EPA-R2-73-151
MARCH 1973             Environmental Protection Technology Series
Feasibility Study Lake Hope  Mine
Drainage Demonstration Project
                               Office of Research and Monitoring

                               U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

                               Washington, D.C. 20460

-------
            RESEARCH REPORTING SERIES
Research reports of the  Office  of  Research  and
Monitoring,  Environmental Protection Agency, have
been grouped into five series.  These  five  broad
categories  were established to facilitate further
development  and  application   of   environmental
technology.   Elimination  of traditional grouping
was  consciously  planned  to  foster   technology
transfer   and  a  maximum  interface  in  related
fields.  The five series are:

   1.  Environmental Health Effects Research
   2.  Environmental Protection Technology
   3.  Ecological Research
   4.  Environmental Monitoring
   5.  Socioeconomic Environmental studies

This report has been assigned to the ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION   TECHNOLOGY   series.    This   series
describes   research   performed  to  develop  and
demonstrate   instrumentation,    equipment    and
methodology  to  repair  or  prevent environmental
degradation from point and  non-point  sources  of
pollution.  This work provides the new or improved
technology  required for the control and treatment
of pollution sources to meet environmental quality
standards.

-------
                                                       EPA-R2-73-151
                                                       March  1973
                   FEASIBILITY STUDY
     LAKE HOPE MINE DRAINAGE DEMONSTRATION PROJECT
                    Project IbOlO HJQ,
                     Project Officer

                     Eugene F. Harris
             Environmental Protection Agency
          National Environmental Research Center
                 Cincinnati, Ohio
                      Prepared For
             Office of Research and Monitoring
            U.S.  Environmental Protection Agency
                    Washington, D.C.  20M50
For sale by the Superintendent of |)dlfetUMdts> WS? Government Printing Office, Washington, D.O. 20402
              Price $l&ae*nesticipo%$baid_oj SldHjylJPO Bookstore

-------
                       EPA Review Notice
This report has been reviewed by the Environmental Protection
Agency and approved for publication..: Approval does not signify
that the contents necessarily reflect the views and policies of
the Environmental Protection Agency, nor does mention of trade
names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommen-
dation for use.
                               ii

-------
                            ABSTRACT

The purpose of the Lake Hope project is to demonstrate the  reduction of
acid mine drainage pollution by the removal of coal refuse, and the con-
struction of bulkhead seals to flood underground mine workings and thus
prevent the formation of acid.  The Lake Hope site was chosen for the
demonstration project because acidic drainage from abandoned coal mines
in the watershed above Lake Hope has severely restricted water oriented
activity in this prime recreational area.  A total of 107 mine openings
has been noted.  The combined acid discharge from these openings is
over 700,000 pounds per year.  A multi-phase mine drainage  abatement
demonstration program is recommended with major elements including:

     1.  Removal and/or burial of coal refuse which was scattered
         throughout the area during active mining operations.

     2.  The sealing of a portion of Mine Complex kl (Mine  Openings kQ
         through 52 shown in Figure 2) with subsequent monitoring of
         the effectiveness of the mine seals.

     3-  Sealing of the balance of the mine openings in Mine Complex kl.

     k.  Sealing of Mine Opening 88 and adjacent interconnected openings
         if necessary to achieve the desired improvement in Lake Hope
         water quality.

Expansive concrete seals or alternative plain concrete plugs are
recommended for the first phase mine sealing.  Curtain grouting will
be necessary to seal the face of the hill above and adjacent to the
mine openings and at intermediate points of weakness of the geological
structure.

Over a year of base line water quality information has already been
accumulated to serve as a standard against which effectiveness of the
demonstration project can be measured.  At the present time, water in
Lake Hope normally exhibits pH between 4.0 and 5-0 and the  total acidity
is frequently in the 20 to 30 mg/1 range.  Following completion of the
Phase  I and Phase  II mine sealing programs, total acidity of the water
in the lake is expected to be approximately one-half of present levels
and pH should be in the 6.0 to 7-0 range.

In 1970, over 650,000 persons visited Lake Hope State Park.  The im-
proved water environment resulting from the mine drainage demonstration
project will greatly improve the enjoyment of visitors to the area and
will result in more extensive water-oriented recreational activities.
Aquatic habitat will be greatly improved with resulting wild life
management and fishing benefits.  The general area aesthetics will
also be improved with the removal of coal refuse and elimination of
a significant portion of iron-bearing acid mine drainage from the
area streams.
                                ill

-------
                            CONTENTS

                                                                Page

ABSTRACT                                                         ill

RECOMMENDATIONS                                                    1

PART I  - INTRODUCTION
    Scope of Investigation                                         3
    Project Objectives                                             3
    Project Description                                            4

PART II - JURISDICTIONAL FRAMEWORK
  -«• Authority                                                      7
    Water Quality Standards                                        7
    Site and Mineral Right Acquisition                             8
    Funding Authority                                              8
    Prevention of Future Pollution                                 8

PART III - INVENTORY AND FORECAST
    Physical  Conditions                                            9
    Water Resources                                                9
    Social and Economic Environment                               23

PART IV - PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING FEATURES
    Abatement Project Description                                 27
    Coal Refuse Disposal                                          27
    Mine Sealing Program Alternatives                             29
    Core Boring Program                                           30
    Phase 1 - Mine Sealing Program                                32
    Phase 2 - Mine Sealing Program                                38
    Vents                                                         40
    Phase 3 - Mine Sealing                                        42
    Cost Estimates                                                43
    Cost Comparison                                               46
    Program Surveillance                                          47
    Emergency Procedures                                          48

PART V - PROJECT EFFECTIVENESS
    Water Quality Improvements                                    49
    Other Demonstration Values                                    50
    Benefits                                                      50

PART VI - IMPLEMENTATION AND OPERATION
    Project Responsibility                                        53
    Program Schedule                                              53

APPENDIX A - Lake Hope  Base Line Water Quality                    55
               (Data Updated)

-------
                              FIGURES
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure 13
Figure 14
Figure 15
 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
12 -
Lake Hope Drainage Basin
Mine Openings
Geological and Mining Features
Gas, Oil and Water Well Locations
Sampling Points
Acid Versus Flow, Sample Point 547
Lake Hope State Park Facilities
Core Borings at Mine Opening 47
Phase 1, Mine Sealing Map
Preferred Mine Seal
Alternate Mine Seal
Isometric Drawing of Mine Seal
Permeable Mine Seal
Cross-Section and Water Elevations
Program Schedule
10
11
14
16
18
22
2k
31
3k
36
37
39
41
42
54
                              TABLES

Table 1  - Mine Opening Identification
Table 2 - Sample Points
Table 3 - Flow Duration Data
Table 4 - USGS Water Quality Summary
          Stations 310, 320, and 420
Table 5 ~ Program Cost Estimate
Table 6 - Phase III Cost Estimate
                                                          12
                                                          17
                                                          19

                                                          20
                                                          44
                                                          47
                                     vi

-------
                                RECOMMENDATIONS
A multi-phase mine drainage demonstration project is recommended for the Lake
Hope watershed in Vinton County, Ohio.  To demonstrate effective procedures for
reducing mine drainage pollution of Lake Hope, removal and/or covering of coal
refuse which was scattered throughout the area during active mining operations
is recommended.  Mine sealing is also recommended, beginning with Mine Openings
40 through 52 in Mine Complex kj.   Subsequent sealing will encompass all re-
maining openings in Mine Complex 47.  Additional mine seals will be constructed
in the Mine 88 Complex as warranted to demonstrate complete control of mine
drainage and as available funds permit.

-------
                      PART I  - INTRODUCTION

Scope of Investigation

This report is a presentation of an evaluation of the feasibility of
demonstrating refuse pile disposal and mine sealing  in the Lake Hope
area in Vinton County, Ohio.   The specific scope of  the  investigations
is as follows:

     I.  Review the history of mining, mine drainage problems, and
         mine drainage abatement measures in the study area.

     2.  Assess the jurisdictional framework through which a mine
         drainage abatement project may be carried out.

     3.  Inventory local physical features, hydrology, water quality,
         social and environmental factors, and other elements  in-
         fluencing the value of mine drainage demonstration projects
         in the study area.

     k.  Develop preliminary engineering features of a workable mine
         drainage abatement program in sufficient detail to permit
         evaluation of the feasibility of the proposed project.

     5.  Estimate the effectiveness of the project and delineate
         possible beneficial uses for the reconstructed  area upon
         completion of the mine drainage abatement improvements.

     6.  Determine tangible and intangible benefits  of the recommended
         program.

     7.  Develop an outline of scheduling and budgeting  to assure ade-
         quate administrative control of the proposed project.

     8.  Recommend a continuing program for surveillance of mine
         drainage from the improved area.  Delineate means for measur-
         ing  the accomplishments of the demonstration program with
         respect to presently envisioned objectives.

Project Objectives

The study area, which is the subject of this mine drainage abatement
feasibility investigation, is located in Vinton County,  Ohio,  in the
watershed above Lake Hope.  Acidic waters draining from  the study area
have restricted recreational activities at Lake Hope State Park and
caused several fish kills  in the  lake.  Fish reproduction  in Lake Hope
is severely inhibited and as a result, the lake attracts few fishermen.

Two major objectives of the mine drainage demonstration  program analyzed
herein are:

-------
     1.  Demonstrate effective techniques of bulkhead sealing of under-
         ground mines to prevent the formation and discharge of acid
         mine drainage and to permit ultimate utilization of the study
         area in a manner which will create a measurable public benefit.

     2.  Demonstrate methods for reduction of mine drainage pollution
         from coal refuse piles through burial and/or removal.

Project Description

The Lake Hope site has been mined by both surface and drift mining
techniques with the latter greatly predominating.  The proposed mine
drainage abatement project will demonstrate means for alleviating
problems related to previous drift mining activities.  Acid contri-
bution from the strip mined area is inconsequential.   The proposed
project includes three parts as follows:

     1.  Base Line Water Quality - The initial effort which has al-
         ready been undertaken by the Ohio Department of Natural
         Resources involves establishment of a monitoring system for
         surveillance of water quality in Sandy Run and tributaries,
         discharges from mine openings, and surface runoff.  The data
         collected is presented in a report entitled  "Base Line Water
         Quality," which is included in its entirety  as Appendix A and
         summarized in "Part III - Inventory and Forecast."  The complete
         water quality studies provide the standards  against which
         the success of the entire program will be measured.

         Two new gaging and monitoring stations have  been constructed
         and the existing USGS flow gaging station has been improved to
         permit monitoring of several parameters of water quality.
         Mine discharge records for a period of over  one year are
         available and included in the base line report in Appendix A.

         Following construction and clean-up of all phases of the
         pollution abatement demonstration project, a minimum of two
         years of monitoring of the water quality will be performed
         to determine the effectiveness of the techniques.

     2.  Coal Refuse Disposal - The first phase of physical improve-
         ment in the demonstration project involves the removal and/or
         covering of refuse remaining from the period of active mining
         in the region.  In addition to being unsightly, these areas
         of refuse are continuously leached by surface water  runoff
         and are a source of acid contribution to the streams.  This
         phase has already been completed by the Division of  Forestry
         and Reclamation of the Ohio Department of Natural  Resources
         and is discussed in detail in "Part  IV - Preliminary Engineer-
         ing Features."  Many refuse piles have been  removed  and buried
         in suitably prepared sites outside the drainage area.  Refuse
         accumulations in Honeycomb Hollow and several other  locations

-------
have been buried in place.  Surface grading, liming, fertiliza-
tion, and seeding have followed the removal or burial of refuse.
General aesthetics are vastly improved as a result of this
phase of the program; water quality data following completion
of the refuse removal is not adequate at this time to fully
define the long-term improvement to streams and Lake Hope.

Mine Seal ing - There are currently over 100 mine openings in
a small area in the upper reaches of the Lake Hope watershed.
A multi-phase program will be undertaken to demonstrate the
effectiveness of mine sealing in eliminating detrimental
affects of mine drainage on water quality.  A non-draining or
bulkhead type of mine seal will be utilized and is detailed,
along with several alternatives, in "Part IV - Preliminary
Engineering Features."  Through a continuous water quality
monitoring program, the effects of the mine sealing program
will be evaluated.

-------
                    PART  II - JURISDICTION  FRAMEWORK

Authority

The State of Ohio Department of Natural Resources,  through  the  Director,
pursuant to Sections 1501.01; 1501.011; 1501.02; and  1501.021 of  the
Ohio Revised Code may enter into cooperative  or contractual arrangements
with the Unfted States or any agent or department  thereof for the ac-
complishment of the purposes for which the department was created.
Senate Bill No. 13  (19^*9) created the Department of Natural Resources
". . . to formulate and put into execution a  long-term comprehensive
plan and program for the development and wide use  of  the natural  re-
sources of the state to the end that health,  happiness, and wholesome
enjoyment of life of the people of Ohio may be further encouraged;
that increased recreational opportunities and advantages be made
available to the people of Ohio and visitors, that  industry, agri-
culture, employment, investment and other economic  interests may  be
assisted and encouraged.  . . ."  Legal authority is also granted  to
obtain land and water and mineral rights by purchase, negotiation
of easements, condemnation, leases and other  control  techniques.

Water Quality Standards

Lake Hope  is in the Raccoon Creek Watershed,  which  is in turn directly
tributary to the Ohio River.  No water quality standards have as yet
been specifically set for this stream.  The minimum conditions  for all
waters at all places and at all times are applicable, however.  These
conditions state that the water shall be:

      1.  Free of substances attributable to municipal, industrial or
         other discharges, or agricultural practices  that will  settle
         to form putrescent or otherwise objectional  sludge deposits.

     2.  Free from  floating debris, oil, skum and  other floating mater-
         ials attributable to municipal, industrial or other discharges,
         or agricultural practices in amounts sufficient to be  unsightly
         or deleterious.

     3.  Free from  materials attributable to  municipal, industrial or
         other discharges, or agricultural practices  producing  color,
         odor or other conditions in such degree as to create a nuisance.

     k.  Free from  substances attributable to municipal, industrial or
         other discharges, or agricultural practices  in concentrations
         of combinations which are toxic or harmful to human, animal,
         plant or aquatic life.

Virtually the entire length of Racoon Creek is affected by  acid mine
drainage.  Water quality standards adopted for the  Hocking  River  Basin
make special provision for those streams polluted  by  acid mine  drain-
age.  These provisions are generally applicable to  Raccoon  Creek  and
tributaries also.   The Hocking River Standards state  that the Water

-------
Pollution Control Board and the Ohio Department of Health will en-
courage and assist other agencies such as the Ohio Department of
Natural Resources and the U. S. Department of Interior  in the develop-
ment and implementation of programs for area-wide control of acid
mine drainage from abandoned underground and pre-reclammation law
strip coal  mines.

Site and Mineral  Right Acquisition

The State of Ohio has acquired virtually all property and mineral rights
directly involved in drainage to Lake Hope.  A few minor parcels will
shortly be acquired so that no mining activities will be permitted with-
in the project drainage area.

Funding Authority

Authority for the original funding of the Lake Hope project is contained
in the appropriations H. B. No. 828 enacted by the 108th Ohio General
Assembly,

Prevention of Future Pollution

When all anticipated land and mineral right acquisitions are completed,
the State of Ohio will be able to exert full control over the watershed.
This will assure that the project area will not~ be adversely affected
by the influx of acid or other mine water pollution from nearby sources
or from future mining operations.

A continuous program of monitoring water quality and maintenance of
mine drainage control facilities will further safeguard the integrity
of the water in the streams tributary to Lake Hope.

-------
                PART III -  INVENTORY AND  FORECAST

Physical Conditions

The Lake Hope project  is located  in Brown Township,  Vinton  County,  Ohio,
approximately 20 miles west of Athens, Ohio.   The  site'is within  the
22,569-acre Zaleski State Forest.

Figure  1 is a base map  illustrating many  of  the  significant physical
features of the study  area.  This map has been prepared  from U. S.
Geological Survey 7 1/2 minute topographic maps  and  supplemented  with
information from other sources.

The boundary of the watershed tributary  to Lake  Hope is  shown in  Figure  1
The main stream draining  into Lake Hope  is Sandy Run,  which is  in turn
fed by  many tributaries reaching  back up  into  small  valleys.   The outlet
from Lake Hope is  into Raccoon Creek, which  is a major tributary  of the
Ohio River.

As  illustrated by  the  contour  lines  in  Figure  1, the entire watershed
is  quite rugged.   The  stream channels have formed  deeply incised  valleys
into the terrain.  The area  is almost entirely forested  and serves  as
a  major open space recreational outlet  for residents of  Ohio and  near-
by  states.

Lake Hope was constructed during  1938-1939 and filled with  water  during
the spring of 1939-  The  total drainage  area tributary to the lake is
approximately 10 square miles.  About  120 acres  of water surface  are
provided.  The  lake  is relatively shallow with the total storage  volume
at the  time of construction estimated at  approximately 1,500 acre-feet.
This volume has been  reduced somewhat by  siltat ion.

Mining  History - Coal  is  the only mineral  resource that has been  exten-
sively  exploited  in  the study  area.   Coal  mining was initiated in the
vicinity over 100  years ago.  Activity  was greatly accelerated during
World War  II but has  rapidly declined  in recent years.  The State of
Ohio has  acquired  virtually all of the  land  tributary to Lake Hope and
 is in the  final negotiation stage for  the remaining parcels.  Few blocks
of coal remain which  could  be  economically mined and with the land in
state ownership there  will  be  no  further mining in the watershed.

Mining  has  largely been accomplished  by drifting horizontal tunnels
back  into  the Middle  Kittanning  (No.  6)  coal seam from the outcrop
which  is  at or  slightly above  the valley floor.  A total of 107 mine
openings  have been catalogued  and locations  are shown in Figure 2.
Presented  in Table 1  are  the names of  mine operations associated with
the various mine openings.   Consecutive identification numbers have
been established  purely for convenience and  bear no relationship to the
actual  recorded number of the  mine.   The identification numbers  as
 listed  have  been  used  throughout  the balance of this  report.  The  tabu-
 lation  of  names  is not complete but represents  an accumulation of

-------
                                   IN FEET
FIGURE 1   - LAKE  HOPE  DRAINAGE BASIN
                    10

-------
SCALE  IN FEET
MINE  OPENING
DISCHARGING MINE OPENING
MINE  OPENING NUMBER
COAL  REFUSE
SAMPLING STATION
            FIGURE 2  - MINE  OPENINGS
                        11

-------
                                  TABLE 1

                        MINE OPENING IDENTIFICATION
 Mine                                     Mine
Opening            Name                  Opening

 1           George McDaniels            39

 2           Ownership Not Available     40-47

 3           Dewey McDaniels             48-50

 4-6         Jay McDaniels               51-57

 7           Taylor                      58-59

 8-9         Dude McDaniels              60-62

10-11        Taylor                      63

12-13        Harkless                    64

14-17        Lowery                      65~75

18           Ownership Not Available     76-77

19-21        Loper                       78

22-23        Prater                      79-90

24-25        Ownership Not Available     91-92

26           Loper No. 2                 93~97

27           Ownership Not Available     98-99

28           Loper No. 1                 100-102

29-30        Loper No. 2                103

31           Largent                    104

32-33        Todd                       105

34-38        Ownership Not Available    106-107
      Name

Largent

Hope Hoi low

Ownership Not Available

John Fuller

Ownership Not Available

Ralph Fuller

Ownership Not Available

Jackson

Ownership Not Available

Hull

Ownership Not Available

Loper No. 3

Powers

Largent No. 2

Largent

Hulley

Bray

Ownership Not Available

Hulley

Largent
                                     12

-------
 readily  available information.   Indicated openings are not all working
 shafts,  but  include ventilation holes as well.  It is probable that
 there  are  additional  openings not catalogued which have sloughed in,
 have been  bulldozed shut,  or are obscured by vegetative cover.   *

 •Interconnections  exist between  most of the mines which have been
 worked into  the  same block of coal.  Available mine maps are generally
 inadequate to establish extent  and exact locations of interconnections.
 However,  the maps do indicate the possibility of interconnections and
 discussions  with  previous  mine  operators indicate^general agreement
 with the fact that the hill has been completely honeycombed by the
 various,mine operations.    Based on extant mine maps, the approximate
 mined-out  areas  are shown  in Figure 3.  The apparent interconnection of
 mines  defines two large mined areas identified as Mine kj Complex and
 Mine 88  Complex.   Several  smaller mined areas are seen to be indepen-
 dent of  the  major complexes.
 a
 There  was  a  small strip mine operation in the south half of the south-
 west quarter of  Section 12 as shown in Figure 2.  The mine, which dis-
 turbed less  than  20 acres  in total, is abandoned and the area is now
 owned  by the State of Ohio.  Reclamation of this area is not included
 in the proposed  demonstration project.

