United States
E^vironmentd Pro'ect'On
Agency
OH.ce of Radiation Programs
Eastern Environmental
Radiation Facility
P O Box 3009
Montgomery AL 36193
EPA 520 1-83-007
June 1983
c/EPA
Radiation
Potential Health and
Environmental Hazards of
Uranium Mine Wastes
Appendixes
Report To The Congress
Of The United States
f
1
\
I
Volume 3 of 3 Volumes
-------
EPA 520/1-6-83-007
POTENTIAL HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL
HAZARDS OF URANIUM MINE WASTES
Appendixes
A Report to the Congress of the United States
in Response to Public Law 95-604
June 10, 1983
U.S Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Radiation Programs
Washington, D.C. 20460
-------
CONTENTS
Appendixes
A. Summary of Federal Laws Potentially Affecting Uranium Mining
B. Federal Water Programs and Rights Activities
C. Congressionally Approved Compacts that Apportion Water
D. State Laws, Regulations, and Guides for Uranium Mining
E. Active Uranium Mines in the United States
F. Inactive Uranium Mines in the United States
G. General Observations of Uranium Mine Sites in Colorado,
New Mexico, Texas, and Wyoming
H. Influence of Mine Drainage on Seepage to Groundv/ater
and Surface Water Outflow
I. Computation of Mass Emission Factors for Wind Erosion
J. Aquatic Dosimetry and Health Effects Models and Parameter
Values
K. Airborne Pathway Modeling
L. Health Risk Assessment Methodology
-------
FIGURES
Appendix G Page
G.I Plan viev/ of inactive underground uranium nine No. 1, related
waste rock piles, and surface gamma exposure rates, Uravan
Mineral Belt, Colorado ...... G-3
G.2 Sectional view of inactive underground uranium mine No. 2,
related waste rock piles, and surface gamma exposure rates,
Uravan Mineral Belt, Colorado ..... G-4
G.3 Plan view of inactive underground uranium mine No. 3,
related waste rock piles, and surface gamma exposure rates,
Uravan Mineral Belt, Colorado ..... G-6
G.4 Sectional view of inactive underground uranium mine No. 4,
related waste rock piles, and surface gamma exposure rates,
Uravan Mineral Belt, Colorado ..... G-7
G.5 Plan viev/ of inactive underground uranium mine No. 5,
related waste rock piles, and surface gamma exposure rates,
Uravan Mineral Belt, Colorado ..... G-8
G.6 Plan view of inactive underground uranium mine No. 6,
related waste rock piles, and surface gamma exposure rates,
Uravan Mineral Belt, Colorado ..... G-9
G.7 Plan view of inactive underground uranium mine No. 7,
related waste rock piles, and surface gamma exposure rates,
Central City District, Colorado . . . . G-ll
G.8 Plan view of inactive underground uranium mine No. 8,
related waste rock piles, and surface gamma exposure rates,
Central City District, Colorado . . . . G-12
G.9 Plan view of inactive underground fluorspar uranium mine No. 9,
related waste rock piles, and surface gamma exposure rates,
near Jamestown, Colorado . . . . . G-13
G.10 Plan view of inactive underground uranium mine No. 10, related
waste rock piles, and surface gamma exposure rates, Central
City District, Colorado . . . . . G-15
ii
-------
Page
G.ll Typical mine waste pile associated with a small- to medium-
sized inactive underground uranium mine, Uravan Mineral
Belt, Colorado ....... G-16
6.12 Side view of typical underground uranium mine located on
the rim of a sandstone mesa, Uravan Mineral Belt, Colorado G-16
G.I3 Mine waste accumulations near the portal of a typical
underground rim-type uranium mine, western Colorado . G-17
G.14 Mine waste dump associated with a typical rim-type
underground uranium mine, western Colorado . . G-17
G.I5 Movement of fluorspar-uranium mine wastes from a tailings
pile into a stream, Jamestown area, Colorado . . G-19
G.16 1972 aerial photograph of the Galen and Pawelek open pit
mines, Karnes County, Texas ..... G-27
G.I7 1978 aerial photograph of the Galen and Pawelek open pit
mines, Karnes County, Texas ..... G-27
G.I8 Results of gamma exposure rate survey at the 1601 pit and
environs, Morton Ranch uranium mine, Converse County,
Wyoming ........ G-31
G.19 Location of sampling stations at the Morton Ranch mine,
South Powder River Basin, Wyoming .... G-33
G.20 Sample locations for radionuclides and select trace metals
in sediments, San Mateo mine, New Mexico . . . G-34
Appendix H
H.I Wyoming model area sub-basin drainage system . . H-3
H.2 Model area stream cross section .... H-3
H.3 New Mexico model area sub-basin drainage system . . H-9
Appendix J
J.I Surface stream flow pattern within drainage area . J-3
J.2 Conservation of mass relationship for resuspension model J-13
iii
-------
TABLES
Appendix A Page
A.I Federal laws, regulations, and guides for uranium mining A-l
Appendix D
D.I State laws, regulations, and guides for uranium mining D-l
Appendix E
E.I Active uranium mines in the United States . . . E-l
Appendix F
F.I Inactive uranium mines in the United States . . . F-l
Appendix G
G.I Uravan and Jamestown areas ...... G-14
G.2 Inactive uranium mine sites surveyed in New Mexico . . G-21
G.3 Status and location of uranium mines in Texas . . . G-25
G.4 Trace elements and radionuclides in water in the south
fork of Box Creek drainage at UNC Morton Ranch lease . G-35
G.5 Radionuclides and trace metals in sediments in the south
fork of Box Creek at UNC Morton Ranch lease . . . G-36
G.6 Radionuclides and trace metals in soils near the 1601
open pit mine, UNC Morton Ranch lease, Wyoming . . Q-37
G.7 Radionucl'ides and trace metals in soil profiles at the
open pit mines, UNC Morton Ranch lease, Wyoming . . Q-38
G.8 Radionuclides and trace metals in sediments from the
drainage of the San Mateo mine and from San Mateo Creek,
New Mexico ....... Q_^Q
G.9 Radium-226 and trace elements in water from San Mateo Creek
near San Mateo mine discharge point . G_40
iv
-------
Appendix H Page
H.I Characteristics of the sub-basin containing the model
mines H-2
H.2 Seepage and outflow calculations for the Wyoming model
mine drainage system ....... H-6
H.3 Characteristics of the sub-basin hydrographic unit in the
model underground uranium mine area .... H-8
H.4 Seepage and outflow calculations for the New Mexico
model mine area drainage system . . . . H-ll
Appendix J
J.I Aquatic environmental transport pathways examined . . J-6
J.2 Characteristics of the generic sites .... J-20
J.3 Stream data for Valencia County ..... J-23
J.4 Estimation of meat production in Valencia County for
1977 ......... J-25
J.5 Estimates of meat production in Converse County, Wyoming
for 1976 ......... J-26
J.6 Annual radionuclide release rates to streams for active
uranium nines ........ J-29
J.7 Freshwater fish concentration factors .... J-29
J.8 Normalized human intake rate factors for radionuclide
uptake via plant root systems . . . . . J-31
J.9 Irrigated land usage ....... J-31
J.10 Soil removal rate constants and radioactive decay
constants ........ J-33
J.ll Milk and beef concentration factors .... J-33
J.12 Dose equivalent conversion factors . . . . J-36
J.I3 Health effects conversion factors for internal pathways . J-37
J.14 Health effects conversion factors for external pathways . J-37
AppendixK
K.I Characteristics of the generic sites . . . K-l
-------
Page
K.2 Animal and vegetable crop distribution for use with
AIRDOS-EPA K-3
K.3 Sources of food for the maximum individual (percent) . K-4
K.4 Selected input parameters to AIRDOS-EPA . . . K-5
K.5 Selected terrestrial pathway parameters by radionuclide . K-7
K.6 Effective radioactive decay constants .... K-8
Appendix L
L.I Radionuclide dose rate and health effect risk conversion
factors used in uranium mine assessments . . . L-4
L.2 Additional input data used by DARTAB in the health impact
assessment of airborne emissions ..... L-21
L.3 Example input data file for DARTAB .... 1-22
L.4 Maximum individual fatal cancer risk for one year of
exposure to atmospheric radioactive emissions from model
uranium mines ........ L-23
L.5 Fatal cancer risk to an average individual in the regional
population for one year of exposure to atmospheric
radioactive emissions from model uranium mines . . L-24
L.6 Fatal cancer risk to the population for one year of
exposure to atmospheric radioactive emissions from model
uranium mines ........ L-25
L.7 . Genetic effect risk to descendants of maximum exposed
individual for one year of parental exposure to atmospheric
radioactive particulate and Rn-222 emissions from model
uranium mines ....... L-26
L.8 Genetic effect risk to descendants of average individual
of the population for one year of parental exposure to
atmospheric radioactive particulate and Rn-222 emissions
from model uranium mines . . . . ^ _
VI
-------
Page
L.9 Genetic effect risk to descendants of the regional
population for one year of parental exposure to atmospheric
radioactive particulates and Rn-222 emissions from model
uranium mines ........ L-28
VII
-------
APPENDIX A
FEDERAL LAWS, REGULATIONS, AND GUIDES FOR
URANIUM MINING
-------
Table A.I Federal laws, regulations, and guides for uranium mining
General
Conservation-
Water Preservation
Federal Agency Use Statutes
Mining
Permits Environmental Quality
Exploration Mining Water Land
Rights Rights Air Surf UG Solids Reclam.
Health
and
Safety
Dept. of Int. 1 2,3,4,6,7
BIA(a)
BLM(a) 5
USGS(a)
Dept. of Energy 2
Dept. of Agr. 1 2,8d
USFS(a)
EPA 1 2
AIR-OAQPS^a)
Water
Surface OWPS(a^
Ground OSW
Land-OSW
Radiation-ORP(a)
U.S. Army
Corps, of Engrs. 1 2
Dept. of Labor 2
MSHA(a)
OSHA(a)
Nuclear Reg.
Comm. ' 2
8 8 2,8
99 9
10 10 10
9 9
11 11 2
2,8d
12,13 13 12
16 19 2
14
17
19
18 18 18 18
15 15 15 15 15
16 2
2 23(b) 23(b) 23(b) 23(b>
20
20
22
21
23
-------
Table A.I (continued)Key to Federal laws, regulations and guides cited
1. See Appendix B and Appendix C for U.S. Constitution Citations, Federal Laws, and Interstate Compacts
2. National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (Public Law 92-190)
3. Endangered Species Act of 1973 (Public Law 93-205) (Supplants Endangered Species Conservation Act of 1969)
4. National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 (Public Law 89-655) (Supplants Antiquities Act of 1906)
5. Federal Land Management and Policy Act of 1976
6. Reservoir Salvage Act of 1960 (16 USCA 469-469C)
7. Historic Sites Acts of 1935 (16 USCA 21-50)
8. a. U.S. Mining Law of 1872 (30 USC 21-50)
b. Mineral Leasing Act of 1920 (30 USC 181 et seq)
c. Mineral Leasing Act for Acquired Lands (Amended) (30 USC 351-359)
d. Materials Act of 1947 (Amended) (30 USC 601-602)
e. Reorganization Plan of 1946 (60 Stat. 1099)
9. Indian Land - 30 CFR 231
10. Public Land - 30 USC 22 (43 CFR 3810, 3746, 3501, 3814.1)
11. Withdrawn Public Land - 42 USC 2097
12. National Forest Land - 16 USC 478 (43 CFR 3811.1 and 36 CFR 252)
13. National Forest Management Act of 1976 (16 USC 1600) - Regulations for land and resource management
planning under this Act in the National Forest System are given in Federal Register Volume 44,
Number 181, September 17, 1979
14. Clean Air Act as Amended (42 USC 1857 et seq)
15. Public Health Services Act (Reorganization No. 3, 1970; Section 301 - Environmental Monitoring)
-------
Table A.I (continued)Key to Federal laws, regulations and guides cited
16. Marine Protection Research and Sanctuaries Act of 1972
17. Federal Water Pollution Control Act as Amended (33 USC 466 et seq)
'18. Resource Recovery and Conservation Act of 1976 (Proposed 40 CFR 250.46-4)
19. Safe Drinking Water Act Amended (Public Law 95-523 and Public Law 95-190) (Could affect mining operation
where injection of wastes is utilized)
20. Atomic Energy Act Amended (Public Law 86-373; 42 USC 2021(h), Federal Radiation Guidance functions from
prior Federal Radiation Council)
21. Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970
22. MSHA formed by transferring MESA from DOI to DOL pursuant to the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977,
Public Law 91-173 as amended by Public Law 95-164
23. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Guides and Regulations for Benefication Processes
a. Regulatory Guide 3.5, Standard Format and Content of License Applications for Uranium Mills
(Nov. 1977)
b. Regulatory Guide 3.8, Preparation of Environmental Reports for Uranium Mills (Sept. 1978)
c. Regulatory Guide 3.11, Design, Construction, and Inspection of Embankment Retention Systems for
Uranium Mills (Dec. 1977)
d. Regulatory Guide 4.14, Measuring, Evaluating, and Reporting Radioactivity in Releases of Radioactive
Materials in Liquid and Airborne Effluents from Uranium Mills (June 1977)
e. Regulatory Guide 4.15, Quality Assurance for Radiological Monitoring Programs (Normal Operations) -
Effluent Streams and the Environment (Feb. 1979)
f. Regulatory Guide 8.11, Applications of Bioassay for Uranium (June 1975)
g. Regulatory Guide 8.13, Instruction Concerning Prenatal Radiation Exposure
h. Standards for Protection Against Radiation (10 CFR 20)
i. Domestic Licensing of Source Material (10 CFR 40)
j. Licensing and Regulatory Policy and Procedures for Environmental Protection (10 CFR 51)
k. Proposed Regulations: Uranium Mill Tailings Licensing (10 CFR Parts 40,150) - 44 F.R.
50012, August 24, 1979
CO
-------
Table A.I (continued)Key to Federal laws, regulations, and guides cited
1. Staff Technical Positions: Tailings Management - "Current U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Licensing Review Process: Uranium Mill Tailings Management"; Environmental Monitoring - "Pro-
posed Branch Position for Operational Radiological Environmental Monitoring Programs for
Uranium Mills"
m. Proposed Regulatory Guide 3.11.1, Operational Inspection and Surveillance of Imbankment Reten-
tion Systems for Uranium Mill Tailings (April 1979)
-------
APPENDIX B
FEDERAL WATER PROGRAMS AND RIGHTS ACTIVITIES
AND THEIR LEAD ADMINISTRATIVE AGENCIES
-------
B-l
Water use authorities and lead federal agencies
Authority
1. U.S. Constitution: Article I, Sections 8 and 10
Article II, Section 2
Article IV, Section 2
2. Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899 (33 USC 401-411)
3. Reclamation Act of 1902 (Public Law 57-161)
4. Federal Water Power Act of 1920, as amended (Public Law 66-280)
5. Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act of 1958 (Public Law 86-624)
6. Wilderness Act of 1964 (Public Law 88-577)
7. Water Resources Planning Act of 1964 (Public Law 89-90) (Council: DOI,
DOA, U.S. Army, HEW, DOT, FERC, DOC, HUD, EPA)
8. Wild and Scenic Rivers Act of 1968, as amended (Public Law 90-542)
9. Colorado River Basin Act of 1968 (Public Law 90-537)
10. National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (Public Law 91-190)
11. Federal Water Pollution Control Act of 1972 (Public Law 92-500)
12. Marine Protection, Research and Sanctuaries Act of 1972 (Public Law 92-532)
13. Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972 (Public Law 92-583)
14. Endangered Species Act of 1973 (Public Law 93-205)
15. Mexican Water Treaty of 1944
16. Colorado River Basin Salinity Control Act (Public Law 93-320)
17. Treaty of 1909 with Canada
18. Columbia River Treaty with Canada
Lead or Responsible Agencies (Authorities)
Army Corps of Engineers (2, 7, 10, 12)
Department of Interior (3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 14, 16)
Department of Agriculture (7,10)
Department of HEW (7, 10)
Department of Transportation (7, 10)
Department of Commerce (7, 10, 13)
Department of HUD (7, 10)
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (4, 7, 10, 16)
Environmental Protection Agency, (7, 10, 11, 12)
Department of State (1, 15, 17, 18)
Source: Environmental Study on Uranium Mills, TRW, Inc., USEPA
Contract No. 68-03-2560, February 1979.
-------
APPENDIX C
CONGRESSIONALLY APPROVED INTERSTATE WATER COMPACTS
-------
C-l
Interstate water compacts
Name Year
Arkansas River Compact 1948
Arkansas River Basin Compact 1965
Bear River Compact 1955
Belle Fourche River Compact 1943
Canadian River Compact 1950
Colorado River Compact 1922
Connecticut River Flood Control Compact 1951
Costilla Creek Compact 1963
Delaware River Basin Compact 1961
Great Lakes Basin Compact 1955
Klamath River Basin Compact 1957
La Plata River Compact 1922
Merrimack River Flood Control Compact 1956
New England Interstate Water Pollution Control Compact 1947
New York Harbor (Tri-State) Interstate Sanitation Compact 1935
Ohio River Valley Water Sanitation Compact 1939
Pecos River Compact 1948
Potomac River Basin Compact 1939
Red River of the North Compact 1937
Republican River Compact 1942
Rio Grande Compact 1938
Sabine River Compact 1953
Snake River Compact 1949
South Platte River Compact 1923
Susquehanna River Basin Compact 1970
Tennessee River Basin Water Pollution Control Compact 1955
Thames River Flood Control Compact 1957
Upper Colorado River Basin Compact 1948
Wheeling Creek Watershed Protection and Flood Prevention
District Compact 1967
Yellowstone River Compact 1950
Source: Environmental Study on Uranium Mills, TRW, Inc., USEPA Contract
No. 68-03-2560, February 1979.
-------
APPENDIX b
STATE LAWS, REGULATIONS, AND GUIDES
FOR URANIUM MINING
-------
Table D.I State laws, regulations, and guides for uranium mining
NRC
General
Mining
NPDES Permits
Agreement Permit Water Exploration Minin
State State State Use Rights Right
COLORADO Yes
Department of Health
Water Quality Control Div.
Air Quality Control Div.
Department of Natural Resources
Div. of Water Reserves (State
Board of Land Commissioners
Mined Land Reel am. Bd.
Division of Mines
NEW MEXICO Yes
State Land Commission
Dept. of Energy and Minerals
Dept. of Natural Resources
Env. Improvement Div.
TEXAS Yes
Dept. of Water Resources
R.R. Commission of Texas
General Land Office
Dept. of Health
Air Control Board
UTAH No
State Engineer
Dept. of Social Services
Division of Health
Water Pollution Control Bd.
Yes
15
1
2,3
No - -
- - 1
3
No - -
13
1
14
_
_
No
3,4
.
_
_
1
2,3
1
3
1
14
-
-
_
-
-
-
-
g Air
s
Environmental Quality
Water Land
Surf
UG Solids Reel am
6,7,8,10 8,9,10 -
4,5 ...
1
2,3 2,3 - 2,3
2
5,6,7,8,9 10,12,13,14 11 14
.
5
-
-
12
-
-
6
-
8,9
5
-
6,10
-
_
-
-
1
1
4,11 4
2,7 - 2
15
_
.
-
. _
-
1
1
. Safety
14
9
16
_
H.
_
10
_
5
_
Dept. of Natural Resources
a
i
-------
Table D.I (continued)
State
GENERAL
NRC
Agreement
State
Mininq
NPDES
Pe rmi t
State
Permits
Water
Use
Exploration
Rights
Mining
Rights
Air
Surt
Environmenta
Water
UG
1 Quality
Land
Solids Reel am.
Safety
WASHINGTON Yes
Dept. of Natural Resources
Dept. of Ecology
Office of Water Programs
Dept. of Social Services & Health
Health Services Division
Air Quality Division
Yes
1.2
2 2
(No)
WYOMING
State Inspector of Mines
State Engineers Office
Dept. of Env. Quality
Air Quality Div.
Water Quality Div.
Land Quality Div.
Solid Waste Management
No
Yes
8a
3c
8a
3c
3a,4
2,5
5,6
8d
3c,7 3c,7
3d
8c
o
i
PO
-------
Table D.I (continued)--Key to State laws, regulations, and guides cited
Colorado
1. Mining Rules and Regulations, 1973, 1976; Uranium Mining Lease and Prospecting Permit; State Board of
Land Commissioners.
2. Colorado Mined Land Reclamation Act, July 1, 1976; Mined Land Reclamation Board (Act. 32, Title 34,
C.R.S. 1973, as amended).
3. Rules and Regulations, Colorado Mined Land Reclamation Board; effective July 1978.
4. Colorado Air Quality Control Act of 1979, adopted June 20, 1979. Replaces Colorado Air Pollution
Control Act of 1970. Radioactive materials included in list of air pollutants.
5. Colorado Air Quality Control Regulations and Ambient Air Quality Standards, Colorado Air Pollution
Control Commission. Specifically, Regulation No. 1, Emission Control Regulations for Particulates,
Smokes, and Sulfur Oxides for the State of Colorado; and Regulation No. 3, Regulation Governing Air
Contaminant Emission Notice, Emission Permit, and Fees for Direct Sources.
6. Regulations Establishing Basic Standards and an Antidegradation Standard and Establishing a System
for Classifying State Waters, for Assigning Standards, and for Granting Temporary Modifications,
Colorado Water Quality Control Commission, May 22, 1979; effective July 10, 1979.
7. Regulations for Effluent Limitations, Colorado Department of Health, Water Quality Control Commission;
adopted March 18, 1975 effective August 21, 1975.
8. Regulations for the State Discharge Permit System, Colorado Department of Health, Water Quality Control
Commission; adopted November 19, 1974 effective January 31, 1975, amended February 7, 1978.
9. Rules for Subsurface Disposal Systems, Colorado Department of Health, Water Quality Control Commission;
revised July 6, 1976, effective October 1, 1977.
10. Guidelines for Control of Water Pollution from Mine Drainage, November 10, 1979; Water Pollution Con-
trol Commission (Ch 66, Act. 28, C.R.S. 1963 as amended 1970).
11. Colorado Rules and Regulations Pertaining to Radiation Control, April 1, 1978, Uranium Mill Licensing
Guide, May 1978; Radioactive Materials License; Radiation and Hazardous Wastes Control Division
(Title 25, Act. II, C.R.S. 1973, Radiation Control).
co
-------
Table D.I (continued)Key to State laws, regulations, and guides cited.
12. Guidelines for the Design, Operation, and Maintenance of Mill Tailings Ponds to Prevent Water
Pollution, March 13, 1968; Water Pollution Control Commission (Colorado Water Pollution Control
Act of 1966, Ch. 44, Session Laws 1966 as amended by Ch. 217).
13. Publication of a Regulation Providing Tailings Piles from Uranium and Thorium Mills be Adequately
Stabilized or Removed, Colorado Department of Public Health; effective June 10, 1966.
14. Colorado Division of Mines responsible for health and safety standards for uranium mines and mills.
Regulations contained in Bulletin 20: Section 108 - "Missed HolesMisfires," Section 110 -
"Mucking," Section 12.2 "Radiation Control," Section 130 - "Safeguards," Section 140 - "Shafts
and Raises."
15. Office of State Engineer, Division of Water Resources (Article 16, Section 5 - Colorado Constitution
and Title 37, Article 90, Section 137 - Colorado Revised Statutes, 1973).
-------
Table D.I (continued)Key to State laws, regulations, and guides cited
New Mexico
1. State Land. Leased by State Land Commission, 19-8-14 NMSA 1978.
2. State and Private Land. Mine plan filed and approved by State Mining Inspector, 67-5-1 et seq.
NMSA 1978.
3. Water Permit issued by State Engineer; 72-5-1 et seq. NMSA 1978 and 72-12-1 NMSA 1978 and Desert
Lands Act of 1866 as amended and 43 USC 383.
4. NRC agreement State Under 42 USC 2021. License required for source material: unrefined and un-
processed ore is not included. Specific License required for Mills, 10 CFR 40.20 - 40.31. Ad-
ministered by Environmental Improvement Division (EID).
5. New Mexico delegated responsibilities and powers under Clean Air Act (40 CFR 52.1620).
Ambient Air Quality Standards and Air Quality Control Regulations, State of New Mexico Health
Department, Environmental Improvement Division; reissued November 1976.
6. Application for Permit and Certificate of Registration General Form for Sources Located Within
the State of New Mexico, New Source Review Section, Air Quality Section, Environmental Improve-
ment Division, revised February 1976.
7. Application for Permit to Construct or Modify and Certificate of Registration for Mineral Pro-
cessing Plants Located within the State of New Mexico, New Source Review Section, Air Quality
Section, Environmental Improvement Division, revised February 1976.
8. Supplementary Information and Notes for Use with Application for Permit and Certificate of
Registration for Mineral Processing Plants, State of New Mexico - Environmental Improvement
Division, Air Quality Section, New Source Review Section.
9. Monitoring Air Quality in Mines and Mills Underground: State Mine Inspector 69-5-7 NMSA 1978
also MSHA (30 CFR 57.5-37) Restricted Areas: Mills, EID, 74-2-13 NMSA 1978 Unrestricted Areas:
EID per Clean Air Act (42 USC 7410) and State Radiation Protection Act (74-2-1 et seq. NMSA 1978).
10. New Mexico Water Quality: Not NPDES approved by EPA. State does not require permit per 74-6-5
NMSA 1978 and parts 2-100 of N.M. Water Quality Regulations if EPA issues NPDES permit.
11. Underground Water. State EID regulates pollution of underground water per 74-6-1 et seq. NMSA 1978.
o
en
-------
Table D.I (continued)Key to State laws, regulations, and guides cited
12. Water Quality - Radioactivity: Mines by EID according to Sec. 2-101(b) of N.M. Water Quality
Regulations; Mills by EID per NRC 10 CFR 20.106 and Appendix B.
13. Water Quality Standards on Enforcement: EPA enforces under NPDES system for effluent streams
entering surface water of United States: EID enforces N.M. groundwater standards under N.M. Water
Quality Control Act, 74-6-1 et seq. NMSA 1978.
14. Amended Water Quality Control Commission Regulation, Parts 1,2,3, and 4, Water Quality Control
Commission; January 11, 1977, as amended June 14, 1977 and November 8, 1977.
Water Quality Standards for Interstate and Intrastate Streams in New Mexico, Water Quality Control
Commission under the authority of Paragraph C, Section 74-6-4 of the New Mexico Water Quality Act
(Chapter 326, Laws of 1973, as amended); adopted August 22, 1973, revised September 29, 1975,
January 13, 1976, February 8, 1977 and March 14, 1978.
15. New Mexico Environmental Improvement Agency Uranium Mill License Application Guidelines,
Radiation Protection Section; September 1977.
16. (a) Radiation Protection Act, Chapter 185 Laws of 1959 (as amended by Chapter 284 Laws of 1971
and by Chapter 343 Laws of 1977).
(b) New Mexico Environmental Improvement Agency Regulations for Governing the Health and Environ-
mental Aspects of Radiation, Environmental Improvement Board, June 16, 1973.
a
i
o>
-------
Table D.I (continued)Key to State laws, regulations, and guides cited
Texas
1. Texas Uranium Surface Mining and Reclamation Act (May 1978), Rules of the Surface Mining and
Reclamation Division. The Railroad Commission of Texas, July 1, 1979.
2. Surface Mining Permit Rule 102 - Elements of Permit Application, Rule 250 Reclamation Plan; Rules
of the Surface Mining and Reclamation Division.
3. Application for Permit to Conduct In Situ Uranium Mining, Instructions and Procedural Information for
Filing an Application for a Permit to Conduct In Situ Mining of Uranium, Texas Department of Water
Resources.
4. Technical Report for In Situ Uranium Mining, Texas Department of Water Resources.
5. Surface Mining Permit, Rule 108 - Permit Approval (Rules of the Surface Mining and Reclamation
Division). Permit shall be granted if application complies with Permit rules and all applicable
Federal and State laws. Permit may be approved conditioned upon approval of all other required
State permits or licenses.
6. Texas Department of Health (TDH) issues licenses for surface mining, in situ mining, milling and
processing of uranium ores and leachates in accordance with NRC Agreement.
7. TDH implements U.S. Safe Drinking Water Act regarding public water supplies. The underground injection
portion of SDWA is regulated by the Railroad Commission (Oil and Gas), Department of Water Resources
(in situ mining of uranium, salt, and sulfur).
8. Texas Regulations for Control of Radiation and Texas Water Quality Standards apply to surface water
throughout state.
9. Texas Department of Water Resources issues "no discharge" permits to all uranium in situ extraction
processes.
10. Texas Radiation Control Act, 1971. Texas Regulations for Control of Radiation (TDH).
11. Texas Solid Waste Disposal Act, 1969 (Texas Department of Water Resources). Rules pertaining
to Industrial Solid Waste Management, March 3, 1978.
12. Texas Air Control Board. Air Control Board H-76 bill introduced February 1, 1979 to include
radioactive material in the definition of air contaminant and allow Board to charge fees for
permits and variances.
-------
Table D.I (continued)--Key to State laws, regulations, and guides cited
13. Texas Water Code, Chapter 2 - "Water Use" - Texas Department of Water Resources.
14. Rules and Regulations for Prospecting and Mining State-owned minerals. General Land Office Rules
12.6.18.03.001-.006 (Feb. 17, 1976).
15. Texas Uranium Surface Mining and Reclamation, General Land Office Rules 135.18.05.001-.005.
o
I
CD
-------
Table D.I (continued)Key to State laws, regulations, and guides cited
Utah
1. Utah Water Pollution Control Act, Utah State Divison of Health.
(a) Wastewater Disposal Regulations, Part I, Definitions and General Requirements, State of Utah,
Department of Social Services, Division of Health; adopted by Utah Water Pollution Control Board,
May 18, 1965, Utah State Board of Health, May 19, 1965, (Revised by Utah Water Pollution Control
Committee, Nov. 2, 1978) under authority of 26-15-4 to 5 and 73-14-1 to 13, Utah Code annotated,
1953, as amended.
(b) Wastewater Disposal Regulations, Part II, Standards of Quality for Waters of the State, State
of Utah Department of Social Services, Division of Health; adopted by Utah Water Pollution Control
Board May 18, 1965, Utah State Board of Health May 19, 1965, revised by action of the Boards June 2, 1967
and June 21, 1967, further revised by action of the Utah Water Pollution Committee September 13, 1973, and
by action of the Utah State Board of Health October 23, 1978.
(c) Wastewater Disposal Regulations, Part III, Sewers and Wastewater Treatment works. Consideration of
Waste stabilization Ponds (Lagoons) for Industrial Wastes is subject to requirements determined from
analysis of the engineers report and other available pertinent information in addition to sections 83-91.
(d) Wastewater Disposal Regulations, Part IV, Individual Wastewater Disposal Systems.
(e) Wastewater Disposal Regulations, Part V, Small Underground Wastewater
Disposal Systems.
2. Changes and Additions to the General Rules and Regulations, adopted by the Board of Oil, Gas and
Mining; March 22, 1978, effective June 1, 1978.
(a) Rule M-3 Notice of Intention to Commence Mining Operations.
(b) Rule M-10 -- Reclamation Standards.
3. Water Laws of Utah and Interstate Compacts and Treaties (Second Edition, 1964).
4. State Engineer, H..B. No. 167 - "Temporary Applications to Appropriate Water" - introduced in the
1979 General Session, an act enacting Section 73-3-5.5, Utah Code Annotated 1953.
o
10
-------
Table D.I (continued)Key to State laws, regulations, and guides cited
5. Utah Radiation Protection Act; Utah Code Annotated, 1953; Title 26, Chapter 25 - Radiation Control.
6. Utah Air Conservation Regulations, State of Utah, Department of Social Services, Division of Health;
adopted by the Utah Air Conservation Committee and the Utah State Board of Health September 26, 1971;
revised January 23, 1972; July 9, 1975; May 22, 1977; February 1979; under authority of 26-15-5 and
26-24-5 Utah Code annotated, 1953, as amended.
o
I
-------
Table D.I (continued)Key to State laws, regulations, and guides cited
Washington
1. Mineral Leasing Laws, Revised 1965. (Laws cover surface and underground but not in situ and heap
leaching).
2. Rules and Regulations Relating to Protection and Restoration of Lands disturbed through Surface
Mining, October 20, 1970 (Surface - Mined Land Reclamation Act, Ch 64, 1970, Sec. 5 RCW 78.44
only applies to surface mining on private and state-owned lands).
3. Rules and Regulations for Radiation Protection, Chapter-402-22 WAC, Specific Licenses.
4. Rules and Regulations for Radiation Protection, Sec. 402-24-220 WAC, Concentrations in Air and
Water for Release to Restricted and Unrestricted Areas. -
5. Rules and Regulations for Radiation Protection, Chapter 402-24 WAC,
Standards For Protection Against Radiation.
6. Rules and Regulations for Radiation Protection, Chapter 402-52 WAC, Uranium and/or Thorium
Mill Operation and Stabilization of Mill Tailings Piles.
7. Clean Air Act, Revised Washington Administrative Code, Rev., Chapter 70.94, RCW.
8. Water Quality Standards, State of Washington, Department of Ecology; June 19, 1973. (Revised
Dec. 19, 1977). Water Pollution Control Act of 1970 (as amended).
9. Department of Ecology - Water Use -
(a) Water Pollution Control: Chapter 90.48 RCW
(b) Water Code - 1917 Act: Chapter 90.03 RCW
(c) Regulations of Public Groundwaters: Chapter 90.44 RCW.
o
i
-------
Table D.I (continued)Key to State laws, regulations, and guides cited
Wyoming
1. Regulations and Instructions, Part I, Surface Water, Wyoming State Engineer's Office, revised
January 1974.
2. Condensed Detailed Instructions for Preparation of Surface Water Applications and Accompanying Maps
for Facilities (pollution control and others) for Mining and Other Industrial Operations, revised
4-28-78. Effluent Limitations and Monitoring Requirements: Wyoming's BPT for Uranium Mine Waters.
3. Wyoming Environmental Quality Act, as amended, Department of Environmental Quality: 1973 Cumulative
Supplement, 1974 Session Laws, 1975 Session Laws, 1976 Session Laws, 1977 Session Laws.
(a) Article 2 - Air quality Regulations.
(b) Article 3 - Water quality.
(c) Article 4 - Land Quality. Guidelines No. 1-6 and 8.
(d) Article 5 - Solid Waste Management.
4. Wyoming Air Quality Standards and Regulations, Department Environmental Quality, filed January 25, 1979.
5. Water Quality Rules and Regulations, Department of Environmental Quality: Chapter I, Quality Standards for
Wyoming Surface Waters, filed July 17, 1979; Chapter II, Discharges/Permit Regulations for Wyoming 1974;
Chapter IV, Regulations for Discharge of Oil and Hazardous Substances into Water of the State of Wyoming,
June 13, 1978.
6. Proposed Groundwater Regulations: WQD Chapter VIII, Quality Standards for Groundwater of Wyoming (1979);
WQD Chapter IX, Wyoming Groundwater Pollution Control Permit (1979).
7. Wyoming Land Quality Rules and Regulations, Department of Environmental Quality, filed October 6, 1978,
amended September 13, 1979.
8. State of Wyoming Non-Coal Mining Laws, Safety Rules and Regulations, Title 30Mines and Minerals.
(a) Chapter 1 - General Provisions
(b) Chapter 2 - Bureau of Mining Statistics
(c) Chapter 3 - Mining Operations Generally (Article 4 - Safety Regulations)
(d) Chapter 3 - Mining Operations Generally (Article 5 - Open Cut Land Reclamation) c
-------
APPENDIX E
ACTIVE URANIUM MINES IN
THE UNITED STATES
-------
ACTIVE URANIUM MINES IN THE UNITED STATES
SOUPCEl DOE, GRAND JUNCTION, COLORADO
PACE
MINE
CONTROLLER NA«E
COUNTY
*»*»**»* ARIZONA
KUTH 1 + 4
BLUE ROCK
no******************
SILVER CREEK IND
UOCO
******»«« COLORADO
SCHHAPTZWALDER M
BLACK MAMA
BONANZA
CEDAR PT.3-L.CHI
ELIZABETH 11*18
HUBBARD HMSTD PA
JULY
LA SAL 4
LIBERTY BELL
LUMSDEN 1
MINERAL CHAN 10+
KLB-C-G-26A
MLB-C-G-27
NEW VERDE
OCTOBER ADIT
PACK PAT 1 + 2
RAJAH 30 SHIFT
RAJAH 67 + 68
ROSEBUD
THORNTON
ZEE LSE.-RAJAH 4
BESSIE 2*3
MARGE GROUP
SAGE-BUELLA
BROKEN BOW
VCA NATURITA TAI
ADAK
APRIL
BLACK POINT
BLACKBURN
BLUE CAP
BOON DOCK
BREEZY
BUCKHORN-UREKA
CANON 4,S + 1
CLIFFDWELLER
COLHPADIUM
CRIPPLE CREEK 2
DONALD L
ECHO 2 + 3
ECHO 6
EQUINOX
COTTER CORP
INCE VNG co
ATLAS MINERALS
* S DAWSON
GULf STATES ENER
KUB8ARD MNG.
V. C. MOORES
PIONEER U"AV INC
MARION BIRCH
UNION CARBIDE CP
ATLAS-AMAX
RALPH FOSTER
FOSTER H-GOVTLSE
UNION CARBIDE CP
ATLAS-AMAX
UNION CARBIDE
UNION CARBIDE
UNION CARBIOE CP
GRAHAM MNG.
C V XOQDWARO
UNION CARBIDE
UNION CARBIDE CP
UNION CARBIDE CP
UNION CARPIDE CP
JOHN DUFUP
DURITA CORP,
CLEGKORN+WASHRUR
ATLAS MINERALS
UNION CARBIDE CP
UNION CARBIDE
GEO-ENERGY RES
EARL HOTZ
UNION CARBIDE CP
C + H MINING
E M COOPER
UNION CARPIDE
UNION CARBIDE CP
UNION CARBIDE CP
UNION CARBIDE
MICHAEL GREAGOR
GLEN GREAGOR
CLEGHORN+WASHBUR
NAVAJO
PIMA
JEFFERSON
MESA
MESA
MESA
MESA
MESA
MESA
MESA
MESA
MESA
MESA
MESA
MES»
MESA
MESA
MESA
MESA
MESA
MESA
MESA
MESA
MOFFAT
MOFFAT
MOFFAT
MONTEZUMA
MONTEZUMA
MONTROSE
MOMROSE
MONTROSE
MQNTROSE
MOKTROSE
MONTPOSE
MONTROSE
MONTROSE
MONTROSE
MONTROSE
MONT»OSE
MONTROSE
MONTROSE
MONTROSE
MONTROSE
MONTROSE
SCC. TOWNSHIP
17 ,N
25
20
26
23
29
35
12
36
36
36
7
15
9
36
1
36
36
31
6
ie
13
7
12
10
13
21
28
2S
10
21
24
21
21
21
3
3
12
2 S
51 N
51 N
51 N
SO N
51 N
50 N
51 N
51 K
51 N
50 N
50 N
SO N
51 N
50 N
51 N
51 N
51 N
51 N
7 N
48 N
45 N
46 N
46 N
28 S
45 N
48 N
48 N
48 N
47 H
47 N
47 N
45 N
45
48
RANGE
23.0 E
0
71.0 W
18.0 W
20.0 W
19.0 W
17.0 W
20.0 W
18. 0 W
20.0 N
19.0 K
20.0 W
17.0 W
0
0
18.0 N
19.0 W
20.0 W
20.0 W
20.0 W
19.0 W
19.0 N
19.0 W
94.0 W
95.0 W
94.0 W
0
0
18.0 W
18.0 W
11.0 M
17.0 W
26.0 E
0
11.0 W
19.0 W
11.0 W
18.0 W
17.0 w
17.0 *
17.0 W
11,0 H
18.0 H
18,0 N
MERID.
14
06
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
23
22
06
06
06
22
22
22
22
24
12
22
22
22
22
23
23
23
23
22
MINING
METHOD
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNOERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNKNOWN
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
TAIL.DMP
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERCRO
UNDCRGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERCRO
UNDERORO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
TOTAL PRODBCTION
(TONS AS OF 01/01/7
irOOO 100,000
100 - 1,000
MOO, 000
1,000 100,000
MOO, 000
1,000 - 100,000
1,000 - 100,000
1,000 - 100,000
1,000 - 100,000
1,000 - 100,000
1,000 100,000
1,000 - 100,000
1,000 - 100,000
100 - 1,000
MOO, 000
MOO, 000
1,000 100,000
1,000 - 100,000
MOO, 000
MOO, 000
loo - 1,000
1,000 - 100,000
MOO, 000
1,000 - 100,000
MOO, 000
MOO, 000
<100
too - 1,000
1,000 " 100,000
100 1,000
100 1,000
1,000 100.0CTO
1,000 - 100,000
100 1,000
1,000 * 100,000
1,000 » 100,000
1,000 - 100,000
1,000 - 100,000
1,000 - 100,000
1,000 - 100,000
1,000 100,000
1,000 - 100,000
1,000 - 100,000
1,000 - 100,000
DEPTH
(FT.)
ISO
50
650
100
400
300
5fr
250
50
450
150
100
so
too
400
300
450
200
(50
550
50
300
4SO
100
300
50
50
0
250
50
0
200
200
0
0
100
50
200
100
100
150
50
100
350
-------
ACTIVE URANIUM MINES IN THE UNITED ITATCS
80URCEI DOE, GRAND JUNCTION, COLORADO
PACE
MINE NAME
CONTROLLER NAME COUNT*
8CC. TOWNSHIP RANCE MERID.
MINING
METHOD
TOTAL PRODUCTION
-------
ACTIVE URANIUM MINES IN THE UNITED 5TATI8
SOURCE I DOE, GRAND JUNCTION, COLORADO
PACE
MINE NAME
CONTROLLER NAME
COUNTY
SEC. TOWNSHIP
****»*** COLORADO
(CONT'D) **«*»*****
BURRO
CARNATION
CIVET CAT GROUP
DEREMO-BIGLER SH
FALCON-BOB-OYLA
CMC
HANGOVER (SLRCK)
HAPPY OACKCSLKPC
LUCKY STRIKE
MAGPIE 2
MURIETTA
NORTH BURRC
POND
RADIUM 9,10,* 11
RADIUM GP-BLACKb
SEARS GROUP
SILVER BELL
SNYDER * PETERSO
STRAWBERRY ROAN
SUMMIT INCLINE I
SUN CUP (PUCKETT
SUNDAY GROUP
UINTAH
WILMARTH
WINDSWEPT
*****»*** NEW
ANN LEEC28. 14-95
BUCKY (14-14-10)
CLirTSIDE 36 14N
DOG-FLEA (20-13-
IX CIRCUIT GRANT
HAC 1 12,13-14,3
MINE WATER
HLB-NM-B-l
N E CHUPCHROCK
NAVAJO RES, NW
SANDSTONE(27-14-
SEC 1 13 9
SEC 12 14 10 SWO
SEC 12-15-14W2,N
SEC 18+20-14-9
SEC 19 14N 9W
SEC 19-13-09(HOP
SEC 21-15N-13K
SEC 2S-14N-10W
UNION CARBIDE
PIONEER URAV INC
EAGLE PEAK MNG C
UNION CARBIDE
ATLAS-FOOTE
UNION CARBIDE CO
LOWELL E ROCKWEL
MARION BIRCH
HANNERT MNG.
PIONEER UPAV INC
SHIPROCK.LTD
UNION CARBIDE CP
UNI01 CARBIDE CP
ATLAS-FOOTC
ATLAS-FOOTE
JOHN PERES
UNION CARBIDE CP
UNION CARBIDE
ATLAS MINERALS
ATLAS-AMAX
DOLORES BENCH LT
UNION CARBIDE CP
W. D. TRIPP
UNION CARBIDE CP
UNION CARBIDE CP
SAN MIGUEL
SAN MIGUEL
SAN MIGUEL
SAN MIGUEL
SAN MIGUEL
SAN HIGUEL
SAN MIGUEL
SAN MIGUEL
SAN MIGUEL
SAN MIGUEL
SAN MIGUEL
SAN MIGUEL
SAN MIGUEL
SAN 1IGUEL
SAN MIGUEL
S»N MIGUEL
SAN MIGUEL
SAN MIGUEL
SAN VIGUEL
SAN MIGUEL
SAN MIGUEL
SAN MIGUEL
SAN MIGUEL
SAN MIGUEL
SAN MIGUEL
MEXICO **»*»»»
UNITED NUCLEAR
COBS NUCLEAR INC
KERR-MCGEE CORP
M + M "INING CO
KERR MCGEE
UN - HOMESTAKE
UNITED NUC HOM
WARNOCK-GOVT LSE
UNITED NUCLEAR
KERR-MCGEE CORP,
UNITED NUCLEAR
KERR MCGCE
COBB NUCL IND
GULF MINERAL RES
KERR MCGEE
KERR-MCGEE CORP.
RANCHERS EXPL.
WESTERN NUCLEAR
UNITED NUC HOM
MCKINLEY
MCKINLEY
MCKINLEY
MCKINLEY
MCKINLEY
MCKINLEY
MCKINLEY
MCKINLEY
MCKINLEY
MCKINLEY
MCKINLEY
MCKINLEY
MCKINLEY
MCKINLEY
MCKINLEY
MCKINLEY
MCKINLEY
MCKINLEY
MCKINLEY
31
13
18
21
36
19
25
25
23
4
32
22
18
32
28
31
13
28
24
15
28
14
36
20
12
34
34
34
1
12
12
20
19
19
21
23
44 N
44 N
42 N
44 N
43 N
44 N
43 N
45 N
45 N
44 N
43 N
44 N
32 S
43 N
43 N
43 N
4 N
44 N
43 N
44 N
44 N
14 N
14 N
14 N
13 N
13 N
17 N
17 N
13 N
13 N
14 N
15 N
14 N
14 N
13 N
IS N
14 N
RANGE
11,0 W
11. 0 N
0
20.0 tf
0
1T.O W
19,0 W
20.0 W
1».0 W
18.0 W
18.0 W
0
17.0 K
19.0 W
19.0 W
0
26.0 E
18.0 N
19.0 W
19.0 W
1.7 W
18. 0 W
19.0 W
17.0 K
17.0 W
9.0 W
10.0 W
9.0 H
9.0 N
0-
14,0 W
0
0
16.0 K
17.0 W
9.0 W
9.0 W
10.0 W
14.0 W
9.0 W
9.0 K
9.0 W
13.0 W
10.0 w
MERID,
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
24
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
MINING
METHOD
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERORO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDCRGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNKNOWN
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDCRGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDCRGRO
UNDERGRO
MWATPROD
UNDERGRO
MHATPROD
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
TOTAL PRODUCTION
(TONS AS OF 01/01/7
MOO, 000
MOO, 000
1,000 - 100,000
MOO, 000
1,000 100,000
1,000 - 100,000
1,000 100,000
1,000 100,000
1,000 100,000
,000 - 100,000
,000 - 100,000
,000 - 100,000
,000 - 100,000
,000 - 100,000
,000 - 100,000
100 - 1,000
1,000 - 100,000
MOO, 000
1,000 » 100,000
1,000 100,000
1,000 - 100,000
MOO, 000
1,000 - 100,000
1,000 - 100,000
1,000 - 100,000
MOO, 000
MOO, 000
MOO, 000
MOO, 000
<100
1,000 > 100,000
-------
ACTIVE URANIUM MINES IN THE UNITED STATES
SOURCE! DOC, GRAND JUNCTION, COLORADO
PAOE
MINE NAKE
CONTROLLER NAME
COUNTY
SEC. TOWNSHIP
RANGE MERID.
MINING
METHOD
TOTAL PRODUCTION
(TONS AS Or 01/01/79)
DEPTH
(TT.)
«*»*«*** NEW MEXICO (CONT'D) *«»*««»
SEC 30,14-9(E »
SEC 32 ISN UX
SEC 35.14N-9W
SEC 3S,17h-16ioo,ooo
1,000 -
MOO.ono
1,000 -
1,000 -
MOO, 000
MOO, 000
MOO, 000
MOO, 000
MOO, 000
1,000 -
MOO, 000
MOO, 000
1,000 -
MOO, 000
MOO, 000
1,000 -
MOO. 000
MOO, 000
MOO, 000
MOO, 000
100,
100,
100,
100,
100,
too,
000
000
000
ooo
000
000
100,000
09
11
0
0
0
0
0
9
0
0
0
0
17,0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
15.0
0
SURFACE
IN-SITU
IN-SITU
IN-SITU
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
TAIL.DMP
SURFACE
8URFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
IN-SITU
SURFACE
IN-SITU
SURFACE
SURFACE
IN-SITU
MOO, 000
1,000 -
1,000 -
1,000 -
MOO, 000
1,000 -
1,000 -
MOO, 000
1,000 -
MOO, 000
MOO, 000
MOO, 000
MOO, 000
MOO, 000
MOO, 000
MOO, 000
MOO, 000
MOO, 000
MOO, 000
MOO, 000
100,000
100,000
<100
100,000
100,000
100,000
100,000
550
250
1200
1650
1350
300
50
500
500
850
50
200
250
700
650
1150
600
too
0
600
150
4SO
250
100
250
200
300
100
100
300
200
0
200
100
200
100
ISO
100
500
100
350
100
200
250
-------
ACTIVE URANIUM MINES IN THE UNITED STATES
SOURCEl DOE, GRAND JUNCTION, COLORADO
PACE
MINE NAME
CONTROLLER NAME ^ COUNTY
«EC. TOWNSHIP
RANGE MERIO.
MINING
METHOD
TOTAL PRODUCTION
(TONS AS OF 01/01/79)
DEPTH
(n.)
*»**»»«* TEXAS
MC LEAN-BOWMAN
SMITH,W,A. 2*670
IAMZOW
0"HERN LEA5E-75
(CONT'D) »»»«»
EXXON CO., USA
CONOCO-PIONEER
INTRNTNL ENERGY
MOBIL OIL CO
LIVE OAK
LIVE OAK
LIVE OAK
NEBB
SURFACE 1,000 - 100,000 100
SURFACE 1,000 - 100,000 100
IK-SIIU >100,000 ISO
IN-SITU >100,000 BOO
«»«««»« UTAH
MONARCH
ALLEN
COMETOITE
DEOE 6,7+8
DELTA MINE
DESERT MOON 3
DEXTER GROUP
DIRTY DEVIL 2
DOG 3
FLAT TOP LODE
INCLINE 1,2,4-7
INCLINE «
JACK RAB-ACE-N-H
JOSHUA 1
TEMPLE MOUNT*IK
THUNOEPRIRD
VANADIUM KI1G J
YELLOW DAISY
YELLOW OUEF.N
CONGRESS 29+40
CONGRESS-DAISY J
CONGRESS-EAGLE
DAISY JUNE GROUP
DELMONTE GROUP
DONALD DUCK 2
ELENORA 1
LUCKY STRIKE
MIDAS-CENTIPEDE
MINNIE PEARL
MOCKINGBIRD CLAI
P + F
POISON SPRING 3
SEC 36-31-11 SLM
TPACKYTE GROUP
BLACK JACK
BLACKSTONE 5*6
CACTUS RAT
COBALT
CORRAL 1 + 2
CORVUSITE
*«»»**********»»***
HOLLINGSHEAD MNG
WATTEPSON MINING
INDUSTRIAL MININ
ATLAS MINERALS
UTAH WEST INC.
WATTERSON MINING
JOHN ADAMS
INDUSTRIAL NUCL
JOHN ADAMS
MINERALS FVAL+IN
ATLAS MINERALS
ATLAS MINERALS
ATLAS MINERALS
TROJAN MINING CO
ROW CROSS
INDUSTRIAL MININ
TEMPLE ROCK MNG.
DAN L POWELL
AUGUST PRIEBE,JR
TED EKKER
ENERGY FUELS NUC
DONALD D HANNI
TED EKKER
DENNIS EKKER
DEE RAEY
ENERGY FUELS NUC
PLATEAU RESOU LT
SHUMNAY ASSOC.
LEO D JACKSON
J + R MNG
J + R MNG.
MUST,A + SONS
MINERALS RECVRY
ENERGY FUELS NUC
LYNN ZUFELT
ALFRED FROST
ATLAS-AMAX
L + D SHUHWAY
COTTER CORP.
SHIPROCK LTD
BEAVER
EMERY
EMERY
EMERY
EMERY
E*ERY
EMERY
EMERY
EMERY
EMERY
EMERY
EVERY
EMERY
EMERY
EMERY
EMERY
EMERY
EMERY
GARFIELD
GAPFIELD
GARFIELD
GAPFIELD
GARFIELD
GARFIELD
GARFIELO
GARFIELD
GARFIELD
GARFICLD
GARFIELD
GARFIELD
GAPFIELD
GARFIELD
GARFIELD
GRAND
GRAND
GRAND
GRAND
GRAND
GRAND
36
34
11
33
27
19
29 S 16,0 W
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
22 S 21.0 E
22 S 22.0 E
22 8 22.0 E
0
24 S 20.0 E
25 S 26,0 E
24 UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UfcDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNOERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERCRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
24 UNDERGRO
24 UNDERGRO
24 UNDERGRO
SURFACE
24 UNDERQRO
24 UNDERQRO
1,000 100,000
1,000 » 100,000
1,000 - 100,000
1,000 - 100,000
MOO, 000
1,000 - 100,000
1,000 - 100,000
1,000 - 100,000
1,000 - 100,000
1,000 - 100,000
>100,000
MOO, 000
1,000 - 100,000
<100
1,000 - 100,000
1,000 100,000
1,000 - 100,000
100 * 1,000
1,000 - 100,000
1,000 - 100,000
too - 1,000
1,000 - 100,000
1,000 - 100,000
1,000 - 100,000
100 - 1,000
<100
100 - 1,000
1,000 - 100,000
1,000 - 100,000
1,000 - 100,000
1,000 - 100,000
<100
1,000 ' 100,000
1,000 100,000
100 - 1,000
1,000 - 100,000
1,000 100,000
<100
MOO, 000
1,000 - 100,000
too
too
50
500
400
so
100
100
so
50
200
200
soo
0
0
50
100
200
50
too
100
50
50
50
50
100
0
150
50
100
0
50
50
100
50
150
so
10
150
150
en
-------
ACTIVE URANIUM MINES IN THE UNITED STATES
SOURCEl DOEi GRAND JUNCTION, COLORADO
PACE
MINE NAME
*****«*««» UTAH
LAST DOLLAR
MC GROUP
MINERAL POLAR 22
PINTO
POLAR GROUP
POLAR MESA
RED HEAD
SEC.32-CANE CRFE
BHINAPUMP 2
SLICK ROCK 1,2*3
UTAH ALLOY GROUP
BINGHAM
ABE 4
ATOMIC KING GROU
BEAVEP (DEER CK)
BIG BUCK 11A + 1
BLUE 1
BLUE BIRD
BUGS 1-4
CAMEL (HIDEOUT)
CANARY KINF
CLIFF HOUSE
COLUMBIA SHAFT G
COLUMRUS-RIM
COTTONWOOO 'GROUP
COTTONWOOn GROUP
DUSTY
EASTER
FAR WEST *INE
FRY 4
GENEVA
GLADE GROUP
HAPPY JACK (WHCA
HILLSIDE
HOLE IN THF POCK
HUMBUG
JEAN 1
JIMBO BOB
KING EDWARD
LAST CHANCE
LAURA GROUP
LEF. GROUP
LISBON MINE
LOCUST
LONG SHOT
HARKEY
HI VIDA
NORTH ALICE
CONTROLLER NAME
COUNTY
SEC. TOWNSHIP
RANGE MEPID,
(COMT'D) «..«...»
JOE GOMEZ
PIONEER UPAVAN
ATLAS-AKAX
ZIAK, P»UL
UNION CARBIDE CP
UNION CARBIDE CP
JERRY STOCKS
ATLAS-AKAX
GENERAL ELECTRIC
JIM C BUTT
SILLMAN, KENNETH
WYOMING MNPL CP
RICHARD V ENSLE
URANIUM PROD CO
UNION CARBIDE
BOB SHUMWAY
EAST STANDARD UR
DALE DILLON
MERrflN SHU1WAY
JI" C. BUTT
JEPPY STOCKS
GLEN J SHUMWAY
ATLAS MINERALS
ATLAS-«»AX
DAN SHUMWAY
MERWIN SHUMWAY
CLYDE R. SANCHEZ
GLEN J SHUMWAY
ATLAS MINERALS
JIM C. BUTT
CLAYTON STOCKS
ENERGY FUELS NUC
ATLAS MINERALS
ENERGY FUELS NUC
BLACK * SHUMWAY
ATLAS-A-AX
JIM C BUTT
SHUMWAY ASSOC.
EUGENE SHUMWAY
w. P., WILLIAMS
LAURA MNG. CO.
ENERGY FUFLS NUC
RIO ALGOM CORP
LTIGHTON-GRANT
DAN SHUMWAY
CALVIN BLACK EN
MINERALS WEST
JRJ MINING CO
GRAND
GRAND
GRAND
GRAND
GRAND
GRAND
GRAND
GRAND
GRAND
GRAND
SALT LAKE
SAN JUAN
SAN JUA1
SAN JUAN
SAN JUAN
SAN JUAN
SAN JUAN
SAN JUAN
SAN JUAN
SAN JUAN
SAN JUAN
SAN JUAN
SAN JUAN
SAV JUAN
SAN JUAN
SAN JUAN
SAN JUAN
SAN JUAN
SAN JUAN
SAN JUAN
SAN JUAN
SAN JUAN
SAN JUAN
SAN JUAN
SAN JUAS
SAN JUAN
SAN JUAN
SAN JUAM
SAM JUAN
SAN JUAN
SAN JUAN
SAN JUAN
SAN JUAN
SAN JUAN
SAN JUAN
SAN JUAN
SAN JUAV
26
33
JO
22
32
34
26
6
31
14
14
4
4
4
27
4
26
26
16
30
15
6
27
4
IS
11
21
24 S
22 S
25 S
25 S
24 S
26 S
24 S
23 S
23 S
28 S
30 S
33 S
37 S
37 S
37 S
29 S
37 S
36 S
29 S
37 S
35 S
40 S
31 S
31 S
32 S
29
1
17
30
29
0
0
25.0 C
20.0 F.
25.0 E
25.0 E
23.0 F.
21.0 C
20.0 E
20.0 E
22.0 E
0
0
0
25.0 E
24.0 E
21.0 E
21.0 F
21.0 C
0
0
21.0 E
24.0 E
0
0
21.0 E
25,0 E
0
24,0 E
16.0 E
0
0
15.0 E
0
22,0 E
25,0 [
21,0 E
25,0 E
0
o
0
0
24,0 E
2,5 E
0
15.0 E
24.0 E
24.0 E
24
24
J4
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
34
MINING
METHOD
UNDERCRO
UNDERORO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNKNOWN
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDCRGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDCRGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
TOTAL PRODUCTION
(TONS AS OF
100
1,000 -
1,000
1,000 -
100
1,000 -
l.ooo
100
1,000 -
1,000
1,000 »
1,000 »
1,000 -
MOO, 000
1,000 -
1,000 -
1,000 -
100
100
1,000 -
MOO, 000
MOO, 000
100
1,000
1,000 -
100
MOO, 000
1,000 -
1,000
1,000 -
MOO, 000
1,000
1,000 -
1,000 -
1,000 -
1,000
1,000 -
1,000 -
1,000
1,000 -
MOO, 000
100
100
MOO, 000
MOO, 000
MOO, 000
01/01/7
- 1,000
<100
100,000
<100
100,000
100,000
1,000
100,000
100,000
1,000
100,000
100,000
100,000
100,000
100,000
100,000
100,000
100,000
1,000
- 1,000
100,000
- 1,000
100,000
100,000
1,000
100,000
100,000
100,000
100,000
100,000
100,000
100,000
100,000
100,000
100,000
100,000
100,000
- 1,000
- 1,000
DEPTH
(FT.)
0
500
50
0
100
0
150
150
50
0
50
0
200
100
450
400
150
150
100
150
SO
50
500
400
100
50
0
0
550
150
100
100
200
200
50
100
50
250
100
50
200
SO
2600
100
0
1000
BO
400
m
05
-------
ACTIVE URANIUM MINES IN THE UNITED STATES
SOURCEl DOE, GRAND JUNCTION, COLORADO
PAGE
MINE NAME
****«***»* UTAH
NOTCH 1*4
OLD RATTLER
PANDORA
PATS PROPERTY
POSEY GROUP
PRETTY GIRL
RADIUM KING MINE
RAINBOW 41
RAINBOW LEDGE
RED + BLACK LIZA
RED ARROW
RED DEVIL
ROANOKE
SAGE
SALLY JO 1 + 2
SAN JUAN
SANDY GROUP
SCH SEC 2 CHINLE
SEC 2+31 REDD
SEC 28 CALLIHAM
8EC.2-28S-22F-
SMOKEY
SNOW FLAKE
SNOWBALL
STRAWBERRY
V-B AND GOLD BUT
VANADIUM QUEENl-
WATERFALL
WEE HOPE
WHITE CAN. t-C»M
WILSON LEASE
WOOD LEASE
WOODENSHOE 1+2
YANKEE GIPL
YELLOW CAKE
YELLOW CIRCLE GP
CONTROLLER NAME
COUNTY
SEC. TOWNSHIP
(CONT'D) **«*«»»
JUNCTION BIT+TOO SAN JUAN
ENERGY FUELS NUC SAN JUA1
ATLAS-UMAX SAN JUAN
M + H MINING CO SAN JUAN
ENERGY rUELS NUC SAN JUA1
DERYL SHUNWAY SAN JUAN
LEECO GAS + OIL SAN JUAN
DONALD V BLAKE SAN JUAN
JIM C 1UTT SAN JUAN
LOWELL E POCKWEL S»N JUAN
HNPLS WEST INC SAN JUAN
SUNRAY «INING CO SAN JUAN
CLAYTON STOCKS SAN JUAN
ATLAS MINERALS SAN JUAN
DERYL SHUMWAY SAN JUAN
HOWARD BALSLEY SAN JUAN
RICHARD KIPP SAN JUAN
SAN JUAN
UNION CARBIDE SAN JUAN
ATLAS MINERALS SAN JUAN
BIRCH + STOCKS SAN JUAN
BLAKE MKG CO SAN JUA"
LYLE DAVIS SAN JUAN
UNION CARBIDE CP SAN JUAN
DELAY SHUMWAY SAN JUAN
GLEN J SHUMWAY SAN JUAN
ROBERT YOUNG SAN JUAN
MURPHY MNG CO SAN JUAN
JIM C BUTT SAN JUAN
JIM C. BUTT SAN JUAN
UNION CARBIDE CO SAN JUAN
ATLAS MINERALS SAN JUAN
EAGLE PEAK HININ SAN JUAV
ENERGY FUTLS NUC SAN JUAN
REX POWELL SAN JUAN
LAMMERT + SHUMWA SAN JUAN
*******»»* WASHINGTON
«**»#»#**#«««*
MIDMTE-ROYD DAWN MNG CO
PETERS LSE-SHRWO WESTERN NUCLEAR
STEVENS
STEVENS
*» WYOMING
«*»««»**»*«*«*
r GRP SEC28 ARE PATHFINDER CARBON
JENKINS STUTE LE URAN.SUPPLY SPVC CARBON
21
6
15
4
2
02
28
36
35
29
6
25
15
6
12
34
6
3?
2«
11
29 S
37 S
27 S
31 S
37 S
29 S
30 S
29 S
27 S
29 S
IS S
28 S
31 8
36 S
32 S
31 S
36 S
27 S
21 N
28 N
28 N
27 N
RANGE
0
0
25.0 t
0
15.0 E
0
0
0
0
0
0
24.0 E.
25.0 E
0
21.0 E
23.0 E
0
24.0 E
24.0 E
0
0
0
23.0 E
24.0 E
24.0 E
0
26.0 t
25.0 E
0
16,0 E
26.0 E
25.0 E
0
0
24.0 E
23.0 E
38.0 E
37.0 E
78.0 w
71.0 W
MERID.
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
14
24
24
24
24
24
33
33
06
06
MINING
METHOD
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNKNOWN
UNDCRGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNOERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNKNOWN
UNDERGRO
.SURFACE
UNOERGRO
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
TOTAL PRODUCTION
(TONS AS OF 01/01/7
1,000 100,000
1,000 - 100,000
MOO, 000
1,000 " 100,000
1,000 - 100,000
100 - 1,000
1,000 - 100,000
too - 1,000
100 - 1,000
1,000 * 100,000
100 - 1,000
100 - 1,000
1,000 - 100,000
1,000 - 100,000
1,000 100,000
1,000 - 100,000
1,000 - 100,000
>100,000
MOO, 000
1,000 - 100,000
1,000 100,000
,000 - 100,000
,000 100,000
, 000 - 100, 000
,000 100,000
,000 * 100,000
,000 100,000
,000 - 100,000
,000 - 100,000
,000 100,000
MOO, 000
1,000 100,000
100 > 1,000
1,000 - 100,000
-------
ACTIVE URANIUM MINES IN THE UNITED STATES
SOURCEl DOE, GRAND JUNCTION, COLORADO
PAGE
MINE NAME
CONTROLLER NAME
COUNTY
SEC. TOWNSHIP
RANGE MERID.
MINING
METHOD
TOTAL PRODUCTION
(TONS AS OF 01/01/79)
DEPTH
(FT.)
*****«*«« WYOMING
(CONT'D) *****«*«**
SEC.33+4,28N-78W
BEAR CREEK 6-4,5
HIGHLAND PPOJ 0,
HIGHLAND PROJ.U.
SEC.33.37N-73W
SEC.36.36N-74W
BIG EAGLE
CAP 1,2+3
CLYDE, BPET, LOC
DICK CROUP
GOLDEN GOOSE
HAL-BART-EGL GRI
LUCKY MC GROUP
MC INTOSH E + W SN
OLA GROUP
PAY DIRT
RAVINE
SEC 16 MINE WATE
SEISMIC RES.SEC
SHEEP MOUNTAIN 1
SUNSET GROUP
XRIGARAY
PAY ALJOB-HEAP L
PAY ALJOB-PROTOR
STAR 1-7
SUSIE
ARE/CREC6WEETWAT
CRE
GETTY OIL
ROCKY MT ENERGY
EXXON CO USA
EXXON CO., USA
KERR-MCGEE CORP.
KERR-MCGEE CORP.
PATHFINDER MINES
FEDERAL AMERICAN
FEDERAL AMERICA
UNION CARBIDE CP
WESTERN NUCLEAR
PATHFINDER
PATHFINDER
WESTERN NUCLEAR
UNION CARBIDE CP
WESTERN NUCLEAR
WESTERN NUCLEAR
WESTERN NUCLEAR
WESTERN NUCLEAR
WESTERN NUCLEAR
FEDERAL AMERICA
WYOMING MINERALS
UNION CARBIDE
UNION CARBIDE
UNION CARBIDE CP
UNION CARBIDE CP
MINERALS EXPLTN
MINERALS EXPL.CO
CARBON
CONVERSE
CONVERSE
CONVERSE
CONVERSE
CONVERSE
FREMONT
FREMONT
FREMONT
FREMONT
FREMONT
FREMONT
FREMONT
FREMONT
FREMONT
FREMONT
FREMONT
FREMONT
FREMONT
FREMONT
FREMONT
JOHNSON
NATRONA
NATRONA
NATRONA
NATRONA
SWEETWATER
8WEETWATER
3
35
29
20
33
36
27
23
30
21
6
2
32
20
17
22
6
18
14
14
16
27 N
38 N
36 N
36 N
37 N
36 N
27
33 N
32 N
33 N
28 N
32 N
33 N
33 N
28 N
26 N
28
32 N
46
33 N
33 N
24 N
24 N
78.0 W
73.0 W
73.0 W
73.0 W
. 73.0 W
74.0 W
2.9
89.0 W
91.0 W
90.0 W
92.0 W
90.0 W
90.0 H
0
90,0 W
92.0 W
0
0
92.0 H
92.0
90.0 W
77.0
0
0
89.0 V
89.0 W
93.0 W
93.0 W
05
6
06
06
06
06
6
06
06
06
06
6
06
06
06
22
6
6
06
06
06
06
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
IN-SITU
IN-SITU
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
IN- SITU
HI-DUMPS
. LOWGRADE
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
SURFACE
>100,000
MOO, 000
MOO, 000
MOO, 000
1,000
1,000 *
MOO, 000
100
MOO, 000
MOO, 000
MOO, 000
MOO, 000
MOO, 000
MOO, 000
MOO, 000
MOO, 000
1,000 -
MOO, 000
MOO, 000
MOO, 000
1,000 -
MOO, 000
1,000
MOO, 000
1,000 -
'
100,000
100,000
- 1,000
100,000
<100
100,000
100,000
100,000
<100
<100
350
150
300
550
200
650
300
200
200
250
350
200
300
200
250
150
0
0
350
1550
200
250
0
0
50
ISO
200
100
m
I
'CO
-------
APPENDIX F
INACTIVE URANIUM MINES IN
THE UNITED STATES
-------
INACTIVE UPAKIUM MIKES iv THE UNITED STATES
SOURCEl DOC, GPA«D JUNCTION, COLORADO
PACE 1
MINE NA"E
CONTROLLER NAME
COUNTY
SEC, TOWNSHIP
RANGE MERID.
MINING
HCTHOO
TOTAL PHDDUCTION
(TONS AS Of 01/01/79)
DEPTH
(FT.)
..« ALASKA «*»»»««
CUB (ALASKA) STANDARD METALS
SOUTHEAST
UNDERGRO
1,000
100,000
300
APACHE. VINE
ARROWHEAD 1
BABTOK 3
BETTIE 1
BLACK 1
BLACK 2
BLACK MUSTACHE
PLACK ROC'
BLACK ROCK POINT
BLOCK K >-TKE RRO
BLUESTONF 1
CAPITA^ BEN6LLY
CARSON
CATO i
CATd 2
CHEK KEZ 1
CHESTK.H G°nUP
CHESTER "On 1
CHIMNEY MNE 1
CISCO 1 CA-"P SES
CLAIM 28
CLAIM Jt
CLAIM 7 « 10
CLEVELAND 1
COVE J
COVE 2
COVE 4
COVE MESA
COVE CESA 1
COVE "ESA 10
COVE VESA 2
COVE MESA VCA
COVE "1NES
DAN TAYL03 1
DENNY Lf.r 3
EAST MESA
EAST MESA 1 « 2
ETSITTY 1
EURIDA
TALL DO«N MESA
FLAG MESA 1
FRANK JR.
FRAI-K NO.!
NAVAJO TRIBE
NAVAJO TRIBE
NAVAJO TRIBE
NAVAJO TRIBE
NAVAJO TPTRE
NAVAJO TRIBE
MA/AJO TRIBE
NAVAJO TPIBE
I.AVAJP TPIhE
NAVAJO TRI^E
NAVAJO TRIPE
NAVAjn TPIRE
NAVBJO TRIBE
NAVAJO TRIBE
«AVAjn TRIBE
NAVAJO TPIBK
COOt.EY. CECIL J.
NAVAJO TRIBE
NAVAJO TRI&E
NAVAJO TPJRE
NAVAJG TPIRE
mvAjn Twrer
NAVAJO TPis^
NAVIJO THIPE
NAVAJO TRIPE
NAVAJO TRIF^
NAVAJO TRIPE
NAVAJO TPT9f,
NAV1JP TRIfr
SA1/AJO TRTPF
NAVAJO TRIt-F
^AVAJO TRTBF.
NAVAJO TRIBE
NAVAJO TPIPT
NAV1JO TPIPE
W*V»JO IRIhE
NAVAJO TPIBE
NAVAJO TPIBF
N1VAJO TRIBE
NAVkJP TBIhE
NAVAJO TRIBE
NAKJJO TPIBr
NAVAJO TPIBE
APACHE
APACHE
APACHE
APACHE
APACHE
AP6CHE
APPCHE
APACHE
APACHE
APACHE
APACHE
APSCHE
APACHE
APACHE
APACHE
APACHE
APACHE
APACHE
APACHE
APACHE
APACHE
APACHE
SPACHE
APACHE
APACHE
APACHE
APACHE
APACHE
APACHE
APACHE
APACHE
APACHE
APACHE
APACHE
APACHE
APACHE
APACHE
APACHE
APACHE
APACHE
APACHE
APACHE
APACHE
1
31
13
29
20
31
1
2
10
36 N
40 »
41 I"
36 K
15 M
46 i>
36 N
33 N
33 N
32 N
35 N
10 h
34 N
32 N
37 «i
33 N
9 N
36
36 N
0
0
0
0
0
29.0
0
0
29.0
29.0
0
0
0
0
29. n
0
25.0
18.0
0
29.0
23.0
23.0
23.0
0
0
0
0
0
29.0
0
0
8.0
0
23.0
2J.O
28.0
0
23.0
0
0
1.0
29.0
29.0
E
r
E
E
E
V
E
E
f
r.
r
t.
E
E
r
r
V
r
E
14
14
14
14
14
22
14
14
14
14
14
21
14
14
14
14
21
14
14
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
DNDERGPO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNUERGRO
UNOERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UMDEHGRO
UNOERGRO
UNDErlGRO
UNDERGRO
UNOERGRO
UNPERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
SURFACE
UNDEHGRO
UNDERGPO
UNDEPGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERCRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERCRO
UNDERGPO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
1,000 -
1,000 -
1,000 -
1 ,000
1,000 -
100
IOC
100
1,000 -
1,000 -
1,000 -
100
100
100
1,000 -
1 , 000 -
1,000 -
100
1,000 -
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
1,000 -
1,000 -
1,000 -
<100
<100
<100
<100
100,000
100,000
<100
<100
100,000
100,000
<100
<100
<100
100,000
<100
> 1,000
- 1,000
- 1 ,000
<100
100,000
100,000
<100
100,000
-------
INACTIVE URANIUM MINES IN THE UNITED STATES
SOURCEl DOE, GRAND JUNCTION, COLORADO
PAOC
MINE NAME
CONTROLLER NAME
COUNTY
SEC. TOWNSHIP
RANGE MERID.
MINING
METHOD
TOTAL PRODUCTION
(TONS AS Of 01/01/79)
DEPTH
(TT.)
C + G
HANLEY 1
HARVEY BEGAY 3
HARVEY BLACKWATE
HARVEY BLACKWATE
HAZEL
HOWARD NEZ 1
JAUMITA 3
JIM LEE 1
JIM LEE SMILF.Y
JI"MIE BILEEN 1
JIMMIE KING
JOHN KEE TRACT 4
JOHN LEE PENALLY
JOHN ₯. YAZZIE 1
JOHNNY MC COY 1
PCASE-IOOD BAhE 1
KNIFE EDGE
LAST CHANCE
LEASE 1
LOOKOUT POINT
MC KENZIC 3
MELVIN BEXALLY 1
MESA 1
MESA 1 1-2
CESA 1 1-4
MESA 1 3-4 MINE
MESA 1 MINE 14H
MESA 1 MINE 16
MESA 1 MIKE 22
MESA 1 MIKE 24
MESA 2
MESA 2 1-2 MINE
MESA 2 MINE 4
MESA 3 MIVF. i
MESA 4
MESA 4 1-2
MESA 4 1-4
MESA 4 MINE 19
KESA 5
MESA 6
MIKE BRODIE i
MILDRED i
MONUMENT 2
MONUMENT 3
MONUMENT HEAP LE
MONUMENT VALLEY
N S M 2
NA (CONT'D)
FOSTFR, GF.ORGE
NAVAJO TRIBE
NAVAJO TRIBE
NAVAjn TRIPE
NAVAJO TRIPS
NAVAJO TPIEF
NAVAJO TRIBF.
PAULSELL, PAT D
NAVAJO TRIBE
NAVAJO TRIBE
NAVAJO TRIPF
NAVAJO TRIER
NAVAJO TRIPE
NAVAJO TRIPF.
NAVAJO TRIBE
NAVAJO TRIBE
NAVAJO TRIBE
NAVAJO TRIBF
NAVAJO TRIBE
NAVAJO TRIBE
NAVAJO TRIBE
NAVAJO TRIBE
NAVMO TRIP.E
NAVAJO TRIBE
NAVAJO TRIBF
NAVAJO TRIBE
NAVAJO TRIBE
NAVAJO TRIBE
NAVAJO TPTBF
NAVAJO TRIBE
NAVAJO TRIBE
NAVAJO TRIBE
NAVAJO TRIBF
NAVAJO TRIPE
NAVAJO TPTBF.
NAVAJO TRIBE
SAVAJO TRIBE
NAVAJO TRIBE
NAVAJO TRIBE
NAVAJO TRIBE
NAVAJO TRIBE
NAVAJO TPIBF
NAVAJO TRIBE
NAVAJO TRIBE
NAVAJO TRIBE
NAVAJO TRIPE
NAVAJO TRIBE
HILL, ADAIR
APACHE
APACHE
APACHE
APACHE
APACHE
APACHE
APACHE
. APACHE
APACHE
APACHE
APACHE
APACHE
APACHE
APACHE
APACHfc
APACHE
APACHE
APACHE
APACHE
APACHE
APACHE
APACHE
APACHE
APACHE
APACHE
APACHE
APACHE
APACHE
APACHE
APACHE
APACHE
APACHE
APACHE
APACHE
APACHE
APACHE
APACHE
APACHE
APACHE
APACHE
APACHE
APACHE
APACHE
APACHE
APACHE
APACHE
APACHE
APACHE
18
14
3
36
29
12
22
22
22
28
21
21
20
IS
8
17
8
B
34
12
16
32
33
36
40
9
36
36
36
36
36
36
36
36
36
36
36
15
N
N
N
i
N
N
X
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
n
29
25
23
24
29
26
7
29
29
29
29
29
29
29
29
29
29
29
26
.0
0
0
0
0
0
0
,0
0
.0
0
0
0
0
0
0
,0
.0
.0
0
0
0
0
.0
.0
.0
.0
0
0
0
0
.0
.0
0
.0
.0
.0
.0
0
.0
.0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.0
E
E
E
E
E
E
It
E
E
F
E
E
F
F
F
E
E
E
E
14
14
14'
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNOERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNOCRGPO
UNDERGPO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGPO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDEHGKO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
HL-DUMPS
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRC
100
100
100
100
1,000 -
1,000 -
1,000 -
100
l.oou -
100
100
1,000 -
1,000 -
100
1,000 -
100
100
100
>ioo,ooo
1,000 -
100
1,000 -
1,000 -
1,000 -
100
1,000
1,000 -
MOO, 000
100
100
<100
-------
INACTIVE URANIUM MINES IK THE UNITED STATES
SOURCE I DOE, GRAND JUNCTION, COLORADO
PACE
MINE NAME
CONTROLLER NAME
COUNTY
SEC. TOWNSHIP
*****» ARIZONA
NAKAI CHFE 8EGAY
OAK SPGS GRAVEL
PETTIGREW PERMIT
PLOT 1+2-AFC PLO
PLOT 10
PLOT 12 SYRACUSE
PLOT 4CWILLIAM f
PLOT 6 RATTLESAN
PLOT12 RATTLESNA
POPE 1
P, F + R
RATTLESNAKE
RICHARD KING 1
ROCK HAT
ROCKY SPRING
ROUGH POCK SLOPE
RUBEN 1
SAM POINT
SANDY V.
SCHOOL BOY CLAIM
SHEEPSKIN MTSA
6HIPROCK
SHORTY 1 RATTLFS
SILENTMAN 1
SIMPSON 181
STEP MESA
THOMAS BEG»Y 1
TODAKONZIE 1
TODECHEENIE 1
TODICHINEL
TOHE THLANY BEGA
TOM JOE 7
TOM KLEE CLAIM
TOM MORGAN 1
TOM NAKAI CHCE 1
TOM NAKU CHTF.6
TOM KILSOK
TONECHLIE
TONY 1
TOPAHA
TREE MES»
TSOSIE 1
UPPER RED WASH
VCA RATTLESNAKE
KARHOOP GPQUP
WEST MESA
WEST RESERVATION
WILLY WATERS
CCO'JT'D) ««»»«»«»
NAVAJO TRIBE
NAVAJO TRIBE
NAVAJO TRIBE
NAVAJO TRIPE
NAVAJO TRIBE
NAVAJO TRIPE
NAVAJO TRIBE
NAVAJO TRIBE
NAVAJO TRIBE
NAVAJO TRIBE
NAVAJO TRIBE
NAVAJO TRIBE
NAVAJO TRIBE
NAVAJO TRIBE
NAVAJO TRIBE
NAVAJO TRIBE
NAVAJO TRIBE
NAVAJO TRIPE
NAVAJO TRIPE
NAVAJO TRIPE
NAVAJO TRI8F.
NAVIJO TRIP*
NAVAJO TRIBE
NAVAJO TRIPE
NAVAJO TRIPE
NAVAJO TRIBE
NAVAJO TRIBE
NAVfJO TRIBE
NAVAJO TRIHE
NAVAJO TRIBE
NAVAJO TRIBE
NAVAJO TRIPE
NAVAJO TRIBE
NAVAJO TRIBE
NAVAJO TRIBE
NAVAJO TRIBE
NAVAJO TRIBE
NAVAJO TRIBE
NAVAJO TRIBE
NAVAJO TRIBE
NAVAJO TRIBE
NAVAJO 1RIBE
NAVAJO TRIBE
NAVAJO TRIBE
APACHE MINING co
NAVAJO TRIBE
NAVAJO TRIBE
NAVAJO TRIRE
APACHE
APACHE
APACHE
APACHE
APACHE
APACHE
APACHE
APACHE
APACHE
APACHE
APACHE
APACHE
APACHE
APACHE
APACHE
APACWE
APACHE
APACHE
APACHE
APACHE
APACHE
APACHE
APAC»E
APACHE
APACHE
APACHE
APACHE
APACHE
APACHE
APACHE
APACHE
APACHE
APACHE
APACHE
APACHE
AP«CHE
APACHE
APACHE
APACHE
APACHE
APACHE
APACHE
APACHE
APACHE
APACHE
APACHE
APACHE
APACHE
12
32
12
31
30
30
36
35
12
36 N
39 N
40 N
39 N
39 N
12 N
39
34 N
36 N
34 N
34 N
36 N
30
36 N
13 N
RANGE
28.0 E
31.0 E
0
26.0 E
31.0 E
31.0 E
0
7.0 W
0
0
31 .0 E
0
0
0
0
23.0 t
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
29.0 W
23.0 E
0
23.0 E
0
0
20.0 E
0
0
. 0
0
0
0
0
29,0 I
0
0
0
0
29.0 E
0
0
0
MERID, MIKING
METHOD
14 UNDERGRO
14 UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
H UNDERGRO
14 UNDERGRO
14 UNOERGRO
UNDERGRO
21 UNbERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
14 UNDERGRO
UNDEPGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
SURFACE
14 UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDEHGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERCRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
22 UNDERGRO
14 SURFACE
UNDERCRO
14 SURFACE
UNOERGRO
UNDERGRO
14 UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDEPGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
SURFACE
14 UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
14 SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
TOTAL PRODUCTION
(TONS AS OF 01/01/79)
100 - 1,000
1,000 - 100,000
<100
1,000
1,000
100,000
100,000
100 - 1,000
<100
100,000
1,000
1,000
100
too - 1,000
1.000 100,000
100 - 1,000
<100
<100
<100
<100
<100
<100
<100
100 - 1,000
<100
100 1,000
1,000 - 100,000
<100
100 - 1,000
1,000 100,000
1,000
<100
1,000 - 100,000
1,000 - 100,000
DEPTH
en.)
