United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Industrial Environmental Research EPA 600 2-79-210o
Laboratory          December 1979
Cincinnati OH 45268
Reeearch and Development
Status
Assessment of
Toxic Chemicals
Vinylidene Chloride

-------
                RESEARCH REPORTING SERIES

Research reports of the Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, have been grouped into nine series. These nine broad cate-
gories were established to facilitate further development and application of en-
vironmental technology. Elimination of traditional grouping was consciously
planned to foster technology transfer and a maximum interface in  related fields.
The nine series are:

      1.  Environmental Health  Effects Research
      2.  Environmental Protection Technology
      3.  Ecological Research
      4.  Environmental Monitoring
      5.  Socioeconomic Environmental Studies
      6.  Scientific and Technical Assessment Reports (STAR)
      7.  Interagency Energy-Environment Research and Development
      8.  "Special" Reports
      9.  Miscellaneous Reports

This report has been assigned  to the  ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION TECH-
NOLOGY series. This series describes research performed to develop and dem-
onstrate instrumentation, equipment, and methodology to repair  or prevent en-
vironmental degradation from point and non-point sources of pollution. This work
provides the new or improved technology required for the control and treatment
of pollution-sources to meet environmental quality standards.
This document is available to the public through the National Technical Informa-
tion Service, Springfield, Virginia  22161.

-------
                                     EPA-600/2-79-2100
                                     December 1979
    STATUS ASSESSMENT OF TOXIC CHEMICALS:

             VINYLIDENE CHLORIDE
                     by
                D. R. Tierney
               T. R. Blackwood
        Monsanto Research Corporation
             Dayton, Ohio  45407

                     and

                 M. R. Piana
             Radian Corporation
            Austin, Texas  78766
           Contract No. 68-03-2550
               Project Officer

               David L.  Becker
    Industrial Pollution Control Division
Industrial Environmental Research Laboratory
           Cincinnati, Ohio  45268
INDUSTRIAL ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LABORATORY
     OFFICE OF RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
   U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
          CINCINNATI, OHIO  45268

-------
                           DISCLAIMER
This report has been reviewed by the Industrial Environmental
Research Laboratory - Cincinnati, U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, and approved for publication.  Approval does not signify
that the contents necessarily reflect the views and policies of
the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, nor does mention of
trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or
recommendation for use.
                               11

-------
                            FOREWORD


     When energy and material resources are extracted, processed,
converted, and used, the related pollutional impacts on our
environment and even on our health often require that new and
increasingly more efficient pollution control methods be used.
The Industrial Environmental Research Laboratory - Cincinnati
(lERL-Ci) assists in developing and demonstrating new and
improved methodologies that will meet these needs both effi-
ciently and economically.

     This report contains a status assessment of the air
emissions, water pollution, health effects, and environmental
significance of asbestos.  This study was conducted to provide
a better understanding of the distribution and characteristics
of this pollutant.  Further information on this subject may be
obtained from the Organic Chemicals and Products Branch,
Industrial Pollution Control Division.

     Status assessment reports are used by lERL-Ci to communi-
cate the readily available information on selected substances to
government, industry, and persons having specific needs and
interests.  These reports are based primarily on data from open
literature sources,  including government reports.   They are
indicative rather than exhaustive.
                                  David G.  Stephan
                                      Director
                    Industrial Environmental Research Laboratory
                                     Cincinnati
                               111

-------
                            ABSTRACT
Vinylidene chloride (VDC) is synthesized from ethylene dichloride
with 109 x 103 metric tons produced annually. VDC monomer is used
in the manufacture of barrier coatings, fibers, and plastics.  It
is estimated that 1.0 x 103 to 1.8 x 103 metric tons/yr of vinyl-
idene chloride are emitted to the atmosphere from VDC production
and consumption.

Control technology for VDC production includes activated carbon
adsorption, refrigerated solvent scrubbing, incineration, and
vent recovery systems.  Technology effective in controlling
vinyl chloride emissions is applicable to VDC; industry is
therefore adopting similar controls.

Exposure to vinylidene chloride may cause adverse effects to the
central nervous system and liver functions of humans.  Recent
studies have indicated that a high percentage of workers exposed
to chronic levels of VDC have shown a substantial loss in liver
function.  NIOSH is planning to evaluate further studies to
determine what workplace standards should be adopted.

The quantity and composition of organic pollutants from plants
where VDC is produced or consumed was not available for this
report.  Quantitative analysis and assessment of pollutants from
plants where VDC is used needs to be accomplished to determine
the potential health hazards of VDC production and consumption
to surrounding populations.

This report was submitted in partial fulfillment of Contract
68-02-2550 by Monsanto Research Corporation under the sponsorship
of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.  This report covers
the period November 1, 1977 to December 31, 1977.  The work was
completed as of January 20, 1978.
                               IV

-------
                            CONTENTS
Foreword	iii
Abstract	   iv
Figures	   vi
Tables ..... 	   vi
Conversion Factors and Metric Prefixes 	  vii
Acknowledgement	viii

   1.  Introduction. . . . -	    1
   2.  Summary	    2
   3.  Source Description	    5
            Chemical and physical properties 	    5
            Production 	    6
            Process description	    7
            Uses	    8
   4.  Environmental Significance and Health Effects ....   12
            Environmental significance 	   12
            Health effects 	   16
   5.  Control Technology	   19
            Workspace environment	   19
            VDC recovery	   19
            Organic waste incineration 	   19
            Storage tank emissions 	   20
            Current-industry efforts 	   20
   6.  Regulatory Actions in Progress	   22