 Areas  in which coal refuse was  deposited during active mining operations
 are also identified in Figure 2.  These have been largely covered or
 removed  as the first phase of the mine drainage abatement demonstration
 program.
f
 r -=•
 Geologic Considerations -  The mining throughout the study area has
 been exclusively  of the Middle  Kittanning (No. 6) coal seam.  The
 overburden above the No.  6 seam is generally massive sandstone with
 some fracturing  evident.  In this location, this vein of coal is approxi-
 mately k2 inches  in thickness.   Lower Kittanning (No. 5) coal is also
 present  in the Lake Hope vicinity, but because of the relative thinness
 of the seam  and  since it is 25  to 30 feet below the Middle Kittanning,
 which  would  necessitate a  more  costly mining procedure, this resource
 has not  been commercially  developed.

 The outcrop  of the Middle  Kittanning coal seam  is shown in the Figure
 3 topographic map.  Also shown  in Figure 3 is the structure contour
 drawn  on the Middle Kittanning  coal as developed from generalized
..information  and  old mine maps.  The coal dips  in the general direction
 of a line south  67 degrees east atong which the average inclination is
 33 feet  per  mile.

 No'coal  drill records are  available for the immediate study area.
 Several  test borings were  conducted as part of the feasibi1ity in-
 vestigation  and  the results obtained are presented in "Part  IV -
 Preliminary  Engineering Features" of this report.

 There  are no known geological faults in the study area.  A search of
 the terrain  over the mined-out  areas does not reveal any  indication
 of surface subsidence as a result of the underground mining  activities.
                                 13

-------
                                                                         in
                             STRUCTURE CONTOUR
                             MIDDLE KITTANNING
                                APPROXIMATE OUTCROP OF MIDDLE KITTANING COAL
                            &ft GENERALIZED MINED-OUT AREA OF MIDDLE KITTANNING
                                COAL
^820-
          FIGURE 3  - GEOLOGICAL AND MINING FEATURES

-------
Gas, Oil and Water Wells - Oil and gas  resources may be  present  al-
though data on these minerals  is "too sparse  to evaluate.  A survey
by the Division of Oil and Gas of the Ohio Department of Natural
Resources reports only three wells in the project watershed.  These
are described below and shown  in Figure k.

     Permit No. 9-A          Total depth 3,184 feet.
                             Plugged and abandoned October  13,  1914-

     Permit No. 33^-A        No  record  of well ever having  been
                             drilled.   Permission to drill was
                             given December  3, 1923-

     Permit No. 335-A        Total depth 3,310 feet.
                             Plugged and abandoned October  15,  1928.

Since none of the oil and gas  wells are active,  they will have  no
effect on the proposed mine drainage demonstration project.  With
the control of mineral rights  residing with  the  State of Ohio,
future development of gas and  oil resources  will also be controlled.

The water wells on file at the Division of Water of the  Ohio Depart-
ment of  Natural Resources are  also shown in  Figure k.  Depth and
yields are  indicated  for each  well.  All wells are on property
owned by the State of Ohio and are largely used  for water supply
to  recreational facilities.  The wells  are all downstream of the
mined area where  the  demonstration project wi1?  be undertaken and
therefore will not influence the proposed project.

Adequacy of Existing  Information - Available physical information  is
generally adequate for evaluation of the proposed mine drainage
feasibility project.  More definitive  information on the extent of mine
interconnections, the depth of coal remaining between mine workings
and the  outcrop,  and  more extensive soil boring  information would  be
helpful.   It  is possible, however, to  proceed with the feasibility
analysis based on available  information, recognizing that additional
physical details  will have to  be assembled at the time final construc-
tion  plans and specifications  are developed  for  the proposed demon-
stration facilities.

Water Resources

Base  line water resource data  is available for streams  in the study
area.  Flow and quality characteristics of drainage from the mine
openings which are the major sources of acid discharge have also
been  investigated extensively.   A complete summary of water quality
and flow data  is  presented in  a  report  entitled  "Base Line  Water
Quality" prepared for the Ohio Department of Natural Resources  and
dated October  14, 1971.  Appendix A  is  a complete reproduction  of
this  report including an updated computer printout of the water quality
                                 15

-------
   LEGEND





•  WATER WELLS




•  GAS AND OIL WELLS





   DEPTH
                                rsi
                                                  FEET
      FIGURE 4 - GAS,  OIL AND  WATER WELL  LOCATIONS
                                 16

-------
analytical results.  Figure 5 presents the
stations utilized and Table 2 contains the
sample points with the Appendix A data.

                             TABLE  2

                          SAMPLE POINTS
  locations of sampling
  key for coordination of
           Station No.

             200-299

             300-399

             400-499

             500-699
    Location
             700-799
             800-899
Lake Hope

Sandy Run

Big Four Creek

Mine Openings (by
addition of 500 to
Mine Opening No. -
Figure 2)

Smal1  Streams and
Drainage Tributary to
Sandy Run

Small  Streams and
Drainage Tributary to
Big Four Creek
 Stream Records - A U. S.  Geological Survey stream gaging station
 (No. 310  in Figure 5) has been  in operation since October, 1957-
 Table 3 presents  long-term  flow  duration data for Sandy Run as taken from
 Bulletin  42 "Flow Duration  of Ohio  Streams,"  1968, Ohio Department of
 Natural Resources, Division of Water,  Columbus, Ohio.  Records from
 this station  reveal annual  runoff from the 4.99 square mile drainage
 area averaging 16.84  inches.  This  represents an average discharge of
 6.19 cubic feet per second  (cfs).   There are  periods each year during
 which there is no flow  in the stream past the gaging station.  The
 maximum recorded discharge  at this  location is 3,770 cfs on August 3,
 1958.

 Two new gaging stations,  320 on  Sandy  Run (drainage area 0,98
 square mile)  and 420 on Big Four Creek (drainage area  1.01 square
 mile), were established in  October,  1970, for the specific purpose
 of gathering  base line hydrologic and  water quality data for the
 proposed  mine drainage abatement demonstration project.  All three
 gaging stations have been provided  with analytical and recording
 equipment to  monitor flow,  temperature, pH and conductivity.
 Station 310 also contains equipment for continuously measuring
 dissolved oxygen concentrations.
                                 17

-------
/ " J'/^S ,-Jt °   <•: ' r^t&fr'
s  \  ' £- ^ . v    -v- -1  • r. f^s.r:>>^s.
                        NOTE:   SAMPLING POINT NUMBER FOR

                               MINES  IS OBTAINED  BY

                               ADDING 500 TO MINE OPENING

                               NUMBERS.
             SCALE  IN FEET




   FIGURE  5  - SAMPLING POINTS
                       18

-------
                            TABLE 3

                           SANDY RUN
                      FLOW DURATION DATA
  Percent  of  Time
 Discharge Equalled         	Discharge
    or  Exceeded	
     *' '$.•
         10

         20

         30

         40

         50

         60

         70

         80

         90

 In addition to the summary presented in the Base Line Water Quality
 Report, U. S. Geological Survey cooperatively with the State of Ohio
 is continuing to collect samples at Sampling Points £10, 320, and 420
 at two week intervals for analysis of the following characteristics:

     I ron
     Manganese
     Dissolved Solids (residue on evaporation at 180° C)
     Total Hardness
     Acidity (to pH 8.3)
     Sulfate
     Specific Conductance
     pH
     Flow

Table 4 is a summary presentation of the water quality data collected
 to date by the Geological Survey.  A more detailed summarization of
 the most significant parameters is included in the Appendix A report.
The Geological Survey sampling and analysis program will continue dur-
 ing the duration of the demonstration project.  Throughout the monitor-
 ing period reports of the Geological Survey water quality  investiga-
 tions will be made available to the Environmental Protection Agency
and other parties to the program every  two weeks.  Data_from the con-
tinuous monitoring equipment will be reported and distributed on a
monthly basis.
gjpjn
6,284
3,142
1,795
943
584
332
220
144
45
cfs
14.00
7.00
4.00
2.10
1.30
0.74
0.49
0.32
0.10
cf s/Sq. Mi .
2.810
1.400
0.802
0.421
0.261
0.148
0.098
0.064 •
0.020

-------
                                  TABLE 4

                        USGS WATER QUALITY SUMMARY

                        STATIONS 310, 320, AND 420
                                 Maximum
                                           Min imum
Average
Sampling Station 310

    Dissolved Solids, mg/1
    Hardness, mg/1
    Acidity, mg/1
    Iron, mg/1
    Manganese, mg/1
    Sulphate, mg/1
    pH
    Conductivity,  micromhos
      at 25° C
    Temperature, F
    Flow, gpm
Sampling Station 320
                      mg/1
Dissolved Sol ids
Hardness, mg/1
Acidity, mg/1
Iron, mg/1
Manganese, mg/1
Sulphate, mg/1
pH
Conductivity, micromhos
  at 25° C
Temperature, F
Flow, gpm
Sampling Station 420
                      mg/1
Dissolved Sol ids
Hardness, mg/1
Acidity, mg/1
Iron, mg/1
Manganese, mg/1
Sulphate, mg/1
pH
Conductivity, micromhos
  at 25° C
Temperature, F
Flow, gpm
960
470
228
33-0
11.0
655
4-7
1,210
73
27,825
2,600
1,100
794
120.0
12.0
1,872
4.6
2,930
74
4,488
1,630
620
596
87-0
17-0
1,144
4.3
2,100
77
5,655
93
51
5
0.6
0.12
57
3-4
182
33
22
127
70
15
1.8
0.43
94
2.8
256
33
18
110
64
5
1.6
0.65
80
2.8
226
33
4
375
182
81
4.3
3.10
256

616
55
3,275
1,142
409
320
46.7
4.87
816

1,599
55
256
755
278
222
25-8
6.63
524

1,136
57
621
                                     20

-------
Lake Samp 1ing - Water quality characteristics  for  Lake  Hope  proper
show considerable variation.  During  the period  between April,  1970,
and June, 1971, as reported  in the Base Line Water Quality Study,
pH was seen to vary between  3.9 and 7.8.  Acidity  (to pH  8.3)
ranged from a high of 100 mg/1 down to  less than 20.  The majority
of the samples collected, however, exhibited pH  between 4-0  and
5.0 and total acidity between 20 and  30 mg/1.

In addition to the water quality samples, an analysis was made of
the bottom muds in Lake Hope.  These  data are  reported  in Appendix A.
On the basis of evaluation of both water and bottom mud characteristics,
it was concluded that while  some resistant species of fish can survive
in water of low pH for long  periods,  tolerance and reproductive  capa-
bility of desirable species  are severely limited.  The  low pH also has
a detrimental effect on the  entire biota as it affects  the complete
food chain of the ecosystems.

Mine Drainage - Direct discharge from mine openings was found to
be the most significant source of acid  contribution to  the streams
above Lake Hope.  Two mine openings consistently produce  the greatest
flow rate, highest acid concentration,  and therefore the  greatest
acid load.

Mine Opening 47 is at the  lowest elevation of  all  the openings  into the
hill west of Sandy Run and north of Big Four Hollow.  As  a result,
all mine drainage generated  in this major mine complex  is'dis-
charged to Sandy Run through Opening  47.  Over the period of record
from April,  1970, through June, 1971> drainage discharge  averaged
120 gallons per minute (gpm) with an  average acid  load  entering
Sandy Run of 1,465 pounds per day.  A high flow  of 341  gpm  was  recorded
from this mine opening on May 8, 1971, with a  corresponding  acid load
of 4,665 pounds per day.  A  low flow  of 27.5 gpm was recorded on two
separate occasions with corresponding acid loads of 379 and  388  pounds
per day=

The other major mine discharge is from  Mine Opening 88  which drains the
complex of mine workings driven into  the coal  seam below  Starrett
Ridge southwest of Big Four  Hollow.   The recorded  high  flow  from      t
Mine Opening 88 was 265 gpm  on May 5,  1971-  The acid flow rate  at that
time was 5,374 pounds per day.  The observed low flow condition
from M'ine Opening 88 was  12  gpm with  a  corresponding acid  load of 281
pound's per day.  Average conditions for this mine  opening  include
a yield of 70 gpm and an acid load discharged  to Big Four Creek
of 1,029 pounds per day.

Figure 6 is a graph of acid  flow in pounds per day versus water
flow rate in gallons per minute for discharge  from Mine Opening  47  into
Sandy Run.  Similar graphs are available for other sampling  points  in
Appendix A.  This plot indicates a general  relationship between  dis-
charge and the amount of acid emitting  from the  mine opening.   Water
volume is quite dependent upon meteor log!cal conditions.  Therefore,
the quality of water discharging from the mine and also flowing  in
                                 21

-------
Sandy Run is more specifically dependent upon precipitation patterns
than on purely seasonal conditions.  High acid flow may occur at any
season of the year if the precipitation pattern is conducive to such
discharge.
       ACID
  1000 IBS PER DAY
                         ®
                                EE
                                        ©
                                                              ACID
                                                          1000 IBS PER DAY
                         100
200

FLOW, GPM
                                             300
                   FIGURE  6  -
                                ACID  VS  FLOW
                                SAMPLE POINT  547
The total acid discharge from the various mine openings generally
exceeds the total as measured in Sandy Run at Station 310.  This
indicates that, on balance, natural stream flow from all sources
except mine drainage contains enough alkalinity to neutralize a
portion of the acidity.  Laboratory testing was undertaken to verify
the impact of natural drainage upon acidic discharge from mine open-
ings.   Reults of these investigations are reported in the Appendix A
report.  Because of the natural  alkalinity of the area water, it  is
not necessary to eliminate all acid production in the various mines
in order to achieve a marked  improvement in water quality in Lake
Hope.   Expected improvements  in water quality for specific mine
drainage abatement projects are discussed in "Part IV - Preliminary
Engineering Features.1'
                     "
                                     22

-------
Precipltat ion - Records of precipitation were  maintained  and  cor-
related with other water volume and quality  measurements  during
the base line investigations.   In  addition,  maximum  expected  rain-
fall rates have been determined from  the U.  S.  Department of
Commerce Weather Bureau Technical  Paper No.  kO "Rainfall  Frequency
Atlas of the United States."   This publication indicates  that the
maximum one hour rainfall  that might  be expected  yearly at Lake
Hope would produce slightly over one  inch  of precipitation.   The
maximum one hour storm with a  return  frequency of 10 years would
produce about 1.9  inches of rainfall.  Average rainfall  in the Lake
Hope vicinity is approximately 36  inches per year.

Social and Economic Environment

Lake Hope State Park  (see  Figure 7),  with  Lake Hope  as  a  focal point,
is  located deep within the 22,569-acre Zaleski  State Forest.   The
Ohio Department of Natural Resources,  through  a development program
dating to the early 1930's, has continually  added to the  park facili-
ties and extensive recreational opportunities  are now available  in
the area.  An attractive dining  lodge and  numerous  cabins provide
basic  visitor accomodations.   Recreational pursuits  that  are  readily
accessible  include hiking, horseback  riding, boating, swimming and
camping.

The state park  proper encompasses  3,103  acres, including  the  120-
 acre  lake.  The dining  lodge,  69  cabins  and 223 family campsites,
 marina facilities, beach  and  trails make this one of Ohio's com-
 prehensive  facilities.   Developed  park area supplemented  by over
 22,500 acres  of forest  land  results in a very versatile recreation
 resource.

 A 1970 travel  survey  indicates Lake Hope  to be among the top areas
 in attracting visitors  from all  over the state.  Visitors were re-
 ported from 64  of  the 88 Ohio counties.    Franklin County  (Columbus)
 surpassed  all  other  counties  by three-fold  in representation.
 Lake  Hope  is  78 miles from Columbus.   Park attendance for 1970 was
 658,938  visitors.

 Problem and Causes -  Access to easily minable coal made  this area
 attractive  over 100  years ago.  Even now,  old stone  iron  smelting
 furnaces  remain as monuments   to the industrial history and add to
 the heritage  of the  region.

 Acid  draining into Lake Hope  has   adverse  affect on the extensive
 water-oriented  recreation which centers on  the lake.  The  low pH
 of the water  adversely  affects fishing, since fish reproduction is
 severely  inhibited at the pH   levels commonly experienced.  Fish
 kills  have  been reported in the past when excessive  slugs of
 acid  reached  the  lake.
                                 23

-------
         2000  ^000   6000
                 J	I
         SCALE  IN FEET
                                            HABRON HOLLOW	.
                                            HIKING TRAIL"^" R£D OAK
                                            I 1/2 MILES/  TRAIL
                                                  / 1/2 MILEv
                             GROUSE POINT
                             PICNIC AREA
                           m!!ic/  <^LTER HOUSED  f\
                  / VACATION '•./....
                  ' CABINS*-.'.'./..-1
                                                             USGS GAGING
                                                             STATIOH (3IO;
                                                                   TO LOGAK 25 MILES
                                                                 HARMRGER
                                                               '  HOLLO* TRAIL
                                                                 2 MILES
  TO ZALESK
  » MILES
        NATURE I  LBIKKEYE TRAIL
        CENTER-1   1/2 MILE
                                                         KING HOLLOW
                                                         TRAIL ROAD
                                                       TO BEAR HOLLOW TRAIL
                                                       AND MOONVILLE
           FIGURE 1  -  LAKE  HOPE  STATE  PARK FACILITIES
Attendance figures show  that only 5,398  (one percent) of  the park
visitors  in  1970 came to  Lake Hope to fish.
for fishermen utilizing state park lakes
cent of  the  total attendance.   This lack of  fishermen
has subsequent affects on  camping and cabin  revenues,
other expenditures in the  locale.
                                                The state-wide  average
                                            is  approximately  10 per-
                                                          in  this area
                                                          and  related
Recreation  Needs - The  centra]  region of  Ohio is already  heavily
populated and shows strong  growth tendencies.   Lake Hope  State
Park  lies within the area strongly influenced by the central
region.  Water areas suitable for fishing,  general boating,  and
small craft are one of  the  severe shortages.   The central  region
needs 8,000 more acres  of water to satisfy  current demands,  and
by 1985  almost 34,000 acres  (not now existing)  will be  required.
Current  shortage of shore  line for sport  fishing activities  is
740 acres,  by 1985 the  shortage will be  1,094 acres unless  new
resources are developed.  The shoreline  acreages for sport  fishing
are based on a 20-foot  depth  requirement.
                                       24

-------
Space needed for picnicing, camping, hiking, and other land based
activities is over 7,000 acres today, and will reach 12,000 acres
by 1985.  Presence of water greatly enhances this land for the
activities described.
                                 25

-------
           PART IV - PRELIMINARY  ENGINEERING  FEATURES
Abatement Project Description

Mine drainage problems  in  the  Lake Hope  area  are  typical of  those en-
countered as a result of mining  for  coal.   Iron pyrite  found  in  the
overburden and material adjacent to  the  coal  seam, when exposed  to
water and air, is oxidized  to  form sulfuric acid  and  acidic  iron salts.
Once formed  in the old  mine workings,  the  acid may be retained for a
period but ultimately drains  into Lake Hope with  a detrimental impact
on this prime recreational  facility.