ISO
too
0
300
50
300
100
so
150
50
100
150
100
350
300
50
100
0
0
50
100
200
150
100
300
350
0
250
50
350
100
150
0
0
100
100
0
150
200
0
100
100
200
0
50
too
100
100
CO
-------
INACTIVE UPANIUM MINES IN THE UNITED STATES
SOUPCEl DOE, GRAND JUNCTION, COLORADO
PAGE
MINE NAME
CONTROLLER NAME
COUNTY
SEC, TO'<"
-------
INACTIVE URANIUM MINES IN THE UNITED STATES
BOURCEl DOC, GRAND JUNCTION, COLORADO
PAGE
MINE NAME
CONTROLLED NAME
COUNTY
SEC. TOWNSHIP
******» ARIZONA
(CONT'D) *#«»#»*»#«#
HUSKON 6
HUSKON 7
HUSKON 8
J SEHALLIE
JACK DANIELS 1
JACK DANIELS 3
JACK DANIELS 4
JACK DANIELS 5
JACK HUSKON 3
JACKPOT 1
JACKPOT 40
JACKPOT 5
JEEPSTEF 1
JIMMY BOONE
JUAN HORSE 3
JUAN HORSE 4
JULIUS CHEE 2
JULIUS CHEE 3
JULIUS CHEE 4
JUNE
KACHINA 6
L.LITTLEM&N 1+7
L.LITTLF.MtN 2
L.LITTLEMAN 3
LISA GROUP
LUSTER 1
M JOHNSON 4
MANUEL DENETSONE
MAX HUSKON I 7
MAX JOHNSON 1
MAX JOHNSON 10
MAX JOHNSON 7
MAX JOHNSON 9
MONTEZUMA 1
MONTEZUKA 1
MONTEZUMA 7A
MONTEZUMA IB
MONTEZUMA 7C
MURPHY 1,7,10,16
NAVAJO 26
ORPHAN LODE (CCA
PAUL HUSKIE 20
PAUL HUSKIE 21
RAINBOW
RAMCO 20
RAMCO 21
RAMCO 22
RAMCO 24
NAVAJO TRIBE
NAVAJO TRIBE
NAVAJO TRIPE
NAVAJO TRIBE
NAVAJO TRIBE
NAVAJO TRIPE
NAVAJO TRIBE
NAVAJO TRIPE
NAVAJO TRIBE
NAVAJO TRIBE
NAVAJO TRIBE
NAVAJO TRIBE
NAVAJO TRIBE
NAVAJO TRIBE
NAVAJO TRIBE
NAVAJO TRIBE
NAVAJO TRIBE
NAVAJH TRIPE
NAVAJO TRIBE
NAVAJO TRIPE
KAVAJO TRIBE
NAVAjn TRIPE
NAVAJO TRIBE
NAVAJO TRIBE
BLACK, C.S.
LAUDEHDALr MNC +
NAVAJO TRIBE
NAVAJO TPIf»E
KAVAJO TRIBE
NHVAJO TRIBE
NAVAJO TPIBE
NAVAJO TRIBE
NAVAJO TRIPE
NAVAJO TRIBE
NAVAJO TPIBE
NAVAJO TRIPE
NAVAJO TRIBE
NAVAJO THIBE
GLASSCPCK,HO
-------
INACTIVE URAWIUM MINES IN THE UNITED STATES
SOUPCEl DOE, GRAND JUNCTION, COLORADO
PACE
MINE NAME
CONTROLLER NAME
COUNT*
SEC. TOWNSHIP
RANGE HERID.
MINING
METHOD
TOTAL PRODUCTION
(TONS AS Of 01/01/79)
DEPTH
CFT.)
»******»** ARIZONA
(CCNT'D) «»«.».»«
REDWING
RIDENOUR
RIVERVIEW
RYAN j
RYAN 2
S4,9,16,21CAMERO
SAM 7
SEC 1 EH SWO
SHARON LYNN
SUN VALLEY MINE
THOMAS 1
TOMMY
VERMILLIO'I
HARD TERRACE TRA
YAZZIE 1
YAZZTE 101
YAZZIE 102
YAZZIE 2
YAZZIE 312
YELLOW JEEP 1 A+
BEE CAVE
BIG BUCK GROUP
BLACK BRUSH
DONNA LEE
FIRST CHANCECGLO
HOPE CLAIM
HORSESHOE
JON
LITTLE JOE
LUCKY BOY
LUCKY STOP
BELINDA GROUP
RED BLUFF
FED CLIFF 1
SUCKEHITE
SUE
TOMATO JUICE
WORKMAN CLAIM
FLAT TIRE
B * M
HORSESHOE GROUP
MALAPAI
CHAPEL
CHERYL H 1
DEMO GROUP 24
HACKS CANYON
RADON 1
JkLMA-SEEGIN
MARBLE CANYON MG
HUALAPA1 TRIBE
UNKNOWN CONTROLR
NAVAJO TRIBE
NAVAJO TRIBE
WESTERn NUCLEAR
CONSUMERS AGENCY
NORDELL, A.C.
URANIUM MNG.CO.
GRAND CANYON URA
NAVAJO TRIBE
NAVAJO TRIPE
UNITED DEVEL.CO.
NAVAJO TRIBE
NAVAJO TRIPE
NAVAJO TRIBE
NAVAJO TRIBE
NAVAJO TRIBE
NAVAJO TRIPE
NAVAJQ TPIKE
BURKE, ROSS
METBEL KNG+ EXPI.
WESTERN MINING *
SMITH, H.C.
BAKfcR + CLINE
WYOMING MINERALS
HAUGHT, AlfFRED
WYOMING MINERALS
NICOLS + 'II,BANKS*
STACY * EPFINGER
WYOMING MINERALS
MORGAN*SHAW»WILB
WYOMING MINERALS
PATTERSON, ROY
TULSA MINERALS C
ARIZONA GLOBE UP
LE
-------
INACTIVE URANIUM MINES IN THE UNITED STATES
SOURCE! OOEi GRAND JUNCTION, COLORADO
PACE
MINE NAME
CONTROLLER NAME
COUNTY
SEC. TOWNSHIP
«***»*»***» ARIZONA
BIG CHIEF
BIG FOUR 2
BOOTJACK
CARNOT1TC CANYON
FERN
FIRELIGHT 6-NASC
GOOF £
GOTHE
HANSEN
J CITY 1
KAY GROUP
LITTLE JOHN 1,2*
MAC 3
MITCHELL 8UTTE
MITTEN 2
MONUMENT 1
MOONLIGHT
MORALE
NAVAJO
NEW «EX + ARIZ L
RAINBOW SMITH 1+
RESERVATION
ROCK GARDEI. 25
SAIN R20E T19N *
SALLY
SAM CHARLEE 1
SEC.33-18N-23E
SM 6S-TRACT II
SPENCER 1 MINE
STARLIGHT (EAST)
SUNLIGHT
SUNLIGHT SOUTH
SUNRISE
WINSLOW 6 + 1
BLACK DYKE
LIKDA LEE 1
DURANIUH 1
MONTANA GROUP
WHITE OAK
MOON BEAM
SEVEN STARS
UR-AIRCANDERSON
r H BARNEY
CCONT'D) **##«»*»»»
NAVAJO TRIBE
NAVAJO TRIBE
NAVAJO TRIBE
NAVAJO TRIBE
NAV6JO TPI«E
UAVAJO TRIBE
BERRY + HATFIELD
KAVAJO TRIBE
COSTON * BARTON
F.+ «.MINING
DAVIS + HATCH
YOUNG, MERRILL
MAC MAHON, JOHN
NAVAJO TRIBE
NAVAJO TRIPE
NAVAJO TRIPE
NAVJJO TRIBE
NAVAJO TRIBE
HALL, JOE
BAY SHORE FINING
RAIMO* URANIU1
NAVAJO TRIPE
BSY SHORE MINING
PO-CLL, L.*.
NAVAJO TRIBE
NAVAJO TRIBE
N.MEX»APIZ.LNO C
NAVAJO TRIBE
HAVHJO TRIBE
NAVAJO TRIBE
NAVAJO TRIPE
NAVAJO TRIPE
BONER + PETTIT
TWIN STATES URAN
HOLLER, J.
PUBEPSON*PAYTAIN
SANTA CPUZ URA.C
KILLEK, HUGO W,
CLARKE, W.H.
DAY * ADAMS
DUNNING, CHARLES
MINERALS EXPL CO
HOUSLEY, GLEN
NAVAJO
NAVAJO
NAVAJO
NAVAJO
NAVAJO
NAVAJO
NAVAJO
NAVAJO
NAVAJO
NAVAJO
NAVAJO
NAVAJO
NAVAJO
NAVAJO
NAVAJO
WAVAJO
NAVAJO
NAVAJO
NAVAJO
NAVAJO
NAVAJO
NAVAJO
NAVAJO
NAVAJO
NAVAJO
NAVAJO
NAVAJO
NAVSJO
NaVAJO
NAVAJO
NAVAJO
NAVAJO
NAVAJO
NAVAJO
PIMA
PIHA
SANTA CRUZ
SANTA CRUZ
SANTA CRUZ
YAVAPAI
YAVAPAI
YAVAPAI
UNKNOWN
23
33
34
36
1
33
2">
2
4
17
14
19
26
36
22
24
16
22
22
4
32
41 N
41 N
41 N
41 N
41 N
18 N
19 N
1 8 N
17 N
17 N
41 v
41 N
24 N
20 N
s
16 N
19 N
19 N
41 N
41 N
41 N
17 N
20 N
11 N
RANGE
19.0 E
19.0 E
19.0 E
o
19.0 E
19.0 E
0
0
19.0 E
19,0 F
23.0 r.
23.0 E
23.0 E
0
0
20.0 E
19.0 E
22.0 E
23.0 E
0 E
22.0 E
0
23.0 E
0
0
0
20.0 E
0
0
19,0 E
19.0 E
19.0 E
23.0 E
17.0 E
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
10.0 W
0
CRID.
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
MINING
METHOD
UNDERCRO
UNDERCRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNBERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACK
SURFACE
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
SURFACE
UNKNOWN
UNDERGRO
UNDERGKO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
TOTAL PRODUCTION
(TONS AS OF 01/01/79)
DEPTH
(FT.)
1,000 -
1,000 -
1,000 -
1,000 -
1,000 -
100
100
1,000
1,000 -
1,000 -
MOO, ooo
100
1,000 -
100
1,000 -
1,000 -
1,000 -
100
1,000 -
100,000
100,000
100,000
<100
100,000
100,000
<100
<100
- 1,000
<100
- 1,000
<100
<100
100,000
100,000
100,000
- 1,000
<100
<100
<100
<100
<100
<100
<100
<100
<100
100,000
- 1,000
100.000
100,000
100,000
<100
<100
<100
<100
- 1,000
<100
<100
-------
INACTIVE URANIUM HINES IN THE UNITED STATES
SOURCEl DOE, GRAND JUNCTION, COLORADO
PAGE
MINE NAME
CONTROLLEP NAME
COUNTY
SEC. TOWNSHIP
RANGE MERID.
MINING
METHOD
TOTAL PRODUCTION
(TONS AS OF 01/01/79)
DEPTH
(FT.)
»*«*«>*»**« CALIFORNIA
GYP
COSO CLAIM
BUCKEYE GROUP
KERGON 1
LITTLE SPARKLER
NOB HILL
OWEN 5
PIONEER 1
CORNELIA C 2
LOLA G
PATSY GROUP
EMERALD i
GROUP 102
LUCKY 3
MELODY GROUP
NORTHEAST GROUP
WHITE DOME
BIG HUNCH 1
MINDTE
ROSE OF SHARON
PINE COHE»SL STR
JUNIPER(S'IRA PS)
******* CGLOROAG
BLUP HORSE + NAN
FAIR DAY MINE
KIPP LEASE
HILL TAILINGS
KILLER LEASE
MOUNTAIN GOAT
SI5K
VICTORY GROUP
HIGHLANDER
LITTLE WARRIOR 1
MARTHA E.
SPANISH BAR GROU
BECK MOUNTAIN 10
KING MIDAS
WALTERS RANCH
ARROWHEAD GROUP
BARLO* CREEK
BROKEN THUMB 2
GOOD HOPE-NEVADA
RAINEY DAY
SOUTH PARLOK
ARROWHEAD 1
ROBBINS, HARRIET
FED.RES-PNI-UP
MIRACLE MINING c
GREAT LAKES OIL
KERN URANIU1 CO
CASTLE BUTTC URA
OWEN PINING CO.
GREAT SALT LAKE
BAKER + SONS
BAKER t MILLER
WAGNON, EARL «,
NEVADA GOLDFIELO
UNITED 'NG+DEVEL
HARDING J.L.
MINERAL EXPLOIT.
SAFPANEK,C.+J.
DAY + ADAMS
BIG HUNCH tRRN I
MINDTE, R.A.
0*I,LESSANDRO,B + G
DOG VALl-EY UPAN.
PATHFINDER
DUNCAN WALTER
BUSBY, P.I.
HTM STATES OIL +
KAHOKEY OZARK
MT* STATES OIL +
FRONTIER MINING
ENIBETA CORP
JIMTOWN URANIUM
UNCOMPAHGPE URAN
8EACOL CCJPP
MTN STATES UPAN.
SPANISH BAR URAN
WEST, GEORGE A
KLINE, BILL+ASSOC
MUNDY. LEWIS C,
ARROWHEAD MINING
FOOTE MINERALS
PETTIGREW.KARLEY
FW PINKERTOH
KILLIFORD, BEN J
FOOTS MINERALS
SKYLAND ENGR.CO.
IMPERIAL
INYO
KERN
KERN
KERN
Kf.PN
KERN
KERN
LASSEtf
LASSES
MADERA
MONO
RIVERSIDE
RIVERSIDE
RIVERSIDE
RlVRPSiriE
HIVERSIOP.
SAN BERNARDINO
SA'i BERNARDINO
SAN BER.VARDI'-'O
SIERRA
TUOLUMNE
BOULDER
BOULDER
BOULDER
POULDEP
BOULDER
BOULDER
BOULDER
BOULDER
CLEAR CREEK
CLEAR CREEK
CLEAR CREEK
CLEAR CREEK
CUSTER
CUSTER
CUSTER
DOLORES
DOLORES
DOLORES
DOLORES
DOLORES
DOLORES
EAGLE
25
n
20
n
2J
3J
26
7
33
13
7
19
29
e
15
23
15
20 S
27 S
27 S
27 S
32 S
31 S
27 S
23 N
6 S
6 S
6 S
6 S
2 N
44 N
2 N
40
0
37.0 E
32.0 E
32.0 E
32.0 E
36,0 E
22.0 E
35.0 E
0
24.0 E
0
20.0 r
0
21,0 E
21.0 E
0
0
2.0 E
0
0
20.0 I
19,0 W
72.0 W
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
10.0 w
0
0
0
0
0
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
25
25
25
25
20
22
06
22
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNOERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURF-ACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNOERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDEflGRU
SURFACE
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
SURFACE
UNDERCRQ
SURFACE
MISC.-PB
SURFACE
SURFACE
UNDERGRn
UNDF.RGRQ
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDFRGRO
SURFACE
<100
100 - 1,000
<100
<100
100 - 1,000
<100
<100
<100
100 - 1,000
<100
-------
INACTIVE URANIUM MINES IN THE UNITED STATES
SOURCEl DOC, GRAND JUNCTION, COLORADO
PACE
MINE NA.ME
CONTROLLER NAME
COUNTY
*»»«»» COLORADO
(CONI'D) «»»«
DORADO
LUCKY BEN LEASE
BILL * BUD 2+4
CAP ROCK 40
CLAIM 2
DICKSQN-SNOOPER
DILLEY RANCH
FIRST CHANCE(TAL
HIGH PARK
HONEST JOHN 1-J5
JOAN 2
KNOB HILL OPE BO
LAST CHANCE
LIGHTNING 2
LITTLE ABNER 1
MARY L. 1
MISERY MINE 7
MOOSE RAINROK
PICNIC TREE
RAINBOW ORE BODY
RED CLirr 30
SAND CREEK 4
SEC.3ft,17S-73W N
SEC.36,17S-73«' M
SPRING VALLEY
SUNSHINE GROUP
THORNE 9+10
ELK VAN TUNNELI.
END OF TRAIL 1
ENTERPRISE 1,2+3
GARTIELD MINE
HOMESTAKE
INCORPORATED 1
LOTTI B
MARNOLA LODE 1-1
RIFLE MINE
WARD GULCH
BONANZA
ROOT RANCH LEASE
TWO SISTERS
WOOD MINE
ALASKA HUMES
HUME
LUCKY JAC*
UNDECIDED 4
RIG RED 22
BETH 1-10
ANAL 1
UNKNOWN COVTRLR
YOUNG, CLAYBORNE
HARVEY, W.P..JR.
JOHNSON C.B.INC
8KN RIVER M.NG
JUNIPER 01L+MNG
BEATON, JOHN
HURD + ASSOC.
COTTER CORPORATN
STUPBAUM,STANLEY
6EACOL I>'C
HEISEN, EAPL
HEISEN, CHARLES
BF.NTQN + PRADY
MNRLS RECOVERY
SMALLER, F.J.
MC COPMACK.HOBT.
JUNIPER QIL+MNG
CYPRUS fMNES
JUMPER 011, + MHG
UNKNOWN CONTROLR
CURTIS + THOPPE
US BA.NK-GPNO JCT
US 6ANK-GPNO JCT
JONES + TAYLOR
OLIVER GIfM + wrD
ATLAS MINERALS
MASCON BROS* OLS
DOBPS F.C,
ENIEKPRISF MNG.
UNION CARBIDE CP
HAYES ERNST URAN
BENDETT1S +A530C
NEW CASTLE URAN.
JEPSON + HOLT
UNI01 CAPBIDE CP
LEHP., VERKON L,
RUTTER, ROBERT L
ROOT RANCH
UNITED MNG,*' L.
LYMAN, BOP
HU*rS, FRED
PIONEER EXPL.CO.
SCHEIFELE, H.J.
U S DEPT WILDLir
TURNER +HACKNEY
MULLINS+BEAUCHHP
SECURITY EXPL CO
EAGLE
EL PASO
FREMONT
FREMONT
FREMONT
FREMONT
FREC.OST
FREMO.VT
FREMONT
FRFMOVT
FREMONT
FREMONT
FREWQNT
FREMONT
FREMO"T
FREMONT
FRE«OVT
FREMONT
FREMONT
FREMONT
FREMONT
FREMONT
GARFIELD
GARFIELD
GARFIELD
GARFIELD
GAPFIELD
GARFIELD
CARFIELD
GAPFIELD
GARFIELD
GARFIELD
G1LPIN
GILP1N
GILPIN
GILP1N
GRAND
GRAND
GRAND
GRAND
GUNNISON
HINSOALE
HUERFANO
30
16
26
14
22
31
14
13
1
3ft
36
30
26
21
11
17
17 6
19 S
17 S
17
17
17 S
17 S
17 S
17 S
16 S
17 S
17 S
17
17
5 S
49 N
44
25 S
RANGE
0
0
0
72.0 W
71.0 w
73.0 W
0
0
0
0
73.0 W
73.0 w
72.0 w
0
73.0 W
73.0 w
0
0
73.0 W
0
0
71,0 w
73.0 H
73.0 w
0
72.0 W
73.0 w
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
B2.0 W
0
0
0
5.0 E
5.0
70.0 h
MCRID.
06
06
06
22
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
22
06
MINING
METHOD
SURFACE
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRD
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
UNDERGPO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
SURFACE
UNDFRGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
TOTAL PRODUCTION
(TONS AS OF 01/01/79)
100
1,000 -
100
100
100
1,000 -
1,000 -
1,000 -
100
1,000 -
1,000 -
100
1,000 -
100
1,000 -
1,000 -
1,000 -
1,000 -
1,000 -
100
1,000 -
MOD,000
100 -
100
100
<10G
- 1,000
<100
<100
<100
100,000
1,000
- 1,000
<100
- 1,000
100,000
100,000
100,000
- 1,000
100,000
100,000
<100
- 1,000
100,000
1,000
100,000
-------
INACTIVE URANIUM MINES IN THE UNITED STATES
SOURCEl DOE, GRIND JUNCTION, COLORADO
PACE 10
MINE NAME
CONTROLLER NAME
COUNTY
SEC. TOWNSHIP
RANGE HERIO.
MINING
METHOD
TOTAL PRODUCTION
(TONS AS or 01/01/79)
DEPTH
(FT.)
COLORADO
««»
STUMBLING STUD
ASCENSION MINF.
AUBREY LAD'IG LS
FORK PROSPECT
GRAPE VINE 1
LADWIG 2 PPOSPEC
LEYDFN MINK
MANN RANCH
MENA 1
OHMAN MINE
PALLAOPO LfASF.
OUATiAN LEASE
STONE PLACE" 7
WRIGHT LEASE
BLACKHAWK
LUCKY LEPRACON
SHORTY LODE
BLACK HAW< "INF,
BOULDER ROCK
EUREKA
RED KILL 1
WAHKETA LEASE
AJAX 1
ARROWHEAD 4
ARROWHEAD 4
ARROWHEAD 1 + 7
ARROWHEAD 10
ARROWHEAD 11
ARROWHEAD 13
ARROWHEAD 14
ARROWHEAD 17
ARROWHEAD 18
ARROWHEAD 19
ARROWHEAD 20
ARROWHEAD 25
ARROWHEAD 27
ARROWHEAD 28
ARROWHEAD 29
ARROWHEAD INC 1+
ARROWHEAD INC 12
ARROWHEAD INC 24
ARROWHEAD INC f>
AT-05-1-36
ATLAS-LONE MESA
AUSTIN + AUSTIN
BANCO 1
BELMONT 1 * 2
BESSIE GROUP
BRISCOE.G.E+ASSO
KERB KCGEE
RESERVE OIL+MINS
ROCKY MTN. ENERGY
E.E.LE«IS,I«C.
ENERGY FUELS NUC
MORENO URAN.CORP
j L MANN URAIIUM
UNKNOWN CONTROLR
OHMAN, LEIGH D.
EOUP CORNERS OIL
UNKNOWN CONTROL?
COTTER COPPORATN
BAfiNETT MINIMG C
SUBSET UNA*. INC.
STEARNS, l.G.
CHEROKEE MJNES C
MC LAUGHLIN, E.
NtW MAR UPANIU^
ROBIN'SOK, E.C.
NORTON, ELBERT
AJAX "INUG *OIL
ATLAS-AMAX
ATLAS-AKAX
ATLAS-AMAX
ATLAS-AMAX
ATLAS-AMAX
ATLAS-AKAX
ATLAS-AMAX
ATLAS-AMAX
ATLAS-AMAX
ATLAS-AMAX
ATLAS-A*AX
ATLAS-AMAX
ATLAS-AKAX
ATLA.S-AMAX
ATLAS-AHAX
ATLAS-AMAX
ATLAS-AMAX
ATLAS-AMAX
ATLAS-AHAX
UNION CARBIDE CP
DUNKLE, PALE
KOODARD, CHARLES
DAVIS, RALPH H.
CARPICO, A.M.
MC MANU8, JOHN U
HUERFANQ
JEFFERSON
JEFFERSON
JEFFERSON
JEFFERSON
JEFFERSQM
JEFFERSON
JEFFERSON
JEFFEPSON
JEFFERSON
JEFFEBSON
JEFFERSO'I
JEFFFRSQM
JEFFERSON
LA PLATA
LA PLATA
LA PLATA
LAPIUEP
LARIMER
LARIMER
LARI«ER
LARIMER
MESA
MESA
MfSA
MESA
MESA
MESA
MESA
MESA
MESA
MESA
MESA
MESA
MESA
MESA
MESA
MESA
MESA
MESA
MF.SA
MESA
MESA
MESA
MESA
MESA
MESA
MESA
24
29
19
12
26
5
19
2
2
10
11
10
10
11
2
2
2
2
3
10
10
10
2
3
11
4
6
17
)
16
3
4
3
5
2
36
51
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
SO
50
50
50
50
50
SO
50
50
50
50
SI
50
50
S
s
S
s
s
M
N
K
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
71.
79.
70.
70.
71.
11.
19.
IB.
19.
18.
1".
18.
18.
18.
18.
18.
18.
18.
18.
18.
18.
18.
18.
18.
18.
18.
18.
IB.
18.
18.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
V
w
w
V,
w
V
w
w
N
H
w
w
w
K
w
w
tl
06
06
06
06
06
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDEflGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGPO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
- UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDEHGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
100
1,000
1,000 -
1,000 -
1,000 -
100
1,000 -
1,000
ICO
1,000 -
1.000 -
100
100
100
1,000 -
1,000 -
100
1,000 -
1,000 -
100
1,000 -
100
1,000 -
100
100
1,000 -
100
1,000 -
1,000
1,000 -
1,000 -
1,000
1,000 -
100
1,000 -
- 1,000
100,000
100,000
<100
100,000
100,000
- 1,000
100,000
100,000
<100
- 1,000
<100
loo.ooo
100,000
<100
o
-------
INACTIVE URANIUM MINES IN THE UNITED STATES
SOURCEl DOE, GRAND JUNCTION, COLORADO
PACE 11
MINE NAME
CONTROLLER NAME
COUNTY
SEC. TOWNSHIP
*********** COLORADO
(CONT'D) *«»**»»»#**
BIG INDIAN LEASE
BIG MAVF.RICK
BIG SEVEN
BLACK MESA
BLACK POCK 2
BLACK STREAK
BLUE CRFCK
BLUE MESA VIEW
BLUE RI980N 1
BLUE RIBBON 3
BLUE PIPBON 17
BLUE RIBPON 32
BLUE RIBBON GKOJ
BLUEBIRD
BLUEBIRD DUMP
BONNIE
BUD 1
BUICK
C-G-27 (POK'.NIE 1
CALAMITY HOMESTF
CALAMITY VESA DU
CALCO
CAT TRACK
CAVE CANYON
CHICO + C FRACTI
CLIFF DWELLER
CLIMAX
CLIMAX RESIDUE
CLIMAX YD CLEANU
COAL TOWN.CITATI
COTTDNWOOO 3+5
COVE 1 ADIT
CRESCENT
CROWS NEST
CUB (GATE-JAY)
DALILU-YELLO«BIR
DEAL GROUP
DEPRESSION 2+3
DEPRESSION 4 + 5
DEPRESSION 6
DEPRESSION GROUP
DRUM DUST
DURANGO 2
ELIZABETH 7-10
EMERSON
FLAT TOP
FOUNTAIN OF YOUT
FRACTION
ARROWHEAD URAN.
KELLEY, D»N E.
ATLAS-AMAX
WILLIAMS, GROVEP
BENDER, E.E.
UNION CARBIDE
BLUE CREEK MNG,
BLUE CREEK MININ
ATLAS-AMAX
ATLAS-AMAX
ATLAS-AMAX
ATLAS-»MHX
ATLAS-AMAX
ATLAS-AMAX
ATLAS-CLIMAX
STEWART, HESLF.Y
V1»DE, HAY
SCHUMAC"EF, J. I ,
U.S.GOVT,
HENDRIC'N,>'.B + H
ATLAS MINERALS
HAMRICK+OPTMAYEP
SHIPROCK LTD.
AJAX MINING +OIL
GRAHAM F.R.
ZANETT, fPER
UNKNOWN CONTROLP
UNION CARBIDE CP
KEOGH»SHJM*AY
VAN UPl^Il"«
UNION CARBIDE
UNKNOWN
GRIPE + BAILEY
ATLAS-AMAX
NICKEPSPN ALBERT
BIIRNSIOE, GEORGE
DEAL MSG CO. INC.
AMERICAN KST MTL
NUCLEAR FUELS IN
CONTINENTAL MAIL
MATTERHORN MMC.
LAWTON BROS. DRUM-
BENHAM + TUNNEL
ATLAS-AMAX
ATLAS-AMAX
BURNETT, WILLIAM
MAVOUTH MINING
BEAVEP MESA
MESA
MESA
MESA
MESA
MESA
MESA
MESA
MESA
MESA-
MESA
MESA
f'ESA
MESA
MF.SA
MESA
MESA
MESA
MESA
MESA
MESA
MESA
MESA
NESA
MESA
MESA
MESA
MESA
MESA
MESA
MESA
MF.SA
MESA
MESA
MESA
"ESA
MESA
MESA
MESA
MESA
MESA
MESA
MESA
MfSA
MESA
MESA
MESA
MESA
MESA
19
20
32
27
31
19
30
3
10
17
16
3
19
19
31
13
35
10
23
9
36
22
6
22
4
25
11
5
4
4
ie
II!
17
18
34
4
19
n
31
12
50 N
50 N
50 N
50 N
50 N
50 N
50 N
50 N
50 I.
50 f.
50 N
50 N
50 N
50 N
51 N
SO N
50 N
SO N
50 N
50 N
51 N
50 N
SO N
50 N
50 N
50 N
50 N
50 N
25 S
49 N
SO N
50 N
50 N
50 N
51 N
49 N
50 N
50 N
51 N
50 N
RANGE
18.0 V
16. 0 M
17.0 W
0
19.0 W
17.0 fc
17.0 w
17.0 W
19.0 W
19.0 W
18.0 W
18.0 W
18.0 W
17.0 W
17.0 '»
0
0
18.0 W
18.0 w
18.0 V
1B.O t>
18.0 K
0
19.0 K
19.0 K
18.0 W
0
0
0
1S.O V.
18.0 W
19.0 <*
18,0 N
18.0 W
18.0 k
26.0 E
17.0 W
18,0 W
18.0 W
1S.O W
18.0 M
0
19.0 K
17.0 W
17.0 H
18.0 W
18.0 W
18,0 W
MEPID.
22
J2
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
24
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
MINING
METHOD
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNOESGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UMDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
DUMPS
SURFACE
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
DUMPS
UNDERGRO
UNKNOWN
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
K1SC.-PB
MISC.-PB
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDCRGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERORO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDCRGRO
MI5C.-PB
UNDERGRO
UNDERGflO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNOEHGRO
TOTAL PRODUCTION
(TONS AS OF 01/01/79)
DEPTH
cri.)
<100
<100
1,000 - 100,000
100 - 1,000
<100
1,000 100,000
<100
<100
100 - 1,000
1,000 - 100,000
<100
<100
1,000 - 100,000
100 - 1,000
100 - 1,000
<100
<100
1,000 - 100,000
1,000 - 100,000
<100
100 - 1,000
100 - 1,000
100 - 1,000
100 - 1,000
100 - 1,000
1,000 - 100,000
<100
1,000 - 100,000
1,000 - 100,000
<100
1,000 - 100,000
:
-------
INACTIVE URANIUM MINES IN THE UNITED STATES
SOURCEl DOE, GRAND JUNCTION, COLORADO
PACE 12
MINE NAME
CONTROLLER NAME
COUNT*
SEC. TOWNSHIP
RANGE MERID.
MINING
METHOD
TOTAL PRODUCTION
(TONS AS OF 01/01/79)
DEPTH
(ft.)
*«****** COLORADO
(CONT'D) »«
GATEWAY TAILINGS
GILHQRC LODE
GLADYS 1
HANSON-NEGUS
HARVEY 1
HARVEY-HICK+SHdV
HOLE 24
HOPE 1 TO 4
HUMDINGER
J,W. LEWIS
J.W.L.FRACTION
JEAN 1 + 2
JODY GROUP
JOE
JOHN BROWN
JOHN BROWN 14 +
JOHNNY MAE 3
JU DEE 1
JUMBO 1
KANARADO 3
KARN3 INCLINE
KING SOLOMON
KLONDIKE
LA PLAZA 1
LA SAL
LA SAL 1 4 2
LA SAL 3,4,6+25
LA SAL 9*7
LA SAL GROUP
LA SALLE GROUP
LEE 1-6
LEGAL * LUCKY DA
LEVADA
LIBERTY BELL 2
LINCOLN
LITTLE JOHNNY
LITTLE MAVERICK
LOCUS 1.2+1
LODE CLAIM
LOG CABIN
LONE PEAK
LOOK OUT
LOST DUTCHMAN
LUCKY BOY
LUCKY DAY
LUCKY HOLE
LUCKY PINE 2
LUCKY STRIKE
ALABASTER PRODUC MESA
GATEWAY MNG+OEV MESA
RIGGLE+HARTOUGH MESA
ATLAS-AHAX MESA
FOSTER + FOSTER MESA
BROriN, PAY MESA
UNKNOWN CONTSOLR MESA
ATLAS-FOOTE MESA
BRO»N, RAY MESA-
J.W. LEWIS MF.SA
UNIOS CARBIDE CP MESA
AMERICA" LEDUC II MESA
BOND, JACK MESA
E.E.LEWIS,INC. MESA
GATEWAY MNG+DEV MESA
UNION CARBIDE CP MESA
NE« IDR1A CNG+CH HESA
IP«IN, WAYNE A. MESA
ATLAS-AVAX MESA
BARREN, B.V. MESA
UNION CARBIDE CP MrSA
CANYON URA« co i MESA
BLUE CREEK MINIM M£SA
CAR^OTITE EXPL C MESA
CEN PAC MNG CO MESH
WOODARD, CHARLES MESA
ATLAS-A«AX MESA
SHIPMAH MNG+EXPL MESA
SHIPMAN ^KG+EXPL MESA-
FLANDERS KI-'INQ MESA
HA'RICK +LINSCOT MESA
NARDIKE, PAUL CESA
MONTGOMERY, JACK MESA
HALL, RIO B. MESA
SHIPROCK.LTO MESA
SHIPROCK LTD MESA
NARREN, B.V. MESA
MITCHELL, C.E. MESA
8UCAR MINES MESA
ZUFELT.LYNN MESA
STRODE, EFORY MESA
KEELINE OIL+URAN ME&A
PIONEER URAV INC MESA
UNION CARBIDE CP MESA
AJAX MINING +OIL MESA
CULLETT, ORA R. MESA
CORDREY+0,CONNOR MrSA
BUTLER, DEAN K. MESA
10
36
19
n
19
28
2")
5
36
31
1
36
19
33
12
24
25
22
36
36
36
36
21
7
23
31
31
21
28
33
35
27
19
26
28
32
51 K
51 N
51 N
50 N
51 N
51 N
50 N
50 N
51 N
51 N
50 N
51 *
50 N
SO N
50 N
48 N
50 N
50 N
51 ti
51 N
51 N
51 t.
SO N
50 N
50 N
51 N
51 N
50 N
SO N
46 N
51 N
50 N
51 N
50 N
24 S
SO N
19.0
20.0
18,0
n.o
18,0
18.0
. 0
17.0
18.0
0
20.0
0
0
18.0
20.0
0
20.0
0
17.0
18.0
20.0
18,0
18.0
19.0
0
20.0
0
20.0
20.0
2P.O
18.0
19.0
18.0
0
18.0
18.0
18.0
18.0
0
18.0
19.0
18.0
20.0
0
19.0
0
26.0
18.0
H
w
V
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
hi
W
K
V
W
W
N
W
W
W
w
u
w
w
w
H
W
H
W
W
W
N
E
W
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
24
22
MISC.-PB
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNbERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNKNOWN
UNDERGRO
UNDERCPO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNKNOWN
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
1,000 -
100
1,000 -
100
100
1,000 -
1,000 -
1,000
1,000 -
1,000 -
100
1,000 -
100
too
1,000 -
1,000 -
100
1,000 -
1,000 -
1,000
1,000 -
1,000 -
100
1,000 >
1,000 -
too
100,000
- 1,000
<100
100,000
<100
- 1,000
<100
- 1,000
<100
<100
100,000
<100
100,000
100.000
<100
100,000
100,000
<100
- 1,000
<100
100,000
- 1,000
<100
- 1,000
100,000
100,000
- 1,000
loo.ooo
100,000
100,000
<100
' <100
<100
<100
100,000
100,000
-------
INACTIVE URANIUM MINES IN THE UNITED STATES
SOURCE I DOE, GRAND JUNCTION, COLORADO
PAGE iJ
.MINE NAME
CONTROLLER NAME
COUNTY
SEC. TOWNSHIP
**»**** COLORADO
(CONT'D) *###»»
LUCKY STRIKE 7
LUMSOEK 2*6
MAMMOTH
MAMMOTH-LINCOLN
MARK 2
MARY 3
MAVERICK
MAVERICK C
MESA 5 (BEVR MSA
MESA 8
MESA CREEK
MILL CLF.AS UP
MILL SITE LODE
MINERAL CHANNEL
MINERAL CHANNEL
MINING LEASE 34
MLB-C-G-26
MLB-C-G-27A
MONROE 18
MONTEZUMA
NEILSON
NEILSON MOTHER D
NEWHEISEL
OUTLAW ECONOMY
PAY LODE
PAYDAY 1 THRU 1
PAYPOCK GROUP
PEACH 10 INC.1*2
PIT FACE 1
PPT.CONCENTRATE
PROTECTOR
PURPLE HEART
RADIUM 1
RAE MARIE 3
PAE MARIE CROUP
PAINBOW
RAINY DAY
RAJAH 1
RAJAH 11+ 63
PAJAH 72
PANCH VIEW
RAVEN 3
RENA
RONNIE 2
RUDOT 1
SALUTE 3
SAMPLE REJECT
SCOTT 2
BARONE » EDGEMAN MESA
UNION CARBIDE CP MESA
SEYMOUR + MYEP.S MESA
MAMOUTH MINING. MESA
UNION CARBIDE CP MFSA
UNION CARBIDE CP MESA
JONES + BOWLES MESA
ATLAS-AMAX MESA
RALPH FOSTER+5 MESA
FOSTER + SO*S MESA
CHRISTMAS,". MUG MESA
ATLAS MINERALS HESA
PALMER, JACK MESA
ATLAS-A^AX MESA
ATLAS-AMAX hESA
BOSMA + PIJBY t MESA
RAJAH VNTR-GC1VTL MESA
PIONR URAV GVTLS MESA
AMERICAN LEDUC II KESA-
NIEISOI.HAROLD t. MESA
DULASEY "INING f "ES»
OULANF.Y MINING C MKSA
rfOCOAPD. CHARLES MFSA
FOSTER < SONS MESA.
KELLEY, DAN E, MESA
BLACK CAT EXPL.C MESA.
DOYLE M K MESA
AMERICAN LEnuc u MESA
CHAPIM, LOUTS MESA
ALABASTER PRODUC MESA
SCHUMACHEP.J.l. MESA,
PETITTI, JOHN J. MESA
ATLAS-AMAX MESA
LCECO GAS * OIL MESA
k. S. DAwSON MESA
BRQ*N + WILLIAMS MESA
FOSTER * SONS MESA
UNION CARBIDE CP MESA
UNION CARBIDE MESA
UNION CARBIDE CP MESA
BLUE CREEK MININ MESA
UNION CARBIDE MESA
DEL RIO MSG CO, MESA
BARNETT, GRANT T MESA
BENHAM » TUNNEL MESA
AMERICAN LEDUC U MESA
SMITH, J, FARL MESA
HAYRICK *L1NSCOT MESA
32
36
31
31
1
27
3
3
12
1?
12
31
36
10
10
10
31
12
19
2
17
25
2
10
31
33
ie
35
36
35
36
30
32
19
12
34
25
27
SO N
SI N
SI N
51 N
SO N
24 S
50 N
50 N
50 (
SO N
50 N
44 N
50 N
50 N
SO N
SO N
51 N
50 N
51 H
50 N
SI N
SO N
46 N
SI N
51 N
50 N
24 S
50 N
45 N
51 N
51 N
51 N
50 N
SO N
51 N
SO N
51 N
50 N
50 N
RANGE
18.0 W
20,0 W
ie.o w
16, 0 W
20,0 K
25.0 E
la.o w
»8.0 X
0
18.0 K
0
0
0
is.o v
le.o w
m.o w
0
0
1».0 H
19,0 W
19,0 W
11.0 W
19.0 K
1D.O X
18.0 M
19,0 W
18,0 W
18.0 W
17.0 W
19.0 K
18.0 W
0
18.0 W
0
26.0 E
18.0 W
ie.o w
20.0 K
20,0 W
20.0 W
17.0 W
17.0 k
18.0 W
18,0 H
J9.0 H
18,0 H
0
ie.o w
HERID,
22
22
22
22
22
24
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
24
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
MINING
METHOD
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRQ
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
MISC. -PR
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNKNOWN
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERCRO
SURFACE
UNOKRGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
MISC.-PB
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNOERGRO
UNOERGRO
. UNOERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDtRGRO
UNDKRGRO
UNOERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
MISC.-PB
SURFACE
TOTAL PRODUCTION
(TONS AS OF 01/01/79)
DEPTH
(FT.)
<100
1(000 100,000
1,000 - 100,000
1,000 - 100,000
1,000 > 100,000
1,000 > 100,000
<100
<100
1,000 - 100,000
1,000 - 100,000
<100
1,000 - 100,000
<100
100 1,000
1,000
<100
<100
<100
1,000 - 100,000
1,000 - 100,000
100 - 1,000
<100
100 - 1,000
1,000 - 100,000
100 - 1,000
-------
INACTIVE URANIUM MINES IN THE UNITED STATES
SOURCEl DOC, GRAND JUNCTION, COLORADO
PAGE 14
MINE NAME
CONTROLLER NAME COUNTY
SEC. TOWNSHIP RANGE MERIO,
MINING
METHOD
TOTAL PRODUCTION
(TONS AS OF 01/01/79)
DEPTH
(FT.)
*****»** COLORADO
(CONT'D) »**»»*«»*
SHELBY DEAN 2
SILVER MOON
SMALL SPOT
SNOW SHOE
SOLDIER BOY
SPRING
STORMY TREASUhE
STRODE 1
SUM
8UN SPOT-CLOUD 1
SUPPLY 11
SUPPLY 14
SURPRISE
TENDERFOOT GROUP
THE DUKE
TODITLO
TROJAN 18 « 20
VANADIUM KIMG 1
VANADIUM KING 2
VIRGEN
WASP
WRAY MESA
YELLOW CAT
YELLOW JACKET 15
YELLOW JACKET 9
YELLO* JACKET I*
BESSIE 9+10
BLUE MOUNTAINS 4
BREADLINE
BUFFALO HEAD
BUTLER LEASE 1
CEDARS 1
CLAIM 1
CLCTA GROUP
DOC ARMOUR MINE
GERTRUDE
GLORY BEE
JOHNSON M.C.S.
LITTLE STAR
LUCKY BOY
ROB-ROLLO
SEC.16, 6*-94»
8UGARLQAF
THREE SISTERS
BLUE EAGLE 1
KARLE KAY
ROBERTA JEAN
SWALLOW 1
STULLER + BOKEN
BFCK, L,C.
ZIMMERMAN, BEN
FOSTER + SONS
PETPO NUCLEAR
ATLAS-AMAX
CHESAPEAKE* COLO
STRODE, EMORY
FOSTER + SONS
UNION CARBIDE CP
MONTGOMERY, JACK
AMERICAN LEDUC U
HUVOKIV MNG.CO.
GRAHAM, FPEO
UNION CARBIDE CP
ERDA
UNION CAPBIPE CP
WRIGHT,KARREN E.
URIGHT.fcAPPEN E,
CLEGHORN,DOUGLAS
CONTINENTAL MATL
UTIDA URAN.CO,
*RIGHT,KARPEM E.
ATLAS-AI-AX
ATLAS-»*AX
ATLAS-AMAX
UNIOS CARBIDE CP
SKULL CPEEK COAL
JONES, P.R.
BUFFALO HEAD HNG
CONOCO-PIONEER
HENDERSON,COUNTS
BASHAW 4 ULSH
BESSELL + KAYE
UNION CARBIDE CP
UNION CARBIDE CP
CLLER + CALDWELL
UNION CARBIDE CP
PO-ERS, LLOYD
RANGER UPAN.CO.
UNION CARPIDE CP
TONY WILLIAMS CO
MRS,G.I.TOWER
LEVKULICK, BILL
YOUNG, ELPEE
FOUR CORNERS OIL
HOTZ, EARL
SLIGAR, GENE
MESA
MESA
MESA
MFSA
MES*
MESA
MESA,
MESA
MESA
VESA"
MKSA
MESA
MESA
MESA
MESA
MESA
«ESA
MESA
HF.5A
MESA
MESA,
MESA
MESA
MESA
MESA.
MESA
MOFFAT
MOFFAT
MOFFAT
MOFFAT
MOFFAT
MOFFAT
MOFFAT
MOFFAT
MOFFAT
MOFFAT
MOFFAT
MOFFAT
MOFFAT
HOFFAT
MOFFAT
MOFFAT
HOFFAT
MOFFAT
MONTEZUMA
MONTF.ZUMA
MONTEZUMA
MONTEZUMA
34
10
9
13
11
12
35
12
32
35
35
19
32
23
19
19
18
30
21
3
3
3
30
8
9
33
16
51
1
50
50
41
50
50
50
51
50
50
51
51
50
51
51
50
47
24
50
50
50
e
7
7
5
6
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
S
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
S
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
19.0
3.0
18.0
18.0
20.0
18.0
18.0
0
18.0
19.0
1R.O
18. 0
0
18.0
19.0
0
18.0
18.0
18.0
0
18.0
19.0
26.0
18.0
18.0
18.0
0
0
0
0
91.0
0
.0
0
0
94.0
0
94.0
00.0
0
0
94,0
0
0
0
0
0
0
K
W
U
M
W
N
W
V
V
W
M
W
V
W
W
v>
W
W
t
k
W
W
V
W
W
W
U
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
24
22
22
22
06
06
06
06
06
SURFACE
MISC.-PB
UNDERGRO
UNDERGHO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
MISC.-PB
UNDEftGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDCRGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE,
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
UNDCRGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
1,000 -
1,000 -
100
1,000 -
100
1,000 -
100
100
100
100
1,000 -
100
1,000 -
100
too
1,000 -
100
>100,000
1,000 -
1,000 -
MOO, 000
too
100
too
100
<100
<100
100,000
100,000
- 1,000
100,000
<100
<100
- 1,000
100,000
<100
<100
1,000
<100
1,000
-------
INACTIVE URANIUM MINES IN THE UNITED STATES
SOURCEl DOE, GRAND JUNCTION, COLORADO
PACE IS
MIKE NAME
CONTROLLER NAME
COUNTS
SEC. TOWNSHIP
»«****«** COLORADO
(COPT'D) *»»»
VEACH
VIRGINIA ANN
1ST NATIONAL BAN
2ND NATIONAL BAN
30-30
45-90
ABAJO 1-5
ALL STARS EVTNIN
ALTA
ALTAIR.CAPELLA.V
AMERICAN EAGI.F *
AMERICA* EAGLE G
ANCHOR
ANGLE
ANNA MAY 1
ANNA MAY 1 DUMPS
ANNEX
ARCTURUS
ARRONHEADCURAVus
AUSTIN (DOLORES)
AZTEC
AZTEC
B P 1
BABE PUTK
BABY FAt-'N
BADGER
BADGER 1
BADGER 2
BADGER DU«P
BADGEP-CPDXN PRS
BAGGER
BALL POINT
BANNER
BEAVER
BED ROCK
BENCH
BERNARD
BERTIES BEAUTY C
BETTER B 7
BETTY JEAN
PIG BULL
BIG DICK
BIG MITT
BIG ROCK
BIG SHOT
BILL BADY-LUCKYR
BIRTHDAY 1
BISMARK
BRITTAIN + HALL
BUCKEYE MINING C
UNION CARBIDE CP
UNION CARBIDE CP
HADDEN. T.A.
UNIO>< CARBIDE CP
UNION CARBIDE CP
UNION CARBIDE CP
MONOGRAM MINING
UNION CARBIDE CP
V.EBB RESOURCES
MAYFIELP, JEPRY
UNION CARBIDE CP
GPA^LICH SAM V
UNION CARBIDE CP
UNION CARBIDE CP
NEESHAM, GLEN
UNIDM CARP-IDE CP
UNION CARBIDE CP
UNION CARBIDE CP
FOOTE MINERALS
UNION CARBIDE CP
DAVIS, PAY
FOOTS MINERALS
FOOTE MINERALS
UNIOV CARBIDE CP
UNION CAPBIDf CP
UNION CAPPIDE CP
UNIO'I CAPPIDE CP
«ICPO COPPER
UNION CAPUDE CO
MONTGOMERY, JACK
UNION CARBIDE CP
UNION CARPIDE CP
UNKNOWN CONTROLP
LYLE FRANCIS
UNION CARBIDE CP
KRESS + PISCHEL
MATTERHOHN MNG,
MONOGRAM MINING
FOOTE MINERALS
UNION CARBIDE CP
UNION CARBIDE CP
SIMPLOT, J.R. CO
HOSLANDER,GEORGE
UNION CARPIDE CP
GREEN, ARTHUR
UNION CARBIDE CP
MONTEZUMA
HONTEZUMA
MONTPOSE-
MONTROSE
MONTROSF:
"IONTROSF:
HPNTROSE
HONTROSE
MONTPOSE
MONTROSE
MONTPOSF
MQNTROSE
MONTROSE
MONTROSE
MQNTROSE
MONTROSE
MONTROSE
MONTROSE
HONTROSE
MONTROSE
MONTPOSE
MOMTROSE
MONTROSF
MONTROSE
MONTRQSr
MDNTR056
MONTROSE
MONTROSE
MONTROSE
HONTROSE
MONTROSE
MONTROSE
MONTPOSr.
MONTROSE
MONTROSE
MONTROSE
MONTROSE
VONTROSE
MONTPCSE
HONTROSE
HONTROSE
MONTROSE
MDNTROSE
HONTPOSE
MOHTR05E
21
23
10
19
28
23
13
3
10
3
1
18
18
7
18
28
20
33
20
14
6
19
10
26
19
2f>
20
11
12
32
20
8
31
22
12
19
21
3)
t
18
2
29
47 N
47 N
47 N
48 N
48 N
48 N
46 N
45 N
45 N
48 N
47 H
46 N
46 N
47 N
46 N
47 N
48 N
46 N
46 N
45 N
45 N
47 N
47 I*
48 N
47 N
48 N
47 N
46 N
46 N
48 N
47 N
46 N
48 N
48 N
45 N
48 N
48 N
46 N
47 N
46 N
46 N
47 N
RANGE
0
0
17.0 W
17.0 W
0
17.0 ft
17.0 K
17.0 W
18.0 W
1S.O W
19.0 M
19.0 W
18.0 W
20,0 w
17.0 W
17.0 w
17.0 W
17.0 w
17,0 W
17.0 K
19.0 W
17.0 V
0
18.0 W
17.0 W
17.0 K
17.0 K
18.0 V
17.0 K
18.0 V
17.0 *
18.0 W
18.0 H
17.0 W
0
0
17.0 W
16.0 N
17.0 N
18.0 V
18.0 W
17.0 ft
17.0 *
18.0 W
17.0 4
17.0 N
17.0 w
17.0 W
MERID.
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
HIKING
METHOD
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
'UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
DUMPS
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE -
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
DUMPS
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
TOTAL PRODUCTION
(TONS AS Or 01/01/79)
1,000 -
too
1,000 -
100
1,000 -
1,000 -
100
1,000
1,000 -
1,000 -
100
1,000 -
1,000 -
1,000 -
1,000 -
1,000 «
100
1,000 -
1,000 -
1,000 -
1,000 -
100
100
100
1,000 -
1,000 -
1,000
1,000
1,000 -
1,000 -
1,000 -
1,000 -
1,000 -
100
1,000 -
<100
<100
100,000
- 1,000
100,000
- 1,000
100,000
100,000
- '1,000
100,000
100,000
100,000
- 1,000
<100
100.000
100,000
<100
100,000
100,000
100,000
- 1,000
100,000
<100
100,000
100,000
100,000
- 1,000
- 1,000
- 1,000
100,000
100,000
<100
<100
100,000
-------
INACTIVE URANIUM MINES IK THE UNITED STATES
SOURCEl DOE, GRAND JUNCTION, COLORADO
PAGE
MINE NAME
CONTROLLER NAME
COUNT*
SEC. TOrfNSHIP
*»*«**»*** COLORADO
(CONT'D) «»
BITTER CREEK
BLACK DINAH
BLACK DINAH DUMP
BLACK EAGLE
BLACK GNAT
BLACK HAWK
BLACK JACK
BLACK PPI'iCE
BLACK ROCK
BLACK TOM
BLACKfOOT RATTLE
BLISS
BLONOA
BLONDY
BLUE PELL
BLUE BIRD
BLUE BIPD DUMP
BOB 6,7,8
BOB 9
BOB CAT
BOB CAT
BONANZA
BONITA 1
BOUNCIN BETTY
BROOKE 1
BROOMSTICK
BROWN DERBY
BRUSHY BASIN
BURBLES
BUCKEYE 4
BUCKHORN 1
BUCKSHOT
BUCKSKIN
BUCKSKIN GROUP
BUTTERFLY
BUTTERFLY
C F C
CABIN VIEW
CALVERT 2
CAMEL (LEIGHTON)
CANOPUS
CANYON 2
CANYON VIE*
CARPATHIA
CARPENTER PIDGE
CASHIN MILL
CEDAR RIDGE
CHECKER
UNION CARBIDE
UNION CARBIDE CP
UNION CARBIDE CP
COCKRUN, r.V.
HALEY FINING CO.
BRIGHT,GEORGIA T
MAGIC URANIU* co
BINDER, F. V.
UNION CARP.IDE
UNION CARBIDE CP
SANDRA MARIE MIN
UNION CARBIDE C
AYEhS, EVERETT
GRIPE W.r.
UNION CARBIDE CP
UNION OPMDE CP
UNION CARBIDE CP
UNIOrt CtRPIDE CP
BELL, A.L.t B.L.
UNION CARBIDE CP
GRAMLICH 8«M V
SECURITY UfcANIUM
BONITA UPAMUM C
JONES » THOMPSON
MAYFIFLP, JEPRY
FOOTE MINERALS
EARLEY, EMERY
SCHUMACHER J. I.
COCHRAN URANIUM
SMITH+JENSEN+DAV
CURTIS, CLYDE
UNION CARBIDE CP
JARMAN + HADDEN
F V BINDER
UNION CARBIDE
UNION CAKBIDE
UNION CARBIDE CP
CAMOOSE URANIUM
UNION CARBIDE CP
FOOTE MINERALS
UNION CARBIDE CP
PATTERSON, PAT
YACKEL, CAPL
UNION CARBIDE CP
UNKNOWN CONTROLP
HARRISON D.E.
AYEPS, EVERETT
PATTERSON* NEILS
MONTROSE
MONTROSE
MONTROSE
MONTROSE
MONTROSE
MONTFOSE
MONTROSE
MONTROSE
MONTROSE
MONTROSE
MONTROSE
MONTPOSE
MONTPOSE
MONTPOSE
MONTPOSE
MONTROSE
MONTROSE
MONTROSE
MONTROSE
MONTROSE
MONTPOSE
MONTPOSE
H'OKTPOSE
MONTROSE
MONTROSE
MONTROSE
MONTROSE
MONTROSE
MONTROSE
MONT"OSE
MONTROSE
MONTROSE
MONTROSE
MONTROSE
MONTPOSE
MONTP.OSF
MONTROSE
MONTROSE
MONTPOSE
MONTROSE
MONTPOSE
MONTPOSE
MONTROSE
MONTROSE
MONTRGSE
MONTROSE
12
28
28
4
27
2
3)
23
20
10
26
35
25
25
5
19
1
32
10
11
28
21
31
35
35
10
14
20
33
10
11
IB
4
18
22
4
30
46 N
47 N
47 M
45 N
49 N
15 N
46 N
48 K
46 N
47 N
48 N
47 »
48 N
48 N
45 N
47 N
47 N
49 N
45 N
45 N
28 S
48 N
48 N*
46 N
46 N
47 N
47 N
47 N
46 N
45 N
45 N
46 N
45 N
47 N
47 N
45 N
47 N
RANGE
17.0 w
17.0 H
17.0 W
16.0 H
0
18.0 W
18.0 w
19.0 V
18.0 W
17.0 W
17.0 w
0
0
18.0 W
17.0 W
18.0 W
18.0 W
0
17.0 V«
17.0 W
20.0 K
0
17.0 N
0
19.0 W
18.0 W
0
26.0 t.
0
0
18.0 W
17.0 W
18.0 W
18.0 W
17.0 W
20.0 V
17,0 W
18.0 W
18.0 K
18,0 W
17.0 t.
0
19.0 W
17.0 W
0
19.0 W
19.0 W
17.0 W
:RID.
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
24
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
MINING
METHOD
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
DUMPS
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
UNDERGHO
UNDERGRO
UNDEPGRO
UNDEHGRO
UNOERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDFRGRO
DUMPS
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
-UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
TOTAL PRODUCTION
CTONS AS OF 01/01/79)
DEPTH
(FT.)
1,000 -
1,000 -
100
100
too
1,000 -
1,000 -
1,000
1,000 -
100
100
1,000
1,000
1,000 -
100
1,000 -
100
1,000 -
100
1,000
100
1,000 -
100
1,000 -
100
100,000
100,000
- 1,000
<100
<100
<100
<100
- 1,000
- 1,000
100,000
100,000
100,000
<100
-------
INACTIVE URANIUM MINES IN IH! UNITED STATES
SOURCE) DOE, GRAND JUNCTION,'COLORADO
PAGE 17
MINE K
CONTROLLER NAME
COUNTY
SEC. TOWNSHIP
»»»»»* COLORADO
(CONT'D) ##»»»«*###
CHESTERFIELD TPE
CHILLI 5
CHIPMONK 1
CHRISTIE
CLIFDWELLEP DUMP
CLUB 1
CLUB GROUP
CLUB GROUP
COLUMBUS
CONFUSION
COPPEP JACK
CORPORATION
CORRECT
' COTTONWOOO 1,2*3
COUGAR
CRIPPLE CREEK
CRIPPLE CPEEK DU
CRIPPLE CPK 2 OU
CUE BALL
D + D 3
D + D 5
DADS
DAN PATCH
DAWN
DEER,JULY,SLIM
DIANA
DOAGY 2-LAST DOL
DOLORES 2
DOLORES HIKE >
DONALD L OUVP
DONNA K
DOROTHY
DOROTHY E.
DOUBLE JACK
DUCHESS 2 » 3
DUSTY DU«P
EAGLE ROCK 1
EDITH IREKE
EDNA MAE
EIGHT BALL
EIGHT 0 CLOCK
ELIZABETH ANN 1
EVENING STAR
EXPECTANT 1
FAERY QUEEN
FARMER BOY
FAULTLESS
FA»N SPRINGS 11
UNIOM CARBIDE CP
UNIOd CARBIDE CP
AYERS, EVERETT
STOCKS,R.M.+SISK
UNION CARPIDE CP
UNION CARBIDE CP
BLOSSER, RAYMOND
UNION CARBIDE
FOOTE MINERALS
SAM V, GPAMLICH
MARVEL MNG CO
UNION CARBIDE
I3H10K CARPIOE CP
PATTERSON, PAT
DOOLEY T.T.
UNION CARBIDE CP
UNION CAPBIOE CP
UNION CARPIDE CP
UNION CARBIDE CP
ROGERS + HUNT
DOfcELL H.L.
MICRO COPPTP CO
UNION CARBIDE CP
STORY, OREN
UNION CARBIDE CP
FOOTE MINERALS
UNION CARBIDE CP
BAIRD+SNYPER MNG
UNION CARBIDE CP
UNIOV CARBIDE- CP
FOOTE MINERALS
UNION OPBIDE CP
ST REGIS URANIUM
KYLE, JAMES A.
GRIPE K.E.
UNION CARBIDE CP
DOfcELL H.L,
STEWART, JAMES
JOHANNSEN E.J.
UNION CARBIDE CP
FINCH,TOM
HARDWICK +LOVESS
PETRO NUCLEAR
LONDON, ROBERT
UNION CARBIDE
KINSEY + KALICH
KAYFIELD+NICKERS
UNION CARBIDE CP
MONTROSE
KONTROSE
MONTPOSE
MONTROSE
MONTROSE
MONTROSE
MONTRaSE
MONTPOSE
MONTROSE
MONTROSE
MQMTROSE
MONTPOSE
MONTPOSE
MONTROSE
MONTROSE
MONTPOSE
MONTROSE
HONTROSE
MONTROSE
MONTPOSE
MONTROSE
MONTROSE
MONTPOSE
MONTROSE
MQNTROSE
WONTROSE
MONTROSE
MONTROSE
MONTROSE
MONTROSE
MONTROSE
MONTROSE
MONTPOSE
VONTPOSE
MONTPOSE
MONTROSE
MONTPOSE
MONTROSE
MONTROSE
MONTPOSE
MONTROSE
MONTROSE
MONTROSE
MONTPOSE
MONTROSE
MONTROSE
MONTROSE
MONTROSE
25
4
20
32
29
2
12
19
16
33
2S
21
21
3
14
35
2B
14
20
30
19
31
20
18
30
34
11
21
3
33
11
3
10
24
e
45 N
45 N
48 N
48 N
4B N
46 N
47 N
48 N
47 N
46 N
47 N
47 N
47 N
47 N
48 N
47 N
46 N
45 N
46 N
44 N
48 H
47 N
47 N
48 N
47 N
48 V
45 N
45 N
47 N
46 N
47 N
45 N
47 N
45 N
45 N
RANGE
0
16.0 W
19,0 W
0
0
17,0 W
17.0 W
17.0 W
17.0 W
20.0 W
1B.C W
17.0 W
0
19.0 ti
0
17.0 w
17.0 W
17.0 «
17.0 k
0
0
18.0 W
17.0 V
0
17.0 If
18.0 W
17,0 W
18,0 W
17.0 W
0
16,0 W
17.0 W
16,0 U
16.0 W
16.0 W
0
0
19.0 W
18.0 k
17.0 W
18.0 H
0
20.0 W
19,0 V
17,0 W
0
19.0 W
17.0 V
HERID,
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
MINING
METHOD.
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
DUMPS
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDEHGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
DUMPS
DUMPS
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDEPGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
DUMPS
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNOERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
DUMPS
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
TOTAL PRODUCTION
(TONS AS OF 01/01/79)
DEPTH
(FT.)
1,000 - 100,000
1,000 - 100,000
<100
<100
100 - 1,000
1,000 - 100,000
1,000 - 100,000
1,000 » 100,000
<100
100 - 1,000
100 - 1,000
100 - 1,000
<100
100 - 1,000
<100
1,000 - 100,000
1,000 - 100,000
1,000 - 100,000
<100
<100
<100
1,000 - 100,000
1,000 - 100,000
<100
MOO, 003
1,000 - 100,000
1,000 - 100, 000
1,000 - 100,000
1,000 - 100,000
too - 1,000
1,000 - 100,000
1,000 - 100,000
:
-------
INACTIVE URANIUM MINES IN THE UNITED STATES
SOURCEl DOE, GRAND JUNCTION, COLORADO
PAGE IB
MINE NAME
CONTROLLER NAME COUNT*
SEC. TOWNSHIP RANGE MERID.
MINING
METHOD
TOTAL PRODUCTION
(TONS AS OF 01/01/79)
DEPTH
(FT.)
»*»»«**«< COLORADO
CCONT'D) «**«»*****
FAWN SPRINGS 12
FAWN SPRINGS 13
FAUN SPRINGS 15
FAWN SPRINGS 1R
FAWN SPRINGS 21
FAWN SPRINGS 21
FAWN SPRINGS 3
FAWN SPRINGS 30
FAWN SPRINGS 4+1
FAWN SPRINGS 5 T
FIFTH NATIONAL B
FIREBIRD
FIPCCRACKEP
FLAT TOP
FLORENCE NELLIE
FOSSIL
FOURTH JULY + K
FOURTH NAIL BA\K
FOX
FOX CISTERN
FRACTION * FRAC
GILBERT
GNOME
GOLDEN EAGLE 14*
GOOD HOPE RED FO
GRAND DAD
GRANDVIE*
GRASS ROOTS
GRASS ROOTS DUMP
GRAY
GRAY DUMP
GRAY FOX
GREAT WESTER1"
GREAT WESTERN DU
GREENBACK
GROUNDHOG
GROUNDHOG
CYP LEASE
HAPPY
HAPPY JOE
HAPPY THOUGHT
HARD LUCK
HARDROCK
HAROLD
HENRY CLAY
HENRY CLAY DUMPS
HIDDEN BASIN
HIGH BALL 5
UNION CARBIDE CP
UNION CARBIDE CP
UNION CARBIDE CP
UNION CARBIDE CP
UNION CARBIDE CP
FOOTE MINERALS
UNION CARBIDE CP
UNION CARBIDE CP
UNION CARBIDE CP
UNION CARBIDE CP
UNION CARBIDE CP
UNION CARBIDE CP
UNION CARBIDE CP
SAN MIGUEL MINES
UNION CARBIDE CP
FOOTE MINERALS
UNION CARBIDE CP
UNIOtf CARPIOE CP
UNION CARPIDE CP
UNION CARBIDE CP
UNION CARBIDE CP
UNION CARPIDE CP
UNION CARBIDE CP
ALBANO, CLA1R
FAGFN + FAGEN
MAL PAIS MNG.
H.D.+JIM BUTT
UNION CARBIDE CP
UNION CARPIDE CP
UNION CARBIDE CP
UNION CARBIDE CP
BELL, PIRL W.
UNION CARBIDE CF
UNION CARBIDE CP
UNION CARBIDE CP
UNION CARBIDE CP
OLIVER + BUSS
FOOTE MINERALS
UNION CARBIDE CP
MIILEP+BLACKBURN
UNION CARBIDE CP
LONG, ARTHUR
FOOTE MINERALS
ONION CARBIDE CP
UNION CARBIDE CP
UNION CARBIDE CP
UNION CARBIDE
SHUHWAY+ DADE
MONTROSE
MONTROSE
MONTROSE
MONTROSE
MONTROSE
MONTROSir
MONTROSE
MONTPOSE
MONTROSE
MONTROSE
MONTROSE
MONTROSE
MONTROSE
MONTBOSE
MONTRDSE
MONTROSE
MONTROSE
MONTROSE
MONTROSE
MONTROSE
MONTROSE
MONTPOSE
MOMROSE
MONTROSE
MONTROSE
MONTROSE
MONTROSE
MONTROSE
MONTROSE
MONTROSE
MOMR05E
MONTROSE
MONTROSC
MONTPOSE
MONTPOSE
MONTROSE
MONTROSE
MONTROSE
MONTROSE
MONTROSE
MONTPOSE
MONTROSE
KONTROSE
MONTROSE
MONTROSE
MONTROSE
MONTROSE
MONTROSC
31
6
6
6
31
1
31
6
6
6
26
20
35
20
7
24
28
30
19
19
32
17
9
10
34
27
13
13
11.
20
20
18
17
9
10
21
2
IB
IB
32
29
29
20
26
46
45
45
45
46
45
46
45
45
45
47
47
47
47
45
48
47
48
48
48
46
47
45
47
48
48
46
46
47
47
47
46
47
48
45
47
45
46
46
46
4
47
47
46
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
S
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N .
n.o
17.0
17.0
17.0
17.0
17.0
17.0
17.0
17.0
17.0
17.0
17.0
17.0
0
17.0
17.0
18.0
17.0
17.0
17.0
17.0
17.0
17.0
19.0
n.o
0
0
17.0
17.0
16. 0
18.0
17.0
17.0
17.0
17.0
17.0
19.0
19.0
17.0
19.0
17.0
0
16.0
17,0
1.7
17.0
17.0
n.o
N
M
H
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
N
W
*
W
W
W
K
W
W
W
W
u1
W
V
V
V
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
V
W
W
W
M
W
W
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNOERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGPO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO '
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
DUMPS
SURFACE
DUMPS
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
DUMPS
UNDERGRO
-UNDERGRO
UNDCRGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
DUMPS
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
1,000 -
1,000 -
1,000
1,000
1,000
100
100
100
1,000 -
1,000 -
100
1,000 -
1,000 -
1,000 -
100
1,000 -
100
too
1,000 -
1,000
1,000
100
1,000 -
1,000 -
100
1,000 -.
too
1,000 -
100
1,000 -
1,000 -
100
1,000 -
1,000 -
1,000 -
100
100
1,000 -
1,000
1,000 -
100
100,000
100,000
100,000
100,000
100,000
- 1,000
- 1,000
1,000
100,000
100,000
- 1,000
100,000
100,000
<100
100,000
- 1,000
100,000
- 1,000
- 1,000
100,000
100,000
100,000
<100
1,000
<100
<100
100,000
100,000
- 1.000
100,000
<100
- 1,000
100,000
- 1,000
100,000
100,000
- 1,000
100,000
100,000
<100
100,000
<100
- 1,000
- 1,000
100,000
100,000
100,000
- 1,000
100
100
50
100
100
100
300
350
100
100
150
150
300
0
50
50
150
100
150
150
250
150
0
150
0
50
0
50
100
50
0
0
50
50
50
50
0
50
SO
0
50
0
150
150
50
250
250
100
I
I
00
-------
INACTIVE URANIUM MINES IH THE UNITED STATES
SOURCEl ODE, GRAND JUNCTION, COLORADO
PAGE 19
MINE NAME
CONTROLLER NAME
COUNTY
SEC. TOWNSHIP
****»*** COLORADO
(CONT'D) »*
HOMESTEAD
HONEYMOON
HONEYMOON DUMPS
HORSEHAIR I
HORSEHAIR GROUP
HOT ROCK
HOT SPOT
HOWLING COYOTE
HUMMER
HUMMER DU"PS
IOLA
IRENE
ISLAND VIEW 1-7
J.B. GROUP
J.J.
JACK RAHBIT
JACKPOT GROUP
JEEP
JITTERBUG
JO ANNE GROUP
JOE
JOE DANDY
JOE DANDY Dtl"PS
JOE RIVERSIDE
JOHN Z.
JOKER
JOKER
JOKER
JUDY ANN
JUMBO
JUNE RUG
JUNGLE BASIN
JUST RIGHT
KING
KING OF LODES
LARK 7 + 6
LAST CHANCE 1
LAST HOPE
LAST LOAD
LAZY THREE
LEVI
LITTLE BASIN
LITTLE BUCKHORN
LITTLE CHIEf
LITTLE DICK
LITTLE DICK DUMP
BALL, ALBERT
UNION CARBIDE CP
UNION CARBIDE CP
URRALRURU-HOLZ
GUIRE, HELEN M.
MEYER, KARL
PRICE « LEDLOW
DANVERS, DON
UNION CARBIDE CP
U«IO<. CAPPIDE CP
SCHUMACHER,J I
LA RUE, O.C.
UNION CARBIDE CP
UNION CARBIDE CP
CHAPMAN * FRANKS
UNION CARBIDE CP
UNION CAFPIDE CP
UNKNOk"( CONTSOLR
BEE HIVE MINING
PETERSON,FREDDIE
MARVEL XNG.CO.
CHERIGOS,HARRY P
UNION CARBIDE CP
UNION CARBIDE CP
UNION CARBIDE CP
UNION CARPIDE CP
SMART, O.E,
PLATEAU URANIUM
BLACK HA*K IJOAN.
ELDER, FRANK
ST REGIS URAMUM
BRINK, AL
AYERS, EVERETT
fOOTE -UNF.RALS
MENDI5CO, FELIX
E.E.LE'XIS.INC.
UNION CARBIDE CP
UNION CARBIDE
UNION CARPIDE CP
DYNATEK E^TRPRIS
SNJOEP, FRED JR.
D.» D.URAN +EXPI,
UNION CARBIDE CP
UNION CARBIDE CP
ATLA8-AHAX
HALEY, LEF
UNION CARBIDE CP
UNION CARBIDE CP
W.ONTROSE
MONTROSE
MONTROSE
MONTROSE
MONTROSE
MONTROSE
MONTROSE
MONTROSE
MONTROSE
"ONTPOSE
MONTROSE
MONTROSC
MONTROSE
MONTROSE
M.ONTROSF.
MQNTROSE
MONTROSE
HONTROSE
HONTROSE
MONTROSE
MONTRnSE
"ONTROSE
MONTPOSE
MONTPOSE
MONTROSE
MONTROSE
HONTSOSIC
MONT«OSE
MONTROSE
MOSTROSr
MONTROSE
HONTROSE
MONTROSE
MONTROSE
MONTROSE
HONTROSE
MONTROSE
MONTROSE
MONTPOSE
MONTROSE
MONTROSE
HONTROSE
MONTROSE
MONTTIOSE
MONTROSE
MONTROSE
20
20
1
2
12
33
21
21
29
11
3
26
11
2
18
21
25
2t
21
29
10
24
10
14
16
11
30
35
31
19
11
9
22
8
25
9
27
10
13
30
30
47 N
47 N
45 N
45 N
46 N
47
46
46
48
48 N
45 N
47 N
46 N
45 N
48 N
47 N
48 N
48 N
46 N
46 N
48 H
46 N
48 N
45 1
46 N
48 N
45 N
28 6
45 N
48 N
47 N
45 V
48 N
48 N
48 N
48
45 N
41 N
48 N
47 N
48 N
48 N
N
RANGE
0
17,0 W
17.0 K
18,0 W
18.0 w
17.0 »
0
19.0 W
17.0 w
17.0 W
0
18.0 W
0
17.0 w
19.0 w
17.0 W
17.0 *
18.0 *
20,0 W
17.0 w
18.0 W
18,0 W
0
17.0 K
17.0 W
17.0 V
18.0 W
18.0 W
19.0 W
18.0 t
18.0 W
19.0 W
26.0 E
17.0 W
17.0 W
0
17.0 W
18.0 W
19.0 w
18,0 W
19.0 h
18,0 W
18.0 h
17.0 K
19.0 W
18.0 W
n.o w
17.0 w
NERID.
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
2?
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
34
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
MINING
METHOD
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
DUMPS
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
DUMPS
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNOERGRD
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNOERGRO
UNDEAGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
SURFACE
UNOERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDEflGRO
UNDERCRO
UNDERGRO
UNOERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGHQ
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNOERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNOERGRO
UNDEHGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERCKO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
DUMPS
TOTAL PRODUCTION
(TONS AS OF 01/01/79)
DEPTH
(FT.)
<100
1,000 - 100,000
1,000 100,000
1,000 - 100,000
100 - 1,000
<100
-------
INACTIVE URANIUM MINES IN THE UNITED STATES
SOUPCEl DOC, GRAND JUNCTION, COLORADO
PAGE 20
MINE MAKE
CONTROLLER NAME
COUNTY
SEC. TOWNSHIP
RANGE MER1D.
MINING
METHOD
TOTAL PRODUCTION
(TONS AS OF 01/01/79)
DEPTH
(FT.)
***** COLORADO
(CONT'D) »*«*««»*»
LITTLE JE'CL
LITTLE JOE
LITTLE SLIP 1
LO HIGH
LOG CABIN
LOHI
LONE CEDAR
LONE PINE
LONG PARK 1
LONG PARK 10
LONG PARK 10 DUI*
LONG PARK 11
LONG PARK 12
LONG PARK 2
LONG PARK 3
LONG PARK 4
LONG PARK 5
LONG PARK 6
LONG PARK 6 DUM
LONG PARK 9
LONG PARK GROUP
LUCK DAY
LUCKY BLUNDER
LUCKY DOG
LUCKY MARX
LUCKY STRIKE
LUCKY STRIKE 4
LYNX
MAGGIE C
MAGGIE C D'J>
-------
INACTIVE URANIUM MINES IN THE UNITED STATES
SOURCE I DOC, GRAND JUNCTION, COLORADO
PACE 21
MINE NAME
CONTROLLER NAME
COUNTY
SEC. TOWNSHIP
«» COLORADO
(COM'D) *»*»»»
3
10
14
15
MINERAL PARK
MINING LEASE
MINING LEASE n
MINING LEASE u
MINING LEASE
MINING LEiSE
KINING LEASE 23
MINING LEASE 24
MINING LEASE 37
MINING LEASE 41
MLB-C-JO-7
MLB-C-SR-10
MLB-C-SR-15
MODEEN
MONOGRAM it
MONOGRAM 5-FRM G
"OONBEA".
MORN.STAR-MOONLI
MORNING GLORY 2
MOVIE STAR
MUCKER
MUM
MUSTARD
NAT CROUP
NATURITA 24
NATURITA 4
NAVAJO
NAVAJO
NEW CAMP BIRD
NIL 2 DUMP
NORTH STAR DU«iP
NORTH STAR UNAWE
KUCLA
NUCLA
OLD CROW
OLD GRASDAD
OLD QUAKER
OLD SALT LICK
OLD STAG 1
OPERA BOX
flPHIR BLUEBIRD
OPHIR DUMP
OREGON
OVERSIGHT
PABLO 4 + 5
PAIN-OBNOXIOUS
PARADOX 4,5+6
PARADOX BELLE
ATLAS-AMAX
LA SALLE MINING
UNION CARBIDE CP
BUNKER + CO
UNIOH CARBIDE CP
BR'ITO, BEN
ALBANO, CLAIR
BARKLEY * CO
SHATTUCK DENN MG
WORCESTER MINES
COTTER-GOVTLfTASK
TRIO I«D GVTLSE
COUGAH VENTURES
SCARS, RALPH
MONOGRAf' MIMING
MONOGRAM MKG c
UNIOM CARBIDE CP
E.E.LEiJS.INC.
TINTIC URANIUM
UMON CARBIDE CP
UNION CAPBIOE CP
PIONEER UPAV INC
UNION CAPCIDE CP
TRANS WOHI'D URAK
GRIPE fc.F.
GRIPE, ALLEN L,
TEMPLETOI.,CLIFF.
SCHUMACHER,J I
.MONTGOMERY, JACK
UNION CAPBIDE CP
UNION CARBIDE CP
UNION CARBIDE
UNION CARBIDE
UNION CARBIDE CP
CAMOOSE URANIUM
rOOTE MINERALS
UNION CAPBIDE CP
UNION CARBIDE CP
CNSLEYtOSTROWSKI
UNION CARBIDE CP
UNION CARBIDE CP
UNION CARBIDE CP
UN10* CARBIDE CP
UNION CARBIDE CP
CLEGHORN+WASHBRN
UNION CARBIDE CP
UNION CARBIDE CP
UNION CARBIDE CP
MONTROSE
MONTROSE
MOf.'TROSE
MONTROSE
MONTROSE
MONTROSE
"01ITROSE
MOMROSE
MOMROSE
MONTROSE
MOKTPOSE
MONTROSE
MONTROSE
MONTROSE
MONTROSE
MflNTRQSE
MONTHOSE
MONIPOSE
MONTPOSE
MO'ITROSE
MONTROSE
HONTRC1SF
MOKTROSE
MOKTROSE
MONTROSE
MONTROSE
MONTROSE
MONTROSE
MONTROSE
MO«TROSE
MONTROSE
HONTROSC
MONTROSC
MONTROSE
MONTROSE'
MONTROSE
MONTROSE
MONTROSE
MONTROSE
MONTROSE
MONTROSE
MONTROSE
MONTROSE
MONTROSE
MONTROSE
MONTROSE
MONTPOSE
27
5
5
31
22
21
2"
5
6
24
33
27
22
20
28
28
22
26
36
30
29
33
19
11
33
26
14
14
24
24
4
6
18
29
20
24
24
11
21
12
IS
30
47 N
47 N
47 N
48 N
47 N
47 N
47 N
47 N
47 N
48 N
46 N
48 N
48 N
47 N
46 N
47 N
48 N
47 N
47 N
46 N
47 M
47 N
45 N
45 N
46 N
46 N
48 N
48 N
48 N
48 N
45 N
45 N
45 N
48 N
46 N
48 N
48 N
48 N
46 N
46 N
46 N
47 N
RANGE
17.0 W.
17.0 W
17,0 W
17.0 W
17.0 W
17.0 K
17.0 W
17.0 w
17.0 W
18.0 w
0
0
0
19.0 K
18.0 W
18.0 W
17.0 K
19.0 w
19.0 W
17.0 W
17.0 fc
17.0 H
17.0 w
0
16.0 W
16.0 W
18.0 W
1B.O K
18.0 W
17.0 It-
lS.0 W
18.0 W
18.0 W
18.0 W
18,0 W
17.0 W
17.0 W
17.0 W
0
17.0 W
18.0 K
18.0 W
ie.o w
17.0 W
0
17.0 W
17.0 w
17.0 W
ERID,
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
24
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
MINING
METHOD
UNDERGRO
UNDCRGRO
ONDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
U&DERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERCRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNOERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDCKGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
DUMPS
DUMPS
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
JJNOERCRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERCRO
DUMPS
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
TOTAL PRODUCTION
(TONS AS OF 01/01/7
<100
MOO, 000
1,000 - 100,000
1,000 100,000
1,000 - 100,000
1,000 - 100,000
1,000 - 100,000
1,000 - 100,000
1,000 - 100,000
MOO, 000
100 - 1,000
1,000 100,000
1,000 - 100,000
1,000 100,000
1,000 - 100,000
1,000 - 100,000
1,000 - 100,000
1,000 - 100,000
<100
100 - 1,000
1,000 - 100,000
100 > 1,000
1,000 - ion,ooo
<100
<100
<100
<100
100 - 1,000
<100
100 - 1,000
100 - 1,000
1,000 ". 100,000
1,000 100,000
100 - 1,000
-------
INACTIVE URANIUM MINES IN THE UNITED STATES
SOURCE) DOE, GRAND JUNCTION, COLORADO
PACE 2J
MINE NAME
CONTROLLER NAME
COUNTY
SEC. TOWNSHIP
RANGE MEPID.
MINING
METHOD
TOTAL PRODUCTION
(TONS AS Of 01/01/79)
DEPTH
(Ft.)
COLORADO
(CONT'D) «««»***»
PARADOX C
PARADOX D
PARADOX VIE*
PATTERSON GROUP
PATTERSON SEEP
PATTY 4
PATTY S
PAYDAY
PAYDAY
PEG LEG 2
PINION-CEDAR GPO
PLUTO-SATDPN
POINT-EMPIPE
POOCH + POOCH i
POOP POY
PRAYER 6*9
PRINCESS PAT
PR08APLE
PROOUCTIOV
PRODUCTION DUMPS
PROHIBITION
QUARREL
ouo VAPIS
R.A.L. 1
R.A.M.
R.A.M. DUMP
RABBIT FOOT 2
RADAR-EARLY HOPN
RADIU" CYCLE
RADIUM HILL 10
RADIUM KILL 31
RADIUM HILL SO
RADIUM HILL 7
RADIUM KINGtURAV
RADIUM QUEEN 13
RAINBOW
PAJAH DUMP ORE
RAJAH-BIG CHIEF
RAMBLFR
RAMBLER DUMPS
P-ATEX
RATTLER 1
RATTLESNAKE 2
RATTLESNAKE-DAVI
RATTLESNAKETURNO
RAVEN
RED BEDS
RED BIRD 1 + 2
UNION CARBIDE CP
UNION CARBIDE CP
BELL, GEORGE L.
HOLMAN, CLAY
*RIGHT. PILL
MICPQ COPPER CO
MICPO COPPER CO
MONOGRAM MINING
BLUEBIRD MINING
UNION CARBIDE CP
UMKNCHN cnNTROLP
UNION CARBIDE CP
"ONOGPAM MINING
BLUE BIRD PINING
STRODE, EMORY
UNION OPBIDE CP
UNION CARBIDE CP
ROBINSON, CLAUDE
UNION CARBIDE CP
UNION CARBIDE CP
AYEPS + AYERS
MICRO COPPER
CO-ELL + ASSUC.
