorella  vulqaMs.  Test  algae  were exposed to five  nominal  con-
 centrations of  2-chlorophenol  at 21°C.  The EC5Q values  for  growth  inhibi-
 tion, calculated  from measurements  of  cell  density,  were 70  ppm  (mg/i)  for
 S.  capricornutum and  170  ppm  (mg/i)  for   C_.  vulgaris.  2-Chlorophenol  did
 not affect chlorophyll concentration or  oxygen  production  in  the green  alga,
 Chlorella  pyrenoidosa.  at  concentrations   of  <10 mg/i,  but  oxygen  produc-
 tion  was  reduced to  88%  of control  at 100 mg/i and  to  74% of  control  at
 500  mg/i   (Huang  and  Gloyna.   1968).   In  this  study, algal  cultures  were
exposed to nominal  concentrations  of  the  test  chemical  for  72  hours  under
 static conditions at 25°C.
    4.1.3.2.    BIOCONCENTRATION — Pertinent  data regarding  the  bioconcen-
 tration potential of  2-chlorophenol  in  aquatic  flora  were  not  located in the
available literature cited in Appendix A.
4.1.4.   Effects  on  Bacteria.   The effects  of  2-chlorophenol  on  bacteria
have been studied in  several different  ways.   The most  common assay  that has
 been done Is  the  Hlcrotox  test  on Photobacterium phosphoreum.  which  measures
 the  reduction  in light emitted from this  photolumlnescent  species following
 exposure  to   a  chemical.    EC5Q  values  reported  by various  authors  range
 from  14.7-40   mg/l  for  tests  lasting  5-30 minutes  (Bazin  et  al.,  1987;
 Cunningham et al., 1986;  Curtis et  al.,  1982;  Ribo and Kaiser, 1983).   A

0220d                               -17-                             08/09/89

-------
second  assay  Involved   quantifying  nitrification  activity  by Nltrobacter
(Wang  and  Reed,  1984).   Nitrite  utilization  was  reduced  25-27%  following
4-hour exposure  to  50 mg/l  of 2-chlorophenol.   Another  study examined  the
effect of  2-chlorophenol  exposure on ATP  content 1n both  the  heterotrophk
bacteria,  Escherlchla  coll.  and   the   nitrifying  bacteria,   NUrosomonas
eurooaea (Parker and  Prlbyl,  1984).   The effect was  greater  on N.  europaea;
following  20-m1nute  exposure, the  percent reduction  1n  ATP  Increased  from
24-32% as  the concentration  of  2-chlorophenol  Increased  from  100-400  mg/i.
The percent  reduction In ATP content  of  E_. coll  Increased from 6.5-23%  as
the   exposure   concentration   Increased   from  100-1000  mg/t.   One   study
evaluated  the  ability of 2-chlorophenol  to Inhibit  bacterial  dehydrogenase
activity  1n  a  mixed  bacterial culture  (Liu et  al., 1982).   The  EC-0  for
this effect was 700  mg/i.
4.2.   TERRESTRIAL TOXICOLOGY
4.2.1.   Effects  on  Fauna.   Only  one   study   regarding   the  effects  of
exposure of  terrestrial fauna  to  2-chlorophenol was located In the  available
literature.  Red-winged blackbirds trapped  1n the wild and  held 1n  captivity
for 2-6  before testing were  given  single doses  of  2-chlorophenol  by  gavage
1n  propylene  glycol  (Schafer  et  al.,  1983).    The  estimated   L05Q  for
2-chlorophenol In red-winged blackbirds was >113 rag/kg.
4.2.2.   Effects  on  Flora.   Pertinent   data   regarding  the  effects   of
exposure  of  terrestrial  flora to  2-chlorophenol  were  not  located  1n  the
available literature dted In Appendix A.
4.3.   FIELD STUDIES
    Pertinent  data   regarding the  effects  of  2-chlorophenol  on   flora  and
fauna  In the  field  were not  located  1n  the  available  literature dted  In
Appendix A.
0220d                               -18-                             09/18/89

-------
 4.4.   AQUATIC RISK ASSESSMENT
    The  lack  of  pertinent data regarding the  effects  of  exposure of aquatic
 fauna  and  flora  to 2-chlorophenol prevented the  development  of  a freshwater
 criterion  by  the  method  of  U.S.  EPA/OURS  (1986).  Available  data  are
 displayed  In  Figure  4-1.   Additional data required  for  the development of a
 freshwater  criterion  Include  the results of  acute assays with  a  salmonld
 fish  species, a  benthlc  crustacean,  an  Insect,  a  nonarthropod and  non-
 chordate  species   and  an  Insect  or  species  from a  phylum not  previously
 represented.   The  development  of a  freshwater  criterion  will  also  require
 data  from  an additional  chronic  toxldty  test  on  either  a   fish  or  an
 Invertebrate.
    Pertinent  data  regarding  the effects .of  exposure of  marine fauna  and
 flora  to 2-chlorophenol were  not  located  In  the available  literature.   Acute
 studies  with  representatives  from  eight  families  of marine  fauna and  at
 least  three chronic studies and  one  bloconcentratlon study  with  marine fauna
 and flora are needed to develop a saltwater criterion.
 4.5.   SUMMARY
    The  acute toxldty  of  2-chlorophenol   was   similar  In  all   species  of
 freshwater  fish  examined, with  LCrQ  values  ranging  from  6.6-10.0  mg/i  In
 the  blueglll,  L.   macrochlrus   (Buccafusco  et  al.,   1981;  Lammerlng  and
 Burbank,  1961;  Pickering  and  Henderson,  1966),  9.7-14.48  mg/i   In  the
 fathead  minnow, P_.  proroelas   (Phlpps  et al., 1981;  Pickering  and Henderson,
 1966),  12.37-16 mg/i In  the  goldfish, C.  auratus  (Kobayashl et  al.,  1979;
 Pickering  and  Henderson,  1966),  and 7.06-20.17  mg/i  1n  the  guppy,  P.
 retlculata  (Konemann and  Musch,  1981;  Pickering  and Henderson,  1966).   In a
 screening-type study,  5 mg/l  had no effect on  blueglll  or  sea  lamprey.  P..
marlnus.  but  produced  death  In  trout,  S.  ga1rdner11.  within  13  hours


 0220d                               -19-                             08/09/89

-------
TEST TYPE
Family
#1
Chordate (Salmonid-fish)
#2
Chordate (warmwater fish)
#3
Chordate (fish or amphibian)
14
Crustacean (planktonic)
#5
Crustacean (benthic)
#6
Insectan
#7
non-Arthropod/ -Chordate
18
New Insectan or phylum
representative
#9
Algae
#10
Vascular plant
GMAVa
(mg/L)
NA
8.1*
12*
4.6'
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
GMCVa
(mg/L)
NA
NA
*4«
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
709
NA
BCFa
NA
214C
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
     •NA.Not Available
     "Acute value for blueglll  sunflsh,  Leoomis  macrochlrus
     CBCF for blueglll sunflsh
     'LCio for fathead minnow,  Plmeohales promelas
     •Chronic value for fatnead minnow
     'Acute value for Daphnia maqna
     9EC>0 for growth Inhibition in Selenastrum caoricornutum
                                  FIGURE 4-1
    Organization Chart for Listing  GMAVs,  GMCVs,  and BCFs Required to Derive
Numerical Hater  Quality  Criteria by  the  Method of  U.S.  EPA/OHRS (1986) for
the Protection of Freshwater Aquatic Life from Exposure to 2-Chlorophenol
0220d                               -20-                             08/09/89

-------
(Applegate  et  al.,  1957).   Exposure  to concentrations <4  mg/l  for 30 days
had no  effect  on eggs and larvae of  fathead  minnows  In an early  life  stage
toxldty test  (LeBlanc,  1983).   The BCF determined In  blueglll was  214;  the
elimination  half.life was <1  day  (Barrows  et  al.,   1980).   Studies  using
freshwater  Invertebrates  revealed  that  toxic effects  occurred at  concentra-
tions   similar   to   those  found  for  fish.   LC5Q  and  Immobilization  EC5Q
values  In  Daphnla  ranged  from  2.6-23  mg/l  (Bazln et al., 1987;  Devlllers
and Chambon, 1986;  Keen and Balllod,  1985; Kn1e et al., 1983; Kopperman  et
al..  1974;  LeBlanc,  1980;  Randall  and Knopp,  1980;   Tlssot  et  al.,  1985;
Trabalka  and  Burch,   1978).   The  lethal   threshold   was   5.3  mg/l  In  the
shrimp,  C.  septemsplnosa.   the  only  saltwater  animal   studied.    Among
freshwater  algae.   EC5Q  values  for growth  Inhibition were  70 mg/l  In  S.
caprlcornutum.   and  170  mg/l  1n   C.   vulgarls  (Shlgeoka   et  al.,  1988).
Effects 1n  bacteria Included 50% reduction 1n  light   emitted  by P.  phospho-
reum at  14.7-40 mg/l  (Bazln et  al., 1987;  Cunningham et al., 1986;  Curtis
et al.,  1982;  Rlbo and  Kaiser,  1983),  25-27%  reduction  1n  nitrite utiliza-
tion  by  Nltrobacter   at  50  mg/l   (Wang   and  Reed,    1984),  decreased  ATP
content  In  E_.  coll  and  N.  europa  at 100-1000  mg/l  (Parker  and  Prlbyl,
1984)   and   50% reduction  In  bacterial  dehydrogenase  activity  In  a  mixed
bacterial  culture  at  700  mg/l.   Among  terrestrial   organisms,   the  oral
LDr  1n red-winged blackbirds was >113 mg/kg (Schafer  et al., 1983).
0220d                               -21-                             09/18/89

-------
                             5.  PHARNACOKINETICS
5.1.   ABSORPTION
    Delchmann  and  Kepllnger   (1981)  reported  that  the  chlorophenols  (not
specifically 2-chlorophenol)  are  absorbed readily  from  the gastrointestinal
tract  and   from  sites  of  parenteral  Injection.   Carpenter  et  al.  (1985)
reported that peak plasma  levels  of  radioactivity  were  reached 2  hours after
male rats  were treated  by gavage with  50 mg/kg  14C-labeled  2-chlorophenol
In  corn  oil  (plasma  levels  not  reported).   At  24  hours   after  treatment,
urinary radioactivity  accounted  for  91%  of  the administered  dose.   Only  4X
of  the  dose was recovered  In the feces  by  24 hours.  Spencer and  Hill lams
(1950)   administered  2-chlorophenol   emulsified  with  water  to   chinchilla
rabbits  (gender  not  specified)   and reported  that  101.IX  of the  dose  was
accounted for as  urinary metabolites.   The duration  of  the urine collection
period   was   not  reported.   Considered  together,  these  data   Indicate  that
absorption  of  2-chlorophenol  from the  gastrointestinal  tract 1s  rapid and
virtually complete.
    Roberts et al. (1977)  performed  an  Vn vitro study of the permeability of
human  epidermis   to  various  concentrations   of  phenolic  compounds.  A  2.5
cm2  portion of  the  epidermal layer  of  abdominal  skin obtained  at autopsy
was  supported  In  a  diffusion cell  and  exposed  to  reagent grade 2-chloro-
phenol   In   water.   2-Chlorophenol was  absorbed by   the  epidermal  membrane,
with  a  permeability  coefficient of   5.5lxlO~Vcm/m1nute   and  a  threshold
concentration for tissue damage of 0.8% (w/v).
    Permeation of  2-chlorophenol   1n saline  through  Intact  and denuded  skin
of hairless  SKH-hr-1 mice  (60-100 days  old)  was studied by Huq et al. (1986)
using ]£  vitro  diffusion cell methods.   The permeability  coefficients for
2-chlorophenol at  concentrations  of 0.05,  0.19  and 0.50  g/100  mi through
0220d                               -22-                             09/18/89

-------
whole   skin   were   107x10"*,   116x10"'   and   140xlO~Vcm/hour,   with   an
average  lag   times  of  21.9,  10.3  and  6.3  minutes,   respectively.    The
permeability   coefficients  of   2-chlorophenol   In   approximately   the   same
concentrations  through  skin  stripped of  the stratum corneum were  253xlO"3,
276xlO'3  and  214xlO"Vcm/hour,   with  lag  times  of  11.5,   5.5   and   8.5,
respectively.
5.2.   DISTRIBUTION
    Liver and  kidney  tissues  from weanling  female  Sprague-Oawley  rats  given
drinking water containing  2-chlorophenol  (97% pure)  for  10  weeks,  continuing
through  breeding,  gestation  and  3 weeks  postparturltlon were analyzed  for
2-chlorophenol content (Exon  and Holler,  1982).   Following  exposure  to  0, 5,
50  and  500  ppm,  respectively,   the  levels  In  livers   (from  three  pooled
                           '                                        •
samples/group) were 0.16,  2.20,  3.20  and 0.08 ppm;  the  levels  In  the kidney
(pooled  tissues  from  five  rats/group)  were  0.26,  2.60,  2.40 and  2.00 ppm.
The  lower   levels   In   the tissues  of  rats  given  higher  doses  were  not
explained.
    Significant amounts  of radioactivity were found  In  the gastrointestinal
tracts  and  the  fat   of  male  rats   treated  by  gavage  with  14C-labeled
2-chlorophenol  In   corn  oil  at   50  mg/kg,  but  levels  In  fat  decreased
markedly by  4  hours after treatment (Carpenter  et  al.,  1985).   The compound
was rapidly  excreted 1n  the urine  and  the feces, with little distribution to
other (unspecified) tissues.
    Radioactivity  from  radlolabeled  2-chlorophenol  (probably orally  admin-
istered, label not specified,  dose  not  reported)  bound to the  livers  and
kidneys of Gunn rats >3-4  times In Sprague-Oawley rats (Houser,  1983).
0220d                               -23-                             09/18/89

