EPA-R3-73-042

MAY 1Q71                       Ecological Research Series
IVI n I I 3 / U
Interaction between


Marine  Organisms and Oil Pollution
                        vS

                                 Office of Research and Monitoring


                                 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency


                                 Washington, D.C. 20460

-------
            RESEARCH REPORTING SERIES
Research reports of the  Office  of  Research  and
Monitoring,  Environmental Protection Agency, have
been grouped into five series.  These  five  broad
categories  were established to facilitate further
development  and  application   of   environmental
technology.   Elimination  of traditional grouping
was  consciously  planned  to  foster   technology
transfer   and  a  maximum  interface  in  related
fields.  The five series are:

   1.  Environmental Health Effects Research
   2.  Environmental Protection Technology
   3.  Ecological Research
   4.  Environmental Monitoring
   5.  socioeconomic Environmental Studies

This report has been assigned  to  the  ECOLOGICAL
RESEARCH  series.   This series describes research
on the effects of pollution on humans,  plant  and
animal   species,  and  materials.   Problems  are
assessed   for   their   long-   and    short-term
influences.    Investigations  include  formation,
transport* and pathway studies  to  determine  the
fate  of  pollutants and their effects.  This work
provides the technical basis for setting standards
to  minimize   undesirable   changes   in   living
organisms   in   the   aquatic,   terrestrial  and
atmospheric environments.

-------
                                                EPA-R3-73-042
                                                May 1973
         INTERACTION  BETWEEN MARINE  ORGANISMS AND

                       OIL POLLUTION
                             by

                      Dr.  Max Blumer
                      Dr.  John M. Hunt
                      Dr.  Jelle Atema
                      Lauren Stein
               Project  #18050 and 18080 EBN
                      Project Officer

                      Dr.  C. S. Hegre
         National Marine  Water Quality Laboratory
             Environmental Protection Agency
                       P.  0. Box 277
            West Kingston, Rhode Island  02892
                       Prepared  for

           OFFICE OF RESEARCH AND MONITORING
         U. S.  ENVIRONMENTAL  PROTECTION AGENCY
              WASHINGTON, D.C.   20460
For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 20402
               Price $1.26 domestic postpaid or $1 QPO Bookstore

-------
              EPA Review Notice
This report has been reviewed by the Water
Quality Office, EPA, and approved for publication.
Approval does not signify that the contents
necessarily reflect the views and policies of
the Environmental Protection Agency, nor does
mention of trade names or commercial products
constitute endorsement or recommendation for
use.

-------
                               ABSTRACTS


                                 PART I

                INTERACTION  BETWEEN MARINE  ORGANISMS AND

                             OIL POLLUTION

  The present work has established the following:

  I.   Hydrocarbons in uncontaminated living plants  and  animals  differ
  in  structure and molecular weight distribution from the  hydrocarbons
  in  fossil  fuels.  We have  established criteria and methods  that
  permit the detection of hydrocarbons from fossil  fuels in the presence *
  of  biogenic hydrocarbons and vice versa.

 II.   Hydrocarbons are remarkably stable  in marine  sediments  and in  the
  lipids of  marine organisms, even chemically  reactive  hydrocarbons  can
  move unaltered through several trophic  levels  in  the  marine food web.
  Degradation and dispersal  eventually proceeds  by  physical (evaporation,
  dissolution), by chemical  (oxidation, polymerization) and by  bio-
  chemical  (metabolism) processes.

III.   There  is now ample evidence for the importance of chemical communi-
  cation between marine organisms, both with inter- and intraspecific
  message systems.  Our work shows again  that  only  very low concentrations
  of  organic stimuli are required for communication.  Consequently,  such
  processes  appear especially prone to interference by  pollutants at low
  concentration levels.

  This report was submitted  in fulfillment of project  #18050 EBN under
  the sponsorship of the Water Quality Office, Environmental  Protection
  Agency.


                                 PART II

               SUBLETHAL EFFECTS OF CRUDE OIL  ON LOBSTER,

                      CHQMARUS AMERICANUS)  BEHAVIOR

  Small  quantities of crude  oil (0.9 milliliters in 100 liters  of sea-
  water) interfere with some specific, possibly  chemosensory, behavior
  of  the lobster, Homarus americanus. Timing  of their  feeding  behavior
  showed that the delay period between noticing  food and going  after it

-------
doubles when oil was added.  The water soluble fraction of this  crude
oil alone (in the 50 ppb range) does not have a noticeable effect on
behavior and feeding times.  Morphological  changes in odor receptors
after oil exposure were not detected by light and electron microscopy.
The results indicate that small quantities  of oil mixed into seawater
constitute a noxious, bad smell in the lobsters environment, depressing
his appetite and chemical excitability.

Chemical analyses showed that before the addition of oil  a great quan-
tity of lipids was present in the test aquaria.  When the water  was
brought in contact with an oil slick, the lipid concentration dropped
considerably.  The same effect was seen in  the alkane and the alkene-
aromatic hydrocarbon fractions.  The fate of oil in seawater followed
the usual degradation pattern.

This report was submitted in fulfillment of project #18080 EBN  under
the sponsorship of the Water Quality Office, Environmental Protection
Agency.
                                 iv

-------
                              CONTENTS
Section
  I
  II
  III
  IV
  V
  VI
  VII
  VIII
  IX
  X
  Section
  I
  II
  III
  IV
  V
  VI
  VII
  VIII
  IX
  X
              PART I                       Page
Conclusions                                  1
Recommendations                              2
Introduction                                 3
Identification of Oil Pollution              5
Fate and Persistence of Oil Pollution        8
Marine Chemotaxis                           10
Acknowledgements                            14
References                                  15
Publications                                16
Appendix - Species List                     20
             PART II                       Page
Conclusions                                 25
Recommendations                             27
Introduction                                29
Methods                                     31
Results                                     41
Discussion                                  65
Acknowledgements                            69
References                                  70
Pending Publication                         71
Appendices                                  72

-------
                             FIGURES
Number                                                        Page
  1        Connection of oil  slick tank  and  lobster aquaria     35
          in solubles experiment.
  2        Flow chart of chemical  analyses.                      38
  3        Appearance of oil  slick over  five day  period,         43
          first series of solubles experiment.
  4        Appearance of oil  slick over  five day  period,         44
          second series of solubles experiment.
  5        Gas chromatograms  of pentane  extract from oil-        45
          water mixture.
  6        Ultraviolet spectra of  lipid  extracts  of solubles     47
          on days 5-10.
  7        Ultraviolet spectra of  alkene-aromatic fraction       48
          of day 10 and of whole  crude  oil.
  8        Gas chromatograms of alkane fraction of solubles.     52 & 53
  9.       Gas chromatograms  of alkene-aromatic fraction of     54
          solubles.
 10        Antennule with aesthetasc hairs and guard hairs.      56
 11        Antennule in vivo (150x, light microscopy).           57
 12        Detail of tip of aesthetasc hair  in vivo (1500x,      58
          light microscopy).
 13        Detail of base of aesthetasc  hair in vivo            59
          (1500x, light microscopy).
 14        Aesthetasc hair details (scanning electron           60
          microscopy).
          a)  Tip, head-on view
          b)  Distal 1/3 portion
          c)  Base, head on view, with  pores in  antennule
 15        Cross section of middle portion of aesthetasc         61
          hair (12,000x,  electron microscopy).
 16        Detail of cuticle of Figure 15  (45,000x)             62
          electron microscopy).
 17        Detail of dendrites inside aesthetasc  hair           63
          middle portion (33,000x, electron microscopy).
 18        Detail of dendrites inside aesthetasc  hair middle     64
          portion (29,000x,  electron microscopy).

                               vi

-------
                             TABLES
Number                                                     Page
  1            Selected behavior units used in analysis.      33
  2            Frequency of occurrence for the be-           34
               havior unit - "Crude, Antenna Wave".
  3            Lipid concentrations and hydrocarbon          49
               concentrations in sea water.
  4            Ultraviolet absorbance of lipid extract       50
               of one liter of sea water.
  5            Infrared absorbances, normalized to           55
               2955 cm-1 band.
                              vii

-------
                 PART I
INTERACTION BETWEEN MARINE ORGANISMS AND
             OIL POLLUTION
           Project #18050 EBN

-------
                             SECTION 1

                            CONCLUSIONS

The present work has established the following:

1.  Hydrocarbons in uncontaminated living plants and anihials differ
in structure and molecular weight distribution from the hydrocarbons
in fossil fuels.  We have established criteria and methods that
permit the detection of hydrocarbons from fossil fuels in the pre-
sence of biogenic hydrocarbons and vice versa.

2.  Hydrocarbons are remarkably stable in marine sediments and in
the lipids of marine organisms, even chemically reactive hydrocarbons
can move unaltered through several trophic levels in the marine food
web.  Degradation and dispersal eventually proceeds by physical
(evaporation, dissolution), by chemical (oxidation, polymerization)
and by biochemical (metabolism) processes.

3.  There is now ample evidence for the importance of chemical com-
munication between marine organisms, both with inter- and intraspecific
message systems.  Our work shows again that only very low concentra-
tions of organic stimuli are required for communication.  Consequently,
such processes appear especially prone to interference by pollutants
at low concentration levels.

-------
                             SECTION II

                          RECOMMENDATIONS

1.  This work has established the possibility to distinguish in en-
vironmental  samples between biogenic and petroleum-derived hydrocarbons.
Our baseline data come mostly from the coastal  regions of the Western
North Atlantic and should be extended to other coastal regions.

2.  There are strong suggestions that biogenic hydrocarbons play vital
roles in the life processes of marine organisms.  Therefore, oil pol-
lution may interfere with such processes at very low concentration
levels.  This may be a critical research area.

3.  This work has shown that hydrocarbon pollutants enter the marine
food web.  Earlier work, based on subjective (taste) tests appears
now irrelevant.  The survey for oil  derived hydrocarbons in fisheries
products must be extended to other species  and should be performed
routinely on products that reach the market because of obvious public
health implications.

4.  No guidelines or legal limits exist for the acceptability of oil
pollution in fisheries products.  EPA in cooperation with public
health authorities should establish such limits for the protection
of the consumer.

5.  The case study on the persistence of oil pollution reported here
deals with a fuel oil spill.  Other investigations using similar ob-
jective analytical and biological methods should be carried out with
other oils and in other climatic regions.

6.  Oil pollution may be more damaging through its long term and low
level effects than through the gross esthetic impact.  Research in
the areas of low level toxicity, persistent damage, interference
with chemotaxis or with reproduction has been neglected in the past.
Immediate attention both to basic and applied research in these areas
is needed.

-------
                            SECTION III

                            INTRODUCTION

The goals of our study of marine pollution were summarized in our initial
proposal dated May 27, 1968.

Identification of Oil Pollution

Marine hydrocarbons derive in part from living organisms and in part
from pollution.  We plan to establish sensitive,criteria to distin-
guish hydrocarbons from either source.  This knowledge is essential
if we are to measure in the oceans the spread of the true pollutants
and not of the ubiquitous natural hydrocarbons.

Fate and Persistence of Oil Pollution

Many stable pollutants, especially hydrocarbons, pass through the
marine food chain with little alteration but often with a rise in con-
centration.  We plan to study the persistence and accumulation by marine
organisms, especially human food, of objectionable and hazardous com-
pounds derived from pollution.

Effect of Pollutants on Marine Organisms

Natural compounds in the sea play an important ecological role as
stimuli for the attraction of the sexes, for Inter- and intraspecies
recognition, in the finding of food and in short and long distance
migration.  Marine pollution is likely to interfere with many of
these processes.  Because of the extreme sensitivity of the organisms
to these stimuli, such interference may be more subtle and still have
a more catastrophic long-term effect than the gross toxicity of bulk
pollution.  We plan to study the extent to which marine pollution
interferes with these processes and the concentrations which are harmful.

This work is important for pollution control through the identification
of pollution and in establishing the types of compounds which have to
be controlled and the levels at which they have to be held.
                       I
During the duration of this grant we have defined the natural hydrocarbon
content of a wide variety of marine organisms (8, 11, 17, 19, 24) and
the fate of these hydrocarbons in the marine food chain (.6, 7, 8, 24).
Progress during the first year of the grant period has influenced our
research plan.  A large coastal oil spill near Woods Hole has provided
a testing ground for our concepts (6, 7, 15, 16, 22).  We ha\/e succeeded

-------
in distinguishing the spilled oil  from the natural  hydrocarbon back-
ground (6, 7, T$, 18, 22,  23, 24)  and have shown that the spilled oil
is incorporated into oysters and scallops  (6,  7, 24),  Thus,  the first
and second objectives of the initial  proposal  have  been essentially
achieved and brought to a  field test.  During  the reporting period we
have gained much new information on the environmental behavior and
fate of spilled petroleum.  This is relevant to the problem of oil
spill identification.'

Also, during the granting  period we have gained experience in our
research on the effect of  pollutants  on marine organisms.   As a result,
the research aims have been redefined, and instead  of proceeding as
initially planned for a third year, we are now planning to proceed
along two separate but related lines:  characterization of environmental
oil samples (oil spill identification) and marine chemotaxis.

Progress in the individual areas will be discussed  in the order outlined
in the introduction;  much of the  progress is  documented in publica-
tions (see list, Section XI).

-------
                             SECTION IV

                  IDENTIFICATION OF OIL POLLUTION

Hydrocarbons of recent, biochemical origin are minor but not un-
important components of all marine organisms (8, 11, 17, 19, 21}.
We find a great structural variety between the hydrocarbons of
different organisms.  In spite of their relative complexity, the
biogenic hydrocarbons are easily distinguished from those of fossil
fuels.  We find great differences in the structural types, in the
molecular weight distribution and in the relative predominance of
individual compounds.  This is of obvious relevance to chemotaxonomy,
to the study of chemical transormation in subsurface sediments and
to the differentiation between recent hydrocarbons and fossil fuels
in the environment.

We have paid special attention to:

Hydrocarbons of Marine Phytoplankton

The hydrocarbon contents of 23 species of algae (22 marine planktonic),
belonging to 9 algal classes, were analyzed (17).  The highly un-
saturated 3,6,9,12,15,18-heneicosahexaene predominates in the
Bacillariophyceae, Dinophyceae, Cryptophyceae, Haptophyceae and
Euglenophyceae.  Rhizosolem'a setigera contains n-heneicosane, pre-
sumably derived from the hexaolefin by hydrogenation.  Two isomeric
heptadecenes have been isolated:  the double bond is located in 5-
position in the blue-green algae Synechococcus bacillaris and in 7-
position in 2 green algae.  In all cases, the algae contain relatively
few hydrocarbons, mostly straight chain alkanes and alkenes and some
monomethylalkanes.  Pristane is present, but at a low concentration.
Zooplankton, on the other hand, contains the complex assemblage of
CIQ and C20 isoprenoid alkanes and alkenes which are derived from
phytol (21).  The hydrocarbon composition of ancient sediments and
of petroleum is far more complex; many isomeric compounds belonging to
different homologous series are found, olefins are absent, and ali-
cyclic and aromatic compounds occur at much higher concentrations
than in living organisms.  This work suggests that hydrocarbon analysis
may be a tool for the detection of algal species in mixed plankton
or in mixed algal lipids ingested by certain herbivores.  Also,
detailed hydrocarbon analysis enables the distinction between hydro-
carbons of recent btogenic origin and hydrocarbon pollutants from
fossil fuels.