References	   23
                                v

-------
                             FIGURES


Number                                                       Page

  1   Flow diagram showing the production and
        purification of vinylidene chloride 	   8

  2   Geographic distribution of plants that process
        vinylidene chloride 	  11

  3   Saran emulsion process	14

  4   Saran suspension process	14
                             TABLES


  1   Vinylidene Chloride 	  3

  2   Chemical and Physical Properties of VDC 	  5

  3   Typical Analysis of VDC 	  6

  4   Atmospheric Reactivity of VDC to Atmospheric Radicals .  6

  5   VDC Production LocationxS (1974)	  7

  6   Consumption and End Use of Vinylidene Chloride (1974) . 10

  7   Estimated.Annual Emissions of Vinylidene Chloride
        in the United States	15

  8   Estimated Population Around VDC Plants	16

  9   Acute Toxicity of Vinylidene Chloride 	 18
                               VI

-------
             CONVERSION FACTORS AND METRIC PREFIXES3
                       CONVERSION FACTORS

  To convert from      	to	      Multiply by

Degree Celsius (°C)    Degree Fahrenheit         t° = 1.8 t° + 32
Kilogram (kg)          Pound-mass (pound-mass
                         avoirdupois)                       2.204
Kilometer2 (km2)        Mile2                         3.860 x 10"1
Meter3 (m3)            Foot3                          3.531 x 10l
Meter3 (m3)            Gallon (U.S.  liquid)           2.642 x 102
Metric ton             Pound-mass                     2.205 x 103
Pascal (Pa)            Pound-force/inch2 (psi)        1.450 x lO"4


                         METRIC PREFIXES

  Prefix  Symbol  Multiplication factor  	Example	

   Kilo     k             103            1 kg = 1 x 103 grams
   Milli    m             10~3           1 mm = 1 x 10~3 meter
 Standard for Metric Practice.  ANSI/ASTM Designation:
 E 380-76% IEEE Std 268-1976, American Society for Testing and
 Materials, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, February 1976.  37 pp.
                               vii

-------
                         ACKNOWLEDGEENT
This report was assembled for EPA by Radian Corporation, Austin,
TX, and Monsanto Research Corporation, Dayton, OH.  Mr. D. L.
Becker served as EPA Project Officer, and Dr. C. E. Prank, EPA
Consultant, was principal advisor and reviewer.
                              Vlll

-------
                            SECTION 1

                          INTRODUCTION
Vinylidene chloride  (VDC) is an important monomer in the manu-
facture of methyl chloroform, saran, and other plastics.  In
January, 1976, The National Institute of Occupational Safety and
Health  (NIOSH) reported that about 60% of workers examined in a
New Jersey plant using VDC had developed liver disorders and
announced its intention to investigate the situation.  Previous
laboratory animal studies had suggested that VDC might be a
liver carcinogen and might produce a number of other adverse
health effects.

This report briefly describes the production and environmental
release of VDC.  Potential human exposure and health effects due
to VDC exposure are also given.  Present and future control tech-
nology for VDC emissions are explained along with government
regulatory actions.

-------
                            SECTION 2

                             SUMMARY
The manufacture of vinylidene chloride  (VDC) is commercially
significant, with an annual production level of 109 x 103 metric
tons3.  End uses of vinylidene chloride include polymerization of
the monomer to form barrier resins used in film coating and the
fabrication of various packaging materials.  Approximately 80%
of the vinylidene chloride produced is used captively to produce
1,1,1-trichloroethane or in polymer synthesis.

Emissions of VDC adversely affect humans.  Exposure to VDC
causes central nervous system depression, skin and eye irrita-
tion, and altered liver function.  VDC is also a suspected
carcinogen.  It has been estimated that 1.0 x 103 to 1.8 x 103
metric tons/yr of vinylidene chloride are emitted to the atmos-
phere from VDC synthesis and polymerization and from polymer
fabrication.  Within a 5-mile radius of all plants where VDC is
produced or used, there are 3.6 million persons Who may be ex-
posed to VDC emissions.

Control technology for VDC emissions during production include
activated carbon adsorbers, refrigerated solvent scrubbing
systems and incinerators.  Storage tank emissions are controlled
by refrigerated vent recovery systems or return venting to main
process streams.  Workers at industrial sites where VDC is made
or used have the greatest risk from exposure.  Careful plant
maintenance and handling procedures are mandatory precautions
to ensure a reasonably safe work environment.

A workplace standard may be recommended by the National Institute
of Occupational Safety and Health  (NIOSH).  Preliminary studies
have indicated that VDC regulation under the Clean Air Act is not
warranted at this time.

Table 1 summarizes major points of information given in the
report on production, transportation, and uses of VDC.
 1 metric ton = 106 grams; conversion factors and metric  system
 prefixes are presented in the prefatory pages of this report.

-------
                                                    TABLE  1.    VINYLIDENE  CHLORIDE
                                                      Extent of problem
                  Emission source
Emission quantity,
  metric tons/yr
 Population exposed,
	persons	
                                                                                           Control method
       Regulatory action
U)
          Production:

            From ethylene dichloride
    1.5 x 103
                            89,000
          Transportation:

            Vehicle loading and cleaning


          Industrial use:
    0.3 x 103a
         _b
                      Carbon adsorbers, refrigerated
                        solvent scrubbing, incinera-
                        tion, refrigerated vent
                        recovery systems, controls
                        similar to vinyl chloride
                        control.
                                         Purge lines to  carbon adsorp-
                                           tion unit or  incinerator.
Regulation under  Sections 111
  and 112 of Clean Air Act not
  needed at this  time.
  TLV - 40 mg/m3.

Designated as a priority pollu-
  tant under the  Federal Water
  Pollution Control Act.
                                                     Tank car size has been limited
                                                       to 95 m3.
Consumption, 1974
18 x 103 metric tons/yr
polymer i zation
fabrication

0.3 x 103a
_D
_b

3,500.000
_b
_b

_b
_b

Workplace standards
recommended .


may be

           Value represents the mass of emissions for both transportation and industrial use.
           Information unknown.

-------
Based on the information provided in this report, the following
items should be considered in future studies:

   • Environmental levels of VDC.

   • Quantity and composition of emissions from the polymeri-
     zation and use of VDC polymers in fabricated products.

   • Amount of VDC and related compounds discharged to
     waterways.

   • The effectiveness and cost of control technology
     applicable to VDC production and consumption facilities.

   • Chronic effects of prolonged low level exposure to VDC.

Due to the demonstrated toxicity of VDC, it is recommended that
VDC emissions be regulated from plants where VDC is produced or
consumed.  Imposed regulations need to be based on health effects
data and pollutant assessments from VDC plants.  Acceptable
environmental levels of VDC need to be defined.