GREAT WESTERN UR
UNION CARBIDE CP
UNION CARBIDE CP
UNION CARBIDE CP
KRAUSK + MILLER
BEE HIVE MINING
UNION CARBIDE
FOOTE MINERALS
UNION CAPPIDE
FOOTE MINERALS
UNION CARBIDE CP
MAPVEL t-HC CU
TOHPES, DAVID
COL COL DRILLING
FOOTE MINERALS
UNION CARBIDE CP
UNION CARBIDE CP
HIDDEN SPLENDOR
BRUCE, FERRIS
CRANDELL, MARION
B + L MNG.
YEADON * KEMPF
UNION CARBIDE CP
RADIUM HILL URAM
OLIVER 4- BUSS
MOMTROSE
MONTROSE
MONTROSE
MONTROSC
MONTROSE
MONTPOSE
MONTROSE
HONTRQSE
MOMTROSE
MONTPost:
MONTROSE
MONTPOSF
MONTROSC
MONTPOSE
MONTPOSE
MONTROSE
MONTRQSE
MONTROSE
MONTROSE
MONTPOSE
MONTROSE
MONTROSE
«0*TROSE
MONTROSE
MONTROSE
MONTROSE
MONTPOSE
MONTPOSE
MONTROSE
MONTPOSE
MPNTROSf
MONTROSC
MONTPOSE
MOKTROSE
WONTHOSE
MONTROSE
MONTROSE
MONTROSE
MONTPOSE
MONTROSE
tiONTROSE
MONTROSE
MOMROSE
MONTROSE
MONTP05F.
MONTROSE
MONTPOSE
MONTROSE
22
21
2
IS
18
34
3
23
34
19
24
12
23
9
3
14
4
20
8
12
3
23
33
33
2
24
8
10
10
16
1
20
27
7
6
33
33
7
33
2
)
JO
23
9
46
46
46
48
48
46
45
48
45
47
18
46
48
45
48
47
45
47
48
45
48
48
48
48
45
45
48
45
45
45
46
48
47
46
48
48
48
47
45
47
47
48
48
48
N
N
N
N
N
V
tt
N
N
-H
N
N
N
N
N
N
'N
N
N
S
w
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
1
>l
H
N
N
V
N
N
N
N
17,0 W
n.o N
17,0 W
1 R , 0 K
lfl.0 W
18,0 W
1B,0> W
lf.0 W
18,0 W
17,0 V
19,0 k.
18,0 W
18.0 W
19.0 h
18,0 W
2ft. 0 W
0
19.0 W
17,0 V,
0
18.0 w
18.0 W
18.0 W
18,0 t>
n.o w
17,0 W
1P.O W
19.0 W
19.0 V.
1B.O K
18.0 W
0
18.0 W
17,0 W
18.0 V«
19.0 K
19.0 W
19.0 H
17.0 w
17.0 w
17.0 W
0
18.0 W
20.0 W
17.0 W
17.0 W
19.0 W
19,0 W
22
22
22
22
2?
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
UNDERGRO
UNDERCP.O
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UIDEHGRO
UNOERGRt)
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNOCRGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
DUMPS
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
DUMPS '
UNDERGRO
6URF»CE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGHO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDEHGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERCRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
DUMPS
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
1,000 -
>100,000
100
100
1,000 -
1,000 -
100
1,000 -
1,000 -
1,000 -
1,000 -
100
100
1,000 -
MOO, 000
1,000 »
1,000 -
1,000 -
1,000 -
100
1,000 -
.
1,000 -
1,000 *
100
1,000 "
1,000 -
1,000 -
1,000 -
1,000 -
100,000
- 1,000
<100
<100
- 1, 000
100,000
100,000
<100
- 1,000
-------
INACTIVE URANIUM MINES IN THE UNITED STATES
SOlTPCEl DOE, GRAND JUNCTION, COLORADO
PAGE 21
MINE NAME
CONTROLLER NAME
COUNT*
SEC. TOWNSHIP
**»**»***« COLORADO
(CONT'D) ««»»»»
RED BIRD 30
RED COrf
RED HEAD 1
RED ROCK 1
RED ROCK 5
RED SOX-YANKEES
REOBIRD-YELLO»BI
REMANENT 1
RENEGADE GROUP
REPUBLICAN DUMP
REPUBLICAN.DUSTY
RES.BLOCK 1 ML.4
RIGEL
RIM CLAIMS
RIMRK.BLUES 15*1
RIMROCK
PIMPOCK BLUES 2«
PIMPOCK BLUES 5
RIMROCK BLUES 6+
RIMROCK BLUES 6E
RIMROCK BLUES 9
ROCK RAVEN
RODDY I
ROSEBUD
ROYAL OAK
RUBADALE
RUSTY 5
BAH
SANDY
SAUCER BASI-. GPO
SCHOOL MARM
BEC.20, 46.1'"t7E N
8EGO LlbY 1
SHAOOfc
SHADO'" ROCK
SHAMROCK
SHAMROCK
SHARKEY
SHOOTING STAR
SKRIVER
SLIW= CHANCE
SMOKY
SOCKET
SOONER OR LATER
SPHINX
SPHINX DUMP
ST PATRICK
STAR 13 * I*
MCGFHEE, L.
UNION CARBIDE CP
DOYLE U.K.
MICRO COPPER
MICRO COPPER
UNION CARBIDE
CLAXTON.W.O.+ASQ
SOUTHWESTERN OIL
CLEGHORN+WASHBRN
UNION CARBIDE CP
UNIOn CARBIDE
GARDNER t BROWN
UNION CARBIDE CP
GRIPE W.E,
UNION CARBIDE CP
MICRO COPPER CO
UNION CARBIDE CP
UNION CARBIDE CP
UNION CARBIDE CP
UNION CARBIDE CP
UNION CARBIDE CP
U«ION CARBIDE CP
ALBERT BELL
FOOTS MINERALS
UNION CARBIDE CP
A"AFiILLO "NG
BEERS. SIDNEY J.
UNION CARBIDE CP
UNION.CARBIDE CP
NEESHAM, GLEN
FOOTE CISERALS
ATOMIC ENERGY CO
DANVERS, DON
MONTGOMERY, N.W,
BLEAK, CHARLES
UKICN CARBIDE CP
TOOTS MINERALS
UNION CARBIDE CP
DOWECL+ MC ILVIR
UNION CARBIDE CP
SCHARF, T.J
CLYDE URAN.CORP.
MONTGOMERY, N.K.
NICHOLS, CARL L.
UNION CARBIDE CP
UNION CARBIDE CP
UlUCIN CARBIDE CP
UNION CARBIDE C
MONTROSE
MONTROSE
MONTROSE
MONTROSE
MONTPOSE
MONTROSE
MONTROSg
MONTROSE
MONTROSVJ
MONTROSE
MONTROSE
MONTROSE
MONTROSE
MONTROSE
MONTPOSL
MONTROSE
MONTROSE
MONTPOSE
HONTROSE
MONTPOSE
MONTROSE
MONTROSE
MONTROSE
MONTROSE
MONTROSE
MONTROSE
MONTPOSE
MONTROSE
MONTROSE
MPNTROSC
MONTROSE
MONTROSE
MONTROSE
MONTROSE
yriNTROSE
MONTROSE
MONTROSE
HONTROSE
MONTROSE
MONTROSE
MONTROSE
MONTPOSE
MONTROSE
MONTROSE
MONTROSE
MONTROSE
MONTROSET
MONTROSE
5
2
28
28
23
33
7
12
20
33
13
23
36
15
9
1
1
1
35
13
10
28
f>
36
20
t
2
20
32
20
I
29
3S
20
25
20
20
20
IB
40
48 N
48 N
48 N
46 N
48 N
48 N
47 »
48 N
46 N
48 V
46 N
48 N
45 N
45 N
45 N
45 N
48 N
48 N
45 N
47 N
47 N
46 N
48 N
47 N
45 N
46 N
47 N
48 N
48 N
48 N
46 H
N
N
47
48
47 N
48 N
47 N
47 N
47 N
RANGE
19,0 W
18.0 W
0
18.0 W
18.0 w
16.0 V
19.0 K
18.0 W
18,0 W
0
17.0 w
17.0 K
18.0 K
18.0 W
18.0 W
18.0 N
0
18.0 W
18.0 w
18.0 W
18.0 W
17,0 w
0
18.0 W
18.0 W
17.0 W
17.0 V
18.0 M
17.0 w
17.0 W
18.0 W
17.0 w
19.0 w
18.0 W
19.0 W
17.0 W
18. 0 V
17.0 N
18.0 W
0
0
17.0.W
19.0 W
0
17.0 W
J7.0 W
17.0 W
0
KERID.
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
72
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
MINING
METHOD
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNOERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
DUMPS
UNDERGRO
ITNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGPO
UNDERCRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDCRGRa
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDtRGRQ.
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGROT
SURFACE
SURFACE
UNDERGRO'
UNDERGRO
DUMPS
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
TOTAL PRODUCTION
(TONS AS OF 01/01/79)
1,000 -
too
too
1,000 -
1,000 *
1,000 -
1,000 -
1,000 -
1,000 -
1,000 '
1,000
100
too
1,000 -
1,000 -
1,000
1,000 -
1,000 -
100
1,000 -
1,000 -
1,000 '.
100
100
1,000 -
1,000 «
100
too
1,000 -
100
1,000 -
1,000 -
100,000
<100
<100
- 1,000
' 1,000
100,000
100,000
<100
100,000
100,000
100,000
100,000
100,000
<100
100,000
> 1,000
- 1,000
100,000
100,000
100,000
100,000
100,000
<100
<100
<100
* 1,000
<100
100,000
100,000
100,000
- 1,000
<100
<100
<100
- 1,000
100,000
<100
100,000
-------
INACTIVE URANIUM MINES IN THE UNITED STATES
SOURCE! DOE, GRAND JUNCTION, COLORADO
PACE 24
MINE NAME
CONTROLLER NAME
COUNT*
SEC. TOWNSHIP
RANGE HER ID.
MINING
METHOD
TOTAL PRODUCTION
(TONS AS Of 01/01/79)
DEPTH
1,000 -
1,000 -
1,000 -
1,000 -
1,000
1,000 -
1,000 -
100
1,000 -
100
1,000 '
100
1,000 -
1,000 -
1,000 -
100
1,000 *
100,000
<100
100,000
100,000
- 1,000
<100
<100
- 1,000
100, 000
<100
<100
100,000
<100
100,000
- 1,000
<100
<100
<100
100,000
100,000
<100
100,000
<100
100,000
- 1,000
100,000
100,000
<100
100,000
100,000
100,000
100,000
100,000
100,000
100,000
- 1,000
100,000
- 1,000
<100
<100
100,000
- 1,000
100,000
100,000
100,000
» 1,000
100,000
<100
ISO
ISO
250
0
0
0
0
0
100
0
0
200
0
100
0
0
0
0
100
100
0
too
so
150
100
100
100
0
4950
100
250
50
100
250
so
50
0
0
ISO
0
150
350
250
so
so
0
200
0
ro
-------
INACTIVE URANIUM MINES IK THE UNITED STATES
SOURCE I DOE, GRAND JUNCTION, COLORADO
PACE 39
MINE NAME
CONTROLLER NAME
COUNTY
SEC. TOiJSSHIP
***«***»*« COLORADO
(CONT'D) »»»»»»»«
VALLEY VIE*
VALLEY VIEW-N.ST
VAN
VANABLEfcP 47
VANADITE
VANADIUM KING
VENTURE LODE
VICTORY 2
VIRGIN' 3
VISTA GRANDE
VONXIE 5
WATERLOO
HEDGE i
WEDGE-PI
WEDNESDAY + TCt'P
WEST
WEST LODE
WEST MARThA BELL
WHITE CM
WHITE CRO-I
WHITNEY
KILO CAT i
WILD CAT s
WILD HOFSE-COLOH
WILDCAT 3 -
WINDY DAY
WOODCHUCK
WRIGHT
YELLOW JACKET
ZEBRA
7.ELLA GROUP
GEM DANDY 3
LADY ELK 1
LAST CHANCE
LUCKY JIM 1.2+3
MAC GEORGE 4
REDSKIN MINES
SHIRLEY MAE
FRYING PA* GROUP
AVERY RANCH
ALLEN
BROWN 2
BROWN S
BURRELL 1,2+3
BURRELL 5
BUTTERFLY GROUP
E E LEWIS,INC
U1ION CARBIDE CP
ONION CARBIDE
SILVER STATE UPA
UNION CARBIDE
UNION CARBIDE
RICE + WILLIAMS
KELLY, MARK
CLEGHORN,DOUGLAS
SAM V GPA^LICH
SCOOTFR URANIUM
FOOTE MINERALS
KARVF.L MNG CO
UNION CARPIOE
UNION CARRIDE
UNION CARBIDE CP
MAGIC UPANIIJM en
IILLIAMS, D.L.
UNIQrt CARPIDE CP
COLE + MITCHELL. + WH
FOSTER, LY"AN
UNION CAPPIOE CP
BURNETT, ULLIA.M
MICRO COPPER
UNION CARBIDE CP
MICRO COPPER
UNION CARBIDE
MOAB TREASURE UP
WELLS ENGLISH+ST
UJUQN CARPIDE CP
UNION CARBIDE CP
UNION CARBIDE CP
JOHNSON, HUGO W.
MARTIN OUAYLE BR
AR'lIHF, JOHN
WARD + FEEtEY
FOUR STAR EXPL.C
YELLOW QUEEN URA
REDSKIN MINES IM
CADDIS MINING
ASPEN MINING CO.
CLIFF + CREEK UP
E.+ h.LEASING CO
DEVEREAUX BROS.
DEVERFAUX BROS,
LYLE FRANCIS
MINIER,DOROTHY
JRJ MNC.
MONTROSE
MONTROSE
MONTROSE
MONTROSE
MONTROSE
MONTPOSE
MOCTR05E
MOHTROSE
MONTROSE
MONTROSE
MONTPOSE
MONTROSE
MONTROSE.
MONTROSE
MONTROSE
VONTROse
MONTPOSE
"lONTRQSE
VQNTROSE.
MOHTROSE.
"ONTPOSE
MONTROSE
MONTPOSE
MONTROSE
MONTPOSE
MONTPOSE
MONTROSE
MONTPOSE
MONTROSE
MONTPOSE1
"ONTROSE
MONTPOSE
PARK
PARK
PARK
PARK
PARK
PARK
PARK
PUEBLO
RIO BLANCO
RIO BLANCO
RIO BLANCO
RIO BLANCO
RIO BLANCO
RIO BLANCO
e
20
12
29
29
22
31
22
2
34
20
to
2
22
35
31
1
3
35
28
27
11
21
3
23
1
27
33
31
16
26
16
6
48 N
47 N
46 N
48 H
47 N
47 N
46 N
47 N
47 N
46 N
43 N
47 tl
47 N
47 N
46 N
49 N
45 N
45 N
47 N
4<) N
46 N
48 N
48 N
47 l>
48 x
45 N
48 N
48 N
46 N
48 N
10 S
11 S
18 S
RANGE
19.0 M
17.0 W
17.0 w
16.0 K
17.0 w
17.0 W
17.0 W
0
17.0 W
20.0 W
0
19.0 w
18.0 V
17.0 K
20.0 V.
17,0 W
18.0 W
0
17.0 K
20.0 W
19.0 w
17.0 W
1S.O W
18.0 W
18.0 W
18.0 W
17.0 W
19.0 W
18,0 W
17.0 W
17.0 V
17.0 W
18.0 w
0
0
0
75.0 W
0
0
76.0 W
0
66.0 W
0
0
0
0
0
0
MEPID.
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
06
06
06
MINING
METHOD
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNOERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDEPGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO.
UNDERGRO
UNOERGRO
SURFACE
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERCRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
'UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
TOTAL PRODUCTION
(TONS AS OF 01/01/79)
DEPTH
(FT.)
1,000 - 100,000
1,000 - 100,000
100 - 1,000
<100
1,000 100,000
1,000 - 100,000
<100
<100
1,000 - 100,000
<100
<100
<100
<100
1,000 - 100,000
1,000 - 100,000
1,000 - 100,000
<100
100 - 1,000
1,000 - 100,000
<100
<100
1,000 - 100,000
<100
100 - 1,000
1,000 » 100,000
100 - 1,000
100 - 1,000
<100
<100
1,000 100,000
1,000 -. 100,000
100" - 1,000
100 - 1,000
100 - 1,000
<100
<100
100 - 1,000
100 - 1,000
<100
100 - 1,000
. <100
1,000 - 100,000
<100
100 - 1,000
<100
1,000 - 100,000
100 - 1,000
1,000 - 100,000
0
50
0
100
0
ISO
0
50
350
0
0
100
0
250
100
600
250
150
200
0
50
400
0
0
100
0
so
0
0
150
0
0
100
50
50
50
50
50
50
0
100
100
0
200
200
ISO
100
100
I
K)
cn
-------
INACTIVE URANIUM MINES IN THE UNITED STATES
SOURCE! DOE, GRAND JUNCTION, COLORADO
PACE 2<
MINE NAME
CONTROLLER NAME
COUNTY
SEC. TOWNSHIP
RANGE MERID.
MINING
METHOD
TOTAL PRODUCTION
(TONS AS OF 01/01/79)
DEPTH
(FT.)
»*»«»*«** COLORADO
(CONT'D)
CHRIS
COAL CREF.K 1
COLLARING 1
CVE>ING STAR
FRYING PAN 1
LAST DAY
LUCIL 106
M.+G.
HARVINE VIE* 10
MIDNIGHT GROUP
MIDNIGHT MH
NAOMI ANN
RIO BLANCO
S.+G. 4
SHYLO GROUP
ST. LUE
T.B.
TWIN STAR 500
UTE CROUP
WINDY POINT i
BEGINNERS LUCK 3
BOBCAT LODE
BONITA GROUP
LA RUE 2
LITTLE INDIAN 36
LOOKOUT 22
LOS OCHOS
MARSHALL PASS 5
MEPCUPY 1
MOCKING BIRD
PAM LODE
RAM + RAM 1
SEC. 3 NH NE.O T-
CLK PAHK MINE
CRAYSILL
ADA BF.LL
ALCHEMIST
APRIL
AVA JAY
BABE 1-4
BACHELOR
BALD EAGLE
BAY MULE
BEAN 10
BEAK 15,16,+ 17
BEAK 2 » 3
BEAN 4 + 5
BEAN 6
PHILLIPS, CLAYTOH
DEVEREAUX BROS.
DEVEREAUX BROS,
DEER TRAIL MINES
PAYTON, NORMAN
MC ALESTER FUELS
JONES W.S.
IOKA URANIUM CO
DEVEREAUX BROS.
HARP, HARPY H.JR
HA«P, HARPY H.JR
VC ALES1EF FUF.L
RIO BLANCO CORP
C.ARCY EXPL.+ MNG
DEVEREAUX BROS.
SMITH, LOUISE
TONCSTEf IIRAMIUK
TWIN STAR WINING
GENTRY >.M.«i.
MIKE MIZOKAMI
PHIPPS, O.F.
D + J URANIUM
CANADIAN HOLLY
HOKESTAKE VC C/
MONARCH EXPL.CO.
HOHESTAKE M«G CO
UNCOMPAHGPE EXPL
COL TEX
GARDNER, JOE
CALIF. UTAH PETRO
PIKE MINING CO.
GUNNISO* MIMING
GADDIS
FOOTE
HARMON A.J.
FUJI! K + HALL i
B + K MINING CO
FRITZ EPICKSON I
WILLIAMS, RAY L.
HERRING, JAMES
SPENCER MINING
UNKNOWN CONTPOLR
ATLAS-FOOTE
ATLAS-FOOTE
ATLAS-FOOTE
ATLAS-FOOTE
ATLAS-FOOTE
IH RIO BLANCO
RIO BLANCO
RIO BLANCO
IS RJO BLANCO
RIO BLANCO
,S RIO BUNCO
RIO BLA:VCO
1 RIO BLANCO
RIO BLANCO
IR RIO BLANCO
IR RIO BLANCO
RIO BLANCO
RIC BLANCO
1C RIO BLANCO
RIO BLANCO
RIO BLANCO
IK RIO BLANCO
1C RIO BLANCO
RIO BLANCO
RIO BLANCO
SAGUACHE
SAGUACHE
SAGliACHE
SAGUACfE
/ SAGUACHE
SAGUAC"!:
0 SAGUACHE
L SAGUACKE
SAGUACHE
SAGUACHE
0 SAGUACHE
SAGUACHE
SAGUACHE
SAN JUAN
SAN JUAN
SAN MIGUEL
B SAN MIGUEL
SAN MIGUEL
M SAN MIGUEL
SAN MIGUEL
SAN MIGUEL
c SAN MIGUEL
R SAN MIGUEL
SAN MIGUEL
SAN MIGUEL
SAN MIGUEL
SAN MIGUEL
SAN MIGUEL
30
27
33
3
18
28
16
4
25
11
30
32
31
5
5
5
47
46
46
48
48
47
40
40
45
43
44
45
44
44
44
43
43
43
N
N
M
N
N
N
N
N
K
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2.0 E
6.0 E
6.0 E
2,0 E
6.0 E
0
0
0
0
2.0 T.
7.0 H
9.0 w
19.0 W
10,0 K
0
20.0 W
0
18,0 W
16.0 K
0
19.0 W
19.0 K
19.0 W
19,0 W
19.0 V
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDER.GRO
SURFACE
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
Uf'OERGBO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
USDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERCHO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDER5RO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
1,000
100
1,000 -
too
1,000 -
1,000 -
100
1,000 -
100
100
1,000 -
100
MOO, 000
1,000
1,000 -
100
1,000
1,000 -
1,000 -
1,000 -
1,000
1,000 -
1,000 -
"100
<100
100,000
- 1,000
<100
<100
100,000
<100
<100
- 1,000
100,000
100,000
- 1,000
<100
<100
100,000
<100
<100
<100
<100
- 1,000
<100
<100
- 1,000
<100
100,000
- 1,000
<100
<100
<100
<100
.<100
100,000
<100
100,000
<100
- 1,000
100,000
100,000
<100
100,000
100,000
<100
100,000
<100
100,000
100,000
- 1,000
0
100
50
100
0
0
0
0
0
100
550
50
150
100
100
0
0
0
50
0
50
so
100
50
too
50
350
0
50
50
0
50
100
50
0
0
0
0
too
so
300
50
0
100
too
100
100
so
I
ro
-------
INACTIVE URANIUM MINES IN THE UNITED 'STATES
SOURCE I DCE, GRAND JUNCTION, COLORADO
PAGE 27
MIKE NAME
CONTROLLER NAME
COUNT*
SEC, TOWNSHIP
»»»* COLORADO
(CONT'D) »*»******
BEAN PATCH
BEAP CREEK
BETTY JANE 2
BIG BUCK 1
PIG CHIEF
BIG "EDICINE
BIG S
BLACK BIRD
BLACK rox
BLACK JACK
BLACK KING S
BLK.SP1P.-RED AN
BLUE MOON
BLUEBIRD
BLUFF
BPETTON + MORCOT
RROrfN MULE
BUCKHOPN
BUGWINE
BULL MOOSE
BULL SNAKF. GROUP
BURRO POINT
CANYOS
CANYON VIF>
CAPE HAIRS
CEOAR RIDGE GROU
CHARLES T. J
CHARLES T. 2A
CHARLOTTE 1
CHESTA
CHIEF 1-3
CHINNESE
CHIPMONK
CHIPMUNK 1
CLEAR CREEK
CLEAR VIE*
CLirr DWELLER
COLORADO CAT
CONE 1-6
COWHAND 2
CRUCIBLE
CUP 1
CURTIS
CUSCO
CYCLE 3
DELUXE * MASTER
DEREMO DU^PS
DICKIE I + 3
ATLAS-FOOTE
rOOTE MINERALS
UNKNOWN CONTROLP
CLOSSON.DAMEL S
UNION CARBIDE CP
EMTESS OIL + URA
DUNCAN + SANCHEZ
ATLAS-FDOTE
DUNCAN R L MININ
ATLAS-FOOTE
BACHELOR CORP.
C.L. STEWART
DAVIS + GOFORTH
DULANEY MNG.
UNION CARBIDE CP
BPETTO* +MORCOTT
BLAIR, FLOYD
BROHN, E.R.
BALDRA,HEK"AN M.
THOMPSON, T,E,
URANIUM PfOCESSE
SCHUMACHER,J 1
KEOGH + SHUM-AY
DUNCAN P L MININ
BARRETT + RROWN
BILL MIKING co
CANFIELD, ARTHUR
CANFIELD, JRTHUR
LLOYD/ fcf.RLE D.
NEW DEAL MNG CO
FRITZ ERICKSON V
WILLIAMS*^ GEHE
PETPO NUCLEAR
AZTEC MINING CO.
UNKNOWN CONTROL*
LYENS, W.E.
SKALLA, A.F.
5NYDER, LEE
ATLAS-FOOTE
BOLDRA,HERMAN M.
NIELSOS, ELMER
R1SENHOOVER.NATH
SAN JUAN LEASING
LUBBOCK MNG.CO.
SEARS, RALPH
SITTON + SITTON
UNION CARBIDE CP
B.E.K.CORPORATIO
SAN
SAN
SAN
S»N
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SA1
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
8A»
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
MIGUEL
MIGUEL
MIGUEL
MIGUEL
MIGUEL
MIGUEL
MIGUEL
MIGUEL
MIGUEL
MIGUEL
MIGUEL
MIGUEL
MIGUEL
MIGUEL
MIGUEL
MIGUEL
MIGUEL
MIGUEL
MIGUEL
MIGUEL
MIGUEL
MIGUEL
"IGIJEL
MIGUEL
MIGUEL
MIGUEL
MIGUEL
MIGUEL
MIGUEL
MIGUEL
MIGUEL
MIGUEL
MIGUEL
MIGUEL
MIGUEL
MIGUF.L
MIGUEL
MIGUEL
MIGUEL
MIGUEL
MIGUEL
MIGUFL
MIGUEL
MIGUEL
MIGUEL
MIGUEL
MIGUEL
MIGUEL
5
4
26
29
23
32
8
5
28
30
16
24
3S
7
34
31
32
12
16
S
10
26
16
35
6
9
15
30
31
7
28
43
42
44
43
45
44
43
43
43
43
45
43
45
43
43
45
43
42
4S
43
43
45
45
44
42
44
44
44
45
43
43
N
N
S
N
N
N
N
N
V
N
N
N
N
N
ti
N
N
H
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
K
RANGE
19.0 M
10.0 H
0
20.0 W
18.0 W
19.0 V
18.0 W
19.0 K
18.0 W
19.0 W
0
19.0 K
18.0 W
20.0 W
1§,0 K
0
.16.0 V
18,0 W
19.0 K
19.0 W
18.0 W
18.0 V
0
18.0 K
0
0
19.0 W
0
0
18,0 W
0
0
18.0 W
19.0 W
0
17.0 *
17.0 W
19,0 W
19.0 W
19.0 W
10.0 W
0
18.0 W
0
0
0
0
0
[RID.
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
MINING
METHOD
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
SURFACE
UNDERCRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERCRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UVDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERCRO
UNKNOWN
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNOERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
SURFACE
UNDERCRO
DUMPS
UNDERGRO
TOTAL PRODUCTION
(TONS AS OF 01/01/79}
1,000
1,000
100
100
100
1,000 -
1,000 -
100
100
100
loo
100
1,000 "
1,000
100
100
1,000 -
100
1,000 -
100
100
100
1,000 -
100 -
1,000
1,000
100,000
100,000
<100
<100
- 1,000
- 1,000
<100
<100
- 1,000
100,000
<100
100,000
- 1,000
<100
1,000
<100
<100
' 1,000
- 1,000
<100
1,000
100,000
100,000
- 1,000
<100
<100
1,000
100,000
<100
- 1,000
100,000
<100
" '1,000
- 1,000
<100
<100
« 1,000
<100
100,000
<100
-------
INACTIVE URANIUM MINES IN THE UNITED STATES
SOURCEl DOE, GRAND JUNCTION, COLORADO
PAGE 21
MINE NAME
CONTROLLER NAME
COUNTY
EEC, TOWNSHIP
RANGE MERID.
MINING
METHOD
TOTAL PRODUCTION
(TONS AS OF 01/01/79)
DEPTH
(FT,)
*********** COLORADO
(CONT'D) »»»*
DOLORES RJVEP
DOLORES RIVER
DONALD HILL
DONEGAN LEASE
DRAGON
DUNCAN
DURASGO + L
EARLY HORN GROUP
ECLIPSE
EMPIRE GROUP
FAIR VIEW
FALL CREEK CROUP
FIREFLY 3
FIVE POINTS
FLORENCE
FOX CROUP
FOX GROUP
FRACTION
FRACTION 1
FRANCE
FRANCES
FRANKLIN 1 + 2
FRAZIEP
FPENCHY 2
FULL MOON GROUP
C.M.D. I
GAP
GERALD T.
GIA«T
CLEN 27
GOFORTH HOMESTEA
GOLDEN ROD 1
GOLDEN ROD 2
GOLDEN POD 4
GOPHER
GOVERNOR MINE
GRASS FLAT
GRASSY HILL
GREEN ARROW
GROUND HOG
GROUND HOG DUMP
GRUB STAKE
GYPSUM HOMESTEAD
HALLOWEEN
HAPPY JACK
HAWK-FRANKIE
HAYMAKEF-SUNSET
HAZEL
FOOTE MINERALS
DOLORES RIVER BN
UNION CARBIDE CP
KELSON +LANGTON
ALMOHT MINES INC
UNION CAPSIDE CP
OLIVER BROS
D.C. BUNKER MINE
UNION CAPBIOE CP
ORTMEYEP MINING
UNKNOWN CONTROL?
FOOTE MINERALS
E.E,LE»IIS,INC,
FIVE POINTS URAN
HAMILTON, VERL
BURWELL MINING
MILLING JACK
DULANEY MINING C
DULASEY MNG
FRITZ ERICKSON M
UNION CARBIDE
TORRES, DAVID
BENNETT * ROSE
ORTMAYEP MINING
UNION CAPBIDE C
DOWELL H.L.
REED, EDGAR J.
MATTERHORN MNG.
UNION CARBIDE CP
BOSKY, HENRY
DAVIS MINING CO
FAHRION +SAGRILL
ATOMIC ENFRGY CO
JOHNSON+HARGRAVE
SCHUMACHEP.J I
CAPITOL SEABOARD
SHUMWAY+ DADE
COPDER Oil, + MNG
UNKNOWN CONTROL?
PICKCN3,CHARLES
FOUR COPNFRS OIL
S1YDER,C.F.+SONS
BELL, PIPL W.
NICHOLStCRECELI
FOOTE MINERALS
»TLAS-rOOTE
UNION CARBIDE CP
DAVIS, TRENTON
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
8AN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
MIGUEL
MIGUEL
MIGUEL
MIGUEL
MIGUEL
MIGUEL
MIGUEL
MIGUEL
MIGUEL
MIGUEL
MIGUEL
MIGUEL
MIGUEL
MIGUEL
MIGUEL
MIGUEL
MIGUEL
"IGUEL
MIGUEL
MIGUEL
MIGUEL
MIGUEL
MIGUEL
MIGUEL
MIGUEL
MIGUEL
MIGUEL
MIGUEL
MIGUEL
MIGUEL
MIGUEL
MIGUEL
MIGUEL
MIGUEL
MIGUEL
MIGUEL
MIGUEL
MIGUEL
MIGUEL
MIGUEL
MIGUEL
MIGUEL
MIGUEL
MIGUFL
MIGUEL
MIGUEL
MIGUEL
MIGUEL
15
8
26
33
24
10
7
ft
10
20
33
24
29
15
16
19
24
28
15
11
14
14
21
29
32
24
21
21
23
33
4
16
29
44
43
45
44
44
44
43
43
43
43
46
43
43
43
43
44
45
44
43
43
43
43
45
43
44
45
45
45
44
45
45
43
45
N
N
M
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
«(
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
18
10
1C
19
17
18
10
19
19
19
19
11
19
18
16
18
19
18
19
19
19
19
18
19
18
19
18
18
19
18
19
19
18
0
0
.0
.0
0
.0
.0
.0
.0
0
0
.0
0
0
0
0
0
.0
.0
.0
0
.0
.0
.0
.0
0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0.
.0
.0
.0
.0
0
.0
.0
.0
.0
0
.0
,0
.0
0
K
V
V
V
N
K
V
w
K
w
W
h
K
K
u
w
w
w
w
w
K
w
N
w
w
w
w
w
fc
w
w
w
W
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNOERGHO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRD
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNOERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
DUMPS
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
1,000
100
1,000 -
1,000 -
1,000 -
100
100
100
100
1.000 -
100
100
1,000 -
1,000 -
100
100
100
100
1,000 -
1,000
1,000 -
loo
1,000
1,000 -
1,000 -
1,000 -
100
1<000
100
100
<100
100,000
<100
<100
- 1,000
<100
<100
100,000
<100
<100
<100
100,000
100,000
<100
- 1,000
<100
- 1,000
- 1,000
- 1,000
100,000
<100
- 1,000
- 1,000
100,000
100,000
<100
<100
- 1,000
- 1,000
- 1,000
<100
;- 1,000
100,000
100,000
100,000
- 1,000
100,000
<100
<100
100,000
100,000
<100
100,000
-------
INACTIVE URANIUM MINES IN THE UNITED STATES
SOURCEl DOE, GRAND JUNCTION, COLORADO
PAGE 39
MINE NAME
CONTROLLER NAME
COUNT*
SEC. TOWNSHIP
»******»* COLORADO
(CONT'D) «»*»
HOGBACK
HORSESHOE 1
HORSESHOE 2
HORSESHOE 3
HORSESHOE 4
HORSESHOE 5
HORSESHOE 6
HORSESHOE 7
HORSESHOE BEND 1
HOT DRILL 11
HOT SHOT
HOT SPOT
HOYMAN LEASE
I.V.
INDEPENDENCE
INSPIRATION 1
INSPIRATION 15
J.J. 2
J.V.EAVESSON LSE
JACK KNIFE 3
JACK-0-LANTERN
JACKIE L.
JACKIE WALLS 3
JACKKNIFE 3 fc
JACKPOT CROUP
JIM 2
JOE BUSH CROUP
JOE DANDY
JUPITER
KATE MEYEPS
KATIE
KEYSTONE
KLONDIKE
LA SALLE
LAST CHANCE
LAST HOPE
LATRICIA
LEE MOCK
LEOPARD VANADIUM
LIBERTY BELL
LITTLE CHIEF
LITTLE HELEN
LITTLE MARIE
LITTLE MAX
LITTLE ROY
LIZZIE G
LONE PEAK 1-3
LONE STAR CROUP
DAVIS, TRENTON SAN MIGUEL
BROOKS MINERALS SAN MIGUEL
BROOKS MINERALS SAN MIGUEL
BROOKS MINERALS SAN MIGUEL
BROOKS MINERALS SAN MIGUEL
BROOKS P1NER4LS SAN MIGUEL
BROOKS MINERALS SAN MIGUEL
CENTURY MNG+DEVE SAN MIGUEL
CENTURY MNG+DEVE 8AN MIGUEL
UNITEn URAN CORP SAM MIGUEL
SCHUMACHER,J I SAN MIGUEL
AYERS, EVERETT SAN MIGUEL
DAWSQM.k.S. SAN MIGUEL
DULAHEY MINING C SAN MIGUEL
GOXfZ + GUPWELL SAN MIGUEL
LEECO GAS + OIL SAN MIGUEL
S1TTON F A SAN MIGUEL
SMITH * PETERS SAN MIGUEL
ALAHADO MNG.CO. SAN MIGUEL
SCHUMACHER,J I SAN CIGUEL
DALE DILLON SAN MIGUEL
DULANEY MINING C 8AN MIGUEL
FRITZ EPICKSON M SAN MIGUEL
SCHUMACHER J I SAN WIGUEL
PROWN » VIPIGHT SAN MIGUEL
DAVIS » GOFDRTH SAN MIGUEL
THOMPSON, E, SAN "IGUEL
NEILSOM, C, SAN MIGUEL
DU'ICAN WALTER SAN MIGUEL
BLIXT, ALFRED SAN MIGUEL
DALPEZ, MARIO SAN MIGUEL
FAHIIION +SAGRILL SAN MIGUEL
LAKALUCRE MINES SAN MIGUEL
ATLAS-TOOTE SAN MIGUEL
GREENRIVER OIL 4 SAN MIGUEL
JIM BUTT SAN MIGUEL
DOYLE M A SAN MIGUEL
KAMHOLZ, ROY SAN MIGUEL
BENNETT +CORNETT SAN MIGUEL
MALICK, ELI SAN MIGUEL
BALORA,HERMAN M. SAN MIGUEL
COFORTH, KM. SAN MIGUEL
THOMPSON+GRIBELE SAN MIGUEL
UNION CARBIDE CP SAN MIGUEL
6NYDER,C.F.*SONS SAN MIGUEL
c NEILSON SAN MIGUEL
PIONEER URAV INC SAN MIGUEL
J » J MNG, SAN MIGUEL
19
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
11
16
15
17
33
33
27
16
32
8
36
16
16
11
26
8
32
24
14
1
30
23
24
20
I
26
IP
23
28
28
8
32
4
43 N
42 N
42 W
42 N
42 N
42 N
42 N
42 N
42 H
45 N
43 N
43 N
45 N
45 N
43 N
45 N
44 N
43 N
44 N
45 N
44 1
42 N
43 N
43 N
43 N
43 N
43 N
43 N
44
44
43 N
43 N
43 N
44 N
43 N
44 N
43 N
43 N
43 N
43 N
43 N
RANGE
19.0 K
17.0 N
17.0 V
17.0 W
17.0 H
17.0 W
17,0 <*
17.0 W
0
18.0 *
18.0 W
0
0
19.0 h
19.0 N
18.0 «
18.0 u
0
19.0 W
18.0 W
18.0 W
l«.o w
20.0 W
18.0 w
17.0 W
ie.o w
19.0 W
10.0 w
lfl.0 w
0
19.0 V.
19.0 ₯
17.0 W
19.0 W
19.0 W
20.0 W
19.0 W
19.0 w
11,0 w
0
0
le.o K
19.0 K
18.0 W
18,0 H
10,0 W
1S.O W
19.0 H
MERID.
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
72
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
MINING
METHOD
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACp
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDEPGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNOERGRO
SURFACE
SURFACt
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGKO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNCERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERCRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
TOTAL PRODUCTION
(TONS AS OF 01/01/79)
DEPTH
(FT.)
100 - 1,000
100 - 1,000
100 - 1,000
100 - 1,000
<100
1,000 - 100,000
100 - 1,000
100 - 1,000
1,000 100,000
<100
1,000 - 100,000
<100
1,000 - 100,000
<100
<100
100 - 1,000
<100
<100
<100
1,000 100,000
<100
<100
1,000 - 100,000
100 - ,000
100 - ,000
100 » ,000
100 ,000
100 - ,000
100 - 1,000
<100
<100
loo - 1,000
<100
1,000 - 100,000
<100
100 - 1,000
100 1,000
<100
too - 1,000
<100
<100
<100
<100
100 - 1,000
<100
100 » 1,000
100 - 1,000
100 - 1,000
50
0
150
150
0
0
150
150
150
850
150
0
BOO
0
0
0
0
0
0
100
0
0
so
100
0
0
0
0
150
0
50
0
50
0
100
0
200
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
100
50
I
ro
10
-------
INACTIVE UPANIUM MINES IN THE UNITED STATES
SOURCE! DOE, GRAVD JUNCTION, COLORADO
PACE JO
MINE NAME
CONTROLLER NAME COUNTY
SEC. TOWNSHIP RANGE MERJD.
TOTAL PRODUCTION
(TONS AS Of 01/01/79)
DEPTH
en.)
***« COLORADO
(CUNT'O) »»*»*«**
LONESOME 34
LONG RIDGE+L.R.
LOOKOUT
LOST
LOST BROTHERS
LOST DOG
LSE. 875,8. IS, NW4
LUCKY 1 * JOE RA
LUCKY 8
LUCKY DAY
MAC INTYPE CLAIM
MAGPIE
MAINSTREET
MARGARET C, 1-6
MARIE
MARIE 1
MAPNE GROUP
MARTHA SUE
MARY 2
MARY JANE-BROAD'-
HARY M.
MAY DAY
MAYBE 1 + 2
MAYFLOWER
MC KEE GROUP
MC MILLAN
MEMPHIS 1+2
MERCANTILE
MERCANTILE 1
MERCANTILE 2
MERCANTILE 3
MERCANTILE BETH
MERCANTILE BRIGH
MESA 7
MESA HILL
MICKEY 3
MIDNIGHT
MINERAL MINES
MINERAL MOUNTAIN
MINERAL MOUNTAIN
MINERAL MOUNTAIN
MINERAL MOUNTAIN
MINERAL MTN
MINERAL MTN 3 t
MINERAL MTN. 3
MINING LEASE i
MINING LEASE 17
MINING LEASE 18
PIONEER UPAV INC
UNION CARBIDE CP
PETRO NUCLEAR
SEARS, RALPH
CROWN URANIUM CO
KAYFIELD, JERRY
ST. OF COLORADO
UNITED UPAN CORP
PIKES PEAK URAN.
DALPEZ, MARIO
ORTMRYEB. VUG CO
DOYLE M K
PETRO NUCLEAR
TORRES, DAVID
TRE JOINT VENTUP
TRE JOINT VENTUR
FOOTE MINERALS
SNYDER, FRANK
ORTMAYEP MINING
HOPKINS MNC, co
FRONTIER VAN*UPA
BALLS, E.M.
ROGERS, W.A
NIELSON + SOr-'S
RICE, JOE
UNKNOWN CONTHOLR
LEE t SMALL
OULANEY MNG CO
SITTON + DULANEY
SITTON + DULANEY
SITTON + DULANEY
DULANEY MINING C
DULANEY MINING C
DEVEREAUX BROS.
SNYDER. C.F.+SONS
BAIRD+SNYDER MNG
URANIUM METALS
WRIGHT, L.B.
WRIGHT, L.B.
KRIGHT, KEITH
WRIGHT, L.h.
WRIGHT, L.B.
WRIGHT L
WRIGHT, CLYDE
WRIGHT, L.B.
SKIDMORE, T.H.
TURNER, JACK C,
MC CORMICK, WM.P
SAN MIGUEL
SAN MIGUEL
SAN MIGUEL
SAN MIGUEL
SAN MIGUEL
SAN MIGUF.L
SAN MIGUF.L
SAN MIGUEL
SAN MIGUEL
SAN MIGUEL
SAN MIGUEL
SAN MIGUEL
SAN MIGUEL
SAN MIGUEL
SAN MIGUEL
SAN MIGUEL
SAN MIGUEL
SAN MIGUEL
SAN MIGUEL
SAN MIGUEL
SAN MIGUEL
SAN MIGUEL
SAN MIGUEL
SA« MIGUEL
SAN MIGUEL
SAN MIGUEL
SAN MIGUEL
SAN MIGUEL
SAN MIGUEL
SAN MIGUEL
SAN "IGUEL
SAN MIGUEL
SAN MIGUEL
SAN MIGUEL
SAN MIGUEL
SAN MIGUEL
SAN MIGUEL
SAN MIGUEL
SAN MIGUEL
SAN MIGUEL
SAN MIGUEL
SAN MIGUEL
SAN MIGUEL
SAN MIGUEL
SAN MIGUEL
SAN MIGUEL
SAN .MIGUEL
SAN MIGUEL
23
23
33
27
16
e
24
36
16
7
19
29
32
11
22
32
26
33
22
29
18
18
18
IB
19
17
31
20
27
28
30
28
44 N
44 N
45 N
45 N
43 N
43 N
43 N
45 N
45 N
43 N
43 N
43 N
43 N
43 N
45 N
43 N
46 N
44 N
45 N
45 N
43 N
43 >
43 N
43 N
43 N
43 N
44 N
43 N
44 N
43 K
44 N
43 N
0
17.0 K
19.0 W
18.0 W
18.0 W
19.0 w
0
18. 0 M
0
19.0 w
0
18.0 M
18.0 w
16.0 W
19.0, W
19.0 w
1R.O K
19.0 w
0
18.0 W
0
18.0 V
17.0 w
19.0 w
18,0 w
0
18,0 W
19.0 V»
19.0 w
19.0 w
19.0 w
19.0 W
19.0 W
17.0 H
0
19.0 K
19.0 w
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
19.0 W
18.0 W
19.0 W
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
UNDERCRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERCRO
UNOERGRO
UNDERGRO
UHDERGRO
SURFACE
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNOERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNOERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
1,000
1,000 -
1,000 -
100
100
loo
1,000 -
1,000 -
1,000 -
100
100
1,000
1,000 -
1,000 -
100
too
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
1,000 -
1,000 -
1,000 -
100,000
100,000
100,000
1,000
- 1,000
- 1,000
<100
<100
<100
100,000
<100
100,000
100,000
<100
- 1,000
- 1,000
100,000
<100
<100
100,000
<100
<100
<100
<100
<100
<100
<100
100,000
- 1,000
<100
<100
<100
- 1,000
<100
- 1,000
<100
- 1,000
- 1,000
o
-------
INACTIVE URANIUM MINES IN THE UNITED STATES
SOURCE] DDE, GRAND JUNCTION, COLORADO
PAGE 11
MINE
CONTROLLER NAME
COUNTY
SEC. TOWNSHIP
*»»»**** COLORADO
CCONT'D) »«»«
MINING LEASE 20
MINING LEASE 21
MINING LEASE 27
MINING LEASE 28
MINING LEASE 29
MIN1HG LEASE 30
MINING LEASE 32
MINING LEASE 4
MINING LEASE 42
MINING LEASE 43
MINING LFASF 44
MINING LEASE 45
MINING LEASE 46
MINING LEASE 6
MITCHEL*CUCHER c
MONTEZUMA
MONUMENT 4
MOQUI JUG
MORTGAGE LIFTER
MUCHO GRNOCDQL.R
MULE GROUP
MULESHOE 6
HYSTEPY
NATIONAL
NELLIF GRAY
NEW DEAL
NIGGER HEAD
NORMA JEAN 1+2
NORTH CON MILL
NORTH SLOPE 2
NORTHEP 5 + 6
NORTHERN LIGHT
OMEGA
OWENSBY
PAINTED ROCK
PARROT GROUP
PAYSTREAK 3
PECAS 1
PENIGAL
PENJU
PHILLIPS 66 1
PINE BUG
PITCHFORK
POLARIS 1
POUR orr
PROSPECTORS FORT
OUEEN OF SPADES
RADIUM
SAS JUAN LEASING
BAIRD+ROBI»ETTE+
GAMBLIN +KNQWLES
DUNCAN + SANCHEZ
ORTMEYER «NG CO
HARGROVE J.Y,
BLUE CREEK MININ
DULANEY MNG CO
BLIXT,ALFRED +OS
KA4HOLZ, ROY
ATOMIC ENERGY co
CRO-XLFY J.R.
GAYNO MINING CO
HOLLIVG, HENRY
FnOTE MINERALS
OrfENEY, H.B.
TRISTY + PYFRLY
UWIOH CARBIDE CP
*ILLIA«S + CONN
BROOKS MINERALS
HILL+OUNCAN»BUFF
HILL+QUNCAKtBUFF
BARRETT + BSEWER
CPISTEA .''NG.CO.
MADOOX.C.1:.
E H JQHNNSEN
MOTLEY, R.C.
UNION CARPIDE CP
TURNER,, ACE
ATLAS-FOOTE
UNION CARPIDE CP
KOTZ, EARL
UNKNOWN
UNKNOWN CntJTROLR
PRETTY BLUE *NG
BROOKS MINERALS
UNION CARBIDE CP
UNITED URAN CORP
DALPEZ, MARIO
JACK THOMPSON
PHILLIPS, DORR
TURNER + SMITH
BOKUM COPPORATN
HAVERLY MINING C
UNKNOWN CONTROLR
ROBERTS RUTH
THUNDER8IRD URAN
ATLAS-FOOTE
SAN MIGUEL
SAN MIGUEL
SAM KIG'JEL
SAN MIGUEL
SAN MIGUEL
SAN MIGUEL
SAN MIGUEL
SAN M1GUFL
SAN MIGUEL
SAN MIGUEL
SAN MIGUEL
5»K MIGUEL
SAN MIGUEL
SAN MIGUEL
SAN MIGUEL
SAN MIGUEL
SAN MIGUEL
SAK MIGUEI,
SAN MIGUEL
SAN MIGUEL
SAN MIGUEL
SAN MIGUEL
SAN MIGUEL
SAM "IG'JEL
SAN MIGUEL
SAN MIGUEL
SAN MIGUEL
SAN MIGUEL
SAN MIGUEL
SAN "IGUEL
SAN MIGUEL
SAN MIGUEL
SAN MIGUEL
SAN MIGUEL
SAN MIGUEL
SAN MIGUEL
SAN MIGUEL
SAN MIGUEL
SAN MIGUEL
SAN MIGUEL
SAN MIGUEL
SAN MIGUEL
SAN MIGUEL
SAN MIGUEL
SAN MIGUEL
SAN MIGUEL
SAN MIGUEL
SAN MIGUEL
26
5
36
32
29
31
30
10
5
IS
30
23
14
19
29
4
1
22
2ft
36
2D
5
22
19
35
16
31
26
30
24
7
24
29
32
25
19
5
44 N
43 N
44 N
44 N
43 N
44 *
43 H
44 N
43 N
43 N
43 N
44 ll
44 N
45 N
43 N
43 N
43 N
42 N
43 N
43 N
44 N
43 N
43 t.
44 N
44 N
44 N
43 N
44 N
43 N
43 N
43 *
43 N
44 N
43 N
44 N
45 H
43 N
43 N
RANGE
19,0 V
18.0 H
19,0 K
1S.O K
19.0 w
in.o K
0
19,0 K
18.0 W
19.0 V
10.0 W
19,0 h
ia.o »
19.0 w
ie.o w
18.0 W
0
18.0 W
19.0 w
18.0 W
0
1R.O K
ie.o »
0
0
0
20.0 (
18,0 «
0
19.0 K
19.0 W
18.0 V
11.0 V
19.0 w
18. P W
18.0 W
18.0 W
0
19.0 W
16.0 W
17.0 K
19.0 K.
16.0 h
0
0
19.0 W
18.0 u
19.0 W
MERID.
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
MINING
METHOD
UVDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERCRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGHO
UNOERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGHO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGHO
SURFACE
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERCRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDCRGRO
UNDERGRO
TOTAL PRODUCTION
)NS AS OF 01/01/79)
1,000 - 100,000
1,000 100,000
100 - 1,000
1,000 - 100,000
1,000 - 100,000
1,000 - 100,000
1,000 - 100,000
MOO, 000
<100
1,000 - 100,000
1,000 - 100,000
1,000 - 100,000
1,000 - 100,000
1,000 - 100,000
100 - 1,000
-------
INACTIVE URANIUM MINES IN THE UNITED STATES
SOURCE! DOE, GRAND JUNCTION, COLORADO
PACE 12
MINE
CONTROLLER NAME
COUNTY
SEC. TOWNSHIP
RANGE
TOTAL PRODUCTION
(TONS AS Or 01/01/79)
DEPTH
(FT.)
»*»**»* COLORADO
(CONT'D) *»
RADIUM 1
RADIUM 12
RADIU" 19
RADIUS 22
RADIUM 24
RADIUM 25
P.ADIU". 26 + 27
RADIUM 29
RADIUM 3
RADIU" 4
RADIUM S 4 6
RADIUM 6
RADIUM 7
RADIUK B
RAINY DAY
RAMBLER
RAT HOLE
RATTLESNAKE
RATTLESNAKE
RATTLESNAKE 1
RED ANT
RED HORSE
RED ROCK 4*5
RED ROCK 5
REP SNAKE
RED TOP
RED TOP
RED WING
REX CLAIM
P1M
RIVERVIEW
ROBERT M
ROBERTA JEAN
ROSF. JUNK
ROY LEE
8.B.GROUP
SAGE 11
SAN MIGUEL
SANTA MARIA
SARA M.
SARAH ELLEN
SARAH JANE
SCHLEE
SIBLEY
SINGLE JACK
SLICK RIM
SLICK ROCK MILL
SPRING %
S1TTON F A
ATLAS-FOOTE
ATLAS-FOOTE
ATLAS-FOOTE
ATLAS-FOOTE
ATLAS-FOOTE
ATLAS-FOOTE
ATLAS-FOOTE
ATLAS-FOOTE
ATLAS-FOOTE
ATLJS-FOOTE
ATLAS-FOOTE
ATLAS-FOOTE
ATLAS-FOOTF.
UNION CARBIDE CP
UNI01 CARBIDE CP
ROGERS, JACK
.RUTKEPFOPD, R.F,
KNIGHT, N.B.
CARKHUFF.CAMPBEL
KNUCKLES, W.T.
UNION CARBIDE CP
BROOKS MINERALS
BROOKS MINERALS
JE«ELI,, LOREN
SULLIVAN, BILL
JOHNSON, HUGO fc.
SALES, BURT
REEn, EDGAR J.
DPI^KAPD, JOHN
UNIOM CARBIDE CP
MARLANG, J,* C.
HAMPTON R.J.
MARLANG, FRED
BROOKS MINERALS
DYER, GUY B.
SHUM.'AY* DADE
ATLAS-FOOTE
SKIDMORE, T.H.
FOOTE MINERALS
GPIPE R,
TORRES, DAVID
SNYDEP,ROBERT A.
DULANEY MINING C
CRISTEA MNG.CO.
ROSENQUIST,HOMER
SKYLAND SALES,IN
UNION CARBIDE CP
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
S\N
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
MIGUEL
MIGUEL
MIGUEL
MIGUEL
MIGUEL
MIGUEL
MIGUEL
MIGUEL
MIGUEL
MIGUEL
MIGUEL
UGUKL
MIGUEL
MIGUEL
MIGUEL
MIGUEL
MIGUEL
MIGUEL
MIGUEL
MIGUEL
MIGUFL
MIGUEL
MIGUEL
MIGUEL
MIGUEL
MIGUEL
MIGUEL
MIGUEL
MIGUEL
MIGUEL
MIGUEL
MIGUEL
MIGUEL
MIGUEL
MIGUEL
MIGUEL
MIGUEL
MIGUEL
MIGUEL
MIGUEL
MIGUEL
MIGUEL
MIGUEL
MIGUEL
MIGUEL
MIGUEL
MlGUr.L
MIGUEL
5
4
5
32
5
5
5
5
4
4
8
9
8
9
35
9
19
4
30
2*
35
35
6
9
23
1
33
16
16
34
11
32
8
14
26
26
26
17
26
16
9
43
43
43
44
43
43
43
43
43
43
43
43
43
43
45
44
43
45
43
45
43
43
42
44
44
42
45
44
44
43
42
43
43
43
43
43
43
43
44
45
44
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
H
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
n
N
N
N
N
N
N
K
N
N
N
19.0 K
19.0 W
19.0 k
19.0 w
19.0 W
19.0 W
19.0 W
19.0 W
19.0 W
19.0 W
19,0 W
19.0 W
19.0 W
19.0 H
18. 0 W
17.0 h
0
0
ie.o v
19.0 K
19.0 W
18.0 W
18.0 W
18,0 K
0
17.0 W
1 B , 0 W
17.0 W
0
18.0 W
18.0 W
17.0 W
0
17.0 W
18.0 »'
18.0 V
I9.fi H
19.0 K
19.0 M
18.0 V
18.0 fc
0
19.0 v.
19.0 N
11.0 W
18,0 W
0
18.0 W
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNOERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDEHGBO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNOERGRO
UNDERCRO
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
UNDERGKO
UNDERGRO
UNOERGRO
UMDERGRt)
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UfcDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNOERGRO
UNDERGHO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGHO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
li
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1.
1,
1,
000 -
100
000
100
000
100
ooo -
000 -
000 -
000
000 -
000 -
000 -
000 -
ooo
100
000 -
000 -
000 -
000
100
100
too
100
<100
100,000
- 1,000
<100
100,000
<100
- 1,000
100,000
- 1,000
100,000
100,000
<100
100,000
100,000
100,000
100,000
1,000
<100
ooo
- 1,000
ooo
0
150
too
100
100
0
too
150
0
too
100
0
150
0
50
0
0
0
0
100
100
150
250
100
so
0
50
0
0
0
50
0
0
0
150
4950
300
100
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
so
0
0
-n
i
CO
-------
INACTIVE URANIUM MINES IN THE UNITED STATES
SOUPCEl DOE, GRAND JUNCTION, COLORADO
PAGE 11
MINE NAME
CONTROLLER NAME
COUNTY
SEC. TOWNSHIP
»*»»«»» COLORADO
(CONT'D) ««»»»«*
SPUD PATCH
STAR
SUNDAY
SUNDOKN
SUNDOWM GROUP
SUNN'YSIDE
SUNRISE
SUNRISE + PATENT
SUNRISE 1
SUNRISE 3, 4, *
SUNSHINE 6
TAILHOLT
TERRIBLE
TEXAS CHIEF 1
TORNADO
TWO BlR
UINTAH J LODE
UNCLE SAM
UNCLE SAH(GYP VA
UTE 4
VALLEY VIEW
VAN
VAN.QUEENtSLK RK
VANADIUM
VANADIUM 1
VANADIUM OUEEH G
VAWUPA CLAI«S
VICTOR
VICTOR 2
VIRGINIA
WALLY-DOUBLE JAC
WHIZ BANG
WINDY DAY-BELL
WYOMING
YELLOW GIPL
YELLOKBIRD-RADIU
YORKTON
ZEBRA
ZEBRA 1
ABRIL 2.6+8
GENEVIEVE LODE
SEC. 36 SwO NEO
UNION CARPIDE
OLIVER + PUSS
LEE H, MOBRIS
LU8BOCK M^C.CO.
8 + 8 DINING CO.
BURNETT + CO
ATLAS-FOOTE
ATLAS-FOOTE
ATLAS-FPOTE
ATLAS-FOOTE
AYERS, EVFRETT
CHAPLFS PICKEN5
MAYFIF.LD, JERRY
KUYKENOALL «ELMO
UNION CARBIDE CP
UNION CARBIDE CP
UNION CARBIOE CP
TUCHSC4ER, C.L.
ALTMAN+FELLER+JA
UNION CARPIDE CP
CRAHDELL, MARION
FOSTER. LYMAN
TORRES, PAVID
SHIPROCK.LTD
MATTERS, h,R.
UNION CARBIDE CP
MC DOUGALD + ViRIGH
SHORT, ELPEPT
REED, EDGAR J,
BISHOP CANYON UP
JOHANNSEN E.J.
BERTOCH, E.H.
FOOTC MINERALS
HUNt, V.F.
DRINKARD, JOHN
LYLE FRANCIS
ATLAS-FOOTE
DAMSON,W.S.
ROCKMELL, ALVA A
GARNER, MILLARD
CURTIS + THORPE
TRANS MTN.URAN+G
COTTER COPPOkATN
SAN MIGUEL'
SAN MIGUEL
SAN MIGUEL
SAN MIGUEL
SAN MIGUEL
SAN MIGUEL
SAN MIGUEL
SAN MIGUEL
SAN MIGUEL
SAN MIGUEL
SAN MIGUEL
SAN -"IGUEL
SAN MIGUEL
SAN MIGUEL
SAN MIGUEL
S»N MIGUEL
SAN MIGUEL
SAN MIGUEL
SAN "IGJEL
SAN MIGUEL
SAN MIGUEL
SAN MIGUEL
SAN MIQUFL
SAN MIGUEL
S«N MIGUEL
SAN MIGUEL
SAN MIGUEL
SAN "IGUFL
SA" MIGUEL
SAN MIGUEL
SAN MIGUEL
SAN MIGUEL
SAN MIGUEL
SAN MIGUEL
SAN MIGUEL
SAN MIGUEL
SAN MIGUEL
BAN MIGUEL
SAN MIGUEL
SAN MIGUEL
TELLER
TELLER
TELLER
29
30
29
27
25
32
5
5
21
27
10
JO
3
24
IB
6
in
4
19
12
17
31
23
12
11
7
20
14
3
ft
IS
4
19
30
36
43 N
43 V
43 N
44 N
45 N
44 I'
43 N
44 N
43 N
43 N
44 N
44 N
45 N
44 N
45 N
44 N
43 N
42 H
44 N
45 N
45 N
46 N
44 N
44 N
44 N
44 N
44 N
43 N
43 N
43 N
45 N
43 N
30 S
43 N
45 N
15 S
IS S
RANGE
18.0 W
18.0 W
ie.o w
19.0 W
19,0 K
ie.o «
19.0 W
19.0 *i
19,0 K
19,0 W
17.0 w
19.0 W
19.0 M
0
16.0 W
19.0 W
17.0 It
19.0 *
17.0 V
18.0 W
19.0 w
1B.O W
17.0 W
20.0 *
18.0 K
17.0 fc
20.0 H
18,0 V
16.0 K
19.0 t»
0
16.0 W
19.0 W
16.0 W
24.0 E
0
19.0 w
18.0 W
0
0
70,0 w
0
70.0 W
MERID.
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
24
22
22
22
06
MINING
METHOD
UKDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDEPGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UN'DERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNOERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
TOTAL PRODUCTION
NS AS OF 01/01/79)
1,000 - 100,000
<100
100 1,000
<100
<100
100 - :,ooo
1,000 - 100,000
1,000 - 100,000
1,000 - 100,000
100 - 1,000
<100
1,000 - 100,000
1,000 - 100,000
<100
1,000 - 100,000
100 - 1,000
1,000 - 100,000
<100
100 - 1,000
1,000 - 100,000
-------
INACTIVE URANIUM MINES I« THE UNITED STATES
SOURCE! DOE, GRAND JUNCTION, COLORADO
PAGE 14
MINE NAWE
CONTROLLER NAH£
COUNTY
SEC. TOWNSHIP
RANGE MERIO,
MINING
METHOD
TOTAL PRODUCTION
(TONS AS OF 01/01/79)
DEPTH
(ri.)
IDAHO
«*«
COAL CREEK GROUP
EAST BASIN CREF.K
ELK 1-DEERSTRIKE
LIGHTNING GROUP
SHORTY GROUP
DONNA LOU 1
LAUB, DON CUSTER
EVANS, E.K. CUSTER
LAUB, DON CUSTER
UNKNOWN CONTROLP CUSTER
UNKNOWN CONTROLP CUSTER
UNKNOWN CONTROLR LEMHI
n
15
6
11 N
n N
11 N
14
14
14
.0
0
.0
0
.0
0
E
E
E
OB
08
08
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
1,000 -
1,000 -
1,000 -
100
1,000 -
100.000
100,000
100.000
- 1,000
100.000
<100
so
100
100
so
50
0
««« MISSOURI *»«»«*.»
ST LOU ARPT PSID COMMERCIAL Dl ST. LOUIS
MISC.-PB
1,000 100,000
50
*»****> MONTANA
ft******************
COBBAN LEASE
BOB 6
BUCKHCRv 2
DANDY-MARlF-PLPC
FRAN
KEY
OLD GLORY
PEARL
PERC GROUP
SANDRA
SNAIL 1
SrfA"P FPPC
HALDRON
UNIT 3
FREE ENTERPRISE
HAYNES HOMESTEAD
LONE EAGLE GROUP
BUM GROUP
UNKNOWN CONTROL!*
HIDDEN SPLENDOR
MIDWEST EXPLRATW
BICE MINING CO
UNKNOWN CONTROL*
PIG HORN HNG CO.
PRYOR '4INING CO
BICE MINING CO
MICHAUO, I.L.
MIDLAND «NG, CO.
COLOTAK URANIUM
STOICK, JAKES J.
KALDRON, P.
TEXAS INSTRUMENT
ELKHOhN MINING
LENHART, PAYMOND
EISELEIN, AH ETA
POWELL, K.W.
BPOAO^ATER
CARBON
CARBO*
CHRBON
CARBON
CARBON
CARBON
CARBON
CARBON
CARSON
CARBON
CARBON
FALLON
HILL
JEFFERSON
JEFFERSON
JEFFERSON
MADISON
20
n
26
8
32
8
19
31
26
9
9
9
9
8
9
10
8
7
N
s
s
s
s
s
N
N
S
1
27
?i
27
27
27
61
4
.4
.0
.0
.0
.0
0
0
.0
0
.0
0
0
0
,0
0
0
0
.0
.0
E
E
r.
t
E
E
E
W
W
23
23
23
23
23
23
05
23
23
SURFACE
SURFACE
UMDERGSO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
SURFACE.
UNDERGRO
UNOERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
SURFACE
UNOERGRO
SURFACE
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
100
1,000 -
100
100
100
100
100
100
too
-------
INACTIVE URANIUH MINES IN THE UNITED STATES
SOURCEl DOE, GRAND JUNCTION, COLORADO
PACE It
MINE NAME
CONTROLLER NAME
COUNTY
SEC. TOWNSHIP
RANGE MERID.
HIKING
METHOD
TOTAL PRODUCTION
(TONS AS OF 01/01/79)
DEPTH
RIVER ROAD
BROKEN P0« GROUP
CAROL R
BLACK BONANZA
ARMSTRONG 1
8UCKKORS
FLAGG SECTION
LOWARY CLAIMS
RED BLUFF
TICK. CANYON
MOUNT, LLOYfl
HOUCK, EDWARD
BIG M URANIUM CO
FLAMINGO WINING
ARMSTRONG, APOEN
DELAVF.GA, T.R.
NORTH AMERICA" A
LOWAPY URAN CO.
OE LONGCHAMPS F.
COURVOISIEP.CHAS
JERSFY «»**#«<
LYON
MINERAL
MINERAL
NYF.
W»SHOE
WASHDE
WASHOE
KASHOE
KASHOE
WASHOE
»**«**
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNOCRGRO
UNOERGRO
100
100
100
100
<100
<100
1,000
<100
<100
1,000
<100
1,000
1,000
<100
too
0
50
so
50
50
50
50
so
50
UNKNOWN
UNDERGRO
<100
50
BABY MINE
KIDNICHT (PCPHll'
RED BASIN
SEC. 21, 3^-16" WE
BLUE STAR
FLOYD COLLI1S
INEZ-SEQ24-20S-1
SEC. 21. IBS-IS*
POLITA 2.17N-29E
NAPANE SEC 25 PI
29-14.09 MINE «A
ALTA (5+6-11-4)
B HILL 18*23(5EC
BARB J 2(30, 13-1
BARB J ) (30-13-
BARB.J 1 (30-13-
BG-GRPC20-13-9)
BILLY THE KID
BLACK JACK 2
BLACKJACK 1
BLUE PEAK{24-13-
BOBC»T NEQ24-13-
C D+S (35-16-17)
CNAPLOTTE(33-13-
CHILL *1LLS(PALT
CHURCHROCK (8*17
CLIFFSIDE 8FC J6
DAKOTAM-1 JN-104
DAVENPORT(20-1J-
THREE ELEVEN HNG
GULF K1NEPAL
HAYSTACK HTN.PEV
STATE OF NE-I MfX
LEACH » LfACH
LEACH, A.».
WF.STF.PM EXPLtlRAT
STATE OF NfW M£X
PACHECO.J. AND 8.
BAKER WILDER SYN
RKERR "CGEE
CITRUS CNTY LAND
CITRUS CNTY LSNP
SMITH DEVFLP1NT
MID-CONT kNG.COR
MID-CONT MNG.COR
UNITED NUCLEAR
HENRY ANDREWS
INDIAN ALLflTEE
INDIAN ALLOTEE
GARCIA * ANDREWS
HYDE ESTATE
SANTA FE PACIFC
SAMA FE PACIFC
MAROUEZ, NABOR
UNITED NUCLEAR
KERR-MCGEE CORP.
STATE OF NEW *EX
HYDE ESTATE
CATPOM
CATPO-J
CATRON
CATPON
DONA ANA
GRANT
GRANT
GPANT
HARDIVG
HIDALGO
KCKINLEY
MCKINLEY
MCHNLEY
HCKINLCY
KCKINLEY
MCKINLEY
MCKINLEY
MCKINLEY
MCKINLEY
HCKINLEY
MCKINLEY
MCKINLE»
hCKINLFY
MCKINLEY
MCKINLEY
MCKINLEY
MCKINLEY
MCKINLFY
MCKINLEY
it
1«
21
5
6
20
JO
30
30
20
19
IB
12
24
24
35
33
24
17
4
20
2
2
3
17
14
13
13
13
13
13
14
15
15
13
13
16
13
13
16
13
13
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
h
N
N
N
N
N
N
0
11.0
10.0
l(i.O
0
0
0
0
29.0
0
0
11.0
s.o
0.0
v.o
9.0
9.0
11.0
13.0
13.0
10.0
9.0
17,0
9.0
9.0
16.0
0
10.0
9.0
Vi
w
fat
F
fc
'«
te
W
h
W
K
V
H
b
I.
W
K
K
W
w
W
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
SURFACE -
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
MhATPROD
U«iDEHGRO
UNDfRGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNOERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDCRGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
LOdGRADE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
100
100
100
,000
,000 -
,000 -
> 00,000
,000 "
,000 -
,000 -
MOO, 000
MOO, 000
1,000 -
100
1,000 -
MOO, 000
1,000 -
1,000 -
<100
1,000
<100
<100
<100
- 1,000
1,000
<100
<100
<100
<100
100,000
100,000
100,000
100,000
100,000
100,000
100,000
<100
<100
i.ooo
100,000
100,000
100,000
<100
0
50
0
0
0
50
50
0
so
0
0
200
150
250
SO
400
200
SO
250
700
0
0
SO
0
450
650
0
0
150
1
OJ
cn
-------
INACTIVE URANIUM MINES IN THE UNITED STATES
SOUPCEl DOE, GRAND JUNCTION, COLORADO
PAGE 36
MINE NAME
CONTROLLER NAME
COUNTY
SEC. TOWNSHIP
RANGE MERID,
MINING
METHOD
TOTAL PRODUCTION
(TONS AS Or 01/01/79)
DEPTH
*»*«*»«
DIAMOND 2 LARGO
DYSART 1 SEC 11
DYSART 2
E.MALPAIS 20-13-
CLKIKS (24-14-12
EVFLYN (9-14-U)
FAITH (29,13-09
FLAT TOP 1 2 3
FLAT TOP VIL HYC
FOUTZ 1
FOUTZ 2
FOUTZ 3
FRANCIS
HOGAN (14-13-9)
HOGBACK 3-5
ISABELLA(6+7, 13-
LOST ^INE(35-14-
MAC 2(17+16,15-1
MALPAIS MINK
MARQUCZ (23,13-0
M»RY NO.I
MESA TOP (20-U-
MVAJO PCS
RED CAP (T-GROIIP
RED POI»T 16-11-
REOTOP 1+2(1*-14
SANTA FE CHRIST
SEC 16 13'J 9«
SEC 17 13 9
SEC 17 14s 9* LO
SEC 18 13-4 9<<
SEC 20 14.1 9* LO
SEC 22 14v 10* L
SEC 22,14-10
SEC 23 13" 10-
SEC 24 14M 10* L
SEC 2* BECENTI
SEC 29 14N 9W LO
SEC 30 14« 9M LC
SEC 31 14N «x
SEC 33,14-9(ONLY
SEC 33-14-09 LO
SEC 36 13M 10«
SEC. 10-14N-10W
BCC.18.13N-104 S
SEC.24-13N.11W N
SEC.25-13N-10» S
SEC.26-13';-10« N
MEXICO (CONT'D) ...........
5H1PHOCK.LTD
HOMESTAKE-U.N.
UNITED N. HMSTKE
FOUR CORNERS EXP
ELlU^S.l ArJRE.MCE
CITRUS CNTY LAND
RANCHERS FXP.DEV
HYDE ESTATE
HYDE ESTATE
FOUTZ MNG.CO.
FOUTZ VNG.CO.
FOUTZ 'ING.Cn,
CITRUS C"TY LAND
UNITED N. HMSTKE
HYDF ESTATE
M. P. GPAC1C
£VLP"WT.
STATE OF NE* "IX
UH'i.MNG
CO
STATE OF NEi* HEX
SANTA FE PACIFIC
KERR-«CCEF CORP.
CITRUS C«TY LAND
KERR CCGEF
KERP MCGtE
KERR MCGEK
SANTA FE PACIFC
KERP MCGtE
TUCKER, A.w.
KRRR KCGEF.
KERR MCGEF
KEPR-MCGrS CORP.
KEPP MCGtF
ICERR-^CGEF
STATE OF NEW MEX
UMTD NUC HOMSTKE
V»NOEVER,N.
VANDKVCR,
CITRUS CNTY LAND
CSEOEPO, N.
RFD
PEi
MCKINLCY
MCKINLF.Y
"CK1NLEY
*CKINLEY
MCKINLKY
"CKINLEY
"CKINLEY
MCKINLF.Y
*CKI'JLEY
KCKINLSY
"CKIMjEY
KCKI'iLKY
MCKINLE.T
MCKINLFY
MCKINLFY
MCKINLFY
MCKINLEY
MCKIWLEY
"CKISLEY
MCKINLEY
MCKINLFY
^-CKINLEY
MCKIMLEY
^CKINLEY
MCKI'JLfY
"CKIMLEY
MCKINLEY
MCCIf.'LEY
MCKJVLEY
"CKIML^Y
MCKIMLEY
MCKINLCY
MCKINLEY
KCKINLFY
HCKINLCY
MCKINLEY
MCKINLEY
CCKINLEY
MCKINLEY
MCKINLEY
MCKINLFY
MCKI^LFY
MCKINLEY
MCKINLEY
>-CKINLEY
MCKINLEY
MCKINLEY
MCKINLEY
33
11
20
9
29
30
30
4
31
S
14
12
1
35
18
20
24
11
20
1»>
14
16
17
18
22
23
28
31
29
36
10
IB
24
25
26
15
14
13
14
13
13
13
15
If.
14
13
15
13
14
15
13
13
14
13
13
14
13
13
13
14
10
15
14
14
13
14
13
13
13
13
f
N
^
^
N
N
N
N
rl
N
*
N
V
N
N
N
a
n
it
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
17.0
10.0
0
9.0
0
11.0
9.0
9.0
9.0
16.0
0
16.0
11.0
9.0
16. 0
9.0
11.0
13.0
9.0
9.0
10.0
9.0
0
0
10. 0
11.0
0
9.0
9.0
0
9.0
0
0
10.0
13.0
0
17.0
0
0
9.0
9.0
0
10,0
10.0
10.0
11.0
10.0
to.o
w
K
k
w
V
V
in
h
1
It
V.
»
u
X
h
K
rt
V
w
u
w
K
w
w
h
k
VI
W
k
'r
W
M
W
U
U
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
72
22
22
22
22
22
22
UNDERCFtO
UNDErtGRO
USDERGRO
UNDCPGRO
UNDERGRO
.UNOERGKO
UNDERGHO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGKO
UNDERGRO
UNOESG90
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
ONDERGRO
UNOERGRO
UNOERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNOERGrtO
UNDERGRO
UNnERGRO
SUHFACE_-
UNOERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGHO
LO>iGRADC
UNDESGRO
LO^GRADF.
LO^GRADE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
LOmGRADE
UNDESGRO
LO«GRADC
LOrfGBADE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
LOWGRADE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
1,000 -
MOO, 000
MOO, 000
1,000 -
1,000 -
l.ooo -
100
1,000 -
100
100
1,000
100
MOO, 000
1,000
1,000 -
1,000 -
1,000 -
MOO, 000
MOO, 000
MOO, 000
MOO, 000
100
100
100
,000 -
,000 -
,000 -
,000 -
,000 -
,000'-
M00,000
1,000 '
MOO, 000
100
1,000 -
MOO, 000
1,000 '
MOO, 000
MOO, 000
1,000 -
MOO, 000
1,000 -
1,000 -
MOO, 000
1,000 -
100,000
100,000
<100
100,000
100,000
- t.ooo
100,000
- 1,000
- 1,000
100,000
- l,0f>0
100,000
100,000
<100
100,000
100,000
- 1,000
- 1,000
- 1,000
<100
100,000
100,000
100,000
100,000
100,000
100,000
100,000
- 1,000
100,000
100,000
100,000
100,000
100,000
100,000
300
400
4SO
200
50
50
300
100
SOO
SO
too
50
0
300
0
300
100
250
200
250
350
200
0
50
50
50
0
200
200
0
150
0
0
650
SO
0
50
0
0
600
700
0
50
400
ISO
SO
100
50
CO
en
-------
INACTIVE URANIUM MINES IN THE UNITED STATES
SOURCEl DOE, GRAND JUNCTION, COLORADO
PAGE 17
MINE
CONTROLLER NAME
COUNT*
»*»**» NE* MEXICO (CONT'D) «
SEC.3-1S-ULIGN1
SEC. 30-13-9 WH 5
SEC.31.13t.-09«
SEC.32,13N.9W
S£C.32-15«J-ll/< s
SEC.32-151-1M S
SEC. 33-15-11 »H»
S£C,5,13N-10W
SECTION 23-I6N-1
SILVER BIT
U MINE (4-15-16)
VALLCJO cstc. 34
KESTWATKP i
WHITECAPS
LEDOUX RA*CH
COOP LUCK
SEC.12,11N-33E
TWP.11N+12N-33E
BOX CANYON
COYOTE HILLS
J.O.I,,
LUCKY STRIKE
PINEAPPLE « PALO
RED HEAD 2
TUSAS F.AST SLOPE
WHITF.FLCI i
BUTLEP RROTHEHS
COLLINS
CORRAL 3
14
ALO'ICO MINE
B B
B B B
BECLA8ITO
BEGAY 1
BEGAY 2
CANYON VIEW
CAFL YAZZIE 1
CASTLE TSOSIC
OENEH NEZ 1
EAST NEK -EXICO
EAST RESERVATION
ENDS JOHNSO" 1-4
H B ROY 3
HOC BACK 2
HORACE BE" 1
JACK BOYD CLAIMS
STATE OF HE* HEX
BAILEY » FIFF
SANTA FE PACIFC
STATE OF N.",
HYDRO NUCLEAR
HYDPO NUCLEAR
RANCHERS FXP.nEV
SANTA rr. PACIFIC
GRACE NUCtEAR
CLKINS,LAURENCE
CITHUS CllTY LAND
CHRISTENSfN E&T
FAKRIS WISES
STATE OF VT.il «EX
SMITH DEVEI.PHNT
GALISTEO MINING
DENNIS, L.T.
HIGHLAND DEVEL.C
LITTLr RATTLF.R M
BOX CANYON HNG.
IJ*' LAMDtlNVEST.
ARPIBA URANIU" C
ARROYA DE AGUA M
kCLLS, S.H.
BOI.IVA3 IIRA«IU«
COLONIAL URANIUM
WHITEFLO MNG.CO.
6UTLFR PROS.
ZIA INO. RES.
SLA Trx VENTURE
MEAOOV.S ".IKING C
NAVAJO TRIFC
NAVAJO TRIBE
NAVAJO TRIBE
NAVHjn TRIBE
NAVAJO TPIBF
NAVAJO TRIBE
NAVAJO TRIBE
NAVAJO TRIBE
NAVAJO TRIBE
NAVAJO TRIBE
NAVAJO TRIBE
NAVAJO TRIBE
FAY WILLIAMS
NAVAJO TRIBE
DAVIDSON, WILLIE,
NAVAJO TRIBE
BOYD, JACK
HCKIMLCY
MCKINLFY
MCKINLEY
MCKINLF.Y
MCKIMLEY
MCKINLCY
MCKINLEY
MCKINLEY
XCKINLCY
MCKINLEY
KCKINLEY
MCKI»LEY
MOF»
OUAY
QUAY
QUAY
RIO ARRIFIA
RIO ARRIBA
RIO A»RIBA
RIO APRIBA
RIO *RBIRA
RIO ABRIBA
RIO ARRIBA
RIO APPIfA
SANPOVAL
SANUOVAL
SANDOVAL
SAN JUAN
SAN JUAN
SAN JUA).
SAN JUAN
SAN JUAN
SAN JUAN
SAN JUA!-
SAN JUAN
SAN JUAN
SAN JUAt,
SAN JUAN
SAN JUAN
SAN JUAN
SAN JUAN
SAN JUAN
SAN JUAN
SAN JUA','
SAN JUAN
SEC.
3
30
31
32
32
32
33
23
10
31
4
34
30
24
30
24
30
23
21
?5
23
JWKSHIP
15 M
13 N
13 N
13 N
15 N
15 M
15 N
16 N
14 N
14 N
15 N
13 N
13 »
11 N
7 N
36 N
26 N
28 N
23 W
19 N
17 «.
23 N
IV H
25 N
DANCE
16.0 U
9.0 »
9,0 H
9.0 n
11.0 K
11.0
11.0
0
17.0
12.0
10.0
16.0 W
9.0 >
0
9.0 to
16.0 E
32.0 E
0
0
0
0
7.0 F
0
9.0 C
n
7.0 E
1.0 r
1.0 'I
1,0 W
1.0 E
0
0
0
0
0
0
21.0 W
0
0
0
0
0
0
20,0 V
0
0
0
0
MERID.
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
MINING
METHOD
UNDCRGRO
UNDEAGPO
UNOERGRO
UNOCRGRO
UMOERGRD
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNKNOWN
UNOERCRO
UNDERGHO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
UNDESGRO
UNDERG30
SURFACE
SURFACE
UNDFRGRO
UNDERGRO
UNOE'RGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNOEPGRO
UNOERGRO
UNOCAGPO
UNPERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNKNOWN
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
SURFACK
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
TOTAL PRODUCTION
NS A3 OF 01/01/79)
100 « 1,000
1,000 100,000
1,000 - 100,000
1,000 - 100,000
1,000 - 100,000
1,000 - 100,000
1,000 - 100,000
<100
<100
100 1,000
,000 - 100,000
,000 - 100,000
,000 » 100,000
,000 - 100,000
,000 100,000
ooo
<100
<100
<100
100 - 1,000
<100
ooo
<1UO
<100
<100
-------
INACTIVE URANIUM MINES IN THE UNITED STATES
SOURCEi OOE, GRAND JUNCTION, COLORADO
PAGE 38
MINE NAME
CONTROLLER NAME
COUNTY
SEC. TOWNSHIP
RANGE MEPID.
MINING
METHOD
TOTAL PRODUCTION
CTONS AS Of 01/01/79)
DEPTH
(fT.)
«**«*»*« NEW MEXICO (CONT'D) «««.,..«..
JOE BEN ]
JOHN JOE 1
JOHN JOHN HP 334
JUNCTION
KEY TOME
KING 2
KING TUTT 1
KING TUTT POINT
KINGS 6
LOWER CANYON
NELSON POINT
PLOT 1 RED .NASH
PLOT 2 KING TUTT
PLOT 7 OAK SPRIN
PLOT 8 COTTONKOO
PLOT 9 LOSE STAR
REED HENDERSON 1
ROCKY FLATS MINE
SALT CANYON
SHADYSIDE
SHADYSIDE 2
SHIPROCK RESIDUE
6UNNYSIDE
TENT 1
UPPER SALT kASH
BISH 2
SPARKS-STONE 1
WINDY NINE MINK
LA BAJADA
SAN JOSE CLAIMS
EMPIRE CLAIMS
LAST CHANCE
MITCHELL PRICE 1
PARAN
PITCHBLEND STR1K
ST KIN LEASE 61
AUGUA TOP.RFS
HOOKS RANCH
JETER MINE
LITTLE DAVIE
LUCKY DON SEC 15
MARY BALL 1
SAM LORENZO 1 NW
BLACK COPPER 2 L
BLACK HANK + BUN
CEDAR CLAIMS 1 7
CHAVEZ (22-10-3)
CHRISTMAS DAY PH
NAVAJO TRIBE
NAVAJO TRIBE
NAVAJO TRIBE
NAVAJO TRIBT.