-------
5.3.   METABOLISM
    Following  oral  administration  of  2-chlorophenol  at  225  mg/kg  to male
Sprague-Oawley  rats,  the  compound  was  recovered In  the free  form 1n  the
urine, along with  the  glucuronlde and  glucuronlde and sulfate  conjugates  of
2-ch1orohydroqu1none (Houser,  1983).   After  pretreatment of  the rats with
B-naphthoflavone or  Arochlor  1254, the  proportion of metabolites  recovered
as   2-chlorohydroqu1none   derivatives    Increased  (percent   of  dose   not
reported).  In Gunn rats, oral administration of  300  mg/kg  of  2-chlorophenol
resulted  In  24-hour  recovery  of  the  compound  In   the  free  form,  as  the
glucuronlde and sulfate and as  the  sulfate  conjugate  of  2-chlorohydroqulnone
(percent of dose not reported),  In  the urine  (Houser,  1983).   2-Chlorohydro-
qulnone derivatives were formed 8-9 times more  1n Gunn rats  than .In  Sprague-
Oawley rats.
    In male  rats  treated  by  gavage with  50  mg/kg of  14C-labeled  2-chloro-
phenol  In  corn oil, 91% of  the dose of  radioactivity was recovered  In  the
urine, with a  small  amount appearing  In  the  feces  (Carpenter  et al..  1985).
More  than 90%  of the urinary  radioactivity  was  Identified as  glucuronlde  and
sulfate conjugates  of chlorophenol, with  <2% recovered as  parent compound.
    In chinchilla rabbits  (sex  not reported)  given 171.3 mg/kg of  2-chloro-
phenol emulsified  with  water  by  stomach  tube (Spencer and Williams,  1950),
82.4% of  the dose consisted of  glucuronldes,  and  18.7% consisted of  ethereal
sulphates of 2-chlorophenol.  No  mercaptuMc  add was formed.   Collectively,
these   data   Indicate   that  2-chlorophenol   Is  rapidly  and  extensively
metabolized.
5.4.   EXCRETION
    The  most  meaningful excretion  data  were provided by  Carpenter  et  al.
(1985), who  reported  that  rats  treated  by gavage with  50  mg/kg 14C-labeled
0220d                               -24-                             08/09/89

-------
2-chlorophenol excreted 91X of  the  dose  of  radioactivity  In  the  urine and  4%
In  the feces  within  24  hours  after  dosing  (Carpenter et  al., 1985).   In
chinchilla  rabbits  treated  with 171.3  mg/kg of  2-chlorophenol by  stomach
tube,  101.IX  of  the dose was recovered  as  metabolites  In  the urine (Spencer
and  Williams,  1950).  The duration  of  the urine  collection period  was  not
specified.
5.5.   SUMMARY
    Chlorophenols   (as   a   class)   are    readily    absorbed    from   the
gastrointestinal tract and from parenteral  sites  of  Injection (Delchmann  and
KepHnger,  1981).   Orally administered 2'rChlorophenol appears to  be  rapidly
and  almost  completely  absorbed  from the  gastrointestinal  tracts  of  rats
(Carpenter  et  al.,  1985; Houser, 1983)  and chinchilla rabbits  (Spencer  and
Williams,    1950).    In   j_n   vitro   studies   using   human  autopsy  skin,
2-chlorophenol was  absorbed  by the  epidermal membrane with a  permeability
coefficient  of 5.51xlO~Vcm/m1n  (Roberts  et al.,  1977).
    Following  oral  administration  of 2-chlorophenol   to  rats,   the compound
was  found  In   the  liver  and  kidney  (Exon  and Koller,  1982), but  metabolism
and excretion  occurred so rapidly that there  was  little distribution  to body
tissues (Carpenter et al., 1985).   Urinary  excretion  accounted  for  91X of  an
oral  dose   In  rats  within 24 hours  of  treatment  (Carpenter et al.,  1985).
Over  90%  of   the  urinary excretion  consisted  of glucuronlde  and  sulfate
conjugates  of  the  parent compound,  and  <2% consisted  of  unchanged parent
compound  (Carpenter et  al., 1985).   Other  metabolites  Identified   1n  the
urine  of   treated  rats   Include   glucuronlde   and   sulfate  conjugates   of
2-chlorohydroqulnone (Houser, 1983),  an  oxidation product  of 2-chlorophenol.
Glucuronlde and  ethereal suflate conjugates  of  2-chlorophenol   In  the urine
of orally treated chinchilla  rabbits  accounted for virtually 100X  of  an oral
dose (Spencer and Williams, 1950).
0220d                               -25-                             11/01/89

-------
                                 6.  EFFECTS
6.1.   SYSTEMIC TOXICITY
6.1.1.   Inhalation Exposure.
    6.1.1.1.   SUBCHRONIC ~ Pertinent    data    regarding   toxlclty    from
subchronlc  Inhalation  exposure  to 2-chloropheno!  were not  located 1n  the
available literature dted In Appendix  A.
    6.1.1.2.   CHRONIC — Pertinent  data  regarding  toxlclty   from  chronic
Inhalation  exposure to  2-chlorophenol  were  not  located  In  the  available
literature dted In Appendix A.
6.1.2.   Oral Exposure.
    6.1.2.1.   SUBCHRONIC — In a  3-week oral  toxlclty study,  rats  (number,
strain  and   sex  not given  In  translation)  were given  65 or  130  mg/kg  of
2-chlorophenol  1n  olive  oil.   At  both treatment  levels, weight  gain  was
significantly  reduced,  and  liver  weights  were Increased  when  compared  with
controls.   By  the   third  week, there  were  significant depressions  1n  hemo-
globin  levels  and hematocrlt  values.  Hlstologlcal  examinations  revealed
degenerated  liver  tissue with congestion,  atrophy,  swelling,  vacuollzatlon,
dilation  of  rough endoplasmlc  retlculum  and  mltrochondrlal  swelling  and
destruction of mitochondria! cMstae (Chung, 1978).
    6.1.2.2.   CHRONIC — As  part  of  a cancer  study  (Sections   6.2.2.  and
6.2.3.),  Exon and  Koller  (1983b,  1985)  exposed  groups  of  24-32  male  and
24-28  female  Sprague-Oawley  rats  to 2-chlorophenol  (97X  pure)  1n  the drink-
Ing water at  levels of  0,  5, 50 and 500 ppm from weaning  to -2 years of age.
The dams  (groups of 12-20) of  these rats  had  been  given the  same treatments
from  3 weeks of age  through breeding  (to  untreated males) until  weaning of
their  progeny.  During  gestation days  14-21,  dams   also received  0.318%
0220d                               -26-                             09/18/89

-------
ethylurea  In  the  diet  and  1   ppm  nitrite  (precursors  of  the  carcinogen
ethylnltrosourea)  In  the  drinking  water.   A  negative  control  group  (not
exposed to any compounds)  received normal  food  and  water; a positive control
group  was  administered  just  ENU precursors.   Rats were checked  dally  for
morbidity;  moribund  or  tumor-bearing  animals  were  sacrificed,  and  all
tissues  were  examined  grossly  and  microscopically.   Body  weights  were
recorded monthly  for  all  rats, and  hematologlcal  parameters  were measured
every  2 months   or  every 2  weeks  (Exon  and Koller,  1983b) on  randomly
selected animals (five males,  five females) from each group.
    At  7  months, mean  body weights  of  female 'rats  In most .treated  groups
were  significantly  lower than those  of  controls,  and  the  mean body weights
of male rats were generally significantly  higher  than  those of  controls,  but
these  data  were  not  consistent  or   dose-related.   At 24  months,  Exon  and
Koller  (1985)   reported  that   treatment  with  2-chlorophenol  significantly
elevated RBC. PCV and  blood hemoglobin concentrations  In both  sexes of rats
In  the  500  ppm  group.   Noncancer   hlstopathologlc  observations   were  not
reported.
6.1.3.   Other  Relevant  Information.   All  chlorophenols  reportedly Irritate
the  skin  and eyes,  and the dusts  Irritate the respiratory  tract   (Frelter,
1981).  In humans,  2-chlorophenol Is  reportedly highly toxic,  causing severe
burns,  some  liver  and  kidney  damage, narcosis  and  respiratory  depression
(Davis et al.,  1959).
    Houser (1983) reported  that  a single oral  administration of 300 mg/kg of
2-chlorophenol   to  Gunn  rats  (sex  not reported)  resulted  In  centrllobular
hepatic  necrosis  In  50% of  the animals  and  renal necrosis  In 75X  of  the
animals.  A  dose  of 225 mg/kg In male  Sprague-Oawley  rats was  not  renal- or
hepatotoxlc.
0220d                               -27-                             09/18/89

-------
    Oelchmann  (1943)  reported  L050s  in rats  (strain  and  sex not specified)
of 670 mg/kg  from  an  orally administered dose and 950 mg/kg from a subcuta-
neous dose.   Oral  LOgQ values  of  670 mg/kg  for  the mouse  (strain and sex
not specified) and  440  mg/kg  for  the blue fox were reported (Bubnov et al.,
1969).
    The acute  oral LD5Qs,  administered  by  gavage  (98%  pure,  In  deIonized
water),  In 6-week-old male  and  female CD-I  ICR mice were 347 and 345 mg/kg,
respectively  (Borzelleca  et al.,  1985).   Signs of  toxkUy Included   rapid
respiration,  tremors   and   convulsions  leading  .to  central  nervous  system
depression.   In  other studies, Borzelleca  (1983)  found  the ED., for   motor
Impairment  In  CD-I mice to  be  63 mg/kg; maximum  effect  occurred 5 minutes
after  treatment   and  was   reversible.   The  lowest  dose  that   produced   a
behavioral change  In  the mice  was 1  mg/kg,  which resulted In  a change  1n
operant  behavior  after 2 days  of treatment.
    In a  14-day  behavioral  toxldty  study,  mice  (strain  and sex not speci-
fied) were gavaged  with  2-chlorophenol  In doses of 35, 69 and 175  mg/kg/day
and compared  to  an untreated  control  group.  There was 80%  mortality In the
group treated  with 175  mg/kg/day; mortality  1n  the control  group was not
reported.   The 175 mg/kg/day  group  also  showed  a  significant  decrease  In
body weight  before death.   HyperactlvHy was  seen  In the mice  treated with
35 and 69  mg/kg  from  the fourth day  of exposure until  treatment  was stopped
(Kailman et al.,  1982).
    Farquharson  et al.  (1958)  studied  the  toxldty  of  IntraperHoneally
administered  2-chlorophenol  In  fasted male  albino  rats.   The median lethal
dose  of  230 mg/kg, Injected  In 10  mt of  olive  oil/kg body weight, caused
excited behavior,  running  or  vigorous nose-rubbing,  followed wUhln minutes
0220d                               -28-                             09/18/89

-------
by tremors and convulsions.  Rats that recovered remained sluggish and hypo-
tonic  for  hours.   The  dose  also  produced  a   2°C   decrease   1n  rectal
temperature when compared with controls.
    IntrapeMtoneally administered 2-chlorophenol (dissolved  1n 0.9%  saline)
produced  clonlc  convulsions  In  50%  of  anesthetized  male  Sheffield albino
mice given 0.77 ymols/kg (-100 mg/kg).
    Subcutaneous LD5Qs  of 800 and  950  mg/kg were  reported for guinea  pigs
and  rabbits  (strain  and sex  not reported),  respectively  (ChMstensen and
Luglnbyhl, 1975).
6.2.   CARCIN06ENICITY
6.2.1.   Inhalation.   Pertinent   data  regarding  the  carclnogenldty   from
Inhalation  exposure  to  2-chlorophenol  were  not  located  1n  the  available
literature cited 1n Appendix A.
6.2.2.   Oral.    In  a  study of the  carc**gen1c-cocardnogen1c  potential of
2-chlorophenol.  Exon  and Koller  (19S3b.  1985)  exposed  groups of  24-32  male
and 24-28  female Sprague-Oawley  rats  pre-. post- or  pre- and postnatally  to
the compound mixed In the drinking water  In  concentrations of  0, 5. 50 and
500 ppm,  along  with prenatal  exposure to ENU.   ENU,  a  known  carcinogen, was
administered as  the precursors;  0.316% ethyl  urea  In food and 1  ppm sodium
nitrite  In  drinking  water.   In  addition,  a  group  of   rats  was  exposed
pre- and  postnatally  to 2-chlorophenol  without  prenatal exposure to ENU;  a
positive control group was treated with  ENU alone.
    Prenatal exposure  to  2-chlorophenol  consisted of  exposing  the  dams  to
the levels  1n  drinking water  described  above from  weaning  through mating  at
90 days of age and through  weaning  to postpartum day  21.  Postnatal  exposure
to 2-chlorophenol  consisted of  exposing  the test  animals  to the  levels  1n
drinking  water  described  above  at   weaning  for  24  months.   ENU was  also