-------
                             SECTION 3

                        SOURCE DESCRIPTION
CHEMICAL AND PHYSICAL  PROPERTIES

The chemical name for  VDC is 1,1-dichloroethylene and  its  molec-
ular formula is  CH2=CC12-  The properties of VDC are listed  in
Table 2.


      TABLE 2.   CHEMICAL AND PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF VDC  (1)
    Molecular weight:  97.0               Physical state:  Volatile liquid
    Vapor pressure:    82.28 kPa at 25°C    Melting point:   -122.53°C
    Boiling point:     37°C at 101.33 kPa   Solubility:     Insoluble (H2O)
    Density:          1.213 at 20°C/4°C
The flash point  of  VDC is about -10°C, but it will not support
combustion.   The explosive limit range is 7 to 16 volume percent
in room temperature air.

VDC polymerizes  spontaneously within 48 hours of production.
If it is stored,  small amounts of polymerization inhibitors
(hydroquinone, alkylamines,  or organic sulfur derivatives) are
added  (2).   If VDC  is stored in the presence of air or oxygen
without an  inhibitor at temperatures in fene range of -40°C to
+25"C, the  oxygen dissolves  and reacts quickly to form a per-
oxide compound.   The peroxide compound is violently explosive.
It is adsorbed on the polymer and any separation (i.e., degrada-
tion) of this polymer will result in an explosive compound.  A
slight mechanical shock or heat will detonate a dry compound
containing  more  than 15%  of  the peroxide (1).  A typical analysis
of commercial grade VDC is shown in Table 3.
 (1)  Kirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology,  Second
     Edition,  Volume 21.  John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New  York,
     New  York,  1970.  pp. 275-279.

 (2)  Hushon,  J.  and M. Kornreich.  Air Pollution Assessment of
     Vinylidene  Chloride.  MTR-7230.  U.S. Environmental  Protec-
     tion Agency,  Research Triangle Park, North Carolina,  May
     1976.   73 pp.

-------
The slow decomposition of VDC  peroxides will produce formalde-
hyde, phosgene, and hydrochloric acid.   A sharp acrid odor
probably indicates the presence of peroxides (1).   The atmos-
pheric reactivity of VDC is  given in Table 4 (3).


              TABLE 3.  TYPICAL ANALYSIS OF VDC (1)

Constituent, ppma
Vinylidene chloride, wt%
Vinyl chloride
cis-1, 2-dichloroethylene
trans-i, 2-dichloroethylene
1, 1-Dichloroethane
Ethylene dichloride
1,1, 1-Trichloroethane
Trichloroethylene inhibitor
MEHQC grade
Phenol grade, wt%
Value
99.7
850
500
1,500
10
10
150
10
200
0.6 to 0.8

                Except where indicated.
                Excluding inhibitor.
                Monomethyl ether of hydroquinone.
             TABLE 4.  ATMOSPHERIC  REACTIVITY OF VDC
                       TO ATMOSPHERIC  RADICALS (3)

            Activity  towards
                radical	Half life	

                Ozone         <1 day
                Ketone         >1,000 days
                Hydroxyl       <1 day, producing phosgene
                               and  formaldehyde
PRODUCTION

Vinylidene chloride  is produced at three locations with a total
estimated production of  109  x 103  metric tons/yr.  Table 5
identifies manufacturers and estimated production levels.

The chlorination of  ethylene dichloride produces 1,1,2-trichloro-
ethane and it is estimated that the use of ethylene dichloride
(3)  Dorigan J.  Scoring  of  Organic Air Pollutants:  Chemistry,
     Production, and Toxicity of Selected Synthetic Organic
     Chemicals.  Mitre Corporation, September, 1976.

-------
for the production of VDC will increase at an average  annual
rate of 7% from 1974 to 1979.  It is also estimated  that  the
consumption of methyl chloroform, used in the other  VDC produc-
tion method, will not change over this time period.

             TABLE  5.  VDC  PRODUCTION LOCATIONS  (1974)


                                                 Production,
   	Producer	Location	10 3 metric tons/yr

   Dow  Chemical, Co.      Freeport,  TX               64a
                         Plaquemine,  LA

   PPG  Industries,  Inc.   Lake Charles, LA           45

   TOTAL                                             109


    Dow was  planning  to  expand plant capacity  during  1975.

    Approximately  32  x 103  metric tons (70%)  of  this  VDC
    production were used to manufacture 1,1,1-trichloroethane.

 PROCESS DESCRIPTION

 Vinylidene  chloride  (VDC)  is made from ethylene dichloride.
 Intermediates may  be 1,1,1-trichloroethane  (methyl chloroform)  or
 1,1,2-trichloroethane.   In addition,  VDC  is  used to  manufacture
 methyl chloroform  only  when the  VDC has been  produced  from
 1,1,2-trichloroethane.   The actual  amount of  VDC produced and
 consumed  is unknown;  however,  77 x  103 metric tons is  ultimately
 produced.   An additional  32 x 103 metric  tons is estimated to  be
 formed as an intermediate  to methyl chloroform.  The reversible
 reaction  for the  formation of VDC from methyl chloroform  is (4):

                     CH3CC13 	>  CH2=CC12  + HC1                (1)
                     methyl      vinylidene hydrochloric
                     chloroform  chloride   acid

 VDC is also made by  dehydrochlorinating 1,1,2-trichloroethane
 with lime or aqueous sodium hydroxide, as shown in Equation 2 (4).

          CH2C1CHC12  +  NaOH 	»- CH2=CC12 + NaCl + H20       (2)

 1,1,2-trichloroethane + sodium     VDC    + sodium  +  water
                      hydroxide           chloride

 This reaction takes  place  at approximately 70°C in a long cylin-
 drical reaction vessel. The crude  product is separated by dis-
 tillation under a  nitrogen atmosphere.  A phenolic inhibitor is
 (4) Sherwood, P. W.   Raw Materials  for Plastics  and  Resins.
    Industrial and Engineering Chemistry,  54(12) :30,  1962.