-------
Hydrocarbons of Benthic Algae

Saturated and olefinic hydrocarbons were determined in 24 species of
green, brown and red benthic marine algae from tKe Cape Cod area
(Massachusetts, USA) (19).  Among the saturated hydrocarbons, n-penta-
decane predominates in the brown and n-heptadecane in the red algae.
A Ci7 aIkylcyclopropane has been identified tentatively in Ulva
lactuca and Enteromorpha cbrhpressa, two species of green algae.  Mono-
and diolefinic Ci5 and C]7 hydrocarbons are common.  The structures of
several new Ci7, CIQ and C2i mono- to hexaolefins have been elucidated
by gas chromatography, mass spectrometry and ozonolysis.  In fruiting
Ascophyllum nodosum, the polyunsaturated hydrocarbons occur exclusively
in the reproductive structures.  The rest of the plant contains n-
alkanes from Ci5 to C2i-  A link between the reproductive chemistry of
benthic and planktonic algae and their olefin content is suggested.

Our analyses of the hydrocarbons in benthic marine algae from coastal
environments should aid studies of the coastal food  web and should
enable us to distinguish between hydrocarbon pollutants and the
natural hydrocarbon background in inshore waters.

An intriguing speculation is based on Paffenhofer's 0970) obser-
vation that the sex ratio of laboratory reared Calanus helgolandicus
depends upon the species of algae fed to the nauplii.  The percentage
of males produced correlates with out analyses of heneicosahexaene
in the algal food.

This and the recent discovery of an olefinic hydrocarbon acting as
male attracting substance in the female gametes of a brown algae by
Mueller and co-workers, suggests specific biochemical roles for hydro-
carbons in marine organisms.  Aside from their scientific implications
these findings suggest the possibility that olefinic hydrocarbons
from cracked fossil fuels might interfere with sensitive biochemical
processes in the sea at concentration levels that have not before
been considered potentially harmful.  Further work in this area seems
urgent.

Fossil Fuels, Methods

We participated in anFAO symposium on the Detection and Monitoring
of Pollutants in the Marine Environment and chaired the Panel on Petro-
leum.   A review of existing methods and a recommendation for further
research has been compiled and published (21).

-------
Characterization of the Water Soluble Fraction of Petroleum

The immediate toxicity of crude oil and oil product arises to a signi-
ficant part from the water soluble fraction of the lower boiling hydro-
carbons.  Characterization of this fast spreading fraction is necessary
and had not been carried out before.  We have analyzed water extracts
of crude oils and of kerosene by gas chromatography and mass spectro-
metry; the aqueous extracts consist predominately of aromatic hydro-
carbons.  Thus, in the 160-260 C boiling range substituted benzenes
and naphthalenes predominate (20).

This work may aid in the identification of crude oil derived hydro-
carbons in organisms and in the water column, especially at some dis-
tance from the spill and it provides the background for toxicity
studies on aqueous oil extracts.

Identification of Mixed Fossil and Biogenic Hydrocarbons

The marine sediments in Buzzards Bay at West Falmouth, Massachusetts
have been contaminated by a fuel oil spill in September 1969 (.6, 7, 15,
16, 22).  The area provides an ideal testing ground for this subject
in view of the gradation between heavy contamination to clean sediment.
We have established that biogenic and fuel derived hydrocarbons can be
detected and determined in each others presence, even when material
from one or the other source predominates strongly (22).

-------
                             SECTION V

                FATE AND PERSISTENCE OF OIL POLLUTION

The Environmental Ageing of Fossil Fuels

The natural alteration of biogenic and fossil hydrocarbon mixtures
proceeds by physical (dissolution, evaporation), by chemical^(oxidation,
polymerization) and by biochemical (metabolic) processes.  Different
processes affect the hydrocarbon composition of e mixture in different
ways and their relative role can be inferred from a chemical analysis.

We are studying the alteration of fossil fuels derived from marine spills
in subtidal and intertidal sediments on the open ocean and in organisms.
In the case of the subtidal sediments (22) the degradation is slow,
and proceeds primarily through biochemical attack and-to a lesser degree
through dissolution.  Oil in intertidal sediments and on the open ocean
is altered primarily by evaporation and dissolution.  In the case of
substantial thickness (tar balls) this affects primarily the outside
layer.  Bacterial degradation of tar balls is negligibly slow; in
beach sands it may proceed more rapidly if a sufficient supply of
oxygen and of nutrients is present.

Work on this topic has begun during the last year of the present grant
and will be pursued at greater intensity in the future project on
Oil Spills Identification.

Hydrocarbons in the Marine Food Web

Earlier work at this laboratory had already established the persistence
of biogenic hydrocarbons in the marine food web.  This has been comple-
mented with further studies both on biogenic and petroleum derived
hydrocarbons.

We have now studied the occurrence of an algal derived hydrocarbon (all-
cis- 3,6,9,12,15,18-heneicosahexaene} in marine animals (8).  This
olefin is accumulated nonselectively by Rhincalanus nasutus from its
algal food together with the triglyceride liptds.  Other related copepods
and other zooplankton species contain little or none of this hydrocarbon,
even when grown in cultures of algae that provide R. nasutus with
that olefin.   The presence of this hydrocarbon in marine vertebrates
shows that mechanisms for  its injection into higher trophic levels,
either via R_. nasutus or other unidentified vectors, exist and that
even such a highly unsaturated and unstable hydrocarbon is stabilized
within animal lipids.
                                 8

-------
The Oil Spill of blest Falrnouth, Massachusetts

This incident has been described  in  published  and  unpublished  reports
C6, 7, 15, 16, 22).  The essential conclusions regarding  persistence,
spread and biological effect  of this oil  spill  remain  the same.   Oil
is still chemically  identifiable  and the  original  animal  populations
have not returned except at the most lightly polluted  marginal  loca-
tions.

Biochemical degradation of the oil has  accelerated during summer  1970
and the straight chain hydrocarbons  have  almost completely disappeared
at some locations.   Branched  and  cyclic hydrocarbons persist and
the original boiling point distribution of the oil has been preserved
remarkably well  (22).

Of special interest  are the analyses at an offshore, subtidal  station
at a considerable distance from shore.  At this station oil from  the
spill did not appear in the sediments until  at least seven months
after the accident.  During the following months the oil  content
of the sediment  increased further and by  September 1970,  one year
after the spill, the contamination reached a level similar to  that
in the originally more polluted stations  closer to shore  (22).

Because of the more  rapid bacterial  degradation of normal paraffins,
ratios of normal to  branched  paraffins  of similar  boiling point are  .
a sensitive measure  of the relative  degree of  biodegradation of an
oil.  In the sediments at West Falmouth,  this  parameter demonstrates
the gradual environmental modification  of the  oil. Remarkably, at
all stations the degree of degradation  is halted and reversed  for one
to several months during spring to early  summer of 1970.   This, and
the late appearance  of oil at the offshore station discussed above
strongly suggest the movement of  a less degraded oil from the  same
spill from shore into the sediments  of  the open Buzzards  Bay,  most
likely as a result of sediment movement.
                                               U.S EPA Headquarters Library
                                                    Mai! code 3404T
                                               1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
                                                  Washington, DC  20460
                                                     202-566-0556

-------
                             SECTION VI

                         MARINE CHEMOTAXIS

Some natural  organic compounds are of great importance to marine
organisms serving as signals conveying information about the en-
vironment.  Organisms are extremely sensitive to the presence of
such stimuli.  Because of this sensitivity and the very low con-
centration level  at which the natural stimuli occur in the sea, pol-
lution may interfere with the natural chemotaxis of organisms in a
subtle but potentially catastrophic way.   Our research in this area
is multidisciplinary and integrates chemical  studies with those in
animal behavior and neurophysiology.

The principal objectives of the program  are:

1.  Survey of marine animals to determine the extent of their dependence
on chemical communication.

2.  Development of sensitive bioassays for testing chemicals involved
in animal communication and for the detection of the interference by
pollutants with natural communication.

3.  Isolation and structure determination of natural communicants,
synthesis of model compounds and studies of the relationship between
structure and activity.

The eventual goal is an understanding of the response of marine animals
to chemical stimuli; this will enable us to predict the effect of a
pollutant of a given structure on chemical communication in the ocean.

In our initial proposal to FWPCA we requested funds to initiate a
program to investigate the effects of pollution on marine chemotaxis.
The effort is now well underway and our effectiveness has been strengthened
through the hiring - through independent funding, of a neurophysiologist
and an animal behavior specialist.  They perform a detailed survey on
the importance of chemotaxis to marine fishes.  Methods Include anatomical
studies of brain and sensory centers, behavior studies and neurophysio-
logical investigations of organisms in miniature ecosystems.

Two chemical communication systems are being investigated in detail.
The first involves the attraction of starfish to oyster extracts;
the second involves the attraction of a flatworm to its host, the
horseshoe crab.  In both cases the chemicals are water soluble, have
low molecular weights and are active in the part/per billion range.
                                 10

-------
Starfish Chemotaxts

This work, introduced in earlier summaries, has been pursued in two
directions.

The starfish Asterias vulgaris was observed in aquaria and in a flow
tank in the presence of oysters, oyster tissue, and extracts of four
shellfish species (10).  Oysters were approached after varying delays,
opened, and consumed; oyster tissue was rapidly approached and eaten.
Dilute (ppb) shellfish extracts were appraoched in a flow tank.
High concentrations of extracts, elicit posturing and stomach eversion
responses.  This phase of our investigation was aimed at an under-
standing of the behavior of starfish in the presence of a chemical
stimulus and in the hope of the eventual isolation and identification
of the components of the stimulus system.

In addition, we noted during our investigation erratically high responses
to certain blank test solutions.  These were traced to the presence
of compounds attractive to starfish in the perspiration of the experi-
menter.  Several chemicals known to occur in human perspiration have
now been demonstrated to elicit an approach and feeding response in
starfish.

     This unexpected finding again emphasizes the need for great
caution in planning and performing chemotaxis studies; in addition,
it has given us insight into the range of compounds which are sensed
by Asterias vulgaris.

Chemotaxis in the Symbiosis of Limulus and Bdelloura

The host specific substances released by the horseshoe crab Limulus
polyphemus, attracting the symbiotic flatworm Bdelloura Candida have
been investigated.  Water from horseshoe crab tanks contains metabolites
which are attractive to the flatworm, whereas water from other crusta-
ceans has no effect.  We have investigated and isolated two active
compounds that act together as stimulus.  One has been identified as
trimethylamine hydrochloride, the other is still unidentifed.  The
response of Bdelloura to synthetic organic compounds has been investi-
gated.  Ammonium acetate, zinc chloride, dieldrin and aqueous kerosene
extracts had no immediately apparent effects on the response of Bdelloura
to Limulus at 100 ppm.  On the other hand, iron chloride, phosphates
(typical of those in household detergents), detergents and mercuric
chloride interfered with the response of Bdelloura to Limulus water
at 100 ppm but not at 1 ppm.
                                 11

-------
Exploratory Studies, onChemotaxis in Lobster and Alewife

With, increasing experience tn work. with, lower and relatively unso-
phisticated animals CAsterias, Bdelloural we have proceeded to ex-
ploratory work on higher organisms that are also more important com-
mercially.

a).  The effects of kerosene and kerosene fractions on the behavior
of lobster Horoarus-americahus have been investigated.  Kerosene was
fractionated into three fractions; straight chain hydrocarbons,
branched/cyclic hydrocarbons and aromatic hydrocarbons (water soluble
part of kerosene}.  Before the test the animals were observed until
their normal behavior was classified into 65 behavioral units, such.
as attack, grooming, tail flips, etc.  Kerosene caused an increase
in stress behavior, a high degree of grooming, stimulation of feeding
and an increase in,aggression.  The aromatic hydrocarbon fraction
caused the same responses as those observed in the kerosene test
except that feeding behavior was inhibited, although attraction to the
stimulus was still evident.  The branched/cyclic hydrocarbon fraction
caused only weak attraction and stimulation of feeding.  The
straight chain hydrocarbons had no observable effect on behavior.

b).  The recognition of the homestream by alewives (Alosa pseudohafengus)
returning to their spawning ground has been demonstrated to involve
the sensing of chemical stimuli that are specific to the homestream
water.  We find that the active components in this "chemical finger-
print" are heat stable, nonvolatile, polar and of a molecular weight
below 1,000.  Tests on processed fractions from the horaestream
suggest that acids and bases are involved but no lipids and inorganic
anions and cations.

We hope that continuation of this work will aid in predicting the
danger of pollution with certain chemicals to the homestream recogni-
tion of commercially important fishes such as the alewife and especially
the salmon.

Conclusions from Chemotaxts Studies.

These and other investigations in this field demonstrate the extent
to which chemotaxis mediates many important life processes of marine
organisms.   The recent investigations by Mueller on chemotaxis in
brown algae have shown that hydrocarbons, previously thought to be
relatively inert byproducts of plant and animal metabolism, are
directly responsible for the attraction of male gametes to the egg
cell.  Similarly, our work on the hydrocarbon composition of marine
benthic and planktonic algae suggests that hydrocarbons, may be in-
                                 12

-------
tiraately involved in cell division or reproduction.

Obviously, chernotactic processes occur at the molecular level and
conversely, they can he interfered with by chemicals at the molecular
level.  We have carried out exploratory work on the attraction of th.e
mud snail Nassarius, obsoletus to oyster extracts.  This response is de-
pressed by minute amounts of aqueous kerosene extracts.  CA saturated
kerosene extract after a dilution by 10'  still depresses the food
response by as much as 40%).  This suggests that pollution may be
ecologically damaging at concentration  levels far below those normally
considered harmful.
               i

Our investigations directly related to  chemotaxis have been largely
exploratory; however, we have learned much about the complexity of
the processes  involved in stimulus recognition, especially in higher
animals and about the necessary precautions that have to be taken in
experimentation.

We feel that it  is important to continue  this phase of the investi-
gation because of its implications.
                                  13

-------
                            SECTION VII
                          ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We wish, to tfianfc. Dr.  C.  S. tlegre, Project Officer, for Ms support,
advtce and concern.
                                 14

-------
                            SECTION VIII

                             REFERENCES

1.  Muller, D, Q., Jaenicke, L., Donlka, JU., Afcfntoht, .T.,  "Sex
    Attractant in a Brow Alga:  C&eratcal Structure11,  SCIENCE, Vol.  171,
    pp. 815-817 C1971L

2.  Paffenhoffer, G. A., "Cultivation of Calahus belgolandlcus Under
    Controlled Conditions," Eelgolander wlss. Meeresunters.  20,
    346-359 (1970).

-------
                          SECTION  IX
                          PUBLICATIONS

     Listed are all  publications  completed with  partial  or  full
support of Grant 18050 EBN.


1.  Blumer, M., Marine Hydrocarbons  from Organisms  and Pollution.
         Abstract, A.C.S.  Meeting, September  1970,  Chicago, 111.
         WATR 50.

2.  Blumer, M., Oil  Contamination and the Living Resources  of  the
         Sea.  A Review -  presented  at  the FAO Technical  Conference
         on Marine Pollution and  its Effects  on  Living Resources
         and Fishing.   Rome, December 9-18, 1970.