A multi-phase mine drainage demonstration  project is  proposed.   Efforts
already undertaken have established  a  water quality  base line (Appendix
A) which can be utilized  to measure  demonstration project  effectiveness.
Physical improvements to  demonstrate means for reducing mine  drainage
pollution involve the following:

     1.  Removal or  burying of random  areas of coal  refuse remaining from
         active mining  operations.

     2.  A mine sealing program to  inundate the old  mine workings and  in4
         hibit acid  formation and discharge into  Sandy  Run.

Coal Refuse  Disposal

At the termination of active  mining  in the Lake Hope  watershed,  an esti-
mated  100,000 cubic  yards  of  coal refuse was  randomly scattered  near
mine openings and adjacent to the area streams.   These  refuse piles
detracted from the aesthetics  of the area  and were a  source  of acid
contribution as a result  of leaching of  surface water.

Two alternatives were considered for improving  the appearance of the
area and eliminating acid production from  the coal  refuse.

     1.  Physically  remove the refuse  and  bury outside  the project
         watershed.  This  alternative  would  completely  eliminate the
         objectionable  material  from the demonstration  area;  therefore,
         there would be no potential for future contamination of Sandy
         Run or Lake Hope as  a result  of surface  water leaching.
          Consolidate tne coal  refuse into several  locations  and provide
          a  soil  cover prior to seeding the area.   This alternative is
2.
        » *          -
                 pri
    the more economical of  the  two for  the  large accumulations of
    refuse.
 Upon  considering the advantages and disadvantages of these two alterna-
 tives,  a  course of action utilizing both approaches was initiated.  The
 Division  of  Forestry and Reclamation of the Ohio Department of Natural
 Resources undertook this project.  Approximately 17»000 cubic yards of
                                 27

-------
refuse were loaded onto dump trucks and hauled about 3 miles to disposal
sites outside the Lake Hope watershed.  The refuse was buried in a  loca-
tion and a manner which would not create any adverse effects on the en-
vironment.

The majority of the coal refuse in Honeycomb Hollow and at several other
locations was buried in place.  A total of 13-7 acres of refuse pile sites
haVe been prepared and planted in accordance with the following program.

     1.   Areas with pH below 4.5 =

          a.  Scarify top 5 to 6 inches.

          b.  Spread lime screenings at 5 tons per acre.

          c.  Spread 6 to 8 inches of soil top dressing.

     2.   Areas with pH above 4.5'

          a.  Scarify if required.

          b.  Spread lime screenings at 3 to 5 tons per acres.

          c.  Disc 1ime into soi1.

     3.   Apply the following mixture as a slurry with a hydroseeder:

          a.  Agricultural  limestone at 2 tons per acre.

          b.  Fertilizer (12-12-12), at 600 pounds per acre.

          c.  Seed mixture at 36 pounds per acre containing 14 pounds
              Kentucky 31  Fescue,  12 pounds Sericia lespedeza and 10
              pounds orchard grass.

          d.  Mulch at 1,500 pounds per acre.

          e.  Water as necessary to maintain proper suspension.

     4.   During the spring following germination of the seeded mixture,
          plant one year seedlings of European black alder, sweet gum,
          and sycamore at the rate of 700 trees per acre.

The revegetation program appears to be a success and the general aes-
thetics of the area are much improved.  Some increase in acid produc-
tion was expected and observed in the initial flush following the re-
fuse removal and replanting activities.  The water quality record to
date is not sufficient to judge the magnitude of the long-term decrease
in acid production from the replanted areas.

As the refuse piles in Honeycomb Hollow were being buried, Division of
Forestry and Reclamation personnel noted that drainage from this small

                                     28

-------
watershed was entering a subsidence  near  Mine  Opening  62  and  exiting
through Mine Opening 60.  .This  subsidence was  plugged  with  locally
available material and surface  drainage was  diverted away from  the
opening.  At present there  is no  drainage from Mine Openings  60 or
61 and these mines are flooded  to an  elevation above the  coal seam.
This treatment has effectively  eliminated a  source of  acid  production.
The quantity of acid produced  in  this  mine complex averaged  139 pounds
per day (51,000 pounds per  year)  over  the period %f record  prior to the
remedial work.  Elimination of  this  quantity of acid will undoubtedly
improve water quality conditions  in  Sandy Run.  A decrease  of approxi-
mately k mg/1 of  total acidity  is expected with a corresponding pH in-
crease of 0.1 unit.  However, sufficient  analytical data  has  not been
accumulated following completion  of  the work to statistically verify
the long-term impact on water quality.

Mine Sealing Program Alternatives

To assure fiscal  control of the mine  sealing project within available
funds and to permit continuing  refinement of demonstration  techniques
applicable to this site, a  staged construction program is recommended.
The two major sources of mine drainage have  previously been  identified
as the Mine k~l Complex and  the  Mine  88 Complex.  The initial  concept of
a demonstration program  involved  sealing  the major points of  acidic
drainage and selected other openings  as necessary for  complete contain-
ment.  Subsequent  investigations  as  reported herein have  better defined
the extent of interconnections  of the  mine workings and have  dictated
the need for sealing all openings in  a particular complex.  The extent
of mine sealing necessary to curtail  drainage  from the Mine kj Complex
is shown as Phases  I and  II  on  Figure  2.   Similarly, the  Mine 88 Com-
plex  is shown as  Phase  III.  Detailed  analyses have been  performed to
determine which mine complex should  be sealed  as the initial  phase of
the program.  Results of these  analyses as related to  cost  and mine
drainage abatement effectiveness  are  presented at appropriate points
in this text.

Following  is an outline of  the  significant advantages  which  relate to
proceeding  initially with sealing of  the  Mine  4? Complex.

      1.  Openings  in the Mine  kj  Complex  are more readily accessible
         than are the openings  in the Mine 88  Complex. Construction
         will be  somewhat easier  and  the  impact on the natural  park
         environment will be less since construction of roadways
         through  forested areas will  be minimized.

      2.  Mine Opening kl  is the most visible source of mine drainage
         pollution  to the casual  visitor  in  the area.   Many of  the
         openings in the Mine  47'Complex  are relatively close to exist-
          ing  roadways.   The completed mine seals will, therefore,  be
         conveniently  located  for public  inspection and eliminate  the
         most noticeable mine  drainage source, thus enhancing the  demon-
         stration-aspects of the  project.
                               29

-------
     3-   The cost per unit of acid drainage eliminated  is  less for  the
          Mine k"J Complex than for the alternative.

     4-   The largest flow of acid to Sandy Run and Lake Hope  is from
          Mine Opening kl.  Therefore, the greatest improvement in water
          quality can be realized upon completion of the sealing of  the
          Mine kl Complex.

     5-   It  is possible and practical to break the sealing of the Mine
          47 Complex into two steps as shown as Phase I  and Phase  II in
          Figure 2.  Proceeding in this manner will permit  flooding  a
          good deal of the old mine workings and facilitate evaluation
          of  the effect of hydrostatic head on the geological formations
          at a minimal dollar investment.

The factors which would favor proceeding initially with the Mine 88
Complex can be summarized as follows:

     1.   The total cost for sealing the entire complex  is  less than for
          the Mine 4 7 Complex.  It is, therefore, possible  to eliminate
          a substantial source of mine drainage for a lower capital  ex-
          pend! ture.

     2.   The maximum hydrostatic head which must be imposed on the
          seals when the old mine workings are completely flooded  is
          approximately 17 feet.  The hydrostatic head for  the alter-
          native mine complex is approximately 30 feet.   This differ-
          ence in hydrostatic pressure will influence costs for seals
          and the remedial grouting required to eliminate seepage
          through the geological formations.

On the basis of the foregoing comparison of advantages to each alterna-
tive and the more detailed quantitative comparisons presented  in subse-
quent sections of this report, it is recommended that the initial mine
sealing be conducted in the Mine k~J Complex in a two-phase  operation as
illustrated in Figure 2 and subsequently described.

Core Boring Program

To better define geological factors influencing the design  of mine seals,
three core borings were taken in the vicinity of Mine Opening kl as
shown in Figure 8.  The characteristics of the core sections removed
are illustrated.   As shown, the borings detailed overburden material
of soft sandstone.  The coal averaged nearly k feet in thickness and
was underlain by hard fire clay.  The data from the borings are felt
to be generally applicable to the other mines in the demonstration
project area.
                                     30

-------
                            rxj
                 0
                 L
                               20
10
 i
                    SCALE IN FEET
   REMA
   COAL
     BORING
                             BORING
                                2
                                           BORING
                                              3
            0.0-9.1
SOFT
BROWN
SANDSTONE


GREY     | .-.••-.-:|9.1-17.0
SANDSTONE.

SOFT COAL_BBH|i7-0-21-0
HARD CLAY_CZZ!Zl2l .0-24.0
                                0.0-5.0
                                5.0-18.3
                                8.3-22.3
                             -^-£2.3-21.3
                 CORE SECTIONS
                                                  0.0-28.0
                                                  28.0-39.8
                                                  39.8-13.5
                                              f f3.5-16.0

                                                  16.0-16.5
FIGURE  8  -  CORE  BORINGS  AT  MINE OPENING  47
                       31

-------
After coring, the holes were pressure tested with water.  The results of
these pressure tests are as follows:

                   Depth (Ft.)     Press. Gage,*     Time,    Water  Injected,
Boring No.        From     To         psi            Min.         Gal.	

     1            17-0    24.0       17-0             10          0.1

     1            12.0    24.0       12.0              7          0.2

     2            18.0    24.3       18.0             10          6.5

     2            13.0    24.3       13-0             10          3-0

     3            39.5    44.5       35.0             10          9-0

     3            34.5    39-5       30.0             10          0

*P res sure gage read at top of hole.

The general observation which can be made as a result of these borings is
that the coal seam and overburden are relatively tight.  A limited loss of
water would be expected through the geological formations.  It can be fur-
ther concluded on the basis of the pressure tests that a grouting procedure
would be effective in reducing or eliminating localized seepage where such
conditions develop.  This conclusion was also verified by the drilling con-
tractor who has had a great deal of experience with grouting of semiper-
meable stratas.

Inspection of the old mine roofs and the boring cores did reveal one pos-
sible defect in the geological system, however.  Rather large fractures
were observed which appeared to run vertically through the entire depth of
the sandstone overburden.  While drilling one hole (Boring 3 in Figure 8)
the water used in the drilling operation was lost and observed to be
entering Mine 47 through a fracture in the roof nearly 18 feet below.
These defects in the sandstone wi11 undoubtedly cause some problems  in
the mine sealing operation.  It would appear that they can be success-
fully grouted, however, and therefore are not felt to be an insurmount-
able obstacle to the mine sealing program.

Phase 1 - Mine Sealing Program

The first phase of the recommended mine sealing program consists of  con-
struction of watertight seals on Mine Openings 40 through 52 inclusive,
pressure grouting of the porous and fractured stratas above and directly
adjacent to the mine seals, and remedial pressure grouting along the coal
outcrop into which these openings have been driven as seepage areas
appear.  This first phase, of activity will be accomplished in three
steps:

     1.  Site preparation.
                                     32

-------
     2.  Construction of seals  in mine openings.

     3.  Pressure grouting of porous  rock  formations above and directly
         adjacent to the mine openings and  remedial pressure grouting
         as seepage areas appear.

Site Preparation - First efforts will be directed  toward preliminary
cleaning Mine Openings 40-52  inclusive, as  shown  in Figure 9.  Addi-
tional exposure of the coal seam as necessary  to  locate seepage areas
would be done by the general contractors during the construction phases.

Material removed from the coal  face will either be dispersed throughout
the area or stockpiled for utilization  in  dressing up the site follow-
ing completion of all construction activity.

Mine Seal ing - Mine Openings 40-52 and any  currently unidentified interme-
diate openings which may be located during  site preparation will be sealed
as the second step of the program.  This stage also includes thorough
cleaning of the mine portals and any  other  preliminary work required
preparatory to the actual sealing operation.

A number of factors which influence the design and construction of the
mine seals are apparent on the  basis  of close  visual inspection of the
mine openings and the surrounding terrain.  These  include:

      1.  The coal seam is generally above  grade throughout the area,
         although not far enough above the  valley  floor to present
         severe access problems.  Little additional site work will be
         required of the contractor in order to locate his equipment
         near the mine openings.

     2.  Mine portals into the  old workings are generally quite short.
         Mine operators branched out  into  rooms very near the entrance
         so that there may be  less than ten feet of coal remaining be-
         hind the outcrop in some locations.   This was verified in
         detail, near Mine k~] as th,e survey was completed to establish
         locations for core borings.

     3.  Only the pillars remain  in the mines; there is little, if any,
         mineable coal left.

     k.  Roof structure  is sound with few  "falls"  near the mine en-
         trances.  Vertical fractures In the sandstone overburden are
         present in many of the area  mines.  At Mine 4?, these are mostly
         perpendicular to the  tunnels and  occur at approximately  20-foot
         intervals.  The fractures normally average  1  1/2  inches  in
         width.  Tree roots were observed  in one  fracture  near the en-
         trance to Mine 47-
                              33

-------
      100   200   300
       II     )
    SCALE IN FEET

-------
      5.   Much of the gob was left in the mine and is piled randomly at
          the sides Of the tunnels and back into the workings.

      6.   The vertical height of the coal seam and most of the openings
          is relatively consistent at about 3 feet 6 inches to k feet.

 The preferred type of seal for installation in the Lake Hope area consists
 of front and rear bulkheads of self-supporting concrete with a light
 expansive-type cement placed between the bulkheads.   This approach has
 been used successfully.   A high flow mine located three miles west of
 Lost Creek in Harrison County, West Virginia, was closed with an expan-
 sive cement type seal.  The procedure, material used, and results are
 outlined in "New Mine Sealing Techniques for Water Pollution Abatement"
 published by the Environmental Protection Agency (14010 DM0 03/70).

 The expansive cement type seals can be placed from the front of the mines
 after the portals are cleaned.  Plan and section of the recommended
 seal are shown in Figure  10.  The rear bulkhead is placed first.  A front
'bulkhead is then constructed with grouting pipes through the structure
 as necessary to install  the center plug.  Following completion of the
 front bulkhead, the expansive cement is placed between the two bulkhead$
 to complete the mine seal.

 As shown in the figure,  a drain pipe is placed through the entire seal
 with a valve on the outside end.  This will permit regulation of the
 rate of water accummulation behind the seal, thus assuring that the water
 level will not rise too rapidly before the concrete is strong enough to
 withstand the applied head.  It will also be possible to lower the leva)
 of the impounded water to effect remedial measures if excessive seepage
 is noted along the face of the outcrop.

 Alternative Mine Sealing Technique - To date, only a limited number of
Contractors have the technology, experience and equipment necessary to
'install  an expansive cement type mine seal.  Therefore, in order to
 obtain more competitive  bids for the Lake Hope Demonstration Project,
 inclusion of an alternate mine sealing technique is considered desirable.
 For this alternative, plain concrete plug seals, as shown in Figure 11,
 are recommended.  This seal is a variation of the approach selected for
 the Moraine State Park pollution abatement program.  In Moraine State
 Park, mine sealing resulted in a 75 percent reduction in acid flow from
 drift mines similar to those at the Lake Hope site.

 The alternative type of mine seal consists of a simple concrete plug  in
 the mine opening.   It is anticipated that this plug can be  installed  by
working  entirely from the front face of the outcrop.  A rear form or
                              35

-------
FRONT
BULKHEAD
  FACE OF
  COAL   y
  SEAM-/
   EXPANSIVE CEMENT.
   PLUG
             10'
                        GROUT CURTAIN HOLES  -
                        PRESSURE CURTAIN  GROUTING TO
                        EXTEND A MINIMUM  OF  20'  ON  BOTH
                        SIDES OF MINE ENTRY
                             PLAN
 HIGHWALL
DRAIN
EXPANSIVE
CEMENT
PLUG
                                              Jftl N)'
                                              REAR
                                              BULKHEAD
                                10'
                               (MIN.)
                             SECTION
             FIGURE  10  -  PREFERRED  MINE  SEAL

-------
                                 CONCRETE  PLUG
FACE
OF
COAL
SEAM
                                 GROUT CURTAIN HOLES - PRESSURE CURTAIN
                                 TO EXTEND A MINIMUM OF 20* ON BOTH SIDES
                                 OF MINE ENTRY
               FIGURE  11   -  ALTERNATE  MINE  SEAL
                                37

-------
bulkhead is required behind the plug in order to hold the mass concrete
in place.  This could consist, of a wooden form, a grouted aggregate
bulkhead, or similar arrangement at the contractor's convenience.   It  is
recommended that the front form be constructed of wood which will be
removed after the concrete is set.  This enhances construction and mini-
mizes the distance required from the face of the outcrop to the face of
the seal.  The contractor will be required to cut filling chutes  in the
rock above the front form to assure that the void between the forms is
completely filled and to provide a means for vibrating the concrete.

After the concrete plug is completed, grout will be injected from above
to compensate for shrinkage effects.  A minimum plug length of 12 feet
is recommended to allow for complete pressure grout sealing.

In Moraine State Park, this type of seal was constructed utilizing both
front and rear bulkheads of grouted aggregate with the center plug of
plain concrete.  At that location, however, it was necessary that the
entire seal be placed from above, rather than from the front as is
possible at Lake Hope.  The seals at Moraine State Park have success-
fully impounded heads up to 30 feet of water, which is comparable to
what will be required at Lake Hope.

Pressure Grouting - The final step in the first phase operation will
consist of sealing the face of the coal outcrop and the porous overbur-
den material.  A grout curtain will be installed above and approxi-
mately 20 feet on either side of each mine seal.  The relationship of
the grout curtain to the mine seals is shown in an isometric view of
a typical opening in Figure 12.

As shown in the figure, the grout curtain will extend across the mine
seal  and to the full height of the overburden material.  The grout cur-
tain at the mine opening is necessary to seal the void caused by shrink-
age between the sandstone overburden and the concrete mine seal.  The
material on either side of the mine seal will probably be fractured and
some grouting should be done  in this area.  A grout curtain over and ad-
jacent to the mine seal will be necessary regardless of whether the
expansive cement type of seal or the alternate concrete plug seal is
selected.

Pressure grouting will also be done as a remedial measure between open-
ings as seepage areas become apparent.  For cost estimating purposes,
it has been assumed that pressure grouting will be required along the
entire construction area beginning at a point approximately 50 feet
southwest of Mine 40 and extending some 50 feet north of Mine 52.
The vertical cracks in the sandstone formation will be washed and
filled with grout.  The grouting will continue  throughout the sealing
program until the mines are filled with water to the desired final
elevation.

Phase2 - Mine Sealing Program

Phase 2 activities will follow by three to four months and expand upon
the procedures and results obtained in the Phase 1 operation.  Assuming


                                   38

-------
           GROUT CURTAIN
           ALIGNMENT
MINE
ENTRY
      FIGURE  12 -  ISOMETRIC DRAWING OF MINE SEAL
                          39

-------
the Phase 1 sealing is successful in impounding water  in the old mine
workings, it will then be necessary to seal all other  mines which have
an interconnection with those previously sealed.   In general terms, Phase
2 operation (Mine Openings 14-39 and 53~55) will proceed through the same
three steps as Phase 1.

Due to the slope on the coal  seam, openings in the vicinity of Mine 39
are approximately 14.6 feet higher than the openings sealed in the first
phase program.  The slope of the seam continues upward to the northwest
along Big Four Hollow so that openings around Mine 26  are some 26.6
feet higher than Mine 47 and openings in the vicinity  of Mine 14 are
approximately 32.8 feet higher than tyine 47-

Openings will be sealed utilizing one or both of the alternative approaches
previously presented, except Mine Openings 14 through  26.  Due to the
relatively low hydrostatic head which will be applied  at these openings,
it may be possible to achieve greater economy by utilizing a permeable
type of mine seal as shown in Figure 13-  The procedure, materials used,
and results are outlined in "New Mine Sealing Techniques for Water Pollu-
tion Abatement," published by the Environmental Protection Agency (14010
DM0 03/70).  Full evaluation of the application of this type of seal to
the Lake Hope Project is deferred until results of the Phase 1 activity.