-------
generally added  to the distilled product.   Product VDC 'is puri-
fied by washing  with ferrous sulfate  and  caustic soda solution.
After washing, inhibited vinylidene chloride is dried by azeo-
tropic distillation and sent to a finishing column where purified
vinylidene  chloride is withdrawn and  stored.   More inhibitor may
be added prior to storage (2).  Figure 1 is  a flow diagram showing
the production and purification of vinylidene chloride  (2, 5).
       INHIBITOR
                                                               WASTE WATER
 1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE
                                     FINISHED VINYLIDENE
                                     CHLORIDE TO STORAGE I
                              RECYCLE 1,1,2 - TRICHLOROETHANE
                                                     •PURGE
    Figure  1.   Flow diagram showing the  production and puri-
                fication of vinylidene  chloride (2, 5).

              Vinyl and Diene Monomers, Copyright (C)  1971.
            Reprinted by permission of John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
USES

It is estimated that 70% of the VDC produced by PPG Industries is
used captively  to make 1,1,1-trichloroethane.   Dow Chemical also
captively uses  about 78% of its VDC in polymer synthesis  (6).
The remaining VDC (18 x 103 metric tons/yr)  is marketed to a
variety of  secondary users.
(5) Shelton,  L.  G.,  D.  E. Hamilton and  R.  H.  Fisackerly.  Vinyl
    and Vinylidene  Chloride.  In:  Vinyl  and  Diene Monomers,
    Part 3, Volume  24.   E. C. Leonard,  ed.  Wiley, Interscience,
    New York,  New York, 1971.  pp. 1205-1282.

(6) Landau, E.,  and N.  E. Manos.  Epidemiology Studies, Task IV
    Vinylidene Chloride.  EPA-560/6-76-022, U.S.  Environmental
    Protection Agency,  Washington, D.C.,  August 1976.  128 pp.

                                  8

-------
VDC is consumed in the production  of  films/  fibers,  plastics,  and
paper coatings  (7).  The manufacture  of  polyvinylidene  copolymers
is the major use of VDC.  The extruded films of  the  copolymers
are used in packaging and have excellent resistance  to  water
vapor and most gases  (1).  The chief  copolymer is  Saran (poly-
vinylidene chloride/vinyl chloride),  a transparent film used for
food packaging.  The films shrink  when exposed to  higher than
normal temperatures.  This characteristic is advantageous in the
heat-shrinking of overwraps on packaged  goods and  in the sealing
of the wraps  (1).  Recent growth in the  production of shrinkable
bags from the VDC copolymer, vinyl chloride/VDC/vinyl chloride,
has been noted.  These bags are used  in  the  meat packaging
industry.

VDC has a wide application as a barrier  coating for  paper and
plastic films.  Saran latexes have been  developed  which  form an
extremely water-resistant coating.  This  coating also provides
the heat-seal characteristics of Saran.   Other applications of
these latexes include mixing in cement to produce  high-strength
mortars and concretes, and as binders for paints and nonwoven
fabrics providing both water resistance  and  nonflammability (1).

VDC polymer lacquers are also used in coating films and paper.
The lacquers are used mainly in food packaging where the features
of inertness, lack of odor or taste, and  nontoxicity are needed.
The lacquers have also been applied as interior coatings for ship
tanks, railroad tank cars, fuel storage tanks, and for the coat-
ing of steel piles and structures.  The chemical resistance and
good adhesion of the lacquers have made them an excellent long-
term coating.  The adhesive property also makes the lacquers a
good binder for oxide pigmented coatings  of magnetic tapes (1).

VDC is used to produce fibers.  Monofilaments, made by extruding
the copolymer, are used in the textile industry as furniture and
automobile upholstery, drapery fabric, outdoor furniture,
venetian-blind tape, and filter cloths (1).  VDC is also used as
a comonomer in the production of some modacrylic fibers such as
Eastman Chemicals' Verel® and Monsanto's  SEF® (1).

VDC copolymer plastics are produced by molding and extrusion of
copolymer resins.   The products provide chemical resistance and
long service life.  Uses of the plastics  include gasoline fil-
ters, valves, pipe fittings, containers,   chemical process equip-
ment, tubing, and pipe liners (1).

Table 6 lists companies utilizing VDC for various ends  (6).   The
total amount of VDC available for  these uses  is 18 x 103 metric
tons/yr.  Plant locations where vinylidene chloride is processed
are shown in Figure 2.

(7) Chemical Origins and Markets,  Fifth Edition.   G. M.  Lawler,
    ed.  Chemical Information Services, Menlo Park,  California,
    1977.  118 pp.

-------
  TABLE  6.   CONSUMPTION AND  END  USE OF VINYLIDENE CHLORIDE  (1974)  (6)
Product
PVDC3 latex
PVDC latex
PVDC synthetic fibers
PVDC-coated cellophane
Extruded PVDC products
Company
Dewey and Almy Chemical
Morton Chemical Co.
BASF - Wyandotte
Staley Chemical
Dow Chemical
Olin
DuPont
Dow Chemical
Goodrich chemical
Rohm and Haas
Standard Brands Chemical Industries
National Starch and Chemical Corp.
Tennessee Eastman
Monsanto Co.
American Cyanamid
DuPont
Olin
FMC
Cryovac
Oscar Meyer
Dow Chemical
American Can Co.
Amtech, Inc.
Onion Carbide Corp.
Location
Owensboro, KV
Ringwood , IL
South Keamy, NJ
Lemont , IL
Midland, MI
Pisgah Forest, NC
Circleville, OH
Midland, MI
Allans Point, CT
Dal ton, GA
Freeport, TX
Avon Lake, OH
Knoxville, TN
Bristol, PA
Cheswold, DE
Kensington, GA
Merdosia, IL
Kingsport, TN
Decatur, AL
Pensacola, FL
Richmond , VA
Clinton, IA
Tecumseh, KS
Pisgah Forest, NC
Covington , IN
Fredricksburg, VA
Marcus Hooks, PA
Simpsonville, SC
Cedar Rapids, IA
Camarillo, CA
Iowa Park, TX
Madison, WI
Chicago, IL
Davenport, IA
Philadelphia, PA
Nashville, TN
Vernon, CA
Midland, HI
Cleveland, OH
Odenton, MD
Centerville, IA
Capacity,
metric tons/yr
4,500
1,600
830
830
830
200
200
TOTAL 8,990
6,800
_b
TOTAL 13,600
TOTAL
TOTAL
TOTAL 20,000
Amount of
vinylidene chloride
monomer used,
metric tons/yr
4,000
1,400
750
750
750
180
180
8,010
3,400
6,800
2,000
-
-
End use
Barrier coatings {coatings for
glassines, paper, paperboard,
polypropylene , and polyester
film)
Miscellaneous applications
Fabrication
Fabrication
Fabrication
Polyvinylidene chloride.
Dashes indicate data unknown.