3.  Blumer, M., On the Ecological Risks Inherent in Expanded Off-
         shore Drilling and  Oil Transport.  Testimony.   Jji  Hear-
         ings before the Subcommittee on the  Judiciary United  States
         Senate, Ninety-first Congress, Second Session,  The Petro-
         leum Industry Part  5, Aug.  11  and 13, 1970.  p.  1968-1976.

4.  Blumer, M., On the Impact of  Oil Port and Refinery Operations    ;
         on the Coastal Ecology and  Food Derived from the Sea.
         Testimony.  Jj]^ Hearings  before the Subcommittee on Air
         and Water Pollution of the  Committee on Public  Works,
         United States Senate, Ninety-first Congress, Second Session,
         Machiasport, Maine, Sept. 8 and 9, 1970.   p. 33-42.

5.  Blumer, M., On the Environmental Effects  of  Increased Oil  Traf-
         fic in the Potomac.  Testimony before the  Conservation
         and Natural Resources Subcommittee.  Washington, July 22,
         1970.

6.  Blumer, M;, G. Souza and J.  Sass.,  Hydrocarbon  Pollution of
         Edible Shellfish by an Oil  Spill.  Marine  Biology. (1970)
         i, 195-202.

7.  Blumer, M., G. Souza and J.  Sass.,  Hydrocarbon  Pollution of
         Edible Shellfish by an Oil  Spill.   Report  to the Board of
         Selectmen, Town of Falmouth,  Mass.,  Unpublished Manuscript,
         Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution,  Reference'#70-1,
         (1970).


                                  16

-------
8.  Blumer, M., M.M. Mullin and R.R.L. Guillard., A Polyunsaturated
         Hydrocarbon (3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18-heneicosahexaene) in the
         Marine Food Web, Marine Biology, (1970) 6., 226-235.

9.  Hunt, J. and M. Blumer., Oil Pollution in the Marine Environ-
         ment.  Presented at the 15th General Assembly of the Intnl.
         Assn. for the Physical Sciences of the Ocean, Tokyo, Septem-
         ber 13-25, 1970.

10. Whittle, K.J. and M. Blumer., A Predatory-Prey Relationship.
         Sea Stars-Bivalves.  The Chemical Basis of the Response of
         As ten'as vulgaris to Crass ostrea virginica. A Bioassay, its
         Application and the Partial Purification of an Active Ex-
         tract.  Woods Hole Oceanographic Inst., Unpublished  Manu-
         script, Ref. No. 70-20, (1970).

11. Youngblood, W. and M. Blumer., Hydrocarbons of Benthic Algae.
         Paper presented at 6th A.C.S. Western Regional Meeting,
         San Francisco, October 6-9, 1970.

12. Blumer, M., Oil Pollution of the Ocean.  In: Man's Impact on the
         Environment, ed.: T.R. Detwyler, McGraw Hill, New York (1971)
         295-301.

13. Blumer, M., Scientific Aspects of the Oil Spill Problem.   |n_:
         Coastal Water Pollution, Pollution of the Sea by Oil Spills,
         Committee on the Challenges of Modern Society NATO,  Brussels,
         Number 1  (1971) pp. 9. 1-9.24.

14. Blumer, M., Scientific Aspects of the Oil Spill Problem.   Env.
         Affairs 1  (1971) 54-73.

15. Blumer, M., H.L. Sanders, J.F. Grassle and G.R. Hampson., A
         Small Oil Spill.  Environment  (1971) March, 1_3, 2-12.

16. Blumer, M., Verunreinigung der Gewaesser durch Oel, Zum Problem
         der persistenten Chemikalien in der Umwelt.  EAWAG,  Dueben-
         dorf-Zuerich, Separatum Nr. 398, (1971), 21 pages.

17. Blumer, M., R.L. Guillard and T. Chase.  Hydrocarbons of Marine
         Phytoplankton.  Marine Biology (1971) 3_. 183-189.
                                                       !
18. Ehrhardt, M., and M. Blumer., The Identification of Oil Spills
         by Means of Gas Chromatographic and Spectrometric Data.
         Abstracts.  161st ACS Meeting, Los Angeles, (1971) WATR,  15.


                                 ,17

-------
19. Youngblood, W.,  M.  Blumer,  R.L.  Guillard  and  J.  Fiore.,  Saturated
         and Unsaturated Hydrocarbons  in  Marine Benthic  Algae.   Marine
         Biology (1971) 8,  130-201.

20. Boylan, D.B. and B.W. Tripp.,  Determination of  Hydrocarbons  in
         Seawater Extracts  of Crude  Oil and Crude Oil  Fractions,
         Nature, (1971), 230. 44-47.

21. Blumer, M., P.C. Blockker,  E.B.  Cowell and D.F.  Duckworth.   Pet-
         roleum.  In:   Guide to Marine Pollution,  E.C.  Goldberg,  ed.,
         Gordon anOreech, (1972) p.  19-40.

22. Blumer, M. and J. Sass.  The West  Falmouth Oil  Spill,  Data Avail-
         able in November,  1971. II. Chemistry.   Woods Hole  Oceano-
         graphic Institution Technical Report No. 72-19  (1972).

23. Ehrhardt, M., and M. Blumer.,  The  Source  Identification  of Marine
         Hydrocarbons by Gas Chromatography and Spectrometry.  Environ.
         Poll.  (1972) 3., 179-194.

24. Ehrhardt, M.  Petroleum Hydrocarbons  in Oysters  from Galveston
         Bay.  Environmental Pollution.   (1972) in  press.  3_, 257-271.

25. Zafiriou, 0. Response of Asterias  vulgaris to Chemical Stimuli,
         Marine Biology, 17, 1972, p.  100-107.
Consultation, Testimony and Analyses for  Government Agencies

     We have advised Dr. T. Murphy,  Federal Water Quality  Administra-
tion, prior to a hearing at the Department of the Interior.

     We have advised Mr. E.R. Baird, U.S. Army Engineers,  Norfolk
District, on oil pollution, in  connection with a  law suit  prepared
by the Corps of Engineers.

     We have served  on a FWPCA-API panel  on  the toxicity of disper-
sants and have also  served  on a U.S. Coast Guard  -  National  Academy
of Sciences Panel on Pollution  Monitoring, and on a FWQA Panel  in
Bacterial Degradation of Oil Pollution.

Further, we have testified  at Government  request:

     On the Ecological  Risks Inherent  in  Expanded Offshore Drilling
and Oil Transport:   to the  Subcommittee  on the Judiciary,  U.S.  Senate.

     On the Impact of Oil Port  and Refinery Operations on the Coastal
Ecology and Food Derived from the  Sea:  to the Subcommittee on Air
and Water Pollution  of the  Committee on  Public Works, U.S. Senate.

                                  18

-------
     On the Environmental Effects of Increased Oil  Traffic  in  the
Potomac: to the Conservation and Natural Resources  Subcommittee.

     We have served as a member of the U.S. Delegation to the  NATO/
CCMS Ocean Oil Spills Conference, Brussels, November  1970.

     We have presented testimony at the request of  the Maine Environ-
mental Improvement Commission.

     At the request of EPA, we have carried out analyses of shellfish
speciments for the possible presence of petroleum derived hydrocarbons,

     We have carried out analyses regarding shellfish pollution and
beach pollution for the Town of Falmouth, Mass., for the Department
of Public Health, Commonwealth of Massachusetts and for the Martha's
Vineyard Conservation Society.

     Dr. Blumer was a member of the Pollution Committee, Town of
Falmouth, Massachusetts, 1970-1971.
                                  19

-------
Class
Order
  SECTION X
  APPENDIX
Benth-ic Algae
      Species
Date Cl97Ql/Col lec-
tion Station3
Chlorophyceae




Phaeophyceae














Rhodophyceae




Ulotrichales

Cladophorales
Siphonales

Ectocarpales

Chordarlales

Punctariales

Lamtnariales



Fucales




Bangiales
Cryptonemiales
Gigartinales
Rhodymeniales
Ceramiales
Enteromorpha compressa
Diva lactuca
Spongomorpha arcta
Codfum fragile ssp.
Tomentosoides
Ectocarpus fasciculatus
Pilayella littoral is
Chordaria flagelliformis
Leathesia difformis
Punctaria latifolia
Scytosiphon lomentaria
Chorda filum
Chorda tomentosa
Laminaria agardhii
Laminaria digitata
Ascophyllum nodosum
Fucus distichus ssp.
Edentatus
Fucus spiralis
Fucus vesiculosus
Porphyra leucosticta
Dumontia incrassata
Chondrus crispus
Rhodymenia palmata
Ceramium rubrum
July/2
25 May/1
25 May/1
July/2

25 May/1
25 May/1
25 May/1
1 June/3
1
1 June/3
1 June/3
25 May/1
14 June/1
25 May/1
25 May/1
25 May/1

25 May/1
25 May/1
25 May /I
25 May/1
25 May/1
25 May/1
25 May/1
     Stations:  1 Sandwich Jetty, Barnstable,  Mass.;   2 Little River,
Waquoit Bay, Mass.;  3 West Falmouth Harbor Jetty,  West Falmouth,  Mass.
                                20

-------
Baclllariophyceae
Dinophyceae




Cryptophyceae


Haptophyceae




Euglenophyceae

Cyanophyceae


Rhodophyceae

Xanthophyceae


Chlorophyceae
                           Plahktonic Algae
Cytlotella nana (3H)
Ditylum-brtgfttwellit (D. Bright. 1
Lauderta boreal is [Clone 141
RFitzosolenia setfgera (Rhizo)
Steeletonema costatum (Slcel)
Thalassiosira fluvtattlis (Actin)
Tfialassiostra sp.

Gonyaulax polyedra (GP 60e)
Gymnodintura splendens CGym. s.)
Pertdintuni trochoideum (Pert)
Peridtnium trochoideum, old culture

Cryptoraonas (Rhodomonas?) sp. (3C)a
Cryptoraonas, (Rfiodomonas?) old culture

Coccolithus huxleyi C.BT-6)
Isochrysis galbana (Iso)
Pheaocystis poucheti (Pp)
Pheaocystts poucheti C677-3)

Eutrepiella sp. (W. H. Eut.)

Oscillatoria woronichinii (Sm 24}
Synechococcus bacillaris (Syn.)

Porphyridium sp. CPorph)

Triboneraa aequale CNo. 50)
Undetermined sp. CGSB Stiocho)

Dunaliella tertiolecta (Dun.)
Derbesia tenuisstma (LB 1260)
a  Now believed  to  be  a  species  of Chroomonas.

b  A freshwater  algae, studied because of its clear taxonomic position,
   No certain marine xanthophytes are available.

c  Systematic position uncertain.  May belong to  the new class
   Eustigmatophyceae.
                                  21

-------
                              Copepods
Rhincalanus na&utus.
Eucalanus b.ungtl callfornicus
Calanus helgolandtcus Cpactftcus]
                              Shellfish
Crassostrea virgtntca
Aequipecten irradians
Asterlas vulgarfs
Ltraulus polyphemus
Bdelloura candtda '
Homarus amerfcanus
Also pseudoharengus
Nassarius obsoletus
                              Other Animals
                                 22

-------
                 PART II



SUBLETHAL EFFECTS OF CRUDE OIL ON LOBSTER,



      (HOMARUS AMERICANUS) BEHAVIOR









            Project 118080 EBN

-------
                                    SECTION I

                                   CONCLUSIONS


1.   Effects on behavior and feeding times of the lobster Homarus americanus
    were seen only in the first experiment when crude oil was directly
    added to their aquaria (ration oil-sea water = 1:100,000).  No effects
    could be measured in the second experiment when only the soluble
    fraction of this crude oil was added.  In the latter case, oil was
    added to the water in the same amount (1:100,000) and the soluble
    fraction was recovered from the sea water in the range of 50 parts
    per billion (ppb).

2.   The effects on behavior are interpreted as changes in water chemistry
    sensing movements.  The change in feeding time was caused by a doubling
    of the waiting phase, which defines the time period in which the
    lobster has noticed the food but has not yet left his shelter to
    search for it.

3.   Light and electron microscopy showed no observable changes in
    morphology of odor receptors.  The results are therefore interpreted
    to be caused by the depressing quality of crude oil:  a "bad odor"
    effect.

4.   In the experiment on effects of solubles, some petroleum hydrocarbons
    among a large amount of lipids were present in the aquaria before ,
    oil was added.  After addition of oil, both lipids and hydrocarbon
    concentrations went down considerably.  The degrading oil showed
    a different composition each day in both experiments (crudes and
    solubles), in general following the usual pattern.
                                        -25-

-------
                                    SECTION II

                                  RECOMMENDATIONS


It can be seen from the results of this study that levels of oil in sea
water can be determined which could be allowable for lobsters and other
marine animals.  Using our techniques, sublethal effects can be observed
and quantified.

     1.  In an expanded effort different  (higher) levels of oil
         should be tested.

     2.  Other animals should be tested in a similar fashion.

    • 3.  The experiments should be repeated under natural conditions.

With the addition of the 3 experiments recommended above,reasonable
water quality standards can be set regarding petroleum hydrocarbons
in the sea.
                                        -27-

-------
                                    SECTION  III

                                    INTRODUCTION


It is well known that oil can kill  marine animals, affecting both inhabitants
of surface waters and bottom dwellers  for long periods of time  (Blumer, 1970).
It is also becoming increasingly clear that  marine organisms depend on chemical
communication in one way or another for  individual and species survival.  For
example, catfish cannot locate food without  their sense of taste (Atema, 1971)
and lobsters utilize a sex attractant  for mating  (Atema and Engstrom, 1971).
The possibility of interference with chemical communication by extremely low
levels of crude oil has been pointed out  (Blumer, 1970).  Oil is not only
present as a surface film or in bottom sediments; several fractions also exist
in solution and emulsion in considerable quantities  (Boylan and Tripp, 1971).
With the increasing chance of coastal  oil spills and the understandable
public confusion on ill effects of  oil on lobster populations in mind,
we have tried to develop methods of determining sublethal effects of crude
oil on lobsters under carefully controlled conditions.  The results of such
a study on a much larger scale could be  used to determine what level of
oil pollution becomes intolerable for  marine life and might also indicate
what physiological mechanisms are involved in the effects of oil on the
behavior of these animals.

Oil is a complex stimulus; its effects on behavior are difficult to measure
because many hydrocarbon fractions  have  very different properties.  After
various pilot studies on effects of oil  and  kerosine fractions, we decided
to use whole crude oil and its water soluble fraction.  We selected from
the lobsters' behavior the most reproducible pattern; feeding behavior,
as a standard in which to measure sublethal  oil effects.

As a measure for physiological damage, we chose to examine the microscopical
and submicroscopical structures of  the aesthetasc hairs on the antennules.
These appendages serve an olfactory function and are, together with the
gills, probably the most sensitive  membranes to the outside environment.
                                         -29-

-------
                                     SECTION IV

                                      METHODS


A-   Keeping  of Animals and Test Procedures

Sixteen mature lobsters (Homarus americanus] caught locally around  Woods
Hole, Massachusetts,  were used in the experiments.   Carapace lengths
(measured  from the rear of the eye socket to the beginning  of the
abdomen) ranged from  6.5 cm to 10.1 cm with most lobsters measuring
around 9 cm.   Animals that had molted one to three  months prior  to  the
start of the experiment were chosen to exclude molting and  premolt
effects during the experiment.