Field survey has located several mine openings (20 and 21)  in the area
that are already sealed with concrete block.  These seals will be util-
ized to the extent possible in the design of the complete Phase II seal-
ing program.

At Mine Openings 53> 54, and 55, the coal is some 15 feet below the
surface and Access is gainecj through steeply inclined shafts.   These
openings are presently flooded to a level above the top of the coal
seam.   It is anticipated that as Mines 40-52 are sealed, the water
level  will rise in these mines and they will also have to be sealed.
Slightly different procedures will have to be utilized in placing
mine seals under water in these three openings.  The same general
type of seal can be utilized with modification of the  placement pro-
cedure to account for the unique entrance conditions.

A grout curtain will extend to the maximum hydrostatic elevation over
and adjacent to mine seals except at Mine Openings 14-26.  The elevation
of the coal seam at these mine openings precludes the  need for ex-
cessive hydrostatic head on the mine seals.  Remedial  pressure grout-
ing will be undertaken as accessary to eliminate points of seepage.
Economies in the total program cost will be realized if/the geological
strata are tight enough to eliminate remedial pressure grouting  in some
aireas .   For cost estimating purposes, it has been assumed -that grouting
will not be necessary in the area between Mine Openings 14 through 26.
Vents
The mine complex will have a drain installed at an elevation above  the
highest point in the coal seam in the series of Mines  14 through 55.
                                      40

-------
FACE OF
COAL SEAM
                        GRADED
                        LIMESTONE
                        AGGREGATE
         FIGURE  13 -  PERMEABLE  MINE  SEAL

-------
This venting of  the mines will  insure  that  the  seals  will  not be sub-
jected  to an excessive head  of  water.   The  top  of the vent will be
about 33 feet above the  top  of  the  coal  seam at Mine  47 (Elevation 833)•
Water standing to  this elevation will  submerge  all  the reactive compo-
nents through all  of  the old workings  in this mine  complex.  Vents will
consist of  several 6-inch diameter  vertical  holes drilled  into the work-
ings from the slope above the mine  openings  in  the  40-52 series.  An
overflow will be provided at Elevation 833-   Clay pipe will carry over-
flow from the mines to the bottom of the hill.
                                              AFTER
                                              PHASE I
                                              SEALING-x
HYDROSTATIC WATER LEVEL
AFTER PHASE I I  SEALING
                                                         ELEVATIONS

EL. 829.0     //     — -^J^^^^^v^  _^     \    833.0
                 -EXISTING
                 HYDRAULIC

                 G*ADIENT                               MINE
                                                       OPENING 47-
                    FIGURE 14  - CROSS-SECTION
                                  AND WATER ELEVATIONS
One 3-inch diameter sampling hole will be drilled  from  the  top of the
hill into the mine complex at a  location designated  by  the  Division of
Geological Survey of the Ohio Department of  Natural  Resources.  This
3-inch diameter hole will be equipped for sampling air  and  water within
the mine.

The anticipated water surface elevation  in the mines  following the com-
pletion of Phase I and Phase II  is  shown on  Figure 14.

Phase 3 - Mine Sealing

Sealing Mine Openings 76 through 103 has been considered  both  as an al-
ternative to sealing Mine Openings  14 through 55 and as a portion of


                                     42

-------
a total program for the entire area.  This series of mines  is  located
southeast of Big Four Hollow Road.  At  present, drainage emits from
Mine Openings 88 and 91.

Core borings taken at Mine Opening ^5 are believed to be typical of
this area also.  Factors  influencing the design and construction of mine
seals  in this area based  on visual inspection of the mine openings and
the surrounding terrain are the same as previously outlined  relative to
Phases I  and II except that the coal outcrop and mine openings are gen-
erally located nearly 20  feet above the valley floor.  This  presents a
severe access problem which has added to the estimated cost  of this
phase.

A sealing program in the  Mine Opening 88 Complex could be accomplished
in two parts.  First efforts would seal Mine Openings 76 through 92
excluding 81, 82, and 83.  Field  inspection has shown that Mine Openings
81, 82, and 83 are not physically connected to the Mine 88 Complex al-
though a small amount of  seepage was noted on the backwall at Mine
Opening 81.

The solid plug-type Mine  Seal previously described is recommended for
this complex.  Pressure grouting will be provided over and directly
adjacent to the mine seals.  Remedial pressure grouting will seal
seepage areas that develop as water levels build up in the abandoned
mines.

The second part of Phase  III mine sealing would begin after  the period
required to evaluate the  initial activity and would involve  sealing
Mine Openings 93 through  107-  Maximum  hydrostatic head developed in
this series would be at an elevation approximately 17-0 feet above
Mine Opening 88.

Based  upon results from the initial sealing, permeable mine  seals could
be considered as an alternative for Mine Openings 98 through 107 where
the hydrostatic head is not excessive.  Pressure grouting over and ad-
jacent to Mine Openings 98 through 107  has not been included in the
comparative cost estimates developed for Phase III.

Cost Estimates

A cost estimate has been  prepared for each of the elements  in the total
mine drainage abatement program.  These costs are summarized in Table 5-
Figures presented are based upon funds  expended to date where applicable
and on anticipated 1972 cost levels for the remaining elements.  The
cost of mine seals has been varied to reflect field conditions and the
type and size of bulkhead which will be provided.

-------
                              TABLE 5

                       PROGRAM COST ESTIMATE
Land Acquisition Costs
Name
Harkless
Yates
Sheffield
Fuller
Egg lest on
Powers
Tay 1 o r
Bray
McDaniel
McDaniel
Mead

Ogan Hei rs
Fuller
White
McDaniel
Ogan Heirs
Total
Interest
Fee
Fee
Fee
Fee
Fee
Fee
Fee
Fee
Fee
Fee
Surface

Mineral
Fee
Fee
Fee
Fee

Acres
39.60
160.00
941.75
45.00
70.00
80.00
147.00
390-00
100.04
182.00
1 ,030.00
(i)
1,030.00U'
20.00
48.00
55.00
114.00(4)

Cost
$ 5,000
15,100
67,800
50,000
7,100
5,100
15,200
35,000
21 ,500
18,200
69,195

52,000
30,000
30,320
25,000
37,000

                                                        (2)
                                                        (3)

                                                        (3)
                                                            $431,515
                                                                    (5)
(l)  In watershed - total parcel  is 2,637«00 acres.
(2)  Not included in request for matching funds.
(3)  Estimated cost - transaction not finalized.
(4)  In watershed - total parcel  is 247-00 acres.
(5)  Funds expended.
                                     44

-------
Refuse Removal

        Equipment Operators                      $ 13,920
        Supervision                                 6,080
        Lowboy and Tractor                          ],273
        Bulldozer                                   4,400
        Grader                                      2,550
        Belt Loader                                   665
        Dragline                                    1,800
        Dump Truck                                  9,120
        Hydroseeder                                   192             /,,
            Total                                             $ 40,000U'

Consultant Services
(Not  including design fees or  resident supervision)

        Base Line Water Quality Study            $ 19,000^ '
        Feasibility Study                          16,500
        Post Construction Studies and Report       30,000

            Total                                             $ 65,500

        Flow Monitoring Installation and                              /,\
          Equipment Total                                     $ 58,6l6u;

Phase  I Mine Sealing

        Preliminary Location of Outcrop          $  4,500

        Mine Openings 40, 41,  42, 46, 48
          49, 50, 51, & 52

            Site Preparation                       13,500
            Mine Seals - 9 @ 6,000 each            54,000

        Mine Openings 43, 44,  & 45

            Site Preparation                        6,000
            Mine Seals -38 8,000 each            24,000

        Mine Opening 47

            Site Preparation                        2,500
            Mine Seal                              15,000

        Mine Seal and Remedial Grouting

            Site Preparation                        2,500
            Drilling                               19,800
            Grouting                               ft)*OOP
        Subtotal                                 $181,800

(1)   Funds expended.

                                45

-------
         Program Surveillance                        5,000
         Administration, Engineering and
           Contingency                              40,200

         TOTAL                                               $227,000

Phase 2 Mine Seal ing

         Preliminary Excavation of Outcrop           7,000

         Mine Openings 53, 51*, & 55

             Site  Preparation                        7,500
             Mine  Seals - 3 @ 9,000                 27,000

         Mine Openings 14 through 39

             Site  Preparation                       36,400
             Mine  Seals - 7 @ 4,900                 34,300
             Mine  Seals - 21  § 6,000               126,000

         Mine Seal  and Remedial Grouting

             Site  Preparation                        6,100
             Drilling                               46,300
             Grouting                               99,600
         Subtotal                                  $390,200

         Program Surveillance                       15,000
         Administration, Engineering and
           Contingency                              82,300

         TOTAL                                               $487,500

         Total Estimated Project Cost                      $1,310,131

Cost Comparison

To arrive at the most cost effective mine drainage demonstration pro-
gram, a comparison was made of the several alternatives available for
sealing mines in the study area.  The comparison evaluated sealing Mine
47 Complex as contrasted to Mine 88 Complex.  In both cases a reduction
of acid discharge as a result of the mine sealing program was estimated
to be 60 percent.    In the case of the Mine 47 Complex, an acid reduction
of 321,000 pounds  per year or 46 percent of the total acid entering Lake
Hope would be contained.  Based on the estimated $714,500 cost of seal-
ing this complex as previously presented, unit costs for the program
amount to $2.23 per pound of acid reduction.

The estimated cost of the Phase  III sealing program as an alternative
to Phases I  and II  previously presented is developed in Table 6.

A cost-effectiveness evaluation for the Mine 88 Complex indicates a
reduced acid load of 225,000 pounds per year (32 percent of the total


                                     46

-------
entering Lake Hope) at a  cost  of  $601,900.   The  unit  cost of acid
reduction for this series of mine openings  is  $2.57 per pound.

Based on the foregoing analysis,  sealing of  the  Mine  47 Complex was
deemed to be the most cost effective.   This  conclusion forms the basis
for establishing the recommended  program as  outlined  herein   Water
quality improvements which further justify  proceeding in the recommended
manner are discussed in "Part  V - Project Effectiveness."

                                  TABLE  6

                          PHASE I I I  COST ESTIMATE

fnitia? Mine Sealing - Mine Openings  76-80 and 84-92.

    Site Preparation                                $ 43 000
    Mine Seals - 15 @ 6,000                           90^000

    Mine Seal and Remedial Grouting

        Site Preparation                              10,500
        Drilling                                      40,500
        Grouting                                      81,000
                                                               $270,000

Second Stage Mine Sealing - Mine  Openings 93~107

    Site Preparation                                $ 42,000
    Mine Seals - 14 @ 6,000                           84,000

    Mine Seal and Remedial Grouting

        Site Preparation                               6,500
        Drilling                                      26,000
        Grouting                                      53.000
                                                               $211,500

    Administration, Engineering and
      Contingency                                               120,400

TOTAL ESTIMATED PHASE III COST                                $601,900

Program Surveillance

The U. S. Geological Survey stream gaging and sampling program conducted
in cooperation with the State  of  Ohio has previously  been outlined.
Thjs program will be continued to provide the basic data for evaluation
of program effectiveness.

As outlined, the stream at points 310,  320,  and  420 will be monitored
continuously for flow, pH, temperature  and conductance.  Dissolved
                                47

-------
oxygen will also be continuously determined at gaging station 310-   'n
addition, samples will be collected at each of the three stations  twice
a month for analysis for the list of parameters presently being evalu-
ated as specified in "Part III - Inventory and Forecast."

Upon completion of Phase I  and Phase II mine sealing, there should  be
no free flowing discharge from the sealed mine complex except for  the
vents or high level drains which will be provided to relieve hydrostatic
pressure at an elevation above all of the old mine workings.  Provision
will be made for monitoring this discharge from the mined area either
on a continuous or periodic basis depending upon the flow conditions
which develop.

The combination of the continuous monitoring of stream flow and collec-
tion of data related to the vented discharge from the mined area will
adequately establish the effectiveness of the mine drainage abatement
project.

The final aspect of program surveillance will involve an evaluation of
all data collected and preparation of a summary report on the abatement
project.  Additional intensive sampling of sources and amount of con-
tinuing mine drainage discharges will be undertaken at that time.  This
phase of activity will be deferred until adequate records are available
to establish trends in mine drainage production from the project site.
A minimum of two and possibly as many as four or five years from the
completion of construction is recommended to provide time for the system
to stabilize and for adequate records to be accumulated.

Emergency Procedures

All possible precautions will be taken during the period of construction
to assure that no slugs of acid contaminated water are discharged  into
the streams at the project site.  If it becomes necessary to reduce the
volume of water impounded in the old mines at any point during or after
the  construction  activity, discharge rate w? 11 either be., control led so
that there are no detrimental effects or lime will be added to maintain
the desi red pH.

As previously noted, all discharges from the area will be routinely
monitored.  Developing hazarous conditions will be noted and appropriate
emergency measures undertaken if necessary to cope with a particular
s i tuat ion.

-------
                  PART  V  -  PROJECT EFFECTIVENESS
Water Quality  Improvements

The effectiveness of  a  mine sealing project is related to a number of
natural^variables,  most notably hydrologic and geologic factors.   The
complexities  inherent in such  a natural  system compounded by man's dis-
ruption of natural  phenomena through mining and construction of mine
seals make rigorous evaluation of the expected mine drainage pollution
reduction extremely difficult.  A number of mine sealing programs  has
been undertaken  in  recent years.   However, at the present time published
data on the  reduction in acid  load to area streams attributable to mine
sealing is quite  limited.

The Moraine  State Park  project as reported at the Third Symposium  on
Coal Mine Drainage  Research at Pittsburgh in May, 1970, has yielded pre-
liminary results  indicating 70 to 80 percent reduction in mine drainage
discharge as  a  result of a  mine sealing  program.   Limited data on  other
projects indicates  this to  be  a reasonable order-of-magnitude expecta-
tion for mine sealing effectiveness.

For the purpose of  this report, an overall reduction in acid load  to
the stream from a mine  sealing project has been taken as 60 percent of
the present  average discharge.  This  is  probably a conservatively  low
percentage and  there  is a good possibility that better results will  be
rea1i zed.

On  the  basis  of 60  percent  reduction of  the acid load from sealing Mine
kj  and  the interconnected complex, a total of 321,000 pounds less  of
acid will reach Sandy Run than at the present time.   The anticipated net
result  of this  reduced  acid discharge will be reflected in an approxi-
mate 26 mg/1  reduction  in the  average acid concentration in Sandy  Run
at  the  USGS  gaging  station  and 14 mg/1 in Lake Hope.   The average  pre-
sent acid concentration in  Lake Hope as  reported in  the Base Line  Water
Quality Report  is 31  mg/1 with the concentration frequently ranging be-
tween 20 and  30 mg/1.   Therefore, when the effects of the mine sealing
program are  fully realized, the average  net acidity  in Lake Hope will
nearly  be cut  in half from  present levels.

The pH  increase corresponding  to the indicated reduction in total  acidity
is  impossible to predict, since there is no practical mathematical  corre-
lation  between acidity  and  pH.  Some improvement in  pH is certain, how-
ever, and a  reasonable  estimate of the prevalent pH  range in Lake  Hope
after completion of recommended mine sealing improvements is 6.0 to 7-0.
An average pH  increase  in Sandy Run of 1.0 units is  also expected.

Comparatively,  if the Mine  88  Complex is sealed, a net reduction of 18
mg/1 of acidity  in  Sandy Run and 10 mg/1 in Lake Hope might be expected.
This would yield a  pH improvement in the order of 0.5 units less than
could be achieved by  sealing the Mine 4? Complex.  In view of relatively
minor cost differential between the two  alternatives and the substantially

-------
better water quality results which can be achieved,  the  recommendation  for
proceeding  initially with Phases  I and 1! appears fully  justified.

The total estimated cost for the  recommended Phase  I and Phase  II Lake
Hope mine drainage demonstration  program has previously  been  presented
as $1,310,131.  Amortizing this cost at 5 percent interest over a 50-
year period yields an annual capital recovery cost of $71,769-  For  the
estimated acid  load reduction of  321,000 pounds per  year, an  annual  unit
cost for the mine drainage abatement program is calculated at $447 per
ton of acid discharge reduction.

The proposed mine drainage abatement project would eliminate  approximately
one percent of  the total acid mine drainage presently generated within
the Raccoon Creek Basin as reported in the November, 1967> "Recommenda- -
tions for Water Pollution Control, Raccoon Creek Basin,  Ohio" prepared
by the Ohio Basin Region of the Federal Water Pollution  Control Admin-
istration.

Other Demonstration Values

The proposed mine drainage abatement demonstration project is located
within a widely used state park.  As a result, there is  a considerable
exposure of the public  to efforts by state and federal agencies to abate
mine drainage pollution and improve the environment.

With the existing state park facilities as a focal point, interpretive
facilities could be developed to  illustrate mining techniques, sources
of acid mine drainage,  pollution  abatement techniques, and to put the
entire field of coal extraction and mine drainage abatement  in proper
perspect ive.

Benefits
The greatest single benefit attributable to the proposed mine drainage
demonstration project will relate to the improved  recreational  value
of Lake Hope and  indirectly, of all other facilities  in Lake Hope  State
Park.  The Lake Hope site  is extremely beneficial  to  the general public,
as 658,938 visitors visited the park in 1970.

*At similar parks  throughout the state of Ohio, approximately  10 percent
of the visiting public utilizes the water resource for fishing.  By  im-
proving the aquatic environment of Lake Hope, fish reproduction will
return to normal  and fisherman visitations to Lake Hope might  increase
by as much as 55>000 persons annually.  As a result,  utilization of  the
entire Lake 
-------
Removal of the random coal  refuse  remaining  from active  mining  opera-
tions greatly enhances  the  aesthetics  of the area.   The  coal  refuse
generally did not support a vegetative cover and, therefore,  was  a
visual detraction from  the  general  natural  setting  of the area.   With
removal or burying of the coal  refuse  and surface restoration of  the
affected sites,  the entire  region  will soon be restored  to a  more
natural and pleasing condition.

General area visual conditions  will  also be improved as  a result  of  the
mine  sealing efforts.   Mine drainage normally carries a  high  iron con-
centration which precipitates out  to create a rust  colored coating on
stream banks and objects  in contact with the water.  Partial  relief  of
this  condition will be  realized in Sandy Run as a result of'the pro-
posed program.

-------
             PART VI -  IMPLEMENTATION  AND OPERATION


Project Responsibility

Responsibility for  initiation  and  follow-through  on  all  aspects of  the
mine drainage abatement  demonstration  project  is  the responsibility of
the Ohio Department of  Natural  Resources.   All  divisions of  the depart-
ment have assisted  in the  accumulation and evaluation of the preliminary
development of the  proposed  project.   Other state and federal agencies
have also been involved  in  the  planning and design of a workable program.

Jurisdictional authority  is  clearly available  to  the Department of
Natural Resources to carry out  the mine drainage  abatement program. Land
is in state ownership and  therefore succeeding  phases of the project
can and will proceed immediately.

The mine seals are  anticipated  to  require very  little routine maintenance.
Ohio Department of  Natural  Resources personnel  now assigned to Lake Hope
can regularly monitor the  physical condition of the  seals as they go
about their regular duties at  the  site.   Responsibilities and procedures
for water quality surveillance  has previously  been outlined.

Program Schedule

Figure 15 outlines  a schedule  under which  the  various elements of the
mine drainage abatement  demonstration  project  may be undertaken.  As
shown, the period between  December, 1971»  and  June,  1972, is allotted
to finalizing the feasibility  report and  preparing construction plans
and specifications.  The project will  be  advertised  for bidding during
July, 1972.

Phase I mine sealing is  scheduled  for  August,  1972,  through January,
1973.  This will be followed by a  minimum  of four months of evaluation
of the initial sealing,  during  which decisions will  be made regarding
the remedial grouting in Phase  I and development  of  the details of
Phase II  mine seal.  This  second phase of  sealing will be undertaken
during the June, 1973,  through  February,  197^,  period.