-------
Figure 2.  Geographic distribution of plants that process vinylidene chloride.

-------
                            SECTION 4

          ENVIRONMENTAL SIGNIFICANCE AND HEALTH EFFECTS
ENVIRONMENTAL SIGNIFICANCE

Emissions arise during the production, use, and transportation of
VDC.  One estimate indicates that 1.8 x 103 metric tons of VDC
were lost to the air in 1974  (2).  A more recent publication
states that 1 x 103 metric tons  are released per year  (3).

VDC Emissions During Production

Process points where VDC emissions occur include vents from the
separator, finishing column, recycling tower, and storage tanks.
VDC can be emitted from process  wastewater and fugitive sources.
Air from process vents may contain up to 5% VDC monomer.  Possi-
ble fugitive and wastewater sources include 1) loading, unload-
ing, and storage of VDC; 2) leaks from pumps, compressors,
valves, and agitators; 3) pipe and equipment flanges and manhole
cover seals; 4) opening equipment for inspection and maintenance;
5) sampling for laboratory analysis; 6) VDC in process water
exposed to atmosphere; and 7) manual venting of equipment  (2).

It has been estimated that 1.5 x 103 metric tons of VDC are
emitted annually during production, principally through purifi-
cation and recycle vents.  This  estimate, however, assumes there
is no use of control technology, and therefore should be con-
sidered as an upper bound  (2).

The heavy ends, composed of phenolic inhibitor and unreacted
1,1,2-trichloroethane, are removed from the finishing column  and
processed through a recycle tower  (2).  Phenolic inhibitor and
1,1,2-trichloroethane are drawn  off and recycled while tower
bottoms are disposed of as waste.  Wastewater streams are dis-
charged from the reactor, separator, and recycling tower  (2).
Effluent streams are also produced during tank car and storage
tank washings.

Product Storage and Transportation

Vinylidene chloride is stored in the absence of light at -10°C
and 69 kPa (2).  Storage tanks are lined with nickel, baked
phenolic, or glass, since the monomer may be corrosive or


                                 12

-------
unstable when contacted with steel  (2).  A  layer of nitrogen  is
placed over the monomer to prevent  contact  with air or water
which may cause undesirable polymerization.

Vinylidene chloride is transported  by  tank  cars, tank trucks  and
barges  (2).  Jumbo tank cars, having 76 m3  capacities, are the
most common means of transport.

Pollution Potential from VDC Consumption and Use

PPG Industries, Inc., hydrochlorinates VDC  to produce methyl
chloroform.  The reaction is represented as (8):

                    CH2=CC12 + HC1  -> CH3CC13

This reaction is ideally conducted  in  the liquid phase with a
catalyst such as ferric chloride.   The reaction is carried out at
25°C to 30°C under slightly superatmospheric pressure.  The pro-
duct is continuously removed from the  hydrochlorination step  and
is purified by fractional distillation, then dried, and stabi-
lizers  added to make it suitable for commercial use  (8).  Poten-
tial sources of gaseous VDC emissions  exist throughout the
process.  Wastewater streams are also  produced which may contain
VDC and other materials.

The polymerization of VDC is another source of emissions.  Both
emulsion and suspension addition polymerization processes are
used to produce polyvinylidene chloride latex and resin.
Figures 3 and 4 give block diagrams for Saran resin production by
the emulsion and suspension processes. VDC emissions arise at
all steps of the polymerization.  In both processes, the VDC
monomer is washed to remove the inhibitor.  During the reaction,
the material is agitated.  When the reaction is complete, the
residual monomer is removed by flashing in  vertical tanks and
steam stripping in single or multiple  stages.  Fugitive emissions
of the  monomer may occur from leaks in equipment, agitators,
vents,  valves, and rupture discs.   A liquid waste stream results
from water-washing of the monomer feedstock to remove the
inhibitor.  The wastewater loading  for polyvinylidene chloride
is estimated to be 4.2 m3/metric ton product.  Additional liquid
waste may result from leaks in the  equipment.  Another source of
emissions is the cleaning of the reactors,  accomplished by
removal of solid deposits or by washing down the side with
solvent or high-pressure steam  (2).

In the  drying stage of these processes, gaseous emissions of
VDC and other low boiling compounds may result.  Wastewater is
produced from the dryers containing VDC and chemical additives.
 (8) Faith,  Keyes,  and Clark's Industrial Chemicals,  Fourth
    Edition.   F. A.  Lowenheim and M.  K.  Movan,  eds.   John Wiley
    and  Sons,  New  York,  New York, 1975.   pp.  837-838.

                                13

-------
           VENT
                                        VENT
       MONOMER STORAGE
       AND PURIFICATION
POLYMERIZATION
                              -VENT
                        MONOMER
                        RECOVERY
                                          •VENT
  Figure  3.    Saran emulsion process  (2).
                    VENT
                                    VENT
Figure  4.   Saran  suspension process  (2)
                        14

-------
In the suspension addition process, contaminated wastewater
streams are produced from the centrifugation and filtration oper-
ations.  Particulate emissions may arise from dusting in the
dryers.  In the final product preparation using suspension addi-
tion polymerization, the devolatilization procedure may cause
gaseous emissions of VDC.  Particulates may be emitted from
pelletizing and bagging.  Also, the extrusion of the polymer may
produce a wastewater stream from quenching  (2).  There are no
estimates of the levels of unreacted monomer emitted in the
polymerization process.  However, one EPA report estimates that
as much as 25% of the VDC used in any given Saran production run
is disposed of in landfill mainly in polymerized form (2).