NAVAJO TRIBE
NAVAJO TRIBE
NAVAJO TRIRE
NAVAJO TRIBE
NAVAJO TRIPE
NAVAJO TRIBE
NAVAJO TRIBE
NAVAJO TRIBE
NAVAJO TRIBE
NAVAJO TRIBE
NAVAJO TRIPE
NAVAJO TRIBE
NAVAJO TRIBE
NAVAJO TRJ6E
NAVAJO TRIBE
NAVAJO TRIBE
NAVAJO TRIBE
NAVAJO TPIBE
NAVAJO T"IBE
NAVAJR TPIBE
NAVAJO TRIPE
FURMAN+FOSTER
SPARKS STONE MNG
SAN CARLOS URAN
LONE STAR MNG+DV
ROYBAL, J.C.
THE EMPIRE PROJ.
ALAMO MINING CO.
PRICE BUELL
SAMANIEGO.BERNIE
TERRY, EAPL H.
AUGER,ROBERT
CAHP9ELL FARMING
LUMMUS, R.H.
CAPITOL SEABOARD
SANTA Ft PACirc
LUMMUS, R.H.
CAMPBELL FARMING
CRIEGO, jnE
BLACK COPPER MIN
GRANTS STATE BNK
YUCCA URANIUM
CANONCITO IND.RS
UNKNOWN CONTROLR
SAN JUAN
SAN JUA«
SAN JUAN
S»N JUAN
SAN JUAN
SAN JUAN
SAN JUftN
SAN JUAN-
SAN JUAfc
SAN JUAN
SAN JUAK
SAN JUAN
SAN JUAN
SAN JUAN
SAN JUAN
SAN JUAN
S»N JUAN
SAN JUAN
SAN JUAf.
SAN JUAN
SAN JUAN
SAN JUAN
SA1 JUAN
SAN JUA'«!
SAN JUAN
SAN MIGUEL
SAN MIGUEL
SAN MIGUEL
SANTA FE
SANTA FE
SIERPA
SIEHPA
SIERRA
SIERRA
SIERRA
SIERRA
SOCOPRO
SOCORRO
SOCORRO
SOCORRO
SOCOPRO
SOCORRO
SOCORRO
TAOS
VALENCIA
VALENCIA
VALENCIA
VALENCIA
29
23
11
35
23
23
IS
31
5
14
9
29
13
26
4
20
22
4
39 N
26 N
29 N
30 N
29 N
29 N
24 N
17 N
16 N
17 N
'15 N
20 N
1 N
28 N
12 N
11 N
10 N
12 N
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
31.0 F
21.0 V
0
0
21.0' w
0
21.0 w
0
0
0
21.0 W
21.0 w
0
0
20.0 w
0
24.0 E
14.0 E
23.0 I
7.0 E
9.0 E
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
6.0 W
0
0
0
0
0
15.0 E
9.0 *
9.0 W
3.0 W
9.0 w
14
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
UNDESCRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
MISC.-PB
UNDERGRO
UNDEKGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNOERGRO
UNOERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
100
100
100
1,000 -
1,000 -
100
100
1,000 -
100
100
100
1,000 -
100
100
1,000 -
1,000 -
100
100
1,000 -
1,000
1,000 »
1,000 -
100
1,000
- 1,000
<100
<100
<100
<100
- 1,000
1,000
<100
<100
100,000
100,000
- 1,000
- 1,000
100,000
- 1,000
> 1,000
<100
- 1,000
<100
100,000
- 1,000
- 1,000
-------
INACTIVE URANIUM MIKES IN THE UNITED STATES
SOURCCl DOE, GRAND JUNCTION, COLORADO
PAGE 19
MINE NAI»C
CONTROLLER NAME
COUNT*
SEC. TOWNSHIP
RANGE MERID,
MINING
METHOD
TOTAL PRODUCTION
CTONS A3 OF 01/01/79)
DEPTH
-------
INACTIVE UPANIUM KINES IN THE UNITED STATES
SOUPCEr DOC, GRAND JUNCTION, COLORADO
PACE 40
MINE NAPE
CONTROLLER NAME
COUNT*
SEC. TOWNSHIP
RANGE MERID.
MINING
METHOD
TOTAL PRODUCTION
(TONS AS Or 01/01/79)
DEPTH
CFT.)
****.«« SOUTH DAKOTA (CONT'.O) «»*«»
BONATO RA'iCH
KLING LEASE
BUD-LUCKY P»D
CAYLOR LEASE
DARK i
DSL WUERTO
FREEZEOt'T GROUP
JIMROB 1
LOST CANYON 1
M.C.I
TOO LATE
URAMUH 1
ACCIDENTAL GROUP
AMY 1
APPLE PIE
B.*H.GROUP
BARKER » HOrtELL
BAXTER 1
BEADLE GROUP
BERIT 2
BITS GROUP
BLUE NOTE
8UDA-OEXTER
CHILSflu CANYO"
CLARABELLE GROUP
COAL CANYON
COAL CANYON 1
COAL CANYON 14
CRA* LEASE
CRANOALL GROUP
CYCAD
DAKOTA FLATS
DAMSITE
DARNELL LEASE
DARROv- 1-5 AND -I
DIANE A
DRIFTWOOD CA"YON
EAGLE AEP1E 1
CDGE*ONT 6
GERTRUDE * FLORA
GET WE HICH 1
GOULD LEASES
GREEN ACRES GROU
GREEN SLIPPER 1
GULL LEASES 1-3
HELEN
HELLS CANYON GPO
HEY + FAY S + 6
ENRICO BONATO
ALEX KLING
TENN.VALLEY AUTH
WESTERN GIANT 01
DARROK + COOK
GENTLEMEN MINING
IENN.VALLFY AUTH
ROBINSON,DEL8ERT
KEP.CHFRVAL,.P.S.
KENNEDY, MIKE C.
TENN.VALLEY AUTH
CRAVE" UPA'-.CO.
LORFNZ BROTHERS
LOtD.B.H+PABY J.
ALLIED EXPL.CO.
TF.HN.VALLF.Y AUTH
TFNu.VAtLfY AUTH
BAXTER, F.R.
TFNN.VALLFY AUTH
DAKOTA URAN+DPLG
CHORD, ROV E.
CHORD, ROY E.
TEN'N.VALLtY AUTH
TEfU'.VULLf.Y AKTH
CHORD, ROY E.
CHORD, ROY E.
CHORD, ROY E.
HUFF J.V. .
TFMN.'MLLFY AUTH
TF.il.'.VALLFY AUTH
TE^'n.VALLEY AUTH
CHORD, POY E.
LORFNZ BROTHERS
DISNEY AIMING CO
TENN.VALLEY AUTH
CHORD, ROY E.
BARKER, JACES
CHILDERS, H.r.
CHORD, ROY E.
CHORD, POY E.
CHORD, ROY E.
TENN.VALLFY AUTH
ALBPIGHT.F+J
CHORD, ROY E.
TENN.VALLEY AUTH
CHOPD, ROY E.
HANSON+HAUPTHAN
FAY + HEY
BUTTS
BUTT«:
CUSTER
CUSTER
CUSTER
CUSTER
CUSTFR
CUSTER
CUSTEP
CIISTER
Cl'ST^R
25
23
34
6
36
33
B
R
6
2
6
7
N
N
S
S
S
S
CUSTER
FALL
FALL
FALL
FALL
FALL
FALL
FALL
FALL
FALL
FALL
FALL
FALL
FALL
FALL
FALL
FALL
FALL
FALL
FALL
FALL
TALL
FALL
FALL
FALL
FALL
FALL
FALL
FALL
FALL
FALL
FALL
FALL
FALL
FALL
FALL
FALL
RIVER
RIVER
RIVER
RIVFP
RIVER
RIVER
RIVER
R1VEH
RIVF.R
RIVER
RIVER
PIVf R
RIVER
PIVER
PIVEP
RIVER
RIVER
hlVER
RIVF.R
RIVEP
RIVER
RIVER
RIVER
RIVE"
RIVER
RIVER
RIVER
RIVER
RIVER
RIVER
PIVER
PIVER
gIVER
PIVER
RIVER
RIVER
31
21
24
24
3
19
If,
1?
4
75
31
2
25
24
19
26
11
19
27
19
20
8
7
B
7
e
7
7
e
e
7
e
7
7
7
7
7
e
7
8
7
7
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
1.0
1.0
i.O
7.0
0
0
1.0
0
0
0
3.0
0
4.0
0
0
0
2.0
0
3.0
0
0
2.0
3.0
0
3.0
0
2.0
0
3.0
3.0
0
6.0
4.0
0
- i.o
2.0
0
0
2.0
3.0
2.0
3.0
0
3.0
3.0
3.0
0
3.0
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
t
F
T.
f
F
E
E
E
E
E
E
r
E
E
E
E
E
07
07
07
07
07
07
07
07
07
07
07
07
07
07
07
07
07
07
07
07
07
07
07
07
07
06
07
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDKHGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
UNUEHGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERflPXJ
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
. SURFACE
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
1,000 -
MOO, 000
100
1,000 -
1,000 -
100
100
1,000 -
100
i.ooo -
100
1,000 -
1,000 -
100
1,000 -
100
100
100
*
MOO, ooo
1,000 -
1,000 -
10U
1,000 -
100
MOO, 000
1,000 -
1,000 -
1,000 -
100
100
1,000 -
<100
100,000
<100
- 1,000
1,000
100,000
100,000
100,000
- 1,000
- 1,000
100,000
'0
50
too
50
0
50
100
50
50
50
100
50
so
0
0
50
0
50
50
50
50
0
200
0
100
0
0
0
50
50
50
50
50
200
100
100
so
50
200
50
so
150
50
100
150
50
50
50
-fi
o
-------
INACTIVE URANIUM MINES IN THE UNITED STATES
SOURCE I DOE, GRAND JUNCTION, COLORADO
PACE 41
MINE NAME
CONTROLLER NAME
COUNT*
»*****»* SOUTH DAKOTA (CflNT'O) »»»»»
HI POCKETS 4
HOLDUP 15-KADOS
HOLDUP 1
HOLDUP 22
HOT POI'.T GPP
IMOGENS
JACK PINE 2
JOANN
KELLOGG flME
KING
LAKOTA LODE 11
LAZYMANS LODE
LION 1
LION-MC K"1IGHT
LITTLE ANN
LODE GROUP
LOP* I
LOPD LEASE
LUCKY 1
LUCKY STRIKE
LUCKK STRIKE
LUCKY TnsS
MARTY LEASE
WARKJAC 1 9
MATIAS PEAK
MC KNIGHT 1
NIGGER GULCH
OPHELIA >
PABST 3
PAT 2
PATSY
PAY nAY J
PEE WEE
PE«INY*ITT 1
PICTOGRAPH LODE
RABY LEASE
FIOGE PII'INER
RIPSNOPTER 1
ROAD HOG
RONENA
SEC.lt.NH SEO
SEC.36. 9S' 3E
SHAMROCK
SKINNEY SOB
SKIPPER 4
SOTO + VERDE
SOUTH VIE'' GROUP
SOUTNVIEW
CHORD, ROY f. FALL RIVEB 20 IS
CHORD, ROY E. FALL PIVER 33 7 S
CHORD, ROY E, FALL RIVER 33 7 S
CHORD, ROY E. FALL RIVER
CHORD, ROY E. FALL RIVER 28 7 S
CHORD, ROY E. FALL RIVER 19 7 S
BONER, ROY FALL RIVER
CHORD, ROY E, FALL KIVEP
TENS.VALLEY AUTH FALL RIVER 19 s s
CHORD, ROY E. FALL RIVER
LAKOTA PBOSPECTI FALL RIVER
CHORD, ROY E. FALL RIVF.P 20 7 S
TENK.VALLEY AUTH FALL RIVF.P
TENN.VALLFY AUTH FALL RIVER 12 e s
TRADE DOLLAR MNG FALL RIVEP
HILL EVERETT FALL HIVES
LnsD,H,H»PA«Y J. FALL RIVER
BAXTER. F,R. FALL PIVEP
CHORD, FOY E. FALL RIVER 26 75
EDGEMO'iT MINING FALL PIVER
BETTENHAUSFN.RAY FALL PIVER
STEVENS, FARL E. FALL RIVER
TENK.VALLEY AUTH FALL PIVFR 11 8 S
TENN.VALLFY AlITH FALL RIVFR 10 8 S
TENN.VALLEY AIJTH FALL RIVER 34 7 s
TF^N.VALLEY AUTH FALL RIVER
TF.NN.VALLEY AUTH FALL RIVER 2? 8 s
CHORD, ROY F. FALL RIVFR 19 7 S
TEN*.VALLEY AIJTH FALL RIVER 12 » s
TE'it«.VALLEY AIITH FALL RIVER
CHORD, POY E. FALL RIVER
.TENS.VALLEY AUTH; FALL RIVER
CHORD, ROY E. FALL RIVER
CHORD, ROY E. FALL RIVER
TENN.VALLFY AUTH FALL RIVER 30 7 s
BETTENHAUSEN+ MC FALL RIVER
CHORD, ROY E. FALL RIVER 26 7 S
TENN,VALLEY AUTH FALL RIVER 27 7 s
CHORD, ROY E. FALL R1VFR
CHORD, ROY E. FALL RIVER 25 78
TENN.VALLKY AUTH FALL RIVER
BETTENHAUSEN.PAY FALL RIVER
CHORD, ROY E. FALL RIVER 19 78
SMITH, POPERT B. FALL RIVER
ALLIED EXPL.CO. FALL RIVER
BEAP LODGE MNG. FALL RIVER 25 78
NICOLAY5EM+DAR. FALL RIVER 25 78
KEIP + HENDERSON FALL RIVEP
PANGC
3.0 E
3.0 F
1.0 E
0
3.0 E
3.0 E
0
0
4.0 E
0
0
3,0 E
0
3.0 F
0
0
0
0
2.0 E
0
0
0
3.0 K
3.0 f..
3.0 E
0
4.0 E
3.0 r.
3.0 E
0
0
0
0
0
3.0 E
0
3.0 E
3.0 E
0
2.0 E
0
0
3.0 E
0
0
2.0 F.
2.0 E
0
MCRID.
07
07
07
07
07
07
07
07
07
07
07
07
07
07
07
07
07
07
07
07
07
07
MINING
METHOD
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
Ui4DERGPO
UNDE-3GRO
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACS
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
UVDERGRO
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
UNDERGHO"
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
U.VDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
SURFACE
TOTAL PRODUCTION
(TONS AS OF 01/01/79)
DEPTH
(FT.)
100 - 1,000
1,000 " 100,000
100 1,000
<100
1,000 " 100,000
<100
<100
<100
1,000 - 100,000
1,000 100,000
<100
<100
1,000 - 100,000
1.000 100,000
<100
<100
<100
<100
100 - 1,000
<100
100 - 1,000
<100
1,000 - 100,000
100 - 1,000
1,000 - 100,000
1,000 - 100,000
<100
100 - 1,000
1,000 - 100,000
<100
100 - 1,000
<100
<100
100 - 1,000
1,000 - 100,000
<100
1,000 - 100.000
1,000 - 100,000
1,000 - 100,000
1,000 - 100,000
100 - 1,000
too - 1,000
1,000 - 100,000
<100
<100
1,000 - 100,000
100 - 1,000
<100
50
so
so
so
too
0
so
S3
100
so
0
so
50
so
0
0
so
50
50
0
0
50
50
50
50
so
so
50
50
so
0
50
0
50
so
50
100
0
0
50
so
100
100
so
0
100
50
0
-------
INACTIVE URANIUM MINES IN THE UNITED STATES
SOURCEi DOE, GRAND JUNCTION, COLORADO
PAGE 42
MINE NAME
CONTROLLER NAME
COUNTY
SEC. TOWNSHIP
RANGE
MERID.
MINING
METHOD
TOTAL PRODUCTION
(TONS AS OF 01/01/79)
DEPTH
(FT.)
STARLIGHT 2
TCSS
TIM SHACK 6
TRAIL FRACTION
TRAIL WIND
VIRGINIA C
HASH80APD
WESTERN EDGE
YELLO*« CAT 1
BILLY DALE 1-4
BLUE JAY 8
BOBCAT GROUP
BONE-CHOPPY
CALAMITY JANE 2
CARBONATF GROUP
CRAZY t * 2
DAISY MAY 5
ELEANOR 1
FLAT TOP GROUP
HILLTOP GROUP
JEFFERY LYNN
JIM GROUP
LAST CHANCE GrtOU
MNDAHL
LONESOME PETE
LUCKY STRIKE 2
MC CURDY LEASF
MOONSHINE
PICKPOCKET
QUAD 1 * 2
0 U I N N 6
PELF CROUP
RILEY GPO'JP
SNAKE EYE
SNOOKS
SUSAN BF.CKY
TRIO LODE
BAVARIA
STANLEY
JELD 1
KAYLOR LEASE
KOOL 10
RUBE 1
TED 1
1 DAKOTA (CONT'D)
M. I. L. UPAS. INC.
EYRICH, HAROLD R
BIEBER + MC LEOD
CHORD, ROY E.
CHORD, ROY E.
SUSOUEHANMA 4EST
LORENZ BROTHERS
, CHORD, ROY E.
CHORD, ROY E,
HENDERSON+BENNET
HAIVALA BROS,
SCHULL, LESTER
PATTERSON, A.J.
KRAUSE.MF.LVIM A.
SUNDANCE PETRO
HANSON LLFrtELYN
MTN STATF.5 MNG.
BRO*N, E.G.
CREVIEPtLUDLOW+S
HANSON LLEhELYN
MILLER, M.D.
LEMAR+PATTERSON
KALINAS BROS.
LINDAHL
HAIVALA, M.S.
LUCKY SIX MNG.
MCCURDY+STENSETH
MOONSHINE URAN.
MIJNKRF.S, WM. L.
QUAD MNG CO
VOSS OIL CO.
OLSON + OAKLAND
STEPNAD + HILL
PETERS, M.+E.
RIMROCK MINING
TRIO MINING CO,
ROCKFORD THREE S
ROCKFORD THREE S
DENEVAN L.R.
BALDWIN, r.V.
ARNOLD, THOMAS F.
PICTOGRAPH MNG.
KILLER, THEODORE
FALL RIVER
TALL RIVER
FALL RIVER
FALL RIVER
FALL RIVFR
FALL PIVER
FALL RIVER
FALL RIVER
FALL RIVER
HAPDINfi
HARDING
HARDING
HARDING
HARDING
HARPING
HARDING
HARDING
HAPDI«G
hARDIHC
HARDING
HARDING
KARDI-.G
HARDING
HARDING
HARDING
HARDING
HARDING
HARDING
HARDING
HARDING
HARDING
HARDING
HARDING
HARDING
HARDING
HARDING
HARDING
LAWRENCE
LAWRENCE
PENNINGTON
PENNINCTON
PKNNINGTOS
PENNINGTON
PENNINGTOM
26
30
19
36
34
30
22
14
29
18
24
5
27
12
23
22
20
27
26
21
29
35
13
26
23
36
29
23
18 '
7
8
7
22
21
18
22
19
21
16
17
20
22
16
21
22
22
22
21
22
16
22
16
22
22
22
22
22
16
S
S
S
N
N
N'
M
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
H
N
M
H
N
N
N
N
M
N
N
N
N
N
N
2
4
3
5
S
8
5
7
5
9
1
S
6
8
S
5
S
6
4
6
9
5
8
5
5
5
5
5
9
0
0
0
0
0
.0
.0
0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
0
.0
.0
.0
.0
0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
T
E
E
E
E
E
F.
E
r.
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
07
07
07
07
07
07
07
07
07
07
07
07
07
07
07
07
07
07
07
07
07
07
07
07
07
07
07
07
07
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACf
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
. SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
1,000 -
100
1,000 -
1,000 -
1,000 -
1,000
1,000 -
1,000 -
1,000 -
1,000 -
100
1,000 -
100
1,000 -
1,000 -
1,000 -
1,000
1,000 -
100
100
<100
<100
<100
100,000
- 1,000
100,000
100, ooo
-------
INACTIVE URANIUM MINES IN THE -UNITED STATES
SOURCE! DOC, GRAND JUNCTION, COLORADO
PAGE 4)
MINE NAKE
CONTROLLER NAME
COUNTY
SEC. TOWNSHIP
RANGE MERID.
MINING
METHOD
TOTAL PRODUCTION
(TONS AS Or 01/01/79)
DEPTH
(fT.J
*»»#««» TEXAS
TULE RANCH
WILD HORSE MINE
EUBANKS RANCH
CROWN
GARZA COUNTY EXP
HILLS1PE
«C ARTHUR moSRC
TWIN RATTLER
YELLOW CUB-SEC.4
DUDERSTADT
S«ITH E.E 14
BOSG-riACKvIFY 2
ERYSCH LEfSE
FT.WORTH NATSNK4
HAASE F.(UL1491)
HACKNEY
KELLNER LEASE 7
LA'JV. A LEASE 12
LYSSY NIESTORi
MANKA,Ji(203)
MC CPADY LEASE
MOCZYGEMBA LSE12
NIESCH*ITZ-72b
NUHN LEASE
PAWELEK TRACT
PFEIL-^EIG,303-1
SEARCY-PA-iFLEK
8ICKENTUS LEASE
SOUTH B«YSCH LEA
STOEL-NIES-BOD.8
WEDDIMGTON-SUS
KEDOINGTON-TENNE
BRIGHT LEASE 7
HURZPACH
CLAY WEST SLURRY
E-S-B HE»P LEACH
ESSE-SPOON-SCHP2
KOPPLIN.H. 363
MABEL NEW
WC LEAN 1 + 2
RYAN
1 1 (-< * T U J *
LOVE MINING co.
JOHNSON, JAMES
RADIATION EXPL C
RADIATION EXPL C
ADAMS, JOHM
GARZA "IMNfi CO.
KC ARTHUR STOCK
RADIATION EXPL C
RADIATION EXPL f
CITIES SERVICE
CONOCO- PIONEER
SUSOUEKA'-NA fc'EST
SUSOUEH»N-NA WEST
CONOCO-PJONEEP
CONOCO- PIONEER
SUSQUFHANNA WEST
CONOCO- PIONEER
CONOCO- PIONEER
SUSQUEH6NNA »EST
CONOCO-PIPNEF.P
CONOCO PIONEER
CONOCO PIONEER
CQNOCO-PIOHEER
CONOCO-PIONEER
CONOCO-PIONEEP
CQNOCO-PIONEER
CONOCO-PIONEEP
CONOCO-PIPNEER
susQUFHiNHA »F:ST
CONOCO- PIONEER
coNnco-PioNEtR
CONOCO-PIONEER
CONOCO-PIONEER
SUSOUEHANNA fEST
DALCQ-U S STEEL
CONOCO-PIOMEER
CONOCO PIONEER
WYOMING MINERALS
CONOCO-PIONEER
EXXON CO USA
CONOCO-PIONEEP
RRISCOE
PURNEI
CROSBY
GARZA
GAPZA
GAPZA
GAPZA
GARZA
GARZA
GONZALES
GOMZALFS
KARHES
KAHNES
KAPNES
KARNES
KARNES
KARNES
KAPNES
KARNFS
KARNES
KAR^ES
KAHNES
KARNES
KAPNES
KARNES
KARNES
KAPNES
KARNES
KAPNF.S
KARNES
K»PNES
KAP'.ES
KAPNES
KARNES
LIVE OAK
LIVE OftK
LIVE OAK
LIVE OAK
LIVE OAK
LIVE OAK
LIVK OAK
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
o
o
o
o
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
'SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
IN-SITU
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
UNKNOWN
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
IN-SITU
HL-ORES
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
100
100
100
100
>10 0,000
1,000 -
1,000 -
1,000 -
MOO, 000
1,000 -
>100,000
1,000 -
1,000 -
1,000 -
MOO, 000
1,000 -
1,000 -
MOO, 000
MOO, 000
MOO, 000
1,000 -
MOO, 000
1,000 -
MOO, 000
MOO, 000
MOO, 000
MOO, 000
1,000
1,000 -
MOO, 000
MOO, 000
1,000 -
MOO, 000
1,000 -
<100
<100
- 1,000
<100
<100
<100
<100
- 1,000
- 1,000
- 1,000
100,000
100,000
100,000
100,000
100,000
100,000
100,000
100,000
100,000
100,000
100,000
100,000
<100
loo, ooo
100,000
100,000
0
50
50
50
0
50
50
SO
SO
0
100
50
100
100
100
50
150
100
200
iso
200
200
100
50
100
150
0
50
100
ISO
150
400
200
SO
0
0
200
150
100
50
50
**»*** UTAH
BEEHIVE 5
C D P
DAISY
»«*«**«*»*«**»*»*
ATKINSON EXPL.CO BFAVER
C»RTER+D*LTON»PO BEAVER
STAATS + LOUDER BEAVER
UNDERGRO
UNDCRGRO
UNDERGRO
<100
<100
100 - 1,000
50
50
100
-------
INACTIVE URANIUM MINES IN THE UNITED STATES
80URCEI DOE, GRAND JUNCTION, COLORADO
PAGE 44
MINE NAME
CONTROLLER NAME
COUNTY
SEC. TOWNSHIP
RANGE MERID.
MINING
METHOD
TOTAL PRODUCTION
(TONS A3 OF 01/01/79)
DEPTH
CTT.)
*»**»»* UTAH
GEYSER BASIN
IRON QUEEN
LITTLE SISTERS
MERCURY SEC i«
MYSTEKY S1IFFER
PRODUCER
VILLARD GROUP
BLUE SKY 1
KEG
OH HEMPY t
RAIKRDW RIDGE GR
12A
4-CORNERS AREA D
A.+G.l
A.E.C. INCLINE
A.E.C.13
A.E.C.6*8
A.E.C.7
ACEITE 2
ADDIT 2
APEX S
BAKER INCLINE
BEAR CLAW
BIG CHIEF f>
BIG FLAT 1
BIG ROCK
BIRTHDAY
BLACK ROCK 1
BLANCO
BLOCK C
BLOCK G
BLUE BELL 2
BLUE BUTTE
BLUE BUTTE 1
BLUE GOOSE
BLUE JAY 1
BLUEBIRD
BLUEBIRD
BRIDGE 2-12
BUCKHORN
BUCKSKIN 2
BULL 1
BUZZARDS ROOST
CAMP BIRD GROUP
CANARY GROUP
CAT BIRD
CECILIAITE 1
CEDAR NIK SEC J6
(CQNT'D) »««»«»»«
GEYSER BASIN UPA
C + H "ING,
GRAEFF, RUSSELL
GARRICK,ELDRED »
MYSTERY SNIFFER
ATKINSON EXPL.CO
DREV.ES, VERNON
GRAHAM, FREO H.
PEED. G.B.
ACADEMY URANIUM
PARRISH+DALGLEI
tiPIGHT, L.B,
ATLAS MINERALS
ALBRECHT BROS.UP
CONSOLIOATFD URA
CONSOLIDATED URA
UNION CARPIDE CP
CONSOLIDATED URA
CONSOLIDATED WON
CONSOLIDATED URA
WOODWARD, O.W,
UNION CARBIDE CP
PAChlDE » CHIDES
BRACE,PEED
HUNT, RED
URAMI US INC.
KILCOX, BERT L.
FOOTE L.S.
STONE, E.F.,
PLATEAU URANIUM
CONSOLIDATED UPA
FAP«SWORTH,EMERS
DAVIS + NIELSON
ADAMS,R.D.»L.*,
A3IMUS, C.C.
JENSEN » KOURIS
HUNT, KAY
HAYES H.+ M.
HArfSEN, HO»ER
KAI*STEAUX,HARVE
FAUCETT + JONES
VALLEY MINING CO
HAMILTON J.C.
UNION CARHIDE CP
LITTLE KILD HORS
WILLIAMS MINERAL
ACERSON,ALFRED 0
R HENDERSON
BEAVER
BEAVER
BEAVER
REAVER
BEAVER
BEAVER
BOX ELPF.P.
DUCHESNE
DUCHESNE
DUCHESNE
DUCHESHE
EMERY
E"ERY<
EHEPY
EMERY
EMERY
EMERY
EMERY
ECERY
EMERY
EMERY
EMF.RY
EMERY
EMEOY
EMERY.
EVERY
EMERY
EMERY
EMERY
EMERY
EMERY
EMERY
EMF.RY
EMERY
EMERY
EMERY
EMFRY
EMERY
EMERY
EMERY
ECERY
EMERY
EMERY
EMERY
EMF.PY
EMERY
EMERY
EMERY
28
27 S
0
0
0
0
6.0 W
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
C
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
24
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
SURFACE
UNBERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
SURFACE
UNOERGRC
DUMPS
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNOERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UMDERGRO
SURFACE
SURFACE
UNOERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
SURFACE
1,000 -
100
1,000 -
100
100
MOO, 000
1,000 -
J,000
1,000 -
100
100
100
100
1,000 -
too
100
100
<100
<100
<100
<100
100,000
- 1,000
<100
<100
<100
<100
<100
<100
100,000
- 1,000
- 1,000
<100
<100
100,000
100,000
<100
100,000
<100
<100
<100
<100
- 1,000
<100
<100
<100
<100
<100
-------
INACTIVE URANIUM MINES IN THE UNITED STATES
SOURCEl OOE, GRAND JUNCTION, COLORADO
PAGE 41
CINE NAME
CONTROLLER NAME
COUNTY
SEC. TOXNSHIP
RANGE MERID.
MINING
METHOD
TOTAL PRODUCTION
(TONS AS OF 01/01/79)
DEPTrt
(FT.)
*********** UTAH
CEDAR RIDGE 2
CHEPIE 1,2*3
CISTERN 1 * 2
CLirr DWELLER i
CONRAD
CONSOLIDATED
CONTROVERSY 1
COPPER HEAD
COTTONWOOD 1
COUGAR 2
CROSSPO-i
CROV»
D,*R. CLAIMS
DALTON BROS 2
DARLENE 1-20
DELTA DUMP
DESERT "OC'V
DESOLATION
DIXIE JOYCE
DOLLY
DONITE GROUP
DRILL 2
EAGLF-R1TTLESHIP
EAGLES NEST
ELMER E CASPER
FANTASTIC
FISHER
FLINTYPt 2
GREAT BASIK
GREEN DRAGON
GREEN VEI'.'
GREEN VEIN 2
GREEN VEIN 5
GREF.N VIE-1 4
HARD CLIMBING 10
HAPDLUCK
HERTZ 1
HIDDEN POTN'T
INCL 6 DUMPS
INCLINE 10
INCLINE 11
INCLINE 12
INCLINE 11
INCLINE 14 » 15
INCLINE 16
INCLINE 17
INCLINE 16
INCLINE 19
(CONT'DJ »»»»»
CEDAR RIDGE URAN EMERY
KRUGER. RICHARD EKEPY
ENERGY FUELS NUC EMERY
CHEtTLE, E.V. Kiff.fi
CONRAD URAN.INC EMERY
ELLIOTT, JA«ES 0 EMERY
HO'aARD^ BPUCE EMF.RY
BEHUNIN, JOANNE EMERY
NOYES, FRED EMERY
RAIKPOol I'RANIUM EMERY
CHLLUM, CARROL F.MEPY
HAMILTON J.C. EMERY
CONTIN.UPAN.WYO. EMEPY
OALTON RRtlS. EMERY
ACERSOM,ALFRED 0 EMERY
PRES9PEY, G. M. EMERY
PETRO 1UCLEAR E.MEPY
LA", GLEN A. El'FRY
L1NDOUIST, JOE EMERY
ELLIOTT, JAMES 0 EM.ERY
ACEPSON,ALFRED 0 EMERY
INLAND RESOURCE* E«EHY
OUTWE5T UKANtOIL EMECY
HEATH, VII.FOPO EMERY
CASPER,CAPLTON P EMFRY
JErfKES » COVEY EMERY
HAMILTON j.c. EMERY
STEtL, l.F. EMERY
U.S.URANIUM CORP EMERY
ALBPECHT PROS.UP EMERY
BRYCIN, ELOON EMERY
JENSEN,WALTER K. EMERY
ENERGY FUFLS NUC EMERY
CAPITOL PEEF UPA EMERY
PETITTI, JOHM J. EMERY
DALE DILLON EMERY
DONALD HANNI EMERY'
CH1DESTER, JOE EMERY
PETRO NUCLEAR EMERY
PETPO NUCLEAR EMERY
ATLAS MINFRALS EMERY
PETPO NUCLEAR EMERY
PETPO NUCLEAR EMERY
PETRO NUCLEAR EMERY
PETRO NUCLEAR EMERY
PETRO NUCLEAR EMERY
FOUR CORNERS OIL EMERY
FOUR CORNERS OIL EMERY
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
SURFACE
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDCRGRO
DUMPS
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
SURFACE
UNOERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
USOERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
DUMPS
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
<100
<100
1,000 - 100,000
<100
1,000 - 100,000
1,000 - 100,000
1,000 - 100,000
<100
<100
<100
1,000 - 100,000
<100
<100
<100
<100
1,000 - 100,000
100 - 1,000
<100
<100
<100
100 - 1,000
<100
too - 1,000
<100
<100
<1-00
<100
<100
<100
100 1,000
<100
100 - 1,000
too - 1,000
100 - 1,000
<100
100 - 1,000
1,000 - 100,000
<100
1,000 - 100,000
100 - 1,000
100 - 1,000
1,000 - 100,000
100 - 1,000
1,000 - 100,000
100 - 1,000
1,000 - 100,000
100 1,000
100 - 1,000
0
100
100
0
100
0
0
0
. so
ISO
50
0
0
0
50
0
50
0
0
0
200
0
150
0
50
0
0
100
too
150
0
0
100
100
0
0
100
0
200
so
150
so
too
50
100
50
0
100*
I
-pi
en
-------
INACTIVE URANIUM MINES IN THE UNITED STATES
SOURCEl DOE, CPAND JUNCTION, COLORADO
PAGE 46
MINE MAKE
CONTROLLED NAME
COUNTY
SEC. TOWNSHIP
RANGE MERID.
MINING
METHOD
TOTAL PRODUCTION
(TONS AS OK 01/01/79)
DEPTH
(FT,)
*»»*»***** UTAH
INCLINE 2-V.ED.BE
INCLINE 20
INCLINE 21
INCLINE 22
INCLINE 3
INCLINE 4*5
INCLINE 7-MINE 7
INCLINE S+DINOSA
INCLINE 9 NORTH
INCLINE 9(FY
PETRO HUCl.tAR EMERY
PETPO NUCIEAR EMERY
ATLAS MINERALS EMERY
ATLAS MNRIS. E"ERY
ATLAS MINERALS EMERY
CONSOLIDATED URA EKERY
JOHNSO'l+JOHNSQN EMERY
JOSHUA MINING CO E*ERY
U NEVA UPAN.CORP EMERY
LAST CHANCE UNO EMERY
WRIGHT, WAYNE S. EMEPY
UNION CAPBIOE CP E"E<
-------
INACTIVE URANIUM MINES IN IHr UNITED STATES
«OURCE» DDE, GRAND JUNCTION. COLORADO
PAGE 47
MINE NAME
*»**«***»* UTAH
CONTROLLER NAME
COUNTY
SEC. IO«INSHIP
(CONT'D) **»«
XUDDY i
MUDDY 8
MUDDY RIVER
NO. 2
NORMA JOE
NORTH K.ESA i
NORTH MfcSA 12
NORTH MKSA n
NORTH MESA 6
NORTH MESA 9
NORTH KOU'iTAIN 2
NORTH SLOPE GROU
NORTH STAR
PACIFIC VENTURES
PAY DAY
PEARCE + KELLKY
POSSIBILITY 1
RABBIT 1
RAINY DAY
RED 1,2+5
RED BONE 10
RED PQNF 5
BED P-ONE 9
RED EUTTf; 1-q
RED CLIFF 3
RED FACF
RED POP-IN
RED SEEPS
REX 1
RYAN 11
SAHARA it
SC.SF.C.3f-18S-10
SCH SEC 2
SCH, SEC. 2*16
SOUTH TEMPLE
SOUTHERN CPOSS
8QUIRPFL
STILSON 5
TEMPLE 1
TOTEM POLE 1
TOUGH LUC< 1
TWIN PtAKS
UNION GCLf 3
UNKNOWN
VAN bEPG 2
VANADIIJV KING 4 +
VARIOUS
VEXTUPF
CIM"APON K'NG,
HUNTER L.T,
HUNTF.R L.T.
FRANDSEN, LAVERN
JOHNSON MELVIN C
UNION CARBIDE CP
CONSOLIDATED URA
CONSOLIDATED URA
CONSOLIDATED URA
UNION CARBIDE CP
k'lLKERSOM, THOMAS
JACKSON, LEO D,
HAYS, MONTY
BAY *EST INC.
AGAARD.ELMEP R.A
FOUR CORNERS OIL
HEATH, KILFOPD
GALAGCR+PICCRUCC
GPEEN FORK MNG,
PEIRO NUCLEAR
VITRO WINFRALS
WELCH "INING CO
PETRO NUCLEAR
APA"S URANH"" CO
xJNPEP, *«LLACK
.KNIGHT, HYRUM
fcEATH, wurosn
MOAH USANTUH co.
UNIO'I CAOPIDE CP
fAYN'APO * PYAN
E"f:PGY FUELS NUC
RAM MINING CO
ACKRSON, ALFRED 0
ASIMUS, C.C.
SK1DMORE, T.H.
KINN, JOKN
GPAXLICH MINERAL
STILSON, DOYLE
CONSOLIDATED URA
BABBLE, GORDON
CONSOLIOATF.D URA
WINN, JOH^
TrfOMAS, HARVEY
NUCLEAR MINES IN
KNIGHT, N.P.,
ROPI»'SON, CL»IN
COr'SOLIDATFR URA
GPEFN HOR^FT «NG
EMERY
EMERY
CMERY
EMEPY
EMERY
EMERY
F.MERY
EMERY
CKEPY
EMERY
EVERY
E"ERY
FhERY
EMERY
EMSPY
CMEPY
EMERY
CM.FRY
r«tRY
EMEPY
KVEPY
E»ERY
EMFRY
E"?PY
E"F"Y
f.^r.Vi
EMEPY
EMFHY
F«h.RY
E'TPY
F.MEPY
EMERY
EMERY
EMERY
EMERY
EMERY
EMCPY
EMEPY
EMEPY
IMFRY
EMERY
EMERY
EMEPY
E«ERY
E«EPY
E«FRY
E^ERY
E""F.BY
RANGE MERID.
n
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
n
o
n
o
o
n
0
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
MINING
METHOD
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGPO,
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRQ
UNDERGRO
UNDERGKO
UNDERGRO
UNpERGRO
UNDERGkO
SURFACE,
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
UNOErfGSO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNOt:PGRO
SURFACE
UNOCRGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
UNPERGRO
SURFACE
UNOERCRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGHO
SURFACE
TOTAL PRODUCTION
INS AS OF 01/01/79)
100
100
1,000 -
1,000 -
100
1,000 -
100
100
100
1,000 -
100
1,000
1,00'J -
1,000 -
100
100
too
1,000 -
1,000 -
- 1,000
- 1,000
<100
<100
<100
100,000
<100
<100
<100
100,000
<100
- 1,000
<100
100,000
- 1,000
<100
0
<100
100,000
<100
100,000
<100
- i,noo
<100
<100
<100
<100
<100
<100
<100
<100
<100
- 1,000
<100
- 1,000
100,000
100,000
<100
DEPTH
(FT.)
100
0
0
0
0
150
0
0
0
50
300
0
0
0
too
0
0
0
250
250
loo
too
150
too
0
50
0
0
0
0
250
100
100
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
100
0
0
0
too
100
-------
INACTIVE URANIUM MINES IN THF UNITED STATES
SOURCE! DOE, GRAND JUNCTION, COLORADO
PAGE 41
MINE NAME
»»»«»*«# UTAH
VIRGINIA VALLEY
VITRO DUMP
WEDDING BFLL
WHITE STAB 1-10
WICKIUP
WILD HORSE 22,77
WILDCAT
WILLOW SPRINGS
WINDY
AGATE GROUP
ALLEN 3
B + M CLAI* 1
BEAR CANYON
BETTY JACK
BIG TREE
BLACK CAT 2
BLACK MOUNTAIN
BLACK WIDOW
BLITZ.,
BLUE BIRD
BLUE PIRD 4
BLUE" GOOSE
BR01N TOP
BUFF
BULL 4
BUST 2
BUTTLAR KASH t
CARPON 1
CEDAR POriT 2
CIRCLE CLIFFS
COFFEE ROYAL 1 +
CONGRESS 14
CONGRESS 22
CONGRESS 2*
CONGRESS 25
CONGRESS 47
CONGRESS 47+48*5
CONGRESS S3
CROW-LUCKY SI.ATE
DEAN 4
DEEP CANYON 1
DEEP CANYON 2
DENNEA LOU
DIRTY SHAME 7
DOMS 1
DREAM
DREAM CLAIM 1
DUKE MIKE
CONTROLLER NAME
COUNTY
SEC. TOWNSHIP
(COt.'T'D) ...
LAW, GLEN A.
VITRO CHEMICAL
H.M.W. MINERALS
B + B MINING CO,
ARAGUK, A.B.
CISTERN MINING
JENSEN + JACKSON
W1KTERS + JONES
BLACK DRAGON URA
UNITED ENERGY
KAISER URAN.CO.
HEIMECKE PROS.
FEDERAL RESOURCE
UNIVERSAL URAN.C
20TH CEITUHY POW
f.C ELROY, JOHN
HOLMES, J.rtARK
ENERGY FUFLS NUC
ACME URAMU« MNG
RAINBOW UPANIUM
BLUE GOOSE MNG
DAVIDSON, FMERY L
CHRISTEl;SF.N,ARKI
WRIGHT, K.K.
HUNT, RF.O
SMITH * STEWART
EKKER, HAROLD C.
SILVF.P BELL INDli
COOPEF + BROWN
BPOrlN,A.P.+ASSOC
BULLDOG MINING C
GUTHRIE + ASSOC.
GUTHRIE + ASSOC.
GUTHRIE » ASSOC.
GENERAL UTILTIES
EKKER, HAROLD C.
INDUSTRIES+MINES
SMITH, C.C.
GENERAL UTILTIES
EKKER, HAROLD c.
EKKER, HAROLD C.
HERCULES URANIUM
DIRTY SHAKE MNG
EKKER, P.ITTEP
BROHN * SONS co
DREAM MINING co
FRANDSEN BROS.
F.MERY
F.MERY
EMERY
ChERY
E«ERY
EMERY
EMERY
EMERY
EMERY
GARFIELD
GAPFIELD
GAHFIELD
GARFIELD
GAPFIELD
GARFIELD
GARFIELD
GAHFIELO
GAPFIELD
GARFIELD
GARFIELD
GARFIELD
GAPFIELD
GARFIELO
GAPFIEI.D-
GAPFIELD
CAPFIELD
GARFIEl.D
GARFIELD
GAPFIELR
CARFIELD
GARFIELD
GARFIELD
GARFIELD
GARFIELD
GA«FIELD
GARFIELD
GARFIELD
GARFIELP
CARFIELD
GAPFIELD
GARFIELD
GARFIELD
GARFIELD
GARFICLD
GARFIELD
GARFIELD
GARFIELD
GARFIELD
RANGE KERID,
0
o
0
0
o
o
o
o
0
(I
0
0
o
o
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
n
0
0
. 0
0
0
0
MINING
METHOD
SURFACE
DUMPS
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
UNDERGPO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERQRO
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDCRGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
SURFACE
ro
is
1
i
1
TAL PRODUCTION
AS OF 01/01/79)
100 - 1,000
100 > 1,000
,000 - 100,000
100 - 1,000
<100
100 - 1,000
<100
<100
<100
,000 - 100,000
<100
-------
INACTIVE URANIUM MINES IN THE UNITED STATES
SOURCE I DOE, GRAND JUNCTION, COLORADO
PAGE 49
MINE NAME
CONTROLLER NAME
COUNT*
SEC. TOWNSHIP
RANGE: MERID.
MINING
METHOD
TOTAL PRODUCTION
(TONS AS OF 01/01/79)
DEPTH
CTT.)
«»»«*»*» UTAH
EAGLE GPOUF
EAST COVE 9
EDNA GROUP
ELLEN 1
ELLSWORTH i
ELORA 1
ELSWORTH 1
CRMA MAE 1 * 2
EUNICE 1
FIVE STAP GROUP
FREMONT ASSOC 1
GAPFIELD
GENERAL
H.+H.3-5+15
HAN5EN A
HARD ROCK
HARD SCRABBLE 1
HENRY 12
HENRY MOUNTAINS
HOPE
HOPE-CIRCLE CLIF
HOT SHOT+HT.SHT.
JAKE
JIM OASPY
JUNE BELL GROUP
KING GPC1UP
LAST CHANCE 1
LITTLE SHE
LODE
LONE *,
LONE-EAGLE 1-9
LOUISE 1
LUCKY DAY
LUCKY STRIKE 1-7
LUCKY STRIKE 10,
LUCKY STRIKE 8 »
LUCKY STP1I 1,000
<100
100 - 1,000
100 - 1,000
1,000 100,000
<100
<100
<100
<100
too - 1,000
<100
<100
1,000 - 100,000
1,000 100,000
1,000 * 100,000
<100
100 1,000
<100
<100
100 - 1,000
<100
<100
<100
100 - 1,000
<100
<100
100 - 1,000
2SO
too
150
100
100
50
50
50
50
100
200
200
so
50
100
150
ISO
100
so
200
50
100
so
50
50
50
150
50
50
50
100
100
100
100
300
ISO
50
150
50
100
50
too
50
so
too
50
so
50
-------
INACTIVE URANIUM MINES IN THE UNITED STATES
SOURCEl DOE, GRAND JUNCTION, COLORADO
PACE 50
MINE
CONTROLLER NAME
COUNTY
SEC. TOWNSHIP
RANGE MERID,
MINING
METHOD
TOTAL PRODUCTION
(TONS AS OF 01/01/79)
DEPTH
(FT.)
****»*** UTAH
OIL SEEP 8
PENNELL 11
PHYLLIS
OUEEN OF SHEBA
RAINY DtY
RATS NFST
RATTLESNAKE
FED CLIFF
RENE BOB
ROARING ATOM
ROBBERS ROOST
POSE AN'. 1
ROSILASD 2
ROY DEL GROUP
PUBILEE 2
S.Y.36
SALINA 2
SEC.36-32S-ME
SEC.6-32S-UE(T-
SHOOTF.PINC 1 + 2
SILVER FALLS
SILVER LEAF
SILVER RO^ GROU
SPRING C»*YON
STRAIGHT CREEK
SUNRISE 1-6
SYLVIA 2-14
TENDERFOOT
TRACKYTE 12
TRACKYTE 17,16+1
TRACKYTE 9 10
TRAIL CANYON 1
TRU AHN GROUP
TUNMSQf-
VA LEAR
WALTER GROUP
WAP PAINT 1
WEST BANK
WHITE BULL GROUP
WILLIE i
WOODRUFF GROUP
YELLOW CAT 1-3
YELLOW JACKET
YELLOh PAINT
3 RS 5
A GROUP
AEC GROUP
AUOUA
(CONT'O)
EKKER, HAROLD C.
HUNT, REO
EKKER, PITTER
JENSEN, WFSLSY
ACME URANIUM MNC,
PROSPECTORS,INC.
DAVIS, PAY
TANNER,RUTHERFOP
SEVEY, JANES
JOHNSOX + ROSS
JENSEN f-C MINING
ARMSTRONG,LYLE C
EKKER + SANDERS
FEDERAL RESOURCE
ARCO URANIUM CO
GtlTHRIE + ASSOC.
MATHJS, R.G.
SHELCO, INC.
P+P ASSCC
U NEVA UR1N.COPP
HINDS, FRED
HINDS, FRFD
SELF, fcRRCL
EKKER, HORACE
ENERGY FUELS NUC
S.+ A,MINING CO.
CPF.Eti F>+ KING J
HIJLFN, BRADLEY
MILl.ARD GARDNER
DENNIS EKKEP
CHESTMJT + HARTLf.Y
IKKER, HQPACE
PROSPECTORS,INC.
ACME URANIUM MNG
HUNT, KAY
DAY, ORSON
WALLACE, LYM-AN
P.OGF.RS, R.S.
TYRtE,CHAS.H.EST
URAMU" SERVICE
ENERGY FUELS NUC
NOVELLE, F.D.
BARNEY + HOWARD
ATLAS-AMAX
BALSLEY, TOM
URANIUM PROD CO
SUTHEPLAND*SUTH
HARRIS MINING CO
GAPFIELD
GAPFIELD
GAPFIELD
GARF1ELD
GARF'IELD
GARFIKLO
GARF1ELD
GARFIELD
GAPFIELD
GAPFILLD
GARFIELD
GARFIELD
GAPFIELD
GAPFIF.LO
GARFIELD
GARFIELD
GARFIELD
GAPFirLD
GAPFIELO
GAPMELD
GAPFIF.LD
GARFIELO
GARFIFLD
GARFIELC
GARFIELD
GARFIELD
GARFIELO
GARFIELn
GAPFIEI.D
GAPFIELD
GARFIELD
GARFIELD
GARFIELD
GARFIELD
GARFIELD
GARFIELO
GARFIELD
GAPFIELD
GAPFIELD
GARFIELD
GARFIELD
GAPFIELO
GARFIELD
GRAND
GRAND
GRAND
GRAND
12
26 S
23 S
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
n
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
17.0 C 24
0
17.0 E 24
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UND.ERGRO
SURFACE
SURFACE
UNUERCRO
UNOERGRO
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGXO
UNDERGRO
UNPERCRO
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
UfiDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRQ
SURFACE
-UNDERGRO
SURFACE
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
SURFACE
100
1,000
100
100
100
100
1,000 -
100
too
100
100
100
100
100
100
1,000 -
<100
- 1,000
<100
*100
100,000
<100
- 1 ,000
<100
<100
<100
<100
<100
<100
-------
INACTIVE UPAMUM HIKES IN THt UNITED STATES
SOURCEl DOE, GRAND JUNCTION, COLORADO
PAGE SI
MINE NAPE
#»»»*»*» UTAH
AVIS-HORN
BARE SPOT
BF.AR POINT
BEPTHA » FALCON
RIG BUCK 17
BIG LOUIE 1
BLACK APE 1 + 2
BLUE BOY
BLUE CHIEF
CLUE CHIEF
BOBBY 1
BRUMLEY BASIN 1
6UCKHOBN 1
BULL CANYON GROU
C D WHEELER CLA1
CAPTAIN JACK
CAPTAIN JINKS
CEDAR POI»iT 2
CIE DOG
CLEANUP MJTERUL
CONSTELLATION 1
COPPER 2 8
CORRAL DU«P
COTTOVinoo 6
COUNTER 1
DAN ICE
DILLERS 1 + }
DIME
DIME
DISCOVERY
DRAGON FLY 4
EDNA 3
EFFIE F.
END OF TRAIL
F.w. 3
FALCON 1
FLAT TOP
FOOLS LUCK
FOSTER AREA
FREEDA 2
FRKEPORT
GAP
GEICEP 1
GLADSTONE
GLORY HOir.
GREAT DANE 1
GREEN LIZAPD i
GREEN TREE
CONTROLLER NAME
COUNTY
SEC. TO*NSHIP
CCO^T'D) »*»**«#**
UNION CARBIDE CP GRAND
SWARTZ,HAROLD H GRAND
LILC. GLEN GRAND
CLINE + CO. GRAND
LAHMERT+BUPGESS GRAND
AMCAN GRAND
TERRA MARINE MNG GRAND
HAMRICK, F.ARL GRAND
NICHOLS, CARL A. GRAND
COWGER »'.R. GRAND
CIRCLE DOT INC. GRAND
STRATEGIC "NRLS GRAND
COLVIN +BPESNAHA GRAND
ADAIR, IVOR GRAND
BLACK ROCK UBAN. GRAND
UNION CARBIDE CP GRAND
UNION CARRIDE CP GRAND
FOSTER, LEONA GRAND
CO^ANCriE UPAN.CO GRAHD
LANCE HAPDMAN GR»"JO
SECPE5T, ART 0, GRAND
K.* J.MINING CO. GRAf-'D
THOPNBUHG MNG. GRAND
URANIUM PPOD CO GRAND
ABERNATHY, JESS GRAND
UNKNOWN CONTROLR GRAND
GOLD CLtlUD URAN GRAND
HC NEIL + HUGHES GRAND
STOCKS, JCHN GRAND
MERSAB CO. GRAND
GREAT WESTERN UR GRAND
COLUMBIA URAN.CO GPAND
UNION CARBIDE CP GRAND
BLACK. CAT EXPL.C GRAND
UNION CARBIDE CP GP0ND
HASLEY, JACK GRAND
WILSON, R.P. GRAND
SHARTZ,HAROLD H GRAND
UNION CARBIDE CP GRAND
MONARCH URANIUM GRIND
UNION CARBIDE CP GRAND
MOODS, DUKE B, GRAND
EMERSON EL +ASSO GRAND
UTAH ALLOY ORES GRAND
ORADO MINING GRAND
ABRAHAH80N, J.F, GRAND
SMITH + LIKES GRAND
MCGEHEE, t, GRAND
1
5
29
34
21
7
3
4
26
33
29
12
11
25
26
24
24
15
34
10
35
27
25
10
34
9
1
24
25 S
23 S
25 S
23 S
26 S
24 S
23 S
23 S
26 S
24 S
24 S
22 S
23 S
25 S
25 S
25 S
24 S
24 S
26 S
25 S
24 S
S S
24 S
23 S
22 S
23 S
24 S
27 S
25 S
23 S
PAMGE
25.0 E
21.0 E
25.0 F.
20,0 ;
17.0 E
26.0 F.
22.0 F
0
0
0
0
0
25.0 E
20.0 K
0
25.0 T.
0
2*,0 E
20.0 E
0
21.0 E
20.0 E
0
17.5 F
0
17.0 E
0
20,0 r.
20.0 E
0
1B.O E
17.5 E
25.0 E
91.0 V
25.0 F
20.0 t
22.0 E
21.0 E
25.0 E
23.0 F
25,0 E
0
0
0
24.0 E
0
0
0
MERID,
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
2«
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
MINIMS
METHOD
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
'UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
KISC.-PB
SURFACE
SURFACE
DUMPS
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGPO
TOTAL PRODUCTION
(TONS AS OF 01/01/79)
DEPTH
(FT.)
1,000 "
100
100
1,000 -
1,000
100
1,000 -
1,000 -
1,000 -
1,000 -
100
100
100
1,000 -
1,000 -
100
1,000 -
100
100,000
<100
1,000
- 1,000
<100
100,000
100,000
<100
<100
<100
<100
<100
<100
- 1,000
<100
100,000
-------
INACTIVE UPANIUM MiNEf. IN 7HF. UNITED STATES
SOURCEl DOE, GRAND JUNCTION, COLORADO
MINE NAME
CONTROLLER NAME
COUNTY
SEC. XQKNSHIP
RANGE MERIO.
MINING
METHOD
TOTAL PRODUCTION
BALCONES EXPL.DR
ZUEEELT C.+ P.
JIM TWITCHELL
DE ROSS, ROSE HAP
GRAMLICH MINERAL
IRVINE, DON J.
UNIVERSAL URAN.C
ATLAS MINERALS
SUNSET MINES INC
V.* L.OEVFLOPME*
UNKNOfcV COMTROLP
DAVIS, LEON L.
BARTON, C.S.
HOAR URANIUM CO,
PETPQ NUCLEAR
A8ERNATHY, JESS
KNIGHT, N.B. JR
LE*JS, J.w,
MINERAL HILL URA
UNION CARBIDE CP
TONY PENE
JONES, E.N.
WEAVER, CARL
FOSTER + WAREHAM
CATO, CHARLES
BRQUM * DARROWS
SUTHEPLAND+SUTH
AIRBORNt PRSPCTR
DEVELOPS CO.
PENE, ANTHONY JR
BEHUNIN, JOANNE
INDUSTRIES+MINES
JERRY STOCKS
SHUKWAY + WESTWO
ATLAS-AMAX
GRAND
GRAND
GRAND
GRAND
KNIGHT, N.B.
LEE MORRIS
UNION CARBIDE CP
THORNBURG URAN V
JENSEN * KOURIS
WRIGHT, L.P.
TURNER BROS
AP.ERNATHY, JESS
CATO, CHARLES
UNION CARBIDE CP
UTAH ALLOY ORES
UTAH ALLOY ORES
GPAND
GRAND
GPAND
GRAND
GRAND
GRAND
GPAND
GRAND
GRAND
GRAND
GRAND
GPAND
GPAMD
GRAND
GRAND
GRAND
GPAND
GRAND
GRAND
GRAND
GRAND
GRAND
GRAND
GRAn'D
GRAND
GPAND
GRAND
GRAND
GRAND
GRAND
GRAND
GRAND
GRAND
GRAND
GRAND
GRAND
GRAND
GRAND
GRAND
GRAND
GRAND
GRAND
21
12
16
4
22
10
1
53
26
15
26
6
28
7
32
27
15
35
26 S
29 S
25 S
22 S
26 S
2 S
25 S
23 S
23 S
22 S
25 S
24 S
22 S
24 S
23 S
26 S
26 S
26 5
26 S
24 S
26 S
25 S
1 24 S
6 23 S
6 23 S
20.0
21.0
17.0
14.0
0
0
17.0
14.0
0
17.5
21.0
0
21.0
0
22.0
0
20.0
0
0
24.0
22.0
0
0
26.0
0
0
22.0
20.0
18. 0
0
0
20.0
0
18.0
25.0
0
24.0
0
25.0
0
0
0
0
0
0
25.0
22.0
22.0
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
r.
i
K
E
E
E
E
E
E
K.
E
E
E
E
E
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDEKGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRf]
SURFACE
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
SURFACE
UNDEPGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
U-NDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
100
1,000 -
100
1,000 -
1,000 -
too
100
100
1,000 -
100
1,000 -
100
100
1,000 -
100
100
100
-
100
100
- 1,000
<100
100,000
- 1,000
<100
<100
<100
100,000
<100
<100
100,000
<100
. <100
<100
- 1,000
<100
- 1,000
<100
<100
- 1,000
100,000
<100
<100
<100
<100
- 1,000
<100
100,000
- 1,000
<100
<100
- 1,000
100,000
<100
<100
1,000
<100
- 1,000
- 1,000
<100
<100
<100
<100
<100
<100
1,000
1,000
<100
200
0
50
50
0
0
150
0
0
0
200
0
0
50
50
50
0
0
0
0
50
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
50
0
0
0
50
0
400
100
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
50
0
I
en
-------
INACTIVE URANIUM MINES IN THE UNITED STATES
SOURCEl DOC, GRAND JUNCTION, COLORADO
PACE 53
MINE NAME
***«***«** UTAH
PET.TREE 7+8
PCT.TREF.-ELVA M.
PETERSON PROPER!
PETRIFIED TREE 2
PETRIFIED TREE 9
PINE TREE 1
PINTO JACK
PITTSBURG
POLAR KING
POND + SHUBERI
PROSPECT 1
PROSPECT 2
PROSPECT 4
PROSPECT 7
PROSPECT 9
PROSPECTOR
OUESTA 3
RANCH VIE"
RED HEAD 2
RED OXIDE 1 + 2
RED TOP 3
FED VANADIUK GRO
RIBBON RIDGE
RIMROCK
RIVER VIE*
ROCKET JR.GROUP
RUBE
RUSTY BUCKET
RUTH 1
S.R.FRACTION
SADDLE
SAND FLAT
8C.SEC.36(PNGTAI
SCH SEC. 2
SEC.2,73S-2iE
SEC.32.22S-22E
SHINARUHP 1
SHINARUHP 1,1A,3
SILVER MOON
SLICK ROCK
SNOW FLAKE 1
SOCKO 2
SQUAW PARK GROUP
SUE + RUTH
SORE FIFE
TEATON 2
THOMAS B,
THOMPSON C.
CONTROLLER NAME
COUNTY
SEC, TOWNSHIP
(CONT'D) »»»»»»
UNION CARBIDE CP GRAND
UNION CARBIDE CP GRAND
UNKNOWN CONTHOLR GRAND
UNION CARBIDE CP GRAND
UNION CARPIDE CP GRA10
IRVINE, DM J. GRAND
UNION CARBIDE CP GRAND
UNION CARBIDE CP GPA^D
UMIOV CARBIDE CP GRAND
UNKNOWN GRAND
HETZEL, LFE GRAND
HARBISON, JAMES I. GRAND
BOOMERANG MINING GRAND
WIEMAN, 5.W. - GRAND
HC FARLAND, BOB GRAND
MONTGOMERY, JACK GPA'ID
BUSEY, L.E. GRAND
YOSEMITE l>RA«,CO GRAND
SMUPE, IKE H. GRAND
CATO, CHARLES GRAND
CALLAH4N. JAY GRAND
UNIOM CARBIDE CP GRAND
KEELF.,T.H*DALLAS GRAND
UNIOM CARBIDE CP GRAND
EVANS R.C. GRAND
ADAIR, IVOR GRAND
KEOGK, JOf"-' .GRAND
DETROMCS INC. GRAND
PAY DA* URAN CO GRAKD
UNION CARBIDE CP GRAND
ZIAK, PAUL GRIND
MIDLAND URANIUM GRAND
ATLAS MINERALS GRAND
STATE OF UTAH GRAND
UNION CARBIDE CP GRAND
HUFF, LILLIAN GRA.VO
POWER OIL CO. GRAND
PO*ER OIL CO. GRAND
UTAH ALLOY ORES GRAND
LILF., GLEN GRIND
SUThERLAND+SUTH GRAND
ATOMIC POWER URA GRAND
PENE 4 RUGGERI GRAND
SUNRAY MINING CO GRAND
MURPHY, OTTO GRAND
MANGER * JONES GRAND
UNION CARBIDE CP GRAND
UNION CARBIDE CP GRAND
27
34
27
35
20
10
2?
11
Id
18
1*
1R
18
18
24
22
4
26
26
12
26
24
36
2
32
11
28
11
4
34
34
24 S
24 S
24 S
24 S
19 S
25 S
24 S
25 S
25 S
25 S
25 S
25 S
25 S
25 S
23 S
24 S
23 S
22 S
24 S
25 S
23 S
24 S
23 S
22 S
23 S
22 S
23 S
23 S
47 N
23 S
24 S
24 S
RANGE
25.0 E
25.0 E
0
25.0 E
25.0 E
19.0 E
25.0 E
25.0 E
25.0 E
26.0 E
25.0 E
26.0 E
26.0 f.
26.0 E
2S.O F
0
0
24.0 F.
23.0 E
23.0 E
0
23.0 E
0
25.0 F.
0
1R.O F
21.0 e
0
0
25.0 E
0
24.0 *
?1.0 E
0
21.0 T.
22.0 E
0
0
21.0 E
20.0 E
0
20.0 H
23.0 E
0
0
0
25.0 E
25.0 E
MERID.
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
2<
24
22
24
24
24
MINING
METHOD
UNOERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDEriGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
TOTAL PRODUCTION
(TONS AS OF 01/01/79)
DEPTH
(FT.)
1,000 - 100,000
1,000 - 100,000
<100
1,000 100,000
1,000 - 100,000
<100
<100
100 - 1,000
1,000 100,000
1,000 - 100,000
<100
1,000 - 100,000
<100
<100
<100
<100
<100
<100
<100
<100
<100
1,000 100,000
<100
1,000 - 100,000
<100
100 - 1,000
<100
-------
INACTIVE URANIUM MINES IN THE UNITED STATES
SOURCEl DOE, GRAND JUNCTION, COLORADO
PAGE 54
MIKE NAME
*«»**» UTAH
THORN
THREE JAY 19
TOBY GROUP
TURTLE
TWIN BUTTE
UTAH ST.LSE. 573
VALLEY VIEW
VIRGIN MARY t
VIVIAN + NEK VIV
"ASP
WEOO 1-10
WINDY PHINT
Y.ELLOrf GRASS ROD
YELLOW HORSE
YELLOU JACK
YELLOW ROAD
YELLOW VANADIUM
YIP YIP
DESERT VIEW
BELL HILL
CARNOTITT KI'iG
EAGLE ROCK
YELLOW CHTFF
LYNN GROUP
RADIANCE
YOUNG 1
BUDDY
CLOYS MINE
EAST SLOPE:
FAP«EP JOMN
FREEDOM GROUP
JOG
LUCKYSTRIKE ANNE
POTTS FRACTION
PROSPECTOR
VEGA CLAIMS
D + RGW PR PCPCR Y
A FAULT THERE WA
ABC 11
ABE 8
ACE
AJAX
ANETH 1
ANN
ANN
ASH
AVALANCHE 13
AVALANCHE 9
CONTROLLER NAME
(CONT'D)
GARDNER L.L.
JONFS. LEO W,
DOYLE H,K.
HERI^ETHEP,JAMES
LEXIS, C.L.
STATE .D
GRAND
GRAND
GRAND
SEC. TOWNSHIP
GRASD
IRON
JUAB
JUA8
JUAH
JUAW
KA^E
KANE
KANE
PIUTF
PIUTE
PIUTE
PU'TE
PIUTE
PIUTE
PIUTE
PIUTE
PIUTE
SALT LAKE
SAN JUAN
SAN JU»"J
SAN JUAN
SAN JUAN
SAN JUAN
SAN JUAN
SAH JUAN
RAN JUAW
SAN JUAN
SAN JUAN
SAN JUAN
31
32
1R
13
3
35
31
35
16
4
4
4
4
4
26
4
15
11
22 S
J2 S
26 S
23 S
25 S
22 S
12 S
17 S
40 S
27 N
27 N
27 S
27 S
27 &
26 S
27 S
37 S
30 S
23.0 E
0
0
0
0
25.0 E
24.0 E
21.0 E
25.0 E
0
0
22.0 E
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
12,0 W
12.0 K
9.0 »
0
0
3.0 w
3.0 Vi
0
3,0 k
3,0 W
0
3.0 W
.4,0 W
3.0 *
0
0
0
0
0
21,0 E
0
0
0
24.0 E
0
0
0
!RID.
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
MINING
METHOD
SURFACE
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNOERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGR3
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRQ
UNDERGRO
UNDEKGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDEKGRO
MISC.-PB
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNOERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNOERGRO
UNDERGRO
TOTAL PRODUCTION
(TONS AS OF 01/01/79)
1,000 -
100
100
too
100
MOO, 000
100
100
1,000 -
1,000 -
1,000 -
MOO, 000
1,000 -
1,000 -
100
1,000 -
1,000 -
100
100
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000 -
<100
<100
<100
<100
<100
<100
100,000
<100
- 1,000
<100
<100
<100
-------
URAMIUM MINES IN THE UNITED STATES
SOURCE! DOE, GRAND JUNCTION, COLORADO
PACE 55
MINE NAME
CONTROLLER VAME COUNTY
B + I
t VEE
BACARDI CUTLER
BADGER HOLF.
BALSEY
BASIN GPO'JP
BEF.
BELL HIKE
BENCH 1,2,3 » 4
BETTY GRTUP
BIG BEN t
BIG BLUFF
BIG 8Q«L
BIG PUCK
BIG BUCK 11
BIG BUC* 7
BIT, 8UC». 7.8*6»
BIG BUCK. 4A(BRUK
BIG BUCK9,OA,10,
BIG CREEK
BIG INDIAN J
BIG MIKE 1
BIG KONKFY
BIG SADDLE 1
BIG TREE
BILL 5
BILLY JOE ».HEELE
BIRTHDAY
BLACK »CE ?
BLACK BOTTOM
BLACK CATS 1-10
BLACK HAT
BLACK OXIDE
HLACK HITER
BLACKSTPf.E DUMPS
BLO SVAKE
BLOCK 42
RLUE BELL
BLUE BIPD
BLUE 8I»0 1
BLUE BONKET
BLUE BUTTE 1
BLUE CLAY
BLUE GOOSE
BLUE HILL
BLUE JAY
BLUE JAY 3
BLUE JAY DUMPS
(CONT'Dj ***********
WHITE CANYON MNG SAN JUAN
HILL H.K.
ATLAS MINERALS
UNKKQ«iN CONTROLS
UNKNOWN CONTROLR
SHUMrfAY BPOS."G
ATOMIC RESOURCES
BARLOW + SITTON
MCDONALD+PATRSOM
ELK RIPGE MINING
FLECK, SAMUEL
S.+ R.xIKFS
PITTMAN, EMIT
BAILEY, WALLACE
ATLAS MINERALS
ATLAS MINERALS
ATLAS MINERALS
ATL«S OIKKPALS
ATL*S MINERALS
BAILEY, WALLACE
UTAH COLORAnO DF
LAMC.EPT, JAMES R
OHTHMAN, i»ILLI4f
MISSOURI SXPL.CO
AKIN BROS.
>iIGHT, BILL
BLACK ROCK URAN.
FOOTE MINERALS
LYE«-S, W.F.
SHIPROCK.LTD
MAX»ELL,MELVIN L
GEO-ENEPGY RES
ABC EXPLORATION
NAVAJO TRJBF
EXCALTBUR IND.
TID»ELL,CHUDE E
PLATEAU MNC-..CQ,
HALIfl, OkES
HARBISON, JAMES L
UNKNOWN CONTROLR
PRESLEY + TANNER
UNKNOWN COKTROLR
PICKENS, CHARLES
BALSLEY + WRIGHT
JOHNSON, CUANE
BALSLEY, H.tf.
RUST+BAIPD»PIECE
6IERSCHIEO+SWISH
SAN JUA'J
S»N JUAN
SAN JUAN
S»N JUAN
S»N JUA.J
SAN JUAN
SAN JUAN
SAN JUAN
SAN JUAM
SAS JUAV
SAK JUAJ
Si*. JUAJ.
SAN JUAN
SAN JUAM
SAN JU1M
SAN JUA-J
SAN JU4N
54'' JUAN
SAN JUAN
SAN JUAN
S4N JUAN
S»N JUAN
SA« JUAN
SAN JUAN
SAN JUAN
SAN JUAN
SAN JMAN
S»N JUAN
SAN JUAfl
SAN JUAN
SAN JUAN
SAN JUAN
SAN JUiN
SAN JUAN
SAN JUArl
SAN J'JAi
SA" JUAM
SAN JUAN
S»N JUAN
SAN JUAN
SAN JiHN
SAN JUAN
SAN JUAM
SAN JUAN
SAN JUAN
SAN JUAN
SAN JUAN
9
31
II
11
11
10
19
28
29 S
37 S
31 S
37 S
37 S
27 S
30 S
30 S
30 S
37 S
31 S
28 S
15
36
26
20
27 S
27 S
28 S
37 S
PANGE
0
0
28,0 E
0
0
21 ,0 r
25.0 f
17.0 E
0
0
0
25.0 r.
23.0 F
0
0
24.0 F
24.0 E
0
24.0 T
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
21.0 r.
0
25.0 E
0
26.0 E
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
23.0 E
22.0 r
23.0 E
25.0 F
0
MCRID.
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
MINING
HETHQD
UNDERGRO
UNDEKGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDEXGRO
UHDERGRO
SURFACE
SUPF4CE
SURFACE
UNDERGPO
UNDEHGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDEHGRO
UNDERCRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNPERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGPO
UNDESGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
DUMPS
SURFACE
UNOERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDEHGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERCRO
DUMPS
TOTAL PRODUCTION
(TONS AS OF 01/01/7
1,000 - 100,000
<100
MOO, 000
<100
<100
1,000 - 100,000
100 - LOOP
100 - 1,000
1,000 - 100,000
1,000 - 100,000
<100
<100
<100
1,000 100,000
100 - 1,000
<100
1,000 - 100,000
1,000 - 100,000
>100,noo
<100
<100
<100
<100
<100
<100
<100
<100
1,000 100,000
<100
100 . 1,000
<100
1,000 - 100,000
100 - 1,000
1,000 - 100,000
1,000 - 100,000
<100
<100
<100
<100
100 - 1,000
<100
<100
1,000 - 100,000
100 - 1,000
<100
1, 000 > 100, 000
<100
1,000 100,000
DEPTH
(FT.)
150
100
550
0
0
100
so
100
200
250
0
0
0
0
400
0
100
100
500
0
150
0
50
0
0
300
0
0
0
0
200
200
200
50
100
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Ul
en
-------
INACTIVE URANIUM MINES IN THE UNITED STATUS
SOURCEl DOE, GRAND JUNCTION, COLORADO
PACE 56
MINE NAME
CONTROLLER NAME
COUNT*
SEC, TOWNSHIP
RANGE MERID.
MINING
METHOD
TOTAL PRODUCTION
(TONS AS OF 01/01/79)
DEPTH
(FT.)
«».».» UTAH
BLUE LIZZARD
BOBCAT
BOJO
BONANZA 1 * 2
BONNIE LEE
BOUNDER
BOW
BOWLEGS
BOX CANYON
BRADFORD 1-5
BREEZY GPOUP
BRIGHT STAP
BROKE* SHOE
BROWNIE 1
BUB
BUCK 3
BUCK SKIN 1*2
BUCKEYE NO 1
8UCKHOPW
BUCKHORN 1-8
BUCKSKIN 1-2
BUCKSKTr, ROBBY
8UCKSK.tr. STAIN
PUD 1
BUSTER
PUTLEP CANYON
BUTTE 1
C GROUP
C.C.C.
CALICO
CAMEL (CIGARETTE
CANARY
CANARY
CANDY
CANYON 1
CANYON 2
CARL,LOOK,PAYDAY
CAROL B
CARTER 2
CABKIN 3
CEDAP
CEDAR 37
CEDAR BIPD
CEDAR INCLINE
CHAMP 1
CHARLES KEITH
CHARLEY 3
CHESS RIDGE
(CONT'D) »»*«
ENERGY FUELS NUC
UNKNOWN CONTRLR'
BOJO URANIUM CO.
BALSLEY, H.W,
BOJO URAMUM CO.
PETERSON, FRANK
INSPIRATION LEAD
ATLAS MINERALS
FOOTE MINERALS
DEVILS CANYON UR
STOCKS+LAMBERT
LEWIS, C.L.
DANVERS, DON
URANIUM CENTER C
SHUMWAY BOB
BIGHORN GOLD CLO
ALBERT BALLARD
XEGNER W.J,
UTOMIC EXP.+ MNG
BUCKHORN MINING
JIM MINBOURN
UNKNOWN CONTROLR
SHIPROCK.tTO
BALDWIN,ROBERT D
NICHOLS+SUTYAK+
UNKNOWN CPNTROLR
SHU1«IAY SETH
AIRBORNE PRSPCTR
DELAY SHUKhAY
RANCHERS FXPL+D
BABBELS UPJN.ENG
BADGEP UPAN.CORP
ABERNATHY, JESS
REDP*BASINERE ME
BARBER MINING CO
COL TEX URANIUC.
NIELSOS, FRANCIS
OURAY URANIUM
MORGAN,CHARLES C
8HUM4AY + ViESTKO
ZIAK, PAUL
YUBA DEVELOP,CO.
BRADFORD,SYLVEST
YUBA DEVELOP.CO.
CHAMP MINING CO
NAVAJO TRIBE
WHITE CANYON MNG
SHUMWAY PETE
SAN JUAN
SAN JUAN
SAN JUAN
SAN JUAN
SAN JUAN
SAN JUA^
SAP JUAN
SAN JUAN
SAN JUAN
SAN JUAN
SAN JUVM
S»" JUAN
SAd JUAN
SAN JUAN-
SAN JUAN
SAN JUAN
SAN JUAM
SAN JUAN
SAN JUAS
SAN JUAN-
SAN JUAN
SAN JUAN
SAN JUAN
SAN JUAN
SAN JUAN
SAN JUAN
SAN JUAV
SAN JUAN-
SAN JUAN
SAN JUAN
SA" JUAN
SAN JUAN
AAN JUAN
SAN JUA4
SAN JUAS
SAN JUAN
SAN JUAN
SAN JUAN
SAN JUAN
SAN JUAN
SAN JUAN
SAN JUAN
SAN JUAN
SAN JUAN
SAN JUAN
SAN JUAN
SAN JUAN
SAN JUAN
11 30 S
27 31 S
33 29 S
14 36 S
33 29 S
23 37 S
29 51 N
29 27 S
18 36 S
19 27 S
3 28 S
9 37 S
7 27 S
0
24.0 E
0
24.0 E
0
0
0
24.0 E
0
0
0
24.0 E
26.0 E
0
0
0
0
0
24.0 t
0
0
0
0
18.0 w
23.0 E
0
0
0
0
0
0
26.0 E
24.0 E
0
0
0
,0
23.0 E
0
0
0
0
21.0 E
0
0
0
0
24.0 E
UNDERGRO
24 UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
24 UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
24 UNOERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNKN.OWN
UNDERGRO
24 UNDERGRO
24 SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGPO
SURFACE
24 SURFACE
SURFACE
UNKNOWN
UNOERGRO
UNOERGRO
22 UNOERGRO
24 UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERCRO
24 SURFACE
24 UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGPO
24 UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
24 UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
24 UNDERGRO
1,000
1,000 -
too
100
MOO, 000
1,000 -
100
100
100
100
100
1,000 -
1,000 -
too
1,000 -'
100
too
1,000 -
1,000 -
100,000
100,000
- 1,000
- 1,000
<100
<100
<100
100,000
- 1,000
- 1,000
<100
<100
<100
<100
- 1,000
1,000
<100
<100
<100
<100
<100
<100
<100
<100
<100
- 1,000
100,000
-------
INACTIVE URANIUM MINES IN THE UNITED STATES
SOURCCl DOE, GRAND JUNCTION, COLORADO
PAGE 57
HINE NAME
*****»***» UTAH
CHIPMONK
CLAIM 22
CLAIM 4
CLAIM 6
CLIFF HOUSE
CLIMAX 2
COAL CREEK
COLUMBIA 1
CONCENTRATE
CONGLOMERATE 2
COPPER TOP 5
CQSTANZA
COTTONWQOO
COTTON*OOn
COTTONHOOO 1
COTTONKOOD 2
COTTONWOOD 2+3
COTTONWOOD 3
COTTONWOOO 4
COTTONWOOD TAILI
COUGAR
COVE GPnup
COYOTE 1
CUTLER
CYS MONUMENT
DAISY 2 -
DARK HORSE
DELAWARE CHIFF I
DEVIL 3
DEVIL CANYON i
DIABLO
DIMS
DIP GROUP
DISMONT SLICES
DISSIPATION
DIVIDE-YELLOW JC
DIXIE 2
DOLLAR
DOROTHY 2
DOROTHY "AY
DRY HOLF(«L 35)
DUGWAY
DUSTY
E.TAYLOR CANYON
EAGLE NEST
EARLY DA*N
EARLY MORN
EAST BANK
CONTROLLER NAME
COUNTY
SEC. TOWNSHIP
(CONT'D) #»«
BROPHY + YACKEL
DALPEZ+MORTISON
UNKNOWN COMTPOLR
STANDARD METALS
UNION CARPIDE CP
ATLAS MINFPALS
SITTON t DULANEY
ATLAS MINERALS
C.O.G.MINERALS
INTERMOUNTAIN UR
BRIGHT, L.B.
PIONEER DRLG.CO,
BALSLEY, H.W.
UNKNOWN CONTROLR
DENTOK F.J.
BLACK, CALVIN
SHUM*AY*HOLLIDAY
SLACK,C.»JONES 1C
HARVEY BELLUM
BLANDUG MINES C
INDUSTRIAL URA.V.
C.O.G.MINERALS
BURDETT SHU««IAY
CLIFF MINING co.
ENERGY FUFLS NUC
JIM C. BUTT
DAVIS, HD"ER
GIBRALTAR URAN.C
CROSS, ODPIE V.
JiUPST^UINTON R.
'CPA*FORD-H*RIGHT
SHUMWAY+ DADE
MINERAL HILL URA
ATOMIC RESOURCES
HOMESTAKE MNG CO
RED ROCK DEV C
SURPLUS URANIUM
C.8.S.URANIUM CO
BARRY, ROBERT
ATLAS MINERALS
COTTONWOOD MNG,
FOOTE MINF.RALS
ALONGO, E.J.
DELHI URAN + OIL
MOAB URANIUM CO.
STOCKS, H5R,
STOCKS, H.P.
SKUMWAV BPOS.MC
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SA'I
SAN-
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN-
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
S&N
SAN
SAN
JUAN
JUAN
JUAN
JUAN
JUAN
JUAN
JUAN
JUAN
JUAN
JUAV
JUA<
JUAN
JUAN
JUAN
JUAN
JUAM
JUAX
JUAN
JUAN
JUA1
JUA*
JUAN
JUAN
JUAN-
JUAN
JUAN
JUA1
JUAN
JUA*
JUAN
JUAN
JUAN
JUAN
JUAN
JUAN
JUAN
JUAN
JUAN-
JUAN
JUAN
JUKI
JUAN
JUAN
JUAN
JUAN
JUAN
JUAN-
JUAN
15
15
33
35
3
4
4
35
7
26
35
19
26
13
4
3
27 S
36 S
29 S
31 S
30 S
37 S
37 S
37 S
35 S
31 S
29 S
30 S
37 S
36 S
30 S
37 S
37 S
RANGE
23.0 E
0
0
0
25.0 E
0
0
24.0 E
0
21.0 E
0
25.0 E
0
0
0
21.0 E
21.0 E
0
21.0 E
0
0
0
24.0 F.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
25.0 E
0
0
24.0 E
25.0 T.
25.0 E
24.0 t
0
24.0 E
21.0 E
0
0
0
0
0
0
28.0 E
MERID.
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
2<
MINING
METHOD
SURFACE
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNOERGRO
UNDERGRO
LOnGRADE
SURFACE
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
MISC.-PB
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO"
UND.ERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
- UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
TOTAL PRODUCTION
(TONS AS or 01/01/79)
DEPTH
(FT.)
<100
<100
100 - 1,000
<100
100 - 1,000
1,000 100,000
<100
1,000 - 100,000
1,000 - 100,000
<100
<100
1,000 - 100,000
ino - 1,000
1,000 - 100,000
too - 1,000
1,000 100,000
1,000 100,000
1,000 - 100,000
1,000 100,000
1,000 100,000
<100
1,000 100,000
<100
100 1,000
1,000 100,000
1,000 - 100,000
<100
<100
<100
<100
<100
1,000 - 100,000
100 - 1,000
<100
1,000 - 100,000
1,000 - 100,000
<100
<100
<100
MOO, 000
1,000 100,000
100 - 1,000
100 - 1,000
100 - 1,000
<100
<100
100 - 1,000
5^000 JOO.OOO
0
100
50
0
50
so
0
700
0
0
300
100
0
0
100
0
100
100
100
50
100
250
50
50
100
200
0
250
250
0
250
50
SO
0
500
150
150
250
100
400
100
SO
50
SO
100
0
0
0
-------
INACTIVE URANIUM MINES IN THE UNITED STATES
SOURCEl DOE, GRAND JUNCTION, COLORADO
PAGE 51
MINE
CONTROLLER NAM£
COUNT*
SEC. TOrfNSHIP
»**«*» UTAH
EAST RIM
EAST WOODEN SHOK
ELLA
F.LMORE 1
EVA
EXPECTATION
F.D.R.9
r. i.GROUP
FAIR DAY
FALL
FAULT t
FIREFLY
FIRST+LAST CHANC
FORK VIEW
FOUND
FOUND
FOXY DAN
FRACTION
FRACTION CLAIM
FRANCE
FRIDAY
FRUNDELL t
FRY-E.COMMAND
C.n. l
GARY
G4YLENE 2
OILMAN * OILMAN
GILPAN
GIVEAWAY
GIZMO GROUP
GLAOE 11
GOLD CROWN
GOOD HOPE
GRAND VIEW
GRASS ROOT
GRf.EN + GREEN
GRKEN FLY 1
GREEN ROCK
GRF.Y DA>.'N
H.BLACKWATER 2+3
HALF + HALF
HANGOVER
HAPPY JACK
HAPPY SURPRISE 1
HARD ROCK
HART DRAW
HATCHET 3
HATTIE
(CONT'D) >**»**»
BLEAK, FLOYD
SETH SHUMWAY
KASHPURN.LARK
PRESLEY + TANNER
UNION CARPIDE
ATLAS MINERALS
NEILSON, P.J,
HILLSBORO URAN
JONES + SIMPSON
MERIT URAN,CORP,
ABBOT, DAVID
GEO-ENEPGY RES
WRIGHT, L.R.