All  the animals were  housed in individual 100 liter fiberglass tanks
with one glass window for observation.   Tanks were  maintained at approxiv
mately 22°C  in a closed system.   A large airstone in each tank provided
aeration and circulation of the water.   All animals were given at least
two  weeks  acclimation time, prior to the beginning  of the experiments,
during which they were starved.   Dim room light and a diurnal schedule
were maintained throughout.

During the experiment, each animal was observed individually in its
behavior just before  and after the introduction of  food.  The lobsters
were observed each day between 0800 and 1200 hours  for ten  consecutive
days.  The order of testing individuals was constant,  so that each
lobster was  tested at the same time each day.   A single observation
session for  each animal consisted of two parts:   (1)  a ten  minute period,
during which all behavior units  were recorded;  at the  end food was
introduced;  (2)  the timing of the lobster's feeding behavior.

Food, a small piece of fresh mussel, Mytilus edulis, was slowly lowered
on nylon string at the opposite  side of the tank to where the lobster
was  situated.   In order to do this two pieces  of food  were  always
available, one on the left and one on the right side of the tank.  The
introduction method did not elicit any immediate behavioral  responses
attributable  to visual or mechanical stimuli.   On this amount of food
the  animals were always kept hungry (McLeese,  1972).

Three periods of the  feeding behavior sequence were then timed:  1)
the  alerting  phase; from introduction of food to alert, 2)  the waiting
phase; from  alert to  the beginning of search,  3)  the searching phase;
from the beginning of search to  hit.   Alert was determined  by an increase
in antennule  and/or exopodite rate while a general  body movement marked
the beginning of search.   Hit was the moment of first  physical contact
with the food by the  feeding appendages.

Two series of experiments  were done,  one with whole crude oil and one
with the water soluble fraction  of crude oil.   In the  whole oil experiment
eight lobsters,  four  males and four females were used.  All eight were
selected and  treated  simultaneously.   In the experiments on the effects of
the water soluble fraction four  male lobsters  were  tested at one time,
followed by an identical  series  of four females.  Oil  introduction methods
are reported  later.

                                            -31-

-------
The  crude  oil  tests were  done  in  the  summer  of  1971,  the  tests  with the water
soluble  fraction were  done  in  the winter  of  1972,   In both  experiments  one
animal showed  aberrant behavior and was eliminated.   The  tests  were done with
seven animals  for  crude oil  and seven animals for water soluble fraction.

B.   Behavior Recording and  Analysis

1.   Behavior recordings were made in  shorthand  using  behavior description
units  (see Appendix Table I}.,  which we developed in the course  of  our work
on  lobster behavior.   The shorthand code  was transcribed  on data code
forms for  analysis of  the frequency with  which  each unit  appeared  in
each animal during each daily  observation period.  Superficial  judgment
of  the frequency scores resulted  in elimination of several  units and
grouping of others.  The  units that did not occur frequently enough
to  allow statistical treatment were eliminated.  The  units  "Rake 1,
2,  3" were grouped as  one:  "Rake".  The five groom units  were grouped
as  "Groom".  Table I lists  the resulting  units which  were analyzed.

Of  these units, three  required further treatment before statistical
analysis.   Two of  those,  "Beat" and "Fan", describe appendage movement
rates in three categories:   "Slow, Medium and Fast".  The third
describes  "Claw Position" in "1,  2 and 3".  Since these units must
occur in one of the three categories  all  the time, only their relative
occurrence is  of importance.  With our recording procedure  it is not
possible to measure duration of each  behavior unit.   For  example,  an
approximation  was  obtained by  calculating the number  of "Fast" rates
as  a fraction  (in  percent) of the total number of "Beat".   For
instance,  if for one animal  during one observation period "Beat"
was  recorded 10 times, of which two were  Fast, three  Medium and five
Normal,  the relative occurrence was 20%,  30% and 50%  respectively.
These normalized numbers  (20, 30  50)  were then analyzed as  all other
units (Appendix Table  II, a  and b).

Analysis of the duration  of  feeding behavior phases were  done as
for  behavior units.  The  time in  seconds  was listed for "Alert",
"Wait" and "Search" for each animal and each day (Appendix  Table III).

2.   Statistical analysis  of  these behavior data is made difficult
by great individual differences between such complex  animals as
lobsters.   To  allow for individual differences a non-parametric           i
technique  was  used to  test the significance of changes in unit            '
frequencies.   Treatment of all units,  including normalized  units          /
and  duration times was identical.   A  sample treatment will  be            /
given for  the  unit "Crude, Antenna Wave"*.

Table II lists the 10  experimental days (horizontal)  and  the seven
individual  animals (Vertical).   The numbers in the table  represent
the  frequency  of occurrence  of the behavior unit "Crude,  Antenna
Wave" over  a ten minute period per animal per day.  In other words,
each number means how many times  one  lobster waved his antennae
in the ten observation minutes of that particular day.  A x test
was used to. determine whether or not  the  unit frequency changed
significantly  from the first five days (before oil) to the  next
five days  (after oil).   For  this,  the  two highest scores  and the


*  The units are preceded by  "Crude" or "Soluble" to denote  the
  experiments                           -32-

-------
                                TABLE I

               SELECTED  BEHAVIOR UNITS USED IN ANALYSIS
 Name

 1.  Antenna wave

 2.  Antennule wave

 3.  Wipe


 4.  Rake
 5.  Scoop


 6.  Move


 7.  Climb



 8.  Groom



 9.  Antennule:   Beat  Slow



                  Beat  Moderate


                  Beat  Fast
10.  Fan:
Slow
                 Moderate
                 Fast
11.   Claw 1

     Claw 2

     Claw 3
                                   -33-
     Definition

slow sweep of an antenna

change in antennule positior

wiping of the antennule by
the third maxillipeds

back and forth movement
of one or more walking
legs (pereiopods) across
the substrate while body
is still

lifting of walking legs
from substrate to mouth

any Undirected movement
of the body

raising of body against
the side of the wall to
a vertical position

picking, rubbing, scratching
parts of the body with the
walking legs

beating of the antennules
at a slow or normal rate
(0-60 beats per minute)

beating at a moderate rate
(60-120 bpm)

beating at a fast rate
(x 120 bpm)

slow fanning of exopodite
of 3rd maxilliped (90 bpm)

moderately fast fanning
(90-180 bpm)

fast fanning (>_ 180 bpm)

claws closed

claws half open

claws wide open

-------
                                    TABLE II
         FREQUENCY OF OCCURRENCE OF BEHAVIOR UNIT "CRUDE, ANTENNA WAVE"
Animal                              Days pre-oil                    Days post-oil
Number                          12345               6789   10
  1                             45225              14  14   4  16   10

  2                            16  14   5   3  19               8  28  29  29    7

  3                             8   9   3   1  22              26  22  36  32   29

  4                             5316  11              17   7993

  5                            14   9012              10   1501

  6                             28006              10  14   661

  7                            10   8   2   5  18               2   5  20   9   12
                                      -34-

-------
  two lowest scores were  considered.   In case of a tie  all  tied  numbers
  in that animal were  taken,  until  at least two  numbers  of  both  extremes
  were represented.  In cases of frequent zero scores  (for  instance  see
  Appendix Table Ha,  "Crude, Scoop") this procedure resulted  in large
  numbers of low scores.

  C.  Introduction of  Crude Oil

  A volume of  0.9 ml of La Rosa  crude oil was introduced on to the surface
  water of each test aquarium on day  six at 9 a.m.  This represents  an oil-
  water ratio  of 1:100,000.   A uniform thin brown slick  soon covered almost
  the entire surface of the aquaria.   Vigorous airstone  bubbling resulted
  in some of the oil adhering to the  wall of the aquaria near the airstone.
  Emulsification undoubtedly  took place from the beginning  (Boylan and
  Tripp, 1971) .  Near  the end of the  five day period the surface film had
  disappeared.  Only small brown particles floated at the surface.  Many
  such particles were  stuck to the  walls.

  After completion of  the ten day experiment the antennules  of the ex-
  perimental animals were removed and prepared for electron  microscopical
  examination.

  D.  Introduction of  Water Soluble Fraction of  Crude Oil

  In order to  expose the  test animals exclusively to the water soluble
  fraction of  crude oil a 100 liter all glass mixing tank was set up
  separate from the test  aquaria housing lobsters (see Figure 1).  Water
  was pumped from near the bottom of  the glass mixing tank  into four
  test aquaria using glass tubing,  teflon connectors and a peristaltic
  pump (Manostat standard model).   Pumping rate  was one  gallon per minute.
  The four aquaria received equal amounts of water and fed the extra
  volume back  to the mixing tank by gravity through glass tubing and a
  silicone rubber end  piece to minimize vandalism by the lobsters.  The
  outflow of the feedback was near  the bottom of the oil slick tank,
  away from the intake to insure good mixing.  In the first  five days, no
  oil was present in the  system.  On  day six,  4.5 ml of  La Rosa crude oil
  was introduced on the surface  of  the mixing tank.  This volume was
  calculated to result in an  oil-water ratio of  1:100,000,  similar to
  the ratio used in the whole oil experiment.  A variable speed electric
  mixer (Eastern model 5  VA)  was used at a constant low  speed  (200 rpm)
  to insure proper circulation of water under the oil film without
  causing an emulsion  (Boylan and Tripp,  1971).

  This series was completed for  four  male lobsters  and repeated with
  four female  lobsters, one of which  was eliminated as mentioned earlier.

  E.  Photographic Record
ft
  Each day after the biological  observations,  black and  white photographs
  were taken of the slick in  the mixing tank to  follow its visual appearance.

  F.  Determination of Hydrocarbons and Lipids in Oil-Sea Water Mixture

  1.  Sampling and Extraction

       To collect samples  of  the whole oil-water mixture for chemical
  analysis a separate  aquarium was  set up,  identical with the others, in-
  cluding airstones, lobster  size and feeding.   No observations were
  recorded on this lobster's  behavior.   Crude oil (0.9 ml La Rosa crude)
                                         -35-

-------
Pump
           Stirrer
      Oil  Slick Tank
                               l>
                                         4 Lobster Aquaria

Figure 1.  Connection of oil slick  tank and lobster aquaria  in  solubles
           experiment.
                                    -36-

-------
was introduced on the water  surface at 0900 hr.   At  12  noon  of  that  day (1)  and
on days two  three and  fxve  a volume of five  liters  was siphoned out of the
center of the tank.  Day  four was  not sampled to keep the tank  volume sufficiently
high for the lobster.                                                             }

Each sample was extracted four times with 80  ml  redistilled  pentane    The
resulting 320 ml pentane  extract was evaporated  down to about 2 ml for analysis
by gas chromatography.

2.  Gas Chromatography

     Samples of the pentane  extract (1/50 of  volume)  were injected in
a column (8 ft. 1/16 inch, 0.2% Apiezon L on  textured glass  beads, 80-100
mesh), which was temperature programmed from  50-220°C at 8°/minute and
maintained isothermally at 220 C.   In order to identify the  major peaks
in the chromatograms a  standard was run using 1  yl La Rosa crude dissolved
in 50 yl pentane, of which 1/50 aliquots were used.

G.  Determination of Hydrocarbons  and Lipids  in  Seawater

A flow chart of the chemical analyses of lipid extract  is presented  in
Figure 2.

1.  Sampling and Extraction

     Samples of lobster tank seawater before  and after  oil was  introduced
in the mixing tank, were  taken each day at 12 noon starting  at  day five
of the experiment.  A volume of 1250 ml was siphoned  out  of  the  center
of each test aquarium.  The  resulting volume  (5  liters)  was  extracted
four times with 80 ml redistilled  pentane.  The  pentane extract  was
evaporated down to 2 ml for  chemical  analysis.   Aliquots  of  this frac-
tion were used for the  following analyses.

2.  Ultraviolet-Visible Spectra

     Subsamples of the  lipid extracts  were dissolved  in redistilled
isooctane and spectra obtained  using  1  cm quartz  cells  mounted  in a
Gary Model 14 spectrophotometer.

3.  Infrared Spectra

     Subsamples of the  lipid  extracts  were analyzed as  thin  films
between a 1  x 4 mm NaCl crystal and  a larger  crystal mounted on  a holder
with a 1 x 4 mm mask.   Spectra were obtained  using a Perkin Elmer 337
infrared spectrometer with a beam  condenser.

4.   Column Chromatography (Methods of  Blumer,  1970)

     The lipid extracts (minus subsamples  analyzed above) were dissolved
in 0.2  ml of pentane and charged to a  1.0 ml  column of  silica.  The silica
had been deactivated with 5% water and  extensively eluted with pentane prior
to charging  the sample to the column  in  0.2 ml of pentane-  The  saturated
hydrocarbons  (alkanes)  were eluted with  1.5 ml of pentane  after  collecting
void volume.   Alkenes  and aromatic hydrocarbons were eluted with an additional
6.0  ml  of pentane.   The pentane was removed from each eluate fraction by
evaporation  under  reduced pressure.  The residual was taken up  in 25-100 yl

                                        -37-

-------
                                  FIGURE 2.

                      Flow Chart of Chemical Analyses
                         Pentane Extract of Water
     Aliquot to      j
                     L«w»».«
infrared spectrometryi


     Aliquot to

Ultraviolet and visible

     spectrometry
                          Aliquot weighed to determine

                               IjLpid concentration.
             5% H20
Column Chromatography

 deactivated SiO-,  -
1.0ml column.
                  V
                  1.
              0.8 ml. pentane
               eluate
              (alkanes)
                      2.
               6.0 ml. pentane
                 eluate
             (alkenes and aromatics)
Aliquot weighed-
                               V

                                      Aliquot weighed
                             Analysis by gas

                      gas Chromatography on 7.5 ft. 1/8" o.d.

                      3% Apiezon L /Chromasorb W 80/100 mesh.

                      temperature programmed 80-290^€. at 6°/min.

-------
of CS2 and 2.0-10.0  yl  aliquots  were weighed  on  a Cahn  Electrobalance.
The remainder of the sample was  analyzed by gas  chromatography.

5.  Gas Chromatography

     Hydrocarbons  isolated from  column chromatography were  analyzed on
a 7.5 ft. 1/8"  3%  Apiezon L Chromasorb W 80/100  mesh column.  The column
was temperature programmed from  80-290°C at 6°/minute and maintained
isothermally at 290  C.   All solvents employed in this analysis were redistilled.
Analysis of a blank  showed no contribution by solvents  and  other chemicals
to the reported concentrations of lipids and  hydrocarbons.  UV absorbance
values were corrected for absorbance contributions from the solvents and
chemicals.

H.  Microscopy  of  Chemosensory Hairs

In order to reveal possible structural damage of exposure to oil the
chemosensory hairs on the antennules,  the so-called aesthetasc hairs
were examined by light  and electron microscopy.   Immediately after completion
of the experiments both outer rami of the antennules of the experimental
animals were cut.  One  ramus of  each animal was  used for light microscopy,
the other one for  electron microscopy.

1.  Light Microscopy
                                              •
     Freshly cut outer  rami with aesthetasc hairs were  kept in seawater
and immediately viewed  and photographed with  high power light microscopy and
oil immersion at 1000 x magnification.  A Wild microscope was used with plan
focal objectives and high power  electron flash to reduce exposure time and
improve contrast.  To further decrease exposure  times (to 1 m sec.) pic-
tures were taken on  Kodak Tri X  film exposed  and developed  at 1600 ASA in
Acufine developer.   This procedure resulted in satisfactory pictures with
good contrast,  and relatively free of vibration  "fuzz".