Table 7 summarizes the estimated annual emissions of VDC from
various sources in the United States.

       TABLE 7.  ESTIMATED ANNUAL EMISSIONS OF VINYLIDENE
                 CHLORIDE IN THE UNITED STATES (2)

                                              VDC emissions,
     	Source	metric tons/yr

     Monomer synthesis                           l,500h
                                                   280

     Polymer synthesis:

       Latex for burner coatings                    54
       Latex for miscellaneous coatings             68
       Synthetic fibres                             73
       Coating resin for cellophane                 82
       Extrusion resin  (emulsion)                   12
       Extrusion resin  (suspension)                 18

     TOTAL                                         308

     Fabrication polymer processing:

       Coating cellophane       ,                     0.7
       Coating plastics, paper and glassine          7.4
       Extrusion                                     °-2
       Miscellaneous coating
     TOTAL                                          14
                                                      Q
     TOTAL                                       1,840


     Emissions  using  an  existing  control  technology.

     bEmissions  reflecting  new  control  technology at PPG
      plant  by late  1975.

     CTotal  of uncontrolled emissions.
                                15

-------
Population at Risk

Worker exposure has generally not been monitored in the past.
Tests have shown that 20,000 ppm can easily be reached in the
proximity of a spill.  In some cases, past worker exposures to
VDC may have exceeded those of vinyl chloride, which were
measured at 300 ppm to 1,000 ppm before OSHA limits were imposed
(6) .

To estimate the number of persons who may be exposed to VDC emis-
sions, the population in a 5-mile radius around each plant listed
in Table 6 and Table 5 has been determined (6).  Approximately
3.5 million persons reside within this area near plants which
either synthesize or polymerize VDC and/or fabricate materials
based on VDC (Table 8) (6).

      TABLE 8.   ESTIMATED POPULATION AROUND VDC PLANTS (6)
                                      Number of
                  	Process	persons

                  Monomer synthesis      89,000
                  Polymer synthesis     605,000
                  Fabrication         2,880,000

                  TOTAL               3,574,000
HEALTH EFFECTS

Exposure to either vapor or liquid VDC may be harmful.  VDC has a
moderate vapor toxicity (9).   The exposure to high vapor concen-
trations of VDC results mainly in central nervous system depres-
sion and the associated symptoms of drunkenness.  VDC has a
characteristic mild, sweet odor resembling carbon tetrachloride
or chloroform.  A definite odor can be detected by most people
at 1,000 ppm in air although some people detect the odor at
500 ppm.  A disagreeable odor can be detected in vapors contain-
ing decomposition products at less than 500 ppm  (9).

The odor or irritating property is usually inadequate to warn of
overexposure.  A drunkenness is rapidly produced with a single
exposure of a few minutes to a high concentration of VDC (in the
order of 4,000 ppm).  Continued exposure at this concentration
(9)  Irish, D. C.  Aliphatic Halogenated Hydrocarbons.  In:
    Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology, D. W. Fassett and D. D.
    Irish, Eds.  Interscience Publishers, New York, New York,
    1962.   pp. 1305-1307.

                              16

-------
may cause unconsciousness.  Prompt and complete recovery from
the anesthetic effects is usually observed if the exposure is
of short duration.  Prolonged exposure or repeated short-term
exposures may be dangerous even if the vapor concentrations are
too low to cause drunkenness.  Organic injury may occur to the
kidneys and liver.  It has been recommended that the vapor con-
centration of VDC be below a time-weighted average of 25 ppm for
repeated exposures  (8 hr/day, 5 days/wk).  Injury should not
result from a single exposure of about 1,000 ppm for up to one
hour or 200 ppm for up to eight hours  (1).

Liquid VDC is irritating to the skin and eyes.  Skin irritation
has been noted after only a few minutes of contact; prolonged
contact can cause first degree burns  (2).  This irritation may be
partially due to the inhibitor  (MEHQ or phenol) used in VDC to
prevent polymerization.

Injury from skin absorption of the amount of phenol used in
inhibited VDC appears to be unlikely.  Inhibited VDC is moder-
ately irritating to the eyes and will cause pain and conjunctival
irritation and, possibly, some transient corneal injury and
iritis  (2).

VDC has recently been reported to cause liver impairment.  At
the BASF Wyandotte VDC polymerization plant in South Kearny,
New Jersey, 27 of 46 workers examined showed 50% or greater loss
in liver function.  Other examinations indicate that VDC is
biochemically altered in the body and may form intermediates
similar to the cancer-producing metabolites of vinyl chloride
 (10).

VDC is a suspected carcinogen  (3).  Inhaled VDC is reported to
produce liver tumors in rats at 200 ppm.  Inhalation experiments
with animals showed that VDC causes liver and kidney damage.
When rats were pre-exposed to vinyl chloride and then tested with
VDC, the acute toxicity of VDC was greatly enhanced.  Concurrent
exposure with vinyl chloride reduces the acute effects and may
potentiate the carcinogenic effects.  This is important because
a significant part of polymer production involves the use of
both chemicals  (2).  Acute toxicity data is given in Table 9.
 (10) Summary Characteristics  of  Selected Chemicals  of Near-Term
     Interest.  EPA-560/4-76-004 (PB-253 817), U.S.  Environmental
     Protection Agency, Washington,  D.C., April  1976.   50  pp.

                               17

-------
   TABLE 9.  ACUTE TOXICITY OF VINYLIDENE CHLORIDE (3)

Lowest toxicitya
Lethal dose


Lethal concentration
Dosage
3,700 mg/kg
5,750 mg/kg
225 mg/kg
10,000 ppm
Animal
Rabbit
Dog
Dog
Rat
Route
Subcutaneous
Oral
Intravenous
Inhalation

a
 Known to cause death.
                            18

-------
                            SECTION  5

                       CONTROL TECHNOLOGY
WORKSPACE ENVIRONMENT

Vinylidene chloride  is a toxic and volatile chemical requiring
careful handling and storage during its synthesis or polymeriza-
tion.  To avoid worker exposure to VDC, spills should be cleaned
up immediately, equipment periodically inspected, and leaks
repaired  (11).