RANDOLPH +DILLON
FOOTE MINERALS
WHITE CANYOV MNG
WIUBOl'RN, JAfcES
OURAY URANIUM
SHUMtfAY + DAVIS
EDGEL, MAX W,
BROhN, ALBERT J,
UNKNOWN CnnTROLR
TANNER * TANGREE
DENBY + FFRANDO
SHUPE BROS
AMALGAMATED URAN
SHUMXIAY + DADE
FOOTE MINERALS
JIM C, BUTT
6LAKE. OON'ALD V.
NUGENT, CLAUDE E
NAVAJO,TRIBE
DAY, ABE
SLUE CHIEF URAN
NAZER, ORSON
ELK M,TN.URA".COR
LAUGHTER, GERALD
WEGNCRtVESELIK+H
KASHSUPN.LAPK
NAVAJO TRIBE
JOHNSON, DAVE
C.SHUKWAY
8RUNKE, U.K.
HAPPY SURPRISE M
GOODWIN, PAY
CLIFF MINING CO.
TURNER + TIDWELL
KURPHY, VICTOR
SAN JUAN
SAN JUAN
SAN JUAN
SAN JUAN
SAN JUAN
SAN JUAN
SAN JUAN
SAN JUAN
SAN JUAN
KAN JUAN
SAN JUAN
SAN JUAN
SAN JUAK
SAN JUAN
SAN JUAN
AAN JUAN
SAM JUAN
SAN JUAN
SAN JUAN
SAN JUAN
SAN JUAN
SAN JUAN
SAN JUAN
SAN JUAN
SAN JU»N
SAN JUAN
SAN JUAN
SAN JUAN
SAN JUAN
SAN JUAN-
SAN JUAN
SAN JUAN
SAN JUAN
SAN JUAN
SAN JUAN
SAN JUAN
SAN JUAN
SAN JUAN
SAN JUAN
SAN JUAN
SAN JUAN
SAN JUAN
SAN JUAN
SAN JUAN
SAN JUAN
SAN JUAN
SAN JUAN
SAN JUAN
2ft 28
13 47
3 30
30 29
2 28
9 37
6 31
7 31
27" 2B
13 31
30 39
15 37
13 32
S
N
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
RANGE
0
0
2«,0 E
0
20.0 V
24,0 E
0
0
0
0
0
26.0 E
0
0
0
0
0
23.0 E
0
0
0
24.0 E
0
0
0
0
25.0 f
0
0
0
0
0
25.0 E
0
23.0 E
0
24.0 t
0
26.0 E
0
0
21.0 E
23.0 E
0
0
0
0
0
MERID. MINING
METHOD
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
24 UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
22 UNDERGRO
24 UNDERGRO
CNDERGRO
UNDERCRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
24 UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
24 UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
24 UNDERGRO
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE'
SURFACE
24 UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNOERGRO
UNDEWGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
24 UNDERGRO
SURFACE
24 SURFACE
SURFACE
24 UNDERGRO
SURFACE
24 UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
24 UNDERGRO
24 UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
TOTAL PRODUCTION
(TONS AS OF 01/01/79)
DEPTH
(FT.)
too - 1,000
100 - 1,000
1,000 » 100,000
<100
1,000 - 100,000
MOO, 000
<100
<100
<100
<100
1,000 - 100,000
1,000 - 100,000
<100
<100
1,000 100,000
1,000 - 100,000
<100
100 - 1,000
-------
INACTIVE URANIUM MINES IN THE UNITED STATES
SOURCEl DOE, GRAND JUNCTION. COLORADO
PAGE 59
MINE NAME
CONTROLLER NAME
COUNTY
SEC. TOWNSHIP RANGE MERID.
MINING
HETHOO
TOTAL PRODUCTION
(TONS AS OF 01/01/79)
DEPTH
f
JUAN
JUAN
JUAN
JUAN
JUAN
JU»«
JUA'I
JUAN
JUAN
JUAN
JUAN
JUAN
JUAN
JUAN
JUA»K
JUAN
JUAN
JUAN
JUAV
JUA1*
JUAN
JUAN
JUAN
JUAN
JUAN
JUAN
JUAN
JUAN
JUAN
JUAN
JUAN
JUAN
JUAN
JUAN
JUAN
JUAN
JUAN
JUAN
IS 37
3 37
^ 32
25 28
34 29
10 33
28 28
11 32
3 29
10 37
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
21.0 E
24.0 E
0
0
0
0
21.0 r
0
0
25.0 t
24.0 E
0
0
22.0 E
0
0
n
0
0
0
0
0
26.0 r
0
0
0
0
23.0 E
0
0
0
0
23.0 E
21.0 E
0
0
0
UNDERGRO
UNDERGPO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SUHFACE
UNDERGRO
BNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
24 UNDERGRO
24 UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
SURFACE
24 UNDERGRO
USDEPGRO
SURFACE
24 UNDERGRO
24 UNDEHGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGPO
24 UNDERGR0-
SURFACE
U^DERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDEKGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
SURFACE
24 UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNOERGRO
SURFACE
UNOERGRO
24 UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDEPGRO
UNOERCRO
SURFACE
24 UNPERGRO
24 SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGPO
SURFACE
<100
>100,000
100 - 1,000
100 - 1,000
<100
>100,000
,<100
loo - 1,000
<100
<100
100 - 1,000
100 - 1,000
<100
100 - 1,000
<100
<100
<100
1,000 - 100,000
100 - 1,000
<100
<100
>ioo,ooo
<100
<100
1,000 - 100,000
<100
<100
-------
INACTIVE URANIUM HINES IN THE UNITED STATES
SOURCEl DOE, GRAND JUNCTION, COLORADO
PACE 60
MINE NAME
CONTROLLER NAME COUNT*
SEC. TOWNSHIP RANGE MERID.
MINING
METHOD
TOTAL PRODUCTION
(TONS AS Of 01/01/79)
DEPTH
(FT.)
UTAH
(CONT'D) »..»«.«.«»»
KNOB
LA LOHA 2
LAST CHANCE 1
LAST CHANCE 1
LAST CHANCE 3
LAVENDER 5
LEASE 3226
LEASE 3<>19
LEDGE
LENA 16
LF.NA 20
LENA 4
LEO J,
LIBERTY
LINOA MUJAR
LITTLE DA.N
LITTLE DEVIL
LITTLE niAS 3
LITTLE DOROTHY
LITTLE FA*iN
LITTLE INDIAN
LITTLE JACK
LITTLF PETFP
LIZAPD
LONE BUTTE
LONE PI^E
LONE STAR
LONE -VOLF
LONESOME 5 + 6
LONG HOLE
LOST BOY+IOST RP
LOST INDIAK 1
LOUISF
LOYA RAY
LUCKY *OY i
LUCKY DAY 2
LUC*Y LADY
LUCKY STRIKE
LUCKY STRIKE
LUCKY STPIKE 1 »
LUCKY STPIKE 2
LULU I
KABLE DEE
MACHINE REJECTS
MAMIE
MARCY GROUP
REDD, PRESTON
BAILEY, P..D.
ATLAS UPAMUM CO
ALCO URANIUM
SHUPE, WADE
FROST, ALFRED
STATE OF UTAH
STATE OF UTAH
ELLISON V>.
TUPNKR BROS
TURNER BROS
KELLEY, JAKE S.
J.+ J. URANIUM
ERHST, HAROLD
ATLAS MINERALS
STOCKS, DONALD
BO»'LES » HEFLIN
LONE BUTTF, «NG.
UNKNOWN CONTROL?
NICHOLS, CARL L.
SITTON F A
8UIGLEY. FRANK
MSHBl'RN,L»9K
CLEVELAND, J.G.
UNKNOWN CONTPOLP
NOONAN RAtPrf
DYEP, DELBEPT
BAILEY +SFILSON
WARD, ",o.
STOCKS, CLAYTON
RUST, GLEN
BARBEP NIMNG CO
DO100,000
1,000 - 100,000
100 - 1,000
ISO
100
150
150
ISO
0
100
0
0
0
0
0
150
too
so
0
0
50
0
0
0
100
150
0
0
150
0
0
0
150
0
250
0
550
50
300
0
150
0
too
0
150
100
450
0
400
200
150
I
CT>
O
-------
INACTIVE URANIUM MINES IN THE UNITED STATES
SOURCEl DOE, GRAND JUNCTION, COLORADO
PACE 61
NINE NAME
******* UTAH
CONTROLLER NAME
COUNTY
SEC. TOWNSHIP
(CONT'D) ***»*»
MARY JANE 7
MAXINE
MAXINE 2
MAXINE j
MAY6E MINE
MESA
MEXICAN HAT STOC
MI COPAZOV
M1DVALE
MILL
MINERAL to
KIRADOR-HOR1Y TO
MITTEN i
HOE i
MOKI i
MOLLIE.UT.5T. 56
MONTEZU»A
MONTEZUVA 1
MONUMENT 3
MOONLIGHT 1,2 + 3
NAP
NEW AL ROGERS
NIPPLES
NONE SUCH-RIG LE
NORTH MKSA
NORTH POI«T 6
NOPTH PT.-GONEA*
OKIE
OLD PO'XDER
PAGODA
PANDA
PASCO,JEN, JACKIE
PAY DAY
PAY orr
PAYDAY-CLOUDY DA
PEACH A 1
PEARL
PEAVINF OUEEN
PEGGY
PETE GROUP
PETERING
PHILLIP DEE 1
PICKALO PETE
PIGMY
PINCH
PINE TREE
PIUTE
POINT
SMITH,RICHARD F.
HARBISON,JAMES
TRANS WESTERN UP
TRANS WESTERN UR
NEILSON, MILTON
GOOD EARTH MNG.
NAVAJO TRIBE
ATLAS MINERALS
SHUMWAY+ DADE
R + J MIXING
SHUMWAY + WES'
ELAM J.D.
NAVAJO TRIBE
BLAKE, DONALD V.
MOKI MNG CO
STATE OF UTAH
BLACK THUNDER.
BLACK THUNDER
BUTT, H.D.
SECURITY IJRA + OIL
TERRELL + BLACK
K.T.+ G,MNG.CO.
TORRES, DAVID
FOOTE MINERALS
NICHOL-ADAIR+BP
VHITE CANYON
YUBA DEVELOP.CO.
A*8 MINING CO
HELMAN, MATT+DA
EAST BASIIJ OIL
HURST, BOB
ATLAS MINERALS
QUIGLEY, FRANK
NESTWOOD +
ENERGY FUELS NUC
RICHEY, LEE
ATLAS MINERALS
KIMMERLE, HOWARD
SHUPE, WADE
CANYONLANDS URAV
6HUM.WAY PETK
NAVAJO TRIBE
BLEAK URANIUM CO
STERNS * Z
UNKNOWN CONTROLS
PETE SHUMWAY
CONSOLIDATED URA
FOOTE MINERALS
F.
L
UR
UR
iN
MO
V.
01
01
IL
K
.
P
NG
0.
'A
+
TH
DC
RD
AV
CO
,OW
iLP.
FU
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
BAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SA»
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
JUAN
JUAN
JUAN
JUAN
JUAN
JUAN
JUAN
JUAN
JIJAM
JUAS
JUAN
JUAN
JUAN
JUAN
JUAN
JUAN
JUAN
JUAN
JUAN
JUAH
JUA1*
JUAN
JUAN
JUAN
JUAN
JUAN
JUAN
JUAN
JUAf
JUAN
JUAN
JUAN
JUAN
JUAN
JUAN
JUAN
JUAN
JUAN
JUAN
JUA"
JUAN
JUAN
JUAN
JUAN
JUAN
JUAN
JUAN
JUAN
25
1
26
13
35
26
1
IB
21
2
33
2
34
14
7
2B
30
28
4
31
37
43
31
36
36
27
31
31
35
22
29
33
36
30
36
28
28
2B
37
S
s
S
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
8
RANGE
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
24.0 E
24.0 E
0
0
15.0 E
0
21.0 E
0
24.0 F
0
25,0 E
0
0
23.0 F.
25.0 E
24.0 E
0
0
15.0 E
0
28.0 E
0
0
24.0 E
0
22.0 E
24.0 E
0
24.0 E
29.0 E
26.0 E
0
0
0
0
26.0 E
0
23.0 E
0
21.0 E
MERID,
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
MINING
METHOD
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
HISC.-PB
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGKO
UNDEHGftO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO.
UNDERGRO"
UNDERGRO
UNDERGKO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
U'MDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
TOTAL PRODUCTION
ONS AS OF 01/01/79)
<100
100 - 1,000
<100
<100
1,000 - 100,000
<100
100 - 1,000
1,000 - 100,000
1,000 - 100,000
100 - 1,000
<100
100 - 1,000
1,000 - 100,000
100 > 1,OUO
1,000 - 100,000
<100
100 - 1,000
100 - 1,000
<100
<100
1,000 - 100,000
<100
100 - 1,000
1,000 - 100,000
<100
100 - 1,000
1,000 - 100,000
1,000 - 100,000
<100
<100
100 - 1,000
MOO, 000
<100
loo - 1,000
1,000 - 100,000
100 - 1,000
MOO, 000
<100
<100
1,000 - 100,000
too » 1,000
100 - 1,000
-------
INACTIVE URANIUM MINES IN THE UNITED STATES
SOURCE! DOE, GRAND JUNCTION, COLORADO
PAGE 62
MINE NAPE
CONTROLLER NAME
COUNT*
SIC. TOWNSHIP
RANGE MERID.
MINING
METHOD
TOTAL PRODUCTION
CTONS AS Or 01/01/79)
DEPTH
» UT»n
POINT
POPEYE
PORCUPINE
PORCUPINE 1
PRICE-LUCK
PRINCE ALBERT
PRODUCTION
PROFIT GRCUP
PURE LUCK
R.H.H.
P.O.METHLS
RADON HOT POCK G
PAINBOW
RAM 1
RAM GROUP '
RAM JET
RATTLESNKE * U
RATTLESNAKE PIT
RAVEN 1
REBEL
RECLAIMED OPE
RED BOX » REC HO
RED CANYON 1
RED DEVIL J + 2
RED HOT 1-36
RED HOTEL
RED PATCH
RED ROCK
RED POCK GROUP
RKDLANDS GPOUP
RENEGADE
RENEGADE 1
REPRISE
PCX GROUPtCEKR F
REYNOLDS 1
RICHARDSON
RIDGE 1
RIM POCK
ROAN CREEK
ROBIN
ROCK 1 » 2
POCK DOOR 1
ROTTEN LOG
ROYAL FLUSH
PUBY
RUSTY 4
RUSTY CAN 5
RUSTY-LITTLE KAE
tCONT'D) *«»«*»
YU6A DEVELOP.CO,
JARA-4ILLO, THOS.
HARBISON,JAMES L
CHATU URAN.MNG,
SLAGTER EXPLORAT
SILVER EAGLE MNG
SKYLAND DEVEL.CO
ATLAS-AMAX
EDGAR CXPLORATIO
DEGURSE, JACK
APEX EXPLORATION
ATLAS MINERALS
SMITrl, in.I.
CIMOTA EXPLOFATI
LYLE PROS
WESTERN MINERALS
ATLAS MINERALS
^nODMONT INC
RADIO GEOPHYSICA
P J NOONAN
BLACK, CECIL
ERNST * DILLON
P.ED CANYON MINES
DURHAM, JASPER ft.
ALTURA MINING CO
UNKNOWN COHTROLR
SHUM4AY+ DAPF
NAVAJO TRIBE
OE-«TOH F.J.
"UPPKY, VICTOR
PETERSON, FRANK
KINERAL HILL UPA
ATLAS MINERALS
GRANT SHUMWAY
REYNOLDS,HORACE
HOPESTAKE MNG CO
SIMPSON,WOODROU
KASSEL URAN.ENTE
CONSOLIDATED URA
TURNER, FRED
BURBRIDGE, DEL
NAVAJO TRIBE
UNKNOWN CONTROLF
SHUMrfAY BROS.MG
5HUPE, WADE
TURNER URAN CORP
WRIGHT, L.B.
GENERAL ELECTRIC
SAN JUAN
SAN JUAN
SAN JUAN
SAN JUAN
SAN JUAN
SAN JUJS
SAN JUAN
SAN JUAN
SAN JUAN
SAN JUAM
SAN JUAN
SAN JUAN
SA«i JUAN-
SAN JUAN
SAN JUAN
SAN JU1N
S*N JUAN
SAN JUAN
SAN JUA«
8A» JUAN
SAN JUAN
SAN JUAN
6AN JUAN
SAN JUAH
SAN JUAN
SAN JUAN
SAN JUAN
SAN JUAN
SAN JUAN
SAV JUAN
SAN JUAN
SAN JUAN
SAN JUAN
SAN JUAN
SAN JUAN
SAN JUAN
SAN JUAN
SAN JUAN
SAN JUAN
SAN JUAN
SAN JUAN
SAN JUAN
SAN JUAN
SAN JUAN
SAN JUAN
SAN JUAN
SAN JUAN
SAN JUAN
4
7
16
30
35
29
12
9
14
14
3
28
IS
36
34
26
36 S
32 S
28 S
2B S
31 S
36 S
29 S
29 S
31 S
.27 S
27 S
30 S
29 S
37 S
27 S
35 S
36 S
16.0 E
23.0 F
23. 0 E
0
0
23.0 E
0
23.0 F
25.0 E
0
0
24.0 F
0
0
0
0'
0
21.0 E
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2S.O E
0
0
0
23.0 E
23.0 E
24.0 E
0
0
24,0 E
21. n E
0
0
22.0 F
24,0 E
0
0
0
0
0
25.o e
0
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
SURFACE
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDESGSO
UNDERGRO
UNDER6RO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDErtGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
MISC.-PB
UNDERGRO
UNUERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGHO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
100
100
1,000 -
100
MOO, 000
100
too
100
>100,000
1,000
100
1,000 -
100
1,000 -
1,000 -
MOO, 000
1,000 -
1,000 -
1,000 -
1,000 -
<100
<100
<100
<100
<100
- 1,000
- 1,000
100,000
- 1,000
<100
<100
- 1,000
- 1,000
<100
<100
- 1,000
<100
100,000
<100
<100
<100
<100
- 1,000
-------
INACTIVE URANIUM MINES IK THE UNITED STATES
SOURCCi DOE, GRAND JUNCTION, COLORADO
PACE 63
NINE NAME
»**»»* UTAH
SADDLE
SADDLE-SCENIC
SALT CEDAR
SALT CREEK 2
SAN JUAN 4
SAN JUAN SHAFT
SANDY
SC.SEC.16.27S-23
SCENIC
SCH SEC 1
5CH SEC. 36
SCH SEC 36 A
SCH. SEC. 16
SCH. SEC, 32
' SCH. SEC. 32
scH.SEC.uoes-?
SCH.SEC.16-395-2
SCH.SEC.36,305-2
8CK.SEC.34,435-1
SCHMITZ FOLLY
SCHOOL SECTION
SEBASTPOOL
SEC.36,2»S-24£ U
SEC.36.31S-24E
SELDOM
SERVICE
SERVICE BERRY
SHALE
SHALE BLOCK I +
SHINE
SHIRLEY 1
SIMPATICA 3
SIR SNAPPER
SKEETER
SKIP
SKUNKOVICh 1
SKUNKOVICH 2
SKYLINE
SLIDE
SLIDE-BIG THREE
SLUM
SHALL FRY 5+7
SOLOKAN E.-fMA
SOUTH ALICE
SOUTH ALHAR GROU
SOUTH NOTCH
SOUTH SLOPE
SOUTH WIND 1
CONTROLLER NAME
COUNTY
SEC. TOWNSHIP
(CQKT'D) »»««»««
WHITE CANYON MNG
YUBA DEVELOP.CO.
BARBER MINING CO
JONES BROS,MNG.
LINDA GAY MNG.
RANCHERS FXPL+D
KNAPP URAN.OEVEL
STATE OF UTAH
JIM BUTT
STATE OF UTAH
'STATE OF UTAH
STATE OF UTAH
LAMBERT +PALSLEY
STATE OF UTAH
STATE OF UTAH
BALSLEY, TOM
JIM BUTT
TPIOEM HIM CO
STATE OF UTAH
BADGER URAN.CORP
AMERICAN URAN EN
FERGUSON AV.+ CT
UNION CARBIDE
HOPKINS, ED
DELAY SHUMiAY
LY£N,POLLOCK*HUM
LYLE FRANCIS
8HU«vl»Y BRDS.MG
FOOTE MINERALS
SHUVWAY BPQS.MG
CRAIG MINING CO,
SHUMrfAY BROS.MG
NOLANr, FRANK
STOCKS, JOHN
BISHOP + DAVIS
ATLAS MINERALS
ATLAS MINERALS
NAVAJO TRIBE
8HUMHAY H + L
CHESS RIDGE UNO
MONTEZ1IMA URAN,
RANCHERS EXPL*D
TAT"AN+GILLE5PIE
HOKESTAKE KNG CO
ATLAS MINERALS
BERNSTEIN+CARTE
BENTLEY, JIM
DAKOTA MINING CO
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
JUAN
JUAN
JUAN
JUAN
JUAN
JUAN
JUAN
JUAN
JUAN
JUAN
JUAN
JOAN
JUAN
JUAN
JUAN
.1UAN
JUAN-
JUAN
JUAN
JUAN
JUAN
JUAN
JUAM
JUAN
JUAN
JUAV
JUAN
JUAN
JOA.V
JUAN
JUAM
JUAN
JUAN
JUAN
JUAN
JUAN
JUAN
JUAN
JUAN
JUAN
JUAN
JUAN
JUAN
JUAN
JUAN
JUAN
JUAN
JUAN
34
34
33
16
32
16
36
36
36
36
34
3
11
14
27
7
28
35
33
28
13
29 S
29 S
39 S
27 S
37 S
28 S
30 S
43 S
28 S
21 S
30 S
37 S
30 S
30 S
43 S
25 S
35 S
29 S
J9 S
29 8
31 S
RANGE
0
0
20.0 E
0
0
24.0 r.
21.0 E
23.0 E
0
0
0
0
0
0
23.0 E
23,0 E
0
25.0 E
14.0 E
0
0
0
24.0 E
24.0 E
0
0
25.0 E
21.0 E
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
24.0 E
24.0 E
15.0 t
0
24.0 F
24.0 E
24.0 E
0
24.0 E
24,0 E
0
24.0 E
0
KERID,
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
MINING
METHOD
UNDERGRO
UNDFRGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UN0EHGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNKNOWN
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERURO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERCRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
TOTAL PRODUCTION
(TONS AS OF 01/01/79)
DEPTH
err.)
100 - 1,000
100 1,000
100 - 1,000
-------
INACTIVE URANIUM MINES IN THE UNITED STATES
SOURCEl DOE, GRAND JUNCTION, COLORADO
PAGE <4
MINE
**»**«*»* UTAH
SPOOK-DEE
SPRING CPEEK
SPRING WATER GSO
SSL 2470
ST.LSC. 5691 UTA
STARLIGHT
STATE LINE
8TI«IKO
STONE LOG 1
SUNDAY 4
SUNDOWN
SUNOOwN
SUNNY DAY
SUNNYSIDE
SUNNYSIDE
SUNWISE
SUNRISE
SUNSET
SUNSHINE
SURPRISE
TAYLOR PEtD 1+2
It OUIERO
TERGIRA
TEXSTAR
TOP
TREASURE TROVE
TREE
UNIT 7
UNKNOWN
URACOP 1-3
URANIU" XING
UTAH ST.LSE 2291
UTAH ST.LSK. 235
UTAH ST.LSE, 5)0
UTAH ST.LSE. I7«,
UTAH ST.LSF.2333
VAL VISTA 1
VALLEY POINT
VALLEY VIE*.
VANADIUM QUEEN
VARIOUS
VARIOUS
VEDURE
VELDF.RS 1
VELVET
VICTOR
VIEW
VIEW NORTH 1
CONTROLLER NAME
(CONT'D)
CBC MINING CO.
rooTc MINERALS
SHUPWAY BPOS.MG
STATE OF UTAH
STATE Or UTAH
SHUPE, IKF «.
NEILSON, MLTON
ATLAS MINERALS
BASHAW, TPFD L.
NATURAL POWERS C
STEWART, LESLEY
NAVAJO TRIPE
BLAKE, DONA',0 V.
BALSLEY, H.w.
liOODMOMT INC.
ATLAS MINERALS
STEWART, WESLEY
NICK J. MI'PPHY
fUXWELL.MELVIN
SAYKO, CHARLIE
NAVAJO TRIBE
LARRY SHUMWAY
TEPGISA INC
NOON AN R J
JOHVSON, DAVE
ASIMUS, C.C.
BLEAK, CHARLES
LEWIS, W.E
"OKI UPAN.SYNDIC
DENTON F.J.
SUTHERLAND X C
STATE OF UTAH
SHUMtaAY* CADE
STATE OF UTAH
ANDERSON BROS,DP
COSTANZA,JOSEPH
CONFEDERATED ME.T
THOMPSON, NOEL
ATOMIC RESOURCES
RRUNKE, W.W.
W.C.T.ENGINEEPIN
URANIUM PROCESSF
PARAMOUNT URAN.C
VCLDER5, JOHN
TOOTE MINERALS
MURPHY, OTTO
rooTE MINERALS
SOUTHERN CROSS U
COUNT*
SEC. TOWNSHIP
StN
SAN
; SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
C SAN
SAN
SAN
. S»"
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAH
SAN
1 SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
8»N
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
C BAN
SA^
SAN-
SAN
SAN
SAN
p SAN
SAN
I SAN
SAN
5 SAN
SAN
" SAN
r SAN
: SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
J SAN
JUJN
JU»N
JUAS
JUAN
JUAN
JUAN
JUAN-
JUAN
JUAN
JUA»I
JUA*
JUSN
JUA»J
JUA1*
JUAN
JUAN
JUAN
JUAN
JUA^
JUAN
JUAN
JUAN
JUAn
JUAN
JUAN
JUAf
JUAN
JUAN
JUAN
JUAN
JUAN'
JUAN
JUAt
JUAN
JUAN
JUAN
JUAN
JUAN
JUAN
JUAN
JUAN
JUAN
JUAN
JUAN
JUAN
JUAN
JUAN
JUAN
3
3
26
3
14
6
33
11
14
30
26
15
31
6
11
34
19
37 S
37 S
31 S
30 S
27 S
24 S
28 S
31 S
27 S
31 S
35 S
43 S
27 S
37 S
31 S
35 S
31 S
RANGE
0
21.0 E
21.0 E
0
0
0
24.0 E
24.0 E
0
0
23.0 E
0
24.0 E
23.0 E
24.0 r
0
23.0" E
25.0 F
24.0 F
0
14.0 E
0
0
0
23.0 E
0
0
0
0
0
16.0 F
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
24.0 t
0
0
0
25.0 E
0
25.0 E
0
0
0
MERID.
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
MINING
METHOD
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNrfERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
USDE4GRO
SURFACE
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNOERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNOERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNOERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
TOTAL PRODUCTION
(TONS AS OF 01/01/79)
DEPTH
(FT.)
1,000
1,000 -
1,000 -
MOO, 000
loo
1,000 -
1,000
1,000 -
1,000 -
1,000 -
1,000 -
100
1,000 -
1,000 -
1,000 -
100
100
1,000 -
100
1,000
100,000
100,000
100,000
<100
-------
IHACT1VE URANIUM MINES IN THE UNITED STATES
SOURCEl DOE, GRAND JUNCTION, COLORADO
PACE 65
MINE MAKE
»#»«*»*#*« UTAH
VISION
w.J.l
W.N.
WABAN MINE
WATERLOG
WATERl.OP-STEPLAD
WEST PAY DAY
WHEF.LER
WHIRLWIND
WHITE CANYON STK
WHITE HCRSE GhOU
VilLLIE
WIND BLOWI
WINDFALL 27
'WOELTER
WOODROW WILSON
WYOMING
YELLOW BABY
YELLOK GIRL
YELLOW JOHN
YELLOW PAIL 1
ZIG ZAG
P.B.B.
FLAT TIKE 2
BOBO
BPENDA GROUP,
BUZZARD 1
CPO* 1
DEVILS CAVE
EUREKA4.CANARY B
GREEN POCK
HORSE EAR
LION 5
LONE PEA*
RATTLESNAKE
SANDY
SATIN GROUP
STEPHENS
ANNAS PRIDE
KOL08
LOCALORT 1
SILVER POIST LOP
6ILVERM.AN 2
VANDERBILT
BIG JIM.LITTLE J
BLACK JACK
BLUE RIBBON
BLUE STONE
CONTROLLER NAME
COUNTY
(CONT'DJ «»»«»«
PLATEAU PNG. CO,
CASTOR + STEWART
YUBA DEVELOP. CO.
RALPH J NOONdN
MALEY WINING co.
DUNCAN WALTER JR
DANIEL R.B.
OSULLIVAN«THIRKE
NAVAJO TRIBE
rooTE MINERALS
BARRY, ROBERT «.
UNKNOWN CONTROL*
SAN MIGUEL MINES
ATLAS-FOOTE
LYMAN, BOB
NEILSO", MILTON
NEILSON, MILTON
MCRZ * KNOX
KNOX, HAPPY
JIM C. BUTT
F.« C. WESTERN MG
MAUGUM, CARL
APPIER, DAVID
KARYSVALE URAN.C
TEXAS PLU"GERS+A
J-EHNAB CO.
HAMILTON ASSOC.
HAMILTON, STEVE
HARTINSEN, V.LYNN
COOPER « SANDS
ShOVTS, OARRELL
MOTT, ORSON
ERRISA L.M.
HARRISON J.H.
ANSON, DELHER C.
COLOTAH URANIUM.
FLUKEY + HUNT
LA FLOPECITA MNG
STATE OF UTAH
LA VOHKIN M.NG.
LA FLORECITA MNG
WESTERN EQUITIES
E»GER, WALTER c.
SMITH » HUNT
HC CAULEY, EUGENE
BROKM, J.F.
BLUE STONE MNG
SAN JUAV
SAN JUA»
SAN JUAM
SAN JUAN
SAN JUAN
SAN JUAN
SAN JUAN
SAN JU«N
SAN JUAN
SAN JUAK
SAN JUAN
SAN JUA.J
SAN JUfV
SAN JUA'J'
SAN JUAN
SAN JUAN
3A«< JUIN
SAN JUAN
SAN JUAN
SAN JUAN
SAN JUAN
SAN JU£ ^
SEVJER
UINTAH
UINTAH
UINTAH
UINTAH
UINTAH
UINTAH
UINTAH
UINTAH
UIMTAH
UINTAH
UIWTAH
UINTAH
WASHINGTON
WASHINGTON
WASHINGTON
WASHINGTON
WASHINGTON
WASHINGTON
WAYNE
WAYNE
WAYNE
WAYNE
21 3 S
16 37 S
S
36 24 S
11 36 S
35 30 S
13 44 N
24 76 S
6 41 S
17 41 S
RANGE
0
0
1.7 E
0
21.0 E
0 F
19.0 E
0
0
0
25.0 E
0
0
0
0
24.0 E
0
0
20.0 V
0
0
0
0
4.0 W
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
13.0 K
13.0 W
0
0
0
0
MERID.
24
24
24
24
24
24
22
24
24
24
MINING
METHOD
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGPO
utiDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERG.RO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGKO
UNOERGRO
SURFACE
SURFACE
UNOERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNOERGRO
UNOERGRO
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNOERGRO
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
UNOERGRO
SURFACE
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
TOTAL PRODUCTION
{TONS AS OF 01/01/79)
DEPTH
(FT,)
100
100
1,000 -
1,000 -
100
1,000 -
1,000 -
1,000
100
1,000
100
100
1,000 -
100
1,000
- 1,000
100,000
100,000
<100
<100
- 1,000
<100
100,000
<100
<100
<100
<100
100,000
<100
100.000
- 1,000
<100
<100
100,000
- 1,000
<100
<100
<100
100
200
150
too
0
250
250
250
150
0
0
0
0
too
0
0
0
0
0
50
0
0
so
100
0
0
0
50
50
0
50
0
0
0
0
0
100
0
0
50
0
0
ISO
0
50
50
50
too
1
cr>
en
-------
INACTIVE URANIUM NINES IN THE UNITED STATES
SOURCEl DOE, GRAND JUNCTION, COLORADO
PACE 66
MINE
CONTROLLER NAME COUNTY
SEC. TOWNSHIP
RANGE MCRID.
MINING
METHOD
TOTAL PRODUCTION
(TONS AS OF 01/01/79)
DEPTH
(FT.)
»«**»« UTAH
(CONT'D) **»#**»»
BRIDGER JACK
CONGRESS :e
FAIRVIEK
CRAYRAR
GREEN HCB^FI
GREEN MONSTER
GHEENLIGHT + KJM
HECLA
HELM GROUP
HILLERS 1
ISSIANN 1
JANUARY
LA VCLL i
LAST CHANCE 3
LOVELL 1
LUSCOM6E 3
"AMA + PAPA BEAR
NORTON
OAK CREtK
OAK RIDGE
OLD CPO*-
ORAL 1 * 2
POOR BOY 1
SOUTH FC1PK 1
THUNDERING HERD
TURRET 1
WILD HORSE MESA
YELLOW CAHAFY
BIG DANE
BULL DOG 1
CAT 1
CUB 1
HOLE 4
SUSIE SELL
BRIDGES, JACK INC
INDUSTRIES+MINES
ROBINSON, ELWIN
POCKY MTN URA
ALAKCO INC.
CAPITOL REEF URA
EL'LETT, P.UI.ON s.
HECLA MINING co.
HATCH, DKAIN + CL
PENNELL URANIUM
ISABEL VNG.CO.
LYMAN, BOP
SKISEP+SKlNERtB
GREAT WESTERN UR
IMPERIAL URANIUM
PELICAN URANIUM
P + P ASSOCIATES
ROCKY MTN.URAM,
LYMAN, BOP
UNKNOWN CONTROLS
WONDERLAND MNG
JENSEN + KOIJPIS
ROPER, P.L.
CROWN DEVEL CO
TACONY URANIUV
UTAH SOUTHERN UP
US COMMON WEALTH
CHRISTENSEN+MAT
CURTIS E.P.
PEACOCK+NEILSON
WALLACE, KELVIN J
TUSHER MIMNG co
PETTY KNG + EXPL
SADDLER, DON
WAYNE
WAYNE
WAYNE
WAY"E
WAYSE
WAYNE
WAYNE
WAYNE
VAYNr,
WAYNE
WAY»C
WAYNE
WAYNE
WAYNE
WAYf.E
WAYNf!
k'AY'iE
WAYNE
WAY^E
WAYNE
WAYNE
WAYNE
WAYNE
WAYNE
WAYNT
WAYNE
WAYNE
WAYNE
UNKNOWN
UNKNOWN
UNKNOWN
UMfNO«N
U(IKNO*N
UNKNOWN
*««« WASHINGTON »*»«»»«*»»**
H.P.S, CLAMS
LOST CREEK 4
OUARTZ RIDGE GPO
CLIME LEASE
DAHL LEASE
DAHL TRACT A
HANSON LEASE
HCREM MOORE LEAS
HUFFMAN LEASE
IMGRAM LEASE
GREEN NUGGET MNf,
ATOMIC SILVER CP
ATOMIC SILVER CP
UNKNOWN CONTROLR
KAPEM, OSCAR
HAREM, MRS. LETHA
UNKNOWN CONTROLP
HAREM, OSCAR
HUTMAN.ELLA
UNKNOWN CONTROLR
PEND OREILLF
PEND OREILLE
PEKD OREILLE
SPOKANE
SPOKANE
SPOKANE
SPOKANE
SPOKANE
SPOKANE
SPOKANE
11
18
28 N
28 N
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
44.0 F
0
0
0
0
45.0 E
33
UNOERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
SURFACE
UNOERGRO
UNOERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERCRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDE.RGHO
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
100
100
100
100
ICO
1,000
<100
<100
<100
1,000
<100
<100
<100
1,000
<100
<100
<100
<100
<100
0
<100
1,000
<100
<100
<100
<100
<100
<100
0
50
50
50
50
100
150
0
150
50
150
100
150
50
100
50
0
50
100
50
0
50
100
50
50
150
50
50
0
0
0
0
0
0
100 1,000
,000 - 100,000
100 - 1,000
1,000
100
1,000 - 100,000
100 . 1,000
100 - 1,000
1,000 - 100,000
100 » 1,000
100 - 1,000
50
100
0
50
50
100
50
too
100
50
cr>
cr>
-------
INACTIVE URANIUM MINES IN THE UNITED STATES
SOURCEl DOE, GPAN0 JUNCTION, COLORADO
PACE 67
MINE HAKE
CONTROLLER NAME
COUNTY
8EC, TOWNSHIP
LEHMBECKER LEASE
MOURNING LEASE
LOWLEY LEASE
»* WYOMING
AJAX 42
ALBANY
DESERT ROSE LEAS
NIGHT Ot»L
BASHAWN 2
BROKEN HEART 8
HIGH NOON 3
HORSESHOE JOHN
JET 0
LEO 1-6
MIKE MICKEY
SANGUINE 12
TRI-PACER
ABLE, BAKER, CHAPL
ANO»ALY261,4.42-
ANOMALY96, 16-45-
AXE 10
8 GROUP
BAR NONE 11
BIG HORN 3
BILL + EARL CL»I
BLACK STAR-RLUF:
BRUCE CL'I^S
CAMBL1N 2
CAM8LIN WEST
CHRYSOPS1, 30-41-
COLO SPOT 4+5
COLORADO CHRI5TE
COLUMBUS GROUP
CORA + BETTY
POE * CHRISTENSE
DOHE BUTTE
GAP GROUP
HA+RUTH SCHLAUTM
HOE CLAIMS
INNES LEASE
IRA 1
JAKE CME1920-41-
JEANETTE 1
JOE I
JOYCE
TO* ICONT'D) »
LEHMBECKEP.W.E.
OIMIIPOFF, JACK
NESTERN NUCLEAR
ASPEN MINING CO.
WATERS + CUNDALL
SFXTON, LINCOLN K
BATTLE AXF MNG.C
BONNEVILLF BASIN
SUPER CUB MNG. CO
SKYWAYS EXPLORAT
SANTA RITA MNG.*
MODERN MINES OEV
FINK, HERMAN
HANSON
HOLLAND, ROBERT L
TITAN MINING CO.
HIGHLAND URANIUM
KERR-MCGEE COPP.
KERR-MCGEE CORP.
AXE URANIUM CO,
LOGA1 CHUPCHILL
UNKNOWN CONTROLR
BIG HILL MINING
GARDNER, F.L,
PO«EN,HEPLDO« H,
POSENBERGEP.GENF
1.HYNOT PROSPECTI
HUHD H.P.* ASSOC
KERR-MCGEE CORP.
GILBERT, MORSE C
PO*EN,HEPLDON H.
BALL, GRACE. D.MRS
HAMLIN EXPL+MNG.
WESTERN URANIUM
NELSON + SPAIN
LITTLE PHCEBE UR
LITTLE STAR MNG
AMERICAN NUCL.CP
WESTERN URANIUM
BUTLER, RY6UPN
KERR-MCGEF CORP.
BOWFN.HERLDON H,
CORRELL E.O.
GILBERT, MORSE C
SPOKANE
SPOKANE
STEVENS
#*«*#»*
ALBANY
ALBANY
ALBANY
ALBANY
BIG HORN
BIG HORN
BIG HORN
BIG HORN
BIG HORN
BIG HORN
BIG HORN
BIG HORN
BIG HORN
CA"PBELL
CAMPBELL
CA*P«ELL
CAMPBELL
CA*PBfLL
CAMPBELL
CAMPBELL
CAXPBELL
CAMPBELL
CAMPBELL
CAMPBELL
CAMPBELL
CAMPBELL
CAMPBELL
CAMPBELL
CAMPBELL
CAMPBELL
CAMPBELL
CAMPBELL
CAMPBELL
CAVPBELL
CAMPBELL
CAMPBELL
CAMPBELL
CAMPBELL
CAMPBELL
CAMPBELL
CAMPBELL
9
29
22
23
22
28
23
4
16
8
17
20
33
10
A
2B
4
20
25
27
5
29
21
35
5
3
11
19
22
33
13 N
45 N
58 N
5H N
58 N
58 N
43 N
42 »
45 N
43 N
44 N
45 N
44 N
44 K
43 N
44 N
43 N
41 N
43 N
45 N
43 N
43 N
45 N
45 N
43 N
44 N
46 N
45 N
43 N
41 N
45 N
N
44 N
RANGE
0
0
0
0
0
78.0 W
0
75.0 V
0
0
0
94.0 w
94.0 W
94.0 W
0
94,0 W
76.0 H
76.0 fc
7*,0 H
75.0 W
75.0 h
75.0 H
0
75.0 W
75.0 W
76.0 w
75.0 W
75.0 W
73.0 H
76.0 W
75.0 H
76.0 K
75.0 K
76.0 K
76.0 W
75.0 W
75.0 w
76.0 W
75.0 W
75.0 w
71.0 ti
75,0 W
0 K
75.0 W
MERID,
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
MINING
METHOD
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNOERGRO
UNDERGRO
UNOERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNOERGRO
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
TOTAL PRODUCTION DEPTH
(TONS AS Of 01/01/79) (FT.)
too - 1,000 so
too - 1,000 $o
100 - 1,000 50
<100
<100
<100
<100
<100
<100
too - 1,000
100 1,000
1,000 - 100,000
100 - 1,000
1,000 100,000
-------
INACTIVE URANIUM HIKES IN THE UNITED. STATES
SOURCE| DOE, GRAND JUNCTION, COLORADO
PACE 69
KINE NAPE
CONTROLLER NAME
COUNTY
SEC. TOWNSHIP
RANGE HERID.
MINING
METHOD
TOTAL PRODUCTION
(TONS AS OF 01/01/79)
DEPTH
CFT.)
#**«» WYOMING
(CONT'O) «*«****»*»
SCHLAUT*AN
LAUR S. 19
LUCKY EIGHT 1
MARY 1
MC CLAIMS
MIRACLE MILE
MYSTERY 2
NERO 5 + 17
ORR 2
OSAGE LEASE
PAT 3
PETE GROUP
PRAEST LEAS;
QUEEN 2
R.H.O. TEKRA
ftr.HO LEASE
SABLF
SCPTT i
SEC.36.43N-76.
SIMMONS 2
STUPLIN "INE
SUE 3
SYL DEL MISE
TRIANGLE
TRIX GROUP
VAN BUGGESUil SCO
WHITE MULE 1
AJC
8ALD KNOB
CEDAR HLS-JAC"RA
0»VE LEA* ORE
PAVE SEC 9+10*15
DEL ORO 1
HELEN MAY
KETTCHUM BUTTE L
LITTLE LILL-JB D
LITTLE MAN 1
NALL LEASE
POISON BASIN
SEC 10 LEAN ORE
SEC.3«,2S*-fc *
TETON.LUCKY SIRI
TSG 1
TSG HEAP LEACH
URANIUM KING 1
WALKER-SULLIVAN
ANOMALYD7 28-37-
BETTY
LITTLE STAR MNG
WHYN'OT PROSPSCTI
BO'lD, JACK
BOXEN, H.H.
hILK, MAX
MOORE, GEORGE R.
HOT SA'iOS URAN C
UTN STATES MNG.
GILA URAN.CORP.
BOi-EN,*ERLDfM H.
MIDDLE BUTTE MNG
WESTERN URANIUM
GILBERT, MORSE
BOrfEN.MERLDON H.
kESTERM URANIUM
GEQRESOURCES.INC
GILBERT, MORSE
f .S.SCMLAUTMAN
GILBERT, KORSE
KYO ROC DEVEL
BOrfEN, H.K.
MASEK, J.J..
SYL DEL MINTS
URANIUM CORPORA!
HURD H.R.* ASSOC
UNKNOWN
"ESTRN STfN.URAN
UNION CARBIDE CP
KGS JOINT VENTUR
GETTY-SKELLY UJV
PFLUG, RICHARD I
ARMSTRONG. H.T,
UNKNOWN CONTROLR
KERP MCGEE
UNKKOWN CONTROLP
TEXAS UTILITIES
HOMESTEAD MINRLS
KGS JOINT VENTUR
BAILEY, ROBERT V.
HOMESTEAD MINRLS
KGS JOINT VENTUR
KGS JOINT VENTUP
PLATT.RE +NORISS
KERP MCGEE
KERR-MCGEr CORP.
KERR-MCGEE CORP.
CA>IPB6.LL
CAMPBELL
CAMPBELL
CAMPBELL
CAMPBELL
CAMPBELL
CAMPBELL
CAMPBELL
CAMPBELL
CAMPBELL
CAMPBELL
CA«PBELL
CAMPBELL
CAMPBELL
CAMPBELL
CAMPBELL
CAMPBELL
CAMPBELL
CAMPBELL
CAMPBELL
CAMPBELL
CAMPBELL
CAMPBSLL
CAMPBELL
CAMPBELL
CAMPBELL
CAMPBELL
CARBON
CAPBO.V
CARBON
CAHBO'/
CARBON
CARBON
CARBON
CARBON
CARBON
CARBON
CARBON
CARBON
CARBON
CARBON
CARBOM
CARBOis
CARBON
CARBON
CARBON'
CONVERSE
CONVERSE
27
19
10
22
27
27
28
15
5
32
9
3
11
22
19
34
9
11
36
26
30
17
3
28
29
34
10
14
32
10
17
26
4
6
9
11
28
25
45 N
43 N
44 N
45 N
43 N
45 N
43 N
43 N
45 N
46 N
43 N
43 N
45 N
45 M
43 N
42 N
42 N
44 N
43 N
44 N
43 N
44 N
43 N
41 N
43 N
44 N
44 N
25 N
13 N
27 N
28 N
28 N
12 N
12 N
27 N
27 N
37 N
41 N
75.0 W
74.0 W
76.0 W
75.0 K
76.0 W
75.0 W
76.0 W
76.0 W
74.0 W
74.0 W
75.0 '*'
76.0 -1
75.0 W
75.0 W
75.0 W
73.0 W
75.0 »
75.0 W
76.0 W
75.0 W
75.0 "
75.0 H
75.0 «
75.0 W
75,0 «
75.0 «
75.0 W
0
81.0 W
92.0 H
0
78.0 W
0
92.0 W
0
0
0
78.0 W
92.0 h
0
0
92.0 W
78.0 *
0
0
78.0 K
73.0 W
74.0 *i
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
..
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
LO»CRADE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
HL-DUMPS
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
HL-DUMPS
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
ICO
too
100
100
too
100
1,000 *
100
100
100
ICO
100
1,000 -
MOO, 000
MOO, 000
1,000
100
1,000
1,000
1,000 -
1,000 -
MOO, 000
1,000 -
MOO, 000
1,000
<100
<100
<100
- 1,000
- 1,000
- 1,000
<100
- 1,000
1,000
i,ooc
-------
INACTIVE UPANIUH MINES IN THE UNITED STATES
SOUPCEl DOE, GRAND JUNCTION, COLORADO
PACE 69
MINE NAME
CONTROLLER NAME
COUNTY
SEC, TOWNSHIP
**»****<>« WYOMING
(CONT'Dl »*»«
BETZF.R LEASE
BOX CREEK
CANON BALL 1
CONVERSE «INE
CURRIER 1
HARDY LSF 27-38-
JACKALOPE 13
JOE CROUP
JUDY 1-14
LAMB
LILA BUZZ "INKS
LUCKY A'.N MIKEY
MINE 1 (D-B)
MINE 20-8 53-31-
NORTH POLE 1
REYNOLDS T36N-P7
SEC. 3.37N-73*
SEC, 9,37>i-7V,.
6EC,10,37N-7Ji" D
SEC.15,37M-73"
SEC.16.37V-73*'
SEC.21.37K-73" N
SHEEPSHEP GROUP
SPOOK
SPRING GROUP
STROCK-BOBCAT-LE
TRAIL CREEK GRnU
TURNERCRFST
ZEE 1 + 2
A.+H.
A.A.SISSON
ACKERMAN LEASE
BUSrtELD LEASE
CABIN CREEK 6
DENNIS 2 LFASE
GRIFFITH LEASt
HAUBER MINE UG
HELMER RAVCH
HOLMES LEASE
HOMESTAKE 1-4
K GROUP
LAYHON LfASE
LEWIS DENNIS LEA
MEYERS LEASE
NEK HAVEN 20-SEC
NORTH SLOPE
POISON CREEK CLA
SADDLE GROUP
SMATHE«S * DILTS
UNITED NUCLEAR
UNKNOWN CONTROL,
100RE-HANBLIN
KEPP-»«CGEE CORP,
JACKALOPE OIL+M.
CRABTREE, JOHN M
COrfAN J.L,
UNKNOWN CONTROL.
NEOCO
STARVES, JOEL
JARRETT ENTEHPRI
KF.RP-MCGEE CORP.
BENSON + CAMBLIN
KERF-MCGEF CORP.
KERR-MCGES: CORP.
KERR-MCGEE CORP.
KERR-PCGEE CORP.
KERP-MCGEF CORP.
KERR-MCGEF CORP.
KEPR-MCGEE CORP.
BOXEN, HFRt.DQN H.
HORNBUCKLE.DICK
AI.LSUP. DARR«:L B
JOHN PETFPSOf AS
PHI''NEY,B.D.ETAL
KERR-MCGEF. CORP.
KERP-^CCEE CORP.
UNKNOh* CCNTROLR
KERP. MCGEE
FEDERAL RFSOORCE
FEDERAL RESOURCE
TRI STATE MINING
KICHAUD MINING C
GRIFFITH, LYLE
HOMf.STA.M- MUG CO
CHRIS HELMER
TENN. VALLEY AUTH
GEORESOURCES.IHC
TENN. VALLEY AUTH
FEDERAL RrSOURCF
LITTLE MQ MINING
TENN. VALLEY AUTH
HOMESTAKE MNG CO
UNKNOWN CONTROLR
BAKER, IRVIN
LYNARD +KPIPLEAN
CONVERSE
CONVERSE
CONVERSE
CONVERSE
CONVERSE
CONVERSE
CONVERSE
CONVERSE
CONVERSE
CONVERSE
CONVERSE
CONVERSE
CONVERSE
CONVERSE
CONVERSE
CONVERSE
CONVERSE
CONVERSE
CONVERSE
CONVERSE
CONVERSE
CONVERSE
CONVERSE
CONVERSE
CONVERSE
CONVERSE
CONVERSE
CONVERSE
CONVERSE
CROOK
CROOK
CROOK
CROOK
CROOK
CROOK
CROOK
CROOK
CROOK
CROOK
CROOK
CROOK
CROOK
CROOK
CROOK
CROOK
CROOK
CROOK
CROOK
2
1
14
2
15
12
26
2
12
31
3
3
17
3
9
10
15
16
21
12
26
30
27
25
27
7
34
26
3
26
2
19
18
26
26
27
21
10
7
12
22
35 N
35 N
40 N
32 N
38 H
35 N
38 N
32 W
35 N
35 N
37 N
37 N
N
36 N
37 N
37 N
37 N
37 N
37 N
37 K
35 N
38 N
40 N
33 N
41 H
38 N
54 N
56 N
56 N
55 N
52 N
55 H
54 N
54 N
52 N
56 N
52 N
52 N
55 N
54 N
54 N
55 N
RANGE
0
72.0 W
72.0 V
75.0 W
69.0 w
73.0 n
72.0 *
73.0 W
69.0 W
72.0 *
71.0 u
0
73.0 W
73.0 w
0 W
73.0 K
73.0 W
73.0 *
73.0 W
73.0 W
73.0 *
71,0 »
72.0 W
73.0 w
74.0 4
72.0 w
0
74.0 w
73.0 W
0
60.0 W
66.0 K
66.0 W
0
67.0 W
66.0 K
67.0 K
60.0 W
65.0 W
66.0 W
66.0 V
66.0 V
0
65.0 W
67. n W
60.0 W
67.0 V
65.0 W
MERID.
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
MINING
METHOD
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRQ
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
TOTAL PRODUCTION
(TONS AS OF 01/01/79)
1,000 -
100
1,000 -
1,000 -
1,000 -
1,000
too
.1.000 -
1,000
1,000 -
100
1,000 -
1,000 -
MOO, 000
1,000 -
1,000
1,000
1,000 -
1,000 -
1,000 -
MOO,000
100
1,000 -
1,000
l.ooo -
1,000 -
1,000 -
100
1,000 -
<100
100,000
- 1,000
100,000
<100
100,000
<100
100,000
<100
100,000
<100
- 1,000
<100
<100
<100
<100
100,000
100,000
100,000
- 1,000
100,000
100,000
<100
<100
<100
<100
100,000
100.000
<100
<100
100,000
100,000
<100
100,000
100,000
- 1,000
100,000
100,000
100,000
100,000
100,000
1,000
100,000
<100
<100
<100
DEPTH
(FT.)
50
50
50
150
50
100
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
100
50
50
100
100
50
150
100
too
50
100
50
50
50
50
100
0
50
50
so
50
50
100
400
0
100
so
100
200
50
50
50
50
50
50
-------
INACTIVE URANIUM KINKS I" THE UNITED STATES
SOURCE I DOE, GRAND JUNCTION, COLORADO
PAGE 70
MINE
CONTROLLER NAME COUNTY
SEC, TOWNSHIP RANGE MERID.
MINING
METHOD
TOTAL PRODUCTION
(TONS AS OF 01/01/79)
DEPTH
cri.)
*«»»»««#
STATE LEAST
STORM MINE
T.F.WOLFSKILL LS
VIRGINIA 16
ANDRIA (C PIT)
»NDRIA GROUP
ARROViHEAD(CQP.MT
B.+H. 1
B.H.HALL-BONAS'ZA
BEATRICE 3
BIG RED 4
BLACKSTONE 51
BLARCO
BLUE BUCK-RED. HO
BOUNTIFUL 1,9+10
BULLPUSH DU^P
BULLRUSM GROUP
CAL 15
CINCH 15
CLEANUP MATERIAL
DAY 26
DAY-BERGER LEASE
DAY-LOMA
DISCOVERY
DONNA LEE
DUBOI5 1
EUREKA-1MPERIAL
FANNIF 1-4
FEDERAL
FPAZIER-LAMAC GR
GEORGE + VER GPO
GEORGE 1 AND 2
GEORGE 12+14
HADES 17
HAPPY 19
HAZEL GROUP
HEAP LEACH (UTAH
HESITATION
HOPE-STAR
HUNTER LEASE
IDIOTS DELIGHT
JACK 2
JAY CROUP
JEM 1
JOHN-GUNNEL
JOY GROUP
LAST CHANCE
LITTLE STORY 6
CCONT'D) »«
STATE OF WYOMING
HOMESTAKE HNG CO
ROUNDS + 8HPIMER
ROCKY MTN.URAN.
FEOIRAL AMEPICAN
FEDERAL AMERICAN
ROCKY MTN.ENERGY
HAYS, RICHARD
FORD.ROBERT+ASOC
ARMSTRONG. H.T,
RRIDGER MNG CO
"ESTERN NUCLEAR
J.M.WAOE
VIPONT MINING CO
WESTERN NUCLEAR
WESTERN NUCLEAR
WESTERN NUCLEAR
FEDERAL AMERICAN
WILLIAMS, A.E.
PETFRS, REX
WESTERN f'UCLEAP
REEVES, M.J.
ENERGY FUELS NUC
"ELLS, JOHN
PETERS, Rp:x
KAYE MINERALS IN
WYOMING fiUCLEAP
STAMM, ED
FEOf.RAL AMERICAN
WESTERN NUCLEAR
FEDERAL AMERICAN
UNION CARBIDE CP
UNION CARBIDE CP
REX PETERS
MACK LANG URAN.C
WESTERN NUCLEAR
PATHFINDER
GENEVA UPAN CORP
UNKNOWN CONTROLP
DALE B. LEV I
PATHFINDER
UNION CARBIDE CP
FEDERAL AMERICAN
HERRSTROM H.Q.
FEDERAL AMERICAN
UNION CARBIDE CP
SAN JUAN UFA*.EX
LITTLE STORY GRP
CROOK
CROOK
CROOK
CROOK
FREMONT
FREMONT
FREMOS'T
FREMONT
FHEMONT
FREMONT
FREMONT
FREMONT
FREMONT
FREMONT
FREMONT
FPFMONT
FREMfMT
FREMONT
FREMONT
FRCKOKT
FREMONT
FREMONT
TPEMCKT
FREMONT
FREMONT
FREMONT
FRFMONT
FREMONT
FRF,«ONT
FREMONT
FREMONT
FREMONT
FREMONT
FREMONT
FREMONT
FREMONT
FREMONT
FREMONT
FREMONT
FREMONT
FREMONT
FRF.MONT
FREMONT
FREMONT
FREMONT
FREMONT
FREMONT
FREMONT
17
6
15
32
1
26
B
33
22
12
9
22
29
29
24
3
24
29
5
24
29
2
27
22
30
30
9
27
12
1
12
6
26
15
25
6
54
55
54
57
32
40
33
40
33
32
33
33
33
33
32
39
32
40
33
41
33
39
33
33'
33
33
28
40
32
32
32
32
33
39
33
32
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
H
N
N
K
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
60
66
66
64
91
92
95
92
89
91
69
69
90
90
91
92
91
92
93
OB
90
92
90
90
90
90
92
92
90
91
91
91
90
92
90
90
.0
.0
0
.0
0
.0
.0
.0
.0
0
0
0
.0
.0
.0
0
.0
.0
0
0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
0
.0
.0
.0
,0
0
0
.0
0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
0
0
w
w
w
w
a
w
M
K
w
w
U
V .
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
K
w
w
N
H
w
w
w
w
H
N
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
6
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
LOWGRADE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
MISC.-PB
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
HL-DUMPS
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
100
1,000
1,000 -
1,000 -
1,000 -
>100,000
1,000 -
1,000 -
1,000 -
1,000 -
100
MOO, 000
1, 000 -
100
MOO, 000
1,000 -
MOO, 000
1,000 -
100
1,000 -
MOO, 000
1,000 -
1,000 -
1,000 -
100
too
1,000 -
1,000 -
1,000 -
MOO, 000
MOO, 000
MOO, 000
- 1,000
100,000
100,000
-------
INACTIVE URANIUM MINES IN THE UNITED STATES
SOURCEl DOE, GRAND JUNCTION, COLORADO
PAGE 11
MINE HAKE
CONTROLLER NAME
COUNT*
SEC. TOWNSHIP
*»«****
LOMA HEAP LEACH
MIDNIGHT 1
NELS GROUP
MEVIN GF*
PAN-PAT
PEACH GROUPCUU5
PHIL CP-1)
PIT A-6
PIT H-l
QUEENS GROUP
RAY 6
REX CLAIMS
RIM GROUP
RING + SANDUSKY
BOX GROUP
ROX LEACH
SAGEBRUfH-TRLSTK
SEC.16,33.»-89«
STAN
STOCKPILE CLEANU
SUN-SNOPALt
TORCHY
TWO C + BOZO
WASHAKIE
WASHOUT i
YELLOW PUCK-LiDG
YEM.OXSTOSE 1
ANTELOPE GPOI'P
MANN* GROUP
JERR1E MARIE GPO
KELL ROY 3 4 4
LUCKY SEVEN I
MASEK I
MISSEY GROUP
MOF. J4(A>IOVALY 8
N.STAP 1S>C(UOYMO
P CLAI* 8-45-
RED ROCK 2
SNAKEBITE 1-3
T BONE
VANCE 1
YANK 4
ANTELOPE 4
BAKKR 3,4,5+6
BRIDGES TRAIL
BUSS-RUSS
DRY LAKE
HEAP LEAC4 B-2
(CQNT'O) **#»*#»*»«#
WESTERN NUCLEAR FREMONT
BIG SKY URANIUM FREMONT
UNKNOWN CONTROL, FREMONT
JAY, G.I.. FREMONT
HEURY HUL'SPETH FREMONT
AMERICAN NUCLEAR FREMONT
P.JENKINS-HAND FREMONT
UNIOS' CARBIDE CP FREMONT
UNIOS CAKP.IDE CP FREMONT
5WANTON, k..F FREMONT
WESTERN NUCLEAR FREMONT
PATHFINDER FREMO-JT
PATHFINDER FREMONT
WAR BONNET URAN, FREMONT
ENERGY FUELS NUC FREf'OM
ENERGY FUELS NUC FREMONT
FEDERAL AMERICA FRKMONT
GREAT BASIN PETR FPE"0*T
UNION CARBIDE CP FREMOM
("ESTER'4 NUCLEAR FREMONT
WESTERN NUCLEAR FREMOCT
WOQTEN, CHARLENF FPFMnMT
HADE*. JIV FREMONT
ALLIED NUCLEAR FPEVOAT
WALKER, PJY^OND FRE"ONT
VIPO.N'T DIKING CO FREMONT
SHANTON, fc.F FREMONT
GEOPESOURCES/TN'C JOHNSON
HAMLIN EXFIi*vHG. JOHNSON
LITTLE GIANT URA JOHNSON
YOUNKIh, POY 0. JOHNSON
TREBELCOCK + KNI JOHNSON
ATOE MINING CO. JOHhSON
AMERICAN NUCL.CP JOHNSON
UNKNOWN COHTPOLP JOHNSON
SPEPBERG,JOHN J. JOHNSON
KERR-MCGEE CORP. JOHNSON
SOUTH PEAK MNG. JOHNSON
GEORESOURCES.INC JOHNSON
KERR-MCGEE CORP, JOHNSON
ROSENBEPGER.DUAN JOHNSON
SAN JUAN UPAN.EX JOHNSON
SPACE AGE NUCLEP NATRONA
JONFS +VANGILnEP NATRONA
HIGHLAND URAN.IN NATPONA
FEDERAL AMERICAN NATPONA
GEOPESOUPCES,INC NATRONA
UNION CARBIDE CP NATPONA
13
33
34
2
12
14
4
11
9
10
21
32
16
28
28
17
10
4
31
10
14
20
3
3
19
11
3
31
27
33
32 N
40 N
32 N
32 N
32 N
33 N
32 N
32 N
33 N
30 N
33 N
33 N
33 N
33 N
28 N
30 N
32 N
33 K
33 N
43 N
42 N
42 N
44 N
44 N
42 N
45 N
43 N
45 H
N
43 N
42 N
N
N
39 N
33 N
35 N
RANGE
0
0
91.0 W
92.0 w
99.0 W
90.0 W
91,0 W
89.0 K
0
0
90.0 W
91.0 d
89.0 X
97.0 W
89.0 X
0
90.0 w
89.0 *
90.0 w
0
92.0 W
0
96.0 w
94.0 W
0
89.0 W
e«.o w
77.0 W
77.0 W
0
78,0 w
77,0 W
83.0 w
78,0 w
76.0 V
80.0 w
76.0 «
0 W
77.0 w
75,0 W
0 W
0 W
0
77.0 W
0
89.0 K
79.0 W
0
MERID.
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
6
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
MINING
METHOD
HL-DUMPS
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
.SURFACE
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
HL-DUMPS
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
SURFACE
MISC.-PB
SURFACE
UNOERGRO
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
UNOERGRO
SURFACE
HL-DUMPS
TOTAL PRODUCTION
(TONS AS OF 01/01/79)
DEPTH
(FT.)
<100
<100
1,000 - 100,000
100 - 1,000
100 - 1,000
1,000 - 100,000
1,000 - 100,000
1,000 100,000
JOO 1,000
<100
<100
1,000 - 100,000
MOO, 000
<100
1,000 - 100,000
<100
MOO, 000
>100,OCO
1,000 - 100,000
loo - 1,000
1,000 - 100,000
<100
<100
1,000 - 100,000
<100
100 - 1,000
<100
1,000 - 100,000
1,000 - 100,000
<100
<100
<100
<100
100 - 1,000
100 - 1,000
<100
<100
<100
100 - 1,000
<100
<100
<100
<100
1,000 - 100,000
<100
1,000 - 100,000
<100
<100
250
0
150
so
50
400
50
150
0
50
50
100
150
50
350
0
200
50
100
0
350
0
0
50
0
50
50
50
50
0
50
50
30
50
50
150
150
50
50
50
50
50
so
so
50
350
100
150
-------
INACTIVE 'II
SnilRCFl
AMU*1 «INF.S I« THF UNITED STATES
COE, GPANn JUMCTIO»;, CCLORADO
FACE 72
Ct*;TRCLLKF.
COIKTY
(1C. Tt)«NSHlP
RANGE
PtRID.
MINING
METHOD
TOTAL PFQDL'CTIO.
(TO«S AS OK 01/01/79)
DEPTH
(FT.)
«ARS> GPOL'P
PAY - ALJrf
?I».r TREE GKO'.'P
PIT A-2
PIT P-I
PIT x-2
Rinr.f i * IKTOM
swnr e
SPA SAGE
T>E GP'JUH
VFCA PI 15
APEX i
90-EP J
CLAI" 1
-F.*G I
HIU.EF LFiS> 7
MOOHE 1
NEVADA 1-
*?* HOPf
POTTfH IF.4SF
PEED LF»S-:
SILVfP CLIFF f-AL
ALT CL*I-S
"FIGAS'D LEASE
PAPO 4
COL')E». AP-D*
LONE »OIF 1
LUC** Il.'PK 15
SEC. 36, J4.-14.-.
»l.ilST»l- 3
SCfPPlO*
SEC. i6-42>-so»
FFOF.PAL AvFKICAi: ''ATPH''
UNIO") CAP.PIDF. NATP'j:-*
VT1ERALS FXPL.CO NAT«ni«A
UHIOM CAOBIOF. CF 1ATPOV1
UNIO-1 C'SflDt CP hATPfN*
ut'-ifti CAP"iriE CP MATROVA
"F^T?., jnt »'ATOOst
T», ASPO'* PF.TRP NAT«0\1
CUMMKGHA*' CI'I 'JATPf't
FFDFSM, AMERICA XATCT-A
FFOFIHi '''F.RICA"' NATriONA
cnHLFF.OTTn KIO^PAPA
AS3nci«7£P ntVEL NjnjipiPA
"KSTEPJ U(-A«IU,»i htOPRAPA
HENG, vl.1'. NIC'fWAPA
^>LK£R, AER r «I(!hRAPA
CU^R.^ORBISOM v, MIOB^APA
JOHI-SO;. * V>»LKEP ':i'IfRAD*
BAPHAUGH PAG-'-Art tilOBRAHA
PEXIUS*F iTZHt'NRY WIOBPAF.A
S«'ITH, "".H. MJObRARA
LEMFN, MATTHEW H «IOPRARA
KAPT^E fT*POSK*JBF k;iOHHAPA
RocKy ST.^.MILL.* '0»'l CCVTROL. 51'HLEITf.
LUC^Y Jl'Nf *f'P,C S'FETAATtS
{LACK SHE'.P UPA'> S/FFT^ATF.*
BLACK SliTTFS URA S'.fET-'ATEP
ftfWt UPfi.ro. St.EET»AIEa
P>C*FP, FI.'IER hASi'AMf
S.t u,'fjG.« f'XPL ^AS^AKIE
viYn*i*.n, STATE OF isroii
2^ 33 N
15 33 f
15 33 %
25 34 ,(
34 37 «.
?2 33 >
21 33 :.
23 36 »
24 34 i.
23 31 *
30 26 a
3f. 24 «.
16 42 t
69
69
09
69
84
«9
R9
65
t.7
64
94
94
60
. 0 «'
.0 v,
0
0
f)
.0 »
.0 *
0
.0 *
,0 K
.0 /I
0
C
0
0
0
.n w
0
.0. K
.0 »
0
0
0
0
u
.C W
0
0
,0 U
0
0
.0 i
06
06
06
06
06
06
6
06
06
06
06
06
06
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFAC-C
UNQEKGRU
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACt
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
UN'OEHGRO
SURFACE.
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
UNUERGRO
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
UNDERGRO
SURFACE
1.000
>inj,ooo
1,000 -
i.ooo -
>10u,000
1,000 -
100
1,000 -
MOO, 000
>ioo,oco
100
100
100
ICO
100
100
100
100,000
<100
100,000
100,000
100,000
- 1,000
100,000
<10fr
<1CC
-------
INACTIVE URANIUM MINES IN THE UNITED STATES PAGE 7J
SOURCE! DOE, GRAND JUNCTION, COLORADO
MINE NAME CONTROLLER NAME COUNT* SEC. TOWNSHIP RANGE MERID, MINING 'TOTAL PRODUCTION DEPTH
METHUC (TONS AS OF 01/01/79) CKT.)
***»*****» UNKNOWN (CO^T'D) »»«»»«
MM STAHR r.+ C.EXPLORATIO UNKNOWN 0 SURFACE <100 0
-------
APPENDIX G
GENERAL OBSERVATIONS OF URANIUM MINE SITES IN
COLORADO, NEW MEXICO, TEXAS, AND WYOMING
-------
6-1
G.I. General observations on inactive uranium mine sites in Colorado,
New Mexico, Texas, and Wyoming
"Walk through" surveys were conducted at selected inactive uranium mines
in Colorado, New Mexico, Texas, and Wyoming. The primary purpose of the
"walk through" surveys was to note and describe the general environmental
conditions of the mines. Limited gamma radiation rate measurements were made
at each site and estimates were made of the volume and area of the mine
wastes. In addition, each waste area was observed for indications of wind
and water erosion and to see if the mine entry and vents were open to the
atmosphere.
G.I.I Colorado
The surveys were conducted at mining areas near Uravan and Boulder,
Colorado. Each area is listed, and the survey results at each mine are
discussed.
G.I.1.1 Uravan Area
The Uravan area lies within the Uravan Mineral Belt, which is situated
on the Utah-Colorado border, encompassing parts of Mesa, Montrose, and San
Miguel Counties in Colorado and Grand and San Juan Counties in Utah. Uranium
has been mined in the belt from the Salt Wash Member of the Morrison For-
^mation since 1900. About 150 mines were being worked in the belt in 1978.
Three companies have announced their intention to build mills in the belt
area (Wh78). Ore deposits are found mainly in sandstone lenses which are up
to 1,600 m wide and average about 15 m thick. The ore deposits range in size
from a few MT in the form of a fossil log to many thousands of MT. The ore
deposits generally range in thickness from a few centimeters to 7.6 m.
Irregularly shaped, they can be found almost anywhere within the sandstone
lenses. One study of the Salt Wash deposits indicated that 70 percent of the
deposits contained less than 2,700 MT of ore each (Wh78).
Since the ore bodies occur as rolls, pods, or tabular masses, their size
precludes the use of a prearranged and uniform stoping system. Mining
practices were to simply follow the ore and leave open stopes behind. Con-
sequently, a large number of relatively small mines have been operated in
this mineral belt. One mill processed ore from 200 mines which have produced
ore ranging from 91 to 910,000 MT.
-------
G-2
A substantial fraction of the inactive mines are located in or near the
Uravan Mineral Belt and are listed by State and county. A total of 1860
inactive uranium mines, or about 57 percent of all inactive uranium mines in
the entire United States, are located in or near the Uravan Mineral Belt.
State
Colorado
Colorado
Colorado
Utah
Utah
Utah
County
Inactive Mines
Mesa
Montrose
San Miguel
Emery
Grand
San Juan
Total
Surface
77
76
70
60
69
140
492
Underground
109
404
269
126
95
365
1368
G.I.1.1.1 Mine 1
This mine had a vertical shaft which was barricaded to prevent livestock
from falling into it; however, it remains open to the atmosphere. About
13,800 cubic meters of mine wastes were dumped on a downslope area adjacent
to the shaft presently covering an area of about 0.1 hectare (Fig. G.I).
There was evidence of wind and water erosion of the wastes. Exposure rates,
measured 0.914 m above the wastes, ranged from 140-170 yR/hr with several
spots reaching 250 yR/hr. Several small adjacent waste piles had exposure
rates of 110 yR/hr. No springs or standing water were observed near the
wastes.
G.I.1.1.2 Mine 2
This rim mine (Fig. G.2) faces the San Miguel river valley and produced
about 1,200 cubic meters of wastes, which were dumped down the canyon wall
and presently cover an area of about 0.4 hectare. Exposure rates measured
near the dump point were about 200 yR/hr; measurements on the road around the
ore bins ranged from 50-150 yR/hr. The mine entry remains open to the
atmosphere. There was evidence of wind and water erosion of the mine wastes.
-------
G-3
110 uR/hr
Waste Volume - 14,000m3
Surface Area =0.1 Hectare
VERTICAL SHAFT
(OPEN)
SORTED ROCK
Figure G.1 Plan view of inactive underground uranium mine No. 1, related
waste rock piles, and surface gamma exposure rates, Uravan
Mineral Belt, Colorado
-------
G-4
ENTRY (OPEN)
200 uR/hr
e
o
>
N«50-150jjR/hr
^
T*""
ORE BINS
Waste Volume = 1200m3
Surface Area = 0.4 Hectare
Figure G.2 Sectional view of inactive underground uranium mine No. 2, re-
lated waste rock piles, and surface gamma exposure rates,
Uravan Mineral Belt, Colorado
-------
G-5
6.1.1.1.3 Mine 3
This mine has an incline entry that remains open to the atmosphere. Two
waste piles were built up to support ore bins (Fig. G.3). About 38,300 cubic
meters of wastes, which have a surface area of about two hectares, are con-
tained in the two piles. Part of the waste piles extend into an adjacent
wash and are subject to water erosion. Wind erosion of the wastes was also
evident. Gamma exposure rates on the waste piles ranged from 120-150 yR/hr,
while areas adjacent to the piles were about 160 yR/hr. The exposure rate on
the mine access road was 80 yR/hr.
6.1.1.1.4 Mine 4
This was a rim mine with a portal remaining open. The mine wastes
volume was about 6,100 cubic meters covering an area of about 0.4 hectares
(Fig. G.4). Wastes have eroded down the slope, through a drain pipe under
the highway, and into the San Miguel River. Exposure rates on the access
road and under the ore bins were about 70 yR/hr. Wind erosion of the wastes
was also evident.
6.1.1.1.5 Mine 5
This mine contained a vertical shaft used for forced ventilation of
connecting mines (Fig. G.5). An undetermined amount of low-grade ore had
been dumped in small piles covering an area of about 5 hectares and was later
removed for milling. The two remaining piles cover about 1.2 hectares and
contain about 76,500 m of protore and barren wastes including clean-up
materials from the 5 hectare area. Gamma exposure rates over the former
waste area ranged from 50-150 yR/hr. Exposure rates over the consolidated
piles ranged from 50-220 yR/hr. Wind and water erosion were evident at both
the former and present waste storage areas.
6.1.1.1.6 Mine 6
This mine had a vertical shaft used to force ventilate connecting active
mines (Fig. G.6). About 45,900 cubic meters of wastes were dumped on a
downslope adjacent to the mine shaft and now cover about 0.4 hectare of
ground. Gamma exposure rates measured over the waste pile ranged from 180-220
yR/hr. Runoff and wind erosion of the wastes were evident. Some of the runoff
appeared to have entered a nearby stock pond.
-------
G-6
Waste Volume = 38,000m3
Surface Area = 2 Hectares
ENTRY(OPEN)
Figure G.3 Plan view of inactive underground uranium mine No. 3,
related waste rock piles, and surface gamma exposure rates,
Uravan Mineral Belt, Colorado
-------
G-7
ENTRY (OPEN)
ORE BINS
/aste Volume = 6,000m3
i
Surface Area - 0.4 Hectare
Figure G.4 Sectional view of inactive underground uranium mine No. 4, re-
lated waste rock piles, and surface gamma exposure rates,
Uravan Mineral Belt, Colorado
-------
G-8
VOLUME OF WASTES - 76,500 m3
SURFACE AREA OF WASTES:
1 - FORMER WASTE AREA - 5 Hectares
2 - WASTE PILES - 1.2 Hectares
FORMER SUB-ORE STORAGE AREA
SHAFT (PRESENTLY BEING
USED AS A VENT)
Figure G.5 Plan view of inactive underground uranium mine No. 5, related
rock piles, and surface gamma exposure rates, Uravan
Mineral Belt, Colorado
-------
G-9
WASTE PILE
(CONTOURED)
Waste Volume = 46,000m3
Surface Area = 0.4 Hectare
SHAFT (PRESENTLY
BEING USED
AS A VENT)
O
QC
Figure G.6 Plan view of inactive underground uranium mine No. 6, related
waste rock piles, and surface gamma exposure rates, Uravan
Mineral Belt, Colorado
-------
G-10
G.I.1.2 Jamestown Area
Uranium ore bodies in the Central City District area generally tend to
be small but high in grade. They are mined in conjunction with precious and
base-metal ores, particularly gold mining. Pitchblende, associated with all
types of veins and shoots, occurs in small pods or lenses systematically
arranged in some veins but erratically distributed in others (Si56). Small
quantities of pitchblende ore have been shipped from the Central City Dis-
trict since 1872; however, most of the ore mined before 1917 was used as a
source of radium. The fluorite ores of the Jamestown District contain small
amounts of base metal sulfides and some uranium ore. The quantity of uranium
ore was insufficient to be mined for uranium alone (Bu56). The surveys
conducted in the Jamestown, Colorado area were made to evaluate some mining
areas where uranium was recovered as a by-product.
G.I.1.2.1 Mine 7
This mine was relatively small and produced.high grade ore (Fig. G.7).
About 38 cubic meters of wastes remain around the shaft, and gamma exposure
rates of 400 yR/hr were measured. Erosion of the wastes into the nearby wash
was evident. Wind erosion is probably minimal. The mine shaft remains open
but filled with water.
G.I.1.2.2 Mine 8
This mine was principally a fluorspar producer; however, uranium ore was
also produced and sold (Fig. G.8). The mine shaft remains open to the atmo-
2
sphere. Mine wastes, adjacent to the shaft, occupy about 800 m , estimated
to be about 1,700 cubic meters. Gamma exposure rates on the waste pile
ranged from 60-80 yR/hr. Extensive water erosion of the wastes has occurred
and has produced exposure rates below the waste piles ranging from
40-100 yR/hr. Wind erosion of the wastes is probably minimal.
G.I.1.2.3 Mine 9
This mine (Fig. G.9) was located adjacent to the highway just south of
Jamestown, Colorado. The mine entry has been covered by a landslide. About
2
460 cubic meters of wastes, an area of about 400 m , are present on the site.
Exposure rates near the entry were about 100 yR/hr and ranged from 40-60
yR/hr near the highway.
-------
G-ll
Waste Volume = 38m3
Surface Area = 0.04 Hectare
Figure G.7 Plan view of inactive underground uranium mine No. 7,
related waste rock piles, and surface gamma exposure rates,
Central City District, Colorado
-------
G-12
Waste Volume = 1700m3
Surface Area - 0.1 Hectare
SHAFT (OPEN)
80-100uR/hr
40-60 uR/hr
Figure G.8 Plan view of inactive underground uranium mine No. 8, related
waste rock piles, and surface gamma exposure rates, Central
City District, Colorado
-------
Waste Volume = 460m3
Surface Area = 0.04 Hectare
X
3
o
-------
6-14
G.I.1.2.4 Mine 10
This mine was relatively small and the entry remains open (Fig. G.10).
Exposure rates near the entry ranged from 100-600 yR/hr. Exposure rates on
the mine access road were about 70 yR/hr. Piles containing mine wastes
occupy about 0.1 hectare with a volume of 150 cubic meters. Water and wind
erosion of the wastes was evident.
G.I.1.3 Summary
Those mines surveyed in the Uravan area are probably typical of the many
inactive uranium mines in that area. Most of the mines are underground and
relatively small. Wind and water erosion of the waste piles was evident at
all of the mines having entryways open, except where noted. Information
derived from these mine surveys is presented in Table G.I below. Some
typical mine waste piles are shown in Fig. G.ll. Subsequent photographs
depict a typical rim mine (Fig. G.12), an accumulation of wastes on a ledge
from a typical rim mine (Fig. G.13), and a mine waste dump from a rim mine
(Fig. G.14).
Table G.I Uravan and Jamestown areas
Mine Cubic Meters of Wastes Surface Area of Wastes (Hectares)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Uravan area
13,800
1,200
38,000
6,100
76,500
46,000
Jamestown area
38
1,700
460
150
0.1
0.4
2.0
0.4
1.2
0.4
0.04
0.08
0.04
0.1
-------
G-15
Waste Volume = 150m3
Surface Area = 0.1 Hectare
ENTR_Y (OPEN)
\
600 uR/hr
Figure G.10 Plan view of inactive underground uranium mine No. 10, related
waste rock piles, and surface gamma exposure rates, Central
City District, Colorado
-------
G-16
Figure G.11 Typical mine waste pile associated with a small- to medium-
sized inactive underground uranium mine in the Uravan Mineral
Belt, Colorado
Figure G.12 Side view of a typical underground uranium mine located on
the rim of a sandstone mesa in the Uravan Mineral Belt, Colorado
-------
6-17
9 '" ^ *
. i ~* ,
Figure G.13 Mine waste accumulations near the portal of a typical under-
ground rim-type uranium mine in western Colorado
Figure G.14 Mine waste dump associated with a typical rim-type
underground uranium mine in western Colorado
-------
6-18
Ore-hauling losses have occurred along the mine access and public
roads. In addition, mine wastes have been/used for road ballast. The ore
losses and mine wastes used for road construction probably became airborne
with some of the large quantities of dust produced by ore-hauling equipment.
The lands in the mining areas generally are used for grazing. Some enhanced
uptake of radioactive materials and trace metals by cattle may be occurring.
Exploratory drilling is abundant throughout the survey area. Little or no
reclamation of abandoned drill sites was observed.
Mines 7 through 10 were surveyed near Jamestown, Colorado. This type
of mine was prevalent in this area. Although uranium was not principally
produced by many of the mines, the mine wastes generally contain radio-
activity. Figure G.15 shows wastes at one such mine entering a stream.
Mine wastes producing exposure rates of 40-100 yR/hr in that area were used
as a fill for the Jamestown Park (210 acres). Evidence indicates that some
dwellings were built on or near the mine wastes. Surface and groundwater
contamination from the mining activities is possible.
G.I.2 New Mexico
Uranium mining operations are continuing to expand production through-
out the Grants Mineral Belt region of New Mexico. ' Underground mining is
predominant in the Ambrosia Lake, Churchrock, and Crownpoint areas. Surface
mining operations are also expanding at the Jackpile and St. Anthony mines
near Paguate/Laguna. However, the majority of inactive uranium mines are
located in the area around Grants; therefore, this area was selected for
the reconnaissance and field study surveys in New Mexico.