The final project report  is  scheduled  for  production in  February through
June, 1976.  This will  allow two full  years for data collection following
completion of Phase I!  mine  sealing.   However,  as has been previously
mentioned, it may be desirable  to  increase or  decrease the time for
data accumulation prior  to producing the  final  project document.

Water quality monitoring  is  seen to be a  continuing  effort throughout
the span of project activity.   Monitoring of water quality character-
istics will continue up  to five years  beyond the  period  supported by
demonstration grant funds.
                                 53

-------
   I
   — CM
   O)O)
               CM
               f-.
               CT>
                           CM CO
                          I
                          CO
                          Is- co
                          o> r^
                          — o>
                                                       O5O5
   oz
                                         00 >-
                                         UJ «t
                                                                -»• •*
FINALIZE
FEASIBILITY
REPORT
FINALIZE
CONSTRUCT 10
DOCUMENTS
BID
PHASE I
MINE SEALING
EVALUATE
PHASE I
MINE
SEALING
PHASE I I
MINE
SEALING
FINAL
PROJECT
REPORT
 COMPLETE
 REFUSE
 REMOVAL
                         WATER QUALITY MONITORING
                                                  CONTINUING
                                                  SURVEILLANCE
                  FIGURE  15  -  PROGRAM  SCHEDULE

-------
           APPENDIX A
Lake Hope Base Line Water Quality
                 55

-------
                          PART  I  -  INTRODUCTION

Scope
••••• ili in. I.
     Presented herein are the results of studies made to characterize the
origin, quantity, and methods of  control for acid mine drainage to Lake Hope
from tributary streams.   It  is  the  principal objective of this study to
quantify the acid production to serve as a basis for corrective action.  The
major factor involved is  the planning and  implementation of a sampling and
testing program to produce the  required data.
     Specific items  included in the scope of studies are as follows:
     1.  Participate  in the selection of sites for two temporary flow
         monitoring  and sampling  stations.
     2.  Prepare design drawings  of the flow measuring structures and
         associated  housing for instrumentation and sampling of the
         two new stations, as well  as supplemental facilities at an
         existing USGS gaging station on the main stem of Sandy Run.
     3.  Conduct a preliminary sampling and testing program prior to
         monitoring  station construction for a period of three months.
         The purpose of this program is to provide analytical data not
         only on the Sandy Run and  tributary streams, but also individual
         sources of  acid  mine drainage.  Subsequent to installation of
         monitoring  stations, a second three-month program is to be
         implemented.
     k.  On the basis of  field  investigation and data compiled, the
         quantity and composition of acid mine drainage  is to  be
         determined.  This also is  correlated with precipitation events.
     5.  Identify and quantify acid production from various strip mine
         areas and refuse piles.
     6.  Determine the contribution of acid mine drainage into Lake Hope
         resulting from unmined areas.
     7.  Evaluate Lake Hope bottom  muds to determine the effect of acid
         mine drainage on present and future ecology of the lake.
                                    57

-------
     8.  Develop a specific recommendation for a program of mine sealing
         or other remedial techniques to be implemented.
     9.  Establish guidelines for future utilization of data collected.
Study Area
     Lake Hope is located in Vinton County, Ohio, some 60 miles southeast
of Columbus.  Access to the area is generally from U. S. Highway 50 which
runs east and west, south of the lake and by U. S. Highway 33 which connects
Athens and Columbus.  State Highway 278 connects these two major routes and
passes directly adjacent to Lake Hope and parallel to Sandy Run in the valley
above the lake.  Figure 1 is a map showing Lake Hope and the tributary
drainage basin.
     Lake Hope State Park with Lake Hope as the focal point is located deep
within the 19,000-acre Zaleski  State Forest.  The Department of Natural
Resources, through a development program which dates back to the early
1930's, has continually added to the park facilities so that extensive
recreational opportunities are now available in the area.  The attractive
dining lodge and numerous cabins provide basic visitor accommodations.
Park facilities provide for hiking, horseback  riding, boating, swimming
and camping.
     Lake Hope was constructed during 1938-1939 and filled with water during
the spring of 1939.  The total  drainage area tributary to the Lake Is slightly
over 10 square miles.   Approximately ]26 acres of water surface are provided;
the estimated total storage volume in the lake  at the time of construction
was something over 1,500 acre-feet.
Previous Report
      The studies  reported herein are a further development following the
study "Lake Hope - Report on Acid Mine Drainage Program" prepared for the
Department of Natural  Resources by Stanley Consultants.   That report documents
a  number of previous studies and reports on field investigations and previous
program considerations.   It also describes potential means of providing an
acid mine drainage abatement program.   The data and the various prior reports
referenced therein have been used as background material for these studies.
                                      58

-------
FIGURE  1
                                   NOTE:  SAMPLING POINT NUMBER FOR
                                         MINES  IS OBTAINED BY
                                         ADDING 500 TO MINE OPENING
                                         NUMBERS.
           SCALE  IN FEET

LAKE  HOPE DRAINAGE BASIN  -  VICINITY  MAP
                                 59

-------
                    PART  II - WATER  CHARACTERISTICS

Data Requirements
     It is necessary that sufficient  data be obtained to quantify the acid
contribution of Sandy Run to Lake Hope.  Also, significant acid contributions
to Sandy Run from major tributary sources must be defined.  Supplemental
information in the form of data on iron, sulfate and dissolved oxygen content
as well as temperature and conductivity will aid in a more complete charac-
terization of water quality.
     In prior reports, 9 considerable amount of data has been presented  which
show results of pH tests made on water samples from Lake Hope and tributary
sources.  However, information on total acid content has been very limited.
     The pH parameter measures only  the concentration of hydrogen ion.  It
does not measure total acid concentration.  An example of the lack of
correlation between pH and acidity is shown on Figure 2 where pH and acidity
of samples from Lake Hope are compared.  Analyses of samples from other  points
where acid concentration  is higher would show even less correlation.  Therefore,
the major thrust in obtaining data was to measure both water flows and acid
concentration to arrive at acid quantities on a weight basis.
Sampling and Gaging Programs
     The sampling and gaging surveillance program was initiated in April,
1970.   It consisted of two parts:  one executed by United States Geological
Survey (USGS), and the second by Stanley Consultants.
     Initially, the USGS program consisted of flow measurement and sampling
at two-week intervals from three points shown on Figure 3:
     1.  Sandy Run at an existing gaging station a short distance upstream
         from Lake Hope (Sample Point 310)
     2.  Big Four Creek near the point where this stream enters Sandy Run.
         (Sample Point 420)
     3.  Sandy Run a small distance upstream from the point at which Big
         Four Creek enters (Sample Point 320)
                                      61

-------
00
70
60
50
ACIDITY W
Mg/L
30
20
10
0 .



































\







©





<






©


<





£>







0
t
<•>
) 0













\



0
(r\















e.
1
©



























1





















































! 3 4 5 6 7 £
pH
BU
70
60
50
•W AC 1 D 1 TY
Mg/L
30
20
10
0
FIGURE 2 - ph VS ACIDITY
           LAKE HOPE
              62

-------
 >-   MINE OPEKING
>«•   DISCHARGING MINE OPENING
 75   MINE OPENING NUMBER
 »   COAL REFUSE
     SAMPLING STATION
SCALE  iN FEET
       FIGURE  3  -  LAKE  HOPE DRAINAGE
                     BASIN -  MINE  OPENINGS
                            63

-------
     Flows at Sample Point 320 have been determined from a continuous stage
recorder at that location.  Prior to installation of monitoring stations,
flows  in Big Four Creek (Sample Point ^20} and in Sandy Run upstream from
Big Four Creek  (Sample Point 320) were obtained by means of a current meter.
Samples were taken manually from each of these three points for subsequent
laboratory analysis.  Temperature and pH measurements were made at the time
of sampling.  After installation of monitoring stations described later here-
in, all flow measurements were taken at these points from stage recorders.
Samples continued to be taken at two-week intervals for more complete labora-
tory analysis, While other parameters were measured on-site from continuous
monitoring uriits.                                     '
     The second phase of  the gaging and sampling program was performed by
Stanley Consultants.  The initial scope of the project contemplated two
sampling periods in this  phase.  The first period was to be an intensive
three-month sampling program followed by a reduced program for a three-month
period.  To coordinate with later than anticipated construction of the
monitoring stations, the order of sampling was reversed.  The initial period
from April, 1970, through June,  1970, including sampling at approximately two-
week intervals.  The subsequent stage, initiated in early March, 1971, and
extending through May, 1971, consisted of samples taken twice weekly.
     The intent of this phase of the program was to gage and sample sources
of acid mine drainage such as mine openings  and refuse areas.  A survey of
mine openings was made which revealed that only three had flows in excess of
a few gallons per minute.   These three mine  openings were provided with 90
degree V-notch wiers for flow measurement.  Such measurements have been made
and samples have been  taken  throughout the two sampling periods.   In addition,
stream samples and other small  flows entering the stream were sampled.  These
included one sample point  on Sandy Run upstream from the acid mine drainage
area.   Occasional  samples  have  been taken from other mine openings and refuse
areas.
                                    64

-------
 MonStoring Stations
      To provide a continuing record of water flow and water characteristics,
 monitoring stations were constructed.  Design of these facilities was
 included as a part of the studies reported herein.
      Facilities were added to an existing USGS gaging station on Sandy Run
 to provide a continuous sample for monitoring.  In-line analytical equipment
 is arranged to measure temperature, pH, conductivity and dissolved oxygen.
 Location of these facilities is at Sample Point No. 310 shown on Figure 3.
      Two other monitoring stations were constructed.  One is located on Big
 Four Creek just upstream from the point at which it flows into Sandy  Run.
 This 5s the same location as that of Sample Point No. ^20.  The other  station
 is located on Sandy Run just upstream from the point at which Big Four Creek
 enters.  This is the same location as Sample Point No. 320.   These stations
 sample and measure pH, conductivity and temperature.  In addition, they are
  provided with a primary measuring flume and gaging facility to measure flow.
 Testing Programs
      Procedures used  in obtaining samples for testing have been described
 previously.
      On those samples which are obtained at two-week intervals by the  United
 States Geological Survey, the following tests have been run:
      1.   Iron
      2.  Manganese
      3.  Dissolved  Solids (Residue on evaporation at 180 C.)
      k.  Total Hardness
      5.  Acidity  (to  pH = 8.3)
      6.   Sulfate
      7-   Specific Conductance
      8.  pH
      9.  Flow
      Since the automatic! monitor ing  stations have been placed  in operation,
these stations have  been continuously recording data on river stage, pH,
specific conductance, and temperature.  Dissolved oxygen  is also monitored at
Sample Point 310.  Data on river stage  (flow), pH, and temperature would be
                                       65

-------
required under any sampling program.  Continuous monitoring provides
more complete data.
      Information on dissolved oxygen is desirable to make sure that no
critical oxygen deficit exists.  Iron content of the mine drainage is for
the most part present in the ferrous form which is an effective reducing
agent, particularly when the pH Js  increased to near the neutral point.  Such
ferrous iron can therefore reduce the dissolved oxygen content of the
water.  Organic matter present as vegetation degradation products can also
exert an oxygen demand.
      Although not specifically measuring acid content, conductivity does
provide a mea,ns for approximate appraisal of acid content.   The acidity-
conductivity relationship is shown on Figure 4 for three sampling points.
      The program of manual sampling at  the  three stream  locations by USGS
 is  continuing  at two-week  intervals.  Analysis of these  samples will provide
more  complete  data to  supplement the continuously recorded parameters.
      Analysts  made by  Stanley  Consultants on samples taken from mine openings,
 refuse  piles,  and  streams  include the following:
      1.  Flow
      2.  pH
      3.  Temperature
      *».  Acidity
      5.  Sulfate
      6.  Iron
                                      66

-------
" CONDUCTIVITY, 1
a, MICROMHOSo u* 1
TY, CONDUCTIVITY, o o o o |

1 CONDUCT!













^


0
n
s
c
e
_>
I
v*
3
3
oe
o
•••













'*"'


2
2
1
1
IOC
9C
8C
7C
6C
5(
4(
3(
2C
1C
•••












,-*•
f


50(
001
'»5 w
00
50
)0
)0
)0
>0
>0
)0
)0
JO
10










1
^
)












L-













I
• *^/













J






















D
D
C

















#<
C3
1















.^"'
,oL-i
F
^•^^^•B















^










K













Ty>






80















to

^f^

101













<;
X











^













^





•







fj














^j














f^"












Of
c














•» r
\**
*;












14














i-
r^













_^














^








^







-<«








»"^







^x--







. ^









Jj CS







BIG FOUR CREEK
SAMPLE POINT WO














II 1
120 160 200 240 280
, ACIDITY, MG/L

















^


3














l^s)


20
IGURE 4
lMBB«H^>Bi













2i/«Vx
^£P*
^
	

20




-




(

s
^








^



yfi
w Ol
v x--






0
A








(
>

•^












^v —
Vi/^J^










3C
C 1 D 1 T1







<
?
^^













^**~
^^










£
WX^
a ^"











^^
r i










^
^^'
^
J
P

























UPPER SANDY RUN
SAMPLE POINT 320
10
r. MG/
1 	

_L


i G
J >^
> a^
X?
F I
"
I






~^
i
4(
L





^^J






)0



a

	






5(


>
'









,x










)0
x^











LOWER SANDY RUN
SAMPLE POINT 310


















1
vy














1 	


















500
p















r














320
















H0 60 80 100 120 140 160
ACIDITY, MG/L
- CONDUCTIVITY VS ACID CONTENT
'
67

-------
                       PART  I I I  -  DATA  DEVELOPMENT

Ana1ytlea 1 Methods
     Samples taken at two-week  intervals  by  the  United States Geological
Survey were analyzed by  standard procedures.
     All samples  taken by  Stanley  Consultants were  analyzed  either  in a field
laboratory set  up in  the Nature Center  of Lake Hope State  Park or at facilities
of Ohio  University  in Athens.   Temperature measurements were made at the time
samples  were taken.   Other analyses were made within several hours  after
sample collection.
     Procedures used  in  analysis of samples  collected by Stanley Consultants
are  as follows:
      1.  pH was determined by an electric pH meter, standardized on each
         day of use with buffer solutions of pH  = 4.0 and  pH = 7.0.
     2.  Acidity  was  determined by titration with 0.02N, sodium hydroxide
          to the phenolphthalein end point (pH =  8.3).  This  end point
         was checked  during the test on some samples by means of the pH
         meter.  Sample  preparation included addition of four drops of
         30 percent hydrogen peroxide followed by boiling  for two minutes
         with subsequent cooling to room temperature before  titration.
         This procedure  accelerates oxidation of iron to the ferric form.
         By cooling prior  to titration, the  interference from magnesium
         and aluminum encountered  with  titration at the elevated temperature
          is minimized.   The technique used is essentially  the same  as
         Method 2 described by  Payne and  Yeates  in  "The Effects of  Magnesium
         on Acidity Determination  of Mine Drainage," (Third  Symposium on
         Coal Mine Research -  1970). The end point of 8.3 was selected in
         the interest of standardization. Titration to a  lower pH  end point
         may have been desirable.   However,  titration curves are presented
         later  herein which illustrate  the difference in acidity measured
         to other end points.
                                      69

-------
     3.   Iron  concentration was  determined  by  a  colorimetric  technique
         using 1,  10  -  phenanthroline  to  produce a  color  related  to
         concentration.  The colorimeter used was equipped with a filter
         to provide  light  at  a wavelength of 510 millimicrons.  A
         commercial  reagent marketed as Ferro  Ver was  used.   This method
         is in essential agreement with Standard Methods,  12th  Edition,
         page  156.
     k.   Sulfate was  determined  by a turbidimetric  method  based on
         precipitation  of  the sulfate  ion in an  acid media with barium
         chloride.   Silica was present at a concentration  below the
         interference level of 500 mg/1.  The  colorimeter  used  in this
         determination  was equipped with  a  filter to produce  light  at a
         wavelength  of  420 millimicrons.  A commercial  preparation,
         Sulfa Ver III,  was used.  This method is in essential  compliance
         with  that shown in Standard Methods,  12th  Edition, page  291.
Analytical  Data
     A detailed tabulation of flow and chemical  data  is shown in  Appendix  A.
This table  is  a computer printout  in which  all flows are  converted  to
gallons  per minute.   The weight  of each constituent in pounds per day  is
computed for those instances  where both a flow and  concentration  are
available.
     Data shown is as follows:
     1.   The first column  indicates  the date.   The  designation  052870
         is May 28,  1970.
     2.   The second  column indicates sample location.   The location of
         sample points  other  than  mine openings  are shown  on  Figure 1
         and Figure  3-
                                    70

-------
          Samples are designated as follows:
          Number                        Location
          200-299 (*)              Lake Hope
          300-399                  Sandy Run - Main Stem
          **99                      Big Four Creek
          500-699                  Mine Openings (by addition of 500 to
                                     opening on Figure 3)
          700-799                  Small Streams tributary to Sandy Run
                                   Small Streams and refuse drainage tributary
                                     to Sandy Run
          800-899                  Streams and refuse drainage tributary  to
                                     Big Four Creek

            (*)                    Samples A through E from the lake are
                                     special samples.
     3.  The third  column  indicates  the source of  data and the sample
         number  taken on that  day.   The  letter "G" indicates  data by USGS.
         The letter "S"  indicates  data  collected by  Stanley Consultants.
         The "S2" indicates  the  data  is from  the second  sample by Stanley
         Consultants on  that day.
     k.  Flow  shown  in column  4  is  in gallons per  minute.  Data from USGS
         in cubic feet per second  has been  converted.
     5-  Temperatures shown  are  in degrees  Fahrenheit.
     6.  Concentrations  shown  are  as  follows:
               Acidity               mg per  liter as CaCO,
               Iron                  mg per  liter as Fe
               Sulfate               mg per  liter as CaCO_
     7.  Data  in columns 8,  10 and 12 show  pounds  per day of  the respective
         const ituents.
     8.  All other  data  can  be interpreted  from column headings.
     9.  The use of  an asterisk  (*)  indicates that data  is not available
         or could not be computed  from available data.
     Table 1 is a compilation  of chemical analysis made  during July, 1971
at various locations on  Lake Hope.  A sample was taken from the surface and
from the bottom of  the lake  at each  point.  The  location of these  sample
points is shown on  Figure 1.
                                       71

-------
                                 TABLE 1
                         SAMPLES FROM LAKE HOPE

                                                                  Dissolved
                        Depth       jpH_      Temperature   H^S_       Oxygen
                         (ft)                   (C)       (mg/1)      (mg/1)
Surface Samples
     A                    -        3.75         2k        -0.1         8.0
     B                    -        4.1          2?                    8.0
     C                    -        4.1          27                    8.0
     D                    -        4.1          27                    8.0
     E                    -        4.1          27                    8.0
Bottom Samples
     A
     B
     C
     D
     E
 Interpretation of Test Results
     The main thrust of corrective actions necessary to control the influence
of acid mine drainage is aimed at acidity control.  With this factor corrected,
the iron content of such drainage would automatically be controlled.  With the
pH of the water near the neutral  point, and adequate natural  aeration, iron
will be precipitated as ferric hydroxide.  The sulfate content of the water,
particularly that coming from some mine openings, is quite high.  However,
concentration in the water from Sandy Run entering the lake has ranged from
65 to 450 mg/1.   This in itself would pose no particular problem assuming
that the sulfate anion were associated with a cation other than hydrogen.
Nevertheless, any corrective action controlling acid entry into the lake,
except neutralization, will also control the quantity of sulfate.
3
10
20
6
18
3-75
4.5
4.5
4.3
4.5
24
27
23
27
24
-0.1
-0.1
-0.1
-0.1
-0.1
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
                                       72

-------
     An attempt  has  been  made to correlate weight flow of  acid with  stream
flow at several  points.   Figure 5 shows the relationship of  acid weight
per day versus stream  flow based on data taken at the original USGS  gaging
station (Sample  Point  No.  310)  located on the main stem of Sandy Run.  A
curve  indicating  the apparent relationship between these parameters  has
been added, however, deviations are quite large.   This is  undoubtedly due
to the prior history of  precipitation and drainage flow.   Likewise,  a
similar correlation  has  been attempted for the flow from Mine Opening No.
4? (Sample  Point  No. 5^7), which is the single largest source of acid mine
drainage.   Data  presented on Figure 6 shows significant deviations from
the apparent best fit  of  the curve.  Such deviations  indicate that the
weight of the acid produced is  a function of factors  other than flow.
     Recognizing  that  the oxidation of the iron sulfides is  to some extent
a time dependent  reaction,  increased flows,  after a  long dry period, would
tend to dissolve  and remove more acidic materials  than a similar flow after
a previous  rainy  period.
     Stream flow  measured at Sample Point No.  310 and rainfall data  are shown
on Figure 7 along with conductivity.
     The quantity of acid in a  stream reported herein  is based on titration
of a sample with  standardized reagent to an  end point  of pH = 8.3.   To
correct acidity of flow going to the lake,  an  increase  in  pH to the  range
of 6.5 to 7.0 would  be adequate.  Therefore,  the  computed  acid quantities
could have been determined  on the basis  of  sample  neutralization to the
end point of pH = 7-0.  To characterize the  difference  between titration
to these end points, a series of titration  curves  were  prepared.   Typical
curves are shown  on  Figure 8.   While the configuration  of  titration curves
will  change, even for  samples collected  at  different  times from the  same
source, those shown  are generally representative.
     The difference  in acidity  due  to titration to different end points can
be illustrated by data from Figure  8.
                                     73

-------
 ACID
1000 IBS.
 PER DAY
                ©
                  ©
                ©(
            00.
           '©
                             ©
 ACID
1000 LBS.
 PER DAY
                                                    7     8
                             FLOW, 1000 GPM
                   FIGURE  5 - ACIDITY  VS FLOW
                               SANDY  RUN  -
                               SAMPLE POINT  310
                                  74

-------
LU

O.


co
CQ
O
o
o
























/
0






















,
p





















(
T/

























5
1$
©

















©,
/






















y
i
7 	






















'
fi
G)





















^























/
©




















0

X

s




















\
5/







































•.