0220d                               -29-                             09/18/89

-------
administered as  above,  with 3.18% ethylurea  In  the diet given  concurrently
with 1 ppm nitrite In the drinking water.
    In  the group  prenatally  exposed,  the  2-chlorophenol   did  not  produce
consistent effects  In survival  to  weaning.   According  to  the  authors,  the
weaning  weight  of  males  and  females  given 2-chlorophenol  was  generally
decreased  1n  comparison with  controls, but  the observation  was  not  dose-
dependent.  Body weights  of  females  remained  decreased  through  7  months,
whereas  male   rats   had  generally   Increased  body  weights  (p<.l).   These
differences were not observed after 24 months (Exon  and Koller,  1985).
    2-Chlorophenol  alone  did   not   Increase   the   Incidence  of  tumors,  or
decrease  the  t1me-to-tumor  after <24 months  of  exposure 1n comparison  with
controls.   Alternatively,   male  offspring   of   rats   treated  with  ENU  and
2-chlorophenol  at  all   treatment  levels,   both  pre- and  postnatally,  had
significantly   Increased  Incidence  of  tumors  when  compared  with the  group
given  only  ENU.   Male  progeny of rats  treated  with  ENU and  2-chlorophenol
given  prenatally at  5  and 500  ppm  (but   not  50  ppm).  and  with  ENU  and
2-chloro-  phenol  given postnatally at  5   ppm,   had  significantly  higher
Incidence  of  tumors  compared  with  the  ENU-treated group.   Tumor  Incidence
appeared  to  be  higher  In  the  lower  dose  groups,  and females  seemed  to  be
less  sensitive  to  ENU-lnduced  tumors.   Tumor   latency was   significantly
decreased  in  rats exposed  to  ENU with  both pre- and postnatal  exposure  to
2-chlorophenol  at  all   treatment  levels  when  compared with   the  ENU-only
group.   The  Investigators   suggested that 2-chlprophenol  may have  enhanced
the cardnogenlcHy of ENU (Table 6-1).
6.2.3.   Other Relevant  Information.   Boutwell  and  Bosch (1959)  conducted a
study  of  the   tumor-promoting  ability of  2-chlorophenol applied dermally  to
2- to 3-month-old female albino  Sutter  mice.   When  applied  as  a 20% solution

0220d                                -30-                             04/17/90

-------
                                                        Table 6-1



                                  Incidence of Tumors In Sprague-Dawley Rats Dosed With
o £-LM iui upiieuu i diiu/ui tiuyiuicd diiu niirdie tcwuj-
ro
ro
o
Treatment**
(ppm)
Control
Pre- and Postnatal (No. EUN)
5
50
500
EUN Only
Prenatal «• EUN
5
50
^ 500
Postnatal * EUN
5
50
500
Pre- and Postnatal * EUN
5
50
500
Days
Hean
422

422
420
421
302

282
268
276

282
325
300

245
256
259
to Tumor
1 SE
± *o

t 60
• 59
± 61
± I*

» 15
» 17
± 17

* 15
» 17
i 22

t 14C

I 14'
lumor
lotal
3d

2d
4d
5d
58

69
63
57

7/d
54
33d

85d
63
68
Incidence (%)
Hale
7d

4d
4d
4d
54

75d
50
75d

83d
63
39

92d
85d
77d
F ema 1 e
Od

Od
4d
7d
63

63
75
39d

71
46
25d

79
50
60
No. Rats/Group
Hale
30

24
24
28
28

24
24
28

24
24
28

24
24
30
Female
30

24
24
28
24

24
24
28

24
24
24

24
24
30
      a From:  Exon and Koller, 1983b



      D 2-Chlorophenol was administered  In the drinking water.  Prenatal administration was done by dosing

5       dams  from weaning through parturition or postnatally from weaning (21 Days).  ENU was administered

^       as ethylurea  1n the  feed (3.18X) and 1-ppm nitrate to the water.
««j
^.

o     c £.10  compared to ENU positive control by analysis of variance (lease-square means).



      d p<.10 compared to ENU positive control by chl-square test.

-------
 In  dloxane  to the backs  of  the uninitiated mice twice weekly  for  12  weeks,
 28/30  mice  survived;   46%  of  these  mice  developed  paplllomas,  but  none
 developed  carcinomas.    A  dloxane-treated  vehicle  control  group  was  not
 reported.   When  applied  twice weekly  for  15  weeks  as  a  20%  solution  In
 benzene  following  Initiation  with  0.3% OMBA In benzene,  31/35  mice survived
 compared   with  15/20   similarly   Initiated   vehicle   control   mice.    A
 benzene-treated  vehicle  control group was  not  reported.   Of  the survivors,
 61%  had  paplllomas,  compared  with  7% of  the  controls;   10%  had  carcinomas,
 whlle-inone were seen In the controls (Table 6-2).
 6.3.  '  MUTAGENICITY
    In  a  modification  of  the  prelncubatlon   procedure  of  the  Salmonella
 assay, concentrations  of 10-1000  yg/plate  of  reagent grade  2-chlorophenol
 dissolved   1n  dimethylsulfoxide   (control   plate  was  solvent  only)  were
 negative  when tested  1n  strains  TA100,  TA1535, TA1537  and  TA98,  with  and
without S-9 metabolic activation (Haworth et al., 1983).
    Acute  oral  doses of  75-300 mg/kg  1n  CO-1  mice  did not  Induce  SCE  or
affect DNA synthesis (Borzelleca, 1983).
    Oral   administration  of  130 mg/kg  of  2-chlorophenol to  Sprague-Oawley
 rats  every  other  day for 1  week  resulted  In a 5-fold Increase 1n chromatld
 deletions 1n  bone marrow  cells  (Chung,  1978).   After exposures  of 2-3 weeks,
 there was complete Inhibition of mitosis 1n the cells.
 6.4.     DEVELOPMENTAL TOXICITY
    Pertinent  data  regarding  the  teratogenldty  of   2-chlorophenol  from
 either  oral  or   Inhalation  exposure  were not  located In   the  available
 literature cited In Appendix A.
0220(1                               -32-                             04/17/90

-------
                                   Table 6-2

          The Incidence of Tumors 1n Initiated and Uninitiated  Mice
                         Treated WHh 2-Chlorophenold
       Treatment
     No.  Mice
(Survivors/Treated)
No. with
paplllomas
No. with
carcinomas
Control (No treatment)

No Initiator;
20% chlorophenol
1n'da1oxane&

3% OMBA In benzene;
20% chlorophenol In
benzene^
     25/25
     28/30
     31/35
13 (46%)
19
 3 (10%)
aFrom:  Boutwell and Bosch (1959)

''Benzene and dloxane vehicle control groups were not reported

cp>.05 compared with uninitiated mice by Fisher Exact Test
0220d
          -33-
                  04/20/90

-------
6.5.     OTHER REPRODUCTIVE EFFECTS
    Exon and  Roller  (1982, 1983b,  1985)  performed  several studies  In  which
reproductive  parameters  were  measured In  groups of  12-20  female  Sprague-
Oawley  rats  exposed  to  2-chlorophenol (97-98%  pure)  In  drinking  water  at
concentrations of  0,  5,  50  and  500  ppm.  In all  cases,   dams  were exposed
from 3  weeks  of  age through breeding  at  90  days  (to untreated males);  expo-
sure continued  until  3  weeks  postparturItlon.   Untreated  negative  controls
were   also   Included.    Reproductive   parameters  evaluated   were   percent
conception,  Utter  size,  number  of stillbirths,  birth and  weaning weights
                                                            --t
and survival  to  weaning.   Records of  body weights and  hematologlc data were
taken on the pups at weaning.
    Results  Indicated that  percent conception  was   greater  In all  treated
groups  (9/12,  9/12,  12/14 for  5,  50  and  500 ppm  treated  groups,  respec-
tively)  than  1n  the untreated  control group  (8/12), but  these results were
not  statistically  significant.   Utter   sizes   (live   and  stillborn)  were
significantly decreased  and  percent of stillbirths  was  significantly greater
in  the  dams  given 500 ppm 2-chlorophenol.   Birth weights  (live pups only),
body weights  at  weaning  and  survival to  weaning  (exclusive  of  stillborn
pups)  were  not  affected  by  the  treatment.   Body weight  gains of  the dams
also   were  not   affected.     There   were   no   statistically   significant
treatment-related effects  on hematologlc  parameters.   No  effects were seen
at <50 ppm.
    In  addition, Exon  and  Koller  (1985)  studied  the  Immune function  In
another  group of  pups  whose  exposure  was continued  postnatally.  These pups
were  weaned  at  3  weeks; exposure to 2-chlorophenol  was  continued  for  a
subsequent  12-15  weeks.   The   1mmunolog1cal  status  of  each  animal  was
evaluated  by  testing  Us  ability  to elicit  three major  types  of  Immune
0220d                               -34-                             04/17/90

-------
 responses    (humoral   Immunity,   cell-mediated   Immunity   and   macrophage
 function).   Each Immune  function  test was  performed  on four male  and four
 female  offspring from each treatment group.  Body,  liver,  spleen and thymus
 weights were also recorded at the  time of sacrifice.
    Rats  treated with  the 2-chlorophenol  did  not  respond  differently than
 their  corresponding controls  In  any  of  the  Immune functions  evaluated  In
 these   Investigations.    None   of   the  treatment  groups  demonstrated  any
 statistically  significant alterations  In  either whole  body or  individual
 organ weights.
 6.6.     SUMMARY
    No  Information  was  located concerning  the  subchronlc  or  chronic Inhala-
 tion toxlclty of 2-chlorophenol.
    In  rats  dosed  by  gavage  with  2-chlorophenol  at 65  or  130  mg/kg  for  3
weeks,  there were  reductions  1n weight gains and Increases  1n liver weights
when  compared  with  controls  (Chung,  1978).   Hematologlcal  effects  and
hepatic degeneration were also noted at both treatment levels.
    In reports of a  subchronlc  drinking water  study (Exon and Koller, 1983a,
1985) 1n which rats  were  exposed  to 2-chlorophenol pre-, post-,  and pre- and
postnatally  through  the  dams  and  then In  the  drinking  water  at  levels  of 0,
5,  50  and  500 ppm  for  <15 weeks,  no  Immunological  effects  were observed at
any level.
    In a chronic drinking water study (Exon and  Koller, 1985) In which rats
were exposed to  2-chlorophenol  prenatally  through their  dams  and then In the
drinking water at  levels  of 0,  5, 50 and  500.' ppm  for  <2 years, hemoglobin
levels.  RBC  counts  and  PCV  were all  significantly  higher  1n  the  groups
exposed to 500 ppm than In controls.
    Chlorophenols  reportedly   Irritate the skin  and  eyes,  and the  dusts
Irritate the  respiratory  tract  (Frelter,   1981).   In  humans, 2-chlorophenol

0220d                               -35-                             04/17/90

-------
causes  severe  burns,  liver  and  kidney  damage,  narcosis  and  respiratory
depression (Davis et al., 1959).
    Oral  LOrgS  of  670,  346-670  and  440  mg/kg  have  been  reported  for the
rat (Oelchmann, 1943), the mouse (Borzelleca et  al.,  1985;  Bubnov. 1969) and
the blue  fox  (Bubnov,  1969),  respectively.   A single oral  dose of 300  mg/kg
caused  kidney and  liver damage  1n Gunn  rats,  which  appeared to  be more
sensitive to  the  compound  than  Sprague-Oawley  rats (Houser, 1983).  An oral
dose of  63 mg/ky  caused  motor Impairment  In CD-I mice within 5 minutes, and
a  dose  of  1  mg/kg produced  behavioral  change  after   2  days   (Borzelleca,
1983).  A gavaged  dose of  175 mg/kg resulted In 80%  mortality 1n mice, with
a statistically significant weight  loss before death; hyperactlvUy was seen
at  lower  doses   (Kallman   et   al.,   1982).    In  rats,   a  median   lethal
Intraperltoneal dose  of  230 mg/kg  caused  excited  behavior and  convulsions,
with a decrease In body temperature (Farquharson  et al..  1958).
    No  Information  on   cardnogenldty  of  2-chlorophenol  from  Inhalation
exposures could  be  located.  A carc1nogen1dty-cocarc1nogen1c1ty  drinking
water   study  (Exon  and  Koller,  1985) In which rats were  exposed  to 2-chloro-
phenol  hi utero and  then  In drinking water at  concentrations  <500  ppm was
negative  for  cardnogenldty  after  2  years  of exposure.   In  the same  study,
2-chlorophenol  appeared  to  promote  the  cardnogenldty  of ENU,  Increasing
the tumor Incidence and  decreasing the t1me-to-tumor 1n male rats.   Dermal
application   of  2-chlorophenol   following  Initiation by  OMBA  promoted  the
formation of skin tumors  1n mice  (Boutwell  and  Bosch.  1959).
    Up  to 1000  yg/plate  2-chlorophenol  was -negative   for mutagenldty  1n
four  strains  of Salmonella  typhlmuMum. with  and  without  metabolic  activa-
tion (Haworth et al., 1983).  It did  not  Induce  SCEs  or affect  DNA synthesis
In  mice dosed  with 75-300  mg/kg  (Borzelleca,  1983).   Chromatld deletions