G.I.2.1 Inactive Surface Mines
Two inactive surface mining areas were observed - the Poison Canyon and
Zia strip mining areas. Both inactive sites appear to have been more of a
shallow strip mining operation compared to the extensive and deeper open pit
operations currently underway at the Jackpile and St. Anthony mines. Shallow
ore pockets were removed at the Poison Canyon and Zia areas, leaving relatively
small pits and waste piles scattered over several hectares. Field studies
were completed at several of the Poison Canyon open pits; the radiological data
obtained from these surveys are summarized below.
-------
G-19
Figure G.15 Movement of fluorspar-uranium mine wastes from a tailings pile
into a stream in the Jamestown area of Colorado
-------
G-20
6.1.2.2 Inactive Underground Mines
Six underground mines (vertical shaft and incline mining) were observed
on Mesa Montanosa: Beacon Hill, Davenport, Dog, Flea, Mesa Top, and Malpais.
Several of these mines (e.g., Mesa Top and Malpais mines) were interconnected
during their active mining periods. A few of these inactive mines are being
used today as fresh air intake points for active mining operations in the
area (e.g., mine vents of the inactive Gossett mine are being used in the
ventilation system of the active Poison Canyon Mine).
Five underground mines were visited in the Poison Canyon area - Barbara
Jane 1 and 3, Westvaco, Santa Fe, and Flat Top mines. Also visited were the
Marcus, San Mateo, Anaconda F-33, Hogan, Dakota, and Dysart No. 1 mines.
Table G.2 summarizes the reconnaissance and field study survey results.
G.I.2.3 Summary
In summary, the open pit (strip mining) areas of New Mexico have not
been restored and numerous shallow open pits or trenches remain with their
waste piles undergoing rainwater runoff and windblown contamination of sur-
rounding areas. Most of the inactive underground mine sites have had the
head frame and buildings removed and the portals sealed by timber or steel
plates to prevent entry, but openings do allow radon exhaust via natural
ventilation of the mine. Most mine sites have waste piles which are under-
going rainwater runoff and windblown contamination of surrounding areas. Most
of the cased mine vents are not capped to prevent radon exhausting. No mine
water drainage was apparent at any of the sites, and most of the mines appear
to have collapsed or are flooded.
G.I.3 Texas
Compared to some other western states, the uranium production of south
Texas is relatively insignificant, comprising 5 percent of the current United
States annual total. However, the relative impact of the mining operations
is of interest herein for several reasons: 1) geographic concentration of
the actual mine operations, 2) close proximity of the mines to the general
population, 3) effect of the high precipitation of the region on the rela-
tively abundant toxic trace elements in the uranium ore and overburden, and
4) minimal land reclamation of some of the older mines which produced high
grade ore. The location of uranium ore deposits in south Texas can be
readily estimated from the mine locations shown in Fig. 2.4. The deposits
-------
Table 6.2 Inactive uranium mine sites surveyed in New Mexico
Mine
Township and Range
Description
Anaconda F-33
Barbara Jane 1
Barbara Jane 3
Beacon Hill
Dakota
Davenport
Dog Mine
Dysart 1
T12N R9W Sect. 33 and 34
T13N R19W Sect. 30
T13N R19W Sect. 30
T13N R9W Sect. 20
T13N R10W Sect.4
T13N R9W Sect. 20
T13N R9W Sect.20
T14N R10W Sect. 11
Two portals sealed by steel doors, large waste piles,
no water, runoff apparent, no vents found.
No head frame, portal covered by steel plate, but open.
Shaft appears to be open, no water, relatively small
waste pile, runoff from waste pile, three open mine
vents and one capped. Surveys completed at this site.
Head frame remains, portal covered by steel plate but
openings. Shaft appears to have collapsed. Water
drainage from active mine flows through area, small
waste piles cleaned off to surface. Several (about
six) cased mine vents open to surface.
Small head frame, incline shaft is collapsed. Waste
piles in area, no water but runoff apparent. No
vents found.
Two open portals but mine not deep. Some waste
piles, no vents found, no water, runoff apparent.
Open incline but roof collapsed about 60 yards into
mine. No vents found. Waste piles in area, no water,
runoff apparent. Surveys completed at this site.
Head frame, incline shaft sealed but appears to have
collapsed. No vents found. Large water drainage
ditch, large waste piles, runoff apparent.
Head frame and buildings, open vents but used in
nearby active mine system, waste piles, no water,
no runoff.
CD
ro
-------
Table G.2 (continued)
Mine
fownship and Range
Description
Flat Top
Flea Mine
Hogan
Malpais
Marquez
Mesa Top
Poison Canyon
Strip Mines
San Mateo
T13N R9W Sect. 30
T13N R9W Sect. 20
T13N R9W Sect. 14
T13N R9W Sect. 20
T13N R9W Sect. 23
T13N R9W Sect. 20
T13N R10W Sects. 25, 26 and 139
T13N R8W Sect. 30
No head frame, timber and concrete slab over shaft.
No water, waste pile cleaned to surface. No runoff.
Several open mine vents found nearby.
No head frame, portal sealed with timber. No vents.
No water but runoff apparent. Large waste piles.
No head frame, concrete pad covers shaft. No vents
found, no water. Waste cleaned to surface, no runoff.
Mine shaft not found but believed to be covered by
waste piles. No water but runoff apparent.
Building, portal sealed with timber, several open
vents. San Mateo Creek flows through site. Waste
piles and water runoff.
No head frame, shaft sealed with timber but open,
large waste piles. Several open mine vents in area.
No water runoff apparent. Surveys completed at this
site.
Open pit or strip mining areas. No shafts or buildings,
extensive waste piles and numerous pits, no vents. One
abandoned water well, rain water in one pit. Runoff
apparent, creek flows between several waste piles in
Section 25. Surveys completed at this site.
No head frame, shaft area collapsed. Large waste piles.
Heap leach pile, mine water drainage areas. No water,
extensive runoff. One open vent found. Surveys com-
pleted at this site.
ro
-------
Table G.2 (continued)
Township and Range
Description
Santa Fe
Westvaco
T13N R9W Sect. 24
T13N R10W Sect. 25
Zia Strip Mines T12N R9W Sect. 15
Head frame and building, waste cleaned to surface. No
water, no runoff, no vents found.
No head frame, portal caved in to form hole, no vents
found. Small waste pile, no water, runoff apparent.
Shallow strip mining areas, no shafts or buildings.
Waste piles, no water, no runoff apparent, no vents.
CD
ro
co
-------
G-24
are in tuffaceous, zeolitic sandstone and mudstone beds that strike north
eastward and dip gently southeastward (Ea75). Uranium is produced from a
three-county area comprised of Karnes, Live Oak, and Duval counties. In each
area the host rock is different and ranges in age from Eocene to Pliocene.
The Catahoula Tuff is believed by many authors to be the principal source
rock for uranium and other elements in the deposits.
Uranium ores currently mined in south Texas are generally of very low
grade, the average being about 0.06 percent U30g. In the recent past many
operations, now inactive, were mining ore of the range 0.20-0.25 percent
U000. The ore zone thickness, although variable, is seldom more than 3.05 m.
0 O
The usual mining method is by open pit, however, in situ leaching is becoming
commonplace and useful under certain conditions. Mine size and geometry are
variable, depending on the period of mining activity, the depth of the ore
zone, and the proximity (vertically and laterally) of other ore bodies. Many
of the mines have a linear trend, paralleling the mineralized roll front. A
typical open pit mine would be 30-100 m deep and cover approximately 250,000
2
m . Currently, a stripping ratio of 35:1 is followed in this area. Any
groundwater encountered is diverted to sumps and, from there, pumped to
holding ponds.
The reclamation of the pit areas involves contouring the land surface
such that all drainage is internal to an on-site holding pond. Topsoil cover
is spread about evenly and then seeded with various grasses. It is un-
economical to backfill all of the overburden into the pits and, consequently,
some pit remnants consisting of steep walls, etc. are usually left.
Generally, reduced agricultural and grazing productivity can be expected in
the immediate area of the pit and overburden piles, particularly in the case
of older mines.
In situ leaching is common when the depth, size, water content, etc. of
the ore body prevents economical open pit mining. It is carefully controlled
by the State, especially with respect to monitoring requirements. With
cessation of leaching it should be noted that local baseline water quality'of
the mined aquifer is never fully attained. Potential problem areas are
locally increased mobility of trace metals and elevated ammonia levels in the
s
leached ore zone. Tailings from in situ leaching operations can be stored on
site or transferred to mill tailings piles.
-------
G-25
A compilation of both active and inactive mines by location (county) and
type of operation is presented in Table G.3 and Fig. 2.4, both of which are
based on State data (Co78).
Table 6.3 Status and location of uranium mines in Texas
County
Karnes
Karnes-Gonzales
Karnes-Atascosa
Gonzales
Atascosa
Bee
Live Oak
Duval
Webb-Duval
Webb
Open Pit(a)
A I P
8 35 9
2
1
1
1
6 8
1
In Situ Leachinq(a)
A I P
1
6
2 5
1
1
Total
52
2
1
1
1
1
20
8
1
1
Total
19
44
11
88
'A = active; I = inactive; P = planned,
G.I.3.1 Field Surveys
On May 24-30, 1979, active and inactive open pit uranium mines in Karnes
County, Texas were visited in the company of Texas Health Department radi-
ation specialists. The survey included mine wastes and pits in varying
stagesactive-mining underway, inactive-being reclaimed, inactive-reclaimed,
and inactive-abandoned without reclamation. A gamma survey was conducted at
one open pit mine that had just been regraded and covered with topsoil but
not yet reseeded. The field survey results were supplemented with extensive
gamma survey and environmental monitoring results from the Texas Health
Department and the Texas Railroad Commission.
-------
G-26
Uranium mining in Texas involves considerable and successive description
of the land surface as ore bodies are first uncovered and then removed.
Tremendous volumes of topsoil, overburden, and water must be relocated a
number of times in the course of mining. Dewatering has reached the stage
where off-site release is becoming necessary. In the past, mine waters were
rarely discharged but were stored in temporary basins on site. Occasionally,
mine water was pumped to stock ponds to augment other supplies, typically
derived from rainfall runoff. Water quality had to meet accepted standards
for stock use.
Figures G.16 and G.17 are of a typical large open pit mine in Texas as
of 1972 and 1978. Note the extensive changes in the landscape as unmined
land is stripped, mined, and then reclaimed. Much of the overburden is left
adjacent to the mines, and standing water remains in most pits. The water
originates as groundwater seepage and overland flow from precipitation. The
Galen mine, in the right foreground, was abandoned without stabilization
about 10 years ago. Natural vegetation is very thin owing to the lack of
topsoil and probable toxic effects of trace elements in the wastes. The pile
is deeply eroded in places as was shown previously in Figs. 6.10 and 6.11.
Current Texas requirements for stabilization specify that the gamma
radiation dose rate must be no more than 0.5 rem per year. For continuous
exposure, this corresponds to 57 u R/hr above background (about 5 pR/hr).
Results of 21 mine surveys in Texas (Co77) indicated that gamma-ray exposures
in excess of 62 pR/hr were found at 16 of the mines surveyed. Contributing
causes are mineralized overburden (15 of 16), ore pads not properly decon-
taminated (8 of 16), and mineralized rock in the pit (4 of 16).
G.I.3.2 Summary
In summary, uranium mining has caused radiation levels at some abandoned
uranium mines to exceed natural background levels. On approximately
one-tenth of the mined area of south Texas, exposure rates could exceed
60 vR/hr (the equivalent of 0.5 rem per year for continuous exposure). Al-
though no one is believed to be receiving an exposure in excess of 0.5 rem
per year now, the area being mined is .increasing, and so is the State's
population; hence, the potential for increased population exposures is be-
coming greater. Individuals occupying a dwelling built on abandoned mine
-------
G-27
Figure G.16 1972 aerial photograph of the Galen and Pawelek open pit
mines, Karnes County, Texas
Figure G.17 1978 aerial photograph of the Galen and Pawelek open pit
mines, Karnes County, Texas
-------
G-28
areas could receive excessive lung exposures from radon and its progeny, as
well as gamma ray exposures exceeding 0.5 rem per year.
Reclamation by the mining company can reduce radiation levels on mines.
One of the most effective methods is to fill in the pit area with the re-
maining ore, sub-ore, and overburden material and then cover this area with
natural dirt or rock of low radioactivity content.
G.I.4 Wyoming
The second largest producer of uranium in the United States is Wyoming.
With higher uranium prices, the mining of many low-grade ore deposits would
become economical, classifying Wyoming as the largest uranium reserve in the
United States. Currently there are many new and expanded operations being
planned. Both surface and underground mining methods are used; however, in
situ leaching is also underway. Generally, the ore host rocks are arkosic
sandstones and conglomerates. Currently, unoxidized ores are being mined,
whereas, in the past, shallow oxidized ore bodies were worked. As a result,
newer mines are discharging considerably more water to formerly ephemeral
streams and, in one case, to a dry lake bed. Within Wyoming, there are 14
major uranium districts, 4 of which are currently producing. These four
districts, which are detailed below, exemplify the overall geology of Wyoming
uranium occurrences.
G.I.4.1 Highland Flats - Box Creek District
Currently, the largest producing area is the Highland Flats - Box Creek
district, located in central Converse County. Host rocks for this deposit
are arkosic sandstones of fluvial origin lying within the Fort Union For-
mation. The ore occurs in roll-type, tabular, and dish-shaped deposits. The
largest and most significant of these are the roll-type deposits, varying
between 1.5 m and 6.1 m thick. All types are generally associated with each
other, occurring from about 46-91 m below the land surface. The ore grade
ranges from 0.1 to 0.15 percent U30g. Former mining operations in this area
were in the overlying Wasatch Formation and produced ore of approximately
0.22 percent U30g.
-------
G-29
G.I.4.2 Crooks Gap District
The second largest producer of uranium, the Crooks Gap district, is
located in the Green Mountains of Fremont County. Operations began there in
1954. The host rocks are arkosic sandstones in the Battle Spring Formation.
The ore bodies are of tabular, stratiform, and roll-type occurrence modes and
are concentrated in narrow zones at the margins of the altered sandstone.
Those currently mined are at or below the water table and are unoxidized.
Ore grade ranges from 0.18 to 0.23 percent U30g. Formerly, smaller,
near-surface ore bodies were mined.
G.I.4.3 Gas Hills District
The Gas Hills district has produced the most uranium in Wyoming and has
the largest number of mine and mill operations. Large-scale continuous pro-
duction has occurred since 1960. It is located in eastern Fremont County.
The host rocks are arkosic sandstones in the Wind River Formation. Within
this region there are four types of deposits, the roll-type being the most
important. These are found at depths of about 30 m to 150 m below the
surface and up to 122 m below the water table. The ore zones are 0.3 m to
3.1 m thick, occasionally ranging from 6 m to 10 m thick. The current ore
grade is approximately 0.1 to 0.15 percent lUGg. Also within the district
are small, high-grade residual deposits behind the main solution front
deposits.
G.I.4.4 Shirley Basin District
The Shirley Basin district in northwest Carbon County has been actively
mined since 1960 and is expected to expand considerably. The host rocks are
arkosic sandstones within the Wind River Formation and the deposits are of
the roll-type. Found at the leading edge of the tongue of the roll-front,
the ore bodies tend to be large, about 15 m wide by 760 m long. Smaller ore
bodies are found along the top and bottom of the roll-front. Overall, the
ore bodies vary from a few hundred to a few thousand MT, at depths from 45 m
to 90 m below the surface. Main ore bodies lie below the groundwater table,
sometimes to depths of 90 m. The ore grade ranges from 0.2 to 0.6 percent
U3°8-
-------
G-30
G.I.4.5 Summary
Approximately 90 percent of the ore produced comes from surface mining
operations. Overburden thickness ranges from 30.5 m to 137 m below ground
3 3
surface. Spoils bank accumulation is on the order of 764 x 10 m /month for
an average lifetime of 15 years. This material is stockpiled for later
reclamation pursuant to the State Environmental Quality Act of 1973; however,
to date, land reclamation has not begun at any surface mine site. It is
evident that the mine waste volume from an underground mining operation is
much less than that generated by an open pit mine; therefore, it is estimated
that about two hectares per portal would be sufficient to dispose of the
waste rock.
The majority of the inactive mines are located in the Gas Hills and
Shirley Basin mining districts, located in Fremont and Carbon Counties,
respectively (Personal communication with UNC staff 1979). There are some
inactive but not abandoned mines at every production area. Any increase in
the value of ILOg will lead to the reopening of many mines. Therefore, it is
difficult to select an inactive mine that would be considered abandoned
(mined out).
The Morton Ranch leasehold, described as typical of smaller inactive and
perhaps abandoned operations, was the site of the radiological survey. The
topographical and climatological parameters of the area are similar in
practically any portion of central Wyoming. Precipitation ranges from 30 cm
to 36 cm per year, with June being the wettest month, November the driest.
The wind blows constantly at variable frequencies up to 129 km/hr (NUREG
0438). The topography is dominated by plains, low-lying hills, and table
lands interrupted by stream channel ways.
In 1973, an inactive pit, 1601, was very briefly mined to determine the
metallurgical qualities of the underlying ore. A pit 110 m x 238 m x 12.2 m
deep remains. Adjacent to the pit, piles containing 237,000 m3 [73,000 m of
ore and 164,000 m of spoil (sub-ore)J of spoil material occupies less than
2.5 hectares.
Results of the gamma survey performed along radials originating from the
center of the pit appear in Fig. G.18. The near-surface ore body complicated
field results from the survey; therefore, soil samples were taken at every
366 m to determine the presence of wind-blown material or surface ore
outcropping. Additional soil samples, 75 cm profiles, were taken at
erosional occurrences and in drainages.
-------
13.9
14.1
15.3
13.9
14.9
14.5
14.6 14.4 15.2 15.1/16.8
13.9
15.4
14.9
23;1 58.9 \22.0 22.4*^22.0 18.6 18.3 17.3 17.016.116.2 16.0 15.6 13.2
\
I
/
/
/
54.2
16.9
17.9
17.0 /
^, 15.3
15.4
GROSS GAMMA EXPOSURE RATE uR/hr
Figure G.18 Results of gamma exposure rate survey at the 1601 pit and environs, Morton Ranch uranium mine,
Converse County, Wyoming
o
-------
G-32
G.2 Aqueous Transport of Mining Wastes in New Mexico and Wyoming
G.2.1 Description of Field Studies
Field studies were conducted to investigate the transport of trace
elements and radionuclides from inactive mining areas to off-site locations
in New Mexico and Wyoming. These areas were selected because extensive
uranium mining has occurred to date and is likely to continue. Since the
mid 1950's, these States have produced the majority of domestic U30g.
Samples of surface soils, stream sediments, mine drainage water, and
surface water were collected. Interpretation of the data is complex since
wind and water erosion work together at different seasons of the year to
transport the mine material stored above ground. Compounding the problem is
the semiarid environment of Wyoming and New Mexico where precipitation
averages 13 to 31 centimeters per year and occurs primarily in the spring.
The short-duration "flash flood" summer thundershower will move large
quantities of material in increments rather than a gradual erosional pattern.
Sampling was conducted during April and May 1979 at a site within the
South Powder River Basin in Wyoming, at two sites in Poison Canyon drainage,
and at the San Mateo mine areas in New Mexico. Most of the soil samples were
obtained in well-defined runoff gullies where mine and mine spoil drainage
intersected stream beds. The arid nature of the locations did not provide
much opportunity to observe and to measure surface runoff characteristics.
Sampling locations at the Morton Ranch property in Wyoming are
summarized in Fig. G.19. The types of samples are identified in the legend.
Samples taken at the San Mateo mine in New Mexico are depicted in Fig. G.20.
At three locations at Morton Ranch, a 75 cm profile was taken which
consisted of 15 consecutive 5 cm segments. The potential variability of
trace metals and radionuclides at depth may be related to the solubility of
the species and the amount of surface water residence time. Understanding
the fractionation of surface contaminants in the soil column is important in
evaluating the transport of various species by redissolution or leaching.
-------
G-33
LEGEND:
W - Water
S - Soil
7 G - Stream Sediment
> P - 76 cm soil profile
0200
1000
2000
Meters
Figure G.19 Location of sampling sites at the Morton Ranch mine. South Powder River Basin, Wyoming.
-------
G-34
103
Heap Leach 105
Pond (Dry) X^
106
Figure G.20 Sample locations for radionuclides and select trace metals in
sediments, San Mateo Mine, New Mexico
-------
G-35
G.2.2 Discussion of Results
The radiochemical and trace metal analyses for the stations shown in
Fig. G.19 are contained in Tables G.4, G.5, G.6, and 6.7 (Written Communication
from N.A. Wogman, Battelle Pacific Northwest Laboratory, 1979).
Table G.4 Trace elements and radionuclides in water in the South Fork of Box
Creek drainage at UNC Morton Ranch lease
pCiA.
_yj
Location ^
W-3 H20
Filter
W-5 H20
Filter
W-6 H20
Filter
W-7 H20
Filter
W-4 H20
Filter
Acid Blank H20
Filter
Ra-226
15.5
18.7
4.2
4.48
0.6
0.091
0.5
0.18
0.13
0.045
N.D.
0.59
U-238
1220
33.7
287
2.97
34.2
0.209
38.7
0.976
10.9
0.188
N.D.
0.073
Ba
63
22
76
16
11
<4
86
4
44
<3
1
<3
Se
334
38
78
0.6
<4
<.l
<4
<.l
<4
<.l
<4
<.12
V
8
47
5
8.1
10
<.6
7
1.0
6
1.7
<5
<.4
Mn
77
22
9
29
91
11
22
18
149
6.7
<3
<.2
(a)
See Figure G.19.
Note. -- United Nuclear Corporation (UNC) has recently transferred its
interest to the Tennessee Valley Authority.
-------
G-36
Table G.5 Radionuclides and trace metals in sediments in the South Fork of
Box Creek at UNC Morton Ranch lease
pCi/g uq/q
Location^9'
6-1
6-2
6-3
6-4
6-5
Ra-226
1.3
1.8
6.8
1.4
1.2
U-238
0.41
1.04
7.46
1.45
0.87
Ba
750
690
550
750
720
Se V
<1 <39
<1 <42
7 90
<1 <51
<1 <50
Mn
70
114
3390
100
107
As
< 1.6
2.9
10
<1.7
3.4
Figure G.19.
The results in Tables G.4 through G.7 may indicate dispersal patterns of mine
drainage and waste in a semiarid environment. Intermittent runoff from
surface or underground mining spoils or an irregular low-volume discharge of
mine water compounds the difficulty in attributing the impacts to either
suspended or dissolved species. The analyses performed on samples from the
South Fork of Box Creek cannot be used to describe typical impacts from
larger operations; yet the complexity of stream sedimentation and dilution is
evident and can signal precautions in monitoring any site of mining
operation.
For instance, water samples collected from Box Creek represent an inter-
mittently flowing stream without a constant mine discharge. Even in spring
after most of the snow has melted and recharged the upper reaches, streams
such as Box Creek do not flow but rather contain shallow impoundments. There
seems to be a movement of water beneath the stream sediments which supports
these impoundments without observable surface flow. Each of the water and
sediment samples was from impoundments, except for sediment sample G-l which
was from a dry stream bed. The results in Table G.4 show that radium-226 and
uranium-238 in solution decrease in concentration with downstream distance.
Station W-3 is hydrologically separate from the drainage basin at the present
time, but represents mine discharge when dewatering begins.
-------
G-37
Table G.6 Radionuclides and trace metals in soils near the 1601 open pit
mine, UNC Morton Ranch lease, Wyoming
Location^0
S-l
S-2
S-3
S-4
S-5
s-6
S-7
pCi /g v g/g
l) Ra-226
119
33
3
1
2
1
3
.8
.9
.5
.86
.4
U-238
188
7
1
1
1
1
1
.21
.87
.78
.64
.62
.60
Th-230
161
38
3
3
1
1
2
.6
.71
.54
.91
.74
.71
Ba
760
800
760
530
810
680
570
Mn
205
250
200
190
140
180
180
V
110
160
70
100
<50
100
70
Zn
29
85
36
58
27
33
32
Se As
17 7.5
25 11
<1 6.8
<1 6.0
<1 4.2
<1 3.9
<1 5.6
Figure G.19.
^ 'Background sample.
In conjunction with the decreasing soluble species with distance down-
stream, there is a possible trend of increased levels in sediments (see Table
G.5). This may be, in part, due to the sampling locations (ponded water).
It is possible that the soluble species precipitate in standing water either
because of evaporation increasing the solute concentration or the increase in
pH. The pH of the 1704 mine water increased from 5.2 to 7.2 eight km down-
stream in Box Creek. Another possibility is that these ponds receive surface
runoff from several hundred meters of stream bed and, therefore, have higher
sediment loading.
The data in Table G.6 are from a series of soil samples obtained from
the natural drainage leading from the inactive 1601 open pit to the South
Fork of Box Creek. This mine is dry and therefore it has no liquid discharge
to Box Creek. Over 1,100 m separate the mine spoils material from the creek
bank. The soil samples were collected at 183, 366, 567, and 1,100 m from the
spoils bank. If there had been runoff from cloudbursts or snow melt, sheet
erosion across this plane could move the spoils material to the creek. This
mine was operated for a very short time eight years ago; therefore, the full
-------
G-38
impact of the long-term erosion could not be measured. Also, wind erosion
complicates the predictive value of these results since this channel is
aligned with the predominant wind direction.
Table G.7 Radionuclides and trace metals in soil profiles at the open pit
mines, UNC Morton Ranch lease, Wyoming
Location^
P-l
P-Z
P-3
Depth
(cm)
0-2
4-6
10-12
22-24
28-30
0-2
4-6
10-12
22-24
28-30
0-2
4-6
10-12
22-24
28-30
U-238
188
1.62
2.12
1.21
1.26
11.0
5.39
1.57
11.0
5.73
3.3
3.0
2.69
1.97
3.51
pCi/g
Ra-226
119
2.8
1.8
1.4
1.5
33.2
13.0
2.6
146
485
8.2
52.0
1.86
1.62
2.1
Th-230
161
1.79
1.87
1.0
1.16
31.4
18.0
2.15
238
481
5.5
11.1
1.35
1.78
1.5
Mn
205
120
59
86
57
130
94
130
190
72
120
110
210
270
350
yg/g
Se
17
1.2
<1
1.9
^
2.7
1.1
<1
1.3
-------
G-39
the background samples can be attributed either to wind or water erosion from
the 1601 spoils bank.
Water erosion of the mine waste pile is documented by the gullying scars
on the sloped surfaces. Data in Table 6.6 indicate definite migration of
this material at least 360 m from the largest gully. Yet it is possible that
this contamination may have occurred while the mine was active. The ore body
is sandstone, the fines of which could be resuspended by vehicle traffic or
equipment operation.
In Fig. G.20 the drainage pattern for the San Mateo mine in New Mexico
is depicted. As in the case of the 1601 mine in Wyoming, nearby drainage
courses are dry most of the year. Runoff in San Mateo Creek lasts for
several months as a result of snow melt, and is nil the rest of the year,
except for brief runoff from storms. Radium-226 data for the sediments (see
Table G.8) reflect decreasing concentration with distance to San Mateo Creek,
especially within 350 to 460 m from the waste pile. The radium in San Mateo
Creek downstream from the intersection of the mine drainage is higher than
the gully data would indicate. Data for sample 104 seem to indicate that
contamination has not moved from the gully wash to the creek beds, but this
is considered most unlikely on the basis of known erosion and obvious
topographic relations.
Barium and selenium trends, for the most part, follow a similar pattern
of decreasing concentration with distance from the waste pile. Arsenic
concentrations are an exception. Sediments show increasing arsenic to 350 to
460 m downstream and then decrease from that point to San Mateo Creek. In the
creek sediments, arsenic and barium concentrations are higher than would be
expected if mine wastes were the sole source of these elements.
Sediment and water samples (Tables G.8 and G.9, respectively) from San
Mateo Creek indicate that barium and manganese concentrations are either
equal to or higher upstream of the gulley intersection than below it. This
apparent anomaly and the higher-than-expected concentrations for radium and
arsenic in sediments cannot be readily explained.
In summary, the data collected during April and May 1979 at the San
Mateo mine do not indicate that mine waste has reached San Mateo Creek; yet
downstream sediments show anomalies for certain elements. The transport of
mine waste is measurable approximately 370 to 460 meters from the waste pile.
-------
G-40
Water erosion is the likely reason for the contamination, but wind may also
be dispersing material. Meteorological data, particularly wind roses, are
unavailable at this time.
Table G.8 Radionuclides and trace metals in sediments from the drainage of
the San Mateo mine and from San Mateo Creek, New Mexico
pCi/g
Location^ R3'226
98 117
100 55
101 36
103 1.6
104 0.77
105 1.2
102 0.77
109 0.38
108 8.1
(a)See Figure G.
Table G.9 Radium-226
San Mateo
Location^3'
23 (upstream)
21 (downstream)
Th-232
0.86
0.64
0.66
0.43
0.54
0.80
0.55
0.39
0.53
20.
and trace
Ba Se
-
566 3.9
484 3.7
383 1.2
434 <1
517 <1
562 1.2
695 <1
597 <1
elements in
yg/g
V
-
78
114
<50
<42
<52
102
<51
55
water
Mn
-
176
179
191
146
186
473
152
157
from San
As Remarks
Waste pile
3.1 Base of pile
5.1 100 m from
pile
6.2 400-500 m
from pile
3.6 .600-700 m
from pile
3.8 Heap leach
pile
5.5 Background
2.2 2 km
upstream
5.2 Downstream
Mateo Creek near
mine discharge point
Ra-226
12.5
Ba Se
79 <4
26 21
y <
V
8
21
]/ &
Mn
55
10
As Mo Zn
9 23 56
9 170 150
See Figure G.20.
-------
G-41
Data from three soil profiles near the spoils areas of the 1601 and 1704
mines at Morton Ranch were used to investigate possible downward migration of
soluble species. In semi arid environments, small precipitation events
usually result in little noticeable runoff. In many areas, the surface soil
is very porous and rain immediately infiltrates. The disturbed spoils
material is probably of even higher porosity; therefore, soluble species
could, over a period of time, begin to migrate to greater depths. Based upon
solubility and frequency of rewetting, a fractionation of species could
occur.
The overburden at 1601 and 1704 mines contains a high percentage of
clay. The resultant spoils bank is a homogeneous mixture of clay and sand-
stone. It was observed during the collection of the soil samples that the
clay was moist, highly plastic, and obviously of low permeability. Very slow
downward migration of surface water would be expected; consequently, not much
fractionation of the species would result.
The results in Table 6.7, however, show contradictory evidence of
isotopic disequilibrium. The isotopes of uranium, radium, and thorium are
near equilibrium conditions throughout the profile P-l taken above the slope
of the 1601 spoils bank. However, the lower layers of profile P-2 show a
marked departure of uranium from the radium and thorium. Since uranium is
more soluble than the other species, it is difficult to explain the anomaly.
In profile number 1, the top segment probably contains ore material
eroded to the spoil surface. The segments at greater depth show species
equal to or less than the data reported as background on the surface in Table
6.6 (S-6). This would imply that no downward migration had occurred on the
surface of the spoils area. Note that the clay-like matrix of the spoils may
have prevented much surface infiltration, which accounts for the shallow
erosional scars on horizontal surfaces.
Profile number 2 was obtained in an alluvial fan below the spoil bank
slope. The data suggest that the profile did not extend below the alluvium
and into the spoil material. The anomaly at greater depth cannot be
explained, but, perhaps, irregular wind and water erosion of the spoils
material caused this layering effect. Still, the isotopic disequilibrium is
not explained.
-------
G-42
Profile number 3 was a saturated clay column which contained, from the
odor, a percentage of organic material that was undergoing bacterial decompo-
sition. Sheep in the area use the pond nearby and this may account for the
source of the organics. The results for profile 3, again, show little above
background concentrations at greater depth, except for slight increases in
manganese, selenium, and uranium. The profile was in the sediments of Box
Creek close to the runoff observed from the 1704 spoils bank. The radium and
uranium data show that concentrations in sediments in the first 30 cm are
higher than what was observed further downstream at point G-2 (Table G.5).
This is undoubtedly the result of erosion from the spoils bank. This clay
sediment matrix could be subject to transport further down Box Creek but only
under high flow conditions.
G.2.3 Conclusions
In summary, the field studies attempted to identify and quantify the
transport of mine spoils material. There is evidence that contamination is
measurable up to 370 to 460 m in a gully draining the San Mateo pile and,
perhaps, 570 m in the natural sloping plane in which the 1601 Morton Ranch
mine waste is located. The mechanism of transport is complex because of the
semiarid environments. There is a good chance of wind and water erosion
combining to move spoils material these distances in under 10 years.
The data also support the conclusion that it is not evident that radio-
nuclides or trace metal species have reached intermittent streams, either as
soluble or particulate material. Anomalies were uncovered in San Mateo creek
which cannot be explained from the samples collected so far. The water and
sediment samples in the South Fork of Box Creek show decreasing concen-
trations of radium and uranium isotopes with downstream distance, but not so
clearly for the trace metals. The levels of radium and uranium are not con-
clusive of major off-site movement of the spoils material.
The soil profiles obtained at the Morton Ranch leasehold do not support
the conjecture of downward migration. Perhaps the clay-like consistency of
the spoils material allows for too little fractionation after only eight
years. The isotopic ratio discrepancy at greater depth in the profile of an
alluvial fan of spoils is not understood at this time.
-------
G-43
6.3 References
Bu56 Butler, A., Schnabel R., 1956, "Distribution and General Features of
Uranium Occurrences in the United States," Geological Survey Professional
Paper No. 300.
Co77 Cook, L.M., Caskey, B.W., and Wukasch, M., 1977, "The Effect of
Uranium Mining on Environmental Gamma Ray Exposures," in Proceedings
IRPA IV International Congress, Paris, April 24-30, pp. 1029-1032.
Co78 Cook, L.M. 1978, "The Uranium District of the Texas Gulf Coastal
Plain," Texas Department of Health, Austin, Texas.
Da59 Dare, W., 1959, "Uranium-Mining Practices and Costs at Ten Salt Wash
Lease Operations of Union Carbide Nuclear Co.," Bureau of Mines Infor-
mation circular 7972.
Ea75 Eargle, D.H., Dickinson, K.A., and Davis, B.O., 1975, "South Texas
Uranium Deposits," American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin,
volume 59, number 5, May 1975.
Si56 Sims, P., Tooker, E., 1956, "Pitchblende Deposits in the Central
City District and Adjoining Areas, Gilpin and Clear Creek Counties,
Colorado." Geological Survey Professional Paper No. 300.
Wh78 White, L., 1978, Engineering and Mining Journal, Vol. 179, p. 25.
-------
APPENDIX H
INFLUENCE OF MINE DRAINAGE ON SEEPAGE TO
GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER OUTFLOW
-------
H-l
H.1.0 Influence of Mine Drainage on Seepage to Groundwater and Surface
Water Outflow
H.I.I. Surface Mines
Mine water discharge from each open pit mine in the Wyoming model area
3
is estimated to be 3.00 m /min. Discharge is to natural ephemeral streams
which will, in some cases, become perennial as a result of the discharge.
Effects of mine drainage on water quality, stream biota, and downstream
potable water uses are largely a result of dilution of suspended and
dissolved load. The first step in the analysis is to determine what the net
outflow of water from the sub-basin will be and then to route this water
downstream where contact with man or the food chain is possible. It is
assumed that suspended and dissolved chemical loads not leaving the sub-basin
because of infiltration and evaporation remain on the stream bed and are
available for subsequent transport in flood flows, which are calculated in
Section 3.3.3.
Numerous assumptions are made in the analysis to follow, which is
patterned after that in NUREG-0511 (Generic Environmental Impact Statement on
Uranium Milling), with certain corrections and modifications. The calcu-
lations are based on the operation of three surface mines dewatering at a
33 ?
rate of 9.00 m /min (3 mines, 3.00 m /min each) into a sub-basin of 11.4 km
area. This will transform 22.7 kilometers of channel (in the sub-basin and
3
basin) into perennial streams. Note that 7.04 m /min will discharge from the
3
sub-basin. The remainder of the flow (1.96 m /min) is lost by infiltration
and seepage in the sub-basin.
Mine discharge is assumed to enter into a hydrographic area described as
follows (Table H.I) and shown in Fig. H.I:
-------
H-2
Table H.I Characteristics of the sub-basin containing the model mines
Slope of region
Substrate hydraulic conductivity (vertical)
Substrate hydraulic conductivity (horizontal)
Composite hydraulic conductivity
Total outflow of a stream section
Total loss due to infiltration (seepage) and
evaporation
Seepage loss
Evaporative loss
Annual evaporation rate
Length of stream section
Reach of stream section with perennial flow
Channel dimensions (see Figure H.2)
Cross sectional area of channel calculated
from Q. and V
Water input from mine drainage
Wetted perimeter of stream bed
Velocity of flow
K = (Kh.Ky)1/2
= (6 x 10"6 x 6 x 10"4)1/2
= 6 x 10" m/min
QL-
-------
H-3
O = Section #
I = Mine
Figure H.1 Wyoming model area sub-basin drainage system
T«-**x^
Channel and Floodplain
Area of discharge
Figure H.2 Model area stream cross section
-------
H-4
To find the total outflow (QT) from a stream section of length L:
= -KB- Ea
/dQT = -(KB + Ea) /dL
QT = -(KB + Ea)L + C
At L = 0, QT = Qin, so C = Qin:
QT = Qin -(KB + Ea)L
To find the total loss (Q, ) associated with a stream of length L:
Since QT = Qin - QL»
QL = (KB + Ea)L
A = a x b
Assuming a ratio of b/a = 0.01,
a =
B = 1.02a
so QL = (1.02 K + E) ai_
= [(1.02 (6 x 10"5 m/min)) + (2 x 10"6 m/min)]ai_
= (6.32 x 10"5 m/min)aL
= (6,32 x 10 m/mtn}
DT36
To find the reach (ft) of perennial stream created by discharge (if there is
no net outflow from the section):
If QT = 0 then 0 = Q. -(KB + Ea)L
I , Q in
'in
LQ = ° ~ R " 1 KB + Ea
Assuming a ratio of b/a = 0..01,
a=
0.36
B =1.02
-------
H-5
5jn = J°'36 Qin) = 9493.67 x ql/2
. r in
(1.02K + E) / wii
07151
The basin drainage channels are assumed to be considerably larger than those
of the sub-basin and therefore effect a greater evaporation and seepage loss
on the system. Consequently, loss rates due to seepage were doubled, pro-
ducing the following equations for estimating flows within the basin channels:
QL = (1.24 x 10"4 m/min)
,-4 " 1/2
'in
TJ736J
R = 4823.15 x Q^2
Table H.2 contains the calculations of seepage and evaporation loss
and cumulative discharge for the sub-basin and contiguous areas of the basin.
Infiltration of mine discharge to ephemeral streams was not calculated
separately but instead was solved as a combined loss for evaporation and in-
filtration. Both losses are a function of surface area. Infiltration takes
place in both the sub-basin and the basin and at different rates. The final
calculated infiltration percentage represents a combination of the sub-basin
and basin losses, which were calculated separately. When 3 mines are
operating, the full reach of perennial stream created is 22.7 km.
Infiltration losses in the sub-basin can be calculated as follows:
QL = [1.02 (6 x 10"5) + (2 x 10"6)] aL (H.I)
where Q. = flow rate or loss as infiltration plus evaporation, m /min
a = width of stream, meters
L = length of stream, meters
Q = 6.12 x 10"5 x aL
3
= infiltration loss, m /min
Q0 = 2.0 x 10"6 x aL
3
= evaporation loss, m /min
-------
Table H.2 Seepage and outflow calculations for the Wyoming model mine drainage system
Section
Number*3'
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Basin
Section Length
L (m)
2400
2100
600
3000
1400
1600
900
141000
Qin(3.00 m3/min
per mine)
3.00
3.00
3.00
7.04
Total Q.n
(m3/min)
3.00
2.56
3.00
4.91
3.00
7.30
7.04
(m3/min)
0.44
0.10
0.55
0.33
0.29
0.26
7.04
Q. - Q. R
(m3/min) (m)
2.56
2.46
2.45
4.59
2.71
7.04
12797
Cumulative
Discharge
(m /min)
7.04
0
(a)
See Fig. H.I.
cr>
-------
H-7
Therefore, Qc
= 30.6 (H-2)
Since total loss = Qs + Qe = 1.96 m3/min
and Qs = Qe x 30.6
then Q = 1.96 - Qo and Q = 1.96 = 0.062 m3/min
a c e -
31.6
Then loss due to infiltration in the sub-basin:
= 1.96 - 0.062
= 1.898 m3/min
Infiltration losses in the basin can be calculated as follows:
QL = [1.02 (1.2 x 10"4) + (2 + 10"6)] aL (H.3)
where Qg = 1.22 x 10"4 x aL
Qe = 2 x 10"6 x aL
Therefore, s = 61.0
Total Loss = Qs + Qe = 7.04 m /min
Then loss due to infiltration in the basin:
= 7.04 - 0.114
= 6.926 m3/min
3 /" -3
Therefore, total inflow equals 9 m /min or 4.73 x 10 m /yr, and total annual
6 3
infiltration loss equals 4.65 x 10 m . Restated, 98.2 percent of the
discharge infiltrates and the remainder evaporates.
-------
H-8
H.I.2 Underground Mines
Mine water discharge from underground mines in the New Mexico model area
3
averages slightly under 2 m /min. Flow characteristics parallel those in the
Wyoming model area, as does the methodology applied in calculating the
infiltration and evaporation losses and the net outflow. The calculations
3
are based on the operation of 14 mines dewatering at a rate of 28 m /min
3 2
(2.00 m /min per mine) into a sub-basin of 246 km area. This will result in
transformation of 24.8 km of channel (in the sub-basin only) into perennial
streams. Note that there is no discharge from the sub-basin to the basin.
Mine discharge is assumed to enter into a small sub-basin hydrographic
unit shown in Figure H.3. The sub-basin characteristics used as model input
parameters are the same as those for Wyoming (Table H.I) with the exception
of those presented in Table H.3.
Table H.3 Characteristics of the sub-basin hydrographic unit in the model
underground uranium mine area
Parameter
Substrate hydraulic conductivity
Substrate hydraulic conductivity
Substrate hydraulic conductivity
Annual evaporation rate
Water input from mine discharge
Symbol
(vertical) K
(horizontal) K.
K
E
Q-
Value Units
6 x 10"5 m/min
6 x 10" m/min
-4
6 x 10 m/min
4.0 x 10"6 m/min
3
2.00 per mine m/min
-------
H-9
(km)
= Mine location
O= Section number
Figure H.3 New Mexico model area sub-basin drainage system
-------
H-10
The loss and outflow formulas are of the same format and derivation as
the Wyoming equations (see Surface Mines), but have different final forms due
to the change in infiltration and evaporation rates. The final equations for
the New Mexico model area are as follows:
To find the total loss (QL) associated with a stream segment of
length L:
QL = (1.02K + E)aL (H.5)
= [(1.02 (6 x 10"4 m/min)} + (4.0 x 10~6 m/min)] aL
= (6.16 x 10"4 m/min) aL
-4 /O \1/2
= (6.16 x 10 4) Min L
1 0.36 1
To find the reach (R) of perennial stream created by discharge (if
there is no net outflow from the section):
R _ Qin (H.6)
(1.02 K+E)/^1/2
0.36
- (0.36 Qin)1^ ;
(1.02 K + E)
= 974.03 x (Qin)1/2
Since no net outflow from the sub-basin occurs, equations modified for the
basin channel characteristics are not necessary for this model area. Table
H.4 presents the calculations of infiltration and evaporation loss and
cumulative discharge within the sub-basin.
Infiltration of mine discharge to ephemeral streams was not calculated
separately but instead was solved as a combined loss for evaporation and
infiltration. Both losses are a function of surface area. Infiltration
takes place only in the sub-basin as there is no net outflow. When 14 mines
are operating, the full reach of the perennial stream created is 24.8 km.
Infiltration losses can be calculated as follows:
QL = [(1.02 (6 x 10"4)) + (4.0 x 10'6)] aL (H.7)
-------
Table H.4 Seepage and outflow calculations for the New Mexico model mine area drainage system
Section
Number
1
2
3
4
5
6
,7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
Section Length
Km)
1500
200
2300
1000
800
500
3000
3400
1000
700
500
1100
1500
1400
1200
1100
1000
600
1900
2100
3200
2100
1200
3900
1300
4900
Qin (2.00 m3/min
per mine)
2.00
2.00
0
2.00
0
2.00
0
2.00
2.00
0
2.00
0
2.00
0
2.00
0
2.00
2.00
0
0
2.00
2.00
0
2.00
0
0
Total Qin
o
(m /min)
2.00
2.00
1.71
2.00
0.55
2.00
1.27
2.00
2.00
0.55
2.02
1.29
2.00
0.01
2.00
0.26
2.00
2.00
1.68
0
2.00
2.00
0
2.00
0
0
\
(m /min)
0.29
_
1.45
_
0.73
_
-
1.45
0.53
0.73
1.28
_
_
1.74
1.45
0.87
_
w
_
-
_
-
-
~
^in - \
(m3/min)
1.71
-
0.55
_
1.27
_
-
0.55
0.02
1.29
0.01
_
_
0.26
_
0.55
1.13
_
-
_
»
_
-
-
R
(m)
1948
_
1665
_
534
_
1241
1948
-
_
_
_
1948
10
-
251
_
-
1635
M
1948
1948
_
1948
*
w
Cumulative
Discharge
(m /min)
0
(a)
See Fig. H.3.
-------
H-12
3
where QL = flow rate or loss as infiltration plus evaporation, m /min
a = width of stream, meters
L = length of stream, meters
Qc = 6.12 x 10~4 x aL
3
= infiltration loss, m /min
Q = 4.0 x 10"6 x aL
3
= evaporation loss, m /min
Therefore, ^s = 153 (H.8)
Q* "
Since total loss = Q_ + CL = 28 m /min
o G
and Q = Q x 153
s e v . ^po o
then Qs = 28-Qe and Qe = - =0.18 nr/min
Then loss due to infiltration in the sub-basin:
= 28 - 0.18
= 27.82 m3/min
3 73
Therefore, total inflow equals 28.0 m /min or 1.47 x 10 m /yr, and total
7 3
annual infiltration loss equals 1.46 x 10 m . Restated, 99.3 percent of
the discharge infiltrates and the remainder evaporates.
-------
APPENDIX I
COMPUTATION OF MASS EMISSION FACTORS
FOR WIND EROSION
-------
1-1
I.1.0 Computation of Mass Emission Factors for Wind Erosion
Mass emission factors due to wind erosion of overburden, waste rock, and
sub-ore piles were computed by the equation (Hu76)
EF = alKCLV (1-1)
where,
EF = emission factor, MT/hectare-yr,
a = the portion of total wind erosion losses that would be
measured as suspended particulates - a has the value of
0.025 for rocky, gravelly surfaces (Hu76),
I = soil credibility - I has the value of 85 MT/hectare-yr
for rocky, gravelly surfaces (Hu76),
K = surface roughness factor, assumed to be 1.0,*
C = climatic factor - reported to be 1.0 for New Mexico and
0.40 for Wyoming mining regions (Hu76),
L = unshielded field width factor - assumed to be 1.0,* and
V = vegetative cover factor - assumed to be 1.0*.
Substituting the assigned values into the equation yields an emission
factor of 2.12 MT/hectare-yr for New Mexico mines and 0.850 MT/hectare-yr for
Wyoming mines. These factors are applied with appropriate parameters in
Sections 3.3.4.1 and 3.4.4.3 to estimate the average annual contaminant
emissions due to wind erosion.
The mass emission factors due to wind erosion of the ore stockpiles were
computed by the equation (Bo78)
EF = 0.025 (S) (D) ( d ) (f)
1.5 90 235 15 (1-2)
*Dale, J.T., 1979, Air Program Branch, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
Region VIII, Denver, CO, Memo Concerning Uranium Resources Development Com-
pany's Mining Operation in San Juan County, Utah - PDS Permit Requirements.
-------
1-2
where,
EF = emission factor, kg of dust per annual MT of material
put through storage cycle,
S = silt content - assumed to be 3.0,*
D = duration of storage - 41 days,
d = dry days per year - reported to be 273 days at Casper, WY
and 306 days at Albuquerque, NM (DOC77), and
f = percent of the time the wind speed exceeds 19.3 km/hr - reported
to be 49 percent at Casper, WY and 20 percent at Albuquerque,
NM (DOC51-60).
Substituting the assigned values into Equation 1-2 provides emission
factors related to ore storage piles at mines in New Mexico and Wyoming of
0.040 kg/MT and 0.086 kg/MT, respectively. These factors are applied with
the appropriate parameters in Sections 3.3.4.1 and 3.4.4.3 to estimate the
average annual contaminant emissions from ore stockpiles due to wind erosion.
1.2.0 References
Bo78 Bonn, R., Cuscino, T., and Cowherd, C., 1978, "Fugitive Emissions from
Integrated Iron and Steel Plants," U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Report, EPA-600/2-78-050.
DOC51-60 Department of Commerce, U.S. Weather Bureau, 1951-1960, "Climatography
of the United States Series 82 -- Decennial Census of the United States
Climate."
DOC77 Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administra-
tion, 1977, "Climatological Data - National Summary," Volume 28, No. 13.
Hu76 Hubbard, S.J., 1976, "Evaluation of Fugitive Dust Emissions from Mining:
Task 1 Report - Identification of Fugitive Dust Sources Associated with
Mining," Report prepared by PEDCO-Environmental Specialists, Inc. for
the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Las Vegas, NV.
-------
APPENDIX J
AQUATIC DOSIMETRY AND HEALTH EFFECTS MODELS
AND PARAMETER VALUES
-------
J-l
J.I Introduction
This appendix describes the methodology and the parametric values used
to estimate dose equivalents and health risks for maximum and average
individuals and for the population within the assessment area surrounding the
generic underground uranium mine site in New Mexico and the generic surface
mine site in Wyoming. In the appendix, the term dose quivalents refers to
the following:
For radionuclides inhaled or ingested by an individual, dose equivalents
are the annual committed dose equivalents that will be accumulated over 70
years following intake for an adult. For external exposure to an indivi-
dual, dose equivalents are the annual dose equivalents to an adult for a
radionuclide buildup time in the environment of 8.5 years (one-half the
assumed period of mine operation of 17 years). For radionuclides inhaled or
ingested by the population, dose equivalents are the annual collective dose
equivalents that will be accumulated over 70 years following intake for an
adult. For external exposure to a population, dose equivalents are the
annual collective dose equivalents to an adult for a radionuclide buildup
time in the environment of 8.5 years (one-half the assumed period of mine
operation of 17 years).
Simple models are used throughout these calculations. The maximum
individual calculations are performed independently from the population
calculations. However, the average individual calculations are obtained by
dividing the population calculations by the population size.
J.2 Pathways Considered
The aquatic pathway analyses consider the general surface stream flow
pattern shown in Fig. J.I. The generic mine is dewatered by pumping water
into the third order stream. Much of the year the only water flowing in the
third order stream is mine water discharge. As the mine water travels down-
stream in the third order stream, it either percolates into the soil beneath
the stream or evaporates. At some location downstream before the third order
stream enters the second order stream, the third order stream dries up so
that, for a large part of the year, the radioactive discharges in the mine
water do not reach the second nor the first order streams. Some of the
discharged radioactivity moves into the soil beneath the third order stream
-------
J-2
bed and the rest is probably deposited in the sediment on the stream bottom.
The radioactivity deposited in the sediment is subject to resuspension and
transport to the second order and first order streams during periods of
flooding. However, during these floods, the resuspended radioactivity would
be subject to the large dilution volumes associated with the flood. Some of
the radioactivity that percolates into the soil could eventually reach
shallow groundwater, but many of the radionuclides would be subject to large
removal factors because of ion-exchange interactions between radionuclides
and components of the soil. These interactions would cause groundwater
concentrations of radionuclides to be greatly reduced when compared to the
original surface water concentrations.
An effort has been made to use realistic computational methods and para-
metric data in these analyses whenever possible. However, when actual data
did not exist, some conservative assumptions were made. The continuous stream
flow assumption discussed in the following paragraph is the major con-
servative assumption in these aquatic analyses.
To correctly analyze the effects of radionuclides discharged from the
mine to third order streams, one would have to have extensive hydro!ogic
information on stream flow rates over a long period of record in order to
predict the quantities of radionuclides reaching the second order and first
order streams. One would also need extensive information on soil types and
ion-exchange characterisitics of the soils within the stream bed areas.
Because these data are not obtainable for use in these analyses, the
simplifying assumption is made that the third order stream discharges mine
water continuously into the second order stream and that the second order
stream discharges continuously into the first order stream. Thus, the water
concentrations of radionuclides in the first order stream are computed by
dividing the annual radionuclide discharge from one mine by the
average-annual flow rate in the first order stream. Population and average
individual dose equivalents and health effects estimates are calculated using
these water concentrations. Maximum individual dose equivalents and health
effects are computed using the water concentrations in the second order
stream which are computed by dividing the annual radionuclide discharges from
one mine by the annual average flow rate for the second order stream. These
-------
J-3
Sub-basin Stream
(3rd Order)
Basin Stream
(2nd Order)
Basin or
Regional Basin
Stream
(1st Order)
Figure J.1 Surface stream flow pattern within drainage area
-------
J-4
techniques for predicting water concentration should be quite conservative
since they do not account for periods of no-flow in the third order streams
nor for loss of radioactivity from the water by percolation into the soil.
The environmental transport pathways which are examined as potential
contributors of dose equivalents and health effects to individuals and to the
population are listed in Table J.I. It was found that essentially all pot-
able drinking water in both the New Mexico and the Wyoming assessment areas
is taken from groundwater supplies. Public water supplies are taken from
aquifers below the elevation of the aquifers which could be affected by
recharge from the mine surface water. For this reason, drinking water (path-
way 1) is not considered as a pathway of exposure to the population.
Drinking water could be a significant pathway of exposure for the maximum
individual living near a uranium mine if he were drinking surface water
downstream of the mine discharge point or water from a shallow aquifer which
had been recharged by the mine surface water. However, this pathway was not
assessed because it was not possible to quantify radionuclide concentrations
in potable groundwater from mine discharges with available information.
Also, it is believed that the occurrence of direct consumption by individuals
of surface water containing mine discharges would be infrequent or non-
existent.
Through telephone conversations, it was learned that almost all milk
cows in the assessment areas obtain their drinking water from groundwater
supplies. In addition, most of the dairy cattle are located 50 km or more
away from the uranium mines (Romo, T., Valencia County Agent, Los Lunas, NM,
1979, personal communication and Loper, R., Soil Conservation Service, U.S.
Department of Agriculture, Douglas, WY, 1979, personal communication). For
these reasons, consumption of milk produced by cows drinking contaminated
water is not considered in the population dose equivalent calculations.
Thus, the pathways listed in Table J-l which are considered for the popu-
lation dose equivalent calculations are 2 through 8 and 10. For the maximum
individual dose equivalent calculations, the pathways considered are 2
through 10.
For these generic site analyses, detailed data are not readily available
regarding fish catch and surface stream water usage as a function of distance
downstream from the mine for the third, second, and first order streams.
-------
J-5
Thus, a simplified approach is taken in computing the population dose
equivalents and health effects. The population assessment area is defined as
the areas draining into the streams shown in Fig. J.I. These drainage areas
are discussed in more detail in Sections 3.3.3 and 3.4.3*. To compute the
population dose equivalents and health effects, the assumption is made that
the water concentrations in the first order stream are representative of the
radionuclide concentrations to which persons within the assessment area could
be exposed. The resulting river water concentrations of radionuclides are
applied to each of the eight pathways for which population dose equivalents
are calculated.
The mathematical models used for the population and maximum individual
dose equivalents and health effects calculations will be discussed in the
following paragraphs. Average individual dose equivalents and health effects
are computed by dividing the population values by the number of persons in
the assessment area. For each pathway, dose equivalents are calculated for
endosteal cells (bone), red bone marrow, lung, liver, stomach wall, lower
large intestine (LLI) wall, thyroid, kidney, muscle, ovaries, testes and a
weighted mean dose equivalent which is weighted over all organs. For the
external exposure pathways (pathways 7 and 8) these dose equivalents are used
to estimate health impact by applying a dose-to-health-impact conversion
factor. This factor is a function of organ and is independent of the nuclide
involved. However, for all of the internal exposure pathways (pathways 1
through 6, 9, and 10) dose equivalents are calculated and reported only for
the purpose of supplying this information to the reader. The health impact
for each pathway is estimated by computing the quantity of each radionuclide
taken in by the population or a maximum individual and applying an intake-
to-health-impact conversion factor. This factor is a function of the nuclide
involved but is not a function of organ. When estimates of health impacts
have been computed for each pathway and radionuclide involved, they may be
summed over pathways and radionuclides to obtain an estimate of total health
impacts to the population, and the average and maximum individuals.
2
*For the Wyoming site, the assessment area is the 13,650 km regional basin
drainage area of the Cheyenne River discussed in Section 3.3.3.1.2. For the
New Mexico site, the assessment area is the 19,037 km basin drainage area of
the Rio San Jose-Rio Puerco Rivers discussed in Section 3.4.3.1.2.
-------
J-6
Table J.I Aquatic environmental transport pathways examined
Pathway Number Pathway
1 Drinking water ingestion
2 Freshwater fish ingestion
3 Above-surface crops ingestion --
Irrigated Cropland
4 Milk ingestion -- cows consuming forage raised
on irrigated pastures
5 Beef ingestion -- cows consuming forage raised
on irrigated pastures
6 Inhalation of resuspended material deposited
during irrigation
7 External exposure due to ground contamination by
material deposited during irrigation
8 External exposure due to air submersion in resus-
pended material originally deposited during
irrigation
9 Milk ingestion -- cows drinking contaminated
surface water
10 Beef ingestion cows drinking contaminated
surface water
-------
J-7
J.3 Freshwater Fish Ingestlon
The computational equation for intake of a radionuclide by the maximum
individual is
II = "n CFn 'f
where,
II = annual intake of radionuclide n through pathway p for the
maximum individual (Ci/y),
Qn = release rate of radionuclide n to the third order stream (Ci/y),
CF = concentration factor for freshwater fish for radionuclide n
(Ci/kg per Ci/£ ),
I* = freshwater fish annual consumption rate for an individual (kg/y),
and
R- d = flow rate in 2nd order stream (^ /y).
The maximum individual dose equivalent may be computed from the equation
DInop ' "np ' Dnop <°-2>
where ,
DI = dose equivalent rate to the maximum individual for nuclide n,
nop ^
organ o, and pathway p (rem/y), and
D D = dose equivalent conversion factor for nuclide n, organ o, and
pathway p (rem/Ci intake unless specified otherwise)..
The maximum individual increased health risk may be computed using the equation
IRnp * "np HInp (J'3)
where,
-------
0-8
IR = increased annual health risk* rate to the maximum individual for
np
nuclide n and pathway p (increase in risk per year of release), and
HI = health risk conversion factor for nuclide n and pathway p (increase
np
in risk/Ci intake).
Equation J.3 may be applied for computing either fatal cancer risk or
genetic risk to future generations by applying HI for fatal cancer risk or
genetic risk, respectively.
The equation used to compute total intake of a radionuclide by the popu-
lation was
IPnp - Qn CFn 'f Pff (J.4)
R
where,
IP = annual intake of radionuclide n through pathway p for the population
(person Ci/y),
R = flow rate in 1st order stream U/y), and
Pff = population eating freshwater fish taken from streams in the assess-
ment area (persons).
The population dose equivalent may be computed from the equation
DPnop = IPnp Dnop
where,
DP = annual dose equivalent to the population for nuclide n, organ o,
and pathway p (person-rem/y);
*The term health risk is used to describe the increase in fatal cancer risk
to an individual during his lifetime for somatic risks. For genetic risk, the
term health risk refers to the increased chance for genetic defects in all the
decendants of an exposed individual.
-------
J-9
and the annual health effects to the population may be computed using the equation
PRnp ' IPnp ' HInp <>«)
where,
PR = annual health effects to the population for nuclide n and pathway p
(health effects /y of release).
Equation J.6 may be applied for computing either fatal cancers or genetic
effects to future generations by applying the proper value for HI , as dis-
cussed above.
The annual dose equivalent and increased health risk to an average indi-
vidual may be computed using equations J.7 and J.8, respectively.
DAInop " DPnop/PT
AIRnp ' PVPT
-------
J-10
where,
2
W = irrigation rate of irrigated farmland U/m -y), and
RI = intake rate of radionuclide n by standard man for above-surface
crops and for a continuous deposition rate to the surface for root
2
uptake due to ditch irrigation (Ci intake/y per Ci/m -y deposited).
The approach for calculation of RI uses techniques described in Regu-
latory Guide 1.109 (NRC77) and AIRDOS-EPA (Mo79) to compute intake rate by
receptors per unit deposition rate (by ditch irrigation) to the ground sur-
face. Basically, equations 49 (vegetation), 51 (milk), or 52 (beef) from the
AIRDOS-EPA document (Mo79) are utilized to predict concentrations of radio-
nuclides in the foodstuffs at equilibrium. Only the root uptake portion of
these equations is used since essentially all irrigation in the assessment
areas is ditch irrigation (Romo, T. , Valencia County Agent, Los Lunas, NM.,
1979, personal communication, and Loper, R. , Soil Conservation Service, U.S.
Department of Agriculture, Douglas, WY, 1979, personal communication). The
effects of removal of radionuclides from the soil root zone by leaching are
added to the equations used to predict concentrations of radionuclides in
foodstuffs since this is an important removal mechanism for the long-lived
radionuclides considered in this analysis. The concentrations are multiplied
by the annual intake rate of the foodstuff by an individual and divided by
the annual deposition rate of radionuclides to the ground surface to yield
the quantity RInD- The maximum individual dose equivalents may be computed
using equation J.2 and the increased health risk to the maximum individual
may be computed using equation J.3.
The equation to use in computing total intake of a radionuclide by the
population is
IPnp = Qn " % Pp (
R
where,
P = population consuming foodstuffs raised on irrigated land (persons)
P can be determined using the equation
P = CP f AI (
-------
J-ll
and the ratio can be written
RI f
W/R =__L_ = J*
AJ . R AJ (j.i2)
where,
CPp = persons per unit area that can be fed from foodstuff p raised on
irrigated land (persons fed/m ),
f = fraction of irrigated land used to raise foodstuff p,
AJ = irrigated land area within the assessment area (m2),
Rj = total flow of irrigation water (Vyr), and
fD = _L_= fraction of river flow used for irrigation.
K R
Substituting equations J.ll and J.12 into J.10 and cancelling like terms yields
IPnp ' ^n fR RInp CPP - V (J-13)
The population annual dose equivalents may be computed using equation
J.5 and the annual increased health effects to the population may be computed
using equation J.6. The annual dose equivalents and increased health risks to
an average individual may be computed using equations 0.7 and J.8.
J.5 Inhalation of Resuspended Material Deposited During Irrigation
In determining the equations to use to model resuspension of radioactive
materials deposited by irrigation water, it is assumed that the resuspended
material does not disperse beyond the irrigation area. This assumption
should be acceptable for dose equivalent and health effects calculations
where the irrigation area is large compared to a point resuspension source
and where the population density does not vary greatly within an assessment
area. Both of these criteria are met for the New Mexico and the Wyoming
assessment areas.
Figure J.2 shows, pictorially, the conservation of mass relationship
used in the resuspension model. The differential equation which expresses the
change in soil surface concentration as a function of time is
n = Qn_^ + vgn . xn -W WVAsnnn (J
-------
J-12
where,
2
nn = ground concentration of nuclide n at time t (Ci/m ),
t = time after release of material to surface stream (y),
v = deposition velocity from air to land surface (m/y),
gn 2
X = air concentration of nuclide n (Ci/m ),
Xn = rate constant for resuspension of radionuclides from soil to air
i
(y K -i
xDn = radioactive decay constant for radionuclide n (y ),
X = rate constant for transfer of radionuclides from available to
-1
unavailable status in soil (y" ),
and the other terms are as previously defined.
If it is further assumed that, at equilibrium, the material resuspended
from the ground surface is equal to the material redeposited to the ground sur-
face (i.e., v__X_ = ^r^O, the differential equation can be simplified to yield
yn n KM
dftn = Qn w
Equation J.15 would rigorously hold only for equilibrium conditions. It can be
shown that it is conservative to apply the nonequilibrium initial conditions,
ftn = 0 at t = 0, in solving equation J.15 to yield
n = Qn W [l-e-(XDn + Asn)t:]
R
-------
Deposition via
Irrigation Water
Resuspension
Redeposition
(Vgn Xn)
_T_^_T___ Soil
7 7 7 7~ Surface
Radiological Decay
(Aon On)
Transfer to
Soil Sink
(As On)
Figure J.2 Conservation of mass relationship for resuspension model
i
i'
(-0
-------
J-14
This equation is appropriate to apply for the population dose equivalent
calculations. For calculations involving the maximum individual, R is replaced
b* Rind'
The equation used to compute intake of a radionuclide by the maximum
individual is
"np -Vn (J-19)
where,
o
In = breathing rate for standard man (m /y).
Combining equations J.18 and J.19 yields
TT _ Qn W RF I , u
nP " IT H TT-T Cl-e'(XDn + Asn}t] (J.20)
Kind UDn + Xsn;
The maximum individual annual dose equivalents may be computed using equation
J.2 and the maximum individual annual increased health risks may be computed
using equation J.3.
The equation to use in computing total intake of a radionuclide by the
population is
IPnp =.Xn ' !B P AI (J.21)
where,
p = population density within the assessment area (person/m ).
After substitution of equations J.18 and J.12, we have
Tn _ Q. ' fn RF ! - P
tl.e-UDn * xsn)t].
(J'22)
The annual population dose equivalents may be computed using equation
J.5 and the annual increased health effects to the population may be computed
using equation J.6. The annual dose equivalents and increased health risks
to an average individual may be computed using equations J.7 and J.8.
J.6 External Exposure Due to Ground Contamination by Material Deposited from
Irrigation Water
As was discussed earlier, health risks are computed from dose equivalents
for the external exposure pathways. The equation used in computing annual dose
-------
J-15
equivalents to the maximum individual is
DInop = fln. - Dnop SOF (J-23)
where,
Dnop = dose ecluivalent factor for external ground contamination for
nuclide n, organ o, and pathway p (rem/y per Ci/m2), and
SOF = household shielding and occupancy factor (dimensionless).
Upon substitution of equation J.16 we have (substituting R.d for R)
*--"». **->*].
The increase in annual health risks for the maximum individual can be computed
using the equation
DInop ' %
-------
J-16
Substitution of equations J.16 and J.12 into this equation yields
'
- (J.27)
*
sn'
For equations J.24 and J.27, the exposed persons are represented as a point
receptor 1 m above a plane surface with a uniform distribution of radioactivity.
The increase in health risks for the population are estimated using the equation
PRnop ' DPnop ' HEop
where,
PR = increased annual health effects to the population for nuclide n,
nop
organ o, and pathway p (health effects /y of release).
The annual dose equivalents and increased health risks to an average indi-
vidual may be computed using equations J.7, and J.29, respectively:
AIRnop ' PRnop/PT
where,
AIR = annual increased health risk to the average individual for
nuclide n, organ o, and pathway p (increase in risk/year of release),
J.7 External Exposure Due to Air Submersion in Resuspended Material Originally
Deposited During Irrigation
The equation applied in calculating maximum individual annual external
dose equivalents due to submersion is
DInop ' Xn ' Dnop SOF
-------
J-17
where,
Dnop = dose ecluiva1ent conversion factor for external air submersion
for nuclide n, organ o, and pathway p (rem/y per Ci/m3).
Upon combining equations J.30 and J.18, the dose equivalent rate equation becomes
DI.
nop
Kind U0n snj
The increase in annual health risks for the maximum individual can be computed
using equation J.25.
The equation for computing external population annual dose equivalents
due to air submersion is
DPnop ' Xn ' Dnop SOF . p . A, (0.32)
Substitution of equations J.18 and J.12 into equation J.32 yields
OPnop - W *F
Equations J.31 and J.33 are derived assuming a point receptor immersed in a
semi-infinite hemispherical cloud of air in which the distribution of activity
is spatially uniform.
The increase in annual health risks for the population are estimated
using equation J.28. The annual dose equivalent and increased health risk
to an average individual may be computed using equations J.7 and J.29,
respectively.
-------
J-18
J.8 Milk IngestionCows Drinking Contaminated Surface Water
The computational equation for intake of a radionuclide by the maximum
individual is
Hnp = Qn ' Jwm Fmn W (J'34)
Rind
where,
I = milk cow drinking water ingestion rate
F = concentration of radionuclide n in the milk per unit daily
intake of the radionuclide via cattle drinking water (Ci/£
milk per Ci/day), and
I P = adult consumption rate of milk fe/y).
The maximum annual individual dose equivalents may be computed from equation
J.2 and the maximum annual individual increased health risks may be computed
using equation J.3. Annual population dose equivalents and increased health
impacts were not calculated for this pathway since it was determined that
consumption of contaminated drinking water by milk cows would be infrequent
or nonexistent.
J.9 Beef IngestionCows Drinking Contaminated Surface Water
The computational equation for intake of a radionuclide by the maximum
individual is
Hnp % ' JWB * FBn
*ind
where,
IWB = beef cattle drinking water ingestion rate G,/d),
Fgn = concentration of radionuclide n in beef per unit daily intake
of the radionuclide via cattle drinking water (Ci/kg beef per
Ci/day), and
IBF = adult consumption rate of beef (kg/y).
-------
J-19
The maximum individual annual dose equivalents may be computed from equation
J.2 and the maximum individual annual increased health risks may be computed
using equation J.3.
For computing total intake of a radionuclide by the population, the
appropriate equation is
IPnp = Qn ' TWB ' FBn ' TBF ' PBW
£ (J.36)
where,
V, = number of persons eating beef from cows which drink contaminated
water (persons).
The annual population dose equivalents may be computed from equation J.5 and
the annual increased health effects to the population may be computed using
equation J.6. The annual dose equivalents and increased health risks to an
average individual may be computed using equations J.7 and J.8, respectively.
J.10 Generic Sites
Two generic sites were chosen to represent locations where uranium mines
may be located. A generic site in Converse County, Wyoming, was chosen to
represent typical surface mine sites and one in Valencia County, New Mexico,
was chosen to represent typical underground mining sites. Figure J.I shows
the general assessment area for both generic sites. These sites are
described more fully in Sections 3.3.3 and 3.4.3 and in Subsection J.2 of
this appendix. Some of the characteristics of these sites used in the dose
equivalent and health effects calculations are listed in Table J.2.
-------
Table J.2 Characteristics of the generic sites
J-20
New Mexico
Wyoming
Annual rainfall (cm)
Total population in
assessment area
Population density in 2
assessment area (persons/m )
2
Assessment area size (km )
20
64,950
3.41xlO"6
19,037
28
16,230
1.19xlO"6
13,650
Streams within assessment area^ '
(avg. annual flow
rate,
Third order
Arroyo del Puerto-
San Mateo Creek
(small)
Not named
(small)
Second order
Rio San Jose
(5.83xl09)
Lance Creek
(2.18xl010)
First order
Rio Puerco
(4.26xl010
Cheyenne, Dry Fork
(5.64xl010)
Number of persons eating fish
containing radionuclides from
mine discharges
Annual irrigation rate with-
in assessment areas (m)
Fraction of annual-average
first order stream flow
used for irrigation
Land area irrigated with-?
in assessment area (km )
Number of persons eating beef
from cows drinking
contaminated water
6,495
1.07(b)
1,623
0.59
0.30
12(b)
38,510
0.29
28
3,454
Sections 3.3.3 and 3.4.3 for a full discussion of assessment
area streams and hydrology.
^ 'Some groundwater used for irrigation. See discussion in Subsection J.13.
-------
J-21
J.ll Population and Population Density in Assessment Areas
For both generic sites, the population within the assessment area is
determined by computing the population density for a county containing a
significant part of the assessment area and then scaling this population
density up to the assessment area size. For New Mexico, Valencia County data
are used (Romo, T., Valencia County Agent, Los Lunas, NM, 1979, personal
communication). The current population of Valencia County is about 50,000
2
persons. The county area is 14,650 km . The population density, based on
fi ?
these data, is 3.41 x 10~ persons/m . Considering the size of the assessment
2
area to be 19,037 km (Section 3.4.3), the estimated total population in the
assessment area is 64,950 persons. For Wyoming, Converse County data are
applied (Zaborac, J., Converse Area Planning Office, Douglas, WY, 1979,
personal communication). The estimated current population of Converse County
2
is 13,000 persons and the county area is 10,930 km . Thus, the population
C O
density is calculated to be 1.19 x 10 persons/m . The assessment area
2
contains 13,650 km (Section 3.3.3); therefore, the total population within
the Wyoming assessment area is estimated to be 16,230.
J.12 Population Consuming Fish Containing Radionuclides Discharged
from Mines
Information on fish catch specific to the assessment areas is not
available. However, three sources agreed that there is very little fishing
activity in the streams in these areas (Patterson, R., New Mexico Game and
Fish Department, Santa Fe, NM, 1979, personal communication; Baughman, J.,
Wyoming Game and Fish Division, Cheyenne, WY, 1979, personal communication;
and Kaufmann, R., U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Radiation
Programs, Las Vegas Facility, Las Vegas, NV, 1979, personal communication).
Considering these data and the lack of specific information, it is assumed
that 10 percent of the population within each assessment area consumes fish
taken from streams within the assessment area. Based on the hydrologic
characteristics of these areas, this is probably a conservative assumption.
J.13 Irrigation Within the Assessment Areas
For the New Mexico site, the following irrigation information was
-------
J-22
obtained for Valencia County (Romo, T., Valencia County Agent, Los Lunas, NM,
1979, personal communication). Valencia County is a very large county and
the Rio Grande flows through the eastern part of the county at a distance of
about 100 km from the uranium mine site. Since it is known that a large
amount of irrigation within the county occurs along the Rio Grande and since
the Rio Grande was not included in the assessment area, the effect of the
irrigation along the Rio Grande was extracted from the county data in
estimating the amount of irrigated land within the assessment area. The
calculational procedure is described below.
The three major streams for irrigation in Valencia County are the Rio
San Jose (second order), the Rio Puerco (first order), and the Rio Grande.
The average irrigation rate is 1.07 m/yr. Within Valencia County, 11,234
hectares are irrigated with surface water only, and 5,306 hectares use a
combination of surface water and groundwater for irrigation. It is assumed
that for this 5,306 hectares 50 percent of the irrigation water is surface
water and 50 percent of this is groundwater that does not contain
mine-related radionuclides. To calculate the equivalent acres
of land totally irrigated from the Rio San Jose and the Rio Puerco within
Valencia County we assume that the amount of irrigation existing along
a stream is directly proportional to the product of the annual-average flow
rate and the length of the stream within the county. Thus a ratio is
established to predict the fraction of total land irrigated in Valencia
County that is irrigated from the Rio San Jose and the Rio Puerco. The data
applied in calculating this ratio are listed in Table J.3.
The ratio is
47.5(4.3xl07) + 132.5(5.8xl06) n n,7
7 j^ g = U.UO/.
47.5(4.3x100 + 132.5(5.8x10°) + 45(8.7x10°)
Then the equivalent land irrigated using surface water from the Rio San Jose
and Rio Puerco in Valencia County is 11,234 (0.067) + 5,306 (0.5)(0.067) =
930 hectares. Scaling this up to the assessment area size using the ratio of
assessment area size to Valencia County size yields:
-------
J-23
Table J.3 Stream data for Valencia County
Length Within Annual Average Flow
Stream Valencia County (km) Rate (m /yr)
Rio San Jose
Rio Puerco
Rio Grande
132.5
47.5
45
5.8xl06
4.3xl07
8.7xl08
930 hectares x 19.037 x 0.01 km2 _ 12 lkn)2.
14,650 hectares
The surface water usage to irrigate this land (1.07 m/y) is 1.29 x 10 £/y
and the fraction of the river flow in the first order stream that the surface
water irrigation represents is 1.29 x 10 /4.26 x 10 = 0.30.
For the Wyoming site, the area of land irrigated within the assessment
2
area is given in Section 3.3.3 as 2,800 hectares (28 km ). This land is
irrigated almost entirely with surface water (Loper, R. , Soil Conservation
Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Douglas, WY, 1979, personal com-
munication). The average irrigation rate within the area is
0.588 m3 (WSG77).
m -y
Thus the estimated total irrigation water usage within the assessment area is
(0.588 m)(2.8x!07m2) = 1.65 x 107 m3 = 1.65 x 1010a /yr.
y y
Then, the fraction of the first order stream flow that is used for irrigation
is 1.65 x 1010/5.6 x 1010 = 0.29.
-------
J-24
J.14 Population Consuming Beef from Cattle Drinking Water Containing Radio-
nuclides Discharged from the Uranium Mine
For the New Mexico site, information on beef consumption is taken from
the USDA (DOA73), (Herman, J., Statistician-in-Charge, New Mexico Crop and
Livestock Reporting Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Las Cruces, NM,
1979, personal communication). The term "beef" is a misnomer in that total
red meat consumption is actually considered in these calculations. Since
well over 50 percent of the red meat production is beef, the calculations are
simplified by assuming that all meat production, excluding poultry, is beef
for the purpose of this assessment. Table J.4 shows the computational pro-
cedure used to estimate the total meat production for Valencia County for
1977. Using this information, the total edible meat production for the
assessment area can be estimated as
2
19>037 km9 (5.038 x 106 kg/y) = 6.547 x 106 kg/y
14,650 knr
It is estimated that about 50 percent of the water drunk by meat producing
animals in the assessment area is surface water and 50 percent uncontaminated
groundwater (Kaufmann, R., U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of
Radiation Programs, Las Vegas Facility, Las Vegas, NV, 1979, personal com-
munication). Then the weight of edible meat from animals drinking surface
water containing mine effluents is 3.273 x 10 kg/y. Since it is estimated
that an adult eats 85 kg/y of meat (Mo79), the number of persons eating meat
from animals raised in the assessment area which drink water containing mine
effluent is 38,510 persons.
For the Wyoming site, information on meat consumption was obtained from
the USDA (DOA79). The information listed in Table J.5 shows the computa-
tional procedure used to estimate the meat production for Converse County for
1976. Thus, the total edible meat production for the assessment area can be
estimated as
2
13,650 km (469,700 kc[) = 5.866 x 105 kg meat.
10,930 knr y y
-------
J.4 Estimation of meat production in Valencia County for 1977
1977 NM State Edible 1977 NM State
Live Weight Fraction Edible Meat.Co'
Slaughter^ Live Weight^ ' puted from
Animal
1
Cattle
Hogs
Sheep
(kg)
2
260,813,700
8,862,900
4,487,460
Col. 2 and 3
(kg)
3 4
.55 143,447,500
.65 5,760,880
.55 2,468,110
Total Animals
on Pasture
Jan. 1, 1973^
m-
NM State Valencia
5
1,615,000
63,000
743,000
Total
County
6
54,000
1,500
30,000
Edible Meat
Ratio of Animals
on Pasture,
Valencia County*
New Mexico State
(Computed from
Col. 5 and 6)
7
0.0334
0.0238
0.0404
Valencia County
Estimated Edible
Meat Production
for Valencia
County (Computed
from Col . 4 and 7)
(kg/y)
8
4,791,000
137,100
99,700
5,027,800
(a)
Herman, J., Statistician-in-Charge, New Mexico Crop and Livestock Reporting Service, U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Las Cruces, NM, 1979, personal communication.
^ 'Walsh, P., Statistician-in-Charge, Alabama Crop and Livestock Reporting Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture,
1979, personal communication.
I
ro
en
-------
Table J.5 Estimation of meat production in Converse County, Wyoming for 1976
Animals
1
Cattle
Red Meat
Animals
(Cattle,
hogs, and
sheep)
Total Animals Ratio of Animals
1976 Wyoming on Pasture on Pasture, Converse
State Red Meat Jan. 1, 1976^ County * Wyoming State
Production (Computed from
(kg) Wyoming Converse Col. 3 and 4)
State County
234 5
1,580,000 74,000 0.0468
10,028,200 ~ 0.0468(b)
Estimated Edible Meat
Production for Converse
County (Computed from
Col. 2 and 5)
(kg)
y
6
469,300
* '
Applied value for cattle
cattle furnish the majority of the red meat production for Converse County
and for the State of Wyoming.
ro
CTl
-------
J-27
As for New Mexico, it was estimated that about 50 percent of the water
drunk by meat producing animals in the assessment area is surface water and
50 percent uncontaminated groundwater (Loper, R., Soil Conservation Service,
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Douglas, WY, 1979, personal communication).
Thus, the estimated weight of edible meat from animals drinking surface water
containing mine effluents is 293,500 kg meat/y. Using the 85 kg/y adult meat
consumption rate (Mo79) used for New Mexico, the number of persons eating
meat from animals raised in the assessment area which drink water containing
mine effluent is 3,454 persons.
J.15 Radionuclide Releases
For both the New Mexico and the Wyoming sites, radionuclide releases are
given for "total uranium" and radium-226 in Tables 3.44 and 3.25, respec-
tively. The total uranium releases are kg per year. This "total uranium"
will be almost totally U-238 by weight. For this reason, it is assumed that
the "total uranium" release is entirely U-238. Further assumptions are that
U-234 is in secular equilibrium with U-238 but that Th-230 precipitates out
of the mine water. Also, it is assumed that Rn-222, Pb-214, Bi-214, Pb-210,
and Po-210 are in secular equilibrium with Ra-226. The radionuclides
Pa-234m, Pa-234, Po-218, At-218, Po-214, Tl-210, Bi-210 and Tl-206 are not
included in the analysis because they are not dosimetrically significant or
they have very low branching ratios.
The total uranium release rate for New Mexico is listed as 1,480
kg/y-mine. The conversion from kg to Ci for U-238 is 3.336x10" Ci/kg. Using
this factor, the estimated release rate of U-238 is 0.494 Ci/y-mine. The
release rate for Ra-226 is 0.0144 Ci/y-mine. The total uranium release rate
at the Wyoming site is listed as 110 kg/y-mine. Using the conversion factor,
this release rate can be stated as 0.0367 Ci/y-mine. The Ra-226 release rate
is 0.0065 Ci/y-mine.
As discussed in Section 3.3.3.1.4, radium-226 is strongly sorbed 'onto
stream sediments and is subject to precipitation. For these reasons, it is
assumed that only 10% of the Ra-226 released in mine discharges is still
available in surface water in the second and first order streams. Thus, the
-------
J-28
"effective" annual release of Ra-226 is 10% of the actual releases in mine
water. Using the assumptions regarding secular equilibrium stated above, the
radionuclide release rates used in the analyses for both sites are listed in
Table J.6.
0.16 Fish Concentration Factors
The fish concentration factors express the ratio of radionuclide level
in freshwater fish (Ci/kg) per unit concentration in water (Ci/fc). The
values used for this parameter are suggested by Thompson (Th72) and are
listed in Table J.7.
J.17 Fish Consumption and Air Inhalation Rates
The freshwater fish consumption for an individual is taken as 1.0 kg/y
which is the value used in the report by the United Nations Scientific
Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (UN77). This value is not
specifically stated in Regulatory Guide 1.109 (NRC77). The breathing rate
for an individual of 8030 m /y (Mo79) is used for this analysis. This value
3
is in close agreement with the value of 8,000 m /y listed in Regulatory Guide
1.109.