©

^
©






















X

G






























































<







X























x
























X























x

















100 200 300 W
FLOW, GPM
  o


  oc.
  LU
O Q-


O CO
                                                         o
                                                         o
                                                         o
             FIGURE 6 - ACIDITY VS FLOW
                         SAMPLE POINT  547
                              75

-------
LU
3:
o
    0.5
    1.0
oc
I—
oo
                        12     16    20

                           APRIL 1971
28
      FIGURE 7 - FLOW,  RAINFALL AND CONDUCTIVITY  -
                  SAMPLE POINT  310
                               76

-------
pH
IU
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
310
320
547























X
^310

•^^•^M
i^M^


•3SS











s\















320
*^

^^










X



^








/



.XV
^
547









p

/
/
/
/






,
y
^








AMP
OIN
10



SAW
POI
320
^






L£-
T




PLE
NT/








, 	



I


SAMPL
-POINT
547
/
/
hr 	

/t
\!
*














^
/












E














0 234567
02 4 6 8 10 12 14
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
0.02N NaOH, ML
                                                    10
PH
             ALL BASED OH 50 ML SAMPLES
            FIGURE  8 - TITRATION  CURVES
                              77

-------
     For Sample Point No. 5^*7 with titration to an end point of pH = 8.3,
59 ml of 0.02N sodium hydroxide is required.  This is equivalent to an acid
concentration of 1,180 mg/1 expressed as calcium carbonate.   Titration to an
end point of pH = 7.0 requires only 55 ml  of sodium hydroxide which is equiv-
alent to an acid concentration of 1,100 mg/1.  The acid concentration repre-
sented by the difference between the titration end points is less than 7-percent.
     For Sample Point No. 310 titration to pH - 8.3 requires k.3 ml of sodium
hydroxide while titration to pH = 7.0 requires only 3-6 ml.   These are
equivalent to acid concentrations of 86 mg/1 and 72 mg/1.  The difference
in this instance is slightly more than 16  percent.
Analysis of Lake Bottom Muds
     Bottom samples were taken at various  lake locations representing
potentially different biological environments.  These sites  are as follows:
     A.  Near the point where Sandy Run enters the lake.
     B.  A point on the opposite side of the lake which receives drainage
         from an area free of acid mine water drainage.
     C.  Near the dam at the lower end of  the lake.
     D.  A small cove opposite the boat dock.
     E.  A point near the widest and possibly the deepest part of the Lake.
These locations are shown on Figure 1.
     The survey of Lake Hope revealed a scarcity of benthic  fauna when
compared to Tycoon Lake  in Gallia County, Lake Catherine  in Jackson County
and  similar aquatic ecosystems  in the  same geographic area which  lack
acid mine drainage.
     The relative abundance of organisms found at the different sampling
sites  is shown  in Table 2.  The greatest abundance and widest diversity of
species were found at Site D.  Chironomid (midge) larvae were the most
abundant organisms at all sites.  These larvae are capable of living  in an
extremely polluted environment.  On the other hand, dragon flies, a group
usually quite abundant when water is near the neutral point are  rare  in
this lake.
     While some resistent species of fish can survive  in water of low pH for
long periods, direct tolerance to low  pH water by desirable species  is only
a part of the problem in  lake management.   Also,  to be considered is  the effect
of low pH on the entire biota as  it effects  the complete  food chain of the
ecosystems.

                                     78

-------
                                 TABLE 2

              RELATIVE ABUNDANCE OF BOTTOM ORGANISMS FOUND
Coleoptera (Settles)
     Dyti ci dae                         xx              xx      xx
     (larvae & adults)
     Gyrinidae                         x               xxx     x
     (larvae & adults)

Diptera  (Flies)
     Chaoborus (larvae)                        xxx     xxx     xx      xx
     Chi ronomids  (larvae)              xxx     xxx     xxx     xxx     xx

Megaloptera
     Sialis  (Alderfly)                 x

Odonata  -  dragonflies/damaelf1 ies  (Naiads)
     Coenagrion                                xx      x       xx      x
     Ishnura                                   x       x
     Gomphus                                   x               xx
     Macromia                                  x       x
     Libellulidae                             xxx     xx      xx
     unidentified                             x

Trichoptera  (caddisf1ies)
     Hydropsyche                                               x

Hemiptera
     Corix?dae (water boatman)         xx              x       xxx     x
     Nlptonectidae                     X
        (backswimmer)

Oligochaeta                            xx      xx              x
   (earthworms)
                                                               u
Nematoda                              x
   (roundworms)

Crustacea                                              xxx     xx      xx
     Crayfish


     x = only  one or two per sample

     xx = smal 1 numbers

    xxx = abundant in sample
Samples were obtained using (Eckmann)  Dredge and  dip  nets.
                                      79

-------
Mechanisms of Acid Formation
     The source of both iron and sulfur in acid mine drainage is the iron
sulfides found in the overburden and material  adjacent to the coal  seams.
While other forms of iron and sulfide compounds may be present, the most
common materials are pyrite and marcasite.  Contact of this material with
air and water produces sulfuric acid and the iron sulfates.
     A detailed description of the oxidation processes are available from
a number of sources, however, they are described briefly below:
     (1)  2 FeS2 + 7 02 + 2 H20    - +*  2  FeSO^ + 2  h^SO^
     If sufficient dissolved oxygen is present, the ferrous sulfate is
     oxidized to ferric sulfate:
     (2)  k FeSO^ + 02 + 2 H^   - *-  2  Fe^SO^  + 2 hy)
     If the pH of the solution is low, this oxidation takes place very
     slowly.  Hydrolysis of the ferric sulfate in water  can take place
     producing ferric hydroxide and sulfuric acid.
     (3)  Fe2(S04)3 +6  H20         - +•  2 Fe(OH)3 + HgSO
     This latter reaction requires a pH of 5.5 or higher to progress  at a
     significant rate.
     In the samples taken at Lake Hope, all  were relatively clear indicating
that any products of reaction (3)were deposited within the mine area.  It
should be emphasized that the above equations are useful for illustrating
acidity production  in the acid mine drainage.  However, more complex
mechanisms are undoubtedly  involved.   In some instances, bacteria have
been reported to catalyze the oxidation reaction.
     The total acid content represents the sulfuric acid formed directly
as well as that formed by the hydrolysis of the ferric hydroxide and ferrous
hydroxide.  In the analytical tests, the ferrous hydroxide  is oxidized
to ferric hydroxide to simulate oxidation which would occur naturally if the
pH of the acid mine drainage were increased to 8.3.
                                     80

-------
Natural Corrective  Factors
     There are several  natural  environmental  factors  which  tend  to neutralize
the acidity formed  and  precipitate the iron.   Two of  these  factors deserve
particular mention:
     1.  The normal  buffering  action of other ground  and  surface waters when
         mixed with the acid mine drainage water.
     2.  The sulfate-sulfide biochemical  reaction which would produce the
         divalent sulfide  ion.
     The buffering  action  of natural waters is due to the alkalinity present
 in the form of the  bicarbonate ion.   When the pH  of the final mixture is
 less than 6.0, this can best be represented by the following equation:
     (k)  Ca(HCO )   + H.SO,      	+•     CaSO,  + 2 H n  + 2 CO,,
                j £-     *•   "                     4      Z        2
     The anerobic production of the  sulfide ion is  described by Decker and
          *
     King.   A simplified equation is as  follows:
     (5)  H2SOI( + C (Organic)     	+-     H2$ +  H20 + C02
     The organic carbon  in the  above equation  can  be  in the form of vegetation
degradation products or similar materials.   In this anaerobic reaction,  a part
of the hydrogen sulfide formed  escapes  to the  atmosphere,  while another  part
reacts  with iron present and precipitates as an insoluble  iron  sulfide.
The environment required for such  a  reaction  is normally  that of a deep  lake
wherein stratification occurs.  Without mixing the  hypoliminon  provides  a
desirable substrate
     Undoubtedly the effect of  acid  mine  drainage on Lake Hope  has been
tempered by the buffering  action  of  other ground and  surface waters.   More
than half of the total watershed  consists of  land  which does not contribute
acidic runoff.  Therefore, a significant  quantity  of water containing at
least a small amount of alkalinity will mix with  the  acid mine drainage in
Lake Hope.
     Buffering action can  be illustrated  by reference to  Figure 9-  Titration
curves represent equivalent acid  (or alkalinity) at various pH levels.  When
titrating solutions  are of the  same  normality, curve  intersection points
represent the pH which would be obtained  by mixing  the designated quantity

*  Decker and King, "Accelerated  Recovery of Acid Strip Mine Lakes,"
   26th Purdue  Industrial  Waste Conference (May,  1971)
                                      81

-------
       10
PH
                  O.Q2N
                  TITRATIG SOLUTION
                                                     10
PH
         0      10     20     30     40     50     60

                     TITRATING SOLUTION,  ML
   A  50 ML SAMPLE - SANDY RUN ABOVE MINE OPENINGS (SAMPLE POINT NO. 380)
   B  50 ML SAMPLE - SAMPLE POINT NO. 547
   C  SAME AS "A" EXCEPT 250 ML SAMPLE
    FIGURE  9  -  EFFECT  OF  MIXING  MINE DRAINAGE
                  WITH STREAM WATER
                              82

-------
of acid mine drainage with  a  designated volume of water which  contains
alkalinity  in  the  form of the bicarbonate ion.
     The  intersection of Curve A with Curve B shows  that if  equal quantities
of water  from  Sample Point  No. 5^7 and from Sample Point No. 380 were mixed,
the resulting  pH would be 3.7-  The intersection of  Curve C  with Curve B
indicates that when  water from Sample Point No.  380  and Sample Point No.
547 are mixed  at a ratio of 5:1, the resulting pH will  be 4.35.
      In the case of  the sulfate-sulfide biochemical  reaction,  it appears
that the  depth of  Lake Hope and other environmental  factors  are not
optimum.  This is  borne out by the high dissolved oxygen concentration
throughout  the lake  at all  depths, as well  as the absence of the sulfide
ions from all  lake samples.  The environment is  aerobic rather than
anaerobic.
Extent of Correction Required
     Based on  a series of 18  separate samples taken  between  May, 1970, and
April, 1971, the pH  of Lake Hope measured at the dam spillway  varied from
3.0 to 6.0.  During  this same period, the acidity based on titration to a
pH of 8.3 varied from 8 to  72 mg/1 with an  average concentration of 31 mg/1.
     The  lake  as  initially  constructed consisted of  126 acres  with a total
estimated volume of  1,500 acre-feet.   Some  silting of the lake has occurred.
In the fall of 1970  approximately 15 acre-feet of material was  removed by
dredging.  A net volume reduction due to silting equivalent  to 250 acre-feet
has occurred since construction 22 years ago.  Present  storage volume of
the lake  is estimated at 410  million gallons.
     With an average acidity  concentration  of 31  mg/1 the total acid content
of the lake is about 105,000  pounds.   This  can be expressed  by another
means.  Using  hydrated lime of approximately 93  percent purity, it would
take about 83,500  pounds of lime to neutralize the acidity of  the lake to a
pH equal  to 8.3 or about 40 tons of lime would be sufficient to increase the
pH of the lake to  7-0.  This  is not offered as a suggested means of control-
ling acidity,  but  rather as an alternate quantitative means  of expressing lake
acidity.
     Based on  average flow  into the lake from Sandy  Run of 6.0 cfs and an
average of flow-acid relationship shown on  Figure 5,  annual  acid flow is
about 625,000  pounds.
                                     83

-------
     Random samples were checked for sixteen days during May, 1970; June,
1970; March, 1971;  and April, 1971.  Twelve of these indicated more acid was
produced from Mine Opening No, 47  (Sample Point No. 547) than was measured
at Sample Point No. 310.  Although Sample Point No. 310 is upstream on'
Sandy Run a short distance from the Lake, composition of the water at that
point is close to that of water entering the lake.   The above data represents
daily flows at Point No. 310 up to 15 cfs (6,750 gpm).   This  indicates that
acid flow from Mine Opening No. 47 is undoubtedly the largest single source
of acid mine drainage.
     In most instances the sum of acid  content  of streams  at  Sample Point
No. 320 and Sample Point No. 420 is more than that  at Sample Point No. 310.
     Both of the situations illustrates the entry of spring water or runoff
into the main stream with the alkalinity of these waters exerting a buffer-
ing action.
     Unfortunately it has not been possible to measure  flow from mine openings
at the time of high stream flows to correlate with  stream acidity.  However,
it appears from data collected that acid from Mine  Opening No. 47 during such
periods is a much smaller part of total acid produced.
     It is recognized that many mine openings are interconnected and that
sealing one would not completely arrest flow.  Sealing  openings  as required
to stop flow now produced by Opening No. 47 would solve a great  portion of
the total  problem.
Methods of Reducing Acid Input to the Lake
     Reduction of acid entering Lake Hope from Sandy Run must be of a
magnitude such that the lake pH is maintained at 6.5 or higher.
     A three-part program for acid mine drainage is proposed;
     1.   Refuse removal or covering.
     2.   Sealing of those mine openings which are the major producers
         of acid drainage.
     3-   Sealing of certain other mines which do not currently produce
         acid drainage or produce only  a small  amount.
                                     84

-------
     The location and  relative  area of the refuse  piles  are shown on Figure 3.
Due to the wide dispersion  and  heterogeneous nature  of the exposed coal refuse,
definitive quantification of  the  total  acid contribution from  this source has
not been obtained.
     During dry periods  contribution is essentially  nil  and acid flow  is
generally all  from  two or  three mine openings.   During heavy precipitation
periods  refuse pile contributions increases in  significance.
      Implementing an abatement  program to evaluate benefits would follow
th?s pattern:
      1.  Excavate and remove refuse piles.  An  alternate approach would
         be to provide a sealing cover to some  refuse  piles such as that
         in Honeycomb Hollow.
     2.  Seal  Mine  Opening  No.  kj as well  as those connected with it
         which would provide an alternate path  for drainage flow.
     3-  Seal  other major  mine  drainage contributors such as Mine
         Opening No.  89, if they are not linked directly with Mine
         Opening No.  kj.  Follow this with a short surveillance program.
      k.  Seal  other mine openings as required.
 Future  Data  Collection
      !t  is  necessary that  data output from monitoring  stations be continued
 to be  tabulated  and analyzed.  This information includes stream stage  (flow),
 pH,  specific  conductance,  dissolved oxygen and  temperature.  Likewise
 chemical data from  the samples  obtained at each of these three monitoring
 stations should  be  analyzed at  normal two-week  intervals.
      All of  this  data should be collected at least through the period when
 the  abatement program is implemented.  In addition,  samples should be
 collected  from the  lake and analyzed not less frequently than  every two-
weeks.
                                      85

-------
     The total  of this  data should meet most of the testing requirements
and provide a measure of the abatement programs success.   It can be used
also to determine the effect of each  step  of the  program.
     Some supplemental  tests will  be  required but these  can best be defined
as implementation of the program progresses.