There are no  specific government regulations concerning VDC
emissions from monomer synthesis or processing.  Several methods
are available, however, to control vinylidene chloride emissions
during monomer production, storage, and transportation.  The ef-
ficiencies and costs of the control methods described were not
available for this report.

PROCESS VENTS

Vents are located on the separator, finishing columns, recycling
tower, and storage tanks of a VDC production facility (2).  VDC
emissions are ducted from the vents to activated carbon adsorbers
where VDC is  removed.  Industry has not found it economically
feasible to regenerate spent carbon thus requiring its disposal
as a waste product.

VDC RECOVERY

Vinylidene chloride  can be recovered from gas purging operations
by refrigerated solvent scrubbing  (2).  Solvents which have been
used for this control technique are acetone, methyl ethyl ketone,
ethylene dichloride, butyl acetate and heptyl butyl ketone.
Recovered vinylidene chloride is returned to the process system
while the purge gases are being cleaned of VDC.

ORGANIC. WASTE INCINERATION

Incinerators are generally used to dispose of flammable liquid
wastes produced during VDC synthesis  (2).  Process air streams
(11) Vinylidene Chloride Monomer, Physical Properties and Han-
     dling Precautions.  Dow Chemical Company, Coatings Technical
     Service, Midland, Michigan.
                                19

-------
may be vented to the incinerator to control hydrocarbon
emissions.

STORAGE TANK EMISSIONS

Emissions from storage tanks may be controlled by other refrig-
erated vent recovery systems or by venting storage tank emissions
to the main process stream.  Vinylidene chloride is then recov-
ered and the inerts are removed along with production wastes  (2).
                  »
CURRENT INDUSTRY EFFORTS

The VDC industry is adopting control procedures for vinylidene
chloride which parallel those for vinyl chloride (2).  The type
of control technology used in controlling vinyl chloride emis-
sions could be applicable to VDC.  Suggested control measures
for VDC from existing vinyl chloride technology are given in the
following paragraphs.

The emissions from pump, compressor, and agitator seals can be
controlled by installing double mechanical seals and maintaining
a liquid between the seals at sufficient pressure to cause the
liquid to leak into the pump should the seal fail.

VDC that is present in equipment that is to be opened for main-
tenance or inspection can be vented to a control device by
purging the equipment with an inert gas such as nitrogen or
displacing the contents with water before it is opened.

The emissions occurring during loading and unloading from the
loading area lines can be controlled by purging the lines to a
control device such as an incinerator or carbon adsorption unit.
The emissions from slip gauges can also be vented to a control
device.

Emissions from leaking pressure relief valves can be reduced by
installing leak proof rupture discs upstream of the relief
valve.

Emissions resulting from sampling for laboratory analysis can be
virtually eliminated by letting the gas that is to be sampled
flow through the sample flask to a lower pressure point in the
process.  The sample flask can then be blocked off and any VDC
that remains in the sample lines can be purged to a control
device before the sample flask is removed.

Many fugitive sources can be monitored with a formal program of
leak detection and repair.  The detection can be accomplished
with both fixed point and portable monitoring devices.  Using
methods described above, fugitive emissions could be reduced
by 90%.
                               20

-------
VDC can be stripped from the inprocess wastewater, and transfer-
red to a control device, such as an incinerator or adsorber; VDC
could possibly be recovered from the adsorber.

VDC that is present in the polymerization reactors can be dis-
placed to the monomer recovery system for reuse by filling the
reactor with water before it is opened for cleaning, maintenance,
or inspection.

The need to open the reactors for cleaning can be reduced by
cleaning the reactor while it is closed with high pressure water
sprays, circulating an organic solvent through the reactor to
dissolve any solids that may have accumulated and by a combina-
tion of recipe reformulation and reactor design to reduce scale
formation.

Polymerization reactor safety valve discharges can be avoided
by instrumenting each reactor with a pressure or temperature
alarm to alert the operator to take appropriate action.  This
could include venting the reactor contents to a gasholder where
the VDC can be recycled, or injecting certain chemicals into the
reactor to stop the reaction and prevent further pressure build-
up.  During power failure, these chemicals could be added manu-
ally by hydraulic injection systems.

VDC that is present in all captive or point sources in the
monomer and polymer plants can be controlled by adsorption on
activated carbon, by absorption in an organic solvent, or by
incineration.  For vinyl chloride, each of these techniques can
reduce the vinyl chloride content of the gas being treated to
less than 10 ppm.

Control levels equivalent to the "add-on" devices discussed
above can be achieved in certain point sources in the polymeriza-
tion process by stripping the slurry leaving the reactors of the
residual, unreacted VDC.  These sources, which are downstream
of the stripper, include the slurry blend tanks, the centrifuges,
the dryers, and the bulk resin storage areas.
        i
It is difficult to estimate the emissions reduction and costs of
these control strategies as applied to VDC.  Control test data
and cost estimates for vinyl chloride are available in EPA's
publication on the Emission Standard for Vinyl Chloride (12).
 (12) Standard Support and Environmental Impact Statement:  Emis-
     sion Standard for Vinyl Chloride.  EPA-450/2-75-009, U.S.
     Environmental Protection Agency, 1975.  536 pp.


                               21

-------
                            SECTION 6

                 REGULATORY ACTIONS IN PROGRESS
The American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists has
established a threshold limit value of 10 ppm  (13).  Vinylidene
chloride has recently been reported to cause liver impairment.
Workers examined at the BASF Wyandotte VDC polymerization plant
in South Kearny, New Jersey showed a 50% or greater loss in liver
function.  Other studies have indicated that VDC is biochemically
altered in the body and may form intermediates similar to the
cancer-producing metabolites of vinyl chloride (10).

NIOSH is planning to monitor the follow-up studies on workers at
the South Kearny BASF plant and will survey other VDC production
sites in 1977 to determine if a workplace standard should be
recommended  (10).

EPA is preparing an assessment of the air pollution problems
associated with VDC production and use.  Fetotoxicity and embryo-
toxicity have been demonstrated under EPA-funded contracts.  Data
on environmental effects of VDC are also being obtained (10).