J.18 Stream Flow Rates
As was noted in Section J.2, second order stream flow rates were used in
computing maximum individual dose equivalents. These flow rates are listed
in Table J.2. For the New Mexico site, the second order stream flow rate is
9 in
5.83 x 10 a/y and for the Wyoming site it is 2.18 x 10 £/y. First order
stream flow rates are considered to be more representative for computations
involving the population and an average individual. These flow rates are
also listed in Table J.2 and are 4.26 x 10 fc/y for the New Mexico site and
5.64 x 10 £/y for the Wyoming site.
J.19 Normalized Human Intake Rate Factors
The normalized human intake rate factors, RInD> express the intake rate
of radionuclide n by standard man from consumption of above-surface crops,
milk, and beef for a continuous deposition rate to the surface. For this
-------
J-29
Table J.6 Annual radionuelide release rates to
streams for active uranium mines
Nucl ide
U-238
U-234
Th-230
Ra-226
Rn-222
Pb-214
Bi-214
Pb-210
Po-210
Table J. 7
Nucl ide
U-238
U-234
Ra-226
Rn-222
Pb-214
Bi-214
Pb-210
Po-210
Release Rates
New Mexico Si
0.494
0.494
0
0.00144
0.00144
0.00144
0.00144
0.00144
0.00144
for 1 Mine (Ci/y-mine)
te Wyoming Site
0.0367
0.0367
0
0.00065
0.00065
0.00065
0.00065
0.00065
0.00065
Freshwater fish concentration factors
Concentration
Factor (Ci/Kg t CI'/A )
2
2
50
57
100
15
100
500
-------
J-30
pathway, the source of deposition to the surface is irrigation of farmland.
Only the quantity of radionuclides taken up through the root systems of
plants is considered in deriving these factors since essentially all irri-
gation in the assessment areas is ditch irrigation. The method used to
calculate these factors was discussed in Section J.4 of this appendix and is
taken from the AIRDOS-EPA computer code. The values for various parameters
used in computing RI for above-surface crops, milk, and beef are discussed
in the AIRDOS-EPA manual (Mo79). The normalized human intake rate factors
are tabulated in Table J.8.
J.20 Persons Fed from Foodstuffs Raised on Irrigated Land and Irrigated
Land Usage
The number of persons who can be fed from a unit area of irrigated land
for above-surface crops, milk, and beef is determined from data contained in
the AIRDOS-EPA computer code (Mo79). The values used for these analyses are,
2 -3 -3
in units of persons fed/m , 3.69 x 10 for above-surface crops, 1.76 x 10
-4
for milk, and 1.16 x 10 for beef. In both New Mexico and Wyoming, irri-
gated farmland is used for raising above surface foods for direct consumption
by humans and for raising silage for consumption by both milk and beef cows.
After telephone conversations with both the New Mexico and Wyoming county
agents, the fractions of irrigated land supporting above-surface crops, dairy
farming, and beef farming (see Table J.9) were determined (Romo, T., Valencia
County Agent, Los Lunas, NM, 1980, personal communication and Henderson, F.
Converse County Agent, Douglas, WY, 1980, personal communication).
J.21 Resuspension Factor
The irrigated areas within the assessment sites are assumed to be rela-
tively large, uniformly contaminated areas. For this situation, the resus-
pension factor (RF) is defined as the ratio of air concentration above a
surface to ground surface concentration. It can be shown that this ratio is
RF = xD/vnn' The resuspension rate constant, x D, can vary over a wide range
K gn -. _,, , K
of values between 10 and 10 sec (Ne78). Since resuspension for this
analysis is confined to irrigated land which should have a relatively damp
surface, it is believed that a low resuspension rate should be used. The
resuspension rate constant chosen for this analysis isAD=lO sec . The
K
deposition velocity to the ground surface (v ) can vary from values as low
as 0.001 m/sec to as high as 0.1 m/sec (S168). For generic analyses where
-------
J-31
Table J.8 Normalized human intake rate factors for
radionuclide uptake via plant root systems
Nu elide
U-238
U-234
Ra-226
Rn-222
Pb-214
Bi-214
Pb-210
Po-210
Type of food
Above-surface
Milk
Beef
(Ci/day
Above Surface
Crops
3.21xlO"2
3.21xlO"2
1.90xlO"2
6.39X10"1
3.68xlO"2
8.43X10"1
2.98xlO"2
1.97xlO"3
Table J.
New
crops
RI
np 2
intake per Ci/m -day deposited)
Milk
2.02xlO"4
2.02xlO"4
3.93xlO"3
4.61X10"1
8.40xlO"4
1.51xlO"2
7.51xlO"4
3.42xlO"5
9 Irrigated land
Fraction of i
to raise each
Mexico
0.70
0.15
0.15
Beef
1.75xlO"6
1.75xlO"6
2.53xlO"3
3.49X10"1
6.66xlO"3
3.92X10"1
5.23xlO"3
1.88xlO"3
usage
rri gated land used
type of food
Wyoming
0.10
0.45
0.45
-------
J-32
the site specific value is not known, a commonly chosen value for v is 0.01
m/sec, and this is the value used in this analysis. The value for RF in-
ferred from the values chosen for ^R and v is
RF = xo/vnn = 10"11 sec"1 = 10"9/m
K y n i
0.01 m sec"
0.22 Soil Removal Rate Constant
The soil removal rate constant from available to unavailable soil (xsn)
expresses the rate of movement of radionuclides from the plant root zone in
soil to the soil below the root zone. The values used in this analysis are
based upon a method described by Baes (Ba79). The soil removal rate con-
stants were computed using the data suggested by Baes except that values for
the distribution coefficients for the nuclides not discussed by Baes were
taken from a report by the Arthur D. Little Company (EPA77). The values
used for the soil removal rate constant in this analysis are listed in Table
0.10.
0.23 Radionuclide Decay Constants
The radionuclide decay constants express the rate of radioacitve decay
for the nuclides considered in this analysis. The values of this parameter
for these nuclides are listed in Table 0.10 and are derived using the
half-lives given in the Radiological Health Handbook (HEW70). Since secular
equilibrium was assumed (see 0.15), the radionuclide decay constant for
Ra-226 was used for its short-lived daughter products.
0.24 Shielding and Occupancy Factor
The shielding and occupancy factor is used to account for shielding of
persons by buildings during the time that they spend indoors. It is also
used to account for time spent away from the radiation exposure area. The
shielding and occupancy factor used in this analysis is 0.5 and is taken from
Regulatory Guide 1.109 (NRC77).
-------
J-33
Table J.10 Soil removal rate constants and radioactive decay constants
Soil Removal Radioactive Decay
Nu elide
U-238
U-234
Ra-226
Rn-222
Pb-214
Bi-214
Pb-210
Po-210
Nuclide
U-238
U-234
Ra-226
Rn-222
Pb-214
Bi-214
Pb-210
Po-210
Rate Constants (y"1) Constants, x Dn (y"1)
2.58xlO"4
2.58xlO"4
7.74xlO"3
4.93
1.94xlO"4
7.63xlO"2
1.94xlO"4
_0
3.26x10 6
Table J.ll Milk and beef concentration
Milk Concentration Factor
(Ci/£ milk per Ci/d intake)
1.40xlO"4
1.40xlO"4
5.90xlO~4
2.00xlO"2
c
8.70x10
5.00xlO"4
9.90xlO"5
1.20xlO"4
1.54xlO"10
2.81xlO"6
4.33xlO"4
6.62X101
1.36xl04
1.85xl04
3.30xlO"2
n
1.83xlOu
factors
Beef Concentration Factor
(Ci/kg beef per Ci/day intake)
1.60X10"6
1.60xlO"6
5.00xlO"4
2.00xlO"2
-4
9.10x10
1.70X10"2
9.10xlO"4
8.70xlO"3
-------
J-34
J.25 Milk and Beef Ingestion Rates by Humans and Milk and Beef Cow Drinking
Water Rates
The milk ingestion rate by humans is assumed to be 112 £/y which is the
value used in AIRDOS-EPA (Mo79). In computing dose equivalents for the beef
ingestion pathway, hogs and sheep are lumped into the beef pathway. This
simplified the calculations, and it is believed that the assumption is rea-
sonable since cattle account for well over 50 percent of the meat production
in both the New Mexico and Wyoming assessment areas (DOA73, DOA79). The meat
ingestion rate by humans is assumed to be 85 kg/y, which is the value listed
for adults in AIRDOS-EPA (Mo79). This ingestion rate is employed in deter-
mining the number of persons who could be fed from meat produced within the
assessment areas, as discussed in Section J.14.
The milk cow drinking water intake used in these calculations is 60
£/d; for beef cattle, the value is 50 Ji/d. Both values are the ones
suggested in Regulatory Guide 1.109 (NRC77).
J.26 Radionuclide Concentration Factors for Milk and Beef
The radionuclide concentration factors for milk and beef express the
concentration of radionuclides in milk or beef per unit daily intake of
radionucl ides by cattle drinking water. The values for these parameters are
taken from AIRDOS-EPA (Mo79) and are listed in Table J.ll.
J.27 Dosimetry Factors
Internal and external dosimetry factors are derived from the RADRISK
data library which is being developed by Oak Ridge National Laboratory
(Du80). The organs listed are considered to be the more dosimetrically
significant organs. Breast dosimetry factors were used for the calculations
for muscle since the muscle factors were not listed in RADRISK and since the
breast and muscle factors should be similar in magnitude. The dosimetry
factors tabulated as "weighted mean" were obtained by summing over organs the
product of the organ dosimetry factors and a relative-risk weighting factor
for the organ. These dosimetry factors are not the same as total-body dosi-
metry factors but are an attempt to express an overall dose that has been
weighted for risk due to exposing each individual organ. Weighting factors
were chosen to have a sum of 1.
-------
J-35
For the inhalation pathway, the dosimetry factors incorporate the "Task
Group Lung Model" (TGLD66). All nuclides are assumed to be of Class W solu-
bility and an AMAD of l.Ojun is used. Class W solubility is assumed rather
than Class Y because it is believed that in order for radioactive compounds
to be soluble in mine water they must be in a more soluble chemical form than
Class Y compounds. The dosimetry factors used in these assessments are
listed in Table J.12.
J'28 Health Effects Conversion Factors
Health effects conversion factors for the internal and external pathways
are derived from the RADRISK data library (Du80). Internal health effects
conversion factors are needed for both inhalation and ingestion. For these
internal pathways, the conversion factors are specific to each radionuclide
and express the potential health impact per unit radionuclide intake.
External health effects conversion factors are a function of organ but are
radionuclide independent. The factors relate potential health impact to
external radiation dose equivalent. Separate sets of health effect
conversion factors are needed to estimate potential somatic health effects
(fatal cancers) and potential genetic effects (genetic defects in the
offspring of the exposed persons). The health effects conversion factors for
the internal pathways are listed in Table J.13, and those for the external
pathways are listed in Table J.14. Additional discussion of the philosophy
of health impact determination used to obtain the data in the RADRISK data
library is included in Section L.I of Appendix L.
-------
NUCLIDE
U-238
l>-234
RA-226
RN-222
.PB-214
BI-214
PB-210
PO-210
TABLE J.12
DOSE EQUTVAUFM' CONVERSION FACTORS
(INHALATION AND INGESTION=REM/CI INTAKE AIR SU^ERSION=REM/Y PER CI/M**3 GROUND CDOTMINATION=REMA PER CI/M**2)
PATHWAY ORGAN
INHALATION
INGESTION
EXT. AIR SUBMERSION
EXT. GROUND CONIAM.
INHALATION
INGESTION
EXT. AIR SUBMERSION
EXT. GROUND GONTAM.
INHALATION
INGESTION
EXT. AIR SUBMERSION
EXT. GROUND CONIAM.
INHALATION
INGESTION
EXT. AIR SUBMERSION
EXT. GROUND CONTAM.
INHALATION
INGESTION
EXT. AIR SUBMERSION
EXT. GROUND CONTAM.
DMALATION
TNGESTION
EXT. AIR SUBMERSION
EXT. GROUND CONIAM.
INHALATION
INGESTION'
EXT. AIR SUBMERSION
EXT. GROUND CONTAM.
INHALATION
INGESTION
EXT. AIR SUBMERSION
EXT. GROUND OONIAM.
ENDOST. RED LUNG LIVER STOMACH LLI V1ALL
CELLS MARROW WALL
THYRqiD KIDNEY
VEiattED
MEAN
MJSCLE (WARIES TESTES
1.29E+07 4.54E+05 8.40E+07 6.40E-f04 8.11E403 1.02E+05 6.30EfK)4 6.63E+06 2.48E-f07 6.31E+04 6.00E-+04 6.01E+04
1.15E+07 4.02E+05 4.99E403 5.30E+04 8.56E+03 1.40E+05 5.58EW4 5.90E-+O6 3.61E405 5.59E+Q4 5.30E4O4 5.34E+04
3.47E+02 3.08E+02 1.26E+02 2.86E-03 1.07E-K)2 8.18E+01 1.58E402 9.06E+01 1.83E+02 2.37E+02; 9.60E-KH 2.62E+02
2.71E+01 2.32EK)! 8.59EKX) 2.97EKX3 7.26E+00 8.41E-KX) 7.05E-KX) 3.04E+00 1.84E+01 3.29E+01, 5.32E+00 3.89E+01
I ,
1.58E+07 4.66E-405 9.52E407 7.04Ef04 8.33E-M33 8.19E+04 7.04E-K34 7.46E+06 2.82E+07 7.04E-I04 7.04E-K)4 7.04E+04
1.41E407 4.24E+05 5.53E+03 6.26E-K)4 9.63E+03 1.52E+05 6.26E+04 6.64E-K)6 4.19E-K35 6.26E+04 6.26E-H% 6.26E-+04
1.08E+03 9.80Ef02 4.68E402 3.76E-HD2 3.72E+02 2.90E+02 6.18E-K)2 3.75E+02 5.9lE-K)2 6.15E-K)2 2.96E+02 6.85E+O2
4.82E+01 4.22EK)I 1.77E+01 1.00E-K)1 1.45E-HD1 1.46E-K3I 1.85E+01 9.92E+00 3.06E+01 4.71E+01 1.07E+01 5.53E+01
2.54E+07 1.46E-t06 9.55EI07 5.97EK)5 3.91E+03 1.81Ef05 6.37E+05 5.98E405 2.87E4O7 6.37Ef05 6.38Ef05 6.37E+05
2.26E407 1.30E-+06 1.91E+03 5.32EW5 5.45E+03 3.35E405 5.67E+05 5.33E+05 8.07E4O5 5.68E405 5.69E405 5.67E+05
5.87E+04 5.49E-W4 3.37E-K>4 2.91E+04 2.49E+04 2.09E+04 3.81E+04 2.76E4O4 3.65E+04 3.42E+04 2.00E-K)4 4.68E-KX*
1.30E+03 1.21E+03 7.43E+02 6.41E+02 5.49E402 4.61E-H32 8.41E4O2 6.09E+02 8.05E+02 7.57E+02 4.41E+02 1.02E+03
3.32E-K)! 5.46EfOO 1.03EK)3 7.32E-KX) 4.88E-01 1.43E-02 1.02EWO 4.46EK)! 3.03E+02 1.02E+00 1.01E-KX) l.OOE+00
3.40E+04 6.00Ef03 1.17E+02 7.39E+03 1.48E+04 6.87E+05 4:50EK)2 1.40E+04 2.61E+04 1.06E+03 5.62Ef03 9.12E+02
2.59E-K33 2.48Ef03 2.00Ef03 1.85E-+03 2.12E403 1.56Ef03 1.77E403 1.86E+03 2.09E+03 2.14E403 7.96E+02 2.40E+03
5.33E-+01 5.12E401 4.12E-4O1 3.80EK)1 4.36E-K)! 3.21EW1 3.65E-K)! 3.83E-H31 4.30E-K)! 4.40E-K)! 1.64E401 4.94E+01
7.37E403 1.15E-K)3 9.34E404 1.49EM-03 1.03E«)2 3.02E-HX) 1.55E402 9.11E+03 2.78E404 1.56EK)2 1.52E402 1.50E402
2.I7E-KB 3.19E+02 7.70E+00 4.18BK)2 3.14EKJ3 1.03E+02 2.51E+01 1.01E-f03 2.79EK)2 3.55EK)! 6.44EK)! 2.70E+01
1.86E406 1.76E406 1.25E+06 l.llE-f06 1.11E-HD6 8.72E405 1.23E+06 1.09E+06 1.32E+06 1.30E-f06 6.14E+05 1.61E+06
4.02E+04 3.81E+04 2.68E-K)4 2.39E+04 2.39E4O4 1.87E+04 2.66E4O4 2.35EK)4 2.84E+04 2.81E404 1.32E+04 3.45E+04
5.38E+02 1.35E-f02 6.97E-K)4 8.44E-K)! 7.17EK)! 2.83E+01 7.93E-K)! 8.42E+03 2.05E+04 8.00E401 7.69E401 7.62E+01
2.37E402 2.83E+01 7.57E-HX) 1.63EK)! 3.I8E+03 2.57E-HD1 4.17E+00 3.85E+02 1.54E402 1.05E401 2.02E+01 4.88E+00
9.43E+06 8.72Ef06 8.28E-KD6 7.54EK16 7.92E-K)6 6.81E+06 7.87E406 7.04Ef06 8.33E+06 8.74E406 6.93E+06 6.74E+06
1.65E405 1.52E+05 1.44Ef05 1.31E+05 1.38E405 1.17E405 1.35E-+05 1.23E+05 1.45E405 1.52Et05 1.17E+05 1.20E+05
6.52E-H)6 3.81EK)5 1.08E-W7 2.58EK)6 1.18E+03 4.56E+04
5.80E+06 2.91E405 9.05E401 2.16EK)6 2.04E402 1.77E4O4
1.32E404 1.19E+04 4.94E403 3.93E+03 4.19Ef03 2.38E-+03
4.42E-K)2 3.97E+02 1.66E-f02 1.28Ef02 1.46E+02 8.07EK)1
3.78E-K)5 8.20E-f05 7.84E+07 2.52Ef06 2.22E+03 8.84E+04
2.44EH)5 5.32E-K)5 1.15E-02 1.63E406 4.52E-+03 1.80E-K)5
5.26E401 4.87E-HD1 4.33E-HD1 3.93E401 4.11E+01 3.08EK)1
1.02E-KX) 9.45E-O1 8.40E-O1 7.62E-01 7.97E-01 5.97E-01
1.48E+05 2.30E+06 3.58E-K)6 1.48E+05 1.
8.17E+04 1.00EH36 3.39E+05 8.17E+04 8,
7.34E+03 4.36E+03 6.47E+03 6.29E+03 3,
2.42E-+O2 1.42E+02 2.22E402/2.28E+02 1,
8.10EK15 1.46EK)7 2.37E+07/8.10E-K)5 8,
5.26E405 9.44E-f06 5.67EK)3 5.26EK)5 5,
3.52EH)1 4.25E-K)! 4.39E-K)! 4.62E-K)! 2.
6.82E-01 8.24E-01 8.51E-01 8.95E-01 4.
48E-K)5 1.48E405
18EKXf 8.17E4O4
97E4O3 6.72E403
32E-f02 2.62E+02
10E405 8.10E-HD5
26EK)5 5.26E+05
38E401 4.49EHD1
62E-01 8.70E-01
c_
I
Lo
-------
J-37
Table J.13 Health effects conversion factors for internal pathways
Nucl ide
U-238
U-234
Ra-226
Rn-222
Pb-214
Bi-214
Pb-210
Po-210
Table J.14
Organ
Endosteal
Red Marrow
Lung
Liver
Stomach Wai 1
LLI Wall
Thyroid
Kidney
Muscle
Ovaries
Testes
Somatic
(fatal cancers/Ci intake)
Inhalation Ingestion
3.67xl03 4.79X101
4.14xl03 5.38X101
4.21xl03 l.OlxlO2
4.51xlO"2 5.64
4.15 6.47xlO"2
3.04 3.34xlO"2
5.31xl02 3.94X101
3.50xl03 9.67X101
Health effects conversion factors
Somatic
(fatal cancers/rem)
4.35xlO"6
4.59xlO"5
8.59xlO"5
2.20xlO"5
1.23xlO"5
9.81xlO"6
1.20xlO"5
4.90xlO"6
9.31xlO"5
2.46xlO"6
2.46xlO"6
Genetic
(genetic defects/Ci intake)
Inhalation Ingestion
8.07X101 7.20X101
9.57X101 8.55X101
8.57xl02 7.65xl02
1.49xlO"3 1.49
2.30X10"1 4.24xlO"2
1.13X10"1 7.81xlO"3
1.69xl02 7.82X101
1.21xl03 7.84xl02
for external pathways
Genetic
(genetic defects/rem)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3.00xlO"4
3.00xlO"4
-------
J-38
J.29 References
Ba79 Baes, C. F., Ill, 1979, "The Soil Loss Constant \Sl Due to Leaching
from Soils", in "A Statistical Analysis of Selected Parameters for
Predicting Food Chain Transport and Internal Dose of Radionuclides",
Oak Ridge National Laboratory Report, ORNL/NUREG/TM-282.
DOA73 U.S. Department of Agriculture, New Mexico Crop and Livestock
Reporting Service, Las Cruces, NM, 1973, "New Mexico Agricultural
Statistics-1972".
DOA79 U.S. Department of Agriculture, Wyoming Crop and Livestock Re-
porting Service, Cheyenne, WY, 1979, "Wyoming Agricultural
Statistics-1978".
Du80 Dunning, D.E., Jr., Leggett, R.W., and Yalcintas, N.G., 1980, "A
Combined Methodology for Estimating Dose Rates and Health Effects
from Radioactive Pollutants", Oak Ridge National Laboratory Report,
ORNL/TM-7105.
EPA77 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Radiation Programs,
1977, "Technical Support of Standards for High-Level Radioactive Waste
Management, Task C Report, Assessment of Migration Pathways", Prepared
by Arthur D. Little, Inc., EPA 520/4-79-007C.
HEW70 U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, U.S. Public Health
Service, Bureau of Radiological Health, 1970, "Radiological Health Hand-
book", PHS Publication No. 2016.
Ki76 Killough, G.G., and McKay, L.R., 1976, "A Methodology for Calculating
Radiation Doses from Radioactivity Releases to the Environment", Oak
Ridge National Laboratory Report, ORNL-4992.
-------
J-39
Mo79 Moore, R.E., et al., 1979, "AIRDOS-EPA: A Computerized Methodology
for Estimating Environmental Concentrations and Dose to Man from Air-
borne Releases of Radionuclides", U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Report, EPA 520/1-79-009 (Reprint of ORNL-5532).
Ne78 Nelson, C., Davis, R., and Fowler, T., 1978, "A Model to Assess Popu-
lation Inhalation Exposure from a Transuranium Element Contaminated
Land Area" in "Selected Topics: Transuranium Elements in the General
Environment", Criteria and Standards Division, Office of Radiation
Programs, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Technical Note, ORP/
CSD-78-1.
NRC76 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Office of Standards Development,
1976, "Calculation of Annual Dose to Man from Routine Releases of
Reactor Effluents for the Purpose of Evaluating Compliance with 10 CFR
Part 50, Appendix I", Regulatory Guide 1.109.
NRC77 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Office of Standards Development,
1977, "Calculation of Annual Dose to Man from Routine Releases of Re-
actor Effluents for the Purpose of Evaluating Compliance with 10 CFR
Part 50, Appendix I", Regulatory Guide 1.109, Revision.
S£68 Slade, D.H., 1968, "Meteorology and Atomic Energy - 1968", U.S. Depart-
ment of Commerce, Environmental Science Services Administration, Air
Resources Laboratories, TID-24190.
Sn75 Snyder, W.S., et al, 1975, "Report of the Task Group on Reference Man",
International Commission on Radiological Protection, ICRP Report No. 23.
TGLD66 Task.Group on Lung Dynamics, 1966, "Deposition and Retention Models
for Internal Dosimetry of the Human Respiratory Tract", Health Phys. _12_,
173-207.
-------
J-40
Th72 Thompson, S.E., Burton, C.A., Quinn, D.J. and Ng, Y.C., 1972, "Concen-
tration Factors of Chemical Elements in Edible Aquatic Organisms",
University of California, Lawrence Livermore Laboratory Report, UCRL-
50564, Rev. 1.
UN77 United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation,
1977, "Sources and Effects of Ionizing Radiation".
WS677 Wyoming State Government, Department of Administration and Fiscal
Control, Division of Research and Statistics, 1977, "Wyoming Data
Handbook-1977".
-------
APPENDIX K
AIRBORNE PATHWAY MODELING
-------
K-l
K.I Generic Sites
Two generic sites were selected to represent locations where various
uranium mines are present. The characteristics of these sites, as shown in
Table K.I, were used in the AIRDOS-EPA code (Mo79).
Table K.I Characteristics of the generic sites
New Mexico
(Ambrosia Lake)
Wyoming
(Gas Hills)
Meteorological data:
Stability Categories
Period of Record:
Annual Rainfall:
Average Mixing Height:
Atmospheric dispersion
factors (Chi/Q) for
maximum individual:
gases
particulates
Grants/Gnt-Milan (WBAN=93057)
A-F
54/01-54/12
20 cm
800 m
Mean Ambient Temperature: 13.8°C
5.5 E-6 sec/in,
1.4 E-6 sec/nr
Population: (0-80 km): 3.60E+4 persons
Dairy Cattle (0-80 km):
Meat Animals (0-80 km):
Vegetable Crop Area:
(0-80 km)
2.30E+3 head
8.31E+4 head
2.78E+3 ha
Casper (WBAN-24089)
A-G
67/01-71/12
29 cm
500 m
7.4°C
2.5 E-6 sec/mf
1.0 E-6 sec/nr
1.43E+4 persons
1.17E+3 head
1.03E+5 head
3.20E+3 ha
The model active and inactive underground mines were assumed to be situ-
ated at the New Mexico site (see Section 2 ). The Wyoming site was used for
both the model active and inactive surface mines and the model in situ leach
mine (see Section 2 ).
-------
K-2
K.2 Meteorological Data
Joint frequency distributions by stability category were obtained from
the National Climatic Center (NOAA-Asheville, NC). These distributions are
identified in Table K.I by location, stability category range, and period of
record.
The average mixing height (Table K.I) is the distance between the ground
surface and a stable layer of air where no further mixing occurs. This
average was computed by determining the harmonic mean of the annual morning
mixing height and the annual afternoon mixing height for the location (Ho72).
The rainfall rate determines the value used for the scavenging coefficient.
No attempt was made to be any more accurate than one significant figure for
both average mixing height and scavenging coefficient. Both sites are
relatively dry locations, as reflected by a scavenging coefficient of 2.0 x
10 sec . A dry deposition velocity of 1 cm/s was assigned to
particulates, while radon was assumed to be non-depositing.
K.3 Population
The population data for both generic sites were generated by a computer
program (At74) that uses an edited and compressed version of the 1970 United
States Census Bureau's "Master Enumeration District List with Coordinates"
containing housing and population counts for each census enumeration district
(CED) and the geographic coordinates of the population centroid for the
district. In the Standard Metropolitan Statistical Areas, the CED is usually
a "block group" that consists of a physical city block. In other areas, the
district used is called an "enumeration district", and it may cover several
square miles in a rural area.
There are approximately 250,000 CED's in the United States and the
average population is about 800. The position of the population centroid for
each CED was marked on the district maps by the individual census official
responsible for each district and is based only on his judgment from
inspection of the population distribution on the map. The CED entries are
sorted in ascending order by longitude on the final data tape.
K.4 Dairy and Meat Animals
Dairy cattle and meat animal distributions are part of the AIRDOS-EPA
-------
K-3
input. A constant animal density is assumed. The animal densities are pro-
vided by state in Table K.2. These densities were derived from information
developed by NRC (NRC75). Milk production density in units of
liter/day-square mile was converted to number of dairy cattle/square kilo-
meter by assuming a milk production rate of 11.0 liters/day per dairy cow.
Meat production density in units of kilograms/day-square mile was changed to
an equivalent number of meat animals/square kilometer by assuming a slaughter
rate of 0.00381 day" and 200 kilograms of meat/animal slaughtered.
Table K.2 Animal and vegetable crop distributions
for use with AIRDOS-EPA
State
New Mexico
Wyoming
Dairy Cattle
Density
(No. /km2)
1.14E-1
5.79E-2
Meat Animal
Density
(No. /km2)
4.13
5.12
Vegetable
Crop Fraction
(Km2/ km2)
1.38E-3
1.59E-3
K.5 Vegetable Crop Area
A certain fraction of the land within 80 km of the source is used for
vegetable crop production, which is assumed to be uniformly distributed
throughout the entire assessment area. Information on the vegetable pro-
duction density in terms of kilograms(fresh weight)/day-square mile was
obtained from NRC data (NRC75). The vegetable crop fractions (Table K.2) by
state were computed from the production densities by assuming a production
rate of 2 kilograms (fresh weight)/year-square meter (NRC77).
K.6 Food Intake
Table K.3 summarizes the ingestion values used for both generic sites
for the maximum individual. These values are based on a USDA report (USDA72)
for a rural farm situation. Fl and F2 are the percentages produced at the
-------
K-4
individual's home and within the 80 km assessment area, respectively. The
balance of the diet, F3, is considered to be imported from outside the assess-
ment area with negligible radionuclide concentrations due to the assessed
source. The Fl values are obtained by dividing the home-produced quantity by
the quantity from all sources. The meat values include a combination of beef
and pork. The vegetable values only include fresh vegetables.
Table K.3 Sources of food for the maximum individual (percent)
Vegetables
Meat
Milk
Fl
70.0
44.2
39.9
F2
0.0
0.0
0.0
F3
30.0
55.8
60.1
For population exposure estimates, the AIRDOS-EPA code determines the
imported fraction needed to supply the nutritional requirements of the entire
population within 80 km. The quantity of food that is not imported is
assumed to be grown or produced throughout the entire assessment area and
consumed by the population within the assessment area as an average value for
the entire assessment area. The surplus food grown at a given site we
assumed was shipped outside the assessment area. We did not calculate dose
for this exported fraction.
The ingestion pathway is handled by the terrestrial model (NRC77) por-
tion of the AIRDOS-EPA code. The input values shown in Table K.4 were used
and are independent of location and radionuclide. Selected terrestrial
pathway parameters, which are radionuclide dependent, are given in Table K.5.
K.7 AIRDOS-EPA Output
An example output of AIRDOS-EPA can be found in the AIRDOS-EPA manual
(Mo79). Doses calculated by AIRDOS-EPA were not used in this report.
Another code, DARTAB, performed dose and risk estimates based on air and
ground concentrations and ingestion and inhalation intakes and working levels
calculated by AIRDOS-EPA. An explanation of the DARTAB code can be found in
-------
Table K.4 Selected Input Parameters to AIRDOS-EPA
SYMBOLIC
VARIABLE
PR
PH
BRTHRT
T
DD1
TSUBH1
TSUBH2
TSUBH3
TSUBH4
LAMW
TSUBE1
TSUBE2
YSUBV1
YSUBV2
FSUBP
FSUBS
QSUBF
TSUBF
DESCRIPTION
Plume rise
Release height
Human breathing rate
Buildup time for surface deposition
Fraction of radioactivity retained on
leafy vegetables and produce after washing
Time delay-ingestion of pasture grass by animals
Time delay-ingestion of stored feed by animals
Time delay-ingestion of leafy vegetables by man
Time delay-ingestion of produce by man
Removal rate constant for physical loss by weathering
Period of exposure during growing season-pasture grass
Period of exposure during growing season-crops
or leafy vegetables
Agricultural productivity by unit area (grass-cow-mi Ik-
man pathway)
Agricultural productivity by unit area (produce or
leafy vegetables ingested by man)
Fraction of year animals graze or pasture
Fraction of daily feed that is pasture grass when
animals graze on pasture
Consumption rate of contaminated feed or forage by
an animal (dry weight)
Transport time from animal feed-mil k-man
VALUE
0.0 m
1.0 m
9.17E+5 cm3/hr
source dependent
1.0
0.0 hr
2.16E+3 hr
3.36E+2 hr
3.36E+2 hr
2.1E-3 hr"1
7.2E+2 hr
1.44E+3 hr
0.28 kg/m2
0.716 kg/m2
0.40
0.43
15.6 kg/day
2.0 days
tn
-------
Table K.4 (Continued)
SYMBOLIC
VARIABLE
UV
UM
UF
UL
TSUBS
FSUBG
FSUBL
TSUBB
P
TAUBEF
MSUBB
VSUBM
Rl
R2
DESCRIPTION
Rate of ingestion of produce by man
Rate of ingestion of milk by man
Rate of ingestion of meat by man
Rate of ingestion of leafy vegetables by man
Average time from slaughter of meat animal to
consumption
Fraction of produce ingested grown in garden of interest
Fraction of leafy vegetables grown in garden of interest
Period of long-term buildup for activity in soil
Effective surface density of soil (dry weight)
(assumes 15 cm plow layer)
Fraction of meat producing herd slaughtered per day
Muscle mass of meat producing animal at slaughter
Milk production of cow
Fallout interception fraction for pasture
Fallout interception for vegetable crops
VALUE
1.76E+2 kg/yr(a)
1.12E+2 1/yr
85.0 kg/yr
18.0 kg/yr
20.0 days
1.0
1.0
Same as T
2.15E+2 kg/m2
3.81E-3 day"1
2.0E+2 kg
11.0 I/day
0.57
0.20
^a'This value, which was used in our analysis, is conservative because it includes fruit consumption.
Without fruit consumption, the ingestion rate is 122 kg/yr.
CTl
-------
Table K.5 Selected terrestrial pathway parameters by radionuclide
Milk-transfer
Meat-transfer
Radionuclide
Uranium-238
Uranium-235
Uranium-234
Thorium-232
Thorium-230
Thorium-228
Actinium-228
Radium-228
Radium-226
Radium-224
Radon-222
Bismuth-214
Bismuth-212
Lead-214
Lead-212
Lead-210
Polonium-210
Thallium-208
IH* 1 1 V II W 1 1 1 1 1^^ 1 1 W W 1 *|
Removal Rate (day )
7.06E-7
7.06E-7
7.06E-7
5.61E-8
5.61E-8
5.61E-8
2.12E-6
2.12E-5
2.12E-5
2.12E-5
0.0
2.09E-4
2.09E-4
5.31E-7
5.31E-7
5.31E-7
8.93E-6
9.84E-4
Bivl J
2.1E-2
2.1E-2
2.1E-2
6.3E-3
6.3E-3
6.3E-3
l.OE-2
l.OE-1
l.OE-1
l.OE-1
0.0
6.0E-1
6.0E-1
1.4E-1
1.4E-1
1.1E-1
4.2E-3
l.OE+0
R C3)
Biv2
4.2E-3
4.2E-3
4.2E-3
3.5E-4
3.5E-4
3.5E-4
2.5E-3, .
7.2E-2' '
7'2E~2frl
7.2E-2^ '
0.0
1.5E-1
1.5E-1
4.8E-3
4.8E-3
3.9E-3
2.6E-4
2.5E-1
W t. 1 1 1 \+ 1 V. 1 1 I*
Fm(day/l)
1.4E-4
1.4E-4
1.4E-4
5.0E-6
5.0E-6
5.0E-6
2.0E-5
5.9E-4
5.9E-4
5.9E-4
0.0
5.0E-4
5.0E-4
8.7E-5
8.7E-5
9.9E-5
1.2E-4
2.3E-2
\svsv«i i iN*iwiit*
Ff (day/kg)
1.6E-6
1.6E-6
1.6E-6
1.6E-6
1.6E-6
1.6E-6
1.6E-6
5.0E-4
5.0E-4
5.0E-4
0.0
1.7E-2
1.3E-2
9.1E-4
9.1E-4
9.1E-4
8.7E-3
4.0E-2
(a)
(b)
B. , = Radionuclide concentration in entire above-ground portion of pasture grasses at maturity per unit dry weight
Radionuclide concentration in soil per unit dry weight
= pCi/kg dry weight
pCi/kg dry soil
B. 2 = Radionuclide concentration in edible portion of leafy vegetables and fresh produce at maturity per unit
fresh weight
Radionuclide concentration in soil per unit dry weight
= pCi/kg wet weight
pCi/kg dry soil
'c'This value, which was used in our analysis is conservatively high.
vegetables and grain products, a more realistic value would be 2.6E-3.
Using data from DeBortoli (De72) for
-------
K-8
Appendix L. Concentrations and intakes computed by AIRDOS-EPA are by radionu-
clide and receptor location. Table K.6 lists values for effective radio-
active decay constants, assumed for the plume (air) and ground surface, which
influence the concentration and intake estimates. The values chosen for the
decay constants attempt to account for daughter buildup in the air and on the
ground surface.
Table K.6 Effective radioactive decay constants
Radionuclide
Decay constant in
plume (day" )
Decay constant on
ground surface (day~ )
Uranium- 2 38
Uranium-235
Uranium-234
Thorium-232
Thorium-230
Thorium-228
Actinium-228
Radium-228
Radium- 2 26
Radium-224
Radon-222
Bismuth-214
Bismuth-212
Lead-214
Lead-212
Lead-210
Polonium-210
Thallium-208
4.25E-13
2.68E-12
7.77E-9
1.35E-13
2.47E-8
9.92E-4
2.72E+0
3.30E-4
1.19E-6
1.89E-1
1.81E-1
1.81E-1
1.35E-13
1.81E-1
1.35E-13
8.52E-5
5.02E-3
1.35E-13
4.25E-13
2.68E-12
7.77E-9
1.35E-13
2.47E-8
1.35E-13
1.35E-13
1.35E-13
1.19E-6
1.35E-13
1.81E-1
1.19E-6
1.35E-13
1.19E-6
1.35E-13
1.19E-6
1.19E-6
1.35E-13
-------
K-9
K.8 References
At74 Athey, T.W., Tell, R.A. and Janes, D.E., 1974, "The Use of an Automated
Data Base in Population Exposure Calculations", from Population Exposures,
Health Physics Society, Conf-74018.
De72 DeBortoli, M. and Gaglione, P., 1972, "Radium-226 in Environmental
Materials and Foods", Health Phys. £2, 43-48.
Ho72 Holzworth, 6.C., 1972, "Mixing Heights, Wind Speeds, and Potential for
Urban Air Pollution Throughout the Contiguous United States", U.S. Office
of Air Programs, Report AP-101.
Mo79 Moore, R.E., et al., 1979, "AIRDOS-EPA: A Computerized Methodology
for Estimating Environmental Concentrations and Dose to Man from Air-
borne Releases of Radionuclides", EPA 520/1-79-009 (Reprint of ORNL-5532).
NRC75 Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Radiological Assessment Branch, Division
of Technical Review, 1975, "Code Input Data for Man-Rem Estimates", memo
by K. Eckerman, N. Dayem and R. Emch.
NRC77 Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Office of Standards Development, 1977,
"Calculation of Annual Doses to Man from Routine Releases of Reactor
Effluents for the Purpose of Evaluating Compliance with 20 CFR Part 50,
Appendix I", Regulatory Guide 1.109, Revision 1, October 1977.
USDA72 United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service,
1972, "Food Consumption of Households in the United States (Seasons and Year
1965-1966)", Household Food Consumption Survey 1965-1966, Report No. 12.
-------
APPENDIX L
HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY
-------
L-l
L.I Airborne Emissions
v\le estimated the health impact risks of airborne radionuclide emissions
with the DARTAB (Be80) computer code using external exposure input data (air
concentration and ground surface concentration) and internal intake input
data (inhalation and ingestion) from the AIRDOS-EPA (Mo79) computer code.
For radon-222 daughter calculations, we performed a working level calculation
using the AIRDOS-EPA code and the working level exposures for each location
were used as input by the DARTAB code. We assumed the fraction of equili-
brium for the working level calculations to be 0.700 (Ge78). Doses calcu-
lated by AIRDOS-EPA were not used in DARTAB.
Tables L.I and L.2 contain the data used by DARTAB in the health impact
assessment, and Table L.3 is an example input data file for a DARTAB run. The
variables are described in the DARTAB manual (Be80). We calculated dose
rates and somatic health risks with DARTAB using a data base developed using
the RADRISK (Du80) computer code. The dose conversion factors for each
radionuclide are shown in Table L.I.
The doses calculated using DARTAB were not used in the risk calcu-
lations. We used the risk conversion factors in Table L.I for this purpose.
We calculated genetically significant doses for a 30-year exposure period
(the mean years of life where gonadal doses are genetically significant). In
calculating external dose rates from the ground surface, external dose con-
version factors for the ground surface (see Table L.I), which are for a per-
fect plane surface, are multiplied by 0.5 to correct for the roughness of the
soil surface. A weighted mean dose equivalent rate is calculated instead of
a total body dose equivalent rate. Weighting factors are chosen to have a
sum of one (see Table L.2). These weighted mean dose equivalent rates are
presented for perspective purposes and are not used in the risk calculations.
The somatic risk conversion factors for Rn-222 and particulate radionu-
clides (see Table L.I) are calculated based on external exposures and in-
ternal intakes existing for the cohort lifetime (70.7565 years average
-------
1-2
lifetime expectancy). When the exposure time for the calculated risks was
less than the expected lifetime for an individual, we calculated the risk by
multiplying the risk calculated by DARTAB with the ratio of the actual
exposure time to the average lifetime expectancy for an individual (e.g., the
DARTAB calculated risk is multiplied by 1/70.7565 for a one-year exposure
time). The risk conversion factor for Rn-222 in Table L.I is for Rn-222 only
and does not include the risk due to radon daughters. The risk due to radon
daughters was calculated using a working level calculation and the fatal lung
cancer risk conversion factor for a lifetime exposure given in Table L.2.
The somatic health impact for the regional population (fatal cancers per
year) is calculated at equilibrium for continuous exposure and is equal to
the additional fatal cancers committed over all time per year of exposure.
Genetic effect risks (effects/birth) to the descendants of the exposed
parent are calculated based on a 30-year exposure period. When the exposure
time for the calculated risks was less than 30 years, we calculated the risk
by multiplying the risk calculated by DARTAB with the ratio of the actual
exposure time to 30 years (e.g., the DARTAB calculated risk is multiplied by
1/30 for a one year exposure time). Since the presented genetic effect risk
is to descendants of the exposed individual or individuals, one cannot add
the individual somatic and genetic effect risks presented in this report.
The "genetic effects per year in the regional population due to radionuclide
releases from the mine are calculated for an equilibrium exposure situation.
The calculated genetic effects per year at equilibrium is equal to the
genetic effects committed over all time from one year exposure since the
total genetic damage expressed over all generations is equal to the value in
each generation reached after prolonged continuous exposure (UN77). The
genetic effects committed to the regional population are calculated using
risk coefficients (see Table L.2) that are based on a genetically significant
dose (GSD). The fraction of the population gonadal dose that is genetically
significant is 30/70.7565 where 30 is the mean individual reproductive life
in years and 70.7565 is the average individual lifetime expectancy in years.
For each model uranium mine site, calculations are done separately for
each mine source as well as for the total source term for the evaluated mine.
The additional runs for each source allows us to identify the percentage
contribution of each source to the total risk. The tables in Chapter 6
-------
L-3
reflect results for the total mine source term and tables in Appendix L
present the risk by source term as well as the total risk for each model
uranium mine type. Tables L.4-L.6 contain individual fatal cancer risks and
Tables L.7-L.9 contain genetic effect risks.
L.2 Aqueous Emissions
The health effects conversion factors used in the aquatic pathways are
based on information contained in the RADRISK data library (Du80). The
RADRISK data library is the data base used by the DARTAB computer code in
computing the health impact of airborne releases. Thus, most of the
philosophy of health impact determination discussed in Section L.I above
applies to aquatic releases as well as to airborne releases. The numerical
values for the health effects conversion factors used for the aquatic
releases are given in Appendix J along with additional discussions of the use
of these factors in the.aquatic calculations.
-------
L-4
TABLE L.I
RADIONUCLIDE DOSE RATE AND HEALTH EFFECT RISK CONVERSION
FACTORS USED IN URANIUM MINE ASSESSMENTS
FOR NUCLIDE : U-238, RESP CLEARANCE CLASS=Y, PARTICLE SIZE=1.0 AMAD, F1=0.200E-02
DOSE CONVERSION FACTORS
ORGAN
R MAR
ENDOST
*PUL*
MUSCLE
LIVER
S WALL
PANCREAS
LLI WALL
KIDNEYS
BL WALL
ULI WALL
SI WALL
OVARIES
TESTES
SPLEEN
UTERUS
THYMUS
THYROID
INGEST I ON
LOW LET
(A)
9.64E-07
1.96E-06
1.37E-09
7.06E-09
6.07E-09
4.31E-08
6.74E-09
9.76E-06
5.94E-07
4.57E-09
1.73E-06
1.58E-07
1.45E-08
6.04E-09
6.59E-09
7.76E-09
6.12E-09
6.01E-09
HIGH LET
(A)
1.53E-07
5.63E-06
2.43E-09
2.76E-08
2.62E-08
1.81E-07
2.76E-08
7.94E-06
2.92E-06
1.50E-08
2.64E-06
4.48E-07
2.63E-08
2.64E-08
2.76E-08
2.77E-08
2.76E-08
2.76E-08
INHALATION
LOW LET
(A)
3.34E-05
6.52E-05
1.62E-02
2.53E-06
5.38E-06
6.41E-06
3.29E-06
2.05E-04
1.70E-05
7.15E-07
6.94E-05
1.22E-05
1.42E-06
1.19E-06
3.13E-06
1.38E-06
4.80E-06
2.16E-06
HIGH LET
(A)
3.89E-06
1.43E-04
4.13E-02
7.08E-07
6.71E-07
1.67E-07
7.08E-07
4.71E-06
7.47E-05
3.85E-07
1.61E-06
3.23E-07
6.71E-07
6.75E-07
7.08E-07
7.07E-07
7.08E-07
7.07E-07
AIR
IMMERSION
(B)
3.08E+05
3.47E+05
1.26E+05
2.37E+05
8.53E+04
1.07E+05
7.63E+04
8.18E+04
9.06E+04
6.58E+04
6.92E+04
6.22E+04
9.60E4-04
2.62E+05
8.91E+04
2.36E+04
9.25E+04
1.58E+05
GROUND
SURFACE
(C)
232.
271.
85.9
329.
29.7
72.6
57.6
84.1
30.4
21.4
22.8
20.8
53.2
389.
45.8
7.70
30.4
70.5
GENETICALLY SIGNIFICANT DOSE CONVERSION FACTORS FOR 30 YEAR EXPOSURE PERIOD
(D) (D) (D) (D) (E) (F)
TESTES 1.55E-07 7.20E-07 1.73E-05 1.55E-05 7.86E+06 1.17E+04
OVARIES 4.03E-07 7-17E-07 2.27E-05 1.54E-05 2.88E+06 1.60E+03
AVERAGE 2.79E-07 7.19E-07 2.00E-05 1.55E-05 5.37E+06 6.63E+03
CANCER
R MARROW
ENDOST
PULMNARY
BREAST
LIVER
ST WALL
PANCREAS
LLI WALL
KIDNEYS
BL WALL
ULI WALL
SI WALL
OVARIES
TESTES
SPLEEN
UTERUS
THYMUS
THYROID
FATAL CANCER RISK
INGESTION
LOW LET
(G)
2.27E-07
4.22E-08
5.33E-10
2.42E-09
8.26E-10
3.72E-09
7.07E-10
6.77E-07
1.89E-08
1.42E-10
6.00E-08
2.73E-09
2.36E-10
9.20E-11
9.96E-11
1.21E-10
9.22E-11
4.61E-10
GENETIC EFFECT RISK
AVERAGE
(J)
8.37E-14
HIGH LET
(G)
7.62E-07
1.22E-06
1.48E-08
1.02E-08
3.78E-08
1.57E-07
3.10E-08
5. 5 IE- 06
9.29E-07
4.85E-09
9.16E-07
7.78E-08
4.21E-09
4.23E-09
4.43E-09
4.43E-09
4.43E-09
2.22E-09
CONVERSION
(J)
2.16E-11
CONVERSION FACTORS
INHALATION
LOW LET
(G)
7.15E-06
1.26E-06
6.32E-03
5.92E-07
4.73E-07
4.72E-07
2.38E-07
1-32E-05
4.49E-07
1.41E-08
2.23E-06
1.94E-07
1.44E-08
1.12E-08
3.23E-08
1.34E-08
5.02E-08
1..19E-07
FACTORS
(J)
6.00E-12
HIGH LET
(G)
1.77E-05
2.78E-05
.238
2.24E-07
8.33E-07
1.36E-07
6.83E-07
3.22E-06
2.04E-05
1.07E-07
5.48E-07
5.40E-08
9.26E-08
9.30E-08
9.75E-08
9.75E-08
9.76E-08
5.13E-08
(J)
4.65E-10
FOR LIFETIME EXPOSURE
AIR GROUND
IMMERSION
(H)
.100
1.07E-02
7.67E-02
9.46E-02
1.33E-02
9.28E-03
9.27E-03
5.68E-03
3.14E-03
2.28E-03
2.40E-03
1.08E-03
1.67E-03
4.55E-03
1.55E-03
4.09E-04
1.61E-03
1.34E-02
(K)
1.61E+00
SURFACE
(I)
7.55E-05
8.34E-06
5.23E-05
1.31E-04
4.64E-06
6.30E-06
7.00E-06
5.84E-06
1.05E-06
7.43E-07
7.91E-07
3.61E-07
9.23E-07
6.75E-06
7.95E-07
1.34E-07
5.27E-07
5.97E-06
(L)
2.00E-03
TABLE OF UNITS
70 YEAR COMMITTED DOSE (MILLIRAD)/(PERSON PICOCURIE)
(MILLIRAD/YR)/(PERSON MICROCURIE/CC)
(MILLIRAD/YR)/(PERSON MICROCURIE/CM**2)
(MILLIRAD)/(PERSON PICOCURIE/YR)
(MILLIRAD)/(PERSON MECROCURIE/CC)
MILLIRAD)/(PERSON MICROCURIE/CM**2)
DEATHS)/(1E+5 PERSONS PICOCURIE/YR)
DEATHS)/(1E+5 PERSONS PICOCURIE/CC)
DEATHS)/(1E+5 PERSONS PICOCURIE/CM**2)
GENETIC EFFECTS/LIVE BIRTH)/(PERSON PICOCURIE/YR)
GENETIC EFFECTS/LIVE BIRTH)/(PERSON MICROCURIE/CC)
GENETIC EFFECTS/LIVE BIRTH) / (PERSON MECROCURIE/CM**2)
-------
L-5
TABLE L.I
(CONTINUED)
FOR NUCLIDE : U-234, RESP CLEARANCE CLASS=Y, PARTICLE SIZE=1
DOSE CONVERSION FACTORS
ORGAN INGESTION INHALATION AIR
LOW LET HIGH LET LOW LET HIGH LET IMMERSION
(A) (A) (A) (A) nn
R MAR
ENDOST
*PUL*
MUSCLE
LIVER
S WALL
PANCREAS
LLI WALL
KIDNEYS
BL WALL
ULI WALL
SI WALL
OVARIES
TESTES
SPLEEN
UTERUS
THYMUS
THYROID
4
1
2
2
1
4
2
2
8
2
7
1
5
1
1
4
9
8
GENETICALLY
TESTES
OVARIES
AVERAGE
3
1
8
.40E-09
.84E-08
.77E-11
.70E-10
.48E-10
.98E-08
.02E-10
-19E-06
.63E-09
.66E-10
.37E-07
.31E-07
.67E-09
.30E-10
.62E-10
.13E-10
.68E-11
.99E-11
2.07E-07
7.03E-06
2.76E-09
3.13E-08
3.13E-08
2.06E-07
3.13E-08
9.01E-06
3.32E-06
1.71E-08
3.00E-06
5.10E-07
3.13E-08
3.13E-08
3.13E-08
3.13E-08
3.13E-08
3.13E-08
1
4
2
1
4
5
1
1
2
1
4
7
5
2
3
2
3
6
.21E-07
.83E-07
-73E-04
.09E-07
.24E-08
.34E-08
.92E-08
.28E-06
.24E-07
.42E-09
.33E-07
.77E-08
.92E-09
.18E-09
.19E-08
.72E-09
.45E-08
.47E-09
SIGNIFICANT DOSE CONVERSION
(D)
.62E-09
.70E-07
.68E-08
(D)
8.55E-07
8.55E-07
8.55E-07
FATAL CANCER RISK
CANCER
4
1
1
(D)
.92E-08
.55E-07
.02E-07
5
1
4
8
8
1
8
5
8
4
1
3
8
8
8
8
-8
8
*
*
9
*
*
*
*
*
26E-06
78E-04
70E-02
01E-07
01E-07
89E-07
01E-07
34E-06
49E-05
37E-07
82E-06
68E-07
01E-07
01E-07
01E-07
01E-07
01E-07
01E-07
9
1
4
6
3
3
2
2
3
3
3
3
2
6
3
1
3
6
FACTORS FOR
1
1
1
CONVERSION
INGESTION
LOW LET
R MARROW
ENDOST
PULMNARY
BREAST .
LIVER
ST WALL
PANCREAS
LLI WALL
KIDNEYS
BL WALL
ULI WALL
SI WALL
OVARIES
TESTES
SPLEEN
UTERUS
THYMUS
THYROID
GENETIC
X
AVERAGE
1
3
1
1
2
4
2
1
2
9
2
2
9
2
2
7
1
7
(G)
.10E-09
.99E-10
.39E-11
.02E-10
.16E-11
.32E-09
.29E-11
.52E-07
-75E-10
.08E-12
.56E-08
.27E-09
.83E-11
.12E-12
.53E-12
.03E-12
.49E-12
.02E-12
EFFECT RISK
2
(J)
\ *^ /
.61E-14
HIGH LET
(G)
1.02E-06
1.52E-06
1.68E-08
1.15E-08
4.52E-08
1.78E-07
3. 5 IE- 08
6.25E-06
1.06E-06
5.51E-09
1.04E-06
8.85E-08
5.02E-09
5.02E-09
5.02E-09
5.02E-09
5.02E-09
2. 5 IE- 09
CONVERSION
(J)
2.57E-11
*
(D)
84E-05
84E-05
84E-05
FACTORS
2
8
1
.80E+05
.08E4-06
\J v U 1 v w
.68E+05
.15E+05
.76E+05
.72E+05
.87E+05
.90E+05
.75E+05
.20E+05
.14E+05
.07E+05
.96E+05
.85E+05
.50E+05
.77E+05
.35E+05
.18E+05
30 YEAR
(E)
.06E+07
.88E+06
.47E+07
.0 AMAD, F1=0.200E-02
GROUND
SURFACE
CO
\v-> /
422
^T <£
-------
L-6
TABLE L.I
(CONTINUED)
FOR NUCLIDE : TH-230, RESP CLEARANCE CLASS=Y, PARTICLE SIZE=
DOSE CONVERSION FACTORS
ORGAN INGESTION INHALATION AIR
R MAR
ENDOST
*PUL*
MUSCLE
LIVER
S WALL
PANCREAS
LLI WALL
KIDNEYS
BL WALL
ULI WALL
SI WALL
OVARIES
TESTES
SPLEEN
UTERUS
THYMUS
THYROID
LOW LET HIGH LET LOW LET HIGH LET
(A) (A) (A) (A)
2.21E-08 5.79E-05 5.23E-06 1.42E-02
1.19E-07 9.09E-04 2.91E-05 .223
1.65E-10 5.01E-11 3.09E-04 4.60E-02
1.11E-09 2.28E-07 3.01E-07 5.70E-05
3.49E-09 1.09E-06 9.01E-07 2.73E-04
5.76E-08 1.99E-07 l.OOE-07 1.29E-07
1.10E-09 2.28E-07 2.64E-07 5.70E-05
2.52E-06 8.83E-06 1.52E-06 5.18E-06
1.04E-09 2.28E-07 2.17E-07 5.70E-05
1.09E-09 1.14E-07 9.59E-08 2.85E-05
8.45E-07 2.94E-06 5.24E-07 1.73E-06
1.49E-07 4.97E-07 1.16E-07 3.03E-07
6.69E-09 2.28E-07 1.98E-07 5.70E-05
8.91E-10 2.28E-07 1.83E-07 5.70E-05
9.95E-10 2.28E-07 2.62E-07 5.70E-05
1.78E-09 2.28E-07 1.88E-07 5.70E-05
7.83E-10 2.28E-07 2.88E-07 5.70E-05
7.74E-10 2.28E-07 2.08E-07 5.70E-05
1.0 AMAD, F1=0.200E-03
GROUND
IMMERSION SURFACE
(B)
3.24E+06
3.54E+06
1.66E4-06
1.83E+06
1.40E+06
1.30E+06
1.03E+06
9.88E+05
1.38E+06
1.17E+06
1.20E+06
1.16E+06
1.04E+06
2.14E+06
1.32E+06
7.27E+05
1.29EH-06
2.16E+06
GENETICALLY SIGNIFICANT DOSE CONVERSION FACTORS FOR 30 YEAR
TESTES
OVARIES
AVERAGE
CANCER
R MARROW
ENDOST
PULMNARY
BREAST
LIVER
ST WALL
PANCREAS
LLI WALL
KIDNEYS
BL WALL
ULI WALL
SI WALL
OVARIES
TESTES
SPLEEN
UTERUS
THYMUS
THYROID
(D) (D) (D) (D)
2.38E-08 6.20E-06 3.96E-06 1.30E-03
1.97E-07 6.20E-06 4.24E-06 1.30E-03
1.11E-07 6.20E-06 4.10E-06 1.30E-03
FATAL CANCER RISK CONVERSION FACTORS
INGESTION INHALATION
LOW LET HIGH LET LOW LET HIGH LET
(G) (G) (G) (G)
4.76E-09 2.39E-04 l.OOE-06 5.36E-02
2.22E-09 1.70E-04 4.91E-07 3.76E-02
6.15E-11 3.05E-10 1.30E-04 .265
3.91E-10 8.35E-08 8.53E-08 1.80E-05
4.98E-10 1.57E-06 1.09E-07 3.39E-04
5.00E-09 1.72E-07 6.47E-09 1.09E-07
1.18E-10 2.54E-07 2.33E-08 5.49E-05
1.75E-07 6.13E-06 1.02E-07 3.55E-06
3.21E-11 7.26E-08 5.52E-09 1.57E-05
3.59E-11 3.63E-08 2.48E-09 7.85E-06
2.93E-08 1.02E-06 1.75E-08 5.92E-07
2.58E-09 8.62E-08 1.73E-09 5.17E-08
1.14E-10 3.63E-08 2.59E-09 7.85E-06
1.40E-11 3.63E-08 2.42E-09 7.85E-06
1.51E-11 3.63E-08 3.28E-09 7.85E-06
2.94E-11 3.63E-08 2.50E-09 7.85E-06
1.19E-11 3.63E-08 3.65E-09 7.85E-06
5.91E-11 1.82E-08 1.43E-08 4.14E-06
(E)
6.42E+07
3.12E+07
4.77E+07
(C)
884.
977.
438.
633.
339.
353.
274.
275.
335.
284.
289.
280.
270.
769.
329.
171.
310.
544.
EXPOSURE PERIOD
(F)
2.31E+04
8.10E+03
1.56E+04
FOR LIFETIME EXPOSURE
AIR
IMMERSION
(H)
1.05
.109
1.01
.730
.219
.113
.125
6.86E-02
4.79E-02
4.06E-02
4.16E-02
2.01E-02
1.80E-02
3.71E-02
2.29E-02
1.26E-02
2.24E-02
.183
GROUND
SURFACE
(D
2.88E-04
3.01E-05
2.66E-04
2.53E-04
5.29E-05
3.06E-05
3.33E-05
1.91E-05
1.16E-05
9.86E-06
l.OOE-05
4.86E-06
4.68E-06
1-33E-05
'5.71E-06
2.97E-06
5.38E-06
4.61E-05
GENETIC EFFECT RISK CONVERSION FACTORS
^
AVERAGE
(J) (J) (J) (J)
3.31E-14 1.86E-10 1.23E-12 3.90E-08
(K)
1.43E+01
(L)
4.68E-03
TABLE OF UNITS
70 YEAR COMMITTED DOSE (MILLIRAD)/(PERSON PICOCURIE)
(MILLIRAD/YR)/(PERSON MICROCURIE/CC)
(MILLIRAD/YR)/(PERSON MICROCURIE/CM**2)
(MILLIRAD)/(PERSON PICOCURIE/YR)
(MILLIRAD)/(PERSON MICROCURIE/CC)
(MILLIRAD)/(PERSON MICROCURIE/CM**2)
(DEATHS)/(1E+5 PERSONS PICOCURIE/YR)
(DEATHS)/(1E+5 PERSONS PICOCURIE/CC)
(DEATHS)/(1E+5 PERSONS PICOCURIE/CM**2)
(GENETIC EFFECTS/LIVE BIRTH)/(PERSON PICOCURIE/YR)
(GENETIC EFFECTS/LIVE BIRTH)/(PERSON MICROCURIE/CC)
(GENETIC EFFECTS/LIVE BIRTH)/(PERSON MICROCURIE/CM**2)
-------
TABLE L.I
(CONTINUED)
OR NUCLIDE : RA-226, RESP CLEARANCE CLASS=W, PARTICLE SIZE=
OSE CONVERSION FACTORS '
RGAN 1NGESTION INHALATION
LOW LET HIGH LET LOW LET HIGH LET
(A) (A) (A) (A)
MAR 2.54E-05 6.40E-05 2.84E-05 7.18E-05
NDOST 5.07E-05 1.13E-03 5.69E-05 1.27E-03
PUL* 1.91E-06 .0 6.33E-06 4.77E-03
USCLE 2.27E-06 2.83E-05 2.50E-06 3.17E-05
IVER 1.51E-06 2.65E-05 1.70E-06 2.98E-05
WALL 1.30E-06 2.08E-07 1.49E-06 1.21E-07
'ANCREAS 2.14E-06 2.83E-05 2.41E-06 3.17E-05
,LI WALL 4.15E-05 1.47E-05 2.38E-05 7.84E-06
IIDNEYS 2.01E-06 2.65E-05 2.21E-06 2.98E-05
IL WALL 1.58E-06 1.41E-05 1.56E-06 1.59E-05
(LI WALL 8.07E-06 3.58E-06 5.57E-06 1.94E-06
!I WALL 2.58E-06 4.63E-07 2.42E-06 2.59E-07
(VARIES 2.96E-06 2.83E-05 2.68E-06 3.17E-05
:ESTES 1.66E-06 2.83E-05 1.80E-06 3.17E-05
5PLEEN 1.56E-06 2.65E-05 1.75E-06 2.98E-05
ITERUS 1.75E-06 2.83E-05 1.73E-06 3.17E-05
[HYMUS 1.35E-06 2.83E-05 1.58E-06 3.17E-05
[HYROID 1.49E-06 2.83E-05 1.69E-06 3.17E-05
AIR
IMMERSION
(B)
5.49E+07
5.87E+07
3.37E+07
3.42E+07
2.91E+07
2.49E+07
2.19E+07
2.09E+07
2.76E+07
2.42E+07
2.69E+07
2.60E+07
2.00E+07
4.68E+07
2.95E+07
2.13E+07
2.89E+07
3.81E+07
L-/
1.0 AMAD, F1=0.200E+00
PROTTNn
SURFACE
(C)
1.21E+04
1.30E+04
7.43E+03
7.57E+03
6.41E+03
5.49E+03
4.84E+03
4.61E+03
6 .09E+03
5.35E+03
5.94E+03
5.74E+03
4.41E+03
1.03E+04
6.49E+03
4.68E+03
6.36E+03
8.41E+03
5ENETICALLY SIGNIFICANT DOSE CONVERSION FACTORS FOR 30 YEAR EXPOSURE PERIOD
(D) (D) (D) (D)
CESTES 2.69E-05 7.65E-04 2.82E-05 8.57E-04
)VARIES 6.17E-05 7.65E-04 5.00E-05 8.57E-04
AVERAGE 4.43E-05 7.65E-04 3.91E-05 8.57E-04
FATAL CANCER RISK CONVERSION FACTORS
DANCER INGESTION INHALATION
LOW LET HIGH LET LOW LET HIGH LET
(G) (G) (G) (G)
I MARROW 5.77E-06 3.37E-04 6.43E-06 3.78E-04
ENDOST 1.05E-06 2.34E-04 1.18E-06 2.63E-04
PULMNARY 6.95E-07 .0 3.32E-06 2.90E-02
BREAST 5.48E-07 1.04E-05 5.95E-07 1.16E-05
LIVER 1.42E-07 3.80E-05 1.60E-07 4.25E-05
3T WALL 7.19E-08 1.80E-07 8.39E-08 1.04E-07
PANCREAS 1.56E-07 3.15E-05 1.75E-07 3.53Er-05
LLI WALL 2.82E-06 1.02E-05 1.59E-06 5.43E-06
KIDNEYS 4.20E-08 8.45E-06 4.57E-08 9.46E-06
BL WALL 3.75E-08 4.50E-06 3.46E-08 5.04E-06
ULI WALL 2.59E-07 1.24E-06 1.69E-07 6.72E-07
SI WALL 3.36E-08 8.03E-08 2.93E-08 4.48E-08
DVARIES 3.81E-08 4.50E-06 3.16E-08 5.04E-06
EESTES 1.77E-08 4.50E-06 1.86E-08 5.04E-06
SPLEEN 1.64E-08 4.22E-06 1.83E-08 4.73E-06
JTERUS 2.09E-08 4.50E-06 1.94E-08 5.04E-06
CHYMUS 1.38E-08 4.50E-06 1.67E-08 5.04E-06
rHYROID 8.46E-08 2.26E-06 9.60E-08 2.53E-06
3ENETIC EFFECT RISK CONVERSION FACTORS
(J) (J) (J) (J)
AVERAGE 1.33E-11 2.29E-08 1.17E-11 2.56E-08
CABLE OF UNITS
(E)
1.40E+09
6.00E+08
l.OOE+09
(F)
3.09E+05
1.32E+05
2.21E+05
FOR LIFETIME EXPOSURE
AIR
IMMERSION
(H)
17.9
1.81
20.5
13.6
4.54
2.16
2.66
1.45
.958
.840
.934
.451
.347
.812
.512
.370
.501
3.23
(K)
3.00E+02
GROUND
SURFACE
(D
3.94E-03
4.00E-04
4.52E-03
3.02E-03
l.OOE-03
4.76E-04
5.88E-04
3.20E-04
2.11E-04
1.86E-04
2.06E-04
9.96E-05
7.65E-05
1.79E-04
1.13E-04
8.12E-05
1.10E-04
7.12E-04
/T \
(D
6.62E-02
(A - 70 YEAR COMMITTED DOSE (MILLIRAD) /(PERSON PICOCURIE)
(B - (MILLIRAD/YR) /(PERSON MICROCURIE/CC)
(C - (MILLIRAD/YR) /(PERSON MICROCURIE/CM**2)
(D - (MILLIRAD) /(PERSON PICOCURIE/YR)
E - MILLIRAD) /(PERSON MICROCURIE/CC)
F - MILLIRAD) /(PERSON MICROCURIE/CM**2)
G - DEATHS) /(1E+5 PERSONS PICOCURIE/YR)
H - DEATHS) /(1E+5 PERSONS PICOCURIE/CC)
flO - fPFNTfTTr PT7T7i?rT
-------
L-8
TABLE L.I
(CONTINUED)
FOR NUCLIDE : RN-222, RESP CLEARANCE CLASS=Y, PARTICLE SIZE=
DOSE CONVERSION FACTORS
ORGAN INGESTION INHALATION AIR
LOW LET
R MAR
ENDOST
*PUL*
MUSCLE
LIVER
S WALL
PANCREAS
LLI WALL
KIDNEYS
BL WALL
ULI WALL
SI WALL
OVARIES
TESTES
SPLEEN
UTERUS
THYMUS
THYROID
GENETICALLY
TESTES
OVARIES
AVERAGE
CANCER
R MARROW
ENDOST
PULMNARY
BREAST
LIVER
ST WALL
PANCREAS
LLI WALL
KIDNEYS
BL . WALL
ULI WALL
SI WALL
OVARIES
TESTES
SPLEEN
UTERUS
THYMUS
THYROID
(A)
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
HIGH LET
(A)
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
LOW LET
(A)
4.29E-11
4.84E-11
2.67E-09
3.29E-11
9.80E-11
2.08E-10
6.38E-11
1.02E-11
2.37E-10
7.87E-12
4.60E-11
8.80E-11
1-51E-11
7.59E-12
9.53E-11
1.60E-11
8.27E-11
2.67E-11
SIGNIFICANT DOSE CONVERSION
(D)
.0
.0
.0
FATAL
(D)
.0
.0
.0
CANCER RISK
INGESTION
LOW LET
(G)
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
GENETIC EFFECT RISK
AVERAGE
(J)
O.OOE-01
HIGH LET
(G)
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
CONVERSION
(J)
O.OOE-01
(D)
.0
.0
.0
HIGH LET
(A)
2.71E-10
1.66E-09
5.14E-08
4.96E-11
3.61E-10
1.40E-11
4.96E-11
2.05E-13
2.22E-09
2.48E-11
2.22E-12
6.38E-12
4.96E-11
4.96E-11
6.08E-10
4.96E-11
4.96E-11
4.96E-11
IMMERSION
(B)
2.48E+06
2.59E+06
2.00E+06
2.14E+06
1.85E+06
2.12E+06
1.19E+06
1.56E+06
1.86E+06
1.71E+06
1.74E+06
1.56E+06
7.96E+05
2.40E+06
2.27E+06
1.44E+06
1.31E+06
1.77E+06
FACTORS FOR 30 YEAR
(D)
.0
.0
.0
CONVERSION FACTORS
INHALATION -
LOW LET
(G)
1.39E-11
1.48E-12
1.63E-09
1.31E-11
1.53E-11
1.81E-11
7.74E-12
7.07E-13
8.23E-12
2.73E-13
1.60E-12
1.53E-12
2.62E-13
1.32E-13
1.65E-12
2.77E-13
1.43E-12
2.26E-12
FACTORS
(J)
O.OOE-01
HIGH LET
(G)
1.75E-09
5.05E-10
3.13E-07
1.98E-11
5.63E-10
1.22E-11
6.02E-11
1.42E-13
7.70E-10
8.60E-12
7.71E-13
1.11E-12
8.60E-12
8.60E-12
1.06E-10
8.60E-12
8.60E-12
4.20E-12
(J)
O.OOE-01
(E)
7.20E+07
2.39E+07
4.79E+07
1.0 AMAD, Fl=0.0
GROUND
SURFACE
(C)
512,
533.
412.
440.
380.
436.
246.
321.
383.
352.
359.
322.
164.
494.
468.
296.
270.
365.
EXPOSURE PERIOD
(F)
1.48E+04
4.92E+03
9.87E+03
FOR LIFETIME EXPOSURE
AIR
IMMERSION
(H)
.807
7.97E-02
1.22
.854
.289
.184
.145
.108
6.45E-02
5.93E-02
6.04E-02
2.71E-02
1.38E-02
4.16E-02
3.94E-02
2.50E-02
2.27E-02
,150
(K)
1.44E+01
GROUND
SURFACE
(I)
1.67E-04
1.64E-05
2.51E-04
1.76E-04
5.93E-05
3.78E-05
2.99E-05
2.23E-05
1.33E-05
1.22E-05
1.25E-05
5.59E-06
2.85E-06
8.57E-06
8.12E-06
5.14E-06
4.68E-061
3.09E-05
(L)
2.96E-03
TABLE OF UNITS
70 YEAR COMMITTED DOSE (MILLIRAD)/(PERSON PICOCURIE)
(MILLIRAD/YR)/ (PERSON MICROCURIE/CC)
(MILLIRAD/YR)/(PERSON MICROCURIE/CM**2)
(MILLIRAD)/(PERSON PICOCURIE/YR)
MILLIRAD)/(PERSON MICROCURIE/CC)
MILLIRAD)/(PERSON MICROCURIE/CM**2)
DEATHS)/(1E+5 PERSONS PICOCURIE/YR)
DEATHS)/(1E+5 PERSONS PICOCURIE/CC)
DEATHS)/ (1E+5 PERSONS PICOCURIE/CM**2)
GENETIC EFFECTS/LIVE BIRTH)/(PERSON PICOCURIE/YR)
(GENETIC EFFECTS/LIVE BIRTH)/(PERSON MICROCURIE/CC)
(GENETIC EFFECTS/LIVE BIRTH)/ (PERSON MICRO CURIE/CM** 2)
-------
TABLE L.I
(CONTINUED)
L-9
FOR NUCLIDE : PB-214, RESP aEARANCE CLASS=W, PARTICLE SIZE-1.0 AMAD, F1=0.200E+00
DOSE CONVERSION FACTORS
ORGAN INGE
LOW LET
(A)
R MAR 1.46E-08
ENDOST 7.30E-09
*PUL* 7.70E-09
MUSCLE 1.15E-08
LIVER 1.82E-08
S WALL 1.40E-06
PANCREAS 6.50E-08
LLI WALL 5.57E-08
KIDNEYS 2.86E-08
BL WALL 1.32E-08
ULI WALL 3.69E-07
SI WALL 8.01E-07
OVARIES 4.04E-08
TESTES 3.02E-09
SPLEEN 3.84E-08
UTERUS 3.52E-08
THYMUS 2.88E-09
THYROID 1.06E-09
GENETICALLY SIGNIFIC
(D)
TESTES - 9.05E-08
OVARIES 1.21E-06
AVERAGE 6.52E-07
TION INHALATION
HIGH LET
/ A \
(A)
1.52E-08
1.08E-07
1.20E-09
2.00E-08
8.68E-08
1.20E-09
2.36E-09
4.89E-08
6.00E-10
2.44E-08
6.12E-08
1.20E-09
1.20E-09
1.13E-09
1.20E-09
1.20E-09
1.20E-09
LNT DOSE
(D)
3.59E-08
3.59E-08
3.59E-08
LOW LET
x * \
(A)
9.59E-09
1.10E-08
6.07E-07
7.21E-09
2.19E-08
4.60E-08
1.40E-08
2.16E-09
5.05E-08
1.55E-09
. 9.86E-09
1.89E-08
3.04E-09
1.40E-09
1.16E-08
3.14E-09
1.86E-08
5.81E-09
CONVERSION
(D)
4.20E-08
9.11E-08
6-.65E-08
HIGH LET
(A)
5.70E-08
3.68E-07
.0
7.45E-09
7.32E-08
2.84E-09
7.45E-09
4.31E-11
4.53E-07
3.72E-09
4.70E-10
1.36E-09
7.45E-09
7.45E-09
7. 2 IE- 09
7.45E-09
7.45E-09
7.45E-09
AIR
IMMERSION
(B)
1.76E+09
1.86E+09
1.25E+09
1.30E+09
1.11E+09
1.11E+09
7.90E+08
8.72E+08
1.09E+09
9.80E+08
1.05E+09
9.69E+08
6.14E+08
1.61E+09
1.26E+09
8.45E+08
9.40E+08
1.23E+09
FACTORS FOR 30 YEAR
(D)
2.23E-07
2.23E-07
2.23E-07
(E)
4.83E+10
1.84E+10
3.34E+10
GROUND
VJxVvy U iiL/
SURFACE
(c)
3.81E+05
4.02E+05
2.68E+05
2.81E+05
2.39E+05
2.39E+05
1.69E+05
1.87E+05
2.35E+05
2.10E+05
2.25E+05
2.08E+05
1.32E+05
3.45E+05
2.70E+05
1.81E+05
2.02E+05
2.66E+05
EXPOSURE PERIOD
(F)
1.04E+07
3.96E+06
7.16E+06
CANCER
R MARROW
ENDOST
PULMNARY
BREAST
LIVER
ST WALL
PANCREAS
LLI WALL
KIDNEYS
BL WALL
ULI WALL
SI WALL
OVARIES
TESTES
SPLEEN
UTERUS
THYMUS
THYROID
GENETIC
s
AVERAGE
FATAL CANCER RISK
INGESTION
LOW LET
(G)
4.73E-09
2.22E-10
4.68E-09
4.58E-09
2.83E-09
1.22E-07
7.90E-09
3.87E-09
9.94E-10
4.59E-10
1.28E-08
1.39E-08
7.0 IE- 10
5.23E-11
6.67E-10
6.11E-10
5.00E-11
8.95E-11
EFFECT RlSK
(j)
\^ i
1.95E-13
HIGH LET
(G)
9.72E-08
3.20E-08
.0
4.78E-10
3.11E-08
7.53E-08
1.45E-09
1.64E-09
1.70E-08
2.08E-10
8.47E-09
1.06E-08
2.08E-10
2.08E-10
1.96E-10
2.08E-10
2. 08 E- 10
1.01E-10
CONVERSION
(j)
1.08E-12
CONVERSION FACTORS
INHALATION
LOW LET
(G)
3.11E-09
3.34E-10
3.69E-07
2.88E-09
3.41E-09
3.99E-09
1.70E-09
1.50E-10
1.75E-09
5.39E-11
3.42E-10
3.28E-10
5.27E-11
2.43E-11
2.02E-10
5.45E-11
3.23E-10
4.92E-10
FACTORS
(J)
2.00E-14
HIGH LET
(G)
3.69E-07
1.12E-07
2.82E-05
2.97E-09
1.14E-07
2.46E-09
9.04E-09
2.99E-11
1.57E-07
1.29E-09
1.63E-10
2.36E-10
1.29E-09
1.29E-09
1.25E-09
1.29E-09
1.29E-09
6.30E-10
(J)
6.70E-12
FOR LIFETIME EXPOSURE
AIR GROUND
IMMERSION
(H)
573.
57.3
760.
519.
173.
96.3
95.9
60.5
37.8
34.0
36.4
16.8
10.7
27.9
21.9
14.7
16.3
104.
t ~_ \
(K)
l.OOE+04
SURFACE
(I)
.124
1.24E-02
.163
.112
3.73E-02
2.07E-02
2.05E-02
1.30E-02
8.16E-03
7.29E-03
7.81E-03
3.61E-03
2.29E-03
5.99E-03
4.68E-03
3.14E-03
3.51E-03
2.25E-02
. \
(L)
2.14E+00
TABLE OF UNITS
70 YEAR COMMITTED DOSE (MILLIRAD)/(PERSON PICOCURIE)
MILLIRAD/YR)/ (PERSON MICROCURIE/CC)
MILLIRAD/YR)/(PERSON MICROCURIE/CM**2)
MILLIRAD)/(PERSON PICOCURIE/YR)
MILLIRAD)/(PERSON MICROCURIE/CC)
MILLIRAD ) / (PERSON MI CROCURIE/CM**2)
DEATHS)/(1E+5 PERSONS PICOCURIE/YR)
DEATHS)/(1E+5 PERSONS P^OCURIE/CC)
DFATH<3 V flE+5 PERSONS PICOCURIE/CM**2)
GENETIC EFFECTS/LIVE BIRTH)/(PERSON PICOCURIE/YR)
£ENETIC B*JbU;|/Jiv| ^^H<^pERSON MICROCURIE/CC)
GENETIC iFFECTl/LIvl BIRlS / PERSON MICROCURIE/CM**2)
-------
TABLE L.I
(CONTINUED)
L-10
FOR NUCLIDE : BI-214, RESP CLEARANCE CLASS=W, PARTICLE SIZE=1.0 AMAD, F1=0.500E-01
DOSE CONVERSION FACTORS
DRGAN INGESTION INHALATION AIR
LOW LET HIGH LET LOW LET HIGH LET IMMERSION
(A) (A) (A) (A) (B)
R MAR 6.93E-09 1.07E-09 4.37E-09 6.52E-09 8.72E+09
ENDOST 3.38E-09 1.17E-08 3.65E-09 2.67E-08 9.43E+09
*PUL* 6.37E-09 6.00E-11 3.18E-07 .0 8.28E+09
MUSCLE 7.02E-09 1.72E-10 4.41E-09 3.78E-09 8.74E+09
LIVER 9.67E-09 3.33E-10 7.59E-09 3.84E-09 7.54E+09
S WALL 1.06E-06 1.06E-07 1.89E-08 2.64E-09 7.92E+09
PANCREAS 5.60E-08 1.72E-10 8.35E-09 3.78E-09 7.94E+09
LLI WALL 1.76E-08 4.07E-10 9.08E-10 1.37E-09 6.81E+09
KIDNEYS 1.69E-08 1.84E-08 4.36E-08 4.19E-07 7.04E+09
BL WALL 5.89E-09 1.16E-10 8.13E-10 2.57E-09 7.40E+09
ULI WALL 9.75E-08 5.95E-09 2.96E-09 1.44E-09 8.83E+09
SI WALL 2.89E-07 2.81E-08 4.95E-09 1.71E-09 6.77E+09
OVARIES 1.68E-08 1.72E-10 1.35E-09 3.78E-09 6.93E+09
TESTES 1.44E-09 1.72E-10 6.48E-10 3.78E-09 6.74E+09
SPLEEN 3.22E-08 1.66E-10 7.27E-09 3.79E-09 8.18E+09
UTERUS 1.52E-08 1.72E-10 1.43E-09 3.78E-09 6.24E+09
THYMUS 2.37E-09 1.72E-10 1.22E-08 3.78E-09 7.48E+09
THYROID 7.26E-10 1.72E-10 3.70E-09 3.78E-09 7.87E+09
GENETICALLY SIGNIFICANT DOSE CONVERSION FACTORS FOR 30 YEAR
(D) (D) (D) (D) (E)
TESTES 4.31E-08 5.08E-09 1.94E-08 1.13E-07 2.02E4-11
OVARIES 5.03E-07 5.08E-09 4.06E-08 1.13E-07 2.08E+11
AVERAGE 2.73E-07 5.08E-09 3.00E-08 1.13E-07 2.05E+11
GROUND
SURFACE
(C)
1.52E+06
1.65E+06
1 .44E+06
1.52E+06
1.31E+06
1.38E+06
1.36E+06
1.17E+06
1.23E+06
1.29E+06
1.51E+06
1 . 1 7E+06
1.17E+06
1.20E+06
1.44E+06
1.08E+06
1.27E+06
1.35E+06
EXPOSURE PERIOD
(F)
3.60E+07
3.51E+07
3.56E+07
FATAL CANCER RISK CONVERSION FACTORS FOR LIFETIME EXPOSURE
CANCER INGESTION INHALATION AIR
LOW LET HIGH LET LOW LET HIGH LET IMMERSION
(G) (G) (G) (G) (H)
R MARROW 2.25E-09 5.53E-09 1.41E-09 4.09E-08 2.84E+03
ENDOST 1.02E-10 2.60E-09 1.10E-10 7.14E-09 290.
PULMNARY 3.87E-09 3.65E-10 1.93E-07 2.11E-05 5.04E+03
BREAST 2.80E-09 6.77E-11 1.76E-09 1.51E-09 3.49E+03
LIVER 1.51E-09 4.41E-10 1.18E-09 5.91E-09 1.18E+03
ST WALL 9.21E-08 9.19E-08 1.64E-09 2.29E-09 687.
PANCREAS 6.80E-09 2.06E-10 1.01E-09 4.58E-09 964.
LLI WALL 1.22E-09 2.82E-10 6.30E-11 9.54E-10 473.
KIDNEYS 5.85E-10 6.39E-09 1.51E-09 1.45E-07 244.
BL WALL 2.04E-10 3.99E-11 2.82E-11 8.93E-10 257.
ULI WALL 3.38E-09 2.07E-09. 1.03E-10 5.00E-10 306.
SI WALL 5.01E-09 4.88E-09 8*59E-ll 2.96E-10 117.
OVARIES 2.91E-10 2.94E-11 2.35E-11 6.55E-10 120.