                                   Respectfully submitted,

                                   STANLEY CONSULTANTS
                                   Approved
                                               L. G. Koehrsen
                                     86

-------
RUN DATE 021572
                                 APPEND(X A
                       LAKE HOPE SURVEILANCE PROGRAM
                            WATER QUALITY DATA
SAMPLE
DATE POINT
052070
052170
060370
060370
060470
062370
030671
031171
031371
031771
032071
032371
032671
033071
040371
040771
041071
041471
042471
042971
050171
050371
050571
050871
051571
052371
060271
050670
050770
050670
050770
052070
052170
060370
060370
060470
040771
041071
041471
042171
042471
042971
050171
050371
050571
050871
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
210
210
300
300
300
300
300
300
300
300
300
300
300
300
300
300
300
300
300
FLOW
NO GPM
SI
SI
SI
S2
SI
SI
SI
SI
SI
SI
SI
SI
SI
SI
SI
SI
SI
SI
SI
SI
SI
SI
SI
SI
SI
SI
SI
SI
SI
SI
SI
SI
SI
SI
S2
SI
SI
SI
SI
SI
SI
SI
SI
SI
SI
SI
ft
ft
ft
ft
ft
ft
ft
ft
ft
ft
ft
ft
ft
ft
ft
ft
ft
ft
*
ft
ft
ft
#
ft
ft
ft
5
ft
ft
ft
ft
ft
ft
ft
ft
ft
ft
ft
ft
ft
ft
ft
ft
ft
ft
ft
TEMP
72
70
62
62
62
ft
42
40
42
45
42
43
46
48
50
50
67
56
60
55
64
53
56
61
65
72
73
60
58
60
58
72
70
62
62
62
50
64
56
60
58
51
59
49
51
58
PH
4.0
4.1
3.9
3.9
3.5
4.6
5.8
5.1
5.1
4.6
3.0
3.4
4.0
6.0
4.4
4.3
4.5
4.3
6.0
6.0
6.5
7.8
6.2
4.5
4.7
5.0
5.2
4.0
4.0
4.1
4.0
3.6
3.6
3.4
3.5
3.5
3.1
3.5
3.2
3.4
3.8
#
4.0
4.3
4.4
5.5
ACIDITY IRON SULFATE
MG/L LB/D MG/L LB/D MG/L LB/D
72
72
38
40
30
10
15
8
10
12
60
24
24
30
26
24
30
34
34
*
52
30
36
28
30
14
22
60
100
48
80
106
106
94
100
90
68
7?.
106
156
108
*
114
84
64
32
#
*
ft
»
*
ft
#
ft
*
ft
#
#
ft
*
ft
*
ft
ft
ft
#
*
*
ft
ft
*
ft
#
*
ft
ft
*
ft
ft
ft
#
*
ft
ft
*
*
*
#
#
*
ft
.9
.9
.2
.2
.2
.2
15.0
10.0
16.0
1.0
5.0
9.0
6.0
3.0
2.0
1.0
3.0
10.0
3«0
6.0
5.0
5.0
2.0
1.0
.5
2.0
3.0
2.7
2.8
.5
.5
.5
.5
3.0
3.0
3.0
5.0
3.0
6.0
6.0
8.0
6.0
9.0
7.0
1.0
125.0
ft
ft
«
ft
*
ft
*
#
#
*
#
«
»
«
*
#
*
#
ft
ft
ft
#
*
#
*
#
*
ft
#
*
*
*
#
ft
*
*
#
#
ft
ft
ft
*
#
ft
225
225
700
700
640
80
55
168
338
72
10
100
75
25
75
25
100
100
75
25
50
25
75
25
78
75
60
100
98
75
75
60
60
250
250
250
50
55
175
• ^ ^
125
150
100
1 C
15
50
75
25

*
*
ft
*
#
*
*
ft
#
ft
*
*
*
ft
*
*
ft
*
*
ft
#
*
ft
ft
ft
#
*
ft
ft
*
*
ft
ft
ft
#
*
#
#
*
#
ft
#
#
                                      87

-------
                      LAKE HOPE SURVEILANCE PROGRAM
                           WATER QUALITY DATA
RUN DATE 021572
SAMPLE
DATE POINT
051571
052371
060271
040170
041570
042870
051270
052070
052170
052670
060370
060370
060470
061170
062370
06237Q
071070
072170
080370
081870
083170
091570
092970
101670
102770
110970
112770
120870
12217U
010671
012271
020571
030671
031171
031371
031571
031771
032071
032371
032671
032971
033071
040371
040771
041071
041^-71
300
300
300
310
310
310
310
310
310
310
310
310
310
310
310
310
310
310
310
310
310
310
310
310
310
310
310
310
310
310
310
310
310
310
310
310
310
310
310
310
310
310
310
310
310
310
NO
SI
SI
SI
Gl
Gl
Gl
Gl
SI
SI
Gl
SI
S2
SI
Gl
Gl
Sl^
Gl
Gl
Gl
Gl
Gl
Gl
Gl
Gl
Gl
Gl
Gl
Gl
Gl
Gl
Gl
Gl
SI
SI
SI
Gl
SI
SI
SI
SI
Gl
SI
SI
SI
SI
SI
FLOW
GPM
#
«•
*
5654.8
1323.9
22978.5
1669.5
#
*
6058.8
*
*
*
233.3
89.7
*
718.0
112.2
*
224.4
67.3
242.3
237.8
*
*
583.4
493fa.3
*
4039.2
*
1525.9
27825.6
*
*
*
8976.0
*
*
*
*
1122.0
#
*
#
*
#
TEMP
64
65
74
44
56
61
63
72
70
64
62
62
62
73
62
*
64
67
69
73
72
12
55
55
*
52
46
36
41
35
35
33
42
40
46
*
41
38
39
44
47
46
50
52
63
56
PH
5.3
4.5
4.4
3.7
3.6
4.2
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.8
3.2
3.2
3.6
3.6
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.5
3.5
3.6
3.6
3.4
3.4
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.7
3.6
4.7
2.6
3.9
3.9
4.0
3.8
3.7
2.9
3.0
3.6
3.2
3.8
3.8
3.2
3.0
ACI
MG/L
38
66
78
40
70
15
79
232
112
40
38
40
128
79
89
93
79
99
-'9
6G
79
15*
14^
99
109
99
79
89
69
40
60
20
100
3*
23
35
38
40
52
72
60
76
76
96
169
116
DITY
LB/D
*
*
*
271*
1112
4136
1583
*
*
2908
*
#
*
221
96
*
681
133
*
162
64
448
411
*
*
693
4630
#
3344
#
1099
6678
*
*
*
3770
*
*
*
*
808
*
*
*
*
*
IRON
MG/L LB/D
2.0
3.0
14.0
3.7
3.9
1.3
2.8
.9
.7
2.6
2.7
2.8
3.3
2.2
1.7
2.2
3.4
4.3
.0
2.2
2.0
2.8
5.4
33.0
2.8
4.1
4.2
5.4
.6
4.2
5.2
1.2
10.0
7.0
8.0
1.5
4.0
3.0
16.0
7.0
4.0
8.0
2.0
1.0
5.0
11.0
jt
if
*
251
62
358
56
*
#
189
*
#
*
6
2
#
29
6
*
6
2
8
15
*
*
29
249
#
29
#
95
401
*
*
*
162
*
*
*
#
54
#
*
*
*
*
SULFATE
MG/L LB/D
1*0
100
75
121
163
66
212
93
95
123
300
300
300
2*3
302
300
222
298
236
208
276
427
441
291
322
? 18
229
270
177
125
166
57
125
96
188
102
96
125
100
75
16f>
100
75
100
125
150
#
*
*
8211
2590
18199
4247
#
#
8943
#
*
*
681
325
*
1913
401
*
560
223
1242
1259
*
*
1526
13566
*
8579
*
3040
19033
*
*
*
10987
*
*
#
#
2235
*
*
#
*
*
                                     88

-------
RUN DATE 021572
                      LAKE  HOPE  SURVE1LANCE  PROGRAM
                            WATER QUALITY DATA
SAMPLE
DATE POINT
041571
042471
042771
042971
050171
050371
050571
050871
051471
051571
052371
052771
060271
061071
070971
072271
080471
081871
083171
091771
093071
101471
102971
110971
112271
120771
122071
011072
011972
040170
041570
042870
04287C
050670
050770
051270
05207C
052170
052670
060370
060370
060470
061170
062370
062370
071070
310
310
310
310
310
310
310
310
310
310
310
310
310
310
310
310
310
310
310
310
310
310
310
310
310
310
310
310
310
320
320
320
320
320
320
320
320
320
320
320
320
320
320
320
320
320
NO
Gl
SI
Gl
SI
SI
SI
SI
SI
Gl
SI
SI
Gl
SI
Gl
Gl
Gl
Gl
Gl
Gl
Gl
Gl
Gl
Gl
Gl
Gl
Gl
Gl
Gl
Gl
Gl
Gl
Gl
SI
SI
SI
Gl
SI
SI
Gl
SI
52
SI
Gl
Gl
SI
Gl
FLOW
GPM
628.3
*
350.0
*
*
*
*
*
4936.8
*
*
628.3
#
493.6
22.4
22.4
13464*0
31.4
44.8
67.3
89.7
44.8
40.3
35.9
58.3
13912.3
1301.5
5385.6
807.8
1000.8
363.5
4438.0
*
*
*
291.7
#
*
1382.3
*
*
#
58.3
40.3
*
125.6
TEMP
54
58
52
52
60
46
50
55
54
62
64
56
68
*
73
66
64
72
70
64
66
54
55
36
35
49
39
43
33
45
64
59
*
60
58
63
72
70
62
62
62
62
73
61
*
64
PH
3.6
4.1
3.5
3.8
4.0
3.6
3.7
4.4
3.9
4.4
4.5
3.6
4. 4
3.8
3.7
3.8
4.5
3.7
3.6
3.6
3.6
3.7
3.7
3.7
3.7
4.2
3.4
4.2
3.7
3.2
3.0
4.0
3.7
3.3
3.3
3.2
3.2
3.2
3.3
2.9
2.9
2.9
2.8
2.8
2.9
2.9
AC I
MG/L
99
lie
70
•*
ii^
80
86
42
30
54
82
5
82
60
55
65
15
55
79
109
144
114
228
179
184
30
89
30
119
109
179
30
56
250
300
124
353
234
84
460
1610
460
452
47
525
278
DITY
LB/D
746
#
294
*
#
*
#
*
1777
*
*
38
*
355
15
18
2424
21
43
88
155
61
111
77
129
5009
1390
1939
1154
1309
781
1616
*
*
#
434
#
*
1393
*
#
#
316
23
#
419
IRON
MG/L LB/D
3.0
4.0
2.8
£, r\
w • v
3.0
9.0
1.0
2.0
3. fl
625.0
4.0
1.7
14.0
1.4
1.5
3.2
1.1
2.4
27.0
6.0
3.0
2.8
4.3
4.6
4.7
1.5
5.5
2.0
3.9
18.0
26.0
4.7
4.5
35.0
45.0
19.0
35.0
40.0
11.0
35.0
40.0
30.0
60.0
76.0
50.0
37.0
23
#
12
*
*
*
#
#
225
*
#
13
#
8
*
1
178
1
15
5
3
2
2
2
3
250
86
129
38
216
113
253
*
#
#
67
*
*
182
*
#
*
42
37
#
56
SULFATE
MG/L L3/D
208
150
229
100
100
75
75
50
114
125
150
177
100
208
198
250
88
250
322
406
510
437
655
645
645
125
281
114
218
26C
422
94
160
400
360
335
300
300
235
550
650
f /S f\
500
1071
1435
•fc
707
1568
#
962
*
•M-
*
#
*
6754
*
*
1335
#
1232
53
.67
14218
94
173
328
549
235
317
278
452
20869
4389
7368
2113
3123
1841
5062
*
#
#
1173
*
*
3898
*
*
*•
750
696
#
1066
                                      89

-------
                      LAKE HOPE SURVEILANCE PROGRAM
                           WATER QUALITY DATA
RUN DATE 021572
SAMPLE
DATE POINT
072170
080370
081870
083170
091570
092970
101670
102770
11097C
112770
120S7C
122170
010671
012271
020571
030671
031171
031371
031571
031771
032071
032371
032671
032971
033071
040371
040771
041071
041471
041571
042471
042771
042971
050171
050371
050571
050871
051471
051571
052371
052771
060271
061071
07C971
072271
080471
320
320
320
320
320
320
320
320
320
320
320
320
320
320
320
320
320
320
320
320
320
320
320
320
320
320
320
320
320
320
320
320
320
320
320
320
320
320
320
320
320
320
320
320
320
320
NO
Cl
Gl
Gl
Gl
Gl
Gl
Gl
Gl
Gl
Gl
Gl
Gl
Gl
Gl
Gl
SI
SI
SI
Gl
SI
SI
SI
SI
Gl
SI
SI
SI
SI
SI
Gl
SI
Gl
SI
SI
SI
SI
SI
Gl
SI
SI
Gl
SI
Gl
Gl
Gl
Gl
FLOW
GPM
22.4
*
35.9
#
67.3
62.3
*
#
130.1
161.5
130.1
718.0
*
332.1
897.6
686.6
1988.1
1377.8
1436.1
866.1
637.3
444.3
350.0
242.3
251.3
273.7
233.3
175.0
161.5
125.6
130.1
80.7
130.1
130.1
390.4
?73.7
1377.8
852.7
753.9
233.3
94.?
103.2
22.4
17.9
17.9
1346.4
TEMP
64
66
70
71
74
55
49
*
49
46
36
41
34
37
33
40
42
49
53
45
41
41
48
46
52
56
55
65
58
64
62
48
49
62
46
51
58
64
62
69
60
66
69
74
63
65
PH
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.8
3.0
2.9
2.9
3.0
3.0
3.2
3.2
3.1
3.3
2.9
4.0
3.3
3.6
3.4
3.3
3.0
3.1
3.0
2.8
3.0
3.3
3.0
2.7
3.0
4.0
3.0
3.2
3.6
3.4
3.5
3.8
3.4
3.7
4.0
2.9
4.1
2.9
2.8
2.9
4.6
ACI
MG/L
596
451
397
645
407
477
238
362
293
256
238
114
104
169
89
150
42
82
69
88
120
140
176
164
188
208
230
256
296
199
304
248
*
286
130
178
98
79
13*
27G
218
414
457
695
596
15
DITY
L8/D
160
#
171
*
329
360
#
*
458
500
372
982
*
674
959
1236
1002
1356
1189
915
918
746
739
477
567
633
644
538
574
300
475
240
*
447
609
585
1620
808
1212
756
247
513
123
150
128
2^2
IRON
MG/L LB/D
69.0
.0
65.0
75.0
36.0
94.0
22.0
51.0
55.0
46.0
52.0
1.8
20.0
31.0
13.0
25.0
15.0
10.0
5.9
8.0
6.0
12.0
7.0
3.7
7.0
8.0
12.0
11.0
13.0
24.0
19.0
47.0
24.0
14.0
7.0
4.0
8.0
8.3
25.0
13.0
32.0
22.0
62.0
74.0
94.0
3.4
19
#
28
*
29
71
*
#
86
89
81
16
#
124
140
206
358
165
102
S3
46
64
29
11
21
26
34
23
25
36
30
46
37
22
33
13
132
85
226
36
36
?7
17
16
20
55
SULFATE
MG/L LB/D
,1300
1061
990
1477
1003
1123
603
874
666
582
603
289
270
406
239
275
120
338
187
223
250
300
325
416
250
350
50C
550
650
520
700
645
575
1025
175
350
75
239
25C
350
562
650
1144
1560
1560
96
•3 K n
-< 3 V
*
427
#
810
847
#
*
1040
1125
942
2490
#
1613
2574
2266
2863
5588
3223
237U
1912
16CO
1365
1210
754
1150
1400
1155
1260
784
1093
625
898
1601
82 C
1150
1T4Q
2446
2262
930
63fc
605
30 >'
33f?
336
1551
                                     90

-------
RUN DATE 021572
                       LAKE  HOPE  SURVEILANCE  PROGRAM
                            WATER QUALITY  DATA
SAMPLE
DATE POINT
081871
083171
091771
093071
101471
102971
110971
112271
120771
122071
011072
011972
062370
062370
062470
031171
031371
031771
032071
032371
032671
033071
040371
040771
041071
041471
042171
042471
042971
050171
050371
050571
050871
051571
052371
060271
040170
041570
042870
042870
050670
050770
051270
052070
052170
052670
320
320
320
320
320
320
320
320
320
320
320
320
370
380
380
380
380
380
380
380
380
380
380
380
380
380
380
380
380
380
380
380
380
380
380
380
420
420
420
420
420
420
420
420
420
420
NO
Gl
Gl
Gl
Gl
Gl
Gl
Gl
Gl
Gl
Gl
Gl
Gl
SI
SI
SI
SI
SI
SI
SI
SI
SI
SI
SI
SI
SI
SI
SI
SI
SI
SI
SI
SI
SI
SI
SI
SI
Gl
Gl
Gl
SI
SI
SI
Gl
SI
SI
Gl
FLOW
GPM
22.4
17.9
22.4
17.9
17.9
17.9
17.9
17.9
2827.4
233.3
897.6
121.1
*
#
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
#
*
*
*
*
*
#
*
*
*
*
*
906.5
242.3
5654.8
*
*
#
287.2
#
*
1700.9
TEMP
64
64
63
68
59
52
38
35
50
41
44
38
#
*
#
40
47
41
42
41
54
43
60
62
67
62
60
66
55
62
52
56
60
68
70
69
45
53
56
*
60
56
63
72
70
63
ACIDITY
PH MG/L LB/D
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.9
2.9
2.8
2.8
4.0
3.2
3.8
3.2
6.3
7.0
7.4
6.2
6.6
6.2
3.7
6.3
5.5
7.0
6.0
6.0
5.6
5.9
5.6
8.0
*
7.2
6.3
6.4
7.7
7.6
5.0
5.6
3.2
3,1
4.2
3.6
3.4
3.3
3.2
3.2
3.2
3.3
645
645
546
596
596
794
645
695
35
104
50
164
*
6
*
4
20
8
26
12
12
18
14
8
*
18
12
6
#
8
6
6
14
8
10
18
89
159
30
50
238
240
129
248
228
70
174
139
147
128
128
171
139
150
1188
291
539
238
*
#
*
*
*
*
*
*
#
*
*
*
*
*
*
#
*
#
*
#
*
#
#
*
968
462
2036
*
*
*
445
#
#
1429
IRON
MG/L LB/D
90.0
93.0
75.0
82.0
83.0
120.0
96.0
120.0
6.4
18.0
6.0
29.0
1.5
.0
.0
5.0
.5
3.0
6.0
9.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
.8
1.5
9.0
2.0
2.0
1.0
2.5
.3
1.0
.2
2.0
2.0
14.0
19.0
2.0
6.0
16.0
20.0
7.8
45.0
45.0
9.0
24
20
20
ie
18
26
21
26
217
50
65
42
#
*
*
#
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
#
*
*
#
*
*
*
*
•*
*
*
*
152
55
136
#
*
*
27
#
*
184
SULFATE
MG/L LB/D
1591
1560
1352
1456
1456
1372
1664
1664
145
354
187
458
125
40
#
156
100
72
100
75
38
38
38
40
39
44
48
44
41
55
38
34
27
38
100
O **i
32
216
343
80
o r»
90
500
480
297
475
500
183
423
336
364
314
314
403
358
358
4920
991
2014
666
*
*
#
*
*
*
*
#
*
*
*
#
#
#
#
*
#
*
#
*
•w-
#
*
2350
998
5429
*
*
1024
#
#
3735
                                      91

-------
                      LAKE HOPE SURVEILANCE PROGRAM
                           WATER QUALITY DATA
RUN DATE 021572
SAMPLE
DATE POINT
060370
060370
060470
06117C
062370
062370
971070
Q'72170
080370
081870
083170
0*1570
092970
101670
102770
110970
112770
120870
122170
010671
012271
020571
030671
031171
031371
031571
031771
032071
032371
032671
032971
033071
d'40371
040771
041071
041471
041571
042471
042771
042971
050171
050371
050571
050871
051471
051571
420
420
420
420
420
420
420
420
420
420
420
420
420
420
420
420
420
420
420
420
420
420
420
420
420
420
420
420
420
420
420
420
420
4?0
420
420
420
420
420
420
420
420
420
420
420
420
NO
SI
S2
SI
Gl
Gl
SI
Gl
Gl
Gl
Gl
Gl
Gl
Gl
Gl
Gl
Gl
Gl
Gl
Gl
Gl
Gl
Gl
SI
SI
SI
Gl
SI
SI
SI
SI
Gl
SI
SI
SI
SI
SI
Gl
SI
Gl
SI
SI
SI
SI
SI
Gl
SI
FLOW
GPM
*
*
*
26.9
26.9
*
94.2
22.4
*
40.3
*
62.8
49.3
*
*
125.6
161.5
103.2
762.9
*
246.8
942.4
637.3
1624.6
1041.2
1032.2
637.3
538.5
390.4
291.7
206.4
201.9
233.3
201.9
143.6
130.1
98.7
103.2
62.8
116.6
103.2
390.4
233.3
1377.8
897.6
637.3
TEMP
62
62
62
76
63
*
64
64
69
70
72
71
55
52
*
50
47
36
41
36
35
33
42
40
49
52
39
37
39
48
49
52
56
55
64
60
55
63
46
50
62
46
50
58
55
62
PH
3.0
3.1
3.0
2.9
3.0
3.0
3.1
2.9
2.9
3.0
2.9
3.0
3.0
3.1
3.0
3.1
3.2
3.2
3.2
3.3
3.2
3.7
2.9
4.8
3.5
3.6
3.4
3.3
2.9
3.0
3.1
2.9
3.1
3.4
2.9
2.7
3.0
3.9
3.0
3.3
3.3
3.4
3.6
4.Q
3.4
4.1
ACI
MG/L
380
420
400
278
27
325
179
372
303
218
422
303
323
144
278
169
124
149
119
84
119
40
75
27
70
55
94
100
126
132
129
16C
152
166
180
216
149
226
204
*
244
102
114
74
70
120
DITY
LB/D
*
*
#
90
9
#
202
100
#
106
#
228
191
*
*
255
240
185
1090
#
352
452
574
526
875
661
719
646
590
462
320
38B
426
402
310
337
177
280
154
*
302
478
319
I22
-------
RUN DATE 021572
                       LAKE HOPE SURVEILANCE PROGRAM
                            WATER QUALITY DATA
SAMPLE
DATE POINT
052371
052771
060271
061071
070971
072271
080471
081871
083171
091771
093071
101471
102971
110971
112271
120771
122071
011072
011972
040170
052070
052170
060370
060370
060470
062470
031171
031371
031771
032071
032371
032671
033071
040371
040771
041071
041471
042171
042471
042971
050171
050371
050571
050871
051571
052371
420
420
420
420
420
420
420
420
420
420
420
420
420
420
420
420
420
420
420
480
480
480
480
480
480
480
480
480
480
480
480
480
480
480
480
480
480
480
480
480
480
480
480
480
480
480
NO
SI
Gl
SI
Gl
Gl
Gl
Gl
Gl
Gl
Gl
Gl
Gl
Gl
Gl
Gl
Gl
Gl
Gl
Gl
Gl
SI
SI
SI
S2
SI
SI
SI
SI
SI
SI
SI
SI
SI
SI
SI
SI
SI
SI
SI
SI
SI
SI
si •
SI
SI
SI
FLOW
GPM
116.6
89.7
103.2
17.9
4.4
13.4
4936.8
8.9
17.9
17.9
17.9
17.9
13.4
13.4
13.4
4443.1
296.2
987.3
170.5
#
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
#
*
*
*
*
#
*
*
*
*
*
*
3040.0
*
*
TEMP
70
64
71
73
77
73
65
68
73
64
78
66
67
39
40
48
42
42
37
46
72
70
62
62
62
*
41
51
39
40
39
47
47
50
55
66
60
55
62
50
64
46
51
59
69
66
PH
3.5
3.0
3.2
2.9
2.8
2.8
4.3
2.8
2.8
2.9
3.0
2.9
2.9
3.0
2.9
4.3
3.2
3.5
3.2
4.1
3.9
3.9
3.8
3.8
3.6
#
4.4
3.7
4.9
4.6
4.5
4.7
3.4
3.8
4.0
3.8
5.2
3.5
4.0
4.0
4.8
4.3
4.9
5»0
5.0
ACI.
MG/L
270
159
342
338
596
467
5
596
417
347
308
367
491
402
432
25
99
59
129
20
95
95
76
42
76
149
22
36
26
40
46
48
68
76
64
160
86
120
108
#
146
62
60
24
50
60
DITY
LB/D
37S
171
424
73
32
75
296
64
90
75
66
79
79
65
70
1333
352
699
264
*
*
*
#
#'
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
#
876
*
*
IRON
MG/L LB/D
13.0
27.0
23.0
43.0
83.0
81.0
2.2
87.0
63.0
42.0
30.0
44.0
52.0
45.0
45.0
2.0
16.0
9.7
20.0
3.9
.5
.5
5.0
5.0
5.0
.0
10.0
19.0
5.0
8.0
17.0
7.0
5.0
7.0
7.0
5.0
6.0
14.0
6.0
9.0
1.0
8 A
.0
3.0
2.5
125.0
10.0
18
29
28
9
4
13
130
9
14
9
6
9
8
7
7
107
57
115
41
*
#
#
*
*
#
*
*
*
#
#
*
*
#
*
#
#
#
#
#
#
91
*
SULFATE
MG/L LB/D
250
395
390
759
1144
946
104
1071
905
811
738
894
1144
967
978
114
302
198
364
102
80
80
250
250
250
*
180
525
72
175
25
100
25
175
175
1 C. f\
150
^ i» A
250
^*v /s /s
300
100
175
-• c
73
100
75
175
75
350
425
483
164
62
153
6161
115
195
175
159
193
185
156
156
6078
1073
2346
745
*
*
#
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
•»
*
*
*
#
*
*
*
*
#
*
*
2736
*
*
                                        93