0220d                                -36-                              04/17/90

-------
were  reported  In rat bone  marrow cells from treatment with  130  mg/kg  every
other day for 1 week (Chung, 1978).
    No  Information  on the  teratogenlclty  of  2-chlorophenol  could  be located.
Reproductive  effects were  reported  1n  rats  exposed  to  2-chlorophenol  1n
drinking water from weaning through  breeding  and  lactation  (Exon  and Koller,
1982; 1985).   Reduced  Utter  sizes and Increased number  of stillbirths were
seen  1n  rats  exposed to 500 ppm  2-chlorophenol;  these effects  were not seen
at <50 ppm.
0220d                               -37-                             04/17/90

-------
                     7.  EXISTING GUIDELINES AND STANDARDS
7.1.   HUMAN
    A  verified  RfO  for 2-chlorophenol  of 0.005  mg/kg/day  (U.S. EPA,  1988)
was  based  upon reproductive  effects  In  the rat  study by  Exon and  Koller
(1982).
    The U.S.  EPA  (1980b)  established  an  ambient  water quality  criterion  of
0.1  yg/l  for  2-chlorophenol,  based  upon organoleptk  data  from  a  report
by  01etz  and  Traud  (1978).   WHO  (1984)  suggested  a  maximum  level  of  1
ug/l  for  2-chlorophenol  In  drinking water  based  on organoleptk  consid-
erations.
    A  DUEL  of 0.175 mg/l was  determined by  the  U.S.  EPA (1986b), based  on
the subchronlc rat reproduction study by Exon and Koller (1982).
7.2.   AQUATIC
    Guidelines  and  standards  for  the  protection  of  aquatic  life  from
exposure  to  2-chlorophenol  were  not  located  In  the available  literature
cited  1n Appendix A.
0220d                               -38-                             05/03/90

-------
                              8.  RISK ASSESSMENT
 8.1.   CARCINOGENICITY
 8.1.1.    Inhalation.    Pertinent  data  regarding   the   cardnogenlclty   of
 2-chlorophenol   to  animals  or  humans  from  Inhalation  exposure  were  not
 located In the  available  literature  cited  1n Appendix A.
 8.1.2.    Oral.    Exon  and  Roller  (1985)   reported  negative  results  In  a
 cardnogenlclty study of  2-chlorophenol  1n Sprague-Dawley  rats.   Rats were
 exposed  to  the compound  ^n  utero  through  lactation,  and  then  In drinking
 water,  at concentrations  of 0,  5,  50'or 500 ppm  for <24 months.
                                     •*
     In  the same study (Exon and KolVer, 1985),  the ability of 2-chlorophenol
 to potentiate the cardnogenlclty of  ENU,  a  known  carcinogen, was examined.
 Rat  dams  were exposed to precursors of ENU during gestation.  Offspring were
 exposed  to  2-chlorophenol  prenatally  through  the  dams,  postnatally  1n  the
 drinking   water  or  both.   In  all  groups  of  2-chlorophenol-exposed  males.
 tumor   Incidence  Increased and  time-to-tumor  decreased  when  compared with
 rats exposed  only to  ENU.
 8.1.3.    Other  Routes.  Boutwell and  Bosch (1959)  found  that dermal  appli-
 cation  of 2-chlorophenol  to  mice following Initiation  by  DM8A  promoted  the
 formation of  skin tumors.
 8.1.4.    Weight of  Evidence.   The  only  available  cardnogenlclty  study of
 2-chlorophenol  Is a  negative  drinking water study In which rats were exposed
 pre-,  post- or  both  pre- and postnatally; exposure was  continued  through  2
'years   with  drinking  water  containing 2-chlorophenol  <500  ppm  (Exon  and
 Roller. 1985).
     The  U.S.  EPA (1987)  recommended  that  2-chlorophenol be classified In
 U.S. EPA Group  0   (U.S.  EPA,   1986d)  (I.e..  cannot  be  classified  as  to
 cardnogenlclty In  humans).   More  recent  data  were not  located  that would
 change  this  assessment.

 0220d                                -39-                             05/03/90

-------
8.1.5.   Quantitative Risk Estimates.
    8.1.5.1.   INHALATION — Lack of  data precludes  estimation of  carcino-
genic potency from Inhalation exposure to 2-chlorophenol.
    8.1.5.2.   ORAL -- The   only   cardnogenlclty  data   located   regarding
2-chlorophenol were  the  negative  drinking water  studies  1n  rats  by Exon and
Roller  (1983b,  1985).    The  carcinogenic   potency   from oral  exposure  to
2-chlorophenol cannot be quantitatively estimated.
8.2.   SYSTEMIC TOXICITY
    The designation  "Rec."  In  the following sections refers  to data records
compiled 1n  Section  C.2.  of Appendix C  for  the generation of dose/duration-
response graphs.
8.2.1.   Inhalation Exposure.
    8.2.1.1.   LESS  THAN  LIFETIME  (SUBCHRONIC) — Pertinent data  regarding
the subchronlc  Inhalation toxlclty of  2-chlorophenol  were not located 1n the
available  literature  cited   1n  Appendix  A;   therefore,  derivation  of  an RfO
for subchronlc Inhalation exposure Is not possible.
    8.2.1.2.   CHRONIC — Pertinent  data  regarding  subchronlc  or  chronic
Inhalation  toxlclty   of  2-chlorophenol  were  not located  In  the  available
literature dted  1n  Appendix A; therefore,  derivation  of an RfD for chronic
Inhalation exposure 1s not possible.
8.2.2.   Oral Exposure.
    8.2.2.1.   LESS  THAN  LIFETIME  (SUBCHRONIC) — Data  from  sufficiently
comprehensive  subchronlc  oral  studies  of  2-chlorophenol In which adequate
parameters  of  toxlclty  were  measured  were  not  available.  Chung  (1978)
reported  decreased  weight   gain,  liver and   hematologlc   effects   In  rats
treated by gavage at 65 or 130 mg/kg/day  for  3 weeks.   No  1mmunolog1ca1
0220d                               -40-                             04/17/90

-------
effects  were found  In  rats  exposed both  pre- and postnatally to  2-chloro-
phenol  In  the  drinking  water at levels <500  ppm  (NOEL)  (Rec.  #11}  for  12-15
weeks  (Exon and  Koller,  1983a, 1985).   In  a  reproductive study.  Exon  and
Koller  (1982)  found  a  decrease In  litter  sizes  and  an Increase  In  still-
births  in   rats  given drinking  water  containing  500  ppm  of  2-chlorophenol
(Rec. #2)  from  3 weeks  of age  through  breeding and lactation. These effects
were not observed at  the next lower dose of 50 ppm, a NOAEL (Rec.  #1).
    The  reproductive NOAEL of  50  ppm was  used to  derive  a  chronic RfD  of
0.005 mg/kg/day  or  0.4  mg/day for  a 70 kg  human  (U.S.  EPA, 1986b).   Because
the  subchronlc   toxldty   data   base  for   2-chlorophenol was  judged  to  be
Inadequate  to calculate an RfD, the chronic  oral  RfO  (Section 8.2.2.2.)  was
adopted  as  the   subchronlc  oral  RfO   (U.S.  EPA,  1987).   As discussed  In
Section 8.2.2.2., confidence In  the key study, data base and the RfD are low.
    8.2.2.2.   CHRONIC — Exon   and   Koller   (1985)   reported   hematologlc
effects 1H  rats  provided drinking  water containing 2-chlorophenol  at 500 ppm
(LOAEL)  (Rec. #3)  for <24 months.   These effects were  not  observed In rats
exposed  to  50  ppm  (NOAEL)  (Rec. #4).  Although  the protocol stated that  a
complete hlstopathologlcal examination  was  performed,  noncancer  results were
not  presented.   In  studies  by  Exon  and   Koller   (1982,  1985),  reproductive
effects  were noted   In  female  rats  exposed  to   500  ppm  2-chlorophenol  In
drinking water  from  3  weeks  of age  through breeding  and  parturition  (Rec.
#2).  These effects  were  not  seen In  rats  exposed  to 50  ppm (NOAEL)  (Rec.
#1).  The data from  the 1982  study were used by the Office of Drinking  Water
as  the  basis for  an oral RfO  (U.S.  EPA,  198&b).  Based  on  the  assumption
that a  rat  drinks the equivalent  of  10%  of  Us body weight  In water  dally,
500 ppm  was transformed to an  estimated  dosage of 50  mg/kg/day (LOAEL),  and
50  ppm  to  5  mg/kg/day  (NOAEL).   A  verified  RfO of  0.005 mg/kg/day  was

0220d                               -41-                             04/17/90

-------
derived using an  uncertainty  factor  of 1000 (10  for  Interspecles  extrapola-
tion,  10  to protect unusually  sensitive  individuals  and 10 for use  of  data
from a  subchronlc  study).   The assumption  that  rats  drink water  equivalent
to  10% of  their weight  dally  differs  from the  suggested  water  consumption
guidelines  for   rats   (U.S.  EPA,  1986c)   where   water  consumption  =  0.049
l/day with  a  reference body weight  of 0.35 kg.  These  factors would result
1n a transformation of the NOAEL of 50 ppm to 7 mg/kg/day.
    U.S. EPA  (1988) considered  confidence In the key study low because  only
reproductive and  hematological  endpolnts  were evaluated.   Confidence  In the
data base  is  low because  no  other adequate subchronlc, chronic  or  develop-
mental   toxldty data were  available.   Confidence In the RfO was  low because
of low confidence In the key study and data base.
    Confidence  In  the  RfO 1s further  eroded by  reports of altered  behavior
In mice treated  with  2-chlorophenol  by gavage.   In a  14-day  exposure study,
Kallman et  al.  (1982)  reported hyperactlvlty  In mice treated with  35  or  69
mg/kg/day from  day  4  until  treatment  was terminated.  Because 35 mg/kg/day
was the lowest  level tested, a  NOAEL  for  this  effect  was not determined.  In
another study from  this laboratory,  Borzelleca  (1983)  reported  that  63 mg/kg
administered  as a  single  dose was  the  ED.-   for motor   Impairment,  which
peaked  In  Intensity at 5  minutes after  treatment.   Alterations  In  operant
behavior  occurred  after   as  few  as  two gavage  doses  >1 mg/kg/day.   The
testing  protocol   was  not  presented,  however,  and   these data  cannot  be
adequately evaluated.
0220d                               -42-                             05/03/90

-------
                           9.   REPORTABLE QUANTITIES
9.1.   BASED ON SYSTEMIC TOXICITY
    The U.S. EPA  (1983) determined  that  the  toxlclty  data  for  2-chlorophenol
were  Inadequate  for  deriving  an RQ.  However, more recent  data  on  reproduc-
tive  effects  In  rats (Exon and Koller, 1982) were deemed  appropriate  for  RQ
derivation  (U.S.  EPA.  1987).   The RQ  was  derived  from a  dose  of 500  ppm
2-chlorophenol  In  drinking water  provided  to rat dams  from 3 weeks  of  age
through  lactation,   which  resulted  In  significantly  reduced  Utter  sizes.
The equivalent  human dose  was  12 mg/kg/day, based on  a  dally  water  consump-
tion  conversion factor  of 0.049  I/day for  rats (U.S.  EPA,  1986c)  and  a
transformed animal dose of 70  mg/kg/day.   Multiplying the  human  body  weight
of 70 kg  by the  transformed human  dose  results  1n a  human  MED  of  840 mg/day,
which corresponds  to  an  RV   of  1.1.   With  an  RV   of  8  for the  observed
fetotoxldty,  a  CS   of  9  was   derived,  which corresponds  to  an  RQ  of  1000.
More recent toxldty data  for  2-chlorophenol were not  located, and  the RQ of
1000 previously derived by U.S. EPA (1987)  1s presented In  Table  9-1.
9.2.   BASED ON CARCINOGENICITY
    As reviewed  In  Chapter  6, cardnogenldty  data  for  2-chlorophenol  are
limited to  the negative  drinking  water studies  In  rats  by Exon and  Koller
(1983b,   1985).    The  U.S.  EPA  (1987)   recommended   that  2-chlorophenol   be
classified  In  U.S.   EPA   Group 0  (U.S.  EPA,   1986d)   —  I.e.,  cannot   be
classified as  to cardnogenldty 1n humans.  Since potency  factors  cannot  be
derived for the chemical,  a hazard  ranking based on  cardnogenldty  Is  not
possible for this compound.
0220d                               -43-                             05/03/90

-------
                                  TABLE 9-1
                                2-Chlorophenol
          Minimum Effective Dose (MEO) and Reportable Quantity (RQ)
Route:                  oral  1n  drinking water
Spedes/sex:             rat/female
Dose*:                  840 mg/day
Duration:               from  3 weeks  of age  through parturition
Effect:                 decreased  Utter size;  Increased number of
                        stillbirths
RVd:                     1.1
RVe:                     8
CS:                     9
RQ:                     1000
Reference:              Exon  and Koller, 1982

•Equivalent human dose
0220d                               -44-                            04/17/90

-------
                                10.   REFERENCES

Alexander,  M.  and  M.I.H.  Aleem.   1961.   Effect  of  chemical  structure  on
microblal  decomposition  of  aromatic  herbicides.  J.  Agrlc.  Food  Chem.   9:
44-47.