2.  Electron Microscopy

     Antennular outer rami were  cut and fixed immediately in 6%
glutaraldehyde  in  seawater for four hours.  Further fixation in 2% phos-
phate buffered  osmium tetroxide  was done for  16  hours,  after which the
specimens were  dehydrated in an  ethanol series.   At 70% ethanol, the aes-
thetasc hairs were carefully removed from the antennule under a dissecting
microscope.  In some cases individual  segments were cut off the ramus
leaving the two rows of hairs attached to each segment.  Dehydration
was then completed,  after which  the hairs were embedded in  araldite
going through the  following mixutres of araldite and propylene oxide:
0:1 - 0:1 - 1:3 -  1:1 - 1:0.   The plastic was polymerized during 72
hours of baking at 70°C.   Control specimens were prepared from fresh lobsters
using identical procedures.   All  specimens  were  cut and viewed in an
Hitachi electron microscope.
                                        -39-

-------
                                    SECTION V

                                     RESULTS


A.  Analysis  of Behavior

The behavior  units listed in Table I were analyzed individually for  changes
in their  frequency of occurrence during the first five days  versus the
last  five days.   A sample treatment was already given for the  unit "Crude,
Antenna Wave".   All units were treated in this fashion.   The complete
set of results  can be found in Appendix Table II.

Three behavior  units were found to change significantly:   A  x2 test  showed
significance  at the 0.01 level for "Crude, Antenna Wave",  Crude, Antennule
Wave" and "Crude, Fan Slow".  All three units increased in frequency in
the last  five day period compared with the first five day period.  The
frequency change of the unit "Crude, Beat Fast" 0.05  level,  but here
a lower frequency of occurrence appeared in the last  period.

These units were only significant in the Crude Oil experiment,  but not
in tests  with the Soluble fraction.   In these experiments, none of
the behavior  units changed significantly.

B.  Analysis  of Feeding Times

The three time  phases of feeding behavior were analyzed  for  changed  in
duration  in the first five days versus the last five  days.   Treatment was
identical to  that of the frequency of behavior units.  The time in
seconds is listed in Appendix Table III for the complete  set of data.

A significant change (0.01 significance) in feeding time between the
first and the last five days was found only for the phase  "Crude, Wait".
The average "Crude, Wait" time was about doubled in the  last five
days  and  represent the greatest change in the lobsters' behavior.
The mean  wait time in the first five days was 17.2 sec. versus  36.4  sec.,
in the last five days.  No other significant changes  occurred.

C.  Oil Slick Photographs

A visual  idea of the oil slick at days 6-10 can be formed  from  the
photographs that were taken each day (Figures 3 and 4).  The coherent
slick of  day  six is broken up at day seven and finely dispersed at day
eight.  In the  first series a fine granular appearance of  the slick  is
evident on days  nine and ten.   In the second series the slick is probably-
mixed in  with the water to some extent after day nine due  to malfunctioning
of the stirrer.   Mixing was obvious  at day ten, when  practically no  oil
was visible at  the water surface.

                 First series,  oil  in female tanks,  March  10-14, 1972

la.    One  hour after oil introduction (4.5 ml La Rosa  crude); oil covers
      about 20% of the water surface  in an almost solid black-brown
      slick (Figure 3A).

lb.    Seven hours;  oil covers the entire surface, broken up in vacuoles
      up to 4  cm in diameter slightly lighter color (Figure 3B).

2.    Twenty-five  hours;  oil  globules  up to 1 cm in diameter  cover entire
     surface  (Figure  3C).                -41-

-------
3.  Forty-eight hours; same as twenty-five hours  (Figure  3D);  more stirrer
    action visible.

4.  Seventy-three hours; some thin 1 cm globules  still  present,  but
    appearance has become granular and gray  (Figure 3E);  much  oil  has
    disappeared from surface.

5.  One hundred hours; as seventy-three hours  (Figure 3F);  some  oil
    has stuck to the walls  (Figure 3G).

             Second series, oil in male tanks, March 22-26,  1972

1.  Ten minutes after oil introduction (4,5 ml La Rosa, crude);  solid
    black slick covers about 10% of water surface (Figure 4A).

2.  Twenty-seven hours; an oil film with large (up to 3 cm diameter)
    and small vacuoles covers about 85% of surface (Figure 4B).

3.  Fifty-five hours; a thin film full of small vacuoles  (1  cm diameter)
    covers the entire surface (Figure 4C).

4.  Seventy-four hours; very thin granulated cover of oil over whole
    surface  (Figure 4D); some is coating walls.   Stirrer malfunction
    suspected.

5.  Ninety-seven hours; almost all oil has disappeared  (Figure 4E)
    some is  coating walls.  Stirrer malfunction evident, though  not
    directly observed.

D.  Analysis of Hydrocarbons and Lipids in Oil-Sea Water Mixture

Gas chromatograms for pentane extracts of 1) La Rosa crude oil and  2)
oil-water mixtures at day six; 3) day sev«n; 4) day eight; and 5) day
ten are shown in Figure 5.  Major peaks can be matched,.well  and  their
fate followed over five days.  The greatest observable effect  is the
decrease of  low boiling compounds and the increase in the. unresolved
envelope.   In general individual peaks disappear  in favor of the un-
resolved fraction; see also below.

E.  Analysis of Hydrocarbons and Lipids in Sea Water

1.  Hydrocarbon Concentrations and Lipid Concentrations

     The results of the analyses of lipid concentrations and hydro-
carbon concentrations are presented in Table III.  The important
aspects of the data are as follows:
                                        -42-

-------
^;:«M«
 "'-••"-. • ."=-:-" ^•Ssi:"'. •"-  ;   '*  J »/!">-

    ^^&j£&'^$4
 •' ' . ^ "V*-" "•"''-'-.-• ^-^•"  •''' '*•'.-*•'?'•
                                       B
                                        D
                                                         ,  : ->.« •• ''" v' .'
                                                     ^r -•     <    -  **' •  •:  •
                                                    :•*-,   ^  ".  i      -

                   G
Figure 3.  Appearance  of  oil  slick over five day period,  first series of
           solubles  experiment.
                                   -43-

-------
                                     D
Figure 4.   Appearance of oil  slick over five  day  period,  second  series of
           solubles experiment.
                                     -44-

-------
          DAY 1
          DAY 2
          DAY 3
          DAY 5
          LA ROSA CRUDE OIL
	... ,:.r-=-''.'.'^-.: ^-".'.'I-"'-''">	• '
     Figure 5.   Gas chromatograms  of pentane  extract from  oil-water mixture.
                                      -45-

-------
 a)   Lipid concentration decreases  markedly following connection of the
 oil  mixing tank into the water circulating system of the experimental
 tanks  and continues  to  decrease until  day nine where the trend is re-
 versed.   The  day ten lipid concentration is high as  a result of the
 mixing of the oil slick throughout the oil-mixing tank and into the
 experimental  tanks when the stirring motor malfunctioned.

 b)   Total hydrocarbon concentration decreases  after  the oil-slick
 tank is  connected into  the water circulating system.   The  total
 hydrocarbon concentration then fluctuates until day  nine where
 the  concentration decreases and then increases again on day ten
 due  to the stirrer malfunction.

 c)   The  alkane concentration essentially parallels that of the total
 hydrocarbon concentration.

 d)   The  total alkene +  aromatic hydrocarbon fraction concentration
 fluctuates at a value near the lower detection limit  of the methods
 employed until day nine where an increase is noted.   On day ten
 the  concentration again increases  as expected  when the stirrer mal-
 functioned.

 e)   Generally the ratios of hydrocarbons to lipids,  alkanes to lipids,
 and  alkenes + aromatics to lipids  all  increased throughout  the course
 of the experiment with  the exception of a slight  decrease  from day
 seven  to day  eight.   The ratio of  the  alkenes  + aromatics  to lipids
 shows  the greatest increase of the three ratios.

 f)   The  ratios of alkanes/alkenes  + aromatics  shows  a definite de-
 crease after  day six and fluctuates at  lower values  through day ten.

 2.   Ultraviolet-Visible Spectra

 Comparison of the UV spectra given in  Figure 8 with  appropriate
 reference to  the dilution factors  of the lipid extract  showed  a steady
 increase in the  UV absorbance during the experiment  after  the  connection
 of the oil slick tank.   Four absorbance  bands  were clearly  defined in the
 spectra  and the  absorbance  of each band  calculated per  unit volume of
 sea-water and corrected for absorbance  contributions  of the solvents
 and  chemicals used in isolating  the lipids  from the water.   Corrections
 were less than 0.005  absorbance  units  and were small  compared  to the
 absorbance measured  for the  samples except  for day five where  the
 absorbance of the  sample  was  due entirely to the  absorbance of unknown
 compounds contributed by  the  solvents  and chemicals of  the  extraction
 procedure.  The  absorbance  values  of the  four  selected  bands are
 given  in Table IV.

 UV spectra of the  alkene-aromatic  hydrocarbons  isolated by  column
 chromatography from the day  ten  lipid extract  and the UV spectra of
 aromatic  hydrocarbons isolated from the  La  Rosa crude oil used in the
 experiment  are presented  in  Figure  7.   The  spectra are  essentially
 the  same.  A  comparison of  the UV  spectra of the  alkene-aromatic
hydrocarbon fraction  of the  lipid  extract of day  ten  shows  a sub-
 stantial  difference.   This difference could be  due to UV absorption
of polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons present in the lipid extract,
but not eluted from the column or  the presence  of non-hydrocarbon
compounds  soluble  in pentane  and absorbing  in  the UV region.

                                         -46-

-------
  2200
3000  3500          3000   3500     2200




             WAVE  LENGTH,  A
                                                               3500
Figure 6.  Ultraviolet spectra of lipid extracts of solubles on  days 5-10.
                               -47-

-------
 •1.5
 1.0
  .3
  •*
Q;
O
0)
   .•1
 .05
            '  '  '  '  I  '  '  '  '  I  '  '
              DAY  10
            ALKENE  AROMATIC
                     LA ROSA CRUDE AROMATICS
                                                    1
        2500
3000
3500
2500
3000
3500
                            WAVE  LENGTH,   A
     Figure 7.  Ultraviolet spectra of alkene-aromatic fraction of day 10 and

              of whole  crude oil.
                                 -48-

-------
                      TABLE  III  -  LIPID CONCENTRATIONS AND

                     HYDROCARBON CONCENTRATIONS IN SEAWATER
                                                    Day
Lipids
(yg/liter)

Total Hydrocarbons
(pg/liter)

Alkanes
(ng/liter)


Alkene-Aromatic
Hydrocarbons
(yg/liter)
RATIOS

Total Hyd/lipid

Alkanes/lipid

Alkene-Arom/1ipid

Alkane/alkene-arom.
5
1076
43.0
37.8

5.16
0.040
0.035
0.005
7.32
6
232
17.2
15.1
*
<2.01
0.074
0.065
0.009
7.23
7
182
24.5
16.3

8.29
0.135
0.090
0.046
1.97
8
109
12, .4
8,9

3.51
0.114
0.082
0.032
.2.54
9
370
91.8
59.7

32.1
0.248
0.161
0.087
1.86
10
1786
541.0
290.0

251.0
0.303
0.162
0 . 140
1.16
* Concentration could not be more  than 2.01,  the lower detection limit and
  could be much less

                                        -49-

-------
                     1 TABLE IV - ULTRAVIOLET ABSORBANCE OF LIPID




                           EXTRACT OF ONE LITER OF SEAWATER





                                         Day





Wavelength A            5       6       7       8       9       10




   2280                --    -0.604   0.514   0.676   18,20   14.60




   2580                --     0.158   0.194   0.232    4.30    8.84




   2750                —     0.104   0.125   0.166    3.66    6.16




   3120                —      —     0.017   0.008   16.30    2.14
                                         -50-

-------
There were no  detectable absorbance bands in the visible wavelength region
except  for days  nine and ten where weak absorbance was noted at  4000 A.

3.   Infrared Spectra

The  absorbance values for the absorption bands noted in the  IR spectra
of the  lipid extracts are given in Table V.   The values are  absorbances
normalized to  the  absorbance at 2955 cm.   There has been insufficient
time to fully  analyze the data.  However, it is clear that the composition
of the  lipids  in the water is changing as is evidenced by a  decrease
in absorbance  at some wavelengths and increases in absorbance at other
wavelengths.

4.   Gas Chromatography

The  gas chromatograms of alkanes for days 5, 6, 7 and 8 (Figure 8)  showed
very similar patterns with resolved peaks assigned to a series of n-alkanes
and  branched alkanes eluting over a signal due to an unresolved complex
mixture of hydrocarbons.  The signal due to  the unresolved complex  mixture
increased markedly on day nine and increased again on day ten (Figure 8).
Comparison of  the  gas chromatogram of alkanes present on day ten with
the  alkanes isolated from the La Rosa crude  oil used to form the oil
slick showed a depletion of the lower boiling hydrocarbons and a depletion
of the  n-alkanes and branched alkanes relative to the unresolved complex
mixture.  This unresolved complex mixture contains many hundreds of
cyclic  and branched cyclic hydrocarbons - usually designated by the
term naphthenes  and are characteristic of gas chromatograms  of alkanes
isolated from  crude oils and fuel oils.

The  gas chromatograms of the alkene-aromatic fractions  (Figure 9) of
the  hydrocarbons showed the same features on days 5,  6,  7 and 8 with
only three peaks at retention indices 2044,  2081  and  2107 on Apiezon L
present in the gas chromatograms.   No detectable  unresolved  complex
mixture was present.   On day nine and day ten there was  an unresolved
complex mixture  signal present in the gas chromatograms.  The three
peaks were also  present eluting over the complex  mixture  signal.   The
unresolved complex mixture on the day nine and day ten  chromatogram
was  probably due to naphtheno-aromatic hydrocarbons.

F.   Microscopy

A morphological  description of the olfactory sense hairs of  the lobster,
the  aesthetasc hairs,  is given in Figure 10.   These hairs are primary
candidates for disruption by chemical pollutants  because their internal
structures, the  olfactory dendrites and  cilia,  are probably  immediately
accessible to  rather large molecules in  the  environment  (Ghiradella,
1968).   The other  non-chitinous body covering is  found  in the gill
membranes, which were  not investigated.   The rest of  the  lobster is
covered with hard  chitin, impregnated with calcium.

No consistent  differences other than normal  variations  could be observed
either  at the  light microscopical  external level  in_ vivo or  at the
electron microscopical  internal level after EM preparation (Figures  11-18).
                                       -51-

-------
                                            J  EXTRACTION AND ANALYSIS BLANK
                                               (INCLUDES ALL SOLVENTS, REAGENTS)    —
                          INCREASING TIME, TEMPERATURE L
                  22
                      b
                         JO
                             ^3)
Figure 8.   Gas chromatograms  of alkane  fraction of  solubles.
                                  -52-

-------
                                                                  DAY 10
                                                                 SENSITIVITY
                                                                  10"11X16
                               V-J-
                     -UNRESOLVEO COMPLEX
                         MIXTURE
 PHYTr

Hj
               24
        '25
                    23
                             2O
                                   PHYT
                                  U
     17

   • —PRIS
                                         16
                      UNRESOLVED COMPLEX
                          MIXTURE
       £
--'WHOLE LA ROSA CRUDE OIL
        SENSITIVITY
*  Automatic attentuation of detector signal.
Pris-  Pristane  Phyt-  Phytane.  Numbers refer to carbon  chain lengths
of n-alkanes.  Identifications are  tentative only  and are based on
coinjection with even  numbered n-alkanes and/or interpolation between
even-numbered n-alkanes to obtain the retention index   g., 2044 peak.