-------
                      LAKE HOPE SURVEILANCE PROGRAM
                           WATER QUALITY DATA
RUN DATE 021572
SAMPLE
DATE POINT
060271
040170
062470
031171
C31371
031771
032071
032371
032671
033C71
040371
040771
041071
041471
C42171
042471
042971
C5017I
050 371
C50571
050871
051571
052371
C6C271
042970
043 070
050670
05C770
05207C
052170
060370
060370
C6C470
062370
062470
03C571
031171
031371
031771
032071
032371
Q 326 71
032071
D4C371
040771
G41C'7l
480
490
490
490
490
490
490
490
490
490
490
490
490
490
49C
490
490
490
490
490
490
490
490
490
547
547
547
547
547
547
547
547
547
547
547
547
547
547
547
547
547
^7
547
5*7
547
547
NO
SI
Gl
SI
SI
SI
SI
SI
SI
51
SI
SI
SI
SI
SI
Si
SI
SI
SI
SI
SI
SI
SI
SI
SI
SI
51
SI
SI
SI
SI
SI
S2
SI
SI
SI
SI
SI
SI
SI
SI
SI
SI
SI
si
SI
SI
FLOW
GPM
#
*
*
*
#
*
•*
«
«•
#
*
#
•K
*
*
«•
*
*
#
*
4120.0
*
*
*
#
140.0
50.3
50.3
70.2
70.2
41.8
41.8
193.0
27.5
27.5
247.0
276.0
247.0
129.0
183.0
166.0
166.0
129.0
129.1:
114.0
100.0
TEMP
74
45
*
40
46
39
43
39
45
48
53
52
65
56
54
60
50
62
47
51
55
61
72
66
#
*
60
5S
72
70
62
62
62
#
#
48
47
49
48
46
45
46
4?
49
52
60
PH
4.6
7.1
*
6.0
6.5
5.4
5.1
4.8
5.2
3.5
5.5
4.2
7.6
7.0
5.2
5.2
6.8
7.1
6.3
6.0
7.6
7.5
4.5
5.5
2.7
2.8
3.0
3.0
2.8
3.0
2.8
2.8
2.8
3.0
2.6
2.3
3.1
3.1
2.8
2.9
2.3
2.6
2.7
2.6
2.6
2.6
ACI
MG/L
116
#
13
4
4
10
12
8
16
36
14
14
18
14
40
30
*
10
8
10
12
18
14
24
940
950
980
1020
1110
1344
1300
1310
1100
1150
1175
950
692
768
766
792
826
388
812
910
1006
1000
DITY
LB/D
#
*
*
*
*
*
#
#
*
*
#
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
#
593
*
*
*
*
1596
592
616
935
1132
652
657
2548
,379
388
2816
2292
2276
1186
1739
1645
1769
1257
1409
1376
1200
IRON
MG/L LB/D
22tO
.2
• C
10.0
11.0
5.0
7.0
14.0
7.0
6.0
4.0
1.0
1.7
1.3
5.0
1.0
4.5
3.5
2.5
1.5
1.3
.5
2.5
5.0
147.0
.0
40.0
45.0
50.0
50.0
45.0
50.0
40.0
40.0
.0
85.0
80.0
78.0
69.0
67.0
78.0
77.0
67. C
77.0
76.0
125.0
#
#
#
«•
*
*
#
*
*
*
#
*
*
#
*
*
#
*
*
#
64
*
*
#
*
*
24
27
42
42
23
25
93
13
*
252
265
231
107
147
155
153
104
] 19
104
150
SULFATE
MG/L LB/D
100
56
#
108
350
72
75
25
75
70
50
84
89
99
130
110
125
110
93
90
48
70
50
95
2070
#
3000
2880
2650
2650
2500
2500
2500
2500
#
1875
1680
1875
1584
1650
1725
1825
1800
2100
2200
2450
#
*
*
*
#
#
*
*
#
*
*
*
#
#
#
#
*
*
*
*
2373
#
«
*
*
*
1811
1738
2232
2232
1254
1254
5790
825
*
5557
5564.
5557
2452
3623
3436
3635
2786
3251
3010
2940
                                      94

-------
RUN DATE 021572
                      LAKE  HOPE  SURVEILANCE  PROGRAM
                            WATER  QUALITY  DATA
SAMPLE
DATE POINT
041471
042471
042971
050171
050371
050571
050371
051571
052371
060271
042970
050670
050770
052070
052170
060370
060370
060470
062470
03C671
031171
031371
031771
032071
032371
032671
033071
040371
040771
041071
041471
042471
042971
050171
050371
050571
050871
051571
052371
060271
042870
050670
050770
052070
052170
060370
547
547
547
547
547
547
547
547
547
547
560
560
560
560
560
560
560
560
56C
560
560
560
560
560
560
560
560
560
560
560
560
560
560
560
560
560
560
560
560
560
588
588
588
588
588
588
NO
SI
SI
SI
SI
SI
SI
SI
SI
SI
SI
SI
SI
SI
SI
SI
SI
S2
SI
SI
SI
SI
SI
SI
SI
SI
SI
SI
Si
SI
SI
SI
SI
SI
SI
SI
SI
31
SI
SI
SI
SI
SI
SI
SI
SI
SI
FLOW
GPM
88.0
53.0
53.0
61.0
61.0
71.0
341.0
200.0
76,0
76.0
130,0
2.2
2.2
21.7
12.4
12.4
12.4
34.2
#
*
w
166.0
65.0
37.0
37,0
53.0
45.0
37.0
37.0
#
#
6.0
#
52.0
36. C
71.0
341.0
162.0
45.0
6.0
*
#
*
12.4
#
12.4
TEMP
48
52
48
52
48
51
54
53
51
52
*
60
58
72
70
62
62
62
*
46
44
45
45
44
43
47
46
48
47
69
48
66
48
52
46
49
58
56
61
72
#
60
58
72
70
62
PH
2.7
3.5
3.2
3.0
3.6
3,9
3.3
2*8
2.5
2.8
3.3
3.2
3.3
3.6
3.7
3.3
3.3
3.5
3,9
2.9
3.9
4.0
3.5
5.2
3.8
3.5
4.4
2.5
2.6
3.4
3.8
4.3
3.9
4,3
5.6
5.0
3.6
3.7
3.5
3.3
2.6
2.8
2.8
2.7
2.6
2.7
ACI
MG/L
1216
1102
*
1250
2420
1000
1140
1000
1128
1166
96
664
664
424
140
250
290
142
20
150
68
28
58
30
28
80
22
39
92
52
62
82
#
94
160
174
214
90
138
70
700
1080
1100
2166
2046
1800
DITY
LB/D
1286
701
*
915
1771
852
4665
2400
1029
1063
150
18
18
110
21
37
43
58
#
*•
#
56
45
13
12
51
12
17
41
*
*
6
#
59
69
148
876
175
75
5
*
*
*
325
*
268
IRON
MG/L LB/D
86.0
85.0
114.Q
102.0
85.0
100.0
86.0
78.0
58.0
74.0
30.0
3.5
3.5
2.5
2.2
1.5
1.5
5.0
4.0
10.0
18,0
10.0
4.0
4.0
13.0
12.0
5.0
3.0
8.0
4.0
6*0
4.0
16.0
12.0
13.0
20.0
20.0
18.8
5.0
8.0
50.0
2.9
3.0
40.0
40.0
35.0
93
54
73
75
62
85
352
187
53
67
47
*
#
1
*
*
*
2
*
*
*
20
3
2
6
8
3
1
4
#
#
*
#
7
6
17
82
37
3
1
•X-
*
#
6
#
5
SULFATE
MG/L LB/D
2400
2450
2225
2350
2625
2025
2175
2050
1875
2125
120
2000
1800
2000
1200
3000
3000
300
100
300
156
225
96
175
50
100
25
125
175
100
125
100
50
125
125
200
225
125
75
25
1** ^ ^\
250
2500
2500
2800
2600
2000
2534
1558
1415
1720
1922
1725
8900
4920
1710
1938
187
53
48
521
179
446
446
123
*
*
#
448
75
78
22
64
14
56
78
#
*
7
#
78
54
170
921
243
40
2
•it-
#
*
417
#
298
                                      95

-------
                      LAKE HOPE SURVEILANCE PROGRAM
                           WATER QUALITY DATA
RUN DATE 021572
, SAMPLE
DATE .POINT
060370 •
060470
030671
031171
031371
031771
032071
032371 .
032671
033071
04C371 .
04G771
041071 i
041471
042471 ,
042971
05C171
050371 "
05Q571. '
05C871 >
051571
052371
063271
03Q671
031171,
031371
C31771
032071 ,
032371
032671
033071
040371
040771
041071
041471
042471
042971
05C171
050371
050571
050871
051571
052371
060271
062470
042870
r
583
588
588
588
. 538
588
588
588
588
588
588
588
588
583
588
588
588
588
588
588
588
588
, 588
589
589
589
589
.589
589
589
589
589
589
589
589
589
589
589
589
589
539
599
589
589
591
701
NO'
52
SI
SI
Si
SI
SI
SI
SI
SI
SI
SI
SI
SI
51
SI
•SI
SI
SI
SI
Si
SI
SI
Si
SI
SI
SI
SI
;S1
tsi
SI
SI
si
SI
SI
Si
SI
SI
SI
SI
SI
51
SI
SI
SI
Si
SI
..FLOW
'.GP.M
. 12.4
..,34.2
129.0
.204.0
129.0
.76.0
.76.0
100. 0
,65.0
'."53.0
,' 53. C
45.0
37.0
37.0
',,30.0
•,,.,37.C
29. C
,43.0
'",36.0
,,265.0
;tl.95.0
.,,45.0
,.37.0
*
Vx20.0
' .,12.0
*
*
#
#
*
#
*
2.0
1.5
C
^
e
5
1.5
1.0
35.0
21.0
2.0
*
•M-
*
TEMP
62
62
46
43
51
46
43
44
47
49
54
50
62
54
59
49
62
46
51
57
58
63
61
41
40
46
43
40
41
49
51
50
54
66
58
66
52
62
46
52
56
64
79
78
*
*
PH
2.8
2.6
2.3
3.3
3.2
2.9
2.8
2.4
2.6
2.6
2.7
2.6
2.7
2.4
3.0
3.0
2.7
3.4
3.5
3.0
3.1
3.0
3.2
2.3
4.C
3.9
3.1
2.7
2.5
2.4
2.5
2.8
3.0
2.5
2.2
3.4
3.0
2.8
3.2
4.1
3.9
3.9
2.0
2.2
2.9
4.7
ACI
MG/L
1890
1360
650
510
904
916
942
970
972
1146
1340
1474
1630
2112
2564
*
3120
1950
970
1690
1286
1180
1852
590
90
305
568
712
1112
1496
1696
1594
1788
1978
2000
2348
¥•
2824
1888
1744
68
336
2314
2188
825
20
DITY
LB/D
281
558
1006
1248
1399
835
859
1164
758
729
852
796
724
938
923
*
1086
1006
419
5374
1466
637
822
#
22
44
*
*
*
*
*
#
#
47
36
14
*
17
34
21
29
85
56
*
*
#
IRON
MG/L LB/D,
50.0
40.0
65.0
65.0
121.0
105.0
111.0
108.0
98.0
105.0
123.0
146.0
166.0
188.0
225.0
260.0
260.0
100.0
185.0
173.0
120.0
93.0
134.0
55.0
20.0
39.0
• 7.0
68.0
123.0
136.0
167.0
163.0
168.0
177.0
164.0
200.0
220.0
205.0
124.0
157.0
4.0
55.0
195.0
160.0
50.0
.5
7
16
101
159
187
96
101
130
76
67
78
79
74
83
81
115
90
52
80
550
137
. 53
59
#
5
6
*
#
*
*
#
•*
#
4
3
1
2
1
2
2
2
14
5
*
#
*
SULFATE
MG/L LB/D
3000
2750
1250
1032
2350
1632
1700
1925
,1700
2150
2750
2875
3500
3750
4500
4375
5000
1975
4500
3000
2375
2100
3250
1125
312
863
1152
1300
2375
2600
4000
2875
3500
4325
4000
4375
3675
4500
4000
4500
100
800
5000
4500
2000
44
446
1129
1935
2526
3638
1488
1550
2310
1326
1367
1749
1552
1554
1-665
1620
1943
1740
1019
1944
9540
2707
1134
1443
#
75
124
*
#
*
*
#
#
#
104
72
26
35
27
72
54
42
202
120
*
*
*
                                      96

-------
RUN  DATE  021572
                          LAKE  HOPE  SURVEILANCE  PROGRAM
                                WATER QUALITY DATA
SAMPLE
DATE POINT
052070
032170
060370
Q60370
060470
062370
032671
033071
04C371
040771
041071
041471
042171
042471
042971
050171
050371
050571
050871
051571
052371
06C271
031171
031371
031771
032071
032371
050871
051571
701
701
701
701
701
701
701
701
701
701
701
701
701
701
701
701
701
701
701
701
701
701
801
801
801
8C1
8C1
801
SOI
NO
SI
SI
SI
S2
SI
SI
SI
SI
Si
SI
Si
SI
SI
Si
SI
SI
SI
SI
SI
SI
SI
SI
Si
SI
SI
SI
SI
SI
SI
FLOW
GPM
ft
»
*'
ft
*
«
#
*
»
ft
ft
ft
#
*
ft
#
*
ft
*
ft
ft
#
*
ft
ft
ft
ft
1125. C
ft
TEMP
72
70
62
62
62
*
44
53
48
47
56
46
48
51
48
52
46
49
58
64
56
61
40
46
39
39
39
63
64
PH
3.3
3.3
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.2
6.4
3.7
4.0
3.7
3.6
3.6
3.5
3.9
#
3.7
4.4
4.5
6.8
6.7
4.8
4.8
5.5
6.5
5.1
4.3
4.5
7.4
7.1
ACIDITY
MG/L LB/D
156
112
300
350
200
137
28
38
42
52
60
74
104
90
*
120
128
100
14
28
70
84
4
80
8
24
34
6
26
*
*
*
ft
#
*
ft
ft
ft
ft
«
*
ft
#
#
ft
ft
»
*
*
ft
#
#
ft
#
ft
ft
81
*
iPtQN
MG/L L-B/B
1.5
.9
5.0
5..0
3.0
4.5
9.0
6.0
1.0
1.0
3.0
8.0
9'.0
5.0
5,0
10.0
8*0
3.0
1*6
.5
3.5
9.0
6.0
11*0
4.0
3.0
10. d
1.3
.2
#
*,
#
ft
#
#
«
#
ft
ft
ft
«
«
«
«•
»
#
*
ft
*
ft
ft
#.
ft
ft
ft
#
18
ft
SULFATE
l^i/k LB/D
60
60
iooo
3006
30Q
300
60
68
6$
77
:84
101
13b
120
148
IE}®
170
210
4fi
62
1*
75
156
275
96
ioo
50
166
125
\4
*
*
*
ft
ft
ft
ft
*
#
*
ft
ft
*
ft
»
*
i
*
ft
*
ft
#
#
ft
ft
#
ft
2241
#
*U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1973 514-153/230 1-3
                                             97

-------
 w
                                                 SELECTED WATER RESOURCES ABSTRACTS
                                                        INPUT TRANSACTION  FORM
      State of Ohio,  Dept.  of Natural Resources
       FEASIBILITY STUDY,  LAKE HOPE MINE DRAINAGE DEMONSTRATION PROJECT
  IQJAirtftoifs;


         N.A.
                                         Project Designation

                                           EPA Grant 1^010 HJQ
                                          Note
  221citation
 "'  Environmental  Protection Agency Report
      Number EPA-R2-73-151
  23
    Descriptors (Starred First)

      Acid Mine Drainage*,  Mine Sealing,* Refuse Piles*
  25
    Identifiers (Starred First)

      ^-Feasibility Study,  *Lake Hope, Ohio
 27
    Abstract
       The Lake Hope project will demonstrate the control and elimination of mine drainage
pollution by refuse pile  disposal and/or covering and underground mine sealings.  Acid pro-
ducing coal refuse will be  removed and buried in suitably prepared sites.  These sites will
be finished graded and seeded.   Non-acid producing coal mine refuse piles will be reshaped
to existing contours, covered and reclaimed by appropriate seeding and tree planting for
erosion control and aesthetic enhancement.  The mine sealing demonstration program will
be undertaken in two phases. The first phase will seal those mine openings which have
been determined the most  significant acid discharges and those openings immediately ad-
jacent to or suspected of having connecting with the high acid concentration  discharge
openings.  The second phase will seal selected remaining mine openings as determined by
the continuous water quality monitoring data obtained.  Continuous water quality mon-
itoring systems will obtain data to be evaluated over the life of the project and after
all construction has been completed.
Abstractor
         E. F. Harris
                               Institution
                                 Environmental Protection Agency
 «R:
-------