Applegate,  V.C.,  J.H.  Howell,  A.E.  Hall,  Jr.   and  M.A.   Smith.    1957.
Toxldty  of  4346 chemicals  to  larval  lampreys  and  fishes.   Spec.  Scl.  Rep.
Fish.  No. 207, Fish W1ldl. Serv.  USOI, Washington,  DC.  p.  1-157.
       ••i
Atkinson",  R.   1985.   Kinetics and mechanisms  of the gas-phase reactions  of
the  hydroxyl  radical  with  organic compounds  under  atmospheric  conditions.
Chem. Rev.  85: 69-201.

Balrd, R.B.,  C.L.  Kuo,  J.S.  Shapiro  and  W.A.  Yanko.   1974.   The  fate  of
phenollcs  In  uastewater-determlnatlon  by  direct-Injection  GLC and  warburg
resplrometry.  Arch. Environ. Contam.  Toxlcol.   2:  165-178.

Baker, M.D.  and  C.I. Mayfleld.  1980.   Microblal and  nonblologlcal decompo-
sition of  chlorophenols  and  phenols  In  soil.   Hater  Air Soil Pollut.   13:
411-424.

Baker, M.D., C.I.  Mayfleld and  W.E.  Innlss.  1980.   Degradation of  chloro-
phenol  1n soil,  sediment  and  water at  low  temperature.   Water   Res.   14:
1765-1771.
0220d                               -45-                             04/17/90

-------
Banerjee, S..  S.  Yalkowslcy and  S.C.  Valvanl.  1980.   Water  solubility and
octanol/water  partition  coefficients  of  organlcs.   Limitations  of  the
solubility-partition  cofflclent  correlation.   Environ.  Scl.  Technol.  14:
1227-1229.

Barrows, M.E., S.R. Petrocein, K.J. Macek and  J.J.  Carroll.   1980.   Blocon-
centratlon and elimination of  selected water  pollutants by  blueglll  sunflsh,
Lepomls macrochlrus.   Jju  Dynamics,  Exposure  and Hazard  Assessment  of  Toxic
Chemicals.  Ann Arbor  Science,  Ann  Arbor,  MI.   p.  379-392.

Battersby, N.S. and  V. Wilson.  1989.   Survey  of the  anaerobic  blodegrada-
tlon .potential  of  organic  chemicals  1n digesting  sludge.  Appl.  Environ.
Mlcroblol.  55: 433-439.

Bazln, C., P.  Chambon,  M.  Bonnefllle and G.  Larbalgt.  1987.   Comparison  of
the  sensitivity  of  a  test  using   the  luminescent  marine  bacteria  (Photo-
bacterium phosphoreum) and Oaphnla  bloassays.   Scl.  Eau.  6(4):  403-413.

Berbee,   R.P.M.    1986.   Chlorophenols   In   Industrial   wastewater   1n  the
Netherlands.   Environ. Contam.  Int. Conf.  2nd.  p. 141-143.

Borzelleca.   J.F.   1983.   A  review of  volatile  organic  contaminant  data.
Proc. AWWA Hater Qual. Technol. Corif.  p.  225-244.

Borzelleca,   J.F.,  J.R.  Hayes,  L.W.  Condle  and J.I. Egle,  Jr.   1985.   Acute
toxldty  of  monochlorophenols dlchlorophenols  and  pentachlorophenol  In  the
mouse.  Toxlcol. Lett.  p. 39-42.  (Amst).


0220d                               -46-                             04/17/90

-------
 Boule,  P.,  C.  Guyon  and  J.  Lemalre.   1982.   Photochemistry  a:nd environment -
 IV.   Photochemical  behavior  of  monochlorophenols  In dilute  aqueous solution.
 Chemosphere.   11: 1179-1188.

 Boule,  P.,  C.  Guyon and J.  Lemalre.   1984.   Photochemistry and environment.
 VI. Direct  phototransformatlon  of  chlorophenols  and Interactions with phenol
 on UV exposure In aqueous solution.  Toxlco Environ. Chem.  7: 97-110.

 Boule,  P.,  A.  Tlssot  and  J.  Lemalre.   1985.   Photochemistry and environment.
 XI. Orientation  rules of  photohydrolysls  of aromatic  chloride derivatives.
 Chemosphere.   14: 1789-1793.

 Boule,  P.,  C.  Guyon,  A.  Tlssot and J.  Lemalre.   1987.   Specific phototrans-
 formatlon of  xenoblotlc  compounds; chlorobenzenes  and  halophenols.   Ijv.  ACS
 Symp.  Ser.,  Washington, DC, R.G. Zlka and W.J. Copper, Ed.  327: 10-26.

 Bourquln, A.M. and  D.T.  Gibson.   1978.   Mlcroblal  degradation of halogenated
hydrocarbons.   Iin:   Hater  Chlorlnatlon  Environmental   Impacts  and  Health
 Effects.  Ann Arbor  Science, Ann Arbor, MI.  2:  253-264.

 Boutwell, R.K. and  O.K.  Bosch.   1959.  The  tumor-promoting  action  of phenol
and related compounds for mouse skin.   Cancer Res.   19:  413-427.

 Boyd,   S.A.   1982.   Adsorption  of  substituted; phenols   by  soil.   Soil  Sd.
 134: 337-343.
0220d                               -47-                             04/17/90

-------
Boyd,  S.A.,   O.R.  Shelton,  0.  Berry  and  J.M.  Tledje.    Y983.   Anaerobic
blodegradatlon  of  phenolic  compounds  In  digested sludge.   Appl.  Environ.
Mlcroblol.  46: 50-54.

Bubnov, W.O.,  F.N. Yaphizov  and  S.E.  Ogryzkov.   1969.  The  toxic properties
of activated o-chlorophenol for white mice and  blue foxes.   Tr.  Vses.  Naucho
Issled. Inst.  Vet. SanH.  EktoparazHol.   33:  258-263.  (Cited  In U.S.  EPA,
1986a)

Buccafusco,  R.J.,  S.J.  Ells  and  G.A.  LeBlanc.   1981.   Acute  toxldty  of
priority  pollutants  to  blueglll.   Bull.  Environ.  Contam.  Toxlcol.    26(4):
446-452.

Callahan,   M.A.. D.J.  Ehreth  and  P.L.   Levins.    1979.   Sources  of  toxic
pollutants found 1n  Influent  to  sewage  treatment plants.  Proc. Natl.  Conf.
Munlc. Sludge Manage.  8: 55-61.

Carlson,  R.M.  and  R.  Caples.   1975.   Organo-chemlcal Implications of  water
chloMnatlon.   I,n:  Water  Chlorination  Proc.  of  the   Conf.  In  the  Environ-
mental  Impact  of Water Chlorination,  Conf-751096.  Ann Arbor  Science  Publ.,
OakMdge.  TN, R.L.  Jolley, Ed.  10/22/24.   p.  73-83.

Carpenter, H.M., R.C.  Bender  and  D.R-. Buhler.   1985.   Absorption,  metabolism
and  excretion  of  2- and  4-chlorophenol   In  rats.   Toxlcologlst.   5:  109.
(Abstract)
0220d                               -48-                             04/17/90

-------
 Chemllne.   1989.   National  Library  of Medicine  Chemllne  Database.  Online
 2/23/89.

 ChMstensen, H.E.  and  T.T.  Luglnbyhl,  Ed.  1975.  Registry of Toxic  Effects
 of  Chemical  Substances.  U.S.  OHEW,  Rockvllle,  MO.   p. 861-862.   (CHed  In
 U.S. EPA, 1986a)

 Chung,  Y.   1978.   Inhibited  rat  growth.   Yakhak  Hoe  Ch1.  22(4):  175-192.
 (Cited  In Scoro, 1985)

 Cole,  R.H..-R.E.  Frederick. R.P. Healy and  R.G. Rolan.   1984.   Preliminary
 findings  of  the  priority  pollutant  monitoring  project  of  the  Nationwide
 Urban'Runoff Program.  J. Water Pollut.  Control  Fed.   56: 898-908.

Crockett. P.H.,  B.  Klllan,  K.S.  Crump  and  R.8.  Howe.    1985.   Descriptive
Methods  for Using  Data  from Dlsslmlllar  Experiments  to  Locate a  No-Adverse-
Toxic Effects Region In  the  Dose-Ouratlon  Plane.   Prepared by  K.S.  Crump  and
Co.,  Inc.,   under   Contract  No.  6807-007  for  Environmental   Criteria  and
Assessment Office,  U.S. EPA, Cincinnati!,  OH.

Cunningham,  V.L.,  M.S.  Morgan  and  R.E.  Hannah.  1986.   Effect  of  natural
water source on the  toxlclty  of chemicals  to aquatic microorganisms.  Aquat.
Toxlcol. Environ.  Fate.  9:  436-449.

Curtis,  C.,  A. Lima,  S.J.  Lozano and  G.O.  VeHh.  1982.  Evaluating  of  a
bacterial blolumlnescene  bloassay as  a method for predicting  acute  toxlclty
of organic chemicals to fish.  Aquat.  Toxlcol.  Hazard  Assess,   p.  170-179.
0220d                               -49-                             04/17/90

-------
Davis,  E.F.,  8.1. Tuma  and L.C.  Lee.   1959.  126.  Phenol',  o-chloro.  Ijv.
Handbook  of  Toxicology,  Volume  V:  Fungicides.   W.B.  Saunders  Co.,  Phila-
delphia and London,   p.  112-113.

Delchmann, H.   1943.   The  toxlclty  of  chlorophenols  for  rats.   Fed.  Proc.
Fed. Am. Soc.  Exp. Blol.   2: 76-77.

Delchmann,  H.B.  and  M.L.   Kepllnger.    1981.    Other  chlorophenols.   I_n:
Patty's  Industrial  Hygiene  and  Toxicology,  G.O.  Clayton  and F.E.  Clayton,
Ed.  Vol. 2A:  Toxicology.   John Wiley and  Sons,  NY.   p. 2612-2615.

Oevlllers,  J.   and   P.  Chambon.   1986.   Acute  toxldty  and  quantitative
structure-activity relationships  of  chlorophenols  on  Daphnla magna.   Bull.
Environ. Contam. Toxlcol.   37(4):  599-605.

D1etz,  F.  and  J.  Traud.   1978.   Geruchs- and  Gesehmacks-Schulellen-Konzen-
tratlonen  vou  Pheurelkoyreln  GasHasserfach.   Hasser-Abwasser.   119:  318.
(Ger.)  (Cited In U.S. EPA,  1980b)

Ourkin,  P.  and U.  Meylan.   1988.   User's  Guide  for  D2PLOT:  A Program  for
Dose/Duration  Graphs.   Prepared   by Chemical  Hazard  Assessment  Division,
Syracuse  Research Corporation  under Contract  No.   68-C8-0004  for  Environ-
mental Criteria and Assessment  Office, U.S.  EPA, Cincinnati, OH.

Elsenrelch, S.J.,  B.B.  Looney  and  J.D.  Thornton.   1981.  Airborne organic
contaminants  1n  the  Great  Lakes Ecosystem.   Environ.  Sd.  Technol.   15:
30-38.
0220d                               -50-                             04/17/90

-------
 Ellis,  O.D.,  C.M.  Jone,  R.A.  Larson  and  O.J.  Schaeffer.   1982.   Organic
 constituents  of  mutagenlc  secondary  effluents  from  wastewater  treatment
 plants.  Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxlcol.  11:  373-382.

 Exon,  J.H.  and L.O.  Keller.   1982.   Effects  of  transplacental  exposure  to
 chlorinated phenols.  Environ. Health Perspect.  46: 137-140.

 Exon,  J.H.   and  L.O.  Koller.   1983a.   Effects  of  chlorinated  phenols  on
 Immunity In rats.  Int. J. Immunopharmacol.   5(2): 131-136.

 Exon,  J.H.  and L.O.  Roller.   1983b.   Alteration  of  transplacental  carclno-
 genesls by  chlorinated  phenols.   Water Chlorlnatlon: Environ.  Impact  Health
 Eff.  4: 1177-1188.

 Exon, J.H.  and L.O.  Koller.   1985.   Toxldty  of 2-chlorophenol  2,4-d1chloro-
 phenol  and  2,4,6-trIchlorophenol.    hi:  Water  Chlorlnatlon,  R.L. Jolley  et
al.. Ed.   5: 307-330.

 Farquharson, M.E., J.C. Gage  and J.  Northover.  1958.   The biological  action
 of chlorophenols.  Br. J. Pharmacol.  13:  20-24.