           Figure 8.  Gas  chromatograms  of alkane fraction of solubles.
                                        -53-

-------
                                                                      DAY 5
                                                                    (SIMILAR ON DAYS
                                                                       6,7.8)       'i-j

                                                                    SENSITIVITY
                  UNRESOLVED COMPLEX
                       MIXTURE
                                                                CO-INJECTED WITH EVEN NO.
                                                                n-olkanes n-c,4-n-c24
                  UNRESOLVED COMPLEX
                      MIXTURE
                UNRESOLVECi COMPLEX
                    MIXTURE
*  Automatic attentuation of detector signal.
Pris-  Pristane, Phyt-  Phytane.  Numbers refer to  carbon chain  lengths
of n-alkanes.  Identifications are  tentative only and are based on
coinjection with even  numbered n-alkanes and/or interpolation  between
even-numbered n-alkanes  to obtain the retention index e.g.,  2044 peak.


     Figure  9.   Gas chromatograms of  alkene-aromatic  fraction of  solubles,
                                         -54-

-------
            TABLE V  - INFRARED ABSORBANCES NORMALIZED




                  TO 2955 Cm"1 ABSORBANCE BAND

cm~l
3000
2955
2915
2850
1735
1715
1626
1450
1410
1379
1265
1100
1029
870
810
760

5
•*•-
1.000
.19
.10
.05
.04
.02
.06
.10
a
4.69
4.31
4.43
0.81
5.75
0.81

6
.10
—
1.40
.75
.45
.35
—
.30
—
.30
1.10
.95
1.10
0.35
1.15
0.50
Day
7
.23
--
1.03
.80
.53
.43
.03
.42
—
.12
.35
.22
.27
.10
.15
0.13

8
.16
--
1.55
.74
.58
.37
--
.32
--
.18
.45
.34
.45
.08
.37
.18

9
.10
—
1.69
.77
.13
—
—
.31
—
.46
.46
.59
.59
—
.59
.46

1.0
0.05
—
1.59
.73
.05
--
.07
.30
—
.16
.07
.07
.09
--
.07
.11
a -- not detected.
                                 -55-

-------
B
                                             1 cm
                                            1 mm
                                         ^
                               0.5 mm



Figure 10.  Antennule with aesthetasc hairs and guard hairs,
                             -56-

-------
Figure 11.   Antennule in  vivo  (150x,  light  microscopy)
                           -57-

-------
                                                            I	1

Figure 12.   Detail  of tip of aesthetasc  hair vivo  (1500x,  light micro-
            scopy).
                                -58-

-------
Figure 13.   Detail  of base  of aesthetasc  hair  in  vivo  (1500x light micro-
            scopy).
                                 -59-

-------
Figure 14.   Aesthetasc hair details (scanning electron  microscopy)
            a)   Tip, head-on view
            b)   distal 1/2 portion
            c)   base,  heart-on view, with pores in antennule

                              -60-

-------
                          ••**'
                               I
n

' IP **•-,,«

                                                           >

                                                                 •
                        »  •  •-
                                                        ,•*
                                                                        V
      Figure  15.   Cross section of middle portion of aesthetasc  hair (12,000x
                  electron microscopy).
                                        -61-

-------
                     V if*
                   'A.  S<-'.- :;
Figure 16.  Detail  of cuticle of Figure  15.   (45,000x electron microscopy'
                                     -62-

-------
•P^^  .-
 c   +          *
^r*--..*"*.,^^    ^V  'i -""
               -       . .•    *   -
                ^.  fc     :ijte?  f?
                ? '
                                      ;.

               "}V2k7  /-
        .w   •%;r*.L4rr/«  * /   °

    Figure 17.  Detail of dentrites inside aesthetasc hair middle portion

             (33,000x electron microscopy).
                           -63-

-------
Figure 18.   Detail  of dendrites inside aesthetasc hair middle portion
            (29,000x electron microscopy).
                                -64-

-------
                                    SECTION VI

                                    DISCUSSION
     Fate of Oil in Seawater
 Some of the results from the more extensive chemical analyses performed
 on the water soluble fraction can be expected to be generally valid for
 the crude oil-water mixture also.  Water analysis on day five before oil
 exposure should be similar in both cases.  It may be expected that,
 since oil emulsified in the first experiment, bacterial degradation
 takes place faster.  A comparison of the gas chromatography results of
 both experiments shows ,' indeed , great similarities in overall similarities
 with time.

 The results of hydrocarbon analyses show that there were probably
 some petroleum hydrocarbons present in the experimental tanks prior
 to exposure to an oil-slick.  This could have been the result of
 contamination of the natural seawater in the experimental tanks,  or
 despite extensive cleaning and leaching procedures, due to contamination
 of the tanks with oil from a previous experiment.

 The decrease in lipid concentration from day five to day six and  con-
 tinuing through day eight could be due to adsorption of lipids onto
 the walls of the oil-slick tank or into the oil slick itself.  The
 addition of water to the system would only dilute the lipid concentration
 to a value of 800 ug/liter, well above that of the 232 yg/liter measured
 on day six.

 The data of Tables III,  IV and V and Figures 6 and 7 all indicate that
 the lipid composition, lipid concentration and hydrocarbon concentra-
 tion are changing throughout the experiment.  The exact processes
 involved are not clear.   Chromatograms in Figures 5 and 8 suggest
 that bacteria and other  microorganisms are degrading the oil.

 The comparison of the gas chromatograms of alkanes of La Rosa crude
 and day ten alkanes show that the oil present in the tanks  after five
 days has been biochemically oxidized to the extent that n-alkanes and
 branched alkanes have been reduced in concentration relative  to the
 naphthenes  (unresolved complex mixture).   This is expected in view  of
 the preferential oxidation of n-alkanes and branched alkanes  relative
 to  the naphthenes as demonstrated by the  many investigations  reviewed
 by  ZoBell (1969).

 The comparison of the UV spectra of lipids extracted on day ten and
 the UV spectra of the alkene-aromatic fraction of hydrocarbons isolated
 from the day ten lipid extract suggests that some of the UV absorption
 of  the day  ten lipid extract is  due to other than aromatic hydrocarbons
 or  to  higher molecular weight aromatics than those eluted from the  column
 by  the procedures  employed — i.e.  more complex polynuclear aromatics
 than phenanthrene  and anthracene.

The  increase in the hydrocarbon  concentrations on day nine may have
been due  to a short term malfunction of the stirrer which was not noted
by visual observations.   This is  conceivable in view of the failure  of
the stirrer on day  ten (also not  observed) .
                                        -65-

-------
 In  conclusion, the data  indicate that several processes may be  operating
 at  the  same  time during  the course of the experiment with  solubles.   Chemical
 analyses presently available show that the behavior of the test organisms
 could have been affected by (1) hydrocarbons from the oil  slick,  (2)  changes
 in  the  composition and concentration of the lipids other than the hydrocarbons,
 (3)  influx of products of the biochemical oxidation of oil by microorganisms.
 However, analysis of  lobster behavior showed no changes caused  by this
 experiment;  only in the  experiment with whole crude oil mixed with sea water
 could behavior changes be measured.

 B.   Behavior Changes

 In  order of  significance, the following behavior units changed  after  the
 lobsters were exposed to whole crude oil:
                                                           2
 Behavior Unit               Direction of Change            X           Significance

 1.   Crude, Waiting Phase       increase                 12.6            .001

 2.   Crude, Antennule  Wave       increase                   9.7            -005

 3.   Crude, Antenna Wave         increase                   8.5            .005

 4.   Crude, Fan Slow             increase                   8.5            .005

 5,   Crude, Beat Fast            decrease                   3.1            .100

 Exposure to  the water soluble fraction of crude oil did not affect the
 lobsters' behavior in a  way that could be measured by our  methods.

 The  changes  in behavior  observed after exposure to whole crude  oil may
 be  summarized as changes in, water chemistry sensing movements:  1) Slow
 rates of gill, bailers increased, which means that less water was passed
 over the gills and around the lobsters' anterior end; 2) Fast antennule
 rates decreased slightly, which means that the lobster "sniffed" (to
 use  a higher vertebrate  analog) less intensely.  Both results indicate
 that there is a tendency for an increase in slow fanning and beating
 movements.   Finally,  3)  Antennae and antennules moved more, which may
 be  the  equivalent of  an  increase in head movements in higher vertebrates,
 or more "looking around".  The increase in antenna and antennule waves
 may compensate for the decrease in gill bailer and antennule beating
 rates;  or, in vertebrate terms, head movements took over from sniffing
 in the presence of oil in the water.

 All phases of feeding behavior may involve sensory perception.  The
 first or alerting phase, in which the animal becomes aware of a chemical
 stimulus, is probably determined by threshold perception of the chemical
 5<:,ises, most likely by antennular aesthetasc hairs of the  sense of smell,
The third or searching phase,  in which the food is localized, probably
 involves chemical and tactile senses in the detection of odor gradients
 and water currents.   The second or waiting phase, however, may  or may
not be under sensory  control.


                                      -66-

-------
One explanation  for  the  doubling of the waiting  phase  is that the animal
is still capable of  perceiving chemical stimuli  in  its environment, but
that the ability to  interpret the stimuli as  food is impaired by direct
damage to the  sensory receptor system.   However, since no major morphological
changes took place in odor receptors,  the aesthetasc hairs of the antennules,
as evidenced by  light and electron microscopy, sensory disruption probably
did not occur  at this level of oil exposure.

Discounting sensory  damage, the waiting phase can be described as a period •
in which the animal  must build up motivation  (i.e., sufficient attracting
stimulation) to  leave the sheltered corner position and go out in search
of food, the chemical presence of which is presumably  known after alerting.
Highly motivated animals (i.e., very hungry ones that  are under little
stress from ambient  light, the presence of the observer, oil or any other
environmental  factor) become alerted and soon run off  to find the food.
In extreme cases, this phase is reduced to zero.  Since all animals were
kept hungry, a time  increase in this phase must  be  due to the one
environmental  stress not held constant; oil.  One might say that oil
produces a bad taste (or odor) in the  water which competes negatively
with the attractive  properties of the  food odor.  This competing effect
of sensory inputs may take place at the receptor sites or, probably, in
more central parts of the nervous system.

There also remains the possibility that oil interferes directly with
the molecular  properties of the food stimulus, changing its odor
characteristics. This would result in difficulty in recognizing the
chemical stimulus as food,hence a longer waiting time.

All explanations are based on the premise that less food stimulation
reaches the receptors or that more food stimulation is necessary to
offset the ill effects ("bad taste") of oil stimulation,  Either way,
the waiting time increases to allow for motivation  (here, level of
positive chemotactic stimulation) to build up.   It may be this same
"bad taste" effect that  changes the water quality sensing movements
of the lobsters' behavior in general.   The possibility must be pointed
out that the change  in water quality sensing  movements  could directly
affect the length of the waiting phase  in feeding behavior.

It has been suggested that the changing chemical composition of degrading
oil may have different levels of toxicity for marine life (Blumer, 1972).
The small number of  tests in relation  to the  individuality of the
lobsters' behavior made  it impossible  to analyze, on a day by day basis,
the oil effect corresponding with the  chemical analyses.  However, if
a particular day and, therefore, a particular composition of the de-
grading oil had  caused a uniform spectacular  change in behavior, it
would have been  apparent in the results.   Thus,  at this exposure level,
no major differences could be seen in  the effects of oil degrading
over a five day  period.

In summary, the  results  show that crude oil,  when mixed in small
quantities (1  ml in  100  1)  in sea water,  has  immediate, measurable
effects on the behavior  of adult male  and female lobsters over a
five day period.  Changes in water quality sensing movements were observed
and the time required to find food,  even when hungry,  was increased.
Sensory damages  by oil at these low levels seems unlikely from the
results of behavior  and  microscopy, but interference with chemical
communication  nevertheless  takes place  when oil  represents a negative


                                        -67-

-------
stimulus reducint the attraction of food.   Long term effects and recovery
were not studied.  The experiments confirm that the low boiling fraction
of oil rather rapidly disappears from sea water and that the higher
boiling fraction increases with time in the water column.   A correlation of
behavior effects with the changing composition of degrading oil could
not be made.
                                      -86-

-------
                                  SECTION VII

                                 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We want to express  our  great  appreciation to Dr, John Farrington and Bruce
Tripp of the Woods  Hole Oceanographic  Institute who did the chemical
analyses of the water soluble fraction and  crude oil-water mixture,
respectively.  Without  their  help  this study would have lost much of its
value.

We also want to thank Dr.  Melbourne Carriker of the Marine Biological
Laboratory at  Woods Hole for  the generous use  of his excellent light
microscopy equipment and Dr.  Susumu Honjo and  Joanne Antanavage of
W.H.O.I,  for their  assistance in the electron  microscopy.

The  Environmental Protection  Agency (Dr. C. S. Hegre, Project Officer)
provided  financial  support under Grant No.  18080 EBN to Dr. John M.
Hunt of W.H.O.I.
                                          -69-

-------
                                  SECTION VIII

                                   REFERENCES

 1.  Blumer, M., (1971), Scientific Aspects of the Oil Spill  Problem.   Environ-
     mental Affairs 1_:  54-73.

 2.  Atema, J.,  (1971), Structures and Functions of the Sense of Taste  in the
     Catfish, Ictalurus natalis.  Brain, Behav., Evol. £:  273-294,

 3.  Atema, J., and D.G. Engstrom, (1971), Sex Pheromone in the Lobster,
     Homarus americanus.  Nature 232;  261-263

 4.  Blunter, M., (1969), Oil Pollution of the Ocean.  In:  Oil on the Sea,
     Plenum Press, pp. 5-13.

 5.  Boylan, D. B., and B. W. Tripp, (1971), Determination of Hydrocarbons
     in Sea Water Extracts of Crude Oil and Crude Oil Fractions.  Nature
     230:  44-47.

 6.  McLeese, D. W.,  (1972).  Initial Experiments on Growth of the American
     Lobster in Captivity, Fisheries Research Board of Canada Technical
     Report No. 320.

 7.  Blumer, M., (1970).  Dissolved Organic Compounds in Sea  Water:
     Saturated and Olefinic Hydrocarbons and Singly Branched  Fatty
     Acids.  In:  Organic Matter in Natural Waters, D. W. Hood, ed-^, Inst.
     Mar. Sci., U.  of Alaska Publ. No.  1, pp.  153-167.

 8.  Ghiradella, H., J. Cronshaw and J. Case,  (1968), Fine Structure
     of the Aesthetasc Hairs of Pagurus, hirsutiuscutus (Dana).  Protoplasma
     6£:  1-20.

 9.  ZoBell, C. E., (1969), Microbial Modification of Crude Oil in the Sea.
     In:  Proceedings Joint Conference on Prevention and Control of Oil
     Spills .  American Petroleum Institute, pp.  317-326.