A preliminary air pollution assessment of VDC indicates that
regulation under Sections 111 and 112 of the Clean Air Act is
not warranted at this time (14).   VDC has been designated as a
priority pollutant for study under the Federal Water Pollution
Control Act.
(13)  TLV's® Threshold Limit Values for Chemical Substances and
     Physical Agents in the Workroom Environment with Intended
     Changes for 1975.  American Conference of Governmental
     Industrial Hygienists.  Cincinnati, Ohio, 1975.  97 pp.

(14)  Identification of Selected Federal Activities Directed to
     Chemicals of Near-term Concern.  EPA-560/4-76-006, U.S.
     Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C., July
     1976.   36 pp.
                               22

-------
                            REFERENCES


 1.  Kirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology, Second
     Edition, Volume 21.  John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York,
     New York, 1970.  pp. 275-279.

 2.  Hushon, J. and M. Kornreich.  Air Pollution Assessment of
     Vinylidene Chloride.   MTR-7230.  U.S. Environmental Protec-
     tion Agency, Research  Triangle Park, North Carolina,
     May 1976.  73 pp.

 3.  Dorigan J.  Scoring of Organic Air Pollutants:  Chemistry,
     Production, and Toxicity of Selected Synthetic Organic
     Chemicals.  Mitre Corporation, September 1976.

 4.  Sherwood, P. W.  Raw Materials for Plastics and Resins.
     Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, 54(12):30, 1962.

 5.  Shelton, L. G., D. E.  Hamilton and R. H. Fisackerly.  Vinyl
     and Vinylidene Chloride.  In:  Vinyl and Diene Monomers,
     Part 3, Volume 24.  E. C. Leonard, ed.  Wiley, Interscience,
     New York, New York, 1971.  pp. 1205-1282.

 6.  Landau, E., and N. E.  Manos.  Epidemiology Studies, Task IV
     Vinylidene Chloride.   EPA-560/6-76-022, U.S. Environmental
     Protection Agency, Washington, D.C., August 1976.   128 pp.

 7.  Chemical Origins and Markets, Fifth Edition.  G. M. Lawler,
     ed.  Chemical Information Services, Menlo Park, California,
     1977.  118 pp.

 8.  Faith, Keyes, and Clark's Industrial Chemicals, Fourth
     Edition.  F. A. Lowenheim and M. K. Movan, eds.  John Wiley
     and Sons, New York, New York, 1975.  pp 837-838.

 9.  Irish, D. D.  Aliphatic Halogenated Hydrocarbons.   In:
     Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology, D. W. Fassett and D. D.
     Irish, Eds.   Interscience Publishers, New York, New York,
     1962.  pp. 1305-1307.

10.  Summary Characteristics of Selected Chemicals of Near-Term
     Interest.  EPA-560/4-76-004 (PB-253 817), U.S. Environmental
     Protection Agency, Washington, D.C., April 1976.  50 pp.
                                23

-------
11.  Vinylidene Chloride Monomer, Physical Properties and
     Handling Precautions.  Dow Chemical Company, Coatings Tech-
     nical Service, Midland, Michigan.

12.  Standard Support and Environmental Impact Statement:  Emis-
     sion Standard for Vinyl Chloride.  EPA-450/2-75-009. U.S.
     Environmental Protection Agency, 1975.  536 pp.

13.  TLV's® Threshold Limit Values for Chemical Substances and
     Physical Agents in the Workroom Environment with Intended
     Changes for 1975.  American Conference of Governmental Indus-
     trial Hygienists.  Cincinnati, Ohio, 1975.  97 pp.

14.  Identification of Selected Federal Activities Directed to
     Chemicals of Near-term Concern.  EPA-560/4-76-006, U.S.
     Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C., July 1976.
     36 pp.
                                24

-------
                                    TECHNICAL REPORT DATA
                            (riease read Instructions on the reverse before completing)
  REPORT NO.
  EPA-600/2-79-2100
                  3. RECIPIENT'S ACCESSION-NO.
4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE
Status Assessment  of Toxic Chemicals:
Vinylidene
  Chloride
                  5. REPORT DATE
                    December 1979 issuing date
                  6. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE
  AUTHOR(S)
 T.R.  Blackwood,  D.R.  Tierney
 M.R.  Piana
                  8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NO.
9. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS
Monsanto Research Corp          Radian Corp
1515 Nichols Road               8500 Shoal Creek  Blvd
Dayton, Ohio    ^07            P.O. Box 99^8
	Austin, Texas   78766
                  10. PROGRAM ELEMENT NO.
                  11. CONTRACT/GRANT NO.


                     68-03-2550
12. SPONSORING AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS
Industrial Environmental Research La"b«
Office of Research and Development
U.S.  Environmental Protection Agency
Cinr-lnnat.T . Ohio
-  Cinn,  OH
                  13. TYPE OF REPORT AND PERIOD COVERED
                     Task  Final  11/77 - 12/77
                  14. SPONSORING AGENCY CODE
                        EPA/600/12
 15. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES
 lERL-Ci project  leader for this  report is Dr. Charles Frank,
 16. ABSTRACT
             This report details the uses and the  technology employed to control
             emissions of vinylidene chloride.   Data on vinylidene  chloride
             emissions and their sources are given,  as well as information dealing
             with the effects  of exposure to vinylidene chloride.   Finally, regula-
             tory actions and  areas requiring further study are  outlined.
17.
                                 KEY WORDS AND DOCUMENT ANALYSIS
                  DESCRIPTORS
                                               b.lDENTIFIERS/OPEN ENDED TERMS
                                   COS AT I Field/Group
 Vinylidene Chloride copolymers,  Vinylidene
 Chloride resins, Polyvinylidene  Chloride,
 Saran®, Vinylidene resins, Addition resins,
 Thermoplastic  resins, vinyl  resins
       Ethylene dichloride
    68A
    68G
18. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT

    Release  to Public
     19. SECURITY CLASS (ThisReport)
        Unclassified
21. NO. OF PAGES

     33
                                               20. SECURITY CLASS (Thispage)
                                                  Unclassified
                                 22. PRICE
EPA Form 2220-1 (9-73)
                                                                    ft U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1980 -657-146/5514

-------