 Frelter,  E.R.   1981.   Chlorophenols.   .In.:   K1rk-0thmer  Encyclopedia  of
Chemical Technology,  Vol.  3,  3rd ed.  Wiley  Intersdence,  New  York,  NY.   5:
864-872.

 Haller, H.D.   1978.   Degradation  of  mono-substituted  benzoates  and  phenols
by wastewater.  J. Water Pollut.  Control Fed.   50: 2771-2777.


0220d                               -51-                             04/17/90

-------
Hansch,  C.   and   A.J.   Leo.    1985.   HedChem  Project.   Pamona  College,
Claremont.  CA.  Issue #26.   Hargls and Associates  (1986).

Harris, J.C.  1982.   Rate  of  hydrolysis.   l£: Handbook of Chemical Property
Estimation  Methods, H.J. Lyman, W.F.  Reehl  and O.H. Rosenblatt, Ed.   McGraw
H111 Book Co., New York, NY.  p.  7-1, 7-4.

Haworth, S.,  T.  Lawlor,  K.   Hortelmans,  W.  Speck and  E.  Zelger.    1983.
Salmonella  mutagenlclty  test  results  for  250 chemicals.  Environ. Hutagen.
1: 3-142.

Horowitz, A., D.R.  Shelton, C.P.  Cornell  and J.M. Tledje.  1982.   Anaerobic
degradation of  aromatic compounds   In  sediment  and digested sludge.   Oev.
Ind. Mkroblol.   23: 435-444.

Houser,  W.H.    1983.    Biochemical  mechanisms of   toxlclty  of  orthochloro-
phenol.  Olss. Abstr. Int.  8.   44(6): 1799-B.

Huang,  J.C. and  E.F. Gloyna.   1968.   Effect of  organic compounds  on  photo-
synthetic oxygenatlon-1.   Chlorophyll  destruction  and  suppression  of  photo-
synthetic oxygen production.  Hater Res.  2:  347-366.

Huq. A.S.,  N.F.H.  Ho,  N.  HusaM,  G.L.  Flynn, W.E.  Jetzer and L.J.R.  Condle.
1986.   Permeation  of   water  contamlnatlve  phenols through  hairless  mouse
skin.  Arch. Environ. Contain.  Toxlcol.  15(5): 557-566.
0220d                               -52-                             04/17/90

-------
 Ingols,  R.S.,  P.E. Gaffney  and  P.C.  Stevenson.  1966.   Biological  activity
 of halophenols.  J. Water Pollut. Control Fed.  38:  629-635.

 Isaacson,  P.J.   1985.   Sorptlon  of   phenol  vapors  and  Influence  of  ring
 substitution.  Soil Sd.  140: 189-193.

 Isaacson,  P.J. and  C.R. Fink.   1984.   Nonreverslble  sorptlon of  phenolic
 compounds  by  sediment  fractions:  The   role  of  sediment  organic  matter.
 Environ. Sci.  Techno!.  18:  43-48.

 James,  R.H.,  R.E.  Adams, J.M. Finkel,  H.C.  Miller  and  J.O.  Johnson.   1984.
 Evaluation of  analytical methods  for  the  determination  of polic  in  combustion
 products.  J.  Proc.  - APCA  77th Ann.  Mtg.,  June  24-9,  1984.   San  Francisco,
CA.  Paper 84-18.5.  p. 1-25.

Joshlpura, P.8.  and  P.N.  Kellher.    1980.   Chlorinated  phenolic  compounds:
Formation, detection  and toxldty in  drinking  water.   lt±:  Hydrocarbon  Halo.
Hydrocarbon Aquatic Environ.,  B.K.  Argnar and  D. Mackay,  Ed.   Plenum Press,
New York, NY.  p.  453-460.

Kallmann.  M.J.,   E.A.   Coleman   and   J.F.   Borzelleca.    1982.   Behavioral
 toxldty of 2-chlorophenol  1n adult  mice.  Fed.  Proc.   41(5):  (Abstr. 7654)

Kanno,  S.  and K.  Nojlma.    1979.   Studies  on  photochemistry of  aromatic
hydrocarbons.   V.  Photochemical reaction   of  chlorobenzene  with  nitrogen
oxides  In air.  Chemosphere.  8:  225-232.
0220d                                53-                             04/17/90

-------
Keen,  R.  and  C.R. Balllod.  1985.   Toxlclty  of  Daphnla of the end products
of  wet oxidation  of  phenol  and substituted  phenols.   Water  Res.    19(6):
767-772.

Klncannon, O.F. and Y.S. Lin.   1985.  M1crob1al  degradation  hazardous  wastes
by land treatment.  Proc. Ind.  Waste Conf.   40:  607-619.

Knle,  3..  A.  Haellce,  I. Juhnke  and W.  Schiller.  1983.   Results of  studies
of  chemical   substances using   four  blotests.   Otsch.  Gewaesserkd.   M1H.
27(3): 77-79.
                                            »•
Kobayashl, K.t  H.  Akatake  and K. Manabe.   1979.  Relation between  toxldty
and accumulation of various chlorophenols 1n  goldfish.   Bull.  Jap. Soc.  Sc1.
Fish.  45(2):  173-175.

Konemann,  H. and  A. Musch.   1981.   Quantitative  structure-activity  relation-
ships  1n  fish  toxldty  studies parts 2: The  Influence  of  pH on  the  QSAR  of
chlorophenols.   Toxlcol.  19(3): 223-228.

Kool,  H.J.,  C.F.  VanKrelJl and  B.C.J.  Zoeteman.  1982.   Toxicology  assess-
ment  of organic compounds  1n drinking  water.   CrH.  Rev.  Environ.  Control.
12: 307-357.

Kopperman, H.L., R.M.  Carlson and R.  Caple.   1974.  Aqueous  chlorlnatlon and
ozonatlon  studies.  I.  Structure-toxlclty correlations  of  phenolic  compounds
to Daphnla maqna.   Chem. B1ol.  Interact.  9(4):  245-251.
0220d                               -54-                             04/17/90

-------
 Krumme,  M.L.  and S.A. Boyd.  1988.  Reductive dechlorInatloh of chlorinated
 phenols  In anaerobic upflow bioreactors.  Water  Res.   22:  171-177.

 LammeMng,  M.W.  and  N.C.  Burbank,  Jr.   1961.   The  toxldty  of  phenol,
 0-chlorophenol  and  0-n1trophenol  to blueglll  sunfish.   Proc.  15th  Ind.  Waste
 Conf., Purdue Univ. Eng. Ext.  Ser. NO.   106: 541-555.

 LeBlanc,  G.A.   1980.   Acute toxldty of  priority  pollutants to water  flea.
 Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxlcol.   24(5):  684-691.

 LeBlanc,  G.A.   1983.   Comparative  structure-toxldty  relationships  between
 acute  and chronic  effects  to  aquatic   organisms.   Environ.  Toxlcol.  Proc.
 Workshop Quant. Struct. Act. Relat.  4(3): 235-260.

 L1«,  0.,  K.   Thomson  and  K.L.E.  Kaiser.   1982.   Quantitative  strucutre
 toxldty  relationship  of halogenated  phenols on  bacteria.   Bull.  Environ.
 Contam. Toxlcol.  29(2): 130-136.

 Lucas,  S.V.   1984.   GC/MS  analysis of  organlcs  In  drinking water  concen-
 trates and advanced waste  treatment concentrates:  Vol. 1.   Analysis  results
 for  17  drinking  water,  16 advanced  waste  treatment  and  3 process  blank
 concentrates.    EPA-600/1 84-020A.   NTIS PB85-128221.    Columbus Labs. Health
 Eff. Res. Lab., Columbus, OH.   p. 46,  153, 177.

 Lund,  F.A.  and O.S.  Rodriguez.   1984.    Acclimation  of activated  sludge  to
mono-substituted  derivatives  of  phenol   and  benzole  adds.   J.  Gen.  Appl.
Mlcroblol.  30: 53-61.
0220d                               -55-                             04/17/90

-------
Mantel.  N.  and  M.A.   Schnelderman.   1975.   Estimating  "safe"   levels,  a
hazardous undertaking.   Cancer  Res.   35:  1379-1386.

Mcleese,  D.W.,   V.   ZHko  and  M.R.  Peterson.   1979.    Structure-lethality
relationships for  phenols,  anilines and  other  aromatic  compounds in  shrimp
and clams.  Chemosphere.  8(2):  53-57.

NIOSH  (National  Institute  for  Occupational   Safety  and   Health).    1984.
Department  of  National   Institute  for  Occupational   Safety  and  Health,
National Occupational Exposure  Survey (NOES),  Rockvllle,  MO.

Parker,  C.E.  and E.J.  PMbyl,  Jr.   1984.   Assessment  of  bacterial  ATP
response as  a measurement  of aquatic  toxldty.   Oept.  of C1v1l  Eng.,  Univ.
of Texas,  p. 283-293.

Phlpps,  G.L.,   G.W.  Holcombe  and  J.T.  Flandt.   1981.   Acute  toxklty  of
phenol  and  substituted phenols  to  the  fathead  minnow.    Bull.  Environ.
Contam. Toxlcol.  26(5): 585-593.

Pickering, Q.H.  and  C.  Henderson.   1966.   Acute  toxlclty of some  Important
petrochemicals to fish.   J. Water  Pollut. Control.  Fed.   38(9):  1419-1429.

Randall,  T.L.  and  P.V. Knopp.   1980.   Detoxification  of   specific organic
substances  by  wet  oxidation.   J.   Hater   Pdllut.  Control   Fed.    52(8):
2117-2130.
0220d
-56-
04/17/90

-------
 R1bo.  J.M.  and  K.L.E.  Kaiser.    1983.   Effects  of  selected  chemicals  to
 photolumlnescent  bacteria  and their  correlations with  acute and  sublethal
 effects on other organisms.  Chemosphere.  12(11-12):  1421-1442.

 Roberts, M.S., R.A. Anderson and  J.  SwarbMck.   1977.   Permeability of  human
 epidermis to phenolic compounds.   J. Pharm.  Pharmacol.   29:  677-683.

 SANSS  (Structure and  Nomenclature  Search System).   1989.   Database.   Online:
 3/28/89.

 Sax,  N.I.  and R.J.  Lewis.  1987.   Hawley's  Condensed  Chemical  Dictionary,
 llth ed.  Van Nostrand Relnhold Co., New York,  NY.   p. 270.

 Schafer, E.H., Jr., W.A.  Bowles,  Jr. and J. Hurlbut.   1983.   The acute oral
 toxldty,  repellency  and  hazard  potential  of  998  chemicals  to  one  or  more
 species  of  wild  and  domestic  birds.    Environ.   Contam.  Toxlcol.   12(3):
 355-382.

 Scow, K., M. Goyer, J. Perwak, C.  Woodruff  and  K.  Saterson.   1982.   Exposure
and  risk  assessment  for  chlorinated phenols (2-chlorophenol,  2,4-dlchloro-
phenol,    2,4,6-trlchlorophenol)     (Revtsed).     EPA-440/4-85-007.     NTIS
PB85-211951.  Arthur 0. Little Inc., Cambridge.  MA.   119 p.

Shlgeoka, T., Y. Sato,  Y.  Takeda, K. Yoshlda and  F. Yamauchl.   1988.   Acute
 toxlcity  of  chlorophenols  to  green  algae,  Selenastrutn  capMcornutum  and
Chlorella  vulqarls   and   quantitative  structure  activity   relationships.
Environ. Toxlcol.  Chem.  7(10): 847-854.
0220d                               -57-                             04/17/90

-------
SHhole, 8.8., D.T. Will lams. C. Lastorla and J.L. Robertson.  1986.  Deter-
mination of halogenated phenols In raw and potable water by  selected Ion gas
chromatography-mass spectrometry.   J.  Assoc.  Off.  Anal.  Chem.   69: 466-473.

Smith, J.H..  D. Mackay  and  C.W.K.  Nig.  1983.  Volatilization of pesticides
from water.  Res.  Rev.   85:  73-88.

Spencer, B. and R.T. HI!Hams.  1950.  Studies  In detoxlcatlon.  The metabo-
lism of halogenobenzenes.   Blochem.  J.  47:  279-284.
             •i
Stepan, S.,  J.F.  Smith  and  M.  Rlha.   1981.  Movement and chemical  change of
organic pollutants  1n  an  aquifer.    Austral. Water  Resources Council   Conf.
Ser.  1: 415-422.

Sufllta,  J.M. and  G.O.  Miller.    1985.    Mlcroblal  metabolism  of chloro-
phenoHc  compounds  \r\  groundwater  aquifers.   Environ. Toxlcol.  Chem.  4:
751-758.

Suntlo. L.R.,  W.Y.  Sh1u and 0. Mackay.   1988.   A review  of the nature and
properties of  chemicals  present In  pulp  mill  effluents.  Chemosphere.  17:
1249-1269, 1272-1281.  1284-1285, 1288-1290.