10.  Blumer, M.,  (1972), Oil Pollution:  Persistence and Degradation of
     Spilled Fuel Oil.  Science 176:   1120-1122.
                                        -70-

-------
                                   SECTION IX

                               PENDING PUBLICATION


Atema, J. and L. Stein.   Sublethal Effects of Crude Oil on Feeding Behavior
in the lobster, Homarus  americanus.  Marine  Behavior and Physiology, sub-
mitted.
                                           -71-

-------
                                   SECTION X


                                   APPENDICES




App. Table I:  Complete list of behavior units (Homarus americanus)

App. Table Ha:  Frequency of occurrence of selected behavior units

App. Table lib:  Frequency of occurrence of the behavior units "Beat", "Fan1'
                 and "Claw" presented in raw scores and normalized scores
App. Table III:  Duration of Phases in Feeding Behavior
                                        -72*

-------
Name

Beat
      Slow

      Moderate

      Fast
                  APPENDIX TABLE I

COMPLETE LIST OF BEHAVIOR UNITS (Homarus americanus)


                      Definition

                 Beating of antennules at
                 the following rates:

                 0-60 bpm

                 60-120 bpm

                 ^ 120 bpm
Wipe
Antennule position 1-5

Antennule wave

Antennule point


Antenna wave

Antenna wipe


Antenna position

      normal
      up
      folded
      back

Antenna feel


Antenna touch

Antenna point


Fan


      Slow

      Moderate

      Fast

Maxilliped movement

Maxilliped rub


Maxilliped extended
                 wiping of an antennule
                 with 3d maxillipeds
It;
                                 54-
                 change in antennule position

                 movement of antennules in
                 direction of stimulus

                 slow sweep of an antenna

                 wiping of an antenna with
                 3d maxillipeds
                 in front
                 straight up
                 folded back
                 between up and folded

                 quick, successive move-
                 ments of antennae over object

                 antenna touching object one time

                 movement of antenna in direction
                 of stimulus

                 Fanning of exopodites of 3rd
                 maxillipeds; rates:

                 0-40 bpm

                 90-180 bpm

                 >_ 190 bpm

                 swaying of 3d maxillipeds

                 moving 3d maxillipeds
                 against each other

                 stretching of maxilliped
                 down toward substrate
                          -73-
                                           Code
aaS

aaM

aaF

aw


aa ; etc.

aT

aP


aW

Aw
                                          AAn
                                          AAu
                                          AAf
                                          AAb
                                          AT

                                          AP
                                          exo S

                                          exo M

                                          exo F

                                          mm

                                          Ru


                                          Me

-------
Name

C,law position 1

Claw position 2


Claw position 3


Claws

     Up

     Level


     Down


Claw spread

Stretch claws

Withdraw crusher

Withdraw seizer

Shield

Body position

     low on  legs

     medium  on legs


     high on legs

Crouch


Tail position 1-5

Tail arch

Tail hump


Defensive posture


Move

Walk
  Definition

claw closed

claw ^ open

claw full open
claw raised above eye level

claw raised but below eye  level


claw on substrate


claws raised and spread

extend claws in front of body

bring crusher claw close to body

bring seizer claw close to body

Keep claws closed in front, passive



body close to substrate

body partially raised off  sub-
strate

body raised high

sit very low on legs and body
fairly compact

1-; 2-s 3-i; 4~>; 5=>;

curling tail upward

raising abdomen while tail
is down

Tail position 5; body raised,
claws 2-3 and up

any undirected movement of the body

walk
                                                                           Code
Sl or Ci
   or
S , etc.

SI


Sl

CIS

St.C

WCr

WSe

Sd



lo legs

M legs


H legs

Cro


T^ etc.

Arch

Hump


Def


GBM

W
                                        -74-

-------
Name

Slow walk

Stop walk

Run

Reverse

Stop reverse

Walk sideways


Approach


Climb



Descend

Reverse  descend

Raise  rear


 Fall

 Pounce



 Roll

 Enter  hole forward


 Enter  hole reverse

Turn

 Rake
      I

      II

      III
 Scoop
   Definition

slow walk

stop walk

fast walk

walk backwards

stop walk backwards

forward and lateral
walk at the same time

forward movement directed
toward stimulus

raising of body against side of
rocks, walls,, etc. to a vertical
position

climb down

climb down backwards

tail up on wall, rock etc.
(describe)

free fall descend

sudden lowering of body
usually accompanied by
feeding behavior

lateral rotation of body

crawl into hole forward
(denote which hole)

crawl into hole tail first

change direction of body

back and forth movement of
one or more walking legs
across the substrate while
body is still

slow rake

moderate rake

fast rake

lifting of walking  legs
from substrate into mouth

      -75-
Code

Slo W

Stp Jf

Run

Rev

Stp Rev

WS


app


Cl



D

RD

RR


FD

Pounce



roll

HF


H rev.

T
 R  I

 R  II

 R  III

 sc

-------
Name

o
Pinch
Poke

Dig

Bulldoze


Lunge

Snap


Swinuneret wave

Stop swinuneret wave

Groom



     antenna

     antennuies

     swimmerets

     carapace

     rostrum

     eye

     claws

     legs

     tail

Stop groom
   Definition


opening § closing dactyls
of walking legs

poke into substrate with legs

moving substrate with legs

push gravel with maxillipeds
and/or claws

fast extension of claws

quick opening § closing of
seizer claw

beating of swimmerets

stop beating of swimmerets

picking, rubbing, scratching
parts of body with the walking
legs
 Code


 pin


 Po

 Dig

 BD


 lunge

 snap


 sw

 stp sw

 GR



AA

aa

sw

car

ros

eye

claws

 legs

tail

stp Gr
                                       -76-

-------
                                            Definition
                                               Code
AGGRESSIVE
Being pulled

Being pushed

Claw lock

Engage

Face off

Grab


Jab"

Positioning

Pull

Push crusher
 Push seizer
 Rip

 Low rip
 Shake
Roll animal over

Swat

Release
On Guard


MATING
Dismount
Ejaculate
Limp
while in claw  lock, being maneuvered
by other animal forwards
in encounter, being maneuvered by other
other animal backwards
handshake position of animals while
in face off  -  crusher - crusher only
maneuvering  of claws to get into claw
lock
face to face confrontation of two
animals within o'ne body length
claw placed  around part of other
animal and bear down, including
crusher-seizer hold
poking at other animal's body
or claws with  own claws
first stages of maneuvering in
claw lock
while in claw  lock, maneuvering
other animal
with crusher,  push other animal.
If not in claw lock, push will
be with back of claw
same as above  but with seizer
bearing down with claws and
quick jerking  of body—high intensity
low intensity  Rip
while in claw  lock, movement of
claw that is locked toward other
animal and back toward self
(slow moving)
while in claw  lock, due to strength,
turning other  animal on its side
swinging of seizer toward other animal
(like a right  hook)
letting go of  claw lock
one claw raised and extended and other
claw close to  body and down
walking away from mount
thrust of abdomen of male while mating
describes submissive animal when being
mated—no resistance
puld

pud

CL

En

FO

G


ja

Pn

pul

PuC
PuS
Ri

loRi
Sh
RAO

Swat

Rel
OG



DisM
ejac
Li
Mount
     II
     III
Resisting
Turn animal over
beginning stages—claws and/or
maxillipeds on another animal
1/2 way on other animal
fully on other animal
opposite of Limp
after mounting, turning the
submissive animal over
M I

M II
M III
Res
TAO
                                      -77-

-------
                                APPENDIX TABLE  Ha
                Frequency of occurrence of selected behavior units

Unit: Crude, Antenna Wave

                               Days pre-oil                    Days  post-oil
Animal Number              12345	6   ,7 r  8    9   10
     1                      45225                14  14    4   16   10
     2                     16  14   5   3  19                8  28  29   29     7
     3                      8   9   3   1  22                26  22  36   32   29
     4                      5   3   1   6  11                17    7    9    9     3
     5                     14   9012                10    1501
     6                      28006                10  14    661
     7                     10   8   2   5  18                2    5  20    9   12
Unit: Crude, Antennule Wave

                               Days pre-oil                    Days post-oil
Animal Number              12345                6789   10
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
Unit:  Crude, Wipe

                               Days pre-oil                    Days post-oil
Animal Number              12345	6   7   8   9   10
    1                     14  11  10   2   3                7   7  13   8    6
    2                      3  13   0  13   0                5  11   7   5    3
    3                      78336                1  12  14   44
    4                      8  38   152                16408
    5                      3  13   4  15   6                13302
    6                      370  10  21                81533
    7                      8  10   206                72745
                                       -78-
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
1
0
0
2
1
0
0
0
0
3
9
0
1
0
0
0
0
3
0
0
0
6
0
0
2
1
1
0
1
0
1
3
1

-------
                          APPENDIX TABLE  I la  continued
Unit:   Crude, Rake
  .   ,  „  ,_                        Days Pre-oil                  Days post-oil
Animal  Number                  1    23    4   5    _ 6   7   8   9   10
    1                         14    8   5    0   5             0   1  12  11    8
    2                          00200             05220
    3                          0   15   000             00351
    4                          01000             11714
    5                          39831             309  12    8
    6                          2520   16             10000
    7                          11100             02707

Unit:  Crude, Scoop
                                   Days pre-oil                  Days post -oil
Animal  Number                  12345             6789   10
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7

Unit:  Crude, Move
                                   Days pre-oil                  Days post-oil
Animal  Number                  12345 _ 6 _ 7 _ 8 _ 9 _ 10.
    I                          13016             66355
    2                          31035             23563
    3                          23004             44  10   37
    4                          14323             42333
    5                          34202             23201
    6                          14137             41137
    7                          31314             22313
14
0
0
0
2
0
0
10
0
53
0
18
0
0
4
0
0
0
8
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
9
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
8
13
1
0
0
0
0
7
1
4
1
3
0
2
10
0
0
0
0
0
0
12
0
3
0
0
0
4
                                      -79-

-------
                            APPENDIX TABLE Ha comt,
Unit:  Crude, Climb

Animal Number
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7

Unit:  Crude, Groom

Animal Number
    1
    2
           i
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
Days pre-oil
Days post-oil
1
5
0
0
0
4
0
0
1
15
0
0
1
0
1
2
2
2
0
0
1
0
0
0
Days
2
20
2
0
0
3
0
3
3
7
2
3
0
0
1
0
r.4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
pre-oil
3 4
4
0
0
2
1
1
0
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
5
2
0
0
3
0
1
1
5
2
0
0
0
0
8
0
6
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
6
0
0
0
0
6
1
0
7
0
4
0
2
0
0
0
Days
7
8
0
5
0
0
4
0
0
8
0 19
1
0
0
0
1
0
2
0
0
1
0
4
9
2
0
0
1
0
0
0
10
3
1
0
0
0
0
0
post-oil
9 10
8
0
4
8
0
0
0
10
0
0
0
0
0
0
                                     -80-

-------
                             APPENDIX TABLE Ila cont.
Unit:  Soluble, Ant^na Wave




                           Days pre-oil
Animal Number
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Unit: Soluble,
Animal Number
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
1
15
30
33
10
15
20
33
Antennule
1
5
2
0
2
0
5
1
2
5
27
19
16
41
3
15
Wave
Days
2
4
3
6
2
5
3
2
3
6
31
15
23
4
17
6

4
2
22
14
15
20
17
13

pre-oil
3 4
1
4
4
0
15
6
6
4
6
8
2
0
3
0
5
3
12
21
7
7
3
20

5
0
0
4
1
0
3
2
6
11
25
24
5
7
18
15

6
2
3
3
2
0
6
0
	 j —
7
3
43
24
14
10
28
17

Days
7
1
0
2
3
10
2
3
JT
8
11
8
6
14
6
18
13

9
5
13
3
30
16
24
16

post- oil
8 9
3
1
1
2
2
6
2
1
2
2
2
2
3
5
10
14
49
3
13
17
5
15

10
0
1
6
0
1
5
3
                                      -81-

-------
                             APPENDIX TABLE Ila cont.
Unit:  .Soluble, Wipe



                           Days pre-oil                  Days post-oil
Animal Number
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Unit: Soluble, Rafc?.
Animal Number
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
1
2
6
3
2
2
6
2

1
0
0
5
1
0
1
1
2
3
3
7
9
3
0
23

Days
2
3
0
4
12
3
0
0
3
5
5
10
2
3
1
3

4
0
5
5
5
9
2
13

pre-oil
3 4
2
0
7
4
1
0
4
0
2
1
2
0
0
2
5
3
7
6
4
4
5
3

5
2
2
6
0
0
1
2
6
3
7
6
6
3
2
23

6
3
5
1
7
0
3
5
7
2
3
8
12
0
3
3

Days
7
3
0
0
4
0
5
3
8
4
4
5
7
3
4
11

9
5
0
5
2
1
4
5

post-oil
8 9
0
5
3
12
3
3
2
1
0
1
0
3
8
2
10
2
6
3
6
4
5
3

10
1
3
10
10
0
6
0
                                       -82-

-------
                            APPENDIX TABLE  Ha cont.

Unit:   Soluble, Scoop
Animal  Number                     Days pre-oil                  Days post-oil

    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7

Unit:   Soluble, Move
Animal Number
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
Unit:  Soluble, Climb
Animal Number

    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
5
2
3
1
1
0
0
10
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
1
27
11
0
2
Days
2
4
1
1
4
0
0
3
Days
2
0
0
3
0
4
0
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
4
0
0
0
3
0
0
1
pre-oil
3 4
1
2
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
3
1
1
1
0
pre-oil
3 4
0
0
5
3
0
0
0
0
1
4
0
0
0
0
r
%/
4
0
0
0
0
2
1
5
3
1
1
5
1
0
3
5
0
1
8
0
0
0
0
6
0
6
1
2
0
0
3
6
2
2
3
2
1
2
5
6
0
0
2
0
0
1
0
7
5
0
0
8
0
0
0
0 13
0
0
0
Days
,7
1
0
1
3
0
2
2
Days
7
0
14
2
0
0
1
0
0
0
7
9
0
0
2
0
0
0
2
10
2
1
3
1
0
0
0
post-oil
8 9 10
3
2
2
2
1
0
3
3
1
3
2
2
4
2
1
1
0
4
1
1
1
post-oil
8 9 10
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
1
                                     -83-

-------
                            APPENDIX TABLE Ha qont.