TESTES 2.49E-11 2.94E-11 1.12E-11 6.55E-10 117.
SPLEEN 5.59E-10 2.85E-11 1.26E-10 6.57E-10 142.
UTERUS 2.64E-10 2.94E-11 2.47E-11 6.55E-10 108.
THYMUS 4.11E-11 2.94E-11 2.12E-10 6.55E-10 130.
THYROID 6.14E-11 1.44E-11 3.13E-10 3.20E-10 666.
GENETIC EFFECT RISK CONVERSION FACTORS
(J) (J) (J) (J) (K)
AVERAGE 8.19E-14 1.53E-13 9.00E-15 3.39E-12 6.15E+04
fABLE OF UNITS
(A) - 70 YEAR COMMITTED DOSE (MILLIRAD) / (PERSON PICOCURIE)
(B - (MILLIRAD /YR) / (PERSON MICROCURIE/CC)
(C - (MILLIRAD /YR)/ (PERSON MICROCURIE/CM**2)
(D - (MILLIRAD) /(PERSON PICOCURIE/YR)
E - MILLIRAD) /(PERSON MICROCURIE/CC)
F - MILLIRAD) /(PERSON MICROCURIE/CM**2)
G - DEATHS) /(1E+5 PERSONS PICOCURIE/YR)
H - DEATHS) /(1E+5 PERSONS PICOCURIE/CC)
I) - DEATHS) /(1E+ 5 PERSONS PICOCURIE/CM**2)
J) - GENETIC EFFECTS/LIVE BIRTH) / (PERSON PICOCURIE/YR)
K) - GENETIC EFFECTS /LIVE BIRTH) / (PERSON MICROCURIE/CC)
(L) - (GENETIC^ EFFECTS /LIVE BIRTH) / (PERSON MICRO CURIE /CM** 2)
GROUND
SURFACE
(D
.495
5.08E-02
.876
.607
.205
.120
.165
8.12E-02
4.27E-02
4.48E-02
5.24E-02
2.03E-02
2.03E-02
2.08E-02
2-50E-02
1.87E-02
2.20E-02
.114
(L)
1.07E+01
-------
TABLE L.I
(CONTINUED)
OR NUCLIDE : PB-210, RESP CLEARANCE CLASS=W, PARTICLE SIZE=
L-ll
1.0 AMAD, Fl=0.200
OSE CONVERSION FACTORS
RGAN
INGESTION INHALATION
LOW LET HIGH LET LOW LET HIGH LET
(A) (A) (A) (A}
MAR 5.28E-05 1.19E-05 5.92E-05 1.61E-05
NDOST 1.42E-04 2.83E-04 1.59E-04 3.18E-04
PUL* 9.05E-08 .0 3.01E-04 5.25E-04
JJSCLE 1.54E-06 4.01E-06 1.78E-06 7.29E-06
IVER 3.90E-05 1.06E-04 4.37E-05 1.27E-04
WALL 2.04E-07 2.71E-13 1.07E-06 5.42E-09
'ANCREAS 1.58E-06 4.01E-06 1.82E-06 7.29E-06
,LI WALL 1.75E-05 1.06E-08 4.04E-05 2.60E-07
SIDNEYS 1.82E-05 4.93E-05 2.35E-05 1.14E-04
IL WALL 7.61E-07 2.00E-06 8.68E-07 3.65E-06
[LI WALL 3.73E-06 7.55E-10 1.38E-05 7.79E-08
!I WALL 4.73E-07 1.02E-11 2.43E-06 1.24E-08
(VARIES 1.56E-06 4.01E-06 1.77E-06 7.29E-06
CESTES
>PLEEN
JTERUS
CHYMUS
1.50E-06 4.01E-06 1.72E-06 7.29E-06
1.47E-06 3.81E-06 1.69E-06 8.72E-05
1.52E-06 4.01E-06 1.74E-06 7.29E-06
1.52E-06 4.01E-06 1.77E-06 7.29E-06
CHYROID 1.53E-06 4.01E-06 1.75E-06 7.29E-06
AIR
IMMERSION
(B)
1.19E+07
1.32E+07
4.94E+06
6.29E+06
3.93E+06
4.19E+06
2.60E+06
2.38E+06
4.36E+06
3.09E+06
3.11E+06
2.71E+06
3.97E+06
6.72E+06
3.74E+06
1.12E+06
4.41E+06
7.34E+06
GENETICALLY SIGNIFICANT DOSE CONVERSION FACTORS FOR 30 YEAR
FESTES
(D) (D) (D) (D)
2.93E-05 7.79E-05 3.37E-05 1.69E-04
DVARIES 3.05E-05 7.79E-05 3.48E-05 1.69E-04
AVERAGE 2.99E-05 7.79E-05 3.43E-05 1.69E-04
:ANCER
FATAL CANCER RISK CONVERSION FACTORS
INGESTION INHALATION
LOW LET HIGH LET LOW LET HIGH LET
(G) (G) (G) (G)
I MARROW 1.26E-05 5.81E-05 1.41E-05 8.32E-05
ENDOST
3.11E-06 6.15E-05 3.47E-06 6.91E-05
PULMNARY 3.59E-08 .0 1.83E-04 3.19E-03
BREAST
LIVER
4.36E-07 1.13E-06 5.06E-07 2.36E-06
4.33E-06 1.17E-04 4.84E-06 1.44E-04
ST WALL 1.64E-08 2.35E-13 9.02E-08 4.63E-09
PANCREAS 1.36E-07 3.45E-06 1.57E-07 7.17E-06
LLI WALL 1.22E-06 7.34E-09 2.77E-06 1.78E-07
KIDNEYS 4.51E-07 1.21E-05 6.08E-07 3.36E-05
BL WALL 1.88E-08 4.93E-07 2.15E-08 1.02E-06
ULI WALL 1.29E-07 2.62E-10 4.73E-07 2.66E-08
SI WALL 7.83E-09 1.76E-12 4.14E-08 2.12E-09
DVARIES 1.93E-08 4.93E-07 2.19E-08 1.02E-06
IESTES
SPLEEN
[JTERUS
IHYMUS
1.85E-08 4.93E-07 2.13E-08 1.02E-06
1.81E-08 4.70E-07 2.10E-08 1.46E-05
1.88E-08 4.93E-07 2.15E-08 1.02E-06
1.88E-08 4.93E-07 2.20E-08 1.02E-06
IHYROID 9.99E-08 2.63E-07 1.15E-07 5.27E-07
(E)
2.02E+08
1.19E+08
1.60E+08
GROUND
vj£\x/ u lily
SURFACE
/p\
(*")
3.97E+03
4.42E+03
1.66E+03
2.28E+03
1.28E+03
1.46E+03
884.
U\J ~T
807.
vJ vy /
1.42E+03
1.01E+03
1.01E+03
883.
1.32E+03
2.62E+03
1.23E+03
366.
1.44E+03
2.42E+03
EXPOSURE PERIOD
(F)
7.86E+04
3.96E+04
5.91E+04
FOR LIFETIME EXPOSURE
AIR
IMMERSION
(H)
3.87
.406
3.01
2.51
.614
.364
.316
.165
.151
.107
.108
4.70E-02
6.89E-02
.117
6.49E-02
1.94E-02
7.65E-02
.621
GENETIC EFFECT RISK CONVERSION FACTORS
/ (J) (J) (J) (J)
AVERAGE 8.97E-12 2.34E-09 1.03E-11 5.08E-09
(K)
4.81E+01
GROUND
SURFACE
(D
1.29E-03
1.36E-04
1.01E-03
9.10E-04
2.00E-04
1.27E-04
1.07E-04
5.60E-05
4.93E-05
3.50E-05
3.50E-05
1.53E-05
2.29E-05
4.55E-05
2.13E-05
6.35E-06
2.50E-05
2.05E-04
/T \
(L)
1.77E-02
FABLE OF UNITS
(A) - 70 YEAR COMMITTED DOSE (MILLIRAD)/ (PERSON PICOCURIE)
(B - <
(C - |
(D - (
E -
F) -
G) -
H) -
D - (
J) - <
K) - 1
L) - (
:MILLIRAD/YR) / (PERSON MICROCURIE/CC)
;MILLIRAD/YR) / (PERSON MicROCURiE/CM**2)
[MILLIRAD) /(PERSON PICOCURIE/YR)
MILLIRAD) /(PERSON MICROCURIE/CC)
MILLIRAD) /(PERSON MICROCURIE/CM**2)
DEATHS) /(1E+5 PERSONS PICOCURIE/YR)
DEATHS) /(1E+5 PERSONS PICOCURIE/CC)
DEATHS) / (1E+5 PERSONS PICOCURIE/CM**2)
GENETIC EFFECTS/LIVE BIRTH) /(PERSON PICOCU1
> T T? / VTO \
IIE/YR)
T *\T Tt If* r* \
!GENETIC EFFECTS/LIVE BIRTH) /(PERSON MicRocuRiE/CM**2)
-------
TABLE L.I
(CONTINUED)
L-12
FOR NUCLIDE : PO-210, RESP CLEARANCE CLASS=W, PARTICLE SIZE=1.0 AMAD, F1=0.100E+00
DOSE CONVERSION FACTORS
ORGAN
R MAR
ENDOST
*PUL*
MUSCLE
LIVER
S WALL
PANCREAS
LLI WALL
KIDNEYS
BL WALL
ULI WALL
SI WALL
OVARIES
TESTES
SPLEEN
UTERUS
THYMUS
THYROID
INGESTION
LOW LET
(A)
1.91E-11
1.21E-11
1.15E-11
1.43E-11
3.14E-11
2.64E-11
3.76E-11
7.89E-11
7.50E-11
1.92E-11
5.31E-11
4.11E-11
4.27E-11
1.08E-11
1.15E-10
3.51E-11
1.54E-11
8.16E-12
HIGH LET
(A)
2.66E-05
1.22E-05
.0
2.63E-05
8.15E-05
2.26E-07
2.63E-05
9.01E-06
4.72E-04
1.31E-05
3.00E-06
5.08E-07
2.63E-05
2.63E-05
8.15E-04
2.63E-05
2.63E-05
2.63E-05
INHALATION
LOW LET
(A)
3.90E-11
2.91E-11
3.26E-10
3.51E-11
7.57E-11
5.59E-11
8.49E-11
5.02E-11
1.24E-10
2.15E-11
4.47E-11
3.67E-11
3.64E-11
1.42E-11
2.02E-10
4.26E-11
7.40E-11
2.95E-11
HIGH LET
(A)
4.10E-05
1.89E-05
3.92E-03
4.05E-05
1.26E-04
1.11E-07
4.05E-05
4.42E-06
7.28E-04
2.03E-05
1.47E-06
2.49E-07
4.05E-05
4.05E-05
1.26E-03
4.05E-05
4.05E-05
4.05E-05
AIR
GROUND
IMMERSION SURFACE
(B)
4.87E+04
5.26E+04
4.33E+04
4.62E+04
3.93E+04
4.11E+04
3.85E+04
3.08E+04
4.25E+04
4.00E+04
4.02E+04
3.50E+04
2.38E+04
4.49E+04
4.69E+04
3.18E+04
3.03E+04
3.52E+04
(C)
9.45
10.2
8.40
8.95
7.62
7.97
7.46
5.97
8.24
7.75
7.80
6.79
4.62
8.70
9.09
6.17
5.87
6.82
GENETICALLY SIGNIFICANT DOSE CONVERSION FACTORS FOR 30 YEAR EXPOSURE PERIOD
(D) (D) (D) (D) (E) (F)
TESTES 3.23E-10 7.84E-04 4.24E-10 1.21E-03 1.35E+06 261.
OVARIES 1.28E-09 7.84E-04 1.09E-09 1.21E-03 7-14E+05 139.
AVERAGE 8.01E-10 7.84E-04 7.55E-10 1.21E-03 1.03E+06 200.
FATAL CANCER RISK
CANCER
R MARROW
ENDOST
PULMNARY
BREAST
LIVER
ST WALL
PANCREAS
LLI WALL
KIDNEYS
BL WALL
ULI WALL
SI WALL
OVARIES
TESTES
SPLEEN
UTERUS
THYMUS
THYROID
INGESTION
LOW LET
(G)
6.23E-12
3.73E-13
6.97E-12
5.70E-12
4.90E-12
2.29E-12
4.57E-12
5.47E-12
2.60E-12
6.67E-13
1.84E-12
7-14E-13
7.41E-13
1.88E-13
2.00E-12
6.09E-13
2.67E-13
6.91E-13
GENETIC EFFECT RISK
AVERAGE
(J)
2.40E-16
HIGH LET
(G)
1.73E-04
3.77E-06
.0
1.05E-05
1.27E-04
1.96E-07
3.19E-05
6.25E-06
1.64E-04
4.56E-06
1.04E-06
. 8.82E-08
4.56E-06
4.56E-06
1.41E-04
4.56E-06
4.56E-06
2.22E-06
CONVERSION
(J)
2.35E-08
CONVERSION FACTORS
INHALATION
LOW LET
(G)
1.27E-11
8.95E-13
1.98E-10
1.40E-11
1.18E-11
4.84E-12
1.03E-11
3.48E-12
4.30E-12
7.43E-13
1.55E-12
6.36E-13
6.30E-13
2.46E-13
3.50E-12
7.38E-13
1.28E-12
2.50E-12
FACTORS
(J)
2.26E-16
HIGH LET
(G)
2.67E-04
5.80E-06
2.38E-02
1.6 IE- 05
1.96E-04
9.60E-08
4.91E-05
3.06E-06
2.52E-04
7.01E-06
5.09E-07
4.31E-08
7.01E-06
7.01E-06
2.17E-04
7.01E-06
7.01E-06
3.42E-06
(J)
3.63E-08
FOR LIFETIME EXPOSURE
AIR
IMMERSION
(H)
1.59E-02
1.62E-03
2.63E-02
1.84E-02 .
6.14E-03
3.57E-03
4.68E-03
2.14E-03
1.47E-03
1.39E-03
1.40E-03
6.07E-04
4.13E-04
7.79E-04
8.14E-04
5.52E-04
5.26E-04
2.98E-03
(K)
3.09E-01
GROUND
SURFACE
(D
3.08E-06
3.14E-07
5.11E-06
3.57E-06
1.19E-06
6.91E-07
9.06E-07
4.14E-07
2.86E-07
2.69E-07
2.71E-07
1.18E-07
8.02E-08
l.SlE^-07
1.58E-07
1.07E-07
1.02E-07
5.77E-07
(L)
6.00E-05
TABLE OF UNITS
70 YEAR COMMITTED DOSE (MILLIRAD)/(PERSON PICOCURIE)
MILLIRAD/YR)/(PERSON MICROCURIE/CC)
MILLIRAD/YR)/(PERSON MICROCURIE/CM**2)
MILLIRAD)/(PERSON PICOCURIE/YR)
MILLIRAD)/ (PERSON MICRO CU RIE/C C)
MILLIRAD)/(PERSON MI CRO CURIE/CM** 2)
DEATHS)/(1E+5 PERSONS PICOCURIE/YR)
DEATHS)/(1E+5 PERSONS PICOCURIE/CC)
DEATHS)/(1E+5 PERSONS PICOCURIE/CM**2)
GENETIC EFFECTS/LIVE BIRTH)/(PERSON PICOCURIE/YR)
(GENETIC EFFECTS/LIVE BIRTH)/(PERSON MICROCURIE/CC)
(GENETIC EFFECTS/LIVE BIRTH)/(PERSON MICROCURIE/CM**2)
-------
TABLE L.I
(CONTINUED)
FOR NU GLIDE : TH-232, RESP CLEARANCE CLASS=Y, PARTICLE SIZE=
DOSE CONVERSION FACTORS
ORGAN
R MAR
ENDOST
*PUL*
MUSCLE
LIVER
S WALL
PANCREAS
LLI WALL
KIDNEYS
BL WALL
ULI WALL
SI WALL
OVARIES
TESTES
SPLEEN
UTERUS
THYMUS
THYROID
INGESTION INHALATION
LOW LET HIGH LET LOW LET HIGH LET
9.24E-08 5.22E-05 5.54E-05 1.^-02
2.50E-07 9.30E-04 9.91E-05 .243
6.82E-09 4.29E-11 5.84E-03 4.22E-02
8.80E-09 1.99E-07 2.81E-05 9.18E-05
9.44E-09 9.49E-07 4.81E-05 3.56E-04
5.18E-08 1.70E-07 4.01E-05 2.67E-Q7
8.21E-09 1.99E-07 4.68E-05 9.18E-05
2.15E-06 7.57E-06 3.40E-05 9.48E-06
8.46E-09 1.88E-07 2.19E-05 8.82E-05
5.00E-09 9.95E-08 4.24E-06 4.59E-05
7.14E-07 2.52E-06 2.90E-05 3.35E-06
1.31E-07 4.27E-07 1.52E-05 5.84E-07
1.33E-08 1.99E-07 8.14E-06 9.18E-05
6.08E-09 1.99E-07 3.85E-06 9.18E-05
6.72E-09 1.88E-07 4.22E-05 8.70E-05
7.41E-09 1.99E-07 7.07E-06 9.18E-05
6.31E-09 1.99E-07 7.63E-05 9.18E-05
5.79E-09 1.99E-07 2.43E-05 9.18E-05
AIR
IMMERSION
(B)
1.40E+06
1.54E+06
6.72E+05
7.91E+05
5.55E+05
5.39E+05
4.09E+05
3.97E+05
5.56E+05
4.69E+05
4.63E+05
4.50E+05
4.31E+05
8.78E+05
5.10E+05
2.51E+05
4.97E+05
9.11E+05
L-iJ
1.0 AMAD, F1=0.200E-03
GROUND
SURFACE
455.
511.
209.
389.
145.
178.
X / U
131.
Jo ^/ .!»
138.
^ ^ v/
145.
JL ^r *y
m.
»
120.
116.
131.
477.
144.
62.5
130.
253.
GENETICALLY SIGNIFICANT DOSE CONVERSION FACTORS FOR 30 YEAR EXPOSURE PERIOD
TESTES
OVARIES
AVERAGE
CANCER
R MARROW
ENDOST
PULMNARY
BREAST
LIVER
ST WALL
PANCREAS
LLI WALL
KIDNEYS
BL WALL
ULI WALL
SI WALL
OVARIES
TESTES
SPLEEN
UTERUS
THYMUS
THYROID
(D) (D) (D) (D)
7.86E-08 5.41E-06 4.35E-05 1.58E-03
2.64E-07 5.41E-06 1.13E-04 1.58E-03
1.72E-07 5.41E-06 7.83E-05 1.58E-03
FATAL CANCER RISK CONVERSION FACTORS
INGESTION INHALATION
LOW LET HIGH LET LOW LET HIGH LET
(G) (G) (G) (G)
1.77E-08 2.14E-04 1.05E-05 5.26E-02
4.33E-09 1.73E-04 1.63E-06 4.06E-02
1.88E-09 2.61E-10 1.85E-03 .242
1.74E-09 7.29E-08 5.52E-06 2.31E-05
9.62E-10 1.36E-06 3.76E-06 3.75E-04
4.31E-09 1.48E-07 1.85E-06 2.09E-07
5.04E-10 2.22E-07 2.82E-06 7.04E-05
1.49E-07 5.25E-06 1.91E-06 6.00E-06
1.46E-10 5.98E-08 3.77E-07 1.93E-05
9.78E-11 3.17E-08 7.39E-08 1.01E-05
2.47E-08 8.74E-07 7.44E-07 1.06E-06
2.21E-09 7.40E-08 1.74E-07 9.19E-08
1.65E-10 3.17E-08 7.56E-08 1.01E-05
5.49E-11 3.17E-08 3.11E-08 1.01E-05
5.97E-11 3.00E-08 3.64E-07 9.52E-06
7.45E-11 3.17E-08 6.27E-08 1.01E-05
5.63E-11 3.17E-08 6.59E-07 1-01E-05
2.95E-10 1.59E-08 1.21E-06 5.54E-06
GENETIC EFFECT RISK CONVERSION FACTORS
^
AVERAGE
(J) (J) (J) (J)
5.16E-14 1.62E-10 2.36E-11 4.74E-08
(E)
2.63E4-07
1.29E+07
1.96E+07
(F)
1.43E-H04
3.93E+03
9.12E+03
FOR LIFETIME EXPOSURE
AIR
IMMERSION
(H)
.456
4.74E-02
.409
.316
8.67E-02
4.68E-02
4.97E-02
2.76E-02
1.93E-02
1.63E-02
1.61E-02
7.81E-03
7.48E-03
1.52E-02
8.85E-03
4.36E-03
8.62E-03
7.71E-02
Srf \
(K)
5.89E+00
GROUND
SURFACE
(I)
1.48E-04
1.57E-05
1.27E-04
1.55E-04
2.26E-05
1.54E-05
1.59E-05
9.58E-06
5.03E-06
4.20E-06
4.16E-06
2.01E-06
2.27E-06
8.28E-06
2.50E-06
1.08E-06
2.26E-06
2.14E-05
/T \
(L)
2.73E-03
TABLE OF UNITS
A)
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
70 YEAR COMMITTED DOSE (MILLIRAD)/(PERSON PICOCURIE)
(MILLIRAD/YR) / (PERSON MICROCURIE/CC)
MILLIRAD/YR)/(PERSON MICROCURIE/CM**2)
MILHRAD)/(PERSON PICOCURIE/YR)
MILLIRAD)/(PERSON MICROCURIE/CC)
MILLIRAD ) / (PERSON MICROOIRIE/CM**2)
DEATHS)/(1E+5 PERSONS PICOCURIE/YR)
DEATHS)/(1E+5 PERSONS PICOCUHE/CC)
DEATHS)/(1E+5 PERSONS PICOCURIE/CM**2)
rmstrnr ptnnrrT*!/T TVF RTRTH) /(PERSON PICOCURIci/iKJ
GENETIC EFFECTS/LIVE |f§gJ^>|||SON MICROCURIE/CC)
cSrac §s?£ivi BIRTH j'/1 PERSON MicRocuRiE/CM**2)
-------
L-14
TABLE L.I
(CONTINUED)
FOR NUCLIDE : RA-228, RESP CLEARANCE CLASS=W, PARTICLE SIZE=
DOSE CONVERSION FACTORS
ORGAN INGESTION INHALATION AIR
LOW LET HIGH LET LOW LET HIGH LET IMMERSION
(A) (A) . (A) (A) (B)
R MAR 1.76E-05 3.01E-05 2.26E-05 4.08E-05 2.49E-02
ENDOST 3.38E-05 3.02E-04 4.12E-05 4.16E-04 3.08E-02
*PUL* 2.03E-06 .0 4.75E-04 3.82E-04 1.68E-02
MUSCLE 4.68E-06 2.04E-05 7.64E-06 2.75E-05 6.97E-02
LIVER 4.41E-06 1.94E-05 9.64E-06 3.74E-05 1.80E-04
S WALL 2.15E-06 9.94E-13 8.82E-06 2.51E-08 4.23E-02
PANCREAS 5.03E-06 2.04E-05 l.OOE-05 2.75E-05 1.21E-02
LLI WALL 7.07E-05 2.08E-08 5.07E-05 9.31E-07 6.97E-03
KIDNEYS 4.87E-06 1.94E-05 7.41E-06 2.62E-05 2.45E-05
BL WALL 3.56E-06 1.02E-05 4.00E-06 1.37E-05 2.94E-09
ULI WALL 2.16E-05 1.81E-09 2.68E-05 3.18E-07 6.00E-05
SI WALL 5.49E-06 3.58E-11 1.07E-05 5.31E-08 3.28E-05
OVARIES 6.98E-06 2.04E-05 7.64E-06 2.75E-05 8.99E-03
TESTES 4.15E-06 2.04E-05 4.74E-06 2.75E-05 .150
SPLEEN 4.43E-06 1.94E-05 8.85E-06 2.60E-05 4.23E-03
UTERUS 6.40E-06 2.04E-05 7.43E-06 2.75E-05 1.68E-06
THYMUS 4.80E-06 2.04E-05 1.27E-05 2.75E-05 2.49E-06
THYROID 3.89E-06 2.04E-05 6.63E-06 2.75E-05 8.47E-03
1.0 AMAD, F1=0.200E+00
GROUND
SURFACE
(C)
5.10E-05
6.31E-05
3.45E-05
1.43E-04
3.68E-07
8.68E-05
2.47E-05
1.43E-05
5.01E-08
6.03E-12
1.23E-07
6.73E-08
1.84E-05
3.07E-04
8.68E-06
3.43E-09
5.10E-09
1.74E-05
GENETICALLY SIGNIFICANT DOSE CONVERSION FACTORS FOR 30 YEAR EXPOSURE PERIOD
(D) (D) (D) (D) (E)
TESTES 1.14E-04 5.53E-04 1.30E-04 7.46E-04 4.50
OVARIES 1.97E-04 5.53E-04 2.15E-04 7.46E-04 .270
AVERAGE 1.56E-04 5.53E-04 1.72E-04 7.46E-04 2.38
(F)
9.21E-03
5.52E-04
4.88E-03
FATAL CANCER RISK CONVERSION FACTORS FOR LIFETIME EXPOSURE
CANCER INGESTION INHALATION AIR
LOW LET HIGH LET LOW LET HIGH LET IMMERSION
(G) (G) (G) (G) (H)
R MARROW 5.27E-06 1.82E-04 6.82E-06 2.48E-04 8.11E-09
ENDOST 9.41E-07 8.02E-05 1.15E-06 1.12E-04 9.48E-10
PULMNARY 1.10E-06 .0 2.89E-04 2.32E-03 1.02E-08
BREAST 1.72E-06 7.45E-06 2.88E-06 l.OOE-05 2.78E-08
LIVER 6.41E-07 2.76E-05 1.45E-06 5.40E-05 2.81E-11
ST WALL 1.74E-07 8.63E-13 7.47E-07 2.13E-08 3.67E-09
PANCREAS 5.66E-07 2.27E-05 1.17E-06 3.05E-05 1.47E-09
LLI WALL 4.89E-06 1.44E-08 3.48E-06 6.32E-07 4.84E-10
KIDNEYS 1.57E-07 6.14E-06 2.42E-07 8.32E-06 8.50E-13
BL WALL 1.16E-07 3.24E-06 1.30E-07 4.37E-06 1.02E-16
ULI WALL 7.42E-07 6.29E-10 9.16E-07 1.08E-07 2.08E-12
SI WALL 9.19E-08 6.21E-12 1.81E-07 9.00E-09 5.69E-13
OVARIES 1.15E-07 3.24E-06 1.25E-07 4.36E-06 1.56E-10
TESTES 6.70E-08 3.24E-06 7.62E-08 4.36E-06 2.60E-09
SPLEEN 7.14E-08 3.07E-06 1.47E-07 4.14E-06 7.34E-1T
UTERUS 1.05E-07 3.24E-06 1.21E-07 4.36E-06 2.92E-14
THYMUS 7.75E-08 3.24E-06 2.13E-07 4.36E-06 4.32E-14
THYROID 3.14E-07 1.63E-06 5.43E-07 2.20E-06 7.17E-10
GENETIC EFFECT RISK CONVERSION FACTORS
(J) (J) (J) (J) (K)
AVERAGE 4.68E-11 1.67E-08 5.16E-11 2.24E-08 7.16E-07
IABLE OF UNITS
(A) - 70 YEAR COMMITTED DOSE (MILLIRAD) /(PERSON PICOCURIE)
(B) - (MI LLIRAD/YR)/ (PERSON MICROCURIE/CC)
(C) - (MILLIRAD /YR)/ (PERSON MICROCURIE/CM**2)
(D) - (MILLIRAD) /(PERSON PICOCURIE/YR)
E - (MILLIRAD) /(PERSON MICROCURIE/CC)
F - MILLIRAD) /(PERSON MICRO CURIE/CM** 2)
G - DEATHS) /(1E+ 5 PERSONS PICOCURIE/YR)
H - DEATHS) /(lE+5 PERSONS PICOCURIE/CC)
I - DEATHS) /(1E+5 PERSONS PICOCURIE/CM**2)
J - GENETIC EFFECTS/LIVE BIRTH)/ (PERSON PICOCURIE/YR)
(K - GENETIC EFFECTS/LIVE BIRTH) /(PERSON MICROCURIE/CC)
(L) - (GENETIC EFFECTS/LIVE BIRTH) / (PERSON MICRO CURIE /CM** 2)
GROUND
SURFACE
(D
1.66E-11
1.94E-12
2.10E-11
5.71E-11
5.75E-14
7.53E-12
3.00E-12
9.92E-13
1.74E-15
2.09E-19
4.27E-15
1.17E-15
3.19E-13
5.33E-12
1.51E-13
5.95E-17
8.85E-17
1.47E-12
(L)
1.46E-09
-------
TABLE L.I
(CONTINUED)
FOR NUCLIDE : AC-228, RESP CLEARANCE CLASS=W, PARTICLE SIZE=
DOSE CONVERSION FACTORS
ORGAN
R MAR
ENDOST
*PUL*
MUSCLE
LIVER
S WALL
PANCREAS
LLI WALL
KIDNEYS
BL WALL
ULI WALL
SI WALL
OVARIES
TESTES
SPLEEN
UTERUS
THYMUS
THYROID
INGESTION
LOW LET
/ A \
(A)
1.22E-07
4.26E-08
2.59E-08
8.14E-08
9.92E-08
2.08E-06
1.78E-07
6.16E-06
1.37E-07
1.44E-07
8.05E-06
3.74E-06
5.15E-07
3.75E-08
1.19E 07
2.98E-07
1.08E-08
3.32E-09
HIGH LET
/ A \
(A)
9.47E-09
1.10E-07
1.95E-14
1.70E-10
1.35E-08
8.80E-12
1.70E-10
7.00E-09
1.65E-10
8.52E-11
1.33E-09
8.78E-11
1.70E-10
1.70E-10
1.61E-10
1.70E-10
1.70E-10
1.70E-10
INHALATION
LOW LET
f A X
(A)
8.38E-08
1.01E-07
3.62E-06
5.19E-08
2.79E-07
3.50E-07
9.70E-08
9.12E-07
5.71E-08
2.68E-08
1.17E-06
5.49E-07
8.49E-08
1.13E-08
7.62E-08
5.28E-08
1.09E-07
3.61E-08
. GENETICALLY SIGNIFICANT DOSE CONVERSION
TESTES
OVARIES
AVERAGE
(D)
1.12E-06
1.54E-05
8.28E-06
(D)
4.89E-09
4.89E-09
4.89E-09
FATAL CANCER RISK
CANCER
R MARROW
ENDOST
PULMNARY
BREAST
LIVER
ST WALL
PANCREAS
LLI WALL
KIDNEYS
BL WALL
ULI WALL
SI WALL
OVARIES
TESTES
SPLEEN
UTERUS
THYMUS-
THYROID
INGESTION
LOW LET
(G)
3.97E-08
1.31E-09
1.57E-08
3.25E-08
1.55E-08
1.80E-07
2.17E-08
4.28E-07
4.77E-09
5.00E-09
2.79E-07
6.49E-08
8.93E-09
6.50E-10
2.07E-09
5.16E-09
1.88E-10
2.81E-10
GENETIC EFFECT RISK
.
AVERAGE
(j)
2.49E-12
HIGH LET
(G)
5.92E-08
3.23E-08
1.19E-13
6.55E-11
2.03E-08
7.63E-12
1.99E-10
4.86E-09
5.52E-11
2.85E-11
4.62E-10
1.52E-11
2.85E-11
2.85E-11
2.70E-11
2.85E-11
2.85E-11
1.41E-11
CONVERSION
(J)
\ *J f
1.47E-13
(D)
3.35E-07
2.54E-06
1.44E-06
HIGH LET
(A)
2.26E-06
2.60E-05
3.28E-06
5.72E-08
1.61E-06
2.37E-10
5.72E-08
1.02E-08
5. 5 IE- 08
2.86E-08
3.24E-09
5.15E-10
5.72E-08
5.72E-08
5.42E-08
5.72E-08
5.72E-08
5.72E-08
AIR
IMMERSION
(B)
5.41E+09
5.85E+09
4.82E+09
5 . 1 1E+09
4.34E+09
4.48E+09
4.49E+09
3.54E+09
4.49E+09
4.42E+09
4.64E+09
3.90E+09
3.20E+09
4.73E+09
5.12E+09
3.51E+09
3.71E+09
4.19E+09
FACTORS FOR 30 YEAR
(D)
1.63E-06
1.63E-06
1.63E-06
CONVERSION FACTORS
INHALATION
LOW LET
(G)
2.71E-08
3.08E-09
2.20E-06
2.07E-08
4.35E-08
3.04E-08
1.18E-08
6.33E-08
1.98E-09
9.27E-10
4.07E-08
9.52E-09
1.47E-09
1.94E-10
1.32E-09
9.14E-10
1.89E-09
3.05E-09
FACTORS
(J)
4.32E-13
HIGH LET
(G)
1.41E-05
7.62E-06
1.99E-05
2.18E-08
2.42E-06
2.04E-10
6.64E-08
7.05E-09
1.83E-08
9.50E-09
1.12E-09
8.85E-11
9.49E-09'
9.49E-09
9.00E-09
9.49E-09
9.49E-09
4.71E-09
(J)
4.89E-11
(E)
1.42E+11
9.60E+10
1.19E+11
li-lD
1.0 AMAD, F1=0.100E-02
GROT1NH
UI\\J U IXU
SURFACE
(C)
1.02E+06
1.11E+06
9.04E+05
9.59E+05
8.14E+05
8.39E+05
8.37E+05
6.61E+05
8.45E+05
8.28E+05
8.65E+05
7.32E+05
5.90E+05
9.00E+05
9.59E+05
6.58E+05
6.90E+05
7.86E+05
EXPOSURE PERIOD
(F) .
2.70E+07
1.77E+07
2.24E+07
FOR LIFETIME EXPOSURE
AIR
IMMERSION
(H)
1.76E+03
180.
2.93E+03
2.04E+03
678.
389.
545.
246.
156.
153.
161.
67.7
55.5
82.1
88.8
60.9
64.4
355.
t vr V
(K)
3.57E+04
GROUND
SURFACE
(I)
.332
3.42E-02
.550
.383
.127
7.28E-02
.102
4.59E-02
2.93E-02
2.87E-02
3.00E-02
1.27E-02
1.02E-02
1.56E-02
1.66E-02
1.14E-02
1.20E-02
6.65E-02
/T \
(L)
6.70E+00
TABLE OF UNITS
70 YEAR COMMITTED DOSE (MILLIRAD)/ (PERSON PICOCURIE)
'MILLIRAD/YR)/ (PERSON MICROCURIE/CC)
toLIRAD/YR) / (PERSON MICRO CURIE /CM** 2)
[MILLIRAD) /(PERSON PICOCURIE/YR)
'MILLIRAD) / (PERSON MICROCURIE/CC)
MILLIRAD / (PERSON MI CROOJRIE/CM**2
DEATHb)/ UMO {«£!""? BIRTH) / (PERSON PICOCURIE/YR)
GENETIC EFFECTS/LIVE jliun u ^ MICROCURIE/CC)
iFlcTS/LIVE BIRTHJHPERSON MICROCURIE/CM**2)
-------
L-16
TABLE L.I
(CONTINUED)
FOR NUCLIDE : TH-228, RESP CLEARANCE CLASS=Y, PARTICLE SIZE=1.0 AMAD, F1=0.200E-03
DOSE CONVERSION FACTORS
ORGAN
R MAR
ENDOST
*PUL*
MUSCLE
LIVER
S WALL
PANCREAS
LLI WALL
KIDNEYS
BL WALL
ULI WALL
SI WALL
OVARIES
TESTES
SPLEEN
UTERUS
THYMUS
THYROID
INGESTION
LOW LET
(A)
2.27E-07
2.05E-07
1.75E-08
9.50E-08
6.37E-08
1.93E-07
6.26E-08
3.44E-05
7.92E-08
2.62E-07
4.62E-06
7.45E-07
7.91E-07
9.75E-08
6.31E-08
2.88E-07
1.71E-08
1.11E-08
HIGH LET
(A)
1.17E-05
1.33E-04
7.32E-11
3.33E-07
1.20E-06
2.36E-07
3.33E-07
2.20E-05
3.43E-07
1.67E-07
5.08E-06
6.39E-07
3.33E-07
3.33E-07
3.18E-07
3.33E-07
3.33E-07
3.33E-07
GENETICALLY SIGNIFICANT DOSE
TESTES
OVARIES
AVERAGE
(D)
2.91E-06
2.37E-05
1.33E-05
(D)
9.68E-06
9.68E-06
9.68E-06
INHALATION
LOW LET
(A)
1.52E-05
2.04E-05
1.44E-03
7.94E-06
1.45E-05
1.77E-05
1.22E-05
3.91E-04
7.68E-06
4.91E-06
1.31E-04
2.73E-05
1.41E-05
2.55E-06
1.09E-05
6.79E-06
1.70E-05
5.28E-06
CONVERSION
(D)
7.19E-05
4.05E-04
2.38E-04
HIGH LET
(A)
1.13E-03
1.29E-02
6.21E-02
3.23E-05
1.26E-04
3.55E-06
3.23E-05
1.19E-04
3.99E-05
1.61E-05
4.30E-05
7.39E-06
3.23E-05
3.23E-05
3.08E-05
3.23E-05
3.23E-05
3.23E-05
AIR
GROUND
IMMERSION SURFACE
(B)
1.68E+07
1.81E+07
9.28E+06
9.69E+06
8.02E+06
7.10E+06
5.81E+06
5.70E+06
7.75E+06
6.93E+06
7.02E+06
6.92E+06
5.28E+06
1.18E+07
7.57E+06
4.91E+06
7.04E+06
1.18E+07
FACTORS FOR 30 YEAR
0>)
8.92E-04
8.92E-04
8.92E-04
(E)
3.54E+08
1.58E+08
2.56E+08
(C) .0
3.98E+03
4.32E+03
2.17E+03
2.44E+03
1.84E+03
1.67E+03
1.36E+03
1.35E+03
1.78E+03
1.59E+03
1.61E+03
1.59E+03
1.23E4-03
2.98E+03
1.74E+03
1.12E+03
1.61E+03
2.74E+03
EXPOSURE PERIOD
(F)
8.94E+04
3.69E+04
6.32E+04
FATAL CANCER RISK
CANCER
R MARROW
ENDOST
PULMNARY
BREAST
LIVER
ST WALL
PANCREAS
LLI WALL
KIDNEYS
BL WALL
ULI WALL
SI WALL
OVARIES
TESTES
SPLEEN /
UTERUS
THYMUS
THYROID
INGESTION
LOW LET
(G)
7.29E-08
6.12E-09
1.04E-08
3.77E-08
9.82E-09
1.68E-08
7.55E-09
2.38E-06
2.73E-09
9.09E-09
1.60E-07
1.29E-08
1.37E-08
1.68E-09
1.09E-09
4.98E-09
2.90E-10
9.26E-10
GENETIC EFFECT RISK
AVERAGE
(J)
3.99E-12
HIGH LET
(G)
7.31E-05
3.91E-05
4.45E-10
1.29E-07
1.82E-06
2.05E-07
3.94E-07
1.53E-05
1.16E-07
5.63E-08
1.76E-06
1.11E-07
5.63E-08
5.63E-08
5.38E-08
5.63E-08
5.63E-08
2.77E-08
CONVERSION
(J)
2.91E-10
CONVERSION FACTORS
INHALATION
LOW LET
(G)
4.70E-06
5.91E-07
8.16E-04
2.94E-06
2.10E-06
1.44E-06
1.37E-06
2.58E-05
2.49E-07
1.61E-07
4.33E-06
4.49E-07
2.32E-07
4.14E-08
1.76E-07
1.11E-07
2.73E-07
4.26E-07
FACTORS
(J)
7.16E-11
HIGH LET
(G)
6.90E-03
3.67E-03
.367
1.19E-05
1.81E-04
2.93E-06
3.62E-05
7.90E-05
1.29E-05
5.17E-06
1.42E-05
1.22E-06
5.17E-06
5.17E-06
4.94E-06
5.17E-06
5.17E-06
2.59E-06
(J)
2.67E-08
FOR LIFETIME EXPOSURE
AIR
IMMERSION
(H)
5.47
.557
5.65
3.87
1.25
.616
.706
.396
.269
.240
.244
.120
9.16E-02
.205
.131
8.52E-02
.122
.999
(K)
7.68E+01
GROUND
SURFACE
(D
1.30E-03
1.33E-04
1.32E-03
9.74E-04
2.87E-04
1.45E-04
1.65E-04
9.37E-05
6.18E-05
5.52E-05
5.59E-05
2.76E-05
2.13E-05
5.17E-05
3.02E-05
1.94E-05
2.79E-05
2.32E-04
(L)
1.89E-02
TABLE OF UNITS
70 YEAR COMMITTED DOSE (MILLIRAD)/(PERSON PICOCURIE)
(MILLIRAD/YR)/(PERSON MICROCURIE/CC)
(MILLIRAD/YR)/(PERSON MICROCURIE/CM**2)
(MILLIRAD)/(PERSON PICOCURIE/YR)
(MILLIRAD)/(PERSON MICROCURIE/CC)
(MILLIRAD)/(PERSON MICROCURIE/CM**2)
(DEATHS)/(1E+5 PERSONS PICOCURIE/YR)
(DEATHS)/(1E+5 PERSONS PICOCURIE/CC)
(DEATHS)/(1E+5 PERSONS PICOCURIE/CM**2)
(GENETIC EFFECTS/LIVE BIRTH)/(PERSON PICOCURIE/YR)
(GENETIC EFFECTS/LIVE BIRTH)/(PERSON MICROCURIE/CC)
(GENETIC EFFECTS/LIVE BIRTH)/(PERSON MICROCURIE/CM**2)
-------
L-17
TABLE L.I
(CONTINUED)
FOR NUCLIDE : RA-224, RESP CLEARANCE CLASS=W, PARTICLE SIZE-1.0 AMAD, F1=0.200E+00
DOSE CONVERSION FACTORS
ORGAN
R MAR
ENDOST
*PUL*
MUSCLE
LIVER
S WALL
PANCREAS
LLI WALL
KIDNEYS
BL WALL
ULI WALL
SI WALL
OVARIES
TESTES
SPLEEN
UTERUS
THYMUS
THYROID
INGESTION
LOW LET
/ A \
(A)
8.41E-07
7.41E-07
8.77E-08
4.06E-07
4.91E-07
5.97E-07
3.59E-07
9.03E-05
5.07E-07
8.91E-07
2.40E-05
3.25E-06
2.73E-06
3.81E-07
3.16E-07
1.12E-06
1.58E-07
1.10E-07
HIGH LET
/ A \
(A)
2.06E-05
1.78E-04
.0
2.89E-06
4.16E-06
7.89E-07
2.89E-06
2.86E-05
3.59E-06
1.44E-06
1.02E-05
1.66E-06
2.89E-06
2.89E-06
2.76E-06
2.89E-06
2.89E-06
2.89E-06
INHALATION
LOW LET
f A V
(A)
4.77E-07
5.10E-07
7-35E-06
2.36E-07
3.47E-07
4.94E-07
2.59E-07
3.47E-05
3.31E-07
3.78E-07
1.01E-05
1.61E-06
1.12E-06
1.88E-07
2.27E-07
5.02E-07
2.13E-07
1.07E-07
GENETICALLY SIGNIFICANT DOSE CONVERSION
TESTES
OVARIES
AVERAGE
(D)
1.14E-05
8.19E-05
4.67E-05
(D)
8.66E-05
8.66E-05
8.66E-05
FATAL CANCER RISK
CANCER
R MARROW
ENDOST
PULMNARY
BREAST-
LIVER
ST WALL
PANCREAS
LLI WALL
KIDNEYS
BL WALL
ULI WALL
SI WALL
OVARIES
TESTES
SPLEEN
UTERUS
THYMUS
THYROID
INGESTION
LOW LET
(G)
2.74E-07
2.28E-08
5.34E-08
1.62E-07
7.67E-08
5.18E-08
4.36E-08
6.26E-06
1.76E-08
3.09E-08
8.33E-07
5.65E-08
4.74E-08
6.61E-09
5.49E-09
1.94E-08
2.74E-09
9.31E-09
GENETIC EFFECT RISK
AVERAGE
/ *r\
1.40E-11
HIGH LET
(G)
1.34E-04
5.49E-05
.0
1.15E-06
6.50E-06
6.84E-07
3.51E-06
1.98E-05
1.25E-06
5.01E-07
3.54E-06
2.87E-07
5.01E-07
5.01E-07
4.79E-07
5.01E-07
5.01E-07
2.45E-07
CONVERSION
(j)
2.59E-09
(D)
5.64E-06
3.37E-05
1.97E-05
HIGH LET
(A)
1.54E-05
1.33E-04
6.14E-04
2.16E-06
2.96E-06
3.08E-07
2.16E-06
1.07E-05
2.93E-06
1.08E-06
3.86E-06
6.42E-07
2.16E-06
2.16E-06
2.07E-06
2.16E-06
- 2.16E-06
2.16E-06
AIR
IMMERSION
(B)
7.61E+07
8 .06E+07
5.04E+07
5.17E+07
4.40E+07
3.99E+07
3.24E+07
3.28E+07
4.21E+07
3.69E+07
4.15E+07
3.92E+07
2.80E+07
6.99E+07
4.75E+07
3.37E+07
4.25E+07
5.26E+07
OROITNTl
\J JAX/ U VtLJ
SURFACE
1.66E+04
1.76E+04
1.10E+04
1 . 1 3E+04
9.58E+03
8.69E+03
7.06E+03
7.16E+03
9.18E+03
^ w ^ \s u I v/ ^
8.05E+03
9.04E+03
8.53E+03
6.11E+03
1.52E+04
1.03E+04
7.34E+03
9.25E+03
1.15E+04
FACTORS FOR 30 YEAR EXPOSURE PERIOD
(D)
6.48E-05
6.48E-05
6.48E-05
CONVERSION FACTORS
INHALATION
LOW LET
(G)
1.55E-07
1.57E-08
4.47E-06
9.40E-08
5.42E-08
4.28E-08
3.15E-08
2.41E-06
1.15E-08
1.31E-08
3.49E-07
2.79E-08
1.95E-08
3.26E-09
3.94E-09
8.71E-09
3.70E-09
9.05E-09
FACTORS
(J)
5.91E-12
HIGH LET
(G)
l.OOE-04
4.09E-05
3.73E-03
8.63E-07
4.63E-06
2.67E-07
2.63E-06
7.41E-06
1.02E-06
3.75E-07
1.34E-06
1.11E-07
3.75E-07
3.75E-07
3.58E-07
3.75E-07
3.75E-07
1.83E-07
(J)
1.95E-09
(E)
2.10E+09
8.40E+08
1.47E+09
(F)
4.56E+05
1 .83E+05
3.20E+05
FOR LIFETIME EXPOSURE
AIR
IMMERSION
(H)
24.8
2.48
30.7
20.6
6.87
3.46
3.94
2.28
1.46
1.28
1.44
.680
.486
1.21
.824
.585
.737
4.45
/ *T\
(K)
4.41E+02
GROUND
SURFACE
(I)
5.40E-03
5.42E-04
6.69E-03
4.51E-03
1.50E-03
7.54E-04
8.58E-04
4.97E-04
3.19E-04
2.79E-04
3.14E-04
1.48E-04
1.06E-04
2.64E-04
1.79E-04
1.27E-04
1.61E-04
9.74E-04
/T \
(D
9.59E-02
TABLE OF UNITS
70 YEAR COMMITTED DOSE (MILLIRAD)/ (PERSON PICOCURIE)
(MILLIRAD/YR)/ (PERSON MICROCURIE/CC)
MILLIRAD /YR)/ (PERSON MICRO CURIE /CM** 2)
MILLIRAD) /(PERSON PICOCURIE/YR)
MILLIRAD) /(PERSON MICROCURIE/CC)
MILLIRAD) /(PERSON MICROCURIE/CM**2)
DEATHS) /(1E+5 PERSONS PICOCURIE/YR
DEATHS) /(1E+5 PERSONS PICOCURIE/CC)
K) -
ENE g>pERSON MICROCURIE/CC)
GMETIC IFFECTS?LIVE BIRTH! /(PERSON mcRocuRiE/CM**2)
-------
L-18
TABLE L.I
(CONTINUED)
FOR NUCLIDE : PB-212, RESP CLEARANCE CLASS=W, PARTICLE SIZE=1.0 AMAD, Fl=0.200E+00
DOSE CONVERSION FACTORS
ORGAN
INGESTION
LOW LET
R MAR
ENDOST
*PUL*
MUSCLE
LIVER
S WALL
PANCREAS
LLI WALL
KIDNEYS
BL WALL
ULI WALL
SI WALL
OVARIES
TESTES
SPLEEN
UTERUS
THYMUS
THYROID
4
4
7
2
9
2
3
2
7
3
2
6
1
1
2
6
8
5
GENETICALLY
TESTES
OVARIES
AVERAGE ,
CANCER
4
3
2
(A)
.76E-07
.80S- 07
.63E-08
.21E-07
.06E-07
.31E-06
.25E-07
.49E-05
.05E-07
.80E-07
.16E-05
.40E-06
.27E-06
.56E-07
.27E-07
.35E-07
.88E-08
.47E-08
HIGH LET
3.
2.
.0
2.
5.
1.
2.
2.
3.
1.
1.
4.
2.
2.
1.
2.
2.
2.
(A)
64E-06
73E-05
08E-07
23E-06
27E-07
08E-07
12E-06
30E-06
04E-07
76E-06
57E-07
08E-07
08E-07
96E-07
08E-07
08E-07
08E-07
INHALATION
LOW LET
2
3
1
1
6
8
2
4
8
1
4
1
3
6
2
1
2
9
(A)
.67E-07
.29E-07
-14E-05
.46E-07
.39E-07
.89E-07
.47E-07
.93E-06
.59E-07
.02E-07
.40E-06
.48E-06
.OOE-07
.06E-08
.04E-07
.77E-07
.58E-07
.20E-08
SIGNIFICANT DOSE CONVERSION
(D)
.68E-06
.82E-05
.15E-05
FATAL
6.
6.
6.
(D)
24E-06
24E-06
24E-06
CANCER RISK
1
9
5
(D)
.82E-06
.01E-06
.4 IE- 06
HIGH LET
2
1
9
1
3
5
1
4
6
9
3
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
(A)
.45E-06
.79E-05
.73E-05
.90E-07
.42E-06
.57E-08
.90E-07
.18E-07
.96E-06
.47E-08
.56E-07
.10E-07
.90E-07
.90E-07
.78E-07
.90E-07
.90E-07
.90E-07
AIR
i
GROUND
IMMERSION SURFACE
(B)
1.15E+09
1.23E+09
7.25E+08
7.49E+08
6.32E+08
5.75E+08
4.62E+08
4.67E+08
6.08E+08
5.34E+08
5.85E+08
5.55E+08
4.06E+08
9.78E+08
6.64E+08
4.55E+08
5.95E+08
7.98E+08
FACTORS FOR 30 YEAR
5
5
5
CONVERSION
INGESTION
LOW LET
R MARROW
ENDOST
PULMNARY
BREAST
LIVER
ST WALL
PANCREAS
LLI WALL
KIDNEYS
BL WALL
ULI WALL
SI WALL
OVARIES
TESTES
SPLEEN
UTERUS
THYMUS
THYROID
1
1
4
8
1
2
3
1
2
1
7
1
2
2
3
1
1
4
(G)
-55E-07
.48E-08
.64E-08
.83E-08
.42E-07
.01E-07
.95E-08
.73E-06
.45E-08
.32E-08
.48E-07
.11E-07
.21E-08
.70E-09
.93E-09
.10E-08
.54E-09
.63E-09
GENETIC EFFECT RISK
AVERAGE
6
(J)
.44E-12
HIGH LET
2.
8.
(G)
37E-05
40E-06
.0
8.
8.
1.
2.
1.
1.
3.
6.
7.
3.
3.
3.
3.
3.
1.
30E-08
16E-06
10E-07
53E-07
47E-06
15E-06
6 IE- 08
09E-07
93E-08
61E-08
61E-08
40E-08
61E-08
61E-08
76E-08
CONVERSION
1.
(J)
88E-10
(D)
.69E-06
.69E-06
.69E-06
FACTORS
INHALATION
LOW LET
8
1
6
5
9
7
3
3
2
3
1
2
5
1
3
3
4
7
(G)
.69E-08
.01E-08
.92E-06
.84E-08
.98E-08
.72E-08
.OOE-08
.42E-07
.98E-08
.54E-09
.53E-07
.57E-08
.21E-09
.05E-09
.53E-09
.08E-09
.48E-09
.79E-09
HIGH LET
1
5
5
7
5
4
2
2
2
3
1
1
3
3
3
3
3
1
(G)
.59E-05
.52E-06
.92E-04
.56E-08
.35E-06
.84E-08
.30E-07
.90E-07
.42E-06
.29E-08
.24E-07
.91E-08
.29E-08
.29E-08
.10E-08
.29E-08
.29E-08
.60E-08
(E)
2.93E+10
1.22E+10
2.08E+10
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
9
2
1
1
1
1
(C)
.57E+05
.75E+05
.61E+05
.66E+05
.40E+05
.27E+05
.02E+05
.03E+05
.35E+05
.18E+05
.29E+05
.23E+05
.02E+04
.16E+05
.47E+05
.OOE+05
.31E+05
.78E+05
EXPOSURE PERIOD
6
2
4
FOR LIFETIME
AIR
IMMERSION
(H)
374.
37.9
440.
298.
98.6
49.9
56.1
32.4
21.1
18.5
20.3
9.63
7.04
17.0
11.5
7.89
10.3
67.5
(F)
.48E+06
.71E+06
.59E+06
EXPOSURE
GROUND
SURFACE
8
8
9
6
2
1
1
7
4
4
4
2
1
3
2
1
2
1
(D
.37E-02
.46E-03
.79E-02
.62E-02
.19E-02
.10E-02
.24E-02
.15E-03
.68E-03
.09E-03
.48E-03
.13E-03
.57E-03
.75E-03
.55E-03
.74E-03
.27E-03
,5 IE- 02
FACTORS
1
(J)
.62E-12
1
(J)
.7 IE- 10
(K)
6.23E+03
1
(L)
.38E+00
TABLE OF UNITS
70 YEAR COMMITTED DOSE (MILLIRAD)/(PERSON PICOCURIE)
(MILLIRAD/YR)/(PERSON MICROCURIE/CC)
(MILLIRAD/YR)/(PERSON MICROCURIE/CM**2)
(MILLIRAD)/(PERSON PICOCURIE/YR)
MILLIRAD)/(PERSON MICROCURIE/CC)
MILLIRAD)/(PERSON MICROCURIE/CM*^2)
DEATHS)/(1E+5 PERSONS PICOCURIE/YR)
DEATHS)/(1E+5 PERSONS PICOCURIE/CC)
(DEATHS)/(1E+5 PERSONS PICOCURIE/CM**2)
(GENETIC EFFECTS/LIVE BIRTH)/(PERSON PICOCURIE/YR)
(GENETIC EFFECTS/LIVE BIRTH)/(PERSON MICROCURIE/CC)
(GENETIC EFFECTS/LIVE BIRTH) / (PERSON MICROCURIE/CM**2)
-------
TABLE L.I
(CONTINUED)
L-19
FOR NUCLIDE : BI-212, RESP CLEARANCE CLASS-W, PARTICLE SIZE-1.0 AMAD, F1=0.500E-01
DOSE CONVERSION FACTORS
ORGAN
R MAR
ENDOST
*PUL*
MUSCLE
LIVER
S WALL
PANCREAS
LLI WALL
KIDNEYS
BL WALL
ULI WALL
SI WALL
OVARIES
TESTES
SPLEEN
UTERUS
THYMUS
THYROID
INGESTION
LOW LET HIGH LET
(A)
3.34E-09
9.66E-09
7.98E-10
2.23E-09
-2.15E-09
1.98E-07
2.23E-09
1.40E-08
2.51E-07
1.51E-09
7.77E-08
1.30E-07
2.23E-09
2.23E-09
2.15E-09
2.23E-09
2.23E-09
(A)
43E-08
24E-08
29E-08
08E-08
79E-08
95E-06
9»57E-08
1.72E-07
7.68E-08
2.29E-08
8.74E-07
1.23E-06
7.08E-08
8.85E-09
5.77E-08
5.72E-08
9.85E-09
5.17E-09
2.23E-09
INHALATION
LOW LET
/ A \
(A)
1.25E-08
l.OOE-08
9.87E-07
1.24E-08
2.04E-08
8.49E-08
2.37E-08
8.14E-09
1.81E-07
3.54E-09
3.53E-08
4.68E-08
6.52E-09
2.96E-09
2.15E-08
6.59E-09
3.01E-08
1.01E-08
HIGH LET
* * %
(A)
2.35E-08
6.80E-08
1.06E-05
1.57E-08
1.5 IE- 08
1.23E-08
1.57E-08
6.06E-09
1.76E-06
1.06E-08
8.24E-09
l.OOE-08
1.57E-08
1.57E-08
1.51E-08
1.57E-08
1.57E-08
1.57E-08
AIR
IMMERSION
(B)
1.08E+09
1-15E+09
9.78E+08
1.04E+09
8.85E+08
9.43E+08
8.64E+08
7.66E+08
8.75E+08
8.89E+08
9.71E+08
7.91E+08
6.87E+08
9.14E+08
1.04E+09
7.18E+08
7.86E+08
8.81E+08
GROUND
SURFACE
(C)
2.00E+05
2.14E+05
1.80E+05
1.92E+05
1.63E+05
1.74E+05
1.58E+05
1.40E+05
1.63E+05
1.64E+05
1.78E+05
1.46E+05
1.23E+05
1.71E+05
1.93E+05
1.32E+05
1.43E+05
1.61E+05
GENETICALLY SIGNIFICANT DOSE CONVERSION FACTORS FOR 30 YEAR EXPOSURE PERIOD
(D) (D) (D) (D) (E) (F)
TESTES 2.6.5E-07 6.68E-08 8.88E-08 4.70E-07 2.74E+10 5.13E+06
OVARIES 2.12E-06 6.68E-08 1.95E-07 4.70E-07 2.06E+10 3.69E+06
AVERAGE 1.19E-06 6.68E-08 1.42E-07 4.70E-07 2.40E+10 4.41E+06
FATAL CANCER RISK
CANCER INGESTION
LOW LET HIGH LET
(G)
.92E-09
.82E-10
.88E-09
R MARROW
ENDOST
PULMNARY
BREAST
LIVER
ST WALL
PANCREAS
LLI WALL
KIDNEYS
BL WALL
ULI WALL
SI WALL
OVARIES
TESTES
SPLEEN
UTERUS
THYMUS
THYROID
2,
2,
4.
1,
1,
1,
2
7
3
7
8.30E-09
36E-09
70E-07
16E-08
19E-08
67E-09
7.95E-10
3.03E-08
2.13E-08
1.23E-09
1.54E-10
l.OOE-09
9.93E-10
1.71E-10
4.37E-10
GENETIC EFFECT RISK CONVERSION
s (J) (J)
AVERAGE 3.59E-13 2.01E-12
(G)
18E-08
.97E-09
4.86E-09
8.89E-10
3.36E-09
1.72E-07
2.71E-09
9.72E-09
8.69E-08
5.25E-10
2.70E-08
2.26E-08
3.87E-10
3.87E-10
3.73E-10
.87E-10
87E-10
3,
3,
1.89E-10
CONVERSION FACTORS
INHALATION
LOW LET HIGH LET
(G)
4.08E-09
3.09E-10
6.00E-07
4.96E-09
3.19E-09
7.36E-09
2.88E-09
5.65E-10
6.29E-09
1.23E-10
1.23E-09
8.12E-10
1.13E-10
5.13E-11
3.73E-10
1.14E-10
5.2 IE-10
8.53E-10
FACTORS
FOR LIFETIME EXPOSURE
(G)
1.53E-07
2.09E-08
6.44E-05
6.25E-09
2.36E-08
1.07E-08
1.90E-08
4.21E-09
6.11E-07
3.69E-09
2.86E-09
.74E-09
72E-09
.72E-09
2.62E-09
2.72E-09
2.72E-09
1.33E-09
1,
2,
2,
(J)
4.26E-14
(J)
1.41E-11
AIR
IMMERSION
(H)
352.
35.4
593.
415.
138.
81.8
105.
53.1
30.4
30.8
33.7
13.7
11.9
15.9
18.0
12.5
13.6
74.6
(K)
7.20E+03
GROUND
SURFACE
(D
6.51E-02
6.59E-03
.110
7.66E-02
2.55E-02
1.51E-02
1.92E-02
9.72E-03
5.66E-03
5.69E-03
6.18E-03
2.53E-03
2.13E-03
2.97E-03
3.35E-03
2.29E-03
2.48E-03
1.36E-02
(L)
1.32E+00
TABLE OF UNITS
70 YEAR COMMITTED DOSE (MILLIRAD)/ (PERSON PICOCURIE)
MILLIRAD/YR) /(PERSON MICROCURIE/CC)
MILLIRAD /YR / (PERSON MICROCUME/CM**2)
MILLIRAD) /(PERSON PICOCURIE/YR)
/ (PERSON MICROCURIE/CC)
BIRTHJ ^PERSON MICROCURIE/CM**2)
MILLIRAD
-------
TABLE L.I
(CONTINUED)
L-20
FOR NUCLIDE : TL-208, RESP CLEARANCE CLASS=W, PARTICLE SIZE-1.0 AMAD, F1 = 0.950E+00
DOSE CONVERSION FACTORS
ORGAN
R MAR
ENDOST
*PUL*
MUSCLE
LIVER
S WALL
PANCREAS
LLI WALL
KIDNEYS
BL WALL
ULI WALL
SI WALL
OVARIES
TESTES
SPLEEN
UTERUS
THYMUS
THYROID
INGESTION
LOW LET
(A)
1.72E-09
1.03E-09
2.57E-09
2.23E-09
3.22E-09
2.45E-07
2.25E-08
2.45E-09
5.12E-09
8.99E-10
6.36E-09
1.20E-08
2.10E-09
3.71E-10
1.26E-08
2.24E-09
8.80E-10
3.65E-10
HIGH LET
(A)
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
INHALATION
LOW LET
(A)
1.28E-09
1.03E-09
5.01E-08
1.33E-09
2.30E-09
2.35E-09
2.32E-09
1.17E-10
1.19E-09
1.55E-10
5.22E-10
4.18E-10
2.57E-10
1.05E-10
2.18E-09
2.98E-10
3.81E-09
1.11E-09
GENETICALLY SIGNIFICANT DOSE CONVERSION
TESTES
OVARIES
AVERAGE
CANCER
R MARROW
ENDOST
PULMNARY
BREAST
LIVER
ST WALL
PANCREAS
LLI WALL
KIDNEYS
BL WALL
ULI WALL
SI WALL
OVARIES
TESTES
SPLEEN
UTERUS
THYMUS
THYROID ,
(D)
1.11E-08
6.29E-08
3.70E-08
FATAL
(D)
.0
.0
.0 '
CANCER RISK
INGESTION
LOW LET
(G)
5.59E-10
3.16E-11
1.56E-09
8.89E-10
5.02E-10
2.13E-08
2.73E-09
1.70E-10
1.78E-10
3.12E-11
2.21E-10
2.07E-10
3.64E-11
6.44E-12
2.18E-10
3.89E-11
1.53E-11
3.09E-11
GENETIC EFFECT RISK
X
AVERAGE
(J)
1.11E-14
HIGH LET
(G)
.0
.0 ,
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
CONVERSION
(J)
O.OOE-01
(D)
3.16E-09
7.70E-09
5.43E-09
HIGH LET
(A)
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
AIR
IMMERSION
(B)
1.90E+10
2.13E+10
1.91E+10
2.01E+10
1.82E+10
1.67E+10
2.33E+10
1.66E+10
1.61E+10
1.96E+10
2.20E+10
1.67E+10
1.85E+10
1.31E+10
1.60E+10
1.55E4-10
2.26E+10
2.25E+10
FACTORS FOR 30 YEAR
(D)
.0
.0
.0
CONVERSION FACTORS
INHALATION
LOW LET
(G)
4.18E-10
3.17E-11
3.05E-08
5.30E-10
3.59E-10
2.04E-10
2.82E-10
8.15E-12
4.12E-11
5.39E-12
1.81E-11
7.25E-12
4.46E-12
1.82E-12
3.79E-11
5.17E-12
6.62E-11
9.40E-11
FACTORS
(J)
1.64E-15
HIGH LET
(G)
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
(J)
O.OOE-01
(E)
3.93E+11
5.55E+11
4.74E+11
GROUND
SURFACE
(C)
2.98E+06
3.32E+06
2.94E+06
3.10E+06
2.79E+06
2.60E+06
3.46E+06
2.52E+06
2.50E+06
2.98E+06
3.32E+06
2.55E+06
2.72E+06
2.13E+06
2.53E+06
2.36E+06
3.36E+06
3.39E+06
EXPOSURE PERIOD
(F)
6.39E+07
8.16E+07
7.28E+07
FOR LIFETIME EXPOSURE
AIR
IMMERSION
(H)
6.18E+03
656.
1.16E+04
8.02E+03
2.84E+03
1.45E+03
2.83E+03
1.15E+03
559.
680.
763.
290.
321.
227.
278.
269.
392.
1.90E+Q3
(K)
1.42E+05
GROUND
SURFACE
(I)
.970
.102
1.79
1.24
.436
.226
.420
.175
8.68E-02
.103
.115
4.42E-02
4.72E-02
3.70E-02
4.39E-02
4.09E-02
5.83E-02
.287
(L)
2.18E+01
TABLE OF UNITS
A) -
T>
C
D
E
TJI
G
H
I
J
K) -
L) -
70 YEAR COMMITTED DOSE (MILLIRAD)/(PERSON PICOCURIE)
(MILLIRAD/YR)/(PERSON MICROCURIE/CC)
(MILLIRAD/YR)/(PERSON MICROCURIE/CM**2)
(MILLIRAD)/(PERSON PICOCURIE/YR)
MILLIRAD)/(PERSON MICROCURIE/CC)
MILLIRAD)/(PERSON MICROCURIE/CM**2)
DEATHS)/(1E+5 PERSONS PICOCURIE/YR)
DEATHS)/(lE+5 PERSONS PICOCURIE/CC)
(DEATHS)/(1E+5 PERSONS PICOCURIE/CM**2)
(GENETIC EFFECTS/LIVE BIRTH)/(PERSON PICOCURIE/YR)
(GENETIC EFFECTS/LIVE BIRTH)/(PERSON MICROCURIE/CC)
(GENETIC EFFECTS/LIVE BIRTH)/(PERSON MICROCURIE/CM**2)
-------
L-21
Table L.2
ADDITIONAL INPUT DATA USED BY DARTAB IN THE
HEALTH IMPACT ASSESSMENT OF AIRBORNE EMISSIONS
Ground surface correction factor for external dose = 0.50
Quality factor = 1.0 (low LET) and 20.0 (high LET)
Genetic effect risk coefficient for genetically significant dose (GSD) =
300 effects/106 live birth rad(GSD) (low LET) and
30000 effects/106 live birth rad (GSD) (high LET)
Regional population birth rate = 0.14133E-01 births/yr
Average lifetime expectancy = 70.7565 years
Rn-222 decay products risk conversion factor for a lifetime exposure =
1.69 cancer deaths/person-WL
Organ dose weighting factors used to determine weighted mean dose equivalent
target organ weighting factor
red marrow 0.15590
endosteal cells 0.01470
pulmonary 0.29080
muscle 0.19080
liver 0.07460
stomach wall 0.04150
pancreas 0-05810
LLI wall 0-03320
kidneys °-01660
bladder wall 0.01660
ULI wall O-01660
SI wall O-00830
ovaries 0'00830
testes °'00830
spleen °-00830
uterus °-00830
thymus °'00830
thyroid °'04050
-------
L-22
TABLE L.3. EXAMPLE INPUT DATA FILE FOR DARTAB
ACT. AV. SURFACE MINE(ORE SOURCE)-MAX. INDIV. DOSE AND RISK PARAMETERS
&INPUT
ILOC=0, JLOC=0, PLOC=100., ILET=2*1,
DTABLE=0, 0, 1, 1, 0, 0, 1,
RTABLE=0, 0, 1, 1, 0, 0, 1,
FTABLE=0, 0, 1, 1, 0, 0, 1,
OUTPUT=F, GSCFAC=0.5,
&END
&ORGAN
NORGN=18,
ORGN='R MAR', 'ENDOST', '*PUL*', 'MUSCLE', 'LIVER', 'S WALL',
'PANCREAS', 'LLI WALL', 'KIDNEYS', 'BL WALL', 'ULI WALL', 'SI WALL',
'OVARIES', 'TESTES', 'SPLEEN','UTERUS', 'THYMUS', 'THYROID',
TIME=20*70.,
&END
&QFACTR
LLET=20*1., HLET=20*20.,
&CANCER
NCANC=18,
CANC='R MARROW', 'ENDOST', 'PULMNARY', 'BREAST', 'LIVER', 'ST WALL',
'PANCREAS', 'LLI WALL', 'KIDNEYS', 'BL WALL', 'ULI WALL', 'SI WALL',
'OVARIES', 'TESTES', 'SPLEEN', 'UTERUS', 'THYMUS', 'THYROID',
RELABS=20*1.,
&END
&GENTIC
GENEFF=T, NGEN=3, GEN='TESTES', 'OVARIES', 'AVERAGE',
GRFAC=200., 20000., REPPER=.014133,
GLLET=3*1., GHLET=3*20.,
&END
&LOCTBL
NTLOC=1,
RNLOC='SUM',
OGLOC='SUM',
PTLOC=7,
FALOC=2,
HLLOC=1,
LTABLE=1,
&END
&ORGANF
,NORGB=18,
'ORGB='R MAR', 'ENDOST', '*PUL*', 'MUSCLE', 'LIVER', 'SWALL',
'PANCREAS', 'LLI WALL', 'KIDNEYS', 'BL WALL', 'ULI WALL', 'SI WALL',
'OVARIES', 'TESTES', 'SPLEEN','UTERUS', 'THYMUS', 'THYROID',
IPATH=18*5,
ORGDAT=.1559, .0147, .2908, .1908, .0746, .0415, .0581, .0332, .0166,
.0166, .0166, .0083, .0083, .0083, .0083, .0083, .0083, .0405,
&END
-------
L-23
Table L.4 Maximum individual fatal cancer risk for one year
of exposure to atmospheric radioactive emissions
from model uranium mines
Source
Mining
Activities
Li
fetime
Ore
tata
1 cancer
Sub-ore
risk
Overburden
Vehicular
Dust
Total
Average
Surface Mine
Particulates & Rn-222 1.6E-7
Rn-222 daughters 3.3E-6
Total 3.5E-6
Average Large
Surface Mine
Particulates & Rn-222 9.6E-7
Rn-222 daughters 1.3E-5
Total 1.4E-5
Average
Underground Mine
Particulates & Rn-222 3.1E-8
Rn-222 daughters 9.0E-6
Total 9.0E-6
Average Large
Underground Mine
Particulates & Rn-222 3.4E-7
Rn-222 daughters l.OE-4
Total l.OE-4
Inactive
Surface Mine
Particulates & Rn-222 0
Rn-222 daughters 1.3E-7
Total 1.3E-7
Inactive
Underground Mine
Particulates & Rn-222 0
Rn-222 daughters 2.2E-7
Total 2.2E-7
In situ
Leach Mine
Particulates & Rn-222 1.6E-6
Rn-222 daughters 1.1E-5
Total 1-3E-5
3.6E-7 1.7E-8 8.4E-8 4.8E-8 6.7E-7
7.0E-7 8.3E-7 6.6E-7 0 5.5E-6
1.1E-6 8.5E-7 7.5E-7 4.8E-8 6.2E-6
1.9E-6 5.9E-8 4.7E-7 2.9E-7 3.7E-6
1.3E-6 2.8E-6 2.9E-6 0 1.9E-5
3.2E-6 2.8E-6 3.4E-6 2.9E-7 2.3E-5
5.8E-8 6.5E-8 6.3E-10 4.0E-9 1.6E-7
2.2E-7 1.8E-6 1.4E-8 0 1.1E-5
2.8E-7 1.9E-6 1.5E-8 4.0E-9 1.1E-5
8.0E-9 1.4E-6
0 1.1E-4
8.0E-9 1.1E-4
6.4E-7
2.0E-6
2.6E-6
3.7E-7
9.8E-6
l.OE-5
3.3E-9
7.6E-8
7.9E-8
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
(a)
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
LA.
LA.
LA.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
1.5E-8W N.A.
5.0E-8 ? N.A.
6.5E-8W N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
5.5E-8
4.2E-7
4.7E-7
1.5E-8
2.7E-7
2.8E-7
1.6E-6
1.1E-5
1.3E-5
covered over by sub-ore (see Sections 3.7.1.1 and 3.7.2.1)
-------
L-24
Table L.5 Fatal cancer risk to an average individual in the regional
population for one year of exposure to atmospheric radio-
active emissions from model uranium mines
Source
Average
Surface Mine
Particulates & Rn-222
Rn-222 daughters
Total
Average Large
Surface Mine
Particulates & Rn-222
Rn-222 daughters
Total
Average
Underground Mine
Particulates & Rn-222
Rn-222 daughters
Total
Average Large
Underground Mine
Particulates & Rn-222
Rn-222 daughters
Total
Inactive
Surface Mine
Particulates & Rn-222
Rn-222 daughters
Total
Inactive
Underground Mine
Particulates & Rn-222
Rn-222 daughters
Total
In situ
Leach Mine
Particulates & Rn-222
Rn-222 daughters
Total
Mining
Activities
1.9E-10
6.5E-9
6.7E-9
1.1E-9
2.6E-8
2.7E-8
9.7E-11
4.0E-8
4.0E-8
1.1E-9
4.5E-7
4.5E-7
0
2.6E-10
2.6E-10
0
9.9E-10
9.9E-10
8.7E-10
2.1E-8
2.2E-8
Lifetime
Ore
4.0E-10
1.4E-9
1.8E-9
1.7E-9
3.1E-9
4.8E-9
7.8E-11
l.OE-9
1.1E-9
8.6E-10
9.0E-9
9.9E-9
(\
,,.n. 3)
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
fatal cancer
Sub-ore
2.0E-11
1.6E-9
1.6E-9
7.0E-11
5.4E-9
5.5E-9
9.8E-11
8.0E-9
8.1E-9
5.6E-10
4.4E-8
4.5E-8
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
risk
Overburden
9.1E-11
1.3E-9
1.4E-9
5.5E-10
6.6E-9
7.1E-9
9.2E-13
6.6E-11
6.7E-11
4.9E-12
3.4E-10
3.4E-10
/ L. \
6.4E-11 b
5.7E-10 °
6.3E-10(b)
1 1.\
2.0E-11 b
2.2E-10 °{
2.4E-10(b)
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
Vehicular
Dust
4.7E-11
0
4.7E-11
2.8E-10
0
2.8E-10
6.5E-12
0
6.5E-12
1.3E-11
0
1.3E-11
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
Total
7.5E-10
1.1E-8
1.2E-8
3.7E-9
4.1E-8
4.5E-8
2.8E-10
4.9E-8
4.9E-8
2.5E-9
5.0E-7
5.0E-7
6.4E-11
8.3E-10
8.9E-10
2.0E-11
1.2E-9
1.2E-9
8.7E-10
2.1E-8
2.2E-8
(a)
N.A. - not applicable.
^ 'Consists of waste rock covered over by sub-ore (see Sections 3.7.1.1 and 3.7.2.1).
-------
L-25
Table L.6 Fatal cancer risk to the population for one year of exposure
to atmospheric radioactive emissions from model uranium mines
Estimated
Source
Mining
Activities
Ore
fata cancers
Sub-ore
Overburden
Vehicular
Dust
Total
Average
Surface Mine
Particulates & Rn-222 2.6E-6
Rn-222 daughters 9.3E-5
Total 9.5E-5
Average Large
Surface Mine
Particulates & Rn-222 1.6E-5
Rn-222 daughters 3.7E-4
Total 3.9E-4
Average
Underground Mine
Particulates & Rn-222 3.5E-6
Rn-222 daughters 1.4E-3
Total 1.4E-3
Average Large
Underground Mine
Particulates & Rn-222 3.8E-5
Rn-222 daughters 1.6E-2
Total 1.6E-2
Inactive
Surface Mine
Particulates & Rn-222 0
Rn-222 daughters 3.8E-6
Total 3.8E-6
Inactive
Underground Mine
Particulates & Rn-222 0
Rn-222 daughters 3.6E-5
Total 3.6E-5
In situ
Leach Mine
Particulates & Rn-222 1.2E-5
Rn-222 daughters 3.0E-4
Total 3.1E-4
5.7E-6
2.0E-5
2.6E-5
2.5E-5
4.5E-5
7.0E-5
2.8E-6
3.6E-5
3.9E-5
3.1E-5
3.2E-4
3.5E-4
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
(a)
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
2.8E-7
2.3E-5
2.4E-5
l.OE-6
7.7E-5
7.8E-5
3.5E-6
2.9E-4
2.9E-4
2.0E-5
1.6E-3
1.6E-3
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
1.3E-6
1.9E-5
2.0E-5
7.9E-6
9.4E-5
l.OE-4
3.3E-8
2.4E-6
2.4E-6
1.8E-7
1.2E-5
1.2E-5
9 lF-7(b)
fb)
8.1E-6 J
9.0E-610'
8"OE'6(b)
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
6.8E-7
0
6.8E-7
4.0E-6
0
4.0E-6
2.3E-7
0
2.3E-7
4.6E-7
0
4.6E-7
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
1.1E-5
1.6E-4
1.7E-4
5.4E-5
5.9E-4
6.4E-4
l.OE-5
1.7E-3
1.7E-3
9.0E-5
1.8E-2
1.8E-2
9.1E-7
1.2E-5
1.3E-5
7.4E-7
4.4E-5
4.5E-5
1.2E-5
3.0E-4
3.1E-4
. - Not applicable.
(b)
Consists of waste rock covered over by sub-ore (see Sections 3.7.1.1 and 3.7.2.1),
-------
1-26
Table L.7 Genetic effect risk to descendants of maximum exposed
individual for one year of parental exposure to atmo-
spheric radioactive particulate and Rn-222 emissions
from model uranium mines
Genetic risk (effects/birth)
Source
Average
Surface Mine
Average Large
Surface Mine
Average
Underground Mine
Average Large
Underground Mine
Inactive
Surface Mine
Inactive
Underground Mine
In situ
Leach Mine
Mining
Activities
1.5E-7
9.2E-7
1.3E-8
1.4E-7
3.9E-13
6.3E-13
8.0E-9
Ore
3.4E-7
2.0E-6
5.7E-8
6.3E-7
N.A.(a)
N.A.
N.A.
Sub-ore
1.5E-8
5.2E-8
6.2E-8
3.4E-7
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
Overburden
8.0E-8
4.5E-7
5.8E-10
3.2E-9
6.0E-8(b)
1.6E-8(b)
N.A.
Vehicul
Dust
4.4E-8
2.6E-7
3.6E-9
7.2E-9
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
ar
Total
6.3E-7
3.7E-6
1.4E-7
1.1E-6
6.0E-8
1.6E-8
8.0E-9
(a)
(b)
N.A. - Mot applicable.
Consists of waste rock covered over by sub-ore (see Sections 3.7.1.1 and 3.7.2.1).
-------
L-27
Table L.8 Genetic effect risk to descendants of average individual
of the population for one year of parental exposure to
atmospheric radioactive particulate and Rn-222 emissions
from model uranium mines
Genetic risk (effects/birth)
Source
Mining
Activities Ore
Vehicular
Sub-ore Overburden Dust Total
Average
Surface Mine
Average Large
Surface Mine
Average
Underground Mine
Average Large
Underground Mine
6.2E-10 1.4E-9 6.0E-11 3.3E-10 1.6E-10 2.6E-9
3.8E-9
6.3E-9 2.1E-10 2.0E-9 9.6E-10 1.3E-8
2.7E-11 1.2E-10 1.3E-10 1.2E-12 9.3E-12 2.9E-10
3.0E-10 1.3E-9 7.4E-10
5.4E-12 1.8E-11 2.4E-9
Inactive
Surface Mine
Inactive
Underground Mine
In situ
Leach Mine
7.5E-16
2.8E-15
2.7E-11
N.A.(a)
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
2.4E-10(b)
3.4E-ll(b)
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
2.4E-10
3.4E-11
2.7E-11
N.A. - Not applicable.
^Consists of waste rock covered over by sub-ore (see Sections 3.7.1.1 and 3.7.2.1).
-------
L-28
Table L.9 Genetic effect risk to descendants of the regional
population for one year of parental exposure to
atmospheric radioactive particulates and Rn-222
emissions from model uranium mines
Source
Average
Surface Mine
Average Large
Surface Mine
Average
Underground Mine
Average Large
Underground Mine
Inactive
Surface Mine
Inactive
Underground Mine
In situ
Leach Mine
Mining
Activities
3.8E-6
2.2E-5
4.2E-7
4.5E-6
4.5E-12
4.3E-11
1.6E-7
Genetic
Ore
8.6E-6
3.8E-5
1.8E-6
2.0E-5
N.A.(a)
N.A.
N.A.
risk (effects/yr)
Sub-ore Overburden
3.6E-7 2.0E-6
1.3E-6 1.2E-5
2.0E-6 1.8E-8
1.1E-5 9.9E-8
N.A. 1.4E-6(b)
N.A. 5.0E-7^
N.A. N.A.
Vehicular
Dust
9.9E-7 1
5.8E-6 7
1.4E-7 4
2.8E-7 3
N.A. 1
N.A. 5
N.A. 1
Total
.6E-5
.9E-5
.4E-6
.6E-5
.4E-6
.OE-7
.6E-7
(a)
(b)
N.A. - Not applicable.
Consists of waste rock covered over by sub-ore (see Sections 3.7.1.1 and 3.7.2.1).
-------
L-29
L.3 References
Be80 Begovich, C.L., Eckennan, K.F., Schlatter, E.G. and Ohr, S.Y., 1980,
"DARTAB: A Program to Combine Airborne Radionuclide Environmental
Exposure Data with Dosimetric and Health Effects Data to Generate
Tabulations of Predicted Impacts," ORNL-5692 (Draft).
Du80 Dunning, D.E. Jr., Leggett, R.W. and Yalcintas, M.G., 1980, "A Combined
Methodology for Estimating Dose Rates and Health Effects from Exposure
to Radioactive Pollutants," ORNL/TM-7105.
Ge78 George, A.C. and Breslin, A.J., 1978, "The Distribution of Ambient
Radon and Radon Daughters in Residential Buildings in the New Jersey -
New York Area," presented at the symposium on the Natural Radiation
Environment III, Houston, Texas, April 23-28.
Mo79 Moore, R.E., Baes, C.F. Ill, McDowell-Boyer, L.M., Watson, A.P.,
Hoffman, P.O., Pleasant, J.C., and Miller, C.W., 1979, "AIRDOS-EPA:
A Computerized Methodology for Estimating Environmental Concentrations
and Dose to Man from Airborne Releases of Radionuclides," U.S. Environ-
mental Protection Agency Rept., EPA 520/1-79-009 (Reprint of ORNL-5532).
UN77 United Nations, 1977, "Sources and Effects of Ionizing Radiations:
UNSCEAR 1977 Report", United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects
of Atomic Radiation, 1977 report to the General Assembly, with annexes,
United Nations Publication Sales No. E.77.IX.1.
------- |