Tabak, H.H.,  S.A.  Quave.  C.I.  Mashnl  and E.F.  Barth.   1981.   Blodegradabll-
1ty  studies  with  organic priority  pollutant .-compounds.   J. Water Pollut.
Control Fed.   53:  1503-1518.
0220d                               -58-                             04/17/90

-------
Thomas,  R.G.   1982.   Volatilization  from water.   Ijr.  Handbook of  Chemical
Property Estimation Methods, W.J.  Lyman, W.F.  Reehl  and  D.H.  Rosenblatt,  Ed.
McGraw Hill Book Co., New York, NY.  p. 15-1  to 15-21, 15-26 to 15-30.

Tlssot, A.,  P.  Boule, J.  Lemalre,  S.  Lambert and  J.C.Palla.   1985.   Photo-
chemistry and environment:  10.  Evaluation  of  the  toxlclty of  the phototrans-
formatlon  products of  hydroqulnone and  chlorophenols  In aqueous  environ-
ments.  Chemosphere.  14(9): 1221-1230.

Trabalka, J.R. and  M.B.  Burch.   1978.   Investigation  of  the effects  of halo-
genated organic  compounds  produced 1n  cooling systems and process  effluents
on aquatic organisms.   Environ. Impact  Health Eff.  p. 163-173.

TSCAPP.  1989.   Computer Printout  of  Non-Confidential   Production  Data  from
TSCA Inventory OPTS, CIO, U.S.  EPA, Washington, OC.   Online: 3/28/89.

U.S. EPA.   1980a.   Guidelines  and  Methodology  in the Preparation  of  Health
Effect Assessment   Chapters  of  the  Consent   Decree  Drinking  Water  Criteria
Document.   Federal  Register.  45(231):  79347-79357.

U.S.  EPA.   1980b.    Ambient Water  Quality Criteria  Document  for  2-Chloro-
phenol.   Prepared   by  the  Office  of  Health  and Environmental  Assessment,
Environmental Criteria and  Assessment  Office, Cincinnati,  OH  for  the  Office
of Water Regulations  and Standards, Washington*  OC.   EPA 440/5-80-034.  NTIS
PB81-117459.
0220d                               -59-                             04/17/90

-------
U.S. EPA.   1983.   Reportable  Quantity  Document  for  2-Chlorophenol.   Prepared
by  the  Office  of  Health  and  Environmental  Assessment,  Environmental  Criteria
and  Assessment  Office,  Cincinnati,  OH  for  the  Office  of  Emergency  and
Remedial Response, Washington, DC.

U.S. EPA.   1984.   Methodology and Guidelines for Ranking  Chemicals  Based on
Chronic Toxldty  Data.   Prepared by the  Office of Health and  Environmental
Assessment, Environmental Criteria and  Assessment  Office,  Cincinnati,  OH for
the Office of Emergency and Remedial  Response, Washington,  DC.

U.S. EPA.   1986a.  Methodology  for  Evaluating  Reportable Quantity  Adjust-
ments  Pursuant .to  CERCLA  Section  102.   Prepared  by  Carcinogen  Assessment
Group,   Office   of  Health  and Environmental  Assessment  for   the  Office  of
Emergency and Remedial Response,  Washington, OC.

U.S.  EPA.    1986b.   Drinking Water   Criteria   Document   for  Chlorophenols.
Prepared by the Office of  Health and  Environmental  Assessment,  Environmental
Criteria and  Assessment  Office,  Cincinnati,  OH  for  the  Office of  Drinking
Water,  Washington, DC.

U.S. EPA.   1986c.  Reference  Values  for  Risk  Assessment.  Prepared  by the
Office  of  Health  and Environmental  Assessment,  Environmental  Criteria and
Assessment Office, Cincinnati, OH for  the  Office of Solid  Waste,  Washington,
DC.

U.S.  EPA.    1986d.   Guidelines   for   Carcinogen Risk  Assessment.   Federal
Register.  51(185): 33992-34003.


0220d                               -60-                             05/03/90

-------
U.S.  EPA.   1987.   Health and Environmental Effects Document  for  Chlorinated
Phenols.   Prepared by  the  Office  of  Health  and Environmental  Assessment,

Environmental  Criteria  and Assessment Office,  Cincinnati, OH  for  the  Office

of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, Washington, DC.


U.S.  EPA.   1988.   Integrated  Risk  Information  System  (IRIS).   Reference Dose

(RfD)  for   Oral  Exposure  for  2-Chlorophenol.    Online.   (Verification  date

1/20/88.)   Office  of  Health  and  Environmental  Assessment,  Environmental
                                               o
Criteria and Assessment Office,  Cincinnati, OH.


U.S.  EPA/OWRS.   1986.   Guidelines  for  Deriving Numerical  National   Water

Quality  Criteria  for  the  Protection of  Aquatic Organisms  and Their  Uses.

U.S. EPA, Washington, DC.  PB85-227049/XA8.  p. 22-58.


Wang,  W.  and  P.  Reed.  1984.   NHrobacter bloassay  for aquatic  toxldty.

Drug Chem.  Toxlcol.  1: 309-325.


Weast,  R.C.,  M.J.  Astle and  W.H.  Beyer.   1988.   CRC Handbook of  Chemistry

and Physics, 69th ed.  CRC  Press, Inc.,  Boca Raton,  FL.   p.  C-408.


Wegman,  R.C.C.  and A.W.H.   Hofstee.   1979.  Chlorophenols In  surface  waters

of the Netherlands (1976-1977).   Water Res.  13:  651-657.
                                      «

Wegman,  R.C.C.  and   H.H.  van  den  Broek.  1$83.    Chlorophenols  In  river

sediment 1n the Netherlands.  Water Res.  17:  227-230.
0220d                               -61-                             05/03/90

-------
WHO  (World  Health  Organization).   1984.   Guidelines  for'  Drinking  Water
Quality.   Vol.  2. Health  Criteria and  Other  Supporting Information.  WHO,
Geneva,  p. 221-239.

Wlndholz,  M.,  S.  Budavarl,  R.F.   Blumettl  and E.S.  Otterbeln.   1983.   The
Merck Index.  Merck and Co.,  Inc.,  Rahway,  NJ.   p.  302-303.

Yasuhara, A. and M. MorUa.  1988.  Formation  of chlorinated  aromatic  hydro-
carbons  by  thermal decomposition  of  vlnylldene chloride polymer.   Environ.
Sd. Technol.  22: 646-650.

Young,  D.R.   1978.    Priority  pollutants  In   municipal  wastewaters.  Ann.
Rep.-South. CA.  Coastal Water  Res. ProJ.  p.  103-112.
0220d                               -62-                             04/17/90

-------
                                  APPENDIX A

                              LITERATURE  SEARCHED



    This  HEED  Is  based  on  data  Identified  by  computerized  literature

searches of the following:

              CHEMLINE
              TSCATS
              CASR online (U.S. EPA Chemical Activities Status Report)
              TOXLINE
              T.OXLIT
              TOXLIT 65
              RTECS
              OHM TADS
              STORE!
              SRC Environmental Fate Data Bases
              SANSS
              AQUIRE
              TSCAPP
              NTIS
              Federal Register
              CAS ONLINE (Chemistry and Aquatic)
              HSOB


These  searches  were  conducted  In  May,   1988,  and  the following  secondary

sources were reviewed:
    ACGIH  (American  Conference of Governmental  Industrial  Hyglenlsts).
    1986.  Documentation  of  the  Threshold  Limit Values  and  Biological
    Exposure Indices, 5th ed.  Cincinnati, OH.

    ACGIH  (American  Conference of Governmental  Industrial  Hyglenlsts).
    1987.  TLVs:  Threshold  Limit  Values for Chemical  Substances  In  the
    Work  Environment  adopted  by   ACGIH  with   Intended  Changes   for
    1987-1988.   Cincinnati,  OH.  114 p.

    Clayton,   G.O. and   F.E.  Clayton,  Ed.   1981.   Patty's  Industrial
    Hygiene  and   Toxicology,  3rd  rev.  ed., Vol.  2A.   John  Wiley  and
    Sons. NY.  2878 p.

    Clayton,   G.O. and   F.E.  Clayton,  Ed.   1981.   Patty's  Industrial
    Hygiene  and   Toxicology,  3rd  rev.  ed., Vol.  2B.   John  WHey  and
    Sons. NY.  p. 2879-3816.
0220d                               -63-                             04/17/90

-------
    Clayton,  G.O.   and  F.E.  Clayton,  Ed.   1982.   Patty's"  Industrial
    Hygiene  and  Toxicology,  3rd  rev.  ed.,  Vol.  2C.    John  WUey  and
    Sons, NY.  p. 3817-5112.

    Grayson, M.  and 0. Eckroth,  Ed.   1978-1984.   K1rk-0thmer  Encyclo-
    pedia of Chemical technology, 3rd ed.  John  Wiley  and  Sons,  NY.   23
    Volumes.

    Hamilton, A. and H.L. Hardy.  1974.   Industrial  Toxicology,  3rd  ed.
    Publishing Sciences Group, Inc., Littleton,  MA.   575 p.

    IARC  (International  Agency  for  Research  on Cancer).   IARC  Mono-
    graphs  on   the  Evaluation  of  Carcinogenic  Risk   of  Chemicals  to
    Humans.  IARC,  WHO, Lyons, France.

    Jaber,  H.M.,  W.R.  Mabey,  A.T.  L1eu,  T.W.   Chou  and  H.L.  Johnson.
    1984.   Data  acquisition   for  environmental   transport   and   fate
    screening for compounds  of Interest  to  the Office of Solid Waste.
    EPA  600/6-84-010.    NTIS  PB84-243906.    SRI  International,   Menlo
    Park, CA.

    NTP  (National Toxicology  Program).   1987.    Toxicology Research  and
    Testing  Program.   Chemicals   on   Standard  Protocol.   Management
    Status.

    Ouellette.   R.P. and  J.A.  King.    1977.    Chemical  Week  Pesticide
    Register.  McGraw-Hill  Book Co., NY.

    Sax,  I.N.  1984.   Dangerous Properties of  Industrial Materials,  6th
    ed.  Van Nostrand Relnhold Co.,  NY.

    SRI  (Stanford   Research  Institute).   1987.   Directory of  Chemical
    Producers.   Menlo Park,  CA.

    U.S.  EPA.   1986.   Report  on Status  Report  In  the Special  Review
    Program,  Registration   Standards   Program  and   the  Data  Call   In
    Programs.  Registration  Standards and  the  Data  Call  In  Programs.
    Office of Pesticide Programs,  Washington,  DC.

    USITC  (U.S.   International  Trade  Commission).   1986.    Synthetic
    Organic  Chemicals.   U.S.  Production  and Sales,  1985, USITC  Publ.
    1892, Washington,  DC.

    Verschueren.  K.   1983.   Handbook of  Environmental  Data  on  Organic
    Chemicals,  2nd ed.   Van Nostrand Reinhold Co., NY.

    Wlndholz. M., Ed.  1983.   The Merck  Index... 10th ed.  Merck and Co.,
    Inc., Rahway, NJ.

    Worthing, C.R.  and S.B.  Walker,  Ed.   1983.  The  Pesticide  Manual.
    British Crop Protection Council.  695 p.
0220d                               -64-                             04/17/90

-------
    In  addition,  approximately 30  compendia of aquatic  toxlclty  data were

reviewed. Including the following:


    Battelle's  Columbus  Laboratories.   1971.   Hater  Quality  Criteria
    Data  Book.   Volume  3.  Effects  of  Chemicals   on   Aquatic   Life.
    Selected  Data  from the Literature  through  1968.  Prepared for  the
    U.S. EPA under Contract No. 68-01-0007.  Washington,  DC.

    Johnson,  H.W.  and M.T. Finley.   1980.  Handbook of  Acute  ToxlcHy
    of  Chemicals   to   Fish and   Aquatic   Invertebrates.   Summaries  of
    Toxklty  Tests  Conducted  at  Columbia  National  Fisheries  Research
    Laboratory.   1965-1978.   U.S.  Dept.  Interior,  Fish  and  Wildlife
    Serv. Res. Publ. 137,  Washington, DC.

    McKee,  J.E. and H.W.  Wolf.  1963.  Water Quality Criteria, 2nd  ed.
    Prepared  for   the  Resources   Agency  of  California,  State   Water
    Quality Control Board.   Publ.  No. 3-A.

    Plmental, D.   1971.  Ecological  Effects  of  Pesticides  on  Non-Target
    Species.  Prepared for  the U.S.  EPA, Washington,  DC.   PB-269605.