Unit:  Soluble, Groom
Animal Number                     Days pre-oil                  Days post-oil
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
1
0
1
0
6
4
3
0
2
1
2
9
25
12
0
0
3
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
4
0
8
3
10
0
0
0
5
7
0
2
0
1
0
0
6
0
5
0
0
0
0
1
7
13
16
30
3
0
0
0
8
8
1
33
0
9
0
3
9
0
1
22
0
13
0
0
10
1
0
16
0
0
0
0
                                      -84-

-------
                                APPENDIX TABLE lib
Unit:   Crude, Beat

                               Days pre-oil                      Days post-oil
Animal Number               1   25   4   5  	6   7   8   9   10
     1     Slow             02252                 42332
           %                0  25  40  83  50                50 100  38  43  33
           Moderate         15312                 40433
           %               12  63  60  17  50                50   0  50  43  50
           Fast             71000                 00111
           %               88  12   0   0   0                 0   0  12  14  17
     2     Slow             52410                 10354
           %               50  15  80  20   0                12   0  23  38  40
           Moderate         5  10   146                 74886
           %               50  77  20  80  67                88  57  62  62  60
           Fast             01003                 03200
           %                0   8   0   0  33                 0  43  15   0   0
     3     Slow             63334                 11134
           %               67 100  43  50  66                10  20  14  43  44
           Moderate         30121                 84345
           %               33   0  14  33  17                80  80  43  57  56
           Fast             00311                 10300
           %                0   0  43  17  17                10   0  43   0   0
     4     Slow             14535                 45635
           %               17  57  71  75  46                40  63  86  50 100
           Moderate         52214                 53130
           %               83  29  29  25  36                50  37  14  50   0
           Fast             01002                 10000
           %                0  14   0   0  18                10   0   0   0   0
     5     Slow             24345                 26332
           %               22  50  75 100  62                40  67  34  75 100
           Moderate         43003                 22410
           %               44  38   0   0  38                40  33  44  25   0
           Fast             31100                 10200
           %               34  12  25   0   0                20   0  22   0   0
     6     Slow             24145                 37448
           %               40  33 100  50  72                43  88  80  57  80
           Moderate         28041                 41132
           %               40  67   0  50  14                57  12  20  43  20
                                          -85-

-------
                             APPENDIX TABLE lib cont.
                                                              v
Unit:  Crude, Beat

                               Days pre-oil                           Days post-oil
Animal Number               12545	6     7    8   9   lp
           Fast             10001                    00000
           %               20   000  14                    00000
     7     Slow             43437                    55625
           %               50  75  67  38  70                   83  100   86 67   83
           Moderate         41252                    lOlli
           %               50  25  33  62  20                   17     0   14 33   17
           Fast             00001                    00000
           %                0000  10                    00000
                                          -86-

-------
                            APPENDIX TABLE lib 
-------
                                 APPENDIX TABLE lib cont.
   Unit:  Crude, Claw
                                  Days pre-oil                     Days post-oil
Animal Number                   12345	6   7   8   9   10
   1.  Position I
       %
       Position II
       %
       Position III
       %
   2.  Position I
       %
       Position II
       %
       Position III
       %
   3.  Position I
       %
       Position II
       %
       Position III
       %
   4.  Position I
       %
       Position II
       %
       Position III
       %
   5.  Position I
       %
       Position II
       %
       Position III
       %
   6.  Position I
       %
       Position II
       %
       Position III
       %
   7.  Position I
       %
       Position II
       %
       Position III
7
70
3
30
0
0
0
0
3
75
1
25
0
0
3
75
1
25
0
0
2
100
0
0
3
75
1
25
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
100
0
0
4
40
6
60
0
0
4
67
2
33
0
0
0
0
1
50
1
50
2
100
0
0
0
0
2
40
3
60
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
33
4
67
0
0
2
100
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
100
0
0
1
25
3
75
0
0
0
0
2
100
0
0
2
100
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
50
1
SO
0
0
2
100
0
0
0
0
4
100
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
100
0
0
0
0
3
75
1
25
0
0
2
100
0
0
0
0
2
100
0
0
0
0
4
100
0
•o
0
0
4
100
0
0
0
0
4
67
2
33
0
0
4
100
0
0
0
0
2
100
0
0
2
50
2
50
0
0
2
50
2
50
0
0
0
0
2
100
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
100
0
0
2
33
4
67
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
100
0
0
0
0
4
100
0
0
4
50
4
50
0
0
0
0
3
75
1
25
4
67
2
33
0
0
0
0
2
100
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
100
0
0
1
6
15
94
0
0
0
0
4
67
2
33
0
0
4
100
0
0
2
33
4
67
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
25
3
75
0
0
2
13
13
87
0
0
0
0
6
100
0
0
1
50
1
50
0
0
1
25
2
SO
1
25
0
0
2
100
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
100
0
0
0
0
12
100
0
0
0
0
2
100
0
0
0
0
4
100
0
0
0
0
2
100
0
0
0
0
2
100
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
75
1
25

-------
                                  APPENDIX TABLE lib cont.

       Unit:  Soluble,  Beat

Animal Number                           navs m-e oi i                  n
                                        uays pre-oii                  0ayS post-oil
                                	L   2   3   4   5  	6    789    10

   1     Slow                      10   7  10  10   S             6    6  8   S    11
         %                         77  64  91 100  83  ,          33  60 67  24    79
         Moderate                   24101            11    4  4  11    3
         %                         15  36   9   0  17            61  40 33  52    21
         Fast                       10000             10050
         *                          80000             600  24    0
   2     Slow                       46798            12   ,6  3  15    5
         %                         20  21  44  69  36            57  43 20 100    25
         Moderate                  11  13   8   3  10             8    6 12   0    12
         %                         55  45  50  23  45            38  43 80   0    60
         Fast                       5  10   1   1   4             1    2  0.   0. .   3
         %                         25  34   6   8  18             5  14  0   0    15
   3     Slow                      10   8   9  11   6             8    6  6  11    13
         %                         50  50  39  55  24            33  35 60  92    93
         Moderate                   5697  15            16    7411
         %                         25  38  39  35  60            67  41 40   8    7
         Fast                       52524             04000
         %                         25  13  22  10  16 .            0  24  0   0    0
   4     Slow                       5  10   5  11  11  .,         11    5 12   7    11
         %                         26  63  21  65  58            58  25 55  24    65
         Moderate                  14   6  18   6   8             8  15 10  21    6
         %                         74  37  75  35  42            42  75 45  72    35
         Fast                       00100             00  ,010
         %                          00400             00030
   5     Slow                      11   9  17  12  10            14  11 10  20    14
         %                         55  50 100  57  77,           100  100 100  95    82
         Moderate                   97093             00013
         %                         45  39   0  43  23             0    0  0   5    18
         Fast                       02000             00000
         %                          0  11   000             00000
   6     Slow                      11  10  12   9   9            11    9 13  10    6
         %                         42 100  57  38  50            55  43 100  53    50
         Moderate                  14   0   9  15   9             9  12  0   9    6
         %                         54   0  43  62  50            45  57  0  47    50
         Fast                       10000             00000
         %                          40000             00000
   7     slow                      16  12  16  10  11             4    4 10  14    9
         %                         72  80  84  77  92     .       25  20 100  88    53
         Moderate                   6   3   3   3   1            12  16  0   2    8
         %                         28  20  16  23   8            75  80  0  12    47
         Fast                       00000             00000
         %                          00000             00000

                                            -89-

-------
                              APPENDIX TABLE lib cont.
Unit:  Soluble, Fan
                               Days pre-oil                          Days post-oil
Animal Number               12545	_6	7	*	9   10
     1     Slow             47  10   03                     75829
           %              100 100 100   0  50                    100  83  100   50   100
           Moderate         00003                     01020
           %                0   0   0   0  50                     0  17   0   50    0
           Fast             00000                     00000
           %                00000                     00000
     2     Slow             25531                     64026
           %               40  83 100 100 100                    86  33   0  100   100
           Moderate         31000                     14100
           %               60  17   0   0   0                    14  33  100    0    0
           Fast             00000                     04000
           %                00000                     0  33   000
     3     Slow             74653                     459   10    8
           %               41 100  55  83  43                    100  100  69  100   100
           Moderate         30513                     00400
           %               18   0  45  17  43                     0    0  31    0    0
           Fast             70001                     00000
           %               41   000  14                     00000
     4     Slow             73789                    10    3  10    4   11
           %              100 100  64 100 100                    100  100  100   44   92
           Moderate         0   0   3'  0   0                     00051
           %                00  27-  00                     0    0   0   56    8
           Fast             00100                     00000
           %                00900                     00000
     5     Slow             8   0   0   0  11                     0  10  10    6    6
           %              100   0   0   0 100                     0  100  77   50   100
           Moderate         06600                     00360
           %                0  50 100   0   0                     0    0  23   50    0
           Fast             06000                     00000
           %                0  50   000                     00000
     6     Slow             5   0   8   0  10                    11  12   0   10    10
           %               83   w lUO   0 100                    100  80   0   91   100
           Moderate         10050                     03010
                                        -90-

-------
                             APPENDIX TABLE  lib ciont.

Unit:   Soluble, Fan

                               Days pre-oil                           Days  post-oil
Animal  Number               12345  	6    7    8    9   1C[.

           %               17   0   0 100    0                      0   20    0    9    0
           Fast             00000                      00000
           %                00000                      00000
     7      Slow             7   8   8   11    8                      5    8  10   12    6
           %               100  89  67   69  100                     38   47  100   80   43
           Moderate         01450                      8   11    037
           %                0  11  33   31    0                     62   53    0   20   50
           Fast             00000                      00001
           %                00000                      OOOOt
                                         -91-

-------
                    APPENDIX TABLE III - DURATION OF PHASES
                              IN FEEDING BEHAVIOR
                             CRUDE,  ALTERTING PHASE

Animal Number                    Days pre-oil                  Days post-oil
                         	1   2345             678910

     1
     2
     3
     4
     5
     6
     7
:25 :15
:17 :22
:10 :21
:17 :06
:20 :15
:28 :20
:40 :10
:ll
:20
:25
:15
:25
:15
:35
:18
:15
:12
:45
:30
:20
:25
:47
:06
:17
:13
:07
:09
:35
:27
:23
:05
:40
:20
:35
:20
:20
:17
:11
:30
:30
:38
:15
:05 :05
:25 :22
:04 :07
• TO • 1 C
« X O * JL O
:1S :10
:12 :20
:17 :28
:07
:26
:10
:08
:31
:15
:30
                                     -92-

-------
                           APPENDIX TABLE III cont,

                             CRUDE, WAITING PHASE

Animal Number                    Days pre-oil                  Days post-oil
                         	1   2345             6789   10

     1
     2
     3
     4
     5
     6
     7
:12
:21
:07
:04
:20
:05
:07
:10
:17
:04
:08
:53
:05
:40
:12
:00
:00
:07
:00
:08
:20
:00
:65
:00
:25
:00
:18
:15
:00
:72!V
:02
:54
:11 .
:14
:65
:78
:45
:03
:35
:03
:27
:98
:55 :10
:46 :40
:22 :11
:25 :44
:22 :13
:17 :10
: 130: 30
:12
:58
:10
:45
:15
:92
:47
:10
:60
:15
:70
:08
:13
:47
                                      -93-

-------
                           APPENDIX TABLE III cont.
                            CRUDE, SEARCHING PHASE
Animal Number
     1
     2
     3
     4
     5
     6
     7
    Days pre-611
12   3   45
Days post-oil
7   8   9   10
:06
:38
:15
:4S
:07
:07
:09
:04 :12
:10 :12
:10 :25
:61 :38
:13 :12
:10 :04
:08 :05
:04
:12
:07
:08
:33
:08
:22
:09
:24
:22
:37
:08
:05
:16
:09
:07
:29
:13
:12
:07
:34
:07
:18
:12
:35
:09
:06
:06
:15 :03
:12 :07
:10 :03
:11 :26
:06 :08
:04 ;08
:11 :05
:03
:06
:30
:57
:04
:07
:05
                                    -94-

-------
                           APPENDIX TABLE III  cont.

                             SOLUBLE, ALERTING  PHASE

Animal Number                     Days pre-oil                   Days post-oil
                                  2345         6789     10
:25 :08
:28 :40 :15
:27 :14 :07
:105
:65
:24
:25
:20
:35
:22
:26
:22
:20
    2
    3                      :24  :30   :50  :10  :35       :25  :12   :13  :22    :21
    4                      :28  :14   :15  :08  :15       :15  :12   :20  :07    :07
    5                      :18  :27   :29  :07  :14       :12  :32   :14  :15    :08
    6                      :23  :13   :15  :15  :12       :15  :10   :20  :13    :07
    7                      :28  :26   :26  :60  :36       :09  :06   :13  :12    :13

-------
                           APPENDIX TABLE III cont.

                            SOLUBLE, WAITING PHASE

Animal Number                    Days pre-oil                  Days post-oil
                            12345         6789    10
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
:42
:25
:08
:12
:17
:17
:16
:58
:10
:26
:20
:21
:04
:09
:32
:43
:26
:10
:09
:21
:33
:45 :15
:80 :13
:23 :58
:06 :04
:12 :02
:07 :11
:06 :15
:100
:84
:18
:40
:20
:14
:31
:08
:68
:13
:21
:19
:07
:46
:26
:101
:17
:46
:16
:06
:37
:38
:39
:03
:34
:14
:19
:40
:14
:30
:05
:48
:14
:20
:30
                                    -96-

-------
                               APPENDIX  TABLE  III cont.
                               SOLUBLE,  SEARCHING PHASE

Animal Number                      Days pre-oil                    Days post-oil
                                1    2     .34     5          6789     10
     2
     3
     4
     5
     6
     7
:05
:04
:08
:06
:15
:18
:08
:04
:09
:13
:05
:31
:13
:09
:22
:1S
:22
:06
:32
:07
:18
:04
:17
:07
:06
:05
:15
:15
:12
:05
:12
:06
:06
:06
:18
:87
:1S
:07
:11
:06
:13
:07
:U
:04
:08
:07
:09
:26
:10
:20
:07
:08
:08
:04
:08
:07
:06
:02
:05
:07
:06
:04
:26
:09
:08
:07
:08
:08
:14
:28
                                          —97~            »U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE:1973 M4-156/356

-------
SELECTED WATER
RESOURCES ABSTRACTS
INPUT TRANSACTION FORM
           W
   INTERACTION BETWEEN MARINE  ORGANISMS AND OIL POLLUTION
           5,  K -artDs.f

           6.
           H.  Pt.' formic r Oigasi ztion.
   Blumer, Max; Hunt, John  M.;  Atema, Jelle, and Stein, Lauren
   Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution
   Woods Hole, Massachusetts  02543
             18080 EBN
                                                                13.
                                                                    Period Coveted
 12.  Sponsoring Or
                     Environmental Protection Agency report
                     number EPA-R3-73-042, May 1973
   Part I of this project has established that fossil hydrocarbons can be distinguished
   from biogenic hydrocarbons in living organisms.  Hydrocarbons are stable in marine
   organisms and sediments and can move unaltered through several trophic levals.  Only
   very low levels  of organic stimuli are necessary for chemical communication—a
   mechanism especially prone to interference by pollutants.

   Part II has  established that a low level of crude oil  (0.9 milliliters/liter)
   interferes with  the timing of feeding behavior in the  lobster (Homarus americanus).
   Water soluble fractions (in the 50 ppb range) did not  affect feeding behavior.
   Added oil reduced the lipids as well as alkane and alkene-aromatic content of
   aquaria.  Degradation of added oil followed the usual  pathways of evaporation,
   dissolution, oxidation, polymerization, and metabolism.
  -*Behavior,*Oil,  Analytical Techniques, Gas Chromatography, Degradation  (Decomposition)
   *Path  of  Pollutants,  Hydrocarbon, Feeding
  t"b. Identifiers
  >7<:  f*-WKP 'field A- Group   0SC
                         19. S'~>-at!tyC;3.s$,
                            (Report)

                         20  Security Class.
21. If a, of
   Pages

22 P:ice
Send To:

WATER RESOURCES SCIENTIFIC INFORMATION CENTER
US DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
WASHINGTON, D. C. 2O24O
              C.  S.  Hegre
                                                     National Marine Water Quality Lab.

-------