    Schneider. 8.A.   1979.  Toxicology  Handbook.   Mammalian and Aquatic
    Data.   Book 1:  Toxicology  Data.   Office  of  Pesticide  Programs,  U.S.
    EPA. Washington, DC.   EPA 540/9-79-003.  NTIS P8  80-196876.
0220d                               -65-                             04/17/90

-------
                                                 APPENDIX  B



                                      Summary  Table  for  2-Chlorophenol
o
ru
ro
o
Q.
Species
Inhalation exposure
Subchronlc 10
Chronic ID
Cardnogenlclty 10
Oral exposure
& Subchronlc rat
i
Chronic rat
Cardnogenlclty 10
REPORTABLE QUANTITIES
Based on chronic toxlclty:
o
£ Based on carclnogenUlty:
-j
Exposure
10
10
ID

50 ppm (5 mg/kg/day)
from 3 weeks of age
through parturition
50 ppm (5 mg/kg/day)
from 3 weeks of age
through parturition
10

1000
10
Effect
10
10
10

NOAEL for decreased
litter size, In-
creased stillbirths
NOAEL for decreased
litter size. In-
creased stillbirths
ID



RfO or qi* Reference
ID 10
10 ID
10 ID

0.005 mg/kg/day Exon and
Koller.
0.005 mg/kg/day Exon and
Koller.
10 10

Exon and
Koller.
ID




1982
1982


1982

10 = Insufficient data

-------
                                  APPENDIX C
         DOSE/DURATION RESPONSE GRAPHS FOR EXPOSURE TO 2-CHIOROPHENOL
C.I.   DISCUSSION
    A  dose/duration-response  graph  for  oral  exposure  to  2-chlorophenol
generated  by  the method of  Crockett  et al.  (1985)  using  the computer soft-
ware by Durkin and  Meylan  (1988)  developed under contract  to ECAO-Clnn1nnat1
Is presented  in  Figure C-l.  Data used  to generate this graph are presented
In  Section  C.2.   In  the  generation  of  this  figure,  all  responses  are
classified as  adverse (FEU AEL or LOAEL)  or  nonadverse (NOEL or NOAEL)  for
plotting.  For oral exposure,  the  ordlnate expresses dosage  as human equiva-
lent dose.  The  animal  dosage  In  mg/kg/day Is'multiplied by  the cube root of
the ratio  of  the animal:human body weight  to  adjust for species differences
In basal metabolic  rate  (Mantel and  Schnelderman,  197S).  The result Is then
multiplied by  70 kg,   the  reference  human body  weight,  to express  the human
equivalent dose as mg/day for a 70 kg human.
    The boundary  for   adverse  effects  (solid  line)  is  drawn  by Identifying
the lowest adverse  effect  dose or concentration at  the  shortest duration of
exposure at which  an   adverse  effect  occurred.  From  this  point,  an Infinite
line Is  extended upward, parallel  to  the dose  axis.  The starting point Is
then connected  to  the  lowest  adverse  effect  dose  or  concentration  at  the
next longer duration  of  exposure  that has  an  adverse effect dose or concen-
tration equal  to  or lower   than the previous  one.   This  process  is  continued
to the lowest adverse  effect  dose  or  concentration.   From  this point,  a line
1s  extended  to  the right,  parallel  to  the  duration axis.   The  region  of
adverse effects lies above  the adverse effects boundary.
    Using  the  envelope method, the  boundary  for no  adverse effects (dashed
line)  Is drawn by  identifying  the  highest no  adverse effects dose or concen-
tration.   From this point,  a line parallel to the duration  axis 1s extended

0220d                                -67-                             04/17/90

-------
iwetM


*
* ,.,..-.
s
I

k
C



a
t
9
|k

Z
C i ^ •
f A IP
•
X
J •

C.-*: £M«MI»U
r-»5— ' 	 • < . i MI 	 1 — 	 	 • — ' ' 	 |

; r»
•
..__.. « ••* • •

• *7 "'•-..
'. U2 ''•••.
\ ' ,s
— * ***•
r* *
» *.
; \ nl '"i
' 4 _B^^^
, \
\
' >
\
* \
\

0fll •••! «.l 1
•UMN C«UIV MIMTIOM 
n-> UWCLOr MTHO»
:
j
1
1
1
•J •
5
j
i



|4 3
•*
J
J
n
j
^
1
i a


     Key:    F . FEL
            A . AEL
            n . NOAEL
            N . NOEL
            Solid line . Adverse Effects  Boundary
            Dashed line • No Adverse Effects  Boundary
                                 FIGURE C.I

              Dose/Duration  - Response Graph  for Oral Exposure
                     to 2-Chlorophenol:  Envelope Method
02204
-68-
04/17/90

-------
 to  the dose or concentration axis.  The  starting  point  Is  then connected to
 the  next  lower or equal no  adverse  effect  dose  or concentration at a longer
 duration  of  exposure.   When this process can  no  longer  be  continued, a line
 Is  dropped  parallel  to the  dose or  concentration  axis  to the duration axis.
 The  no adverse effects  region  lies below  the no  adverse  effects  boundary.
 At  either  ends  of  the graph  between  the  adverse  effects  and no  adverse
 effects boundaries  are regions  of  ambiguity.   The area (1f  any)  resulting
 from  Intersection  of the adverse  effects and no  adverse effects boundaries
 Is defined as  the region of  contradiction.
    In  the  censored  data method, all no adverse  effect  points located In the
 region  of contradiction are dropped from  consideration  and  the no  adverse
 effect  boundary  is redrawn  so that  1t  does  not Intersect the adverse effects
 boundary  and no region  of  contradiction 1s  generated. This  method results In
 the most  conservative definition of the no adverse effects region.
    Figure  C-l  presents  the dose-duration  response  graph  generated  by  the
envelope  method.   The adverse  effects  boundary  Is  defined by  five  points,
corresponding  to  an  LD5Q  In rats  of 670 mg/kg  (Deichmann,  1943} (Rec.  #5),
 renal  and hepatocellular  necrosis  In  rats   from  an acute dose  of  300 mg/kg
 (Houser,  1983)  (Rec.  #9),  an oral  L05Q of  346 mg/kg 1n  mice  (Borzelleca et
al.,  1985)  (Rec.  #6),  motor Impairment  1n  mice  treated  by  gavage  with  a
single  dose of  63 mg/kg (Borzelleca, 1983)  (Rec.  #7) and a  gavage  dose of  1
mg/kg/day for  2  days, explained only  as the  lowest  dose that caused behav-
 ioral  effects  In  mice (Borzelleca,  1983) (Rec. |8).  The no adverse effects
boundary  Is defined  by two points,  representing no  Immunologlcal  effects
observed  1n rats  at  dose  levels  <50  mg/kg  (500  ppm  in drinking water)
administered prenatally and continued  <15  weeks  (Exon  and  Koller, 1983a,
1985)  (Rec.  #11), and  the  other  representing  a  2-year study by  Exon  and
0220d                               -69-                             04/17/90

-------
Keller  (1985)  where no  hematologlcal  effects  were seen  In'  rats  at  the  5

mg/kg dosage (50 ppm in drinking water)  (Rec.  #4).   The region  of contradic-

tion 1s quite large and cannot be censored because of insufficient data.

C.2.  DATA USED TO GENERATE OOSE/DURATION-RESPONSE GRAPHS

C.2.1.  Inhalation Exposure.   No Inhalation toxlcUy data were located.

C.2.2.  Oral Exposure.

Chemical Name:     2-Chlorophenol
CAS Number:       95-57-8
Document Title:   Health and  Environmental Errects Document on 2-Clilorophenol
Document Number:  Pending
Document Date:     Pending
Document Type:     HEED
RECORD #1
Comment:
Species:
Sex:
Effect:
Route:
Rats
Female
NOEL
Water
Dose:                  5.000
Duration Exposure:      90.0 days
Duration Observation:  90.0 days
               Number Exposed:
               Number Responses:
               Type of Effect:
               Site of Effect:
               Severity Effect:
                    13
                    0
                    8
50 ppm  (range 0.  5.  50, 500  ppm),  assume  water  consumption
factor  of  0.1.    Exposure  from  weaning  through  breeding,
lactation.
Citation:
RECORD #2:

Comment:
Citation:
Exon and K-oller, 1982, 1985
Species: Rats Dose: 50.
Sex: Female Duration Exposure: 90.
Effect: LOAEL Duration Observation: 90.
Route: Water
Number Exposed: 13
Number Responses: NR
Type of Effect: REPRO
Site of Effect: FETUS
Severity Effect: 8
500 ppm (see previous record); effects were decreased
size and Increased numbers of stillborn.
Exon and Holler, 1982, 1985

000
0 days
0 days

litter

0220d
                     -70-
                                           04/17/90

-------
RCCORO #3:
Comment:


Citation:
Species:
Sex:
Effect:
Route:
Rats
Both
LOAEL
Water
Dose:            ';-     50.000
Duration Exposure:     24.0 months
Duration Observation:  24.0 months
Number Exposed:     NR
Number Responses:   NR
Type of Effect:     HEMAT
Site of Effect:     BLOOD
Severity Effect:    1

500 ppm (range  0, 5,  SO,  500  ppm).   Assumed water consumption
factor of 0.1.  No other noncancer endpolnts evaluated.

Exon and Koller, 1985
RECORD #4:
Comment:

Citation:
Species:
Sex:
Effect:
Route:
Rats
Both
NOEL
Hater
Dose:                 5.000
Duration Exposure;    24.0 months
Duration Observation: 24.0 months
                                   NR.
                                   0
Number Exposed:
Number Responses
Type of Effect:
Site of Effect:
Severity Effect:
50 ppm (see previous record).

Exon and Koller, 1985
RECORD #5
Comment:

Citation:
Specles:
Sex:
Effect:
Route:
Rats
NS
PEL
Gavage
Dose:
Duration
Duration
                                                     Exposure:
                                                     Observation:
670.000
1.0 days
1.0 days
               Number Exposed:     NR
               Number Responses:   NR
               Type of Effect:     DEATH
               SHe of Effect:     BODY
               Severity Effect:    10
     dose.
Oelchmann, 1943
0220d
                      71
                                           04/17/90

-------
RECORD #6:
Comment:

Citation:
Comment:

Citation:
RECORD #8:
Comment:

Citation:
Species:
Sex:
Effect:
Route:
Mice
Both
PEL
Gavage
Dose:                   346.000
Duration Exposure:      1.0 days
Duration Observation:   14.0 days
Number Exposed:     20
Number Responses:   NR
Type of Effect:     DEATH
Site of Effect:     BODY
Severity Effect:    10

1050 dose.

Borzelleca et al., 1985
RECORD #7:



Species:
Sex:
Effect:
Route:
Mice
Both
AEL
Gavage
                                            Dose:                   63.000
                                            Duration Exposure:      1.0 days
                                            Duration Observation:   14.0 days
Number Exposed:      NR
Number Responses:   NR
Type of Effect:      MOTOR
Site of Effect:     • MSKEl
Severity Effect:    9

£050 dose for Impaired motor function.

Borzelleca, 1983
Species:
Sex:
Effect:
Route:
Mice
NS
LOAEL
Gavage
                             Dose:
                             Duration
                             Duration
                                                     Exposure:
                                                     Observation;
                                         1.000
                                         2.0 days
                                         2.0 days
Number Exposed:     NR
Number Responses:   NR
Type of Effect:     BEHAV
Site of Effect:     BODY
Severity Effect:    7

Lowest dose producing behavioral changes after 2 days exposure

Borzelleca, 1983
0220d
                     -72-
                                           04/17/90

-------
 RECORD  #9:
Comment:


Citation:
Species:
Sex:
Effect:
Route:
Rats
NS
PEL
Oral. NOS
               Number Exposed:     NR
               Number Responses:   NR
               Type of Effect:     NECHU
               Site of Effect:     KIONY
               Severity Effect:    6
Oose:            "      300.000
Duration Exposure:      1.0  days
Duration Observation:   1.0  days
                             NR
                             NR
                             NhCRO
                             LIVER
                             5
Metabolism  study:   tentrilobular  hepatic  Metro*Is
rats; renal necrosis In 75% of rats.

Houser, 1983
                                         In  50% of
RECORD #10:

Comment:
Citation:
RECORD #11:
Species: Rats
Sex: NS
Effect: LOAEL
Route: Oral, NOS
Number Exposed: NR
Number Responses: NR
Type of Effect: WGTDC
SHe of Effect: BODY
Severity Effect: 4
Range 65 and 130 mg/kg/day
Chung, 1978
Species: Rats
Sex: Both
Effect: NOEL
Route: Water
Dose: 65.000
Duration Exposure: 3.0 weeks
Duration Observation: 3.0 weeks
NR
NR
ATROP
LIVER
4


Oose: 50.000
Duration Exposure: 90.0 days
Duration Observation: 90.0 days
Comment:


Citation;
Number Exposed:     NR
Number Responses:   0
Type of Effect:
SHe of Effect:
Severity Effect:    3

No  Immune  effects  seen at  levels  <500  ppm
(50 mg/kg/day); range 0, 5, 50, 500 ppm.

Exon and Koller, 19S3a
                                 in drinking  water
0220d
                     -73-
                                           04/17/90

-------
RECORD #12:
Coninent:
Citation:
Species: Mice
Sex: NS
Effect: LOAEL
Route: Gavage
Number Exposed:
Number Responses:
Type of Effect:
Site of Effect:
Severity Effect:

NR
NR
FUNS
BRAIN
7
                             Dose:            "•     35.000
                             Duration  Exposure:     4.0 days
                             Duration  Observation:  4.0 days
Hyperactivity that  stopped  when  treatment ceased.   Mortality
occurred at 175  mgAg/day.

Kailman et al.,  1982
NS » Not.stated
0220d
                     -74-
04/17/90

-------